2013-10-22 City Council - Public Agenda-1520'4- o
90�
AGENDA
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
Council Chambers — Public Safety Complex
250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds
OCTOBER 22, 2013
6:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
1. (5 Minutes) Roll Call
2. (60 Minutes) Convene in executive session regarding areal estate matter per RCW 42.30.110(1)(b),
labor negotiations per RCW 42.30.140(4)(b), and potential litigation per RCW
42.30.110(1)(i).
RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION / FLAG SALUTE
3. (5 Minutes) Approval of Agenda
4. (5 Minutes) Approval of Consent Agenda Items
A. AM-6242 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 15, 2013.
B. AM-6237 Approval of claim checks #204872 through 4205011 dated October 17, 2013 for
$1,093,989.51 (replacement checks #204877 $7.00, $204879 $55.76, #204896 $8.00,
#204910 $100.00, #204911 $277.70, #204912 $236.53, #204913 $32.00, #204919
$46.52, #204925 $15.00, #204937 $200.00, #204940 $140.00, #204943 $42.00,
#204977 $43.20, #204978 $115.85, #204991 $75.00, #204992 $186.90, #204993
$1,854.09 & #205009 $130.00). Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #60521
through #60535 for $446,578.82, benefit checks #60536 through #60543 and wire
payments of $193,247.37 for the period October 1, 2013 through October 15, 2013.
C. AM-6231 Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Michelle Baillet and Guy Fineout
(amount undetermined), Christy Cufley, on behalf of Point Edwards appellants
($1,333.00), and Gary Reynolds ($500,000.00).
D. AM-6238 Community Services/Economic Development Department Quarterly Report - October,
2013.
Packet Page 1 of 133
5. Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*
*Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public
Hearings
6. (5 Minutes) Presentation: Snohomish County Grants $80,000 to Edmonds for City Park Project.
AM-6245
7. (5 Minutes) Mayor's presentation to Police Chief Al Compaan on his 35th Anniversary with the City.
AM-6227
8. (5 Minutes) National Arts & Humanities Month Proclamation
AM-6139
9. (15 Minutes) Annual Report - Public Defender
AM-6235
10. (15 Minutes) Annual Report - City Attorney
AM-6236
11. (10 Minutes) Appointment of Candidates to Edmonds Citizens' Tree Board
AM-6233
12. (2 Hours) Budget Work Session - Department presentations and public comment
AM-6243
13. (15 Minutes)
Report on outside Board and Committee meetings
14. (5 Minutes)
Mayor's Comments
15. (15 Minutes)
Council Comments
16. (15 Minutes)
Convene in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW
42.3 0.11 0(l)(i).
17. (5 Minutes) Reconvene in open session. Potential action as a result of meeting in executive session.
ADJOURN
Packet Page 2 of 133
AM-6242
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date:
10/22/2013
Time:
Consent
Submitted By:
Sandy Chase
Department:
City Clerk's Office
Review Committee:
Type:
Action
Committee Action:
Information
Subject Title
Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of October 15, 2013.
Recommendation
Review and approval.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Attached is a copy of the draft minutes.
10-15-13 Draft City Council Minutes
Inbox
Mayor
Finalize for Agenda
Form Started By: Sandy Chase
Final Approval Date: 10/17/2013
Attachments
Form Review
Reviewed By Date
Dave Earling 10/17/2013 03:45 PM
Sandy Chase 10/17/2013 03:50 PM
Started On: 10/17/2013 01:24 PM
4. A.
Packet Page 3 of 133
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES
October 15, 2013
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:18 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council
Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds.
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Dave Earling, Mayor
Lora Petso, Council President
Strom Peterson, Councilmember
Joan Bloom, Councilmember
Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT
Frank Yamamoto, Councilmember
1. ROLL CALL
STAFF PRESENT
Roger Neumaier, Finance Director
Kernen Lien, Senior Planner
Rob English, City Engineer
Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Mgr.
Jen Machuga, Planner
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Sandy Chase, City Clerk
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Linda Hynd, Deputy City Clerk
Jana Spellman, Senior Executive Council Asst.
Jeannie Dines, Recorder
City Clerk Sandy Chase called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of
Councilmember Yamamoto.
2. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING A REAL ESTATE MATTER PER RCW
42.30.110(1)(b).
At 6:20 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would not meet in executive session
because the incorrect RCW was cited on the agenda. The executive session will be rescheduled. He
declared a recess until the candidates for the Tree Board interviews arrived.
3. INTERVIEW CANDIDATES FOR POSSIBLE APPOINTMENT TO THE EDMONDS CITIZENS'
TREE BOARD.
Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 6:28 p.m. He announced the Tree Board
interviews would be held in the Jury Meeting room located in the Public Safety Complex. He stated the
interviews are open to the public and are expected to last approximately 30 minutes. Council President
Petso and Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas, Bloom, Peterson, Buckshnis and Peterson interviewed
candidates Rene Travis and Barbara Brooke Harrell.
The interviews concluded at 6:58 p.m. Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at
7:01 p.m. and led the flag salute.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER, DELETING ITEMS 13 and 14 WHICH
ARE NO LONGER NEEDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 1
Packet Page 4 of 133
5. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Bloom requested Item K be removed from the Consent Agenda and Council President
Petso requested Item A be removed.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO
APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows:
B. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FOR THE AUDIT ENTRANCE
CONFERENCE OF OCTOBER 8, 2013.
C. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #204754 THROUGH #204871 DATED OCTOBER 10,
2013 FOR $321,970.92. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL CHECK #60520 FOR $449.02.
D. AUTHORIZATION TO PAY CLAIMANT BRITTA HOLMBERG IN THE AMOUNT OF
$2,927.56.
E. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN 2013-2015 COORDINATED PREVENTION
GRANT AGREEMENT WITH DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY.
F. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO.
1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MACLEOD RECKORD,
PLLC, FOR CITY PARK REVITALIZATION.
G. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN AN INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT (IAA)
WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY FOR FUNDING THE REGIONAL
STORMWATER MONITORING PROGRAM.
H. QUARTERLY PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REPORT.
I. AWC INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AND RESOLUTION NO. 1300 FOR
PARTICIPATION IN AWC'S NEW SELF -FUNDED INSURANCE PROGRAMS.
J. AUGUST 2013 BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT.
ITEM A: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 8, 2013.
Council President Petso requested the motion at the top of page 4 be revised to read:
MOTION CARRIED 4-24, l5=L PETERSON VOTING NO.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO
APPROVE ITEM A AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
ITEM K: REFER PROPOSED STREET TREE MANAGEMENT POLICY TO CITIZEN'S TREE
BOARD.
