Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2016-12-06 City Council - Full Agenda-1793
o Agenda Edmonds City Council snl. ynyo COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 DECEMBER 6, 2016, 6:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL 3. PRESENTATION 1. Presentation on Parliamentary Procedure (45 min.) 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 5. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of November 22, 2016 2. Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of November 22, 2016 3. Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments. 4. October 2016 Monthly Budgetary Financial Report 5. Appointment of Donnie Griffin to the Diversity Commission 6 7. 8 9. CONTINUED PRESENTATIONS 1. Carl Zapora Proclamation (5 min.) 2. Prosecutor's Annual Report to City Council (15 min.) AUDIENCE COMMENTS (3-MINUTE LIMIT PER PERSON) - REGARDING MATTERS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments (30 min.) 2. Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement (45 min.) ACTION ITEMS 1. Adoption of the 2017 Budget & Use of Real Estate Excise Tax Funds (30 min.) 10. STUDY ITEMS 1. Discussion on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement (45 min.) 2. 2017 Legislative Agenda (20 min.) 3. 2016 4th Quarter Budget Amendment (15 min.) 4. Prosecutor's contract renewal (10 min.) 5. Presentation of Bids for the Veteran's Plaza Project (5 minutes) 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS Edmonds City Council Agenda December 6, 2016 Page 1 13. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(1) 14. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION. ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda December 6, 2016 Page 2 3.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Presentation on Parliamentary Procedure (45 min.) Staff Lead: Kristiana Johnson Department: City Council Preparer: Andrew Pierce Background/History Following months of testimony and deliberation regarding the Washington State Department of Ecology's (now "DOE") Conditional Approval of the City's proposed Shoreline Master Program, the City Council voted to send the Edmonds Conditional Approval Response attached to this memorandum. After the Council voted, and after the Conditional Approval Response letter was transmitted to the DOE, the Mayor acting independently, and a group of three Council Members that comprised the minority in the aforementioned vote each sent separate letters to the DOE expressing their inability to support the decision of the majority regarding the specifics of the Conditional Approval Response. In response to the letters sent by the Mayor and the minority, three Council Members in the majority also sent a letter to the DOE concerning the two letters sent expressing a lack of support for the majority's decision. Staff Recommendation None. Narrative In order to clarify and better understand the parliamentary procedures concerning this type of scenario. Ms. Ann Griffin Macfarlane of Jurassic Parliament, an expert in parliamentary procedure and the Robert's Rules of Order, was asked to address the Council regarding the procedural and ethical considerations presented in this situation. Attachments: Macfarlane Resume EdmondsCondtionalApproval Response 20161114083030 Mayor_DOE_SM P_letter DOE_marsh_setback_letter_councilmembers CODE —OF —ETHICS Code of Conduct - Resolution No. 1306 Packet Pg. 3 3.1.a ANN G. MACFARLANE, P" PO Box 77553 Seattle WA 98177 Tel: 2o6-542-8422 Email: ann@jurassicparliament.com Ann Griffin Macfarlane studied Russian and Ancient Greek at the University of California, Santa Cruz. She was awarded a Marshall Scholarship by the British government to earn a B.A./M.A. degree from Cambridge University, England. She began her career as a diplomat in the U.S. Foreign Service. Fluent in Urdu, Ann served in Lahore, Pakistan and on the Bangladesh desk of the State Department before becoming the first woman staff assistant in the Near East South Asia Bureau. In that position she supported Henry Kissinger's shuttle diplomacy in the Middle East and supervised the flow of reporting and memoranda for other hot spots in the region. After study at the Army Russian Institute in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Ann married fellow Foreign Service Officer Lew Macfarlane. She served on the Soviet desk before resigning her commission to devote herself to their family in the Congo, Tanzania, and Kathmandu. The Macfarlanes returned to Seattle, Lew's native city, with their three sons. Ann became a professional translator and was elected President of the American Translators Association. She then served as Executive Director of the National Association of Judiciary Interpreters and Translators before becoming a partner with Andrew Estep as an owner of ERGA, Inc., an association management company, from 2007 to 2014. Ann and Andrew developed "Jurassic Parliament" as a way of helping people run productive meetings. Their approach makes Robert's Rules of Order understandable, enjoyable, and easy to learn. They published Mastering Council Meetings: A guidebook for elected officials and local governments in 2013. Education and Credentials: • Professional Registered Parliamentarian, National Association of Parliamentarians • Certified Association Executive, American Society of Association Executives • Certificate in Nonprofit Management, University of Washington • U.S. Army Russian Institute Certificate, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany • B.A./M.A. Cambridge University, England • Marshall Scholarship, Her Majesty's Government, United Kingdom • B.A. with highest honors, University of California Santa Cruz Packet Pg. 4 October 19, 2016 Maia D. Bellon, Director WA State Department of Ecology Attention: Director's Office PO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-6700 Re: City of Edmonds Shoreline Master Program Comprehensive Update — City Response to Department of Ecology's Conditional Approval Dear Ms. Bellon, The City of Edmonds appreciates the additional time granted by Ecology to fully evaluate and prepare a response to the Department of Ecology's conditional approval of the City's Shoreline Master Program. Since receiving Ecology's conditional approval with eight required changes and one recommended change, the City has spent a significant amount of time evaluating Ecology's required changes including discussing the proposed changes over the course of seven Council meetings and receiving many public comments on Ecology's proposed changes. The required changes from Ecology can be split into two categories, 1) Requires changes 1— 5 related to incorporating the recently updated critical area regulations into the SMP and 2) required changes 6 - 8 related to the Urban Mixed Use IV shoreline environment. Regarding incorporating the critical area regulations into the SMP, the City Council largely agrees with the changes proposed by Ecology with one exception. After the City of Edmonds adopted the updated critical area regulations in May 2016 with Ordinance No. 4026, Ecology released Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates (Publication No. 16-06-001) in June 2016. The wetland regulations in Ordinance No. 4026 and the SMP conditionally approved by Ecology were based on Ecology's Wetland & CAO Updates: Guidance for Small Cities (Publication No. 10-06-002). The City Council has determined to follow the most recent guidance with regards to Best Available Science and the City's development regulations. As a result, Ecology's Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates (Publication No. 16-06-001) is being incorporated into the SMP. Please see Attachment A for the specific alternatives and the rationale for the proposed changes. The Urban Mixed Use IV changes apply to the area surrounding the Edmonds Marsh, which is an important feature (ecologically and socially) of the Edmonds waterfront area. While the City Council accepts the change related to dropping the interim designation for the Urban Mixed Use IV shoreline environment, the City Council does not believe Ecology's proposed setback/buffer in the UMU IV environment are consistent with the Shoreline Management Act, Shoreline Master Program guidelines, or the best available science and wetland guidance in Ecology's Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates (Publication No. 16-06-001). The City Council is proposing an alternative setback/buffer for the UMU IV environment and establishing an alternative threshold for buffer establishment. The City's proposed Packet Pg. 5 alternatives are included in Attachment A with an expanded rationale for the City's proposed alternative included to required changes 7 and 8 in Attachment B. Finally, the City acknowledges Ecology's recommended change to allow residential development with the Urban Mixed Use IV environment but declines to implement this change at this time. Please accept this letter along with Attachment A and B as the City of Edmonds' response as required by RCW 90.58.090(2)(e). The City of Edmonds appreciates the efforts of David Pater, Paul Anderson and Joe Burcar in this update and their attendance at Council meetings as the City has worked through the SMP update process. Sincerely, Kristiana Johnson City of Edmonds Council President Cc: Dave Earling, City of Edmonds Mayor David Pater, Ecology, Shoreline Planner Joe Burcar, Ecology, SEA Section Manager Paul Anderson, Ecology, Wetlands/401 Unit Supervisor Packet Pg. 6 3.1.c EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Edmonds City Hall 121 5"' Avenue North • Edmonds, WA 98020 Inc. 10V November 3, 2016 Ms. Maia D. Bellon, Director WA State Department of Ecology Attention: Director's Office PO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-6700 RE: Two City of Edmonds' Letter Responses to the Shoreline Master Program Comprehensive Update and City of Edmonds' Final Response to Department of Ecology's Conditional Approval Dear Ms. Bellon: We are writing to you to remind you of our official City of Edmonds response to Department of Ecology's recommendations in light of other letters you have received that are not the official position of the City of Edmonds. Many Council Members were not surprised of Mayor Earling's Letter of October 21St, stating that he would not accept Council's recommended 110 foot buffer and 15 foot setback requirements set forth in the City of Edmonds Conditional Approval for the Urban Mixed Use IV category. The setback and buffer requirements voted upon and approved are outlined in the recent Department of Ecology's literature using best available science guidelines for a Category 2 Estuaries/Wetlands. Mayor Earling and his Administration were part of numerous meetings held in 2014, whereas individuals from Ecology (Mr. Pater, Mr. Anderson and Mr. Stockdale) brought forth the selected 50 foot buffer that was eventually assigned by Department of Ecology. Current and Former Council Members that were part of those meetings disputed the arbitrary 50 foot buffer number that Ecology selected as previous State of Ecology literature required a minimum 75 foot buffer using best available science for a Category 2 Estuary/Wetland. Packet Pg. 7 3.1.c Four Council Members and numerous citizen scientists were surprised when the October 251h City of Edmonds' Letter was submitted by the minority Council Members. The combined legislative experience of these three Council Members is approximately 3.5 years; and one Council Member was not even present for the final response approval vote allowing Mayor Earling a vote to break a tie on an amendment. The combined legislative experience of the four remaining Council Members (of which one has sat on the WRIA8 Salmon Recovery Committee for approximately six years) is approximately 19 years. It is unfortunate that in the current climate of partisan politics that your office had to be part of the lack of respect for this extremely complex, lengthy, and detailed process. We appreciate all the work that Mr. Pater and Mr. Anderson has provided to the City of Edmonds, but we as the official legislative body for the City of Edmonds respectfully disagreed with their findings as we could find no scientific basis for it. As legislators who are not scientists, we must rely on governing laws, guidelines, citizens' comments who are scientists and rules to provide justification for our decisions. Sincerely, Diane Buckshnis, Council Member Mi e Nelson, Council Member 2 o - � P0 Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council Member Packet Pg. 8 InC. 1890 October 21, 2016 CITY OF EDMONDS CITY HALL • THIRD FLOOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0247 • fax (425) 771-0252 www.edmondswa.gov OFFICE OF THE MAYOR Maia D. Bellon, Director WA State Department of Ecology Attention: Director's Office PO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-6700 RE: Response to Department of Ecology's Conditional Approval of City of Edmonds Shoreline Master Program Comprehensive Update Dear Ms. Bellon: 3.1.d DAVE EARLING MAYOR You have received the Edmonds City Council's response to Ecology's conditional approval of the City's Shoreline Master Program. However, an important aspect of the response —the width of the buffer/setback between the marsh and an urbanized area —does not reflect a unified response from City elected officials. In fact, I support Ecology's proposal on this. The current 23-acre marsh is what remains of what was originally estimated to be a 40-acre barrier estuary and marsh complex. The Edmonds Marsh once extended up to Main Street. Over the years, the marsh has been filled, bisected by State Route 104 and surrounded by development. As Ecology has noted, little intact buffer remains around the marsh. On the north side of the marsh is the Port of Edmonds Harbor Square Development, a commercial business park developed in the early 1980s. On the south side of the marsh is the former Unocal tank farm site, which has been identified as a potential site for a new ferry terminal and transit center. While all parties desire to protect and greatly enhance the remaining marsh, there is disagreement on how to achieve these goals. In the Department of Ecology's required change number 7, your agency proposed a 50-foot buffer with a 15-foot building setback for a total setback of 65 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the marsh in the Urban IV Mixed Use shoreline environment. The proposal acknowledges existing conditions surrounding the marsh and the "no net loss" requirements of the Shoreline Management Act, but also requires the establishment of a 50-foot vegetative buffer with redevelopment. The City Council's new alternative calls for a 110-foot buffer with a 15-foot setback for a total setback of 125 feet from the ordinary high water mark of the marsh. Unfortunately, this fails to recognize existing conditions and results in a buffer only on paper. It is more likely to act as a disincentive to redevelopment and enhancement opportunities and thus perpetuate the status quo. Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Packet Pg. 9 3.1.d On this issue, I support Ecology's proposed requirement for a 50-foot vegetative buffer with a 15-foot additional building setback. Such a buffer —which is much greater than exists now in many parts of the site —will increase protection of the marsh and yet allow the possibility of redevelopment outside the buffer/setback. Any redevelopment would be required to significantly enhance the marsh environment, not only through a vegetated buffer but also through improved stormwater management. This is a real world solution to protecting and improving our valuable marsh. As a result, I am not in agreement with the Council's proposed buffer/setback for the Urban Mixed Use IV shoreline environment but rather support Ecology's required change number 7 with the 50-foot buffer and 15-foot setback for a total setback of 65-feet from the ordinary high water mark of the m Edmonds marsh. ' a� U 0 Thank you for all the work your agency has done to assist and provide direction on implementing the a - Shoreline Management Act. 2_1% c Sincerely, °' E CU o r cu Dave Earling w Mayor L a Cc: City Council L; N Packet Pg. 10 3.1.e CITY OF EDMONDS CITY HALL • 121 5'h AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA, 98020 PHONE 425.771-2525 • FAX 425.771.0252 • www.edmondswa.gov 1 C. 0 October 25, 2016 Maia D. Bellon, Director WA State Department of Ecology Attention: Director's Office PO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-6700 RE: City of Edmonds Shoreline Master Program Comprehensive Update; and Response to Department of Ecology's Conditional Approval Dear Ms. Bellon: DAVE EARLING MAYOR We are writing to you as a three -member minority of the seven -member Edmonds City Council that responded last week to the Department of Ecology's conditional approval of the City's Shoreline Master Program. While we respect the Council majority vote, we think it also fair to let you know that the City Council decision was divided on a 3-4 vote regarding the appropriate width of the buffer/setback affecting a part of the Edmonds Marsh (i.e., the Urban Mixed Use IV designation). On this issue, the three of us dissented from the majority because we believe the Marsh environment is more likely to be improved within the next few years by allowing a reasonable level of development for which enhancing the Marsh —for example, through buffer restoration and a more effective stormwater management system —would be required. We are concerned that the proposed 110-foot buffer with an additional 15- foot building setback (totaling 125 feet) takes up such a significant amount of private property that the owners will not be motivated to redevelop and improve the marsh environment. We also support the Mayor's letter to you about this same topic. Our preference is to accept Ecology's proposal for a buffer in this one area to be 50 feet plus a 15-foot building setback, as the Department of Ecology proposed. The area is already developed and has very little actual buffer at this time. Our desire is to improve the Marsh habitat as soon as is practically possible and we are concerned a 125 foot setback will delay real enhancements to the Marsh far into the foreseeable future. Thank you for considering these concerns. Sincerely, Thomas Mesaros Councilmember Cc: City Council Dave Teitzel Councilmember Neil Tibbott Councilmember • Incorporated August 11,1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Packet Pg. 11 3.1.f CODE OF ETHICS The purpose of the Edmonds Code of Ethics is to strengthen the quality of government through ethical principles which shall govern the conduct of elected officials and appointed citizen volunteers serving in an official capacity (i.e. Boards and Commissions). We shall: • Be dedicated to the concepts of effective and democratic government. • Affirm the dignity and worth of the services rendered by government and maintain a sense of social responsibility. • Be dedicated to the highest ideals of honor and integrity in all public and personal relationships. • Recognize that the chief function of local government at all times is to serve the best interest of all the people. • Keep the community informed on municipal affairs and encourage communications between the citizens and all municipal officers. Emphasize friendly and courteous service to the public and each other; seek to improve the quality of public service, and confidence of citizens. • Seek no favor; do not personally benefit or profit by confidential information or by misuse of public resources. • Conduct business of the city in a manner which is not only fair in fact, but also in appearance. Approved by the Edmonds City Council on 06-02-2015. Packet Pg. 12 3.1.g RESOLUTION NO: 1306 A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING A CODE OF CONDUCT FOR THE MAYOR, COUNCILMEMBERS, AND ALL MEMBERS OF CITY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, OR WORK GROUPS. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that City business should be conducted publicly, in an atmosphere of respect and civility, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the following Code of Conduct is adopted and shall apply to the Mayor, City Councilmembers, and members of all City Boards, Commissions, or work groups. In the course of their duties, all group leaders will: 1) provide all members a fair opportunity to participate, 2) not permit any member to dominate proceedings or intimidate other members, and 3) not permit any disrespectful behavior toward participants. In the course of their duties, all participants, including leaders, will: 1) respect the individual talents and contributions of others, LO 2) avoid offensive comments and behavior, 3) avoid intimidating comments and behavior, 4) listen courteously and attentively, W 5) conduct public business in an open and transparent manner, c M 6) assist leaders in ensuring fair treatment of all members, and 7) assist leaders in controlling disrespectful or intimidating behavior. z When speaking officially, all leaders and members will respectfully convey the position of their group. When speaking personally, all leaders and members will disclose that their comments are their own, and not made as a representative of their group. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Adopted this 10th of December, 2013. ATTEST/ NTICA CITY CLIEMK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: December 6, 2013 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: December 10, 2013 RESOLUTION NO: 1306 Packet Pg. 13 5.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of November 22, 2016 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 11-22-2016 Draft Special Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 14 5.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES NOVEMBER 22, 2016 The City Council Special Meeting was called to order at 6:40 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. Elected Officials Present Others Present Kristiana Johnson, Council President Mark Bucklin, attorney Mike Nelson, Councilmember Al Compaan, Police Chief Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Tom Mesaros, Councilmember (arrived 6:57 p.m.) Mayor Dave Earling 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION The City Council adjourned to the Jury Meeting Room to discuss litigation or potential litigation per RCW 42.3 0.11 0(l)(i). A n_rnr TR N The meeting was adjourned at 7:02 p.m. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 15 5.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Approval of Council Meeting Minutes of November 22, 2016 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: 11-22-2016 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Packet Pg. 16 5.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES November 22, 2016 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Kristiana Johnson, Council President Michael Nelson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Al Compaan, Police Chief J. Hwang, Police Officer Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir. Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir Shane Hope, Development Services Director Scott James, Finance Director Dave Turley, Assistant Finance Director Mary Ann Hardie, HR Director Rob Chave, Planning Manager Rob English, City Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5t" Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER, MOVING ITEMS 4.4 — 4.13 TO ACTION ITEMS FOLLOWING THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 1, 2016 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 15, 2016 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 1 Packet Pg. 17 5.2.a 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM, PAYROLL AND BENEFIT DIRECT DEPOSIT, CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS. 14. AUTHORIZATION TO RELEASE THE SALVAGE OF UNIT 779-POL TO EVERGREEN ADJUSTMENT SERVICE 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Michael Reagan, Edmonds, said he has meet a lot of people and seen a lot of near misses as a walker, runner and driver in Edmonds for the past 35 years. About two years ago, he was asked to join a group interested in facilitating changes to Olympic View Drive to improve safety. The group met with the City, a lot of good ideas were identified but at the conclusion they were told there was no money. The group was upset and wanted to be disruptive at City Council meetings to get the Council's attention. He withdrew from that group, preferring to deal with Councilmembers directly and great changes were subsequently made to Olympic View Drive. Mayor Earling then asked him to participate in his pedestrian safety group; the ten members meet regularly and have identified ideas to make Edmonds safer for pedestrians and drivers. Sadly, the end result has been the same, no money. He supported the $15,000 in the budget for that group to do something, recognizing that $15,000 may seem like a lot of money but the group has identified a lot of good ideas that can possibly save lives. Personally, if the Council does not support that group, he may not be able to continue because he does not have time to sit around and talk and not do anything. Early this morning he was drawing a police officer killed in San Antonio so he could mail it to his family today. Although it's difficult to find time for other things, he wants to participate in the pedestrian safety group because he feels it is important. When the Council is discussing that funding, he suggested they consider that someone they know could be saved if there were funds to make some safety improvements. Kay Hogan, Edmonds, said she moved to Edmonds 1 %2 years ago, primarily because she wanted a walkable town where she could gracefully grow old. She asked the Council to reconsider adding street lights in a small section on Pine Street off SR-104. She walks daily to the bus stop, the waterfront, to the senior center, and downtown to shop. She tries to be home before dark to avoid walking in that section of Pine Street. She also walks pulling her suitcase to the Amtrak station and to take the bus. The train returns to Edmonds at 7:15 p.m.; her walk is well lit on SR-104 from the Amtrak station until she reaches Pine Street where it is pitch dark. This is not a problem in the summer but after daylight savings times ends, the path off SR-104 onto Pine Street is pitch dark and a very scary. The sidewalk is uneven due to the slope and in the dark, that is not visible. She has fallen once in that area and scraped her knees and hands but fears another fall could result in broken bones. Several other seniors live in the area and walk on Pine Street. Funding for this project would affect the lives of a lot of people in a positive way and she urged the Council to reconsider funding the lights. David Honneke, Edmonds, spoke regarding the streetlights, agreeing it is very dark in that area and during the winter months, rain on the weeds on the walkway make it slick. He recalled about four years ago driving down the hill and nearly hitting a tree that had fallen across street because it was so dark. He encouraged the Council to reconsider funding the streetlights. This a walking community and the streetlight would make it a much safer place to walk. He wished the Council a Happy Thanksgiving. Pam Erickson, Edmonds, expressed support for Ms. Hogan's comments. She pointed out a new building with about 84 units will be added to that street and with the added traffic volume, more light will be needed. She recently came upon a deer while driving; if her headlights had not reflected in the deer's eyes, she may not have seen it. Don Ricker, Edmonds, asked the City Council to consider including funds for street lighting on Pine Street. He commented there have already been a couple near misses including a resident who nearly hit Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 2 Packet Pg. 18 5.2.a one of the people working on Building 10 who park in the swale where there are no lights and walk up the hill. He agreed Edmonds is a walking community but residents need safe places to walk. Tom Graff, Edmonds, board member of the Pt. Edwards HOA, said 436 people live at Pt. Edwards, and he estimated another 100 will move into Building 10. A significant number of Woodway residents live in the neighborhood and walk into downtown Edmonds. Walkers are a good thing for the City, when people get in their car, they are more likely to go elsewhere; walkers almost always go into downtown Edmonds. At night, that area is pitch black and there are no street lights; the hatchery is on one side and the other side is wooded. He challenged Councilmembers to walk that area after sunset. Fifty percent of Pt Edwards homeowners are over 65, 60% are women and they do not feel safe walking in this area at night. During the summer, it is not a problem but during the winter, it's dark at 5 and icy in the morning. He is uncomfortable walking that area in the dark to catch a bus or train and he could image how older adults feel walking in that area. He begged the Council to fund the streetlights. 3�au1.1N[a11W.111.1Ie[e�i 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2017 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET AND POTENTIAL ADOPTION Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members of the audience present who wished to provide comment and Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the hearing. Finance Director Scott James suggested the Council continue discussion regarding the requested changes. Councilmember Buckshnis suggested further discussion during Item 8.4, scheduled for 60 minutes, regarding the City budget. Mayor Earling agreed. 7. ACTION ITEMS 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2016 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES AND NEW SECTION 3.36 OF ECC COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO ACCEPT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. RESOLUTION DECLARING A SUBSTANTIAL NEED FOR A 1% PROPERTY TAX INCREASE COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING NO. 3. ORDINANCE ADOPTING A 1% PROPERTY TAX LEVY INCREASE COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING NO. 4. ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1% EMS LEVY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO ADOPT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. APPROVAL OF 2017-2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENT Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 3 Packet Pg. 19 5.2.a COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. APPROVAL OF THE 2017-2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE. Council President Johnson said during a meeting with Council and staff last week to discuss the details of the CIP, she expressed concern about the speed with which the Council moved through this very important item and it was suggested the CIP be revisited during the first quarter of 2017. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REVISIT THE 2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DURING THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2017. Mayor Earling asked how that would affect projects that need to be moved along. Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite said staff would love to have an adopted CFP/CIP so that projects can be started. Her understanding from the meeting last week was that the CIP would be discussed possibly as a retreat item or later in the year but not necessarily revisit the allocations for projects this year because an adopted CIP is needed to begin applying for grants and getting projects in the queue. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for approving the CIP now. She agreed the Council needs to review the CIP/CFP with a fine-tooth comb next year either in committee or at the retreat as there may be some items that need to be removed. She did not support the amendment. Ms. Hite recalled the meeting last week included discussion about having a Council discussion in the first or second quarter of 2017 about financial policies as they relate to land acquisition. She recalled Council President Johnson's interest in identifying more funds for land acquisition; that was discouraged at last week's meeting due to the impact it would have on projects that are already planned for 2017. If Council agrees, staff could work with the Mayor on how to make that happen. Council President Johnson agreed that was the take -way from last week's meeting. The group discussed the CIP and the allocation of REET 1 funds in the CIP. She suggested for next year's budget, this discussion occur earlier. She agreed further discussion could occur at either the retreat or in committee if the Council returned to the committee system. Councilmember Tibbott preferred to look at the CIP through the lens of a policy decision, not redoing it. He did not support the amendment. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked if having a discussion next year would satisfy Council President Johnson versus delaying approval of the CIP until next year. Council President Johnson said she, Councilmembers Tibbott and Teitzel, Mr. Williams, Ms. Hite, Mr. English and Mayor Earling were at the at the meeting last week. Given the tight turnaround, there isn't time to go into a lengthy discussion. She agreed it could be a policy discussion or discussed at the long range financial plan. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas did not support the amendment as she did not want to delay the CIP/CFP. Council President Johnson expressed concern the Council did not begin discussions until October/November this year and she did not want to wait until the end of the budget process to discuss it in the future. Councilmember Teitzel recommended it be considered as a global policy next year. If an opportunity arises next year to purchase open space, the Council can act without having funds set aside in an open Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 4 Packet Pg. 20 5.2.a space purchase fund. He was uncertain the Council needed to work on reallocating REET right now or in the first quarter, finding it warranted a more global discussion next year. For that reason, he did not support the amendment. AMENDMENT FAILED (1-6), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON VOTING YES. MAIN MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON VOTING NO. 7. ADOPTION OF WATER UTILITY TAX ORDINANCE COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, FOR ADOPTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. ORDINANCE AMENDING UTILITY RATES COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, FOR ADOPTION. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she understood that a majority of the Council supports a combination of utility taxes that increase taxes by 30% in three years. She pointed out taxation on any utility is the most destructive on the marginalized in the community. Affected people include seniors and disabled on fixed incomes and the working poor who are supporting families on a minimum wage. Regardless of whether they receive a discounted rate, it is a regressive tax increase because it affects those who can least afford it. A low-income person cannot say they cannot afford lights, water and rent; those are basic services to survive. Unfortunately, the rates affect renters as well as property owners. The City should not be taxing water and warmth more than food. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she supported the 1 % property tax increase; property owners have seen their values increase up to 20% in the last few years. After a recent Council meeting, she heard a few Councilmembers discussing this taxation proposal; a comment was made that bonding was not okay because it left a debt to our children and grandchildren. She pointed out funding is needed to replace years -old pipes, infrastructure that has not been cared for the past 50 years and now needs to be replaced. Government agencies have been bonding for projects like this for 100 years; bonding has been and always will be a primary source for infrastructure replacement, not having the poorest in the City pay for the mistakes of 50 years ago. She did not support the motion. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to page 26 of the packet (November 15, 2015 minutes) that reflects her opinion. Councilmember Mesaros said he was the one that made the comment about bonding and how by bonding the project actually doubles the cost. For those in the City who can least afford utilities, at some point the bonds need to be repaid and that will be at double the cost in the future for those who can least afford it. He supported collecting the funds now at a lower cost than collecting it in the future when it would be more costly. He supported the motion. Councilmember Nelson voiced his opposition to the proposal and thanked Councilmember Fraley- Monillas for her comments. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS MESAROS, TEITZEL, AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. 9. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2017 DEVELOPMENT FEE SCHEDULE Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 5 Packet Pg. 21 5.2.a COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO ACCEPT. Councilmember Teitzel said he did not have good sense for the relationship between the cost of the activity and the fee being charged. Without that data, the fee may be well above the cost and approving the fee schedule tonight will increase the fees further. Without that level of comfort, he did not support the motion. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING NO. 10. ORDINANCE ASSUMING THE DUTIES OF THE EDMONDS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS TO ACCEPT. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. STUDY ITEMS 1. REVIEW OF 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Planning Manager Rob Chave commented a major Comprehensive Plan overhaul was done last year. This year only minor amendments were required; the changes are summarized on packet page 420. The amendments fall into two categories, 1) amendments to the Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan incorporating the approved Marina Beach Master Plan, and 2) an amendment to the text of the Capital Facilities Element to add an implementation action (similar to other plan elements). The Council has reviewed the Capital Facilities Plan on a separate track and it will be incorporated into the final adopting ordinance. He highlighted more substantial amendments that are being developed and will be reviewed in early 2017such as the Water Comprehensive Plan and the Street Tree Plan. Mayor Earling advised a public hearing on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan amendments is scheduled on December 6. Council President Johnson referred to PRO Plan amendment 1C, replacing Goal 4.1-1, "Relocate incompatible uses from sensitive areas (i.e., waterfront dog park at Marina Beach Park)." with "Ensure uses in environmentally sensitive areas are consistent with critical area regulations and the Shoreline Master Program." She did not understand what that meant when there was a preexisting dog park. Mr. Chave answered the reason for the change was as Ms. Hite explained at the Planning Board, the Marina Beach Master Plan incorporated the dog park. If the intent was to relocate the dog park out of the waterfront area, that was the time to do it. Council President Johnson said that plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policy. Mr. Chave agreed incorporating this change would make it consistent. The concern was the existing language was pretty specific about relocating the dog park. As that was vetted through a public process and was integrated into the plan, it was felt since it did not run afoul of the critical area regulations or shoreline regulations, the language should be modified. Council President Johnson said she understood the dog park was very popular and one Councilmember was involved in its creation but she questioned whether it would be allowed today under the Shoreline Management Program (SMP) or the Critical Area Ordinance (CAO). Mr. Chave answered it would; it was part of the review for the Marina Beach Master Plan. Council President Johnson asked whether a new dog park would be allowed under the SMP and CAO. Mr. Chave answered it was not necessarily incompatible. Any proposal would need to be carefully considered within the CAO and SMP and it may need to be modified or configured in a certain way but he did not see it as outright incompatible. Council Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 6 Packet Pg. 22 5.2.a President Johnson said she would like that question answered before the public hearing. In reading the Planning Board minutes, it was alleged it would not be allowed today. Councilmember Buckshnis commented there are numerous dog parks on water such as Magnuson Park and on Mercer Island; Edmonds' dog park is not uniquely located near water. She welcomed staff s research. She referred to the implementation action, "Develop level of service standards for key public facilities by the end of 2017 ad consider including the standard in the Comprehensive Plan" and asked if this was similar to a capital facilities budget. Mr. Chave answered that was different; the various utilities have service standards, most frequently they are in the utility elements. This implementation action is review to see if there are any gaps. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if this was related to public facilities the City owns. Ms. Hope answered it was not necessarily the buildings; the intent was to develop a standard that could be considered as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the Street Tree Plan was part of Urban Forestry Management Plan. Ms. Hope answered they are related; a draft Street Tree Plan was developed this year but some parts will not be revisited until the Urban Forestry Management Plan is drafted. 2. RENEWAL OF INMATE HOUSING AGREEMENT WITH YAKIMA COUNTY DOC Police Chief Al Compaan advised this is a one-year extension to the existing agreement. The City has had an agreement with Yakima County since 2014. Yakima County is willing to renew current agreement terms and conditions; the only change is a 4.5% increase in the daily rate. This agreement allows the Police Department to house longer term inmates in Yakima County at considerably less cost to the City than at Lynnwood or Snohomish County Jails. Yakima County also provides transportation. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented the inclusion of transportation was a good deal. She asked the rates at the Snohomish County Jail. Chief Compaan said Yakima County's rate is $57.20/day/inmate; Snohomish County Jail charges $96.13 for their general population prisoners plus a booking fee of $118.23. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE. Council President Johnson pointed out this is a study item. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON VOTING NO. 3. PRESENTATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES FOR THE 76TH AND 212TH INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT City Engineer Rob English explained this went out to bid in June 2016 and 2 bids were received, both considerably higher than the engineer's estimate. Staff applied for a TIB grant in August 2016 and the City was recently awarded $2.2 million. The intent is to advertise the project in early 2017. This project is being repackaged with the Verdant bike lane project on 76th to realize economy of scale related to construction. This supplemental agreement is a combination of additional design costs and support during construction by the engineer of record provided by David Evans & Associates. Tasks include updating the bid package to incorporate the Verdant bike lane project, updating documents to federal requirements and providing support during the during bid phase. As part of construction management, the engineer will provide input on requests for information from the contractor, review supplementals, provide geotechnical support during construction and excavation primarily for stormwater and change order support. The total fee is $112,000 plus a $10,000 management reserve for a total of $122,864. The cost will be funded by Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 7 Packet Pg. 23 grant dollars, utility funds, 112 Fund and traffic impact fees. As there is no Council meeting next week, he requested approval of the supplemental agreement tonight to allow the bid package to move forward so it can be advertised in early 2017. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 4. CONTINUED DELIBERATIONS ON THE 2017 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET Finance Director Scott James introduced Assistant Finance Director Dave Turley and reviewed the following Staff Recommended Budget Changes: Item # Budget Book page # Description Budget Increase (Decrease) GENERAL FUND 1 43 Increase budget for Prosecutor contract $ 50,000 Impacts to General Fund $ 50,000 HOTEL/MOTEL FUND 2 95 Increase budget for Snohomish County Tourism ($200) 2 95 Decrease budget for Miscellaneous $200 Impacts to Fund 120 Budget $0 Mayor Earling advised the increase to the Prosecutor contract is a necessary increase. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed this is necessary and asked about the funding source. Mr. James advised it will be from ending fund balance. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE. Council President Johnson pointed out the Prosecutor will provide an annual report on December 6. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Hotel/Motel Fund change Mr. James advised this change simply moves $200 from one line to another and has zero impact on the fund. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. James disolaved the Council Requested Budget Changes: Item # Budget Book Page Description Cash Increase (Decrease) Yes/No GENERAL FUND 1 New Item Add Social Worker $ 50,000 Yes 2 New Item Add Parking Enforcement Officer 82,300 ? 3 New Item Add Traffic Officer 120,600 ? 4 New Item Pedestrian Safety Training 15,000 ? Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 8 Packet Pg. 24 5.2.a 5 New Item Health District Contribution 41,000 Yes 6 New Item Increase Annual Senior Center Contribution 15,000 Yes 7 New Item 1 Radar Speed Indicator Trailers 22,000 Yes 8 Page 33 Change Miscellaneous to Council Contingency $0 Yes 9 Page 143 Reduce Professional Services Budget from $12,000 to $6,000 (6,000) Yes 10 Page 143 Reduce Travel Budget from $3,000 to $1,000 (2,000) Yes 11 Page 143 Reduce Rental Budget from $10,000 to $5,000 (5,000) Yes 12 Page 143 Reduce Misc. Budget from $13,000 to $5,000 (8,000) Yes 13 New Item Historic Preservation Intern 6,000 ? Impacts to General Fund $319,900 FUND 126 REET 1 13 New Item Land Bank Contribution $500,000 Impacts to Fund 126 Ending Cash $500,000 Total Councilmember Requested Changes $819,900 Item 13: Historic Preservation Intern - $6,000 Council President Johnson relayed Planning Manager Rob Chave estimating that a summer student intern could be hired at $15/hour for 10 weeks. The primary mission of the HPC is to add historic houses to the historic register; however, due to their reliance on surveys and volunteer help, it has not progressed. This would assist the HPC with adding homes to the historic registry. She strongly supported this funding request. Councilmember Buckshnis requested Councilmember Teitzel, liaison to the HPC, comment on this proposal. Councilmember Teitzel said the HPC feels they can narrow their focus and begin moving ahead but it will require a recommitment by the commissioners. He preferred to allow the HPC to work through that internal process and get refocused before spending money on an intern. He was not fundamentally opposed to the proposal but preferred to allow the HPC to work through their internal process. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested this be delayed until the end of the budget to see if was any money left over for an HPC intern. The City has many boards and commissions that could use extra help and she agreed with Councilmember Teitzel it may not be the correct time to allocate funds for an intern. Council President Johnson strongly disagreed, explaining she has been on the have been on HPC for 51/2 - 6 years and every year they try to reorganize and reinvigorate their efforts but there are only about 18 houses on the historic register. Any reorganization can certainly accommodate a 10-week student intern to help with adding houses to the register. Councilmember Tibbott preferred to focus on the 11 projects that the Western Washington University students will be working on in 2017, and reconsider an intern in 2018 which he noted would sequence well with the HPC efforts. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmembers Tibbott and Fraley-Monillas. She noted this could be considered for funding in the summer from the $20,000 Council Contingency. She did not support this funding request. Councilmember Teitzel respected and appreciated Council President Johnson's comments and was reluctant to turn down money for the HPC However, he preferred to hear from the HPC their plans for using an intern and to date had not heard that request. He preferred to allow the HPC to consider the use of an intern after their focus has been refined. Council President Johnson said she would be happy to bring this funding request forward at either the end of this budget process or during the summer. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 9 Packet Pg. 25 5.2.a Councilmember Nelson expressed support for the request. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NELSON, TO ALLOCATE $6,000 FOR THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO ADD HISTORIC HOUSES TO THE HISTORIC REGISTER. MOTION FAILED (2-5), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND COUNCILMEMBER NELSON VOTING YES. Item 4: Pedestrian Safety Training - $15,000 COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO SUPPORT THIS ITEM. Councilmember Buckshnis said she has found money in the budget to support this. Councilmember Tibbott was encouraged money had been identified in the budget for safety training but was interested in a more comprehensive plan for the entire City. In addition to pedestrian safety ideas, he was interested in a public process to determine citizens' support for a citywide plan. He realized $15,000 may not go far, but it will scratch the surface. Councilmember Nelson said the budget reflects the Council's priorities; pedestrian and traffic safety should be priorities. As Michael Reagan, a member of the pedestrian safety task force, stated, the task force has a lot of great ideas but cannot execute them without funds. The group is making presentations and has developed a PowerPoint regarding being a defensive pedestrian but they need money for educational materials and guidance. He expressed support for this funding request. Council President Johnson commented safety should always be the Council's number one concern. She asked what the pedestrian safety training program will involve, noting Mayor Earling established an ad hoc pedestrian safety committee this year. She hoped to reinstitute the transportation committee which is already authorized in the City code, and do training via that committee. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas expressed support for this funding request, recalling the pedestrian safety commission was started due to two deaths and multiple near misses and injuries in pedestrian/vehicle accidents. She referred to Mr. Reagan's indication that the committee needs to do more than just talk, they should be able identify projects to protect citizens. In response to Council President Johnson's question, she recalled there were plans for conducting training with children and seniors as children are very vulnerable and several of the accidents involved seniors. Councilmember Teitzel was supportive of the notion of pedestrian safety but was interested in more detail regarding how the funds would be used. In listening to Mr. Regan's testimony, it appeared much of the $15,000 might go toward improving pedestrian safety on Olympic View Drive. Mayor Earling asked about the funding source. Councilmember Buckshnis said she anticipated the Council would be reviewing the decision packages where she has identified some expenditures that could be delayed a year. Mayor Earling said he did not object to that effort, but he would like to know the source as it may be something important to staff or a program. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested Councilmember Buckshnis provide a list of cost savings to fund this program at the next Council meeting. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the Council has never done this before; she recalled in the past Councilmembers have proposed amendments without identifying a funding source. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 10 Packet Pg. 26 COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. VOTE ON THE CALL FOR THE QUESTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Item 3: Add Traffic Officer - $120,600 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas remind this is the Council's budget; the Mayor presents the budget and the Council reviews and makes their requests. She was uncomfortable with debating whether funds are available for the Council requested items when the Council has not reviewed the Mayor's budget to determine whether funds are available. She agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis that that was a change from the way it was done in the past. Mr. James said he was providing the list of items the Council requested so citizens had an opportunity to see them and provide comment. No additional amendments have been proposed. Councilmember Nelson explained he requested this item because it's a basic, common experience to anyone driving or walking that not everyone is abiding by traffic laws. Education is a component but engineering and enforcement are also necessary. Having four traffic enforcement officers, one on any given day during the daytime, in a city of 40,000 people is not enough. Councilmember Tibbott expressed interest in input from the pedestrian safety group regarding this request and from Chief Compaan. From his perspective, the Police Department does a great job of enforcement; areas that need additional enforcement should be brought to the Chief's attention. He preferred to see the pedestrian safety training program proceed including a comprehensive citywide plan and then see if there is a need for another traffic enforcement officer. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas agreed a traffic officer was warranted and needed; one may not be enough, two may be needed. There are traffic issues throughout the City; they are visible standing on any corner. Police staff are doing their jobs, but there are just not enough for a city Edmonds' size and that need will increase as the City grows. She reminded these are the Council's priorities; it is up to the Mayor and his staff to fund them. No other legislative body determines how to fund their priorities. The Council sets the priorities and administration determines how to fund them. Councilmember Teitzel commented when he lived in Woodway, there was very little tolerance for speeding. The speed limit throughout Woodway is 25 mph; a driver going 28 mph runs a strong risk of getting a citation from the one police officer. It may be in part an issue of philosophy about how much grace is given to speeders. As a frequent driver on 9th to SR-104 where the speed limit is 30 mph, he often sees drivers going 40 mph, which is too much grace in his opinion. That same issue exists on 76th and several other streets. He suggested working with the Police Department on the philosophical issue of how much grace is given to speeders to see what impact that has before adding to the Police Department budget and if that was not effective, then fund another officer. The proposed position is $121,000 and will increase every year. He did not support this funding request. Mayor Earling respected Councilmember Fraley-Monillas' comments, noting every time new staff is added, it accelerates the budget for the future. He was very careful to emphasis in budget that he was interested in one-time expenditures that would be successful and there were very few additional staff other than four positions. He agreed it was Council's decision. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was on the fence with this request; she agreed with Councilmember Teitzel after reviewing the numbers and a long discussion with Chief Compaan who said he does not have the infrastructure for another position. She suggested considering this as well as parking enforcement in a Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 11 Packet Pg. 27 5.2.a committee format next year. This request was a lot of money and she was uncertain where the funds would be found. Council President Johnson agreed it was a good idea but did not know how it fit with the overall Police Department scheme of things, where the additional officer would be utilized, whether it would be motorcycle or traffic vehicle, etc. She wondered whether it could be accomplished without spending $121,600. Councilmember Mesaros appreciated Councilmember Nelson's comments, for a city of 40,000, Edmonds should do a better job of guarding pedestrians and making it a safe place to live, walk and travel. He was also on the fence; his heart wants vote to yes but his head says ponder it a little more and allow Chief Compaan to give the Council guidance and direction. If the Council does not approve this request, he hoped it would be discussed further in 2017. If an additional officer was needed, he preferred to add it in 2018 in a thoughtful manner rather than in a rush. COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT OFFICER TO THE BUDGET. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON AND FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, MESAROS, TEITZEL AND TIBBOTT VOTING NO. Item 2: Add Parking Enforcement Officer - $82,300 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said businesses and citizens have stated the need for better parking enforcement. Edmonds, the third largest city in Snohomish County, currently has a 0.5 FTE doing parking enforcement. She assured the issue was much larger than downtown; although downtown was a very important part because if people cannot park, they do not shop downtown. There are other parts of Edmonds with abandoned cars, people living in motorhomes as well as a serious need for parking enforcement. Many businesses have indicated visitors are unable to visit their shops or restaurants because they cannot find parking. She sent the Council an email from a downtown business in early 2010 regarding this same issue. She appreciated the Police Department brought in a part-time parking enforcement officer but that was not enough to cover the entire City. She encouraged the Council to support this for a year; during that year she has requested research be done on potentially contracting out parking enforcement. Other cities in the state have private parking enforcement that takes a percentage of the ticket revenue. She has been told that cannot be done in Edmonds as it will cause problems with the unions but there must be a way because other cities, some larger than Edmonds, do it. She viewed this as a temporary fix until next year when consideration can be given to hiring a private agency for parking enforcement. COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON, TO ADD A FULL-TIME PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FOR 2017 ONLY. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the City could hire an enforcement officer for one year. Human Resources Director Mary Ann Hardie answered it would have to be discussed with the union because a standalone position does not currently exist in the union contract. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the City could contract with someone for one year outside the union contract. Ms. Hardie said that item of work is considered bargaining unit work, hiring outside the contract likely would result in an unfair labor practice. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the City could hire a parking enforcement officer for one year. Ms. Hardie answered it would have to be discussed with the union and the union would have to agree to do that. Council President Johnson asked whether the animal control/parking enforcement officer was something the City was bound to by union contract or was there some flexibility. The Council is finding there is not Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 12 Packet Pg. 28 5.2.a sufficient parking enforcement with the current arrangement. Ms. Hardie answered making a substantial change to the essential functions of represented positions that are negotiated with union would require discussion/bargaining with the unions. Councilmember Mesaros recalled during discussions at previous meetings Chief Compaan described plans to increase parking enforcement. He recalled tonight Councilmember Fraley-Monillas stated there currently is 0.5 FTE. He requested Chief Compaan restate his plans for 2017. Chief Compaan explained at currently one of two animal control/parking enforcement/ordinance enforcement officer positions is filled. The open position has been advertised and staff is in the process of reviewing applications and interviewing to fill the second FTE. A retiree was brought back to do 19 hours/week of strictly parking enforcement. The retiree has indicated her plans to leave toward the end of December which will leave two full-time animal control/parking enforcement/ordinance enforcement officers. On average they are able to devote about 25% of their time to parking enforcement which is approximately equivalent to 0.5 FTE for parking enforcement. Councilmember Mesaros referred to Councilmember Fraley-Monillas' comments about abandoned cars and people living in motorhomes and asked how serious an issue that was in Edmonds. Chief Compaan answered there has been some of that; typically, a patrol officer responds if a vehicle is occupied. Either a patrol officer or parking enforcement can deal with abandoned vehicles. The problem has been sporadic and the Police Department has worked with Public Works on posting areas where people have chosen to park and live out of their vehicles. Officers try to move them along and find alternate places. It has not been a huge issue in Edmonds; it is a much larger issue in other areas of Puget Sound. Councilmember Mesaros asked if adding a parking enforcement officer would make that less of an issue. Chief Compaan did not envision it would have a huge impact on that issue; the most impact would be making the rounds for overtime parking, particularly downtown. Councilmember Teitzel recalled Chief Compaan saying some personnel issues had been resolved with regard to the parking enforcement/animal control officer, allowing it to operate more smoothly in the future and have more overtime parking enforcement than in the past. Chief Compaan was confident the officers could replicate the track record over the past 5-6 years of approximately 1,000 parking citations/year which he acknowledged was not a huge number on a daily basis. The issue may be a Council policy and budget decision regarding resources devoted to parking enforcement. In discussions with members of the business community and Councilmembers, another approach could be to add a part- time parking enforcement employee but the question is how to fund the position. Councilmember Teitzel commented in an ideal world parking tickets would not be necessary and there would be 100% voluntary compliance. It may be necessary to let drivers know that the parking limits will be enforced and they may get a citation. It appears to be an ongoing problem that has not been getting better and writing three tickets/day is not sufficient. However, he was concerned with adding a full-time officer. As Councilmember Fraley-Monillas mentioned, other cities such as Bellevue have contracted parking enforcement. He was willing to give Chief Compaan six months and see how things go. He requested an update on the number of citations that have been issued and if the Council feels not enough is being done, look at contracting or something else. Chief Compaan said the Police Department is more than willing to work with the Council or a Council committee on this issue and will do their best to respond. Councilmember Nelson thanked Chief Compaan for his suggestion of a part-time parking enforcement officer. He was supportive of that as long as it was an addition and did not reduce any other Police Department budgetary requests. A part-time officer would be something tangible that would make a difference. The Council needs to determine how to fund it. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 13 Packet Pg. 29 5.2.a Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented the Police Department has had the same staffing pattern with 75% animal control and 25% parking enforcement since she has been on Council. If that continues, there will not be any change. One of the issues is if the officer is on an animal control call, they cannot drop what they're doing to do parking enforcement. As a result, parking does not receive the attention it should. In response to Councilmember Mesaros, she did not say there were parking issues related to abandoned cars and motorhomes all over the City, it was primarily in one area. Along Highway 99, several neighborhoods are impacted by commuters who park and take the bus on Highway 99 because there is little transit parking. Neighborhoods are also seeing abandoned cars; a car on her street sat in the travel lane for four days before someone called the police. Without enforcement, there is no control and unless something different is done, there will be no change downtown or in other areas. She supported adding a part-time or full-time parking enforcement officer. Councilmember Nelson asked the cost of a part-time parking enforcement officer. Chief Compaan estimated it would be half the full-time officer or $40,000 annually. As Ms. Hardie indicated, the position would have to be negotiated with the guild because there is currently no job description for a part-time parking enforcement officer. For Councilmember Nelson, Chief Compaan said parking enforcement would be this person's sole job, replicating what the ad hoc part-time person is doing. COUNCILMEMBER NELSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO A PART-TIME PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. Council President Johnson said the City had a parking committee led by Karen Wiggins for approximately 15 years and she served on committee at one time. If the only method used is the chalk system, the officer needs to be present for more than three hours to issue a ticket. If the officer has an animal control call, they lose the ability to ticket vehicles. GPS ticket technology, used by Seattle and other cities, could improve parking enforcement. She suggested if the transportation committee were reinstated, they could look at parking, pedestrian safety and technology to increase parking enforcement. Councilmember Nelson commented a dedicated parking enforcement officer will increase revenue to downtown businesses by having cars move more frequently resulting in more shoppers. In addition, the position will generate revenue via tickets to offset the cost of the officer. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. James suggested Council propose any additions/amendments to the budget and staff will prepare a list for consideration at the Council meeting in two weeks. Reconsider: Pedestrian Safety Corridor — Pine Street Councilmember Mesaros commented tonight the Council went through an important exercise, taking public comment. Six people commented on the budget during Audience Comments about pedestrian safety on one street in the City that is extremely dark and gets darker when it's raining hard. He enjoyed the discussion and the Council's passion about pedestrian safety training. He knew one of individuals who testified, she walks throughout the City and he often meets her while walking, but he did not realize she had fallen in that area. COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NELSON, TO REINSTATE THE COUNCIL REQUEST FOR $20,000 FOR STREET LIGHTS ON PINE STREET. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 14 Packet Pg. 30 5.2.a Council President Johnson raised a point of order; only a person voting on the prevailing side can ask for reconsideration. Councilmember Mesaros said his motion was not to reconsider, it was to consider putting $20,000 in the budget. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed that was the same motion that did not pass so it is a motion to reconsider. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said it is technically not a motion to reconsider because it happened at the last meeting and reconsideration only applies at the same meeting. Therefore, this is a renewal not reconsideration and is not out of order. Councilmember Mesaros reiterated when the Council asks for citizen comment, the Council should listen and be responsive. The focus of public comments tonight was public safety and 80% on this one item. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said the Council is sensitive to citizens walking in dark areas. She asked how many streets there were in the City with no lighting and whether there was any way to track them. Mr. Williams answered there was nothing in GIS to identify those areas. He was certain the location identified during public comment was not only place without lighting, particularly local, residential streets although Pine was not really a local, residential street. It is not uncommon to have gaps in the lighting on local streets because most streetlights are on PUD poles. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked how to balance so it not just a Councilmember's neighborhood that gets crosswalks or lighting. Mr. Williams answered the if citizens call and want a light in a particular location, staff identifies a PUD pole with electricity and as long as the City is willing to accept the $9/month bill, staff arranges with PUD to have the light installed. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas recalled that had been done in City parks. She asked whether the Pine Street area had PUD poles. Mr. Williams answered no, poles will need to be installed. If this was approved, in an effort to keep the cost down, staff will provide the labor to trench between the poles and install the conduit; PUD would pull the wires and install the lights. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said after hearing concerns of citizens walking in the dark, she questioned how to balance that with other neighborhoods' needs, whether to take each neighborhood as they came forward. She recalled in areas that need sidewalks, there is priority established. Mr. Williams said lighting is different than sidewalks; the City inventories sidewalks and identifies and prioritizes missing sections. That has not been done with streetlights. The City owns very few streetlights so are somewhat at the mercy of PUD to keep the streets lit. He agreed there were dark spots on other streets where lights can be installed on PUD poles at the request of a citizen or a group of citizens. He pointed out not all neighborhoods want streetlights; if there are no sidewalks and the street is short, the light can be intrusive, especially sodium vapor lights that were used in the past. Most new lights are LED which allows much better control of the lighting pattern. This dark section of Pine Street is unusually long because there are no houses in the area and the hatchery is on one side and a wooded area on the other side. If there were homes in that area, he assumed there would already be lights. People walk though this area to reach a fairly densely developed area. He concluded it was a meritorious request. Councilmember Buckshnis recognized citizens from that area also emailed the Council. There are several areas in her neighborhoods that have no lighting where it is extremely dark such as Hutt park where people walking use a flashlight. It appears by the information staff has prepared that a determination has already been made to facilitate a Councilmember's request. Mr. Williams said after receiving a lot of same emails from the Pt. Edwards neighborhood a year and half ago, long before Councilmember Mesaros made this funding request, staff explored options and costs with PUD so that information was available when this request was made. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Council President Johnson's request regarding alternatives such as solar or something less costly. She expressed concern with the cost, $20,000 for 100 feet. Mr. Williams said the distance is much more than 100 feet, likely 300-350 feet; there would be 4 poles 100 feet apart. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 15 Packet Pg. 31 5.2.a Council President Johnson referred to testimony during Audience Comments that soon there will be 536 units in this area. Dividing those units by the $20,000, the cost of the lighting for each unit is $37.31. She asked whether the homeowners' association could assess themselves to pay for the lighting. Mr. Williams recalled the testimony was 536 people not units. This section of Pine Street is in the public domain, Pt. Edwards property owners do not own property in this area so there is no one to assess in an LID. Pt. Edward is responsible for all the lighting further up the street and around the new building and existing buildings. The area of concern is between SR-104 and 300-400 feet up the street. The proposed project seemed to be the smallest public investment necessary to provide lighting for that section. Council President Johnson commented it was a question of equity and fairness; when she walks, she carries a flashlight. For Councilmember Tibbott, Mr. Williams explained PUD will install the lights and the four locations will be added to the City's bill, approximately $9/month each. Councilmember Tibbott asked if utility fees on the lights would pay back the amount invested. Mr. Williams said streetlights are paid from Fund 111, the City pays approximately $250,000/year to PUD for streetlights they operate in Edmonds. The monthly charge per light varies depending on the wattage. Councilmember Tibbott commented there was new information provided tonight. He did not like the process of this coming to the Council at the last minute. He was dismayed staff had been receiving emails for 1 %2 years and had developed a rudimentary plan but had not presented it as a budget item. He walks in the Hutt Park area where there are only about 100 cars/day; on Pine Street there could be 100 cars/hour. There is greater traffic volume on Pine Street and it appears there was a plan oversight when the neighborhood was constructed not to include lighting in that area. Although it was unfortunate this had been brought to Council in this manner, he found the project worthy. He requested in the future similar lighting requests be addressed in a more immediate way rather than during the budget discussion. He supported the motion based on new information provided tonight. Councilmember Nelson said although carrying a flashlight was something everyone should do when walking at night, it should not be the City's policy in lieu of providing street lights. There will always will be instances where a long, well -thought out process would be preferable but there will also be times when things are brought up at the last minute. The fact is there is a problem, people are telling the Council there is a problem and they are asking the Council to something about it. This is an unusual location and circumstance and he supported the motion. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said in her investigation of this area, she noticed the east side of Pine Street was equally as dark and asked if consideration could be given to installing in that location as well. Mr. Williams said staff is willing to work with any citizen or group of citizens that desires lighting on their street. The difference on the east side of Pine Street is the homes there may not want additional lighting; staff has not received any requests from that neighborhood or any of the other neighborhoods that have been mentioned. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas described the up and back route someone walking on Pine Street must follow to use the crosswalk at SR-104. She would like to have a streetlight on other side of the street. Mr. Williams said it would be considered. Councilmember Teitzel appreciated citizens taking the time to make their heartfelt comments. However, if this had been a public hearing about street lighting throughout Edmonds, he anticipated there would be a room full of people talking about the need for streetlights. After hearing from a small group of citizens, their request becomes the top priority and he was not sure that was how this should work and how the City's scarce resources should be prioritized although he was very sympathetic to the need for lighting. As he said last week, he was concerned about light spillage into the marsh area. The Council has talked at length about the sensitivity of the marsh and that the wildlife in the marsh that like dark spaces. These two Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 16 Packet Pg. 32 5.2.a reasons give him pause about approving this request, particularly this lighting request becoming the top of priority when other areas may need lighting more. In response to Councilmember Teitzel's remarks about light spillage, Councilmember Mesaros suggested lighting on Pine Street would not be create more light spillage than the existing floodlight in the middle of the hatchery. In addition, existing lights on SR-104 spill into the marsh area. He concluded light spillage from Pine Street was not really an issue. He typically walks to City Council meetings on that section of Pine Street; the east side of Pine has more light due to light from the houses. He recommended the Council approve this request as it satisfies a need. In response to Councilmembers' concern with process, he referred to other requests such as the radar speed trailer, parking enforcement and social worker which had had very little process but yet Councilmembers were comfortable with approving them. COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. VOTE ON THE CALL FOR THE QUESTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION CARRIED (4-2-1), COUNCILMEMBERS NELSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS, MESAROS AND TIBBOTT VOTING YES; COUNCIL PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING NO; AND COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS ABSTAINING. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Decision Package 46 on page 146, $8,000 for tree maintenance in Public Works and the significant increase in supplies repairs, maintenance on page 147, relaying she was certain the $8,000 for tree maintenance was in the supplies, repairs and maintenance budget. As there is an arborist in Parks & Recreation Department and Parks & Recreation can purchase trees for Public Works, she recommended removing Decision Package 46. She pointed out the budget for supplies has increased from $240,000 in 2016 to $330,000 in 2017; repairs and maintenance has increased from $45,000 to $52,000. She concluded there was room in those budgets for $8,000 for tree maintenance. She did not have sufficient information for the $8,000 for tree maintenance and did not feel it was warranted. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO REMOVE DECISION PACKAGE 46. Council President Johnson pointed out this was a fourth level priority. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT VOTING NO. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to decision packages on pages 142-143. For example, Decision Package 34 added $5,000 to 2017 costs for additional rental/lease budget; she cited the history of the rental/lease budge: $658 in 2015 actual, $500 in the 2016 budget, $1300 for 2016 estimate and $10,000 in the 2017 budget. As she wanted better figures on that number, she recommended deleting Decision Package 34. Mr. Williams said as the budget discussion has been underway for a period of time and these are detailed questions, he would have preferred an email so he could provide a detailed answer. He was not prepared to go through his budget line by line tonight. Councilmember Buckshnis said she thought she had sent Mr. Williams all her line by line questions. Mr. Williams answered no, staff responded to all Councilmember Buckshnis' questions via Mr. James who emailed all Councilmembers. Mr. James pointed out the rental/lease was already reduced from $10,000 to $5,000; Item 11 on the list of Council Requested Budget Changes. Councilmember Buckshnis said she would have to re -ask her questions that address anomalies in the numbers. Mayor Earling suggested Councilmember Buckshnis meet with staff to resolve these issues. Mr. James commented the discussion regarding Pine Street lighting took 25 minutes. He reiterated his request Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 17 Packet Pg. 33 5.2.a for Councilmembers to provide a list of requested changes to give staff and citizens time to react and staff an opportunity to respond at the next meeting. Council President Johnson said this was the Council's opportunity to review decision packages; she suggested it be done systematically and quickly. Councilmember Tibbott observed now that the list of Council requests has been reviewed and acted on, there is $100,000 for Council allocation and another $21,000 was identified via discrepancies. He suggested staff determine whether there were additional savings in the decision packages to cover the requested items. He was more comfortable having staff identify what could be trimmed from the decision packages rather than Council going line by line. Mr. James said over the past week, staff identified approximately $250,000 in additional savings. He reminded of the retro bill the City received from FD1 in the past, anticipating a similar situation will occur due to FD1's unsettled contract. The budget includes $582,000 for the anticipated FD1 retro but he expected that would not be enough and recommended putting aside another $200,000 for that purpose. He summarized although $250,000 in savings was identified in the budget, he preferred to save $200,000 for the FD1 bill which leaves $50,000 for the Council to allocate. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was only providing examples. She suggested Mr. Williams explain why the budget increased so substantially in supplies, repair and maintenance. She was unlikely to change her opinion about the request to add $8,000 for tree maintenance when the rationale for that number was not provided. She referred to errors she identified on page 143, commenting had she not identified them, they would have been included in the budget. She apologized for being overly technical and offered to re - ask her questions, noting she has five suggested amendments. Mr. James suggested Councilmembers identify their amendments, staff will prepare a list and research the amendments for Council consideration at the next meeting. Mayor Earling agreed with Mr. James' suggestion and suggested Council identify how they wanted to allocate the $121,000. Mr. James summarized there is $100,000 in Council discretionary funds in the budget, $21,000 in corrections and $50,000 in savings identified by staff, a total of $171,000. Councilmember Buckshnis asked the source of the additional $50,000. Mr. James answered staff reviewed the budget for possible savings and identified an additional $50,000 in unused 2016 budget. He clarified staff identified $250,000 of which he recommended $200,000 be set aside for FD1. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas thanked Councilmember Buckshnis for her work, recognizing it is a thankless job. When she reviewing the budget, she did not notice that rental/lease had increased from $658 in 2015 to $1300 in 2016 to $10,000 in 2017, a 669% increase. She expressed appreciation for the work Councilmember Buckshnis does, noting without it, the Council could have missed that. Mr. James suggested Councilmember Buckshnis share the five amendments so that staff can prepare a list. Councilmember Buckshnis said she shared the one regarding tree maintenance. She requested Mr. Williams explain the need for that amount. Council President Johnson inquired about the cost to the City of the SRO, noting it appears to be budgeted for 100% staffing although the description states the intent is 50150 cost share with the school district beginning in September and backfilling of a previous officer and training for a new officer. Chief Compaan answered the school district will contribute $53,280 which is a 50150 cost share of the salary and benefits as well as a portion of the vehicle expense during the school year. During the balance of the year when school was not in session, the officer would be available full-time to the department and the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 18 Packet Pg. 34 5.2.a school district would not fund that portion. Council President Johnson asked whether that included school holidays and vacations. Chief Compaan answered during the summer when school is not in session. Council President Johnson asked what the SRO did during scheduled school vacations. Chief Compaan answered the SRO often uses his/her own vacation/leave or would work patrol. Council President Johnson commented it was possible the SRO could do things like pedestrian safety training as part of their other duties. Chief Compaan said that would fall within the category of other duties as assigned. Council President Johnson commented even though the officer will not be in the school until September, training would be required. Chief Compaan explained a new officer will be hired and trained for patrol; a veteran officer would be selected and assigned as the SRO September 1. He summarized it takes time to ramp up for the SRO position Councilmember Mesaros inquired about Councilmember Buckshnis' other amendments. He agreed Councilmember Buckshnis has done the Council a service by reviewing the budget and developing questions. Councilmember Buckshnis preferred to put her amendments in writing to Mr. Williams. She noted if there is an additional $50,000 available, the difference with the Council Requests Changes is only approximately $2,150. Mr. James pointed out the $20,000 Council Contingency has not allocated. Councilmember Buckshnis said the expenditures from Council Contingency are from the 2016 Council Contingency. She planned to propose an amendment to the budget book to separate travel and miscellaneous in the Council budget. She will send her questions to staff. 8. REPORTS ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS Councilmember Tibbott reported on the Community Health meeting at Providence Hospital, a fascinating meeting regarding mental health resources in the area. Providence is interested in having a social worker in the emergency room to identify problems before they escalate. He anticipated there will be a more proactive approach to homeless and mental health in Edmonds and in Snohomish County. Councilmember Tibbott reported the Snohomish County Tomorrow meeting included a presentation regarding restoration of the 400-acre Qwuloolt Estuary north of Marysville. He circulated a mug he received and invited Councilmembers to pronounce Qwuloolt. He reported the Economic Development Commission (EDC) meeting included discussion regarding ideas related to parking in addition to enforcement. The EDC has provided the Council a memo with a summary of their ideas and he suggested having an EDC member provide a report to Council. Councilmember Tibbott reported on the BID meeting that he and Councilmembers Nelson and Teitzel attended where they described their marketing plans and discussed the sign code issue. He and his wife attended the League of Women Voters, "Our Children Are Not for Sale" and watched a documentary filmed in Seattle about sex trafficking, "The Long Night." A detective on the FBI Task Force who spoke at the event affirmed she is working sex trafficking cases in every high school in the area. As it is a Seattle -based documentary, he suggested it was worthwhile for Councilmembers to watch and offered to provide a link to the video. see. His wife works with a group Seattle Against Slavery. He asked the detective if a social worker in the Police Department would help with this issue. Her response was no, the City could have more impact by having a social worker help with housing and support for girls who are coming out of that life. He suggested working with the involved entities to understand how best to utilize the City's social worker. Councilmember Mesaros reported in addition to attending the Seashore Transportation Forum and the Public Facilities District meeting, Chief Compaan invited him to attend the SNOCOM/SNOPAC Joint Task Force meeting. The Task Force has narrowed 12-13 options to 4 options: • Option 1: Status Quo Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 19 Packet Pg. 35 5.2.a o Agencies stand alone, work more closely together Option 2: Eliminate the demarcation line between SNOCOM and SNOPAC o Agencies remain standalone. Calls in jointly served area rerouted to either SNOCOM or SNOPAC Option 3: Aggressive Cross PSAP Processing o Agencies remain stand-alone and fully process all CAD entries for the 911 calls they receive Option 4: Full consolidation o Fully consolidated agency with one or two facilities Councilmember Mesaros explained the issues being discussed include finances, improving service, structure of governance and structure of the entity. Currently SNOPAC board members are all fire or police professionals and SNOCOM board members are a mix of elected officials and professionals. He and Chief Compaan will make a presentation to the Council at a future meeting, anticipating at some point there will be a vote on the consolidation. Councilmember Teitzel reported the Disability Board is working on policies to limit the City's financial exposure while fully meeting the needs of the LEOFF 1 retirees such as requiring the retiree to first utilize a generic prescription. Councilmember Teitzel reported the Diversity Commission meeting included interviews of three candidates for one open position. All three candidates were outstanding; the candidate the Commission selects will be forwarded to Council for interview and approval. He reported the Planning Board public hearing regarding Civic Field included a great deal of public comment and engagement in the final design elements and locating elements in places that create the least noise issue with nearby neighbors. Councilmember Teitzel reported the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is working on the potential listing of a home at P & Caspers on the local historic register. The HPC also discussed the interpretive panels, funded via the Council Contingency Fund, to be installed at the south end of Sunset and in Yost Park. The HPC wants to ensure their name is on panels to publicize the HPC. As mentioned earlier, the HPC will be reassessing commissioners' functions and working together to do historic assessments, etc. Council President Johnson reported the Highway 99 open house was well attended for a dark and stormy night and the attendees provided feedback for the consultant. She also attended the South County Cities dinner where the focus was the legislative agenda for next session; the City's legislative consultant Jennifer Ziegler will make a presentation to the Council in December. She attended the TEDx Talks sponsored by the Sno-Isle Library which she noted are available online. She attended two Port of Edmonds Commission meetings; the Port is developing an informational piece highlighting their work that will be mailed to the entire City of Edmonds. The Port reported they are in black in Harbor Square, have new rentals and are 90% rented. Councilmember Buckshnis reported on the Tree Board; the Arbor Day planting was fabulous even though all the volunteers did not show up. Julia Munger, Herrera, is assisting the Tree Board with the Tree City USA application. Tree Board members will be going to Tree Board University, a course on trees, cooperation and coordination, etc. She reported the WRIA 8 meeting included approval of their budget and a video presentation regarding projects including one in Issaquah that many were originally opposed to but once it was constructed was supported by the community. She displayed a "Living with Salmon in King County" brochure. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas reported she has seen the sex trafficking documentary. She remarked there have been females freed from hotels on Highway 99 by the Edmonds Police Department. She attended a Veterans Day celebration in Seattle; next year Edmonds can have its own Veterans Day Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 20 Packet Pg. 36 5.2.a celebration at the Veteran's Plaza. She attended three Snohomish Health District meetings; the district is exploring reorganization. She also attended the Highway 99 open house, and she thanked Teresa Wippel, My Edmonds News, for videoing it. She remarked on how multicultural the people attending the open house were, a good representation of people who live near Highway 99. She also attended the South County City dinner with Mayor Earling and Council President Johnson. Councilmember Nelson reported on the Ed! meeting, where in addition to talking about the sign code, they reported new baskets are being designed to replace the existing umbrellas holders because in addition to the umbrellas disappearing, the baskets are being used as garbage cans. He also attended the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee meeting where they discussed the 2017 budget; 2016 was another banner year for lodging tax so the LTAC's 2017 budget has also increased. Councilmember Nelson reported on the Snohomish County Emergency Radio Service (SERS) Board meeting; a new network, FirstNet (First Responder Network Authority), an independent government agency created by Congress in 2012, sets aside $7 billion for a wireless network spectrum. They will partner with existing telecommunication structures and dedicate a certain portion to police and fire during emergencies. Depending on usage during an emergency, broadband communications will automatically be downgraded to increase police and fire communication. 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported on his first opportunity to attend the holiday market on Saturday; it was very fun and he encouraged the pubic to visit. He also encouraged the pubic to attend the Tree Lighting ceremony on Saturday at 5:00-ish. He reported the City is getting close to resolution of negotiations with FDL A public hearing is scheduled on December 6 where the consultant, Fitch & Associates, will make a presentation. Council will receive a draft copy of the agreement although details are still being worked out. Following the presentation and public hearing on December 6, he was hopeful the Council could take action at the December 13 meeting. He wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS Reflecting on the upcoming Thanksgiving and the times we live in, Councilmember Nelson described when Thanksgiving was first declared a national holiday: 1863, U.S. citizens were at war with each other, the Battle at Gettysburg had just finished, the largest loss of life in one battle in the Civil War, a turning point where the Union Army would go on to defeat the Confederacy and all it stood for. President Lincoln, always looking for opportunity for unity, declared Thanksgiving a national holiday to promote unity. Councilmember Nelson wished that Thanksgiving will once again provide a period of unity in a time when the country is clearly divided. He hoped as the country moved forward, everyone worked on what unites us, not what divides us. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. Councilmember Buckshnis echoed Councilmember Nelson's comments and wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. She reiterated there will be a public hearing on the City's contract with FD1 on December 6; the Council is not meeting next week, November 29. She urged citizens to watch for information regarding FD1 as the Council wanted to hear the public's comments. Council President Johnson wished everyone Happy Thanksgiving. She requested Councilmembers forward any questions about the budget to Mr. James for distribution. Councilmember Teitzel said he was feeling very thankful as both his daughters will be home for Thanksgiving. He was especially thankful to be living in a great city like Edmonds and he would not want Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 21 Packet Pg. 37 5.2.a to live anywhere else. He thanked Councilmembers for the great work they've done this year and wished the Council, staff and citizens Happy Thanksgiving. Councilmember Mesaros said Thanksgiving is his favorite holiday, a great time to be with family, eat and play games. Councilmember Tibbott was thankful and glad the county could celebrate Thanksgiving. He wished everyone Happy Thanksgiving. He and his wife visited the holiday market spur of moment but found parking place. The market is fantastic and the restrooms are operational. Mayor Earling pointed out the restrooms are not always open as work is still being done; they are open during market. Councilmember Tibbott remarked the restrooms are industrial strength and built to last. 11. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 12. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 13. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:03 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 22, 2016 Page 22 Packet Pg. 38 5.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments. Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #222899 through #223016 dated November 23, 2016 for $458,480.44 (re- issued check #222942 $104.92) and checks #223017 through #223094 dated December 1, 2016 for $331,499.14 (re -issued check #223063 $4,062.60). Approval of payments for Holiday buy back (checks #62406 through #62460) for Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees and Law Enforcement Support Service Employees in the amount of $140,395.74 and Kelly buy back (checks #62461 through 62498) for Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees in the amount of $41,976.24 per union contracts. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #62499 through #62507 for $539,935.17 (re -issued check #62499), benefit checks #62508 through #62516 and wire payments of $589,475.95 for the pay period November 16, 2016 through November 30, 2016. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments. Fiscal Impact Claims $789,979.58 Re -issued checks $4,167.52 Payroll Holiday buy back $140,395.74 Kelly buy back $41,976.24 Employee checks and wire payments $539,935.17 Benefit checks and wire payments $589,475.95 Re -issued check $3,230.04 Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claim cks 11-23-16 Packet Pg. 39 5.3 claim cks 12-01-16 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 12-01-16 payroll summary holiday payroll summary kelly payroll summary 12-05-16 payroll benefit 12-05-16 payroll summary reissue Packet Pg. 40 5.3.a vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 0781 COUNCIL CREDIT CARD AWC Event Registration Fee 5 @ $4E 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 Food/Drink for Meeting 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 Office Depot - Planner - Office Supplii 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 Fee for Caterer for Volunteer 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 1865 HOME DEPOT - FAC MAINT - SUPPI Home Depot - Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Office Max - File Folders 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Kaivac - Fac Maint - Spray Gun 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Home Depot - City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 QFC - Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Offic Max - Fac Maint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Pagiacci Pizza - Fac Maint - Meeting 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Svc Fees 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2519 INV#2519 11/7/16 - POLICE DEPT 1- CREDIT FOR CHGS PAID BY OFFIC 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 2519 INV#2519 11/07/16 - POLICE DEPT ' Page: c ca lid U a� Amoun N 0 a m U 225.0( =a 12.51 V a) c 22.9E M c 1,030.0( cu 0 L 2.2' ns Q 98.8: E ns w 105.9< 0 25.1E o 0- 0. 93.4E Q 14.5E i 47.4z t° r M 35.6� r N 111.1 E 6.5- r c -67.61 E t R .r r Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 41 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) VARIDESK - RICHARDSON 001.000.41.521.11.35.00 FERRY CHARGE 10/6/16 #16-24503 001.000.41.521.21.43.00 DUAL MONITOR ARMS -DETECTIVE 001.000.41.521.21.35.00 LODGING-COLL RECONST-SACKVI 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 2674 AMAZON PRIME REFUNDED WITH Amazon Prime Refunded with Fees 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2674 HOME DEPOT - UNIT G01 - HOSE Home Depot - Unit G01 - Hose 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Home Depot - Unit 27 - Keyless Entry 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Amsoil - Unit 38 - Oil 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Cruiser Customizing - Unit E112PO - 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Walgreens - Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Karmicheals - Unit 31 - Detail 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 PartsGiant - Unit E112PO - Parts 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Home Depot - Unit 31 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 WeatherTech - Unit 332 - FloorLiner 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Unit - B1 - Handle 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Amazon - Unit 38 - Winch Rope 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.3.a Page: 2 c ca U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 395.0( a� L 29.2( =a 4- 379.2( c m 1,206.1z c c� 0 110.2E L>% 0 a E w 32.7. 0 136.8£ o a Q. 28.8E Q 8.7E ti 658.8( m r A 50.7: N r 14.1E 127.9E 33.0' m 158.0( t R .r r Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 42 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Fisheries - Unit E124PO - Supplies 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Amazon - Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Home Depot - E124PO - Parts 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Amazon - Unit 124PO - Parts 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Amazon - Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 Good to Go - Unit 535 - Toll Fees 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 Amazon - Unit 803 - Dash Mount 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UPS - Fleet - Safety Video Return 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 2985 WWTP: GLOVES/TRAINING/HEATEI Amazon: Gloves 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Training: Batyah Chliek 12/2 Admin A 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 Radiant Under Desk Heater from MOI 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 Norgreen 1-1/4" Regulator from Ward 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 3215 INV#3215 11/07/16 - COMPAAN - ED REBOOK PLANE-IACPC-COMPAAN 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 LODG I NG-IACPC-COMPAAN 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 3249 PASSPORT MAILINGS PASSPORT MAILINGS 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 3314 INV#3314 11/07/16 - LAWLESS - EC 5.3.a Page: 3 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 146.1 a� L 47.9E =a 4- 9.4E c m 44.9E c� 12.9E 0 L 8.2E a E 30.1E 'ca w 9.7 1 0 0 L 2.0£ cL Q 199.0( r ti 128.5 , m r 640.3' r� N 189.0( 682.0£ Page: 3 Packet Pg. 43 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) UNLOCK VEHICLE - #16-26136 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 3355 GLOBAL IND - TRAFFIC - WIRING Global Ind - Traffic - Wiring Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 3520 INV#3520 11/07/16 - POLICE DEP MEAL -TACTICAL TRAINING-POFF 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 POST IT MESSAGE FLAGS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 MEAL -TACTICAL TRAINING-POFF 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 UNIVERSAL SHEET PROTECTORS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 5 PLASTIC BOXES W/BUCKLES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 RAIN GEAR SET - MEHL (SMART 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 DVD/CD SHREDDER PLUS 001.000.41.521.80.35.00 FEDEX CHG SEND TO FULLER 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 FEDEX CHG #16-10112, #24084 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 FEDEX CHG #16-24850,24531,253 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 CR123A BATTTERIES 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 FEDEX CHG #16-25937 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 VARIOUS SIZES TRAINING TARG 5.3.a Page: 4 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a m 150.0( S m L ia 706.8, T aD c m 67.5< c� 10.9E o L 25.4( a E 49.9� 0 TE 247.1-, o a Q. 202.1( Q 18.9< ti 17.5( r 0: M 15.4: N El r 68.4( 15.4: � Page: 4 Packet Pg. 44 5.3.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 11/28/2016 9:30:13AM City of Edmonds ca lid Bank code : usbank U a� Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun }; 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK (Continued) a LAMINATING CARRIERS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 18.3z SUPPLY CADDY - DETECTIVES aci L 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 9.81 =a DESK SUPPLIES - DETECTIVES ;;_ 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 7.3' NITRILE GLOVES (S) 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.81 FEDEX CHG #16-8337 ca 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 18.9< p END TAB FILE POCKET FOLDERS 001.000.41.521.11.31.00 89.3E a 3535 DOMYOWNPEST- RAT BAIT- SEWI DOMYOWNPest - Rat Bait - Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 489.7E u WIN 911Software - Water/Sewer w C 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 247.5( WIN 911Software - Water/Sewer C L 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 247.5( a SQ Electronics - Appliance Recycle Q 421.000.74.537.90.49.00 60.0( Office Depot - Parks Bldg - Supplies ti 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 144.1( 4675 4675 PARKS CR CARD r AW POTTERY: TAX NOT ORIGINALI M 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 169.0E N r SURVEY MONKEY (WOTS SURVEY 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 26.0( AMAZON: MECHANICAL TEST PLU( 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 43.3E AMAZON: ZIP TIES VARIOUS SIZES 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 22.5 1 AMAZON: ANTIMICROBIAL GYM WI 001.000.64.571.28.31.00 123.4 1 t R .r r Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 45 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) QFC: FRUIT 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 SHAWGUIDES WRITERS CONFE 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 AMAZON BOOK: A FRAMEWORK 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 FASHION UNLIMITED: VEST PATC 001.000.64.571.23.41.00 WA TRACTOR: FELT BAG 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 AMAZON: MARKERS FOR GYMN 001.000.64.571.28.31.00 4697 PLATT RETIREMENT POSTER office supply -- drawer organizer 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 shipping 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 computer monitor screen message 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 Mayor/CS Dept. coffee maker 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 wall calendar 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 telephone message books 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 framing of retirement poster for J. 001.000.21.513.10.41.00 iZI 5.3.a Page: 6 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 32.9 1 RE m 500.0( =5 F( }' 4- 25.0: c H 65.8£ c� 191.0< 0 AS 56.3£ a E .5 24.2( 4- 0 7.1( b( 0 L 7.9£ Q Q 45.8' r ti 22.9c m r 27.9( M N r 109.7( N Y 12.9' E .5 001.000.21.513.10.41.00 10.4( U 5593 REDCORDING FEES SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDINC m 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 501.5( t R .r r a Page: 6 Packet Pg. 46 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) SNOHOMISH COUNTY RECORDI 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 6254 6254 CARRIE HITE CC ALASKAAIRLINES- TO ATTEND W 001.000.64.571.21.43.00 GYMNASTICS EQUIPMENT 001.000.64.571.28.35.00 7000 TRAVEL CHARGES TRAVEL CHARGES 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 7476 INV#7476 11/07/16 - BARD - EDM 5.3.a Page: 7 Of� 0 ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a N C -0) 501.5( R 237.2( d c 705.7( c c� 1,076.5E o 0 a 31.7E E N gi U 23.3c o g) > 28.7< 0 gi a 0. 32.5, Q nc 13.0( ti E m r 1,928.1E M N 67.8( N 67.4E E 2 54.8c 0 Page: 7 Packet Pg. 47 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) ACO, #16-47 ad - Craigslist 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 Mini ipad- Wellness incentive (HQ) 001.000.22.518.10.49.00 NACO- ACO ad 001.000.22.518.10.41.40 Wellness incentive 001.000.22.518.10.49.00 Wellness banner 001.000.22.518.10.49.00 8305 ADV TRANSPORT SEMINAR - P WIL Adv Transport Seminar - P Williams 001.000.65.518.20.49.00 8349 INV#8349 11/07/16 - ANDERSON - E FUEL -LEADER CONF-RICHARDSOP 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 LODGING -LEADER CONF-RICHARE 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 FUEL -LEADER CONF-RICHARDSOI' 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 MEAL -LEADERS CONF-RICHARDS( 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 MEAL -LEADER CONF-RICHARDSOI 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 9821 INV#9821 11/7/16 - GREENMUN - EC TRANS LODGING 10/9 TO #2519 - S 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 TRANS LODGING 10/16 TO #2519 - 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 TRANS LODGING 10/23 TO #2519 - 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 9821 INV#9821 11/07/16 - GREENMUN - E ALS/SLS LEVEL III RH HOLSTERS 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 5.3.a Page: 8 c ca U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 90.0( a� L 296.4E =a 4. 40.0( c m 18.0( c� 22.9 1 0 L 0 a 50.0( U w 20.5: 0 c� 249.2£ o a 0. 16.7< Q 44.8z m r A N -75.9( N -75.9( w -75.9( 6 c m 307.9E R .r r Q Page: 8 Packet Pg. 48 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) REG.- INTERVIEW TECH-TRYKAR 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 REG.- ST CRIMES SEMINAR-PLOE( 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 REG.-ST CRIMES SEMINAR-CLARK 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 REG.-ST CRIMES SEMINAR-YAMAN 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 TRAINING OFFICE SUPPLIES 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 MAILING CHG FOR FLASHLIGHT RI 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 PEERLESS HINGED HANDCUFFS 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 GALLS BLACK HANDCUFF KEY 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 GALLS HYBRID HANDCUFF KEY 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 BIANCHI FLASHLIGHT HOLDER 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 BIANCHI BELT KEEPERS 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 21 INCH ASP BATON 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 SILENT KEY HOLDER 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 FLASHLIGHT HOLDER 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 TACTICAL COVERT GLOVES (L) 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 TACTICAL COVERT GLOVES (M) 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 NIKE WRESTLING SHOES (POLANI 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 5.3.a Page: 9 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 380.0( 349.0( =5 4- 349.0( c m 349.0( c� 107.2� 0 L 12.4E a E 151.2( 'S w 22.4( 0 18.6 , o a Q. 16.8( Q 37.7E i 115.2E M 56.6: r 38.3z Y E 40.8E 5 37.3z m 68.9� t R .r r Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 49 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222899 11/23/2016 062693 US BANK 222900 11/23/2016 075836 AAKAVS CONSULTING LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) NIKE MOUTHGUARD (POLAND) 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 NIKE L/S SHIRTS (POLAND) 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 MASE CASES (LEATHER BASKET" 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 20 14F INERT TRAINING CANISTEF 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 HANGING HOOKS 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 3 SWIVEL RADIO HOLDERS 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 ENGRAVING NEW HANDCUFFS 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 MAILING CHG FOR FLASHLIGHT RI 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 Total: EDMONDS/CITY/002 AKTIVOV - ASSET MGMT SOFTWAF Aktivov - Asset Mgmt Software 111.000.68.542.31.49.00 Aktivov - Asset Mgmt Software 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 Aktivov - Asset Mgmt Software 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 Aktivov - Asset Mgmt Software 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.49.00 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 9.8% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 9.8% Sales Tax 5.3.a Page: 10 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 13.1z a� L 70.0E 125.9� m 192.3E c� 30.7, 0 L 208.9E a E 23.2E 'ca w 12.4E 0 21,476.4E 0 L a Q. Q 6,278.5( ti 6,278.5( m 6,278.5( M N 6,278.5( N 615.2� E 615.2� r 615.2E a0i E t R .r r Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 50 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222900 11/23/2016 075836 AAKAVS CONSULTING LLC (Continued) 222901 11/23/2016 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 375949 376013 222902 11/23/2016 072189 ACCESS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 1548211 222903 11/23/2016 063863 ADVANCED TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 0000016773 222904 11/23/2016 060205 ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP 14804471-00 PO # Description/Account 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 Tota AARD PEST CONTROL MEADOW AARD PEST CONTROL MEADOW 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 AARD PEST CONTROL PM & SR. AARD PEST CONTROL PM & SR. 