The URL can be used to link to this page

2013-09-17 City Council - Public Agenda-1515'4- o 90� AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers — Public Safety Complex 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 6:15 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 1. (5 Minutes) Roll Call 2. (45 Minutes) Convene in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.3 0.11 0(l)(i). RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION / FLAG SALUTE 3. (5 Minutes) Approval of Agenda 4. (5 Minutes) Approval of Consent Agenda Items A. AM-6113 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of September 10, 2013. B. AM-6111 Approval of claim checks #204215 through #204359 dated September 12, 2013 for $1,007,587.92. C. AM-6079 Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Mike McCausland (amount undetermined), Jon Hie ($20,000.00), Clifford and Marie Hackney (amount undetermined), Carole and Merlin Kleven (amount undetermined), Jodi Sackville ($500,000.00), and Frontier (amount undetermined). D. AM-6101 Approval of Edmonds businesses applying for renewal of their Washington State Liquor Control Board liquor licenses for the month of August 2013. E. AM-6105 Authorization to contract with James G. Murphy to sell surplus city vehicles. F. AM-6103 Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #4 with David Evans & Associates for the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements project. Packet Page 1 of 895 5. Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)* *Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings 6. (15 Minutes) Hearing Examiner Annual Report. AM-6115 7. (10 Minutes) July 2013 Budgetary Financial Report AM-6049 8. (10 Minutes) Recommendation for Department Presentations During 2014 Council Budget Process AM-6106 9. (10 Minutes) City Assets invested in the County Investment Pool AM-6107 10. (30 Minutes) Presentation of 2013 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update and proposed sewer AM-6110 utility rate increases. 11. (30 Minutes) Continued discussion regarding Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics. AM-6112 12. (30 Minutes) Discussion: Edmonds City Code Chapter 2.10 Revisions. AM-6074 13. (15 Minutes) Report on City Council Committee Meetings of September 10, 2013. AM-6114 14. (5 Minutes) Mayor's Comments 15. (15 Minutes) Council Comments 16. (15 Minutes) Convene in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.3 0.11 0(l)(i). 17. (5 Minutes) Reconvene in open session. Potential action as a result of meeting in executive session. ADJOURN Packet Page 2 of 895 AM-6113 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: Submitted By: Sandy Chase Department: City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Type: Action Information Committee Action: Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of September 10, 2013. Recommendation Review and approval. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attached is a copy of the draft minutes. 09-10-13 Draft City Council Minutes Inbox Mayor Finalize for Agenda Form Started By: Sandy Chase Final Approval Date: 09/12/2013 Attachments Form Review Reviewed By Date Dave Earling 09/12/2013 04:39 PM Sandy Chase 09/12/2013 04:57 PM Started On: 09/12/2013 11:54 AM 4. A. Packet Page 3 of 895 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES September 10, 2013 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Lora Petso, Council President Joan Bloom, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Frank Yamamoto, Councilmember* *participated by phone Strom Peterson, Councilmember (arrived 6:34 p.m.) 1. ROLL CALL STAFF PRESENT Al Compaan, Police Chief Stephen Clifton, Community Services/Economic Development Director Phil Williams, Public Works Director Roger Neumaier, Finance Director Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Rob Chave, Acting Development Services Dir. Rob English, City Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Sandy Chase, City Clerk Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst. Jeannie Dines, Recorder Mayor Earling advised Councilmember Peterson would be arriving late and Councilmember Yamamoto was participating by telephone. City Clerk Sandy Chase called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmember Peterson. 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETSO, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Peterson was not present for the vote.) 3. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Council President Petso requested Item D be removed from the Consent Agenda. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Peterson was not present for the vote.) The agenda items approved are as follows: A. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 3, 2013. B. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #204119 THROUGH #204214 DATED SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 FOR $1,864,367.81. APPROVAL OF REPLACEMENT PAYROLL CHECK #60428 $601.98, PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS #60429 THROUGH #60452 FOR $460,730.55, BENEFIT CHECKS #60453 THROUGH #60464 AND WIRE PAYMENTS OF $200,314.80 FOR THE PERIOD AUGUST 16, 2013 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2013. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 10, 2013 Page 1 Packet Page 4 of 895 C. RESOLUTION NO. 1297 APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING THE AUGUST 27, 2013 PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM ORDINANCE NO.3931. E. RESOLUTION NO. 1299 APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING THE SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM ORDINANCE NO.3938. Item D: RESOLUTION NO. 1298 APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT REGARDING THE SEPTEMBER 3, 2013 PUBLIC HEARING ON INTERIM ORDINANCE NO.3935. Council President Petso explained this was the interim ordinance regarding paving and construction in critical area buffers in exchange for hoped for enhancements of the critical area. She did not support the interim ordinance and planned to vote against the resolution. She pointed out the Findings of Fact, particularly Findings 2 and 4, speak of allowing development within the already developed footprint; the ordinance allows development and expansion of the already developed footprint. She was concerned the Findings of Fact did not justify the action taken in the ordinance. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the interim ordinance will only be in place for six months and is being reviewed by the Planning Board. To date there have only been two projects, one of them was the City Park which staff reviewed with the Council in detail. She summarized the information provided was sufficient to allow the Council to proceed with the interim ordinance. Councilmember Bloom asked whether Council President Petso wanted the Findings of Fact to be changed to reflect the interim ordinance. Council President Petso responded she had not given that any thought because she planned to vote against the resolution because she disagreed with the premise of paving and building in the critical area buffer. She suggested the Findings of Fact justify paving within the critical area buffer. She summarized the ordinance adds beyond the footprint of the developed area. COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM D. Councilmember Peterson asked whether Findings of Fact are prepared for every ordinance. City Attorney Jeff Taraday responded there are whereas clauses in nearly every ordinance. The difference between this process and a typical ordinance process is when the Council adopts an interim zoning ordinance or a moratorium, State law requires the Council to conduct a public hearing and adopt Findings of Fact that justify the interim zoning ordinance or moratorium. Councilmember Peterson stated the Council has adopted Findings of Fact for an interim ordinance or moratorium a fair number of times. Mr. Taraday responded he would like to think so. Councilmember Peterson suggested Councilmembers who do not support an interim ordinance do not necessarily need to object to the Findings of Fact. He suggested Councilmembers respect the decision made by the body as a whole and move forward. For example, he did not support the moratorium on marijuana businesses but would support the Findings of Fact. As the Findings of Fact are not consistent with the interim ordinance and the interim ordinance allows an increase in the footprint in areas that are physically separated and functionally isolated, Councilmember Bloom asked if the Findings of Fact need to be corrected. Mr. Taraday responded as with any resolution or ordinance, the Council can propose amendments. It would be appropriate for a Councilmember to propose an additional finding to add to the findings in the resolution. He was not sure it was correct to say there is a right or wrong finding to justify; it is whatever the Council feels justifies adoption of the ordinance. Councilmember Bloom asked Mr. Taraday to read the section in question. Mr. Taraday responded there are seven whereas clauses incorporated into the resolution. Council President Petso advised Findings 2 and 4 refer to the footprint of existing development. Mr. Taraday agreed, but he was not sure it was correct to say they were inconsistent with the ordinance because the ordinance does speak to the footprint Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 10, 2013 Page 2 Packet Page 5 of 895 of development. If the Council wanted to more fully reflect the other component of the interim ordinance, a finding could be added that specifically addresses physically separated and functionally isolated. THE VOTE ON THE MOTION CARRIED (4-2-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETSO AND COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM VOTING NO AND COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-MONILLAS ABSTAINING. 4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Donna Breske, Snohomish, property owner in Edmonds, explained on June 30, 2013 she submitted an application for a single family building permit at 9330 218th Place SW. On July 22, 2013 she received review comments that state in order to get a building permit to build a single family home, they needed to divert water from the City's storm drain system and become the storm repository for surrounding City streets. The City's conclusion in the July 22, 2013 letter was based on a previous permit application submitted 6 years ago, a previous section of code and a Hearing Examiner decision that was based on that previous code. She asked the City to review her application and support their conclusions with the current drainage code. She referred to Mr. Williams' rebuttal to her comments on August 6 and his statement that she needed to find the right forum to express her concerns. She asked to be informed if this type of information was not allowed at a City Council meeting. She has written emails and letters and called Jeanie McConnell, Phil Williams and Jeff Taraday. She advised it had been nearly three months since she submitted her building permit application; it was becoming a violation of her due process rights. She summarized the City needs to review her building permit application and support their conclusions with the current code. Mayor Earling advised he has called a meeting on September 17 to address this issue and will respond to her following that meeting. 5. AUTHORIZATION TO APPROVE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE 190TH PLACE SW RETAINING WALL. Public Works Director Phil Williams recalled the Council authorized the Mayor to sign a settlement agreement and mutual release with the Meiers for construction of a soldier pile wall on 190th Place Southwest; the Mayor signed the agreement on August 7, 2013. The work, being done by a contractor hired by the Meiers, should take a couple weeks to complete. The wall that was designed and is in the process of being constructed was 112 feet long, extending from approximately the intersection to the Meiers' property line. Within the past few months, the abutting property owner to the south and west removed vegetation from the slope. After locating the placement of the proposed wall, piles and storm line, it makes sense to extend the wall by 24 feet or 3 more piles in order to secure the slope that may fail in a catastrophic event. He requested authorization to add 3 additional piles and 24 feet of soldier pile wall at City expense to the 112 feet to fully protect the slope. One additional benefit will be a 3-4 foot area for pedestrians. The cost is approximately $35,000 - $36,000; it will be paid by the Stormwater Utility. Council President Petso observed the cost identified in the Council packet was $30,000 but the request is $36,000. Mr. Williams explained costs will be $19,422 for drilling, $10,000 for excavation/back fill, $1500 for the project manager, and applicable taxes. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO APPROVE $36,000 FOR THE ADDITIONAL 24 FEET OR 3 PILINGS FOR THE 190Ta PLACE SW RETAINING WALL. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 10, 2013 Page 3 Packet Page 6 of 895 Councilmember Bloom asked why this would be paid out of Stormwater Utility. Mr. Williams responded a major rainfall event caused this damage to the slope, probably due to lack of adequate drainage. It is the only logical place to fund the project. THE VOTE ON THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling thanked Council President Petso for chairing last week's meeting. He referred to the discussion at last week's meeting regarding the meaning of a veto in the democratic process and that the veto interfered with the democratic process. He explained by law the legislative body makes the decision; the Mayor has an opportunity to accept or reject an ordinance and the Council has the right to override the veto; that is the democratic process. He viewed a veto as part of the process as the Council has the right to override the veto. To the comment that he has vetoed 3 times in the last 1t/2 years, he pointed out he has approved hundreds of others. Mayor Earling wished Councilmember Yamamoto the very best tomorrow. 7. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Bloom reported she attended the Port Commission meeting last night. On behalf of the Port, she provided a reminder of Sea Jazz performances, the last one will be on Sunday, September 15 from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. in the Port's public plaza. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas expressed appreciation to Mayor Earling for addressing her comments regarding his veto. She suggested they agree to disagree. Councilmember Johnson wished Councilmember Yamamoto good luck and a speedy recovery. Councilmember Buckshnis reported the car show was wonderful. To Ms. Breske, Councilmember Buckshnis said she and Councilmember Bloom have also asked for an answer to her questions. Councilmember Peterson invited everyone to participate in a remembrance of 9/11 at the 5`h & Main fountain at 7:10 a.m. tomorrow where Officer Dawson will play Taps. The International Association of Fire Firefighters will host a ceremony at 7:30 a.m. at the Fallen Firefighter Memorial Park north of Fire Station 17. 8. ADJOURN TO CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned to Council committee meetings at 6:28 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes September 10, 2013 Page 4 Packet Page 7 of 895 AM-6111 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: Consent Submitted For: Roger Neumaier Department: Finance Review Committee: Type: Action T. T ..w...4.. Submitted By: 4. B. Nori Jacobson Committee Action: Approve for Consent Agenda Subject Title Approval of claim checks #204215 through #204359 dated September 12, 2013 for $1,007,587.92. Recommendation Approval of claim checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Fiscal Year: 2013 Revenue: Expenditure: 1,007,587.92 Fiscal Impact: Claims $1,007,587.92 Claim checks 09-12-13 Proiect Numbers 09-12-13 Inbox Reviewed By Finance Roger Neumaier City Clerk Sandy Chase Mayor Dave Earling Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase Fiscal Impact Attachments Form Review Date 09/12/2013 09:15 AM 09/12/2013 09:23 AM 09/12/2013 10:17 AM 09/12/2013 01:57 PM Packet Page 8 of 895 Form Started By: Nori Jacobson Final Approval Date: 09/12/2013 Started On: 09/12/2013 09:03 AM Packet Page 9 of 895 vchlist 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: 1 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204215 9/12/2013 041695 3M XAM3522 SS26673 Traffic Control - Tomato Red 30"x50 � Traffic Control - Tomato Red 30"x50 N 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 183.75 Kelly Green Scotchcal Electrocut Filrr 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 183.75 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 34.92 SS26674 Traffic Control - White High Intensity Traffic Control - White High Intensity 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 472.50 Protective Overlay Film 30"x50Yd 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 483.75 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 90.85 SS28041 Traffic Control - Eng Grade Workzone Traffic Control - Eng Grade Workzone 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 356.25 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 33.85 Total: 1,839.62 204216 9/12/2013 072627 911 ETC INC 24612 MONTHLY 911 DATABASE MAINT Monthly 911 database maint 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 100.00 Total: 100.00 204217 9/12/2013 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 323441 PEST CONTROL MEADOWDALE CL PEST CONTROL MEADOWDALE CL 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 75.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 7.12 323466 PEST CONTROL SENIOR CENTER PEST CONTROL SENIOR CENTER 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 105.00 9.5% Sales Tax Page: 1 Packet Page 10 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204217 9/12/2013 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 9.98 Total: 197.10 204218 9/12/2013 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 9382 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl- 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 177,731.41 Total: 177,731.41 204219 9/12/2013 074488 ALPHA COURIER INC INV 9042013 WWTP - COURIER SERVICE TO RA WWTP - COURIER SERVICE TO RA 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 207.61 Total: 207.61 204220 9/12/2013 068857 AMEC EARTH & ENVIRONMENTAL INC K09581706 Perrinville Creek 2013-1 - Fish Perrinville Creek 2013-1 - Fish 422.000.72.531.40.41.00 2,097.40 Total: 2,097.40 204221 9/12/2013 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 655-6998967 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 31.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 2.97 Total: 34.22 204222 9/12/2013 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 655-6939945 WWTP UNIFORMS, TOWELS, & MA WWTP UNIFORMS 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 1.14 WWTP TOWELS & MATS 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 56.32 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.11 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 5.35 655-6939947 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS Page: 2 Packet Page 11 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 204222 9/12/2013 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 18.55 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.76 655-6944302 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 655-6944303 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.14 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.56 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.49 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 655-6951722 WWTP UNIFORMS, TOWELS, & MA WWTP UNIFORMS 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 1.14 WWTP TOWELS & MATS 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 55.77 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.11 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 5.30 655-6951724 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 18.55 Page: 3 Packet Page 12 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204222 9/12/2013 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.76 655-6956175 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 001.000.65.519.91.41.00 1.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.09 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.519.91.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 655-6956176 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 Page: 4 Packet Page 13 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204222 9/12/2013 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 655-6956177 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.14 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.71 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.49 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.73 655-6963464 WWTP UNIFORMS, TOWELS, & MA WWTP UNIFORMS 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 1.14 WWTP TOWELS & MATS 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 56.57 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.11 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 5.37 655-6963466 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 18.55 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.76 655-6967857 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 001.000.65.519.91.41.00 1.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.07 Page: 5 Packet Page 14 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 204222 9/12/2013 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.09 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.519.91.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 655-6967858 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 655-6967859 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.14 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.66 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.49 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.73 Page: 6 Packet Page 15 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 204222 9/12/2013 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 655-6975354 WWTP UNIFORMS, TOWELS, & MA WWTP UNIFORMS 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 1.14 WWTP TOWELS & MATS 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 56.82 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.11 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 5.40 655-6975356 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 18.55 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.76 655-6979795 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 001.000.65.519.91.41.00 1.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATE 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.07 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.07 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.519.91.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax Page: 7 Packet Page 16 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204222 9/12/2013 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES (Continued) 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.39 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MAT: 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.09 655-6979796 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 10.21 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFOR 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 10.20 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.97 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.97 655-6979797 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.14 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.56 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.49 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 Total: 514.69 204223 9/12/2013 064343 AT&T 425-776-5316 PARKS FAX MODEM PARKS FAX MODEM 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 51.16 Total: 51.16 204224 9/12/2013 074506 ATLAS SALES & RENTALS INC 83706-0006 COOLING SYSTEM RENTAL Cooling system rental 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 295.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 28.03 Page: 8 Packet Page 17 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204224 9/12/2013 074506 074506 ATLAS SALES & RENTALS INC (Continued) Total: 323.03 204225 9/12/2013 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 70919 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 89.16 UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 89.16 UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 91.86 UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 307.75 UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 307.75 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 8.47 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 8.47 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 8.73 Total: 911.35 204226 9/12/2013 001835 AWARDS SERVICE INC 81254 NAME BADGE EAC NAME BADGE EAC 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 8.75 Freight 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 3.69 9.5% Sales Tax 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 1.19 Total: 13.63 204227 9/12/2013 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0813 PRE -EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND Pre -employment background checks 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 80.00 Total: 80.00 204228 9/12/2013 074571 BALLARD KAYAK EXPEDITIONS BALLARD KAYAKS 17808 BEYOND THE BEACHES 17808 Page: 9 Packet Page 18 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204228 9/12/2013 074571 BALLARD KAYAK EXPEDITIONS (Continued) BEYOND THE BEACHES 17808 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 759.85 Total: 759.85 204229 9/12/2013 002170 BARTON, RONALD 82 LEOFF Reimbursement LEOFF Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.37.23.00 768.69 Total: 768.69 204230 9/12/2013 065257 BEYETTE, PAM 5 E6MA.COMPLETION OF 7 LANTERP E6MA.Completion of 7 Lanterns, Arm 129.000.24.595.70.41.00 8,000.00 Total: 8,000.00 204231 9/12/2013 070803 BITCO SOFTWARE LLC 523 Annual Implementation Services. Annual Implementation Services. 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 6,000.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 570.00 Total: 6,570.00 204232 9/12/2013 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 7474 E3JA/E3JB/E1JB.CONSTRUCTION / E3JA/E3JB/E1JB.Construction Admir 421.000.74.594.34.41.10 15,550.75 Total: 15,550.75 204233 9/12/2013 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 13821 INV#13821 - EDMONDS PD - CLARH S/S UNIFORM SHIRT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 67.95 SEW NAME NAME TAG ON SHIRT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 1.00 L/S UNIFORM SHIRT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 89.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 15.10 Page: 10 Packet Page 19 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 11 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204233 9/12/2013 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP (Continued) 14216 INV#14216 - EDMONDS PD - VAN D, HEM PANTS - COGS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.50 SEW NAME TAGS ON COGS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 1.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 0.71 17292-01 INV#17292-01 -EDMONDS PD - MC BLACK PANTS (DETECTIVE) 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 69.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 6.65 17412 INV#17412 - EDMONDS PD - CLARH HEM PANTS - COGS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 5.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 0.48 21633 INV#21633 - EDMONDS PD - MC CL TACTICAL HARNESS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 36.95 BELT KEEPERS/D RING 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 20.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 5.50 21926 INV#21926 - EDMONDS PD - CRYSI MENS BLACK KINETIC BOOTS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 154.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 14.72 Total: 497.40 204234 9/12/2013 074442 CAPITAL ONE 8941 Fac Maint - Blocks, Mr Clean Erasers Fac Maint - Blocks, Mr Clean Erasers 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 299.94 PW - Soaps and Supplies Page: 11 Packet Page 20 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 12 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204234 9/12/2013 074442 CAPITAL ONE (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.75 PW - Soaps and Supplies 001.000.65.519.91.31.00 3.25 PW - Soaps and Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 13.00 PW - Soaps and Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 13.00 PW - Soaps and Supplies 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 13.00 PW - Soaps and Supplies 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 12.99 Total: 364.93 204235 9/12/2013 068484 CEMEX LLC 9426882885 Roadway - Asphalt 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 48.93 Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 515.00 Total: 563.93 204236 9/12/2013 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY RN08130972 HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS HELIUM FOR GYMNASTICS 001.000.64.575.55.45.00 11.75 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.575.55.45.00 1.12 Total: 12.87 204237 9/12/2013 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 197801 WWTP - ARGON WWTP - ARGON 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 51.20 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 4.87 RN08130973 WWTP - CYLINDER RENTAL WWTP - CYLINDER RENTAL 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 58.00 Page: 12 Packet Page 21 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204237 9/12/2013 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 5.51 Total: 119.58 204238 9/12/2013 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 10270 WWTP - M&O, SEWER WWTP - M&O, SEWER 423.000.76.535.80.47.00 27,602.00 Total: 27,602.00 204239 9/12/2013 074559 CLARK, PATRICK CLARK EXP CLAIM PATRICK CLARK EXPENSE CLAIM - MEDICAL IMAGING NW - PRE -HIRE 001.000.22.521.10.41.00 138.00 AMAZON - WRESTLING SHOES FO 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 57.95 SPORTS AUTHORITY - GRAPPLING 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 28.73 Total: 224.68 204240 9/12/2013 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2588693 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1,830.59 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 173.91 Total: 2,004.50 204241 9/12/2013 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2588858 Fac Maint - Cleaner, Bleach, Filters, Fac Maint - Cleaner, Bleach, Filters, 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 592.77 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 56.31 Total: 649.08 204242 9/12/2013 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC SEPT-13 C/A CITYOFED00001 Sept-13 Fiber Optics Internet Connec 001.000.31.518.87.42.00 406.00 Page: 13 Packet Page 22 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204242 9/12/2013 073135 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC (Continued) Total: 406.00 204243 9/12/2013 068358 COLUMBIA CASCADE COMPANY 48314-82 3 MAIN STREET BENCHES AND Pll` 3 MAIN STREET BENCHES AND Pll` 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 6,300.00 Freight 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 450.00 9.5% Sales Tax 127.000.64.575.50.31.00 641.25 Total: 7,391.25 204244 9/12/2013 062891 COOK PAGING WA 9168303 INVOICE # WATER WATCH PAGERS 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 4.25 Total: 4.25 204245 9/12/2013 072848 COPIERS NW INV916302 INV#INV916302 ACCT#HMH636 - E[ MO COPIER RENTAL 08/05 - 09/04/ 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 226.77 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 21.54 INV916303 INV#INV916303 ACCT#HMH636 - E[ BLACK COPIES 08/05 TO 09/04/13 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 52.43 COLOR COPIES 08/05 TO 09/04/13 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 112.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 15.70 Total: 429.24 204246 9/12/2013 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING AUG 2013 DRY CLEANING JULY/AUG - EDMOI CLEANING/LAUNDRY JULY/AUG 20 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 1,123.35 Total: 1,123.35 204247 9/12/2013 069529 D & G BACKHOE INC E3JA.Pmt 4 E3JA.PAYMENT 4 THRU 8/30/13 Page: 14 Packet Page 23 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 15 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204247 9/12/2013 069529 D & G BACKHOE INC (Continued) E3JA.Payment 4 thru 8/30/13 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 66,795.69 E3JA.Retainage 4 421.000.223.400 -3,050.03 Total: 63,745.66 204248 9/12/2013 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03 342132 INV#342132 - EDMONDS PD CALIBRATE RADAR SHD-02475 (NE 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 70.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 6.65 Total: 76.65 204249 9/12/2013 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2013080226 CUSTOMER ID# D200-0 Scan Services for August 2013 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 940.00 Total: 940.00 204250 9/12/2013 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 13-3389 MINUTE TAKING 9/3 City Council Minutes 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 306.00 Total: 306.00 204251 9/12/2013 074554 DOMINGUEZ, EDWARD 09072013 BIRD FEST PRESENTATION FEE 2013 Bird Fest presentation fee 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 50.00 Total: 50.00 204252 9/12/2013 007253 DUNN LUMBER 2055648 GREENHOUSE TARPS GREENHOUSE TARPS 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 90.24 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 8.58 2065165 POLARIS TEMPTEST JACKET POLARIS TEMPTEST JACKET Page: 15 Packet Page 24 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 16 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204252 9/12/2013 007253 DUNN LUMBER (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 64.30 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 6.11 2066445 BALLINGER PARK BALLINGER PARK 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 33.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 3.23 Total: 206.44 204253 9/12/2013 074302 EDMONDS HARDWARE & PAINT LLC 2013-09-09 ROPE ROPE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.95 Total: 10.94 204254 9/12/2013 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP ANDREW GIFFORD 17744 ANDREW GIFFORD ZUMBATONIC 1 ANDREW GIFFORD ZUMBATONIC 1 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 45.00 GIFFORD 17744 GIFFORD ZUMBATONIC 17744 GIFFORD ZUMBATONIC 17744 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 45.00 MARTIENEZ 17652 ATHENA MARTINEZ GYMNASTICS' ATHENA MARTINEZ GYMNASTICS' 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 75.00 Total: 165.00 204255 9/12/2013 038500 EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER 2013-09-01 09/13 RECREATION SERVICES COI` 09/13 Recreation Services Contract F 001.000.39.555.00.41.00 5,000.00 Total: 5,000.00 204256 9/12/2013 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 5-10351 23823 76TH AVE W 23823 76TH AVE W Page: 16 Packet Page 25 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204256 9/12/2013 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 59.09 Total: 59.09 204257 9/12/2013 068803 EJ USA INC 3601991 Storm - Vaned Locking Grates Storm - Vaned Locking Grates 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 1,220.76 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 115.98 Total: 1,336.74 204258 9/12/2013 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 090931 CUST# MK5533 C5051 GQM52286 C Meter charges 07/30/13 - 08/30/13 Bt 001.000.31.514.23.48.00 79.77 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.48.00 7.58 091070 ZSYST MK0315 PRINTER MAINTEN Maintenance excess for printers 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 78.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 7.46 Total: 173.31 204259 9/12/2013 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 091207 COPIER CHARGES FOR C1030 Copier charges fo C1030 001.000.61.519.70.45.00 7.16 Copier charges fo C1030 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 7.16 Copier charges fo C1030 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 7.14 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.61.519.70.45.00 0.68 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 0.68 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 0.68 Page: 17 Packet Page 26 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 18 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204259 9/12/2013 008812 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINE: (Continued) Total: 23.50 204260 9/12/2013 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 091204 1 Meter charge for Planning Dept. C10: Meter charge for Planning Dept. C10: 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 16.83 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 1.60 0912051 Meter charges for Building Div. C103( Meter charges for Building Div. C103( 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 25.41 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 2.41 Total: 46.25 204261 9/12/2013 068796 ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECH INT'L 13387 WWTP-PRETREATMENT TOOLS, f WWTP - PRETREATMENT TOOLS, f 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 699.90 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 77.26 Tota I : 777.16 204262 9/12/2013 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC 25286 BALLINGER PARK GATE POSTS BALLINGER PARK GATE POSTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 429.32 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 40.79 25287 BALLINGER PARK HAND RAILS BALLINGER PARK HAND RAILS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 238.36 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 22.64 Total: 731.11 204263 9/12/2013 072827 EVERGREEN CONCRETE CUTTING 22193 Water - 24310 75th Asphalt Cutting Water - 24310 75th Asphalt Cutting 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 713.00 Page: 18 Packet Page 27 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 19 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204263 9/12/2013 072827 EVERGREEN CONCRETE CUTTING (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 67.74 Total: 780.74 204264 9/12/2013 067599 EWING ELECTRIC INC EPD1002 WWTP - SWITCHGEAR PROJECT WWTP - SWITCHGEAR PROJECT 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 205,830.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 19,553.85 Total: 225,383.85 204265 9/12/2013 065958 EZ-LINER 050710 Unit 46 - Tank Bead Gasket and PMP Unit 46 - Tank Bead Gasket and PMP 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 470.00 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 14.95 051649 Unit 46 - PMP Jet Returned (minus 2( Unit 46 - PMP Jet Returned (minus 2( 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -316.00 Total: 168.95 204266 9/12/2013 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0391251 Meter Inventory - M-Meteromni-01.5-: Meter Inventory - M-Meteromni-01.5-<' 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,281.74 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 121.77 0391254 Meter Inventory - M-Meteromni-01.5-( Meter Inventory - M-Meteromni-01.5-( 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,281.74 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 121.77 0391453 Meter Inventory - M-Meteromni-01.5-( Meter Inventory - M-Meteromni-01.5-( 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,281.74 9.5% Sales Tax Page: 19 Packet Page 28 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 20 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204266 9/12/2013 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 121.77 0391455 Meter Inventory - M-Meter-02-010 #2( Meter Inventory - M-Meter-02-010 #2( 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,478.93 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 140.50 0391548 Water Meter Inventory - Water Meter Inventory - 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,179.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 112.01 Total: 7,120.97 204267 9/12/2013 067004 FINE LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS 23384-00 WWTP - UPGRADE DIFFERENTIAL WWTP - UPGRADE DIFFERENTIAL 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 1,675.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 31.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 162.07 Total: 1,868.07 204268 9/12/2013 072453 FIRST CLASS CARPET SERVICE 1746 GYMNASTICS ROOM CARPET CLE) GYMNASTICS ROOM CARPET CLEj 001.000.64.575.55.41.00 245.00 Total: 245.00 204269 9/12/2013 069469 FLINT TRADING INC 160669 Traffic Control - Q60' VG 6" White Lin Traffic Control - Q60' VG 6" White Lin 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1,425.60 Q30' VG 12" White Line 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 7,611.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 858.48 Page: 20 Packet Page 29 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 21 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204269 9/12/2013 069469 069469 FLINTTRADING INC (Continued) Total: 9,895.08 204270 9/12/2013 011900 FRONTIER 425-744-1681 SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODE SEAVIEW PARK IRRIGATION MODE 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 42.51 425-744-1691 SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM SIERRA PARK IRRIGATION MODEM 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 41.85 425-776-5316 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MO GROUNDS MAINTENANCE FAX MO 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 112.63 Tota I : 196.99 204271 9/12/2013 011900 FRONTIER 253-012-9189 WWTP AUTO DIALER- 1 VOICE GR WWTP AUTO DIALER- 1 VOICE GR 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 41.08 253-017-7256 W WTP TELEMETRY - 8 VOICEGRAI W WTP TELEMETRY - 8 VOICEGRAI 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 217.18 425-771-5553 WWTP AUTO DIALER- 1 BUSINES: WWTP AUTO DIALER- 1 BUSINES: 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 98.62 Total: 356.88 204272 9/12/2013 011900 FRONTIER 206-188-0247 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY A, TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 413.45 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 413.44 253-003-6887 POINT EDWARDS CIRCUIT LINE SF POINT EDWARDS CIRCUIT LINE SF 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 41.67 253-020-6656 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 21.95 425-774-1031 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCI Page: 21 Packet Page 30 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 22 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204272 9/12/2013 011900 FRONTIER (Continued) LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRAI 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 46.84 425-776-1281 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PH( 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 42.51 425-776-2742 LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACC 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.02 425-776-6829 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH P CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION AI 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 113.16 Total: 1,119.04 204273 9/12/2013 073922 GAVIOLA, NIKKA GAVIOLA 16883 TAEKWON-DO 16883 TAEKWON-DO 16883 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 166.00 TAEKWON-DO 16895 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 118.50 Total: 284.50 204274 9/12/2013 074573 GERALD & LINDA REEDER 5-07950 #40121126-805-CR3 UTILTIY REFU� #40121126-805-CR3 Utiltiy refund du 411.000.233.000 45.14 Total: 45.14 204275 9/12/2013 072515 GOOGLE INC 7301042 C/A#396392 MESSAGE DISCOVER' Internet Anti -Virus & Spam Maint Fee 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 367.00 Total: 367.00 204276 9/12/2013 012199 GRAINGER 9221975536 Water - Pipe Sealant and Lubricant Water - Pipe Sealant and Lubricant 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 99.30 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.44 Page: 22 Packet Page 31 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 23 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204276 9/12/2013 012199 GRAINGER (Continued) 9228250933 Water - Wire Cloth Supplies Water - Wire Cloth Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 17.39 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.66 9228421245 PS - (10) Fuses PS - (10) Fuses 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 91.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.73 Total: 228.32 204277 9/12/2013 072900 GUTTMAN, BURTON C 09072013 BIRD FEST PRESENTATION FEE 2013 Bird Fest presentation fee 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 75.00 Total: 75.00 204278 9/12/2013 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 41771 WWTP - OPERATING SUPPLIES. LII WWTP - OPERATING SUPPLIES. LII 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 421.89 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 40.08 5038680 WWTP - GAS CAN, SILICONE WWTP - GAS CAN, SILICONE 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 66.31 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 6.30 62747 WWTP - MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES WWTP - MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 170.88 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 16.23 Tota I : 721.69 204279 9/12/2013 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2331299 WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES Page: 23 Packet Page 32 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 24 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204279 9/12/2013 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED (Continued) WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 52.38 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 4.98 2332628 WWTP - PARTITIONS FOR WWTP - PARTITIONS FOR 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 1,120.75 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 106.49 2333387 WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 49.82 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 4.73 Total: 1,339.15 204280 9/12/2013 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2328632 Keyboard drawer for Pat. Keyboard drawer for Pat. 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 49.69 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 4.72 2331484 Disposable S & P. Disposable S & P. 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 5.72 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 0.54 2332096 Misc. office supplies including copy Misc. office supplies including copy 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 200.02 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 19.00 Total: 279.69 204281 9/12/2013 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 472035 Unit 134 - Battery Unit 134 - Battery Page: 24 Packet Page 33 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 25 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204281 9/12/2013 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS (Continued) 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 107.95 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.26 486068 Unit 134 - Battery Unit 134 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 107.95 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.26 726971 Fleet Shop Supplies Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 40.76 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 3.87 Total: 281.05 204282 9/12/2013 070902 KAREN ULVESTAD PHOTOGRAPHY 09072013 BIRD FEST PRESENTATION FEE 2013 Bird Fest presentation fee 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 100.00 Total: 100.00 204283 9/12/2013 074326 KIMBALL MIDWEST 2998143 WWTP - TROUBLE LIGHT WWTP - TROUBLE LIGHT 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 178.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 16.91 3015270 WWTP - SS SCREWS WWTP - SS SCREWS 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 95.55 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 9.08 3041825 WWTP - DRILL SET, BIT SET 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 93.72 WWTP - DRILL SET, BIT SET 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 986.52 Page: 25 Packet Page 34 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 26 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204283 9/12/2013 074326 KIMBALL MIDWEST (Continued) 3148550 WWTP - WASHERS, HEX NUTS WWTP - WASHERS, HEX NUTS 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 162.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 15.39 Total: 1,557.17 204284 9/12/2013 068024 KRUCKEBERG BOTANIC GARD FOUND KRUCKEBERG 17793 BIRDS OF KRUCKEBERG 17793 BIRDS OF KRUCKEBERG 17793 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 71.50 Total: 71.50 204285 9/12/2013 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 395106-001 HAWKINS.PEN REFILLS Hawkins.Pen Refills 001.000.67.532.20.49.00 26.06 Total: 26.06 204286 9/12/2013 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 08032013-01 INV#08032013-01 - EDMONDS PD 30 CAR WASHES @ $5.03 (INCTX) 1 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 150.90 Total: 150.90 204287 9/12/2013 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 686860 Fleet Supplies Fleet Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 7.55 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 0.72 686969 Unit 57 - Hydraulic Filter Unit 57 - Hydraulic Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 7.01 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.67 686989 Unit 57 - Air Filter Unit 57 - Air Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.94 Page: 26 Packet Page 35 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 27 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204287 9/12/2013 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.94 687254 Unit 22 - Fuel Filter, Hydraulic Filter Unit 22 - Fuel Filter, Hydraulic Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 55.72 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.29 687255 Unit 22 - Fuel Filter Returned Unit 22 - Fuel Filter Returned 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -12.37 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -1.18 687316 Unit 13 - Oil Unit 13 - Oil 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.66 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.92 687604 Unit 14 - Oil Filter Unit 14 - Oil Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 27.32 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.60 687696 Unit 138 - Air, Oil And Fuel Filters Unit 138 - Air, Oil And Fuel Filters 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 72.08 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.85 687704 Unit 83 - Supplies Unit 83 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.45 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.33 Tota I : 197.50 204288 9/12/2013 066191 MACLEOD RECKORD 6733 CITY PARK SPRAY PARK REVITAL12 Page: 27 Packet Page 36 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 28 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204288 9/12/2013 066191 MACLEOD RECKORD (Continued) CITY PARK SPRAY PARK REVITAL12 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 4,340.01 Total: 4,340.01 204289 9/12/2013 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 58781554 WWTP - REPLACE, HIGH -FLOW PL WWTP- REPLACE, HIGH -FLOW PL 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 653.58 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 88.51 Total: 742.09 204290 9/12/2013 063773 MICROFLEX 00021455 TAXTOOLS ANNUAL MAINT & SUPP Taxtools Annual Maintenance & Supp 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 918.44 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 87.25 Total: 1,005.69 204291 9/12/2013 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC 173578 WWTP - PROPANE WWTP - PROPANE 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 57.24 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 5.44 Total: 62.68 204292 9/12/2013 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0503730-IN Fleet Filter Inventory Fleet Filter Inventory 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 75.93 Fleet Filters for Vehicles 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 107.29 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 7.22 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.19 Page: 28 Packet Page 37 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 29 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204292 9/12/2013 024302 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM (Continued) Total: 200.63 204293 9/12/2013 074553 NIGHTINGALE, TERRENCE 09072013 2013 Bird Fest presentation fee 2013 Bird Fest presentation fee 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 50.00 Total: 50.00 204294 9/12/2013 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 44710 WWTP - BISULFITE WWTP - BISULFITE 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 972.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 92.38 Total: 1,064.78 204295 9/12/2013 071245 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC E9FB.Ret Release NWA E9FB.RETAINAGE RELEASE - NOR- E9FB.Retainage Release - Northwest 422.000.223.400 2,913.03 Total: 2,913.03 204296 9/12/2013 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-737048 RENTALS HICKMAN PARK RENTAL; RENTALS HICKMAN PARK RENTAL; 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 587.88 1-739628 RENTALS MATHAY/BALLINGER RENTALS MATHAY/BALLINGER 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 184.77 Total: 772.65 204297 9/12/2013 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 408 Planning Board minutes for 8/28/13. Planning Board minutes for 8/28/13. 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 432.00 Total: 432.00 204298 9/12/2013 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 155123 PAPER, PLANNER SUPPLIES PAPER, PLANNER SUPPLIES 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 61.48 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 5.84 Page: 29 Packet Page 38 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 30 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204298 9/12/2013 063511 OFFICE MAX INC (Continued) 190305 CARD STOCK CARD STOCK 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 10.48 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 0.99 Total: 78.79 204299 9/12/2013 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 105614 INV#105614 ACCT#520437 520POL 9X12 ENVELOPES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 52.93 1OX13 ENVELOPES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 37.83 FILE CABINET POCKETS -EXPAND 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 34.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 11.93 Total: 137.49 204300 9/12/2013 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 081503 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 384.66 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 36.54 Total: 421.20 204301 9/12/2013 073751 OKANOGAN COUNTRY SHERIFF AUG 2013 OKC JAIL INMATE HOUSING - CITY OF EDMO 62 INMATE HOUSING DAYS - AUG 2 001.000.41.523.60.51.00 3,317.00 Total: 3,317.00 204302 9/12/2013 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130 220TH ST SW AND 84TH AVE W 220TH ST SW AND 84TH AVE W 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 14.06 00001520 820 15TH ST SW 820 15TH ST SW Page: 30 Packet Page 39 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 31 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204302 9/12/2013 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT (Continued) 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 36.68 0001530 820 15TH ST SW 820 15TH ST SW 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 237.39 0002930 5TH AND RTE 104 SPRINKLER 5TH AND RTE 104 SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 37.90 0005060 9803 EDMONDS WAY 9803 EDMONDS WAY 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 15.57 0026390 SIDEWALK NEAR 10415 226TH PL SIDEWALK NEAR 10415 226TH PL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 15.57 Total: 357.17 204303 9/12/2013 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0021400 FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 173.47 Total: 173.47 204304 9/12/2013 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 5408 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST POOL SUPPLIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 190.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 18.10 Total: 208.60 204305 9/12/2013 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC. 954023039647 MCH - Paint supplies MCH - Paint supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.59 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.72 Total: 8.31 204306 9/12/2013 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 102044 INV#102044 - EDMONDS PD Page: 31 Packet Page 40 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 32 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204306 9/12/2013 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC (Continued) TOW 2001 CADILLAC #AME9738 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 158.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 15.01 Total: 173.01 204307 9/12/2013 074567 PHOENIX THEATRE PHOENIX 2013 PHOENIX TOURISM PROMOTION PHOENIX TOURISM PROMOTION 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 650.00 Total: 650.00 204308 9/12/2013 028400 PITNEY BOWES INC 445965 LETTER OPENER MAINTENANCE 1 Maintenance contract letter opener 001.000.31.514.23.48.00 366.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.48.00 34.77 Total: 400.77 204309 9/12/2013 073546 PITNEY BOWES RESERVE ACCOUNT 090913 POSTAGE FOR CITY METER 250-00307 Postage for City Meter 001.000.25.514.30.42.00 8,000.00 Total: 8,000.00 204310 9/12/2013 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 5619000 WWTP - FUSES WWTP - FUSES 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 410.70 9.5% Sales Tax 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 39.02 Tota I : 449.72 204311 9/12/2013 071594 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT 182418 INV#182418 - EDMONDS PD TSR X26 DIGITAL POWER MAG 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 209.70 TSR X26 EXTENDED DPM 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 159.80 Page: 32 Packet Page 41 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 33 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204311 9/12/2013 071594 PROFORCE LAW ENFORCEMENT (Continued) Freight 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 9.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 36.04 Total: 415.49 204312 9/12/2013 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 ALARM MONITORING MEADOWDAI ALARM MONITORING CLUBHOUSE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 107.10 2422756 ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE ALARM MONITORING SNO-ISLE LIE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 230.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 21.85 Total: 358.95 204313 9/12/2013 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 636.59 Total: 636.59 204314 9/12/2013 030455 PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL 2014027 MEMBERSHIP DUES 2014 Membership Dues 2014 - Economic 001.000.39.519.90.49.00 1,205.00 Membership Dues 2014 001.000.39.519.90.49.00 13,723.00 Total: 14,928.00 204315 9/12/2013 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC INV#000000139166 MARKER MARKER 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 100.00 Total: 100.00 204316 9/12/2013 074156 RAZZ CONSTRUCTION INC E9GA.Pmt 9 E9GA.PAYMENT 9 THRU 8/30/13 E9GA.Payment 9 thru 8/30/13 Page: 33 Packet Page 42 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 34 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204316 9/12/2013 074156 RAZZ CONSTRUCTION INC (Continued) 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 279,631.71 Total: 279,631.71 204317 9/12/2013 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SERVICES 21449 PS - Service Call PS - Service Call 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 216.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 20.54 Total: 236.79 204318 9/12/2013 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0807770 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / RECYCLIN, WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / RECYCLIN, 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 3,759.19 Total: 3,759.19 204319 9/12/2013 006841 RICOH USA INC 5027289128 Additional images on reception copies Additional images on reception copies 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 8.85 Total: 8.85 204320 9/12/2013 070042 RICOH USA INC 90667019 Rent on reception copier MP171 SPF Rent on reception copier MP171 SPF 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 30.66 Total: 30.66 204321 9/12/2013 074162 ROHANI, LORENZO 09072013 BIRD FEST PRESENTATION FEE 2013 Bird Fest presentation fee 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 50.00 Total: 50.00 204322 9/12/2013 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY AUGUST 2013 INVOICE 08/31/13 ACCT#70014 - EE #130572 3 NPC 08/05/13 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 33.96 131560 4 NPC 08/26/13 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 45.28 #131853 4 NPC 08/26/13 Page: 34 Packet Page 43 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 35 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204322 9/12/2013 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY (Continued) 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 45.28 Total: 124.52 204323 9/12/2013 074564 SCHEELE, DARCIE SCHEELE SHOES REIMBURSEMENT FOR UNIFORM f UNIFORM SHOES 001.000.41.521.11.24.00 109.45 Total: 109.45 204324 9/12/2013 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 13-2496 Unit 31 - Aluminum Flanges Unit 31 - Aluminum Flanges 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 283.85 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 26.97 Total: 310.82 204325 9/12/2013 070115 SHANNON & WILSON INC 88923 E3FA.SERVICES THRU 8/10/13 E3FA.Services thru 8/10/13 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 2,275.00 Total: 2,275.00 204326 9/12/2013 068489 SIRENNET.COM 0158099-IN Units EQ77PO &EQ79PO - BLink Fla Units EQ77PO &EQ79PO - BLink Fla 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 504.00 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 16.83 Total: 520.83 204327 9/12/2013 036955 SKY NURSERY 185377 WINTER/FALL FLOWER PROGRAM WINTER/FALL FLOWER PROGRAM 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 184.71 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 17.55 Total: 202.26 204328 9/12/2013 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY SKYHAWKS 16791 SKYHAWKS SPORTS CAMP 16791 SKYHAWKS SPORTS CAMP 16791 Page: 35 Packet Page 44 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 36 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204328 9/12/2013 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY (Continued) 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 451.50 Total: 451.50 204329 9/12/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2006-5085-1 CITY PARK RESTROOMS CITY PARK RESTROOMS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 49.00 2006-5164-4 PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP PARK & MAINTENANCE SHOP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 381.50 2008-6924-6 PLAYFIELD BLEACHERS PLAYFIELD BLEACHERS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 69.93 2013-8327-0 PARK GAZEBO PARK GAZEBO 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 32.33 2014-5305-7 PLAYFIELD LIGHTS PLAYFIELD LIGHTS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 144.50 2021-1448-4 CITY PARK SOUTH RESTROOMS & CITY PARK SOUTH RESTROOMS & 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 97.50 Total: 774.76 204330 9/12/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2025-7952-0 WWTP ENERGY MANAGEMENT SE WWTP ENERGY MANAGEMENT SE 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 8.69 Total: 8.69 204331 9/12/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0291-9 LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AV 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 196.32 2002-7495-9 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 36.86 2004-9315-3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W Page: 36 Packet Page 45 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 37 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204331 9/12/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 47.43 2004-9683-4 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT R 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 88.85 2005-9488-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 73.16 2007-4860-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 32.33 2009-1385-3 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A\ DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND A\ 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 37.48 2011-5142-0 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21506 84- PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21506 84- 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 32.33 2011-8789-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 33.90 2014-2731-7 LIFT STATION 7403 BALLINGER WP LIFT STATION 7403 BALLINGER WP 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 32.33 2014-3123-6 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9110 OLY 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 31.27 2015-0127-7 LIFT STATION #14 7909 1/2 211TH F LIFT STATION #14 7905 1/2 211TH F 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 32.33 2015-3292-6 LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON S- 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 266.67 2017-1178-5 STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 1,406.33 Page: 37 Packet Page 46 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 38 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204331 9/12/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 2020-7719-4 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 967.85 2021-9128-4 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 7801 212' PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 7801 212' 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 32.33 2022-8909-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 97.59 2023-5673-9 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 39.15 2024-9953-9 LIFT STATION #1 105 CASPERS ST LIFT STATION #1 105 CASPERS ST 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 728.25 2025-2918-6 STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 2,439.86 2025-2920-2 STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 4 STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 4 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 113.38 2025-7615-3 STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS C STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS C 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 14,052.74 2025-7948-8 STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 2 STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 329.36 2047-1489-3 STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150' 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 3.32 2047-1492-7 STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 2 STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 73.65 2047-1493-5 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 40 Page: 38 Packet Page 47 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 39 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204331 9/12/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 38.85 2047-1494-3 STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 10 STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 10 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 9.88 2047-1495-0 STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 2 STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 2 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 133.94 2051-8438-5 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / N LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / N 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 25.15 Total: 21,432.89 204332 9/12/2013 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2013-1735 CREDIT ON INV#2013-1735 EDMON 15.50 WORK RELEASE @ $20.00 001.000.41.523.60.51.00 -310.00 31 WORK RELEASE @32.00 001.000.41.523.60.51.00 -992.00 2013-1735 INV#2013-1735 - EDMONDS PD 56.75 BOOKINGS @ $94.95 001.000.41.523.60.51.00 5,388.41 0.5 BOOKING AT $ 94.95 (JONES) 001.000.41.523.60.51.00 47.48 524.17 HOUSING DAYS @ $65.94 001.000.41.523.60.51.00 34,563.77 11 HOUSING DAYS @ $65.94 (JONE 001.000.41.523.60.51.00 725.34 80.5 WORK RELEASE @ $44.31 001.000.41.523.60.51.00 3,566.96 Total: 42,989.96 204333 9/12/2013 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 62912 AUGUST SOLID WASTE FEES AUGUST SOLID WASTE FEES 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,279.00 Total: 1,279.00 Page: 39 Packet Page 48 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 40 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204334 9/12/2013 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER August 2013 Crime Victims Court Remittance Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 789.77 Total: 789.77 204335 9/12/2013 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103584 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / RECYCLIN, WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / RECYCLINi 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 29.95 Total: 29.95 204336 9/12/2013 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 550.68 103585 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 674.47 103586 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 555.23 103588 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 459.89 Total: 2,240.27 204337 9/12/2013 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 2015550-01 Storm - Electical Lockout Tags, Suppl Storm - Electical Lockout Tags, Suppl 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 59.34 Freight 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 8.80 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 6.47 Total: 74.61 204338 9/12/2013 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE 36106 FS 20 - Medic Bay Door Repair FS 20 - Medic Bay Door Repair 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 553.38 Page: 40 Packet Page 49 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 41 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204338 9/12/2013 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE (Continued) 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 52.57 Total: 605.95 204339 9/12/2013 074568 SPROUT DESIGN 090313 POSTCARD DESIGN BID Design of postcard for BID membersh 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 225.00 Total: 225.00 204340 9/12/2013 071585 STERICYCLE INC 3002373521 INV#3002373521 CUST#6076358 - E MINIMUM MONTHLY CHARGE 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 10.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.80.41.00 0.36 Total: 10.36 204341 9/12/2013 074570 STULLER, PAM 09032013 DOMAIN REG, PRINTING, POSTAGE Reimbursement for printing postcards 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 410.87 Total: 410.87 204342 9/12/2013 073792 TERRA COMMUNICATIONS INC 09062013 BIRD FEST KEYNOTE FEE THOR H, 2013 Bird Fest keynote speaker fee fc 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 700.00 Total: 700.00 204343 9/12/2013 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY 1821697 E2GA.SEPAADVERTISMENT E2GA.SEPA Advertisement 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 53.32 Total: 53.32 204344 9/12/2013 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 442818 TOURISM PROMOTIONALAD AND I Promotional ad in 8/29/13 and insert 001.000.61.558.70.44.00 1,140.62 Total: 1,140.62 Page: 41 Packet Page 50 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 42 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204345 9/12/2013 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR US54073 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 178.00 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 16.91 US54537 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING C ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING C 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 48.13 US54628 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING S ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING S 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 14.48 Total: 257.52 204346 9/12/2013 042800 TRI-CITIES SECURITY 20091 Unit G16 - Keys Unit G16 - Keys 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.30 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.50 Total: 5.80 204347 9/12/2013 062693 US BANK 5179 HP COMPUTERS, MONITORS, CAR Provantage LLC - AMPZ01 V APC Sy 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 2,529.63 TigerDirect.com - ASUS VS228H-P 2 001.000.41.521.21.35.00 298.11 Newegg.com - Kingston 8GB 204-pin 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 304.95 Fred Meyer - 15' extension cord & fan 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 26.26 HP - Compaq Elite 8300 USDT PC - ( 001.000.41.521.21.35.00 728.75 HP - Compaq Elite 8300 USDT PC - ( 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 3,643.72 VSN DotGovRegistration - domain na 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 250.00 Experts Exchange - IT Solutions Onlir Page: 42 Packet Page 51 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 43 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 204347 9/12/2013 062693 US BANK Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 12.95 VSN DotGovRegistration - domain na 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 250.00 TigerDirect.com - ASUS VS228H-P 2; 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 684.25 TigerDirect.com - ASUS VS228H-P 2; 001.000.67.532.20.35.00 316.57 Late Payment Charge 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 55.67 US 1 Locksmith Services 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 16.43 5179 HP COMPUTER, MONITORS, CABLI Shopblt.com - BKK8267 Smart Buy Ir 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 133.38 Home Depot - Cables for judge's cam 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 70.05 TigerDirect.com - ASUS VS228H-P 2; 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 314.24 MetrolineDirect.com - Mitel Superset 001.000.67.532.20.35.00 45.95 TigerDirect.com - Network adaptors a 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 80.85 HP - QV997AV Compaq Elite 8300 UI 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 805.42 Newegg.com - HDMI cables and adal 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 27.87 HP - Compaq Elite 8300 USDT PC - c 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 1,299.66 Experts Exchange.com - IT Solutions 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 12.95 TigerDirect.com - ASUS VS228H-P 2; 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 474.14 Newegg.com - HDMI cables 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 79.90 Page: 43 Packet Page 52 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 44 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204347 9/12/2013 062693 US BANK (Continued) Late Payment charge 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 89.61 5179 RETURNED CABLES DP-03K RT Newegg.com - Returned cables DP-0 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 -99.90 Total: 12,451.41 204348 9/12/2013 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WF 0498075-WA Water - DOT Water - DOT 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 70.00 Total: 70.00 204349 9/12/2013 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 3080121 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 73.38 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 73.38 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATI 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 75.59 Total: 222.35 204350 9/12/2013 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9710351376 C/A571242650-0001 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bid Dept 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 157.31 iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk 001.000.25.514.30.42.00 56.05 iPad Cell Service Council 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 260.14 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 131.12 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning De 001.000.62.558.60.42.00 95.02 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Econ Devlpi 001.000.61.519.70.42.00 75.03 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering Page: 44 Packet Page 53 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 45 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 204350 9/12/2013 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount (Continued) 001.000.67.532.20.42.00 359.61 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 91.04 iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 40.01 iPhone/iPad Cell Service IT 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 301.08 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor's Offi 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 85.03 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Dept 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 55.01 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Police Dept 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 852.33 Air cards Police Dept 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 840.25 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 001.000.65.519.91.42.00 45.87 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 13.11 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 45.87 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 13.11 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 13.09 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW St Dept 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 77.55 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/ 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 83.05 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/ 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 83.05 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer Dept 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 95.02 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water Page: 45 Packet Page 54 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 46 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204350 9/12/2013 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 135.03 iPad Cell Service Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 80.02 iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 151.08 9710474276 C/A 742016114-00001 WWTP flow test modem 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 46.90 9710478465 C/A 772540262-00001 Lift Station access - testing 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 15.02 Total: 4,296.80 204351 9/12/2013 072312 VERSATILE MOBILE SYSTEMS INC 0000065723 INV#0000065723 CUST#EDMCIT - E INK ROLLER FOR NW LABEL PRIN- 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 120.00 Freight 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 9.32 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 12.29 Total: 141.61 204352 9/12/2013 069836 VOLT SERVICE GROUP 29731839 WWTP - ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTA WWTP - ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTA 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 518.75 29762582 WWTP - ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTA WWTP - ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTA 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 506.25 Total: 1,025.00 204353 9/12/2013 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 49681 INV#49681 - EDMONDS PD TOW 1996 MUSTANG #AGU5390 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 158.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 15.01 Page: 46 Packet Page 55 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 47 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 204353 9/12/2013 067917 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC (Continued) Total: 173.01 204354 9/12/2013 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 114001584 INV#114001584 EDM301 - EDMOND; BACKGROUND CHECKS AUG 2013 001.000.237.100 115.50 Total: 115.50 204355 9/12/2013 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-9139 TREE REMOVAL TREE REMOVAL 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 850.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 80.75 Total: 930.75 204356 9/12/2013 047960 WEAN, GREG 83 LEOFF Reimbursement LEOFF Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.37.23.00 449.17 Tota I : 449.17 204357 9/12/2013 072634 WHISTLE WORKWEAR 7028 WWTP - JON CLAY, UNIFORM WWTP - JON CLAY, UNIFORM 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 218.62 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 18.80 Total: 237.42 204358 9/12/2013 073018 WILCO-WINFIELD 124615 TURF TURF 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 360.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 34.20 Total: 394.20 204359 9/12/2013 074163 WOODLAND PARK ZOO 09072013 BIRD FEST PRESENTATION FEE 2013 Bird Fest presentation fee 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 290.00 Page: 47 Packet Page 56 of 895 vchlist Voucher List Page: 48 09/12/2013 8:08:22AM City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 204359 9/12/2013 074163 074163 WOODLAND PARK ZOO 145 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 145 Vouchers in this report Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Total Bank total Total vouchers Amount 290.00 1,007,587.92 1, 007, 587.92 Page: 48 Packet Page 57 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Proiect Title Number Number FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 EOLA FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 EOLB General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 ElEA PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 EBMB PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1 FM STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM NPDES m013 E7FG STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1 FD STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1 FF STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) c349 E1 FH STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 EOFC STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c336 E1 FA STM Talbot Road/Perrinville Creek Drainage Improvements c307 E9FB STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 EOAA STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 58 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Proiect Title Number Number STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1 DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA SWR Alder/Dellwood/Beach PI/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB SWR BNSF Double Track Project c300 EBGC SWR City -Wide Sewer Improvements c301 EBGD SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) c298 EBGA SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 EOJA WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA WTR 5th Avenue Overlay Project c399 E2CC WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 EOIA WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK WTR OVD Watermain Improvements c141 E3JB WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 59 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number Protect Title WWTP N/A c385 WWTP Switchgear Upgrade EOAA c329 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade STM EOFC c326 Stormwater GIS Support KWTR EOIA c324 AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements WTR EOJA c363 2010 Waterline Replacement Program OLAr c32 Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project FAC EOLB c332 Senior Center Roof Repairs S ers Roundabout (212th Street Sa@ 84th Avenue W) STIR E1AB c343 2011 Residential Neiahborhood Traffic Calmina 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STIR E1DA c354 Sunset Wal SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM E1 FA c336 SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades STM E1 FF c341 Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects tormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) STM E1 FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives E1 FN rrinville Creek Culvert Replacement SWR E1GA c347 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach PI/224th St. Sewer Replacement Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Upda nowSewer, WTR E1JA c333 2011 Waterline Replacement Program 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with nwood WTR E1JC c345 Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study 1111�PRV Station 11 a Bandon WTR E1JE c340 2012 Waterline Replacement Program E1JK In Street Watermain STIR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update 9th Avenue Improvement Project STIR E2AC c404 Citywide Safety Improvements E2AD Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) WTR E2CA c388 2012 Waterline Overlay Program Pioneer Way Road Repa STIR E2CC c399 5th Ave Overlav Proiect STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Draina SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 60 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Engineering Protect Funding Number STM E2FE SWR E2GB EYA STM E3FB Project Accounting Number Project Title c381 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c382 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c369J&12 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update Am c390 Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c406 1%013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c407 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects E3FC c408 ��reek Stor�v Reduction etrofit S udy STM EYD c409 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) orthstream Pipe Abandonement on Puget Drive SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements dh WTR E3JA c397 2013 Waterline Replacement Program 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) WTR E3JB c141 OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) c245 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Projec STR E6DB c256 Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project General JW6MA R99 Enhancement Progr STR E7AA c265 Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements 228th St. SW Corrido provements STR E7CB c268 Shell Valley Emergency Access Road E7FG PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza ift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from Us 13 - 09/01 /08) SWR E8GC c300 BNSF Double Track Project SWR E8GD City -Wide Sewer Improvements PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c290 Marina Beach Additional Parking STR E9CA c294 2009 Street Overlay Program 26th Street Walkway Project STM E9FB c307 Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design PM E91MA c321 Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 61 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Number Number Project Title WTR c141 E3JB OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) SWR c142 E3GB OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements PM c146 E2DB Interurban Trail General c238 E6MA SR99 Enhancement Program STIR c245 E6DA 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project STIR c256 E6DB Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project STIR c265 E7AA Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements STIR c268 E7CB Shell Valley Emergency Access Road PM c276 E7MA Dayton Street Plaza PM c282 EBMA Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PM c290 EBMB Marina Beach Additional Parking STIR c294 E9CA 2009 Street Overlay Program SWR c298 EBGA Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) SWR c300 EBGC BNSF Double Track Project SWR c301 EBGD City -Wide Sewer Improvements SWR c304 E9GA Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design STM c307 E9FB Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation STIR c312 E9DA 226th Street Walkway Project PM c321 E9MA Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements WTR c324 EOIA AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements STM c326 EOFC Stormwater GIS Support FAC c327 EOLA Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project STIR c329 EOAA 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade FAC c332 EOLB Senior Center Roof Repairs WTR c333 E1JA 2011 Waterline Replacement Program STM c336 E1 FA SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements STM c339 E1 FD Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades WTR c340 E1JE 2012 Waterline Replacement Program STM c341 E1 FF Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects STR c342 E1AA Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STIR c343 E1AB 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming WTR c344 E1JB 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood WTR c345 E1JC Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 62 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Number Number Project Title WTR c346 E1JD PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment SWR c347 E1GA 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach PI/224th St. Sewer Replacement STM c349 E1 FH Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) STIR c354 E1 DA Sunset Walkway Improvements WTR c363 EOJA 2010 Waterline Replacement Program STIR c368 E1CA 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements SWR c369 E2GA 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update WTR c370 E1GB Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update General c372 ElEA SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM c374 E1 FM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives WTR c375 E1JK Main Street Watermain STM c376 E1 FN Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM c378 E21FA North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM c379 E2FB SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM c380 E2FC Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STM c381 E2FD Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 STM c382 E21FE 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements WWTP c385 N/A WWTP Switchgear Upgrade WTR c388 E2CA 2012 Waterline Overlay Program WTR c389 E2CB Pioneer Way Road Repair SWR c390 E2GB Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation STIR c391 E2AA Transportation Plan Update STIR c392 E2AB 9th Avenue Improvement Project WTR c397 E3JA 2013 Waterline Replacement Program SWR c398 E3GA 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STIR c399 E2CC 5th Ave Overlay Project STIR c404 E2AC Citywide Safety Improvements STIR c405 E2AD Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM c406 EYA 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement STM c407 E3FB 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects STM c408 E3FC Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM c409 E3FD Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM c410 E31FE Northstream Pipe Abandonement on Puget Drive WTR c418 E3JB 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 63 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Number Number STIR i005 E7AC STM m013 E7FG Project Title 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements NPDES Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 64 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 EOAA STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 EOJA STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA SWR 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach PI/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE STM 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c406 EYA STM 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects c407 E3FB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) c418 E3JB STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 ElCA WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation c390 E2GB WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 EOIA SWR BNSF Double Track Project c300 EBGC STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB STR Citywide Safety Improvements c404 E2AC SWR City -Wide Sewer Improvements c301 EBGD STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1 FM PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) c409 E3FD WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 EOLA Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 65 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Project Engineering Accounting Project Funding Project Title Number Number STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) c342 E1AA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 EBMA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) c405 E2AD PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) c298 EBGA STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 EBMB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E21FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonement on Puget Drive c410 EYE STM NPDES m013 E7FG SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB WTR OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) c141 E3JB STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1 FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E31FC WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1 FD PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 EOLB SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 ElEA General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1 FF STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) c349 E1 FH STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 EOFC STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c336 E1 FA WWTP WWTP Switchgear Upgrade c385 N/A STM Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation c307 E9FB Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 66 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Proiect Title STIR Transportation Plan Update Project Engineering Accounting Project Number Number c391 E2AA Revised 9/12/2013 Packet Page 67 of 895 PROJECT NUMBERS (Phase and Task Numbers) Phases and Tasks (Enaineerina Division Phase Title ct Construction ds Design pl Preliminary sa Site Acquisition & Prep st Study ro Right -of -Way Task Title 196 Traffic Engineering & Studies 197 MAIT 198 CTR 199 Engineering Plans & Services 950 Engineering Staff Time 970 Construction Management 981 Contract 990 Miscellaneous 991 Retainage stm Engineering Staff Time -Storm str Engineering Staff Time -Street swr Engineering Staff Time -Sewer wtr Engineering Staff Time -Water prk Engineering Staff Time -Park Packet Page 68 of 895 AM-6079 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: Consent Submitted By: Linda Hynd Department: Review Committee: Type: City Clerk's Office Action Information Committee Action: 4. C. Subject Title Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Mike McCausland (amount undetermined), Jon Hie ($20,000.00), Clifford and Marie Hackney (amount undetermined), Carole and Merlin Kleven (amount undetermined), Jodi Sackville ($500,000.00), and Frontier (amount undetermined). Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages by minute entry. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Mike McCausland 7038 7th Avenue N.W. Seattle, WA 98117 (amount undetermined) Jon H. Hie 708 Birch Street Edmonds, WA 98020 ($20,000.00) Clifford and Marie Hackney 631 Maple Street Edmonds, WA 98020 (amount undetermined) Carole and Merlin Kleven 635 Pine Street Edmonds, WA 98020 (amount undetermined) Jodi Sackville 19102 20th Drive SE #B101 Packet Page 69 of 895 Bothell, WA 98012 ($500,000.00) Frontier CMR Claims Department P.O, Box 60770 Oklahoma City, OK 73146-0770 (amount undetermined) McCausland Claim for Damages Kleven Claim for Damages Hackney Claim for Damages Hie Claim for Damages Sackville Claim for Damages Frontier Claim for Damages Inbox Mayor Finalize for Agenda Form Started By: Linda Hynd Final Approval Date: 09/11/2013 Attachments Form Review Reviewed By Date Dave Earling 09/11/2013 11:51 AM Sandy Chase 09/11/2013 02:44 PM Started On: 08/30/2013 11:35 AM Packet Page 70 of 895 CITY OF EDMONDS �Q v aw) CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Form `• / Received by City Please take note that MIX, i IX, who currently resides at 7o 7 A/t t .•- mailing address _ home phone Od - 96 —, work phone # and who resided at at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is is claiming damages against _r /l, ¢� in the sum of $ ( arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: b' I i TIME: LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 41:6161 N 12A [@TkT1 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. r r✓+ (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. s 'C, 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? If so, please provide the name of the insurance company and the policy #: License Plate # Type Auto: (year) DRIVER: Address: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Address: Yes "-�No c o w� tT• o OC �.�, GLr yri+ ,_.��. _ 1►'1sL.�c ' �� _G_,1 �.f�� * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * * (make) Driver License # (model) _ OWNER: Address: Phone#: _ Name: Address: Font Revised 07/16/09 Packet Page 71 of 895 Page 1 of 2 * * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * * L ` I, i��/lam �•� Lac ✓ 1 Ik"p being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true. x -�WA/ 1000/1 x State of Washin ton County of Signature of Claimant(s) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that /� ! �� d6aj, f a t4dbs the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 4 4441u,r-r •-26 Title My appointment expires: Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Form Revised 07/16/09 Packet Page 72 of 895 Page 2 of 2 RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Received by Cky n J j�3 j�(( �7+[� /ij Date Claim Form ERK r Please take note that r % )f�wh❑ currently resides at 1 mailing address �fojiz E home phone ##¢_,�� , work phone # , and who resided at at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth i claiming damages against in the sum of $ 19 arising caul of the foil in circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: LOCATION OF OCCU OE5CRIPTION: TIME:. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. (attach an extra sheet for additionai information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if app "ble, to the ac5 rrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. •;�� .d � h .� • .� � Jn .ram/? _ I. 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: anti the policy #: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY ** License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone-#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Farm Revised 07116/0 Page I of 2 Packet Page 73 of 895 `NOTE: THIS FORM MUST 6E SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * * I, ��,%, , 0 t &J� j ! , being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the Contents thereof and believe the same to be true. x Signature of Claimants) State of Wa hington County of , CYLIb v yy�Tu„, Ntv en ow%A I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mg i(\ J41 s t jtKN the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to he (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Signa ,e Title My appointment expires: 7 1 2kk Please present the completed claim form to: lomy Pak t>M 01 ft 1 E 0 - mtv Al IWW My Appilft" Ex" My 5, 2016 City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Dorm Revised 07116,.iN Packet Page 74 of 895 Page 2 of 2 �P� Lam• ��-C�- Y �J vY ��Vll/ � r `--� r •V - V �V � � I �J '- r �� . d0� �- Packet Page 75 of 895 RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS. r' O CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM ]] Re We by C ry ZK f 7 Please take note that C ` 140d aA0. i'` o l t{"tL[.0 I6eu, who currently resides at L 3l mQ.ale- 0.� W N I ?� 02,0 _ , mailing address home phone # 42S 58 work phone 4M-2170-! 13L , and who resided at Saxyw- at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is , is claiming damages against F_d MM S_ in the sum of $ ( 6e baec i . ising out of the following circumstances listed below. wrm DATE OF OCCURRENCE: -aq `20I3 _ cctt TIME: O® pin czp.pf a LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: b31 1 1 IG},,jJe Si Shim Luo �S)�ii 4m)a ��[6ea DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. tarraen an exrra sneer for aoarrionai intormarton, it neecreor 2. f .Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the ccurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. ' Ij ( ]le- (p4D &de- a a A+ 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, Injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 11 Have you sub fitted a claim for damages to yo If so, please provide the name of the surance and the policy #: �e.a f or insurance company? Yes No company: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY " License Plate # Driver License # Type Auto: _ (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: OWNER: Address: Address: Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: Form Revised 07116M9 Packet Page 76 of 895 Page I of 2 * * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * * I, � � i ��A a4 rk�, e J-� &CLtn,e ing first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know f�e contents thereof and believe the same to be true. x Signal r of Claimant(s) State of Was ing on County of I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that( �� f��_ �j�Q J�C� ;s the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: NoWy Pubk ?0if L State of Washington Title AMY E BOISSE My appointment expires: MY Appointment Expires Apr 9, 2014 Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue (`forth Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Form Revised 07/16/09 Packet Page 77 of 895 Page 2 of 2 RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM 911' U 4 lUk Date Claim Form EDP � �f�LLRx - Please take note that Jon H. Hie who currently resides at 708 Birch St. , Edmonds, WA 98020 mailing address Same address. home phone # (425) 967-3674, work phone # (206) 200-0530 and who resided at Same address. at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is-, is claiming damages against city of Edmonds, WA in the sum of $ $20, 000 . 00 arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: 8/29/2013 TIME: 5:45` PM LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 708 Birch St., Edmonds, WA 98020 and storm drain located at same location. DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. On the date and approximate time noted above the city maintained storm drain on the Southeastern corner of this property became clogged with debris and caused flooding of the listed property. The flooding caused standing water against the house of up to 6 inches and inside the lower floor of the house of up to 4 inches with resultant damage to the structure and contents. (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. Mark Blanchard, 706 Birch St., Edmonds, WA, 98020. Phone# (206) 715-7081 Anthony James Kuthy, 8314 218th St. SW, Edmonds, WA 98032 Phone# (425) 772-1760 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes X No If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: * * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY " License Plate # Driver License # _ Type Auto: _ (year) (make) (model) DRIVER: _ OWNER: Address: _ Address: _ Phone#: Phone#: Passengers: Name: Name: Address: Address: _. Form Revised 07/16/09 Packet Page 78 of 895 Page 1 of 2 * * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * * I, Jon H. Hie being first duly swum, depose and say that -cleWi6t fo hS a a described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same t e t x x _ Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington County of I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that VA�VLC— is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: 0-01 / oal -zz> ( 3 SiANTM n tur� 6 Title My appointment expires: Of l k6 Zd I Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. BRETf A. PENOT STATE OF WASHMMN NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 01-25-17 Fonm Revised 07/16/09 Packet Page 79 of 895 Page 2 of 2 RECEIVED ` 111 4) ) CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM CLERK Dale Claim Form calved by Clt o..� . Please take note thatJodi Sackville who currently resides at 19102 20th Dr. SE, #B101, Bothell, WA 98012-8701 mailing address SAME home phone #(206) 356-1142 . work phone # and who resided at the aforesaid address at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is �, is claiming damages againsiCity of Edmonds, d/b/a/ In the sum of $ 500,000 arising out of the following circumstances listed below. Edmonds Police Department DATE OF OCCURRENCE: ongoing to at least three years TIME: N/A LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: Edmonds Police Department DESCRIPTION: t . Des ri a the conduct and circumstance that Iyou�h� abo�lt I injury or dam I q d8lcrit>ke the in't#ry od dem �e. I was sex ua�y arasse by a sergeant and reporte it, I he mon s o ice uepartmen P� alle o to e prom n e ec 1 e steps to.provide a safe working environment for me. Since that time, the EPD has engaged in and continues to engage in sex discrimination, cex al odentation discriminatiruu wd retaliation anainst me_ (attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed) 2. Provide a list o1 witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. .Coporal Aaron Greenmun, Sgt. Richardson. Officer Mehl, Officer Morrison, Ma_ry_Ann Hardee, Corporal McClure and others. .AJJ can -be reacbeli_at EP-0 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. N/A 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes X No It so, please provide the name of the Insurance company: and the policy #: •' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY " License Plate # Type Auto: _ (year) (make) DRIVER. Address Phone#: Passengers: Name: Address: Form kevwd 071160) Packet Page 80 of 895 Driver License # (model) _ OWNER: Address: Phone#: _ Name: Address: Page I of 2 • NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED' ' 1, Jodi Sackville _, being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be e. x Signature of Claimant(s) State of Washington County of KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Jodi Sackville __ is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. .• �ir��>��.iwl iIM Title My appointment expires: 12/19/14 Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Farm Revncd 07116" Page 2 of 2 Packet Page 81 of 895 anther Welcome to the New Frontier *****NOTICE OF CLAIM***** Date: 09-06-2013 CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED To: CITY OF EDMONDS CITY CLERK CITY HALL 121 5TH AVENUE N EDMONDS, WA 98020 CERTIFIED MAIL# 9171 9690 0935 0036 8649 18 RE: Damage to FRONTIER Property FRONTIER Claim Num: WAFR135786 Damage/Discovery Date: Damage Location: Damage County: Damage Amount: Dear Sir/Madam: 08-14-2013 321 2ND AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA SNOHMISH UNDETERMINED CMR CLAIMS DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 60770 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73146-0770 1-866-887-4066 RECEIVED SEP 12 2013 JJ EDMONDS CITY CLERK Please be advised that FRONTIER Facilities sustained damage as a result of the negligent acts or omissions by employees or agents of CITY OF EDMONDS. Investigation has revealed that on or about 08-14-2013 employees or agents of CITY OF EDMONDS, CITY OF EDMONDS DAMAGED A 100 PAIR BURIED FRONTIER CABLE WHILE PLACING A WATER METER FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION in the area of 321 2ND AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA. This letter is the written presentment of FRONTIER's claim pursuant to Washington Statute (RCW 4.96.020(2)) . REQUEST FOR GOVERNMENTAL NOTICE FORM If your Governmental Entity requires the completion of its own form to complete proper notice, please forward a copy to the address listed above. Every good faith effort has been made to identify the proper office and address to perfect our notice. Please forward to your attorney, if misdirected, to contact us. Matters herein stated are alleged on information and belief this pleader believes to be true. If there is insurance to cover this matter, kindly advise as to the name of the insurance company, its address and the claim number assigned. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please conta�,t�1� llll�� 1-800-321-4158 ext 8232. � G�� '4 . f # 06011463 — Sincerely, _ EXP. 11/28/14 Holly Finley NA rrffffl,,I OF...OK�P�'��`� ��III Ili flll�l� II J�fr U 1 1 NOTARY �1 CMR Claims DEPT Commission Expires, Packet Page 82 of 895 AM-6101 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: Consent Submitted For: Dave Earling Department: Mayor's Office Review Committee: Type: Action Information Submitted By: Committee Action: 4. D. Carolyn LaFave Subject Title Approval of Edmonds businesses applying for renewal of their Washington State Liquor Control Board liquor licenses for the month of August 2013. Recommendation Please approve the list of Edmonds businesses applying for renewal of their WSLCB liquor license for the month of August 2013. Previous Council Action Narrative The City Clerk's Office, the Police Department, and the Mayor's Office have reviewed the attached list and have no concerns with the Washington State Liquor Control Board renewing the liquor licenses for the listed businesses. WSLCB Aug13 Inbox City Clerk Mayor Finalize for Agenda Fonn Started By: Carolyn LaFave Final Approval Date: 09/11/2013 Reviewed By Sandy Chase Dave Earling Sandy Chase AttnehmPntc Form Review Date 09/11/2013 02:44 PM 09/11/2013 03:17 PM 09/11/2013 05:14 PM Started On: 09/10/2013 10:42 AM Packet Page 83 of 895 v v m 00 0 00 m cn Washington State Liquor Control Board PO Box 43098, 3000 Pacific Ave. SE, Olympia WA 98504-3098, (360) 664-1600 RECEIVED AUG 12 2013 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR MAYOR OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVE NORTH EDMONDS, WA 98020 N 0 C CD Washington State m Liquor Control Board Cn PO Box 43098, 3000 Pacific Ave. SE, Olympia WA 98504-3098, (360) 664-1600 0 www.liq.wa.gov Fax #: (360) 753-2710 OD CD Dt August 08, 2013 Dear Local Authority: RE: Liquor License Renewal Applications in Your Jurisdiction - Your Objection Opportunity Enclosed please find a list of liquor -licensed premises in your jurisdiction whose liquor licenses will expire in about 90 days. This is your opportunity to object to these license renewal requests as authorized by RCW 66.24.010 (8). 1) Objection to License Renewal To object to a liquor license renewal: fax or mail a letter to the Washington State Liquor Control Board (WSLCB) Licensing Division. This letter must: o Detail the reason(s) for your objection, including a statement of all the facts upon which your objection or objections are based. You may include attachments and supporting documents which contain or confirm the facts upon which your objections are based. o Please note that whether a hearing will be granted or not is within the Board's discretion per RCW 66.24.010 (8)(d). Your letter or fax of objection must be received by the Board's Licensing Division at least 30 days prior to the license expiration date. If you need additional time you must request that in writing. Please be aware, however, that it is within the Board's discretion to grant or deny any requests for extension of time to submit objections. Your request for extension will be granted or denied in writing. If objections are not timely received, they will not be considered as part of the renewal process. A copy of your objection and any attachments and supporting materials will be made available to the licensee, therefore, it is the Local Authority's responsibility to redact any confidential or non-disclosable information (see RCW 42.56) prior to submission to the WSLCB. 2) Status of License While Objection Pending During the time an objection to a renewal is pending, the permanent liquor license is placed on hold. However, temporary licenses are regularly issued to the licensee until a final decision is made by the Board. 3) Procedure Following Licensing Division Receipt of Objection After we receive your objection, our licensing staff will prepare a report for review by the Licensing Director. The report will include your letter of objection, as well as any attachments and supporting documents you send. The Licensing Director will then decide to renew the liquor license, or to proceed with non -renewal. 4) Procedure if Board Does Not Renew License If the Board decides not to renew a license, we will notify the licensee in writing, stating the reason for this decision. The licensee also has the right to request a hearing to contest non -renewal of their liquor license. RCW 66.24.010 (8)(d). If the licensee makes a timely request for a hearing, we will notify you. The Board's Licensing Division will be required to present evidence at the hearing before an administrative law judge to support the non -renewal recommendation. You may present evidence in support of your objection or objections. The administrative law judge will consider all of the evidence and issue an initial order for the Board's review. The Board members have final authority to renew the liquor license and will enter a final order announcing their decision. N 0 C CD 5) Procedure if Board Renews License Over Your Objection CD rn If the Board decides to renew the license over your objection, you will be notified in writing. At that time, you may be p given an opportunity to request a hearing. An opportunity for a hearing is offered at the Board's discretion. If a hearing is held, you will be responsible for presenting evidence before an Administrative Law Judge in support of your objection to Oo license renewal. The Board's Licensing Division will present evidence in support of license renewal. The Licensee may CA also participate and present evidence if the licensee desires. The administrative law judge will consider all of the evidence, and issue an initial order for the Board's review. The Board members have final authority to renew the liquor license and will enter a final order announcing their decision. For questions about this process, contact the WSLCB Licensing Division at (360) 664-1600 or email us at wslcb@liq.wa.gov. Sincerely, Man E. Rathbun Alan E. Rathbun, Director, Licensing and Regulation Division LIQ 864 07/10 v C CD C091080-2 WASHINGTON STATE LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD DATE: 08/08/2013 CD m LICENSED ESTABLISHMENTS IN INCORPORATED AREAS CITY OF EDMONDS 00 (BY ZIP CODE) FOR EXPIRATION DATE OF 20131130 0 LICENSE OD LICENSEE BUSINESS NAME AND ADDRESS NUMBER PRIVILEGES Ut 1 . CONVENIENCE RETAILERS LLC CIRCLE R/76 #2705927 369115 GROCERY STORE - BEER/WINE 22625 HWY 99 EDMONDS WA 98020 0000 2 . 7-ELEVEN, INC. 7-ELEVEN #16O80M 359088 GROCERY STORE - BEER/WINE 21109 76TH AVE W EDMONDS WA 98020 0000 3 . RUSTY PELICAN CAFE EDMONDS, IN RUSTY PELICAN CAFE EDMONDS 086368 SPIRITS/BR/WN REST SERVICE BAR 107 5TH AVE N STE 102-103 • EDMONDS WA 98020 3211 4 . HAMBURGER HARRY'S II, LLC HAMBURGER HARRY'S II 079522 SPIRITS/BR/WN REST LOUNGE + 610 5TH AVE S STE 1 EDMONDS WA 98020 3404 5 . SUSHI MOTO, INC. SUSHI MOTO 082272 BEER/WINE REST - BEER/WINE 22618 HWY 99 STE 102 EDMONDS WA 98026 8376 6 . T & T SEAFOOD RESTAURANT CORPO T & T SEAFOOD RESTAURANT IN EDMONDS 085925 BEER/WINE REST - BEER/WINE 22511 HWY 99 UNIT 103 EDMONDS WA 98026 8398 AM-6105 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: Consent Submitted For: Phil Williams Department: Public Works Submitted By: Kody McConnell Committee: Finance Type: Action Information Subiect Title Authorization to contract with James G. Murphy to sell surplus city vehicles. 4. E. Recommendation It is recommended that authorization be given to Public Works to contract with James G. Murphy Auctioneers to sell a surplus vehicle obtained through a seizure by the Edmonds Police Department. Previous Council Action Narrative Previously, the city has utilized the services of James G. Murphy Auctioneers to sell surplus city vehicles and equipment. This has proven to be a cost effective method to manage surplus items. The following vehicle was obtained through seizure by the Edmonds Police Department and can be divested as surplus. 2002 BMW X5 VIN# 5UXFA53522LP55520 WA License B78606G Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year: 2013 Fiscal Impact: Monies will be deposited into the General Fund. Inbox City Clerk Mayor Finalize for Agenda Form Started By: Kody McConnell Final Approval Date: 09/11/2013 Revenue: 6000 Form Review Reviewed By Date Sandy Chase 09/11/2013 02:44 PM Dave Earling 09/11/2013 03:18 PM Sandy Chase 09/11/2013 05:14 PM Started On: 09/11/2013 01:34 PM Expenditure: Packet Page 88 of 895 AM-6103 4. F. City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: Consent Submitted For: Bertrand Hauss Department: Engineering Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Submitted By: Megan Luttrell Type: Action Information Subiect Title Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #4 with David Evans & Associates for the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements project. Recommendation Authorize Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #4 with David Evans & Associates. Previous Council Action On August 14, 2012, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #2 with David Evans & Associates for the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvement project. On September 10, 2013, the Planning, Parks and Public Works Committee reviewed this item and recommended it be placed on the consent agenda for approval. Narrative 76th Avenue W @ 212th St. SW is one of the busiest signalized intersections in the City and is served by two federally classified minor arterial streets. The intersection experiences long queues during peak commute and school hours due to the limited capacity of the intersection. Both approaches of 76th Avenue have two shared lanes (w/ no dedicated left turn lane) and the left turn volumes are very high, and are timed independently by split phasing signal timing. The proposed improvement will provide dedicated left turn lanes on 76th Avenue and concurrent turning movements during the protected left turn phase. This project will increase the capacity and improve intersection signal operation, traffic flow, vehicle delay, and air quality by reducing vehicle emissions. The supplement adds the following design tasks: • Stormwater facilities with the addition of flow control and water quality system (based on recommendation from the Stormwater Evaluation Report); • Sanitary sewer line: the existing 8-inch diameter pipeline on 76th Ave. W is in poor condition and needs replacement; • Waterline: the existing 8-inch diameter watermain on 76th Ave. W will be replaced with a 12-inch diameter watermain, to increase capacity; and • Completion of right of way acquisition phase: right of way is needed from seven parcels along the project limits. The sub -consultant (Universal Field Services) is providing right-of-way acquisition assistance for this project. The scope of work will consist of completing exhibits, legal descriptions, survey staking, appraisal / appraisal review, negotiations with property owners, parcel Packet Page 89 of 895 closeout, and right-of-way certification. A federal grant (through Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality program) for $940,397 was secured to begin the design and right of way (ROW) phases. The grant requires a local match of 13.5% ($146,700) and this amount is funded by the Street Fund 112. The design fee for Supplement #4 is $168,611 and will be funded by different City Funds (Fund 112 and Utility funds) and the CMAQ grant. The supplement also creates a new management reserve amount of $20,000 since the initial amount of $22,000 was completely used in Supplement No. 3 to pay for a storm drainage report and right of way project funding estimate. The utility improvements (water, stormwater, and sewer) incorporated into this supplement are funded by the respective utility funds (Fund 421, 422, and 423). The design and ROW phases are scheduled for completion in 2015. No funding source is currently secured for the construction phase, but the completion of the design and right of way phases will help the project score well on future grant applications for construction funding. Attachments David Evans Supplemental Agreement #4 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 09/12/2013 10:20 AM Public Works Kody McConnell 09/12/2013 10:57 AM City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/12/2013 11:34 AM Mayor Dave Earling 09/12/2013 04:35 PM Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 09/12/2013 04:57 PM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 09/11/2013 01:14 PM Final Approval Date: 09/12/2013 Packet Page 90 of 895 Washington State wo Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement I" g Organization and Address David Evans and Associates, Inc. Number 4 415 - 118th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98005 Original Agreement Number DEA Project # COED0000-0004 Phone: (425) 519-6500 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date City Project No. E1CA/c368 9/11/2013 4/30/2015 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable 76th Ave W & 212th St SW Intersection Improvement $ 469,311.00 Description of Work Consultant services for Supplement #4 include right-of-way acquisition and support services, waterline design, and sanitary sewer design. The Local Agency of the City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered into with David Evans and Associates, Inc. and executed on 2/23/2012 and identified as Agreement No. E1CA/c368 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: See the attached "Fxhihit A-1 " for the Scone of Work Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: There is no change to the project completion date Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: This Supplement adds . 70,000 to the Management Reserve Fund, which now has total of . 70 000 remaining See the attached "Fxhihit F-1 " for the fee estimate as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: Kirk Harris, P F By: Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 Packet Page 91 of 895 Date Exhibit A-1 761h Avenue W and 212th Street SW Intersection Improvements Project SCOPE OF SERVICES Supplement No. 4 Prepared for: CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Prepared by: DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 415 - 118th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98005-3518 (425) 519-6500 September 11, 2013 Packet Page 92 of 895 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 9.0 PS&E DESIGN................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 10.0 RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION SUPPORT SERVICES ................................. 1 10.1 Right -of -Way Plan / Parcel Exhibits / Legal Descriptions / Survey Staking....................1 10.1.1 Right-qf--Way Plan.........................................................................................................1 10.1.2 Parcel Exhibits...............................................................................................................1 10.1.3 Legal Descriptions.........................................................................................................1 10.1.4 Survey Staking................................................................................................................ 2 10.2 RAN Subconsultant Management.................................................................................2 10.2.1 R/W Subconsultant Management and Administration................................................... 2 10.2.2 Design Supportfor R/WAcguisition Services................................................................ 2 10.2.3 Quality Assurance / Quality Control............................................................................. 2 SECTION 12.0 WATERLINE DESIGN...................................................................................... 2 12.1 Waterline Design (90% Completion).............................................................................2 12.2 Waterline Design (100% Completion)...........................................................................3 12.3 Waterline Design (Ad Ready Documents).....................................................................4 12.4 Assistance During Bid Period.......................................................................................4 SECTION 13.0 SANITARY SEWER DESIGN............................................................................ 4 13.1 Sewer Line Design (90% Completion)..........................................................................4 13.2 Sewer Line Design (100% Completion)........................................................................5 13.3 Sewer Line (Ad Ready Documents)..............................................................................6 13.4 Assistance During Bid Period.......................................................................................6 P:IcICOED000000041000000N10030ContractlSupplement4lExhibitA-1_DEAScope _76th 212th_2013-09-11.docx City of Edmonds i Scope of Services, Supp. No. 4 76"' Ave. W and 2121h St. SW Projcct Septembcr 11, 2013 Packet Page 93 of 895 City of Edmonds 76t" Avenue W and 2121" Street SW Intersection Improvements Project SCOPE OF SERVICES Supplement No. 4 Section 9.0 PS&E Design The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) documents to include plans, profiles, and details of a stormwater detention (flow control) and water quality system situated at the southwest quadrant of the intersection consistent with the findings and recommendations outlined in the Stormwater Evaluation Report. The stormwater detention (flow control) and water quality facilities will be incorporated into the 90% and 100% submittals defined in Supplement No. 2. The CONSULTANT shall complete a WSDOT LAG Manual Design Checklist as part of the 90% submittal, as well as any future submittals. Section 10.0 Right -of -Way Acquisition Support Services 10.1 Right -of -Way Plan / Parcel Exhibits / Legal Descriptions / Survey Staking 10.1.1 Right -of -Way Plan The CONSULTANT shall prepare right-of-way plans for the preferred improvements, research existing survey records and obtain records of surveys and legal descriptions for the properties affected by the project, and obtain title reports for all affected properties. The CONSULTANT shall develop right-of-way plans. The base information on the plans shall include surveyed topographic base mapping, property lines, right-of-way lines, and easements, names of property owners, parcel areas, sections, townships, ranges, and survey control information. The CONSULTANT shall establish the required right-of-way for the project based on the preliminary design. The new right- of-way together with areas of acquisition for each parcel shall be shown on the right-of-way plans along with permanent and temporary construction easements (TCE). The plans shall be developed in accordance with the WSDOT LAG manual. 10.1.2 Parcel Exhibits The CONSULTANT shall prepare parcel exhibits for each affected individual parcel. It is estimated that parcel exhibits are required for seven (7) total parcels, of which seven (7) will require both right-of-way acquisition exhibits and TCE exhibits. 10.1.3 Legal Descriptions The CONSULTANT shall provide descriptions of the fee simple acquisitions, permanent easement acquisitions, or TCE areas. The CONSULTANT will include area calculations and rights -of -way dimensions with the parcel descriptions. It is estimated that legal descriptions are required for seven (7) total parcels. P:IcICOED000000041000000M0030ContractlSupplement4lExhib#A-1_DEA Scope_76th 212th_2013-09-11.docx City of Edmonds 1 Scope of Services, Supp. No. 4 76`' Ave. W and 212th St. SW Project September 11, 2013 Packet Page 94 of 895 10.1.4 Survey Staking The CONSULTANT shall provide staking of the existing right-of-way and of the acquisition area for appraisal and negotiating purposes on the seven (7) private parcels affected by the project. Permanent monuments can be set upon request. The hours for setting permanent monuments are not included in this Scope of Services. Hours estimated are based upon the assumption that a minimum of seven (7) parcels can and will be staked during any given visit to the project site. The CONSULTANT shall engage a qualified subconsultant - Universal Field Services (UFS) to provide Right-of-way acquisition assistance to for the project. Work to acquire real property shall be performed in accordance with the State and Federal Right -of -Way Procedures and Policy and in accordance with the state Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition (Ch. 8.26 RCW) and State Regulations (Ch. 468-100 WAC) Washington Administrative Code and applicable federal regulations. It is assumed the following level of effort will be required: • Seven (7) Partial Acquisitions with needed Temporary Construction Easements (TCE) 10.2 R/W Subconsultant Management 10.2.1 R/W Subconsultant Management and Administration The CONSULTANT shall manage and coordinate the work of UFS consistent with an executed subconsultant agreement and associated scope of work as attached to and made part of this scope of services as identified in Exhibit A-1.2 (dated 8-12-13). 10.2.2 Design Support for R/W Acquisition Services The CONSULTANT shall provide design support to the subconsultant UFS during the period it is providing right-of-way acquisition services. It is anticipated that discussions with the affected parcel owners will require specific exhibits and that as part of the negotiations, there will be specific requests for design modifications to be incorporated into the PROJECT. 10.2.3 Quality Assurance / Quality Control The subconsultant UFS shall be responsible for its own QA/QC review of deliverables by a designated QA/QC staff member of the subconsultant team. The review will cover documents, exhibits, and other pertinent information on an ongoing basis. The program entails the periodic review of work products, design, and assumptions, as well as concepts and presentation of product format; and assures that the overall project objectives are being fulfilled. Section 12.0 Waterline Design 12.1 Waterline Design (90% Completion) The CONSULTANT shall prepare 90% plans, specifications, quantities, and cost estimate (PS&E) bid documents to replace an existing water main that lies directly over an existing failing sanitary sewer line. Replacement of the sanitary sewer line (as described in Section 13.0) will require replacement and relocation laterally of the existing water main as well as reconnection to existing services. The approximate length of the replacement is approximately 1,000 feet (76fl' Station 132+75 to Station 122+75). The water main replacement will require reconnection to the approximately 9 commercial parcels, 3 residential parcels, and one high school (Edmonds-Woodway HS) that are currently served by P:IcICOED000000041000000M0030ContractlSupplement4lExhib#A-1_DEA Scope_76th 212th_2013-09-11.docx City of Edmonds 2 Scope of Services, Supp. No. 4 76`' Ave. W and 212th St. SW Project September 11, 2013 Packet Page 95 of 895 to the existing line to be replaced. The City will provide direction for the size and type of the proposed waterline. The amount of waterline replaced north of the intersection will depend on whether the sewer system is realigned or not. Two hydrants are anticipated to be replaced and relocated, and one hydrant is anticipated to be reconnected. Deliverable: • 90% Design Plan Completion Level: 5 copies of half-size set (I I"x17" ); 3 copies of full-size set (22"x34"); 1 electronic PDF copy and AutoCAD file. • 90% Design Contract Documents: 2 hard copies and 1 electronic PDF version. • WSDOT PS&E Checklist. • Sole Source Justification Memorandum — 1 electronic PDF version Meetings: • One (1) 90% Design Review Meeting. Assumptions: • Final design will be incorporated into the 76"' and 212"' Intersection Improvement Project plans, specifications, and estimate. • Separate plan sheets will be prepared for the waterline replacement. Plan sheets will include plan/profile and details. • Pavement replacement details will be prepared for these improvements. The quantities will be included in either the roadway bid schedule or a separate schedule. The specifications, quantities, and estimate will follow the format for the 76"' and 212"' Intersection Improvement Project (WSDOT format). Applicable City of Edmond's water standard details will be added in the Appendix. • The water fund will be billed for a portion of the pavement work. • Non-standard details will be added to the plan set. Special provisions will be added to the specification package being prepared for the project. • Quantities for the waterline work will be prepared and included in a separate schedule (Schedule B) in the bid proposal. It is assumed that no additional topographic survey or geotechnical investigations will be conducted by the CONSULTANT. Any pothole operations will be coordinated by the CONSULTANT, and performed through the services of the City. • All work will be within City -owned right-of-way or easements. • All permits required for the water main replacement will be obtained by the City of Edmonds. 12.2 Waterline Design (100% Completion) The CONSULTANT shall prepare the following in accordance with the CITY's and WSDOT's 90% completion level review comments and coordination meeting, and in accordance with regulatory agency permit conditions: Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 90% design plan set and coordination meeting — 100% Completion submittal. Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 90% design specifications set and coordination meeting — 100% Completion submittal. Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 90% design cost estimate and coordination meeting — 100% Completion submittal. Deliverables: • 100% Design Plan Completion Level: 5 copies of half-size set (11"x17"); 5 copies of full-size set (22"04"); 1 electronic PDF copy and AutoCAD file. P:IcICOED000000041000000M0030ContractlSupplement4lExhib#A-1_DEA Scope_76th 212th_2013-09-11.docx City of Edmonds 3 Scope of Services, Supp. No. 4 76"' Ave. W and 212th St. SW Project September 11, 2013 Packet Page 96 of 895 • 100% Design Contract Documents: 2 hard copies and 1 electronic version. • 100% Design Cost Estimate: 2 hard copies and 1 electronic version. Meetings: • One (1) 100% Design Review Meeting. 12.3 Waterline Design (Ad Ready Documents) The CONSULTANT shall prepare the following in accordance with the CITY's and WSDOT's 100% completion level review comments and coordination meeting, and in accordance with regulatory agency permit conditions: • Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 100% design plan set and coordination meeting — Ad Ready Documents. • Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 100% design specifications set and coordination meeting — Ad Ready Documents. • Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 100% design cost estimate and coordination meeting — Ad Ready Documents. The CONSULTANT will assemble all plan sheets, general and special provisions, cost estimates, and associated documentation for submittal as an Ad Ready PS&E package. Deliverables: • Ad Ready Documents: 5 copies of half-size set (11"xl7"); 1 copies of full-size set (22"x34"); 1 electronic PDF copy and AutoCAD file. • Ad Ready Design Contract Documents: 1 hard copies and 1 electronic PDF and MS Word version. • Ad Ready Design Cost Estimate: 1 hard copies and 1 electronic PDF version. 12.4 Assistance During Bid Period The CONSULTANT shall: • Provide assistance during the ad period for construction bids answering bidder questions. Section 13.0 Sanitary Sewer Design 13.1 Sewer Line Design (90% Completion) A replacement for an existing 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer along 76"' Avenue West, within the project limits, shall be incorporated into the 90% and 100% submittals as defined in Supplement No. 2. The CONSULTANT shall prepare 90% plans, specifications, quantities, and cost estimate (PS&E) bid documents to replace an existing 8-inch diameter sanitary sewer along 76th Avenue West, which is failing within the project limits. The location of the failing pipe to be replaced is approximately between Station 123+00 and Station 132+10. Replacement of the sanitary sewer line will also require reconnections of the existing side sewers. It is anticipated that there are a total of 10 side sewer connections. This includes 5 between MH 9-256 and MH 9-255, 3 between MH 9-255 and MH 9-254, and 2 between MH 9-254 and MH 14-40. P:IcICOED000000041000000M0030ContractlSupplement4lExhib#A-1_DEA Scope_76th 212th_2013-09-11.docx City of Edmonds 4 Scope of Services, Supp. No. 4 76"' Ave. W and 212th St. SW Project September 11, 2013 Packet Page 97 of 895 Deliverable: 90% Design Plan Completion Level: 5 copies of half-size set (I I"x17" ); 3 copies of full-size set (22"x34"); 1 electronic PDF copy and AutoCAD file. 90% Design Contract Documents: 2 hard copies and 1 electronic PDF version. Meetings: • One (1) 90% Design Review Meeting. Assumptions: • Final design will be incorporated into the 76"' and 2121h Intersection Improvement Project plans, specifications, and estimate. • Separate plan sheets will be prepared for the sewer line replacement. Plan sheets will include plan/profile and details. • Pavement replacement details will be prepared for these improvements. The quantities will be included in either the roadway bid schedule or a separate schedule. The specifications, quantities, and estimate will follow the format for the 76`h and 212'b Intersection Improvement Project (WSDOT format). Applicable City of Edmond's sewer standard details will be added in the Appendix. • The sewer fund will be billed for a portion of the pavement work. • Non-standard details will be added to the plan set. Special provisions will be added to the specification package being prepared for the project. • Quantities for the sewer line work will be prepared and included in a separate schedule (Schedule C) in the bid proposal. It is assumed that no additional topographic survey or geotechnical investigations will be conducted by the CONSULTANT. Any pothole operations will be coordinated by the CONSULTANT, and performed through the services of the City. • All work will be within City -owned right-of-way or easements. • All permits required for the sewer line replacement will be obtained by the City of Edmonds. 13.2 Sewer Line Design (100% Completion) The CONSULTANT shall prepare the following in accordance with the CITY's and WSDOT's 90% completion level review comments and coordination meeting, and in accordance with regulatory agency permit conditions: Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 90% design plan set and coordination meeting — 100% Completion submittal. Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 90% design specifications set and coordination meeting — 100% Completion submittal. Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 90% design cost estimate and coordination meeting — 100% Completion submittal. Deliverables: • 100% Design Plan Completion Level: 5 copies of half-size set (I I"xl7" ); 5 copies of full-size set (22"x34"); 1 electronic PDF copy and AutoCAD file. • 100% Design Contract Documents: 2 hard copies and 1 electronic version. • 100% Design Cost Estimate: 2 hard copies and 1 electronic version. Meetings: • One (1) 100% Design Review Meeting. P:IcICOED000000041000000M0030ContractlSupplement4lExhib#A-1_DEA Scope_76th 212th_2013-09-11.docx City of Edmonds 5 Scope of Services, Supp. No. 4 76`' Ave. W and 212th St. SW Project September 11, 2013 Packet Page 98 of 895 13.3 Sewer Line (Ad Ready Documents) The CONSULTANT shall prepare the following in accordance with the CITY's and WSDOT's 100% completion level review comments and coordination meeting, and in accordance with regulatory agency permit conditions: • Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 100% design plan set and coordination meeting — Ad Ready Documents. • Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 100% design specifications set and coordination meeting — Ad Ready Documents. • Modifications and/or revisions in response to CITY review comments from the 100% design cost estimate and coordination meeting — Ad Ready Documents. The CONSULTANT will assemble all plan sheets, general and special provisions, cost estimates, and associated documentation for submittal as an Ad Ready PS&E package. Deliverables: • Ad Ready Documents: 5 copies of half-size set (11"xl7"); 1 copies of full-size set (22"04"); 1 electronic PDF copy and AutoCAD file. • Ad Ready Design Contract Documents: 1 hard copies and 1 electronic PDF and MS Word version. • Ad Ready Design Cost Estimate: 1 hard copies and 1 electronic PDF version. 13.4 Assistance During Bid Period The CONSULTANT shall: • Provide assistance during the ad period for construction bids answering bidder questions. P:IcICOED000000041000000M0030ContractlSupplement4lExhib#A-1_DEA Scope_76th 212th_2013-09-11.docx City of Edmonds 6 Scope of Services, Supp. No. 4 76`' Ave. W and 212th St. SW Project September 11, 2013 Packet Page 99 of 895 Exhibit "E" Summary of Payments Basic Agreement Suppl. #1 Date Mod. Suppl. #2 Suppl. #3 Suppl. #4 Total Direct Salary Cost $17,768 $61,974 $4,971 $25,874 $110,587 Overhead (including Payroll Additives) $32,774 $114,318 $9,169 $47,727 $203,988 Direct Non -Salary Cost $2,367 $27,012 $6,459 $67,714 $103,552 Fixed Fee $5,010 $17,477 $1,401 $7,296 $31,184 Management Reserve Fund $22,000 ($22,000) $20,000 $20,000 Total $57,919 n/a $242,781 $0 $168,611 $469,311 MANAGEMENT RESERVE RELEASES The following management reserve releases have been issued and are now incorporated as part of the contract. MRR #1 - Suppl. #3 8/9/2013 $ 22,000.00 Air Quality Report, PFE, Stormwater Report, PS&E docs Management Reserve Budget: $ 42,000.00 Management Reserve Balance: $ 20,000.00 DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 Packet Page 100 of 895 Exhibit E-1: Consultant Fee Determination - Fixed Fee 76th Ave W and 212th Street SW Intersection Improvement Project City of Edmonds Supplement No. 4 David Evans and Associates, Inc. Classification Direct Rate Hours Cost 1 Project Manager (PMGR) $ 57.00 124 $7,068 2 Managing Professional Engr/QC (MGPE) $ 57.00 39 $2,223 3 Professional Engineer (PFEN) $ 42.00 210 $8,820 4 Sr. CADD Technician (SCAD) $ 32.50 138 $4,485 5 Survey Manager (SVYM) $ 57.00 10 $570 6 Project Surveyor (PSVR) $ 35.50 22 $781 7 Party Chief (PCHF) $ 28.00 10 $280 8 Instrument Person (INST) $ 24.00 10 $240 9 Administrative Assistant (ADMA) $ 26.75 41 $1,097 10 Exec. Administrator (EXAD) $ 31.00 10 $310 Total Hours 614 Salary Cost $25,874 Overhead Cost @ 184.46% of Direct Labor $47,727 Net Fee @ 28.20% of Direct Labor $7,296 Total Overhead & Net Fee Cost $55,023 Direct Expenses Unit Each No. Cost Mail/Deliveries/Fed Ex @ $22 2 $44 Title Reports @ $500 7 $3,500 Mileage miles @ $0.555 /mile 54 $30 Subtotal $3,574 David Evans and Associates Total $84,471 Subconsultants: Costs Universal Field Services - Right -of -Way Support (Neg/Acq) $64,140 Subconsultant Totals $64,140 Total Costs - Supplement No. 4 $148,611 Management Reserve Fund $20,000 Total Contract Amount $168,611 Page 1 of 2 P:\c\COED00000004\OOOOCON\003OContract\Supplement 4\Exhibit E-1_DEA Budget_76th & 212th_2013-09-11.x1s Printed: 9/11 /2013 Packet Page 101 of 895 Exhibit E-21 Consultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet 76th Ave W and 212th Street SW Intersection Improvement Project City of Edmonds Supplement No. 4 David Evans and Associates, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9 10 Work Element � (19 d m a OLU E C7 c U FM U ` 2 W z W a N C W o N o o a U 0 'V N 0 Q V W In ; N d N N '15 p LL U d U N ? C w d d E 9 N A Q ? E Q Eo p ¢wElement# o Lu O m c Q oWork ai DEA DEA direct rates: 3a $ $2800 $24.00 $2675 $31.00 Total ALL Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs Total hrs Total ALL 2.0 Pro'. Management and Quality Control Project Management and File Management Work Element 2.0 Total PS&E Design Final Design 90% Completion Level 54 54 2.1 36 12 6 $8,001 IF $8,001 9.0 9.3 9.3.1 90 % Design Submittal with WQ and Flow Control Facilities 8 2 36 12 4 62 $8,064 9.4 Construction Documents 100 % Completion Level 9.4.1 100 % Design Submittal with WQ and Flow Control Facilities 4 2 12 4 2 24 $3,219 9.5 Assistance During Bidding Period Work Element 9.0 Total 86 $11,282 12 4 10.0 Right -of -Way Acquisition Services 10.1 Right -of -Way Plan / Parcel Exhibits / Legal Descriptions / Survey Staking _ 10.1.1 Right -of -Way Plan 2 2 16 1 4 25 $2,867 10.1.2 Parcel Exhibits 4 4 24 4 8 44 $5,278 10.1.3 Legal Descriptions 1 24 4 8 37 $4,218 10.1.4 Survey Staking 1 1 2 10 10 24 $2,204 10.2 Subconsultant Management Subconsultant Management and Administration Design Support for R/W Acquisition Services Work Element 10.0 Total Waterline Design Waterline Design 90% Completion Waterline Design (100 % Completion) Waterline Design Ad Ready Documents Assistance During Bid Period Work Element S12.0 Tgfi Sanitary Sewer Design 32 52 214 108 64 14 12 198 32 16 10.2.1 24 4 4 $4,999 10.2.2 12 2 24 12 2 $7,033 12.0 12.1 8 16 56 20 8 $14,332 12.2 8 12 32 8 4 $8,914 12.3 2 2 4 4 2 $1,812 12.4 4 8 $1,763 i $26,822 13.0 13.1 Sewer Line Design 90 % Completion Sewer Line Design (100% Completion) 4 1 18 8 1 $4,151 13.2 2 1 8 4 1 $2,075 13.3 Sewer Line Design Ad Ready Documents Assistance During Bid Period Work Element 13.0 Tot4 Direct Expenses 2 1 4 2 1 10 4 62 $1,347 13.4 2 2 $619 ' $8,192 $3,574 PROJECT WORK ELEMENTS TOTALS 124 39 210 138 10 22 10 10 41 10 s1a $84, .71 f Page 2 of 2 P:\c\CgqWKW0E6'49@OJP 1QU ntract\Supplement 4\Exhibit E-1_DEA Budget_76th & 212th_2013-09-11.xls Printed: 9/11/2013 AM-6115 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: 15 Minutes Submitted For: Phil Olbrechts, Hearing Examiner Department: Planning Review Committee: Type: Information Tnfn1-m0+1nn Subject Title Hearing Examiner Annual Report. Recommendation None. Previous Council Action None. Narrative The Hearing Examiner will provide his annual report to Council. Inbox City Clerk Mayor Finalize for Agenda Form Started By: Diane Cunningham Final Approval Date: 09/12/2013 Submitted By: Committee Action: Form Review Reviewed By Date Sandy Chase 09/12/2013 02:27 PM Dave Earling 09/12/2013 04:32 PM Sandy Chase 09/12/2013 04:57 PM Started On: 09/12/2013 02:11 PM 71, Diane Cunningham Packet Page 103 of 895 AM-6049 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: 10 Minutes Submitted For: Roger Neumaier Department: Finance Committee: Finance Subiect Title July 2013 Budgetary Financial Report Recommendation N.A. For informational purposes only. Previous Council Action N.A. Narrative July 2013 Budgetary Financial Report Inbox Finance City Clerk Mayor Finalize for Agenda Fonn Started By: Sarah Mager Final Approval Date: 09/11/2013 Submitted By: Sarah Mager Type: Tnfnrm atinn Attachments Information Form Review Reviewed By Date Roger Neumaier 08/20/2013 03:25 PM Sandy Chase 09/11/2013 02:44 PM Dave Earling 09/11/2013 03:30 PM Sandy Chase 09/11/2013 05:14 PM Started On: 08/20/2013 10:26 AM Packet Page 104 of 895 O-V E DPI � o� CITY OF EDMONDS BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT JULY 2013 Packet Page 105 of 895 CTIY OF EDMONDS REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund No. Title 001 GENERAL FUND 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 111 STREET FUND 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 113 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FD. 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 127 GIFTSCATALOGFUND 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 131 FIRE DONATIONS 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 2013 Amended Budget 7/31/2012 Revenues 7/31/2013 Revenues Amount Remaining %Received $ 32,882,089 $ 18,775,883 $20,092,766 $ 12,789,323 61% 350,350 300,207 175,164 175,186 50% 418,200 244,000 417,029 1,171 100% 123,223 - 64,224 58,999 52% 15,000 - 714 14,286 5% 56,900 28,496 28,411 28,489 50% 20,175 44,430 17,259 2,916 86% 1,406,800 773,516 848,416 558,384 60% 6,363,755 812,462 1,134,242 5,229,513 18% - - - - 0% 59,891 16,991 11,946 47,945 20% 27 16 9 18 34% 52,870 37,737 29,414 23,456 56% 18,120 6,708 6,505 11,615 36% 2,025 1,336 354 1,671 17% 19,000 93 16,904 2,096 89% 662,600 444,927 535,694 126,906 81% 650,600 384,628 535,338 115,262 82% 20,483 21,002 30,118 (9,635) 147% 222,800 - 291,992 (69,192) 131% 119,950 77,273 60,041 59,909 50% - - - - 0% 2,010,350 418,282 297,361 1,712,989 15% 228 132 252 (24) 111% 14,600 9,284 6,961 7,639 48% 3,517 1,710 7,905 (4,388) 225% 645,000 385,169 391,807 253,193 61% - - 41,177 (41,177) 0% 22,130 1,175 5,916 16,214 27% 22,230 106,154 13 22,217 0% 1,009,902 - 92,264 917,638 9% - N/A 142,051 (142,051) 0% 10,625,680 N/A 3,320,210 7,305,470 31% 3,486,716 N/A 1,938,383 1,548,333 56% 11,020,123 N/A 4,551,016 6,469,107 41% 1,361,972 629,866 830,694 531,278 61% 45,400 68,862 49,595 (4,195) 109% $ 73,732,706 $ 23,5909339 $ 35,972,146 $ 37,760,560 49% 'Due to the change in enterprise fund structure from 2012 to 2013, these revenues are shown as N/A 1 Packet Page 106 of 895 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2013 Amended 7/31/2012 7/31/2013 Amount No. Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent 001 GENERAL FUND $ 33,007,003 $ 18,712,395 $ 19,021,011 $ 13,985,992 58% 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 619,400 349,044 186,289 433,111 30% 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 661,000 - 555,907 105,093 84% 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 15,000 - 800 14,200 5% 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 205,000 8,261 18,581 186,419 9% 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 80,033 17,468 24,915 55,118 31% 111 STREET FUND 1,557,715 943,078 789,644 768,071 51% 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 6,464,984 705,577 616,371 5,848,613 10% 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 139,800 16,146 33,243 106,557 24% 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE - - - - 0% 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 68,500 31,396 31,295 37,205 46% 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,726 12,543 13,972 12,754 52% 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 4,000 2,943 2,206 1,794 55% 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 19,000 3,863 5,188 13,812 27% 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,286,500 209,864 86,655 1,199,845 7% 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 668,534 80,277 32,108 636,426 5% 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 32,317 1,443 20,594 11,723 64% 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 222,800 2,675 142,187 80,613 64% 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 152,761 87,723 73,504 79,257 48% 132 PARKS CONST RUCT ION FUND 2,093,200 331,075 24,946 2,068,254 1% 136 PARKS TRUST FUND - 6,930 - - 0% 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 4,600 2,834 278 4,322 6% 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 645,000 385,169 391,807 253,193 61% 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 22,130 106,000 - 22,130 0% 213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND - 244,000 - - 0% 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,009,902 - 92,264 917,638 9% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 9,201,851 N/A 3,531,979 5,669,872 38% 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 4,565,772 N/A 1,677,139 2,888,633 37% 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 18,168,019 N/A 6,614,628 11,553,391 36% 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,095,372 820,078 433,842 661,530 40% 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 108,790 55,372 56,550 52,240 52% $ 82,145,709 $ 23,136,154 $ 34,477,904 $ 47,667,805 42% "Due to the change in enterprise fund structure from 2012 to 2013, these expenditures are shown as N/A 2 Packet Page 107 of 895 Page 1 of 3 Title CITY OF EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2013 Amended 7/31/2012 7/31/2013 Amount Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received TAXES: REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX $ 9,781,109 $ 5,054,121 $ 5,618,173 $ 4,162,936 57% EMSPROPERTYTAX 2,775,282 1,569,029 1,740,842 1,034,440 63% VOTED PROPERTY TAX 916,103 496,907 553,904 362,199 60% LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 4,913,150 2,837,791 2,994,986 1,918,164 61% NATURAL GAS USE TAX 8,706 5,250 6,167 2,539 71% 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 520,417 301,301 324,210 196,207 62% ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 1,475,638 1,002,829 997,566 478,072 68% GASUTILITYTAX 811,174 595,099 505,954 305,220 62% SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 287,710 164,375 175,158 112,552 61% WAT ER UT ILIT Y T AX 904,613 467,026 510,809 393,804 56% SEWER UTILITY TAX 470,000 276,020 215,418 254,582 46% STORMWATER UTILITY TAX 274,600 151,809 226,822 47,778 83% T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 730,910 374,730 462,036 268,874 63% TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 1,529,498 918,807 823,494 706,004 54% PULLTABSTAX 61,385 39,915 37,689 23,696 61% AMUSEMENT GAMES 731 - 100 631 14% LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX 212,350 105,124 110,074 102,276 52% PENALTIES ONGAMBLINGTAXES - - - - 0% 25,673,376 14,360,133 15,303,403 10,369,973 60% LICENSES AND PERMTIS: FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE 5,555 5,313 4,990 565 90% PROF AND OCC LICENSE -TAXI 1,030 510 630 400 61% AMUSEMENTS 6,060 5,475 4,350 1,710 72% FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST 627,816 470,088 497,805 130,011 79% FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -VERIZON/FRONT IER 95,806 44,459 64,900 30,906 68% FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -BLACKROCK 8,287 7,332 8,556 (269) 103% FRANCHISE AGREMENT-ZAYO - - 5,000 (5,000) 0% OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 214,415 175,322 176,782 37,633 82% GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 106,297 95,945 99,933 6,364 94% DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 18,422 10,995 14,655 3,767 80% NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE 39,274 22,550 34,250 5,024 87% RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 9,500 9,308 9,773 (273) 103% BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 345,436 192,927 241,757 103,679 70% ANIMAL LICENSES 13,205 6,843 5,644 7,561 43% STREET AND CURB PERMIT 50,000 16,282 23,299 26,701 47% OTR NON -BUS LIC/PERMITS 7,070 5,897 6,569 502 93% 1,548,173 1,069,246 1,198,892 349,281 77% INTERGOVERNMENTAL: DOI 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 1,191 - 3,969 (2,778) 333% ROOFTOP SOLAR CHALLENGE GRANT 23,500 - 34,000 (10,500) 145% TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT 10,000 2,084 4,828 5,172 48% HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 6,000 406 776 5,224 13% SMART COMMUTER PROJECT GRANT - - 600 (600) 0% PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 185,181 - - 185,181 0% MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION 8,828 6,672 7,067 1,761 80% JUDICIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTION -STATE 12,572 6,224 6,268 6,304 50% CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS 33,290 25,116 26,360 6,930 79% DUI - CITIES 7,704 5,628 5,364 2,340 70% LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 20,000 146,591 - 20,000 0% LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 301,761 216,740 178,874 122,887 59% SHARED COURT COSTS 3,030 1,500 - 3,030 0% MUNICIPAL COURT AGREEMENT W/LYNNWOOD 1,500 750 - 1,500 0% 614,557 411,711 268,107 344,950 44% 3 Packet Page 108 of 895 Page 2 of 3 Title C ITY O F EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2013 Amended 7/31/2012 7/31/2013 Amount Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMTS 1,065 607 818 248 77% D/M COURT REC SER 172 82 47 125 28% MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 188 92 112 76 59% SALE MAPS & BOOKS 72 41 123 (51) 171% PHOTOCOPIES 4,572 1,994 1,324 3,248 29% POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 4,500 2,570 2,896 1,604 64% ASSESSMENT SEARCH 5 5 - 5 0% ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 100,000 59,660 122,684 (22,684) 123% ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES 1,011 - - 1,011 0% SNO-ISLE 57,236 41,718 58,636 (1,400) 102% PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 9,571 6,925 7,375 2,196 77% POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 26,000 11,974 12,190 13,810 47% OCDETF OVERTIME - 1,226 2,350 (2,350) 0% CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. 11,615 4,041 2,146 9,469 18% WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 36,000 11,723 21,295 14,705 59% MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 2,750 - - 2,750 0% DRE REIMBURSEABLE - - 709 (709) 0% DUI EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES 532 318 447 85 84% FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 27,808 43,622 40,768 (12,960) 147% ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 60,000 33,171 41,241 18,759 69% ELECTRONIC MONITOR DUI 165 82 590 (425) 358% BOOKING FEES 5,711 2,652 3,892 1,819 68% FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 5,577 2,910 3,355 2,222 60% EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 23,976 10,534 10,474 13,502 44% DUI EMERGENCY AID 67 33 - 67 0% EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 814,318 325,997 412,963 401,355 51% POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 496 281 125 371 25% CRIM CNV FEE DUI 698 382 402 296 58% CRIM CONV FEE CT 4,360 2,588 2,891 1,469 66% CRIM CONV FEE CN 1,624 930 1,105 519 68% FIBER SERVICES 36,438 20,309 19,180 17,258 53% INTERGOVERNMENTAL FIBER SERVICES 7,272 4,200 4,200 3,072 58% FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 213 182 528 (315) 248% ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 6,616 3,885 3,890 2,726 59% ZONINC/SUBDIVISION FEE 38,000 22,972 47,320 (9,320) 125% PLAN CHECKING FEES 216,457 137,557 155,438 61,019 72% FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 2,911 793 1,000 1,911 34% PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 1,200 326 966 234 81% S.E.P.A. REVIEW 5,000 1,940 4,365 635 87% CRITICAL AREA STUDY 12,000 8,060 11,315 685 94% DV COORDINATOR SERVICES 10,921 6,277 6,459 4,462 59% SWIM POOL ENTRANCE FEES 56,000 38,852 44,673 11,327 80% GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 5,500 3,194 3,637 1,863 66% LOCKERFEES 300 125 213 87 71% SWIM CLASS FEES 32,000 20,924 24,735 7,265 77% INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE-SSCCFH 69,300 34,650 - 69,300 0% PROGRAM FEES 780,000 477,200 511,071 268,929 66% TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 115,500 90,765 78,921 36,579 68% SWIM TEAM/DIVE TEAM 31,600 30,019 30,365 1,235 96% BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 660 140 - 660 0% INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS 1,520,248 905,102 983,519 536,729 65% 4,148,225 2,373,630 2,682,748 1,465,477 65% 4 Packet Page 109 of 895 Page 3 of 3 CITY OF EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND Title 2013 Amended Budget 7/31/2012 Revenues 7/31/2013 Revenues Amount Remaining %Received FINES AND FO RFEITURES : PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 10,214 5,792 7,783 2,431 76% TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 24,000 17,150 20,501 3,499 85% NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 213,000 149,354 180,439 32,561 85% CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA) 20,086 10,985 15,259 4,827 76% SPEEDINGDOUBLE 77 38 297 (220) 386% NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 2,034 900 - 2,034 0% OTHERINFRACTIONS'04 1,002 323 1,201 (199) 120% PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 31,592 19,985 29,686 1,906 94% PR -HANDICAPPED 794 - - 794 0% PARKING INFRACTION LOC 404 40 - 404 0% PARK/INDDISZONE 3,000 1,828 1,620 1,380 54% DWI PENALTIES 9,200 3,405 2,042 7,158 22% DUI - DP ACCT 415 770 1,539 (1,124) 371% OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN 8 189 - 8 0% CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 33,000 19,216 22,311 10,689 68% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT - - 363 (363) 0% OTHERNON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 539 241 61 478 11% OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 14,000 9,786 126 13,874 1% COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 1,491 585 1,061 430 71% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN - - 189 (189) 0% CRIMINAL COSTS-RECOUPMENTS 113,265 61,352 67,122 46,143 59% PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 40,000 17,940 17,534 22,466 44% COURT INTERPRETER COSTS 292 136 55 238 19% BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 7,444 3,885 3,855 3,589 52% MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 485 960 1,510 (1,025) 311% 526,342 324,860 374,553 151,789 71% MISCELLANEOUS: INVESTMENT INTEREST 8,000 4,492 1,324 6,676 17% INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 1,250 1,154 1,060 190 85% INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 5,491 3,091 2,187 3,304 40% PARKING 8,790 6,770 6,319 2,471 72% SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS 140,000 81,879 92,301 47,699 66% BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 3,040 2,545 3,740 (700) 123% LEASESLONG-TERM 143,000 94,153 98,191 44,809 69% VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 4,500 2,560 3,011 1,489 67% OTHER RENTS &USE CHARGES 6,200 3,745 6,481 (281) 105% PARKSDONATIONS 4,300 7,742 9,100 (4,800) 212% BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 1,400 900 1,200 200 86% PARKS GRANTS- PRIVATE SOURCES - - 1,235 (1,235) 0% SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 1,486 1,080 - 1,486 0% SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 1,750 920 2,542 (792) 145% CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY - - 358 (358) 0% OT HER JUDGEMENT SETTLEMENT - - 6,367 (6,367) 0% POLICE JUDGMENT S✓RESTITUTION 465 150 55 410 12% CASHIER'S OVERAGES/SHORTAGES 44 (3) (8) 52 -18% OTHER MISC REVENUES 3,000 5,103 2,572 428 86% SMALL OVERPAYMENT 66 55 30 36 45% NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 182 120 120 62 66% NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 978 383 550 428 56% NSF FEES - POLICE 91 - - 91 0% NSF FEES -DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT - - 120 (120) 0% FLEX -PLAN SERVICES FORFEITURES - - 1,368 (1,368) 0% 334,033 216,839 240,222 93,811 72% TRANSFERS -IN: INSURANCE RECOVERIES - - - - 0% INTERFUND TRANSFER -IN - - - - 0% INTERFUND TRANSFER- In (From 121) 25,086 19,473 12,543 12,543 50% INTERFUND TRANSFER (From 127) 12,297 - 12,297 - 100% 37,383 19,473 24,840 12,543 66% TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 32,882,089 $ 18,775,892 $ 20,092,766 $ 12,787,823 61% 5 Packet Page 110 of 895 Page 1 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Title SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME HOLIDAY BUY BACK BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE INSURANCE UTILITIES REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES ECA CONTINGENCY RESERVE EXCISE TAXES INTERFUND TRANSFER (009,111,112,116) MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL CAPITAL LEASES AND INSTALLMENT PURCHASES OTHER DEBT INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT DEBT ISSUE COSTS INTERFUND SERVICES INTERFUND RENTAL LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE(009) BENEFITS IN HOME LTC CLAIMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS RIS K MANAGEMENT RES ERVE FUND (011) MISCELLANEOUS HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUBFUND (016) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIRS& MAINTENANENCE [K�7►[.ti�:i�l�Jl�[�]��7:Z�alxiJll�.y DRUG INFO RCEMENTFUND (104) SUPPLIES FUEL CONSUMED SMALL EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR/MAINT MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVTLSVC 2013 Amended 7/31/2012 7/31/2013 Amount Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent $ 12,029,872 $ 6,843,572 $ 6,928,306 $ 5,101,566 58% 419,100 233,824 227,901 191,199 54% 193,388 2,526 3,481 189,907 2% 4,094,462 2,405,103 2,385,545 1,708,917 58% 61,110 33,800 29,753 31,357 49% 374,244 203,447 171,922 202,322 46% 117,050 96,881 58,633 58,417 50% 2,032,984 870,423 857,534 1,175,450 42% 204,660 100,456 100,259 104,401 49% 36,742 12,589 11,352 25,390 31% 40,865 21,213 17,249 23,616 42% 834,943 77,704 485,543 349,400 58% 396,193 420,109 397,566 (1,373) 100% 414,600 252,069 253,210 161,390 61% 320,547 154,285 158,557 161,990 49% 279,880 168,140 179,805 100,075 64% 8,099,655 5,846,073 5,780,158 2,319,497 71% 190,000 80,635 - 190,000 0% 5,500 3,588 3,178 2,322 58% 1,325,185 419,926 762,056 563,129 58% 85,000 - 22,735 62,265 27% 946,595 - - 946,595 0% 64,014 63,380 64,014 0 100% - - 478 (478) 0% 185,614 149,706 93,776 91,838 51% 5,000 1,125 - 5,000 0% 201,800 835 - 201,800 0% 48,000 250,985 28,000 20,000 58% 33,007,003 18,712,394 19,021,011 13,985,992 58076 $ 435,000 $ 256,756 $ 119,532 $ 315,468 27% 176,400 84,853 60,427 115,973 34% 8,000 7,186 6,081 1,919 76% - 250 250 (250) 0% 619,400 349,045 186,289 S 433,111 30% $ 661,000 $ $ 555,907 $ 105,093 84% 661,000 555,907 S 105,093 84% $ 2,000 $ $ $ 2,000 0% 2,000 2,000 0% 1,000 - 1,000 0% 10,000 - 800 9,200 8% 15,000 - 800 14,200 5% $ 10,000 $ - $ 919 $ 9,081 9% 20,000 4,825 11,116 8,884 56% 5,000 3,436 4,681 319 94% - - 1,865 (1,865) 0% 170,000 - - 170,000 0% 205,000 8,261 18,581 18,284 9% $ - $ - $ - $ - 0% 2,000 1,286 2,818 (818) 141% 5,000 - 5,048 (48) 101% 2,233 1,254 1,979 254 89% 800 - 10 790 1% 20,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 25% 50,000 9,928 10,061 39,939 20% 80,033 17,468 24,915 55,118 31% Packet Page 111 of 895 0 Page 2 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Title 2013 Amended Budget 7/31/2012 Expenditures 7/31/2013 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent STREETFUND (111) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 447,655 $ 308,009 $ 257,872 $ 189,783 58% OVERTIME 18,400 20,685 11,452 6,948 62% BENEFITS 197,283 137,176 112,994 84,289 57% UNIFORMS 6,000 4,450 3,674 2,326 61% SUPPLIES 240,000 91,660 77,125 162,875 32% SMALL EQUIPMENT 26,000 11,919 - 26,000 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,700 19,379 4,199 8,501 33% COMMUNICATIONS 3,500 2,139 1,595 1,905 46% TRAVEL 1,000 60 210 790 21% ADVERTISING 350 - 350 0% RENTAL/LEASE 159,134 1,435 93,615 65,519 59% INSURANCE 87,204 93,305 87,201 3 100% UTILITIES 267,750 126,102 126,058 141,692 47% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 45,000 4,479 11,331 33,669 25% MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 6,793 490 7,510 6% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 4,000 1,003 232 3,768 6% INTERFUND TRANSFER 28,650 558 28,092 2% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 3,015 - 3,015 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 2,074 3,100 1,037 1,037 50% INTEREFUND RENTAL - 111,384 - - 0% 1,557,715 943,078 789,644 768,071 51% COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE(112) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 1,272,100 $ 506,843 $ 336,473 $ 935,627 26% MISCELLANEOUS - 26,427 (26,427) 0% INTERFUND TRANSFER OUT (to 112,117) 378,500 41,694 41,498 337,003 11% LAND 909,400 - - 909,400 0% CONST SURFACE CONSI' PROJECTS 3,502,300 1,700 75,590 3,426,710 2% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,203 72,201 72,201 2 100% INTEREST ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 4,481 4,840 4,479 2 100% INTERFUND SERVICES 326,000 78,298 59,703 266,297 18% 6,464,984 705,576 616,371 5,848,613 10% MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) SUPPLIES $ 4,200 $ 165 $ 2,635 $ 1,565 63% SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 523 - 1,000 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 116,700 13,232 15,404 101,296 13% TRAVEL 50 10 54 (4) 108% ADVERTISING 4,000 - 5,550 (1,550) 139% RENTAL/LEASE 550 - 4,281 (3,731) 778% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 300 - - 300 0% MISCELLANEOUS 10,000 - 5,318 4,682 53% INTERFUND TRANSFER 3,000 2,216 - 3,000 0% 139,800 16,146 33,243 106,557 24% HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 14,500 $ 5,459 $ 8,182 $ 6,318 56% ADVERTISING 37,500 23,554 11,013 26,487 29% MISCELLANEOUS 2,500 384 100 2,400 4% INTERFUND TRANSFERS (to 117, 132) 14,000 2,000 12,000 2,000 86% 68,500 31,397 31,295 37,205 46% EMPLOYEE PARING PERMIT FUND (121) SUPPLIES $ 1,640 $ - $ 874 $ 766 53% SMALL EQUIPMENT - - 555 (555) 0% INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 001) 25,086 12,543 12,543 12,543 50% 26,726 12,543 S 13,972 12,754 52% YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) MISCELLANEOUS $ 4,000 $ 2,943 $ 2,206 $ 1,794 55% 4,000 2,943 2,206 1,794 55% TO URIS M PRO MO TIO NAL FUND/ARTS (123) PROFESSIONAL SVC $ 10,500 $ 33 $ 1,697 $ 8,803 16% ADVERTISING 4,500 3,830 605 3,895 13% MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 - 2,887 1,113 72% 19,000 $ 3,863 $ 5,188 $ 13,812 27% 7 Packet Page 112 of 895 Page 3 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Title REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (125) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE UTILITIES REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 132) CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INTERFUND SERVICES REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ (126) MISCELLANEOUS TRANSFER TO FUND 231 LAND GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS INTEREST GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 001) SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND (129) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INTERFUND SERVICES CEMETERY ETERY MAINTENANC UEMPRO VEM ENT (130) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE UTILITIES REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT INTERFUND RENTAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (132) SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INTERFUND TRANSFER CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS INTERFUND SERVICES PARKS TRUSTFUND (136) INTERFUND TRANSFER SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) SUPPLIES STUDENT TRIP MISCELLANEOUS TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT (139) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSURANCE INTERFUND TRANSFER INTERGOVTL SERVICES 2013 Amended 7/31/2012 7/31/2013 Amount Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent $ 29,000 $ 39,495 $ 45,693 $ (16,693) 158% 337,000 68,621 18,948 318,052 6% - - 148 (148) 0% - - 2,243 (2,243) 0% - - - - 0% 185,000 1,544 19,622 165,378 11% 635,500 - - 635,500 0% 100,000 100,203 - 100,000 0% - - - - 0% 1,286,500 209,863 86,655 1,199,845 7% $ - $ - $ - $ - 0% 438,910 16,540 26,071 412,839 6% 200,000 - 200,000 0% 17,550 - 17,550 0% 12,074 63,737 6,037 6,037 50% 668,534 80,277 32,108 $ 636,426 5% $ 14,020 $ 1,443 $ 1,743 $ 12,277 12% 6,000 - 6,553 (553) 109% 12,297 - 12,297 - 100% 32,317 1,443 20,594 11,723 64% $ 31,700 $ 1,833 $ 5,386 $ 26,314 17% 171,600 - 114,251 57,349 67% 19,500 841 22,549 (3,049) 116% 222,800 2,674 142,187 80,613 64% $ 68,605 $ 39,420 $ 40,209 $ 28,396 59% 3,500 1,690 1,600 1,900 46% 33,188 18,690 18,648 14,540 56% 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 7,000 2,558 464 6,536 7% 20,000 15,214 6,205 13,795 31% 1,000 200 200 800 20% 1,412 698 822 590 58% 500 - - 500 0% 3,000 1,456 839 2,161 28% 5,256 3,066 2,190 58% 3,800 1,512 - 3,800 0% 500 - 500 0% 4,000 2,049 1,451 2,549 36% - - - 0% - 4,235 - - 0% 152,761 87,722 $ 73,504 79,257 48% $ - $ 72,779 $ - $ - 0% 1,907,500 50,480 23,832 1,883,668 1% - - - 0% 182,700 188,540 - 182,700 0% 3,000 19,276 1,114 1,886 37% 2,093,200 331,075 24,946 2,068,254 1% $ - $ 6,930 $ - $ - 0% - 6,930 - 0% $ 500 $ 1,242 $ 144 $ 356 29% 2,600 - - 2,600 0% 1,500 1,592 135 1,366 9% 4,600 2,834 278 4,322 6% $ - $ - $ 1,756 $ (1,756) 0% 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 100% 640,000 330,233 385,051 254,949 60% - 49,936 - - 0% 645,000 385,169 391,807 253,193 61% Packet Page 113 of 895 Page 4 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Title LID FUND CONTROL (211) INTERFUND TRANSFER LIMITED TAX G.O. BOND FUND (234) 2002 BOND INTEREST 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231) GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND INTEREST DEBT ISSUE COSTS WATER FUND (421) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES FUEL CONSUMED WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE INSURANCE UTILITIES REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES INTERFUND TAXES INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 117,414) MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS REVENUE BONDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST DEBT ISSUE COSTS OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS INTERFUND SERVICES INTERFUND REPAIR 2013 Amended 7/31/2012 7/31/2013 Amount Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent $ 22,130 $ 106,000 $ - $ 22,130 0% 22,130 106,000 - 22,130 0% 136,786 $ - $ - 0% S - a lJv,/Ov ID - a - v70 $ 825,372 $ $ - $ 825,372 0% 184,530 92,264 92,266 50% - - - - 0% 1,009,902 - 92,264 917,638 0% $ 756,455 N/A $ 420,370 $ 336,085 56% 24,180 N/A 11,631 12,549 48% 285,866 N/A 174,336 111,530 61% 6,840 N/A 3,735 3,105 55% 143,505 N/A 55,249 88,256 38% - N/A - - 0% 1,725,000 N/A 664,921 1,060,079 39% 140,000 N/A 54,814 85,186 39% 10,400 N/A 5,432 4,968 52% 173,136 N/A 165,375 7,761 96% 30,280 N/A 19,363 10,917 64% 3,400 N/A - 3,400 0% 560 N/A - 560 0% 91,205 N/A 53,544 37,661 59% 67,699 N/A 67,607 92 100% 28,000 N/A 20,507 7,493 73% 24,160 N/A 1,675 22,485 7% 307,630 N/A 180,793 126,837 59% 30,000 N/A 15,448 14,552 51% 904,893 N/A 510,809 394,084 56% 927,500 N/A - 927,500 0% 85,000 N/A - 85,000 0% 2,532,580 N/A 661,018 1,871,562 26% 2,025 N/A - 2,025 0% 209,471 N/A - 209,471 0% 45,839 N/A 45,839 0 100% 280,306 N/A 140,928 139,378 50% 16,553 N/A - 16,553 0% - N/A 175 (175) 0% 349,368 N/A 258,362 91,006 74% - N/A 48 (48) 0% 9,201,851 S 3,531,979 5,669,920 38% *Due to the change in enterprise fund structure from 2012 to 2013, these expenditures are shown as N/A M Packet Page 114 of 895 Page 5 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Title STORM FUND (422) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE INSURANCE UT ILIT ES REPAIR & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT INTERFUND TRANSFER (to 112, 117) CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS REVENUE BONDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS INTERFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER FUND (423) SALARIES AND WAGES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES FUEL CONSUMED SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE INSURANCE UTILITIES REPAIR & MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT INTERFUND TRANSFERS (to 414, 423) MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS REVENUE BONDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS INTEREST DEBT ISSUE COSTS OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS INTERFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2013 Amended 7/31/2012 7/31/2013 Amount Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %, Spent $ 568,591 N/A $ 304,470 $ 264,121 54% 6,000 N/A 6,584 (584) 110% 232,141 N/A 125,969 106,172 54% 6,540 N/A 4,568 1,972 70% 50,000 N/A 22,398 27,602 45% 4,400 N/A 164 4,236 4% 599,190 N/A 388,525 210,665 65% 3,480 N/A 945 2,535 27% 4,300 N/A 864 3,436 20% 500 N/A - 500 0% 217,412 N/A 126,418 90,994 58% 8,418 N/A 8,407 11 100% 10,000 N/A 5,358 4,642 54% 11,860 N/A 5,962 5,898 50% 106,100 N/A 57,353 48,747 54% 45,000 N/A 21,255 23,745 47% 291,600 N/A 164,034 127,566 56% 237,766 N/A - 237,766 0% 1,458,400 N/A - 1,458,400 0% 101,469 N/A - 101,469 0% 82,906 N/A - 82,906 0% 32,063 N/A 32,063 1 100% 187,245 N/A 94,584 92,661 51% - N/A 83 (83) 0% 300,391 N/A 307,136 (6,745) 102% 4,565,772 1,677,139 2,888,633 37% $ 1,653,859 N/A $ 894,211 $ 759,648 54% 73,000 N/A 57,118 15,882 78% 677,979 N/A 371,627 306,352 55% 11,190 N/A 7,511 3,679 67% 482,505 N/A 136,050 346,455 28% 90,000 N/A 91,846 (1,846) 102% 3,000 N/A - 3,000 0% 16,400 N/A 9,663 6,737 59% 1,124,996 N/A 699,034 425,962 62% 40,280 N/A 21,134 19,146 52% 7,400 N/A - 7,400 0% 2,500 N/A - 2,500 0% 133,736 N/A 77,046 56,690 58% 157,117 N/A 156,092 1,025 99% 931,200 N/A 566,564 364,636 61% 90,000 N/A 76,120 13,880 85% 211,100 N/A 118,636 92,464 56% 290,000 N/A 82,726 207,274 29% 470,000 N/A 278,206 191,794 59% 1,125,280 N/A - 1,125,280 0% 141,000 N/A - 141,000 0% 9,137,750 N/A 2,420,546 6,717,204 26% 189,978 N/A - 189,978 0% 222,625 N/A - 222,625 0% 138,939 N/A 143,620 (4,681) 103% 131,045 N/A 69,705 61,340 53% 16,551 N/A - 16,551 0% - N/A 41 (41) 0% 598,589 N/A 337,132 261,457 56% 18,168,019 6,614,628 11,553,391 36% *Due to the change in enterprise fund structure from 2012 to 2013, these expenditures are shown as N/A 10 Packet Page 115 of 895 Page 6 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Title 2013 Amended Budget 7/31/2012 Expenditures 7/31/2013 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) SALARIES AND WAGES $ 228,064 $ 124,508 $ 96,425 $ 131,639 42% OVERTIME 1,000 91 886 114 89% BENEFITS 100,397 59,801 44,265 56,132 44% UNIFORMS 1,000 470 502 498 50% SUPPLIES 76,000 53,973 58,028 17,972 76% FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 674 - 1,000 0% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 321,800 190,583 102,387 219,413 32% SMALL EQUIPMENT 8,000 4,815 3,064 4,936 38% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000 372 1,343 (343) 134% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 814 745 2,255 25% RENTAL/LEASE 9,996 6,751 5,419 4,577 54% INSURANCE 34,083 32,530 34,153 (70) 100% UTILITIES 14,000 7,436 7,244 6,756 52% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 60,000 19,033 28,180 31,820 47% MISCELLANEOUS 6,000 3,926 3,965 2,035 66% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,500 1,338 310 2,190 12% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 217,532 312,962 46,927 170,605 22% INTERFUND SERVICES 10,000 - - 10,000 0% 1,095,372 820,077 433,842 661,530 40% FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND (617) BENEFITS $ 63,000 $ 33,227 $ 16,527 $ 46,473 26% PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 43,790 21,081 38,854 4,936 89% PROF SERVICES 2,000 1,065 1,169 831 58% 108,790 55,373 S 56,550 S 52,240 52% TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS 82,145,709 23,028,937 34,477,904 47,485,517 42% 11 Packet Page 116 of 895 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY Title 2013 Amended Budget 7/31/2012 Expenditures 7/31/2013 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL $ 273,623 $ 149,229 $ 152,370 $ 121,253 56% OFFICE OF MAYOR 238,374 132,538 136,909 101,465 57% HUMAN RESOURCES 287,190 136,806 148,360 138,830 52% MUNICIPAL COURT 729,506 426,425 408,529 320,977 56% CITY CLERK 586,831 289,704 299,585 287,246 51% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1,492,018 777,501 814,507 677,511 55% CITY ATTORNEY 499,200 286,492 284,215 214,985 57% NON -DEPARTMENTAL 11,467,569 6,952,172 7,050,688 4,416,881 61% POLICE SERVICES 8,931,185 4,842,275 4,972,804 3,958,381 56% COMMUNITY SERVICES 373,314 249,575 204,034 169,280 55% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1,642,542 906,200 904,561 737,981 55% PARKS& RECREATION 3,422,517 1,877,276 1,896,279 1,526,238 55% PUBLIC WORKS 1,718,975 926,412 985,709 733,266 57% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,344,159 759,794 762,458 581,701 57% $ 33,007,003 $ 18,712,399 $ 19,021,011 $ 13,985,992 58% CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY Title 2013 Amended Budget 7/31/2012 Expenditures 7/31/2013 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent WATER UTILITYFUND $ 9,201,851 N/A $ 3,531,979 $ 5,669,872 38% STORM UTILITY FUND 4,565,772 N/A 1,677,139 2,888,633 37% SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 18,168,019 N/A 6,614,628 11,553,391 36% $ 31,935,642 $ 11,823,746 $ 20,111,896 37% *Due to the change in enterprise fund structure from 2012 to 2013, these expenditures are shown as N/A 12 Packet Page 117 of 895 Page 1 of 4 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Title 2013 Amended Budget 7/31/2012 Expenditures 7/31/2013 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL SALARIES $ 114,618 $ 62,119 $ 68,787 $ 45,831 60% OVERTIME 2,000 3,537 344 1,656 17% BENEFITS 68,165 41,794 40,663 27,502 60% SUPPLIES 1,000 553 151 849 15% PROFESSIONAL SVC 53,082 32,158 34,427 18,655 65% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,558 1,561 1,439 52% TRAVEL 2,500 879 436 2,064 17% RENTAL/LEASE 490 281 266 224 54% REPAIRS/MAINT 1,500 - 55 1,445 4% MISCELLANEOUS 27,268 6,350 5,681 21,587 21% $ 273,623 $ 149,229 $ 152,370 $ 121,253 56% OFFICEOFMAYOR SALARIES $ 183,722 $ 103,745 $ 108,492 $ 75,230 59% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS 41,852 23,979 24,517 17,335 59% SUPPLIES 2,000 421 927 1,073 46% PROFESSIONAL SVC 1,500 - 59 1,441 4% COMMUNICATION 1,400 652 510 890 36% TRAVEL 2,000 711 481 1,519 24% RENTAL/LEASE 2,400 1,429 1,319 1,081 55 % REPAIR/MAINT 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 3,000 1,601 605 2,395 20% $ 238,374 $ 132,538 $ 136,909 $ 101,465 57% HUMAN RESOURCES SALARIES $ 169,000 $ 51,287 $ 94,419 $ 74,581 56% OVERTIME - - - - 0% BENEFITS 61,680 19,218 28,333 33,347 46% SUPPLIES 2,000 1,477 2,294 (294) 115% SMALL EQUIPMENT 100 - - 100 0% PROFESSIONAL SVC 32,000 55,219 11,351 20,649 35% COMMUNICATIONS 500 214 266 234 53% TRAVEL 500 - 572 (72) 114% ADVERTISING 5,000 683 1,642 3,358 33% RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 1,353 1,300 700 65% REPAIR/MAINT 6,000 4,820 5,349 651 89% MISCELLANEOUS 8,410 2,535 2,836 5,574 34% $ 287,190 $ 136,806 $ 148,360 $ 138,830 52% MUNIC IPAL C O URT SALARIES $ 464,471 $ 272,333 $ 265,607 $ 198,864 57% OVERTIME 100 572 - 100 0% BENEFITS 168,526 99,935 88,240 80,286 52% SUPPLIES 9,159 6,491 4,852 4,307 53% SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,000 - 1,003 997 50% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 60,500 31,085 38,761 21,739 64% COMMUNICATIONS 2,600 1,264 1,183 1,417 45 % TRAVEL 1,250 1,517 1,652 (402) 132% RENTAL/LEASE 650 385 556 94 86% REPAIR/MAINT 1,000 961 409 591 41% MISCELLANEOUS 19,250 11,790 6,267 12,983 33% INTERGOVTL SVC - 92 - - 0% $ 729,506 $ 426,425 $ 408,529 $ 320,977 56% 13 Packet Page 118 of 895 Page 2 of 4 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Title 2013 Amended Budget 7/31/2012 Expenditures 7/31/2013 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent C ITY CLERK SALARIES AND WAGES $ 305,572 $ 167,815 $ 179,313 $ 126,259 59% BENEFITS 92,771 52,636 54,705 38,066 59% SUPPLIES 13,760 5,509 3,721 10,039 27% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 84,751 10,949 11,595 73,156 14% COMMUNICATIONS 50,000 20,208 27,866 22,134 56% TRAVEL 250 7 36 214 15% ADVERTISING 3,690 12,998 2,287 1,403 62% RENTAL/LEASE 25,000 9,548 9,351 15,649 37% REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 8,037 7,778 8,210 (173) 102% MISCELLANEOUS 3,000 2,256 2,500 500 83% $ 586,831 $ 289,704 $ 299,585 $ 287,246 51% ADMINIS TRATIVE S ERVIC ES SALARIES $ 618,370 $ 414,764 $ 385,701 $ 232,669 62% OVERTIME 8,000 5,250 5,837 2,163 73% BENEFITS 220,100 129,741 120,719 99,381 55% SUPPLIES 35,700 23,138 10,707 24,993 30% SMALL EQUIPMENT 87,500 55,478 51,299 36,201 59% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 186,350 22,823 94,187 92,163 51% COMMUNICATIONS 58,960 35,802 29,930 29,030 51% TRAVEL 3,300 1,108 279 3,021 8% RENTAL/LEASE 8,988 3,193 5,027 3,961 56% REPAIR/MAINT 171,750 75,226 76,406 95,344 44% MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 10,978 11,683 (3,683) 146% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 85,000 - 22,735 62,265 27% $ 1,492,018 $ 777,501 $ 814,507 $ 677,511 55% CITY ATTO RNEY PROFESSIONAL SVC $ 499,200 $ 286,292 $ 284,215 $ 214,985 57% MISC PROSECUTOR - 200 - - 0% $ 499,200 $ 286,492 $ 284,215 $ 214,985 57% NON -DEPARTMENTAL SALARIES $ 136,000 $ - $ - $ 136,000 0% BENEFITS -UNEMPLOYMENT 40,000 33,756 16,680 23,320 42% PROFESSIONAL SVC 380,000 136,957 118,624 261,376 31% COMMUNICATIONS - 4 - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE 3,600 3,600 3,600 - 100% INSURANCE 396,193 420,109 397,566 (1,373) 100% MISCELLANEOUS 55,156 40,023 40,065 15,091 73% INTERGOVT SVC 7,532,912 5,599,363 5,550,650 1,982,262 74% ECA LOAN PAYMENT 190,000 80,635 - 190,000 0% EXCISE TAXES 5,500 3,588 3,178 2,322 58% INTERFUND TRANSFERS 1,325,185 419,926 762,056 563,129 58% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 946,595 - - 946,595 0% INSTALLMENT PURCHASES 64,014 63,380 64,014 0 100% OTHER DEBT - - - - 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 185,614 149,706 93,776 91,838 51% DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS 5,000 1,125 - 5,000 0% FISCAL AGENT FEES - - 478 (478) 0% INTERFUND SERVICES 201,800 - - 201,800 0% $ 11,467,569 $ 6,952,172 $ 7,050,688 $ 4,416,881 61% 14 Packet Page 119 of 895 Page 3 of 4 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Title PO LIC E S ERVIC ES SALARIES OVERTIME HOLIDAY BUYBACK BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SVC COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE REPAIR/MAINT MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVTL SVC INT ERFUND RENTAL INTERFUND REPAIRS COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMIN SALARIES BENEFITS SUPPLIES SMALL EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SVC COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE REPAIR/MAINT MISCELLANEOUS DEVELOPMENT S ERVIC ES/PLANNING SALARIES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES MINOR EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SVC COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE MISCELLANEOUS ENGINEERING SALARIES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES MINOR EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SVC COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE REPAIR/MAINT MISCELLANEOUS 2013 Amended 7/31/2012 7/31/2013 Amount Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %S $ 5,169,010 $ 2,966,012 $ 2,982,988 $ 2,186,022 58% 400,000 215,060 216,547 183,453 54% 193,388 2,526 3,481 189,907 2% 1,728,703 1,031,839 1,044,850 683,853 60% 52,410 30,592 26,416 25,994 50% 94,100 51,089 35,761 58,339 38% 14,300 3,804 2,639 11,661 18% 95,200 52,827 55,470 39,730 58% 33,592 14,621 12,395 21,197 37% 16,300 6,526 6,640 9,660 41% 375 66 36 339 10% 538,344 9,076 312,531 225,813 58% 16,115 4,076 5,139 10,976 32% 35,300 24,598 15,402 19,898 44% 496,048 241,673 224,508 271,540 45% 48,000 187,110 28,000 20,000 58% - 780 - - 0% $ 8,931,185 $ 4,842,275 $ 4,972,804 $ 3,958,381 56% $ 213,304 $ 122,737 $ 124,646 $ 88,659 58% 62,052 36,346 36,795 25,257 59% 1,500 1,531 338 1,162 23% 800 - - 800 0% 60,804 81,637 35,704 25,100 59% 1,490 490 907 583 61% 2,000 18 17 1,983 1% 24,500 3,210 1,950 22,550 8% 2,364 1,725 1,510 854 64% 500 - 500 0% 4,000 1,881 2,169 1,832 54% $ 373,314 $ 249,575 $ 204,034 $ 169,280 55% $ 1,032,549 $ 606,419 $ 618,898 $ 413,651 60% 1,300 2,215 25 1,275 2% 358,465 216,874 212,900 145,565 59% - - - - 0% 13,000 6,417 6,172 6,828 47% 1,100 231 - 1,100 0% 169,100 37,759 30,697 138,403 18% 4,000 3,124 2,627 1,373 66% 1,600 426 45 1,555 3% 3,000 1,397 2,370 630 79% 32,828 16,865 19,152 13,676 58% 500 606 - 500 0% 25,100 13,867 11,675 13,425 47% $ 1,642,542 $ 906,200 $ 904,561 $ 737,981 55% $ 1,007,140 $ 547,226 $ 568,927 $ 438,213 56% 5,000 551 1,199 3,801 24% 342,150 192,985 207,267 134,883 61% 360 - - 360 0% - - - - 0% 2,000 2,398 403 1,597 20% 5,000 2,596 840 4,160 17% 6,700 3,157 3,147 3,553 47% 600 463 10 590 2% - - 264 (264) 0% 13,408 3,934 7,819 5,589 58% 1,800 895 38 1,762 2% 10,300 5,516 5,655 4,645 55% $ 1,394,458 $ 759,721 $ 795,569 $ 598,889 57% Packet Page 120 of 895 15 Page 4 of 4 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DEIAAIL Title PARKS & REC REATIO N SALARIES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES MINOR EQUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SVC COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL ADVERTISING RENTAL/LEASE PUBLIC UTILITY REPAIR/MAINT MISCELLANEOUS INTERGOVTL SVC PUBLIC WORKS SALARIES OVERTIME BENEFITS SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRAVEL RENTAL/LEASE PUBLIC UTILITY REPAIR/MAINT MISCELLANEOUS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SALARIES OVERTIME BENEFITS UNIFORMS SUPPLIES TRAVEL MINOR EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS RENTAL/LEASE PUBLIC UTILITY REPAIR/MAINT MISCELLANEOUS TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 2013 Amended 7/31/2012 7/31/2013 Amount Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining % Spent $ 1,769,631 $ 1,053,853 $ 1,024,886 $ 744,745 58% - 5,325 3,844 (3,844) 0% 584,326 345,960 338,271 246,055 58% 5,340 1,934 2,415 2,925 45% 131,925 62,824 66,732 65,193 51% 3,250 33,568 1,820 1,430 56% 405,297 120,093 141,574 263,723 35% 28,218 11,035 11,104 17,114 39% 5,942 899 1,183 4,759 20% 4,300 2,859 8,698 (4,398) 202% 149,152 74,100 94,081 55,071 63% 135,000 90,133 92,154 42,846 68% 51,845 25,973 30,887 20,958 60% 77,596 43,720 73,631 3,965 95% 70,695 5,000 5,000 65,695 7% $ 3,422,517 $ 1,877,276 $ 1,896,279 $ 1,526,238 55% $ 225,381 $ 122,149 $ 142,769 $ 82,612 63% 200 - - 200 0% 76,157 37,451 38,869 37,288 51% 5,100 2,776 3,139 1,961 62% 200 29 30 170 15% 1,200 680 956 244 80% 500 - - 500 0% 10,779 1,706 2,542 8,237 24% 2,600 1,378 1,410 1,190 54% 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 1,400 522 424 976 30% $ 324,517 $ 166,691 $ 190,140 $ 134,377 59% $ 621,104 $ 353,114 $ 362,875 $ 258,229 58% 2,500 1,314 105 2,395 4% 249,515 142,592 132,735 116,780 53% 3,000 1,274 921 2,079 31% 65,000 41,221 37,131 27,869 57% - 35 - - 0% 6,000 1,401 1,469 4,531 24% 13,000 7,647 7,808 5,192 60% 44,940 14,385 26,490 18,450 59% 277,000 160,558 159,646 117,354 58% 60,000 33,950 32,065 27,935 53% 2,100 2,303 1,214 886 58% $ 1,344,159 $ 759,794 $ 762,458 $ 581,701 57% $ 33,007.003 $ 18,712,399 $ 19,021,011 $ 13,985,992 58% Packet Page 121 of 895 16 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund 2013 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 1,216,880 $ 1,216,880 $ 1,818,957 49.48% February 3,003,955 1,787,075 3,696,503 23.05% 30000000 March 5,073,436 2,069,480 5,680,288 11.96% 24000000 April 7,694,483 2,621,047 9,354,134 21.57% May 15,067,191 7,372,709 16,512,344 9.59% 18000000 June 16,717,578 1,650,387 18,269,525 9.28% July 18,644,184 1,926,606 20,092,766 7.77% 12000000 August 20,255,129 1,610,945 6000000 September 21,832,160 1,577,031 General Fund October 24,512,598 2,680,438 0 November 31,225,742 6,713,144 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC December 32,882,089 1,656,347 --*--Current Year Budget-iw-PriorYeaz City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax 2013 Real Estate Excise Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 55,778 $ 55,778 $ 69,441 24.49% February 90,478 34,700 115,535 27.69% March 125,274 34,796 257,285 105.38% April 181,702 56,428 311,272 71.31% May 237,805 56,103 353,545 48.67% June 293,909 56,104 444,366 51.19% July 353,267 59,358 535,072 51.46% August 420,422 67,155 September 484,359 63,937 October 552,822 68,463 November 607,861 55,039 December 650,000 42,139 Real Estate Excise Tax 1000000 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 , JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget -dr-- Prior Year Packet Page 122 of 895 17 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax 2013 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance BudeetForecast BudeetForecast Actuals % January $ February March April May June July August September October November December 392,903 $ 882,320 1,238,984 1,604,214 2,031,089 2,415,896 2,803,625 3,252,578 3,657,014 4,072,784 4,526,767 4,913,150 392,903 $ 406,956 3.58% �uuuuuu 489,417 894,736 1.41% 4000000 356,664 1,265,893 2.17% 365,230 1,641,662 2.33% 3000000 426,875 2,155,612 6.13% 384,807 2,570,795 6.41% 2000000 387,729 2,994,986 6.83% 1000000 448,952 404,436 0 Sales and Use Tax 415,770 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 453,983 386,383 Current Year Budget -*-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Gas Utility Tax 2013 Gas Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 112,486 $ 112,486 $ 94,836 -15.69% February 229,224 116,737 220,665 -3.73% March 336,151 106,927 303,170 -9.81% April 429,023 92,872 369,694 -13.83% May 504,596 75,573 437,820 -13.23% June 561,065 56,469 473,725 -15.57% July 603,809 42,744 505,954 -16.21% August 634,288 30,479 September 661,890 27,602 October 691,093 29,203 November 739,711 48,618 December 811,174 71,463 Gas Utility Tax 900000 800000 700000 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget t Prior Year Packet Page 123 of 895 18 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Telephone Utility Tax 2013 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ February March April May June July August September October November December 107,059 $ 232,047 373,485 490,181 620,774 737,081 866,748 1,002,235 1,103, 617 1,258,978 1,352,112 1,529,498 Telephone Utility Tax 1600000 107,059 $ 134,596 25.72% 1400000 124,988 252,444 8.79% 1200000 141,439 366,495 -1.87% 116,696 484,087 -1.24% 1000000 130,593 598,247 -3.63% 800000 116,307 712,861 -3.29% 600000 129,667 823,494 -4.99% 135,487 400000 101,382 200000 155,360 0 93,134 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 177,386 ---*--Current Year Budget -vr- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Electric Utility Tax 2013 Dectric Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ February March April May June July August September October November December 157,586 $ 317,215 474,628 629,668 770,457 880,143 988,232 1,081,536 1,180, 052 1,266,232 1,372,866 1,475,638 Electric Utility Tax 1600000 157,586 $ 153,240 -2.76% 1400000 159,628 326,077 2.79% 157,413 487,478 2.71% 1200000 155,040 641,845 1.93% 1000000 140,789 787,005 2.15% 800000 109,686 897,904 2.02% 600000 108,088 997,566 0.94% 93,304 400000 98,516 200000 86,180 0 106,634 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 102,772 Current Year Budget t Prior Year Packet Page 124 of 895 19 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales 2013 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 347,623 $ 347,623 $ 437,117 25.74% February 651,849 304,227 730,089 12.00% March 1,067,462 415,613 1,164,370 9.08% April 1,359,550 292,088 1,452,341 6.83% May 1,783,049 423,499 1,878,909 5.38% June 2,093,928 310,879 2,208,023 5.45% July 2,569,516 475,588 2,731,972 6.32% August 2,993,552 424,036 September 3,592,341 598,790 October 4,018,622 426,281 November 4,521,753 503,131 December 4,837,500 315,747 Meter Water Sales 1000000 0 ! JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget -*-- Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales 2013 Storm Water Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ February March April May June July August September October November December 117,844 $ 579,476 793,715 984,066 1,198, 804 1,389,306 1,605,385 2,081,108 2,302,939 2,499,013 2,719,600 2,916,000 117,844 $ 206,626 -2.76% /:)vvvuu 461,633 650,563 2.79% 2000000 214,239 857,252 2.71% 190,351 1,041,396 1.93% 1500000 214,738 1,248,687 2.15% 190,502 1,432,755 2.02% 1000000 216,078 1,640,860 2.21% 500000 475,723 221 831 Storm Water Sales ' 0 196,074 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 220,586 196,400 Current Year Budget -*I'- Prior Year Packet Page 125 of 895 20 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2013 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly YrD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % Unmeter Sewer Sales January $ February March April May June July August September October November December 368,573 $ 739,189 1,192,379 1,561,692 2,020,421 2,393,961 2,860,441 3,236,691 3,711,615 4,088,150 4,558,319 4,935,000 5000000 368,573 $ 430,475 16.80% 370,616 776,988 5.11% 4000000 453,190 1,208,782 1.38% 369,313 1,556,465 -0.33% 3000000 458,729 1,988,901 -1.56% 373,540 2,339,183 -2.29% 2000000 466,480 2,784,857 -2.64% 376,249 1000000 474,925 376,535 0 470,169 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 376,681 Current Year Budget t Prior Year Packet Page 126 of 895 21 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Summary As of July 31, 2013 Agency/Issuer Investment Ty Washington State Local Investment Pool Government Investment Pool Opus Bank Certificate of Deposit FHLMC Bonds FHLMC Bonds FFCB Bonds TOTAL Investment Mix State Investment Pool Certificate of Deposit Bonds (a) To maturityor call date, whichever occurs first. (a) Term Purchase Purchase Maturity/Call ** Yield to Weighted months) Date Price Date Maturity Average Various $17,303,679 Various 0.12% 0.100% 24 9/17/2012 500,000 9/17/2014 0.60% 0.014% 60 12/28/2012 1,000,000 9/28/2013 ** 0.90% 0.043% 54 12/27/2012 1,000,000 9/27/2013 ** 0.75% 0.036% 45 12/19/2012 1,000,000 8/18/2013 ** 0.54% 0.026% % of Total Summary 83.2% Current 6-month treasury rate 2.4% Current State Pool rate 14.4% Blended Edmonds rate 100.0% 0.22% 0.219% 0.08% 0.12% 0.22% Packet Page 127 of 895 22 AM-6106 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: Submitted By: 10 Minutes Roger Neumaier Department: Finance Review Committee: Finance Type: Action Information Committee Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Subject Title Recommendation for Department Presentations During 2014 Council Budget Process Recommendation This proposal for Department presentations to the Finance Committee was passed forward to the City Council for discussion for adoption and possible revision. Previous Council Action Council Finance Committee reviewed this proposal on September 1 Oth and recommended carrying it forward to the whole Council for consideration. Narrative The proposed schedule for budget review and adoption by the Council of the Mayor's recommended budget is summarized below: 10/1 Mayor's presentation of proposed 2014 City Budget. 