Councilmember Bloom explained the Tree Board has no dedicated staff support. She requested Council
identify what staff member will prepare, schedule and present this item to the Tree Board. She suggested
Public Works provide support as Public Works Director Phil Williams presented this item to the Parks,
Planning & Public Works Committee. Council President Petso offered to contact Mr. Williams to request
a staff member make the presentation to the Tree Board. Mayor Earling suggested also involving Senior
Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 2
Packet Page 5 of 133
COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO APPROVE ITEM K, WITH PHIL WILLIAMS WORKING WITH JANA
SPELLMAN TO SCHEDULE THIS ITEM ON THE TREE BOARD'S AGENDA AND
ALLOCATE STAFF TO PRESENT TO THE TREE BOARD. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Excuse Councilmember Yamamoto
COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON,
TO EXCUSE COUNCILMEMBER YAMAMOTO FROM TONIGHT'S MEETING AND THE
PREVIOUS MEETING.
Councilmember Peterson explained Councilmember Yamamoto had heart surgery on September 12. He is
recovering and hopes to return to the Council in the next couple weeks.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Alvin Rutledge, Edmonds, relayed he spoke with Councilmember Yamamoto who said he would be
gone 2-3 more weeks. Councilmember Yamamoto looks forward to returning and has been following the
Council's work. Next, Mr. Rutledge thanked everyone who participated in the candidate forums and
encouraged voters to support their candidates.
Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, recalled last week he spoke to the Council to express his concerns with the
waterfront and the Mayor's proposal to dig a "ditch or big hole to create a highway system through the
middle of our town." Following that meeting, at the Finance Committee meeting, Mayor Earling made a
comment to him, "if you say ditches again I will come after you." Mr. Hertrich questioned what Mayor
Earling meant by come after him. He viewed Mayor Earling's comment as a threat, a way to stifle his free
speech and a violation of the City's code of conduct. He was concerned with the intent of Mayor
Earling's comments when Mayor Earling is the highest, most powerful person in the City with the entire
police force available to him. He invited Mayor Earling to offer a reasonable explanation for his
comment.
Mayor Earling responded he was affronted by Mr. Hertrich's constant use of the word ditch, referring to a
grant request to the State. Had Mr. Hertrich waited for him to continue their conversation, he would have
said he will be after Mr. Hertrich with the two -page narrative that was sent to State Senators. He pointed
out nowhere in the narrative is there any mention of a ditch, only an alternatives analysis for the at -grade
crossing and completion of the SR104 study. Mr. Hertrich responded that request was done outside of the
Council; it was Mayor Earling's intent to request funds, not the Council's. His interpretation of an open
cut trench was a ditch. He interpreted Mayor Earling's comment as a threat and intended to file
paperwork with the Police Department.
7. PROCLAMATION IN HONOR OF FRIENDS OF THE EDMONDS LIBRARY WEEK, OCTOBER
20-26,2013.
Mayor Earling read a proclamation declaring October 20 — 26, 2013 as Friends of the Edmonds Library
Week in Edmonds. He presented the proclamation to Lesly Kaplan, Managing Librarian, Edmonds
Library. Ms. Kaplan commented on the incredible work the Friends of the Edmonds Library do for the
library, raising thousands of dollars to help support programs as well as other projects. The Friends will
be celebrated at an open house at the library on Sunday, October 20, 2:00 — 3:30 p.m. The event will also
honor Edmonds Masons who donated ten bikes for kids who are reading. She also invited the public to
the Friends of the Edmonds Library book sale on Saturday, October 26 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 3
Packet Page 6 of 133
8. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MONTH - YWCA WEEK WITHOUT VIOLENCE PROCLAMATION.
Mayor Earling read a proclamation declaring October 2013 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month and
the third week of October as YWCA Week without Violence. He presented the proclamation to Mary
Ann Dillon, YWCA. On behalf of the YWCA of Seattle, King and Snohomish Counties and domestic
violence advocates and survivors, Ms. Dillon thanked the City for the proclamation. She explained
domestic violence is often a silent crime; issuing the proclamation helps give voice to a problem that
impacts I in 4 American women as well as many women and children in the community.
9. CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OF THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD'S DESIGN
APPROVAL OF POINT EDWARDS' BUILDING 10 TO BE LOCATED AT 50 PINE STREET
UNDER FILE PLN20130022. APPEAL NUMBERS APL20130005 - APL20130008.
Mayor Earling explained the purpose of this closed record hearing is for the City Council to address four
appeals of the Architectural Design Board's (ADB) decision, conditionally approving revisions of
Building 10 of the Point Edwards development which includes a multi -family residential building and
associated parking located at 50 Pine Street, Edmonds. He opened the closed record public hearing.
Mayor Earling described the hearing procedures. The City Clerk will make a recording of the
proceedings. This is a hearing on the appeals of Thomas Waggener who is represented by Attorney Doug
Purcell; the Town of Woodway who is represented by Woodway Mayor Carla Nichols and Attorney
Wayne Tanaka; Clair and Bill Widing and John and Laura Fleming; and David Inadomi representing
himself. It is not an open record hearing and there will be no opportunity during the closed record appeal
hearing for public testimony. Oral argument will be allowed from appellants and parties of record. The
parties of record include the applicant, any person who testified at the open record public hearing on the
application, and any person who individually submitted written comments regarding the application at the
open record public hearing. The City Clerk has a list of persons who meet the definition of a party of
record.
Mayor Earling explained the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine requires this hearing be fair in form,
substance and appearance. The hearing must not only be fair, it must also appear to be fair. He asked
whether any member of the decision -making body has engaged in communication with opponents or
proponents regarding the issues in this appeal outside the public hearing process. Councilmembers
Buckshnis, Bloom, Fraley-Monillas, Peterson, and Johnson stated they have had no outside
communication. Council President Petso reported two people attempted discussion, one via email and one
in person. In each case the person accepted her explanation that she could not discuss the matter with
them and there was no substantive communication. Mayor Earling advised he has had no outside
communication.
Mayor Earling asked if any member of the Council had a conflict of interest or believed he/she could not
consider and hear the application in a fair and objective manner. Council President Petso and
Councilmembers Johnson, Peterson and Bloom stated they have no conflicts. Councilmember Fraley-
Monillas stated she has friends and co-workers of 35 years who live at the site; she has not had
conversations with them regarding this issue and she believes she can be fair. Councilmember Buckshnis
reported she knows Doug Purcell but has no conflict. Mayor Earling reported he has no conflict.
Mayor Earling asked whether any audience member objected to his or any Councilmembers'
participation. There were no objections voiced. Mayor Earling advised all Councilmember and he would
participate in the hearing.
Mayor Earling relayed the Council has agreed on the following format for the closed record appeal:
1. Staff Introduction (15 minutes)
2. APL20130005 (Inadomi) Argument (10 minutes)
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 4
Packet Page 7 of 133
3. Applicant Response (10 minutes)
4. APL20130006 (Waggener et al.) Argument (10 minutes)
5. Applicant Response (10 minutes)
6. APL20130007 (Town of Woodway) Argument (10 minutes)
7. Applicant Response (10 minutes)
8. APL20130008 (Clair and Bill Widing and John and Laura Fleming) Argument (10 minutes)
9. Applicant Response (10 minutes)
10. Other Parties of Record Argument — 3 minutes each
11. Applicant response to other parties of record (equal to accumulated time of other parties of
record)
12. Council Questions and Deliberations
Mayor Earling advised the appellants may reserve some of their allotted time for rebuttal. He requested
they each inform him of the amount of time they wished to reserve prior to beginning their argument.