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 Tota STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 8/18/ STORAGE OF DOCUMENTS 8/1/2 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 Tota STREET PROJECT - RED ARROW Street Project - Red Arrow Lens 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Yellow Arrow Lens 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Green Arrow Lens 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Tota CITY HALL RESTROOM PROJECT City Hall Restroom Project - Supplie 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 5.3.a Page: 11 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; _ 0 615.3( 0- a) 1 : 27,575.1 i v a� D� 75.0( 4 c m 7.3E Cf � 125.0( ca a 12.2E 1 : 219.6( 2( c )1 85.0( o 1 : 85.0( a Q. L Q r 115.8( 124.3( r� N 118.6( r N 35.1( 1 : 393.8E E s 103.2( t R .r r a Page: 11 Packet Pg. 51 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222904 11/23/2016 060205 ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP (Continued) 222905 11/23/2016 073573 ANIXTER 222906 11/23/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES PO # Description/Account 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 23K-133736 FAC MAINT - KEY SUPPLY Fac Maint - Key Supply 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.3.a Page: 12 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 0- 10.11 m Total : 113.3; 41 Tota 1988879743 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1988883747 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MA PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MA 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MA 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax a� L 4 170.0( m 16.2E c c� 18.2( o 204.51 c� a E 24.9( TU w 0 2.4z @ T: T: � � � � T� > a 1.6' Q . . 6.1' r 6.1' r 6.1' N r 6.1' w � 6.0E E 0.1( r c m 0.6( E t R .r r Q Page: 12 Packet Pg. 52 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222906 11/23/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1988883748 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1988890452 WWTP: 11/16/16 UNIFORMS, TOWE wwtp uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 wwtp mats & towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 1988890453 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 1988894481 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 5.3.a Page: 13 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 0.6( -0) 0.6( aUi L =a 0.6( a� c 0.5� c c� 5.6E o L 18.4( a E 1.8( 0 0.5( m r 11.30 M N r 49.7( Y 4.81 •E r 1.6' a0i E t R .r r Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 53 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222906 11/23/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 222907 11/23/2016 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1988894482 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 Total: 0998036-IN WWTP: 11/10/16 FUEL FOR TANK ULSD #2 DYED - BULK fuel (include 5.3.a Page: 14 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 6.1' -) 6.1' aa) L =a 6.1' 4- w c 6.1' Mw 6.0£ m 0 0.1( L>% 0 a 0.6( 0.6( U 0 0.6( 0 L 0.6( a Q 0.5( r ti 5.9E m r A 0.5£ N r 1.8' 18.4( •9 338.6( 6 Page: 14 Packet Pg. 54 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222907 11/23/2016 071124 ASSOCIATED PETROLEUM 222908 11/23/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.32.00 Tota 91080 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILL UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area #500 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area #500 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 9.6% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 9.6% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 9.6% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 91199 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILL UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area #600 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 UB Outsourcing area #600 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 9.6% Sales Tax 5.3.a Page: 15 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 2,339.6, -0) 229.2£ L 1 : 2,568.9( S a c m 37.3£ -0 c M 37.3� o 38.5' a 134.6, 134.6' o 3.5� o L a Q. 3.5� Q m 34.0( M N 34.0( N Y 35.0, E 126.2, r 126.2, E t R .r r Q Page: 15 Packet Pg. 55 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222908 11/23/2016 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 222909 11/23/2016 002100 BARNARD, EARL 222910 11/23/2016 075217 BASLER, TONY 222911 11/23/2016 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 222912 11/23/2016 067391 BRAT WEAR Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 9.6% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 9.6% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 68 LEOFF 1 REIMBURSEMENT LEOFF 1 reimbursement 617.000.51.517.20.23.00 LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 617.000.51.517.20.23.00 5.3.a Page: 16 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 3.2( -0a 3.2( aUi L =a 3.3 - 0 }' Total: 758.7E c Tota 15197 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 Tota 12525 E5GA/E5JA/E4GB.SERVICES THR ESGA.Services thru October 2016 423.200.75.594.35.41.00 ESJA.Services thru October 2016 421.200.74.594.34.41.00 E4GB.Services thru October 2016 423.200.75.594.35.41.00 Tota 20284 INV#20284 - EDMONDS PD - POL DUTY BELT, BASKETWEAVE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 INNER LINER BELT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 METAL NAME TAG 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 m c c� 30.0( o 100.0( a 1 : 130.0( U w 0 107.5 @ 1 : 107.51 0 U Q. i c A� 17,162.4( T ti 1,386.2E " m r 5,450.1( N 1 : 23,998.8' r Y 59.0( Page: 16 Packet Pg. 56 5.3.a vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 11/28/2016 9:30:13AM City of Edmonds ca lid Bank code : usbank U a� Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun }; 222912 11/23/2016 067391 BRAT WEAR (Continued) a 9.8% Sales Tax m 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 9.7E 20313 INV#20313 - EDMONDS PD - STREE L VELCRO SOFT BADGES FOR VEST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 12.0( 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 1.1E 20314 INV#20314 - EDMONDS PD - SERVI, 1,000 SERVICE BARS 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 700.0( o 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 68.6( a 20325 INV#20325 - EDMONDS PD - STRUT DUTY BELT, BASKETWEAVE 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 59.0( 9.8% Sales Tax o 001.000.41.521.71.24.00 5.7E > Total: 955.8' o a 222913 11/23/2016 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 5172 HATHA YOGA 5172 HATHA YOGA - GENTLE Q' Q 5172 HATHA YOGA - GENTLE 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 298.0E 5178 HATHA YOGA 5178 HATHA YOGA 5178 HATHA YOGA m 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 614.2E r 5181 HATHA YOGA 5181 HATHA YOGA N 5181 HATHA YOGA 00 1.000.64.571.27.4 1.00 497.2: w 5187 HATHA YOGA 5187 HATHA YOGA cYi 5187 HATHA YOGA E 00 1.000.64.571.27.4 1.00 380.2E f° Total: 11789.& c 222914 11/23/2016 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE 1052489 E6MA.PUBLISH BID DOCS ONLINE E E6MA.Publish Bid Docs Online R .r r Q Page: 17 Packet Pg. 57 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222914 11/23/2016 072571 BUILDERS EXCHANGE 222915 11/23/2016 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 222916 11/23/2016 075855 BUSINESS XPANSION JOURNAL 222917 11/23/2016 061966 CAMP FIRE BOYS & GIRLS 222918 11/23/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 318462 24081 DE PO # Description/Account 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 Tota PW YARD - SAND/ROCK PW Yard - Sand / Rock 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 PW Yard - Sand / Rock 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 PW Yard - Sand / Rock 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 PW Yard - Sand / Rock 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Total ; BUSINESS MARKETING EVENTAD` Business marketing event advertisem 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 Total 5042 BABYSITTING 5042 BABYSITTING BASICS 5042 BABYSITTING BASICS 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Tota 16709141 INV#16709141 - EDMONDS PD COPY RENTAL #6255 FOR 11/201 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 5.3.a Page: 18 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 77.5: 77.5E +. a� L 1,459.2( c m 1,459.2( c c� 1,459.2( o 1,459.2( a 143.0' U 143.0' o 143.0' o L a Q. 143.0( Q 6,409.0 , r ti 6 w 2,400.0( r 2,400.0( N N 150.0( E I : 150.0( 'm c m 151.80 t R .r r Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 58 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222918 11/23/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) COPY RENTAL #3325 FOR 11/201 5.3.a Page: 19 6 6 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a -0) 60.7( m 160.0( =5 4 36.5' c m 68.5: c�a 0 38.8: ca a 38.8: .5 27.4. U w 0 27.4, 0 L 27.4' a Q 6.7, r ti 3.8' m r 3.8' r� N 2.6� N 2.6� E .5 2.61 r c m 70.6E t U R .r r Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 59 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222918 11/23/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Water Sewer Copier 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 16709146 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091/0521 Finance dept copier contract charge 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 16709149 COPIER CONTRACT CHARGES C5: Copier contract charges C5250 11/16 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 Copier contract charges C5250 11/16 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 Copier contract charges C5250 11/16 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 16709151 CANON CONTRACT CHARGES NOS November 2016 contract charges for 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 16709152 CONTRACT CHARGE CONTRACT CHARGE 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 16709153 CONTRACT CHARGE CONTRACT CHARGE 5.3.a Page: 20 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 70.6E a� L 6.9z =a 6.9, m 209.6' c�a 0 20.51 0 a E 167.6E '� w 20.9( 0 20.9E o a Q. 16.4< Q 2.0: ti 2.0( r A N r 26.4z N 2.6( Page: 20 Packet Pg. 60 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222918 11/23/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 16709156 16709157 16712482 16712483 222919 11/23/2016 075023 CAROLYN DOUGLAS COMMUNICATION 60 222920 11/23/2016 067446 CEM CORPORATION 222921 11/23/2016 068484 CEMEX LLC 548051 PO # Description/Account 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 FLEET COPIER Fleet Copier 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 RECEPTIONIST DESK CITY CLER RECEPTIONIST DESK COPIER LE 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 ENG COPIER LEASE.NOVEMBER Eng. Copier Lease. November 2016 001.000.67.518.21.45.00 CONTRACT CHARGE CONTRACT CHARG 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 5.3.a Page: 21 c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 0 a 35.5' -0a U a� L 32.3� 4 3.11 c K: A 13.3, 0 1.3' j, 2 0 a E 307.1' 4- 0 344.0( Total: 2,076.8, o a COMMUNICATIONS/COMMUNITY O Q- Q Communications and community outr 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 2,500.0( r Total : 2,500.0( WWTP: DRYING PADS 10CM SQ t° r DRYING PADS 10CM SQ A N 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 805.2( r 9.8% Sales Tax w 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 78.9' 9434414257 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax Tota 884.1' E ca c 302.1( t R .r r a Page: 21 Packet Pg. 61 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222921 11/23/2016 068484 CEMEX LLC 222922 11/23/2016 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 9434424013 9434456486 RN10161028 222923 11/23/2016 003710 CHEVRON AND TEXACO BUSINESS 48976359 222924 11/23/2016 063902 CITY OF EVERETT 116002943 222925 11/23/2016 075856 CITY OF KIRKLAND POLICE DEPT NOV 2016 PO # Description/Account 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 ROADWAY - LIQUID ASPHALT Roadway - Liquid Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 ROADWAY - ASPHALT Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 PM: CYLINDER RENTAL PM: CYLINDER RENTAL 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 Tota Tota INV#48976359 ACCT#7898305185 FUEL FOR NARCS VEHICLE-POF 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 CAR WASH FOR NARCS VEHICL 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 TAX EXEMPT FILING FEE 104.000.41.521.21.32.00 Tota WATER QUALITY LAB ANALYSIS Water Quality Lab Analysis 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 Tota INV FOR TRAINING EXPENSES IN 5.3.a Page: 22 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 28.7( -0a U a� L 232.1( 22.0E c m 248.5( F E 0 23.6' 1 : 857.0E a E U 23.0( 0 2.2E 0 1 : 25.2E a Q. Q � r 161.3, ., m 12.0( r M N 1.7< r I : 175.0E w U E 1,020.6( I: 1,020.6( m F E R .r r Q Page: 22 Packet Pg. 62 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222925 11/23/2016 075856 CITY OF KIRKLAND POLICE DEPT (Continued) 222926 11/23/2016 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 12565 222927 11/23/2016 075858 CLYBORNE, PIPER BID-112116 222928 11/23/2016 075269 COBURN, LINDA Nov 2016 222929 11/23/2016 072848 COPIERS NW 1472754 PO # Description/Account REGISTRATION 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 LODGING IN UTAH 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 EXPEDIA- DELTAAIRLINES 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 BUDGET RENTAL -SALT LAKE CIT 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 PER DIEM 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 Tota TRAFFIC CONTROL - SIGNAL INS' Traffic Control - Signal Install 111.000.68.542.64.51.00 Tota REIMBURSEMENT FOR COPIES Reimbursement for photocopies an 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 Tota REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO PRESI REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO PRESIE 001.000.23.512.50.43.00 Tota INV#1472754 ACCT#HMH636 - ED 1,913 B/W COPIES 11/5 TO 11/10/1 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 1,577 COLOR COPIES 11/5 TO 11P 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 5.3.a Page: 23 c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 0 a am 2,280.0( 4) 1,346.1' =5 4- 390.2( c 1,364.3t c� 522.0( 0 I: 5,902.7( L a V 0 to 402.7z Z 1 : 402.71 o d DII M AN > 0 a l 15.71 Q 1 : 15.71 r 180.3( 1 : 180.3E N M 6 15.3( ca 74.1, c 8.7( t R .r r Q Page: 23 Packet Pg. 63 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 222929 11/23/2016 072848 072848 COPIERS NW (Continued) 222930 11/23/2016 063519 CUZ CONCRETE PRODUCTS INC 239416 222931 11/23/2016 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 222932 11/23/2016 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 222933 11/23/2016 073757 DEX MEDIA WEST INC 222934 11/23/2016 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 222935 11/23/2016 075130 DOHERTY, PATRICK 5.3.a Page: 24 c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 1 : 98.11 0 CL m 1,679.6£ 164.6' c Total : 1,844.2t 3319281 E6GC.RFQ ADVERTISEMENT c E6GC.RFQ Advertisement f° 423.200.75.594.35.41.00 417.3( o Total: 417.3( ca a Description/Account STORM - CATCH BASINS Storm - Catch Basins 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 Tota WWOPCERTRENWL11 WWTP: 2017 OPERATOR CERT REI E 2017 WW Operator Certification Reny 2 423.000.76.535.80.49.71 330.0( ,- Total: 330.0( c 651150804 CEMETERY ADVERTISING CEMETERY ADVERTISING 130.000.64.536.20.41.40 Tota 16-3710 ESDB,MEETING MINUTES 7/14/16- E5DB.Meeting Minutes 7/14/16-9/2 c� 0 L Q Q. 2,969.0( Q 2,969.0( r ti a 2/' � 353.1( M V N A 471.9( Y 1 : 825.0( E CC g r 388.2, E 22.0( R .r r Q Page: 24 Packet Pg. 64 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222935 11/23/2016 075130 DOHERTY, PATRICK 222936 11/23/2016 007253 DUNN LUMBER 222937 11/23/2016 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 222938 11/23/2016 008410 EDMONDS PRINTING CO 222939 11/23/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.3.a Page: 25 c ca lid U a� Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun j (Continued) a Mileage January - November 17, 201, -0) 001.000.61.557.20.43.00 800.8 1 Total: 1,211.05 w 4378398 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Tota 1-67499 PM: SUPPLIES PM: SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Tota R25364 RECYCLE - TREE DOOR HANGE RS L 4- a� c 100.9< 9.5£ I : 110.5: o L a 69.1 £ . U 6.7£ c I : 75.9E a Q. 910.0( Q r 89.1 E I : 999.1E " m r R M N r 424.7( w U 966.10 378.3( t U R .r r Q Page: 25 Packet Pg. 65 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222939 11/23/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) ANWAY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-01127 WWTP:9/15-11/14/16 2002ND AVE 9/15-11/14/16 200 2ND AVE S / MET 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 6-01130 WWTP:9/15-11/14/16 2002ND AVE 9/15-11/14/16 200 2ND AVE S / MET 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 6-01140 WWTP: 9/15-11/14/16 200 2ND AVE 9/15-11/14/16 200 2ND AVE S / MET 423.000.76.535.80.47.64 6-01250 CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER CITY PARK BALLFIELD SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-01275 CITY PARK PARKING LOT CITY PARK PARKING LOT 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-01280 CITY PARK SPRAY PARK CITY PARK SPRAY PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-02125 PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKL PINE STREET PLAYFIELD SPRINKL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-02727 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-02730 CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE I CIVIC CENTER PLAYFIELD SKATE I 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-02735 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX 250 5TF 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 6-02736 FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH A\,j FIRE STATION #17 FIRE 275 6TH A\v 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 5.3.a Page: 26 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 912.7' 186.9' E. aD c m 25.6< c� 0 1,323.9E j, c� a E 786.7' '@ 0 L a 0. 474.0E Q ti 463.4( m r A 307.2z N r N Y 246.9' E 1,796.1E c m E 14.6: R .r r Q Page: 26 Packet Pg. 66 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222939 11/23/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 6-02737 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 6-02738 PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX IRRIGA 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 6-02825 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 6-02875 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIF 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 6-02885 DOWNTOWN RESTROOM DOWNTOWN RESTROOM 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-02900 FAC SPRINKLER FAC SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-02925 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 6-03000 CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRI CIVIC CENTER PARKING LOT SPRI 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-03275 HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKI HUMMINGBIRD HILL PARK SPRINKI 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-03575 MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER MAPLEWOOD PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 6-04127 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 6-04128 FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TI- FIRE STATION #16 FIRE 8429 196TI- 5.3.a Page: 27 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 995.9 1 m L 474.0E c m 4,458.2( 0 25.6: a E 171.91 4- 0 c� 999.3, o L a Q. Q 1,763.2E ti 429.1 £ r A N 257.8� N Y 267.1' ,E ca Page: 27 Packet Pg. 67 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222939 11/23/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 6-04400 6-04425 6-04450 6-05155 6-05156 PO # Description/Account 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER SEAVIEW PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER SIERRA PARK SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 5.3.a Page: 28 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 14.6E U a� L 708.3( 4. aD c 461.2( c c� 330.8' o c lC a 145.4E E 552.7E w 0 552.7E @ 0 552.7E a Q 552.7E ` r ti 552.7z 21 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 21 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 5.3.a Page: 28 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 14.6E U a� L 708.3( 4. aD c 461.2( c c� 330.8' o c lC a 145.4E E 552.7E w 0 552.7E @ 0 552.7E a Q 552.7E ` r ti 552.7z m 21 M 1.8: N 21 6.9E Y � 6.9E . � 6.9E m 6.9E E R .r r Q Page: 28 Packet Pg. 68 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222939 11/23/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 6-06040 6-07775 6-08500 6-08525 222940 11/23/2016 075566 EHRBAR, PAMELA BID-112116 222941 11/23/2016 067945 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 16-054048-RDU-T5 222942 11/23/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH674762 222943 11/23/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH729361 EDH730453 PO # Description/Account PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE 7110 BID ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES INV#16-054048-RDU-T5 - EDMON REPORT - SALIH #2016-25878 001.000.41.521.11.41.00 Tota LEGAL DESCRIPTION- BRACKET legal description Bracketts Corner 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 Tota E6MA.INVITATION TO BID AD E6MA.Invitation to Bid Ad 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 E6GC.RFQ ADVERTISEMENT 5.3.a Page: 29 21 0 j 1,208.1( , 0 a E 921.6( '@ 11 r 323.3( a0i E t R .r r Q Page: 29 Packet Pg. 69 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222943 11/23/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 222944 11/23/2016 071562 FORMA 222945 11/23/2016 011900 FRONTIER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) E6GC.RFQ Advertisement 423.200.75.594.35.41.00 EDH730870 CITY NOTICES CIVIC FIELD MASTE CITY NOTICES - CIVIC FIELD MAST 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 Total: DSP-01-11.09-16 FORMA DESIGN DAYTON ST. DRAWINGS AND PRELIMINARY ME 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 Total 253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE' 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE' 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 425-712-8251 PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX, PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 5.3.a Page: 30 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 182.3, 34.4( V 540.Of m c c� 2,365.0( o 231.71 a 2,596.7i E U 4- 0 6.3( 0 24.2( a Q. Q 24.2c r 24.Z m 24.Z r M N 24.3( r N Y 33.3, E 33.3' U r c am E 16.2 1 R .r r Q Page: 30 Packet Pg. 70 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 222945 11/23/2016 011900 FRONTIER (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND IN' 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 425-745-4313 CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSIOI` 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5 CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSIC 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 425-775-7865 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI' 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 425-776-2742 LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACC 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER ALA FRANCESANDERSON CENTER FIF 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 Total: 222946 11/23/2016 075163 GARCIA-GARCIA, CESAR 6z0434304 INTERPRTER FEE INTERPRTER FEE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 Total: 222947 11/23/2016 075859 GERALYN REINART, PE BID-020-16 BID - DOWNTOWN EDMONDS PARI Downtown Edmonds parking assessn 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 Total: 5.3.a Page: 31 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 81.3< a� L 68.3. =a µ.. 68.3. c m 91.0� c ca 66.4E 0 a Q. 26.Z Q ti 131.3( 938.3: w r M N 105.5, Y 105.5, E 1,000.0( c 1,000.0( E t R .r r Q Page: 31 Packet Pg. 71 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 222948 11/23/2016 012199 GRAINGER 9246062922 FAC - PRESSURE REGULATOR FAC - Pressure Regulator 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Tota 222949 11/23/2016 074722 GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS 691891 OLD PW SECURITY Old PW Security 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Tota 222950 11/23/2016 012560 HACH COMPANY 10192464 WATER QUALITY - TESTING KITS Water Quality - Testing Kits (16) 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Tota 222951 11/23/2016 075483 HARDESTY, STEPHANIE 10/31-11/2 PRE SUB 10/31/16 - 11/2/16 PRESCHOOL S 10/31/16 - 11/2/16 PRESCHOOL S 001.000.64.571.29.41.00 11/03/16 PRE SUB 11/03/16 PRESCHOOL SUB 11/03/16 PRESCHOOL SUB 001.000.64.571.29.41.00 Tota 222952 11/23/2016 074804 HARLES, JANINE 197346 PHOTOGRAPHY FOR NOVEMBER Photography for November 2016 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 Tota 222953 11/23/2016 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 14368523 WATER INVENTORY - W-SETTER Water Inventory - W-SETTERCK-01 5.3.a Page: 32 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 37.6( a� L 3.6� =a 1 : 41.3E aD c m 55.0( cm I : 55.0( o 0 ( Q 835.0z .E U 52.7 c 87.0' c I : 974.8: a 0M UE Q UE r 126.0( 200.0( •76 200.0( U r CI � -( E t R .r r Q Page: 32 Packet Pg. 72 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222953 11/23/2016 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 222954 11/23/2016 013140 HENDERSON, BRIAN 222955 11/23/2016 074966 HIATT, ELLEN 222957 11/23/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 Water Parts 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 W-PIPECO-01-011 #0334 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 14385024 WATER INVENTORY - #435 W-SE Water Inventory - #435 W-SETTER 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 9.8% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Tota 69 LEOFF 1 REIMBURSEMENT LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 5.3.a Page: 33 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 1,023.4E -0a 3,159.4, i =a 1,706.4( V aD c 267.5: 309.6, c�a Tl o CI 1,023.4E a E 187.1E 'M U w 100.3( 0 c� 18.3z o 7,795.7! Q Q ti 187.5E Total : 187.5� m r COE 2016 111 TOURISM COMMUNICATIONS AND A N Tourism communications and marketi r 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 1,500.0( w 1020191 FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Tota I: 1,500.0( cYi E 228.9 0 m E 10.9z R .r r Q Page: 33 Packet Pg. 73 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 222957 11/23/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1060844 WATER - SUPPLIES Water - Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 11614 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12405 FAC - BATHROOM PARTS FAC - Bathroom Parts 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1585249 SEWER - SUPPLIES Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1831468 SEWER - TOOL BOX (DELIVERED Sewer - Tool Box (delivered to City) 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2010013 SEWER - RECYCLE BIN Sewer - Recycle Bin 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2013411 FAC MAINT SUPPLIES - WRONG Fac Maint Supplies - Wrong ones r re 5.3.a Page: 34 c ca U a� Amoun }; 0 a m 22.7� a� L 55.2 d c 5.2E c c� 74.5( o L 7.0E a E 51.1E 0 4.8E > 0 L Q 0. 4.9E Q m r 338.31 M N 33.1( N 32.9( .E c� 3.1< )I m E U R .r r Q Page: 34 Packet Pg. 74 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 222957 11/23/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2020047 FAC - FAUCET FAC - Faucet 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2020074 FAC - FAUCET, SUPPLIES FAC - Faucet, Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2021507 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 20330 FAC - SUPPLIES FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2034596 FAC MAINT RETURNS Fac Maint Returns 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 20433 FAC MAINT - TRUCK 5 / SHOP SU Fac Maint - Truck 5 / Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2571692 FAC MAINT TRUCK SUPPLIES 5.3.a Page: 35 c ca lid U W Amoun }; 0 a 21.1( -0) 2.0( 4) L 58.0( c m 5.5' c� 0 112.0E j, ca a 10.6z U 9.8( o 2.5( m r A -21.1( N r -2.0( Y PI E 119.9z a r 11.3£ a0i E t R .r r Q Page: 35 Packet Pg. 75 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222957 11/23/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Fac Maint Truck Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 30137 PARKS BLDG - FAUCET Parks Bldg - Faucet 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3021267 FAC MAINT TRUCK 42 - SUPPLIES Fac Maint Truck 42 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3021296 FAC - DRINKING FOUNTAIN PART FAC - Drinking Fountain Parts 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3034577 CITY HALL - FAUCET City Hall - Faucet 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4011075 PS - SUPPLIES PS - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4011158 PS - PATCH SUPPLIES PS - Patch Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.3.a Page: 36 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 87.9 1 a� L 8.3E =a 4- W c 69.0( Mw 6.5( m 92.5 1 > 0 8.7( a Q 188.0( ti 17.8( w r A N 91.8( N 8.7, E 64.8' m 6.1( E R .r r a Page: 36 Packet Pg. 76 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222957 11/23/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 5010833 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5010848 PW - VEHICLES SUPPLIES PW - Vehicles Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 5010904 FAC MAINT TRUCK 95 - SUPPLIE 5.3.a Page: 37 S c ca U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 83.7� aUi L =a 7.9( W c m 29.8, c� 2.8, o 0 a 7.9z E 0.7E u E o 229.0( m r 21.7( M N 8.7E Y 0.81 . ca r 77.8' a0i E t R .r r Q Page: 37 Packet Pg. 77 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222957 11/23/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 6201651 7010500 7025953 8011871 8020685 8020703 8022031 PO # Description/Account 111.000.68.542.61.31.00 STREET - UNIT 66 - SUPPLIES Street - Unit 66 - Supplies 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.31.00 FAC - SUPPLIES FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 YOST - SUPPLIES Yost - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT SHOP SUPPLIES Fac Maint Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 PW - HOSE NOZEL PW - Hose Nozel 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 CITY HALL - SUPPLIES City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.3.a Page: 38 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 7.3( -00 U 14.3 1.3 c m 27.9 1 M 0 2.6( 0 a E 30.4. 2.8� o 120.8( w r A 11.40 N r N 9.9( E 0.9E Page: 38 Packet Pg. 78 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 222957 11/23/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8022033 FAC MAINT - TRUCK 42 - SUPPLIE Fac Maint - Truck 42 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8022065 FAC - ROOF PATCH SUPPLIES FAC - Roof Patch Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8022121 FAC - SUPPLIES FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8034511 STORM - SUPPLIES Storm - Supplies 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 9011702 PARKS MAINT SHOP - SUPPLIES Parks Maint Shop - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9020492 FAC - WATER SUPPLY LINE FAC - Water Supply Line 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9062605 SEWER - SUPPLIES Sewer - Supplies 5.3.a Page: 39 c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 0 a am 1.4E 8 a� L 16.8E E. aD c 1.6( Mw c c� 207.8( o L 19.7E a E 8.7( 4- 0 0.8: 0 L Q 0. 1.8< Q 0.1 ti 13.4E .9 1.2E r Page: 39 Packet Pg. 79 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 222957 11/23/2016 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Tota 222958 11/23/2016 071634 INTEGRATELECOM 14267274 C/A768328 PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929 5.3.a Page: 40 , 3,797.3z T 1 : 3,797.31 m r M 193.4. N r 1 : 193.4; N Y R � E 950.0( 1 : 950.0( c m E t R .r r Q Page: 40 Packet Pg. 80 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222963 11/23/2016 067568 KPG INC (Continued) 108316 222964 11/23/2016 069343 KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES INC 1608041-1283 222965 11/23/2016 075159 LIFE INSURANCE CO OF NO AMER Dec 2016 Cigna 222966 11/23/2016 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO 015631 00 222967 11/23/2016 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 70 222968 11/23/2016 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 87855005 87887857 PO # Description/Account 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 ESDA.SERVICES THRU 10/25/16 ESDA.Services thru 10/25/16 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 5.3.a Page: 41 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 2,650.0' a� L 6,271.3: 'a Total : 8,921.3� w TO 16-04.SERVICES THRU OCTOB( a0i TO 16-04.Services thru October 2016 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 3,527.0( Total: 39527.0( o 0 DECEMBER 2016 CIGNA INSURAN( >' 0 December 2016 Cigna Insurance Pre 0' 811.000.231.550 11,588.8 1 , Total: 11,588.81, PM: SUPPLIES 4- 0 PM: SUPPLIES f° 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 202.7E 9.8% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.8 , Q Total : 222.6'. r ti ASSISTED LIVING CARE SERVICE Assisted Living Care Services - LEOF 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 r 8,337.5( M Total : 8,337.5( N r WWTP: PIPE/V-BELT Y PIPE/V-BELT 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 60.9( . Freight f° 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 8.1: WWTP: O-RINGS/PULL HANDLES/C 0 m O-RINGS/PULL HANDLES/CONNEC E 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 t 1,156.1( .r r Q Page: 41 Packet Pg. 81 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222968 11/23/2016 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.3.a Page: 42 c ca lid U a� Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun j (Continued) 0 CL Freight -0) 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 27.9 1 87891076 WWTP: EXPANSION JOINT/LATHE I P L 222969 11/23/2016 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC 248769 222970 11/23/2016 066006 MORGAN SOUND 222971 11/23/2016 075520 NOBLE, LINDA 248783 MS1188385 MS188384 15193 EXPANSION JOINT/LATHE DRIVER 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 244.4: Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 24.2£ Tota PM: SUPPLIES PM: SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PM: SUPPLIES PM: SUPPLIES (BLOWER TUBE) 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Tota PLAZA ROOM - MIC RENTAL Plaza Room - Mic Rental 001.000.66.518.30.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.45.00 PLAZA RM - MIC REPAIRS Plaza Rm - Mic Repairs 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 INTERPERTER FEE INTERPERTER FEE Tota 1,521.8 c c� 0 26.7( a 2.6, •@ t^. 13.8: @ 150.0( r 14.7( Cl) N 155.0( E 15.1t ca 1 : 334.8� r c m E t R .r r Q Page: 42 Packet Pg. 82 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222971 11/23/2016 075520 NOBLE, LINDA (Continued) 222972 11/23/2016 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S7321572.001 S7361350.001 222973 11/23/2016 075542 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 1289 1290 222974 11/23/2016 074866 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIPMEN 40033 PO # Description/Account 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 5.3.a Page: 43 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 106.6E Total : 106.6E +. m WWTP: CAPACITOR BANK-NEMAS CAPACITOR BANK-NEMA SIZE90+4 423.000.76.594.35.64.00 4" 20,795.0( c 9.8% Sales Tax m 423.000.76.594.35.64.00 2,037.9' WWTP: CAPACITOR BANK-NEMA61 ca CAPACITOR BANK POWER SURVE' — 423.000.76.594.35.64.00 14,385.0( 9.8% Sales Tax a 423.000.76.594.35.64.00 11409.7: Total : 38,627.61 PM: SUPPLIES PM: SUPPLIES (7/8 WR) c 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 114.0( c 9.8% Sales Tax a 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 11.11 Q PM: SUPPLIES PM: SUPPLIES (7/8 WR) r 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 114.0( ti 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 w 11.1 i r Total : 250.31 N PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT (INCLU N 125.000.64.594.75.65.00 27,234.3E E FREIGHT 125.000.64.594.75.65.00 3,545.0( 9.8% Sales Tax 125.000.64.594.75.65.00 3,016.3E Page: 43 Packet Pg. 83 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 222974 11/23/2016 074866 074866 NORTHWEST PLAYGROUND EQUIP (Continued) 222975 11/23/2016 073213 NORTHWEST TRAVEL &LIFE 2016-221 222976 11/23/2016 025690 NOYES, KARIN 222977 11/23/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 000 00 695 000 00 697 320614 358095 428809 Description/Account Tota TOURISM DIGITAL ADVERTISING Tourism digital ad campaign for mo 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 Tota PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 11/9 PLANNING BOARD MINUTES-11/9 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 HPC MINUTES 11/10/16 HPC MINUTES-11/10/16 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Tota INV#320614 ACCT#520437 250PO 2017 CALENDARS 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 2017 CALENDAR 001.000.41.521.71.31.00 2017 CALENDAR 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.71.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 INV@428809 ACCT#520437 250P 5.3.a Page: 44 Ol r Q Page: 44 Packet Pg. 84 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222977 11/23/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC (Continued) 431158 447360 222978 11/23/2016 075494 OREGON MILITARY DEPT ARB 00967C 222979 11/23/2016 072539 OTAK INC-WASHINGTON 101600242 91600244 222980 11/23/2016 065051 PARAMETRIX INC 21-24469 PO # Description/Account 2017 CALENDAR-MANDEVILLE 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 2017 MO PLANNER-COMPAAN 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 STREET - PLASTIC SHEET PROT Street - Plastic Sheet protectors for 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE PAPER SUPPLIES 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 Tota INV#ARB 00967 C - EDMONDS PD BALANCE DUE FOR HOUSING S 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 Tota E61DA.SERVICES THRU 10/7/16 E6DA.Services thru 10/7/16 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 E61DA.SERVICES THRU 9/9/16 E6DA.Services thru 9/9/16 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Tota WWTP: 10/2-10/29/16 PLC/SCADA 10/2-10/29/16 PLC/SCADA SYSTE 5.3.a Page: 45 c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 0 a am 10.4( a� L 7.3E =a 4 2.7 1 c m EC 1.01 ca 0 136.7( c� a 13.4( U 45 103.2E 0 W ti 296.0( 1 : 296.0( r M N 4,811.81 w E 4,419.3E 12 1 : 9,231.2E r c c d E M t R .r r Q Page: 45 Packet Pg. 85 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 222980 11/23/2016 065051 PARAMETRIX INC (Continued) 222981 11/23/2016 008475 PETTY CASH Oct 16 222982 11/23/2016 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC K721142 K742457 222983 11/23/2016 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870 PO # Description/Account 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 Tota PW BUILDING SUPPLIES PW Building Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 Fac Maint - Mileage - Keener 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 Fac Maint -Mileage - Brinkley 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Fac Maint - Mileage - Brinkley 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 Fac Maint - Mileage - Keener 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 Street - CDL Endorsement - B Sand 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 Street - CDL Endorsement - D Brow 111.000.68.542.90.49.00 Tota W WTP: APP ADR6034 60A RECPT APP ADR6034 60A RECPT 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 WWTP: THHN 150MCM-STR-CU 5 THHN 150MCM-STR-CU 500' 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Tota PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FO 5.3.a Page: 46 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 43,028.0E a) 43,028.01 m L 4 20.0( c m 2.8 1 c ca 12.31 o 1.9E a 24.3( 8.30 0 e 102.0( o L ni a Q. 102.0( Q I : 273.9: r ti m 329.8z r M N R r a Page: 46 Packet Pg. 86 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222983 11/23/2016 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 222984 11/23/2016 064088 PROTECTION ONE 222985 11/23/2016 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 222986 11/23/2016 070955 R&R STAR TOWING Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 291104 15-3455 117047 222987 11/23/2016 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 0000050167 222988 11/23/2016 075851 SCHULTZ, DOUGLAS REF CLP 222989 11/23/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0254-7 PO # Description/Account PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FO 422.000.72.531.90.51.00 Tota ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MA ALARM MONITORING FOR PARK 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 ALARM MONITORING FOR PARK 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 Tota COURT SECUIRTY COURT SECUIRTY 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 Tota INV#117047 - EDMONDS PD TOW 2011 HONDA CRZ #DV06567 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Tota STORM DUMP FEES Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 Tota REFUND CLP FEE - SCHULTZ REFUND CLP FEE CHARGED IN 001.000.322.90.000.00 REFUND CLP FEE CHARGED IN 001.000.237.190 Tota PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 9 5.3.a Page: 47 lf L 0 a 3,726.2E . I: 3,726.2E w 0 n: 159.0( a Q. 15.5E Q 174.51 r ti EF EF m r 1,576.8( A I: 1,576.8( T N Y � 14.0( . � 18.0( r 1 : 32.0( E 5- R .r r a Page: 47 Packet Pg. 87 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222989 11/23/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95- 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 2002-6027-1 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 2003-9895-6 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2004-9683-4 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 2006-1131-7 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE V 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 2007-2302-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 2007-3984-5 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 2014-3123-6 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 2014-3124-4 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC. PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 2014-4175-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 2015-5174-4 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2017-5147-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 5.3.a Page: 48 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 16.2� 323.7E a� c m 710.9z c� 0 83.7 0 j, 0 a E 133.9, 4- 0 24.8: 0 L a Q. 19.3( Q ti 16.2E m r r� 17.4, N r N Y 241.8, E 1,817.7' c m E 47.7, R .r r Q Page: 48 Packet Pg. 88 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222989 11/23/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 2017-9000-3 ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH ALDERWOOD INTERIE 6130 168TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 2019-4248-9 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 2022-5062-7 9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED 9TH/CASPER LANDSCAPED BED 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 2022-8945-0 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 2022-9166-2 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1 , CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #1 , 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2023-8937-5 STREET LIGHT 7601 RIDGE WAY / I STREET LIGHT 7601 RIDGE WAY / I 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 2028-0763-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2030-9778-7 WWTP: 10/14-11/15/16 200 2ND AVI WWTP: 10/14-11/15/16 200 2ND AVI 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 2036-5215-1 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 5.3.a Page: 49 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 26.5, m L 4- 371.6' c m 371.6' c� 371.6' o L 371.6' a E 97.7� 0 i m r 5,552.3E M N 8.3( Y E 17.3( r c m 29,994.2, E R .r r Q Page: 49 Packet Pg. 89 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222989 11/23/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 222990 11/23/2016 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 85191 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 2044-2584-7 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 2051-8438-5 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / N LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / N 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 2202-1638-6 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MF 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 2205-4757-4 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 236TH S1 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 Total: 2016-3456 CRS ON #2016-3456 SNO CO JAIL-( NET CR MINSTER FROM 8/2016 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 NET CR MINSTER FROM 9/2016 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 CR 7 WORK RELEASE @ $30 CAR/ 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 CR 11 WORK RELEASE @ $36 KIM 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 2016-3456 INV#2016-3456 SNO CO JAIL-OCT 2 44.33 BOOKINGS @ $116.14 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 49.17 MED/SPEC @ $52.01 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 31.33 MENTAL HEALTH @ $124.72 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 12 VIDEO COURT @ $115.50 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 18 WORK RELEASE @ $50 5.3.a Page: 50 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 197.1( a� L 78.8: a� c m 22.6, c� 0 82.5: j, ca a E 64.1( 'ru 41,560.55 U 4- 0 c� 0 -98.7( a Q. Q -666.6: -210.0( m -396.0( r M N 5,148.4E Y 2,557.3< E 3,907.4E c m 1,386.0( E t R .r r Q Page: 50 Packet Pg. 90 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222990 11/23/2016 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 222991 11/23/2016 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 222992 11/23/2016 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 222993 11/23/2016 040430 STONEWAY ELECTRIC SUPPLY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 272.67 HOUSING @ $89.38 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 Tota 1000424755 INV#1000424755 CUST #SSH0009 SCSO RANGE USAGE 10 HR 10/6 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 SCSO RANGE USAGE 9.5 HR 10/ 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 SCSO RANGE USAGE 9.5 OT 10/7 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 SCSO RANGE USAGE 9.5 HR 10/1 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 SCSO RANGE USAGE 10 HR 10/1 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 Tota 104757 WWTP: 10/3-10/26/16 ROLLOFFA 10/3-10/26/16 Ash Disposal 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 Tota S101788762.001 SEWER - SUPPLIES Sewer - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 222994 11/23/2016 074797 SUPER CHARGE MARKETING LLC 2798 5.3.a Page: 51 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 900.0( -0a 24,371.2z i 1 : 36,899.1E 5- a /1 m 580.0( 551.0( o /1 0, 590.3( a 7 551.0( 8/ 580.0( o 2,852.3( 0 S a Q. Q 2,889.8E 2,889.8E r ti m r 11.1E N r 1.0� w Total : 12.21 SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES NOVEME E M Social Media Services November 201 U 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 300.0( Total: 300.0( Page: 51 Packet Pg. 91 t R .r r a vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 222995 11/23/2016 075491 TAYLOR'S EXCAVATORS INC 222996 11/23/2016 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 222997 11/23/2016 075476 TOM MARKS PHOTO 222998 11/23/2016 070774 ULINE INC 222999 11/23/2016 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account E3DB.Pmt 8 E3DB.PMT 8 THRU 8/25/16 E3DB.Pmt 8 thru 8/25/16 112.000.68.595.33.65.00 E3DB.Ret 8 112.000.223.400 Tota INVO5254 FAC - DRINKING FOUNTAIN PART FAC - Drinking Fountain Parts 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Freight 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Tota 14955 FALL PHOTO SHOOT FOR TOURI 9775267572 C/A 671247844-00001 Cell Service-Eng 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 Cell Service Fac-Maint 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 Cell Service Parks Maint 5.3.a Page: 52 c ca U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 6,388.2( 9) -319.4' =5 1 : 6,068.7t aD c S S� 322.0 0 0 7.6: ca a 32.3' I : 362.0: c 0 750.0( o I : 750.0( a Q. DK Q E 93.2E c 111.1E t R .r r Q Page: 52 Packet Pg. 92 E 93.2E c 111.1E t R .r r Q Page: 52 Packet Pg. 92 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher 222999 223000 223001 223002 Date Vendor 11/23/2016 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 11/23/2016 075853 WAGENER, EMILY 11/23/2016 075155 WALKER MACY LLC Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 11.16 P3282.01-6 11/23/2016 071424 WASHINGTON ENERGY SERVICES BLD20161480 PO # Description/Account 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 Cell Service-PD 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 Cell Service-PD 104 Fund 104.100.41.521.21.42.00 Cell Service-PW Street 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 Cell Service-PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 Cell Service-PW Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Cell Service-WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 Total TRAVEL FOR TRAINING TO THE NH Travel for training to the NHRMA 001.000.22.518.10.43.00 Tota CIVIC MASTER PLAN OPEN HOU LABOR 125.000.64.576.80.41.00 CONSULTANTS 125.000.64.576.80.41.00 EXPENSES/REIMBUSEMENTS 125.000.64.576.80.41.00 Tota REFUND -DUPLICATE PERMIT REFUND -DUPLICATE PERMIT 5.3.a Page: 53 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 62.4: 275.6( aUi L =a 133.4z it a� c 19.4( 18.4, c�a 0 18.41 L>% ca a 55.7E 75.6: U 0 36.9E 900.61 0 a Q. Q 197.1( 1 : 197.1( m SE r M N 4,465.0( N 938.1( cYi E 372.0< f° 1 : 5,775.1 < r c m E t R .r r Q Page: 53 Packet Pg. 93 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 223002 11/23/2016 071424 WASHINGTON ENERGY SERVICES (Continued) 223003 11/23/2016 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL T1700032 223004 11/23/2016 074311 WASHINGTON TOURISM ALLIANCE 2096 223005 11/23/2016 070180 WATAI 223006 11/23/2016 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 2017 DUES - ROTH 9834119 9836439 PO # Description/Account 001.000.257.620 Tota INV T1700032 EDM301 - SACKVIL INSTRUCTION COSTS 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 CLASSROOM COSTS 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 MEALS AT WSP ACADEMY 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 FACILITY SURCHARGE - 20 DAYS 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 COURSE MATERIALS 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 Tota MEMBERSHIP WASHINGTON TO Washington Tourism Alliance annua 120.000.31.575.42.49.00 Tota WATAI 2017 DUES - ROTH - EDM 2017 WATAI DUES - ROTH 001.000.41.521.22.49.00 Tota FAC MAINT - LIQUID DEFOAMER Fac Maint - Liquid Defoamer 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 FAC MAINT - DISINFECTANT, TO Fac Maint - Disinfectant, Towels, 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 5.3.a Page: 54 c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 0 0- 75.0( a) 1 : 75.0( a� on LE 600.0( m 278.0( c ca 312.0( o 119.4( a 30.0( I: 1,339.4$ 6 4- 0 OF I > 0 500.0( a I : 500.0( Q r ti 60.0( " I : 60.0( M N 62.4( 6.1, WE c 1,081.7( t R .r r Q Page: 54 Packet Pg. 94 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223006 11/23/2016 075635 WCP SOLUTIONS 223007 11/23/2016 075215 WELCOME COMMUNICATIONS 223008 11/23/2016 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 223009 11/23/2016 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 223010 11/23/2016 072634 WHISTLE W ORKW EAR Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9841129 FAC MAINT - SUPPLIES Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Tota 0081 INV#0081 - EDMONDS PD ENDURA SINGLE UNIT CHARGER 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.35.00 Tota 0000031662 SIGNALS - SIGNAL HEADS FOR 9 Signals - Signal Heads for 95th & S 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Freight 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Tota 18457 DOUGLAS FIR MEMORIAL & COL TREES 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 5.3.a Page: 55 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 106.0' -0a U a� L 159.7z 15.6E 1,431.6E c c� 49.7E ca a 10.4E E .2 5.9' U 1 : 66.1; c 5 0 R 0- 755.7E Q 97.3' r ti 83.6( 1 : 936.7' r M N r N 340.0( E 33.3� 'ca Total: 373.3, u r TR-317478 FAC MAINT - WORK COAT - J ROLF a0i Fac Maint - Work Coat - J Rolfe E t R .r r Q Page: 55 Packet Pg. 95 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223010 11/23/2016 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR 223011 11/23/2016 075852 WHITTAKER, SHARON 223012 11/23/2016 075080 WINNIFORD, SUSAN 223013 11/23/2016 065980 WONDERWARE PACWEST Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 9.2% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 5.3.a Page: 56 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; U) 0 a 134.9E 12.4. L Total : 147.4( 'a Nov 2016 REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO PRESIDII a REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO PRESIDII m 11072016 SIN000936 223014 11/23/2016 066678 WSDA PESTICIDE MGMT DIVISION 39844-McGOWAN 46620-EDHOUSE 77736-DILL 80090-BIRD 001.000.23.512.50.43.00 180.3( -0 Total: 180.3E r- 11072016 REFUND 11072016 REFUND 001.000.239.200 Tota WWTP: WONDERWARE CUSTOM 2017 WONDERWARE CUSTOMER 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Tota 2017 WSDA PESTICIDE LICENSE 2017 WSDA PESTICIDE LICENSE 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 2017 WSDA PESTICIDE LICENSE 2017 WSDA PESTICIDE LICENSE 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 2017 WSDA PESTICIDE LICENSE 2017 WSDA PESTICIDE LICENSE 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 2017 WSDA PESTICIDE LICENSE 2017 WSDA PESTICIDE LICENSE 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 Tota 0 60.0( 60.0( . E U w 0 13,395.0( > 0 L 1,312.7, Q Q. 1 : 14,707.7' Q R ti R 33.0( r R M R N r 33.0( R Y R 33.0( R R r 33.0( a0i 1 : 132.0( E R .r r a Page: 56 Packet Pg. 96 vchlist 11 /28/2016 9:30:13AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223015 11/23/2016 051050 WYATT, ARTHUR D 223016 11/23/2016 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 117 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 117 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account 71 LEOFF 1 REIMBURSEMENT LEOFF 1 Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 Tota 0185644 TRAFFIC - WHITE VINYL DATE ST Traffic - White Vinyl Date Stickers B 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 0185751 TRAFFIC - ALUM BLANKS 30X6 . Traffic - Alum Blanks 30x6 .080 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Alum Sign Blanks 12"x18"x.080" 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Rivets 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 Tota Bank tota Total voucher 5.3.a Page: 57 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; N 0 a am 166.0( 1 : 166.0( i =a IC 4- /V c 600.0( 8.4 1 r- 0 59.6< 08 a 300.0( U 185.0( o 0 105.0( o L a Q. 30.2z Q 60.7E ti 1,349.1, w 1 : 458,585.3E r M N S : 458,585.3( r N Y V E V Page: 57 Packet Pg. 97 5.3.b vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 223017 12/1/2016 041695 3M XAM3522 SS38160 TRAFFIC - 1 ROLL WHITE HI PRIS Traffic - 1 Roll White Hi Prismatic S Page: c ca lid U a� Amoun N 0 0- ht� IV � 307.5( =a 29.2, a� c m 450.0( c� 330.0( o L 300.0( a E 102.6( 'M 1,519.3, 0 0 c� 0 L 168.8E a 156.7z m 178.8E r r 0 N 171.3, Y E 152.6E TU r c m 150.2( E t R .r r Q Page: 1 Packet Pg. 98 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 223018 12/1/2016 070322 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC (Continued) 223019 12/1/2016 072189 ACCESS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 1673405 223020 223021 223022 223023 12/1/2016 070976 AMERESCO INC 9 4 12/1/2016 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 035353-16102 12/1/2016 073573 ANIXTER 12/1/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 23K-134158 1988309327 1988890454 Description/Account COURT SHREDDING COURT SHREDDING 001.000.23.512.50.49.00 Tota Tota WWTP: 10/24/16 C431 PH 5 ENER Retainage 423.100.223.400 Construction 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 WWTP: 10/24/16 C431 PH 5 ENER Professional Services & Tax 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 Tota APA DUES- ROBERT CHAVE AICP APA DUES- ROBERT CHAVE AICP 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 Tota SPRAY PARK BUILDING LOCKS PART NO. CS411440 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 PART NO. CS723684 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Tota PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVIC 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 5.3.b Page: 2 c ca lid U W _ Amoun }; 1 : 978.7E 0 CL a� 77.0E :a 1 : 77.01 a� G m -3,031.2, r- 66,565.6' o G a 96,579.0( , 1 : 160,113.3$ w 0 E 625.0( o I : CL 625.0( a Q r ti 102.2 , m r 148.0E r 0 N 24.5: 1 : 274.8i Y E f° 33.8' c m 3.2' E R .r r Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 99 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223023 12/1/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1988901220 WWTP: UNIFORMS, TOWELS & M wwtp uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 wwtp mats & towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 1988901221 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVIC 5.3.b Page: 3 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 24.9( a� L 2.4z =a A d c 5.1( 115.9E c�a E E � � T: T: 5 0 0.5( c� a 11.31 � w 49.7( 0 4.8, o T� 0- Q. Q 1.6( ti 6.1( � 6.1( r T: c N 6.1( Y 6.1( •� 6.1< c 0.1( t R .r r Q Page: 3 Packet Pg. 100 Packet Pg. 100 5.3.b vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 12/01/2016 8:29:30AM City of Edmonds ca lid Bank code : usbank U W Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun }; 223023 12/1/2016 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) a 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6( 9.8% Sales Tax }, 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6( L 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.6( 9.8% Sales Tax c 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.6( 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.5( c�a 1988905250 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT mm o FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.6E a FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.5( C 9.8% Sales Tax cu 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 1.8( o Total: 313.6( a Q 223024 12/1/2016 065950 ATS ELECTRO-LUBE INTL INC 97790 WWTP: BATTERY PACK Panasonic Battery Pack ti 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 441.0( v Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 35.8E r r Total: 476.8E c N 223025 12/1/2016 001777 AURORA PLUMBING & ELECTRIC INV213323 PM: SUPPLIES HAZEL MILLER PLA; w PM: SUPPLIES HAZEL MILLER PLA, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 22.9E E 9.8% Sales Tax .@ 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.2E r Total: 25.2( 223026 12/1/2016 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT 1220 DESIGN FOR BUSINESS EVENT AD R .r r a Page: 4 Packet Pg. 101 5.3.b vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 12/01/2016 8:29:30AM City of Edmonds ca lid Bank code : usbank U W Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun }; 223026 12/1/2016 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT (Continued) 0 Design of ad for 11/29/16 business CL 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 275.0( Total: 275.0( i 223027 12/1/2016 072455 BEAR COMMUNICATIONS INC 4536878 PW - RADIO ANTENAAND INSTALL, =a = PW - Radio Antena and Installation 4- c 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 1,145.0( 9.8% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 112.2' Total: 1,257.2' o 0 223028 12/1/2016 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 6989 FLEET AUTO PROPANE 498.3 GAL Fleet Auto Propane 498.3 Gal Q" 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 521.7E . 7065 FLEET AUTO PROPANE 590.1 GAL f° Fleet Auto Propane 590.1 Gal c 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 588.5 @ 9767 FLEET AUTO PROPANE 515.2 GAL > Fleet Auto Propane 515.2 Gal 0 a 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 514.9z Q Total: 1,625.2E •• 223029 12/1/2016 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 5175 HATHA YOGA GNTL 5175 HATHA YOGA GENTLE i 5175 HATHA YOGA GENTLE 00 1.000.64.571.27.4 1.00 426.1E 5184 HATHA YOGA 5184 HATHA YOGA c 5184 HATHA YOGA N 00 1.000.64.571.27.4 1.00 638.5E w 5190 PILATES 5190 PILATES 5190 PILATES E 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 Total: 1,341.8, 223030 12/1/2016 075278 BURNS, HOUSTON 10/04 FIELD ATTEND 10/04-10/21 FIELD ATTENDANT SOF r a0i 10/04-10/21 FIELD ATTENDANT SOF E t R .r r Q Page: 5 Packet Pg. 102 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223030 12/1/2016 075278 BURNS, HOUSTON 223031 12/1/2016 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 223032 12/1/2016 075627 CAPITOL STRATEGIES Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 5.3.b Page: 6 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 0- 57.5( a) Total : 57.5( 41 16709145 COPIER RENTAL COPIER RENTAL 001.000.23.523.30.45.00 16709147 CITY CLERKS COPIER LEASE CITY CLERKS COPIER LEASE 11/ 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 16709148 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 3091/05 m L 65.3: c m 01 � 340.3( 33.3( 21 21 21 r a 0 209.6' •� U 20.5z c O -cu- C 0 82.4: a Q' Q 32.3z r ti 3.10 m r r c o 26.4z 04 N Y 2.6( u 1 : 816.2E E B U r c 5,000.0( E t U R .r r a Page: 6 Packet Pg. 103 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 223032 12/1/2016 075627 075627 CAPITOL STRATEGIES (Continued) 223033 12/1/2016 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 5032 DRAW 223034 12/1/2016 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 240531 XC24203 223035 12/1/2016 075862 CHASE 451974118001 223036 12/1/2016 075330 COBALT GEOSERVICES 1079 PO # Description/Account Tota 5032 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING 5032 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Tota FLEET - SHOP SUPPLIES Fleet - Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 WWTP: 11/18/16 CYLINDER REN nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxid 2017 LTGO REFINANCE CHASE B LTGO Refinance - interest payment 001.000.39.592.18.83.16 LTGO Refinance - interest payment 111.000.68.592.95.83.16 LTGO Refinance - interest payment 126.000.39.592.75.83.16 LTGO Refinance - interest payment 421.000.74.592.34.83.16 LTGO Refinance - interest payment 422.000.72.592.31.83.16 LTGO Refinance - interest payment 423.000.75.592.35.83.16 LTGO Refinance - interest payment 423.100.76.592.39.83.16 Tota E6MB.SERVICES THRU NOVEMB E6MB.Services thru November 201 5.3.b Page: 7 e r a Page: 7 Packet Pg. 104 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223036 12/1/2016 075330 COBALT GEOSERVICES 223037 12/1/2016 074448 COBURN, DOUG 223038 12/1/2016 075042 COVERALL OF WASHINGTON Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 11/17 GYM ATTEND 7100168092 223039 12/1/2016 075864 DEPT OF REVENUE AUDIT DIVISION E3DE.Ret. Release 223040 12/1/2016 070864 DEX MEDIA IIIjCiI ►[.��L: 610030216509 223041 12/1/2016 070244 DUANE HARTMAN & ASSOCIATES INC 16-2618.1 223042 12/1/2016 071842 EATON CORPORATION 45486017 PO # Description/Account 125.000.64.576.80.41.00 Tota 11/17 GYM ATTEND VOLLEYBALL 11/17 GYM ATTEND VOLLEYBALL 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Tota WWTP: 11/1-11/30/16 JANITORIA 1/1-11/30/16 JANITORIAL SERVIC 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 Tota E3DE.RETAINAGE RELEASE TO E3DE.Retainage Release to DOR 112.000.223.400 Tota C/A 730211600 11/2016 Web Hosting for Internet 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 C/A 730211599 Basic e-commerce hosting 11/02/16 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 Tota E6FB.TO 16-03.SERVICES THRU E6FB.TO 16-03.Services thru 11/20 422.200.72.594.31.41.00 Tota WWTP: ENG. SERVICES TEST 5 ENG. SERVICES TEST 5 MAGNU 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 5.3.b Page: 8 L c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 0 a 1,304.0( o I: 1,304.0( a� E E .• 4 30.0( c 1 : 30.0( ; c E f° 514.0( o I : 514.0( M a DC 3,387.7£ ,- I : 3,387.71 c c� 0 a Q. 39.9E Q r 39.9E 11 M� M 1 : 79.9( 0 /1 867.2( Y 1 : 867.2( E I � r 3,850.0( E 377.3( R .r r Q Page: 8 Packet Pg. 105 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 223042 12/1/2016 071842 071842 EATON CORPORATION (Continued) 223043 12/1/2016 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 5348 RAFIPOUR 223044 12/1/2016 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 3-01808 3-03575 3-07490 3-07525 3-07709 3-09350 3-09800 3-29875 3-38565 PO # Description/Account Tota 5348 SURI RAFIPOUR YOUTH SC 5348 SURI RAFIPOUR YOUTH SC 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 Tota LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL LIFT STATION #11 6807 157TH PL 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWD CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWD 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 HAINES WHARF PARK DRINKING HAINES WHARF PARK DRINKING 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AV LIFT STATION #12 16100 75TH AVF 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST LIFT STATION #15 7701 168TH ST 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #4 8313 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT LIFT STATION #10 17612 TALBOT 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA D LIFT STATION #9 8001 SIERRA D 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410 SPRINKLER FOR RHODIES 18410 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 Tota 5.3.b Page: 9 c ca U a� _ Amoun }; I: 4,227.3( a m Hi Hi U a) 75.0( 1 : 75.0( 4- a� S' m S' AL f° AL o 319.0' F Q- F E 83.8( E o M 41.1 1 o S a S 41.1-1 Q D D r 83.8( .. R tD R c 41.1 N R R / w 41.1 1 E c •� c v 41.1 I : 733.6: t R .r r Q Page: 9 Packet Pg. 106 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds 5.3.b Page: 10 c ca lid U a� Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun j 223045 12/1/2016 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH728548 P&R: BRACKETT'S LANDING JETTY o P&R: BRACKETT'S LANDING JETTY a m 001.000.64.576.80.41.40 51.6( EDH732207 CITY NOTICE 2016 COMP PLAN CITY NOTICES - 2016 COMP PLAN) 001.000.25.514.30.41.40 53.3. Total: 104.9, c m 223046 12/1/2016 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU41964 FLEET SHOP SUPPLIES Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 23.8 - ' _ 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 2.3z a Total: 26.2' 223047 12/1/2016 067042 FINAL TOUCH FINISHING 5041 ETIQUETTE 5041 ETIQUETTE HOLIDAY MANNEI f° U 5041 ETIQUETTE HOLIDAY MANNEI o 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 300.0( -(; Total: 300.0( c L 223048 12/1/2016 011900 FRONTIER 253-007-4989 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) a SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) Q 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 30.9E r 253-012-9166 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES ti TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 161.7 0 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES c 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 300.4z N 253-012-9189 WWTP: 11/25-12/24/16 AUTO DIALE w 11/25-12/24/16 AUTO DIALER - 1 VC 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 41.3z E 253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 19.7( TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE t 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 36.7( R .r r Q Page: 10 Packet Pg. 107 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 223048 12/1/2016 011900 FRONTIER (Continued) 253-017-4360 425-712-8347 425-771-0158 425-771-5553 425-776-6829 509-022-0049 223049 12/1/2016 075847 GERDES, KIRK BLD20161337 223050 12/1/2016 071897 GONZALEZ, CHRISTINE 15294 223051 12/1/2016 012190 GORSUCH, BRUCE 5059 GENEALOGY 101 PO # Description/Account TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHON CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHON 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND F FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND F 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 WWTP: 11/25-12/24/16 AUTO DIAL 11/25-12/24/16 AUTO DIALER - 1 B 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL AC LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL AC 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 Tota REFUND -FEE COLLECTED WITH REFUND -FEE COLLECTED WITH 001.000.257.620 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 5059 GENEALOGY 101 PLUS 5059 GENEALOGY 101 PLUS 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 Tota Tota 5.3.b Page: 11 E E A} c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 0 a a) 46.7 0 aUi L =a 86.8E c 68.2( ca A} o j 131.3( , E f° a U 114.4, P AI o 131.3( �a CE o L Cf a 26.2� Q 1 : 1,196.21, r El E m 98.0( r 1 : 98.0( o N N Y 104.3E E I : 104.3E 'M r c m 117.0( t R .r r Q Page: 11 Packet Pg. 108 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223051 12/1/2016 012190 012190 GORSUCH, BRUCE 223052 12/1/2016 012560 HACH COMPANY 223053 12/1/2016 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 223054 12/1/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 10205020 39440 2866806 2879937 2881015 2882726 2883182 PO # Description/Account WWTP: PH PAPER PH PAPER 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Tota Tota STORMWATER PLAN REVIEW SU Stormwater Plan Review Support th 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 Tota CALENDARS- OFFICE SUPPLIES Calendars- Development Services 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 CALENDARS FOR FINANCE Calendars 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 WWTP: SHARPIE PERM. MARKER SHARPIE PERM. MARKERS -FINE 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 CHAIR FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ED CHAIR FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ED 001.000.31.514.23.35.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.35.00 FLOOR MATS FOR RANGER OFFI FLOOR MATS FOR RANGER OFFI 5.3.b Page: 12 c ca hd U a� _ Amoun }; 1 : 117.0( 0 m m 63.9( 52.4: c m 11.4' I : 127.8, r- P o ru M 2,363.2( 1 : 2,363.2( . U w 0 717.51 > 0 a Q. 24.5: Q r 2.4' � & t° r 25.1( c N 2.4( w U Y U E 41.6' C C t R .r r Q Page: 12 Packet Pg. 109 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223054 12/1/2016 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 223055 12/1/2016 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 223056 12/1/2016 067074 JAMES, SCOTT Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 001.000.31.514.23.35.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.35.00 2883350 TELEPHONE SHOULDER REST Telephone Shoulder rest 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 2884972 WWTP: REDIFORM ACCOUNT BO REDIFORM ACCOUNT BOOK 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 2884976 COPY PAPER- DSD copy paper- DSD 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 Tota 300-10016180 UNIT E107PO - WIRE Unit E107PO - Wire 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 300-10016236 UNIT E107PO - SUPPLIES Unit E107PO - Supplies 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 5.3.b Page: 13 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 146.4( -a) 14.3E aa) L =a 4. 13.8' c m 1.3E C ca 0 18.1E j, M a 1.7£ U 131.7: o I: 1,566.0' 0 L a Q. Q 45.9( r 4.5( m r 428.8< o N 42.0< Y Total: 521.2E u E Sept 2016 2016 W FOA CONFERENCE MILEAC ca 2016 W FOA Conference Mileage & L 001.000.31.514.20.43.00 649.3. c Total: 649.3, E t R .r r Q Page: 13 Packet Pg. 110 5.3.b vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 12/01/2016 8:29:30AM City of Edmonds ca lid Bank code : usbank U a� Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun }; 223057 12/1/2016 074326 KIMBALL MIDWEST 5266230 FLEET SHOP - STAINLESS STEEL F o Fleet Shop - Stainless Steel Paint a 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 11.3( 9.8% Sales Tax a� L 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 1.1' =a Total: 12.4' d 223058 12/1/2016 016600 KROESENS INC 40660 INV#40660 - EDMONDS PD - POFF m TT DOUBLE MAG POUCH 001.000.41.521.21.35.00 40.0( TT GLOVE HOLDER 0 001.000.41.521.21.35.00 19.0( PROTECH POUCH ES-RADIO,CUFF, a 001.000.41.521.21.35.00 76.0( GLOVES 001.000.41.521.21.35.00 25.0( CLEAR GLASSES o 001.000.41.521.21.35.00 35.0( 0 9.8% Sales Tax o L 001.000.41.521.21.35.00 19.1' 0- Total: 214.1' Q 223059 12/1/2016 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 11182015-01 INV#11182015-01 EDMONDS PD - O r 11 CAR WASHES @ $5.04(INC TX) ' 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 55.4z Total: 55.41 r r O 223060 12/1/2016 075716 MALLORY PAINT STORE INC E0070888 FAC - PAINT N FAC - Paint w 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 17.9� 9.6% Sales Tax E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.7' ca Total: 19.7( r c 223061 12/1/2016 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 88440444 WWTP: PIANO HINGE PIANO HINGE t R .r r a Page: 14 Packet Pg. 111 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 223061 12/1/2016 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 88612607 WWTP: SCREW -PIN SHACKLE, C SCREW -PIN SHACKLE, COUPLIN 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Tota 223062 12/1/2016 075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA 5227 FELDENKRAIS 5227 FELDENKRAIS 5227 FELDENKRAIS 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 Tota 223063 12/1/2016 069582 MORRIS WAGNER 023 LOG CABIN - CLEAN, STAIN, MAIN Log Cabin - Clean, Stain, Maint 120.000.31.575.42.41.50 9.8% Sales Tax 120.000.31.575.42.41.50 Tota 223064 12/1/2016 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC ME106971 UNIT 106 - MIRROR CONTROL S 5.3.b Page: 15 0 c� a 254.2E 1 : 254.2E T - W r a Page: 15 Packet Pg. 112 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 223065 12/1/2016 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES (Continued) E4JC.Services thru 10/31/16 421.200.74.594.34.41.00 15-1715-15 ESKA.SERVICES THRU 10/31/16 ESKA.Services thru 10/31/16 421.200.74.594.34.41.00 16-1852-4 E6JB.SERVICES THRU 10/31/16 E6JB.Services thru 10/31/16 421.200.74.594.34.41.00 Tota 223066 12/1/2016 067694 NC POWER SYSTEMS CO 223067 12/1/2016 074724 NEWMAN-BURROW LLC PSCS0577834 PS W O0119106 reil:N 223068 12/1/2016 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY S7562780.001 5.3.b Page: 16 U) 0 a m 6,602.5( 5D 7,686.5� a� c m 23,654.0( c I: 37,943.05 ca 0 UNIT 106 - SUPPLIES Unit 106 - Supplies a 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 707.7: Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 17.0( U 9.5% Sales Tax 0 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 68.8E WWTP: MAINTENANCE ON SVC CC 0 0 MAINTENANCE ON SVC CONTR & I a 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 3,964.8z Q' Q 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 388.5E r WINTER DIGITAL CRAZE WINTER DIGITAL CRAZE 001.000.64.571.22.49.00 WWTP: SIEM BREAKER FSIEM BREAKER 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Tota Tota ti 1 : 5,146.9, m r r 0 514.0( N 1 : 514.0( w E 89.1 E r c 8.71 E t R .r r a Page: 16 Packet Pg. 113 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 223068 12/1/2016 024960 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPAN (Continued) 223069 12/1/2016 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 420475 448160 496738 Description/Account Tota P&R: OFFICE SUPPLIES P&R: MECHANICAL PENCILS 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 P&R: OFFICE SUPPLIES P&R: GUEST CHAIRS FOR CARRI 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 P&R: 8.5X14 PAPER 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 5.3.b Page: 17 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 97.9, a am m 19.4( 1.9( m 621.8( E, o 819.2£ a 52.3£ •� U 85.4: p Total : 1,600.21 223070 12/1/2016 073714 OLBRECHTS & ASSOC PLLC OCT2016 HEARING EXAMINER FEES- OCTO( o a Hearing examiner fees- October Q- Q 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 2,608.0( PLN2016-0029 Madrona r 001.000.245.967 844.0( PLN20160043- Meadowdale ., 001.000.245.967 m 468.0( r Total : 3,920.0( c N 223071 12/1/2016 075060 O'NEILL, CAITLIN 11/23 PRESCHOOL SUB 11/23 PRESCHOOL SUB 11/23 PRESCHOOL SUB N 001.000.64.571.29.41.00 42.0( E Total 223072 12/1/2016 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 3685-240878 UNIT 23 - DISC BRAKE PAD SET r Unit 23 - Disc Brake Pad Set 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 88.7, R .r r Q Page: 17 Packet Pg. 114 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223072 12/1/2016 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 3685-240883 3685-240895 3685-240908 3685-240909 il:�:li�Z�l)v!S[Ij 3685-240965 3685-241057 PO # Description/Account 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 23 - PARTS Unit 23 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 34 -- WIPER BLADES Unit 34 -- Wiper Blades 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 34 - PARTS Unit 34 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 34 RETURNS Unit 34 Returns 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 17 - WIPER BLADES Unit 17 - Wiper Blades 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 15 - FILTER Unit 15 - Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 23 - AXLE SEAL Unit 23 - Axle Seal 5.3.b Page: 18 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 8.6� a� L 78.3, d c 7.6£ c c� 20.6: o L 2.0, a E 45.5, w 0 4.4E 0 L Q 0. -13.1z Q m r 25.2, r r Q Page: 18 Packet Pg. 115 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223072 12/1/2016 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 223073 12/1/2016 072539 OTAK INC-WASHINGTON 223074 12/1/2016 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3685-241067 UNIT 23 - AXEL SEAL Unit 23 - Axel Seal 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3685-241134 UNIT 23 - RETURNS Unit 23 - Returns 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota 111600234 E6DA.SERVICES THRU 11/4/16 E6DA.Services thru 11/4/16 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 Tota 00082027 UNIT 47 - PARTS Unit 47 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 00082038 UNIT 47 - CARTRIDGE Unit 47 - Cartridge 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.3.b Page: 19 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a 39.1( -0) 3.8z a0) L =a 78.3. m 7.6( c� 0 -39.1( j, ca a -3.81 E 366.4: U 4- 0 M 7,858.4� c 7,858.4t a Q w 20.Z r r 0 4.0( N N Y 264.2- E 16.40 r c m 27.5( E t R .r r Q Page: 19 Packet Pg. 116 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 223074 12/1/2016 002203 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY (Continued) 223075 12/1/2016 072878 PACIFIC COAST CHEMICALS CO 168637 223076 12/1/2016 030410 PUGET SOUND BUSINESS JOURNAL 21392 223077 223078 12/1/2016 030400 PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY 20170026 12/1/2016 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200000704821 200002411383 200007876143 200009595790 200011439656 PO # Description/Account Tota WWTP: WILSON CLAY Wilson Clay 423.000.76.535.80.31.55 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.55 9.8% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.55 5.3.b Page: 20 c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 1 : 353.7( a m m 2,940.0( 4. 574.9( c m 344.4 , -0 Total : 3,859.4' BUSINESS EVENT 11/29/16 ADVER' o L Business Event (11/29/16) Advertisei ca 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 3,100.0( Total : 3,100.0( . WWTP: 2017 OPERATING PERMIT 1 w 2017 Operating Permit FAC. ID 1406, G 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 29,270.5' > Tota FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 7 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 7 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOW DOI YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOW DOI 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTO OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTO 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH S FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH S 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AV FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AV 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 I: 29,270.5' a Q. 0( Q 0( 1,230.0E ti N N T N � r 151.9, IL N C N 167.8 0 Y T; E 377.6, E r E 99.0, E R .r r a Page: 20 Packet Pg. 117 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223078 12/1/2016 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 200016558856 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200016815843 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 200019375639 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200019895354 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200020415911 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 200021829581 WWTP: 10/20-11/18/16 200 2ND AVE 10/20-11/18/16 200 2ND AVE S / ME 423.000.76.535.80.47.63 200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 5.3.b Page: 21 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 0 a am 143.1E L 490.2, c m 206.1 £ 0 122.4E a E 125.2E 4- 0 67.8: Q 67.8E 67.8E w r r 67.8! c N 67.8< Y E 601.0, c m 144.6, E R .r r Q Page: 21 Packet Pg. 118 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 223078 12/1/2016 046900 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 223079 12/1/2016 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 5-011440 223080 12/1/2016 075861 ROTARY CLUB OF LYNNWOOD 223081 12/1/2016 074431 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST LLC 223082 12/1/2016 074911 SEATTLE HEALTHY POOLS 223083 12/1/2016 074086 SIGNON 5-011523 4-31635 201613879 421 Description/Account UNIT 455 - BATTERY Unit 455 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 UNIT 54 - BATTERY Unit 54 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota Tota #4245-2677367 UTILITY REFUND #4245-2677367 Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 Tota E6MB.SURVEY SERVICES - 2 SA E6MB.Survey Services - 2 samples 125.000.64.594.75.65.00 Tota YOST POOL DRAIN COVERS YOST POOL DRAIN COVERS (3 H 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 3676 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 5291 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 Tota 5.3.b Page: 22 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 4,216.5E a am m 86.1: ia 8.4z m 86.1 < 8Az L, 189.V Q U 294.9( o 1 : 294.9E — MF a Q. 600.0( Q 1 : 600.0( -ct r ti O r 345.0( r 0 N 33.8' 1 : 378.8' E 188.4 1 c m E t 188.4-, .r r a Page: 22 Packet Pg. 119 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223083 12/1/2016 074086 074086 SIGNON 223084 12/1/2016 068489 SIRENNET.COM 223085 12/1/2016 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Tota 0207797-IN UNITS E112,113,114PO - RED LED Units E112,113,114PO - Red LED Li 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 0208138-IN UNIT E119PR -AMBER Unit E119PR - Amber 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 0208144-IN UNIT 779- CLEAR Unit 779- Clear 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0208414-IN UNIT Ell 1 PO - RED LENS Unit Ell PO - Red Lens 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 Tota 5088 SKYHAWKS 5088 SKYHAWKS GRASSHOPPE 5.3.b Page: 23 c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 376.91 a am L I U m 754.2( 73.9' c m 612.0( R 59.9E ca a 145.9E •� U 9.1' o 15.2( p L a Q. Q 412.2( r 40.4( 1 : 2,122.9E 0 c14 141.4: w U E 258.7E .� Page: 23 Packet Pg. 120 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 223085 12/1/2016 065803 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY (Continued) 223086 12/1/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2003-4823-3 2003-8645-6 2004-6859-3 2004-9314-6 2006-3860-9 2007-1403-8 2007-4860-6 2008-6520-2 2009-4334-8 2011-9708-4 2012-3682-5 2012-6598-0 PO # Description/Account Tota TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDAL CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDAL 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #4 8311 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION MAPLEWOOD PARK IRRIGATION 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTO OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTO 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST S TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST S 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHST LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHST 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 SEAVIEW PARK SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 FISHING PIER FISHING PIER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL 5.3.b Page: 24 E E D D N c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 1 : 555.4E 0 CL am (VW � 41.3z 15 .• d c 60.Z 316.4z — M M a 15.7: N U 235.1 o 0 19.9. a IV W Q- Q 15.7: r RE RE 80.4( r V c V N 40.7E w E 67.8E .2 U r c 121.6( E R .r r Q Page: 24 Packet Pg. 121 5.3.b vchlist Voucher List Page: 25 12/01/2016 8:29:30AM City of Edmonds ca lid Bank code : usbank U a� Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun }; 223086 12/1/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) a LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 192.1 2013-2711-1 PINE ST PARK L PINE ST PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 17.4. 2013-7496-4 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P c LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 20.0, 2015-7289-8 TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 117 3RD AVE S / ME o 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 44.2' j, 2015-8215-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W f° a TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 25.3' 2015-9448-8 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S o 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 18.8� 2016-1195-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W o TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W L Q- Q. 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 27.3: Q 2016-5690-7 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN,( DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN,( 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 134.0z v 2017-6210-1 415 5TH AVE S m 415 5TH AVE S r 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 r 24.3E c 2017-8264-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � N TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � (n 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 17.4, 2019-0786-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW E TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW f° 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 28.6E 2019-2991-6 WWTP: 10/23-11/21/16 FLOW METE m 10/23-11/21/16 FLOW METER 2321! E 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 16.8E R .r r a Page: 25 Packet Pg. 122 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 223086 12/1/2016 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 2020-8787-0 2022-8912-0 2024-2158-2 2024-3924-6 2026-2041-5 2042-9221-3 2044-6743-5 2205-4758-2 223087 12/1/2016 075009 SOUNDVIEW DESIGN STUDIO 00010570 223088 12/1/2016 049500 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 835050976 PO # Description/Account LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / ME LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / ME 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGH LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGH 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METE CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIG MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIG 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN S CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN S 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 HAZEL MILLER PLAZA HAZEL MILLER PLAZA 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH A TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH A 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 WINTER CRAZE DESIGN WINTER CRAZE DESIGN 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 COURT MANUALS COURT MANUALS 001.000.23.512.50.49.00 Tota Tota 5.3.b Page: 26 l R VE VE o R 2,325.7: a A A 15.7: T o T 76.3� 0 a Q. Q 28.0� 48.0' m 4,386.41 r r O N N 1,273.5( cYi 1,273.5( E r c 338.1 £ t R .r r a Page: 26 Packet Pg. 123 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice 223088 12/1/2016 049500 049500 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST (Continued) 223089 12/1/2016 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 56939 223090 12/1/2016 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 223091 12/1/2016 075283 WAVE BROADBAND 223092 12/1/2016 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 223093 12/1/2016 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR 56945 110-11.81r1 8136 50 211 00055035 7212 TR-322491 PO # Description/Account Tota INV#56939 - EDMONDS PD TOW 1999 TOYOTA#ANL1162 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 UNIT 405 TOWING FEES Unit 405 Towing Fees 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 Tota P&R: TREE MAINTENANCE 3 BIRCH TREES - RAISE CANOPI 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 P&R: TREE MAINTENANCE 3 PEAR TREES & 1 CHERRY THE 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 9.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 Tota FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET S High Speed Internet service 12/01/1 001.000.31.518.87.42.00 Tota SE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 Tota PM: RAINCOAT 5.3.b Page: 27 c ca lid U a� Amoun }; 338.1E a am m 159.0( 15.5E c m 80.0( 7.8z L, 262.4; a E E� E: f° U 580.0( o 56.8z c a Q- 460.0( Q r 45.0E 1 : 1,141.9, r 6 0N 816.0( w 1 : 816.0( E 2 U 191.0! I : 191.0! m E t U R .r r Q Page: 27 Packet Pg. 124 vchlist 12/01 /2016 8:29:30AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 223093 12/1/2016 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR 223094 12/1/2016 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 78 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 78 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) TR-323532 1071 PO # Description/Account 5.3.b Page: 28 c ca lid U a� _ Amoun }; 0 0- PM: RAINCOAT - INCLUDES $7 DIS( 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 62.9£ 9.2% Sales Tax L 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 5.8( 15 PM: SAFETY VESTS SAFETY VESTS (1 MED 1 XL) INCLI 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 35.9£ 9.2% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 3.3' c�a Tota NOV-16 RETAINER Monthly Retainer 001.000.36.515.33.41.00 Tota Bank tota Total voucher 108.0i o L 0 a 17,430.0( I: 17,430.0( U 4- 0 I : 335,561.71 s : 335,561.71 a Q. Page: 28 Packet Pg. 125 5.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E61FE SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E41FA STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E51FA STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4J13 STR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades i016 E6DC STR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects i014 E6J13 SWR 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC WTR 2018/19 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3J13 STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens i012 E6FC STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E51-A STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA PRK City Spray Park c417 E41VIA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB STIR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB Revised 11/30/2016 Packet Pg. 126 5.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5J13 STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1 FM PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 E5FC STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5G13 STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive i011 E61FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STR SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB STR SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) s014 E6AA UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 11/30/2016 Packet Pg. 127 5.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title 1AA Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR ElCA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements - E1DA W Sunset Walkway Improveme STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives moor— errinville Creek Culvert Replacemen STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update 9th Avenue Improvement Projectis STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) North Talbot Road Drainage Improvement STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Studl c380 SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c427 Corridor Transportation Stud STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR R" c424 IF 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Av STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Driv STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th ElrS W Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR location (2013 FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STR E4CA c43 2014 Overlay Program i STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR E4CC 2014 Waterline Overlays STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STR Train Trench - Concept STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM 014 Drainage Improvements W STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM c435 ek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STM c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update F Public Safety Controls System Upgrades PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park F dmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System Revised 11/30/2016 Packet Pg. 128 5.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Protect Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title E5AB 2015 Traffic Calming STIR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program E5CB Epw 2015 Waterline Overlays SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays c474 Bikelink Project General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis 015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects rSTM E5FC 1W Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility STM E5FE c48 2th Ave & Sierra StormwatdWstem Improvements SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects SWR E5GB 0 ke Ballinger Trunk Sewer Stu WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects WTR E5J13 c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) WTR c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating FAC E5LA c476 A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers UTILITIES E5NA tandard Details Updates STIR E6AA s014 SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) STIR llff'i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program WTR i009 7r 2016 Waterline Overlays SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STIR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STIR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive WTA c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens KTM s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update STM E6FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs WR i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II SWR c492 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update WTR E6,113 i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects ilk WTR E6JC c493 2018/19 Waterline Replacement Project PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement 0 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) ayton Street Plaza PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor Revised 11/30/2016 Packet Pg. 129 5.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Protect Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STIR E1 DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements STIR ElCA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1 FIN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study SWR E2GB c390 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation STIR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STIR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STIR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM EYE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STIR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STIR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STIR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STIR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STIR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STIR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program WTR E4J13 c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STIR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals WTR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STIR E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STIR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Revised 11/30/2016 Packet Pg. 130 5.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title STIR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project STIR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects WTR E5JA c468 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects SWR E5GA c469 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects STIR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System STIR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming STM E5FC c472 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) WTR E5KA c473 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating STIR E5DA c474 Bikelink Project WTR E5CB c475 2015 Waterline Overlays FAC E5LA c476 AN Upgrades - Council Chambers PRK E6MB c477 FAC Band Shell Replacement General E5DB c478 Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis STM E5FD c479 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility PRK E6MA c480 Veteran's Plaza WWTP E5HA c481 WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications WTR E5J13 c482 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) STM E5FE c484 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements STIR E6DA c485 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) STM E6FB c486 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements SWR E6GB c488 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II STM E6FE c491 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs SWR E6GC c492 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project WTR E6JC c493 2018/19 Waterline Replacement Project STIR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements SWR E5CC i007 2015 Sewerline Overlays STIR E6CA i008 2016 Overlay Program WTR E6CB i009 2016 Waterline Overlays SWR E6CC i010 2016 Sewerline Overlays STM E6FA i011 Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive STM E6FC i012 3rd Ave Rain Gardens SWR E6GA i013 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project WTR E6JB i014 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects STIR E6AB i015 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion STIR E6DC i016 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades STM E7FG m013 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) UTILITIES E5NA solo Standard Details Updates SWR E5GB s011 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study UTILITIES E6JA s013 Utility Rate Update STIR E6AA s014 SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) STIR E6DB s016 ADA Transition Plan STM E6FD s017 Stormwater Comp Plan Update Revised 11/30/2016 Packet Pg. 131 5.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number FAC A/V Upgrades - Council Chambers c476 E5LA FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E41-A General Edmonds Waterfront Access Analysis c478 E5DB PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA PRK FAC Band Shell Replacement c477 E6MB PRK Veteran's Plaza c480 E6MA STM 12th Ave & Sierra Stormwater System Improvements c484 E5FE STM 183rd PI SW Storm Repairs c491 E6FE STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA STM 224th & 98th Drainage Improvements c486 E6FB STM 3rd Ave Rain Gardens 012 E6FC STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1 FM STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c472 E5FC STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Culvert Repair Under Puget Drive 011 E6FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) m013 E7FG STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC STM Seaview Park Infiltration Facility c479 E5FD STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Comp Plan Update s017 E6FD STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF STM Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STIR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) c424 E3DC STIR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STIR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA STIR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA STIR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB STIR 2016 Curb Ramp Upgrades 016 E6DC STIR 2016 Overlay Program i008 E6CA STIR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD STIR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STIR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) c425 E3DD Revised 11/30/2016 Packet Pg. 132 5.3.c PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Protect Title Number Number STIR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) c423 E3DB STR 238th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Hwy 99) c485 E6DA STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 ElCA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STIR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR ADA Transition Plan s016 E6DB STR Bikelink Project c474 E5DA STR Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion i015 E6AB STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STR SR104/City Park Mid -Block Crossing c454 E4DB STR SR99 Safety Improvements (224th to 216th) s014 E6AA STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STR Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA SWR 2013 Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA SWR 2015 Sewerline Overlays i007 E5CC SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA SWR 2016 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR 2016 Sewerline Overlays i010 E6CC SWR 2017 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project i013 E6GA SWR 2018/19 Sewerline Replacement Project c492 E6GC SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase II c488 E6GB SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study s011 E5GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC UTILITIES Standard Details Updates solo E5NA UTILITIES Utility Rate Update s013 E6JA WTR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC WTR 2015 Waterline Overlays c475 E5CB WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC WTR 2016 Waterline Overlays i009 E6CB WTR 2016 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA WTR 2017 Waterline Replacement Projects 014 E6JB WTR 2018/19 Waterline Replacement Project c493 E6JC WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3J13 WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) c482 E5JB WTR Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating c473 E5KA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WWTP WWTP Outfall Pipe Modifications c481 E5HA Revised 11/30/2016 Packet Pg. 133 Hour Type Hour Class 153 HOLIDAY Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 848 (11/21/2016 to 11/21/2016) Description HOLIDAY BUY BACK Hours Amount 4,558.50 4,558.50 193,180.60 $193,180.60 Total Net Pay: $140,395.74 5.3.d 11/29/2016 Packet Pg. 134 Hour Type Hour Class 149 KELLY DAY Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 849 (11/21/2016 to 11/21/2016) Description KELLY DAYS BUY BACK Hours Amount 1,260.75 1,260.75 54,241.97 $54,241.97 Total Net Pay: $41,976.24 5.3.e 11/29/2016 Packet Pg. 135 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 788 (11/16/2016 to 11/30/2016) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount -ed2 REGULAR HOURS Educational Pay Correction 0.00 -156.28 111 ABSENT NO PAY LEAVE 44.00 0.00 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 556.08 20,213.62 122 VACATION VACATION 1,172.75 41,550.81 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 171.00 6,171.13 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 29.80 991.43 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 172.00 6,391.62 129 SICK Police Sick Leave L & 1 100.00 3,892.05 130 COMP HOURS Holiday Compensation Used 9.00 295.95 131 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE 72.00 2,241.70 141 BEREAVEMENT BEREAVEMENT 44.00 1,408.74 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Day Used 147.00 6,305.68 153 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY BUY BACK 8.00 385.76 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 107.76 4,772.76 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 33.00 1,634.06 170 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL BASE PAY 700.00 8,000.00 174 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY 0.00 30.00 175 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICAL 0.00 2,821.24 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 14,135.51 513,330.47 191 REGULAR HOURS FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS 4.00 3,847.80 196 REGULAR HOURS LIGHT DUTY 97.00 3,847.39 205 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME .5 5.50 96.73 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 172.50 7,393.25 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 60.00 3,014.06 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 15.00 1,435.91 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 602.00 38,365.05 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 28.75 1,758.20 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 -214.03 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 806.34 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 2,535.24 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 61.25 0.00 603 COMP HOURS Holiday Comp 1.0 36.00 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 141.75 0.00 606 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 3.00 0.00 12/01/2016 Packet Pg. 136 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 788 (11/16/2016 to 11/30/2016) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 24.95 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 145.56 boc MISCELLANEOUS BOC II Certification 0.00 84.53 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstructionist 0.00 142.14 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 147.28 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 626.36 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 102.75 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 989.84 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 793.44 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 891.06 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 5,137.77 fmla ABSENT FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAID 33.25 0.00 hol HOLIDAY HOLIDAY 2,479.60 89,933.74 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 102.75 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 846.25 Ig10 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY 5.5% 0.00 396.36 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 737.53 Iq2 LONGEVITY PAY LONGEVITY PAY 4% 0.00 842.56 Iq3 LONGEVITY PAY LONGEVITY 6% 0.00 5,893.68 Iq4 LONGEVITY Lonqevity 1 % 0.00 218.33 Iq6 LONGEVITY Lonqevity .5% 0.00 275.57 Iq7 LONGEVITY Lonqevity 1.5% 0.00 969.54 Iq9 LONGEVITY Lonqevity 3.5% 0.00 82.46 melc COMP HOURS Medical leave Comp 6.28 289.03 mels SICK Medical Leave Sick 101.72 4,840.59 mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 200.57 pds MISCELLANEOUS Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 47.12 phy MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 1,975.24 prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SER 0.00 157.56 sd2.5% MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 2.5% 0.00 153.41 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5% 0.00 207.68 sqt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 157.56 slw SICK SICK LEAVE ADD BACK -2.87 0.00 str MISCELLANEOUS STREET CRIMES 0.00 418.92 12/01/2016 Packet Pg. 137 Hour Type Hour Class traf MISCELLANEOUS Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 788 (11/16/2016 to 11/30/2016) Description TRAFFIC Hours Amount 0.00 323.67 21, 346.63 Total Net Pay: $801,322.48 $539,935.17 5.3.f 12/01/2016 Packet Pg. 138 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 788 - 11/16/2016 to 11/30/2016 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 62508 12/05/2016 chap1 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 900.00 0.00 62509 12/05/2016 epoa EPOA-1 POLICE 1,265.00 0.00 62510 12/05/2016 epoa4 EPOA-4 POLICE SUPPORT 104.00 0.00 62511 12/05/2016 jhan JOHN HANCOCK 1,028.10 0.00 62512 12/05/2016 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 739.99 0.00 62513 12/05/2016 cope SEIU COPE 72.00 0.00 62514 12/05/2016 seiu SEIU LOCAL 925 4,150.86 0.00 62515 12/05/2016 uw UNITED WAY OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY 693.24 0.00 62516 12/05/2016 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 2,149.81 0.00 11,103.00 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 2480 12/05/2016 pens DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 281,006.50 0.00 2481 12/05/2016 aflac AFLAC 6,161.10 0.00 2485 12/05/2016 us US BANK 145,428.85 0.00 2486 12/05/2016 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 119,103.64 0.00 2488 12/05/2016 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,708.16 0.00 2489 12/05/2016 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 20,329.70 0.00 2490 12/05/2016 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 635.00 0.00 578,372.95 0.00 Grand Totals: 589,475.95 0.00 5.3.g 12/1/2016 Packet Pg. 139 Hour Type 129 co I re ed3 Iq3 slw traf Hour Class SICK MISCELLANEOUS EDUCATION PAY LONGEVITY PAY SICK MISCELLANEOUS Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 850 (11/01/2016 to 11/15/2016) Description Police Sick Leave L & I Collision Reconstruction ist EDUCATION PAY 6% LONGEVITY 6% SICK LEAVE ADD BACK TRAFFIC Hours 88.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 Amount 3,425.00 34.25 205.50 205.50 0.00 102.75 168.00 $3,973.00 Total Net Pay: $3,230.04 5.3.h 12/01/2016 Packet Pg. 140 5.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 October 2016 Monthly Budgetary Financial Report Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Sarah Mager Background/History <Type or insert Info here> Staff Recommendation No action needed; informational only. Narrative October 2016 Monthly Budgetary Financial Report Attachments: October 2016 Monthly Financial Report Packet Pg. 141 O 0 O 00 M �o N 0 Z O z r 00 c 0 C) M D 70 mn z D z 0 D r 70 M MU O 70 0 O mn M 0 9 O z 0 00 0 ►�-Tt Attachment: October 2016 Monthly Financial Report (1716 : October 2016 Monthly Budgetary Financial Report) I 5.4.a I Page 1 of 1 CITY OF EDMO NDS REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount No. Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received 001 GENERAL FUND $ 39,352,810 $ 28,691,238 $ 29,407,186 $ 9,945,624 759 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 278,770 140,891 141,661 137,109 519 011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 6,660 7,070 8,322 (1,662) 1259 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 723,146 33,082 14,446 708,700 29 013 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND 370 396 475 (105) 1289 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,000 6,434 2,548 2,452 519 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1 2,505,000 253,162 1,969,437 535,563 799 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 153,000 11,352 68,808 84,192 459 111 STREET FUND 1,760,500 1,399,480 1,496,033 264,467 859 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 2 8,160,017 4,288,607 4,896,779 3,263,238 609 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 106,508 98,326 79,797 26,711 759 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXI, PARKS ACQ FUND 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 3 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 211 L.LD. FUND CONTROL 213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 4 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 4 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 4 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 110 126 151 (41) 1379 82,150 65,718 72,787 9,363 899 21,390 9,909 10,231 11,159 489 5,550 907 166 5,384 39 27,530 22,164 24,570 2,960 899 1,108,000 1,176,905 1,121,749 (13,749) 1019 1,102,000 1,174,843 1,124,048 (22,048) 1029 46,900 46,354 35,691 11,209 769 280 269 323 (43) 1159 177,260 153,799 141,379 35,881 809 1,357,240 596,686 1,141,713 215,527 849 630 1,068 1,281 (651) 2039 19,880 20,908 21,060 (1,180) 1069 12,010 3,920 5,793 6,217 489 682,500 585,887 601,316 81,184 889 - 71,450 73,378 (73,378) 09 14,400 28,378 13,084 1,316 919 14,400 - - 14,400 09 677,380 75,464 70,301 607,079 109 949,540 9,201 936,429 13,111 999 - 75,156 141,890 (141,890) 09 8,443,460 12,148,232 7,327,881 1,115,579 879 4,131,780 7,127,287 3,301,572 830,208 809 12,645,240 17,606,513 9,425,156 3,220,084 759 1,989,900 337,211 667,449 1,322,451 349 1,579,570 1,393,014 1,393,366 186,204 889 64,840 57,336 58,416 6,424 909 $ 88,205,721 $ 77,718,742 $ 65,796,673 $ 22,409,048 75° Differences between 2015 and 2016 are due to grant invoicing for Fishing Pier Rehab and mid -year transfer from Fund 001. 