10/22 Department presentations 10/29 Department presentations 11/4 Council Budget Public Hearing 11/12 Possible Budget Work Session* 11/19 Council Budget Adoption *Council may choose to schedule a Budget Work Session on November 12 following earlier than usual scheduled committee meetings. The Budget Work Session would allow Council members to discuss the proposed budget and possible amendments. Public testimony will be taken on the budget workshops and at the Council Public Hearing on the 4th. The first workshop would begin with a summary review of the 2014 budget compared to the 2013 budget. Particular attention would be focused upon the economic projection, a multi -year strategic forecast for the City's General Fund and its fund balances, and review and explanation of the major changes in revenues and expenditures in the 2014 budget. Packet Page 128 of 895 Each department will make a brief presentation on their budget. Departments will be encouraged to use PowerPoint presentations as appropriate. The Public Works Department will make three presentations: One for Streets, one for the three Utilities, and one for Facilities Maintenance, ER&R, and Engineering. Finance's proposal for the format for these budget presentations by each department is shown below. a. Up to three minute presentation on department's 2013 accomplishments. b. A brief review of the business challenges and uncertainties for the department in the coming year. c. A brief review comparing department's year end projected actual expenditures and revenues to budgeted levels with an explanation of how and why there are material differences between the projected actuals and the budgeted appropriations. d. A brief review of what is different about the 2014 budget proposal than the current budget. This review should emphasize decision packages, why those changes and decision packages are being recommended and what will be the impact on outcomes to the City and its citizens. e. Responses to Council questions regarding their department's budget. A proposed schedule of presentations is listed below: October 22nd: 1. Municipal Court; 2. City Clerk; 3. Mayor's Office; 4. Council; 5. Human Resources; 6. Economic Development; 7. Finance & Information Services; 8. Nondepartmental (Presented by Finance); 9. Development Services; and 10. Parks. October 29th: 1. Police; 2. Public Works Utilities; 3. Public Works Roads; and 4. Public Works Administration, Facilities Maintenance, ER&R & Engineering. To the extent that the 22nd session presentations overrun available time, remaining departments may be deferred to October 29th. Inbox City Clerk Mayor Finalize for Agenda Form Started By: Roger Neumaier Final Approval Date: 09/12/2013 Reviewed By Sandy Chase Dave Earling Sandy Chase Form Review Date 09/11/2013 02:44 PM 09/12/2013 04:33 PM 09/12/2013 04:57 PM Started On: 09/11/2013 01:42 PM Packet Page 129 of 895 AM-6107 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: Submitted By: 10 Minutes Roger Neumaier Department: Finance Review Committee: Finance Type: Information Information Subject Title City Assets invested in the County Investment Pool J Committee Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Recommendation Council review approach and indicate support if they are in agreement with the approach. Previous Council Action On September loth, the Council Finance Committee heard this approach and recommended that an information presentation to the entire Council be made. Narrative The City Investment Policy emphasizes prudent investments with the primary objectives being (in priority order): 1. Safety; 2. Liquidity; and 3. Return on Investment. Interest rates have been significantly down from historical levels since 2008. In 2013, partly due to low interest rates and partly due to change in key personnel, funds in bank balances (for which we receive credits to be applied to services incurred, but for which no interest will be received) and in the State Treasurer's Local Government Investment Program (for which we are currently receiving interest of 0.12% annually) have grown. We also have $3 million in bonds earning between 0.54% and 0.90%. These bonds all mature in the next month. The options facing the City are to: • Invest in bonds which can include risk and if done on a broader basis requires a higher level of staffing that the City currently has; • Continue to invest in the State Local Government Investment Program earning 0.1 %; or • Identify a different model which would meet the City's investment policy guidelines and produce a higher investment yield. We have identified an outstanding approach which meets the criteria in the "different model option". The Snohomish County Investment Pool (SCIP) is a portfolio of a combination of investments with varying Packet Page 130 of 895 maturities designed to control investment risk and maximize earnings. The portfolio has an average maturity of more than 90 days. It has been established to provide Snohomish County and Districts a tool for investment of cash from operations, capital funds and bond proceeds. Total Investments in the County pool are currently at $369 million. Participants may include, but are not limited to districts, (such as the following: school, fire, port, drainage, road improvement, emergency management, fire districts) cities, transportation agencies and other public entities who desire to participate. State Pool SCIP 2006 4.96% 5.14% 2007 4.71 % 4.87% 2008 2.68% 3.82% 2009 0.70% 2.81 % 2010 0.27% 1.88% 2011 0.17% 1.30% 2012 0.17% 1.00% 2 year Treasury Note 4.77% 4.31 % 2.19% 0.94% 0.67% 0.44% 0.27% The average annualized investment fee is currently 6.5 basis points (.065%). The County's Investment Policy is consistent with the City's policy. The County Finance Director is authorized to initiate the investment, but because it is material amount, it is appropriate to notify the Council of our intent to make the investment. At this point, not including bond proceeds, the City has in excess of $30 million in investable proceeds. Finance's plan is to invest $15 million into the pool. Conservatively, the amount of additional revenue gained by the City in 2014 will easily exceed $100 thousand. Our objective in bringing this to Council is to notify the Council of our plan since to invest these amounts in the pool. While the Finance director has authority to make investments on behalf of the City, this is a significant movement of dollars and accordingly, reviewing the plan with the Finance Committee seemed appropriate. The Finance Committee recommended an information presentation to the whole Council to see if there was support for this approach. Inbox City Clerk Mayor Finalize for Agenda Fonn Started By: Roger Neumaier Final Approval Date: 09/11/2013 Form Review Reviewed By Date Sandy Chase 09/11/2013 02:44 PM Dave Earling 09/11/2013 03:20 PM Sandy Chase 09/11/2013 05:14 PM Started On: 09/11/2013 01:54 PM Packet Page 131 of 895 AM-6110 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: 30 Minutes Submitted For: Mike De Lilla 10. Department: Engineering Committee: Parks, Planning, Public Works Finance Submitted By: Megan Luttrell Type: Information Information Subject Title Presentation of 2013 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update and proposed sewer utility rate increases. Recommendation Forward item to a Public hearing for the September 24, 2013 City Council meeting. Previous Council Action On June 11, 2013, the Planning, Parks and Public Works committee and the Finance committee reviewed this item and recommended it be presented to full Council. On July 16, 2013, full Council was presented the draft version of the Sewer Comp Plan. Narrative The City of Edmonds' (City) Comprehensive Sewer Plan (the Plan) reviews the City's current sewage capacities and looks at the impact of projected growth on the City's sewage collection, conveyance and treatment system. Per the Washington State Growth Management Act, the City's current Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan written in 2006 needs to be updated. The update will review and evaluate, the following elements of the City's Sanitary Sewer System: (1) Planning data and demand; (2) Sanitary Sewer System Analysis; (3) System Reliability; (4) Updates to the existing Sewer Model; (5) Regulatory Compliance with the Washington State Department of Ecology; (6) Operations and Maintenance Program; (7) Capital Facilities Plan; (8) Financial Program. An analysis of the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) will also be done evaluating the existing plant under current and anticipated loadings and also evaluate the future of the plant when subjected to tightening effluent limits expected to be imposed on Puget Sound dischargers. The Plan identifies future facilities required to accommodate both existing and future wastewater collection, conveyance and treatment needs as the City's population grows within the service area limits Packet Page 132 of 895 for the years 2019, 2033, and buildout conditions. The comprehensive plan will conform to the applicable sections of Chapter 173-240 Washington Administrative Code (WAC) and as further detailed in the Washington State Department of Ecology (WSDOE) document "Criteria for Sewage Works Design." In addition, the information from the 2010 City of Edmonds Inflow/Infiltration Study was incorporated. Table 9.2 identifies improvement projects along with a priority ranking based on flow capacity, video inspections, staff input, and maintenance record data. Staff will use this ranking in the future years to identify which improvements will be made each year to provide the City with the flexibility to coordinate sewer main projects with street or other projects that may be planned for the same area. There may also be times when the priority ranking for a replacement may change due to subsequent inspections or deterioration conditions that require replacement sooner than anticipated. The need for sewer main easements may also have an impact on when improvements are scheduled since acquiring easements can be difficult and time consuming when working with reluctant property owners. The Plan was reviewed by the Planning Board and a public hearing was held on June 26, 2013. The Planning Board recommended that it be forwarded to City Council for approval. Fiscal Impact: A financial analysis prepared by Financial Consulting Solutions (FCS) Group determined the future financial needs of the City's sewer system. Based on the financial analysis, FCS and City staff have determined that sewer system utility rate increases are necessary to implement the Plan and fund operations, maintenance, and the planned capital improvements. Factors that necessitate rate increases for the sewer system are: • Ongoing need to replace/repair aging City of Edmonds sewer mains and the need to increase the size of sewer mains, for sufficient flows in various locations as well as other capital improvements shown in the Plan; • Repairing or replacing existing pipes to decrease the amount of root intrusion in existing pipes so that blockages in the systems are mitigated; • Updates and repairs to the Wastewater Treatment Plant; • Mitigating groundwater Infiltration and Inflow from existing sewer pipes. Attachments Sewer Comp Plan Planning Board Minutes - Sewer Comp Plan 6/26/13 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Megan Luttrell 09/12/2013 11:41 AM Public Works Kody McConnell 09/12/2013 03:40 PM City Clerk Sandy Chase 09/12/2013 03:40 PM Mayor Dave Earling 09/12/2013 04:34 PM Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase 09/12/2013 04:57 PM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 09/11/2013 02:31 PM Final Approval Date: 09/12/2013 Packet Page 133 of 895 J IrJ-I ��IfIJ lillioiIJrl j rJrl August 2013 -7m] on CONSULTANTS Packet Page 134 of 895 City of Edmonds Comprehensive Sewer Plan August 2013 ■ S�L A N S 1601 5t" Ave Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 505-3400 Packet Page 135 of 895 City of Edmonds COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN August 2013 City Council Kristiana Johnson Strom Peterson Adrienne Fraley-Monillas Diane Buckshnis Joan Bloom Frank Yamamoto Lora Petso Public Works Director Phil Williams City Engineer Rob English Treatment Manager Sewer Supervisor Pamela Randolph Jim Waite This Document was prepared Under the direct supervision of Craig P. Chambers, P.E. BHC Consultants Project Manager Mike DeLilla 2013 Packet Page 136 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN City of Edmonds Comprehensive Sewer Plan I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 1.1 Introduction 1-1 1.2 Planning Data 1-1 1.3 Projected Wastewater Flows and Loads 1-2 1.4 Capital Improvement Projects 1-3 II. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose and Need for Plan 2-1 2.2 Ownership and Management 2-2 2.3 System History and Background 2-2 2.4 Service Area Characteristics 2-5 2.5 City Sewer Policies 2-5 III. LAND USE AND SERVICE AREA 3.1 Service Area Description 3-1 3.2 Surrounding Vicinity Characteristics 3-1 3.2.1 Topography 3-1 3.2.2 Geology 3-3 3.2.3 Water Resources 3-3 3.3 Land Use 3-7 3.3.1 Growth Management Act 3-7 3.4 Relationships with Adjacent Sewerage Agencies 3-9 3.4.1 City of Lynnwood 3-9 3.4.2 King County 3-12 3.4.3 City of Mountlake Terrace 3-14 3.4.4 Ronald Wastewater District 3-14 3.4.5 Olympic View Water and Wastewater District 3-14 IV. DESIGN CRITERIA 4.1 Performance and Design Criteria 4-1 4.1.1 Sewer Mainline 4-1 4.1.2 Manholes 4-2 4.1.3 Side Sewers 4-3 4.1.4 Pump Stations 4-3 4.1.5 Individual Grinder Pumps 4-3 4.2 Easements 4-4 4.3 Standard Details and General Notes 4-4 V. EXISTING FACILITIES Packet Page 137 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 5.1 Drainage Basins 5-1 5.1.1 Meter 1 Sub -basin 5-1 5.1.2 Zone 1 Sub -basin 5-4 5.1.3 Zone 2 Sub -basin 5-4 5.1.4 Meter A Sub -basin 5-4 5.1.5 Meter B Sub -basin 5-4 5.1.6 Meter C Sub -basin 5-4 5.1.7 Meter E Sub -basin 5-4 5.1.8 MLT Zone Sub -basin 5-5 5.1.9 Edmonds Zone Sub -basin 5-5 5.1.10 LS-1 Zone Sub -basin 5-5 5.1.11 Richmond Beach Sub -basin 5-5 5.1.12 Lynnwood Zone Sub -basin 5-5 5.2 City Collection and Conveyance Facilities 5-6 5.3 Lift Stations 5-6 5.4 Edmonds WWTP 5-9 5.4.1 General 5-9 5.4.2 Existing Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Loadings 5-10 5.5 Additional Regulatory Requirements 5-15 5.6 Infiltration and Inflow 5-15 5.6.1 Zone 1 Problem Area 5-15 5.6.2 LS-1 Zone 5-15 5.6.3 MLT Zone 5-15 VI. EXISTING AND FUTURE POPULATION AND FLOW PROJECTIONS 6.1 Population 6-1 6.1.1 General 6-1 6.1.2 Existing Residential, Commercial & Student Populations 6-1 6.1.3 Future Residential, Commercial & Student Populations 6-2 6.2 Flows 6-4 6.2.1 General 6-4 6.2.2 Recorded Flows 6-6 6.2.3 Estimated Future Flows 6-10 6.3 WWTP Flows 6-11 VII. MODEL CONSTRUCTION AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS 7.1 Model Software 7-1 7.2 Model Construction 7-1 7.2.1 Data Sources 7-1 7.2.2 Model Coverage 7-1 7.2.3 Modeling of Physical System Features 7-2 7.3 Loading 7-3 7.4 Hydrologic Modeling 7-4 7.5 Model Calibration 7-6 ,V Packet Page 138 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 7.6 Modeling Analysis and Results 7-8 7.7 Model Limitations 7-13 VIII. WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS 8.1 Introduction 8-1 8.2 Treatment Requirements 8-1 8.3 Treatment Performance 8-2 8.4 NPDES Permitted Capacity and Historical Loadings 8-3 8.5 Violations and Bypasses 8-5 8.6 Future Capacity Evaluation 8-5 8.7 Future Regulatory Issues for WWTP 8-13 8.7.1 Sewage Sludge Incineration —Air Emissions 8-13 8.7.2 Secondary Bypass 8-17 8.7.3 Total Nitrogen Discharge Limits 8-17 8.8 Plant Improvements and Additional Needs 8-18 8.8.1 Improvements since 2006 Comprehensive Plan 8-18 8.8.2 Additional Improvements 8-21 IX. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 9.1 Capital Improvement Projects Ranking 9-1 9.2 Capacity Limitations in Existing Lines Identification of Reoccurring 9-3 9.3 Basis for CIP Cost Estimates 9-7 9.4 Wastewater Reuse 9-10 9.4.1 Regulatory Requirements 9-10 9.4.2 Potential Uses and Demands 9-11 9.4.3 Reclaimed Water Treatment Facilities 9-12 9.4.4 Reclaimed Water Conveyance and Distribution 9-13 9.4.5 Economic Analysis of Reuse 9-13 X. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 10.1 City Management and Personnel 10-1 10.1.1 Organization 10-1 10.1.2 Certification and Training 10-1 10.2 Operations and Maintenance Activities and Programs 10-2 10.2.1 Collection System Maintenance 10-2 10.2.1.1 Lift Stations 10-2 10.2.1.2 Sanitary Sewers 10-2 10.2.2 WWTP Maintenance 10-3 10.3 Programs 10-3 10.3.1 Pretreatment Program 10-3 10.3.2 Water Reclamation and Reuse 10-5 10.3.3 Biosolids Recycling 10-5 10.3.4 Sewage Spill Response Plan 10-5 10.3.5 CMOM 10-5 Packet Page 139 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 10.3.6 Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan 10-6 10.4 Management System / Record Keeping 10-6 10.4.1 Collection System 10-6 10.4.2 NPDES Permit 10-6 10.5 Performance Indicators 10-7 10.5.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant 10-7 10.6 Condition Assessment 10-7 10.6.1 Collection System 10-7 10.6.2 Lift Stations 10-7 10.7 Sewer Division Staffing Needs 10-7 10.8 Recommended Operation and Maintenance Improvements 10-8 XI. WASTEWATER FINANCIAL PLAN 11.1 Introduction 11-1 11.2 Past Financial Performance 11-1 11.3 Capital Funding Resources 11-2 11.3.1 Government Programs 11-3 11.3.2 Public Debt 11-4 11.3.3 Cash Resources 11-5 11.3.4 Summary 11-6 11.4 Financial Plan 11-6 11.4.1 Financial Policies 11-7 11.4.2 Capital Funding Plan 11-8 11.4.3 Financial Forecast 11-10 11.4.4 Projected Financial Performance 11-10 11.5 Current and Projected Rates 11-13 11.6 Conclusion 11-15 LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES GLOSSARY ABBREVIATIONS APPENDICES A. I & I Study B. Model Calibration and Documentation C. Not Used D. SEPA Checklist and Determination of Significance E. Cost Estimates for CIP F. Known Collection System Deficiencies G. Sewer Service Agreements H. Pre -Treatment Policy 1. City's Development Guidelines and Standards for Developer Extensions V1 Packet Page 140 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN J. Agency review Comments and Responses K. NPDES Permit Vil Packet Page 141 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN LIST OF TABLES Page 2.1 Comprehensive Sewer Plan Requirements per WAC 173-240-050 2-1 2.2 Additional Sewer Plan Requirements per State and Local Regulations 2-1 5.1 Summary of Pipe Inventory 5-6 5.2 Pump Station Inventory 5-7 5.3 Current NPDES Effluent Limitations for Edmonds WWTP Discharge 5-9 5.4 Edmonds WWTP Historical Improvements and Capacity 5-10 6.1 Edmonds Existing Population 2010 6-2 6.2 Population and Growth Projections 6-5 6.3 Measured Flow by Meter 6-9 6.4 2019 Flow Projections 6-12 6.5 2033 Flow Projections 6-13 6.6 Build Out Flow Projections 6-14 6.7 WWTP Flow Projections - 2019 and 2033 6-15 7.1 Lift Station Modeling Data 7-3 7.2 Lynnwood Zone Lift Station Analysis 7-5 7.3 Calibration Result Summary 7-8 7.4 Peak Average Daily Flow for Capacity Analysis 7-9 7.5 Model Results Comparison for Build Out Conditions 7-12 7.6 Modeled Pipe Summary 7-12 8.1 Current and Future Loadings to WWTP 8-6 8.2 EPA Emission Limits for Fluidized Bed Incinerators 8-15 9.1 Point Assignments for Capital Improvement Projects 9-2 9.2 Ranking and Composite of Pipeline CIP - Without Granite O&M 9-4 9.3 Capital Improvement Projects 9-8 9.4 Potential Application Sites for Reclaimed Water 9-12 11.1 Historical Financial Performance (2008 - 2012) 11-1 11.2 Capital Improvement Program (2013 - 2019) 11-8 11.3 Annual capital Fund Cash Flow (2013 - 2019) 11-9 11.4 Summary of Revenue Requirements (2013 - 2019) 11-11 11.5 Projected Cash Balances (2013 - 2019) 11-11 11.6 Summary of Revenue Requirements (2013 - 2019) - Alternative Scenario 11-12 11.7 Projected Cash Balances (2013 - 2019) - Alternative Scenario 11-12 11.8 Existing Sewer Rates 11-13 11.9 Projected Sewer Rates (2014 - 2019) 11-13 11.10 Projected Sewer Rates (2014 - 2019) - Alternative Scenario 11-14 vi;i Packet Page 142 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN LIST OF FIGURES Page 2.1 Vicinity Map 2-3 3.1 Municipal Boundaries 3-2 3.2 Water Features 3-4 3.3 Soils Map 3-5 3.4 Water System Schematic 3-6 3.5 Land Use Map 3-8 3.6 Adjacent Sewer Agencies 3-10 3.7 Lynnwood Treatment Service Area 3-11 3.8 Richmond Beach Agreement Area 3-13 3.9 Mountlake Terrace Agreement Area 3-15 3.10 Ronald Wastewater District Agreement Area 3-16 5.1 Sub -Basin Map 5-2 5.2 Schematic Flow Diagram 5-3 5.3 Lift Station Service Areas 5-8 5.4 WWTP Layout 5-14 6.1 Diurnal Flow 6-8 6.2 Edmonds Wastewater Flows 6-10 7.1 Rainfall Hyetograph Used for Calibration 7-7 7.2 Calibrated Model Diurnal Pattern 7-9 7.3 Capacity Limited Pipes 7-11 8.1 Edmonds WWTP Effluent CBOD5/TSS Concentrations 8-2 8.2 Edmonds WWTP Effluent Mass CBOD5/TSS 8-3 8.3 Edmonds WWTP Influent Flows 8-4 8.4 Edmonds WWTP Influent Mass BOD5/TSS 8-5 9.1 Composite CIP 9-6 ,X Packet Page 143 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN GLOSSARY 100-year flood: The magnitude of a flood likely to occur, on average, once every 100 years. Average Wet Weather Flow: Wastewater flow during period when groundwater table is high and precipitation is at its peak, generally the four wet weather months, from November to February. Class 1 Stream: A perennial or intermittent stream that is used by threatened or endangered fish or larger numbers of other fish, or that is used as a direct source of water for domestic use. Force Main: Pressurized discharge pipe from a lift station. Infiltration: Groundwater entering the sewage collection system through defective joints, pipes, and improperly sealed manholes. Inflow: Sewage flows resulting from stormwater runoff entering the sewage collection system, typically through manhole covers, roof leaders, and area drains connected directly to sewer, cross connections from storm drains and catch basins, and direct flows into broken sewers. Maximum Monthly Flow: Average daily flow during the highest flow month of the year. Mini -Basin: Drainage catchment areas within the North Creek, Swamp Creek, Picnic Point, Everett or Little Bear Creek Drainage Basins. Mini -basins followed the King County delineation to the extent of the County's effort to define the mini -basins. National Flood Insurance Program: Federally funded program providing flood insurance to property owners in flood plains provided the local government meets certain criteria for management of flood damage risk. Orange Book: Criteria for Sewage Works Design, published by the Washington State Department of Ecology Peak Hourly Flow: Wastewater flow during the highest flow hour. Sensitive Area: Area in which development potential is limited by environmental factors such as steep slopes, wetlands, and valuable natural habitat. Sewer Lateral: A sewer with no other common sewers discharging into it. Sewer Submain: A sewer that receives flow from one or more lateral sewers. Sewer Main or Trunk: A sewer that receives flow from one or more submains. Sewer Interceptor: A sewer that receives flow from a number of main or trunk sewers, force mains, etc. Urban Growth Area: Area in which urban development must be contained, as stipulated by the Growth Management Act. X Packet Page 144 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN ABBREVIATIONS AAF Average Annual Flow ADWF Average Dry Weather Flow AWWD Alderwood Water and Wastewater District AWWF Average Wet Weather Flow BOD Biological Oxygen Demand CFR Code of Federal Regulations CIP Capital Improvement Program CWA Clean Water Act DOH Washington State Department of Health DOE Washington State Department of Ecology EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency ERU Equivalent Residential Unit ESA Endangered Species Act FEMA Federal Emergency Management Act FOG Fats, Oils and Greases FPS Feet per second FWPCA Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("The Clean Water Act") GMA Growth Management Act GPCD Gallons per capita per day GPAD Gallons per acre per day GPD Gallons per day HPA Hydraulic Project Approval 1/1 Infiltration and Inflow JARPA Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application KCDNR King County Department of Natural Resources MMF Maximum Month Flow MBR Membrane Bioreactor MGD Million Gallons per Day mg/I milligrams per liter NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System OCD Washington State Office of Community Development OFM Washington State Office of Financial Management ppd Pounds per day PVC Polyvinyl Chloride PWWF Peak Wet Weather Flow RCW Revised Code of Washington SEPA State Environmental Policy Act SRF State Revolving Fund TSS Total Suspended Solids UGA Urban Growth Area USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service WAC Washington Administrative Code WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant Xl Packet Page 145 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN CHAPTER I — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 INTRODUCTION The City of Edmonds' (City) Comprehensive Sewer Plan (the Plan) reviews the City's current sewage capacities and looks at the impact of projected growth on the City's sewage collection and conveyance system. The analysis of the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) was also done evaluating the existing plant under current and anticipated loadings and also evaluated the future of the plant when subjected to tightening effluent limits expected to be imposed on Puget Sound dischargers. The Plan identifies future facilities required to accommodate both existing and future wastewater collection, conveyance and treatment needs as the City's population grows within the service area limits for the years 2019, 2033, and buildout conditions. The plan was prepared in conformance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-240-050. 1.2 PLANNING DATA Population, employment and student population forecasts were used to estimate the current and future loadings to the City's system. Planning data from the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) provides population forecasts based on U.S. Census data as broken down by Forecast Analysis Zones (FAZ). The PSRC data tends to be widely used throughout the region and is the data base that was used in developing and analyzing the flows. After discussions with the City staff, the values were used for the baseline population and GIS delineation was used for the distribution of growth between the Sub -basins. Student populations were derived from the School District's forecast. The service area is divided between eleven (11) Sub -basins. These 11 Sub -basins were used to encompass the entire service area boundary. The twelfth Sub -basin flows to the Lynnwood WWTP. The definition of the population that has sewer service is complicated by the fact that some Edmonds customers are served to the City of Lynnwood. Conversely the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant serves non -Edmonds customers. The population values and the methodology are presented in Chapter 6. There are three segments that comprise the served population: residential, student and employment. These three sectors are generally thought to capture all the sources expected in the Edmonds Service Area. This approach works well in largely developed, Packet Page 146 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN non -industrial service areas. Similar approaches were used in the Alderwood Water and Wastewater District's Comprehensive Plan in 2010 and in the City of Lynnwood's Comprehensive Plan in 2012. With these values of existing and projected users, a population equivalent was developed recognizing that a student or an employee contributes a fraction of a permanent resident. This ratio was established to be 5 to 1 for students, meaning that 5 students is equivalent to a resident and 3 to 1 for employees (i.e. 3 employees is equivalent to a resident). This ratio is consistent with textbook values. 1.3 PROJECTED WASTEWATER FLOWS AND LOADS A capacity analysis of the existing City sewer network was undertaken using the XP- SWMM hydraulic modeling program. Existing lift stations and their firm capacities also were included in the model. The flow data from the City's flow meters were largely used in calibrating the model. The location of the flow meters was instrumental in delineating the Sub -basin boundaries. These Sub -basin areas were consistent with the basin boundaries used in the previous 1/1 study. The model was developed using information from the City's GIS electronic database, supplemented by selected as -built drawings, pump records, flow monitoring data, and with other available data such as ground elevation LIDAR information. Models were constructed to represent the network in 2010, 2019, 2033, and build out. The year 2010 was used for calibration purposes utilizing flow metering data at a eight locations in the collection system and three flow meters at the plant. Various flow conditions were evaluated for the flow data from each of the meters. Flow data from 2006 through 2012 was evaluated and summarized in Appendix B. Data for calibration purposes focused on flow from the years 2010 through 2012. • Average Dry Weather Flow was defined as the average daily flow for the months of July through October when no measureable rain was recorded. • Average Daily Flow was defined as the average flow over the entire year • Average Wet Weather Flow was defined as the average of the daily flows from the months of November through March • Maximum Month Flows are valuable particularly for the WWTP and are typically thought to be the design flow events for the plant. From the flow records, the maximum monthly average for the years 2010 through 2012 was selected. • Peak Day Flows are the measured maximum daily flows over the period of 2010 through 2012. • Peak Hour Flows used the measured peak day flows, applying a peak day to peak hour factor and by adding the diurnal flow variation to arrive at this estimated flow. 1-2 Packet Page 147 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN With the flows determined and the known population equivalence, a flow per population equivalence was determined. With the multiple flow meters and the extensive flow data that spanned several years, we saw consistent flow patterns in all the flow meter data. This historical flow data was used to project future and anticipated flows. There was an anomaly in the data measured in Meters 3 and the MLT meter at the WWTP. These two meters are downstream of the flow diversion to King County and consequently reflect lower total flows coming into the Edmonds system. This explains the low per population equivalent values seen at these two meters. The 1/1 component is captured in and part of the peak day and peak hour per population equivalent flow values. It is important to recognize that the 1/1 component is reflective of current conditions and that, as the pipes continue to age and degrade, the volume of 1/1 entering the system will continue to increase. An allowance for that continued degradation is incorporated into the per population equivalent values for 2019, 2033 and build out conditions. The Engineering and Planning Subcommittee of Metropolitan Water Pollution Abatement Advisory Committee (MWPAAC) has defined this degradation of sewers as a 7-percent per decade increase in 1/I. Though it might be acceptable to allow conditional surcharging of the conveyance lines, for the purposes of this analysis it has been conservatively estimated that no surcharging will be allowed. This effectively means that there is added and reserve capacity within the surcharging volumes. Where pipe sections were identified as requiring an upgrade, the proposed upgrade was sized to provide capacity equal to or greater than the estimated build out flows and to prevent any conditional surcharging from occurring. At lift stations where the estimated peak hour flows were shown to exceed the current firm capacity, a suitable build out upgrade flow capacity was estimated. This capacity was incorporated into the model for the planning horizon showing evidence of capacity limitation. This enabled the impact of the increased flow on the downstream sewer network to be investigated. The actual mechanical and electrical improvements to the lift stations would not likely be sized for the build out conditions. The results of the capacity analysis were used to develop the capital improvement program detailed in Chapter 9. 1.4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS The capital improvement projects (CIP) developed in Chapter 9 are presented by time period. It should be noted that this plan has neither proposed a routing to extend sewers to every lot within the service boundary, nor was it the intention of this plan to finance those line extensions. The CIP does not include the line extensions and pump stations needed to serve presently unsewered areas. These line extensions are 1-3 Packet Page 148 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN assumed to be initiated and financed by developers or through ULIDs. Consequently, no City financing mechanism is proposed for these lines. The CIP is limited to the following categories: • Existing lines that need to be upgraded/upsized to convey flows as population and flows increase • Existing lift stations that need to be upgraded to accommodate increasing flows. • Existing lift stations that need modifications or improvements. This might include equipment that has reached or are soon to reach their useful life, needed new features, and stations that are slated to be abandoned or rerouted. • Chronic maintenance areas that can be resolved with a capital project. • WWTP improvements to respond to increasing flows, loads or new regulations Cost estimates for each CIP was prepared based on current year (2013) pricing. Detailed cost estimates can be found in Appendix E. These projects were assigned a target period for completion based on the anticipated added flows and the expectation that capacity would be exceeded by the end of that period. Those improvements shown as 2013 to 2019 projects are those projects that have current or soon anticipated capacity issues and should be pursued first. Those that are in subsequent periods of 2019 to 2033 and 2033 to Build Out are projects that should be completed on or before that target year. Capital Improvements Projects to be financed through the Sewer Fund for those periods are presented in Table 9.3 and are summarized below: CIP financed from the Sewer Fund: 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 $7,752,814 $4,319,349 $3,000,000 $3,005,000 $2,975,000 $2,930,000 $2,975,000 1-4 Packet Page 149 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN CHAPTER II — INTRODUCTION 2.1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR PLAN This 2012 Comprehensive Sewer Plan is prepared for the City to fulfill the requirements of Chapter 173-240-050 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) and Chapter 90.48 of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). The WAC requirements are outlined in Table 2.1. Table 2.1 Comprehensive Sewer Plan Requirements per WAC 173-240-050 Reference Paragraph Description of Requirement Location in Document 3a Purpose and need for proposed plan Section 2.1 3b Who will own, operate, and maintain system Section 2.2 3c Existing and proposed service boundaries Figure 3.1 3d Layout map showing boundaries; existing sewer facilities; proposed sewers; topography and elevations; streams, lakes; and other water bodies; water systems Figures 3.2 3e Population trends Chapter 6 3f Existing domestic and/or industrial wastewater facilities within 20 miles Figure 2.1 3g Infiltration and inflow problems Section5.6 and Chapter 7 3h Treatment systems and adequacy of such treatment Chapters 5 and 8 3i Identify industrial wastewater sources Section 6.1.2 3k Discussion of collection alternatives Chapter 9 3k Discussion of treatment alternatives Chapter 8 3k Discussion of disposal alternatives Chapter 8 31 Define construction cost and O&M costs Chapter 9 and Appendix E 3m Compliance with management plan Section 10.3.6 3n SEPA compliance Appendix D In addition to the WAC requirements sited above, there are other recent state and local regulations that must be incorporated into the Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update. These additional requirements are outlined in Table 2.2. Table 2.2 Additional Sewer Plan Requirements per State and Local Regulations Description of Requirement Location in Document Evaluation of wastewater reuse per Substitute Section 9.4 Secondary Senate House Bill 1338 Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance Section 10.3.5 (CMOM). The Plan provides a comprehensive guide to assist the City with managing and operating the sewer system and coordinating expansions and upgrades to the 2-1 Packet Page 150 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN infrastructure for the next thirty years. The Plan serves as a guide for policy development and decision making for the City. It also provides other agencies and the public with information on the City's plans for sewer system extensions within the City's service area. This approach allows the City to provide high quality service to its customers and to continue protecting environmental quality. The Plan evaluates existing and future capacity of the sewer system based on current and anticipated future wastewater flow rates. Future wastewater flow rates are estimated from existing flow data and population growth projected within the sewer service area. An implementation plan is provided, including an estimated timeline for constructing selected projects. The financial analysis and the means by which the improvements were to be financed were addressed in Chapter 11. This chapter was prepared by FCS Group in close coordination with BHC and the City. 2.2 OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT The City owns and maintains a public wastewater system and is governed by a City Council. The City has agreements for sewage collection and treatment with some of the surrounding municipalities and special purpose districts for reciprocal sewage treatment. These agreements are further explained in Chapter 3. The City's wastewater system is under the general management of Mr. Jim Waite. The Sewer Division consists of 7.5 Full-time equivalent workers while the Treatment Plant employs 15 full time workers. The treatment plant is operated and managed under the general direction of Pamela Randolph. Additional Engineering and Administrative and Engineering employees are not accounted for in the above employment numbers. 2.3 SYSTEM HISTORY AND BACKGROUND The City of Edmonds is located in southwest portion of Snohomish County, immediately north of the King County — Snohomish County boundary, as shown on Figure 2.1, Vicinity Map. The City's service area extends outside of the municipality boundaries into Mountlake Terrace and Shoreline, to the East and to the South. The City also sends a portion of the sewage north to Lynnwood and ultimately to the Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant. The City encompasses approximately 8.9 square miles and but its service area is approximately 19.5 square miles. The area known as Esperance is an unincorporated area that is completely surrounded by the City of Edmonds. Edmonds was incorporated in 1890 but a sanitary sewer system was not developed until 1920. A primary sewage treatment plant was constructed in 1957. The treatment plant was further expanded to accommodate agreements sewage treatment for portions of Mountlake Terrace and Ronald Wastewater District in 1959. 2-2 Packet Page 151 of 895 ;h1;cCeylsl d11AS -c-(Ha,:; C, - r , '.,es Lupien F- Island Co Loupe -die NOLF s A, [I � woo, _ camano - Gaca�„ is - Pori Townsend VJhidb�� Island Lake �. ontirrA'sperA - �� ftr _. son Cc r• j , � ,so _ ` 99 , ,Getchel . —%CkarFa s _ °" ♦ Snohomish Co f m_�Lm � iii ,F -_=-- ,Mke Stevens � Rock - 2e Poe %' Jefferson Co � j' Mukilt�eo •Pon L : , 1 no ado S-r_,sr. GrVen F - _ !II Suhan^y.Startup - I.• - It 1 F-- ,r �•.M1ionr�e_, �_-;/-=•-r+---,- \�,Gok Bar ' - i Mountlake Ce , r Richmc Highlands m ,B hell - - Pou1i IMwnoa Shoreline Woodinville uvall r i i _ KltSap CO Kir and- / R mond 4 %,Silserdale� .�inbridge sPnc J* �� n `So marrijilt F kscvYon Eat.. _ __.___ _• 99 oadttlP ell , mmmnis : ; !' lanchester ;,mr- . •Port1acnard� Boein �a Kin NDn gg •ro♦ King CO F'�Fa. cs': • -V' go ,South ♦ 4ft•_ 167 F-_=-:q-m'e ` Bremerton No r;w if enton t aen- Se-r„c: Eulien TOlo:il. y '.a_hcn - Mason Co o = 8C - Hobart , D oine5 ( Maple.valley -i -. Kent - - f;''r',•�;'+-W�--!'Y <• �. _st - JA' � mon beach Covington ; H= 99 167 Aubu Legend rn I. F eral \ ay Auburn , Black D,3 Treatment Facilities 67 ; W E 20 mile Radius hurston Co 01- P� g ,M1leltor. - Miles City of Edmonds Boundary 16; � r � o z.s a 10 ,;� This map is a geographic representation based on information available. No warranty is made concerning ,�1 Or wMo the accuracy, currency, or completeness of data p' ids depicted on this map. VICINITY MAP - . BHC Consultants, LLC ��••-xr Figure 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN - Seattle, Washington 98101 911- 206.505.3406(fai ` City of Edmonds C N S U LTA N S www bhec nsultants.com 2.1 Inc. 1690 May 2012 COPYRIGHT 020128 C L N . Al VED COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN In 1967, another treatment plant expansion took place as a result of increased service areas within the City and additional flows from Olympic View Sewer and Water District. Secondary treatment was designed subsequent to a 1986 report by CWC/HDR and was operational by 1991. The City provides sanitary sewer service to customers within its sewer service area. Wastewater ultimately flows to one of three locations: • Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant, which is owned and operated by the City. • Brightwater Wastewater Treatment Plant, which is owned and operated by King County Metro. The City has an agreement with the County (see Appendix G) to send a portion of Edmonds sewage to the County for treatment via the Lake Ballinger Pump Station. In turn, the City receives and treats the sewage from the Richmond Beach Service Area. This agreement is describe further in Section 3.4.2. • Lynnwood Wastewater Treatment Plant, which is owned and operated by the City of Lynnwood. The City has an agreement with Lynnwood to send a portion of the Edmonds sewage to Lynnwood for treatment. Wastewater that affects the total flows through the City's collection and conveyance system can be categorized into three sources: • Direct service. Flow from customers within the boundaries of the City that is also treated at the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant. • Lynnwood service. Flow that originates within City of Edmonds corporate boundaries and is sent to Lynnwood for treatment. The City maintains the sewer infrastructure (pump stations and sewer mains) and compensates Lynnwood for treatment. • Tributary Service. Flow that originates from areas outside the City boundaries from other sewering agencies. These tributary areas include flow from City of Mountlake Terrace, Ronald Wastewater District, Olympic View Water and Wastewater District and small portions of the City of Lynnwood. Inter -local agreements between the City and the neighboring sewering agencies define the terms by which sewer service is provided. It is possible that those agreements could be amended in the future but it is unlikely that flows would be routed differently than currently described. It is assumed for the purposes of this Plan that the flows will continue under the current routing mode and that there would be no change to the current inter -local agreements that govern these sewer services. Consideration should be given to investigate rerouting options. A recommendation for this study is included in Chapter 9. 2-4 Packet Page 153 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Planning for future wastewater operations requires the City to address the land use decisions within the City sewer service boundary as determined by the City of Edmonds, the City of Shoreline and the City of Mountlake Terrace. 2.4 SERVICE AREA CHARACTERISTICS The City boundaries lie entirely within Snohomish County. However, the service area has portions that extend into the City of Shoreline (King County). The service area is generally built out and is characterized as a bedroom community largely comprising of single or multi -family residential units. The topography within the City ranges from flat and gently rolling to hilly with steep slopes along the stream corridors and those properties immediately adjacent to Puget Sound. Wetlands are found adjacent to the many creeks, small streams and lakes within the City service area (see Figure 3.2). Sewer service extensions presented in this report are planned only within the City's service area boundary. These boundaries are shown on Figure 3.1. Since the City is bounded by other sewering agencies on all sides, it is not anticipated that the service area boundaries would be expanded. Though not likely, it is possible that the City could re-route sewer infrastructure from the northern portion from Lynnwood WWTP back to Edmonds WWTP. Similarly, some flows within the City boundaries could be rerouted differently to avoid lines or pump stations that are shown to have capacity issues. The City could potentially also install a Lift Station upstream of Lake Ballinger Pump Station. While this would likely not increase flows to the WWTP it would eliminate the need for gravity main upsizing and would eliminate or reduce payments to King County for Lake Ballinger Operations and Maintenance. 2.5 CITY SEWER POLICIES Development of the City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan is currently guided by the Comprehensive Plans from the adjacent agencies. The City's policy for sewer service recognizes that its function is not to plan land uses for the service area but to respond to land uses planned by the land use planning agencies. The public sewer system in the City may be extended by one of two methods. One being a developer extension agreement, where a developer, property owner or a group of property owners request and construct a sewer under the terms and conditions of a developer extension agreement. The second method is a Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) process following RCW 35.43.040 and 35.43.042, where a group of property owners petition the City to extend sanitary sewers to their area and then are assessed for the sewer improvements. 2-5 Packet Page 154 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN It is the City's policy that the property owners desiring sewer service initiate a request for sanitary sewer service. After entering a Developer's Extension Agreement with the City, the proposed sewer design will be reviewed by the City to ensure compliance with the standards and design criteria. Sewer extensions shall follow the current version of the City of Edmonds "Standard Specifications Manual" and the "Developer Extensions Manual" as provided in the Developer's Extension Agreement. Once the improvements have been constructed and confirmed through the City inspection to meet established standards, then it shall be deeded to the City. The City Council has the authority to set policies, ordinances, and zoning. The City may find it necessary from time to time to reevaluate their policies based on Snohomish County and adjacent City land use, policies and ordinances. 2-6 Packet Page 155 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN CHAPTER III — LAND USE AND SERVICE AREA 3.1 SERVICE AREA DESCRIPTION The existing sewer service area for the City can be described as comprising four different service areas as summarized below: City of Edmonds. The City of Edmonds municipal boundaries comprise of 5,700 acres. Approximately 4,450 acres within the City of Edmonds is collected and treated at the Edmonds WWTP. The City both owns and maintains this portion of the system and is responsible for treatment. Approximately 1,250 acres on the northern boundary the City of Edmonds is collected and treated at the Lynnwood WWTP. The City owns and maintains this portion of the system and Lynnwood is paid on an ERU basis for the sewage treatment. Additionally, Olympic View Water and Sewer District maintains a sewer system within Edmonds City limits. All Olympic wastewater is collected and treated at the Edmonds WWTP. King County and City of Woodway. The City of Woodway is collected and conveyed to the Edmonds WWTP, together with the Richmond Beach Pump Station flow, via the Richmond Beach/Woodway sewer trunk. The sewers within this area are owned and maintained by Olympic View Water and Sewer District. The County operates the Richmond Beach Pump Station. An agreement was signed in 2000 for "reciprocal sewage treatment" with King County which is further explained in 3.4.2. City of Mountlake Terrace. The City of Mountlake Terrace lies directly east of the City of Edmonds. The sewage from Mountlake Terrace is collected and conveyed by the Lake Ballinger Pump Station, near SR 104 or N 205th St. The sewer lines are owned and maintained by Mountlake Terrace and the Lake Ballinger Pump Station is owned and operated by King County. Operations of the Lake Ballinger Pump Station are described further in 3.4.2. Ronald Wastewater District and City of Shoreline. The southern portion of the City's service area is located in the City of Shoreline. Shoreline does not own or maintain any sanitary sewer system components; these portions are either owned by King County or Ronald Wastewater District. 3.2 SURROUNDING VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS 3.2.1 Topography Figure 3.1 shows the City's service area boundary and the corporate boundaries of the cities described in Section 3.1. 3-1 Packet Page 156 of 895 Lake SerenQ'l � `N' 4 th = 1-5 r 40ih I,� a `PrOce 5 � � °' 40 42nd 41st �a'0je D Serene q3r 42nd �D �/ > 44Ih DD o DC D m �� (] a 461h 46Ih J DDu ULJIJD 48Ih � �� 47th ❑ 9Ih hgt 491h DD � D SOth yoI 99 52nd st ❑❑ Eon o 52nd _ _ � D y3td D 3rd L-ynnw ood� SSth LL D 54th .. 54th ` loi 54th 54th I \ II r !� 54th s4th lddS a S6Ih "' 0 6th f D56th yu �,�156th 56tt DDD��E 57th , o 57th o [s0th Oth 'r 60th DDD� 60th v D D 'Re fits7a 6zq d 62 d nd D 0.4ffi 62nd4t 64th�� DD N � f' rrJ 65th n Q `O 66[h ■i J� 5th r 6grh 661h O^ I` `'J 66th 66th�m 661 6.8 68th 6■■ 67Ih �DDDD d 68Ih � UUU ■ 69th 69m DD 70th ae\e _ D O §Iht LL 5'70Ih mDs D 9 D 1 Y I p� 73rd 74th ♦ ■ `7th • 8 ♦� dibo y�r 79th t — o o of 80th DD 81st D�� 61st Legend L� City of Edmonds Boundary Service Boundary Edmonds Lynnwood Mountlake Terrace Woodway Brier Shoreline Lake Forest Park Seattle Unincorporated Snohomish County mt D aDD 46th 48th D �uu 56ltthh DD 41at � D r �N 47th 48th 48th D o h � DO 49t SOIh D50In s7s �DDDD st DD 52nd 53rd O 53rd SI �54thnr [ F=1 55th =IV V �D DLak 60Ih N 59� 60Ih�D� V�� FI: 61 st D� 66th O RU �� I 68Ih 68th��., �` D _ IDD o Et��Elf ' C7 h! F' U ST Sy DO 3atn F44T 45TH 45TH 44TH OAF Lake Washington Brl- -r 39 � � 2ND 39T 4pTjy g Q HT Ze Ged= 36Ty�D O5a3rdPiO�e �(e O�D �D�5D]2nrd Ns34r6d th DvR4N`I/M Ufir I is �noA'=� �1SGT 32ND 23D35ZTHH 29SN ■,=ie Z6rjN VDrZ�23RTD D�5T 3TTH �0O�� 0U33D20TN �� D��33RD3R�NN� 30TH 0TH 4911 a 8THHiD 0 D27�T50th N N�26T2TH N 24TH 54th 0H 2C ^yam 22ND [ errace �occc 5 20 H P o o 1 �� z � �N DAD ,STH ,6THDD D� �a � � � �D o 6TH f a H=� 2TH 1T�012THD PE DD Lake Ballinger ��uuuu I .11 2ND 1 T_ _ C r n Z c �L� CORLI, r 0LIl,ri STONE Elntcleo Lpnke i1 n J IJ o N III AURORA 99 It 1/ ■'� s 86th 86�� t, h,�� 0 86th D� �_ _ `g6th �D h 86thr- o DD��IIILI�N DEN o 0 LJ LJ ttryDEN ° ■ LI Ni 88 Dth N SSth 871h 88th ■88th InolnJl LS 871h ■ ��❑=❑❑❑L1H �I E1 FREM ONT DD D Sunset 901h 89th �III��III II��J ttt.��_/// rJtJI nn '`.8 FIN . Q lst� m D �DD�DHillcresi OJa 90th " ■O ■ fl�l ■ D `� �❑ DL/ U��D� D�D DAYTON D L" ,J ` 92nd Sr _ D 121hD ■ 2� 92nd 92nd 92nd �' 9h 94th D93rd 12th� 93rd 93rd 93rd O P. N Q o Brtter Ln y, aDDO� D ' Ih < a 951h 94th F' 0 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST ALATINE la �� 11 th 3 ti 95th D� Olympic m D O N■ N 2ND 2ND 1ST D� 1ST DD� 96th N 95th . 2ND 0 O 2ND D - D 96th DD RDD��D D 3RD In 101h _ UJLW�mL`JTLIL1LLEdmar>k 9g 98th LJULJ N 97th 971h a �LJ LIDD� ��Uln�fn �V a3RD a` D�JD� III 2 `,D DD�L1�1� �LJW LII LJLJD 9th 7 1D�fLJLID DDDDDDN ■ 6 H 6'(0 m 6TH �O UO y 1 STH DE:Eu, 0P BOUND P� [D6DDTDTTTmT�Tl HTTrTWDDDD � Pao 1 0 61 �Imm�II ^mmI^II I^p^II OTH N 1 DuL 7th LWLtJ �LtJWU��I��DD L p2nd ❑loam ■ Do O 44 Z yip 1 11TH '�- \O \O 1 •• IIr�s, ^mI m IInIInII Mtn 7th 12TH i en ke SS 61 1 ar OLJ��W�W ��LIL16th n 1Ty� SJy 1 '� C Y ¢•�. �� 1 - c D` 106th D 105th D 14TH SPRI O q 13TH i 1 6 `Va��L¢�Dz D� 5t� O ■ 106th O F �F 14TH 3Ty �F 1 7 �108t ti 1 7th STH 15TH12'OZ ` 411111, 17TH �s ,� Q 0 x � Tjy 16TH �♦ , �O ��o�� ,♦ ,, .D,, �/�I�-qa�\Edm�on s �d eetkn `♦♦, Timb PugetSound �♦ Mak0D111110tthh z� lsr� DD��4,* „6Ih 24THoo ,17TIH I"^ di � Highland 0�� III"Ir ��' uincor grated �� Puget Sound 40 l� pF EDiypIV, 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 BHC Consultants, LLC GIS Data: City of Edmonds, Snohomish &King County base data. _ NORTH G -w- MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES Seattle, Washington 98101 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN actual conditions. This map is a geographic Figure 206.505.3400 representation based on information available. 0 1,600 3,200 6,400 CONSULTkNTS 206.505.3406 (fax) It does not represent survey data. No warranty Feet City of Edmonds www.bhcconsultants.com is made concerning the accuracy, currency, or completeness of data depicted on this map. Scale in Feet May 2012 3.1 COPYRIGHT©7jI12 QHC GQNSUELTFj Sh TA p„[LL y,l=RIGHTS RESERVED Inc 1890 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The topography of the City ranges from flat and gently rolling to hilly, with a few steep slopes along the stream corridors and property immediately adjacent to Puget Sound. Wetlands, lakes and many creeks and small streams are found throughout the City (see Figure 3.2). 3.2.2 Geology The retreat of glaciers at the end of the last ice age formed the rolling terrain characteristic of the City. Erosion and flooding of low lying areas during that period resulted in soil deposits of two primary classifications as identified by the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. These soil types are the Alderwood Series and the Everett Series, which are described below and displayed on Figure 3.3. The Alderwood Series is the most prevalent soil type in the City. The soil is moderately well drained and has a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. Permeability is moderately rapid in the upper horizons but very slow in the consolidated substratum. These moderately well drained acidic forested soils formed in loamy glacial till and occur on rolling till plains and moraines. The Everett Series forms the soils located on outwash plains, terraces, and fans and occur on slopes ranging from 0 to 65 percent. These soils are glacial outwash, characterized as somewhat excessively drained, gravelly, gently undulating soil underlain by sand and gravel and found on terraces. 3.2.3 Water Resources The City's municipal water system provides service to approximately 80 percent of the population within the City limits or more than 10,050 customer accounts. The other 20 percent of the City's population receive water service from the Olympic View Water & Sewer District, which is located within the southwest portion of the City limits. All water supplied to the City customers is currently purchased from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District and is conveyed through a single metered connection near the northeast corner of the water system. The City also has the capacity to serve a portion of its system with water purchased from Seattle Public Utilities (SPU), but currently maintains this source of supply and the single metered connection on standby. Water purchased from Alderwood Water and Wastewater District originates from the City of Everett Sultan River source. Water supplied by SPU originates from SPU's Tolt River source. Interties are also provided with the City of Lynnwood and Olympic View Water District (see Figure 3.4). 3-3 Packet Page 158 of 895 36ih 37m 38th = mf ry 361h / h� - t S`.�� `8t oh `^R 37ih N g Lake Serene I r� � � q 1 = 7. far 38 371h 38th Bri' r 390 / 1 40ih Pr° e s m 40ih 39th ` 39t 3 th 42ntl 4 �du ,r„9k 40ih Serene 43rtl • _ 42nd t 41st '- 44th 44ih _ ' 4Sr/i �� 45m `t c v 46th 46th 46ih 46th S - r 47[h 'P 47m N H m 461E 48thML d 48th �49th de 49th 50th ` ,°Oth B� 99 51atm 1st 50th 50th S7sr �,a Pies - 50th 52nd De onf 52nd ptLa/� £ st 51s p ♦ ,..53rd`` I L L nnwood i52"'nlll� �J 52nd 52nd m ` r�c-lN l"I •53rd 53rd rr3r ^ 53rd 53rd .. 53rd 53rd 55[. 54th _ _ 54th 111 54[h54th• 54t� 54ih 54th 54ih _ • 56th! If 0 56th « 56th Nq sr S6m ys ri r ake N56t 6 55th 55th _ ^r 57tn57n 1 57th l 57tn 1 r sq xarLa Mountlake Terrace 58ih 58th o ro _� 99 58th 59 i1 'u• °° \! I N - 58ih sptn not sam — 60th 60th '60ih 59th t 59ih 5th 7 G w 60th `� , 60th ' 60th 62n�! oa yap 62nd d ^ w 61st 61 st 615t 1st H 0ti 6 d y 63r 2ntl o RamP 64th $Ms� t 64yt S a H 63rd a" 64th 21 3 • • 64th �`v 4th \ kl f' = BSth v - r 661h ■% 5ih o a u`�i ® - �.a' 65th tiny o ., r SSrh 66th 66th r' m 66ih = c 66th��m N Eli .� 67tn 67tn -67th �` l� th U A y 10I ■ 's8m l�3R— sam satn 68th , 1 _ I m ■ ssm I ssm ;.ssm 6Brh m 70th a'W0\e -,%I ■ ac 9 70th 91h E a ^ r 70th w > ® I+\\ 70th t VaKealew 0e 17 �� mmol nd 7znd `\ Lake Ballii ■ ` 7zVV " 1st ■ �� 73r�� a r`n 72nd � �1 ■ ■ i7r?f �� - Mrd lrer c �t.G � � `7 I - �- 1 �' 3rtl 5 M 73rd r 73rd 73rd . 5� 14rh 74th = N 74th t� 74 r• • ■ ■ �5� w J th `V �h� N�■■� ��. Ism I N N 78thlsm-7=7atn ■ q 7e 7atywlV lam 7sth h 07 80th o 80th N ' : • 81st 81st 81 st 81st 80th V N moo■ _ 83rd 82nd n 82nd" 2nd ■ N 82nd �q� `• 83rd I ®82nd 82nd ■ N m —S` B rd 84th s 4ih � ro' m ■ F 85m 85m ■.l�n�ncorporateil t S6th 86th °i N N n 5 $ _ 86th 86th 87m 86th = 87th 87 `D 88 ev 88m 8t " 88th ■88th `� xIr Sunset 90th 89th ro I 7gr illcresto\\Jm 90th = y0m Om �, r1 - ` 2n °.-° 12th 92nd ® Sr 92nd 92nd 93rd _ NtBh 94m �� 12th 3rd 93rd 93rd M 2th ` Is a 94m, -h t 11th 5% 1 0o 95m 95th I Vie > / Olympic m _ ssm / c 97th I `I m a 2I ■ -Edmond ssm 2b 9th loot III • , r8th 8th 8th 10 o A Cary e7 0 6th 6th 6t� m 106 Legend ♦ 4r T S J `5thEEE 6EE lost ser 3°. I 41h 41 � City of Edmonds Boundary �� , 2nd znd � o City Boundary Makah E .'p Service Boundary `'.,, 9 \ Nootka O°9w° ♦� Wetlands �� ei I Highlind Woodway Water Bodies %4% ■ • * Water Courses `�� %CAMEMIEl ft IN MEN ST'M s Crek y0 w 44T t- yyon � 45TH J 4TH �F Lake Washington RA tE- BEAH J All Q� 8TH 39Ty 4p y C 1 37T 367H 7T 38jN 36TH _ - I � f• 37TH 36TH ory 35TH Lak Fore arc 35TH 35TH -O •32ND 33RD 34TH 33RD LAKE CITY 32ND 1ST �.,� = 32ND 31S 30TH 3otN 30TH /\ OTH 30TH 19m a 8TH 8TH 28TH 28TH ~ 2g'CN 281N = 27T 25TH 26TH 264N TH 26TH 26TH 2H 4T 23R ,s �G'. k2-1am D 2OTH P 22N v 5 0 20 O a a•(N = tx- 2OTH m 57t 19TN O �0 19TH N N H x 16'CN 17TH V 15TH 12TH 12TH 12TH 13TH • 14TH 12TH rx- 11TH 11TH 11TH 11TH 11TH 9 T I/ h 9TH I I 9TH 10TH Sly r f F 8TH N 6TH14 Cree STH STH kornton 4TH er I � 3RD 3RD 2ND 2ND 3RD x . o AT, 1ST 1ST 2 �i N ♦ n CORLISS x MERIDIAN BURKE BURKE o C � ENSMORE N V ASHWORTH w -\ �UzqIE+ I INTERLAK Z Echo La/c2 ,C Sh8'r line i STONE n O O 99 =URORA O� U N LINDEN ~o UNDEN a ^ LINDEN ) c� N �■ i FREMONT F ❑ -F x F ~ ro 2 DAYTON c 92ntl� x N r La F' X 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 2ND ALATINE 1ST �` v I� 1ST N■ N 2ND 2ND RD A 3RD In 2ND 3RD e �rn sa TH � 6TH POD Q� ♦ I � ■ 6TH ytN 8TH 9= n Q U OPT y BOUND P� I OTH • 11TH 10TH MOSS '0 TH •den O� Ih ■r SPRING,O 13TH 72rH th 1414TH 73TH 61F I Pth 5TH 9 15TH IN 7TH � vs � Prr!et Sound x 1 n _ 16T11 \ I 3 - Unincorpora�tei pF EDiyO . BHC Consultants, LLC Wetlands: Snohomish County, March 2004 GIS Data: City of Edmonds, Snohomish & King County base data. NORTH Gl� -�- WATER FEATURES - Seal Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 KingCounty, November 2004 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or - Seattle, Washington 98101 Wetland locations in the dataset are approximate. actual conditions. This map is a geographic COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Figure This dataset contains polygons that represent the representation based on information available. 0 1,600 3,200 6,400 206.505.3400 basic wetlands categories used r the King It does not represent survey data. No warranty Feet City of Edmonds C O N S U LTA N T S www.bhcconsultants.com (fax) County Stream and Wetlands Survey. is made concerning the accuracy, currency, www.bhcconsultants.com All wetland areas within this dataset should be or completeness of data depicted on this map. SCa/e In Feet May 2012 3.2 COPYRIGHT ©Wj g Cyi�IJSUELTq& LLp.,pJ 4IGHTS RESERVED surveyed before land use changes are made. Inc is90 1, �JOTC�J Ln'ie Serene ■ s \� ca 'r v° a � Det Pond 1 r ga(t � 41� Qgt ga � ■ ■�■ �� Qgt Qgt Legend • lga • City of Edmonds Boundary go Service Boundary ♦` Water Bodies Water Courses Soils C3Qa - alluvium C3Qc(w) - continental sedimentary deposits or rocks (Whidbey) C3Qcg - continental sedimentary deposits or rocks, conglomerate C3 Qf - artificial fill, including modified land C4Qga - advance continental glacial outwash, Fraser -age C3Qga(t) - advance continental glacial outwash, Fraser -age (transitional) C3Qgo - continental glacial outwash, Fraser -age C3Qgpc - continental glacial drift, pre -Fraser, and nonglacial deposits C3Qgt - continental glacial till, Fraser -age C3 Qgu - glacial drift, undivided Qls - mass -wasting deposits, mostly landslides Qgt Trr.rt�� Qgu Qg %, Qc� �, Qga(t) *4 SLefl Creel's `♦' �,`` Qc(w) 4;�, Qa Qga 1 1 Qa Lake Ballinger v� Qa creek 0^I McA�eer y♦ Qgo ' Qa Qga Qgo Lake Washington 1 -ho La 1 1 1 1 \W.-. ■. ■. r --,. /I\,--, �`� � Qc(w) � Qgt �— �.; f Qga' ) Puget Sound ■ Qgt Qgo -get 1 QI' �__ i 90 Qga" 00 Qf �� — �' Puget Sound r r■ ,�1�, Qga; I Qg ♦' I® I� Bitter G~� OF EDMoIVS . BHC Consultants, LLC Soils Data: Washington State Department GIS Data: City of Edmonds, Snohomish & King County base data. NORTH -w- SOILS MAP 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 of Natural Resources 2005 Seattle, Washington 98101 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN actual conditions. This map ia geographic Figure 206.505.3400 representation based on information available. 0 1,600 3,200 6,400 CONSULTANTS 206.505.3406 (fax) It does not represent survey data. No warranty Feet City of Edmonds www.bhcconsultants.com is made concerning the accuracy, currency, or completeness of data depicted on this ma Scale in Feet ■ P P� P� May 2012 COPYRIGHT©7jI12 gHC CyijNSUELTgI�TS,I=RIGHTS RESERVED Inc 1890 650 ALDERWOOD WATER & SEWER NORTH SOUTH 221 %Tit 21 tl!ff LY.T21 ZONE) 1 T 600 596 ZONE } I I CITY OF LYNNWOOD 573 ZONE PRV #2 PRV #5 550 PRV 010 PRV #14 PRV #15 & 13 PRV #9 -RV 09 TR V #16 PRV #17 500 500 ZONE I I 505 ZONE / OE=492.5' 0E=488' 1.5 MG RESERVOIR 450 -RV #18 DIAMETER: 80' LTTOM EL- 3.0 MG RESERVOIR 31.600 GAL/FT9 425 ZONE BOTTTTOMEEL: 1445' 420 ZONE 63.540 GAL/FT 400 T RV #3 T RV #6 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIRS & PUMP STATION / 'RV #7 350 325 ZONE 0E=325' 1.5 MG 1.5 MG OE=325' SEAVIEW RESERVOIR YOST RESERVOIR 300 PRESSURE RELIEF DIM: 1191x119'O. PRESSURE RELIEF g05924 DIM: 119'x119' STATION #4 GAL/FT STATION #19 1805,924 GAL/FT LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS 596 ZONE - PRESSURE REDUCING EL ELEVATION 505 ZONE STATION/VALVE FT FEET 500 ZONE MG MILLION GALLONS 486 ZONE H ISOLATION VALVE OE OVERFLOW ELEVATION 425 ZONE 14 CONTROL VALVE 420 ZONE y� 325 ZONE PRESSURE RELIEF STATION _----- ADJACENT SYSTEM O INTERTIE PUMP STATION Image Source:City of Edmonds �-' O FACILITIES AT SAME SITE Comprehensive Water System Plan, MSAAugust 2010 P:\Mapping\Maps_Generated\Edmonds\12-10265.00\maps\CompSewerPlan - March 2013\Fig 3.4 Water System Schematic 8.5x11.mxd 3/27/2013 ctolentino ra 650 SEATTLE PUBLIC UTILITIES STANDBY SUPPLY (592 ZONE) 600 4-------------- 550 ---------------------- OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT LOW ZONE (540 Fr) 500 450 1 400 1 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 350 WOODWAY ZONE (353 FT) 300 1 OV EDA"IV BHC Consultants, LLC WATER SYSTEM SCHEMATIC • 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 4 jw �Seattle,Washington98101 i COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Figure 206.505.3400 # CONSULTAN S 206.505.340s(fax) City of Edmonds www.bhcconsultants.conn March 2013 3.4 nr. 1890 COPYRIGHT ©2013 BFj§&f.7j11,%lIIL&4;&LI4CrgLl,4IWffp,4 RESERVED e COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Surface Water— The two most dominant fresh water features in the sewer service area are Lake Ballinger and Echo Lake. Lake Ballinger is by far the larger of the two and is located in the central western portion of the City, near 1-5 between the City of Edmonds and City of Mountlake Terrace. It has an intermittent inlet and drains through McAleer Creek to Lake Washington. The lake has a surface area of 100 acres, a mean depth of 15 feet, and a maximum depth of 25 feet. Echo Lake is located in Shoreline, a few blocks east of Highway 99. Echo Lake has an area of 12 acres and a watershed area of 288 acres. Puget Sound borders the City on the west. Groundwater — A study done in 1997 by the US Geological Survey found that 94% of the groundwater in South Snohomish County was considered soft to moderately hard. No appreciable widespread groundwater contamination was found at the time of the study. Concentrations of arsenic, iron and manganese were the most widespread groundwater problems in the area. The population growth in Snohomish County has increased dramatically in the last 10 years and has affected the quantity and the quality of groundwater. Most groundwater recharge in Snohomish County is from infiltration of precipitation, and impervious surfaces caused by increased development prevent infiltration. Consequently, less groundwater is becoming available as land development increases. 3.3 LAND USE 3.3.1 Growth Management Act The State of Washington adopted the Growth Management Act with the intent of concentrating most new development and population gains within urban areas of the more populous and rapidly growing counties. These counties are required to define an urban growth boundary within which urban services like sewers are provided, and any new parcels created outside that boundary must be low density with sufficient acreage to support onsite sewage disposal systems conforming to State Health regulations. The entire service area is within the GMA boundaries of the City or the adjacent cities for urban development. Consequently, the limitations on extending sewer service to unsewered areas is a non -issue. Zoning within the service area can be classified as commercial/industrial, low density multi -family, high density multi -family, single family, and undeveloped lands such as public right of ways, parks, and open space. These zoning areas are depicted in Figure 3.5. Low density multi -family zoning allows a variety of low -density, multi -family housing including townhouses, multi -family structures and attached or detached homes on small lots. 3-7 Packet Page 162 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 3.4 RELATIONSHIPS WITH ADJACENT SEWERAGE AGENCIES Neighboring agencies such as utility districts and municipalities provide sewer service adjacent to the City of Edmonds. Summaries of the agreements made between the City of Edmonds and the various agencies are described below, as well as background information on each of the adjacent service providers. Copies of the referenced interlocal agreements are included in Appendix G. • City of Lynnwood • King County Metro • City of Mountlake Terrace • Ronald Wastewater District • Olympic View Water and Wastewater District The geographical relationship between these agencies is represented on Figure 3.6. To better understand the current contractual agreements with the neighboring sewer utilities, refer to graphical presentations on Figures 3.7 to 3.10. 3.4.1 City of Lynnwood City of Lynnwood borders the northeast portion of the City of Edmonds. A portion of the flows within Edmonds municipal boundaries are routed to the Lynnwood Sanitary System and treated at the Lynnwood WWTP. This accounts for approximately 15% of the influent flow into the Lynnwood WWTP or about 300,000 gallons per day (Annual Average Flow). The City of Edmonds owns and maintains the sewer infrastructure in this area but pays Lynnwood on a per customer basis for the treatment. As of 2010, there is an approximate sewered population of 6,200, and an employment population of 509. There are no schools in this zone. See Figures 3.7 and for a map of the area. City of Edmonds also receives a small portion of flow from Lynnwood boundaries that flows through the Meter 1 Sub -basin (see Figure 5.1). This is estimated at approximately 0.5% of the total flow tributary to Edmonds WWTP. 3-9 Packet Page 164 of 895 Lnkt� Styrene ❑ 40th a 42nd S❑ 4❑ III 44th 64th 36th t ❑ `ac chD 381h � 40th 39th 41st ❑ s � �! 42nd t N 41 st ❑ ❑❑� 44th ❑❑❑ o ya2e/ j 46th ❑❑PaJPL�E]6th 46th 47th 48th N 48th 48th s ❑ ❑ �� 1❑ 99 49th ❑❑❑❑❑❑ 59th O al q" 52nd 51 st � ^❑I \❑�❑ L��,j U I 56th n J 581h th 58t ❑❑� 60th ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑r❑❑ 44T 45TH ST �y0 /�'w.'w.I i (� I� Lake Washington b 37th 36^ ❑A r�r.D D�IIStri, v�iI �n—�1\ 45TH 44TH �F` g N U th 42ND ��n��JJ to N �LJ Llh�❑ ��rtih Ut�l: Ity gp'CN a I� / BEACH 9th i/ A N aon �IStI`li('t ��Gnn rin❑❑ll ��❑ _ ,.. �--,,�,—� s7TH ,❑s❑-Jl��ln❑/❑❑❑��V Af/❑❑�❑.� ,l�r\ � G 54th 55th O 56th 25TH 12TH TH i ❑ UUUV'0 ❑�m❑� 66th 66th-1 E� U"fl'A6�h—" LAg�"LLJ❑❑t�668th o 68{h ��❑ ❑� In ❑/o �rH—.7/TH�I� TH O 7rH ❑❑❑ m 70th e _ 69L �O m 9th �❑❑ e p� e 70th t 7 th 701h %L 701h 2keN ' = 0 7 Lake Ballinger 32N ❑a71 st ❑ N❑ g 2ND O U 72nd � O LOB ❑ ❑ TM to ❑� �� 5❑ z I ( UE 73� _ a �. 0 73rd 73r 73rd _ �r D❑ r� 741h IJ N 74th 74th N a 74th 74th IIL� N CORLISS = _ ❑ N m m lgth 761h ❑ N Q A ❑❑��❑ ❑ MERIDIAN �� ` ❑❑��❑ m` GG Em ez� 7t `NiACh � rv' .�A � � BURKE ? BURKE 79th 'fie 78th Sth 78th 78th 78t `-' 78th 78th❑��❑❑�G00 °' �❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ o ❑ 0000 som BB See Ot . G� �❑❑❑❑❑❑ LD s alst aist s15t elst st s 01 �O U� � g d �82ndN 82nd 82d ❑� � ❑ 81s a��1111 �IIII'iI co«e❑ ❑��J�- ❑82n 2nd Lh7l =484th ❑�� ENE] � ❑ 85th 85th O O astn °' � ssm �, o ❑ � E t 86[h N B6th 8 ih �th o` / THL ❑❑= 87[hth w 88th 88th 88th � lll///JJ❑❑❑❑8t G�. 0 gunset 90th 891h /��I��i�rC�� ❑❑❑G❑❑�❑ c Q is/� 2n Ci,'•Iiy Otl Gdi�OC�.S'.Icres� Jm 90h s 9 t0 90th �v` ` ❑❑ 92nd 5 ep '� Q 92nd 92nd 92nd NtBh 94th D93rd 1 12th 3rd 93rd �I� LIB. rd O p. a OI m 1_c view = ❑ ?2SNT9 ❑GG 0 p 95th ❑ 95th / yi , ~ ti 1ST 1ST 1ST1ST m isVie Olym is ❑�Ic �� \ 'o `} „�I . rlPit� `n 2ND96th Sewer Dl�s.tdct o❑❑❑3R�� y ❑❑a��j�m��z1 97th 98th��I 9/th 97th ��N �`am� 6THl I T I If1li IR1TT P' F _ ❑ I ❑�❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ G I( III ❑_ inn 6T n �<N �❑f � �� Legend s City of Edmonds Olympic View Sewer District E City of Mountlake Terrace City of Lynnwood - AWWD Sewer District ° Highlands Sewer District 0 - Ronald Wastewater District City of Lake Forest Park - North Utility District _ E .1 Service Boundary o II^rnrn^IIII ^mmI^II IlIrrI yImnyITllIIlmI uu�JL JL�LJ ❑ :10THo❑o 7th ��ip2nd �dnpld7'1 //arQfT�TthTT[UTITW ^S��12T\ ( 'Ftil lelt L flsl Y KSe-werRl,Dstri❑6epF_ 106th N F 105th ❑U 3T 14TH /♦♦ S°'S ill �e T��'�JLJLJ❑� 5�� 108th❑ 106t7th STH v �<� 15TH �,�e ��❑� ❑ nd nd 110th O 17TH ,srH E o ¢ H Tmbe 11❑C� GG 20TH ,1� ,� `�aft Makah 3 ❑ 21 ST � � 21 ST � �' ootk y�ootl 11 I O� v D�a m 22ND ,, ♦ Qo TH IIILLLJJJIII B �� `� ,� a15 24TH ❑❑ ♦ ei Highland 38 i ❑l❑�� ♦♦��` ,��`� _ ram= Puget Sound Puget Sound ,A% , �#V L STONE C 99 O� tU�R OR7A� ❑ �EN � ■ GIS Data: City of Edmonds. ` OF EDAfC, ADJACENT SEWER - . BHC Consultants, LLC Snohomish County/King County base data. NORTH G 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 AGENCIES - Seattle, Washington 98101 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map is a geographic Figure —[&—.0011 206.505.3400 representation based on information available. 0 1,600 3,200 6,400 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 206 505 3406 (fax) It does not represent surveydata. No warrantyCity t Of Edmonds C O N S U LTA N T S www.bhcconsultants.com is made concerning the accuracy, currency, Feet y or completeness of data depicted on this map. Scale in Feet March 201 3 3.6 COPYRIGHT ©�3�H�ELTg�T$ LLp.,[q,l=RIGHTS RESERVED Inc 1890 0I0, COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 3.4.2 King County The Richmond Beach Sub -basin area, as shown in Figures 3.8 and 5.1, is maintained and operated by Ronald Wastewater District and King County. Flow from the Richmond Beach Pump Station is ALWAYS sent to the City of Edmonds and treated at the City of Edmonds WWTP. King County also operates the Lake Ballinger Pump Station which serves a portion from Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace and Ronald Wastewater District (Meter B Sub -basin). This area is also referred to as "Edmonds East" in the 2000 Agreement with King County. The Edmonds East catchment has a considerably more populated area than Richmond Beach and thus, produces higher flows. The City of Edmonds and King County executed an agreement on October 6, 2000 that addresses responsibilities for the flow. The responsibilities are described in brief below and the full agreement can be seen in Appendix G. Sewage Treatment Responsibilities — January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2012 The agreement recognizes an initial period, defined in the agreement as 2000 to 2012, where Edmonds was responsible for seasonal treatment from BOTH Richmond Beach and Lake Ballinger Pump Station. This was presumably done while King County increased treatment capacity within their system (i.e. build the Brightwater Wastewater Facilities). During this period, sewage from Richmond Beach ALWAYS was conveyed to and treated at the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant. All Lake Ballinger Flow was treated by Edmonds during the winter/spring months from November 1 until April 30. During the summer months, the flow swap was engaged and the County received a volumetric flow out of Lake Ballinger approximately equal to what the City is treating out of the Richmond Beach Sub -basin Area. There were limited periods that King County received all flows from Lake Ballinger, presumably when Edmonds needed to make repairs to their system. Edmonds was compensated $100,000 per year for this agreement. Sewage Treatment Responsibilities — January 1, 2012 to July 1, 2036 In a subsequent agreement for the period January 1, 2012 to July 1, 2036, King County is responsible for treating a volumetric flow from the Lake Ballinger Pump Station that is equal to the flow pumped into Edmonds from the Richmond Beach Sub -basin area for the ENTIRE year. The flow in excess of this volume is directed to and treated by the Edmonds WWTP. Edmonds is responsible for Operations and Maintenance costs of the Lake Ballinger Pump Station based on the amount of flow pumped into Edmonds system (See Appendix G). Theoretically, under the conditions of the flow swap, the flow from Richmond Beach Sub -basin should be within 5% of the flow sent to King County through the Ballinger Pump Station. Richmond Beach flow can be estimated by the influent parshall flume meter at the WWTP for Richmond Beach. The flow diverted out of Lake Ballinger can be estimated by subtracting the total flow into the Station (Meters A, B, D) from the downstream flow into the Edmonds system (Meter 3 minus Meter C). For the most part, in 2012, King County sent flow to Edmonds from the hours of 3 pm to 6 am. This 3-12 Packet Page 167 of 895 .7 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN indicates that they are matching the daily flow out of Richmond Beach in a 9 hour period, 6 am to 3 pm. In recent years and for the summer months it appears that the flow through Lake Ballinger Pump Station exceeds the flow through Richmond Beach Pump Station by approximately 1 MGD. 3.4.3 City of Mountlake Terrace The City of Mountlake Terrace is adjacent to the southeast border of the City of Edmonds. Mountlake Terrace lies east of SR 99 and Edmonds to the west. A portion of the City of Mountlake Terrace's sewer system is routed to the Lake Ballinger Pump Station (approximately 2,265 acres). The sewage is then either routed south to King County Facilities or north to the Edmonds WWTP per the City of Edmonds/King County Agreement for Reciprocal Sewage Treatment. Regardless of where the sewage is routed, City of Mountlake Terrace is contractually bound to the City of Edmonds for treatment of the sewage flow. See Figure 3.9 for a map of the described area. 3.4.4 Ronald Wastewater District Ronald Wastewater District is located within City of Shoreline municipal boundaries and is directly south of the City of Edmonds. A May 17t", 1988 agreement between City of Edmonds and Ronald Wastewater allows a portion of Ronald's flow to be conveyed to and treated at Edmonds WWTP. Ronald Wastewater District owns and maintains the sewer infrastructure in this area but pays Edmonds for treatment. Some of the flow from Ronald is directed through the Lake Ballinger Pump Station and may actually flow to King County per the Reciprocal Sewage Treatment Agreement. However, Ronald is still obligated to pay the City of Edmonds for all treatment costs. Figure 3.10 shows the portion of Ronald Wastewater District that flows north to Edmonds. 3.4.5 Olympic View Water and Wastewater District Olympic View Water and Wastewater District maintains and operates a sewage system within the City of Edmonds municipal boundaries. Generally, the District is responsible for an area at the southern side of the City boundaries. Olympic pays Edmonds for treatment on a flow basis. 3-14 Packet Page 169 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN CHAPTER IV — DESIGN CRITERIA 4.1 PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CRITERIA Sewer system design criteria and standards have been developed to maintain a consistent level of service throughout the City. These criteria and standards facilitate planning, design and construction of sewer system projects to achieve a predictable level of quality. These guidelines have been created to meet the increased need for sewer service in response to developments and population growth and the occasional updates to the land use regulations set forth by Cities or County. The following is a partial list of criteria which affect sizing and siting of facilities. The City's design and construction standards are presented in the City's Standard Details and supplemental specifications modifications. Plans and design shall meet the "Criteria for Sewage Works Design," prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology, as revised December 1998, except where more stringent City requirements are noted. These standards are to be followed unless otherwise approved by the City. 4.1.1 Sewer Mainline • All sewer main extensions shall be designed and constructed to provide gravity service for all adjacent lots. In rare occasions where gravity service is not feasible the City may allow the use of individual grinder pumps for a limited number of connections. The design use and ownership of grinder pumps shall be per Section 4.1.5. • Unless otherwise called for by the City, gravity sewers shall be constructed from PVC or concrete pipe. However, Ductile Iron or HDPE pipe materials may be required in certain applications. Pipe materials shall meet the following standards. Material Standard Plastic — PVC ASTM D3034-SDR 35 or F789 Concrete Class 2 unreinforced ASTM C14 or AASHTO M 86 Concrete (reinforced) ASTEM C76 or AASHTO M 170 Ductile Iron AWWA C151 HDPE ASTM D1248, Type III, Category 5, Class C, Grade P34 (See Section 2740 • Ductile iron pipe (Class 52 DIP) and pipe anchors shall be required for all pipeline slopes of twenty percent (20%) and/or greater. • Ductile iron pipe (Class 52 DIP) shall be required where the depth of cover is 15- feet or greater. Developers may request the use of PVC at depths greater than 4-1 Packet Page 172 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 15-feet. If so requested, the Developer shall certify the brand of pipe material to be used and he/she shall provide documentation that the pipe material is applicable to the soil conditions of the site and the proposed depth. • Ductile iron pipe (Class 52 DIP) may be required where the depth of cover in traffic areas is less than 4 feet. • All sewer pipes shall have 5- foot minimum cover in rights -of -ways and 3-foot minimum cover in all other areas. • All pipes 8-inch and larger shall terminate at a manhole. • Where a smaller diameter upstream pipe meets a larger diameter downstream pipe, the inverts at the manhole shall be determined by matching pipe crowns. • Pressure sewer mains shall be ductile iron pipe or PVC meeting AWWA C-900. • Minimum grade for 8-inch sewer mains shall be 0.5%, unless otherwise approved by the City's Engineer. Minimum grade for dead-end sewer mains that will not be extended shall be 0.75%, unless otherwise approved by the City's Engineer. Minimum grade and design criteria shall be in accordance with "Criteria for Sewage Works Design, State of Washington, DOE", unless City standards are more stringent. 4.1.2 Manholes • Manhole numbers shall be obtained from the City. • All sewer which are 8-inches and larger shall terminate in a manhole. All pipes entering/leaving a manhole shall be aligned with the center of the manhole unless otherwise authorized by the City. • Manholes shall be 48" I.D. precast concrete, designed in accordance with the City's Standards and Details. All Manholes shall conform to ASTM C-478. Manhole frames and covers shall be locking type in accordance with City's Standards and Details and shall be supplied with stainless steel allen head cap screws. Manholes shall be a minimum of 5 feet deep unless otherwise approved by the City. See Standard Details 1 through 8. • Inside drop manholes shall be 54" I.D (minimum) precast concrete and have a minimum drop structure of 5 feet. • Where a drop manhole is required, the inside drop shall be per Detail No. E6.5 unless otherwise authorized or specified by the City. 4-2 Packet Page 173 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN • Manholes with incoming or outgoing sewer lines 15" or greater shall be 60" I.D. or greater, as directed by the City. • Manholes shall have a minimum one -tenth of a foot (0.10 foot) drop at the center of the manhole. • Manhole channels shall be shaped to allow placement and use of the City's television inspection equipment. Channels shall be constructed at the full depth and diameter of mainline. Manhole shelves shall have slopes of inch per foot. Channels and shelf shall be constructed plaster smooth. • Manholes shall be placed at each grade and direction change. Distances between manholes shall not exceed 500 feet. 4.1.3 Side Sewers • Side sewers laterals shall be constructed of SDR-35 PVC pipe, a minimum of 6- inches in diameter, and in accordance with ASTM D-3034. Installation shall follow Detail E6.4. • The grade for 6-inch side sewer stubs shall be a minimum of two percent (2%). • Approximate stub locations shall be shown on the plans. • Cleanouts shall be used and placed over every side sewer at the property line. • A side sewer stub shall be provided for each parcel on all new sewer extensions, regardless of whether the homeowner connects or not. The side sewer stub shall extend a minimum of 5-feet onto the property. The side sewer stub shall be located and terminate in accordance with Detail E6.4. 4.1.4 Pump Stations Developers/Owners of developments that may require a pump station to provide sewer service shall contact the City regarding the design requirements of the station and the current City Pump Policies. 4.1.5 Individual Grinder Pumps The use of individual grinder pumps to serve residential connections shall be limited to connections in which a gravity alternative is not feasibly possible. The City shall make the determination as to which connections qualify for service by grinder pump. Grinder pumps shall meet the following standards. 4-3 Packet Page 174 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 1. Grinder pumps shall be owned and maintained by the property owner and shall only serve a single ERU. 2. Grinder pumps Systems shall be Zoeller 840 Series. 3. Minimum velocity for Grinder pump pipelines shall be 2.5 feet per second. 4. Pipelines shall be installed with cleanouts at the end of each line and at critical line size changes to facilitate cleaning. 5. Minimum storage volumes shall be 165 gallons. The Developer shall provided estimated flows to verify adequate storage capacity. 4.2 EASEMENTS Easements dedicated to the City of Edmonds shall be provided for the construction, maintenance and operation of sewer mains or any other related City owned facilities which lie outside of public street right-of-ways. Easement documents shall be drawn up from the City's standard forms and shall include drawings and legal descriptions for each easement. Drawings and legal descriptions shall be signed and stamped by a Professional Land Surveyor, currently registered in the State of Washington. Easements shall be a minimum of 15 feet in width, with the sewer located in the center of the easement. There shall be a separate easement provided for each lot that a sewer crosses. Easements must be approved and received by the City prior to side sewer connection. 4.3 STANDARD DETAILS AND GENERAL NOTES The City's Sample Plans, General Notes and Standard Details are provided in the Appendix I. The Sample Plans and Standard Details shall be considered during design and shall be followed during construction. At minimum a copy of the applicable manhole detail(s), the side sewer detail and the typical trench detail shall be included on all developer plans sets. Copies of additional individual details may also be required to be on the plans. 4-4 Packet Page 175 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN CHAPTER V - EXISTING FACILITIES 5.1 DRAINAGE BASINS The City's service area is divided into different Sub -basins as identified on Figure 5.1. The sub -basins were originally delineated as part of the 2010 1&1 Study by BHC Consultants, LLC. There are a total of 12 Sub -basins that either includes parts of the Edmonds corporate limits or areas that flow to and are treated by the Edmonds WWTP. Sub -basins In Edmonds Flow to Edmonds Flow to Lynnwood Flows to King City Limits WWTP WWTP County Meter 1 X X X Zone 1 X X X Zone 2 X X X X Meter A X X Meter B X X Meter C X Meter E X X MILT Zone X X Edmonds Zone X X LS #1 X X Richmond Beach Zone X Lynnwood Zone X X These Sub -basin boundaries are shown on Figures 5.1 and 5.2. Sub -basins LS-1, Edmonds Zone, Meter C and the MLT Zone generally flow west towards Edmonds WWTP and Puget Sound. The Richmond Beach Zone Sub -basin is conveyed directly to the Edmonds WWTP where it is separately metered. Meter 1, Zone 1, Zone 2, Meter A, Meter B and Meter E generally flow to the south end of Lake Ballinger and are either pumped into the Edmonds System or to King County Metro. The Lynnwood Zone Sub -basin includes portions of the City, but is pumped to the Lynnwood WWTP. A more detailed description of each basin is included below. The City operates ten different flow meters within the system. Sub -basin delineations are, for the most part, based on these meter locations. Relying on the flow data from these meters it is possible to identify flow in certain areas of the City. Similarly, per capita loadings and I&I contributions can be compared for each Sub -basin. This can be valuable information for identifying areas with high Inflow and Infiltration and for general information about the system. 5.1.1 Meter 1 Sub -basin The Meter 1 Zone consists of approximately 160 acres and is located on the eastern edge of City of Edmonds municipal boundary. 5-1 Packet Page 176 of 895 Lake Serene E" Sew 43rC� 64th 44th 7oth ��av OR— 1, 99 36th c a uO mt 361h N at° D Oath 259th O (-i 44th N tttlaa a 46th 47m ^^^^^^^ 47th ❑� 11h] 48th48th U 66th 66t w 66th "' 66th 67th `� 68th iLf 7otn t m m stn Er w � ,jai a 1st 73rd a O1 h 73rd 74t ■ lrJlC� O ILJI ■ fa FV e� ne 'th 79t B U SOth 88�88� 5 81s1 81st 81 st 81 s[ m 83rtl 82n �^ 83rtl 841h i 86m 6' Sstn m = N o e P 888thu RRth 67th 90th 2❑ 8k D r o 92nd 12t Nign 94m D93rd 12th 1t C �LS-1 „th N Olym is d n 10th 53rd � 53rd Meter A�� 64th M-o�antlake Terrace 56th 67th 67th ooDo�a� o� 63th 59th two �Inn��lr��nn 10171 Meter' 1 ' i ' ■ TKJa L L6' Znoe1� 1 U Ua f86)Ea' 7th ■ M LT,Zo ■ , �j � �Zyg,��j I�jC�U �I:1 1�_ V Ij-I WD LVIIIC I � U(_J � 1 T��WI7W1 WfYW1 LVJ LJLJ� 9th � 100t 8t UD th 8 W' �La^mmJ �Lrr°J �111JLJLJ��U�U� 102nd 7th LtJ W�� w ff�TT�1 ID�IYI1I Cary c7 m ¢,oh W ��uLl 6th �E-1 5 1061h y Legend E `SG 9e d 5th '. �'aar e�]E `�� g a Base Layers Sub -Basins Sub -Basins fWWTP 2n ♦ O nd ndv - r City of Edmonds Boundary Edmonds Zone MeterA Makah V City Boundary LS-1 Meter B ootk 9,N00 o , i 1 6 Service Boundary I 11 MILT Zone Meter C i�� S. `�' a Highland ■ Richmo Edmonds WWTP Zone 1 M Meter E `�,� ■ • �♦ Woodway Lynnwood WWTP Zone 2 Richmond Beach Zone � Puget Sound `�� ♦`a_____�� _ Meter 1 jI Lynnwood Zone C::�4�tefrME � NFE�ch. Y _ 12TH 1ST 11TH 1041h � 12TH 105th SPRI 1 1�6Ih 14TH I ...IIIIIIIIILLL F 7th STH 17TH 17TH U� 21 sT 21ST F �22ND o00 no 2ND k 34 99 X Lake Washington 7; 1 7 ��_ II ia.M, o y ' GPr' gODNDPQ- �O ' /y S\OH�P y�`e\p 1 Rich n �m 70 Z Puget Sound GIS Data: City of Edmonds. 1� of EDMo,V BHC Consultants, LLC Snohomish County/King County base data. _ NORTH G -,�-� SUB -BASINS 1601 - Seat Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98101 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or actual conditions. This map is a geographic COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Figure 206,505,3400 representation based on information available. 0 1,600 3,200 6,400 • CONSULTANT S 206.505.3406 (fax) It does not represent survey data. No warranty Feet City of Edmonds www.bhcconsultants.com is made concerning the accuracy, currency, or completeness of data depicted on this map. Scale in Feet April 2013 5.1 COPYRIGHT©7jI13 gHC Cyi�NSUELTgyJl=RIGHTS RESERVED Inc 1890 1, � FILE NAME (UP S:\CAD\EDMONDS\12-10265 COMP SWR PLAN XREFS: EDMONDS � EDMONDS ZONE L-3 ZONE E-6 EDMONDS ZONE E-2 2-10265 FLOW DIA.DWG ZONE 1 METER 1 ----------1 EI MONDS OVWD ZONE E-7 ZONE 0-1 EDMONDS ZONE E-21 ----� METER2 EDMONDS ZONE E-1 I I L T1 M-3 1 `-----00, ZONE 2 PLOT DATE & TIME ;) APR 17 2012 11: 32:. ML ' ZONE M-1 Ej MEW 14 METER D RONALD ZONE R-2 METER C OVWD ZONE O-2 EDMONDS RONALD ZONE E-9 ZONE R-1 METER B WOODWAY RICHMOND BEACH P.S. BALLINGER PUMP BALL APTS STATION ZONE B-1 RICHMOND f — — — , BEACH OVWD I INFLUENT ZONE 0-5 METER AT I WWTP ^---�� METER EDMONDS ZONE E-40 EDMONDS ZONE E 4 ----� OVWD --17�FMET — -- —_= 1--------^ EDMONDS ZONE 0-3 WOODWAY 11 PS #1 �EEDMONDS ZONE E-7AER 4 ZONE W-2 �� ZONE E-5 I EDMONDS ZONE E-42 I RONALD OVWD I ZONE F ZONE O 4 MLT ZONE MILT INFLUENT METER AT WwTP PS #7 WOODWAY II ZONE W-1 11 PS #8 EDMONDS II ZONE E-3 EDMONDS INFLUENT METER AT WwTP EDMONDS II ZONE E-51 II PS #3 (___t EDMONDS I LS-01 ZONE E-52 I ZONE EDMONDS ZONE BHC Consultants, LLC oV LDLj o Figure � • � 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 Schematic FLOW Diagram - Seattle, Washington 98101 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 206.505.3400 Edmonds, Washington 5.2 fa CONSULTANTS w0ww.bhcconnsultants.com April 2012 Packet Page 178 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Generally, flow from this Sub -basin flows south towards Lake Ballinger and can be measured by the readings at meter 1. 5.1.2 Zone 1 Sub -basin Zone 1 is comprised of approximately 324 acres and generally flows east to an outlet near SR 99. After it combines with flows from the Meter 1 Sub -basin, the flows are measured by meter 2. Therefore, Zone 1 Sub -basin flows can be measured by subtracting flow measured at meter 1 from meter 2. 5.1.3 Zone 2 Sub -basin Zone 2 Sub -basin has approximately 525 acres and flows south towards the Lake Ballinger Pump Station. Flow from this area is combined with Zone 1 Sub -basin and Meter 1 Sub -basin. This combined flow joins with flow from Meter E Sub -basin before it flows through Meter D, immediately before the Lake Ballinger Pump Station. The flow in Zone 2 Sub -basin can be measured by subtracting both meter 2 and meter E readings from the meter D readings. 5.1.4 Meter A Sub -basin Meter A Sub -basin is in Mountlake Terrace. Flow from this Sub -basin is directed toward the Lake Ballinger Pump Station. At that point the flow will either be pumped to the Edmonds system or to King County depending on the flow swap proportions. Meter A Sub -basin approximately 1,600 acres and all flow are measured at meter A. 5.1.5 Meter B Sub -basin Meter B Sub -basin is comprised of approximately 555 acres and lies outside of the Edmonds corporate boundaries. For the most part, flows from Meter B Sub -basin flow through the Lake Ballinger Pump Station and are measured by meter B. The Ballinger Commons Apartments are part of this Sub -basin but are not routed through meter B. 5.1.6 Meter C Sub -basin Meter C Sub -basin consists of approximately 143 acres and is largely located outside the corporate boundaries of Edmonds. Flows are combined with a small area in Olympic View Wastewater District and are measured through meter C. 5.1.7 Meter E Sub -basin Meter E Sub -basin is comprised of approximately 663 acres and is located on west edge of the City of Mountlake Terrace, adjacent to the City of Edmonds municipal boundary. Flow from this Sub -basin is measured by flow meter E. 5-4 Packet Page 179 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 5.1.8 MLT Zone Sub -basin The MLT Zone Sub -basin is comprised of approximately 1,575 acres. Sewage from this area generally flows northwest and to the City's WWTP. The MLT influent meter at the WWTP measures all flows exiting the MLT Zone Sub -basin plus upstream contributions. MLT Zone Sub -basin flows can be determined by subtracting meter 3 from the MLT influent meter. 5.1.9 Edmonds Zone Sub -basin The Edmonds Zone is comprised of approximately 1,415 acres and lies directly east of the Edmonds WWTP. Flow from the Edmonds Zone is measured through the Edmonds Influent Meter at the WWTP. Since the LS #01 is tributary, it is necessary to subtract out LS #01 flows to estimate the flows originating in the Edmonds Zone Sub -basin. 5.1.10 LS-1 Zone Sub -basin The LS-1 Zone Sub -basin lies at the north side of the Edmonds service area and is comprised of approximately 1,107 acres. There are three lift stations operating within this Sub -basin, stations 1, 2 and 3. All flows in this Sub -basin are pumped through Lift Station #1. This station, however, does not have a flow meter. 5.1.11 Richmond Beach Sub -basin The Richmond Beach Sub -basin lies in the southwest corner of the City of Edmonds service area. It is comprised of 4,054 acres. All flow from the Richmond Beach Sub - basin is pumped through the Richmond Beach Pump Station and flows through the Richmond Beach Influent Meter at the WWTP. King County operates and maintains the Richmond Beach Pump Station as part of the 2000 agreement for reciprocal sewage treatment. 5.1.12 Lynnwood Zone Sub -basin City of Edmonds has an agreement to send a portion of sewage within the Edmonds municipal boundary to Lynnwood WWTP for sewage treatment. This area is at the northeast corner of the Edmonds municipal boundary and is comprised of approximately 1,241 acres. Edmonds owns and operates six different lift stations within the Lynnwood Zone Sub -basin. Flow from this Sub -basin does not influence conveyance to and capacity at the Edmonds WWTP. 5-5 Packet Page 180 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 5.2 CITY COLLECTION AND CONVEYANCE FACILITIES The City's inventory of gravity sewer lines totals approximately 680,000 linear feet of pipes ranging from 6-inches to 36-inches in diameter. This accounts for the City owned pipe only and not adjacent sewer adjacencies which own and operate the sewer infrastructure, and send flow to Edmonds for treatment. Table 5.1 below presents the summarized inventory of the City -owned piping systems. Table 5.1 Summary of Pipe Inventory Pipe Size Total Length of City -owned Pipe feet 6-inch 19,678 8-inch 535,672 10-inch 34,145 12-inch 13,017 15-inch 9,612 18-inch 7,133 24-inch 21,937 30-inch 3,456 36-inch 3,237 Unknown 31,340 TOTAL 679,227 feet 5.3 LIFT STATIONS The City has a total of 14 active lift stations. Additionally, there are the Lake Ballinger Pump Station and the Richmond Beach Pump Station which are owned and maintained by King County. Several lift stations were upgraded in 2012. In addition, telemetry upgrades have been made at all of the lift stations. Most of the stations have alarm notifications which include: pump on/off; pump failure; power failure; high / low wet well level; generator run; operator in trouble; intrusion; and smoke detector. Table 5.2 summarizes the Pump Station inventory as well as some of the operating conditions. Figure 5.3 illustrates the relationship between each of the District's lift stations and give a representation of their location within the system. 5-6 Packet Page 181 of 895 Table 5.2 Pump Station Inventory Pump Station No. Pump Type Number of Pumps Pump Manufacturer Rated Capacity GPM @ TDH Force Main Size and Type PS Upgrades Year (if any) 1 Wet Well / Dry Well 2 1425 gpm @ 19 feet 10-inch AC & 12-inch DI 2002 2 Submersible 2 Hydromatic HPGFHX300 85 gpm @ 35 feet 3-inch DI 2011 3 Wet Well / Dry Well 2 4" Allis Chalmers 114 @ 94 feet 4-inch DI 2012 4 Wet Well / Dry Well 2 4" PACO 308 gpm @ 164 feet 6-inch DI 2012 5 Submersible 2 Hydromatic HPGX200CD 37 gpm @ 48 feet 2-inch HDPE 2012 6 Wet Well / Dry Well 2 4" Gormann Rupp 335 gpm @ 45 feet 6-inch DI 2005 7 Wet Well / Dry Well 2 6" Gormann Rupp 210 gpm @ 22 feet 4-inch PVC 2008 8 Wet Well / Dry Well 2 4" PACO 137 gpm @ 22 feet 4-inch DI 2008 9 Wet Well / Dry Well 2 2 - 4" WEMCO 2 - 5 W EMCO 332 gpm @ 38 feet 6-inch DI 2012 10 Wet Well / Dry Well 2 Hydromatic HPGFX 114 gpm @ 49 feet 4-inch DI 2012 11 Submersible 2 4" Gormann Rupp 95 gpm @ 73 feet 2-inch HDPE 2012 12 Wet Well / Dry Well 2 6" KSB 308 gpm @ 142 feet 6-inch DI 2012 14 Submersible 2 Hydromatic HPGX200CD 37 gpm @ 33 feet 2-inch HDPE 2012 15 Submersible 2 Hydromatic HPGHX500 42 gpm @ 60 feet 2-inch HDPE 2012 Packet Page 182 of 895 66th 55[h ■- "J �� =0�� N S w„JuV - '2 N N �9 r ssrh ssm s sstn sst s ssm o sstn 0 0 O�- o ■'1Q� 67th a Dlrl- Y68th �y _ H[]-t 99 / n o � � O Uus8tn DO�9s a sa LS #11u V 69th Gem ssm ♦ 69m 69th 6 s`9GS m lue Rid9° _ m 9th 70m ^ � ■ F69th71a70ih 72nd UL Z 72nd 72 ° a 71st - ■ 72nd •, � ♦♦ 0 2nd a5 ■ 74t 73rtl fO gJ` 3rd 73rd r' 1 ■ �%2� w 12°a 75t 73rd 73rd FT N ❑ 73rd1 73rd ■ �■ ` ��♦ ♦� � a qH° h°wtam ♦A � L 7atn �iA!• �� ■� 0#12 Tom 74t 0raemar u 74ih a ■ ■ ■ ■ [tttttt� ■ N E i L ° M r ! mt _ °� I `•♦ y� O'Oo�WWTP ■ �■■�� ■�°' � ��❑n � � � 7th 7th L N �' 77th ` \■ 78th 78t �] 78th 78th 78th ■ ■ ■ ..I F 79th O78th *N 78th v sul to s HBMBg� Ism t_ `� 0 �J h h ° no LS #14 �� oaooO �B�❑� ■ soth N1 ■ 0 17 ♦ -6��m�N a0t 4S-#9 a9m 81st slst 80th 1st gO a o th 81 st e m 2n 81 st 81? _ 82nd H 81 st 82nd 'YI 81s Btst �a � 82nd ♦ FIEl� 83rd 82nd 82nd ■ 82nd t \#4 O O _83r 3rd 83rd 83rd 82nd nd ■ 82nd 82nd?nd N B 4"t c� `m n 83rd d` • Bath s d m 84tn �� I _ ■ N s Q 99 5th 85th 85m SSm J 9� • 861h m j ' S6ih 85ih ■ 6ih 6m S6Ih 86th d Stith Summi .. tit = a ■ a 86th Stith S6ih ro ■ Stith 87th 86th N ` 87Ih N S7 ■ 7th ♦ 88th 88th '� 11 Bh Nth I go 88th 88th N ■ ` .. n oN e LS 1"0 Sunset h astn 89m asfs t3 to L sstn •�` fll 97sr 91st Maplewood o- Hillcrest o ,� 90th ■ O 90th �■�■y v ♦ afire 92nd rm 3 �■ 1st 91 st a 91s■ 92nd aiQ ■ 492nd 92nd `■� "°A ■ ■2nd 92nd ' rs 92n ' 93r 12th o hla % 93rd 93rd ■ 93r 93rd `.' 94th 9b� 1 th 0 12th 12t 40 ■ 94th 94m = 11th Q 95th 95th 95th ew 94thN &y� ♦ OIy. is Vi> _ lS s v DI`Lpic 95m ■ ♦ ~'♦ ` ♦ , �� m �a' �`v}r\ �� N nn�pnn97th s9ih 961h r 97t haIQ I�-7�hLt Oth []� 9ah Puget Sound 9thAUTO 00th � 2vN TT F. rh 101st vh nt101st 101o oTQ �7na #3 III7n T]I=�7 F ttn a to2nd loznd ' v '♦ , M ■ #2 ��u ma Hood 10504 1th 6 UP��6��m F" �106ih W t ■ oa r V N v 106ih N■ �hLJLJ ��LJUL'nJ� r` Humber t 7th ■ 07ih ♦. . , ° Eilmon.ds� DD/ u W w - o` Wootlwav GreYsrone <\�:�f� n� °pa s _ L # P LS #5 22nd ■nd a e ` a 119m Q oIo m E � 111ih ro � Legend Makah 112th ��'�� ° LS #�1 a �` ♦ food 0 0 Edmonds WWTP City of Edmonds Boundary Lift Station #1 � Lift Station #6 � Lift Station #11 ♦ % o,of Nootka Oo9 � o c o° 0 115th = �O Lynnwood WWTP Service Boundary Lift Station #2 Lift Station #7 Lift Station #12 �� , % qa�l 116th 0 Lift Station Lift Station #3 ' Lift Station #8 Lift Station #14 ----� Force Main Lift Station #4 ' Lift Station #9 Lift Station #15 •` �, ! �^�� N a� 41* ■ , ` Rr°hmond Beac - Lift Station #5 Lift Station #10 `�� `�� ♦� 1 OF EDA10 Sewer Zones: City of Edmonds, December 2011 BHC Consultants, LLC GIS Data: City of Edmonds, Snohomish County & King County. _ NORTH -w- LIFT STATION SERVICE AREAS 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 - Seattle, Washington 98101 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Figure actual conditions. This map is a geographic 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 206.505.3400 representation based on information available. S 206 505 3406 (fax) It does not represent survey data. No warranty Feet City ty of Edmonds CONSULTANTMMO■ www.bhcconsultants.com is made concerning the accuracy, currency, Scale in Feet March 2013 COPYRIGHTO Wg gHC CyijNSUELTgI�T4 u-PA4IGHTS RESERVED or completeness of data depicted on this map. Inc is90 1, COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 5.4 EDMONDS WWTP 5.4.1 General The Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) provides wastewater treatment service for residential, commercial, and industrial customers for the City of Edmonds sewer service boundary. The facility was initially built in 1957 and has undergone several modifications, updates and expansions. In 1991 the Edmonds WWTP was upgraded from a primary plant to secondary plant. Currently the plant is rated to treat 11.8 mgd maximum month flow. The plant is located at 200 2nd Ave South, Edmonds, WA, 98020. The Washington State Department of Ecology regulates discharges to waters of the state through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit system. NPDES permits are developed based on federal and state water quality standards and treatment requirements. The existing system is permitted under the NPDES discharge permit number WA- 002405-8 (modified May 9, 2012). Effluent limitations are summarized in Table 5.3. The plant has been continuously compliant with these standards. Table 5.3 Current NPDES Effluent Limitations for Edmonds WWTP Discharge Average Monthly Average Weekly Maximum Parameter Limits' Limits' Daily Limits' Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen 25 mg/L, 2460 Ibs/day 40 mg/L, 3936 Ibs/day N/A Demand (5 day BOD) 85% removal of influent CBOD5 Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 30 mg/L, 2952 Ibs/day 45 mg/L, 4430 Ibs/day N/A 85% removal of influent TSS Fecal Coliform Bacteria 200/100 mL 400/100 mL N/A pH Daily minimum >_ 6.0 and daily maximum of <_ 9.0 N/A Total Residual Chlorine 191 µg/L I N/A 442 µg/L Current load limits are based on the Maximum Month Design Flow MMDF of 11.80 m d. Biosolids (sludge) treatment and use are regulated under federal (40 CFR Part 503) and State (Chapter 173-308 WAC) regulations through the Statewide General Permit for Biosolids Management. Sludge from the Edmonds plant is dewatered using a belt filter press and incinerated using an on -site fluidized bed incinerator. The plant has been compliant with the regulations for sewage sludge incinerators based on air emission limits established in Title 40 Part 503 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The air emissions standards have recently been expanded by the EPA. On February 21, 2011, the EPA published their newest final SSI emission regulations in the Federal Register at Title 40 Part 60, under the provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 129 "Solid Waste Incineration Units". The new regulations were declared to be effective on May 20, 2011. 5-9 Packet Page 184 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The previous and new air quality emission limits, how the plant's current emissions compare with the new standards and how the new regulations will affect the current incinerator equipment, operations and costs are discussed in Section 8.7.1. 5.4.2 Existing Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Loadings The plant was originally constructed in 1957 and has been modified or upgraded several times since then. Table 5.4 summarizes the history of the WWTP. Though the historical perspective of the improvements and modifications to the plant is interesting, the current infrastructure is really the important issue. The following sections describe the current facilities. General: The current plant has a design maximum month flow of 11.8 mgd. The maximum month flow the plant currently treats is about 9.5 mgd. Flow is measured by three Parshall flume meters on the influent side of the WWTP and by an effluent meter. Table 5.4 Edmonds WWTP Historical Improvements and Capacity Design Capacity Maximum Average Peak Project description Date Month Annual Hour (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) Original Construction Grit removal, sewage grinding, primary settling, 1957 2 digestion, chlorination and outfall. Improvements and Modifications Capacity Expansion 1959 4 Two additional clarifiers, effluent pumping, sludge dewatering and incineration system. 1967 7.6 Removed grit and digestion. Secondary Treatment 1991 11.8 9.1 40 Headworks The headworks consists of three channels designated for measuring Edmonds, Mountlake Terrace, and Richmond Beach basin flows. Before the flow is measured with parshall flumes, three 4-foot wide mechanical bar screens with '/4-inch openings screens the influent. The flow then enters a wet well where four 100 hp vertical non -clog raw sewage pumps, each with a capacity of 9,260 gpm, the process flow though two 24" pipes to a primary influent splitter box. The splitter box gravity feeds the flow to the primary clarifiers. 5-10 Packet Page 185 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Primary Clarifiers Edmonds has three primary clarifiers. Two of the clarifiers are center fed square tanks 60 feet by 60 feet with a surface area of 3,600 square feet each. The third clarifier is rectangular, 91 feet long by 45 feet wide for a surface area of 4,095 square feet. The total surface area of the three primary clarifiers is 11,295 square feet. The primary clarifiers provide quiescent conditions that reduces the flows velocity to the point that solids can be settled and removed. The clarifier also allows floatable material like plastics, oil, grease and scum to be skimmed off the surface and removed. Typically primary clarifier removals of the plant influent are 50 to 70 percent of suspended solids and 25 to 40 percent of BOD5. The primary sizing design criteria for clarifiers is the surface overflow rate, or the flow rate divided by the clarifier surface area; this is known as the vertical flow velocity. Typical design values for peak hourly flows are in the range of 2,000 to 3,000 gallons per day per square foot (gpd/sf). At 3,000 gpd/sf, the existing primary clarifiers would have a maximum performance -based capacity of 11,295 sf x 3,000 gpd/sf = 33.885 mgd. Aeration Basins After leaving the primary clarifiers, the liquid stream enters a channel that can flow to one of the three aeration basins. The three aeration basins are each 75.3 feet wide by 58 feet long and 20.6 feet deep with a total volume of approximately 673,000 gallons each (2.0 million gallons total). The aeration basins provide biological treatment by increasing the dissolved oxygen in the basin with fine bubble diffusers that disperse forced air. The oxygenated water encourages the growth of bacteria and microorganisms which consumes the waste flow's organic solids. When the process flow enters the aeration basins it first goes through a premix box where return activated sludge (RAS) from the secondary clarifiers mixes with the influent. The return sludge is the settled solids from the clarifiers and they are returned to increase the mixed liquor concentration and solids retention time (SRT) in the aeration basins. Secondary Clarifiers The secondary clarifiers are necessary for separating treated effluent from the mixed liquor solids leaving the aeration basins. The three circular clarifiers are 90 feet in diameter with a 17.5 foot side water depth which provide quiescent conditions for gravity sludge settling to occur. The mixed liquor from the aeration basin is fed into the center of the clarifier and flows outward to the effluent launders. The projected annual average surface overflow rate, in year 2033 is 306 gpd/sf and is far less than the average performance design of 550 gpd/sf. The settled solids from the bottom of the clarifiers are the source for return sludge recycled back to the aeration basins. Secondary sludge pumps return the activated sludge from the clarifiers back to the to the individual premix boxes at each aeration basin. The waste activated sludge is wasted to a storage tank and then pumped to the belt presses for dewatering before incineration. 5-11 Packet Page 186 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Chlorine Disinfection The plant effluent is disinfected using liquid sodium hypochlorite (bleach). The sodium hypochlorite disinfection flash mix structure is provided to recombine effluent from the secondary clarifiers, however, current operation is to feed sodium hypochlorite at the secondary clarifier weir overflows which increases the contact time. The structure also provides 12.5% concentration sodium hypochlorite solution injection to the secondary effluent. Sodium hypochlorite is bought in bulk and stored at the facility in two 3,000 gallon tanks. The purpose of the chlorine contact chamber is to provide a minimum of 20 minutes of detention time at peak hour flow rates, prior to discharge of the secondary effluent to the outfall, in order to allow the sodium hypochlorite solution time to react with the effluent. The current peak hour contact time using only the chlorine contact chamber is 14 minutes and is projected to be about the same in the year 2033. The practice of feeding sodium hypochlorite at the secondary weir overflow will continue. The plant is meeting the current disinfection criteria by increasing the chlorination dose and then dechlorinating. The plant is able to control the chlorine residual through dechlorination by using bisulfate. The bisulfate is a 38% NaHS03 solution that when added to water releases sulfur dioxide which reacts with free chlorine and chloramines reducing effluent concentrations. Sludge Dewatering Primary and WAS is combined before dewatering and averages about 1.0% total solids. The dewatering equipment consists of two belt presses where one operates at a time from 12 to 24 hours a day depending on the Edmonds Plant sludge production. The dewatered sludge is fed to the onsite fluidized bed incinerator. Incineration From the belt presses, the dewatered sludge cake is deposited by a belt conveyor into a hopper that delivers the dewatered sludge to the fluid bed incinerator by a hydraulic pump. The fats, oils, and greases (FOG) are collected in the Primary Sludge Tank and are mixed with raw and WAS as feed to the belt presses. Large influxes of FOG are not desirable for incineration because their high fuel value makes temperature control more difficult. Internally the incinerator has a reactor bed of sand that is fluidized by a controlled, pre- heated air supply that is blown through it. Here the dewatered sludge cake is fed into the fluidized sand bed where it is burned. In this bed the dewatered sludge is broken up by the sands fluidizing motion and is incinerated by the heat. Diesel fuel is pumped into the reactor to aid in combustion, as required. The amount of supplemental fuel required depends on the heat content of the combustion air (which is pre -heated by the primary flue gas heat exchanger), and the heat content of the sludge, which is dependent on the solids content of the dewatered sludge (% volatile solids). When the incinerator is operating at its design capacity with 27% dry solids (75% volatile), or greater, the incinerator should theoretically operate autogenously (thermally self-supporting), and supplemental fuel should only be required for start-up. 5-12 Packet Page 187 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The incinerated sludge byproducts are gases and ash. The gases and ash exit the top of the incinerator and pass through a heat exchanger. The heat exchanger pre -heats the incinerator fluidizing air. The exhausted gas and ashes pass through a wet Venturi cyclone scrubber for particulate removal, followed by a wet tray scrubber where the finer particulate is removed and the gas is cooled by passing the scrubbed gas (which is re- heated with diesel fuel) counter -current to a large quantity of water. Combustion air is routed to the stack at about 10% of total combustion air to prevent a visible steam plume when it is released through a stack to the atmosphere. The captured ash is thickened in a gravity thickener and dewatered in a vacuum filter. Current operations produce, on average, about 25 cubic yards of ash a week. Plant Effluent The treated and disinfected effluent is discharged approximately 1,250-feet off shore through a 36-inch outfall into Puget Sound. The outfall branches into two diffusers, each 160 feet long with diffuser ports at MLLW elevation that ranges from 56 to 73 feet deep. A layout of the Edmonds WWTP is shown in Figure 5.4. Historical loadings and anticipated plant improvements are discussed in Chapter 8. 5-13 Packet Page 188 of 895 DAYTON ST. CHLORINE CONTACT CHAMBER EFFLUENT SECONDARY CLARIFIER NO. 2 w z g z CHLORINE O Q D MIXING w BASIN SECONDARY Q CLARIFIER c SECONDARY NO. 1 `\1 w CLARIFIER LL NO. 3 RAS PUMPING STATION (BELOW) AERATION AERATION AERATION BASINS BASINS BASINS No. 3 No. 2 No. 1 I <— EDMONDS i— RICHMOND BEACH PRIMARY PRIMARY PRIMARY CLARIFIER F MOUNTLAKE TERRACE CLARIFIER CLARIFIER NO. 2 NO. 1 INFLUENT PUMPING NO. 3 STATION RAW SLUDGE PRIMARY INFLUENT PUMPING SPUTTER BOX ROOM SOLIDS PROCESS BUILDING OPERATIONS BUILDING OP 6 ),1j BHC Consultants, LLC �� Q,) WWTP Layout Figure 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 i 206.505.3400 Comprehensive Sewer Plan �� C 206.505.3406 (fax) Edmonds, Washington J w CONSULTANTS ..bhcconsultants..rn i o May 2012 Y Packet Page 189 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 5.5 Additional Regulatory Requirements Substitute Secondary House Bill 1338 — Wastewater Reuse While reuse of reclaimed wastewater treatment plant effluent is becoming more and more common, the demand for year-round reclaimed effluent in the Pacific Northwest is very limited, particularly in a suburban setting. To be acceptable for reuse, effluent must meet the quality standards specified in the state's Water Reclamation and Reuse Standards. 5.6 Infiltration and Inflow The District maintains a pro -active approach to I and I reduction. In 1979, the City embarked on an aggressive program to reduce inflow by eliminating roof drain connections and other stormwater connections and by sealing manholes. Monitoring the peaking factors during large storm events in the 1980's and 1990's showed that the effort to reduce I&I appeared to be working. However, a storm in late January, 2006 raised new concerns. Flow measurements indicated higher than normal peaking factors and thus increased I&I for this storm. A 2010 1&1 study was performed by BHC Consultants in order to address these concerns (see Appendix A). The study identified key areas within the system that are predicted to have higher I&I than other areas of the system. The areas and the efforts are explained further below: 5.6.1 Zone 1 Problem Area The Zone 1 basin was predicted to have the highest I&I problems and is tagged as an area of concern. The prediction is based off of higher than normal peaking factors in gallons per acre day. It was recommended to T.V. inspect and smoke test areas within this basin to further identify the exact pipe sections and manholes that can be fixed. 5.6.2 LS-01 Zone LS-01 Zone was predicted to have the second worse I&I problem out of all the sub - basins. Out of the three storm events, analyzed in the study, the peaking factor from average dry weather flow was over 5. The study recommends further T.V. inspection and smoke testing in the LS-01 zone to identify the exact lengths of pipe and manholes that need to be fixed. 5.6.3 MLT Zone The MILT Zone was also identified as a higher than normal I&I area. The City will continue to take a pro -active approach to reducing I&I in the system and therefore avoiding larger than normal flows at the plant during high precipitation storm events. 5-15 Packet Page 190 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Chapter VI — EXISTING AND FUTURE POPULATION AND FLOW PROJECTIONS 6.1 POPULATION 6.1.1 General Baseline population (Population 2010) estimates per Sub -basin were calculated using 2010 Census data. A residential density was calculated for each census tract based on current residentially zoned acreage, and that density was applied to the total residential acreage within each Sub -basin. A further breakdown of the methodology used as well as resources can be found in Appendix C. 6.1.2 Existing Residential, Commercial and Student Populations Table 6.1 identifies the eleven Sub -basins that flow to the Edmonds WWTP and the twelfth Sub -basin presented on Figure 5.1 is the Lynnwood Zone Sub -basin. Flows from this area are within the Edmonds City limits but are treated at the Lynnwood WWTP. For the purposes of this Comprehensive Plan, the flows from the Lynnwood Zone Sub -basin were analyzed and included the CIP. The sewer generating categories were classified into residential population, employees and students. Existing population for each of these categories was available through Snohomish County or the Edmonds School District. There are portions of the Richmond Beach Sub -basin that are not sewered and that percentage is reflected in the sewered population values on Table 6.1. Other than these large tracts, it has been assumed that virtually all parcels are sewered. It is recognized, however, that there might be an occasional and isolated parcel that is not served. These isolated parcels constitute a small percentage and are reflected in Table 6.1. All commercial (i.e. employees) and student populations were counted as sewered. There are no industrial dischargers to the Edmonds system. Historical and textbook values of domestic wastewater (i.e. little or no 1/1 contribution) assigned to residential customers are typically found to be between 50 and 60 gals per capita per day (gpcd). Students and employees are generally found to be a fraction of the contribution of a full time resident. Historical values for students have been found to range from 10 to 15 gallons per student per day. Textbook values per employee can vary broadly depending on the nature of the commercial use. The typical per employee contribution ranges from 15 to 25 gallons per employee per day. This range is consistent with the values used by both the Alderwood Water and Wastewater District's Comprehensive plan dated 2009 and the City of Lynnwood's Comprehensive Plan dated 2012. Based on these values, a ratio for students and employees was established so a population equivalence could be developed. Five students generate the same volume of wastewater as a full time resident, or a 5 to1 ratio for students. Similarly, a 3 to 1 ratio is 6-1 Packet Page 191 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN expected for employees. The development of the Population Equivalence (see Table 6.1) was based on these ratios. This means that a resident living in the Sub -basin would be counted as one and all students would be counted as 20% and all employees would be counted as 0.33 people. This formula was applied to the population, employees and students to determine the Population Equivalent. Table 6.1 City of Edmonds - Existing Population 2010 Student Population Employment Population Population Total Total Sewered Sub -Basins Total Total Equivalent Population Population Employment 1 Population (2) M Meter 1 1,788 1,788 1,535 1,722 2,644 Zone 1 2,686 2,686 592 378 2,959 Zone 2 4,835 4,815 4,585 0 6,342 Meter A 12,075 12,075 1,657 1,691 12,965 Meter B 4,473 4,249 2,664 450 5,226 Meter C 1,486 1,412 182 0 1,472 Meter E 5,828 5,537 5,367 1,372 7,598 MILT Zone 10,626 10,095 1,604 1,177 10,864 Edmonds Zone 10,790 10,790 3,558 503 12,075 LS #1 6,410 6,090 508 1,181 6,495 Richmond Beach Zone 19,755 17,037 7,528 17,617 23,067 Lynnwood Zone 6,528 6,202 509 0 6,371 Notes 1. The ratio of flow per employee to flow per resident is assumed to be 1:3 (DOE, Criteria for Sewage Works Design - Orange Book). 2. The ratio of flow per employee to flow per resident is assumed to be 1:5 (DOE, Criteria for Sewage Works Design - Orange Book). These population numbers were assigned to the geographic Sub -basin. Furthermore, forecasted values of population, employment and students also followed these Sub -basin boundaries. 6.1.3 Future Residential, Commercial and School Populations The task of this Plan is to evaluate the performance of the sewer collection, conveyance and treatment components for baseline (existing), 6-year, 20-year and build out scenarios. To evaluate the conditions on these target years, the Plan determined the residential, commercial and student populations for the years 2019, 2033 and build out. Various sources of data were used to estimate these populations and employment 6-2 Packet Page 192 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN figures. These sources include the following: • 2010 Census Data, by Census Block • 2010 Covered Employment Estimates, Washington State Employment Security Department, provided as custom estimates via PSRC • 2008-2010 Three -Year American Community Survey, Self -Employment Estimates for Edmonds • Office of Financial Management, Population Estimates for 2011 and 2012 • Snohomish County 2012 Buildable Lands Report • Snohomish County Draft Initial Growth Targets for 2035 • King County 2007 Buildable Lands Report • City of Shoreline Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Buildable Lands Capacity Update, 2012 • Shoreline Community College Unduplicated Annual Head Count • Edmonds School District Update of Long Range Enrollment Projections 2012 to 2032 • Conversations regarding local long-range planning efforts with City Staff in Edmonds, Shoreline, and Mountlake Terrace; the Snohomish County Demographics Team; and staff and facility planners at school districts and at individual schools. The population was then distributed to the 12 Sub -basins, described earlier, so the hydraulic model could be define that infrastructure that was at or approaching its maximum capacity. The City of Edmonds service area spans two counties and serves several cities or Special Service Districts. Consequently, there were several document sources that were used to determine the future population/employees. Residential population baselines have been established for each Sub -basin based on Census data. Employment baselines have been established for each Sub -basin from PSRC custom estimates for State -reported Covered Employment; self-employment estimates have been added to calculate baseline total employment for each Sub -basin. The Richmond Beach Zone Sub -basin straddles the Snohomish -King County boundary. For the purpose of these forecast estimates, two separate evaluations, prepared for the portions of the Richmond Beach Zone Sub -basin in each County, have been added together to compute a final estimate for the entire Sub -basin for each target year. King County Population and Employment Forecast. King County forecast estimates are based on the 2007 Buildable Lands Report, for Shoreline's primarily residential zoning, and on the 2012 Update to the Shoreline Comprehensive Plan, which included updated population and employment capacity estimates specifically along the Aurora/Highway 99 Corridor. The City of Shoreline is planning for significant increases in development along this corridor, impacting population and employment Richmond Beach Zone Sub -basin, Meter C Sub -basin, and Meter B Sub -basin. The 2031 horizon for this report has been used as an interpolation point from which to estimate forecasts for the target yeas; this interpolation has been extended to estimate a build out scenario as well. 6-3 Packet Page 193 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Snohomish County Population and Employment Forecast. Snohomish County 6-year population forecast estimates are based on the 2012 Buildable Lands Report, which offers detailed capacity analysis based on both underlying city zoning and market trends. The 20-year estimates are based on the County's 2035 Initial Growth Targets, aspirational estimates which are to be adopted into the countywide planning policies; these will assist with the next GMA-mandated round of comprehensive plan updates. However, Edmonds City Staff feels that these Initial Growth Targets are based on past market trends and do not account for a potential market shift favoring the significantly more dense, multi -story, mixed use development currently permitted in the zoning along Highway 99. The City of Edmonds has loosely approximated additional population and employment in selected sub -basins in order to approximate the scenario within which market conditions favor a shift towards this additional density along Highway 99 sometime within the next 20 years. The 2035 horizon for the Initial Growth Targets has been used as an interpolation point from which to extend forecast estimates out to a build out scenario for residential population. The employment capacity expressed in the 2012 Buildable Lands Report, with market reductions removed, stands in as the data point for the estimated employment buildout scenario Student Enrollment Baselines and Forecast Estimates Individual Schools and School Districts have been surveyed to gather baseline enrollment statistics. The Edmonds School District provided a long-range forecast report recommending consideration of a medium -growth scenario throughout the school district. These growth rates have been applied to the District schools within the Service Area. Private schools are generally assumed to retain stable student enrollment populations through time, and none within the Service Area reported plans for major expansions. Shoreline Community College, with no major plans for facility expansion, also expects a relatively stable on -campus student population in the future; anticipated increases in enrollment are likely to be offset by concurrent increases in student participation in distance learning programs. The summary of this analysis is presented in Table 6.2. 6.2 FLOWS 6.2.1 General Edmonds is fortunate to have ten functioning and reliable flow meters. These flow meters are presented schematically on Figure 5.2. An eleventh flow meter (Meter 4) has not been maintained or calibrated. Consequently, this data is not available or is thought to be unreliable. 6-4 Packet Page 194 of 895 Table 6.2 City of Edmonds - Population and Growth Projections 2019 2033 Buildout Total Population Total Population Total Population Sub -Basins Total Sewered Sewered Sewered (1) Total Sewered Sewered Sewered (1) Total Sewered Sewered Sewered (1) Population Population Employment Students Equivalence Population Population Employment Students Equivalence Population Population Employment Students Equivalence City of Edmonds Meter 1 1,867 1,867 1,567 1,745 2,738 2,361 2,361 1,616 1,943 3,288 4,017 4,017 1,677 2,410 5,057 Zone 1 2,908 2,908 751 383 3,235 3,413 3,413 999 427 3,831 4,754 4,754 981 529 5,186 Zone 2 5,280 5,280 5,088 0 6,974 6,691 6,691 5,870 0 8,646 10,874 10,874 6,507 0 13,041 Meter 13,597 13,597 2,221 1,710 14,679 15,417 15,417 3,097 1,877 16,824 18,438 18,438 4,171 2,268 20,281 Meter B 6,471 6,471 3,714 440 7,796 11,056 11,056 5,347 443 12,925 20,880 20,880 8,847 450 23,916 Meter C 1,775 1,775 332 0 1,886 2,413 2,413 565 0 2,601 3,811 3,811 1,065 0 4,166 Meter E 6,170 6,170 5,674 1,390 8,337 6,579 6,579 6,152 1,548 8,937 7,258 7,258 6,738 1,920 9,886 MLT Zone 11,414 11,414 1,721 1,191 12,225 12,356 12,356 1,904 1,313 13,253 13,920 13,920 2,128 1,599 14,948 Edmonds Zone 11,752 11,752 3,842 509 13,133 12,901 12,901 4,284 561 14,440 14,810 14,810 4,826 685 16,554 LS #1 6,631 6,631 511 1,197 7,041 6,895 6,895 516 1,333 7,333 7,333 7,333 523 1,653 7,838 Richmond Beach Zone 24,933 22,440 9,232 15,540 28,622 34,430 32,709 11,883 16,347 39,935 54,141 54,141 17,486 17,817 63,527 Lynnwood Zone 6,754 6,754 514 0 6,925 7,024 7,024 521 0 7,197 7,473 7,473 531 0 7,650 1. The ratio of flow per employee to flow per resident is assumed to be 1:3 and ratio of 1:5 for students (DOE, Criteria for Sewage Works Design - Orange Book). Packet Page 195 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Flow data from these ten meters was collected from July 2006 through November 2012. A graphical representation of this flow data is presented in Appendix B. In order to capture different flow scenarios four flow conditions were graphed. These four flow conditions were the Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather and Maximum Month. Graphical presentation of the Peak Day and Peak Hour was not viewed as meaningful. Total daily flow data for this six and half year period was evaluated. • Average Dry Weather Flow — This flow condition is defined as the average daily flow for the months of July through October when no rainfall was recorded. As expected, the flow was very stable during this period. Any day with measureable rainfall was excluded from the data set. The intent of presenting this data is to capture the base domestic flow conditions with neither infiltration nor inflow. • Average Daily Flow — This flow condition captured all daily flows during the year. The average of all these flows would be considered the annual average flow. • Average Wet Weather Flow — This flow condition is defined as the average daily flow from the months of November through March. All flows during this period were analyzed regardless of the amount of precipitation. The value of this data set was to understand the I&I contribution to the system. • Maximum Month Flow — The Maximum Month Flows are of particular interest for the WWTP. Since the NPDES permit is written with monthly discharge limitations, treatment plants are typically designed with this flow condition as the design flow. The determination of this value was based on the highest monthly average flow. • Peak Day Flow — The Peak Day Flow is the maximum total daily flow recorded at the meters during a 24-hour period. In December 2006 and December 2007, the area experienced an abnormally high rainfall event. This translated to record flows at the ten meters and at the WWTP. These rainfall events have not been replicated since that time. • Peak Hour Flow - Peak Hour Flow is defined as the peak sustained flow rate occurring during a one -hour period. It is typically used to size the collection and interceptor sewers, pump stations, piping, flow meters, and certain physical WWTP processes. The Peak Hour flows were determined from two factors: 1) the addition of diurnal flow patterns which were developed from 5-minute flow data for the year 2009 (see Figure 6.1) and 2) the peaking factor between peak day and peak hour which was derived from 5-minute data. 6.2.2 Recorded Flows The graphical presentation of the flow data starting in July 2006 through November 2012 is displayed in Appendix B and summarized on Table 6.3. It is meaningful to evaluate the entire period to understand the growth or trending during this six and half year period. However, averaging this entire time period was not representative of the current day flows. There are several factors that are effect the flow patterns at the meters. These 6-6 Packet Page 196 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN include: • City pipeline rehabilitation projects • New sewer line extensions • New customers and connections • Degradation of the pipelines. King County has concluded from their studies that there is a 7% degradation of the pipe, and hence a 7% increase in I&I, every decade. Viewing the flow graphs for this period, it appears that these factors are offsetting. There is not any trending patterns over the period. This is perhaps understandable since much of the service area is built out and largely sewered. Consequently, flow data for the years 2010 through 2012 were used to capture the current conditions. The components of wastewater flow evaluated include: Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF), Annual Average Daily Flow (AAF), Average Wet Weather Flow (AWWF), Maximum Month Flow (MMF), Peak Day Flow (PDF) and Peak Hour Flows. A summary of the flow events was derived by summing the flows from the three influent meters (MILT, Edmonds and Richmond Beach) at the WWTP for the period of 2010 through 2012. It should be noted that these values are not necessarily the peak recorded flows for the plant. Significant storm events in 2007 and 2009 resulted in flows in excess of that which is presented below: Current Influent Flows' Edmonds WWTP Average dry weather flow (ADWF), mgd 3.97 Annual average flow (AAF), mgd 5.82 Average wet weather flow (AWWF)3, mgd 7.52 Maximum month flow (MMF)4, mgd 9.66 Peak day flows (PDF), mgd 21.65 Peak wet weather flow6 (PWWF), mgd 27.5 Notes: 1. Values represent flow events from 2010 to 2012. 2. ADWF is defined as the average of the days with zero rainfall during four dry weather months (July through Oct) for years 2010 to 2012. 3. AWWF is defined as the average of five wet weather months (November through March) for years 2010 to 2012. 4. Maximum month flow (MMF) is the average flow for the maximum month, as defined in the current NPDES permit. The MMF is sometimes referred to as peak month flow and is considered the design flow for the WWTP. 5. Peak Day Flow is from wet weather event on 12/12/2010. It should be noted that the historical high daily flow of 23.84 mgd was recorded on 12/3/2007. 6. PWWF is an estimate value using the peak hour to peak day ratio seen from the December 3, 2007. This factor was approximately 1.27. It should be noted that the historical high peak flow of 30.26 mgd was recorded on 12/3/2007. 6-7 Packet Page 197 of 895 Figure 6.1 Diurnal Flow I Al N 1.20 V) 1.00 0.80 0 0.60 " 0.40 �I 1 )I 11� Oa Oa Oa Oa Oa Oa O� O� Oq O� O� O� O O O Packet Page 198 of 895 Table 6.3 City of Edmonds - Measured Flows by Meter Average Dry Weather I'I Average Daily Flow l21 Average Wet Weather (al Maximum Month (2) Peak Day (2) Size in Population Flow per Flow per Flow per Flow per Flow per Meters Sub -basins Acres Equivalent ls) Flow mgd Equivalent Flow mgd Equivalent Flow mgd Equivalent Flow mgd Equivalent Flow mgd Equivalent Meter 1 Meter 1 161.0 2,644 Total Meter 1 161.0 2,644 0.140 53 0.161 61 0.173 65 0.225 85 0.555 210 Meter 2 324.3 2,959 Meter 1 161.0 2,644 Total Meter 2485.3 5,603 0.249 44 0.335 60 0.422 75 0.605 108 1.74 311 Meter A Meter A 1602.4 12,965 Total Meter A 1602.4 1 12,965 0.703 54 1 0.974 75 1.214 94 1 1.602 124 3.723 287 Meter B Meter B 555.0 5,226 Total Meter B 555.0 5,226 0.257 49 0.304 58 0.352 67 0.448 86 1.33 254 Meter C = 143.3 1,472 Total Meter C 143.3 1,472 0.076 52 0.115 78 0.147 100 0.215 146 0.646 439 Meter D 663.0 7,598 525.5 6,342 324.3 2,959 EMeter 161.0 2,644 1673.8 19,543 1.250 64 1.449 74 1.628 83 1.949 100 4.293 220 Meter E 663.0 7,598 Total Meter E 663.0 7,598 0.498 66 0.563 74 0.617 81 0.896 118 2.441 321 Meter 3 ter C 143.3 1,472 Meter B 555.0 5,226 Meter A 1602.4 12,965 Meter E 663.0 7,598 Zone 2 525.5 6,342 324.3 2,959 Meter 1 161.0 2,644 Total Meter 3 3974.5 39,206 1.031 26 1.937 49 2.911 74 3.665 93 5.273 134 MLT at WWTP MLT Zone 1573.9 10,864 143.3 1,472 Meter B 555.0 5,226 Meter A 1602.4 12,965 Meter E 663.0 7,598 Zone 2 525.5 6,342 324.3 2,959 Meter 1 161.0 2,644 Total MLT at WWTP 5548.4 1 50,070 1.500 1 30 2.560 51 3.576 1 71 4.398 88 1 7.826 156 Edmonds hm Edmonds 1415.8 12,075 at WWTP LS-01 Zone 1106.6 6,495 Total Edmonds at WWTP 2522.4 18,570 1.406 76 1.715 92 1.982 107 2.455 132 6.22 335 Richmond B 4054.4 at WWTP Total RB at WWTP 4054.4 23,067 1.060 46 1.542 67 1.967 85 2.803 122 7.601 330 (1) Average Dry Weather Flow is defined as the average daily for months of July through October with days of zero rainfall for years 2010 - 2012. (2) Flow Data obtained from City provided information. Consolidated from monthly Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR's), for years 2010 - 2012. (3) Average Wet Weather Flow is defined as the average flow from the months of November through March for years 2010 - 2012. (4) Peak Hour data derived from Peak day x 1.27 peaking factor at the WWTP which accounts for the diurnal flow patterns plus the peak storm event (5) Population Equivalent is 2010 values see Table 6.1 Packet Page 199 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN A graphical presentation of flow at the WWTP for the period of record (2007 through 2012) is presented in Figure 6.2. A visual comparison of the 2007 and 2010 storm events is evident. The flow per population equivalent as presented on Table 6.3, shows some slight variability in the values. In particular, the data measured in Meters 3 and the MILT meter at the WWTP reflects per population equivalent values that are unusually low. However, these two meters are downstream of the flow diversion to King County and consequently reflect lower total flows coming into the Edmonds system. This explains the low per population equivalent values seen at these two meters. Figure 6.2 Edmonds Wastewater Flows Edmonds WWTP Flows (mgd) Precipitation (inches) 35 0.0 1.0 30 2.0 3.0 25 4.0 W o 20 5.0 6.0 u i LL 7.0 c m 15 8.0 +° v 9.0 10 10.0 a 3 11.0 5 12.0 13.0 0 14.0 A A A A A 1 W W W W W�b 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O y y y y y y OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NNNNNN'y;y'y'y;y;y �J r as �J �t �t �J r as �J �� ¢t tJ t: Q �� t ¢� tJ i� Q �A� �t ¢< tJ t� Q ,'� � ¢� � 'o Qe �j� 0 'o a P� ��o ��a��a� �o ��a �o �o �a �a P pc Q��o,� 2� �� Date 6.2.3 Estimated Future Flows The application of the appropriate per population equivalent value is the basis for the future flow projections. With differing demographics and residential/commercial composition, each Sub -basin will have different per equivalent contribution. Therefore, it is recommended that the derived values be applied for the future growth conditions as presented below: • Sub -basin Meter 1 — use values from Meter 1 6-10 Packet Page 200 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN • Sub -basin Zone 1 — use values from Meter 2 • Sub -basin Zone 2 — use values from Meter 2 • Sub -basin Meter A — use values from Meter A • Sub -basin Meter B — use values from Meter B • Sub -basin Meter C — use values from Meter C • Sub -basin Meter E — use values from Meter E • Sub -basin MLT Zone — this sub -basin is influenced by the flow swap. The determination of the appropriate flows can be reach by either subtracting the Meter 3 data from the MLT meter data or by using data from a non -subtraction meter such Meters A, B, C or E. Subtracting Meter 3 data from MLT meter results in data that is very close to Meter B flow data. Therefore, the forecast has used values from Meter B. • Sub -basin Edmonds Zone — use Edmonds meter at the WWTP • Sub -basin LS#1 — use Edmonds meter at the WWTP • Sub -basin Redmond Beach Zone — use Richmond Beach meter at WWTP • Sub -basin Lynnwood Zone — this Sub -basin flows to the Lynnwood WWTP. The only flow records available for this Sub -basin are from the single effluent flow meter at the WWTP. The per population equivalent values used on Tables 6.4, 6.5 and 6.6 originate from the corresponding values in Table 6.3, as noted above, and have a 7% per decade pipe degradation factor for the increased 1/1. The 7% factor is applied to the 1/1 component for all the flow scenarios except the Average Dry Weather Flows, which by definition, has little or no 1/1 contribution. 6.3 WWTP FLOWS Comparing historical flows with forecasted flows requires an understanding of the King County Interlocal Agreement. Historically, as described in Section 3.4.2, a seasonal flow swap with King County was executed that sent all winter and spring flows from both Richmond Beach and the flows at the Lake Ballenger PS to Edmonds. The summer flows were swapped such that the volumetric flows from Richmond Beach were directed to King County. Effective in 2012, the agreement calls for all flow throughout the entire year to be swapped with King County. This means that the total volume of wastewater received by Edmonds will be reduced. Consequently, the WWTP flow projections reflect this change in operation. Table 6.7 presents the forecasted flows at the WWTP. These flows are the basis for the WWTP loadings shown on Table 8.1 6-11 Packet Page 201 of 895 Table 6.4 2019 Flow Projections Average Dry Weather Average Daily Average Wet Weather Maximum Month Peak Day Flow per Flow per Flow per Population Population Population Sub -Basins Equivalence Population Sewer Flow Population Sewer Flow Population Sewer Flow Equivalent Sewer Flow Equivalent Sewer Flow (1) Equivalent (2) (gpd) Equivalent (2) (gpd) Equivalent (2) (gpd) (2) (gpd) (2) (gpd) Meter 1 (3) 2,738 53 144,977 61 167,637 66 180,586 86 236,696 217 592,781 Zone 1 (4) 3,235 44 143,520 60 195,495 77 247,830 111 357,916 322 1,040,686 Zone 2 (5) 6,974 44 309,444 60 421,506 77 534,347 111 771,703 322 2,243,825 Meter 14,679 54 795,916 76 1,115,621 95 1,398,754 126 1,856,486 297 4,358,676 Meter B 7,796 49 383,374 59 456,429 68 531,040 87 680,260 263 2,051,222 Meter C 1,886 52 97,352 79 149,407 102 192,119 150 282,882 455 858,159 Meter E 8,337 66 546,466 74 620,787 82 682,531 120 1,001,542 332 2,768,108 MLT Zone (6) 12,225 49 601,206 59 715,771 68 832,775 87 1,066,782 263 3,216,721 Edmonds Zone 13,133 76 994,360 93 1,222,071 108 1,418,831 135 1,767,399 346 4,541,938 LS #1 (7) 7,041 76 533,066 93 655,139 108 760,620 135 947,484 346 2,434,885 Richmond Beach Zone 28,622 46 1,315,255 68 1,938,442 87 2,487,933 125 3,568,814 341 9,772,245 Lynnwood Zone (8) 6,925 76 524,316 1 93 644,386 1 108 748,136 135 1 931,932 346 2,394,919 Notes 1. Values from Table 6.2 2. Value derived from Table 6.3 as modified in Section 6.2.3. An additional allowance of 7% per decade is applied to account for the increased the 1/1 component 3. The values used for Sub -basin Meter 1 are from Meter 1 flow data 4. The values used for Sub -basin Zone 1 are from Meter 2 flow data 5. The values used for Sub -basin Zone 2 are from Meter 2 flow data 6. The values used for Sub -basin MLT Zone are from Meter B flow data 7. The values used for Sub -basin LS#1 are from the Edmonds Meter at the WWTP 8. No Flow data available for Lynnwood Zone, therefore use Edmonds Meter at WWTP Packet Page 202 of 895 Table 6.5 2033 - Flow Projections Average Dry Weather Average Daily Average Wet Weather Maximum Month Peak Day Flow per Flow per Flow per Flow per Flow per Sub -Basins Total Population Population Sewer Flow Population Sewer Flow Population Sewer Flow Population Sewer Flow Population Sewer Flow Equivalence (1) Equivalent (2) (gpd) Equivalent (2) (gpd) Equivalent (2) (gpd) Equivalent (2) (gpd) Equivalent (2) (gpd) Meter 1 (3) 3,288 53 174,100 62 203,871 67 220,883 90 294,602 232 762,433 Zone 1 (4) 3,831 44 169,981 62 237,328 80 305,142 117 447,787 348 1,332,495 Zone 2 (5) 8,646 44 383,615 62 535,605 80 688,649 117 1,010,571 348 3,007,191 Meter 16,824 54 912,230 78 1,313,118 99 1,668,148 133 2,242,113 320 5,379,691 Meter B 12,925 49 635,623 59 768,139 70 903,474 91 1,174,146 283 3,660,939 Meter C 2,601 52 134,298 82 212,863 107 277,326 159 414,310 493 1,282,548 Meter E 8,937 66 585,777 75 672,938 83 745,348 125 1,119,469 357 3,191,214 MLT Zone (6) 13,253 49 651,727 59 787,601 70 926,366 91 1,203,895 283 3,753,695 Edmonds Zone 14,440 76 1,093,286 95 1,367,198 111 1,603,880 140 2,023,170 371 5,360,647 LS #1 (7) 7,333 76 555,240 95 694,350 111 814,552 140 1,027,493 371 2,722,475 Richmond Beach Zone 39,935 46 1,835,116 70 2,786,399 91 3,625,185 132 5,275,128 369 14,744,535 Lynnwood Zone (8) 1 7,197 76 1 544,910 95 681,432 111 1 799,398 140 1,008,378 371 2,671,827 Notes 1. Values from Table 6.2 2. Value derived from Table 6.3 as modified in Section 6.2.3. An additional allowance of 7% per decade is applied to account for the increased the 1/1 component 3. The values used for Sub -basin Meter 1 are from Meter 1 flow data 4. The values used for Sub -basin Zone 1 are from Meter 2 flow data 5. The values used for Sub -basin Zone 2 are from Meter 2 flow data 6. The values used for Sub -basin MLT Zone are from Meter B flow data 7. The values used for Sub -basin LS#1 are from the Edmonds Meter at the W WTP 8. No Flow data available for Lynnwood Zone, therefore use Edmonds Meter at W WTP Packet Page 203 of 895 Table 6.6 Build Out - Flow Projections Average Dry Weather Average Daily Average Wet Weather Maximum Month Peak Day Flow per Flow per Flow per Population Population Population Sub -Basins Equivalence Population Sewer Flow Population Sewer Flow Population Sewer Flow Equivalent Sewer Flow Equivalent Sewer Flow (1) Equivalent (2) (gpd) Equivalent (2) (gpd) Equivalent (2) (gpd) (2) (gpd) (2) (gpd) Meter 1 (3) 5,057 53 267,792 63 316,396 68 344,170 92 464,523 243 1,228,304 Zone 1 (4) 5,186 44 230,119 63 326,891 82 424,336 121 629,304 366 1,900,560 Zone 2 (5) 13,041 44 578,610 63 821,933 82 1,066,946 121 1,582,319 366 4,778,754 Meter 20,281 54 1,099,670 80 1,612,604 102 2,066,863 138 2,801,249 336 6,815,764 Meter B 23,916 49 1,176,124 60 1,436,382 71 1,702,177 93 2,233,766 298 7,117,748 Meter C 4,166 52 215,074 84 348,618 110 458,193 166 691,039 520 2,166,871 Meter E 9,886 66 647,948 76 750,279 84 835,293 129 1,274,531 375 3,706,872 MLT Zone (6) 14,948 49 735,122 60 897,792 71 1,063,924 93 1,396,187 298 4,448,858 Edmonds Zone 16,554 76 1,253,366 96 1,586,667 113 1,874,665 144 2,384,863 389 6,445,956 LS #1 (7) 7,838 76 593,424 96 751,230 113 887,587 144 1,129,148 389 3,051,931 Richmond Beach Zone 63,527 46 2,919,245 71 4,525,435 94 5,941,682 137 8,727,523 389 24,716,116 Lynnwood Zone (8) 7,650 76 579,208 96 733,234 113 866,324 144 1,102,098 389 2,978,820 Notes 1. Values from Table 6.2 2. Value derived from Table 6.3 as modified in Section 6.2.3. An additional allowance of 7% per decade is applied to account for the increased the 1/1 component 3. The values used for Sub -basin Meter 1 are from Meter 1 flow data 4. The values used for Sub -basin Zone 1 are from Meter 2 flow data 5. The values used for Sub -basin Zone 2 are from Meter 2 flow data 6. The values used for Sub -basin MILT Zone are from Meter B flow data 7. The values used for Sub -basin LS#1 are from the Edmonds Meter at the WWTP 8. No Flow data available for Lynnwood Zone, therefore use Edmonds Meter at WWTP Packet Page 204 of 895 Table 6.7 City of Edmonds - WWTP Flow Projections 2019 and 2033 2019 2033 Average Maximum Average Maximum Sub -Basins Annual (gpd) Month (gpd) Maximum Day Peak Hour (gpd) Annual (gpd) Month (gpd) Maximum Day Peak Hour (gpd) (1) (1) (gpd)(2) (2) (1) (1) (gpd)(2) (2) MLT Meter at WWTP Meter 1 168,000 237,000 204,000 295,000 Zone 1 195,000 358,000 237,000 448,000 Zone 2 422,000 772,000 536,000 1,011,000 Meter 1,116,000 1,856,000 1,313,000 2,242,000 Meter B 456,000 680,000 768,000 1,174,000 Meter C 149,000 283,000 213,000 414,000 Meter E 621,000 1,002,000 673,000 1,119,000 MILT Zone 716,000 1,067,000 788,000 1,204,000 3,843,000 6,254,000 17,040,000 25,170,000 4,731,000 7,907,000 22,030,000 32,930,000 Total MILT Meter Edmonds Meter at WWTP Edmonds Zone 1,222,000 1,767,000 1,367,000 2,023,000 LS #1 655,000 947,000 694,000 1,027,000 1,877,000 2,715,000 6,770,000 9,850,000 2,062,000 3,051,000 7,890,000 10,880,000 Total Edmond Meter Richmond Beach Meter at WWTP Richmond Beach Zone 1,938,000 1 3,569,000 1 8,273,000 1 12,037,000 1 2,786,000 1 5,275,000 1 9,642,000 1 13,295,000 Total Richmond Beach Meter 1,938,000 3,569,000 8,273,000 12,037,000 1 2,786,000 5,275,000 9,642,000 13,295,000 Total Flow 7,658,000 12,538,000 32,083,000 47,057,000 9,579,000 16,233,000 39,562,000 57,105,000 Total Flow at WWTP (i.e. accounts for King County flow swap) (3) and (4) 5,720,000 8,969,000 32,083,000 47,057,000 6,793,000 10,958,000 39,562,000 57,105,000 1. Values from Tables 6.4 and 6.5 2. Values for Maximum Day and Peak Hour were derived from the hydraulic model that accounts for short duration storms and flow attenuation. This assumes that all flows (including King County) are sent to Edmonds. Also assumes no backup in the upstream conveyence system. 3. Average Annual and Maximum Month values have subtracted a volume equal to the Richmond Beach values. 4. Maximum Day and Peak Hour values do not subtract the Richmond Beach flows since all flows may be directed to Edmonds for these events. Packet Page 205 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN CHAPTER VII — MODEL CONSTRUCTION AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS 7.1 MODEL SOFTWARE A hydraulic capacity analysis of the City's existing sewer network was undertaken with the use of XPSWMM, version 14.10 by XPSolutions. This software was selected by the City, and have the following key features and advantages: • It offers dynamic modeling capability. • It uses a stable modeling platform. • License upgrades are available if additional model nodes are required or if models are to be connected. • XPSWMM software's is capable of reading and using GIS data files that facilitates data transfer and has shape file viewing capability. • It is widely used by the modeling community in the region including the author. • Licenses are owned by the author, facilitating multi-user development and review. 7.2 MODEL CONSTRUCTION 7.2.1 Data Sources The following information was obtained for use in constructing hydraulic models of the existing sewer network: • City provided GIS base access system including manhole/points, pipes/links, and lift station information • Lift station as -built, record drawings and plan drawings information were provided to supplement GIS data. • Lift Station data sheets were provided, as shown in Table 5.2. Information on planned modifications to the existing sewer network was provided by the City. 7.2.2 Model Coverage 7-1 Packet Page 206 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The City has 11 defined Sub -basins (Figure 5.1), 10 of which collect and convey flow into the Edmonds WWTP. The model only includes the City's physical system attributes (pipes, manholes and lift stations) that convey flow into the Edmonds WWTP, and does not include physical system attributes conveying flow to the City of Lynnwood WWTP. The scope of work limited the extent of importing pipes 8-inches and larger, however with the data available in GIS, it was easier and quicker to incorporate all pipes regardless of size. This allows the model to illustrate physical attributes throughout the City's service area. The modeled area includes all City -owned sewer pipes 8-inches in diameter or greater (with the exception of force mains which have a smaller diameter) within the city limits as determined by GIS shapefiles. The model also contains eight City lift stations (LS) as well as the King County Lake Ballinger Pump Station. 7.2.3 Modeling of Physical System Features The system data obtained from the City's GIS mapping was imported into the model. Existing City GIS information provided used NAD 1983 datum. Manhole rim elevations were augmented using mapping software ArcGIS ArcMap by utilizing the 2-foot contour elevation attribute information provided by the City. Information was spatially joined to each manhole based upon its geographic locations via `closest' definition, and software output created a table matching the closest location elevation to the manhole location. Manhole inverts were calculated from the difference between spatially joined rim elevations, measure down depths and pipe diameters. Pipe/link information was imported from the existing City GIS. The upstream and downstream inverts were assigned via connecting manhole information. The hydraulics were checked for obvious data errors such as incorrect inverts, missing pipe sizes, and negatively sloped pipes. The hydraulics associated with the Lift Stations were investigated based on the most recent available as -built data. Hydraulic revisions included incorporating storage volume for wet well nodes, adding offline storage facilities, adding overflow locations, and adding force mains between the Lift Stations and gravity sewer connections. In XPSWMM, the ability to input base flow and a diurnal pattern is contained within the "Hydraulics" mode. This parameter combination was used in two different ways in subsequent modeling tasks. For model calibration, the average daily dry weather flow (see Table 6.3) was distributed evenly among the manholes in each respective meter basin. Then a diurnal pattern, as derived from meter data collected at the Edmonds treatment plant, was applied to the dry weather flow for the model to generate a 24-hour hydrograph. The RTK method was used in XPSWMM to generate the infiltration and inflow (1&1) component of the total flow. For future flows, the peak daily flow (see Tables 6.4, 6.5 and 6.6) for different future scenarios was distributed among the manholes within each meter basin. In this case, a 7-2 Packet Page 207 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN pattern developed from the calibrated model to represent the I&I response in the pipes was applied. This is further discussed in the Model Calibration and Future Flow Comparison sections. Nine lift stations were modeled throughout the City service area. These stations were modeled as static head pumps based on capacity and the head data provided by the City. LS 2 was modeled as a dynamic head pump because a pump curve was available. It should be noted that three lift stations were rehabilitated late in 2012, which does not correspond to the available monitoring data. Therefore, the old capacity for these LS was used for the calibration exercise and the capacity was upgraded for the future flow analysis exercise. Table 7.1 below shows the pump capacity and provided head for each LS for the calibration period and for the future flow condition. Table 7.1 - Lift Station Modeling Data Calibration Period Future Flow Lift Station No. of Pumps Max Head (ft) Pumping Capacity' (gpm) Max Head (ft) Pumping Capacity' (gpm) 1 I 2 40.0 1,425 40.0 1,425 2 I 2 46.7 128 46.7 128 32 I 2 180.0 90 I 190.0 I 114 52 2 60.0 35 100.0 37 6 2 90.0 335 90.0 335 7 2 45.0 210 45.0 210 8 2 45.0 137 45.0 137 142 2 25.5 33 70.0 37 'Represents pumping rate per pump According to available data, these LS were rehabilitated in 2012 which included increasing LS pumping capacity 3Updated PS curve required due to system backups under future flow estimate The Lake Ballinger PS is also included in the model which had several data unknowns. Most notably, the flow swapping between the City and King County presented a particular challenge because the circumstances of this are mostly unknown or unpredictable. For calibration purposes, the pump curve and a "dummy" overflow weir was used to depict the flow swap. In the future flow conditions, there are times when all the flow is directed to King County and times when all the flow is sent to the City. The flow swap between the City and King County is described in Section 3.4.2. Generally flows from the Lake Ballinger PS enter the City's system for 15 hours per day. However, there are times when flow is directed simultaneously to both agencies. And lastly, there are times when flow is sent exclusively to only the County's system. To capture the most severe flow scenario, the hydraulic analysis was configured with the assumption that all flow was being directed to and through the City's conveyance system. This worst flow condition scenario also assumed a concurrent storm event. This condition is very conservative and captures the most extreme conditions. For future scenarios, the pump curve had to be upsized to prevent backups in the upstream system due to insufficient pumping capacity and increase peak flows. This 7-3 Packet Page 208 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN assumption that calls for upsizing pumps to prevent backups would also apply to the King County Pump Station, even though the City has no control on the County's schedule to implement these modifications. 7.3 LOADING The model was loaded with peak day flow measured at each meter for the initial model calibration. Due to the location of meters throughout the system, some Sub -basin flow loading was calculated by subtraction of measured flow between two flow meters. Following Sub -basin flow calculations, the total Sub -basin flow was evenly distributed between manholes. The intent of the loadings into the sewer system is to determine the total flow along the conveyance system and at the WWTP. The area that flows to Lynnwood WWTP (Sub -basin Lynnwood Zone) enters a large diameter interceptor that is owned and maintained by the City of Lynnwood. This interceptor is the backbone of flows entering that plant. The majority of the Edmonds flow enters this interceptor through 8-inch diameter pipes. The remaining Edmonds' flow is collected and pumped through one of six Edmonds -owned lift stations. The hydraulic analysis of the Lynnwood Zone looks at the tributary area to each of these lift stations and applying the peak hour flow estimations to determine the suitability of the pumping capacity (refer to Table 7.2). 7.4 HYDROLOGIC MODELING In order to perform model calibration to observed flows, the "Runoff" (Rnf) mode of XPSWMM was utilized to introduce hydrologic flow into the model. The Rainfall Dependent Inflow and Infiltration (RDII) module of XPSWMM was used to represent wet weather response in the system. This module relies upon the RTK method of hydrograph generation. Three parameters (R, T, and K) for three different I&I response times (short-, medium-, and long-term) are required. The R parameter is the percentage of rainfall that makes its way into the sewer system, T is the time to peak for that volume of water, and the K determines the duration of the recession limb. The three sets of parameters compute three triangular hydrographs which are added by the method of convolution to generate the total hydrograph. Accepted values based on past engineering experience were used as initial values. These values were adjusted during model calibration so that the peaking factor and daily averages matched within reasonable values. 7-4 Packet Page 209 of 895 Table 7.2 Lynnwood Zone Lift Station Analysis 2010 2019 2033 Build Out Current Rated Lift Stations Capacity (gpm @ Population Peak Hour Flow Population Peak Hour Flow Population Peak Hour Population Peak Hour Flow TDH) Equivalent (gpm) (1) Equivalent (gpm) (1) Equivalent Flow (gpm) (1) Equivalent (gpm) (1) LS #4 (2) 308 gpm @ 164 ft 645 179 675 188 702 195 731 203 LS #9 (5) 332 gpm @ 38 ft 838 233 877 244 912 253 950 264 LS #10 (2) 114 gpm @ 49 ft 204 57 214 59 222 62 231 64 LS #11 (3) 95 gpm @ 73 ft 19 5 20 6 21 6 22 6 LS #12 (3) 308 gpm @ 142 ft 672 187 704 195 731 203 762 212 LS #15 (4) 42 gpm @ 60 ft 22 6 23 6 24 7 25 7 Notes 1) Peak Hour flow rate from DOE Orange Book 2) LS #10 pumps to LS #4 which lifts to the WWTP. 3) LS #11 pumps to LS #12 which lifts to the WWTP. 4) LS #15 pumps directly to the WWTP. 5) LS #9 lifts into the gravity system that enters the Lynnwood Interceptor. Packet Page 210 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 7.5 MODEL CALIBRATION Model calibration is an iterative process to match model predicted values to measured real world data. Average daily flow (ADF) data collected at 10 meter locations between 2006 and 2012 was used during calibration. The purpose of the this modeling exercise was to examine system capacity for the comprehensive plan, therefore the peak daily flow (PDF) from the monitoring period was collected for each meter basin. This value was used as the calibration metric. Sewer system flow is made up of different components, most notably average dry weather flow (ADWF) and I&I. Following storm events, the I&I component is generally much larger than the ADWF component. For model calibration, the flow input into the model was separated into these two components. The ADWF per manhole was broken down for input into the model as follows: Meter ADWF ADWF = No. Tributary MHs In order to represent fluctuations in flow throughout the day, a diurnal pattern was applied to the ADWF component. This pattern was determined by processing 5 minute interval flow data at the Edmonds Treatment Plant for three contiguous dry months of a given year. Figure 6.1 shows this pattern. This same pattern was used for th entire service area. As mentioned in Section 7.4, the RDII module of XPSWMM was used to generate the I&I flow component. Only PDF values were presented in Table 6.3, which means that some portion of the day will have a flow that is lower than average and some portion will have a flow that is above average. The actual shape of this hydrograph for typical storm conditions for the City system is variable. The peak value of the hydrograph is very important because that is the portion of the flow that often causes capacity restrictions. Monitoring data collected at the treatment plant indicated that the peaking factor at the plant was approximately 1.27, meaning the peak flow for the day was approximately 27% higher than the peak day. It was assumed that for meters located upstream in the system the peaking factor would be greater to account for attenuation as the flow moved downstream. A rainfall time -series must be implemented in order to use the RDII module. A typical rainfall pattern for western Washington based on the total rainfall for the November 19, 2012 (2.4-inches of total rainfall and was the largest collected in the monitoring period) storm event was used. 7-6 Packet Page 211 of 895 Figure 7.1 - Rainfall Hyetograph used for Calibration 0.14 0.12 r 0.06 0.02 0 zz.00gM zZ.00aM COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 1�-00 1�'O0 1�'0O qM pM qM Time (hours) The model was run for two days to allow for some antecedent condition buildup. Figure 7.1 above shows the rainfall time series that was used for the calibration procedure. The first day had the same rainfall pattern applied with 1-inch of total rainfall, to build antecedent conditions, before the second day with 2.4-inches of total rainfall. The flow "swapping" situation at the KC Lake Ballinger Pump Station presented a considerable challenge during model calibration. Mass balance analysis determined that for the peak flow periods being considered, an average of approximately 4.2 MGD (6.5 cfs) of flow is sent towards Edmonds from the KC pump station. Thus, the total pumping capacity at the pump station was set to 6.5 cfs and a weir was added to allow additional flow to leave the model (this represented the flow being sent towards King County). A significant portion of the flow seen at the total MLT meter at the plant is being sent from the KC Lake Ballinger PS (refer to Figure 5.2 for meter schematic). The service area is divided up into Sub -basins. The flow from different "meter" areas had flow contributions that are measured directly at a meter location. The flows from the "zone" areas had to be determined from a mass balance exercise. These numbers can be somewhat unreliable. But in the absence of any other information, the modeled used this available data in the calibration exercise. Table 6.3 shows the mass balance results and the target PDF numbers used in calibration. Table 7.3 shows the PDF at each meter location, the model predicted average, the assumed peak hourly flow at each meter, and the model predicted peak hourly flow. 7-7 Packet Page 212 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Table 7.3 - Calibration Result Summary Model Model Assumed Diff Peak Peak Observed Diff Model Flow Meter Flow Peak Flow ° (�0) Day Peak Day ° Peak:Peak (�0) (cfs)' Flow Flow (cfs) Day (cfs) (cfs) Total Meter D 10.95 8.44 3.24 1 2.61 29.7% 6.74 6.64 1.89 2.06 1.5% 1.62 Total Meter B 24.3% -8.3% 1.72 Total Meter A 8.33 7.32 13.8% 5.07 5.76 -12.0% 1.64 Total Meter 2 3.80 3.42 11.0% 2.28 2.69 -15.3% 1.67 Total Meter 1 1.32 1.09 20.7% 0.79 0.86 -7.6% 1.66 Total Edmonds 14.01 12.22 14.6% 8.04 9.62 -16.5% 1.74 Total MLT Zone 15.47 15.38 0.6% 11.47 12.11 -5.3% 1.35 'Based on 1.27 peaking factor at the treatment plant The focus of calibration was at the Edmonds Treatment Plant with the meters Total MLT Zone and Total Edmonds having the most emphasis as they are nearest the treatment plant. The Total Edmonds meter is heavily influenced by a nearby LS and this greatly impacted the average flow. Because limited data is available for calibration, a percent difference between model predicted PDF and the monitoring PDF of +/- 20% was determined to be satisfactory. The assumed peak flow shown in Table 3 was determined by multiplying the monitored PDF value by 1.27 (the peaking factor at the plant). This value was not explicitly used as a calibration metric, but was tracked to ensure peak values predicted by the model were within acceptable ranges compared to the PDF values. 7.6 MODELING ANALYSIS AND RESULTS CAPACITY ANALYSIS The capacity analysis was used to determine which pipes may require upsizing due to current lack of capacity or population growth and deterioration of existing infrastructure. Four conditions for capacity analysis were looked at; 2013 (existing), 2019, 2033, and Buildout. Table 6.3 presents the PDF for each meter basin. Considering the relative uncertainty involved in using the RDII module for predicting future flows, it was decided to directly input into the model future PDF values distributed among respective meter basins, replacing the ADWF was input during the calibration task. This allows for a methodology that controls exactly how much flow is being entered into the system. Therefore, the RNF mode of XPSWMM and rainfall time series utilized in the calibration exercise were no longer required for capacity analysis. However, hydrograph shape determined during calibration was used to develop a unit hydrograph representing wet weather system response for each meter basin. This diurnal pattern was applied to future flows in determining the peak flow predicted by the model. 7-8 Packet Page 213 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The PDF for each year are shown below in Table 7.4 and the unit hydrograph for meter MLT Zone is shown in Figure 7.2 as an example. Table 7.4 - Peak Average Daily Flow for Capacity Analysis No. '1Lu Tributary " XV "'1" "'1' "'1' GVJJ GVJJ LUIILLVUI LU1114Vu1 in PDF PDF PDF PDF PDF PDF PDF PDF MHsAcres MHs (mgd) (cfs) (mgd) (cfs) (mgd) (cfs) (mgd) (cfs) WTotalMes 161 95 0.56 0.86 0.59 0.92 0.76 1.18 1.23 1.90 Zone 1 324 9 1.19 1.83 1.04 1.61 1.33 2.06 1.90 2.94 Total Meter A 1,602 5 3.72 5.76 4.36 6.74 5.38 8.32 6.82 10.55 Total Meter B 555 2 1.33 2.06 2.05 3.17 3.66 5.66 7.12 11.01 Total Meter C 143 1 0.65 1.00 0.86 1.33 1.28 1.98 2.17 3.35 Zone 2 526 342 0.11 0.17 2.24 3.47 3.01 4.65 4.78 7.39 Total Meter E 663 1 2.44 3.78 2.77 4.28 3.19 4.94 3.71 5.74 MLT Zone 1,574 142 2.55 3.95 3.22 4.98 3.75 5.81 4.45 6.88 Edmonds 1,416 961 4.04 6.26 4.54 7.03 5.36 8.29 6.45 9.97 LS-01 Zone 1,107 821 2.18 3.37 2.43 3.77 2.72 4.21 3.05 4.72 Figure 7.2 - Calibrated Model Diurnal Pattern 1.50 1.25 - 1.00 - 3 0 Y 0.75 0.50 0.25 0.00 0 1 2 3 MLT ZONE: Unit Hydrograph 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Time (hour) 7-9 Packet Page 214 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN To determine which pipes needed to be upsized, the PDF for the Buildout condition was input into the model as outlined above. The simulated ratio of depth of flow to pipe diameter (d/D) was used as the original basis for upsizing. Several iterations were required to upsize pipes in order to create a free flow condition. The model with the upsized pipes that produced a free flow condition for the Buildout scenario was also run with the PDF for the 2013, 2019, and 2033 scenarios. This produced the peak flow that would be going through each pipe for each future flow scenario (Qyear). These values were then compared to each pipe's existing hydraulic capacity (Qcap). When the ratio of Qyear/Qcap exceeded 0.93, the pipe for that scenario was considered surcharged. The following criteria were used to determine which pipes would require upsizing: • Upsize pipes whose capacity is limited (Qbuildout/Qcap > 0.93) • Pipes < 10-inch in diameter whose capacity is limited were upsized to 12-inch • Pipes > 10-inch whose capacity is limited were upsized in 6-inch increments • Some exceptions were made if the pipe was only slightly surcharged and then an increase of 3-inch was applied based on engineering judgment • If any pipes that were not identified as having a Qbuildout / Qcap > 0.93 but have pipes upstream and downstream that were upsized, then these pipes were also upsized for continuity • No pipe offsets were adjusted • No forcemains were upsized • Qyear/Qcap ratio of intermediate scenarios was used to phase the upsizing. Several iterations of this procedure were conducted. In some cases surcharging was allowed, based on engineering judgment, if the pipe was an isolated case. No Flooding was observed in this system. In summary, the pipe diameters were upsized for the Buildout peak flows and phasing was determined using the intermediate scenarios. See Figure 7.3 that summarizes the pipe upsizing results on a map showing existing and proposed pipe diameters color - coded by year in which upsizing will be required. The corresponding table of pipe diameters is also included in Appendix B.1. The proposed pipe diameters are preliminary estimates and should be scrutinized further during design engineering. 7-10 Packet Page 215 of 895 Puget Sound Legend 2013 0 Edmonds WWTP Edmonds Zone . MeterA 2013 - 2019 0 Lynnwood WWTP LS-1 ■ Meter B 2019 - 2033 0 Lift Station MLT Zone . Meter C 2033 - Buildout Emma ■ i City of Edmonds Boundary Zone 1 ■ Meter E — Pipe Diameter — 8" i .3 Service Boundary 8" < Pipe Diameter — 24" 8/12 : Existing/Proposed Pipe Diameter> 24" LS #2 P ,�` LS #1 ♦` *14* 4*"_ `*** Zone 2 0 Richmond Beach Zone Meter 1 �/ Lynnwood Zone N ' 7 �s 12115 �t8 �'►♦ �# °p '��S 1 ■ ■ 7g/t8 24 /24• 24 /36 2q /36 24 /36 I 8/12 .12 8/12 ---- '. g8/12 8/1� 0 8/12 Mete 1 I 1 '♦♦ Z e , Imms♦♦ I ' LS 14 �� Mete ■ Zone 1 � -� i I <L . `L c ■ ?one 3 E O ■ 0 ■ OI C U) Richmond Beach Zone �----------I ■ ■ ■ II II i mm"0201.0 04 %�**I OF EDMO Capacity Limited Pipes: Aqualyze Inc., June 2013 t� ids BHC Consultants, LLC Sewer Zones: City of Edmonds, December 2011 NORTH CAPACITY LIMITED PIPES 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 GIS Data: City of Edmonds, Snohomish County & King County. - Seattle, Washington 98101 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Figure actual conditions. This map is a geographic 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 206.505.3400 representation based on information available. 206.505.3406 fax It does not represent survedata. No warrantOTT Feet """'""'^ Cityof Edmonds C O N S U LTA N T S ,� NY .bhcconsulta ts.com is made concerning the accuracy, currency, y / Scale in FeetJune■ 3 COPYRIGHT© R9 Q5 AAi4j"TA Af.A43WIGHTS RESERVED or completeness of data depicted on this map. Inc 189p 2O 3 �J s COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN FUTURE FLOW COMPARISON The predicted flow was compared to the calculated value at each flow meter for the Buildout scenario as shown in Table 7.5. Table 7.5 - Model Results Comparison for Buildout Condition Flow Meter Model Peak Flow (cfs) Assumed Peak Flow (cfs)' Diff (o ) Model Peak Day Flow (cfs) Model Peak:Peak Da Total Meter D 26.93 22.82 18.0% 17.70 1.52 Total Meter B 17.07 13.99 22.0% 11.02 1.55 Total Meter A 15.82 13.39 18.1% 10.54 1.50 Total Meter 2 7.49 6.15 21.9% 4.81 1.56 Total Meter 1 2.94 2.41 22.0% 1.88 1.57 Total LS-01 Zone 6.36 6.00 6.0% 4.76 1.34 Total Edmonds 18.99 18.66 1.8% 14.5021.31 Total MLT Zone 73.62 63.20 16.5% 49.09 1.50 'Based on 1.27 peaking factor at the treatment plant 2Model predicted portion of flow leaving system through diversion weir at LS-01. Accounted for by adding hydrograph through diversion weir to hydrograph at Total Edmonds Flow Meter in Model Peak and Average Flow in Table. The methodology outlined above allowed for the phasing sequence of the pipe upsizing for each of the flow scenario. The list of the pipes to be updated along with the year of update is provided in Appendix B. Table 7.6 below summarizes the total pipes in the model in addition to those requiring upsizing phased over the four scenarios. Table 7.6 - Modeled Pipe Summary Upsized Pipe Summary Total Model Pipes 2,390 Total Pipes Upsized 227 Pipes Upsized 2013 115 Pipes Upsized 2019 34 Pipes Upsized 2033 46 Pipes Upsized Buildout 32 Minimum Existing Diameter (in) Maximum Existing Diameter (in) Maximum Future Diameter (in) 8 36 42 7-12 Packet Page 217 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 7.7 MODEL LIMITATIONS The list below summarizes the model limitations encountered during this project and should be noted when reviewing or using the results generated by this model. • LS information provided in the form of pumping capacity and corresponding head was assumed to be correct. • The limited information available at KC Lake Ballinger PS including detailed configuration of adjacent pipe networks, the flow swapping with King County, and exact pump operation at this facility introduces uncertainties that could affect model results. Every effort was made to ensure information input into the model was sufficient to perform modeling tasks. 7-13 Packet Page 218 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN CHAPTER VIII — EDMONDS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT 8.1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this section is to evaluate the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant for its ability to meet treatment objectives over the planning period. The Edmonds treatment plant liquid stream consists of a headworks with three mechanical screens, three rectangular primary clarifiers, three aeration basins, three circular secondary clarifiers, and a chlorine contact tank. The disinfected plant effluent is discharged through a single 36-inch diameter outfall into Puget Sound. The outfall branches into two lines 1250 feet out into the bay with two diffusers, each 160 feet long with diffuser ports at MLLW elevation that ranges from 56 to 73 feet deep. The solids stream includes belt press dewatering and incineration of the sludge cake using a fluidized bed incinerator. A detailed description of the existing facilities is presented in Section 5.4. The original Edmonds WWTP was completed in 1957 to treat 2.0 million gallons per day (mgd). Edmonds expanded the primary plant to a design flow of 4.0 MGD in 1959, and for a third time in 1967, to a design flow of 7.6 MGD, by adding two clarifiers and effluent pumping. The third expansion also included dewatering equipment and an incinerator for solids handling. In 1991 the plant was expanded to secondary treatment with a capacity of 11.8 mgd for maximum month loading. A conventional secondary treatment process was implemented consisting of three aeration basins, three circular secondary clarifiers, and a chlorine contact basin. Additionally, new operations and solids handing buildings were constructed. The Edmonds Plant layout is shown in Figure 5.4. 8.2 TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS The Edmonds wastewater treatment plant operates under the terms of NPDES Permit No. WA-002405-8 last modified May 9, 2012. A copy of the permit is included in Appendix K. The treatment plant effluent requirements established by the permit are a maximum monthly concentration of 25 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD5), 30 mg/L for total suspended solids (TSS) and 200/ 100 mL for fecal coliform bacteria density. CBOD5 and TSS effluent limits are also held to an 85% minimum removal. The facility is subject to whichever discharge limit is more stringent when reporting: concentration mg/L or 85% removal. Based on a maximum month design flow of 11.8 million gallons per day (mgd), the average monthly mass discharge limit of 25 mg/L for BOD5 and 30 mg/L for TSS is Packet Page 219 of 895 1 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 2,460 and 2,952 pounds per day respectively. The permit also limits the chlorine residual concentration to 0.191 mg/L. 8.3 TREATMENT PERFORMANCE Figure 8.1 is a plot of the effluent CBOD5 and TSS concentration over the last 10 years. The Edmonds plant is consistently under the monthly average of 25 and 30 mg/L limit for CBOD5 and TSS respectively as stipulated in the NPDES Permit. 35.0 411111 25.0 tuD E y 20.0 LU W 15.0 15 c 0 10.0 5.0 Figure 8.1 Edmonds WWTP - Effluent CBOD,/TSS Conc. +Efluent CBOD t Effluent TSS Effluent CBOD Conc. Effluent TSS Conc. 0.0 ! '!. .I .I........... 1........... 1. .!. .I........... !........... 1. .1 1/2002 1/2003 1/2004 1/2005 1/2006 1/2007 1/2008 1/2009 1/2010 1/2011 1/2012 The determination of the effluent mass discharge is calculated by multiplying the concentration times the daily flow: mg) (million gallons lb l lbs \ L / \ day ) ' 8.34( gall day This formula uses the measured effluent concentrations from limited composite samples and the continuously measured flow values. The results yield the total mass BOD and TSS being discharged from the plant. It should be noted, however, that such calculations tend to over -state the total mass. This is referred to as `flow biasing'. During the wet weather months when extreme flow conditions occur, the extrapolation Packet Page 220 of 895 8 2 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN of those flow conditions throughout the entire month tends to overestimate the total mass discharge. Figure 8.2 is the effluent mass loading. 3,500 3,000 2,500 T to 2,000 C N 1,500 W s = 1,000 0 2 500 Figure 8.2 Edmonds WWTP - Effluent Mass CBODS/TSS i li, MEN INE, r, III FJ IV, � 64. 1- mi 71� � wr , 1 9, 1/2002 1/2003 1/2004 1/2005 1/2006 1/2007 1/2008 1/2009 1/2010 1/2011 1/2012 8.4 NPDES PERMITTED CAPACITY AND HISTORICAL LOADING The NPDES permit specifies the permitted capacity of the plant. The Edmonds WWTP is permitted to treat a maximum monthly flow of 11.8 mgd. The "maximum month" criterion is the highest monthly average loading in one calendar year. Section S4.B: Plans for Maintaining Adequate Capacity, states that the City of Edmonds needs to submit a plan and schedule to Ecology to maintain capacity if the influent flow reaches 85% of the design criteria for three consecutive months. When flows reach 10.03 mgd for three months in a row the City will be subject to this condition. There are three parshall flumes that measures flow at the Edmonds WWTP. As stated in Section 3.4.2, the loading to Edmonds has been largely influenced by the flow swapping agreement with King County through the Lake Ballinger pump station. Figure 8.3 shows a plot of the influent flow over the last 10 years. As shown the flows are well below the plant design flow, or the level that would trigger a plant expansion study. Packet Page 221 of 895 8 3 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 14.0 01VZO 10.0 M CUD E A s 8.0 0 6.0 WD Q 4.0 2.0 0.0 4- 1/2002 Figure 8.3 Edmonds WWTP - Influent Flow NPDES Limit 85% NPDES Limit 1/2003 1/2004 1/2005 1/2006 1/2007 1/2008 1/2009 1/2010 1/2011 1/2012 Average monthly flows through the 10 year period of record show consistent seasonal patterns. Other than one large event in 2006 the influent flow has been far below the NPDES permit. Past flows look to be approaching the 85% limit but this figure does not reflect the new reciprocating flow agreement with King County concerning the Lake Ballinger pump station. The NPDES permitted average BOD and TSS loading design criteria for the plant in section S4.A is 20,000 and 19,200 Ibs/day respectively for maximum month loads. When BOD loads reach 17,000 pounds per day or TSS loads reach 16,320 pounds per day Edmonds will be subject to the 85% planning criteria. Figure 8.4 shows a plot of the influent mass BOD and TSS over the last 10 years. Packet Page 222 of 895 4 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 22,000 20,000 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 3 10,000 8,000 s O 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Figure 8.4 Edmonds WWTP - Influent Mass BODS/TSS Ili 1Wt7VF1X1r'1Fd1Wt =,win mim IU711 IMMMMLILI WIGiLF-J, Influent BOD InfluentTSS -�Mmm 1/2002 1/2003 1/2004 1/2005 1/2006 1/2007 1/2008 1/2009 1/2010 1/2011 1/2012 8.5 VIOLATIONS AND BYPASSES In April 2009 the Edmonds plant received a warning letter from the Department of Ecology (DOE) for being out of compliance with their wastewater discharge permit. The violation was for February 2009 because the discharged TSS did not meet the minimum 85% removal because of some temporary process problems. No further action was taken. Aside from the warning letter, Edmonds has had no violations in the last decade concerning treatment or bypasses. 8.6 FUTURE CAPACITY EVALUATION A capacity analysis has been conducted as part of this comprehensive plan to predict what equipment or processes, if any, are likely to exceed their ability to handle plant flows and loads during the planning period. The capacity analysis is presented as Table 8.1. Taking into consideration the Lake Ballinger pump station flow swap, projections for future flows and loads were made based on predicted population growth for the Edmonds service area. The flow projections calculated for the Edmonds plant gave a maximum monthly flow of 5.72 mgd in the year 2019 and 6.79 mgd in year 2033. Packet Page 223 of 895 5 Table 8.1 Current and Future Loadings to WWTP Design / Plant Design Data Plant Data NPDES Permit WA-002405-8 Projected Metcalf and Eddy DOE Orange Book Component Year 1991 Current Design Year 2009-2011 Year 2019 Year 2033 Typical Design Range Design Range Design Population Equivalent Flow, mgd Average Annual 6.7 9.1 5.79 5.72 6.79 Maximum Month 8.7 11.8 9.66 11.8 8.97 10.96 Peak Hour 31.3 40.0 30.30 47.1 57.1 Max Day 16.8 21.6 21.60 21.5 32.1 39.6 Max flow to secondary 22.9 22.9 22.90 22.9 22.9 BODs, Ibs/day Annual AVG 11,200 15,300 9,611 9,490 11,265 Max Month AVG 14,100 19,200 12,647 20,000 11,744 14,349 Max day 22,400 30,500 16,276 24,188 29,839 TSS, Ibs/day Annual AVG 8,300 11,300 8,051 7,949 9,436 Max month AVG 11,600 15,900 9,615 19,200 8,929 10,909 Max day 21,600 29,400 11,321 16,824 20,755 Per Capita, Ibs/cap/day Annual AVG BOD Annual AVG TSS Effluent Limits CBODS, Ibs/day AVG month, 25 mg/L (NPDES) 2,460 or AVG week, 40 mg/L (NPDES) 3,936 TSS, Ibs/day AVG month, 30 mg/L (NPDES) 2,952 or AVG week, 45 mg/L (NPDES) 4,429 Fecal Coliform Bacteria Monthly geometric mean 200 Weekly geometric mean 400 Chlorine, Ibs/day AVG month (0.191 mg/L, NPDES) 18.8 Max Day (0.442 mg/L, NPDES) 43.5 Headworks Mechanical Bar Screens Number 3 Width, ft 4 Packet Page 224 of 895 Table 8.1 Current and Future Loadings to WWTP Design / Plant Design Data Plant Data NPDES Permit WA-002405-8 Projected Metcalf and Eddy DOE Orange Book Component Year 1991 Current Design Year 2009-2011 Year 2019 Year 2033 Typical Design Range Design Range Design bar spacing, in Parshall Flumes Number Throat, ft 0.5 3 2 Raw Sewage Pumps Number 4 Type vertical, non -clog Capacity, each, gpm 9,260 HP, each 100 Drive type 2 variable, 2 consant Primary Clarifiers Primary Sedimentation Tanks Number 3 3 3 3 3 Clarifiers 1&2 Width, ft 60 60 60 60 60 Length, ft 60 60 60 60 60 Clarifiers 3 Width, ft 45 45 45 45 45 Length, ft 91 91 91 91 91 Average Depth, ft 10 10 10 10 10 Total Surface Area, square feet 11,295 11,295 11,295 11,295 11,295 Surface Load Rate, gpd/sf Annual Average 593 806 513 506 601 1,000 800 to 1,200 Max month 770 1,045 855 794 970 Peak hour 2,771 3,541 2,683 4,170 5,055 2,500 2,000 to 3,000 Detention time, hrs Annual Average 3.0 2.2 3.5 3.5 3.0 Max month 2.3 1.7 2.1 2.3 1.9 2 1.5 to 2.0 Peak hour 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.4 Max Day 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.5 BOD Removal, % Annual Average flow 39% 36% 37% 37% 35% 25 to 40 Maximum month flow 36% 33% 31% 32% 30% Max Day 29% 26% 28% 21% 18% TSS Removal, % Annual Average flow 61% 58% 62% 62% 61% 50 to 70 Maximum month flow 58% 54% 57% 58% 55% Max Day 49% 45% 40% 32% 28% Packet Page 225 of 895 Table 8.1 Current and Future Loadings to WWTP Design / Plant Design Data Plant Data NPDES Permit WA-002405-8 Projected Metcalf and Eddy DOE Orange Book Component Year 1991 Current Design Year 2009-2011 Year 2019 Year 2033 Typical Design Range Design Range Design Aeration Basins Number Width, ft 3 3 3 3 3 58 58 58 58 58 Length, ft 75.3 75.3 75.3 75.3 75.3 Side water depth, feet 20.6 20.6 20.6 20.6 20.6 Volume total, gal 2,018,892 2,018,892 2,018,892 2,018,892 2,018,892 Contact zone volume, gal 348,000 348,000 348,000 348,000 348,000 CMAS Mode Total Detention Time, hr Annual Average 7.2 5.3 8.4 8.5 7.1 Max month 5.6 4.1 5.0 5.4 4.4 3 to 5 Max Day 2.9 2.2 2.2 1.5 1.2 MLSS Conc, mg/L 1,800 1,800 1,708 1,800 1,800 1,500-4,000 QR/Q, mgd/mgd 0.25 to 0.5 F:M Ratio Annual Average 0.23 0.33 0.42 0.20 0.24 Max month 0.30 0.43 0.46 0.26 0.33 0.2 to 0.6 Max Day 0.53 0.75 0.61 0.63 0.81 SRT, days Annual Average 9.3 6.3 9.4 10.0 8.1 Max month 6.2 4.2 6.9 8.0 6.2 3 to 15 Max Day 2.8 1.9 4.2 2.6 2.0 Oxygen Demand, Ib/hr Annual Average 315 452 278 275 333 Max month 413 591 400 367 463 Max Day 733 1041 537 880 1120 Contact Stabilization Mode Contact MLSS Conc, mg/L 1,000-3,000 Contact time, min Annual Average 75 55 87 88 74 Max month 58 42 52 56 46 30 to 60 Peak Hour, w/out bypass 16 13 17 11 9 Peak hour, w/ bypass 22 22 22 22 22 Max Day 30 23 23 16 13 Stabilization MLSS Conc, mg/L 6,000-10,000 Stabilization time, hrs Annual Average 12.0 8.8 13.8 14.0 11.8 Max month 9.2 6.8 8.3 8.9 7.3 Max Day 4.8 3.7 3.7 2.5 2.0 Peak hour, w/ bypass 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 2 Peak Hour, w/out bypass 2.6 2.0 2.6 1.7 1.4 to 4 Packet Page 226 of 895 Table 8.1 Current and Future Loadings to WWTP Design / Plant Design Data Plant Data NPDES Permit WA-002405-8 Projected Metcalf and Eddy DOE Orange Book Component Year 1991 Current Design Year 2009-2011 Year 2019 Year 2033 Typical Design Range Design Range Design QR/Q, mgd/mgd Blowers Number 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 to 1.50 4 Type multi -stage, centrifugal Capacity, each, 3,300 HP, each, cfm 250 RAS Pumps Number 4 Type Horizontal, non -clog centrifugal Capacity, each,gpm 2,100 HP, each 25 Secondary Clarificaters Number 3 3 3 3 3 Diameter, ft 90 90 90 90 90 Side water Depth, ft 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 Total surface area, sq ft 19,085 19,085 19,085 19,085 19,085 Surface loading rate, gpd/sq ft/d Annual average flow 351 477 304 300 356 400 to 700 Maximum month flow 456 618 506 470 574 Peak to secondary (w/out bypass) 1,640 2,096 1,588 2,468 2,992 1,000 1,600 Peak To secondary (w/ bypass) 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 to Total weir length, ft Solids loading, Ib/hr/sf Annual average flow 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Maximum month flow 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.8 to 1.2 Peak hour 1.2 1.57 1.4 1.9 2.2 1.6 Chlorine Contact Chamber Number of Tanks 2 2 2 2 2 Length, ft 251 251 251 251 251 Width, ft 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Side water depth, ft 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 Total volume, gal 320,110 320,110 320,110 320,110 320,110 Dentention Time, min Annual Average 69 51 80 81 68 30 to 120 min 60-120 Maximum month 53 39 48 51 42 Peak hour 15 12 15 10 8 15 to 90 min > 20 Number of Chlorinators Packet Page 227 of 895 Table 8.1 Current and Future Loadings to WWTP Design / Plant Design Data Plant Data NPDES Permit WA-002405-8 Projected Metcalf and Eddy DOE Orange Book Component Year 1991 Current Design Year 2009-2011 Year 2019 Year 2033 Typical Design Range Design Range Design *including portion of outfall Chlorination Equipment Number of Chlorinators 2 2 2 2 2 Capacity, lb/day 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Cylinder Size, Ibs 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Cylinder Storage Number 8 8 8 8 8 Average Daily Demand, Ibs 380 380 380 380 380 Effluent Pumps Number 5 Type Vertical, mixed flow Capacity, each,gpm 7,000 HP, each 100 Drive type (2) VFD, (3) constant Primary Sludge Production Annual Average 4,627 4,932 5,715 Max month 5,733 9,715 11,496 Sludge avg TS, % 3.44% 2-6% Secondary Sludge Production Annual Average 5,484 5,413 6,631 Max month 8,476 7,780 9,915 Sludge avg TS, % 0.65% 0.5 to 1.5% Primary Sludge and Scum Pumps Number 6 21,411 83,898 Type Air operated, diaphram Capacity, gpm 150 Primary Sludge Storage Tanks Number 1 1 1 1 1 Volume, gal 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 29,000 Detention Time, days Annual Average 1.2 1.8 1.7 1.5 Maximum month 0.9 1.5 0.9 0.7 Max day 0.8 0.8 0.8 Mixer type and HP Packet Page 228 of 895 Table 8.1 Current and Future Loadings to WWTP Design / Plant Design Data Plant Data NPDES Permit WA-002405-8 Projected Metcalf and Eddy DOE Orange Book Component Year Current 1991 Design Year 2009-2011 Year 2019 Year 2033 Typical Design Range Design Range Design Primary Sludge Transfer Pumps Number Type Capacity, gpm 2 Air operated diaphram 150 WAS and Secondary Pumps Number 5 Type Progeressive Cavity Capacity, each,gpm 50 HP, each 5 Drive type Constant WAS Storage Tank Number 1 1 1 1 1 Volume, gal 102,000 102,000 102,000 102,000 102,000 Detention Time, days Annual Average 1.7 1.0 1.0 0.9 Maximum month 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.6 Max day 0.6 Mixer type and HP WAS Transfer Pumps Number 2 Type Progeressive Cavity Capacity, each,gpm 150 HP, each 7.5 Drive type VFD Belt Filter Press Number 2 2 2 2 Width,ft 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 Capacity, each, gpm 150 Hours operated/Day Annual Average 12 12 12 12 Max month 17 17 17 17 Max Day 23.7 23.7 23.7 23.7 Loading, gpm, one BP for hours operated Annual Average 108 162 162 197 Max month 116 172 173 218 Max Day 130 187 235 Loading, lb dry solids/hr 509 509 509 Packet Page 229 of 895 Table 8.1 Current and Future Loadings to WWTP Design / Plant Design Data Plant Data NPDES Permit WA-002405-8 Projected Metcalf and Eddy DOE Orange Book Component Year 1991 Current Design Year 2009-2011 Year 2019 Year 2033 Typical Design Range Design Range Design Incinerator Number Type 1 1 1 1 Fluidized bed Diameter, ft 10 10 10 9.7 10 9.7 Capacity, mmbtu 9.7 9.7 Hours Operated Daily Annual Average 12 12 12 12 Max month 17 17 17 17 Max Day 23.7 23.7 23.7 23.7 Capacity, Ib/hr 942 Loading, lb dry solids/hrs operated Annual Average 843 862 1,029 Max month 836 1,029 1,259 Ash Thickening Number 1 Type gravity Diameter, ft 8 Ash Dewatering Number 1 Type vacuum filter Capacity, Ib/hr 200 Ash Production, cy/d Annual Average 2.1 2.1 2.1 Max month 3.2 3.2 3.2 Max Day 4.0 4.0 4.0 Packet Page 230 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN These projected flows are far less than the overall rated capacity of 11.8 mgd for the plant and do not exceed the 85% criteria (10.03 mgd) within the planning period. The projected maximum month BOD loadings for the plant are 11,744 pounds per day in 2019 and 14,349 pounds per day in year 2033. The BOD loading in 2033 is far less than the 85% design criteria let alone the NPDES permitted limit of 20,000 Ibs/day. The projected TSS Ibs/day maximum month loading for the Edmonds plant is 8,949 and 10,909 Ibs/day, in years 2019 and 2033, respectively. The projected TSS load in year 2033 is less than half of the NPDES permitted limit of 19,200 Ibs/day. In addition to the overall plant capacity analysis, the capacity of the plant's individual unit processes were evaluated against typical design values, as shown in literature that is widely consulted in the wastewater engineering field, including "Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse", by Metcalf & Eddy; "Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants" prepared jointly by the Water Environment Federation (WEF) and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE); and "Criteria for Sewage Works Design" (the Orange Book) by the Washington State Department of Ecology Using these projections the capacities of the unit processes were compared with commonly accepted design values, as shown on Table 8.1. The capacity for the mechanical equipment used was based on the manufacturer's rating and the plant design data. None of the unit processes are projected to be significantly overloaded during the planning period. The only unit process that is not meeting typical design criteria is the chlorine contact chamber detention time. The facility, already aware of this, maintains elevated disinfection levels as explained in the Section 5.4.2. Furthermore, the current operation feeds sodium hypochlorite at the secondary clarifier weir overflow which increases the contact time. 8.7 FUTURE REGULATORY ISSUES FOR WWTP The existing liquid stream processing at the Edmonds facility regularly produces compliant effluent and the capacity of the plant can easily handle the projected flows and loads. However, there are three potential regulatory issues that could impact the plant requirements in the future. The potential regulatory issues are: • Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) Air Emissions • Secondary Treatment Bypass • Total Nitrogen Discharge Limits 8.7.1 Sewage Sludge Incineration (SSI) - Air Emissions The most pressing issue is the requirement of new sewage sludge incinerator (SSI) air quality standards. On February 21, 2011, the EPA published their newest final SSI Packet Page 231 of 895 8-13 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN emission regulations in the Federal Register Title 40 Part 60, under the provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 129 "Solid Waste Incineration Units". These new standards supplement the older Clean Water Act (CWA 40 CFR, Part 503) regulations. The new regulations were declared to be effective on May 20, 2011. The regulations dictate different emission limits for new (or substantially modified) incinerators and for existing sewage sludge incinerators; as well as different limits for multiple hearth incinerators and fluidized bed incinerators. Existing SSI units will have 5 years to comply from the effective date of the regulations, or until May 19, 2016. The new CAA regulations will require a Title V air permit. Previous regulations for sewage sludge incinerators (SSI) were based on emission limits established in Title 40 Part 503 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). The previous air quality emission limits were as follows, and the City has been in compliance with these limits: • Particulate matter emission limit of 0.18 g/m3 (0.08 grams/cu ft) dry gas at standard temperature and pressure corrected to 12% carbon dioxide. • Beryllium emission of 10 g per 24-hour period. • Mercury emission limit of 3,200 g per 24-hour period. • Lead, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and nickel feed cake limits based on ambient air quality and health risk specific concentrations. • Total Hydrocarbons monthly average concentration of 100 ppm by volume, corrected to 0% moisture and 7% oxygen. • Carbon monoxide monthly average concentration of 100 ppm by volume, corrected to 0% moisture and 7% oxygen. The new emission limits that apply to the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant are given in Table 8.2 below. The existing SSI regulation is for incinerators that were in operation before the new regulations. New SSI's built, or substantially modified, will be held to more stringent emission limits. Substantial modification includes any revisions to the feed system, reactor, ash system and energy recovery systems; but not the emission control equipment or routine maintenance. In addition to new emission limits, the new regulations will require that compliance tests be conducted annually. The "2007" column in Table 8.2 summarizes data received from the plant for their source emissions evaluation by Am Test -Air Quality, LLC, which was conducted in late May of 2007 and finalized into a report in July 31, 2007. The 2007 evaluation was based on the old regulations, so there are several pollutants (hydrogen chloride, dioxins and furans) that are currently regulated that were not sampled or tested. Packet Page 232 of 895 8-14 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Table 8.2 EPA Emission Limits for Fluidized Bed Incinerators Pollutant Units Existing SSI New SSI 2007 Cd m /dscm @ 7% 02 0.0016 0.0011 0.00031 CO ppmvd @ 7% 02 64 27 1.6 HCI ppmvd @ 7% 02 0.51 0.24 - Hg mg/dscm @ 7% 02 0.037 0.0010 0.053 NOX ppmvd @ 7% 02 150 30 24 Pb m /dscm @ 7% 02 0.0074 0.00062 0.180 PCDD/PCDF, TEQ n /dscm @ 7% 02 0.10 0.0044 - PCDD/PCDF, TMB n /dscm @ 7% 02 1.2 0.013 - PM mg/dscm @ 7% 02 18 9.6 34.8 S02 ppmvd @ 7% 02 15 5.3 10.5 Where: Cd - Cadmium CO - Carbon Monoxide HCI - Hydrogen Chloride Hg - Mercury NOX - Nitrogen Oxides Pb - Lead PCDD/PCDF - Polychlorinated Dibenzo -P-Dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans PM - Particulate Matter S02 - Sulfur Dioxide TEQ -Toxic Equivalency TMB - Total Mass Balance Stack gas emission records are limited. Assuming that this one test is representative of Edmond's sludge, improvements to the existing emission control equipment will be required. However, it should be noted that sludge quality can vary significantly between samples and one sample is not necessarily representative. A significant sampling and testing program is recommended before any modifications are made to the emissions control system. The 2007 report conducted three runs for each of the tests and the sludge was further analyzed during each run. In Table 8.2, the 2007 column has three pollutants that exceed the new regulations for existing SSI's; mercury, lead, and particulate matter. Particulate matter and most metals (except mercury) are removed as solids by the plant's existing Venturi scrubber. Because of its extremely high vapor pressure, mercury is 100% vaporized during the incineration process. so it is not removed by the existing wet scrubber. If mercury cannot be removed by source controls, a new packed -bed carbon scrubber will be required. The particulate matter concentration is above the new regulated threshold. The EnviroCare International VenturiPakTM scrubber system at Edmonds has been widely tested at other locations and generally complies with the new particulate matter regulations for existing incinerators. The VenturiPakT"', if operated optimally, is typically in compliance with the new regulations for existing SSI for Cd, HCI, Pb, PM, and S02. Packet Page 233 of 895 8-15 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The 2007 concentrations are likely the results of the scrubber system not operating optimally. An evaluation of the system was conducted in 2012 which resulted in a new venturi throat and additional sprays were added. A compliance test was conducted in 2013 and all new standards were met. If further optimization of the existing scrubber is needed to meet the new regulations, then additional treatment to remove small (sub -micron) particulates will be required. EnviroCare makes a wet electrostatic precipitator (StarTm ESP) that can be retro-fit with the existing scrubber. The estimated cost of the retro-fit would be about $0.8 million. A pilot test of this equipment is scheduled in 2013. Lead emissions appear to be very high but this is misleading. The first two emission test runs were in compliance but the third test run was 400 times the concentration of the first two. Considering that the lead concentration in the bio-solids varied by only 9% (at one standard deviation) suggests that the concentration found in the third emissions run was invalid. The skewed emissions test run was perhaps a recording, operations, or lab error but it is not likely representative of typical emission levels. A new stack test would confirm this. Mercury emissions are not reduced by the existing scrubber system and other actions will likely be necessary for lowering this emissions concentration. Edmonds has two choices to control mercury emissions: • Require amalgam separators at dental offices • Implement mercury emission removal equipment Amalgams are the mercury fillings used in dentistry. Requiring dentists in the service area to use amalgam separators would decrease the amount of mercury in the waste stream. Amalgam separators would be preferred for Edmonds because of the costs of mercury removal treatment processes. The City has already begun a campaign to reduce these discharges, but results are not yet known. Mercury emission removal equipment, such as that provided by Kombisorbon® would remove 99% of mercury, dioxins, furans and more. The system works by directing the flume gas through a sulfur impregnated activated carbon filter. The adsorbent (activated carbon) can be divided into several layers and removes mercury in all forms through adsorption and chemical reactions. The removal system includes a dust protection layer to extend the life of the activated carbon. The service life of the dust protection and adsorbent layers is estimated to be 3 to 4 years. A budgetary proposal has been received for the Edmonds facility and the system would cost about $1.4 million. Dust protection and adsorbent material replacement cost is roughly $30,000. Before any actions are further considered Edmonds needs to perform at least one more stack test. The incinerated solids may have changed dramatically due to plant influent changes. The estimated cost to conduct these annual tests is about $25,000. Packet Page 234 of 895 16 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 8.7.2 Secondary Bypass The Edmonds treatment plant has the ability to route peak flows around the secondary treatment units (aeration basins and secondary clarifiers). The plant has never used this bypass, and the flow projections shown in Table 8.1 predict that the future peak day flow will not exceed the plant peak day design capacity of 21.5 mgd. Therefore the current permit does not allow for bypassing and blending of secondary effluent. However, for long-range planning purposes this may be necessary in the future. The practice of bypassing peak wet weather flows around secondary treatment processes, and blending the bypass with secondary effluent, has been commonly used in the past throughout the US. In recent years this practice has become more controversial, and the EPA was asked to formalize a bypass regulation that specifically authorizes these bypasses. In December, 2005 the EPA published the provisions that allow for bypasses in the Federal Register at 40 CFR 122.41(m). The key provisions include: • Discharges must meet secondary effluent limitations, including the 85% removal requirement, or any other more stringent requirements that are necessary to meet water quality standards • All flows diverted from secondary treatment units must receive a minimum of primary treatment and any supplemental treatment or technology shown to be feasible. The policy does not authorize diversions around any other treatment units, including primary treatment units • The availability of feasible alternatives will be determined on a plant -by -plant basis, and the authority to bypass the secondary process will be incorporated into the plant's NPDES permit. • The permittee is responsible for submitting a comprehensive analysis of the feasibility of eliminating the secondary bypass • If the DOE determines that there is no feasible alternative to secondary bypass flow diversion, then they may approve secondary flow diversion 8.7.3 Total Nitrogen Discharge Limits Nitrogen is a nutrient which is believed to be one of the main causes of oxygen depletion in South Puget Sound (south of Tacoma Narrows). As a result, the Department of Ecology is conducting a TMDL Study of all of the sources of nitrogen entering Puget Sound (including the effects from discharges north of the Narrows). Ecology is adding nitrogen monitoring requirements to all permits for plants discharging to Puget Sound, in order to gather data for the study. Although not imminent, for long-range planning purposes, consideration should be given as to how Edmonds plants would meet a future total nitrogen limit. Total nitrogen (TN) removal is normally accomplished by biological nitrification and de - nitrification, just as carbonaceous BOD removal is currently accomplished in the Packet Page 235 of 895 8 17 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN aeration basins. However, the slower growing nitrifying micro-organisms require about three times the minimum detention time that is recommended for carbonaceous BOD removal. In addition anoxic (without dissolved oxygen) basins are needed to provide biological de -nitrification. De -nitrification is the conversion of nitrates to nitrogen gas through bacteria stripping the nitrates of their oxygen; the nitrogen gas then releases to the atmosphere. The total additional tankage required would be about 6 million gallons. The only space available for new aeration and anoxic basins would be to expand the plant to the parking lot across 2nd Avenue S. east of the facility; which is the facilities property. This site is not large enough to accommodate conventional activated sludge tanks Edmonds other option would be converting the plant's activated sludge process to a membrane bioreactor (MBR) system. This choice is the most logical for plants with space restraints. Whereas conventional activated sludge plants operate at a mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration of 2,000 to 4,000 mg/L, MBRs operate at a concentration of 8,000 to 12,000 mg/L. This higher concentration reduces the required aeration basin size proportionately, so the required basins would be reduced to about 2.0 million gallons, or about the volume of the existing aeration basins. In addition, with the MBR process the liquid and solids are separated by a membrane, not by gravity settling, so the need for secondary clarifiers is eliminated. This, in turn, would allow space for the required membrane basins and membrane support building. Additionally the MBR plant would have to improve the headworks screening for the MBR system. Screening requirement is 3 mm (1/8") sized openings, current bar screens have 6 mm (1/4") openings. 8.8 PLANT IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONAL NEEDS 8.8.1 Improvements since 2006 Comprehensive Plan Since the 2006 Comprehensive Plan, the City has completed or is in the process of completing the following improvements at the WWTP. 1. 2007-Electrical Improvement Project. #C-251 i. Replace the three main switch gear breakers with draw -out style breakers to allow us to service the breakers without a total plant power outage. ii. Add a 600 amp breaker to the "B" side distribution panel for a feeder to the 100 building. 2. 2007-MCC Feeder Installation. #M-009 i. Added a new MCC to the 100 building for the new screenings equipment and to move some of the load from the existing MCC Packet Page 236 of 895 18 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN due to under size cables between the existing MCC breaker and the MCC bus bars. 3. 2007-Screenings System Improvement. #C-161 i. Replaced the influent bar screens with Headworks bar screens (3). ii. Replaced the screenings pump with two Wemco pumps. iii. Modified the screenings hopper feed water to use raw sewage from the influent pumps iv. Added flow meters on the hopper make up water and the screenings transfer flow. v. Added a JWC Macho Monster grinder between the screenings conveyer and the screenings hopper. vi. Replaced the old screenings de -watering unit with a Headworks washer compactor. 4. 2009-Odor Control Improvement Project. #C-311 i. Install duct work, a VFD controlled fan, and carbon scrubber on the three Aeration Basins. ii. Install duct work, a two speed fan and a carbon scrubber on the secondary clarifier #2. iii. Enclose secondary clarifier #2 iv. Remove the ventilation louvers and the window between the incinerator room and the belt press room. v. Install two fans and duct work to bring outside air into the belt press room. vi. Install a fan and duct work to allow us to route the foul air from the Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) storage tank to the incinerator while the incinerator is running. Or route it to the chemical scrubber when the incinerator is down vii. Added duct work to route the air from the Raw Sludge storage tank through fan #FIC-654. 5. 2009-Secondary Clarifier #2 Refurbishment. #C-316 i. Strip and repaint all the steel in secondary clarifier #2. 6. 