Mayor Earling explained the Council's jurisdiction in this closed record hearing is to determine whether
the decision of the ADB is clearly erroneous given the evidence of the record. The City Council shall
affirm, modify or reverse the decision of the ADB accordingly.
Staff Introduction
Senior Planner Kernen Lien explained Building 10 under consideration tonight is the last of the proposed
buildings at the Point Edwards development. The site was originally a tank farm. A master plan was
developed for the site that resulted in:
• Text Changes to the code: MP1 and MP2 zones (CDC-2002-37)
• Contract Rezone (R-2002-38)
o Any development at Point Edwards must be consistent with the MP1 and MP2 zones as well
as the approved master plan.
• Original Development Plan (ADB-2002-226) approved in 2003
o 295 multi -family residential units
• A number of amendments to original proposal
o Increase in total units to 350 (ADB-2005-49)
o Currently 261 units built at the site
Mr. Lien explained the design of Building 10 has undergone a number of changes over the years. He
displayed Building Sections of Building WE and 10W (ADB-2002-226). He explained there were no
elevation views of Building 10 at that time. In 2006 a proposal was made to amend Building 10 (ADB-
2006-97). He displayed a photo composite of the proposed Building 10 — Original Plan and Proposed
Building 10 — Modified Roof Plan. He explained the original Building 10 had a step down from the east
to the west side. The 2006 proposal leveled out the building and eliminated the step down. The 2006
proposal which included 69 multi -family units was never built.
Mr. Lien displayed a drawing of Building 10 west and east proposed in 2012 (PLN201200400). This
proposal was for 89 units. This building was the subject of the December 19, 2012 ADB public hearing;
that public hearing was continued. He displayed a drawing of Building 10 west and east proposed in 2013
(PLN20130022), the proposal approved by the ADB and the subject of the appeal. This proposal contains
85 units which is within the 350 approved units for the site.
Mr. Lien described the progression from PLN20120040 to PLN20130022.
• ADB Public Hearing December 19, 2012 (PLN20120040)
o Continued Public Hearing
o Referred to applicant for modifications
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 5
Packet Page 8 of 133
Design of Building 10 should be more consistent with other development approved and
constructed at Point Edwards under the Point Edwards Master Plan
Additional landscaping should be provided along the rockery or in the parking lot along
the south side of the surface parking lot
Applicant should take into consideration the following design elements present in the
existing Point Edwards buildings:
- Residential fenestration
- Broad overhangs
- More human scale
- Distinction between floor to floor height
- Pacific NW elements and materials
Applicant must submit samples of proposed materials
Following the December 19, 2013 public hearing, procedural issues arose in regard to SEPA. Under the
original proposal (2002), the City issued a Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance (MDNS) on
May 23, 2003. The MDNS was adopted again in 2005 with the increase of units from 295 to 350. The
concern raised with SEPA was in regard to a specific condition in the MDNS, a $22,000 fee collected by
the City for a signalization project at the Pine Street/SR-104 intersection. The need for the signalization
project was not triggered by development of Point Edwards but was intended to be the development's fair
share of the signalization project triggered by the Edmonds Crossing project. The Edmonds Crossing
project was put on hold and the signalization project did not proceed. As that specific condition was in the
SEPA determination, the City felt SEPA should be redone for the project.
Redoing SEPA raised procedural concerns. SEPA appeals are heard by the Hearing Examiner; there are
provisions against two open record public hearings. A public hearing before the ADB had begun before
this SEPA concern arose; if SEPA was issued and appealed, there was a risk of two open record public
hearings. The applicant decided to withdraw their application, PLN20120040, and submit a new
application, PLN20130022. The City did a new SEPA analysis which included a traffic impact analysis
and issued a Determination of Non Significance (DNS) on April 12, 2013. That SEPA determination was
not appealed.
Although PLN20130022 is technically a new application, the applicant responded to the conditions the
ADB presented in December 2012. He displayed drawings of Building 10 west and east views. He
reviewed Building 10 approval:
• Staff found the building consistent with the Zoning Code
• ADB found Building 10 to be consistent with design standards in the Comprehensive Plan and
the Building Code and approved the design of Building 10 at their May 15, 2013 meeting
• Three appeals of the ADB approval were received
• On July 7, 2013 the Council remanded the decision back to ADB to enter Findings and
Conclusions
o Staff prepared a first draft and made it available to all other parties of record for comment.
The applicant and one appellant group added to the draft Findings and Conclusions
• ADB reviewed and adopted Findings and Conclusions on August 7, 2013
• Four appeals of the ADB approval have been received
APL20130005 (Inadomi) Ar ug ment
David Inadomi, Woodway, requested time for rebuttal. Mayor Earling offered to inform him when he
reached eight minutes. Mr. Inadomi clarified for the record a concern about asking for late information on
completed issues, noting much of it stems from the procedural faux pas of remanding the decision to the
ADB for preparation of Findings and Conclusions to support their decision. To the statement that he did
not attend a public hearing in 2005 where the number of units increased to 350; he agreed he was unaware
of that public hearing. It would have been premature to object because a decision had not been made to
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 6
Packet Page 9 of 133
put a large or majority percentage of units in one building rather than dispersing them among buildings
yet to be constructed. He also did not speak at the ADB's meeting last year, the first available opportunity
regarding the current proposal. To the comment that he has never discussed noise and lighting issues for
Building 10, he referred to his testimony contained in the transcript of the May 15, 2013 ADB meeting.
Dr. Inadomi commented when considering a project like Building 10, basic fundamental concepts/values
need to be satisfied: does the construction represent the essence of the design objectives for the City of
Edmonds, is it in complete compliance with all the current codes, and is the ultimate goal worth the 100%
opposition by local residents who will be most affected by the construction? If the answer to these
questions is yes, the next phase of building should proceed. If not, the areas in question need to be
identified and perhaps modified so that it is palatable to a majority rather than overwhelmingly
unfavorable. He urged the Council to consider that when making their final decision.
Applicant Response
Rick Gifford, 23901 Edmonds Way, land use attorney representing Edmonds Pine Street LLC,
explained he was unaware the Bates stamped portion of the record had been updated. An initial Bates
stamped record was issued in June with the first appeals; an expanded version (640 pages) was issued that
added 118 pages of materials that arose as a result of the remand to the ADB and the ADB's adoption of
Findings and Conclusions. When he prepared written materials that were submitted on October 4 and 11,
2013, he cited to the previous Bates stamped record and his citations are off by 118 pages. He noted the
transcript of the May 15, 2013 ADB meeting, the July 2, 2013 City Council meeting minutes, the ADB's
August 7, 2013 meeting minutes and a memo from Mr. Lien to the Council dated September 30, 2013 are
also part of the record but not included in the Bates stamped record. His references tonight will be to the
640 page version of the Bates stamped record.