2 Difference between 2015 and 2016 is due to grant invoicing for various projects in 2016. 3 Differences between 2015 and 2016 are due to a SnoCo grant, parks donations, and park impact fees 4 Difference between 2015 and 2016 is largely due to 2015 Revenue Bond Proceeds received in August of 2015. 1 .Pack__ .,_ 143 3 rac,ecei Pg. i4� Page 1 of 1 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount No. Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent 001 GENERAL FUND 5 $ 41,244,806 $ 29,998,394 $ 32,924,906 $ 8,319,900 800/( 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 279,480 239,036 220,611 58,869 790/( Ol l RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND - 71,528 - - 00% 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 6 800,000 3,246,447 800,000 00% 013 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND 56,860 - 56,860 00/( 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 5,400 7,500 - 5,400 00/( 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7 2,395,000 155,218 1,992,340 402,660 830/( 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 76,030 46,895 50,104 25,926 660/( Ill STREET FUND 1,716,120 1,389,184 1,469,166 246,954 860/( 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 8,173,112 3,600,502 3,111,547 5,061,565 380/( 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 181,380 81,321 66,100 115,280 360/( 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 149,650 50,226 57,752 91,898 390/( 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 404 1,726 25,154 60/( 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,000 1,787 1,210 1,790 400/( 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 31,500 11,616 18,531 12,969 590/( 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2,100,565 167,101 373,927 1,726,638 180/( 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND s 2,783,637 32,845 554,417 2,229,220 200/( 127 GIFTSCATALOGFUND 44,950 20,742 37,092 7,858 830/( 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 210,370 133,925 134,171 76,199 640/c 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 8 1,580,770 1,195,417 824,499 756,271 520/( 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 12,500 4,987 5,653 6,847 450/( 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 682,500 613,821 601,316 81,184 880/( 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 42,491 45,185 (45,185) 00/( 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 22,000 - - 22,000 00/( 213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND 105,136 - - 105,136 00/( 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 677,380 75,464 70,301 607,079 100/( 232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND 5 949,540 9,201 936,429 13,111 990/( 421 WATER UTILITYFUND 12,717,507 6,772,283 6,888,983 5,828,524 540/( 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 8,103,448 2,490,070 3,130,805 4,972,643 390/( 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 17,972,050 8,426,492 9,385,229 8,586,821 520/( 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,990,920 337,261 667,442 1,323,478 340/( 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,971,820 1,313,521 1,252,400 719,420 640/( 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 59,610 41,574 32,099 27,511 54°/ $ 107,123,921 $ 60,577,254 $ 64,853,942 $ 42,269,979 610% 5 Differences between 2015 and 2016 are primarily due to final payment of 2014 debt. 6 Differences between 2015 and 2016 are due to Interfund Loans to funds 112 and 014 in 2015. 7 Differences between 2015 and 2016 are primarily due to the Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project. 8 Differences between 2015 and 2016 are due to purchase of Civic Field in 2016. 2 Packet Pg. 144 5.4.a Page 1 of 3 C ITY O F EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 9 EMSPROPERTY TAX 10 VOTED PROPERTY TAX LOCAL RETAIL SALES✓USE TAX 11 NATURAL GAS USE TAX 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX GAS UT ILIT Y T AX SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX WATERUTILITY TAX SEWER UTILITY TAX STORMWATER UTILITY TAX T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX PULLTABSTAX AMUSEMENT GAMES LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX LIC INS ES AND PERMITS: FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE POLICE - FINGERPRINTING PROF AND OCC LICENSE -TAXI AMUSEMENTS FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -VERIZON/FRONT IER FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -BLACKROCK OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS ANIMAL LICENSES STREET AND CURB PERMIT OT R NON -BUS LIC/PERMIT S INTERGOVERNMENTAL: DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST ROOFTOP SOLAR CHALLENGE GRANT ROOFTOP SOLAR CHALLENGE II WA ASSOC OF SHERIFFS TRAFFIC GRANT TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT DOCKSIDE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE WA STATE ADMIN OFFICE COURTS GRANT 2014 COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT WATERFRONT ANALYSIS GRANT PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION JUDICIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTION -STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS DUI - CITIES LIQUOR EXCISE TAX LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS MISCELLANEOUS INT ERLOCAL REVENUE 12 INT ERLOCAL GRANTS VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS $ 10,068,020 $ 6,025,102 $ 6,072,050 $ 3,995,970 60% 3,688,090 2,045,951 2,222,247 1,465,843 60% 949,540 558,567 572,820 376,720 60% 6,144,400 5,529,730 5,725,300 419,100 93% 9,800 5,153 4,960 4,840 51% 626,700 525,729 562,893 63,807 90% 1,451,800 1,321,572 1,347,152 104,648 93% 647,900 517,806 487,637 160,263 75% 306,500 246,096 279,577 26,923 91% 1,229,110 956,191 1,025,010 204,100 83% 629,140 476,020 525,386 103,754 84% 330,430 271,550 284,288 46,142 86% 846,000 710,066 715,449 130,551 85% 1,349,100 1,108,655 1,023,923 325,177 76% 60,600 49,393 51,728 8,872 85% 40 - 141 (101) 351% 242,200 187,006 196,447 45,753 81% 28,579,370 20,534,586 21,097,009 7,482,361 74% 250 375 270 (20) 108% 300 470 375 (75) 125% 630 330 - 630 0% 4,740 4,325 - 4,740 0% 710,600 711,199 719,840 (9,240) 101% 44,900 37,544 35,193 9,707 78% 100,900 75,190 76,654 24,246 76% 18,400 16,827 12,275 6,125 67% 268,000 293,783 202,687 65,313 76% 116,000 97,322 87,272 28,729 75% 42,000 41,190 45,590 (3,590) 109% 70,400 37,050 51,650 18,750 73% 15,000 5,388 46,623 (31,623) 311% 525,000 554,271 581,128 (56,128) 111% 38,800 18,197 11,635 27,165 30% 42,100 31,117 40,372 1,728 96% 13,100 11,878 15,527 (2,427) 119% 2,011,120 1,936,455 1,927,090 84,030 96% 11,970 3,018 6,920 5,050 58% 3,750 - - 0% 6,000 5,250 5,250 750 88% - - 992 (992) 0% 7,500 11,634 3,348 4,152 45% 3,000 - 4,675 (1,675) 156% - 492 614 (614) 0% 300 413 - 300 0% - 1,000 - - 0% - - 330,649 (330,649) 0% 192,500 194,479 197,399 (4,899) 103% 10,000 10,675 11,152 (1,152) 112% 13,000 16,423 17,677 (4,677) 136% 36,980 39,113 40,661 (3,681) 110% 7,240 6,052 6,313 927 87% 65,200 108,766 188,912 (123,712) 290% 357,800 262,569 261,672 96,128 73% - 111 77,153 (77,153) 0% 383,330 30,000 - 383,330 0% 2,000 2,120 (2,120) 0% 1,094,820 695,745 1,155,509 (60,689) 106% 2016 Real Personal/Property Tax revenues are $46,949 higher than 2015 revenues. 10 2016 EMS Property Tax revenues are $176,297 higher than 2015 revenues. 19 2016 Local Retail SalesiUse Taxrevenues are $195,571 higher than 2015 revenues. Please also see pages 18 & 19. 12 Difference between 2015 and 2016 revenues is due to funds received for closure of ESCA in 2016. 3 Packet Pg. 145 5.4.a Page 2 of 3 C ITY O F FAMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: MUNICIPAL COURT CIVIC FILINGS $ - $ - $ 25 $ (25) 0% RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMTS 2,000 1,430 1,925 76 96% ATM SURCHARGE FEES 250 444 408 (158) 163% D/M COURT REC SER 50 73 47 3 94% MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURREXPEN 400 342 436 (36) 109% SALE MAPS & BOOKS 100 - 4 96 4% CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKINGPERMITS 25,100 - 25,100 0% BID SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 600 - - 600 0% PHOTOCOPIES 2,000 1,671 839 1,161 42% POLICE DISCLOSURE REOUESTS 4,000 3,399 3,080 921 77% ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 180,350 169,854 187,239 (6,889) 104% ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES - - - 0% SNO-ISLE 58,000 60,986 74,184 (16,184) 128% PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 15,000 15,560 17,334 (2,334) 116% POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 31,852 24,653 31,852 0 100% CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. 12,300 3,782 2,873 9,427 23% WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 43,350 42,290 61,411 (18,061) 142% MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 1,500 - 538 962 36% DUI EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES 300 - 300 0% FIRE PROTECTION & EMS FOR DUI - - 52 (52) 0% FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 45,000 46,928 48,748 (3,748) 108% LEGAL SERVICES - - 177 (177) 0% ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 60,000 53,087 58,661 1,339 98% ELECTRONIC MONITORING - - 100 (100) 0% BOOKING FEES 6,000 5,179 3,304 2,696 55% FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 8,000 19,091 21,376 (13,376) 267% EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 15,000 9,321 6,255 8,745 42% EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 13 822,100 631,009 673,314 148,786 82% FIBER SERVICES 9,200 7,650 9,250 (50) 101% INTERGOVERNMENTAL FIBER SERVICES 7,200 6,000 6,000 1,200 83% FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 1,800 1,752 1,910 (110) 106% ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 6,000 2,226 239 5,762 4% ZONINGGSUBDIVISIONFEE 75,000 90,120 84,730 (9,730) 113% PLAN CHECKING FEES 440,000 418,119 348,015 91,986 79% FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 3,000 9,225 10,035 (7,035) 335% PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 1,250 939 1,784 (534) 143% S.E.P.A. REVIEW 7,000 8,765 3,050 3,950 44% CRITICAL AREA STUDY 15,000 16,275 16,460 (1,460) 110% DV COORDINATOR SERVICES 10,000 7,911 9,266 734 93% GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 7,800 6,929 10,630 (2,830) 136% LOCKER FEES - - 60 (60) 0% PROGRAM FEES 861,700 686,677 785,809 75,891 91% TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 19,130 106,066 964 18,166 5% WINTER MARKET REGISTRATION FEES 5,000 1,600 4,550 450 91% BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 950 1,244 916 34 96% INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS 2,939,600 1,761,691 1,759,176 1,180,424 60% 5,742,882 4,222,289 4,247,022 1,495,860 74% 13 2016 EMS Transport User Fees are $42,305 higher than 2015 revenues. 4 Packet Pg. 146 5.4.a Page 3 of 3 CITY OF EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received FINES AND FORFEITURES: PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 8,000 5,076 5,655 2,345 71% TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 25,000 67,340 182,136 (157,136) 729% NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 260,000 194,109 47,206 212,794 18% CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA) 24,600 20,112 18,090 6,510 74% CURRENT TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS - - 201 (201) 0% NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 1,300 14,180 39,608 (38,308) 3047% OTHERINFRACTIONS'04 1,000 863 1,659 (659) 166% PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 43,000 33,660 26,267 16,733 61% PARK/INDDISZONE 1,300 1,556 3,156 (1,856) 243% DWI PENALTIES 6,000 4,709 17,888 (11,888) 298% DUI - DP ACCT 2,500 2,464 2,021 479 81% CRIM CNV FEE DUI 300 424 407 (107) 136% OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN - - 56 (56) 0% CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 33,000 26,055 27,525 5,475 83% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 1,900 2,097 2,399 (499) 126% CRIM CONV FEE CT 2,300 1,476 1,450 850 63% OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 130 94 - 130 0% OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 9,000 12,937 9,446 (446) 105% COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 900 910 407 494 45% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 1,900 1,371 1,497 403 79% CRIM CONV FEE CN 900 632 503 397 56% CRIMINAL COSTS-RECOUPMENTS 60,000 44,538 21,617 38,383 36% PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 33,000 24,529 20,449 12,551 62% BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT - - 6,010 (6,010) 0% COURT INTERPRETER COSTS 100 271 71 29 71% BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 5,000 12,810 12,985 (7,985) 260% MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 1,000 1,450 1,325 (325) 133% 522,130 473,662 450,032 72,098 86% MISCELLANEOUS: INVESTMENT INTEREST 38,600 27,367 44,208 (5,608) 115% INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 5,700 2,835 4,999 701 88% INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 5,000 4,706 5,437 (437) 109% PARKING 14,000 13,220 13,766 234 98% SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS 128,000 121,805 135,590 (7,590) 106% BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 5,000 3,840 4,560 440 91% LEASESLONGTERM 218,100 145,944 149,345 68,755 68% VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 50,000 49,465 49,304 696 99% OTHER RENT S& USE CHARGES 4,500 3,300 1,800 2,700 40% DONATION/CONTRIBUTION 10,000 - - 10,000 0% PARKS DONATIONS 9,500 14,060 4,350 5,150 46% BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 950 1,950 1,642 (692) 173% 125TH ANNIVERSARY CONTRIBUTIONS - 3,700 - - 0% VOLUNTEERPICNICCONTRIBUTTONS - 500 1,701 (1,701) 0% POLICE CONT RIBUT IONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 1,000 1,200 - 1,000 0% SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 150 - 304 (154) 203% SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 2,000 1,781 6,886 (4,886) 344% CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 2,000 - - 2,000 0% OT HER JUDGEMENT /SET T LEMENT 5,651 83 3,876 1,775 69% POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION 200 30 296 (96) 148% CASHIER'S OVERAGES✓SHORTAGES - (667) 279 (279) 0% OTHER MISC REVENUES 1,000 16,129 12,061 (11,061) 1206% SMALL OVERPAYMENT 50 18 25 25 50% NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 120 30 - 120 0% NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 330 296 173 157 52% FLEX -PLAN SERVICES FORFEITURES 1,010 - - 1,010 0% US BANK REBATE 6,000 5,822 5,637 363 94% 508,861 417,414 446,239 629622 88% TRANSFERS -IN: INSURANCE RECOVERIES 10,927 - 58,451 (47,524) 535% OPERATING TRANSFER -IN 56,860 - - 56,860 0% TRANSFER FROM FUND 012 800,000 400,000 - 800,000 0% TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 25,840 11,088 25,835 5 100% 893,627 4119088 84,286 8099341 9% TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 39,352,810 $ 289691,238 $ 29,407,186 $ 99945,624 75% 5 Packet Pg. 147 I 5.4.a I Page 1 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 13,972,527 $ 10,678,192 $ 11,240,297 $ 2,732,230 80% OVERTIME 434,026 434,346 401,320 32,706 92% HOLIDAY BUY BACK 217,790 3,174 2,349 215,441 1% BENEFITS 5,363,709 3,996,457 4,282,887 1,080,822 80% UNIFORMS 89,290 56,697 72,129 17,161 81% SUPPLIES 412,557 276,092 296,646 115,911 72% SMALL EQUIPMENT 161,680 117,079 104,776 56,904 65% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,711,863 1,846,017 2,551,873 1,159,990 69% COMMUNICATIONS 211,890 139,134 133,302 78,588 63% TRAVEL 46,210 28,893 27,154 19,056 59% EXCISE TAXES 6,500 - 4,227 2,273 65% ADVERTISING - 4,026 - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE 916,390 761,368 773,603 142,787 84% INSURANCE 534,440 418,367 538,732 (4,292) 101% UTILITIES 457,800 383,992 403,121 54,679 88% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 435,760 315,935 273,705 162,055 63% MISCELLANEOUS 400,094 270,410 239,393 160,701 60% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 9,963,210 9,591,215 9,779,954 183,256 98% INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 135,000 - - 135,000 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 3,492,120 526,556 1,739,021 1,753,099 50% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 67,500 57,600 36,690 30,810 54% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 168,300 - - 168,300 0% CAPITAL LEASES AND INSTALLMENT PURCHASES - 65,297 - - 0% OTHER DEBT - 87 273 (273) 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 46,150 27,460 23,454 22,696 51% 1,2 ,806 29,998,394 32,92 ,906 8,319,900 800o LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE(009) BENEFIT S IN HOME LTC CLAIMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAVEL MISCELLANEOUS RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND (011) MISCELLANEOUS CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND (012) INTERFUND LOAN INTERFUND SUBSIDIES MULTTMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND (013) INTERFUND SUBSIDIES HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUBFUND (016) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIRS& MAINTENANENCE MISCELLANEOUS MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS DRUG INFO RCEVIENTFUND (104) FUEL CONSUMED SMALL EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR/MAINT MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES $ 178,720 $ 150,215 $ 137,900 $ 40,820 77% 100,480 81,904 80,208 20,272 80% - 6,643 1,286 (1,286) 0% - - 447 (447) 0% 280 275 770 (490) 275% 279,480 239,036 220,611 58,869 79% $ - $ 71,528 $ - $ - 0% - $ 71,528 - - 0% $ - $ 2,846,447 $ - $ - 0% 800,000 400,000 - 800,000 0% 800,000 s 3,246,447 - 800,000 0% $ 56,860 $ - $ - $ 56,860 0% 56,860 - - 56,860 0% $ 100 $ - $ - $ 100 0% 200 7,500 - 200 0% 5,100 - - 5,100 0% 5,400 7,500 - 5,400 0% $ - $ 11,410 $ 1,756 $ (1,756) 0% 162,459 92,546 330,600 (168,141) 203% 2,062,000 50,956 177,495 1,884,505 9% - - 546 (546) 0% 33,000 307 191,821 (158,821) 581% 137,541 - 1,290,122 (1,152,581) 938% 2,395,000 S 155,218 S 1,992,340 402,660 83% $ 3,000 $ 1,273 $ 1,088 $ 1,912 36% 5,000 800 5,768 (768) 115% 2,230 1,652 1,409 821 63% 800 - - 800 0% 20,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50% 45,000 33,170 31,839 13,161 71% 76,030 46,895 50,104 25,926 66% 6 Packet Pg. 148 I 5.4.a I Page 2 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DEIAIL 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent STREETFUND (111) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 515,160 $ 469,863 $ 516,198 $ (1,038) 100% OVERTIME 18,400 17,046 18,558 (158) 101% BENEFITS 265,870 241,265 261,691 4,179 98% UNIFORMS 6,000 5,002 3,745 2,255 62% SUPPLIES 240,000 131,193 156,939 83,061 65% SMALL EQUIPMENT 26,000 9,462 6,176 19,824 24% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,050 6,649 13,874 176 99% COMMUNICATIONS 3,500 3,297 3,331 169 95% TRAVEL 1,000 300 - 1,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 190,950 159,959 159,559 31,391 84% INSURANCE 87,620 81,386 97,912 (10,292) 112% UTILITIES 270,170 208,897 202,005 68,165 75% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 45,000 40,725 24,620 20,380 55% MISCELLANEOUS 24,250 1,357 2,111 22,139 9% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 3,000 2,031 1,577 1,423 53% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 9,828 - - 0% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 3,420 - - 3,420 0% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERIVCE COSTS - - 4 (4) 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 1 730 925 865 865 50% COMBINED STREETC0NST/IMPROVE(112) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTERFUND SUBSIDIES LAND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST MUNIC IPAL ARTS AC Q UIS. FUND (117) SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRAVEL RENT AL/LEASE REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS INTERFUND SUBSIDIES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS EMPLOYEE PARING PERMIT FUND (121) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) MISCELLANEOUS TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS $ 1,716,120 $ 1,389,184 $ 1,469,166 $ 246,954 86% $ 1,747,910 $ 1,231,592 $ 980,389 $ 767,521 56% 358,240 313,084 40,908 317,332 11% 438,000 96,051 190,064 247,936 43% 5,553,332 1,884,129 1,824,589 3,728,743 33% 72,220 72,201 72,201 19 100% 3,410 3,444 3,396 14 100% $ 8,173,112 $ 3,600,502 $ 3,111,547 $ 5,061,565 38% $ 4,400 $ 3,232 $ 3,608 $ 792 82% 1,500 815 685 815 46% 166,500 74,028 57,504 108,997 35% 80 - 11 70 13% 2,000 - - 2,000 0% 300 140 - 300 0% 6,600 3,106 4,292 2,308 65% $ 181,380 $ 81,321 $ 66,100 $ 115,280 36% $ 77,500 $ 47,645 $ 55,481 $ 22,019 72% 8,150 582 271 7,879 3% 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 50% 60,000 - - 60,000 0% $ 149,650 $ 50,226 $ 57,752 $ 91,898 39% $ 1,790 $ 404 $ 1,726 $ 64 96% 25,090 - - 25,090 0% $ 26,880 $ 404 $ 1,726 $ 25,154 6% $ 3,000 $ 1,787 $ 1,210 $ 1,790 40% $ 3,000 $ 1,787 $ 1,210 $ 1,790 40% $ 28,300 $ 10,343 $ 14,953 $ 13,347 53% 3,200 1,273 3,578 (378) 112% $ 31,500 $ 11,616 $ 18,531 $ 12,969 59% 7 Packet Pg. 149 I 5.4.a I Page 3 of 6 C ITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (125) SUPPLIES $ 21,000 $ 35,347 $ 47,482 $ (26,482) 226% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 186,788 116,332 144,175 42,613 77% RENTAL/LEASE - - 2,790 (2,790) 0% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 140,000 15,423 20,948 119,052 15% MISCELLANEOUS - - 181 (181) 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1,752,777 - 158,352 1,594,425 9% $ 2,100,565 $ 167,101 $ 373,927 $ 1,726,638 18% REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS AC Q (126) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS INTERFUND SUBSIDIES LAND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OTHER DEBT & DEBT SERVICE COSTS INTEREST GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTERFUND SUBSIDIES C IMEIERY MAINTENANC F/IMPRO VEMENT (130) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFIT S UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL RENT AL/LEASE UTILITIES REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (132) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $ 314,560 $ - $ - $ 314,560 0% - 1,200 - - 0% 139,430 18,263 17,213 122,218 12% 692,180 8,000 476,669 215,511 69% 1,607,507 - 55,406 1,552,101 3% 19,890 - - 19,890 0% - - 96 (96) 0% 10,070 5,382 5,033 5,037 50% $ 2,783,637 $ 32,845 $ 554,417 $ 2,229,220 20% $ 13,110 $ 9,240 $ 4,814 $ 8,296 37% 6,000 415 6,443 (443) 107% 25,840 11,088 25,835 5 100% $ 44,950 $ 20,742 $ 37,092 $ 7,858 83% $ 108,410 $ 69,484 $ 69,504 $ 38,906 64% 3,500 2,046 1,435 2,065 41% 44,500 28,847 29,514 14,986 66% 1,000 197 - 1,000 0% 7,000 1,844 2,825 4,175 40% 20,000 11,451 15,725 4,275 79% 4,200 6,684 927 3,273 22% 1,410 1,059 832 578 59% 500 - - 500 0% 11,550 8,320 9,625 1,925 83% 3,800 733 989 2,811 26% 500 - - 500 0% 4,000 3,260 2,794 1,206 70% $ 210,370 $ 133,925 $ 134,171 $ 76,199 64% $ - $ 25 $ - $ - 0% 225,000 133,672 41,773 183,227 19% 500,000 - 475,710 24,291 95% 855,770 1,057,520 307,016 548,754 36% - 4,200 - - 0% $ 1,580,770 $ 1,195,417 $ 824,499 $ 756,271 52% SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) SALARIES AND WAGES $ - $ - $ 45 $ (45) 0% BENEFITS - - 5 (5) 0% SUPPLIES 2,000 59 255 1,745 13% TRAVEL 4,500 3,359 2,515 1,985 56% MISCELLANEOUS 6,000 1,569 2,833 3,167 47% $ 12,500 $ 4,987 $ 5,653 $ 6,847 45% TRANSPO RTATIO N BENEFIT DIS TRIC T (139) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ $ 3,828 $ - $ - 0% INSURANCE 2,500 2,500 2,500 - 100% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 680,000 607,494 598,816 81,184 88% $ 682,500 $ 613,821 $ 601,316 $ 81,184 88% 8 Packet Pg. 150 I 5.4.a I Page 4 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140) SUPPLIES $ - $ 14,842 $ 6,603 $ (6,603) 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 27,283 37,209 (37,209) 0% MISCELLANEOUS - 367 1,373 (1,373) 0% - 42,491 45,185 (45,185) 0% LID FUND CONTROL (211) INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $ 22,000 $ - $ - $ 22,000 0% $ 22,000 $ - $ - $ 22,000 0% LID GUARANTY FUND (213) INTERFUND SUBSIDIES $ 105,136 $ - $ - $ 105,136 0% $ 105,136 $ - $ - $ 105,136 0% 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231) GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND INTEREST OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND (232) GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND INTEREST WATER FUND (421) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFIT S UNIFORMS SUPPLIES WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL EXCISE TAXES RENT AL/LEASE INSURANCE UTILITIES REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES INTERFUND TAXES INTERFUND SUBSIDIES MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS REVENUE BONDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST DEBT ISSUE COSTS OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS $ 536,270 $ - $ - $ 536,270 0% 140,610 75,464 70,301 70,309 50% 500 - - 500 0% $ 677,380 $ 75,464 $ 70,301 $ 607,079 10% $ 933,210 $ - $ 933,208 $ 2 100% 16,330 9,201 3,221 13,109 20% $ 949,540 $ 9,201 $ 936,429 $ 13,111 99% $ 795,220 $ 610,943 $ 647,464 $ 147,756 81% 24,000 13,350 20,913 3,087 87% 372,550 278,814 299,624 72,926 80% 4,000 2,202 2,759 1,241 69% 151,000 106,893 84,619 66,381 56% 1,600,000 1,384,727 1,385,436 214,564 87% 143,000 101,327 71,879 71,121 50% 11,000 9,759 3,971 7,029 36% 1,793,286 853,271 929,715 863,571 52% 30,000 25,091 24,267 5,733 81% 200 - - 200 0% 340,000 304,732 344,526 (4,526) 101% 100,750 79,336 81,606 19,144 81% 58,920 70,904 52,335 6,585 89% 40,000 17,215 17,349 22,651 43% 17,000 20,186 30,767 (13,767) 181% 70,450 54,886 50,885 19,565 72% 30,000 30,693 32,367 (2,367) 108% 1,229,110 956,191 1,025,010 204,100 83% 731,220 121,300 219,326 511,894 30% 15,000 19,261 15,065 (65) 100% 4,551,921 1,434,806 1,393,872 3,158,049 31% 2,300 - - 2,300 0% 323,870 - - 323,870 0% 25,840 45,839 25,839 1 100% 256,870 133,799 129,008 127,862 50% - 96,726 - - 0% - 31 380 (380) 0% $ 12,717,507 $ 6,772,283 $ 6,888,983 $ 5,828,524 54% 9 Packet Pg. 151 I 5.4.a I Page 5 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent S TO RM FUND (422) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 640,470 $ 380,797 $ 412,429 $ 228,041 64% OVERTIME 6,000 12,342 13,213 (7,213) 220% BENEFITS 313,950 189,165 211,214 102,736 67% UNIFORMS 6,500 4,850 5,450 1,050 84% SUPPLIES 46,500 28,014 17,854 28,646 38% SMALL EQUIPMENT 4,000 1,510 1,354 2,646 34% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,729,930 882,307 910,314 1,819,616 33% COMMUNICATIONS 3,200 2,614 2,204 996 69% TRAVEL 4,300 - 300 4,000 7% EXCISE TAXES 55,000 54,053 46,980 8,020 85% RENTAL/LEASE 252,990 177,431 207,081 45,909 82% INSURANCE 64,120 39,269 63,187 933 99% UTILITES 10,500 7,075 7,531 2,969 72% REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 13,000 11,587 14,183 (1,183) 109% MISCELLANEOUS 94,950 51,518 42,671 52,279 45% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 85,000 86,392 133,418 (48,418) 157% INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 330,430 271,550 284,288 46,142 86% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 413,678 25,585 95,380 318,298 23% LAND 25,000 - - 25,000 0% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 9,828 - - 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,563,330 70,500 545,499 2,017,831 21% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 83,800 - - 83,800 0% REVENUE BONDS 158,300 - - 158,300 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 32,070 32,063 32,063 8 100% INTEREST 166,430 87,739 83,932 82,498 50% DEBT ISSUE COSTS - 63,866 - - 0% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 15 263 (263) 0% SEWER FUND (423) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFIT S UNIFORMS SUPPLIES FUEL CONSUMED SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL EXCISE TAXES RENT AL/LEASE INSURANCE UTILITIES REPAIR & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT INTERFUND SUBSIDIES MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS REVENUE BONDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST DEBT ISSUE COSTS OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS BOND RESERVEFUND (424) REVENUE BONDS INTEREST OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS $ 8,103,448 $ 2,490,070 $ 3,130,805 $ 4,972,643 39% $ 1,721,530 $ 1,394,104 $ 1,422,863 $ 298,667 83% 100,000 84,793 74,524 25,476 75% 771,920 614,873 638,324 133,596 83% 9,500 5,794 6,394 3,106 67% 420,200 190,476 216,632 203,568 52% 90,000 49,050 40,910 49,090 45% 4,000 - - 4,000 0% 46,000 18,258 21,728 24,272 47% 2,005,696 1,331,453 1,493,457 512,239 74% 43,000 34,360 32,864 10,136 76% 5,000 - 3,122 1,878 62% 150,000 128,459 153,910 (3,910) 103% 182,670 166,571 148,188 34,482 81% 96,630 140,834 106,915 (10,285) 111% 1,056,660 753,979 1,027,151 29,509 97% 325,000 280,935 220,022 104,978 68% 105,450 54,704 52,011 53,439 49% 150,000 130,022 132,775 17,225 89% 629,140 476,020 525,386 103,754 84% 2,563,949 630,989 1,038,681 1,525,268 41% - 31,629 9,388 (9,388) 0% 6,999,825 1,505,571 1,777,926 5,221,899 25% 130,140 - - 130,140 0% 72,840 - - 72,840 0% 170,620 169,990 170,603 17 100% 122,280 68,751 65,128 57,152 53% - 158,765 - - 0% - 6,114 6,327 (6,327) 0% $ 17,972,050 $ 8,426,492 $ 9,385,229 $ 8,586,821 52% $ 655,010 $ - $ - $ 655,010 0% 1,334,910 337,208 667,442 667,468 50% 1,000 54 - 1,000 0% $ 1,990,920 $ 337,261 $ 667,442 $ 1,323,478 34% 10 Packet Pg. 152 I 5.4.a I Page 6 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent EQ UIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 224,880 $ 175,720 $ 185,564 $ 39,316 83% OVERTIME 2,000 949 46 1,954 2% BENEFITS 105,050 80,771 81,199 23,851 77% UNIFORMS 1,000 1,118 865 135 87% SUPPLIES 110,000 78,742 63,495 46,505 58% FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 106 - 1,000 0% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 308,200 125,775 123,088 185,112 40% SMALL EQUIPMENT 58,000 21,411 10,179 47,821 18% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 44,000 1,092 1,127 42,873 3% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,809 1,975 1,025 66% TRAVEL 1,000 2,935 1,000 - 100% RENTAL/LEASE 19,440 12,359 15,999 3,441 82% INSURANCE 29,560 40,605 29,967 (407) 101% UTILITIES 14,000 9,041 9,204 4,796 66% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 60,000 29,841 38,313 21,687 64% MISCELLANEOUS 7,190 6,411 7,134 56 99% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,500 1,195 1,436 1,064 57% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 981,000 723,639 681,808 299,192 70% $ 1,971,820 $ 1,313,521 $ 1,252,400 $ 719,420 64% FIRIIVIEN'S PENSION FUND (617) BENEFITS $ 30,940 $ 18,608 $ 14,113 $ 16,827 46% PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 27,470 21,859 17,772 9,698 65% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,200 1,107 214 986 18% $ 59,610 $ 41,574 $ 32,099 $ 27,511 54% TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS S 107,123,921 $ 60,577,254 $ 64,853,942 $ 42,269,979 61 % 11 Packet Pg. 153 5.4.a Page 1 of 1 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL $ 295,500 $ 179,125 $ 191,442 $ 104,058 650/c OFFICE OF MAYOR 260,250 208,188 213,048 47,202 820/c HUMAN RESOURCES 462,044 295,874 291,175 170,869 630/c MUNICIPAL COURT 909,270 711,635 730,805 178,465 800/c CITY CLERK 589,290 471,900 461,588 127,702 780/c ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1,848,860 1,311,053 1,261,847 587,013 680/c CITYATTORNEY 741,560 552,021 606,406 135,154 820/c NON -DEPARTMENTAL 15,132,298 10,998,910 12,515,126 2,617,172 830/c POLICE SERVICES 9,675,414 7,257,133 7,636,411 2,039,003 790/c COMMUNITY SERVICES✓ECONOMIC DEV. 540,580 341,167 399,626 140,954 740/c DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2,703,352 1,790,912 2,016,828 686,524 750/c PARKS& RECREATION 3,785,468 2,920,692 3,056,852 728,616 81O/C PUBLIC WORKS 2,817,120 1,748,657 2,358,350 458,770 840/c FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,483,800 1,211,126 1,185,401 298,399 800/c $ 41,244,806 $ 29,998,394 $ 32,924,906 $ 8,319,900 800/c C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY Title 2016 Amended Budget 10/31/2015 Expenditures 10/31/2016 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent WATER UTILITY FUND $ 12,717,507 $ 6,772,283 $ 6,888,983 $ 5,828,524 540/ STORM UTILITY FUND 8,103,448 2,490,070 3,130,805 4,972,643 390/ SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 17,972,050 8,426,492 9,385,229 8,586,821 520/ BOND RESERVE FUND 1,990,920 337,261 667,442 1,323,478 340/ $ 40,783,925 $ 18,026,106 $ 20,072,460 $ 20,711,466 490/c 12 Packet Pg. 154 Page 1 of 4 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Title 2016 Amended Budget 10/31/2015 Expenditures 10/31/2016 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent C ITY C O UNC IL SALARIES $ 119,100 $ 104,059 $ 102,487 $ 16,613 86% OVERTIME 1,000 - 140 861 14% BENEFITS 88,550 62,960 75,900 12,650 86% SUPPLIES 2,000 1,145 1,629 371 81% SMALL EQUIPMENT - 832 2,980 (2,980) 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 47,160 5,481 1,432 45,728 3% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 2,701 2,711 289 90% TRAVEL 6,700 933 1,572 5,128 23% RENTAL/LEASE 490 484 278 212 57% REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 500 - 15 485 3% MISCELLANEOUS 27,000 531 2,298 24,702 9% $ 295,500 $ 179,125 $ 191,442 $ 104,058 65% O FFIC E O F MAYO R SALARIES $ 197,160 $ 164,434 $ 164,568 $ 32,592 83% BENEFITS 48,190 37,944 40,067 8,123 83% SUPPLIES 1,500 641 837 663 56% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,000 908 1,191 809 60% COMMUNICATION 1,400 360 1,048 352 75% TRAVEL 3,000 188 538 2,462 18% RENTAL/LEASE 2,400 1,788 1,273 1,127 53% MISCELLANEOUS 4,600 1,925 3,526 1,074 77% $ 260,250 $ 208,188 $ 213,048 $ 47,202 82% HUMAN RES O URC ES SALARIES $ 226,880 $ 174,437 $ 180,346 $ 46,534 79% OVERTIME - - 43 (43) 0% BENEFITS 73,380 57,798 62,283 11,097 85% SUPPLIES 2,300 1,521 2,850 (550) 124% SMALL EQUIPMENT 300 107 - 300 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 114,000 54,924 34,290 79,710 30% COMMUNICATIONS 700 859 892 (192) 127% TRAVEL 1,000 757 527 473 53% RENTAL/LEASE 2,200 1,646 2,012 188 91% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 7,850 7,793 - 7,850 0% MISCELLANEOUS 33,434 (3,968) 7,933 25,501 24% $ 462,044 $ 295,874 $ 291,175 $ 170,869 63% MUNIC IPAL C O URT SALARIES $ 566,190 $ 454,774 $ 469,904 $ 96,286 83% OVERTIME 600 2,301 1,973 (1,373) 329% BENEFITS 222,750 160,682 169,934 52,816 76% SUPPLIES 9,930 10,676 6,054 3,876 61% SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,800 1,631 320 2,480 11% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 64,000 63,084 63,256 744 99% COMMUNICATIONS 1,800 1,714 2,065 (265) 115% TRAVEL 2,500 2,971 2,735 (235) 109% RENTAL/LEASE 800 304 604 196 76% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,700 941 1,011 689 59% MISCELLANEOUS 36,200 12,557 12,948 23,252 36% $ 909,270 $ 711,635 $ 730,805 $ 178,465 80% 13 Packet Pg. 155 I 5.4.a I Page 2 of 4 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent CITY CLERK SALARIES AND WAGES $ 324,480 $ 277,304 $ 277,339 $ 47,141 85% OVERTIME - 1,397 1,509 (1,509) 0% BENEFITS 129,300 100,430 108,377 20,923 84% SUPPLIES 10,240 6,577 4,914 5,326 48% SMALL EQUIPMENT - 602 1,416 (1,416) 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,310 22,039 21,874 6,436 77% COMMUNICATIONS 50,000 32,533 10,979 39,021 22% TRAVEL 1,000 423 - 1,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 20,000 17,322 13,467 6,533 67% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 21,960 9,796 16,234 5,726 74% MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 3,477 5,480 (1,480) 137% $ 589,290 $ 471,900 $ 461,588 $ 127,702 78% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SALARIES $ 887,390 $ 658,996 $ 716,926 $ 170,464 81% OVERTIME 6,670 1,408 1,810 4,860 27% BENEFITS 305,800 222,044 239,576 66,224 78% SUPPLIES 50,730 7,971 11,038 39,692 22% SMALL EQUIPMENT 110,650 62,512 53,478 57,172 48% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 111,400 58,365 29,879 81,521 27% COMMUNICATIONS 61,500 39,128 44,443 17,057 72% TRAVEL 2,900 1,722 833 2,067 29% RENTAL/LEASE 8,200 8,850 9,838 (1,638) 120% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 248,930 158,643 137.064 111,866 55% MISCELLANEOUS 14,690 47,177 7,720 6,970 53% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 40,000 44,236 9,242 30,758 23% $ 1,848,860 $ 1,311,053 $ 1,261,847 $ 587,013 68% CITY ATTORNEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 741,560 $ 552,021 $ 604,270 $ 137,290 81% MISCELLANEOUS 2,137 (2,137) 0% $ 741,560 $ 552,021 $ 606,406 $ 135,154 82% NON-DEPARTNIIIVTAL SALARIES $ 67,338 $ - $ - $ 67,338 0% BENEFITS -UNEMPLOYMENT 34,500 5,981 3,090 31,410 9% SUPPLIES 3,000 6,097 1,879 1,121 63% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 690,380 337,344 401,880 288,500 58% EXCISE TAXES 6,500 4,026 4,227 2,273 65% RENTAL/LEASE 3,600 3,600 3,600 - 100% INSURANCE 534,440 418,367 538,732 (4,292) 101% MISCELLANEOUS 69,010 62,426 67,602 1,408 98% INTERGOVT SERVICES 9,881,960 9,541,670 9,731,367 150,593 98% ECA LOAN PAYMENT 135,000 - - 135,000 0% INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 3,492,120 526,556 1,739,021 1,753,099 50% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 168,300 - - 168,300 0% INSTALLMENT PURCHASES - 65,297 - - 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 46,150 27,460 23,454 22,696 51% FISCAL AGENT FEES - 87 273 (273) 0% $ 15,132,298 $ 10,998,910 $ 12,515,126 $ 2,617,172 83% 14 Packet Pg. 156 I 5.4.a I Page 3 of 4 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent PO LIC E S ERVIC IS SALARIES $ 5,802,929 $ 4,366,576 $ 4,655,475 $ 1,147,454 80% OVERTIME 406,756 415,255 367,387 39,369 90% HOLIDAY BUYBACK 217,790 3,174 2,349 215,441 1% BENEFITS 2,228,189 1,694,205 1,816,555 411,634 82% UNIFORMS 80,310 47,973 63,245 17,065 79% SUPPLIES 86,730 62,324 67,231 19,499 78% SMALL EQUIPMENT 24,900 19,736 28,958 (4,058) 116% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 117,170 84,808 68,902 48,268 59% COMMUNICATIONS 26,210 19,668 24,650 1,560 94% TRAVEL 17,310 17,592 12,522 4,788 72% RENTAL/LEASE 595,100 477,395 492,067 103,033 83% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 14,620 10,763 8,826 5,794 60% MISCELLANEOUS 46,850 27,119 22,970 23,880 49% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 10,550 10,546 5,274 5,276 50% $ 9,675,414 $ 7,257333 $ 7,636,411 $ 2,039M3 79% COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV. SALARIES $ 224,960 $ 184,398 $ 188,314 $ 36,646 84% BENEFITS 67,430 53,571 56,760 10,670 84% SUPPLIES 7,000 2,763 5,965 1,035 85% SMALL EQUIPMENT 800 326 125 676 16% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 227,400 92,370 143,676 83,724 63% COMMUNICATIONS 1,490 821 881 609 59% TRAVEL 2,000 179 - 2,000 0% RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 1,646 1,402 598 70% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 7,000 5,092 2,503 4,497 36% $ 540,580 $ 341,167 $ 399,626 $ 140,954 74% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING SALARIES $ 1,444,230 $ 1,119,836 $ 1,188,760 $ 255,470 82% OVERTIME 1,300 528 6,202 (4,902) 477% BENEFITS 534,670 400,026 435,921 98,749 82% UNIFORMS 500 - 100 400 20% SUPPLIES 16,100 11,251 12,473 3,627 77% SMALL EQUIPMENT 6,950 6,474 5,089 1,861 73% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 588,942 162,242 270,720 318,222 46% COMMUNICATIONS 8,500 3,677 5,207 3,293 61% TRAVEL 4,250 2,397 5,843 (1,593) 137% RENTAL/LEASE 24,750 30,698 18,188 6,562 73% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 6,800 6,612 8,973 (2,173) 132% MISCELLANEOUS 38,860 47,170 31,905 6,955 82% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 27,500 - 27,449 51 100% $ 2,703,352 $ 1,790,912 $ 2,016,828 $ 686,524 75% ENGINEERING SALARIES $ 1,348,500 $ 1,029,447 $ 1,074,073 $ 274,427 80% OVERTIME 5,000 946 3,567 1,433 71% BENEFITS 561,900 407,650 427,484 134,416 76% UNIFORMS 360 - 926 (566) 257% SUPPLIES - 20 79 (79) 0% SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,200 644 1,952 248 89% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 465,000 - 506,726 (41,726) 109% COMMUNICATIONS 11,800 6,705 8,893 2,907 75% TRAVEL 600 21 677 (77) 113% RENTAL/LEASE 26,370 12,400 19,700 6,670 75% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 2,600 - - 2,600 0% MISCELLANEOUS 21,000 8,843 16,820 4,180 80% $ 2,445,330 $ 1,466,676 $ 2,060,898 $ 384,432 84% 15 Packet Pg. 157 I 5.4.a I Page 4 of 4 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2016 Amended 10/31/2015 10/31/2016 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining % Spent PARKS & REC REATIO N SALARIES $ 1,830,090 $ 1,425,063 $ 1,463,885 $ 366,205 80% OVERTIME 10,000 8,999 13,959 (3,959) 140% BENEFITS 695,310 521,535 555,469 139,841 80% UNIFORMS 5,370 5,740 4,697 673 87% SUPPLIES 128,427 102,758 117,287 11,140 91% SMALL EQUIPMENT 9,080 9,205 8,719 361 96% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 514,341 361,002 400,249 114,092 78% COMMUNICATIONS 30,140 18,987 18,055 12,085 60% TRAVEL 4,450 1,709 1,895 2,555 43% RENTAL/LEASE 170,310 156,176 161,792 8,518 95% PUBLICUTILITY 175,000 166,906 184,094 (9,094) 105% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 50,800 37,710 32,875 17,925 65% MISCELLANEOUS 91,450 52,538 50,565 40,885 55% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT - 13,364 - - 0% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 70,700 39,000 43,312 27,388 61% $ 3,785,468 $ 2,920,692 $ 3,056,852 $ 728,616 81% PUBLIC WORKS SALARIES $ 263,850 $ 205,682 $ 218,190 $ 45,660 83% OVERTIME 200 - - 200 0% BENEFITS 81,750 60,460 68,133 13,617 83% SUPPLIES 7,600 3,656 3,181 4,419 42% SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 1,479 108 892 11% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 2,083 70 130 35% COMMUNICATIONS 1,350 500 550 800 41% TRAVEL 500 - - 500 0% RENTAL/LEASE 7,640 4,921 5,046 2,595 66% PUBLICUTILITY 2,800 1,862 1,982 818 71% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,000 - - 1,000 0% MISCELLANEOUS 3,900 1,338 195 3,705 5% $ 371,790 $ 281,981 $ 297,453 $ 74,337 80% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SALARIES 669,430 513,185 540,029 129,401 81% OVERTIME 2,500 3,512 4,731 (2,231) 189% BENEFITS 291,990 211,172 223,337 68,653 76% UNIFORMS 2,750 2,984 3,161 (411) 115% SUPPLIES 87,000 58,692 61,230 25,770 70% SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,000 13,530 1,631 1,369 54% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 49,344 3,459 (3,459) 0% COMMUNICATIONS 14,000 11,483 12,928 1,072 92% TRAVEL - - 12 (12) 0% RENTAL/LEASE 52,530 44,138 44,339 8,191 84% PUBLICUTILITY 280,000 215,225 217,045 62,955 78% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 78,500 83,678 68,708 9,792 88% MISCELLANEOUS 2,100 4,185 4,791 (2,691) 228% $ L483,800 $ 1,211,126 $ 1,185,401 $ 298399 80% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 41,244,806 $ 29,998,394 $ 32,924,906 $ 8,319,900 80% 16 Packet Pg. 158 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund 2016 General Fund Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 1,920,159 $ 1,920,159 $ 2,112,632 10.02% February 4,637,983 2,717,824 4,307,339 -7.13% March 6,898,967 2,260,984 6,797,209 -1.47% April 10,562,881 3,663,914 10,797,010 2.22% May 18,463,894 7,901,013 18,037,636 -2.31% June 20,442,967 1,979,073 20,334,355 -0.53% July 22,565,791 2,122,823 22,256,068 -1.37% August 24,755,920 2,190,130 24,759,102 0.01% September 26,763,728 2,007,808 26,733,249 -0.11% October 29,987,100 3,223,372 29,407,186 -1.93% November 37,333,374 7,346,274 December 39,352,810 2,019,436 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax 2016 Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 189,874 $ 189,874 $ 216,395 13.97% February 316,058 126,183 447,070 41.45% March 479,194 163,136 551,728 15.14% April 640,872 161,679 768,326 19.89% May 800,918 160,046 977,560 22.05% June 986,094 185,176 1,234,188 25.16% July 1,276,157 290,062 1,436,215 12.54% August 1,480,830 204,673 1,708,460 15.37% September 1,690,614 209,784 1,974,089 16.77% October 1,875,616 185,002 2,208,049 17.72% November 2,069,074 193,458 December 2,200,000 130,926 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 17 Packet Pg. 159 1 5.4.a Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: October 2016 Year -to -Date Total $5,725,300 Wholesale Trade 233,334 Contractors 949,376 Health & Personal Carer 84,624 I Retail Eating & Drinking 729,863 Gasoline Stations 28,061 Automotive Repair 143,299 Retail Automotive 1,464,771 Com nnications 210,301 Clothing and Accessories 179,208 Change in Sales Tax Revenue: October 2016 compared to October 2015 Total Retail Automotive Retail Eating & Drinking Misc Retail Trade Business Services Others Retail Food Stores Clothing and Accessories Amusement & Recreation Health & Personal Care Accommodation Wholesale Trade Gasoline Stations Automotive Repair Communications Contractors ($225,000) ($175,000) ($125,000) ($75,000) ($25,000) Misc Retail Trade 660,328 Accommodation 39,792 Business Services 404,720 Amusement & Recreation 59,041 Retail Food Stores 222,172 Others 316,410 $25,000 $75,000 $125,000 $175,000 $225,000 18 Packet Pg. 160 1 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax 2016 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 471,315 $ 471,315 $ 539,867 14.54% February 1,055,135 583,820 1,204,754 14.18% March 1,506,759 451,624 1,693,551 12.40% April 1,936,463 429,704 2,173,926 12.26% May 2,478,856 542,394 2,754,132 11.10% June 2,960,731 481,875 3,295,015 11.29% July 3,457,813 497,082 3,843,359 11.15% August 3,998,806 540,993 4,487,881 12.23% September 4,517,576 518,770 5,077,167 12.39% October 5,055,818 538,242 5,725,300 13.24% November 5,626,862 571,044 December 6,144,400 517,538 Sales and Use Tax 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget mar Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax 2016 Gas Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 90,678 $ 90,678 $ 85,977 -5.18% February 190,868 100,190 176,574 -7.49% March 272,706 81,838 249,556 -8.49% April 346,987 74,281 311,852 -10.13% May 405,847 58,860 352,987 -13.02% June 445,893 40,046 385,669 -13.51% July 477,342 31,449 415,562 -12.94% August 501,633 24,291 440,093 -12.27% September 523,862 22,229 462,329 -11.75% October 548,406 24,545 487,637 -11.08% November 586,112 37,705 December 647,900 61,788 Gas Utility Tax 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year -Budget -0-- Prior Yeaz *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 19 Packet Pg. 161 1 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax 2016 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast TrD Actuals Variance % January $ 125,356 $ 125,356 $ 91,384 -27.10% February 226,461 101,105 230,098 1.61% March 344,917 118,456 328,246 -4.83% April 457,974 113,057 432,105 -5.65% May 577,752 119,778 532,012 -7.92% June 685,900 108,148 633,125 -7.69% July 794,692 108,792 732,953 -7.77% August 904,737 110,045 829,228 -8.35% September 1,019,063 114,326 926,754 -9.06% October 1,131,491 112,428 1,023,923 -9.51% November 1,235,975 104,484 December 1,349,100 113,125 Telephone Utility Tax 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget --dr- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax 2016 1lectric Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly TrD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 155,396 $ 155,396 $ 177,383 14.15% February 311,244 155,848 348,280 11.90% March 463,906 152,662 509,702 9.87% April 612,759 148,854 674,873 10.14% May 749,676 136,917 801,429 6.90% June 854,497 104,821 913,790 6.94% July 956,312 101,815 1,025,239 7.21% August 1,049,934 93,622 1,131,516 7.77% September 1,145,581 95,647 1,238,582 8.12% October 1,239,871 94,290 1,347,152 8.65% November 1,346,584 106,712 December 1,451,800 105,216 Electric Utility Tax 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year -Budget --O-Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 20 Packet Pg. 162 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales 2016 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 573,717 $ 573,717 $ 553,882 -3.46% February 969,279 395,562 943,114 -2.70% March 1,534,923 565,644 1,529,160 -0.38% April 1,915,226 380,303 1,904,819 -0.54% May 2,481,868 566,642 2,446,538 -1.42% June 2,912,390 430,522 2,888,880 -0.81% July 3,586,469 674,079 3,581,142 -0.15% August 4,157,711 571,242 4,155,904 -0.04% September 4,946,125 788,414 4,932,273 -0,28% October 5,503,014 556,889 5,481,021 -0.40% November 6,162,012 658,998 December 6,572,750 410,738 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales 2016 Storm Water Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 238,091 $ 238,091 $ 238,442 14.15% February 750,139 512,049 750,909 11.90% March 988,469 238,330 988,089 9.87% April 1,200,403 211,933 1,195,226 10.14% May 1,439,120 238,718 1,432,240 6.90% June 1,651,173 212,053 1,642,773 6.94% July 1,891,010 239,837 1,880,842 -0.54% August 2,403,804 512,795 2,395,020 -0.37% September 2,641,727 237,923 2,632,203 -0.36% October 2,853,622 211,895 2,842,595 -0.39% November 3,092,120 238,497 December 3,304,340 212,220 Storm Water Sales 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget —dr,- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 21 Packet Pg. 163 1 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2016 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 571,975 $ 571,975 $ 566,825 -0.90% February 1,033,695 461,721 1,035,133 0.14% March 1,603,598 569,903 1,607,616 0.25% April 2,066,627 463,029 2,078,557 0.58% May 2,641,462 574,835 2,642,003 0.02% June 3,110,919 469,457 3,115,575 0.15% July 3,697,613 586,694 3,712,853 0.41% August 4,168,968 471,356 4,182,788 0.33% September 4,762,598 593,630 4,778,740 0.34% October 5,236,709 474,111 5,254,663 0.34% November 5,819,454 582,746 December 6,291,410 471,956 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 22 Packet Pg. 164 1 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund 2016 General Fund Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 4,575,082 $ 4,575,082 $ 4,953,956 8.28% February 7,105,335 2,530,252 7,893,221 11.09% March 10,286,131 3,180,796 10,217,655 -0.67% April 14,324,819 4,038,687 14,305,106 -0.14% May 16,520,210 2,195,391 16,509,045 -0.07% June 20,320,753 3,800,544 19,669,418 -3.21% July 23,583,572 3,262,819 23,796,385 0.90% August 27,203,711 3,620,139 28,202,529 3.67% September 30,837,174 3,633,462 30,670,999 -0.54% October 33,451,691 2,614,517 32,924,906 -1.57% November 37,079,537 3,627,846 December 41,244,806 4,165,269 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental 2016 Non -Departmental Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 2,671,198 $ 2,671,198 $ 3,074,199 15.09% February 3,130,648 459,450 4,065,136 29.85% March 4,231,550 1,100,902 4,389,675 3.74% April 6,194,840 1,963,290 6,454,134 4.19% May 6,357,779 162,939 6,679,708 5.06% June 8,019,411 1,661,631 7,828,525 -2.38% July 9,099,130 1,079,719 9,839,305 8.13% August 10,412,778 1,313,648 11,927,542 14.55% September 11,956,674 1,543,895 12,314,850 3.00% October 12,393,440 436,767 12,515,126 0.98% November 13,569,769 1,176,329 December 15,132,298 1,562,529 Non -Departmental 16,000,000 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year -Budget —dm- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 23 Packet Pg. 165 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council 2016 City Council Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 19,588 $ 19,588 $ 13,340 -31.90% February 43,238 23,650 27,668 -36.01% March 68,617 25,379 44,120 -35.70% April 91,002 22,385 58,113 -36.14% May 115,388 24,386 71,981 -37.62% June 142,957 27,568 98,095 -31.38% July 169,613 26,656 120,390 -29.02% August 194,018 24,404 143,459 -26.06% September 218,163 24,145 183,494 -15,89% October 242,646 24,484 191,442 -21.10% November 268,263 25,616 December 295,500 27,237 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor 2016 Office of Mayor Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 22,161 $ 22,161 $ 21,296 -3.90% February 44,020 21,859 43,294 -1.65% March 65,603 21,583 64,319 -1.96% April 86,693 21,090 85,409 -1.48% May 108,016 21,323 106,249 -1.64% June 129,368 21,352 127,277 -1.62% July 151,400 22,032 148,207 -2.11% August 172,781 21,380 171,288 -0.86% September 193,702 20,921 192,059 -0.85% October 217,172 23,470 213,048 -1.90% November 239,237 22,065 December 260,250 21,013 Office of Mayor 300,000.00 250,000.00 200,000.00 150,000.00 100,000.00 00 50,000.00 0.00 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget -dr,- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 24 Packet Pg. 166 1 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development 2016 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 31,331 $ 31,331 $ 25,054 -20.04% February 72,877 41,546 61,145 -16.10% March 113,765 40,888 101,724 -10.58% April 170,111 56,347 146,484 -13.89% May 211,474 41,362 183,771 -13.10% June 249,424 37,951 232,729 -6.69% July 295,430 46,006 274,304 -7.15% August 339,029 43,599 325,051 -4.12% September 386,859 47,830 362,099 -6.40% October 433,930 47,072 399,626 -7.91% November 479,977 46,047 December 540,580 60,603 City Clerk Community Services/Economic Development 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget -dp- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Clerk 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 50,833 $ 50,833 $ 44,524 -12.41% February 96,778 45,946 87,838 -9.24% March 146,191 49,413 142,107 -2.79% April 191,236 45,044 188,255 -1.56% May 235,619 44,383 234,593 -0.44% June 283,490 47,872 281,026 -0.87% July 331,509 48,019 323,638 -2.37% August 381,757 50,248 371,081 -2.80% September 431,132 49,374 416,998 -3.28% October 489,238 58,106 461,588 -5.65% November 538,959 49,721 December 589,290 50,331 City Clerk 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget -dr- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 25 Packet Pg. 167 1 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources 2016 Human Resources Cumulative Budget Forecast Monthly Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 34,273 $ 34,273 $ 28,007 -18.28% February 71,193 36,920 58,708 -17.54% March 115,298 44,105 90,412 -21.58% April 150,430 35,132 115,675 -23.10% May 189,556 39,126 146,734 -22.59% June 227,772 38,216 175,479 -22.96% July 266,108 38,336 206,637 -22.35% August 302,589 36,480 235,942 -22.03% September 344,265 41,676 265,413 -22.90% October 381,533 37,268 291,175 -23.68% November 414,723 33,190 December 462,044 47,321 Human Resources 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget t Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court 2016 Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 67,768 $ 67,768 $ 67,346 -0.62% February 140,999 73,231 145,300 3.05% March 219,268 78,269 219,191 -0.04% April 293,243 73,975 290,918 -0.79% May 365,511 72,268 366,411 0.25% June 440,872 75,361 435,326 -1.26% July 515,865 74,993 503,006 -2.49% August 594,541 78,676 577,433 -2.88% September 669,574 75,033 654,546 -2.24% October 750,559 80,985 730,805 -2.63% November 828,307 77,748 December 909,270 80,963 Municipal Court 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget -0-- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 26 Packet Pg. 168 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Information Services 2016 Information Services Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 87,929 $ 87,929 $ 55,507 -36.87% February 165,241 77,312 158,620 -4.01% March 227,026 61,786 205,381 -9.53% April 284,411 57,384 242,036 -14.90% May 335,037 50,626 283,871 -15.27% June 385,255 50,218 325,732 -15.45% July 452,964 67,709 370,139 -18.29% August 526,861 73,897 421,240 -20.05% September 596,668 69,807 466,969 -21.74% October 654,598 57,929 536,200 -18.09% November 742,775 88,177 December 909,040 166,265 Finance Information Services 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget t Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Finance 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 97,947 $ 97,947 $ 62,994 -35.69% February 174,402 76,455 130,335 -25.27% March 249,528 75,126 197,850 -20.71% April 330,097 80,569 265,012 -19.72% May 403,825 73,728 330,595 -18.13% June 478,183 74,359 391,632 -18.10% July 551,010 72,826 459,737 -16.56% August 624,240 73,230 535,500 -14.22% September 699,491 75,251 649,770 -7.11% October 782,345 82,854 725,646 -7.25% November 857,044 74,699 December 939,820 82,776 Finance 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget -dm- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 27 Packet Pg. 169 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney 2016 City Attorney Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 61,797 $ 61,797 $ 60,070 -2.79% February 123,593 61,797 120,220 -2.73% March 185,390 61,797 162,968 -12.09% April 247,187 61,797 224,651 -9.12% May 308,983 61,797 286,857 -7.16% June 370,780 61,797 347,078 -6.39% July 432,576 61,797 425,065 -1.74% August 494,373 61,797 467,705 -5.39% September 556,170 61,797 527,900 -5.08% October 617,966 61,797 606,406 -1.87% November 679,763 61,797 December 741,560 61,797 Police 800,000 City Attorney 700,000 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget --AP- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Police 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 746,052 $ 746,052 $ 771,955 3.47% February 1,508,131 762,079 1,527,193 1.26% March 2,281,616 773,484 2,295,467 0.61% April 3,039,356 757,740 3,078,848 1.30% May 3,796,864 757,508 3,832,659 0.94% June 4,618,545 821,680 4,596,670 -0.47% July 5,387,395 768,850 5,342,881 -0.83% August 6,163,917 776,522 6,111,444 -0.85% September 6,932,670 768,753 6,866,786 -0.95% October 7,732,559 799,889 7,636,411 -1.24% November 8,807,522 1,074,963 December 9,675,414 867,892 Police 10,000,000 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Year Budget -dr,- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 28 Packet Pg. 170 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services 2016 Development Services Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 205,383 $ 205,383 $ 170,060 -17.20% February 418,243 212,861 361,353 -13.60% March 652,268 234,024 565,548 -13.30% April 864,610 212,342 764,404 -11.59% May 1,083,969 219,359 985,455 -9.09% June 1,293,357 209,388 1,183,128 -8.52% July 1,517,185 223,828 1,381,541 -8.94% August 1,744,832 227,646 1,616,477 -7.36% September 1,970,309 225,477 1,811,147 -8,08% October 2,220,519 250,210 2,016,828 -9.17% November 2,449,661 229,142 December 2,703,352 253,691 Parks & Recreation Development Services 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget t Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 244,297 $ 244,297 $ 252,899 3.52% February 506,849 262,552 502,972 -0.76% March 783,356 276,507 770,996 -1.58% April 1,061,970 278,614 1,041,241 -1.95% May 1,363,517 301,548 1,333,112 -2.23% June 1,682,088 318,570 1,609,632 -4.31% July 2,114,482 432,394 2,007,609 -5.05% August 2,574,718 460,236 2,491,385 -3.24% September 2,897,470 322,752 2,779,501 -4.07% October 3,192,463 294,993 3,056,852 -4.25% November 3,447,976 255,513 December 3,785,468 337,492 Parks & Recreation 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC t Current Yeaz Budget -dm- Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 29 Packet Pg. 171 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Public Works 2016 Public Works Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 31,230 $ 31,230 $ 29,570 -5.31% February 62,130 30,900 59,034 -4.98% March 92,810 30,680 89,046 -4.05% April 123,243 30,434 118,682 -3.70% May 154,320 31,076 148,411 -3.83% June 185,380 31,060 178,420 -3.75% July 216,622 31,243 208,906 -3.56% August 246,986 30,363 238,996 -3.24% September 276,279 29,293 269,015 -2.63% October 308,266 31,987 297,453 -3.51% November 337,169 28,904 December 371,790 34,621 Facilities Maintenance Public Works 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget --AP- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance 2016 Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance % January $ 115,588 $ 115,588 $ 116,661 0.93% February 236,621 121,033 240,595 1.68% March 365,554 128,934 357,601 -2.18% April 487,500 121,946 468,138 -3.97% May 604,005 116,504 595,677 -1.38% June 723,757 119,752 697,556 -3.62% July 857,071 133,314 822,642 -4.02% August 967,719 110,648 939,588 -2.91% September 1,099,287 131,567 1,067,573 -2.88% October 1,211,418 112,132 1,185,401 -2.15% November 1,335,849 124,431 December 1,483,800 147,951 Facilities Maintenance 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --#- Current Year -Budget --O-Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 30 Packet Pg. 172 1 I 5.4.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering 2016 Engineering Cumulative Monthly Budget Forecast Budget Forecast YTD Actuals Variance January $ 196,050 $ 196,050 $ 160,475 -18.15% February 392,411 196,361 303,810 -22.58% March 591,237 198,826 521,251 -11.84% April 788,103 196,866 763,107 -3.17% May 990,873 202,770 922,959 -6.85% June 1,189,800 198,927 1,161,113 -2.41% July 1,387,485 197,685 1,362,376 -1.81% August 1,587,383 199,898 1,628,399 2.58% September 1,789,654 202,271 1,842,877 2.97% October 2,002,992 213,338 2,060,898 2.89% November 2,209,716 206,724 December 2,445,330 235,614 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 31 Packet Pg. 173 I 5.4.a I INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Summary As of October 31, 2016 Years to Purchase Maturity Yield to Agency / Issuer Investment Type Maturity Price Date Maturity WA State Investment Pool Investment Pool $ 9,786,116 Various 0.47% Snohomish County Investment Pool $ 30,613,606 Various a 0.85/0 Investment Fool j FICO Bonds 0.6 1,027,000 6/6/2017 0.96% FHLMC Bonds 1.2 1,000,000 12/28/2017 0.90% FFCB Bonds 2.2 2,000,000 12/28/2018 1.42% FFCB Bonds 2.2 2,000,000 1/25/2019 1.23% FHLB Bonds 3.4 2,000,000 3/30/2020 1.45% FHLMC Bonds 3.5 2,000,000 4/28/2020 1.35% FNMA Bonds 3.7 1,000,000 6/30/2020 1.38% FNMA Bonds 3.7 1,000,000 6/30/2020 1.38% FHLB Bonds 3.7 3,000,000 7/13/2020 1.20% FNMA Bonds 3.8 1,000,000 8/28/2020 1.40% FNMA Bonds 3.8 1,000,000 8/28/2020 1.40% i FNMA Bonds 4.2 2,000,000 1 /19/2021 1.44% TOTAL $ 59,426,722 Investment Mix % of Total WA State Investment Pool 16.47% Bonds 32.02% Snohomish County Investment Pool 51.51 % 100.0% 65,000 60,000 55,000 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 Rate Comparison Current 6-month treasury rate 0.51% Current State Fool rate 0.479/c Blended Edmonds rate Blended Edmonds rate - Bonds Only Interest Income Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0.93% 1.30% ■ 2012 ■ 2013 2014 ■ 2015 2016 Investment Interest through October is $366,322, whereas interest through October of 2015 was $275,598; difference of $90,724. 32 Packet Pg. 174 5.4.a GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GENERAL FUND FUND BALANCES O & SUBFUNDS ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- 12/31 /2015 9/30/2016 10/31 /2016 Q3 YTD 2 — U 001-General Fund $ 9,359,437 $ 5,421,687 $ 5,841,718 $ (4,602,687) $ (3,517,71! 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 519,409 476,976 440,459 (55,606) (78,95( 011-Risk Management Fund 961,512 968,764 969,834 3,051 8,32, 012-Contingency Reserve Fund 4,677,030 4,689,616 4,691,476 5,303 14,44E 013-Mulitmodal Transportation FD 56,487 56,899 56,962 179 47! 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 2,589 5,132 5,137 15 2,54t m 016-Building Maintenance 118,085 118,689 95,182 167,121 (22,90: Total General Fund & Subfunds $ 15,694,549 $ 11,737,762 $ 12,100,768 $ (4,482,623) $ (3,593,78� o m O N L O r V O General Fund & Subfunds r r 20 O $15.69 16 �a $11.74 $12.10 LA c 0 li � 8 c O 4 � m _ r O N Dec 2015 Sept 2016 Oct 2016 L 0 r O r c m E t R .r r a *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 33 Packet Pg. 175 5.4.a GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW CHANGE IN FUND FUND BALANCES BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL ---- ACTUAL ---- FUNDS ---- ACTUAL ---- t 12/31 /2015 9/30/2016 10/31 /2016 Q3 YTD 0 General Fund & Subfunds $ 15,694,549 $ 11,737,762 $ 12,100,768 $ (4,482,623) $ (3,593,78 m W Special Revenue 7,711,345 11,174,980 11,276,001 919,145 3,564,651 2 Debt Service 114,789 126,931 127,873 11,367 13,08, c c Total Governmental Funds $ 23,520,683 $ 23,039,672 $ 23,504,641 $ (3,552,111) $ (16,04; u- r a� m t Governmental Fund Balances -By Fund Group Governmental Fund .r o Balances - Combined m O N 20 30 O r v O 16 15.69 General 24 $23.52 $23.50 W Fund & r*- r Subfunds v ,, 12 $12.10 a 18 O Q- c $11 28'� Special O —_ Revenue 8 7.71 12 R Debt u- Service 2' t c 4 6 0 m r O N - $0.11 $0.13 $0.13 - L Dec 2015 Sept 2016 Oct 2016 Dec 2015 Sept 2016 Oct 2016 U O r c m E t R .r r a *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 34 Packet Pg. 176 5.4.a SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW GOVERNMENTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE: ---- ACTUAL ---- 12/31/2015 9/30/2016 10/31/2016 ---- ACTUAL ---- Q3 YTD 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund $ 68,732 $ 87,611 $ 87,436 $ (22,002) $ 18,70z 111 - Street Fund 514,447 538,951 541,315 (17,690) 26,86E 112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 9,340 1,884,073 1,794,572 490,228 1,785,23,- 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 468,471 458,062 482,168 (14,665) 13,691 118 - Memorial Street Tree 17,919 18,050 18,070 57 15' 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 153,885 175,929 168,920 13,688 15,03! 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 64,481 72,256 72,986 (343) 8,50,1 122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 15,468 14,378 14,424 (327) (1,04z 123 - Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 84,568 88,102 90,608 1,428 6,04( 125 - Real Estate Tax 2 1,629,534 2,281,406 2,377,355 284,957 747,82' 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 2,239,006 2,688,714 2,808,636 322,210 569,63( 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 265,925 265,872 264,524 4,703 (1,40' 129 - Special Projects Fund 38,393 38,673 38,716 122 3Z 130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 137,256 145,876 144,464 (8,163) 7,20E 132 - Parks Construction Fund 897,414 1,266,766 1,214,627 (125,924) 317,21< 136 - Parks Trust Fund 152,249 153,360 153,530 483 1,28' 137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 883,729 902,601 904,789 6,786 21,06( 138 - Sister City Commission 3,785 3,965 3,925 (2,956) 14( 140 - Business Improvement Disrict 66,743 90,335 94,935 (13,446) 28,19,' Total Special Revenue $ 7,711,345 $ 11,174,980 $ 11,276,001 $ 919,145 $ 3,564,65( Special Revenue Funds 15 12 c 9 0 6 3 Specia I Revenue Dec 2015 Sept 2016 Oct 2016 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 35 Packet Pg. 177 5.4.a ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW 0 ENTERPRISE FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND ---- ACTUAL ---- FUNDS ---- ACTUAL ---- 12/31/2015 9/30/2016 10/31/2016 Q3 YTD c 421 - Water Utility Fund $ 16,489,530 $ 16,726,157 $ 16,928,428 $ (409,659) $ 438,89E 422 - Storm Utility Fund 9,589,898 9,782,939 9,760,665 (301,472) 170,761 - 423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 42,657,767 42,907,413 42,697,694 (1,278,719) 39,921 ;a 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 843,960 843,966 843,967 843,962 aD 411 - Combined Utility Operation - 131,139 141,890 47,888 141,89( m Total Enterprise Funds $ 69,581,155 $ 70,391,615 $ 70,372,644 $ 1,098,000 $ 791,48t r c 0 m 0 N L 0 V O Enterprise Fund Balances as of October 31, 2016 r $70,000,000 r L $60,000,000 — 0 a $50,000,000 —$42,697,694 m W $40,000,000 R c $30,000,000 c $20,000,000 16 928 428 ii $9,760,665 $10,000,000 $141,890 $843,967 0 $ 2 Combined Utility Water Storm Sewer/WWTP Bond Reserve 0 N L 0 ci O c� G ci Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 36 Packet Pg. 178 5.4.a SUMMARY OVERVIEW CITY-WIDE FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- 12/31 /2015 9/30/2016 10/31 /2016 Q3 YTD Governmental Funds $ 23,520,683 $ 23,039,672 $ 23,504,641 $ (3,552,111) $ (16,04.- Enterprise Funds 69,581,155 70,391,615 70,372,644 (1,098,000) 791,48E Internal Services Fund 7,650,499 7,732,280 7,791,466 183,240 140,961 Agency Funds 203,102 231,425 229,419 (7,743) 26,31 i Total City-wide Total $100,955,439 $101,394,993 $101,898,170 $ (4,474,614) $ 942,73' Governmental Fund Balances as of October 31, 2016 General Fund & Subfunds 2100,761 Drug Enforcement Fund $87,436 Street Fund $541,315 Combined Street Const/Improve Fund 1 $1,794,572 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund $482,168 Memorial Street Fund $18,070 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund $168,920 Employee Parking Permit Fund $72,986 Youth Scholarship Fund $14,424 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts $90,608 Real Estate Excise Tax 2 Real Estate Excise Tax 1, Parks Acq $2,377,155 $2,808, 31 Gifts Catalog Fund $264,524 Special Projects Fund $38,716 Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement $144,464 Parks Construction Fund 1 $1,214,627 Parks Trust Fund $153,530 Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund $904,789 Sister City Commission $3,925 Transportation Benefit District$ (0) Business Improvement District $94,935 L.I.D. Fund Control $22,738 L.I.D. Guaranty Fund $105,135 2012 LTGO Debt Service Fund $ (0) Equipment Rental Fund Firemen's Pension Fund 1 $229,419 $1 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. $7,791,461 $20,000,000 37 Packet Pg. 179 I 5.4.a I INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND INTERNAL SERVICE BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- FUNDS 12/31 /2015 9/30/2016 10/31 /2016 (, 3 YTD 511 - Equipment Rental Fund $ 7,650,499 $ 7,732,280 $ 7,791,466 $ 183,240 $ 140,961 Total Internal Service Funds $ 7,650,499 $ 7,732,280 $ 7,791,466 $ 183,240 $ 140,961 Internal Service Fund Balances $7.73 $7.79 511- Equipment Rental Fund Sept 2016 Oct 2016 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 38 Packet Pg. 180 5.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Appointment of Donnie Griffin to the Diversity Commission Staff Lead: Patrick Doherty Department: Community Services Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background/History The nine Edmonds Diversity Commission members were originally appointed on October 27, 2015 for staggered 1-, 2- and 3-year terms. Commissioner Gayle Keztel, originally appointed by former Councilmember Petso to Position 8, has resigned, leaving an open position with a term that runs until December 31, 2018. The position opening was advertised via local media, and previous applicants were also notified. Nine applications were received. Three applicants were interviewed by the Commission at their regular meeting on November 2, 2016. Pursuant to ECC 10.65.020(B), new appointments to the Diversity Commission shall be made by the seated Commissioners, subject to confirmation by the City Council. Staff Recommendation Confirm appointment of Donnie Griffin to Position 8 of the Edmonds Diversity Commission to fill the remainder of a term scheduled to expire 12/31/18. Narrative Of the nine applications received by the City for consideration to fill the open position, three applicants were interviewed by the Diversity Commissioners: Ninder Gill, Donnie Griffin and Larry Wechsler. The Commission voted to appoint Donnie Griffin to Position 8 to fill the remainder of a term scheduled to expire 12/31/18. (His application is attached here.) Attachments: Donnie Griffin Packet Pg. 181 5.5.a Cruz, Cindi From: DRY Griffin <donnie89@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 3:21 PM To: Cruz, Cindi Subject: Re: City of Edmonds Diversity Commission Vacancy Ms. Cruz - Yes. Please consider my previously submitted application for the current vacancy. Donnie Griffin On Tuesday, September 20, 2016 9:57 AM, "Cruz, Cindi" <Cindi.CruzCcDedmondswa.gov> wrote: c L There is a vacancy on the City of Edmonds Diversity Commission and since you had applied within the last year for the commission we have kept your application on file. If you would like to have your application considered for the current vacancy please reply to this e-mail on or before 4:30 p.m., o Friday, September 30, 2016. E You may find more information about the vacancy at this link: http://www.edmondswa.gov/ima_qes/COE/Press_Release/PDF/2016/Diversity Commission Opening_ a pdf Sincerely Cindi Cruz Program Coordinator City of Edmonds Economic Development & Community Services 121 5t" Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 425-775-7724 Packet Pg. 182 5.5.a ity of Edmonds Citizen Board and Commission Application (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) NOTE: This form is a public record and maybe subject to disclosure upon request Diversity Commission (Board or Commission) Name: Mr. Donnie Young Griffin Address: 716 Elm Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Date: September 18, 2015 Day Phone: 425 361-7346 Evening Phone: Cell: 503 680-8802 E-mail: donnie89@att.net Occupational status and background: Retired Telecomunications Executive; Retired Human Services Chief Administrator; Semi -Retired Leadership & Organization Development Consultant; Current President and Director (non -compensated) Commur Leaders Round Table of Seattle (Promoting fairness, justice and collaboration of services for the social well-being of Organizational affiliations:_ Chairman, Business Advisory Committee - The Seattle Annual Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Prayer Breakfast Organizing Group; Co-founder. The 180 Criminal -Justice Youth Diversion Program in collaboration with the King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office; Founder, Black Employees Telecommunication Association (BETA) Why are you seeking this appointment? As a person of color who lives in Edmonds, I want to play an active role in making my community inclusive of others, free of cultural bigotry and discrimination and appreciative of the rich demographic mix of citizens who call this place home. What skills and knowledge do you have to meet the selection criteria? Teambuilding, Critical Thinking, Public Policy c Diversity Awareness, Meeting Effectiveness, Adaptive Leadership Skills, Effective Listening, and a sense of Humor! V Please list any other Board, Commission, Committee, or official positions you currently hold with the City of Edmonds:. c None p .r c a� Additional comments: My previous involvements on Divemity Commission -like groups include: Multnomah County Human Rights E t Commission (Portland,OR); and U.S. Commission on Civil Rights - Oregon Advisory Committee Q Please return this completed form to: Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 ca ro lvn.lafave Pedm ondswa.aov Phone:425.771.0247 1 Fax:425.771.0252 Drr ni-Y5r. . Signature Revised 4130114 Packet Pg. 183 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Carl Zapora Proclamation (5 min.) Staff Lead: Mayor Earling Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Carolyn LaFave Background/History Carl Zapora has served as the superintendent of Public Hospital District No.2, Snohomish County and the Verdant Health Commission since 2011. He led the successful rebranding of Public Hospital District No. 2 to the Verdant Health Commission. Prior to his tenure at Verdant, Carl was President and CEO of United Way of Snohomish County. Carl is retiring at the end of 2016 after many years of public service to the Snohomish County Community. Staff Recommendation Narrative In honor of Carl Zapora's upcoming retirement, Mayor Earling will read a proclamation and thank him for his years of service to the community. Attachments: Zapora_Proclamation Packet Pg. 184 O lirarf UMUflan City of Edmonds & Office of the Mayor WHEREAS: Carl J. Zapora has served as the superintendent of Public Hospital District No.2, Snohomish County and the Verdant Health Commission since 2011 and will retire at the end of 2016; and WHEREAS: During Carl's tenure, he led the development of the Verdant Health Commission, taking it from the concept created by the elected commissioners of Public Hospital District No. 2 into a well -respected and effective organization that serves the City of Edmonds and our residents; and WHEREAS: Carl has convened leaders to work together on health and wellness issues, developing the Verdant Partner Roundtable group of 50+ community leaders to meet quarterly and exchange ideas; and WHEREAS: Carl helped rally the community and employers around wellness and led the launch of the 6 Weeks to a Healthier You program that ran from 2012-2014 and served more than 1,000 people in all with measurable health improvements; and WHEREAS: from 2011 to 2015, measured health improvements in the residents of this hospital district include a decrease in the hospitalization rate and increase in life expectancy; and WHEREAS: Carl was instrumental in building the Verdant Community Wellness Center, which offers free or low-cost health and wellness programs and classes to the South Snohomish County community and which serves more than 8,000 citizens per year; and WHEREAS: The City of Edmonds has partnered directly with the Verdant Health Commission on projects including the Health & Fitness Expo, the 3rd Grade Swim Lessons voucher program, and the Bike2Health bike lane improvement project in coordination with the cities of Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace; NOW, THEREFORE, I, DAVID O. EARUNG, Mayor of Edmonds, wish to thank Carl for his commitment to the health and wellness of the people of Edmonds and encourage all residents to join me in extending our gratitude and appreciation to him for his years of service. V- K David O. Earling, Mayor December 6, 2016 Packet Pg. 185 6.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Prosecutor's Annual Report to City Council (15 min.) Staff Lead: Carrie Hlte Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Preparer: Carrie Hite Background/History Annual report Staff Recommendation Council to be briefed on annual services from Prosecutor. Narrative The City of Edmonds contracts with Zachor Thomas for prosecutor services. This is their annual report to City Council. Attachments: CC report 2016 EDM Packet Pg. 186 Zachor, H. James Jr., Attorney Thomas Dane, Attorney P.S.Melanie Zachor & Thomas, Inc., J Arlington Edmonds James M. Zachor, Attorney Rachel Z. Reich, Attorney Prosecuting Attorneys Lake Stevens Crystal L. Fry, Attorney Sunset BuildingLynnwood Chad Krepps, Attorney Elisabeth Gribble, Rule 9 23607 Highway 99, Suite 1D Mill Creek Jennifer V. Flynn, Attorney Edmonds, WA 98026 Monroe LegErin Tel. 425.778.24291FAX 425.778.6925 Mukilteo Sultan M. Ortega Erin M. Ortega Susan E. Bolles Woodway Stephanie Gore TO: The Edmonds City Council RE: Report of the City of Edmonds Prosecuting Attorney DATE: November 29, 2016 History. In April 2004, Judge Jeffrey Goodwin, the Edmonds City Prosecutor, was appointed as Judge to the South Division of the Snohomish County District Court. Our firm, Zachor & Thomas, assumed the interim prosecution for the City of Edmonds. In 2005, the City of Edmonds and our firm entered a contract to provide full time criminal prosecution and other services. The contract gave us the opportunity to set forth the changes we thought necessary to streamline and add efficiencies to the criminal prosecution. These changes along with the appointment and subsequent election of the Honorable Douglas Fair as Judge allowed us to continue in our firm's aggressive approach to hold criminal law violators accountable. With guidance, direction and consistency of the Court and the Edmonds Police Department, we believe we have produced a positive influence and effect on the citizens of Edmonds, the office of prosecuting attorney, defense attorneys, public defenders, defendants, and those who have been the victims of crimes. Personnel. Our firm has expanded and grown over the years and continues to retain exceptionally qualified attorneys and legal staff. Our firm makes it a priority to offer flexible schedules so that our attorneys can continue to work both part time and full time. We have eight attorneys employed with our office. Many of our attorneys have prior court and prosecution experience and many have multiple years of experience. We also employ Rule 9 student interns who are supervised by attorneys in our office. This experience allows for 3rd year law students and graduates to practice law under the supervision of a managing attorney and hone their legal skills. Our associate attorneys include; • Rachel (Hunter) Reich, a graduate of Thomas Cooley Law School, in Grand Rapids, Michigan, is the lead prosecutor for the City of Edmonds, • James M. Zachor, a graduate cum laude from Thomas Cooley Law School in Grand Rapids, Michigan, who along with Ms. Reich, serves as a prosecutor for the City of Edmonds, • Crystal Fry, a graduate of Seattle University School of law, is a seasoned trial attorney and works for our office part time, • Chad Krepps, a graduate of Willamette Law School, assists with the City prosecution for the City of Edmonds, and • Jennifer Flynn, our most recent hire, is a graduate of Boston College. 1IPage Packet Pg. 187 6.2.a Also with our firm is Elisabeth Gribble, a Seattle University Law graduate sitting for the bar exam in 2017. In addition, during the summer of 2016, our office employed Rule 9 intern Patrick Lynch to assist with the prosecution of the City's cases. Ms. Reich directly supervised Mr. Lynch who is currently a student at Indiana University, Maurer School of Law. Ms. Melanie Thomas Dane and H. James Zachor, Jr., continue in their partnership for the City of Edmonds. Ms. Dane as a shareholder and partner in the firm continues to be the case manager and supervisor for the Edmonds' cases. She and Ms. Reich work to ensure proper case management. Case management is essential and includes, but is certainly not limited to, the assignment of cases for charging, preparing arraignments, preparing offers for disposition, responding to discovery requests, responding to defense attorneys, scheduling interviews, talking with witnesses, victims and their families, subpoenaing of witnesses, drafting of legal briefs for trial and motions, reviewing probation recommendations, and assignment for jury trials and bench trials. Ms. Dane is also in charge of all appeals which are filed. She has worked on behalf of the City of Edmonds since 2003. In addition to working with the City of Edmonds, Ms. Dane also serves as the Municipal Court Judge for the City of Black Diamond and serves as a judge pro tempore for King County. H. James Zachor, Jr. serves the City with his expertise in forfeiture matters involving drugs, felonies, firearms and DUI. In addition, he advises the police department in matters involving search warrants and as requested by the Police Department. H. James Zachor, Jr., has practiced law in the State of Washington since 1975, having attended the University of Oregon Law School and Gonzaga Law School. He obtained a Bachelor of Science from Oregon State University where he played football and baseball. He also attended the Universita `di Pavia in Pavia, Italy and the University of Maryland while working for his Master's Degree in Economics. He served five years in the United States Air Force as an interpreter (French and Italian) during the Viet Nam war, While assigned to the National Security Agency, in addition to interrogation of prisoners of war, he was an airborne interpreter on an RC-135, and was awarded the Air Commendation Medal. During this period he also attended survival school (which included prisoner interrogation) and the Defense Language Institute in Monterey, California (furthering his proficiency in the French and Italian languages). Recent Changes impacting Prosecution: In 2014 the Honorable Douglas Fair ran unopposed and was elected to the Snohomish County District Court bench. This election created a judicial vacancy for the City of Edmonds Municipal Court. This vacancy was the first of its kind since Judge Fair took the bench in 2005, filling a vacant position left by the previous judge. Edmonds has seen significant change in the past few years with the appointment of a new judge and the Supreme Court's changes to public defense services. Changes in the judiciary, prosecution, and public defense has an impact on all users of the court. Users of the court include all parties, citizens, defendants, victims, and police who come to rely on the consistency and continuity of the parties and judge. Our office has worked hand in hand with the City and the Court to maintain stability within our court system and continue to effectively manage and prosecute cases. 2 1 Prosecuting Attorney City Council Report 2016 Packet Pg. 188 6.2.a Over the past few years these changes within the court, police department, and the implementation of new public defense standards have impacted the way prosecutions are handled. These changes include additional court appearances, changes in public defense, changes in court rules and laws, changes to the police charging standards which have increased the number of cases reviewed by our office, and court rulings impacting fines and fees which may be imposed on convicted offenders. When we started as the City prosecutors, court was held one time per week. Over time, court days have significantly increased. Starting in 2016, we now have court scheduled every day of the week. This leaves less time for file preparation as our attorneys must be prepared for court every day. In addition to more in -court time, our office has seen a drastic spike in charges being referred to our office for review filing by the Edmond Police Department. Whereas historically the Edmonds police department had directly filed cases with the court and very few matters came to our office for "review" the process has now morphed into sending virtually all investigation cases to our office for review. Some of these changes are mandated statewide as departments now use an electronic citation system called "Sector". Nevertheless, the change has had a dramatic impact on our case load. With the department's use of Sector, our review cases jumped from 47 cases (mostly declines) in 2012, to 180 in 2014. In 2015 our office reviewed 171 cases and in 2016 we are on track to review another 150 cases +/-. Review cases, unlike a direct filing, take additional time to process, prepare, investigate, decline and/or charge. These cases are reviewed at our office where we have a specific program set up to process these cases. The most significant change to prosecution has been the implementation of the new public defense standards by our State Supreme Court. The great unknown to our office, the court, and the City was how the new standards would impact case and court management. A direct result of the new standards has been that the public defenders have significantly increased their staffing due to restrictions on case loads. Prior to these changes, our office primarily dealt with one or two specific defense attorneys from the public defense team. With the implementation of the new defense standards and the change made by the City regarding its defense team, our office began negotiating with all new attorneys who were new to the City, new to the municipal court, and newly appointed to cases. Our office, along with the court and defense team, continues to meet quarterly to build relationships to continue effective case and court management. A likely side -effect of all of these changes has been that our court calendars are larger in volume then they have historically been; albeit, our filings are consistent. As to be expected, when there are transitions with attorneys, cases are often continued so that a new attorney can meet with their client. Continuances can create a backlog of cases but we anticipate that will see a decrease in case volume as cases make their way through the court process. That being said, the City of Edmonds files more criminal cases than the State files into Cascade District Court and nearly as many as the State files into Evergreen District Court. Not including 3 1 Prosecuting Attorney City Council Report 2016 Packet Pg. 189 6.2.a infraction and code violations, the City fled 1,031 criminal cases in 2014 and 1,315 in 2013. In Cascade District Court, the State filed 840 cases in 2014 and 908 cases in 2013. Our office appears for and responds to "discovery" requests for all infraction cases, civil matters such as nuisance, tow, and animal code violations. For the past 2 years our court has averaged over 4000 traffic infraction cases filed into Edmonds Municipal Court. This volume is surpassed only by the City of Lynnwood and the City of Everett. Our legal staff has been working overtime to be sure proper "discovery" is provided timely to ensure that tickets are not dismissed on technical violations. With the numbers below you can see that filings trends ebb and flow over time. This is due to several factors such as the number of officers on staff, changes in charging policy, legal court decisions affecting the admissibility of evidence, and case prosecution priority. As the City directly files most of their cases, our office has little control over how many cases are filed into court. We expect that with the Police Department being fully staffed that our numbers will continue to increase and return to 2012-2013 filing standards. Filings for 2012: Traffic: DUI: Criminal Traffic: Criminal Non Traffic: Total Cases for our office: Total Criminal Cases: Filings for 2014: Traffic: DUI: Criminal Traffic: Criminal Non Traffic: Total Cases for our office: Total Criminal Cases: Filings for 2016- Traffic: DUI: Criminal Traffic: Criminal Non Traffic: Total Cases for our office: Total Criminal Cases: Filings for 2013: 3486 Traffic: 4786 114 DUI: 116 618 Criminal Traffic: 638 591 Criminal Non Traffic: 537 4809 Total Cases for our office: 6077 1323 Total Criminal Cases: 1291 Filings for 2015: 3443 Traffic: 4185 82 DUI: 97 365 Criminal Traffic: 298 582 Criminal Non Traffic: 503 4472 Total Cases for our office: 5083 1029 Total Criminal Cases: 898 thru August: 2668 59 240 339 3306 638 Projected Year 4002 89 360 509 4960 958 Case law changes: In 2015 the State Supreme Court changed the way courts could impose fines and fees for offenders. This change has impacted the court, prosecution, and has had a direct impact on the City. Our Washington State Supreme Court ruled that a court has no inherent authority to collect money not authorized by statute or ordinance. Except where a law states a fine or cost is "mandatory", a judge must take into account a defendants ability to pay. State v. Blazina, 182 4 1 Prosecuting Attorney City Council Report 2016 Packet Pg. 190 Wn. 2d 827 (2015). The Court held that it is a violation of due process for an indigent defendant to be assessed discretionary legal financial obligations, without an individual determination by the judge of defendant's ability to pay. As a direct result of this opinion, the court must take into account at each hearing an individual's future ability to pay costs and assess costs proportionally or waive them entirely. This ruling has had a direct impact on the fines and fee's recommended by our office and assessed and collected by the court. Our office continues to request appropriate fines and fee's and seeks recovery for all restitution in applicable cases. We continue to request both DUI and Domestic Violence recoupment for mandatory fines and assessments against offenders. Changes to DUI laws and DUI prosecution are ever evolving in this state. Our office works with the Washington State Traffic Safety Resource Prosecution program to ensure our prosecutors have the most up to date education and resources in the area of DUI prosecution. For the past few years, Ms. Dane has taught classes in the area of "Implied Consent" with the programs DUI Bootcamp for new prosecutors. Some of our attorneys are recent graduates. Other areas of the firm's practice: Forfeitures. Our firm continues to take a proactive and aggressive approach in dealing with criminal activity and various other legal matters. For example, we represent the South Snohomish County Narcotics Task Force in matters of drug and felony forfeitures, from which the City of Edmonds benefits. We assist the Edmonds Police Department in actions of Drug and Felony Forfeiture, seizing and forfeiting cash proceeds and property acquired with funds and used in drugs manufacturing, acquisitions and sales of drugs and property used to facilitate the commission of felonies. Felony forfeiture of property assists in the restitution and reimbursement to those injured by the crime. The seizure and forfeiture of firearms due to their unlawful use has resulted in a significant number of acquisitions by the police department. The City may also seize and the law allows for the forfeiture of a vehicle of a DUI defendant with more than one DUI within seven years. This ability has proven to be a valuable asset to discourage continued violations of the DUI law. Special Prosecutor. Our firm continues to assist other jurisdictions, which provides to us insight into the tactics and court activity throughout the county. We prosecute more misdemeanors than the Snohomish County Prosecutor's office. We have represented the Snohomish County Prosecutor's Office as special prosecutors in the prosecution of Snohomish County conflict cases which includes the charging of police officers, prosecutor and government officials. Availability of Prosecutors. Our attorneys continue to be available on call to talk with officers in the field to answer immediate questions throughout the day. Our expertise extends to reviewing arrest/search warrants and affidavits (as well as locating judges in the middle of the night to sign such warrants). We provide, as requested, the training and updating of the City's Police Department, in legal updates in the law and procedures. 5 1 Prosecuting Attorney City Council Report 2016 Packet Pg. 191 6.2.a We are still located in the City of Edmonds. We invite the members of the council and the public to attend and observe the working of your justice system. We continue to working closely with the police department, court, and public defenders to address the needs of all court users. Sincerely yours, The Law Office of Zachor & Thomas, Inc., P.S. H. James Zachor, Jr. Melanie Thomas Dane 6 1 Prosecuting Attorney City Council Report 2016 Packet Pg. 192 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments (30 min.) Staff Lead: Shane Hope / Carrie Hite / Rob English Department: Planning Division Preparer: Rob Chave Background/History The Planning Board held a public hearing on the various plan text amendments on November 9, 2016. Council held a review session on November 22nd. The Capital Facilities Plan was heard separately by the Planning Board on October 12, 2016, and the City Council held its public hearing on November 1, 2016. The Council approved the CFP for inclusion in the adopting ordinance on November 22, 2016. Staff Recommendation Hold the public hearing and approve the ordinance adopting the 2016 updates to the Comprehensive Plan (the combination of Exhibits 1, A, B). Narrative The most recent comprehensive plan update was completed in 2015, which was a major review required by the Growth Management Act. Typically, the City undertakes relatively minor amendments in intervening years. The Capital Facilities Plan is reviewed and updated each year and the 2016 update was approved by Council on November 22, 2016 (see Exhibit B). This year, there are also a few minor amendments (see Exhibit A and the summary in Exhibit 2). Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are approved once a year, by ordinance. The City Attorney has drafted an ordinance for the 2016 amendments (attached as Exhibit 1). The two exhibits referenced in the ordinance are attached to this agenda item as Exhibit A and Exhibit B. NOTE: A question came up at the November 22nd Council meeting as to whether the dog park at Marina Beach could be permitted under the Shoreline Master Program and critical area regulations if it were proposed today as a new dog park. A dog park is considered a recreational development and subject to the recreation element of the SMP. Dog parks are not specifically listed as a prohibited use in the SMP. The shoreline environmental designation of the existing dog park site is Conservancy. The SMP allows low intensity water -oriented recreational use and development within the Conservancy environment. The SMP defines "water -oriented uses" as any combination of water -dependent, water -related, and/or water -enjoyment uses. The definition of "water -enjoyment use" specifically lists parks as a water enjoyment use. So, if an application were made under the SMP to establish a dog park at its current Packet Pg. 193 8.1 location, such a dog park could be permitted, assuming appropriate application information is submitted. There are no critical areas at the site as it exists today. When Willow Creek is day -lighted, any development, including a dog park, would be subject to the critical area restoration project provisions in ECDC 23.40.215. Any application would be required to demonstrate compliance with the SMP and critical area regulations. Attachments: Exhibit 1: 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update Ordinance Exhibit A: 2016 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan Exhibit 2: Summary of 2016 Comprehensive Plan Updates Exhibit 3: Planning Board Minutes Exhibit 4: Planning Board Minutes regarding CFP Packet Pg. 194 8.1.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; ADOPTING VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE AND CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENTS OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the Planning Board held a public hearing on this year's various plan text amendments on November 9, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a review session on November 22, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) was heard separately by the Planning Board on October 12, 2016, and the City Council held its public hearing on November 1, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the CFP for inclusion in the adopting ordinance on November 22, 2016; and WHEREAS, on December 6, 2016, the City Council held a public hearing on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan amendments; NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The 2016 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as follows: a) the recently adopted Marina Beach Master Plan, which is contained in Exhibit A hereto, is hereby added as a new Appendix D to the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) -1- Packet Pg. 195 8.1.a Plan, which is an element of the Comprehensive Plan; b) the discussion of Marina Beach in Appendix A to the PROS Plan, page A-39, is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; c) page 4-8 of the Action Plan in Chapter 4 of the PROS Plan is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A hereto; d) the Performance Measures discussion on page 144 of the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A hereto. Exhibit A, which is attached hereto, is fully incorporated herein by this reference as if it were set forth in full. Section 2. The 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan, which is an element of the Comprehensive Plan, is hereby adopted to read as set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein. Exhibit B completely replaces the 2016-2021 Capital Facilities Plan. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: APPROVED: MAYOR DAVE EARLING -2- Packet Pg. 196 C) T�cia~ to CA H n��d yxd C7 y y C� n Or C� t' Attachment: Exhibit 1: 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update Ordinance (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan 8.1.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; ADOPTING VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE AND CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENTS OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2016. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 4814-2355-3038, v. 1 W Packet Pg. 198 CO b- Attachment: Exhibit A: 2016 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan pin S Z D M D Z O Attachment: Exhibit A: 2016 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan n Q CD D CL 0 r+ r� v 00 r� U) r+ r� r� r� FOJ ra Attachment: Exhibit A: 2016 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Marina Beach Park Regional Park 200 400 Feet I s Park Features • 3.37 Acres • 0.5 Miles walking trail • Playground • Sand volleyball court • Small boat launch (ramp) • View point • Portable restrooms (3) • Shoreline access, gravel beach • Off -leash dog area Site considerations Replace with: "See Appendix D, Marina Beach Master Plan" • Zoned Commercial Waterfront • Marine Protected Area • 31 additional parking stalls provided by Port of Edmonds under SEPA/SMP approval permit • Likely to be improved by creek daylighting Planned Improvements Replace with: "Implement Master Plan" • Site master plan and implementation • Restroom (large) • Replace play area (large) • Continued maintenance Appendix A: Existing System A-39 Packet Pg. 202 City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan 3.J Use the opportunity of upgrades and maintenance at the Senior Center site to integrate the property more completely with the rest of the waterfront. 3.K Secure ongoing funding for the Beach Ranger program, recognizing the important role in tourism, building a connection to the shoreline and expanding appreciation for natural resources and habitat conservation. Goal 4: Natural Resource and Habitat Conservation 4.A Inventory and classify natural resources and habitat areas within of the park system. 4.B Conduct a city tree inventory and map to create a baseline of information to enhance tree canopy. 4.0 Connect new generations of residents and visitors to natural resources in Edmonds through Discovery Programs utilizing ranger naturalists. 4.D Collaborate on public information programs to help property owners (including the City) identify and remove invasive vegetation. 4.E Collaborate with various organizations in invasive plant removal and native vegetation planting in accord with landscaping plans for parks within the city limits. Suggest park maintenance projects that would be good candidates for the annual Arbor Day event sponsored by the Tree Board. 4.F Provide low impact access to natural resource areas to allow for enjoyment and interaction with nature. 4.G Steward the urban forest using appropriate maintenance of street and park trees, clear removal and replacement policies and providing information about urban forestry to property owners. 4. H Relocate incompatible uses from sensitive areas (i.e. waterfront dog park at Marina Beach Park). 4.1 Consider expanding the function and facilities around the Willow Creek Hatchery to create a more expansive interpretive center that includes the Edmonds Marsh. 4.H Ensure uses in environmentally sensitive areas are consistent with critical area regulations and the Shoreline Master Program. 4-8 Chapter 4: Action Plan Packet Pg. 203 8.1.b Implementation Actions and Performance Measures Implementation actions are steps that are intended to be taken within a specified timeframe to address high priority sustainability goals. In addition, the Comprehensive Plan contains a small number performance measures (no more than one per element) that can be used to monitor and annually report on the implementation and effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan contains a small number performance measures (no more than one per element) that can be used to monitor and annually report on the implementation and effectiveness of the Comprehensive Plan. Performance measures, as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, are specific, meaningful, and easily obtainable items that relate to sustainability and can be reported on an annual basis. They are intended to help assess progress toward achieving the goals and policy direction of each major Comprehensive Plan element. The measure identified below is specifically called out as matching the above criteria and being important to capital facilities goals and will be reported annually, along with performance measures for other Comprehensive Plan elements. It is not intended to be the only measure that the City may use for capital facilities purposes. Implementation Action: Develop level of service standards for key public facilities by the end of 2017 and consider including the standards in the Comprehensive Plan. Performance Measure: Project delivery results - based on comparing projects in the Capital Facilities Plan to what is actually done on the projects. Capital Facilities 144 Packet Pg. 204 8.1.b Following is a list ofpublicly-owned facilities in Edmonds and other nearby areas. QIFm H Q m N Name m' o Name m' o Elm St Park 1.85 CoE Frances Anderson Center Field 1.94 CoE Haines Wharf 0.69 CoE Hickman Park 5.61 CoE Hummingbird Hill Park 1.22 CoE Mathay Ballinger Park 0.51 CoE Pine Street Park 1.47 CoE Seaview Park 6.05 CoE Sierra Park 5.52 CoE Subtotal 24.86 Civic Center Playfield Boys and Girls Club Stadium Skate Park City Park Yost Memorial Park Pool Subtotal 7.92 13.96 44.14 66.02 CoE 6,856 CoE 7,140 CoE 6,000 CoE CoE CoE 4,808� 24,804 Regional Parks 144 Railroad Ave Tidelands 0.9 CoE Brackett's Landing North 5.11 CoE Brackett's Landing South 2.22 CoE Marina Beach Park 3.37 CoE Olympic Beach 2.82 CoE Senior Center 2.63 CoE Subtotal 17.05 Special Use Parks Centennial Plaza 0.08 CoE Dayton Street Plaza _ 0.1 CoE Edmonds Library and Plaza Room 1.29 CoE Edmonds Memorial Cemetery and Columbarium 6.63 CoE Anderson Center Field 1.62 CoE Hazel Miller Plaza 0.09 CoE Interurban Trail _ 4.88 CoE Lake Ballinger Access 0.19 CoE Meadowdale Community Clubhouse 0.99 3,232 CoE Ocean Ave Viewpoint 0.2 CoE Point Edwards Scenic Overlook (easement) 0.1 CoE Richard F. Anway Park 0.17 CoE Stamm Overlook 0.36 CoE Sunset Ave 1.14 CoE Willow Creek Hatchery 1.68 CoE Subtotal 19.52 3.232 Edmonds Marsh 23.37 CoE Edmonds Marsh Open Space 0.85 CoE Haines Tidelands _ 0.44 CoE Hutt Park _ 4.53 CoE Maplewood Hill Park 9.96 CoE Meadowdale Natural Areas 1.07 CoE Olympic View Open Space 0.49 CoE Pine Ridge Park 23.78 CoE Seaview Reservoir 1.31 CoE Shell Creek Open Space 1.04 CoE Wharf Street 0.12 CoE Willow Creek Park 2.25 CoE Subtotal 69.21 Marina Waterfront Businesses Harbor Square Business Complex Subtotal 8.1 14.22 15.11 37.43 PoE PoE PoE Ither City Owned Facilities Log Cabin Visitor Center/Chamber of Commerce 372 CoE City Hall _0.03 _0.59 34,074 CoE Edmonds Historical Museum 0.12 2,084 CoE Edmonds Library and Plaza Room 3.03 19,520 CoE Fire Station #16 10,700 CoE Fire Station #17 9,800 CoE Fire Station #20 _ 6,400 CoE Fishing Pier Ranger Station 1,200 CoE Fishing Pier Restroom 918 CoE Frances Anderson Center 55,000 CoE Karlsten House 0.22 2,250 CoE 'Old' Public Works 3.94 14,100 CoE Sewage Treatment Plant 115,200 CoE Public Safety Complex 2.61 30,940 CoE Public Works Operation and Maintenance Center 4.35 28,000 CoE Wade James Theatre 2.34 6,289 CoE Subtotal 17.23 336.847 Chase Lake Elementary 10.26 57,697 ESD 15 Edmonds Elementary School 8.58 34,726 ESD 15 Edmonds-Woodway High School 30.19 208,912 ESD 15 Former Woodway High School 39.75 148,740 ESD 15 Edmonds Homeschool Resource (K-12) ESD 15 Schriber Lake High School ESD 15 Madrona School (K-8) 31.3 85,505 ESD 15 Maplewood Parent Cooperative (K-8) 7.41 76,554 ESD 15 Maplewood Center (K-12) ESD 15 Seaview Elementary 8.28 49,420 ESD 15 Sherwood Elementary 13.19 43,284 ESD 15 Westgate Elementary 8.34 44,237 ESD 15 Woodway Elementary 9.89 37,291 ESD 15 Subtotal 167.19 786,366 Chase Lake Natural Area College Place Elementary College Place Middle School Lynndale Elementary School Meadowdale High School Meadowdale Middle School Meadowdale Elementary School Meadowdale Playfields 10.8 ESD 15 9 48,180 18.7 87,031 10 39,043 39.56 197,306 ESD 15 19.38 102,925 ESD 15 8.78 57,111 ESD 15 24.09 ESD 15 Subtotal 140.31 531,596 Edmonds Center for the Arts 2.54 PFD Edmonds Conference Center 0.33 11,252 EDCC Edmonds Fishing Pier 0.61 WDFW Edmonds Underwater Park and Higgins Trails 33.21 DNR Olympic View Water District Maintenance Facility 0.83 7,480 OVWD Public Utility Water District #1 0.68 PUD Subtotal 38.2 18,732 Ballinger Playfield and Former Golf Course Esperance County Park Meadowdale Beach County Park South County Park Figure 43: List of Publicly -owned Capital Facilities Capital Facilities 52.59 MLT 9.59 SnoCo 144.34 SnoCo 118.55 SnoCo Subtotal 325.07 140 Packet Pg. 205 City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Civic Center Playfields & Skate Park Other Parks and Facilities Park Features • 7.92 Acres • 0.3 miles of walking trail • Playground • Basketball courts (2) • Tennis courts (2) • Football field (1 youth) • Soccer fields (1 adult, 1 youth) Site considerations • Owned by Edmonds School District • Operated by City of Edmonds • Zoned Public Use Feet • Skate park • Portable restrooms (2) • Petanque courts (4) • Cinder track (.25 miles) • Stadium • This site used for 4t" of July Fireworks display, Taste of Edmonds, Wenatchee Youth Circus Planned Improvements • Acquisition, master planning and development • Add large play area • Continued maintenance A-20 Appendix A: Existing System Packet Pg. 206 v 0 CD W v rn x zT 07 O 0 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) =�E &IM N O J l 1 y r r y b r O 0 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) CO C'1 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) w G� z n It It Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) PO 0 CO C'1 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) 8.1.c 01 Current Grant Project (2017-2022) Project Name Purpose Opportunity Phase Total Cost Revenue Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Aquatic Facility Meet citizen needs for an Aquatics $0 Public Vote Center (Feasibility study complete Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds August 2009). $0 $0 Total 5-$23 M Civic Center Development City master plan in progress $0 Public Vote RCO Land Conceptual $135,000 REET 1 / Grants $135,000 Acquisition $0 G.O. Bonds $135000 Total $135,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $3,135,000 Community Park / Athletic Complex - In cooperation with ESD#15 develop $0 Capital Campaign Old Woodway High School: Phase 2 and 3 a community park and athletic ROO Phasel $0 REET 2 complex. Complete $0 School District $0 Foundation so Grants $0 Total Unknown Parks & Facilities Maintenance & Operations Replace / Renovate deteriorating $0 Public Vote Building building in City Park. Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds $0 $0 Total $3-4M Waterfront Redevlopment/Walerfront Walkway Rehabilitate grounds, parking, beach $1,600,000 REET / Grants $1,600,000 Completion access and area around Senior Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds Center, walkway access. $500,000 Park Impact Fees $500,000 $0 Private Partnership $2,100,000 Total $2,100,000 Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry / Mutimodal Relocate ferry terminal to Marina EIS $0 Federal (Unsecured) Facility Beach. US DOT Completed $0 Stale Funds $0 Total Unknown Public Market (Downtown Waterfront) Acquire and develop property for a year round public market. Unknown Conceptual SO Grants I s0 Total Unknown Total CFP $2,235,000 Annual CFP Totals $2,100,000 $0 $0 $0 1 $1,500,000 1 $1,500,000 r Q Packet Pg. 212 CO C'1 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Facility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 — $23,000,000 Man PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the current pool. SCHEDULE: 2021-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $5m - $23m x all or part of this Project may quality for 1% for the Arts r a 7 Packet Pg. 214 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,135,000 / Stadium Demolition PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition. As part of the Master planning process for Civic, and in consideration of the current condition of the stadium, it is being recommended to demolish the current stadium. The City also has some grant funds available to assist with this. In addition, develop a signature downtown park at this site. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Civic Center Development / Stadium Demolition. The Civic Master plan will be complete by early 2017. Funds will be set aside, and grant funds applied for in order to develop the master plan. This is a high priority in the PROS plan. SCHEDULE: 2017 - 2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Construction $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 TOTAL $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Packet Pg. 215 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN DESCRIPTION PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown Complex at the Former Woodway High School FORMER WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC FIELD IMPROVEMENTS PRE PAnto fOX THE E DMON DS SCHOOL DISH ICT ra CIA HOGAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted or unlighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District, community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project for all 3 phases. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and under maintained facility with great potential as community multi -use active park. Site has existing controlled access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees. Phase 1 was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phases 2 & 3 will be completed in the future for an additional $6-8M. SCHEDULE: 2017-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023- COST 2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction 1 % for Art TOTALI Unknown " all or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts a 9 Packet Pg. 216 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million Maintenance & Operations Building Existing Building Outline Yard Fu Mo 4 0 o , 100 L adirtg T..