2009-Clay Feeder Project. #C-317 i. Install a platform over the Sludge Hopper in the incinerator room. ii. Install a kaolin clay feeder on the platform that will feed Kaolin clay into the sludge hopper. iii. Install a control panel for the feeder with a VFD and timers for the vibrator. iv. This system allows us to control the undesirable effects of high sodium content in the sludge. When we feed clay we can control the melting point of the ash. Packet Page 237 of 895 8-19 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 7. 2009-Aration Basin Control Up -grade. #M-050 i. Install new Dissolved Oxygen probes on all three Basins. ii. Install new Total Suspended Solids probes on all three basins. iii. Install three instrument transmitters and three radio transmitters on the basins. iv. Install a radio receiver in the CP-301 and hook it into the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). v. Program the PLC to trend the TSS of the basins. 8. 2010-Energy Efficiency Up -grade. #C-322 i. Replace the course air diffuser in the WAS storage tank with Sanitair membrane style fine bubble diffusers. ii. Replace the centrifugal aeration blower 304 with a high efficiency turbo style blower. 9. 2010-300 PLC Upgrade. #C-328 i. Replace the old Input/Output (1/0) PLC cards with new model cards. 10. 2010-Sludge Pump Replacement. #M-054 i. Replace air operated RAW Sludge Transfer pump #RST-608 with an electric driven duel diaphragm Penn Valley pump. This will save electricity usage by reducing the demand on the air compressors. 11. 2011-Lighting Up -grade. C-366 i. Replace all the florescent lighting and some outside lighting with high efficiency lighting. ii. Install motion sensors in various locations around the plant. 12. 2011-Outfall Diffuser Project. #C-367 i. Have the diffuser orifice plates removed to allow less head lose through the diffusers ii. Perform a new mixing zone analysis. 13. 2012-A Basin Up -grade. #C-365 i. Remove all the diffusers and piping grids in Aeration Basin #1. ii. Install two baffle walls to convert the complete mix basin to a plug flow basin. iii. Install Sanitair's new panel style diffusers. iv. Replace the existing single air control valve to the basin with two control valves, one on each grid section. 14. 2012-VFD Replacement. C-384 i. Replace three, obsolete Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) with new VFDs. ii. Install two new VFDs on pumps DSP-615 and BDW-401. 15. 2012-Switch Gear Access Platform. Packet Page 238 of 895 8 20 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN i. Install a platform over secondary clarifier #1 behind the plants main electrical switch gear to allow personnel access to the rear panels of the switch gear. 16. 2012-Fiber Optic Network. C-387 i. Replace the existing plant PLC and SCADA network cables with Fiber Optic cable. 17. 2012-Non-Potable Water Pump Up -grade. C-322 i. Replace one 50 HP non -potable water pump with a 30 HP pump and a VFD. ii. Install a booster pump, in the belt press room, for the high pressure applications, 18. 2012-Hypochlorite Pump Relocation. C-386 i. Relocate the sodium hypochlorite pumps from the hypo room to the caustic storage area down stairs. ii. Install an uninterruptible power supply to the power circuit for the disinfection pumps iii. Add a fourth pump for disinfection. 19. 2012-Roof Replacement. C-383 i. Replace aging roofs on buildings 100, 300, and 600. 20. 2012-Underground Storage Tank (UST) Monitoring Up -grade. i. Up -grade the level indicator on the UST to have the ability to perform statistical inventory control. This will bring us into compliance with the Department of Ecology. ii. Up -grade the leak monitoring system to a more reliable model. 8.8.2 Additional WWTP Improvements Current or future modifications at the WWTP, due to obsolescence, operator preferences, or energy upgrades include the following (refer to Table 9.5): WWTP-1 Switchgear Upgrade. The existing automatic transfer switch is corroded and failing. This improvement will insure reliable emergency power. WWTP-2 Incinerator Testing and Compliance. Install new air emissions and monitoring equipment on the existing incinerator, modify pre -heat burner fuel source from diesel to natural gas and install a secondary heat exchanger to preheat air for plume suppression. WWTP-3 Control System Upgrades. This work would begin in Building 600. Packet Page 239 of 895 8 21 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN WWTP-4 Ameresco Energy Project. Replace the water feature pump and install a VFD. Install thermostat and controls on Shop heater. Evaluate replacement of Sludge Pump. WWTP-5 Facility Improvements. This would include upgrades and expansion of the facilities, including the Men's Locker room. WWTP-6 Variable Frequency Drive Upgrade. Replaces three old drives and installs two new drives WWTP-7 Upgrade Flow Telemetry Equipment to improve data retrieval accuracy. WWTP-8 Secondary Clarifier #3 Steel Coating, Weir washer and concrete coating and repair. WWTP-9 Secondary Clarifier #1 Steel Coating, Weir washer and concrete coating and repair. WWTP-10 Chlorine Contact Chamber Inspection and Coating. WWTP-11 Diesel Day Tank. Obsolete day tank. WWTP-12 Polymer Make up Equipment. Equipment has past its useful life. WWTP-13 Unanticipated Plant and Operational Improvements and Repairs. WWTP-14 Screenings Improvements. Evaluate options for better handling of screening materials. WWTP-15 Belt Filter Press Energy Project. Evaluate the best solids handling options to maximize solids capture and cake. WWTP-16 Convert 200 HP Blower to Turbo Blower. Energy saving measure. WWTP-17 Upgrade Heat Pumps in Building 700. Energy saving measure WWTP-18 Upgrade the Control Valve Actuators on the Effluent Pumps. WWTP-19 Automatic Flow Shearing Process. Energy Saving measure. WWTP-20 Recoat Primary Clarifier #1 Steel Equipment and Concrete Repair. WWTP-21 Chemical Use Area. Improve access to eyewash and maneuverability. Packet Page 240 of 895 8 22 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN CHAPTER IX — COMPREHENESIVE PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 9.1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS RANKING Three major components make up the Capital Improvements Program (CIP), 1) those reoccurring maintenance issues, 2) that infrastructure that has known deficiencies or integrity issues and 3) that infrastructure that needs to be upsized resulting from population growth and the associated increase in flow values. Together these three components comprise the CIP. The City has an extensive and detailed categorization of the entire system. Each fault/problem was assigned a point value which reflects the City staff's assessment and judgment. The City has three main categories of deficiencies: a) the Red Area, which are chronic O&M issues that require the frequent and repeated attention of the City O&M Staff. The City has identified line segments that require regular flushing. This flushing schedule prioritizes the severity of the condition by the frequency of flushing. The location of these segments is presented in Appendix F.1 and also included in the I&I Study. Reportedly some problem segments have been removed from the trouble list due to actions implemented by the maintenance staff. The source of many of these problems stem from either low flow or grease accumulations. In the latter case, most of the property owners have been notified of pre-treatment requirements and the City's Fats, Oils and Grease policy. b) the Granite system. Areas of know deficiencies have been identified through the City's Granite Software. This is a very comprehensive listing of known problems. These problems are categorized using approximately 28 descriptors. These descriptors have been aggregated into issues that are O&M in nature and which generally are individually minor, but collectively may warrant a CIP. The second Granite category are those CIP that could be rectified using trenchless technologies and the last category are those issues that likely would require major construction including digging up and replacement of the line segment. c) Capacity Issues. With forecasted population and development, the anticipated future flows were applied to the existing piping infrastructure to determine which pipes are currently or, in the future, will be over capacity and surcharging the system. A comprehensive listing of the Capital Improvement Projects considered all three of these factors. Isolated reports of minor faults or problems generally do not warrant a CIP. However, when several reoccurring maintenance issues are found in a single pipe reach, that segment might become a candidate for replacement or repair. Consequently, all faults/problems have been listed by pipe reach to aggregate the 9-1 Packet Page 241 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN problem areas. The detailed presentation of the individual problems is listed in Appendix F (Tables F.1 — Red Areas; Table F.2 — Granite O&M segments; Table F.3 — Granite Known Deficiencies -Trench less; Table FA — Granite Known Deficiencies -Dig up and Replace). The assignment of points is summarized in Table 9 TABLE 9.1 Point Assignment for Capital Improvement Projects Category Red Areas Granite - O&M Granite - Trenchless Granite - Dig up and Replace Capacity Grease 5 Dirt, Grease, Grit 5 Girt 5 Black Water 5 None 0 Grit, Black Water 5 Grit (a lot) 6 N/A 0 Clean Flume 1 Brush Sensor 1 Depressions in Pipe 4 Problem Laterals - Abandoned 6 Debris and Deposits 0 Grease - Medium 0 Problem Laterals - Connections 5 Medium Root Problems 2 Light Root Problems 1 Roots 1 Joint Gasket Exposed - Severe 2 Problem Joint - Offset Medium 2 Joint Separation - Medium 2 Joint Separation - Small 1 Joint Separation 1 Crack 5 Heavy Root Problem 3 Hole in Pipe - Medium 9 Hole in Pipe - Small 8 Hole in Pie 8 Joint Separated - Large 3 Infiltration in Joint 5 Deformed 7 Broken 4 Broken Hole 4 Pipe Repair 10 Hole in Pipe - Large 10 Joint Offset - Large 3 Capacity - Model 10 Known Surcharging Pipe Segments 20 9-2 Packet Page 242 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN These point assignments were made to each fault/problem and then summed by pipe segment. Ranking of the most severe segments were done both including and excluding the `Granite -O&M' problems. Both rankings are listed in Appendix F (Table F.6 — All categories and Table F.7 — without Granite O&M). The pipe segment ranking presented in Table 9.2 represents the ranking without the `Granite -O&M' components. This table identifies only the top ranked projects that are expected to be funded in the 6- year funding window. The ranking of all projects is presented in Table F.7. It was felt that this ranking best reflects the problems that can be resolved by a CIP project. The exclusion of the `Granite -O&M' problems were viewed to be reoccurring maintenance issues such as flushing and root cutting and were viewed as maintenance issues that are not easily solved with a CIP. Those areas will require continued vigilance and follow up to intercept fats, oils and grease before they enter the City's system. Those problems noted to have `low flow' are typically associated with new developments that have not completely built out. With time, these problems may resolve themselves without a CIP. In addition, there were other Granite descriptors that were entries which were unassociated with any deficiency. These codings included camera out of water, cleanout, continue against flow, continue with flow, continue TV after jetting, end of pipe, end of push camera, end of run, infiltration, inside drop, lateral, outside drop, pipe continue, pipe diameter change, pipe direction change, pipe type, start against flow, start with flow, status, stop, and TV from other end. 9.2 CAPACITY LIMITATIONS IN EXISTING LINES Based on the future estimated population growth presented in Chapter 6 and the flow projections and modeling results found in Chapter 7, certain deficiencies were anticipated in the collection and conveyance system. The population projections and corresponding flow projections were based on four time periods: 2013 (current), 2019, 2033 and build out. The CIP is presented in three time periods: 2013 to 2019, 2019 to 2033 and lastly 2033 to build out. The identification of the capacity issues for each of these three periods is presented in Table F.5 (Appendix F). The line capacity issues together with the other known and scheduled projects and are ranked on Table 9.2 and presented on Figure 9.1. These ranked projects total $10,244,475 to be spread over the five years between 2015 and 2019 or about $2,000,000 per year. From this pool of projects the City can prioritize, select and coordinate with other City projects. In addition to these identified projects, Table F.7 (Appendix F) has a long list of other projects, with lower rankings, from which the City could choose. The more distant CIPs, such as those shown for 2019 to 2033 and 2033 to build out, are based on extended population and flow forecasts and will tend to be less precise. None -the -less, they are presented for informational purposes and as an indicator of future potential capacity issues while providing the level of service in Chapter 4. 9-3 Packet Page 243 of 895 Table 9.2 Ranking and Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Without Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment Granite Cost Estimate (see O&M Appendix E) 0 CIP Letter Segment and Ranking Number Reason Manhole # Distance of Run Comments Table Red Area Granite - Trenchles s Granite - Dig up and Replace Observed Surcharged Conditions TOTAL Coll -1 Multiple Defects 8-75-8-57 144 0 38 0 0 38 Coll -2 Multiple Defects 8-50-8-52 213 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 15 8 10 33 34 A Coll -68 Multiple Defects 8-59-8-58 148 0 10 0 0 10 5 $ 309,842 Coll -43 Multiple Defects 8-51-8-50 150 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 5 0 10 15 4 Coll -3 Multiple Defects 8-58-8-57 657 0 30 0 0 30 176 Coll -4 Multiple Defects 17-61-17-84 484 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 28 Coll -6 Multiple Defects 17-47-17-48 500 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 4 Coll -7 Multiple Defects 17-48-17-59 506 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 4 Coll -8 Multiple Defects 17-60-17-61 179 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 4 B Coll -9 Multiple Defects 17-84-17-85 457 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 4 Coll -10 Multiple Defects 17-85-17-86 111 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 4 $ 2,113,193 Coll -11 Multiple Defects 17-86-17-87 43 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 4 Coll -12 Multiple Defects 17-87-17-88 35 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 4 Coll -15 Capacity - Model 17-59-17-60 463 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -45 Multiple Defects 17-78-17-82 266 Longitudinal - Wider (8• - 12'° F.2 and F.5 0 5 0 10 15 0 Coll -70 Multiple Defects 17-88-17-89 19 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 4 Coll -5 Multiple Defects 8-265-8-266 438 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 6 Coll -14 Multiple Defects 8-244-8-243 305 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 3 Coll -20 Multiple Defects 8-249-8-265 98 0 3 0 0 20 23 1 Coll -23 Roots 8-246-8-247 180 F.1 0 0 0 0 20 20 1 C Coll -27 Multiple Defects 8-243-8-242 305 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 10 0 10 20 0 $ 736,038 Coll -30 Observed Surcharge 8-242-8-245 78 20 20 Coll -31 Observed Surcharge 8-245-8-246 173 20 20 Coll -32 Observed Surcharge 8-247-8-248 71 20 20 Coll -33 Observed Surcharge 8-248-8-249 147 20 20 Coll -13 Multiple Defects 9-224-9-202 591 Increase 8" to 15" F.5 10 10 0 10 30 4 Coll -62 Multiple Defects 9-20-9-19 268 Increase 10" to 15" 0 0 0 10 10 8 D Coll -75 Multiple Defects 9-19-9-18 50 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 4 $ 547,117 Coll -76 Multiple Defects 9-201-9-202 280 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 4 Coll -77 Multiple Defects 9-202-9-20 299 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 4 E Coll -16 Multiple Defects 12-75-8-14 349 0 0 28 0 28 0 $ 355,687 Coll -25 Multiple Defects 12-73-12-75 247 Increase 8 to 12" F.3 and F.5 0 0 10 10 20 0 F Coll -17 Multiple Defects 11-8-11-7 207 0 26 0 0 26 12 $ 44,693 G Coll -18 Multiple Defects 12-143-12-142 475 0 25 0 0 25 5 $ 104,450 H Coll -19 Multiple Defects 13-53-9-212 325 0 25 0 0 25 4 $ 43,802 1 Coll -21 Multiple Defects 12-109-12-110 319 0 20 0 0 20 5 $ 29,193 J Coll -22 Multiple Defects 8-332-8-331 144 0 20 0 0 20 5 $ 23,531 K Coll -24 Multiple Defects 16-128-16-129 252 Increase 24" to 36" F.3 0 0 10 10 20 0 $ 620,525 Coll -26 Multiple Defects 16-133-16-134 379 Increase 24" to 36" F.3 and F.5 0 0 10 10 20 0 Coll -28 Multiple Defects 8-280-8-281 371 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 0 10 0 10 20 0 L Coll -42 Multiple Defects 8-285-8-284 319 0 15 0 0 15 5 $ 506,839 Coll -44 Multiple Defects 8-281-8-282 281 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 0 5 0 10 15 1 M Coll -29 Multiple Defects 1-55-1-52 297 0 0 20 0 20 0 $ 149,270 N Coll -34 Multiple Defects 12-84A-12-83 189 0 5 14 0 19 10 $ 92,363 O Coll -35 Multiple Defects 12-101-12-95 406 0 5 14 0 19 2 $ 206,654 P Coll -36 Multiple Defects 12-49-12-50 220 0 8 10 0 18 0 $ 122,160 Q Coll -37 Multiple Defects 13-22-13-22A 247 0 18 0 0 18 0 $ 37,898 R Coll -38 Multiple Defects 8-6813-8-68 217 0 17 0 0 17 2 $ 48,491 S Coll -39 Multiple Defects 12N-79-13-65B 109 0 3 14 0 17 0 $ 63,942 T Coll -40 Multiple Defects 8-107-8-106 201 0 10 6 0 16 6 $ 115,289 Packet Page 244 of 895 Table 9.2 Ranking and Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Without Granite 08M Only Ranking and Point Assignment CIP Letter Segment and Ranking Number Reason Manhole # Distance of Run Comments Table Red Area Granite - Trenchles s Granite - Dig up and Replace F. Observed Surcharged Conditions TOTAL U Coll -41 Multiple Defects 7-79-7-80 419 0 15 0 0 15 V Coll -46 Multiple Defects 12-126-12-125 443 0 15 0 0 15 W Coll -47 Multiple Defects 7-9-7-10 304 0 14 0 14 -48 Multiple Defects 12-134-12-132 159 0 14 0 0 14 X -CColl Coll -49 Multiple Defects 12-132-12-131 129 0 14 0 0 14 Coll -57 Multiple Defects 12-133-12-134 197 0 0 10 0 10 Y Coll -50 Multiple Defects 9-299-9-298 145 0 3 10 0 13 Coll -51 Multiple Defects 14-56-14-62 406 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 0 3 0 10 13 Z Coll -58 Multiple Defects 14-66-14-65 348 0 10 0 0 10 Coll -80 Multiple Defects 14-65-14-64 175 0 0 10 0 10 AA Coll -52 Multiple Defects 12-248-12-247 128 0 13 0 0 13 BB Coll -53 Multiple Defects 8-136-8-137 401 0 12 0 0 12 Coll -61 Multiple Defects 8-135-8-316 96 5 5 0 0 10 CC Coll -54 Multiple Defects 9-363A-9-363 318 0 12 0 0 12 DID Coll -55 Multiple Defects 14-3-14-3A 105 0 9 3 0 12 EE Coll -56 Multiple Defects 2-113A-2-113 336 0 11 0 0 11 FF Coll -59 Multiple Defects 14-34-14-33 328 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 GG Coll -60 Multiple Defects 8-4-8-5 262 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 HH Coll -63 Multiple Defects 9-11-9-10 268 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 II Coll -64 Multiple Defects 8-35-8-36 287 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -73 Multiple Defects 8-34-8-35 334 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 JJ Coll -65 Multiple Defects 1-36A-1-36 214 0 0 10 0 10 KK Coll -66 Multiple Defects 8-114-8-113 269 0 0 10 0 10 LL Coll -67 Multiple Defects 8-240-8-239 336 0 10 0 0 10 MM Coll -69 Multiple Defects 14-48-14-50 130 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 -71 Multiple Defects 7-47-7-50 187 Increase 12" to 18" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 NN -CColl Coll -72 Multiple Defects 7-48-7-47 166 Increase 12" to 18" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -81 Multiple Defects 7-50-7-52 159 0 10 0 0 10 00 Coll -74 Multiple Defects 9-193-9-196 128 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 PP Coll -78 Multiple Defects 4-163-4-162 295 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 QQ Coll -79 Multiple Defects 9-188-9-189 174 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 RR Coll -82 Multiple Defects 8-41-8-42 332 Increase 8" to 15" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 SS Coll -83 Multiple Defects 8-2-8-2A 197 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -84 Multiple Defects 8-2A-8-3 134 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 TT Coll -85 Multiple Defects 11-19-11-18 526 Increase from 24 to 42 F.5 0 0 0 10 10 UU Coll -86 Multiple Defects 3-12F-3-12E 116 0 0 10 0 10 VV Coll -87 Multiple Defects 8-97-8-98 186 0 10 0 0 10 W W Coll -88 Multiple Defects 4-83-4-82 150 Increase 10" to 12" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 XX Coll -89 Multiple Defects 7-33-7-32 441 Increase 30" to 42" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 TOTAL Granite O&M 30 0 15 2 0 16 6 2 16 4 0 14 9 8 0 1 13 12 6 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 Cost Estimate (see Appendix E) $ 158,717 $ 170,957 $ 115,879 $ 127,173 $ 39,790 $ 189,931 $ 23,239 $ 48,578 $ 38,492 $ 27,890 $ 52,922 $ 108,920 $ 154,225 $ 160,101 $ 290,138 $ 109,761 $ 137,041 $ 43,021 $ 114,781 $ 330,952 $ 38,164 $ 109,250 $ 53,872 $ 222,590 $ 190,375 $ 362,003 $ 56,142 $ 20,920 $ 49,610 $ 428,064 $ 10,244,475 Packet Page 245 of 895 LS #12— ��r� S Legend ss CIP Letter CIP with Ranking 84 Sewer Lines 0 Edmonds WWTP 0 Lynnwood WWTP 0 Lift Station ■ ■ j City of Edmonds Boundary i i_ Service Boundary Puget Sound Edmonds Zone Meter LS-1 Meter B MLT Zone Meter C - Zone 1 Meter E - Zone 2 Richmond Beach Zone Meter 1 �//% Lynnwood Zone Note 1. Potential new sewer alignment for segment 42. L T e ee 27 123 LS #$ 33o M 5 53 61 87 o LS #2 w % o L Note 1 J ,♦♦ LS #1 ,♦, LS`#8 ••`�♦ ,,, Puget Sound ` — 1♦ LS 0 51 Mete 1 O Q U LS #5 monds WWTP LS #6 LS #7 Meter A Meter E O 0 MM 59 I .7 T -111 ■Z-7,60 MILT Zone 0 9 10 �I F 0 ■C o I= I/ U 0 r_ ■ ■U cn o ,=■Y ■�■■ O■ ■ Richmond Beach Zone 4^♦♦ 71 G Capacity Limited Pipes: Aqualyze Inc., June 2013 pF EDn jO p4� A"3, BHC Consultants, LLC Sewer Zones: City of Edmonds, December 2011 NORTH COMPOSITE C I P 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 GIS Data: City of Edmonds, Snohomish County & King County. - Seattle, Washington 98101 Data sources supplied may not reflect current or COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Figure actual conditions. This map is a geographic 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 ` 206.505.3400 representation based on information available. C O N S U LTA N S 206.505.3406 (fax) It does not represent survey data. No warranty Feet City of Edmonds 9.1 www.bhcoonsultants.com is made concerning the accuracy, currency, Scale in Feet July 2013 COPYRIGHT© 90}q hA�j ATA41�f,f{y11CRIGHTS RESERVED or completeness of data depicted on this map. Inc 1890 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 9.3 BASIS FOR CIP COSTS ESTIMATES Construction cost estimates were prepared for most of the CIP projects listed in Table 9.3. Documentation for these estimates can be found in Appendix E. Those projects that do not have supporting cost estimates are based on actual bid amounts or detailed cost estimating done during the design phases. Certain assumption needed to be made in terms of quantities and unit prices. Those assumptions are presented below. Several unit price items were used to determine the cost estimates. Quantities were estimated for each item and unit prices were estimated from recent bid results. An estimated construction cost was developed for each project including contingencies and sales tax. Total project costs were then estimated for each improvement. All costs are 2013 dollars and summarized on Table 9.3. CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES -ASSUMPTIONS • 10% of the construction costs are Mobilization. • Traffic control at $5/LF of mainline sewer. • Trench dewatering estimated at $5/LF. • Sheeting, shoring and bracing estimated at $5/LF. • Saw cutting along both sides of the trench estimated to be required for the entire length of the mainline sewer. • Pavement removal is limited to a trench width of 60 inches, plus an allowance of 12 inches on both sides of the trench, for a total width of 84 inches. • Temporary sewer bypass estimated to be $5/LF for all cut and cover installations. • Import trench backfill is estimated based on the assumption that 50% of all excavation will require imported material. Maximum width is 60 inches and an average depth of 8 feet. • Crushed surfacing, base course is assumed to be 8 inches deep and a maximum pay width of 84 inches. 9-7 Packet Page 247 of 895 TABLE 9.3 Capital Improvements Projects Sub - Basin Description CIP No. 2013 - 2019 (2013 Dollars) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2012 - 2019 Total Collection System (See Appendix E for Cost Estimates) 2012 Sewer Replacement / Rehab Improvements $350,000 $849,029 $1,199,029 2013 Sewer Replacement / Rehab Improvements $120,000 $1,807,767 $1,927,767 2014 Sewer Replacement / Rehab Improvements $191,262 $191,262 City-wide Sewer Improvements $33,981 $33,981 City-wide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation $302,600 $436,893 $739,493 Meter Installation Basin LS-01 $72,600 $72,600 Meter Installations Basin Edmonds Zone $19,417 $19,417 Smoke Test in Basin LS-01 $75,000 $75,000 Comprehensive Sewer Plan $99,100 $99,100 2015 Sewer Replacement / Rehab Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2016 Sewer Replacement / Rehab Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2017 Sewer Replacement / Rehab Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2018 Sewer Replacement / Rehab Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2019 Sewer Replacement / Rehab Improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Collection System Subtotal $1,019,300 $3,338,349 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $14,357,649 PUMP STATIONS Pump Station Rehabilitation (PS #3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15) $4,822,810 $4,822,810 Pump Station Subtotal $4,822,810 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,822,810 Edmond WWTP Switchgear Upgrade WWTP-1 $1,297,724 $1,297,724 Incinerator Testing and Compliance WWTP-2 $100,000 $90,000 $850,000 $1,040,000 Control System Upgrades WWTP-3 $67,469 $250,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000 $637,469 Ameresco Energy Project WWTP-4 $15,000 $15,000 Facility Improvement WWTP-5 $350,000 $350,000 Variable Frequency Drive upgrade WWTP-6 $25,000 $25,000 Upgrade Flow Telemetry Equipment WWTP-7 $15,000 $10,000 $25,000 Secondary Clarifier #3 Steel Coating, weir washer, concrete WWTP-8 $175,000 $175,000 Secondary Clarifier #1 Steel Coating, weir washer, concrete WWTP-9 $125,000 $125,000 Chlorine Contact Chamber Inspection and Coating WWTP-10 $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 Diesel Day Tank WWTP-11 $6,000 $6,000 Polymer Make Up Equipment WWTP-12 $80,000 $80,000 Unanticipated Plant and Operational Improvements/Repairs WWTP-13 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $425,000 $750,000 $750,000 $2,075,000 Screenings Improvements WWTP-14 $20,000 $100,000 $120,000 Belt Filter Press Energy Project WWTP-15 $50,000 $20,000 $500,000 $570,000 Packet Page 248 of 895 TABLE 9.3 Capital Improvements Projects Sub - Basin Description 4 CIP No. 2013 - 2019 (2013 Dollars) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2012 - 2019 Total Convert 200 HP blower to Turbo Blower WWTP-16 $350,000 $350,000 Upgrade Heat Pumps in Building 700 WWTP-17 $50,000 $50,000 Ugrade Control Valve Actuators on Effluent Pumps WWTP-18 $35,000 $35,000 Automatic Flow Shearing Process WWTP-19 $35,000 $35,000 Recoat Primary Clarifier #1 Steel Equipment/Concrete Repair WWTP-20 $100,000 $100,000 Chemical Use Area WWTP-21 $125,000 $125,000 Unspent Funds from 2012 $40,511 $40,511 Subtotal EDMONDS WWTP $1,910,704 $981,000 $1,000,000 $1,005,000 $975,000 $930,000 $975,000 $7,776,704 TOTAL COST mFm $7,752,814 $4,319,349 $3,000,000 $3,005,000 $2,975,000 $2,930,000 $2,975,000 $26,957,163 Packet Page 249 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN • Crushed surfacing, top course is assumed to be 4 inches deep and a maximum pay width of 84 inches. • HMA is based on a maximum thickness of 3 inches applied over a width of 20 feet (1/2 road) for the entire length of all mainline sewers. • Restoration is based on 5% of the construction subtotal. • Cleanup and testing is based on 5% of the construction subtotal. • Manholes - It is assumed that the terminal manholes will be salvaged and only the intermediate manholes will be replaced or modified. • Lift station rehabilitation assumes that no excavation will be necessary and that the needed increase in the capacity can be accomplished with pump and motor changes, and electrical revisions. ALLIED AND OTHER COSTS — ASSUMPTIONS • 40% contingency to address pre -design level of cost estimating. • 9.0% State Sales Tax. • 12% of the estimated construction cost is for engineering design, survey, geotechnical investigation and permits. • 7% of the estimated construction cost is for construction services. • 2% of the estimated construction cost is for District Administration. • 1 % of the estimated construction cost is for legal. 9.4 WASTEWATER REUSE RCW 90.48.112 requires consideration of reclaimed water in wastewater plans. Although the law does not specifically require implementation of a reclaimed water alternative, it strongly encourages it. RCW 90.46.005 states in part that to the extent that reclaimed water is appropriate for beneficial uses, it should be so used to preserve potable water for drinking purposes. 9.4.1 Regulatory Requirements 9-10 Packet Page 250 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Beneficial use of reclaimed water for irrigation of crops, supplemental stream or wetland flow enhancement, groundwater recharge, toilet and urinal flushing, etc. requires treatment to reclamation and reuse standards, which are more stringent than the conventional secondary standards required for surface water disposal using an outfall. The added treatment facilities required include effluent coagulation, filtration, additional disinfection and more treatment facility redundancy and reliability requirements. The use of reclaimed water is permitted in the State of Washington, and is jointly regulated by the State Departments of Health (Division of Drinking Water); and Department of Ecology. The "State of Washington Reclamation and Reuse Standards", September, 1997 (Publication #97-23) provides the guidance for acceptable reclaimed water treatment and use. Under all reuse options, the proposal must demonstrate the beneficial uses being made of the reclaimed water. Membrane Bio-reactors (MBRs) are not specifically mentioned in this publication, though it has generally and widely been adopted as an acceptable treatment process meeting reuse standards. The State Reclamation Standards define four levels of treatment required depending on the final use of the reclaimed water. Class A reclaimed water is the highest quality and can be utilized for any of the permitted uses. In addition to conventional secondary activated sludge treatment (oxidation and sedimentation), Class A reclaimed water requires coagulation, filtration, and disinfection to less than 2.2 total coliform per 100 ml, which is a very stringent disinfection standard. The MBR treatment process (with disinfection) will also produce Class A reclaimed water (with added disinfection), because the coagulation occurs within the activated sludge process itself and filtration is provided through the fine pore membranes. Classes B, C, and D reclaimed water do not require filtration, and Class C and D have less stringent disinfection requirements. Use of these classes is generally restricted to irrigation of non-food crops (such as forest land) with restricted public exposure. Because the most logical uses of this reclaimed water involve irrigation of golf courses and public parks, which are subject to human exposure, treatment to Class A reclaimed water standards is recommended. In addition, the reclaimed water must be reliably generated. Emergency storage or alternative discharge options must be provided for upset conditions. Excess flow will continue to be discharged to Puget Sound. The standards also require automatic alarms, treatment unit redundancy, and qualified operations staffing. 9.4.2 Potential Uses and Demand While reuse of reclaimed wastewater treatment plant effluent is becoming more and more common, the demand for year-round reclaimed effluent in the Pacific Northwest is very limited, particularly in a suburban setting. Nevertheless, the City has made 9-11 Packet Page 251 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN accommodations for use of reclaimed water at the WWTP. In assessing the potential use of Class A reclaimed water, sites were identified for irrigation and/or industrial, commercial and public use. Irrigation can include parks, commercial nurseries, golf courses, and cemeteries. Industrial uses of reclaimed water can include boiler feed, cooling, process water, sewer flushing, and processing plant wash down. There were no industrial sites identified in the City's service area. Thus, the main uses of reclaimed water from the WWTP would be irrigation of open access areas. This analysis looked at the top 25 water consumers in the City. Their water usage for the winter months of November through February was compared to the annual average water usage. If these top water users had significant irrigational uses, the difference would be evident when comparing these values. Oddly, only a handful of users exhibited increased irrigational demands of the City's domestic water supply. The most significant users were Swedish Hospital, the City of Lynnwood and 99 Ranch Market. These users actually reported either no increase in irrigational needs or a reduction in summertime uses. Consequently the volume of irrigational demands within a three mile radius of the plant is relatively small as presented in Table 9.4. TABLE 9.4 Wastewater Reuse Demand Average Average Average Non- Average Average Estimated Annual Winter (Nov Winter usage Monthly Monthly Irrigational User Water thru Feb) (Mar - Oct), Winter Non -Winter Monthly Consumption Water Usage, 2007 - Water Water Demand 2007 -2011 2007 - 2011 (CCF) ) Usage Usage (CCF) (CCF) (CCF) (CCF) (CCF) Highland Park Condominiums 4,782 1,253 3,529 313 441 128 Tops Foods 7,459 1,945 5,514 486 689 203 Edmonds School 1 5,491 1,450 4,041 363 505 143 Park Ballinger 41557 1,495 3,062 374 383 9 Apartments TOTAL 483 Note 1. The Edmonds School values are likely skewed since the schools are largely unused during the summer months 9.4.3 Reclaimed Water Treatment Facilities at WWTP Effluent Quality The effluent produced by the City's WWTP would likely require an effluent filter added to the last stage of a secondary treatment process to meet the Class C reclaimed water standard. This system could potentially be designed within the space constraints at the WWTP. It is assumed that the reclaimed water will be pumped to off -site irrigation users, and that no on -site storage will be provided. 9-12 Packet Page 252 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 9.4.4 Reclaimed Water Conveyance and Distribution Conveyance Alternatives Conveyance of reclaimed water by pumping is the only logical and practical conveyance method. Truck hauling could be considered for other general uses, such as sewer flushing, street washing, dust control, roadside planter watering, etc. But this expected volume of usage is likely to be very small. Conveyance and Distribution Facilities The conveyance of reclaimed water from the WWTP would require a pump station and 27,200 feet of 4" diameter force main. 9.4.5 Economic Analysis of Reuse A present worth factor of 12.46 based on 5% interest rate and 20-year project life is used for economic analysis. Estimated Capital Cost of Treatment and Conveyance Site work $100,000 Reclaimed water booster station 400,000 Conveyance 900,000 Distribution 350,000 Subtotal $1,750,000 Contingencies (@- 40% 700,000 Subtotal $2,450,000 State Sales Tax (@ - 9.0% 220,000 Total Construction $2,670,000 Engineering @ 12% $320,000 Construction Management @ 7% 190,000 City Administration @ 2% 53,000 Legal (@)- 1 % 27,000 Total Capital $3,260,000 Amortized Annual Capital Cost $262,000 Estimated Annual O&M Cost of Treatment and Conveyance Treatment & Conveyance Chemicals $6,000 Electricity 1,000 Equipment maintenance and replacement 12,000 Labor 40,000 Total Annual O&M Cost $59,000 9-13 Packet Page 253 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Total Annual Cost $321,000 Based on an average monthly usage of 483 CCF or a total of about 2,898 CCF during a six month period during the year. At $2.30/ccf, the annual of cost of water is only $6,700. The cost of conveying reclaimed water for irrigational uses does not financially make sense. 9-14 Packet Page 254 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN CHAPTER X — OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM 10.1 CITY MANAGEMENT AND PERSONNEL The City's Public Works & Utilities Department is composed of approximately 75 full time positions that are organized into seven distinct divisions. The division heads report to the Public Works Director who is responsible for the overall management of the Department. 10.1.1 Organization Two divisions of the Public Works & Utilities Department have specific functions that are vital to the inner workings and function of the wastewater utility. These divisions work independently, yet cooperatively, in a symbiotic relationship with one another. The City's sewer collection system is under the general management of Jim Waite. The City's wastewater treatment plant is under the general management of Pamela Randolph. Additional employees of the Public Works & Utilities Department within the Engineering Division and Administration Division which provide tertiary support to the Sewer Section of the Water/Sewer Division and Wastewater Treatment Plant Division are not accounted for in the above employment numbers. 10.1.2 Certification and Training The City encourages its employees to obtain certification and training for skills relevant to operating and maintaining the sewer system. All staff must, at a minimum, have the following: • A high school diploma or GED. A driver's license. In addition, the City provides employees with opportunities for training and certification relative to their position function. Each staff member annually receives some training. Depending on the employee's function, training may include safety, confined space entry, record keeping, pump station electrical and instrumentation, pump station operation, public relations, vactor truck operations and emergency response. Training is provided in varying mixes of the following categories: • Manufacturer training by various equipment suppliers and representatives. • On-the-job training in the field, the shop, or in the office. • In-house class room training. 1 0-1 Packet Page 255 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN • Industry -wide training at conferences and seminars away from the City. To promote the improvement of its employees, the City may elect to pay for annual certification fees, employee time and tuition during certification training courses and provides time off for certification testing. The City also provides staff opportunities to receive the continuing education necessary to maintain certification. Professional growth requirements for certification are met through continuing education units (CEU). 10.2 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS This section presents the operations and maintenance activities, including preventive and corrective routines, procedures and wastewater related programs. 10.2.1 Collection System Maintenance 10.2.1.1 Lift Stations The City has a two -person crew that is dedicated to lift station maintenance and incident response. This crew visits every lift station a minimum of once per week. Those stations that are older or that have a tendency to be a source of problems are visited more frequently. The emergency generators are exercised a minimum of once per month. That frequency increases to twice per month during the winter months. Typically the generators are exercised for a 1 to 2 hour period. Approximately half of the wet wells are washed down every month. These wet wells are those that have a high incident of grease accumulation. The remaining wet wells are washed down on a bi-monthly frequency. 10.2.1.2 Sanitary Sewers The City's staff has established a plan to conduct regular internal inspection (closed circuit televising) of 680,000 linear feet of pipeline. The established schedule is to complete about 33% each year. The digital records of these inspections are reviewed by the technicians and any segment that is identified as needing repair, sliplining or replacement is noted. Similarly, those segments that are structurally sound, but in need of routine attention are also tracked and, if warranted, added to the `frequent flushing' list. Those lines that have deficiencies are logged and tracked on Granite, the City's O&M tracking software. The lines that have been previously identified as needing routine maintenance and flushing are identified in Appendix F. The staff is also alert to the potential of odor concerns, though odor complaints in the collection system are extremely rare. 10-2 Packet Page 256 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The crews will also hydraulically jet the lines at the time of internal inspections if needed. Additionally, there are designated areas that are chronic maintenance problems that are more frequently cleaned. In some cases, the cleaning is conducted as often as every three months. 10.2.2 WWTP Operations and Maintenance The program maintenance protocol currently being used at the WWTPs consists of a system that tracks historical preventative maintenance measures for each piece of equipment. This system is the backbone of scheduling all preventative maintenance. All routine preventative maintenance like oil changes, lubrication and exercising of infrequently used equipment and corrective maintenance performed are chronicled on this record. The plant staff does most of the repairs and rebuilds with in-house personnel. More complex tasks such as motor rewinding, electrical or instrumentation modifications are out sourced to a third party. Critical equipment that could affect effluent quality has redundant and backup equipment `on -the -shelf'. This redundancy allows the City to respond to equipment failures without effluent violations. With the backup equipment available the City currently does not routinely replace old equipment until such time as the maintenance efforts become burdensome and replacement is the prudent decision. 10.3 PROGRAMS 10.3.1 Pretreatment Program The City, through Ordinance No. 3401, established pretreatment requirements for all non-residential dischargers into the City's system (see Appendix H). These standards include a general prohibition that disallows any discharge that would result in a pass through or interference with the Public Owned Treatment Works. The intent of this ordinance is to: 1. Prevent the introduction of pollutants into the POTW which will pass through the POTW inadequately treated, into the receiving waters or otherwise be incompatible with the POTW 2. Ensure that the quality of the POTW sludge is maintained at a level which allows its use and disposal in compliance with the applicable statues and regulations. 3. Protect the POTW personnel who may be affected by wastewater and sludge in the course of their employment and to protect the general public 4. Improve the opportunity to recycle and reclaim wastewater and biosolids from the POTW 5. Promote strategies that reduce the amounts of pollution generated by users, thereby reducing the associated hazards to the POTW and receiving waters. 10-3 Packet Page 257 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN This policy also contains a specific and detailed description of the prohibited substances. The following is a general summary of some, but not all, of those specific prohibitions: • Any substance that is considered explosive and/or has a flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit. • Any substance that may cause an obstruction to the flow in a sewer or at the plant. This includes garbage with particles greater than one -quarter inch (1/4"), waste from industrial processes including sludges, screenings, and pretreatment residues, animal guts or tissues, paunch manure, bones, hair, hides or fleshings, entrails, whole blood, feathers, ashes, cinders, sand, earth, gravel, coal, rubbish, spent lime stone or marble dust, metal, glass, straw, shavings, grass clippings, rags, spent grains, spent hops, waste paper, wood, plastics, gas, tar, asphalt residues, residues from refining, or processing of fuel or lubrication oil, mud, or glass grinding or polishing wastes. • Any wastewater generally having a pH less than 5.0 or greater than 11.0 • Any wastewater containing petroleum oil, non-biodegradeable cutting oil or product or mineral oil origin • Any noxious or malodorous substance • Any substance that may result in toxic gases, vapors or fumes. • Medical wastes • Trucked or hauled pollutants (including Septage) • Any sludges, screenings or other residues from pre-treatment wastes • Substances that might result in biosolids to be unsuitable for reclamation • Substances containing color such as stains, dyes, and paints • Wastewater that is greater than 104 degrees Fahrenheit. • Any amount of unpolluted water including non -contact cooling water, stormwater, and other indirect inflow sources. • Wastewater causing effluent toxicity in an analytical test • Wastewater containing radioactive wastes. • Detergents and other substances that may cause foaming • Any substance that may cause fire or explosion • Any substance that would result in a violation of the City's NPDES permit. • Any substance that may harm the sewer system or treatment equipment • Any hazardous or dangerous waste as defined by WAC 173-303 • Persistent pesticides • Slug loadings • Fats, Oils and Greases interfering with the operation of the plant • Metal concentrations must not exceed o Arsenic 0.36 mg/I o Cadmium 0.27 mg/I o Chromium 1.99 mg/I o Copper 2.98mg/I o Cyanide 0.29 mg/I o Lead 1.09 mg/I o Mercury 0.07 mg/I 10-4 Packet Page 258 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN o Nickel 2.14 mg/I o Silver 1.44 mg/I o Zinc 5.13 mg/I o Non -polar FOGs 100 mg/I • High strength dischargers of BOD, TSS and FOG are obligated to have special provisions that might restrict their rate of discharge or have specific pretreatment requirements. The City's pretreatment resolution also defines the requirements for sizing and maintaining the grease traps and/or interceptors. Failure to comply with the limitations and prohibitions presented above may result in the issuance of a Corrective Order and, if the directive of the corrective order is not followed, fines may be imposed on the violator. 10.3.2 Water Reclamation and Reuse The current plant uses chlorinated effluent for wash down purposes within the plant. No offsite use is currently allowed. The plant does not meter wash down water, so the volume of reuse water is not known. 10.3.3 Biosolids Recycling All biosolids generated at the plants are incinerated onsite. The ash is transported to the local transfer station which is then hauled to the landfill. 10.3.4 Sewage Spill Response Plan Emergency response to reported sewage spills in the collection system are forwarded to the Water/Sewer Division. During non -business hours, the City has a rotating assignment among the staff to be on -call to respond to incidents 24 hours a day, 7 days per week. Protection against accidental discharges of pollutants to the WWTP may prompt the director to require the violators to implement spill plans to prevent future discharges. When such plans are required by the director, they shall contain at least the following elements: 1. Description of discharge practices, including non -routine batch discharges; 2. Description of stored chemicals; 3. Procedures for immediately notifying the POTW of any accidental or slug discharge. Such notification must also be given for any discharge which would violate any of the standards in ECC 7.91.010 through 7.91.040; and 4. Procedures to prevent adverse impact from any accidental or slug discharge. Such procedures include, but are not limited to, inspection and maintenance of storage areas, handling and transfer of materials, loading and unloading 10-5 Packet Page 259 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN operations, control of plant site runoff, worker training, building of containment structures or equipment, measures for containing toxic organic pollutants (including solvents), and/or measures and equipment for emergency response. Any discharger is obligated to notify the WWTP immediately upon the occurrence of a slug load or "accidental discharge" of substances regulated by Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. The notification shall include location of discharge, date and time thereof, type of waste, concentration and volume, and corrective actions. Within seven days following an accidental discharge, the user is obligated to submit a detailed written report describing the cause of the discharge and the measures to be taken by the user to prevent similar future occurrences. The City has a reporting protocol that includes informing the Department of Ecology within the next business day of the event. 10.3.5 CMOM The EPA has issued draft regulations implementing the Capacity, Management, Operations, and Maintenance (CMOM) program. CMOM requires the development of facility maintenance plans, tracking of asset condition, establishing level of service and performance goals. Key requirements are outlined below: 1. Capacity Assurance Plan • evaluate existing system; • identify capacity deficiencies; • establish short and long-term remedies to capacity deficiencies. 2. Management Program • specify program goals; • establish organizational structure • legal authority (e.g. service agreements) to manage flow; • establish program measures and ranking of O&M activities based on current capacity and structural deficiencies. • audit documentation of changes in system condition and performance • establish standards and requirements for new construction as well as rehabilitation and repair. 3. Overflow Response Plan (ORP) • steps to respond to SSO's and to implement response plan 4. Audit Operations and Maintenance performance • initial assessment of O&M activities; • establish performance goals, measures and priorities • perform periodic audits to identify progress and required revisions to the program. 10-6 Packet Page 260 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The City Staff has utilized an asset tracking system called Granite. This system is a data management system that chronicles the condition of all known problem segments in the City. This data is included in Appendix F. This data was integrated into the CIP listings in this chapter. 10.3.6 Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan The Federal Water Pollution Control Act established the requirement for a Water Quality Management Plan. Resultantly, RCW 90.71 established the need of a Puget Sound Water Quality Management Plan. The stated objectives of this governance are to recover of the Puget Sound waters by the year 2020. This Comprehensive Sewer Plan is consistent with the intended goals of the Water Quality Management Plan. 10.4 MANAGEMENT SYSTEM / RECORD KEEPING 10.4.1 Collection System The City maintains an ongoing record of existing and as -built sewer extensions. Previously these records were retained as AutoCAD files, though more recently, the City has developed GIS based drawings in an effort to have a more comprehensive and consolidated record of pipe age, size and material, invert and rim elevations, slopes and manhole identifiers. As the GIS mapping expands, the O&M activities should be incorporated into this data base. These activities should include the last time the pipe segments were internally televised, flushed and jetted. It could also include incident reports, backup events and surcharging manholes. 10.4.2 National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit The City's NPDES permit requires that record keeping be maintained and that regular reporting be made to DOE. Any spills in the City's collection system are reported as part of the NPDES Permit requirements. A copy of the City's current NPDES Permit is included in Appendix K. 10.5 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 10.5.1 Wastewater Treatment Plant The treatment plant operates under the current NPDES Permit No. WA-0024058. This permit requires regular reporting of influent loading and effluent mass and concentrations discharged through the existing marine outfall. 10-7 Packet Page 261 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Performance of the plant is presented in Figures 8-1 through 8-4. From the period 2002 through 2012, the plant had no violations of the limits defined in the permits. The NPDES permits also define the maximum allowable influent loadings and concentrations. None of the loading limitations were exceeded for the period 2002 through 2012. In addition, the WWTP has other permits and regulations that affect operations, e.g. PSCAA permit that regulates the air emissions. 10.6 CONDITION ASSESSMENT 10.6.1 Collection System The City staff has an ongoing routine of performing internal inspection of the City's lines. As described in section 10.2.1.2 the staff TVs approximately 230,000 linear feet of pipe each year. These records are retained and reviewed to judge the progression of the deterioration of those pipe segments. The staff also maintains a frequent flush list. The frequency and any particular observances are tracked to specifically address these chronic problem areas. 10.6.2 Lift Stations The City is currently undertaking an aggressive program of lift station rehabilitation. It is anticipated that this program will be concluded in 2013 — 2014. This work is included in Table 9.3. 10.7 SEWER DIVISION STAFFING NEEDS The City employs a total of 7.5 FTE in the Sewer Division. To compare the pipeline and lift station staffing with other wastewater purveyors, the report has looked at the Woodinville Water District, Southwest Suburban Sewer District and Alderwood Water and Wastewater District. The summary below also presents the estimates as used by EPA in the Estimating Costs and Manpower Requirements for Conventional Wastewater Treatment Facilities and Innovative and Alternative Technology Assessment Manual. Agency Service Lift Current Length Person/ Person/ Area, Ac Stations Staff Pipe, LF 100,000 LF 10,000 Ac Woodinville WD 1,261 2 3 181,000 1.66 23.8 10-8 Packet Page 262 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN SWSSD 7,848 11 7 1,419,700 0.50 9.0 AWWD 24,498 14 10 1,942,900 0.50 4.1 City of Edmonds 5,700 14 7.5 680,000 0.90 13.2 EPA Estimate for Edmonds 12.3 As expected, the personnel per acre values decrease as the size of the service area increases. However, using a very conservative application of the EPA guidelines, it would suggest that the City might be under staffed. Prior to adding staff, it is recommended that the City revisit their previous staffing studies to determine if adding staff is warranted. 10.8 WWTP STAFFING The WWTP is staffed 18 hours/day, 7 days/week. The City has a total WWTP Staff of 15 FTE. The EPA Estimating Costs and Manpower Requirements for Conventional Wastewater Treatment Facilities suggests that a WWTP the size and complexity of the Edmonds plants could support 25 FTE. This publication is several years old and tended to overestimate the manpower requirement. 10-9 Packet Page 263 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Chapter 11 - FINANCIAL PLAN 11.1 INTRODUCTION The objective of the sewer system financial plan is first to identify the total cost of providing sewer service, and then to present a financial program that allows the sewer utility to remain financially viable during the execution of its 6-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This viability analysis considers the historical financial condition of the utility, the sufficiency of utility revenues to meet current and future financial and policy obligations, and the financial impact of executing the CIP. 11.2 PAST FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE The City of Edmonds legally owns and operates a combined utility fund that includes water, sewer, and stormwater utilities. Therefore, standard financial statements are not readily available for the sewer utility alone. Financial information regarding an individual utility is available in the form of utility accounting reports at a sub -account level of detail. Using these reports and detailed utility financial data provided by City staff, we tried to construct a simple financial report mimicking income and cash flow statements. Table 11.1 summarizes the water utility's historical revenues, operating expenses, and transfer and debt service payments. Table 11.1: Historical Financial Performance (2008 - 2012 REVENUES Unmeter Sewer Sales Intergovernmental Services Miscellaneous Revenues Total Revenues OPERATING EXPENDITURES Salaries and Wages Benefits Supplies Services Intergovernmental Services City Utility Tax Building, Machinery, & Equipment Interfund Services & Rentals Total Operating Expenditures OPERATING SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) Debt Service Interest $ 4,971,286 $ 5,177,227 $ 5,128,274 $ 5,159,508 $ 5,204,471 1,742,983 1,795,899 1,737,886 1,809,936 2,002,393 234,292 173,053 142,737 186,609 131,085 $ 6,948,561 $ 7,146,179 $ 7,008,896 $ 7,156,053 $ 7,337,950 $ 1,507,104 $ 1,562,851 $ 1,595,992 $ 1,600,811 $ 1,681,040 575,530 594,919 607,642 622,789 642,743 479,094 504,700 475,169 503,698 564,549 1,405,722 1,283,597 1,601,954 1,739,772 1,651,293 234,162 214,280 236,574 194,661 88,441 280,997 469,835 465,215 468,078 445,414 5,823 - - 6,012 - 601,761 522,981 466,899 477,276 539,922 $ 5,090,193 $ 5,153,163 $ 5,449,446 $ 5,613,097 $ 5,613,402 $ 1,858,369 $ 1,993,016 $ 1,559,450 $ 1,542,956 $ 1,724,548 $ 92,616 $ 73,085 $ 66,281 $ 56,819 $ 54,698 SURPLUS / (DEFICIT) AFTER DEBT INTEREST $ 1,765,753 $ 1,919,931 $ 1,493,169 $ 1,486,137 $ 1,669,850 Debt Service Principal $ 656,838 $ 283,307 $ 314,886 $ 318,928 $ 300,796 Interfund Transfers Out for Capital 601,000 1,428,815 3,524,169 661,545 556,874 TOTAL CASH OUTLAY $ 6,440,647 $ 6,938,370 $ 9,354,782 $ 6,650,390 $ 6,525,770 CASH SURPLUS / DEFICIT $ 507,915 $ 207,809 $ (2,345,886) $ 505,663 $ 812,179 11-1 Packet Page 264 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The sewer utility's rate revenues have been stable around $5.2 million in last five years. Historically, the City's growth rate has been low, and the City did not adjust its sewer rater in the last five years. The City utility tax rate was increased from 6% to 10% at the beginning of 2009. As a result the utility's rate revenues increased from approximately $5.0 million in 2008 to $5.2 million in 2009. The City maintains and operates a wastewater treatment plant that also serves the neighboring jurisdictions through interlocal agreements. The City's major partnering jurisdictions the City of Mountlake Terrace, Olympic View Water and Sewer District, and Ronald Sewer District. These jurisdictions share the cost of maintaining and operating the sewer treatment plant proportional to their sewage flow. Revenues from these agencies slightly increased from $1.7 million in 2010 to $2.0 million in 2012. This increase is the result of overall O&M cost increases (as can be seen from the total operating expenditures) and potentially changes in partnering jurisdictions' proportionate shares in total flow. Overall, the utility's total revenues have been stable around $7.0 million in the last five years. Total operating expenditures increased form $5.1 million in 2008 to $5.6 million in 2012. The most noticeable contributors of this increase were the growth in City utility taxes, services, and salaries and wages. As mentioned earlier, the increase in utility tax expenditure was the result of utility tax rate adjustment in 2009. Increases in the other two expense categories were mainly a result of, and in line with, inflationary trends. Over the last five years, the utility posted operating surpluses ($1.7 million on average). These surpluses have been used to make debt service payments (principal and interest), and transferred to the capital construction fund for funding the utility's capital projects. Generally speaking, the utility has not been burdened by its debt service obligations. The utility generated healthy operating surpluses to cover its debt service payments. Over the last five years, the City transferred approximately $6.8 million from the sewer utility's operating fund to the capital construction fund to pay for the utility's capital needs. On average, this amount corresponds to approximately $1.4 million a year. Transfers out for capital peaked in 2010 with approximately $3.5 million transfer. In that year, the utility posted a cash deficit of $2.3 million and used its available cash balances. In the remainder of the analysis period (i.e. 2008 through 2012), the utility generated cash surpluses after paying for its operating expenditures, servicing its debt, and transferring monies for its capital needs. In short, the utility has been financially healthy and self-sufficient in resent years. On the other hand, the utility needs substantial capital investments to rehabilitate its aging infrastructure, as identified in this comprehensive plan. To be able to finance these capital projects and maintain a financially prudent and solid utility, the City would need a series of rate increases. The analysis of the utility's capital funding needs and other financial requirements, and hence projected rate adjustments are provided later in this chapter. 11.3 CAPITAL FUNDING RESOURCES 11-2 Packet Page 265 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN The City may fund the sewer CIP from a variety of sources. In general, these sources can be summarized as: 1) governmental grant and loan programs; 2) publicly issued debt (tax exempt or taxable); and 3) cash resources and revenues. These sources are described below. 11.3.1 Government Programs Historically, federal and state grant programs were available to local utilities for capital funding assistance. However due to budgetary constraints, these assistance programs have been mostly eliminated, substantially reduced in scope and amount, or replaced by loan programs. Remaining miscellaneous grant programs are generally lightly funded and heavily subscribed. Nonetheless, the benefit of even the very low -interest loans makes the effort of applying worthwhile. The major funding sources are as follows: Department of Ecology Grants and Loans. The Department of Ecology (Ecology) Water Quality Program administers three major funding programs that provide low interest loans, grants or loans and grant combinations for projects that protect, preserve and enhance water quality in Washington State. These loan and grant programs are primarily for wastewater projects. Each funding cycle begins in the fall when Ecology accepts project applications. Ecology rates and ranks applications based on the highest -priority needs. The amount of available grant and loan funding varies from year to year based on the state's biennial budget appropriation process and the annual congressional federal budget. The three sources of funding for water quality projects are • Centennial Clean Water Grant Program, • Federal Clean Water Act Section 319 Nonpoint-Source Grant Program, and • Washington State Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund Loan Program. Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) Loans. Cities, towns, counties and special purpose districts are eligible to receive loans. Water, sewer, storm, roads, bridges and solid waste/recycling are eligible and funds may be used for repair, replacement, rehabilitation, reconstruction and improvements including reasonable growth (generally the 20-year growth projection in the comprehensive plan). In 2011, the PWTF Board made some significant changes in its loan programs. Jurisdictions are not required to contribute a local match towards project costs. Standard loan offer is 1 % interest repaid over a 20-year term. Applicants may request alternative loan terms. Shorter repayments terms qualify for a lower interest rate (0.5% for 10-year term, and 0.75% for 15-year term), while longer repayment terms require a higher interest rate (1.5% for 25-year term, and 2% for 30-yearterm). Applicants may qualify for additional interest rate reductions based on financial distress. All loan terms are subject to negotiation and Public Works Board approval. The Public Works Assistance Account did not receive a 2013-15 biennial appropriation. As part of the biennial budget prioritization process, the funding in the Public Works Assistance Account was diverted to the General fund to help pay for competing state priorities 11-3 Packet Page 266 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN all General Obligation Bonds. General obligation (G.O.) bonds are bonds secured by the full faith and credit of the issuing agency, committing all available tax and revenue resources to debt repayment. With this high level of commitment, G.O. bonds have relatively low interest rates and few financial restrictions. However, the authority to issue councilmanic G.O. bonds is restricted in terms of the amount and use of the funds, as defined by the Washington State constitution and statute. Specifically, the amount of debt that can be issued without a public vote is linked to assessed valuation. RCW 39.36.020 states: "(ii) Counties, cities, and towns are limited to an indebtedness amount not exceeding one and one-half percent of the value of the taxable property in such counties, cities, or towns without the assent of three -fifths of the voters therein voting at an election held for that purpose. (b) In cases requiring such assent counties, cities, towns, and public hospital districts are limited to a total indebtedness of two and one-half percent of the value of the taxable property therein. " While bonding capacity can limit availability of councilmanic G.O. bonds for utility purposes, these can sometimes play a valuable role in project financing. A rate savings may be realized through two avenues: the lower interest rate and related bond costs; and the extension of the repayment obligation to all tax -paying properties (not just developed properties) through the authorization of an ad valorem property tax levy. Revenue Bonds. Revenue bonds are commonly used to fund utility capital improvements. The debt is secured by the rate revenues of the issuing utility and the debt obligation does not extend to the City's other revenue sources. With this limited commitment, revenue bonds typically bear higher interest rates than G.O. bonds and also require security conditions related to the maintenance of dedicated reserves (a bond reserve) and financial performance (added bond debt service coverage). The City agrees to satisfy these requirements by ordinance as a condition of bond sale. Revenue bonds can be issued in Washington without a public vote. There is no bonding limit, except perhaps the practical limit of the utility's ability to generate sufficient revenue to repay the debt and provide coverage. In some cases, poor credit might make issuing bonds problematic. 11.3.3 Cash Resources Capital Facilities Charges. A capital facilities charge (CFC) as provided for by RCW 35.92.025, refers to a one-time charge imposed on new customers as a condition of connection to the utility system. The purpose of the CFC is two -fold: (1) to promote equity between new and existing customers; and (2) to provide a source of revenue to fund capital projects. Equity is served by providing a vehicle for new customers to share in the capital costs incurred to support their addition to the system. CFC revenues provide a source of cash flow used to support utility capital needs; revenue can only be used to fund 11-4 Packet Page 267 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN utility capital projects or to pay debt service incurred to finance those projects. In the absence of a CFC, growth -related capital costs must be borne in large part by existing customers. In addition, the net investment in the utility already collected from existing customers, whether through rates, charges and/or assessments, would be diluted by the addition of new customers, effectively subsidizing new customers with prior customers' payments. To establish equity, a CFC should recover a proportionate share of the existing and future infrastructure costs from a new customer. From a financial perspective, a new customer should become financially equivalent to an existing customer by paying the CFC. The City updated its capital facilities charges at the end of 2011, and adopted a three-year phase -in strategy to implement its new capital facilities charges. The City is currently in the second year of its three-year phase -in period. The City currently imposes a charge of $3,495.25 per equivalent dwelling unit (ERU) for its sewer utility. The charge is expected to o up to $4,417 per ERU at the beginning of 2014. Utility Funds and Cash Reserves. User charges (rates) paid by the utility's customers are the main funding source for all sewer utility activities. The rates cover total annual costs associated with operation and maintenance of the sewer system, and other ongoing costs of providing sewer services. Rates can pay for capital improvement projects in two ways: either paying for debt service or directly paying for capital projects. Although funding the capital costs directly through rates does not result in the additional interest expense associated with issuing debt, this approach can cause large and/or volatile rate increases. 11.3.4 Summary An ideal funding strategy would include the use of grants and low-cost loans when debt issuance is required. However, these resources are very limited and competitive in nature and do not provide a reliable source of funding for planning purposes. It is recommended that the City pursue these funding avenues but assume for planning purposes that bond financing will be utilized to meet needs above the utility's available cash resources. G.O. bonds may be useful for special circumstances, but due to the bonding capacity limits, this vehicle is most often reserved for other City (non -utility) purposes. Revenue bonds are a more secure financing mechanism for utility needs. The Capital Financing Strategy developed to fund the updated CIP assumes the following funding priority: 1. Available grant funds, 2. Accumulated capital cash reserves, 3. Annual use of excess cash (above minimum balance targets) from operating reserves, 4. Capital reserves and other miscellaneous capital resources, including government program loans to the extent that they are accessible, 5. Revenue bond financing, and 6. Direct rate funding. 11-5 Packet Page 268 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN 11.4 FINANCIAL PLAN The City of Edmonds' sewer utility operates as an enterprise fund and as such it is responsible for funding all of its related costs. It is not dependent on general tax revenues or general fund resources. The primary source of funding for the utility is sewer service charges. The City controls the level of service charges by ordinance, and subject to statutory authority, can adjust user charges as needed to meet financial objectives. The financial plan can only provide a qualified assurance of financial feasibility if it considers the total system costs of providing sewer service — both operating and capital. To meet these objectives, the following elements are completed: • Capital Funding Plan — This plan identifies total CIP obligations for the planning period 2013 — 2019. The plan defines a strategy for funding the CIP, including an analysis of available resources from rate revenues, existing reserves, capital facilities charges, debt financing and any special resources that may be readily available (e.g. grants, developer contributions, etc). The capital funding plan impacts the financial plan through the use of debt financing (resulting in annual debt service) and the assumed rate revenue resources available for capital funding. • Financial Plan — This forecast identifies annual non -capital costs associated with the operation, maintenance, and administration of the sewer system. Included in the financial plan is a reserve analysis that forecasts cash flow and fund balance activity along with testing for satisfaction of actual or recommended minimum fund balance policies. The financial plan ultimately evaluates the sufficiency of utility revenues in meeting all obligations, including cash uses such as operating expenses, debt service, and reserve contributions, as well as any coverage requirements associated with long-term debt. 11.4.1 Financial Policies A brief summary of the key financial policy assumptions used in the financial analysis, as well as those recommended in the financial program are discussed below: Reserve Policies. Utility reserves serve multiple functions. They can be used to address variability and timing of expenditures and receipts, occasional disruptions in activities, costs or revenues, utility debt obligations; and many other functions. The collective use of individual reserves helps to limit the City's exposure to revenue shortfalls and meet long- term capital obligations. Common reserves among municipal utilities are operating reserves, capital contingency reserves, and bond reserves. • Operating Reserve — An operating reserve, or working capital reserve, provides a minimum unrestricted fund balance needed to accommodate the short-term cycles of revenues and expenses. These reserves are intended to address both anticipated and unanticipated changes in revenues and expenses. Anticipated changes may include billing and receipt cycles, payroll cycles, and other payables. Operating reserves can be used to meet short-term cash deficiencies due to the timing of actual revenues and expenditures. 11-6 Packet Page 269 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN Generally, utilities target a certain number of days of working capital as a beginning cash balance to provide the liquidity needed to allow regular management of payables and payment cycles. Consistent with industry practice, a working capital reserve of between 45 to 60 days of operating and maintenance (O&M) expenses are targeted in this analysis. Based upon the City's 2013 budget, the target range is equivalent to between $700,000 and $935,000. • Capital Contingency Reserve — A capital contingency reserve is an amount of cash set aside in case of an emergency should a piece of equipment or a portion of the utility's infrastructure fail unexpectedly. Additionally, the reserve could be used for other unanticipated capital needs including capital project cost overruns. There are various approaches to identifying an appropriate level for this reserve, such as (1) identifying a percentage of utility system fixed asset costs and, (2) determining the cost of replacing highly critical assets or facilities. As an industry standard, the target capital contingency reserve is typically set at 1-2% of original asset value or average annual CIP spending. For purposes of this analysis, no minimum target fund balance is set, per City staff's direction, to reduce the utility's rate adjustment needs. • Bond Reserve — Bond covenants often establish reserve requirements as a means of protecting an agency against the risk of nonpayment. This bond reserve can be funded with cash on hand, but is more often funded at the time of borrowing as part of the bond principal. This reserve requirement can also be met by using a surety bond. The City maintains a restricted bond reserve in compliance with its bond covenants. System Reinvestment Policies. The purpose of system reinvestment funding is to provide for the replacement of aging system facilities to ensure sustainability of the system for ongoing operation. Each year, the utility's assets lose value, and as they lose value they are moving toward eventual replacement. That accumulating loss in value and future liability is typically measured for reporting purposes through annual depreciation expense, which is based on the original cost of the asset over its anticipated useful life. While this expense reflects the consumption of the existing asset and its original investment, the replacement of that asset will likely cost much more, factoring in inflation and construction conditions. Therefore, the added annual replacement liability is even greater than the annual depreciation expense. On the spectrum of policy options related to system reinvestment funding, basing a system reinvestment policy on the projected replacement cost of assets would result in the largest immediate rate impact and the lowest future debt obligation. A policy based on annual depreciation expense has the next greatest immediate rate impact. This policy does not target a replacement reserve level sufficient to cash fund 100% of future replacement costs and therefore assumes some replacement costs will be debt -financed. One approach aimed at mitigating the accumulating asset replacement liability, as well as current rate impacts, is to fund an amount from rates equal to annual depreciation expense, net of annual debt principal repayment. Annual debt principal payments are one source of annual equity contribution to the system. Using annual depreciation expense as the measure of annual equity loss, and basis for a system reinvestment policy, it is 11-7 Packet Page 270 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN appropriate then, to reduce the annual depreciation expense by the annual equity contribution, as measured by debt principal repayment. This approach tends to balance reducing near -term rate impacts with mitigating accumulating asset replacement liability. The analysis provided herein does not incorporate any system reinvestment funding, per City staff's direction, to reduce immediate rate impacts. Debt Policies. Bond covenants often establish a minimum debt coverage ratio as a means of protecting an agency against the risk of nonpayment. Typically, the revenue bond coverage requirement is expressed as a multiple of the annual debt service payment, and ranges between 1.25 and 2.00 (the higher the perceived creditworthiness of borrower, lower the bond coverage requirement). A 1.25 coverage requirement means that annual rate revenue must be set sufficient to support annual operating expenses, annual revenue bond debt repayment, and a cushion of 25% of the annual revenue bond debt repayment. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that the sewer utility will meet a 1.25 revenue bond coverage ratio independently, without relying on the City's water and stormwater utilities' financial performance. 11.4.2 Capital Funding Plan The CIP developed for this plan totals $26.5 million (City of Edmonds' share only; $28.4 million inflated) over the 2013-2019 planning horizon. Costs are stated in 2013 dollars and escalated to the year of planned spending for financing projections at an annual inflation rate of 3%. The CIP consists of three components; wastewater treatment plant projects, collection system projects, and projects driven by the operating needs and/or to improve operating efficiency. Partnering jurisdictions (i.e. City of Edmonds, City of Mountlake Terrace, Olympic View Water and Sewer District, and Ronald Sewer District) share the cost of wastewater treatment plant projects based on each jurisdiction's capacity share in the treatment plan in accordance to the interlocal agreement dated May 17, 1988. The City of Edmonds' share is 50.787%. Table 11.2 summarizes annual CIP expenditures in 2013 and inflated costs. Table 11.2: Capital Improvement Program (2013 — 2019) Zils/IY L'mmll Z11b Zilb1 1 1 In 2013 Dollars WWTP Projects - Total $ 1,910,704 $ 981,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,005,000 $ 975,000 $ 930,000 $ 975,000 $ 7,776,704 WWTP Projects - City of Edmonds' Share $ 970,389 $ 498,220 $ 507,870 $ 510,409 $ 495,173 $ 472,319 $ 495,173 $ 3,949,555 Collection System Projects 5,842,110 3,338,350 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 19,180,460 Maintenance Related Projects 743,000 597,000 754,000 440,000 425,000 425,000 - 3,384,000 TOTAL CIP forthe CITY OF EDMONDS $ 7,555,499 $ 4,433,570 $ 3,261,870 $ 2,950,409 $ 2,920,173 $ 2,897,319 $ 2,495,173 $ 26,514,014 Inflated Dollars WWTPProjects - Total $ 1,910,704 $ 1,010,430 $ 1,060,900 $ 1,098,191 $ 1,097,371 $ 1,078,125 $ 1,164,201 $ 8,419,922 WWTP Projects - City of Edmonds' Share $ 970,389 $ 513,167 $ 538,799 $ 557,738 $ 557,322 $ 547,547 $ 591,263 $ 4,276,226 Collection System Projects 5,842,110 3,438,500 2,121,800 2,185,454 2,251,018 2,318,548 2,388,105 20,545,534 Maintenance Related Projects 743,000 614,910 799,919 480,800 478,341 492,691 - 3,609,661 TOTAL CIP forthe CITY OF EDMONDS $ 7,555,499 $ 4,566,577 $ 3,460,518 $ 3,223,992 $ 3,286,681 $ 3,358,787 $ 2,979,367 $ 28,431,421 11-8 Packet Page 271 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN A capital funding plan is developed to determine the total resources available to meet CIP costs and determine if new debt financing will be required. The City is assumed to entirely fund its share by the sewer utility's sources (either by cash financing or debt issues). The 2013 beginning balance of the sewer utility fund was $7,603,137. Of this amount, $1,250,000 is assumed to be used as working capital based on the set operating fund target balances, and the remainder ($6,353,137) is assumed to be available for capital. The capital funding plan is summarized in Table 11-3 below. I able 1 1.3: Annual Capital Fund Gash Flow (ZU13 - ZU'19 Beginning Balance $ 6,353,137 $ 7,816,336 $ 3,536,609 $ 565,048 $ 3,332,689 $ 515,476 $ 3,061,366 plus: Grants / Donations / Outside Sources 47,000 - - - - - - plus: Capital Facilities Charges 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 plus: Net Debt Proceeds Available for Projects 8,300,000 - - 5,800,000 - 5,700,000 - plus: Interest Earnings 15,883 19,541 17,683 4,238 33,327 6,443 45,920 plus: Transfer of Surplus from Operating Fund 645,816 257,309 461,274 177,395 426,140 188,234 44,488 less: Capital Expenditures (7,555,499) (4,566,577) (3,460,518) (3,223,992) (3,286,681) (3,358,787) (2,979,367) Ending Balance $ 7,816,336 $ 3,536,609 $ 565,048 $ 3,332,689 $ 515,476 $ 3,061,366 $ 182,407 The costs shown in the table are inflated to the year of spending. A majority (70%) of the 7-year CIP is projected to be financed with new debt issues. The remaining 30% of the 7- year CIP is financed from utility resources such as existing cash balances, rates, capital facility charge revenues, and capital fund interest earnings. The capital funding strategy anticipated three bond issues, one in 2013 in the amount of $8.3 million (the City is already in the process of issuing), the second one in 2016 in the amount of $5.8 million, and the last one in 2018 in the amount of $5.7 million. 11.4.3 Financial Forecast The Financial Forecast, or revenue requirement analysis, projects the amount of annual rate revenue needed to meet utility's financial obligations. The analysis incorporates operating revenues, operating and maintenance (O&M) expenses, debt service payments, rate funded capital needs, and any other identified revenues or expenses related to utility operations, and determines the sufficiency of the current level of rates. Revenue needs are also impacted by debt covenants (typically applicable to revenue bonds) and specific fiscal policies and financial goals of the utility (as described above). For this analysis, two revenue sufficiency criteria have been developed to reflect the financial goals and constraints of the utility: (1) cash needs must be met and (2) debt coverage requirements must be realized. In order to operate successfully with respect to these goals, both tests of revenue sufficiency must be met. Cash Test. The cash flow test identifies all known cash requirements for the utility in each year of the planning period. Capital needs are identified and a capital funding strategy is established. This may include the use of debt, cash reserves, outside assistance, and rate funding. Cash requirements to be funded from rates are determined. Typically, these include O&M expenses, debt service payments, system reinvestment funding or directly funded capital outlays, and any additions to specified reserve balances. The total annual cash needs of the utility are then compared to total operating revenues (under current 11-9 Packet Page 272 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN rates) to forecast annual revenue surpluses or shortfalls. Coverage Test. The coverage test is based on a commitment made by the City when issuing revenue bonds. For purposes of this analysis, revenue bond debt is assumed for any needed debt issuance. As a security condition of issuance, the City is required per covenant to agree that the revenue bond debt would have a higher priority for payment (a senior lien) than most other utility expenditures; the only outlays with a higher lien are O&M expenses. Debt service coverage is expressed as a multiplier of the annual revenue bond debt service payment. For example, a 1.0 coverage factor would imply no additional cushion is required. A 1.25 coverage factor means revenues must be sufficient to pay O&M expenses, annual revenue bond debt service payments, plus an additional 25% of annual revenue bond debt service payments. The excess cash flow derived from the added coverage, if any, can be used for any utility purpose, including funding capital projects. The existing coverage requirement on the City's outstanding revenue bonds is 1.25 times bond debt. In determining the annual revenue requirement, both cash and coverage sufficiency tests must be met — the test with the greatest deficiency drives the level of needed rate increase in any given year. The analysis uses this rate revenue requirement to indicate annual rate adjustments. 11.4.4 Projected Financial Performance The revenue requirement analysis is based on the following data, assumptions, and adjustments: • The 2013 budget is used as the basis of the analysis. • Rate revenues under existing rates are calculated to increase with customer growth. Customer growth assumptions are provided by City staff, and projected to be approximately 0.5% per year. • Labor costs (i.e. salaries and wages) are escalated annually at 3%. • Benefits costs are escalated annually at 10%. • Other operating and maintenance expenses are escalated annually at 3%. • The City's annual fund interest earnings rate is assumed to be 0.25 in 2013 and 2014. From this level, it is assumed to increase by 25 basis points (i.e. 0.25%) each year, reaching 1.5% in 2019. • Inflated capital expenses reflect annual construction cost inflation of 3% starting in 2014. • In addition to maintenance and operating costs, revenue requirements include capital costs for new debt service incurred to fund the CIP. • The City is currently in the process of issuing a revenue bond in 2003 to fund capital financing needs of its three utilities (i.e. sewer, water, and stormwater) through 2015. The analysis presented herein is based on the draft borrowing terms and repayment schedule for the anticipated 2013 issue as provided by City's bond advisor. • The forecast assumes a revenue bond interest rate of 5%, a repayment term of 20 years, and required coverage of 1.25 times debt service for the proposed subsequent bond issues. ii-10 Packet Page 273 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN • The 2013 beginning balance of the sewer utility fund was $7,603,137. Of this amount, $1,250,000 is assumed to be used as working capital based on the set operating fund target balances, and the remainder is assumed to be transferred to capital fund. Table 11.4 summarizes the projected financial performance and rate revenue requirements of the stormwater utility for 2013 through 2019 based upon the above assumptions. Table 11.4: Summary of Revenue Reauirements (2013 - 2019 Revenues Rate Revenues Under Existing Rates Non -Rate Revenues Total Revenues Expenses 411 Sewer Cash O&M Expenses [a] 411 Treatment O&M - Edmonds Only Transfer to Fund 414 (excl. Capital) Exdsting Debt Service New Debt Service Total Expenses Annual Rate Adjustment Rate Revenues After Rate Increase Net Cash Flow After Rate Increase Coverage After Rate Increases $ 4,935,000 $ 4,959,675 $ 4,984,473 $ 5,009,396 $ 5,034,443 $ 5,059,615 $ 5,084,913 69,030 69,670 73,953 78,432 88,181 94,361 108,246 $ 5,004,030 $ 5,029,345 $ 5,058,427 $ 5,087,828 $ 5,122,624 $ 5,153,976 $ 5,193,159 $ 2,193,939 $ 2,280,066 $ 2,370,761 $ 2,466,216 $ 2,566,759 $ 2,672,749 $ 2,767,128 1,888,449 1,962,640 2,040,811 2,123,256 2,210,296 2,302,282 2,399,595 130,201 130,500 130,807 130,785 130,098 129,695 129,979 352,792 193,771 193,561 192,803 192,476 192,138 191,252 111,637 493,478 494,508 1,001,492 999,546 1,499,637 1,498,378 $ 4,677,018 $ 5,060,454 $ 5,230,448 $ 5,914,551 $ 6,099,175 $ 6,796,501 $ 6,986,331 $ 4,935,000 $ 5,282,054 $ 5,653,514 $ 6,051,098 $ 6,476,641 $ 6,932,111 $ 6,966,771 327,012 291,270 497,020 214,979 465,647 229,971 88,687 8.04 5.38 5.86 3.39 3.73 2.76 2.76 [a] Includes additional taxes due to proposed rate increases. As shown in the table, revenues under the existing rates are not sufficient to fund projected rate needs. The projected revenue deficiency is primarily due to new debt repayment obligations and funding of the proposed capital improvement program. It is projected that the City will need to increase its water rates by approximately 6.5% annually in 2014 through 2018. The analysis assumes that the rate adjustments would be implemented at the beginning of each year, and the new rates will be in effect for the entire year. Table 11.5 below demonstrates the projected cash balances (operating, capital, and debt reserve funds) for the stormwater utility, assuming that the rate increases proposed in Table 11.4 above are implemented. i able 1 1.5: F'rolectea cash tsaiances tzui 3 - zul9 Operating Fund $ 931,197 $ 965,158 $1,000,904 $1,038,488 $ 1,077,995 $1,119,732 $1,163,931 Capital Fund 7,816,336 3,536,609 565,048 3,332,689 515,476 3,061,366 182,407 Debt Reserve Fund 629,455 629,455 629,455 1,135,466 1,135,466 1,632,752 1,632,752 Total $ 9,376,988 $ 5,131,222 $ 2,195,407 $ 5,506,643 $ 2,728,936 $ 5,813,850 $ 2,979,089 Combined Minimum Target Balance $ 961,374 $1, 315, 763 $ 1, 343, 602 $1, 878, 774 $1, 906, 458 $ 2, 437, 852 $ 2, 469, 742 The City is considering implementing higher rate adjustments to reduce its reliance on debt financing and start cash financing the utility's approximately $2.0 million a year repair Packet Page 274 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN and replacement needs by 2019. If the City were to implement this policy decision, the needed annual rate adjustments would be 10% in 2014 through 2018. The projected financial performance of the sewer utility under this scenario is summarized in Table 11.6. Table 11.6: Summary of Revenue Reauirements (2013 - 2019) - Alternative Scenario Revenues Rate Revenues Under Existing Rates Non -Rate Revenues Total Revenues Expenses 411 Sewer Cash O&M Expenses [a] 411 Treatment O&M - Edmonds Only Transfer to Fund 414 (excl. Capital) Existing Debt Service New Debt Service Rate Funded CIP Total Expenses Annual Rate Adjustment Rate Revenues After Rate Increase Net Cash Flow After Rate Increase Coverage After Rate Increases $ 4,935,000 $ 4,959,675 $ 4,984,473 $ 5,009,396 $ 5,034,443 $ 5,059,615 $ 5,084,913 69,030 69,670 73,953 78,432 88,181 94,361 101,964 $ 5,004,030 $ 5,029,345 $ 5,058,427 $ 5,087,828 $ 5,122,624 $ 5,153,976 $ 5,1863877 $ 2,193,939 $ 2,286,752 $ 2,385,310 $ 2,489,960 $ 2,601,207 $ 2,719,607 $ 2,814,220 1,888,449 1,962,640 2,040,811 2,123,256 2,210,296 2,302,282 2,399,595 130,201 130,500 130,807 130,785 130,098 129,695 129,979 352,792 193,771 193,561 192,803 192,476 192,138 191,252 111,637 493,478 494,508 1,001,492 999,546 1,080,869 1,079,610 - - - 1,106,014 $ 4,677,018 $ 5,067,140 $ 5,244,997 $ 5,938,295 $ 6,133,623 $ 6,424,591 $ 7,720,669 000, 10.00% 10.00%0000.0i 000iim $ 4,935,000 $ 5,455,643 $ 6,031,213 $ 6,667,506 $ 7,370,928 $ 8,148,560 $ 8,189,303 327,012 458,172 860,170 807,643 1,325,486 1,818,330 570,599 8.04 5.67 6.49 3.94 4.54 4.78 4.74 [a] Includes additional taxes due to proposed rate increases. Table 11.7 below demonstrates the projected cash balances (operating, capital, and debt reserve funds) for the sewer utility under this scenario, again assuming that the rate increases shown in Table 11.7 above are implemented. I apse i i . t: Proiected cash balances (zU1 3 - zU1 9) - Alternative Scenario Operating Fund $ 931,197 $ 965,158 $ 1,000,904 $ 1,038,488 $ 1,077,995 $ 1,119,732 $ 1,163,931 Capital Fund 7,816,336 3,703,511 1,095,934 4,460,221 2,514,121 1,873,354 564,500 Debt Reserve Fund 629,455 629,455 629,455 1,135,466 1,135,466 1,213,985 1,213,985 Total $ 9,376,988 $ 5,298,124 $ 2,726,293 $ 6,634,174 $ 4,727,581 $ 4,207,070 $ 2,942,415 Combined Minimum Target Balance $ 961,374 $1, 315, 763 $1, 343, 602 $1, 878, 774 $1, 906, 458 $ 2, 019, 085 $ 2, 050, 974 If the City is able to obtain available low cost loan and/or grant alternatives to fund its capital needs, required rate increases would be less than the projected rate increases presented above. It is important to note that these projections are based upon current assumptions and the capital program identified herein. Circumstances might change over time, causing actual rate adjustments to be higher or lower once actual costs are known. It is imperative that the City track its costs as they become available and compare them to assumptions used in the study. If significant changes occur, the City should revisit the analysis and make appropriate changes. 11.5 CURRENT AND PROJECTED RATES The City charges its residential sewer customers a flat bi-monthly (in some cases, 11-12 Packet Page 275 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN monthly) rate on a "per dwelling unit" basis. All other customers are charged a bi-monthly base charge and a uniform volume charge. The volume charge is applied on a per hundred cubic feet (ccf) of water consumption basis. The City's current (2013) sewer rates are as follows: 1 QNIt7 1 1.0. A 1131L 11U JUVVUI ROLV: Single-family residences Connected $ 50.64 Unconnected 8.16 Duplexes and multi -unit residences Connected (per unit) $ 40.69 Unconnected (per unit) 8.16 All other customers Fixed rate (per account) $ 5.76 Volume rate (per ccf) 3.26 Table 11.9 presents the City's projected sewer rates incorporating the rate adjustments shown in the financial forecasts under the baseline implementation scenario. lame i i.u: vrojectea Sewer Kates (Lu14 - 1U1U Projected Rate Increases 6.50% 6.50% 6.50% 6.50% 6.50% 0.00% Single-family residences Connected $ 53.93 $ 57.44 $ 61.17 $ 65.15 $ 69.38 $ 69.38 Unconnected 8.69 9.26 9.86 10.50 11.18 11.18 Duplexes and multi -unit residences Connected (per unit) $ 43.33 $ 46.15 $ 49.15 $ 52.35 $ 55.75 $ 55.75 Unconnected (per unit) 8.69 9.26 9.86 10.50 11.18 11.18 All other customers Fixed rate (per account) $ 6.13 $ 6.53 $ 6.96 $ 7.41 $ 7.89 $ 7.89 Volume rate (per ccf) 3.47 3.70 3.94 4.19 4.47 4.47 Table 11.10 presents the City's projected sewer rates incorporating the rate adjustments shown in the financial forecasts under the alternative scenario. 11-13 Packet Page 276 of 895 COMPREHENSIVE SEWER PLAN I able 11.1 u: Projected sewer Kates (ZU14 - ZU'19) -Alternative Scenario Projected Rate Increases 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 0.00% Single-family residences Connected $ 55.70 $ 61.27 $ 67.40 $ 74.14 $ 81.56 $ 81.56 Unconnected 8.98 9.87 10.86 11.95 13.14 13.14 Duplexes and multi -unit residences Connected (per unit) $ 44.76 $ 49.23 $ 54.16 $ 59.57 $ 65.53 $ 65.53 Unconnected (per unit) 8.98 9.87 10.86 11.95 13.14 13.14 All other customers Fixed rate (per account) $ 6.34 $ 6.97 $ 7.67 $ 8.43 $ 9.28 $ 9.28 Volume rate (per ccf) 3.59 3.94 4.34 4.77 5.25 5.25 11.6 CONCLUSION Starting in 2014, the City's current rates are projected to be insufficient to fully fund the forecasted financial obligations of the utility. New financial obligations for which the utility will require additional rate revenues are mostly driven by the capital financing impacts (i.e. debt service payments for the new bond issues) of the proposed $26.5 million total CIP (2013 dollars; $28.4 million inflated dollars). To generate adequate working capital to fund utility obligations and meet annual cash flow and debt service coverage requirements, a series of rate increases will be needed in years 2014 through 2018. 11-14 Packet Page 277 of 895 APPENDIX A I&I Study Packet Page 278 of 895 City of Edmonds Inflow /Infiltration Study June 2010 ■ 5;L A N S 1601 5th Ave Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 505-3400 O T E:LRe j�C H In rastru�ture rou 1420 Fifth Avenue. Suite 600. Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel 206.883,9300 Fax 206.683.9301 www.tetratech.com Packet Page 279 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study City of Edmonds INFLOW / INFILTRATION STUDY June 2010 City Council Michael Plunkett — Position #1 Strom Peterson — Position #2 Adrienne Fraley-Monillas — Position #3 Diane Buckshnis — Position #4 D.J. Wilson — Position #5 Steve Bernheim — Position #6 David Orvis — Position #7 Director of Public Works Noel Miller, P.E. City Engineer Rob English, P.E. This Document was prepared Under the direct supervision of Craig P. Chambers, P.E. Director of Engineering, BHC Consultants Maintenance & Operation Jim Waite Steve Koho -t- Packet Page 280 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study City of Edmonds Inflow and Infiltration Study Section Paqe I. Introduction 1 II. Basin Delineation 2 III. Rainfall and Flow Data Reduction 9 IV. Presentation of Historical Data 10 V. Recommendations for Smoke Testing 15 VI. Capital Improvement Projects in VII. Proposed Standards, Policies and Guidelines 24 APPENDICES A. Flow Data for August 2008, April 2008, December 2006 and December 2007 for the following Meters: a. Meter 1 b. Meter 2 c. Meter 3 d. Meter A e. Meter B f. Meter C g. Meter D h. Meter E i. Edmonds - WWTP Meter j. MILT — WWTP Meter k. Pump Station No. 1 B. Proposed Standards, Policies and Guidelines -H- Packet Page 281 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study Standards a. S-1 Storm Drainage Connections to the Sanitary Sewer System b. S-2 Connections to Existing Sewer System C. S-3 Allowable Connections to Side Sewers d. S-4 Visual Inspection of Manholes for SSES Investigations e. S-5 CCTV Inspections of Sewers for SSES Investigations f. S-6 Smoke Testing for SSES Investigations g. S-7 Dye Testing for SSES Investigations h. S-8 Design Capacity for Pipeline Rehabilitation Projects i. S-9 Sewers on Steep Slopes j. S-10 Manhole Locations and Covers k. S-11 Manhole Size I. S-12 Sewer System Design m. S-13 Manhole Joints n. S-14 Side Sewer Connection Location and Taps o. S-15 Abandonment Requirements p. S-16 Pipe Materials q. S-17 Pipe Rehabilitation Methods r. S-18 Inspection Wyes/Cleanouts S. S-19 Inspection of Pipe Installation and Backfill t. S-20 Pipe Zone Bedding and Trench Backfill (Side Sewers) u. S-21 Manhole Leveling Rings V. S-22 Root Intrusion w. S-23 Root Intrusion (Side Sewers) X. S-24 Pipeline Leak Testing y. S-25 Sanitary Side Sewer Inspection Z. S-26 Side Sewer/Lateral Leak Testing aa. S-27 Manhole Leak Inspection bb. S-28 Product Specific Inspection cc. S-29 Product Specific Inspection (Side Sewer) dd. S-30 CCTV Inspection ee. S-31 CCTV Inspection (Side Sewers) ff. S-32 Certification, Warranty and Qualifications gg. S-33 Bonding and Warrant Inspection Policies a. P-1 Community Education and Involvement b. P-2 Responsibility for Community Education C. P-3 Public Funding d. P-4 Rates, Incentives and Surcharges e. P-5 Cost Sharing f. P-6 Stormwater Drainage Ordinances g. P-7 On -site Storm Drainage Management h. P-8 Infeasible or Prohibitively Expensive Modifications i. P-9 Contractor Qualifications -Hi- Packet Page 282 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study j. P-10 Required Permits k. P-11 Inspection and Testing I. P-12 Property Restoration m. P-13 Contractor Bonding, Licensing and Warranty n. P-14 Access to Private Property o. P-15 Limiting Liability p. P-16 Legislative Action Requirements q. P-17 Side Sewer Ownership and Responsibility Guidelines a. G-1 Modeling and Engineering Analysis b. G-2 Lateral and Side Sewer Rehabilitation Methods c. G-3 Pipe Protection - Depth of Cover d. G-4 Manhole Rehabilitation e. G-5 Spot Repairs f. G-6 Spot Repairs (Side Sewers) g. G-7 Manhole Lids/Inserts -1V- Packet Page 283 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study I. Introduction In recent years during significant storm events, flows at the City's wastewater treatment plant were recorded at levels previously not experienced. These peak flows reportedly created surcharged conditions, though the surcharging hasn't resulted in reported overflows. Historically, peak flows in the City's sanitary sewer system have been recorded as progressively increasing in response to wet weather events. These trends exceed the expected flows resulting from new connections. In an effort to be proactive, the City wants to identify and correct the most egregious sources of Inflow and Infiltration (1/1). It is understood that this focus will require an on -going effort that may well extend beyond a single year's activities. Though the goal is to find and fix the most severe problems, it is likely that some of the identified sources will have a secondary element that will prohibit the separation of the 1/1. For instance, those sources that will result in significant environmental and/or permitting issues will be identified and logged but will not be slated for immediate correction. Similarly, those circumstances that include the disconnection of downspouts and that result in saturation of hillsides, the potential creation of unsafe stability issues and downstream flooding will similarly be placed in abeyance. Throughout the creation of this report, both BHC and City staff have worked jointly together to assemble, refine and analyze the existing rainfall and flow data. Similarly, this report sought to estimate the volume of 1/1 within selected drainage basins, present a proposed solution for 1/1 separation and estimate the associated costs of 1/1 separation. This report also developed City Standards, Procedures, Policies and Guidelines that provide direct benefit in the long-term reduction of 1/1 into the City collection system. And lastly, this report also includes the identification and assessment of egregious pipe conditions found in the City collection systems due to root intrusion or other City identified conditions. During this 1/1 assessment phase, the report also prioritizes and selects 1/1 reduction projects from the project areas. In doing so the report prepares a Capital Improvement Plan for 1/1 rehabilitation and root intrusion impacted collection systems. BHC Consultants, as the Prime Consultant and Program Manager, lead and coordinated the work performed. Based on historical flow data, peaking factors at the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) have been in the order of 4.0 for a typical spring storm to as high as 7.6 -1- Packet Page 284 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study for the December 2006 storm event.. Peaking factors are defined as the peak hourly flows divided by the average annual flows. These values, when compared to other western Washington WWTP are not particularly out of line. This does not suggest that the peaks experienced at the plant are inconsequential and should be ignored. These high flow events have twice nearly resulted in bypassing the biological treatment portion of the plant, which most certainly would have occurred had there not been a mechanical failure in one of the upstream pump stations. However, flows to the WWTP are complicated by the flow swapping agreement that Edmonds has with King County. This flow swapping, in some ways, masks the severity of the 1/1 problems. This, coupled with a troubling trend that suggests that the peaking factors are continuing to increase, has caused the City to analyze, identify and correct 1/1 sources now before the hydraulic capacity of the plant is exceeded. By initiating a proactive program of identifying and removing 1/1 the City may be able to postpone or eliminate costly hydraulic expansions of the WWTP. Furthermore, the City's new NPDES permit requires an annual report that summarizes 1/1 removal measures that have been taken. In an effort to identify the suspected worst basins, two standard comparative measurements were used to judge the severity of 1/1 within the catchment basins and also allow comparison with other agencies that have completed independent 1/1 studies previously. These measurements are: • Gallons 1/1 per acre per day • Gallons 1/1 per inch -diameter -mile per day Based on City -provided data for the length and sizes of sewer mains within each catchment area, similar data from the tributary areas from the City of Mountlake Terrace and Ronald Sewer District, this analysis will be able to identify the most likely basins with the most severe 1/I. II. Basin Delineation From the 2006 Comprehensive Sewer Plan and basin boundary information provided by the City staff, the drainage basins which are tributary to the City's WWTP were identified. These basins were confirmed with the O&M staff to verify that the basins are correctly represented. Using existing data for parcels, streets and public right-of-ways, and City sewer mapping and manhole information a base map was created identifying the catchment areas for each basin. The delineation of the basins is defined by two determining conditions or criteria, 1) area directly tributary to permanent flow meters that are in place and 2) area directly tributary to pump stations. The pump stations are not equipped with flow -2- Packet Page 285 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study meters and the determination of flows was derived from the pump run records and a verification of the pumping capacity. Flow data from the following flow meters and pump stations were used in this analysis: • Meter A • Meter B • Meter C • Meter D • Meter E • Meter 1 • Meter 2 • Meter 3 • Pump Station No. 1 • WWTP Flow Meter - MILT • WWTP Flow Meter - Edmonds The direct use of this flow data (or in some cases the subtraction of flow data between adjacent flow meters) provided the basis for defining flows from discrete basins which are schematically represented in Figure 1 and graphically presented in Figure 2. With the basins delineated an inventory of the existing piping systems was developed. Table 1 includes an individual basin breakdown of the catchment acreage, estimated length of main line sewer, the average diameter of those pipes and the inch - diameter - mile of pipe in each catchment area. This baseline data forms the foundation for determining the metric of comparison between basins (i.e. gallons 1/1 per acre per day and gallons 1/1 per inch -diameter - mile per day). It should be also noted that the City contracts with the following agencies for wastewater conveyance and treatment services: • City of Mountlake Terrace • Ronald Sewer District • Olympic View Water and Sewer District • King County The meter configuration allows a direct analysis of 1/1 contributions from Mountlake Terrace and Ronald Sewer District. Similarly, the flows that originate from Olympic View Water and Sewer District cannot be separated or isolated from the Edmonds flows without additional flow meter installation. Flows from the Richmond Beach Pump Station include flows from the Town of Woodway and King County. -3- Packet Page 286 of 895 FILE NAME (UPDATED BY) I PLOT DATE & TIME I MLT MLT [EDMONDS RONALD EDMONDS EDMONDS ZONE M-2 ZONE M-1 ZONE E-9 ZONE R-1 ZONE L-3 ZONE E-6 EDMONDS ZONE E-2 ZONE 1 ---------- EDMONDS OVWD ZONE E-7 ZONE O 1 I EDMONDS I ZONE E-21 I EDMONDS ZONE E-1 I I I MLT ZONE M-3 I ZONE 2 I METER 1 1 RONALD ZONE R-2 OVWD ZONE O-2 METER A r I METER B METER D WOODWAY RICHMOND BEACH P.S. RICHMOND — — — , BEACH f OVWD I INFLUENT I ZONE 0-5 METER AT METE f yWyTP METER3 EDMONDS EDMONDS BALLINGER PUMP STATION OVWD EDMONDS ZONE 0-3 METER 2 I ZONE E-7A--LME' EDMONDS ZONE E-42 I LNALDNE R-3 ZONE O 4 MLT BALL APTS ZONE B-1 ZONE E-40 ZONE E-4 I WOODWAY 11 EDMONDS PS #1 ZONE W-2 II ZONE E-5 WOODWAY I� EDMONDS II I ZONE W-1 �� PS #8 ZONE E-51 I I PS #3 LS-01 EDMONDS ZONE ZONE E-52 L0EDMONDS E- NE3 I`--- -----�� "-----�/ EDMONDS MLT EDMONDS I ZONE ZONE INFLUENT INFLUENT METER AT METER AT WWTP WWTP BHC Consultants, LLC Schematic Flow Diagram Figure 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 - Seattle, Washington 98101 Edmonds I / I Stud 7 c _ 206.505.3400 y NSULTA NTS 206.515.3406(fax) - Edmonds, Washington www.bhcconsultants.com FlaCKet Page 237 o PS PS-7 W-1 / QPs-s PS #1 E 52 �E-52 E-3 City of Woodway E-42- E-40 [0-5 M R-3 City of Lynnwood E-5 E-4 -� E.2 � E-6 E-'--42 E-7 E-7A E-2 7-10-1 O-3 City of Seattle 5 2010.mxd E-1 3 R-1 Basin Delineations Meter 1 Zone 1 Zone 2 Meter A Meter B Meter C Meter E MLT Zone Edmonds Zone LS-1 Zone 3 1 Mountlake Terrace E-9 N OF F'DMn BHC Consultants, LLC W E Basin Delineations Figure . 1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 500 _ Edmonds 1/1 Study 2 _73JI Seattle, WA 98101 r2065053400 S Edmonds, Washington C O N S U LTA N T S 5053406 �° bhc n antsxom Luc. 1890 Not To Scale Table 1 Catchment and Tributary Areas Metering Subarea Area eet ot Aver Dia eet-inc es Inch Uia - Location catchments (acres) pipe* (inches) of pipe Mile of pipe Meter A (MLT) M-1 1593.1 240,355 9.01 2,166,170 410.26 E-9 9.3 1,578 + 28.82 45,478 8.61 Total 1602.4 241,933 2,211,648 418.87 ter B ZSD) R-1 555.0 69,100 8.00 552,800 104 Total 555.0 69,100 552,800 104 ter C ZSD) 0-2 8.3 3,625 + 8.00 29,000 5 R-2 135.0 19,700 8.00 157,600 29 Total 143.3 23,325 186,600 35 Meter D M-2 } Meter E 663.0 49,442 7.78 384,659 72.85 E-1 Zone 2 356.9 54,211 9.50 ^ 515,005 97.54 M-3 1.6 363 23.21 8,425 1.60 E-2 152.8 22,150 7.77 ^ 172,106 32.60 L-3 Meter 1 10.5 93 8.00 744 0.14 E-6 Meter 2 139.8 13,965 7.82 ^ 109,206 20.68 E-7 Meter 2 - Meter 1 62.2 10,000 7.70 ^ 77,000 14.58 0-1 (Zone 1) 238.7 30,273 7.87 ^ 238,249 45.12 E-21 23.4 3,035 7.50 ^ 22,763 4.31 Total 1648.8 183,532 1,528,155 289.42 Ater E M-2 663.0 49,442 7.78 384,760 72 Total 663.0 49,442 384,760 72 Ater 1 E-2 152.8 22,150 7.77 ^ 172,106 32 L-3 10.5 93 8.00 744 0 E-6 139.8 13,965 7.82 ^ 109,206 20 Total 303.1 36,208 282,056 53 Packet Page 289 of 895 Table 1 Catchment and Tributary Areas Metering Subarea Area eet ot Aver Dia eet-inc es Inch Uia - Location catchments (acres) pipe* (inches) of pipe Mile of pipe Meter 2 E-2 152.8 22,150 7.77 ^ 172,106 32.60 L-3 Meter 1 10.5 93 8.00 744 0.14 E-6 139.8 13,965 7.82 ^ 109,206 20.68 E-7 Meter 2 - Meter 1 62.2 10,000 7.70 ^ 77,000 14.58 0-1 (Zone 1) 238.7 30,273 7.87 ^ 238,249 45.12 E-21 23.4 3,035 7.50 ^ 22,763 4.31 Total 627.4 79,516 620,067 117.44 Meter 3 M-1 E-9 Basin A 1593.1 9.3 240,355 1,578 + 9.01 28.82 ^ 2,166,170 45,478 410.26 8.61 R-1 Basin B 555.0 69,100 8.00 552,800 104.70 0-2 R-2 Basin C 8.3 135.0 3,625 + 19,700 8.00 8.00 29,000 157,600 5.49 29.85 M-2 Meter E 663.0 49,442 7.78 384,659 72.85 E-1 M-3 Zone 2 356.9 54,211 9.50 ^ 515,005 97.54 1.6 363 23.21 8,425 1.60 E-2 152.8 22,150 7.77 ^ 172,106 32.60 L-3 Meter 1 Meter D 10.5 93 8.00 744 0.14 E-6 E-7 0-1 E-21 Meter 2 Meter 2 -Meter 1 (Zone 1) 139.8 13,965 7.82 ^ 109,206 20.68 62.2 10,000 7.70 ^ 77,000 14.58 238.7 30,273 7.87 ^ 238,249 45.12 23.4 3,035 7.50 ^ 22,763 4.31 Total 3949.5 517,890 4,479,203 848.33 Station No. 1 E-5 1035.6 166,209 7.98 ^ 1,326,348 251. PS #2 LS-01 12.0 1,526 8.43 12,864 2. PS #3 59.0 7,125 7.29 ^ 51,941 9. Total 1106.6 174,860 1,391,153 263. monds Meter E-5 1035.6 166,209 7.98 ^ 1,326,348 251. PS #2 PS #1 12.0 1,526 8.43 12,864 2. PS #3 59.0 7,125 7.29 ^ 51,941 9. Packet Page 290 of 895 Table 1 Catchment and Tributary Areas Metering Subarea Area Feet of Aver Dia Feet -inches Inch Dia - Location catchments (acres) pipe* (inches) of pipe Mile of pipe E-4 1009.3 165,043 8.30 ^ 1,369,857 259.44 E-40 81.8 11,505 7.24 ^ 83,296 15.78 0-5 Edmonds Zone 24.5 3,865 8.00 ^ 30,920 5.86 E-52 156.2 27,288 8.11 ^ 221,306 41.91 PS #7 130.7 4,007 7.27 ^ 29,131 5.52 13.3 1,616 14.14 ^ 22,850 4.33 PS #8 Total 2522.4 388,184 3,148,513 596.31 MILT Meter M-1 Basin A 1593.1 240,355 9.01 2,166,170 410.26 E-9 9.3 1,578 + 28.82 ^ 45,478 8.61 R-1 Basin B 555.0 69,100 8.00 552,800 104.70 0-2 Basin C 8.3 3,625 + 8.00 29,000 5.49 R-2 r 135.0 19,700 8.00 157,600 29.85 M-2 Meter E 663.0 49,442 7.78 384,659 72.85 E-1 Zone 2 356.9 Meter 3 54,211 9.50 ^ 515,005 97.54 M-3 1.6 363 23.21 8,425 1.60 E-2 152.8 22,150 7.77 ^ 172,106 32.60 L-3 Meter 1 eter D 10.5 93 8.00 744 0.14 E-6 Meter 2 139.8 13,965 7.82 ^ 109,206 20.68 E-7 Meter 2 - Meter 1 62.2 10,000 7.70 ^ 77,000 14.58 0-1 (Zone 1) 238.7 30,273 7.87 ^ 238,249 45.12 E-21 23.4 3,035 7.50 ^ 22,763 4.31 E-7A 1.5 171 8.00 1,368 0.26 E-42 39.2 3,753 7.99 29,986 5.68 0-3 604.1 88,995 9.03 ^ 803,625 152.20 W-1 155.4 10,911 8.00 ^ 87,288 16.53 W-2 MLT Zone 28.0 2,081 8.00 ^ 16,648 3.15 E-3 146.9 23,872 13.39 ^ 319,646 60.54 0-4 543.4 73,430 7.99 ^ 586,706 111.12 R-3 14.3 895 8.00 ^ 7,160 1.36 HS 41.1 - - Total 5523.5 721,998 6,331,630 1,199.17 * Includes mainline only, no side sewers or laterals included + Estimated length of pipe Estimated pipe diameter to be 8" when no other information was available Packet Page 291 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study III. Rainfall and Flow Data Reduction The City's continuous flow meter readings for certain catchment areas, pump run records for the stations tributary to the City's WWTP and rainfall data as collected at the WWTP forms the basis for this analysis. Flow and rainfall data for the period beginning in June 2006 and ending in December of 2008 were reviewed for all 10 flow meters and Lift Station 1. All rainfall data was reviewed in order to capsulate and segregate four flow and climatic conditions. Specifically the goal was to capture the following scenarios: • Dry weather flow during a period of low groundwater. This condition reflects our baseline domestic flows with little or no infiltration or inflow • Minimal rain during a high groundwater period. This condition was intended to capture and reflect infiltration coming from the groundwater without a significant inflow component. • Significant wet weather storm following a generally wet period. This set of circumstances captures inflow component when the groundwater is already elevated. • Significant winter storm following a relative dry period. This was intended to identify the inflow component. The following time periods were selected to satisfy the conditions presented above: • August 2008. The period was identified as a period of no or very little rain (low groundwater levels) leading up to August 18-20, 2008. • April 2008. This time period was selected because of the sustained wet period through the spring of 2008. The supposition is that the groundwater level was elevated and sources of infiltration would manifest itself in similarly elevated base flows. • December 25-30 2006. This time period contained the last of a series of "typical" December rain events. This rain event produced 1.39 inches of rain at the Edmonds WWTP on December 26-27. • December 2-5, 2007. This was a significant rainfall event that produced 5.65 inches of rain at the WWTP between December 2nd and December 5t". This rain event led to widespread flooding and surcharging throughout the western Washington area. Some accounts have labeled this storm as a 50 year event. Rainfall and flow data for these four storms for all 10 meters and Lift Station #1 were prepared and included in Appendix A. The flow data from the drainage basin meters was reduced from 5 minute increments to hourly flow totals. Hourly rainfall data was prepared from data gathered from the rain gauge at the Edmonds WWTP. -9- Packet Page 292 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study The baseline flow data (i.e. no rain with low groundwater levels) of August 2008 show regular diurnal flow patterns and slight reaction to moderate summer showers. It is also interesting to note the variance between the weekend and weekday flow patterns. Weekend diurnal flow patterns tend to be slightly delayed and slightly higher than that seen during weekdays. This pattern is reflective of residents being at home on the weekends. The April 2008 flow patterns show the same diurnal and weekend/weekday patterns as described above, however, the baseline is increased due to the higher groundwater levels. The response to the April 5th storm was immediate, but the baseline flows quickly returned to pre -storm levels. Minor storms that extended for approximately a day resulted in a response that quickly returned to baseline at the conclusion of the rain event. The basins appear to be insensitive to isolated and small showers. The December 25th through 30th 2006 storms resulted in a significant response in increased flows at every metering station. The antecedent rainfall preceding December 25th delivered a significant amount of rain to the system. Rainfall continued through December 27th after which all rainfall ceased. The system slowly returned to normal over the course of the following five days. The volume of water delivered during the December 2nd through 5th 2007 storm was unique in that the preceding period was very dry, but the storm was very intense for a two day period. The response was immediate, returning to pre - storm conditions over the course of two to three days. Storms later in that same month were characterized by a gradual increase in the baseline. IV. Presentation of Historical Data The measurement of 1/1 in terms of gallons per day per acre (gpad) and gallons per day per inch -diameter -mile (gpdpidm) was determined by calculating the average flows for the time period in question. For instance, the flow value for April and August were the average flows for the entire month. The average flow for the December 25th through 30th was the average for that six day period and similarly the average flow for the December 2nd through the 5th was determined by taking the total flow for that four day period and deriving the average for that period. Those respective values were then divided by the total acreage for gpad and by the total inch -diameter -miles for gpdpidm. The results of those calculations are presented in Table 2. Table 2 also includes the average dry weather flows and the peak hour flows for the April and December storms. - 10- Packet Page 293 of 895 Table 2 Basin Values Gallons/acre/day Gallons/day/inch-diameter-mile Flow, m d Basin/ Meter August 2008 April 2008 December 25-30, 2006 December 2-5, 2007 August 2008 April 2008 December 25 30, 2006 December 2-5, 2007 Average Dry Month Peak Hour April 2008 Dec 2006 Dec 2007 1 489 542 971 1,255 2,776 3,073 5,506 7,117 0.15 0.28 0.58 0.98 2 406 560 1,468 2,055 2,170 2,992 7,843 10,980 0.25 0.69 1.90 2.52 3 606 767 1,559 2,042 2,823 3,570 7,256 9,508 0.89 6.13 6.83 6.56 A 439 662 1,570 1,661 1,681 2,534 6,006 6,353 0.70 2.05 4.25 4.78 B 381 483 1,077 1,693 2,022 2,558 5,712 8,974 0.21 0.57 1.21 2.19 C 502 924 2,413 2,844 2,037 3,749 9,786 11,531 0.07 0.27 0.68 1.13 D 805 939 1,574 1,954 4,587 5,348 8,966 11,134 1.33 3.24 4.81 5.74 910 1,049 1,361 1,529 8,280 9,545 12,380 13,908 0.60 1.64 2.07 2.53 MILT at WWTP 292 767 1,021 903 1,343 3,535 4,701 4,158 1.44 7.50 8.35 9.76 LS-01 497 616 1,518 1,856 1,557 2,847 5,816 8,289 0.55 1.71 2.90 2.90 Edmonds at WWTP 605 737 1,499 1,968 2,560 3,116 6,341 8,324 1.49 4.55 14.02 11.59 (Metereter 1) Zone 2 (Meter D-Meter E- Meter 2) 329 577 1,933 2,804 1,524 4,826 2,830 1,560 2,924 5,055 3,409 2,222 9,791 14,202 0.11 0.47 0.94 0.55 0.41 0.91 2.84 1.37 1.32 1.54 1,309 665 1,398 2,153 2,566 1,976 1,125 7,787 6,055 4,142 9,279 0.84 0.69 8.69 3.20 Edmonds Zone (EdMeter-LS-01) 801 1,423 8,404 11.12 MLT Zone (MLT Meter -Meter 3) 357 508 948 4,918 1.52 Packet Page 294 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study It is interesting to note that King County and other agencies have frequently used the measurement of gallons per acre per day to determine excessiveness of 1/1. In fact, King County has used this measurement since 1961 with their component agencies that are tributary to their system. The threshold value permitted by their interlocal agreement is set at 1,100 gpad. During the County's Regional 1/1 program more than 800 flow meters were installed to measure the 1/1 values. Of those measured basins only a few dozen basins met the 1,100 gpad maximum allowable threshold. As a result the County considered, but has not yet adopted, a revised threshold of 1,500 gpad. The measurement of that threshold is generally defined as the flow volumes for any 30-minute period that exceeds 1,100 gpad. The values presented in Table 3 represent the calculated volume of 1/1 in excess of the summertime, dry weather baseline flows. This volume of 1/1 was determined by subtracting the August 2008 flows from the April 2008, December 2006 and December 2007 flows. This net increase in flows was the additional 1/1 components based on an average day, not the 30-minute event. The larger sub -basins (Zone 1, Zone 2, MILT Zone, and Edmonds Zone) results were calculated by subtracting meter data and dividing by sub basin area or inch - diameter mile data for the sub -basin. When a subtraction process is used to determine results for a sub -basin, each meter subtraction reduces the reliability of the data. It should be noted that the data shown for the MILT meter at the treatment plant do not take into account the additional flows from the Ballinger pump station that is routed to the King County treatment system. The data is presented this way solely to facilitate the calculation of the results for the MLT Zone. Average daily flows in August 2008 are assumed to be baseline domestic wastewater flows in all basins. Because average daily flow in April 2008 appears relatively insensitive to the minor rain events, the April 2008 flows were assumed to have the baseline wastewater flow plus the volume of infiltration water. Average daily August waste water flow was subtracted from average daily wastewater flow in April of 2008 to obtain the average daily flow of infiltration water. This was done for all metered basins. Additionally, August 2008 flows were subtracted from the December 2006 and December 2007 storms in order to estimate the total inflow and infiltration. The results of these calculations are shown in Table 3. Peaking factors were calculated for April 2008, December 2007, and December 2006 rain events. The peaking factors were calculated using two sets of data. The first set was a peaking factor derived by dividing average gallon per acre -day flow by the August 2008 corresponding value. The second set of peaking factors was determined by taking the average dry weather flow divided into the peak hour flows for the April and December storms. These results are shown in Table 4. -12- Packet Page 295 of 895 Table 3 1/1 Values Basin / Meter Gallons/acre/day Gallons/in-mile-day April 2008 August 2008 December 2006 - August 2008 December 2007 - August 2008 April 2008 August 2008 December 2006 - August 2008 December 2007 - August 2008 1 52 481 765 296 2,730 4,341 2 154 1,062 1,649 822 5,672 8,810 3 161 952 1,436 747 4,434 6,685 223 1,131 1,221 853 4,325 4,672 101 696 1,312 536 3,690 6,952 422 1,911 2,341 1,711 7,749 9,494 D 134 139 769 451 1,149 619 761 1,265 4,379 4,100 6,547 5,628 MILT at WWTP 476 729 611 2,192 3,358 2,815 LS-01 118 1,021 1,359 1,291 4,259 6,732 Edmonds at WWTP 131 894 1,363 556 3,781 5,764 Zone 1 to Zone 2 (Meter D- Meter E- Meter 2) 249 1,604 844 758 591 2,475 1,256 1,310 769 1,400 8,267 2,961 3,225 2,583 12,678 88 136 151 229 579 662 4,453 5,574 3,358 Edmonds Zone (EdMeter - LS-01) MLT Zone (MLT Meter - Meter 3) Packet Page 296 of 895 Table 4 1/1 Peaking Factors Ratio of 1/1 values (gpad) Ratio of Peak Flows Basin / Meter April 2008 / August 2008 December 2006 / August 2008 December 2007 / August 2008 April 2008 / August 2008 December 2006 / August 2008 December 2007 / August 2008 1 1.1 2.0 2.6 1.9 3.9 6.5 2 1.4 3.6 5.1 2.7 7.5 9.9 3 1.3 2.6 3.4 6.9 7.7 7.4 A 1.5 3.6 3.8 2.9 6.0 6.8 B 1.3 2.8 4.4 2.7 5.7 10.4 1.8 4.8 5.7 3.7 9.4 15.7 D 1.2 2.0 2.4 2.4 3.6 4.3 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.7 3.4 4.2 MILT at WWTP 2.6 3.5 3.1 5.2 5.8 6.8 LS-01 1.2 3.1 3.7 3.1 5.3 5.3 Edmonds at WWTP 1.2 2.5 3.3 3.1 9.4 7.8 1.8 5.9 8.5 3.9 12.4 13.1 Meter- Meter Zone 2 (Meter D- Meter E- Meter 2) 1.1 1.6 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.5 Edmonds Zone (EdMeter - LS-01) 1.2 1.4 2.1 3.0 3.0 11.8 9.2 MLT Zone (MILT Meter - Meter 3) 2.7 3.2 2.5 2.8 5.8 Packet Page 297 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study The data presented in Tables 2, 3 and 4 include all flow measurement locations. Some of this data captures flow from several areas. Though the data is reliable, the larger catchment area tends to mask the specific origin and the severity of the 1/1. V. Recommendation for Smoke Testing The following meters and their associated data, include data from combined basins: • Meter 2 • Meter 3 • Meter D • MLT flow meter at the WWTP • Edmonds flow meter at the WWTP Consequently, this data will be used to refine the catchment area by subtracting it from an upstream meter. This means that the data will be used in the following manner. Direct read data: • Meter 1 • Meter A • Meter B • Meter C • Meter E • LS-01 Single basin subtraction: • Zone 1 ( Meter 2 minus Meter 1) • Edmonds Zone (Edmonds meter at WWTP minus LS-01) • MLT Zone (MLT flow meter at WWTP minus Meter 3) Double basin subtractions • Zone 2 (Meter D minus Meter E minus Meter 2) The direct read flow data will generally be considered the most reliable and the single basin subtraction data more reliable than the double basin subtraction data. However, all ten basins will be evaluated. The other variable in analyzing the flow data is restricting the focus to those basins that collect flow only from, or predominately from, City of Edmonds customers. The non -Edmonds collection lines are of interest in determining the worst areas, however, those contract customers (i.e. Ronald S.D., Olympic View and Mountlake Terrace) are charged based on volume of flow delivered to the -15- Packet Page 298 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study Edmond's system. Consequently, the burden and incentive to correct extraneous 1/1 rests with the contract agencies, not the City of Edmonds. With these constraints, the analysis has been confined to those basins that are exclusively or substantially within the City's control and jurisdiction. The following listing defines the percentage of the basin that is owned and controlled by the City of Edmonds: Basin / Meter Percentage within Edmonds jurisdiction • Meter 1 97% • Meter A 0% • Meter C 0% • Meter E 0% • LS-01 100% • Zone 26% • Edmonds Zone 98% • MLT Zone 12% • Zone 2 99% The focus of our evaluation will be on those four basins that largely fall under the control and ownership of Edmonds and to a lesser degree those basins that partially include Edmonds' lines. Specifically this includes basins Meter 1, LS-01, Zone 1, Edmonds Zone, MLT Zone and Zone 2. The 1/1 values and peaking factors are restated in Table 5 for these six basins. A comparison of these six basins seems to point to Zone 1 as having the highest values. The second worst or critical basin is not as easily determined. Basin LS- 01 shows the next worst values in terms of 1/1 volume as measured by the gallons per acre per day, gallons per inch -diameter -mile and the peaking factors associated with those values. Keep in mind that those values are determined based on the average volume of 1/1 over the course of the storm. The other metric is the peaking factor associated with peak flows. Using this metric the Edmonds Zone basin would be considered the next most critical basin. Zone 1 has approximately 43,300 linear feet of pipe; however, LS-01 has nearly 175,000 feet. The rule of thumb that we have found to be a good threshold is to limit the footage of pipe to 20,000 to 40,000 when trying to define the sources through smoke testing. Basins with footage much greater than this range tends to be difficult to trace down the source of 1/1. Smoke testing in Zone 1 seems to be reasonably close to limit and it is expected to identify the individual sources. LS-01, however, is significantly greater than this threshold and is likely to create some challenges in refining the origins of the 1/1 sources. -16- Packet Page 299 of 895 Table 5 1/1 Values and Peaking Factors for Six Edmonds Basins Gallons/acre/ ay Gallons/in-mile-day Peaking factors ad Peaking factors flow Basin / Meter Apr 2008 - Dec 2006 - Dec 2007 - Apr 2008 - Dec 2006 - Dec 2007 - Apr 2008 / Dec 2006 / Dec 2007 / Apr 2008 / Dec 2006 / Dec 2007 / Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 Aug 2008 1 52 118 481 765 296 1,291 2,730 4,341 1.1 2.0 2.6 1.9 3.9 6.5 LS-01 1,021 1,359 4,259 6,732 1.2 3.1 3.7 3.1 5.3 5.3 21475 8,267 12,67 1. 5.9 8.5 3.9 1,604 1,400 Zone 2 (Meter D- Meter E- 88 844 1,256 229 2,961 4,453 1.1 1.6 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.5 Meter 2) Edmonds Zone (EdMeter - LS-01) 136 758 591 1,310 579 3,225 5,574 1.2 2.1 3.0 3.0 11.8 9.2 MLT Zone 151 769 662 2,583 3,358 1.4 2.7 3.2 2.5 2.8 5.8 (MLT Meter - Meter 3) 2nd Worst Basin 3rd Worst Basin Packet Page 300 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study The recommendation of this report is to smoke test Zone 1. It is recognized that only 26% of this basin is under the jurisdiction of the City, but it is a discrete basin with likely identifiable sources of I/I that are tributary to the City's plant. If the City elects to focus their attention to another basin that includes a greater percentage of City infrastructure, then efforts should be directed to Basin LS-01 or the Edmonds Zone basin. VI. Capital Improvement Projects The proposed Capital Improvement List consists of three components: 1. Initial and subsequent smoke testing and resulting CIP 2. Correction of chronic and frequent flooding areas 3. Correction of chronic and routine maintenance efforts Smoke Testing Recommendations and Resulting CIP The recommendation is to smoke test Zone 1. It is clear that only a minor portion of Zone 1 falls within the jurisdiction of the City. However, preliminary discussions with the Olympic View Water and Sewer District (OV) seems to indicate their willingness to perform the smoke testing on their portion of this Zone. OV has experienced some surcharging and localized flooding issues in this same basin. Their interest is two -fold. First to relieve the surcharging conditions and thereby avoid or postpone a capital project for added capacity and secondly to reduce treatment capacity charges to the City. Correction of chronic and frequent flooding areas In addition to the identified 1/1 sources resulting from the smoke testing, the City staff has also identified other known problem areas that frequently surcharge or result in flooding. These reoccurring problems are well known to the City staff. Some of these flooding areas can be resolved with a local CIP project as noted in Table 6. These chronic problem areas are identified below. The corresponding numbers of the descriptions below match with the presentation numbers on Figure 3: 1. 727 Melody Lane, MH 244-8, surcharges and overflows down customers driveway during heavy storms. Preventing overflows at this location will flood houses. Downstream flow constriction will require a basin hydraulic analysis. 2. 1111 Brookmere, MH 265-8, house floods out of basement plumbing and MH surcharges during heavy storms 3. 224t" St. SW & 77 Ave W, MH 4-13, surcharges during hard storms and needs to be bypass pumped into a MH at the end of 77t" Ave W so sewer does not back up into homes on 224t" -18- Packet Page 301 of 895 Table 6 Capital Improvement Projects Category Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Smoke Testing and Resulting CIP Smoke Test Zone 1 (Edmonds portion only) $ 25,000 i CIP from Zone 1 (Edmonds portion only)** $ 700,000 Meter Installations in Basin LS-01 $ 20,000 Smoke Test in Basin LS-01 $ 75,000 CIP in Basin LS-01 ** $ 700,000 Meter Installation in Basin Edmonds Zone $ 20,000 Smoke Testing in Edmonds Zone $ 100,000 CIP in Edmonds Zone ** $ 700,000 Chronic and Frequent Flooding 1 MH 244-8 overflow - downstream hydraulic analysis req'd +++ 2 In -line check valve on side sewer (1111 Brookmere) $ 1,500 3 In -line check valve on side sewer (along 224th) $ 1,500 4 Gasketed ring and cover at MH 48-17 +++ 5 Gasketed ring and cover at MH 224-9 +++ 6 Gasketed ring and cover at MH 15 and 16 $ 1,500 7 Gasketed ring and cover at MH 298 and 299 $ 1,500 8 Flow meter at MH 152A-13 $ 20,000 9 Gasketed ring and cover (or rainstop) at MH 80-2 $ 1,500 Reoccuring Maintenance Issues 1 7117 176d' Street SW. 30 foot belly and 150 feet of roots $ 100,000 2 8015 196d' Street SW. Sixty feet of 6-inch line. $ 30,000 3 465 Admiral Way. 1500 feet of 8-inch line. $ 750,000 4 1053 Alder Street. 330 feet of 8-inch line. $ 170,000 5 949 Alder St. 600 feet of 8-inch line. Also see Comprehensive Sewer Plan Problem 7 $ 35,000 $ 345,000 6 Pine Ridge Park, 8610 Main St, 8529 Main St and 8400 204' St SW. 1,325 feet 8- and 10-inch line. $ 650,000 7 7703 203rd Street. 700 feet of 8-inch line. $ 350,000 8 8705 Maplewood Ln. 350 feet of 8-inch line. $ 175,000 9 7122 210' St. 300 feet of 8-inch line. $ 150,000 10 9126 Bowdoin St. 120 feet of 6-inch lateral. $ 60,000 11 7313 228' St SW. 350 feet of 8-inch line $ 175,000 12 7530 242"d PI SW. 350 feet of 8-inch line $ 175,000 13 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan — Problem 11. On 224th St at 76th Ave. 800 feet of 8-inch pipe $ 30,000 $ 290,000 Packet Page 302 of 895 Table 6 Capital Improvement Projects Category Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 14 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 12. On Beach at Dayton St. Approximately 350 feet of 6-inch pipe replaced with 8-inch $ 15,000 $ 155,000 15 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 18. On 8`h Ave S between Fir and Elm St. 600 feet of 8-inch line $ 26,000 $ 234,000 16 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 19. On Hemlock St. 800 feet of 8-inch line $ 40,000 $ 365,000 17 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 20. On 7th Ave N. 500 feet of 8-inch line $ 50,000 $ 450,000 18 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 21. On Dellwood Dr. 500 feet of 8-inch line $ 20,000 $ 200,000 19 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 22. On 72nd Ave W. 500 feet of 8-inch line $ 25,000 $ 225,000 20 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 23. On 76t' Ave W. 500 feet of 8-inch line $ 25,000 $ 225,000 21 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 24. On 200' St SW. 250 feet of 8-inch line $ 20,000 $ 225,000 22 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 25. On 216th St SW. 350 feet of 8-inch line $ 15,000 $ 155,000 23 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 26. On Walnut at 96th Ave. 1000 feet of 8-inch line $ 45,000 $ 405,000 24 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 27. On Northwest Traction right-of-way. 700 feet of 8-inch line $ 30,000 $ 330,000 25 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 28. On 76th Ave W. 150 feet of 8-inch line $ 5,000 $ 80,000 26 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 29. On 240' St SW. 250 feet of 8-inch line $ 10,000 $ 120,000 27 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 30. On 238'h St SW. 800 feet of 8-inch line $ 40,000 $ 390,000 28 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 31. Off of Olympic View Dr at 761h Ave. 400 feet of 8-inch line $ 250,000 TOTAL $25,000 $803,000 $1,214,000 $1,975,500 $810,000 $2,125,000 $1,340,000 $1,735,000 ** Placeholder amount. Final amount is dependent on results of the smoke testing. +++ Downstream Hydraulic Analysis required to prevent surcharging at this MH. Packet Page 303 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study 4. 23615 74" Ave W, MH 48-17, when lake rises during hard storms the manhole surcharges flowing sewage into the lake, then takes inflow from the lake into the manhole as the lake rises over the manhole and the sewer recedes in the main line. Preventing overflows at this location will flood houses. Downstream flow constriction will require a basin hydraulic analysis. 5. 20830 Woodlake Dr., MH 224-9, pond rises and MH goes under water backing sewage out of a cleanout at 20830. Preventing overflows at this location will flood houses. Downstream flow constriction will require a basin hydraulic analysis. 6. Between SR104 and Railroad Ave. on Dayton, MH 15 & 16 flood when the street floods during hard storms. 7. 832 and 828 Cary Rd., MH 298-8 and 299-8 go under water during hard storms when the creek floods. 8. MH 152A-13 (between 82nd and 83rd Avenue on 220t" Street) could use a flow meter to calculate flows going into the Olympic View service area to see if we are contributing to their high flows on 224t" and 77t" Ave W. 9. MH 80-2, MH 78-2, 8403 and 8307 Talbot Rd. Manholes under water during storms. Correction of chronic and routine maintenance efforts There are dozens of regular and reoccurring maintenance efforts throughout the City. These areas include those pipe segments that are on the City's routine maintenance schedule and might include flushing of the lines that have sags in the alignment, root intrusion and grease accumulations. The City staff has characterized these chronic areas as the Red Area problems (which are the highest priority) and the Root Zone which require attention but generally on a less frequent basis. These areas are graphically presented on Figure 3. The following are a brief description of the Red Area problems, corresponding numbers are shown on Figure 3. Problem areas 1 through 12 were collected from the maintenance staff and problems 13 through 26 were included in the previous Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. 1. 7117 176t" Street SW. Thirty foot belly and 150 feet of roots (Sheet 3-93 to Sheet 3-94 c/o). 2. 8015 196t" Street SW. Sixty feet of 6-inch line with belly and sag (Sheet 5-334A). 3. 465 Admiral Way. Approximately 1500 feet of 8-inch line beginning at MH 2 through MH 6 with bellies, flat grade and grease accumulations (Sheet 7). 4. 1053 Alder Street. 330 feet of 8-inch line with flat grade and bellies (Sheet 8-32B to Sheet 12-2 and Sheet 8-32A to Sheet 8-32B). -22- Packet Page 305 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study 5. 949 Alder Street. Approximately 600 feet of 8-inch line with flat grades and bellies (Sheet 8-30 to Sheet 8-31 and Sheet 8-31 to Sheet 8-32). Also refer to Comprehensive Sewer Plan Problem 7. 6. Pine Ridge Park area, 8610 Main Street, 8529 Main Street and 8400 204th Street SW. Approximately 1,325 feet 8- and 10-inch line. Manholes 9-18, 9-19, 9-20, 9-201, 9-202 and 9-224. 7. 7703 203rd Street. Approximately 700 feet of 8-inch line with bellies and flat grade (Sheet 9-314 to Sheet 9-313 and Sheet 9-366 Sheet 9-314). 8. 8705 Maplewood Lane. Approximately 350 feet of 8-inch line with bellies and flat grade (Sheet 9-137 to Sheet 9-138). 9. 7122 210th Street. Approximately 300 feet of 8-inch line with bellies and grease accumulation (Sheet 10-23 to Sheet 10-25). 10. 9126 Bowdoin Street. Approximately 120 feet of 6-inch lateral with flat grade and root intrusion. 11. 7313 228th Street SW. Approximately 350 feet of 8-inch line with bellies (Sheet 14-65 to Sheet 14-66). 12. 7530 242nd PI SW. Approximately 350 feet of 8-inch line with bellies (Sheet 17-81 to Sheet 17-80). 13. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 11. On 224th at the intersection with 76th Avenue. Approximately 800 feet of 8-inch pipe. 14. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 12.On Beach Place at the intersection with Dayton Street. Replace approximately 350 feet of 6-inch line with 8-inch pipe. 15. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 18. On 8th Avenue South between Fir and Elm Street. Approximately 600 feet of 8-inch line with flat grade. 16. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 19. On Hemlock Street. Approximately 800 feet of 8-inch line with numerous bellies. 17. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 20. On Seventh Avenue North. Approximately 500 feet of 8-inch line with numerous bellies. 18. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 21. On Dellwood Drive. Approximately 500 feet of 8-inch line with numerous bellies and accumulation of grease. 19. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 22. On 72nd Avenue West. Approximately 500 feet of 8-inch line with numerous bellies and accumulation of grease. 20. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 23. On 76th Avenue West. Approximately 500 feet of 8-inch line with numerous bellies and accumulation of grease. 21. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 24. On 200th Street SW. Approximately 250 feet of 8-inch line with numerous bellies, flat grade and accumulation of solids. 22. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan - Problem 25. On 216th Street SW. Approximately 350 feet of 8-inch line with numerous bellies and accumulation of grease. - 23 - Packet Page 306 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study 23. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan — Problem 26. On Walnut between 96t" Avenue and 9t" Avenue South. Approximately 1000 feet of 8-inch line with flat grade and accumulation of solids. 24. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan — Problem 27. On Northwest Traction right-of-way. Approximately 700 feet of 8-inch line with flat grade, bellies and accumulation of solids and grease. 25. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan — Problem 28. On 76t" Avenue West. Approximately 150 feet of 8-inch line with flat grade. 26. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan — Problem 29. On 240t" Street SW. Approximately 250 feet of 8-inch line with bellies and grease accumulation. 27. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan — Problem 30. On 238t" Street SW. Approximately 800 feet of 8-inch line with bellies and grease accumulation. 28. Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan — Problem 31. Off of Olympic View Drive at 76t" Avenue. Approximately 400 feet of 8-inch line with bellies and root intrusion. VII. Proposed Standards, Policies and Guidelines The proposed standards, policies and guidelines described herein address a wide range of topics, including sewer evaluations, connections to side sewers, pipeline and manhole leak inspections, system maintenance, and construction practices and materials for 1/1 control projects. They are intended to: • Guide the engineering and construction of future system infrastructure (both new and rehabilitated) to achieve long-term 1/1 control • Limit system degradation and 1/1 increases over time Some of the subjects covered are as follows: • Establish proper construction practices and materials for 1/1 repair and rehabilitation projects • Encourage appropriate inspection and testing prior to acceptance of new or rehabilitated sections of sewer • Develop inspection and repair standards for new and existing structures on private property • Encourage appropriate system maintenance -24- Packet Page 307 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study • Provide appropriate predesign, investigation of 1/1 conditions, inspection of construction, and enforcement of standards. The proposed standards, policies and guidelines address only features of the public and private sewer systems associated with 1/I. They are intended to augment and emphasize individual City standards which outline requirements for overall sewer system design, construction and rehabilitation. A total of 33 Standards, 17 Policies and 7 Guidelines have been developed for the City's consideration in formulating an effective, on -going 1/1 Control Program for City-wide implementation as needed. They are derived from a set of similar draft requirements prepared for King County under its Regional 1/1 Control Program. The County's draft standards and policies reflect extensive input from the Engineering & Planning Subcommittee of the Metropolitan Water Pollution Abatement Advisory Committee (MWPAAC), of which the City of Edmonds is one of the 34 member agencies. Funding Options While the overall objective of an 1/1 program would be reduction of capital and O&M costs, with the potential reduction in rates, options for ensuring compliance with 1/1 standards include whether or not surcharges or incentives should be established. Surcharges are an additional fee that could be charged to City customers for exceeding a predetermined 1/1 threshold or for causing increased costs related to conveying and treating 1/I. Incentives provide financial rewards, in the form of lower rates or rebates, to City customers for reducing 1/1 flow. Cost sharing can spread the cost of a project among the City, State and Ratepayers through a variety of options. Private Property The cost and potential disruption associated with reducing 1/1 from private property sources are considerable and affect the ability and willingness of property owners to undertake corrective actions. There are also constraints, including issues of legality and equity that the City must address if public funding is used to defray some or all of the cost of private sewer rehabilitation. Public Education Experience elsewhere indicates that property owner participation increases with knowledge about 1/1 and its impacts on the cost of wastewater conveyance, -25- Packet Page 308 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study treatment and disposal. Implementation of an 1/1 reduction/control program, especially as it includes private property and/or rate issues, necessitates some amount of public education and involvement. PROPOSED STANDARDS, POLICIES & GUIDELINES Each standard, policy or guideline is listed in Appendix B, and consists of the following: • Title — A brief name of the Standard • Control Measure Description — A description of why the Standard is being proposed • Standard/Policy/Guideline — A description in sufficient detail for engineers and City representatives to compare with existing standards • Potential City Impacts — Indicates the potential impact on the City, including additional staffing requirements and other aspects of daily operations. Elements that could add or reduce costs to normal processes are listed. • Potential Impacts to Ratepayers — Indicates potential impact to Ratepayers on private property. Elements that could add or reduce costs to normal processes are listed. The following table provides a summary and brief description of the proposed Standards, Policies and Guidelines (See Appendix B for a detailed description of the proposed action). SUMMARY OF PROPOSED STANDARDS, POLICIES & GUIDELINES Number Title Rehab Both New & Projects Only Rehab STANDARDS Standard 1 Storm Drainage Connections to the Sanitary Sewer Standard 2 Connections to Existing System Standard 3 Allowable Connections to Side Sewers Standard 4 Visual Inspection of Manholes for SSES Investigations -26- Packet Page 309 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study Number Title Rehab Both New & Projects Only Rehab Standard 5 Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection of Sewers for SSES Investigation Standard 6 Smoke Testing for SSES _ I V Investigations Standard 7 Dye Testing for SSES _ I V Investigations Standard 8 Design Capacity for Pipeline Rehabilitation Projects Standard 9 Pipe Anchoring Standard 10 Manhole Location & _ I Covers V Standard 11 Manhole Size Standard 12 Sewer System Design J Standard 13 Manhole Joints Standard 14 Side Sewer Connection _ I Location & Taps V Standard 15 Abandonment _ I Requirements V Standard 16 Pipe Materials Standard 17 Pipe Rehabilitation Methods Standard 18 Inspection Wyes / Cleanouts Standard 19 Inspection of Pipe Installation & Backfill Standard 20 Pipe Zone Bedding & Trench Backfill Standard 21 Manhole Leveling Rings v Standard 22 Root Intrusion Standard 23 Root Intrusion (Private Property) Standard 24 Pipeline Leak Testing Standard 25 Side Sewer Visual Inspection Standard 26 Side Sewer/Lateral Leak Testing Standard 27 Manhole Leak Testing -27- Packet Page 310 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study Number Title Rehab Both New & Projects Only Rehab Standard 28 Product Specific Inspection Standard 29 Product Specific Inspection (Private Property) Standard 30 CCTV Inspection Standard 31 Side Sewer CCTV Requirements Standard 32 Certification, Warranty & Qualifications Standard 33 Bonding & Warranty _ I V Inspections POLICIES Policy 1 Public Awareness of I/I: Educational Materials Policy 2 Responsibility for Community Policy 3 Public Funding for 1/1 _ I Reduction Projects V Policy 4 Rates, Incentives & Surcharges Policy 5 Cost Sharing Policy 6 Storm Water Drainage Ordinances Policy 7 Responsibility for Storm Water Drainage Policy 8 Infeasible or Prohibitively Expensive 1I Modifications Policy 9 Contractor Qualifications Policy 10 Required Permits Policy 11 Inspection Training Policy 12 Property Restoration Policy 13 Bonding, Licensing, Insurance and Warranty Provisions Policy 14 Access to Private _ I Property V Policy 15 Limiting Liability Policy 16 Legislative Action Requirements Packet Page 311 of 895 Inflow / Infiltration Study Number Title Rehab Both New & Projects Only Rehab Policy 17 Side Sewer Ownership & Responsibility GUIDELINES Guideline1 Modeling and Engineering Analysis _ 1 V Guideline 2 Lateral and Side Sewer Rehabilitation Methods Guideline 3 Pipe Protection / Depth of Cover Guideline 4 Manhole Rehabilitation Guideline 5 Spot Repairs Guideline 6 Spot Repairs (Private Property) _ I V Guideline 7 Manhole Lids/Inserts Adoption of these standards, policies and guidelines should be prioritized to facilitate a systematic incorporation of the governance surrounding these 1/1 issues. Table 7 that follows has divided the standards, policies and guidelines into five categories: 1. Public Education 2. Implementation 3. Planning and Design 4. New Construction 5. Existing Facilities It is recommended that those standards, policies and guidelines that are bolded and shaded should be incorporated first. -29- Packet Page 312 of 895 Table 7 Prioritzation of Standards, Policies and Guidelines Major Category Application Item No. 1/1 Reduction City Staffing Potential Impact EDUCATION All 1 Public Awareness: Educational Materials Long Term Low P2 Responsibility for Community Education Public Funding for I/I Reduction Projects Long Term Low IMPLEMENTATION All P3 (COUNCIL ACTION) P4 Rates, Incentives &Surcharges Medium P17 Side Sewer Ownership & Responsibility P5 Cost Sharing Contractor Qualifications PLANNING/DESIGN All P9 Long Term P11 Inspection Training Medium P6 Stormwater Drainage Ordinances P10 Required Permits P16 Legislative Action Requirements NEW CONSTRUCTION All S19 Inspection of Pipe Installation & Backfill Long Term Low S32 Certification, Warranty & Qualifications Long Term Low P7 Responsibility for Stormwater Drainage S9 Pipe Anchoring S16 Pipe Materials PUBLIC Only S24 Pipeline Leak Testing Long Term Low S27 Manhole Leak Testing Long Term Low S30 CCTV Inspection Long Term Medium S1 Storm Drainage Connections to Sanitary Sewer Long Term Low G1 Modeling & Engineering Analysis S10 Manhole Location & Covers S11 Manhole Size S12 Sewer System Design S13 Manhole Joints S21 Manhole Leveling Rings S28 Product Specific Inspection PRIVATE Only S3 Allowable Connections to Side Sewers Long Term Medium S14 Side Sewer Connection Location & Taps Low S20 Pipe Zone Bedding & Trench Backfill Long Term Low S25 Side Sewer Visual Inspection Low S26 Side Sewer/Lateral Leak Testing Long Term S31 Side Sewer CCTV Requirements Long Term Low P8 Infeasible or Prohibitively Expensive Modifications S18 Inspection Wyes/Cleanouts G3 Pipe Protection/Depth of Cover S29 Product Specific Inspection (Private Property) S33 Bonding & Warranty Inspections EXISTING CONSTRUCTION All S5 CCTV Inspection of Sewers for SSES Long Term Low S6 Smoke Testing for SSES Low S7 Dye Testing for SSES Low S19 _ Inspection of Pipe Installation & Backfill Long Term Low P7 Responsibility for Storm Drainage P13 Bonding, Licensing, Insurance & Warranty S8 Design Capacity for Pipeline Rehab Projects S15 Abandonment Requirements S16 Pipe Materials S17 Pipe Rehabilitation Methods S22 Root Intrusion S32 Certification, Warranty & Qualifications Connections to Existing Systems PUBLIC Only S2 G5 Spot Repairs Medium Low S24 Pipeline Leak Testing Long Term S30 CCTV Inspection Long Term Medium S4 Visual Inspection of Maholes for SSES G1 Modeling & Engineering Analysis G4 Manhole Rehabilitation S21 Manhole Leveling Rings G7 Manhole Lids/Inserts S28 Product Specific Inspection Access to Private Property Low PRIVATE Only P14 S3 Allowable Connections to Side Sewers Long Term Medium S14 Side Sewer Connection Location & Taps Low S20 Pipe Zone Bedding & Trench Backfill Long Term Low S31 Side Sewer CCTV Requirements hllllllllllllllligrm Low P8 Infeasible or Prohibitively Expensive Modifications P12 Property Restoration P15 Limiting Liability G2 Lateral & Side Sewer Rehabilitation Methods S18 Inspection Wyes/Cleanouts G3 Pipe Protection/Depth of Cover G6 Spot Repairs (Private Property) S33 Bonding & Warranty Inspections Packet Page 313 of 895 /_1»01LelKCl Flow Data from August 2008, April 2008, December 2006 and December 2007 Meter 1 Meter 2 Meter 3 Meter A Meter B Meter C Meter D Meter E Edmonds Meter MLT Meter Lift Station No. 1 Packet Page 314 of 895 Meter 1 August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 315 of 895 Meter 1 August 2008 Flow and Rainfall 0.7 0.00 0.05 0.6 0.10 0.5 0.15 0 0.4 C7 0.20 3 � U- 0.3 0.25 0.30 0.2 0.35 0.1 0.40 0.45 0.0 8/1 /08 8/6/08 8/11 /08 8/16/08 8/21 /08 8/26/08 8/31 /08 9/5/08 Date/Time Packet Page 316 of 895 Meter 1 April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 0.7 0.00 0.05 0.6 0.10 0.5 0.15 G 0Cu �- c 0.4 0.20 4- •S L 0.3 0.25 0.30 0.2 0.35 0.1 0.40 0.0 0.45 4/1/08 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 4/26/08 5/1/08 Date/Tim e Packet Page 317 of 895 1.2 1.0 W 0.4 0.2 0.0 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 Meter 1 December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 12/16/06 12/21 /06 Date/Time 12/26/06 12/31 /06 IIXIII7 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 c c 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 1 /5/07 Packet Page 318 of 895 1.2 1.0 A: 0.4 0.2 0.0 '1 12/1 /07 12/6/07 12/11 /07 Meter 1 December 2007 Flow and Rainfall 12/16/07 12/21 /07 Date/Time 12/26/07 12/31 /07 11111I17 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 c JT c 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 ' 0.45 1 /5/08 Packet Page 319 of 895 Meter 2 August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 320 of 895 Meter 2 August 2008 Flow and Rainfall 1.20 0 0.05 1.00 0.1 0.80 Ik 0.15 0 0.2 c 0 0.60 3 � 0.25 0.40 0.3 0.35 0.20 0.4 0.00 0.45 8/1 /08 8/6/08 8/11 /08 8/16/08 8/21 /08 8/26/08 8/31 /08 9/5/08 Date/Time Packet Page 321 of 895 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 0 0.5 3 0 LL 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 4/1 /08 Meter 2 April 2008 flow and Rainfall 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 Date/Time 4/26/08 5/1 /08 A 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 c 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 ' 0.45 5/6/08 Packet Page 322 of 895 011111 2.50 r IR W1111 0.50 0.00 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 Meter 2 December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 12/16/06 12/21 /06 12/26/06 Date/Time 12/31 /06 It 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 c JT c 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 ' 0.45 1 /5/07 Packet Page 323 of 895 Meter 2 December 2007 Flow and Rainfall 3.00 it 0 T771 0.05 2.50 0.1 2.00 0.15 G 0.2 c 0 1.50 3 = U- 0.25 1.00 0.3 0.35 0.50 0.4 0.00 0.45 12/1 /07 12/6/07 12/11 /07 12/16/07 12/21 /07 12/26/07 12/31 /07 1 /5/08 Date/Time Packet Page 324 of 895 Meter 3 August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 325 of 895 1.2 1 M G 0 0.6 3 0 U- 0.4 0.2 0 8/1 /08 8/6/08 8/11/08 Meter 3 August 2008 Flow and Rainfall 8/16/08 8/21/08 Date/Time 8/26/08 8/31 /08 W 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 c c 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 ' 0.45 9/5/08 Packet Page 326 of 895 Meter 3 April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 7 0.00 0.05 6 II 0.10 5 0.15 4 0.20 c C9 3 = LL 3 0.25 0.30 2 0.35 1 0.40 0 0.45 4/1/08 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 4/26/08 5/1/08 5/6/08 Date/Time Packet Page 327 of 895 Meter 3 December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 7 0 0.05 6 0.1 5 0.15 G 4 0.2 c C9 c 0.25 3 0.3 2 14 0.35 1 0.4 0 0.45 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 12/16/06 12/21 /06 12/26/06 12/31 /06 1 /5/07 Date/Time Packet Page 328 of 895 7 N 2 1 0 ' 12/1 /07 12/6/07 Meter 3 December 2007 Flow and Rainfall 12/11 /07 12/16/07 12/21 /07 Date/Time 12/26/07 12/31 /07 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 c c 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 1 /5/08 Packet Page 329 of 895 Meter A August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 330 of 895 Meter A August 2008 Flow and Rainfall 2.5 1 16 1k, I 0 0.05 2 0.1 0.15 1.5 ' G 0.2 c 0 3 = 0.25 1 0.3 0.35 0.5 0.4 0 0.45 08/01 /08 08/06/08 08/11 /08 08/16/08 08/21 /08 08/26/08 08/31 /08 09/05/08 Date/Time Packet Page 331 of 895 Meter A April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 2.5 r 0 0.05 2 0.1 0.15 1.5 G 0.2 c 0 3 = 0.25 1 1 0.3 0.35 0.5 0.4 0 0.45 4/1/08 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 4/26/08 5/1/08 5/6/08 Date/Time Packet Page 332 of 895 Meter A December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 6 0 0.05 5 0.1 4 0.15 G 0.2 c C9 3 3 = 0.25 2 0.3 0.35 1 0.4 0 0.45 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 12/ 16/06 12/21 /06 12/26/06 12/31 /06 1 /5/07 Date/Time Packet Page 333 of 895 ri 2 1 0 ' 12/1 /07 12/6/07 Meter A December 2007 Flow and Rainfall 12/11 /07 12/16/07 12/21 /07 Time/Date 12/26/07 12/31 /07 W 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 c c 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 1 0.45 1 /5/08 Packet Page 334 of 895 Meter B August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 335 of 895 Meter B August 2008Flow and Rainfall 1 0 0.9 179 0.05 0.8 0.1 0.7 0.15 0.6 0 0.2 c 0 0.5 3 U- 0.25 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.35 0.2 0.1 0.4 0 0.45 8/1 /08 8/6/08 8/11 /08 8/16/08 8/21 /08 8/26/08 8/31 /08 9/5/08 Date/Time Packet Page 336 of 895 1 0.7 0.6 0 0.5 3 0 U- 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 4/1 /08 Meter B April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 4/26/08 5/1/08 Date/Time N 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 c 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 5/6/08 Packet Page 337 of 895 Meter B December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 2.5 0 0.05 2 0.1 0.15 1.5 G 0.2 c 0 3 = U- 0.25 1 0.3 0.35 0.5 0.4 0 0.45 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 12/16/06 12/21 /06 12/26/06 12/31 /06 1 /5/07 Date/Time Packet Page 338 of 895 G 0 3 0 U- 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 I 12/1 /07 12/6/07 12/11/07 Meter B December 2007 Flow and Rainfall 12/ 16/07 12/21 /07 Date/Time 12/26/07 12/31 /07 W 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 c c 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 1 0.45 1 /5/08 Packet Page 339 of 895 Meter C August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 340 of 895 Meter C August 2008 Flow and Rainfall 0.3 0 0.05 0.25 0.1 0.2 Ik 0.15 G 0.2 c 0 0.15 3 = U- 0.25 0.1 0.3 0.35 0.05 0.4 0 0.45 8/1 /08 8/6/08 8/11 /08 8/16/08 8/21 /08 8/26/08 8/31 /08 9/5/08 Date/Time Packet Page 341 of 895 Meter C April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 0.3 0 7t 0.05 0.25 11 � 0.1 0.2 0.15 0.2 v 0.15 3 � L—°° 0.25 0.1 0.3 0.35 0.05 0.4 0 0.45 4/1/08 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 4/26/08 5/1/08 5/6/08 Date/Time Packet Page 342 of 895 1.2 1 f: 0 0.6 3 0 U. 0.4 W! 0 '� 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 Meter C December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 12/16/06 12/21 /06 Date/Time 12/26/06 12/31 /06 lus - 0.05 - 0.1 - 0.15 0.2 c 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 1 /5/07 Packet Page 343 of 895 Meter C December 2007 Flow and Rainfall 1.2 1 0.8 0.4 0.2 12/6/07 12/11/07 12/16/07 12/21/07 Date/Time 12/26/07 12/31/07 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 = c 0.25 of°c 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 1/5/08 Packet Page 344 of 895 Meter D August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 345 of 895 Meter D August 2008 Flow and Rainfall 3.5 3 2.5 0 2 c� 3 0 LL 1.5 1 0.5 0 8/1 /08 8/6/08 8/11 /08 8/16/08 8/21 /08 8/26/08 8/31 /08 Date/Time Iff 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 c 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 9/5/08 Packet Page 346 of 895 Meter D April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 3.5 r 0 0.05 3 0.1 2.5 0.15 G 2 0.2 c 0 3 = 1.5 0.25 0.3 1 0.35 0.5 0.4 0 0.45 4/1/08 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 4/26/08 5/1/08 5/6/08 Date/Time Packet Page 347 of 895 Meter D December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 7.00 0.00 0.05 6.00 0.10 5.00 Ik 0.15 1 .. 4.00 G 0.20 c C9 3.00 0.25 0.30 2.00 0.35 1.00 0.40 0.00 0.45 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 12/16/06 12/21 /06 12/26/06 12/31 /06 Date/Time Packet Page 348 of 895 WIN 6.00 5.00 4.00 (7 3 0 3.00 r II hill] 0.00 12/1/07 Meter D December 2007 Flow and Rainfall 12/6/07 12/11/07 12/16/07 12/21/07 12/26/07 12/31/07 Date/Time 1 IN 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 cf0c 0.30 0.35 0.40 1 0.45 1/5/08 Packet Page 349 of 895 Meter E August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 350 of 895 Meter E August 2008 Flow and Rainfall 1.8 0.00 1.6 0.05 1.4 0.10 1.2 0.15 1 ; 0.20 c � • �I c II.. .. • i IL .,� I 0.6 ' 0.30 0.4 0.35 I I 0.2 • 0.40 0 0.45 8/1 /08 8/6/08 8/11 /08 8/16/08 8/21 /08 8/26/08 8/31 /08 9/5/08 Date/Time Packet Page 351 of 895 Meter E April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 1.8 0.00 1.6 0.05 1.4 0.10 1.2 0.15 1 * 0.20LL c K♦ '� Fv II • • I •i'I 0.8 ; ;� 'o� 0.25 s � 0.6 0.30 w. M 0.4 0.35 0.2 0.40 0 0.45 4/1/08 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 4/26/08 5/1/08 5/6/08 Date/Time Packet Page 352 of 895 Meter E December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 3 Im7[j 0.00 0.05 2.5 0.10 2 0.15 G 0.20 c 0 1.5 3 = LL 0.25 1 0.30 0.35 0.5 0.40 0 0.45 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 12/16/06 12/21 /06 12/26/06 12/31 /06 1 /5/07 Date/Time Packet Page 353 of 895 3 2.5 2 G 0 1.5 3 0 U- 1 0.5 Meter E December 2007 Flow and Rainfall TI 0 L 12/1 /07 12/6/07 12/11 /07 12/16/07 12/21 /07 12/26/07 12/31 /07 Date/Time WE 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 c c 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 ' 0.45 1 /5/08 Packet Page 354 of 895 Edmonds Meter August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 355 of 895 IIN 5.0 4.0 0 0 3.0 3 0 LL WIIN 1.0 0.0 L 7/30/08 Edmonds Meter August 2008 Flow and Rainfall 8/4/08 8/9/08 8/14/08 8/19/08 Date/Time 8/24/08 8/29/08 All$] 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 S c 0.25 Mi] 0.35 0.40 0.45 9/3/08 Packet Page 356 of 895 Edmonds Meter April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 6.0 + 0 77 f 0.05 5.0 0.1 4.0 0.15 G 0.2 c 0 3.0 3 = U- 0.25 2.0 0.3 0.35 1.0 0.4 0.0 0.45 4/1/08 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 4/26/08 5/1/08 5/6/08 Date/Time Packet Page 357 of 895 Edmonds Meter December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 16.0 0.00 14.0 0.05 0.10 12.0 0.15 10.0 0.20 c C9 8.0 3 = 0.25 6.0 0.30 4.0 0.35 2.0 0.40 0.0 0.45 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 12/16/06 12/21 /06 12/26/06 12/31 /06 1 /5/07 Date/Time Packet Page 358 of 895 Edmonds Meter December 2007 Flow and Rainfall 16.0 ■ 14.0 12.0 10.0 o i 8.0 s LL Z 6.0 i I 4.0 •� _ 2.0, s �•Z t 1 0.0 12/1 /07 12/6/07 12/11 /07 12/16/07 12/21 /07 Date/Time 12/26/07 12/31 /07 W1 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 ' 0.45 1 /5/08 Packet Page 359 of 895 MLT Meter August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 360 of 895 MLT Meter August 2008 Flow and Rainfall 8.0 0.00 + 7.0 0.05 0.10 6.0 0.15 5.0 0.20 c 0 4.0 3 = LL 0.25 3.0 0.30 2.0 0.35 1.0 0.40 0.0 0.45 8/1 /08 8/6/08 8/11 /08 8/16/08 8/21 /08 8/26/08 8/31 /08 Date/Time Packet Page 361 of 895 MLT Meter April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 8.0 r 0.00 7.0 0.05 0.10 6.0 0.15 5.0 0.20 c 0 4.0 3 = 0.25 3.0 0.30 2.0 0.35 1.0 0.40 0.0 0.45 4/1/2008 4/6/2008 4/11/2008 4/16/2008 4/21/2008 4/26/2008 5/1/2008 5/6/2008 Date/Time Packet Page 362 of 895 MLT Meter December 2006 Flow and Rainfall 12.0 0.00 0.05 10.0 0.10 8.0 0.15 0.20 c 0 6.0 3 = 0.25 4.0 0.30 0.35 2.0 0.40 0.0 0.45 12/1 /06 12/6/06 12/11 /06 12/16/06 12/21 /06 12/26/06 12/31 /06 1 /5/07 Date/Time Packet Page 363 of 895 MLT Meter December 2007 Flow and Rainfall 12.0 0.00 T77 0.05 10.0 0.10 8.0 Ik 0.15 0.20 0 c� 2 - 6.0 o I � U. 0.25 4.0 0.30 0.35 2.0 4 o1 0.40 0.0 0.45 12/1 /07 12/6/07 12/11 /07 12/ 16/07 12/21 /07 12/26/07 12/31 /07 1 /5/08 Date/Time Packet Page 364 of 895 Lift Station No. 1 August 2008 April 2008 December 2006 December 2007 Packet Page 365 of 895 2 rm 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 0 C7 1 3 0 U. 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 8/1/08 Pump # 1 Aueust 2008 Flow and Rainfall 8/6/08 8/11/08 8/16/08 8/21/08 Date/Time 8/26/08 8/31/08 W I$ 0.05 [11RiM 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 1 0.45 9/5/08 Packet Page 366 of 895 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 c c7 � 1 3 0 LL 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 4/1/08 Pump # 1 April 2008 Flow and Rainfall 4/6/08 4/11/08 4/16/08 4/21/08 4/26/08 5/1/08 Date/Time NUIXIT11 - 0.05 WI]WI1 - 0.15 0.20 2 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 1 0.45 5/6/08 c Packet Page 367 of 895 3.0 2.5 2.0 C 1.5 3 0 LL 1.0 0.5 0.0 1 11/29/06 Pump # 1 12/4/06 12/9/06 12/14/06 12/19/06 12/24/06 12/29/06 Date/Time M 0.05 MRs] 0.15 0.20 c c 0.25 w 111911] 0.35 0.40 ' 0.45 1/3/07 Packet Page 368 of 895 Appendix B Proposed Standards, Policies and Guidelines Standards a. S-1 Storm Drainage Connections to the Sanitary Sewer System b. S-2 Connections to Existing Sewer System C. S-3 Allowable Connections to Side Sewers d. S-4 Visual Inspection of Manholes for SSES Investigations e. S-5 CCTV Inspections of Sewers for SSES Investigations f. S-6 Smoke Testing for SSES Investigations g. S-7 Dye Testing for SSES Investigations h. S-8 Design Capacity for Pipeline Rehabilitation Projects i. S-9 Sewers on Steep Slopes j. S-10 Manhole Locations and Covers k. S-11 Manhole Size I. S-12 Sewer System Design m. S-13 Manhole Joints n. S-14 Side Sewer Connection Location and Taps o. S-15 Abandonment Requirements p. S-16 Pipe Materials q. S-17 Pipe Rehabilitation Methods r. S-18 Inspection Wyes/Cleanouts S. S-19 Inspection of Pipe Installation and Backfill t. S-20 Pipe Zone Bedding and Trench Backfill (Side Sewers) U. S-21 Manhole Leveling Rings V. S-22 Root Intrusion w. S-23 Root Intrusion (Side Sewers) X. S-24 Pipeline Leak Testing y. S-25 Sanitary Side Sewer Inspection Z. S-26 Side Sewer/Lateral Leak Testing aa. S-27 Manhole Leak Inspection bb. S-28 Product Specific Inspection cc. S-29 Product Specific Inspection (Side Sewer) dd. S-30 CCTV Inspection ee. S-31 CCTV Inspection (Side Sewers) ff. S-32 Certification, Warranty and Qualifications gg. S-33 Bonding and Warrant Inspection Policies a. P-1 Community Education and Involvement b. P-2 Responsibility for Community Education C. P-3 Public Funding d. P-4 Rates, Incentives and Surcharges e. P-5 Cost Sharing Packet Page 369 of 895 C;i d(WinPc a b c d e f. g P-6 Stormwater Drainage Ordinances P-7 On -site Storm Drainage Management P-8 Infeasible or Prohibitively Expensive Modifications P-9 Contractor Qualifications P-10 Required Permits P-11 Inspection and Testing P-12 Property Restoration P-13 Contractor Bonding, Licensing and Warranty P-14 Access to Private Property P-15 Limiting Liability P-16 Legislative Action Requirements P-17 Side Sewer Ownership and Responsibility G-1 Modeling and Engineering Analysis G-2 Lateral and Side Sewer Rehabilitation Methods G-3 Pipe Protection - Depth of Cover G-4 Manhole Rehabilitation G-5 Spot Repairs G-6 Spot Repairs (Side Sewers) G-7 Manhole Lids/Inserts Packet Page 370 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program I/I DISCHARGE SITE CONDITIONS TITLE: Storm Drainage Connections to the Sanitary Sewer System STANDARD NO. S-1 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Direct connection of storm water collection systems to the sanitary sewer system reduces the capacity of the sewer system and increases surcharging potential of the pipe, which can contribute to sewer deterioration and increase the potential for pipeline collapse. Some agencies allow surface water runoff collected from areas subject to high pollutant loading to discharge to the sanitary sewer. Numerous connections of this type can overload the Edmonds sanitary sewer collections stem. STANDARD + No storm drainage connections shall be made to the sanitary sewer system unless approved by the City of Edmonds, and only under special circumstances. The discharges shall be defined by discharge permit, contract or other such document. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 41 Provisions will need to be addressed for water quality treatment from surface water collection areas subject to high pollutant loading that the City may have previously connected to the sanitary sewer system. Requests to connect storm water collection areas to the sanitary sewer system will have to be reviewed for conformance with the special circumstances developed by the City. 10 Special fee structures may be adopted for connection of storm drainage sources to the sanitary sewer system. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + No impact. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 371 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Connections to Existing Sewer System STANDARD NO. S-2 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: When new connections are made to the existing sewer system, I/I potential exists from three general locations: 1) the connection itself leaks, 2) the system being added has leaks, and/or 3) the system being added has illegal connections that are inflow sources. STANDARD Connections to the existing sewer system will only be allowed at manholes, to a main via an existing tee or a tap, or to the end of an existing pipe that meets all applicable I/I Standards. Where a new manhole is being installed in an existing system, the I/I Standards for new manholes shall apply. Testing and inspection: • The new conveyance system to be connected shall be inspected to confirm that no illicit connections contributing inflow have been added. • At manhole locations, the connection at the existing manhole shall be visually inspected for water tightness after the pipe has been completely backfilled and groundwater has returned to its natural elevation. The new line shall not be put into service until the connection has been inspected and POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Inspection requirements to confirm work performed correctly. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY I RATEPAYER IMPACTS + No impact. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 372 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Allowable Connections to Side Sewers STANDARD NO. S-3 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: A description is given of allowable and disallowable connections to side sewers for the purpose of eliminating clean surface and subsurface drainage flow to the City of Edmonds sewer system. STANDARD + Side sewers discharging to the sewer system shall convey sanitary sewage only. Sanitary sewage sources are limited to: • Building plumbing outlets. • Sump Pumps conveying sanitary sewage. + Sources of clean water flow shall not be conveyed by side sewers discharging to the sewer system, including: • Downspouts. • Foundation drains. • Catch basins. • Storm water inlets and trench drains. • Structure or landscaping under -drain systems. • Sump pumps discharging surface runoff or subsurface drainage flow. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS • Allowable connections to side sewers shall be in conformance with applicable plumbing codes. • Newly developing building sites will be required to establish separate surface and sub surface drainage systems compatible with the developed site grading, soil conditions, groundwater table, and adjacent environmentally sensitive areas. Comprehensive monitoring for disallowable side sewer connections will be required, particularly where alternate disposal requirements for drainage are onerous to the property owner. • It is expected that some existing building sites will be found to be discharging clean water to the side sewer, either as a result of partial failure of side sewers, or as a result of illicit connections. When implementing corrective measures for these sites, consideration must be given to disposition of the resulting displaced flows. New site drainage systems implemented for this purpose must be compatible with the developed site grading, soil conditions, groundwater table, and adjacent environmentally sensitive areas. Requirements for newly developing sites are consistent with most current development regulations and should not result in development costs above and beyond current requirements. 4 Repair of failed side sewers will result in varying levels of cost on a per site basis. Incremental cost impacts will be associated with the following factors: • Side sewer length. • Site development features (i.e. structures, landscaping, pavement, etc.). • Site accessibility (i.e. slope, overgrowth, sensitive areas, etc.). $ Disconnection of clean water sources from side sewers on developed sites will result in varying levels of cost on a per site basis. Incremental cost impacts will be associated with the following factors: • Distance to alternative discharge point for clean water flows. • Presence of environmentally sensitive areas. • Relative elevation of property to alternative discharge point. • Ground water elevation. • Site elevation relative to surrounding areas. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 373 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program • Proportion of impermeable area on the site. Testing to determine the presence of failed side sewer conditions that might allow clean water to enter the system cannot be comprehensively achieved except during wet weather conditions that result in saturated ground conditions. Testing for this purpose is best achieved on a basin wide basis through flow monitoring and analysis, or potentially through television inspection. Testing for illicit downspout connections and certain area drain connections can be achieved, under favorable conditions, through smoke testing. Some illicit connections of surface or subsurface drainage will not be detected through smoke testing, but might be detectable using dye testing. Generally, basin wide testing for illicit connections is implemented prior to the implementation phase to determine where remedial actions may be required. Site specific testing during implementation of the remedial work may be helpful in determining the effectiveness and completeness of the work being undertaken. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 0 Dependent on implementation of City -funded activities. See Policy 3. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 374 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING TITLE: Visual Inspection of Manholes for SSES Investigations STANDARD NO. S-4 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Manhole inspections are one of the most important efforts of a sewer system evaluation survey (SSES) investigation because manholes can account for a significant amount of the I/I entering a sanitary sewer system. The inspection provides a means for viewing the manhole internally to assist in: • Determining whether the cover is subject to ponding or surface water runoff. • Inspecting for internal leaks. • Analyzing structural deficiencies in the manhole structure. • Estimating 1/1 quantities in the manhole. Investigation of the internal condition of a manhole should be conducted from the inside of the manhole. Performing the investigation only from the surface and failing to thoroughly check the manhole interior commonly results in an inadequate inspection. Leaks around taps in the manhole are often confused with flow from the tap itself. If not closely inspected, leaks on the floor, in the channel, and around the pipe seals are often misidentified as eddies in the normal pipe flow. STANDARD Visual inspection of manholes shall be performed by experienced personnel trained in the proper safety measures for performing the inspection including, but not limited to, confined space entry and traffic control measures. It is recommended that the visual internal inspection be performed during the wet season when surrounding soils are fully saturated. Results of the manhole inspections shall be documented on a standard form which contains the following information: o Manhole identification or reference number and street location. o The date of the inspection. o Name of the inspector. o Pavement surface type and condition. o Whether the manhole cover is depressed below the adjacent surface grade and whether its location makes it subject to surface water flows or ponding. o Significant site features that may affect rehabilitation access or methods, including whether the manhole is located on private property or is located near sensitive habitat. o Cover information including size, number of pick holes, gasket condition, if present, and whether the cover is locking or not. o Frame information including size, grade, condition and presence and condition of an internal boot. o Chimney information including material and condition, diameter, height, seal condition at cone or top slab, presence and location of manhole steps, and evidence of infiltration. o Cone information including type and condition, seal at barrel and evidence of infiltration. o Barrel information including type, lateral locations, diameter and condition, seal at bench and bottom slab, and evidence of infiltration. Location and size of cracks and leak locations shall be documented. o Condition of channel and bench concrete and location of infiltration at the flow line and bench. o Presence, location and condition of drop connections. Manhole inspection results shall be archived by the City of Edmonds. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 375 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS * Training and upgrading of staffing skills to perform the manhole inspections and interpret results, if not contracted with outside vendors. * Additional staff resources (FTEs) may be required. * Additional staff time for conducting inspections, interpreting results, reporting and archiving of data. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 4 No impacts. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 376 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Inspection of Sewers for SSES Investigations uM STANDARD NO. S-5 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: CCTV inspection during a sewer system evaluation survey (SSES) provides a safe, low-cost and rapid means for viewing the sewer line internally to assist in: • Determining the physical condition of pipe joints. • Analyzing structural deficiencies and corrosion in pipelines. • Identifying sources of I/I. • Estimating quantity of infiltration. • Identifying changes in the sewer from the last CCTV inspection. STANDARD + CCTV inspection of sewers for an SSES investigation shall include a complete television inspection of the sewer main and may include laterals and side sewers that connect to the main. It is recommended that the CCTV inspection be performed during the wet season when surrounding soils are fully saturated. The decision to CCTV inspect laterals and side sewers shall be based on evidence that a significant source of the I/I originates from the laterals or side sewers. The factors that shall be considered include: • Flow monitoring data that suggests rapid infiltration. • Lack of I/I sources identified from CCTV inspection of the sewer main or smoke testing. Sewer cleaning shall be performed before beginning television inspection of sewer mains, laterals and side sewers. Television inspection shall be accomplished using a closed-circuit system specifically designed for sewer inspections. For each pipeline inspected, records shall be collected both digitally and on a field form. The digital record shall include the date of the inspection and a brief narrative description of the pipeline being inspected (manhole to manhole run, or service address) and discuss each defect that is observed. Field forms for sewer main inspections shall contain the following information: • The date of the inspection. • Name of CCTV crew members and their company or agency. • The reason for the inspection. • The location of the pipeline and the upstream and downstream manhole numbers. • The direction of the camera's travel. • The pipe size, type, pipe joint length, and overall footage of the inspected sewer. • The location and a description of each service connection. • A description of each defect observed and its distance from the point at which the viewing began. • Severity of I/I at each defect location. Field forms for lateral and side sewer inspections shall contain the following information: • The date of the inspection. • Name of CCTV crew members and their company or agency. • The reason for the inspection. • The service address. • The pipe size, type, pipe joint length, and overall footage of the inspected lateral/side sewer. • A description of each defect observed and its distance from the point at which the viewing 5/12/2010 Packet Page 377 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program • Severity of 1/1 at each defect location. • The location and a description of any observed connections to the lateral/side sewer. Field forms and digital record of inspections shall be archived by the City of Edmonds so that they may be compared to subsequent CCTV inspections that are performed on the same portions of the line. Videotaped footage of the CCTV inspection is an acceptable alternative to digital footage. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 0 Training and upgrading of staffing skills to perform the CCTV inspections and interpret results, if not contracted with outside vendors. 4 Additional staff resources (FTEs) may be required. $ Acquisition of CCTV inspection equipment and vehicles, or contracting with outside vendors. $ Additional staff time for conducting inspections, interpreting results, reporting and archiving of data. $ Additional cost for CCTV of laterals/side sewers. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ No impact. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 378 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Smoke Testing for SSES Investigations STANDARD NO. S-6 � 1 ., ... ... y..., � I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Smoke testing is the process of blowing a nontoxic smoke made from mineral oil at low pressure into the sewer system. Smoke testing provides a low-cost and rapid means for determining direct connections of inflow and rainfall -induced infiltration sources, such as: • Roof drains • Foundation drains • Catch basins • Area drains • Abandoned building sewers • Uncapped cleanouts • Illegal connections • Storm sewer cross connections STANDARD + Smoke testing for sewer system evaluation survey (SSES) investigations shall be performed by experienced personnel who know the effects of groundwater table, frozen ground, wind, rain, trapped service connections and snow cover on the test findings. Smoke used for the testing shall be non -toxic, odorless and non -staining. Blower capacity shall be determined based on the size of area to be tested, but in no case shall it be less than 1,750 cfm. The vacuum effect of flowing water drawing smoke downstream shall be taken into account. Police and fire departments shall be notified daily of test locations, and residents shall be notified in advance of the testing by a written testing notice. Residents shall also be informed individually on the day of testing by personnel having proper identification. The following chronological steps shall be used for smoke testing: • Isolate the sewer main line to be tested with plugging up to 400 feet at a time noting any surcharged line sections. Smoke will not pass through a flooded section. • Prepare a basic smoke sketch of the area being tested including location, date and the name of the company or agency and personnel performing the test. • Commence smoke testing using one blower at each manhole and enough smoke bombs to ensure smoke travels throughout the entire test section. Smoke shall be continuously generated while visual inspection and photography are in progress. • Visually inspect the entire area by walking around front and back yards and around buildings. Watch for smoke leaks; typical sources are roof leaders, area drains, foundation drains, house foundations, holes in the ground over the sewer or services, areas around manholes, and catch basins. Roof vents are not to be considered as smoke leaks. • Document whether or not smoke is observed to be discharging through the roof vents for each house and building included in the test area. • Photograph all smoke leaks. • Show the location of each leak on a sketch. Include the photograph number and compass directions taken, and a description of the leak including address. Provide dimensions to the leak from at least two easily identified site features and the estimated area (square footage) and surface type (i.e., grass, pavement, etc.) drained by the leak. • Photographs shall show the maximum amount of smoke emitted from the leak and the exact source of the leak. Photographs shall be taken from far enough back to provide a physical reference to the location of the smoke. They shall be numbered consecutively to ensure leaks can be identified at a later date. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 379 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 0 Time and resources to conduct smoke testing, if not already part of City procedures. + Acquisition of smoke testing equipment, if not already owned. $ Cost for additional staff workload, or contract with outside vendor. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS Identified defects and illicit connections on private property may need to be corrected by the property owner. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 380 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Dye Testing for SSES Investigations STANDARD NO. S-7 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Dye testing is a rainfall simulation technique used to identify specific defects that can contribute I/I during rainfall or snowmelt. Dye testing can also be effective in quantifying the amount of I/I that can enter a section of sewer or specific defect under a controlled runoff situation. Depending on the sources of I/I to be identified and the configuration of the runoff situation being simulated, the procedures for dye testing differ. Five examples of dye testing situations are as follows: • Determining Conditions Caused by Storm Drains —Storm drains that parallel or cross sanitary sewer pipes and have an invert elevation higher than the crown elevation of the sanitary sewer can be a source of rainfall -induced infiltration or inflow. They are inflow sources if there are cross connections between the storm drain and the sanitary sewer; they are infiltration sources if stormwater can exflltrate from them, percolate through soil, and enter the sanitary sewer through pipe or joint defects. • Determining Conditions Caused by Stream or Ditch Sections —Streams and stormwater ditches are inflow sources if there are cross connections between them and the sanitary sewer; they are infiltration sources if the surface water can percolate through soil and enter the sanitary sewer through pipe or joint defects. • Identifying I/I Sources from Private Property —Roof leaders; basement, yard and area drains; foundation drains; abandoned building sewers; and faulty connections are sources of private property defects that can be identified by dye testing. • Identifying Structurally Damaged Manholes —Dye testing can be used to verify structurally damaged manholes that leak when subjected to flooding or when groundwater elevations are high. • Verifying Sources Found by Other Testing Means —Dye testing can verify suspected sources of 1/1 identified in a visual survey or smoke testing study. Examples include manholes affected by surface water runoff, holes in the ground smoking over services or sewer mains, and cracks in the street pavement that are smoking. STANDARD + Dye testing for sewer system evaluation survey (SSES) investigations shall be performed by experienced personnel trained in the proper safety measures for performing the testing including, but not limited to, confined space entry into storm drain and sanitary sewer manholes, measures for controlling water head buildup behind plugs, and traffic control measures. A fluorescent dye having a distinct color readily detectible by eye shall be used for dye testing. The dye shall be safe to handle, visible in low concentrations, miscible in water, biodegradable and inert to solids and debris in the sewer. Procedures for dye testing shall be as follows: Determining Conditions Caused by Storm Drain 1. Plug both ends of the storm drain section to be tested with sand bags or sewer plugs and block all overflow and bypass points in the storm drain section. Bypass flow around the section under test if necessary. 2. Fill the storm drain section and stormwater inlets or catch basins to just below the grate with water. Add dye to the water. 3. Monitor the next downstream manhole in the sanitary sewer system for evidence of dyed water. 4. Measure the flow in the sanitary sewer manhole before and during dye testing. As an alternative, measure flow simultaneously at both the upstream and downstream sanit, 5/12/2010 Packet Page 381 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program manholes during the test. 5. Record the location of storm drain and sanitary sewer lines being tested; the time and duration of the tests; the manholes where the flows are monitored; the observed presence, concentration and travel time of the dyed water to the flow monitoring manholes; and the soil characteristics. Determining Conditions Caused by Streams or Ditch Sections 1. Plug or dam stream sections, ditch sections or ponded areas to be tested and fill to desired level with dyed water. Bypass flow around the section under test if necessary. 2. Follow steps 3 through 5 above. Identifying Sources on Private Property 1. Notify property owners and receive permission for testing in advance of testing. 2. Insert dyed water into suspected inflow source and monitor closest downstream sanitary sewer manhole for evidence of dyed water. 3. Record the date of the test; address and type of the inflow source; duration of the test; the manholes where the flows are monitored; and the observed presence, concentration and travel time of the dyed water to the flow monitoring manholes. Identifying Structurally Damaged Manholes 1. Flood the area around suspected manholes with dyed water. 2. Monitor manhole frame, chimney, cone and manhole walls for entry of dyed water. 3. Record the date of the test; manhole number; duration of the test; and the observed presence, concentration and travel time of the dyed water into the manhole. Verifying Sources Found by Other Testing Means 1. Notify property owners and receive permission for testing in advance of testing if performed on private property. 2. Flood the area where visual survey or smoke testing study revealed potential I/I source. It may be necessary to restrict runoff from the area with sand bags to allow the area to become saturated. 3. Monitor the next downstream manhole in the sanitary sewer system for evidence of dyed water. 4. Measure the flow in the sanitary sewer manhole before and during dye testing. As an alternative, measure flow simultaneously at both the upstream and downstream sanitary manholes during the test. 5. Record the location of sources being tested, including address if on private property; the time and duration of the tests; the manholes where the flows are monitored; the observed presence, concentration and travel time of the dyed water to the flow monitoring manholes; and the soil characteristics. A field log shall be filled out for all dye tests that are performed, regardless of whether a positive transference to the sanitary sewer is observed. A sketch of each testing setup shall be prepared showing testing location, manholes checked, dye transference information, and flooding time. The sketch shall also include the date and time of the test and the names of personnel. A photograph of each testing setup shall be taken and numbered. Photographs of the testing setup shall be referenced on the setup sketch. The appropriate agencies shall be notified of impending dye testing prior to test commencement. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Obtaining required permits for handling and disposal of test water volumes. $ Obtaining and appropriately disposing of test water volumes. $ Cost for additional staff workload, or contract with outside vendor. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 4 Property owners need to provide permission to perform testing on private property. $ Some disturbance to yards/landscaping could occur during testing. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 382 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program DESIGN TITLE: Design Capacity for Pipeline Rehabilitation Projects STANDARD NO. S-8 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Many pipeline rehabilitation techniques for I/1 control involve some loss in the hydraulic capacity of the system because the technique reduces the effective internal diameter of the pipe. Hydraulic capacity loss can range from moderate for techniques such as CIPP to high for techniques such as sliplining. Surcharging and sanitary sewer overflows can result if the hydraulic capacity is reduced below the required service capacity of the line. STANDARD + The design of pipeline rehabilitation projects for I/I control shall consider any loss in the hydraulic capacity of the system resulting from a decrease in the effective internal diameter of a pipeline. A Professional Civil Engineer shall verify that the rehabilitated pipe maintains the required hydraulic capacity to service peak demand flow projections for the area tributary to the pipeline. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ The City will need to verify that the project designer has addressed the hydraulic capacity of the pipeline. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + No impact. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 383 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Sewers on Steep Slopes STANDARD NO. S-9 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Pipe that is installed on steep slopes is more susceptible to movement, breakage, and slipped joints, which may allow I/I into the system. Special measures to anchor pipes installed on steep slopes may be required depending on the stability of the existing soils, local groundwater conditions, and the quality of the bedding and backfill construction during pipe installation. STANDARD Sewer mains on steep slopes shall be designed by a Professional Engineer to ensure the integrity of the system to prevent leakage and minimize I/I. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Verify that a Professional Engineer has addressed pipe anchoring requirements on steep slopes. 0 Additional cost for pipe anchors that are typically a requirement on steep slope pipeline installations. 0 Inspectors will need to verify that anchors are installed as designed. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 0 No impact. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 384 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Manhole Location and Covers STANDARD NO. S-10 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Placement of manholes is important for two reasons: • the potential for I/I will decrease by not placing it in a location subject to surface water flows or ponding • proper location can improve the City's ability to inspect and maintain the system, thus reducing I/I. When manholes must be placed in areas subject to surface water flows, inflow can be prevented by providing a watertight frame and covers stem. STANDARD + Manholes shall not be installed in areas subject to surface inundation such as pavement depressions and gutters. If this cannot be avoided, then the entire manhole, including cover, shall be designed as a watertight system. Buoyancy of the watertight manhole shall be accounted for in the design. For manholes placed in lakes or ponds a special watertight manhole, including access system, shall be designed to prevent leakage and to insure maintainability. + For manholes located in paved roadways, parking lots, or other areas that become subject to channelized stormwater flow due to re -grading, the manhole shall be retrofit with a watertight frame and cover system to prevent inflow. + Watertight frame and covers shall consist of a solid, gasketed cover or an approved manhole cover insert that stops the inflow of surface water into the manhole. Manhole cover inserts may be installed beneath a standard cover. Manhole cover inserts shall be in conformance with Standard Detail MH-3. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS + Added cost for watertight design in areas that may not now be required to be watertight. $ Sewer system plan review would need to include an assessment of locations where manhole cover inserts are required. $ Field inspection to ensure watertight manhole covers are installed where specified would be required. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTYIRATEPAYER IMPACTS 0 Potentially higher ratepayer cost for watertight design. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 385 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Manhole Size STANDARD NO. S-11 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Providing a watertight seal at pipe penetrations is difficult when new or existing manholes are too small to accommodate all penetrations for incoming and outgoing pipes. Provisions to provide a minimum distance between manhole knockouts and minimum manhole sizes based on pipe size ensure a watertight pipe connection can be made and help prevent structural failure of the manhole. STANDARD + New manholes shall be sized so that the minimum distance between knockouts is in accordance with the requirements of the WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications and the manhole manufacturers' standards. A connection detail stamped and signed by a Professional Civil Engineer and approved by the manhole manufacturer shall be provided where the minimum distance between onenines cannot be maintained. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 4 Review of manhole shop drawings is required to ensure that the minimum sizing and spacing requirements are being met, or that a connection detail prepared by a Professional Engineer is being provided. $ Manhole construction costs may increase moderately if the City has previously allowed contractors to make connections to existing manholes or size new manholes without requiring the specified minimum sizes or distance between knockouts and adjacent pipe connections. $ Inspection of manhole construction is required to insure that the pipe locations and connections are as detailed and not field modified. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS Potentially higher ratepayer costs if the City has not previously required minimum distances between knockouts. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 386 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Sewer System Design STANDARD NO. S-12 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Structural failure of pipe and manholes can lead to infiltration of groundwater. The following key factors contribute to the impairment of a sewer system's structural abilities, resulting in I/I: • Sewer mains, manholes, laterals and side sewers that are not properly supported are subject to vertical displacements over time, causing joints to open and pipeline trenches to settle, producing cracks or breaks in sections of the pipe. • Materials must be appropriate for design conditions and the ground conditions present. Pipeline failures often occur due to the misuse of materials. • Deep cuts and poor ground conditions often result in a larger than necessary excavation, leading to unequal settlement if uniform support is not provided for the pipe and manhole. Inadequate support often causes failure of the pipe in shear at the manhole and provides a point of entry for groundwater. Recognizing past situations that have allowed extraneous flows to enter the system and requiring sound and appropriate design measures to prevent these deficiencies on future projects can greatly reduce future 1/I. STANDARD Sewer system design shall be performed by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the State of Washington. The designer shall verify that sound and appropriate standards and measures have been employed in the design of new sewer systems. This shall include the choice of sewer materials for the design conditions, pipe bedding and backfill requirements, and the evaluation for pipe casing requirements. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ The City will need to verify that the designer has adequately addressed elements of the sewer design that relate to the structural integrity of the system. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + No impacts. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 387 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program CONSTRUCTION & INSPECTION TITLE: Manhole Joints STANDARD NO. S-13 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Joints in manholes present potential sources of I/I from the precast concrete manhole segments, adjustments rings and pipe penetrations. STANDARD + All manholes shall be completely watertight from the top of the casting down. + Manholes materials and construction shall be in accordance with WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications except as modified by this standard and Standard Details MH-1 and MH-2. + Precast concrete manhole sections shall be joined with either rubber or flexible plastic gaskets. + All lifting holes shall be completely filled with non -shrink grout. + Typical pipe penetrations through precast concrete sections shall be either factory knockouts or core drilled (not line drilled or rough broken) cutouts. Pipe shall enter the manhole through a rubber gasketed entry coupling specifically design for a flexible, watertight connection either cast into the manhole section or grouted in place with non -shrink grout. Where a new manhole is being constructed as a "saddle manhole", which is built around an existing sewer main, the manhole shall be designed by a Professional Civil Engineer. The saddle manhole shall be of sufficient diameter to provide a watertight connection between the manhole and the wall of the existing pipe. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS + No major impact because the City currently meets this standard. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ No impacts. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 388 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Side Sewer Connection Location and Taps STANDARD NO. S-14 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: The location of a side sewer connection to a mainline in an area with difficult access or in such a manner as to induce unnecessary stress on the system can make it more prone to damage and less apt to be maintained, thus resulting in I/I. Good construction techniques and proper selection of materials for side sewer taps can reduce I/I by protecting the mainline from damage by providing a watertight seal. STANDARD + No side sewers shall be connected to a main located in a lake or similar body of water except under special circumstances. + If a side sewer must be connected at a manhole, then it shall penetrate the manhole wall through a watertight rubber gasketed factory manhole adapter specially designed for the side sewer material type. A mortared connection at a manhole will not be permitted unless the structure is constructed as a saddle manhole. + All connections to existing mains shall be made at an existing tee fitting or by core drilling a hole in the existing sewer main and installing an approved gasketed factory sewer saddle or cutting in a gasketed factory tee. The City of Edmonds may consider other connection alternatives if the method can be demonstrated to provide a watertight connection. Line drilling or rough breakouts shall not be used. + For a tapped connection to the mainline, the hole shall be as small as possible to accommodate the outside diameter of the side sewer pipe with adequate space for minor angle alignment adjustments of the side sewer. The connection shall be made with a factory saddle specifically designed for side sewer connections and fabricated of corrosion resistant materials and mechanically attached to the pipe to withstand the anticipated loads. The saddle shall provide a rubber gasketed joint between the sewer main and the saddle. + Factory tees shall be appropriate for the soil conditions encountered in the connection location and shall have rubber gasketed joints. Material selection shall take into account the soil corrosistivity, compatibility of materials with the existing pipe, strength requirements, and bedding/backfill conditions. The tee shall be connected to the existing sewer main pipe by short sections of plain end pipe and an approved stainless steel repair clamp. The short sections of pipe shall match the sewer main pipe material and shall meet or exceed the strength of the existing system. Stainless steel repair clamps shall be gasketed, with a minimum length of two pipe diameters, and assembled with all stainless steel bolts and nuts. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Inspection requirements to confirm compliance with standards or do tap itself. 4� Moderate cost of using saddles. $ High cost of using cut in tees and dealing with active sewer line. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Higher ratepayer costs for using tees. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 389 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Abandonment Requirements STANDARD NO. S-15 UI CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Abandoned sewer pipes and manholes that are not completely isolated from the remaining system pose potential sources for I/I. Abandoned sewer mains are defined as any section of pipe extended beyond a manhole with no services attached and no plan for future extension or service connection(s). Abandoned side sewers fall into two categories. If no fixture connection is anticipated, then the entire side sewer from the main is considered abandoned. If a fixture connection is anticipated, then the side sewer shall be considered abandoned at the property line. STANDARD + Manholes: Manholes shall not be abandoned if they are on the end of an active sewer main. If the manhole is part of an abandoned pipe system, then it shall be completely filled and all pipes physically connected to the manhole shall be plugged. Sewer Main Pipe: Abandoned sewer main pipes shall be plugged with a minimum of length of 3 pipe diameters with a non -shrink grout or other impermeable material at the manhole. The pipe shall be prepared to provide a watertight bond between the plug material and existing pipe. 4, Sewer Main Abandonment Inspection: The plug shall be visually inspected for any leaks during the wet season while under warranty. * Side Sewers: Abandoned side sewer pipe shall be capped with a watertight plug for future use or plugged with a minimum of length of 3 pipe diameters with a non -shrink grout or other impermeable material. The pipe shall be prepared to provide a watertight bond between the plug material and existing pipe. * Side Sewer Abandonment Inspection: Plugged side sewers shall be CCTV inspected for leakage at the sewer main connection during the wet season while under warranty. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Inspection requirements to confirm that the work was done correctly. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Potentially higher ratepayer costs for increased inspection costs. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 390 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Pipe Materials STANDARD NO. S-16 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Pipe breakage and joint failures may occur because of improperly selected side sewer/lateral pipe materials and/or installation procedures, resulting in infiltration. Proper selection of pipe materials and joint systems is an important component of side sewer design and construction that will result in reduced immediate and future infiltration. STANDARD + Side sewer/lateral pipe materials shall be selected based on external loading and soil corrosion potential. Pipe materials used shall have strength characteristics consistent with the earth load and surcharge conditions anticipated. Vehicle live loads, overburden, soil characteristics, and slope conditions shall be considered. Side sewers shall be installed below the frost line and at a depth consistent with the published load bearing capacity of the pipe material used. Pipe materials used shall have corrosion resistant characteristics consistent with the corrosivity of the environment in which they are to be installed. + Side sewer/lateral pipe materials shall employ gasketed joints and standard manufactured fittings designed for use with the pipe material installed. Deflection of joints shall be limited to 80% of the published maximum deflection for the gasketed joint. Flexible pipe materials used shall be properly bedded and backfilled to ensure that deflection of the pipe beyond its structural capacity will not occur and that deflection "out of round" beyond the capability of the pipe joints to remain sealed does not occur. + Connection between the side sewer/lateral and dissimilar building plumbing piping shall be accomplished using approved flexible water tight couplings specifically designed for the pipe materials joined. Butt joints wrapped and/or encased in concrete or mortar joint will not be allowed. Connection of pressure discharges from building plumbing to gravity side sewers/laterals shall be accomplished using standard pressure fittings and shall be anchored to ensure against movement during pressurization cycles. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 0 Site inspection of side sewer/lateral material and joint installation insuring requirements are met. $ Additional inspection and review time would be required if the City is not currently inspecting side sewer installations and reviewing material submittals. + Integrity of the installed pipe material and joints must be determined through water, air, or vacuum testing (see testing standards). Testing to confirm integrity of side sewers/laterals should be required prior to acceptance of the installation following construction and following a one-year POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS May be added costs to property owner/developers if their practices change due to standards for pipe material and joint systems being more strictly enforced. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 391 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Pipe Rehabilitation Methods STANDARD NO. S-17 ---Z� UI CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Once the decision has been made to rehabilitate a sewer to control I/I, several alternatives may be used to replace the existing sewer. These include trenchless rehabilitation techniques such as cure -in -place lining or pipe bursting, as well as conventional dig and replace. An evaluation should be made to determine suitability (technical and cost-effectiveness) of trenchless methods versus conventional dig and replacement of the sewer. The technical evaluation should assess specific issues such as the sewer location, alignment, condition of the pipe being replaced, and future service requirements for the sewer. If the rehabilitation technique will reduce the cross sectional flow area of the pipe the technical evaluation should consider loss in hydraulic capacity of the line in accordance with the I/I Capacity for Pipeline Standard S-4. The alternative pipe rehabilitation methods that should be considered include: Pipe bursting is a trenchless pipeline rehabilitation method that can be used to replace sewer pipes. It is possible to increase the size of the pipe; however, site specific constraints may limit the ability to increase the size. Using pipe bursting to replace a pipe may be restricted depending upon adjacent utilities, proximity to a road surface, the type of existing pipe being replaced, and soil conditions. There are a number of variations on pipe bursting such as pneumatic, hydraulic expansion, and static pull systems. All of these displace the old pipe into the adjacent ground and pull a new pipe in to replace the old pipe. There are also related processes such as pipe reaming, which is a variation of horizontal directional drilling, where pieces of the old pipe are removed rather than pushing them into the adjacent soil. Pipe bursting may be used for mainline, lateral, and side sewer repair. The most common pipe material used is HDPE but other types of pipe material such as cast iron, MDPE, and ABS can be used for the replacement pipe. Cure -in -place pipe (CIPP,) liner is a trenchless pipeline rehabilitation method that can be used to repair existing sewer pipes. CIPP liner involves inverting an epoxy -resin -impregnated flexible tube into an existing line using hydrostatic head. The resin is then cured using heat to produce a pipe inside the existing pipe. The outside diameter of the replacement pipe is smaller than the existing pipe to allow the system to be installed. Capacity in the pipeline will be reduced because of the reduction in pipe size. Slip lining is a trenchless pipeline rehabilitation method that can be used to replace sewer pipes. Slip lining involves pushing or pulling a replacement pipe into an existing pipe. The outside diameter of the replacement pipe is smaller than the inside diameter of the existing pipe to allow the replacement pipe to be installed. Capacity in the pipeline will be reduced because of the reduction in pipe size. A variety of pipe materials may be used for slip lining including HDPE, ductile iron, PVC, concrete and fiberglass. The annular space should be grouted unless there are project specific reasons to do otherwise. Fold and form lining is a trenchless pipeline rehabilitation method that can be used to repair existing sewer pipes. The fold -and -form process involves inserting a heated PVC or HDPE thermoplastic liner, folded or deformed into a U-shape, into an existing sewer and re -rounding the liner using heat and pressure to produce a pipe inside the existing pipe. The outside diameter of the replacement pipe is smaller than the existing pipe to allow the system to be installed. Capacity in the pipeline will be reduced because of the reduction in pipe size. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 392 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program STANDARD + Construction standards for pipe bursting, cure -in -place lining, slip -lining and folded and formed liners shall be as follows: + Pipe Bursting: • Pipe bursting shall meet the requirements of the City's Inflow and Infiltration Control Program Guide Specifications. + Cure -in -Place Lining: • Cure -in -place -lining shall meet the requirements of the City's Inflow and Infiltration Control Program Guide Specifications. • Service connections to the new lined pipe shall be made water tight by grouting the area where the service connection enters the lined pipe or by installing a service connection rehabilitation liner in conformance with the City's Inflow and Infiltration Control Program Guide Specifications. + Slip Lining: • Slip lining shall conform to ASTM F585-94 — "Standard Practice for Insertion of Flexible Polyethylene Pipe Into Existing Sewers". • The type of replacement pipe used shall meet or exceed the requirements for sewer pipe materials in I/I Pipe Materials Guideline G-6Standard and shall be suitable for the slip lining process being used. • New pipe connections to manholes shall provide a water tight connection suitable for the type of replacement pipe being used and in accordance with the I/I Connections to Existing System Standard S-2. Acceptable manhole connections may include commercially available manhole connection boots or the pipe grouted into the manhole pipe penetration with a seep ring on the pipe. • Lateral connections to the new pipe shall also be made using commercially available fittings suitable for the type of replacement pipe. For HDPE pipe, lateral wyes or tees shall be made using manufacturer provided fusion welded fittings or other City -approved fittings specifically manufactured for HDPE pipe. • The annular space shall be grouted unless there are project specific reasons to do otherwise. Issues to be considered relative to the annular space grouting include grouting pressures and pipe restraint to prevent floatation. + Fold and Form: • Fold and form -lining shall meet the requirements of the City's I/I Control Program Guide Specifications. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 0 Inspection requirements to confirm that the trenchless rehabilitation is done correctly. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ No impact. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 393 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Inspection Wyes/Cleanouts STANDARD NO. S-18 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Pipe breakage and joint failures may occur during the service life of a side sewer pipe, resulting in infiltration. Installation of inspection wyes/cleanouts at the upstream end of the side sewer allows for the future preparation and inspection to identify infiltration problems and their specific sources. STANDARD + An inspection wye/cleanout shall be installed in each new and rehabilitated side sewer immediately down stream of the connection between the building plumbing outlet and the side sewer per Standard Detail SS-1. The inspection wye/cleanout shall meet the requirements of Standard Detail SS-4. Inspection wyes/cleanouts shall be installed no less than 2 feet and no more than 5 feet beyond the face of the building for new side sewer installations. For rehabilitation projects, the inspection wye/cleanout shall be located within 2 feet of the termination of the rehabilitation. Inspection wyes/cleanouts shall be located, to the greatest extent possible, to ensure CCTV accessibility in the future throughout the entire side sewer. + When any work is done to rehabilitate a side sewer that involves excavating to expose and gain entry to the pipe outside of an existing inspection wye/cleanout, the entire side sewer from the property line to the building(s) must be upgraded to meet this standard. + Connection of inspection wye/cleanout assemblies to the existing pipe system shall be made with an approved rubber �,,asketed pipe couplini4. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS Inspection of inspection wye/cleanout installations to ensure that requirements are met. Documentation and record keeping to facilitate future location and use of the inspection wyes/cleanouts. Property access issues allowing use of inspection wyes/cleanouts by the City to assess condition of the side sewer/lateral in the future. May require side sewer permit/utility ordinance clause modifications. Additional administrative costs to initially record and maintain records of inspection wye/cleanout locations. Additional costs associated with permit language and/or ordinance modifications required to establish legal right for Edmonds to access inspection wyes/cleanouts on private property. Additional cost associated with ongoing program of periodic monitoring of side sewer integrity and performance using the inspection wyes/cleanouts. Inspection wye/cleanout testing will be accomplished integrally with the side sewer/lateral test. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 0 Increased costs for added fittings and installation requirements, as well as inspections where standard requirements exceed current requirements 0 Restrictions on development and landscaping required to maintain accessibility to inspection wye/cleanout in the future. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 394 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Inspection of Pipe Installation and Backfill STANDARD NO. S-19 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Inspection of pipe and bedding materials including foundation conditions, pipe laying, bedding and backfill operations is necessary to ensure conformance with the required standards. A visual inspection of connections to the new main line should be performed to verify that no disallowed connections, such as from storm water collection sources, are being made to the system. Without adequate inspection, contractors may take construction shortcuts that result in a substandard pipeline installation. STANDARD + The City of Edmonds shall perform the following inspection activities on pipeline installations: • Inspection of foundation conditions in areas of questionable soils to verify whether over - excavation is required. • Visual inspection of pipe materials and bedding and backfill materials for conformance with standards. • Measurement of compaction and density for conformance with bedding and backfill standards. • Visual inspection of pipe laying operations to ensure pipe has full, uniform support, pipe - jointing process is being properly performed, and compaction operations are not damaging the pipe. • Visual inspection of service connections to the mainline and manholes to verify no surface water collection sources are being connected to the sanitary sewer system. + A minimum of 10% of the pipe length for each project should be inspected as noted above. + Above and beyond the minimum inspection, the City shall make the determination on the required frequency of the inspection based on the qualifications and quality of the contractor performing the work. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS City will need the inspection resources to adequately cover sewer construction work occurring within the agency. • Administrative costs for on -site inspection will increase if the City is not currently inspecting pipe installation and backfill operations. • Inspection of pipe installation and backfill operations ensures installation according to the standards, resulting in a more long-lasting and dependable facility. In the long-term, proper inspection of critical pipeline installation operations can save future maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement costs. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Potential higher ratepayer costs where inspection is not currently being performed. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 395 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Pipe Zone Bedding and Trench Backfill (Side Sewers) STANDARD NO. S-20 �1.,, � I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Side sewers not laid in granular bedding material are subject to potential point loading and/or deflection over time, leading to subsequent damage to the pipe or pipe joint. STANDARD * Side sewer/lateral pipe zone bedding material shall provide uniform support along the entire pipe barrel, without load concentration at joint collars or bells. Bedding material shall be granular material meeting the requirements of Standard Detail S-1. The installed pipe zone bedding material shall effectively separate the side sewer from contact with the native ground and any rocks, pebbles, roots, or other materials that might impose a point load on the side sewer. The pipe zone bedding material shall extend a minimum of 4 inches beyond the outside dimension of the side sewer pipe in all directions. All adjustments to line and grade shall be made by scraping away bedding material or filling with bedding material under the body of the pipe and not be accomplished by blocking or wedging. Disturbed bedding shall be reconsolidated prior to backfill. Pipe zone bedding material shall be compacted to 95 percent maximum density per ASTM D-1557. Bedding shall be placed, spread, and compacted before the pipe is installed so that the pipe is uniformly supported along the barrel. Material shall be worked carefully under and around the pipe haunches and then compacted. * Deviation from the installation requirements noted above is acceptable where written recommendations have been provided by the pipe manufacturer. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS * Site inspection of side sewer bedding and backfill material and installation will be required to insure that requirements are met. * Additional inspection and review time would be required if the City is not currently inspecting side sewer installations and reviewing material submittals. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + Potentially higher costs if builder/developer does not now use good practices in installing side sewers. Potentially higher permit costs for inspections and testing. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 396 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Manhole Leveling Rings STANDARD NO. S-21 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: The manhole grade -adjustment rings for the frame and cover can be a source of infiltration. STANDARD * Materials for grade adjustment of manholes shall consist of precast concrete rings specifically designed for the diameter of the manhole entrance and anticipated loads. Other materials for the rings may be considered provided they provide adequate support, are impermeable, provide a watertight seal, and have a serviceable life expectancy of 50 years or over. * Adjustments of the frame and cover shall be made with precast concrete rings and joined with mortar meeting the requirements of Section 9-04.3 of the WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications or flexible plastic/mastic gaskets. If leveling rings are used that are manufactured from materials other than concrete, the installation of the rings and adjustment to grade shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. * If mortar joints are used, consideration shall be given to infiltration leakage that could occur through the rings. This may include wrapping the full height of the exterior of the manhole rings with a membrane sealing system. * Testing and inspection: If mortar joints are used, they shall be inspected before backfillin . POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS + Additional cost of inspection and testing of the manhole. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + No impacts. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 397 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Root Intrusion STANDARD NO. S-22 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Pipelines that have roots protruding into the pipe have a breach in the piping system at a joint and/or a break in the pipe. This breach is a potential source for infiltration. Cutting of the roots inside the pipe and treatment with a root -inhibiting chemical will not remove infiltration. Root intrusion can cause operational problems by plugging the sewer and will likely need to be corrected to address this problem. STANDARD * When roots are found in sewer piping and manholes, the point of entry shall be located by CCTV. If infiltration occurs at the point of root intrusion it shall be evaluated for removal during the wet season when surrounding soils are fully saturated. Correction of infiltration caused by roots can be accomplished by performing a spot repair by either a conventional dig and repair or using a trenchless repair method. * If the segment of sewer indicates potential for additional root intrusion, consideration shall be given to replacing the sewer using either dig and replace or trenchless methods. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Added cost to test and repair the entire section of main from manhole -to -manhole. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Added cost due to increased cost to maintain system. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 398 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Root Intrusion (Side Sewers) STANDARD NO. S-23 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Side sewers that have roots protruding in the pipe have a breach in the piping system either at a joint and/or a break in the pipe. This breach is a potential source for infiltration. STANDARD For any sewer system rehabilitation work on side sewers or laterals, root intrusion shall be addressed by evaluating removal of the roots and repair or replacement of the side sewer/lateral at the point of root intrusion. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ The costs of pipe repair will be incurred if the rehabilitation is financed by the City. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS * Pipe repair activities may cause inconveniences from service disruptions or construction activities. * The cost of rehabilitation will be incurred if financed by the property owner. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 399 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Pipeline Leak Testing STANDARD NO. S-24 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Several aspects of sewer main pipe installation, if not properly designed and constructed, may result in infiltration entering the finished pipeline. Leakage testing of the assembled sewer pipeline immediately following construction is one of the final opportunities for verification that the pipeline meets acceptable I/I criteria prior to being placed into service. Leakage testing of newly installed replacement sewer mains may not be feasible because active side sewers are being installed on the new line as construction progresses. For these cases, CCTV inspection of the completed line will be required in lieu of a leakage test. STANDARD Acceptance criteria for substantial completion following construction of new and rehabilitated pipelines shall include testing requirements to ensure that the sewer pipelines and connections to the sewer pipelines, as constructed, meet specified leakage limitations. Where new sewer mains can be isolated from active flow, the pipeline shall be tested by either a water test or a low pressure air test. For those cases where flow cannot be routed around the new main, the pipeline shall be CCTV inspected for leakage. * The water test shall be an infiltration test if the sewer main is installed below the groundwater level. The water test shall be an exfiltration test if the sewer main is installed above the groundwater level. Testing shall be in accordance with the WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications. * Low pressure air testing shall conform to the requirements of the WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications. * Where wastewater flow cannot be routed around the new main as construction progresses, the pipeline shall be CCTV inspected for leakage. While under warranty, it is recommended that a visual inspection for leakage be performed during the wet season when surrounding soils are fully saturated. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS Possible additional cost and additional staffing requirements for acceptance and inspection verification. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Potentially higher ratepayer costs for increased visual inspection/verification requirements. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 400 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Sanitary Side Sewer Inspection STANDARD NO. S-25 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: A visual inspection of the private side sewer is needed before it is backfilled or covered to ensure that pipe materials meet specifications, the pipe is properly supported, and that storm water drains and subsoil drains are not connected to the sanitary sewer. STANDARD $ No trench shall be filled nor any side sewer covered until the work has been inspected, tested and approved by the City of Edmonds. The City may require that any work covered be uncovered, or tested by a recognized independent testing laboratory (at the expense of the permittee), to ensure that the work has been accomplished in accordance with the permit. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 49 Inspection standards for private side sewers would need to include a provision for a visual inspection of each side sewer before it is backfilled or covered. Additional inspection effort would be required if the City is not currently inspecting each side sewer. City inspection forms should include verification of the visual inspection including date, time and the name of the inspector. 0 Tighter coordination of inspection timing may be required. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS is Permit fees for side sewer installation could increase to finance inspection costs. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 401 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Side Sewer/Lateral Leak Testing STANDARD NO. S-26 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Several aspects of side sewer/lateral pipe installation, if not properly designed and constructed, may result in infiltration entering the finished pipeline. Leakage testing of the assembled side sewer/lateral immediately following construction is the final opportunity for verification that the pipeline meets acceptable I/I criteria prior to being placed into service. It is also beneficial to test side sewer/lateral pipelines after a significant period of service to confirm that as -built conditions have not degraded due to material failures, bedding or backfill settlement, or other causes. STANDARD + Acceptance criteria following construction shall include testing requirements to ensure that both new and rehabilitated side sewer/laterals and connections, as constructed, meet specified leakage limitations. All new side sewer/laterals shall be tested by either a water test or a low pressure air test. + The water test shall be an infiltration test if the side sewer/lateral is installed below the groundwater level. The water test shall be an exfiltration test if the side sewer/lateral is installed above the groundwater level. Testing shall be in conformance with WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications. The downstream end of the private side sewer/lateral shall be plugged to isolate the private side sewer/lateral from the public side sewer/lateral stub and the building plumbing when water testing methods are employed. + Low pressure air testing shall conform to the requirements of the WSDOT/APWA Standard Specifications. The downstream end of the private side sewer/lateral shall be plugged to isolate the private side sewer/lateral from the public side sewer/lateral stub and the building plumbing when low-pressure air testing methods are employed. + Where a rehabilitated lateral/side sewer cannot be water tested or low pressure air tested, the pipeline shall be CCTV inspected for leakage at its connection point to the sewer main. The inspection for leakage shall be performed during the wet season when surrounding soils are fully saturated. + On publicly funded rehabilitation projects, additional testing at the completion of the warranty period to establish the continued integrity of the side sewer/lateral shall be required. Since water testing or low-pressure air testing of side sewer/laterals after they have been put into service is problematic, visual inspection using CCTV shall be conducted as the most effective practical testing method available for confirming that warranty requirements have been met. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Possible additional cost and additional staffing requirements for acceptance and warranty testing verification. + Possible additional construction cost to account for acceptance and warranty testing requirements. + Potential additional cost to conduct CCTV Inspection and /or review inspection data at the end of the warranty period. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS Increased permit costs for added testing requirements, as well as inspections, where standard requirements exceed current requirements. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 402 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Manhole Leak Inspection STANDARD NO. S-27 UI CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Several aspects of sewer manhole installation, if not properly designed and constructed, may result in infiltration entering the finished sewer system. Leakage inspection of the assembled manhole during the first wet season following construction is the best opportunity for verification that the manhole meets acceptable I/I criteria prior to being placed into service. A final visual inspection for manhole leakage to confirm that as -built conditions have not degraded due to material failures, bedding or backfill settlement, or other causes needs to be performed at the end of the STANDARD + Acceptance criteria following construction on new and rehabilitated manholes shall include a visual inspection to ensure that the manholes and connections to the manholes, as constructed, are watertight. Groundwater level shall be allowed to return to its normal elevation before performing the inspection. It is recommended that the visual inspection for manhole leakage be performed during the wet season when surrounding soils are fully saturated. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Possible additional cost and additional staffing requirements for visual inspections. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + Potentially higher ratepayer costs for increased inspection requirements. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 403 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Product Specific Inspection STANDARD NO. S-28 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Products used in sewer system construction for both new and rehabilitation improvements can fail and lead to I/I due to improper installation and/or the use of non -specified products being installed. Without inspection, there are no assurances the product installed is the one specified and installed properly. STANDARD + Product inspection is the visual verification of product test results and/or confirmation that an approved product is the one being installed, and that the sequence of construction or application is appropriate. Verify the approved product is being installed in accordance with approved specifications. This includes pipe, fittings, bedding, and rehabilitation products. It is important to distinguish the difference between inspection and testing. Those products covered under the testing standard shall have those tests performed to verify compliance. + Pipe shall be inspected at the point of installation to verify that it has factory markings identifying the type and class of pipe. Unlabeled products will not be approved for installation. + Pipe fittings shall be inspected at the point of installation to confirm they meet the specifications. Pipe bedding material shall be inspected at the time of installation to be appropriate for the type of pipe (flexible or rigid). For rehabilitation products, the manufacturer's recommended installation procedure shall be reviewed prior to installation. An installation list with references shall be provided documenting recent projects where the product has been installed. Contact references and document the installation and operational experiences with the product. Conduct any additional investigations determined necessary for approval of the product and installation. If through this review the product appears acceptable, the installation requirements shall be documented from the review process along with anv testing requirements of the installation. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS • Added cost for increased inspection. • Additional qualification investigation for proposed rehabilitation products. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Potentially higher ratepayer costs where product specific inspection is currently not being performed. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 404 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Product Specific Inspection (Side Sewers) STANDARD NO. S-29 V� UI CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Side sewer system products in both new and rehabilitation improvements can fail and lead to I/I due to improper installation and/or non -specified products being installed. Without inspection, there are no assurances the product installed is the one specified and was installed properly. STANDARD • Product inspection is the visual verification of product test results and/or confirmation that an approved product is the one being installed, and the sequence of construction or application is appropriate. All products being installed shall be inspected to verify the approved product is being installed in accordance with approved specifications. This includes pipe, fittings, bedding, and rehabilitation products. It is important to distinguish the difference between inspection and testing. Those products covered under the testing standard shall have those tests performed to verify compliance. • Pipe shall be inspected at the point of installation to verify that it has factory markings identifying the type and class of pipe. Unlabeled products will not be approved for installation. • Pipe fittings shall be inspected at the point of installation to confirm they meet the specifications. • Pipe bedding material shall be inspected at the time of installation to confirm the material is appropriate for the type of pipe (flexible or rigid). • For rehabilitation products, the manufacturer's recommended installation procedure shall be reviewed prior to installation. An installation list with references shall be provided documenting recent projects where the product has been installed recently. The Edmonds shall contact references and document the installation and operational experiences with the product, and conduct any additional investigations determined necessary for approval of the product and installation. If through this review the product appears acceptable, the installation requirements shall be documented from the review process along with any testing requirements of the installation. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS • Added cost for increased inspection. • Additional qualification investigation for proposed rehabilitation products. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Potential for increased inspection costs. 0 Possible extension of construction schedule to accommodate inspection requirements. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 405 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: CCTV Inspection STANDARD NO. S-30 UI CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Television inspection of newly installed and rehabilitated sewers provides documentation of lateral connections, confirms pipe joints are properly pushed home, and identifies infiltration and internal defects. STANDARD + A complete internal television inspection shall be performed on newly installed and rehabilitated sewers. An audio-visual digital recording of the inspection, compatible with the City of Edmonds's existing audio-visual format, shall be retained by the City. The television inspection shall be conducted following trench backfill and compaction, cleaning and testing. Groundwater level shall be allowed to return to its normal elevation before performing the inspection. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Additional camera equipment and inspection time would be required, unless contracted with an outside vendor. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS • Television inspection of the lateral ensures there are no internal defects, potentially reducing future private property owner maintenance requirements due to improper installation. • Potentially higher ratepayer costs for increased CCTV inspection requirements. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 406 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: CCTV Inspection (Side Sewers) STANDARD NO. S-31 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Television inspection of newly installed and rehabilitated side sewers provides documentation of connections, confirms pipe joints are properly pushed home, and identifies infiltration defects and inflow sources. STANDARD A televised inspection of the connection of new and rehabilitated lateral/side sewers to the sewer main shall be performed where the lateral/side sewer cannot be pressure tested. An audio-visual digital recording of the inspection, compatible with the City of Edmonds's existing audio-visual format, shall be retained by the City. If camera access through a lateral test Wye cannot be provided, the video camera equipment shall have a separate side -casting camera that allows inspection of the lateral. The television inspection shall be conducted following trench backfill and compaction, cleaning and testing. If dewatering was required for side sewer installation, the groundwater level shall be allowed to return to its normal elevation before performing the POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Additional inspection time to CCTV the lateral/side sewer and connection would be required, unless contracted with an outside vendor. $ Equipment costs for new CCTV camera equipment capable of inspecting lateral/side sewers may be required, unless contracted with an outside vendor. $ An increase in lateral/side sewers costs will result if the City is currently not requiring the contractor to perform CCTV inspections. POTENTIAL PROPERTY OWNER/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ CCTV inspection requirements will increase the total cost of lateral/side sewer installations. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 407 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program WARRANTY TITLE: Certification, Warranty and Oualifications STANDARD NO. S-32 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Some new construction and/or rehabilitation products or application systems may not have a proven track record of performance, yet offer attractive benefits or low costs which merit their use. A product specific certification can be used to protect the City of Edmonds's investment. Every construction or rehabilitation project requires a period within which defects in construction or materials should be allowed to become evident before the contractor, supplier or manufacturer ceases to have responsibility for the project. A stipulated warranty length can be used to protect the City's investment. Conventional construction products and methods should be warranted for a period of at least one year. Unconventional or newer products and methods could be warranted for a longer period, from 2 to 5 years, as determined by the City's Engineer. A formal procedure for qualifying a manufacturer or contractor can be used to protect the City's investment. Qualifications information to be supplied during bidding may include a summary of the firm's history, itemization of a number of recent, similar projects with descriptions, amounts, names and experience of specific firm representatives, and names/phone numbers of owner references. It is vital that the certification, warranty and qualification requirements and procedures be fully described in the contract documents to be enforceable with the contractors and suppliers. STANDARD + When a new construction and/or rehabilitation product or application system does not have a documented record of comparable prior successful installations, the supplier of the product or system shall be required to provide certification that the product or system will perform as specified. + The certification shall provide for the complete replacement of the product or system by the contractor if the product or system is found to be defective when installed or applied by a certified agent of the manufacturer. + Each new construction and/or rehabilitation project shall include a warranty period of at least one year. Longer periods may be stipulated as determined by the City of Edmonds based on the nature of the work. + Testing requirements at the end of the warranty period shall be consistent with those used to determine initial project acceptance. + The City of Edmonds may determine that specific qualifications for the manufacturer or contractor be included in the evaluation of bids received. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS + Staff or consultant Engineer will need to spend time to research and develop a certification period as well as a means for determining compliance. + Verification of certification requirements during the submittal process will be required. 0 Inspection during construction to monitor installation/application will increase staffing requirements. + Follow-up time by staff to monitor product or system performance may delay project completion and may increase staff requirements. + Potential for additional project cost by manufacturer or contractor. Staff or consultant Engineer needs to determine appropriate qualification procedures. Staff or consultant Engineer needs to determine appropriate length of warranty period. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 408 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program + Legal and engineering effort to establish acceptable pre -qualification requirements will be greater. * Additional engineering and legal costs during design and bid periods are likely to occur. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 0 Potentially higher ratepayer costs for certifications and longer warranty periods. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 409 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Bonding and Warranty Inspection STANDARD NO. S-33 UI CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: One critical element of a warranty is verification of the improvement prior to the end of the warranty period so that construction deficiencies can be accomplished and paid for via the performance bond. Thus the system can be repaired and I/I eliminated. STANDARD + A warranty period shall be established on publicly funded projects for each side sewer project, or for each project containing a side sewer construction component. This warranty period shall be a minimum of one year in length. + All side sewer pipes shall be CCTV inspected after 80% of the warranty period has expired but before the end of the warranty period. Defective portions of the system shall be repaired to meet all applicable I/I standards. + A written record shall be made of acceptance of the improvement with the date and results of the inspections and testing. This shall be submitted to the City of Edmonds prior to release of the performance bond. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Additional CCTV inspection and enforcement of the warranty. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 0 Potential of added costs for inspections and verifications. Possible schedule delay to allow for verifications. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 410 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) PUBLIC EDUCATION �,...r,.., ... I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Community Education and Involvement — The I/1 Control Program will result in the expenditure of public funds. There will be an array of inquiries, complaints, questions and suggestions from the general public, ratepayers, tenants and property owners. The manner in which these are tracked and resolved will have a major impact upon the public perception of the I/I Control Program. For acceptance as a necessary public program, members of the public will need to understand the purposes of the program, and its benefits to the community and to individual property owners and rate payers. POLICY 1 The City of Edmonds shall create and promote educational programs to introduce the general public to I/I as an issue, to explain the potential benefits from I/I mitigation efforts, and to inform the public of their responsibilities related to the I/I problem. Educational/informational materials shall be designed to present issues in a format suitable for use by the general public. Materials prepared for King County's Regional 1/1 Control Program may also be utilized. EXPLANATION $ Public education is key to successfully addressing 1/1 from private property. $ The public's knowledge about storm and sanitary sewer systems and, in particular, I/I issues, is limited. Generating understanding of a program of this complexity is necessary in order to gain public support. $ An education program would explain the benefits of I/I reductions to: • the county -wide sewer system • the costs and benefits to the public, and • the benefits to private property owners. 0 A central clearinghouse operated by King County is anticipated that would establish and publicize educational programs. Its operation is intended to help establish and maintain system- wide policies and standards. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS * The City could establish its own program or utilize the King County clearinghouse (once established). * Using trained customer service representatives who use consistent approaches would buffer the City from dissatisfied individuals. * It would allow for the wide distribution of contact information for I/I projects. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + An awareness that changes in managing sewer and storm water are about to take place. + Materials can be carefully tailored to areas with problems and geared to specific Edmonds needs. + Ongoing Public Education — In order to maintain the rehabilitated sewer system, the property owner will need to be reminded of the importance of keeping major landscaping and buildings out of the utility maintenance easement area. $ Interested parties would not have to search for whom to contact regarding the work to be, or being, done on their property. It might reduce the frustration of dealing with a "bureaucracy". On the other hand, those who continue to be dissatisfied may turn to local political representatives or agency managers for more satisfactory relief. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 411 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Community Relations — Specific Project Community Education and Involvement I/I reduction projects will disrupt public and private property. There will be an array of inquiries, complaints, questions and suggestions from the general public, ratepayers, tenants and property owners. The manner in which these are tracked and resolved will have a major impact upon the perception of the I/I Control Program. For acceptance of specific I/I reduction projects, members of the public need to understand the purposes of the project, its benefits to the community and to individual property owners. POLICY 2 For each specific I/I reduction project, the City of Edmonds shall be responsible for community education/involvement. EXPLANATION The City needs to be responsible for community relations, since it is most familiar with the specifics of the project and most aware of community concerns. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 4 The City would implement the local design and implementation of project -related educational and community involvement material. + Public education will have to be carefully tailored to areas with problems. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + Individuals might feel that their elected local representatives would be more understanding and sympathetic to their concerns since materials are geared to their specific needs by the City. $ If an individual disagreed with a staff member's decision, a local problem resolution process may be more convenient and familiar. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 412 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) FINANCING I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Public Funding and Scope of Work The extent of public intervention and assistance in reducing or eliminating I/I from private properties will be shaped by a series of public policy choices. Some of the choices, like incorporating extensive surface and sub -surface restoration of private property, may require a series of adjunct policies. Other approaches may require only minor modification of local codes and regulations. POLICY 3 Public funding shall be considered for all phases of I/I mitigation work on privately owned property. Funded work should include elements such as: permits, investigation, inspection and testing, any modifications to the side sewer connections and laterals, connections to public systems, restoration of disturbed areas (including landscaping, sidewalks, driveways, and rights -of -way) and post -rehabilitation testing and enforcement. Environmentally infeasible &/or prohibitively expensive modifications should be considered for variances/waivers. EXPLANATION 4 Because maintenance and operation of the sanitary sewer system is for the public health and welfare, ensuring the elimination (or major reduction of) excessive I/I is usually considered a legitimate use of public funds. $ This alternative focuses on all types of private property, including residential commercial, and industry. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS Given the expenditure required for public funding of an extensive program, the I/I Control Program would probably be initiated in selected mini basins (or smaller areas) with excessive 1/1 flow rates and with cost-effective solutions. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS * Property owners in a selected area would have to participate in this program. * Utility rates would increase to pay for the 1/1 mitigation work; although substantial grant funding could reduce the burden on the local rate base. * With full funding, issues such as constructing the program to accommodate economic hardship (of specific individuals as well as for customer classes such as those with fixed and low-income) would not be necessary. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 413 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Rates, Incentives & Surcharges An effective I/I Reduction Program will be a significant additional expense to the City. Equitable means for generating the necessary funds should be considered. POLICY 4 The City of Edmonds shall develop a funding mechanism for the I/I Reduction Program that includes a combination of adjustment to rates, addition of surcharges and/or incentives to property owners. EXPLANATION * If I/I reduction is found to be necessary for a large part of the City, a dedicated rate increase could be adopted. + For areas where I/I reduction is necessary but infeasible due to issues such as areas prone to flooding, unstable slopes, or lack of a storm water conveyance system, a surcharge to ratepayers in the area could be adopted, and the funds utilized in other areas of the sewer system. * Incentivized programs could be developed where property owners could be reimbursed for installing City -approved I/I reduction measures. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 4 Council action required to authorize the funding mechanisms; commensurate City staff time to develop recommendations. + City staff time and costs to develop and manage any incentivized programs. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + Ratepayers would see increased costs reflecting the additional expense to the City. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 414 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Cost Sharing An effective I/I Reduction Program will be a significant additional expense to the City. Equitable means for generating the necessary funds should be considered. POLICY 5 The City of Edmonds shall develop a funding mechanism for the I/I Reduction Program that includes a combination of City revenues coupled with funding from local (LID) and State sources, such as grants and loans. EXPLANATION * City and property owners in an area slated for an I/I Reduction project could share costs by means of a Local Improvement District or similar structure. * City and State could share costs of an I/I Reduction project or projects using existing State grant/loan programs such as Public Works Trust Fund, Centennial Clean Water Fund, etc. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS * City staff time and expense participating in LID. * City staff time and expense (or consultant) in preparing appropriate grant/loan applications and administering resulting funds per State requirements. * City staff time and expense in working with State agencies to modify grant/loan program rules allowing for I/I Reduction projects, as required. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS Cost to property owners could be mitigated by appropriate cost -sharing for project implementation. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 415 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) I/I DISCHARGE SITE CONDITIONS I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Stormwater Drainage Ordinance If storm water is diverted away from the existing sanitary sewer system, then alternatives may need to be found for the diverted storm water. Property owners and the City of Edmonds may need new options for surface and ground water drainage management. POLICY 6 Where I/I work on private or public property results in the diversion of storm water drainage, and there exists a storm water system, then the I/I work shall involve meeting the provisions of the City's current "storm water drainage" ordinances. Jurisdictional approval must be obtained. EXPLANATION $ In areas with an existing public storm water management system, all drainage diverted from the sewer system could be discharged into the storm water system, provided that: • The jurisdiction controlling the public storm water system approves the connection; and • There are sound design options, capacity and gravity flow. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS • The capacity of the storm water system would have to be evaluated and a determination made regarding these new loads. Portions of the storm water systems may have to be upgraded. The costs for engineering analysis and design, construction and connections may be significant. Grants from the County's Surface Water Utility or the Public Works Trust Fund might help defray the cost of new and/or expanded storm water systems. • This policy assumes that public funds for the removal of I/I would pay for the permits, engineering and other expenses associated with connecting storm water to a public system. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ This will likely improve drainage and water intrusion problems for the affected homes and properties. The cost of the lines and connections to the storm water system will depend upon individual conditions. 4 Potential increased storm water costs, including costs to connect to the storm sewer system. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 416 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) 1/1 CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: On -site Storm Drainage Management If storm water is diverted away from the existing sanitary sewer system, then alternatives may need to be found for the diverted storm water. Property owners and the City of Edmonds may need new options for surface and ground water drainage management. POLICY 7 Where I/I work on private property results in the diversion of storm water and an adequate storm water system does not exist, then the private property owner bears responsibility for discharging the storm water drainage to an appropriate location. Where 1/1 work on public property results in the diversion of storm water and an adequate storm water system does not exist, the City of Edmonds bears the responsibility for discharging the storm water drainage to an appropriate location. EXPLANATION Connecting residential storm water systems to the public sewer system is illegal. Therefore, illicit connections should be removed. Properties with impermeable and semi -permeable surfaces have storm water drainage requirements. For example: most roofs and driveways, lawns and hard packed soils don't allow for storm water absorption, retention or evaporation. Alternative practices can be used to reduce or eliminate the need for off site storm water systems. For example: • Surface and ground water drainage can be collected and directed to location(s) on the property where the water can drain into the ground by means of an energy dissipation basin (French drain). The feasibility and effectiveness of such systems depend upon its design, lot size and topography, soil type and local area conditions. The complexity of energy dissipation basins will also depend upon local conditions and drainage requirements. • Poor maintenance can increase and exacerbate storm water problems. Tree limbs that overhang houses tend to increase the need for gutter and drain line cleaning/maintenance. Improper soil drainage at the perimeter of structures can increase basement and crawl space flooding. • Special landscaping practices can increase storm water absorption and retention. • Roofs with a planted sod layer can hold and evaporate storm water. • Driveways can be made out of porous pavers and other materials that allow for water absorption. • Rain barrels and cisterns can be used to recycle storm water for gardening and some domestic use. • Ponds can be used to hold and evaporate storm water. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS • Design and construction review may be required. As a first measure, this could be a lower cost alternative for the City than side sewer repair. If properly designed, constructed and inspected, once in place, there would be little impact. • Reduction of storm water flow into the sanitary and storm water system. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 417 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS Appropriate management of storm water flow on private property could have direct benefits to the homeowners and the public sanitary and storm water systems, such as: • Proper use of on -site storm water management systems would likely result in dryer homes, basements and crawl spaces. • Dryer homes tend to have fewer problems with wood destroying organisms, mold and mildew. Dryer homes have longer lasting furnaces, roofing and interior surfaces. • Many of the defects that are likely to be found in such inspections have low cost and low impact solutions. Such on site systems usually don't require extensive digging or interference with decks or in -ground systems such as water lines or oil tanks. • When properly designed, they require a modest amount of maintenance. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 418 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) 1/1 CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: On -site Storm Drainage Management If storm water is diverted away from the existing sanitary sewer system, then alternatives may need to be found for the diverted storm water. Property owners and the City of Edmonds may need new options for surface and ground water drainage management. POLICY 8 Where an I/I reduction project results in the diversion of storm water drainage (e.g., removal of illicit connections), and the modifications required to properly discharge the storm water are deemed to be infeasible &/or prohibitively expensive (for the property owner), consider giving the property owner a choice of disconnection of illicit connection or surcharge. EXPLANATION Connecting residential storm water systems to the public sewer system is illegal. Therefore, illicit connections should be removed. However, if re-routing the storm water drainage, to either a public storm water management system or another appropriate location is deemed infeasible &/or prohibitively expensive (for the property owner), the alternative of a surcharge may be offered. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ If a property owner chooses to pay a surcharge, rather than to disconnect an illicit connection, utility rate revenue will increase. + Additional administrative processes will be necessary. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ A private property owner with an illicit connection may have the opportunity to reduce the cost of compliance. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 419 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Contractor Qualifications A critical success factor for reducing I/I is to make sure contractors have experience using acceptable materials and skilled labor resources to perform construction and I/I rehabilitation of public sewer systems. One way to assure the qualifications of the contractors is through a review of their past performance and bonding and financial ability, and of the experience of their key supervisory staff. Contractor qualifications often become an issue during the selection process on public projects since the primary basis of award is "Low Bid". POLICY 9 The City of Edmonds shall develop in the bid specifications specific minimum experience requirements for contractors to ensure that the contractor hired will have experience in the type of work they are to perform. EXPLANATION 4 The ability to require contractors to meet certain minimum experience conditions can result in better I/I reduction projects. $ Prior experience with specialized sewer technologies is necessary to ensure correct handling and application of these technologies. Prior experience with construction such as tunnels, systems restoration/rehabilitation, and deep excavation is also necessary. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS + Assures higher quality work coupled with realistic bids and less chance for disputes. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 4 Assurance of quality systems, lower potential for future repair/replacement. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 420 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) I/1 CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: I/1 Reduction Projects — Permits Permits and conditions are usually required on I/I reduction projects. Responsibility for obtaining these permits can vary. POLICY 10 The City of Edmonds shall obtain all permits feasible, including the SEPA, HPA, 404, or other State or Federally required permits. The contractor shall obtain permits as detailed in the specifications such as the building, road or utility, ROW use, &/or clearing and grading permits. The permits required to be obtained by the contractor shall be specifically listed in the bidding documents. EXPLANATION $ Several permits may be required for work on I/I reduction projects. Project environmental permits should be obtained by the City, while permits such as building, utility and ROW should be obtained by the contractor. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 0 The City would be responsible for obtaining those permits not specifically related to construction as part of its administrative duties. + Potentially higher program cost. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS Permits and conditions associated with permits help assure that public concerns and issues are addressed and mitigated. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 421 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTION I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Rehabilitation Planning and Oversight — Inspection and Testing Initial and follow-up inspection and investigation of the condition and installation of public sewer lines and private sewer and storm drainage connections is a key to ensuring that neither inflow nor infiltration is occurring. The type and extent of inspection and investigation could vary depending upon the focus, extent and the approach selected to remove I/I from privately owned property and public sewer lines. POLICY I i The City of Edmonds shall provide training opportunities on the I/I Control Program to its representatives. The training material will include a checklist of guidelines for best practices and the adopted I/I Control Standards, Procedures & Policies. The City's efforts should be coordinated with training provided by King County (as available) under its Regional I/I Control Program. EXPLANATION Because inspections are such an integral part of controlling I/I from private property, specially trained staff would ensure that the inspections occur with consistency and uniformity. + The inspections could include a variety of tasks, such as: checking all connections, testing all lines, verifying the functionality of on -site and/or off -site storm drainage management, and ensuring restoration of sidewalks, driveways and rights of way. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 4 Adequate staff time for training. Side sewer permits would be expanded to include the entire residential drainage system. 0 Coordination between areas of responsibilities would be key, for example, building permits and sewer permits; inspectors and paving crews; sewer maintenance/storm water maintenance and inspectors; and inspectors and maintenance, engineering and CIP personnel. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS * The property owner's contractor would remain responsible for ensuring work performed on private residential property meets code and has been "signed off' by the City's "I/I Control Inspector". * The cost of this expanded inspection and testing service could be included in the City's base rate or within a newly created I/I rate component. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 422 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Post -Rehabilitation Management — Restoration Many of the private property I/I mitigation options can interfere with private property conditions, especially buildings, site work and landscaping. Restoration of these disturbed areas could be expensive and complicated. A poorly understood or badly managed restoration policy and program could lead to significant public distrust, concerns, and problems. A policy is required that outlines the roles, responsibilities and any limits on such restoration work. POLICY 12 If confirmed by legal counsel. The City of Edmonds shall establish a standard for property restoration before initiating any I/I work (including landscaping, sidewalks, and driveways). Public property restoration is governed by City of Edmonds codes and ordinances. Options can include: 1 — "Restoration as near as possible to pre -construction condition" 2 — "Basing value on restoration to as near as possible to pre -construction condition, consider up front property owner payment with signed waiver" EXPLANATION $ Some amount of restoration of private properties would be part of the I/I reduction program. $ Prior to the start of any I/I work, the property would be inspected and photographed, and relevant improvements and conditions would be thoroughly documented. 4 The public funds used for this purpose would compensate for all of the agreed -to restoration work or up -front payment in recognition of the public benefits derived from the I/I program. $ Since certain plant/vegetation types are not easily restored, a "restoration to pre -construction condition" standard is not always possible. 0 Disagreements would use the preferred method as chosen from the alternatives under Policy 2. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS + A more complex program that recognizes the impact of the I/I program upon private property. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS * Impacted Property Owners — Depending on the choice made, property impacts could be small to large, but property owner would receive rehabilitated side sewer. * Ratepayers — Increases the cost of the I/I Control Program and therefore might result in higher rates. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 423 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) WARRANTY �,...r, „ ...;� I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Contractor Bonding, Licensing and Warranty POLICY 13 The City of Edmonds shall be responsible for ensuring that, for publicly funded I/I reduction projects, the construction contract includes appropriate bonding, licensing, insurance, and warranty provisions to ensure satisfactory completion of the project and warranty of the project for a sufficient amount of time (recommended minimum 12 months). EXPLANATION $ Contractors for public projects must be licensed, bonded and insured. For publicly funded projects, agencies generally establish standards for contractor bonding, end of project retainage, and warranties that ensure the completed facilities will continue to function as intended for a reasonable period of time. $ A schedule of required contractor warranties would be established at the beginning of a project. For example, pipe performance would have a longer warranty requirement than pumps. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ A "retainage" could be required to be held back after "substantial completion" of the work. The retainage would be released once all punch list items have been completed and final inspections performed. $ Bonding, retainage and warranties reduce the likelihood of poor work and future maintenance/repair requirements. $ All contractors could be required to maintain a performance bond equal to a pre -determined percentage of the project cost. $ Such standards increase contractor costs and prices. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 4 Higher up front costs, but lower maintenance costs. + Better quality control of the 1/1 work. + Any allowed "do it yourself' work would most likely not be subject to bonding or warranty requirements. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 424 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) PRIVATE PROPERTY / LEGAL I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Rehab Planning, Oversight, Inspection, Monitoring and Testing — Right of Entry With specific exceptions, individuals cannot enter or alter property owned by another individual without explicit permission (authority for utility representatives to access private premises for the purpose of inspecting and determining code compliance can be legislated for public health and welfare). Yet initial follow-up and inspection of the condition and installation of public sewer lines and private sewer and storm drainage connections is a key to ensuring that I/1 is not occurring. New standards need to be developed to ensure that the system remains intact and maintained. The right of entry for purposes other than verification of code compliance usually requires either a written agreement between the public entity and the private property owner or a notice of potential legal action. POLICY 14 The City of Edmonds shall pass the necessary ordinances/resolutions and develop the appropriate access agreements that allow its agents to gain access to private property, such as a right of entry or a construction and inspection easement. These agreements will allow certain actions related to I/I reduction and control, such as conducting a side sewer and/or lateral inspection; construction rehabilitation; or conducting code enforcement activities. EXPLANATION $ The right of entry to verify code compliance is usually limited in several ways, the most basic of which is that entry must occur at reasonable times. This and other limiting provisions listed below may be adopted by the City's administration. • Entry only by individuals with "proper" identification; • Entry only with prior notice; • Entry only with written information regarding the nature of the inspection and with the findings of the investigation (notice of non-compliance with specific portions of the code; notice of remedies and/or potential penalties). 4 The method(s) used for code compliance enforcement, inspection and testing or monitoring is not implicitly or explicitly included in this basic right of entry. $ Right of entry agreements, easements and legal notices will vary in complexity and scope of action though with legal advice some basic policy procedures can be drafted and used in routine actions. Unique agreements would be drafted for complex or unusual situations. General delimiters for access agreements include scope of public action, result of property damage or personal injury, and hold harmless and indemnification provisions. Administrative use of these legal instruments depends upon the authority granted by the Edmonds City Council. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS Allows the flexibility for the City to select and implement its preferred programmatic approach (e.g., all new side sewers could be located in an easement area that allows for future entry by the City to perform inspections and work without a separate right -of -entry agreement; side sewer permits could be expanded to include the entire residential drainage system). The City may undertake different actions according to its I/I reduction projects and applicable local regulations. Since most municipalities' codes allow only sewerage to enter the sanitary sewer system, using the basic right of entry to investigate code compliance could be the first 5/12/2010 Packet Page 425 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) action to control improper inflow from private property. Once the initial I/I control remedies are in place, periodic investigation of code compliance may involve increased resources such as: inspectors, code compliance officers, engineers and/or attorneys. Record keeping would be crucial to track follow-up actions and inspection schedules. $ Utility storm water and sanitary sewer codes may have to be amended to include right -of -entry authority. 0 The ease or difficulty of obtaining specific right -of -entry agreements or easements will depend on the property's I/I contribution to the system and the Policies and Standards of the I/I Control Program, e.g., the scope of work or the amount of restoration. $ Coordination between areas of responsibilities would be key, e.g., building permits and sewer permits; building and utility inspectors; maintenance, engineering and CIP personnel. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Many individuals may not realize that municipal representatives have the authority to enter their property to perform code compliance inspections. Municipal employees and legislators may have to cope with a range of reactions from accommodation to active resistance. These actions can be anticipated and a plan of action established. $ The types of private improvements (and landscaping) in the easement area should be restricted to simplify and standardize any future side sewer work and to prevent side sewer deterioration. There should be restrictions to the property owner making changes in side sewer location when remodeling occurs. 4 For new construction the residential property owner's contractor would remain responsible for the work performed meeting code, and that it is "signed off' by the City's inspector. $ The cost of permits could increase to cover the increased intensity of service or the cost could be absorbed within the general residential rate base. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 426 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) 1/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Rehabilitation Planning and Oversight — Liability All phases of the I/I work on privately owned property could create liability issues. Some liability issues such as negligence, are a recognized concern. Side sewer and other excavation on private property may result in some special liability issues. The standards of work and documentation of conditions on private land are more varied than those found on public property and public right-of-ways. Potential liability matters may be limited in various ways. POLICY 15 If public resources support any portion of the I/I reduction work on privately owned property, then the City of Edmonds shall establish a process to manage and limit its liability. The potential site and in - ground liability issues shall be a part of the I/I planning and design process, including an up -front agreement on when the jurisdiction's liability will begin and end. EXPLANATION + When digging on private land, various types of unexpected conditions and systems are likely to be found, for example: underground oil tanks and contaminated soils, sprinkler systems and water lines, "invisible" dog fences, non -conforming in -use wells and septic systems, electrical and data cables, etc. Some of these conditions and systems are likely to be found in the areas of any side sewer work and pose a liability issue to the homeowner, contractor, governmental agency and/or the general public. $ Field reports suggest that about 25% of oil tanks leak. If contaminated soil is found during an excavation, then remediation is required and the issue of liability would have to be addressed. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS * Pre -digging protocols such as inspections to identify underground infrastructures and/or contaminated soil could reduce the potential liability disputes and costs. * Resolution of disputes may become an issue that will need to be addressed by City staff and/or their attorneys. * The City will need to work closely with the homeowners, no matter what. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS Property owners may refuse permission to inspect or test for potential liability issues and might prefer not to know about such issues. + Property owners may end up having to address the problem of soil contamination. + Property owners will desire that the work minimize disruption to existing property improvements and landscaping. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 427 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Legislative Action Requirements In order to implement effective I/I reduction on private property, specific building codes enacted at the State level may need to be amended. POLICY 16 The City of Edmonds shall work to develop amended Statewide building codes to facilitate the implementation of effective I/I reduction measures. EXPLANATION 4- Certain Statewide building codes, such as the State Plumbing Code, allow for items such as sump pumps and footing drains to be installed within the footprint of the building and do not specify where the resulting water is to be discharged. Code language may need to be amended to require discharge to a storm sewer (non -sanitary) system or location. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS City staff time and expense working with the State Legislature and Trade Organizations. City expense could be reduced and message more effectively delivered through MWPAAC. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + Additional cost to the property owner as reflected in developer/contractor costs. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 428 of 895 Policy Considerations for the I/I Control Program That Support the Standards and Procedures (Applies to Public and Private Systems) I/I CONTROL POLICY ISSUE: Side Sewer Ownership and Responsibility In Edmonds, side sewers are owned by the City from the sewer main to the property line, and by the property owner from the property line to the building connection. This can cause reduced effectiveness in a long-term I/I reduction program and could be modified by several options. POLICY 17 The City of Edmonds shall assume ownership and/or responsibility for each side sewer from the sewer main to the point(s) of connection at the building. EXPLANATION * With the City having overall ownership and/or responsibility for the entire side sewer assembly from building to main, more effective construction inspection/oversight, as well as ongoing operation and maintenance, will increase the likelihood that long-term I/I reduction can be realized. * Enabling legislation by the City Council and cost or other compensation for assuming ownership will be required. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS 0 If ownership is assumed, additional compensation to property owners would be required. $ Increased City staff time and expense (or consultant) for side sewer installation inspection/oversight. $ Increased City staff time and expense to set up and maintain a long-term O&M program. $ More effective operation of the sewage conveyance system. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS Increased access by City representatives on private property. + Potential for increased costs due to increased O&M by City. + Potential for reduced liability to property owner. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 429 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Modeling and En2ineerinj! Analysis GUIDELINE NO. G-1 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Following the completion of the Edmonds sewer system modeling performed previously, the modeling basins should be reevaluated on a regular basis with updated flow and system network information to provide an ongoing tool for monitoring the integrity of the sewer system as it both ages and expands. Hydraulic models can also be used to evaluate system response to potential high -flow sources such as high -water -use industries, adjoining jurisdictions, or large developments. GUIDELINE + Sewer system modeling should be conducted on a regular basis to assess system loading and capacity for ongoing and future sewer planning efforts. A dynamic software modeling program should be used that can be used to calibrate measured flow data with rainfall measured during the corresponding storm. Flow data shall be obtained by the City of Edmonds, including measurement of wet-weather/storm conditions and concurrent rainfall data. + Development of a reliable, well -calibrated model requires good as -built plans and maps, and long-term flow monitoring data. The City shall maintain an as -built record for new and modified POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Competency of staff in computer modeling and interpretation, or outsourcing to a consultant on a periodic basis. $ Proactive planning and logistics for maintaining an as -built database. 0 Purchase of license for a sewer software model, or cost to develop alternative model. $ Cost for training and operation of model by City staff. $ Expense for flow monitoring equipment and staff, whether purchased or leased/rented on a periodic basis. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ No impact. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 430 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Lateral and Side Sewer Rehabilitation Methods GUIDELINE NO. G-2 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Once the decision has been made to rehabilitate laterals or side sewers to control I/I, several alternatives may be used to replace or rehabilitate the pipe. These include trenchless rehabilitation techniques such as cure -in -place lining or pipe bursting, as well as conventional dig and replace. An evaluation should be made to determine suitability (technical and cost-effectiveness) of trenchless methods versus conventional dig and replacement of the sewer. The technical evaluation should assess specific issues such as the sewer location and length, alignment, condition of the pipe being replaced, assessment of the surface features that would be disturbed by construction, and the degree of root intrusion in the existing lines. The alternative pipe rehabilitation methods that should be considered include: Pipe bursting is a trenchless pipeline rehabilitation method that can be used to replace side sewer pipes. Illicit connections are eliminated by removing the connection to the side sewer. It is possible to increase the size of the pipe; however, site specific constraints may limit the ability to increase the size. Using pipe bursting to replace a pipe may be restricted depending upon adjacent utilities, proximity to surface improvements, the type of existing pipe being replaced, and soil conditions. There are a number of variations on pipe bursting, such as pneumatic, hydraulic expansion, and static pull systems. All of these displace the old pipe into the adjacent ground and pull a new pipe in to replace the old pipe. There are also related processes such as pipe reaming, which is a variation of horizontal directional drilling, where pieces of the old pipe are removed rather than pushing them into the adjacent soil. The most common pipe material used is HDPE, but other types of pipe material such as cast iron, MDPE, and ABS can be used for the replacement pipe. Pipe bursting of side sewers will require excavation of at least two pits for insertion and pulling. Generally, pipe bursting is suitable for straight sections. If there are buried bends on the side sewer it may require additional pits to be excavated for installation of the replacement pipe. Cure -in -place pipe (CIPP,) liner is a trenchless pipeline rehabilitation method that can be used to repair existing side sewer pipes. CIPP liner involves inverting an epoxy -resin -impregnated flexible tube into an existing line using hydrostatic head. The resin is then cured using heat to produce a pipe inside the existing side sewer. The outside diameter of the replacement pipe is smaller than the existing pipe to allow the system to be installed. Capacity in the pipeline will be reduced because of the reduction in pipe size. Fold and form lining is a trenchless pipeline rehabilitation method that can be used to repair existing side sewer pipes. The fold -and -form process involves inserting a heated PVC or HDPE thermoplastic liner, folded or deformed into a U-shape, into an existing side sewer and re -rounding the liner using heat and pressure to produce a pipe inside the existing pipe. The outside diameter of the replacement pipe is smaller than the existing pipe to allow the system to be installed. Capacity in the pipeline will be reduced because of the reduction in pipe size. GUIDELINE + Construction standards for pipe bursting, cure -in -place lining and folded and formed liners shall be as follows: + Pipe Bursting: • Pipe bursting shall meet the requirements of the City's Inflow and Infiltration Control Program Guide Specifications. + Cure -in -Place Lining: • Cure -in -place -lining shall meet the requirements of the City's Inflow and Infiltration Control Program Guide Specifications. + Fold and Form: • Fold and form -lining shall meet the requirements of the City's Inflow and Infiltration Control Program Guide Specifications. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 431 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program + Testing and Inspection: • The rehabilitated side sewer/lateral from the inspection wye/cleanout at the building foundation to the main side sewer/lateral pipeline shall be tested in accordance with the I/I Side Sewer/Lateral Leak Testing Standard 5-20, and shall be television inspected in accordance with the I/I CCTV Inspection Standard 5-25 after completion of the repairs and backfilling of the pipe trench. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS Added cost to perform inspection and testing. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS Added cost for inspection and testing of private sewer lines. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 432 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Pipe Protection -Depth of Cover GUIDELINE NO. G-3 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Shallow buried flexible pipe is susceptible to damage from heavy live loads and construction loads. Deeply buried flexible pipe is susceptible to damage from heavy soil loading. Pipe type, class, and the quality of the pipe bedding installation are especially important for flexible pipe buried less than 3 feet deep and greater than 15 feet deep beneath a general fill. Standard industry practice based on load testing, engineering analysis and field experience is to maintain a minimum cover over flexible pipe of 3 feet to avoid damage from heavy live loads and construction loads. Burial depths greater than 15 feet create soil loading conditions that exceed the capacity of flexible pipe unless extremely careful attention is paid to pipe bedding installation. GUIDELINE + Depth of cover over flexible pipe should be 3 feet minimum and 15 feet maximum. Where the depth of cover over a pipe is less than 3 feet or exceeds 15 feet, follow pipe manufacturer's recommendations for pipe material type and class, pipe installation procedures, bedding and backfill. + Testing and inspection: Full time inspection of pipe bedding operation should be performed on flexible pipe installations over 15 feet. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Inspection of bedding operations to ensure proper installation is especially critical for deeply buried flexible pipe. $ Inspection costs would go up if the City is currently not continuously inspecting bedding placement for deeply buried flexible pipe. $ Review of supporting calculations would be required when flexible pipe is used for installations over 15 feet. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Construction costs for deeply buried pipe may increase moderately, thus increasing costs to ratepayers. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 433 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Manhole Rehabilitation GUIDELINE NO. G-4 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Manhole rehabilitation can be used to eliminate sources of both infiltration and inflow directly into the structure where the rehabilitation is determined to be more cost effective than replacement of the manhole. There are a variety of rehabilitation techniques, including manhole grouting, cementitious spray -on lining, epoxy linings, manhole inserts, and cure -in -place liners. Many of the methods provide benefits other than just I/I reduction such as protection from internal corrosion due to hydrogen sulfide. Manhole rehabilitation for I/I reduction may also include replacement of manhole rings or replacement of the ring and cover. GUIDELINE When a manhole is rehabilitated for I/I reduction, consideration should be given to factors that contributed to the current condition and whether the selected rehabilitation technique will prevent the potential recurrence of I/I. Rehabilitation techniques include spray on coatings, cure -in -place linings, chemical grouting, or a rigid liner installed within the existing manhole. Coatings, linings and chemical grouting for manhole rehabilitation shall meet the requirements of the City's I/I Control Program Guide Specifications. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS + Inspection requirements to confirm that the manhole preparation and rehabilitation is done correctly. + Potential surface disruptions resulting from construction of the rehabilitation. + Costs to test the completed manhole rehabilitation. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS + Potential inconveniences resulting from rehabilitation construction activities. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 434 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Spot Repairs GUIDELINE NO. G-5 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Pipeline spot repairs are repairs to specific deficiencies in a pipeline, such as a specific leaking pipe joint. These repairs can be a cost-effective way to eliminate I/I in sections of a pipeline that are sound except for a few point locations. Only those specific deficiencies in the pipeline are repaired. In general, in pipeline sections that require three or more spot repairs, it is often more cost-effective to consider the entire manhole -to -manhole run of pipe for rehabilitation or replacement. GUIDELINE + Spot repairs can be accomplished by several different methods from trenchless systems like short CIPP liners, to injecting epoxy resins or chemical grout into leaking pipe joints, to dig and repair with structural grouting sleeves or short sections of pipe replacement. The repair method shall address whether the defect is structural or limited to an intact leaky joint. Spot repairs may be needed to properly prepare the line for some of the manhole -to -manhole rehabilitation/replacement options. + For a dig and replace spot repair, the section of the sewer main shall be removed to the nearest joint and replaced with new pipe. The new section of pipe shall be installed with repair couplings meeting the City of Edmonds's approval but in any case shall provide a water tight repair. + Trenchless spot repairs shall meet the 1/1 standard for the particular rehabilitation method used. + If SSES reveals there are 3 or more defects that require repair on a manhole to manhole run of sewer main, it is recommended that the entire run of sewer be evaluated for rehabilitation or replacement. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS * The costs associated with testing and inspecting the spot repair. * Surface disruptions from construction activities may inconvenience the public. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 0 No impact. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 435 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Spot Repairs (Side Sewers) GUIDELINE NO. G-6 I/I CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Private side sewer spot repairs are repairs to specific deficiencies in a side sewer pipe, such as a specific leaking pipe joint. These repairs can be a cost effective way to eliminate I/I in sections (generally cleanout-to-cleanout that show damage) of a side sewer that are sound except for a few point locations. Only those specific deficiencies in the side sewer are repaired. In sections with numerous spot problems or with other mitigating factors such as age, the entire side sewer is a candidate for complete rehabilitation or replacement. GUIDELINE As a precursor to doing spot repairs, the City of Edmonds shall assess the age and material of the side sewer to determine if it should be completely replaced rather than allow spot repairs. If a side sewer is over 50 years old, it should be completely rehabilitated or replaced from the building to the public right-of-way. + Spot repairs can be accomplished by several different methods from trenchless systems like CIPP liners, injecting epoxy resins, or chemical grout, to dig and repair with structural grouting sleeves or short sections of pipe replacement. The repair method shall address whether the defect is structural or limited to an intact leaky joint. + For a dig and replace spot repair, the section of the side sewer shall be removed to the nearest joint and replaced with new pipe meeting the requirements of the I/I Pipe Materials Guideline G- 6. The new section of pipe shall be installed with approved repair couplings. + Trenchless spot repairs shall meet the 1/1 standard for the particular rehabilitation method used. + Inspection wye/cleanouts shall be installed on the side sewer per Standard Detail SS- 1as part of the snot repair. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS $ Cost of installing the inspection wye/cleanout if none exists. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS 4 Added cost will be incurred if no inspection wye/cleanout exists in the system. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 436 of 895 Control Standards / Guidelines for the I/I Control Program TITLE: Manhole Lids/Inserts GUIDELINE NO. G-7 UI CONTROL MEASURE ISSUE: Older style manhole covers may contain numerous pick holes that allow inflow into the collection system during storm events. Old and new manhole covers are both susceptible to inflow through or around the cover if water ponds over the cover. Eliminating this source of inflow will reduce excess flow from entering the system. Replacing the cover with a new cover will reduce or eliminate this source of inflow. GUIDELINE • Manhole covers that have been identified through an SSES as being susceptible to inflow may be replaced with a gasketed solid cover or just the ring or cover may be replaced if it is determined to be the source of the problem. • In lieu of replacing the cover a manhole insert may be installed under the existing cover to eliminate or reduce the volume of inflow that enters the sewer. Manhole inserts are metal or plastic pans installed just under the manhole cover and are supported by the manhole ring. All materials used in the manufacture of manhole inserts shall be plastic or stainless steel in accordance with Standard Detail MH-3. POTENTIAL EDMONDS IMPACTS • Installation will be disruptive to traffic if the manhole is located in a street. • Minor additional cost for using solid, gasketed covers. POTENTIAL PRIVATE PROPERTY/RATEPAYER IMPACTS $ Possibly traffic inconveniences during the ring and cover replacement. 5/12/2010 Packet Page 437 of 895 APPENDIX B Model Calibration and Documentation • Meter A Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Meter 3 Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Meter C Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Meter E Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Meter Richmond Beach Flows —Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Meter D Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Meter B Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Meter 2 Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Meter 1 Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Edmonds Meter at WWTP Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • MLT Meter at WWTP Flows — Average Dry Weather, Average Daily, Average Wet Weather, Maximum Month Daily • Table B.1 Summary of Model Results Packet Page 438 of 895 3 Meter 3 - Maximum Month Daily Flow Maximum Month Flow Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) -Precipitation (inches) 12 3 0 OHO OHO p� O� O� O� p4' O6 Ob O`b O°' Oo OC Oo yO yO yO yO -Y -YNY titi titi -Y -YIV yL yL �. ac ,. �. a� ,�. a� y Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 N 5.0 a 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Packet Page 439 of 895 Meter C - Maximum Month Daily Flow O Maximum Month Flow —Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) —Precipitation (inches) 1 v E 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 o`° Z5 oA o� oA oP Qi o`� o`� o�' 5Z) o°' o°' o°' do do do do titi titi titi titi titi titi titi titi ti O�� ti��c yPQc ti O�� y>�� yP�c 0yP�c y J� O�c yPQc y J� Oo� yPQc y�J� Oo� yPQc y 0�� Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 -- v s 3.5 = c 4.0 c Y 4.5 ,Q u N 5.0 a 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Packet Page 440 of 895 Meter E - Maximum Month Daily Flow O Maximum Month Flow Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) -Precipitation (inches) 3 2.5 7 0.5 0 OCb Oq' Oq' O� O0) OC) 00 yO yO yO yO NY NY NY NY NY NY titi ti� ti 0�� y a� y a� c� Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 a, L 4.5 c c 5.0 c �a 5.5 a 6.0 a 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 Packet Page 441 of 895 Richmond Beach Meter at WWTP - Maximum Month Daily Flow -Maximum Month Flow Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) -Precipitation (inches) 10 8 -o to E 6 3 0 LL a m 3 a 4 m 2 0 O10 O10 01 01 01 01 Q%, 04' Q%, Q%I o°' O� o°' e y0 ,yo ,yo ,y0 yy by by titi titi titi titi titi J� O�w ry Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 aa) L 4.5 c c 5.0 c m 5.5 a 'v 6.0 a 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 Packet Page 442 of 895 Meter D - Maximum Month Daily Flow Maximum Month Flow Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) Precipitation (inches) 5 4 Ln m 2 1 0 O<° Oro Q) O� O� Q) Q) 04' 04' O'b O�i 00 00 00 yO yO yO yO yy -yY N y Nyy y1 y1 y1 y1 ti JN O`x. � ��. ti �c ti JN O`x, � ��. ti �� y,JN O`x, � ��. ti �t y,JN Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 a, s 4.5 c c 5.0 c r m 5.5 a 'u 6.0 a 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 Packet Page 443 of 895 Meter B - Maximum Month Daily Flow pMaximum Month Flow Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) —Precipitation (inches) 0 1.5 0.5 0 o`O o`O p^ o^ o� o� og' o`b yo �O ti0 ti0 y� "�Y titi titi y ti Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 N v s 3.5 c 4.0 c 16 M 4.5 S V G1 5.0 0- 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Packet Page 444 of 895 Meter 2 - Maximum Month Daily Flow Maximum Month Flow Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) -Precipitation (inches) 2.5 2 -a E 1.5 3 0 0.5 0 OHO OHO p� O� O� O� p4' O6 Ob O`b O°' Oo OC Oo yO yO yO yO -Y -YNY titi titi -Y -YIV yL yL �. ac ,. �. a� ,�. a� y Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 N 5.0 a 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Packet Page 445 of 895 Meter 1- Maximum Month Daily Flow OMaximum Month Flow Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) -Precipitation (inches) 1 0.8 E 0.6 in 0.4 0.2 0 0`O 0`O p1 0^ 01 01 04' 04' C%' O`b 091 00 00 00 NO NQ, ,yo ,yO yy yy yy yy yL yL yL "^YV 0��. �; ac ,?�� ry ac �?Qt 'y,� Iy ac �?Qc 'y,�� 0��, fy a� , Pic ti 0��, ly a� ti ti J� 0��. Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 N v L 3.5 4.0 c R 4.5 Q- U v 5.0 a 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Packet Page 446 of 895 Edmonds Meter at WWTP - Maximum Month Flow, November - March OMaximum Month Daily Flow Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) -Precipitation (inches) 10 0 m 4 2 0 NY ly ly,�� Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 e� v r 3.5 C 4.0 .4 Y 4.5 .°- v G1 5.0 a 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 Packet Page 447 of 895 Meter MLT at WWTP - Maximum Month Daily Flow ♦Maximum Month Daily Flow Maximum Month Flow (2010 - 2012) -Precipitation (inches) 12 10 8 3 4 N 0 OHO OHO p� O� O� O� p4' O6 Ob O`b O°' Oo OC Oo yO yO yO yO -Y -YNY titi titi -Y -YIV yL yL �. ac ,. �. a� ,�. a� y Date 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 a, s 4.5 9 c 5.0 c m 5.5 a 'u 6.0 a 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 Packet Page 448 of 895 Appendix B Table 131: Capacity limited pipes with proposed diameter and proposed upsize year Pipe Name Existing Diameter (in) Proposed Diameter Upsize Year in 7-32D-ED-WWTP 36 42 2013 11-20-11-19 24 42 2013 11-18-7-33 24 42 2013 16-127-16-128 24 42 2013 11-19-11-18 24 42 2013 17-87-17-88 24 36 2013 17-48-17-59 24 36 2013 17-88-17-89 24 36 2013 17-47-17-48 24 36 2013 17-59-17-60 24 36 2013 17-61-17-84 24 36 2013 17-60-17-61 24 36 2013 17-85-17-86 24 36 2013 17-84-17-85 24 36 2013 17-86-17-87 24 36 2013 16-132-16-133 24 36 2013 16-128-16-129 24 36 2013 12-268-12-278 24 36 2013 16-135-16-136 24 36 2013 16-136-16-137 24 36 2013 16-129-16-130 24 36 2013 16-131-16-132 24 36 2013 15-7-15-5A 24 36 2013 15-13-15-13A 24 36 2013 12-267-12-268 24 36 2013 15-11-15-10 24 36 2013 15-8-15-7 24 36 2013 16-135A-16-135 24 36 2013 12-265-12-267 24 36 2013 16-133-16-134 24 36 2013 15-3-15-2A 24 36 2013 15-11A-15-11 24 36 2013 11-25-11-24 24 36 2013 15-5A-15-4A 24 36 2013 15-4A-15-4 24 36 2013 15-10-15-9 24 36 2013 11-28A-11-27 24 36 2013 8-265-8-266 15 21 2013 8-280-8-281 15 21 2013 8-281-8-282 15 21 2013 8-278-8-279 15 21 2013 Packet Page 449 of 895 Pipe Name Existing Diameter (in) Proposed Diameter Upsize Year in 8-275-8-278 15 21 2013 8-266-8-275 15 21 2013 8-279-8-280 15 21 2013 7-84-7-85 15 18 2013 14-62-14-63 12 18 2013 14-64-17-14 12 18 2013 17-9-17-10 12 18 2013 17-11-17-17 12 18 2013 17-14-17-9 12 18 2013 17-10-17-11 12 18 2013 14-63-14-64 12 18 2013 7-40-7-48 12 18 2013 7-41-7-40 12 18 2013 14-53-14-55 12 18 2013 14-56-14-62 12 18 2013 7-48-7-47 12 18 2013 7-47-7-50 12 18 2013 12-105T-12-105U 8 18 2013 12-105D-12-105E 8 18 2013 12-105E-12-105F 8 18 2013 12-105F-12-105T 8 18 2013 12-105U-11-28B 8 18 2013 14-50-14-50C 12 15 2013 14-25-14-41 10 15 2013 8-35-8-36 10 15 2013 9-202-9-20 10 15 2013 9-2-9-1A 10 15 2013 9-193-9-196 10 15 2013 9-19-9-18 10 15 2013 9-201-9-202 10 15 2013 9-196-9-196A 10 15 2013 9-16-9-15 10 15 2013 9-17-9-16 10 15 2013 9-18-9-17 10 15 2013 9-200-9-201 10 15 2013 9-199-9-200 10 15 2013 9-198-9-199 10 15 2013 9-197-9-198 10 15 2013 9-196A-9-197 10 15 2013 9-20-9-19 10 15 2013 9-15-9-14 10 15 2013 8-33-8-34 10 15 2013 8-34-8-35 10 15 2013 14-48-14-50 10 15 2013 9-224-9-202 8 15 2013 Packet Page 450 of 895 Pipe Name Existing Diameter (in) Proposed Diameter Upsize Year in 14-26-14-25 8 15 2013 8-41-8-42 8 15 2013 4-94-4-93 10 12 2013 4-91-4-90 10 12 2013 4-161-4-95 10 12 2013 4-162-4-161 10 12 2013 4-163-4-162 10 12 2013 4-173-4-163 10 12 2013 9-189-9-190 10 12 2013 4-92-4-91 10 12 2013 14-48A-14-48 10 12 2013 4-93-4-92 10 12 2013 4-83-4-82 10 12 2013 4-89-4-86 10 12 2013 4-84-4-83 10 12 2013 4-81-4-80 10 12 2013 8-243-8-242 10 12 2013 8-50-8-52 10 12 2013 14-40-14-39 8 12 2013 14-34-14-33 8 12 2013 9-188-9-189 8 12 2013 14-30-14-27 8 12 2013 14-31-14-30 8 12 2013 8-4-8-5 8 12 2013 8-2A-8-3 8 12 2013 12-105I-12-105H 8 12 2013 8-2-8-2A 8 12 2013 12-73-12-75 8 12 2013 8-51-8-50 8 12 2013 16-125-16-127 30 42 2019 16-124-16-125 30 42 2019 16-123-16-124 30 42 2019 7-33-7-32 30 42 2019 11-21-11-20 24 42 2019 16-134-16-135A 24 36 2019 16-13OA-16-131 24 36 2019 16-130-16-130A 24 36 2019 16-137-15-13 24 36 2019 15-13A-15-12 24 36 2019 15-2-15-2B 24 36 2019 15-2B-12-265 24 36 2019 15-4-15-3 24 36 2019 12-295A-12-295B 24 36 2019 7-52-7-51 12 18 2019 17-82-17-83 10 18 2019 Packet Page 451 of 895 Pipe Name Existing Diameter (in) Proposed Diameter Upsize Year in 9-193A-9-193 10 15 2019 14-METER3-14-47 10 15 2019 9-14-9-13 10 15 2019 9-10-9-9 10 15 2019 9-9-13-63F 10 15 2019 9-11-9-10 10 15 2019 9-12-9-11 10 15 2019 9-13-9-12 10 15 2019 9-1A-8-33 10 15 2019 8-42-8-43 8 15 2019 4-80-4-78 10 12 2019 8-244-8-243 10 12 2019 17-78-17-82 8 12 2019 7-32C-7-32D 36 42 2033 7-32-7-32A 24 42 2033 16-METER2-16-12 30 36 2033 16-119-16-METER 30 36 2033 16-122-16-123 30 36 2033 16-121-16-122 30 36 2033 16-120-16-121 30 36 2033 16-117-16-118 30 36 2033 15-2A-15-2 24 36 2033 11-24A-11-23 24 36 2033 11-23-11-21 24 36 2033 11-27-11-26 24 36 2033 17-93-17-90 24 30 2033 8-249-8-265 15 21 2033 12-294A-12-295 8 18 2033 11-28B-11-28 8 18 2033 14-50C-14-50D 12 15 2033 14-52A-14-53 12 15 2033 14-50E-14-51 12 15 2033 14-50D-14-50E 12 15 2033 14-52-14-52A 12 15 2033 14-46-14-METER3 10 15 2033 14-47-14-48 10 15 2033 8-40-8-41 10 15 2033 8-39-8-40 10 15 2033 8-36-8-37 10 15 2033 8-37-8-39 10 15 2033 4-173A-4-173 10 12 2033 4-78-8-244 10 12 2033 4-82-4-81 10 12 2033 8-21A-8-51 10 12 2033 8-52-8-59 10 12 2033 Packet Page 452 of 895 Pipe Name Existing Diameter (in) Proposed Diameter Upsize Year in 16-83-17-69 8 12 2033 14-7A-14-7 8 12 2033 4-100-4-100A 8 12 2033 17-69-17-73 8 12 2033 8-3-8-4 8 12 2033 17-75-17-78 8 12 2033 14-27-14-26 8 12 2033 17-74-17-75 8 12 2033 12-75-8-14 8 12 2033 17-89-17-90 24 36 2019A 15-12-15-11A 24 36 2019A 9-190-9-193A 10 12 2019A 17-81-17-82 8 12 2019A 17-80-17-81 8 12 2019A 16-118-16-119 30 36 2033A 11-25A-11-25 30 36 2033A 11-26-11-25A 24 36 2033A 17-90-SHORELINE 24 36 2033A 17-92-17-93 24 30 2033A 17-46-17-47 24 36 Buildout 15-9-15-8 24 36 Buildout 12-277-12-298 24 36 Buildout 11-24-11-24A 24 36 Buildout 12-298-12-297 24 36 Buildout 12-278-12-277 24 36 Buildout 12-295-12-295A 24 36 Buildout 12-297-12-295 24 36 Buildout 12-295B-11-28 24 36 Buildout 11-24B-11-24A 8 24 Buildout 14-62B-14-63A 15 18 Buildout 14-63B-14-64A 15 18 Buildout 14-63A-14-63B 15 18 Buildout 14-64A-17-15 15 18 Buildout 8-57-7-41 12 18 Buildout 14-55-14-56 12 18 Buildout 7-50-7-52 12 18 Buildout 17-83-17-84 10 18 Buildout 14-41-14-42 10 15 Buildout 14-42-14-46 10 15 Buildout 13-63F-9-7 10 15 Buildout 4-174-4-173A 10 12 Buildout 4-85-4-84 10 12 Buildout 4-86-4-85 10 12 Buildout 4-90-4-89 10 12 Buildout 8-13-8-21 A 10 12 Buildout Packet Page 453 of 895 Pipe Name Existing Diameter (in) Proposed Diameter Upsize Year in 14-38-14-37 8 12 Buildout 13-3-14-48B 8 12 Buildout 14-35-14-34 8 12 Buildout 17-73-17-74 8 12 Buildout 8-56-7-41 24 18 BuildoutA 9-7-9-2 10 15 BuildoutA Note: Pipes denoted with `A' at the end of the proposed upsize year were upsized to prevent constriction when upstream and/or downstream pipes were upsized and are not necessarily capacity limited Packet Page 454 of 895 APPENDIX D SEPA Checklist and Determination of Significance Packet Page 455 of 895 of EDAI 0 U/ Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instritedons for Applicants: This enviromnental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of cheeklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: City of Edmonds Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2. Name of applicant: City ofEdmonds 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Michele F. De Lilla. Senior Utilities Engineer. 121 51h Ave N. Edmonds, WA 98020, 425-771-0220 4. Date checklist prepared: April 30, 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds Revised on 8119111 Packet Page 456 of 895 P71-_SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan.doc Page I of 18 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Edmonds Ch)� Council is likely to hold a public hearing on Sewer System Plan in Jame 2013. Projects in the Plan 1vill be implemented over the haenty year planning horizon. (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes Capital improvements are identified in the plan and scheduled to occur over the neat hvno! nears. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEPA checklist for adoption of the Comprehensive Sewer System Plan. Environmental review for projects identified in the plan will be conducted as necessary. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Edmonds City Council Adoption Approval fi•om the Washington State Department of Commerce (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The Comprehensive Sewer System Plan is a planning document used to evaluate the Cit� of Edmonds sewer system and plan fixture improvements for six and twenty yea• planning horizons The plan describes the water system in detail inchrding sources of water, treatment and distribution. An improvement program is established based on projected system needs. The lan also looks at sewer system standards, operations and maintenance. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the Revised on 8119111 P71-_SEPA_Checklistfor 2013 Sanitary Sewer Conap Plan.doc Page 2 of 18 Packet Page 457 of 895 agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The CioLof Edmonds retail sewer service area is within the city limits with the boundary defined by the city limits• excel for the southwest portion of the Cih) that is served by the Oh�mpic View Water &Sewer District. These Inuits are generally defined as the area that extends north to Meadowdale Beach Park, south to 244`r' Street SW along the Snohomish/King County boundary, and west to Pzrget Sound. The eastern boundary of the citti, limits Yeneralh, follows Ohnnpic View Drive, 761" Ave YVest and Hi lg u,Q), 99 except for a small portion of the city bounded on the ivest by Highway 99 and Lake Ballinger to the east betiveen 220'r' Street SW and 244"' Street SW (STAFF COMMENTS) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The City's sewer service area is located in a relatively hilly portion of southwest Snohomish Couunt} . The highest elevation in the Cith is in the southeast corner at over 450 feet. The topogt^aphy o the City's service genera slopes downward from east to west toward Puget Sound with the exception of the southeast corner of the service area which slopes toward Lake Ballinger. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Greater than 40%. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. County soil survey mapping developed by the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) indicate that the predominant soils found across the City are Alderwood gravelly sand loam, Everett gravelly sandy loam, and Alderwood urban Ian complex. Other soils with a much smaller extent include Kitsap silt loam, McKenna rg avelly silt loam and Mukilteo muck. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Yes, particularly in the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area in the Meadowdale Beach area of the City. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Revised on 8119111 P71-_SEPA_Checklistfor 2013 Sanitary Sewer Conip Plan.doc Page 3 of 18 Packet Page 458 of 895 Not applicable. (STAFF COMM f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minor erosion may occur during construction ofsystem nrainter7ance/improvenrentprojects identified in the plan. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Construction of temporary erosion and sediment control plans will be developed for construction activities and best mana erg Went practices used to minimize and control erosion. (STAFF COMMENTS) 2. AIR a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Revised on 8119111 P71 _-_SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Seiner Comp Plan.doc Page 4 of 18 Packet Page 459 of 895 The City of Edmonds sits along the western shores of Puget Sound and contains a number of relatively small streams including Willow Creek Shallabarger Creek, Shell Creek, Hirrdly Creek, Nor•thstrearn, Fridtdale Creek Perrinville Creek Meadowdale Creek, and a number of smaller unnamed creeks. Portions of Lake Ballinger are also located within the City of Edmonds' jurisdiction. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. There are limited areas within the city limits within the 100-year flood plain as identified on FEAM s Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Some areas identified include limited areas along Puget Sound, around Lake Ballinger, and the mouth of Shell Creek north ofCaspers Street. (STAFF COMMENTS) (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. The City discharges treated wastewater effluent into Puget Sound under the terms of an NPDES municipal discharge permit with the Department of Ecology. Discharge in accordance tivith permit limits lvould continue under this Comprehensive Sewer Plan Aver age annual dailXflows through the treatment plant are expected to increase from 5.82 rngd in 2012 to 5.8 mgd in 2033. Where necessat by-pass pumping will be implemented to maintain wastewater service in pipes to be upgraded. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71-_SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan. doe Page 5 of 18 Packet Page 460 of 895 b. Ground: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. (STAFF COMMENT (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storinwater runoff from disturbed areas will be routed through erosion and sedimentation control facilities to prevent erosion and impacts to surface water in accordance nvith applicable erosion control ordinances. Future project and site -specific SEPA review will identi y specific storinnvater runoff sources quantities and collection and disposal methods for each specific protect. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. It is unlikely that waste materials would enter ground or surface waters fi oin any of the project components. A slight possibility exists that a small spill or release of fuel or oil fiwin construction equipment could enter nearby surface waters. Future protect and site -specific SEPA review will ident any potential for waste inaterials entering ground or surface waters and appropriate mitigation for each specific project component. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71- SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Sewer Conrp Plan.doc Page 6 of 18 Packet Page 461 of 895 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other: X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other: X shrubs X grass (STAFF pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other: water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other: other types of vegetation: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plant species are known to be located within the City of Edmonds. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage site data do not show any rare, threatened, or endangered plant species in the City of Edmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 5. Animals a. Check or circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: X birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, ells, beaver, other: Revised on 8119111 P71- SEPA_Checktist for 2013 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plart.doc Page 7 of 18 Packet Page 462 of 895 fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: (STAFF COMMENTS) b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Puget Sound contains a number of threatened and endangered species including Southern Resident Killer JVhale, (Orcinus orca) Puget Sound DPS steelhead (Oncorlimchus mykiss) Puget Sound ESU Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshaw �ts� cha) Steller Sea Lion (Eumetopias iubatus) (STAFF COMMENTS) , C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Edmonds is located within the Pack Flyway. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity is needed to run the sewer treatment plant and the server pump stations. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71_- SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan.doc Page 8 of 18 Packet Page 463 of 895 C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe. None. Typical operation of a sewer systern does not increase exposure to environmental health hazards. (STAFF COMMENTS) (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None are anticipated. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No such measures are proposed. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Noise (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise would come from the site. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71- SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Seiner Comp Plan.doc Page 9 of 18 Packet Page 464 of 895 (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 8. Land and Shoreline Use What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Single-family residential uses are relatively evenly dispersed throughout the city and occupy the maiority of the cit?'s land use base. Approximately 3,100 acres or 55 pet -cent of the City's area is developed for single-family residential uses. Higher density residential development (including_ apartments and condorninizmzs) is primarily located south and north of the downtown; irz the vicinity of the Edmonds-Woodivay HiQlz School site and Swedish Hospital; and adjacent to 196rr' Street, 761r' Avenue and Highivay 99. Together, single family and multi- andly residential units comprise approximately 3,400 acres (nearly 60 percent of the total land in the city Commercial activity is concentrated in hvo principal areas — the Downtown/Waterfront and the Highivay 99 corridor (which includes retail and medical development in the vicinity of Swedish Hospital.) Smaller commercial nodes that primarily serve adjacent neighborhoods are located at the intersection of Edmonds Way (SR104) and 100°i Avenue/91h Avenue (Westgate) and 2121h Street/841h Avenue (S Corners.) The Port of Edmonds is located in the southern portion of the city's waterfront. The Port owns and manages 33 upland acres as well as a small boat harbor and marina, with space for 1,000 boats (approximately 11 acres The Port's property is occupied by approximately 80 businesses including _o fiice uses in Harbor Square. Approximately 258 acres of parks and open space lands are owned or operated by the Cihr, while there are another 229 acres of County -owned parks and open space land in the Edmonds area. Regional parks and beaches figure prominently in the City, including Brackett's Landing North and South, the Edmonds Fishing Piet-, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery, Edmonds Underwater Park, Marina Park Beach, Olympic Beach Park, local tidelands, and South Count? Senior Center. The Edmonds Marsh is a significant City -owned open space (23 acres), while Yost Memorial Park is the largest Park (120 acres) and Meadowdale Beach County Park (95 acres Overall, approximately 96 percent of the city is developed. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Describe any structures on the site. Typical urban development. Went. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. Revised on 8119111 P71_- SEPA_Checklistfor 2013 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan.doc Page 10 of 18 Packet Page 465 of 895 (STAFF COMMENTS) e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Varies depending on location within the Cit!ofEdmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Varies depending on location within the City of Edmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site? Varies depending on location within the City of Edmonds. Shoreline areas are along Puget Sound and Lake Ballinger. II r ',, n I _ (STAFF COMMENTS) U Lvu p v S ► V ,,- < L � S "3 1 S ✓� h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Critical areas are defined in ECDC 23.40 through ECDC 23.90. (STAFF COMMENTS) i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The City of Edinonds population is approximately 40 000 The population located within the City's conveyance {pipe) service area is approximately 34 000 The City's Wastewater Treatment Plant provides service also to portions of the Ronald Wastewater District most of the Cit� qf Mountlake Terrace, and all of Olympic View Water Sewer District for a total population of approximately 100 000. Projected population within the piped service area at the end o the twenty-year planning horizon is 40, 000 and for the WWTP is 120, 000. (STAFF COMMENTS) j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71_- SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan. doc Page 11 of 18 Packet Page 466 of 895 k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The plans and policies of the Cityof Edmonds and Snohomish County must he consistent with GMA pursuant to RCW 36.70A.100. The GMA also requires consistency with the implementation of Sewer System Plans and comprehensive plans pursuant to RCW 36.70A.120. (STAFF COMMENTS) 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle exterior building material(s) proposed? The existing wastewater treatment plant is approximately 20 feet tall. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71_-_SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan. doe Page 12 of 18 Packet Page 467 of 895 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. (STAFF CO C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? A number of recreational opportunities are available through the City of Edmonds including a number of Q Parks a dive park beaches along Puget Sound and numerous festivals held in the City throughout the near, (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71 _-_SEPA Checklist far 2013 Sanitary Setiver Conn Plan. doc Page 13 of 18 Packet Page 468 of 895 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. (STAFF CO 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There are a number ofplacesand/or structures on the state and local historical registers which include several residences, a cemetety, and a Carnegie LibratX (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. (STAFF CO 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Numerous streets throughout the City. Main arterials include State Route 104, State Route 564, and Highu,ay 99. Revised on 8119111 P71 _-_SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Seiver Coinp Plan. doe Page 14 of 18 Packet Page 469 of 895 (STAFF b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. Ferry, train, and bus. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. (STAFF COMMENTS) d. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. (STAFF COMMENTS) e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. The Sewer System Plan identifres a number of improvements to the system, including sewer main projects. The selection and implementation of these sewer• main projects will be accomplished annually by the City, utilizing a priority ranking system. This provides the city with flexibility to coordinate setiver main projects with street or other projects that rngy be planned for the same area. (STAFF COMMENTS) f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. None. (STAFF COMMENTS) g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) Revised on 8119111 P71-_SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitaiy Sewer Comp Plan.doc Page 15 of 18 Packet Page 470 of 895 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: None. (STAFF COMMENTS) 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: All utilities are available within the CityofEdmonds. (STAFF COMMENTS) b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The Sewer System Plan describes how the CityofEmonds will provide sewer services to its service area. (STAFF COMMENTS) C. SIGNATURE I declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature of Proponent Date Submitted 0 Revised on 8119111 P71_ SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Seiner Comp Plan.doc Page 16 of 18 Packet Page 471 of 895 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Replacement of pipes and other repairs to the server system in the frture will result in normal construction noise and construction vehicles and equipment would also temporarily increase emissions to the air. Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Construction projects must comply with the Cib} 's noise abatement and control regzdations in ECC 5.30. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The improvements recommended in the sewer system plan are not anticipated to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: None. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? rater use within the service area is expected to grow with projected increases in population. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Conservation measures will help reduce water use and treated water discharge. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Neither the water system plan nor improvements recommended in the plan area anticipated to affect environmentally sensitive or protected areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The sewer systent plan is consistent with land use plans adopted by the Cith of Edmonds and Snohomish Cotmth and will not allow or encourage incompatible uses. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The improvements recommended in the sewer system plan area prirtarih� infi-astructure improvements of the existing s sy tern, although they are also planned to meet the anticipated needs of growth. The sewer system plan is not expected to increase demand. Revised on 8119111 P71_ SEPA_Checklistfor 2013 Sanitary Seiner Contp Plan. doc Page 17 of 18 Packet Page 472 of 895 Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: The Sewer Division has developed a preventive maintenance program to ensure all critical components of the water system are properlyfirnctionin and re Ug lady maintained for lon -tg erin performance and reliability. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. It is not anticipated that improvements recommended in the plan will conflict with existing rrcggulations. All improvements will be coordinated with local, state, and federal agencies for appropriate permits. Revised on 8119111 P71- SEPA_Checklist for 2013 Sanitary Seiner Comp Plan.doc Page 18 of 18 Packet Page 473 of 895 WAC 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) i�7 Ir�.7iilh./_� Cs7l�a7� C7 E.'3[ k .:.I[N_l`�[y Description of proposal: Adoption of the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Sewer Plan. the comprehensive Sewer System Plan is a planning document used to evaluate the City of Edmonds sewer system and plan future improvements for six and twenty-year planning horizons. The plan describes the City's sewer system in detail. The plan also looks at swere system standards, operations and maintenance: An improvement program is established based on projected needs. Proponent: City of Edmonds Location of proposal, including street address if any: City wide. Lead agency: City of Edmonds The lead agency has determined that the requirements for enviro►rmenfa! analysis and. protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adojateaf. under chapter 36.70A > RCW, and in .other applicable local, state; or federal Jaws ,or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C 240 and. WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS. XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by June 7, 2014 Project Planner: Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Responsible Official: Rob Chave, Planning Manager Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, monds WA 9802 425-771-0220 Date: May 22, 2013 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than . _ June 7, 2012. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on May 24 2012, at the Edmonds Public Library and Edmonds Public Safety Building. Published in the Everett Herald. Emalled to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunitCcbecy.wa.gov). Mailed of property owners within 300 feet of the site. XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, Comprehensive Plan Sewer Plan, and DNS are available at www.EdmondsWa.gov through the Permits Online link. Search for file number AMD20130006. These materials are also available for viewing at the Planning Division — located on the second floor of City Hall: 121 51h Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020. Page 1 of 2 SEPA DETERMINATION,DOC 5122113.SEPA Packet Page 474 of 895 Mailed to the following along with the Environmental Checklist: XX Environmental Review Section XX Department of Ecology P.O. Box 47703 Olympia, WA 98504-7703 Email: SEPAunita(_ ecy.wa.gov XX XX COMCAST Outside rlant Engirieer, North Region 1525 75t St. SW Ste 200 Everett, WA 98203 XX XX Washington State Dept. of Transportation Attn: Ramin Pazooki SnoKing Developer Services, MS 221 15700 Dayton Ave. N. XX PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133-9710 XX Washington State Department of Health Division of Drinking Water P.O. Box 47822 Olympia, WA 98504-7822 XX Washington State Dept. of Commerce 906 Columbia Street SW P.O. Box 48300 Olympia, WA 98504-8300 XX Puget Sound Partnership P.O. Box 40900 Olympia, WA 98504-0900 XX Puget Sound Regional Council Attn.: S.R.C. 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98104-1035 XX Tulalip Tribal Council 6700 Totem Beach Road Marysville, WA 98270 XX Snohomish County Planning & Development Services 3000 Rockefeller Everett, WA 98201 XX XX XX XX XX XX City of Mountlake Terrace Principle Planner 6100 21 91hSt. SW, Suite 200 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 City of Shoreline Attn.: Permit Services Manager 17500 Midvale Avenue North Shoreline, WA 98133-4905 Town of Woodway Attn.: Clerk -Treasurer 23920 113th Place West Woodway, WA 98020 City of Mukilteo 11930 Cyrus Way Mukilteo, WA 98275 Olympic View Water & Sewer District 8128 2281hSt. SW Edmonds, WA 98026 Alderwood Water District 3626 156th Street Southwest Lynnwood, WA 98037 Port of Edmonds 336 Admiral Way Edmonds, WA 98020 Shoreline Water District 1519 NE 177th ST Shoreline, WA 98155 Snohomish County Health District Attn: Bruce Straughn 3020 Rocker Ave Everett, WA 98201-3900 Puget Sound Energy Attn: Elaine Babby PO Box 97034, MIS EST-11 W Bellevue, WA 98009-9734 XX Kristin Kelly XX Snohomish County Public Works Snohomish Co/Skagit Co Program Director 3000 Rockefeller MIS 607 1429 Avenue D, PMB 532 Everett, WA 98201 Snohomish, WA 98290 kristi n(aifuturewi se.org XX Metro King County Environmental Planning KSC-TR-0415 XX Department of Archaeology & Historic 201 S. Jackson St. Preservation Seattle, WA 98104-3856 XX City of Lynnwood Attn.: Senior Planner P.O. Box 5008 Lynnwood, WA 98046 Attachments pc: File No. SEPA Notebook P.O. Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504-8343 Page 2 of 2 SEPA DETERMNATION_DOC 5/22113 SEPA Packet Page 475 of 895 APPENDIX E Cost Estimates CIP Project No. A — Dayton and Maple at 5th CIP Project No. B—West Lake Ballinger CIP Project No. C —Along 7th Between Melody and Caspers CIP Project No. D — Easement Extension of Main St between 83rd and 85th CIP Project No. E — 6th Street between Walnut and Hemlock CIP Project No. F—Alley between 3rd and 4th south of Howell CIP Project No. G — 97th Street south of 216th CIP Project No. H — Bowdoin west of 84th CIP Project No. I — Easement between 6th and A Ave at Forsyth CIP Project No. J — Bell Street between 4th and 5th CIP Project No. K — SR 104 — two locations CIP Project No. L — 3rd at Aloha and easements at 2nd Street CIP Project No. M — 72nd north of 158th CIP Project No. N — 5th Street at Holly and Forsyth CIP Project No. O — 8th and Main and 8th and Holly CIP Project No. P — 80th and 214th - easement CIP Project No. Q— Park and 92nd CIP Project No. R — Edmonds and 9th CIP Project No. S-9th and 216th CIP Project No. T—Admiral and Dayton CIP Project No. U — Easement 202nd & 77th and 203rd & 80th CIP Project No. V — 72nd and 226th CIP Project No. W —100th and 225th CIP Project No. X —100th and 216th CIP Project No. Y — 80th and 204th - easement CIP Project No. Z-73rd and 228th CIP Project No. AA-9th and 225th CIP Project No.BB — 7th and Daley CIP Project No. CC — 202nd and 75th CIP Project No. DID — 180th and Kairez - easement CIP Project No. EE — 216th and SR 99 Packet Page 476 of 895 CIP Project No. FF-75th and 218th CIP Project No. GG —Walnut and 10th CIP Project No. HH — Pioneer and Shell Valley CIP Project No. II — Maple and 93rd CIP Project No. JJ — 75th and 162nd CIP Project No. KK — Edmonds and 12th CIP Project No. LL— Puget and Sound View - easement CIP Project No. MM — SR 99 and 224th CIP Project No. NN — Dayton and 3rd CIP Project No. 00-83rd and 204th CIP Project No. PP — Sound View and Water CIP Project No. QQ-83rd and 202nd - easement CIP Project No. RR — Maple and 101h CIP Project No. SS — Walnut and 96th CIP Project No. TT— Pine and SR 104 CIP Project No. UU — 75th and 165th CIP Project No. VV — 7th and Bell CIP Project No. WW — 8th and Driftwood - easement CIP Project No. XX — 3rd and Walnut Packet Page 477 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # A Dayton and Maple at 5th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 16,294 $ 16,294 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,815 $ 1,815 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,815 $ 1,815 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,815 $ 1,815 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1606 $ 4 $ 6,424 6 Pavement Removal SY 527 $ 20 $ 10,537 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF 949 $ 31 $ 29,419 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 363 $ 100 $ 36,300 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 22 $ 750 $ 16,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 822 $ 20 $ 16,441 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 192 $ 25 $ 4,799 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 96 $ 25 $ 2,399 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 157 $ 140 $ 21,914 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 150,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 50,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 4,655 $ 4,655 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 3,104 $ 3,104 Subtotal $ 179,230 30% Contingency $ 53,769 Subtotal $ 232,999 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 20,970 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 253,969 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 30,476 Construction Services $ 17,778 City Project Administration $ 5,079 Legal $ 2,540 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 55,873 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 309,842 Packet Page 478 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # B West Lake Ballinger Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 111,126 $ 111,126 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 13,985 $ 13,985 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 200 $ 4 $ 800 6 Pavement Removal SY 60 $ 20 $ 1,200 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF 266 $ 130 $ 34,580 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 36-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 2797 $ 250 $ 699,250 17 72-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA 10 $ 8,000 $ 80,000 18 72-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF 20 $ 400 $ 8,000 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 40 $ 750 $ 30,000 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 4508 $ 20 $ 90,155 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 90 $ 25 $ 2,250 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 45 $ 25 $ 1,125 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 50 $ 140 $ 7,000 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 31,750 $ 31,750 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 21,167 $ 21,167 Subtotal 30% Contingency Subtotal 9.0% State Sales Tax Estimated Total Construction Costs PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits Construction Services City Project Administration Legal Subtotal Project Allied Costs 1,222,389 366,717 1,589,106 143,020 1,732,125 207,855 121,249 34,643 17,321 381,068 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 2,113,193 Packet Page 479 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # C Along 7th Between Melody and Caspers Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 38,706 $ 38,706 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 5,250 $ 5,250 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 400 $ 4 $ 1,600 6 Pavement Removal SY 111 $ 20 $ 2,222 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF 1357 $ 130 $ 176,410 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 15" to 21" Dia LF 438 $ 180 $ 78,840 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA 9 $ 4,000 $ 36,000 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF 20 $ 300 $ 6,000 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 21 $ 750 $ 15,750 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 296 $ 20 $ 5,922 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 33 $ 25 $ 820 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 16 $ 25 $ 410 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 14 $ 140 $ 1,904 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 11,059 $ 11,059 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 7,373 $ 7,373 Subtotal $ 425,765 30% Contingency $ 127,730 Subtotal $ 553,495 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 49,815 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 603,309 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 72,397 Construction Services $ 42,232 City Project Administration $ 12,066 Legal $ 6,033 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 132,728 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 736,038 Packet Page 480 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # D Easement Extension of Main St btwn 83rd/85th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 28,771 $ 28,771 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 7,440 $ 7,440 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 7,440 $ 7,440 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 7,440 $ 7,440 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 80 $ 4 $ 320 6 Pavement Removal SY 89 $ 20 $ 1,778 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 7,440 $ 7,440 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 15-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 1488 $ 110 $ 163,680 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA 5 $ 4,000 $ 20,000 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 16 $ 750 $ 12,000 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 2324 $ 20 $ 46,474 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 0 $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 8,220 $ 8,220 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 5,480 $ 5,480 Subtotal $ 316,483 30% Contingency $ 94,945 Subtotal $ 411,428 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 37,029 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 448,457 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 53,815 Construction Services $ 31,392 City Project Administration $ 8,969 Legal $ 4,485 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 98,660 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 547,117 Packet Page 481 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # E 6th Street between Walnut and Hemlock Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 18,704 $ 18,704 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1398 $ 4 $ 5,592 6 Pavement Removal SY 686 $ 20 $ 13,718 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 596 $ 100 $ 59,600 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 20 $ 750 $ 15,000 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 1122 $ 20 $ 22,447 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 262 $ 25 $ 6,557 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 131 $ 25 $ 3,279 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 246 $ 140 $ 34,446 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 5,344 $ 5,344 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 3,563 $ 3,563 Subtotal $ 205,749 30% Contingency $ 61,725 Subtotal $ 267,474 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 24,073 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 291,547 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 34,986 Construction Services $ 20,408 City Project Administration $ 5,831 Legal $ 2,915 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 64,140 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 355,687 Packet Page 482 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # F Alley between 3rd and 4th south of Howell Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,350 $ 2,350 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 240 $ 4 $ 960 6 Pavement Removal SY 67 $ 20 $ 1,333 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 207 $ 27 $ 5,589 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 6 $ 750 $ 4,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 85 $ 20 $ 1,692 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 20 $ 25 $ 492 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 10 $ 25 $ 246 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 4 $ 140 $ 571 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 672 $ 672 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 448 $ 448 Subtotal $ 25,853 30% Contingency $ 7,756 Subtotal $ 33,609 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 3,025 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 36,633 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 4,396 Construction Services $ 2,564 City Project Administration $ 733 Legal $ 366 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 8,059 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 44,693 Packet Page 483 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # G 97th Street south of 216th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 5,493 $ 5,493 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 3,750 $ 3,750 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 3,750 $ 3,750 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 3,750 $ 3,750 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 600 $ 4 $ 2,400 6 Pavement Removal SY 167 $ 20 $ 3,333 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 3,750 $ 3,750 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 475 $ 27 $ 12,825 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 15 $ 750 $ 11,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 212 $ 20 $ 4,230 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 49 $ 25 $ 1,230 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 25 $ 25 $ 615 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 10 $ 140 $ 1,428 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,569 $ 1,569 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,046 $ 1,046 Subtotal $ 60,420 30% Contingency $ 18,126 Subtotal $ 78,545 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 7,069 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 85,615 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 10,274 Construction Services $ 5,993 City Project Administration $ 1,712 Legal $ 856 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 18,835 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 104,450 Packet Page 484 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # H Bowdoin west of 84th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,303 $ 2,303 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,250 $ 1,250 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,250 $ 1,250 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,250 $ 1,250 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 200 $ 4 $ 800 6 Pavement Removal SY 56 $ 20 $ 1,111 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,250 $ 1,250 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 325 $ 27 $ 8,775 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 5 $ 750 $ 3,750 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 71 $ 20 $ 1,410 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 16 $ 25 $ 410 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 8 $ 25 $ 205 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 3 $ 140 $ 476 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 658 $ 658 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 439 $ 439 Subtotal $ 25,337 30% Contingency $ 7,601 Subtotal $ 32,939 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 2,964 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 35,903 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 4,308 Construction Services $ 2,513 City Project Administration $ 718 Legal $ 359 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 7,899 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 43,802 Packet Page 485 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # I Easement Between 6th and A Ave at Forsyi Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 1,535 $ 1,535 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 500 $ 500 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 500 $ 500 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 500 $ 500 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 40 $ 4 $ 160 6 Pavement Removal SY 22 $ 20 $ 444 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 500 $ 500 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 319 $ 27 $ 8,613 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 2 $ 750 $ 1,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 28 $ 20 $ 564 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 7 $ 25 $ 165 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 3 $ 25 $ 83 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 8 $ 140 $ 1,092 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 439 $ 439 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 292 $ 292 Subtotal $ 16,887 30% Contingency $ 5,066 Subtotal $ 21,953 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 1,976 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 23,928 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 2,871 Construction Services $ 1,675 City Project Administration $ 479 Legal $ 239 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 5,264 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 29,193 Packet Page 486 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # J Bell Street Between 4th and 5th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 1,237 $ 1,237 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 120 $ 4 $ 480 6 Pavement Removal SY 33 $ 20 $ 667 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 144 $ 27 $ 3,888 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 3 $ 750 $ 2,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 42 $ 20 $ 846 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 10 $ 25 $ 246 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 5 $ 25 $ 123 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 2 $ 140 $ 286 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 354 $ 354 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 236 $ 236 Subtotal $ 13,612 30% Contingency $ 4,084 Subtotal $ 17,695 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 1,593 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 19,288 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 2,315 Construction Services $ 1,350 City Project Administration $ 386 Legal $ 193 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 4,243 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 23,531 Packet Page 487 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # K SR 104 - Two locations Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 32,631 $ 32,631 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 3,155 $ 3,155 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 3,155 $ 3,155 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1502 $ 4 $ 6,008 6 Pavement Removal SY 558 $ 20 $ 11,152 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 36-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 631 $ 250 $ 157,750 17 72-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA 4 $ 8,000 $ 32,000 18 72-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF 10 $ 400 $ 4,000 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 6 $ 750 $ 4,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 974 $ 20 $ 19,486 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 228 $ 25 $ 5,698 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 114 $ 25 $ 2,849 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 250 $ 140 $ 35,024 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 9,323 $ 9,323 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 6,216 $ 6,216 Subtotal $ 358,946 30% Contingency $ 107,684 Subtotal $ 466,630 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 41,997 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 508,627 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 61,035 Construction Services $ 35,604 City Project Administration $ 10,173 Legal $ 5,086 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 111,898 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 620,525 Packet Page 488 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # L 3rd at Aloha and easements at 2nd Street Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 26,653 $ 26,653 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 3,500 $ 3,500 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1062 $ 4 $ 4,248 6 Pavement Removal SY 378 $ 20 $ 7,550 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 15" to 21" Dia LF $ 180 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 319 $ 27 $ 8,613 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 21-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 652 $ 170 $ 110,840 17 72-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA 5 $ 8,000 $ 40,000 18 72-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF 10 $ 400 $ 4,000 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 19 $ 750 $ 14,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 1187 $ 20 $ 23,744 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 149 $ 25 $ 3,717 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 74 $ 25 $ 1,858 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 150 $ 140 $ 21,018 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 7,615 $ 7,615 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 5,077 $ 5,077 Subtotal $ 293,184 30% Contingency $ 87,955 Subtotal $ 381,139 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 34,303 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 415,442 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 49,853 Construction Services $ 29,081 City Project Administration $ 8,309 Legal $ 4,154 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 91,397 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 506,839 Packet Page 489 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # M 72nd north of 158th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 7,850 $ 7,850 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,485 $ 1,485 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,485 $ 1,485 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,485 $ 1,485 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 834 $ 4 $ 3,336 6 Pavement Removal SY 298 $ 20 $ 5,955 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,485 $ 1,485 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 297 $ 80 $ 23,760 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 6 $ 750 $ 4,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 503 $ 20 $ 10,067 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 118 $ 25 $ 2,942 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 59 $ 25 $ 1,471 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 120 $ 140 $ 16,787 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 2,243 $ 2,243 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,495 $ 1,495 Subtotal $ 86,346 30% Contingency $ 25,904 Subtotal $ 112,250 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 10,103 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 122,353 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 14,682 Construction Services $ 8,565 City Project Administration $ 2,447 Legal $ 1,224 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 26,918 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 149,270 Packet Page 490 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # N 5th Street at Holly and Forsyth Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 4,857 $ 4,857 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 950 $ 950 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 950 $ 950 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 950 $ 950 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 498 $ 4 $ 1,992 6 Pavement Removal SY 180 $ 20 $ 3,607 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 950 $ 950 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 189 $ 80 $ 15,120 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 3 $ 750 $ 2,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 309 $ 20 $ 6,176 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 72 $ 25 $ 1,805 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 36 $ 25 $ 903 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 76 $ 140 $ 10,605 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,388 $ 1,388 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 925 $ 925 Subtotal $ 53,428 30% Contingency $ 16,028 Subtotal $ 69,457 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 6,251 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 75,708 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 9,085 Construction Services $ 5,300 City Project Administration $ 1,514 Legal $ 757 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 16,656 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 92,363 Packet Page 491 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # O 8th and Main & 8th and Holly Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 10,867 $ 10,867 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 2,030 $ 2,030 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 2,030 $ 2,030 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 2,030 $ 2,030 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1172 $ 4 $ 4,688 6 Pavement Removal SY 416 $ 20 $ 8,317 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 2,030 $ 2,030 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 406 $ 80 $ 32,480 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 9 $ 750 $ 6,750 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 699 $ 20 $ 13,987 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 164 $ 25 $ 4,088 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 82 $ 25 $ 2,044 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 164 $ 140 $ 23,024 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 3,105 $ 3,105 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 2,070 $ 2,070 Subtotal $ 119,540 30% Contingency $ 35,862 Subtotal $ 155,402 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 13,986 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 169,388 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 20,327 Construction Services $ 11,857 City Project Administration $ 3,388 Legal $ 1,694 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 37,265 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 206,654 Packet Page 492 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # P 80th and 214th - easement Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 6,424 $ 6,424 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,100 $ 1,100 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,100 $ 1,100 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,100 $ 1,100 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 760 $ 4 $ 3,040 6 Pavement Removal SY 260 $ 20 $ 5,201 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,100 $ 1,100 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 220 $ 80 $ 17,600 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 8 $ 750 $ 6,000 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 423 $ 20 $ 8,460 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 99 $ 25 $ 2,471 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 49 $ 25 $ 1,236 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 91 $ 140 $ 12,774 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,835 $ 1,835 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,224 $ 1,224 Subtotal $ 70,664 30% Contingency $ 21,199 Subtotal $ 91,863 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 8,268 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 100,131 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 12,016 Construction Services $ 7,009 City Project Administration $ 2,003 Legal $ 1,001 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 22,029 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 122,160 Packet Page 493 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # Q Park and 92nd Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 1,993 $ 1,993 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS $ 545 $ - 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF $ 4 $ - 6 Pavement Removal SY $ 20 $ - 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 247 $ 27 $ 6,669 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 3 $ 750 $ 2,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 391 $ 20 $ 7,811 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 0 $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 569 $ 569 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 380 $ 380 Subtotal $ 21,922 30% Contingency $ 6,577 Subtotal $ 28,499 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 2,565 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 31,064 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 3,728 Construction Services $ 2,174 City Project Administration $ 621 Legal $ 311 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 6,834 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 37,898 Packet Page 494 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # R Edmonds and 9th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,550 $ 2,550 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 280 $ 4 $ 1,120 6 Pavement Removal SY 78 $ 20 $ 1,555 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 217 $ 27 $ 5,859 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 7 $ 750 $ 5,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 99 $ 20 $ 1,974 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 23 $ 25 $ 574 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 11 $ 25 $ 287 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 5 $ 140 $ 666 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 729 $ 729 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 486 $ 486 Subtotal $ 28,050 30% Contingency $ 8,415 Subtotal $ 36,465 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 3,282 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 39,747 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 4,770 Construction Services $ 2,782 City Project Administration $ 795 Legal $ 397 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 8,744 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 48,491 Packet Page 495 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # S 9th and 216th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 3,363 $ 3,363 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 550 $ 550 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 550 $ 550 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 550 $ 550 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 418 $ 4 $ 1,672 6 Pavement Removal SY 140 $ 20 $ 2,807 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 550 $ 550 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 109 $ 80 $ 8,720 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 5 $ 750 $ 3,750 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 224 $ 20 $ 4,484 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 52 $ 25 $ 1,309 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 26 $ 25 $ 655 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 46 $ 140 $ 6,427 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 961 $ 961 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 640 $ 640 Subtotal $ 36,988 30% Contingency $ 11,096 Subtotal $ 48,084 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 4,328 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 52,412 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 6,289 Construction Services $ 3,669 City Project Administration $ 1,048 Legal $ 524 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 11,531 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 63,942 Packet Page 496 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # T Admiral and Dayton Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 6,063 $ 6,063 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 642 $ 4 $ 2,568 6 Pavement Removal SY 223 $ 20 $ 4,461 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 201 $ 80 $ 16,080 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 6 $ 750 $ 4,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 368 $ 20 $ 7,360 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 86 $ 25 $ 2,150 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 43 $ 25 $ 1,075 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 82 $ 140 $ 11,546 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,732 $ 1,732 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,155 $ 1,155 Subtotal $ 66,690 30% Contingency $ 20,007 Subtotal $ 86,697 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 7,803 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 94,500 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 11,340 Construction Services $ 6,615 City Project Administration $ 1,890 Legal $ 945 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 20,790 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 115,28E Packet Page 497 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # U Easement 202nd & 77th and 203rd & 80th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 8,346 $ 8,346 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1118 $ 4 $ 4,472 6 Pavement Removal SY 404 $ 20 $ 8,075 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 419 $ 27 $ 11,313 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 7 $ 750 $ 5,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 689 $ 20 $ 13,790 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 161 $ 25 $ 4,031 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 81 $ 25 $ 2,015 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 168 $ 140 $ 23,544 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 2,385 $ 2,385 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,590 $ 1,590 Subtotal $ 91,811 30% Contingency $ 27,543 Subtotal $ 119,354 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 10,742 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 130,096 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 15,611 Construction Services $ 9,107 City Project Administration $ 2,602 Legal $ 1,301 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 28,621 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 158,717 Packet Page 498 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # V 72nd and 226th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 8,990 $ 8,990 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1206 $ 4 $ 4,824 6 Pavement Removal SY 434 $ 20 $ 8,671 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 18" Dia LF $ 180 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 443 $ 27 $ 11,961 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 8 $ 750 $ 6,000 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 737 $ 20 $ 14,749 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 172 $ 25 $ 4,311 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 86 $ 25 $ 2,155 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 178 $ 140 $ 24,949 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 2,569 $ 2,569 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,712 $ 1,712 Subtotal $ 98,891 30% Contingency $ 29,667 Subtotal $ 128,558 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 11,570 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 140,128 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 16,815 Construction Services $ 9,809 City Project Administration $ 2,803 Legal $ 1,401 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 30,828 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 170,957 Packet Page 499 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # W 100th and 225th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 6,094 $ 6,094 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,250 $ 1,250 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,250 $ 1,250 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,250 $ 1,250 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 808 $ 4 $ 3,232 6 Pavement Removal SY 292 $ 20 $ 5,841 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,250 $ 1,250 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 304 $ 27 $ 8,208 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 5 $ 750 $ 3,750 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 499 $ 20 $ 9,983 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 132 $ 25 $ 3,298 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 66 $ 25 $ 1,649 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 122 $ 140 $ 17,074 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,741 $ 1,741 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,161 $ 1,161 Subtotal $ 67,031 30% Contingency $ 20,109 Subtotal $ 87,140 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 7,843 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 94,983 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 11,398 Construction Services $ 6,649 City Project Administration $ 1,900 Legal $ 950 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 20,896 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 115,87E Packet Page 500 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # X 100th and 216th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 6,688 $ 6,688 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 2,700 $ 2,700 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 2,700 $ 2,700 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 2,700 $ 2,700 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 378 $ 4 $ 1,512 6 Pavement Removal SY 134 $ 20 $ 2,674 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 2,700 $ 2,700 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 288 $ 27 $ 7,776 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 197 $ 80 $ 15,760 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 10 $ 750 $ 7,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 419 $ 20 $ 8,375 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 52 $ 25 $ 1,310 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 26 $ 25 $ 655 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 52 $ 140 $ 7,329 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,911 $ 1,911 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,274 $ 1,274 Subtotal $ 73,564 30% Contingency $ 22,069 Subtotal $ 95,633 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 8,607 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 104,240 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 12,509 Construction Services $ 7,297 City Project Administration $ 2,085 Legal $ 1,042 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 22,933 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 127,173 Packet Page 501 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # Y 80th and 204th - easement Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,092 $ 2,092 $ - 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 725 $ 725 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 725 $ 725 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 0 $ 4 $ - 6 Pavement Removal SY 0 $ 20 $ - 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 725 $ 725 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 145 $ 80 $ 11,600 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 2 $ 750 $ 1,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 233 $ 20 $ 4,653 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 598 $ 598 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 399 $ 399 Subtotal $ 23,017 30% Contingency $ 6,905 Subtotal $ 29,922 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 2,693 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 32,615 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 3,914 Construction Services $ 2,283 City Project Administration $ 652 Legal $ 326 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 7,175 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 39,790 Packet Page 502 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # Z 73rd and 228th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 9,988 $ 9,988 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 3,875 $ 3,875 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 3,875 $ 3,875 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 3,875 $ 3,875 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 950 $ 4 $ 3,800 6 Pavement Removal SY 303 $ 20 $ 6,056 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 3,875 $ 3,875 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 754 $ 27 $ 20,358 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 175 $ 80 $ 14,000 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 15 $ 750 $ 11,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 458 $ 20 $ 9,165 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 107 $ 25 $ 2,674 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 53 $ 25 $ 1,337 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 78 $ 140 $ 10,983 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 2,854 $ 2,854 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,902 $ 1,902 Subtotal $ 109,867 30% Contingency $ 32,960 Subtotal $ 142,827 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 12,854 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 155,681 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 18,682 Construction Services $ 10,898 City Project Administration $ 3,114 Legal $ 1,557 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 34,250 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 189,931 Packet Page 503 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # AA 9th and 225th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 1,222 $ 1,222 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 120 $ 4 $ 480 6 Pavement Removal SY 33 $ 20 $ 667 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 128 $ 27 $ 3,456 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 3 $ 750 $ 2,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 42 $ 20 $ 846 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 10 $ 25 $ 246 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 5 $ 25 $ 123 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 4 $ 140 $ 571 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 349 $ 349 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 233 $ 233 Subtotal $ 13,443 30% Contingency $ 4,033 Subtotal $ 17,476 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 1,573 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 19,048 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 2,286 Construction Services $ 1,333 City Project Administration $ 381 Legal $ 190 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 4,191 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 23,239 Packet Page 504 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # BB 7th and Daley Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,555 $ 2,555 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 160 $ 4 $ 640 6 Pavement Removal SY 44 $ 20 $ 889 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 497 $ 27 $ 13,419 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 4 $ 750 $ 3,000 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 56 $ 20 $ 1,128 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 13 $ 25 $ 328 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 7 $ 25 $ 164 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 5 $ 140 $ 762 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 730 $ 730 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 487 $ 487 Subtotal $ 28,100 30% Contingency $ 8,430 Subtotal $ 36,531 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 3,288 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 39,818 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 4,778 Construction Services $ 2,787 City Project Administration $ 796 Legal $ 398 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 8,760 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 48,578 Packet Page 505 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # CC 202nd and 75th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,024 $ 2,024 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS $ 1,500 $ - 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF $ 4 $ - 6 Pavement Removal SY $ 20 $ - 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 318 $ 27 $ 8,586 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 6 $ 750 $ 4,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 85 $ 20 $ 1,692 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 0 $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 578 $ 578 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 386 $ 386 Subtotal $ 22,266 30% Contingency $ 6,680 Subtotal $ 28,946 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 2,605 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 31,551 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 3,786 Construction Services $ 2,209 City Project Administration $ 631 Legal $ 316 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 6,941 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 38,492 Packet Page 506 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # DID 180th and Kairez - easement Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 1,467 $ 1,467 $ - 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 525 $ 525 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 525 $ 525 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF $ 4 $ - 6 Pavement Removal SY $ 20 $ - 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 525 $ 525 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 105 $ 80 $ 8,400 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 1 $ 750 $ 750 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 162 $ 20 $ 3,243 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 0 $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 419 $ 419 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 279 $ 279 Subtotal $ 16,133 30% Contingency $ 4,840 Subtotal $ 20,973 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 1,888 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 22,861 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 2,743 Construction Services $ 1,600 City Project Administration $ 457 Legal $ 229 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 5,029 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 27,890 Packet Page 507 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # EE 216th and SR 99 Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,783 $ 2,783 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 120 $ 4 $ 480 6 Pavement Removal SY 33 $ 20 $ 667 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 336 $ 27 $ 9,072 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 3 $ 750 $ 2,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 42 $ 20 $ 846 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 10 $ 25 $ 246 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 5 $ 25 $ 123 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 4 $ 140 $ 571 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 795 $ 795 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 530 $ 530 Subtotal $ 30,613 30% Contingency $ 9,184 Subtotal $ 39,797 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 3,582 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 43,379 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 5,205 Construction Services $ 3,037 City Project Administration $ 868 Legal $ 434 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 9,543 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 52,922 Packet Page 508 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # FF 75th and 218th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 5,728 $ 5,728 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,000 $ 1,000 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 160 $ 4 $ 640 6 Pavement Removal SY 44 $ 20 $ 889 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF 328 $ 130 $ 42,640 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 4 $ 750 $ 3,000 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 56 $ 20 $ 1,128 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 13 $ 25 $ 328 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 7 $ 25 $ 164 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 5 $ 140 $ 762 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,637 $ 1,637 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,091 $ 1,091 Subtotal $ 63,006 30% Contingency $ 18,902 Subtotal $ 81,907 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 7,372 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 89,279 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 10,713 Construction Services $ 6,250 City Project Administration $ 1,786 Legal $ 893 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 19,641 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 108,920 Packet Page 509 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # GG Walnut and 10th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 8,110 $ 8,110 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,310 $ 1,310 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,310 $ 1,310 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,310 $ 1,310 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 884 $ 4 $ 3,536 6 Pavement Removal SY 304 $ 20 $ 6,077 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,310 $ 1,310 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 262 $ 100 $ 26,200 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 9 $ 750 $ 6,750 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 496 $ 20 $ 9,926 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 116 $ 25 $ 2,900 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 58 $ 25 $ 1,450 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 108 $ 140 $ 15,162 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 2,317 $ 2,317 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,545 $ 1,545 Subtotal $ 89,212 30% Contingency $ 26,764 Subtotal $ 115,976 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 10,438 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 126,414 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 15,170 Construction Services $ 8,849 City Project Administration $ 2,528 Legal $ 1,264 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 27,811 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 154,225 Packet Page 510 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # HH Pioneer and Shell Valley Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 8,419 $ 8,419 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,340 $ 1,340 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,340 $ 1,340 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,340 $ 1,340 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 736 $ 4 $ 2,944 6 Pavement Removal SY 264 $ 20 $ 5,281 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,340 $ 1,340 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 15-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 268 $ 130 $ 34,840 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 5 $ 750 $ 3,750 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 448 $ 20 $ 8,968 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 105 $ 25 $ 2,621 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 52 $ 25 $ 1,311 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 108 $ 140 $ 15,109 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 2,405 $ 2,405 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,604 $ 1,604 Subtotal $ 92,611 30% Contingency $ 27,783 Subtotal $ 120,395 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 10,836 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 131,230 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 15,748 Construction Services $ 9,186 City Project Administration $ 2,625 Legal $ 1,312 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 28,871 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 160,101 Packet Page 511 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # II Maple and 93rd Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 15,257 $ 15,257 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 3,105 $ 3,105 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 3,105 $ 3,105 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 3,105 $ 3,105 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1322 $ 4 $ 5,288 6 Pavement Removal SY 505 $ 20 $ 10,107 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 3,105 $ 3,105 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 621 $ 90 $ 55,890 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 2 $ 750 $ 1,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 904 $ 20 $ 18,076 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 211 $ 25 $ 5,287 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 106 $ 25 $ 2,644 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 244 $ 140 $ 34,097 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 4,359 $ 4,359 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 2,906 $ 2,906 Subtotal $ 167,832 30% Contingency $ 50,350 Subtotal $ 218,182 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 19,636 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 237,818 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 28,538 Construction Services $ 16,647 City Project Administration $ 4,756 Legal $ 2,378 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 52,320 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 290,138 Packet Page 512 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # JJ 75th and 162nd Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 5,772 $ 5,772 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,070 $ 1,070 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,070 $ 1,070 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,070 $ 1,070 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 628 $ 4 $ 2,512 6 Pavement Removal SY 222 $ 20 $ 4,441 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,070 $ 1,070 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 214 $ 80 $ 17,120 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 5 $ 750 $ 3,750 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 372 $ 20 $ 7,445 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 87 $ 25 $ 2,176 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 44 $ 25 $ 1,088 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 87 $ 140 $ 12,160 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,649 $ 1,649 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,099 $ 1,099 Subtotal $ 63,492 30% Contingency $ 19,048 Subtotal $ 82,539 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 7,429 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 89,968 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 10,796 Construction Services $ 6,298 City Project Administration $ 1,799 Legal $ 900 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 19,793 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 109,761 Packet Page 513 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # KK Edmonds and 12th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 7,207 $ 7,207 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,345 $ 1,345 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,345 $ 1,345 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,345 $ 1,345 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 778 $ 4 $ 3,112 6 Pavement Removal SY 276 $ 20 $ 5,519 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,345 $ 1,345 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 269 $ 80 $ 21,520 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 6 $ 750 $ 4,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 464 $ 20 $ 9,278 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 108 $ 25 $ 2,711 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 54 $ 25 $ 1,356 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 109 $ 140 $ 15,259 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 2,059 $ 2,059 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,373 $ 1,373 Subtotal $ 79,272 30% Contingency $ 23,782 Subtotal $ 103,054 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 9,275 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 112,329 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 13,479 Construction Services $ 7,863 City Project Administration $ 2,247 Legal $ 1,123 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 24,712 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 137,041 Packet Page 514 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # ILL Puget and Sound View - easement Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,262 $ 2,262 $ - 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF $ 4 $ - 6 Pavement Removal SY $ 20 $ - 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,750 $ 1,750 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 336 $ 27 $ 9,072 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 7 $ 750 $ 5,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 99 $ 20 $ 1,974 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 0 $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 646 $ 646 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 431 $ 431 Subtotal $ 24,886 30% Contingency $ 7,466 Subtotal $ 32,351 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 2,912 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 35,263 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 4,232 Construction Services $ 2,468 City Project Administration $ 705 Legal $ 353 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 7,758 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 43,021 Packet Page 515 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # MM SR 99 and 224th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 6,036 $ 6,036 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 650 $ 650 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 2,500 $ 2,500 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 260 $ 4 $ 1,040 6 Pavement Removal SY 101 $ 20 $ 2,023 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 15-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 130 $ 130 $ 16,900 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA $ 750 $ - 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 183 $ 20 $ 3,666 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 43 $ 25 $ 1,073 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 21 $ 25 $ 536 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 51 $ 140 $ 7,098 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,725 $ 1,725 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,150 $ 1,150 Subtotal $ 66,396 30% Contingency $ 19,919 Subtotal $ 86,315 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 7,768 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 94,083 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 11,290 Construction Services $ 6,586 City Project Administration $ 1,882 Legal $ 941 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 20,698 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 114,78E Packet Page 516 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # NN Dayton and 3rd Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 17,404 $ 17,404 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1146 $ 4 $ 4,584 6 Pavement Removal SY 397 $ 20 $ 7,937 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 3,000 $ 3,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 18-inch LF 159 $ 60 $ 9,540 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 18-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 353 $ 180 $ 63,540 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA 3 $ 4,000 $ 12,000 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF 6 $ 300 $ 1,800 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 11 $ 750 $ 8,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 653 $ 20 $ 13,057 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 153 $ 25 $ 3,814 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 76 $ 25 $ 1,907 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 145 $ 140 $ 20,321 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 4,972 $ 4,972 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 3,315 $ 3,315 Subtotal $ 191,441 30% Contingency $ 57,432 Subtotal $ 248,873 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 22,399 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 271,272 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 32,553 Construction Services $ 18,989 City Project Administration $ 5,425 Legal $ 2,713 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 59,680 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 330,952 Packet Page 517 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # 00 83rd and 204th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,007 $ 2,007 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS $ 2,500 $ - 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 640 $ 640 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 640 $ 640 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF $ 4 $ - 6 Pavement Removal SY $ 20 $ - 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 640 $ 640 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 128 $ 90 $ 11,520 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 2 $ 750 $ 1,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 209 $ 20 $ 4,174 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 0 $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 573 $ 573 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 382 $ 382 Subtotal $ 22,076 30% Contingency $ 6,623 Subtotal $ 28,699 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 2,583 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 31,282 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 3,754 Construction Services $ 2,190 City Project Administration $ 626 Legal $ 313 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 6,882 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 38,164 Packet Page 518 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # PP Sound View and Water Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 5,745 $ 5,745 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 240 $ 4 $ 960 6 Pavement Removal SY 67 $ 20 $ 1,333 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF 295 $ 130 $ 38,350 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 6 $ 750 $ 4,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 85 $ 20 $ 1,692 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 20 $ 25 $ 492 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 10 $ 25 $ 246 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 8 $ 140 $ 1,142 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 1,641 $ 1,641 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,094 $ 1,094 Subtotal $ 63,197 30% Contingency $ 18,959 Subtotal $ 82,155 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 7,394 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 89,549 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 10,746 Construction Services $ 6,268 City Project Administration $ 1,791 Legal $ 895 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 19,701 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 109,250 Packet Page 519 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # QQ 83rd and 202nd - easement Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,833 $ 2,833 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS $ 2,500 $ - 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 870 $ 870 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 870 $ 870 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF $ 4 $ - 6 Pavement Removal SY $ 20 $ - 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 870 $ 870 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 174 $ 100 $ 17,400 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 2 $ 750 $ 1,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 274 $ 20 $ 5,471 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 0 $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 809 $ 809 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 540 $ 540 Subtotal $ 31,163 30% Contingency $ 9,349 Subtotal $ 40,512 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 3,646 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 44,158 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 5,299 Construction Services $ 3,091 City Project Administration $ 883 Legal $ 442 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 9,715 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 53,872 Packet Page 520 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # RR Maple and 10th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 11,705 $ 11,705 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,660 $ 1,660 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,660 $ 1,660 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,660 $ 1,660 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 984 $ 4 $ 3,936 6 Pavement Removal SY 347 $ 20 $ 6,944 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,660 $ 1,660 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 15-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 332 $ 130 $ 43,160 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA 2 $ 4,000 $ 8,000 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF 4 $ 300 $ 1,200 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 8 $ 750 $ 6,000 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 581 $ 20 $ 11,618 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 136 $ 25 $ 3,395 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 68 $ 25 $ 1,698 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 135 $ 140 $ 18,889 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 3,344 $ 3,344 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 2,230 $ 2,230 Subtotal $ 128,758 30% Contingency $ 38,628 Subtotal $ 167,386 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 15,065 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 182,451 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 21,894 Construction Services $ 12,772 City Project Administration $ 3,649 Legal $ 1,825 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 40,139 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 222,590 Packet Page 521 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # SS Walnut and 96th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 10,011 $ 10,011 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 1,655 $ 1,655 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 1,655 $ 1,655 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 1,655 $ 1,655 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1062 $ 4 $ 4,248 6 Pavement Removal SY 369 $ 20 $ 7,372 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 1,655 $ 1,655 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 331 $ 100 $ 33,100 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 10 $ 750 $ 7,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 608 $ 20 $ 12,154 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 142 $ 25 $ 3,551 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 71 $ 25 $ 1,775 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 136 $ 140 $ 19,025 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 2,860 $ 2,860 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 1,907 $ 1,907 Subtotal $ 110,124 30% Contingency $ 33,037 Subtotal $ 143,161 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 12,884 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 156,045 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 18,725 Construction Services $ 10,923 City Project Administration $ 3,121 Legal $ 1,560 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 34,330 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 190,375 Packet Page 522 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # TT Pine and SR 104 Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 19,037 $ 19,037 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS $ 2,500 $ - 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF $ 4 $ - 6 Pavement Removal SY $ 20 $ - 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 42-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 526 $ 200 $ 105,200 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 3 $ 750 $ 2,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 443 $ 20 $ 8,851 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 0 $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 5,439 $ 5,439 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 3,626 $ 3,626 Subtotal $ 209,403 30% Contingency $ 