Mr. Gifford introduced John Goodman, Principal, Edmonds Pine Street LLC; and Architects Joe Kolmer
and Myer Harrell, Weber Thomas. Mr. Gifford acknowledged this project has received a great deal of
scrutiny as it should because it is a major contribution, the last building in the overall Point Edwards
community. Unfortunately the process has been somewhat erratic and unpredictable and issues have made
it more prolonged and confusing than necessary. He referred the Council to the record where these issues
are addressed extensively in writing and oral testimony. He expressed concern that the process that is to
be open, direct, clear and certain has not been in this case for a variety of reasons.
To the issue of the technicality of a new application versus the reality, he displayed page 578, a drawing
comparing the northwest view of the December 2012 design and the May 2013 design, a revised design in
response to direction provided by the ADB. He displayed page 579, a drawing comparing the northeast
view of the December 2012 and May 2013 designs. He also displayed page 580, a drawing comparing the
southwest view of the December 2012 and May 2013 designs. He noted 2-3 levels were visible from this
perspective, more stories visible on the downslope similar to other buildings in Point Edwards. He
explained the modified design that the ADB reviewed in May was responsive to the ADB's December
mandate. He displayed page 356, minutes of the ADB's December 19, 2012 meeting, and the ADB's
motion to continue the public hearing and direct the applicant to modify the design proposal for Building
10. He noted they could have chosen not to modify their proposal but in the interest of proceeding with
the project, they commenced design review in accordance with the ADB's directives to be more
consistent with the other development at Point Edwards, and add landscaping in the surface parking lot,
and design and architectural elements such as fenestration, modulation, and articulation that are typical
for major project design.
He explained this is a continuing design evolution that began over a decade ago with the original Point
Edwards approval. He displayed page 612, a building cross-section of Building 10E and 1OW, four stories
visible on the lower slope and 2 — 2'/2 stories visible on the upper. He displayed page 611, off street
parking plan from the 2003 ADB approval, explaining this view illustrates the master plan and projected
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 7
Packet Page 10 of 133
building for the project. This view illustrates a large angled building along Pine Street with surface
parking behind, a building footprint very similar to the current plan. This view also illustrates the other
Point Edwards buildings stair -stepping or terracing down the slope. All the buildings in this view were
level roofed; all nine buildings constructed in Point Edwards to date are level -roofed with modulation just
as Building 10 is proposed.
Mr. Gifford displayed page 169, a cross section of the current building, four floors on one wing the same
as the original and five floors on the other wing, an additional story visible on the downslope and 2 — 3
stories visible on the up slope similar to the original and the 2006 design. He displayed page 573, the
ADB Approved Concept (2006), noting there was a separate review process to secure the ADB's approval
of a level roof. That was the sole focus of that proceeding and this view was the result of that process, a
large hinged building with western and eastern wings. The eastern wing has five visible stories on the
downslope, four visible stories on the upslope, a significant larger building footprint but similar in
concept, shape and features, with surface parking behind the building.
Mr. Gifford recognized Dr. Inadomi's desire for a smaller building with fewer living units, fewer
occupants, and fewer parking spaces because it would be less impactful to his property. However, those
are not the issues on review. The issue of tonight's closed record review is the validity of the ADB's
assessment of the project and whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support its decisions.
In the code those decisions are entitled to substantial deference. There have been plans since 2002-2003
for a large multi -family building with surface parking on this property. He referenced pages 317, 322, and
148. When Dr. Inadomi purchased his residence in 2004, Point Edwards had been approved and site work
was underway. He referred to Dr. Inadomi's comment in the materials he submitted that they did not
expect a building this size, pointing out a similar building was approved in concept in 2003, and in 2006 a
larger but similar building in overall mass and footprint, five stories in the east wing and four stories in
the west wing was approved. He recognized this design needed to stand on its own and could not
piggyback on earlier designs.
Mr. Gifford referred to environmental considerations such as view, noise and other impacts, explaining
any structure would have some impact on view. No one, without express legal entitlement, is entitled by
law to an unobstructed view. He acknowledged the building will be visible in the foreground in the view
corridor as would any aboveground structure on this property. For the SEPA review, a new SEPA
checklist was prepared that addressed view, noise, light and glare issues. Staff did not comment on those
disclosures nor was the City's DNA determination appealed. Dr. Inadomi was not involved in earlier
proceedings but became involved in 2012. He summarized Dr. Inadomi has not submitted any verifiable
or valid evidence and there is nothing in the record to substantiate his views or call into question the
determinations made by the ADB.
Appellant Rebuttal
Dr. Inadomi responded he was aware there would be a building on the property when he purchased his
home in 2004. The plan at that time was considerably fewer units, 30 something, and 20 something
parking stalls, which would create less noise and traffic. He acknowledged he did not participate in the
SEPA appeal but spoke about noise and lighting issues at the ADB's May 15, 2013 hearing. He felt his
objections and concerns were thought of as a nuisance or inconsequential. He hoped the Council took his
points to heart when forming their final decision.
APL20130006 (Waggener et. al) Araument
Doug Purcell, attorney representing Waggener et al., asked to reserve 2 minutes for rebuttal. Mr.
Purcell commented it was clear there were a lot of aspects of Building 10 that the public and residents of
Point Edwards had not expected. The principal issue goes back to 2002 with the approval of the contract
rezone that required among other things that the property conform generally to the MP1 zone and
residential building be designed to fit into the terraced hillside. The project was described as a stair -step
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 8
Packet Page 11 of 133
down the hill so as not to intrude significantly into the view corridor. The applicant described the
buildings as two stories with a third story of covered parking. That description encompassed all buildings
including Building 10. Nine buildings were constructed, leaving the apex of the property undeveloped.
Instead of the terraced look, the proposal is a monolithic building, much larger than any other buildings
on the site at the top of the hillside where it will be intrusive into view corridors throughout the Edmonds
area.
Mr. Purcell relayed Mr. Waggener's appeal raises a number of issues and specific items in the Findings
and Conclusions. His objections have the same basic issue, the ADB is required to find that this building
conforms or fits in and is consistent with the other development in Point Edwards. It is their position that
the conclusions of law and findings of fact reached by the ADB with regard to that issue is clearly
erroneous because when looking at the original concept compared to the structure as currently proposed,
it is out of scale and out of scale at the most significant point of the property. Among other issues, this
building sites 25% of the units on 10% of the property. It increases the surface parking spaces from 20
something to 74. This is the only five -story building on Point Edwards, five stories at the top of the
property.