� New One S, 1,600 sf 6,600 s# Building Driveway — 15,800� Yard Functions � 11,910 If Perimeter zone — 4,200 st Existing Fence Line 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City parks and Capital facilities for the long term. SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real estate taxes. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $3m - $4m r a 'all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 10 Packet Pg. 217 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Redevelopment ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,100,000 / Waterfront Walkway Completion • rn To Bncn }- � ®R.--� � kYr�4 Prapvwd Rmw4 W arerlront Ganrer j ;I ;rrra5: r �Mw ww r 1 _ - ftioge.ed oaF�.s "Fnr rw rarer, raecnrwr tdnn v BFa Wa y! 4yEFYM"MPa•.- � ,, a:/» ��aewa wwe.rr - mEy�.rw trnn PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with Sr. Center to renovate surrounding park, parking lot and walkway. Remove creosote pier, reintroduce habitat for fish and wildlife. Increase access to the waterfront. Connect waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing South to Olympic Beach, including completion in front of the Ebb tide condominiums. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide anew Senior and Community Center and provide a new beachfront walkway. One of the top priorities in the PROS plan is to open up beach -front access. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $100,000 Construction $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 1 % for Art TOTAL $2,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 all or part of this Project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts w a 11 Packet Pg. 218 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Crossing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown WSDOT Ferry / Multimodal Facility 011114*�M* Modified Pt. Edwards Alternative p - uHacu paf of�'s„y,� �.r ym ee mnmaol A1r4r IMrJ� yQy„ w.nvwr �� mom am •.w Edw��.ls .e+.s..nm PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds Crossing is multimodal transportation center that will provide the capacity to respond to growth while providing improved opportunities for connecting various forms of travel including rail, ferry, bus, walking and ridesharing. NOTE: The design of Marina Beach Park is a separate project. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide an efficient point of connection between existing and planned transportation modes. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023- 2037 Engineering & Administration of Way —Right Construction 1 % for Art TOTALI JUnknown c a. N N LL Q M m Z x w c a� E V M a all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 12 Packet Pg. 219 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Public Market (Downtown ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown Waterfront) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to establish a public market, year around, on the downtown waterfront area. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The project will help to create a community gathering area, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a valuable asset to Edmonds. SCHEDULE: This project depends on the ability to secure grant funding, and community partners willing to work with the city to establish this. This potentially can be accomplished by 2018. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL Unknown * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 13 Packet Pg. 220 CO C'1 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) n ITI It PO 0 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) CO C'1 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) 0) City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017.2022) Project Name Pu se Opportunity Project Phase Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Safetv / Capacity Analvsis 228th St. SW Corridor Safety Realign highly skewed intersection to $25,000 (Federal or State secured) $25,000 Improvements address safety and improve $0 (Federal or Stale unsecured) operations; create new east -west corridor between SR-99 and 1-5. Construction $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total 228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. Install two-way left turn lanes and $0 (Federal or State secured) W sidewalks to improve capacity and $375,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $75,000 $300,000 $8,690,00 pedestrian safety (project split with Snohomish County) Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $1,356,00 $375,000 Total $75,000 $300,000 $10,046,00 76th Av. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection improvements to improve $3,006,500 (Federal or State secured) $2,920,000 $86,500 Intersection Improvements intersection delay and level of service $0 (Federal or State unsecured) (LOS). Construction $0 (Unsecured) $2,086,663 (Local Funds) $2,073,163 $13,500 $5,093,163 Total $4,993,163 $100,000 Highway 99 Gateway / Revitalization Install gateway elements and safety $10,000,000 (Federal or State secured) $5,000,000 $5,000,00 improvements along SR-99 Corridor. $2,600,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,600,000 $1,000,000 $72,400,00 State Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) Appropriation $300,000 (Local Funds) $300,000 $12,900,000 Total $300,000 $6,600,000 $6,000,000 $72,400,00 SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave W Improve intersection safety by $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements converting a stop controlled $744,500 State $122,000 $87,500 $535,000 intersection for NB and SB (Federal or unsecured) movements to a signalized Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) intersection. $158,500 (Local Funds) $71,000 $87,500 $903,000 Total $193,000 $175,000 $535,000 Main St. and 9th Ave S Install traffic signal to improve $0 (Federal or State secured) intersection delay and Level of Service $894,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $118,000 $776,000 (mini roundabout is an alternative solution). Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $17,000 (Local Funds) $17,000 $911,000 Total $135,000 $776,000 76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW Convert split phasing operation for EB $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements and WB movements to concurrent $5,637,450 (Federal or Stale unsecured) $285,450 $1,557,000 $3,795,00 through movements, with protected / permissive LT phasing. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $287,550 (Local Funds) $44,550 $243,000 $5,925,000 Total $330,000 $1,800,000 $3,795,00 Hwy 99 @ 212th St SW Intersection Widen 212th St. SW to add a $0 (Federal or Stale secured) Improvements westbound left turn lane for 200' $2,783,000 (Federal or Stale unsecured) $152,000 $1,091,000 $1,540,00 storage length and an eastbound left turn lane. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $23,000 (Local Funds) $23,000 $2,806,000 Total $175,000 $1,091,000 $1,540,00 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017.2022) Project Name Purpose Opportunity Project Phase Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection Widen 216th St. SW to add a left turn $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvement lane for eastbound and westbound movements. $2,313,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $142,000 $334,000 $1,837,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $22,000 (Local Funds) $22,000 $2,335,000 Total $164,000 $334,000 $1,837,00 Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW Intersection Widen 220th St. SW and Hwy 99 to $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvement add a westbound right turn lane (for 325'storage length) and a soutbound $3,192,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $152,000 $1,085,000 $1,955,00 left turn lane (for 275' storage length). Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $23,000 (Local Funds) $23,000 $3,215,000 Total $175,000 $1,085,000 $1,955,00 SR-104 @ 226th St. SW / 15th St. SW Extend left turn storage area for WB $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements movement on SR-104 w/ various bicycle and pedestrian improvements. $179,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $15,000 $164,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $15,000 (Local Funds) $15,000 $194,000 Total $30,000 $164,000 SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Convert EB and WB LT along SR-104 $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvements to protected LT phasing; upgrade ADA $485,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $65,000 $420,000 curb ramps; and add C-Curb for access management Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $10,000 (Local Funds) $10,000 $495,000 Total $75,000 $420,000 SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Install traffic signal to improve $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvements vehicular and pedestrian safety; revise geometry to allow for safer turns. $1,311,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $173,000 $1,138,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $27,000 (Local Funds) $27,000 $1,338,000 Total $200,000 $1,138,000 Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. W Install traffic signal to reduce the $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements intersection delay and improve Level of Service. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,183,000 Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,183,000 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to 238th St. Install two-way left turn lanes and $0 (Federal or State secured) SW) sidewalk to improve capacity and pedestrian safety (split with $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $15,441,000 Snohomish County) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $15,441,000 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017.2022) 1 Project Name Purpose Opportunity Project Phase Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 SR-104 @ 100th Ave. W Intersection / Implement Westgate Circulation $0 (Federal or State secured) Westgate Area Improvements Access Plan, midblock pedestrian $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,017,468 crossings along 100th Ave. W, and rechannelization with bike lanes / Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) sharrows along 100th Ave. W. $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,017,468 SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Add a 2nd WB left turn lane (split with $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvements Shoreline). $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $3,017,000 Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $3,017,000 Olympic View Dr. @ 174th St. SW Install traffic signal to improve Level of $0 (Federal or State secured) Intersection Improvements Service and intersection delay. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $610,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $610,000 Non -motorized Pedestrian /Bicycle Projects Sunset Ave. Walkway from Bell St. to Provide walkway on the west side of $157,121 (Federal or State secured) $157,121 Caspers St. Sunset Ave, with various utility upgrades. Possible $1,870,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,870,000 RCO / TIB Grant Design $0 (Unsecured) for construction $751,129 (Local Funds) $26,129 $725,000 $2,778,250 Total $183,250 $2,595,000 Dayton St. between 7th Ave. S to 8th Provide safe sidewalk along short $0 (Federal or State secured) Ave. S Walkway missing link. $37,500 (Federal or State unsecured) $37,500 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $37,500 (Local Funds) $37,500 $75,000 Total $75,000 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR Improve pedestrian safety along $0 (Federal or State secured) 104 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. to SR-104. $1,205,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $100,000 $1,105,00 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $100,000 (Local Funds) $100,000 $1,305,000 Total $200,000 $1,105,00 238th St. SW from 100th Ave. W to Improve pedestrian safety along 238th $12,000 (Federal or State secured) $12,000 104th Ave. W St. SW from 100th Ave. to 104th Ave. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Construction $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $12,000 Total $12,000 236th St SW from Edmonds Way (SR- Improve pedestrian safety along 236th $50,600 (Federal or State secured) $50,600 104) to Madrona Elementary St. SW, creating a safe pedestrian $0 (Federal or State unsecured) connection from SR-104 to Madrona school. Construction $0 (Unsecured) $38,000 (Local Funds) $38,000 $88,600 Total $88,600 236th St SW from Edmonds Way Improve pedestrian safety along 236th $0 (Federal or State secured) (SR-104) to 97th Ave. W St. SW, creating a safe pedestrian connection from SR-104. $1,288,500 (Federal or State unsecured) $106,500 $1,182,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $106,500 (Local Funds) $106,500 $1,395,000 Total $213,000 $1,182,000 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) to City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017.2022) Project Name Purpose Opportunity Project Phase Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 84th Ave. W from 238th St. SW to Improve pedestrian safety along 84th $0 (Federal or State secured) 234th St. SW Ave. W. from 238th St. SW to 234th $90,000 State $90,000 $495,000 St SW. (Federal or unsecured) Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $90,000 Total $90,0001 $495,000 80th Ave. W from 212th St SW to 206th Improve pedestrian safety along 80th $0 (Federal or State secured) St. SW Ave. W, within proximity to Edmonds- Woodway High School. $1,439,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $210,000 $1,229,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $1,439,000 Total $210,000 $1,229,000 2nd Ave. S from James St. to Main St. Provide safe sidewalk along short $0 (Federal or State secured) Walkway missing link. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $30,000 (Local Funds) $30,000 $30,000 Total $30,000 Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th Provide safe sidewalk, connecting to $0 (Federal or State secured) St. SW ex. sidewalk along 200th St. SW (direct link to Maplewood Elementary $1,591,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $230,000 $681,000 $650,000 School). Possible grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $1,591,000 Total $230,000 $681,000 $680,000 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th Provide sidewalk on one side of 95th $0 (Federal or State secured) St. SW PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. $409,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $84,000 $325,000 SW completing missing link) Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $141,000 (Local Funds) $21,000 $120,000 $550,000 Total $105,000 $445,000 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Provide safe sidewalk along a missing $0 (Federal or State secured) Ave. W link of 218th St. SW. from 76th Ave. to $978,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $100,000 $878,000 84th Ave. Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $327,000 (Local Funds) $100,000 $227,000 $1,305,000 Total $200,000 $1,105,00 Walnut St from 3rd Ave. S to 4th Ave. S Provide short missing link. $0 (Federal or State secured) Walkway $105,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $105,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $105,000 Total $105,000 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to Provide sidewalk on north side of $0 (Federal or State secured) 72nd Ave W 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd $137,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $137,000 Ave W (completing missing link) Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $20,000 (Local Funds) $20,000 $157,000 Total $157,000 238th St. SW from SR-104 to Hwy. 99 Provide sidewalk on north side of $316,800 (Federal or State secured) $316,800 238th St. SW from SR-104 to Hwy. 99 $0 (Federal or State unsecured) (completing missing link) Design $0 (Unsecured) $96,200 (Local Funds) $96,200 $413,000 Total $413,000 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. Provide sidewalk on south side of 15th $0 (Federal or State secured) S St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S (completing missing link) $200,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $200,000 Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $30,000 (Local Funds) $30,000 $230,000 Total $30,000 $200,000 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) 10 City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017.2022) Project Name Purpose Opportunity Project Phase Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Elm Way from 8th Ave. S to 9lh Ave. S Provide sidewalk on one side of Elm $0 (Federal or State secured) Way from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S $789,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $156,000 $633,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $789,000 Total $156,000 $633,000 Minor Sidewalk Program Complete short sidewalk stretches $0 (Federal or State secured) throughout the City (annual program) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $320,000 (Local Funds) $70,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $700,000 $320,000 Total $70,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $700,000 191st St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Provide sidewalk on one side of 191th $0 (Federal or State secured) Ave. W St. SW from 80th Ave. to 76th Ave. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $630,000 (completing missing link) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $630,000 104th Ave. W / Robinhood Lane from Provide sidewalk on west side of $0 (Federal or State secured) 238th St. SW to 106th Ave. W 104th Ave. from 238th St. SW to 106th $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $990,000 Ave. W (completing missing link) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $990,000 80th Ave. W from 218th St. SW to Provide sidewalk on one side of 80th $0 (Federal or State secured) 220th St. SW Ave. W from 218th St. SW to 220th St. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $315,000 SW (completing missing link) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $315,000 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to Provide sidewalk on one side of 84th $0 (Federal or State secured) 186th St. SW Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $315,000 SW Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $315,000 236th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. Provide sidewalk on one side of 236th $0 (Federal or State secured) W St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $765,000 Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $765,000 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. Provide sidewalk on one side of 238th $0 (Federal or State secured) W St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave W $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,170,000 Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,170,000 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) City of Edmonds Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Transportation Projects (2017-2022) Grant (2017.2022) Project Name Purpose Opportunity Project Phase Total Cost Funding Source 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 80th Ave. W / 180th St. SW from 188th Provide sidewalk on one side of 80th $0 (Federal or State secured) St. SW to OVD Ave. W / 180th St. SW from 188th St. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,350,000 SW to OVD Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,350,000 189th PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Provide sidewalk on one side of 189th $0 (Federal or State secured) Ave. W PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $585,000 W Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $585,000 Ferrv/Railroad Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine Improve ferry queueing by extending $0 (Federal or State secured) St. to Dayton St. ferry storage area along SR-104 (striping changes). $357,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $357,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $357,000 Total $357,000 Traffic Plannina Proiects Trackside Warning System at Dayton Install wayside horns at both crossings $0 (Federal or State secured) St. and Main St. Railroad Crossings to reduce noise from train horns. $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Design / $0 (Unsecured) Construction $10,000 (Local Funds) $10,000 $10,000 Total $10,000 Edmonds Street Overpass Install grade -separated overcrossing $23,820,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $350,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,470,OOC $19,500,000 over the railroad tracks as an extension of Edmonds Street Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) connecting to Brackett's Landing North $150,000 (Local funds) $150,000 park. $23,970,000 Total $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,470,000 $19,500,000 ir Total CFP $49,300,013 1 Annual CFP Totals 1 $6,570,013 1 $650,000 1 $50,000 1 $6,260,000 1 $18,778,000 1 $21,462,000 1 $130,529,468 Revenue Summary by Year Totals Source 2017 T2018 1 2019 1 2020 1 2021 2022 1 2023.2037 $13,568,021 Total Federal & State (Secured $3,481,521 $86,500 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,0001 $0 $30,809,950 Total Federal & State Unsecured $350,0001 $500,0001 $0 $5,017,4501 $13,077,5001 $16,185,0001 $127,863,468 $0 Unsecured $0 $01 $0 $01 $0 $0 $610,000 $4,947,042 LocalFundsl $2,763,4921 $63,5001 $50,0001 $1,242,5501 $700,5001 $277,0001 $2,056,000 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 228t St. SW Corridor ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $7,300,000 Safety Improvements J PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1) Extend 228th St across the unopened right-of-way to 76th Avenue West 2) Signalize the intersection of 228th St SW @ SR99 and 228th St. SW @ 76th Ave. West 3) Construct a raised median in the vicinity of 76th Avenue West. 4) Add illumination between 224th St SW and 228th St SW on SR 99 5) Overlay of 228th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to — 2,000' east of 76th Ave. W. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project will improve access / safety to the 1-5 / Mountlake Terrace Park & Ride from SR99. This east / west connection will reduce demand and congestion along two east -west corridors (220th Street SW and SR104). Roadway safety will also be improved as SR 99/ 228th Street SW will become a signalized intersection. 228th St. SW is being overlaid from 80th Pl. W to -- 1,000 LF east of 72"d Ave. W. as well as 76th Ave. W from 228th St. SW to Hwy. 99. The project consists of various utility upgrades. SCHEDULE: Construction began in 2015 and substantial completion was obtained in May 2016. Physical completion is scheduled to be reached in October 2016. The only remaining task in 2017 is the completion of the Federal documentation. Federal and State grants were secured for the construction phase. This project was combined into one construction contract with the Hwy. 99 (Phase 3) Lighting project. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering, Administration, and ROW Construction $25,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $25,000 All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1 % for the arts 22 Packet Pg. 230 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 228 th St. SW from Hwy. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,421,000 99 to 95th PI. W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 228 th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95 th PI. W to three lanes with two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety and traffic flow along this corridor. SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2021 (pending funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $75,000 $300,000 Construction $9,821,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 $300,000 $9,821,000 23 Packet Pg. 231 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 76 Ave W @ 212 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,500,000 Intersection Improvements 1 EDMONDS-WOODWAY HIGH SCHOOL I OFFICE W a R .. G" L` 1301 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a northbound and southbound left -turn lane to convert the signal operation for those approaches from split phasing to protected -permissive phasing. Add a right -turn lane for the westbound, southbound, and northbound movements. The project also consists of various utility upgrades and conversion of overhead utilities to underground. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the existing level of service to LOS C. SCHEDULE: Design was completed in May 2016. The project was advertised in June 2016 but the lowest bid was rejected since it was - approx. $1.3 Million over budget. The project is scheduled to be re -advertised in early 2017. A TIB grant to cover the possible shortfall was submitted in August 2016. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW Construction $4,993,163 $100,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $4,993,163 $100,000 w a 24 Packet Pg. 232 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Highway 99 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $85,000,000 Gateway/Revitalization PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would include, among other features, wider replacement sidewalks or new sidewalk where none exist today, new street lighting, center medians for access control and turning movements, etc., attractive and safe crosswalks, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve aesthetics, safety, user experience, and access management along this corridor. In addition, economic development would be improved. SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled to begin in 2017 (pending approval of the 2017 decision package).An HSIP grant was also submitted in July 2016 for this project. The construction phase is scheduled to begin in 2021 (pending additional funding / $10M from Connecting Washington allocation has been secured). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & $300,000 $6,600,000 Administration & ROW Construction $6,000,000 $72,400,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $300,000 $6,600,000 $6,000,000 $72,400,000 25 Packet Pg. 233 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: SR-524 (196t" St. SW)/ 88t" ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $903,000 Ave. W Intersection Improvements 3 w a SEVEN DAY ADVENl1ST CHURCH 196TH Sf SW L IRP 1-1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196 th St. SW @ 88 th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196t" St. SW. SCHEDULE: The intersection LOS must meet MUTCD traffic signal warrants and be approved by WSDOT since 196t" St. SW is a State Route (SR524). No funding is currently allocated to this project (pending grant funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & $193,000 $175,000 Administration & ROW Construction $535,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $193,000 $175,000 $535,000 w a 26 Packet Pg. 234 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Main Stand 9th Ave. S :1 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $911,000 BELL Sr I � LLF -� �' W a _ a MAIN St I _ I WADE JAM ES _ - THEATER W ' a J S H - DAYTON 5 , PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a traffic signal (or mini -roundabout is an alternative solution). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015 Transportation Plan. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2021 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $135,000 Construction $776,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $135,000 $776,000 27 Packet Pg. 235 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 220" St SW @ 76t" Ave W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Intersection Improvements $5,925,000 2,9rH sr sw J 21919 J J J 3 14 I' Lri ,a Ui in J _J 1 2215TPLSW TOP FOODS JSTARBU KS J 220TH ST SW — 1 r LYNWOOD HONDA PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected -permitted phase for eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2035 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D. SCHEDULE: Engineering, ROW, and construction scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & ROW $330,000 $1,800,000 Administration Construction $3,795,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $330,000 $1,800,000 $3,795,000 ' All or a portion of this project may quality for 1 % for the arts 28 Packet Pg. 236 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,806,000 intersection improvements 21 g sw:T I i W W Paalung sign Shop / n 7313 P.U.B 3 Edmonds Edmonds / W Family Clinic ei ADD Publm%Torks KENNEL 21 1 21114 / f Arbor Apt Q �az 211 / ofNlla Ramps 21109 / n he Box / 212TH ST Sw 7,.5�• a T'2"215TH LTW 9RI PLANT AEGIS W SWEDISH k�MDNnSCAM— ' ALLIED / ROOFING / / / B&M / CON ST 21414 / 21448 / / / NCOONRLD' Q( / 01 1ALUE / PILLAGE / 16TH ST/SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 212 th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200' storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300' storage length. Provide protected left turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #4) PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding).The project cost is split between Lynnwood and Edmonds since half the project is in Lynnwood. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering, ROW, & Administration $175,000 $1,091,000 Construction $1,540,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $175,000 $1,091,000 $1,540,000 w a 29 Packet Pg. 237 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 216 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,335,000 intersection improvements w c W 21401 { r o 04 N LU > Mun V01 2i43� �z r 215 AEGIS 21558 2 VALUE VILLAGE ST SW • 216 Tli S, 21600 {� 21619 KRUGER f CLINIC 21632 01 - � � ��I19e 21405 an SW 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 216t St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for and an eastbound left turn lane. Provide protected -permissive left turn phases for eastbound and westbound movements. This project ranked #3 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & ROW & Administration $164,000 $334,000 Construction $1,837,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $164,000 $3349000 $1,837,000 w a 30 Packet Pg. 238 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,215,000 intersection improvements 19TH ST SW 21919 f,ill 7514 221 ST PL SW I I I 13 -- a n I FEi FZ/ TOP FOODS 220TH Sr SW LYNWOOD HONDA a _ iL FUNTASIA H'S IN N L7 w .F 7223'J' n 7391 'HA Jo aH¢ nm M. r PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325' storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275 storage length. (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #1). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce intersection delay and improve traffic flow and safety. SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2020 and 2022 (unsecured funding for all phases). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 COST Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $175,000 $1,085,000 Construction $1,955,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $175,000 $1,085,000 $1,955,000 c M a as LL r Q M 0 m x w c a� E a 31 Packet Pg. 239 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 226 1h St. SW / ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $194,000 15t" St. SW Intersection Improvements 14TH WAY SW 226TH ST SW uJ 226TH PL SW 'N' M PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Extend the left turn lane for the westbound movement on SR-104. Complete various pedestrian and bicycle intersection improvements. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve non -motorized transportation safety at the intersection and improve traffic flow along the SR-104 corridor. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $30,000 Construction $164,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $30,000 $164,000 32 Packet Pg. 240 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 95" PI. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $495,000 Intersection Improvements r W 06 a Ln al en Cn 'H ST SW 1 WESTGATI C APE PARKING ■ 1 WESTGATE CHAPEL PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $75,000 Construction $420,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 $420,000 33 Packet Pg. 241 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 238" St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,338,000 Intersection Improvements To Hwy 99 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The warrants are met for such an installation. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $200,000 Construction $1,138,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $1,138,000 34 Packet Pg. 242 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76 Ave. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: W Intersection Improvements $1,183,000 N SEAVIEW PARK 3 PLSW 186TH ST SW ml I m-I PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards (LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2023 and 2037 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $200,000 Construction $983,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,183,000 w a 35 Packet Pg. 243 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 84" Ave. W (212 St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,441,000 to 238t" St. SW) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84 th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along this collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with their own facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any back-up to the through lane when insufficient gaps are provided. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2023 and 2037 (unsecured funding). The project cost is split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since half the project is in Esperance. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & $2,000,000 Administration Construction $13,441,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $15,441,000 all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. c cu IL W 2 U_ �a r .Q m t x w r c a� E r w a 36 Packet Pg. 244 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 100t Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,017,468 Intersection Improvements • hO EDMONDS WAY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block pedestrian crossing along 100t" Ave. W, and re -striping of 100t" Ave. W with the potential addition of bike lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve non -motorized transportation safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $150,000 Construction $867,468 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,017,468 a 37 Packet Pg. 245 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: SR-104 @ 76 Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,017,000 Intersection Improvements x M1 M1 } W dM1 - P^1 --En&WW Dri 1ELA.Y-_--------_LAKE BALLING €RWAY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: DESCRIPTION: Add a 2 nd left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve non -motorized transportation safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037. The project cost would be split between Shoreline and Edmonds since half the intersection is in Shoreline. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $453,000 Construction $2,564,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $3,017,000 38 Packet Pg. 246 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 174t" St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $610,000 SW Intersection Improvements u�gti II'llm ��il�� oil sso' St. Thomas Moore °ffp Catholic School I B Ilfield y I-" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50' storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13) PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2023 and 2037 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $100,000 Construction $510,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $610,000 r a 39 Packet Pg. 247 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,000,000 from Bell St to Caspers St. ♦ ♦ �� I■� 11111■0 I ♦ ♦ OW �♦ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a walkway on the west side of the street, facing waterfront (— 1/2 mile / more recent project). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Temporary improvements have been installed to evaluate the alignment of the proposed walkway. Additional modification to the temporary improvements will be completed in 2017 (since construction isn't scheduled to occur until 2019 / 2020 when utility improvements are scheduled along this stretch). No grant funding has yet been secured for the construction phase. The design phase will be completed in 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 COST Planning/Study Engineering & $183,250 Administration Construction $2,595,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $183,250 $2,595,000 all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. w a 40 Packet Pg. 248 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Dayton St Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $75,000 between 7t" Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S MAIM ST z NO -ISLE FRANCES ANDERSON 4v0 tA W ❑ Q � 660 701 DAYTOM ST w MAPLE 5T -T77 T � a k PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 250') on Dayton St. between 7t" Ave. S and 8t" Ave. S (ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $75,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $75,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 41 Packet Pg. 249 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 232 nd St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000 from 100t" Ave. W to SR-104 EDMONDS WAY W SANK iwnRs LLI L ! Ell 2 . ■ ■ Qy - 1 �i IF Al. 10 UUT H ' CHURCH, (jr ■ ■ ■ , Uj 7 , ■ AW �I o �0 c� 2 ODW' ' I ESTATES AY OLy I _ PR RK \29 9 Dorn 98 7 6 5 ' 30 2 15 3 14 7• J \32 45 32 ■ r jr `2q 7 1 nm (0) 1 � ■ � e PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 232"d St. SW from 100t Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $200,000 Construction $1,105,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $1,105,000 ti 0 ti r c M a W 2 M LL Q M m x w c m E a 42 Packet Pg. 250 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 238 St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,400,000 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W and Stormwater Improvements BASEBALL FIELD HICKMAN PARK 23 V 2 COMM wn m LIBRARY � a 23 TO 42 OLD WOODWAYHIGH SCHOOL 3 a 236TH PL SW Z 0 3 3 J LU F Q O F a Q Q 4 a 238TH ST SW O � M - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of -- 1,200' of sidewalk on the north side of 238t St. SW from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W. as well as sharrows. Stormwater improvements will also be incorporated into the project. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety and create a safe pedestrian connection between 100th Ave. W and 104th Ave. W. SCHEDULE: Construction is complete. The project was funded by the Safe Routes to School grant program. Stormwater improvements were funded by the Stormwater Utility Fund 422. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $12,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $12,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts w a 43 Packet Pg. 251 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 236t" St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $900,000 Edmonds Way to Madrona Elementary School PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an — 800' sidewalk on the south side of 236 th St. SW from SR-104 to Madrona Elementary as well as the addition of sharrows along that stretch. (This is only part of a stretch of Walkway project, which ranked #1 in the Long Walkway list in the 2009 Transportation Plan) PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route near Madrona Elementary School and along 236t" St. SW. SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled to start in Fall 2016 and be completed by Spring 2017. The project is funded through the Safe Routes to School Grant program, Fund 422 for stormwater improvements, and REET funds for the pavement reconstruction. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW Construction $88,600 1 % for Art TOTAL $88,600 44 Packet Pg. 252 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 236 th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,395,000 from Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W —�sr'sw 1, M _ —232N1 PL 5 m ■ ■ W 7 � ` 233rto-sr� . ■ � i ■ � � � ■ ■ Jr ■ ■ w a �r ■ , ' Ym 234THTSr'SW= 41 ■ ` 235fH:Sr SIR+ IF ,oil .:� i w T a_ . .PCSW b� o' IN IN 236TH Si SW � m - f 23&H-Si_SW I' �..� Ir ■ ■ -2367HPus W 1 ■ ■ _ ■ 237-rH PL SW ! a PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236 nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary to 97t" Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $213,000 Construction $1,182,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $213,000 $1,182,000 45 Packet Pg. 253 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 841Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000 From 238th St. SW to 234th ST. SW L PARK EonnoNos SAL GALLL APTS m w w LL CH RIST LNTH E RAN CH N RCH O PARK & RIDE OFFICE 236:1 4SUHSET 23603 SAFEWAY $23605 WH L KJIHG R23607 23619 0 P ���R AURORAS MARKETPLACET N 239TH ST SW W SEOUL 23821 PLAZA 2 23827 TRAVEL LODGE 0" NORTH ry HAVEN z n MANOR w a � R p r~ } n•1L LO'N 13ROCK PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84 th Ave. W from 238 th St .SW to 234 th St. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: Begin design in 2022 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $90,000 Construction $495,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $90,000 $495,000 a 46 Packet Pg. 254 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 801Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,439,000 from 206t" St. SW to 212t" ST. SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206 th St. SW to 212 th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve non -motorized transportation safety. SCHEDULE: 2020-2022 (funding unsecured). A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program grant to fund the design phase was submitted in May 2016 (response scheduled for Spring 2017). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $210,000 Construction $1,229,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $210,000 $1,229,000 47 Packet Pg. 255 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 2nd Ave. S Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000 James St. to Main St. 4t 3� <1 NG 4 F5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 2nd Ave. S between Main St. 2015 Transportation Plan). Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 100') on and James St. (Ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: 2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $30,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $30,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 48 Packet Pg. 256 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,591,000 from Main St. to 200th St. SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200t St. SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #22 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized transportation to walk to / from school. SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2020 and construction in 2022 (funding unsecured). A grant application through Safe Routes to School Program was submitted in May 2016 for design funding (response scheduled for Spring 2017). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & $230,000 Administration Construction $681,000 $680,000 1 % for Art TOTAL 1 $230,000 $681,000 $680,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 49 Packet Pg. 257 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 95 1h PI. W Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $550,000 2241" ST. SW to 220t" St. SW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 95 th PI. W from 224 th ST. SW to 220th ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #9 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2020 and construction in 2021 (funding unsecured). A TIB grant application was submitted in August 2016 to fund this project (response scheduled for November 2016). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2036 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $105,000 Construction $445,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $105,000 $445,000 50 Packet Pg. 258 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 21 8thSt. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,305,000 from 76t" Ave. W to 84t" Ave. W ■■■■N� ���■■ mom oENT ER PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 218t St. SW from 76t Ave. W to 84 th Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The improvements will improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2021-2022 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $200,000 Construction $1,105,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $200,000 $1,105,000 51 Packet Pg. 259 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. Walkway from 3r ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $105,000 Ave. S to 4t" Ave. S ARTS W ENTER a Z UNDOW NEI N ALDER ALDER ST 346 414 412 410 arking 5 5 LA UJ o SOUND VIEW o: HOWELL WAY W a x v DAYTON ST OLD MILLTOWN MAPLE ST TRIC ALDER ST N W a FBECKWT'S z BAN K T- 409 530Pancak 407 540 Hau s 4003 546 0 401 w a WALNUT Sr --F GREGORY e H 525 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 350') on Walnut St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4t" Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $10,000 Construction $95,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $105,000 all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts 52 Packet Pg. 260 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 216 St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $157,000 Hwy. 99 to 72"d Ave. W 7200 PARK & RIDE 7309 5TEVE N MAN oa M1 rlao 21407 21507 21511 J y IL 0 211 52 M STEVEN COIL RT 21527 27B7H 120 EVENS FILION �� 21500 AEGIS S 21600 KRUGER CLINIC 210 B &M40 CONS 21410 21408 0. 21401 21412 r 21420 21�MCDONALD' Ln Ilk {4 21558 VALUE VILLAGE 216 TIl { 21619 A PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216 th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of stretch). This project ranked #4 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $30,000 Construction $127,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $157,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts w a 53 Packet Pg. 261 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 238 St. SW Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $491,000 Hwy. 99 to SR-104 i 1 L PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #12 in Long Walkway list from 2015 Transportation Plan. Install 5' sidewalk on the north side of 238t" St. SW. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and creating safe pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76t" Ave. W. SCHEDULE: The design phase is underway and will be completed by early 2017. Construction is scheduled for 2017. A TIB grant was secured to fund the design and construction phases. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $413,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $413,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 54 Packet Pg. 262 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 15 St. SW Walkway from 8 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $240,000 Ave. S to 9th Ave. S au _ ; 813 495 1440 f23 / r ( 8(5 811 98 vial M1 v 9111, 982 t,39 807 909 1452 \ y 7 a/ 5 9906 4832 22665 Edmonds Memorial Cemetery PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add missing sidewalk link along 15 St. SW from 8t Ave. S to 9t Ave S PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and providing pedestrian connection from 9th Ave. S. SCHEDULE: The design phase will be completed in 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $30,000 Construction $200,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $30,000 $200,000 all or part of this project may quality for 1 % for the Arts. w a 55 Packet Pg. 263 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Elm Way Walkway from ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $789,000 8t" Ave. S to 9t" Ave. S 4 �^ W ■ I 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along Elm Way from 8t Ave. S to 9t Ave. S. This project ranked #6 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2020-2021 (funding unsecured). A Safe Routes to School grant application was submitted in May 2016 to fund the design and construction phases of this project (response scheduled for Spring 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $156,000 Construction $633,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $156,000 $633,000 w a 56 Packet Pg. 264 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Minor Sidewalk Program ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: varies PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete missing sidewalk along short segments throughout the City. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: annual program COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Construction $60,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $70,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 57 Packet Pg. 265 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 191th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $630,000 from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W 1� 192ND PL 5W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76 th Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $90,000 Construction $540,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $630,000 58 Packet Pg. 266 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 104 th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $990,000 from 238t" St. SW to 106t" Ave. W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 104 th Ave. W from 238t ST. SW to 106t Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $150,000 Construction $840,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $990,000 59 Packet Pg. 267 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 801h Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000 from 218t" St. SW to 220t" St. SW ❑ 2 CA Golden n , 5TEVE HEAL °0 ' Leaves i EVENS A K ' Ir m x LEGEND ESTATES WES1 ISLE . ' J 218TH ST SW NMI Elm a ■ 7a IN 219TH ST SW ME r � m — -------�T--------- Iti --- ---- _220THSTSW_ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80t Ave. W from 218t ST. SW to 220t ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $55,000 Construction $260,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $315,000 60 Packet Pg. 268 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 841Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $315,000 from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW ME T Jr r Sw r .} F i L ■ ` a ■ r r ri 186TH ST w m w _ �i i� ■� r ■ 18 TH 5 5w ■ z�BrN 5 L 7 1 r5w LE SFAMF W 4E 1 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 84 th Ave. W from 188 th St. SW to 186 th St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $60,000 Construction $255,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $315,000 a Packet Pg. 269 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 236 th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $765,000 from Hwy 99 to 76t" Ave. W ■ PARK & RIDE 236TH ST SW_ 23607 23603 SAFEN 23605 � KJI 23607 NON PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 236t St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76t Ave. W. This project ranked #11 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $115,000 Construction $650,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $765,000 62 Packet Pg. 270 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 238thSt. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,170,000 from Hwy 99 to 76t" Ave. W 1 PARK r .•nrIRL NA LN ' , ■ ' EOMONOs APTS BALL ' • • 1 ��r� W w Ov NORTH m CH RIST LH THE RAN CHURCH S N PARK & RIDE R n - 2 TH T OFFICE ■ d `� ,4 , W r SAFEWAY � L KJIHG FC,� I ' L • . SUNSET '•n•1L LO•n: CEj BROOK ■ AURORA- MARKETPLACE FAMILYPANCAKEr j7' � 1 ■ 238TH 5T 5W "' ■ ■ ■ 23827 seouL PLAZAMEN ' ■ ► 1 Will x 11 23827, TRAVEL LODGE 2397 ■ -MISISON TACO TIM ■ ST. FRA NCIS MOTEL WHSE ■ME . . . - ■ ■ ■ _+ K&EMOTEL 1 1 ■ ■ � I, 1:11 RIl RIl III F 1 ■ ■ ■ � , IN ■ ■ :yA ■ ■ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 238t St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76t Ave. W This project ranked #12 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $175,000 Construction $995,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,170,000 c M a a� LL Q M m x w c a� E r, a 63 Packet Pg. 271 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 80 Ave. W / 180 St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,350,000 SW Walkway from 188" St. SW to OVD PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188 th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $270,000 Construction $1,080,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $1,350,000 64 Packet Pg. 272 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: 189thPI. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $585,000 from 80t" Ave. W to 76t" Ave. W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install sidewalk along 189t PI. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76 th Ave. W. This project ranked #14 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: This project would improve pedestrian safety. SCHEDULE: 2023-2037 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $115,000 Construction $470,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $585,000 65 Packet Pg. 273 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Ferry Storage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $357,000 Improvements from Pine St. Dayton St. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways. SCHEDULE: 2020 (unsecured funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $50,000 Construction $307,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $357,000 66 Packet Pg. 274 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Trackside Warning System ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $350,000 @ Dayton and Main St. RR Crossing PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install Trackside Warning System @ Dayton and Main St. Railroad Crossings. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Reduce noise from train horns at both intersections. SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled to be completed by late 2016 or early 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $10,000 1 % for Art TOTAL $10,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1 % for the Arts. 67 Packet Pg. 275 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Street Overpass ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $24,000,000 • f 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project builds a grade -separated overcrossing over the railroad i y tracks as an extension of Edmonds Street connecting to Brackett's Landing north park. C c PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Provide access for emergency vehicles, pedestrians, and s bicycles. The overpass could be utilized to offload passenger vehicles from a ferry during an o extended closure of the railroad track crossings. r SCHEDULE: 2017-2037 c 0 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023-2037 c u c Planning/Study $500,000 $500,000 C Engineering & $500,000 $500,000 $770,000 a Administration s s Right of Way / $1,700,000 u Environment Mitigation ` E s c Construction $19,500,001 ; y TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,470,000 $19,500,001 68 Packet Pg. 276 CO C'1 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) 0 n ITI It Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) PO 0 CO C'1 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) 8.1.c Project Name Purpose Grant Opportunity Grant/Date Current Project Phase (2017-2022) Total Cost 2017 201 2019 2020 2021 2022 Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Add lift station and other new infrastructure to reduce $0 (Federal or State secured) Improvements. intersection flooding. Design $0 (Federal or State unsecured) $1,950,000 (DebUStormwater Fees) $1,900,000 $50,000 $1,950,000 Total $1,900,000 $50,000 Willow Creek/Daylighting Daylight channel to allow better connnectivity with the Puget RCO SRF Grant $0 (Federal or State secured) Sound to benefit fish and reduce flooding. Possible Grant/TBD Study $4,200,000 (Federal or State unsecured) $225,000 $225,000 $1,800,000 $1,950,000 $1,420,000 (DebUStormwater) $75,000 $75,000 $600,000 $650,000 $20,( $5,620,000 Total $300,000 $300,000 $2,400,000 $2,600,000 $20,( Perrinville Creek High Flow Find solution to high peak stream flows caused by excessive Ecology Grant $510,375 (Federal or State secured) $510,375 Reduction/Management Project - stormwater runoff that erodes the stream, causes flooding Possible Grant/TBD Design $1,087,500 (Federal or State unsecured) $337,500 $375,000 $375,000 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility and has negative impacts on aquatic habitat. $582,625 (DebUStormwater Fees) $170,125 $112,500 $125,000 $125,000 $50,( $2,180,500 Total $680,500 $450,000 $500,000 $500,1) $50,( Total CFP $9,750,500 Annual CFP Totals $2,880,500 1 $800,000 1 $2,900,000 1 $3,100,000 1 $0 $70,OOC v N Revenue Summary by Year Totals Source 2017 1 2018 1 2019 2020 2021 2022 $510,375 Total Federal& State (Secured) $510,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,287,500 Total Federal & State (Unsecured) $225,000 $562,500 $2,175,000 $2,325,000 $0 $3,952,625 Debt/ Stormwater Fees $2,145,125 $237,500 $725,000 $775,000 $0 $70,( Packet Pg. 280 CO C'1 Attachment: Exhibit B: Capital Facilities Plan (1707 : Public Hearing and Potential Action on 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments) 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Dayton St and Hwy 104 ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,227,700 Drainage Improvements e PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add lift station in the Beach Place parking lot and other new infrastructure. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: To reduce flooding at the intersection of Dayton St and State Hwy 104. SCHEDULE: 2017-2019 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $100,000 Construction $1,800,000 $50,000 1% for Art $10,000 TOTAL $1,900,000 $50,000 74 Packet Pg. 282 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Willow Creek Daylighting ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,825,000 Edmonds Marsh as seen from the viewing platform. Previously restored section of Willow Creek. Source: www.unocaledmonds.info/clean-U/ ag llery_php PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Building on the studies completed in 2013 and 2015 that assessed the feasibility of daylighting the Willow Creek channel, this project will likely construct a new tide gate and 1,100 linear ft of new creek channel lined with an impermeable membrane. Funds will be used for design and construction but exact breakdown cannot be assessed at this time. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: The daylighting of Willow Creek will help reverse the negative impacts to Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped in the early 1960s. This project will provide habitat for salmonids, including rearing of juvenile Chinook. This project, along with its companion CIP projects "Edmonds Marsh Channel Improvements" and "Dayton Street Pump Station," will also help reduce the flooding problem at the intersection of SR-104 and Dayton Street. SCHEDULE: 2017-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $459,278 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 Construction 1 % for Art TOTAL $459,278 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 75 Packet Pg. 283 8.1.c PROJECT NAME: Perrinville Creek High Flow ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,532,950 Reduction/Management Project Talhot Frederick a C n m 1 4t 185th 00 M U 87th 04 1 4Q7{L 172n w 173 d Nc a Perrinville d4 Creek th :i 78th 77th+ 1 78th -w 1 Oth m 181s to m a �RRfL n n t Perrinville Creek Channel illustrating the channel incision that will be addressed by restoration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A flow reduction study for the Perrinville Creek basin was completed in 2014. This study recommended a number of flow control and water quality projects to improve the conditions in Perrinville Creek. The City applied for and won a grant from the Department of Ecology for $633,750 to design and construct a stormwater infiltration facility in Seaview Park. The 2017 budget is for that facility. The dollars allocated in the out years are to implement additional water quality and flow control projects in the Perrinville Creek basin as recommended by the Flow Reduction Study. PROJECT BENEFIT/RATIONALE: Urbanization of the Perrinville Creek Basin has increased flows in the creek, incision of the creek, and sedimentation in the low -gradient downstream reaches of the creek. Before any habitat improvements can be implemented, the flows must be controlled or these improvements will be washed away. SCHEDULE: 2017-2022 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 COST Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $35,000 $50,000 50000 50000 $50,000 $50,000 Construction $944,000 $400,000 $450,000 $450000 1% for Art $3,950 $1,125 $1,250 $1,250 TOTAL $982,950 $451,125 $501,250 $501,250 $50,000 $50,000 w a 76 Packet Pg. 284 8.1.d 2016-2017 Comprehensive Plan Updates 1. Parks Plan amendments recognizing the Marina Beach Master Plan. a. Include the adopted Marina Beach Master Plan as a new "Appendix D" to the PROS Plan. b. Modify the PROS Plan, Appendix A, pg. 39, as follows: Under "Site considerations," replace the last bullet with "See Appendix D, Marina Beach Master Plan" Under "Planned Improvements," replace the first bullet with "Implement the Master Plan" c. Modify PROS Plan, Goal 4, Policy 4.1-1, pg. 4-8, to reflect adopted plans and codes: Current: "Relocate incompatible uses from sensitive areas (i.e., waterfront dog park at Marina Beach Park)." Replace with: "Ensure uses in environmentally sensitive areas are consistent with critical area regulations and the Shoreline Master Program." 2. Capital Facilities Element Add an implementation action to the Capital Facilities Element (Comprehensive Plan pg. 144): "Develop level of service standards for key public facilities by the end of 2017 and consider including the standards in the Comprehensive Plan." 3. Water Comprehensive Plan Plan is being developed with a draft due before the end of the year (2016). Approval is scheduled for first quarter 2017. Any specific references to the current (2010) plan will also need to be updated. 4. Street Tree Plan Plan is being developed with a draft due around the end of the year (2016). Approval is scheduled for first quarter 2017. Any specific references to the current plan will also need to be updated. Packet Pg. 285 8.1.e Mr. Jones explained that moving the tennis courts to the northeast corner could be an option, but it would block the view for a different set of homeowners. The southwest corner is the entry of the park from downtown, and they probably don't want a fenced edge in that location. If they are moved to the southeast corner, there will be concern that the tennis courts are taking away other opportunities for active recreation. He pointed out that they are in a location that has generally worked, and views can be addressed as they move forward with final design. He emphasized that the City does not intend to put up a chain link fence with slats along the perimeter of the tennis courts as shown in the picture that was submitted during the hearing. A member of the audience suggested that perhaps one tennis court could be eliminated from the plan, and a new tennis court could be constructed in the southwest corner of City Park. Chair Lovell responded that the plan has gone through an extensive public process to arrive at the two tennis courts that have been proposed. Concerns about view blockage have been raised, and the design team has indicated that is possible to address the concerns. Another member of the audience explained that those who spoke about a fence along the northern edge of the park are simply interested in having a barrier incorporated into the plan to discourage people from leaving the park and entering directly onto the narrow alley. Chair Lovell said the design team understands the challenges in this location and will address safety and access issues as part of the final design, whether it be fencing or landscaping. Board Member Cheung asked if the proposed picnic area could be reserved for group activities. Mr. Jones said the plan does not address this level of detail. Board Member Robles asked if the master plan would identify parking for park users who do not live close to the park. Ms. Hite answered that there would be no parking on the park site. The public made it clear that they did not want any of the park space to be used for parking. However, there is parking on 6th and 7th Avenues. The design team has proposed some parking upgrades for both of these streets, but the upgrades will not be part of the actual park development. UPON REVIEW OF THE PACKAGE SUBMITTED FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING AND UPON HEARING AND READING THE PUBLIC COMMENTS PROVIDED, VICE CHAIR RUBENKONIG MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL OF THE MASTER PLAN OF THE CIVIC CENTER TO THE CITY COUNCIL, LETTING THE RECORD SPEAK TO THE COMMUNITY'S CONCERNS. HOWEVER, CERTAIN ISSUES WARRANT FURTHER ATTENTION SUCH AS: • ADDRESS THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE ALLEY BARRIER FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY. • MAINTAIN THE MATURE TREE IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER. • INCREASE THE MULTI -PURPOSE ACTIVITY IF POSSIBLE WITHIN DESIGN CONSTRAINTS. • KEEP THE VISION OF A SIGNATURE PARK. • PROVIDE FUTURE DESIGNATED DROP-OFF AREAS ON 6TH AND 7TH AVENUES. • INTRODUCE OTHER ELEMENTS INTO THE TENNIS COURTS. BOARD MEMBER ROBLES SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING ON 2016 COMPRENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Mr. Chave advised that only minor amendments have been proposed for the Comprehensive Plan in 2016. These include amendments to the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan to recognize and incorporate the Marina Beach Master Plan, and an amendment to the Capital Facilities Element to add an implementation action. In addition, a couple of more substantial amendments are being developed relative to the Water Comprehensive Plan and Street Tree Plan. These will be ready for the Planning Board's consideration after the first of the year. Vice Chair Rubenkonig pointed out that the list of City -owned parks needs to be updated to include Civic Park. Chair Lovell opened the public hearing. There was no one in the audience to participate in the hearing, and the hearing was subsequently closed. Planning Board Minutes November 9, 2016 Page 13 Packet Pg. 286 8.1.e Board Member Monroe referred to the proposed amendment to the PROS Plan that would replace the existing language in Policy 4.H with the following: "Ensure uses in environmentally sensitive areas are consistent with critical area regulations and the Shoreline Master Program. " He asked how the proposed amendment would impact the dog park that is identified in the Marina Beach Master Plan. Ms. Hite explained that Policy 4.H was adopted prior to the Marina Beach Master Plan. She reviewed that, based on community feedback, the dog park was included in the master plan. This decision made the master plan inconsistent with the current language in Policy 4.H, which reads, "Relocate incompatible uses from sensitive areas. " CHAIR LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS AS PRESENTED. BOARD MEMBER MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Chair Lovell reviewed that the Board's November 23`d meeting has been cancelled. The agenda for their December 14th meeting will include a public hearing on the draft Highway 99 Area Plan and election of officers for 2017. The December 28'b meeting has been cancelled. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Lovell reported that he and Vice Chair Rubenkonig met with Mayor Earling, who indicated that the sign code may be coming back to the Board for additional review. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked staff to provide an update on the City Council's decision to place a moratorium on the sign code. Mr. Chave said the City Council passed a resolution suspending enforcement of the pedestrian sign aspects of the sign code. They will form a task group to come up with some potential solutions to concerns that have been raised. ADJOURNMENT The Board meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Planning Board Minutes November 9, 2016 Page 14 Packet Pg. 287 8.1.e Vice Chair Rubenkonig requested clarification relative to the schedule for the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project, which is described on Page 58 of the Staff Report. Mr. English reviewed that staff provided a report to the City Council in August relative to the concept of building a walkway on the west side of Sunset Avenue. Currently, there is temporary striping that designates a walkway area, but there has been quite a lot of discussion about where the parking should be located, what kind of parking should be provided, etc. Parallel with the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project is a utility improvement project. The City is considering options for improving the lift station on Sunset Avenue south of Caspers Street to install a new gravity line to take sewage to the treatment plant rather than having to pump it. A waterline also needs to be replaced. No permanent walkway or designated parking would be constructed until after the utility work has been completed in 2017. He agreed to clarify the schedule in the project description. Vice Chair Rubenkonig observed that the proposed sidewalk project on 232nd Street SW from 100th Avenue W to SR-104 (Page 60 of the Staff Report) would provide the fastest walking route to Westgate from the intersection with SR-104, and the City should encourage people to use it as such. She also suggested that the CIP and CFP should include a listing of the sources recommending action to help citizens know how long a project has been in the making, and the embedded vicinity maps may be easier to navigate if compass points were included. While providing footage of the sidewalk projects has begun, it could be completed, and highlighting project areas could assist the reader in identifying the size and location of the proposed work. Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked for clarification about the Pine Ridge Forest Management Study, which is described on Page 105 of the Staff Report. In particular, she asked if the City has done similar studies for other parks in the past. Ms. Hite explained that the Public Works, Planning and Parks Departments are coordinating an effort to complete an Urban Forestry Management Plan for the entire City in 2016 and 2017, but there are a lot of older trees in Pine Ridge Park that warrant an evaluation to assess the City's liability, etc. Chair Rubenkonig pointed out that the acronym WWTP (Page 117 of the Staff Report) should be spelled out as the Waste Water Treatment Plant. She also referred to the Table that lists the publicly -owned facilities in Edmonds and other nearby areas and suggested that the Civic Center Playfield should be removed from the list of school district properties and added to the list of City -owned properties. VICE CHAIR RUBENKONIG MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) AND CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) FOR 2016 THROUGH 2O22 TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL BASED ON THE COMMENTS PROVIDED BY THE BOARD. BOARD MEMBER STEWART SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. THE BOARD RECESSED THE MEETING FOR A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK AT 8:20 P.M. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:27 P.M. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Mr. Chave reviewed that the most recent Comprehensive Plan update was completed in 2015, and included a major review as required by the Growth Management Act. Typically, the City undertakes relatively minor amendments in intervening years. This year's amendments will include the following: Amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated CFP. Amending the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan to include the adopted Marina Beach Master Plan as a new "Appendix D." Appendix A would also be amended to acknowledge and reflect the Marina Beach Master Plan. Amending the Capital Facilities Element to add an implementation action that would read, "Develop level of service standards for key public facilities by the end of 2017 and consider including the standards in the Comprehensive Plan." In addition to the amendments listed above, Mr. Chave advised that two more substantial amendments are currently being developed: The Water Comprehensive Plan and the Street Tree Plan. Drafts of each of the plans are due before the end of Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 8 Packet Pg. 288 8.1.e 2016, and approval is scheduled for the first quarter of 2017. Any specific references to the current plans will need to be updated, as well. The two plans will be ready for the Planning Board's consideration after the first of the year. Mr. Chave summarized that the Board has completed its public hearing and recommendation to the City Council relative to Amendment 1, and the public hearings for Amendments 2 and 3 are scheduled for November 9"h. Chair Lovell asked if the City plans to hire a consultant to assist staff in preparing an Urban Forestry Management Plan. Mr. Chave answered affirmatively and noted that funding has been allocated for the project, and staff is working on a Request for Proposals. However, the Street Tree Plan is separate and will precede the Urban Forestry Management Plan. Chair Lovell said his understanding is that the Marina Beach and Civic Field Master Plans, once adopted into the Comprehensive Plan, will represent what the community wants programmatically for the two sites, but they should not be considered final designs. Ms. Hite agreed that the master plans should not be considered design or construction documents. Instead, they are schematic designs that represent the community's thoughts and desires. It is always good practice to officially adopt the master plans into the Comprehensive Plan so there are no questions about the process. Once adopted into the Comprehensive Plan, Parks staff will have a green light to put together a financial package for future implementation. Chair Lovell asked if the consultant who creates the final park designs would be obligated to prepare design documents that are consistent with the Master Plans. Ms. Hite answered yes, but commented that the master plans are quite broad and design decisions will need to be made throughout the process. The City will go through a competitive bidding process for design consultants, and it is likely this effort will involve a citizen's committee, as well. Sometimes, the entity that created the schematic design is the one most qualified to do the final design work. For example, the current contract with Walker Massey for the Civic Field Master Plan also includes language for them to amend the contract to go into design development if the City so chooses. That was not the case with the Marina Beach Master Plan contract, since development of the park is three to five years out. Board Member Stewart requested clarification of the proposed amendment to Goal 4, Policy 4.H of the PROS Plan. Ms. Hite reviewed that when the Marina Beach Master Plan was created, numerous people voiced support for the dog park to remain as an element of the park. Goal 4 was added to the PROS Plan to address the concern about potential impacts to sensitive areas. Staff is suggesting the language be amended to make it more powerful and applicable to all parks in the City. The new language would read, "Ensure uses in environmentally sensitive areas are consistent with critical area regulations and the Shoreline Master Program." She summarized that the proposed language is intended to make the City pay attention to potential impacts in all design and develop a balance. Board Member Stewart asked for specific language in the Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) and Shoreline Master Program (SMP). Although she acknowledged that the dog park is well -loved by the community, the community must also be made aware of what is happening to the land as a result of the non -conforming use (dog park). Although dog owners do a good job of cleaning up their pets' feces, Keeley O'Connell, restoration biologist on contract with the City, previously pointed out to the Board that the urine is what completely decimates the marine flora on the shoreline. She said she has been a naturalist for years at Discovery Park where there is a diverse display of habitat, but less so on the Edmonds beaches. If you walk through Marina Beach Park, there is a noticeable wasteland effect as you walk through the dog park and habitat returns as you walk further south along the beach. As habitat improvements occur down the road and conversations and public education continues to evolve, people will become aware that there could be better alternatives. She said she hopes that this will be part of the conservation going forward, and she questioned if the proposed amendment to Goal 4 would provide adequate protection for the area. Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked if developing LOS standards for key public facilities would be a Planning Board responsibility. Mr. Chave answered yes, but only to the extent that they are included in the planning documents. Many of the standards are already in place, such as transportation. Mr. Chave advised that the draft amendments are scheduled for a public hearing before the Board on November 9t'. Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 9 Packet Pg. 289 8.1.f CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES September 28, 2016 Chair Lovell called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 5`' Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Philip Lovell, Chair Carreen Rubenkonig, Vice Chair Matthew Cheung Alicia Crank Nathan Monroe Valerie Stewart BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Todd Cloutier (excused) Daniel Robles (excused) READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Rob English, City Engineer Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Jerry Bevington, Video Recorder Karin Noyes, Recorder BOARD MEMBER STEWART MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 BE APPROVED AS CORRECTED. BOARD MEMBER MONROE SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There was no one in the audience. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Chair Lovell referred to Page 3, which contains a brief update on the Waterfront Access Study. He clarified that a second public meeting was recently held, and his understanding is that the Task Force will be making a recommendation to the City Council via Mayor Earling sometime in October. PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED 2017-2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) Mr. English started his presentation by providing a diagram to illustrate the components of the CIP and CFP, particularly noting differences between the two documents and where they overlap. He explained that both plans identify the six -year capital projects with funding sources, but the CIP also identifies six -year maintenance projects with funding sources and the Packet Pg. 290 8.1.f CFP identifies long-range (20 year) capital project needs. The CFP is divided into three project sections: General (parks, buildings and regional projects), Transportation (safety/capacity and pedestrian bicycle projects), and Utilities. The CIP is organized based on the City's financial funds and provides a description of each of the capital projects identified for the six - year period. He summarized that the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, linking those projects to the various City funds and revenues, and the CFP is intended to identify longer -term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City level -of -service standards. The CFP is also required to be consistent with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, (i.e. transportation, parks, etc.), and there are restrictions on how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP. He reviewed each of the funds as follows: • Fund 112 — Transportation. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 116 — Building Maintenance. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 125 — Capital Projects. This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation and Public Works Departments. Money for this fund comes from the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET), and the dollars are split between the two departments. • Fund 126 — Special Capital/Park Acquisition. This fund is supported by REET funds and is managed by the Parks and Recreation Department. • Fund 129 — Special Projects. This fund is currently idle and was last used for the Highway 99 International District Lighting Project that was completed a few years ago. Any new capital project would program into this fund. • Fund 132 — Parks Construction (Grant Funding). This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation Department. • Fund 421— Water Projects. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 422 — Storm Projects. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 423 — Waste Water Treatment Plant. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department. Next, Mr. English recapped some of the larger projects that have been completed or the City is working towards completion of in 2016: • The 228`h Street Corridor Improvement Project started in May of 2015 and reached substantial completion in March of 2016. The project included a new signalized intersection that connects 2281h Street east to west across Highway 99 and into Mountlake Terrace, providing a new east/west connection to Interstate 5. • Safety improvements were completed with a median down Highway 99 to eliminate the left turns from south bound Highway 99 to 76`h Avenue West. This should help reduce accidents and provide safety turning movements. • A sidewalk improvement project on 238th Street between 100th and 104`h Streets was completed via a Safe Routes to Schools Grant. Stormwater funds were used to improve drainage, including bio-retention rain gardens in key locations. The street was also overlaid using funds from the Pavement Restoration Program. • Sewer mains were replaced on Walnut Street, and the project also included new pavement via the Pavement Restoration Program. • On September 271h, the City Council approved a contract for a project on the south side of 2361h Street between SR-104 and Madrona School. The project will include a new sidewalk, with a five-foot path to cross over to school, and curbs and gutters will also be installed. The pavement is in poor condition, so the roadway will be rebuilt. The project will include stormwater and water main work, as well. The City is coordinating with the School District's plan to rebuild the school starting in 2017 to provide a sidewalk leading into the school property. • As part of the Pavement Preservation Program, 9.6 lane miles of roadway were repaved, and pedestrian curb ramp upgrades were completed. • REET dollars (125 and 126 Funds) were used to fund the 2016 Pavement Preservation Program, single cabinet upgrades, traffic calming program, curb ramp upgrades, and an ADA transition plan update. Mr. English reviewed the projects that will be funded in 2017 via the 112 Fund as follows: Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 2 Packet Pg. 291 8.1.f The 76th Avenue West and 212th Street Intersection Improvement Project was bid out in May. However, given the bidding climate, the bids came in much higher than the engineer's estimate. Only two bids were received and both were high. The City elected to reject both bids and rebid the project during the winter months. That means the project would likely start in the spring of 2017. In the meantime, the City has applied for additional grant funding from the Transportation Improvement Board, but won't know the outcome of the application until November. This large project will add capacity to the intersection and underground utilities. Chair Lovell pointed out that the project is identified in the CIP as being unfunded at this time. Mr. English said the City has secured federal funding for the project, and has applied for additional grant funding, as well. Chair Lovell referred to the spreadsheet on Page 9 and said it is unclear how much grant funding has been secured in 2016 and how much needs to be secured in 2017. Mr. English agreed to revisit the numbers and update them accordingly. He suggested that perhaps the labels needed to be corrected to more clearly reflect the intent. He said that in addition to grant funding for the project, additional funding will come from the water and storm utility funds, since infrastructure needs to be replaced in the intersection prior to pavement work being done. • Citywide bicycle improvements will continue in 2017. For example, a striping project will occur on 76th Avenue West to add bicycle lanes and change a four -lane facility into a 3-lane facility. This project will likely be bid in conjunction with the intersection improvements to get some economy. • The 238th Street Walkway Project from SR-104 to SR-99 will also be completed in 2017. The City received a grant from the State Transportation Improvement Board and design work has been started. • The City received federal funding to move forward with an overlay of 84th Avenue from 200th Street to 212th Street during the summer of 2017. • REET dollars will be used to install Trackside Warning Systems at Main and Dayton Streets to reduce the sound footprint that the current train horns have. The warning systems will be permanently installed at the intersections, and the horns will blow whenever a train is passing through Edmonds in either direction. The noise from the horns will be more focused at the intersections so there will be less impact to surrounding properties. Mr. English summarized that the Water Utility Fund (421) supported the replacement of 4,850 feet of water main in 2016, and 3,400 feet of street affected by waterline replacements was overlaid. In 2017 it is anticipated that 7,300 feet of water main will be replaced and 8,200 feet of street affected by waterline replacement will be overlaid. Mr. English also reviewed that the Stormwater Utility Fund (422) supported the 238th Street drainage improvements that were completed in 2016, as well as the new pipe and infiltration gallery in southwest Edmonds between 106th and 105th Street. The 2017 projects include the Seaview infiltration project, further design of the Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh project, an update of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan, and installation of the Dayton Street Pump Station. He explained that the Seaview project is funded via a grant and will help reduce the number of surges from stormwater flowing into Perrinville Creek. The Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh project is ongoing, and it is anticipated that final design work and permitting can move forward in 2017. He explained that during heavy rain events and high tide, the intersection at Dayton Street and SR- 104 floods. Given its proximity to the marsh, Willow Creek, the outfall, and the tide, the solution is complicated. As proposed, a lift station will be installed off of Dayton Street in the fishing pier parking lot as a first step to solve the flooding problems at the intersection. Lastly, Mr. English reviewed that in 2016 the Sewer Utility Fund (423) supported the replacement of 2,000 feet of sewer main and the rehabilitation of 6,400 feet of sewer main using the cured -in -place process (CIPP). In addition, it funded 1,075 of pavement overlay on streets affected by the sewer main replacement projects. It is anticipated that 2,900 feet of sewer main will be replaced in 2017, with 3,000 feet of CIPP rehabilitation and pavement overlay on 8,600 feet of street affected by sewer main replacement. A large wastewater treatment project is in process near the ferry holding lanes where the secondary clarifier is being replaced. The project should be completed in October. Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 3 Packet Pg. 292 8.1.f Chair Lovell asked if the Edmonds Waterfront Analysis relates to the work being done by the Railroad Crossing Task Force. Ms. Hite answered affirmatively. Chair Lovell asked why no funding has been set aside for this project in the next four years. Mr. English said there is still momentum to move a crossing project forward, and the task force will continue its work. The Mayor is currently working on the 2017 budget, which will be presented to the City Council in October. They will know more about funding after the draft budget has been released. In addition, the City has applied for some transportation grants to continue the work. At this point, it is too early to know if there will be funding for the project, and it was included in the CFP as a placeholder. Mr. English summarized that staff begins working on the CIP and CFP updates in July, and a preliminary draft is typically presented to the Planning Board in September. A public hearing on the CIP and CFP is scheduled for October 12' , after which the Board will forward a recommendation to the City Council. Updated documents will be provided at the hearing, including more detailed information to outline the differences between 2016 and 2017. Staff is scheduled to make an initial presentation to the City Council on October 18th, with a public hearing on November I". Using the Board's input and public comments, the City Council will discuss the draft documents and make revisions. It is anticipated that final adoption will occur in November or December. Once adopted, the CFP will be included as part of the next batch of Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Board Member Monroe requested more information about the Citywide Capital Renewal Program, which is listed on Page 11 of the CIP. Ms. Hite said this program is managed by the Facilities Division. She explained that, in years past, the program has had minimal funding, and many infrastructure renewal projects have been deferred. This year, Mayor Earling is proposing that a lump sum be set aside for doing renewal of the City's capital assets. The Capital Facilities Manager has prepared a list of needs, and the projects will be funded by the $1.5 million set aside for the Capital Renewal Program. The intent is to chip away at the projects each year. For example, there are numerous needs at the Frances Anderson Center that have been deferred from previous years. Board Member Stewart said she is excited to see the projects that have been accomplished during the year, as well as projects that will happen going forward. She asked if staff could provide the Board and City Council with a copy of the list of projects associated with the Capital Renewal Project. Ms. Hite agreed to provide the list as an attachment for the public hearing. Board Member Stewart asked if City staff works to coordinate infrastructure projects so they can be done simultaneously. For example, are sewer and water main replacements coordinated so they are completed before a street is overlaid. Mr. English answered affirmatively. Once a significant project has been identified, City staff inspects the condition of other elements, such as water and sewer mains. If needed, the pro�ects can be done simultaneously. For example, he referred to the Dayton Street Project that took place between P and 9 Avenues, which was initiated as a stormwater improvement. After doing a comprehensive review of the other utilities, the project was expanded to include water and sewer main improvements, as well. The project at the 212th Street intersection is another example of a combined project. It initially started as a transportation capacity project, but after evaluating the condition of the utilities, replacement of the sewer and stormwater mains were incorporated into the project. Board Member Stewart reviewed that frontage improvements, including sidewalks, are required for any new development in the City. She voiced concern that, sometimes the improvements that are made are torn up just a few years later to accommodate a City improvement project. She asked if it is possible for City staff to help developers anticipate the future improvements and perhaps postpone or defer the frontage improvements until the City's larger project moves forward. Mr. English said City staff has more control when it comes to coordinating City projects, but it is more difficult for private development. A good example is the 200th Street Overlay Project. A developer found out about the project via the notification process and the City worked with the developer to get the connections made to the City's systems before the overlay project moved forward. He said staff tries to coordinate city projects and development proposals through the building permit application. Ideally, the City can hold off on a project to allow a developer to get his/her work done, but he acknowledged that is not always the case. Board Member Stewart summarized that the City should do its part to help property owners by allowing them to postpone the improvements until they can be coordinated with larger, planned City projects. Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 4 Packet Pg. 293 8.1.f Board Member Stewart asked if Planning Board Members would have an opportunity to provide feedback relative to the fitness stations that are proposed for City parks. Ms. Hite answered that she would love to have feedback from the Board as the project moves forward. Board Member Stewart asked if funding for open space acquisition is included in the CIP. Ms. Hite answered that she programs $200,000 into each year's budget for open space acquisition. She agreed it is important to include this in the yearly discussions, and she will add it to her presentation for the public hearing. She said it would be helpful to have feedback from the Board as to whether they support rolling this funding over from year-to-year until an opportunity comes up. Board Member Stewart observed that, as land continues to be developed, the City should remain open to opportunities to acquire open space. Once land is developed, the opportunity will be lost. Board Member Cheung asked how the City prioritizes the capital improvement projects. Mr. English explained that, from a pavement preservation standpoint, staff evaluates the condition of the pavement each year and places a rating on the streets. They also try to coordinate the work with needed utility replacement projects. For example, a street overlay may be postponed if the City knows that a water or sewer main project will be needed in the near future so that the two projects can be coordinated and completed at the same time. As far as capital project prioritization, there is very limited funding, and the City typically uses grant opportunities as a way to prioritize these projects. First, they look at the prioritized list of projects in the 2015 Transportation Improvement Plan. As grant opportunities come up, staff selects the most competitive projects that fit the particular grant requirements. Typically, the transportation capital infrastructure budget is very small (between $140,000 and $150,000). Additional funding for capital projects comes from grants and from traffic impact fees. On the other hand, Mayor Earling has made pavement preservation a priority for the past few years. Board Member Cheung asked how citizens can recommend transportation improvement projects for inclusion in the Transportation Improvement Plan. Mr. English explained that, from a planning standpoint, staff uses the list that is included in the Transportation Improvement Plan, which an adopted element of the Comprehensive Plan. Adoption of the Transportation Improvement Plan included an extensive public process that allowed the public to identify projects they felt were most important. During the most recent update, a sidewalk committee was formed to evaluate each street and identify where sidewalks are needed. Citizens can contact the Public Works or Engineering Department to provide feedback on potential projects, and staff will evaluate the situation to determine what the appropriate solution might be. Vice Chair Rubenkonig added that the Police Department also takes note of situations were a high number of accidents are occurring. Board Member Crank said she appreciates the work that was done at the intersection of 228th Street and Highway 99. However, some people are questioning the design of the median, which appears to have benches where people can sit. Mr. English advised that the design was intended to provide relief to the median's appearance. There are a lot of design options to choose from, but it was felt that the concrete or grass median was not very aesthetically pleasing for this location. Given the speed of traffic along the corridor, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) also felt that the taller median was needed for safety reasons. The center section of the median has a colored concrete stamp that was intended to provide an aesthetic element to the median as opposed to a concrete covered center. Board Member Crank referred to the new flashing traffic signal that was installed at Edmonds Way and 232nd Street. She asked if the area is currently being monitored and if there has been an uptick in traffic volumes as a result of the new marijuana business and proposed new residential development. Mr. English agreed to looking into the issue and provide a better answer about traffic volumes at the public hearing. He recalled that the SR-104 Corridor Analysis that was recently completed looked at the entire corridor through Edmonds. It identified several recommendations for capital improvement projects to make the corridor more pedestrian friendly and safe. Board Member Crank asked if there have been any reports of traffic accidents associated with the newly installed Luminous Forest. Ms. Hite advised that the Police Department had some concerns when the it was first installed, and the artist advised that after the installation has been on for one month, the surface will become scratched and dim. She hasn't heard of any accidents on 4tb Avenue to date. Board Member Crank said she would love to see the community garden concept come to fruition. It would be a very attractive amenity for apartment dwellers. Ms. Hite agreed, but explained that the City has had a difficult time finding an appropriate location. It was originally planned for the south side of the Old Woodway High School site, but because of Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 5 Packet Pg. 294 8.1.f controversy surrounding the athletic fields, staff decided against pursuing that location. She expressed her belief that the park in Esperance would be good location for a community garden, and she will continue to work with Snohomish County to make that happen. Vice Chair Rubenkonig said she has had a long-standing concern about the intersection at 76th Avenue and 212th Street for a number of years. The last time the CIP was before the Board, she requested that the City consider placing an "all walk" crossing at this intersection. She lives in the area and is at the intersection often. It seems like an all walk would make it faster for the students to get across the road. She asked if this could be included in the 2016 CIP. Mr. English said the concept has been discussed by staff and it comes down to finding a balance between pedestrian safety and getting vehicles through the intersection. He agreed to talk to the Transportation Engineer to get more information about the concept and then report back to the Board at their next meeting. Chair Lovell observed that this is the first time that neither the CIP nor CFP identifies funding for the Edmonds Crossing Project. He assumes that staff will provide an explanation for this change and indicate whether the funds that were previously allocated would be used elsewhere. Mr. English said there have been no changes associated with the Edmonds Crossing Project. The project is currently identified as unknown based on WSDOT's current planning horizon for the multi - modal terminal, which is beyond 2035 or even 2040. Although the project is still included on WSDOT's list of future improvements, it remains unfunded, and the City does not know when funding will be allocated for it to move forward. When the capital plan for the ferry is updated in the future, the City may have more information about the project's timing. Chair Lovell commented that it is good to see that there are a lot of projects taking shape to meet the needs and cravings of the citizens. Things are moving towards the betterment of the City's infrastructure overall. He asked if there has been any interface between various City departments and the Tree Board, particularly in regard to street trees. The impact that some species of street trees can have on sidewalk infrastructure is becoming a big concern, as repair and/or replacement is often required. He noted that concern has also been raised about the types of trees that are planted at the Civic Center Field, which could end up blocking views. Ms. Hite said managing trees requires a joint effort, and the Parks, Planning and Public Works staff all work with the Tree Board, depending on the topic. Chair Lovell said he has heard that effort is being made to ensure that new trees are selected to be the right species, size and growth pattern to protect the City's infrastructure. Chair Lovell announced that a public hearing on the draft CIP and CFP is scheduled for October 12th. He encouraged Board Members to forward any outstanding questions directly to staff so they can be answered at the public hearing. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Chair Lovell reviewed the updated Extended Agenda, noting that a public hearing on the CIP and CFP is scheduled for October 12th. Staff will also present an update on the Comprehensive Plan Amendments pertaining to parks, Highway 99, street trees and water. On October 26th, the agenda will include a presentation on the University of Washington/Forterra Plan that was prepared for Five Corners, a discussion on the land use procedures code update, and an update on the Highway 99 Subarea Plan. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Lovell did not provide any additional comments. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Crank reported that she and Vice Chair Rubenkonig attended the City's Volunteer Dinner. Board Member Monroe reported on his attendance at the September 21st meeting of the Edmonds Citizens Economic Development Commission where they put together a list of recommendations related to the Civic Field Master Plan. Most of the recommendations were driven by economic development. For example, they want to see a playfield that can attract users who will presumably shop in downtown Edmonds. The list was presented to the City Council on September 27th. Planning Board Minutes September 28, 2016 Page 6 Packet Pg. 295 8.1.f CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES October 12, 2016 Chair Lovell called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 5`' Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Philip Lovell, Chair Carreen Rubenkonig, Vice Chair Matthew Cheung Alicia Crank Daniel Robles Valerie Stewart Malia Clark, Student Representative BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Nathan Monroe (excused) Todd Cloutier (excused) STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Rob English, City Engineer Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Jerry Bevington, Video Recorder Karin Noyes, Recorder Chair Lovell introduced Malia Clark, the Board's new Student Representative, who is a senior at Edmonds Woodway High School and also participates in the group, Students Saving Salmon. READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES Vice Chair Rubenkonig commented that the presentation and dialogue provided at the Board's last meeting by the City Engineer, Rob English, and the Parks, Recreational and Cultural Services Director, Carrie Hite, was well document in the minutes. They provided an excellent orientation to the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP). BOARD MEMBER CRANK MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 28, 2016 BE APPROVED AS PRESENTED. BOARD MEMBER STEWART SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS There was no one in the audience. Ms. Hite invited the Board Members to attend an open house on October 19"" from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. in the Library Plaza Room, where the hybrid plan for Civic Park Master Plan will be unveiled. After the plan has been presented, the public will be invited to provide feedback. An on-line open house will follow for two weeks to solicit additional public feedback. At Packet Pg. 296 8.1.f the close of the on-line open house, the hybrid design will be presented to the Planning Board for a public hearing and recommendation to the City Council. The City Council will also conduct a public hearing before making a final decision on the master plan design. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Chair Lovell referred the Board to the written report that was provided by the Development Services Director. He reported that he and Vice Chair Rubenkonig met recently with Mayor Earling and received an update on the Sustainable Cities Partnership, a collaboration between Western Washington University and the City of Edmonds. Mayor Earling advised that there is currently a lot of activity and the students are moving forward with the projects identified as part of the program. He spoke very positively about the experience thus far. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED 2017-2022 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) Chair Lovell reviewed the rules and procedures for the public hearing, which would start with a staff report by Mr. English and Ms. Hite. Mr. English started his presentation by providing a diagram to illustrate the components of the CIP and CFP, particularly noting the differences between the two documents and where they overlap. The CFP is a planning document that includes the 20-year projects and 6-year projects to address roads. The CIP identifies the short-term horizon projects that include both capital and maintenance projects over the next six years. The overlap is where the six -year capital projects relate to growth; these projects will be in both plans. The CFP is divided into three project sections: General (parks, buildings and regional projects), Transportation (safety/capacity and pedestrian bicycle projects), and Utilities. The CIP is organized based on the City's financial funds and provides a description of each of the capital projects identified for the six -year period. He reviewed each of the funds as follows: • Fund 112 — Transportation. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 116 — Building Maintenance. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 125 — Capital Projects. This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation and Public Works Departments. Money for this fund comes from the Real Estate Excise Tax (BEET), and the dollars are split between the two departments. • Fund 126 — Special Capital/Park Acquisition. This fund is supported by REET funds and is managed by the Parks and Recreation Department. • Fund 129 — Special Projects. This fund is currently idle and was last used for the Highway 99 International District Lighting Project that was completed a few years ago. Any new capital project would program into this fund. • Fund 132 — Parks Construction (Grant Funding). This fund is managed by the Parks and Recreation Department. • Fund 421— Water Projects. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 422 — Storm Projects. This fund is also managed by the Public Works Department. • Fund 423 — Waste Water Treatment Plant. This fund is managed by the Public Works Department. Next, Mr. English recapped some of the larger projects that have been completed or the City is working towards completion of in 2016: • The 228 h Street Corridor Improvement Project started in May of 2015 and reached substantial completion in March of 2016. The project included a new signalized intersection that connects 228th Street east to west across Highway 99 and into Mountlake Terrace, providing a new east/west connection to Interstate 5. • The 228`h Street Sidewalk Improvement Project connects 1001h Street to 104`h Street with sidewalks on the north side. This project was funded by a Safe Routes to Schools Grant. • The Pavement Restoration Program is a program that Mayor Earling has prioritized and funded for the fourth year in a row using Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenue from the 126 Fund. Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 2 Packet Pg. 297 8.1.f • A walkway project will start soon on 236 h Street, from SR-104 to Madrona School. This project will also be funded by a Safe Routes to Schools Grant. Mr. English reviewed some of the projects that will be funded in 2017: • The 76th Avenue West and 212th Street Intersection Improvement Project was bid out in May. However, given the bidding climate, the bids came in much higher than the engineer's estimate. The City elected to reject the bids and rebid the project during the winter months. That means the project would likely start in the spring of 2017. In the meantime, the City has applied for additional grant funding from the Transportation Improvement Board, but won't know the outcome of the application until November. • Citywide bicycle improvements will continue in 2017. For example, a striping project will occur on 76t' Avenue West in conjunction with the intersection improvements described above. As proposed, the roadway would change from four to three lanes, and a bicycle lane would be added. • The 238th Street Walkway Project from SR-104 to SR-99 will also be completed in 2017. The City received a grant from the State Transportation Improvement Board and design work has been started. • The City received federal funding to move forward with an overlay of 84th Avenue from 200th Street to 212th Street during the summer of 2017. • REET dollars will be used to install Trackside Warning Systems on Railroad Avenue at the Main and Dayton Street intersections to reduce the sound footprint that the current train horns have. The warning systems will be permanently installed at the intersections, and the horns will blow whenever a train is passing through Edmonds in either direction. The noise from the horns will be more focused at the intersections so there will be less impact to surrounding properties. Mr. English advised that, since the Board's last meeting, the Mayor approved his "decision package, which identifies projects that staff identified for 2017. The package includes: • Funding of $1.1 million for the Pavement Preservation Program, which is a critical piece of the City's ability to maintain infrastructure. • Funding for pre -design work for the access management on SR-99 between 2161h and 2241h Streets. The City has observed a higher accident problem along this stretch of roadway related to the two-way left turn lane on SR-99. The intent is to go forward with pre -design of the improvements in 2017. • In coordination with Mountlake Terrace, the City has applied for a grant to coordinate the signals on 2201h Street, which is badly needed. If the grant application is successful, the 2017 budget includes the matching funds to move the project forward. • $150,000 has been set aside to match grant dollars to continue to pursue alternatives for a waterfront at -grade crossing. The committee will present the results of their study to the Mayor soon, and a presentation will be made to the City Council in late October or early November. • The proposed 2017 budget includes funding to replace 7,300 feet of water main and 2,900 feet of sewer main. It also includes funding to rehabilitate 3,000 feet of sewer main. Ms. Hite reviewed the 2016 projects that were completed by the Parks and Recreation Department in 2016 as follows: • The City acquired the Civic Field property and is currently in the process of completing a master plan for its redevelopment. The consultant is working on a hybrid plan that will be unveiled at a public open house on October 19th Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 3 Packet Pg. 298 8.1.f • The spray park at City Park was opened in the spring and had a very successful summer. • The Dayton Street Plaza is nearly completed and it is already heavily used. They are currently in the last stages of landscaping. • The temporary art installation (Luminous Forest) on 4th Avenue was completed, and wayfinding signs were installed throughout the City. • The Marina Beach Park Master Plan was completed in early 2016, and the intent is to formally adopted the plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan before the end of the year. • The Fishing Pier Rehabilitation Project is nearing completion, and it expected to open with a ribbon -cutting ceremony on November 15''. • The Downtown Public Restroom Project is currently under construction near City Hall. • The Yost Spa Project is currently in progress. However, the project had to be redesigned in order to meet current code requirements. • The Frances Anderson Center Stage Replacement Project is currently in progress. • The design work for the Veteran's Project was completed. The City received two bids that were higher than the engineer's estimate, and the project is being rebid. • The playground equipment at Marina Beach Park has been replaced, and they are currently working to replace the equipment at the Meadowdale Preschool playground. Next, Ms. Hite reviewed the proposed 2017 projects as follows: • The Edmonds Marsh and Daylighting of Willow Creek Project is ongoing. The City has obtained grant funding to continue the feasibility study, and they have applied for other competitive grants, as well. • Parklet Projects will move forward in 2017, as will the Outdoor Fitness Zone Project • Gateway replacement is ongoing and in process. • The City is partnering with the City of Lynnwood to rehabilitate the Meadowdale Playfields. • The City's storage building burned down earlier in the year, and the City has received reimbursement from its insurance company. Considering the storage needs of both the Facilities and Parks and Recreation Departments, staff is proposing that the building be rebuilt to a size that is nearly 2.5 times larger but in the same location. • There is funding left from the state grant that was used to acquire Civic Field, and the City has received permission from the State to use the funds to demolish the grandstands. • Funding was set aside in the 2016 CIP for a community garden, and staff is working with Snohomish County regarding the possibility of partnering to create a community garden as Esperance Park. • The bids received for the Veteran's Plaza were rejected, and the City will go out to bid again soon. They expect to break ground in early 2017 and open the plaza in May of 2017. • The Senior Center is undertaking a capital program to redevelop the site into a Waterfront Center, and the City has discussed the opportunity to redevelop the waterfront at the same time. This will involve removing the existing creosote Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 4 Packet Pg. 299 8.1.f pilings, reconfiguring the park, adding a bioswale and raingardens to filter runoff from the parking lot before it goes into the Sound, adding a hand boat launch, providing more access to the beach, and adding a picnic area with a natural access to the senior center. In addition, the City is currently in discussions with the owners of the Ebb Tide Condominiums to complete the waterfront walkway in front of their building within the City's 10-foot easement. The City has applied for two $50,000 grants, and the project has scored high on both. The City has also set aside park impact fee dollars for the proj ect. • Land acquisition is a high priority in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan, and the proposed budget sets aside an additional $200,000 for this purpose. The intent is to having matching funds for grants available when opportunities to acquire land come about. Ms. Hite said staff is recommending that the Cultural Arts Facilities Needs Study be deleted from the CFP. While the study could still be done, it would be more of an operational project than a capital project. If a study determines that the City needs a facility at some point in the future, it can be added to the CFP. Also, the Downtown Restroom Project should be completed by the end of the year and can be removed from the 2017 CFP. Ms. Hite advised that, since the last meeting, the CIP was updated to highlight "land acquisition" as a goal. As requested by the Board at their last meeting, Mr. English provided a handout that lists the needs that were identified by the Capital Facilities Manager for the 2017 Citywide Capital Renewal Program. He explained that, in past years, the budget for capital facilities maintenance has been about $55,000. The Capital Facilities Manager requested that this amount be increased up to $400,000 to quick start the program of investing in and maintaining the City's existing facilities. The projects include roof repairs, painting, carpeting, seal coating, etc. Mr. English recalled that the Board also asked him to provide more information about traffic volumes on SR-104. He advised that the State does a number of traffic counts along the highway starting from the Ferry Terminal all the way to Interstate 5. While the 2016 counts are not available, the 2015 counts can be compared to previous years. The counts conclude that there was no increase in traffic volume from the ferry to 238th Street, but there was a small increase of 2% from 240th Street to Interstate 5. At their last meeting, Board Member Crank asked how new development along SR-104 might impact traffic volumes. He learned that the new development she referred to was actually permitted by Snohomish County so the City does not have any transportation data. However, it is likely that the development had very little impact to the overall traffic volumes on the highway. Mr. English recalled that, at their last meeting, Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked about the possibility of adding an "all -walk" phase at the intersection of 212th Street and 76th Avenue to provide a safer pedestrian access for high school students. He acknowledged that the concept has been used in select locations across the country, and it amounts to adding another phase to the signal timing that closes the movement of traffic on all four lanes of the intersection to allow pedestrians to cross. He explained that the City's current Level of Service (LOS) Standard for arterials is LOS D or better, and the proposed project would improve the intersection to LOS D. If an all -walk phase were added, the standard at the intersection would change to LOS E. He reminded the Board that the City secured a $3.96 million grant from the Congestion, Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Fund, and the purpose of the grant was to improve air quality by reducing emissions and congestion. As currently proposed, the intersection project would reduce emissions for carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon and oxides of nitrogen. The benefit of the project is that reducing congestion will bring down emissions and that is why the City received the funding. It would be difficult to change the project to add an all -walk phase because it would reduce the LOS standard and increase emissions. Staff is proposing that the project be constructed as currently designed. Mr. English summarized his presentation by reviewing that after the public hearing the Board will be asked to forward a recommendation to the City Council. The CIP and CFP, along with the Board's recommendation, will be presented to the City Council for a study session, followed by a public hearing on November 1st Chair Lovell opened the public portion of the hearing. However, there was no one in the audience, and the public portion of the hearing was subsequently closed. Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 5 Packet Pg. 300 8.1.f Board Member Crank asked if the overlay project on 84th Avenue between 220th Street and 2121h Street would take place while school is in session. Mr. English said that, if all goes well, the intent is to do the work during the summer when school is on break. Board Member Crank said she is glad to hear that the City's goal is to do the Waterfront Redevelopment Project in tandem with the Senior Center's Waterfront Center Project. She said she serves on the Senior Center Board, and the plan to talk about fundraising and strategies at their upcoming retreat. Board Member Crank referred to the funding set aside for land acquisition and asked if there are targeted properties the City is looking to acquire. Ms. Hite answered that the PROS Plan identifies areas of the City that are not as well served by parks and open space, and the City will look for opportunities to acquire additional land to serve these neighborhoods. In addition, the City is always looking for opportunities to acquire properties along Shell Creek and other properties that run parallel to the watersheds. However, the City must also consider the need to maintain the park space it already has. It requires a balancing act. Board Member Crank thanked Mr. English for providing data about traffic volumes on SR-104. She appreciates that data is needed to make a case for improvements, and she looks forward to comparing 2016 data to previous years to determine the impact of new development. She noted that, just tonight, the light stopped blinking because there was an emergency vehicle coming through the intersection. People are accustomed to the light blinking, and a car was almost hit when it did not stop at the light. She said she hopes new data will support the need for a study to see if mitigation is needed. Board Member Cheung asked if the Traffic Engineer's analysis of an all -walk phase at the intersection of 212`h Street and 76`h Avenue considered that the phase would only need to be activated during certain times of the day (when students arrive, when students leave, and when students go to lunch). Mr. English acknowledged that the phase could be timed to only activate during certain times of the day, but the morning period when students are arriving at school is also during the peak commute period. Board Member Cheung asked if LOS D could be maintained with an all -walk phase that only operate during certain times of the day as described above. Mr. English said more traffic modeling would be needed to answer that question. Vice Chair Rubenkonig commented that adding an all -walk phase at the intersection of 76th Avenue and 212`h Street would minimize the pedestrians' exposure to pollution. Mr. English agreed that is possible, but it would depend on when the pedestrian reaches the intersection. Depending on the phase of the light, a pedestrian may have to wait longer if an all -walk phase were added. He also voiced concern that students may get impatient waiting for the signal and cross against traffic. Chair Lovell asked if the Traffic Engineer has solicited feedback from the Edmonds School District relative to the proposed changes at the intersection of 76th Avenue and 212th Street. Mr. English answered that the City has worked closely with the school district to coordinate the phasing of the intersection improvements, and the school district has voiced support for the proposed changes. The district has not requested an all -walk phase. Ms. Clark said she uses the intersection at 76th Avenue and 212'h Street often, and it could use some work. She often has to wait about five minutes to cross the street, and she knows that some students become impatient and jay walk. Mr. English explained that, currently, the intersection lacks turning movement, which means it takes longer for cars and pedestrians to get through the sequence. With the proposed changes, the left turn lanes going north/south will go at the same time, which allows the light to cycle faster. The same would be done for the east/west lanes. Board Member Cheung asked if the intersection improvements would include left turns on a blinking light. Mr. English said they have not made a firm decision on this option because it could lead to conflicts with the high school. A left -turn arrow would hold up pedestrians. With a flashing yellow light for left turns, there is a potential that a student could be hit while using a crosswalk if a driver sees a break in traffic and initiates the turn. Staff will continue to evaluate the option, but his first thought is that it would not be appropriate in this location. Board Member Cheung asked if it would be possible to time the lights so that the flashing turn is available only when school is not in session. Mr. English agreed that is a possibility. Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 6 Packet Pg. 301 8.1.f Chair Lovell thanked Ms. Hite and Mr. English for providing responses to the issues and concerns raised by the Board at their last meeting. He asked that these responses also be conveyed to the City Council for consideration in their review of the CIP and CFP. Chair Lovell requested clarification on the funding that is currently available for the Veteran's Plaza. Ms. Hite answered that the City will contribute $30,000 to the project, and the remaining portion of the $550,000 cost will come from fundraising. Chair Lovell asked if the City is contemplating that work will start on the Waterfront Center and Waterfront Redevelopment Projects in 2017. Ms. Hite said the goal is to do the projects in tandem. However, it is possible that the Senior Center will not reach its funding goal in time to complete the project during the fish window, and the Waterfront Center Project will have to be postponed until 2018. Based on grant funding, it may be necessary for the City to move forward with the Waterfront Redevelopment Project in 2017. Again, she said the City's goal is to move the two projects forward in 2017, hoping that the Senior Center will be ready, as well. Board Member Crank advised that the Senior Center's target is to break ground on the project in September of 2017. Ms. Hite emphasized that there is a fish window that limits when waterfront development can occur, and it happens to be during the summer months. Ms. Crank said the Senior Center Board's goal is to meet that window. Board Member Robles asked for clarification of the small boat launch that is proposed as part of the waterfront redevelopment project. Ms. Hite said this would be a hand launch facility that is not meant for large boats. She referred to the proposed design of the project and noted the location of the boat launch. She explained that the ramp would serve a dual purpose for launching small watercraft (kayaks, paddleboards, etc.) and providing Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access. Board Member Stewart referred to Page 150 of the Staff Report that describes the Edmonds Marsh Feasibility and Restoration/Walkway Project, which is estimated to cost $155,000. She asked if the project would include a new walkway around the marsh. Ms. Hite said the project includes restoration of the current walkway, which is queued up for 2017. However, the work done by the Western Washington University Students as part of the Sustainable Cities Project will include consideration of a boardwalk all the way around the marsh. Several community citizens have volunteered to participate on a focus group to discuss the concept further. Board Member Stewart asked if the walkway that is proposed in front of the Ebb Tide Condominiums would be ADA accessible. Ms. Hite answered that there would be two sections of stairs to provide broader accessibility, but the boardwalk would all be accessible. The boardwalk proposed in front of the Ebb Tide Condominiums would connect the north and south portions of the existing boardwalk together. Board Member Stewart noted that there are redundancies in the CIP, as some projects appear to be listed twice, and the dollar amounts do not match up. Ms. Hite said the redundancy has to do with the different funds that are used for the projects. In many cases, funding will come from a variety of sources and/or funds. Board Member Stewart said she is glad that the documents identify certain properties the City is keeping an eye on for park acquisition. There is forest land in the northern portion of the City that has been on and off the market for quite some time and is part of the Perrinville Creek Drainage Basin. There is a real desire in the neighborhood for the City to acquire this property, and it can only happen if funding is available. She suggested that the City allocate a significantly larger amount in 2017 to allow the City to competitively bid for the property. Ms. Hite commented that this would be difficult. She explained that Mayor Earling weighs out all of the priorities for the City and attempts to balance all needs when allocating the REET dollars in the 126 Fund. For example, the 126 Fund is also used to support the Street Preservation and Facilities Restoration Programs, which both have a backlog of projects. In addition to acquiring more park and open space, it is also important for the City to adequately maintain their existing properties. However, she agreed to make note of Board Member Stewart's request when presenting the CIP and CFP to the City Council. Board Member Stewart commented that the City could establish a donor program to provide funding support for future park and open space acquisition. Ms. Hite agreed and said that she has been working with Council Member Mesaros to pursue this option further. Board Member Stewart agreed to assist in the effort. Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 7 Packet Pg. 302 8.1.f Vice Chair Rubenkonig requested clarification relative to the schedule for the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project, which is described on Page 58 of the Staff Report. Mr. English reviewed that staff provided a report to the City Council in August relative to the concept of building a walkway on the west side of Sunset Avenue. Currently, there is temporary striping that designates a walkway area, but there has been quite a lot of discussion about where the parking should be located, what kind of parking should be provided, etc. Parallel with the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project is a utility improvement project. The City is considering options for improving the lift station on Sunset Avenue south of Caspers Street to install a new gravity line to take sewage to the treatment plant rather than having to pump it. A waterline also needs to be replaced. No permanent walkway or designated parking would be constructed until after the utility work has been completed in 2017. He agreed to clarify the schedule in the project description. Vice Chair Rubenkonig observed that the proposed sidewalk project on 232nd Street SW from 100th Avenue W to SR-104 (Page 60 of the Staff Report) would provide the fastest walking route to Westgate from the intersection with SR-104, and the City should encourage people to use it as such. She also suggested that the CIP and CFP should include a listing of the sources recommending action to help citizens know how long a project has been in the making, and the embedded vicinity maps may be easier to navigate if compass points were included. While providing footage of the sidewalk projects has begun, it could be completed, and highlighting project areas could assist the reader in identifying the size and location of the proposed work. Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked for clarification about the Pine Ridge Forest Management Study, which is described on Page 105 of the Staff Report. In particular, she asked if the City has done similar studies for other parks in the past. Ms. Hite explained that the Public Works, Planning and Parks Departments are coordinating an effort to complete an Urban Forestry Management Plan for the entire City in 2016 and 2017, but there are a lot of older trees in Pine Ridge Park that warrant an evaluation to assess the City's liability, etc. Chair Rubenkonig pointed out that the acronym WWTP (Page 117 of the Staff Report) should be spelled out as the Waste Water Treatment Plant. She also referred to the Table that lists the publicly -owned facilities in Edmonds and other nearby areas and suggested that the Civic Center Playfield should be removed from the list of school district properties and added to the list of City -owned properties. VICE CHAIR RUBENKONIG MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) AND CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) FOR 2016 THROUGH 2O22 TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL BASED ON THE COMMENTS PROVIDED BY THE BOARD. BOARD MEMBER STEWART SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. THE BOARD RECESSED THE MEETING FOR A FIVE-MINUTE BREAK AT 8:20 P.M. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:27 P.M. 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Mr. Chave reviewed that the most recent Comprehensive Plan update was completed in 2015, and included a major review as required by the Growth Management Act. Typically, the City undertakes relatively minor amendments in intervening years. This year's amendments will include the following: Amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated CFP. Amending the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan to include the adopted Marina Beach Master Plan as a new "Appendix D." Appendix A would also be amended to acknowledge and reflect the Marina Beach Master Plan. Amending the Capital Facilities Element to add an implementation action that would read, "Develop level of service standards for key public facilities by the end of 2017 and consider including the standards in the Comprehensive Plan." In addition to the amendments listed above, Mr. Chave advised that two more substantial amendments are currently being developed: The Water Comprehensive Plan and the Street Tree Plan. Drafts of each of the plans are due before the end of Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 8 Packet Pg. 303 8.1.f 2016, and approval is scheduled for the first quarter of 2017. Any specific references to the current plans will need to be updated, as well. The two plans will be ready for the Planning Board's consideration after the first of the year. Mr. Chave summarized that the Board has completed its public hearing and recommendation to the City Council relative to Amendment 1, and the public hearings for Amendments 2 and 3 are scheduled for November 9"h. Chair Lovell asked if the City plans to hire a consultant to assist staff in preparing an Urban Forestry Management Plan. Mr. Chave answered affirmatively and noted that funding has been allocated for the project, and staff is working on a Request for Proposals. However, the Street Tree Plan is separate and will precede the Urban Forestry Management Plan. Chair Lovell said his understanding is that the Marina Beach and Civic Field Master Plans, once adopted into the Comprehensive Plan, will represent what the community wants programmatically for the two sites, but they should not be considered final designs. Ms. Hite agreed that the master plans should not be considered design or construction documents. Instead, they are schematic designs that represent the community's thoughts and desires. It is always good practice to officially adopt the master plans into the Comprehensive Plan so there are no questions about the process. Once adopted into the Comprehensive Plan, Parks staff will have a green light to put together a financial package for future implementation. Chair Lovell asked if the consultant who creates the final park designs would be obligated to prepare design documents that are consistent with the Master Plans. Ms. Hite answered yes, but commented that the master plans are quite broad and design decisions will need to be made throughout the process. The City will go through a competitive bidding process for design consultants, and it is likely this effort will involve a citizen's committee, as well. Sometimes, the entity that created the schematic design is the one most qualified to do the final design work. For example, the current contract with Walker Massey for the Civic Field Master Plan also includes language for them to amend the contract to go into design development if the City so chooses. That was not the case with the Marina Beach Master Plan contract, since development of the park is three to five years out. Board Member Stewart requested clarification of the proposed amendment to Goal 4, Policy 4.H of the PROS Plan. Ms. Hite reviewed that when the Marina Beach Master Plan was created, numerous people voiced support for the dog park to remain as an element of the park. Goal 4 was added to the PROS Plan to address the concern about potential impacts to sensitive areas. Staff is suggesting the language be amended to make it more powerful and applicable to all parks in the City. The new language would read, "Ensure uses in environmentally sensitive areas are consistent with critical area regulations and the Shoreline Master Program." She summarized that the proposed language is intended to make the City pay attention to potential impacts in all design and develop a balance. Board Member Stewart asked for specific language in the Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) and Shoreline Master Program (SMP). Although she acknowledged that the dog park is well -loved by the community, the community must also be made aware of what is happening to the land as a result of the non -conforming use (dog park). Although dog owners do a good job of cleaning up their pets' feces, Keeley O'Connell, restoration biologist on contract with the City, previously pointed out to the Board that the urine is what completely decimates the marine flora on the shoreline. She said she has been a naturalist for years at Discovery Park where there is a diverse display of habitat, but less so on the Edmonds beaches. If you walk through Marina Beach Park, there is a noticeable wasteland effect as you walk through the dog park and habitat returns as you walk further south along the beach. As habitat improvements occur down the road and conversations and public education continues to evolve, people will become aware that there could be better alternatives. She said she hopes that this will be part of the conservation going forward, and she questioned if the proposed amendment to Goal 4 would provide adequate protection for the area. Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked if developing LOS standards for key public facilities would be a Planning Board responsibility. Mr. Chave answered yes, but only to the extent that they are included in the planning documents. Many of the standards are already in place, such as transportation. Mr. Chave advised that the draft amendments are scheduled for a public hearing before the Board on November 9t'. Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 9 Packet Pg. 304 8.1.f REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA Chair Lovell reviewed that the Board's October 26th agenda includes an update by the consultant on the Highway 99 Subarea Plan and a presentation by representatives from Sound Transit relative to the Sound Transit 3 initiative that will be on the November ballot. The November 9"b agenda will include a public hearing on the Civic Center Master Plan and a Public Hearing on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan amendments. The November 23`d meeting has been cancelled. The December 14th meeting tentatively includes a public hearing on the Highway 99 Subarea Plan, as well as election of officers and a presentation of the Five Corners Plan that was prepared by students from the University of Washington and Forterra. The December 28th meeting has been cancelled. Chair Lovell reported that he and Vice Chair Rubenkonig met with Mayor Earling recently and learned that the terms of four Board Members will expire at the end of 2016. Board Members who want to be reappointed for another term should notify the Mayor as soon as possible. After further discussion, Chair Lovell indicated he would notify the Mayor that he and Board Members Crank and Rubenkonig want to be reappointed for another term, but Board Member Stewart does not. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Lovell did not provide any additional comments. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Stewart announced that Students Saving Salmon will be meeting with stream -side property owners and residents on Saturday, October 15th, to discuss how they can improve conditions along the waterways for salmon habitat. They will be asking if salmon has been spotted and help them understand how to identify them and become more vigilant. The students will report their findings to the press and City Council in a timely manner. Board Member Robles gave a shout out to Perrinville, which now has an anchor restaurant and no franchise businesses. All of the businesses are community based, and the area is very well done. Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked if the fitness station that is located in the plaza/garden of the Waste Water Treatment Center is an example of the proposed new fitness zones. Ms. Hite said the fitness station at the plaza/garden only has three elements, and the proposed new fitness zones will have eight to ten components that will be more dynamic and have various functions. She recalled that Board Members Monroe and Stewart agreed to work with staff to select the fitness zone components. Vice Chair Rubenkonig announced that there will be an open house regarding the Highway 99 Subarea Plan on November 10`h from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. on the 4`' Floor at Swedish Hospital, and Chair Lovell indicated his plan to attend. She also reminded the Board of the public open house relative to the Civic Center Master Plan that is scheduled for October 19th from 6:00 to 7:30 p.m. in the Library Plaza Room. Board Member Crank indicated her plan to attend that event. Lastly, she advised that on November 2"d, the City Attorney will provide training to the Architectural Design Board regarding quasi- judicial meetings, etc. She suggested that those who missed the training that was provided previously to the Board should consider attending the November 2nd meeting. Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked Mr. Chave to explain the impact of the City Council's recent decision to establish a larger buffer for the Edmonds Marsh than what was recommended by the Department of Ecology (DOE). Mr. Chave explained that, in general, the Planning Board's recommendation relative to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP) was passed on to the DOE for review. However, the Council approved greater buffers for critical areas. The DOE notified the City that they did not like a few things in the Council approved SMP, including the increased buffer requirement, and they provided a list of mandatory and recommended changes. Most recently, the City Council walked through the DOE's recommendations and requirements and suggested some alternative versions. The alternatives will be presented back to the DOE, and the City will await a response that identifies where the discrepancies lie. Vice Chair Rubenkonig asked if the higher buffer requirement is unusual compared to other jurisdictions. Mr. Chave answered that the buffer requirement is not necessarily unusual, but the length of time the City has spent going back and forth with the DOE is a big unusual. He said he suspects the issue will eventually end up before the Growth Hearings Board. Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 10 Packet Pg. 305 8.1.f Board Member Crank reported on her attendance at the recent Candidates Forum that was sponsored by the Chamber. One of the questions given to the state candidates was about ST3, and their response helped feed her a perspective for the next round of discussions. Board Member Crank said she listened to the October l lth City Council meeting where there was significant input from downtown business owners about the recent sign code amendments. She voiced concern that the issue seems to be focused on a -frame signs, and the Board's recommendation that the City consider a directional sign program has gotten lost in the translation. This has created a lot of discord from downtown business owners. She asked what the Board could do to clarify the amendments. Mr. Chave answered that the City Council will do something to address the concern, and there is nothing the Board can do at this time. However, they will likely become involved at some point in the future. He encouraged Board Members to take every opportunity to talk to the downtown business owners and provide more information about the Board's recommendation. ADJOURNMENT The Board meeting was adjourned at 8:58 p.m. Planning Board Minutes October 12, 2016 Page 11 Packet Pg. 306 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement (45 min.) Staff Lead: City Attorney, Jeff Taraday Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Scott James Background/History The City of Edmonds had its own fire department for approximately 105 years when the city council voted on November 2, 2009 to enter into a long-term interlocal agreement (ILA) with Snohomish County Fire District 1 (FD1) to provide fire and emergency medical services to the city. A copy of the ILA is attached to this memo as Attachment A. FD1 began providing that service on January 1, 2010. The Woodway Issue: For the first four years of the contract (2010-2013), FD1 also provided fire and EMS service to Woodway under a contract. The ILA between FD1 and Edmonds allocated the cost responsibilities for staffing fire stations 16, 17, and 20 (the Edmonds stations) as follows: Edmonds = 77.79% FD1 (because Esperance is within FD1's taxing district) = 13.08% Woodway = 9.13% Woodway, however, was not a party to the City's contract with FD1. So, the Woodway portion of the above cost allocation might have been more of an assumption or aspiration than a reality. On January 1, 2014, Woodway stopped contracting with FD1 and began contracting with the Shoreline Fire District. Woodway's switch to Shoreline created the prospect of a long-term financial deficit for the fire district's operation of the Edmonds stations. That condition persists today, almost three years after Woodway terminated its relationship with FD1. If the present staffing levels were to be continued into 2017, Woodway's missing share of the cost of operating the Edmonds stations would be $706,266 in 2017 alone. Woodway's absence did not result in any layoffs or cost reductions. And Edmonds continued to pay 77.79% as it had originally agreed to pay. This left the fire district responsible for 22.21% of the cost of operating the Edmonds stations. On July 22, 2016, the fire district board adopted by motion a policy "to seek through negotiation of the cost associated with the operations of all contract city fire stations." The district cannot unilaterally change the 77.79% allocation of the costs to Edmonds. But we interpret the board's motion to indicate that the current arrangement is not sustainable and that the ILA would likely be terminated if the City refused to negotiate a different cost allocation. The district is willing to allocate all of the tax revenue that it collects from Esperance ($1,117,920 in 2017) to the operation of the Edmonds stations. If Edmonds takes responsibility for the remainder while also adopting the proposed service changes, Edmonds' allocation of the cost of operating the Edmonds stations would 83.06%. If Edmonds takes responsibility for the remainder but does not make any changes to the service, Edmonds' allocation of the cost of operating the Edmonds stations would be 85.55%. The Retroactive Invoice Issue: In August of 2014, having recently executed a collective bargaining agreement with the firefighters union, IAFF local 1828, the District sent the City of Edmonds a $1.67 million invoice for retroactive labor costs under the new CBA. The invoice was retroactive to January 1, Packet Pg. 307 8.2 2013. The invoice caused some controversy. And that controversy caused the City to take a close look at its ILA with FD1. The city council ultimate agreed to pay the invoice on January 27, 2015. Fitch & Associates Analysis: As part of its effort to thoroughly analyze the FD1 ILA, the City engaged Fitch & Associates to review the service provided by the District and suggest area where the City might want to make changes. Steve Knight from Fitch & Associates made a presentation to the city council on February 23, 2016. The presentation and discussion lasted for about 50 minutes. It may be worthwhile to review the video of that item in advance of the upcoming meeting. Fitch & Associates also prepared an executive summary and data report which were completed in April 2016. Those reports are attached to this agenda memo as Attachments B and C, respectively. Among various recommendations, Fitch analyzed the status quo as well as several options that the City could consider in determining whether to make changes to the status quo. Even though the City now contracts with a larger fire district for service, because the City's costs are based on the staffing levels at stations 16, 17, and 20, the alternatives really only address those stations. All positions are staffed on a 24/7 basis unless expressly noted otherwise. Status Quo Staffing 0 3 firefighters at each station; 0 2 paramedics at station 17 only; § Total paramedics on duty citywide = 2 Alternative 1 0 3 firefighters at each station; 0 2 paramedics at station 17 only - 12 hour peak shift only; § Total paramedics on duty citywide = 2 or 0, depending on time of day Alternative 2 0 3 firefighters at each station; 0 1 paramedic at each station (1 of the 3 firefighters) § Total paramedics on duty citywide = 3 Alternative 3 o 3 firefighters at two stations only 2 paramedics at one station § Total paramedics on duty citywide = 2 Terms of the Proposed ILA: The mayor has selected Alternative 2 as his proposed alternative and the proposed ILA reflects this preference. Alternative 2 has several advantages over the other alternatives including the status quo. Alternative 2 employs more paramedics than any of the other alternatives, including the status quo. It also distributes them geographically throughout the city by assigning one paramedic to each station instead of having all the paramedics operate out of station 17. This should allow at least one paramedic to respond more quickly to 911 calls by reducing travel time to the incident. Alternative 2 also saves the city a significant amount of money compared to the status quo. The 2017 cost of Alternative 2 is $7,427,818. The status quo would cost an additional $1,361,275. Key Deal Points of the ILA: In addition to the staffing mix discussed above, we have highlighted below, several deal points that we find significant about the proposed ILA. The complete ILA is set forth in Attachment D. Note that the language of the ILA is still being refined and none of these deals points should be considered approved by either party at this point. Woodway (see Section 14): Because the city is essentially being asked to absorb the 9.13% that the parties had hoped would be paid by Woodway, the district is agreeing to allow the city to subcontract the district's services to Woodway in hopes of the city being able to recoup some of that lost revenue at some point in the future. Packet Pg. 308 8.2 Negotiation Thresholds (see Section 2.2.1): It is anticipated that call volume will eventually increase to the point where it may become necessary to add service or make other changes. For that reason, the parties have agreed upon three metrics that the parties will monitor on an ongoing basis, any one of which would trigger a new round of negotiations when the metric exceeds the threshold set forth in the agreement. The metrics have been named Unit Utilization Factor (UUF); Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor (NUUF); and Transport Balance Factor (TBF). Each of these is defined in the definitions section of the ILA with a mathematical calculation. Out of Balance Transport Fees (see Section 2.2.1.3 and definitions): This provides a mechanism where a portion of the transport fees collected by the District are withheld pending subsequent reconciliation. If the number of transports cannot be brought within balance, the jurisdiction responsible for performing a disproportionate share of uncompensated transports would be entitled to receive some of the withheld transport fees. Esperance Offset (see Sections 4.5, 4.6, and definitions): The parties were not able to identify the source or methodology behind the 13.08% cost share that was allocated to FD1 for service of Esperance. Instead of continuing to use what now seems like an arbitrary percentage, the ILA contemplates simply that all the FD1 tax revenue from Esperance would be allocated to offset the cost to Edmonds of operating the Edmonds stations. City Retains Authority to Set Level of Service (see Sections 2.2.2 and 18): Language has been added to clarify that the City always retains the legislative discretion to establish the level of service for Edmonds. Turnout Time (see Section 2.4.1): The City will continue to pursue improvements in turnout time. While the District does not commit to making improvements in turnout time, it does commit to understanding what prevents it from making improvements. Retroactive Invoices (see Section 4.2.2): The City will receive timely invoices even in years for which the CBA has not yet been finalized, in which case the invoices will set forth reliable estimates of the eventual Contract Payment. This will allow the City to set money aside and plan for the forthcoming retroactive invoices. Attachments: A - Existing ILA with FD1 B - Fitch & Associates Executive Summary C - Fitch & Associates Data Report D - Proposed ILA with FD1 E - Proposed Exhibit C (corresponds with Alternative 2) F - Not Proposed Exhibit C (corresponds with Status Quo) Staff Recommendation We recommend the following process for this item: 1) After hearing presentation about proposed amended ILA with FD1; 2) Open Public Hearing and hear public testimony regarding same (30 minutes). Narrative <Type or insert text here> Attachments: Contract Original 2010 Fitch Executive Summary Report Fitch —Data —Report Contract Original 2010 Attachments Packet Pg. 309 8.2 2016-12-02 Revised ILA Proposed Exhibit C (corresponds with Alternative 2) Not Proposed Exhibit C (corresponds with Status Quo) Packet Pg. 310 8.2.a 1 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT by and between SNOHOMISH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1, a Washington municipal corporation (the "District") and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington city (the "City") is for the provision of fire and emergency medical services (EMS). L WHEREAS, a consolidated Fire and EMS service, by a single vendor or through a a Regional Fire Protection Service Authority (RFA), has recently gained support of most c elected officials in Southwest Snohomish County; WHEREAS, the City and District agree that a long-term agreement between the City and the District for fire and emergency medical services is beneficial to the City and District and their stakeholders; and N WHEREAS, the City and District have a long-term relationship for providing Mutual and Automatic Aid toward the delivery of fire and emergency medical service; and WHEREAS, the City desires to contract with the District to provide fire and emergency medical services to the City and the District desires to so provide these services; and WHEREAS, the District and the City are authorized, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, to enter into Interlocal Agreements which allow the District and the City to cooperate with each other to provide high quality services to the public in the most efficient manner possible. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the City and District hereto agree as follows: Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 1 of 21 November 2, 2009 ® SJ "7 -a2,o/a -/v de-70, Packet Pg. 311 8.2.a 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 Services Provided. The District shall provide all services necessary for fire suppression, emergency medical service, hazardous materials response, technical rescue, and disaster response to a service area covering the corporate limits of the City of Edmonds as are provided by the City of Edmonds. In addition, the District shall provide support services including, but not limited to, fire marshal, fire prevention and life safety, public education, public information, and fleet maintenance, payroll and finances, human resources, and legal and risk management pertaining to the operations and delivery of fire department services. 1.2 Training, Education, and Career Development. The District will provide training and education to all firefighter and emergency medical service personnel in accordance with State, County and local requirements. Furthermore, the District will offer professional development and educational and training opportunities for unrepresented and civilian employees. 1.3 _City Fire Chief. The District's Fire Chief shall be designated the City Fire Chief for purposes of statutory provisions, regulations and the Edmonds City Code. 1.4 District Fire Chief Desi Hates Fire Marshal. The District Fire Chief shall designate an individual to serve as City Fire Marshal, and shall assign necessary personnel to support the functions and needs of the Fire Marshal as mutually agreed to and partially funded by the City (See Exhibit A), 2. STANDARDS FOR SERVICES/STAFFING 2.1 Battalion Chief. The City Battalion Chief unit shall be staffed with a minimum of one (1) Battalion Chief twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week. The District agrees to provide Incident Command response for all emergency incidents twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week. 2.2 Fire Station Staffing. Fire Station 16 shall be staffed twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week with a minimum of one (1) fire captain and two (2) firefighter/emergency medical technicians or firefighter/paramedics. Fire Station 17 shall be staffed twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week with a minimum of one (1) fire captain, and two (2) firefighter/emergency medical technicians or firefighter/paramedics. Fire Station 20 shall be staffed twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week with a minimum of one (1) fire captain and two (2) firefighter/emergency medical technicians or firefighter/paramedics. 2.3 Paramedic unit. The City Medic unit wm b-e sta ffea witn a rniniiiiurn o firefighter/paramedics as currently provided. Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 2 of 21 November 2, 2009 0 0 N R C- T L 0 0 U c E 0 a Packet Pg. 312 8.2.a 2.4 Level of Service. The District shall provide the same level of service as currently provided by the City, which is consistent with the City response objectives per the City's Chapter 35.103 RCW Fire Department Compliance Plan (previously SHB Compliance Plan 1756) approved by the Edmonds City Council on November 28, 2006. If these response objectives are amended to provide an increased level of service, the District will make reasonable efforts to meet them, provided that funding is adequate. 2.5 Annual Reporting. The District agrees to annually report to the City in accordance with the City's RCW 35.103 Fire Department Compliance Plan. 2.6 Staffing Exceptions. Exceptions to on duty staffing levels may occur in unusual circumstances such as where there is a significant emergency event(s) in the District, the City, or other areas which are under a contract for service or auto/mutual aid agreement with the District. Unusual circumstances and significant emergencies that affect personnel, equipment, infrastructure and/or may include, but are not limited to, natural or man-made disasters, a significant incident, or series of escalating incidents significant to a specific location, multiple locations, and/or with area or region -wide impact. 2.7 Criteria -Based 9-1-1 Dispatch. It is understood and agreed by the City and District that the dispatch of units during emergencies is determined by criteria - based dispatch protocols of the dispatch centers, and automatic and/or mutual aid agreements. Nothing herein shall require the District to respond first within the City as opposed to other areas served by the District. The City and District recognize that responses to emergencies shall be determined by the District based upon dispatch protocols, the District's operational judgment, and without regard to where the emergencies occur. 2.8 Level of Service Changes. During the term of this Agreement, service level changes may be mandated that are beyond the control of either party. Additionally, either party may desire to change the service level, including but not limited to, those services identified in Section 1 Scope of Services and Section 2 Standards for Services/Staffing. When a service level change is mandated by law, adopted by the Edmonds City Council as the City's response objectives as required by RCW 35.103, or is mutually agreed to by the parties, the City and the District will renegotiate the contract payment at the request of either party. Provided that before renegotiation, the District must notify the Union, IAFF 1997, of the alleged change requiring a change in the level of service and thereafter negotiate with the Union the impact/affects of such change on the terms and conditions of employment of bargaining unit personnel. 2.9 Response Time Questions. In the event that response times should consistently exceed the current level of City services, the District Fire Chief and City Mayor, or their designees, shall meet and confer to address the cause and potential remedies. In no circumstance will a meet and Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 3 of 21 November 2, 2009 0 0 N 76 c T L. 0 U L 0 U c a� E 0 a Packet Pg. 313 8.2.a confer process be prejudicial to the rights of the parties under this agreement, or upon the Union, IAFF 1997, to bargain any and all impacts/effects relating to any remedy incident to the increased response time. 3. USE OF CITY FIRE STATIONS 3.1 Use of City Fire Stations. The City shall retain ownership of existing City fire c a� E a� _ stations. The City shall provide three City fire stations or replacement fire stations 2 for use by the District during the term of this Agreement and as described in im a Exhibit B. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Agreement and Exhibit B, the provisions of Exhibit B shall control with respect to fire stations and G L fixtures contained therein. 3.2 Fire Station Furnishings. The District shall make a one-time, lump sum purchase of fire station furnishings that are not built-in or fixed, and consumable and disposable supplies within 30 days after the Commencement Date of this T Agreement. The District shall accept ownership of furnishings that are not built-in or fixed in "as is" condition but only if the individual furnishing or ensemble are in U_ a condition acceptable to the District. 3.3 Purchase Price. The purchase price for furnishings that are not built-in or fixed `o was determined by applying a 15-year depreciation schedule to the estimated purchase prices of individual furnishings or ensembles. The purchase price for the estimated consumable and disposable supplies that will be in the fire stations x on the Commencement Date of this Agreement is based on the acquisition price. The purchase price for furnishings that are not built-in or fixed with appropriate a depreciation applied, and the price of consumable and disposable supplies is identified in Exhibit J. 4. ANNUAL CONTRACT AND TRANSPORT FEES PAYMENT TERMS v 4.1 Annual Contract Payment. The City shall annually pay the District a sum referred to as the Contract Payment for the services provided herein. The amount of the Contract Payment shall be determined according to Exhibit C. The Contract Payment shall be paid in equal quarterly installments by January 15, April 15, July 15 and September 15. Failure to pay quarterly installments in a timely manner shall be considered a material breach as defined in the Definitions section of this Agreement. 4.2 Contract Payment Adjustment. The Contract Payment shall be adjusted each year no later than September 1. 4.3 Annual Percent Increase Based on Labor Costs. The District shall submit to the City an annual revision to Exhibit C of this Agreement, which shall identify the Contract Payment for the ensuing year(s). The cost of City Station Personnel identified in Exhibit C shall be adjusted as changes occur by the percentage Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 4 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 314 8.2.a increase in labor costs resulting from the negotiated labor agreement between the District and IAFF Local 1997; provided that the personnel cost shall increase from one labor agreement to the next no more than the greater of (i) the median increase in compensation of comparable fire agencies, (ii) the increase in the Consumer Price Index as measured by the CPI-W Seattle -Tacoma -Bremerton metropolitan area for the 12-month period ending June 30, or (iii) the percentage increase in compensation awarded by an interest arbitrator. The phrase "comparable fire agencies" shall refer to a list of comparables agreed upon by the E Employer and Union through the collective bargaining process or the i comparables accepted by an interest arbitrator in an interest arbitration a proceeding. 0 4.4 Adjustment Date Not Met. If the labor agreement between the District and IAFF Local 1997 has not been finalized by December 31 of the year prior to the upcoming contract for service year, the District Station Personnel costs and the District Indirect Costs will be adjusted upon execution of the labor agreement but will be retroactive to January 1 and paid by the City within 30 days of execution o of the labor agreement. 4.5 Annual Indirect Operating Cost Adjustments. The District shall adjust the Contract Payment costs consisting of Indirect Operating Costs determined by the following: • Overhead which shall be 10 percent of the cost of the City Station Personnel cost; • Station equipment/maintenance/operation, which shall be 10 percent of the City Station Personnel cost; • Fire Marshal allocation at 75 percent of wage and benefit cost of the position, and Fire Inspector at 100 percent of wage and benefit cost of the position (See Exhibit A); and • Apparatus replacement costs based upon the District Apparatus Replacement Schedule — City Rolling Stock designated as Exhibit D. The District Indirect Costs identified in Exhibit C shall then be adjusted based upon the specified percentage of the increased cost of City Station Personnel. The total of the City Station Personnel cost and the Indirect Costs shall be the Contract Payment for the ensuing year. 4.6 Annexation. The City's Urban Growth Area does contain property within the boundaries of the District; however, this provision shall not apply to the annexation of "islands" as referenced in RCW 35,13.182. Should the City seek to annex portions of the District, the District will not oppose the annexation. In the event the City annexes portions of the District, the Contract Payment shall be increased and shall be calculated by applying the then current District levy rate and emergency medical services levy rate to the annexed property. The increased amount shall be added to the Contract Payment as a base for calculations in future years. Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 5 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 315 8.2.a 4.7 Significant Change in Cost of Providing Services. In the event that there is a material and significant increase or decrease in the costs of providing services under this Agreement or an increase in such costs as a result of a legislative or policy decision that is exempt from the dispute resolution provisions of Sections 18.1 and 18.2, then at the request of either party, the City and District shall renegotiate this Agreement and the Contract Payment to fully compensate the District for actual costs incurred according to the methodology in Exhibit C. In the event that the City and E District are unable to successfully renegotiate this Agreement through i good faith negotiations, then the Dispute Resolution provision of this a Agreement shall apply. 0 4.8 EMS Transport Fees. The District understands and acknowledges that the City presently charges fees for basic life support and advanced life support transports E occurring within the City. As the EMS service provider, the District shall receive and collect all Transport Fees in accordance with District policy for transports that originate within the City limits. The District shall remit these amounts, less an c administration fee not to exceed the actual cost of collection, to the City ;v according to the quarterly schedule in Section 4.1. The District shall be i_ responsible for, and agrees to prepare and provide in a timely fashion, all necessary or requested documentation and/or reports to the City. o 4.9 Creating Unfunded Mandates. The City shall not create any unfunded mandates L for increased service by the District without fully compensating the District for actual costs incurred. 5. CITY EMPLOYEES 5.1 All City Employees Become District Employees. The District shall become the employer of all City Fire Department employees, including administrative and unrepresented uniformed, IAFF members, SEIU members, and civilian employees of the City Fire Department on the Commencement Date of this Agreement between the City and the District. The City and District recognize that during the term of the Interlocal Agreement, the uniformed City Fire Department employees will be integrated into Local 1997 of the IAFF. Labor -represented employees will continue in their current positions and job assignments as recognized by the District, or as agreed through collective bargaining prior to the implementation of this Agreement. Administrative uniformed employees may be reassigned to job positions that meet the needs of consolidating the two organizations. Any civilian City Fire Department employee who is reassigned to a new position shall be entitled to wages and benefits consistent with, or greater than, the current wages and benefits provided by the City for such employee's former position. City personnel shall receive the District's compensation levels and benefits as of the Commencement Date of this Agreement. Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 6 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 316 8.2.a 5.2 Seniority and Rank. Any IAFF member of the City Fire Department shall assume employment with the District with complete seniority and rank intact. No additional probationary periods or testing shall be required of any current IAFF member under the Employees of Merged or Contracted Organization's article of the Local 1997 Collective Labor Agreement. For purposes of seniority, the "hire date" of a City Fire Department employee will be the earliest such employee's hire date(s) with Fire District 1, Medic 7, or the City of Edmonds. 5.3 Transfer of Sick and Vacation Leave. Sick and vacation leave of City employees shall be transferred and maintained as attached in Exhibit E. The City shall pay to the District the current value of accrued vacation leave banks as of the date of the transfer. The City shall also pay the cash -out value of City sick leave banks in accordance with applicable Union contract or City policy. "Cash -out value" shall be based on termination by layoff due to lack of work by the City as of the date of the transfer. The District and City may agree to credit this obligation against monies owed by the District under this Agreement. These payments are intended to close out the City's obligations with respect to transferred, accrued leave banks and the provisions of 5.9 shall not apply to unanticipated costs or increases associated with the transferred leave banks such as, but not limited to, increases attributable to changes in statutory or case law relating to the payment of such banks, their impact on overtime requirements or changes in pension law, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that if a transferred employee retires within two (2) years of the date of the transfer and the Washington State Department of Retirement Systems (DRS) treats any portion of the leave bank payouts as excess compensation, the City shall be liable for its proportionate share of such excess compensation cost as determined by DRS. "Proportionate share" shall be determined based on the last wage paid by the City and the leave payout cap in effect as of the date of the transfer and the excess compensation assessment attributable thereto. 5.4 Layoff Language. For the provisions of layoffs or reduction in force, there shall be three established Seniority Lists attached as Exhibit F. • Blended Seniority List consisting of the former members of IAFF Local 1828 (Edmonds Firefighters) and the members of IAFF Local 1997 (Snohomish County Fire District 1 Firefighters). • Non -Blended Seniority List of IAFF local 1997 (District Firefighters) prior to the Commencement Date of the Interlocal Agreement between the District and the City. • Non -Blended Seniority list of IAFF Local 1828 (Edmonds Firefighters) prior to the Interlocal Agreement between the District and the City. 5.4.1 Layoff Within First 60 Months of Contract. If a reduction in force becomes necessary within the first 60 months of this Agreement, the reductions in force shall be initiated utilizing the Blended Seniority List from the most senior to the least senior giving each member the first right of refusal. In the event that the said reduction in force is not accomplished through the Blended Seniority List, Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 7 of 21 November 2, 2009 a Packet Pg. 317 8.2.a the reduction in force shall be incurred upon the least senior members of the jurisdiction causing the reduction in force. The reduction will be based on the Seniority Lists established prior to the Interlocal Agreement between the District and the City. 5.4.2 New Employees. Employees hired after the date of this Interlocal Agreement will be placed on the bottom of the Blended List and will be first subject to layoff. E 5.5 Promotional Language and Probationary Period. The parties agree that two of i three Company Officer promotions required to convert the three -platoon City work a schedule to the District four -platoon work schedule will be made from a promotional list established by the Edmonds Civil Service Commission and consist c solely of eligible pre -Commencement Date City employees. 5.6 Company Officer Promotion Process. The parties agree that the City Company Officer promotion process shall occur prior to the Commencement Date of the Agreement. 5.7 Probation Process for Newly Promoted Company Officers. The parties agree that newly -promoted City Company Officers transferring employment to the District on the Commencement Date shall serve the probationary period of the IAFF 1997 collective labor agreement and District policy, procedures, and performance standards for Company Officers. 5.8 Impact of Agreement. Each party has undertaken to collectively bargain the impact of this Agreement upon the respective labor unions which represent each party's employees. The City and District further acknowledge that the integration of City employees into the District's organizational structure has been in conjunction with the respective labor unions which represent each party's employees, and that the City and District will have reached agreement with existing labor unions, and with each other, that the seniority rights of City Personnel will remain intact and will transfer to their employment with the District, 5.9 Former City Employees. The City shall indemnify, defend, and hold the District harmless from any and all demands, claims, or actions by former City personnel, which arise out of, or relate to, the time prior to the date that such City personnel became employees of the District; provided, however, that the indemnification shall not apply to any claims arising as a result of the District's actions under the Interlocal Agreement. 6. ROLLING STOCK (APPARATUS AND VEHICLES) 6.1 Purchase Rollin_ Stock, tock. The District shall purchase the City Fire Department's rolling stock 'apparatus and vehicles). The Dlstnct shall accept title and ownership of such rolling stock in "as is" condition but only if each individual unit is in a condition reasonably acceptable to the District. Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 8 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 318 8.2.a 6.2 Transfer of Title. The City and District shall cooperate and execute such documents which are necessary to accomplish the transfer of title. 6.3 Rolling Stock Lump Sum Purchase. The District shall make a one-time, lump sum purchase of City rolling stock within 30 days after the Commencement Date of this Agreement, specifically for the ladder (1), engines (3), medic unit (1), aid units (4), utility (1), the 1938 Ford fire engine (1), and six vehicles. 6.4 Purchase Price. The purchase price of each piece of rolling stock shall be the retail price determined by Fire Trucks Plus, Inc.; or by the Kelly Blue Book; the acquisition cost of the 1938 Ford Fire Engine; plus the delivered, set-up and lettered cost of two 2009 Ford E-450s Aid Units manufactured by Braun and identified in Exhibit G. 6.5 Rolling Stock Records. The sale of rolling stock includes all service and maintenance, records, and shop manuals for each purchased unit. 6.6 District Apparatus Replacement Schedule. The District has provided current information regarding existing and proposed Apparatus Replacement Schedule attached in Exhibit D. The District, in its sole discretion, may elect to purchase new rolling stock or otherwise assign District rolling stock for use within the City. 6.7 Public Safety Boat. The Public Safety Boat, acquired with a Department of Homeland Security grant as a county -wide asset and known as Marine 16, remains the property of the City. Use by the District of Marine 16 for training and emergencies as a county -wide asset is described in Exhibit H. 7. EQUIPMENT 7.1 Purchase Equipment. The District shall purchase City Fire Department equipment identified in Exhibit I. Equipment is divided into two categories — (1) that on the Fire Department Attractive Asset List, and (2) that equipment on- board rolling stock. There is no duplication between the two lists. The District shall accept ownership of equipment in "as -is" condition but only if each individual piece of equipment or ensemble is in reasonably acceptable condition as determined solely by the District. 7.2 Equipment Lump Sum Purchase. The District shall make a one-time, lump sum purchase of City equipment within 30 days after the Commencement Date of this Agreement. 7.3 Purchase Price. (1) The purchase price for items on the Asset List was i _ i _ ._-__ _ _ _ _ dpp1..i-_a L ,L-liie 4— 46.pbo determinedFJyiyity sL-aiyiniUCP1VUCXL1Uii w uiV ur 1aQc nrino imin nc and/or estimated present value for each individual item. Straight-line depreciation is calculated by taking the value of the asset and dividing it by the expected life Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 9 of 21 November 2, 2009 0 0 N R c 0` U 0 U �.i c a� E 0 a Packet Pg. 319 8.2.a span, then multiplying the expected life span by the age of the asset (value / years = yearly depreciation x age = depreciation amount). (2) The price for equipment on -board rolling stock was determined by applying five years of depreciation based on a ten-year average replacement schedule to the purchase price of individual items using fire service reference materials including Galls, Life Assist (EMS hard and soft gear), PMI (technical rescue equipment), and Heiman Fire Equipment. This equates to 50 percent depreciation to all equipment. The purchase price and depreciation of each piece of equipment or ensemble is E identified in Exhibit I. L 7.4 Equipment Records and Warranties. The sale of equipment includes all service and maintenance records, and shop manuals. Wherever permitted under the c terms of a contract to purchase a vehicle or equipment transferred to the District or a warranty relating thereto, the City hereby transfers and assigns its interest under such warranties to the District. In the event that only the City may exercise r the warranty, the City will cooperate with and use its best efforts to enforce any warranty regarding equipment provided to the District. 8. OVERSIGHT AND REPORTING 8.1 Agreement Administrators. The District Fire Chief and the City Mayor and/or their designees, shall act as administrators of this Agreement for purposes of RCW 39.34.030. During the term of this Agreement, the District Fire Chief shall provide the Mayor with quarterly reports concerning the provision of services under this Agreement. The format and topics of the reports shall be agreed upon by the District Fire Chief and the Mayor. Additionally, two District Board Commissioner members and two City Council members, along with the District Fire Chief and the Mayor, shall meet at least once per calendar year, on or before April 1, for the purpose of communicating about issues related to this Agreement. The District Fire Chief and the Mayor shall present a joint annual report to the Edmonds City Council prior to July 31. 8.2 Joint Annual Meeting. In addition to the meeting(s) referred to in Section 8.1 above, the Edmonds City Council and Board of Fire District #1 Commissioners shall meet prior to April 1 of each calendar year at a properly noticed place and time to discuss items of mutual interest related to this Agreement. 8.3 Representation on Intergovernmental Boards. The District shall represent the City on intergovernmental boards or on matters involving the provision of services under this Agreement as reasonably requested by the Mayor. The City reserves the right to represent itself in any matter in which the interests of the City and the District are not mutual or whenever any matter relates to the apprvpriatlon %f or expendeture of City f"�n�J� la„nYOnrlM the term- of this L�grPement, Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 10 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 320 8.2.a 9. EXISTING AGREEMENTS 9.1 ESCA, SNOCOM and SERS. The City currently has contractual relationships with other entities or agencies including the Emergency Services Coordinating Agency (ESCA) for all City; Snohomish County Communications Center (SNOCOM) for Fire, Police, and Public Works; and Snohomish County Emergency Radio System Agency (SERS) for Fire and Police. The City shall maintain its representation and financial obligations with those entities or agencies and will act to represent itself and retain authority to negotiate on its behalf. At the discretion of the City, the District may provide representation on behalf of the City on various committees, boards and/or commissions as requested, as appropriate, and/or as agreed to by mutual agreement of the parties. 9.2 Mutual and Automatic Aid. The City and District currently have individual responsibilities and contractual obligations under their respective agreements with other fire agencies. The District shall assume the City's contractual responsibility and obligations for the provision of mutual and automatic aid. At such time as these agreements are renegotiated and re -executed, the District will represent the City's interests and shall be signatory to the agreements on behalf of the City. 9.3 Full Information as Basis for Relationship. The City and District agree to coordinate their individual relationships with other entities and agencies so that the services under this Agreement will be provided in an efficient and cost effective manner. The City and District agree to keep each other fully informed and advised as to any changes in their respective relationships with those entities or agencies, whether or not those changes impact the City and/or the District obligations under this Agreement. Notice of any change in the relationship or obligations shall be provided to the other party in writing in a timely manner that allows a reasonable opportunity to discuss proposed changes in relationships or obligations. 9.4 Dispute Resolution. In the event that any dispute between the City and District cannot be resolved by good faith negotiations between the City and District, then the dispute resolution provision of this Agreement shall apply. 10. TERM OF AGREEMENT 10.1 20-Year Agreement. The effective date of this Agreement shall be upon its execution by the City and District. The Commencement Date of this Agreement shall be January 1, 2010. This Agreement shall continue in effect for a period of twenty (20) years from the Commencement Date, until December 31, 2030, Ur1e5S terminate -a' earlier as provided herein. After 'the initial, twenty, (71.1) dcouoir term, this Agreement shall automatically renew under the same terms and Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 11 of 21 November 2, 2009 c a� 4) L a 0 L 0 0 N C T L 0 U L Y 0 U r a a) E 0 0 a Packet Pg. 321 8.2.a conditions for successive, rolling five (5) year periods unless terminated as provided herein. 10.2 Material Breach and Wind -Up Period. In the event of a Material Breach of this Agreement, the City and District shall, unless the City and District mutually agree otherwise, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement for a minimum of twelve (12) months after notice of the Material Breach (the Wind -Up Period"); provided, however, that the Wind -Up Period shall be 90 E (ninety) days if the Material Breach involves the City's failure to make the i Contract Payment; provided further, that during the Wind -Up Period, the City and a District shall coordinate their efforts to prepare for the transition to other methods of providing fire and EMS service to the City. The City will be responsible for all o payments required herein until the conclusion of the Wind -Up Period. E 11. TERMINATION AND RETURN OF ASSETS 11.1 First Five Years. The City and District acknowledge that in entering into this Agreement, significant financial and personnel resources have been expended. Therefore, neither the City nor the District may terminate this Agreement within the first five (5) years following the Commencement Date except for a Material Breach of this Agreement which the breaching party fails to cure within a reasonable amount of time after receiving written notice from the non -breaching party. The City's and the District's intent by this section is to provide both service stability to citizens and job security to employees. 11.2 Years Six Through Twenty. In addition to terminating this Agreement for a Material Breach, either party may terminate this Agreement after the first five (5) years from the Commencement Date by providing the other party with two (2) years written notice of its intent to terminate during any period of extension. Notice under this provision may only be given once five years have elapsed after the Commencement Date. 11.3 Termination Costs. The costs associated with terminating this Agreement shall be borne by the party who elects to terminate, or in the event of a Material Breach, by the breaching party, provided that in the following circumstances, the costs of termination shall be apportioned. 11.4 Termination Due to Change in Law or by Mutual Agreement. In the event that this Agreement is terminated due to a change in law, each party shall bear its own costs associated with the termination; or, in the event that the City and District mutually agree to terminate this Agreement, each party shall bear its own costs associated with the termination. '11.5 Regional Fire Psotectign Service Authorit in the event that the District, Glon^y with one or more fire protection jurisdictions, elects to create a Regional Fire Protection Service Authority Planning Committee ("RFA Planning Committee") as Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 12 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 322 8.2.a provided in RCW 52.26.030, the District agrees to notify the City of its intent and, subject to approval of the other participating jurisdictions, to afford the City an opportunity to be a participant on the RFA Planning Committee. Declining the opportunity to participate in the RFA Planning Committee shall not be construed as a material breach on the part of the City as defined in the Definitions section of this Agreement. In the even that a Regional Fire Protection Service Authority (RFA) or another legally recognized means of providing fire and emergency medical services is created, inclusive of the City and District, this Interlocal E Agreement will be terminated on the effective date of such Agreement, and ;v neither the City nor the District shall be considered to have committed a material a breach as defined in the Definitions section of this Agreement. 0 11.6 Duty to Mitigate Costs. The City and District have an affirmative duty to mitigate their respective costs of termination, irrespective of the party who elects to terminate this Agreement and irrespective of the party who must bear the costs of termination. 11.7 Return of Assets to the City. Regardless of the reason for termination, the City and District agree that like assets purchased by and transferred to the District as part of this Agreement shall be returned to the City as described below. This provision shall not apply to the formation of a RFA in which both the City and the District are participants. 11.7.1 Purchase Back Rolling Stock. All rolling stock sold under this agreement, or equivalent apparatus and vehicles in use by the District at the time of termination shall be purchased back using the same process, methods, and conditions under which the original purchase was made unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. 11.7.2 Purchase Back Equipment. All equipment sold under this agreement, or equivalent equipment in use by the District at the time of termination shall be purchase back using the same process, methods, and conditions under which the original purchase was made unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. 11.7.3 Rehire Personnel. In the event of termination within the first five (5) years of this Agreement by either party for any reason, the City shall rehire the personnel laid off by the District, up to fifty-four (54) personnel transferred with no loss of compensation and accumulated benefits. Accrued vacation and sick leave banks shall be transferred to the City and the District shall pay to the City the current cash value of the leave banks as determined under the same procedures set forth in Section 5.3 of this Agreement. 11.7.4 Former District Employees. The District shall indemnify, defend and hold _ J_ _i_:�,. ..i:.. 4.. .hirr.A rli-fr;n+ harmless from any and all dernanas, dahnS, or aCu0-iiS by rehilreu personnel, which arises out of or relate to the time that such personnel were employees of the District, PROVIDED HOWEVER, that the indemnification shall Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 13 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 323 8.2.a not apply to any claims arising as a result of the City's actions during the term of the Agreement. 12. DECLINE TO MERGE 12.1 Citv Declines to Merge. In the event that the District enters into an agreement with any other fire district that is substantially equivalent to a merger, the City may decline to be included, and elect to end the Agreement without prejudice or E penalty. The terms and conditions of that termination include written notice i provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.1 to the District of the a intent to end the Agreement not more than 90 days after receiving written notification provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.1 from the o District that the District intends to merge with another entity. 12.1.1 Not a Material Breach. The City decision to not merge does not constitute a Material Breach of the Agreement and none of the penalties associated with a Material Breach shall apply to the City. c 12.1.2 12-Month Notice. The Agreement will end not more than 12 months after the City a� officially notifies the District that it declines to be merged, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, and the costs of termination shall be split evenly c between the parties. c 12.1.3 City Exit from Agreement. If the City elects to terminate the Agreement because L of an impending merger between the District and one or more other jurisdiction, _ the City exit will be under the terms and conditions described in Section 11.7. 13. CITY FIRE DONATION FUND 13.1 Disposition of Fire Donation Funds. Effective on the Commencement Date of this Agreement, the amount of funds in the Fire Department Donation Fund on December 31, 2009 shall be forwarded to the District 1 to acquire fire and life safety tools and equipment not otherwise affordable through the regular budget process. Tools and equipment subsequently acquired with Donation Fund monies by the District will be assigned to Edmonds Fire Stations and apparatus but shall be used without restriction throughout the District service area. 14. TOWN OF WOODWAY 14.1 No Impact on this Agreement. The provision of fire and emergency medical services to the Town of Woodway by the District has no organizational or financial impact on the Agreement between the City and the District or the terms and conditions of said Agreement. Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 14 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 324 8.2.a 15. CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 15.1 Civil Service Commission Notification. The City acknowledges that the City of Edmonds Civil Service Commission has been officially advised of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 16. CITY AND DISTRICT ARE INDEPENDENT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS E 16.1 Independent Governments. The City and District recognize and agree that the i City and District are independent governments. Except for the specific terms a herein, nothing herein shall be construed to limit the discretion of the governing bodies of each party. Specifically and without limiting the foregoing, the District c shall have the sole discretion and the obligation to determine the exact method by which the services are provided within the District and within the City unless otherwise stipulated within this Agreement. L 16.2 Resource Assignments. The District shall assign the resources available to it N without regard to internal political boundaries, but rather based upon the operational judgment of the District as exercised within the limitations and U- obligations of Sections 2.4 through 2.8. 16.3 Debts and Obligations. Neither the City nor District, except as expressly set forth c ° herein or as required by law, shall be liable for any debts or obligations of the L other. 17. INSURANCE 17.1 Maintenance of Insurance. For the duration of this Agreement, each Party shall maintain insurance as follows: Each party shall maintain its own insurance policy insuring damage to its own fire stations, real and personal property and equipment if any, and "policy" shall be understood to include insurance pooling arrangements or compacts such as the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA). The City shall maintain an insurance policy insuring against liability for accidents occurring on City owned property. Such insurance policy shall be in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more than $5,000. The District shall maintain an insurance policy insuring against liability arising out of work or operations performed by the District under this Agreement in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more than $5,000. The phrases "work or operations and "maintenance and operations" shall include the services identified in Section 1. Scope of Services, the services of the Fire Marshal and the District's Fire Chief, acting in the capacity of City Fire Chief and any obligation covered by Exhibit B, Section 9. 17.2 Claims of Former City Employees. The City has provided proof of coverage that it has maintained insurance against claims by former City Personnel for incidents Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 15 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 325 8.2.a and occurrences which may have occurred prior to the Commencement Date of the Interlocal Agreement, including but not limited to, injuries, employment claims, labor grievances, and other work -related claims. Such insurance was at all times in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more than $5,000. The City will hold harmless the District and its insurance provider for any such claims, lawsuits or accusations that occurred prior to the Commencement Date of the Interlocal Agreement, E 17.3 Claims of Former District Employees, The District represents and warrants that it L a has maintained insurance against claims by District employees for incidents and occurrences which may have occurred during the time period prior to the c Commencement Date of the Agreement, including but not limited to injuries, employment claims, labor grievances, and other work -related claims. Such insurance was at all times in an amount not less than one million dollars r ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more than $5,000. y 17.4 Hold Harmless. To the extent each party's insurance coverage is not voided, each party agrees to defend and hold harmless the other party, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from any and all claims, costs, including reasonable attorneys' and expert witness fees, losses and judgments arising out of the negligent and intentional acts or omissions of such party's officers, officials, employees and volunteers in connection with the performance of this Agreement. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 17.5 Release from Claims. Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, and except in the event of breach of this Agreement, the District and the City do hereby forever release each other from any claims, demands, damages or causes of action related to damage to equipment or property owned by the City or District or assumed under this Agreement. It is the intent of the City and District to cover this risk with the insurance noted above. 18. DISPUTE RESOLUTION 18.1 Mediation. It is the intent of the City and District to resolve all disputes between them without litigation. Excluded from mediation are issues related to the legislative authority of the Edmonds City Council to make budget and appropriation decisions, decisions to contract, or establish levels of service under Section 2.4 of this Agreement and Chapter 35.103 RCW. Policy decisions of the City Council shall not be subject to review by a mediator; however, this shall not abridge the right of the District to pursue an increase in the Annual Contract Payment as a result of such decision. The City and District shall mutually agree upon a mediator. Any expenses incidental to mediation, including the mediator's fee, shall be borne equally by the City and District. If the City and District cannot agree upon a mediator, the City and District shall submit the matter to the Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 16 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 326 8.2.a Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service (JAMS) and request that a mediator be appointed. This requirement to mediate the dispute may only be waived by mutual written agreement before a party may proceed to litigation as provided within this agreement. 18.2 Binding Arbitration. If the City and District are unsuccessful in renegotiating the Contract Payment after having completed mediation, the City and District shall submit the matter to binding arbitration with the foregoing arbitration service. Excluded from binding arbitration are issues related to the legislative authority of ;v the Edmonds City Council to make budget and appropriation decisions, decisions a to contract, or establish levels of service under Section 2.4 of this Agreement and Chapter 35.103 RCW. Policy decisions of the City Council shall not be subject to 0 review by an arbitrator; however, this shall not abridge the right of the District to pursue an increase in the Annual Contract Payment as a result of such decision. The arbitration shall be conducted according to the selected arbitration service's Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures. At this arbitration, the arbitrator shall, as nearly as possible, apply the analysis used in this agreement and o supporting Exhibits to adjust the Contract Payment. The arbitrator may deviate ;v from such analysis and use principles of fairness and equity, but should do so i- sparingly. Unless the City and District mutually consent, the results of any binding arbitration session shall not be deemed to be precedent for any subsequent mediations or arbitrations. ° 18.3 Prevailing Party. In the event either party herein finds it necessary to bring an action against the other party to enforce any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof or any instrument executed pursuant to this Agreement by reason of any breach or default hereunder or there under, the party prevailing in any such action or proceeding shall be paid all costs and attorneys' fees incurred by the other party, and in the event any judgment is secured by such prevailing party, all such costs and attorneys' fees of collection shall be included in any such judgment. Jurisdiction and venue for this Agreement lies exclusively in Snohomish County, Washington. 19. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 19.1 Noticing Procedures. All notices, demands, requests, consents and approvals which may, or are required to be given by any party to any other party hereunder, shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally, sent by facsimile, sent by nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or if mailed or deposited in the United States mail, sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid to: District Secretary: City Clerk: Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1 City of Edmonds 12425 Meridian Avenue 121 5th Avenue North Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 17 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 327 8.2.a Everett, WA 98208 Edmonds, WA 98020 Or, to such other address as the foregoing City and District hereto may from time -to -time designate in writing and deliver in a like manner. All notices shall be deemed complete upon actual receipt or refusal to accept delivery. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission shall be the same as delivery of an original document. 19.2 Other Cooperative Agreements. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the City and the District from entering into contracts for service in support of this Agreement. 19.3 Public Duty Doctrine. This Agreement shall not be construed to provide any benefits to any third parties. Specifically, and without limiting the foregoing, this Agreement shall not create or be construed as creating an exception to the Public Duty Doctrine. The City and District shall cooperate in good faith and execute such documents as necessary to effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 19.4 Entire Agreement. This entire agreement between the City and District hereto is contained in this Agreement and exhibits hereto; and this Agreement supersedes all of their previous understandings and agreements, written and oral, with respect to this transaction. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument executed by the City and District subsequent to the date hereof. Dated this 3 day of ovc-,1k, 2009 SNOHOMISH C❑ N' By: Com ' sio r By: Commissioner By. Commissioner FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT N Commissioner Commissioner Attest: District Secretary ... :: ��■ ply q -; Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 18 of 21 November 2, 2009 a Packet Pg. 328 8.2.a CITY OF E MONDS By: 4��Z� City Mayor Approved a t )5� By: City Attar Attest--,,G• 'd. City Clerk Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 19 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 329 8.2.a Definitions The following definitions shall apply throughout this Agreement. a. Cam: City of Edmonds. b. City Fire Chief: The Fire Chief of the City of Edmonds E C. City Fire Department: The Edmonds Fire Department. a L d. City Fire Stations: Currently, Fire Station 16, Fire Station 17, and Fire a Station 20. c L e. Commencement Date: The date at which the performance and obligations of the City and District as contained herein begin. City Personnel: The employees of the City of Edmonds Fire Department as of the Commencement Date who are transferring employment to the District. g. Contract Payment: The annual amount that the City will pay to the District pursuant to this Agreement. h. District: Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1. Effective Date: The date this Agreement is executed by the City and District. District Fire Chief: The Fire Chief of Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1. k. Firefighter/EMS Personnel: Full-time, compensated employees, firefighters, emergency medical technicians, or paramedics Grid Cards: The electronic file within the Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) System, which is used to determine fire station response order for Fire District 1. M. Insurance: The term "insurance" as used in this agreement means either valid insurance offered and sold by a commercial insurance company or carrier approved to do business in the State of Washington by the Washington State Insurance Commissioner or valid self-insurance through a self-insurance pooling organization approved for operation in the State of Washington by the Washington State Risk Manager or any combination of valid commercial insurance and self-insurance pooling if both are approved for sale and/or operation in the State of Washington. Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 20 of 21 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 330 8.2.a n. Material Breach: A Material Breach means: the District's failure to provide minimum staffing levels as described within this Agreement; the City's failure to timely pay the Contract Payment as described within this Agreement, or the City's or District's failure to comply within this Agreement concerning the City's fire stations, equipment and/or apparatus. a� E o. Wind -Up Period: The 12 months immediately following formal notification i of a Material Breach by either party except as defined in Section 10.2. a Interlocal Agreement for Fire and Emergency Medical Service Operations Page 21 of 21 November 2, 2009 0 r 0 N R C T L 0 U L Y 0 U r c a� E t v Q Packet Pg. 331 April 2016 Executive Summary City of Edmonds Washington r FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Prepared by: FITCH & ASSOCIATES, LLC 2901 Williamsburg Terrace #G ■ Platte City ■ Missouri ■ 64079 816.431.2600 ■ www.fitchassoc.com Packet Pg. 332 8.2.b TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS— FISCAL ANALYSIS 1 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS — CONTRACTUAL STRUCTURE 2 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS — OPERATIONS 3 COMMUNITY SERVICE DEMANDS 3 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 5 SYSTEM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 7 ALTERNATIVES FOR CONSIDERATION 8 ALTERNATIVE 1 9 ALTERNATIVE 2 10 ALTERNATIVE 3 12 CONSIDERATION FOR LONG-TERM PLANNING AND SUSTAINABILITY 16 FIGURE 1: FISCAL ANALYSIS 2007 - 2016 2 FIGURE 2: NUMBER OF EDMONDS INCIDENTS BY CALLTYPE IN 2014 4 FIGURE 3: PERCENTAGE OF FIRE RELATED CAD INCIDENTTYPES 4 FIGURE 4: AVERAGE CALLS BY HOUR OF DAY 5 FIGURE 5: 90TH PERCENTILE PERFORMANCE BY CALL TYPE 7 FIGURE 6: AVERAGE EMS CALLS/TRANSPORTS BY HOUR OF DAY 9 FIGURE 7: STATION DEMAND ZONE RELIABILITY 11 FIGURE 8: PROBABILITY OF OVERLAPPED CALLS OCCURRING IN ALTERNATIVE 2 12 FIGURE 9: STRUCTURAL FIRES AND HOME STRUCTURE FIRES BY YEAR 13 FIGURE 10: TREND IN CIVILIAN IRE DEATH RATES PER MILLION POPULATION 1977-2014 13 FIGURE 11: NUMBER OF UNITS RESPONDING TO FIRE RELATED INCIDENTS 15 FIGURE 12: OPPORTUNITY TO CONSUME THE RISK AT NO COST 15 FIGURE 13: OPTIMIZED STATION LOCATIONS WITH 6-MINUTE TRAVELTIME 16 FIGURE 14: OPTIMIZED STATION LOCATIONS FOR 6-MINUTE TRAVEL TIME 17 Edmonds, Washington Page i © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 333 8.2.b Executive Summary In 2010, the City of Edmonds' city council elected to transition from a municipal fire service r provided by the City to a contracted service with the Snohomish County Fire District 1. The m parties expressed mutual interest in reopening contract negotiations after the first five years of E the contract. To prepare for those negotiations and to better understand the various service a� delivery options, the City of Edmonds contracted with Fitch & Associates, LLC (FITCH) to conduct a a review of the fire and emergency medical services within the City of Edmonds and to explore c options that maintain or improve services, contain costs, and provide for long-term +; c sustainability. This report is a culmination of information developed from onsite-structured interviews with key stakeholders, budget analyses, staffing analyses, quantitative and temporal analyses, and Geographic Information System (GIS) analyses. The FITCH team met with elected officials from the City of Edmonds, City Staff, and Fire District 1's administrative team early in the project and then near the conclusion of the project to ensure a transparent and collaborative process. The FITCH team found Snohomish County Fire District 1 to be a high quality, innovative, and professional fire and emergency service organization. The management team was well versed in modern management and operational practices in the provision of emergency services and has generally provided exemplary service to the City of Edmonds. Fire District 1 has received multiple awards for innovative practices in emergency medical services and is providing efficient and effective services as prescribed at the inception of the current agreement between the City and the District. Recommendations contained herein are intended to assist in guiding future discussions and negotiations between the City of Edmonds and Fire District 1 by providing an objective and data - driven analysis of the current performance and identifying future opportunities. This report is the culmination of three separate reports consisting of an executive summary report, a presentation slide deck, and a data report. General Observations - Fiscal Analysis The process utilized by the FITCH team was to first examine whether the City's decision to contract with Fire District 1 was a good decision fiscally. Findings suggest that the City has realized savings that are generally aligned with the original costs projections. The performance for the first five years of the contractual relationship has been financially beneficial to the City as compared to the estimated costs of continuing to operate its own municipal fire department. Edmonds, Washington Page 1 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 334 8.2.b Fiscal analyses from 2007 through 2016 are presented as Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Fiscal Analysis 2007 - 2016 City Operated Fire Department vs. Contract Services Fiscal Analysis 2007 thru 2016 $8,500,000 $8,000,000 $7,500,000 $7,000,000 $6,500,000 $6,000,000 - $5,500,000 - $5,000,000 - 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 -City Projected - CPI-W -District Contract The City has benefited fiscally from its relationship with Snohomish County Fire District 1. General Observations - Contractual Structure Early in this project it was evident that the City did not retain the institutional knowledge associated with the decision to migrate to a contracted service provider. For example, all of the current elected officials and budgeted staff were not in place when the decision process occurred. The historical perspective of how the inception agreement was defined and established is therefore not codified within the institutional memory. What is available is the understanding that the City elected to maintain all of the current services, stations, and number of personnel through the transition to the District. While it would not be uncommon for the elected body to maintain the status quo in services while realizing fiscal benefits, the unintended consequence five years later, is that the contract language may be overly prescriptive for both the City and the District. It is suggested that the City consider a performance -based contract with the District that defines the intended performance rather than prescribing the resources allocated to the performance. Edmonds, Washington Page 2 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 335 8.2.b The District currently has other Interlocal agreements (ILA) that are less prescriptive and more performance driven. The City and the District is encouraged to change from a prescriptive contract to a performance - based contract. General Observations - Operations The next approach that the FITCH team utilized was to examine what opportunities existed operationally that may add value for the City. Value is loosely defined as operational improvements to the service delivery model that have fiscal benefits to the City, while remaining within an acceptable risk tolerance. This value -based analysis is designed to assist the City and the District to maintain a long-term sustainable relationship. This analysis also recognizes that risk cannot be eliminated, even with a huge increase in resource allocation to readiness. Because there will always be risk, policy -makers should focus on finding the right risk - readiness balance for the City of Edmonds. The Edmonds Data Report and Presentation has considerable data describing the system's historical demand and current performance. In this executive summary, only pertinent data elements will be provided that support the substantive recommendations. Community Service Demands The demands for service, or risks, that the City of Edmonds residents and visitors require is overwhelming for Emergency Medical Services (EMS). In total, the EMS category, which contains Basic Life Support (BLS) calls, and EMS-ALS category, which includes Advanced Life Support (ALS) calls, account for 85% of the total requests for service. Conversely, in 2014, fire -related incidents accounted for 450 responses or 9.8% of the total responses at just over 1 call per day. A summary of the demands for service within Edmonds is provided below. Edmonds, Washington Executive Summary Page 3 © Fitch & Associates April 2016 Packet Pg. 336 8.2.b Figure 2: Number of Edmonds Incidents by Call Type in 2014 Call Category EMS Number of Calls 2,547 Calls per Day 7.0 Call Percentage 55.2 EMS-ALS 1,398 3.8 30.3 Fire Related 450 1.2 9.8 Special Ops 8 0.0 0.2 Service 210 0.6 4.6 Total 4,613 12.6 100.0 Fire related incidents are a broad category that encompasses many call types in addition to structural fires. In total over 83% of all of the fire related incidents are encapsulated in the first four call types of single engine responses, fire alarms (commercial and residential), and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire alarms are a result of the alarm system activating, not an indication of an actual fire as generally a fire alarm that was an actual fire would be appropriately classified as a structure fire. In 2014, 23 structure fires (shown as Fire Residential and Fire Commercial in the figure below) were recorded at just over 5% of the fire related incidents, which is 0.5% of the total system response. Data is presented below. Fi gure 3: Percentage Final Type FS aT vire Kelatea LAU InClaent types Number Percentage of Tatal F Ire Service Final Pow Description of Calls Demands Fire Single Engine response 148 32.9 FAC Fire Alarm Commercial 136 30.2 FAR Fire Alarm Residential 63 14.0 COA Carbon Monoxide Alarm 27 6.0 MU Move Up 20 4.4 GLO Gas Leak Outside 18 4.0 FC Fire Commercial 12 2.7 FR Fire Residential 11 2.4 GLI Gas Leak Inside 8 1.8 FA5 Fire Alarm Sprinkler Water flow 4 0.9 FB Fire Brush 2 0.4 MVCE Motor Vehicle Collision with Entrapment 1 0.2 Structural fires (FC/FR), are a broad category of building fires that could include small fires such as food on the stove or a small kitchen fire up to a large warehouse or hotel fire that is heavily involved in fire. However, an evaluation of the time on task of all fire related incidents may provide context to the average severity of incidents as the time on task for fire related events was 256.5 hours, or 21 minutes per responding unit, in 2014. The relationship of fires to the total demand for services is not unique to the City of Edmonds. Nationally, a downward trend has existed since the late 70s. Edmonds, Washington Page 4 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 337 8.2.b Finally, the average total demand for all services within Edmonds is less than one call per hour at the peak of the day. A temporal distribution of all fire and EMS calls is presented below. Figure 4: Average Calls by Hour of Day 1.0 Average Calls per Day by Hour 0.9 0.8 0.7 0 7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 ' 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 I I 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ■ Fire ■ BLS ■ ALS System Performance A response time continuum was utilized to examine the individual time elements of turnout time, travel time, and total response time. Turnout time is defined as the time interval from when the stations or units are dispatched to an incident until the unit is responding to the incident. Travel time is defined as the time interval from when the unit first began responding until arrival at the scene of the incident. Response time is defined as the time interval from dispatch until arrival. At the 901h percentile, the turnout time is 2.6 minutes, or 2:36 for all call types. The travel time ranges from 5.1 minutes to 7.4 minutes and has an aggregate value of 5.7 minutes, or 5:42. The total response time is approximately 7.5 minutes or 7:30. Two notable national recommendations for response time performance are noted in NFPA 17101 (4 minutes) and the Commission on Fire Accreditation Internationale (5 minutes and 21 seconds) for an urban population density. The current performance for travel time is outside of these national recommendations, but within the general national experience of six to eight minutes. A very small percentage of departments are able to meet the national best practice for 1 National Fire Protection Association. (2016). NFPA 1710, Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments. Boston, MA: National Fire Protection Association. 2 CFAL (2009). Fire & Emergency Service Self -Assessment Manual, 8" (ed.). Chantilly, Virginia: Author. (p. 71) Edmonds, Washington Page 5 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 338 8.2.b travel time recommendations due to the costs associated with a higher concentration of fire stations and resources. Furthermore, unlike turnout time (discussed below), there are several variables outside the District's control that can have a negative impact on travel time. However, a no -cost option for improvement does exist that could improve system performance by up to one minute. The NFPA recommends a 60 second turnout time for all EMS incidents and E a� 80 seconds for fire and special operations incidents.' The Commission on Fire Accreditation ;v International (CFAI) follows the same recommendations for optimal performance but will allow a up to 90 seconds for turnout time.' 0 L d Currently, the District's adopted performance standard is 2 minutes and 45 seconds at the 901h = percentile, or nearly double the most lenient national recommendation. The District developed this standard internally; therefore, the District has the flexibility to develop a new standard for N turnout performance. For example, a brief search of existing standards of coverage documents o a� demonstrate that the following agencies' actual performance is closely approximating or exceeding the CFAI recommendation of 90 seconds for turnout time: ■ City of Clovis, CA — 84 seconds for non -ems and 65 seconds for EMS at the 901h percentile (2015) ■ City of Olathe, KS —100 seconds for Fire and 94 seconds for EMS incidents at the 90th percentile (2011) ■ City of Colorado Springs, CO — 99 seconds for all first arriving units at the 90t" percentile (2011) ■ City of Salem, OR — 64 seconds for all incidents at the 85 percentile. (Under 90 seconds for 90t" percentile) (2011) Seizing the opportunity to hold the system accountable and to manage turnout time performance may provide an equivalent value of over a million dollars in service enhancements at no cost. In other words, if the system chose to purchase a minute improvement in overall response time, it would require considerable investment in new stations, equipment, and personnel to achieve such an improvement through a travel time improvement. But a similar overall response time improvement could be achieved cost-free by establishing a performance - based contract requiring that the District meet best practices for turnout time. System performance for the City of Edmonds is presented below. 3 National Fire Protection Association. (2016). NFPA 1710, Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments. Boston, MA: National Fire Protection Association. 4 CFAI. (2009). Fire & Emergency Service Self -Assessment Manual, 8" (ed.). Chantilly, Virginia: Author. (p. 71) Edmonds, Washington Page 6 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 339 8.2.b Figure 5: 90th Percentile Performance by Call Type Call Category EMS Turrm3ut Time 2.5 Travel Time 5.9 Response Time 7.5 Semple Size 2,471 EMS-ALS 2.4 5.1 6.9 1,376 Fire 2.9 6.6 8.5 422 Special Ops 2.3 7.4 9.4 8 Total 2.6 5.7 7.5 4,277 The City and the District is encouraged to enter into a performance based contract where the District is expected to meet best practice on turnout time (90 seconds 90% of the time) within a reasonable improvement period. System Performance Standards The Snohomish County Fire District 1's services within the City of Edmonds are appropriately resourced for the contractual requirements. In addition, the District has internally developed and adopted response standards by call type for travel time for the entire district. However, as reported by the District's 2015 annual report some of the adopted standards are not currently being met within the City and in some instances have never been met.s The District is a progressive and professional agency that has taken the first step in adopting performance standards to guide their efforts to meet community expectations for service. In larger systems, such as the entirety of District 1, it is not uncommon to have an aggregate performance standard that is being met at the organizational level and yet have specific areas that are challenged to meet those same standards. The City Council for the City of Edmonds is a partner with all of District 1 as a service provider, but also retains the responsibility to participate in a fluid standard setting process for the contracted services within the City, as occurred at the inception of the relationship. In other words, the City should have an expectation that they have input into the development of service expectations within the City and the flexibility to adjust said performance standards. For example, there may be greater value in adopting achievable performance standards within the City, rather than acknowledging continued deficiencies without the associated active planning efforts to improve service to meet the current standards. To be clear, the District is providing high quality services to the City and has established themselves as a leader in the fire and emergency service industry by adopting performance s Snohomish County Fire District 1. (2015). 