62,821 Subtotal $ 272,224 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 24,500 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 296,724 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 35,607 Construction Services $ 20,771 City Project Administration $ 5,934 Legal $ 2,967 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 65,279 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 362,003 Packet Page 523 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # UU 75th and 165th Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,952 $ 2,952 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 580 $ 580 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 580 $ 580 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 580 $ 580 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 232 $ 4 $ 928 6 Pavement Removal SY 112 $ 20 $ 2,249 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 580 $ 580 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 116 $ 80 $ 9,280 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 2 $ 750 $ 1,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 192 $ 20 $ 3,835 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 44 $ 25 $ 1,096 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 22 $ 25 $ 548 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 45 $ 140 $ 6,360 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 844 $ 844 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 562 $ 562 Subtotal $ 32,476 30% Contingency $ 9,743 Subtotal $ 42,218 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 3,800 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 46,018 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 5,522 Construction Services $ 3,221 City Project Administration $ 920 Legal $ 460 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 10,124 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 56,142 Packet Page 524 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # VV 7th and Bell Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 1,100 $ 1,100 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 500 $ 500 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 500 $ 500 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 500 $ 500 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 80 $ 4 $ 320 6 Pavement Removal SY 22 $ 20 $ 444 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 500 $ 500 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF 186 $ 27 $ 5,022 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 2 $ 750 $ 1,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 28 $ 20 $ 564 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 7 $ 25 $ 164 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 3 $ 25 $ 82 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 3 $ 140 $ 381 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 314 $ 314 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 210 $ 210 Subtotal $ 12,101 30% Contingency $ 3,630 Subtotal $ 15,732 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 1,416 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 17,147 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 2,058 Construction Services $ 1,200 City Project Administration $ 343 Legal $ 171 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 3,772 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 20,920 Packet Page 525 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # WW 8th and Driftwood - easement Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 2,609 $ 2,609 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS $ 2,500 $ - 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF $ 4 $ - 6 Pavement Removal SY $ 20 $ - 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 750 $ 750 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF 150 $ 130 $ 19,500 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 12-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 100 $ - 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 3 $ 750 $ 2,250 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 42 $ 20 $ 846 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN $ 25 $ - 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 0 $ 25 $ - 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN $ 140 $ - 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 745 $ 745 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 497 $ 497 Subtotal $ 28,697 30% Contingency $ 8,609 Subtotal $ 37,306 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 3,358 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 40,664 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 4,880 Construction Services $ 2,846 City Project Administration $ 813 Legal $ 407 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 8,946 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 49,610 Packet Page 526 of 895 Comprehensive Sewer Plan 2013 Capital Improvement Projects Cost Estimate CIP # XX 3rd and Walnut Item Item Description No. Unit Quantity Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $ 22,511 $ 22,511 2 Traffic Control Labor and Equipment LS 1 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 3 Dewatering LS 1 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 4 Sheeting, Shoring and Bracing LS 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 5 Sawcutting Pavement LF 1282 $ 4 $ 5,128 6 Pavement Removal SY 454 $ 20 $ 9,084 7 Temporary Sewer Bypass LS 1 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 8 Pipe Bursting, Ex 8" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 9 Pipe Bursting, Ex 10" to 12" Dia LF $ 130 $ - 10 Pipe Bursting, Ex 12" to 15" Dia LF $ 150 $ - 11 CIPP - 8-inch LF $ 27 $ - 12 CIPP - 10-inch LF $ 31 $ - 13 CIPP - 12-inch LF $ 45 $ - 14 8-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 80 $ - 15 10-inch Sanitary Sewer LF $ 90 $ - 16 42-inch Sanitary Sewer LF 441 $ 200 $ 88,200 17 48-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 4,000 $ - 18 48-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 300 $ - 19 Lateral Connection, 6-inch PVC EA 10 $ 750 $ 7,500 20 Import Trench Backfill TN 763 $ 20 $ 15,256 21 Crushed Surfacing, Base Course TN 178 $ 25 $ 4,458 22 Crushed Surfacing, Top Course TN 89 $ 25 $ 2,229 23 HMA Trench Patch, CL 1/2, PG 58-22 TN 179 $ 140 $ 25,031 24 Pump Station - Mechanical LS $ 100,000 $ - 25 Pump Station - Electrical LS $ 53,000 $ - 26 Above Grade Structure LS $ 125,000 $ - 27 Emergency Generator LS $ 40,000 $ - 28 8-inch Force Main LF $ 45 $ - 29 96-inch Dia Manhole, 0' to 8' deep EA $ 15,000 $ - 30 96-inch Dia Manhole, extra depth VF $ 500 $ - 31 Restoration LS 1 $ 6,432 $ 6,432 32 Cleanup and Testing LS 1 $ 4,288 $ 4,288 Subtotal $ 247,616 30% Contingency $ 74,285 Subtotal $ 321,901 9.0% State Sales Tax $ 28,971 Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 350,872 PROJECT ALLIED COSTS Engineering Design, Survey, Geotechnical and Permits $ 42,105 Construction Services $ 24,561 City Project Administration $ 7,017 Legal $ 3,509 Subtotal Project Allied Costs $ 77,192 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 428,064 Packet Page 527 of 895 APPENDIX F Known Collection System Deficiencies Table F.1— Red Area Jetting Table F.2 — Granite O&M Segments Table F.3—Granite Known Deficiencies—Trenchless Table F.4 — Granite Known Deficiencies — Dig up and Replace Table F.5 — Capacity Table F.6 — Ranking — All Categories Table F.7 — Ranking — Without Granite O&M Table F.8 — Ranking — Granite Only Packet Page 528 of 895 Table F.1 Red Area Jetting No. Location Alk Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description Red Area Jetting RA-1 16131 75th Place West Grease E 1-36 to 1-36A 211 PVC 1 RA-2 7117 176th St. SW Dirt, Grease, Grit 3-93 to 3-94 150 Conc 3 RA-3 7601 OVD Post Office Grit 5-325 to 5-328 350 Conc 5 RA-4 18209 76th Ave West Grit 5-325 to 5-511-11 80 Conc 5 RA-5 Dellwood Dr. at 78th Ave W Black Water 5-191 to 5-187 200 Conc 5 RA-6 8015 196th St SW 5-334A CO to main 60 PVC 5 RA-7 Admiral Way Grease 7-3 to 7-2 425 Conc 7 RA-8 Admiral Way Grease 7-4 to 7-3 380 Conc 7 RA-9 Admiral Way Grease 7-5 to 7-4 380 Conc 7 RA-10 Admiral Way Grease 7-6 to 7-5 280 Conc 7 RA-11 Admiral Way at West Dayton Grit 7-6 to CO 125 Conc 7 RA-12 Admiral Way at Dayton Grease 7-11 to 7-10 80 Conc 7 RA-13 Admiral Way at Dayton Grease 7-7 to 7-11 37 Conc 7 RA-14 Admiral Way Grease 7-7 to 7-6 35 Conc 7 RA-15 7th at Edmonds St None 8-99 to 8-98 102 Conc 8 RA-16 7th Ave at Edmonds St Black Water 8-99 to 8-101A 207 Conc 8 RA-17 7th Ave at Sprague St None 8-316 to 8-99 290 Conc 8 RA-18 7th Ave N. at Daley Grit, Black Water 8-135 to 8-316 300 Conc 8 RA-19 Alder St at Yost Park Grit (a lot) 8-328 to 8-2 265 Conc 8 RA-20 1053 Alder Street Grit (a lot) 8-32A to 8-32B 55 Conc 8 RA-21 10th at Alder Street Grit (a lot) 8-31 to 8-32 336 Conc 8 RA-22 942 Alder Street Grit (a lot) 8-30 to 8-31 275 Conc 8 RA-23 1048 Walnut Street Grit (a lot) 8-2A to 8-2 205 Conc 8 RA-24 1033 Walnut Street Grit 8-3 to 8-2A 130 Conc 8 RA-25 10th Ave South at Walnut St Grit (a lot) 8-4 to 8-3 335 Conc 8 RA-26 935 Walnut Street Grit (a lot) 8-5 to 8-4 260 Conc 8 RA-27 Pine Ridge Park Black Water 8-202 to 8-201 165 Conc 9 RA-28 Pine Ridge Park Black Water 9-20 to 9-202 430 Conc 9 RA-29 Bpind Ridge Park Black Water 9-202 to 9-224 503 Conc 9 RA-30 8610 Main Street Black Water 9-19 to 9-20 56 Conc 9 RA-31 8610 Main Street Grit 9-16 to 9-19 178 Conc 9 RA-32 7703 203 Street SW Grit 9-314 to 9-313 310 Conc 9 RA-33 7726 202 Place Grit, Black Water 9-366 to 9-314 350 Conc 9 RA-34 7804 200th Street Black Water 9-347 to 9-346 130 Conc 9 RA-35 7907 200th Street (Drop MH) Black Water 9-348 to 9-347 400 Conc 9 RA-36 8705 Maplewood Lane Grit, Black Water 9-137 to 9-138 340 Conc 9 RA-37 8620 Maplewood Lane Grit (a lot) 9-139 to 9-137 155 Conc 9 RA-38 76th at 212th Street S.W. Grease 9-254 to 9-255 305 Conc 9 RA-39 21309 76th Ave W (Drop MH) Grit, Black Water 14-40 to 9-254 330 Conc 9 and 14 RA-40 7122 210th Street Grease 10-23 to 10-25 283 Conc 10 RA-41 1153 8th Ave S. Grit, Black Water 12-189 to 12-190 c/o 120 Conc 12 RA-42 1115 8th Ave S. Grit, Black Water 12-191 to 12-189 285 Conc 12 RA-43 736 Fir Street Black Water 12-192 to 12-191 200 Conc 12 RA-44 9223 216th Street Black Water 12-156 to 13-96 380 Conc 12 and 13 RA-45 9126 Bowdoin N/A C/O C/O PVC 13 RA-46 72nd Ave W. at 215th St Black Water 14-7A to 14-7B 255 Conc 14 RA-47 72nd Ave West at 215th St Grit, Black Water 14-7 to 14-7A 275 Conc 14 RA-48 215th At 72nd Black Water 14-6 to 14-7 260 Conc 14 RA-49 21808 Highway 99 Black Water 14-22 to 14-24 360 Conc 14 RA-50 74th at 228th St Grease 14-65 to 14-66 320 Conc 14 RA-51 240th At Highway 99 None 16-60 to 16-59 330 Conc 16 RA-52 240th St and 78th Ave W Grit, Black Water 16-77 to 16-65 275 Conc 16 RA-53 240th at 78th Ave W Black Water 16-76 to 16-77 160 Conc 16 RA-54 76th Ave W. at 242nd St Black Water 7-81 to 17-80 360 Conc 17 RA-55 24122 76th Ave W Black Water 17-82 to 17-81 105 Conc 17 RA-56 23819 76th Ave W Black Water 17-72 to Main 44 Conc 17 RA-57 123821 76th Ave Grease 17-73 to 17-69 232 1 Conc 17 Miscellaneous MM-1 Meter Maintenance Edmonds Way Robinhood Lanes Brush Sensor 15 MM-2 244th and Hwy 99 - NW Corner Clean Flume MM-3 Denny's on SR 104 and Hwy 99 Clean Flume 16 MM-4 Old Ballinger Pump Station Clean Flume 17 MM-5 East Side, NE Comer of Ballinger PS Clean Flume 17 MM-6 Lake Ballinger Way and 205th St Clean Flume MM-7 Ballinger Golf Course at 74th Ave Clean Flume 17 MM-8 SE Corner of Hwy 99 and 224th St Clean Flume 14 MM-9 122304 Hwy 99 1 Clean Flume I I 1 1 14 Packet Page 529 of 895 a Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location 77777 Reason k Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description GRANITE Non-CIP Light Roots LRA Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-170-4-171 0 LR-2 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-186A-4-186 0 LR-3 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-221-4-220 0 LR-4 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-123-4-186A 0 LR-5 Lift Station 3 Light Root Problem 4-69A-4-70 0 LR-6 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-212-4-213 0 LR-7 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-137-4-133 0 LR-8 Lift Station 10 Light Root Problem 4-9-4-7 0 LR-9 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-278-5-271 0 LR-10 Lift Station 3 Light Root Problem 4-45-4-46 0 LRA 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-145-4-143 0 LR-12 Lift Station 3 Light Root Problem 4-46-4-47 0 LR-13 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-115-8-219H 0 LR-14 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-74-5-72 0 LR-15 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-278-5-271 0 LR-16 Lift Station 3 Light Root Problem 4-52-4-52A 0 LR-17 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-122-5-121 0 LR-18 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-141-4-142 0 LR-19 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-118C-5-118B 0 LR-20 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-140-4-139 0 LR-21 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-278-5-271 0 LR-22 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-311-8-312 0 LR-23 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-44-8-45 0 LR-24 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-44-8-45 0 LR-25 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-244-8-243 0 LR-26 Lift Station 10 Light Root Problem 5-89-5-99 0 LR-27 Lift Station 10 Light Root Problem 2-112-2-111 8 LR-28 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-138-4-137 0 LR-29 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 LR-30 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-209-8-210 0 LR-31 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 3-121-3-120 0 LR-32 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-138-4-137 0 LR-33 Lift Station 4 Light Root Problem 2-31-2-32 0 LR-34 Lift Station 4 Light Root Problem 2-31-2-32 0 LR-35 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 3-121-3-120 0 LR-36 Lift Station 4 Light Root Problem 2-84-2-83 0 LR-37 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 3-133-3-134 0 LR-38 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 3-109H-3-109G 0 LR-39 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 3-109G-3-109F 0 LR-40 Lift Station 10 Light Root Problem 2-113A-2-113 0 LR-41 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 3-63-3-64 0 LR-42 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 3-131-3-132 0 LR-43 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-110-4-109 0 LR-44 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-172K-8-172G 0 LR-45 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-78-8-244 0 LR-46 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 LR-47 Lift Station 9 Light Root Problem 5-299-5-300 0 LR-48 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 LR-49 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-260-5-344 0 LR-50 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-252A-5-252B 0 LR-51 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-78-8-244 0 LR-52 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-75-5-74 0 LR-53 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-246-5-245 0 LR-54 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 LR-55 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 LR-56 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-311-8-312 0 LR-57 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-110-4-109 0 LR-58 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-109-4-108 0 LR-59 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 LR-60 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 LR-61 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-95-8-96 0 LR-62 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-110-4-109 0 LR-63 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-260-5-344 0 LR-64 Lift Station 9 Light Root Problem 5-330-5-329 0 LR-65 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-267-5-261 0 LR-66 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-78-8-77 0 LR-67 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-72-8-73 0 LR-68 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-78-8-77 0 Packet Page 530 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description LR-69 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-137-8-292A 0 LR-70 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-71 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-331-8-330 0 LR-72 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-44A-8-331 0 LR-73 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-72-8-73 0 LR-74 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-317-8-316 0 LR-75 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-76 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-77 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LR-78 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LR-79 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-321-7-72 0 LR-80 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LR-81 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 LR-82 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 LR-83 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 LR-84 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-19-11-18 0 LR-85 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-34-7-30 0 LR-86 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-260-5-344 0 LR-87 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-2A-8-3 0 LR-88 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-331-8-330 0 LR-89 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-39A-8-41 0 LR-90 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 LR-91 Lift Station 7 Light Root Problem 7-9-7-10 0 LR-92 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-55-8-55A 0 LR-93 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-21A-8-51 0 LR-94 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-21A-8-51 0 LR-95 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-51-8-50 0 LR-96 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-97 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-35-7-33B 0 LR-98 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LR-99 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-77-8-76 0 LR-100 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-2A-8-3 0 LR-101 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-102 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-13-8-21A 0 LR-103 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-13-8-21A 0 LR-104 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-332-8-331 0 LR-105 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-72-8-73 0 LR-106 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-9-7-10 0 LR-107 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-108 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-2-8-2A 0 LR-109 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-44A-8-331 0 LR-110 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LRA 11 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LRA 12 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-21-8-21A 0 LRA 13 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-288-8-287 0 LRA 14 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-6413-8-64A 0 LRA 15 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-77-8-76 0 LRA 16 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-21A-8-51 0 LRA 17 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-69-8-70 0 LRA 18 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-646-8-64A 0 LRA 19 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-120 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-51-8-50 0 LR-121 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-72-8-73 0 LR-122 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-101A-8-100 0 LR-123 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-101A-8-100 0 LR-124 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-101A-8-100 0 LR-125 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-101A-8-100 0 LR-126 Lift Station 7 Light Root Problem 7-9-7-10 0 LR-127 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LR-128 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-101A-8-100 0 LR-129 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-130 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-321-7-72 0 LR-131 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-6413-8-64A 0 LR-132 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-133 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-332-8-331 0 LR-134 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-51-8-50 0 LR-135 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-101 B-8-1 01 A 0 LR-136 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-101 B-8-1 01 A 0 LR-137 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-288-8-287 0 LR-138 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-254-8-253 0 Packet Page 531 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description LR-139 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-39A-8-41 0 LR-140 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-21A-8-51 0 LR-141 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-51-8-50 0 LR-142 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-317-8-316 0 LR-143 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-39A-8-41 0 LR-144 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-78-8-77 0 LR-145 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-2-8-2A 0 LR-146 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-44A-8-331 0 LR-147 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-72-8-73 0 LR-148 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-149 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-332-8-331 0 LR-150 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-34-7-30 0 LR-151 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LR-152 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-102-8-101 0 LR-153 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-21-8-21A 0 LR-154 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-321-7-72 0 LR-155 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-162-8-161 0 LR-156 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 0 LR-157 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-87-8-86 0 LR-158 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-87-8-86 0 LR-159 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-87-8-86 0 LR-160 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-86-8-112 0 LR-161 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-86-8-112 0 LR-162 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-86-8-112 0 LR-163 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-112-8-117 0 LR-164 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-264-9-266 0 LR-165 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-87-8-86 0 LR-166 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-54-8-56 0 LR-167 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-66-8-327 0 LR-168 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-112-8-117 0 LR-169 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-87-8-86 0 LR-170 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-249-8-265 0 LR-171 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-291-8-283 0 LR-172 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-291A-8-291 0 LR-173 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 LR-174 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-66-8-327 0 LR-175 Metro Light Root Problem 9-26213-9-262A 0 LR-176 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 0 LR-177 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-167-8-165 0 LR-178 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-112-8-117 0 LR-179 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 9-109-8-193 3 LR-180 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-66-8-327 0 LR-181 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 3 LR-182 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-291-8-283 0 LR-183 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-291A-8-291 0 LR-184 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-177-8-176 0 LR-185 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 LR-186 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 0 LR-187 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-54-8-56 0 LR-188 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 LR-189 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-87-8-86 0 LR-190 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 0 LR-191 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-87-8-86 0 LR-192 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-112-8-117 0 LR-193 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-321-7-72 0 LR-194 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-54-8-56 0 LR-195 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-281-8-282 0 LR-196 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-165-12-164 0 LR-197 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-243-12-241 0 LR-198 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-243-12-241 0 LR-199 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-123-8-120 0 LR-200 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-291-8-283 0 LR-201 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-239-8-238 0 LR-202 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-123-8-120 0 LR-203 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 LR-204 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-344-5-345 0 LR-205 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-112-8-117 0 LR-206 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-195-5-195A 0 LR-207 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-195-5-195A 0 LR-208 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-123-8-120 0 Packet Page 532 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description LR-209 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-291-8-283 0 LR-210 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-194-5-195 0 LR-211 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-66-8-327 0 LR-212 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-123-8-120 0 LR-213 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-54-8-56 0 LR-214 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-291-8-283 0 LR-215 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 LR-216 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-219A-8-219C 0 LR-217 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-152-8-150 0 LR-218 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-135-8-136 0 LR-219 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-87-12-86 0 LR-220 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-60-7-56 0 LR-221 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-188A-8-188C 0 LR-222 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-223 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-284F-12-284 0 LR-224 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-101-12-95 0 LR-225 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-135-8-136 0 LR-226 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-184-8-186 0 LR-227 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-228 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-332-8-331 0 LR-229 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46-7-47 0 LR-230 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-231 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-78-12-77 0 LR-232 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-30-8-29 0 LR-233 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-234 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-60-7-56 0 LR-235 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-236 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-237 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-238 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-239 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-240 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-151-12-22 0 LR-241 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-34-7-30 0 LR-242 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-38-7-36 0 LR-243 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-135-8-136 0 LR-244 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-18-8-55 0 LR-245 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-86-7-87A 0 LR-246 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-18-8-55 0 LR-247 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-83-7-84 0 LR-248 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-34-7-30 0 LR-249 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-35-7-33B 0 LR-250 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-251 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-252 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-82-7-83 0 LR-253 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-254 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-60-7-56 0 LR-255 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46A-7-46 0 LR-256 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46-7-47 0 LR-257 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-258 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-259 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-260 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-261 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-262 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-60-7-56 0 LR-263 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-23413-12-234 0 LR-264 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-83-7-84 0 LR-265 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-74-12-73 0 LR-266 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-72-12-71 0 LR-267 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-268 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-34-7-30 0 LR-269 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-38-7-36 0 LR-270 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-135-8-136 0 LR-271 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46-7-47 0 LR-272 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-86-7-87A 0 LR-273 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-95-12-94 0 LR-274 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-275 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-83-7-84 0 LR-276 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-89-12-88 0 LR-277 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46-7-47 0 LR-278 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 Packet Page 533 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description LR-279 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-71-12-89 0 LR-280 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-85-7-86 0 LR-281 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-30-8-29 0 LR-282 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-283 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-95-12-94 0 LR-284 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46A-7-46 0 LR-285 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-62-7-61 0 LR-286 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-12-12-13 0 LR-287 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-87-12-86 0 LR-288 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-83-7-84 0 LR-289 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-290 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-35-7-33B 0 LR-291 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46-7-47 0 LR-292 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-293 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-294 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-295 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-296 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-297 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-298 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-299 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-300 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46A-7-46 0 LR-301 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-66-8-327 0 LR-302 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-30-8-29 0 LR-303 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-95-12-94 0 LR-304 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-95-12-94 0 LR-305 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-135-8-136 0 LR-306 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-87-12-86 0 LR-307 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-83-7-84 0 LR-308 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-309 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-72-12-71 0 LR-310 Metro Light Root Problem 9-262A-9-262 0 LR-311 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46-7-47 0 LR-312 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-22-12-20 0 LR-313 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-30-8-29 0 LR-314 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-315 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-60-7-56 0 LR-316 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-95-12-94 0 LR-317 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-135-8-136 0 LR-318 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-63-7-62 0 LR-319 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 LR-320 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-135-8-136 0 LR-321 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-17-8-18 0 LR-322 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-81-7-82 0 LR-323 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-18-8-55 0 LR-324 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-135-8-136 0 LR-325 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 LR-326 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-70-12-69 0 LR-327 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 LR-328 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-43-8-44 0 LR-329 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-185G-12-185F 0 LR-330 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 LR-331 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-185G-12-185F 0 LR-332 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 LR-333 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 LR-334 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-43-8-44 0 LR-335 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-18OA-12-180 0 LR-336 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-18-12-19 0 LR-337 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 LR-338 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 LR-339 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-226-12-225 0 LR-340 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-43-8-44 0 LR-341 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-182A-12-215 0 LR-342 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-182A-12-215 0 LR-343 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 LR-344 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-316-8-135 0 LR-345 Metro Light Root Problem 13-157-13-156 0 LR-346 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 LR-347 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 LR-348 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 Packet Page 534 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description LR-349 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-23A-11-21 0 LR-350 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-287-12-286 0 LR-351 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 LR-352 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-353 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-246-12-243 0 LR-354 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-316-8-135 0 LR-355 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 LR-356 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 LR-357 Metro Light Root Problem 13-157-13-156 0 LR-358 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 LR-359 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-46-7-47 0 LR-360 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 LR-361 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-84A-12-83 0 LR-362 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-43-8-44 0 LR-363 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 LR-364 Metro Light Root Problem 13-157-13-156 0 LR-365 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-246-12-243 0 LR-366 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-43-8-44 0 LR-367 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 LR-368 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 LR-369 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 LR-370 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-1-8-1 0 LR-371 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-159-9-158 0 LR-372 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-237-9-236 0 LR-373 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-18813-8-188A 0 LR-374 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-360-9-346 6 LR-375 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-187A-8-187 0 LR-376 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-289-8-288 0 LR-377 Lift Station 2 Light Root Problem 8-294-8-295 0 LR-378 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-299-9-298 0 LR-379 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-289-8-288 0 LR-380 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 9-134-9-136 0 LR-381 Lift Station 9 Light Root Problem 5-33413-5-334A 0 LR-382 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-299-9-298 0 LR-383 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 15-1C-15-2 0 LR-384 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-177-9-158A 0 LR-385 Lift Station 9 Light Root Problem 5-33413-5-334A 0 LR-386 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-363A-9-363 0 LR-387 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-135-8-136 0 LR-388 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-324-7-68 0 LR-389 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-363A-9-363 0 LR-390 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-324-7-68 0 LR-391 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-11-9-10 0 LR-392 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-193-8-192 4 LR-393 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-21A-11-21 0 LR-394 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-395 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-9A-7-35 0 LR-396 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-22513-9-225 0 LR-397 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-21A-11-21 0 LR-398 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 9-84-9-83 0 LR-399 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-12-11-11 0 LR-400 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-225-9-224 0 LR-401 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 9-84-9-83 0 LR-402 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-9A-7-35 0 LR-403 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-12-11-11 0 LR-404 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-225-9-224 10 LR-405 Metro Light Root Problem 16-54-16-57 0 LR-406 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 LR-407 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 9-85-9-86 0 LR-408 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 LR-409 Lift Station 9 Light Root Problem 9-150-5-336 0 LR-410 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-21A-11-21 0 LR-411 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-412 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-70-8-71 0 LR-413 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-70-8-71 0 LR-414 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-70-8-71 0 LR-415 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-70-8-71 0 LR-416 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-70-8-71 0 LR-417 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-23B-11-21 0 LR-418 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-14-11-13 0 Packet Page 535 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description LR-419 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-9A-7-35 0 LR-420 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-9A-7-35 0 LR-421 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-363A-9-363 0 LR-422 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-163-12-162 0 LR-423 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 LR-424 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-23B-11-21 0 LR-425 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-178A-8-177A 0 LR-426 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-19-12-28 0 LR-427 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-6-11-5 0 LR-428 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-5-11-3 0 LR-429 Metro Light Root Problem 17-15-17-16 0 LR-430 Metro Light Root Problem 13-133-13-134 0 LR-431 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 13-67-13-66 0 LR-432 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-19-12-28 0 LR-433 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-19-12-28 0 LR-434 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-5-11-3 0 LR-435 Metro Light Root Problem 16-46-16-47 0 LR-436 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 13-67-13-66 0 LR-437 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-195-8-196 4 LR-438 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-135-12-134 0 LR-439 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-5-11-3 0 LR-440 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-135-12-134 0 LR-441 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-108-12-109 0 LR-442 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-85K-8-85F 0 LR-443 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-19-12-28 0 LR-444 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-5-11-3 0 LR-445 Metro Light Root Problem 17-15-17-16 0 LR-446 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 13-67-13-66 0 LR-447 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 13-89-9-11 0 LR-448 Metro Light Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 LR-449 Metro Light Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 LR-450 Metro Light Root Problem 13-8-13-813 0 LR-451 Metro Light Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 LR-452 Metro Light Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 LR-453 Metro Light Root Problem 13-8A-13-8B 0 LR-454 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-46-8-47 0 LR-455 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 LR-456 Metro Light Root Problem 16-32-16-33 0 LR-457 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LR-458 Metro Light Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 LR-459 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 LR-460 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-289-8-288 0 LR-461 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-46-8-47 0 LR-462 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 LR-463 Metro Light Root Problem 16-33-16-36 0 LR-464 Metro Light Root Problem 14-33-14-32 0 LR-465 Metro Light Root Problem 13-22A-13-22B 0 LR-466 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-46-8-47 0 LR-467 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-197-8-199 0 LR-468 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-37-7-36 0 LR-469 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 LR-470 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-471 Metro Light Root Problem 16-108-16-109 0 LR-472 Metro Light Root Problem 16-108-16-109 0 LR-473 Metro Light Root Problem 16-91-16-103 0 LR-474 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-264-5-263 0 LR-475 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-71-8-72 0 LR-476 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-477 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-478 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-13-5-12 0 LR-479 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-323-8-321 0 LR-480 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-481 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-70-8-71 0 LR-482 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-71-8-72 0 LR-483 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-41-8-42 0 LR-484 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-485 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 LR-486 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-487 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 LR-488 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 Packet Page 536 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description LR-489 Metro Light Root Problem 16-9-16-8 0 LR-490 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 LR-491 Metro Light Root Problem 16-4-16-3 0 LR-492 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-70-8-71 0 LR-493 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 LR-494 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-31-8-30 0 LR-495 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-71-8-72 0 LR-496 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-218-5-210 0 LR-497 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-498 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-499 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-12-11-11 0 LR-500 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-217-12-216 0 LR-501 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-31-8-30 0 LR-502 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-5-8-6 0 LR-503 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-504 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 LR-505 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-74-12-73 0 LR-506 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-507 Metro Light Root Problem 14-7C-14-7A 0 LR-508 Metro Light Root Problem INLET-13-167 0 LR-509 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-71-8-72 0 LR-510 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-71-8-72 0 LR-511 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-291A-8-291 0 LR-512 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-30-4-28 0 LR-513 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-332-8-331 0 LR-514 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-70-8-71 0 LR-515 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-516 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-74-12-73 0 LR-517 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-79-7-80 0 LR-518 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 LR-519 Metro Light Root Problem 13-8A-13-8B 0 LR-520 Metro Light Root Problem 13-8A-13-8B 0 LR-521 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-141A-5-141 0 Medium Roots MR-1 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-133-4-132 0 MR-2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-137-4-133 0 MR-3 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-210-4-213A 0 MR-4 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-143-4-150 0 MR-5 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 5-38-5-39 0 MR-6 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-78-8-244 0 MR-7 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-78-8-244 0 MR-8 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 5-221-5-219A 0 MR-9 Lift Station 10 Medium Root Problem 2-113-2-112 2 MR-10 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-244-8-243 0 MR-11 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 5-149-5-150 0 MR-12 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 5-217-5-216 0 MR-13 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 5-14813-5-149 0 MR-14 Lift Station 10 Medium Root Problem 2-113-2-112 4 MR-15 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-131-4-100 0 MR-16 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 3-109G-3-109F 0 MR-17 Lift Station 10 Medium Root Problem 2-109-2-108 0 MR-18 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 5-150-5-151 0 MR-19 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-78-8-244 0 MR-20 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-110-4-109 0 MR-21 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 5-150-5-151 0 MR-22 Lift Station 9 Medium Root Problem 5-317-5-316 0 MR-23 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 5-79-5-70 0 MR-24 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 3-120-3N-4 0 MR-25 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-78-8-244 0 MR-26 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-35-7-33B 0 MR-27 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 8-6413-8-64A 0 MR-28 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 8-41-8-42 0 MR-29 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-291A-8-291 0 MR-30 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 MR-31 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-250-8-249 0 MR-32 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-160-12-149 0 MR-33 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-250-8-249 0 MR-34 Metro Medium Root Problem 9-26213-9-262A 0 MR-35 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-265-8-266 0 MR-36 Metro Medium Root Problem 9-262A-9-262 0 Packet Page 537 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description MR-37 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-291-8-283 0 MR-38 Metro Medium Root Problem 9-26213-9-262A 3 MR-39 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-66-8-327 0 MR-40 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-172J-8-172F 0 MR-41 Lift Station 9 Medium Root Problem 5-330E-5-330D 0 MR-42 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-66-8-327 0 MR-43 Metro Medium Root Problem 9-262A-9-262 0 MR-44 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-83-7-84 0 MR-45 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-37-7-36 0 MR-46 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 MR-47 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-78-12-77 0 MR-48 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 MR-49 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 MR-50 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-153-12-150 0 MR-51 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-49-7-49A 0 MR-52 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 MR-53 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-83-7-84 0 MR-54 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-46-7-47 0 MR-55 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 9-111-8-189D 0 MR-56 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 MR-57 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-38-7-36 0 MR-58 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 8-18-8-55 0 MR-59 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-83-7-84 0 MR-60 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-46-7-47 0 MR-61 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-250-12-249 0 MR-62 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-288-12-287 0 MR-63 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 8-73-8-74 0 MR-64 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-185G-12-185F 0 MR-65 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 13-112-13-114 0 MR-66 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-250-12-249 0 MR-67 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-182A-12-215 0 MR-68 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-246-12-243 27 MR-69 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-289-12-288A 0 MR-70 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 9-299-9-298 4 MR-71 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-18813-8-188A 0 MR-72 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 9-299-9-298 0 MR-73 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 9-222A-9-227 0 MR-74 Metro Medium Root Problem 17-44-17-46 0 MR-75 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 9-363A-9-363 0 MR-76 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 9-185-9-186 0 MR-77 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 9-273A-9-273 0 MR-78 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 MR-79 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 MR-80 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-14A-11-14 0 MR-81 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-14A-11-14 0 MR-82 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-195-8-196 0 MR-83 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-10-11-9B 0 MR-84 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-195-8-196 0 MR-85 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-78-7-79 0 MR-86 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-21A-11-21 0 MR-87 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 MR-88 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-33-12-31 0 MR-89 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-9A-13-166A 0 MR-90 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-196-8-196A 0 MR-91 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-203-8-202 0 MR-92 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-8D-13-8C 0 MR-93 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 MR-94 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 MR-95 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 MR-96 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 MR-97 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 MR-98 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 MR-99 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 13-65C-13-65D 0 MR-100 Metro Medium Root Problem 14-56-14-62 0 MR-101 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 MR-102 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 MR-103 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 8-59A-8-59 0 MR-104 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-22A-13-22B 0 MR-105 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-1781-8-178J 0 MR-106 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 8-60-8-59A 0 Packet Page 538 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description MR-107 Metro Medium Root Problem 14-44-14-43 0 MR-108 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-178D-8-178C 0 MR-109 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-40-4-39 0 MR-1 10 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-83-7-84 0 MR-111 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 MR-112 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 7-37-7-36 0 MR-113 Lift Station 3 Medium Root Problem 4-56-4-57 0 MR-114 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-18813-8-188A 0 MR-115 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-74-12-73 0 MR-116 Lift Station 3 Medium Root Problem 4-60-4-62 7 MR-117 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 8-311-8-312 0 MR-118 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 MR-119 Lift Station 10 Medium Root Problem 5-88A-5-88B 0 Roots - General R-1 Lift Station 12 Roots 1-36A-1-36 0 R-2 Lift Station 1 Roots 5-52-5-51 0 R-3 Lynnwood WWTP Roots 5-324A-5N-3 0 R-4 Lift Station 4 Roots 2-90-2-89 0 R-5 Lynnwood WWTP Roots 5-156-5-151 0 R-6 Lynnwood WWTP Roots 2-27-2-25 0 R-7 Lynnwood WWTP Roots 5-14-5-15 0 R-8 Lift Station 1 Roots 5-246-5-245 0 R-9 Edmonds WWTP Roots 8-72-8-73 0 R-10 Edmonds WWTP Roots 8-73-8-74 0 R-11 Lift Station 1 Roots 8-246-8-247 0 R-12 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-270-9-308 0 R-13 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-243-12-241 0 R-14 Metro Roots 9-26213-9-262A 0 R-15 Lift Station 1 Roots 8-18913-8-189A 0 R-16 Lift Station 10 Roots 5-8813-5-88C 0 R-17 Edmonds WWTP Roots 7-49-7-49A 0 R-18 Edmonds WWTP Roots 8-17-8-18 0 R-19 Edmonds WWTP Roots 7-49-7-49A 0 R-20 Edmonds WWTP Roots 7-49-7-49A 0 R-21 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-95-12-94 0 R-22 Edmonds WWTP Roots 8-18-8-55 0 R-23 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-87-12-86 4 R-24 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-87-12-86 0 R-25 Edmonds WWTP Roots 7-79-7-80 0 R-26 Edmonds WWTP Roots 7-83-7-84 0 R-27 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-89-12-88 0 R-28 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-84-12-84A 42 R-29 Edmonds WWTP Roots 7-63-7-62 0 R-30 Edmonds WWTP Roots 8-17-8-18 0 R-31 Edmonds WWTP Roots 8-18-8-55 0 R-32 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-101-12-95 10 R-33 Metro Roots 9-262A-9-262 0 R-34 Metro Roots 9-262A-9-262 0 R-35 Metro Roots 9-262A-9-262 0 R-36 Edmonds WWTP Roots 8-18-8-55 0 R-37 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-246-12-243 0 R-38 Edmonds WWTP Roots 8-43-8-44 0 R-39 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-84A-12-83 49 R-40 Edmonds WWTP Roots 8-43-8-44 0 R-41 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-246-12-243 0 R-42 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-276-9-277 0 R-43 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-363A-9-363 0 R-44 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-289-9-290 0 R-45 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-363A-9-363 0 R-46 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-273C-9-273B 0 R-47 Lift Station 1 Roots 9-117-9-116 0 R-48 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-363A-9-363 0 R-49 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-273-9-274 0 R-50 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-287-9-286 0 R-51 Edmonds WWTP Roots 9-273A-9-273 0 R-52 Lift Station 9 Roots 9-150-5-336 0 R-53 Edmonds WWTP Roots 11-14-11-13 0 R-54 Lift Station 1 Roots 8-193-8-192 0 R-55 Metro Roots 13-8E-13-166A 0 R-56 Metro Roots 13-139-13-142 0 Packet Page 539 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description Ij R-57 Metro Roots 17-55-17-58 0 R-58 Metro Roots 17-24-17-25 0 R-59 Metro Roots 17-57-17-58 0 R-60 Metro Roots 13-22A-13-22B 0 R-61 Edmonds WWTP Roots 15-3A-15-2A 0 R-62 Metro Roots 17-25-17-26 0 R-63 Metro Roots 16-37-16-38 0 Depressions in Pipe DP-1 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 4-132-4-131 0 Camera Under Water DP-2 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 4-163-4-162 8 Camera Under Water DP-3 Lift Station 12 Depressions in Pipe 1-31-1-30 0 Camera Under Water DP-4 Lift Station 3 Depressions in Pipe 4-60-4-62 6 Camera Under Water DP-5 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 4-100-4-100A 9 Camera Under Water DP-6 Lift Station 3 Depressions in Pipe 4-60-4-62 2 Water Level DP-7 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-144-5-145 1 Camera Under Water DP-8 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-42-5-41 0 Water Level DP-9 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-322-5N-2 0 Camera Under Water DP-10 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 4-79-4-78 0 Camera Under Water DP-11 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 3-23-3-24 0 Camera Under Water DP-12 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-321A-5-322 0 Camera Under Water DP-13 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-42-5-41 0 Water Level DP-14 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 4-78-8-244 0 Camera Under Water DP-15 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 4-86-4-85 36 Camera Under Water DP-16 Lift Station 3 Depressions in Pipe 4-70A-4-71-LIFT 0 Camera Under Water DP-17 Lift Station 3 Depressions in Pipe 4-65-4-67 0 Camera Under Water DP-18 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-177-5-176 0 Camera Under Water DP-19 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-325-5N-11 6 Camera Under Water DP-20 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-97-17-96 0 Camera Under Water DP-21 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-7-5-8 0 Camera Under Water DP-22 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-267-5-261 12 Camera Under Water DP-23 Lift Station 12 Depressions in Pipe 3-21-1-3-21 24 Sag DP-24 Lift Station 9 Depressions in Pipe 5-300-5-301 0 Camera Under Water DP-25 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-98-17-97 0 Camera Under Water DP-26 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-7-5-8 0 Camera Under Water DP-27 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-187-5-191 0 Camera Under Water DP-28 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-4-8-5 30 Camera Under Water DP-29 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-96-17-95 0 Camera Under Water DP-30 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-325-5N-11 9 Camera Under Water DP-31 Lift Station 12 Depressions in Pipe 1-43-1-24 0 Camera Under Water DP-32 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 2-47-2-49 0 Camera Under Water DP-33 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-4-8-5 46 Camera Under Water DP-34 Metro Depressions in Pipe 16-101-16-102 3 Sag DP-35 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-267-5-261 11 Camera Under Water DP-36 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-47-7-50 0 Camera Under Water DP-37 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-260-5-344 6 Camera Under Water DP-38 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-267-5-261 6 Camera Under Water DP-39 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-261-5-260 25 Camera Under Water DP-40 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-267-5-261 12 Camera Under Water DP-41 Lift Station 9 Depressions in Pipe 5-283-5-288 0 Camera Under Water DP-42 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 3-8-3-9 0 Camera Under Water DP-43 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-267-5-261 5 Camera Under Water DP-44 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-260-5-344 7 Camera Under Water DP-45 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-260-5-344 5 Camera Under Water DP-46 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-261-5-260 4 Camera Under Water DP-47 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-99-8-316 0 Camera Under Water DP-48 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 3-12-2-2 0 Camera Under Water DP-49 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-261-5-260 39 Camera Under Water DP-50 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-260-5-344 7 Camera Under Water DP-51 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-260-5-344 8 Camera Under Water DP-52 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-182-8-179 10 Camera Under Water DP-53 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-99-8-316 0 Camera Under Water DP-54 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-3-8-4 33 Camera Under Water DP-55 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-4-8-5 97 Camera Under Water DP-56 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-3-8-4 26 Camera Under Water DP-57 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-34-8-35 0 Camera Under Water DP-58 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-3-8-4 5 Camera Under Water DP-59 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-31-8-30 0 Camera Under Water DP-60 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-268-8-267 0 Sag DP-61 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-31-8-30 0 Camera Under Water DP-62 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-37-8-39 0 Camera Under Water Packet Page 540 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description DP-63 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-73-8-74 0 Camera Under Water DP-64 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-49-8-53 0 Camera Under Water DP-65 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-182-8-179 5 Camera Under Water DP-66 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-107-8-106 0 Camera Under Water DP-67 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-167-8-165 0 Camera Under Water DP-68 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-89-8-108 0 Camera Under Water DP-69 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-91-8-106 0 Camera Under Water DP-70 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 5-267-5-261 8 Camera Under Water DP-71 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-147-8-146 0 Camera Under Water DP-72 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-265-8-266 0 Camera Under Water DP-73 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-195A-5-196 0 Camera Under Water DP-74 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-29-8-43 0 Camera Under Water DP-75 Lift Station 9 Depressions in Pipe 5-334A-5-334 0 Camera Under Water DP-76 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-270-9-308 0 Camera Under Water DP-77 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-149A-12-149 0 Camera Under Water DP-78 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-48-7-47 0 Camera Under Water DP-79 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-23-7-53D 0 Camera Under Water DP-80 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-180-12-181 0 Sag DP-81 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-30C-7-30 0 Camera Under Water DP-82 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-50-7-52 0 Camera Under Water DP-83 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-84A-12-83 20 Camera Under Water DP-84 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-84A-12-83 13 Camera Under Water DP-85 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-102-12-101 0 Camera Under Water DP-86 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-133-12-134 0 Camera Under Water DP-87 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-340-8-339 0 Sag DP-88 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-133-12-134 0 Camera Under Water DP-89 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-3-8-4 44 Camera Under Water DP-90 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 11-23A-11-21 0 Camera Under Water DP-91 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-81B-8-81 0 Camera Under Water DP-92 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-185F-12-185A 108 Water Level DP-93 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-49-14-49D 0 Camera Under Water DP-94 Metro Depressions in Pipe 13-4A-13-4 0 Camera Under Water DP-95 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 9-137-9-139 0 Camera Under Water DP-96 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-346-9-347 0 Camera Under Water DP-97 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-120-13-121 11 Sag DP-98 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-133-12-134 0 Camera Under Water DP-99 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-155-8-352 0 Sag DP-100 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-347-9-348 0 Camera Under Water DP-101 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-133-12-134 0 Camera Under Water DP-102 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-204-12-203 0 Sag DP-103 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-189-12-191 0 Camera Under Water DP-104 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 9-100-9-101 0 Camera Under Water DP-105 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-314-9-366 0 Camera Under Water DP-106 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-22213-8-222A 0 Camera Under Water DP-107 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-188-9-189 4 Camera Under Water DP-108 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-319-9-319A 0 Camera Under Water DP-109 Lift Station 9 Depressions in Pipe 5-33413-5-334A 0 Camera Under Water DP-110 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-157-9-156 0 Camera Under Water DP-111 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-159-9-158 0 Camera Under Water DP-112 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-7G-14-7F 26 Camera Under Water DP-1 13 Lift Station 7 Depressions in Pipe 7-9-7-10 0 Water Level DP-114 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-303D-8-303C 0 Camera Under Water DPA 15 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-34-7-30 0 Camera Under Water DPA 16 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-175-9-177 0 Camera Under Water DP-117 Lift Station 9 Depressions in Pipe 5-33413-5-334A 0 Camera Under Water DP-118 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 11-23C-11-21 0 Camera Under Water DP-119 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-321-9-322 0 Camera Under Water DP-120 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-175-9-177 0 Camera Under Water DP-121 Lift Station 7 Depressions in Pipe 7-9-7-10 0 Camera Under Water DP-122 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-289-9-290 0 Water Level DPA 23 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 9-120-9-121 0 Camera Under Water DP-124 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-193-9-196 0 Camera Under Water DP-125 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-364-9-363 8 Camera Under Water DP-126 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-271-9-270 0 Camera Under Water DP-127 Lift Station 7 Depressions in Pipe 7-9-7-10 0 Water Level DP-128 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-364-9-363 13 Camera Under Water DP-129 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-279-9-278 16 Camera Under Water DP-130 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-314-9-366 0 Camera Under Water DP-131 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-224-9-202 0 Camera Under Water DP-132 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 9-55A-9-55 0 Camera Under Water Packet Page 541 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description DP-133 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-20-9-19 0 Camera Under Water DP-134 Metro Depressions in Pipe 10-25-10-26 0 Camera Under Water DP-135 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 11-15-11-14 0 Camera Under Water DP-136 Lift Station 12 Depressions in Pipe 1-36A-1-36 0 Sag DP-137 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 11-9A-7-35 0 Water Level DP-138 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-201-9-202 0 Camera Under Water DP-139 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-52-12-53 0 Camera Under Water DP-140 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-274A-9-274 15 Camera Under Water DP-141 Metro Depressions in Pipe 9-253-9-254 0 Camera Under Water DP-142 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-3-8-4 29 Camera Under Water DP-143 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-3-8-4 44 Camera Under Water DP-144 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-19-9-18 0 Camera Under Water DP-145 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-20-9-19 0 Sag DP-146 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 11-9A-7-35 0 Water Level DP-147 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-202-9-20 0 Camera Under Water DP-148 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-109A-12-111 0 Camera Under Water DP-149 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-61-17-84 0 Camera Under Water DP-150 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-190-12-189 0 Camera Under Water DP-151 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-75-17-78 0 Camera Under Water DP-152 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-37-7-36 16 Camera Under Water DP-153 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-39-17-46 0 Camera Under Water DP-154 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-19-17-23 0 Camera Under Water DP-155 Metro Depressions in Pipe 16-57-16-75 0 Camera Under Water DP-156 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-61-17-84 0 Camera Under Water DP-157 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-87-17-88 0 Camera Under Water DP-158 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-135-12-134 0 Camera Under Water DP-159 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-46-17-47 0 Camera Under Water DP-160 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-61-17-84 0 Camera Under Water DP-161 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-26-12-24 0 Camera Under Water DP-162 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-61-17-84 0 Camera Under Water DP-163 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-34-14-33 0 Camera Under Water DP-164 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-95-17-94 0 Camera Under Water DP-165 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-21-14-4 0 Camera Under Water DP-166 Metro Depressions in Pipe 13-4-14-49 0 Camera Under Water DP-167 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-39-13-37 12 Sag DP-168 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-34-14-33 0 Camera Under Water DP-169 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-23-17-39 4 Camera Under Water DP-170 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-23-17-39 16 Camera Under Water DP-171 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-3E-14-3F 0 Camera Under Water DP-172 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-61-17-84 0 Camera Under Water DPA73 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-36-13-35 5 Sag DP-174 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-59-13-60 9 Sag DP-175 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-66-14-65 0 Camera Under Water DP-176 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-46-14-METER 0 Camera Under Water DP-177 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-35-14-34 0 Camera Under Water DP-178 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-11-14-10 0 Camera Under Water DP-179 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-86-17-87 0 Camera Under Water DP-180 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-48-14-50 0 Camera Under Water DP-181 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-23-17-39 0 Camera Under Water DP-182 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-16-14-11 9 Camera Under Water DP-183 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-85-17-86 0 Camera Under Water DP-184 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-38-14-37 0 Camera Under Water DP-185 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-7A-14-7 0 Camera Under Water DP-186 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-66-14-65 0 Camera Under Water DP-187 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-60-17-61 45 Camera Under Water DP-188 Metro Depressions in Pipe 13-4-14-49 0 Camera Under Water DP-189 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-57-13-59 14 Sag DP-190 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-53-9-212 9 Sag DP-191 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-88-17-89 0 Camera Under Water DP-192 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-23-17-39 23 Camera Under Water DP-193 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-48-17-59 0 Camera Under Water DP-194 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-47-17-48 0 Camera Under Water DP-195 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-38-17-37 4 Camera Under Water DP-196 Lift Station 3 Depressions in Pipe 4-60-4-62 1 Water Level DP-197 Lift Station 9 Depressions in Pipe 5-33413-5-334A 0 Camera Under Water DP-198 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-66-14-65 0 Camera Under Water DP-199 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-69-14-68 0 Camera Under Water DP-200 Lift Station 2 Depressions in Pipe 8-296-8-297 0 Camera Under Water DP-201 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-160-12-149 0 Camera Under Water DP-202 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-67-14-66 0 Camera Under Water Packet Page 542 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description DP-203 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-67-14-66 0 Camera Under Water DP-204 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-61-17-84 0 Camera Under Water DP-205 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-67-14-66 0 Camera Under Water DP-206 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-67-14-66 0 Camera Under Water DP-207 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-61-17-84 0 Camera Under Water DP-208 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-66-14-65 0 Camera Under Water DP-209 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-77-17-78 0 Camera Under Water DP-210 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-32C-7-32D 0 Camera Under Water DP-211 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-65-14-64 0 Camera Under Water DP-212 Metro Depressions in Pipe 13-4-14-49 0 Camera Under Water DP-213 Metro Depressions in Pipe 13-4-14-49 0 Camera Under Water DP-214 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-84-17-85 0 Camera Under Water DP-215 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 3-94-3-93 0 Camera Under Water DP-216 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 3-94-3-93 0 Camera Under Water Problem Joints - Offset General PJ-1 Lift Station 1 Problem Joints - Offset 8-97-8-98 PJ-2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joints - Offset 12-204J-12-2041 PJ-3 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joints - Offset 12-2041-12-204H PJ-4 Lift Station 1 Problem Joints - Offset 9-44-9-43 PJ-5 Lift Station 1 Problem Joints - Offset 8-178A-8-177A roblem Joints - Offset Small PJ-6 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Small 5-281A-5-278 N/A PJ-7 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Small 5-281A-5-278 N/A PJ-8 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Small 4-134-4-133 N/A PJ-9 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-140-3-137 N/A PJ-10 Lift Station 10 Problem Joint - Offset Small 2-112-2-111 N/A PJ-11 Lift Station 10 Problem Joint - Offset Small 2-111-2-110 N/A PJ-12 Lift Station 12 Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-8F-3-8A N/A PJ-13 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-162-3-163 N/A PJ-14 Lift Station 12 Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-12F-3-12E N/A PJ-15 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Small 8-273-8-272 N/A PJ-16 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 13-55-13-56 N/A PJ-17 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 9-23513-9-217 N/A PJ-18 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 9-235A-9-235B N/A PJ-19 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 13-56-13-57 N/A PJ-20 Lift Station 12 Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-121-1-3-121 N/A PJ-21 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Small 4-134-4-133 N/A PJ-22 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Small 5-122-5-121 N/A PJ-23 Lift Station 12 Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-121-1-3-121 N/A PJ-24 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-66E-3-66D N/A PJ-25 Lift Station 12 Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-21-3-2J N/A PJ-26 Lift Station 12 Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-21-3-2J N/A Problem Joints - Offset Medium PJ-27 Lift Station 10 Problem Joint - Offset Medium 4-9-4-7 N/A PJ-28 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Medium 4-140-4-139 N/A PJ-29 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 7-44-7-44A N/A PJ-30 Lift Station 12 Problem Joint - Offset Medium 3-1 D-3-2G N/A PJ-31 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 8-18A-8-18 N/A PJ-32 Lift Station 4 Problem Joint - Offset Medium 2-84-2-83 N/A PJ-33 Lift Station 10 Problem Joint - Offset Medium 2-112-2-111 N/A PJ-34 Lift Station 12 Problem Joint - Offset Medium 3-1 D-3-2G N/A PJ-35 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 8-107-8-106 N/A PJ-36 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 12-266-12-265 N/A PJ-37 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 12-140-12-139 N/A PJ-38 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 13-56-13-57 N/A PJ-39 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Medium 8-185-8-186 N/A PJ-40 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 9-184-9-185 N/A PJ-41 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 8-UNK 1-8-330A N/A PJ-42 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 8-UNK 1-8-330A N/A PJ-43 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Medium 8-178A-8-177A N/A PJ-44 Metro Problem Joint - Offset Medium 16-116-16-98 N/A PJ-45 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 3-60-3-68 N/A Problem Joints - Gaskets Light PJ-46 Lynnwood WWTP Joint Gasket Exposed - Light 3-89-3-72 N/A Light PJ-47 Edmonds WWTP Joint Gasket Exposed - Light 8-54-8-56 N/A Light PJ-48 Edmonds WWTP Joint Gasket Exposed - Light 8-81B-8-81 N/A Light Problem Joints - Gaskets Medium PJ-49 Lynnwood WWTP Joint Gasket Exposed - Medium 3-66E-3-66D N/A Medium PJ-50 Edmonds WWTP lJoint Gasket Exposed - Medium 13-100-13-98 N/A Medium Problem Joints - Gaskets Severe Packet Page 543 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason rJontket Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description PJ-51 Edmonds WWTP Exposed - Severe 12-134-12-132 N/A Severe PJ-52 Metro lJoint Gasket Exposed - Severe 16-59-16-60 N/A Severe Problem Joints - Separation General PJ-53 Lift Station 1 lJoint separated 8-263-8-252 N/A Problem Joints - Separation Small JS-1 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Small 8-39A-8-41 N/A Small JS-2 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Small 8-68-8-68A N/A Small JS-3 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Small 12-207-12-206 N/A Small JS-4 Lift Station 1 Joint separated - Small 8-197-8-199 N/A Small JS-5 Lift Station 1 Joint separated - Small 8-197-8-199 N/A Small JS-6 Metro Joint separated - Small 16-115-16-116 N/A Small Problem Joints - Separation Medium JS-7 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Medium 8-6813-8-68 N/A Medium JS-8 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Medium 12-140-12-139 N/A Medium JS-9 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Medium 12-52-12-53 N/A Medium JS-10 Metro Joint separated - Medium 16-106-16-110 N/A Medium Debris and Deposits D/D-1 Lift Station 3 Debris and Deposits 4-60-4-62 N/A D/D-2 Lift Station 12 Debris and Deposits 1-67-1-66 N/A D/D-3 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-163-4-162 N/A D/D-4 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-100-4-100A N/A D/D-5 Lift Station 12 Debris and Deposits 1-51-1-50 N/A D/D-6 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-39-4-41 N/A D/D-7 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-135-4-136 N/A D/D-8 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-34-4-36 N/A D/D-9 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-98-4-97 N/A D/D-10 Lift Station 3 Debris and Deposits 4-72A-4-72 N/A D/D-11 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-196-4-200 N/A D/D-12 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-83-4-82 N/A D/D-13 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-86-4-85 N/A D/D-14 Lynnwood WWTP Debris and Deposits 2-11-2-10 N/A D/D-15 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-10-12-11 N/A D/D-16 Lift Station 12 Debris and Deposits 1-57-1-56 N/A D/D-17 Lynnwood WWTP Debris and Deposits 3-66E-3-66D N/A D/D-18 Lynnwood WWTP Debris and Deposits 5-164-5-163 N/A D/D-19 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 7-33-7-32 N/A D/D-20 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 8-331-8-330 N/A D/D-21 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 8-73-8-74 N/A D/D-22 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-28-8-2 N/A D/D-23 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 11-18-7-33 N/A D/D-24 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 8-291 B-8-291 A N/A D/D-25 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-160-12-149 N/A D/D-26 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 8-50-8-52 N/A D/D-27 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 9-270-9-308 N/A D/D-28 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 8-1781-8-178J N/A D/D-29 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 8-87-8-86 N/A D/D-30 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 8-172J-8-172F N/A D/D-31 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-177-12-176 N/A D/D-32 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 7-65-7-66 N/A D/D-33 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-98-12-96 N/A D/D-34 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-102-12-101 N/A D/D-35 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 7-39A-7-39B N/A D/D-36 Lift Station 7 Debris and Deposits 7-9-7-10 N/A D/D-37 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-151A-12-151 N/A D/D-38 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-144-12-146 N/A D/D-39 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-292-12-293 N/A D/D-40 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-18OA-12-180 N/A D/D-41 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-289-12-288A N/A D/D-42 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-151A-12-151 N/A D/D-43 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-185D-12-130 N/A D/D-44 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-292-12-293 N/A D/D-45 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 5-239-5-238 N/A D/D-46 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 15-113-15-1C N/A D/D-47 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 9-188-9-189 N/A D/D-48 Lift Station 2 Debris and Deposits 8-298-8-297 N/A D/D-49 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 9-109-8-193 N/A D/D-50 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-100-12-99 N/A D/D-51 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 11-23C-11-21 N/A D/113-52 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 9-272-9-271 N/A D/D-53 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 9-273C-9-273B N/A Packet Page 544 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description D/D-54 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 9-181-9-182 N/A D/D-55 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 9-273-9-274 N/A D/D-56 Metro Debris and Deposits 9-247-9-248 N/A D/D-57 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 9-62-9-61 N/A D/D-58 Metro Debris and Deposits 16-65-16-77 N/A D/D-59 Lift Station 9 Debris and Deposits 9-150-5-336 N/A D/D-60 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 7-37-7-36 N/A D/D-61 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 8-85J-8-85F N/A D/D-62 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-148-12-141 N/A D/D-63 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-140-12-139 N/A D/D-64 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 11-1-11-2 N/A D/D-65 Metro Debris and Deposits 16-82-16-83 N/A D/D-66 Metro Debris and Deposits 17-43-17-42 N/A D/D-67 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-106-12-107 N/A D/D-68 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-52-12-53 N/A D/D-69 Metro Debris and Deposits 17-75-17-78 N/A D/D-70 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 13-47-13-46 N/A D/D-71 Metro Debris and Deposits 17-23-17-39 N/A D/D-72 Metro Debris and Deposits 14-19-14-18 N/A D/D-73 Metro Debris and Deposits 13-2313-9-250 N/A D/D-74 Metro Debris and Deposits 14-35-14-34 N/A D/D-75 Metro Debris and Deposits 16-33-16-36 N/A D/D-76 Metro Debris and Deposits 16-39-16-40 N/A D/D-77 Metro Debris and Deposits 17-23-17-39 N/A D/D-78 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 7-64-7-62 N/A D/D-79 Metro Debris and Deposits 16-95-16-96 N/A D/D-80 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 7-34-7-30 N/A D/D-81 Metro Debris and Deposits 10-4-10-5 N/A D/D-82 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-132-4-131 N/A D/D-83 Lift Station 4 IDebris and Deposits 2-62-2-63 N/A Grease - General G-1 Edmonds WWTP Grease 9-224-9-202 0 G-2 Edmonds WWTP Grease 9-224-9-202 0 Grease - Light G-3 Edmonds WWTP Grease - Light 7-44A-8-331 5 Light G-4 Edmonds WWTP Grease - Light 9-225-9-224 0 Light Grease - Medium G-5 Lift Station 3 Grease - Medium 4-72A-4-72 0 Medium G-6 Lift Station 1 Grease - Medium 4-100-4-100A 12 Medium G-7 Edmonds WWTP Grease - Medium 9-364-9-363 105 Medium G-8 Metro Grease - Medium 10-4-10-5 0 Medium Grease - Severe G-9 Edmonds WWTP Grease - Severe 7-65-7-66 10 Severe Problem Laterals - Abandoned PL-1 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 5-203-5-201 N/A PL-2 Metro Problem Laterals - Abandoned 10-27-10-28 N/A PL-3 Metro Problem Laterals - Abandoned 10-27-10-28 N/A PL-4 Metro Problem Laterals - Abandoned 10-27-10-28 N/A PL-5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-21A-8-51 N/A PL-6 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-76-8-75 N/A PL-7 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-76-8-75 N/A PL-8 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-76-8-75 N/A PL-9 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-10 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-11 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-12 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-13 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-77-8-76 N/A PL-14 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-52-8-59 N/A PL-15 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-16 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-17 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-18 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-19 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-50-8-52 N/A PL-20 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-21 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-77-8-76 N/A PL-22 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-23 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-24 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-50-8-52 N/A PL-25 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-26 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A Packet Page 545 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description PL-27 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-28 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-29 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-30 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-31 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-32 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-52-8-59 N/A PL-33 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-78-8-77 N/A PL-34 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-35 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-78-8-77 N/A PL-36 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-37 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-77-8-76 N/A PL-38 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-77-8-76 N/A PL-39 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-68-8-68A N/A PL-40 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-76-8-75 N/A PL-41 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-77-8-76 N/A PL-42 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-21A-8-51 N/A PL-43 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-44 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-45 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-46 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-68-8-68A N/A PL-47 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-77-8-76 N/A PL-48 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-49 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-52-8-59 N/A PL-50 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-51 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-58-8-57 N/A PL-52 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-77-8-76 N/A PL-53 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-50-8-52 N/A PL-54 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-50-8-52 N/A PL-55 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-68-8-68A N/A PL-56 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 7-37-7-36 N/A PL-57 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-68-8-68A N/A PL-58 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 8-68-8-68A N/A Problem Laterals - Connections PL-59 Lift Station 12 Problem Laterals - Connections 1-39-1-38 N/A Lateral Blocked PL-60 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 5-324-5-324A N/A Connection Damaged PL-61 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-59-8-58 N/A Connection Damaged PL-62 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-50-8-52 N/A Connection Damaged PL-63 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-54-8-56 N/A Connection Damaged PL-64 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-52-8-59 N/A Connection Damaged PL-65 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-58-8-57 N/A Connection Damaged PL-66 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-58-8-57 N/A Connection Damaged PL-67 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-114-8-113 N/A Connection Damaged PL-68 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-50-8-52 N/A Connection Damaged PL-69 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-240-8-239 N/A Connection Damaged PL-70 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-66-8-327 N/A Connection Damaged PL-71 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-90-12-87 N/A Connection Damaged PL-72 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-79-7-80 N/A Connection Damaged PL-73 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-154-12-153 N/A Connection Damaged PL-74 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-65-7-66 N/A Connection Damaged PL-75 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-17-12-18 N/A Connection Damaged PL-76 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-18-8-55 N/A Connection Damaged PL-77 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-156-12-155 N/A Connection Damaged PL-78 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-151A-12-151 N/A Connection Damaged PL-79 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 9-259-9-251 N/A Connection Damaged PL-80 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-144-12-146 N/A Connection Damaged PL-81 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-287-12-286 N/A Connection Damaged PL-82 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-257-8-257A N/A Connection Damaged PL-83 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-150-8-149 N/A Connection Damaged PL-84 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-1-8-1 N/A Connection Damaged PL-85 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-242-9-241 N/A Connection Damaged PL-86 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 16-59-16-60 N/A Connection Damaged PL-87 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-109-12-110 N/A Connection Damaged PL-88 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-148-12-141 N/A Connection Damaged PL-89 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-13-12-14 N/A Connection Damaged PL-90 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-14-12-15 N/A Connection Damaged PL-91 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-137-12-136 N/A Connection Damaged PL-92 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-6-12-5 N/A Connection Damaged PL-93 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-139-12-138 N/A Connection Damaged PL-94 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 11-2-11-7 N/A Connection Damaged PL-95 Lift Station 3 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-58-4-59 N/A Connection Protruding Packet Page 546 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description PL-96 Lift Station 12 Problem Laterals - Connections 1-9-1-9A N/A Connection Protruding PL-97 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-171-4-173A N/A Connection Protruding PL-98 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-74-5-72 N/A Connection Protruding PL-99 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-240B-5-240A N/A Connection Protruding PL-100 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-67-5-66 N/A Connection Protruding PL-101 Lift Station 9 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-309-5-304 N/A Connection Protruding PL-102 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-81-5-80 N/A Connection Protruding PL-103 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-13-4-42 N/A Connection Protruding PL-104 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-87-5-86 N/A Connection Protruding PL-105 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-134-4-133 N/A Connection Protruding PL-106 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-55-5-54 N/A Connection Protruding PL-107 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 5-14-5-15 N/A Connection Protruding PL-108 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-113-5-111 N/A Connection Protruding PL-109 Lift Station 3 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-62-4-63 N/A Connection Protruding PL-110 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-119-4-121 N/A Connection Protruding PL-111 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-137-5-136 N/A Connection Protruding PL-112 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 5-160-5-159 N/A Connection Protruding PL-113 Lift Station 4 Problem Laterals - Connections 2-91-2-90 N/A Connection Protruding PL-114 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 3-157-3-156 N/A Connection Protruding PL-115 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 2-27-2-25 N/A Connection Protruding PL-116 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-131-4-100 N/A Connection Protruding PL-117 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 3-130-3-129 N/A Connection Protruding PL-118 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 2-29-2-28 N/A Connection Protruding PL-119 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-172A-8-172 N/A Connection Protruding PL-120 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-261-5-260 N/A Connection Protruding PL-121 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-239-5-238 N/A Connection Protruding PL-122 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 3-66E-3-66D N/A Connection Protruding PL-123 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-183-8-182 N/A Connection Protruding PL-124 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-53-8-54 N/A Connection Protruding PL-125 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-31-8-30 N/A Connection Protruding PL-126 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-28-8-27 N/A Connection Protruding PL-127 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-257A-8-254 N/A Connection Protruding PL-128 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-35-8-36 N/A Connection Protruding PL-129 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-64-8-63 N/A Connection Protruding PL-130 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-32-8-31 N/A Connection Protruding PL-131 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-269-8-267 N/A Connection Protruding PL-132 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-329A-8-329 N/A Connection Protruding PL-133 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-178-8-177A N/A Connection Protruding PL-134 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-255-8-254 N/A Connection Protruding PL-135 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-58-8-57 N/A Connection Protruding PL-136 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-58-8-57 N/A Connection Protruding PL-137 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-180-8-179 N/A Connection Protruding PL-138 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-112-8-117 N/A Connection Protruding PL-139 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-1-8-1 N/A Connection Protruding PL-140 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-54-8-56 N/A Connection Protruding PL-141 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-87-8-86 N/A Connection Protruding PL-142 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-13-12-14 N/A Connection Protruding PL-143 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 9-109-8-193 N/A Connection Protruding PL-144 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-167-8-165 N/A Connection Protruding PL-145 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-147-12-148 N/A Connection Protruding PL-146 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-285-8-284 N/A Connection Protruding PL-147 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-163-8-162 N/A Connection Protruding PL-148 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-335-8-UNK 1 N/A Connection Protruding PL-149 Lift Station 10 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-88G-5-88E N/A Connection Protruding PL-150 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-122-12-121 N/A Connection Protruding PL-151 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-59-7-57 N/A Connection Protruding PL-152 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-43-7-40 N/A Connection Protruding PL-153 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 9-36-9-37 N/A Connection Protruding PL-154 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-61-7-60 N/A Connection Protruding PL-155 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-79-7-80 N/A Connection Protruding PL-156 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-98-12-96 N/A Connection Protruding PL-157 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-80-7-61 N/A Connection Protruding PL-158 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-94A-12-94 N/A Connection Protruding PL-159 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-87-12-86 N/A Connection Protruding PL-160 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-43-7-40 N/A Connection Protruding PL-161 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-156-12-155 N/A Connection Protruding PL-162 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-34-7-30 N/A Connection Protruding PL-163 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-69-12-67 N/A Connection Protruding PL-164 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-209-12-207 N/A Connection Protruding PL-165 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 15-3C-15-3B N/A Connection Protruding Packet Page 547 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description PL-166 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 13-157-13-156 N/A Connection Protruding PL-167 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-1-8-1 N/A Connection Protruding PL-168 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 9-109-8-193 N/A Connection Protruding PL-169 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-291A-8-291 N/A Connection Protruding PL-170 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-135-5-134 N/A Connection Protruding PL-171 Lift Station 2 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-298-8-297 N/A Connection Protruding PL-172 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-234-9-233 N/A Connection Protruding PL-173 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-56-7-55 N/A Connection Protruding PL-174 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-235-9-235A N/A Connection Protruding PL-175 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 13-166A-13-166 N/A Connection Protruding PL-176 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-287-9-286 N/A Connection Protruding PL-177 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-273-9-274 N/A Connection Protruding PL-178 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-329A-8-329 N/A Connection Protruding PL-179 Lift Station 9 Problem Laterals - Connections 9-150-5-336 N/A Connection Protruding PL-180 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-143-12-142 N/A Connection Protruding PL-181 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-127-12-125 N/A Connection Protruding PL-182 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-129-12-127 N/A Connection Protruding PL-183 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 9-262C-9-262B N/A Connection Protruding PL-184 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-UNK 1-8-330A N/A Connection Protruding PL-185 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-UNK 1-8-330A N/A Connection Protruding PL-186 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-54-12-53 N/A Connection Protruding PL-187 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-47-12-49 N/A Connection Protruding PL-188 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-165-8-164 N/A Connection Protruding PL-189 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 11-7-11-9 N/A Connection Protruding PL-190 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-119-12-117 N/A Connection Protruding PL-191 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-14-12-15 N/A Connection Protruding PL-192 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-121-12-119 N/A Connection Protruding PL-193 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-46-12-46A N/A Connection Protruding PL-194 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-121-12-119 N/A Connection Protruding PL-195 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-123-12-121 N/A Connection Protruding PL-196 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-5-12-2 N/A Connection Protruding PL-197 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-124-12-123 N/A Connection Protruding PL-198 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-111-12-68 N/A Connection Protruding PL-199 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-125-12-123 N/A Connection Protruding PL-200 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-69-7-70 N/A Connection Protruding PL-201 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 13-99-13-98 N/A Connection Protruding PL-202 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-197-8-199 N/A Connection Protruding PL-203 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-203-8-202 N/A Connection Protruding PL-204 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 16-37-16-38 N/A Connection Protruding PL-205 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 14-34-14-33 N/A Connection Protruding PL-206 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 13-56-13-57 N/A Connection Protruding PL-207 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 14-7L-14-7B N/A Connection Protruding PL-208 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-178-8-177A N/A Connection Protruding PL-209 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 13-166A-13-166 N/A Connection Protruding PL-210 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 13-87-13-88 N/A Connection Protruding PL-211 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 14-29-14-28 N/A Connection Protruding PL-212 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 13-81A-13-81B N/A Connection Protruding PL-213 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 13-146-13-145 N/A Connection Protruding PL-214 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 14-47-14-48 N/A Connection Protruding PL-215 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 10-6-10-5 N/A Connection Protruding PL-216 Lift Station 3 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-60-4-62 N/A Connection Protruding PL-217 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-30-4-28 N/A Connection Protruding PL-218 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-196-4-200 N/A Connection Protruding PL-219 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 16-106-16-110 N/A Connection Protruding PL-220 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 16-99-16-102 N/A Connection Protruding PL-221 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 14-70-14-69 N/A Connection Protruding PL-222 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 5-152-5-151 N/A Connection Protruding PL-223 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-61-7-60 N/A Connection Protruding PL-224 Lift Station 2 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-298-8-297 N/A Connection Protruding PL-225 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-261-5-260 N/A Connection Protruding PL-226 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-56-7-55 N/A Connection Protruding PL-227 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-76-8-75 N/A Lateral Blocked PL-228 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-55-8-55A N/A Lateral Blocked PL-229 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-266-9-267 N/A Lateral Blocked PL-230 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-160-8-159 N/A Lateral Blocked PL-231 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-303-8-303A N/A Lateral Blocked PL-232 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-55A-8-57 N/A Lateral Blocked PL-233 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-105B-12-105 N/A Lateral Blocked PL-234 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-347-9-348 N/A Lateral Blocked PL-235 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-155-8-352 N/A Lateral Blocked Packet Page 548 of 895 Table F.2 Granite O&M No. Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run (ft) Pipe Type Sheet No. Other Description PL-236 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-257-8-257A N/A Lateral Blocked PL-237 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-11-9-10 N/A Lateral Blocked PL-238 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 11-6-11-5 N/A Lateral Blocked PL-239 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-269-8-267 N/A TV from other end PL-240 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-178-8-177A N/A TV from other end PL-241 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-180-8-179 N/A TV from other end PL-242 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-43-7-40 N/A TV from other end PL-243 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-61-7-60 N/A TV from other end PL-244 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-79-7-80 N/A TV from other end PL-245 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 13-81A-13-81B N/A TV from other end PL-246 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 14-7L-14-7B N/A TV from other end PL-247 Lift Station 4 Problem Laterals - Connections 2-131-2-132 N/A PL-248 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-UNK 1-8-330A I N/A Packet Page 549 of 895 Table F.3 Granite Known Deficiencies - Trenchless Repair Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments CIP No. Roots - Heavy ROOTS HR-1 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 4-141-4-142 0 ROOTS HR-2 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 5-30-5-28 0 ROOTS HR-3 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 4-196-4-200 0 ROOTS HR-4 Lift Station 10 Heavy Root Problem 2-113A-2-113 0 ROOTS HR-5 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 4-144-4-145 0 ROOTS HR-6 Lift Station 10 Heavy Root Problem 2-112-2-111 0 ROOTS HR-7 Lynnwood WWTP Heavy Root Problem 5-14813-5-149 0 ROOTS HR-8 Lift Station 10 Heavy Root Problem 2-113E-2-113 1 ROOTS HR-9 Lynnwood WWTP Heavy Root Problem 3-109H-3-109G 0 ROOTS HR-10 Lynnwood WWTP Heavy Root Problem 3-84A-3-85 0 ROOTS HR-11 Lynnwood WWTP Heavy Root Problem 3-103-3-105 0 ROOTS HR-12 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 5-37-5-38 0 ROOTS HR-13 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 ROOTS HR-14 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 ROOTS HR-15 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 8-78-8-77 0 ROOTS HR-16 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 8-249-8-265 0 ROOTS HR-17 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-159-12-160 0 ROOTS HR-18 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 8-1781-8-178J 0 ROOTS HR-19 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-243-12-241 0 ROOTS HR-20 Metro Heavy Root Problem 16-25-16-26 0 ROOTS HR-21 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 ROOTS HR-22 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 7-49-7-49A 0 ROOTS HR-23 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-105B-12-105A 0 ROOTS HR-24 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12N-79-13-65B 0 ROOTS HR-25 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 8-136-8-137 0 ROOTS HR-26 Metro Heavy Root Problem 14-19-14-18 0 ROOTS HR-27 Metro Heavy Root Problem 13-113-13-112 0 ROOTS HR-28 Metro Heavy Root Problem 13-113-13-112 0 ROOTS HR-29 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-246-12-243 0 ROOTS HR-30 Lift Station 9 Heavy Root Problem 9-341-9-340A 0 ROOTS HR-31 Lift Station 9 Heavy Root Problem 9-342-9-341 0 ROOTS HR-32 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-289-12-288A 0 ROOTS HR-33 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-293-12-293A 0 ROOTS HR-34 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 5-135-5-134 0 ROOTS HR-35 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 8-175-8-174 0 ROOTS HR-36 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 15-1B-15-1C 0 ROOTS HR-37 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 15-313-15-3A 0 ROOTS HR-38 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 8-207-8-206 0 ROOTS HR-39 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 9-299-9-298 0 ROOTS HR-40 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 9-276-9-277 0 ROOTS HR-41 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 9-363A-9-363 0 ROOTS HR-42 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 9-363A-9-363 0 ROOTS HR-43 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 9-363A-9-363 0 ROOTS HR-44 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 8-85K-8-85F 0 ROOTS HR-45 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 9-363A-9-363 0 ROOTS HR-46 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 9-225-9-224 0 ROOTS HR-47 Metro Heavy Root Problem 10-19-10-19B 0 ROOTS HR-48 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 ROOTS HR-49 Metro Heavy Root Problem 13-8E-13-166A 0 ROOTS HR-50 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 8-85K-8-85F 0 ROOTS HR-51 Metro Heavy Root Problem 13-21A-13-21 0 ROOTS HR-52 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 13-63B-13-63C 0 ROOTS HR-53 Metro Heavy Root Problem 14-56-14-62 0 ROOTS HR-54 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 Problem Joints - Infiltration PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-54 Edmonds WWTP Infiltration in the Joint 8-72-8-73 N/A Light PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-55 Lift Station 1 Infiltration in the Joint 9-170-9-172 N/A Light PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-56 Lift Station 1 Infiltration in the Joint 9-136-9-136A N/A Medium Problem Joints - Joint Separation - Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-57 Lift Station 10 Joint separated - Large 4-3-2-113B N/A PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-58 Lynnwood WWTP Joint separated - Large 3-66E-3-66D N/A PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-59 Lift Station 1 Joint separated - Large 8-346-8-343 N/A PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-60 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Large 8-2D-8-2B N/A PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-61 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Large 8-2D-8-2B N/A Breach - Crack, Circular Narrow BREACH B-1 Lift Station 3 Crack 4-52-4-52A 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-2 Lynnwood WWTP Crack 3-109B-3-109A 0 Circular -Narrow BREACH B-3 Lynnwood WWTP Crack 3-1H-3-3A2 0 Circular -Narrow BREACH B-4 Lynnwood WWTP Crack 5-319-5-320 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-5 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-287-8-286 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-6 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-58-8-57 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-7 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-332-8-331 1 Circular- Narrow Packet Page 550 of 895 Table F.3 Granite Known Deficiencies - Trenchless Repair Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments CIP No. BREACH B-8 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-50-8-52 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-9 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-107-8-106 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-10 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-16-12-17 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-11 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-287-8-286 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-12 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-243-8-242 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-13 Lift Station 1 Crack 7-77-7-76 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-14 Lift Station 1 Crack 7-77-7-76 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-15 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-243-8-242 1 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-16 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-84A-12-83 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-17 Lift Station 1 Crack 7-76-7-75 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-18 Edmonds WWTP Crack 9-274-9-275 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-19 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-178A-8-177A 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-20 Edmonds WWTP Crack 9-225-9-224 1 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-21 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-22 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-1A-7-39A 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-23 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-109-12-110 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-24 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-1-11-2 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-25 Metro Crack 13-22-13-22A 0 Circular -Narrow BREACH B-26 Edmonds WWTP Crack 13-53-9-212 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-27 Edmonds WWTP Crack 13-53-9-212 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-28 Edmonds WWTP Crack 13-53-9-212 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-29 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-3-11-2 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-30 Edmonds WWTP Crack 13-53-9-212 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-31 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-303B-8-303D 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-32 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-303B-8-303D 0 Circular - Narrow BREACH B-33 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-34-7-30 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-34 Metro Crack 16-103-16-106 1 Circular -Narrow BREACH B-35 Lift Station 4 Crack 2-91-2-90 0 Circular- Narrow BREACH B-36 Lift Station 1 Crack 4-124-4-123 0 Circular - Wider BREACH B-37 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-98-8-99 0 Circular - Wider Breach - Crack, Longitudinal Narrow BREACH B-38 Lift Station 1 Crack 4-217A-4-217 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-39 Lynnwood WWTP Crack 5-221-5-219A 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-40 Lift Station 1 Crack 5-260-5-344 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-41 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-58-8-57 5 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-42 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-285-8-284 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-43 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-76-8-75 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-44 Lift Station 1 Crack 5-261-5-260 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-45 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-332-8-331 7 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-46 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-332-8-331 2 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-47 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-50-8-52 8 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-48 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-331-8-330 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-49 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-75-8-57 2 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-50 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-77-8-76 2 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-51 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-58-8-57 3 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-52 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-58-8-57 12 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-53 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-101A-8-100 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-54 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-98-8-99 2 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-55 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-51-8-50 7 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-56 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-50-8-52 13 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-57 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-58-8-57 2 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-58 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-107-8-106 2 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-59 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-97-8-98 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-60 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-281-8-282 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-61 Edmonds WWTP Crack 9-264-9-266 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-62 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-285-8-284 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-63 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-95-12-94 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-64 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-134-12-132 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-65 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-93-12-90 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-66 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-72-12-71 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-67 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-35-7-33B 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-68 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-93-12-90 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-69 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-79-7-80 5 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-70 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-79-7-80 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-71 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-65-7-66 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-72 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-75-8-57 2 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-73 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-226-12-225 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-74 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-75-8-57 2 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-75 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-71-12-89 3 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-76 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-51-8-11 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-77 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-206-8-205 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-78 Metro Crack 17-31-17-28 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-79 Lift Station 9 Crack 9-326-9-327 1 Longitudinal - Narrow Packet Page 551 of 895 Table F.3 Granite Known Deficiencies - Trenchless Repair Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments CIP No. BREACH B-80 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-8-11-7 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-81 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-126-12-125 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-82 Edmonds WWTP Crack 9-224-9-202 7 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-83 Edmonds WWTP Crack 9-224-9-202 2 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-84 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-128-12-127 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-85 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-8-12-6 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-86 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-37-12-38 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-87 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-37-7-36 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-88 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-89 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 1 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-90 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-139-12-138 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-91 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-55-12-56 0 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-92 Edmonds WWTP Crack 13-65C-13-65D 8 Longitudinal - Narrow BREACH B-93 Metro Crack 13-22-13-22A 1 Longitudinal - Narrow Breach - Crack, Longitudinal Wider BREACH B-94 Lift Station 4 Crack 2-83-2-82 0 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-95 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-58-8-57 5 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-96 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-30-8-29 0 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-97 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-240-8-239 1 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-98 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-112-8-117 1 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-99 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-46-7-47 0 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-100 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-135-8-136 0 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-101 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-38-7-36 0 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-102 Metro Crack 17-78-17-82 0 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-103 Metro Crack 13-20-13-15 0 Longitudinal - Wider BREACH B-104 Metro Crack 16-9-16-8 1 Longitudinal - Wider Breach - Crack, Multiple Narrow BREACH B-105 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-59-8-58 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-106 Lift Station 1 Crack 5-263-5-262 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-107 Lift Station 9 Crack 5-299-5-300 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-108 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-59-8-58 18 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-109 Lynnwood WWTP Crack 2-29-2-28 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-110 Lynnwood WWTP Crack 3-131-3-132 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-111 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-219H-8-219G 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-112 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-332-8-331 4 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-113 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-75-8-57 2 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-114 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-75-8-57 12 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-115 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-285-8-284 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-116 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-286-8-285 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-117 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-280-8-281 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-118 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-185D-12-130 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-119 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-280-8-281 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-120 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-185D-12-130 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-121 Lift Station 1 Crack 7-75-7-74 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-122 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-79-7-80 5 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-123 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-50-7-52 20 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-124 Edmonds WWTP Crack 7-50-7-52 5 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-125 Metro Crack 9-262A-9-262 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-126 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-132-12-131 2 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-127 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-249-12-248 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-128 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-74-8-75 4 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-129 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-107-12-108 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-130 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-248-12-247 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-131 Lift Station 7 Crack 7-9-7-10 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-132 Lift Station 1 Crack 9-117-9-116 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-133 Edmonds WWTP Crack 9-273A-9-273 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-134 Lift Station 9 Crack 9-150-5-336 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-135 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-8-11-7 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-136 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-128-12-127 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-137 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-196-12-198 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-138 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-139 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-126-12-125 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-140 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-106-12-107 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-141 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-109-12-110 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-142 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-24-12-23 2 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-143 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-144 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-126-12-125 1 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-145 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-109-12-110 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-146 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-107-12-108 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-147 Lift Station 1 Crack 9-59-9-60 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-148 Edmonds WWTP Crack 13-65C-13-65D 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-149 Metro Crack 14-66-14-65 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-150 Metro Crack 10-10-10-7 1 Multiple - Narrow Packet Page 552 of 895 Table F.3 Granite Known Deficiencies - Trenchless Repair Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments CIP No. BREACH B-151 Metro Crack 14-66-14-65 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-152 Metro Crack 17-63-17-64 0 Multiple - Narrow BREACH B-153 Edmonds WWTP Crack 13-53-9-212 0 Multiple - Narrow Breach - Crack, Multiple Wider BREACH B-154 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-75-8-57 1 Multiple - Wider BREACH B-155 Lift Station 1 Crack 7-76-7-75 5 Multiple - Wider BREACH B-156 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-101-12-95 2 Multiple - Wider BREACH B-157 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-109-12-110 0 Multiple - Wider BREACH B-158 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-106-12-107 0 Multiple - Wider Breach - Crack, Spiral Narrow BREACH B-159 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-97-8-98 0 Spiral - Narrow BREACH B-160 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-189-8-194 0 Spiral - Narrow BREACH B-161 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-8-11-7 0 Spiral - Narrow BREACH B-162 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-8-11-7 0 Spiral - Narrow Breach - Crack General BREACH B-163 Lift Station 12 Crack 1-31-1-30 0 BREACH B-164 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-240-8-239 0 Breach - Hole in Pipe BREACH B-165 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe 11-4-11-3 0 BREACH B-166 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe 11-6-11-5 0 Breach - Hole in Pipe Small BREACH B-167 Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 4-186-4-185 0 SMALL BREACH B-168 Lift Station 4 Hole in Pipe - Small 2-89-2-88 0 SMALL BREACH B-169 Lift Station 10 Hole in Pipe - Small 2-113A-2-113 0 SMALL BREACH B-170 Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 5-269-5-267 0 SMALL BREACH B-171 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small 8-68-8-68A 0 SMALL BREACH B-172 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small 8-75-8-57 0 SMALL BREACH B-173 Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 8-202-8-201 0 SMALL BREACH B-174 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small INLET-7-61 0 SMALL BREACH B-175 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small 12-248-12-247 0 SMALL BREACH B-176 Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 9-80A-9-80 0 SMALL BREACH B-177 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small 8-6813-8-68 0 SMALL BREACH B-178 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small 12-49-12-50 0 SMALL BREACH B-179 Metro Hole in Pipe - Small 14-29-14-28 0 SMALL BREACH B-180 Metro Hole in Pipe - Small 13-22-13-22A 0 SMALL BREACH B-181 Metro Hole in Pipe - Small 10-6-10-5 0 SMALL BREACH B-182 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small 12-200-12-112 0 SMALL Breach - Hole in Pipe Medium BREACH B-183 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Medium 8-6813-8-68 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-184 Lift Station 7 Hole in Pipe - Medium 7-9-7-10 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-185 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Medium 8-71-8-72 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-186 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Medium 12-134-12-132 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-187 Metro Hole in Pipe - Medium 10-3-10-4 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-188 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Medium 12-132-12-131 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-189 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Medium 9-301-9-300 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-190 Lift Station 12 Hole in Pipe - Medium 1-16-1-20 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-191 Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Medium 8-245A-8-245 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-192 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Medium 8-59A-8-59 0 MEDIUM BREACH B-193 Metro Hole in Pipe - Medium 14-3-14-3A 0 MEDIUM Packet Page 553 of 895 Table F.4 Composite Capital Improvement Projects Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Miscellaneous Meters SE Corner of Hwy 99 and 224th St Clean Flume 14 F.1 Miscellaneous Meters 22304 Hwy 99 Clean Flume 14 F.1 Miscellaneous Meters Edmonds Way Robinhood Lanes Brush Sensor 15 F.1 Miscellaneous Meters 244th and Hwy 99 - NW Corner Clean Flume 16 F.1 Miscellaneous Meters Denny's on SR 104 and Hwy 99 Clean Flume 17 F.1 Miscellaneous Meters Old Ballinger Pump Station Clean Flume 17 F.1 Miscellaneous Meters East Side, NE Corner of Ballinger PS Clean Flume 17 F.1 Miscellaneous Meters Ballinger Golf Course at 74th Ave Clean Flume 17 F.1 BREACH B-150 Metro Crack 10-10-10-7 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 ROOTS HR-47 Metro Heavy Root Problem 10-19-10-19B 0 F.2 7122 210th Street Grease 10-23-10-25 283 Conc F.1 Metro Depressions in Pipe 10-25-10-26 0 F.1 Camera Unc Metro Problem Laterals - Abandoned 10-27-10-28 N/A F.1 Metro Problem Laterals - Abandoned 10-27-10-28 N/A F.1 Metro Problem Laterals - Abandoned 10-27-10-28 N/A F.1 SUM of Reach 10-27-10-29 BREACH B-187 Metro Hole in Pipe - Medium 10-3-10-4 0 MEDIUM F.2 Metro Debris and Deposits 10-4-10-5 F.1 Metro Grease - Medium 10-4-10-5 0 Medium F.1 SUM of Reach 10-4-10-5 BREACH B-181 Metro Hole in Pipe - Small 10-6-10-5 0 SMALL F.2 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 10-6-10-5 F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 10-6-10-5 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-10-11-9B 0 F.1 BREACH B-24 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-1-11-2 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 11-1-11-2 N/A F.1 SUM of Reach 11-1-11-2 BREACH B-194 Lift Station 12 Deformed 1-11-1-15 0 F.3 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-12-11-11 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-12-11-11 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-12-11-11 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 11-12-11-11 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-14-11-13 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Roots 11-14-11-13 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 11-14-11-13 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-14A-11-14 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-14A-11-14 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 11-14A-11-14 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 11-15-11-14 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 11-18-7-33 N/A F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-19-11-18 0 F.1 BREACH B-22 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-1A-7-39A 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 11-2-11-7 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-21A-11-21 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-21A-11-21 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-21A-11-21 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-21A-11-21 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 11-21A-11-21 BREACH B-201 Edmonds WWTP Broken 11-23A-11-21 0 F.3 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-23A-11-21 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pie 11-23A-11-21 0 F.1 Camera Unc SUM of Reach 11-23A-11-21 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-23B-11-21 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-23B-11-21 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 11-2313-11-21 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 11-23C-11-21 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 11-23C-11-21 N/A F.1 SUM of Reach 11-23C-11-21 BREACH B-29 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-3-11-2 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-165 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe 11-4-11-3 0 F.2 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-5-11-3 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-5-11-3 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-5-11-3 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-5-11-3 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 11-5-11-3 BREACH B-166 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe 11-6-11-5 0 F.2 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-6-11-5 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 11-6-11-5 N/A F.1 1 Lateral Blocl SUM of Reach 11-6-11-5 BREACH B-190 Lift Station 12 Hole in Pipe - Medium 1-16-1-20 0 MEDIUM F.2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 11-7-11-9 N/A F.1 Connection I ROOTS HR-48 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.2 ROOTS HR-54 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.2 BREACH B-80 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-8-11-7 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-135 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-8-11-7 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-161 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-8-11-7 0 ISpiral - Narrow F.2 Packet Page 554 of 895 Table FA Composite Capital Improvement Projects Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. is BREACH B-162 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-8-11-7 0 Spiral - Narrow F.2 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 11-8-11-7 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 11-8-11-7 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-9A-7-35 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-9A-7-35 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-9A-7-35 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 11-9A-7-35 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 11-9A-7-35 0 F.1 Water Level Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pie 11-9A-7-35 0 F.1 Water Level SUM of Reach 11-9A-7-35 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-100-12-99 N/A Mill F.1 BREACH B-156 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-101-12-95 2 Multiple - Wider F.2 BREACH B-206 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 12-101-12-95 0 F.3 PIPE REPAIR PR-19 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-101-12-95 1 F.3 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-101-12-95 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-101-12-95 10 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-101-12-95 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-10-12-11 N/A F.1 BREACH 199 Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-102-12-101 0 F.3 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-102-12-101 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-102-12-101 N/A F.1 SUM of Reach 12-102-12-101 ROOTS HR-23 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-10513-12-105A 0 F.2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-10513-12-105A N/A F.1 Lateral Blocl SUM of Reach 12-10513-12-105A BREACH B-216 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Large 12-105M-12-105K 1 F.3 PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-75 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 12-105N-12-105M N/A Large F.3 PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-76 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 12-105N-12-105M N/A Large F.3 SUM of Reach 12-105N-12-105M BREACH B-140 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-106-12-107 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-158 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-106-12-107 0 Multiple - Wider F.2 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-106-12-107 N/A F. SUM of Reach 12-106-12-107 BREACH B-129 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-107-12-108 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-146 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-107-12-108 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 SUM of Reach 12-107-12-108 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-108-12-109 0 BREACH B-23 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-109-12-110 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-141 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-109-12-110 0 Multiple -Narrow F.2 BREACH B-145 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-109-12-110 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-157 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-109-12-110 0 1 Multiple - Wider F.2 Edm s WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-109-12-110 F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-109-12-110 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-109A-12-111 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-111-12-68 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-119-12-117 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-121-12-119 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-121-12-119 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-121-12-119 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-12-12-13 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-122-12-121 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-123-12-121 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-123-12-121 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-124-12-123 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-125-12-123 N/A F.1 Connection I BREACH B-81 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-126-12-125 1 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-139 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-126-12-125 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-144 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-126-12-125 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 SUM of Reach 12-126-12-125 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-12742-125 N/A F.1 Connection I BREACH B-84 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-128-12-127 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-136 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-128-12-127 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 SUM of Reach 12-128-12-127 Edmonds WWTP roblem Laterals - Connections 12-129-12-127 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-13-12-14 N/A J F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-13-12-14 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-13-12-14 BREACH B-126 Edmonds WWTP ICrack 12-132-12-131 2 Multiple - Narrow F.2 Packet Page 555 of 895 Table FA Composite Capital Improvement Projects Problem Category Identifier Location Reason idW Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. BREACH B-188 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Medium 12-132-12-131 0 MEDIUM F.2 SUM of Reach 12-132-12-131 BREACH B-214 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Large 12-133-12-134 0 F.3 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-133-12-134 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-133-12-134 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-133-12-134 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pie 12-133-12-134 0 F.1 Camera Unc SUM of Reach 12-133-12-134 BREACH B-64 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-134-12-132 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-186 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe- Medium 12-134-12-132 0 MEDIUM F.2 Edmonds WWTP Joint Gasket Exposed - Severe 12-134-12-132 N/A F.1 Severe SUM of Reach 12-134-12-132 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-135-12-134 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-135-12-134 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pie 12-135-12-134 0 F.1 Camera Unc SUM of Reach 12-135-12-134 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-137-12-136 N/A F.1 Connection I BREACH B-90 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-139-12-138 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-139-12-138 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-139-12-138 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 12-140-12-139 N/A F.1 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Medium 12-140-12-139 N/A F.1 Medium Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-140-12-139 N/A F.1 SUM of Reach 12-140-12-139 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-14-12-15 NIA F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP m Laterals - Connections 12-14-12-1 Connection 1 SUM of Reach 12-14-12-15 BREACH B-21 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 0 Circular- Narrow F.2 BREACH B-88 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-89 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 1 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-138 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-143 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-143-12-142 1 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-143-12-142 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-143-12-142 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-144-12-146 N/A F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-144-12-146 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-144-12-146 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-147-12-148 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-148-12-141 N/A F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-148-12-141 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-148-12-141 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-149A-12-149 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-151-12-22 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-151A-12-151 N/A F.1 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-151A-12-151 N/A F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-151A-12-151 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-151A-12-151 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-153-12-150 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-154-12-153 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-156-12-155 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-156-12-155 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-156-12-155 9223 216th Street Black Water 12-156-13-96 380 Conc F.1 ROOTS HR-17 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-159-12-160 0 F.2 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-160-12-149 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-160-12-149 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-160-12-149 N/A F.1 SUM of Reach 12-160-12-149 BREACH B-10 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-16-12-17 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 3 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-16-12-17 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-16-12-17 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-163-12-162 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-165-12-164 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-17-12-18 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-175-12-146 0 F.1 Packet Page 556 of 895 Table F.4 Composite Capital Improvement Projects Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. SUM of Reach 12-175-12-146 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-177-12-176 N/A F.1 BREACH B-210 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 12-178-12-179 0 F.3 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-180-12-181 0 F.1 Sag Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-180A-12-180 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-180A-12-180 N/A F.1 SUM of Reach 12-180A-12-180 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-1-8-1 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-1-8-1 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-1-8-1 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-1-8-1 N/A F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-1-8-1 PIPE REPAIR PR-12 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-181-12-182 0 F.3 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-18-12-19 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-182A-12-215 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-182A-12-215 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-182A-12-215 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-182A-12-215 BREACH B-118 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-185D-12-130 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-120 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-185D-12-130 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-185D-12-130 N/A F.1 SUM of Reach 12-185D-12-130 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-185F-12-185A 108 F.1 Water Level Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-185G-12-185F 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-185G-12-185F 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-185G-12-185F 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-185G-12-185F 1153 8th Ave S. Grit, Black Water 12-189-12-190 c/o 120 Conc F.1 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-189-12-191 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-190-12-189 0 F.1 Camera Unc 1115 8th Ave S. Grit, Black Water 12-191-12-189 285 Conc F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-19-12-28 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-19-12-28 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-19-12-28 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-19-12-28 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-19-12-28 Black Water 200 F.1 BREACH B-137 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-196-12-198 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-182 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small 12-200-12-112 0 SMALL F.2 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-204-12-203 0 F.1 Sag Edmonds WWTP Problem Joints - Offset 12-2041-12-204H F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joints - Offset 12-204J-12-2041 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Small 12-207-12-206 N/A F.1 Small Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-208-12-207 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-208-12-207 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-209-12-207 N/A F.1 Connection I Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-2-12-1 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-2-12-1 BREACH B-200 Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-212-12-211 0 F.3 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-217-12-216 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-22-12-20 0 F.1 BREACH B-73 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-226-12-225 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-226-12-225 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-226-12-225 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-23413-12-234A 0 L F.1 BREACH B-142 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-24-12-23 2 Multiple - Narrow F.2 ROOTS HR-19 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-243-12-241 0 F.2 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-243-12-241 0 FA Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-243-12-241 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-243-12-241 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-243-12-241 ROOTS HR-29 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-246-12-243 0 F.2 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-246-12-243 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-246-12-243 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-246-12-243 27 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-246-12-243 0 F.1 Packet Page 557 of 895 Table FA Composite Capital Improvement Projects Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Edmonds WWTP 0 SUM of Reach 12-246-12-243 BREACH B-130 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-248-12-247 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 BREACH B-175 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small 12-248-12-247 0 SMALL F.2 SUM of Reach 12-248-12-247 BREACH B-127 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-249-12-248 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-250-12-249 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-250-12-249 0 F.1 SUM of Reach 12-250-12-249 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-26-12-24 0 F.1 Camera Unc Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 12-266-12-265 NIA F.1 BREACH B-217 Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-269C-12-269D 0 Soil Visible- Large F.3 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-284F-12-284 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-287-12-286 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-287-12-286 NIA F.1 Connection I SUM of Reach 12-287-12-286 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-288-12-287 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 0 F.1 Edmonds WWTP I Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 1 0 1 1 F.1 Ldmonds WW I F' Light Root Problem 1Z-Z8-8-2 U F.1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-28-8-2 1 0 1 F.1 Packet Page 558 of 895 Table F.4 Granite Known Deficiencies - Dig up and Replace Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments CIP No. Problem Joints - Offset Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-62 Lift Station 1 Joint Offset - Large 5-122-5-121 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-63 Lift Station 3 Joint Offset - Large 4-52A-4-53 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-64 Lift Station 1 Joint Offset - Large 5-42-5-41 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-65 Lift Station 3 Joint Offset - Large 4-52A-4-53 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-66 Lynnwood WWTP Joint Offset - Large 3-66E-3-66D N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-67 Lynnwood WWTP Joint Offset - Large 3-66A-3-66 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-68 Lift Station 7 Joint Offset - Large 7-11-7-7 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-69 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 8-107-8-106 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-70 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 8-107-8-106 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-71 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 12-51-8-11 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-72 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 9-349-9-350 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-73 Lift Station 1 Joint Offset - Large 8-175-8-174 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-74 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 9-181-9-182 N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-75 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 12-105N-12-105M N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-76 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 12-105N-12-105M N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-77 Metro Joint Offset - Large 14-3-14-3A N/A Large PROBLEM JOINTS PJ-78 Lift Station 1 Joint Offset - Large 5-122-5-121 N/A Large Breach - Deformed BREACH B-194 Lift Station 12 Deformed 1-11-1-15 0 Breach Broken General BREACH B-195 Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-50-8-52 0 BREACH B-196 Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-54-8-56 0 BREACH B-197 Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-78-8-77 0 BREACH B-198 Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-29-8-43 0 BREACH B-199 Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-102-12-101 0 BREACH B-200 Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-212-12-211 0 BREACH B-201 Edmonds WWTP Broken 11-23A-11-21 0 BREACH B-202 Metro Broken 13-14-13-13 0 BREACH B-203 Metro Broken 14-7G-14-7F 0 Breach - Broken Hole BREACH B-204 Lift Station 3 Broken Hole 4-75-4-74 0 BREACH B-205 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 7-39C-7-40 0 BREACH B-206 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 12-101-12-95 0 BREACH B-207 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 8-17-8-18 0 BREACH B-208 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 12N-79-13-65B 0 BREACH B-209 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 12-75-8-14 0 BREACH B-210 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 12-178-12-179 0 BREACH B-211 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 12-75-8-14 0 BREACH B-212 Lift Station 1 Broken Hole 9-59-9-60 0 Breach - Broken Hole Large BREACH B-213 Lift Station 4 Hole in Pipe - Large 2-64B-2-68 0 BREACH B-214 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Large 12-133-12-134 0 BREACH B-215 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Large 12-49-12-50 0 BREACH B-216 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Large 12-105M-12-105K 1 Breach - Broken Soil Visable Large BREACH I B-217 lEdmondsWWTP Broken 12-269C-12-269D 0 Soil Visible - Large BREACH I B-218 I Metro Broken 14-28-14-27 0 Soil Visible - Large Breach - Broken Soil Visable Medium BREACH B-219 I Lift Station 1 Broken 4-115-8-219H 0 Soil Visible - Medium BREACH B-220 Lynnwood WWTP Broken 2-29-2-28 0 Soil Visible - Medium BREACH B-221 Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-22-8-21 0 Soil Visible - Medium BREACH B-222 Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-337-8-336A 0 Soil Visible - Medium BREACH B-223 Lift Station 1 Broken 5-246-5-245 0 Soil Visible - Medium Breach - Broken Soil Visable Small BREACH B-224 Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-50-8-52 0 Soil Visible - Small BREACH B-225 Edmonds WWTP Broken 15-4E-15-4C 0 Soil Visible - Small Breach - Broken Void Visable Medium BREACH I B-226 ILiftStationl Broken 8-162-8-161 0 Void Visible -Medium BREACH I B-227 Lift Station 1 Broken 8-351-8-350 0 Void Visible -Medium Breach - Broken Void Visable Small BREACH B-228 I Edmonds WWTP Broken 7-35-7-33B 0 Void Visible - Small BREACH B-229 Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-84A-12-83 0 Void Visible - Small BREACH B-230 Lift Station 1 Broken 8-203-8-202 0 Void Visible - Small Pipe Repair - General PIPE REPAIR PRA Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-75-1-74 4 PIPE REPAIR PR-2 Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-46-1-45 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-3 Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-36A-1-36 8 PIPE REPAIR PR-4 Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-55-1-52 5 PIPE REPAIR PR-5 Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-55-1-52 4 PIPE REPAIR PR-6 Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-79-1-78 8 PIPE REPAIR PR-7 Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-46-1-45 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-8 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 7-39B-7-39C 0 Packet Page 559 of 895 Table FA Granite Known Deficiencies - Dig up and Replace Problem Category Identifier Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments CIP No. PIPE REPAIR PR-9 Lynnwood WWTP Pipe Repair 3-65-3-66A 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-10 Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 3-12F-3-12E 2 PIPE REPAIR PRA 1 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 8-114-8-113 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-12 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-181-12-182 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-13 Storm Lines Pipe Repair 8-322 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-14 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-84A-12-83 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-15 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-71-12-73 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-16 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-75-8-14 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-17 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-73-12-75 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-18 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12N-79-13-65B 3 PIPE REPAIR PR-19 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-101-12-95 1 PIPE REPAIR PR-20 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-75-8-14 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-21 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-57-12-58 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-22 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 9-299-9-298 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-23 Metro Pipe Repair 16-27-16-31 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-24 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 13-65A-12-7 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-25 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-42-12-43 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-26 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 16-133-16-134 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-27 Metro Pipe Repair 14-73-14-72 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-28 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 16-128-16-129 0 PIPE REPAIR PR-29 Metro Pipe Repair 14-65-14-64 1 0 Packet Page 560 of 895 Table F.5 (similar to Table B.1) Over Capacity JIL Expected Year of Improvement Improvements Needed CIP No. Anticipated 2013 - 2019 Anticipated 2019 - 2033 Anticipated 2033 - Buildout Pipe Segment Exisitng Diameter (inches) Proposed Diameter (inches) 7-32D-ED-WWTA 36 42 Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter 11-20-11-19 a 24 42 11-18-7-33 24 42 16-127-16-128 24 42 11-19-11-18 24 42 17-87-17-88 24 36 17-48-17-59 24 36 17-88-17-89 24 36 17-47-17-48 24 36 17-59-17-60 24 36 17-61-17-84 24 36 17-60-17-61 24 36 17-85-17-86 24 36 17-84-17-85 24 36 17-86-17-87 24 36 16-132-16-133 24 36 16-128-16-129 24 36 12-268-12-278 24 36 16-135-16-136 24 36 16-136-16-137 24 36 16-129-16-130 24 36 16-131-16-132 24 36 15-7-15-5A 24 36 15-13-15-13A 24 36 12-267-12-268 24 36 15-11-15-10 24 36 15-8-15-7 24 36 16-135A-16-1350 24 36 12-265-12-267 24 36 16-133-16-134 24 36 15-3-15-2A 24 36 15-11A-15-11 24 36 11-25-11-24 24 36 15-5A-15-4A 24 36 15-4A-15-4 24 36 15-10-15-9 24 36 11-28A-11-27 24 36 8-265-8-266 15 21 8-280-8-281 15 21 8-281-8-282 15 21 8-278-8-279 15 21 8-275-8-278 15 21 8-266-8-275 15 21 8-279-8-280 15 21 7-84-7-85 15 18 14-62-14-63 12 18 14-64-17-14 12 18 17-9-17-10 12 18 17-11-17-17 A 12 18 17-14-17-9 12 18 17-10-17-11 12 18 14-63-14-64 12 18 7-40-7-48 12 18 7-41-7-40 12 18 14-53-14-55 12 18 14-56-14-62 12 18 7-48-7-47 12 18 7-47-7-50 12 18 12-1 -12-1 8 18 12-105D-12-105 8 18 12-105E-12-105F 8 18 12-105F-12-105T 8 18 Packet Page 561 of 895 Table F.5 (similar to Table B.1) Over Capacity Expected Year of Improvement Improvements Needed CIP No. Anticipated 2013 - 2019 Anticipated 2019 - 2033 Anticipated 2033 - Buildout 12-105U-11-28B 8 18 Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter 14-50-14-50C A 12 15 14-25-14-41 10 15 8-35-8-36 10 15 9-202-9-20 10 15 9-2-9-1A 10 15 9-193-9-196 10 15 9-19-9-18 10 15 9-201-9-202 10 15 9-196-9-196A M 10 15 9-16-9-15 IR 10 15 9-17-9-16 Ej 10 15 9-18-9-17 10 15 9-200-9-201 10 15 9-199-9-200 10 15 9-198-9-199 10 15 9-197-9-198 10 15 9-196A-9-197 10 15 9-20-9-19 10 15 9-15-9-14 10 15 8-33-8-34 10 15 8-34-8-35 10 15 14-48-14-50 10 15 9-224-9-202 8 15 14-26-14-25 8 15 8-41-8-42 8 15 4-94-4-93 10 12 4-91-4-90 10 12 4-161-4-95 10 12 4-162-4-161 10 12 4-163-4-162 10 12 4-173-4-163 10 12 9-189-9-190 10 12 4-92-4-91 A 10 12 14-48A-14-48 10 12 4-93-4-92 10 12 4-83-4-82 A 10 12 4-89-4-86 10 12 4-84-4-83 10 12 12 4-81-4-80 10 8-243-8-241 10 12 8-50-8-5 10 12 14-40-14- 8 12 14-34-14-33 8 12 9-188-9-189 8 12 14-30-14-27 8 12 14-31-14-30 8 12 8-4-8-5 8 12 8-2A-8-3 8 12 12-105I-12-105 8 12 8-2-8-2A 8 12 12-73-12-75 8 12 8-51-8-50 8 12 16-125-16-127 30 42 16-124-16-125 30 42 16-123-16-124 30 42 7-33-7-32 30 42 11-21-11-20 24 42 16-134-16-135 24 36 16-130A-16-131 24 36 16-130-16-130A 24 36 16-137-15-13 M 24 36 15-13A-15-12 24 36 15-2-15-2B 24 36 Packet Page 562 of 895 Table F.5 (similar to Table B.1) Over Capacity Expected Year of Improvement Improvements Needed CIP No. Anticipated 2013 - 2019 Anticipated 2019 - 2033 Anticipated 2033 - Buildout 15-2B-12-265 24 36 Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter 15-4-15-3 24 36 12-295A-12-295B.A 24 36 7-52-7-51 0 12 18 17-82-17-83 91111 10 18 15 15 15 9-193A-9-193 10 14-METER3-14-47 10 9-14-9-13 10 9-10-9-9 10 15 9-9-13-63F M 10 15 9-11-9-10 10 15 9-12-9-11 10 15 9-13-9-12 10 15 9-1A-8-33 10 15 8-42-8-43 8 15 4-80-4-78 10 12 8-244-8-243 10 12 17-78-17-82 8 12 17-89-17-90 24 36 15-12-15-11A 24 36 9-190-9-193A 10 12 17-81-17-82 8 12 17-80-17-81 8 12 7-32C-7-32D 36 42 7-32-7-32A 24 42 16-METER2-16-1 30 36 16-119-16-METER 30 36 16-122-16-123 30 36 16-121-16-122 30 36 16-120-16-121 30 36 16-117-16-118 30 36 15-2A-15-2 24 1 36 11-24A-11-23 24 36 11-23-11-21 24 36 11-27-11-26 24 36 17-93-17-90 24 30 8-249-8-265 15 21 12-294A-12-295M 8 18 11-28B-11-28 a 8 18 14-50C-14-50D 9P 12 15 14-52A-14-53 12 15 14-50E-14-51 12 15 14-50D-14-50E 12 15 14-52-14-52A 12 15 14-46-14-METER3 10 15 14-47-14-48 10 15 8-40-8-41 10 15 8-39-8-40 10 15 8-36-8-37 10 15 8-37-8-39 10 15 4-173A-4-173 10 12 4-78-8-244 dj 10 12 4-82-4-81 10 12 8-21A-8-51 10 12 8-52-8-59 10 12 16-83-17-69 8 12 14-7A-14-7 8 12 4-100-4-100A 8 12 17-69-17-73 8 12 8-3-8-4 A 8 12 17-75-17-78 8 12 14-27-14-26 8 12 17-74-17-75 Mi 8 12 12-75-8-1 8 12 Packet Page 563 of 895 Table F.5 (similar to Table B.1) Over Capacity Expected Year of Improvement Improvements Needed CIP No. Anticipated 2013 - 2019 Anticipated 2019 - 2033 Anticipated 2033 - Buildout 30 30 36 Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter Increase Pipe Diameter 36 11-26-11-25A 24 36 17-90-SHORELINE 24 36 17-92-17-93 24 30 17-46-17-47 24 36 15-9-15-8 24 36 12-277-12-298 A 24 36 11-24-11-24A 24 36 12-298-12-297 24 36 12-278-12-277 24 36 12-295-12-295 24 36 12-297-12-295 24 36 12-295B-11-28 24 36 11-24B-11-24A 8 24 14-62B-14-63A 15 18 14-63B-14-64A 15 18 14-63A-14-63B 15 18 14-64A-17-15 15 18 8-57-7-41 12 18 14-55-14-56 12 18 7-50-7-52 12 18 17-83-17-84 10 18 14-41-14-42 10 15 14-42-14-46 10 15 13-63F-9-7 10 15 4-174-4-173A 10 12 4-85-4-84 10 12 4-86-4-85 10 12 4-90-4-89 10 12 8-13-8-21A 10 12 14-38-14-37 8 12 13-3-14-48B 8 12 14-35-14-34 8 12 17-73-17-74 8 12 8-56-7-41 24 18 9-7-9-2 10 15 Packet Page 564 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Red Granite Area O&M Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserve Surcharge SUM of Reach 8-58-8-57 0 176 30 0 0 206 SUM of Reach 8-50-8-52 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 34 15 8 10 67 SUM of Reach 17-61-17-84 484 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 0 28 0 0 10 20 58 SUM of Reach 8-77-8-76 0 44 5 0 0 49 SUM of Reach 7-79-7-80 0 30 15 0 0 45 SUM of Reach 8-68-8-68A 0 31 8 0 0 39 SUM of Reach 11-8-11-7 0 12 26 0 0 38 SUM of Reach 8-75-8-57 0 0 38 0 0 38 SUM of Reach 8-265-8-266 438 Increase 15' to 21" F.5 0 6 0 0 10 20 36 Metro SUM of Reach 17-47-17-48 500 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 20 34 Metro SUM of Reach 17-48-17-59 506 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 20 34 Metro SUM of Reach 17-60-17-61 179 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 20 34 Metro SUM of Reach 17-84-17-85 457 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 20 34 Metro SUM of Reach 17-85-17-86 111 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 20 34 Metro SUM of Reach 17-86-17-87 43 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 20 34 Metro SUM of Reach 17-87-17-88 35 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 20 34 SUM of Reach 9-224-9-202 Increase 8" to 15" F.5 10 4 10 0 10 34 SUM of Reach 8-76-8-75 0 29 5 0 0 34 SUM of Reach SUM of Reach 8-244-8-243 12-143-12-142 305 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 0 3 5 0 25 0 0 10 10 0 20 20 33 30 30 SUM of Reach 12-84A-12-83 0 10 5 14 0 29 SUM of Reach 13-53-9-212 0 4 25 0 0 29 SUM of Reach 7-9-7-10 0 15 14 0 0 29 SUM of Reach 12-75-8-14 0 0 0 28 0 28 SUM of Reach 5-260-5-344 0 23 5 0 0 28 SUM of Reach 7-78-7-79 0 28 0 0 0 28 SUM of Reach 5-261-5-260 0 22 5 0 0 27 SUM of Reach 12-133-12-134 0 16 0 10 0 26 SUM of Reach 14-66-14-65 0 16 10 0 0 26 SUM of Reach 8-136-8-137 0 14 12 0 0 26 SUM of Reach 12-109-12-110 0 5 20 0 0 25 SUM of Reach 5-267-5-261 0 25 0 0 0 25 SUM of Reach 8-332-8-331 0 5 20 0 0 25 SUM of Reach 8-249-8-265 98 0 1 3 0 0 20 24 SUM of Reach 8-3-8-4 0 24 0 0 0 24 SUM of Reach 14-34-14-33 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 13 0 0 10 23 SUM of Reach 8-52-8-59 0 23 0 0 0 23 SUM of Reach 8-4-8-5 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 12 0 0 10 22 SUM of Reach 13-21A-13-21 0 19 3 0 0 22 SUM of Reach 8-107-8-106 0 6 10 6 0 22 SUM of Reach 8-59A-8-59 0 13 9 0 0 22 SUM of Reach 0o s SUM of Reach 8-78-8-77 12-101-12-95 0 0 0 15 1 2 3 0 5 4 0 14 0 0 0 20 22 21 21 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 16-128-16-129 0 Increase 24" to 36" F.3 0 0 0 10 10 20 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 12-73-12-75 Increase 8 to 12" F.3 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 20 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 16-133-16-134 0 Increase 24" to 36" F.3 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 20 SUM of Reach 8-243-8-242 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 0 10 0 10 20 SUM of Reach 8-280-8-281 Increase 15' to 21" F.5 0 0 10 0 10 20 SUM of Reach 1-55-1-52 0 0 0 20 0 20 SUM of Reach 7-37-7-36 0 15 5 0 0 20 Packet Page 565 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharged TOTAL Red Area Granite Observed Surcharge 8-242-8-245 20 20 Observed Surcharge 8-245-8-246 171 20 20 Observed Surcharge 8-247-8-248 71 20 20 Large SUM of Reach Ek.. 141 0 5 15 0 0 20 20 20 8-285-8-284 SUM of Reach 9-363A-9-363 0 8 12 0 0 20 SUM of Reach 8-51-8-50 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 4 5 0 10 19 SUM of Reach 4-60-4-62 0 19 0 0 0 19 SUM of Reach 7-34-7-30 0 14 5 0 0 19 SUM of Reach 8-135-8-316 5 9 5 0 0 19 SUM of Reach 8-6813-8-68 0 2 17 0 0 19 SUM of Reach 8-UNK 1-8-330A 0 19 0 0 0 19 SUM of Reach 9-299-9-298 0 6 3 10 0 19 SUM of Reach 10-27-10-28 0 18 0 0 0 18 SUM of Reach 12-49-12-50 0 0 8 10 0 18 SUM of Reach 13-22-13-22A 0 0 18 0 0 18 SUM of Reach 8-182-8-179 0 18 0 0 0 18 SUM of Reach 9-20-9-19 Increase 10" to 15" 0 8 0 0 10 18 SUM of Reach 12N-79-13-65B 0 0 3 14 0 17 SUM of Reach 8-73-8-74 0 17 0 0 0 17 SUM of Reach 8-281-8-282 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 0 1 5 0 10 16 SUM of Reach 9-11-9-10 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 0 6 0 0 10 16 SUM of Reach 12-134-12-132 0 2 14 0 0 16 SUM of Reach 12-1-8-1 0 16 0 0 0 16 SUM of Reach 13-4-14-49 0 16 0 0 0 16 SUM of Reach 14-67-14-66 0 16 0 0 0 16 SUM of Reach 17-23-17-39 0 16 0 0 0 16 SUM of Reach 7-46-7-47 0 11 5 0 0 16 SUM of Reach 8-21A-8-51 0 16 0 0 0 16 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 8-35-8-36 N/A Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 5 0 0 10 15 Metro SUM of Reach SUM of Reach 17-78-17-82 12-126-12-125 0 Longitudinal - Wider (8" - 12") F.2 and F.5 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 3 15 0 0 0 10 10 0 15 15 15 SUM of Reach 1-36A-1-36 0 5 0 10 0 15 SUM of Reach 7-43-7-40 0 15 0 0 0 15 SUM of Reach 7-61-7-60 0 15 0 0 0 15 SUM of Reach 7-81-7-82 0 15 0 0 0 15 SUM of Reach 8-112-8-117 0 10 5 0 0 15 SUM of Reach 8-114-8-113 0 5 0 10 0 15 SUM of Reach 8-178-8-177A 0 15 0 0 0 15 SUM of Reach 8-240-8-239 0 5 10 0 0 15 SUM of Reach 8-31-8-30 0 15 0 0 0 15 SUM of Reach 8-59-8-58 0 5 10 0 0 15 Metro SUM of Reach 14-48-14-50 0 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 14 Metro SUM of Reach 17-88-17-89 0 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 14 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 7-47-7-50 0 Increase 12" to 18" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 14 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 7-48-7-47 0 Increase 12" to 18" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 14 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 8-34-8-35 0 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 14 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 9-193-9-196 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 14 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 9-19-9-18 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 14 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 9-201-9-202 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 14 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 9-202-9-20 Increase 10" to 15" F.1 and F.5 0 4 0 0 10 14 Packet Page 566 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table iii Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserve Surcharg414 SUM of Reach 4-163-4-162 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 4 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 9-188-9-189 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 4 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 11-6-11-5 0 6 8 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 12-132-12-131 0 0 14 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 14-65-14-64 0 4 0 10 0 14 SUM of Reach 2-29-2-28 0 5 5 4 0 14 SUM of Reach 3-66E-3-66D 0 8 3 3 0 14 SUM of Reach 4-78-8-244 0 14 0 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 5-33413-5-334A 0 14 0 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 7-35-7-33B 0 5 5 4 0 14 SUM of Reach 7-50-7-52 0 4 10 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 7-66-8-327 0 14 0 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 7-83-7-84 0 14 0 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 8-269-8-267 0 14 0 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 8-54-8-56 0 14 0 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 8-71-8-72 0 5 9 0 0 14 SUM of Reach 8-41-8-42 Increase 8" to 15' F.5 0 3 0 0 10 13 SUM of Reach 10-6-10-5 0 5 8 0 0 13 SUM of Reach 12-248-12-247 0 0 13 0 0 13 SUM of Reach 14-29-14-28 0 5 8 0 0 13 SUM of Reach 8-18-8-55 0 13 0 0 0 13 SUM of Reach 9-262A-9-262 0 8 5 0 0 13 SUM of Reach 8-2-8-2A Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 2 0 0 10 12 SUM of Reach 8-2A-8-3 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 2 0 0 10 12 SUM of Reach 11-9A-7-35 0 12 0 0 0 12 SUM of Reach 14-3-14-3A 0 0 9 3 0 12 SUM of Reach 2-113A-2-113 0 1 11 0 0 12 SUM of Reach 8-60-8-59A 0 12 0 0 0 12 SUM of Reach 8-87-8-86 0 12 0 0 0 12 SUM of Reach 9-150-5-336 0 7 5 0 0 12 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 11-19-11-18 0 Increase from 24 to 42 F.5 0 1 0 0 10 11 SUM of Reach 12-54-12-53 0 11 0 0 0 11 SUM of Reach 12-95-12-94 0 6 5 0 0 11 SUM of Reach 3-12F-3-12E 0 1 0 10 0 11 SUM of Reach 5-42-5-41 0 8 0 3 0 11 SUM of Reach 8-203-8-202 0 7 0 4 0 11 SUM of Reach 8-72-8-73 0 6 5 0 0 11 SUM of Reach 8-97-8-98 0 1 10 0 0 11 SUM of Reach 9-109-8-193 0 11 0 0 0 11 Lift Station 1 SUM of Reach 4-83-4-82 N/A Increase 10" to 12" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 0 10 10 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 7-33-7-32 Increase 30" to 42" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 0 10 10 Edmonds WWTP TroTe—FINPI—pe- Large 1 - -105K 0 0 0 10 0 10 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-181-12-182 0 F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-42-12-43 0 Ir F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-57-12-58 0 F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-71-12-73 0 F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 13-65A-12-7 0 F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Metro Pipe Repair 14-73-14-72 0 F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Metro Pipe Repair 16-27-16-31 0 F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-79-1-78 8 F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Lift Station 4 Hole in Pipe - Large 2-6413-2-68 0 ON, F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Lynnwood WWTP Pipe Repair 3-65-3-66A 0 RP F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Packet Page 567 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharged TOTAL Red Granite Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 7-39B-7-39C 8-322 0 0 F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 Storm Lines Pipe Repair F.3 0 0 0 10 0 10 el del Capacity - Mo 11-20-11-19 ncrease from 24 to 4 Increase from 24 to 42 F.5 0 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 Capacity - Model 11-21-11-20 Increase from 24 to 42 1. 10 10 Capacity - Model 11-25-11-24 Increase from 24 to 36 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 11-28A-11-27 Increase from 24 to 36 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-105D-12-105E Increase from 8 to 18 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-105E-12-105F Increase from 8 to 18 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-10517-12-105T Increase from 8 to 18 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-105I-12-105H Increase from 8 to 12 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-105T-12-105U Increase from 8 to 18 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-105U-11-28B Increase from 8 to 18 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-265-12-267 Increase 24 to 36 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-267-12-268 Increase 24 to 36 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-268-12-278 Increase 24 to 36 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 12-295A-12-295B Increase 24 to 36 F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-25-14-41 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-26-14-25 Increase 8 " to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-30-14-27 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-31-14-30 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-40-14-39 Increase 8 " to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-48A-14-48 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-50-14-50C Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-53-14-55 Increase 12" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-62-14-63 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 A 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-63-14-64 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-64-17-14 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 14-METER3-14-47 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 0 0 0 0 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-10-15-9 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 0 0 0 0 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-11-15-10 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 0 0 0 0 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-11A-15-11 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-12-15-11A Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-13-15-13A Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-13A-15-12 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-2-15-26 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-26-12-265 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-3-15-2A Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-4-15-3 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-4A-15-4 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-5A-154A Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-7-15-5A Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 15-8-15-7 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-123-16-124 Increase 30" to 42" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-124-16-125 Increase 30" to 42" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-125-16-127 Increase 30" to 42" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-127-16-128 Increase 24" to 42" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-129-16-130 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-130-16-130A Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-130A-16-131 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-131-16-132 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-132-16-133 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Packet Page 568 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - andurcharged ReplaceTOTAL Dig up4,11 bserved Red Granite Capacity - Model 16-134-16-1 Increase 24" to 36" 10 Capacity -Model 16-135-16-136 24 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 Capacity - Model 16-135A-16-135 24 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-136-16-137 24 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 16-137-15-13 24 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 17-10-17-11 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 17-11-17-17 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 17-14-17-9 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 17-80-17-81 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 17-81-17-82 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 17-82-17-83 Increase 10" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 17-89-17-90 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 17-9-17-10 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-161-4-95 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-162-4-161 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-173-4-163 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-80-4-78 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-81-4-80 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-84-4-83 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-89-4-86 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-91-4-90 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-92-4-91 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-93-4-92 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 4-94-4-93 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity- Model 7-32D-ED-WWTP Increase 36" to 42" F.5 0 10 10 Capacity - Model 7-40-7-48 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 7-41-7-40 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 7-52-7-51 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 7-84-7-85 Increase 15" to 18" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 8-266-8-275 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 8-275-8-278 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 8-278-8-279 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 8-279-8-280 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 8-33-8-34 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 8-42-8-43 Increase 8" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-10-9-9 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-12-9-11 10 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-13-9-12 10 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-14-9-13 10 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-15-9-14 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-16-9-15 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-17-9-16 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-18-9-17 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-189-9-190 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-190-9-193A Increase 10" to 12" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-193A-9-193 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-196-9-196A Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-196A-9-197 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-197-9-198 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-198-9-199 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-199-9-200 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Capacity - Model 9-1A-8-33 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 Packet Page 569 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharged TOTAL Red Ar Granite Capacity - Model 9-200-9-201 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 10 10 SUM of Reach 12-106-12-107 F 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 10 0 10 10 10 SUM of Reach 12-107-12-108 0 0 10 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-121-12-119 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-123-12-121 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-128-12-127 0 0 10 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-13-12-14 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-139-12-138 0 5 5 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-14-12-15 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-156-12-155 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-16-12-17 0 5 5 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-185D-12-130 0 0 10 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-87-12-86 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 12-93-12-90 0 0 10 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 13-166A-13-166 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 13-81A-13-81 B 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 14-7L-14-7B 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 2-91-2-90 0 5 5 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 5-156-5-151 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 7-56-7-55 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 7-65-7-66 0 5 5 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 7-76-7-75 0 0 10 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 7-77-7-76 0 0 10 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-101A-8-100 0 5 5 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-167-8-165 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-257-8-257A 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-287-8-286 0 0 10 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-291A-8-291 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-298-8-297 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-303B-8-303D 0 0 10 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-329A-8-329 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-5-8-6 0 10 0 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 8-98-8-99 0 0 10 0 0 10 SUM of Reach 9-225-9-224 0 2 8 0 0 10 Metro Hole in Pipe - Medium 10-3-10-4 0 MEDIUM F.2 0 0 9 0 0 9 Lift Station 12 Hole in Pipe - Medium 1-16-1-20 0 MEDIUM F.2 0 0 9 0 0 9 Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Medium 8-245A-8-245 0 MEDIUM F.2 0 0 9 0 0 9 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Medium 9-301-9-300 0 MEDIUM F.2 0 0 9 0 0 9 SUM of Reach 11-23A-11-21 0 5 0 4 0 9 SUM of Reach 12-246-12-243 0 6 3 0 0 9 SUM of Reach 1-31-1-30 0 4 5 0 0 9 SUM of Reach 14-7-14-7A 5 4 0 0 0 9 SUM of Reach 7-38-7-36 0 4 5 0 0 9 SUM of Reach 8-155-8-352 0 9 0 0 0 9 SUM of Reach 8-178A-8-177A 0 4 5 0 0 9 SUM of Reach 8-30-8-29 0 4 5 0 0 9 SUM of Reach 9-347-9-348 0 9 0 0 0 9 SUM of Reach 9-59-9-60 0 0 5 4 0 9 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small 12-200-12-112 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 Lift Station 4 Hole in Pipe - Small 2-89-2-88 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 Packet Page 570 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 4-186-4-185 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 5-269-5-267 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 8-202-8-201 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 9-80A-9-80 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small INLET-7-61 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 12-10513-12-105A 0 5 3 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 12-28-8-2 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 12-51-8-11 0 0 5 3 0 8 SUM of Reach 13-157-13-156 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 13-56-13-57 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 14-7G-14-7F 0 4 0 4 0 8 SUM of Reach 3-94-3-93 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 4-196-4-200 0 5 3 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 5-122-5-121 0 2 0 6 0 8 SUM of Reach 5-135-5-134 0 5 3 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 5-325-511 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 5-7-5-8 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 7-49-7-49A 0 5 3 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 8-197-8-199 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 8-70-8-71 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 8-99-8-316 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 9-175-9-177 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 9-273A-9-273 0 3 5 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 9-314-9-366 0 8 0 0 0 8 SUM of Reach 9-364-9-363 0 8 0 0 0 8 Lift Station 12 - F.3 0 0 0 7 0 7 SUM of Reach 12-175-12-146 0 7 0 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 12-72-12-71 0 2 5 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 16-106-16-110 0 7 0 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 16-59-16-60 0 7 0 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 2-112-2-111 0 4 3 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 4-131-4-100 0 7 0 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 4-134-4-133 0 7 0 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 8-17-8-18 0 3 0 4 0 7 SUM of Reach 8-291-8-283 0 7 0 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 8-331-8-330 0 2 5 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 8-43-8-44 0 7 0 0 0 7 SUM of Reach 8-851 0 1 6 0 0 7 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Abandoned 5-203-5-201 N/A 0 6 0 0 0 6 1048 Walnut Street Grit (a lot) 8-2A-8-2 205 Conc 1 6 0 0 0 0 6 942 Alder Street Grit (a lot) 8-30-8-31 275 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 6 10th at Alder Street Grit (a lot) 8-31-8-32 336 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 6 Alder St at Yost Park Grit (a lot) 8-328-8-2 265 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 6 1053 Alder Street Grit (a lot) 8-32A-8-32B 55 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 6 10th Ave South at Walnut St Grit (a lot) 8-4-8-3 335 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 6 935 Walnut Street Grit (a lot) 8-5-8-4 260 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 6 8620 Maplewood Lane hi lot) 9-139-9-137 155 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 12-105N-12-105M 0 0 0 6 0 6 SUM of Reach 12-135-12-134 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 12-160-12-149 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 12-208-12-207 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 12-226-12-225 0 1 5 0 0 6 Packet Page 571 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category kL Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite SUM of Reach 12-243-12-241 0 3 3 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 12-287-12-286 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 12-71-12-89 0 1 5 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 13-113-13-112 0 0 6 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 16-37-16-38 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 16-9-16-8 0 1 5 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 2-27-2-25 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 3-131-3-132 0 1 5 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 4-30-4-28 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 4-52-4-52A 0 1 5 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 4-52A-4-53 0 0 0 6 0 6 SUM of Reach 5-14-5-15 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 5-299-5-300 0 1 5 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 5-74-5-72 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 8-175-8-174 0 0 3 3 0 6 SUM of Reach 8-2D-8-2B 0 0 6 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 8-55-8-55A 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 9-117-9-116 0 1 5 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 9-26213-9-262A 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 9-264-9-266 0 1 5 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 9-273-9-274 0 6 0 0 0 6 SUM of Reach 9-287-9-286 0 6 0 0 0 6 7122 210th Street Grease 10-23-10-25 283 Conc 5 0 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals- Connections 11-2-11-7 N/A 1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 11-7-11-9 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-111-12-68 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-119-12-117 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-124-12-123 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-125-12-123 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-127-12-125 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-129-12-127 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-137-12-136 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-144-12-146 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-147-12-148 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-154-12-153 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 9223 216th Street Black Water 12-156-13-96 380 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWI P Problem Laterals - Connections 12-17-12-18 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 1153 8th Ave S. Grit, Black Water 12-189-12-190 c/o 120 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 PIPE REPAIR 1115 8th Ave S. Grit, Black Water 12-191-12-189 285 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 736 Fir Street Black Water 12-192-12-191 200 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 PIPE REPAIR Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-209-12-207 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-46-12-46A N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-47-12-49 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-5-12-2 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-6-12-5 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-69-12-67 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-90-12-87 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals -Connections 12-94A-12-94 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 BREACH Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 13-146-13-145 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 16131 75th Place West Grease 1-36-1-36A 211 PVC F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 13-87-13-88 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 12 Problem Laterals - Connections 1-39-1-38 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Packet Page 572 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Red Area Granite Q&M Granite - Treohless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Edmonds W WTP Problem Laterals - Connections 13-99-13-98 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 21808 Highway 99 Black Water 14-22-14-24 360 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 21309 76th Ave W (Drop MH) Grit, Black Water 14-40-9-254 330 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 14-47-14-48 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 215th At72nd Black Water 14-6-14-7 260 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 74th at228th St Grease 14-65-14-66 320 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 14-70-14-69 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 72nd Ave W. at 215th St Black Water 14-7A-14-7B 255 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Edmonds W WTP Problem Laterals -Connections 15-3C-15-313 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 240th at 78th Ave W Black Water 16-76-16-77 160 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 240th St and 78th Ave W Grit, Black Water 16-77-16-65 275 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 16-99-16-102 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 23819 76th Ave W Black Water 17-72-Main 44 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 23821 76th Ave Grease 17-73-17-69 232 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 76th Ave W.at242nd St Black Water 17-81-17-80 360 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 24122 76th Ave W Black Water 17-82-17-81 105 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 PROBLEM JOINTS Lift Station 12 Problem Laterals - Connections 1-9-1-9A N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 4 Problem Laterals - Connections 2-131-2-132 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 BREACH Lynnwood W WTP Problem Laterals - Connections 3-130-3-129 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lynnwood W WTP Problem Laterals - Connections 3-157-3-156 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 7117 176th St. SW Dirt, Grease, Grit 3-93-3-94 150 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-119-4-121 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-13-4-42 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-171-4-173A N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 3 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-58-4-59 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 3 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-62-4-63 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-113-5-111 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-137-5-136 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lynnwood W WTP Problem Laterals - Connections 5-160-5-159 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Dellwood Dr. at 78th Ave W Black Water 5-191-5-187 200 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-240B-5-240A N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 ROOTS Lift Station 9 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-309-5-304 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 ROOTS Lynnwood W WTP Problem Laterals - Connections 5-324-5-324A N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 ROOTS 7601 OVD Post Office Grit 5-325-5-328 350 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 18209 76th Ave West Grit 5-325-5-511-11 80 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 ROOTS Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-55-5-54 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 PROBLEM JOINTS Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-67-5-66 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-81-5-80 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-87-5-86 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 10 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-88G-5-88E N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Admiral Way at Dayton Grease 7-11-7-10 80 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Admiral Way Grease 7-3-7-2 425 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Admiral Way Grease 7-4-7-3 380 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Admiral Way Grease 7-5-7-4 380 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Edmonds W WTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-59-7-57 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Admiral Way Grease 7-6-7-5 280 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Edmonds W WTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-69-7-70 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Admiral Way at West Dayton Grit 7-6-CO 125 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Admiral Way at Dayton Grease 7-7-7-11 37 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Admiral Way Grease 7-7-7-6 35 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Edmonds W WTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-80-7-61 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Miscellaneous Meters Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-150-8-149 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Packet Page 573 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite Miscellaneous Meters Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-160-8-159 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-163-8-162 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-165-8-164 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-172A-8-172 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-183-8-182 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-255-8-254 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-257A-8-254 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-285-8-284 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-28-8-27 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-303-8-303A N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-32-8-31 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-335-8-UNK 1 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 1033 Walnut Street Grit 8-3-8-2A 130 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-53-8-54 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-55A-8-57 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-59-8-58 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 8-64-8-63 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 7th Ave at Edmonds St Black Water 8-99-8-101A 207 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 8705 Maplewood Lane Grit, Black Water 9-137-9-138 340 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 8610 Main Street Grit 9-16-9-19 178 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 8610 Main Street Black Water 9-19-9-20 56 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Pine Ridge Park Black Water 9-202-9-201+ 165 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Bpind Ridge Park Black Water 9-202-9-224 503 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Pine Ridge Park Black Water 9-20-9-202 430 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-234-9-233 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-235-9-235A N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-242-9-241 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 76th at 212th Street S.W. Grease 9-254-9-255 305 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 9-259-9-251 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 9-262C-9-262B N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 9-266-9-267 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 7703 203 Street SW Grit 9-314-9-313 310 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 7804 200th Street Black Water 9-347-9-346 130 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 7907 200th Street (Drop MH) Black Water 9-348-9-347 400 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 7726 202 Place Grit, Black Water 9-366-9-314 350 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 9-36-9-37 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 Metro Crack 10-10-10-7 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-1A-7-39A 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-3-11-2 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-196-12-198 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 PIPE REPAIR Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-24-12-23 2 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-249-12-248 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-37-12-38 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-55-12-56 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-8-12-6 1 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Metro Crack 13-20-13-15 0 Longitudinal - Wider F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Metro Crack 16-103-16-106 1 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Metro Crack 17-31-17-28 1 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Metro Crack 17-63-17-64 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 4 Crack 2-83-2-82 0 Longitudinal -Wider F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lynnwood WWTP Crack 3-10913-3-109A 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lynnwood WWTP Crack 3-1H-3-3A2 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Packet Page 574 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite Lift Station 1 Crack 4-124-4-123 0 Circular - Wider F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Crack 4-217A-4-217 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Crack 5-263-5-262 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 9 Crack 5-299-5-300 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lynnwood WWTP Crack 5-319-5-320 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Crack 7-75-7-74 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-189-8-194 0 Spiral - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-206-8-205 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-219H-8-219G 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Crack 8-286-8-285 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-74-8-75 4 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Infiltration in the Joint 9-136-9-136A N/A Medium F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 1 Infiltration in the Joint 9-170-9-172 N/A Light F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Edmonds WWTP Crack 9-274-9-275 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 Lift Station 9 Crack 9-326-9-327 1 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 11-1-11-2 0 0 5 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 11-21A-11-21 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 12-144-12-146 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 12-148-12-141 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 12-151A-12-151 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 12-2-12-1 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 12-289-12-288A 0 2 3 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 12-74-12-73 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 12-98-12-96 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 4-110-4-109 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 4-115-8-219H 0 1 0 4 0 5 SUM of Reach 5-14813-5-149 0 2 3 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 5-239-5-238 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 7-60-7-56 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 8-162-8-161 0 1 0 4 0 5 SUM of Reach 8-18813-8-188A 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 8-195-8-196 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 8-6413-8-64A 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 9-159-9-158 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 9-270-9-308 0 5 0 0 0 5 SUM of Reach 9-289-9-290 0 5 0 0 0 5 Metro Edmonds WWTP Pegressions in Pipe Depressions in Pipe 10-25-10-26 11-15-11-14 0 0 F.1 F.1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-109A-12-111 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-149A-12-149 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-180-12-181 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-185F-12-185A 108 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 PIPE REPAIR Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-189-12-191 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 PIPE REPAIR Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-190-12-189 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 PIPE REPAIR Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-204-12-203 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 12-26-12-24 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-120-13-121 11 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-36-13-35 5 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-39-13-37 12 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 13-4A-13-4 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-57-13-59 14 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 13-59-13-60 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Packet Page 575 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-11-14-10 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-16-14-11 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-21-14-4 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 12 Depressions in Pipe 1-43-1-24 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-38-14-37 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-3E-14-3F 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-46-14-METER . 