Mr. Purcell questioned how the 21/2 pages of deliberations that occurred at the ADB's May 15, 2013
hearing were converted to 26 pages of Findings and Conclusions. He opined the Findings and
Conclusions were not the presentation of the ADB but of staff and the applicant. Although the Council
directed the ADB to prepare Findings and Conclusions, it is their position the creation of Findings and
Conclusions after the fact was inappropriate.
Mr. Purcell relayed the ADB found there was appropriate roof modulation to allow an additional 5 feet of
height for a total height of 40 feet. While there is modulation that may represent breakup of the
monolithic aspects of the building as viewed when walking down Pine Street, as viewed from the bowl
and downtown Edmonds it will appear to be a flat roofline creating a monolithic building rather than a
modulated roofline. It is clear from the ADB's deliberations that the provisions of roof modulation that
allow increased height were never considered.
Applicant Response
Mr. Gifford responded the assertion is that the ADB did not follow staff's recommendations regarding the
design criteria for human scale and design consistency, as well as questions about modulated roof
allowance and parking, that the ADB generally did not consider the urban design guidelines and that staff
and the ADB are wrong about the application of City height standards. He noted the heavy reliance on
what staff says with regard to design matters is misplaced; staff's primary role in this process is to assess
zoning matters, bulk and use standards, parking requirements, setbacks, etc. Staff has done that and has
consistently found this proposal fully in compliance with all zoning, bulk and use standards.
He displayed a page with code excerpts, explaining Chapter 20.11.020.B states in zoning matters staff's
determination is to receive substantial deference. He referred to Chapter 20.11.020.A which states the
ADB makes other design assessments with advisory input from staff. It is the discretion and expertise of
the ADB in light of the record and applicable standards and guidelines that are controlling. Chapter
20.11.020.A states the ADB has an obligation to provide specific direction and guidance to applicants in
design matters. This is what the Urban Design Guidelines are designed to do. He believed that was what
the ADB was attempting to do in good faith in December when it provided the applicant four design
modification directives. The design guidelines are the primary sources of that direction and the design
criteria in Chapter 20.11 states the tie breaker is the 75 Urban Design Guidelines in the Comprehensive
Plan. The ADB has entered Findings and Conclusions with regard to each of the guidelines. Utilizing a
draft prepared by staff with input from parties of record, in an open meeting the ADB considered,
deliberated and made a number of changes to ensure consistency. The ADB unanimously approved the
Findings and Conclusions and Decision consistent with its May 15, 2013 decision.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 9
Packet Page 12 of 133
To the issue of guidance, help, clarity and early detection of issues, Mr. Gifford explained that was
fundamental to the City's development review process, the underpinning of the pre -application process.
This applicant went through two pre -application meetings with staff in May and September 2012. The
fundamental components of mass, height, footprint, and setback for this building were the same. The
purpose of the pre -application meeting as stated in City bulletin 58 is to provide early detection, to
identify major issues for the benefit of the applicant, to help the applicant in the process. The applicant
did not receive that type of input until much later in the process, days before the second public hearing
was held. He suggested the role of the ADB, the Council, the code and the Comprehensive Plan in
providing reasonable, predictable, clear direction and guidance to applicants be considered.
Mr. Gifford referred to Chapter 20.06.006.C, the appellant has the burden of proof to demonstrate there
was clear error and that there is no significant evidence in the record supporting the ADB's decision. He
relayed his written materials contain numerous citations to the record of supporting evidence, testimony
and facts. He referred to the 33 item list Mr. Waggener submitted with no support or documentation,
declaring 33 of the ADB's findings erroneous without any citation to the record. Conversely, he cited
multiple incidences in the record where evidence supports 32 of the 33 ADB's findings; the 33`d finding is
not applicable. Staff has repeatedly confirmed zoning; the ADB has repeatedly reviewed and extensively
confirmed design elements. Staff respected its advisory role with regard to modulated roof design and
deferred entirely to the ADB. The ADB was presented with considerable evidence of modulated design
and the ADB approved it. He referred to pages 188, 190, 577, 592 and 609.
Mr. Gifford noted in other areas staff offered shifting opinions over the course of the process. Opinions
were not expressed in the two pre -application meetings held in May and September 2012 and were not
expressed prior to the formal application in November prior to the December hearing and were not
addressed in the first staff report to the ADB in December. The idea of stepping a building laterally west
to east, a concept never before done in Point Edwards, was not presented until 6 days before the second
hearing. Staff indicated the way to address that would be to lop a floor off the east wing of the building.
By the time of the hearing, staff rethought that and referred to that idea as simplistic and said although it
may be necessary to step the building, it may not be necessary to remove the entire floor. That adjustment
in staff's thinking was not particularly clear and provided no guidance to the ADB or the applicant and
has never been fully explained other than clarified in a memo to Council in September; no alternatives
were suggested. The ADB heard staff's change in position and rejected any further structural change to
the building.
In that process, in addition to confirming conformance with all the urban design guidelines and design
criteria, the ADB acknowledged and applauded the applicant for their responsiveness to the ADB's
December direction. The ADB affirmed that design and in its Findings and Conclusions, affirmed the
design guidelines were met as well as affirmed staff's determinations with regard to zoning. Mr. Gifford
summarized all those aspects of the ADB's decision are entitled to substantial deference by the Council
upon review.
With regard to terracing, he referred to page 292 that addresses buildings being terraced or stepped down
the hillside which has been done at Point Edwards. He displayed an excerpt from the Point Edwards
Master Plan that speaks to terracing the buildings down the hillside. He displayed a drawing that
illustrates Building 10 continues the design of stepping buildings down the hill.
Appellant Rebuttal
Mr. Purcell referred to the ADB's findings related to the Urban Design Guidelines. The principal
difference on this property is the importance of its integration into the Point Edwards development. He
referred to page 0210 regarding conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, approved Point
Edwards Master Plan and land use regulations that were prepared by the applicant. Paragraph B.6 states
Point Edwards Condominiums are designed to conform to the unique site constraints imposed by
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 10
Packet Page 13 of 133
topography, soil conditions, subsurface geology, natural vegetation and drainage. Individual structures are
typically 2 stories of frame construction over a 1-storysubgrade concrete parking structure with a single
row of units fronting the garage structure on the lowest (downhill) level. Typical 3-story buildings only
show 1 to 2 story facades at the uphill face. Mr. Purcell summarized that describes the current
development at Point Edwards; this building will be very different if allowed to be constructed as
proposed.
APL20130007 (Town of Woodway) Argument
Carla Nichols, Mayor, Town of Woodway, asked to retain two minutes for rebuttal. She said this issue
is about community and neighbors. Many Woodway residents have relayed their concerns about this
proposal to her and other Councilmembers, not just the four appellants. She urged the Council to be fair
to Edmonds, Woodway and the future and to overturn approval of the project.
Wayne Tanaka, attorney representing Town of Woodway, commented Edmonds has been a leader in
design review, establishing the ADB and design review criteria. Although good design is pleasing
aesthetically, it also promotes property values and quality of life. From reviewing the record, it is clear the
ADB initially did not undertake a systematic analysis of the design criteria in developing their initial
decision. The Council was correct in remanding the matter to the ADB to enter specific findings.