2015 Annual Report to the City of Edmonds. Everett, Washington: Author. Edmonds, Washington Page 7 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 340 8.2.b standards. In addition, the District should be commended for their transparency and accountability in reporting performance to the City. However, improving travel time downward (faster) typically requires a greater distribution of stations, a costly endeavor. It is assumed that the firefighters are driving at the most efficient and safe speeds while responding. The two areas that are under the greatest control of management, are minimal to no cost options to improve, and provide the greatest return on investment are the time it takes to dispatch the calls and the time it takes it the crews to turnout for the call. Since travel time is difficult to adjust without substantial redistribution of resources or new resource allocation, the City and the District may benefit from setting performance standards for "total response time" that encompasses dispatch time, turnout time, and the travel time. From this perspective, the standard is more reflective of the customers' actual experience from the time that 911 is initiated until the arrival of resources. The City and the District are encouraged to collaboratively define and adopt service standards for services within the City of Edmonds. Specifically, adjust performance standards that historically have not been obtainable and are not expected to be obtainable or, where possible, develop a plan to meet the current standards. The City and the District are encouraged to establish performance standards for total response time that includes all time elements of dispatch, turnout, and travel time. Alternatives for Consideration The data suggests that there are several potential opportunities for service adjustments that may be either more efficient, effective, and/or contain costs within acceptable risk tolerance. Once again, under the current contract and conditions, the District is providing high quality services and generally commensurate with the City's own services prior to entering into a contractual relationship with the District. Therefore, the identified alternatives specifically are generated to explore fiscal efficiencies that are either within an acceptable risk envelope or better align resources to actual community demands for service. It does not appear that this system was originally designed with the benefit of a data -driven analysis like this one. So, rather than assuming that the status quo provides the optimal balance between risk and readiness, policy -makers may want to consider what they would want the system to look like if they were designing the system from scratch today. Each alternative is briefly summarized. Edmonds, Washington Page 8 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 341 8.2.b Alternative 1 Alternative number one achieves improved ALS services throughout the community and realizes operational and fiscal efficiencies by better aligning resource allocation to actual demands for service. The peak of the day between 8 am and 8 pm are the busiest time of day for all calls including EMS incidents. A temporal distribution of hourly call demand for all calls 2014 was presented as above. Similarly, a temporal distribution of hourly call demand for EMS incidents and transports is provided below. Figure 6: Average EMS Calls/Transports by Hour of Day The City is adequately resourced for both the geographic limitations and the demand for services with four (4) full time units. However, during the non -peak hours, the City and the District could agree to adjust resource allocation as the demand for services declines. Similarly, the City and District could agree to upgrade all of the first response engines and trucks to ALS capability and cross staff Medic units at each station. With ALS capability at each fire station location, the City would enjoy an improved response time performance for ALS incidents and maintain advanced capability for all calls for the occasions when the actual call is more severe than originally believed at the time of dispatch. The 24-hour dedicated Medic unit (Medic 17) is necessary through the peak of the day, a however, during the non -peak times the data suggests that cross -staffed Medic units could handle the demand for services at less than 0.5 calls per hour. In other words during the day, there would be two cross -staffed Medic Units, three ALS capable first response fire apparatus, Edmonds, Washington Page 9 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 342 8.2.b and a fully staffed Medic unit. In the non -peak hours, there would be three cross -staffed Medic units and three ALS capable first response fire apparatus. In total, there are between 6 and 7 transports per day in the City of Edmonds, or approximately two to three transports per unit per day if evenly distributed under this system design. r c m This more efficient allocation of services will improve services for AILS incidents, reduce the E as demand of external Medic units to respond into Edmonds, and provide for approximately a ;v $500,000 reduction in expenditures. a 0 L Alternative 2 Alternative 2 is an incremental adjustment to Alternative 1. With this alternative, all stations and first response apparatus would be upgraded to ALS capability and cross -staff Medic units at each station. The most significant difference with this alternative is that the full-time Medic unit would transition to a cross -staffed unit in a commensurate manner that District one addresses EMS services. The City of Edmonds has the only dedicated full-time 24 hours staffed Medic unit in the District. However, it is important to acknowledge that as the demand for EMS services continues to increase, adopting this alternative may have limited sustainability as resources will need to be repurchased and placed into the system. For example, while this deployment strategy has worked well for District 1, the District has instituted three peak -load Medic units to better handle the growing demand for services. The operational benefits of this alternative are that ALS capable units will have an improved response time for ALS incidents and there should be a reduction in the demand for external Medic responses. The fiscal benefit is approximately a $1,000,000 annual reduction in expenditures. The operational impact to the system's performance is that at peak times, without the surge capacity of the fourth unit, the overall response times may vary between six and eight minutes as resources are drawn down. Our analyses demonstrate that 98% of all calls can be handled within an eight -minute travel time. In other words, if one of the three Medic units were on a call at all times, the system would still maintain a nationally accepted performance standard of eight minutes for ALS incidents.' To better articulate the limited risk associated with this alternative, analyses for both station reliability and call concurrency were completed. First, reliability is a measure of how often the station was available and able to respond to a request for service within the assigned station area. Overall, the system is highly reliable at greater than 80% in all station jurisdictions. In other 6 National Fire Protection Association. (2016). NFPA 1710, Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments. Boston, MA: National Fire Protection Association. Edmonds, Washington Page 10 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 343 8.2.b words, greater than eight out of every 10 requests for service, the closest unit is available and able to respond to the incident. The current station reliability is presented in the figure below. Another lens to examine the system performance is to determine how often calls occur simultaneously or overlap. An analysis was completed to determine the probability of this occurring under the assumption of the system design in Alternative 2. Results found that with each station cross -staffing a Medic unit, approximately 84% all requests for service will be handled by the closest unit and returned to service without a second or greater request for service within the same district. Conversely, approximately 15% to 16% of the time, a second or greater call will occur simultaneous requiring the next closest unit to respond. When this occurs, the designed response time will vary since the closest unit is no longer handling the incident. The probability of concurrent or overlapping calls is presented below. Figure 7: Station Demand Zone Reliability Station Demand Zone Reliability 90 P 80 e 70 r 60 c 50 e 40 n t 30 20 a 9 10 e 0 Station 16 Station 17 Station 20 Station Demand Zone Edmonds, Washington Page 11 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 344 8.2.b Figure 8: Probability of Overlapped Calls Occurring in Alternative 2 Probability of Overlapped Calls Occurring 25 20 i6.4 15.5 15.2 15 10 5 a Station 16 Station 17 Station 20 Alternative 3 Alternative three considers the relative risk associated with the incidence of fire both nationally and specifically within the City of Edmonds. As previously, discussed in this executive summary, the overwhelming majority of the community's demands for services are for EMS. In 2014, for the City of Edmonds, 9.8% of the total demands for service were for fire related calls. There were approximately 23 actual structure fire incidents accounting for approximately 5% of the fire related incidents and less than 0.5% of the community's demand for all services. Data was previously presented above. Edmonds' fire experience is not unique. Nationally, the trends in the number of structural fires and civilian fire death rates have been in decline since 1977. Data from the National Fire Protection Association is presented in the figures below.' ' NFPA. (2016). Trends and Patterns of U.S. Fire Loss. Quincy, Massachusetts: Author. Edmonds, Washington Page 12 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 345 8.2.b Figure 9: Structural Fires and Home Structure Fires by Year Figure 7. All Structure Fires and Home Structure Fires by Year 1977-2014 1,200 1,098.0 1,000 T All structure fires 10 844 T23.5 H Date stnucture fires c m 0 640 494.0 400 367.5 200 0 Figure 10: Trend in Civilian ire Death Rates per Million Population 1977-2014 Flours & Trend to Civilian Fire Da@M Plates per Million Population, lTn-2014 40 -4 34.7 35 35.8 29.2 06 O 30 88,E 25.3 25.924,3 25.3 Includes the nibs of W11120a1 C 25 26.0 20.8 22.1 c 11 20 x 21.a 18.51&017.46.8 � 15.2 14.0: 15 17.7 164 13.5 12.4 1;,9 10.9 10.9 10,1 10.3 13.1 10 134 12.0 133 11.4 9. 5 11 9.8 9.0 10.3 Excludes the events of 91111=1 0 . . . . _ ,. . ..}_ . . ... _ . . . The community's risk profile forms the predicate for this alternative along with the understanding that risk cannot be eliminated at any resource level. Because structure fires amount to 0.5% of the community's total demand for services, the policy -makers could find that this alternative, which preferences ALS readiness over fire readiness, best aligns allocated resources to actual community demands for service. In other words, as the community's risk exposure in frequency, property damage, and civilian fatalities continues to fall, there are opportunities to re-evaluate the risk tolerance and resource allocation associated with fire incidents. Edmonds, Washington Page 13 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 346 8.2.b However, it is important to acknowledge that at the individual incident level, fire is no less dangerous today than it has ever been. For example, the rate of home fire deaths per thousand fires has not reduced significantly since 1977.$ What has changed is the frequency of occurrence. The reduction in frequency has significantly reduced community risk and exposure by reducing overall civilian fire deaths and property loss. The data suggests that the City could assume minimal risk on fire related risks and receive significant fiscal benefits. The fiscal advantage is from shifting expenditures away from readiness costs that are misaligned with actual community demands for service. It is within the City's capability to adjust the readiness level for these services based on willingness to assume risk and the community's overall risk exposure. Therefore, Alternative 3 includes adjusting the travel time performance for fire related incidents from six minutes to eight minutes. The net effect is that the City would be covered for fire peril with two fire suppression apparatus rather than three. The District's desire to assemble 19 personnel on -scene of a structural fire incident would not change, but may include additional time for the next closest replacement unit to arrive on the small percentage of the incidents when this is required, or approximately 1% of the total requests for services. Since the City of Edmonds is a partner in the greater District and have adjacent agencies that provide automatic aid response into Edmonds, an analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential impact or "ripple effect" of requiring a third fire suppression apparatus in Edmonds. The analyses revealed that out of all 450 fire related requests for service in 2014, 80% of the incidents were handled by one apparatus and no more than two apparatus handled 90%. Therefore, with consideration of the relatively high reliability of station performance, the low demand for fire related services, and the relatively low rate of concurrent calls, the frequency of drawing in additional resources from either the District or neighboring communities should be reasonable. In addition, the reconfiguration of Medic units will reintroduce ALS capacity back to the District and neighboring communities at an equal or higher rate. Data is presented below. 8Ibid. Edmonds, Washington Executive Summary Page 14 © Fitch & Associates April 2016 Packet Pg. 347 8.2.b Figure 11: Number of Units Responding to Fire Related Incidents Number of Responding Units Number of Calls Percent of Total Cumulative Percent Total I As previously discussed, the City and the District have an opportunity to mitigate the travel time impact associated with this alternative by embracing the opportunity to improve the turnout time. For example, the current travel time performance for fire related incidents is 6.6 minutes. The proposed elongation of fire related travel time is therefore, 1.4 minutes. The current turnout time for fire related incidents is 2.9 minutes or six seconds less than double the recommendation. For fire related incidents alone, if the turnout time was managed (reduced) from 2.9 minutes to 1.5 minutes it would eliminate most of the assumption of new risk because the customers' experience from the time 911 is initiated until arrival may be commensurate with current service. Please see the summary provided below. Figure 12: Opportunity to Consume the Risk at No Cost Alternative 3 would also maintain the 24-hour staffed and dedicated Medic unit for Edmonds at Station 17, upgrade all first response fire suppression apparatus to ALS capability, and cross - staff 2 additional Medic units, while responding from all three current fire stations. The net benefits for this alternative is that ALS response time performance and capacity will be improved, there should be a reduction in demand for external Medic unit resources, and minimal risk assumed associated with less than 0.5% of the overall demand for services. The fiscal benefit is a reduction of nearly $1,500,000 in annual expenditures. Edmonds, Washington Page 15 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 348 8.2.b Consideration for Long-term Planning and Sustainability Finally, GIS analyses suggest that Edmonds could maintain current service capacity defined as a 6-minute travel time with two stations if they were more strategically placed. It is understood that reconfiguring a system would consume considerable capital outlay and would require a long planning horizon. However, these analyses are provided as a resource for the City's long- term planning and/or for when capital infrastructure is to be replaced. Optimizing the station locations would provide a similar reduction in expenditures as Alternative 3 but maintain current travel time performance. Figure 13: Optimized Station Locations with 6-Minute Travel Time Rank 1 Latitude 47.791328 Longitude -122.357129 Station Capture 2904 Total Capture 2904 Percent Capture 66.36% 2 47.81875 -122.343426 1215 4119 94.13% 3 47.846172 -122.316018 130 4249 97.10% 4 47.809609 -122.357129 65 4314 98.58% 5 47.837031 -122.357129 40 4354 99.50% 6 47.855312 -122.329722 3 4357 99.57% 7 47.837031 -122.329722 3 4360 99.63% 8 47.846172 -122.329722 1 4361 99.66% Edmonds, Washington Executive Summary Page 16 © Fitch & Associates April 2016 Packet Pg. 349 8.2.b Figure 14: Optimized Station Locations for 6-Minute Travel Time Edmonds, WA - 2014 Data Optimized Post Locations (Rank) C Optimized Polygons - 6 min Edmonds WA - FQ1 Fire Stations L Brier ■ Ed monds U Everett LJ Lynnwood L Mountlake Terrace 7 Edmonds, Washington Page 17 © Fitch & Associates Executive Summary April 2016 Packet Pg. 350 tchment: Fitch Executive Summary Report (1721 : Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement) April 2016 Data Analysis Report City of Edmonds Washington FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FITCH FITCH & ASSOCIATES, LLC 2901 Williamsburg Terrace #G ■ Platte City ■ Missouri ■ 64079 816.431.2600 ■ www.fitchassoc.com 8.2.c i] 8.2.c FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT EDMONDS, WASHINGTON TABLE OF CONTENTS METHODOLOGY COMMUNITY RESPONSE HISTORY 1 2 Fire Related Services 10 Emergency Medical Services 16 BLS/ALS Transport 27 CASCADE OF EVENTS 30 Detection 30 Call Processing 30 Turnout Time 30 Travel Time 30 Total Response Time 30 Comparison of Workloads by Demand Zone 31 Description of First Arriving Unit Performance 37 First Arriving Unit Response Time by Station Demand Zone 37 EFFECTIVE RESPONSE FORCE CAPABILITIES 40 RELIABILITY FACTORS 43 Percentage of Department Compliance 43 Percentage of First Due Compliance 43 Call Concurrency 44 BASELINE PERFORMANCE TABLES 45 FIGURE 1: FD1: NUMBER OF INCIDENTS DISPATCHED BY CATEGORY-2014 2 FIGURE 2: FD1: NUMBER OF RESPONSES, AND TOTAL BUSY TIME BY JURISDICTION -2014 2 FIGURE 3: EDMONDS: NUMBER OF INCIDENTS DISPATCHED BY CATEGORY-2014 3 FIGURE 4: EDMONDS: PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL INCIDENTS DISPATCHED BY CATEGORY 3 FIGURE 5: EDMONDS: NUMBER OF RESPONSES, AND TOTAL BUSY TIME BY CATEGORY- 2014 3 FIGURE 6: MUTUAL AID IN AND OUT EDMONDS BY CATEGORY- 2014 4 FIGURE 7: OVERALL: AVERAGE CALLS PER DAY BY MONTH 4 FIGURE 8: OVERALL: AVERAGE CALLS PER DAY BY WEEKDAY 5 FIGURE 9: OVERALL: AVERAGE CALLS PER DAY BY HOUR 6 FIGURE 10: OVERALL WORKLOAD BY FD1 STATIONS FOR EDMONDS INCIDENTS-2014 6 FIGURE 11: OVERALL WORKLOAD BY UNIT FOR EDMONDS INCIDENTS- 2014 7 FIGURE 12: WORKLOAD ANALYSIS FOR STATION 20 BY UNIT-2014 8 FIGURE 13. AVERAGE TURNOUT AND TRAVEL TIME BY CATEGORY 9 FIGURE 14: AVERAGE TURNOUT AND TRAVEL TIME BY CALL CATEGORY 9 FIGURE 15: 90TH PERCENTILE TURNOUT AND TRAVEL TIME OF FIRST ARRIVING UNITS BY CALL CATEGORY 9 FIGURE 16: NUMBER AND PERCENTAGE OF CALLS RESPONDED BY APPARATUS TYPE 10 FIGURE 17: TOTAL FIRE RELATED CALLS PER MONTH OF 2014 11 Edmonds, Washington Page i © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 353 8.2.c FIGURE 18: AVERAGE FIRE RELATED CALLS PER MONTH OF 2014 11 FIGURE 19: TOTAL FIRE RELATED CALLS BY DAY OF WEEK FOR 2014 12 FIGURE 20: AVERAGE FIRE RELATED CALLS BY DAY OF WEEK FOR 2014 12 FIGURE 21: TOTAL AND AVERAGE FIRE RELATED CALLS BY HOUR OF DAY FOR 2014 13 FIGURE 22: AVERAGE FIRE RELATED CALLS PER DAY BY HOUR OF DAY IN 2014 14 FIGURE 23: FIRE RELATED FINAL CAD INCIDENT TYPES 14 FIGURE 24: NUMBER OF RESPONDING UNITS FOR FIRE CALLS 15 FIGURE 25: WORKLOAD BY UNIT FOR FIRE CALLS 16 FIGURE 26: ANNUAL TOTAL AND AVERAGE PER DAY OF BLS CALLS BY MONTH OF YEAR 17 FIGURE 27: AVERAGE BLS CALLS PER DAY BY MONTH OF YEAR 18 FIGURE 28: ANNUAL TOTAL AND AVERAGE PER DAY OF BLS CALLS BY DAY OF WEEK 18 FIGURE 29: AVERAGE BLS CALLS PER DAY BY DAY OF WEEK 19 FIGURE 30: ANNUAL TOTAL AND AVERAGE PER DAY OF BLS CALLS BY HOUR OF DAY 20 FIGURE 31: AVERAGE BLS CALLS PER DAY BY HOUR OF DAY 21 FIGURE 32: WORKLOAD BY UNIT FOR BLS CALLS 22 FIGURE 33: ANNUAL TOTAL AND AVERAGE PER DAY OF ALS CALLS BY MONTH OF YEAR 23 FIGURE 34: AVERAGE ALS CALLS PER DAY BY MONTH 23 FIGURE 35: ANNUAL TOTAL AND AVERAGE PER DAY OF ALS REQUESTS BY DAY OF WEEK 24 FIGURE 36: AVERAGE ALS CALLS PER DAY BY DAY OF WEEK 24 FIGURE 37: ANNUAL TOTAL AND AVERAGE PER DAY OF ALS REQUESTS BY HOUR OF DAY 25 FIGURE 38: AVERAGE ALS CALLS PER DAY BY HOUR OF DAY 26 FIGURE 39: WORKLOAD BY UNIT FOR ALS CALLS 27 FIGURE 40: EMS TRANSPORTS BY CALL CATEGORY 28 FIGURE 41: AVERAGE BLS/ALS CALLS AND BLS/ALS TRANSPORTS PER DAY BY HOUR OF DAY 28 FIGURE 42: TOTAL BLS/ALS CALLS AND BLS/ALS TRANSPORTS AND AVERAGE PER DAY BY HOUR OF DAY 29 FIGURE 43: FD1 UNIT WORKLOAD BY STATION DEMAND ZONE 31 FIGURE 44: DEPARTMENT WORKLOAD BY STATION DEMAND ZONE FOR EDMONDS INCIDENTS 32 FIGURE 45: DISTRIBUTION OF DEPARTMENT WORKLOAD BY CALL TYPE 32 FIGURE 46: WITHIN STATION PROPORTION OF WORKLOAD BY CALL TYPE 33 FIGURE 47: NUMBER OF RESPONSES BY STATION DEMAND ZONE AND CALL TYPE FOR EDMONDS INCIDENTS 33 FIGURE 48: 2014 UNIT WORKLOAD ANALYSES BY UNIT AND CALL CATEGORY FOR EDMONDS INCIDENTS 34 FIGURE 49: 2014 NUMBER OF DISPATCHES BY UNIT TO EDMONDS INCIDENTS 35 FIGURE 50: FIRE DISTRICT VS STAFFING MODEL 36 FIGURE 51: UNIT HOUR UTILIZATIONS 36 FIGURE 52: DESCRIPTION OF FIRSTARRIVING UNIT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PERFORMANCE 37 FIGURE 53: MEAN FIRSTARRIVAL PERFORMANCE BY FIRST DUE STATION 37 FIGURE 54: 90TH PERCENTILE FIRST ARRIVAL PERFORMANCE BY STATION FDZ 38 FIGURE 55: 90TH PERCENTILE FIRST ARRIVAL PERFORMANCE BY STATION FDZ 38 FIGURE 56: 90TH PERCENTILE TURNOUT TIME BY STATION FDZ 39 FIGURE 57: 90TH PERCENTILE TRAVEL TIME PERFORMANCE BY STATION FDZ 39 FIGURE 58: 90TH PERCENTILE TURNOUT AND TRAVEL PERFORMANCE BY STATION FDZ 39 FIGURE 59: ERF TRAVEL PERFORMANCE FOR STATION 16 40 FIGURE 60: ERF TRAVEL PERFORMANCE FOR STATION 17 41 FIGURE 61: ERF TRAVEL PERFORMANCE FOR STATION 20 41 FIGURE 62: 90T" PERCENTILE ERF TRAVEL PERFORMANCE FOR STATION 16 41 FIGURE 63: 90TH PERCENTILE ERF TRAVEL PERFORMANCE FOR STATION 17 42 Edmonds, Washington Page ii © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 354 8.2.c FIGURE 64: 90TI PERCENTILE ERF TRAVEL PERFORMANCE FOR STATION 20 42 FIGURE 65: HISTORICAL MEAN AND 90TH PERCENTILE TRAVEL TIME PERFORMANCE FOR ERF BY STATION FDZ 42 FIGURE 66: PERCENTAGE RELIABILITY BY STATION FDZ 43 FIGURE 67: PERCENTAGE RELIABILITY BY STATION FDZ 44 FIGURE 68: CALL CONCURRENCY FOR 2014 BY FIRST DUE STATION 44 FIGURE 69: CALL CONCURRENCY FOR 2014 BY STATION FDZ 45 FIGURE 70: BASELINE PERFORMANCE FOR EMS (BLS/ALS) INCIDENTS-2012/2014 46 FIGURE 71: BASELINE PERFORMANCE FOR FIRE INCIDENTS-2012/2014 46 FIGURE 72: SUMMARY OF 90TH PERCENTILE PERFORMANCE FOR EMS (BLS/ALS) INCIDENTS— 2012/2014 47 FIGURE 73: SUMMARY OF 90TH PERCENTILE PERFORMANCE FOR FIRE INCIDENTS— 2012/2014 47 Edmonds, Washington Page iii © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 355 8.2.c METHODOLOGY Requests for FD1 units are dispatched through SNOCOM 911 including Edmonds incidents. We collected three years of data from SNOCOM for all FD1's responses. We presented the total incidents and total unit responses of FD1 units in the figures below. In 2014, Edmonds calls accounted for 29 percent of the total calls FD1 units have responded to. Figure 6 below includes units at station 16, 17 and 20's responses to calls outside Edmonds. In the rest of the report, we limit our discussions to Edmonds calls in 2014. We provide dispatch time, turnout, and travel time performance benchmark using the three years of Edmonds calls in the last section. In this report, we utilized two distinct measures of call volume and workload. First, is the number of requests for service that are defined as either "dispatches" or "calls." Dispatches/calls are the number of times a distinct incident was created for the Snohomish County Fire District 1. Conversely, "responses" are the number of times that an individual unit (or units) responded to a call. Responses will be utilized on all Unit and Station level analyses, which account for all elements of workload and performance. Calls have been categorized as EMS (BLS), EMS-ALS, Fire, Special Operations, and Service, respectively. The CAD system did not capture the time an emergency request was initiated by citizens for all incidents. Therefore, in our response time analysis, we did not provide analysis on dispatch time, and focused our discussions on turnout time, and travel time for lights and sirens responses. We only discussed the dispatch performances in the designated figures. Edmonds, Washington Page 1 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 356 8.2.c COMMUNITY RESPONSE HISTORY In 2014, Fire District 1 responded to a total of 15,883 requests for service, or dispatches. EMS service requests totaled 13,407, accounting for 84.4% of the total number of incidents. The number of fire related calls were 1,841, which accounted for 11.6% of the dispatched incidents. Again, the number of individual unit responses will be more reflective of total department workload since 47 percent of the calls resulted in multiple units dispatched. As summarized below, all units in FD1 combined made 27,447 responses, and were busy on emergency calls 17,429 hours. On average, each response lasted 38 minutes from dispatched to clear. Requests in Edmonds accounted for 29 percent of the total incidents FD1 units have responded to. Edmonds requests averaged 12.6 per day. EMS calls totaled 3,945, which accounted for 85.5% of the total Edmonds incidents. Fire calls totaled 450, which accounted for 9.8%. FD1 units made 7,372 responses to Edmonds calls and on average the busy minutes per response was 29 minutes, which was shorter than the other FD1 calls. In terms of busy hours. FD1 units spent 3,605 unit hours responding to calls in Edmonds, which accounted for 21 percent of FD1's 2014 annual busy hours. Forty percent (40%) of the Edmonds requests resulted in multiple FD1 units responding. The figures below include FD1's all responses. Figure 6includes units at station 16, 17 and 20's responses to calls outside Edmonds. In the rest of the report, we limit our discussions for Edmonds calls. Figure 1: FD1: Number of Incidents Dispatched by Category — 2014 Call Category EMS Edmonds 2,547 District Fire 6,277 OtherNumber of Calls 39 8,863 EMS-ALS 1,398 2,993 153 4,544 Fire 450 1,268 123 1,841 Special Ops 8 8 12 28 Service 210 395 2 607 Total 4,613 10,941 329 15,883 Percentage 29% 1 69% 2% 100% Calls per day 12.6 1 30.0 0.9 43.5 Figure 2: FD1: Number of Responses, and Total Busy Time by Jurisdiction — 2014 Number of Jurisdiction Number of Average Total Responses Busy Average Busy Minutes per Calls Responses per Call Hours Response Edmonds, Washington Page 2 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 357 8.2.c Figure 3: Edmonds: Number of Incidents Dispatched by Category — 2014 Call Category EMS Number of Calls 2,547 Calls per Day Call Percentage 7.0 55.2 EMS-ALS 1,398 3.8 30.3 Fire 450 1.2 9.8 Special Ops 8 0.0 0.2 Service 210 0.6 4.6 Total 4,613 12.6 100.0 Figure 4: Edmonds: Percentage of Total Incidents Dispatched by Category Total Number of Incidents: 4,613 0.2W ■ EMS EMS-ALS ■ Fire 4.6% 9,8q ■Special Ops Service 55•2% 30.3% Figure 5: Edmonds: Number of Responses, and Total Busy Time by Category — 2014 Call Category Number of Calls Number of Responses Average Responses per Call Total Busy Hours Average Busy Minutes per Response Stations 16, 17 and 20 are staffed to primarily respond to Edmonds emergency requests. The units in the three stations combined have made 784 responses to 583 incidents in the district. Please note those dispatches are outside Edmonds, and thus not included in the major body of the report. Units in other Edmonds, Washington Page 3 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 358 8.2.c FD1's stations have made 686 responses to calls in Edmonds, and units from other fire agencies have provided 314 responses to calls in Edmonds. Figure 6: Mutual Aid in and out Edmonds by Category — 2014 Stations 16, 17 and 20 into Other FDV stations into Other Fire Agencies into Call Category g Y District Number of Fire Number Total Number Edmonds Total Number Number Edmonds Total Number Calls of Runs Busy Hours of Calls of Runs Busy Hours of Calls of Runs Busy Hours Temporal analyses were conducted to evaluate patterns in community demands. These measures examined the frequency of requests for service in 2014 by month, day of week, and hour of day. In the following temporal analysis, special ops and service calls were grouped into fire category for presentation purpose. Overall, average calls per month ranged from a low of 10.4 per day in March to a high of 13.3 per day in November. The top three months with the most demands in the descending order are: November (13.3 per day), July (13.0 per day) and January (12.8 per day). Figure 7: Overall: Average Calls per Day by Month 16 14 12 8 12 11,4 10.4 10 8 6 - 4 - 2 - 4- �yc� aia a�c'S Average Calls per Day by Month 13.0 13.3 12.4 12.2 12.4 11.5 11.1 M . = 11.5 , 12.5 �°A ■ Fire ■ BLS ■ ALS a+ a Edmonds, Washington Page 4 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 359 8.2.c Similar analyses were conducted for requests by day of week. The data revealed that there is little variability in the demand for services by day of week. Monday was the low for the week at 602 calls or 11.6 calls per day. Friday has the highest frequency of requests for services at 656 calls or 12.6 calls per day. Figure 8: Overall: Average Calls per Day by Weekday 16 14 12.0 11.6 12 � 10 8 6 4 2 0 Sunday Monday Average Calls per Day by Weekday 12.5 11.7 12.0 Tuesday Wednesday Thursday ■ Fire ■BLS ■ ALS 12.6 12.0 Friday Saturday Overall demands were evaluated by the hour of the day. Considerable variability exists in the time of day that requests for emergency services are received. The hours that include midnight to 0500 are below one standard deviation for this data set. While the middle of the day has the greatest frequency of calls, specifically the hours that begin at 1100 and 1800 are above 225 calls in a year. The average number of calls per hour is 183. The data illustrates that the busiest times of the day are between 1100 and 1800. To provide a more granular understanding of the community's demand for emergency services, this temporal analysis included the average number of calls per hour. In other words, when referring to the figure below, the busiest hour is at 1100 with 268 calls during that hour in 2014. The average number of calls per hour is a daily average for those 268 calls if they were equally distributed. Therefore, the busiest hour per day would be at 1100 with an average hourly call volume of less than 1 at 0.73 calls per hour. Edmonds, Washington Page 5 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 360 8.2.c Figure 9: Overall: Average Calls per Day by Hour Average Calls per Day by Hour 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.65 0.73 0.680 0.700.72 0.71 0.67 0.65 0 62 .63 0.6 0.590.590.56 0.55 0.5 044 0.43 0.4 0.35 0.37 0.3 0.270.27 0.2 0130.200.210. 23 0.1 0.0 - 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ■Fire ■BLS ■ALS Overall, FD1's units made 7,372 unit responses to incidents in Edmonds, and the total busy hours were 3,605 hours. Stations 16, 17 and 20's responses accounted for 89.5% of the total unit responses. M17, A17, and A16 were the top three busiest units, and their average responses per day were 3.8, 3.4 and 3.3 respectively. Figure 10: Overall Workload by FD1 Stations for Edmonds Incidents- 2014 Station 10 Minutes per Response 32.8 Annual Busy Hours 65.5 Annual Total ResponsesAvg.Busy 120 Percentage of Total .. 1.6% 11 11.0 7.2 39 0.5% 12 15.5 1.3 5 0.1% 13 11.4 1.0 5 0.1% 16 25.9 794.3 1,839 24.9% 17 33.7 1,680.8 2,993 40.6% 18 20.0 6.7 20 0.3% 19 21.3 122.0 343 4.7% 20 29.0 848.3 1,756 23.8% 21 19.5 73.1 225 3.1% 22 6.7 2.2 20 0.3% 23 20.3 0.7 2 0.0% NA 18.6 1.6 5 0.1% FD1 Total 29.3 3,604.5 7,372 100.0% Note: This table only reflects workload associated with calls run into Edmonds. Edmonds, Washington Page 6 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 361 8.2.c Figure 11: Overall Workload by Unit for Edmonds Incidents - 2014 Description Unit Report Air light unit AIR10 Avg. Busy Minutes r peStation Response 24.9 AnnualBusy 2.1 Annual Total Responses 5 Engine E10 28.9 26.0 54 10 Medic M10 36.8 37.4 61 Station 10 Total 32.8 65.5 120 11 Battalion B11 11.0 7.2 39 12 Decon unit DCON12 15.5 1.3 5 13 Engine E13 11.4 1.0 5 Aid unit A16 29.5 586.5 1,191 Battalion B16 18.1 94.9 314 16 Engine E16 19.5 99.0 304 Marine boat MAR16 46.2 6.2 8 Medical Services Officer MS016 21.0 7.7 22 Station 16 Total 25.9 794.3 1,839 Aid unit A17 32.9 688.7 1,257 17 Engine E17 21.2 117.8 334 Medic M17 37.4 874.3 1,402 Station 17 Total 33.7 1,680.8 2,993 Engine E18 27.0 2.3 5 18 Medic M18 17.6 4.4 15 Station 18 Total 20.0 6.7 20 Engine E19 16.0 24.3 91 19 Medic M19 23.3 97.7 252 Station 19 Total 21.3 122.0 343 Aid unit A20 28.9 186.5 387 Engine E20 16.2 0.8 3 20 Ladder(quint) L20 21.2 129.6 367 Medic M20 31.9 531.3 999 Station 20 Total 29.0 848.3 1,756 Aid unit A21 23.0 1.9 5 Battalion B21 9.4 0.3 2 21 Medic M21 11.5 1.5 8 Medical Services Officer MS021 21.1 63.9 182 Technical Rescue TR21 11.7 5.5 28 Station 21 Total 19.5 73.1 225 Engine E22 2.3 0.7 17 22 Medic M22 31.4 1.6 3 Station 22 Total 6.7 2.2 20 23 Ladder(quint) L23 20.3 0.7 2 Bike BK17 21.8 1.5 4 NA Medical Services Officer MS011 6.2 0.1 1 Fire District 1 Total 29.3 3,604.5 7,372 Edmonds, Washington Page 7 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 362 8.2.c Units staffed in Station 20 have made 1,756 responses, and of these, 175 responses were to calls in grids of 55, 56, 105 and 106, which accounted for 10% of the station total. Figure 12: Workload Analysis for Station 20 by Unit — 2014 Overall Grids 55, 56, 105 and 106 Description Unit Number of Runs Total Busy Number of Runs Total Busy Hours Aid unit A20 387 Hours 186.5 39 19.4 Engine E20 3 0.8 1 0.2 Ladder (quint) L20 367 129.6 38 15.1 Medic M20 999 531.3 97 50.6 Station 20 Total 1,756 848.3 175 85.3 Percentage of Total 100% 100% 10% 10% Note: The grids utilized most closely approximate the geographic area of Esperance Currently, the CAD data from SNOCOM 911 only captures the dispatch interval as part of an integrated case number for 79 percent of incidents. For the purposes of this study, the dispatch interval is the time from phone ring at SNOCOM 911 to the dispatching and alerting of the unit. We discussed the dispatch time performances from 2012 to 2014 in the last four figures. The average dispatch time from 2012 to 2014 was 46 seconds, and the 90th percentile was 73 seconds (one minute and 13 seconds). It is recommended that SNOCOM 911 align their dispatch and call processing data with the incident data for all incidents. This would allow agencies to evaluate the entire continuum of response capability from the perspective of the person experiencing an emergency. This will be an important element for the District and City of Edmonds if they elect to seek accreditation through the Center for Public Safety Excellence's (CPSE) Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI). The major body of this report focuses on FD1's performance including turnout time, travel time, and the combined turnout and travel that best reflects total response time not including the dispatch interval. This analysis utilized all distinct incidents dispatched for emergency (priority 1 and 2 calls) responses inclusive of all call categories. The mean (average) turnout time was 102 seconds (one minute and 42 seconds), travel time was 216 seconds (three minutes 36 seconds), and travel and turnout combined was 318 seconds (five minutes 18 seconds). The figure below reports the average response performance by call category. However, a more conservative and reliable measure of performance is the percentile. This measure is more robust, or less influenced by outliers, than measures of central tendency such as the mean. Best practice is to measure at the 901h percentile. In other words, 90% of all performance is captured expecting that 10% of the time the department may experience abnormal conditions that would typically be considered an outlier. For example, if the department were to report an average response time of six minutes, then in a normally distributed set of data, half of the responses would be longer Edmonds, Washington Page 8 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 363 8.2.c than six minutes and half of the responses would be less than six minutes. The 90t" percentile communicates that 9 out of 10 times the department performance is predictable and thus more clearly articulated to policy makers and the community. The performance for turnout time at the 90t" percentile is 153 seconds (two minutes and 33 seconds), travel time is 343 seconds (5 minutes and 43 seconds), and turnout and travel combined is 449 seconds (seven minutes and 29 seconds). Figure 15 below reports 90th percentile performance by call category. Please note that the summation of 90th percentile turnout time and 90th percentile travel time is not the same as 90th percentile turnout and travel time. Figure 13. Average Turnout and Travel Time by Category Category EMS Turnout Time 1.6 Travel Time 3.8 ResponseCall 5.4 2,471 EMS-ALS 1.6 3.2 4.8 1,376 Fire 2.1 3.9 6.0 422 Special Ops 1.8 2.1 4.0 8 Total 1.7 3.6 5.3 4,277 Figure 14: Average Turnout and Travel Time by Call Category Figure 15: 90th Percentile Turnout and Travel Time of First Arriving Units by Call Category Category EMS Turnout Time 2.5 Travel Time 5.9 ResponseCall 7.5 2,471 EMS-ALS 2.4 5.1 6.9 1,376 Fire 2.9 6.6 8.5 422 Special Ops 2.3 7.4 9.4 8 Total 2.6 5.7 7.5 4,277 Edmonds, Washington Page 9 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 364 8.2.c Typically, performance varies across call types or categories due to a variety of reasons. For example, the turnout time may be longer for fire related calls because the crews have to dress in their personal protective ensemble (bunker gear) prior to leaving the station where as on an EMS incident they do not. Similarly, the larger fire apparatus may require longer response times due to their size and lack of maneuverability. However, the data only includes emergency responses; data does suggest mean and 90th percentile turnout time for fire calls were longer than EMS calls. As expected, significant variability is introduced in responses for special operation calls. Since there are only 8 special operation calls used in this analysis, the 90th percentile is essentially the longest time. Potentially, the primary reason that there is variability between EMS, EMS-ALS, and Fire incident performance is that the department deploys different fire apparatus on different call types. The utilization of each apparatus type is provided in the figure below. BLS aid units have responded to 60.4 percent of the total requests, ALS medic units have responded to 50.3 percent of the total requests, and engines have responded to 16.4 percent of the total requests. Since a significant percentage of incidents receive multiple units and unit types responding on an individual call, the data will not sum to 100%. Figure 16: Number and Percentage of Calls Responded by Apparatus Type Apparatus Aid unit 2,784 60.4 Medic 2,322 50.3 Engine 756 16.4 Ladder (quint) 368 8.0 Battalion 325 7.0 Medical Services Officer 191 4.1 Technical Rescue 28 0.6 Marine boat 8 0.2 Air light unit 5 0.1 Decon unit 5 0.1 Bike unit 4 0.1 Fire Related Services Temporal analyses were conducted to evaluate patterns in community demands for fire related services These measures examined the frequency of requests for service in 2014 by month, day of week, and hour of day. Results found that there were slightly more fire related calls in the second half of the year (July to December), and peaked in November. Average calls per month ranged from a low of 0.8 in May to a high of 1.8 per day in November. Results are presented below in the figures below. Edmonds, Washington Page 10 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 365 8.2.c Figure 17. Total Fire Related Calls per Month of 2014 Month January Number of Calls 38 Calls per Day 1.2 Call Percentage 8.5 February 36 1.3 6.2 March 34 1.1 7.9 April 30 1.0 7.0 May 25 0.8 7.3 June 39 1.3 7.7 July 47 1.5 9.4 August 43 1.4 9.2 September 37 1.2 8.1 October 28 0.9 7.3 November 55 1.8 9.2 December 38 1.2 12.2 Total 450 1.2 100.0 Figure 18: Average Fire Related Calls per Month of 2014 Average Fire Calls per Day by Month 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 1acJa� etJasa ��<r P��\ �a4 lSre ,�\y Qa�Jfi ;��e` ICPL de aO a O¢ e Similar analyses were conducted for fire related calls per day of week. The data revealed that there is little variability in the demand for services by day of week. Monday was the low for the week at 59 calls or 13.1% of the fire related calls for the week. Sunday and Wednesday have the highest frequency of requests for fire related services at 67 calls or 14.9%. Results for this analysis are presented in the figures below. Edmonds, Washington Page 11 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 366 8.2.c Figure 19: Total Fire Related Calls by Day of Week for 2014 D. Sunday 67 Day 1.3 Call Percentage 14.9 Monday 59 1.1 13.1 Tuesday 66 1.3 14.7 Wednesday 67 1.3 14.9 Thursday 66 1.2 14.7 Friday 63 1.2 14.0 Saturday 62 1.2 13.8 Total 450 1.2 100.0 Figure 20: Average Fire Related Calls by Day of Week for 2014 Average Fire Calls per Day by Day of Week 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Fire related calls were evaluated by the hour of the day. Considerable variability exists in the time of day that requests for fire related services are received. The hours that include midnight to 0600 are below one standard deviation for this data set. While the middle of the day has the greatest frequency of calls, specifically the hours that begin at 1400 and 1800 are above 30 calls in a year. The average number of calls per hour is 19. The data illustrates that the busiest times of the day for fire related incidents are between 0800 and 2200. Finally, in an effort to provide a more granular understanding of the community's demand for fire related services, this temporal analysis included the average number of calls per hour. In other words, when referring to the figure below, the busiest hour is at 1400 with 45 calls during that hour in 2014. The average number of calls per hour is a daily average for those 35 calls if they were equally Edmonds, Washington Page 12 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 367 8.2.c distributed. Therefore, the busiest hour per day would be at 1400 with an average hourly call volume of less than 1 at 0.10 calls per hour. The results are in the figures below. Figure 21: Total and Average Fire Related Calls by Hour of Day for 2014 Hour of Day 0 Number of Calls 8 Calls per Hour 0.02 Call Percentage 1.8 1 13 0.04 2.9 2 5 0.01 1.1 3 4 0.01 0.9 4 5 0.01 1.1 5 4 0.01 0.9 6 14 0.04 3.1 7 14 0.04 3.1 8 28 0.08 6.2 9 24 0.07 5.3 10 27 0.07 6.0 11 26 0.07 5.8 12 25 0.07 5.6 13 21 0.06 4.7 14 35 0.10 7.8 15 22 0.06 4.9 16 20 0.05 4.4 17 28 0.08 6.2 18 32 0.09 7.1 19 25 0.07 5.6 20 22 0.06 4.9 21 23 0.06 5.1 22 14 0.04 3.1 23 11 0.03 2.4 Total 450 1.23 100.0 Edmonds, Washington Page 13 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 368 8.2.c Figure 22: Average Fire Related Calls per Day by Hour of Day in 2014 Average Fire Calls per Day by Hour 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 T16E19 N2223 For these analyses, "Fire Related" incidents are an aggregated category of the various final incident types available in the Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) database. The department utilizes these CAD final incident types to accurately dispatch and categorize fire related call types. In 2014, the most frequent community demand for fire suppression services was for fire single engine response at 148 requests, followed by fire alarm commercial at 136. According to the final call incident type captured at the end of the call, full responses to commercial fires totaled 12 and full responses for residential fires totaled 11. The CAD final incident types included in "Fire" dispatches with the corresponding number of calls and their percentages are provided below. Figure 23: Fire Related Final CAD Incident Types Final Type FS Final Type Description Fire Single Engine response Number of Calls 148 Percentage of Fire Related Demands 32.9 Percentage of Total 3.2 FAC Fire Alarm Commercial 136 30.2 2.9 FAR Fire Alarm Residential 63 14.0 1.3 COA Carbon Monoxide Alarm 27 6.0 0.6 MU Move Up 20 4.4 0.4 GLO Gas Leak Outside 18 4.0 0.4 FC Fire Commercial 12 2.7 0.3 FIR Fire Residential 11 2.4 0.2 GLI Gas Leak Inside 8 1.8 0.2 FAS Fire Alarm Sprinkler Water flow 4 0.9 0.1 FB Fire Brush 2 0.4 0.0 MVCE Motor Vehicle Collision with Entrapment 1 0.2 0.0 Edmonds, Washington Page 14 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 369 8.2.c When referring the figure above, fire single engine responses (FS) are incidents handled by a single engine such as a trash can fire or vehicle fire. Fire alarms for both residential structures (FAR) and commercial structures (FAC) are responses because the alarm sounded, however, if there was an actual fire it would typically be categorized as fire commercial (FC) or fire residential (FR), respectively. In total, structural fire incidents (FC/FR) accounted for just over 5% of the fire related incidents and less than 1% of the total demand for services from the community. Eighty percent (80%) of the fire requests were responded to by a single FD1 unit. On average, 1.6 units were dispatched per BLS call. The department made a total of 733 unit responses to fire related calls. The total time on task was 257 hours, and the average time on task was 21 minutes. Ladder L20 is the most utilized unit in fire related calls, followed by Engines E17 and E16. Figure 24: Number of Responding Units for Fire Calls Number of Responding Units Number of Calls Percent of Total Cumulative Percent Average Call Duration (minutes) Total 450 21.8 Edmonds, Washington Page 15 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 370 8.2.c Figure 25: Workload by Unit for Fire Calls Station Apparatus Apparatus Type Aid unit A17 Avg. Busy Minutes per ResponseResponses 15.8 Annual Busy 2.6 Annual Total 10 17 Engine E17 23.2 65.6 170 Medic M17 24.5 11.4 28 Station 17 Total 23.0 79.7 208 Aid unit A16 10.2 0.3 2 Battalion B16 29.8 22.4 45 16 Engine E16 20.9 49.5 142 Medical Services Officer MSO16 6.9 0.3 3 Station 16 Total 22.7 72.5 192 Aid unit A20 36.3 1.8 3 Engine E20 11.6 0.2 1 20 Ladder (quint) L20 21.6 63.7 177 Medic M20 11.2 0.6 3 Station 20 Total 21.6 66.3 184 13 Engine E13 1.3 0.1 4 Battalion B21 9.4 0.3 2 21 Medical Services Officer MSO21 18.7 7.8 25 Technical Rescue TR21 13.2 4.8 22 Station 21 Total 15.9 12.9 49 11 Battalion B11 11.1 4.3 23 Engine E22 2.3 0.7 17 22 Medic M22 0.0 0.0 1 Station 22 Total 2.2 0.7 18 Engine E19 17.8 6.8 23 19 Medic M19 39.6 5.9 9 Station 19 Total 23.9 12.8 32 Air light unit AIR10 24.9 2.1 5 10 Engine E10 19.8 2.0 6 Medic M10 18.9 0.3 1 Station 30 Total 21.8 4.4 12 Engine E18 28.2 1.9 4 18 Medic M18 6.2 0.3 3 Station 18 Total 18.7 2.2 7 23 Ladder(quint) L23 9.7 0.2 1 12 Decon unit DCON12 9.8 0.5 3 Fire District 1 Total 21.0 256.5 733 Emergency Medical Services The City of Edmonds provides Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in a multi -tiered system. The first layer is a first responder layer provided primarily by a BLS or ALS unit. Requests for EMS are categorized as Edmonds, Washington Page 16 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 371 8.2.c either Basic Life Support (BLS) or Advanced Life Support (ALS). The vast majority of BLS patients are either treated and released or treated and care is transferred to local hospitals. An EMS request for ALS services also receives one of the medic units that provide both treatment and all ALS patient transportation services. Temporal analyses were completed to describe the community's demands for emergency medical services. These analyses were completed for BLS and ALS calls. First, month of year, day of week, and hour of day BLS calls are categorized for 2014. Results found that there were slightly more BLS related calls in the second half of the year (July to December), and peaked in July. Average calls per month ranged from a low of 5.6 in March to a high of 8.0 per day in July and November. Results are presented in tabular form as Table 18 and Figure 9 below Figure 26: Annual Total and Average per Day of BLS Calls by Month of Year Month January Number of Calls 201 Calls per Day 6.5 Call Percentage 8.5 February 166 5.9 6.2 March 175 5.6 7.9 April 208 6.9 7.0 May 196 6.3 7.3 June 203 6.8 7.7 July 249 8.0 9.4 August 238 7.7 9.2 September 216 7.2 8.1 October 242 7.8 7.3 November 239 8.0 9.2 December 214 6.9 12.2 Total 2,547 7.0 100.0 Edmonds, Washington Page 17 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 372 8.2.c Figure 27: Average BLS Calls per Day by Month of Year Average BLS Calls per Day by Month 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Kk ca r P �` �a� lJae �,�J Pa�a� w� cek p110 o , ei `spec Q� c oe em Similar analyses were conducted examining the frequency of requests for service by the day of the week. There is minor variability in the demand for services by the day of the week. Thursday and Friday receive the most requests for service and Monday and Tuesday the least. Results are provided in the figures below. Figure 28: Annual Total and Average per Day of BLS Calls by Day of Week �.Calls Sunday 363 per Day 7.0 Call Percentage 14.3 Monday 347 6.7 13.6 Tuesday 342 6.6 13.4 Wednesday 367 7.1 14.4 Thursday 387 7.3 15.2 Friday 381 7.3 15.0 Saturday 360 6.9 14.1 Total 2,547 7.0 100.0 Edmonds, Washington Page 18 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 373 8.2.c Figure 29: Average BLS Calls per Day by Day of Week Average BLS Calls per Day by Day of Week 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Finally, the analyses for BLS services are concluded by identifying the BLS calls by hour of day and the average hourly rate of BLS calls per hour. The demand curve for requests for BLS service follows an expected pattern experienced in similar communities across the nation. The higher frequency of service calls begins in the morning at 0900 and continues to increase and peaks at 1300, then starts to decrease. The average hourly rate of service requests does not exceed 0.44 for any hour during the day with the peak occurring at 1300. There are 0.29 calls on average and a low at 0300 of 0.12 calls on average during that hour. During the 6 hour period from midnight to 0600, the average per day is 0.83, which means the department on average responded to 0.83 BLS calls per day from midnight to 0600. Results are provided in the figures below. Edmonds, Washington Page 19 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 374 8.2.c Figure 30: Annual Total and Average per Day of BLS Calls by Hour of Day Hour of Day 0 Number of Calls 61 Calls per Hour 0.17 Call Percentage 2.4 1 54 0.15 2.1 2 55 0.15 2.2 3 43 0.12 1.7 4 48 0.13 1.9 5 44 0.12 1.7 6 74 0.20 2.9 7 87 0.24 3.4 8 98 0.27 3.8 9 142 0.39 5.6 10 128 0.35 5.0 11 145 0.40 5.7 12 140 0.38 5.5 13 160 0.44 6.3 14 157 0.43 6.2 15 136 0.37 5.3 16 151 0.41 5.9 17 132 0.36 5.2 18 135 0.37 5.3 19 118 0.32 4.6 20 138 0.38 5.4 21 118 0.32 4.6 22 96 0.26 3.8 23 87 0.24 3.4 Total 2,547 6.98 100.0 Edmonds, Washington Page 20 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 375 8.2.c Figure 31: Average BLS Calls per Day by Hour of Day Eighty-four (84%) percent of the BLS calls were responded to by a single FD1 unit. On average, 1.2 units were dispatched per BLS call. The department made a total of 3,181 responses to BLS calls. The total time on task was 1,503 hours, and the average time on task was 28 minutes. Aid/BLS A17 is the most utilized unit, followed by A16 and M20. Edmonds, Washington Page 21 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 376 8.2.c figure .sz: worKioaa Station oy unir ror M3 cans Description Unit ReportAvg Engine E10 Busy Run 31.2 15.6 30 10 Medic M10 35.6 20.2 34 Station 10 Total 33.5 35.8 64 11 Battalion B11 9.0 1.2 8 12 Decon unit DCON12 40.1 0.7 1 13 Engine E13 51.6 0.9 1 Aid unit A16 28.0 318.6 682 Battalion B16 14.1 39.0 166 Engine E16 14.8 18.7 76 16 Marine boat 42,079.0 32.9 0.5 1 Medical Services Officer MS016 23.1 1.2 3 Station 16 Total 24.4 378.0 928 Aid unit A17 32.6 436.8 804 Engine E17 17.8 17.8 60 17 Medic M17 31.9 62.7 118 Station 17 Total 31.6 517.3 982 Engine E18 22.4 0.4 1 18 Medic M18 21.1 1.4 4 Station 18 Total 21.3 1.8 5 Engine E19 17.1 7.4 26 19 Medic M19 24.8 50.5 122 Station 19 Total 23.5 57.9 148 Aid unit A20 28.5 122.7 258 Engine E20 18.5 0.6 2 20 Ladder(quint) L20 20.7 30.1 87 Medic M20 31.6 346.6 659 Station 20 Total 29.8 500.0 1,006 Aid unit A21 23.0 1.9 5 Medic M21 5.4 0.4 5 21 Medical Services Officer MS021 10.8 4.0 22 Station 21 Total 11.9 6.3 32 22 Medic M22 47.1 1 1.6 2 NA Bike BK17 21.8 1.5 4 Fire District 1 Total 28.3 1,502.8 3,181 Temporal analyses were completed for requests for ALS service as well. January has the greatest frequency of calls, and September has the fewest number of ALS requests. Similarly, the calls were Edmonds, Washington Page 22 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 377 8.2.c analyzed by day of week showing that Wednesday and Friday were the busiest of the days of the week and Thursday the least busy. The figures below provide the summary of this data. Figure 33: Annual Total and Average per Day of ALS Calls by Month of Year Month January Number of Calls 158 Calls per Day 5.1 Call Percentage 8.5 February 118 4.2 6.2 March 113 3.6 7.9 April 108 3.6 7.0 May 122 3.9 7.3 June 129 4.3 7.7 July 107 3.5 9.4 August 97 3.1 9.2 September 92 3.1 8.1 October 115 3.7 7.3 November 105 3.5 9.2 December 134 4.3 12.2 Total 1,398 3.8 100.0 Figure 34: Average ALS Calls per Day by Month Average ALS Calls per Day by Month 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 �ck A Edmonds, Washington Page 23 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 378 8.2.c Figure 35: Annual Total and Average per Day of ALS Requests by Day of Week Day of Week Sunday Number of Calls 194 Calls per Day 3.7 Call Percentage 13.9 Monday 196 3.8 14.0 Tuesday 199 3.8 14.2 Wednesday 214 4.1 15.3 Thursday 183 3.5 13.1 Friday 212 4.1 15.2 Saturday 200 3.8 14.3 Total 1,398 3.8 100.0 Figure 36: Average ALS Calls per Day by Day of Week Average ALS Calls per Day by Day of Week 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Requests for ALS service were analyzed by the hour of the day and the average hourly rate of requests. The annual frequency of ALS calls by the hour of day follows a similar pattern as the BLS demand curve previously presented with the busiest period between 0800 and 2200. The average hourly call rate did not exceed 0.27 calls per hour at the peak. Requests by hour of the day are represented in the figures below. Edmonds, Washington Page 24 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 379 8.2.c Figure 37: Annual Total and Average per Day of ALS Requests by Hour of Day Hour of Day 0 Number of Calls 28 Calls per Hour 0.08 Call Percentage 2.0 1 31 0.08 2.2 2 25 0.07 1.8 3 27 0.07 1.9 4 23 0.06 1.6 5 35 0.10 2.5 6 39 0.11 2.8 7 60 0.16 4.3 8 74 0.20 5.3 9 71 0.19 5.1 10 70 0.19 5.0 11 97 0.27 6.9 12 83 0.23 5.9 13 76 0.21 5.4 14 70 0.19 5.0 15 85 0.23 6.1 16 66 0.18 4.7 17 70 0.19 5.0 18 92 0.25 6.6 19 72 0.20 5.2 20 55 0.15 3.9 21 64 0.18 4.6 22 47 0.13 3.4 23 38 0.10 2.7 Total 1,398 3.83 100.0 Edmonds, Washington Page 25 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 T N I - Packet Pg. 380 8.2.c Figure 38: Average ALS Calls per Day by Hour of Day Average ALS Calls per Day by Hour 0.30 0.25 — 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 FD1 contributes a significant amount of resources responding to ALS requests within Edmonds. FD1 sends multiple units to 95 percent of the ALS requests. On average, 2.3 units were dispatched per ALS call. The agency made a total of 3,173 responses to ALS calls. The total time on task was 1,742 hours, and the average time on task was 33 minutes. M17 is the most dispatched unit, followed by A16, A17 and M20. Edmonds, Washington Page 26 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 381 8.2.c Figure 39: Workload by Unit for ALS Calls Station Description Unit ..per Engine E10 Avg Busy Minutes Run 26.4 Total Busy Hours 7.1 Number of Runs 16 10 Medic M10 39.1 16.9 26 Station 10 Total 34.3 24.0 42 11 Battalion B11 19.5 1.3 4 Aid unit A16 31.7 262.9 497 Battalion B16 18.3 25.0 82 16 Engine E16 15.3 7.2 28 Medical Services Officer MS016 23.9 6.0 15 Station 16 Total 29.0 301.1 622 Aid unit A17 34.0 247.0 436 Engine E17 22.8 9.1 24 17 Medic M17 38.3 797.7 1,250 Station 17 Total 37.0 1,053.8 1,710 18 Medic M18 20.5 2.4 7 Engine E19 14.5 9.2 38 19 Medic M19 20.4 41.2 121 Station 19 Total 19.0 50.4 159 Aid unit A20 30.1 61.2 122 Ladder(quint) L20 21.3 13.1 37 20 Medic M20 33.0 183.4 333 Station 20 Total 31.4 257.7 492 Medic M21 21.7 1.1 3 Medical Services Officer MS021 22.7 49.7 131 21 Technical Rescue TR21 4.6 0.1 1 Station 21 Total 22.6 50.8 135 23 Ladder(quint) L23 31.0 0.5 1 NA Medical Services Officer MSO11 6.2 0.1 1 Fire District 1 Total 32.9 1,742.1 3,173 BLS/ALS Transport We analyzed outcomes for the requests for BLS and ALS services. The number of EMS transports totaled 2,359, averaging 6.5 transports per day. Approximately 50% of the BLS calls and 78% of ALS calls have patients being transported to the hospital by Edmonds. However, nearly half of the requests for BLS did not result in a transport to the hospital, an indication that the sickness/illness is of lower acuity. Duration of a call is defined as the difference between the first unit dispatch time and the last unit clear time. On average, the duration of a BLS transport call was 45 minutes, which is 2.2 times of a non - transport BLS call (20 minutes). On average, the duration of an ALS transport call was 54 minutes, which is 1.7 times of a non -transport ALS call (32 minutes). Edmonds, Washington Page 27 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 382 8.2.c Figure 40: EMS Transports by Call Category We combined BLS and ALS service requests, and analyzed their variation by the hour of the day and the average hourly rate of requests. The variation of total EMS requests and EMS transport reports follow a similar pattern. The busiest period for EMS and EMS transport requests was between 0800 and 2000. The average hourly call rate did not exceed 0.66 calls per hour at the peak, 1100. EMS transport demand peaked at 0.41 calls per hour at 1100. Requests by hour of the day are represented in the figures below. Figure 41: Average BLS/ALS Calls and BLS/ALS Transports per Day by Hour of Day �BLSJALSTransports per Day -BLSJALS Calls per Day 0.8 0.7 o.6 0.5 ru L v Q 0.4 ru u as 0.3 ru L 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour of Day Edmonds, Washington Page 28 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 383 8.2.c Figure 42: Total BLSIALS Calls and BLS/ALS Transports and Average per Day by Hour of Day 0 of BLS/ALS Transports 52 Number of BLS/ALS Calls 89 TransportsNumber BLS/ALS per Hour 0.14 per Hour 0.24 TransportHour 58.4 1 56 85 0.15 0.23 65.9 2 47 80 0.13 0.22 58.8 3 41 70 0.11 0.19 58.6 4 43 71 0.12 0.19 60.6 5 51 79 0.14 0.22 64.6 6 67 113 0.18 0.31 59.3 7 91 147 0.25 0.40 61.9 8 102 172 0.28 0.47 59.3 9 139 213 0.38 0.58 65.3 10 123 198 0.34 0.54 62.1 11 148 242 0.41 0.66 61.2 12 127 223 0.35 0.61 57.0 13 140 236 0.38 0.65 59.3 14 135 227 0.37 0.62 59.5 15 143 221 0.39 0.61 64.7 16 122 217 0.33 0.59 56.2 17 110 202 0.30 0.55 54.5 18 133 227 0.36 0.62 58.6 19 127 190 0.35 0.52 66.8 20 109 193 0.30 0.53 56.5 21 105 182 0.29 0.50 57.7 22 79 143 0.22 0.39 55.2 23 69 125 0.19 0.34 55.2 Review of System Performance The first step in determining the current state of FD1's deployment model is to establish baseline measures of performance. This analysis is crucial to the ability to discuss alternatives to the status quo and in identifying opportunities for improvement. This portion of the analysis will focus efforts on elements of response time and the cascade of events that lead to timely response with the appropriate apparatus and personnel to mitigate the event. Response time goals should be looked at in terms of total reflex time, or total response time, which includes the dispatch or call processing time, turnout time, and travel time, respectively. Edmonds, Washington Page 29 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 384 8.2.c Cascade of Events The cascade of events is the sum of the individual elements of time beginning with a state of normalcy and continuing until normalcy is once again returned through the mitigation of the event. The elements of time that are important to the ultimate outcome of a structure fire or critical medical emergency begin with the initiation of the event. For example, the first on -set of chest pain begins the biological and scientific time clock for heart damage irrespective of when 911 is notified. Similarly, a fire may begin and burn undetected for a period of time before the fire department is notified. The emergency response system does not have control over the time interval for recognition or the choice to request assistance. Therefore, the Fire District 1 utilizes quantifiable "hard" data points to measure and manage system performance. These elements include alarm processing (with updated CAD), turnout time, travel time, and the time spent on -scene. Detection Is the element of time between the time an event occurs and someone detects it and the emergency response system has been notified. This is typically accomplished by calling the 911 Primary Safety Answering Point (PSAP). Call Processing This is the element of time measured between when SNOCOM 911 answers the 911 calls, processes the information, and subsequently dispatches the units. Turnout Time This is the element of time that is measured between the time the fire department is dispatched or alerted of the emergency incident and the time when the fire apparatus or ambulance is enroute to the call. Travel Time The travel time is the element of time between when the unit went enroute, or began to travel to the incident, and their arrival on -scene. Total Response Time The total response time, or total reflex time, is the total time required to arrive on -scene beginning with SNOCOM 911 answering the phone request for service and the time that the units arrive on -scene. Edmonds, Washington Page 30 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 385 8.2.c Comparison of Workloads by Demand Zone Another method of assessing the effectiveness of the distribution model is to analyze the demand for services across the distribution model. Workload is assessed at the station demand zone level and at the individual unit level. Analyses illustrate that the three stations in Edmonds, 16, 17 and 20, are planned to respond to 97 percent of the emergency requests. The other three percent of the requests are planned to be responded to by the closest station depending on the geographic grids. Station 16 accounted for 28.8 percent of the Edmonds workload, station 17 accounted for 33.3 percent of the workload, and station 20 accounted for 35.1 percent of the workload. Results are presented below. Figure 43: FD1 Unit Workload by Station Demand Zone Department Workload by Station Demand Zone 3,000 45 40 2,500 35 2,000 30 L ° 25 0. v v 1,500 20 a 1,000 15 10 500 5 0 IM 0 Station 16 Station 17 Station 20 Other Number of Responses Percent of Department Workload Edmonds, Washington Page 31 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 386 8.2.c Figure 44: Department Workload by Station Demand Zone for Edmonds Incidents First Due Station Number of Calls Calls per Day Call Percentage Number of Responses Responses per Day Percent of Department Workload Note: (1) A request might have been responded to by multiple units that is why the number of responses is more than the number of calls. (2) This data reflects calls run into Edmonds. For example, Stations 10, 14, and 19 will have considerable workload in their own districts that is not presented here. Further analyses were completed identifying both the distribution of department workload by call type and within station proportion of workload by call types. The overall distribution of department workload supports earlier findings that greater than 86% of the requests for service are EMS related. Approximately 10 % of the unit responses were associated with fire related incidents. The remaining 3.9% of the requests for service were associated with Special Operations and Service related responses. The Department's overall distribution of workload by call type and station demand zone is presented below. Station 20 is planned to respond to most BLS requests, and the three Edmonds stations have similar planned workload for ALS requests. Figure 45: Distribution of Department Workload by Call Type Distribution of Department Workload by Type 20 18 16 14 �12 10 a 8 6 4 2 Station16 Station17 Station20 Other Station Demand Zone ■ EMS ■ EMS-ALS Fire ■ Service Special Ops Edmonds, Washington Page 32 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 387 8.2.c The within station analyses did not reveal any significant deviations from the department's overall experience. Findings are presented below. In addition, the total number of unit responses conducted in each station demand zone is presented below. Figure 46: Within Station Proportion of Workload by Call Type Within Station Proportion of Workload by Call Type so 70 60 50 R m 40 c� 30 20 10 0 Station16 Station17 Station20 Other Station Demand Zone ■ EMS ■ EMS-ALS Fire ■ Service Special Ops Figure 47. Number of Responses by Station Demand Zone and Call Type for Edmonds Incidents First Due Station Station16 EMS 803 EMS-ALS 1,067 Fire 189 Service 64 Special Ops 0 Total 2,123 Station17 1,033 1,038 254 88 42 2,455 Station20 1,241 992 274 77 5 2,589 Stationl0 62 35 6 3 0 106 Station14 18 25 5 3 0 51 Station19 24 16 5 1 0 46 Missing 0 0 0 2 0 2 Total 3,181 3,173 733 238 47 7,372 Finally, unit workload analyses were completed for both comparative purposes as well as for introspection into potential system failures. First, this analysis utilized the summation of individual unit workload from dispatch to clear. Of fire suppression units (engine and ladder), Ladder L20 was dispatched the most, a total of 367 runs in 2014, which accounted for almost 31% of the total fire suppression unit runs and averaged one run per day. The second and third most utilized fire suppression apparatus was Ladder E17 and E16. E17 made 334 run and E16 made 304 runs. Of the BLS and ALS units, M17 was utilized the most, which made 1,402 runs and accounted for 25% of BLS and ALS runs. M17 averaged 3.8 runs per day. A17, A16 and M20 each made 1,257, 1191 and 999 runs respectively in 2014. Edmonds, Washington Page 33 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 388 8.2.c A17, A16 and M20 averaged 3.4, 3.3 and 2.7 runs per day respectively in 2014. A total of 7,372 apparatus responses were included in this analysis and distributed across the various FD1 stations. This analysis is focused on the major staffed response resources, which have responded to Edmonds calls. Results of the unit workload analysis are presented below. Figure 48: 2014 Unit Workload Analyses by Unit and Call Category for Edmonds Incidents Station Unit AIR10 DescriptionSpecial Air light unit 0 0 5 0 0 Total 5 Responses perday 0.0 10 E10 Engine 30 16 6 2 0 54 0.1 M10 Medic 34 26 1 0 0 61 0.2 11 B11 Battalion 8 4 23 0 4 39 0.1 12 DCON12 Decon unit 1 0 3 0 1 5 0.0 13 E13 Engine 1 0 4 0 0 5 0.0 A16 Aid unit 682 497 2 7 3 1,191 3.3 B16 Battalion 166 82 45 13 8 314 0.9 16 E16 Engine 76 28 142 56 2 304 0.8 MAR6 Marine boat 1 0 0 4 3 8 0.0 MS016 Medical Services Officer 3 15 3 0 1 22 0.1 A17 Aid unit 804 436 10 7 0 1,257 3.4 17 E17 Engine 60 24 170 74 6 334 0.9 M17 Medic 118 1,250 28 2 4 1,402 3.8 E18 Engine 1 0 4 0 0 5 0.0 18 M18 Medic 4 7 3 0 1 15 0.0 E19 Engine 26 38 23 4 0 91 0.2 19 M19 Medic 122 121 9 0 0 252 0.7 A20 Aid unit 258 122 3 4 0 387 1.1 E20 Engine 2 0 1 0 0 3 0.0 20 L20 Ladder(quint) 87 37 177 63 3 367 1.0 M20 Medic 659 333 3 2 2 999 2.7 A21 Aid unit 5 0 0 0 0 5 0.0 B21 Battalion 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.0 21 M21 Medic 5 3 0 0 0 8 0.0 MS021 Medical Services Officer 22 131 25 0 4 182 0.5 TR21 Technical Rescue 0 1 22 0 5 28 0.1 E22 Engine 0 0 17 0 0 17 0.0 22 M22 Medic 2 0 1 0 0 3 0.0 23 L23 Ladder(quint) 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.0 BK17 Bike 4 0 0 0 0 4 0.0 NA MS011 Medical Services Officer 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.0 Edmonds, Washington Page 34 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 T N r Packet Pg. 389 8.2.c Figure 49: 2014 Number of Dispatches by Unit to Edmonds Incidents 2014 Unit Workload Analysis 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1° ) � v w � w � ��,a Note: units which had less than 50 responses in 2014 are not included in this Figure. Another measure, time on task, is necessary to evaluate best practices in efficient system delivery and consider the impact workload has on personnel. Unit Hour Utilization (UHU) determinants were developed by mathematical model. This model includes both the proportion of calls handled in each major service area (Fire, EMS, ALS, Special-Ops, and Service) and total unit time on task for these service categories in 2014. The resulting UHU's represent the percentage of the work period (24 hours) that is utilized responding to requests for service. The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) recommends that 24-hour units do not surpass a 0.30, or 30% workload threshold. In other words, best practice would not have units and personnel exceeding 30%, of their workday responding to calls. This would equate to approximately 8 hours of the 24-hour period. These thresholds take into consideration the necessity to accomplish non -emergency activities such as training, health and wellness, public education, and fire inspections. For the three stations (16, 17 and 20) in Edmonds, each shift has 12 firefighters to constantly staff 4 units. In Station 16, each shift has 4 firefighters and two units are constantly staffed. E16 and A16 are cross staffed and a battalion chief unit is staffed. In station 17, each shift has 5 firefighters and two units are constantly staffed. M17 is constantly staffed, and E17 and A17 are cross staffed. In station 20, each shift has 3 firefighters and A20, E20, M20 and L20 are cross staffed. Except the battalion chief unit, four constantly staffed units combined were deployed 3,215 hours, and had a utilization rate of 9.2% in 2014. The most utilized unit is the ALS unit M17 at approximately 10.0%, followed by cross staffed units in Edmonds, Washington Page 35 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 390 8.2.c station 20 at 9.7% and cross -staffed A16/E16 at 9.2%. At the current workload utilization rates, the three stations should have a limited impact on their level of readiness or system performance. Figure SO: Fire District 1's Staffing Model Station 10 Number of`7 Firefighters 5 (0800-2000) Staffed Unit E10 Resources M10 NumberDay of Firefighters 3 Night (2000-0800) Staffed Unit E10/M10 Resources 11 6 E11 M11 B11 6 E11 M11 B11 12 3 E12/DCON12/M12 3 E12/DCON12/M12 13 3 E13/M13 3 E13/M13 16 4 E16/A16 B16 4 E16/A16 B16 17 5 E17/A17 M17 5 E17/A17 M17 18 3 E18/M18 3 E18/M18 19 3 E19/M19 3 E19/M19 20 3 L20/M20/A20 3 L20/M20/A20 21 6 E21/TR21 M21/A21 MS021 4 E21/TR21 MS021 22 3 E22/M22 3 E22/M22 23 3 L23 3 L23 Figure 51: Unit Hour Utilizations Unit Hour Utilization by Unit 4.35 �UHU tIAFF 0.30 0.25 m m 0 0.20 y N 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 M17 A20/M20/L20/E20 A17/E17 A16/E16 B16 Note: This analysis only includes units from stations 16, 17 and 20. Edmonds, Washington Page 36 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 391 8.2.c Description of First Arriving Unit Performance Analyses of the response characteristics of the first arriving units were conducted. This analysis utilized all emergency unit responses in 2014. Overall the department had a mean turnout time of 102 seconds, or 1 minute and 42 seconds, and 153 seconds, or 2 minutes and 33 seconds at the 901h percentile. The travel time for all first arriving unit responses were calculated irrespective of their assigned station FDZ. In other words, this analysis describes the first arriving unit to the scene. The mean travel time was 216 seconds, or 3 minutes and 36 seconds. Performance at the 901h percentile was 343 seconds, or 5 minutes and 43 seconds. As previously discussed the dispatch interval is not discussed in the major body of the report. Therefore, the "total response time" is defined as the sum of turnout and travel times. The mean turnout plus travel time is 318 seconds, or 5 minutes and 18 seconds. Performance at the 90th percentile is 449 seconds, or 7 minutes and 29 seconds. Results of first arriving unit performance are presented below Figure 52: Description of First Arriving Unit Emergency Response Performance Measure Average Turnout Time 1.7 90th Percentile 2.6 Travel Time 3.6 5.7 Turnout and Travel Time 5.3 7.5 First Arriving Unit Response Time by Station Demand Zone Further analyses were conducted to measure the performance of the first arriving unit in each station This analysis included all unit responses to capture only emergency responses within each FDZ at the first arriving unit. Response times are reported below at both the mean and 901h percentile. Examination of the overall performance at the 90th percentile reveals that Stations 17 have the quickest response times followed by Stations 16 and 20 in order of performance. The FDZ with the longest travel and total response times are stations 10 and 14. An illustrative comparison of FDZ performance at the 90th percentile is provided below. Figure 53: Mean First Arrival Performance by First Due Station First Due Station Station 16 Turnout Time 1.7 Travel Time 3.7 Turnout and Travel 5.4 Sample Size 1,235 Station 17 1.7 3.1 4.7 1,425 Station 20 1.7 3.8 5.5 1,485 Station 10 1.7 6.6 8.4 66 Station 14 1.8 6.6 8.3 32 Station 19 1.8 4.2 6.0 34 Edmonds, Washington Page 37 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 392 8.2.c Figure 54: 90th Percentile First Arrival Performance by Station FDZ First Due Station Station 16 Turnout Time 2.5 Travel Time 5.5 Turnout and Travel 7.4 Sample Size 1,235 Station 17 2.6 4.9 6.8 1,425 Station 20 2.6 5.9 7.6 1,485 Station 10 2.7 9.3 11.2 66 Station 14 2.5 9.7 11.6 32 Station 19 2.6 6.6 8.5 34 Figure 55: 90th Percentile First Arrival Performance by Station FDZ The data was further analyzed to compare the individual station FDZ performances. With respect to turnout time, each of the stations is experiencing similar average turnout times. Conversely, when examining the travel time performance, performances for calls in stations 10, 14 and 19 are significantly longer than calls in other first due stations. But those calls only accounted for 3 percent of the total. Similarly, since travel time is the single largest indicator of overall response performance, the turnout plus travel time analysis revealed that 90th percentile measurements for calls in first due stations 10, 14 and 19 are significantly longer than calls in the other stations. But overall, for calls in stations 16, 17 and 20, the average and 90th percentile turnout and travel time are within 8 minutes. Edmonds, Washington Page 38 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 393 8.2.c Figure 56: 90th Percentile Turnout Time by Station FDZ ■ Turnout Time 3•0 2.5 2.0 ..................... V cc 1.5 TA............. ............. .............. ............. 0.5 . . 0.0 Station16 Station 17 Station zo Station 1a Station 1; station 19 Fiaure 57: 90th Percentile Travel Time Performance by Station FDZ Figure 58: 90th Percentile Turnout and Travel Performance by Station FDZ ■ Turnout and Travel 12 11 10 9 8 +I 7 6 i 5 4 3 2 1 0 Station 16 Station 17 Station 20 Station 10 Station 14 Station 19 Edmonds, Washington Page 39 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 394 8.2.c Effective Response Force Capabilities The capability of an Effective Response Force (ERF) to assemble in a timely manner with the appropriate personnel, apparatus, and equipment is important to the success of a significant structural fire event. Therefore, it is important to measure the capabilities of assembling an ERF. In most fire departments, the distribution model performs satisfactorily, but it is not uncommon to be challenged to assemble an ERF in the recommended timeframes. Several factors affect the capabilities to assemble an ERF such as the number of fire stations, number of units, and number of personnel on each unit. Each of these policy decisions should be made in relation to community's specific risks and the willingness to assume risk. Analyses of historical performance for each station reveal that stations 16, 17 and 20 can generally assemble five units on scene within an average travel time of eight minutes. However, the 901n percentile performance is outside of best practice of either eight (8) minutes for NFPA 1710 or 10 minutes and 24 seconds for the CFAI. The graphic results for each fire station demand zone are presented in the figures below. Figure 59: ERF Travel Performance for Station 16 Station 16 - ERF Travel 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 m 6.0 O c_ 5.0 4 Q 4.0 O Q 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Order of Arrival Edmonds, Washington Page 40 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 395 8.2.c Figure 60: ERF Travel Performance for Station 17 Station 17 - ERF Travel 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 4 P 6.0 4 4.0 I:> 4 2.0 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Order of Arrival -figure 61: ERF Travel Performance for Station 20 Station 20 - ERF Travel 14.0 12.0 10.0 4 8.0 7 C g 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Order of Arrival -figure 62: 901h Percentile ERF Travel Performance for Station 16 Station 16 - ERF Travel 16 14 12 10 Y p 8 6 O 4 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Order of Arrival Edmonds, Washington Page 41 Fire Services Efficiency Assessment a © Fitch & Associates, LLC April 2016 Packet Pg. 396 8.2.c Figure 63: 901h Percentile ERF Travel Performance for Station 17 Station 17 - ERF Travel 16 14 12 y 10 c 8 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Order of Arrival Figure 64: 901h Percentile ERF Travel Performance for Station 20 Station 20 - ERF Travel 16 14 12 10 Q r ` 8 4 4 6 Q 4 - 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 Order of Arrival In addition, the data is presented in tabular form below. The figure presents the historical travel times by the order of the arriving unit. Please note the sample sizes vary by order of arrival. Figure 65: Historical Mean and 90th Percentile Travel Time Performance for ERF by Station FDZ Order of Arrival Average Station 16 Station 17 Station 20 Station 90th 16 Percentile Station 17 Station 20 a Edmonds, Washington Page 42 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 397 8.2.c Reliability Factors Percentage of Department Compliance The first step in assessing the reliability of the deployment model or system performance is to understand the department's availability to handle the requests for service that occur within the city limits or jurisdiction. Fire District 1 is available to respond to 98.1% of the requests for service that are originating within Edmonds. A total of 90 incidents were responded to by other agencies with no Fire District 1 units responding. Percentage of First Due Compliance The reliability of the distribution model is a factor of how often the response model is available and able to respond to the call within the assigned demand zone. If at least one unit from the first due station is able to respond to a call, we consider the station is able to response to the call within the assigned demand zone. Utilizing the department's Fire Station Demand Zones (FDZ), analyses reveal that station 17 is capable of meeting their demand for services at the 90th percentile. In other words, when request for service is received FDZ 17 units are available to answer the call 9 out of 10 times. Station 16 and 20 each are reliable at 81 and 85 percent of the time. It is considered both best practice and the most reliable measure to perform at the 901h percentile as indicated by the "blue" line in the figure below. This analysis utilized all dispatched calls within Edmonds and the performance included all assigned units to the specific FDZ. In Station 16, each shift has 4 firefighters and E16 and A16 are cross staffed. In station 17, each shift has 5 firefighters and two units are constantly staffed, M17 and E17 or A17 (cross staffed). In station 20, each shift has 3 firefighters and A20, E20, M20 and L20 are cross staffed. Figure 66: Percentage Reliability by Station FDZ Station Demand Zone Reliability 90 P 80 e 70 r 60 c 50 e 40 n 30 t 20 a 10 9 0 e Station 16 Station 17 Station 20 Station Demand Zone Edmonds, Washington Page 43 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 398 8.2.c Figure 67. Percentage Reliability by Station FDZ Note: This analysis only includes Edmonds stations 16, 17 and 20. Call Concurrency Call concurrency is defined as the rate at which another call was received for the same fire station demand zone while one of the station's apparatus was already on a call. In other words, if Engine 16 is on a call and another request for service is generated in Station 16's fire demand zone, then the second incident would be captured as a concurrent call. This is different from the reliability of the system, because call concurrency is restrictive to calls not served by the primary unit because they were already on a call. Alternatively, the system reliability presented in the previous section includes all calls not served by the primary station regardless of the cause. An example would be that Engine 16 was out of service for training for a portion of their 24-hour shift and didn't handle responses in their territory. Therefore, the combination of examining the system reliability and call concurrency provides a comprehensive understanding of the system's performance. This analysis validated that the systems performance for requests for service as each of the fire station demand zones had less than 20% call concurrency for all unique incidents in 2014. Station 17 has concurrency percent nearly 18%, and station 16 has the lowest concurrency at 8%. Results are presented below. Figure 68: Call Concurrency for 2014 by First Due Station First Due Station Concurrent Calls Total Calls Percent Concurrency Edmonds, Washington Page 44 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 N ti Packet Pg. 399 8.2.c Figure 69: Call Concurrency for 2014 by Station FDZ Probability of Concurrent Calls 2a 18 17.8 16 14 12 10 9.3 8 7.9 6 4 2 0 Station 16 Station 17 Station 20 Baseline Performance Tables The data available during the development of this Standards of Coverage document only discuss pick-up to dispatch performance in the following four tables. The current CAD software does not capture the event in a unique record for all requests. The figures below represent the baseline performance for EMS and fire incidents. Since there are only 8 special operations calls, and all service calls were responded without lights and sirens, thus we did not include them. Please note that not all EMS incidents had two units responding, and not all fire incidents had 4 units responding, and that is why the sample size to calculate average time for ERF is smaller than the first arriving on scene unit. For EMS calls, in the past three years, the average dispatch time was 46 seconds or 0.8 minutes. The average turnout and travel time was 318 seconds (5 minutes and 18 seconds). The average time of the ERF unit or second arriving unit was 379 seconds (6 minutes and 19 seconds), which is one minute longer than the first arriving unit. For fire suppression calls, in the past three years, the average dispatch time was 1.0 minute. The average turnout and travel time of the first arriving unit was 372 seconds (6 minutes and 12 seconds). The average time of the ERF unit or fourth arriving unit was 462 seconds (7 minutes and 42 seconds), which is 90 seconds longer than the first arriving unit. Edmonds, Washington Page 45 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 400 8.2.c figure iu: esaseune verlormanceTor rm.5 lesw/Hu/ ►nciaenrs-zulz/zu14 Average Time 2014 Alarm Handling Pick-up to Dispatch 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 Turnout Time Turnout Time - 1st Unit 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.9 Travel Time -1st Unit 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 Travel Time Travel Time - ERF (2nd Arriving Unit) 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.7 Turnout and Travel Time 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.5 Turnout and - 1st Unit Travel Time Turnout and Travel Time - ERF (2nd Arriving Unit) 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.5 Alarm Handling 9,712 3,238 3,241 3,233 Sample Size 1st Unit 11,549 3,847 3,886 3,816 ERF 5,058 1,670 1,717 1,671 Figure 71: Baseline Performance for Fire Incidents-201212014 Average Time 2014 Alarm Handling Pick-up to Dispatch 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 Turnout Time Turnout Time - 1st Unit 2.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 Travel Time -1st Unit 4.0 3.9 4.0 4.1 Travel Time Travel Time - ERF 5.1 4.8 4.8 5.6 (4th Arriving Unit) Turnout and Travel Time 6.2 6.0 6.2 6.4 Turnout and - 1st Unit Travel Time Turnout and Travel Time - ERF (4th Arriving Unit) 7.7 7.3 7.6 8.2 Alarm Handling 725 237 247 241 Sample Size 1st Unit 1,322 422 478 422 ERF 103 30 39 34 We also summarized 90th percentile performances for the 1st arriving and ERF units for EMS and fire incidents separately. For EMS calls, in the past three years, the 90 percentile dispatch time was 69 seconds (1 minute and 9 seconds). The 90th percentile turnout and travel time was 449 seconds (7 minutes and 29 seconds). The average time of the ERF unit or second arriving unit was 530 seconds (8 minutes and 50 seconds). For fire suppression calls, in the past three years, the 90th percentile dispatch time was 106 seconds (1 minute and 46 seconds). The 90th percentile turnout and travel time of the first arriving unit was 531 seconds (8 minutes and 51 seconds). The 90th percentile time of the ERF unit or fourth arriving unit was 608 seconds (10 minutes and 8 seconds). The department can reference the historical performances and make reasonable targets to continuously improve the response process to meet recommended targets by industry standards or best practices. Edmonds, Washington Page 46 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 401 8.2.c Figure 72: Summary of 90th Percentile Performance for EMS (BLS/ALS) Incidents - 201212014 90th Percentile Time 2014 Alarm Handling Pick-up to Dispatch 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 Turnout Time Turnout Time - 1st Unit 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.8 Travel Time -1st Unit 5.6 5.6 5.5 5.6 Travel Time Travel Time - ERF (2nd Arriving Unit) 6.8 6.9 6.7 7.0 Turnout and Travel Time Turnout and - 1st Unit 7.5 7.3 7.4 7.7 Turnout and Travel Time Travel Time - ERF (2nd Arriving Unit) 8.8 8.8 8.6 9.2 Alarm Handling 9,712 3,238 3,241 3,233 1st Unit 11,549 3,847 3,886 3,816 Sample Size ERF j 5,058 1,670 1,717 1,671 Figure 73: Summary of 90th Percentile Performance for Fire Incidents - 201212014 90th Percentile Time, Alarm Handling Pick-up to Dispatch 1.8 1.4 1.7 ---.!!12 2.2 Turnout Time Turnout Time - 1st Unit 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.2 Travel Time -1st Unit 6.6 6.6 6.8 6.6 Travel Time Travel Time - ERF (4th Arriving Unit) 7.7 7.5 7.2 8.9 Turnout and Turnout and Travel Time - 1st Unit 8.9 8.5 9.2 9.1 Travel Time Turnout and Travel Time - ERF (4th Arriving Unit) 10.1 10.0 10.1 11.2 247 Alarm Handling 725 237 241 478 Sample Size 1st Unit 1,322 422 422 39 ERF 103 30 34 Edmonds, Washington Page 47 © Fitch & Associates, LLC Fire Services Efficiency Assessment April 2016 Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Fitch_Data_Report (1721 : Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement) 8.2.d EXHIBIT A FIRE MARSHAL AND FIRE INSPECTOR 1. In consultation with the Clty, the District Fire Chief shall designate an Individual to serve as City Fire Marshal, and ensure the assignment of necessary personnel to support the needs and Functions of the Fire Marshal as specified in the International E Fire Code, City ordinances, and other fire service -related national, state, and local a standards adopted and/or Followed by the City.76 a an 2. As employees of the District, the City Fire Marshal nd Fire Ispector shall perform 0 all of the customary roles and dutles associated with their positions: fire prevention; ° fire investigation; code development, application, interpretation, and enforcement; °' permit processes; plans review; records retention, response to public records requests and other legal summons; fire and life safety public education; and other r duties as assigned in the City and throughout the jurisdictional areas served by the L District, n 3, The City agrees to pay 75 percent of the annual personnel cost (wages and benefits) of providing one (1) Fire Marshal, and 100 percent of the annual personnel cost (wages and benefits) of providing one (1 ) Fire Inspector, 4, The City Engine Company Inspection Program shall be maintained in its current form a� unless modified by mutual agreement of the parties, c 5. The City Fire Marshal is currently on active military duty and shall be restored to his L = current position as an employee of the District, upon his return to duty. Upon his 2 return to duty, the contract for payment mode[ will be modified, and all conditions 0 described in Section 5 City Employees will apply. a- 6. The City agrees to provide office-' space, office furnishings, computers, fax, N copier, printer, telephone landlines, and postal support for the use of the Fire Marshal and Fire Inspector in Edmonds City Hall. 41 7, All tees collected for Fire Permits/Special use, Fire Plan Checks, and Construction Inspections shall be retained by the City. November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 404 8.2.d EXHIBIT B USE OF FIRE STATIONS The City hereby grants to the District exclusive use and possession of premises for use as fire stations on the terms and conditions described below. c m E 1. Three Fire Stations. The City shall provide three fire stations located at 8429 - � 196`h Street Southwest, 275 - 6" Avenue North, and 23009 - 88th Avenue West in a the City of Edmonds, Washington. 76 V 2. Compliance with Applicable Codes. The fire stations provided by the City shall be compliant with all applicable codes, Including without limitation, the applicable provisions of the Edmonds City Code and applicable Washington State Standards and regulations (currently WAC 296-305-06501 et seq.). 3, No Use Char e. No use charge shall be assessed to the ❑istrict. The parties agree that the rights and contractual obligations contalned within the Agreement constitute adequate consideration for District use and possession of the premises. 4, Utilities and Services. The City shall ensure the supply of all utilities necessary for the use of the premises, to include: water, sewer, garbage, heating, air conditioning, electrical power, telephone and information technology/system data lines. Cost for Utilities. The District shall be responsible for the cost of all utilities used on the premises, except for those utilities supplied by the City. If a separate a meter Is unavallable for any utility which the District is responsible to pay, then the cost shall be equitably apportioned to the District In a manner agreeable to C14 both parties. 5. Conditions and Rgapairs. The City agrees to keep the premises and the buildings in good condition and repair as reasonably requested by the District for use as fire stations during the term of this Agreement at its own expense. The City shall at all times keep the buildings suitably equipped as fully functioning and operational fire stations. 6. Improvements. Upon District request, the City shall install such reasonable improvements as are normal and customary in connection with District use of premises set forth herein, The City shall pay for such Improvements, 7_ Removal of Personal Property Upon Termination of Agreement. Upon termination of this Agreement, the District shall remove all non -fixed equipment and personal property placed upon the premises by the District during the period of this Agreement. Any personal property not removed from the fire stations within 60 days after termination of this Agreement shall become the property of the City. 8. Maintenance of Premises. Maintenance of the buildings, the premises and all improvements thereon is the sole responsibility of the City. Such responsibility includes without limitation, repair of walls, floors, ceiling, interior doors, interior November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 405 8.2.d and exterior windows and fixtures, sidewalks, landscaping, driveways, parking areas, walkways, building exterior and signs. City shall maintain in good condition the structural parts of the fire stations and exterior buildings and structures which shall include emergency lighting, fences, enclosures, curbs, gutters and sidewalks, foundations, bearing and exterior walls, E subflooring and roof, roof -mounted structures, unexposed electrical, plumbing i and sewerage systems, including those portions of the systems lying outside the Q premises, exterior doors, apparatus bay doors, window frames, gutters, downspouts on the building and the heating, ventilating and air conditioning 76 c system Servicing the premises. c All janitorial services for routine cleaning of the buildings shall be the responsibility of the District. All grounds maintenance of the premises, to include fencing, enclosures, gates, landscape, stairs, rails, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drains, and water retention structures shall be the responsibility of the City, 9. Insurance and Financial Securit . The parties agree that the City shall not be responsible to the District for any property loss or damage done to the District's personal property occasioned by reason of any fire, storm or other casualty whatsoever beyond the control of the City. The District shall insure its personal property located on the premises, The District shall not be responsible to the City for any foss or damage to the buildings or premises which is not caused by the sake negligence of the District. a The City shall insure the premises and buildings against such loss or damage. The District shall repair any damage to the buildings caused by its sole negligence In the event of a casualty loss which renders the premises reasonably unsuitable for the use set forth herein, the City shall provide the District with another suitable location(s) for the District until such time as the premises have been repaired. The cost of repairs, and the costs of relocation between the premises and the substitute location(s), shall be borne by the City. 10. indemnification for Environmental Claims: Each party shall indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any and all claims, demands, judgments, orders, or damages resulting from the release of hazardous substances on the premises caused in whole or in part by the activity of the indemnifying party, its agents, employees, licensees or invitees. The term "hazardous substances" shall mean any substance heretofore of hereafter designated as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C.Sec. 6901 et_ seg.; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. Sec. 1257 et seg'; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.G. Sec. 2001 et seq.; the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 el.-Seg..; or the Hazardous Waste Cleanup -Model Toxic Control Act, RCW 70.105D all as amended and subject to all regulations promulgated thereunder. November 2, 2009 2 Packet Pg. 406 8.2.d 11. Indemnification and Hold Harmless: Each party agrees to protect, save, defend, hold harmless and indemnify the other party, its officers, employees and agents from any and all demands, claims, judgments, or liability for loss or damage arising as a result of accidents, injuries, or Other r occurrences on the premises, occasioned by either the negligent or willful conduct of the indemnifying party, regardless of who the injured party may be. E W L 12. Assignment of Agreement: If the District chooses to assign this Agreement to a an entity that assumes the obligations of the District under the Interlocal Y Y g � Agreement, the City may choose to modify or terminate the entire Interlocal c Agreement or applicable parts of the Agreement (Section 3 and/or Exhiblt B) under the terms described in Section 11 of the Agreement. Such action by the City shall not constitute a material breach of the Agreement. 13, Termination of Agreement. Upon termination of this Agreement or any extension thereof, whether by expiration of the stated term or sooner termination thereon as provided in the Interlocal Agreement, the District shall surrender to City the premises peaceably and quietly. 14. Def It and Remedies. Failure of the City to perform repairs or maintenance to the buildings or premises as described in 8. above within a reasonable period after notice by the District shall constitute a breach under the terms of this Agreement. For purposes of this Agreement, a reasonable period shall be construed to mean five (5) business days. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, if the nature of the repair constitutes an operational, safety, and/or security emergency which materially affects District a use of the premises or building for their intended purpose, the City shall perform the repair as soon as possible regardless of the day or hour and no later than forty-eight (48) hours after receiving notification from the District. If the City fails to timely perform the repair or maintenance under the conditions described above after notification, the District may have such repair or maintenance performed at City expense. The cost of the repair or maintenance shall be forwarded to the City, which shall pay the cost within thirty (30) days after notice. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the City shall not be in breach of any repair or maintenance obligation herein if the repair cannot be completed within the time set forth herein so long as the City is diligently pursuing completion of the repairs, November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 407 8.2.d Exhibit C Cost of Service Model Zoos Average Total Head Total Compensation Count Com ensation BC 577.191 4 44.298 CP 4,090,587 32 127,831 FP 6,106,357 53 115,214 FF 5,190,706 50 103,814 SHIFT LABOR SHIFT A SHIFT B SHIFT C SHIFT 0 TOTAL 13CJ 06060 6C6 0.6061 0.606 2.424 Station 5latlt24. 1, Factor On Duty 17 50 a02 CF FP FF 3.4371 l437 3,437 3,437 13,746 3A00 I 1000 3.40001 3.000 12.000 15-16-41 61641 & 1641 6,164 24.656 13,207 13.207 13 207 *3.2071 5DA02 SHIFT A SHIFT B SHIFT C SHIFT D TOTAL ec 87 4Q4 87,444 87,444 87,444 349,778 CP 439,291 439,291 439,291 439,291 1,757,1G3 Fr 345.843 345,643 345.643 345.643 1,382,572 FF 639-910 639.910 639.910 639.910 2,559,641 1.512,288 1,512,288 1.512,288 1,512,288 6049,153 2-Nov-09 2010 Contract Costs with 50.402 "total Personnel 20113 Total Labor Cost Increase 2010 Total Appa ra tus Costlncrease DIRECT STATION LABOR 6,178,604 13.08% 9.13% 77,79% Esperance Waodway Edmonds Total Station labor 8M.W 563,890 4.806,497 6,I78,&04 Overhead Ev+alplM$o Apparatus Base Cast Distribution FM -Edmonds t FW1-Woodway Total Personnel Inspector -Edmonds InsNuor-Woodway Total 90,822 56,389 480,649 617.960 90.822 56,389 480,649 617,S60 30,822 21,504 183,297 235,622 1,000,689 598,172 5,951,097 7,549,948 121,669 121,669 130, %6 130,566 1,000,689 698,172 6,203,322 7,902,183 Packet Pg. 408 8.2.d EXHIBIT D APPARATUS REPLACEMENT jEdmands P..K - Purchase tkk P6ce Y"r Cycle InnaGon ❑istrict Apparatus Replacement Schedule - oty Rolling Stock MID 1 291t 1 2012 1 ZM3 ) 2014 1 2015 1 2018 1 2017 1 2019 1 701.9 1 MM 1 21021 1 20M 1 2023 1 2.T24 I 2M 1 20M 1 2027 1 MN - ®�ssssssrss�ssssssssss �s■sss � is ss sass s ss s ss s s - - ®®��ss�sess�ssssss�ssss �®®�ssssssssss�ssssss� ®�ss��sss ss s � s� s � s«s a ■sae � ®�ss�ss s ss�s sss■s � a a � ®©� ass sss s ��sss isss■ss �ssss ®sass saes �ssssss s ®s sue. ss sass ssssssss ss ss ss ® sss�sssssssssss■■ss� � sss■■sississssssssssssss ��s ass se �ssss a ass ss � �� sss�isss�ss�ss�ssssss� - ® ss�sssss®sssss�ssss ®® ee�ese�e�s�e�e�see� ss ss ss ■s issssssss as ■s ssssss�sss s ss sssss a s sass � ��s ss s se s a sass ass as � ss�ss��ss s s se � s ass ■� s sass � s�s�s�ss ssssss sssss ss ss � � -����■��■■e�ese«ae�saa�sa�aass Total Edmonds Apparatus Replaeemnt Costs 2010-2028 5 s.sl7.ais :,Jas,G17 - aav'sc-: 1 M6N,20i 611.587 11.2-09 0104E 959,749 - - 3 ma3S1 Packet Pg. 409 8.2.d EXHIBIT E TRANSFER OF SICK AND VACATION LEAVE Accrued vacation hours for each City employee shall transfer hour for hour to the +, District effective on the Commencement Date of this Agreement. E 2. On the Commencement Date of the Agreement, the employees previously employed i by the City shall begin vacation use and accrual per the District collective tabor a agreement for union members, and per District policy for unrepresented employees. 3. Mhln 30 days after the Commencement Date of this Agreement, the City shall pay to the District at the employee's regular rate of pay ali unused vacation time hour for hour up to the date of transfer of employment. 4. Accrued sick time hours for each City employee shall transfer hour for hour to the District effective on the Commencement Date of the Agreement, 5. On the Commencement Date of the Agreement, employees previously employed by the City shall begin sick time use and accrual for the District collective labor agreement for union members, and per District policy for unrepresented employees. 6. Within 30 days after the Commencement Date of this Agreement, the City will pay to the District at the employees regular rate of pay the contractually owed rate of pay based on termination due to layoff caused by lack of work for union employees up to the date of transfer of employment, and per city policy the owed percentage of sick time accrued based on termination due to layoff caused by lack of work for unrepresented employees. The sick and vacation leave balances will be finalized on December 31, 2009, Until that time, City employees shall continue to accrue and use sick and vacation time, November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 410 8.2.d EXHIBIT F SENIORITY LISTS 1, The three seniority lists below are current as of the date indicated. 2. Effective January 1, 2010, maintenance of the three lists is the joint responsibility of Fire District #1 Human Resources Department and IAFF Union Local 1997, Insert here, BLENDED SENIORITY LIST, effective January 1, 2010, TABLE F1. NON -BLENDED SENIORITY LIST - IAFF UNION LOCAL 1997, effective December 31, 2009, TABLE F2. November 2, 2009 N Packet Pg. 411 8.2.d TABLE F3 UNBLENDED EDMONDS FIRE DEPARTMENT IAFF 1997 SENIORITY LIST- 12-31-09 Emp. No. Last Name First Name BIrthday Fire Hire Dale Ori lnal Hire' Sex A ency Data _Rank 1 0117 __ OFTEDAHL DENNIS J. 01/21/52 09/16/79 M 2 0128 HEPLER PATRICK M. 09/08/55 09116/79 M 3 0729 ALLISON STEVE P. 03/05/56 02/01/80 pry 4 C032 FiSCHER MICHAEL C 12/14/57 03/01/83 M 5 0320 MILLS RANDAL D. 12/08/61 05/01/64 M 6 0610 MARTIN JAMES W. 07/16/60 10/15/86 M 7 0519 WOODS JOEL E. 11/10/64 01/06/87 M 8 0868 1 STORM JOHN H. 03/04/59 03/16/68 M 9 1530 YOAKUM DAHL BOYLE ANDRE M. 10/12/65 01101/96 District I 11111/88 M 40 0991 DOUGLAS C. 10/10167 08101189 M 11 1035 WILLIAM D. 09/02/65 05/14/90 M 12 1082 FLETT THOMAS.A. 06/15/57 09/16/90 M 13 1532 KRUGMIRE CAMPBELL DAVID L. 05108/63 01/01196 District 1 01/01191 M 14 1536 THOMAS J. 06/20/67 01101/96 District 1 01101/91 M 15 1536 STEINBACH JUSTIN C. 09/17/68 01/04/96 District 1 02/24/92 M 16 1112 WARREN DEAN G. 06/04/54 02119/91 M 17 1111 ERICKSON DAVID I. 11/21169 02/19/91 M 18 1128 SOUCY JOSEPH P 04/24/65 05/01/91 M 19 1303 KUHN BRETT W 09/26/68 11/02/92 M 20 1343 NICHOLS ROBERTA, 10/14/65 07/06/93 M 21 1539 WHITE DONALD J. 12/19/65 01/01/96 Ofstrict I G2101/94 M 22 1425 ANDERSON TODD M. 04/29/69 08/22/94 M 23 1354 NESS STEVEN A. 05131/66 03111)95 M 24 1624 SMITH MICHAEL J. 06/14/53 091i6195 COE 07/16/78 M 25 XXX Vacant 26 1541 HAAS DEVIN M. 07/31/69 01/01/86 �} 27 1602 MCALLISTER BRIAN N. 11/11/67 07116/96 M 28 1785 HUNTER DAVID C. 01/11/63 09/16/98 M 29 2205 SMITH CLAYTON A. 02)01/78 04101/02 M 30 2208 DOWLING JOHN J_ 05126/72 04/01/02 M 31 2206 STEVENS DAVID L. 05114163 04/01/02 M 32 2207 BEARD MELISSA J. 02109171 04)01102 F 33 2215 DICKINSON JASON C. 0512006 06J03102 M^ 34 2261 IFFERT PAUL W. 05117/54 01/01/03 Medic 7 01/02/79 M 35 1 2262 SARCHIN JEFFREY N. 10/21/52 01/01/03 Medic 7 01106/86 M 36 2266 HOOVER TIM M. 07/27/70 01101/03 Medic 7 02101/95 M 37 2271 FORD JAMES E. 02/06/78 03/19103 M 38 2313 SCHLEICHER BRIAN W 01120/75 09/08/03 M 39 2328 CHAO ROBERT DOUGLAS D. 05/22/73 03/01104 M 40 2376 BEARDSLEY 04/22/88 08/1(VO4 M 41 2481 HAMMERSMARK KRISTEN A. 03/20/76 05/01106 F 42 2532 BAILEY JAMES A. 07/13175 02/16107 M 43 2586 KARG JOHNSTON CHRISTRP_HER_A. LEiF E Y 4 04/14/78 08/16/07 M 44 2587 OV12179 0B116107 M 145 2624 CASTELLON MOISES O41131B3 05/01108 1 M C �L O O 2 2 7 a Q Packet Pg. 412 8.2.d 46 2625 GUIDRY CABOT J. 10108/71 05/01108 M 47 2680 1 STRAWN CORY W. 07131/76 02102/09 M 48 2686 MAYFIELD KYLE N. 11/16/85 05/01/09 M 49 2087 RCONSON AN ONIO H. 07/00167 05/01/09 M 50 2688 MAPLES BEAU J. 12128184 1 05/01/09 M If agency other than Edmonds Fire Department (CQE=City of Edmonds) r N to a.. C d E t V t4 Q O O N R C T L O 2 u M L C O U r C am E t v a Packet Pg. 413 8.2.d EXHIBIT G ROLLING STOCK 1. The District shall pay a one-time, lump sum purchase price for the City apparatus and vehicles list below. 2. The lump sum purchase price shall be the price of apparatus and vehicles determined by Fire Trucks Pius, Inc. on June 16, 2009; by Kelly Blue Book as of August 14, 2009; the acquisition cost of the 1938 Ford Fire Engine; plus the value of two 2009 Ford E-450s Aid Units manufactured by Braun. Value for the aid units includes costs to deliver, set-up and letter. TABLE G1 No. Item ROLLING STOCK Value Trucks 474 1998 DARLEY FIRE ENGINE $ 107,000 475 1998 DARLEY FIRE ENGINE 107,000 475 1999 QUINT LADDER TRUCK 324,000 477 2006 SPARTAN PUMPER 303,000 Aid Units 471 1992 INTERNATIONAL AID - 484 2001 AID UNIT 30,000 4$5 2001 BRAUN REMOUNT Alt) UNIT 153.000 486 2001 BRAUN REMOUNT AID CAR 25,000 487 1999 FORD MEDIC UNIT 153,000 491 2007 FORD F-450 491-FIR 100,000 Support 488 2005 CHEVROLET TAHOE 15,000 490 2007 FORD ESCAPE 12.000 489 2008 FORD F250 28,000 492 2007 CHEV SUBURBAN 40,000 483 2001 FORD GROWN VIC 5,665 473 DONATED FIRE TRUCK 10,000 506 2004 BUICK CENTURY 6,540 Tolal $ 1,419,206 N❑vember 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 414 8.2.d EXHIBIT H PUBLIC SAFETY BOAT, MARINE 16 1, The Public Safety Boat, acquired with a Department of Homeland Security grant as a r county -wide asset and known as Marine 16, remains the property of the City. E a) 2. The District will use Marine i6 for training and emergencies purposes under the L terms and conditions described below: Q 2A District pays for fuel used for training and emergency response by Fire Department o personnel. L a� c 2.2. District pays for damage and/or breakage caused by its employees, r 2.3 if the District wants a change, addition, or modification to the boat exclusively for Fire purposes or use, the District pays for the change. 2A If the District and the Police Department jointly seek a change, addition, or modification, costs for the change are split evenly or apportioned in an appropriate manner. 2.5 District is responsible for replacing moveable equipment, for example, hose, nozzles, boat hooks, etc. but not for fixed appliances, for example, the monitor. 2.15 City is responsible for annual, regular and routine maintenance. 