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 BREACH Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-49-14-49D 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 14-69-14-68 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 16-101-16-102 3 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 16-57-16-75 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-19-17-23 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-38-17-37 4 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-39-17-46 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-46-17-47 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 BREACH Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-77-17-78 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 PROBLEM JOINTS Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-95-17-94 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-96-17-95 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-97-17-96 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 17-98-17-97 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 2-47-2-49 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 3-12-2-2 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 3-23-3-24 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 BREACH Lift Station 12 Depressions in Pipe 3-21-1-3-21 24 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 3-8-3-9 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 BREACH Lift Station 3 Depressions in Pipe 4-65-4-67 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 3 Depressions in Pipe 4-70A-4-71-LIFT 3 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 4-79-4-78 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-144-5-145 1 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-177-5-176 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-187-5-191 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-195A-5-196 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 9 Depressions in Pipe 5-283-5-288 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 ROOTS Lift Station 9 Depressions in Pipe 5-300-5-301 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-321A-5-322 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lynnwood WWTP Depressions in Pipe 5-322-5N-2 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 9 Depressions in Pipe 5-334A-5-334 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 ROOTS Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-23-7-53D 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 PROBLEM JOINTS Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-30C-7-30 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 7-32C-7-32D 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Miscellaneous Meters Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-147-8-146 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-22213-8-222A 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 2 Depressions in Pipe 8-296-8-297 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-303D-8-303C 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 8-340-8-339 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-37-8-39 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-49-8-53 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-89-8-108 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 8-91-8-106 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 9-100-9-101 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 9-120-9-121 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 9-137-9-139 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Packet Page 576 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-157-9-156 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Metro Depressions in Pipe 9-253-9-254 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-271-9-270 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-274A-9-274 15 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-279-9-278 16 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-319-9-319A 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-321-9-322 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Depressions in Pipe 9-346-9-347 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Lift Station 1 Depressions in Pipe 9-55A-9-55 J 0 F.1 0 4 0 0 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 12-178-12-179 0 F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 PIPE REPAIR Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-212-12-211 0 F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-269C-12-269D 0 Soil Visible - Large F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 Metro Broken 13-14-13-13 0 F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 Metro Broken 14-28-14-27 0 Soil Visible - Large F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Broken 15-4E-15-4C 0 Soil Visible - Small F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 Lift Station 3 Broken Hole 4-75-4-74 0 F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 7-39C-7-40 0 F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-22-8-21 0 Soil Visible - Medium F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-337-8-336A 0 Soil Visible - Medium F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 Lift Station 1 Broken 8-351-8-350 0 Void Visible - Medium F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 SUM of Reach 11-14A-11-14 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 11-23C-11-21 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 11-5-11-3 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 12-140-12-139 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 12-182A-12-215 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 12-185G-12-185F 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 12-19-12-28 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 12-250-12-249 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 13-22A-13-22B 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 13-8E-13-166A 0 1 3 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 14-35-14-34 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 17-75-17-78 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 2-113-2-112 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 3-109H-3-109G 0 1 3 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 3-1D-3-2G 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 4-100-4-100A 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 4-132-4-131 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 4-141-4-142 0 1 3 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 4-86-4-85 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 8-123-8-120 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 8-250-8-249 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 8-29-8-43 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 8-311-8-312 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 8-321-7-72 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 8-39A-8-41 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 8-81B-8-81 0 4 0 0 0 4 SUM of Reach 9-276-9-277 0 1 3 0 0 4 Metro Heavy Root Problem 10-19-10-19B 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-159-12-160 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 12-293-12-293A 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 13-63B-13-63C 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Edmonds WWTP Heavy Root Problem 15-313-15-3A 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Packet Page 577 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite BREACH Metro Heavy Root Problem 16-25-16-26 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lift Station 10 Heavy Root Problem 2-113E-2-113 1 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lynnwood WWTP Heavy Root Problem 3-103-3-105 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lynnwood WWTP Heavy Root Problem 3-84A-3-85 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 4-144-4-145 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lift Station 10 Joint separated - Large 4-3-2-113B N/A F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 5-30-5-28 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 PROBLEM JOINTS Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 5-37-5-38 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lift Station 1 Heavy Root Problem 8-207-8-206 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lift Station 1 Joint separated - Large 8-346-8-343 N/A F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lift Station 9 Heavy Root Problem 9-341-9-340A 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 Lift Station 9 Heavy Root Problem 9-342-9-341 0 F.2 0 0 3 0 0 3 BREACH Lynnwood W WTP Joint Offset - Large 3-66A-3-66 N/A Large F.3 0 0 0 3 0 3 ROOTS Lift Station 7 Joint Offset - Large 7-11-7-7 N/A Large F.3 0 0 0 3 0 3 Edmonds WWTP Joint Offset - Large 9-349-9-350 N/A Large F.3 0 0 0 3 0 3 SUM of Reach 11-12-11-11 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 12-78-12-77 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 13-67-13-66 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 13-8A-13-8B 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 14-19-14-18 0 0 3 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 15-113-15-1C 0 0 3 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 2-84-2-83 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 3-109G-3-109F 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 4-137-4-133 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 4-140-4-139 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 4-9-4-7 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 5-278-5-271 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 7-44A-8-331 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 7-46A-7-46 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 8-185-8-186 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 8-289-8-288 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 8-46-8-47 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 8-86-8-112 0 3 0 0 0 3 SUM of Reach 9-181-9-182 0 0 0 3 0 3 monds WWTP meaium Koot Problem 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-153-12-150 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 12-266-12-265 N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 PIPE REPAIR Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-288-12-287 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 12-33-12-31 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Joint Gasket Exposed - Medium 13-100-13-98 N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 13-112-13-114 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-8D-13-8C 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Metro Medium Root Problem 13-9A-13-166A 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 BREACH Metro Medium Root Problem 14-44-14-43 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Metro Problem Joint - Offset Medium 16-116-16-98 N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Metro Medium Root Problem 17-44-17-46 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 10 Medium Root Problem 2-109-2-108 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 3-120-3N-4 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 3-60-3-68 N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-133-4-132 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-143-4-150 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-210-4-213A 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Packet Page 578 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 4-40-4-39 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 3 Medium Root Problem 4-56-4-57 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 5-149-5-150 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 5-217-5-216 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 9 Medium Root Problem 5-317-5-316 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 PROBLEM JOINTS Lift Station 9 Medium Root Problem 5-330E-5-330D 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 5-38-5-39 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 ROOTS Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 5-79-5-70 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 PROBLEM JOINTS Lift Station 10 Medium Root Problem 5-88A-5-88B 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 7-44-7-44A N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-178D-8-178C 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 8-18A-8-18 N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 8-196-8-196A 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 9-111-8-189D 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 9-184-9-185 N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Edmonds WWTP Medium Root Problem 9-185-9-186 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 Edmonds WWT NIML 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 11-14-11-13 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 11-23B-11-21 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 12-89-12-88 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 16-108-16-109 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 17-15-17-16 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 2-31-2-32 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 3-121-3-120 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 3-121-1-3-121 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 3-21-3-2J 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 4-138-4-137 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 5-195-5-195A 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 5-281A-5-278 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 7-64-7-62 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 7-86-7-87A 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-101 B-8-1 01 A 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-13-8-21A 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-172J-8-172F 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-193-8-192 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-21-8-21A 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-288-8-287 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-316-8-135 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-317-8-316 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-324-7-68 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 8-44-8-45 0 2 0 0 0 2 SUM of Reach 9-84-9-83 0 2 0 0 0 2 SE Corner of Hwy 99 and 2240 Clean Flume 14 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 22304 Hwy 99 Clean Flume 14 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds Way Robinhood Lan( Brush Sensor 15 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 244th and Hwy 99 - NW Cornea Clean Flume 16 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Denny's on SR 104 and Hwy 9t Clean Flume 17 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Old Ballinger Pump Station Clean Flume 17 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 East Side, NE Corner of Ballinc Clean Flume 17 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Ballinger Golf Course at 74th A Clean Flume 17 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-108-12-109 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-12-12-13 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Packet Page 579 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-151-12-22 0 IF F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-163-12-162 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-165-12-164 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-18-12-19 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joints - Offset 12-2041-12-204H F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 PIPE REPAIR Edmonds WWTP Problem Joints - Offset 12-204J-12-2041 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Joint separated - Small 12-207-12-206 N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-217-12-216 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-22-12-20 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-23413-12-234A 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-284F-12-284 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 12-70-12-69 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Roots 12-84-12-84A 42 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Light Root Problem 13-133-13-134 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Roots 13-139-13-142 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 13-55-13-56 N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Light Root Problem 13-8-13-813 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 13-89-9-11 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Light Root Problem 14-33-14-32 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Light Root Problem 14-7C-14-7A 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 15-1C-15-2 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Roots 15-3A-15-2A 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Joint separated - Small 16-115-16-116 N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Light Root Problem 16-32-16-33 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Light Root Problem 16-4-16-3 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Light Root Problem 16-46-16-47 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 BREACH Metro Light Root Problem 16-54-16-57 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Light Root Problem 16-91-16-103 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Roots 17-24-17-25 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Roots 17-25-17-26 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Roots 17-55-17-58 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Roots 17-57-17-58 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 10 Problem Joint - Offset Small 2-111-2-110 N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 4 Roots 2-90-2-89 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 3-133-3-134 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-140-3-137 N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-162-3-163 N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 BREACH Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 3-63-3-64 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 12 Problem Joint - Offset Small 3-8F-3-8A N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-109-4-108 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-115-8-219H 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-145-4-143 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-170-4-171 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-186A-4-186 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-212-4-213 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 4-221-4-220 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 3 Light Root Problem 4-45-4-46 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 3 Light Root Problem 4-46-4-47 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 3 Light Root Problem 4-69A-4-70 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 BREACH Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-118C-5-118B 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-123-4-186A 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-13-5-12 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Packet Page 580 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-141A-5-141 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-194-5-195 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-218-5-210 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-252A-5-252B 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-264-5-263 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 ROOTS Lift Station 9 Light Root Problem 5-299-5-300 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 ROOTS Lynnwood WWTP Roots 5-324A-5N-3 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 9 Light Root Problem 5-330-5-329 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 ROOTS Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 5-344-5-345 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 ROOTS Lift Station 1 Roots 5-52-5-51 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lynnwood WWTP Light Root Problem 5-75-5-74 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 10 Roots 5-8813-5-88C 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 10 Light Root Problem 5-89-5-99 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-62-7-61 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-82-7-83 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 7-85-7-86 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-102-8-101 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Miscellaneous Meters Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-137-8-292A 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Miscellaneous Meters Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-152-8-150 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-172K-8-172G 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-177-8-176 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-187A-8-187 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-188A-8-188C 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Roots 8-18913-8-189A 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-209-8-210 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-219A-8-219C 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-239-8-238 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-254-8-253 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Joint Separated 8-263-8-252 N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Problem Joint - Offset Small 8-273-8-272 N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 2 Light Root Problem 8-294-8-295 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-323-8-321 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 8-69-8-70 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 8-95-8-96 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 9-134-9-136 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-177-9-158A 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-22513-9-225 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 9-235A-9-235B N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Small 9-23513-9-217 N/A F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-237-9-236 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP Light Root Problem 9-360-9-346 6 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Problem Joints - Offset 9-44-9-43 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lift Station 1 Light Root Problem 9-85-9-86 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Metro Light Root Problem INLET-13-167 0 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 Lake Ballinger Way and 205th ; F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 SUM of Reach 12-180A-12-180 0 1 0 0 0 1 SUM of Reach 16-33-16-36 0 1 0 0 0 1 SUM of Reach 9-273C-9-273B 0 1 0 0 0 1 Edmonds WWTP 1- N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-10-12-11 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-144-12-146 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 12-177-12-176 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Packet Page 581 of 895 Table F.6 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - All categories Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace bserved Surcharge Red Granite Metro Debris and Deposits 13-23B-9-250 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 13-47-13-46 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9126 Bowdoin N/A 13-C/O C/O PVC F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 12 Debris and Deposits 1-51-1-50 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 12 Debris and Deposits 1-57-1-56 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 BREACH Metro Debris and Deposits 16-39-16-40 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 240th At Highway 99 None 16-60-16-59 330 Conc F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Metro Debris and Deposits 16-65-16-77 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 12 Debris and Deposits 1-67-1-66 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Metro Debris and Deposits 16-82-16-83 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 BREACH Metro Debris and Deposits 16-95-16-96 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Metro Debris and Deposits 17-43-17-42 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lynnwood WWTP Debris and Deposits 2-11-2-10 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 BREACH Lift Station 4 Debris and Deposits 2-62-2-63 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lynnwood WWTP Joint Gasket Exposed - Light 3-89-3-72 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-135-4-136 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-34-4-36 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-39-4-41 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-98-4-97 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lynnwood WWTP Debris and Deposits 5-164-5-163 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ROOTS 8015196th St SW 5-334A CO to mair 60 PVC F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 7-39A-7-39B N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 8-291 B-8-291 A N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7th Ave at Sprague St None 8-316-8-99 290 Conc F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7th at Edmonds St None 8-99-8-98 102 Conc F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Metro Debris and Deposits 9-247-9-248 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 9-272-9-271 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 9-62-9-61 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 BREACH Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-75-1-74 4 F.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUM of Reach 10-4-10-5 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUM of Reach 12-102-12-101 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUM of Reach 12-292-12-293 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUM of Reach 1-46-1-45 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUM of Reach 4-72A 4-72 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUM of Reach 5-246-5-245 0 0 0 0 0 0 Packet Page 582 of 895 Table F.7 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Without Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment CIP Ranking and Number Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table 4 Red Area Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace Observed Surcharged Conditio TOTAL Coll -1 SUM of Reach 8-75-8-57 144 0 38 0 0 38 Coll -2 SUM of Reach 8-50-8-52 213 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 15 8 10 33 Coll -3 SUM of Reach 8-58-8-57 657 0 30 0 0 30 Coll -4 SUM of Reach 17-61-17-84 484 Increase 24" to 36" F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -5 SUM of Reach 8-265-8-266 438 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -6 Metro SUM of Reach 17-47-17-48 500 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -7 Metro SUM of Reach 17-48-17-59 506 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -8 Metro SUM of Reach 17-60-17-61 179 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -9 Metro SUM of Reach 17-84-17-85 457 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -10 Metro SUM of Reach 17-85-17-86 111 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -11 Metro SUM of Reach 17-86-17-87 43 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -12 Metro SUM of Reach 17-87-17-88 35 Increase 24" to 36" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 20 30 Coll -13 SUM of Reach 9-224-9-202 591 Increase 8" to 15" F.5 10 10 0 10 30 Coll -14 Coll -15 Coll -16 SUM of Reach SUM of Reach 8-244-8-243 12-75-8-14 305 349 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 10 10 0 20 20 30 30 28 Coll -17 SUM of Reach 11-8-11-7 207 0 26 0 0 26 Coll -18 SUM of Reach 12-143-12-142 475 0 25 0 0 25 Coll -19 SUM of Reach 13-53-9-212 325 0 25 0 0 25 Coll -20 SUM of Reach 8-249-8-265 98 0 3 0 0 20 23 Coll -21 SUM of Reach 12-109-12-110 319 0 20 0 0 20 Coll -22 SUM of Reach 8-332-8-331 144 0 20 0 0 20 Coll -23 Roots 8-246-8-24 180 0 0 0 0 20 20 Coll -24 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 16-128-16-129 252 Increase 24" to 36" F.3 0 0 10 10 20 Coll -25 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 12-73-12-75 247 Increase 8 to 12" F.3 and F.5 0 0 10 10 20 Coll -26 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 16-133-16-134 379 Increase 24" to 36" F.3 and F.5 0 0 10 10 20 Coll -27 SUM of Reach 8-243-8-242 305 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 10 0 10 20 Coll -28 SUM of Reach 8-280-8-281 371 Increase 15" LUZ1" F.5 0 10 0 10 20 Coll -29 Coll -30 Coll -31 ISUM of Reach urcnarge Observed Surcharge 1-55-1-52 8-245-8-246 1 297 173 0 0 20 0 20 20 20 20 20 Coll -32 Observed Surcharge 8-247-8-248 71 20 20 Coll I Observed Surcharge 8-248-8-249 147 20 20 Coll -34 SUM of Reach 12-84A-12-83 189 0 5 14 0 19 Coll -35 SUM of Reach 12-101-12-95 406 0 5 14 0 19 Coll -36 SUM of Reach 12-49-12-50 220 0 8 10 0 18 Coll -37 SUM of Reach 13-22-13-22A 247 0 18 0 0 18 Coll -38 SUM of Reach 8-6813-8-68 217 0 17 0 0 17 Coll -39 SUM of Reach 12N-79-13-65B 109 0 3 14 0 17 Coll -40 SUM of Reach 8-107-8-106 201 0 10 6 0 16 Coll -41 SUM of Reach 7-79-7-80 419 0 15 0 0 15 Coll -42 SUM of Reach 8-285-8-284 319 0 15 0 0 15 Coll -43 SUM of Reach 8-51-8-50 150 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 5 0 10 15 Coll -44 SUM of Reach 8-281-8-282 281 Increase 15" to 21" F.5 0 5 0 10 15 Coll 45 Metro SUM of Reach 17-78-17-82 266 Longitudinal - Wider (8" -12") F.2 and F.5 0 5 0 10 15 Coll -46 SUM of Reach 12-126-12-125 443 0 15 0 0 15 Coll -47 SUM of Reach 7-9-7-10 304 0 14 0 0 14 Packet Page 583 of 895 Coll -48 SUM of Reach 12-134-12-132 159 0 14 0 0 14 Coll -49 SUM of Reach 12-132-12-131 129 0 14 0 0 14 Coll -50 SUM of Reach 9-299-9-298 145 0 3 10 0 13 Coll -51 SUM of Reach 14-56-14-62 406 Increase 12" to 18" F.5 0 3 0 10 13 Coll -52 SUM of Reach 12-248-12-247 128 0 13 0 0 13 Coll -53 SUM of Reach 8-136-8-137 401 0 12 0 0 12 Coll -54 SUM of Reach 9-363A-9-363 318 0 12 0 0 12 Coll -55 SUM of Reach 14-3-14-3A 105 0 9 3 0 12 Coll -56 SUM of Reach 2-113A-2-113 336 0 11 0 0 11 Coll -57 SUM of Reach 12-133-12-134 197 0 0 10 0 10 Coll -58 SUM of Reach 14-66-14-65 348 0 10 0 0 10 Coll -59 SUM of Reach 14-34-14-33 328 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -60 SUM of Reach 8-4-8-5 262 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -61 SUM of Reach 8-135-8-316 96 5 5 0 0 10 Coll -62 SUM of Reach 9-20-9-19 268 Increasci 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -63 SUM of Reach 9-11-9-10 268 Increase 10" to 15" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -64 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 8-35-8-36 287 Increase 10" to 15" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -65 SUM of Reach 1-36A-1-36 214 0 0 10 0 10 Coll -66 SUM of Reach 8-114-8-113 269 0 0 10 0 10 Coll -67 SUM of Reach 8-240-8-239 336 0 10 0 0 10 Coll -68 SUM of Reach 8-59-8-58 148 0 10 0 0 10 Coll -69 Metro SUM of Reach 14-48-14-50 130 Increase 10" to 15" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -70 Metro SUM of Reach 17-88-17-89 19 Increase 24" to 36" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -71 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 7-47-7-50 187 Increase 12" to 18" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -72 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 7-48-7-47 166 Increase 12" to 18" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -73 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 8-34-8-35 334 Increase 10" to 15" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -74 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 9-193-9-196 128 Increase 10" to 15" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -75 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 9-19-9-18 50 Increase 10" to 15" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -76 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 9-201-9-202 280 Increase 10" to 15" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -77 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 9-202-9-20 299 Increase 10" to 15" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -78 SUM of Reach 4-163-4-162 295 Increase 10" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -79 SUM of Reach 9-188-9-189 174 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -80 SUM of Reach 14-65-14-64 175 0 0 10 0 10 Coll -81 SUM of Reach 7-50-7-52 159 0 10 0 0 10 Coll -82 SUM of Reach 8-41-8-42 332 Increase 8" to 15" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -83 SUM of Reach 8-2-8-2A 197 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -84 SUM of Reach 8-2A-8-3 134 Increase 8" to 12" F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -85 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 11-19-11-18 526 Increase from 24 to 42 F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -86 SUM of Reach 3-12F-3-12E 116 0 0 10 0 10 Coll -87 SUM of Reach 8-97-8-98 186 0 10 0 0 10 Coll -88 Lift Station 1 SUM of Reach 4-83-4-82 150 Increase 10" to 12" FA and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 Coll -89 Edmonds WWTP SUM of Reach 7-33-7-32 441 Increase 30" to 42" F.1 and F.5 0 0 0 10 10 WWTP Hole in Pipe - Large 12-105M-12-105 1 F. 0 0 10 0 10 wEdmonds Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-181-12-182 0 F. 0 0 10 0 10 EdmondsWWTP Pipe Repair 12-42-12-43 0 F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-57-12-58 0IF F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 12-71-12-73 0 F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 13-65A-12-7 0 F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Metro Pipe Repair 14-73-14-72 0 F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Metro Pipe Repair 16-27-16-31 0 F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Lift Station 12 Pipe Repair 1-79-1-78 8 F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Lift Station 4 Hole in Pipe - Large 2-6413-2-68 0 F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Lynnwood WWTP Pipe Repair 3-65-3-66A 0 F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Edmonds WWTP Pipe Repair 7-3913-7-39C 0 F.3 0 0 10 0 10 Storm Lines Pipe Repair 8-322 0 F.3adi 0 0 10 0 10 Packet Page 584 of 895 Table F.8 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Red Area Granite O&M Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace TOTAL Granite O&M SUM of Reach 8-58-8-57 0 176 30 0 0 206 176 SUM of Reach 8-77-8-76 0 44 5 0 0 49 44 SUM of Reach 8-50-8-52 0 34 15 8 0 57 34 SUM of Reach 8-68-8-68A 0 31 8 0 0 39 31 SUM of Reach 7-79-7-80 0 30 15 0 0 45 30 SUM of Reach 8-76-8-75 0 29 5 0 0 34 29 SUM of Reach 17-61-17-84 0 28 0 0 0 28 28 SUM of Reach 7-78-7-79 0 28 0 0 0 28 28 SUM of Reach 5-267-5-261 0 25 0 0 0 25 25 SUM of Reach 8-3-84 0 24 0 0 0 24 24 SUM of Reach 5-260-5-344 0 23 5 0 0 28 23 SUM of Reach 8-52-8-59 0 23 0 0 0 23 23 SUM of Reach 5-261-5-260 0 22 5 0 0 27 22 SUM of Reach 13-21A-13-21 0 19 3 0 0 22 19 SUM of Reach 4-60-4-62 0 19 0 0 0 19 19 SUM of Reach 8-UNK 1-8-330A 0 19 0 0 0 19 19 SUM of Reach 10-27-10-28 0 18 0 0 0 18 18 SUM of Reach 8-182-8-179 0 18 0 0 0 18 18 SUM of Reach 8-73-8-74 0 17 0 0 0 17 17 SUM of Reach 12-133-12-134 0 16 0 10 0 26 16 SUM of Reach 14-66-14-65 0 16 10 0 0 26 16 SUM of Reach 12-1-8-1 0 16 0 0 0 16 16 SUM of Reach 13-4-14-49 0 16 0 0 0 16 16 SUM of Reach 14-67-14-66 0 16 0 0 0 16 16 SUM of Reach 17-23-17-39 0 16 0 0 0 16 16 SUM of Reach 8-21A-8-51 0 16 0 0 0 16 16 SUM of Reach 7-9-7-10 0 15 14 0 0 29 15 SUM of Reach 8-78-8-77 0 15 3 4 0 22 15 SUM of Reach 7-37-7-36 0 15 5 0 0 20 15 SUM of Reach 7-43-7-40 0 15 0 0 0 15 15 SUM of Reach 7-61-7-60 0 15 0 0 0 15 15 SUM of Reach 7-81-7-82 0 15 0 0 0 15 15 SUM of Reach 8-178-8-177A 0 15 0 0 0 15 15 SUM of Reach 8-31-8-30 0 15 0 0 0 15 15 SUM of Reach 8-136-8-137 0 14 12 0 0 26 14 SUM of Reach 7-34-7-30 0 14 5 0 0 19 14 SUM of Reach 4-78-8-244 0 14 0 0 0 14 14 SUM of Reach 5-33413-5-334A 0 14 0 0 0 14 14 SUM of Reach 7-66-8-327 0 14 0 0 0 14 14 SUM of Reach 7-83-7-84 0 14 0 0 0 14 14 SUM of Reach 8-269-8-267 0 14 0 0 0 14 14 SUM of Reach 8-54-8-56 0 14 0 0 0 14 14 SUM of Reach 8-59A-8-59 0 13 9 0 0 22 13 SUM of Reach 14-34-14-33 0 13 0 0 0 13 13 SUM of Reach 8-18-8-55 0 13 0 0 0 13 13 SUM of Reach 11-8-11-7 0 12 26 0 0 38 12 SUM of Reach 11-9A-7-35 0 12 0 0 0 12 12 SUM of Reach 8-4-8-5 0 12 0 0 0 12 12 SUM of Reach 8-60-8-59A 0 12 0 0 0 12 12 SUM of Reach 8-87-8-86 0 12 0 0 0 12 12 SUM of Reach 7-46-7-47 0 11 5 0 0 16 11 SUM of Reach 12-54-12-53 0 11 0 0 0 11 11 SUM of Reach 9-109-8-193 0 11 0 0 0 11 11 Packet Page 585 of 895 Table F.8 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Red Area Granite O&M Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace TOTAL Irani.Problem SUM of Reach 12-84A-12-83 0 10 5 14 0 29 10 SUM of Reach 8-112-8-117 0 10 5 0 0 15 10 SUM of Reach 12-121-12-119 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 12-123-12-121 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 12-13-12-14 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 12-14-12-15 0 10 0 0 0 101 10 SUM of Reach 12-156-12-155 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 12-87-12-86 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 13-166A-13-166 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 13-81A-13-81B 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 14-7L-14-7B 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 5-156-5-151 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 7-56-7-55 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 8-167-8-165 0 10 0 0 0 101 10 SUM of Reach 8-257-8-257A 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 8-291A-8-291 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 8-298-8-297 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 8-329A-8-329 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 8-5-8-6 0 10 0 0 0 10 10 SUM of Reach 8-135-8-316 5 9 5 0 0 19 9 SUM of Reach 8-155-8-352 0 9 0 0 0 9 9 SUM of Reach 9-347-9-348 0 9 0 0 0 91 9 SUM of Reach 9-363A-9-363 0 8 12 0 0 20 8 SUM of Reach 3-66E-3-66D 0 8 3 3 0 14 8 SUM of Reach 9-262A-9-262 0 8 5 0 0 13 8 SUM of Reach 5-42-5-41 0 8 0 3 0 11 8 SUM of Reach 12-28-8-2 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 13-157-13-156 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 13-56-13-57 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 3-94-3-93 0 8 0 0 0 81 8 SUM of Reach 5-325-5N-11 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 5-7-5-8 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 8-197-8-199 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 8-70-8-71 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 8-99-8-316 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 9-175-9-177 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 9-20-9-19 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 9-314-9-366 0 8 0 0 0 81 8 SUM of Reach 9-364-9-363 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 SUM of Reach 9-150-5-336 0 7 5 0 0 12 7 SUM of Reach 8-203-8-202 0 7 0 4 0 11 7 SUM of Reach 12-175-12-146 0 7 0 0 0 7 7 SUM of Reach 16-106-16-110 0 7 0 0 0 7 7 SUM of Reach 16-59-16-60 0 7 0 0 0 7 7 SUM of Reach 4-131-4-100 0 7 0 0 0 7 7 SUM of Reach 4-134-4-133 0 7 0 0 0 71 7 SUM of Reach 8-291-8-283 0 7 0 0 0 7 7 SUM of Reach 8-43-8-44 0 7 0 0 0 7 7 SUM of Reach 8-107-8-106 0 6 10 6 0 22 6 SUM of Reach 9-299-9-298 0 6 3 10 0 19 6 SUM of Reach 11-6-11-5 0 6 8 0 0 14 6 SUM of Reach 12-95-12-94 0 6 5 0 0 11 6 SUM of Reach 8-72-8-73 0 6 5 0 0 11 6 SUM of Reach 12-246-12-243 0 6 3 0 0 9 6 Packet Page 586 of 895 Table F.8 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Red Area Granite O&M Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace TOTAL Irani.Problem SUM of Reach 12-135-12-134 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 12-160-12-149 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 12-208-12-207 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 12-287-12-286 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 16-37-16-38 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 2-27-2-25 0 6 0 0 0 61 6 SUM of Reach 4-30-4-28 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 5-14-5-15 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 Lynnwood WWTP 203-5-201 N/A F.1 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 5-74-5-72 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 8-265-8-266 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 8-55-8-55A 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 9-11-9-10 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 9-26213-9-262A 0 6 0 0 0 61 6 SUM of Reach 9-273-9-274 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 9-287-9-286 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 SUM of Reach 12-143-12-142 0 5 25 0 0 30 5 SUM of Reach 12-109-12-110 0 5 20 0 0 25 5 SUM of Reach 8-332-8-331 0 5 20 0 0 25 5 SUM of Reach 8-285-8-284 0 5 15 0 0 20 5 SUM of Reach 1-36A-1-36 0 5 0 10 0 15 5 SUM of Reach 8-114-8-113 0 5 0 10 0 151 5 SUM of Reach 8-240-8-239 0 5 10 0 0 15 5 SUM of Reach 8-59-8-58 0 5 10 0 0 15 5 SUM of Reach 2-29-2-28 0 5 5 4 0 14 5 SUM of Reach 7-35-7-33B 0 5 5 4 0 14 5 SUM of Reach 8-71-8-72 0 5 9 0 0 14 5 SUM of Reach 10-6-10-5 0 5 8 0 0 13 5 SUM of Reach 14-29-14-28 0 5 8 0 0 13 5 SUM of Reach 12-139-12-138 0 5 5 0 0 101 5 SUM of Reach 12-16-12-17 0 5 5 0 0 10 5 SUM of Reach 2-91-2-90 0 5 5 0 0 10 5 SUM of Reach 7-65-7-66 0 5 5 0 0 10 5 SUM of Reach 8-101A-8-100 0 5 5 0 0 10 5 SUM of Reach 11-23A-11-21 0 5 0 4 0 9 5 SUM of Reach 12-10513-12-105A 0 5 3 0 0 8 5 SUM of Reach 4-1964-200 0 5 3 0 0 8 5 SUM of Reach 5-135-5-134 0 5 3 0 0 81 5 SUM of Reach 7-49-7-49A 0 5 3 0 0 8 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 11-2-11-7 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 11-21A-11-21 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 11-7-11-9 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-111-12-68 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-119-12-117 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-124-12-123 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-125-12-123 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-127-12-125 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-129-12-127 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-137-12-136 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-144-12-146 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 12-144-12-146 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-147-12-148 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 12-148-12-141 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 12-151A-12-151 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Packet Page 587 of 895 Table F.8 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Red Area Granite O&M Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace TOTAL Granite O&M Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-154-12-153 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-17-12-18 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-209-12-207 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 12-2-12-1 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-46-12-46A N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-47-12-49 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-5-12-2 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-6-12-5 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-69-12-67 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 12-74-12-73 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-90-12-87 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 12-94A-12-94 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 12-98-12-96 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 13-146-13-145 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 13-87-13-88 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 12 Problem Laterals - Connections 1-39-1-38 N/A F.1 Lateral Bloc 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 13-99-13-98 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 14-47-14-48 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Metro Problem Laterals -Connections 14-70-14-69 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 15-3C-15-3B N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Metro Problem Laterals - Connections 16-99-16-102 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 51 5 Lift Station 12 Problem Laterals - Connections 1-9-1-9A N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 4 Problem Laterals - Connections 2-131-2-132 N/A F.1 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 3-130-3-129 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 3-157-3-156 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 4-110-4-109 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-119-4-121 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-13-4-42 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-171-4-173A N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 3 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-58-4-59 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 3 Problem Laterals - Connections 4-62-4-63 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-113-5-111 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-137-5-136 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 5-160-5-159 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 5-239-5-238 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-24OB-5-240A N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 9 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-309-5-304 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lynnwood WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 5-324-5-324A N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-55-5-54 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-67-5-66 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-81-5-80 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-87-5-86 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 10 Problem Laterals - Connections 5-88G-5-88E N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-59-7-57 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 7-60-7-56 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-69-7-70 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Edmonds WWTP Problem Laterals - Connections 7-80-7-61 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-150-8-149 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-160-8-159 N/A F.1 Lateral Bloc 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-163-8-162 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-165-8-164 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-172A-8-172 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Lift Station 1 Problem Laterals - Connections 8-183-8-182 N/A F.1 Connection 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 SUM of Reach 8-188B-8-188A 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 Packet Page 588 of 895 Granite O&M 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Packet Page 589 of 895 Gra.. e O&M 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Packet Page 590 of 895 Grarn e O&M 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Packet Page 591 of 895 Gran e O&M 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Packet Page 592 of 895 Table F.8 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment Problem Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Red Area Granite O&M Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace TOTAL Gram e O&M SUM of Reach 5-195-5-195A 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Lynnwood WWTP Medium Root Problem 5-217-5-216 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 5-281A-5-278 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Lift Station 9 Medium Root Problem 5-317-5-316 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Lift Station 9 Medium Root Problem 5-330E-5-330D 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 5-38-5-39 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 5-79-5-70 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Lift Station 10 Medium Root Problem 5-88A-5-88B 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Edmonds WWTP N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 7-64-7-62 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 7-86-7-87A 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-101 B-8-1 01 A 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-13-8-21A 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-172J-8-172F 0 2 0 0 0 21 2 Lift Station 1 Medium Root Problem 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Edmonds WWTP Problem Joint - Offset Medium 8-18A-8-18 N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-193-8-192 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Lift Station 1 m 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-21-8-21A 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-2-8-2A 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-288-8-287 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-2A-8-3 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-316-8-135 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-317-8-316 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-324-7-68 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 8-44-8-45 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Lift Station 1 IMedium Root Problem 9-111-8-189D 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Edmonds WWTP I Problem Joint - Offset Medium 9-184-9-185 N/A F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Edmonds WWTP IMedium Root Problem 9-185-9-186 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 Edmonds WWTP I Medium Root Problem 9-222A-9-227 0 F.1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 9-84-9-83 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 SUM of Reach 2-113A-2-113 0 1 11 0 0 12 1 SUM of Reach 3-12F-3-12E 0 1 0 10 0 11 1 SUM of Reach 8-97-8-98 0 1 10 0 0 11 1 SUM of Reach 8-85K-8-85F 0 1 6 0 0 7 1 SUM of Reach 12-226-12-225 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 SUM of Reach 12-71-12-89 0 1 5 0 0 61 1 SUM of Reach 16-9-16-8 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 SUM of Reach 3-131-3-132 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 SUM of Reach 4-524-52A 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 SUM of Reach 5-299-5-300 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 SUM of Reach 8-281-8-282 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 SUM of Reach 9-117-9-116 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 SUM of Reach 9-264-9-266 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 SUM of Reach 4-115-8-219H 0 1 0 4 0 51 1 SUM of Reach 8-162-8-161 0 1 0 4 0 5 1 SUM of Reach 13-8E-13-166A 0 1 3 0 0 4 1 SUM of Reach 3-109H-3-109G 0 1 3 0 0 4 1 SUM of Reach 4-1414-142 0 1 3 0 0 4 1 SUM of Reach 8-249-8-265 0 1 3 0 0 4 1 SUM of Reach 9-276-9-277 1 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 4 1 Miscellaneous M SE Comer of Hwy 99 and 224th St can Flume 14 F.1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 Miscellaneous M 22304 Hwy 99 lean F 1 14 F.1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 Packet Page 593 of 895 Packet Page 594 of 895 Packet Page 595 of 895 Packet Page 596 of 895 Table F.8 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Red Area Granite O&M Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace TOTAL Irani.Problem SUM of Reach 12-51-8-11 0 0 5 3 0 8 0 BREACH Lift Station 4 m Hole in Pipe - Sall 2-89-2-88 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 4-186-4-185 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 5-269-5-267 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 8-202-8-201 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Hole in Pipe - Small 9-80A-9-80 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Hole in Pipe - Small INLET-7-61 0 SMALL F.2 0 0 8 0 0 81 0 BREACH Lift Station 12 Deformed 1-11-1-15 0 F.3 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 SUM of Reach 12-105N-12-105M 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 SUM of Reach 13-113-13-112 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 SUM of Reach 4-52A-4-53 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 SUM of Reach 5-246-5-245 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 SUM of Reach 8-175-8-174 0 0 3 3 0 6 0 1048 Walnut Street Grit (a lot) 8-2A-8-2 205 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 SUM of Reach 8-2D-8-2B 0 0 6 0 0 61 0 942 Alder Street Grit (a lot) 8-30-8-31 275 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 61 0 10th at Alder Street Grit (a lot) 8-31-8-32 336 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 61 0 Alder St at Yost Park Grit (a lot) 8-328-8-2 265 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 61 0 1053 Alder Street Grit (a lot) 8-32A-8-32B 55 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 61 0 10th Ave South at Walnut St Grit (a lot) 8-4-8-3 335 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 61 0 935 Walnut Street Grit (a lot) 8-5-8-4 260 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 61 0 8620 Maplewood Lane Grit (a lot) 9-139-9-137 155 Conc F.1 6 0 0 0 0 61 0 BREACH Metro Crack 10-10-10-7 1 Multiple -Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 7122 210th Street Grease 10-23-10-25 5 0 0 0 5 0 SUM of Reach 11-1-11-2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-1A-7-39A 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 11-3-11-2 0 Circular- Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 23 216th Street Black Water 12- 6-13-96 380 F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 153 8th Ave S. Grit, Black Water 12-189-12-190 c/o 120 Con F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 1115 8th Ave S. Grit, Black Water 12-191-12-189 285 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 51 0 36 Fir Street Black Water 12-192-1 9-1 Q1 200 one F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-196-12-198 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-24-12-23 2 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-249-12-248 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-37-12-38 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-55-12-56 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 12-8-12-6 1 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Metro Crack 13-20-13-15 0 Longitudinal -Wider F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 16131 75th Place West Grease 1-36-1-36A 211 F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 21808 Highway 99 Black Water 14-22-14-24 360 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 21309 76th Ave W (Drop MH) Grit, Black Water 14-40-9-254 330 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 215th At 72nd Black Water 14-6-14-7 260 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 74th at228th St Grease 14-65-14-66 320 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 72nd Ave W. at 215th St Black Water 14-7A-14-7B 255 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Metro Crack 16-103-16-106 1 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 51 0 240th at 78th Ave W Black Water 16-76-16-77 160 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 240th St and 78th Ave W Grit, Black Water 16-77-16-65 275 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Metro Crack 17-31-17-28 1 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Metro Crack 17-63-17-64 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 23819 76th Ave W Black Water 17-72-Main 44 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 23821 76th Ave Grease 17-73-17-69 232 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Metro Crack 17-78-17-82 0 Longitudinal - Wider F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 76th Ave W. at 242nd St Black Water 17-81-17-80 360 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 24122 76th Ave W Black Water 17-82-17-81 105 Conc F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 Packet Page 597 of 895 Table F.8 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Red Area Granite O&M Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace TOTAL Iran..Problem BREACH Lift Station 4 Crack 2-83-2-82 0 Longitudinal - Wider F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lynnwood WWTP Crack 3-10913-3-109A 0 Circular -Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lynnwood WWTP Crack 3-1 H-3-3A2 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 7117 176th St. SW Dirt, Grease, Grit 3-93-3-94 150 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Crack 4-124-4-123 0 Circular - Wider F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Crack 4-217A-4-217 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 Dellwood Dr. at 78th Ave W lack Water 5-191-5-187 200 one F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Crack 5-263-5-262 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lift Station 9 Crack 5-299-5-300 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lynnwood WWTP Crack 5-319-5-320 0 Circular -Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 7601 OVID Postffice Grit -- 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 18209 76th Ave West Grit 5-325-5-511-11 80 Con F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 Admiral Way at Dayton Grease 7-11-7-10 80 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 51 0 Admiral Way Grease 7-3-7-2 425 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 51 0 Admiral Way Grease 7-4-7-3 380 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 Admiral Way Grease 7-5-7-4 380 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 Admiral Way Grease 7-6-7-5 280 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 Admiral Way at West Dayton Grit 7-6-CO 125 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Crack 7-75-7-74 1 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 Admiral Way at Dayton Grease 7-7-7-11 37 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 Admiral Way Grease 7-7-7-6 35 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Crack 8-189-8-194 0 Spiral - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 51 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Crack 8-206-8-205 0 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 51 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Crack 8-219H-8-219G 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 51 0 BREACH Lift Station 1 Crack 8-286-8-285 0 Multiple - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 BREACH a nu StreetGrit Edmonds WWTP Crack 8-74-8-75 4 Multiple -Narrow 1 F.2 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 7th Ave at Edmonds St Black Water 8-99-8-101A 207 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 PROBLEM JOINTS Lift Station 1 Infiltration in the Joint 9-136-9-136A N/A Medium F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 8705 Maplewood Lane Grit, Black Water 9-137-9-138 340 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 8610 Main Street Grit 9-16-9-19 178 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 PROBLEM JOINTS Lift Station 1 1 Infiltration in the Joint 9-170-9-172 N/A Light F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 8610 Main Street Pine Ridge Park Black Water Black Water 9-19-9-20 9-202-9-201+ 56 165 Cone Cone F.1 F.1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 Bpind Ridge Park Black Water 9-202-9-224 503 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 Pine Ridge Park Black Water 9-20-9-202 430 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 76th at 212th Street S.W. Grease 9-254-9-255 305 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Crack 9-274-9-275 0 Circular - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 7703 203 Street SW Grit 9-314-9-313 310 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Lift Station 9 Crack 9-326-9-327 1 Longitudinal - Narrow F.2 0 0 5 0 0 51 0 7804 200th Street Black Water 9-347-9-346 130 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 7907 200th Street (Drop MH) Black Water 9-348-9-347 400 Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 7726 202 Place Grit, Black Water 9-366-9-314 350 M Cone F.1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 12-178-12-179 0 F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-212-12-211 0 F.3 1 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Broken 12-269C-12-269D 0 Soil Visible - Large F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 BREACH Metro Broken 13-14-13-13 0 F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 BREACH Metro Broken 14-28-14-27 0 Soil Visible - Large F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Broken 15-4E-15-4C 0 Soil Visible - Small F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 BREACH Lift Station 3 Broken Hole 4-75-4-74 0 F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Broken Hole 7-39C-7-40 0 F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 BREACH Edmonds WWTP Broken 8-22-8-21 0 Soil Visible - Medium F.3 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 Packet Page 598 of 895 Grarn e O&M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Packet Page 599 of 895 Table F.8 Composite Capital Improvement Projects - Granite O&M Only Ranking and Point Assignment Category Location Reason Manhole # Distance of Run ft Comments Table CIP No. Red Area Granite O&M Granite - Trechless Granite - Dig up and Replace TOTAL Irani.Problem Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-34-4-36 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-39-4-41 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUM of Reach 4-72A-4-72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-83-4-82 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 4-98-4-97 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lynnwood WWTP Debris and Deposits 5-164-5-163 N/A F.1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8015 196th St SW 5-334A CO to main 60 PVC F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 7-33-7-32 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 7-39A-7-39B N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 Debris and Deposits 8-291 B-8-291A N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7th Ave at Sprague St None 8-316-8-99 290 Conc F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7th at Edmonds St None 8-99-8-98 102 Conc F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Metro Debris and Deposits 9-247-9-248 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edmonds WWTP Debris and Deposits 9-272-9-271 N/A F.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lift Station 1 IDebris and Deposits 9-62-9-61 1 N/A I I F.1 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 Packet Page 600 of 895 APPENDIX G Sewer Service Agreements G.1 Agreement for Wastewater Treatment, Disposal and Transport services — City of Edmonds, City of Mountlake Terrace and Olympic View Water and Sewer District — May 17, 1988 G.2 Agreement between City of Edmonds and Municipality of Seattle —July 20, 1988 G.3 Agreement between City of Edmonds and King County — October 6, 2000 G.4 Agreement between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood — October 26, 1982 G.5 Agreement between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood — November 19, 1987 G.6 Agreement between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood — May 4, 1990 G.7 Agreement between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood — August 15, 2011 Packet Page 601 of 895 G.1 Agreement for Wastewater Treatment, Disposal and Transport services — City of Edmonds, City of Mountlake Terrace and Olympic View Water and Sewer District — May 17, 1988 Packet Page 602 of 895 AGRMlENT FOR V/VASTEVRTER TREATME U, DISPOSAL AM TRANSPOPT SERVICES By and Among THE CITY OF EDMONDS THE CITY OF MOUNILAKE TERRACE I� 31' + ►I! 3�t 1�JIC IL' M RONALD SEWER DISTRICT May 17, 1988 Packet Page 603 of 895 TABLE OF CONTLI'S Page Section 1 Definitions 3 Section 2 Management of the Project 9 Section 3 Financing of the Project 9 3.1 Cost of the Project 9 3.2 Allocation of Project Costs 10 and Plant Capacity 3.3 Grant Funding 11 3.4 Payment of the Participant's 11 Share of Project Costs 3.5 Bond issuance 12 Section 4 Upgrading or Expanding the Facilities 13 Section 5 Sewage Treatment 13 5.1 Availability of Capacity 13 5.2 Capacity Limit 14 5.3 Notification of Nearing Capacity Limit 15 5.4 Transfer of Capacity 15 5.4.1 Cost of Capacity Transfer 16 5.4.2 Alternative Costs of Capacity Transfer 16 5.4.3 Sharing in Capacity Transfers 17 5.4.4 Temporary Capacity Transfer 17 5.5 Treatment of Domestic Sewage Only 17 5.6 Sewage Quality 18 5.7 Pre -Treatment Ordinances 18 Section 6 Operation, Treatment and Quality of the 19 Packet Page 604 of 895 Facilities and the Participant's Internal System 6.1 Operation and Maintenance 19 of the Facilities 6.2 Reporting Requirements 20 6.3 The Participant's Internal System 21 6.4 Ballinger Lift Station and Related 23 Facilities 6.5 Joint Use of Collection Systems Owned by One 25 Party. 6.6 Charges and Procedures Related to Joint 25 Sewerage Areas of Olympic View Water and Sever District and the City of Edmonds Section 7 Payment for Maintenance, Operation, and Overhead 26 Costs for the Treatment of Domestic Sewage 7.1 Monthly Payments 26 7.2 Overhead Costs 27 7.3 Standby Maintenance Charge 28 7.4 Facilities Capital Improvements Fund 29 7.5 Participant's Rates and Sources of Payment 30 7.6 City Rates 31 7.7 Books and Accounts 31 Section 8 Oversight Committee 31 8.1 Establishment of Oversight ConTaittee 31 8.2 Oversight of Construction 32 8.3 Oversight of Operations and Maintenance 32 Section 9 Replacement Standards; Insurance 33 Packet Page 605 of 895 9.1 Replacement and Rehabilitation Standards 9.2 Insurance Section 10 Arbitration Section 11 Successors and Assigns Section 12 Amendment or Modification Section 13 Governing Laws Section 14 Number and Gender Section 15 Notice Section 16 Term Section 17 Memorandum of Understanding Exhibit A Allocated Capacity and Percentage Shares Exhibit B operations and Maintenance Costs -- Direct operations and Maintenance Costs -- Overhead Exhibit C Memorandum of Understanding Exhibit D Equivalent Customer Units Parameters Exhibit E Methodology for Cost Computation Related Capacity Transfer Exhibit F Exhibit G Service Area Map for 1988 Preliminary Project Cost Estimates 33 33 34 34 34 35 35 35 36 36 w 39 39 40 45 46 47 Packet Page 606 of 895 AGREEMENT FOR WASTEWATER TREATT1ENT, DISPOSAL, AND TRANSPORT SERVICES THIS AGREF1'1ENT is effective as of the 17th day of May, 1988, by and among the City of Mountlake Terrace, Olympic View Water and Sewer District, and Ronald Sewer District (the "Participants"), and the CITY OF EDMONDS (the "City") (collectively, the "Parties"), all municipal corporations of the State of Washington. WH19EAS, the City's wastewater treatment and disposal facilities (the "Facilities") are being upgraded to meet the discharge limitations of the City's current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System waste discharge permit; and WHEREAS, the City must improve the Facilities so that they will be in cc opliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations; and WHEREAS, the State of Washington has enforced both Federal and State statutes and in 1985 issued a Compliance Order and a Compliance Schedule to the City for the construction of secondary treatment facilities; and WHEREAS, the City desires to expand the capacity of the Facilities at the 2nd Avenue and Dayton Street site in order to meet current domestic wastewater treatuent needs of various public entities located Packet Page 607 of 895 in or near the City (collectively, the "Participants") and to provide projected ultimate treatment capacity for the City and the Participants as defined under "Allocated Capacity;" and WHEREAS, the Participants wish the City to assume the ownership and operation of certain transmission, metering, and pumping facilities, which are used jointly by scene or all of the Participants and the City; and WHEREAS, the Participant is one of several Participants served by the Facilities, and the Participant is to equitably share in the financing of the necessary improvements to the Facilities provided that the City reserves a portion of the capacity of the improved Facilities for the treatment of domestic wastewater from the Participant's service area; and WHEREAS, The City desires to plan and provide for the long-term capital and operational needs of the Facilities, which may include mandated technological and regulatory changes and increased capacity and space demands; and wHEREAS the Participants desire to be kept informed prior to and during the construction of improvements; to provide for a method of overseeing construction, operation, maintenance, and expansion of the facilities; and to provide a procedure for reviewing and commenting upon the Treatment Plant annual budgets; and - 2 - Packet Page 608 of 895 WHEREAS, the City and the Participants desire to provide for an integrated Industrial Pretreatment program within their respective service areas as required by DOE and/or EPA; and wEm:TAS, The City and the Participants executed a Memorandum of Understanding in 1987 setting forth a number of principles and expressing their intent to enter into this Agreement; NOW, TMREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises provided for herein, the Parties hereto for themselves, their assigns and successors in interest, agree as follows_ Section 1. Definitions. For the purpose of this Agreement, the following words shall have the following meanings unless another meaning is clearly intended: 1.1. "AADF" means annual average daily flow, and shall mean the total flow of domestic sewage in millions of gallons during a full calendar year divided by the number of days in such year, expressed in 1.2. "Allocated Capacity of Domestic SeIf means the maximum annual average daily flow (AADF) of Domestic Sewage that the Participant is authorized by this Agreement to transmit to the Facilities, measured in volume. Volume shall be measured by metered Domestic Sewage flow expressed in MGDs of AADF. A substitute for direct metering is to be used where co --mingled flows for small - 3 - Packet Page 609 of 895 numbers of users (under approximately 100 ECUs) described in Section 6.5 make direct measurement impractical. 1.3. "Capacity Limit" means the preceding 12 month AADF of any Party when it equals the Party's Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage. 1.4. "C�" means the City of Edmonds or its successor. 1.5. "Custcmer" means a "single family residence" and/or an "equivalent customer unit" (ECU), as defined below. I.G. "DOE" means the Washington State Department of Ecology, or its successor. 1.7. "Dcmestic Sewage" means sanitary wastes normally collected from residential establishments, and shall include coinnercial and industrial wastes of similar strength or quality, and other commercial and/or industrial wastes that are pre-treated in accordance with City and/or Participant requirements meeting DOE and EPA guidelines. Domestic Sewage shall exclude ground water, storm water, drain water and industrial wastes not pre-treated in accordance with City and/Participant requirements meeting [DOE and EPA guidelines. 1.8. "EPA" means the United States Environmental Protection Agency, or its successor. --4- Packet Page 610 of 895 1.9. ivalent Customer" Unit or "ECU" is a measure applied to a user of the sewerage system other than "single family residence." The numb--r of Equivalent Customer Units assigned to any such user (for example, an apartn-ent house, motel., school, hospital, nursing hone, and any other public or commercial establishment) shall be the numerical ratio of the monthly volume of wastewater contributed by such user to the monthly volume of wastewater contributed by a typical single family residence. Tb serve as a practicable basis for computing the number of ECU's contributing into the joint sewerage system --- when and if such a computation is necessary or desirable to either augment or replace a direct flow measurement -- a list of users and the corresponding "equivalent customer" ratings is attached in Exhibit D, and incorporated herein by reference. 1.10. "Facilities" means the City's wastewater treatment facilities as described in the City of Edmonds Engineering Report, dated September, 1986, as amended, and includes the effluent transmission pipe used by all Participants (Edmonds Way Trunk), the outfall, the diffuser, and, upon the completion of the Project, the Improvements. 1..11. "Flow" means the volume of sewage per unit of time. 1.12. rovements" means those improvements to the Facilities described in the City of Edmonds Facilities Plan, dated January, 1988, as amended, or engineering plans and specifications approved by DOE, EPA, and the City, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference, and approved change orders carried out in 5 Packet Page 611 of 895 accordance with the construction of the facilities required under this Agreement. 1.13. "Influent Point" means the point at which each Participant's Internal System connects to the Facilities. 1.14. "Internal System" means all sewer lines, pump stations and other sewer facilities upstream from the Influent Point owned and operated by each Participant, respectively. 1.15. "M®" means million gallons per day, referring to a rate of sewage flow. 1.16. "Maintenance and Operation Costs" means all direct costs and expenses incurred by the City in transporting and treating Domestic sewage through the Facilities, maintaining those Facilities, and administering a joint Industrial Pre -Treatment program. Maintenance and Operation costs are described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference . 1.17. "Memorandum of Understanding' means the agreement of that name between the City and the Participants executed in September, October and November, 1987, attached as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference. 1.18. "Monthly Maximum Flow" mans the total flow of sewage in millions of gallons divided by the total number of days in that ® 6 Packet Page 612 of 895 month during which the greatest volume of flow occurs, in any given calendar year, and is expressed in MGD. 1.19. "NPDES Permit" means a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit" granted to the City or to the Participant, as applicable, pursuant to chapter 90.48 RCW and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended. 1.20. "Other Facilities" means facilities other than the Treatment Plant, the outfall and diffuser, and the Edmonds Way Trunk, which are used by the City and one or more Participants to transmit, measure, and pump sewage. 1.21. "Overhead Costs" means the City's general administrative, supexvisory, and other indirect costs related to the operation and maintenance of the Facilities and Other Facilities. Overhead Costs shall be computed by the "step down" method. Overhead costs are described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. 1.22. "Oversight Ccamxittee" means the committee of that name established in Section 8 of this Agreement. 1.23. ."Parties" roans the City and the Participants. 1.24. "participant's Jurisdiction" means the service area within which the Participant is responsible for providing wastewater - 7 - Packet Page 613 of 895 collection services, depicted on Exhibit F, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. 1.25. "Project" means the Improvements and activities needed to implement it. 1.26. "Project Cost" means (1) the cost of preparing the planning studies and engineering plans and specifications for the Improvements; (2) the amounts paid to contractors for work performed under contracts for construction, installation and inspection of the Improvements; (3) the recorded pay and expenses of employees of the City directly related to the design, construction, installation and inspection of the Improvements, but not including any general City overhead; (4) the cost of materials, equipment and supplies directly related to the Improvements; (5) the cost of acquiring and condemning land, easements and rights -of -way for or related to the Improvements; (6) the cost of legal, engineering and other professional services related to the financing, planning, acquisition, construction, installation and inspection of the Improvements and to the resolving of any disputes or lawsuits related thereto, provided, however, that these costs are attributed to the project as a whole and not to the City's separate share; (7) the cost of obtaining necessary permits and franchises' (8) the cost of any reasonable expenses incurred by the City to mitigate the impact of the Facilities at the Dayton Street site upon the immediately surrounding neighborhood, including but not limited to expenses for landscaping, buffering, limited concealment of secondary clarifiers and street interfaces; (9) the cost of vacant land Packet Page 614 of 895 purchased by the City in 1984 for expansion of the secondary txeatny nt plant --- a sum of $137,462.06; and {10) other costs reasonably related to the planning, design, project administration, construction management, and general project management for the Improvements. 1.27. "Single Family Residence" means one structure, all connected and under the same roof, located on a lot or tract of real property having a separate and individual property description, with no other structure used for human occupancy located on that tract or lot, and which structure is used as a single family dwelling. Section 2. Management of the Project. The City shall, to the best of its ability, administer the planning, design, acquisition, construction and construction management of the Tmprovements and pay for the Project Cost thereof in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. The City shall use its best efforts to obtain permits and approvals necessary for construction, installation and inspection of the lmproven-e ts, and to secure grants from available sources. Section 3. Financing of the Project. 3. 1. Cost of the Pro Zect. The approximate Project Cost is estimated to be $39,500,000 . The exact cost of the Project will be determined by the City, acting reasonably, after construction, installation and acceptance of the Tmprovements. Should all bids or the contract price plus the total amount of all change orders exceed the estimated Project Cost, a bid award or any change order causing the Packet Page 615 of 895 estin-ated Project Cost to be exceeded shall be voted on by the Council of the City only after meaningful consultation with the legislative authority of each Participant, at a joint meeting to be called by the City. The City has entered into a Design Grant Agreement with the State for a maximum of $1.5 million. The City also expects to receive a grant and/or loan from either the State or the Federal Government in an amount equal to approximately 50% of eligible costs as defined by the respective programs. The City shall use its best efforts to obtain these grants. Interest earnings the City is permitted to retain on grant and loan proceeds shall be applied to the Project Cost and shall be treated as grant proceeds for the purpose of this Agreement. 3. 2. Allocation of Project Cost and Plant CaPacit . Part of the Project Cost may be financed from grants and/or loans. The remaining Project Cost shall be paid for by the City and the Participants in the proportionate shares of their respective Allocated Capacities of Domestic Sewage as follows: Allocated Capacity Of Domestic Project Cost Party Sewage (AADF) Contribution % Edmonds* 4.609 MGD 50.787% Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water District Ronald Sewer District 2.103 MGD 23.174% 1.502 MGD 16.551% -- 10 - Packet Page 616 of 895 TOTAL: 9.075 100.000% * Edwonds share includes separately contracted capacity for approximately 70 connections in the Town of Woodway, and separately contracted capacity for approximately 200 connections for Lynnwood. 3. 3. Grant Funding. The total amount of grant and/or loan proceeds, including any earned interest, available for the Project, whether received in a lt_unp sum or in installments over a period of time, or through a reduced interest rate loan program, shall be applied toward the reduction of the total Project Cost to be allocated among the Participants as described above. 3. 4. Pa t of the Participant's Share of Project Costs. Commencing November 2, 1987, each Participant shall pay to the City its proportionate share of previous eligible Project Costs paid by the City. Subsequently, the City shall sutnit to each Participant monthly invoices for eligible Project Cost and each Participant shall make every effort to make expeditious payment on the next available disbursement cycle. Documentation provided by the City in support of the preliminary Project Cost amounts shall be similar to documentation required for grant reimbursement. In the event that a Participant's payment is received more than 45 days after receipt of City's bill, the City shall be entitled to a late payment surcharge equal to the interest which the payment would have earned for the period in excess Packet Page 617 of 895 of 45 days, based on an interest rate typically used for municipal investing purposes. The Participant shall have the option to pay the balance of its share of the Project Costs in one lump sum on or before the date of the City's issuance of revenue bonds or notes (whichever occurs first), or in monthly payments during the design, construction and installation of the Improvements pursuant to monthly invoices of the City. The Participant's lump sum payn-ent shall be by check, draft or wire transfer in immediately available funds and shall be placed in an escrow account and withdrawn at such times and in such amounts as are determined by the City to be necessary to meet the obligations of the contract for construction and installation of the Improvements. All interest accumulated in an escrow account established in the City Treasury for each Participant shall be returned to the Participant or at the Participant's direction shall be applied to Participant's share of the Project Cost. If the Project Cost exceeds or is less than the estimate set forth in Section 3.1, the City shall at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice in writing assess or refund to the Participant for its share of that difference, and the Participant shall pay those assessments, if any, subject to the provisions of Section 3.1. 3. 5. Bond Issuance. The City and each Participant each retain its rights to issue bonds and other obligations in accordance with applicable law, but shall not act in such a manner as to impair the rights of the holders or owners of bonds issued by any other Party. 12 - Packet Page 618 of 895 Section 4. Upgrading or Expanding the Facilities. If the - City is further required by applicable laws or regulations to upgrade or expand the Facilities to provide a higher level of wastewater treatment or to modify the methods and/or locations of wastewater discharge, each Participant shall, if it desires to continue discharging Domestic Sewage into the Facilities, pay the Participant's proportionate share as set forth above of the cost of constructing such additional improvements and/or adding needed equipment, and acquiring land, whether by purchase or lease. The City may require the Participant to make payments on the same .basis as the Project Costs. The City and each Participant shall seek opportunities to minimize or avoid the cost of additional improvments through mutually agreeable modifications in the quantity and quality of Domestic Sewage discharge by the Participant. In lieu of paying for its share of the cost of constructing such additional improvements, any Participant may at its discretion discontinue discharge of Domestic Sewage into the Facilities, and then pay only those charges described in 7.3 of this Agreement. Section 5. Sewage Treatment. 5. 1. Availability of Ca cit . Until approximately April, 1991, when the City is scheduled to complete the Improvements, the City shall receive, transport and treat by means of the existing Facilities the domestic sewage discharged by each Participant up to the limits permitted by EPA and DOE. Upon completion of the Improvements, the City shall receive, transport and treat by means of the Facilities the -- 13 - Packet Page 619 of 895 Domestic Sewage discharged by the Participant up to the Participant's Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement (and/or in other agreements between Participants), a Participant shall not serve customers in another Participant's service area, subject to applicable laws and regulations. The City will provide this quantity of Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage as long as the Participant shall require it, barring events and circumstances which are beyond the City's control. However, this Agreement creates no obligation by the City beyond the term of this Agreement. 5. 2. Capacity Limit_ After construction of the Improvements, no Party may discharge into the Facilities any Domestic Sewage in amounts greater than its Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage, and the City may refuse to accept and treat any amounts an excess of any Party's Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage. If the City determines that the amount of the Party's Domestic Sewage is in excess of the Party's Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage, the Party shall pay, in addition to its ordinary charges described in Section 7.1, any extraordinary costs incurred by the City to treat the excess Domestic Sewage, as well as costs related to capital costs to treat and transport the excess capacity. Capital costs for treating sewage flows beyond the Capacity Limit or the Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage without prior arrangements such as described below, shall be charged according to the methodologies described in Section 5.4 on Transfers of Capacity, and shall be credited to each Party based on its Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage. The City shall account to any Party for its extraordinary costs. Any extraordinary costs collected by the City - 14 - Packet Page 620 of 895 from the Party shall be credited to the total Operation and Maintenance cost prior to apportionment of M & O costs to the other Parties that are within their respective Allocated Capacities of Domestic Sewage. The City's acceptance of excess amounts on any occasion or occasions shall not bind the City to accept excess Domestic Sewage amounts on any other occasion. When the AADF of the Party reaches 85 percent of the Party's Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage, the Party shall cone planning for treatment of its domestic sewage beyond its Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage. 5. 3. Notification of Nearjpg Cacity Limit When any Participant's flow reaches 85 percent of its Capacity Limit, the City shall notify it in writing. The Participant shall commence the preparation of plans to use its remaining Allocated Capacity and to provide for additional capacity beyond the Capacity Limit. The Participant shall be responsible for providing the City with information on proposed development which would increase its flows. 5. 4. Transfer of Capacity. If a Party desires to discharge greater amounts of Domestic Sewage into the Facilities than are allocated as set forth herein, it may request to purchase that additional capacity from any other Party with purchased capacity in the Facilities. If a Party determines that its Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage is excessive it may offer to sell such excess capacity to any other Participant. For the purposes of this Section 5 only, the Town of Woodway shall be considered a Party and shall be given the -- 15 Packet Page 621 of 895 opportunity to purchase capacity in the future. It is fully recognized by the City and the Participants that no Party is obligated in any way to transfer capacity -- temporary or permanent -- to any other Party. The willingness of any Party to enter into a transfer arrangement and the terms of such arrangement shall not be subject to review by the oversight Committee or to arbitration. The City shall be notified of all pending and final transfers of capacity and of all terms of such transfers in writing, and shall make this information available to all Participants. 5.4.1. Cost of Capacity Transfer. The cost of transferring such capacity shall be determined by the Future Value method which is based on the principle that the capacity purchaser should reimburse the capacity seller for all previous payments which the seller has made for the transferred capacity, and for the compounded costs of such payments as defined by an interest rate which the City or the Participant could have expected to receive by investing these payments. The interest rate shall be set by the capacity seller and shall be consistent with generally accepted public accounting principles. Exhibit E, attached and incorporated herein by reference, describes the methodology that would be used to derive the capacity transfer price at any future year. 5.4.2. Alternative Costs of Capacity Transfer. Any two Participants, or any Participant and the City, may agree to different terms than those described above and in the methodology in Exhibit E. - 16 - Packet Page 622 of 895 5.4.3. Sharing in Capacity Transfers. In the event that any two participants have agreed to a transfer of capacity on either cost basis above, the other Participants shall be given the opportunity to participate in the transfer if they agree to the transfer costs, and if sufficient capacity is available. 5.4.4. Tempor Ca cit Transfers. Temporary capacity transfers will be permitted, for a period not exceeding five years, from any Party having excess capacity to any Party needing capacity on the basis of any terms negotiated between those Parties. The Participants agreeing to a temporary capacity transfer shall notify the City of the terms of their arrangement, which shall include a plan for ending the temporary transfer by demonstrating howpermanent provisions ,are to be made. In no event may the the total Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage of the Parties after the transfer exceed the Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage of the Parties before the transfer. 5. 5. Treatment of Domestic Sewage Only. No Party shall discharge into the Facilities any wastewater other than Domestic Sewage. The City is obligated to treat only Domestic Sewage and may reject all other forms of wastewater. The City may refuse to transport and treat Domestic Sewage from those portions of any Participant's sewage collection system which do not conform to DOE and/or EPA standards for Domestic Sewage. -- 17 - Packet Page 623 of 895 5. 6. Sewage Quality. While there has historically been, and continues to be, a presumption that each Participant's and the City's sewage flows are predominantly domestic residential flows with reasonable, and approximately equivalent, levels of Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Suspended Solids (SS) levels, the Participants and the City shall be willing to address any changes in such presumptions. The Participants and the City shall cooperate to develop, as needed, ordinances and programs to mitigate BCD and SS levels which are higher than acceptable norms, as determined by either regulatory requirements or by generally accepted environmental practices. The costs of such programs, if and when undertaken, shall be directly applied to Parties responsible for the discharge of nonconforming wastewater and, unlike general Maintenance and Operation costs, shall not be based on overall sewage flow levels of the City and the Participant. 5. 7. Pre -Treatment Ordinances. If and when required to do so by EPA or DOE, or other applicable regulations and agreements, all the Parties shall adopt a Pre -Treatment Ordinance (or Resolution as may be appropriate) meeting all Federal and/or State requirements. The City shall be responsible for the acIninistration and operation of a pre --treatment program, if and when mandated. Administration and operation shall include, but not be limited to, developing procedures, forms, and instructions; categorizing dischargers; records keeping; compliance tracking; establishment of annual limits; sampling, testing, and monitoring; preparation of control documents; and preparation of permits. Each Participant shall be responsible within its jurisdiction Packet Page 624 of 895 for identification of dischargers, issuance of control documents, issuance of permits, and enforcement of ccupliance, and collection of any special fees, penalties, or other associated extraordinary charges. All City costs shall be included in the direct costs of Operation and Maintenance of the treatment plant. All the costs relating to the responsibilities of each Participant shall be absorbed by the Participant. Section 6, gperation, Treatment and Quality of the Facilities and the Participant's Internal System. 6. 1. Operation and Maintenance of the Facilities. The City shall own and shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the Facilities, both before and after construction of the Improvements, subject to the terms of this Agreement. The Facilities shall be operated and maintained in accordance with high engineering standards, and the standards established by the EPA, the DOE, the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services and other federal, state and local agencies. The quantity of Domestic Sewage discharged by a Participant into the Facilities shall be metered at the Influent Point, with the exception of co -mingled flows which will be accounted for by other generally accepted methods using either Equivalent Customer Units, directly measured water flows for winter months, or other methods approved by the Oversight Committee. The meter that measures the Participant's discharge of Domestic Sewage into the Facilities shall be calibrated by the City at least once each -- 19 - Packet Page 625 of 895 calendar year with the presence of any Participant that so desires, and may be inspected by either Party at the expense of such party at any time upon reasonable notice to the other. The City will continue to monitor other relevant variables such as water consumption by each Participant, rainfall, and other suitable variables, which will be used to provide redundancy for failed meters and an alternative method to check the validity and accuracy of the meter readings. The City and the Participants shall commission a separate engineering study to evaluate metering devices and practices so as to be able to install and properly operate the most suitable measurement and recording devices for the City's and the Participants' needs. 6. 2. Eep2rtjng Requirements. Each Participant shall provide the City with monthly reports of the number of sewer connections. The City skull monthly read, record and report the amount of Treasured Domestic Sewage, measured in MGD, discharged into the Facilities, accounted for by Participant. if a Participant is notified that it has reached 85 percent of its Capacity Limit, the Participant shall at least once every calendar quarter thereafter advise the City in writing of any governmental or private actions that will affect the volume and quality of the Participant's Domestic Sewage flow, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits, sewer permits, water permits and plat approvals, the adoption of land use and zoning ordinances or amendments thereto, and the execution of developer extension contracts. 20 Packet Page 626 of 895 The City shall periodically inspect its Facilities and the Participant shall periodically inspect its Internal System to ensure adherence to applicable standards and to minimize infiltration, enfiltration and deposits of rock or other debris. During construction of the Improvements and thereafter, the City and any Participant at any reasonable time may inspect the Internal System and the Facilities. 6. 3. The Partici ts- Internal System. Each Participant shall operate and maintain its Internal System at its sole expense, including all of its facilities as required to maintain the volume and quality of Domestic Sewage within the limits set forth in this Agreement. Each Participant shall observe the highest practicable standards and practices in the construction, operation, and maintenance of its Internal System with particular- attention to the following: (a) minimizing entry into the sewerage system of groundwater and/or surface water (I/I - infiltration and inflow); maintaining a favorable character and quality of Domestic Sewage in accordance with the standards set forth in Section 5.6, (b) eliminating septicity and objectionable odors, entry of petroleum wastes or other chemicals and/or wastes detrimental to sewer lines, pumping stations, the Facilities, and the waters of Puget Sound; and (c) maintaining an efficient and economical utility operation, while achieving optimum pollution and environmental control. Each Participant shall prevent, except for unusual circumstances to be reviewed and reconuended by the Oversight C m-nittee, the connection of any storm or drainage facilities to its Internal System. -21-- Packet Page 627 of 895 The City shall give written notice to the Participant of any condition within the Participant's Internal System that violates this Agreement or applicable laws, regulations or permits. If the Participant does not correct such condition within a reasonable time after the City gives written notice thereof, the Participant shall pay to the City any reasonable and necessary costs and expenses incurred by the City in connection with such condition. If the Participant discharges into the Facilities any solids, liquids, gases, toxic substances or other substances which the City reasonably believes is causing or will cause damage to the Facilities, or is creating a public nuisance or a hazard to life or property, the Participant shall either discontinue the discharge of such substances or pay for the costs of modifying the Facilities so that they are capable of satisfactorily handling such substances. Because substandard conditions of Domestic Sewage may cause serious damage to the Facilities, the Participant shall comply with any City order regarding the composition of Domestic Sewage, and after compliance may thereafter cause to be arbitrated the reasonableness of that order in accordance with Section 10. The Parties shall cooperate with each other to determine the source of possible violations of applicable law, regulations and permits (including applicable NPDES Permits). In the event the City is fined or otherwise penalized by local, State, or Federal agencies for failure to operate or maintain the Facilities in accordance with the requirements of the agencies, and it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City that such failure is due in whole or in part to the Participant's discharge of Domestic Sewage in violation of this Agreement, then the Participant shall pay its allocable share (as --22- Packet Page 628 of 895 determined by the parties or by an arbitrator in accordance with Section 10) of the costs of such fines or penalties, including its share of the associated administrative, legal and engineering costs incurred by the City in connection with the fines or penalties. 6. 4. Ballinger Lift Station and Related Facilities. The City, at its convenience, but no later than one year after completion of the Treatment Plant Project, shall assume ownership and operational responsibility for the Ballinger Lift Station and related meters and sewer mains from the City of Mountlake Terrace. If found necessary on the basis of the City's evaluation and at the City's discretion, these facilities shall then be upgraded to conform with City standards and needs, with capital cost participation by Mountlake Terrace and Ronald Sewer District based on capacity and with each of those Participants paying its share of the capital costs at the time of construction. operation and Maintenance costs will be allocated to each Participant annually on the basis of AADF. The City shall have the option of transferring the responsibility for the flows currently transported through the Ballinger Lift Station to the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle ("Metro") in the event that a sewage exchange for Metro Richmond Beach flows is implemented. In the event of such a flow transfer, and the construction of various facilities needed to implement the Metro transfer, the City, Mountlake Terrace, and Ronald Sewer District would retain the responsibility of all capital and Maintenance and Operation Costs, including possible demolition of the existing lift station, on --23® Packet Page 629 of 895 the basis of proportionate share of annual flow through the Metro transfer facilities. Under the Metro option the City would still retain the responsibilities related to the transport and treatment of the domestic sewage that currently flows through the Ballinger Lift Station, including, but not limited to, planning, preliminary and final engineering, metering, recording, accounting and reporting. The assumption by the City of the Ballinger Lift Station -- either through the City`s ownership and operation, or through transfer to Metro -- shall include a provision for honoring the existing agreement between Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood for emergency overflow to the west trunk sever with payment to the City via Mountlake Terrace by method that will protect the parties' purchased capacity at the Facilities. Also as part of this section, Mountlake Terrace shall have the right to close out its existing remaining debt service obligation to the City for existing facilities, because this remaining obligation is relatively small and has a very brief remaining period. The Parties to this Section 6.4 shall cooperate to the extent necessary to facilitate the sewage transfer between the City and Metro, recognizing that the construction of these facilities may include some temporary flow diversions, construction impacts, and other impacts which may not totally be anticipated at this time. It is recognized that the costs of the Ballinger Lift Station and the related facilities for implementing a Metro transfer are only participated in by the City, Mountlake Terrace, and Ronald Sewer District. - 24 - Packet Page 630 of 895 6. 5. Joint Use of Collection Systems Owned by One Party. It is recognized by the Parties that at present certain Parties discharge sewage into a collection and transmission system which is part of the Internal System of another Party. Furthermore, in the future one Party may wish to use parts of the Internal System of another Party as a practical means of transporting sewage. The joint use areas are shown on the Service Area maps in Exhibit F. The joint usage of such facilities shall be agreed to by both the discharging Party and the Party that owns these facilities. The discharging Party's voles of flow shall not be counted in the calculation of the facility owner's volume of Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage. 6. 6. Chargesand Procedures Related to Joint Sewerage Areas of OlyT2ic View Water and Sewer District and the City of Edmonds. The joint areas of these two Participants are shown in Exhibit F. The discharging Participant shall be responsible for all charges collected by the City for the transmission and treatment of the Domestic Sewage discharged into the joint facility, including all the costs contained in this Agreement , if applicable. The Participant owning the facility shall be reimbursed by the discharging Participant at the owning Participant's current rates for all costs related to the jointly used collection facility including Maintenance and Operation costs and General Facility Fees (also known as connection charges) related to this facility only. The discharging Participant shall be responsible for the billing of the discharging customer and for reimbursing the facility owner for its costs relating to the shared -25- Packet Page 631 of 895 facility. Sewer permits and inspections shall be provided by the discharger's Participant and such Participant shall provide the facility owner with a copy of the side sewer card and inspection report within 30 days after the final inspection. Should a jointly used Internal System require either capacity expansion or other capital improvements, the terms of funding such improvements shall be negotiated between the facility owner and the discharger's Participant. Section 7. Pa t for Maintenance, ration, and Overhead Costs for the Treatment of Domestic Sewage. 7. 1. Monthly Pa ts. Commencing as soon as practicably possible after the execution of this Agreement, the Participant shall make monthly payments to the City for the transportation and treatment of each Participant's Domestic Sewage. The monthly payments shall consist of one twelfth of the Participant's proportionate share of the Maintenance and Operation Costs and Overhead Costs adopted in the annual budget of the City for the Facilities. Each Participant's percentage share of the total annual Maintenance and Operation Costs and Overhead Costs shall be determined by dividing the AADF of the Participant for the calendar year preceding the budget year by the sum of the AADF of the Participants and the City for the calendar year preceding the budget year. If the total amount paid by the Participant during any calendar year is different from the amount due and oaring for the calendar year based on actual AADF and Maintenance and Operation Costs and Overhead Costs, a final adjusting bill or payment shall be made by the City by April 1 of the subsequent year with the adjustment mWem Packet Page 632 of 895 being paid or credited in 6 equal monthly installments. The estimated current monthly payments shall be computed on the basis of the following formula: Allocation = (Nast recent July --July flow %) X (Adopted O&M Budget)/12 Note. for the purposes of this Agreement the O & M Budget shall include the Overhead costs as well as direct costs. The City shall provide the Participants with a full accounting of all flows for each calendar year as well as a separate summia.xy of the actual Maintenance and Operation Costs incurred during the previous calendar year. The flows and costs will include both the Facilities and the Other Facilities, and shall be provided at the earliest time possible during the calendar year, and no later than March 1, barring unforeseen circumstances. Each Participant's monthly payments shall be due at the earliest date depending on the Participant's accounts payable cycle. In the event that the Participant's payment is received more than 45 days after receipt of City's bill, the City shall be entitled to a late payment surcharge equal to the interest which the payment would have earned for the period in excess of 45 days, based on an interest rate typically used for municipal investing purposes. 7. 2. Overhead Costs. In addition to the direct Maintenance and Operation costs described in Appendix B, each Participant will pay an Overhead Cost equal to 10 percent of the direct Maintenance and Operation Costs allocable to that Participant. The - 27 - Packet Page 633 of 895 percentage was computed by the "step --down" allocation method as applied to the City's general administrative, supervisory, and other indirect costs related to the operation and maintenance of the Facilities. The Overhead Cost percentage may be reviewed by the Oversight Committee at the request of any of the Participants within 3 years of the new plant start-up, estimated to be April of 1991. Any future review and change an the percentage shall utilize the "step down" method. 7. 3. Standby Maintenance Charge. Whenever a Participant discontinues the discharge of Domestic Sewage into the Facilities, or discharges less than 0.3 MGD of Domestic Sewage into the Facilities for a period of 30 days or more, the Participant shall pay to the City in lieu of the monthly charge described above (Section 7.1) until it regularly discharges more than 0.4 MGD, a standby maintenance charge, which shall be a monthly fee calculated by the City to provide for the Participant's proportionate share (as defined in Section 3.2) of the City's fixed (not related to amount of sewage) costs of operating and maintaining the Facilities in a condition of readiness to accept and treat Domestic Sewage at the full capacity of the Facilities. The Participant shall give the City written notice of its intention to discontinue the discharge of Dostic Sewage (or to reduce its regular discharge to less than 0.3 MGD) at least 2 months prior to such discontinuance, and shall give the City 2 months notice of its intention to commence discharging Domestic Sewage over 0.4 MGD into the Facilities. Overhead Costs shall be added to this charge. Packet Page 634 of 895 7. 4. Facilities Ca ital Improvements Find. The City shall establish a capital improvements fund to handle future capital improvements, Major replacements, or major repairs not included within the regular Maintenance and Operation Costs. The amount of the capital improvements fund shall be initially set at $100,000. Each Participant shall contribute to the fund in the same ratio as its original allocated capacity percentage as shown in Exhibit A. Disbursements from the fund shall be treated as having been made on a pro rata basis according to the same allocation as contributions to the fund. Initial assessments to the fund shall be made in equal annual installments over a period of five years. Subsequent assessments shall be structured so as to maintain as nearly as possible a $100,000 balance, and shall be phased on the same basis as the original assessments to the fund. Every five years the nominal amount of the fund (originally $100,000) shall be increased to reflect inflationary cost increases, using such commonly accepted indices as the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Index. The City shall maintain a separate accounting of the fund with any interest earning accruing and remaining in the fund. Disbursements from the fund in excess of $30,000 (as adjustable for inflationary cost increases as described above) shall be approved by the City Council, only after review and ccum-ent by the Oversight Committee. The existence of the Capital Improvements Fund and the fact that expenditures are made therefrom shall not be construed as limiting the ability of the City to make and allocate to the Participants needed expenditures on an emergency basis and under the terms of this --29- Packet Page 635 of 895 Agreement when the public safety, health and general welfare, legal and regulatory requirements or unforseen circumstances require expeditious action. Money in the Capital Improvements Fund shall be used only for future capital improvements, major repairs and major replacements to the Facilities, and shall not be pledged to or used for payment of any bonds, notes or obligations of the City or any of the other Participants. Expenditures from the Fund shall be considered a Maintenance and Operation Cost as defined in this Agreement and those expenditures shall be made as directed by the City. For purposes of cost allocation to Participants, however, these expenditures in the Maintenance and Operation Costs category will be allocated on the basis of Allocated Capacity of Domestic Sewage and not on the basis of annual flow. 7. 5. Participant's Rates and Sources of Payment. The Participant shall pay the charges described in Sections 7.1 through 7.3 out of the revenues of the Participant's Internal System. The Participant's payments to the City shall be part of the expenses of maintenance and operation of the Participant's Internal System, prior and superior to any charge or lien of any revenue bonds issued by the Participant that are payable from the revenues of its Internal System. The Participant shall establish rates and collect fees and charges for sewer service in amounts at least sufficient to pay for (a) the maintenance and operaton of the Participant's Internal System, including the Participant's payments to the City, and (b) the principal -- 30 - Packet Page 636 of 895 of and interest on any and all Participant revenue obligations that constitute a charge on the revenue of the Participant's Internal System. 7. 6. City Rates. The City skull establish rates and collect fees for sewer service in amounts at least sufficient to pay for (a) the maintenance and operation of the City's sewer system, including its share of the Facilities, and (b) the principal of and interest on any and all City revenue obligations that constitute a charge upon the revenues of the City's sewer system. 7. 7. Books and Accounts. The City shall keep full and complete books of accounts showing the Maintenance and Operation Costs incurred in connection with the Facilities and the other Facilities, and the portion thereof applicable to each of the Participants. The costs of keeping those books shall be considered to be a Maintenance and Operation Cost to the City. Audits of the books shall be performed every three years unless waived by the oversight Committee, and the cost shall be considered a direct cost of the Treatment Plant. More frequent audits, if requested by any Participant, shall be charged to the Participant(s) making the request. Section 8. Oversight Comnittee. 8.1. Establishment of oversight Committee. There is hereby established an Oversight Committee for the purpose of (a) advising the City concerning construction, operation, maintenance and expansion of the Facilities, (b) giving the Participants the opportunity to resolve any disagreements that may arise between or W 31 W Packet Page 637 of 895 among them with respect to the construction, operation, maintenance and expansion of the Facilities, (c) providing a mechanism for reviewing construction cost which raise the total Project Cost above $39.5 million, and (d) for the additional purposes described in this Agreement. The Oversight Committee shall consist of a designated representative (or designated alternate representative) of each Participant. Each Participant shall have one vote. 8.2. Oversight of Construction. Prior to and during construction of the Improvements, the City shall report to the Oversight Committee at least once each month concerning progress of the Project. Any increase in the Construction Cost above $39.5 million at the time of the awarding of the contract for construction of the Improvements, or at the time construction contract amendments are requested, shall be reviewed by the Participants in accordance with Section 3. 8.3. Oversight of Operations and Maintenance. After acceptance of the Improvements, the Oversight Committee shall meet at least quarterly, unless, by a vote of at least a majority of the votes held by the Participants, the Oversight Committee decides to meet less frequently. At each quarterly meeting of the Oversight Committee, the City shall report to the other Participants concerning the operation and maintenance of the Facilities as more particularly described in Exhibit B. On or before July 1 of each year, the City shall provide to the other participants a preliminary proposed budget for operation and -32_ Packet Page 638 of 895 maintenance of the Facilities during the following year, The City shall review and consider any reports and recommendations made by the oversight Committee on subjects and matters described in Exhibit B. Section 9. Replacement Standards; Insurance. 9. 1. Replac4etlent and Rehabilitation Standards. Replacement, reconstruction, rehabilitation, expansion or upgrading of the Facilities shall be in accordance with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. Additions, betterments and improvements to the Facilities of the City shall be installed and constructed in accordance with generally recognized engineering standards at least equal to the standards of the City and in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 9. 2. Insurance. The City shall purchase on behalf of all the Participants and maintain, through either companies or insurance pools, insurance sufficient to pay for all loss or damage to the Facilities resulting from their operation an a normal and prudent manner, including loss or damage caused by the operation of joint sewerage facilities which are not a direct part of the Treatment Plant. The Participant shall purchase and maintain, through either companies or insurance pools, insurance sufficient to pay for all loss or damage to the Facilities caused by the operation of its Internal System. In the alternative, the City or a Participant may set aside cash in a reserve fund in an amount sufficient to pay for such loss or damage, subject to review and recommendation by the Oversight Committee. - 33 - Packet Page 639 of 895 Section 10. Arbitration. In the event of a dispute between the City and a Participant concerning any matters arising under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless specifically excluded from arbitration, the dispute shall first be considered by the oversight Committee in a non -binding manner. If the dispute is not settled in the Oversight C-cmnittee, it shall be placed before an arbitrator approved by the disputing parties, and the decision of that arbitrator shall be final and binding on both parties. However, the parties by agreement may waive arbitration. The venue of the arbitration shall be the Seattle vicinity, unless the disputing parties agree otherwise. The arbitrator's fees and costs shall be shared equally by the Parties. Section 11. Successors and Assi_ nos. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon successors in interest and assigns of the Parties, and is not intended to confer rights or benefits upon any third party except as expressly stated herein. Performance of the obligations undertaken by either party may not be assigned without the prior written consent of the other, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Section 12. Amendment or Modification. No amendment or modification of this Agreement, including any addition or deletion thereto, shall be effective unless approved and executed by the Parties in the same form and manner as, and subject to the remaining provisions of, this Agreement. In the event the City contracts with any Participant in a manner that modifies the term of this Agreement, the _34- Packet Page 640 of 895 City and that Participant shall offer the other Participants the opportunity to incorporate the same terms in this Agreement or in additional contracts, assuming the modifications are applicable to the Participants. Section 13. Governing Laws. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Venue in connection with any legal proceeding affecting this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Snohc i.sh County. Section 14. Number and gender. Whenever applicable the use of the singular number shall include the plural, the use of the plural number shall include the singular and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. Section 15. Notice. All notices and payments relating to this Agreement shall be made at the following addresses, unless the other party is otherwise previously notified in writing: To the City: City of Edmonds 505 Bell Street Edmonds, Washington 98020 To the Participant: City of Mountlake Terrace 23200 58th Ave. West Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043-4697 Olympic View Water and Sewer District 23725 Edronds Way Edmonds, WA 98020-6097 Ronald Sewer District 17505 Linden Ave. N. P.O. Box 33490 Seattle, WA 98133 Packet Page 641 of 895 - 35 -- Section 16. Term. The term of this agreement shall be for 30 years from its effective date. At the end of this period the parties will negotiate in good faith towards the continuance of this Agreemnt with the understanding that the economic terms of continued participation will reflect the investment of the Participants in the Facilities and the remaining useful life and remaining capacity of the Facilities at that time. Section 17. Memorandum of understanding. This Agreement shall be construed and applied consistent with the Memorandum of Understanding, attached as Exhibit C, but in the event of conflict, this Agreement shall govern. This Agreement supersedes and replaces sewage service agreements between the City and Olympic View Water and Sewer District (dated October 9, 1967), and between the City and the City of Mountlake Terrace (dated October 5, 1971), and those agreements shall be of no further force and effect. EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE to be effective as of the date set forth above, or such later effective date as may be required under Chapter 39.34 RCW, if applicable. CITY OF MOUN TAKE TERRACE r Mayor CITY OF EDMONDS By �' or Packet Page 642 of 895 - 36 - vu.2146ME00 0 Attest: OLYMPIC VIEW WXrER AMID SEWER DISTRICT Board of Commissioners Attest: Approved as to Form: Attest: Approved as to Form: RONALD SEWER DISTRICT President, Board of Commissioners Attest: Approved as to Form: 37 - Va.2.146ME0041 Packet Page 643 of 895 Exhibit A Allocated Capacity and Proportionate Share Allocated Capacity Proportionate of Domestic Sewage* Percentage F,twnds** 4.609 MGD 50.787% Mountlake Terrace 2.103 MGD 23.174% Olympic View Water District 1.502 MGD 16.551% Ronald Sewer District 0.861 MGD 9.488% TOTAL: 9.075 100.000% ** Finds share includes separately contracted capacity for approximately 70 connections in the Town of Woodway, and separately contracted capacity for approximately 200 connections for Lynnwood. * Expressed in MGD's of AADF Packet Page 644 of 895 Exhibit B MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COSTS -DIRECT Direct costs include, but are not limited to: Labor, power, light, water, heat, phones, chemicals, equipment, tools, materials, supplies, insurance premiums, engineering services, attorney services, other contract services, rent, inspection, and taxes; The cost of rehabilitating, reconstructing or replacing equipmnt and portions of the Facilities as needed to continue substantially the same capacity and quality of service (Facilities Reserve and Replacement Fund., Section 7.4) or the debt service costs for obligations incurred for such replacement, rehabilitation or reconstruction (provided, that where the Participant provides a cash contribution for such replacement, rehabilitation or reconstruction, the City's debt service costs relating to the same replacement, rehabilitation or reconstruction shall not be included in Maintenance and Operation Costs for purposes of this Agreement), and Such financing and debt service costs for which the Parties may becore jointly liable. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COSTS -- OVERHEAD These are the costs which are initially set at 10% of the Direct O & M. costs. They were computed by the Step Down method, and are intended to recover general governmental costs related to the operation of the wastewater treatment plant and related facilities. These costs include but are not limited to: financial costs including budgeting, accounting, accounts payable; data processing; risk management; personnel administration including hiring, personnel management; buildings and grounds maintenance performed by the City; custodial work if needed; general legal costs; security; equipment rental (unless directly charged). M-10M Packet Page 645 of 895 Exhibit C Memorandum of understanding June 30, 1987 Rev. 7/15/87 Rev. 9/9/87 Rev. 9/22/87 flows only �a..:• • � it E • r �- i sr a Background The representatives of the jurisdictions named below and referred to as the Participants, have been meeting regularly since March, 1987, to draft the eleTrnmts of an Agreement for the provision of Secondary Sewerage Treatment Facilities (the Project) by the City of Edmonds for the Participants. This Memrandum incorporates most of the principles and concepts which the Legislative bodies have set in position papers exchanged earlier this year. Immediate execution of this Memorandum will enable all the Participants to commence financial participation in the project, and will be followed by the expedient preparation of a full legal Agreement. Principles 1. Each Participant is to fund its own share of plant design capacity, which for the purposes of cost allocation is defined as Annual Average Daily Flow (AADF), expressed in units of million gallons per day (MGD). 2. The following ultimate design capacities, expressed in Annual Average Daily Flows, will be made available to each participant: Edmonds Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water District Ronald Sewer District Woodway (46 4 BC€.T' s ) Lynnwood TOTAL: Capacity 4.498 2.082 1.487 0.852 0.107 0.049 Percentage 49.564% 22.938% 16.389% 9.383% 1.183% 0.543% 9.076 100.0000 Note: It is recognized that these percentages are subject to minor fluctuations for a brief interim period while some Participants are finalizing their precise flow figures. 3. The total project costs shall be allocated among the Participants according to the percentages of capacity as committed under item -- 40 - Packet Page 646 of 895 #2. Total project cost shall not exceed $45 million without .Participant approval. 4, Annual Operations and Maintenance costs, formalized in an annual budget, shall be allocated to the participants on the basis of yearly Annual Average Daily Flow percentages. Payments will be made on a monthly basis Allocation = (Last Year Flow %) x (Adopted Budget)/ 12 Note: An adjustment will be made at year's end to correct for actual expenditures and for actual flows. 5. All participants concur as to the formation of a formal Oversight Committee, advisory to the Edmonds City Council. The role of the Committee, to be provided for in detail in the final Agreement, shall include review and submittal of reconvendations on various operational and budgetary matters of a certain level of significance. Examples would include the establishment of a preliminary proposed annual budget by approximately the middle of the year; overhead costs levels; Reserve and Replacement Fund expenditures over $30,000; establishment and review of annual cost audits; long term capital plans; and influent quality standards" 6. An overhead cost equal to 1.0% of direct costs of 0 and M. shall be charged to all participants. The costs included in the direct and the overhead categories shall be detailed to the greatest extent possible in a technical appendix to the Agreement. The overhead factor can be reviewed by the Oversight C mmittee at the request of any of the Participants within 3 years of new plant start up. The Step -Down method shall be utilized for the purpose of computing and reviewing the overhead cost allocation. 7. Eligible costs shall include the costs of reasonable mitigation measures at the present Dayton Street site, designed with intent of minimizing and mitigating the impact of the plant on the immediate residential and commercial neighborhood. Costs shall include such elements as landscaping, buffering, limited structural concealment of the secondary clarifiers, a pleasant appearing street interface, and other necessary elements to achieve the objectives of reasonable mitigation. Also included will be the cost of the vacant parcel which was purchased by Edmonds in 1984 for the purposes of expansion to secondary treatment. 8. The final agreement shall contain provisions for the establishment of a reserve and replacement fund, to be shared in the same proportions as the capacity (item #2 above). The amount shall be established by the Oversight Committee, and all expenditures from the fund in excess of $30,000 shall be subject to its review. This will not be construed as limiting the ability of Edmonds to make and allocate to the Participants needed expenditures on an emergency basis when the public safety, health, and general ® 41 - Packet Page 647 of 895 welfare, regulatory mandates, or other unforeseen circumstances require expeditious action. 9. Any governmental grants to the project, whether made in a lump sum or through extended payments, shall be applied proportionately to the capacity shares paid by the Participants. 10. Upon execution of this Memorandum with the City of Edmonds, each signatory shall commence payment of outstanding and future invoices related to the planning, design, and construction of the project, at the percentage specified under item #2. Remittances are to be made to the City of Edmonds on a monthly basis. Documentation for billing shall be in the same manner as for grant reimbursements. 11. The final agreement shall include a provision for the transfer of capacity among willing Participants in this Memorandum and the subsequent Agreement, and shall include a method of determining appropriate cost of such transferred capacity. 12. Provisions shall be included for monitoring flows and land use permits, and for ensuring that allocated capacities are not exceeded by any participant. 13. The City of Edmonds, no later than January 1, 1992, shall assume ownership and operational responsibilities for the Ballinger Lift Station and related meters and sewer mains from the City of Mountlake Terrace. The facility shall be upgraded to conform with City of Edmonds standards and needs, with cost participation by Mountlake Terrace and Ronald Sewer District based on flows. Operations and Maintenance costs shall also be allocated on the basis on annual average daily flows. The City of Edmonds shall have the option of transferring operation of this lift station to Seattle Metro in the event that a sewage exchange for Richmond Beach flows is successfully implemented, and that such transfer of responsibilities is advantageous, to the same degree as without a flow exchange to Metro, to all parties. 14. Existing debt service obligations for the present system (an outstanding amount of approximately $25,000) shall be prepaid by the City of Mountlake Terrace at the time when the City of Edmonds assumes ownership and operational responsibility of the Ballinger Pump Station and related facilities. This would void existing capital obligations on the present treatment plant. 15. The City of Edmonds shall have a separate agreement with Ronald Sewer District for both sewage treatment and for the Ballinger lift station operation. The former agreement shall commence with the execution of this Memorandum, and the latter shall be implemented according to #13. 16. Ownership, operation, and maintenance of the treatment plant, and all attendant responsibilities, rest with Edmonds. -- 42 - Packet Page 648 of 895 17. The term of the agreement shall be for 30 years, with the Participants having a lifetime of plant interest by paying their share. 18. Capacity will be based on flow quantities only and not on sewage quality characteristics such as BOD and/or SS. Provisions will be made for the City of Edmonds to determine the acceptability, terms, and conditions for service to any customer within the service area who is found to have excessive BOD, excessive SS, or any other influent characteristics which may impact plant operations and costs. 19 Provision shall be made for honoring existing agreement between Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace for emergency overflow to west trunk sewer with payment to Edmonds via Mountlake Terrace by method that will protect the parties` purchased capacity. 20. Special provisions need to be made for cost allocation where the Participants serve customers in other Participant's jurisdictions, and where direct sewage metering is impractical. 21. Edmonds shall be responsible for the maintenance of accounting systems as required my accepted standards. 22. Provision shall be made for arbitration of disputes. 23. The concepts contained in this Memorandum, and in the subsequent full agreement, shall apply in predominantly the same manner to all parties sharing in the capacity of the plant. Some provisions may be necessary to address matters outside the Project of the Plant Operations, and which are of interest to some of the Participants only. Should the Participants not sign this memorandum simultaneously, any "latecomers" shall make payments to the other Participants (either directly or through Edmonds) for expenses already incurred. it is anticipated that Participants will be excluded from capacity participation in the treatment plant, other than as provided in existing contracts, unless the Memorandum is executed by September 20, 1987. 24. Edmonds and Olympic View Water and Sewer District agree to negotiate in good faith any and all operational service and administrative issues which are contained in existing agreements, or issues not contained in any agreements, and fall outside the funding of the Secondary Treatment Project and the operation of the Plant. 25. Section 23 notwithstanding, the City of Edmonds, at its own discretion, may assist the Town of Woodway in financing its share of the Project, on terms which are acceptable to both parties. This is in recognition of the unique obstacles which Woodway faces in financing its share of the project costs. Other Participant may offer the same kind of assistance to Woodway, subject to a review by the City of Edmonds. -43_ Packet Page 649 of 895 26. The execution of the N randum does not limit the right of all parties to negotiate the details of incorporating the principles of the Memorandum into the final Agreement. 44 - Packet Page 650 of 895 Y MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SIGNATURE PAGE City of Edmonds: S. WigZZn, mayor Date: Attest: ;-Si nature, Ti tl e City of Mountlake Terrace: r Date: Attest: Ronald Sewer District: l� Phi Montgome y Board of Co 1SSio er Date: (7 J 5J Attest: MEMOUND3/TXTSECON 4) gnature, r�—Pbtter re, ,, .4 e e ames Sinclair d Packet Page 651 of 895 Page 2 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Olympic View Water District: John M. Fischer Board of Commissioners SIGNATURE PAGE -- X 1z"� � Patricia L. Meeker ro Eyn Ej. NacKe Date: 'a Attest: Si nature, Title MEMOUND3/TXTSECON Packet Page 652 of 895 Exhibit D Equivalent Customer Calculation Parameters In areas of co -mingled and/or unmetered flows, direct measurement of one Participant's flows through the Internal System of another Participant may not be practical. In such a case the Parties would reach an agreement to determine alternative measures of sewage flows. The following uses shall be considered as having the listed Equivalent Customer Units: Single Family House -- 1 ECU, Non -Residential Dischargers (including all residential other than single family houses) -- 1 BCU per 750 cu. ft. per month of water usage. The 750 cu. ft. per month per ECU equivalence shall be subject to review by the oversight Committee when requested by any Participant. It is expected that Parties who use this Exhibit for computation of sewage flows will take into account factors which may cause the literal application of ECU methodology to either overestimate or underestimate the sewage flows. As an example, a school with extensive grounds would have very large seasonal fluctuations as to the actual sewage being discharged into an Internal System of a Participant, as well as in the consumption of water. The typical use of winter water consumption, which excludes lawn watering, would not be an accurate substitute because in the summer the school is vacant. Summer water consumption, however, is an inaccurate substitute as well because in includes irrigation water which is not discharged into sewerage systems. This example illustrates the problem, but in reality no school is in an area of co -mingled flows. In fact, almost all the uses in co -mingled flow areas are residential. - 45 - Packet Page 653 of 895 Exhibit E Methodology for Cost Computation Related to Capacity Transfer ® 46 -- Packet Page 654 of 895 EXHIBIT E TRANSFER OF CAPACITY COST CALCULATIONS METHODOLOGY PROJECT COSTS AND FINANCING PARAMETERS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL COST: $39,500,000 BOND INTEREST: 8.00% FUTURE VALUE 8.00% GRANT: 50.00% TERM: 20 INTEREST RATE: CAPACITY (MGD'S) 9.075 YEARLY PAYM'T: $22,166 (defined by capacity setter on the basis of a commonly used public 1988 NET COST OF 0.1 MGD (Approx. 430 homes): $217,631 finance index for municipal FUTURE VALUE OF 0.1 MGD IN YR. 20: $1,014,368 investments. it can be equal to Average daily flow from typical home, gal.: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 230 the bonding interest rate.) YEAR ACTUAL CUMULATIVE FUTURE YEAR FUTURE DEBT ----------------------------------------------------------------� SERVICE VALUE VALUE VALUE 1 $22,166 $22,166 $22,166 -------------------------------- 31 $2,365,140 2 $22,166 $44,332 $46,106 32 $2,554,351 3 $22,166 $66,499 $71,960 33 $2,758,700 4 $22,166 $88,665 $99,883 34 $2,979,395 5 $22,166 $110,831 $130,040 35 $3,217,747 6 $22,166 $132,997 $162,610 ( 36 $3,475,167 7 $22,166 $155,163 $197,784 E 37 $3,753,180 8 $22,166 $177,329 $235,773 ( 38 $4,053,435 9 $22,166 $199,496 $276,801 39 $4,377,709 10 $22,166 $221,662 $321,112 40 $4,727,926 11 $22,166 $243,828 $368,967 ( 41 $5,106,160 12 $22,166 $265994 $420,650 42 $5,514,653 13 $22,166 $288:160 $476,469 43 $5,955,825 14 $22,166 $310,327 $536,752 44 $6,432,291 15 $22,166 $332,493 $601,859 45 $6,946,875 16 $22,166 $354,659 $672,174 46 $7,502,625 17 $22,166 $376,825 $748,114 47 $8,102,835 18 $22,166 $398,991 $830,129 48 $8,751,061 19 $ZZ,166 $421,157 $918,705 49 $9,451,146 20 $22,166 $443,324 $1,014,368 50 $10,207,238 21 $1,095,518 51 $11,023,817 22 $1,183,159 52 $11,905,722 23 $1,277,812 53 $12,858,180 24 $1,380,037 54 $13,886,835 25 $1,490,440 55 $14,997,781 26 $1,609,675 56 $16,197,604 27 $1,738,449 57 $17,493,412 28 $1,877,525 58 $18,892,885 29 $2,027,726 ( 59 $20,404,316 30 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $2,189,945 60 $22,036,661 NOTE: FUTURE VALUE COLUMN IS THE AMOUNT WHICH A PARTICIPANT WOULD HAVE HAD IF INSTEAD OF BUYING 0.1 MGD, ITS FUNDS 1AD BEEN INVESTED AT THE FUTURE VALUE INTEREST RATE. TYPICAL HOME FLOWS ARE FOR EXAMPLE ONLY. FILE:FUTCOSTI 4/8/88 Packet Page 655 of 895 Exhibit E Description of Service Areas -- 1988 -- 47 - Packet Page 656 of 895 A SUITS£-T V [. B IJ n1n "AT to ni L f ; CD_ OUT FALL. 5ti ltZ UNIT t-LE UN17 VLA N � M m cn - Y - 00 o , E-4 • •., co 01 , 1 T fc EATMEN-T PLANT • + I 7 J1 11NtYS st,rzb .h � a w 5-Lc D.ND SZLD TRUNK Q UNIT 11 S r J`E-3 T n o - SNOHOMISH COUNTY ICING COLINT`C R O N A L D S E ,4 SL.J. D • f-' M 0 l s \�f, E-5 } `-'.-'�`�,- ''-�'-?'`'.�•'--'`'�' E- 4 M qlN �T r• Z O S r �� ST S L.S. L ' i LQ L.- 2 r 1 -5 1 i - 0-41 1:8-F t mot. �•. •� i, \ — � II 't� f METE R •L� 6 �� US ` TRUNK 0-4 � 0-3 s Ts�uuK 4 unssT so -Y -2 I� METER � � L •�i.t.:7n - sTa•o' I PUMP I ^ LAKE STATION1 (SNIT B 1tBAII»iNGGR \. � iO4GC Mf:11N T / u�lr9 i'` •; l Z0.4T�STS-ts. �• - LO,STy+ 9T, f STA•C" +� �'ETEit STA:'A" F� SYG^6" R-'L / o NOL`� ¢Oon UJ Q n- C. •t ETCILY 4 -3 1�• N G/ Q � � E R a t u DISTR�I -;T3Q ;y N ALLS L ASGF 1 7 7�1 'Ll-Tri -7-7 7-7 M-1 a AM 3 IuJ 11 1fn ... 7 7-r 7- r C E ' m A :�,,•.;• SNO!40MISH CouNTY 1C I l\1G C4U h1� Y L E G E N D ••• ....... PiLESENT Cti'Y t1Mli"S CJF .... �C�MONps It MOUNTf_AKc.TE.tZtZRc �(rr'`,--..�^ atLEAS r IZES�NTLV-SVL.sCRLa -TC -YM7= OC]MOND$ TTLI=ATMET-ST PlAtl ------- s>✓La�tz TrcuNtc. H Exhibit G Preliminary Project Cost Estimates CURRENT PROJECT COST ESTIMATF CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1990 Construction Costs Sales Tax Contingency - Est_ VE Savings Subtotal ALLIED COSTS Enginccring Predesign Design Construction Legal City Administration '1vlisc_ and Contingency Value Engineering Contingency Subtotal TOTAL $27,850,000 2,520,000 3.650.000 $34,020,000 - 79 000 $33,941,000 320,674 1,969,384 1,967,412 75,000 200,000 85,000 482,530 $5,000,000 $38,941,000 Potential Added Cast to Cover N. Clarifier CONSTRUCTION 400,000 ENGINEERING 29,300 TOTAL, INCL, OPTION 539,370,300 Packet Page 659 of 895 G.2 Agreement between City of Edmonds and Municipality of Seattle —July 20, 1988 Packet Page 660 of 895 N 0 V 2 9 1990 1;"'V(iNLi; iqi CITY OF EDMONDS F MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE AGREEMENT FOR RECIPROCAL SEWAGE TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the — day of �, 1988 between the City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as "Edmonds") and the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, a metropolitan municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as "Metro"); W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Edmonds and Metro own and operate separate facilities for sewage treatment and disposal in adjacent sewer service areas and have determined to upgrade those facilities to a higher degree of treatment to comply with the State and Federal Clean Water Acts; and WHEREAS, the City of Mountlake Terrace has been ordered by the State of Washington to make reliability improvements to the sewage pumping station that delivers its sewage to Edmonds' wastewater treatment facilities from the eastern portion of Edmonds sewer service area; and WHEREAS, Metro can deliver sewage from its Richmond Beach service area to Edmonds' sewage treatment plant and deliver sewage from the eastern portion of Edmonds' service area to its West Point sewage treatment plant at a cost generally compar- able with upgrading its Richmond Beach treatment plant and can, under such an arrangement, reduce the size of the Richmond Beach plant and convert it to a sewage pumping station; and WHEREAS, construction of conveyance facilities necessary to effect said delivery would result in abandonment, replacement and upgrading of the aforementioned Mountlake Terrace pumping -0 8� G'oRv� s-- a Fl Packet Page 661 of 845 - - ' I /' io' ,, -'- ., ' ' station and would also reduce the amount of sewage pumped by Edmonds from the eastern portion of Edmonds' service area; and WHEREAS, Metro and{Edmonds have determined that it is in the best public interest to enter into an agreement for the delivery by Metro of sewage that would otherwise be treated at its Richmond Beach plant to Edmonds and delivery of an equal quantity of Edmonds' sewage from the eastern portion of its service area to Metro as previously described; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and assurances described herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: SECTION 1. Sewage Treatment by Edmonds. Edmonds will accept, and be totally responsible for treatment and disposal of all sewage delivered to its treatment plant from Metro's Richmond Beach service area (hereinafter "Richmond Beach"), which is delineated on Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 2. Sewa e.Treatment by Metro. Metro will accept, and be totally responsible for treatment and disposal of sewage from the eastern portion of Edmonds' sewer service area (hereinafter "Edmonds East"), which is delineated on Exhibit B attached hereto, in an amount equal to the sewage delivered to Edmonds' treatment plant pursuant to Section 1. The term "equal" shall mean that the volume of sewage flow accepted by Metro pursuant to this Section 2 shall, in a calendar year (January 1 to December 31), be within five percent (5%) of the volume accepted by Edmonds pursuant to Section 1 hereof. Metro will, to the degree possible given technical limitations inherent in the design and operation of sewage pumping stations, cause the volume of sewage flow accepted by the parties from the respective service areas to be equal on a monthly and weekly basis. If, in any calendar year, the total volume of sewage flow generated in Edmonds East is less than the volume of sewage delivered to Edmonds pursuant to Section 1, thereby making impossible acceptance of an equal amount of sewage by Metro -2- Packet Page 662 of 895 as provided in this Section 2, Metro will pay Edmonds annually for treatment of the excess flows delivered to Edmonds by Metro, said payment to be a percentage of Edmonds operation, maintenance and capital costs determined in the same manner that monthly payments would be determined pursuant to Section 9. SECTION 3. Sewage Treatment Costs. Sewage treatment and disposal costs incurred by either party shall be paid by that party and, except as otherwise specifically provided in this agreement, no monetary payments shall be made by one party to the other for such purposes. SECTION 4. Construction and Operation of Conveyance Facilities. Except as provided in Section 5, Metro will be responsible for construction, ownership, operation and, maintenance of all facilities necessary to deliver Richmond Beach sewage to Edmonds and Edmonds East sewage to Metro as described in Sections 1 and 2, including all equipment, controls and mechanisms for monitoring the flows delivered to Edmonds and monitoring and regulating the flows accepted by Metro. Edmonds will cooperate in the procurement of permits and rights of way necessary to construct said facilities and will be identified as co -applicant in the application for said permits if so requested by Metro. Edmonds shall be provided with the opportunity to review plans for the sewage pumping station to be constructed as part of the facilities necessary to deliver Edmonds East sewage to Metro and may make recommendations regarding the design of said station including the controls and mechanisms for monitoring and regulating flows. It is anticipated that the facilities constructed by Metro pursuant to this Section 4 will intercept Edmonds East sewage at or near the site of the existing Edmonds -Mountlake Terrace make Ballinger Pumping Station. Metro will not, at any time, have any responsibility for operation, maintenance, repair or replacement of any sewage facilities upstream from said station and/or said point of interception. -3- Packet Page 663 of 895 SECTION 5. Pum2ing Station Cost Share. The sewage pumping station constructed by Metro as part of the conveyance facilities necessary to deliver sewage from Edmonds East to Metro treatment facilities will also be designed and constructed to pump that amount of sewage to Edmonds that exceeds the amount accepted by Metro pursuant to Section 2. Edmonds shall reimburse Metro annually for that portion of the total capital, operation and maintenance cost of the pumping station incurred to pump sewage to the Edmonds sewage treatment plant. From and after the date that Metro begins accepting sewage from Edmonds East pursuant to Section 2, the amount of Edmonds reimbursement will be determined and paid in the following manner. The annual capital cost payable by Edmonds to Metro will be determined by multiplying the annual debt service and any addi- tional ,annual capital costs for said pumping station by the percentage of the total sewage flow pumped by said station that exceeds the volume of sewage flow delivered to Edmonds by Metro pursuant to Section 1. The annual operation and maintenance cost payable by Edmonds to Metro shall be determined by multiplying the total annual operation and maintenance cost for the Pumping station by the percentage of total sewage flow pumped by said station that exceeds the volume of sewage flow delivered to Edmonds by Metro pursuant to Section 1. Debt service cost in this section shall mean the portion of Metro's total annual debt service cost represented by the total project cost of the pumping station minus any grants-in-aid applied to the pumping station project. The parties anticipate that the pumping station described in this section, along with the force main and gravity sewer necessary to connect said station to existing Metro facilities, will be constructed and placed in operation prior to the time that Metro accepts Edmonds East flows pursuant to Section 2 for the sole purpose of transporting Edmonds East flows to -4- Packet Page 664 of 895 Edmonds. From the time that the sewage pumping station described in this Section 5 is placed in operation and until such time that Metro accepts Edmonds'East sewage flows as described in Section 2, Edmonds shall reimburse Metro annually for the total annual operation, maintenance and debt service costs for said station. in this event, Edmonds shall also pay to Metro a portion of the cost of moving up from 1995 the date of construction of the force main and gravity sewer necessary to connect the pumping station to Metro's existing McAleer trunk. Edmonds' payment shall be determined in the following manner. The actual total project cost of said force main and gravity sewer minus any grants--in-aid shall be inflated at the,rate of six percent (6%) annually from the year of construction to the`year 1995 and then discounted back from 1995 to the year of construction at the rate of eight and one half percent (8.5%) annually. The difference between the figure so determined and the actual project cost shall constitute the cost of moving up the date of construction. Said cost shall then be divided into equal annual increments from the year of construction to 1995 and interest at the rate of 8.5% annually shall be added. Edmonds shall then pay to Metro annually a percentage of each annual increment and interest equal to the percentage of total pumping station sewage flow that exceeds the volume of sewage flow that is delivered by Metro pursuant to Section 1. Payment of the reimbursement amount shall be made to Metro within 60 days of receipt of a properly documented invoice. SECTION 6.- Emergency Overflows. Metro will accept Edmonds East sewage flows in excess of the limits described in Section 2 on an emergency basis subject to the capability of Metro conveyance facilities to accept such flows. The term "emergency" shall mean the temporary inability, due to breakage or malfunction, of Edmonds' sewage conveyance and/or treatment --5- Packet Page 665 of 895 N facilities to accept the sewage that would otherwise be pumped into Edmonds' facilities by the sewage pumping station described in Section 5. Acceptance of emergency flows will be subject to payment by Edmonds of the percentage of the total operation maintenance and capital costs of Metro conveyance and treatment facilities that the emergency overflow constitutes of the total sewage flow treated by Metro for each month that the emergency overflows are accepted. Metro shall have no responsibility for emergency overflows that exceed the capacity of Metro's McAleer Trunk sewer. Edmonds will accept the Edmonds East sewage flows described in Section 2 on an emergency basis subject to the capability of Edmonds conveyance and treatment facilities to accept such flows. The term "emergency" shall mean the temporary inability, due to breakage or malfunction, of Metro conveyance facilities to accept sewage that would otherwise be accepted into Metro facilities. Acceptance of emergency flows will be subject to payment by Metro of the percentage of the total operation, maintenance and capital cost of the Edmonds treatment plant that the emergency overflow constitutes of the total sewage flow treated by Edmonds for each month that the emergency overflows are delivered. Metro and Edmonds may temporarily divert sewage flows into each others' sewage conveyance facilities for other than emergency purposes and develop terms and conditions therefore when and if both parties mutually determine that it is in their best interests to do so. SECTION 7. Regulation of Discharges. Edmonds East sewage flows and their sources shall be subject to such reasonable rules and regulations as have been or may be adopted from time to time by the Metropolitan Council for purposes of regulating the nature and quality of wastes discharged into Metro sewage facilities. Edmonds shall assist and cooperate with Metro's _6_ Packet Page 666 of 895 efforts to regulate industrial discharges in Edmonds East and for such purposes will vest with Metro any authority that can legally be delegated and will consider for adoption any necessary revisions or additions to Edmonds rules and regulations governing sewage and industrial wastes. Edmonds further agrees to exercise appropriate authority to ensure that all industrial waste shall receive proper treatment before being discharged into any sewers that are tributary to Metro sewage facilities. For the purposes of this section, "proper treatment" means that such industrial wastes shall be treated in accordance with Metro Council Resolution Nos. 3374 and 4530, dealing with industrial wastes and waste discharge permits, together with any subsequent amendments thereto, or in accordance with such ordinances as Edmonds may adopt for purposes of ensuring pretreatment of industrial wastes. The term "industrial waste" shall have the meaning set forth in Metro Council Resolution No. 3374 and such ordinances as Edmonds may adopt for purposes of regulating discharges into public sewers. The ability of any source to discharge industrial waste into sewers that are tributary to Metro sewage facilities shall be expressly contingent upon Metro's issuance of a waste discharge permit to that source and payment of any permit fees that Metro may require. Metro reserves the right to refuse to accept any industrial waste from any source .that fails to secure a waste discharge permit or violates any terms or conditions of such a permit. Metro will cooperate with Edmonds in its efforts to regulate the nature and quality of wastes discharged from Richmond Beach to its treatment plant and for such purposes shall vest with Edmonds any authority that can legally be delegated and will consider for adoption any necessary revisions to Metro's rules and regulations governing sewage and industrial wastes. Discharges in the Richmond Beach service area shall continue to be subject to the same prohibitions, restrictions and pretreatment _7_ Packet Page 667 of 895 requirements as discharges into Metro sewage treatment facilities in addition to the requirements of such reasonable rules and regulations as may be applied by Edmonds throughout its sewer service area for such purposes. The parties intend, by this provision of the agreement, to insure compliance with local, state and federal laws applicable to the sewage flows being exchanged and cooperative enforcement of the parties respective industrial waste regulations. SECTION 8. Hi h Strength Wastes. Edmonds shall pay to Metro a surcharge for high strength discharges in Edmonds East equal to 50 percent of that amount that would be payable pursuant to Metro Council Resolution No. 2557 together with any subsequent amendments thereto, until January 1, 2010 and 60 percent thereafter; said percentage representing the estimated proportion of Edmonds East high strength wastes that will be treated by Metro pursuant to Section 2 based on current projections of sewage flows. The surcharge will be billed and collected by Edmonds in the same manner that the surcharge is billed and collected by Metro's component agencies. Direct measurement as required by Resolution No. 2557 will be undertaken by Metro. Edmonds and Metro may agree to adjust the foregoing percentages from time to time to reflect actual sewage flows. SECTION 9. Implementation Schedule. Edmonds will make every reasonable effort to complete construction of treatment facilities necessary to accept and provide legally prescribed levels of sewage treatment for Richmond Beach sewage flows by December 31, 1991 and Metro will make every reasonable effort to complete construction of treatment facilities necessary to accept and provide legally prescribed levels of sewage treatment for Edmonds East sewage flows by December 31, 1995; it being the intent of the parties that the respective sewage flows receive treatment in accordance with state and federal laws. Metro will also make every reasonable effort to complete the pumping station, force main and gravity sewer described ff:= Packet Page 668 of 895 in Section 5 by December 31, 1991. The parties acknowledge that completion of construction of one of the conveyance systems before the other and/or .requirements of regulatory agencies regarding level of treatment of flows in the respective service areas will likely result in simultaneous treatment by Edmonds of all flows from Richmond Beach and all flows from Edmonds East on an interim basis. If, for any reason, Metro delivers wastewater flows to Edmonds as described in Section 1 prior to the time it accepts wastewater flows from Edmonds as described in Section 2, Edmonds will accept said flows subject to monthly payment by Metro of the percentage of the total operation, maintenance and capital costs of the Edmonds wastewater treatment plant that the Metro delivered flow constitutes of the total sewage flow treated by Edmonds for each month that the Metro flows are delivered. SECTION 10. Grants. In the event that Metro receives any grants -in --aid for construction of any of the facilities described in Section 4 said grants, for purposes of this agreement, shall be applied proportionally to all facilities or facility elements described in Section 4. Any determinations of total capital costs for Edmonds wastewater treatment facilities that may be made for purposes of formulating charges to Metro pursuant to Sections 6 and 7 shall exclude grant funded capital costs. SECTION 11. Legal Relations. Any liability incurred by Metro as a result of construction and operation of the conveyance facilities described in Section 4 shall be the sole liability of Metro and any liability incurred by Edmonds as a result of construction and operation of sewage treatment .facilities in Edmonds shall be the sole liability of Edmonds. Edmonds will hold Metro harmless from any penalty imposed upon Edmonds by appropriate regulatory agencies for failure to provide prescribed levels of sewage treatment within legally prescribed deadlines. -g_ Packet Page 669 of 895 Metro will hold Edmonds harmless from any penalty imposed upon Metro by appropriate regulatory agencies for failure to i provide prescribed levels of sewage treatment within legally prescribed deadlines. ' SECTION 12. EIS Permits and. Public Information. Both Metro and Edmonds recognize that the planning and implementation of the new sewage conveyance facilities contemplated by this Agreement will require mutual cooperation and support. Edmonds hereby agrees to use its best efforts to assist Metro in the preparation and filing of applications for such permits and rights -of -way as may be requested by Edmonds and other jurisdictions in Snohomish County for the project facilities and to consider and act on any such applications to Edmonds as soon as practicable. If so requested by Metro, Edmonds shall be identified as a co -applicant for permits and approvals associated with the project, jointly issue environmental documents and attend and participate in such public hearings and public meetings in Snohomish County as Metro may deem appropriate. SECTION 13. Dispute Resolution. In the event disputes or claims arise over the interpretation, enforcement or effect of this Agreement, either party may refer the matter to a committee composed of Metro's Executive Director or his/her designee and its Director of Water Pollution Control and the Mayor of the City of Edmonds and its Community Services Director for resolution. The consideration of the dispute or claim by this committee, in an effort to reach a solution which reflects the best public interest, shall be a prerequisite to any legal action by either party. SECTION 14. Term_of Agreement. This agreement shall remain in full force and effect until July 1, 2036 and shall be binding on the successors and assigns of both parties. SECTION 15. Existing and Future Sewage Disposal Arrangements The parties acknowledge that Edmonds, by agreement with Ronald -10- Packet Page 670 of 895 Sewer District, currently provides sewage disposal service for an area inside Metro's boundaries and Metro currently provides i sewage disposal service in areas outside its boundaries in Snohomish County and that precedent therefore exists for sewage disposal arrangements that transcend the jurisdictional boundaries of each of the parties. The parties further acknowledge that there may be future extrajurisdictional arrangements for sewage disposal established by or affecting the parties and that this agreement may be amended during its term by mutual consent of the parties to facilitate or conform to such arrangements. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date written above. Attest: Attest: Clerk of the Council -11- City of Edmonds a or Municip ity of Metropolitan Exe utive Director Packet Page 671 of 895 G.3 Agreement between City of Edmonds and King County — October 6, 2000 Packet Page 672 of 895 CITY OF EDMONDS KING COUNTY AGREEMENT FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made as of the b� day of , , 2000 between the City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter "Edmonds") and King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington (hereinafter "the County"); WHEREAS, the parties have entered into an agreement for reciprocal sewage treatment dated July 20, 1988 and amended March 24, 1993 that provided for treatment of sewage from the County's Richmond Beach service area by Edmonds and treatment of sewage from the eastern portion of Edmonds service area by the County; and WHEREAS, said agreement also provided for simultaneous treatment of sewage from each of the two above mentioned service areas by Edmonds before implementing reciprocal sewage treatment as contemplated by that agreement; and WHEREAS; the parties now desire to more specifically determine the time period during which Edmonds will treat sewage from both service areas and modify the terms and conditions related to Edmonds treatment of sewage from both areas; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Earlier Agreement Superceded. The Agreement for Reciprocal Sewage Treatment entered into by the City of Edmonds and the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (predecessor to King County) July 20, 1988 and amended March 24, 1993 is hereby superceded by this agreement. Packet Page 673 of 895 SECTION 2. Sewage Treatment by Edmonds. From January 1, 2000 until July 1, 2036 Edmonds will accept and be totally responsible for treatment and disposal of all sewage delivered to its treatment plant from the County's Richmond Beach service area (hereinafter Richmond Beach) which is delineated on Exhibit A attached hereto and includes most of the Town of Woodway. From January 1, 2000 until January 1, 2012 Edmonds will also treat all sewage that is conveyed to the Edmonds treatment plant by the County's Lake Ballinger Pumping Station from the eastern portion of Edmonds' service area (hereinafter "Edmonds East"), which is delineated on Exhibit B attached hereto, SECTION 3. Payment Schedule. Except as provided in Section 11, payments from one party to the other that are required or provided for by this Agreement shall be made quarterly following submittal and receipt of appropriate invoices. SECTION 4. Payment to Edmonds. During the period of time that Edmonds treats sewage from both the Richmond Beach and Edmonds East service areas as described in Section 2, the County will pay Edmonds for treatment of the sewage delivered from Richmond Beach in the following manner: The County will pay Edmonds for the percentage of the total operation and maintenance cost of the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant that the Richmond Beach sewage flow constitutes of the total sewage flow treated by Edmonds at its plant. The County shall also pay to Edmonds $100,000 per year as a contribution to debt service and capital costs of the Edmonds treatment plant. For purposes of this agreement sewage flows from the Ballinger Commons Apartments shall be added to, and considered part of, the Richmond Beach sewage flows. SECTION 5. Reciprocal_ Sewage_ Treatment. From January 1, 2012 (or some other date as may be determined pursuant to Section 11) until July 1, 2036 the County will divert and 2 Packet Page 674 of 895 accept into the County's wastewater treatment system sewage flow from Edmonds East in an amount equal to the sewage flow delivered to the Edmonds treatment plant from Richmond Beach pursuant to Section 2. The term "equal" shall mean that the volume of sewage accepted into the county's system from Edmonds East shall, in a calendar year, be within 5% of the volume delivered to Edmonds from Richmond Beach. The County will, subject to operational limitations at its Richmond Beach and Lake Ballinger Pumping Stations, cause the sewage volumes accepted by the parties from the respective service areas to be equal on a weekly and monthly basis. Except as provided in Section 9, no payment shall be made to Edmonds for the treatment of Richmond Beach sewage during the time that Edmonds East sewage is diverted into the County's wastewater system as provided in Sections 5 and 6. SECTION 6. Reciprocal Sewage „Treatment Summer Option. The County may, at its sole option, divert Edmonds East wastewater into the County's system as described in Section 5 on a temporary basis in any year before 2012 for up to six summer months beginning no earlier than May I and ending no later than November 1. The County shall provide at least 30 days notice to Edmonds before diverting wastewater as described in this Section 6. SECTION 7. Tem ora Flow Diversions. During the time that Edmonds is treating flows from both service areas as provided in Section 2 the County will accept sewage flows from Edmonds East on a temporary basis if Edmonds is unable, due to malfunction or operating constraints in the Edmonds sewage conveyance system or treatment plant, to accept that sewage flow. In this event, Edmonds will pay the County $700 per million gallons of sewage flow accepted by the County. Said fee shall increase 2% every year after 2000. During the time that reciprocal sewage treatment is undertaken in accordance with 3 Packet Page 675 of 895 Section 5 the County will accept sewage flows on a temporary basis in excess of the volume that it accepts pursuant to that section for those same reasons identified immediately above. Following such a diversion, the County will make a reasonable effort to cause the total monthly sewage volume diverted into the County's wastewater treatment system to be equal (as defined in Section 5) to the volume delivered to Edmonds from Richmond Beach. If the County is unable to make said volume equal, Edmonds will pay the County a fee at the same rate described above. During the time that reciprocal sewage treatment is undertaken Edmonds will accept Edmonds East flows for which the County has treatment responsibility on a temporary basis if the County, due to malfunction or capacity constraints in its sewage conveyance and treatment system, is unable to accept that sewage flow. In that event, the County will pay Edmonds the same fee described above. The parties may also divert flows into each other's sewage conveyance facilities for reasons other than those described above under such terms and conditions they deem appropriate when they mutually determine that it is in their best interests to do so. The responsibility of either party to accept flows described in this section is subject to the physical capability of the respective sewage conveyance and treatment systems to accept those flows. SECTION 8. Regulation of Discharges. Edmonds East sewage flows and their sources shall be subject to the rules and regulations applicable to the treatment plant that treats those flows. When Edmonds east sewage is treated by the County, such sewage flows shall be subject the County's rules and regulations and Edmonds shall cooperate with the County's efforts to regulate industrial discharges in Edmonds East. When Edmonds East sewage is treated by Edmonds, such sewage flows shall be subject to the rules and regulations of Edmonds and/or the 11 Packet Page 676 of 895 Washington Department of Ecology. During periods of reciprocal sewage treatment King County and the Washington Department of Ecology shall cooperatively regulate industrial discharges in Edmonds East. The ability of any source to discharge industrial waste into Edmonds East sewers shall be expressly contingent upon issuance of a Waste Discharge Permit to that source by the County and/or the Washington Department of Ecology. Richmond Beach sewage flows and their sources shall be subject to such rules and regulations as may be adopted by Edmonds and/or Ecology for the purpose of regulating the nature and quality of wastes into Edmonds' treatment plant. King County shall cooperate with Edmonds' and/or Ecology's efforts to regulate industrial discharges in Richmond Beach. The parties intend, by this Section 8, to ensure compliance with local, state and U.S. laws applicable to the sewage flows being exchanged and cooperative enforcement of the parties' respective industrial waste regulations. SECTION 9. High Strength Waste. During any period of time that Edmonds East sewage is treated by the County, Edmonds shall pay to the County a surcharge for high strength discharges in Edmonds East. Said payment shall be equal to 55% of the amount that would be payable under King County Ordinance 11034 and any subsequent amendments. Direct measurement as required by King County Ordinance 11034 will be undertaken by the County. The County shall pay to Edmonds a surcharge for high strength discharges in Richmond Beach in accordance with such ordinances as may be adopted by the Edmonds City Council for the purpose of establishing high strength waste surcharges in the Edmonds sewage treatment service area. SECTION 10. Pum �ping Station Cost Share. During the time that Edmonds treats sewage flows from both Edmonds East and Richmond Beach, Edmonds shall reimburse the County for 5 Packet Page 677 of 895 the total operation and maintenance cost of the County's Lake Ballinger Pumping Station incurred to pump sewage to the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant. Said reimbursement shall be reduced, however, by the percentage of said cost that reflect the percentage of total flows pumped by said station from Ballinger Commons Apartments. During periods of reciprocal sewage treatment Edmonds shall reimburse the County for the portion of the operation and maintenance cost of said pumping station that reflects the percentage of total sewage flow pumped to Edmonds that exceeds the volume delivered to Edmonds by the County from Richmond Beach. The specific formula follows: Volume pumped via Ballinger to Edmonds (A) minus volume delivered to Edmonds from Richmond Beach (B) equals C. C divided by A equals X. Operation and maintenance cost multiplied by X equals Edmonds payment for operation and maintenance. During both of the sewage treatment arrangements described in this section, Edmonds shall pay the portion of the Coimty's annual debt service costs on said pumping station that reflects the percentage of total flow pumped to Edmonds that exceeds the volume delivered to Edmonds by the County from Richmond Beach. The same specific formula described in the immediately preceding paragraph shall be used to determine the amount to be paid to the County. "Annual debt service costs" as used in this section shall not include any additional percentage of those costs for debt service coverage requirements applicable to the County's bonded debt. SECTION 11. Review of Terms and Conditions in Sections 2 and 3. Any time after January 1, 2006 either party may request a review of the terms and conditions in Sections 2 or 3. Any changes in those terms and conditions shall be by amendment to this agreement except for extension of the time frame described in Section 2 which may be extended beyond January 1, I Packet Page 678 of 895 2012 by simple written concurrence of the parties. Said extension by simple written concurrence shall not however, extend beyond July 1, 2036. Section 12. Reimbursement for Capital Costs at Edmonds Treatment PIant. The County acknowledges its obligation to reimburse Edmonds for a share of certain capital costs incurred by Edmonds at its treatment plant during the effective period of the prior agreement between the parties for reciprocal sewage treatment. The parties have determined said amount to be $250,000 which shall be paid by the County to Edmonds in two annual installments of $125,000 each. The county shall make the first payment to Edmonds within 45 days of execution of this agreement. SECTION 13. Legal Relations. Any liability incurred by the County resulting from operation of its wastewater conveyance and treatment facilities shall be the sole responsibility of the County. Any liability incurred by Edmonds resulting from operation of its wastewater conveyance and treatment facilities shall be the sole responsibility of Edmonds. The parties acknowledge their obligation to comply with lawful orders with the state or federal agencies with jurisdictions or a court of competent jurisdiction. The obligations and rights established by this agreement shall be interpreted accordingly to assure compliance with the terms with such an order. SECTION 14. Dispute Resolution. In the event disputes or claims arise over the interpretation, enforcement or effect of this agreement, either parry may refer this matter to a committee composed of the Director of King County's Department of Natural Resources or his/her designee and its Manager of Wastewater Treatment and the Mayor of the City of Edmonds or his/her designee and its Public Works Director for resolution. The consideration of the dispute or claim by this committee, in an effort to reach a solution which reflects the best public interest, shall be a prerequisite to any legal action by either party. SECTION 15. Term of Agreement. This agreement shall take effect April 1, 2000 and 7 Packet Page 679 of 895 remain in full force and effect until Julyt, 2036. This agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date first written above. City of Edmonds May or Attest: King County Director, Department of Natural Resources Attest: Packet Page 680 of 895 ervice Area Map produced by GIS stag, Wastewater Treatment Division (WM), King Counly DepomnentofNaaal Rnsoa . WCDdisclsi=mywmtiaatyfaruaeofdisdigixd ® KING COUNTY H was product beyond that for whicb it design od. Weithea this digiW pmduct, nor my portion Ihcreof may be reproduced in my form or by my meats without w e the expressed written mthmuation of WrD. This document includes data wpyrighted by&a KmH Map Company and is being vsW with 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Feel s thcbpermission, UK is restricted. January 11. 2001 Legend Richmond Beach Service Boundary Streets County Line Freeways Water Features Packet Page 681 of 895 c;str n.r ca s E=DMo, f 51NROJ�cr51 ;iris ;x. �Ph Edmonds East Service Area Exhibit B h4tp pm,hicrvi hyalS stvii; l5'a�avmcr'in:uaa;n� Uivicicn 115'31]), Kic4g C'onnry I]epyat�m oihtaaai {;,satrrcxs 551Y1 riLcclsirrxr ung nm�rurn lrruu il'dris dislul l�tudutt SuynnA �hw for rvhizl: 1.w oy d yiy,ttrd. "!raiser saris il},itai k mJEoi;. n�ranp pnnian iktcrn>3 nay iw rtprt h-•+l intvty by r}axua-ral�ouo :F�e c�prc.�sed ++riuc� aan6rsrizrckret ui SVii�, 'S7rix duewrr�m includes dzvU crgryriphted Ly tirc 3;[rr41 Map Cnixy'rmrg end Is hl in, --I with 4001Y ilre r pianLSinn. Uic is testricrnd. � KQNG COUNTY s InaQ oan 3060 Fes! 6A y !0, 26QQ Streets 'County Line Freeways Water Features Edmonds East Basin Packet Page 682 of 895 G.4 Agreement between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood — October 26, 1982 Packet Page 683 of 895 AGREEMENT FOR JOINT USE OF SANITARY SEWERAGE FACILITIES BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS & CITY OF LYNNWOOD TRUNKS -- TREATMENT - DISPOSAL THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed this 26th day of October , 1982, by and between the CITIES OF LYNNWOOD and EDMONDS, hereinafter referred to as "Lynnwood" and "Edmonds", both being municipal corporations of the State of Washington and Located in Snohomish County, Washington. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on August 5, 1965, Lynnwood and Edmonds did enter into an agreement for the joint use of certain sanitary sewage disposal facilities, including a system of trunk sewers, a sewage treatment plant and a deep water outfall sewer line, presently owned and operated by Lynnwood; and WHEREAS, on November 20, 1972, said agreement was modified under Amendment No. 1, by mutual agreement between Lynnwood and Edmonds to provide for additional capacity in, and use by, Edmonds of certain trunk sewers presently owned and operated by Lynnwood; and i WHEREAS, the said agreements established, among other things, the apportionment of capital costs of those certain sanitary 1 sewage disposal facilities for which each party would be f responsible, and the capacity of such facilities that would be reserved to each party; and WHEREAS, undet the said agreements Edmonds advanced the amount of approximately $128 , 095 .40 as Edmonds' fair share of the Page 1 i Packet Page 684 of 895 capital costs of the said facilities, and certain capacities of such facilities were so reserved for the use of Edmonds as described hereinafter and as indicated on Exhibits A, C, and D attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the Cities of Edmonds and Lynnwood have a Mutual need of, and have requested from .each other, sanitary sewerage service for the areas designated as: AREA El -- City of Edmonds area served by City of Lynnwood treatment facility and trunkage system. AREA L2-- City of Lynnwood area served by City of Lynnwood treatment facility, and trunkage systems owned by City of Lynnwood and City of Edmonds. AREA L3 — City of Lynnwood area served by City of Edmonds treatment facility and trunkage system. All as described hereinafter and as indicated on Exhibits A and R, attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, service to these areas may be conveniently provided by gravity flow, or by pumping can be economically made to flow into the other respective City's existing sewer system; and WHEREAS, the Agreement of August 5, 1965 and the Amendment No. 1 of November 20, 1972 did not provide for capacity in and use of the sewer trunks to all of these areas; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that these areas are within the drainage basins to the respective treatment facilities, and logical extensions of existing joint sewer trunk systems thereto; and WHEREAS, under conditions actually experienced subsequent to Page 2 Packet Page 685 of 895 the entering into of said agreements, it is now found necessary to more clearly define the limits of said drainage basins and to more clearly describe the respective cities' joint sanitary sewage disposal facilities; and WHEREAS, under the said agreements, it has been determined that Edmonds now has sufficient capacity reserved in Lynnwood's sewage treatment plant and outfall sewer line to serve AREA El, but that by reason of an ambiguity in the previous trunk sewer description, Edmonds has insufficient capacity in Lynnwood's system of trunk sewers to serve that portion of AREA El herein- after designated as AREA EIB7 and WHEREAS, LYNNWOOD's need of sanitary sewerage service to AREA L2, and EDMON DS' need of sanitary sewerage service to AREA E1B, may be conveniently provided by a mutually beneficial and equitable exchange of capacity in and joint use of certain existing systems of trunk sewers presently owned, operated and maintained by the other respective City; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 1971, Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace did enter into an agreement for the joint use of certain sanitary sewage disposal facilities, including a system of trunk sewers, a sewage lift station, a force main, five sewage metering stations, a sewage treatment plant, and a sewer outfall, all presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace as established by said agreement and as described hereinafter and as indicated on Exhibit A and Exhibit C, Fart 3, attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, under said agreement on October 5, 1971, Mountlake Terrace did recognize Edmonds' right to provide, through the Page 3 Packet Page 686 of 895 joint sewerage system, sanitary sewer service to certain areas including any other areas or agencies which had been theretofore or may be thereafter mutually agreed upon; and both parties agreed that all such areas shall be considered a part of Edmonds for purposes of that contract; and WHEREAS, on May 12, 1982, Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace did mutually agree to Edmonds providing of such sanitary sewer service to Lynnwood's AREA L3 as hereinbef_ore designated; and WHEREAS, the best interests of the residents of Edmonds and Lynnwood require that those certain trunk sewers, treatment facilities and outfall sewer lines be operated and maintained for their -mutual benefit as provided herein; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of both cities to simplify the determination of Maintenance and Operation charges to the respective cities for the joint use of said sanitary sewage facilities; and WHEREAS, to accomplish the joint treatment and disposal of the sanitary sewage collected by the two parties, it is necessary that a contract be now entered into providing for the operation, maintenance, joint use and the payment therefore, of those certain sewerage works facilities to be so jointly used, and defining the rights, duties and obligations of the parties therein; and WHEREAS, by reason of these and of other unforeseen circumstances and events, the said agreements of August 5, 1965 and the Amendment No. 1 of November 20, 1972, no longer are deemed -suitable nor adequate to fulfill either the original intent or the present and future needs of the parties thereto; Rage 4 Packet Page 687 of 895 NOIN THEREFORE, and in consideration of Ehe promises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the said parties HEREBY ENTER IIJTO A NEW AGREEMENT AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS. The following words and phases as used in this contract shall have the meanings herein- after set forth in this section: (a) The terms "Joint Sewerage Facilities" or "Joint Sewerage System" shall mean all of the facilities heretofore constructed or to be constructed and used jointly by Edmonds and Lynnwood for transporting, treatment and/or disposal of sanitary sewage, wastes, all as more particularly described hereinafter and as indicated on Exhibits A and C, attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein. (b-1) The terms "Joint Sewerage Service Area" or "Joint Service Area" shall mean the area ultimately contemplated to be nerved through the joint sewerage facilities, as described hereinafter and as indicated on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein. (b-2) The terms "Edmonds service area" and "Lynnwood service area" shall mean those certain areas lying within the respective corporate limits of each City which will contribute sanitary sewage to the "joint sewerage system" as hereinbefore described. (See also Section 7.) (c) The term "construction cost" or "capital cost" shall mean all costs of actual construction including the cost of acquistion of real property and/or rights -of -way, engineering design and inspection fees, legal costs, preparation of construction contract documents, disposition of claims incident Page 5 Packet Page 688 of 895 to construction, financing costs, including discounts, and other miscellaneous expenses directly attributable to the cost of acquiring and constructing the facilities hereinbefore described and included in the "joint sewerage syste m", less applicable state and federal grant monies. (d) The term "operation and maintenance expense" shall mean all expenses for labor, power, light, water, heat., chemicals, materials, supplies, insurance premiums, contract services, tools, equipment, and other miscellaneous expenses directly and properly chargeable to the operation and maintenance of the "joint sewerage system" facilities. (e) The term "sanitary sewage" or "sewage" shall mean all water -carried wastes that occur as a result of human occupancy or occupation and is normally required to be given special treatment and disposal by the State Regulatory Agencies before being discharged to public waters, and shall not include such wastes as may require other than normal transmission and treatment as is now provided by the "joint sewerage system" facilities. -(See also Section 6). (f) The term "Treatment plant" or "Sewage Treatment Plant" shall mean the existing sewage treatment plant of the City of Edmonds, or of the City of Lynnwood, as applicable, together with any additions thereto and improvements thereof which may he hereafter constructed or installed. (g) The term "Outfall Sewer" shall mean the existing sewer and submarine pipeline transporting liquid effluent from Edmonds or Lynnwood sewage treatment plant, as applicable, to point of discharge into deep water in Puget Sound, and any additions Page 6 Packet Page 689 of 895 thereto and improvements thereof which hereafter may be constructed or installed. (h) The abbreviation "MG" shall mean million gallons of sewage or water quantity. (i) The abbreviation "MGD" shall mean a rate of flow which would result in one million gallons per day of sewage or water quantity. (j) The term "annual average daily flow" shall mean the total flow of sewage in millions of gallons during a full calendar year in which the joint sewer facilities shall have been used, divided by the number of days in such year, and shall be expressed in MGD. (k) The term "maximum daily flow" shall mean the total flow of sewage in millions of gallons during that day in each calendar year in which the greater volume of flow in one day occurs, and shall be expressed in MGD; provided, that should an abnormal flow occur on any one day due to temporary conditions which are subsequently corrected, then such abnormal flow shall not be considered. (1) The "total annual sewage flow" shall mean the total flow of sewage in millions of gallons during a full calendar year in which the joint sewerage facilities shall have been used; and shall be expressed in MG. (m) The term "total annual waiver consumption" shall mean the total cubic feet of water billed to a City's users of the joint sewer facilities during a one-year billing cycle, multiplied by 7.48 gallons per cubic foot and divided by one million; and shall be expressed in MG. Page 7 Packet Page 690 of 895 (n) The tern "sewage flow ratio" or "SFR" shall mean the total annual sewage flow divided by the sum of the total annual water consumptions of the entities using the joint sewer facilities. In ARF,A L3, the SFR derived for the Lynnwood treatment plant shall be multiplied by the total annual water consumption of the Lynnwood users in AREA L3 to obtain a total annual sewage flow into the Edmonds treatment plant for the purpose of apportioning maintenance and operating expense for such a year. (o) The term "originating party" shall mean the City in which sewage flow commences, or is produced. (p) The tern "serving city" shall mean that City which provides joint sewerage system service to the other City. SECTION 2. DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE OF SEWAGE. Each party hereto agrees to deliver to the joint sewerage system facilities of the other such sanitary sewage that the originating party deems most economically feasible for the maximum benefits of the customers in its service area, and the other agrees to accept such sewage for transmission, treatment and disposal through the joint sewerage system facilities. Any additional facilities as may be needed to collect and, transmit the sewage .from the point or points where it is produced to the point of connection to the joint sewerage system facilities shall be constructed, maintained and operated at the sole expense of the originating party. All facilities so constructed by such originating party as well as any additions, extedsions, and betterments constructed by and for the other in its service area shall be not less than equal to the Page 8 Packet Page 691 of 895 minimum standards as are required by the other. SECTION 3, PAYMENT FOR USE OF .JOINT SEWERAGE SYSTEM FACILITIES. The payment by each party hereto to the other for its use of the joint sewerage system facilities now owned and operated by the other, shall be computed on a fair and reasonable basis as is herein provided for through this contract and which will result in each party bearing its pro rata share of the total costs attributable to the construction, acquisition and operation of the joint sewerage system facilities• Such payments shall be divided into two parts: (a) Operation and Maintenance charge, and (b3 Capital Reimbursement charge. In any and all billings for these charges, they shall be separately stated. Each party will bill the other monthly for the Operation and Maintenance charge and each will remit within thirty (30) days after submittal of the 'bill. Year-end billing for operation and maintenance expense adjustments, as hereinafter provided, shall be made in April of the following year. Payment by Edmonds to Lynnwood, or by Lynnwood to Edmonds, for Capital Reimbursement charges may be made in a lump sum, sixty (60) days after the signing of this contract by both parties or on either an annual or monthly basis, all as hereinafter provided in Exhibit "E", attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein. Total payments for these charges shall include accrued interest at the rate of 8.00% per annum beginning with the date of signature of this agreement by both parties. There shall be no interest on the Operation and Maintenance charge. (a) Operation and Maintenance Char e: Wage 9 Packet Page 692 of 895 For the balance of the calendar year of 1982 and through the April 1, 1983 billing, each party will pay the other an Operation and Maintenance charge as hereinafter provided in Exhibit "F", attached hereto, and by this reference incorporated herein• By DFarch 15, commencing with the year 1983, each party will tabulate the actual operating and maintenance expenses of their own joint sewerage system facilities for the preceeding calendar year_ These costs will establish the basis for charges for the current year, which charges shall be changed each year as of April 1. Each party will furnish the other with an itemized listing of all costs along with a tally of the total annual water consumption of all customers being served by such party through the joint sewerage system facilities, and these shall be tabulated on a revised Exhibit "F". The total annual costs as so determined shall be used as the basis of charge for the current year as of April 1, and this figure divided by 12 shall be the rate per month charged by the respective cities. In April of each year, each City shall bill or credit the other for any differences between total actual billings for preceeding calendar year and billings based on actual cost incurred. (b) Capital Reimbursement Charges: In order to reimburse the serving City for a share of the construction cost of the joint sewerage system facilities, the other City shall pay to the serving City a sun which represents a prorata portion of the joint sewerage system unit facility capacity based upon present or future sewage flows, as may be applicable. Page 10 Packet Page 693 of 895 The sum to he paid to the serving City by the other City shall be based upon a reimbursement percentage to be computed in the following manner: Other City Flow = Reimbursement Other Serving Percentage City Flow + City Flow The sewage flows used in the computation shall be in units of M.G.D. from measurements or derived from present or projected water consumption as hereinbefore described. The reimbursement percentage shall be calculated For each of the separate facilities of the joint sewerage system and when multiplied times the cost of such separate facilities will determine the other City's fair share of the serving City's capital costs expended in constructing such facilities, all as shown on Exhibits "D" and "E", attached hereto. The reimbursement percentage figure when computed based upon either present or estimated future flows shall be used in determining that portion of the design capacity measured in MDG of each of the separate facilities that, with payment of the capital cost, will be reserved to the other City. In order to amortize a City's share of the capital cost over the remaining specified life of joint sewerage system facilities, said City may elect, as an alternate, to pay the total amount shown on Exhibit. "E", in one lump sum payment sixty (60) days after the acceptance and signing of this contract by both parties hereto. In the event this alternate is so selected and declared in writing prior to the 60-day termination date, there shall be added to the Jump sum due interest computed at the rate of 8.00% per annum from date of contract signing by both parties to the .'age 11 Packet Page 694 of 895 payment date. At such time in the future as it may become necessary for a serving City to provide additional sewerage facilities to increase the capacities of the joint sewerage system, a review of the reserve capacities purchased by the other shall be made with respect to the share of total design capacities of each unit then being used. If, at that time, the other City is using more than its reserve capacity, it shall either purchase additional capacity in the new facilities to be constructed, or in some manner reduce its contributing flows to the level of the reserve capacities purchased under this contract. In the event that the other City is found to be using less than the reserve capacities purchased hereunder, then it may elect to maintain its position and not be required to purchase additional capacities in the new facilities planned, or it may elect to purchase additional capacity as added future reserve, or may elect to sell its excess reserve capacity purchased hereunder and the serving City agrees to purchase same at the original cost to the other. No interest will he included in this buy-back agreement so as to compensate for the depreciation that will have accrued during the other City's holding period. In the event the serving City is required to replace, improve or upgrade any of the joint sewerage system facilities as required to meet State or Federal regulations, then both parties agree to share in such costs in the manner provided for sharing capital costs on the now existing joint sewerage system facilities. In the event the serving City is required to replace any joint sewerage system facilities as a result of a loss in excess of the coverage required in Section 9, then both Page 12 Packet Page 695 of 895 parties agree to share in the replacement costs in the manner provided for sharing capital costs on the now existing joint sewerage system facilities. SECTION 4. RECIPROCAL SERVICE AGREEMENT. In the event any area, presently or in the future, lying within the City limits of either City is most advantageously served through sewerage facilities owned and operated by the other that discharges sewage into the joint sewerage system, the City requesting service is hereby granted the right to use such facilities for the transmission of its sewage. The costa due the serving City from the other for such service and the use of such facilities shall be calculated and regulated in the same manner and style as herein provided for Edmonds' use of Lynnwood's facilities, or Lynnwood's use of Edmonds' facilities. Lynnwood sewage flows through Ballinger Pump Station No. 8 shall be subject to approval by Mountlake Terrace. (See also Section 7.) SECTION 5. MEASUREMENT OF SEWAGE FLOWS. For the purpose of determining the MGD flow of each City as is being discharged through the joint facilities, the total annual water consumption in MG, of all customers as determined by the use of the most recent amendment to Exhibit "F" as hereinbefore provided, shall be divided into the total flows measured at the treatement plant, a part of the joint sewerage system facilities, and multiplied by each City's average annual water consumption expressed in MGD. Additional metering throughout the joint sewerage system facilities may be performed at the request of either party hereto Page 13 Packet Page 696 of 895 and the results of such added metering shall .be accepted by both parties. The costs of performing such additional metering shall be borne by the City requesting same. SECTION 6. CONTROL, OF SEWAGE QUALITY. Each of the parties hereto shall be responsible .for control of the quality and character of sewage delivered into the joint sewerage system, and to this end shall adopt and enforce suitable rules and regulations to prevent entry into the joint sewerage system of septic sewage, petroleum waste, tar, creosote, naptha, or -other chemicals and/or waste detrimental to the proper functioning of the sewage treatment plant and/or elements of the joint sewerage system. Both parties will take whatever means necessary to exclude storm water, roof and surface drainage connections to the sanitary sewers which drain into the joint sewerage system and will not permit entry of sewage waste which had a B.O.D. concentration in excess of that normally found in domestic sewage. SECTION 7. NONRESIDENT CONNECTIONS. No person or organization shall be permitted to connect to or otherwise make direct use of the joint sewerage system, if said person or organization is not located within the boundaries of one of the parties to this agreei;tent, without the written consent of the parties to this agreement, provided that municipal corporations may so connect with the permission of the City to which facilities it directly connects. For the purpose of allocating operation costs and .future expansion of the joint sewerage syste€n facilities as provided hereinbefore, any connection made under Page 14 Packet Page 697 of 895 this Section shall become a part of the service area of the City to which it directly connects. Lynnwood sewage flows through Ballinger Pump Station No. 8 shall be subject to approval by Mountlake Terrace. (See also Section 4.) SECTION 8. AUDIT. Either party to this agreement shall have the right to audit the financial records of the other relevant to this agreement by making written notice at least 30 days prior to said audit. The cost of any such audit shall be at the expense of the party making the request. SECTION 9. INSURANCE AND LIABILITY DAMAGES. Each City shall maintain insurance on their treatment plants and sewage lift stations in an amount sufficient to enable replacement or restoration of any such facilities damaged or destroyed as a result of casualty or loss• normally insured against by sewer utilities operated in a reasonable and prudent manner. The proportionate share of the cost of said insurance applicable to the joint sewerage system shall be included as a part of the operation and maintenance expense and charged to the other. Each of the parties hereto shall also maintain public liability insurance with bodily injury limitations of not less .than $500,000 per occurrence and $500,000 aggregate, and property damage limitations of not less than $250,000 per occurrence and $250,000 aggregate. SECTION 10. ASSIGNMENT. Neither of the parties hereto shall have the right to assign this agreement or any of its rights and Page 15 Packet Page 698 of 895 obligations hereunder, nor to terminate its obligations hereunder by dissolution or otherwise, without first securing the written consent of the other party, and this agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. SECTION 11. NOTICE. Whenever in this agreement notice is required to be given, the same shall be given by registered mail addressed to the party at the following addresses: C i ty of Edmonds Civic Center Edmonds, Washington 98020 City of Lynnwood City Hall Lynnwood, Washington 98036 unless a different address shall be hereafter designated in writing by either of such parties. The date of giving such notice shall be deemed to be the date of mailing thereof. Billings for and payments of operation and maintenance costs may be made by regular mail. SECTION 12. EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES. Each party agrees that it will execute any and all instruments, documents and resolutions or ordinances necessary to rive effect to the terms of this contract. SECTION 13. EFFECTIVE DATE. The provisions of this contract shall become effective on the date hereof, and the charges provided for herein commence on the effective date, unless other Page 16 Packet Page 699 of 895 provisions have been made. SECTION 14. WAIVER. No waiver by either party of any term or condition of this agreement shall be deemed or construed as a waiver of any other term or condition, nor shall a waiver of any breach be deemed to constitute a waiver of any subsequent breach, whether of the same or a different provision of this agreement. SECTION 15. REMEDIES. In addition to the remedies provided by law, this contract shall be specifically enforceable by either party. SECTION 16. ENTIRETY. This agreement merges and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, and agreements between the parties hereto relating to the subject matter hereof, and con- stitues the entire contract between Edmonds and Lynnwood concern- ing the disposal of sewage by either City and the acceptance of such sewage by the other for disposal and treatment. SECTION 17. TERMINATION. This agreement shall remain in effect until its termination is mutually agreed upon by both parties. IN WITLESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the clay and year first above written. Page 17 Packet Page 700 of 895 ATT "T, f CITY CLERK ATTEST: CITY CLERK ?a CITY OF LY By: MAYOR CITY OF EDMONDS J1 MAYOR Page 18 Packet Page 701 of 895 STATE OF WASHINGTON) )ss COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this � C, day. of L� Ci s L� c?