However, the Council should have allowed the ADB to modify or reverse its decision. Questions arose
when the ADB reviewed the specific criteria, but the ADB felt constrained by the Council's action to
justify their decision through findings of fact. The design guidelines focus on, 1) how a building looks
such as fenestration, breaking up long lines, etc., and 2) how the building fits with its surroundings. He
relayed they had no complaint with the way the building looks, but it does not fit in that location in terms
of height and bulk, it is too big and out of scale for that location and that neighborhood. It is bigger than
any other building in Point Edwards and due to its unique location and specific topography on the high
point, it sticks out like a sore thumb.
Mr. Tanaka relayed the Council has delegated this appellate role to itself; that is appropriate due to the
element of judgment in applying the criteria. He agreed with Mr. Gifford that staff's role was compliance
with the code as far as setback requirements, etc. and their decision should be upheld unless it was clearly
in error. The design elements that the ADB considers are a matter of judgment and the appellants', staff's,
applicant's judgments are not controlling; the Council reflects the community's values and how design
fits with the surroundings. He cited design objective D.Lb that requires a project to maintain the smaller
scale and character of historic Edmonds, commenting the intent appears to be to have all building that are
subject to ADB review reflect what already exists and to be consistent. He suggested the Council imagine
this building in downtown Edmonds, concluding that it does not fit.
Mr. Tanaka recognized a building would be constructed on the property. He asked the Council to exercise
its discretion and judgment, does this building fit in with its surroundings and does it maintain the smaller
scale and character of historic Edmonds? He relayed Woodway's concern about the placement of
streetlamps, relaying their belief that there would be consistency in the design. Due to glare, he requested
the Council add a condition requiring streetlamps be consistent
Applicant Response
Mr. Gifford referred to slide 29, a list of record citations to the 33 Findings and Conclusions alleged by
the Waggener's appeal to be clearly erroneous, for which Mr. Waggener provided no record citations. He
agreed Point Edwards and Edmonds want to be good neighbors and appreciated Woodway's concerns.
The code and design guidelines focus on fairness to applicants. In Chapter 20.11 the City is required to
provide helpful guidance and direction to applicants. The City's pre -application process is designed to
provide early warning to identify major issues to help the applicant through the process. The fairest way
to proceed is always to uniformly and consistently apply the written standards of the code, the
Comprehensive Plan and the Master Plan. The ADB found this project fully compliant with the Urban
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 11
Packet Page 14 of 133
Design Guidelines, the code design criteria, fully compliant with all relevant zoning provisions, and fully
compliant with the Master Plan. He expressed surprise that Mr. Tanaka was all but asking the Council to
substitute its judgment for the ADB's decision; that does not meet the burden of proof for determining the
ADB's decision as clearly erroneous. The ADB has been given the legal authority, the discretion to
review these issues and make these decisions. There was no authority for the Council to substitute its
judgment for the ADB in the name of community interest.
Mr. Gifford said the applicant is very sensitive to the community's concerns; this will be a high quality
project with very high quality units. As the ADB determined, it fully conforms to the City's design
standards and zoning requirements and is consistent with the master plan based on the evidence in the
record and applying the appropriate legal standards. In response to Mr. Tanaka's reference to design
criteria D. Lb, he noted that is one criterion out of 75. He referenced citations to D. Lb on pages 152, 574,
575, 576, 178 and pages 15, 16, and 28 of the ADB's verbatim transcript. He read from the ADB's
Findings and Conclusions with regard to conformance with D.Lb, the proposed building is compatible
with the surrounding Point Edwards project of which it is a part, under the approved Point Edwards
Master Plan. The project and this site are outside the historic downtown waterfront core of Edmonds.
While a substantial structure like the other nine residential buildings in the approved development, its
mass is modulated and softened by color and material choices, vertical and horizontal breaks and
variations in the building fagade, varied roof features and step backs. The building is consistent with the
Point Edwards project as a whole, conforms with all zoning bulk and use standards, and is not
incompatible with scale and character of the City of Edmonds as a whole. The design of the building
draws on elements and patterns found in Point Edwards itself. He pointed out that finding also references
criterion C.8.d.
Mr. Gifford referred to slide 25, an excerpt from the verbatim transcript of the ADB's May 15, 2013
meeting shortly before the ADB voted 5-1 to approve the project, Board Member Guenther's comment
that it was inappropriate to start talking about pulling the floor out of the east side, that the ADB was to
talk about the consistency of the building with the rest of the site, discussion about landscaping and
design materials and viewing a sample board, that the materials, the scale, the articulation of the face are
more appropriate with the rest of the site and Board Member Guenther's conclusion that the design
elements were right on. Mr. Gifford pointed out the ADB looked to the design guidelines and recognized
the decision about a building was not limited to one or two aspects; all aspects are considered including
the modulation of the fagade, articulation of the building, setback, architectural fenestration, color and
material variations, and modulated roof design with hip roof forms that correspond to Dr. Inadomi's
house upslope from the project. He noted the entire top floor is stepped back. All those elements were
taken into account in the original design and revised at the request and direction of the ADB in December
to produce a consistent and coherent design that fits with the surrounding environment as the ADB found.
Although theories could be constructed after the fact and requests made to substitute judgment and
community goals, citizens, the applicant, the ADB, staff and the Council are constricted by the standards
established in the code, design criteria and guidelines in the Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Urban
Design Guidelines. The ADB considered those and approved the project; that decision is what the Council
must evaluate. There is no valid basis on the record or the law, certainly not the Findings and Conclusions
that were approved by the ADB, for any finding that this is a clearly erroneous decision, no basis for
changing or overturning the ADB's decision. The ADB's decision should stand on the facts and the law.
Appellant Rebuttal
Mr. Tanaka responded the Town appreciated that the developer thought they had worked through all the
issues with staff and the ADB and felt somewhat blindsided. A public process has been established for
citizens to provide their opinions about what staff, the applicant and the ADB have done. If the Council
wanted only the staff and the ADB's information and suggestions to be controlling, the public should not
be allowed to offer testimony. The existing process allows the public to be part of the process.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 12
Packet Page 15 of 133
Mr. Tanaka clarified he was not suggesting the Council substitute its judgment; the Council must find that
the ADB was clearly erroneous in order to overturn their decision. Clearly erroneous means the Council is
firmly convinced that a mistake has been made. These are subjective judgments to some extent; it is not
the building height or if it meets the setback, it is the Council's, ADB's and the public's judgment
regarding how the building fits with the surrounding neighborhood. That is stated in different ways in
various criteria, criteria D. Lb is the most appropriate. Although Mr. Gifford provided citations, Mr.
Tanaka pointed out there was no description of how the building meets the smaller scale of historic
Edmonds.