2.7 City is responsible for motor replacement funcluig. November 2, 2009 N ti r Packet Pg. 415 8.2.d EXHIBIT I TABLE 11 EQUIPMENT ATTRACTIVE ASSETS ❑etail listing - pages 2 through 10 Depreciated Item Group__ Cost Depreciation Value SCBAs $ 222.557 $ 58,399 $ M4,158 Turnout Ensemble 55,500 55,500 - Multigas Detectors 4,400 2,640 1,760 Thermal Imaging Cameras 49,750 26,133 23,617 AED 1 L,P121 BSS 78,728 33,657 45,072 Cell Phones 3,915 1,305 2,610 800MHz Radios 89,460 78,278 11,182 TOTAL $ 504,310 $ 255,912 $ 248,399 TABLE 12 ON -BOARD EQUIPMENT Detail listing - pages 11 through 45 Value_ _Depreciation 50% Adjusted Value Engine 16 $ 37,428 $ 18,714 $ 18,714 Engine 17 37,428 18,714 18,714 Engine 20 37,428 18,714 18,714 Ladder 20 56,519 28,260 28,260 Medic 17 12,965 6,493 6,493 Aid 16 6,239 3,120 3,120 Aid 17 6,239 3,120 3,120 Aid 20 6,239 3,120 3,120 TOTAL $ 200,505 $ 100,253 $ 100,253 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 416 8.2.d TABLE 11 ATTRACTIVE ASSETS DETAIL EFD Oara Aga in uselul D0preulalad Item mDftl Urie19 Control if Acqutied Cost Years Lffe Popr6alation Volpe 9 S MSA CORN MMR W13A Pack FfOH"tX APY318375 1 Jan-06 3 2AO 4 t5 668 1.636 MSA CORN MMR SCOA Pock FlreHawk APY31631i8 2 Jem06 2'aw 4 is b68 1,836 MSA CORN MMR SCBA Pack F3reHawk APY318364 3 Jan-OB 2.504 4 15 666 1.836 MSA CORN MMR SCBA 1 ack FnHawk AAY31733DR A Jan -OP 2,%M 4 15 668 11536 MSA CORM MMR SCOA Pack FireHawh ANY301796k 5 Jan-08 2.494 4 t5 666 1,836 MSA CORN MMR SCBA Pack rireHawk APY31837OR 6 Jan4f8 2,504 4 iS 665 1,836 MSA CORN MMR SCBA rack PlreHav4c APY31W79 7 Join-05 2,504 a t5 056 1,a36 MSA CO;1N MMR SCBA rack Ptrellawk APY31a36S 8 Jarn.D6 2,504 4 15 668 1,836 MSA CORN MMR SCBA Pack FireHawk APY318371 9 JswD6 2.501 4 lb 668 1,630 MSA CORN MMR SCOA Pat* rim"swk APY308096ft 10 Jill 05 2,504 4 15 GQ8 I,a36 MSA CORN MMR SCBA Pack FireHawA ANY319443 11 Jan -Oa 2 SO4 4 15 fi68 1,436 MSA CaNN MMR SCBA Pack FlreHswk APY318383 12 .lan-06 2,504 4 15 06 11830 MSA CORN MMR 8C9A F'ack PlreHewk APY3183811 13 Jan-06 2,604 4 15 668 1,836 MSA CBfW MMR SCBA Pack f-rreHdwk APY310385 14 Jan O6 2,504 A 15 660 1.035 MSA CFRN MMR SCBA Pack FueHamI APY318396 15 J6n•06 k,504 4 i5 060 A,036 MSA CB" MMR SCIIA Pack rifWawk APY31a373 i6 Jan.06 2,604 A la fio 11636 MSA CORN MMR $VrOA Pao hfoliawk ANY310435 $7 Jen•06 2.W4 A 15 060 1.836 MSA CBRN MMR SL`F3A Park FireHawk APY309110 18 Jarl•06 2."'1 A 10 660 1,830 MSA CORN MMR SC43A Pack rlfeHnwk APY318379 19 Jan•06 2,804 4 15 064 1436 MSA CBRN MMR SCBA Pack riieklawk APY310369 20 Jan-00 2.506 4 15 068 1,830 MSA CORN MMR SCOA PAch rircliawk APY319424 21 Jan•06 24504 4 i5 660 1,6366 MSA CORN MM8 SCBA Pack ; ih ul fs4o APY310374 22 Jan.06 2,504 A 15 648 1,an MSA GnRN MMR SCf1A Pink FlreHawk APY310370 23 Jan•06 2,504 A 15 fi68 1,836 MSA CORN MMR SCBA Park FwaHawk APY318367 24 Jan•08 2,504 4 15 66r1 1,S36 KSA CBRN MMR SCBA ruck Mlrsliawh ANY30069314 a.5 Jan•06 2,504 A 15 008 1,839 MSA CORN MWSC13A Pack NreHowk APY310425 26 Jan•06 2,504 4 15 80 1,830 MSA CORN MMR SCBA Pack F1r'aHaw4, AIIYJI0381 21 ,fan-110 2,504 4 15 664 1,836 MSA C12IRN MMR SC13A Pack FweHawk APY316285 24 Jan-06 21504 4 15 an 1,830 MSA C(MN )AMR SCBA Pack FkaHawk APY310368 29 Jan-06 2,504 4 15 666 1,830 MSA CHnN MMR SCBA Park Firofiawk APY316387 30 Jan-05 2,504 4 10 65$ 1,838 MSA GCe7N MMR SCBA Pack fVahihwh APY318366 31 Jan�06 7,604 4 15 068 1,8J0 MSA CBRN MMR SCBA Park Fkc}tawrk APY318423 17 Jail-00 2,904 4 15 65S 1,8315 MSA CORN MMR SCBA Pack Frra{iawk APY310317 33 Jnm00 2,506 4 15 0118 1,030 MSA CBRN MMR SCBA Pack FiroHawh APY318377 34 Jan•05 Z604 d 15 66{I 1,636 MSA CORN MMR SCBA 1 Eck FireHewh APY31628N4 35 J80-05 2.504 4 15 6136 1,830 MSA CBRN MMR SCBA Pack FueNarO APY310318 34 Jan-06 ?.504 4 15 649 I,R'iG MSA %No SCOA Air Ladle k1.45 CM 03050 1 Jan.00 961 4 15 262 719 MSA49min 5C8A Air 110111e 14•45 am 03870 2 J91)•06 901 A 16 2¢2 119 MSA 45min SCHA Alr Ila11la i 1.45 pM 63006 3 Ja+r-06 981 4 16 252 716 MSA 45min SCAA Air 0otee H-45 ❑N403046 4 Jan 00 961 4 15 262 7% MSA A6rmn SCBA air BOW i1.49 0M63825 5 Jan-06 981 4 15 262 779 MSA 45n1in SCBA Mr 6o19e H•45 0M 63023 6 Jan-06 Sal 4 15 202 710 MSA 45min SODA Air 07106 0-AS 0M 63818 1 Ja11-00 981 4 15 702 719 November 2, 2009 2 Packet Pg. 417 8.2.d Ell 0a18 Ago- in U50ut Deprec aietl Item Model Serinl0 Central Acquired Cvs1 Yeses LIFE 000rvciatwn Value MSA 4591111 SCBA Air BolOe H•45 OM 03845 6 4an.06 981 4 15 262 713 MSA 45m1n SCBA Alt Emig 11•45 OM 63856 9 J80,05 981 4 15 262 'S5 MSA 45min SCBA Alf OWN H-45 0M U849 10 Jw06 961 4 15 20i 119 MSA 45Min SC13A Ali Bottle H-45 OM 03867 11 40-06 963 4 16 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air Ba1114 H-45 0M63872 sk Jan•06 961 A 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Au Bnllle H-45 OM 63841 13 Jan-06 981 4 15 262 719 MSA 45mmn SCBA Air Bnllle 111-45 OM 03917 14 jail-06 981 a 15 262 710 MSA 45min SCUA Air BotHe PI 45 OM 15WO3 15 Janes 961 A 15 262 719 MSA A5min SC13A Air OaMle H-45 OM 63661 16 Jan 06 901 d 15 262 719 MSA ASmin SCBA An Bo111e YI.45 OM 63824 17 Jan-06 gal 4 1ti 262 710 MSA AWin SCBA Air Will 11a H•45 OM 03802 16 Jan-06 98t 4 16 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air Bettis H 45 OM 0835 19 JaA.O6 981 4 15 262 719 MSA 40min SCBA Air Bottle H45 OM 63640 20 ims-U6 961 1 15 262 70 MM45m01 SCBA Air 6010ti H•45 OM 63842 21 Jan-06 981 4 $5 262 719 MBA ASmtrm SCBA Alf Willa H-45 0M 03637 22 Jan-05 gal r1 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air Scaa H 45 0M 63815 23 .tan-pG eat 4 1S 2U 719 MSA 45mn SCBA Air Bdlto H-45 OM $3847 24 Jan -DO 981 4 15 262 719 MSA d5rrmin SCBA Air Bottle HAS OM 63834 25 Jan-06 9a1 4 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air Boille H-45 OM 63654 26 Jan-06 "1 4 15 262 7111 MSA 45mmn8CBA Air Doi tlu H-A5 Wells" 27 Jar1.06 9ti1 a M 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air Mile H-45 DM 6�87J2 28 Jan-06 981 ■ 15 262 719 MSA 4Smin SCBA Air Baills 11-48 OM 03671 29 Jan•UG 981 A 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air 11oth 11-45 OM 63862 30 Jan-00 981 4 15 282 719 NSA 45m+11 SCBA Air Bnllle H-45 OM63BBI 31 Jen•98 981 4 tb 262 719 MSA 45nnn SCBA Air Boille H-45 UM 63517 37 Jan-a6 981 4 15 262 710 MSA 45min SCBA Air Boot 11.45 OM 6305.S 33 Jiln•06 961 4 15 262 Mt MSA 45mm SCBA Air Bonze H-0 0M 6;1959 34 Jan-06 901 4 15 2262 712 MSA 45nnn SCBA Air 1301110 11.45 OM63568 35 Jail 06 9$l 4 15 262 719 MSA A5mmn SCBA Air 8p1tl0 II-49 0M G3531 36 Jan-06 987 t 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air BONIe 1.1-45 UM S3807 37 4en-06 981 4 15 262 7t9 MSA 45mmn SCBA Air BumHe H-A5 OM 63630 is Jan 06 9131 4 15 282 719 MSA 45nan SCBA Aix 13o11to 11.45 UM 63021 39 Jun-06 981 A 15 262 719 MSA 45min 9MA Air Battle H-45 010130131615 40 Jan-OG 981 4 15 267 719 MSA 45mmn SC13A Air 130le 11.45 0M 6:1520 41 aft•oe 901 4 15 262 7IS MSA 45min SC13A Air 13ollme H-45 OM 63839 42 Jan•06 9131 4 16 282 719 MSA 45nun SCBA Air 6o lle 11.45 OM 63673 J3 !a0-06 051 4 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCOA Air Botilo H-45 UM63068 44 .lri 981 4 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air Battle 1445 OM 03043 45 Jnn•06 981 4 15 282 719 MSA 45mn1 SCBA Ali 13o111e 1-11-43 OM 63836 46 J011•06 981 4 16 267 719 M5A 46min SCl1A Air Bnllle 11.45 0M 63616 47 Jan•00 961 4 15 262 7113 MSA 45min SCBA Air Bnllle H 45 0M 63889 411 lan•06 981 4 15 262 719 MSA 4Bmum SCBA Air 130fiv #3.45 DM 03827 49 Jan-06 9Q7 4 15 262 719 MSA s6min SCBA Aix Doi Ile H-45 OM 63894 50 Jnn-06 941 4 15 262 779 MSA 46nii6 SCBA Air 13018e 14-45 0M 633a5 51 lnn•O6 981 4 15 262 719 !November 2, 2009 3 Packet Pg. 418 8.2.d E60 Bate, Apo iri Uaaful Ooproclaloo Item Modol Serial M Control N Aequirod Cast Vows Lif4 Bapr4040-11 Yawl? MSA 45m1n SC9A Afr 801n8 H-45 OM G3860 82 Jan-515 961 4 15 252 719 MSA 43min SCBA A4 Goale H45 0M 63004 53 Jan•08 981 4 16 262 710 MSA 45min SCBA Air Bo11le H-46 OM 63844 51 Jnn-06 981 4 15 262 "A MSA 45min SCOA Air 30111a H-40 0M 63801 55 Jan•06 081 .1 15 202 719 MSA 46min SCBA Ate Dome H-45 QM 038 20 50 Jan-00 981 4 15 262 719 MSA A6rrwn SCBA Ak dome H-45 OM 6300b 57 Jan•06 081 4 15 20; 719 MSA 45min SCDAAir Wile H-45 0M63809 56 lan06 AB1 4 15 262 710 MSA 45trrin SODA AV Bogle H-45 0M63933 59 Jan•06 961 A 15 262 719 MSA 915min SCBA Air Bolile H-45 OM 83809 60 JanLM 961 4 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Alf Dome H-45 OM 53826 61 Jam% 961 4 15 262 7151 MSA 45min SCBA Air 801119 H-45 OM 63810 62 Jan-06 901 4 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air Wile H-45 OM 63828 03 Jan-06 981 4 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Afr Sortie H-45 OM 638157 64 Jan•06 9611 a 15 262 719 MSA 450n SC13A Air Wile H•45 OM 631132 65 Jan•06 951 4 15 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA AV Sollle H-45 OM 6J$018 00 Jan 96 901 4 iS 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air Wile H-45 0M 53813 67 Jan•05 961 a 15 202 719 MSA 45min SCBA Alt Battle 11•45 OM 63953 0 Jan-06 961 4 15 262 7;9 MSA 45min SCBA Air Rome H-45 QM 63611 66 Jor46 961 a 15 282 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air 0011le H-45 014 B3863 70 Jan•00 961 4 i5 262 7%9 MSA 45min 50A An BolUo i•I.46 OM 03595 71 Jan•OB 901 n 16 262 719 MSA 45min SCBA Air Wile H 45 OM 63A22 77 Jan•06 981 1 19 262 719 MSA SCOA 3Aa8k wlAmii liltrauilu Ida 1 Jen•06 773 a i9 206 567 MSA SCBA Mssk wl Aim UIIralE ile nle 2 Jam08 773 4 15 206 567 MSA SCOA MBak wl Aam lAlraLlite We 3 Jan-06 773 4 15 206 687 MSA SC13A Mesh wl Amp Lnlrapille nla 4 Jan•178 773 4 15 200 567 MSA SCBA Mau wlAnip UWREliie Iva 5 Jim-" 778 a 15 206 567 MSA SCSA Mash wl Amp Uilra lfle Ala 6 Jan•06 773 4 I0 206 567 MSA SCBA Mask w! Ai rip Ullraullle 60 7 4an-06 773 4 15 205 667 MSA SODA Mask wl AI11p 11111AN110 Na 8 Jon•ao 773 4 15 200 667 MSA SCBA Mask wl Arisi Ullromile Ala 9 Jsm•06 773 4 15 208 507 MSA SC13A Mmli wl AN UIIraEliie Alat 10 Jan•015 773 4 15 200 567 MSA SCl3A Mask wl Amp I1n(01ile No it Jam06 773 d '15 206 657 MSA SCBA Mask wl Amp UllfaUila nln 12 J011.96 773 4 15 206 S07 MSA SCBA Mask wl Amp Uilrallita clip 13 Jan-06 773 4 15 7,06 567 MSA SCBA Mask wl Amp 1.01(akliie nla 14 Jan-05 773 a 15 205 587 MSA SCBA Mask w7 Amp U11ra61der Ala 15 J IA -Da 773 4 15 206 567 MSA SC13A M65k wl Mm UlkaLlila ilia 18 Ja0•06 773 4 15 206 567 MSA SCBA MayitNd Amp UrtrnE11112 IHN 17 Jan•66 773 A 15 206 567 MSA SCBA Mask wl Arnp UI[raE1111 rva I 4ai1.05 773 A 15 206 567 MSA SCBA Mask r4 Amp L"IddBiv Na 19 Janis$ 773 4 15 206 507 MSA SCBA Mask wl Amq UltraElile rda ?D MA•p6 773 • 15 205 557 MSA SC RA Mask wl An1p kplfaeliw No 21 Jan-04 M 4 16 206 %7 MSA SCOA Mo6k WI Amp UIIraEbla tits 22 1811.05 773 A 15 206 567 MSA SCBA Mack Md Amp UiifAElile nip 23 Jan•06 773 4 65 206 567 November 2, 2009 4 Packet Pg. 419 8.2.d EFD Data Again Usoful ❑eprecAted item Model Serlalp Control Acquired coat Years Life Dopowation Vatne MSA SCBA Mask w1Amp UlifaElrto We 24 Jan•06 773 4 15 706 507 MSA SCBA Mask w7Amp UIIraE111e AM 2a Jam-06 773 4 15 206 567 MSA SCBA Mask w1Amp U111410n4 We 26 Jon•OB 773 4 15 200 567 MSA SCBA Mask Yw Amp UIIraFPte nra 27 Je5•06 773 4 15 206 E6 f MSA SCBA Mask W Amp UIIfa6Ille ilia 28 Jan•09 773 4 15 206 567 MSA 3CSA Mask wl Amp UIIrsOilo lira 7e Jon-06 773 4 Is 209 667 MSA SCBA Mask wtAmp Ullramile nfa 30 Jan-06 773 4 IS 206 5611 MSA SCBA Mask wl Amp UHMEkla rNa 31 Jan-06 773 A 15 205 567 MSA SCBA Mask wl Amp UIIraEllle No 32 Jon-ae 7 73 4 15 266 561 MSA SCBA Mask wt Amp UIIraEllle nm 33 Jan-0G 773 4 15 206 567 MSA SCBA Mask wl Arty] UI9aElile Ilia 34 Jan-0 773 4 10 206 567 MSA SCBA Mgsk wl Amp 4JIIraF.tlw IV'd 3S Jan-06 773 4 15 206 567 MSA SCOA Moak 0 Amp U103011rr run 36 Jari-go 773 4 15 206 567 MSA SCBA Mask wl Amp Ultrarwhis r4l7 37 "n•06 773 4 15 200 667 MSA SCBA Moak wl Amp UIIraElle rile 35 Jan-06 773 4 15 206 567 MSA SCBA Mosk wl Amp (Airaelile nla 39 Jan-06 773 4 15 200 06T MSA SCPA MBak wl An1p UIIraEllle We 40 Jail -OR 773 4 15 705 567 MSA 3CRA Mask wl APIA UWSEfld rua 41 Jen•06 773 4 15 206 %7 MSA SCeAMask MAmp 011raEfile ilia 42 Jan-00 773 4 16 206 667 MSA SCDA Mask wl Amp UIIraEllle fair 43 Jan-06 773 4 15 205 5B7 MSA SCBA Mask Nd Amp (AlraElite Ma 44 Jan-00 773 4 15 200 567 MSA SCBA Mask wlAmp UIIraElle fan 45 Jan•06 773 4 15 M 567 MSA SCf3A Mask WI Amp 0I1FARe nip 46 Jark06 773 4 1e, 205 567 MSA SCBA Mask wlAmp UIIraEllle No 47 Jan-06 773 4 16 206 567 MSA SODA Maak wlAmp tMraEkla aln 46 on-00 773 4 16 20G 567 MSA SCBA Mask wlAmp W)GEtile nla 49 Jan-06 773 4 15 206 567 MSA SCPiA Mosk wl Amp UllraPCle Wa 60 18n-06 773 4 15 k6 567 MSA SCBA MB7k vWAmp 01riElite +Ila 61 Jan-00 773 4 15 200 567 MSA SCBA Mask wl Amp UHIeCIi10 nle 62 Jan 06 773 4 i5 206 567 MSA SCBA Musa wlAmp U111BEMe nle 53 Jen-06 773 4 15 2D6 667 MSA SCBA Mask UIIr.If:k1a nla 54 Jars•06 442 4 +5 f 18 324 MSA SCBA Mask U11raEele Wo 56 Jan•06 442 4 15 t1a 324 MSA SCAR Maak UllraElllo 1118r 56 I'm 00 442 4 16 111 324 MSA SCBA Wall UllraCina rVa 57 Jan.05 W 4 15 118 324 MSA SCBA Mask UIIraElile NO U J41n.00 442 4 15 110 324 MSA SCBA Wsk UIIraEllle Not 59 Jan•05 442 4 13 lie 324 MSA SCBA Mcw, UIIfaMile nab Bt7 Jawo 448 4 15 t1a 324 MSA SCDA MBAk Upfacme nla 41 Jgn•OB 447 4 15 lie 324 MSA SCBA Mask UIIraEllla Via 62 Ja0-06 442 4 15 118 324 MSA SCBA Mask UIIraEllle Wo 03 41+I-06 442 4 15 118 324 MSA SCBA Mosk UIIraEllle nip C4 Jon•00 442 4 15 111 324 MSA 1CM } ael4L fW41Cf nfn 1QQ W39 ova Jan-p6 490 4 15 107 293 Sea Wo"n Rfl hetk H•60 ❑NE1198 1 Jam06 3,000 4 15 960 2,040 sad Vlremilm RIT N43 11-0 ON 61799 2 Jan•96 3,800 4 1.5 DUO 2,640 November 2, 2009 5 Packet Pg. 420 8.2.d EFD Data Age on useful DoprV010190 Item Model Seripi p Control N Acquired Cost Years Life Oelneclallon Value Sea W autoin RAT Peck H•60 ON 61113 3 Jan-K 3,600 4 15 960 2.640 MSA 60inln SCOA Air bollle H$Q ALT604 0405 88 OCV2000 25W 1 15 11 233 MSA Wrnin SCBA Air Willa H•80 ALT604 9385 69 002008 260 1 15 17 233 MSA 60min SCBA Air Mile N•GO ON 17039 90 OCV2000 250 1 15 17 233 MSA 601r11n SCBA Air 00111e H•60 ON 01473 41 NV2008 250 1 15 17 233 MSA 60min SCBA Air Baltic 11-60 ON 6948 92 DWN08 250 1 15 17 233 MSA 60min SCBA Air Mile 11•60 ON 5985 93 00"008 250 1 15 17 233 MSA Comm SCOA Air OoHie WOO ON 01412 94 OcV2008 250 1 15 17 233 MSA 60rnin SCBA Air flellle H•00 ON 01197 96 OcVY00e 250 1 15 tl 233 MSA 60min SCBA Air Balpe WOO ON 01469 98 OCII2008 760 1 15 '17 233 MSA 60iMA SCDA Air Wipe H•50 ON 01326 97 OCV2005 250 1 15 17 733 RASA BOmin SCBA Air B0111e H•00 ON 01312 98 002006 250 1 IS, 17 233 MSA 80min SCBA Air Banta H•60 ON 6003 99 OCV2008 260 1 15 17 233 MSA BOmin SCBA Air Bellie H•B0 ON 7139 100 000006 260 1 16 11 233 MSA 60min SCBA Air 8ollie H•60 ON 6748 101 Otir20OB 260 1 15 17 233 MSA 60miri SCBA Air Willa H-60 ON 01443 t02 Octf2008 250 1 15 17 233 MSA MKin SCBA Air come H-00 ON 7379 103 Oc112008 250 1 75 17 233 MSA 60rran SCBA Mr Dollla H-60 ON 01426 104 m0flo8 260 1 15 17 233 MSA flOmin SC13A Air Dallier rh60 ON 7133 105 Ocd2008 250 1 is 17 74 MSA 00mirf SCBA Air Soille H•60 ON 9745 106 OC117O08 750 1 SS 17 233 IC)TAL S 222.W S 58.399 L 164.1W TGTrlrrylr Coal F4'2 TO Coal 285102 serial number NA 750 NA NA 150 - Tufnvul L.oei Fite TO Copt '1097912 sentll nirmnef NA 750 NA NA 70 Tumoul Poet Fire 10 Coat 2139342 Serial number NA 750 NA NA 750 Twi wl Cow 1=ke 10 Coal seriel dumber NA f8D NA NA 150 Tuinoul Coal Fire TO Coal 1333812 WIN hummer NA 790 NA NA ISO - Ninow Cowl rire TO Coot 2020442 serral nulnlser NA 7N NA NA 700 Tufnoul Ct%W Fire TO Coal 110172 Serial dumber NA 750 NA NA 760 Tumwi Coal Hire TO Coal 5073202 aefN number NA 750 NA NA 70 Tvrnoul Coal Fire TO Coal serial number NA 750 NA NA 750 Tuinpul Coal Fire TO Coal 1012691 so*jl nurnuer NA 150 NA NA 750 Turnout Coal Fire 1-0 Cool 522002 serial number NA 750 NA NA 750 - Tumoul Coal t1re TO Coal 4914741 selfal number NA 750 NA NA 760 TutnoulCant Fife TO Coal 3787992 sefminumber NA 750 NA NA 750 TuleWl Coal Flee TO Coal 2601243 5wal rwinbar NA 150 NA NA 7* Turlmui Coal Fife To C681 7701462 anrinl rwnlber NA 760 NA NA 750 TurbWi6 Com rlre TO Coale 12511172 serial illrmbe NA 700 NA PIA 760 Turnout Coal rife TO Cool 2829234 serial number NA 7S0 NA NA 7,% 'turnout C,6w Nm TO Com 5611122 Serial nornber NA 780 NA NA 750 3 yrngµi Gear Fire 10 Coat Hertel nVmtror NA 760 NA NA 760 TunliniI Coal fire TO Coal 264062 seriel number NA ISO NA NA 750 YVlnout Coal fire 10 Cool 2307601 Serial number NA 760 NA NA 750 Turnout Char rlre TO Coal 2119742 5etiar number NA 75O NA NA 750 November 2, 2909 6 Packet Pg. 421 8.2.d *FO Data Age in UsaArl Dopreciatad Item Modal Serial conliol F Acquired Cast Years Lire Deproclallon Y91u0 Turnout Coat Fire TO Coat 3390452 serial Aurnw NA 750 NA NA 760 Turnoul Coal Fire TO C%t 160452 serial number NA 760 NA NA 750 Torrwut Coal Fire TO Coal 5752712 serial number NA 756 NA NA 160 Tumaul Coat Fire 70 Coat 11316972 genial nornber NA 75e NA NA 750 Turnout Coal Fire 70 Coat 2614342 Serial number NA 7w NA NA 7" Turnout Coal Fire TO Coat serial nwrtber NA 750 NA NA 750 Turnout Coal Fee TO Coal swill Nu"ar NA 750 NA NA 750 Turnout Coal Fire TO Coat serial nr,rrwer NA 750 NA NA 750 1 urnout Coal Fire TO Cual 4385331 serial number NA 750 NA NA 750 Turnout Coal Fire To Coat serial number NA 750 NA NA 7M Turnout Corti fire 70 Coat sera) number NA 750 HA NA 750 Turnout Coal Fire 70 Coat 1257912 Serial number NA 750 NA NA 750 Torroul Coal Fire TO Coat scrim number NA 750 NA NA 750 rurnaul Coal Fire TO Coal aerial nornaer NA 750 NA NA 760 Twmopl Coal Fire TO Coat 4480492 sarlal numhar NA 750 NA NA 750 rurnaul Perils Fire TO Pant 287612 6orial nurrilaw NA 750 NA NA 750 rurnoul Pants Fire TO Pam 12t1i302 serial number NA 150 NA NA 750 Turnout Pants Fire TO Pant 2203322 serial rwmoer NA ISO NA NA 760 Turnout Pants Rim To Pool 4; 08222 serial number NA 750 NA NA 750 Turnout Pants Fire TO Pant 2092612 salial riwm0er tfA 70 NA NA 750 Turnout Pants Fire ITO Pam 2014232 aw Al riumbef NA 750 NA NA 750 Tumoul Panic Piro 7q Peril 7302539 Solo number NA 750 NA NA 710 Turnout Penis Fire TO Pant 234122 semi number NA 7" NA NA rap rurnoul PAri18 FVe 70 Pant 8074A95 aerial number NA 75e NA NA ISO Twnoui.Panls Fne TO Panl 213D922 Serial number NA 750 NA NA 750 rurnoul Panes Fee TO Penl 1099582 serial number NA 150 NA NA 750 Turnoul Pants Fire TQ Pao 3788962 Sinai nuorkber NA 750 NA NA 150 Turnout Pants Fire TO Pant 3189562 serial number NA 750 NA NA 7" Turawl Pants Fire TO Pont 6650912 serial raini4xr NA 760 NA NA 750 Turnout Pants Fire To Paris 21AD432 serial number NA 750 NA NA 750 Turnwl Pants Fire TO Few 579101 serial number NA 750 NA Nil 760 Turnout Panrs Fire TO Pant 2629285 serial IwrMer NA M NA NA 750 Turnout Pants Fire TO Pant a75541? *CAW number NA M NA NA 750 I uinpul Pwsa Fire TO Pant 8581589 serial ritrmhcr NA Y j0 NA NA 750 Turnout Pants No TO Panl 285802 semi rwnrijer NA 750 NA NA 160 Turnwl Pants His TO Pant 2361322 serial number NA 160 NA NA 750 Turnwl PaniB Fire TO P.rnt 22033W. sonal nurrlDLY NA 75O NA NA 150 Turnoul P$nl4 Fire TO Psnl 1258G52 scrim number NA 750 NA NA 750 Turrtutrl flints Fire 10 Pant 1019512 serial nwnber NA 150 NA NA 750 Turnwl Pants Fire TO Pant 5780092 serial wariber NA 150 NA NA 750 Turnwl FraM Fire TO TAw 3044232 serial number NA 75a NA NA 750 rurnoul Pants fire TO Pawn 2553W s9nal number NA 750 NA NA 750 Turnout Pants Fire TO Pant 2" 1032 serial number NA 759 NA NA i50 Turnwl Pants Fire TO Pam 1570632 swan number NA 750 NA NA 760 November 2, 2009 7 Packet Pg. 422 8.2.d EFO Dato Ape In Useful ❑eproOated Item Model SON al4 Control Acquired COSt Yeats Life Dap nrrlauoit Value Tbrnoul Pans Fire TO Pan( 1079A32 isv ml number Turnout Pania Re TO Panl 3392492 aunal number Turnout Pans Fire TO Nm 5705562 sepal number Turnoui Prime Fire TO pant 6010612 aerial number Tumoul Pants Fire TO Pala 3664703 sepal number Tummil Pants Ro TO Pont 1099M aerial number Itirmir Pan1a Fire TO Pam 3700252 9eriai number Twnout Pants flm TO Pam 345470.1 serial number r4A 750 NA NA 750 NA 760 NA NA 759 hIA 750 NA NA 750 NA 750 NA NA 750 - NA 750 MA NA 750 NA 750 NA NA 750 - NA 750 NA NA 750 NA 750 NA NA 750 1-0101 S 55,500 i 55.500 Mulklgps dimovidr Ga$AlErl" 4 3.003558 215 1/28/1499 1.100 9 15 660 440 Mut6gas tlA19Clor GaWapIMop 4 L303-3ti66 210 W8119" 1,100 9 15 060 duo Mutltgm detomor GWIarlwx 4 0m-3594 235 11.1611999 1.100 g 15 M a40 Murligas deleOor G05A1or1Ma)F4 L=l 3055 220 112611999 1.1 W 9 15 664 44U TOTAL S 4.406 S 2.6110 S 1.180 Therrmtimagingdowire dullard 34686 214 10rM2004 10.250 5 15 3,a17 6,833 Thermal imaging demtu Dullard 31053 222 B1512004 10;250 5 15 .1,417 0,833 Thermal imagingdovico Argus 224 111111997 19.000 12 15 19,200 3,800 lhermalinlagingdeoce 13ullard 331D9 227 1213r200 10.250 16 4,100 6,100_ TOTAL $ 49750 S 26,133 5 23.617 DoOtx+llalnr LIM 500 11285120 231 UefitwoVitlu I f, 500 11285123 212 Derlbnsaim LP500 10553015 223 DeNtir."lar W 40 1 t2 T3716 225 OellBnnalor I.P 600 33273122 218 DufiStallaior LP 500 33279919 226 Deilmilatbf W 50D 33270918 217 Uefihnllafdr LP 500 33279011 213 DefibriAtBor LP 500 33279916 211 DeriLllualor LP500 33279915 229 i, abbriDa(br LP 500 103739.900749 271 DetRIMIMor LY 000 1120008 230 Delibrillglor I.P 500 11285130 230 Wibri0alurlrnonitpr LP 12 35225094 234 Wi11r1114100 OARW LP 12 27306V 219 DGibr111A1nrhndrst0f LP 12 NY3359D 7,33 Oalltry Chorgor USS 14D30821 232 Oaltery Chilli pi a55 M9N14 220 Venzoptftrgia5} &ackberry 8330 425.7544853 Wrimlwlre} oil oil got" 6330 425-754.4567 November 2, 2009 11112004 1481 5 10 741 141 11212904 1011 5 10 741 741 11M.W4 f,451 5 10 741 '141 11A12004 1481 5 10 711 741 1/512004 1 481 6 10 141 741 UW004 i d81 G 10 '141 141 1/7/2904 1.481 5 10 741 141 1/8/2004 1 A81 0 10 141 741 1/9/2004 1 •A81 5 10 741 741 111012DOA 1.481 S I 741 tat 10112004 1,481 ? 10 741 141 111 00A 1,491 9 10 7111 741 111312D04 t,461 5 10 741 141 2/1/2007 1g,fl75 2 t0 18Dr 15,7T0 1/1/2003 19,025 6 10 11,415 7,51D 1/1/2005 19,025 4 10 7.00 11,41b l rlr,2005 1.200 a 10 400 120 1/112003 1,200 D I 720 400 TOTAL 78 m S 33XV 5 45,072 0110120u8 201 ! 3 811 174 011012008 761 I 3 A7 114 0 Packet Pg. 423 8.2.d EFa Met Age in Useful Deprecleled Item Model 5e0411Y Controi0 Acquired Cos! Years Lr?e DepreciAtIon VGIuO VanzOn WirelOss Blackberry 8330 A25508.2753 611012008 261 1 5 S7 174 Vofixon wira?855 Slatltberry 6330 d2$454.1829 61VW2006 2*1 1 3 87 174 Vurizon Wiroles6 Mockberry 8330 425-T54-1898 011012008 261 1 3 87 174 Vokon Wrreies6 Blackberry 0330 425.754.1887 Ell012008 261 1 3 87 I M Venzon Wirewss Blackberry B330 426-754.1826 8/1012008 261 1 3 87 174 Verizon Wirelebs Blackberry 8330 425.754.1837 Oil W20DS 261 + 3 87 174 37 One Typo Verimn Wii Rim Casio 5 425-754-194D W1 W20N 261 1 3 87 174 Ge Ona Type Vent on Wiialess Casio 5 425-754.1917 Gel012W 261 1 3 87 174 G2 Orta Typa Vorizon W1retorm Casio 5 425.754-19G2 SAID12008 761 1 3 87 174 GZ Oil I! Type Venxon Wireless Casio 5 425.754.1910 611012008 261 1 3 97 174 G'z ❑n0 lypa Velizon Wlrele56 Casio S 426.754.1740 611OWN 261 1 3 87 174 Gz One T ylxt VerIZOD Wlrbless Canru $ 425454.2026 61IONO" 761 I 3 87 $74 Gz Ontk Type Verixon Wireless Cask) S 425.754.9710 oil WOOS 261 1 3 81 174 TOTAL i 3.g16 $ 1,38E S 2,610 MTS 2DDO SOD MHz pc+rlable radio model It 763333 55 1/29/2002 21S5G 1 8 7.231 320 MTS 2000 800 Miiz pwlaol0 radio model II 763332 18 2l112002 2,353 7 5 2,237 320 MTS 2000 800 Nitta portable ramp model It 763331 56 21IM= 2,555 7 S 2123T 320 MTS 2000 800 Wit porlBWo radio model II 763335 18 1/14/2002 2,558 7 8 2,217 320 MTS 20n0 500 MHz ponabla radw mode! It 763295 7.237 320 MTS 2000 800 MHz 901010 rod10 m6d01 II 763307 23 i!2l2002 2,55G r 6 2,237 320 MT$ 2006 80DMHz ponaWe,aft model 11 163*4 930 113/2002 Z.5ta8 + $ 2,287 320 MTS 2000 a06MHz pollebl0 "30-0 Model: 11 163300 24 114l2o0T 7,556 If a 2,231 320 MTS 200D 800 MHz 90nable radw modem It 7633o4 20 115l2002 2,550 7 a 7,237 Wo MTS 2600 B00 M+tz ponablo radio moor m 11 163200 71 116=2 2,550 T a 2,237 320 MTS 2DD5 800 WU 000ADle rsdlo model II 76330$ 12 1/7/2002 7,556 T A 2,237 320 MIS 2000 800 W4, pOrlable otdid model II 763306 13 1!8l20D2 2,556 1 a 2,237 320 MTS 20DO Sao MHt p0lla61C radio model It 763200 53 119120D2 2,65G 1 8 2,237 320 MT5 2000 800 w, portable radio model 11 763286 268 1/10/2002 2,556 D 2,237 370 MTS 2000 800 MHe portable raft model II 783293 17 11114002 2,656 7 a 2.237 320 MTS 2000 BOO MHz pdrlaWa rndrd modtd 11 703251 54 1112/2002 2,556 1 8 2,237 320 MTS 2500 000 Wilk ponabfd radio model II 163301 14 111312p02 2,560 1 8 2,237 320 MTS 2000 800 MHz porteele radio nxwel II 163298 42 1115l2002 Y,550 1 6 2,237 320 MTS 2000 800 MHz polloue rpolp modal II 763302 44 111612067 2,556 r 8 2,237 320 MTS 2000 806 MHz purlabie radio Model II 763281 45 1117/2002 7.556 7 8 21237 320 MTS WOOD $00 MHt porlebiu radio modol II 7133305 47 111812002 Z856 7 8 UP 320 MTS 2D00 800 W Iz porlhble rad[p modrl II 703292 44 1119120M 21 VA 7 e 7,237 320 MTS 2000 800 MI•Iz pprl0dof die model 11 703303 40 W00002 2,b5r 1 8 2,237 320 M i 5 2000 900MHz pdr+a Wernnl❑ nwdel11 703280 97 1i21r2002 2,656 r S 2,237 320 MTS 200D 600 MNr potwlwe radld mlwdel It 763309 98 1/2212007 2,556 1 8 7,237 320 MTS 2000 800 MHz owlable rodro mode? 11 76UP 241 11231,7002 2,558 7 8 2.237 120 Mrs 200D 800 MHz pdNatAe rattio Mdel d 763260 1l2412002 U56 7 8 2,231 320 MTS 2000 600 MHz podoWo Culp model 0 763282 20e 1JZW2002 2 ti5G 1 8 21231 U0 MTS 2000 800 MHz portable two mar ei II 103285 1/2612002 2,566 1 S 2,237 320 November 2, 2009 9 Packet Pg. 424 8.2.d FPO Rate Age In Useful aepreelatod ttom Model Serlal r! Control 9 Acquired Cost Yeors LHe DeprgQlallon Value MTS 2000 $00 MHz povabte radio model II 763284 1427/2002 2.566 7 S 2,237 326 Mrs 2000 800 MHz porlsble ratio model II 763263 112812pm 2,506 7 8 2.237 320 MTS 2000 V0 MH7. potlaol9 radio medst II 763330 67 1130/2002 2,056 7 $ 21237 320 MTS 21D00 800 MHz portable radio =06 II 763334 210 1131i200R 2,5% 1 8 2,237 320 MTS 2000 600 MHz porl"Ne raoid model ll 70333B ?09 2131P002 2.656 8 2,237 320 000 MHz porWdlu radio %TS 2500 763337 TOTAL 21412002 2.558 7 8 2,237 320 TOTAL 5 89.450 5 78.270 $ 11.183 FINAL FIkAt TOTAL TOTAL 504.310 255.911 24$ 399 November 2, 2009 N Packet Pg. 425 8.2.d TABLE 12 ON -BOARD EQUIPMENT DETAIL Engine 16, '17, And 20 Common On -Board Equipment Engineers Seat: Est. Cost 4 Gas Munitar $ - Traffic Vest '15-00 Engineer Headset Interface 500.00 MSA Cover Lens, 1 Box Helmet Shield 10.00 1OBC Sodium Bicarh Extinguisher 100-00 Pump Panel Speedo Cable 35.00 Ear Plugs 1,00 Particle Masks 1,00 9-V Batteries 1.00 Infrared Non -Contact Thermometer 60-00 $ 723 Officer Seat: Polaroid Camera wl Spare Film $ 10.00 Binoculars, Glove Box 50.00 Officer Helmet Shield 10,00 SCBA Report Can 45.00 Marina Key Box Customer Service Binder Digital Carnera wlCase 85.00 first Aid Kit Smoke Detractors, 9-V Batteries 5,00 $ ?,05 Engine Cowling: Supra Box, Edmonds, MI-T, $ 45.00 MDC - TIBNIc Vest 15.00 SCFD 1 Keys - $ 60 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 426 8.2.d Dashboard: City Shop Keys/Fuel Key Bay Door Openef Passports, Red, White Note Pad Clipboard Latex Gloves, 1 Box Cell Phone Reference Material: Edmonds, SWSC Map Back MLT Map Book SCF❑ 1 Map Book Thomas Brothers Map Highlands Map, Shoreline Miscellaneous Forms, Maps, SOGs Edmonds Pre -Fire Plans Edmonds Apartment Book SCFD 1 Pre -Fire flans Windshield Survey Packet DOT Emergency Response Guide SWSC Hazmat Response Guido EINHS Laminated Floor Plan, 2 Accident Report Packet Sumpseat Thermal Imaging Camera w/Extfa Batt. Picts Head Axe (2) Filter Mask Truck Kit Traffic Vests (2) SCBA (2) Boxtights (2) Latex Gloves, 1 Box November 2, 2009 12 BI 5.00 5.00 5.00 5A0 $ 20 1 D.00 2,00 $ 12 150.00 250.00 20.00 250.00 5,00 Packet Pg. 427 8.2.d Search Rope Bag -15.00 Wildland Shirts 35.00 Helmet Shields (2) 20.00 Drinking Water, Case 5,00 Transverse Hose Bed 200' 1 3/4" Preconnect, Forward $ 500.00 200' 1 314" Preconnect, Rear 500.00 Hydrant box: Hydrant Wrench $ 70.00 Spanner Wrench (2) 20.00 4 112" NST x 4" Stortz 100.00 4" PCT x 4" Stortz 100.00 Hydrant Gate 200.00 2 112" x 4" Stortz 100.00 4" Stortz x 5" Stortz 100.00 Rear Hose Bed 200' 1 314" PreGonnect $ 500.00 f3ackboard 50.00 Spanner Wrenches (2) 20.00 50' 2 112" Sprinkler Bundle (2) 2B0,00 500' 2 112" Reverse w/ Nozzle 1,000.00 1.50' 1 3/4" Apt. Bundle w/Galed Wye 400.00 150' 1 314" Bundle QUO 900' 4" Supply 5,000.00 200' 2 112" Preconnact 650.00 28' 4" Soft Suction 300.00 Fiower Pat 5 Gallons Alcohol Resistant FFFP November 2, 2009 13 $ 760 $ 1,000 $ 690 $ 8,600 Packet Pg. 428 8.2.d $ 75.00 Traffic Cones (9) 160,00 5 Gallon Buckets Absorbent t2y 60,00 5 Gallon Class A Foam 70.00 200' Boost Line, Manual RW Handle 500.00 Ladder Rack 28' Extension Ladder $ 600.00 Adiuslable Ladder Hook 25.00 14' Roof Ladder 250.00 10' Attic Ladder 185.00 12' Pike Pole 75.00 6' pike Pale 50.00 Spare SCBA Bottle Storage Spare Battles (.4) Transverse Compartment (1) Rubbish Hoak $ 150.00 Flinger 36 100.00 Push Broom 15,00 Broom 10.00 Water Keys (3) 5.00 Street Valve key 5.00 50' 2 1 �2" Supply 145.00 Road Flares 20.00 Smoke Fares 10.00 Round Nose Shovel 10.00 Square Nose Shovel 10,00 Floor Squeegee 10.00 Gas Key 1.00 Scene Tape November 2, 2009 14 $ 045 Packet Pg. 429 8.2.d IC Vests Command, Safety IC Kit Duct Tape Large Pry Bar Engineer Compartment (2) Foam Aerator on TFT nozzle Tool Box Spare Gloves, 2 Pair 1 V2" to Garden Hose 2 112" female Cap 2 112" Double Female, 2 Ultra Wipes, 1 Box Compact Garden Hose Spanner Wrenches, 2 Chimney Nozzle Ness Air Chuck Rubber Mallet Hydrant Wrench Silicone Spray Hose Strap AC Hot $tick 2 112" Double Male, 2 2 112" x 1 112" Reducer, 3 2 V2" Female x 4" Stor(z 4" x 5" Stortz 2 112" x 1 112" Gated Wye 1 114" Smooth Bore Tip Masler Stream Fog Tip Latex Gloves, 1 Box November 2, 2009 15 10,00 25.00 100.00 5.00 25.00 $ 150.00 25000 25.00 45.00 45.00 45.00 15.00 15.00 12.00 75.00 15.00 10.00 70.00 10.00 5.00 275.00 75.00 60-00 75.00 175.00 175.00 50.00 $00.00 5.00 $ 666 Packet Pg. 430 8.2.d Left Upper Forward Compartment (3) 5 Gallon Class A Foam $ 70.00 5 Gallon Aicohol Resistant FFFP 76.00 Portable Monitor Stand 250.00 Engineer's SCBA - Spare SCBA Mask SCBA lens Covers - Foam Eductor 450.00 4A60t3C Dry Chemicaf Extinguisher 50.00 HazMaVAnlhrax Response Kit 100.00 Left Upper Rear Compartment (4) Pierring Nozzle $ 400.00 Sprinkler Kit 150.00 Sledge Hammer 26.00 Hay Hooks (2) 15.00 Windshieid Saw 150.00 Come -A -Lang 75.00 Pulaski 50.00 Halligan Tool 150.00 Flat Head Axe 100.00 24" Wrecking Bar 25.00 2 112 Gallon Pressurized Water Ext, 100-00 RIT [lag 30" Closet Hook 50.00 36" Bolt Gutter 125-00 K-Tool 125.00 R-Tool 'I 50.00 Elevator Keys 175.00 Left Lower Rear Compartment (5) November 2, 2009 16 $ 2,277 $ 995 $ 1,865 Packet Pg. 431 8.2.d 50 LB Flashlight $ 800.00 Lazy Susan 10.00 PPV Fan 11600,00 Half Hanson Manifold 500.00 Coflapsible Traffic Cones (8) 150,00 Rear Roll -up Compartment (8) Cribbing, Various $ 20.00 Amkus Combi-Tool 5,000.00 Amkus Power Plant 2,500.00 Right Rear Upper Compartment (7) Salvage Kit $ 76.00 Lathe and Visqueen 50.00 Hearing Protection 20,00 Stapler 10.00 Bar Oil 5.00 2 Gallons Straight Fuel 5.00 2 Gallons Mixed Fuel 5.00 Hammers (2) 10,00 Chainsaw wlTool Pouch 1,500.00 Air Chisel 500.00 Saws All 100,00 Funnels (3) 5,00 Right Lower Rear Compartment (8) Airbag ManifoldlHoses (3) $ 300,00 Air Bags (2) 1,000,00 Step Blocks 200.00 12 Ton Hydraulic Jack 40,00 N(�vernber 2, 2Qp9 ]7 $ 3,060 $ 7.520 $ 2,285 Packet Pg. 432 8.2.d Right Upper Front Compartment (9) Poly Tarp (2) $ 25.00 Salvage Cover (2) 100.00 Canvas Hall Runner (1 ) 50A0 Sam Splints (1) 15.00 Triage Belt (2) 15.00 Backboard Kit 45.00 Catch -All 25M Defibrillator Aid Kit 150.00 Oxygen Kit 75.00 Infection Control Kits (4) 40,00 Cardboard Splints 25.00 Medic Airway Kit 750.00 DZium 5.00 Right Lower Front Compartment (10) Haxmat Spill Kit $ 50.00 Catch Pan 20.00 Right Side Midship Compartment (11) 75' Water Throw Rope Float Ring wWobbing PFO (4) Swim Fins, 1 Pair 200' Water Rescue Retrieval Bag Technical Rescue Rape Bag Utility Dope Bag November 2, 2009 F $ 50.00 50.00 300.00 25,00 11000.00 300.00 25-00 $ 1,540 $ 1,320 $ 70 $ 1,750 $37,428 Packet Pg. 433 8.2.d Ladder 20 Specific, On -Board Equipment COST Engineers Seat: Polaroid Camera W Spare Film $ 10.00 Par Piugs 5.00 Smoke Detectors (2) 10.00 RA Kit 10.00 Cab Tilt Control 10BC Sodium Bicarbonate Extinguisher 45.00 Spare SC8A Mask - 9-V Batteries 2.00 Note Pad - Home Smoke Detector Paperwork - Rags+2y - Heat Detector %00 Officers: 1CS Kit $ 100.00 Officer Hei met Shield 10.00 Ladder Belt Lanyard 100.00 SCSA - Dashboard: Offraer Shlold $ 10-00 Cell Phone - Pass Tags 10.00 Garage Door Opener 6.00 Engine Cowling: Supra Box wl Keys $ 45.00 Officers Portable Radio - Engineers Porlab)e Radio November 2, 2009 19 $ 52 $ 210 $ 25 a Packet Pg. 434 8.2.d 800 MHz Portable Radio - Note Pad 1.00 Latex Gloves,1 Sox 5.00 Edmonds Map Book - Apartment Book Pre -Fire Book Shoreline Map After the Flre Handoute Atrlift Set -Up EWH5 Map Windshield Survey Kit 5.00 Hazmat Guidelines - Bridge Weight Capaolty Sheet - Thomas Guide 10.00 Rescue Operations Manual Status Board 25,00 Glove Box: Gincoulars $ 100,00 Alr Shore Manual Hepa Mask 10.00 ATC 20 Earthquake Manual - EmergenUy Response Guide Book Chern-Bio Handbook 16.00 Compartment #3 150' 13WApartment Pack wl NozzlelGated Wye $ 400.00 Backboard 50.00 Plastic Broom Handle 5.00 Wooden Broom Handle 5.00 Wood Squeegoe Handle (2) 10.00 November 2, 2009 20 $ 91 $ 125 Packet Pg. 435 8.2.d Finch Prybars (2) ALS Airway Kit Compartment #4 Plastic Tarps (4) Hall Runners (2) Catch All 02 Kit Traffic Cones (8) Trauma Bag RiT Bag Bloodborne Pathogen KII Triage Belt Auto Deflb Ilectric Fan C Collar Kit Aid Klt Compartment #5 Amkus Electric Power Plant Spare Hydraulic Hose Une, 40' Alrbatd Control Box Airbag w! Shut off (3) Air Chisel Glass Saw Rocker Panel Plate W Indow Punch Airbag Pads (2) LOTO Kite Compartment #7 Amkus Spreader November 2, 2009 21 20,00 750.00 $ 1,240 $ 60.00 100.00 25.00 75.00 150.00 150.00 40.00 15.00 700.00 100.00 150.00 $ 1,56s $ 2,500.00 500.00 100.00 200.00 500.00 100-UD 50.00 15,00 5.00 $ 3,970 $ 250 Packet Pg. 436 8.2.d Amkus Cutter Amkus Pam Ram Extender Barg of Chains Compartment #8 Honda Generator/ Floodlight Dry Chemical Extinguisher SON Forcible Entry Circular Saw Stihl T5700 Circular Saw SUN Blade Kits (2) Twisllock to Standard Adapters (2) 50' Twistlock extension Cord (2) 25' Standard Extension Cord Compartment #15 Main Line Bag, 300' Belay Bag, 300' Patient Access Package Rope Bags, 200% (3) Aztec Bags (4) Dynamic Rope, 1 G5' Edge Proteclion Bag Tower Bag Tech Rigging Gear Bag Jigger Spare Tech Bag Transverse Crosstrad; 200' 1 W Preconnect (2) 150' 2'/2" Prpconnect (2) November 2, 2009 $ 5,000.00 5,000.00 3.500.00 500.00 i5G.00 $ 14,150 $ 800,00 50,00 2,000Z 1,800,00 150.00 25.00 100.00 25,00 $ 4,950 15UG 150.00 200.00 300.00 50.00 150.00 150,00 150,00 '160.00 35.00 150.00 $ 1,635 $ 500.00 --400-00 22 Packet Pg. 437 8.2.d $ 900 Compartment #16 Extension Ladder, 35' $ 800,00 Extension Ladder, 28' 650,00 Extension Ladder, 24' 550.00 Roof Ladder, 18' (2) 300,00 Attic Ladder, 10' 185,00 NY Pike Pole, 12' 75.00 Pike Pole, 12' 75.00 Sheet Rock Pale, 12' 75.OU Plaster Pole, 0' 70.00 Pike Pole, 8' 70.00 Multl Purpose Hook, 8' 70.00 Rubbish Hook, 6' (2) 50.00 Multi Purpose Hook, 6' 50.00 $ 3,020 Miscellaneous Exterior Equipment! SCBA Air Bottles (8) Small Spanner Wrench (4) $ 40.00 Large Spanner Wrench (4) 40.00 Wheel Chocks (4) - OutrIgger Pads (4) $ 80 Right Side Step: Irons, Flat Head Axe, Halligan Tool $ 400 Basket; Flat Head Axe $ 100.00 Halligan Tool 150.00 100' 1'/" Preconnects (2) 500.00 SCBA Connector Hose (2) Shock Absorbing Ladder Bell Lanyard (3) 100.00 Ladder Belts (2) 100.00_ November 2, 2009 23 $ 990 Packet Pg. 438 8.2.d Aerial: Roof Ladder, 12. Rear Cab: SCBA (3) Ladder Belt Lanyard (3) Dewalt Charger/Battery Flashlights (4) Thermal Imaging Camera Pick Head Axe (2) 2.5 Galion PMI Ext. Cold Water Suit Swim Fins Retrieval line 4 Gas Detector Compartment tit PFD (4) Throw Ring Yellow Webbing Throw Bag Compartment #2 Hydrant Wrench Small Tool Sag DuctTaPe Scene Tape Can of Spray Silleone Paper Towels, 1 Box Garbage Begs, 1 Roll Rubber Mallet 2Ys" Gated Wye Aerator Nozzle Eductor November 2, 2009 24 $ 300.00 75.00 400.00 150.00 75.00 700.00 25.00 100.00 $ 70.00 100.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 '15.00 5.00 10.00 175.00 10❑.00 $ 240 Packet Pg. 439 8.2.d Stack Tlp-1,1.126,1.25 1 Yp' Fog Nozzle Hazard Tape Compartment #2 2/:" Cap (2) 2%' Female Adapter (2) 21/2` Male Adapter (2) 4W Thre-4" Stortz Adap 4" to 5" Stortz Adapter 4" Thre-4'h" Thre Adap 2'/a" Thre-4" Stortz Adap Large Spanner (2) Gar Hose w11'I " Reducer 2'la" Hose Air Fill Adapter 4" Hose, 30' 2''W' Ball Valve 2Y,"-1'/;' Reducer (2) Compartment #9 Can Straight Fuel Can Mix Fuel Funnel (2) Stihl 044 Chainsaw (2) Chainsaw Tool Bag Bar Oil, 1 Container SUN Flectric Chainsaw FPU Power Card Gas Fan Compartment #10 Step Crlh Blocks (4) November 2, 2009 25 450.00 175.00 500.00 5.00 $ 20.00 45.00 75.00 100.00 175.00 140.00 100.00 20,00 30.00 25.00 300.00 250,00 4000 $ 5-00 5.00 5.00 700.00 150.00 5.00 150.00 50.00 1,600-00 $ 400.00 $ 1,625 $ 1,280 $ 2,570 Packet Pg. 440 8.2.d 2x4 Cribbing (3) 4x4 Wedge (6) Tens Buttress Bases (2) Cribbing Bag Compartment *12 LSP Halfback 8 ked 4 : 1 Haul System Arizona Vortex Compartment #11 Water (24) Gas Key Mop Compartment #13 Communication System CSR Blower and Duct Patient SABA. Oran Bag Supplied Air Manifold Entrant Bags (2) SABA Line Bags (4) Compartment 414 3' Multi Purpose Hook Spade Shovel Flat Shovel Small Spade Shovel Hand Shovel Push Broom Heads (3) Squeegee Heads (2) 4x4 for Tens Buttress (2) November 2, 2009 26 50.00 5U0 50,00 50.00 $ 1,000.00 450.00 300.00 2.500,00 $ 5.00 1.00 5.00 $ 600 $ 4,250 $ 11 $ 1,000.00 400.00 500.00 250.00 1,000.00 500.00 $ 3,650 $ 50.00 15.00 15.OU 10,00 10.00 1500 10.00 Packet Pg. 441 8.2.d Hazmat Response Bag Oil Drain Pan Special Hazard Bucket Bucket of Absorbent Water Kay ❑usl Pars Aerial Side Box: Rubbish Hook, 8' NY Roof Hoak, 6' SS Stokes Basket Patient Packaging Bag Litter Shield Spider Bag Hose Bed: 4" Supply Hose, 700' Hydrant Bag: Hydrant Wrench Spanner Wrench 21/2" Ball Valve 21h" to 4" Stortz Adapter 4" Threaded to 4" Stortz 4'/2" Threaded to 4" Stortz 4" to 5" Stortz Flower Pot: Litter Wheel Large Scoop Shovel November 2, 2009 27 20.00 50,00 25.00 10,00 50.00 5.00 5,00 $ T5.00 MOO 760.00 200,00 %00 50.00 70.00 20,00 125.00 60.00 100.00 100-00 ---175_00. $ 800.00 15.00 $ 290 $ 1,195 $ 3,500 $ 650 $ 615 $ 56,519 Packet Pg. 442 8.2.d Medic 17 specific, On -Board Equipment COST Jumper Cables $ 15,00 Toot Box 250.00 Broom 10,00 Backboard 50.00 PFID (2) 160.00 Shelf "C" Inventory, ParaPac PMI Pump Refrigerator Shelf "D" Inventory: Infection Control Kits Racal Masks Protective Glasses Portable Suction BP Auto Cuff Shelf "E" Inventory' Airway Box Shelf "F" Inventory. Auto Vent 02 Bottle Reg and Pigtali Advil Electrodes Ped Electrodes LP Batteries LP12 ECG Paper Thigh Cuff November 2, 2009 28 $ 485 $ 100.00 60.00 $ 160 $ 10.00 10,00 15.00 500.00 50.00 $ 2,000.00 50.00 20.(0 20.00 50,00 20.00 $ 585 $ 1,200 _ a) E d d L a O i (D r 2 0 d L_ U_ d s _ O tM _ �L 4) 2 a N _ d E U Q 0 0 N O _ .M O L O U c m E s .r a Packet Pg. 443 8.2.d Pediatric Sox BP Cuffs LifePak-12 Soft Seat Pad Quik-Combo Adult Quik-Combo EGG Cables Trauma Gloves, XL Gloves, Small Gloves, Medium Gloves, Lame Gloves, XI - Auto Batter}as (2) Driver seat: Helmet Shield Door Opener Binoculars Passports: Red, White Key Box: Edmonds, MILT, Lynnwood, SCF❑ 1 Traffic Vests (4) Shelf "B" Inventory: Rescue Mask 02 Pigtail Ultrasound Gel 5% Dextrose 50 nil Bag Adult BVM Emergency Blankets November 2, 2009 29 10.00 400,00 25.00 35.00 35.00 35.00 50.00 5,00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 $ 2.775 $ 10.00 100.00 10.00 10.00 40.00 $ 170 10.00 5,00 2.00 10.00 5,00 Packet Pg. 444 8.2.d Comb) -rube NS U00 ml Power Vent wlPlgtail Doparnine Premix Want BVM 10 gttslml Solul Ion Sets 60 gtislml Veni Pump Sets 20% Mannitol Doppler t_idocalne Premix Pods SVM Suction Canislpr Cyanlde Antidote Kit 1.V, Heater Tetrachine (X5) Cpl 11,000 (X2) 6acteriostatic H2❑ Tylenol Suppository (X10) Dexamethasone Albutnrol (X3) Benadryl (X2) INTO Ointment Mpatches NS 20rn1 Vial 5orbIlot Lub Jelly (M) Norcuron (X2) Mag Sulfate (M) Glucagon AM n Atrovent (M) Solu Modrol 125mg (X2) November 2, 20D9 30 50.00 10.00 500.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 5,00 25.00 5.00 MOO 5.00 100.00 100.00 50.00 10,00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 50.00 3.00 5.00 10 OCF Packet Pg. 445 8.2.d Solu Medrol 2gm (X2) ASA Narcan (X6) Ipecac Ammonia Inhalant {X6y Adenocard (X3) Phenergan (X5) NS Bullets (X3) NTG Spray (X2) Amiodarone (X5) Activated Charcoal Drawer "V Inventory: Laryngeal Scope Adult Handle Laryngeal Scope Ped Handle Magil Forceps (X2) Laryng-a-Jet Kit Lido 4% (X2) ETT one each size ETT Holder Adult (X2) Tongue Depresser(X5) Laryngeal Scope #1 Mac Laryngeal Scope #2 Mac Laryngeal Scope #3 Mac Larynegeal Scope #4 Mac Scapel (X2) ETT Holder Pod (X2} 10 cc Syringe (X4) Laryngeal Scope #00 Miller Laryngeal Scope Ito Miller Laryngeal Scope #1 Miller Larynegeal Scope #2 Miller Larynegeal Scope Ito Miller November 2, 2009 31 20.00 3.00 10.00 2-00 40. 00 50.00 10.00 20.0E 10.00 10.00 $ 1,235 20.00 20.00 20.00 5.00 12X0 5.00 5.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 20,00 2.00 5.00 2A0 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 Packet Pg. 446 8.2.d Meconuim Aspirator (M) Minicap CO2 Detector Benchaeat Compartment Inventory: On top of Bench; Pulseoximeter Underneath Bench: MCI Kil Pillow 61P Cuff ICS Kit Linen Stethoscope Digital Thermometer PediMate Bedpan and Urinal (M) Shelf "G" Inventory: Ace Bandage Posey (M ) 2' Taps (M) Kling (M) The Hood (M2) Trauma Scissors 8" x 10" (M) She{f "H" inventory; 60 gts Solution Set (x10Y Reg IV Fxt Set Dial -A -Flo NS 250rnl (X6) November 2, 2909 32 20.00 3,00 10.00 100.00 20.00 2,00 5,00 100.00 2.00 35.00 300,00 25.00 6,00 2.00 20.00 4.00 6,00 5.00 5,00 5.00 $ 2.00 2.0o 2.00 2,00 $ 289 $ 642 8 Packet Pg. 447 8.2.d Drawer "9" Inventory: Interiink (X10) 22 ga Butterfly (X2) 18 go Needle (X10) Dual Injection Site (X3) Bandaids (X10) Iodine Preps (X20) Level Lack Carnnula 1❑ ga IV 3" (X2) 14 ga IV (X8) 20 go IV (XO) B;untTip (X10) 23 ga Butterfly tX2) 20 ga Needle (X10) Tubex Syringe Tourniquets (X10) Alcohol Preps (X20) VeN Guards (X10) 12 go IV 3" (X2) 16 go IV (X8) 22 ga IV (Xa) 19 ga Butterfly (X2) Filter Needle (X10) 22 ja Needle (X10) Tubex NS 2mt (X10) Leverlocks 2° x 2" (x10) Saline Lock kits (X6) 14 ga IV 1,75" (X2) 18 ga IV (X13) 24 go IV (Xa) November 2, 2009 33 $ 10A0 4,00 10.00 6.00 5,00 5,00 5.00 5.00 10,00 10.00 10.00 3.00 10.00 5.00 10,00 2.00 20.00 3.00 3,00 3,00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 6.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Packet Pg. 448 8.2.d Shelf "J" Inventory: Backup Airway Sox Backup 5-Mlnute Box LifePak 10 36 fr Nasal Airway (1) 30 fr Nasal Airway (1) 26 fr Nasal Airway (1) 22 fr Nasal Airway (1) 20 fr Nasal Airway (1) 40 mm Oral Airway (1) 60 mm Oral Airway (1) 80 mm Oral Airway (1) 90 mm Oral Airway (1) 100 mm Oral Airway (1 } Sterile Lubricating Jelly (5) 2% Lidocalne JWy (3) Kling (1) 12 ga 3" Angiccaths (2) 16 go 5" Anglocelh (1) Cricothyrotomy Kit (1) Stylet, Large Stylet, Small McGill Forceps, Large McGill Forceps, Small 10cc Sy0nge (2) 9.0 ET Tube Between seats; VHF Portable Radio 800 MHz Portable Radio Flashlights Edmonds Grids November 2, 2009 $ 166 $ 11000-00 1,200.00 500,00 2,00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1,00 1,ao 1.00 2.00 2.00 120.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 5.00 2,00 $ 2,863 100.00 34 Packet Pg. 449 8.2.d Lynnwood Grids SCFD 1 Grids MLT Grids SCF❑ 1 Multi -Family I_oc Grids Thomas 13rothem Map gook Edmonds Apartment Book Shoreline Map Dash: VHF Mobile Radio 800 MHx Radio File Box: Rehab Forms Refusal Forms Stevens Directions and Map Emergency Response Guide Book Nursing Drug Guide King County MCI Guide Folded Face Masks (2) Camera Officers Helmet Shield Single Use Camera (2) Shelf "A" inventory: Newborn Support Kits (2) Nu-Trake Tracheal Tube Introducer (X2) Sterile Water tX3) Asherman Cx Seat (X3) Infectious Control Kil (X2) IQ Device, Trial November 2, 2009 35 10.00 $ 110 10.00 5.00 10.00 10.00 5.00 20.00 100.00 20.00 6.00 30.00 20,00 500.00 40 .r c m E a� d L Q 0 `m c r �L N m L_ LL 0 aM E 2 3 a N ti c a� E t U c� Q 0 0 N C T L 0 U r c 0 U r C d E t U ca Q Packet Pg. 450 8.2.d Transtracheai Cat/Vent Kit 250-00 Cook Retrograde Intubatlon Set Porta-Warm Mattresse 20.00 Sigtronics, Head Set 10.00 Turkel Safety Thoracentesis (X3) 60.00 Tyvex Suits (X2) 25.00 Easy Trach 50.00 Melker Cricothyotomy Cath Set 100.00 Sharp - Trap (M) 15.00 Aaron Lighted Stylette 25.00 Fluid Shields 5.00 Germicidal Wipes 5,00 Drawer "2" Inventory: N/C Adult (XG) $ 6,00 NRM Adult (M) 4.00 02 Tubing Exl. (X2) 2.00 WC Peds (M) 4.00 NRM Peds (M) 4.00 FtCa2 Fllterline Set AdulUPed (M) 4,00 Smart Capnollne 02 (M) 40.00 NG Tube 14 & 16 (X2) 5.00 Sucti Tubing 8,10,12.14,16,18fr (2 ea) 24.00 Suction Connecting Tubing (X4) 400 Yankauer(M) 8.00 ❑rawer "4" Inventory: Broseiow Tape $ 10,00 Fire and Rescue Field Guide Pert Crash Cards 2.00 AA Batteries (M) 8.00 Versed (X2) 4.00 November 2, 2009 36 $ 1,251 $ 105 Packet Pg. 451 8.2.d Valium (X1O) Spare Pens PocketMed Russian Polaroid Film (X2) C BatterieS (X6) Morphine (X10) Fentanyl (X10) EMS Field Guide PockekMetd Spanish 9-V Batteries (X3) Drug Log Book Luminal (X4) Nerve Agent Antidote Kit (X7) Ativan WO) Drawer "5" Inventory, NPA Kits (X2) BVM Masks in assorted sizes Nebulizer (X4) OPA (X2) Adull Neb Mask Neb Bag to Mask Kit(X2) Ped Neb Mask Shelf "I" Inventory: Hot Packs (X6) 4" 0" (40 ) Hemostats (X3) Pmesls Bag (X4) Ice Packs (X6) Lancets ()(20) Tongue Depfessers(X12) November 2, 2009 37 20.00 10,00 12.00 10.00 10.00 fi-00 4.00 10.00 $ 106 $ 1000 30.00 8.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 $ 12,00 20.00 6.00 4.00 6.00 7.00 12.00 $ 73 Packet Pg. 452 8.2.d Gfucorneter Trauma Sheets Trauma Dressing NTG Spray (X3) V Tape (X2) Thermometers Hypo/Hyper (X4) Drawer "T' Inventory: Epi 1;10,000 (X12) 8.4% Sodium Bicarbonate (M) Lidocaine 2% (X5) 25% Dextrose IX2j Atropine (X12) Lasix 40mg/4ml (XO) Atropine PEDS (M) 50% Dextrose (M) Calcium 10% (X2) Infant Sodium Bicarb 4.2% Drawer " U" inventory: T-Connector Bxt Set KY Je}ly 1 Occ Syringe (X8) Ice Syringe (X(3) Trauma Bands (X20) 60cc Syringe (X2) 5cc Syringe (M) 20cc Syringe (M) 3cc Syringe (XO) Other Items 8.0 ET tube November 2, 2009 38 2.00 2.00 15,00 2.00 $ 35.00 10.00 5.00 5.00 10.00 12.00 15.00 12.00 5.00 2.01) 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 $ 2.00 S 92 $ 37 Packet Pg. 453 8.2.d 7.5 ET tube 7.0 ET tuba 6.0 ET tube 5.5 ET tube 4.5 ET tube 4,0 ET tube 3.5 ET tube 3.0 ET tube 2.5 ET tube Tongue Depressors Thoracentesis Device: 8 fr Salern Sump Tube 12 fr Salem Sump Tube 16 it Salem Sump Tube Nebulizer to BVM Adapter Kit C Batteries Laryngoscope Bulbs, Large Laryngoscope Bulbs, Small 6 fr Suction Cath 10 fr Suction Cath 18 fr Suction Cath ET Tube Holder, ChIId ET Tube Holder, Adult Safety Glasses Bulb Type ET Tube Checker Chemical CO2 Detector Valved T Adapter BVM, Adult BVM, Child Combilube, Small Adult ET Tune Style(, Infant November 2, 2009 39 2.00 2.00 2,00 2.❑0 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 &00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 5.00 5.00 15.00 2,00 10.00 2.00 10.00 10.00 60.00 2.00 Packet Pg. 454 8.2.d 4,0 mm Tracheal Tube Exchanger 2.00 2.0 mm Tracheal Tube Exchanger 2.00 Eschmann Catheter 2.00 Lighted ET Tube Stylet 10.00 Laryngoscope Roll 100.00 Larayngosmpe Handle, Large 15.OQ Larayngoscope Handle, Small 1SrOD 4.0 Mac Blade 15.00 3.5 Mac Blade 15.00 3.0 Mac Blade 15.00 2.0 Mac Blade 15.00 1,0 Mac Blade 15,00 4.0 Miller Blade 15.00 3.0 Miller Blade 15.00 2.0 Miller Blades 15.00 1.0 Miller Blade 15.00 0 Miller Blade 15.00 Lidocalne Jolly 2% 2,00 #11 Scalpel 2.00 Tracheal Hoak 10.00 Tracheal RetraClor9 10.00 C Batteries 2.40 $ 482 $ 12,585 Aid Units 16, 17, And 20 Common On -Board Equipment Aid Unit Left Forward Compartment Main 02 Clarnshell Stair Chair Cardboard Sprints November 2, 2009 40 COST 4Q0.00 750.00 16.00 Packet Pg. 455 8.2.d Splints KEb Hare Traction Splint Pedi Traction Splint Pedi Backboard Evac-U-Splints MAST Pants Child MAST Pants Left Center Compartment Bait Cutter Tool Box Jumper Cables Scene Tape Hydrant Wrench Hack Saw Folding Shovel Flat Head Axe Utility Rope Bag Traffic Cones (4) Flares Halligan 'Coal Left Rear Compartment SCBA (2) Spare Mask Rear Compartment Backboards (3) d (2) Backboard Kits (2) d Kit$ (2) 100.00 150.00 100.00 100.00 600.00 $ 2,215 $ 125.00 250.00 20.00 10.00 70.00 5.00 15.00 100.00 25.00 100,00 20.00 150.00 $ 890 $ 10.00 90,00 Right Rear Compartment 2A10BC Cary Chemical Extinguisher _ _ 1100,00 $ Right Forward Compartment Defibrillator Suction Unit Aid Kit 02 Kit Box Light (2) Infant/Pediatric BVM Kit Compartment 3 Glucose ❑rink Straws November 2, 2009 41 100 100 $ 500.00 150.00 75.00 200.00 50.00 $ 975 $ 5.00 r c E a� a� Q 76 0 0 a� c v �L L ii m t 0 a� c �L c� a� 2 0 a N 41 c m E �a a 0 0 N R C T O 2 U M c 0 U r c am E t 0 0 a Packet Pg. 456 8.2.d Convenience Bags Bazars straws Sterile Water Saline Bag Emesis Tray ❑efibriltator Patches Blanket Compartment 4 02 Tubing Nasal Cannulas Pediatric 02 02 Masks Masks Adult 02 Masks Masks Suction Canister {2) Canister Lid (2) Suction Tips Compartment 5 Ice Packs 8" x 10" Surgipads Plastic Wrap Triangular Bandage Multi -Trauma Dressings 7 112" x 0" pressings Sam Splints Burn Sheets Petroleum Gauze Eye Pads 4X4 {Cling Compartment B Shears Band Aids Extra Straps Head Beds (3) C-Collars (2) Thermometer Tape Ammonia Inhalants Swabs Site Sticks November 2, 2009 42 5.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 2.00 2.00 5.00 5.00 540 5.00 10.00 5,00 5.00 $ 5.00 5.00 2.00 5,00 5.00 5.00 10.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 $ 5.00 2,00 15.00 t 2,00 20.00 2.00 2,00 2.00 2.00 2.00 $ 23 40 $ 40 $ 64 r c O E a� L Q O as c r U �L N m L ii m t c O tM c �L :i O d N r` 41 c d E t ca Q 0 0 N c T L O v M c O U c am E V 2 a Packet Pg. 457 8.2.d Driver seat: Helmet Shield $ 10.0Q Door Openers (2) nor (1) Traffic Vests (4) 40,00 Latex Gloves 5.00 Portable Radio Radio - Report Can 45.00 Key Box: 15MO Edmonds, MLT, - Lynnwood, SCFD 1. Passports: Red, White 5.00 Smoke Detectors 10A0 Polaroid Camera 10,00 Note Pad 1.00 Officers Helmet Shield 10.00 Binoculars 100.00 IC Kit 100,D0 Accident Forms - Damage Assessmenl Kit 5.00 Reference materials: Edmonds grid Grid book Book $ Greater SWSC Grid Book MLT Map Book Thomas Brothers Map Map Book Brothers Book 10.00 EINHS Laminated Floor Plan County Resource Plan Hospital Map Book B00 MHz Portable - Edmonds Apartment Book - DOT Hazmat mat Guide Guide Shoreline Map Map MCI Bag 5D.00 Triage Tags 15,00 Towels - Pillows Blankets Sheets Limb Restraints 400 Limb Restraints 40.00 Fluid Shields 5.00 Infection Control Kits (5) 50.00 November 2, 2009 43 $ 355 Packet Pg. 458 8.2.d Exposure gown~ Gowns TB Masks Compartment 7 OB Kits Disposable Blankets Compartment 8 Adult BVM Airways (2) 2) Pediatric 8VM Infant BVM Compartment 9 Drinking Water Water Cisfnfoctant Spray Bio-Bags Teddy Bears Counter Tape Sharp 'Trap Spare ALS Supplies Shears BP Cuff Stethoscope Sarii Wipes Fling Cutter Latex Gloves Tissue Wall Mount Thermometer J U Mpseat Car Seat Bench Seat; PFO (3) Second Drawec ALS Equipment November 2, 2009 44 10.Q0 5�Q0_ $ 225 $ 15.00 5.00 $ 20 $ 10.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 $ 25 $ 1.00 5.00 2.00 $ 0 $ 1,UQ 1.00 100.00 6.00 5,00 35.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 2.00 300.00 $ 464 $ 10©.00 $ 100 $ 240.00 $ 240 $ 100.00 $ 100 a Packet Pg. 459 8.2.d Third Drawer, Spare 02 Bottles (4) Regulators (2) Rear Batch (Drivers side): Softseal Helmet Shields November 2, 2049 45 $ 200.00 $ 200 $ 36.00 — — 10.00 A $ 45 $ 6,239 Packet Pg. 460 8.2.d EXHIBIT J NON -BUILT-IN, NON -FIXED STATION FURNISHINGS 1.. The District shall pay a one-time, lump sum purchase price for fire station furnishings that are not built-in or fixed, and the consumable and disposable E supplies listed below. L 2. The lump sure purchase price was determined by applying a 15-year a depreciation schedule t0 the estimated purchase price of furnishings and c ensembles, and the acquisition price for consumables and disposable supplies. c TABLE J1 STATION Station 16 TOTAL. COST DEPRECIATION _ _ $8544.60 TOTAL LESS DEPRECIATION $21,743.75 $13,199.15 Station 17 $23,186.00 $14,966.33 $8,219.67 20 $24,300.00 $15,382A6 $8,918.60 _Station TOTAL- - -$69,229,75 _ $38,892.93 $30,336.82 November 2, 2009 Packet Pg. 461 8.2.d Furnishin s- Non -Fixed Asset List COST TOTAL DEPRECIATION FINAL COST Station 16 Apparatus Bav: 2 Large Dust Pans 5 025 S 0150 S S 0.50 36 D Cell Batteries S 0,25 5 9.00 S S 9.00 150 AA Cell Batteries 5 0.25 5 37.50 S S 37.50 100 AAA Batteries 8 0.25 5 25.00 S - S 25.00 9 9 Volt Batteries 5 025 S 2.25 S S 225 4 Smoke Detectors 5 10 Co S 4000 S (16.00) S 24.00 1 Bull Horn S 15.00 S 15.00 S (6.00) S 9.00 2 Snow Shovels S ism S 30.00 S (12.00) 5 18.00 1 Bucket and Mop Ringer S 75.00 5 75.00 S (30A0) S 45.00 1 45 gal. Capacity Flammable S 25000 5 250.00 5 (100.00) $ 150.00 Liquid Cabinet with: 5 - 5 - S - 1 Auto Products - Oil, Antifreeze, Arrnaral, W S 5900 S 50.00 S (20.00) S 30.00 2 Float Squeegees 5 20,00 S 40A0 S (16.00) S 2400 4 Wash Brushes 5 10 00 S 40A0 S ('6 00) 5 24,00 4 Mop Buckets S 5.00 S 20,00 S (8.00) S i2.00 1 5 gal. Car Soap 5 10.00 S 10,00 S (4.00) 5 6.00 4 Wash Mitts S 2.00 S 8= S 5 8.00 1 mmop $ 10.00 S 11000 S S 10,00 1 12' Step Ladder 5 25.00 5 25,00 5 (10,00) $ 15.00 12 Area Rugs 5 10.00 S 12000 S (48.00) 5 72.00 1 Railing SCBA Rack $ 50.00 S 5U 00 S (20A0) 5 30.00 1 5 Storage Cabinet 5 10000 S 100,00 S (40.00) 5 60.00 2 Plastic Sate Horses S 15.00 S 30,00 S (12.00) S 18.00 1 8" Bench Grinder S 25.00 S 25.00 5 (10.00) S 15.00 1 Roller Toni Chest, Various Tools S 200.00 S 200,00 S (80.00) 5 120.00 2 5 Shelf Storage Shelf S 100.00 S 200.00 5 (80A0) $ 12000 i Battery Charger S SOAO S 50.00 S (20A0) S 30.00 1 Skill Saw S 20.00 S 2000. 5 (8.00) S 12.00 5 Brooms $ 10.00 S 50.00 S t24.00) S 30.00 1 Step Ladder 5 2500 S 25,00 5 (10,00) S 15.00 1 2' Extension Ladder S 25.00 S 25.00 S (10.00) S 1500 1 16 gal Shop Vacuum S 25.00 5 25.00 S (10.00) 5 15.00 1 Moblie Water Vao with Attachments 5 25.00 5 25,00 S i.10.00) 5 1500 Lmna Quarters: 5 Rechner5 5 75000 S 3,750.00 5 (1,500.03) 5 2,25000 5 TaVe Chairs 5 45 00 5 225A0 5 (90.00) S 13500 1 Television, W' LCD, New 5 1,150.00 5 1,150.00 S (460.00) S 69000 1 Book Case S 100.00 5 imoo S (40.09) S 6000 Page 1 Exhibit J Inventory, 11-2-09.xIs Packet Pg. 462 8.2.d I VCR S 50.40 S 50.00 S (20.00) 5 30.00 1 Small Table S 25.00 S 25.00 5 (10.UO) S 15.00 1 Lamp S 10 CO S 1000 S (4.00) S 6.00 Conference Room- 4 File Cabinets S 100.00 S 440.00 S (160.00) S 240.00 4 Table Chairs S 25.00 S 100,00 S (40.QO) S BOZO 2 Desk Chairs S 7500 5 150.00 5 (60.00) 5 9000 1 Pencil Sharpener S 5.00 S 6.00 S (2,00) S 3.00 1 Desk Lamp S 500 S 5.00 S (2,00) S 3,00 2 Calculators S 5.00 S 10.00 5 (4,00) $ 6.00 2 Clocks S 5.00 $ 10.00 5 (4.00) S 6.00 1 Paper Shredder S 10,00 S 10.00 S (4.00) S 8.00 1 Paper Cutter S 5.00 S 600 S (2.00) S 3.00 1 Label Maker 5 5.00 S 5.00 S (2.00) 5 3.00 1 Head Phone $ 2.00 5 2.00 S (0.00) 5 1.20 LT t7fce: i Desk Chair 5 75.00 S 75.00 S (30,00) $ 45.00 1 Tabie Chair 5 45.00 5 4500 5 (18.00) 3 27,00 1 Shredder $ 10,04 S 10,00 S (4 00) S 6,00 1 Surge Protector S 500 S 5Z0 S (2,001 S 3.00 4 Assorted File Sorters S 200 S 800 S S 8.00 1 Head Phone 5 200 5 2.00 S (0.80) S 120 5 Ink: Cartridges 5 2.00 S 10.00 $ S 10.00 Front Lobby- 2 Table Chairs 5 45.00 $ 90.00 $ (30,00) S 54.00 1 Chair Tabie S 50.00 S S000 $ (20,OG) S 30.00 BC Office: 1 Shredder S 10.00 S 10.00 S (4.00) S 6.00 1 File Cabinet S 100.00 S 100.00 S (40,00) S 60.00 2 Surge Protectors S 5.00 S 10,00 S (4.00) 5 COO Con ! nterr 3 Boxes Printer Paper 5 25 Co 5 75.00 5 S 75.00 Storage Room: 2 Cases Paper Towels S 12.00 S 2400 S S 24.00 3 Cases Toilet Paper S 12 DO $ 36.00 5 - S 36.00 1 Case Brown Paper Roll 5 12.00 S 12.00 5 - S t2,.00 1 Case Mulii-r-od Paper Towels 5 10.00 S 10,00 S - 5 10.00 i Box 20 Papef Towel Rolls 5 1000 S 10.00 5 5 10.00 1 Assorted Light Bulbs S 5.00 S 5.00 5 - 5 5.00 1 Case 50w Light Bulbs S 5,00 S 5.00 5 - S 5.00 Assorted Halogen Bulbs 5 S - 5 - Page 2 Exhibit J Inventory, 11-2-09-id5 Packet Pg. 463 8.2.d 5 Wash Mitts S 200 S 10.0a 5 - S 10-00 5 Mop Heads $ 300 $ 15.00 5 S 15.00 3 Borax Soap 5 2.00 5 5.00 S S 8.00 2 Laundry Soap 5 2.00 S 4.00 S $ 4.00 1 5 gal. Dish Soap 5 -5 00 5 5.00 S - $ 5.00 1 Car Wash Soap S 1000 5 10.00 5 S iom 1 Case Printer Paper S 25.00 S 2&00 S - S 25.00 4 Mattress Covers S 5 CO 5 20.00 5 3 20.00 4 Large Storage Shelves S 25 CO S 100.00 S (40.06) S 60,130 5 - 2 Set Washerl Dryer 5 750.00 S 1.500.00 5 (600.00) S 900.00 Weight Room I Physical Fitness Enuivment S 1 Radio 5 25.00 S 25.00 S (10,00) 5 15.00 1 Book shelf S 25.00 S 25.00 S (10.00) S 15.00 35 2 of Each 5-100 ibs S 10.0o S 350.00 S (140.00) 5 210_00 1 Tat! Trash Can 5 200 S 2.00 S to -go) S 1.20 8 45 lb Plates S 10.00 S 80.00 S (32,00) S 48.Q0 12 5 ib Plates $ 5.00 $ 60.00 S (24.00} $ 36Z0 6 2.5 #b Plates 5 2.50 5 15.00 S (6.00) S 900 8 35 lb Plates S 25.00 S 200.00 S (80,00) S 120.03 76 10 lb Plates a 10,00 S 160.00 5 (64,00) S 96.00 2 it701b Plates S 50 06 S 100.00 5 (40.00) S 60.00 1 Sled Leg Press S 800A0 S 900,DD $ (360.00) 5 540.00 1 Sench Press Set 5 65000 5 650.00 5 (260,00) S 390.00 1 Preachers Bench $ 40000 5 40000 5 (160.00) 5 240.00 1 Upright Bench S 400.00 5 400.00 S (160-00 5 240.00 1 Fiat Bench S 250.00 5 250.00 $ (100.00) S 150.00 1 Adjustable Beach S 400.00 S 400 00 S (160.00) S 240-00 1 Para Body Frame Set S 800.00 5 800AO 5 (320.00) 5 4aO.00 5 Assorted Handles 5 25 00 5 125.00 S (50.00) $ 75.00 2 Rings S 5.00 $ 10.00 S (4.00) S 6.00 1 Jump Rope S 2.00 S 200 S (0.501 $ 1.20 1 Half Ball S 10.00 S 1000 S (4.00) $ 6.00 2 Balar^ce Pads S S.00 5 10.00 S (4.00) 5 5.00 2 Foam Rolls S 2.00 5 4.00 5 (1.60) $ 2.40 2 Floor Mats S 500 5 10.00 S (4.00) S UO 5 Weighted Bails S 7.50 5 3750 S (15.00) $ 22.50 1 Sall Rack 5 10.00 S 10.00 5 (4 00) S 600 2 Straight Bars S 25 OD S 50.00 S (2om) S 30.00 1 Bent Bar 5 S - S - 5 - 1 Kettle Bail S 2000 S 20.00 $ (8.00) 5 12.00 Page 3 Exhibit Inver".11-2-09.xls Packet Pg. 464 8.2.d 1 Large Bail 5 5.00 S 500 $ (2.00) 5 3.00 1 Small Ball S 5.00 5 5.00 5 (2.00) 5 3.00 3 Plate Holders S 25.00 S 75.00 S (30.00) 5 45.00 1 Stair -Master S 1200,00 S 1.200A0 S (480.00) 5 720.00 1 Stationary Bike S 25000 S 250.00 5 (100.00) 5 150.00 1 Life Fitness Treadmill 5 1,200.00 S 1,200,00 S (480.00) 5 720.00 1 Scale S 100.00 S 100.00 S (40.00) S 50.00 Bed Rooms,, 6 Beds. Matresses, New S 200 00 S 1,200-00 5 (480A0) S 720A0 5 NighLS;ands S 100.00 S 500.00 5 (200A0) S 300.00 6 Desk Chairs S 75.00 $ 450-00 5 (180A0) S 270.00 6 Step Stools S 15.00 S 9000 5 (36.00) S 54.00 9 Lamps S 10.00 S 90.00 S (36.00) S %-00 7 Alarm Clocks S 5.00 S 35.00 5 (14.00) S 21.00 6 Small "trash Cans S 2.00 S 1200 S (4.80) 5 7.20 KitCRert: 3 Stools S 15.00 S 45.00 5 (18.00) S 27.00 6 Dining Chairs S 45.00 S 270.00 S (108.03) S 162.00 1 Dining Tattle 5 100,00 S 100 Ott S {40.00) S 60.00 1 Coffee Maker S I00.00 2 100.00 S (40.00) S 60.00 2 Microwaves S 100.01; S 200 Or] 5 (80.Om) S 120.00 2 Toasters S 2000 S 40.00 S (16.00) 5 24.00 1 Assorted Knives S 20,00 S ?0.00 6 (8.00) 5 12.00 1 Assorted Cooking Trays, Pots. Pans. Etc- S 5000 $ 50 00 S (20.00) S 30,00 2 35 gal Trash Carts S 10.00 S 20.00 5 (8.00) S 12.00 3 Crock Pets S 10.00 S 30.00 S (12.00) S 18.00 1 George Foreman Grill S 2500 S 25,00 S (10.00) S 15.00 1 Dyson Vacuum S 40000 S 400.00 S (160.00) S 240.00 1 Large ❑ust Map S 5.00 5 5.00 5 (2.00) S 3.00 2 Electric Woks $ 10-00 5 20.00 S (8.(10) S 12.00 4 Cutting Boards S 200 S 8.00 S (3-20) $ 4-80 4 Television Trays S 10-00 S 40.00 $ (16.00) S 24.00 Miscellane0u% $ - S 7 Trash Cans 5 2.00 $ 14,00 S (5-60) S &4() 2 Clocks 3 5.00 S 10.00 S (4.00) S 6.00 5 Fire Extinepuishefs 5 10.00 5 50.00 S (20.00) S 3000 4 6athroom Benches 5 5.00 5 20.00 S (8.00) S 12.00 14 Floor Mats S 2.00 5 28-00 S 01.20) S 16.a0 TOTAL STA 16 5 13.040.25 S 21.743.75 S [8 544-60] $ 13.195,15 page 4 EXhibif J Inventory, 11.2-09-xfs Packet Pg. 465 8.2.d Station 17 Dorm RcxrmS: 6 Mattresses S 30000 5 1.800.00 S (1,200.00) $ 600.00 6 Sox Springs S 200.00 S 1,200.00 S (500-00) 5 400_00 4 Alarm Clbck S 5.00 S 20.00 S (13.33) $ 667 6 Trash Can $ 500 S 30,00 5 (20.00) 5 10.00 1 Power Strip F_xtensicn Card $ 5.00 S 5.00 S (3,33) $ 1.67 6 Rolling Chair S 75,00 5 450.00 S (300 00) 5 15000 3 Desk tight S S. DO 5 15.00 S f 10.00) S 5.00 Laund ry Roomi 1 End Table S 50.00 S 50.00 S (33.33) S 15,67 1 Lauridn/ Basket S 5,00 5 5.00 $ (3.33) S 1.67 Mere s 8gthmm 1 Case of Sacs of Soap 5 5.00 S 5.00 S S 5.00 5 gal, of Bleach S 1,00 S 5.00 5 - It 5.00 12 Rolls Toilet Paper S 0.50 S 6.00 $ $ 6-M 3 Packs of Paper Towels S ion S 3.00 S - 5 3.00 WomerCs bathroom: 1 Shower Mat S 5.00 S 5.00 S (3,33) S 1.67 6 Rails of Toilet Paper 5 0.50 5 3,00 3 S 3.00 2 Packs Paper Towels $ 0,150 S 1.00 S S 1.00 Kltcherr/Dav Roorw 1 Kitchen Table S 20000 S 200.00 S (133,33) S 66.67 6 Chairs for Kitchen Table 5 4500 5 270.00 S (180.00) S gw)o 3 Sitting Stools 5 1000 5 30.0a S (20.00) S 1000 6 Reelirw-m S 65000 S 3,900.00 S (200.00) S 1.300,00 1 Coffee Table S 50 00 S 50.00 5 (33,33) S 16,67 2 Lamps S 5.00 Is 10.00 S (6-67) S 3,33 1 40" Television, New S 1.00000 S 1,000.00 $ (666.67) S 333.33 1 VCR, DVD Player S 50.00 S 50.00 $ (33.33) S 16.57 39 Trainmg Videos S 5.00 S 195.00 3 (130.00) 5 65.00 1 Commercial Coffee Maker 5 100.00 5 100.00 5 (56.67) S 33.33 1 Toaster S 10.00 5 10.00 S (6.67) 5 3.33 1 Toaster Oven 5 15.00 S 15A0 S (10.00) S 5.00 2 Large Trash Cans S 500 S 10.00 S (6 67 y S 3.33 Page 5 E%hibit J Inventory, 11-2-09 xIs Packet Pg. 466 8.2.d LT OfFic&Li6rary 3 File Cabinets S 100.00 5 300.00 S (200,00) S 100.00 3 Shelves S 5000 5 154. w S (100,00) S 50.00 2 Trash Cans S 5.00 S 10.00 S (6.67) 5 3.33 1 Paper Shredder S 1000 S 10.00 S (6,67) 5 3.33 1 Pencil Sharpener S 2.00 S 2.00 5 t i .33) $ 0.67 56 Binders S 300 5 168.00 S (112.00) S 58.00 i Firefighting Training Books, Library 5 400,00 5 400.00 5 (266.67) 5 133.33 Front Entry- 2 Chairs S 45.00 S 90.06 S (60 00) S 30.00 1 Table, Small S 50.00 S 50.90 S (33,32) S 16.67 1 End Table 5 25.00 S 25.00 S (168T) S 8.33 1 Blood Pressure Machine. -Stethoscope $ 5.00 S 5,00 S (3.33) 5 1.67 Weight Raarn' 1 Treadmill 5 1.200.00 5 1,200.00 5 (800m) S 400.00 1 Para Body Frame Set 5 800.00 5 800.00 S [533.33) S 206.67 1 Stair Master S 1200,00 S 1,20000 3 (800.00) 5 400 00 1 Stationary Bike S 250.00 S 257.00 5 (166.67) S 83.33 1 Detecto Scale S 100.00 S 100.00 S (66.67) 5 33,33 1 Bosu Ball Set 5 70.00 S 70.0c 5 (46.67) S 23.33 1 Floor that Se[ 5 100,00 S 100.00 $ (66.67) S 33.33 1 qb W heel S 5.00 $ Soo S (3.33) S 1.67 1 Preacher Bench S 400.00 S 400.00 S (268 67) 5 133.33 1 inrIne Bench 5 400.00 5 400.00 5 126E.67) 5 133.33 1 Bench Press 5 650.06 S 650.00 3 (633.33) S 216.67 1 Seated Rowing Machine S 200.00 S 200.00 5 (133.33) S 66.67 1 Rubber Floor Mat 5 100.00 5 100.00 5 (66.67) S 33,33 1 Fan 5 10.00 S 10,00 5 (6.67) 5 3.33 1 Weight Lilting Chair S 400.00 g 400,00 S (266.67) S 133.33 1 Dumbbeil Set 40 pc Set 5 lb to 100 Ib $ 1,000.00 S 1,ti300.00 5 (666.67) 5 333.33 1 Weight Plates 58 pc Set 2.51 h t4 1001b S 350.00 S 35000 5 (233-23) S 116.67 2 Weight Bars $ 90.00 5 180.00 5 (120.00) 3 60,00 1 Curl Bar S 75,00 S 75.00 S (50.00) 5 26.00 1 Reebok Step S 25,00 S 25.w S (16.67) S 8.33 1 Rubber Bands S 75.00 5 75.00 S (50.WW) S 25.00 1 Leg Press Machine 5 900.00 S 900.00 S (600.00) S 300.00 1 Jumping Rape 5 5.00 S 5.00 S (3 33) S 1.67 1 Medicine Ball Set 5-Piece 5 40.00 5 4000 S (26.67) S 13.33 Station Suanlies: Batteries- 20 0, 48 C. 50 9 Vo({, 100 AAA, 1 120 AA @ .25 Each 5 84.50 r 8440 S S 84_56 20 Cans Glass Cleaner S 100 c 20 (M S S 20.00 Page 6 Exhibit J Irsvenlory, 11-2-179.xis Packet Pg. 467 8.2.d 5 Surface Cleaner 2 Boxes SOS Pads 6 Simple Green 1 Case Dispenser Hand Soap 3 Scene Tape 5 Swifter Dusters 1 Case Plastic Garbage Bags 3 Car Wash Soap 3 Dish Washer Soap 5 Laundry Soap 4 1)lsinfe0ant 0eaner 10 Windshield Wash 2 Chain Saw Bar 09 2.5 Cases Toles Paper 3 Cases Paper Towels 2 Cases Paper Wipes 4 Cases Bathroom Hand Towels 9 Mop Heads 15 40 Watt Bulbs 4 Car Wash Mitts 6 Car Wash Brushes 3 Bleach 3 Dish Soap 2 Cases Zip Lock Bags 3 Boxes Urinal Blockss 2 Chlorax 2 Boxes Ear Plugs 9 Bottles Glue 3 Electric Tape 6 Masking -tape 8 Pads Floor Buffer f Garden Hose 4 WD40 3 Pints Paint Thinner 15 Car Cleaning Products Apparatus Say 1 Shop Vauum 1 Battery Charger 2 Bicycles 5 Scene Tape a Water Cases 5 1.00 S 5.00 $ S 5.00 S 250 5 S.DO S S 5.00 5 9.00 S 54.00 $ S 54.00 S 5.00 5 5.00 5 S 5 00 5 10 m S 30-00 S S 3000 5 5.00 S 25.00 S $ 25.00 S 5.00 S 5.00 5 - $ 5.00 S woo S 600 5 5 6.00 5 2.00 5 6.00 5 S 6.00 5 5.00 S 25.00 5 S 25.00 S 5.00 S 20.00 S S 20.00 S 1-00 S 10.00 S - S 10.00 $ 8.00 5 16.00 S S 16.00 5 1D.00 5 25.00 5 - S 25.00 S 1000 5 30-00 S S 30.00 S 1000 5 20.00 5 5 20.00 S 1000 5 40.00 5 $ 40.00 S 200 S 18 00 $ $ 18.00 S 100 5 15.00 S 5 1500 5 200 S 8.00 S $ 8-00 5 200 S 1200 S 5 12.00 5 100 s 3.00 $ 5 300 S 100 S 300 S S 3.00 5 5.00 5 10.00 S S 10.00 S 5.00 S 1500 S 5 15.00 5 1.00 $ 2.00 5 5 2.00 5 8,00 5 16-00 3 S 16.00 5 2.00 5 18.00 5 5 18.00 5 2.00 5 6.00 5 c &00 5 2.00 S 12.00 5 S 12 00 5 5-00 5 40.00 5 $ 40-00 S 10.00 5 10.00 S 5 10.00 $ 2 00 S 8.00 c 5 a 0o S 2.00 5 6-00 $ 5 500 $ 200 S 30.00 5 S 3000 S 45-00 5 45.00 S (30.00) S 15.00 S 7500 5 75.00 S (50 00) S 25.00 5 250 00 5 500.00 $ (333,33) 5 166.67 5 1000 5 50.00 5 - 5 MY00 5 400 S 32.00 $ (21 331 5 1067 Page 7 Exhibit J Inventtlry. 11-2-09.%1s Packet Pg. 468 8.2.d I Step Ladder 1 Rake 3 Lockers Class Room 24 Chairs 4 Tables FF Front CfSze_ 2 Shredders 1 Fax Machine 3 Rolling Chairs 1 Stereo 4.5 Boxes Printer Paper i Label Machine TOTAL S 5000 S 50.00 5 (33.33) S 1667 5 1500 S 15.00 $ (10,00) S 500 5 100.00 S 300.00 S (200.00) 5 100.00 S 4500 S 108000 5 (720.00) S 360 00 S 200,00 S 800.00 $ (533.33) 5 256.67 S 10.00 S 20.00 5 (13,33) S 667 5 7500 5 75.00 $ (50m) 5 25.00 S 5000 5 150.00 $ (100.00) 5 50 00 S 2001 5 2000. 5 (13.33) 5 6.67 5 25.00 S 112-50 $ (75,00) S 3750 S 1000 S 10.00 5 (6,67) S 333 S 13.173.50 S 23.1-56.00 S (14.956.331 S 8.218 67 Station 20 AooaraiLs 1 Creeper 5 1 measure Master 5 1 Craftsman Double Stack -foal Box, Asst. S 2 Small -fool Boxes with Toots S 1 Makita Circular Saw S 2 Battery Charger S 1 6" Bench Grinder 5 1 Fastener Box S 15 Floor Mats S f Diesel Fuel Caddy 5 1 Flammable Liquid Cabinet, Misr- FLs S 2 Mop Bucket S 1 Mop S 5 Brushes with Handles S 2 Push Brooms S 2 Squeegee 5 1 Hose Tester 5 4 Wash Mitts 5 1 Shop Vacuum 5 Trash Can S i Toilet Bevr! Brush with Holder S Storage Shed 1 Weight Bench S i Pressure Washer S T Leaf Blower S 2 Saw Noises $ 25.00 S 25.CO S (16.67) 5 833 20.00 S 20.00 $ (13.33) 5 6.57 1,000.00 S 1.Ot30.00 5 (e66.67) S 333,33 2500 S 50.00 5 (33.33) 5 16.67 4000 S 40.00 S (26.67) $ 1 &33 50.00 5 100.00 E (6&67) $ 33.33 25.00 S 25,00 5 {16.6Tj 5 633 5.00 S 5.00 S (3.33) S 167 5.00 S 75.00 5 (50.00) S 25.00 50.00 S S0.00 5 (33,33) $ 1667 250.00 S 25000 S (166.67) S 8333 75.00 S 150.00 S (100_fl0) 5 50.00 10.00 S 10.00 S (6.67) S 333 500 S 25.00 S (16.67) S 833 1000 S 20,00 S (13.33) $ 8.67 2000 5 4000 S (26.67) S 13.33 2,000,00 5 2,000,00 S (1,333.33) 5 666.67 5,00 $ 2000. S (13,33) $ 6.67 25.00 S 2500 S (16.67) S 8.33 5,00 s 5.00 S (3.33) S 1.67 2.00 5 2.00 S - S 2.00 25000 $ 250.00 S (166.67) S 83,33 50 Do S 50.00 S (33 33) 5 16,67 15.00 S 30.00 5 (2000).5 10.00 Page 6 Exhibit J Inventory, 11-2-09,xts Packet Pg. 469 8.2.d Deck and Extery 1 Table S 200,00 $ 200.00 S (133.33) 5 66.67 6 Chairs 5 45.00 5 270.00 5 (180,00) 5 90.00 1 50' Soaker Hose S 20.00 5 20_00 S (13.33) 5 5.57 1 50' Garden Hose S 10-00 5 10.00 S (6.67) 5 3.33 2 Trash Cans S 10.0o 5 20,00 S (13.33) a 6.67 1 Barbeque, Needs Replacement S - 5 S - 5 - Dorm Rooms 4 4 Persvr: Lockers :5 =00 04 $ 40000 S (266.67) S 133.33 4 NTght Stands 5 25.00 S 10000 5 (66.67) S 33.33 6 Mattresses S 100 00 S 600.00 $ (400,00) S 200.00 6 Box Springs S 50.00 S 30000 5 1200.00) S 100.00 4 Garbage Cans $ 5.40 S 20.00 5 (13 33) S 6.67 4 Chairs S 45.00 S 180.00 S (120,00) S 60.00 4 Lamps S 10 00 S 40,00 S (26.67) S 13.33 Bath_rop_ rns 4 Garbage Cans S 5 GO S Z0,00 5 (13.33) 5 6.67 1 Scale S 25.00 S 25.00 5 (16.67) S 8.33 1 Laundry Tub 5 5.G0 5 5.00 S (3.33) S 1.67 Day Room 1 Sony 40Ir LCD Teievisia. New 5 1.150,00 S 11150.00 S - S 1.15000 2 End Tables S 2500 S 50.00 S (33.33) S 16.67 4 Recliners 5 650-00 S 200.00 S (1.733.33) 5 866.67 i Lamp 5 10.00 5 10.DD 3 (6.67) 5 3.33 Kitchen i Toaster $ 10.t10 $ 10.00 S (6.67) a 3.33 2 Microwave $ 100.00 $ 200.00 S (133.33) S 66.67 1 Coffee Maker $ 100.00 S 100.00 5 (66.67) S 33.33 4 CuMpg Boards S 2.00 S 8.00 S (5.33) c 2.67 1 Trash Can S 5.00 S 5.00 S (3.33) S 1.67 1 Ice MaChine S 50.00 S 50,00 $ (33,33) S 16-67 1 Table S 100.00 6 100.00 5 (56.67) S 33.33 6 Chairs S 25.W S 150.00 S ;100.00) S 50,00 Misc. Kitchen Wares. Plates, Glasses, i Silverware, Etc, S 300.00 5 300.00 S (200.00% S 100.00 Weight Roam 1 Stationary Bike S 250.00 S 250.00 S (166.67) S B3.33 1 Ley Press S 900 00 S 940.00 $ (600,00) S 300.00 1 Tread Mill S 1,200.00 S 1,200.00 S (800.00) S 400.00 1 Berwh Press S 550.00 S 650.00 S (433.33) 5 216-67 Page 9 Exhibit J Inveraory, 11-2-09.xls Packet Pg. 470 8.2.d i Stairmaster 5 1.200.00 5 1.200 00 S (800.00) S 400,00 1 Preacher Curl Bench $ 400.00 S 400.00 5 (266,67) 5 133.33 1 Upright Seating Bench S 400-00 S 400 00 5 (266.67) 5 133.33 1 Dumbbell5,5.1001bs $ 1,00000 S ,004.00 S (666.67) S 333.33 2 dumbbell Rack 5 200,00 5 400.00 S (266.67) $ 133.33 1 Adjustable Seating Bench S 400.00 S 40000 S (266.57) S 13333 5 MediGlne Balls $ 10,00 S 50.0t1 S (33.33) S 16.67 3 Assorted Batarce Balls 5 10.00 S 3000 5 (20.00) S 1000 1 Adjustable Step S 25.00 S 2500 5 (16.67) S 8.33 25 Plates 2.5 100 Ibs 5 10.00 S 250.0❑ 5 (166.671 S 83.33 1 Para Body Frame Set 5 800,00 S S00,00 5 (533.33) 5 266,67 2 Bench Bars with Collars S 10000 5 200.00 5 (133.33) 5 66.67 1 French Curl Bar 5 50.00 5 50.00 $ (33.33) S 16.67 1 Trash Car S SM 5 $.00 S (3.33) 5 1.67 Conference Roam 1 Chair Dolly S 2500 S 25.00 £ f 16.67j S 833 26 PlasSc Chairs S 4500 5 1.260,00 5 (840.00) 5 420.00 5 Cloth Office Chairs S 75,00 S 375.00 S (25000) 5 125.00 3 Office Chairs 5 45,00 5 135.00 5 (90.(M) S 45.00 1 Teievi5icn, Old S 50.00 5 50.00 5 (33.33) 5 16.67 1 Coffee Machine 5 10000 S 100,00 S (66-67) S 3333 1 Removable Shelving System S 50.00 S 50.00 5 (33.33) S 16.67 1 Extra Bedding S 25000 S 25000 S (166.67) S 03.33 t_aurdry Room 1 Washer S 75000 S 750.00 S (500,00) 5 250,00 1 Dryer S 750.00 S 750.00 S (500.00) 5 250JD0 2 Plastic Trash Cans S 10.00 S 20.00 $ 113.33) $ 5.67 Supplies - Batteries, Light Bulbs, Laundry Detergent, Paper Towels, Wax, Deicer, Bar Oil, Smoke Alarms, Fuses, i Glue, Tape, Simple Green, Etc. $ 50.00 S 50.00 S S 5000 C f(P c e 3 Officer Chairs S 75.00 5 225.00 5 (150 00) 1 75 00 3 Trash Cans S 5.00 5 15.00 S (10.00) S 5.00 Officer Supplies - Pens. Paper, Staples, Tape, Paper Clips, Printer Cartridges, i Etc. S 25.00 S 25,00 S - 5 25.00 Map-- 1 Dyson Vacuum S 4110,00 S 400.00 S (26667) $ 133.33 3 File Cabinets $ 100.00 S 300.00 S (200.00) S 100.00 1 Bunker Gear S evv i nq Mach rle S 100.00 S 100.00 5 (66-67) $ 3333 TOTAL STA. 20 5 17.664.00 S 24.300,00 _5 (15.382.00) $ 81918,00 _ _ FINAL TOTALS 5 43,877.75 5 65,229.7S $ (38,892.93) S 30,336.32 Page 10 Exhibit.! Ihvenl4ry, 11.2-0$.xis Packet Pg. 471 8.2.e REVISED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES THIS REVISED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Restated ILA") by and between SNOHOMISH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1, a Washington municipal corporation (the "District") and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington city (the "City") is for the provision of fire and emergency medical services (EMS). WHEREAS, a consolidated Fire and EMS service, by a single vendor or through a Regional Fire Protection Service Authority (RFA), has recently gained support of most elected officials in Southwest Snohomish County; and WHEREAS, the City and District agree that a long-term agreement between the City and the District for fire and emergency medical services is beneficial to the City and District and their stakeholders; and WHEREAS, on , November 3, 2009, the City and District entered into an Interlocal Agreement (the "Agreement') for the District to provide fire and emergency medical services to the City beginning January 1, 2010; WHEREAS, such Agreement was amended pursuant to a First Amendment dated April 17, 2012 to address a fire boat ; and WHEREAS, such Agreement was amended pursuant to a Second Amendment dated 2015; and WHEREAS, the District and the City are authorized, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, to enter into Interlocal Agreements which allow the District and the City to cooperate with each other to provide high quality services to the public in the most efficient manner possible; and WHEREAS, the parties have analyzed the performance of the Agreement during the period of 2009-2010 — 2016 (the "Introductory Period") and have determined that is in their mutual interests and the interests of their respective stakeholders to revise and update the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the District and City now wish to revise and restate the Agreement as provided herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the City and District hereto agree as follows: [see new definitiens seGtien that is Gurrently leGated after signature bleoks this will be Fneved co 'i 0. _Definitions N r- r Q J_ a� a� N O N co 0 N c Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial a� E Formatted: List Paragraph, Left, t v Numbered + Level: 1 + Numberinc c� 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 0 + Alignment: Q t Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5" Packet Pg. 472 8.2.e The following definitions shall apply throughout this Agreement. a. Adjustment Year: The year in which the re-intrapet Payment ,s to be admust as new collective bargain agreement (CBA) is effective between the District and the local chapter of the IAFF. When a new CBA has retroactive effect, the Adjustment Year shall be the date to which the CBA is retroactively applied. For example, if a CBA expires on December 31, 2014 and a new CBA is executed on December 1, 2016 but made retroactive to January 1, 2015, the Adjustment Year would be 2015. b. Assigned: As used in the definitions of Unit Utilization Factor and Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor, the term "Assigned" shall describe the period of time in seconds from dispatch time to clear time, when the Unit becomes available to respond to another call. c. City: City of Edmonds. Formatted: List Paragraph, Numbe Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligi 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5" d. City Fire Stations: Fire Station 16, Fire Station 17, and Fire Station 20. Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, ui Formatted: Normal, No bullets or numbering e. Commencement Date: The date at which the performance and obligations of the City Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal and District as contained herein begin. Formatted: List Paragraph, Numbe Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligi f. Contract Payment: The annual amount that the City will pay to the district pursuant to 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5° this Agreement. q. District or-FD1: Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1. h. Edmonds Unit: An Edmonds Unit is anv Unit based at one of the Citv Fire Stations. i. Effective Date: The date this Restated ILA is executed by the City and District. i. Esperance: "Esperance" refers to the entirety of the contiguous unincorporated area that is completely surrounded by the City of Edmonds and commonly known as Esperance. Comment [C-RD1]: Limiting the Esp k. Esperance Offset: The amount of tax revenue and/or fire benefit charges to be received offset not agreed upon. by the District from Esperance area for the year in which the Contract Payment is Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal calculatedThe Esperance Offset shall not drop below $ 81,117,920 (2017 Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal Esperance AV of $F664W�- ,� 566,896,51Ztimes tax rate of 1.97 divided by 1,000) Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal Packet Pg. 473 8.2.e even if the actual tax revenue received by the District drops below that amount as a result of reductions in assessed valuation or tax rate. The Esperance Offset for any given year shall not exceed the product of $1,117,920 multiplied by the compounded percentage increase in Station Labor Costs from 2017 to the year for which the Esperance Offset is being calculated. For example, if Station Labor Cost increases 3% from 2017 to 2018 and 4% from 2018 to 2019, the 2019 cap for the Esperance Offset would be $1,197,516 and be calculated as follows: $1,117,920 x 1.03 = $1,151,458 x 1.04=§1,197,516 _'^M I. District Fire Chief: The Fire Chief of Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1. m. Firefighters: Full-time, compensated employees, captains, firefighters, emergency medical technicians, and/or paramedics. n. Insurance: The term "insurance" as used in this Agreement means either valid insurance offered and sold by a commercial insurance company or carrier approved to do business in the State of Washington by the Washington State Insurance Commissioner or valid self-insurance through a self-insurance pooling organization approved for operation in the State of Washington by the Washington State Risk Manager or any combination of valid commercial insurance and self-insurance pooling if both are approved for sale and/or operation in the State of Washington. o. Law: The term "law" refers to state and federal statutes and regulations. Unless expressly identified herein, City ordinances, codes and resolutions shall not be considered "law." Material Breach: A Material Breach means the District's failure to provide minimum staffing levels as described within this Agreement, the City's failure to timely pay the Contract Payment as described within this Agreement, or the City's or District's failure to comply with other material terms of this Agreement. q. Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor: Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor or NUUF is the method used by the parties to determine how much time Units associated with one jurisdiction are assigned to calls in another jurisdiction. Because FD1 provides service across a number of different cities and unincorporated areas, and because those various jurisdictions make payments to FD1 for those services, Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor is relevant even where an FD1 Unit is assigned to a call that is still within an area served by FD1 but outside of the normal area served by that Unit. NUUF is determined by converting the following fraction to a decimal rounded to the nearest thousandths. In this fraction, the numerator shall equal the total number of seconds that non -Edmonds Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, Bc Formatted: Normal, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, Bc Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: C No bullets or numbering ' Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No or numbering Packet Pg. 474 8.2.e Units are assigned to calls in Edmonds (not including Esperance, unless Esperance is annexed) over the previous twelve-month period. The denominator shall equal the total number of seconds that Edmonds Units are assigned to calls outside of Edmonds (Esperance shall be considered "outside of Edmonds" for the purpose of this calculation unless Esperance is annexed) over the previous twelve-month period. Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor shall be calculated separately for Lynnwood (stations 14 and 15 combined) and the non -Edmonds units within FD1, e.g., Station 19 for as long as Lynnwood and FD1 are not part of the same Regional Fire Authority. NUUF shall also be calculated separately for Woodway and Shoreline. Unlike the Unit Utilization Factor, the NUUF need only be calculated on an annual basis after the completion of each calendar year. NUUF shall be considered balanced if the NUUF falls somewhere between 0.900 and 1.100. For example, if Lynnwood's Units are assigned to calls in Edmonds that total 1,000,000 seconds during a calendar year, and Edmonds Units are assigned to calls in Lynnwood that total 1,095,000 seconds during a calendar year, the NUUF for that year would equal 0.913 and would be considered in balance. If, on the other hand, the numerator were to remain the same, but the Edmonds Units are assigned to calls in Lynnwood that total 880,000 seconds, the NUUF for that year would equal 1.136 and would be considered out of balance. total seconds that non -Edmonds Units are assigned to calls in Edmonds over 12 months NUUF = total seconds that Edmonds Units are assigned to calls outside of Edmonds over 12 months Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: C bullets or numbering Formatted: Font: 9 pt Formatted: Normal, Indent: First lii 0.5", No bullets or numbering Formatted: Normal, No bullets or lnumbering a-r. Non -Edmonds Unit: A Non -Edmonds Unit is any Unit stationed at any station other than Formatted: Font: 9 pt the City Fire Stations. Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 9 Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No or numbering s. Out of Balance Transport Fees: Out of Balance Transport Fees (OBTF) represents the amount of transport fees that are retained by the District for future distribution pursuant to a twenty-four (24) month review of the Transport Balance Factor. OBTF is calculated by converting the following fraction to a decimal rounded to the nearest thousandths and multiplying that decimal by the amount of transport fees that were collected by the District for the applicable jurisdiction (e.g. Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace) during the six- month period from which the applicable transport data originates. In this fraction, the numerator shall equal the absolute difference between the numerator and the denominator in the TBF fraction. In this fraction, the denominator shall equal the sum of the numerator and the denominator in the TBF fraction. Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: C bullets or numbering Packet Pg. 475 8.2.e absolute value of difference between the numerator and the denominator in the TBF fraction OBTF = sum of the numerator and the denominator in the TBF fraction '.: Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial t. Transport Balance Factor: Transport Balance Factor (TBF) is the method used by the Formatted: Normal, No bullets or parties to determine how frequently Units associated with one jurisdiction transport numbering patients resulting from calls in another jurisdiction. Because FD1 provides service across a number of different cities and unincorporated areas, and because Edmonds is entitled to receive transport fee revenue for all transports resulting from calls in Edmonds regardless of whether the transport is performed by an Edmonds Unit or a non -Edmonds Unit, Transport Balance Factor is relevant to whether transport fees are being distributed in an equitable manner. TBF is determined by converting the following fraction to a decimal rounded to the nearest thousandths. In this fraction, the numerator shall equal the total number of transports that non -Edmonds Units provide from calls in Edmonds (not including Esperance, unless Esperance is annexed) over the previous six-month period. When an Edmonds Unit and a non -Edmonds Unit both respond to a call in Edmonds and the non -Edmonds Unit transports the patient, that call may not be counted in the numerator, even if the Edmonds Unit responded with a non -transport vehicle. The denominator shall equal the total number of transports that Edmonds Units provide from calls outside of Edmonds (Esperance shall be considered `outside of Edmonds" for the purpose of this calculation unless Esperance is annexed) over the previous six-month period. TBF shall be considered balanced if the TBF falls somewhere between 0.900 and 1.100. While TBF is intended to be analyzed by looking back over the previous six months, a special TBF shall be calculated that looks at TBF on a quarterly basis and adjusts the calculation method accordingly. The quarterly analysis shall be performed after the first quarter of 2017 and is intended to keep data from the 2016 service delivery model from contaminating the 2017 data.- ' Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial number of transports that non -Edmonds Units provide from calls in Edmonds over 6 months Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: C No bullets or numbering TBF = Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5" number of transports that Edmonds Units provide from calls outside of Edmonds over 6 months Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.5" u. Unit: A Unit is a arouo of Firefiahters that work toaether and are based at the same station. Where a station is staffed by three firefighters at any one time, that station shall be considered a Unit. Where a station is staffed by five or more firefighters at any one time, without counting the Battalion Chief or Medical Services Officer, that station shall be deemed to have two Units and the District shall clearly allocate the Firefighters at that Packet Pg. 476 8.2.e station in such a manner that the two Units at that station can be clearly distinguished for the purposes of determining the Unit Utilization Factor for each Unit. w. Unit Utilization Factor: Unit Utilization Factor or UUF is the method used by the parties to determine how busy a particular Unit is. Unit Utilization Factor shall be calculated as soon as possible after the end of each quarter, looking back over the previous twelve- month period. Unit Utilization Factor is determined by converting the following fraction to a decimal rounded to the nearest thousandths. In this fraction, the numerator shall equal the total number of seconds a Unit is Assigned to all calls over the previous twelve- month period. The denominator shall always be 31,536,000 (the number of seconds in a twelve-month period). Because this contract initially contemplates exactly one Unit at each station, with each station having multiple apparatus types, the total number of seconds a Unit is assigned to all calls shall be the total for all apparatus types used by that Unit. The activity of the Battalion Chief and Medical Services Officer shall not be counted in the numerator for any unit. For example, if, over the previous twelve-month period, Engine 20 was assigned to calls totaling 72,089 seconds, and Ladder 20 was assigned to calls totaling 229,320 seconds, and Medic 20 was assigned to calls totaling 4,008,640 seconds, then the numerator for Unit 20's Unit Utilization Factor would be 4,310,049 seconds. The Unit Utilization Factor for Unit 20 would then equal 0.137 (4,310,049 / 31,536,000 = 0.1366 which rounds to 0.137). While UUF is intended to be analyzed by looking back over the previous twelve months, during the each of the first three quarters of 2017, a special UUF shall be calculated that looks at UUF on a quarterly basis and adjusts the calculation method accordingly. The quarterly analysis during 2017 is intended to keep data from the 2016 service delivery model from contaminating the 2017 data. .number of seconds a Unit is Assigned to all calls over the previous twelve-month period x. Wind -Up Period: The twelve (12) months immediately following formal notification of a Material Breach by either party except as defined in Section 10.2. Formatted: Font: 9 pt Formatted: Indent: First line: 0.5" Formatted: Font: 9 pt Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: C bullets or numbering Formatted: Font: (Default) Anal, 9 N r Q J_ a� N N O N to O N c a� E t c� Q JJa Packet Pg. 477 8.2.e SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 Services Provided. The District shall provide all services necessary for fire suppression, emergency medical service, hazardous materials response, technical rescue, and disaster response (not including an Emergency Operations Center, which is provided by the City at the time of this Agreement) to a service area covering the corporate limits of the City of Edmonds... In addition, the District shall provide support services including, but not limited to, fire marshal, fire prevention and life safety, public education, public information, and fleet maintenance, payroll and finances, human resources, and legal and risk management pertaining to the operations and delivery of the District's services. 1.2 Training, Education, and Career Development. The District will provide training and education to all firefighter and emergency medical service personnel in accordance with State, County and local requirements. Furthermore, the District will offer professional development and educational and training opportunities for unrepresented and civilian employees. 1.3 City Fire Chief. The District's Fire Chief shall be designated the City Fire Chief for purposes of statutory provisions, regulations and the Edmonds City Code. 1.4 District Fire Chief Designates Fire Marshal. The District Fire Chief shall designate an individual to serve as City Fire Marshal, and shall assign necessary personnel to support the functions and needs of the Fire Marshal as mutually agreed to and partially funded by the City (See Exhibit A), subject to the City's right to provide its own fire inspectors pursuant to Section 2.8.1, below. STANDARDS FOR SERVICES/STAFFING 2.1 Battalion Chief. A Battalion Chief shall continue to be available for response within the City twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week as during the Introductory Period. The District agrees to provide Incident Command response for all emergency incidents twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week. 2.2 Fire Station Staffing. The City Fire Stations shall each be staffed twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week with a minimum of one (1) fire captain and two (2) firefighters, at least one of whom shall be a firefighter/paramedic. Any increase in staffing above this level shall not increase the Contract Payment unless the increase occurs through an amendment of this Agreement. 2.2.1 oGGUrreR The parties shall negotiate an amendment to this Agreement upon the occurrence of any of the following Negotiation Thresholds: 2.2.1.1 When the Unit Utilization Factor "U( OF") at any one of the City Fire Stations exceeds 0.250; N r Packet Pg. 478 8.2.e 2.2.1.2 When the Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor "NUUF" is out of balance as defined in this Agreement, PROVIDED THAT this subsection shall not trigger a renegotiation any earlier than January 1, 2018. t#aatPROVIDED THAT this subsection shall not trigger a renegotiation earlier than July 1, Ttransport F#ees received fer the „t .,f ha!aR G transport „kill be temporarily retained by the District until fh�""twenty-four (24) months of transport data has been collected. At the end of twenty-four (24) months, if the BF is balanced, the entirety of the retained transport fees w Mshall be paid to the City or other party from whom it was retained; otherwise, one quarter of the etwenty-four month total of the Out of bBalance Ttransport F#ees wi4shall be eaid4eretained by and/or paid to the Distric4party that provided the out of balance transports. This twenty-four month review of the TBF shall be conducted every six months with the first review occurring in January 2.2.2 The District shall notify the City whenever any of the foregoing trknemNegotiation Thresholds results ('74cKierThreshold Notice"). Within thirty (30) days of issuance of the T4cfQwThreshold Notice, the parties shall meet to negotiate an amendment to this Agreement. Such negotiations shall include, at least the following topics: Methodologies intended to reduce the UUF substantially below 0.250 or to balance the NUUF or TBF, as applicable. Such methodologies may include, for example, changes to the staffing mix and/or levels, adding another Unit, changing fire response plans in CAD, and/or implementing other service changes; and 00 Adjusting the Contract Price to account for the increased cost of any methodologies to be employed that would increase the District's costs. The City shall have the right, in consultation with the District, to select the specific methodology or methodologies to be employed; aush-desisiGnselection of methodology shall not be subject to the Dispute Resolution procedures, but the cost impacts of such selection shall be subject to the Dispute Resolution procedures. The parties shall endeavor to execute an amendment no later than one hundred twenty (120) days following &, Gh�otiGethe Threshold Notice (the "Negotiation Deadline"). If the parties cannot agree upon an amendment to this Agreement before the Negotiation Deadline, either party may invoke the Dispute Resolution procedures in Section 18.1 and4 .`'only; provided, however, that any adjustment to the Contract Price arising out of the Dispute Resolution Procedures shall be retroactive to the Newtuat'^^ Dead ^edate that additional methodologies were initially employed. If either party fails to participate in, or comply with, the Dispute Resolution Procedures in Section 18.1 any' Gr- °.', the Formatted: Font color: Backgrounc Formatted: Font color: Backgrounc Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font color: Backgrounc Highlight Formatted: Not Highlight Formatted: Font color: Yellow Formatted: Font color: Yellow Formatted: Font color: Yellow Formatted: Font color: Yellow Formatted: Font color: Yellow Formatted: Font color: Backgrounc Packet Pg. 479 8.2.e other party reserves the right to terminate the Agreement pursuant to Section 11.2, in which case the party that refused to participate in the Dispute Resolution procedures shall bear the costs of termination that art refer^ ^ea lanotwithstanding Section 11.3. foee Dioh'o lira#+ 1964 clarify that (`ity , ltima+ely oeto +o oh000e methorinleo.. iW oAps;- af7oW y.4 thiQ nic+riW+ nFWFa+er i, i� +i +iaW limits t + to+ermiWiW 6+ of ri+.; Whece The parties shall meet within thirty (30) days of notice of such occurrence to negotiate an aeWimer+ to this gFee;eR+� The parties shall Wdeato es+ ea,=ev;sepaFtieS GaRRet agree up -An ari arnend-MeRt tG this AgFeeMeRt, the parties eRly FeGeurse ?hail bete teRnonate the AgFeeMen�+ n���tn a+a 2.3 Consecutive Shifts Prohibited in Edmonds. The District shall not allow Firefighters to start a 24-hour shift at any of the City Fire Stations if that Firefighter has just completed a 2448-hour shift at a City Fire Station or any other fire station in the District without having taken a rest day between shifts. While the City believes that Firefighters cannot perform at the high level its citizens expect if they are working 72 consecutive hours, tThis section is not intended to prohibit the District from allowing Firefighters to extend their shifts when necessary to continue working an ongoing incident that began before the shift was completed. This section is not intended to govern District operations outside of the City Fire Stations. 2.4 Review of Service Delivery Objectives. The parties acknowledge that the service delivery objectives adopted in 2006 ("Response Objectives") have never been met in their entirety, even when the City had its own fire department. During the Introductory Period, the parties contracted for a particular staffing level at the City Fire Stations. It has been recommended that the parties move toward a performance -based contract where the City pays for a particular level of service that is measured by service delivery objectives l+k��a._response time) instead of a particular number of positions. The parties would like to continue to evaluate this recommendation, but acknowledge that it would take significant additional work to implement such a change, not the least of which includes adoption of achievable performance standards. The City and the District agree to work toward adoption of a revised set of service delivery objectives in the first quarter of 2018. �Al Turnout Time. It has been SUggested by the ri+ GORSultant that T„rno„t Time at +hat,.,a� aohie„erl in 20, a. The District has adopted a standard of 2 minutes and 15 seconds on 90% of all calls. If thatFailure to meet this standard oacnnrnmvrbt be shall not be deemed a Material Breach. If this standard is not met in calendar year 2017 for City Fire Stations, the District shall provide the City, no later than December 31, 2017, with a report containing the following information: (i) a list of possible tinge-saViRgmeasures that could be implemented aleagwit#to improve Turnout Time, (ii) the estimated cost of Formatted: Font: Bold N r Q J_ M fn M W N O N V_ t0 O N Q Packet Pg. 480 8.2.e each measured and_(LiiJ estimates concerning the amount of time that could be reduced with each measure. 2.5 Reporting. The District agrees to annually report to the City in accordance with chapter 35.103 RCW. In additional to the regular quarterly report content and the content required by law, the annual report shall contain the Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor for each of the following jurisdictions: Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, and Shoreline �.Need.vay. The City acknowledges that the District may not have completely accurate data regarding the Shoreline NUUF in light of Shoreline's different dispatch system. The annual report shall contain the total number of seconds that City Fire Stations responded to calls in Woodway. The annual report shall also state the amount of transport fees that the District sought to recover from incidents occurring within the City and Esperance, respectively, and the amount of those fees that were actually recovered. If the District has data that identifies the number of seconds during which two or more Units were Assianed to different calls at the same time. it shall include that data in the annual report. 2.5.1 Quarterly Reporting. In addition, the District shall provide a quarterly report to the mayer, finaRGe direGteF and ,.ity att ~neycity clerk, no later than 30 days after the end of each quarter. The quarterly report shall contain the Unit Utilization Factor for each of the City Fire Stations, the Transport Balance Factor, as well as the turnout time, travel time, overall response time +ran F+S GORGI Ieted by Ci+„ � �..i+ „+site .,f City limito P � z.^o��. �����,--onr„*^n�^.,d Formatted: Font color: Backgrounc transports seradaetedby other-agGReiec which Fi,.iRate .;Rside the i'v. Formatted: Font color: Backgrounc aleRg with a repeFt that identifies the number ef seGOnds during WhiGh twe or mere Units w Highlight Assi, Red to diffe-FeRt ,.a -us At the a time Formatted: Font color: Backgrounc Formatted: Indent: Left: 0" 2.6 [section relocated for clarity] 2.7 Criteria -Based 9-1-1 Dispatch. It is understood and agreed by the City and District that the dispatch of Units during emergencies is determined by criteria -based dispatch protocols of the dispatch centers and Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL). Nothing herein shall require the District to respond first within the City as opposed to other areas served by the District. The City and District recognize that responses to emergencies shall be determined by the District based upon dispatch protocols, the location of available Units and the District's operational judgment, without regard to where the emergencies occur. 2.8 Level of Service Changes. During the term of this Agreement, service level changes may be mandated that are beyond the control of either party. Additionally, either party may desire to change the service level, including but not limited to, those services identified in Section 1 Scope of Services and Section 2 Standards for Services/Staffing. When a service level change is mandated by law, adopted by the Edmonds City Council as part of the City's Response Objectives under chapter 35.103 RCW respense ebjeetive-s, or is mutually agreed to by the parties, the City and the District will renegotiate the Contract Payment at the request of either party. The City acknowledges the pess.bWthat the District may be required by law to notify the IGGal ^hapter of the 10 Packet Pg. 481 8.2.e eeget+ateand bargain with the Unien the im aGt/effeGts gf Gh gbange gn the terms and gndifions of empleyment of bargaining unit n net local chapter of the IAFF any such changes. 2.8.1 The Citv reserves the riaht to remove the Fire Inspector services from this Agreement upon one year's written notice to the District, in which case the Contract Payment shall be reduced accordingly, PROVIDED THAT in no case shall such notice be provided less than 90 days prior to the beginning of a new fiscal year, AND FURTHER PROVIDED THAT the City shall consult with the District regarding a proposed removal of the Fire Inspector services at least 90 days in advance of the City providing such notice. 2.9 Response Time Questions. In the event that response times should consistently deviate from the City's to be adopted revised Reesponse Oebjectives, as they may be amended from time to time by the City, the District Fire Chief and City Mayor, or their designees, shall meet and confer to address the cause, armpotential remedies, and potential cost impacts. USE OF CITY FIRE STATIONS 3.1 Use of City Fire Stations. The City shall retain ownership of three existing City Ffire Sstations and shall make them available for use by the District pursuant to the terms set forth in Exhibit B. The parties acknowledge that none of these three fire stations are ideally located and that the City could be better -served by two ideally -located fire stations. The parties also acknowledge that the internal configuration of the City's three stations contributes to slower turnout times than could be achieved with new stations built according to current standards. In light of the above, the parties contemplate that the City may opt to replace the three current fire stations with two new fire stations for use by the District during the term of this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Agreement and Exhibit B, the provisions of Exhibit B shall control with respect to fire stations and fixtures contained therein, PROVIDED THAT Exhibit B shall be amended in the event that the City moves to a two -station service, and FURTHER PROVIDED THAT nothing in Exhibit B shall be construed to prevent the City from moving to a two -station service. 3.2-3.3 [Completed. Deleted for clarity]' ANNUAL CONTRACT AND TRANSPORT FEES PAYMENT TERMS 4.1 Annual Contract Payment. The City shall annually pay the District a sum referred to as the Contract Payment for the services provided herein. The amount of the Contract Payment shall be determined according to Exhibit C. The Contract Payment shall be paid in equal q6iartert)�-monthly installments by -the 10;h day of each monthdanuary 15, 'The Parties acknowledge that a number of actions described in the Agreement have been completed. For clarity and conciseness, those provisions are removed and replaced with the words "Completed. Deleted for clarity." lim Formatted: Superscript N r Q J_ a� rn W IY N O N co 0 N Q Packet Pg. 482 8.2.e Aril 15, july 15 and September 15. Failure to pay „"monthly installments in a timely manner shall be considered a material breach as defined in the Definitions section of this Agreement. 4.2 Contract Payment Adjustment. Each year, no later than September 1, the District shall submit to the City an invoice for the ensuing year, including any revision to the Contract Payment for the ensuing year. 4.2.1 Annual Percent Increase Based on Labor Costs. The cost of City Station Personnel identified in Exhibit C shall be adjusted pursuant to the negotiated labor agreement between the District and the local chapter of the IAFF Local ("CBA"); provided that, notwithstanding the actual terms of the CBA, the City Station Personnel cost in Exhibit C shall increase from one labor agreement to the next no more than the greater of (i) the median increase in the total cost of compensation (ie., combined cost of wages and benefits) of comparable fire agencies, (ii) the increase in the Consumer Price Index as measured by the CPI-W Seattle -Tacoma -Bremerton metropolitan area for the twelve (12) month period ending June 30, or (iii) the percentage increase in compensation awarded by an interest arbitrator. The phrase "comparable fire agencies" shall refer to a list of comparables agreed upon by the Employer and Union through the collective bargaining process or the comparables accepted by an interest arbitrator in an interest arbitration proceeding. 4.2.1.1 The parties recoqnize that the cost of the District's community paramedic program is currently covered by grants. At the time the grants expire, the City can choose to continue community paramedic program in which case Exhibit C shall be revised to add an equitable share of the cost of such community paramedics, taking into account the other jurisdictions that have opted to continue with the program. If the City declines to continue with the program, the community paramedic program will not be continued within the City limits after the grant term ends. The District shall provide notice of the expiring grant no later than 120 days prior to the expiration of funding. 4.2.2 Adjustment Date Not Met. If the labor agreement between the District and IAFF Local 1828 has not been finalized by September 1 of the ntraGt fer seFV'Ge year (the "ndjus+, eRt Year'linal year of the CBA, the District Station Personnel costs and the District Indirect Costs for the ensuing year will be adjusted open following execution of the labor agreementnew CBA wand will be retroactive to January 1 of the Adjustment Year and mild by the City within thirty i30days f execution of the labor agreement. In such instances, the District shall send the City (directed to the MayoF and FiRaRGe DiFeGtG City Clerk), no later than September 1 of each year for which a CBA has not vet been executed for the ensuring year, a range within which the Contract Payment for the ensuing year is likely to fall, which range shall be informed by the current status of negotiations between the District and IAFF Local 1828. To ensure that the District is able to provide the City at least with a reliable range for the Contract Payment, the District shall, to the extent practicable, commence negotiations with IAFF Local 1828 no later than the July 1" of the -a y year prier to the 12 N r Packet Pg. 483 8.2.e Adjustment Yeainwhich the CBA is expiring. If negotiations have nn+ sempletedcompleted new CBA has not been executed by November 1" of the year prier to the Adjustment vnarin which the CBA is expiring, the District shall provide -notify the City with a FepE)Ft c n then nto that a pFevnn+inn a Anal from being reashedof the economic issues on which the parties have not reached tentative agreement. 4.2.3 Documentation of Labor Costs. On an annual basis, the District shall provide supporting documentation ^f its laher nests for the past year sufficient to allow the City to aedit confirm that the labor costs have not increased more than the Slty Statiea Dnronnnnl nnst in Exhihit limits set forth in Section 4.2.1. In those years where a new CBA is finalized, such documentationT#Fs shall also -include comparable agency wage compensation data that the nistrint relies i etia+inn with the meal nhanter of the IAFFused by the parties or the interest arbitrator to establish new compensation levels. 4.3 -4.4 [sections relocated and renumbered for clarity] 4.5 Indirect Operating Cost Portion of Contract Payment. The District shall determine the Indirect Operating Cost portion of the Contract Payment according to the following: • Overhead shall be ten percent (10%) of the cost of the City Station Personnel cost; • Equipment maintenance and_operation, medications, supplies, which shall be ten percent (10%) of the City Station Personnel cost; • Fire Marshal allocation of fifty percent (50%) of wage and benefit cost of the position, and Fire Inspector at one -hundred percent (125%) of wage and benefit cost of the position (See Exhibit A); and • Apparatus replacement costs based upon the District Apparatus Replacement Schedule --City Rolling Stock designated as Exhibit D. The total of the City Station Personnel cost and the Indirect Costs, less the "Esperance Offset", shall constitute the Contract Payment for the ensuing year. 4.6 Annexation. The City's Urban Growth Area contains property within the boundaries of the District. Should the City seek to annex portions of the District, the District will not oppose the annexation. In the event the City annexes portions of the District, the Contract Payment shall be increased and shall be calculated by applying the then current District levy rate and emergency medical services levy rate to the annexed property plus revenue from a Fire Benefit Charge, if any, that the District would have received from the annexed area prior to annexation. The increased amount shall be added to the Contract Payment as a base for calculations in future years. 4.6.1 Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the City annexes all of the area commonly referred to as "Esperance", the District will support the annexation. The Esperance Offset attributable to the annexed area shall cease at such time as the District is no longer entitled to receive tax revenue from the annexed area, and the Contract Payment shall be adjusted effective on that date. 13 N r Packet Pg. 484 8.2.e 4.7 Significant Change in Cost of Providing Services. In the event that there is a material and significant increase or decrease in the costs of providing services under this Agreement as a result of a legislative or regulatory decision that is exempt from the dispute resolution provisions of Sections 18.1 and 18.2, then at the request of either party, the City and District shall seek to renegotiate this Agreement and the Contract Payment to fully compensate the District for actual costs incurred according to the methodology in Exhibit C. In the event that the City and District are unable to successfully renegotiate this Agreement through good faith negotiations, then the Mll r Section 18.1 of the Dispute Resolution provision of this Agreement shall apply. Nothing herein prevents either party from terminating the Agreement pursuant to Section .11.2 if the parties are unable to successfully renegotiate this Agreement. 4.8 EMS Transport Fees. The District understands and acknowledges that the City presently charges fees for basic life support and advanced life support transports for incidents occurring within the City. The District also charges such fees for incidents occurring within the District, including the Esperance area. As the EMS service provider, the District shall receive and pursue collection of all Transport Fees in accordance with District policy for transports that originate within the City limits. The District shall remit the amount G^" GtBd so received to the City, less an administration fee not to exceed the actual cost of collection, on a quarterly basis. The District shall be responsible for, and agrees to prepare and provide in a timely fashion, all necessary or requested documentation and/or reports to the City. The City retains the right to establish the amount of the transport fee that is charged within the City and the right to pursue collection of balances that remain unpaid after the District has completed its collection efforts. 4.9 Creating Unfunded Mandates. The City shall not create any unfunded mandates for increased service by the District without fully compensating the District for actual costs incurred. The Git subG ntraGt;ng f +ho Distr;,.+'ssewipe + Weedway shall FlOt be se.n,; --.pr' ,hf„ndpd r ^d,+ea^d sk ' begoverned by CITY EMPLOYEES 5.1-5.8 [Completed. Deleted for clarity]. 5.9 Former City Employees. The City shall indemnify, defend, and hold the District harmless from any and all demands, claims, or actions by former City personnel, which arise out of, or relate to, the time prior to the date that such City personnel became employees of the District, provided, however, that the indemnification shall not apply to any claims arising as a result of the District's actions under the Interlocal Agreement. ROLLING STOCK (APPARATUS AND VEHICLES) 6.1 — 6.5 [Completed. Deleted for clarity]. 14 U 3 Ll Formatted: Indent: Left: 0" N Packet Pg. 485 8.2.e 6.6 District Apparatus Replacement Schedule. The District has provided current information regarding existing and proposed Apparatus Replacement Schedule attached in Exhibit D. The District, in its sole discretion, may elect to purchase new rolling stock or otherwise assign District rolling stock for use within the City. 6.7 Public Safety Boat. Title to the City Public Safety Boat known as Marine 16 (the "Vessel") has been transferred to the District. The District's use of Marine 16 for training and emergencies as a county -wide asset is described in the First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Use of Rescue and Fire Boat. Exhibit H to the Agreement is hereby deleted. 6.7.1 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 6.7.2 The District assumes responsibility for maintenance and repairs to the Vessel. However, upon the District's request, the City agrees to provide maintenance and repair services for the Vessel in exchange for receipt from the District of the City's normal hourly shop rates for labor. 6.7.3 The Apparatus Replacement Schedule (Exhibit D to the Interlocal Agreement) is amended to include �he Vessel and/or its Outboard Motors. The amended Apparatus Replacement Schedule is attached hereto. The Contract Payment for 2012 and thereafter shall reflect the addition of the Vessel to this schedule. 6.7.4 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 6.7.5 Use of the vessel by the City of Edmonds Police Department shall continue as agreed to before this amendment. The City is solely responsible for maintaining and certifying their operators. Comment [JT2]: BRAD NEEDS TO CF WHETHER THE SCHEDULE COVERS THE - NOT SURE THERE IS A PLAN TO REPLY ANY TIME THIS BOAT IS IN USE THE ST THAT IS SENT TO THE BOAT IS OUT OF SERVICE; BC DECIDES WHICH STATION RESPONDS, USUALLY EITHER 17 OR 20 6.7.5.1 The City's use of the Vessel is at the City's risk. The City acknowledges that the District is making no representations or warranties concerning the Vessel. Further, if the City uses the Vessel without a District operator, the City agrees to be solely responsible for all damage or loss to the Vessel and its apparatus while the Comment [JT3]: confirm that this 1s Vessel is within the City's control and/or possession. hywCIA 6.7.5.2 The City agrees to release the District from any claims associated with any training provided to it. The City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the District harmless from any and all claims for bodily injury or property damage arising out of its use and operation of the Vessel. 6.7.5.3 The City specifically and expressly waives any immunity that may be granted under the Washington State Industrial Insurance Act, Chapter 51 RCW as to any claims by its employees arising from the use of the Vessel. EQUIPMENT 7.1 — 7.4 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 15 Packet Pg. 486 8.2.e 8. OVERSIGHT AND REPORTING 8.1 Agreement Administrators. The District Fire Chief and the City Mayor and/or their designees, shall act as administrators of this Agreement for purposes of RCW 39.34.030. During the term of this Agreement, the District Fire Chief shall provide the Mayor with quarterly written reports concerning the provision of services under this Agreement. The format and topics of the reports shall be as set forth in Section 2.5. The District Fire Chief shall present a joint annual report on the previous calendar year to the Edmonds City Council prior to Ap4-March 1, and at such meeting the Chief shall request, and the City Council shall schedule, the Joint Annual meeting provided for in section 8.2. 8.1.1 The parties agree to meet on a quarterly basis to address the performance of the Agreement. It is expected that these quarterly meetings will be attended by at least one City Council member, the Mayor, the City Attorney, the Finance Director, the Fire Chief and at least one Commissioner from the District. 8.2 Joint Annual Meeting. In addition to the meeting(s) referred to in Section 8.1 above, the Edmonds City Council and Board of Fire District #1 Commissioners shall have a joint annual meeting after, but within 30 days, of the annual report at a properly noticed place and time to discuss items of mutual interest related to this Agreement. 8.3 Representation on Intergovernmental Boards. The District shall represent the City on intergovernmental boards or on matters involving the provision of services under this Agreement as reasonably requested by the Mayor. The City reserves the right to represent itself in any matter in which the interests of the City and the District are not mutual or whenever any matter relates to the appropriation of or expenditure of City funds beyond the terms of this Agreement. 9. EXISTING AGREEMENTS 9.1 DEM, SNOCOM and SERS. The City currently has contractual relationships with other entities or agencies including the Department of Emergency Management (DEM)(or successor), Snohomish County Communications Center (SNOCOM) (or successor), and Snohomish County Emergency Radio System Agency (SERS) (or successor). The City shall maintain its representation and financial obligations with those entities or agencies and will act to represent itself and retain authority to negotiate on its behalf. At the discretion of the City, the District may provide representation on behalf of the City on various committees, boards, and/or commissions as requested, as appropriate, and/or as agreed to by mutual agreement of the parties. The parties will meet to address any changes to the foregoing entities w#fehthat result in a change to the City's representation or financial obligations. 9.2 Mutual and Automatic Aid. The District shall assume any of the City's remaining contractual responsibility and obligations for the provision of mutual and automatic aid. 16 N r Packet Pg. 487 8.2.e 9.3 Full Information as Basis for Relationship. The City and District agree to coordinate their individual relationships with other entities and agencies so that the services under this Agreement will be provided in an efficient and cost effective manner. The City and District agree to keep each other fully informed and advised as to any changes in their respective relationships with those entities or agencies, whether or not those changes impact the City and/or the District obligations shall be provided to the other party in writing in a timely manner that allows a reasonable opportunity to discuss proposed changes in relationships or obligations. 9=4 f&s� provision of this Agreement shall nnh, 10. TERM OF AGREEMENT 10.1 20-Year Agreement. The effective date of this Restated ILA shall be January 1, 2017. The Commencement Date of the Agreement was January 1, 2010. This Agreement shall continue in effect for a period of twenty (20) years from the Commencement Date, until December 31, 2030, unless terminated earlier as provided hereiRin section 11. After the initial twenty (20) year term, this Agreement shall automatically renew under the same terms and conditions for successive, rolling five (5) year periods unless terminated as provided in section 11 herein. 10.2 Material Breach and Wind -Up Period. In the event of a Material Breach of this Agreement, the City and District shall, unless the City and District mutually agree otherwise, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Agreement for a minimum of twelve (12) months after notice of the Material Breach (the "Wind -Up Period") provided, however, that the Wind -Up Period shall be ninety (90) days if the Material Breach involves the City's failure to make the Contract Payment, provided further, that during the Wind -Up Period, the City and District shall coordinate their efforts to prepare for the transition to other methods of providing fire and EMS service to the City. The City will be responsible for all payments required herein until the conclusion of the Wind -Up Period. 11. TERMINATION AND RETURN OF ASSETS 11.1 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 11.2 Termination — Notice. In addition to terminating this Agreement for a Material Breach, either party may terminate this Agreement by providing the other party with two (2) years written notice of its intent to terminate. 11.3 Termination Costs. fie -Except as otherwise provided herein, the costs associated with terminating this Agreement shall be borne by the party wh IeGtG t ter,,.,Oateegually between the parties, or in the event of a Material Breach, by the breaching party, provided that in the following circumstances, the cost of termination shall be apportioned as provided below. 17 N ti Packet Pg. 488 8.2.e 11.3.1 Termination Due to Change in Law or by Mutual Agreement. In the event that this Agreement is terminated due to a change in law, each party shall bear its own costs associated with the termination, or, in the event that the City and District mutually agree to terminate this Agreement, each party shall bear its own costs associated with the termination. 11.3.2 Regional Fire Protection Service Authority. In the event that the District, along with one or more fire protection jurisdictions, elects to create a Regional Fire Protection Service Authority Planning Committee ("RFA Planning Committee") as provided in RCW 52.26.030, the District agrees to notify the City of its intent and subject to approval of the other participating jurisdictions, to afford the City an opportunity to be a participant on the RFA Planning Committee. Declining the opportunity to participate in the RFA Planning Committee shall not be construed as a material breach on the part of the City as defined in the Definitions section of this Agreement. In the event that a Regional Fire Protection Service Authority (RFA) or another legally recognized means of providing fire and emergency medical services is created, inclusive of District, this Agreement will be assigned to the RFA as the District's successor -in -interest as provided by RCW 52.26. 11.3.2.1 If the City of L . eed and the District enters inte a;forms a RFA with any other agency, the parties shall confer to determine whether any efficiencies have resulted from the creation of the RFA that could warrant reconfiguring the service provided to the City. 11.4 [reserved] 11.5 [reserved] 11.6 Duty to Mitigate Costs. The City and District have an affirmative duty to mitigate their respective costs of termination, irrespective of the party who elects to terminate this Agreement and irrespective of the party who must bear the costs of termination. 11.7 Return of Assets to the Citv. Regardless of the reason for termination, the City and District agree that like assets purchased by and transferred to the District as part of this Agreement shall be purchased by the City as described below. This provision shall not apply to the formation of an RFA in which both the City and the District are participants. 11.7.1 Purchase Back Rolling Stock. All rolling stock originally sold by the City under this Agreement, or equivalent apparatus and vehicles in use by the District at the time of termination shall be purchased back using a fair and equitable valuation process taking into account commercially reasonable factors which may include depreciation, apparatus replacement contributions made by the City pursuant to Exhibit C, maintenance and repair costs, etc. the same metheds and- ,.