�u , 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared f)-roc_ ..•�. t_- /�� 2./� tr. C. t�.n s[_.: and me known to be the Mayor and the City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Edmonds, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the official seal of said municipal. corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed. the day and year first above written. ota y Public in and for the 5ta e of Washington, residing at STATE OF WASHINGTON) )as COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) On this 26th day of October , 1982, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared 14. J. Hrdlicka R. W. Noack and to me known to be the Mayor and the City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Lynnwood, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the official seal of said municipal corporation. WITNESS my hand and year first above written. official seal hereto affixed the day and ary Pub xc in and f or the Late of Washing to e iding at Pag 19 Packet Page 702 of 895 0 � 6 1959 CNGINURING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR JOINT USE OF SANITARY SEWERAGE FACILITIES BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS AND CITY OF LYNNWOOD THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed this 23rd day of October , 1989, by and between the Cities of Lynnwood and Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as "Lynnwood" and "Edmonds"; both being municipal corporations of the State of Washington and located in Snohomish County, Washington. W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, on October 26, 1982, Edmonds and Lynnwood entered into an agreement to accomplish the joint treatment and disposal of the sanitary sewage collected by the two cities, specifying the operation, maintenance, joint use and the payment thereof for those sewerage works facilities to be jointly used, and defining the rights, duties and obligations of the parties; and WHEREAS, the October 26, 1982 agreement permits the serving City supplying sewerage facilities to the purchasing City to provide additional sewerage facilities to the purchasing City if the increase is deemed feasible based upon review of the reserve bapacities of the serving City; and WHEREAS, upon Edmonds' inquiry, Lynnwood requested that Edmonds reserve a maximum capacity for .Lynnwood at the Edmonds treatment plant of two hundred (200) connections, an increase from the previously allocated one hundred nineteen. (119) connections; and WHEREAS, Edmonds requested that its capacity at the Lynnwood treatment plant be increased from six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) to nine hundred twenty thousand (920,000) gallons per day (hereinafter "gd"); and WHEREAS, design capacity at the Lynnwood treatment plant was not increased by 300,000 gd for Edmonds; and WHEREAS, instead of .increasing the capacity, a diversion of Lynnwood flows will be made to vacate enough capacity at the Lynnwood treatment plant to accommodate up to three hundred thousand (300,000) additional gd for Edmonds; and 1 Packet Page 703 of 895 WHEREAS, Edmonds treatment plant has the capacity to accommodate a diversion of up to three hundred thousand (300,000) gd from Lynnwood for the purpose of freeing up capacity for between six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) and nine hundred twenty thousand (920,000) gd for additional flows from Edmonds at the Lynnwood treatment plant; and WHEREAS, Edmonds has provided enough transmission capacity for implementing the diversion when necessary; and WHEREAS, Edmonds has the right to deliver six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) gd to the Lynnwood treatment plant; and WHEREAS, Edmonds will not be required to participate in any further expansion of the Lynnwood treatment plant for capacity unless Edmonds' flows exceed nine hundred twenty thousand (920,000) gd; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the said parties hereby agree as follows: Section 1. INCORPORATION OF PREVIOUS AGREEMENT. This agreement will serve as an amendment to the October 26, 1982 _ Agreement for Joint Use of Sanitary Sewerage Facilities Between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 2. DEFINITION OF TERMS. For the purposes of the Agreement, the following are defined terms: A. The term "diversion" shall mean the transmission of Lynnwood sewage flows to Edmonds beyond Lynnwood's allocated capacity at the Edmonds treatment plant for the purpose of vacating sufficient capacity in the Lynnwood treatment plant for Edmonds flows which exceed six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) gd. Section 3. DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE OF ADDITIONAL SEWAGE. Presently, each City is reserving a capacity of three hundred thousand (300,000) gd, based on average annual daily flows, in its wastewater treatment plant for the other city. Each party agrees that, at a time when Edmonds reaches the limit of its allocated capacity at the Lynnwood plant of six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) gd, Lynnwood shall make additional capacity available for 2 Packet Page 704 of 895 Edmonds flows of up to three hundred thousand (300,000) additional gd, by diverting Lynnwood sewage to the Edmonds plant. The amount of sewage diverted shall be optional to each city, but shall not exceed three hundred thousand (300,000) gd without prior written consent and agreement. Lynnwood agrees to be responsible for monitoring the capacity of its plant, to inform Edmonds when diversion becomes necessary, and to make arrangements for said diversion. The Lynnwood capacity at the Edmonds treatment plant is two hundred (200) connections plus three hundred thousand (300,000) gd upon execution of this agreement. Section 4. PAYMENT. The payment plant agreed to by each party in the October 26, 1982 agreement is still in effect, in all its facets, subject to the following: The capital costs of providing three hundred thousand (300,000) gd capacity at each plant shall not be charged to the other city. Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. The provisions of this amendment shall become effective on the date this agreement is signed and the charges provided for herein commence on the effective date, unless other provisions have been made. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties have executed this agreement as of this 23rd day of October , 1989. ATTEST: By: /iJt d CQUELINE G. PARRETT, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: W. VCM S D City Attorney 3 CITY OF LYNNWOOD By: -W v&/� M. J H- hbLICKA, Mayor By: ABERT W. OACK City Clerk Packet Page 705 of 895 I EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF JOINT SEWER AREAS FOR CITY OF EDMONDS AREA E1A Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 19, Township 27 North , Range 4 East W.M., situate in Snohomish County, State of Washington, this being on the centerlines of 76th AVENUE WEST and 212th STREET S.W.; thence northerly along said centerline to an intersection with a line extended from the north line of LOT 11, WILLOWDALE GARDENS DIVISION NO. 1; said point being the True Point of Beginning ,for AREAS El and Ll; thence west to the northeast corner of said LOT Il, thence south to the southeast corner of said LOT 11; thence west to the southwest corner of said LOT 11; thence north along west lanes of LOTS 11, 10, 9, 8, and 7 of WILLOWDALE GARDENS DIVISION NO. 1, to the northwest corner of said LOT 7; thence east along the north line of said LOT 7 to its midpoint; thence north across LOT 6, WILLOWDALE GARDENS DIVISION NO. 1 to the midpoint of the north line of said LOT 6; thence north to the midpoint of the south line of LOT 7, EDGEWOOD MANOR, L.E. NESS ADDITION; thence north to the midpoint of the north line of said LOT 7; thence west to the southeast corner of LOT 4, EDGEWOOD MANOR, DIVISION NO. 2; thence north along east Lanes of LOTS 4, 3, 2, and 1, said DIVISION NO. 2, to the northeast corner of said LOT 1; thence north along the west lines of LOTS 2 and 1 WILLOWDALE GARDENS DIVISION NO. 1, to the northwest corner of said LOT 1; thence east along north line of said LOT 1 to a point approximately 105 feet Page B1 of 19 Packet Page 706 of 895 west of the northeast corner of said LOT 1; thence north parallel to 76th AVENUE WEST to the south right-of-way boundary of 203rd STREET SOUTHWEST; thence northwesterly to the southeast corner of LOT 1, 5-60-78; thence north to the northeast corner of said LOT 1; thence east to the southeast corner of LOT 2, 5-60-78; thence north to the northeast corner of said LOT 2; thence east to the southwest corner of LOT 18, MEADOW PARK ADDITION; thence north to the northwest corner of LOT 1, MEADOW. PARK ADDITION; thence northeasterly to the midpoint of the south line of BLOCK 10, CENTRAL PARK ADDITION; thence north to the midpoint of the north line of BLOCK 1, CENTRAL PARK ADDITION; thence northwesterly to the southwest corner of RT-18, SECTION 19; thence north to the northwest corner of said RT-13; thence west to the southwest corner of 5-14-79; thence west to the northwest corner of RT--1G-1, SECTION 19; thence south to the southeast corner of RT--1G, SECTION 19; thence west to the southwest- corner of said RT-1G; thence north to the southeast corner of RT--1N, SECTION 19; thence west along the south lines of RT--lN, SECTION 19, RT-1H1, SECTION 19; thence continuing west along said line to an intersection with the East line of RT--1E-1, SECTION 19; thence south to the southeast corner of said RT-lE-1; thence west to the southwest corner of RT-lE-2, SECTION 19; thence along a line continued from said corner to an intersection with the east right-of-way boundary of Both AVENUE WEST; thence south to an intersection with a lane extended from the south line of LOT B, MAPLEWOOD GROVE; thence west along south lines of GOT> B and 11, MAPLEWOOD Page B2 of 19 Packet Page 707 of 895 GROVE to the southwest corner of said LOT 11; thence west to the northwest corner of LOT 1, VALLEY HI; thence south to the southwest corner of said LOT 1; thence west to the southwest corner of LOT 18, VALLEY HI; thence north along the west lines of LOTS 18 through 10, VALLEY HI, to the northwest corner of said LOT 10; thence west to the southeast corner of LOT 8, TAMIWOOD; thence north along the east line of LOTS 8 through 4, TAMIWOOD, to the northeast corner of said LOT 4; thence west to the northwest corner of said LOT 4; thence northerly to the northeast corner of LOT 27, TAMIWOOD; thence west to the northwest corner of said LOT 27; thence north to the southeast corner of LOT 4, ROBERT E. THOMAS ADDITION; thence west to the southwest corner of LOT 2, said ADDITION; thence north to the northwest corner of said LOT 2; thence continuing north to an intersection with the north line of the northeast 1/4 of SECTION 19, this being on the centerline of 196th STREET SOUTHWEST, at a distance of 102.5 feet more or less east of the southwest corner of the southeast 1/4 of SECTION 18, Township 27 North, Range 4 East G.M., situate in Snohomish County, Washington; thence continuing north to the north right-of-way boundary of 196th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence west along last said boundary to the southwest courner of RT-27, SECTION 18; thence north to the northwest corner of said RT-27; thence west to the southwest corner of RT-27C-2, SECTION 18; thence north to the northwest corner of RT-27C--1, SECTION 18; thence east to the midpoint of the south line of RT--27B, SECTION 18; thence north, parallel to 84th AVENUE WEST to the midpoint of the north line of LOT 34, MAPLEWOOD Page B3 of 19 Packet Page 708 of 895 GARDENS, UNRECORDED; thence west along said north line to an intersection with a line 174 feet from, and parallel to the west right-of-way boundary of 84th AVENUE WEST; thence north along said parallel line to an intersection with the south line of SEAVIEW ESTATES, NO. 2; thence east to the southwest corner of LOT 6, SEAVIEW ESTATES NO. 2; thence north to the northwest corner of LOT 1, SEAVIEW ESTATES NO. 2; thence east along the north line of said LOT 1, a distance of 6 feet more or less; thence north, parallel to 84th AVENUE WEST, to an intersection with the south line of TRACT 20, EDMONDS SEAVIEW TRACTS; thence west along said south line, a distance of 48.6 feet more or less; thence north, parallel to 84th AVENUE WEST, to an intersection with a line 133 feet more or .less south of, and parallel to, the south right-of-way boundary of 188th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence east along said parallel line, a distance of 60 feet more or less; thence north, parallel to 84th AVENUE WEST, to an intersection with the north right-of-way boundary of 188th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence east along said boundary, to the southwest corner of LOT 22, SEAVIEW FOREST TRACTS; thence north along the west lines of LOTS 22, 21, 8, and 7 of said TRACTS, and along the west line of LOT 3, SEAVIEW FOREST TRACTS, DIVISION NO. 3, to the northwest corner of said LOT 3; thence east to the northeast corner of said LOT 3; thence north to the northwest corner of LOT 6 of said TRACTS DIVISION NO. 3; thence east to the northeast corner of said LOT 6; thence east to the southwest corner of RT--13A-4, SECTION 18; thence north to the northwest corner of said RT-13A-4; thence continue to an intersection Page B4 of 19 Packet Page 709 of 895 with the north right--of--way boundary of 184 th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence east along said boundary to an intersection with the west line of RT-5E, SECTION 18; thence north along said *west line, a distance of 150 feet more or less; thence east to the northwest corner of LOT 17, BLOCK 18, FIRST ADDITION TO CITY OF EDMONDS; thence east to the northeast corner of said LOT 17; thence north parallel to ANDOVER STREET, to an intersection with the south line of LOT 11, SEAVIEW VILLAGE; thence east along said south line and along the south line of LOT 10, SEAVIEW VILLAGE, to an intersection with the west right-of-way boundary of 81st AVENUE WEST; thence north along said boundary to an intersection with the north right -of --way boundary of 183rd STREET SOUTHWEST; thence east to an intersection with the east line of SEAVIEW VILLAGE; thence northerly along said east line to the northwest corner of LOT 4, DYER'S HOMES; thence east to the southwest corner of LOT 4, SEAVIEW FIRS; thence north to the northwest corner of LOT 3, SEAVIEW FIRS; thence east along the north line of SEAVIEW FIRS, to an intersection with the west right-of-way boundary of 80th AVENUE WEST; thence north along last said boundary to an intersection with the north right--of-way boundary of 180th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence east along last said boundary continued to an intersection with the east right-of-way boundary of OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE; thence southeasterly along last said boundary to an intersection with the north lane of LOT 1, BLOCK 2, ADMIRALTY ACRES; thence east along said north line to an intersection with the west right -of --way boundary of 76th AVENUE WEST; thence Page B5 of 19 Packet Page 710 of 895 northerly along last said boundary to an intersection with the south line of RT--30, SECTION 7, said point being on the north line of Snohomish County Park; thence west along said north line to the southwest corner of LOT 53, TALBOT PARK; thence south to the southeast corner of LOT 43, TALBOT PARK; said corner being also the northeast corner of LOT 5, TALBOT SEAVIEW ADDITION, SECTION 18, thence south along the east line of said LOT 5, to an intersection with the northerly right--of--way boundary of OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE; thence southwesterly along last said boundary to an intersection with the extended southerly line of LOT 22, PLAT OF MAPLE MANOR, UNRECORDED; thence northwesterly along said southerly line to the southwest corner of said LOT 22; thence northeasterly along the east boundary to the Great Northern Railway right--of-way to an intersection with the south line of that Government Lot Barked "J.C. LUND'S RESERVE", said intersection being 58 feet more or less north of, and 60 feet more or less west of the northwest corner of TRACT 13, LUND'S MEADOWDALE TRACTS, and said intersection being also on the northerly boundary of the City of Edmonds, Washington, as described in City of Edmonds Ordinance No. 1004, dated August 1, 1963; thence easterly along said northerly boundary of the City of Edmonds, being also the northerly right-of-way boundary of LUND'S GULCH ROAD (not open), and being also the southerly lines of that Government Lot marked "J.C. LUND'S RESERVE" and of TRACTS 51 and 52, LUND'S MEADOWDALE TRACTS, to an intersection with the east right-of-way boundary of 68th AVENUE WEST (vacated), at a distance of 390 .feet more or Page B6 of 19 Packet Page 711 of 895 Less north of the southwest corner of TRACT 13, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH; thence southerly along the said east right-of-way boundary of 68th AVENUE WEST to an intersection with 'the south right-of-way boundary of NORTH MEADOWDALE ROAD; thence northwesterly along said boundary to an intersection with a line 270 feet more or less south of, and parallel to, the north line of SECTION 8, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; thence west along said parallel line to an intersection with the west line of TRACT 83, PLAT OF MEADOWDALF BEACH; thence south to the southwest corner of said TRACT 83; thence west to northwest corner of TRACT 106 of said plat; thence south to the southwest corner of TRACT 117 of said Plat; thence east to the southeast corner of TRACT 114 of said plat; thence continue to an intersection with the west right-of-way boundary of OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE; thence southwesterly along last said boundary to the southeast corner of TRACT 154, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH; thence west to the southwest corner of TRACT 155 of said plat; thence southwesterly along the easterly right-of-way boundary of 72nd AVENUE WEST, to an intersection with the north right-of-way boundary of 180th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence southeasterly to the northwest corner of RT-10A, SECTION 17; thence south along west line of said RT--10A to an intersection with the extended south line of LOT 1, PLAT OF HOMEVIEW ADDITION NO. 1, SECTION 17, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; thence west to the northwest corner of LOT 78, PLAT OF HOMEVIEW ADDITION NO. 2; thence southerly along the west line of said LOT 78, to an intersection with the extended south line of LOT 8 of last-named plat; thence Page B7 of 19 Packet Page 712 of 895 westerly along said south line to the southwest corner of LOT 1, HOMEVIEW ADDITION NO. 2; thence continue along said line to an intersection with the east right-of-way boundary of 76th AVENUE WEST; thence southerly along said boundary of 76th AVENUE WEST to an intersection with the south right-of-way boundary of OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE; thence west to the centerline of 76th AVENUE WEST; thence southerly along said centerline to an intersection with the extended north line of LOT 14, BLOCK 1,� PARK ADDITION; thence west to the northwest corner of LOT 8, BLOCK 1, PARK ADDITION; thence south to the southwest corner of said LOT 8; thence continue to an intersection with the south line of SECTION 18, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M., this being on the centerline of 196th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence southwesterly to the northeast corner of RT-2B, SECTION 19, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; thence south to the southeast corner of said RT-2B; thence east to the northeast corner of LOT 14, SANDALWOOD NO. 2; thence south along east lines of LOTS 14, 15, and 16, SANDALWOOD NO. 2, to the southeast corner of said LOT 16; thence continue to an intersection with the south right-of-way boundary of 199th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence east along said boundary to the northeast corner of S--14-79; thence continue east to the centerline of 76th AVENUE WEST; thence southerly along said centerline of 76th AVENUE WEST to the True point of Beginning for AREAS El and L1 EXCEPT that portion of the Lynnwood Treatment Plant area within AREA LIB, and EXCEPT that portion hereinafter designated as AREA ElB. Page B8 of 19 Packet Page 713 of 895 AREA ElB TRACTS 71, 72 and 84, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH, minus east 10 feet of said TRACTS, together with that right--of-way lying south -of TRACT 72, and North of TRACT 84 and extending from [lest boundaries of said TRACTS, to the East boundaries thereof, all in Sections 5 and 8, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, G.M.; said area containing 12.6 acres. That portion of developed area of the pier commonly known as the Laebugten Wharf, lying within TRACTS 2 through 11, PLAT OF MEADOWDAL.E TIDELANDS, Sections 5 and b, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M., situate in Snohomish County, Washington; said area containing 2.0 Acres, more or less. Page 89 of 19 Packet Page 714 of 895 EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF JOINT SEWER AREA FOR CITY OF LYNNWOOD AREA L1A Beginning at the southwest corner SECTION 20, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M., Snohomish County, State of Washington, said corner being on the centerlines of 76th AVENUE WEST AND 212th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence northerly along the centerline of 76th AVENUE WEST to its intersection with the centerline of 208th STREET SOUTHINEST, said point being the True Point of Beginning of AREA "Ll"; thence east along said centerline to its intersection with the extended west line of LOT 9, PLAT OF AURORA HEIGHTS; thence south along said extended west line to the southwest corner of said LOT 9; thence east to the southeast corner of said LOT 9; thence south along the west line of LOT 5, BLOCK 1, SEATTLE HEIGHTS DIVISION NO. 4, to the southwest corner of said LOT 5; thence east along the extended south line of LOTS 5, 4, and 3, of said PLAT to its intersection with a line 20 feet from and parallel to the east right-of-way boundary of 70th AVENUE WEST; thence north along said parallel line, 235.68 feet more or less to its intersection with the extended south line of LOT 12, HOYT ACRES; thence east along said extended south .sine 223.23 feet; thence south to the southwest corner of LOT 7, HOYT ACRES; thence east along the extended south line of said LOT 7 to its intersection with the centerline of SR-99; thence southwesterly along the centerline of SR-99 to the extended line that bears S67003'E from a Point on the east right-of-way boundary of SR-99, said point being 359.25 Page B10 of 19 Packet Page 715 of 895 feet south of the north line of LOT 31, SOLNER'S FIVE ACRE TRACTS, measured along the east right-of-way boundary of SR-99; thence southeasterly to the north right-of-way boundary of the PACIFIC NORTHWEST TRACTION COMPANY right--of--way; thence northeasterly alone} said boundary to its intersection with the northerly right-of-way boundary of 212th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence easterly along last said boundary to its intersection with the east dine of the PLAT OF MIRIAM PARK; thence north along said east line to its .intersection with the north line of said PLAT; thence west along said north line continued to its intersection with the southernmost point on ASSESSOR'S LOT NO. 4-038, SECTION 21, said point being on the northwesterly right -of --way boundary of INTERSTATE 5; thence northeasterly along said boundary to its intersection with the southeast boundary of PACIFIC NORTHWEST TRACTION COMPANY right-of-way; thence northeasterly along last said boundary to its intersection with the east right-of-way boundary of 44th AVENUE WEST; thence continuing northeasterly along the `southeast boundary of the PACIFIC NORTHWEST TRACTION COMPANY right-of-way to the extended south right-of-way boundary of 195th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence west along said boundary to its intersection with the northwesterly boundary of PACIFIC NORTHWEST TRACTION COMPANY right-of-way; thence northeasterly along last said boundary to its intersection with the extended northeasterly line of TRACT 18, BLOCK 2, ALDERWOOD MANOR; thence southeasterly along last said extended line of TRACT A to its intersection with the southeasterly boundary of PUGCT SOUND POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY right-of-way; thence northeasterly along last Page B11 of 19 Packet Page 716 of 895 said boundary to a point of intersection with an extension of the east line of LOT 14, BLOCK 4, ALDERWOOD MANOR NO. 3; thence north along said east line to its intersection with the northwesterly right-of-way boundary of BEECH ROAD; thence northeasterly along last said boundary to its intersection with the south line of LOT 5, BLOCK 4, ALDERWOOD MANOR NO. 3; thence west along said south line to the southeast corner of LOT 3, said BLOCK 4; then.ce north along the east line of LOT 3 approximately 460 feet more or less; thence west parallel. to 182nd STREET SOUTHWEST to an intersection with the east line of SECTION 15, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; thence north along said east line to the northeast corner of said SECTION 15; thence west along the north line of said SECTION 15, to an intersection with the westerly right-of-way boundary of 36th AVENUE WEST; thence north along last said boundary to its intersection with the southerly right-of-way boundary of 164th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence westerly along last said boundary to its intersection with the easterly right--of-way boundary of SR-99; thence northwesterly to the southeast corner of LOT 6, BLOCK 1, ALDERWOOD MANOR NO. 4, said point being on the westerly boundary of SR-99; thence northerly along the east lines of LOTS 6, 7, and 8, BLOCK 1, ALDERWOOD MANOR NO. 4, to the northeast corner of said Lot 8; thence northwesterly to the northeast corner of the northwest 1/4, SECTION 5, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; thence west along the north line of said SECTION 5 to its intersection with the easterly right--of-way boundary of GREAT NORTHERN R.Y,; thence southerly along last said boundary to its intersection with the south line of that. Government Lot Page. B12 of 19 Packet Page 717 of 895 marked "J.C. LUND'S RESERVE" r said intersection tieing 58 feet more or less north of, and 60 feet more or less west of the northwest corner Of TRACT 13, LUND'S MEADOWDALE TRACTS, and said intersection being also on the northerly boundary of the City of Edmonds, Washington, as described in City of Edmonds' Ordinance No.' 1004, dated August 1, 1963; thence easterly along said northerly boundary of the City of Edmonds, being also the northerly right -of --way boundary of LUND'S GULCH ROAD (not open)-, and being also the southerly lines of that Government Lot marked "O.C. LUND'S RESERVE" and of TRACTS 51 and 52, LUND'S MEADOWDALE TRACTS, to an intersection with the east right--of-way boundary of 68th AVENUE WEST (vacated), at a distance of. 390 feet more or less, north of the southwest corner of TRACT 13, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH; thence southerly along the said east right-of-way boundary of 68th AVENUE WEST to an intersection with the south right -of --way boundary of NORTH MEADOWDALE ROAD; thence northwesterly along said boundary to an intersection with a line approximately 270 feet more or less from, and parallel to, the north line of SECTION 8, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; thence west along said parallel line to an intersection with the west line of TRACT B3, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE BEACH; thence south to the southwest corner of said TRACT 83; thence west to the northwest corner of TRACT 106 of said PLAT; thence south to the southwest corner of TRACT 117 of said PLAT; thence east to the southeast corner of TRACT 114 of said PLAT; thence continue to an intersection with the west right-of-way boundary of OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE; thence southwesterly along said west boundary to the southeast corner of TRACT 154, PLAT Page B13 of 19 Packet Page 718 of 895 OF MEADOWDALE BEACH; thence west to the southwest corner of TRACT 155 of said PLAT; thence southwesterly along the east right-of-way boundary of 72nd AVENUE WEST, to an intersection with the north right-of-way boundary of 180th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence east to an intersection with the east right-of-way boundary of 72nd AVENGE WEST extended from south of 180th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence south along said boundary to an intersection with a line extended from the south line of LOT 1, PLAT OF HOMEVIEW ADDITION NO. 1, SECTION 17, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; thence west to the northwest corner of LOT 78, PLAT OF HOMEVIEW ADDITION NO. 2; thence south along the west line of said LOT 78, to an intersection with a line extended from the south line of LOT 8 of last named PLAT; thence west along said south line to the southwest corner of LOT 1, HOMEVIEW ADDITION NO. 2, said SECTION 17; thence continue said line to an intersection with the east right-of-way boundary of 76th AVENUE WEST; said intersection lying in SECTION 18, Township 27 North., Range 4 East, W.M.; thence southerly along east right -of --way boundary of 76th AVENUE WEST, to an intersection with the south right-of-way boundary of OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE; thence west to the centerline of 76th AVENUE WEST; thence southerly along said centerline to an intersection with extended north line of LOT 14, BLOCK 1, PARK ADDITION; thence west to the northwest corner of LOT 8, BLOCK 1, PARK ADDITION; thence south to the southwest corner- of said LOT 8; thence continue • to an intersection with the south line of SECTION 18, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M., this being on the Pag` B14 of 19 Packet Page 719 of 895 centerline of 196th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence southwesterly to the northeast corner of RT-2B, SECTION 19, Township 27 North, Range. 4 East, W.M.; thence south to the southeast corner of said RT--2B; thence east to the northeast corner of LOT 14, SANDALWOOD NO. 2; thence south along east lines of LOTS 14, 15, and 16, SANDALWOOD NO. 2, to the southeast corner of said LOT 16; thence continue to an intersection with the south right-of-way boundary line of 199th STREET SOUTHWEST; thence east along said boundary to the northeast corner of S-14--79 ; thence continue east to the centerline of 76th AVENUE WEST; thence southerly along said centerline of 76th AVENUE WEST to the True Point of Beginning for AREA "Ll"; EXCEPT that portion hereinafter designated as AREA "L2". Page B15 of 19 Packet Page 720 of 895 AREA LlB (Include) Commencing at the East quarter corner of SECTION 7, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M., and proceeding thence along the centerline of 76th AVENUE WEST (also known as MEADOWDALE ROAD) North 1011'45" East 602.27 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence North 61033'10" West 22.50 feet to the point of intersection of the westerly line of 76th AVENUE WEST and the southwesterly line of BROWN'S POINT ROAD (also known as BERTOLA ROAD) as recorded under Auditor's file No. 733197; thence northwesterly, northerly and northeasterly along the southwesterly, westerly and northwesterly line of said BRO�lN'S POINT ROAD, with the .following courses, curves and distances- �dorth 61033'10" west 198.53 feet, on a curve to the right having a radius of 120.00 feet a distance of 80.69 feet; North 23001'30" West 141.15 feet; North 9021'30" West 76.47 feet, on a curve to the right having a radius of 170.00 feet a distance of 67,93 feet; north 13032'10" East 4.07 feet; thence N 89003'05" West 146.80 feet; thence N30000'W, 139.92 feet; thence N89003'05"W, 476.72 feet to the Government meander line; thence southwesterly along said Government meander line to the south corner of LOT 2, EDMONDS TIDE LANDS; thence northerly along west line of said LOT 2, to a point on the south line of LOT 43, PLAT OF MEADOWDALE TIDE LANDS; thence along said south line to the westerly lane of said LOT 43; thence northerly along the westerly line of LOT 43 and LOT 42 of said PLAT to the north line of said LOT 42; Page B16 of 19 Packet Page 721 of 895 thence easterly along said North line and the easterly projection thereof, to an intersection with the Easterly Fight -of -way line of the GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY; thence southwesterly along said right-of-way line to the north line of GOVERNME14T LOT 2, SECTION 7, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; thence S89003'05"E, along said north line to a point which is S89003'05"E, 538.90 feet from said Government meander line; thence S38005141"E, 193.14 feet; thence N89003105"W, 29.65 feet to a point on the easterly line of the aforementioned BROWN'S POINT ROAD; thence southwesterly, southerly and southeasterly along the southeasterly, easterly, and northeasterly line of said BROWN'S POINT ROAD and the projection thereof to its intersection with the centerline of 76th AVENUE WEST; thence Sloll'45"W, 45.0 feet to the True Point of Beginning. AREA L2 TRACTS 106, 116, and 117, PLAT OF MFAnOWDALE BEACH, all in SECTION 8, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M., Snohomish County, Washington; said area containing 31.4 acres more or less, all as shown on EXHIBIT "A", attached hereto. AREA L3 Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Southeast 1/4, Southwest 1/4, SECTION 20, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.,; Snohomish County, State of Washington; thence West 672.13 feet more or less; thence North 30 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence West 455.23 feet more or less to Page B17 of 19 Packet Page 722 of 895 its intersection with the extended West line of LOT 9, PLAT OF AURORA HEIGHTS; thence South 70 feet to the Northwest corner of LOT 9, PLAT OF AURORA HEIGHTS; thence continue the sage course 292.26 feet to the Southwest corner of LOT 9, PLAT OF AURORA HEIGHTS; thence East 104.02 feet along the South line of LOT 9 of said PLAT OF AURORA HEIGHTS; thence South 302.04 feet along the West .line of LOT 5, BLOCK 1, SEATTLE HEIGHTS DIVISION NO. 4; thence East 352.9 feet along the extended South line of LOTS 3, 4, and 5, PLAT OF SEATTLE HEIGHTS DIVISION NO. 4; thence North 267.47 feet; thence East 356.98 feet; thence North 150.03 feet more or less; thence West 357.13 feet; thence North 252.50 feet to the True Point of Beginning. TOGETHER with LOTS 7 through 12 inclusive, HOYT ACRES, less the North 30.0 feet of LOT 12 as measured at right angles to the North lane of said LOT 12; plus that portion of the Fast half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest corner -of SECTION 20, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; beginning at the Southwest corner of LOT 7, HOYT ACRES. thence North 361.46 feet to a point on the South line of LOT 12, said HOYT ACRES projected West; thence East along said extended South line of LOT 12, 181.23 feet to the Southwest corner of said LOT 12; thence along the Westerly boundary of LOTS 7 through 11, said HOYT ACRES, 399.16 feet to the Point of Beginning; plus that portion of the East half of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of SECTION 20, Township 27 North, Range 4 East, W.,M.,; beginning at the Northwest corner of Page 318 of 19 Packet Page 723 of 895 LOT 12, HOYT ACRES; thence along the t-lest line of LOT 12 for a distance of 33.14 feet, to a point that is 30.0 feet South of the North line of LOT 12, as measured at right angles; thence West for a distance of 60.0 feet; thence Southwest for a distance of 19.14 feet; thence West for a distance of 366.98 feet more or less to the center of 70TH AVENUE WEST; thence South along said centerline for a distance of 25.0 feet; thence East for a distance of 414.44 feet more or less to the Southwest corner of LOT 12, HOYT ACRES; thence Northeast for a distance of 46.76 feet more or less to the True Point of Beginning. EXCEPT the Westerly portion deeded for road purposes for 70TH AVENUE WEST. Page B19 of 19 Packet Page 724 of 895 Packet Page 725 of 895 EXHIBIT "C" DESCRIPTIONS OF JOINT SEWERAGE SYSTEMS PART 1 The term "joint sewerage system Part 1" shall mean the presently existing facilities owned and operated by Lynnwood consisting of a sewage treatment facility and truck sewers being located as follows: UNIT 1.: Beginning at the intersection of 208th ST. S.W. with 76th AVE. W. and thence northerly in and along 76TH AVE. W. to the LYNNWOOD sewage treatment plant, UNIT 3A. UNIT 2A: Beginning at the intersection of OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE with 76TH AVE. W., thence east and northeasterly in and along OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE TO 180TH ST. S.W.; thence easterly in and along 1BOTH ST. S.W. a distance of 200' more or Less; thence northerly in and along an easement and parallel .with 68TH AVE. W. to 176th ST. S.W.; thence northeasterly parallel with OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE to an intersection with 173RD ST. S.W. UNIT 2B: Beginning at the north end of UNIT 2A; thence northwesterly to OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE; thence northeasterly in and along OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE to its intersection with 168TH ST. S.W. UNIT 2C: Beginning at the north end of UNIT 2B; thence west along 168TH ST. S.W. to an intersection with 63RD AVE. W.; Page C1 of 8 Packet Page 726 of 895 thence north along 63RD AVE. W. and easement to an intersection with an easement along the south line of WREN GLEN NCB. 2, Section 8, Township 27 North, Range 4 east W.M. ; thence west along last said easement to an intersection with 64TH AVE. W.; thence north to an intersection with 165TH PL. S.W.; thence west in and along 165TH PL. S.W. and easement to an intersection with 66TH AVE. W.; thence south to an intersection with NORTH MEADOWDALE ROAD; thence westerly in and along said road to an intersection with 68TH AVE W.; thence north in and along 68TH AVE. W. to an intersection with 164TH ST. S.W.; TOGETHER with the sewage treatment plant constructed as UNIT 9A; and the outfall sewer constructed as UNIT 9B, all as shown on EXHIBIT "A", attached hereto; and TOGETHER with such replacement, additions 'or betterments thereto which may be constructed in the future for .the joint benefits of the parties hereto. PART 2 The term "joint sewerage system Part 2" shall mean the presently existing facilities owned and operated by Edmonds consisting of a system of 8" trunk sewers being located as follows UNIT 3: Beginning at the intersection of MEADOWDALE BEACH ROAD with 72MD AVE. W.; thence northwesterly and westerly in Page C2 of 8 Packet Page 727 of 895 and along MEADOWDALE BEACH ROAD to 76TH AVE. W.; thence south in and along 76TH AVE. W. a distance of 157' more or less; thence northwesterly 100' more or less; thence southwesterly 148' more or less; thence westerly to a point of connection with existing LYNNWOOD 24" sewer on approximate centerline of BERTOI,A ROAD; said section containing approximately 2,380 lineal feet of sewer lanes all as shown on EXHIBIT "A", attached hereto; and TOGETHER with such replacements, additions or betterments thereto which may be cons-tructed in the future for the joint benefits of the parties hereto. PART 3 The term "joint sewerage system Part 3" shall mean the presently existing facilities owned, operated and maintained as set forth below and consisting of: UNIT 4: 1,248 lineal feet of 8" sewer constructed in 1967 pursuant to 2SR-218 and ESR-269 plus 775 lineal feet of 8" sewer constructed in 1964 pursuant to ESR-221; both presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds, and located as follows: Beginning at a point 115' more of less south of the intersection of 210TH S.W. and 70TH AVE. W.; thence south 543' more or less in and along 70TH AVE. W. to an intersection with 212TH ST. S.W.; thence west 705' more or less in and along 212TH ST-. S.W. to an intersection with 72ND Page C3 of 8 Packet Page 728 of 895 AVE 1q.; from said intersection, stub north 35' more or less; also from said intersection, bearing south in and along 72ND AVE. W., 705' more or less to a connection with UNIT 5. UNIT 5: 785 lineal feet of 8" sewer, 1,440 lineal feet of 4" force main, 1,462 lineal feet of 10" sewer and 130 lineal feet of 12" sewer, together with a pump station, all constructed in 1964 pursuant to DID-119 and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds and located as follows: Continuing from UNIT 4 connection, south 600' more or less in and along 72ND AVE. W- to an intersectsion with 216TH ST. S.W.; thence east 185' more or less in and along 216TH ST. S.W. to the pump station situated west of U.S. HIGHWAY 99; thence southwesterly by force main in and along U.S. HIGHWAY 99, a distance of 1,440' more or less to an intersection with 220TH ST. S.W.; thence southwesterly 1,462 more or less in and along U.S. HIGHWAY 99 to an intersection with 224TH ST. S.W.; thence east in and along 224TH ST. S.W. 130' more or less to a connection with UNIT 6. UNIT 5A: 1,440 lineal feet of 8" force main constructed in 1979 to increase capacity to meet present and future needs and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds and located as follows: Continuing from UNIT 5 pump station at 216TH ST. S.W.; thence southwesterly in and along U.S. HIGHWAY 99 to 220TH ST. S.W. connection with UNIT 5. Page C4 of 8 Packet Page 729 of 895 UNIT 6: 3,921 lineal feet of 12" sewer and 38 lineal feet of 15" sewer, all constructed in 1963 pursuant to LID-108 and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds and located as follows: Continuing from UNIT 5 connection in 224TH ST. S.W.; thence east 454' more or less in and along 224TH ST. S.W. to an intersection with 73RD AVE. W.; thence south 664' more or less in and along-73RD AVE. W. to an intersection with an easement along the north line of LAKE: BALLINGER HOMES NO. 2, Section 29, township 27 north, Range 4 east W.M.; thence east 394' more or less in and along said easement to an intersection with the PACIFIC NORTHWEST TRACTION CO. right-of-way; thence southerly in and along said right -of --way, 906' more or less to an intersection with an easement 200' more or less south of 22STEI ST. S.W.; thence southwesterly 162' more or less in and along last said easement to the intersection of 229TH ST. S.W. and .74TH AVE. W . ; thence southerly 412' more or less in and along 74TH AVE. W. to 230TH ST. S.W.; thence southeasterly 194' more or less in and along an easement to an intersection with the PACIFIC NORTHWEST TRACTION CO. right-of-way; thence southerly in and along said right of way 735' more or less to an intersection with 75TH PL. W.; thence southeasterly 38' more or less, crossing said TRACTION CO. right-of-way to a connection with UNIT 7A. UNIT 7A: 3,840 lineal feet of 24" diameter trunk sewer (Ballinger Trunk) constructed jointly by Edmonds and Mountlake Terrace in 1962 pursuant to the joint use agreement Page C5 of 8 Packet Page 730 of 895 dated September 15, 1961, and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds. UNIT 8: The existing sewage lift station constructed by Mountlake Terrace at the southerly end of Lake Ballinger in 1959, and presently owned, operated and maintained by Mountlake Terrace. UNIT 9: 3,246 lineal feet of 18" diameter pressure pipeline constructed by Mountlake Terrace in 1959 along 244th St. S.W. from the said lift station (UNIT 8) to its point of discharge into a gravity trunk sewer (UNIT 10) at U.S. HIGHWAY 99, and presently owned, operated and maintained by Mountlake Terrace. UNIT 10: The existing.. gravity trunk sewer constructed by Mountlake Terrace in 1959 along EDMONDS WAY from U.S. HIGHWAY 99 to 98TH AVE W. in Edmonds, the nost southerly 1,115 lineal feet thereof being 30" diameter pipe and the remainder being of 24" diameter pipe, transferred to jurisdiction, operation and maintenance by Edmonds pursuant to the Joint Use Agreement dated October 5, 1971. UNIT 11: The existing .24" and 30" gravity trunk sewer constructed by Edmonds in 1959 from the end of UNIT 10 at 98TH AVE. W. along EDMONDS WAY and FIFTH AVE. in the City of Edmonds to ELM ST., thence westerly on ELM ST. and northerly to existing treatment plant of the City of Edmonds at SECOND Page C6 of 8 Packet Page 731 of 895 AVE. and DAYTON ST., and presently owned and operated and maintained by Edmonds. UNIT' 12: The original sewage treatment plant at SECOND AVE. and DAYTON ST. in Edmonds, as it existed on February 28, 1959, and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds. UNIT 12A: The existing 36" diameter sewer outfall extending a distance of approximately 1,800 lineal feet from the Edmonds sewage treatment plant into deep salt water, and constructed by Edmonds in 1959, and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds. UNIT 12B: The modifications and additions to the original Edmonds sewage treatment plant (UNIT 12) as constructed by Edmonds in 1959 to expand the original plant capacity for service to Mountlake Terrace under the Joint Use Agreement of February 28, 1959, and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds. UNIT 12C: The modifications and additions to the Edmonds sewage treatment plant as constructed by Edmonds in 1967 for conversion from sludge digestion to a sludge thickening and incineration process for sewage sludge disposal, and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds. UNIT 12D: The additions to the Edmonds sewage treatment Page C7 of 8 Packet Page 732 of 895 plant as constructed by Edmonds in 1971 to increase plant capacity to meet present and future needs, and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds. UNIT 12E: The extension and modification of the existing 36" diameter sewer outfall as constructed by Edmonds in 1971, in compliance with changes in requirements by State agencies, and presently owned, operated and maintained by Edmonds, and ALL as shown on EXHIBIT "B", attached hereto; TOGETHER with such replacements, additions or betterments thereto which may be .constructed in the future for the joint benefits of the parties hereto. Page C8 of 8 Packet Page 733 of 895 G.5 Agreement between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood — November 19, 1987 Packet Page 734 of 895 CITY OF LYNN-WOOD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Bob Alberts, City Engineer City of Edmonds 250 5th Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 98020NG1��R�N� 19100 s4TH AVENUE WEST LYNNVIOOD. WASHINGTON 98035 PHONE 775-1971 November 19, 1987 RE: PARTICIPATION IN LYNNWOOD SECONDARY TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION Dear Bob: Following your request of Loren last Thursday, enclosed is a copy of the City of Lynnwood's Sewerage System Engineering Report for Secondary Treatment dated March 1987, which describes the various treatment alternatives and the proposed process which has subsequently been approved by Washington State DOE for construction at the Lynnwood plant site. You specifically questioned Edmonds' participation for a portion of our plant capacity to be reserved for flow from your area. According to the report, 0.62 mgd is being set aside for flows from the Edmonds system, exclusive of the 300,000 gpd exchange capacity described in my letter of September 15, 1987. Page 4-2 describes the -service area sewage flows that will require a total plant capacity of 5.4 mgd (annual average daily flow) in the year 2010. Your share of the cost would be 11.5%, the proportional amount equal to 0.62/5.40. The estimated project cost for i;he facility is $18,210,000. The City expects a 50% grant which would reduce the capital liability to $9,705,000. Applying your pro -rated share of 11.5%, your cost would be $1,047,075. A description of the various elements included in the total project cost are shown on page 6-5, table 6-1. Your share of the operation maintenance cost would also be based on a proportional amount of your capacity of _the plant. The estimated 0 & M cost for the key years 1992, 2000 and 2010 are shown on page 6-7, table 6-2. Including the exchange capacity with this and other agreements will result in a total Edmonds flow into Lynnwood STP of 920,000 gpd (620,000 f 300,000) and a tota.1_L`ynnwood flow into Edmonds of 480,000 gpd (200 equiv. units @ 900 gpu -t- 300, 000) . -Participation in plant improvements and operation for either city will not reflect the reserve capacity provided by the exchange. Packet Page 735 of 895 Bob Alberts Page 2 November 19, 1987 As we progress through the design phase of the plant and firm the financing of the project, you will be further advised of changes to your anticipated costs. Very truly yours, CITY LYNNWOOD 44t,-4 E. NIMS, P.E. Director of Public Works WEN /smw 171E1 Encl. M Packet Page 736 of 895 A 11 'T iv CITY OF LYNNWOOD PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Peter E. Hahn, Director Community Services City of Edmonds 205 5th Avenue N. Edmonds, WA 9B020 RE: TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY Dear ter. Hahn: 5 --TM - v ENUE WEST LYNN-OC-D. v:-SHINGTON 9BO35 '"-!ONE September 15, 1987 dft'� R"Mk-� This letter confirms our discussions where Lynnwood agrees to trade treatment plant capacity of 300,000 gallons per day between our Lynnwood plant for Edmonds and your Edmonds plant for Lynnwood_ This additional 300,000 gallons per day will be above that capacity agreed to prior to August 12, 1987. This trade of 300,000 GPD additional capacity is to be made at no exchange of funds. Lynnwood will not bill Edmonds for this capacity and vice versa. WEN/smw 23E1 . cc: Mayor Hrdlicka Very truly. yours, iTY OF LYNNWOOD FE.MS, P.E. Director of Public Works Packet Page 737 of 895 G.6 Agreement between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood — May 4, 1990 Packet Page 738 of 895 r 2r r �e tr x' „ AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR JOINT USE OF SANITARY SEWERAGE FACILITIES BETWEEN CITY OF EDMONDS AND CITY OF LYNNWOOD THIS AGREEM Pff, made and executed this -4 day of - "�, 1990, by and between the Cities of Lynnwood and Edmonds, hereinafter referred to as "Lynnwood' and "Edmonds"; both being municipal corporations of the State of Washington and located in Snohomish County, Washington. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on October 26, 1982, Edmonds and Lynnwood entered into an agreement to acccimplish the joint treatment and disposal of the sanitary sewage collected by the two cities, specifying the operation, maintenance, joint use and the payment thereof for those sewerage works facilities to be jointly used, and defining the rights, duties and obligations of the parties; and WHEREAS, the October 26, 1982, agreement permits the serving City supplying sewerage facilities to the purchasing City to provide additional sewerage facilities to the purchasing City if the increase is deemed feasible based upon review of the reserve capacities of the serving City; and WHEREAS, upon Edmonds' inquiry, Lynnwood requested that Edmonds reserve a maximum capacity for Lynnwood at the Edmonds treatment plant of two hundred (200) connections, an increase from the previously allocated one hundred nineteen (119) connections; and WHEREAS, Edmonds requested that its capacity at the Lynnwood treatment plant be increased from six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) to nine hundred twenty thousand (920,000) gallons per day (hereinafter "gd"); and WHEREAS, design capacity at the Lynnwood.. treatment plant was not increased by 300,000 gd for Edmonds; and WHEREAS., instead of increasing the capacity, a diversion of Lynnwood flows will be made to vacate enough capacity at .the Lynnwood treatment plant to accommodate up to three hundred thousand (300,000) additional gd for Edmonds; and WHEREAS, Edmonds treatment plant has the capacity to accommodate a diversion of up to three hundred thousand (300,000) gd from Lynnwood for the purpose of freeing up capacity for the difference between six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) and nine hundred twenty thousand (920,000) gd to compensate for additional flows from Edmonds at the Lynnwood treatment plant; and WHEREAS, Edmonds has the right to deliver six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) gd to the Lynnwood treatment plant; and WHEREAS, Edmonds will. not be required to participate in any further expansion of the Lynnwood treatment plant for capacity unless Edmonds' flows exceed nine hundred twenty thousand (920,000) gd; 949E1l1 Packet Page 739 of 895 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the said parties hereby agree as follows: Section 1. INCORPORATION OF PREVIOUS AGREEMENT. This agreement will serve as an amendment to the October 26, 1982 Agreement for Joint Use of Sanitary Sewerage Facilities Between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 2. DEFINITION OF TERMS. For the purposes of the Agreement, the following are defined terms: A. The term "diversion" shall mean the transmission of Lynnwood sewage flows to Edmonds beyond Lynnwood's allocated capacity at the Edmonds treatment plant for the purpose of vacating sufficient capacity in the Lynnwood treatment plant for Edmonds flows which exceed six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) gd. Section 3. DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE OF ADDITIONAL SEWAGE. Presently, each City is reserving a capacity of three hundred thousand (300,000) gd, based on average annual daily flows, in its wastewater treatment plant for the other city. Each party agrees that, at a time when Edmonds reaches the limit of its allocated capacity at the Lynnwood plant of six hundred twenty thousand (620,000) gd, Lynnwood shall make additional capacity available for Edmonds flows of up to three hundred thousand (300,000) additional gd, by diverting Lynnwood sewage to the Edmonds plant. The amount of sewage diverted from Lynnwood to Edmonds shall be approximately equal to the Edmonds flows to Lynnwood which are in excess of six hundred and twenty thousand (620,000) gd, but shall not exceed three hundred thousand (300,000) gd without -prior written consent and agreement. Lynnwood agrees to be responsible for monitoring the capacity of its plant, to inform Edmonds when diversion becomes necessary, and to make arrangements for said diversion. The Lynnwood capacity at the Edmonds treatment plant is two hundred (200) connections. Edmonds will make available to Lynnwood additional capacity at the Edmonds plant, up to three hundred thousand (300,000) gd for the purpose of the flow diversion needed to provide Edmonds with additional capacity at the Lynnwood plant up to a limit of nine hundred and twenty thousand (920,000) gd. Section 4. PAYMENT. The payment plan agreed to by each party in the October 26, 1982 agreement is still in effect, in all its facets, subject to the following: The capital costs of providing three hundred thousand (300,000) gd capacity at each plant shall not be charged to the other city. 9G9E1/2 Packet Page 740 of 895 Section S. EFFECTIVE DATE. The provisions of this amendment shall become effective on the date this agreement is signed and the charges provided for herein commence on the effective date, unless other provisions have been made. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties have executed this agreement as of this day of , 1990. CIT By: ATTEST: By: �cr ACQ ELINE G. PARRETT, City Clerk LJS/nmc CITY OF LYNNWOOD � / �)- 1 7 .�" 1 /1" M. J.4iRDLICKA, Mayor City Clerk r 949E1/3 Packet Page 741 of 895 G.7 Agreement between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood —August 15, 2011 Packet Page 742 of 895 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR DISPOSAL OF BIOSOLIDS BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND THE CITY OF LYNN OOD THIS AGREEMENT, is made this !S day of , 2011, by and between the City of Edmonds (hereinafter "Edmonds"), and the Ci y of Lynnwood (hereinafter "Lynnwood"); and WHEREAS, Edmonds has the facilities and expertise to treat and dispose of biosolid waste; and WHEREAS, Lynnwood is in need of such facilities and expertise; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: TERMS 1. Description of Pro ram. Edmonds agrees to handle the disposal and treatment of biosolids delivered by Lynnwood in accordance with the terms and conditions attached as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. The City of Edmonds, as operator of the plant, specifically reserves as set forth below the right to terminate this Agreement at any time and the City of Edmonds will terminate this Agreement, when, in its sole discretion, it determines that the disposal of solids hereunder would interfere with the smooth, efficient and cost effective operation of the secondary sewage treatment plant. 2. Payment. A. When charges are pending, Edmonds shall submit a monthly payment invoice to Lynnwood for services to date, and Lynnwood shall make payments within thirty (30) days after the submittal of the invoice. B. If Lynnwood objects to all or any portion of any invoice, it shall so notify Edmonds within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt and shall pay the portion of the invoice not in dispute. The parties shall immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. If they are unable to resolve their dispute, the parties agree to use an alternative dispute resolution procedure to resolve their differences. C. The prices to be paid are set forth in the attached Exhibit A which has been incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. The charge for disposal of biosolids set forth in such Exhibit may be amended by the provision of thirty (30) days prior written notice from Edmonds to Lynnwood. Upon receipt of such notice, Lynnwood may terminate this agreement or, by continuing to ship biosolids for disposal, agree to the amendment of this agreement to incorporate such new and higher charge. In such event, Exhibit A shall be deemed amended to incorporate such new charge. -1- Packet Page 743 of 895 3. Duration. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution and shall remain in effect for an initial term until December 31, 2011. Unless terminated as provided below, the Agreement may continue in effect at the mutual agreement of the parties for up to two additional two-year terms to expire December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2015. 4. Termination. Either party may terminate this contract at any time upon sixty (60) days written notice. Edmonds reserves the right to refuse or suspend any biosolid delivery from Lynnwood at any time and for any length of time in accordance with plant operational needs. Paragraphs 2 and 5 shall survive termination of this Agreement. 5. indemnification and Hold Harmless. It is understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and gives no right to any other party. No joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. Each party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its own negligent acts or omissions, and those of its officers, agents or employees, while performing work pursuant to this Agreement, to the fullest extent required by law, and agrees to save, indemnify, defend, and hold the other party harmless from any such liability. In the case of negligence of multiple parties, any damages allowed shall be assessed in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to each party, and each party shall have the right to seek contribution from the other party in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to the other party. 6. Miscellaneous Disclosures as Re uired by RCW 39.34.030. No separate legal entity shall be created by this Agreement, and each party hereto shall be responsible for its own budgeting of funds transferred under this Agreement. No property shall transfer ownership or be jointly owned as a result of this Agreement. Edmonds shall serve as the administrator of this Agreement. 7. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with all Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the parties, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of, or altering in any manner whatsoever, this Agreement. 8 Modification. No waiver, alteration or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by duly authorized representatives of Edmonds and Lynnwood. 9. Waiver. Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such, nor shall any waiver or relinquishment of such right or power at any time be taken to be a waiver of any other breach. 10. Governinq Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Any suit brought by either party arising out of this Agreement shall only be maintained in a court of competent jurisdiction -2- Packet Page 744 of 895 in Snohomish County, Washington. 11. Fil. Ing. This Agreement shall be filed with the Snohomish County Auditor as required by RCW 39.34.040. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year above written. CITY OF EDMONDS By: I'AJIL-, ( v� Mayor Mike Cooper ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: SANDRA S. CHASE, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: bffiec"d the City Attorney ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lynnwo d Attorney _3_ Packet Page 745 of 895 EXHIBIT A The City of Edmonds agrees to assist the City of Lynnwood with its biosolids disposal needs. Our approval is based upon the following conditions; • Shipments will be received at a time agreed to by both agencies at least 24 hours in advance. • The delivery route to the Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) will be from SR 104 west, right on Dayton Street, right on Second Avenue South. • Lynnwood will be charged $0.25 per dry pound. • Test results performed at Edmonds WWTP will be used for billing. The method for calculating the quantity received will be as follows: Lynnwood will split a sample taken during each tanker loading destined for the Edmonds WWTP. The biosolids hauler will deliver a sample to the Edmonds WWTP for solids concentration analysis. Quantity of liquid biosolids received will be measured using the flowmeter at the plant. Edmonds WWTP personnel will log all deliveries and pounds received each day. • Edmonds WWTP will be responsible for unloading deliveries. • If the solids concentration generated from Lynnwood changes significantly, Edmonds WWTP will be notified in advance. • The City of Edmonds reserves the right to refuse deliveries if plant storage tank capacity is threatened. IMI Packet Page 746 of 895 APPENDIX H Pre -Treatment Policy Packet Page 747 of 895 Chapter 7.90 WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT — GENERAL PROVISIONS Sections: 7.90.010 Purpose and policy. 7.90.020 Administration. 7.90.030 Definitions. 7.90.040 Abbreviations. 7.90.010 Purpose and policy. A. Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC set forth uniform requirements for users of the publicly owned treatment works (POTW) operated by the city of Edmonds, and enables the city to comply with all applicable state and federal laws, including the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1251 et seq.) and the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 CFR Part 403). The objectives of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC are: 1. To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the POTW that will interfere with the operation of the POTW; 2. To prevent the introduction of pollutants into the POTW which will pass through the POTW, inadequately treated, into receiving waters or otherwise be incompatible with the POTW; 3. To ensure that the quality of POTW sludge is maintained at a level which allows its use and disposal in compliance with applicable statutes and regulations; 4. To protect POTW personnel who may be affected by wastewater and sludge in the course of their employment and to protect the general public; 5. To improve the opportunity to recycle and reclaim wastewater and biosolids from the POTW; and 6. To promote strategies that reduce the amounts of pollution generated by users, thereby reducing the associated hazards to the POTW and receiving waters. B. Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC shall apply to all users of the POTW. Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC define certain prohibited discharges; set forth local limits for use by state agencies in the issuance of wastewater discharge permits; authorize monitoring, compliance, and enforcement activities; establish administrative review procedures; require user reporting; and provide for the recovery of liquidated damages and collection of penalties. [Ord. 3401 § 1, 2002]. 7.90.020 Administration. Except as otherwise provided herein, the director shall administer, implement, and enforce the provisions of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. Any powers granted to or duties imposed upon the director may be delegated by the director to other city of Edmonds personnel. [Ord. 3401 § 1, 2002]. Packet Page 748 of 895 7.90.030 Definitions. Unless a provision explicitly states otherwise, the following terms and phrases, as used in Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC, shall have the meanings hereinafter designated. 1. "Accessible," when applied to required pretreatment monitoring or treatment equipment, shall mean direct access without the necessity of removing any panel, door, vehicle, equipment, materials, or other similar obstruction. 2. "Act" or "the Act" means the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1251 et seq., as now exists or may hereafter be amended. 3. "Administrative penalty (fine)" means a punitive monetary charge unrelated to treatment cost, which is assessed by the director rather than by a court. 4. "AKART" is an acronym for "all known, available, and reasonable technology (prevention, control, and treatment) to prevent and control pollution of the waters of the state of Washington." AKART shall represent the most current methodology that can be reasonably required for preventing, controlling, or abating the pollutants associated with a discharge. AKART shall be applied by all users of the POTW. AKART includes best management practices and may be required by the director for any discharge to the POTW. 5. "Applicable pretreatment standards" means for any specified pollutant, the more stringent of the city's prohibitive standards, the city's specific pretreatment standards, the state of Washington's pretreatment standards, or applicable National Categorical Pretreatment Standards. 6. "Approval authority" means the state of Washington Department of Ecology. 7. Authorized Representative of the User. a. If the user is a corporation: i. The president, secretary, treasurer, or a vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision - making functions for the corporation; or ii. The manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operation facilities, if authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures; b. If the user is a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or proprietor, respectively; c. If the user is a federal, state or local governmental facility: a director or highest official appointed or designated to oversee the operation and performance of the activities of the government facility, or his/her authorized designee; Packet Page 749 of 895 d. The individuals described in subsections (a) through (c) of this definition may designate another authorized representative if the authorization is in writing, the authorization specifies the individual or position responsible for the overall operation of the facility from which the discharge originates or having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company, and the written authorization is submitted to the city. 8. "Average daily flow" shall be defined as the arithmetical mean of the total process wastewater flow over a one-year period. This mean shall be calculated based on days when a discharge occurs. 9. "Best management practices (BMPs)" means the schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the pollution of "waters of the United States." BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage. 10. "Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)" means the quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation of organic matter amenable to measurement by the methods described in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (current edition); under standard laboratory procedures for five days at 20 degrees centigrade, usually expressed as a concentration [milligrams per liter (mg/L)]. 11. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of wastestreams from any portion of a user's treatment facility. 12. "Categorical pretreatment standard" or "categorical standard" means any regulation containing pollutant discharge limits promulgated by the U.S. EPA in accordance with Sections 307(b) and (c) of the Act (33 USC 1317) which apply to a specific category of users and which appear in 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter N, Parts 405-471. 13. "Categorical user" means a user covered by one or more of the EPA's categorical pretreatment standards. 14. "City" means the city of Edmonds, Washington. 15. "Cooling water/noncontact cooling water" means water used for cooling purposes which does not come into direct contact with any raw material, intermediate product, waste product, or finished product. Cooling water may be generated from any use, such as air conditioning, heat exchangers, cooling or refrigeration to which the only pollutant added is heat. 16. "Color" means the optical density at the visual wavelength of maximum absorption, relative to distilled water. One hundred percent transmittance is equivalent to 0.0 optical density. 17. "Composite sample" means the sample resulting from the combination of individual wastewater samples taken at selected intervals based on an increment of either flow or time. Packet Page 750 of 895 18. "Day' shall be defined as a calendar day. 19. "Department' means the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) or authorized representatives thereof. (DOE is also the definition of the "approval authority.") 20. "Director" means the director of the city of Edmonds public works department, or his duly authorized representative or designee. 21. "Domestic sewage" means the liquid and waterborne wastes derived from ordinary living processes, free from industrial wastewaters, and of such character to permit satisfactory disposal, without special treatment, into the POTW. 22. "Domestic user (residential user)" means any person who contributes, causes, or allows the contribution of wastewater into the city POTW that is of a similar volume and/or chemical makeup as that from a residential dwelling unit. Discharges from a residential dwelling unit typically include up to 100 gallons per capita per day at 250 mg/L of BOD and TSS. 23. "Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)" means the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or, where appropriate, the Regional Water Management Division Director, or other duly authorized official of said agency. 24. Existing Source. For a categorical user, an "existing source" is any source of discharge, the construction or operation of which commenced prior to the publication by EPA of proposed categorical pretreatment standards, which will be applicable to such source if the standard is thereafter promulgated in accordance with Section 307 of the Act. 25. Existing User. For noncategorical users an "existing user" is defined as any user which is discharging wastewater prior to July 15, 2002. 26. "Fats, oils and grease (FOG)" means the term fats, oils, and grease shall mean those components of wastewater amenable to measurement by the methods described in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (current edition). The term "fats, oils and grease" shall include polar and nonpolar fats, oils, and grease and other components extracted from wastewater by these methods. 27. "Food service facility" means any facility which prepares and/or packages food for sale or consumption, on- or off -site, with the exception of private residences. Food service facilities shall include, but are not limited to: food manufacturers, food packagers, restaurants, grocery stores, bakeries, lounges, hospitals, hotels, nursing homes, churches, schools, and all other food service facilities not listed above. 28. "Grab sample" means a sample which is taken from a wastestream on a one-time basis without regard to the flow in the wastestream and without consideration of time. Packet Page 751 of 895 29. "Grease interceptor" means a device located underground and outside of a food service facility designed to collect, contain or remove food wastes and grease from the wastestream while allowing the balance of the liquid waste to discharge to the sewer system. 30. "Grease trap" means a device located in a food service facility or under a sink designed to collect, contain or remove food wastes and grease from the wastestream while allowing the balance of the liquid waste to discharge to the sewer system. 31. "High strength waste" means any waters or wastewater having a concentration of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) or total suspended solids (TSS) in excess of 250 mg/L. 32. "Indirect discharge" or "discharge" means the introduction of pollutants into the POTW from any nondomestic source regulated under Section 307(b), (c), or (d) of the Act. The discharge into the POTW is normally by means of pipes, conduits, pumping stations, force mains, constructed drainage ditches, surface water intercepting ditches, and all constructed devices and appliances appurtenant thereto. 33. "Industrial wastewater" means water or liquid -carried waste from any industry, manufacturing operation, trade, or business which includes any combination of process wastewater, cooling water, contaminated stormwater, contaminated leachates, or other waters such that the combined effluent differs in some way from purely domestic sewage, or is subject to regulation under federal categorical pretreatment standards, the state waste discharge permit program, or Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. 34. "Interceptor" means a device designed and installed so as to separate and retain deleterious or undesirable matter from normal wastes and permit normal liquid wastes to discharge to the sewer system. 35. "Interference" means a discharge which alone or in conjunction with a discharge or discharges from other sources, either: a. Inhibits or disrupts the POTW, its treatment processes or operations; b. Inhibits or disrupts its sludge processes, use or disposal; or c. Is a cause of a violation of the city's NPDES permit or of the prevention of sewage sludge use or disposal in compliance with any of the following statutory or regulatory provisions or permits issued thereunder: i. Section 405 of the Clean Water Act; ii. The Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA), including Title II commonly referred to as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); iii. The Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 503, Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge; Packet Page 752 of 895 iv. Any state regulations contained in any state sludge management plan prepared pursuant to Subtitle D of the SWDA; v. The Clean Air Act; vi. The Toxic Substances Control Act; vii. And the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act. 36. "Lateral" means that portion of the sewage conveyance system from the point it exits the user's facility to the point where it connects to the POTW main line. Also known as a "side sewer." 37. "Liquid waste" is the discharge from any appliance, appurtenance, or other fixture in connection with a plumbing system that does not receive fecal matter. 38. "Maximum allowable discharge limit" means the maximum concentration (or loading) of a pollutant allowed to be discharged at any time. 39. "May" means a permissive or discretionary directive. 40. "Medical wastes" means isolation wastes, infectious agents, human blood and blood products, pathological wastes, sharps, body parts, contaminated bedding, surgical wastes, potentially contaminated laboratory wastes, and dialysis wastes. 41. "New source" means: a. Any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is (or may be) a discharge of pollutants, the construction of which commenced after the publication of applicable categorical standards, provided, that: i. The building, structure, facility, or installation is constructed at a site at which no other source is located; or ii. The building, structure, facility, or installation totally replaces the process or production equipment that causes the discharge of pollutants at an existing source; or iii. The production or wastewater generating processes of the building, structure, facility, or installation are substantially independent of an existing source at the same site. In determining whether these are substantially independent, factors such as the extent to which the new facility is integrated with the existing plant, and the extent to which the new facility is engaged in the same general type of activity as the existing source should be considered. Packet Page 753 of 895 b. Construction on a site at which an existing source is located results in a modification rather than a new source, if the construction does not create a new building, structure, facility, or installation meeting the criteria of subsection (41)(a)(ii) or (iii) above but otherwise alters, replaces, or adds to existing process or production equipment. c. Construction of a new source as defined under this paragraph has commenced if the owner or operator has: i. Begun, or caused to begin as part of a continuous on -site construction program; A. Any placement, assembly, or installation of facilities or equipment; or B. Significant site preparation work including clearing, excavation, or removal of existing buildings, structures, or facilities which is necessary for the placement, assembly, or installation of new source facilities or equipment; or ii. Entered into a binding contractual obligation for the purchase of facilities or equipment that are intended to be used in its operation within a reasonable time. Options to purchase or contracts which can be terminated or modified without substantial loss, and contracts for feasibility, engineering, and design studies do not constitute a contractual obligation under this definition. 42. "New user" is not necessarily a "new source" and is defined as a user that applies to the city for a new building permit or any person who occupies an existing building and plans to discharge wastewater to the city's collection system after July 15, 2002. Any person that buys an existing facility that is discharging nondomestic wastewater will be considered an "existing user" if no significant changes are made in the operation. 43. "Ordinance, this," as used in Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC, shall mean the provisions of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. 44. "Pass through" means a condition occurring when discharges from users (singly or in combination) exit the POTW in quantities or concentrations which either: (1) cause a violation of any requirement of a city NPDES or state waste discharge permit; (2) cause an increase in the magnitude or duration of a violation; or (3) cause a violation of any water quality standard for waters of the state promulgated under state regulations including Chapter 173-201A WAC. 45. "Permittee" means a person or user issued a wastewater discharge permit or discharge authorization. 46. "Person" means any individual, partnership, co -partnership, firm, company, corporation, association, joint stock company, trust, estate, governmental entity, or any other legal entity, or their legal representatives, agents, or assigns. This definition includes all federal, state, or local governmental entities. Packet Page 754 of 895 47. "pH" means a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a substance, expressed in standard units. (Technically defined as the logarithm of the reciprocal of the mass of hydrogen ions in grams per liter of solution.) 48. "Pollutant' means any substance discharged into a POTW or its collection system which, if discharged directly, would alter the chemical, physical, biological or radiological properties of waters of the state of Washington, including pH, temperature, taste, color, turbidity, oxygen demand, toxicity or odor. This includes any discharge likely to create a nuisance or render such waters harmful, detrimental or injurious to any beneficial uses, terrestrial or aquatic life, or to public health, safety or welfare. 49. "Pretreatment' means the reduction of the amount of pollutants, the elimination of pollutants, or the alteration of the nature of pollutant properties in wastewater prior to (or in lieu of) introducing such pollutants into the POTW. This reduction or alteration can be obtained by physical, chemical, or biological processes; by process changes; or by other means (except by diluting the concentration of the pollutants, unless allowed by an applicable pretreatment standard). 50. "Pretreatment requirements" means any substantive or procedural local, state, or federal requirement related to pretreatment developed under Chapter 90.48 RCW and/or Sections 307 and 402 of the Clean Water Act. 51. "Pretreatment standards" or "standards" means any pollutant discharge limitations including categorical standards, state standards, and limits of ECC 7.91.040 applicable to the discharge of nondomestic wastes to the POTW. The term shall also include the prohibited discharge standards of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC, WAC 173-216-060, and 40 CFR Part 403.5. 52. "Process wastewater" means industrial wastewater minus cooling water/n on contact cooling water. 53. "Prohibited discharge standards" or "prohibited discharges" means absolute prohibitions against the discharge of certain substances; these prohibitions appear in ECC 7.91.010(A) and (B). 54. "Publicly owned treatment works (POTW)" means a "treatment works," as defined by Section 212 of the Act (33 USC 1292) which is owned by the city. This definition includes all devices, facilities, or systems used in the collection, storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of sewage or industrial wastewaters of a liquid nature and any conveyances that convey wastewater to a treatment plant. The term also means the city of Edmonds wastewater treatment plant. 55. "Sanitary flow" means sewage. 56. "Septic tank waste" means any domestic and/or residential sewage from holding tanks such as vessels, chemical toilets, campers, trailers, and septic tanks. Packet Page 755 of 895 57. "Sewage" means water -carried human wastes or a combination of water -carried wastes from residences, business buildings, institutions and industrial establishments, together with such gray water (household showers, dishwashing operations, food preparation, etc.) as may be present. 58. "Sewer" means any pipe, conduit, ditch, or other device used to collect and transport sewage from the generating source. 59. "Shall" means a mandatory directive. 60. Side Sewer. See "Lateral." 61. "Significant industrial user (SIU)" means: a. A user subject to categorical pretreatment standards; or b. A user that: i. Discharges an average daily flow of 25,000 GPD or more of process wastewater to the POTW (excluding sanitary, noncontact cooling, and boiler blowdown wastewater); or ii. Contributes a process wastestream which makes up five percent or more of the average dry weather hydraulic or organic capacity of the POTW treatment plant; or iii. Is designated as such by the department with input from the city on the basis that it, alone or in conjunction with other sources has a reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any pretreatment standard or requirement. c. Upon a finding that a user meeting the criteria in subsection (b) of this definition has no reasonable potential for adversely affecting the POTW's operation or for violating any applicable pretreatment standard or requirement, the department may at any time, on its own initiative or in response to a petition received from a user or the city [and in accordance with procedures in 40 CFR 403.8(f)(6)] determine that such user should not be considered a significant industrial user. 62. "Significant noncompliance (SNC)" shall refer to a violation or pattern of violation of one of the following natures: a. Chronic violations of wastewater discharge limits, defined here as those in which 66 percent or more of all wastewater measurements taken during a six-month period exceed the daily maximum limit or average limit for the same pollutant parameter by any amount; b. Technical review criteria (TRC) violations, defined here as those in which 33 percent or more of all wastewater measurements taken for each pollutant parameter during a six-month period equal or exceed the product of the daily maximum limit or the average limit multiplied by the Packet Page 756 of 895 applicable TRC [1.4 for BOD, TSS, fats, oils and grease, and 1.2 for all other pollutants except pH]; c. Any other discharge violation that the city believes has caused, alone or in combination with other discharges, interference or pass through (including endangering the health of city personnel or the general public); d. Any discharge of pollutant that has caused imminent endangerment to human health, welfare or to the environment, or has resulted in the city's exercise of its emergency authority to halt or prevent such a discharge; e. Failure to meet, within 90 days after the scheduled date, a compliance schedule milestone contained in a wastewater discharge permit or enforcement order for starting construction, completing construction, or attaining final compliance; f. Failure to provide within 30 days after the due date, any required reports, including baseline monitoring reports, periodic self -monitoring reports, and reports on compliance with compliance schedules; g. Failure to accurately report noncompliance; or h. Any other violation(s) that the director determines will adversely affect the operation or implementation of the local pretreatment program. 63. "Slug load" means any discharge at a flow rate or concentration which could cause a violation of the discharge standards in ECC 7.91.010 through 7.91.040 or any discharge of a nonroutine, episodic nature, including but not limited to, an accidental spill or a noncustomary batch discharge, or any discharge greater than or equal to five times the amount or concentration allowed by permit or Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. 64. "Standard industrial classification (SIC) code" means a classification pursuant to the Standard Industrial Classification Manual issued by the United States Office of Management and Budget, as now exists or as may hereafter be amended. 65. "State" means the state of Washington. 66. "Stormwater" means any flow occurring during or following any form of natural precipitation, and resulting from such precipitation, including snowmelt. 67. "Total suspended solids" means the total suspended matter that floats on the surface of, or is suspended in, water, wastewater, or other liquid, and which is removable by laboratory filtering and is amenable to measurement by the methods described in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (current edition). Packet Page 757 of 895 68. "Toxic pollutant" means one of the pollutants, or combination of those pollutants, listed as toxic in regulations promulgated by EPA under Section 307 (33 USC 1317) of the Act, or other pollutants as may be promulgated. 69. "Treatment plant effluent" means the discharge from the city's POTW. 70. "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with applicable pretreatment standards because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the user. 71. "User" or "industrial user" means a source of indirect discharge. The source shall not include "domestic user" as defined herein. 72. "Wastewater" means liquid and water -carried industrial wastewaters and sewage from residential dwellings, commercial buildings, industrial and manufacturing facilities, and institutions, whether treated or untreated, which are contributed to the POTW. 73. "Wastewater discharge permit (industrial wastewater discharge permit, discharge permit, discharge authorization)" means an authorization or equivalent control document issued by the department to users discharging wastewater to the POTW. The permit may contain appropriate pretreatment standards and requirements as set forth in Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. 74. "Wastewater treatment plant" or "treatment plant" or "pollution control facility" means that portion of the POTW that is designed to provide treatment of municipal sewage and industrial wastewater. 75. "Zero discharge permit" means a permit for a categorical user that operates its processes so that no industrial wastewater is discharged to the POTW. [Ord. 3487 § 1, 2004; Ord. 3401 § 1, 2002]. 7.90.040 Abbreviations. The following abbreviations shall have the designated meanings: AKART All known available and reasonable technology ASPP Accidental spill prevention plan BMPs Best management practices BOD Biochemical oxygen demand CFR Code of Federal Regulations COD Chemical oxygen demand EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency FOG Fats, oils, and grease gpd Gallons per day I Liter Packet Page 758 of 895 LEL Lower explosive limit mg Milligrams mg/L Milligrams per liter MSDS Material safety and data sheet NOV Notice of violation NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System O&M Operation and maintenance OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration POTW Publicly owned treatment works RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 USC 6901 et seq. RCW Revised Code of Washington SIC Standard Industrial Classifications SIU Significant industrial user SNC Significant noncompliance SWDA Solid Waste Disposal Act, Chapter 70.95 RCW TSS Total suspended solids UPC Uniform Plumbing Code USC United States Code WAC Washington Administrative Code With regards to abbreviations contained in this chapter, the use of the singular shall be construed to include the plural and the plural shall include the singular as indicated by the context of its use. [Ord. 3487 § 2, 2004; Ord. 3401 § 1, 2002]. Packet Page 759 of 895 Chapter 7.91 WASTEWATER PRETREATMENT — GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Sections: 7.91.010 Prohibited discharge standards. 7.91.020 Federal categorical pretreatment standards. 7.91.030 State requirements. 7.91.040 Local limits. 7.91.050 City's right of revision. 7.91.060 Special agreement. 7.91.070 Dilution. 7.91.080 Pretreatment facilities. 7.91.090 Deadline for compliance with applicable pretreatment requirements. 7.91.100 Additional pretreatment measures. 7.91.110 Accidental discharge/slug control plans. 7.91.120 Septic tank wastes. 7.91.010 Prohibited discharge standards. A. General Prohibitions. No user or domestic user shall introduce or cause to be introduced into the POTW any pollutant or wastewater that causes pass through or interference. These general prohibitions apply to all users of the POTW whether or not they are subject to categorical pretreatment standards or any other national, state, or local pretreatment standards or requirements. B. Specific Prohibitions. No user or domestic user shall introduce or cause to be introduced into the POTW the following pollutants, substances, or wastewater: 1. Pollutants which may create a fire or explosive hazard in the POTW, including, but not limited to, wastestreams with a closed -cup flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit (60 degrees Celsius) using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 261.21; 2. Wastewater having a pH less than 5.0 or more than 11.0, or otherwise causing corrosive structural damage to the POTW or equipment; 3. Solid or viscous substances in amounts which will cause obstruction of the flow in the POTW resulting in interference but in no case solids greater than one -quarter inch; 4. Pollutants, including oxygen -demanding pollutants (BOD, etc.), released in a discharge at a flow rate and/or pollutant concentration which, either singly or by interaction with other pollutants, will cause interference with the POTW; 5. Wastewater having a temperature which will inhibit biological activity in the treatment plant resulting in interference, but in no case wastewater which causes the temperature at the introduction into the treatment plant to exceed 104 degrees Fahrenheit (40 degrees Celsius); Packet Page 760 of 895 6. Petroleum oil, nonbiodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin, in amounts that will cause interference or pass through; 7. Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes within the POTW in a quantity that may cause acute worker health and safety problems; 8. Trucked or hauled pollutants (including sanitary wastes and grease wastes) unless authorized by the director in writing; 9. Noxious or malodorous liquids, gases, solids, or other wastewater which, either singly or by interaction with other wastes, are sufficient to create a public nuisance or a hazard to life, or to prevent entry into the sewers for maintenance or repair; 10. Wastewater which imparts color which cannot be removed by the treatment process, such as, but not limited to, dye wastes and vegetable tanning solutions, which consequently imparts color to the treatment plant's effluent, thereby violating the city's NPDES permit. Color (in combination with turbidity) shall not cause the treatment plant effluent to reduce the depth of the compensation point for photosynthetic activity by more than 10 percent from the seasonably established norm for aquatic life; 11. Wastewater containing any radioactive wastes or isotopes except as specifically approved in writing by the director in compliance with applicable state or federal regulations; 12. Stormwater, surface water, ground water, artesian well water, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, swimming pool drainage, condensate, deionized water, noncontact cooling water, and unpolluted wastewater, unless specifically authorized in writing by the director; 13. Any sludges, screenings, or other residues from the pretreatment of industrial or commercial wastes or from industrial or commercial processes, except as authorized in writing by the director; 14. Medical wastes, except as specifically authorized in writing by the director; 15. Wastewater causing, alone or in conjunction with other sources, the treatment plant's effluent to exhibit toxicity in an analytical test; 16. Detergents, surface-active agents, or other substances in amounts which may cause excessive foaming in the POTW; 17. Any liquid, solids, or gases which by reason of their nature or quantity are, or may be, sufficient either alone or by interaction with other substances to cause fire or explosion or be injurious in any other way to the POTW or to the operation of the POTW. At no time shall two successive readings on an explosion meter, at the point of discharge into the system (or at any Packet Page 761 of 895 point in the system), be more than five percent nor any single reading over 10 percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL) of the meter; 18. Animal guts or tissues, paunch manure, bones, hair, hides or fleshings, entrails, whole blood, feathers, ashes, cinders, sand, spent lime, stone or marble dusts, metal, glass, straw, shavings, grass clippings, rags, spent grains, spent hops, waste paper, wood, plastics, gas, tar asphalt residues, residues from refining or processing of fuel or lubricating oil, mud, or glass grinding or polishing wastes; 19. Any substance that will cause the POTW to violate its NPDES and/or other disposal system permits; 20. Any wastewater, which in the opinion of the director can cause harm either to the sewers, sewage treatment process, or equipment; have an adverse effect on the receiving stream; or can otherwise endanger life, limb, public property, or constitute a nuisance, unless authorized in a wastewater discharge permit; 21. The contents of any tank or other vessel commercially owned or used by any person in the business of collecting or pumping sewage, effluent, septage, or other wastewater, unless said person has first obtained testing and approval as may be generally required by the city of Edmonds and paid all fees assessed for the privilege of said discharge; 22. Any hazardous or dangerous wastes as defined in rules published by the state of Washington (Chapter 173-303 WAC) and/or in EPA rules 40 CFR Part 261; 23. Persistent pesticides and/or pesticides regulated by the Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act (FIFRA); 24. Any slug load; 25. Any substance that may cause the POTW's effluent or treatment residues, sludges, or scums to be unsuitable for reclamation and reuse, or to interfere with the reclamation process; 26. Fats, oils and grease in amounts that may cause obstructions or maintenance problems in the collection/conveyance system, or interference in the POTW. C. Pollutants, substances, or wastewater prohibited by this chapter shall not be processed or stored in such a manner that they are likely to be discharged to the POTW unless the user has in place an approved accidental spill prevention plan (ASPP)/slug control plan. [Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.020 Federal categorical pretreatment standards. National categorical pretreatment standards as adopted and hereafter amended by the EPA pursuant to the Act shall be met by all users in the regulated industrial categories. These standards, found in 40 CFR Packet Page 762 of 895 Chapter I, Subchapter N, Parts 405-471, as the same now exists or is hereinafter amended, are hereby incorporated by reference. [Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.030 State requirements. A. State requirements and limitations on discharges to the POTW shall be met by all users which are subject to such standards in any instance in which they are more stringent than federal requirements and limitations, or those in Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC or other applicable ordinances. This includes the requirement to meet MART as defined herein whenever applicable and more stringent than the limits of ECC 7.91.040, and to comply with the requirements of Chapter 7.92 ECC. B. Any user determined by the city to qualify as a significant industrial user shall file an application for a state waste discharge permit with the department in accordance with the requirements of WAC 173-216- 070. Proof of acceptance of the application, and payment of permit fees shall be kept at the user's facilities, and produced upon request by the city. Failure to submit the application or rejection of the application by the department may be considered sufficient grounds to terminate or refuse to provide sewer service. [Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.040 Local limits. A. The following pollutant limits are established to protect against pass through and interference. No person shall discharge wastewater containing in excess of the following daily maximum allowable discharge limits: arsenic 0.36 mg/L cadmium 0.27 mg/L chromium 1.99 mg/L copper 2.98 mg/L cyanide 0.29 mg/L lead 1.09 mg/L mercury 0.07 mg/L nickel 2.14 mg/L silver 1.44 mg/L zinc 5.13 mg/L nonpolar fats, oils, and grease 100 mg/L (NPFOG) B. The above limits apply at the point where the wastewater is discharged to the POTW (i.e., end of the user's pipe). Categorical pretreatment standards apply at the end of the process. However, the director may elect to have local limits apply after pretreatment and/or prior to mixing with dilution flows. Packet Page 763 of 895 C. All concentrations for metallic substances are for "total" metal unless indicated otherwise. The department may impose mass limitations in addition to (or in place of) the concentration -based limitations above. D. Where a user is subject to a categorical pretreatment standard and a local limit for a given pollutant, the more stringent limit or applicable pretreatment standard shall apply. [Ord. 3487 § 3, 2004; Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.050 City's right of revision. The city reserves the right to establish more stringent standards or requirements on discharges to the POTW. [Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.060 Special agreement. A. The city reserves the right to enter into written agreements with users to accept pollutants compatible with the treatment system at concentrations greater than those typical of domestic wastewater. Within such agreements, the city may establish terms of the user's discharge to the POTW including maximum flow rates and concentrations. The city may also establish fees to recover costs associated with treating such wastes and monitoring schedules in such agreements, as provided by ECC 7.102.010. In no case will a special agreement waive compliance with a state or federal pretreatment standard or requirement including federal categorical pretreatment standards. B. Users discharging or intending to discharge pollutants other than BOD and TSS, and claiming compatibility, must prove to the satisfaction of the director that such pollutants are compatible with the POTW. The director may require any claim of compatibility to be endorsed by the department. [Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.070 Dilution. A user shall not increase the use of process water, or in any way attempt to dilute a discharge, as a partial or complete substitute for adequate treatment to achieve compliance with an applicable pretreatment standard or requirement unless expressly authorized by an applicable pretreatment standard or requirement. The director may request the department to impose mass limitations on users, which he believes may be using dilution to meet applicable pretreatment standards or requirements, or in other cases when the imposition of mass limitations is appropriate. [Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.080 Pretreatment facilities. A. General Pretreatment Requirements. 1. Users shall procure and properly install, operate, and maintain the wastewater facilities which combined with appropriate practices are necessary to achieve AKART as defined herein. Such pretreatment facilities shall be designed to achieve compliance with all applicable pretreatment standards and requirements set out in Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC within the time limitations specified by the EPA, the state, or the director, whichever is more stringent. Packet Page 764 of 895 2. Detailed plans showing the pretreatment facilities and operating procedures shall be submitted to the department for review and approval in accordance with the procedures of Chapter 173-240 WAC, and shall be submitted to the city before construction of the facility. The review of such plans and operating procedures will in no way relieve the user from the responsibility of modifying the facility as necessary to produce an acceptable discharge to the city and/or the department and meet discharge limitations under the provisions of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. Any facilities required to pretreat wastewater to a level acceptable to the city shall be provided, operated, and maintained at the user's expense. 3. Users shall comply with approved engineering reports, plans and specifications, and operations and maintenance manuals, and shall modify such documents to reflect any proposed modifications of industrial wastewater (pretreatment) facilities. Users shall submit proposals to modify pretreatment facilities to the department before implementation in accordance with Chapter 173-240 WAC. Users shall submit a copy of such revised plans and the department's acceptance to the director before implementing changes to approved pretreatment facilities. The director may audit the compliance of any user, and require changes in operating procedures deemed necessary by the director to ensure continued compliance with applicable pretreatment standards and requirements. 4. New sources, and new users determined to be SIUs, must have pretreatment facilities installed and operating prior to discharge, if required. 5. Users who operate restaurants, cafes, lunch counters, delis, cafeterias, bars, or clubs; or hotel, hospital, sanitarium, factory or school kitchens; butcher shops; grocery stores or other establishments where food (polar) grease may be introduced to the sewer system shall have pretreatment facilities to prevent the discharge of fat, oil, and grease. Such pretreatment facilities shall be either a grease interceptor or grease trap as determined by the director, and installed in the wastewater line leading from sinks, drains, or other fixtures where grease may be discharged. 6. Users who operate automobile or truck repair facilities, steam cleaning facilities for motorized equipment, air compressor(s), or any other establishments or equipment where petroleum based (nonpolar) grease and oil may be introduced to the sewer system shall have pretreatment facilities to prevent the discharge of oil and grease. These pretreatment facilities shall be oil/water separators or interceptors located to collect such mixture of grease, oil, and water. Such facilities shall be in accordance with city and state standards. 7. Oil or grease of petroleum or mineral origin (nonpolar) shall not be discharged to the city's sewer system at a concentration in excess of 100 mg/L. 8. A plumbing permit is required for the installation of a grease trap. Fee schedule on file with city clerk's office. Packet Page 765 of 895 9. A side sewer permit is required for the installation of a grease interceptor. Fee schedule on file with the city clerk's office. B. Pretreatment Requirements for FOG. 1. The wholesale shredding and subsequent discharge of food wastes into the POTW is prohibited. Dry scraping dishes and cooking ware and the installation of flat screens and/or baskets in the prerinse, preparation and pot sinks is encouraged to reduce the solid waste load and the discharge of fats and oils. A food or garbage disposal unit, if used, must be connected to a grease interceptor, which may require more frequent cleaning due to the increased solid waste load. A food or garbage disposal unit shall not be used in a facility that is served by a grease trap. For purposes of this section, a food or garbage disposal unit is any device designed to chop, cut, or grind food and other waste material and discharge such waste to the wastewater drainage system. 2. Users that recycle fats, oils and grease must do so in a way that complies with all applicable state, city, and health department regulations. 3. The director will determine the type of grease removal equipment required according to the following criteria: a. For new facilities: After February 16, 2004, food service facilities which are newly proposed or constructed, or existing facilities which will be expanded or renovated to include a food service facility where such facility did not previously exist, shall be required to install, operate and maintain a grease interceptor. The director may, in his or her sole discretion, allow new facilities to install a grease trap instead of a grease interceptor according to the following criteria: i. A grease trap may be utilized instead of a grease interceptor if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the director that the installation of a grease interceptor is physically impracticable. For purposes of this determination, "physically impracticable" shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, the following conditions: (A) the lack of available space on the premises; (B) unavoidable interference from underground utilities or structures; and (C) topographical conditions such as slope that unavoidably prevent installation of a grease interceptor. ii. A grease trap may be utilized instead of a grease interceptor if both of the following conditions are present: (A) the city's interceptor sizing formula results in a required capacity of 500 gallons or less for the facility; and (B) the facility has a seating capacity of 60 or less; provided, that if either condition subsequently ceases to exist, the director may require said facility to install a grease interceptor. Packet Page 766 of 895 Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the director to allow a grease trap in lieu of a grease interceptor. b. For existing facilities: Subject to the provisions of this subsection, food service facilities operating prior to February 16, 2004, shall be permitted to install, operate, and maintain grease traps that are properly sized and installed according to the city's guidelines in lieu of grease interceptors. However, the director may, in his or her sole discretion, require an existing facility to install a grease interceptor if the facility meets one or both of the following conditions: (A) continues to deposit FOG in the wastewater collection system; or (B) repeatedly violates BMPs or maintenance standards. i. Continued FOG deposition: The facility shall be notified in writing by the director if it must upgrade to a properly sized and installed grease trap. Immediately following the allowable period for installation and upgrade, the director may begin evaluation of performance and FOG removal effectiveness by inspection of the affected sewer main line and lateral or by other appropriate means. If the facility is found to still be contributing FOG in quantities and at a projected deposition rate sufficient to necessitate cleaning the affected portion of the city's wastewater collection system more frequently than once every five years, or if the lateral continues to require cleaning one or more times per year to prevent grease blockages, then the director may require installation of a grease interceptor. ii. Violation of maintenance standards or BMPs: If the facility demonstrates an unwillingness or incapacity to apply appropriate BMPs or to conduct proper grease trap maintenance by receiving four or more written notices of violation within a 12- month period, or six or more within a 24-month period, then the director may require installation of a grease interceptor in addition to or in lieu of any other fees, penalties, or other enforcement action. iii. The director shall give written notification to a facility that is required to install a grease interceptor and shall require such installation to be completed within 12 months of receipt of written notification. iv. Approval by the director of proposed grease removal equipment does not in any way guarantee that this equipment will function in the manner described by its constructor or manufacturer; nor shall it relieve a person or facility of the responsibility of replacing, enlarging, or otherwise modifying such equipment to accomplish the intended purpose. Approval by the director to install and operate a grease trap shall not be construed to mean that a grease interceptor may not subsequently be required according to the aforementioned criteria. Packet Page 767 of 895 c. Exempt facilities: The director, in his or her sole discretion, may grant exemption from the requirement for grease removal equipment to facilities that have little or no potential to contribute oil and grease to the wastewater collection system because they do not cook or prepare food. The director may revoke a facility's exemption if that facility's operation changes to include cooking or food preparation or if it becomes apparent that FOG is being discharged and accumulating in the facility's lateral or the POTW main line. 4. The use of any additive, such as enzymes, chemicals, or bacteria, as a substitute for grease traps or interceptors or the maintenance of grease traps or interceptors is prohibited. In no case shall any additive that emulsifies fats, oils or grease be used. Any use of additives as a supplement to grease interceptors shall first be authorized in writing by the director prior to their use by the facility owner or the grease hauler. MSDS sheets and any other applicable information concerning the composition, frequency of use and mode of action of the proposed additive shall be sent to the city together with a written statement outlining the proposed use of the additive(s). Based upon the information received and any other information solicited from the potential user or supplier, the city shall allow or deny the use of the additive in writing. Permission to use any specific additive may be withdrawn by the city at any time if violations of this chapter occur that can be demonstrated to be due to the use of the additive. 5. Alternative grease/oil removal systems may be approved in writing by the director on a case - by -case basis to augment or replace grease interceptors to achieve acceptable discharge. Testing of alternative devices to demonstrate acceptable removal of FOG shall be at the expense of the user. 6. Authorized city employees shall be allowed ready access at all reasonable times to all parts of the user's premises for the purpose of inspection, observation, records examination, measurement, sampling and testing in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. The refusal of any user to allow the director entry to or upon the user's premises for purposes of inspection, sampling effluents or inspecting and copying records or performing such other duties as shall be required by Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC shall constitute a violation of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. The director may seek a warrant or use such other legal procedures as may be advisable and reasonably necessary to discharge his duties under Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. 7. Inspections. City employees may inspect the user's premises on both an unscheduled and unannounced basis or on a scheduled basis to ascertain whether the intent of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC is being met and all requirements are being complied with. The official may also determine if the facility has implemented best management practices as fully as possible. Inspections may include all equipment, food processing and storage areas and shall pay special attention to the processes that produce wastewater which is discharged from the facility through the grease interceptor/trap. The official may also inspect the interceptor/trap maintenance record, other pertinent data, the grease interceptor/trap and may check the level of the Packet Page 768 of 895 interceptor/trap contents and/or take samples as necessary. Noted deficiencies may include but not be limited to: a. Failure to properly maintain the grease interceptor or trap in accordance with the provision of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. b. Failure to record pumping activities or keep copies of manifest forms or receipts. c. Failure to maintain logs, files, records or access for inspection or monitoring activities. 8. Reinspections. The city official shall reinspect users' facilities that received deficiency notices at a previous inspection. The city official shall inspect the repairs or other deficiencies and shall provide written notice of compliance or noncompliance as the case may be. In the event of continuing noncompliance, successive reinspections will be scheduled and appropriate fees shall be charged to the user concerned. A first reinspection shall be performed after a minimum of 30 working days has elapsed to allow for corrective action by the user to be completed. 9. Monitoring. The city shall have the right to inspect a facility's lateral or to sample and analyze the wastewater from any facility at any time to determine compliance with the requirements of the city code and to evaluate the performance and effectiveness of equipment and procedures to remove FOG from the waste stream. Evidence of the deposition of FOG in the facility's lateral or the city's sewer line may cause enforcement action to be initiated, and the city's monitoring costs may be billed to the user. 10. If a failure to maintain grease traps or interceptors, results in partial or complete blockage of the building sewer, private sewer system discharging to the city sewer system, or other parts of the city sewer system, or adversely affects the treatment or transmission capabilities of the POTW, or requires excessive maintenance by the city, or poses a possible health hazard, the discharger responsible for the facilities shall be subject to the remedies herein, including cost recovery, enforcement and penalties. C. Grease Traps. All grease trap installations must meet the following criteria: 1. Trap Design and Location. Grease traps shall conform to the standards in the current edition of the UPC. Grease traps shall be installed in strict accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Grease traps shall be equipped with a cover and a mechanism for a secure closing. Flow control devices shall be required where the water flow through the grease trap may exceed its rated flow. Dishwashers and food or garbage disposal units shall not be connected to grease traps. No more than four fixtures shall connect to an individual grease trap. Grease traps shall be located in the facility's sewer line between all fixtures which may introduce grease into the sewer system and the connection to the city's wastewater collection system. Wastewater from sanitary Packet Page 769 of 895 facilities and other similar fixtures shall not be introduced into the grease trap under any circumstances. 2. Trap Capacity. The required flow capacity of the grease trap in gallons per minute shall be determined according to sizing guidelines adopted by the director. The director may require installation of a grease trap having a greater capacity than that indicated by said guidelines if deemed necessary to protect the city's sewer system. 3. Flow Control Device. Grease traps shall be equipped with a device to control the rate of flow through the unit. The rate of flow shall not exceed the manufacturer's rated capacity recommended in gallons per minute for the unit. 4. Inspection, Cleaning and Maintenance. Each facility shall be solely responsible for the cost of trap installation, inspection, cleaning and maintenance. Each facility may contract with a grease hauler, or it may develop a written protocol and perform its own grease trap cleaning and maintenance procedures. Cleaning and maintenance must be performed when the total volume of captured grease and solid material displaces more than 25 percent of the total volume of the unit. Each facility shall determine the frequency at which their grease trap shall be cleaned, but all grease traps shall be opened, inspected, cleaned and maintained at a minimum of once per week. However, the director, in his or her sole discretion, may authorize in writing a different schedule based upon the rate at which 25 percent of the unit's volume is displaced by retained grease and solids as determined by inspections. 5. Inspection. Grease traps may be inspected by the city as necessary to assure compliance with Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC and to assure proper cleaning and maintenance schedules are being adhered to. 6. Repairs. The facility shall be responsible for the cost and scheduling of all repairs to its grease trap(s). Repairs required by the city shall be completed within 14 working days after the date of written notice of required repairs is received by the facility. Users may utilize a different schedule for repair upon prior written approval from the city. 7. Disposal. Grease and solid materials removed from a grease trap shall be disposed of in the solid waste disposal system. 8. Record Keeping. The facility shall maintain records of the date and time of all cleaning and maintenance of each grease trap, and shall make this record available for inspection by the city on demand. D. Grease Interceptors. All grease interceptor installations must meet the following criteria: 1. Interceptor Design and Location. Grease interceptors shall conform to the standards in the current edition of the UPC. Grease interceptors shall have a minimum of two compartments and Packet Page 770 of 895 shall be capable of separation and retention of grease and storage of settled solids. Extended inlet and outlet sanitary tees must be; provided, that extend down to within 12 inches from the bottom of the tank. The owner/operator must provide, at his or her sole expense, an access manhole over each compartment for monitoring purposes. The inlet and outlet tees must be a minimum of six inches in diameter, and the influent and effluent flow must be visible and easily accessible from the access manhole for sampling. Covers shall have a gastight fit. The grease interceptor shall be designed, constructed and installed for adequate load -bearing capacity. Grease interceptors shall be located in the facility's lateral sewer line between all fixtures which may introduce grease into the sewer system and the connection to the city's wastewater collection system. Such fixtures shall include but not be limited to: sinks, dishwashers, automatic hood wash units, floor drains in food preparation and storage areas, and any other fixture which is determined to be a potential source of grease. Wastewater from sanitary facilities and other similar fixtures shall not be introduced into the grease interceptor under any circumstances. Interceptors shall be installed in a location outside of the building which provides easy access at all times for inspections, cleaning and proper maintenance, including pumping. The director is authorized to adopt additional criteria and specifications for grease interceptors. 2. Interceptor Capacity. Grease interceptor capacity calculations shall be performed by each facility based on size and type of operation according to the formulas contained in the sizing guidelines adopted by the director. The minimum capacity of any one unit shall be 500 gallons and the maximum capacity of any one unit shall be 4,000 gallons. 3. Inspection, Pumping and Maintenance. Each facility shall be responsible for the costs of installing, inspecting, cleaning and maintaining its grease interceptor. All facilities that have grease interceptors shall utilize a grease hauler. Pumping services shall include the complete removal of all contents, including floating materials, wastewater, and bottom sludges and solids. Decanting or discharging of removed wastes back into the grease interceptor from which the wastes were removed, or into any other grease interceptor, for the purpose of reducing the volume to be disposed of is strictly prohibited. Grease interceptor cleaning shall include removal of excessive solids from the walls, floors, baffles and all pipework. Each facility shall ensure that all fittings and fixtures inside the interceptor are in good condition and functioning properly after the pumping procedure, and that the unit is filled with enough clean, cool tap water to prevent any FOG from passing through the unit as it fills. 4. Interceptor Pumping Frequency. Each facility shall clean its grease interceptor at a minimum frequency of once every 90 days. Each facility shall determine the frequency at which its grease interceptor shall be pumped according to the following criteria: a. When the floatable grease layer exceeds 12 inches in depth as measured in the inlet compartment; or Packet Page 771 of 895 b. When the total volume of captured grease and solid material displaces more than 25 percent of the capacity of the interceptor as measured in the inlet compartment; or c. When the interceptor is not retaining/capturing oils and greases; or the removal efficiency of the device, as determined through sampling and analysis, is less than 80 percent. 5. Cleaning Variance. If a facility believes that quarterly pumping of their grease interceptor is unnecessary in order to remain in compliance with the criteria of subsection (D)(4) of this section, the facility may make written application to the director for a written variance from the quarterly pumping requirements. City employees will review cleaning maintenance records and perform physical inspections of the interceptor as needed to verify compliance with subsection (D)(4) of this section. The city will base the new cleaning frequency schedule upon observed accumulation for the user requesting the variance. 6. Inspection. Grease interceptors may be inspected by the city as necessary to assure compliance with Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC and to assure proper cleaning and maintenance schedules are being adhered to. 7. Repairs. The facility shall be responsible for the cost and scheduling of all repairs to its grease interceptor(s). Repairs required by the city shall be completed within 14 working days after the date of written notice of required repairs is received by the facility or other schedule upon written approval from the city. 8. Disposal. Wastes removed from each grease interceptor shall be disposed of at a facility that is permitted to receive such wastes. Grease or gray water shall not be returned to any grease interceptor, private sewer line or to any portion of the city's wastewater collection system. 9. Record Keeping. Each facility shall maintain records of the date and time of all cleaning and maintenance of each grease interceptor, and shall make this record available for inspection by the city on demand. E. Other Interceptors. 1. Dischargers who operate automatic and coin -operated laundries, car washes, filling stations, commercial garages or similar businesses having any type of washing facilities (including pressure washing and steam cleaning) or any other dischargers producing grit, sand, oils, lint, or other materials which have the potential of causing partial or complete obstruction of the building side sewer or other areas in the POTW shall, upon order of the director, install approved interceptors, oil/water separators, or tanks in accordance with specifications adopted by the city of Edmonds such that excessive amounts of oil, sand and inert solids are effectively prevented from entering the POTW. Packet Page 772 of 895 2. Installation and Maintenance. All grease interceptors, oil/water separators, settling tanks and grit traps shall be properly installed, maintained and operated by the discharger at his own expense. The installation shall be kept in continuous operation at all times, and shall be maintained in a manner that shall prevent oil or grease, and inert solids from being carried into the sewer system at all times. A service contractor qualified to perform such cleaning must perform cleaning. All material removed shall be disposed of in accordance with all state and federal regulations. Records and certification of maintenance shall be made readily available to the director for review and inspection, and must be maintained for a minimum of three years. 3. If a failure to maintain settling tanks, grit traps, grease interceptors, or oil/water separators results in partial or complete blockage of the building sewer, private sewer system discharging to the city sewer system, or other parts of the city sewer system, or adversely affects the treatment or transmission capabilities of the POTW, or requires excessive maintenance by the city, or poses a possible health hazard, the discharger responsible for the facilities shall be subject to the remedies herein, including cost recovery, enforcement and penalties. [Ord. 3487 § 4, 2004; Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.090 Deadline for compliance with applicable pretreatment requirements. A. Pretreatment Facilities for FOG. All restaurants, cafes, lunch counters, delis, cafeterias, bars, or clubs; or hotel, hospital, sanitarium, factory or school kitchens; butcher shops; or other establishments where food (polar) grease may be introduced to the sewer system which do not have grease traps or interceptors, or do not have adequately sized or correctly installed traps or interceptors shall meet the requirement for removal of fats, oils, and grease by installing or properly connecting an approved grease trap or interceptor, as determined by the director. Facilities that are required to install approved grease interceptors shall do so within 12 months after receiving written notification from the director. Facilities that are allowed to install approved grease traps or to upgrade existing trap installations, as provided elsewhere in this chapter, shall do so within 90 days after receiving written notification from the director. Facilities which are newly proposed or constructed after February 16, 2004, shall meet the requirements in this chapter for installation of grease removal equipment prior to commencement of discharge. B. Significant Industrial Users. Compliance by existing sources (categorical users) covered by categorical pretreatment standards shall be within three years of the date the standard is effective unless a shorter compliance time is specified in the appropriate standard. The department shall establish a final compliance deadline date for any categorical user when the local limits for said user are more restrictive than EPA's categorical pretreatment standards. New source dischargers, and "new users" that are determined to be SIUs, are required to comply with applicable pretreatment standards within the shortest feasible time (not to exceed 90 days from the Packet Page 773 of 895 beginning of discharge). New sources, and "new users" that are determined to be SIUs, shall install and have in operating condition, and shall "start-up" all pollution control equipment required to meet applicable pretreatment standards before beginning to discharge. [Ord. 3487 § 5, 2004; Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.100 Additional pretreatment measures. A. Whenever deemed necessary, the director may require users to restrict their discharge during peak flow periods, designate that certain wastewater be discharged only into specific sewers, relocate and/or consolidate points of discharge, separate sewage wastestreams from industrial wastewater streams, and such other conditions as may be necessary to protect the POTW and determine the user's compliance with the requirements of Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. B. When determined necessary by the director, each user discharging into the POTW shall install and maintain, on his property and at his expense, a suitable storage and flow -control facility to ensure equalization of flow. The director may require the facility to be equipped with alarms and a rate of discharge controller, the regulation of which shall be determined by the director. A wastewater discharge permit or discharge authorization may be issued solely for flow equalization. C. Grease, oil, and sand interceptors shall be provided when, in the opinion of the director, they are necessary for the proper handling of wastewater containing excessive amounts of grease and oil, or sand; except that such interceptors shall not be required for residential users. All interception units shall be of type and capacity approved by the director and shall be so located to be easily accessible for cleaning and inspection. Such interceptors shall be inspected, cleaned, and repaired regularly, as needed, by the user at his expense. D. Users with the potential to discharge flammable substances may be required to install and maintain an approved combustible gas detection meter. [Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.110 Accidental discharge/slug control plans. A. The director may require any user to install, properly operate and maintain, at its own expense, facilities to prevent slug loads or accidental discharges of pollutants to the POTW. The director may require users to produce and/or implement spill plans developed in compliance with applicable OSHA, health, fire, and department regulations applicable to discharges to POTWs. Where deemed necessary by the director, facilities to prevent accidental discharge or slug discharges of pollutants shall be provided and maintained at the user's cost and expense. When such plans are required by the director, they shall contain at least the following elements: 1. Description of discharge practices, including nonroutine batch discharges; 2. Description of stored chemicals; 3. Procedures for immediately notifying the POTW of any accidental or slug discharge. Such notification must also be given for any discharge which would violate any of the standards in ECC 7.91.010 through 7.91.040; and Packet Page 774 of 895 4. Procedures to prevent adverse impact from any accidental or slug discharge. Such procedures include, but are not limited to, inspection and maintenance of storage areas, handling and transfer of materials, loading and unloading operations, control of plant site runoff, worker training, building of containment structures or equipment, measures for containing toxic organic pollutants (including solvents), and/or measures and equipment for emergency response. B. Users shall notify the Edmonds wastewater treatment plant orally or in writing immediately upon the occurrence of a slug load or "accidental discharge" of substances regulated by Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC. The notification shall include location of discharge, date and time thereof, type of waste, concentration and volume, and corrective actions. Any affected user shall be liable for any expense, loss, or damage to the POTW, in addition to the amount of any fines imposed on the city on account thereof under state or federal law. C. Within seven days following an accidental discharge, the user shall submit to the director a detailed written report describing the cause of the discharge and the measures to be taken by the user to prevent similar future occurrences. Such notification shall not relieve the user of any expense, loss, damage, or other liability which may be incurred as a result of damage to the POTW, fish kills, or any other damage to person or property; nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fines, civil penalties, or other liability which may be imposed by Chapters 7.90 through 7.102 ECC or other applicable law. D. Signs shall be permanently posted in conspicuous places on the user's premises advising employees whom to call in the event of a slug or accidental discharge. Employers shall instruct all employees who may cause or discover such a discharge with respect to emergency notification procedures. [Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. 7.91.120 Septic tank wastes. No septic tank wastes shall be discharged to the POTW. [Ord. 3401 § 2, 2002]. Packet Page 775 of 895 APPENDIX K NPDES Permit Packet Page 776 of 895 Page 1 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Issuance Date: October 30, 2009 Effective Date: December 1, 2009 Expiration Date: October 30, 2014 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT No. WA0024058 State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office 3190 160t' Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 In compliance with the provisions of The State of Washington Water Pollution Control Law Chapter 90.48 Revised Code of Washington and The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (The Clean Water Act) Title 33 United States Code, Section 1342 et seq. is auttiorizeci to Plant Location: 200 Second Avenue S. Edmonds, WA 98020 Discharge Location: Outfall 001: Latitude: City of Edmonds Wastewater Treatment Plant 200 Second Avenue S. Edmonds, WA 98020 in accordance wltti ttie special anti (jeneral Conditions ttiat tonow. Plant Type: Conventional Activated Sludge Receiving Water: Puget Sound Central Basin North Diffuser South Diffuser 470 48' 47" N 470 48' 42" N 1220 23' 25" W 1220 23' 27" W Kevin C. Fitzpatrick Water Quality Section Manager Northwest Regional Office Washington State Department of Ecology Packet Page 777 of 895 Page 2 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF PERMIT REPORT SUBMITTALS.....................................................................4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS S1. DISCHARGE LIMITS.............................................................................................................5 A. Effluent Limits B. Mixing Zone Authorization S2. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS.........................................................................................7 A. Monitoring Schedule B. Sampling and Analytical Procedures C. Flow Measurement D. Laboratory Accreditation S3. REPORTING AND RECORDING REQUIREMENTS........................................................11 A. Reporting B. Records Retention C. Recording of Results D. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee E. Reporting Permit Violations F. Other Reporting G. Maintaining a Copy of This Permit S4. FACILITY LOADING ...................................... A. Design Criteria B. Plans for Maintaining Adequate Capacity C. Duty to Mitigate D. Notification of New or Altered Sources E. Infiltration and Inflow Report S5. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE.... A. Certified Operator B. O & M Program C. Short-term Reduction D. Electrical Power Failure E. Prevent Connection of Inflow F. Bypass Procedures G. Operation and Maintenance Manual ...................................................................15 ...........................................................................16 S6. PRETREATMENT.................................................................................................................20 A. General Requirements B. Duty to Enforce Discharge Prohibitions C. Wastewater Discharge Permit Required D. Identification and Reporting of Existing, New, and Proposed Industrial Users E. Characterization of Industrial Users Packet Page 778 of 895 Page 3 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 STSOLID WASTES....................................................................................................................23 A. Solid Waste Handling B. Leachate S8. ACUTE TOXICITY...............................................................................................................23 A. Testing When There Is No Permit Limit for Acute Toxicity B. Sampling and Reporting Requirements S9. CHRONIC TOXICITY..........................................................................................................25 A. Testing When There Is No Permit Limit for Chronic Toxicity B. Sampling and Reporting Requirements S 10. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT RENEWAL....................................................................26 GENERAL CONDITIONS G1. SIGNATORY REQUIREMENTS.....................................................................................27 G2. RIGHT OF INSPECTION AND ENTRY.........................................................................28 G3. PERMIT ACTIONS...........................................................................................................29 G4. REPORTING PLANNED CHANGES..............................................................................30 G5. PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED...........................................................................................30 G6. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND STATUTES.............................................30 G7. TRANSFER OF THIS PERMIT.......................................................................................31 G8. REDUCED PRODUCTION FOR COMPLIANCE..........................................................31 G9. REMOVED SUBSTANCES.............................................................................................31 G10. DUTY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION...........................................................................32 G11. OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR...........................................................................32 G12. ADDITIONAL MONITORING........................................................................................32 G13. PAYMENT OF FEES........................................................................................................32 G14. PENALTIES FOR VIOLATING PERMIT CONDITIONS.............................................32 G15. UPSET...............................................................................................................................32 G16. PROPERTY RIGHTS........................................................................................................33 G17. DUTY TO COMPLY........................................................................................................33 G18. TOXIC POLLUTANTS.....................................................................................................33 G19. PENALTIES FOR TAMPERING.....................................................................................33 G20. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES.........................................................................................33 G21. CONTRACT REVIEW.....................................................................................................34 APPENDIXA................................................................................................................................35 Packet Page 779 of 895 Page 4 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 SUMMARY OF PERMIT REPORT SUBMITTALS Refer to the Special and General Conditions of this permit for additional submittal requirements. Permit Submittal Frequency First Submittal Date Section S3.A Discharge Monitoring Report 1/month November 15, 2009 S3.E Reporting Permit Violations As necessary S4.13 Plans for Maintaining Adequate Capacity As necessary S4.D Notification of New or Altered Sources As necessary S4.E Infiltration and Inflow Report 1/ ear June 30, 2010 S5.G Operations and Maintenance Manual As necessary S6.E Characterization of Industrial Users 1/ ermit cycle October 1, 2012 S8.13 Acute Toxicity Effluent Test Results 2/permit cycle Testing to occur during with Permit Renewal Application June 2013 and December 2013. Submit reports with renewal application. S9.B Chronic Toxicity Effluent Test Results 2/permit cycle Testing to occur during with Permit Renewal Application August 2013 and February 2014. Submit reports with renewal application. S10 Application for Permit Renewal I/ ermit cycle Aril 1, 2014 GI Notice of Change in Authorization As necessary G4 Reporting Planned Changes As necessary G5 Engineering Report for Construction or As necessary Modification Activities Packet Page 780 of 895 Page 5 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 SPECIAL CONDITIONS In this permit, the word "must" denotes an action that is mandatory and is equivalent to the word "shall" used in previous permits. S1. DISCHARGE LIMITS A. Effluent Limits All discharges and activities authorized by this permit must comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. The discharge of any of the following pollutants more frequently than, or at a level in excess of, that identified and authorized by this permit violates the terms and conditions of this permit. Beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting through the expiration date, the Permittee may discharge municipal wastewater at the permitted location subject to compliance with the following limits: EFFLUENT LIMITS: OUTFALL # 001 Parameter Average Monthly a Average Weekly b Carbonaceous Biochemical 25 mg/L, 2460 lbs/day 40 mg/L, 3936 lbs/day Oxygen Demand 5-day)85% removal of influent CBOD5 Total Suspended Solids 30 mg/L, 2952 lbs/day 45 mg/L, 4430 lbs/day 85% removal of influent TSS Fecal Coliform Bacteria' 200/100 mL 400/100 mL pH d Daily minimum is equal to or greater than 6.0 and the daily maximum is less than orequal to 9.0. Parameter Average Monthly Maximum Daily e Total Residual Chlorine 191 P g/L 442 /L a Average monthly effluent limit means the highest allowable average of daily discharges over a calendar month. To calculate the discharge value to compare to the limit, you add the value of each daily discharge measured during a calendar month and divide this sum by the total number of daily discharges measured. See footnote c for fecal coliform calculations. b Average weekly discharge limitation means the highest allowable average of "daily discharges" over a calendar week, calculated as the sum of all "daily discharges" measured during a calendar week divided by the number of "daily discharges" measured during that week. See footnote c for fecal coliform calculations. e To calculate the average monthly and average weekly values for fecal coliforms, you must use the geometric mean. Ecology gives directions to calculate this value in publication No. 04-10-020, Information Manual for Treatment Plant Operators, available at: hi://www.ecy.wa.goy/pubL/0410020.pdf d Indicates the range of permitted values. The Permittee must report the instantaneous maximum and minimum pH monthly. Do not average pH values. e Maximum daily effluent limit means the highest allowable daily discharge. The daily discharge means the discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day. For concentration units of measurement, the daily discharge is the average measurement of the pollutant over the day. This does not apply to pH. Packet Page 781 of 895 Page 6 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 B. Mixing Zone Authorization The following paragraphs define the maximum boundaries of the mixing zones for Outfall #001. Descriptions apply for both the north and south diffusers. The following diagram illustrates the relationship and sizes of the chronic and acute mixing zones around the two diffusers. P 1.5 i+ Chronic Mixing Zone WAC 173-201A-400(7)(b)(i) specifies mixing zones must not extend in any horizontal direction from the discharge ports for a distance greater than 200 feet plus the depth of water over the discharge ports, as measured during mean lower low water (MLLW). As illustrated above, the mixing zone consists of oval -shaped regions centered on each diffuser line. This permit authorizes the chronic mixing zone to occupy a region measuring 972 feet in length in the direction perpendicular to the diffuser lines and 672 feet in length in the direction parallel to the diffuser lines. The mixing zone extends from the seabed to the top of the water surface. Chronic aquatic life criteria and human health criteria must be met at the edge of the chronic zone. Packet Page 782 of 895 Page 7 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 Acute Mixing Zone WAC 173-201A-400(8)(b) specifies that in estuarine waters a zone where acute criteria may be exceeded must not extend beyond 10% of the distance established for the maximum or chronic zone as measured independently from the discharge ports. The acute mixing zones are oval regions around each diffuser line that extends no more than 25.6 feet measured from the center of each discharge port. The mixing zone extends from the seabed to the top of the water surface. Acute aquatic life criteria must be met at the edge of the acute zone. Available Dilution (dilution factor) Acute Aquatic Life Criteria 0 Chronic Aquatic Life Criteria 143 I Human Health Criteria — Carcinogen 143 I Human Health Criteria — Non -carcinogen 143 S2. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS A. Monitoring Schedule The Permittee must monitor in accordance with the following schedule and must use the laboratory method, detection level (DL), and quantitation level (QL) specified in Appendix A. Alternative methods from 40 CFR Part 136 are acceptable if the DL and QL are equivalent to those specified in Appendix A: Parameter Units Minimum Sampling Sample Type Frequency 1 Wastewater Influent Wastewater Influent means the raw sewage flow. Sample the wastewater entering the headworks of the treatment plant excluding any side -stream returns from inside the plant. Flow MGD Daily Continuous a BOD5 m /L 1/Week 24-hr Composite b BOD5 lbs/da 1/Week Calculated f CBOD5 m /L 3/Week e 24-hr Composite b TSS m /L 3/Week e 24-hr Composite b TSS lbs/da 3/Week e Calculated f 2 Final Wastewater Effluent Final Wastewater Effluent means wastewater which is exiting, or has exited, the last treatment process or operation. Typically, this is after or at the exit from the chlorine contact chamber or other disinfection process. The Permittee may take effluent samples for the CBOD analysis before or after the disinfection process. If taken after, dechlorinate and reseed the sample. Packet Page 783 of 895 Page 8 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 Parameter Units Minimum Sampling Sample Type Frequency CBOD5 m /L 3/Week e 24-hr Composite b CBOD5 lbs/da 3/Week e Calculated f CBOD5 % removal Monthly 9 Calculated TSS m /L 3/Week e 24-hr Composite b TSS lbs/da 3/Week e Calculated f I TSS % removal Monthly 9 Calculated ° I Chlorine m /L Daily Grab d I Fecal Coliform Organisms /100 ml 3/Week e Grab d I H Standard Units Daily Grab d Temperature °C 3/Week e Grab d Temperature grab sampling must occur when the effluent is at or near its daily maximum temperature, which is usually in the late afternoon. 3 Whole Effluent ToxicityTestin — Final Wastewater Effluent Acute Toxicity Testing See Condition S8 for testing requirements. 2/permit cycle 24-hr Composite b Chronic Toxicity Testing See Condition E for testing ,requirements. 2/permit cycle 24-hr Composite b 4 Effluent Characterization — Final Wastewater Effluent Total Ammonia m /L N Monthly 9 24-hr Composite b Total K'eldahl Nitrogen m /L N Monthly 9 24-hr Composite b Nitrate -Nitrite Nitrogen m L N Monthly 9 24-hr Composite b Ortho-Phosphorus PO4 m /L P Monthly 9 24-hr Composite b Total Phosphorus m /L P Monthly 9 24-hr Composite b 5 Permit Application Requirements — Final Wastewater Effluent Temperature Degrees Celsius As required above As required above CBOD5 m /L As required above As required above Fecal Coliform Organisms / 100ml As required above As required above Total Ammonia m /L N As required above As required above Total Residual Chlorine m /L As required above As required above Dissolved Oxygen m /L Once per year Grab d Total K'eldahl Nitrogen m /L N As required above As required above Nitrate plus Nitrite N m /L N As required above As required above Oil and Grease m /L Once per year Grab d Phosphorus Total m /L P As required above As required above Total Dissolved Solids m /L Once per year 24-hr Composite b Total Hardness m /L Once per year h 24-hr Composite b Cyanide µg/L Once per year h 24-hr Composite b or Grab d Packet Page 784 of 895 Page 9 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 Parameter Units Minimum Sampling Sample Type Frequency Total Phenolic Compounds /L Once per year h 24-hr Composite b Priority Pollutants (PP) - µg/L Once per year h 24-hr Composite b metals or Grab d PP — Volatile Organic µg/L Once per year h Grab d Compounds PP — Acid -extractable µg/L Once per year h 24-hr Composite b compounds PP — Base -neutral compounds I gg/1L, I Once per year h 24-hr Composite b The Permittee must record and report the wastewater treatment plant flow discharged on the day it collects the sample for priority pollutant testing with the discharge monitoring report. Footnotes for Monitoring Tables a Continuous means uninterrupted except for brief lengths of time for calibration, for power failure, or for unanticipated equipment repair or maintenance. The Permittee must sample every hour when continuous monitoring is not possible. b 24-hour composite means a series of individual samples collected over a 24-hour period into a single container, and analyzed as one sample. c Calculate the percent (%) removal of BOD and TSS using the following algorithm (concentrations in mg/L): (Average Monthly Influent Concentration - Average Monthly Effluent Concentration)/Average Monthly Influent Concentration. d Grab means an individual sample collected over a fifteen (15)-minute, or less, period. e 3/week means three (3) times during each calendar week and on a rotational basis throughout the days of the week, except weekends and holidays. f Calculation means figured concurrently with the respective sample, using the following formula: Concentration in m /L X Flow in MGD X Conversion Factor 8.34 = lbs/da 9 Monthly means once every calendar month during alternate weeks. h See Appendix A for the required detection (DL) or quantitation (QL) levels. Report single analytical values below detection as "less than (detection level)" where (detection level) is the numeric value specified in attachment A. Report single analytical values between the agency -required detection and quantitation levels with qualifier code of j following the value. To calculate the average value (monthly average): • Use the reported numeric value for all parameters measured between the agency -required detection value and the agency -required quantitation value. • For values reported below detection, use one-half the detection value if the lab detected the parameter in another sample for the reporting period. • For values reported below detection, use zero if the lab did not detect the parameter in another sample for the reporting period. If the Permittee is unable to obtain the required DL and QL in its effluent due to matrix effects, the Permittee must submit a matrix -specific MDL and a QL to Ecology with appropriate laboratory documentation. Packet Page 785 of 895 Page 10 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 B. Sampling and Analytical Procedures Samples and measurements taken to meet the requirements of this permit must represent the volume and nature of the monitored parameters. The Permittee must conduct representative sampling of any unusual discharge or discharge condition, including bypasses, upsets, and maintenance -related conditions that may affect effluent quality. Sampling and analytical methods used to meet the monitoring requirements specified in this permit must conform to the latest revision of the Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants contained in 40 CFR Part 136. The Permittee has demonstrated through comparative analysis that Hach Method 10360 "Luminescence Measurement of Dissolved Oxygen in Water and Wastewater" produces results equivalent to methods listed in 40 CFR Part 136. This permit authorizes the use of the Hach method listed above for BOD5 and CBOD5 analysis. C. Flow Measurement The Permittee must: Select and use appropriate flow measurement devices and methods consistent with accepted scientific practices. 2. Install, calibrate, and maintain these devices to ensure the accuracy of the measurements is consistent with the accepted industry standard and the manufacturer's recommendation for that type of device. 3. Calibrate flow monitoring devices at the minimum frequency recommended by the device manufacturer. Permittee must calibrate flow devices at a minimum frequency of at least one calibration per year if the manufacturer does not provide specific recommendations. 4. Maintain calibration records for at least three years. D. Laboratory Accreditation The Permittee must ensure that all monitoring data required by Ecology is prepared by a laboratory registered or accredited under the provisions of Chapter 173-50 WAC, Accreditation of Environmental Laboratories. Flow, temperature, settleable solids, conductivity, pH, and internal process control parameters are exempt from this requirement. Packet Page 786 of 895 Page 11 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 S3. REPORTING AND RECORDING REQUIREMENTS The Permittee must monitor and report in accordance with the following conditions. Falsification of information submitted to Ecology is a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit. A. Reporting The first monitoring period begins on the effective date of the permit. The Permittee must: Submit monitoring results each month. 2. Summarize, report, and submit monitoring data obtained during each monitoring period on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) form provided, or otherwise approved, by Ecology. 3. Submit DMR forms monthly whether or not the facility was discharging. If the facility did not discharge during a given monitoring period, submit the form as required with the words "NO DISCHARGE" entered in place of the monitoring results. 4. Ensure that DMR forms are postmarked or received by Ecology no later than the 15th day of the month following the completed monitoring period, unless otherwise specified in this permit. 5. Submit priority pollutant analysis data no later than forty-five (45) days following the monitoring. 6. Send report(s) to Ecology at: Water Quality Permit Coordinator Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 3190 160th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98008-5452 All laboratory reports providing data for organic and metal parameters must include the following information: sampling date, sample location, date of analysis, parameter name, CAS number, analytical method/number, method detection limit (MDL), laboratory practical quantitation limit (PQL), reporting units, and concentration detected. Analytical results from samples sent to a contract laboratory must include information on the chain of custody, the analytical method, QA/QC results, and documentation of accreditation for the parameter. Packet Page 787 of 895 Page 12 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 B. Records Retention The Permittee must retain records of all monitoring information for a minimum of three (3) years. Such information must include all calibration and maintenance records and all original recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit. The Permittee must extend this period of retention during the course of any unresolved litigation regarding the discharge of pollutants by the Permittee or when requested by Ecology. C. Recording of Results For each measurement or sample taken, the Permittee must record the following information: The date, exact place, method, and time of sampling or measurement. 2. The individual who performed the sampling or measurement. 3. The dates the analyses were performed. 4. The individual who performed the analyses. 5. The analytical techniques or methods used. 6. The results of all analyses. D. Additional Monitoring by the Permittee If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by Condition S2 of this permit, then the Permittee must include the results of such monitoring in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the Permittee's DMR. E. Reporting Permit Violations The Permittee must take the following actions when it violates or is unable to comply with any permit condition: Immediately take action to stop, contain, and cleanup unauthorized discharges or otherwise stop the noncompliance and correct the problem. If applicable, immediately repeat sampling and analysis. Submit the results of any repeat sampling to Ecology within thirty (30) days of sampling. Packet Page 788 of 895 2. 3 Page 13 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 Immediate Reporting The Permittee must immediately report any failure of the disinfection system, any collection system overflows which may reach marine surface waters, or any plant bypass discharging to a shellfish area to the Department of Ecology and the Department of Health, Shellfish Program at the numbers listed below: Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office Department of Health, Shellfish Program Twenty -four-hour Reporting 425-649-7000 360-236-3330 (business hours) 360-786-4183 (24 hours) The Permittee must report the following occurrences of noncompliance by telephone, to Ecology at 425-649-7000, within 24 hours from the time the Permittee becomes aware of any of the following circumstances: a. Any noncompliance that may endanger health or the environment, unless previously reported under subpart 1, above. b. Any unanticipated bypass of the treatment system, including any partial bypass of primary -treated wastewater around secondary treatment when flows exceed peak capacity of the secondary system. Notification is required under this condition regardless of whether the bypass exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See Part S5.F, "Bypass Procedures"). Any upset that exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit (See G.15, "Upset") d. Any violation of a maximum daily or instantaneous maximum discharge limitation for any of the pollutants in Section S LA of this permit. e. Any overflow prior to the treatment works, whether or not such overflow endangers health or the environment or exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit. Report Within Five Days The Permittee must also provide a written submission within five days of the time that the Permittee becomes aware of any event required to be reported under subparts 1 or 2, above. The written submission must contain: a. In A description of the noncompliance and its cause. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times. Packet Page 789 of 895 Page 14 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 The estimated time noncompliance is expected to continue if it has not been corrected. d. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance. If the noncompliance involves an overflow prior to the treatment works, an estimate of the quantity (in gallons) of untreated overflow. 4. Waiver of Written Reports Ecology may waive the written report required in subpart 3, above, on a case -by -case basis upon request if a timely oral report has been received. 5. All Other Permit Violation Reporting The Permittee must report all permit violations, which do not require immediate or within 24-hour reporting, when it submits monitoring reports for S3.A ("Reporting"). The reports must contain the information listed in paragraph E.3, above. Compliance with these requirements does not relieve the Permittee from responsibility to maintain continuous compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit or the resulting liability for failure to comply. 6. Report Submittal The Permittee must submit reports to the address listed in S3. F. Other Reporting The Permittee must report a spill of oil or hazardous materials in accordance with the requirements of RCW 90.56.280 and Chapter 173-303-145. You can obtain further instructions at the following website: http://www.ecy.wa.goy/pro rg ams/s]2ills/other/reportaspill.htm . When the Permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application, or in any report to Ecology, it must submit such facts or information promptly. G. Maintaining a Copy of This Permit The Permittee must keep a copy of this permit at the facility and make it available upon request to Ecology inspectors. Packet Page 790 of 895 Page 15 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 S4. FACILITY LOADING A. Design Criteria The flows or waste loads for the permitted facility must not exceed the following design criteria: Maximum Month Design Flow (MMDF) 11.8 MGD Peak Daily Design Flow (PDDF) 21.5 MGD BOD5 influent loading for maximum month 20,000 lb/day TSS influent loading for maximum month 19,200 lb/day B. Plans for Maintaining Adequate Capacity The Permittee must submit to Ecology a plan and a schedule for continuing to maintain capacity when: The actual flow or waste load reaches 85 percent of any one of the maximum monthly design criteria in S4.A for three consecutive months. 2. The projected increase would reach design capacity within five years. The plan and schedule for continuing to maintain capacity must be sufficient to achieve the effluent limits and other conditions of this permit. This plan must identify any of the following actions or any other actions necessary to meet the objective of maintaining capacity. a. Analysis of the present design, including the introduction of any process modifications that would establish the ability of the existing facility to achieve the effluent limits and other requirements of this permit at specific levels in excess of the existing design criteria specified in paragraph A, above. b. Reduction or elimination of excessive infiltration and inflow of uncontaminated ground and surface water into the sewer system. c. Limitation on future sewer extensions or connections or additional waste loads. d. Modification or expansion of facilities necessary to accommodate increased flow or waste load. e. Reduction of industrial or commercial flows or waste loads to allow for increasing sanitary flow or waste load. Engineering documents associated with the plan must meet the requirements of WAC 173-240-060, "Engineering Report," and be approved by Ecology prior to any construction. Packet Page 791 of 895 Page 16 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 C. Du . to Mitigate The Permittee must take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in violation of this permit that has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. D. Notification of New or Altered Sources The Permittee must submit written notice to Ecology whenever any new discharge or a substantial change in volume or character of an existing discharge into the POTW is proposed which: a. Would interfere with the operation of, or exceed the design capacity of, any portion of the POTW; b. Is not part of an approved general sewer plan or approved plans and specifications; or c. Would be subject to pretreatment standards under 40 CFR Part 403 and Section 307(b) of the Clean Water Act. 2. This notice must include an evaluation of the POTW's ability to adequately transport and treat the added flow and/or waste load, the quality and volume of effluent to be discharged to the POTW, and the anticipated impact on the Permittee's effluent [40 CFR 122.42(b)]. E. Infiltration and Inflow Report The Permittee must submit to Ecology a report summarizing progress made in implementing I/I corrective measures identified in the City of Edmonds 2006 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan. The intent of this report is to provide a brief update on the status of projects. The report must present an updated schedule for projects, identify completed projects, and identify changes in project priority. The Permittee must submit the report by June 30, 2010, and annually thereafter. S5. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE The Permittee must at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) that are installed to achieve compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes keeping a daily operation logbook (paper or electronic), adequate laboratory controls, and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision of the permit requires the Permittee to operate backup or auxiliary facilities or similar systems only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Packet Page 792 of 895 Page 17 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 A. Certified Operator This permitted facility must be operated by an operator certified by the State of Washington for at least a Class IV plant. This operator must be in responsible charge of the day-to-day operation of the wastewater treatment plant. An operator certified for at least a Class III plant must be in charge during all regularly -scheduled shifts. B. O & M Program The Permittee must: Institute an adequate operation and maintenance program for the entire sewage system. 2. Keep maintenance records on all major electrical and mechanical components of the treatment plant, as well as the sewage system and pumping stations. Such records must clearly specify the frequency and type of maintenance recommended by the manufacturer and must show the frequency and type of maintenance performed. 3. Make maintenance records available for inspection at all times. C. Short-term Reduction The Permittee must schedule any facility maintenance, which might require interruption of wastewater treatment and degrade effluent quality, during noncritical water quality periods and carry this maintenance out in a manner approved by Ecology. If a Permittee contemplates a reduction in the level of treatment that would cause a violation of permit discharge limits on a short-term basis for any reason, and such reduction cannot be avoided, the Permittee must: 1. Give written notification to Ecology, if possible, thirty (30) days prior to such activities. 2. Detail the reasons for, length of time of, and the potential effects of the reduced level of treatment. This notification does not relieve the Permittee of its obligations under this permit. D. Electrical Power Failure The Permittee must ensure that adequate safeguards prevent the discharge of untreated wastes or wastes not treated in accordance with the requirements of this permit during electrical power failure at the treatment plant and/or sewage lift stations. Adequate safeguards include, but are not limited to, alternate power sources, standby generator(s), or retention of inadequately treated wastes. Packet Page 793 of 895 Page 18 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 The Permittee must maintain Reliability Class II (EPA 430/9-74-001) at the wastewater treatment plant. Reliability Class II requires a backup power source sufficient to operate all vital components and critical lighting and ventilation during peak wastewater flow conditions. Vital components used to support the secondary processes (i.e., mechanical aerators or aeration basin air compressors) need not be operable to full levels of treatment, but must be sufficient to maintain the biota. E. Prevent Connection of Inflow The Permittee must strictly enforce its sewer ordinances and not allow the connection of inflow (roof drains, foundation drains, etc.) to the sanitary sewer system. F. Bypass Procedures This permit prohibits a bypass which is the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. Ecology may take enforcement action against a Permittee for a bypass unless one of the following circumstances (1, 2, or 3) applies. Bypass for essential maintenance without the potential to cause violation of permit limits or conditions. Bypass is authorized if it is for essential maintenance and does not have the potential to cause violations of limits or other conditions of this permit, or adversely impact public health as determined by Ecology prior to the bypass. The Permittee must submit prior notice, if possible, at least ten (10) days before the date of the bypass. 2. Bypass which is unavoidable, unanticipated, and results in noncompliance of this permit. This bypass is permitted only if: a. Bypass is unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage. "Severe property damage" means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which would cause them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. b. No feasible alternatives to the bypass exist, such as: • The use of auxiliary treatment facilities. • Retention of untreated wastes. • Stopping production. Packet Page 794 of 895 Page 19 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 • Maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime, but not if the Permittee should have installed adequate backup equipment in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass. • Transport of untreated wastes to another treatment facility or preventative maintenance, or transport of untreated wastes to another treatment facility. c. Ecology is properly notified of the bypass as required in Condition S3.E of this permit. 3. If bypass is anticipated and has the potential to result in noncompliance of this permit. a. The Permittee must notify Ecology at least thirty (30) days before the planned date of bypass. The notice must contain: • A description of the bypass and its cause. • An analysis of all known alternatives which would eliminate, reduce, or mitigate the need for bypassing. • A cost-effectiveness analysis of alternatives, including comparative resource damage assessment. • The minimum and maximum duration of bypass under each alternative. • A recommendation as to the preferred alternative for conducting the bypass. • The projected date of bypass initiation. • A statement of compliance with SEPA. • A request for modification of water quality standards as provided for in WAC 173-201A-410, if an exceedance of any water quality standard is anticipated. • Details of the steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the bypass. b. For probable construction bypasses, the Permittee must notify Ecology of the need to bypass as early in the planning process as possible. The Permittee must consider the analysis required above during preparation of the engineering report or facilities plan and plans and specifications and must include these to the extent practical. In cases where the Permittee determines the probable need to bypass early, the Permittee must continue to analyze conditions up to and including the construction period in an effort to minimize or eliminate the bypass. c. Ecology will consider the following prior to issuing an Administrative Order for this type of bypass: Packet Page 795 of 895 Page 20 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 • If the bypass is necessary to perform construction or maintenance -related activities essential to meet the requirements of this permit. • If feasible alternatives to bypass exist, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, stopping production, maintenance during normal periods of equipment down time, or transport of untreated wastes to another treatment facility. • If the Permittee planned and scheduled the bypass to minimize adverse effects on the public and the environment. After consideration of the above and the adverse effects of the proposed bypass and any other relevant factors, Ecology will approve or deny the request. Ecology will give the public an opportunity to comment on bypass incidents of significant duration, to the extent feasible. Ecology will approve a request to bypass by issuing an Administrative Order under RCW 90.48.120. G. Operation and Maintenance Manual The Permittee must: Keep the Ecology -approved Operation and Maintenance Manual at the permitted facility. 2. Follow the instructions and procedures of this manual, including any modified instructions and procedures deemed appropriate by the treatment plant's manger. Review the O&M Manual at least annually to ensure contents reflect current equipment and systems used at the facility. 4. Submit to Ecology for review and approval substantial changes or updates to the O&M Manual whenever such changes are incorporated into the manual. S6. PRETREATMENT A. General Requirements The Permittee must work with Ecology to ensure that all commercial and industrial users of the publicly owned treatment works (POTW) comply with the pretreatment regulations in 40 CFR Part 403 and any additional regulations that the Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) may promulgate under Section 307(b) (pretreatment) and 308 (reporting) of the Federal Clean Water Act. Packet Page 796 of 895 Page 21 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 B. Duty to Enforce Discharge Prohibitions Under 40 CFR 403.5(a), the Permittee must not authorize or knowingly allow the discharge of any pollutants into its POTW which may be reasonably expected to cause pass -through or interference, or which otherwise violate general or specific discharge prohibitions contained in 40 CFR Part 403.5 or WAG 173-216-060. 2. The Permittee must not authorize or knowingly allow the introduction of any of the following into their treatment works: a. Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the POTW (including, but not limited to waste streams with a closed cup flashpoint of less than 140 degrees Fahrenheit or 60 degrees Centigrade using the test methods specified in 40 CFR 261.21). b. Pollutants which will cause corrosive structural damage to the POTW, but in no case discharges with pH lower than 5.0, or greater than 11.0 standard units, unless the works are specifically designed to accommodate such discharges. c. Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts that could cause obstruction to the flow in sewers or otherwise interfere with the operation of the POTW. d. Any pollutant, including oxygen -demanding pollutants (BOD, etc.), released in a discharge at a flow rate and/or pollutant concentration which will cause interference with the POTW. e. Petroleum oil, nonbiodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral origin in amounts that will cause interference or pass -through. f. Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes within the POTW in a quantity which may cause acute worker health and safety problems. g. Heat in amounts that will inhibit biological activity in the POTW resulting in interference but in no case heat in such quantities such that the temperature at the POTW headworks exceeds 40 degrees Centigrade (104 degrees Fahrenheit) unless Ecology, upon request of the Permittee, approves, in writing, alternate temperature limits. h. Any trucked or hauled pollutants, except at discharge points designated by the Permittee. i. Wastewaters prohibited to be discharged to the POTW by the Dangerous Waste Regulations (Chapter 173-303 WAC), unless authorized under the Domestic Sewage Exclusion (WAC 173-303-071). Packet Page 797 of 895 Page 22 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 3. The Permittee must also not allow the following discharges to the POTW unless approved in writing by Ecology: a. Noncontact cooling water in significant volumes. b. Stormwater and other direct inflow sources. c. Wastewaters significantly affecting system hydraulic loading, which do not require treatment, or would not be afforded a significant degree of treatment by the system. 4. The Permittee must notify Ecology if any industrial user violates the prohibitions listed in this section (S6.B), and initiate enforcement action to promptly curtail any such discharge. C. Wastewater Discharge Permit Required The Permittee must require all non -domestic discharges to apply for a permit, and may not allow any significant industrial users (SIUs) to discharge wastewater to the Permittee's sewer system until such user has received a wastewater discharge permit from Ecology in accordance with Chapter 90.48 RCW and Chapter 173-216 WAC. D. Identification and Reporting of Existing, New, and Proposed Industrial Users The Permittee must take continuous, routine measures to identify all existing, new, and proposed SIUs and potential significant industrial users (PSIUs) discharging or proposing to discharge to the Permittee's sewer system (see Appendix B of the fact sheet for definitions). 2. Within thirty (30) days of becoming aware of an unpermitted existing, new, or proposed industrial user who may be an SIU, the Permittee must notify such user by registered mail that, if classified as an SIU, they must apply to Ecology and obtain a State Waste Discharge Permit. The Permittee must send a copy of this notification letter to Ecology within this same 30-day period. 3. The Permittee must also notify all Potential SIUs (PSIUs), as they are identified, that if their classification should change to an SIU, they must apply to Ecology for a State Waste Discharge Permit within thirty (30) days of such change. E. Characterization of Industrial Users The Permittee must submit a report to Ecology that characterizes the types of commercial and industrial businesses that contribute flow to the Permittee's treatment plant. The intent of this report is to document the potential influence non -domestic wastewater sources have on the treatment plant. The report must also describe steps the Permittee currently takes to manage non -domestic wastewater flows to the facility from sources that do not meet the criteria of "significant industrial user." Permittee must Packet Page 798 of 895 Page 23 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 submit report to Ecology by October 1, 2012. If, during the development of this report, the Permittee identifies any existing or new Significant Industrial Users, the Permittee must notify Ecology of those users as required by Condition S.6.1), above. S7. SOLID WASTES A. Solid Waste Handling The Permittee must handle and dispose of all solid waste material in such a manner as to prevent its entry into state ground or surface water. B. Leachate The Permittee must not allow leachate from its solid waste material to enter state waters without providing all known, available, and reasonable methods of treatment, nor allow such leachate to cause violations of the State Surface Water Quality Standards, Chapter 173-201A WAC, or the State Ground Water Quality Standards, Chapter 173-200 WAC. The Permittee must apply for a permit or permit modification as may be required for such discharges to state ground or surface waters. S8. ACUTE TOXICITY A. Testing When There Is No Permit Limit for Acute Toxicity The Permittee must: Conduct acute toxicity testing on final effluent during June 2013 and December 2013. 2. Submit the results to Ecology with the permit renewal application. See Condition S.11 for renewal application submittal date. 3. Conduct acute toxicity testing on a series of at least five concentrations of effluent, including 100% effluent, and a control. 4. Use each of the following species and protocols for each acute toxicity test: Acute Toxicity Tests Species Method I Fathead minnow 96-hour Pimephales promelas EPA-821-R-02-012 static -renewal test Daphnid 48-hour static test Ceriodaphnia dubia, EPA-821-R-02-012 Daphnia pulex, or Daphnia magna Packet Page 799 of 895 Page 24 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 B. Sampling and Reporting Requirements The Permittee must submit all reports for toxicity testing in accordance with the most recent version of Department of Ecology Publication No. WQ-R-95-80, Laboratory Guidance and Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Review Criteria. Reports must contain bench sheets and reference toxicant results for test methods. If the lab provides the toxicity test data in electronic format for entry into Ecology's database, then the Permittee must send the data to Ecology along with the test report, bench sheets, and reference toxicant results. 2. The Permittee must collect 24-hour composite effluent samples for toxicity testing. The Permittee must cool the samples to 0 - 6 degrees Celsius during collection and send them to the lab immediately upon completion. The lab must begin the toxicity testing as soon as possible but no later than 36 hours after sampling was completed. 3. The laboratory must conduct water quality measurements on all samples and test solutions for toxicity testing, as specified in the most recent version of Department of Ecology Publication No. WQ-R-95-80, Laboratory Guidance and Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Review Criteria. 4. All toxicity tests must meet quality assurance criteria and test conditions specified in the most recent versions of the EPA methods listed in Subsection A and the Department of Ecology Publication No. WQ-R-95-80, Laboratory Guidance and Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Review Criteria. If Ecology determines any test results to be invalid or anomalous, the Permittee must repeat the testing with freshly collected effluent. The laboratory must use control water and dilution water meeting the requirements of the EPA methods listed in Subsection A or pristine natural water of sufficient quality for good control performance. 6. The Permittee must conduct whole effluent toxicity tests on an unmodified sample of final effluent. 7. The Permittee may choose to conduct a full dilution series test during compliance testing in order to determine dose response. In this case, the series must have a minimum of five effluent concentrations and a control. The series of concentrations must include the acute critical effluent concentration (ACEC). The ACEC equals = effluent. All whole effluent toxicity tests, effluent screening tests, and rapid screening tests that involve hypothesis testing must comply with the acute statistical power standard of 29% as defined in WAC 173-205-020. If the test does not meet the power standard, the Permittee must repeat the test on a fresh sample with an increased number of replicates to increase the power. Packet Page 800 of 895 Page 25 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 9. Reports of individual characterization or compliance test results must be submitted to Ecology within sixty (60) days after each sample date. S9. CHRONIC TOXICITY A. Testing When There Is No Permit Limit for Chronic Toxicity The Permittee must: 1. Conduct chronic toxicity testing on final effluent during August 2013 and February 2014. 2. Submit the results to Ecology with the permit renewal application. See Condition S.I 1 for renewal application submittal date. 3. Conduct chronic toxicity testing on a series of at least five concentrations of effluent and a control. This series of dilutions must include the acute critical effluent concentration (ACEC) and the chronic critical effluent concentration (CCEC). The ACEC equals 2.7% effluent and the CCEC equals 0.7% effluent. 4. Compare the ACEC to the control using hypothesis testing at the 0.05 level of significance as described in Appendix H, EPA/600/4-89/001. Perform chronic toxicity tests with all of the following species and the most recent version of the following protocols: Saltwater Chronic Test Species Method To smelt survival and growth Atherino s a finis EPA/600/R-95/136 Mysid shrimp survival and growth Mysidopsis Bahia/ Americam sis Bahia EPA-821-R-02-014 B. Sampling and Reporting Requirements The Permittee must submit all reports for toxicity testing in accordance with the most recent version of Department of Ecology Publication No. WQ-R-95-80, Laboratory Guidance and Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Review Criteria. Reports must contain bench sheets and reference toxicant results for test methods. If the lab provides the toxicity test data in electronic format for entry into Ecology's database, then the Permittee must send the data to Ecology along with the test report, bench sheets, and reference toxicant results. 2. The Permittee must collect 24-hour composite effluent samples for toxicity testing. The Permittee must cool the samples to 0 - 6 degrees Celsius during collection and send them to the lab immediately upon completion. The lab must begin the toxicity testing as soon as possible but no later than 36 hours after sampling was completed. Packet Page 801 of 895 Page 26 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 3. The laboratory must conduct water quality measurements on all samples and test solutions for toxicity testing, as specified in the most recent version of Department of Ecology Publication No. WQ-R-95-80, Laboratory Guidance and Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Review Criteria. 4. All toxicity tests must meet quality assurance criteria and test conditions specified in the most recent versions of the EPA methods listed in Subsection A and the Department of Ecology Publication No. WQ-R-95-80, Laboratory Guidance and Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Review Criteria. If Ecology determines any test results to be invalid or anomalous, the Permittee must repeat the testing with freshly collected effluent. 5. The laboratory must use control water and dilution water meeting the requirements of the EPA methods listed in Subsection A or pristine natural water of sufficient quality for good control performance. 6. The Permittee must conduct whole effluent toxicity tests on an unmodified sample of final effluent. 7. The Permittee may choose to conduct a full dilution series test during compliance testing in order to determine dose response. In this case, the series must have a minimum of five effluent concentrations and a control. The series of concentrations must include the CCEC and the ACEC. The CCEC and the ACEC may either substitute for the effluent concentrations that are closest to them in the dilution series or be extra effluent concentrations. The CCEC equals 0.7% effluent. The ACEC equals 2.7% effluent. 8. All whole effluent toxicity tests that involve hypothesis testing must comply with the chronic statistical power standard of 39% as defined in WAC 173-205-020. If the test does not meet the power standard, the Permittee must repeat the test on a fresh sample with an increased number of replicates to increase the power. 9. Reports of individual characterization or compliance test results must be submitted to Ecology within sixty (60) days after each sample date. 510. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT RENEWAL The Permittee must submit an application for renewal of this permit by April 1, 2014. Packet Page 802 of 895 Page 27 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 GENERAL CONDITIONS G1. SIGNATORY REQUIREMENTS A. All applications, reports, or information submitted to Ecology must be signed and certified. In the case of corporations, by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this section, a responsible corporate officer means: (i) A president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision making functions for the corporation, or (ii) The manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long-term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. 2. In the case of a partnership, by a general partner. 3. In the case of sole proprietorship, by the proprietor. 4. In the case of a municipal, state, or other public facility, by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. Applications for permits for domestic wastewater facilities that are either owned or operated by, or under contract to, a public entity shall be submitted by the public entity. B. All reports required by this permit and other information requested by Ecology must be signed by a person described above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: The authorization is made in writing by a person described above and submitted to Ecology. Packet Page 803 of 895 Page 28 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 2. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility, such as the position of plant manager, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.) C. Changes to authorization. If an authorization under paragraph 13.2, above, is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of paragraph B.2, above, must be submitted to Ecology prior to or together with any reports, information, or applications to be signed by an authorized representative. D. Certification. Any person signing a document under this section must make the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. " G2. RIGHT OF INSPECTION AND ENTRY The Permittee must allow an authorized representative of Ecology, upon the presentation of credentials and such other documents as may be required by law: A. To enter upon the premises where a discharge is located or where any records must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit. B. To have access to and copy, at reasonable times and at reasonable cost, any records required to be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit. C. To inspect, at reasonable times, any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, methods, or operations regulated or required under this permit. D. To sample or monitor, at reasonable times, any substances or parameters at any location for purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act. Packet Page 804 of 895 Page 29 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 G3. PERMIT ACTIONS This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated either at the request of any interested person (including the Permittee) or upon Ecology's initiative. However, the permit may only be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for the reasons specified in 40 CFR 122.62, 40 CFR 122.64 or WAC 173-220-150 according to the procedures of 40 CFR 124.5. A. The following are causes for terminating this permit during its term, or for denying a permit renewal application: Violation of any permit term or condition. 2. Obtaining a permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose all relevant facts. 3. A material change in quantity or type of waste disposal. 4. A determination that the permitted activity endangers human health or the environment, or contributes to water quality standards violations and can only be regulated to acceptable levels by permit modification or termination. 5. A change in any condition that requires either a temporary or permanent reduction, or elimination of any discharge or sludge use or disposal practice controlled by the permit. 6. Nonpayment of fees assessed pursuant to RCW 90.48.465. 7. Failure or refusal of the Permittee to allow entry as required in RCW 90.48.090. B. The following are causes for modification but not revocation and reissuance except when the Permittee requests or agrees: A material change in the condition of the waters of the state. 2. New information not available at the time of permit issuance that would have justified the application of different permit conditions. 3. Material and substantial alterations or additions to the permitted facility or activities which occurred after this permit issuance. 4. Promulgation of new or amended standards or regulations having a direct bearing upon permit conditions, or requiring permit revision. 5. The Permittee has requested a modification based on other rationale meeting the criteria of 40 CFR Part 122.62. Packet Page 805 of 895 Page 30 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 6. Ecology has determined that good cause exists for modification of a compliance schedule, and the modification will not violate statutory deadlines. 7. Incorporation of an approved local pretreatment program into a municipality's permit. C. The following are causes for modification or alternatively revocation and reissuance: When cause exists for termination for reasons listed in Al through A7 of this section, and Ecology determines that modification or revocation and reissuance is appropriate. 2. When Ecology has received notification of a proposed transfer of the permit. A permit may also be modified to reflect a transfer after the effective date of an automatic transfer (General Condition G8) but will not be revoked and reissued after the effective date of the transfer except upon the request of the new Permittee. G4. REPORTING PLANNED CHANGES The Permittee must, as soon as possible, but no later than sixty (60) days prior to the proposed changes, give notice to Ecology of planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility, production increases, or process modification which will result in: 1) the permitted facility being determined to be a new source pursuant to 40 CFR 122.29(b); 2) a significant change in the nature or an increase in quantity of pollutants discharged; or 3) a significant change in the Permittee's sludge use or disposal practices. Following such notice, and the submittal of a new application or supplement to the existing application, along with required engineering plans and reports, this permit may be modified, or revoked and reissued pursuant to 40 CFR 122.62(a) to specify and limit any pollutants not previously limited. Until such modification is effective, any new or increased discharge in excess of permit limits or not specifically authorized by this permit constitutes a violation. G5. PLAN REVIEW REQUIRED Prior to constructing or modifying any wastewater control facilities, an engineering report and detailed plans and specifications must be submitted to Ecology for approval in accordance with Chapter 173-240 WAC. Engineering reports, plans, and specifications must be submitted at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the planned start of construction unless a shorter time is approved by Ecology. Facilities must be constructed and operated in accordance with the approved plans. G6. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND STATUTES Nothing in this permit must be construed as excusing the Permittee from compliance with any applicable federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations. Packet Page 806 of 895 Page 31 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 G7. TRANSFER OF THIS PERMIT In the event of any change in control or ownership of facilities from which the authorized discharge emanate, the Permittee must notify the succeeding owner or controller of the existence of this permit by letter, a copy of which must be forwarded to Ecology. A. Transfers by Modification Except as provided in paragraph (B), below, this permit may be transferred by the Permittee to a new owner or operator only if this permit has been modified or revoked and reissued under 40 CFR 122.62(b)(2), or a minor modification made under 40 CFR 122.63(d), to identify the new Permittee and incorporate such other requirements as may be necessary under the Clean Water Act. B. Automatic Transfers This permit may be automatically transferred to a new Permittee i£ The Permittee notifies Ecology at least thirty (30) days in advance of the proposed transfer date. 2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new Permittees containing a specific date transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them. 3. Ecology does not notify the existing Permittee and the proposed new Permittee of its intent to modify or revoke and reissue this permit. A modification under this subparagraph may also be minor modification under 40 CFR 122.63. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the written agreement. G8. REDUCED PRODUCTION FOR COMPLIANCE The Permittee, in order to maintain compliance with its permit, must control production and/or all discharges upon reduction, loss, failure, or bypass of the treatment facility until the facility is restored or an alternative method of treatment is provided. This requirement applies in the situation where, among other things, the primary source of power of the treatment facility is reduced, lost, or fails. G9. REMOVED SUBSTANCES Collected screenings, grit, solids, sludges, filter backwash, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or control of wastewaters must not be resuspended or reintroduced to the final effluent stream for discharge to state waters. Packet Page 807 of 895 Page 32 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 G10. DUTY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION The Permittee must submit to Ecology, within a reasonable time, all information which Ecology may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The Permittee must also submit to Ecology upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit. G11. OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR All other requirements of 40 CFR 122.41 and 122.42 are incorporated in this permit by reference. G12. ADDITIONAL MONITORING Ecology may establish specific monitoring requirements in addition to those contained in this permit by administrative order or permit modification. G13. PAYMENT OF FEES The Permittee must submit payment of fees associated with this permit as assessed by Ecology. G14. PENALTIES FOR VIOLATING PERMIT CONDITIONS Any person who is found guilty of willfully violating the terms and conditions of this permit is deemed guilty of a crime, and upon conviction thereof must be punished by a fine of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) and costs of prosecution, or by imprisonment in the discretion of the court. Each day upon which a willful violation occurs may be deemed a separate and additional violation. Any person who violates the terms and conditions of a waste discharge permit will incur, in addition to any other penalty as provided by law, a civil penalty in the amount of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for every such violation. Each and every such violation is a separate and distinct offense, and in case of a continuing violation, every day's continuance is deemed to be a separate and distinct violation. G15. UPSET Definition — "Upset" means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology -based permit effluent limits because of factors beyond the reasonable control of the Permittee. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. Packet Page 808 of 895 Page 33 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology -based permit effluent limits if the requirements of the following paragraph are met. A Permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset must demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: 1) an upset occurred and that the Permittee can identify the cause(s) of the upset; 2) the permitted facility was being properly operated at the time of the upset; 3) the Permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Condition S3.E; and 4) the Permittee complied with any remedial measures required under S4.0 of this permit. In any enforcement action the Permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof. G16. PROPERTY RIGHTS This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege. G17. DUTY TO COMPLY The Permittee must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or denial of a permit renewal application. G18. TOXIC POLLUTANTS The Permittee must comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under Section 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish those standards or prohibitions, even if this permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement. G19. PENALTIES FOR TAMPERING The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this permit must, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than two (2) years per violation, or by both. If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this condition, punishment must be a fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than four (4) years, or by both. G20. COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule of this permit must be submitted no later than fourteen (14) days following each schedule date. Packet Page 809 of 895 Page 34 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 G21. CONTRACT REVIEW The Permittee must submit to Ecology any proposed contract for the operation of any wastewater treatment facility covered by this permit. The review is to ensure consistency with Chapters 90.46 and 90.48 RCW. In the event that Ecology does not comment within a thirty (30)-day period, the Permittee may assume consistency and proceed with the contract. Packet Page 810 of 895 Page 35 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 APPENDIX A EFFLUENT CHARACTERIZATION FOR POLLUTANTS THIS LIST INCLUDES EPA -REQUIRED POLLUTANTS (PRIORITY POLLUTANTS) AND SOME ECOLOGY PRIORITY TOXIC CHEMICALS (PBTs) The following table, with analytical levels, is to be used as guidance for effluent characterization in NPDES permit applications and applications for permit renewal. The permit applications will specify the groups of compounds to be analyzed. Ecology may require additional groups to be analyzed. The table should also be used as a guide for routine effluent monitoring for pollutants specified in the permit. The objectives are to reduce the number of analytical "non -detects" in applications and monitoring reports and to measure effluent concentrations near or below criteria values where possible at a reasonable cost. If an applicant or Permittee knows that an alternate, less sensitive method (higher DL and QL) from 40 CFR Part 136 is sufficient to produce measurable results in their effluent, that method may be used for analysis. EPA 307(A) REF. # Pollutant & CAS No. (if available) Recommended Analytical Protocol Detection (DL)1 pg/L unless specified Quantitation Level (QL) 2 µglL unless specified Lowest Criteria Values µg/L unless s eci led Conventionals Biochemical Oxygen Demand SM5210-B 2 m /L Chemical Oxygen Demand SM5220-D 10 m /L Total Organic Carbon SM5310-B/C/D 1 m /L Total Suspended Solids SM2540-D 5 m /L Total Ammonia (as N) SM4500-NH3- GH 0.3 m /L Flow Calibrated device Dissolved oxygen 4500-OC/OG 0.2 m /L Temperature (max. 7-day avg.) Analog recorder or use micro -recording devices known as thermistors 0.20 C H SM4500-H+B N/A N/A Nonconventionals Total Alkalinity SM2320-B 5 m /L as CaCo3 Bromide (24959-67-9) 4110 B 100 400 Chlorine, Total Residual 4500 Cl G 50.0 7.5 Color SM2120 B/C/E 10 color unit Fecal Coliform SM 9221E N/A N/A Fluoride (16984-48-8) SM4500-F E 25 100 Nitrate -Nitrite as N 4500-NO3-E/F/H 100 10,000 Nitrogen, Total K'eldahl as N 4500-NH3-C/E/FG 300 Ortho-Phosphate PO4 as P 4500- PE/PF 30 100 Phosphorus, Total as P 4500-PE/PF 30 100 Oil and Grease (HEM) 1664A 5,000 Radioactivity Table lE Salinity SM2520-B 3 PSS Settleable Solids SM2540 -F 100 Sulfate (as m /L SO4) SM4110-13 200 Sulfide as m L S 4500-S2F/D/E/G 200 2.0 Sulfite as m /L S03 SM4500-S0313 2000 Packet Page 811 of 895 Page 36 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 EPA 307(A) REF. # Pollutant & CAS No. (if available) Recommended Analytical Protocol Detection (DL)1 ug/L unless specified Quantitation Level (QL)2 pg/L unless specified Lowest Criteria Values uglL unless specified Surfactants SM5540 C 50 Total dissolved solids SM2540 C 20 m 500 m /L12 Total Hardness 2340B 200 as CaCO3 Aluminum, Total 7429-90-5 200.8 2.0 10 750 Barium Total 7440-39-3 200.8 0.5 2.0 Boron Total 7440-42-8) 200.8 2.0 10.0 Cobalt, Total 7440-48-4 200.8 0.05 0.25 Iron, Total 7439-89-6 200.8 12.5 50 300 Magnesium, Total 7439-95-4 200.8 10 50 Molybdenum, Total 7439-98-7 200.8 0.1 0.5 Manganese, Total 7439-96-5 200.8 0.1 0.5 50 Tin, Total 7440-31-5 200.8 0.3 1.5 Titanium, Total 7440-32-6 200.8 1 0.5 1 2.5 Metals, C anide & Total Phenols 114 Antimony, Total 7440-36-0 200.8 0.3 1.0 145 115 Arsenic, Total 7440-38-2 200.8 0.1 0.5 367 117 Beryllium, Total 7440-41-7 200.8 0.1 0.5 48 118 Cadmium, Total 7440-43-9 200.8 0.05 0.25 0.373 Chromium hex dissolved 185-402-99 SM3500-Cr EC 0.3 1.2 107 119 Chromium, Total 7440-47-3 200.8 0.2 1.0 57.23 120 Copper, Total 7440-50-8 200.8 0.4 2.0 3.13 122 Lead, Total (7439-92-1) 200.8 0.1 0.5 0.543 123 Mercury, Total (7439-97-6) 1631E 0.0002 0.0005 0.0127 124 Nickel, Total 7440-02-0 200.8 0.1 0.5 8.23 125 Selenium, Total 7782-49-2 200.8 1.0 1.0 57 126 Silver, Total 7440-22-4 200.8 0.04 0.2 0.323 127 Thallium, Total 7440-28-0 200.8 0.09 0.36 1.75 128 Zinc, Total 7440-66-6 200.8 0.5 2.5 32.33 121 Cyanide, Total 7440-66-6 335.4 5 10 1.07 Cyanide, Available SM4500-CN G 5 10 065 Phenols, Total EPA 420.1 1 1 50 1 210005 Dioxin 129 2,3,7,8-Tetra-Chlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin 1613B 1.3 pg/L 5 pg/L 0.000000013 176-40-16 Volatile Compounds 002 Acrolein (107-02-8) 624 5 10 320/7805 003 Ac lonitrile (107-13-1) 624 1.0 2.0 0.059/0.665 004 Benzene 71-43-2 624 1.0 2.0 5.0' 018 Bis 2-Chloroeth 1 ether 111-44-4 611/625 1.0 2.0 0.0315 042 Bis 2-Chloroiso ro 1 ether 108-60-1 611/625 1.0 2.0 14005 047 Bromoform 75-25-2 624 1.0 2.0 4.35 006 Carbon tetrachloride (108-90-7) 624/601 or SM6230B 1.0 2.0 0.25 007 Chlorobenzene (108-90-7) 624 1.0 2.0 6805 016 Chloroethane 75-00-3 624/601 1.0 2.0 Packet Page 812 of 895 Page 37 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 EPA 307(A) REF. # Pollutant & CAS No. (if available) Recommended Analytical Protocol Detection (DL)1 ug/L unless specified Quantitation Level (QL)2 pg/L unless specified Lowest Criteria Values uglL unless specified 019 2-Chloroeth lvin 1 Ether 110-75-8 624 1.0 2.0 354010 023 Chloroform 67-66-3 624 or SM6210B 1.0 2.0 5.75 051 Dibromochloromethane (124-48-1) 624 1.0 2.0 0.415 025 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 624 1.9 7.6 27005 026 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 624 1.9 7.6 4005 027 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7) 624 4.4 17.6 4005 028 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 605/625 0.5 1.0 048 Dichlorobromomethane 75-27-4 624 1.0 2.0 0.275 013 1, 1 -Dichloroethane 75-34-3 624 1.0 2.0 010 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 624 1.0 2.0 0.385 029 1,1-Dichloroeth lene 75-35-4 624 1.0 2.0 0.0575 032 1,2-Dichloro ro ane 78-87-5 624 1.0 2.0 311 033 1,3-dichloropropylene (mixed isomers) 542-75-6 624 1.0 2.0 10 038 Eth lbenzene 100-41-4 624 1.0 2.0 31005 046 Methyl bromide (74-83-9) Bromomethane 624/601 5.0 10.0 48 045 Methyl chloride (74-87-3) Chloromethane 624 1.0 2.0 270000 044 Methylene chloride 75-09-2 624 5.0 10.0 4.75 015 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 624 1.9 2.0 0.175 085 Tetrachloroeth lene (127-18-4) 624 1.0 2.0 0.805 086 Toulene 108-88-3 624 1.0 2.0 68005 030 1,2-Trans-Dichloroethylene 156-60-5 (Ethylene dichloride 624 1.0 2.0 700 Oil 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 624 1.0 2.0 200' 014 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 624 1.0 2.0 0.65 087 Trichloroeth lene 79-01-6 624 1.0 2.0 2.75 088 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4) 624/SM6200B 1.0 2.0 25 Acid Com ounds 024 2-Chloro henol 95-57-8 625 1.0 2.0 814 031 2,4-Dichloro henol 120-83-2 625 0.5 1.0 935 034 2,4-Dimeth 1 henol 105-67-9 625 0.5 1.0 3804 060 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol (534-52-1) 2-meth 1-4,6,-dinitro henol 625/1625B 1.0 2.0 13.4 059 2,4 dinitro henol 51-28-5 625 1.0 2.0 705 057 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 625 0.5 1.0 45014 058 4-nitrophenol 100-02-7 625 0.5 1.0 60013 022 Parachlorometa cresol (59-50-7) 4-Chloro-3-meth 1 henol 625 1.0 2.0 - 064 Pentachloro henol 87-86-5 625 0.5 1.010 0.285 065 Phenol 108-95-2 625 2.0 4.0 210005 021 1 2,4,6-Trichloro henol 88-06-2 625 1 2.0 1 4.0 1 2.15 Base/Neutral Com ounds 001 Acena hthene 83-32-9 625 0.2 0.4 670' 077 Acena ht lene 208-96-8 625 0.3 0.6 1320009 Packet Page 813 of 895 Page 38 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 EPA 307(A) REF. # Pollutant & CAS No. (if available) Recommended Analytical Protocol Detection (DL)1 ug/L unless specified Quantitation Level (QL)2 pg/L unless specified Lowest Criteria Values uglL unless specified 078 Anthracene 120-12-7 625 0.3 0.6 96005 005 Benzidine 92-87-5 625 12 24 0.00012' 067 Benzyl butyl phthalate 85-68-7 625 0.3 0.6 1500 072 Benzo a anthracene 56-55-3 625 0.3 0.6 0.00285 PBT Benzo ' fluoranthene 205-82-3 625 0.5 1.0 - PBT Benzo(r,s,t)penta hene (189-55-9) 625 0.5 1.0 073 Benzo a rene 50-32-8 610/625 0.5 1.0 0.0028/0.0315 074 3,4-benzofluoranthene Benzo b fluoranthene 205-99-2 610/625 0.8 1.6 075 11,12-benzofluoranthene (Benzo k fluoranthene) (207-08-9) 610/625 0.8 1.6 0.0028/0.0315 079 Benzo hi Pe lene 191-24-2 610/625 0.5 1.0 0.19 043 Bis 2-chloroethox methane 111-91-1 625 5.3 21.2 920009 018 Bis 2-chloroeth ether 111-44-4 611/625 0.3 1.0 0.0315 042 Bis 2-chloroiso ro ether (108-60-1) 625 0.3 0.6 14005 066 Bis(2-eth lhex hthalate (117-81-7) 625 0.1 0.5 1.85 070 Butyl benzyl phthalate 117-81-7 625 0.25 0.6 1500 041 4-Bromo hen 1 phenyl ether 101-55-3 625 0.2 0.4 18010 020 2-Chlorona hthalene 91-58-7 625 0.3 0.6 10006 040 4-Chloro hen 1 phenyl ether 7005-72-3 625 0.3 0.5 3659 076 Chrysene 218-01-9 610/625 0.3 0.6 0.00285 PBT Dibenzo a,' acridine 224-42-0 610MI625M 2.5 10.0 - PBT Dibenzo a,h acridine 226-36-8 610MI625M 2.5 10.0 - 082 Dibenzo(a-h)anthracene (53-70-3) (1,2,5,6-dibenzanthracene) 625 0.8 1.6 27005 PBT Dibenzo a,e ene 192-65-4 610MJ625M 2.5 10.0 - PBT Dibenzo a,h rene 189-64-0 625M 2.5 10.0 028 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91-94-1 605/625 0.5 1.0 0.045 070 Diethyl phthalate 84-66-2 625 1.9 7.6 230005 071 Dimeth 1 phthalate (131-11-3) 625 1.6 6.4 3130005 068 Di-n-butyl phthalate 84-74-2 625 0.5 1.0 27005 035 2,4-dinitrotoluene 121-14-2 609 0.2 0.4 0.115 036 2,6-dinitrotoluene 606-20-2 609/625 0.2 0.4 625013 069 Di-n-octyl phthalate 117-84-0 625 0.3 0.6 3.113 037 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (as Azobenzene) 122-66-7 1625B 5.0 20 0.045 039 Fluoranthene 206-44-0 625 0.3 0.6 3005 080 Fluorene 86-73-7 625 0.3 0.6 13005 009 Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 612/625 0.3 0.6 0.00075' 052 Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 625 0.5 1.0 0.445 053 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (77-47-4 1625B/625 0.5 1.0 2405 012 Hexachloroethane (67-72-1) 625 0.5 1.0 1.95 083 Indeno 1,2,3-c P ene 193-39-5 610/625 0.5 1.0 0.00286 054 Iso horone 78-59-1 625 0.5 1.0 8.45 Packet Page 814 of 895 Page 39 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 EPA 307(A) REF. # Pollutant & CAS No. (if available) Recommended Analytical Protocol Detection (DL)1 ug/L unless specified Quantitation Level (QL)2 pg/L unless specified Lowest Criteria Values uglL unless specified PBT 3-Methyl cholanthrene 56-49-5 625 2.0 8.0 055 Naphthalene 91-20-3 625 0.3 0.6 40011 056 Nitrobenzene (98-95-3) 625 0.5 1.0 175 061 N-Nitrosodimeth lamine 62-75-9 607/625 2.0 4.0 0.000695 063 N-Nitrosodi-n- ro lamine 621-64-7 607/625 0.5 1.0 0.0055 062 N-Nitrosodi hen lamine (86-30-6) 625 0.5 1.0 55 PBT Pe lene 198-55-0 625 1.9 7.6 081 Phenanthrene 85-01-8 625 0.3 0.6 411 084 P rene 129-00-0 625 0.3 0.6 9605 008 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 625 0.3 1 0.6 35" Pesticides/PCBs 089 Aldrin 309-00-2 608 0.025 0.05 0.00013' 102 al ha-BHC 319-84-6 608 0.025 0.05 0.00395 103 beta-BHC 319-85-7 608 0.025 0.05 0.0145 104gamma-BHC 58-89-9 608 0.025 0.05 0.0195 105 delta-BHC 319-86-8 608 0.025 0.05 7 013 091 Chlordane (57-74-9) 608 0.025 0.05 0.000575 092 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3) 608 0.025 0.05 0.00059' 093 4,4'-DDE 72-55-9 608 0.025 0.0510 0.00059' 094 4,4' DDD 72-54-8 608 0.025 0.05 0.000835 090 Dieldrin 60-57-1 608 0.025 0.05 0.000145 095 al ha-Endosulfan (959-98-8) 608 0.025 0.05 0.00875 096 beta-Endosulfan 33213-65-9) 608 0.025 0.05 0.00875 097 Endosulfan Sulfate 1031-07-8 608 0.025 0.05 0.0935 098 Endrin 72-20-8 608 0.025 0.05 0.0023' 099 Endrin Aldehyde 7421-93-4 608 0.025 0.05 0.765 100 Heptachlor 76-44-8 608 0.025 0.05 0.000215 101 Heptachlor Epoxide 1024-57-3) 608 0.025 0.05 0.000105 106 PCB-1242 53469-21-9 608 0.25 0.5 0.0001705 107 PCB-1254 11097-69-1 608 0.25 0.5 0.0001705 108 PCB-1221 11104-28-2 608 0.25 0.5 0.0001705 109 PCB-1232 11141-16-5 608 0.25 0.5 0.0001705 110 PCB-1248 12672-29-6 608 0.025 0.5 0.0001705 111 PCB-1260 11096-82-5 608 0.13 0.5 10.513 112 PCB-1016 12674-11-2 608 0.13 0.5 0.42" 113 1 Toxa hene 8001-35-2 608 1 0.24 1 0.5 1 0.00073' PBT - Denotes a state of Washington priority pollutant. 1. Detection level (DL) or detection limit means the minimum concentration of an analyte (substance) that can be measured and reported with a 99% confidence that the analyte concentration is greater than zero as determined by the procedure given in 40 CFR Part 136, Appendix B. 2. Quantitation Level (QL) is equivalent to EPA's Minimum Level (ML) which is defined in 40 CFR Part 136 as the minimum level at which the entire GUMS system must give recognizable mass spectra (background corrected) and acceptable calibration points. These levels were published as proposed in the Federal Register on March 28, 1997. Packet Page 815 of 895 Page 40 of 40 Permit No. WA0024058 Modification Date: May 9, 2012 3. This criterion is dependent upon receiving water characteristics. This value is the aquatic life chronic value at a hardness of 25 mg/l. 4. EPA 822-R-03 -03 1. 5. Human health criteria as fresh or marine — EPA National Toxic Rule. 6. Fresh water aquatic life as Acute or Chronic — EPA recommended values. 7. Aquatic life as Acute or Chronic — WAC 173-201A. 8. USEPA Drinking Water Criteria. 9. No human health -based screening levels were available for 2-chloroethylvinyl ether. This value is the surface water screening values derived by U.S. EPA Region 4 Water Management Division. These values were obtained from Water Quality Criteria documents and represent the chronic ambient water quality criteria values for the protection of aquatic life. 10. USGS 2004-5194. Pesticides Detected in Urban Streams in King County, Washington, 1998-2003. 11. Estimated effect level. 12. Chapter WAC 173-200. 13. Estimated effect level. Packet Page 816 of 895 CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES June 26, 2013 Chair Reed called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 — 5th Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT John Reed, Chair Valerie Stewart, Vice Chair Todd Cloutier Ian Duncan Bill Ellis Philip Lovell Neil Tibbott BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Kevin Clarke (excused) READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES STAFF PRESENT Rob Chave, Development Services Director Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Mike Delilla, Utilities Engineer Ren6e McRae, Recreation Manager Karin Noyes, Recorder BOARD MEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF JUNE 12, 2013 BE APPROVED AS AMENDED. BOARD MEMBER CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS No one in the audience indicated a desire to address the Board during this portion of the meeting. PUBLIC HEARING ON 2013 SANITARY SEWER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (FILE NUMBER AMD20130006) Mr. Delilla said he was present to present the Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update and solicit feedback from both the Board and the public in preparation for a public hearing before the City Council. He explained that the Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan is an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. It guides the operation of the City's Sewer Utility by identifying and proposing solutions to known conveyance, maintenance and other problems; detailing the actions necessary to ensure compliance with applicable Federal State and local requirements; and presenting an operation and maintenance plan, capital improvement plan, and financial plan. Mr. Delilla explained that because Edmonds is primarily a built -out City, most of the identified Sanitary Sewer issues are a result of aging infrastructure, current size of infrastructure in relation to current and future population, root intrusion, and infiltration and inflow. He noted that most of the pipes date back to the 1950's and before, with some as old as the 1920s. Packet Page 817 of 895 He advised that the Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2006. The purpose of the update is to reprioritize capital projects, reflect the actual changes in population growth that have occurred, accommodate future population growth projections based on data from the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) and the Planning Department, incorporate the wastewater treatment plant plan, and improve record tracing methods. Mr. Delilla pointed out that in addition to treating flows from properties in Edmonds, the City's treatment plant also treats effluent from the Ronald Wastewater District, the Olympic View Sewer District, and nearly all of the effluent from Mountlake Terrace. The City has agreements with each of these entities to pay for their respective portions of the facility. Mr. Delilla reported that since 2006, the City has significantly improved their tracking methods to identify current and potential issues in the pipe system. Every three years, the City sends a camera device into each pipe reach to record the existing conditions and provide visual data to identify potential problems. In addition, they now have the entire sanitary sewer system on a GIS Map. This enables them to tie the entire facility into real world coordinates to provide a good feel for the slope of the pipe in relationship to other pipes in the area. They also collect meter data from various locations in the City, and this allows them to bill other entities fairly for the service. Mr. Delilla advised that the City's current system has 10 flow meters, 3,200 manholes, and 679,227 miles of sanitary sewer pipe main. They have 14 lift stations and 1 wastewater treatment plant with 3 primary clarifiers, 3 aeration basins, 3 secondary clarifiers and 1 incinerator. He reviewed that the proposed plan update identifies the following capital projects: • Conveyance Projects. The goal of the plan is to provide a basic or essential level of service for the sanitary sewer utility. The City is currently working to complete citywide pipe replacement and restoration projects to correct issues related to excessive root intrusion, conveyance problems and old/damaged pipes. • Wastewater Treatment Plant. The plan calls for replacement of the emergency power switchgear system, which is used in the event of a power failure. The plan also identifies changes that are necessary to ensure the incinerator meets the regulatory requirements and recoating the clarifiers. Mr. Delilla advised that 100% of the Sanitary Sewer Utility is rate funded. Fees collected for the utility have been used for an increased number of items. Projects are driven by aging infrastructure that requires more maintenance as time goes by and as population and development increases. Any utility rate adjustment would require approval by the Edmonds City Council. Board Member Lovell asked if the update takes into account potential development that might occur on Highway 99, the hospital district, Harbor Square and the waterfront to ensure there is adequate capacity within the existing piping system. Mr. Delilla answered that the update incorporates the population growth data provided by the PSRC. In addition, he met with the Planning Manager to coordinate where the growth is anticipated to occur. A growth model was prepared, assigning an effluent factor to each of the areas where population is expected to grow significantly. The proposed plan addresses future capacity up to the years 2019, 2033 and ultimate build out of the City. Board Member Lovell asked if the proposed plan would provide sufficient capacity to accommodate a substantial amount of multi -family development in any of the areas mentioned above. Mr. Delilla answered affirmatively and noted that the treatment plant is currently under capacity. Board Member Lovell referred to the two cost studies that were done for treatment and conveyance and maintenance and operations. He said it appears that the treatment and conveyance costs could be covered by increased rates, but the total package would require some subsidy. Mr. Delilla answered that the intent is for all costs associated with the Sanitary Sewer Utility to be funded by rate payers, and increases may be required. At this time, the City pays for about 50% of the costs of maintenance and operation, and the other entities share the remaining costs. Board Member Lovell observed that the plan does not appear to implement any infrastructure that would allow the City to reclaim and reuse the treated water. Mr. Delilla said he does not anticipate the City will implement a reclamation program within the six -year timeframe of the proposed plan. He pointed out that there are stringent regulatory requirements associated with reclaimed water. In addition, the treatment plant is site constrained and there is little room for the added infrastructure. He summarized that a study would be necessary to determine the feasibility of water reclamation, and this goes beyond the scope of the current update. Vice Chair Stewart said she is aware of a model program that has been implemented in both Portland and IslandWood where a trademark system has been developed for reclaiming water. She suggested that perhaps this same type of system could be implemented at Harbor Square. Planning Board Minutes June 26, 2013 Page 2 Packet Page 818 of 895 Vice Chair Stewart observed that there is a worldwide trend to use alternative materials to get away from Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) because of the environmental impacts that occur in the production of PVC. She said she hopes the City will consider using an alternative material. She noted that several studies have been done on the various types of materials, and she agreed to forward the information she collected to staff. She said it does not appear that Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) would cost significantly more than PVC, and it is more environmentally friendly. Board Member Ellis said it appears from the report that all of the treated water is currently discharged into Puget Sound. He asked if it would be possible for this water to be utilized for secondary uses. Mr. Delilla agreed that would be possible, but it would require a second level of infrastructure for storage and conveyance and space at the current treatment plan for additional infrastructure is limited. Board Member Ellis pointed out the water reclamation would also be seasonal in Edmonds. Board Member Lovell asked how the projects in the Capital Improvement Plan were prioritized. Mr. Delilla answered that cameras are placed inside the pipes to ascertain their condition and identify potential problems in each of the pipes. Each problem is given a score, and the projects with the worst scores are given a higher priority in the Capital Improvement Plan. He said that projects that address conveyance problems are typically given priority. Board Member Lovell commented on the good plan prepared by staff and said it is great to see a plan that can actually be funded and implemented. Chair Reed pointed out that the draft plan provided in the Staff Report did not include Section 10 (Operations and Maintenance Program) and Section I I(Wastewater Treatment Facility Financial Plan). However, Mr. Delilla did provide a summary of each of the sections, and the actual documents will be included in the draft plan that is presented to the City Council for approval. Vice Chair Stewart asked which pipes typically require the most repair and maintenance. Mr. Delilla said root intrusion is a serious problem and is more difficult to address. Many of the pipes are old, and people have planted trees on top or nearby. As the tree roots grow, they often find their way into the pipes, eventually blocking the flow. There are also areas in the City where soils are poor and can expand and contract based on moisture. This can complicate the construction and reconstruction of the pipe, as well. Vice Chair Stewart asked if broken pipes are removed and recycled. Mr. Delilla answered that the majority of the City's pipes are concrete, which is recyclable. Again, he summarized that the current conveyance system is old, and the City is working to address the problems and be more proactive in the future. No one in the audience indicated a desire to participate in the public hearing, and the hearing was closed. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE 2013 SANITARY SEWER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE (FILE NUMBER AMD20130006) TO THE CITY COUNCIL WITH A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. VICE CHAIR STEWART SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED REZONE OF PARCELS LOCATED AT 403 AND 405 — 3RD AVENUE NORTH (FILE NUMBER PLN20130030) Chair Reed reminded the Board that the rezone application is a quasi-judicial matter. He invited Board Members to disclose any communications that might have had regarding the subject of the hearing outside of the hearing. None of the Board Members indicated an ex parte communication. Mr. Clugston advised that a site -specific rezone is a Type IV-B application. Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Board, and the Planning Board conducts a public hearing and forwards a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council holds a closed -record review of the project and makes the final decision. After conducting a public hearing and reviewing the Staff Report, the Board can vote to adopt the findings in the Staff Report or modify the findings as appropriate. Planning Board Minutes June 26, 2013 Page 3 Packet Page 819 of 895 AM-6112 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: 30 Minutes Submitted For: Councilmembers Bloom and Peterson Department: City Council Committee. - Submitted By: Type: Information Subject Title Continued discussion regarding Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics. Recommendation Previous Council Action Jana Spellman Information 2012 Council Retreat: Council made this subject a priority for 2012 (minutes attached) 11. April 10, 2012 Public Safety and Personal Committee: This agenda items was discussed (minutes attached). 2013 Council Retreat: This item was discussed (minutes attached). March 12, 2013 Public Safety and Personnel Committee: This item was discussed (minutes attached). July 9, 2013 PS/P Committee: This item was discussed (minutes attached). July 30, 2013 Council Meeting: This item was put on the August 20, 2013 Council Agenda. See excerpt from July 30, 2013 minutes below: "DISCUSSION REGARDING CODE OF ETHICS This item was moved to the August 20, 2013 Council meeting via action taken under Agenda Item 2." August 20, 2013 Council Meeting: Council President Petso suggested due to the late hour and remaining items on the agenda items that this item be postponed to a future meeting. August 27, 2013 Council Meeting: This item was discussed (minutes attached). September 10, 2013 Public Safety/Personnel Committee Meeting: This item was discussed (minutes attached). Narrative Packet Page 820 of 895 Discussions regarding the formation of a Code of Conduct and Ethics policy have occurred in the Public Safety/Personnel Committee and at full Council meetings in 2012 and 2013. This item was discussed at the 9/10/2013 Public Safety and Personnel Committee. It has been placed on this agenda for continued discussion by the full Council. Attachment 1: February 3, 2011 City Council Retreat Minutes Attachment 2: April 10, 2012 Public Safety/Personnel Committee Minutes Attachment 3: Excerpt from 2012 Final Edmonds Personnel Policies Attachment 4: Ord 3689 Conflict of Interest Attachment 5: Excerpt from 2013 Council Retreat Minutes Attachment 6: March 12, 2013 Public Safety/ Personnel Committee Minutes Attachment 7: July 9, 2013 Public Safety/ Personnel Committee Minutes Attachment 8: Kirkland Code of Conduct Attachment 9: Bellevue Code of Ethics Attachment 10: Bainbridge Island - Ethics Requirements for Advisory Commissions and Committees Attachment 11: City of Kirkland Chapter 3.14 Code of Ethics Attachment 12: August 27, 2013 Council Meeting Minutes Attachment 13: Snohomish County Expectations and Code of Conduct Attachment 14: September 10, 2013 Public Safety/Personnel Committee Minutes Attachments Attach 1: 2012 Council Retreat Minutes Attach 2 April-10-12 Minutes Public Safety, Personnel Committee Attach 3 - Exerpt from 2012 FINAL Edmonds Personnel Policies Attach 4 - Ord 3689 Conflict of Interest Attach 5: Excerpt from 2013 Council Retreat Minutes Attach 6: Minutes 3/12/13 PS/P Committee Attach 7: Minutes 7/9/13 PS/P Committee Attach 8: Kirkland Code of Conduct Attach 9: Bellevue Code of Ethics Attach 10: Bainbridge Island - Ethics Requirements for Advisory Commissions and Committees Attach 11: CITY OF KIRKLAND Chapter 3.14 CODE OF ETHICS Attach 12 - 8/27/13 DRAFT Council Minutes Attach 13: Sno County Expectations and Code of Conduct Attach 14: 9/10/13 Public Safety/Personnel Committee Minutes Inbox Reviewed By City Clerk Sandy Chase Mayor Dave Earling Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase Form Started By: Jana Spellman Final Approval Date: 09/12/2013 Form Review Date 09/12/2013 01:41 PM 09/12/2013 04:35 PM 09/12/2013 04:57 PM Started On: 09/12/2013 10:25 AM Packet Page 821 of 895 before the Council is first a committee meeting or work session. Issues that have a financial impact will be discussed at a work session rather than just by the Finance Committee. It was the consensus of the Council to change the name of the Community Services/Development Services Committee to the Public Works, Parks and Planning Committees. • Mission Statements Committees will determine whether to develop a mission statement. Councilmembers Buckshnis and Yamamoto will develop a mission statement for the Finance Committee. • Clarify the Public Safety/Human Resources Committee It was the consensus of the Council to change the name of the Public Safety/Human Resources to Committee to the Public Safety and Personnel Committee. • Community Outreach, Tree Board Council President Peterson explained there has been a proposal to restart the Community Outreach Committee. Councilmember Plunkett recalled the Community Outreach Committee was discontinued after 3 years; no new methods of communicating were identified. Mayor Earling commented on the potential for an electronic newsletter. Discussion followed regarding whether to form a code rewrite committee so that the code rewrite is Council and citizen driven, technical expertise required for the code rewrite, having staff make periodic presentations at Council work sessions regarding the rewrite, the proposal by staff to restructure the code, providing opportunity for citizen comment but having professionals assemble the changes, citizen knowledge that could benefit the process, concern with citizens participating for their own benefit or at least that perception, proposal to have user groups test the model, ability for any citizen to identify code conflicts regardless of whether there is a committee structure, and asking staff whether forming a committee in the future could be helpful. The Council agreed to seek feedback from Planning Manager Rob Chave and Building Official Leonard Yarberry regarding forming a code rewrite committee and schedule further discussion on a work session agenda. Council President Peterson suggested enhancing the Council portion of the website with more updates, etc. and working with the Mayor on an electronic newsletter and then consider whether a Community Outreach Committee is needed. It was the consensus of the Council to add a Council liaison to the Tree Board and to make it a paid committee position. 0 Ethics Council President Peterson recalled there has been discussion about developing a code of ethics for Councilmembers. Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas, Bloom and Petso offered to serve on an ad hoc committee that would review other cities' codes and present a draft to the Council. • Miscellaneous Mr. Taraday explained a special meeting notice must be issued for Tuesday committee meetings that begin at 6:00 p.m. If the Council wished to continue holding committee meetings at 6:00 p.m., he suggested revising the code to reflect that start time. Edmonds City Council Retreat Draft Minutes February 2-3, 2011 Page 17 Packet Page 822 of 895 PUBLIC SAFETY/PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES April 10, 2012 Committee members present: Council Member K. Michael Plunkett Council Member Joan Bloom Others present: HR Manager Mary Ann Hardie Citizen Don Hall Council Member Plunkett called the meeting to order at 7:19 pm. DISCUSSION ON CODE OF ETHICS (RELATING TO COUNCIL MEMBERS) Council Member Michael Plunkett opened the discussion by stating it was unclear as to what action/direction should be taken at this point with regard to this as Council had not given any specific direction regarding this topic although one or some council member(s) may have wanted to discuss this further. Council Member Joan Bloom stated that she had reviewed the City of Kirkland's Code of Ethics and the Mountlake Terrace Code of Ethics and there were some concerns that she had with using a code of ethics similar to theirs. Council Member Bloom further stated that she was not aware that there was a code of ethics for Council Members. HR Manager Mary Ann Hardie affirmed this. Council Member Bloom stated that she would like to build a policy regarding a code of ethics and that this process needs to move forward. Council Member Plunkett stated that he was willing to discuss this topic since it was on the agenda, but that that he may not be interested in moving this forward [for Council consideration]. Ms. Hardie stated that she had discussed this HR Committee subject with Carrie Hite (Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director) prior to the meeting and that they both agreed that HR would likely not be the best (nor most appropriate) committee for this forum. Additionally, while HR had provided samples of codes of ethics from other cities it would seem that the City Attorney and/or the City Clerk's Office [or Council] may be more appropriate for this process. Ms. Hardie also emphasized that HR was willing to continue to provide information as needed to the committee to assist with the process, but that this was not a [specific to] HR function since it did not pertain to employee related policies. There was some discussion that followed by the committee about what the process would be to create a code of ethics policy for Council members, creating a committee for this and whether or not the HR Committee was the appropriate committee for the discussion. Council Member Plunkett emphasized his concern about the subjectivity of some of the other policies from other cities and that [while the City may not have a specific code of ethics for Council Members] there are state laws that Council Members must follow. Council Member Bloom stated that she understood Council Member Plunkett's concerns but that due to the expressed interest/concern from the citizens about the possible need for this policy, she felt it was important for: 1) The City of Edmonds to have this policy; 2) this information to be available to citizens (as well as being part of transparency of information and citizen participation); and 3) there to be continued work toward the creation of such a policy. Council Member Plunkett stated that he would like to make this information easier for citizens to access. Council Member Bloom stated that since there does not usually appear to be a large agenda for the HR Committee, that the work on this code of ethics policy could be done at this committee and that the Cities of Kirkland, Mountlake Terrace and another city may be reviewed for further policy consideration. Council Member Plunkett agreed that this could be kept on the HR Committee Meeting agenda and that further review of the policy will occur at the next meeting. Packet Page 823 of 895 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD Citizen Don Hall stated that he agreed with Council Member Plunkett that some of the code of ethics policies from other cities that he had come across did appear to be too subjective. Citizen Hall further stated that he became more interested in this topic of discussion after it was discovered that Council Members were not considered to be employees of the City and are not held to the same City Personnel Policy standards although [perhaps] they should be. This process will likely require a lot of "hands on" work and will be a difficult process. The meeting adjourned at 7:44 pm 2 Packet Page 824 of 895 CHAPTER X EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBILITIES AND CODE OF ETHICS 10.1 GENERAL CODE OF CONDUCT The City's primary function is to provide service to the citizens of Edmonds. To achieve that goal, all employees are expected to treat the public as their most valued customer. All employees are expected to serve the public in a professional manner, which is courteous, efficient and helpful. Employees must maintain a clean and neat appearance appropriate to their work assignment, as determined by their position and department head. Since the proper working relationship between employees and the City depends on each employee's on -going job performance, professional conduct and behavior, the City has established certain minimum standards of personal and professional conduct. Among the City's expectations are: tact and courtesy towards the public and fellow employees; adherence to City policies, procedures, safety rules and safe work practices; compliance with directions from supervisors; preserving and protecting the City's equipment, grounds, facilities and resources; and providing orderly and cost efficient services to its citizens. In addition, all persons representing the City of Edmonds are expected to conduct business in the following manner: • All persons, representing the City of Edmonds, shall conduct business in a professional manner, respecting all citizens' rights, and showing courtesy to all. • Their actions shall be conducted within compliance of the laws and regulations governing the City's actions, including but not limited to RCW Title 42. • City representatives are expected to conduct business in an open manner. • They shall not engage in any conduct which would reflect unfavorably upon City government or any of the services it provides. • They must avoid any action which might result in or create the impression of using their position for private gain, giving preferential treatment or privileged information to any person, or losing impartiality in conducting the City's business. 10.2 OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Employees shall not, directly or indirectly, engage in any outside employment or financial interest which may conflict, in the City's opinion, with the best interests of the City or interfere with the employee's ability to perform his/her assigned City job. Examples include, but are not limited to, outside employment which: 53 Packet Page 825 of 895 (1) prevents the employee from being available for work beyond normal working hours, such as emergencies or peak work periods, when such availability is a regular part of the employee's job; (2) is conducted during the employee's work hours; (3) utilizes City telephones, computers, supplies, credit, or any other resources, facilities or equipment; (4) is employed with a firm which has contracts with or does business with the City; or (5) may reasonably be perceived by members of the public as a conflict of interest or otherwise discredits public service. 10.3 REPORTING IMPROPER GOVERNMENT ACTION In compliance with the Local Government Employee Whistleblower Protection Act, RCW 42.41.050, this policy is created to encourage employees to disclose any improper governmental action taken by city officials or employees without fear of retaliation. This policy also safeguards legitimate employer interests by encouraging complaints to be made first to the City, with a process provided for speedy dispute resolution. Key Definitions: Improper Governmental Action is any action by a city officer or employee that is: (1) undertaken in the performance duties, whether or not the action employment, and of the official's or employee's official is within the scope of the employee's (2) in violation of any federal, state or local law or rule, is an abuse of authority, is of substantial and specific danger to the public health or safety, or is a gross waste of public funds. (3) "improper governmental action" does not include personnel actions (hiring, firing, complaints, promotions, reassignment, for example). In addition, employees are not free to disclose matters that would affect a person's right to legally protected confidential communications. City employees who become aware of improper governmental action should follow this procedure: • Bring the matter to the attention of his/her supervisor, if non-involved, in writing, stating in detail the basis for the employee's belief that an improper action has occurred. This should be done as soon as the employee becomes aware of the improper action. 54 Packet Page 826 of 895 • Where the employee believes the improper action involves their supervisor, the employee may raise the issue directly with Human Resources, their Department Director or the Mayor. Where the employee believes the improper action involves the Mayor, the employee may raise the issue with Human Resources or the City Attorney. • The Mayor or his/her designee, as the case may be, shall promptly investigate the report of improper government action. After the investigation is completed (within thirty (30) days of the employee's report), the employee shall be advised of the results of the investigation, except that personnel actions taken as a result of the investigation may be kept confidential. An employee who fails to make a good faith effort to follow this policy shall not be entitled to the protection of this policy against retaliation, pursuant to RCW 42.41.030. In the case of an emergency, where the employee believes that damage to persons or property may result if action is not taken immediately, the employee may bypass the above procedure and report the improper action directly to the appropriate government agency responsible for investigating the improper action. For the purposes of this section, an emergency is a circumstance that if not immediately changed may cause damage to persons or property. Employees may report information about improper governmental action directly to an outside agency if the employee reasonably believes that an adequate investigation was not undertaken by the City to determine whether an improper government action occurred, or that insufficient action was taken by the City to address the improper action or that for other reasons the improper action is likely to recur. Outside agencies to which reports may be directed include: Snohomish County Prosecuting Attorney M/S 504 Everett, WA 98201 (425)388-3333 Washington State Attorney General 1125 Washington Street SE P.O. Box 40100 Olympia, WA 98504 (360)753-6200 Washington State Auditor Capital Campus P.O. Box 40021 Olympia, WA 98504 (360)902-0370 If the above -listed agencies do not appear to appropriate in light of the nature of the improper action to be reported, contact information for other state and county agencies may be obtained via the following link: http://access.wa.gov/agency/agency.aspx. It is unlawful for a local government to take retaliatory action because an employee, in good faith, provided information that improper government action occurred. Retaliatory 55 Packet Page 827 of 895 Action is any material adverse change in the terms and conditions of an employee's employment. Employees who believe they have been retaliated against for reporting an improper government action should follow this procedure: Procedure for Seeking Relief against Retaliation: (1) Employees must provide a written complaint to the supervisor within thirty (30) days of the occurrence of the alleged retaliatory action. If the supervisor is involved, the notice should go to the Mayor. If the Mayor is involved, the notice should go to the City Attorney. The written charge shall specify the alleged retaliatory action and the relief requested. (2) The Mayor or his/her designee, as the case may be, shall investigate the complaint and respond in writing within thirty (30) days of receipt of the written charge. Additional time to respond may be necessary depending on the nature and complexity of the complaint. (3) After receiving the City's response, the employee may request a hearing before a state administrative law judges (ALJ) to establish that a retaliatory action occurred and to obtain appropriate relief under the law. The request for hearing must be delivered within the earlier of either fifteen (15) days of receipt of the City's response to the charge of retaliatory action or forty-five (45) days of receipt of the charge of retaliation to the Mayor for response. (4) Within five (5) working days of receipt of a request for hearing the City shall apply to the State Office of Administrative Hearing's for an adjudicative proceeding before an administrative law judge. Office of Administrative Hearings PO Box 42488 Olympia, WA 98504-2488 360.407.2700 800.558.4857 360.664.8721 Fax (5) At the hearing, the employee must prove that a retaliatory action occurred by a preponderance of the evidence in the hearing. The ALJ will issue a final decision not later than forty-five (45) days after the date of the request for hearing, unless an extension is granted. The Mayor or designee is responsible for implementing these policies and procedures. This includes posting the policy on the City bulletin board, making the policy available to any employee upon request, and providing the policy to all newly hired employees. Officers, managers and supervisors are responsible for ensuring the procedures are fully implemented within their areas of responsibility. 56 Packet Page 828 of 895 Violations of this policy and these procedures may result in appropriate disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal. 10.4 POLITICAL ACTIVITIES City employees may participate in political or partisan activities of their choosing provided that City resources and property are not utilized, and the activity does not adversely affect the responsibilities of the employees in their positions. Employees may not campaign on City time or in a City uniform or while representing the City in any way. Employees may not allow others to use City facilities or funds for political activities without a paid rental agreement. Any City employee who meets with or may be observed by the public or otherwise represents the City to the public, while performing his/her regular duties, may not wear or display any button, badge or sticker relevant to any candidate or ballot issue during working hours. Employees shall not solicit, on City property or City time, for a contribution for a partisan political cause. Except as noted in this policy, City employees are otherwise free to fully exercise their constitutional First Amendment rights. 10.5 NO SMOKING POLICY The City maintains a smoke -free workplace. No smoking of tobacco products or electronic smoking devices is permitted anywhere in the City's buildings or vehicles, and offices or other facilities rented or leased by the City. If an employee chooses to smoke, it must be done outside at least 25 feet from entrances, exits, windows that open, and ventilation air intakes. 10.6 PERSONAL POSSESSIONS AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS The City cannot assume responsibility for any theft or damage to the personal belongings of City employees. Therefore, the City requests that employees avoid bringing valuable personal articles to work. Employees are solely responsible for ensuring that their personal belongings are secure while at work. Employees should have no expectation of privacy as to any items or information generated/stored on City systems. Employees are advised that work -related searches of an employee's work area, workspace, computer and electronic mail on the City's property may be conducted without advance notice. The City reserves the right to search employee desks, lockers and personal belongings brought onto City premises if necessary. Employees who do not consent to inspections may be subject to discipline, up to and including immediate termination. Please see Attachment A - INFORMATION SERVICES - ACCEPTABLE USE POLICY - for guidelines on use of City computers. 10.7 USE OF TELEPHONES AND CITY VEHICLES Use of City phones and City cellular phones for local personal phone calls and text messaging should be kept to a minimum; long distance personal use is prohibited. Other City equipment, including vehicles, should be used by employees for City business only, unless otherwise 57 Packet Page 829 of 895 approved by the Department Director. Employees' misuse of City services, telephones, vehicles, equipment or supplies can result in disciplinary action up to and including termination. The City reminds employees that Washington state law restricts the use of cell phones and PDA's while driving. Employees must comply with applicable laws while engaging in work for the City. 10.8 BULLETIN BOARDS Information of special interest to all employees is posted regularly on the City bulletin boards. Employees may not post any information on these bulletin boards without the authorization of the Department Head. 10.9 MEDIA RELATIONS The Mayor or designated department heads shall be responsible for all official contacts with the news media during working hours, including answering of questions from the media. The Mayor or department head may designate specific employees to give out procedural, factual or historical information on particular subjects. 10.10 USE OF SAFETY BELTS Per Washington law, anyone operating or riding in City vehicles must wear seat belts at all times. 10.11 DRIVER'S LICENSE REQUIREMENTS As part of the requirements for certain specific City positions, an employee may be required to hold a valid Washington State Driver's license and/or a Commercial Driver's License (CDL). If an employee fails his or her CDL physical examination or the license is revoked, suspended or lost, or is in any other way not current, valid, and in the employee's possession, the employee shall promptly notify his/her department head and will be immediately suspended from driving duties. The employee may not resume driving until proof of a valid, current license is provided to his/her department head. Depending on the duration of license suspension, revocation or other inability to drive, an employee may be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Failure on the part of an employee to notify their department director of the revocation, suspension, or loss of driving privileges may subject the employee to disciplinary action, up to and including termination. 10.12 SOLICITATIONS Most forms of selling and solicitations are inappropriate in the workplace. They can be an intrusion on employees and citizens and may present a risk to employee safety or to the security of City or employee property. The following limitations apply: Persons not employed by the City may not solicit, survey, petition, or distribute literature on our premises at any time. This includes persons soliciting for charities, salespersons, questionnaire surveyors, labor union organizers, or any other solicitor or distributor. Exceptions to this rule may be made in special circumstances where the City determines that an exception would serve the best interests of the organization and our employees. An example of an exception might be the United Way campaign or a similar, community -based fund raising effort. Packet Page 830 of 895 Employees may not solicit for any purpose during work time. Reasonable forms of solicitation are permitted during non -work time, such as before or after work or during meal or break periods. Soliciting employees who are on non -work time may not solicit other employees who are on work time. Employees may not distribute literature for any purpose during work time or in work areas, or through the City's electronic systems. The employee lunchroom is considered a non -work area under this policy. 10.13 USE OF CITY CREDIT Unless otherwise authorized by City policy or specifically authorized by the Mayor, no City employee is authorized to commit the City to any contractual agreement, especially an agreement that lends the City's credit in any way. Employees are prohibited from conducting personal business with companies in any way which improperly implies the employee is acting as an agent of the City. 10.14 SUBSTANCE ABUSE The City's philosophy on substance abuse has two focuses: (1) a concern for the well being of the employee and (2) a concern for the safety of other employees and members of the public. As part of our employee assistance program, we encourage employees who are concerned about their alcohol or drug use to seek counseling, treatment and rehabilitation. Although the decision to seek diagnosis and accept treatment is completely voluntary, the City is fully committed to helping employees who voluntarily seek assistance to overcome substance abuse problems. In most cases, the expense of treatment may be fully or partially covered by the City's benefit program. Please see the EAP counselor for more information. In recognition of the sensitive nature of these matters, all discussions will be kept confidential. Employers who seek advice or treatment will not be subject to retaliation or discrimination. Although the City is concerned with rehabilitation, it must be understood that disciplinary action may be taken when an employee's job performance is impaired because he/she is under the influence of drugs or alcohol on the job. The City may discipline or terminate an employee possessing, consuming, selling or using alcohol, or controlled substances (other than legally prescribed) during work hours or on City premises, including break times and meal periods. The City may also discipline or terminate an employee who reports for duty or works under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances. Employees may also not report for work when their performance is impaired by the use of prescribed or over-the-counter medications. The City reserves the right to search employee work areas, offices, desks, filing cabinets etc. to ensure compliance with this policy. Employees shall have no expectation of privacy in such areas. Any employee who is convicted of a criminal drug violation in the workplace must notify the organization in writing within five calendar days of the conviction. The organization will take appropriate action within 30 days of notification. Federal contracting agencies will be notified when appropriate. 59 Packet Page 831 of 895 Testing: Certain employees of the City, including those who must possess CDLs or who have safety sensitive positions, are subject to random drug and alcohol testing. Any employee may also be required to submit to alcohol or controlled substance testing when the City has reasonable suspicion that the employee is under the influence of controlled substances or alcohol. Refusal to submit to testing, when requested, may result in immediate disciplinary action, including termination. The City may also choose to pursue criminal charges, if violations of law are suspected. The City has adopted Drug and Alcohol Testing Policies and Procedures, which more specifically describe the City's substance abuse policy, and these are incorporated herein by reference as Appendix B. Z1 Packet Page 832 of 895 0006.90000 BFP: 5/21/08 ORDINANCE NO.3689 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 3 ECC, REVENUE AND FINANCE, TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 3.70 ECC, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, REGARDING CONTRACTS WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the city has contracted for professional services with firms that have hired former city employees; and WHEREAS, Chapters 42.20 and 42.23 RCW, which regulates conflict of interest in municipal contracting, does not specifically address dealings with former employees; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it to be in the best interest of the city to adopt regulations establishing criteria for contracting with former employees or firms that hire former employees; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A new Chapter 3.70 ECC, Conflict of Interest., is hereby adopted in Title 3 ECC, Revenue and Finance., to read as follows: Chapter 3.70 CONFLICT OF INTEREST 3.70.000 Definitions. 3.70.010 Restrictions on future employment of city employees. 3.70.020 Disclosure of Privileged, Confidential, or Proprietary Information. {SFP696127.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 1 - Packet Page 833 of 895 3.70.030 Exemption. 3.70.040 Penalties. 3.70.000 Definitions. The definition of words used in Chapter 3.70 ECC shall be consistent with the definitions, context and usage of the terms in Chapter 42.23 RCW, and their interpretation by Washington Courts. 3.70.010 Restrictions on future employment of city employees. No former city official, officer or employee may, within a period of one year from the date of termination or city employment, accept employment or receive compensation from an employer if: (a) The former city official, officer or employee, during the two years immediately preceding termination of city employment, was engaged in the negotiation or administration of one or more contracts on behalf of the city with that employer and was in a position to make discretionary decisions affecting the outcome of such negotiation or the nature of such administration; and (b) Such a contract or contracts have a total value of more than ten thousand dollars; and (c) The duties of the employment with the employer or the activities for which the compensation would be received include fulfilling or implementing, in whole or in part, the provisions of such a contract or contracts or include the supervision or control of actions taken to fulfill or implement, in whole or in part, the provisions of such a contract or contracts. This session shall not be construed to prohibit a city elected or appointed official or a city employee from accepting employment with a city employee organization. 2. No former city official, officer or employee may, within a period of one year following the termination of city employment, have a direct or indirect beneficial interest in a contract or grant that was expressly authorized or funded by specific legislative or executive action in which the former city official, officer or employee participated. {BFP696127.DOQ1/00006.900000/} - 2 - Packet Page 834 of 895 3. No former city official, officer or employee may, within a period of one year following the termination of city employment, represent any person before any city board, body, agency, department, committee, examiner, adjustor, or commission regarding a specific project the former official or employee worked on, and was in a position to make discretionary decisions or recommendations, during his/her term of service or employment unless: (a) The former city official, officer or employee receives no compensation for representing that person; or (b) The specific project was a legislative issue; or (c) The matter involved in the representation by the former city official, officer or employee directly affects properties owned by the former city official, officer or employee. 4. Any elected or appointed official having the power to perform an official act or action shall, for a period of one year after the termination of his or her employment or term of service, refrain from lobbying the city department, agency, elected body, commission, or board on which they last served unless: (a) The former city elected or appointed official is receiving no compensation for such lobbying; or (b) The matter being lobbied directly affects properties owned by the former elected or appointed official. 3.70.020 Disclosure of Privileged, Confidential, or Proprietary Information. No former city official, officer or employee shall disclose or use any privileged, confidential, or proprietary information gained because of his or her service or employment with the city. 3.70.030 Exemption. 1. The prohibitions of ECC 3.10.010 notwithstanding, the city may contract with a former city official, officer or employee for expert or consultant services within one year of the latter's leaving city service upon determination and approval by resolution from the City Council that: {BFP696127.DOC;1/00006.900000/} - 3 - Packet Page 835 of 895 (a) It is important for the city to obtain the services in the contract, and time is of the essence; (b) The former city official, officer or employee is best qualified to perform the services, and contracting with another would result in undue burden on the city; and (c) The interests of the city, including but not limited to legal, financial and operations, will not be undermined as a result thereof. 2. The prohibitions of ECC 3.10.010 shall not apply to a former official, officer or employee acting on behalf of a governmental agency, if the City Council determines that the service to the agency is not adverse to the interest of the city. 3. Nothing in this ordinance shall prohibit an official elected to serve a governmental entity other than the City of Edmonds from carrying out his or her official duties for that government entity. 3.70.040 Penalties. Any person violating any provision of ECC 3,70.010 and ECC 3.70.020 shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor and subject to punishment in accordance with ECC 5.50.020. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum, and shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPRD D: Atle� - MAY G Y AAAKENSON f BFP696127.DOC; 1/00006.900000/) - 4 - Packet Page 836 of 895 ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Ad'o��- z &:�� ' TY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE APPROVEDYTA : OFFICE OF EY: BY W. SCOTT SNYDER FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 06/13/2008 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 06/17/2008 PUBLISHED: 06/22/2008 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/22/2008 ORDINANCE. NO, 3689 (BFFP696127.DDC. 1/00006.9000001) - 5 - Packet Page 837 of 895 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.3689 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 17th day of June, 2008, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No.3689. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 3 ECC, REVENUE AND FINANCE, TO ADD A NEW CHAPTER 3.70 ECC, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, REGARDING CONTRACTS WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 18th day of June, 2008, -'ear. CITY CLERK, SANDRA S. CHASE { €3FP696127.DOC; I/CD006.9000001} Packet Page 838 of 895 Humann, Debi From: Chase, Sandy Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 11:00 AM To: Humann, Debi Subject: RE: Ordinance Search Attachments: Ordinance 3689.pdf Hi Debi, I believe you are looking for Ordinance 3689 (attached) that was adopted in May 2008 that relates to "conflict of interest", former employees, etc. I did a quick word search for anything to do with "ethics" and nothing came up. Also, I do not recall any other ordinance that may apply. If I come across anything, I will be sure to let you know. Sandy From: Humann, Debi Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:34 AM To: Chase, Sandy Subject: Ordinance Search Hi Sandy: I know you are too busy for words but I need help when you get a chance. At last night's PS/HR Committee meeting, Wilson and Bernheim reviewed the Ethics Board issue. They requested that I supply the ordinance that apparently was prepared when Don Fiene went from being an employee to working for a private company. No idea what this is about. Don left our employment 4/08 if that helps. If you can think of any other ordinance that might deal with ethics, that would be appreciate also. Thank you. Debi Packet Page 839 of 895 to watch the January 23 joint meeting with the Planning Board, Economic Development Commission and the consultant. With regard to student volunteers, he recalled his son was a student volunteer on the skate park and worked three years to design and build it. He used that experience in college. If the Council pursues a parks levy, he recommended including a project for students in order to engage them in campaigning for the levy. He agreed with Mr. Hertrich's suggestion for the Council to appoint a representative to the School District and also suggested Councilmembers attend the Superintendent's monthly roundtable meetings. Councilmember Bloom explained she wanted the Council to adopt an ethics policy that addresses board/commission, elected officials and staff. There are many policies in Washington could be adapted for Edmonds. The next step is to form an ethics committee; if a citizen has a question about something such as a conflict of interest, they can go to the ethics committee and determine whether something is potentially an ethics violation. She recommended the Council, 1) adopt an ethics policy, and 2) form an ethics committee. She sought Council approval for the Public Safety & Personnel Committee to pursue this. Ms. Hite explained the recently adopted personnel policy has an extensive ethics policy for employees; that is the best place for policies regarding employees. She encouraged the Council to develop an ethics policy for boards/commissions and elected officials but not to include employees. Discussion followed regarding other cities' ethics policies, past unsuccessful efforts to develop a code of ethics policy, developing a policy with enough examples to provide direction, and the difference between a code of conduct and code of ethics. Summary: Refer development of code of ethics to Public Safety and Personnel Committee. 11. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION No action. 10. MISCELLANEOUS Based on yesterday's discussion regarding public comment at committee meetings, Council President Petso distributed language for committee meeting notices and asked Councilmember to submit comments/concerns to Ms. Chase. The retreat was adjourned at 11:37 p.m. Edmonds City Council Retreat Draft Minutes February 1-2, 2013 Page 21 Packet Page 840 of 895 Action: Take item to full Council for further discussion after draft discussion points and possible ordinance language received from Officer Dawson. C. Discussion and potential action regarding possible amendment of City Code 8.48, Parking, Paragraph 8.48.215 B.2. Joan Ferebee, Court Administrator, explained she attended a Parking Committee Meeting to bring to their attention the difficulty the Municipal Court is experiencing with the section of the City Code that allows citizens who receive a parking ticket to pay a reduced fine if the individual pays the fine by the end of the next business day after the issuance of the parking ticket. Generally, the Court does not have the tickets in their system that quickly. Therefore, the individuals can become very angry and upset when they come to the Municipal Court and are not able to pay. Ms. Ferebee stated that the Parking Committee recommended removing the section of the Code that allows for a reduced fine if it is paid by the end of the next business day. Councilmember Peterson stated that he was in agreement with eliminating the reduced fine. He stated that he would work with the City Attorney to create an ordinance to place on the consent agenda. Councilmember Bloom was in agreement. Action: Councilmember Peterson will work with the City Attorney to create an ordinance eliminating the reduced fine. The Ordinance is to be placed on a future Consent Agenda for approval. D. Student and Senior Volunteers Councilmember Bloom stated she would like to support the Boards and Commissions in obtaining student volunteers. She suggested that a senior volunteer could assist Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Assistant, in getting the word out to the various schools. Councilmember Peterson suggested Ms. Spellman could email the school board or a volunteer coordinator in the school system to determine if there are students interested in volunteering. Councilmember Bloom suggested a senior volunteer could work with Jana to develop a framework for contacting all of the schools with the appropriate person to contact and to advertise. Councilmember Peterson cautioned that managing a volunteer can take more time. He suggested talking with the Council President as she is in charge of Ms. Spellman's schedule. Councilmember Bloom also recalled that at the Council Retreat, Councilmember Johnson suggested an event be held to recognize city volunteers. Councilmember Bloom stated she will discuss with the Mayor the idea of scheduling a yearly event. E. Ethics Board and Code of Ethics Councilmember Bloom suggested narrowing down the list of sample policies from other cities for the City Attorney to work with in developing the policy for Edmonds. She suggested using the policies from the cities of Bainbridge Island, Lynnwood and Monroe. Public Safety & Personnel Committee March 12, 2013 Page 2 of 3 Packet Page 841 of 895 Councilmember Bloom stated that she would like the policy to include appointed officials (directors) in addition to elected officials and members of boards and commissions. Councilmember Peterson stated that he did not think the policy needed to address appointed officials (directors) as they answer to the Mayor. The Committee concluded that a further discussion on a Code of Ethics policy would be scheduled for the April Committee Meeting to determine which policy will be sent to the City Attorney. F. Discussion regarding taking minutes during Council Committee Meetings. Councilmember Peterson stated that if detailed/complete minutes are desired it would be necessary to pay someone to attend the meetings for this purpose. If action minutes are prepared (which is the way it has generally always been done), then he did not think councilmembers should take the minutes as it is difficult to participate in the discussion and take minutes. Councilmember Bloom agreed that councilmembers should not take minutes. After discussion, Councilmembers Bloom and Peterson agreed on the following recommendation: • Action minutes for committee meetings, prepared by staff members in attendance. • If a controversial item is scheduled, arrangements for more detailed minutes will be made. • Summary comments made by citizens should be included. Committee members will summarize citizen comments if no staff is available. • Work with Council President related to agenda items to make sure a staff member is available for each item discussed at the committee meeting. • Committee minutes are to be forwarded to committee chairs for review (as time allows). G. Public Comments There were no public comments. The committee meeting adjourned at 8:17 p.m. Public Safety & Personnel Committee March 12, 2013 Page 3 of 3 Packet Page 842 of 895 Councilmember Peterson suggested dropping reference to 2.10.050 in this section of the code. Councilmember Bloom next pointed out that 2.10.050 refers to both finance director and community services director, however the title of the section does not reflect this. Further, Councilmember Bloom believes the positions of Executive Assistant to the Council and the Mayor's Executive Assistant should not be part of this chapter as they are not City Officers. Committee members agreed to request the City Attorney to determine if these positions should be in a different section of the code. D. Discussion regarding Code of Ethics. Committee members discussed ethics policies from Bainbridge Island, Lynnwood and Kirkland. Councilmember Bloom referred to the policy from Bainbridge Island and would like to include the requirement for members to "disclose a conflict of interest" as a standing requirement at all city meetings for all officials. Councilmember Peterson commented that he believes the Council does a good job at this disclosure; however, having it on each agenda is a good reminder. Further discussion occurred related to policies, including the possible consideration of a Code of Ethics Officer. After discussion the committee agreed to forward to the next work session of the City Council the Bellevue and Kirkland ethics policies and the Kirkland Code of Conduct for discussion. The committee also recommended including the statement from Bainbridge Island related to disclosure of conflict of interest for all officials. After full Council discussion, direction can then be given to the City Attorney on how to proceed. Ms. Hite indicated she would bring back information on a Code of Ethics Officer. The meeting adjourned at 8:07 p.m. Public Safety & Personnel Committee July 9, 2013 Page 5 of 5 Packet Page 843 of 895 CITY OF KIRKLAND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR CITY COUNCIL AND BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS The Code of Conduct is supplemental to the Kirkland Municipal Code and the Code of Ethics and applies to the City Council and all members of City advisory boards and commissions. The Code of Conduct describes how Kirkland officials treat each other and work together for the common good of the community. Conducting the City's business in an atmosphere of respect and civility is the underlying theme in this code. City Officials are responsible for holding themselves and each other accountable for displaying actions and behaviors that consistently model the ideals expressed in the code. Implicit in the Code of Conduct is recognition of the worth of individual members and an appreciation for their individual talents, perspectives and contributions. The Code will ensure an atmosphere where individual members, staff and the public are free to express their ideas and work to their full potential. As a City Official of the City of Kirkland, I agree to these principles of conduct.• We consistently demonstrate the principles ofprofessionalism, respect and civility in working for the greater good of Kirkland, We assure fair and equal treatment of all people. We conduct ourselves both personally and professionally in a manner that is above reproach. We refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks on the character or motives of Council members, commissioners, staff and the public. We take care to avoid personal comments that could offend others. We show no tolerance for intimidating behaviors. We listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions and treat all people the way we wish to be treated. We serve as a model of leadership and civility to the community. Our actions inspire public confidence in Kirkland government. Packet Page 844 of 895 Keeping in mind the common good as the highest purpose, we will focus on holding efficient meetings that achieve constructive solutions for the public benefit, We work as a team to solve problems and render decisions that are based on the merits and substance of the matter. We respect differences and views of other people. We adhere to the principles and laws governing the Council/Manager form of government and treat all staff with respect and cooperation. We will refrain from interfering with the administrative functions and professional duties of staff. We will not publicly criticize individual staff but will privately communicate with the City Manager any concerns about a Department or Department Director or staff person. We will refrain from negotiating or making commitments without the involvement and knowledge of the City Manager. We will work with staff in a manner that consistently demonstrates mutual respect. We will not discuss personnel issues, undermine management direction, or give or imply direction to staff. We will communicate directly with the City Manager, department directors or designated staff contacts when asking for information, assistance or follow up. We will not knowingly blindside one another in public and will contact staff prior to a meeting with any questions or issues. We will not attend City staff meetings unless requested by staff. I acknowledge that I have received and read this Code of Conduct Name Date Packet Page 845 of 895 1336-ORD 06/05/13 CITY OF BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 6110 AN ORDINANCE repealing Bellevue City Code Chapter 3.92 and Ordinance No. 4049, and adopting new Bellevue City Code Chapter 3.92 providing for a Code of Ethics - City Council and City Boards, Commissions and Committees. WHEREAS, the citizens and business of Bellevue are entitled to have fair, ethical and accountable local government that has earned the public's full confidence for integrity; and WHEREAS, adopting a Code of Ethics for members of the City Council and the City's boards and commissions will promote public confidence in the integrity of local government and fair operation; and WHEREAS, the Code of Ethics will provide the basis for education and training for City officials both elected and appointed, to ensure that the highest standards and best practices with regard to ethics will be followed; now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Bellevue City Code Chapter 3.92 and Ordinance No. 4049 are hereby repealed. Section 2. A new Chapter 3.92 is hereby adopted to read as follows: 3.92.010 — POLICY A. Purpose. The Bellevue City Council has adopted a Code of Ethics for members of the City Council and Council -appointed public bodies to promote public confidence in the integrity of local government and its fair operation. This Code of Ethics will provide the basis for education and training for City Officials, both elected and appointed, to ensure that the highest standards and best practices with regard to ethics will be followed. B. Intent. The citizens and businesses of Bellevue are entitled to have fair, ethical and accountable local government that has earned the public's full confidence. It is further the intent that City Officials be permitted to fulfill their duties to represent the public to the greatest extent possible unless circumstances exist where such engagement is impermissible. Nothing in this chapter is intended to reduce, limit, or restrict the pool of available candidates for service on the Council or service on Council -appointed public bodies, all of which are either part-time or volunteer positions. It is in the public interest to ensure that barriers to citizen public service are not created by the provisions of this chapter. In keeping with the City of Packet Page 846 of 895 1336-O RD 06/05/13 Bellevue's commitment to excellence, the effective functioning of democratic government therefore requires that: (1) public officials, both elected and appointed, comply with the laws and policies affecting the operations of government; (2) public officials be independent, impartial and fair in their actions; (3) public office be used for the public good, not for personal gain; and (4) public deliberations and processes be conducted openly, unless legally confidential, in an atmosphere of respect and civility. 3.92.020 — DEFINITIONS A. "Official" means a member of the City Council or a member of Council - appointed City boards and commissions and other Council -appointed task groups or committees. B. "Relative" means spouse, domestic partner, child, step -child, parent, step- parent, parent -in-law and sibling. 3.92.030 — PROHIBITED CONDUCT A. Conflicts of Interest: Officials shall not participate in quasi-judicial or site - specific land use City decisions, the purchase or condemnation of property, or City decisions involving the awarding of a grant or contract in which any of the following has an interest: 1. The Official, 2. A relative, 3. An individual with whom the Official resides, or 4. An entity that the Official serves as an officer, director, trustee, partner or employee. Officials shall abstain from participating in deliberations and decision - making where conflicts exist. RCW 42.23.040 shall apply conflicts or potential conflicts with respect to remote interests in City decisions involving the awarding of a contract. B. Misuse of Public Position or Resources. Except for infrequent use at little or no cost to the City, Officials shall not use public resources that are not available to the public in general, such as City staff time, equipment, supplies or facilities, for other than a City purpose. 2 Packet Page 847 of 895 1336-ORD 06/05/13 C. Representation of Third Parties. Except in the course of official duties, Officials shall not appear on behalf of the financial interests of third parties before the bodies on which the Officials serve or in interaction with the body's assigned staff. Further, the members of the City Council shall not appear on behalf of the financial interest of third parties before the Council or any board, commission or proceeding of the City, or in interaction with staff. D. Solicitation of Charitable Contributions. No official may make direct personal solicitations for charitable contributions from City employees. E. Gifts and Favors. Officials shall not take any special advantage of services or opportunities for personal gain, by virtue of their public office, which are not available to the public in general. They may not solicit or receive any thing of monetary value from any person or entity where the thing of monetary value has been solicited or received or given, or to a reasonable person, would appear to have been solicited, or received or given with intent to give or obtain special consideration or influence as to any action by the Official in his or her official capacity; provided, that nothing shall prohibit campaign contributions which are solicited or received and reported in accordance with applicable law. They shall not accept or solicit any gifts, favors or promises of future benefits except as follows: 1. No Official may accept gifts, other than those specified in subsection 2 of this section, with an aggregate value in excess of fifty dollars ($50) from a single source in a calendar year or a single gift from multiple sources with a value in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in accordance with RCW 42.52.150(1); provided, that if the fifty dollar ($50) limit in RCW 42.52.150(1) is amended, this section shall be deemed to reflect the amended amount. For purposes of this section, "single source" means any person, corporation, or entity, whether acting directly or through any agent or other intermediary, and "single gift" includes any event, item, or group of items used in conjunction with each other or any trip including transportation, lodging, and attendant costs. The value of gifts given to an Official's family member or guest shall be attributed to the Official for the purpose of determining whether the limit has been exceeded, unless an independent business, family, or social relationship exists between the donor and the Official, family member or guest. 2. The following items are presumed not to influence the vote, action, or judgment of the Official, or be considered as part of a reward for action or inaction, and may be accepted without regard to the limit established by subsection 1 of this section: a. Unsolicited flowers, plants and floral arrangements; b. Unsolicited advertising or promotional items of nominal value, such as pens and note pads; c. Unsolicited tokens or awards of appreciation in the form of a plaque, trophy, desk item, wall memento, or similar item; 3 Packet Page 848 of 895 1336-O RD 06/05/13 d. Unsolicited items received by an Official for the purpose of evaluation or review, if the Official has no personal beneficial interest in the eventual use or acquisition of the item; e. Informational materials, publications or subscriptions related to the recipient's performance of official duties; f. Food and beverages consumed at hosted receptions where attendance is related to the Official's duties for the City; g. Admission to, and the cost of food and beverages consumed at, events sponsored by or in conjunction with a civic, charitable, governmental or community organization; h. Unsolicited gifts from dignitaries from another state or a foreign country which -are intended to be personal in nature; and i. Food and beverages on infrequent occasions in the ordinary course of meals where attendance by the Official is related to the performance of official d uties. j. Any gift which would have been offered or given to the Official if he or she were not an Official 3. The presumption in subsection 2 is rebuttable and may be overcome based on the circumstances surrounding the giving and acceptance of the item. G. Confidential Information. Officials shall not knowingly disclose or use any Confidential Information gained by reason of their official position for other than a City purpose nor may the Officer use such information for his or her personal benefit, nor may the Officer engage in business or professional activity that the Officer might reasonably expect would induce him or her by reason of his or her official position to disclose such Confidential Information.. "Confidential Information" means: 1. Specific information, rather than generalized knowledge, that is not available to a person who files a public records request, and 2. Information made confidential by law. • �� :► T 9 A. In addition to Section 3.92.030 of the Code of Ethics, which shall be administered by the Ethics Officer, Officials shall comply with the following standards: Compliance with other laws. Officials shall comply with Federal, State and City laws in the performance of their public duties. These laws include, but are not limited to: rd Packet Page 849 of 895 1336-ORD 06/05/13 The United States and Washington constitutions; laws pertaining to conflicts of interest, election campaigns, financial disclosures and open processes of government; and City ordinances and policies. See Appendix A. Officials shall comply with the requirements of RCW 42.17.020 through .060 regarding contract interests. As required by RCW 42.17.750, no Official shall knowingly solicit or encourage, directly or indirectly, any political contribution from any City employee. Except under limited circumstances described in RCW 42.17.130, no Official may use or authorize the use of the facilities of the City for the purpose of assisting a campaign for the election of any person to office, or form the promotion of or opposition to any ballot proposition in a manner not available to the general public on the same terms. B. Officials are also encouraged to comply with the following standards: 1. Personal Integrity. The professional and personal conduct of Officials must be above reproach and avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Officials shall refrain from abusive conduct, threats of official action, personal accusations or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other members of Council, boards and commissions, the staff or public. Officials shall maintain truthfulness and honesty and not compromise themselves for advancement, honor, or personal gain. Additionally, Officials shall not directly or indirectly induce, encourage or aid anyone to violate this Code of Ethics and it is incumbent upon Officials to make a good faith effort to address apparent violations of this Code of Ethics. 2. Working for the Common Good. Recognizing that stewardship of the public interest must be their primary concern, Officials will work for the common good of the people of Bellevue and not for any private or personal interest, and they will ensure fair and equal treatment of all persons, claims and transactions coming before the City Council, boards and commissions. 3. Respect for Process. Officials shall perform their duties in accordance with the processes and rules of order established by the City Council and boards and commissions governing the deliberation of public policy issues, meaningful involvement of the public, and implementation of policy decisions of the City Council by City staff. 4. Commitment to Transparency. Transparency, openness and accountability are fundamental values of the City — and are also required by the laws of the state of Washington. The public has a right to inspect and copy public records unless exempt by law from disclosure. All materials relating to the conduct of City government that are prepared, possessed, used or retained by any Official, including Email and other electronic records, are subject to requirements for retention, protection and disclosure. Officials may assume that all copies of materials received from City staff have already been archived and do not need to be retained. Officials shall not discard, damage or destroy the original copy of any public record unless the City complies with the record retention schedules established under Chapter 40.14 RCW. In accordance with the requirements of state law Officials shall 5 Packet Page 850 of 895 1336-ORD 06/05/13 promptly provide any records requested by the Public Records Officer in response to a disclosure request under the Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW. It is the responsibility for the Public Records Officer together with the City Attorney, to decide which records meet the definition of "public record" and whether or not such records are exempt from disclosure; Officials must not take it upon themselves to decide whether a record meets the definition of a public, record, that a record is exempt from disclosure, or to otherwise conceal a record. 5. Conduct of Public Meetings. Officials shall prepare themselves for public issues; listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body; and focus on the business at hand. They shall refrain from interrupting other speakers; or otherwise interfering with the orderly conduct of meetings. 6. Decisions Based on Merit. Officials shall base their decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand and on greater public policy considerations, rather than on unrelated considerations. 7. Ex parte Communications. In quasi-judicial matters, Officials shall publicly disclose substantive information that is relevant to a matter under consideration by the Council or boards and commissions, which they may have received from sources outside of the public decision -making process. 8. Attendance. As provided in RCW 35A.12.060, a Council Member shall forfeit his or her office by failing to attend three consecutive regular meetings of the Council without being excused by the Council. Unless excused, members of boards and commissions are expected to attend all meetings. 9. Nepotism. The City Council will not appoint Relatives of City Council Members to boards or commissions or other appointed positions. 10. Advocacy. When acting in an official capacity as a City Official representing the City, Officials shall represent the official policies or positions of the City Council, board or commission to the best of their ability when the City Council, board or commission has taken a position or given an instruction. When a City Official is appointed to fill an Official role on a governing body in a capacity that is not dependent upon their status as a City of Bellevue Official, but, for example, as a representative of a geographic area, the Official shall endeavor to represent the policies or positions consistent with those of the constituency he or she has been appointed to represent. When presenting their individual opinions and positions, members shall explicitly state they do not represent their body or the Gity of Bellevue, nor will they allow the inference that they do. Officials have the right to endorse candidates for all Council seats or other elected offices. It is inappropriate to make or display endorsements during Council meetings, board/commission meetings, or other official City meetings. However, this does not preclude Officials from participating in ceremonial occasions, community events or other events sponsored by civic groups. C• Packet Page 851 of 895 1336-ORD 06/05/13 11. Role of Legislative Officials. The Council shall have all the powers and authority granted to legislative bodies, except insofar as such power and authority is vested in the City Manager in accordance with Chapter 35A.13 RCW. UATITSYSTIT41 WMA Ch. 9A.72 RCW Perjury and interference with official proceedings RCW 35A.12.060 Vacancy for nonattendance Ch. 35A.13 RCW Council-manager plan of government RCW 35A.13.020 Incompatible offices Ch. 40.13 RCW Preservation and destruction of public records RCW 42.17.130 Use of public office or agency facilities in campaigns — prohibition — exceptions RCW 42.17.750 Solicitation of contributions by public officials or employees Ch. 42.23 RCW Code of ethics for municipal officers — contract interests Ch. 42.36 RCW Appearance of fairness doctrine — limitations Ch. 42.56 RCW Public Records Act 3.92.50 — NO RIGHT OF ACTION CREATED; EFFECTIVE DATE. A. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as creating or providing a basis for a private cause of action against the City or against any Official by third parties. B. No retroactive application is intended by the adoption of this chapter which shall only apply to acts that occur after the effective date thereof. 3.92.060 — ETHICS OFFICER A. The City Council creates the position of Ethics Officer. The City Council will interview and choose the ethics officer(s) who shall operate under contract with the City of Bellevue. Such selection shall be by unanimous vote, and the Ethics Officer shall be admitted to the practice of law and shall have sufficient experience and training. The services of the Ethics Officer may be terminated only by a supermajority vote of the Council. B. The Ethics Officer will provide for annual review of this Code of Ethics, review of training materials provided for education regarding the Code of Ethics, and advisory opinions concerning the Code of Ethics. The Ethics Officer shall also be responsible for the prompt and fair enforcement of its provisions when necessary, and shall at all times maintain the impartiality of the office by revealing information provided to the Officer only in the context of rendering opinions to the City and its Officials and staff as necessary or in response to legal process. 7 Packet Page 852 of 895 1336-ORD 06/05/13 C. The Ethics Officer, in addition to other duties, shall conduct a review of this ethics code in 2015 and again in 2017 and may recommend changes or additions to this Code of Ethics to the City Council designed to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of processing ethics questions. D. In rendering opinions under 3.92.070 or 3.92.080 below, the Ethics Officer shall consider the Intent section contained in 3.92.010 herein and in RCW 42.23.010. 3.92.070. - ADVISORY OPINIONS A. Upon request of any Official, the Ethics Officer shall render written advisory opinions concerning the applicability of Sections 3.92.030 and 3.92.040 of this Code to hypothetical circumstances and/or situations solely related to the persons making the request. The Ethics Officer will not render opinions on matters that are the purview of other government agencies such as the Public Disclosure Commission or the King County Prosecutor. B. Upon request of any Official, the Ethics Officer may also render written advisory opinions concerning the applicability of the Code of Ethics to hypothetical circumstances and/or situations related to a matter of city- wide interest or policy. C. The Ethics Officer will endeavor to respond to requests for advisory opinions within fourteen (14) days of submission of the request, or more rapidly if the requester expresses urgency in the request. D. An Official's conduct based in reasonable reliance on an advisory opinion rendered by the Ethics Officer shall not be found to violate this Code of Ethics, as long as all material facts have been fully, completely, accurately presented in a written request for an advisory opinion, the Ethics Officer issues an advisory opinion that the described conduct would not violate the Code of Ethics, and the Official's conduct is consistent with the advisory opinion. The Ethics Officer reserves the right to reconsider the questions and issues raised in an advisory opinion and, where the public interest requires, rescind, modify, or terminate the opinion, but a modified or terminated advisory opinion will not form the basis of a retroactive enforcement action against the original requestor. Advisory opinions will contain severability clauses indicating that, should portions of the opinion be found to be unenforceable or not within the Ethics Officer's authority, the remainder of the opinion shall remain intact. E. All Officials subject to this chapter are strongly encouraged to seek advisory opinions from the Ethics Officer at the earliest possible Es3 Packet Page 853 of 895 1336-ORD 06/05/13 opportunity whenever an official has reason to believe that his or her circumstances could present a conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest or any other violation of this chapter. F. Advisory opinions are subject to the attorney -client privilege. WAI A. Complaint procedures. 1. Any natural person who believes an Official has committed a violation of the code may file a complaint with the City Clerk. Complaints shall be subject to the following requirements: a. The complaint must be based upon facts within the personal knowledge of the complainant; b. The complaint must be submitted in writing and signed under oath by the complainant; c. The complaint must include a detailed factual description of the alleged violation including the date, time and place of each occurrence and the name of the person or persons who are alleged to have committed a violation. The complaint must also refer to the specific provisions of the Code of Ethics which are alleged to have been violated; d. The complaint must be accompanied by all available documentation or other evidence known to the complainant to support the allegations of the complaint; e. The complaint must be filed within two years of the date of the occurrence or occurrences alleged to constitute a violation of the Code of Ethics. 2. Complaints shall be filed with the City Clerk who shall forward the complaint and any accompanying documentation and evidence to the Ethics Officer and the respondent Official within two business days. The Ethics Officer shall review the complaint for compliance with the requirements of subsection 1 of this section. Should the Ethics Officer find that: a. The complaint is untimely; or b. The complaint has not been signed under oath; or c. The complaint does not, on its face, state facts which, if proven to be true, constitute a violation of the provision of this Code of Ethics referred to in the complaint; or E Packet Page 854 of 895 1336-ORD 06/05/13 d. The complaint fails to refer to a specific provision of the Code of Ethics which is alleged to have been violated, the Ethics Officer shall, within 10 working days of the filing of the complaint, enter a written order stating the Ethics Officer's findings and, except as hereinafter provided, dismissing the complaint. The written order shall be transmitted to the complainant, the Official that is the subject of the complaint, and the City Council. If the Ethics Officer finds that the complaint is deficient pursuant to the findings in subsection 1(b) or (d) of this section, the Ethics Officer shall issue an order notifying the complainant that unless a corrected complaint is filed within five days of the issuance of such order, the complaint shall be dismissed. The complainant may appeal the dismissal of a complaint under this subsection by filing an action in the King County superior court for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Chapter 7.16 RCW within 10 days of the date of issuance of the order dismissing the complaint. 3. The respondent Official shall, within 20 days of the date of mailing or personal service of the complaint by the Clerk, file with the Clerk any response to the complaint the respondent Official wishes to make. A response to a complaint shall be made in writing signed under oath by the respondent. A response may include a detailed statement of facts pertaining to the complaint made on personal knowledge of the respondent and may include any matter constituting a defense to the complaint. A response should be accompanied by all available documentation or other evidence known to the respondent Official which the respondent wishes the Ethics Officer to consider. The respondent Official may stipulate to some or all of the facts alleged in the complaint and shall either admit or deny the alleged violation. If the violation is admitted, the respondent may also submit an explanatory statement and may request a particular disposition. 4. Upon receipt of a response to a complaint, the Ethics Officer shall review the complaint and response, together with all supporting documentation and evidence submitted by the complainant and the respondent Official. Within 10 days of receipt of the response (or, if no timely response is submitted, within 30 days of the date of mailing the complaint to the respondent Official by the City Clerk), the Ethics Officer shall issue a decision in writing, including findings of fact, conclusions of law and a determination of whether any violation of the Code of Ethics has been established. The final written decision shall be signed and dated by the Ethics Officer. The City Clerk shall deliver a copy of the final written decision to the complainant, the respondent Official, the City Council and to any other person who has submitted a written request therefor. 5. A Complaint for Ethical Violations filed under this Chapter shall be considered a claim filed against an Official pursuant to Chapter 3.81 BCC. 6. Either the complainant or respondent Official may, within 30 days of the date of the written decision, appeal to the King County superior court by writ of certiorari pursuant to Chapter 7.16 RCW. 10 Packet Page 855 of 895 1336-ORD 06/05/13 7. If the final decision of the Ethics Officer contains a determination that one or more violations of this Code of Ethics has occurred, the decision shall also contain any recommendations of the Ethics Officer to the City Council for any remedial action or sanction that the Council may find appropriate and lawful under the Council's Rules. If no appeal is filed in superior court, the Council in consultation with the City Attorney shall, within 45 days of the date of the decision, determine what, if any, of the recommendations of the Ethics Officers to adopt. Such determination shall be adopted at an open public meeting by a majority vote of those Officials who are not respondents to the complaint or complaints. Section 3. Severability. Should any provision of this ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance be held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty days after passage and publication. Passed by the City Council this " day of , 2013 and signed in authentication of its passage this 5 day of , 2013. (SEAL) Approved as to form: Lori M. Riordan, City Attorney Attest: Myrna L. Basich, City Clerk Published t; Conrad Lee, Mayor 11 Packet Page 856 of 895 Ethics Requirements for Advisory Commissions and Committees The Bainbridge Island Ethics Program (revised March 23, 2011) now applies to the citizen members of advisory commissions and committees as well as city officials. Accordingly, advisory group members must comply with the requirements of the Code of Ethics in Article II of the Ethics Program. These requirements are summarized below; please consult the Code of Ethics for specific language and details of the requirements. 1. Gifts and Compensation. An advisory group member and his or her immediate family members may not accept gifts related to the advisory group member's services to the city, with some exceptions including unsolicited gifts of trivial value. 2. Confidentiality. An advisory group member or former member may not disclose or use privileged, confidential or proprietary information obtained in the course of his or her duties as a member. 3. Conflict of Interest. An advisory group member may not act officially on a matter in which the member or an immediate family member has any substantial employment related to the matter or other financial or private interest in the matter, or is party to a contract or owns an interest in property that would be significantly affected by the action. However, if the member fully discloses the conflict on the public record, the commission or committee may vote to allow the member to participate in discussion or vote. Members of advisory groups shall sign a conflict of interest statement upon appointment and reappointment. 4. Conduct of Public Meetings. Advisory group meetings should be conducted in a manner that maximizes transparency of relationships that could affect decision -making. Meetings should have a standing agenda item for members to disclose relationships with persons and issues on the agenda, and members should discuss these relationships to judge whether a conflict of interest exists. 7/14 Packet Page 857 of 895 CITY OF KIRKLAND Chapter 3.14 CODE OF ETHICS Sections: 3.14.010 Policy. 3.14.020 Definitions. 3.14.030 Prohibited conduct. 3.14.040 Financial disclosure statements. 3.14.050 Ethical standards. 3.14.060 Ethics officer. 3.14.070 Advisory opinions. 3.14.080 Complaints, investigations, hearings and enforcement. 3.14.010 Policy. (a) Purpose. The Kirkland city council has adopted a code of ethics for members of the city council and the city's boards and commissions to promote public confidence in the integrity of local government and its fair operation. This code of ethics will provide the basis for education and training for city officials, both elected and appointed, to ensure that the highest standards and best practices with regard to ethics will be followed. (b) Intent. The citizens and businesses of Kirkland are entitled to have fair, ethical and accountable local government that has earned the public's full confidence. In keeping with the city of Kirkland's commitment to excellence, the effective functioning of democratic government therefore requires that: (1) Public officials, both elected and appointed, comply with the laws and policies affecting the operations of government; (2) Public officials be independent, impartial and fair in their judgment and actions; (3) Public office be used for the public good, not for personal gain; and (4) Public deliberations and processes be conducted openly, unless legally confidential, in an atmosphere of respect and civility. (Ord. 4348 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2012) 3.14.020 Definitions. (a) "Official" means a member of the city council or a member of council -appointed city boards and commissions and other council -appointed task groups or committees, including youth members. (b) "Relative" means spouse or domestic partner, child, step -child, parent, step- parent, parent -in-law, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, son - or daughter-in-law, brother- or sister-in-law. (Ord. 4348 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2012) 3.14.030 Prohibited conduct. (a) Conflicts of Interest. In order to ensure their independence and impartiality on behalf of the common good, officials shall not participate in government decisions in which any of the following has a financial interest: (1) the official, (2) a relative, (3) an individual with whom the official resides, or (4) an entity that the official serves as an Attachment 11 Packet Page 858 of 895 officer, director, trustee, partner or employee. Officials shall abstain from participating in deliberations and decision -making where conflicts exist. This section shall not apply (1) to decisions regarding taxes or fees, (2) if the financial interest is shared with more than ten percent of the city's population, or (3) if the financial interest exists solely because of the official's ownership of less than one percent of the outstanding shares of a publicly traded corporation. (b) Appearance of Conflict. If it could appear to a reasonable person, having knowledge of the relevant circumstances, that the official's judgment is impaired because of either (1) a personal or business relationship not covered under the foregoing subsection, or (2) a transaction or activity engaged in by the official, the official shall make a public, written disclosure of the facts giving rise to the appearance of a conflict before participating in the matter. (c) Misuse of Public Position or Resources. Except for infrequent use at little or no cost to the city, officials shall not use public resources that are not available to the public in general, such as city staff time, equipment, supplies or facilities, for other than a city purpose. (d) Representation of Third Parties. Except in the course of official duties, officials shall not appear on behalf of the financial interests of third parties before the bodies on which the officials serve or in interaction with assigned staff. However, the members of the city council shall not appear on behalf of the financial interest of third parties before the council or any board, commission or proceeding of the city, or in interaction with staff. (e) Solicitations of Charitable Contributions. No official may make direct personal solicitations for charitable contributions from city employees. (f) Gifts and Favors. Officials shall not take any special advantage of services or opportunities for personal gain, by virtue of their public office, which are not available to the public in general. They may not solicit or receive any thing of monetary value from any person or entity where the thing of monetary value has been solicited, or received or given or, to a reasonable person, would appear to have been solicited, received or given with intent to give or obtain special consideration or influence as to any action by the official in his or her official capacity; provided, that nothing shall prohibit campaign contributions which are solicited or received and reported in accordance with applicable law. They shall not accept or solicit any gifts, favors or promises of future benefits except as allowed by Section 3.80.140. (g) Confidential Information. Officials shall not disclose or use any confidential information gained by reason of their official position for other than a city purpose. "Confidential information" means (1) specific information, rather than generalized knowledge, that is not available to a person who files a public records request, and (2) information made confidential by law. (Ord. 4348 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2012) 3.14.040 Financial disclosure statements. All officials, except members of the city council, shall file a city of Kirkland disclosure statement annually. In accordance with Chapter 42.17 RCW, members of the Kirkland city council shall disclose investments, interests in real property, sources of income, and creditors through the filing of a Public Disclosure Commission Form F-1, "Personal Financial Affairs Statement." Members of boards and commissions shall be advised, as part of the application process, that they will be required to file the applicable city of Attachment 11 2 Packet Page 859 of 895 Kirkland disclosure statement within ten days of appointment. (Ord. 4348 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2012) 3.14.050 Ethical standards. In addition to Section 3.14.030 of the code of ethics, which shall be administered by the ethics officer, officials are also encouraged to comply with the following standards: (1) Compliance with Other Laws. Officials shall comply with federal, state and city laws in the performance of their public duties. These laws include, but are not limited to: the United States and Washington Constitutions; laws pertaining to conflicts of interest, election campaigns, financial disclosures and open processes of government; and city ordinances and policies. See Appendix A. As required by RCW 42.17.750, no official shall knowingly solicit or encourage, directly or indirectly, any political contribution from any city employee. Except under limited circumstances described in RCW 42.17.130, no official may use or authorize the use of the facilities of the city for the purpose of assisting a campaign for the election of any person to any office, or for the promotion of or opposition to any ballot proposition in a manner not available to the general public on the same terms. (2) Personal Integrity. The professional and personal conduct of officials must be above reproach and avoid even the appearance of impropriety. Officials shall refrain from abusive conduct, threats of official action, personal accusations or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other members of council, boards and commissions, the staff or public. Officials shall maintain truthfulness and honesty and not compromise themselves for advancement, honor, or personal gain. Additionally, officials shall not directly or indirectly induce, encourage or aid anyone to violate the code of ethics and it is incumbent upon officials to make a good faith effort to address apparent violations of this code of ethics. (3) Working for the Common Good. Recognizing that stewardship of the public interest must be their primary concern, officials will work for the common good of the people of Kirkland and not for any private or personal interest, and they will ensure fair and equal treatment of all persons, claims and transactions coming before the city council, boards and commissions. Officials need to be mindful that making special requests of staff —even when the response does not benefit the official personally —puts staff in an awkward position. (4) Respect for Process. Officials shall perform their duties in accordance with the processes and rules of order established by the city council and board and commissions governing the deliberation of public policy issues, meaningful involvement of the public, and implementation of policy decisions of the city council by city staff. (5) Commitment to Transparency. Transparency, openness, and accountability are fundamental values of the city —and are also required by the laws of the state of Washington. The public has a right to inspect and copy public records unless exempt by law from disclosure. All materials relating to the conduct of city government that are prepared, possessed, used or retained by any official, including email and other electronic records, are subject to requirements for retention, protection, and disclosure. Officials may assume that all copies of materials received from city staff have already been archived and do not need to be retained. Officials shall not discard, damage, or destroy the original copy of any public record unless directed by the city public records officer (the city clerk), who has responsibility to ensure that the city complies with the Attachment 11 3 Packet Page 860 of 895 record retention schedules established under Chapter 40.14 RCW. Officials shall promptly provide any records requested by the public records officer in response to a disclosure request under the Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW. It is the responsibility of the public records officer, together with the city attorney, to decide which records meet the definition of "public record" and whether or not they are exempt from disclosure; officials must not take it upon themselves to decide whether a record meets the definition of a public record, that a record is exempt from disclosure, or to otherwise conceal a record. (6) Conduct of Public Meetings. Officials shall prepare themselves for public issues; listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body; and focus on the business at hand. They shall refrain from interrupting other speakers; making personal comments not germane to the business of the body; or otherwise interfering with the orderly conduct of meetings. (7) Decisions Based on Merit. Officials shall base their decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations. (8) Ex Parte Communications. In quasi-judicial matters, officials shall publicly disclose substantive information that is relevant to a matter under consideration by the council or boards and commissions, which they may have received from sources outside of the public decision -making process. (9) Attendance. As provided in RCW 35A.12.060, a council member shall forfeit his or her office by failing to attend three consecutive regular meetings of the council without being excused by the council. Unless excused, members of boards and commissions are expected to attend all meetings. (10) Nepotism. The city council will not appoint relatives of city council members to boards or commissions or other appointed positions. (11) Advocacy. When acting in an official capacity as a city official representing the city, officials shall represent the official policies or positions of the city council, board or commission to the best of their ability when the city council, board or commission has taken a position or given an instruction. When presenting their individual opinions and positions, members shall explicitly state they do not represent their body or the city of Kirkland, nor will they allow the inference that they do. Officials have the right to endorse candidates for all council seats or other elected offices. It is inappropriate to make or display endorsements during council meetings, board/commission meetings, or other official city meetings. However, this does not preclude officials from participating it ceremonial occasions, community events, or other events sponsored by civic groups. (12) Policy Role of Officials. Officials shall respect and adhere to the council- manager structure of Kirkland city government as outlined by Chapter 35A.13 RCW. In this structure, the city council determines the policies of the city with the advice, information and analysis provided by the public, boards and commissions, and city staff. Except as provided by state law, officials shall not interfere with the administrative functions of the city or the professional duties of city staff; nor shall they impair the ability of staff to implement council policy decisions. Attachment 11 4 Packet Page 861 of 895 APPENDIX A Ch. 9A.72 Perjury and interference with RCW official proceedings RCW Vacancy for nonattendance 35A.12.060 Ch. 35A.13 Council-manager plan of RCW government RCW Incompatible offices 35A.13.020 Ch. 40.14 Preservation and destruction of RCW public records RCW Use of public office or agency 42.17.130 facilities in campaigns — Prohibition —Exceptions RCW Solicitation of contributions by 42.17.750 public officials or employees Ch. 42.23 Code of ethics for municipal RCW officers —Contract interests Ch. 42.36 Appearance of fairness RCW doctrine —Limitations Ch. 42.56 Public Records Act RCW KMC Kirkland code on acceptance of 3.80.140 g ifts Ch. 3.12 Limitations on campaign KMC contribution (Ord. 4348 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2012) 3.14.060 Ethics officer. (a) The city council creates the position of ethics officer. The city manager will contract with one or more agencies to fill this position. The ethics officer will provide for annual review of the code of ethics, review of training materials provided for education regarding the code of ethics, and advisory opinions concerning the code of ethics. The ethics officer shall also be responsible for the prompt and fair enforcement of its provisions when necessary. (b) The ethics officer, in addition to other duties, may recommend changes or additions to this code of ethics to the city council. The ethics officer shall provide input into and review the training materials and program developed for this code of ethics. (Ord. 4348 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2012) 3.14.070 Advisory opinions. (a) Upon request of any official, the ethics officer shall render written advisory opinions concerning the applicability of Sections 3.14.030 and 3.14.040 of this code to hypothetical circumstances and/or situations solely related to the persons making the request. The ethics officer will not render opinions on matters that are the purview of Attachment 11 Packet Page 862 of 895 61 other government agencies or officials, e.g., the public disclosure commission, the city public records officer, etc. (b) Upon request of any official, the ethics officer may also render written advisory opinions concerning the applicability of the code of ethics to hypothetical circumstances and/or situations related to a matter of city-wide interest or policy. (c) The ethics officer will endeavor to respond to requests for advisory opinions within forty-five days of submission of the request, or more rapidly if the requester expresses urgency in the request. (d) A person's conduct based in reasonable reliance on an advisory opinion rendered by the ethics officer shall not be found to violate this code of ethics, as long as all material facts have been fully, completely, accurately presented in a written request for an advisory opinion, the ethics officer issues an advisory opinion that the described conduct would not violate the code of ethics, and the person's conduct is consistent with the advisory opinion. The ethics officer reserves the right to reconsider the questions and issues raised in an advisory opinion and, where the public interest requires, rescind, modify, or terminate the opinion, but a modified or terminated advisory opinion will not form the basis of a retroactive enforcement action against the original requestor. Advisory opinions will contain severability clauses indicating that should portions of the opinion be found to be unenforceable or not within the ethics officer's authority, the remainder of the opinion shall remain intact. (Ord. 4348 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2012) 3.14.080 Complaints, investigations, hearings and enforcement. The ethics officer shall resolve inadvertent and minor violations of the code of ethics informally and may resolve inadvertent or minor violations informally, unless the ethics officer determines that doing so would not serve the public interest. When a violation is neither inadvertent nor minor, the ethics officer may initiate an action in accordance with this section. (1) Complaint Process. (A) Complaint Requirements —Service. Any person may submit a written complaint to the ethics officer alleging one or more violations of this code of ethics by an official. The complaint must set forth specific facts with enough precision and detail for the ethics officer to make a determination of sufficiency. It must be signed under penalty of perjury by the person(s) submitting it in a manner consistent with Chapter 9A.72 RCW. (B) Finding of Sufficiency. The ethics officer shall make a determination of sufficiency within thirty days of receipt of the written complaint. A complaint shall be sufficient if the allegations, if established, would violate Section 3.14.030 or 3.14.040 of this code. The ethics officer's determination is not reviewable. If the finding is one of sufficiency of the complaint, then the ethics officer shall investigate the complaint as set forth below. (C) Dismissal. The ethics officer shall dismiss the complaint if the ethics officer determines that the violation was inadvertent and minor; or a violation occurred, but appropriate actions have been taken to fully address the allegedly unethical conduct. (D) Notice. Notice of action by the ethics officer shall be provided as follows- (i) Notice of a finding of insufficiency or dismissal of a complaint by the ethics officer shall be sent to the person who made the complaint and the person complained against within seven days of the decision by the ethics officer. A finding of insufficiency or Attachment 11 6 Packet Page 863 of 895 dismissal of a complaint by the ethics officer is final and binding, and no administrative or other legal appeal is available through the ethics officer. (ii) Within seven days of the ethics officer rendering a finding of sufficiency, the city clerk shall send notice to the person who made the complaint and the person complained against, of the ethics officer's determination. If, after investigation, the ethics officer has reason to believe that a material violation of Section 3.14.030 or 3.14.040 has occurred, the city clerk shall give notice of the public hearing which will be held to determine if a violation has occurred. Notice shall be provided at least thirty days prior to the date set for the hearing. The person complained against shall have the right to file a written answer to the charge and to appear at the hearing with or without legal counsel, submit testimony, be fully heard, and to examine and cross examine witnesses. (E) Stipulations. At any time after a complaint has been filed with the ethics officer, the ethics officer may seek and make recommendations that the city council enter into a stipulation with the person complained against. The recommended stipulation will include the nature of the complaint, relevant facts, the reasons the ethics officer thinks a stipulation is appropriate, an admission of the violation by the person complained against, a promise by the person complained against not to repeat the violation, and if appropriate, a recommended remedy or penalty. The recommended stipulation shall be sent to the person who made the complaint and the person complained against and forwarded to the city council for action. (2) Conduct of Hearings. (A) All hearings on complaints found to be sufficient by the ethics officer shall be conducted by the hearing examiner. The hearing shall be informal, meaning that the hearing examiner shall not be bound by the strict rules of evidence prevailing in courts of law or equity. The hearing examiner may call witnesses on his or her own motion and compel the production of books, records, papers, or other evidence as needed. To that end, the hearing examiner shall issue subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum. All testimony shall be under oath administered by the hearing examiner. The hearing examiner may adjourn the hearing from time to time to allow for the orderly presentation of evidence. The hearing examiner shall prepare an official record of the hearing, including all testimony, which shall be recorded by mechanical device, and exhibits; provided, that the hearing examiner shall not be required to transcribe such records unless presented with a request accompanied by payment of the cost of transcription. (B) Within thirty days after the conclusion of the hearing, the hearing examiner shall, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, make and fully record in his or her permanent records, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and his or her recommended disposition. A copy of the findings, conclusions, and recommended disposition shall be sent to the person who made the complaint and to the person complained against. Additional copies of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations shall be forwarded to the ethics officer and city council. (3) City Council Action. Final city council action to decide upon stipulations and recommendations from the ethics officer and findings, conclusions, and recommendations from the hearing examiner shall be by majority vote in a public meeting. If the proceeding involves a member of the city council, deliberations by the council may be in executive session. The member of the council against whom the Attachment 11 7 Packet Page 864 of 895 complaint was made will not participate in any executive session and shall not vote on any matter involving him or herself. However, upon request of the member of the council against whom the complaint was made, a public hearing or public meeting before the council will be held on the issue of penalties. (4) Disposition. In the event the hearing examiner finds that the person against whom the complaint was made has violated the code of ethics, then the city council may take any of the following actions by a majority vote of the council. The action of the city council shall be final and not subject to further review or appeal except as may be otherwise provided by law or as provided in subsection (5) of this section. (A) Dismissal. Dismissal of the complaint without penalties. (B) Referral. A complaint may be referred to another agency with jurisdiction over the violation, such as the public disclosure commission. Final action on the complaint may be stayed pending resolution of the matter by the agency to which it was referred. (C) Admonition. An admonition shall be an oral non-public statement made by the mayor, or his/her designee, or if the complaint is against the mayor, the deputy mayor or his/her designee, to the official. (D) Reprimand. A reprimand shall be administered to the official by a resolution of reprimand by the city council. The resolution shall be prepared by the city council and shall be signed by the mayor or, if the complaint is against the mayor, the deputy mayor. (E) Censure. A resolution of censure shall be a resolution read personally to the person in public. The resolution shall be prepared by the city council and shall be signed by the mayor, or if the complaint is against the mayor, the deputy mayor. The person shall appear at a city council meeting at a time and place directed by the city council to receive the resolution of censure. Notice shall be given at least twenty calendar days before the scheduled appearance at which time a copy of the proposed resolution of censure shall be provided to the person. The resolution of censure shall be read publicly, and the person shall not make any statement in support of, or in opposition thereto, or in mitigation thereof. The resolution of censure shall be read at the time it is scheduled whether or not the official appears as required. (F) Removal —Member of Board or Commission or Other Appointed Task Group or Committee. In the event the individual against whom the complaint was made is currently a member of a city board or commission or other task group or committee, appointed by the city council, the city council may, in addition to other possible penalties set forth in this section, and notwithstanding any other provision of the Kirkland Municipal Code, by a majority vote remove the individual from such board or commission effective immediately. (G) Civil Penalties. The city council may assess a civil penalty of up to one thousand dollars or three times the economic value of anything received in violation of this code of ethics or three times the economic value of any loss to the city, whichever is greater. Any monetary penalty assessed civilly shall be placed in the city's general fund. (H) Contract Void. As provided by RCW 42.23.050, any contract made in violation of Chapter 42.23 RCW, "Code of ethics for municipal officers— contract interests," is void. (1) Other Penalties. The city council may impose a restriction, loss of a committee assignment, or loss of appointment as a representative of the city for any regional or Attachment 11 8 Packet Page 865 of 895 multijurisdictional body or membership on any board or commission which requires an appointment or confirmation of an appointment by the city council. (5) Review of Civil Penalties. If the city council orders an official to pay a civil penalty, the official may seek a writ of review from the superior court pursuant to Chapter 7.16 RCW, within thirty days of the city council's order. (6) Protection Against Retaliation. Neither the city nor any official may take or threaten to take, directly or indirectly, official or personal action, including but not limited to discharge, discipline, personal attack, harassment, intimidation, or change in job, salary, or responsibilities, against any person because that person files a complaint with the ethics officer. (7) Public Records. Records filed with the ethics officer become public records that may be subject to inspection and copying by members of the public, unless an exemption in law exists. To the extent required to prevent an unreasonable invasion of personal privacy interests protected by RCW 42.56.230(2), identity information may be redacted when an unsubstantiated complaint is made available in response to a public records request; however, in each case, the justification for the redaction shall be explained fully in writing. A finding by the ethics officer determining that a complaint is sufficient shall contain at the beginning the following specific language: NOTICE: ANY PORTION OF THIS FINDING DETERMINING SUFFICIENCY OF ANY PORTION OF A COMPLAINT DOES NOT DETERMINE THE TRUTH OR FALSITY OF THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPLAINT FILED WITH THE ETHICS OFFICER. THE ETHICS OFFICER HAS ONLY DETERMINED THAT IF CERTAIN FACTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPLAINT ARE FOUND TO BE TRUE DURING A LATER HEARING TO BE CONDUCTED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER, THEN VIOLATION(S) OF THE CODE OF ETHICS MAY BE FOUND TO HAVE OCCURRED. The city shall release copies of any written reports resulting from an investigation of a sustained complaint, any hearing examiner orders, and any written censures or reprimands issued by the city council, in response to public records requests consistent with Chapter 42.56 RCW and any other applicable public disclosure laws. (8) Liberal Construction —Limitation Period —Effective Date. (A) This code of ethics shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose and policy and to supplement existing laws that relate to the same subject. (B) Any action taken under this code of ethics must be commenced within three years from the date of violation. (C) This code of ethics shall take effect February 18, 2012. (Ord. 4348 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2012) Attachment 11 9 Packet Page 866 of 895 Councilmember Johnson said longevity compensation makes sense for employees who are at the top of their scale and have no opportunity for further advancement. She expressed interest in further information about the fiscal impact of longevity compensation retroactive to 2013 as well as the fiscal impact for outlying years. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented the pay scale for nonrepresented employees is a separate issue and should be addressed separately rather than piecemealed via longevity pay. She noted longevity pay would not motivate employees to seek promotion or to remain in the City's employment. Longevity pay is part of a compensation package that was negotiated with the other groups. She preferred to consider longevity pay for nonrepresented employees as part of a compensation package. Ms. Hite pointed out longevity compensation was part of a package for nonrepresented employees that the compensation consultant presented to the Council. The Council asked to have it pulled out for continued discussion. Councilmember Peterson agreed the Council was provided a compensation package for nonrepresented that was similar to represented employees. It was the Council's decision to separate out some items. He suggested the next agenda memo include the complete compensation package that was presented by the compensation consultant. Ms. Hite summarized the information the Council was requesting in addition to the original compensation package includes, 1) the fiscal impact for retroactivity in 2013, 2) fiscal impact for outlying years, 3) a flat rate approach and the fiscal impact. Due to the absence of 3 Councilmembers from the September 17 and 24 meetings, Mayor Earling suggested information be provided at next week's meeting or a full Council meeting be held on September 10. Council President Petso suggested either staff return with the information soon or it be addressed as a decision package in the 2014 budget. 11. DISCUSSION REGARDING CODE OF ETHICS Parks & Recreation/Reporting Human Resources Director Carrie Hite explained the Personnel Committee has been comparing and contrasting Codes of Ethics for cities throughout the Puget Sound region. Two documents the committee has been considering include Kirkland and Bellevue's Code of Ethics. The committee has also discussed Bainbridge Island's code. Kirkland adopted a Code of Conduct in addition to a Code of Ethics. She explained a Code of Conduct describes professional responsibilities; a Code of Ethics describes legal responsibilities. A Code of Ethics would apply to the Council, boards and commissions; staff is guided by a Code of Conduct in the City's personnel policies. The Personnel Committee has also expressed interest in identifying an Ethics Officer. Some of the comparable models reviewed by the Personnel Committee identify an Ethics Officer outside the organization in order to have an objective, non -vested perspective in researching a Code of Ethics issues. For example Kirkland and Bellevue contract with an Ethics Officer on an as needed basis who is only paid when a Code of Ethics issue needs to be investigated. Neither Kirkland nor Bellevue had incurred any expenses for outside review of a Code of Ethics violation. Councilmember Bloom noted the attachments are in the August 20, 2013 packet. She clarified in addition to Councilmembers, boards and commissions, the Code of Ethics would cover all elected officials including the Mayor. Kirkland and Bellevue's Codes of Ethics do not include a Mayor because they have a City Manager form of government. Councilmember Bloom expressed concern with including the requirement in 3.14.040 of Kirkland's policy related to financial disclosure for all officials. Officials are defined as all members of boards and commissions. Kirkland's policy excludes the Mayor and Council because elected officials must present Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 27, 2013 Page 12 Packet Page 867 of 895 all financial information on a yearly basis. She did not support requiring all members of boards and commissions to disclose their financial information and suggested that be excluded that from Edmonds' Code of Ethics; Bellevue's Code of Ethics does not have that requirement. She also suggested consideration be given to the complaint process and who handles complaints. For example Kirkland involves the Hearing Examiner and the City Council in the event of a complaint regarding a Councilmember. Councilmember Peterson agreed with Councilmember Bloom's concern about requiring members of boards and commissions to disclose financial information. He agreed with the Council considering a Code of Ethics in a proactive approach rather than a reactive approach. He supported the City having a Code of Ethics for elected officials and boards and commissions, anticipating a Code of Ethics would make the Council's work easier if an ethical issue arose. As Councilmember Buckshnis indicated, a Code of Ethics can be subjective, but responding to an ethical complaint would be even more subjective without a Code of Ethics. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas advised Snohomish County adopted a Code of Conduct for all boards and commissions and every commission and board member must acknowledge they have read and understand the Code of Conduct. She encouraged Councilmembers to review Snohomish County's Code of Conduct for elected and appointed officials. Councilmember Bloom asked whether Snohomish County's Code of Conduct was similar to Kirkland's. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas responded Snohomish County may be more thorough and straightforward. Council President Petso said she was pleased to see Kirkland's Code of Conduct in the packet and was interested in pursuing a Code of Conduct. She was concerned about the Code of Ethics and Ethics Officer and complaint enforcement. She feared a person who did not agree with an official's position on an issue could file an ethics complaint. She indicated she was unlikely to support a Code of Ethics that included a complaint process, an Ethics Officer and enforcement. She found Bellevue's Code of Ethics less objectionable; the statement of intent is to not to limit people who could serve on boards and commissions and elected officials. She agreed the financial disclosure in Kirkland's Code of Ethics would likely deter citizens from volunteering for a board or commission. Council President Petso noted there are other aspects, particularly in Kirkland's Code of Ethics that would deter citizens from volunteering to serve on a board or commission. There are events that do not constitute an ethics issue but might under a poorly drafted policy. For example when she was appointed to Council, a relative was serving on the Sister City Commission; that did not create an issue for her or him. It would have been unfortunate if the Code of Ethics forced one of them to resign their position. One of Kirkland's policies indicated it would be a conflict if a person serving on a board of commission lived in your household. In the example she provided, the person did live in her household for a period of time but it had no impact on his ability to serve on the Sister City Commission. Council President Petso relayed the City Attorney wanted the Council to discuss whether they were interested in developing a Code of Ethics for Edmonds because it will take him a great deal of time to develop it. Less legal time would be involved in drafting a Code of Conduct. Councilmember Buckshnis preferred the Bainbridge Island Code of Ethics. She agreed with not requiring boards and commissions to disclose financial information, commenting Councilmembers file with the Public Disclosure Commission. She liked the Code of Conduct although she feared it could be subjective. She recalled recent emotionally charged conversations with a fellow Councilmember that could have been interpreted as an argument. She preferred to start with a Code of Conduct using Snohomish County as an example. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 27, 2013 Page 13 Packet Page 868 of 895 Councilmember Bloom also liked Bainbridge Island's Code of Ethics policy the best. She recalled Councilmember Peterson's concern with Bainbridge Island's creation of an Ethics Board and the need for staff support for such a board. She supported adopting a Code of Ethics for the Council, boards and commissions. She explained an ethics violation was not related to conduct but rather conflicts of interest. She asked the City Attorney to describe an ethics violation. City Attorney Sharon Cates answered Code of Ethics are related to conflict of interest issues, not interpersonal interaction. Councilmember Bloom commented Bainbridge Island's policy allows citizens to ask questions about potential ethics violations and the Ethics Board decides whether to pursue a complaint. Bainbridge Island's policy also has consequences for bringing a frivolous or unsubstantiated complaint. She asked if that was typical of ethics policies. Ms. Cates answered a solid ethics code includes a process for determining whether a complaint is an ethics violation. Councilmember Bloom noted an ethics complaint is required to be notarized and to include information about the violation. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the Personnel Committee working on a Code of Conduct similar to Kirkland's. Councilmember Yamamoto agreed with the Committee continuing to consider a Code of Conduct and a Code of Ethics. He encouraged Councilmembers to submit suggestions/comments/concerns to the committee. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested scheduling further discussion on either the September 17 or 24 Council meetings. Council President Petso agreed it could be scheduled with the understanding it would be discussion only due to the absence of three Councilmembers. Councilmember Peterson suggested Councilmembers review Bainbridge Island's ethics policy on their website. He agreed there were good ideas in the policy; he was opposed to creating an Ethics Board. Councilmember Bloom agreed with first establishing a Code of Conduct but did not want to abandon the idea of a Code of Ethics. The Personnel Committee has discussed it at length and the community would like the City to have an ethics policy. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Peterson's concern with creating an Ethics Board. She preferred to use a professional Ethics Officer. 14. REPORT ON OUTSIDE BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS Councilmember Johnson reported on her participation on the review of arts and cultural aspects of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. She described efforts to gather input from the public including a survey at the recent concert in the park. There is also an online survey available. Councilmember Bloom reported the Tree Board discussed definitions in the Tree Code including hazardous trees, nuisance trees and trees. Councilmember Bloom reported the Council interviewed a new member for the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee tonight. Councilmember Bloom reported on her first meeting as the Council liaison to the Port of Edmonds liaison. The Commission discussed budget issues and promotional efforts. The Commission was also provided a project update including expansion of Anthony's Beach Cafe as well as the roof on Harbor Square building 2 which is $30,000 under budget and will last 20-30 years. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes August 27, 2013 Page 14 Packet Page 869 of 895 EXPECTATIONS AND CODE OF CONDUCT 1. Board members are expected to be respectful at all times. 2. Any Board member who is disrespectful, disruptive, divisive or dominating time in a meeting will be asked, by staff or the Board Chair, to cease and desist such behavior. Repeated behavior of this type can result in the recommended removal of the board member from the Board to the County Executive and County Council with a super majority vote of the Board. 3. Board members may choose to meet without staff present, however, such meetings are not considered official Board meetings and as such no County support will be provided. 4. No Board member shall give anyone the impression they are representing the Board without express written permission authorized by a simple majority vote of the Board. 5. Board members shall never give the public the impression they are representing the County, rather, Board members are advisory to the County. 6. Board members shall not interact with county contractors in the capacity of a Board member without approval by the Board. 7. Board members shall bring concerns or refer any individual who voices a concern related to contractual and/or staff issues to the Division Administrator or Director of Human Services as appropriate. 8. Board members shall refer any individual with questions regarding County policies, or resource management to the Division Administrator. This should not be construed as limiting board members access to elected officials. 9. Board members will strive to appreciate and respect differences in approach and point of view, whether from each other, the community, or staff. 10. The Board chair will ensure that all members have a fair, balanced and respectful opportunity to share their knowledge and perspectives. In the event that a Board member is unable to abide by the "Expectations and Code of Conduct" policies the Board, with a super majority vote, can recommend removal of the board member to the County Executive, for action by the County Council. Snohomish County Human Services Department Adopted August 2013 Packet Page 870 of 895 MINUTES PUBLIC SAFETY AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING Elected Officials Present: City Staff Present: Also Present: SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 Councilmember Bloom Councilmember Peterson Sandy Chase, City Clerk Ken Reidy The meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m. A. Proposed Code of Conduct for Elected Officials and Board Members. Councilmembers Bloom and Peterson discussed the Kirkland Code of Conduct, Section B from page 5 of the Bellevue Code of Ethics, and also the Snohomish County Code of Conduct. Comments included: • Preference to be very clear in distinguishing between what is an ethical violation and what is conduct related. • It would be more straight forward and cleaner to have a Code of Conduct as a standalone document. • Suggested combining portions of the Snohomish County Code and Section B from the Bellevue Code with the Kirkland Code. With regard to the Snohomish County Code of Conduct: • Councilmember Bloom suggested numbers 1, 2, 9 and 10 from the Snohomish County Code are relevant. • Councilmember Peterson suggested number 4 may also be relevant — "No Board member shall give anyone the impression they are representing the Board without express written permission authorized by a simple majority vote of the Board." • Councilmember Bloom commented that she has difficulty with any board voting by a simple majority to allow a member to speak on behalf of the entire board. Considerable discussion followed on this issue. Councilmember Bloom stated that if a board member is being asked to represent the opinion of the majority of the board/commission to the City Council, that makes sense; however, if they are being allowed to represent the opinion of the simple majority to outside organizations, she does not think that is appropriate. It was determined that the full City Council needs to discuss this issue. • Councilmember Peterson suggested adding the portion of number 4 that reads: No Board member should give the impression they are representing the entire board. Councilmember Bloom agreed. • It was agreed by both Councilmembers to include numbers 1, 2, the first half of 4, 9 and 10 of the Snohomish County Code. Also, include the statement at the Public Safety & Personnel Committee September 10, 2013 Page 1 of 4 Packet Page 871 of 895 end: "In the event that a Board member is unable to abide by the Code of Conduct policies, the Board, with a super majority vote, can recommend removal of the board member to the County EXeGutive Mayor, for action by the City Council." With regard to the Bellevue Code: • Retain numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 10 (eliminating 7, 8, 9 and 11). With regard to the Kirkland Code of Conduct: • It was agreed to also retain the first two paragraphs with the following change: remove the first sentence that states "The Code of Conduct is supplemental to the Kirkland Municipal Code and the Code of Ethics." B. Consideration of Council Comments Regarding Code of Ethics. Councilmember Bloom recalled comments previously received from Councilmembers related to disclosure of financial information. Councilmembers did not want board and commission members to have to disclose financial information. Councilmember Bloom also recalled that Councilmember Johnson did not want the policy to go "backwards." Councilmember Peterson stated that he would not want an Ethics Policy to affect previous Councilmembers who did not have an opportunity to vote on it. He would not want it to be retroactive. Councilmember Bloom referred to the Bellevue Code of Ethics under 1.E. where it states the complaint must be filed within two years of the date of the occurrence or occurrences alleged to constitute a violation of the Code of Ethics. Councilmember Peterson stated he reads this to mean moving forward; not retroactive. It was agreed by Councilmembers to ask the City Attorney to look at this. Councilmembers next discussed the complaint procedure. It was noted that Bellevue has an Ethics Officer and Kirkland uses a Hearing Examiner. Councilmember Peterson commented that he likes the idea of having an Ethics Officer, noting the Hearing Examiner deals mostly with land use issues. Councilmember Bloom commented that given the issues related to staff availability and Hearing Examiner availability, she believes the Code should be modeled after Bellevue (versus Kirkland). Councilmember Peterson agreed. Councilmembers agreed to use the Bellevue Code of Ethics (eliminate Section B that begins on page 5 — except for number 9. Number 9 deals with "Nepotism" and the committee would like this included in the Code of Ethics.) C. Discussion regarding Council attendance via speaker phone. Councilmember Peterson stated that in reviewing the sample procedures included in the packet, he thought the procedures from Spokane was the simplest and gives some latitude to the Council President and the council member who would be calling in. The other procedures seemed to be more detailed and included limiting the participation by phone to only one item. Public Safety & Personnel Committee September 10, 2013 Page 2 of 4 Packet Page 872 of 895 AM-6074 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: 30 Minutes Submitted For: Councilmembers Bloom and Peterson Department: City Council Committee. - Submitted By: Type: Information Subject Title Discussion: Edmonds City Code Chapter 2.10 Revisions. Recommendation Jana Spellman Information 12. Review the latest draft revisions to certain chapter 2.10 ECC, deliberate, and give additional direction to the City Attorney. Previous Council Action In 2012, during the confirmation of Rob Chave as acting Development Services Director, it became clear that chapter 2.10 ECC did not adequately address the confirmation of acting directors and whether the City Council sought to confirm such acting appointments. On March 6, 2012, the City Council requested that an amendment to chapter 2.10 ECC be sent to committee for review and discussion. The City Council did not give clear direction about the amendments it wanted to see in chapter 2.10 ECC. On March 13, 2012, the Planning, Parks and Public Works committee considered proposed revisions to chapter 2.10 ECC. The committee requested that the scope of the code update be extended beyond chapter 2.10 ECC. Additional revisions to a large portion of Title 2 were brought to the committee for review during the April and May 2012 committee meetings. The City Attorney is recommending that the revisions to Title 2 be considered in smaller chunks, perhaps one chapter at a time. Hence, only revisions to chapter 2.10 ECC has been included in the council packet. The City Attorney reviewed the minutes from the July 2013 PS&P committee and incorporated revisions where the committee had directed that revisions be made. August 19, 2013 Public Safety/Personnel Committee: The Committee discussed this topic (minutes attached). Narrative The attached revisions to chapter 2.10 ECC are intended as a guide to discussion of possible revisions to this chapter. One issue addressed in these revisions is the one that was initially in mind when the City Council referred this matter to committee: the acting director issue. The attached revisions represent one possible approach to the confirmation of acting directors, but the City Council has the authority to require confirmation even Packet Page 873 of 895 of acting directors if it chooses to do so. Attachments July 9, 2013 Public Safety/Personal Committee Minutes Aug 19 2013 Public Safety/Personal Committee Minutes Revisions to Chapter 2.10 ECC (2013-09-12) Inbox Reviewed By City Clerk Sandy Chase Mayor Dave Earling Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase Form Started By: Jana Spellman Final Approval Date: 09/13/2013 Form Review Date 09/12/2013 01:41 PM 09/13/2013 11:49 AM 09/13/2013 11:54 AM Started On: 08/29/2013 10:58 AM Packet Page 874 of 895 B. Reinstating Clerk Position Judge Fair explained that case loads continue to increase in the court. As a result of the increased work load and the fact that funds are available, he was requesting reinstating the clerk position in Municipal Court. Responding to questions, Judge Fair stated that funds are available in the non departmental budget (unallocated portion of the public defender contract). The committee members agreed to place approval of reinstating the clerk position on the City Council Consent Agenda. C. L & I Claims Management Mary Ann Hardie, Human Resources Manager, referred to the memo provided to the City Council on this topic. She explained that her department analyzed options related to managing the city's L & I claims. The analysis came down to looking at a third party to handle the claims. Based on the analysis, costs would be lower using a third party. There is a fee for the services that at a minimum would be a break even cost with the potential of significant savings. Councilmember Peterson asked if the use of a third party would have any effect on labor agreements. Ms. Hardie stated they are having the City Attorney's Office check on this issue, however, they do not believe it is a subject of bargaining. They also did an extensive reference check of the firm being considered and all cities and counties have been very pleased. Responding to further questions, Ms. Hardie stated the third party would provide as much training as needed to employees. Committee members were supportive of moving forward to the next step. A. Discussion: Edmonds City Code Chapter 2 Revisions Councilmember Bloom stated that she discussed a number of issues with the City Attorney today. The first issue is regarding the title of the Chapter "Confirmation and Duties of City Officers." She noted that there is not a definition of a City Officer. She made the assumption that a City Officer is a director level position or all the positions that include over site of code and have to be approved by Council. She believes "City Officer" needs to be defined. Councilmember Bloom also pointed out the Chapter includes reference to the Hearing Examiner, Executive Assistant to Council, and Mayor's Executive Assistant. She noted these positions are not City Officers. Councilmember Peterson suggested the title of the chapter could be changed from the reference to "City Officers" to referencing the positions that are included in the chapter. After discussion, the committee members agreed to request the City Attorney to bring back a definition of City Officer. Public Safety & Personnel Committee July 9, 2013 Page 2 of 5 Packet Page 875 of 895 Councilmember Bloom reported the City Attorney also suggested that the positions of City Clerk and City Engineer be included in this Chapter because they are called out in RCW. She agrees that it makes sense to include these positions as City Officers. Councilmember Peterson expressed wariness that this would add city staff that Council needs to confirm, which may cause more of the line between the legislative branch and the executive branch to get crossed. This would be going beyond confirming director positions. After discussion, the committee members agreed to bring to the City Council for discussion the addition of the City Clerk and City Engineer positions to Chapter 2. The next issue discussed by Councilmember Bloom was related to the Hearing Examiner being included in this Chapter. She questioned why this position is included. (Note: This issue was further discussed later in the meeting.) Next, Councilmember Bloom referred to language proposed for 2.10.010 A, and recommended the following changes: A. Whenever a vacancy occurs in one of the positions listed in this section, the city council may will review the specifications of that position and revise it as needed before acting to confirm a permanent appointment. She further recommended the last sentence be removed as she does not see the need for it. Councilmember Peterson agreed with changing "may" to "will." With regard to removing the last sentence, he questioned if the City Attorney may have included it as a protection. Next, Councilmember Bloom referred to language proposed for 2.10.010 D, and recommended the following changes: D. The mayor shall appoint, subject to council confirmation, the department direGter City Officer positions. The city shall have the following department direGter CitV Officer positions; With regard to the balance of Section D., she suggested the following: "The council shall interview the top three candidates for each position prior to the mayor's final selection, PROVIDED that the city council may waive the three - interview requirement by motion and may opt to interview as few as one two candidates for any vacant position. Councilmember Peterson disagreed commenting that if there is clearly only one qualified candidate it would be forcing the Mayor to have an unqualified candidate be interviewed, which would not be appropriate. It is always the council's option to require an additional candidate, but not always feasible. He believes the current language is fine. Councilmember Bloom stated this topic will be added as a discussion issue before the full council. (Note: This topic was discussed further in the meeting.) Public Safety & Personnel Committee July 9, 2013 Page 3 of 5 Packet Page 876 of 895 Next, Councilmember Bloom discussed 2.10.010 E., and proposed the following "Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter, the mayor shall have the authority to appoint, without city council confirmation, an acting director to any of the positions set forth in subsection D, above, PROVIDED that a search is initiated immediately to fill the vacancy, and there is budgetary authority to fill the position, AND any such acting directorship shall expire and be deemed vacant six months after the date of the appointment. The city council shall be given written notice about any such acting appointments including the effective date of the appointment. If, in that 6 month period of time, two or more suitable candidates have not been found for Council to interview, the mayor may request an extension of an additional 3 months to continue the search. Any extension of the 6 month initial "acting directorship" appointment shall be subject to city council confirmation." Council President Peterson stated he wants to be sure that if the Mayor finds only two qualified candidates that he is not able to move forward because he does not have three. Carrie Hite, Human Resources Reporting Director, joined the meeting at this time and suggested the committee consider two candidates versus 3, pointing out the recent experience in replacing positions. After discussion, the committee agreed to the language: two or more suitable candidates. Additional discussion was held regarding the Hearing Examiner being included in this Chapter. The committee concluded the City Attorney is to determine if there would be a conflict of interest if the Hearing Examiner is hired by the City Council. In addition, it was recommended to eliminate consideration of including the City Attorney under this chapter. Next, under 2.10.020, Assignment of Duties, Councilmember Bloom recommended: The city council shall define the functions, powers and duties of the city's directors and employees. The mayor s#a4 will direct, supervise, and be in charge of all directors and employees in the performance of their functions powers and duties. Councilmember Bloom also wanted language added that "all city officer job duties and job descriptions shall be reviewed and updated every five years." This would be limited to the City Officer job descriptions. Further, she would like language added that department directors will "assure compliance and accountability with federal, state and local laws and regulations." Councilmember Bloom stated that under 2.01.050, she would like to remove "or his or her designee." She explained there are certain matters such as legal determinations that should only be deferred in certain matters. Ms. Hite pointed out that there needs to be someone who can make decisions in the absence of the director. Public Safety & Personnel Committee July 9, 2013 Page 4 of 5 Packet Page 877 of 895 Councilmember Peterson suggested dropping reference to 2.10.050 in this section of the code. Councilmember Bloom next pointed out that 2.10.050 refers to both finance director and community services director, however the title of the section does not reflect this. Further, Councilmember Bloom believes the positions of Executive Assistant to the Council and the Mayor's Executive Assistant should not be part of this chapter as they are not City Officers. Committee members agreed to request the City Attorney to determine if these positions should be in a different section of the code. D. Discussion regarding Code of Ethics. Committee members discussed ethics policies from Bainbridge Island, Lynnwood and Kirkland. Councilmember Bloom referred to the policy from Bainbridge Island and would like to include the requirement for members to "disclose a conflict of interest" as a standing requirement at all city meetings for all officials. Councilmember Peterson commented that he believes the Council does a good job at this disclosure; however, having it on each agenda is a good reminder. Further discussion occurred related to policies, including the possible consideration of a Code of Ethics Officer. After discussion the committee agreed to forward to the next work session of the City Council the Bellevue and Kirkland ethics policies and the Kirkland Code of Conduct for discussion. The committee also recommended including the statement from Bainbridge Island related to disclosure of conflict of interest for all officials. After full Council discussion, direction can then be given to the City Attorney on how to proceed. Ms. Hite indicated she would bring back information on a Code of Ethics Officer. The meeting adjourned at 8:07 p.m. Public Safety & Personnel Committee July 9, 2013 Page 5 of 5 Packet Page 878 of 895 MINUTES PUBLIC SAFETY AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING SPECIAL MEETING AUGUST 19, 2013 Elected Officials Present: Councilmember Joan Bloom Councilmember Peterson Mayor Earling City Staff Present: Al Compaan, Police Chief Carrie Hite, Human Resources Reporting Director Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Jeannie Dines, Recorder The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. 1. Transfer and Hold Harmless Agreement for Police Dog Dash to Sergeant Josh McClure Assistant Chief Lawless explained Dash was purchased in 2006 with funding assistance from the Police Foundation. Dash is reaching the end of his working career and with Sergeant McClure's recent promotion, it is an appropriate time to retire Dash. In keeping with past practice, the proposal is to transfer Dash to Sergeant McClure for $1, along with a hold harmless agreement releasing the City of all liability. The agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney and approved as to form. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda 2. Continued Discussion Regarding Edmonds City Code Chapter 2 Revisions Mr. Taraday explained he used the minutes of the previous committee meeting to draft the proposed changes. If the minutes did not reflect consensus on an issue, the change was not incorporated into the Chapter 2 revisions. ,? innlnn Councilmember Bloom expressed concern with the proposed language that would allow the Council to waive the three interview requirement and opt to interview as few as one candidate. Following discussion regarding the number of candidates to be interviewed, Councilmember Bloom expressed support for the City Council interviewing the top three candidates and having the option to interview as few as two. Councilmember Peterson supported the City Council interviewing the top two and having the option to interview as few as one. Public Safety & Personnel Committee August 19, 2013 Page 1 of 4 Packet Page 879 of 895 Mr. Taraday proposed the following language for consideration by the full Council: "D. The mayor shall appoint ... The city council shall interview the top [two] [three] candidates for each position prior to the mayor's final selection, PROVIDED that the city council may waive the [two] [three] interview requirement by motion and may opt to interview as few as [one] [two] candidate(s) for any vacant position. The mayor's ..." "If in that six month period of time, the [two] [three] suitable candidates have not been..." Definition of City Officer Next, Councilmember Bloom suggested defining city officer. Mr. Taraday explained the scope of Chapter 2.10 is limited to confirmation and duties of appointive officers. The only definition included is appointive officer; many city officers (such as the City Attorney, Councilmembers, Mayor, Planning Board Members, etc.) are not subject to the confirmation provisions of this chapter. The draft Ethics Code may use either city officer or official but he found no meaningful difference between the two. Following discussion, Mr. Taraday agreed one term should be used consistently. He preferred "officer" to be consistent with State law. In instances where specificity is necessary, he suggested using an adjective such as elected or appointed. 2.10.010.E Councilmember Bloom expressed concern with allowing the Mayor to appoint an acting director without City Council confirmation and not filling the vacant position. Mr. Taraday referred to language in this section that requires the Council be informed. Ms. Hite referred to proposed language that limits an acting directorship to six months with potential for a three month extension. Mr. Taraday suggested eliminating "immediately," commenting it may not be appropriate to immediately conduct a search to fill a vacant position if the Mayor wants to propose reorganization or until the Council has completed their review of the specifications of the positions and revised as needed. Councilmember Bloom expressed concern with reorganizing whenever a director leaves. Mr. Taraday explained when a director position is vacated, it is prudent to consider whether to fill the position or reorganize the department. There is less legal risk in eliminating a position when it is vacant than when it is filled. He encouraged the Council to include flexibility in the code that contemplates various scenarios. Mayor Earling had concerns with rewriting a job description and conducting a search at the same time. He suggested a 30-60 day delay after a position is vacated. Councilmember Peterson agreed it would not be appropriate to conduct a search until the Council has completed their review/revision of the job descriptions and/or the Mayor has considered reorganization. He said 30 days was unlikely to be enough time. It was agreed Mr. Taraday will draft language eliminating "immediately" and providing options for a time period for the Mayor to propose reorganization to the Council at the time a director leaves. Public Safety & Personnel Committee August 19, 2013 Page 2 of 4 Packet Page 880 of 895 Section 2.10.050 Councilmember Bloom suggested not including "his/her designee" in the definition of a position. She preferred designation be addressed elsewhere in the code or the job description. Mr. Taraday recommended changing the title of 2.10.050 to "References." Section 2.10.060 Councilmember Bloom inquired about the intent of the last two sentences. Discussion followed. Ms. Hite pointed out the Council directly contracts with the Executive Assistant to Council. It was agreed to create a new Chapter 2.03, City Council, that would include the information in 2.10.060 regarding the Executive Assistant to Council. Section 2.10.070 It was agreed to move the language in 2.10.070 into the chapter regarding the Mayor. Review of Director Position Job Descriptions Councilmember Bloom suggested reviewing director positions at least every five years in addition to when a position is vacated. Following discussion, it was agreed to review director positions every three years in conjunction with nonrepresented salary surveys. Section 2.10.010.0 Committee members agreed with Mr. Taraday's recommendation to delete 2.10.010.C, as it is duplicative of language in 10.35.010.A. Action: Schedule for full Council. 3. Discussion Regarding Authorization to Recruit for Development Services Director Councilmember Bloom pointed out the current language in Chapter 2.10 requires the Council interview the top three candidates and does not allow appointment of a current employee. She questioned how Mayor Earling's proposal fit with Chapter 2.10. Councilmember Peterson pointed out the Mayor currently does not have budgetary authority to fill the position. He suggested the options are, 1) a budget amendment and utilize the existing process in Chapter 2.10, or 2) consider the position during 2014 budget deliberations when the revisions to Chapter 2.10 likely will have been finalized. Councilmember Bloom expressed concern that the Development Services Director position was not funded in the 2013 budget. She voiced her preference to begin recruitment for the position immediately, recognizing the selection process was likely to take several months. Mayor Earling reviewed his proposal to permanently appoint the existing Acting Development Services Director to the position. Mr. Chave would retain most of the Planning Manager responsibilities and Kernen Lien, who would be assigned a new job title, would assume some of the Planning Manager responsibilities along with his current job. This is a more financially prudent plan and Mr. Chave is very competent and has been doing an exemplary job. He suggested the Council could waive the current procedure. Public Safety & Personnel Committee August 19, 2013 Page 3 of 4 Packet Page 881 of 895 2.10.005 Definitions. Chapter 2.10 CONFIRMATION AND DUTIES OF CIT-Y-APPOINTIVE OFFICERS Sections: 2.10.010 Review of vacancies, appointment authority and cEonfirmation process 2.10.020 Assignment of duties. 2.10.030 Police chief. 2.10.040 Terms and extension of terms.Repeale 2.10.050 References 2.10.060 Executive eouneilassistant. 2.10.005 Definitions. A. Appointive officer[JTil. For the purposes of this chapter, "appointive officer" means the following city officers that are appointed by the mayor and subject to city council confirmation: all director -level positions in the city's adopted budget, including the police chief. B. �pecificationi[JT21. For the purposes of this chapter, "specifications" means the functions, powers, duties, compensation, and working conditions of the city's appointive officers. 2.10.010 Review of vacancies, appointment authority and Confirmati confirmation process. A. Periodically, when the city conducts a salary survey regarding its non -represented employees, and W4erwhenever a vacancy occurs in one of the positions listed in this seetienchapter, the city council will[JT31 review the specifications for the appointive officeref� positiono and revise it -them as needed before the vaeaney is filledacting to confirm a permanent appointment. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prevent the city council from reviewingsuch uch specifications at other times. The council's revising of a specification will not have any effect on a previously confirmed permanent appointment. Recruitment to fill a vacant appointive office may be postponed until after the city council acts to revise the specifications or determines them not to be in need of revision. B. The mayor or his/her designee will review all applications and determine the persons with the highest qualifications. Any city council member, upon request to the mayor, may review the applications received for the -a vacant position. C. , the positions of judge and heR er-. The hearing exam . er- may be r-emoved from his/her- position fo eause, as If, on occasion of a vacant appointive office, the mayor elects to propose a reorganization of the appointive offices which would alter the specifications of the vacant appointive office, he shall have sixty -days from the date of the vacancy to introduce a reorganization proposal to the city council along with any necessary Packet Page 882 of 895 accompanying budget amendment. If reorganization is proposed, recruitment to fill the vacant appointive office may be postponed until after the city council acts upon the reorganization proposal. , as speeifz a in RCW cn noc D. The mayor shall appoint, subject to council confirmation, the dir-eetor-, development services dir-eetor-, parks and recreation director-, public works di ra h,,,v,a dir-eetE appointive officers. The city council shall interview the top [two]fthreel candidates for each position prior to the mayor's final elee ttona][pointment, PROVIDED that the city council may waive the ftwolfthreel- interview requirement by motion and may opt to interview as few as [one candidatel [ two candidates] for any vacant appointive office. The mayor's appointments to all other employee positions shall not be subject to city council confirmationJOFd-.34�°O°T E. The mayor shall have the authority to appoint, without city council confirmation, an acting director to perform the functions and duties of a vacant appointive office, subject to the term limitations described in ECC 2.10.040.B, PROVIDED that there is budgetary authority to fill the position. The city council shall be given written notice about any such acting appointments including the effective date of the appointment. Acting directors shall be compensated pursuant to applicable ordinances and personnel policies regarding acting PAY-. F. The mayor shall begin recruitment of candidates to fill vacant appointive offices no later than thirty days after the latter of the two city council actions described in subsections A and C. above. 2.10.020 Assignment of duties. The city council shall define the functions, powers and duties of the city's directors and employees. The mayor shall direct, supervise, and be in charge of all directors and emnlovees in the berformance of their functions. bowers. and duties. except for emblovees hired pursuant to chapter 2.03 ECC. Ddepartment directors shall be responsible for carrying out all directives as assigned by the mayor, including, but not limited to, planning and directing the activities and staff in their respective assigned departments, supervising and evaluating the work processes and assigned staff, controlling the financial integrity of the assigneesdepartmental budget, and insuring the delivery of quality public services. All department directors shall serve at the pleasure of the mayor. [Or-d. 3279 §4, 19991. 2.10.030 Police chief. Pursuant to the authority of RCW 41.12.050(2), the position of police chief has been removed exempted from civil service. The policechZef shall be appointed by mayor- 2.10.040 Terms and extensions of terms A. Permanent appointive officers shall serve without a definite term. Packet Page 883 of 895 B. The authority to hold an appointive office on an acting basis (an acting directorship) shall expire and be deemed vacant six months after the date of the acting appointment. If, during that six month period, the administration has not been able to generate sufficient interest from suitable candidates to satisfy the citX council interview requirement (see subsection D, above), the mayor may request an extension of acting directorship authority from the city council, in increments of no more than six months at a time, to allow the recruiting_ process to continue. After the initial six-month term, each extension of the acting directorship shall be subject to city council confirmation. C. Both permanent and acting appointive officers shall be at -will positions serving at the pleasure of the mayor. 2.10.050 References to director- of ,,,,,,,,,,unity a,,.,,,l,,.,men . Wherever references are made in the Edmonds City Code, the Edmonds Community Development Code or any ordinance of the city to the dir-eeter- of community development director, said reference shall hereafter be construed to mean the development services ae�t director odesignee. [Or-d. 3279 § 1, 1999].Wherever references are made in the Edmonds City Code, the Edmonds Community Development Code, or any ordinance of the city to the administrative services director, said reference shall hereafter be construed to mean the finance director. With the exception of Title 3 of the Edmonds City Code, wherever references are made in the Edmonds City Code or Edmonds Community Development Code to the community services director, said references shall hereafter be construed to mean development services director, PROVIDED THAT references to the community services director in Titles 7, 9 and 18 and chapters 4.68 and 17.95 shall hereafter be construed to mean public works director. 2.10.060 Executive eouneil assistant to council4JT41 The executive eouneilassistant to council shall be a contract employee hired on an annual basis by the city council. The terms and conditions of employment for the executive ee fleil assistant to council as well as all benefits shall be governed by the provisions of the contract. Dependinc on the experience level of the particular person serving in this role, the prefix of "senior" may be added to the title. The contract shall provide for the delegation by the mayor of the direction of this individual to the city council president. In the event that the mayor elects in his or her discretion not to delegate that function, the cifcouncil reserves the right to immediately eliminate the position. [Or-d. 279 § 1 1999]. Packet Page 884 of 895 2.10.070 2.10.070 Mayor's executive assistaO[JT51. The position of mayor's executive assistant shall be an at -will position with the executive assistant serving at the pleasure of the mayor. The salary for the position is established by being set fet4h in a job deser-iption developed by the mayor- with the eoneuFfenee of the eity council. [Or-d. 3279 § 1, 1999]. (Revised ) Packet Page 885 of 895 2- AM-6114 City Council Meeting Meeting Date: 09/17/2013 Time: 15 Minutes Submitted By: Sandy Chase Department: City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Type: Information Information Subject Title Report on City Council Committee Meetings of September 10, 2013. Recommendation For information. Previous Council Action N/A Committee Action: 13. Narrative Copies of the meeting minutes are attached for the following City Council committee meetings: • 09-10-13 Finance Committee • 09-10-13 Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee • 09-10-13 Public Safety and Personnel Committee Attachments 09-10-13 Finance Committee Minutes 09-10-13 Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee 09-10-13 Public Safety and Personnel Committee Minutes Inbox Mayor Finalize for Agenda Form Started By: Sandy Chase Final Approval Date: 09/12/2013 Reviewed By Dave Earling Sandy Chase Form Review Date 09/12/2013 04:36 PM 09/12/2013 04:57 PM Started On: 09/12/2013 01:42 PM Packet Page 886 of 895 FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES September 10, 2013 Councilmembers Present Councilmember Fraley-Monillas Council President Petso Public Present Ron Wambolt Roger Hertrich Bruce Witenberg Finis Tupper Ken Reidv Staff Present Roger Neumaier, Finance Director Phil Williams, Public Works Director Stephen Clifton, Comm. Serv./Econ. Dev. Dir. Jeannie Dines, Recorder Councilmember Fraley-Monillas called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. She asked Council President Petso to participate due to Councilmember Yamamoto's absence. A. Authorization to contract with James G. Murphy to Sell Surplus City Vehicles Mr. Williams advised this is a police seizure vehicle, an 11 year old BMW SUV, and the approximate value is $6,000. Action: Schedule on Consent Agenda B. Recommendation for Department Presentations for Budget Workshop Mr. Neumaier reviewed the proposed schedule: October 1: Mayor's presentation of proposed 2014 City Budget. October 22: Department presentations (Court, City Clerk, Mayor's Office, Council, Human Resources, Economic Development, Finance & Information Services, Non - departmental, Development Services, Police) October 29: Department presentations (Parks, Public Works Utilities, Public Works Roads and Public Works Facilities Maintenance, ER&R and Engineering) November 4: Council Budget Public Hearing November 11: Council Budget Adoption Departments' presentations will address 2013 accomplishments, business challenges and uncertainties for the coming year, compare yearend projection actual expenditures to budget, what is different about their 2014 budget proposal and respond to Council questions. He will share the proposed department presentation schedule at a staff meeting tomorrow and make any necessary changes. Action: Schedule for full Council next week C. July 2013 Budgetary Financial Report Mr. Neumaier highlighted the following: • Property tax revenue is significantly higher compared to last year. This may be due to payment of delinquent property taxes when properties are sold. • Sales tax revenue is at 61 % and trending 7.5% over budget • Total General Fund revenue is at 61 % or $20.1 million YTD, compared to $18.8 million last year. Packet Page 887 of 895 09-10-13 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2 • In General Fund expenditures, Intergovernmental is at 71%. This is primarily due to department expenditures at the beginning of year. He anticipated a 2% under expenditure at yearend. • REET continues to perform very well. The yearend projection is $900,000 which is $250,000 over budget. Mr. Neumaier advised narratives will be provided in quarterly reports and will be more expansive than the second quarter report. Action: Schedule for full Council next week due to questions regarding the report format D. City Investments and County Investment Pool Mr. Neumaier explained the City's investments have been earning 0.1% in the State's Local Government Investment Program and a bank account. The Snohomish County Investment Pool has significantly outperformed the State pool. For example, in 2012 participants received 1 %, participants in the State pool received 0.17% and a 2 year Treasury Note received 0.25%. The primary objectives in the City's Investment Policy are, 1) safety, 2) liquidity, and 3) return on investment. He anticipated an increase in investment revenue of $80,000. He intended to keep a significant amount in the State's fund to ensure flexibility. The additional interest revenue is accrued by the fund where the money is located. He is authorized to make this change but wanted to notify the Council. Discussion followed regarding timeframe for investments and the process and timeframe to withdraw money from the State Pool and from the Snohomish County Pool. Action: Schedule for presentation by Mr. Neumaier to full Council E. Bond Counsel Contract for Edmonds Center for the Arts Contract Mr. Neumaier requested the Council authorize the City Attorney to agree to waive any potential conflict of interest pertaining to the Bond Counsel's occasional representation of the Edmonds Public Facilities District (PFD) and the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA) on unrelated matters. Once that authorization has occurred, City staff would move forward with a contract and would return to the Council with a proposed Interlocal modification agreement that addresses the strategies and issues summarized above. This would replace the current loan with a grant structure which is consistent with other cities. He described benefits of this strategy. The cost is up to $7,500 for bond counsel. In response to committee members questions, Mr. Neumaier explained extending the term does not solve the problem because the State requires interest be charged and the PFD still would need a source of revenue to repay the loan. The loan is problematic during PFD audits. The manner in which they would be modifying the Interlocal would be the bond counsel's recommendation. Discussion followed regarding the Task Force that has been discussing ways to cover the obligation, efforts to extend the PFD legislation for 15 years, bond counsel providing input to the Task Force, exploring other alternatives, investigating what other cities have done, obtaining tax and legal ownership advice from appropriate attorneys, projections in a spreadsheet provided at the Council retreat, and bond refinancing savings. Mr. Neumaier advised many of the questions that are being asked via email are very complex. He relayed the ECA is a jewel and the City Council should be proud of what they have achieved. His intent is to support that progress. Council President Petso advised a Task Force meeting is scheduled this Friday. Mr. Clifton said long term ownership also needs to be discussed by the Council and PFD. Mr. Neumaier will synthesize the questions he has received and answers he has provided as well as identify technical issues that he cannot fully respond to. He suggested establishing a date for the Task Packet Page 888 of 895 09-10-13 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3 Force to make a recommendation. He advised neither the ECA nor PFD asked for this; but it is an important issue to them. Action: Schedule for next month's Finance Committee meeting with a synthesis of questions/answers and an update from the Task Force. F. Public Comments Ken Reidy, Edmonds, encouraged Mr. Neumaier to respond to the emails he sent today. He agreed it was a very complicated situation and it was difficult for citizens and even staff to understand. He recalled former Finance Director Hunstock told him in 2012 that the PFD had paid back all their loans. There appears to be confusion about restricted funds and interfund loans. Everyone would benefit from a detailed explanation of the relationship between the PFD, ECA and the City. Mr. Neumaier anticipated his responses to Council questions will address Mr. Reidy's questions to the extent that they do not require detailed legal expertise. Bruce Witenberg, Edmonds, encouraged the Council to authorize the necessary funds to hire Foster Pepper and in particular Hugh Spitzer as bond counsel to provide the City the necessary assistance. He appreciated Mr. Neumaier's candor in saying he needs outside expertise in regard to this complex issue. Adjournment — The meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Packet Page 889 of 895 Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee Meeting September 10, 2013 Elected Officials Present: Council Member Kristiana Johnson Council Member Diane Buckshnis Staff Present: Phil Williams, Public Works Director Rob English, City Engineer Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Rob Chave, Acting Development Services Director Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Stephen Clifton, Community Services and Economic Development Director The committee convened at 6:30 p.m. A. Discussuion regarding citizen request to increase number of domestic chickens/hens allowed by Code. The PPP responded to a request to increase the number of domestic chickens allowed in the City of Edmonds by noting that this was an issue that underwent extensive review in 2009. Before entertaining a request to change the number of chickens allowed, there should be more expressed interest from the citizenry. B. Introduction to the Capital Facilities Plan (2014-2019) and the Capital Improvement Program (2014-2019) Mr. English reviewed the proposed 2013 schedule for presenting the CFP and CIP to the Planning Board and City Council. The committee members asked several questions of staff about both documents. ACTION: Item was presented for discussion only and no action was taken. C. Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #4 with David Evans & Associates for the 76t" Ave W @ 212t" St. SW Intersection Improvements project. Mr. English reviewed the scope of work and fee for the proposed supplemental agreement with David Evans & Associates. ACTION: Moved to Consent Agenda for approval. D. Continued discussion on developing a decision tree for Harbor Square deliberations. Staff presented draft decision trees developed for the key issues identified for the Harbor Square Master Plan: 1) Intensity/Type of Community, 2) Residential Development, and 3) Height. PPP indicated some suggested changes to the decision trees and expressed a need for clarification on some of the concepts identified in the decision tree. Staff will make changes to the decision tree and develop a written description\clarifications to accompany the decision trees. Revised decision trees and associated text will be presented to the PPP at the October PPP Committee meeting. Packet Page 890 of 895 Parks, Planning and Public Works Committee Minutes September 10, 2013 Page 2 E. Public Comments Public comments were received about the number of chickens allowed on residential property, traffic calming on Sound View Drive and an item that was on the consent agenda during the full City Council meeting. Comments were also received concerning the Capital Facilities Plan and the Capital Improvement Program. The meeting adjourned at 8:10 pm. Packet Page 891 of 895 MINUTES PUBLIC SAFETY AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING Elected Officials Present: City Staff Present: Also Present: SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 Councilmember Bloom Councilmember Peterson Sandy Chase, City Clerk Ken Reidy The meeting was called to order at 6:31 p.m. A. Proposed Code of Conduct for Elected Officials and Board Members. Councilmembers Bloom and Peterson discussed the Kirkland Code of Conduct, Section B from page 5 of the Bellevue Code of Ethics, and also the Snohomish County Code of Conduct. Comments included: • Preference to be very clear in distinguishing between what is an ethical violation and what is conduct related. • It would be more straight forward and cleaner to have a Code of Conduct as a standalone document. • Suggested combining portions of the Snohomish County Code and Section B from the Bellevue Code with the Kirkland Code. With regard to the Snohomish County Code of Conduct: • Councilmember Bloom suggested numbers 1, 2, 9 and 10 from the Snohomish County Code are relevant. • Councilmember Peterson suggested number 4 may also be relevant — "No Board member shall give anyone the impression they are representing the Board without express written permission authorized by a simple majority vote of the Board." • Councilmember Bloom commented that she has difficulty with any board voting by a simple majority to allow a member to speak on behalf of the entire board. Considerable discussion followed on this issue. Councilmember Bloom stated that if a board member is being asked to represent the opinion of the majority of the board/commission to the City Council, that makes sense; however, if they are being allowed to represent the opinion of the simple majority to outside organizations, she does not think that is appropriate. It was determined that the full City Council needs to discuss this issue. • Councilmember Peterson suggested adding the portion of number 4 that reads: No Board member should give the impression they are representing the entire board. Councilmember Bloom agreed. • It was agreed by both Councilmembers to include numbers 1, 2, the first half of 4, 9 and 10 of the Snohomish County Code. Also, include the statement at the Public Safety & Personnel Committee September 10, 2013 Page 1 of 4 Packet Page 892 of 895 end: "In the event that a Board member is unable to abide by the Code of Conduct policies, the Board, with a super majority vote, can recommend removal of the board member to the County EXeGutive Mayor, for action by the City Council." With regard to the Bellevue Code: • Retain numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 10 (eliminating 7, 8, 9 and 11). With regard to the Kirkland Code of Conduct: • It was agreed to also retain the first two paragraphs with the following change: remove the first sentence that states "The Code of Conduct is supplemental to the Kirkland Municipal Code and the Code of Ethics." B. Consideration of Council Comments Regarding Code of Ethics. Councilmember Bloom recalled comments previously received from Councilmembers related to disclosure of financial information. Councilmembers did not want board and commission members to have to disclose financial information. Councilmember Bloom also recalled that Councilmember Johnson did not want the policy to go "backwards." Councilmember Peterson stated that he would not want an Ethics Policy to affect previous Councilmembers who did not have an opportunity to vote on it. He would not want it to be retroactive. Councilmember Bloom referred to the Bellevue Code of Ethics under 1.E. where it states the complaint must be filed within two years of the date of the occurrence or occurrences alleged to constitute a violation of the Code of Ethics. Councilmember Peterson stated he reads this to mean moving forward; not retroactive. It was agreed by Councilmembers to ask the City Attorney to look at this. Councilmembers next discussed the complaint procedure. It was noted that Bellevue has an Ethics Officer and Kirkland uses a Hearing Examiner. Councilmember Peterson commented that he likes the idea of having an Ethics Officer, noting the Hearing Examiner deals mostly with land use issues. Councilmember Bloom commented that given the issues related to staff availability and Hearing Examiner availability, she believes the Code should be modeled after Bellevue (versus Kirkland). Councilmember Peterson agreed. Councilmembers agreed to use the Bellevue Code of Ethics (eliminate Section B that begins on page 5 — except for number 9. Number 9 deals with "Nepotism" and the committee would like this included in the Code of Ethics.) C. Discussion regarding Council attendance via speaker phone. Councilmember Peterson stated that in reviewing the sample procedures included in the packet, he thought the procedures from Spokane was the simplest and gives some latitude to the Council President and the council member who would be calling in. The other procedures seemed to be more detailed and included limiting the participation by phone to only one item. Public Safety & Personnel Committee September 10, 2013 Page 2 of 4 Packet Page 893 of 895 Councilmember Bloom expressed concern with limiting participation to one item noting that the Councilmember who is calling in needs to be able to hear such things as "Audience Comments" that may include comments that would be important to hear for the topic of interest. Councilmember Peterson agreed that the meeting should be attended as a whole, but pointed out in reality it may not be possible. Councilmember Peterson suggested under "Code of Conduct" to add "attendance for entire meetings; expected to show up on time and be available for the entire meeting." Councilmember Bloom commented that she prefers the Bothell policy. Councilmember Peterson agreed except recommended removing the limit to one agenda item. It was the recommendation of the Councilmembers to adopt the Bothell policy with the major change of not limiting to one agenda item and change the language that refers to City Manager form of government. Councilmember Bloom noted that the Bothell policy refers to "rare occasion." She suggested this be defined and would like it to be limited as much as possible. She suggested putting a cap on how many times it can happen. Councilmembers recommended converting the Bothell policy to an Edmonds policy; consider what "rare occasion" means to see if it would be desired to limit how many times someone can call in; if there is a public hearing associated, being able to listen to the entire public hearing is mandatory. D. Public Comments Ken Reidy, Edmonds, commented that he believes it is important that City Council members hear public comment before a vote is taken. He wanted to thank the committee for looking at the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct issues. As a citizen, he believes these issues need to be looked at more broadly than only boards, commissions and council. He believes it should apply to staff, Mayor and City Attorney. He has a hard time seeing how the Mayor can enforce a Code of Conduct because of his relationship with the staff. Mr. Reidy provided examples of why a Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics is important. He referred to an email from the City Attorney replying to an email from Jeannie McConnell telling her that there is no rush to respond to Mr. Reidy's request in the email. He read an email that was sent by Mayor Haakenson to Michael Plunkett dated October 29, 2009. The email was sent from a private email account by Gary Haakenson. A summary of the email includes: The email states that the Hearing Examiner was set to hear the Reidy/Thuesen case on November 4. The email references an executive session that was scheduled related to the case and also states a full discussion agenda item was scheduled by DJ to talk about the Reidy/Thuesen issue. The email includes the statements "If he persists and puts it on the agenda, you may want to rally three other votes to remove it from the agenda on Tuesday night if you think its wise. Just trying to keep you in the loop as to what he is doing. Why he is doing it is beyond me but if he's working with Reidy .... it must be to get at you somehow." Public Safety & Personnel Committee September 10, 2013 Page 3 of 4 Packet Page 894 of 895 Mr. Reidy explained that for months, he went through the process to get reconsideration of his issue. He showed up at the City Council Meeting thinking reconsideration of his issue would be on the agenda and, after coming out of executive session, the reconsideration was off the agenda. He was asking for reconsideration of the law. Mr. Reidy applauds the committee for addressing Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct. He noted this situation has affected his life immensely. There were no other public comments. Councilmember Bloom reopened the discussion related to Councilmember attendance via speaker phone. She referred to the Port Townsend policy and pointed out that no teleconference is allowed for a public hearing or quasi judicial proceeding. She would like to consider not allowing teleconferencing when a public hearing is involved. Councilmember Bloom referred to the need to clearly define what is "unusual" or "extraordinary circumstances," and suggested looking at the Port Townsend policy in conjunction with the Bothell policy. Councilmember Peterson pointed out the balance is "do we want more participation, or less participation?" Is hearing a council member's opinion and allowing them to meet their sworn duty more important? Does it out weigh their not being there? He would rather have another elected official's participation. Councilmember Bloom asked about the possibility of combining parts of 1 and 2 in the Port Townsend policy, and consider the possibility of teleconference participation only with the vote of the Council as a whole. Councilmember Peterson agreed. Councilmembers agreed with using the examples of extraordinary circumstance as indicated in the Port Townsend policy, HA., and take out "etc." Councilmembers agreed to consider the idea of the Council as a whole voting whether or not a Councilmember can participate in a vote related to a public hearing. The meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Public Safety & Personnel Committee September 10, 2013 Page 4 of 4 Packet Page 895 of 895