APL20130008 (Clair and Bill Widing and John and Laura Fleming) Ar ug ment
John Fleming, 216 Chinook Road, Woodway, asked to reserve 2 minutes for rebuttal. Mr. Fleming
raised the question, how easy is it to determine fact versus opinion? This discussion is about the ADB's
Findings and Conclusions related to whether Building 10 meets the design standards in the code. He
referred to the outcry from the neighborhood that disagrees with the ADB's findings. The applicant has
stated the appellant's responses are based on opinions not proof or fact. One of the design objectives is to
retain a connection with the scale and character of the City of Edmonds through the use of similar
materials, proportions, forms, masses and building elements; how does one prove that? He referred to
criteria D. Lb, maintain the smaller scale and character of historic Edmonds. He questioned how "smaller
scale and character" could be defined and proved. The design standards and objectives are guidelines
intended to preserve the character, look and feel of the community; how can the ADB's findings prove
that Building 10 meets these standards or not? At some level it is always opinion and judgment.
Mr. Fleming relayed the intent when the design objectives were written was to maintain the character of
the community; that determination is based on opinion. He asked if the Council felt Building 10
maintained the character and quaint nature of the community. He questioned if this would set a precedent
in the community and whether the Council wanted to start that precedent by approving this building. He
asked if Councilmembers ran for Council to open this door; he feared future developers would use
Building 10 as evidence of what has been approved in the past to get larger buildings approved in the
future. In his opinion, Building 10 does not meet the objective of retaining the scale and character of the
City. He envisioned the Council wanted their beliefs to count, that they were a voice for the people and
wanted to leave a legacy. He questioned whether they wanted this building to be part of their legacy,
whether Building 10 fit the scale and character of Edmonds, and did it meet the design objectives in the
code. He encouraged the Council to listen to the people they represent and overturn the ADB's decision
which is in fact their opinion.
Applicant Response
Mr. Gifford responded no matter how much someone wanted to come up with their own standards, a
community, political or legacy standard, that was not at issue. The issue is the code, 75 Urban Design
Guidelines and the Point Edwards Master Plan. There is also the applicant's reasonable investment
expectations in considering the code and design guidelines, prior approvals, the history of the site and
doing their best to interact with staff and the ADB over the past 19 months of process. All the issues
related to size, scale, overall mass, building area, dimensional elements have been established since May
2012. Not until a few days before the last hearing did the applicant receive input from staff that further
structural changes needed to be made. The Council's job is a closed record review of a decision that is
entitled to substantial deference on zoning matters as well as design matters. The appellants have the
burden of proof. He referred to Mr. Fleming's comments about nuancing and opinions, and agreed these
were judgment calls but as part of a holistic review as anticipated by Chapter 20.11, a consideration of all
relevant elements. In the end the ADB is assigned the responsibility to reasonably exercise its discretion
in light of those standards.
Mr. Gifford expressed concern that the Council was being asked to substitute its judgment rather than
looking closely at the ADB's decision, looking at the entire record and the arguments presented and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 13
Packet Page 16 of 133
determining if there was evidence in the record to support the decision. They have made repeated
citations to the record; little citation to the record been made by any of the appellants. He urged the
Council to look at the record and their numerous citations to the record. To the comment about 21/2 pages
of ADB deliberation, he pointed out that is not at issue; the entire record, over 700 pages of material and
testimony over months of process is what is under consideration. That is what the ADB considered and
that is what the Council must consider; it cannot be thrown open to political nuance and judgment,
community issues or neighborhood opposition. He urged Council to apply the law to the facts, consider
the record, consider the ADB's multiple reviews and the laborious process and affirm the ADB's
decision.
Mr. Gifford commented this was a difficult process, not knowing what issues will be raised until this
evening. To the comment that there are no 5 story buildings in the Edmonds bowl, he referred to several
examples including 220 Railroad Avenue, the senior center, has five residential floors; the Commodore
Condominiums at 546 Alder Street has 5 stories; and the El Capitan Condominium at 200 James Street
has 5 stories. Whether there are other five story buildings in Edmonds is not the issue, the issue is this
building, this site, and applying the design guidelines and code to this site which staff, the ADB, and the
applicant have done. On that basis, he asked that the Council affirm the ADB's decision, approving this
project with specified conditions.
Appellant Rebuttal
Mr. Fleming responded looking at the law and the design objectives and the spirit of the law, Building 10
does not fit into the community, does not fit into Point Edwards, and does not fit into Edmonds regardless
of the number of stories that it or other buildings in the bowl have. He doubted the room would be full of
people and opinions if it did. Because Building 10 does not meet the design objectives, he requested the
ADB's decision be reversed and that the Council consider all the opinions in the room. He doubted
anyone viewing the existing development at Point Edwards would conclude the proposed buildings fit
with the community.
Mayor Earling explained City Attorney Jeff Taraday is representing staff in this matter; Carol Morris is
the designated attorney for the Council.
Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. He cautioned the audience not to lobby elected officials during the
break.
Other Parties of Record Argument — 3 minutes each
George Fotheringham, 65 Pine Street, Edmonds, commented the ADB board members who made this
decision are volunteers appointed by the Council, not elected officials. While acting in good faith, the
ADB made mistakes; they did not consider the massive proposed building, used an inappropriate standard
to conclude there was adequate parking, did not resolve the modulated roof exemption question, and did
not issue initial findings and conclusions. Written findings and conclusions were issued following the
ADB's August 7, 2013 meeting. These findings were essentially written by the City Attorney and 44% of
the language in the final document was written by the developer. The final version of the Findings and
Conclusions is 25 pages long, much more than the ADB's less than 3 page discussion in the August 7,
2013 minutes. This process has been unfair and not neutral or transparent. Over 100 citizens cleared their
calendars to attend the July 2, 2013 hearing and many spent time and effort preparing 3 minute
statements. At that meeting, it appeared the Council's legal counsel, Ms. Morris, had engaged in advance
communication with the developer and Councilmembers and had not notified any of the appellants she
would recommend the matter be remanded. She did not solicit input from appellants on July 2, 2013 and
simply asserted the appellants were not prejudice. He disagreed with that dismissive statement.
Further those who signed the petition were not told prior to signing that they would be prevented from
addressing the Council tonight. That decision was not announced until September 26, 2013. Mr.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 14
Packet Page 17 of 133
Fotheringham questioned how the Council could call itself representative when members of the governing
body deliberately refused to read emails and petitions from 700 citizens, all of which were in opposition
to the current proposal and many of whom do not reside at Point Edwards. It was disheartening to receive
a memo from the City's legal counsel sent via email at 12:21 p.m. today that implies the appellants have
not met their burden of proof, before the Council has heard from the appellants or had an opportunity to
deliberate. Unlike the ADB, the Council is elected and directly accountable to citizens, charged with
following the law, ensuring a fair review process, a process that is fair and appears fair. He requested the
Council ensure what is left of the process be impartial.