-nd-itiens , inder Whinh the GFigiRal agreed 61POR by the parties. The PUFGhase pri made p of te- Emxhihif n In N r Packet Pg. 489 8.2.e 11.7.2 Purchase Back Equipment. All equipment sold under this Agreement or equivalent equipment in use by the District at the time of termination shall be purchased back using a fair and equitable valuation process taking into account commercially reasonable factors which may include depreciation, equipment replacement contributions made by the City pursuant to Exhibit C, maintenance and repair costs, etc. +ham san4e „rnne&s agreed 61POR by the parties. The P61FGhase PFiG8 shall F8f'GGt aR appropriate d'SG96IRt payments that the City has made pursuant to its 101,; equipment add Gin. coo eon+in„ A G abevo 11.7.3 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 11.7.4 District Employees. The District shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any and all demands, claims, or actions by District personnel, which arises out of or relate to the time that such personnel were employees of the District, PROVIDED HOWEVER, that the indemnification shall not apply to any claims arising as a result of the City's actions during the term of the Agreement. 12. DECLINE TO MERGE 12.1 City Declines to Merge. In the event that the District enters into an agreement with any other fire district or agency that is sub functionally equivalent to a merger, the City may elect to ead the terminat this Aagreement without prejudice or penalty. The terms and conditions of that termination include written notice provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.1 to the District of the intent to end the Agreement not more than ninety (90) days after receiving written notification provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.1 from the District that the District intends to merge with another entity. 12.1.1 Not a Material Breach. The City decision to terminate under 12.1 does not constitute a Material Breach of the Agreement and none of the penalties associated with a Material Breach shall apply to the City. 12.1.2 12-Month Notice. The Agreement will end not more than twelve (12) months after the City officially notifies the District of its termination , unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, and the costs of termination shall be split evenly between the parties. 12.1.3 City Exit from Agreement. If the City elects to terminate the Agreement because of an impending merger between the District and one or more other jurisdiction, the City exit will be under the terms and conditions described in Section 11.7. 13. CITY FIRE DONATION FUND 13.1 Disposition of Fire Donation Funds. 14. TOWN OF WOODWAY 19 N r- T Packet Pg. 490 8.2.e 14.1 Service to Woodway. The City may subcontract with the Town of Woodway to to -have the District provide fire and emergency medical services to the Town of Woodway but shall provide advance written notice to the District of at least twelve (12) months prior to the offer+ik ateany commencement of such service. The City's subcontracting of the District's service to Woodway shall not be considered an unfunded mandate. No change in the Contract Payment shall result from such a subcontract unless the City is requesting additional resources to serve Woodway. Any and all payments from such a subcontract with Woodway shall be paid to the City of Edmonds only. The District agrees not to compete with the City of Edmonds in such negotiations. The City of Edmonds right to subcontract constitutes the consideration for the City's agreement to as_-p� est .eiinrataen +e have Edmonds incur the entirety of what was originally intended to he additional WeGelway's-9.13% in Exhibit C initially attributable to Woodwayef-�ef the Gity Fire Stations. At the City's request, tThe District agrees to work with Shoreline Fire Department to adjust the AVL delays frr auto -aid responses into Galls to the Town of Woodway at the Gi+.; s r er+ 15. CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 15.1 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 16. CITY AND DISTRICT ARE INDEPENDENT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS 16.1 Independent Governments. The City and District recognize and agree that the City and District are independent governments. Except for the specific terms herein, nothing herein shall be construed to limit the discretion of the governing bodies of each party. Specifically and without limiting the foregoing, the District shall have the sole discretion and the obligation to determine the exact method by which the services are provided within the District and within the City unless otherwise stipulated within this Agreement. 16.2 Resource Assignments. The District shall assign the resources available to it without regarding to internal political boundaries, but rather based upon the operational judgment of the District as exercised within the limitations and obligations of Sections 2.4 through 2.8. 16.3 Debts and Obligations. Neither the City nor District, except as expressly set forth herein or as required by law, shall be liable for any debts or obligations of the other. 17. INSURANCE 17.1 Maintenance of Insurance. For the duration of this Agreement, each Party shall maintain insurance as follows: Each party shall maintain its own insurance policy insuring damage to its own fire stations, real and personal property and equipment if any, and "policy" shall be understood to include insurance pooling arrangements or compacts such as the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA). The City shall maintain an insurance policy insuring against liability for accidents occurring on City owned property. Such insurance policy shall be in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) NE N r Packet Pg. 491 8.2.e per occurrence with a deductible of not more than five -thousand dollars ($5,000.00). The District shall maintain an insurance policy insuring against liability arising out of work or operations performed by the District under this Agreement in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more than five -thousand dollars ($5,000.00). The phrases "work or operations" and "maintenance and operations" shall include the services identified in Section 1. Scope of Services, the services of the Fire Marshal and the District's Fire Chief, acting in the capacity of City Fire Chief and any obligation covered by Exhibit B, Section 9. 17.2 Claims of Former City Employees. The City has provided proof of coverage that it has maintained insurance against claims by former City Personnel for incidents and occurrences which may have occurred prior to the Commencement Date of the Interlocal Agreement, including but not limited to, injuries, employment claims, labor grievances, and other work -related claims. Such insurance was at all times in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more than five -thousand dollars ($5,000.00). The City will hold harmless the District and its insurance provider for any such claims lawsuits or accusations that occurred prior to the Commencement Date of the Interlocal Agreement. 17.3 Claims of Former District Employees. The District represents and warrants that it has maintained insurance against claims by District employees for incidents and occurrences which may have occurred during the time period prior to the Commencement Date of the Agreement, including but not limited to injuries, employment claims, labor grievances, and other work -related claims. Such insurance was at all times in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more than five -thousand dollars ($5,000.00). 17.4 Hold Harmless. To the extent each party's insurance coverage is not voided, each party agrees to defend and hold harmless the other party, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from any and all claims, costs, including reasonable attorneys' and expert witness fees, losses and judgments arising out of the negligent and intentional acts or omissions of such party's officers, officials, employees and volunteers in connection with the performance of this Agreement. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 17.5 Release from Claims. Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, and except in the event of breach of this Agreement, the District and the City do hereby forever release each other from any claims, demands, damages or causes of action related to damage to equipment or property owned by the City or District or assumed under this Agreement. It is the intent of the City and District to cover this risk with the insurance noted above. 18. DISPUTE RESOLUTION 9 4Dispute Resolution. It is the intent of the City and District to resolve all disputes between them without litigation. In the event that any dispute between the City and District canno e resolved by good faith negotiations between the City and District, then the dispute 21 T N ti Packet Pg. 492 8.2.e resolution provision of this Agreement shall apply. Excluded from these dispute resolution provisions are issues related to the legislative authority of the Edmonds City Council to make budget and appropriation decisions, decisions to contract, establish levels of service or staffing under Section 2 of this Agreement and Chapter 35.103 RCW and other policy matters that state law vests with the City Council. The above exclusions from the dispute resolution process shall not abridge the right of the District to collect the Contract Payment pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing herein shall prevent either party from terminating the Agreement pursuant to Section 11.2 prior to completion of the dispute resolution processes described below. 18.1 Mediation. it is the intent of the city and Dis+rin++n resolve all dine, tes between +how+ GORtraGt, A-r es;taablish levels A-f sepiffirue under Serutffieln -2.4 of this Ag%eMeRt and Chap `�C 9l14 RGVV PGlinv decisions of the City f o nil shall Rot be si ihion++o review by a Fried'ater, hewever, this shall Rat abridge the right ef the DiStFiGt te purs— +t nnn-ial ran+ran+ Payment as a resul+tf SUGh deGrSiGn. Tom^ Upon a request by either party to medicate a dispute, Q+., an + nin+rin+the parties shall mutually agree upon a mediator. If the City and District cannot agree upon a mediator within ten (10) business days after such request, the City and District shall submit the matter to the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service (JAMS) and request that a mediator be appointed. This requirement to mediate the dispute may only be waived by mutual written agreement before a party may proceed to litigation as provided within this Agreement. Except for unusual reasons beyond the reasonable control of either party, mediation shall be completed within ninety (90) days after the mediator is selected. Any expenses incidental to mediation, including the mediator's fee, shall be borne equally by the City and District. 18.2 Binding Arbitration. If the City and District are unsuccessful in rnnean+ia+in the inn+ran+ Payment after having n w,nleted w,o,+ia+ionresolving any dispute such to these provisions through mediation, the City and Dis+rin+ nhauparties may agree to submit the rnattertheir dispute to binding arbitration with the foronoin arhi+ra+inn n^JAMS. GE)w+ran+ esH,hlish levels of s nde-r CasHaw 7 4 of this Aaroaw,on+ and ('haw+.,. the Annual (`on+ran+ Payment as a result of s nh rlonisinn 18.2.1 The arbitration shall be conducted according to the selected arbitration service's Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures. The parties shall agree on a JAMS 22 Formatted: Indent: First line: 0" N Q J_ W rn a� N O tV tO O N C tU L U M Q Packet Pg. 493 8.2.e arbitrator with twenty (20) days from the date the matter is submitted to JAMS. In the event that the parties fail to agree on a JAMS arbitrator within such time, then JAMS shall be asked to submit the names of at least three arbitrators. Each party shall have ten (10) days after receiving the list to strike one name from that list. JAMS shall select the arbitrator from the names on the list that have not been struck by either party. The Parties may agree on another arbitrator in JAMS or another person at any time. In the event that JAMS is unable or unwilling to provide an arbitrator and the parties cannot otherwise agree, then either party may request the Snohomish County Superior Court to designate an arbitrator. 18.2.2 At this-atearbitration involving the Contract Payment, the arbitrator shall, as nearly as possible, apply the analysis used in this Agreement and supporting Exhibits to adjust the Contract Payment. The arbitrator may deviate from such analysis and use principles of fairness and equity, but should do so sparingly. 18.2.3 Unless the City and District mutually consent, the results of any binding arbitration session shall not be deemed to be precedent for any subsequent mediations or arbitrations. 18.2.4 The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon both parties, subiect only to the right of appeal as provided in RCW 7.04; provided, however, that in arriving at such decision, neither of the parties nor the arbitrator shall have the authority to alter this Agreement in whole or in part. o,-eyailinq Part _ 18.2.5 The arbitrator cannot order either party to take action contrary to law. 18.3 Litigation. '^ t"rn the c-v-crrc� �R As an alternative to binding arbitration, if either party herein finds it necessary to bring an action against the other party to enforce any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof or any instrument executed pursuant to this Agreement by reason of any breach or default hereunder or there under, the party substantially prevailing in any such action or proceeding shall be paid all coasts and attorneys' fees incurred by the other party, and in the event any judgment is secured by such prevailing party, all such costs and attorneys' fees of collection shall be included in any such judgment. Jurisdiction and venue for this Agreement lies exclusively in Snohomish County, Washington. 19. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 19.1 Noticing Procedures. All notices, demands, requests, consents and approvals which may, or are required to be given by any party to any other party hereunder, shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally, sent by faGGimileelectronic mail (provided a read receipt is obtained by the sender), sent by nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or if mailed or deposited in the United States mail, sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid to: District Secretary: City Clerk: 23 N r Packet Pg. 494 8.2.e Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1 City of Edmonds 12425 Meridian Avenue 121 51' Avenue North Everett, WA 98208 Edmonds, WA 98020 r c m Or, to such other address as the foregoing City and District hereto may from time -to -time E designate in writing and deliver in a like manner. All notices shall be deemed complete upon actual receipt or refusal to accept delivery. Facsimile transmission of any signed Q original document and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission shall be the same as delivery of an original document. 0 19.2 Other Cooperative Agreements. Nothing in the Agreement shall preclude the City and L c the District form entering into contracts for service in support of this Agreement. 19.3 Public Duty Doctrine. This Agreement shall not be construed to provide any benefits to r i any third parties. Specifically, and without limiting the foregoing, this Agreement shall N not create or be construed as creating an exception to the Public Duty Doctrine. The City and District shall cooperate in good faith and execute such documents as necessary L to effectuate the purposes and intent of this Agreement. 19.4 Entire Agreement. This entire Agreement between the City and District hereto is contained in this Restated ILA and exhibits thereto. This Restated ILA supersedes all of their previous understandings and agreements, written and oral, with respect to this transaction. This Restated ILA supersedes the Agreement except where provisions have expressly been omitted for clarity and conciseness. All exhibits referenced in the Agreement, except the revised Exhibit C hereto, shall continue to be effective. This Restated ILA may be amended only by written instrument executed by the City and District subsequent to the date hereof. N r Dated this day of 2016 Q SNOHOMISH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 J a� a� By: By: W By: By: By: 24 Attest: Packet Pg. 495 N (r CO D oo C) ao D O Q T Q m c o Cn oO o o Z o 3 0 3 Attachment: 2016-12-02 Revised ILA (1721 : Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement) CO N iD 8.2.e 26 Formatted: Underline Formatted: Underline Formatted: No underline Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, Ui Formatted: Normal, No bullets or numbering Formatted: Underline r N r J Q Packet Pg. 497 PO N M Attachment: 2016-12-02 Revised ILA (1721 : Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement) 00 N �D Attachment: 2016-12-02 Revised ILA (1721 : Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement) Attachment: 2016-12-02 Revised ILA (1721 : Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement) CO N iD Attachment: 2016-12-02 Revised ILA (1721 : Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement) 8.2.f Station Costing Model Station Personnel (FTEs) FTE Battalion Chiefs FTE Captains FTE Firefighter/Paramedics FTE Firefighters Firefighter/Paramedics-12 Hour Firefighters-12 Hour 2017 Sta 16, 17, 20 All Cross Staffed\ALS Average Wage & Benefits per FTE Position 2.424 186,248 13.746 161,593 18.000 147,936 9.492 133,343 147,936 133,343 Total Positions 41.238 FTE Factor 4.582 Station Staffingl 9.000 0 ADD: Administrative Overhead 10% Maintenance & Operations 10% Apparatus Replacement 2017 TOTAL SUPPRESSION/EMS CONTRACT COST 2017 Esperance AV 566,896,512 Esperance Est. Property Tax Revenue ADD: Additional Staff Paid Separately by the Contracting Agency Fire Chief Assistant Chief Deputy Chief Department Manager Executive Assistant Manager Professional/Specialist Admin Assistant Technicians Fire Marshal Deputy Fire Marshal (Inspector) Count 254,227 213,009 199,030 - - - - - - 0.500 203,408 1.250 169,958 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COSTS TOTAL FIRE/EMS SERVICES COST Cost of living increases based on CPI-W, not Comps Total Labor Costs per Position 451,465 2,221,260 2,662,854 1,265,692 6,601,270 660,127 660,127 310,062 8,231,587 (1,117,920) 7,113,667 101,704 212,448 314,152 7,427,818 T- N r Packet Pg. 502 8.2.g Station Costing Model Station Personnel (FTEs) FTE Battalion Chiefs FTE Captains FTE Firefighter/Paramedics FTE Firefighters Firefighter/Paramedics-12 Hour Firefighters-12 Hour ADD: Administrative Overhead Maintenance & Operations Apparatus Replacement 2017 Edmonds -Status Quo Average Wage & Total Labor Benefits per Costs per FTE Position Position 2.424 186,248 451,465 13.746 161,593 12.000 147,936 24.656 133,343 147,936 133,343 Total Positions 50.402 FTE Factor 4.582 Station Staffingl 11.000 10% 10% 2017 TOTAL SUPPRESSION/EMS CONTRACT COST 2,221,260 1,775,236 3,287,706 7,735,667 773,567 773,567 310,062 9,592,862 2017 Esperance AV 566,896,512 Esperance Est. Property Tax Revenue (1,117,920) 8,474,942 ADD: Additional Staff Paid Separately by the Contracting Agency Count Fire Chief 254,227 Assistant Chief 213,009 Deputy Chief 199,030 Department Manager - Executive Assistant Manager Professional/Specialist Admin Assistant Technicians - - Fire Marshal 0.500 203,408 101,704 Deputy Fire Marshal (Inspector) 1.250 169,958 1 212,448 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COSTS 314,152 TOTAL FIRE/EMS SERVICES COST 8,789,093 Cost of living increases based on CPI-W, not Comps Packet Pg. 503 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Adoption of the 2017 Budget & Use of Real Estate Excise Tax Funds (30 min.) Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Scott James Background/History Mayor presented his recommended 2017 Budget to Council on October 11, 2016. Staff have completed all their departmental budget presentations to Council. Councilmembers have proposed a series of amendments to the Proposed Budget. These amendments are attached below. Use of Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) Report During the 2015 legislative session, the state legislature placed significant additional restrictions on the use of REET funds for maintenance. However, local governments can continue to use REET funds for maintenance under the preexisting rules that will sunset on December 31, 2016. MRSC recommends that local governments continue to use REET funds for maintenance under the preexisting rules and prepare to transition to the new rules by December 31, 2016. When staff initially reviewed these additional restrictions, staff interpreted that the new rules regarding the timing of implementing of the Use of Real Estate Excise Tax Report would be effective with the adoption of the 2018 Budget. However, after consultation with MRSC, we found that we have to adopt this new report as part of the 2017 Budget and that the report must include: 1) Information necessary to demonstrate that the local government has, or will have, adequate funding from all sources to pay for all capital projects identified in its capital facilities plan. 2) How revenues collected under REET 1 and REET 2 have been used during the prior two-year period. 3) How revenues collected under REET 1 and REET 2 will be used for the succeeding two-year period, and 4) What percentage of funds for capital projects is attributed to REET 1 and REET 2 revenues compared to all other source of capital project funding. The Use of Real Estate Excise Tax Report is attached as Exhibit B to the 2017 Budget Ordinance. Staff Recommendation Council continue their deliberations on the Proposed 2017 Budget. The recommendation is for Council to make a motion to approve Ordinance XXXX adopting the 2017 Budget as amended and the Use of Real Extate Excise Tax Report. Narrative During tonight's Council Meeting: 1) Council can continue their deliberations on the Proposed 2017 Budget. 2) Council can choose to adopt the 2017 Budget. Attachments: Packet Pg. 504 9.1 Budget Changes for Dec 6 Meeting 2017 Recommended Budget Ordinance and Use of Tax Funds Report Packet Pg. 505 9.1.a COUNCIL'S REQUESTED BUDGET CHANGES Budget Budget Book Increase Yes Item # Page # Description (Decrease) No ,eiW010I:L\wa11 K 1 Added 11/22 Add Social Worker* 2 Added 11/22 Add Parking Enforcement Officer 3 Added 11/22 Pedestrian Safety Training 4 Added 11/22 Health District Contribution 5 Added 11/22 Increase Annual Senior Center Contribution 6 Added 11/22 1 Radar Speed Indicator Trailer 7 Added 11/22 Change Miscellaneous to Council Contingency 8 Added 11/22 Reduce Professional Services Budget From $12,000 to $6,000 9 Added 11/22 Reduce Travel Budget From $3,000 to $1,000 10 Added 11/22 Reduce Rental Budget From $10,000 to $5,000 11 Added 11/22 Reduce Misc. Budget From $13,000 to $5,000 12 Added 11/22 Pine Street Lights 13 Added 11/22 Remove Decision Package 14 New Item Add $5,000 back to Council Miscellaneous Fund 15 New Item COLA Salary Increase for the Mayor Impacts to General Fund Budget *Under discussion with the City of Lynnwood STAFFS RECOMMENDED BUDGET CHANGES $50,000 Yes $41,150 Yes $15,000 Yes $41,000 Yes $15,000 Yes $11,000 Yes $0 Yes ($6,000) Yes ($2,000) Yes ($5,000) Yes ($8,000) Yes $20,000 Yes ($8,000) Yes $5,000 ? $3,108 ? $172,258 $0 Budget Budget Book Increase Yes Item # Page # Description (Decrease) No GENERAL FUND 1 43 Increase budget for Prosecutor contract $50,000 2 New Item Initiative 1433 - Minimum Wage Increase $4,000 3 New Item Senior Center Insurance $8,700 Impacts to General Fund Budget $62,700 HOTEL/MOTEL FUND 4 95 Increase budget for Snohomish County Tourism ($200) Yes 4 95 Decrease budget for Miscellaneous $200 Yes Impacts to Fund 120 Budget $0 Packet Pg. 506 9.1.b ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2017 AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, on or before the first business day in the third month prior to the beginning of the fiscal year of 2017, the Finance Director submitted to the Mayor the estimates of revenues and expenditures for the next fiscal year as required by law; and, WHEREAS, the Mayor reviewed the estimates and made such revisions and/or additions as deemed advisable and prior to sixty days before January 1, 2017, filed the said revised preliminary budget with the City Clerk together with a budget message, as recommendation for the final budget, and WHEREAS, the City Clerk provided sufficient copies of such preliminary budget and budget message to meet the reasonable demands of taxpayers therefore and published and posted notice of filing and the availability of said preliminary budget together with the date of a public hearing for the purpose of fixing a final budget, all as required by the law, and WHEREAS, the City Council scheduled hearings on the preliminary budget for the purpose of providing information regarding estimates and programs, and WHEREAS, the City Council did meet on November 1, 2016 which was on or before the first Monday of the month next preceding the beginning of the ensuing fiscal year, for the purpose of fixing a final budget at which hearing all taxpayers were heard who appeared for or against any part of said budget, and 2017 Budget Ordinance Page 1 Packet Pg. 507 9.1.b WHEREAS, following the conclusion of said hearing the City Council made such adoptions and changes as it deemed necessary and proper, WHEREAS, the Finance Director submitted the Use of Tax Funds Report to Mayor and Council as required by RCW 82.46.015, NOW, THEREFORE; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Attached hereto and identified as Exhibit A, in summary form, are the totals of estimated revenues and appropriations for each separate fund and the aggregate totals for all such funds combined, and by this reference said Exhibit A is incorporated herein as if set forth in full and the same is hereby adopted in full. The Finance Director is authorized to update year-end fund balances in the final budget document as projected prior to printing the final budget document. Section 2. A complete copy of the final budget for 2017, as adopted, together with a copy of this adopting ordinance shall be transmitted by the City Clerk to the Division of Municipal Corporations of the Office of the State Auditor and to the Association of Washington Cities. Section 3. Attached hereto and identified as Exhibit B, Use of Tax Funds Report, and by this reference said Exhibit B is incorporated herein as if set forth in full and the same is hereby adopted in full. The Finance Director is authorized to update actual expenditures in the final report as projected prior to printing the final report document. 2017 Budget Ordinance Page 2 Packet Pg. 508 9.1.b Section 4. This ordinance is a legislative act delegated by statute to the City Council of the City of Edmonds, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect January 1, 2017. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: IM APPROVED: MAYOR, DAVID O. EARLING CITY ATTORNEY, JEFFREY TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 2017 Budget Ordinance Page 3 Packet Pg. 509 9.1.b SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of , 2016. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 2017 Budget Ordinance Page 4 Packet Pg. 510 EXHIBIT "A" 2017 BUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND Fund No. Fund Description Revenue Expenditure Difference (Rev - Exp) * 001 General Fund $ 37,753,480 $ 39,658,740 $ (1,905,260) 009 LEOFF Medical Insurance Reserve Subfund 278,630 293,460 (14,830) 011 Risk Management Reserve Subfund 6,800 - 6,800 012 Contingency Reserve Subfund 44,650 - 44,650 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,030 5,400 (370) 016 Building Maintenance Subfund 452,000 482,000 (30,000) 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 130,000 76,030 53,970 111 Street Fund 1,772,200 1,910,760 (138,560) 112 Street Construction Fund 5,933,570 5,962,970 (29,400) 117 Municipal Arts Acquisition Fund 137,200 181,880 (44,680) 118 Memorial Tree Fund 110 - 110 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund 91,200 89,700 1,500 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 24,600 26,880 (2,280) 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 1,800 2,000 (200) 123 Tourism Promotional Arts Fund 30,450 34,700 (4,250) 125 FEET 2 1,311,900 2,476,000 (1,164,100) 126 Special Capital/Parks Acquisition 1,314,400 2,180,310 (865,910) 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 50,390 51,220 (830) 129 Special Projects Fund 280 - 280 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Imp.Fund 177,820 217,020 (39,200) 132 Parks Construction Fund 2,616,940 2,935,000 (318,060) 136 Parks Trust Fund 1,070 - 1,070 137 Cemetery Maintenance Fund 22,880 - 22,880 138 Sister City Commission Fund 10,010 10,500 (490) 139 Transportation Benefit District Fund - - - 211 LID Control Fund 14,400 16,450 (2,050) 213 LID Guaranty Fund - - 231 2012 LTGO Debt Service Fund 695,830 695,830 232 2014 Debt Service Fund - - 421 Water Utility Fund 8,469,570 12,745,260 (4,275,690) 422 Water Utility Fund 4,770,970 7,495,330 (2,724,360) 423 Water Utility Fund 11,663,700 14,995,780 (3,332,080) 424 Water Utility Fund 1,988,700 1,989,720 (1,020) 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,628,910 1,873,000 (244,090) 512 Technology Rental Fund 946,040 890,430 55,610 617 Firemen's Pension Fund 66,000 72,070 (6,070) Totals $ 82,411,530 $ 97,368,440 $ (14,956,910) * Amount represents a contribution of (use of) fund balance 2017 Budget Ordinance Page 5 Packet Pg. 511 EXHIBIT B Use of Tax Funds Report Part 1: Actual Use of REET Funds collected during the prior two-year period and Actual Use of REET Funds as a Percentage of Project REET FUNDS USED FOR THE FOLLOWING STREET EXPENDITURES 2015 %of Project usin REET EstLimaima te % of Project using REET REET 2 - Fund 125 2014 Overlay Program 62,000 33% 2015 Overlay Program 700,000 92% Annual Street Preservation Program 186,000 16% Hwy 99 Lighting Phase 3 30,000 21% REET 1 - Fund 126 2014 Overlay Program 12,000 6% 220th St. SW Overlay from 76th to 84th 105,557 15% 29,025 14% ADA Curb Ramp Improvements 25,000 100% Annual Street Preservation Program 880,000 76% Citywide ADA Transition Plan 50,000 100% Citywide Protective / Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion 20,000 100% 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S 10,000 100% Minor Sidewalk Program 40,000 100% Traffic Calming Program 20,000 100% Street Maintenance 55,406 14% 2017 Budget Ordinance Page 6 Packet Pg. 512 EXHIBIT B Use of Tax Funds Report Part 1: Actual Use of REET Funds collected during the prior two-year period and Actual Use of REET Funds as a Percentage of Project REET FUNDS USED FOR THE FOLLOWING PARKS EXPENDITURES 2015 %of Project using REET EstLimaima te % of Project using REET REET 2 - Fund 125 Waterfront Redevelopment 25,000 100% Dayton Street Plaza 1,277 1 % Wayfinding Si na e Project 15,843 90% 398 4% City Spray Park 324,028 25% 52,000 28% Marina Beach 75,033 100% Edmonds Fishing Pier 1,105 0.06% Civic Center Property 108 0.01 % Frances Anderson Center Bandshell 18,127 100% 13,030 66% Marine Beach PlayToy 86 100% 100,930 100% Frances Anderson Center Bandshell 13,048 100% General Maintenance 65,296 3% 76,514 4% Edmonds Marsh Pro'ect 27,851 100% 32,651 100% 8th & Alder Pathway 1,714 18% Waterfront Restoration 25,000 100% Civic Master Plan 68,963 100% REET 1 - Fund 126 Civic Acquisition 492,180 50% Beach Acquisition Project 4,750 100% 100% Civic Center Property 7,817 100% 475,000 50% Land Ac uistion #00434208002700 8,000 100% Land Acquisition #00434206701200 & 1400 4,000 100% Land Ac uistion 1 1,669 100% Debt Service 171,533 1 164,807 2017 Budget Ordinance Page 7 Packet Pg. 513 EXHIBIT B Use of Tax Funds Report Part 2: Use of REET Funds for the succeeding two-year period and Percentage of REST Funds for capital projects Compared to all other sources of capital orolect fundin! as Identified in Citv's Capital Facilities Plan. TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS AND FUNDING SOURCES 2017 2018 Total % of Funding Hwy 99 Gateway/ Revitalization (300,000) (300,000) Fund 126 Reimbursement -for Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization 300,000 300,000 100% Hwy 99 Gateway / Revitalization $ - $ - $ - 100% 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S (30,000) (30,000) Fund 125 Reimbursement -15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S 30,000 30,000 100% 15th St. SW from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S $ - $ - $ - 100% Minor Sidewalk Program 70,000 50,000 120,000 Fund 125 Reimbursement - Minor Sidewalk Program 70,000 70,000 58% State Gas Tax and Multimodal Transportation Tax 50,000 50,000 42% Minor Sidewalk Program $ - $ - $ - 100% Edmonds Street Overpass (500,000) (500,000) (1,000,000) Fund 126 Reimbursement - Edmonds Street Overpass 150,000 150,000 15% Unsecured Grant - Edmonds Street Overpass 350,000 500,000 850,000 85% Edmonds Street Overpass $ - $ - $ - 100% PARKS PROJECTS AND FUNDING SOURCES 2017 2018 Total % of Funding Civic Center Acquisition/Development/Stadium demo 135,000 135,000 Fund 125 Reimbursement - Civic Demolition 100,000 100,000 74% RCO/Civic Demolition (Secured Grant) 35,000 35,000 26% Civic Center Acquisition/Development/Stadium demo $ - $ - $ - 100% Waterfront Redevelopment / Waterfront Walkway Completion 2,100,000 2,100,000 Fund 125 Reimbursement - Waterfront development 525,000 525,000 25% Fund 126 Reimbursement - Waterfront development 75,000 75,000 4% Park Impact Fees/Waterfront development 500,000 500,000 24% RCO Waterfront Development Sr Ctr Unsecured Grant 1,000,000 1,000,000 48% Waterfront Redevelopment / Waterfront Walkway Completion $ - $ - $ - 100% 2017 Budget Ordinance Page 8 a� 4- 0 c 0 r a 0 Q 0 N ti Packet Pg. 514 10.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Discussion on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement (45 min.) Staff Lead: Jeff Taraday Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Scott James Background/History The City of Edmonds had its own fire department for approximately 105 years when the city council voted on November 2, 2009 to enter into a long-term interlocal agreement (ILA) with Snohomish County Fire District 1 (FD1) to provide fire and emergency medical services to the city. A copy of the ILA is attached to this memo as Attachment A. FD1 began providing that service on January 1, 2010. The Woodway Issue: For the first four years of the contract (2010-2013), FD1 also provided fire and EMS service to Woodway under a contract. The ILA between FD1 and Edmonds allocated the cost responsibilities for staffing fire stations 16, 17, and 20 (the Edmonds stations) as follows: Edmonds = 77.79% FD1 (because Esperance is within FD1's taxing district) = 13.08% Woodway = 9.13% Woodway, however, was not a party to the City's contract with FD1. So, the Woodway portion of the above cost allocation might have been more of an assumption or aspiration than a reality. On January 1, 2014, Woodway stopped contracting with FD1 and began contracting with the Shoreline Fire District. Woodway's switch to Shoreline created the prospect of a long-term financial deficit for the fire district's operation of the Edmonds stations. That condition persists today, almost three years after Woodway terminated its relationship with FD1. If the present staffing levels were to be continued into 2017, Woodway's missing share of the cost of operating the Edmonds stations would be $706,266 in 2017 alone. Woodway's absence did not result in any layoffs or cost reductions. And Edmonds continued to pay 77.79% as it had originally agreed to pay. This left the fire district responsible for 22.21% of the cost of operating the Edmonds stations. On July 22, 2016, the fire district board adopted by motion a policy "to seek through negotiation of the cost associated with the operations of all contract city fire stations." The district cannot unilaterally change the 77.79% allocation of the costs to Edmonds. But we interpret the board's motion to indicate that the current arrangement is not sustainable and that the ILA would likely be terminated if the City refused to negotiate a different cost allocation. The district is willing to allocate all of the tax revenue that it collects from Esperance ($1,117,920 in 2017) to the operation of the Edmonds stations. If Edmonds takes responsibility for the remainder while also adopting the proposed service changes, Edmonds' allocation of the cost of operating the Edmonds stations would 83.06%. If Edmonds takes responsibility for the remainder but does not make any changes to the service, Edmonds' allocation of the cost of operating the Edmonds stations would be 85.55%. The Retroactive Invoice Issue: In August of 2014, having recently executed a collective bargaining agreement with the firefighters union, IAFF local 1828, the District sent the City of Edmonds a $1.67 million invoice for retroactive labor costs under the new CBA. The invoice was retroactive to January 1, Packet Pg. 515 10.1 2013. The invoice caused some controversy. And that controversy caused the City to take a close look at its ILA with FD1. The city council ultimate agreed to pay the invoice on January 27, 2015. Fitch & Associates Analysis: As part of its effort to thoroughly analyze the FD1 ILA, the City engaged Fitch & Associates to review the service provided by the District and suggest area where the City might want to make changes. Steve Knight from Fitch & Associates made a presentation to the city council on February 23, 2016. The presentation and discussion lasted for about 50 minutes. It may be worthwhile to review the video of that item in advance of the upcoming meeting. Fitch & Associates also prepared an executive summary and data report which were completed in April 2016. Those reports are attached to this agenda memo as Attachments B and C, respectively. Among various recommendations, Fitch analyzed the status quo as well as several options that the City could consider in determining whether to make changes to the status quo. Even though the City now contracts with a larger fire district for service, because the City's costs are based on the staffing levels at stations 16, 17, and 20, the alternatives really only address those stations. All positions are staffed on a 24/7 basis unless expressly noted otherwise. Status Quo Staffing 0 3 firefighters at each station; 0 2 paramedics at station 17 only; § Total paramedics on duty citywide = 2 Alternative 1 0 3 firefighters at each station; 0 2 paramedics at station 17 only - 12 hour peak shift only; § Total paramedics on duty citywide = 2 or 0, depending on time of day Alternative 2 0 3 firefighters at each station; 0 1 paramedic at each station (1 of the 3 firefighters) § Total paramedics on duty citywide = 3 Alternative 3 o 3 firefighters at two stations only 2 paramedics at one station § Total paramedics on duty citywide = 2 Terms of the Proposed ILA: The mayor has selected Alternative 2 as his proposed alternative and the proposed ILA reflects this preference. Alternative 2 has several advantages over the other alternatives including the status quo. Alternative 2 employs more paramedics than any of the other alternatives, including the status quo. It also distributes them geographically throughout the city by assigning one paramedic to each station instead of having all the paramedics operate out of station 17. This should allow at least one paramedic to respond more quickly to 911 calls by reducing travel time to the incident. Alternative 2 also saves the city a significant amount of money compared to the status quo. The 2017 cost of Alternative 2 is $7,427,818. The status quo would cost an additional $1,361,275. Key Deal Points of the ILA: In addition to the staffing mix discussed above, we have highlighted below, several deal points that we find significant about the proposed ILA. The complete ILA is set forth in Attachment D. Note that the language of the ILA is still being refined and none of these deals points should be considered approved by either party at this point. Woodway (see Section 14): Because the city is essentially being asked to absorb the 9.13% that the parties had hoped would be paid by Woodway, the district is agreeing to allow the city to subcontract the district's services to Woodway in hopes of the city being able to recoup some of that lost revenue at some point in the future. Packet Pg. 516 10.1 Negotiation Thresholds (see Section 2.2.1): It is anticipated that call volume will eventually increase to the point where it may become necessary to add service or make other changes. For that reason, the parties have agreed upon three metrics that the parties will monitor on an ongoing basis, any one of which would trigger a new round of negotiations when the metric exceeds the threshold set forth in the agreement. The metrics have been named Unit Utilization Factor (UUF); Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor (NUUF); and Transport Balance Factor (TBF). Each of these is defined in the definitions section of the ILA with a mathematical calculation. Out of Balance Transport Fees (see Section 2.2.1.3 and definitions): This provides a mechanism where a portion of the transport fees collected by the District are withheld pending subsequent reconciliation. If the number of transports cannot be brought within balance, the jurisdiction responsible for performing a disproportionate share of uncompensated transports would be entitled to receive some of the withheld transport fees. Esperance Offset (see Sections 4.5, 4.6, and definitions): The parties were not able to identify the source or methodology behind the 13.08% cost share that was allocated to FD1 for service of Esperance. Instead of continuing to use what now seems like an arbitrary percentage, the ILA contemplates simply that all the FD1 tax revenue from Esperance would be allocated to offset the cost to Edmonds of operating the Edmonds stations. City Retains Authority to Set Level of Service (see Sections 2.2.2 and 18): Language has been added to clarify that the City always retains the legislative discretion to establish the level of service for Edmonds. Turnout Time (see Section 2.4.1): The City will continue to pursue improvements in turnout time. While the District does not commit to making improvements in turnout time, it does commit to understanding what prevents it from making improvements. Retroactive Invoices (see Section 4.2.2): The City will receive timely invoices even in years for which the CBA has not yet been finalized, in which case the invoices will set forth reliable estimates of the eventual Contract Payment. This will allow the City to set money aside and plan for the forthcoming retroactive invoices. For related attachments, please see the Public Hearing on the Fire District 1 Interlocal Agreement agenda item. Staff Recommendation Hear additional presentation in response to public testimony; Open questions from the city council; Deliberation on the proposed ILA; and Direct staff as to whether any revisions to the ILA are necessary prior to city council action. Narrative <Type or insert text here> Packet Pg. 517 10.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 2017 Legislative Agenda (20 min.) Staff Lead: {Type Name of Staff Lead} Department: Community Services Preparer: Patrick Doherty Background/History The attached Final Draft of the 2017 Edmonds Legislative Agenda has been compiled over the last few months with direct input from our Olympia lobbyist, Jennifer Ziegler, Directors of every City Department, Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers. It also is informed by the legislative agendas of Snohomish County, the Economic Alliance of Snohomish County, and Snohomish County Cities. Staff Recommendation Approve the 2017 Edmonds Legislative Agenda. Narrative At the City Council meeting Jennifer Ziegler will present a summary of the 2016 accomplishments and items that remain to be taken up in 2017, an outlook to the 2017 Legislative Session, including its challenges and opportunities, as well as a summary of the items in the attached Final Draft of the 2017 Edmonds Legislative Agenda. Attachments: 2017 DRAFT Final Legislative Agenda Packet Pg. 518 10.2.a FINAL DRAFT CITY OF EDMONDS 2017 STATE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA EDMONDS PRIORITIES Move Forward HiRhwav 99 Capital Fundin The Legislature provided $10 million in the Connecting Washington Transportation Funding Package for overall improvements to the Edmonds stretch of Highway 99. The funds are provided to enhance vehicle and pedestrian safety, transit efficiency, pedestrian movement, bicycle circulation and provide aesthetic enhancements, but they are not available until 2021-2023. This year the City of Edmonds will complete a Subarea Plan, including environmental work, for the Highway 99 Corridor that will include both land use and development regulations and incentives, as well as key identified transportation enhancements. Accelerating $500,000 of the designated $10 million in Connecting Washington Funding to the 2018- 2020 biennium (available July, 2017) would enable us to start detailed design work on the identified transportation improvements in this corridor. Capital Request for Frances Anderson Center The Frances Anderson Center roof is leaking to the point where serious structural damage and impairment of the electrical systems has started to occur. Funding of $350,000 would enable us to repair the leaking roof of the Frances Anderson Center and continue to provide the recreational and cultural benefits for which this community center is known. Funding for Waterfront Crossings Alternative Upon completion in 2016 of a thorough At -Grade Crossings Alternatives Analysis and consequent identification of a preferred alternative by the Mayor and City Council, we need to move the preferred project to initial 30% design, plus environmental and permitting work in 2017. This will ready the project for major funding from federal programs. This request builds on the $500,000 provided by the Legislature in 2015. The City of Edmonds and local/regional partners intend to provide up to $300,000 in seed money to leverage a State match for 2017 of $600,000. In addition, we seek to have SR 104 added as a designated "Urban Connector" on WSDOT's Freight Project List, which will qualify that corridor for greater federal/state funding sources. Public Records Cost Recovery and Privacy Continue to support legislation to strengthen the Public Records Act in response to changing technology and burdensome, increasingly costly requests. Support legislation that helps to provide cost recovery for local agencies in the growing area of electronic records requests, and for public records clearly for commercial purposes. Additionally, clarify retention and disclosure requirements for audio and visual records. Support legislative efforts to reduce costs of Packet Pg. 519 10.2.a DRAFT 2017 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 2 of 4 retaining these records, as well as efforts to clarify retention requirements and to provide sufficient privacy protection for members of the public who appear in audio/video records. Invest in Funding to Support Services that Address Homelessness and Affordable Housin Support efforts to: • Retain and Increase the Document Recording Fee. The Homelessness Housing and Assistance Act funds services through a document recording fee. $30 of the $58 fee will sunset in 2019. Therefore, make the $30 document recording fee permanent, increase the fee, and change the funding distribution formula to be targeted more toward serving those struggling with mental health issues and chemical dependency. • Support the 1115 Medicaid Waiver for Permanent Supportive Housing. This program gives states flexibility to tailor Medicaid programs that include funding of housing services. Encourage the Legislature to allow the Health Care Authority to accept federal Medicaid 1115 funds without caps or limitations. • Fully Fund Housing Trust Fund. With up to $200 million investment into this program, up to 5,600 additional affordable housing units would be provided in Snohomish County. SUPPORT ITEMS Suoaort Edmonds Senior Center Fundin The City of Edmonds will support efforts by the Edmonds Senior Center to secure funding for the redevelopment of their important community facility on the Edmonds Waterfront, to be renamed the Edmonds Waterfront Center. Bolster Resources for Infrastructure Investment Support efforts to establish dedicated funding mechanisms for critical infrastructure programs that help cities grow and prosper, including reinvestment of Public Works Trust Fund loan repayment funds. All creative, statewide approaches and/or incentives for local infrastructure funding should also be considered. In addition, join Snohomish County officials in advocating for additional funding for projects in the Multimodal Transportation 30-year Plan that remain unfunded. Criminal Justice Trainine Support legislation to restore full funding for the Basic Law Enforcement Academy to include dedicating all revenue from the Public Safety Education Account to criminal justice training. Packet Pg. 520 10.2.a DRAFT 2017 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 3 of 4 Public Defense Costs Continue to support efforts to provide a state revenue stream for additional city public defense costs as a result of the State Supreme Court's mandated caseload rule for public defenders. Gun Safety Support efforts for legislation addressing greater gun safety regulations. Fiscal Impacts of Legislation and Rulemaking Follow the lead of AWC and other municipalities in sending a clear message to the Legislature to consider the fiscal impacts of legislation and rulemaking on local municipalities, including a check on "unfunded mandates" and "do no harm" analysis of proposed new rules or legislation. Likewise, fiscal notes accompanying legislation should include both the financial costs and benefits (currently only costs are analyzed). Property Tax Growth Support provisions that would give municipalities a local -option to permit property tax revenue to exceed the 1% limit and grow with indicators of cost growth/inflation. EMS Levy Support efforts to amend the current EMS levy limit of $0.50 per $1,000 of assessed valuation (AV) to a local option of $0.75 per $1,000. Also work to clarify that "permanent" locally approved levies remain at the voter -approved level, not reduced as Assessed Valuation rises. Washington Wildlife & Recreation Program (WWRP) Support steps to update and improved the 25-year-old WWRP program, with particular attention to local parks funding and maintenance of existing facilities. Growth Management Act Review Some legislative discussion arose last year —and will probably come up again --about doing a "big look" at the Growth Management Act and perhaps assembling some kind of commission or study to evaluate it and suggest reforms. Depending on the nature of any study, this could affect cities' interest in the environment, infrastructure, or reducing sprawl. We need to closely follow or participate in the discussion. Fiscal Sustainability for Local Governments Continue to support efforts to ensure sufficient, stable and flexible revenue for essential city services, including equitable distribution from shared revenue sources, such as liquor and marijuana taxes. Packet Pg. 521 10.2.a DRAFT 2017 Edmonds Legislative Agenda Page 4 of 4 Environmental Issues Monitor and potential support potential environmental -protection measures, including those that would enhance the Puget Sound ecosystem, address the impacts of oil trains, drought management, toxics control and clean-up, as well as measures associated with climate change, crumb rubber athletic field infill, etc. Puget Sound and Salmon Recovery Support WRIA 8, other organizations and municipalities in pursuing the following measures at the Legislature: • Salmon Recovery Funding Board - $55.3 million in general obligation bonds in the Recreation and Conservation Office budget, which funds habitat protection and restoration projects statewide. • Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration capital budget request in the Recreation and Conservation Office budget • Floodplains by Design capital budget request • Support the Lead Entity program and funding from the state general fund provided in the Recreation and Conservation Office budget. • New watershed -based funding mechanisms that recognize the link between salmon recovery, water quality, and stormwater and floodplain management. Expand Access to Opiate Overdose Prevention and Medication -Assisted Treatment Join Snohomish County, other Counties and Cities, to support efforts that: • Expand access to overdose prevention drugs (such as Naloxone) • Increase medication -assisted treatment through increased access to Suboxone and Methadone. • Support statewide drug take -back programs that honor local control. Follow/Support Other Cities', Agencies', Partners' Agendas Monitor and provide support to our partner cities, agencies and other entities in their top agenda items, where they align with our interests. Packet Pg. 522 10.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 2016 4th Quarter Budget Amendment (15 min.) Staff Lead: Scott James Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Debra Sharp Background/History Budget Ordinance 4014, 4019, 4024, 4038 and 4045 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Council forward the 4th Quarter Budget Amendment to Consent for Approval of Ordinance No. XXXX amending the 2016 Budget. Narrative There are a total of six budget amendments. There are two items that have previously been discussed by Council. They include the Bandshell at the Frances Anderson Center and the 2007 LTGO Refinance. The 2007 LTGO refinance budget amendment is needed to record the proceeds from Chase Bank and the 2007 LTGO payoff. There are four new budget amendments. Three of the amendments effect the General Fund. They include out of class pay in the clerk's office, the Edmonds waterfront access study and the downtown public restroom project. The fourth amendment is from the Tourism Promotional Arts Fund for the economic impact of the arts study. Attachments: 4th Quarter Budget Amendment Ordinance Packet Pg. 523 10.3.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4045 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund Transfers and increases in appropriations; and WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is transferred from one fund to another; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations and information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and federal funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2016 Budget; and THEREFORE, WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 4045 adopting the final budget for the fiscal year 2016 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, and F adopted herein by reference. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take I Packet Pg. 524 10.3.a effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: M. JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED: MAYOR, DAVE EARLING 2 Packet Pg. 525 10.3.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2016, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4045 AS A RESULT EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of ,2016. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 3 Packet Pg. 526 EXHIBIT "A": Budget Amendment Summary (December 2016) 10.3.a FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION 2016 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE REVENUE EXPENDITURES 2016 ENDING FUND BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 9,359,440 39,951,905 41,886,411 7,424,934 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 519,410 278,770 279,480 518,700 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 961,510 6,660 - 968,170 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 4,677,030 723,146 800,000 4,600,176 013 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD. 56,490 370 56,860 - 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 2,590 5,000 5,400 2,190 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 118,080 2,505,000 2,395,000 228,080 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 68,730 153,000 76,030 145,700 111 STREET FUND 514,450 1,802,933 1,758,430 558,953 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/I MP ROVE 9,340 8,160,017 8,173,112 (3,755) 117 MUNICIPAL ARTSACQUIS. FUND 468,470 106,508 181,380 393,598 118 MEMORIAL STREETTREE 17,920 110 - 18,030 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 153,880 82,150 149,650 86,380 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 64,480 21,390 26,880 58,990 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 15,470 5,550 3,000 18,020 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 84,570 27,530 51,500 60,600 125 PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT 1,629,530 1,108,000 2,162,840 574,690 126 SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND 2,239,010 1,348,998 3,029,908 558,100 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 265,920 46,900 44,950 267,870 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 38,390 280 - 38,670 130 CEMETERY MAI NTENANCE/I MPROV 137,260 177,260 210,370 104,150 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION 897,420 1,357,240 1,580,770 673,890 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 152,250 630 - 152,880 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUSTFD 883,730 19,880 - 903,610 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 3,780 12,010 12,500 3,290 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT - 682,500 682,500 - 211 LID FUND CONTROL 9,650 14,400 22,000 2,050 213 LID GUARANTY FUND 105,140 14,400 105,136 14,404 231 2012 LTGO DEBTSERVICE FUND - 677,380 677,380 - 232 2014 DEBTSERVICE FUND - 949,540 949,540 - 421 WATER 16,489,530 8,443,460 12,717,739 12,215,251 422 STORM 9,589,910 4,131,780 8,112,189 5,609,501 423 SEWER/TREATMENT PLANT 42,657,770 12,645,240 17,982,624 37,320,386 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 843,960 1,989,900 1,990,920 842,940 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 7,650,500 1,579,570 1,971,820 7,258,250 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 203,102 64,840 59,610 208,332 Totals 100,888,712 89,094,247 108,155,929 81,827,030 r Q Packet Pg. 527 10.3.a EXHIBIT "B": Budget Amendments by Revenue (December 2016) FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION ORD. NO. 4014 12/18/2015 ORD. NO. 4019 2/19/2016 ORD. NO. 4024 May 2016 ORD. NO. 4038 7/22/2016 ORD. NO. 4045 10/28/2016 ORD. NO. 12/2016 2016 Amended Budget 001 General Fund $ 39,266,670 $ $ 10,000 $ 3,651 $ 72,489 $ 599,095 $ 39,951,905 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 278,770 - - - - 278,770 011 Risk Management Reserve Fund 6,660 - 6,660 012 Contingency Reserve Fund 28,110 695,036 723,146 013 Multimodal Transportation I'd. - 370 370 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,000 - 5,000 016 Building Maintenance 1,680,000 325,000 500,000 2,505,000 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 153,000 - - 153,000 111 Street Fund 1,760,500 - 42,433 1,802,933 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 5,290,850 2,735,647 288,200 (154,680) - 8,160,017 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 102,410 - - 3,598 500 106,508 118 Memorial Street Tree 110 - - 110 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 82,150 82,150 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 21,390 21,390 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 5,550 5,550 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 27,530 27,530 125 ParkAcq/Improvement 1,108,000 - 1,108,000 126 Special Capital Fund 1,102,000 246,998 1,348,998 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 46,900 - 46,900 129 Special Projects Fund 280 280 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 177,260 177,260 132 Parks Construction 2,037,240 500,000 15,000 (1,200,000) 5,000 1,357,240 136 Parks Trust Fund 630 - - - 630 137 Cemetery Maintenance Trust I'd 19,880 19,880 138 Sister City Commission 12,010 12,010 139 Transportation Benefit District 682,500 682,500 211 Lid Fund Control 14,400 14,400 213 Lid Guaranty Fund 14,400 14,400 231 2012 LTGO Debt Service fund 677,380 677,380 232 2014 Debt Service Fund 949,540 - 949,540 421 Water 8,429,970 13,490 8,443,460 422 Storm 4,131,780 - 4,131,780 423 Sewer/Treatment Pla nt 12,414,120 231,120 12,645,240 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,989,900 - 1,989,900 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,579,570 1,579,570 617 1 Firemen's Pension Fund 64,840 64,840 Totals $84,161,300 1 $ 3,805,257 1 $ 313,200 1 $ (847,431) $ 773,395 1 $ 888,526 1 $ 89,094,247 r Q Packet Pg. 528 10.3.a EXHIBIT "C: Budget Amendments by Expenditure (December 2016) FUND NO. FUND DESCRIPTION ORD. NO. 4014 12/18/2015 ORD. NO. 4019 2/19/2016 ORD. NO. 4024 May 2016 ORD. NO. 4038 7/22/2016 ORD. NO. 4045 10/28/2016 ORD. NO. 12/2016 2016 Amended Budget 001 General Fund $ 39,733,780 $ 957,500 $ 237,827 $ 82,180 $ 233,519 $ 641,605 $ 41,886,411 009 Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 279,480 - - - - - 279,480 012 Contingency Reserve Fund 800,000 - 800,000 013 Multimodal Transportation I'd. - 56,860 56,860 014 Historic Preservation Gift Fund 5,400 - 5,400 016 Building Maintenance 1,754,000 421,000 220,000 2,395,000 104 Drug Enforcement Fund 76,030 - - 76,030 111 Street Fund 1,712,370 - 3,750 42,310 1,758,430 112 Combined Street Const/Improve 5,311,460 2,728,132 288,200 (154,680) - 8,173,112 117 Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 181,380 - - 181,380 120 Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 149,650 149,650 121 Employee Parking Permit Fund 26,880 26,880 122 Youth Scholarship Fund 3,000 - 3,000 123 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 31,500 - - 20,000 51,500 125 ParkAcq/Improvement 1,523,650 484,982 91,933 - - 62,275 2,162,840 126 Special Capital Fund 1,934,390 545,930 115,000 154,680 33,637 246,271 3,029,908 127 Gifts Catalog Fund 44,950 - - - - - 44,950 130 Cemetery Maintenance/Improv 210,370 - - - 210,370 132 Parks Construction 2,100,000 660,770 15,000 (1,200,000) 5,000 1,580,770 138 Sister City Commission 12,500 - - - 12,500 139 Transportation Benefit District 682,500 - 682,500 211 Lid Fund Control 14,400 7,600 22,000 213 Lid Guaranty Fund - 105,136 105,136 231 2012LTGO Debt Service Fund 677,380 - 677,380 232 2014 Debt Service Fund 949,540 949,540 421 Water 12,323,960 389,797 3,750 - - 232 12,717,739 422 Storm 6,612,170 997,530 3,750 443,598 46,400 8,741 8,112,189 423 Sewer/Treatment Plant 17,172,110 569,190 179,750 - 51,000 10,574 17,982,624 424 Bond Reserve Fund 1,990,920 - - - - 1,990,920 511 Equipment Rental Fund 1,955,820 16,000 1,971,820 617 Firemen Pension Fund 59,610 59,610 Totals $98,329,200 $ 7,754,831 $ 954,960 1 $ (454,222) $ 539,152 1 $ 1,032,008 1 $ 108,155,929 r Q Packet Pg. 529 EXHIBIT "D": Budget Amendments (December 2016) 10.3.a Fund Number Change in Beginning Fund Balance Revenue Expense Change in Ending Fund Balance 001 599,095 641,605 (42,510) 111 42,433 42,310 123 123 - 20,000 (20,000) 125 - 62,275 (62,275) 126 246,998 246,271 727 132 - - - 421 232 (232) 422 8,741 (8,741) 423 10,574 (10,574) Total Change 888,526 1,032,008 1 (143,482) r Q Packet Pg. 530 10.3.a EXHIBIT "E": Budget Amendment Summary (December 2016) Fund BARS Category Debit Credit Pg# Description Previously Discussed by Council REET2 125 000 64 594 75 65 00 Construction 62,275 9 Bandshell at Frances Anderson Center REET 2 125 000 64 508 30 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 62,275 General Fund 001 000 393 00 000 00 Bond Proceeds 549,095 10 2007 LTGO Refinance General Fund 001 000 39 599 18 71 00 Bond Principal 541,008 General Fund 001 000 39 599 18 83 00 Bond Interest 2,761 General Fund 001 000 39 593 18 83 00 Bond Interest 7,499 General Fund 001 000 39 599 18 84 00 Debt Service Costs 5,327 General Fund 001 000 39 592 18 83 16 Bond Interest 9,110 General Fund 001 000 39 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 1,610 Street Fund 111 000 393 00 000 00 Bond Proceeds 42,433 Street Fund 111 000 68 599 95 71 00 Bond Principal 41,808 Street Fund 111 000 68 599 95 83 00 Bond Interest 213 Street Fund 111 000 68 593 95 83 00 Bond Interest 580 Street Fund 111 000 68 599 95 84 00 Debt Service Costs 412 Street Fund 111 000 68 592 95 83 16 Bond Interest 703 Street Fund 111 000 68 508 30 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 123 REET1 126 000 393 00 000 00 Bond Proceeds 246,998 REET1 126 000 39 599 75 71 00 Bond Principal 243,360 REET1 126 000 39 599 75 83 00 Bond Interest 1,242 REET1 126 000 39 593 75 83 00 Bond Interest 3,373 REET 1 126 000 39 599 75 84 00 Debt Service Costs 2,397 REET1 126 000 39 592 75 83 16 Bond Interest 4,101 REET1 126 000 39 508 30 00 00 EndingFund Balance 727 Water Utility 421 000 74 599 34 83 00 Bond Interest 143 Water Utility 421 000 71 593 34 83 00 Bond Interest 390 Water UtiIity 421 000 74 599 34 84 00 Debt Service Costs 277 Water Utility 421 000 74 592 34 83 16 Bond Interest 578 Water Utility 421 000 74 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 232 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 599 31 83 00 Bond Interest 5,232 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 593 31 83 00 Bond Interest 14,210 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 599 31 84 00 Debt Service Costs 10,095 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 592 31 83 16 Bond Interest 20,796 Stormwater Utility 422 000 72 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 8,741 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 599 35 83 00 Bond Interest 115 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 593 35 83 00 Bond Interest 312 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 599 35 84 00 Debt Servi ce Costs 222 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 592 35 83 16 Bond Interest 456 Sewer Utility 423 000 75 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 193 Sewer Utility 423 100 76 599 39 83 00 Bond Interest 6,216 Sewer Utility 423 100 76 593 39 83 00 Bond Interest 16,883 Sewer Utility 423 100 76 599 39 84 00 Debt Service Costs 11,994 Sewer Utility 423 100 76 592 1 39 83 16 Bond Interest 24,712 Sewer Utility 423 1 01 76 1 5081 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 10,381 New Items for Council General Fund 001 000 25 514 30 11 00 Salary 3,433 11 City Cl erk out of cl a ss pay General Fund 001 000 25 514 30 23 00 Benefits 687 General Fund 001 000 39 508 00 00 00 EndingFund Balance 4,120 General Fund 001 000 67 518 21 41 00 Professional Services 50,000 12 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study General Fund 001 000 337 10 000 00 Grant 50,000 General Fund 001 000 39 597 76 56 32 Interfund Transfer 40,000 13 Downtown Public Restroom Project General Fund 001 000 39 508 00 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 40,000 Park's Construction 132 000 337 10 000 00 Grant 40,000 Park's Construction 132 000 397 76 001 00 Interfund Transfer 40,000 Tourism Fund 123 000 64 573 20 41 00 Professional Services 20,000 14 Ecomonic Impact of the Arts Study Tourism Fund 123 000 64 508 30 00 00 Ending Fund Balance 20,000 r Q Packet Pg. 531 10.3.a EXHIBIT "F": Budget Amendments (December 2016) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: The replacement of the Bandshell at the Frances Anderson Center is well underway. The budget of $ 228,496 was authorized by Council on September 27, 2016. We are requesting additional authorization of $62,275 out of the REST balance for 2016. There are several factors that led to this cost increase, including: special inspections that are required for soils and rebar, Engineering staff time, unforeseen concrete demolition of the existing retainer wall, and extension, asbestos testing, and an asphalt overlay. One of the most costly of change orders is from deteriorating steel beams that were going to be reused. These now have to be demolished and new ones installed. Most, if not all of these conditions could not be identified until the demolition of the stage. We do have REET savings, and this will not impact the budget for 2017. Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Fund Name: PARKACQ/ EMPROVEM NT Division: Parks Title: Bands hell at Frances Anderson Preparer: Carrie Hite Department Account Number: 125.000.64.594.75.65.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Action 3a.4 (35): Creenways and Parks Budget Amendment Type? Previously Discussed By Council If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Capital Fill In Item Des cri tion[sI Baseline Budget 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Construction Projects 228,496 62,275 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $228,496 $62,275 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Fxpenses 1 $290,771 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue andEnding Cash Comments 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 125.000.64.508.30.00.00 62,275 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 01 0 1 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $62,275 $0 $0 $0 $0 pi Packet Pg. 532 EXHIBIT "F": Budget Amendments (December 2016) 10.3.a Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Rem Description: In October 2016, the City refunded the 2007 LTGO bond. This amendment increases the budget approprioation for the Governmental Funds to payoff the existing 2007 LTGO debt service and record the proceeds from Chase Bank. The Utility Fund activity (proprietary funds) are recorded directly into the balance sheet accounts. Since the 2016 interest payments were placed in escrow, the interest payment amounts need to be moved from the current interest BARS account to an escrow BARS account. The current interest BARS accounts were reduced by the amounts moved to the escrow accounts and increased by the 2016 Chase Bank interest payments. Department: Administrative Services Fund Name. MULTIPLE Division: Finance Title: 2007 LTGO Refinance Preparer: Deb S harp Department Account Number: Multiple Funds - See Below Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? Ifpreviously discussed, date(s) ofdiscussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Previously Discussed By Council One -Time Operating Fill In Item Des cri ions I Baseline Budget 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 001.000.393.00.000.00 0 549,095 0 0 0 0 111.000.393.00.000.00 0 42,433 0 0 0 0 126.000.393.00.000.00 0 246,998 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue $0 $838,526 $0 $0 $0 $0 001.000.39.599.18.71.00 0 541,008 0 0 0 0 111.000.68.599.95.71.00 0 41,808 0 0 0 0 126.000.39.599.75.71.00 0 243,360 0 0 0 0 001.000.39.599.18.83.00 0 2,761 0 0 0 0 111.000.68.599.95.83.00 0 213 0 0 0 0 126.000.39.599.75.83.00 0 1,242 0 0 0 0 421.000.74.599.34.83.00 0 143 0 0 0 0 422.000.72.599.31.83.00 0 5,232 0 0 0 0 423.000.75.599.35.83.00 0 115 0 0 0 0 423.100.76.599.39.83.00 0 6216 0 0 0 0 001.000.39.593.18.83.00 0 7,499 0 0 0 0 111.000.68.593.95.83.00 0 580 0 0 0 0 126.000.39.593.75.83.00 0 3,373 0 0 0 0 421.000.74.593.34.83.00 0 390 0 0 0 0 422.000.72.593.31.83.00 0 14,210 0 0 0 0 423.000.75.593.35.83.00 0 312 0 0 0 0 423.100.76.593.39.83.00 0 16,883 0 0 0 0 001.000.39.599.18.84.00 0 5,327 0 0 0 0 111. 000. 68.599.95.84. 00 0 412 0 0 0 0 12 6.000.39.599.75.84. 00 0 2,397 0 0 0 0 42 1.000.74.599.3 4.84. 00 0 277 0 0 01 0 422.000.72.599.3 1.84. 00 0 10,095 0 0 0 0 42 3.00 0.75.599.3 5.84. 00 0 222 0 0 0 0 42 3.10 0.76.599.3 9.84. 00 0 11,994 0 0 0 0 001.000.39.592.18.83.16 0 9110 0 0 0 0 111. 00 0. 68.592.95.83.16 0 703 0 0 0 0 126.000.39.592.75.83.16 0 4,101 0 0 0 0 421.000.74.592.34.83.16 0 578 0 0 0 0 422.000.72.592.31.83.16 0 (20,796) 0 01 0 0 423.000.75.592.35.83.16 1 0 456 0 0 0 0 423.100.76.592.39.83.16 0 (24,712) 0 0 0 0 Total Expenses $0 $855 613 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 Net Adjustment 17,087 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 Rewnueand Ending Cash Comments 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Ending Cash: Increase Decrease General Fund 1,610 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Increase Decrease Street Fund 123 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Increase Decrease REET1 727 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Increase Decrease Water Utility 232 0 0 0 0- Ending Cash: Increase Decrease Stormwater Utility 8,741 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Increase Decrease Sewer Utility 10174 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Endin Cash 17 087 $0 $0 $0 $0 10 a+ a Packet Pg. 533 10.3.a EXHIBIT "P: Budget Amendments (December 2016) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: Acting Pay totaling $4,119.26 ($3,432.72 salaries and $686.54 benefits) for the Deputy City Clerk when assigned to temporarily work in a position with a higher pay rate in order to fill a vacancy or act on behalf of an absent employee (City Personnel Policy 5.10). This amount represents three weeks acting pay and benefits during City Clerk vacation leave absence. Department: Mayor's Office Fund GENERAL Division: City Clerk's Office Title: City Clerk Out of Class Pay Name: Preparer: Scott Passey Department Account Number: Salaries 001.000.25.514.30.11.00 Benefits 001.000.25.514.30.23.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill InItem DescrI ion[sI Baseline Budge 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Actin Pay Salary 0 3,433 0 0 0 0 Acting Pay Benefits 0 687 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $0 $4,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total apenses 1 $4,120 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Fhding Cash Comments 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase) 001.000.39.508.00.00.00. 4,120 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase) 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Fading Cash $4,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 11 Packet Pg. 534 10.3.a EXHIBIT "F": Budget Amendments (December 2016) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: Increase the professional services budget to pay for the work completed in 2016 on the Edmonds Waterfront Access Study. The cost increase will be offset by funding received in 2015 from WSDOT, BNSF, Sound Transit and the Port of Edmonds. Department: Public Works Fund Name: GENERAL Division: Engineering Title: Edmonds Waterfront Access Study Preparer: Rob English Department Account Number: F5DB/c478 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: 4a.9 and 4a.10 Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Capital Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 .001.000.67.518.21.41.00 Professional Services 465,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $465,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Fxpenses 1 $515,000 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase) 0 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 001.000.337.10,000.00 50,000 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 12 Packet Pg. 535 10.3.a EXHIBIT "F": Budget Amendments (December 2016) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: The original budget for this project included an expectation the City would receive $40,000 from a Snohomish County Tourism grant. That grant was not received. It is requested that $40,000 in additional GF spending authority be awarded to the project to replace the grant proceeds that were not forthcoming. Department: Public Works & Utilities Fund Name: GINIItAI. DiA s ion: Facilities Title: Downtown Public Res troom Project Preparer: Thom Sullivan Department Account Number: 001.000.39.597.76.56.32 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Capital Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 001.000.39.597.76.56.32 Inter and Transfer 428,637 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $428,637 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $468,637 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase) 001.000.39.508.00.00.00 40,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 132.000.337.10,000.00 (40,000) 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 132.000.397.76.001.00 40,000 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 13 Packet Pg. 536 10.3.a EXHIBIT "F": Budget Amendments (December 2016) Budget Amendment for: Fourth Quarter Item Description: Expenditure of up to $20,000 from Fund 123 (Arts Promotion for Tourism) for a study of the economic impact of the arts in Edmonds, consisting of up to $8,000 in lodging tax revenue and up to $12,000 in revenue from arts poster sales. Department: Economic Development/Community Services Fund Name: TOURISM PROMOTIONAL✓ ARTS Division: Title: Economic Impact of the Arts Study Preparer: Patrick Doherty Department Account Number: 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 Strategic Plan Task Action Item: 1d.2 Budget Amendment Type? I New Item For Council To Consider If previously discussed, date(s) of discussion: What is the nature of the expenditure? I One -Time Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? I Operating Fill In Item Description[s] Baseline Budget 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Fund 123 - lodging tax andposter sales 0 20,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub -Total $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses 1 $20,000 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 Revenue and Ending Cash Comments 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Ending Cash: Decrease (Increase) 123.000.64.508.30.00.00 20,000 0 0 0 0 Ending Cash: Decrease Increase 0 0 0 0 0 Grants/Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 General Fund Subsidy 0 0 0 0 0 New Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 Total Revenue and Ending Cash $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 14 Packet Pg. 537 10.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Prosecutor's contract renewal (10 min.) Staff Lead: Mary Ann Hardie Department: Human Resources Preparer: MaryAnn Hardie Background/History The City has a contract for prosecutor services. The prosecutor's contract previously expired at the end of December, 2015 and a one year extension renewal was agreed upon for 2016. The current prosecutor's contract expires at the end of December 2016. The City has been in negotiations with the current prosecutor (Zachor & Thomas) to renew their contract for 2017 & 2018. Staff Recommendation It is recommended that Council approve the attached two-year contract for prosecution services with Zachor & Thomas, Inc., P.S. for 2017 -2018. Narrative The City has been in negotiations with the current prosecutor (Zachor & Thomas) to renew their contract for 2017 & 2018. The City has had a long-standing service history with Zachor & Thomas. Because the City has had so many changes in the court, it is recommended the City continue to contract with Zachor & Thomas to provide some consistency during this period. These changes including having a new Judge, Public Defender, implementing the public defense compliance standards, evaluation of process/court improvements and hiring a new Court Administrator (in early 2017) which have been impactful on court services. Based on the discussions, procedural changes in the court, in the indigent defense standards, an increase in retaining qualified legal staff, overhead, malpractice insurance, continuing education costs, retainer and caseloads there will be an increase in prosecution service costs. This includes an additional $50,000 for 2017 and $58,000 for 2018. A copy of the current contract as well as the proposed 2017- 2018 contract and addendum is attached. It is further recommended that the City publish an RFP for prosecutor services either by the end of 2017 or in 2018. Attachments: Zachor Thomas Amendment No. 2 Final 11.28.16 Attachment A - Zachor Thomas 2017 Addendum Current Prosecutor's contract Packet Pg. 538 10.4.a AMENDMENT NO.2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PROSECUTING ATTORNEY SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and the Law Offices of Zachor & Thomas, Inc., P.S. (hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant"), entered into an underlying agreement for the provision of prosecuting attorney services dated January 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the "Underlying Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the Underlying Agreement, pursuant to its Amendment 1, is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2016, but whereas the Underlying Agreement provides the Consultant the opportunity to submit a proposed contract amendment or extension; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the Underlying Agreement through the 2017 calendar year with an option to further extend through the 2018 calendar year; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to increase the payments to be made pursuant to the Underlying Agreement for the 2017 calendar year and agree to extend the term of the Underlying Agreement until December 31, 2017, with an option to extend for one additional year at the payment rates set forth below; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The Underlying Agreement, which is incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, is amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Payments. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the Underlying Agreement shall be amended as follows, which provisions shall apply to payments made during the 2017 calendar year, and if the parties agree to extend the Underlying Agreement through 2018, such payments shall be increased in 2018 as set forth in Section 2.1 of this Amendment 2. 2.1 Base Rate: The Prosecutor shall receive a monthly retainer of TWENTY ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY EIGHT AND 00/100, $21,558.00, per month for performance of those duties set forth in Attachment A, Scope of Work 2017. If the parties agree in writing to extend this Agreement through December 31, 2018, that retainer shall increase by 3% as of January 1, 2018. To effectuate such an extension, the parties must set forth their intention to extend in the form of a countersigned letter, Memorandum of Understanding, or other writing on which both parties' signatures appear, no later than October 1, 2017. 2.2 Hourly Rate: Services performed outside the scope of work described in Attachment A, or which may be mutually agreed upon to be added at a later date, or additional court calendars, including preparation and appearance time, shall be in addition to the base rate set forth in paragraph 2.1. Absent a separate Packet Pg. 539 10.4.a agreement, those services shall be billed at a rate of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY- FIVE DOLLARS ($125.00) per hour. Any Rules of Appeal of Decisions of Courts of Limited Jurisdiction (RALJ) case filed in Superior Court, or criminal case filed into the South Division of Snohomish County District Court shall be billed at the rate of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($125.00) per hour. Forfeitures shall be billed at a flat rate of THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($300.00) per case. Any other cases filed at the Court of Appeals; cases filed at the Supreme Court; cases filed in another Division of the Snohomish County District Court; forfeiture cases filed in courts other than the Edmonds Municipal Court, or Lynnwood Municipal Court, which require the appearance of the Consultant; and such other activities agreed to by the City and the Consultant, shall be billed at ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($150.00) per hour. The Consultant shall obtain written approval from the City prior to pursuing appeal of any matter beyond the Superior Court. 1.2 Scope of Work. The Attachment A Scope of Work shall be replaced with the Attachment A Scope of Work attached hereto. 2. In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement between the parties shallto 7 Go remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth herein, but only as set forth herein. The N parties' Amendment 1 to the Underlying Agreement shall be of no further force or effect. DATED this day of , 2016. CITY OF EDMONDS ZACHOR & THOMAS, INC., P.S. David O. Earling, Mayor By: Its: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Packet Pg. 540 10.4.a STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2016, before me, the under -signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , and executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that s/he was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Packet Pg. 541 10.4.a Attachment A Scope of Work 2017 Zachor & Thomas Prosecution Services The Consultant shall provide the following services: 1. Review police incident reports for determination of charging; if reviews exceed 125 cases per year the Consultant shall bill hourly for services with a cap of $150.00 per case; Maintain all current cases in an appropriate filing system; 3. Review and remain familiar with filed criminal misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor cases; 4. Interview witnesses as necessary in preparation of prosecution cases; 5. Respond to discovery requests, make sentence recommendations and prepare legal to r memoranda, when necessary; N 6. Prepare cases for trial, including the issuance of witness subpoenas (for service by the Police Department, when applicable), conduct evidence retrieval (with the assistance of the Police Department and other City agencies), and prepare jury instructions, as necessary; 7. Represent the City at all arraignments, pretrial hearings, motion hearings, review hearings, in -custody hearings and trials on currently scheduled court days as of 2016; 8. Prosecute contested code and traffic infraction violations which are scheduled on the regular criminal calendar; 9. Represent the City in the prosecution of drug, felony, and firearm forfeitures that are filed by the City in the Edmonds Municipal Court or Lynnwood Municipal Court. Forfeitures shall be billed at a flat rate of $300 per case. Notice of Intended Forfeitures and Seizure Hearings shall be set in the Court of jurisdiction within 90 days of receipt of Notice of Demand for Hearing; 10. Be available to the Police Department for questions at all reasonable times, by providing appropriate telephone numbers, cell phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and voice mail access. Calls shall be returned as soon as practicable. At a time and date to be mutually agreed upon by the parties, the Consultant shall conduct yearly training with the Police Department. Packet Pg. 542 10.4.a The Consultant maintains a business office in the City of Edmonds and Police Officers may meet with the Consultant during normal business hours, when the Consultant is available; 11. Consult with the City Attorney, as needed, regarding Edmonds City Code amendments. Services provided under this Agreement play an important part in fostering public confidence in the criminal justice system and are an important and essential part of law enforcement. All services provided under this Agreement shall be in accord with the Rules of Professional Responsibility, local court rules and the normal standard of care among prosecutors in Western Washington. to r 00 N Packet Pg. 543 10.4.b Attachment A Scope of Work 2017 Zachor & Thomas Prosecution Services The Consultant shall provide the following services: 1. Review police incident reports for determination of charging; if reviews exceed 125 cases per year the Consultant shall bill hourly for services with a cap of $150.00 per case; Maintain all current cases in an appropriate filing system; 3. Review and remain familiar with filed criminal misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor cases; 4. Interview witnesses as necessary in preparation of prosecution cases; 5. Respond to discovery requests, make sentence recommendations and prepare legal memoranda, when necessary; 6. Prepare cases for trial, including the issuance of witness subpoenas (for service by the Police Department, when applicable), conduct evidence retrieval (with the assistance of the Police Department and other City agencies), and prepare jury instructions, as necessary; 7. Represent the City at all arraignments, pretrial hearings, motion hearings, review hearings, in -custody hearings and trials on currently scheduled court days as of 2016; 8. Prosecute contested code and traffic infraction violations which are scheduled on the regular criminal calendar; 9. Represent the City in the prosecution of drug, felony, and firearm forfeitures that are filed by the City in the Edmonds Municipal Court or Lynnwood Municipal Court. Forfeitures shall be billed at a flat rate of $300 per case. Notice of Intended Forfeitures and Seizure Hearings shall be set in the Court of jurisdiction within 90 days of receipt of Notice of Demand for Hearing; 10. Be available to the Police Department for questions at all reasonable times, by providing appropriate telephone numbers, cell phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and voice mail access. Calls shall be returned as soon as practicable At a time and date to be mutually agreed upon by the parties, the Consultant shall conduct yearly training with the Police Department. Packet Pg. 544 10.4.b The Consultant maintains a business office in the City of Edmonds and Police Officers may meet with the Consultant during normal business hours, when the Consultant is available; 11. Consult with the City Attorney, as needed, regarding Edmonds City Code amendments. Services provided under this Agreement play an important part in fostering public confidence in the criminal justice system and are an important and essential part of law enforcement. All services provided under this Agreement shall be in accord with the Rules of Professional Responsibility, local court rules and the normal standard of care among prosecutors in Western Washington. Packet Pg. 545 10.4.c AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT PROSECUTING ATTORNEY SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and the Law Offices of Zachor & Thomas, Inc., P.S. (hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant"), entered into an underlying agreement for the provision of prosecuting attorney services dated January 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the "Underlying Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the Underlying Agreement is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2015, but provides the Consultant the opportunity to submit a proposed contract for the 2016 calendar year; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the Underlying Agreement through the 2016 calendar year; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to increase the payments to be made pursuant to the Underlying Agreement for the 2016 calendar year; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The Underling Agreement, which is incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, is amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Payments. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the Underlying Agreement shall be amended as follows, which provisions shall apply to payments made during the 2016 calendar year only, and shall not be increased by the Payment Rate Adjustment provided for in Section 2.3 of the Underlying Agreement: 2.1 Base Rate: The Prosecutor shall receive a monthly retainer of SEVENTEEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED THIRTY DOLLARS ($17,430.00) per month for performance of those duties set forth in Attachment A, Scope of Work, to the Underlying Agreement. 2.2 HourI Rate: Services performed outside the Scope of Work described in Attachment A, or which may be mutually agreed upon to be added at a later date, or additional court calendars, including preparation and appearance time, shall be in addition to the base rate set forth in paragraph 2.1. Absent a separate agreement, those services shall be billed at a rate of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY- FIVE DOLLARS ($125.00) per hour. Any Rules of Appeal of Decisions of Courts of Limited Jurisdiction (RALJ) case filed in Superior Court, or criminal case filed into the South Division of Snohomish County District Court shall be billed at the rate of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($125.00) per hour. Forfeitures shall be billed at a flat rate of THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS f`�r' Packet Pg. 546 10.4.c ($300.00) per case. Motions set and confirmed on Tuesdays by the Court as part of the new 2015 court calendar shall be billed at a flat rate of THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($300.00) per calendar, with a cap of TWELVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($12,000.00) for the 2016 calendar year. If reviews of police incident reports for determination of charging exceed 125 cases in 2016, the Consultant shall bill hourly for such services with a cap of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($150.00) per case over the 125 case threshold. Any other cases filed at the Court of Appeals; cases filed at the Supreme Court; cases filed in a District Court Division other than the South Division of the Snohomish County District Court; forfeiture cases filed or removed in courts other than before the Edmonds Chief Law Enforcement Officer or his/her Designee, which may require the appearance of the Consultant; and such other activities agreed to by the City and the Consultant, shall be billed at ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($150.00) per hour. The Consultant shall obtain written approval from the City prior to pursuing or appearing on appeal of any matter beyond the Superior Court. 1.2 Scope of Work. Paragraph 9 of the Underlying Agreement's Scope of Work shall be amended as follows: 9. Represent the City in the prosecution of drug, felony, and firearm forfeitures that are filed by the City before the Edmonds Chief Law Enforcement Officer or his/her Designee. Forfeitures shall be billed at a flat rate of $300.00 per case. Notice of Intended Forfeitures and Seizure Hearings pursuant to RCW 69.50.505 and RCW 10.105.010 shall be set before the Edmonds Chief Law Enforcement Officer or his/her Designee within ninety (90) days of receipt of Notice of Demand for Hearing. 2. In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth herein, but only as set forth herein. Nothing in this agreement precludes the Consultant and the City from renegotiating these terms should there be a significant change in case filings, court dates or case management. DATED this 4* day of Air, 2015. CITY OF EDMONDS ZACHOR & THOMAS, INC., P.S. 1 O. Earling, Mayor By: Its: Packet Pg. 547 10.4.c ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, APPRO D AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this 4 day of �cc�wt fit►-- , 2015, before me, the under -signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared R 9a- mc.r 7,t 6r . and executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be his/her free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that s/he was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Lw"� �e_ tZL_ (NOTARY PUBLIC 5 5 s�AN vmkq'' �� // _ oq fig'•., My commission expires: 50 T R� �$ s 0 ��O +'WASkkNk � jN Packet Pg. 548 10.4.c PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into between the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City"), and the Law Offices of Zachor & Thomas, Inc., P.S. (hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant"). WHEREAS, the City has established its municipal court under the provisions of Chapter 3.50 RCW and Edmonds City Code 2.15; WHEREAS, the City wishes to contract with a skilled firm with attorneys familiar with the prosecution of criminal and infraction matters involving allegations of violation of municipal ordinances; WHEREAS, the Consultant and its attorneys are licensed to practice law in the State of Washington and have experience as prosecutors within the State of Washington and the City of Edmonds; WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have a current contract for prosecutorial services that expires on December 31St, 2012; and WHEREAS, the City has been satisfied with the services of the Consultant; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and benefits to be derived, this Agreement is entered into on a date specified hereafter between the City and the Consultant, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below: 1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with the Scope of Work that is marked as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work, and shall consist of the following: 2.1. Base Rate: The Prosecutor shall receive a monthly retainer of THIRTEEN THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED AND NINETY DOLLARS ($13,390.00) per month for performance of those duties set forth in Attachment A, Scope of Work. 2.2. Hourly Rate. Services performed outside the scope of work described in Attachment A, or which may be mutually agreed upon to be added at a later date, or additional court calendars shall be in addition to the base rate set forth in paragraph 2.1. Absent a separate agreement, those services shall be billed at a rate of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100.00) per hour. Any Rules of Appeal of Decisions of Courts of Limited Jurisdiction ( RALJ ) case filed in Packet Pg. 549 �z� 10.4.c Superior Court, criminal case filed into the South Division of Snohomish County District Court shall be billed at the rate of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS TWENTY FIVE ($125.00) per hour. Forfeitures shall be billed at a flat rate of $300 per case. Any other cases filed at the Court of Appeals; cases filed at the Supreme Court; cases filed in another Division of the Snohomish County District Court; forfeiture cases filed in courts other than the Edmonds Municipal Court, or Lynnwood Municipal Court, which require the appearance of the Prosecutor; and such other activities agreed to by the City and the Prosecutor, shall be billed at ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($150.00) per hour. The Consultant shall obtain written approval from the City prior to pursuing appeal of any matter beyond the Superior Court. 2.3 Fees Review. The schedule of fees provided for in paragraph 2.1 and 2.2 shall apply for the contract period reflected in Article 4. Should the court substantially alter the requirements of the Consultant, the Consultant shall provide notification to the City. Changes in fees shall be proposed by the Consultant to the Mayor. Any changes must be mutually agreed to by the Mayor and the Consultant, and then must be approved by the Edmonds City Council. Upon acceptance by all parties, the changes will be made a part of this Agreement. Payment Rate Adjustment. The payment rate shall be increased each January 1st by the greater of the CPI-W Seattle -Tacoma -Bremerton or 2%, but not to exceed 5%. This shall take into account the cost of doing business as well as the cost of nominal filing increases. Should the criminal filings exceed a 10% increase or decrease per calendar year, the parties may renegotiate the terms of this fee agreement. 2.4 Costs. The City shall be the sole obligor and shall pay all witness fees, expert witness fees (including but not limited to Speed Measuring Device Experts), transcript and document fee's and interpreters' fees determined to be necessary by the Consultant in the preparation and disposition of its cases. The City shall approve all other anticipated fees, before such expense is incurred. The City will not unreasonably delay in granting approval of such expenses. The City further agrees to hold the Consultant harmless from such expenses and costs as set forth hereinabove. 2.5 Assistant Prosecutors. The City contracts with the Consultant for a monthly fee for prosecution services. Should the Consultant be absent, it shall be the responsibility of the Consultant to provide substitute coverage with a properly licensed State of Washington attorney, who has been previously approved by the Court. All individuals providing services under this Agreement (including substitute attorneys) must wear City -issued 2 f• Packet Pg. 550 10.4.c identification when in the Public Safety Building as issued by the Police Department. If a "Conflict Prosecutor" is required, such "Conflict Prosecutor" shall be approved by the City through its Court. In the event of a dispute regarding approval of any individual, the Edmonds City Council shall be final arbiter. The City is responsible for any costs associated with the "Conflict Prosecutor, where there is an actual conflict with the City. 3. Ownership and use of documents. All City files and other documents maintained by the Consultant shall be the files of the City and accessible. by the City through its City Attorney or other duly authorized representative during normal business hours, subject to the Washington State Bar Association Rules of Ethics. At the request of the City, any and all files maintained by the Consultant shall be tendered to the City, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Washington State Bar Association Rules of Ethics. All equipment and facilities furnished by the City shall remain the sole property of the City. Any equipment, facilities and materials provided by the Consultant shall remain the sole property of the Consultant. 4. Term of Contract. The term of this Agreement shall be from the first day of January, 2013 through December 31, 2015. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, all other existing contracts and/or agreements between the parties for prosecutorial services shall terminate. The Consultant shall submit a proposed contract for the calendar year 2016 by mutual date of the parties. It is anticipated that negotiations for renewal of this contract will take place prior to the expiration of 2015; provided, however, that if no negotiations shall occur, or if no agreement has been reached, this contract shall be renewed automatically for one calendar year, subject to the same terms and conditions set forth herein. Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this Agreement promptly in accordance with the receipt of the required governmental approvals. 5. Hold harmless agreement. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the Consultant's negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this Agreement; provided that nothing herein shall require the Consultant to indemnify the City against and hold harmless the City from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the City, its agents, officers and employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of: (a) the Consultant's agents or employees; and (b) the City, its agents, officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to: (1) claims or suits based upon such negligence; and/or (2) the costs to the City of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence or the negligence of the Consultant's agents or employees. The Consultant shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including state statutes and the Washington Rules for Professional Conduct. The Consultant specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the Consultant's own employees against the City and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, 41 Packet Pg. 551 10.4.c the Consultant specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. 6. General and professional liabill1y insuranc . The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by this Agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types described below from insurers licensed to do business in the State of Washington, and which have a current A.M. Best rating of not less than AXII: A. Worker's Compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. B. Professional Liability and General Malpractice Insurance shall be maintained throughout the term of this contract. The Consultant's Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, that they shall be primary insurance as respect to the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and Professional Liability Insurance secured by the Consultant, the City will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The Consultant shall furnish the City with verification of insurance in the form of original certificates and copies of any amendatory endorsements required by the Agreement evidencing the insurance requirements before commencement of the work. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation within two business days of their receipt of such notice. The Consultant's professional liability to the City shall be limited to the amount payable under this Agreement or one million dollars ($1,000,000), whichever is the greater, unless modified elsewhere in this Agreement. In no case shall the Consultant's professional liability to third parties be limited in any way. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five (5) business days' notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediate terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, race, creed, color, national origin, honorably discharged veteran or military fl Packet Pg. 552 10.4.c status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical disability or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a person with a disability. 8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees, representatives and subcontractors during the performance of this contract. 9. Oty approvalof workrelathouships. Notwithstanding the Consultant's status as an independent contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this contract must meet the approval of the City. 10. Termination. The attorney/client relationship is personal and involves the ability of the parties to communicate and maintain credibility. This is an agreement for legal services and the City as client may terminate the agreement for any reason upon one hundred twenty (120) days notice. In the event of termination, work in progress will be completed by Consultant if authorized by the City under terms acceptable to both parties. If completion of work in progress is not authorized or acceptable terms cannot be worked out, Consultant will submit all unfinished documents, reports, or other material to City and Consultant will be entitled to receive payment for any and all satisfactory work completed prior to the effective date of termination. 11. Integration. The entire agreement between the parties shall consist of this document and the Consultant's proposal, attached hereto as Exhibit A. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibit A, this Agreement shall control. 12. Changes Additional Work. The City may engage Consultant to perform services in addition to those listed in this Agreement, and Consultant will be entitled to additional compensation for authorized additional services or materials as described in 2.2. The City shall not be liable for additional compensation until and unless any and all additional work and compensation is approved in advance in writing and signed by both parties to this Agreement. If conditions are encountered which are not anticipated in the Scope of Services, the City understands that a revision to the Scope of Services and fees may be required. Provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to obligate the Consultant to render or the City to pay for services rendered in excess of the Scope of Services in Exhibit A unless or until an amendment to this Agreement is approved in writing by both parties. 13. Standard of Care. Consultant represents that Consultant has the necessary knowledge, skill and experience to perform services required by this Agreement. Consultant and any persons employed by Consultant shall use their best efforts to perform the work in a professional manner consistent with sound engineering practices, in E Packet Pg. 553 10.4.c accordance with the schedules herein and in accordance with the usual and customary professional care required for services of the type described in the Scope of Services. 14. Non -waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 15. Non -assignable. The services to be provided by the Consultant shall not be assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City. 16. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 17. Compliance with laws. The Consultant in the performance of this Agreement shall comply with all applicable Federal, State or local laws and ordinances, including regulations for licensing, certification and operation of facilities, programs and accreditation, and licensing of individuals, and any other standards or criteria as described in the Agreement to assure quality of services. The Consultant specifically agrees to pay any applicable business and occupation (B & 0) taxes which may be due on account of this Agreement. 18. Notices. Notices to the City shall be sent to the following address: City of Edmonds Human Resources 121 Fifth Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address: Zachor & Thomas, Inc., P.S. 23607 Highway 99, Suite 1D Edmonds, Washington 98026 Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three days after deposit of written notice in the U.S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed. C Packet Pg. 554 10.4.c DATED THIS DAY OF January , 20 13 CITY EDM D ZACHOR AS, INC., P t � By • 06 + By - David 0. Earling, Mayor H. Jame ,Jr. I Preside narJ ATTEST: Sandra S. Chase, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: of the City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this 17th day of January , 2013 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared H. James zachor, Jr. , to me known to be the President of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. nd official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above NOTARY PUBLIC in M. Ortega My commission expires: 7/99f. 0)14 7 Packet Pg. 555 10.4.c Attachment A Scope of Work Zachor & Thomas Prosecution Services The Consultant shall provide the following services 1. Review police incident reports for determination of charging; 2 Maintain all current cases in an appropriate filing system; 3 Review and remain familiar with filed criminal misdemeanor and gross misdemeanor cases; 4 Interview witnesses as necessary in preparation of prosecution of cases; 5 Respond to discovery requests, make sentence recommendations and prepare legal memoranda, when necessary; Packet Pg. 556 10.4.c 6 Prepare cases for trial, including the issuance of witness subpoenas (for service by the Police Department, when applicable), conduct evidence retrieval (with the assistance of the Police Department and other City agencies), and prepare jury instructions, as necessary; 7. Represent the City at all arraignments, pretrial hearings, motion hearings, review hearings, in -custody hearings, and trials on currently scheduled court days; 8. Prosecute contested code and traffic infraction violations which are scheduled on the regular criminal calendar; 9 Represent the City in the prosecution of drug, felony, and firearm forfeitures that are filed by the City in the Edmonds Municipal Court or Lynnwood Municipal Court.. Forfeitures shall be billed at a flat rate of $300 per case. Notice of Intended Forfeitures and Seizure Hearings shall be set in the Court of jurisdiction within 90 days of receipt of Notice of Demand for Hearing. 10 Be available to the Police Department for questions at all reasonable times, by providing appropriate telephone numbers, cell phone numbers, e-mail addresses, and voice mail access. Calls shall be returned as soon as practicable. At a time and date to be mutually agreed upon by the parties, the Consultant shall conduct yearly training with the Police Department. The Consultant maintains a business office in the City of Edmonds and Police Officers may meet with the Consultant at anytime during normal business hours, when the Consultant is available. 11. Consult with the City Attorney, as needed, regarding Edmonds City Code amendments. Services provided under this Agreement play an important part in fostering public confidence in the criminal justice system and are an important and essential part of law enforcement. All services provided under this Agreement shall be in accord with the Rules of Professional Responsibility, local court rules and the normal standard of care among prosecutors in Western Washington. E Packet Pg. 557 10.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 12/6/2016 Presentation of Bids for the Veteran's Plaza Project (5 minutes) Staff Lead: Carrie Hite Department: Engineering Preparer: Megan Luttrell Background/History On January 20, 2015, Council approved the concept for the Veterans Plaza. On August 2, 2016, Council authorized the Mayor to sign the revised Goods & Materials Agreement for the procurement of stone cladding, paving and site furnishings for the Edmonds Veterans Plaza from Coldspring. On August 23, 2016, Council authorized the Mayor to sign a Change Authorization for the Goods & Materials Agreement for the procurement of stone cladding, paving and site furnishings for the Edmonds Veterans Plaza from Coldspring. On September 6, 2016, Council rejected bids for the Edmonds Veterans Plaza. Staff Recommendation Forward this item to the December 13th consent agenda for approval. Narrative On December 6, 2016, the City will receive and open bids for the Edmonds Veterans Plaza construction project. The engineer's estimate is $285,748. The Edmonds Veterans Plaza is a community project to support, create and build memorials to Edmond's military veterans. The project will provide site improvements and enhancements to the existing City of Edmonds Municipal Court Plaza and immediate surroundings. It includes a new stone - clad wall with two waterfall feature elements, related mechanical, plumbing and electrical work, new paving, walls, stairs and handrails, new site furnishings and lighting, modifications to existing planting and irrigation, minor modifications to the existing parking lot and new utility connections. The project costs are being funded by the Edmonds Veteran Plaza Fund. Packet Pg. 558