Nancy Jacobs, 65 Pine Street, offered several overhead slides and handouts. Attorney Carol Morris
inquired if they were part of the record; Ms. Jacobs advised they were not part of the record although the
information they contained was in the record. Ms. Morris advised the administrative record was closed
and no new information could be introduced in a closed record hearing. Mayor Earling explained the
Council must make their decision based on the information contained in the record. Ms. Jacobs opined
that was prejudicial.
Ms. Jacobs explained she lives across the street from proposed Building 10. She purchased her
condominium in early 2012; before she purchased, she was shown a scale model of the Point Edwards
Master Plan as then represented by the developer. The scale model shows a three story building and a 28
stall surface parking lot. The developer put the scale model in his onsite sales center in 2003. Dr. Inadomi
has the right to be concerned because according to the scale model when standing on the loop road below
the proposed building, the top of the hill and Dr. Inadomi's house are visible and the view is not
obstructed. She pointed out people bought condominiums based on this scale model that showed the
harmonious composition of the entire development and how the proposed building fit into it. The scale
model has never changed despite the design changes that have occurred in 2003, 2006, and 2012; it still
shows the building as 3 stories, a step down of the east wing of the building, setback from Pine Street
minimizing the building's visual mass, and one level of underground parking.
Ms. Jacobs said the developer's current proposal is a radical departure from what he represented to
prospective purchasers and residents. They trusted him to keep his word. The developer now wants
approval of a standalone building that bears little resemblance to the scale model or the existing
development and he argues that the City has changed the rules and dragged him through this process.
Several Point Edwards owners have indicated they would not have purchased their units had they seen a
model depicting the more massive five story building. In spring 2013, the developer placed a brown paper
bag over the portion of the scale model where the proposed building was located, after he had sold 100%
of the units in the other 9 buildings. She urged the Council to reject the current proposal.
Tom Mesaros, 51 Pine Street, Edmonds, commented all of the 9 buildings in the existing Point
Edwards community covered by the Master Plan have resident parking below the building with 1-2
spaces allotted for each unit. The ADB has now approved plans to construct a building that places 25% of
the allowed units on 10% of the site and utilizes a massive surface parking area. No other residential
structure in the Point Edwards community has exterior parking. Of the 24 acres on the Point Edwards site
covered by the Master Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, approximately 1/a of the total units will be
jammed on 10% of the land. The number of units in existing buildings range from 22 to 34; the proposed
10''' building has 85 units. None of this fits with the Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan for the Point
Edwards community. He questioned whether the prior request to increase the number of units would have
been approved if the Council had been aware that the number of units would be concentrated in one
massive structure rather than equally distributed over the ten buildings. Existing units average 1400
square feet, compared to the average 900 square feet of units in the proposed building. The traffic and
parking demands will be significantly greater than those presented by the current buildings and the result
will be detrimental. The Master Plan called for buildings to be setback into the hillside in order to blend
with the topography. The proposed structure obliterates the hillside rather than blending with it. He
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 15
Packet Page 18 of 133
envisioned visitors to Edmonds 5-7 years in the future looking at the development, asking what were they
thinking when they built that building? He requested the Council correct the grave failure of the ADB to
thoroughly and properly review this proposal.
Kevin O'Keefe, Point Edwards, Edmonds, commented he was shown the model when he put down
earnest money on his unit in spring 2005. The model was gorgeous, built into the topography, everything
flowed and the lines of view were open. While he was moving in 2006, he was not told the developer had
applied for more units in Building 10. While living there, no one knew more units had been requested; he
was unaware until his barber told him last year. The developer worked with the ADB to add units without
the residents' knowledge. He pointed out the design for fewer units was gorgeous, fit Edmonds and
Woodway, and fit his comprehension of what Point Edwards was going to look like. Had he known that a
gigantic, monstrous apartment building would be approved in 2013, he would not have purchased a unit
in Point Edwards. Many of his neighbors have expressed the same sentiment. He urged the Council to
reconsider the ADB's decision, not just for his and his neighbor's sake but for Edmonds in the future. He
summarized Edmonds is a jewel but with buildings like this it will turn into Ballard or Kirkland.
Lisa Elstrom-Bauer, Woodway, commented she moved into Woodway in 2000 before the project was
developed on the site. She recalled when a wastewater treatment plant was proposed on the site and being
happy when a condominium project was proposed, especially the design that was proposed at that time.
She appreciated how the buildings have been constructed on the site to date. The process needs to include
input from the community regarding heights, how the buildings look, and how they fit into the
community. This is a special community, located on Puget Sound with trees, small buildings and
communities visible from the Puget Sound corridor. A cityscape of large buildings the size of Building 10
is not visible until one reaches Seattle. She feared this mistake may not be realized for several years; what
is visible now when looking up at the hillside from the waterfront is a well -planned building development
site with neighbors, trees, nature and a community atmosphere. She summarized it would be detrimental
to the community to have Building 10 constructed as currently proposed and she urged the Council to
reverse the decision.
Applicant Response to Other Parties of Record
Mr. Gifford said although he appreciated the effort the Council has made to include everyone who wants
to comment on this project, he did not believe it was proper to allow non -appellant parties of record who
had the opportunity to participate in the proceedings previously on multiple occasions but elected not to
file appeals an opportunity to present testimony tonight. This matter is on appeal; four appeals were filed,
the applicant has responded to those appeals. He recommended the Council not consider that testimony.
Mr. Gifford said many of the comments are not germane to the proceedings. In accordance with the code,
the ADB is charged with the responsibility of reviewing evidence in the record and making a decision on
design. Staff is charged with the responsibility and authority to make determinations on zoning matters,
parking, setbacks, height, and bulk which they have done. The decisions by staff and the ADB are entitled
to substantial deference as expressly stated in the code. The Council's review and decision is on the
record and only the record; the record consists of evidence and facts that were presented to the ADB and
legal issues presented during the hearing. This is not a case where it is appropriate for the Council to
substitute its judgment for the provisions in the code and the Comprehensive Plan. The opinions that have
been expressed and now reiterated by non -appellant parties of record are along the lines of there should
be different rules. If the application of the code provisions and the design guidelines produces results the
Council or citizens do not like, citizens can vote the Council out or the Council can amend the code or
revise the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Gifford referred to the fundamental principles of the design review process, the pre -application
process, to provide guidance to the applicant, clarity, consistency, certainty and predictability in the
process. The code makes it staff's express duty to provide helpful guidance and direction to applicants
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 16
Packet Page 19 of 133
and to consistently apply it to development approvals. They tried hard to respond to the ADB's direction,
have met all requirements even some they objected to and felt were inappropriate such as the SEPA
review. They have done everything possible to maintain the process, not confuse citizens, and provide
opportunity for comment. The ADB in hearing the evidence, reviewing the proposal and applying the law,
made a decision to approve the project, finding it compliant, suitable and consistent with the
surroundings. He requested the Council review this matter as required in consideration of the record and
in light of the applicable law, the City's code and design guidelines and affirm the ADB's decision.
Council Questions
Mayor Earling explained the Council may now ask clarifying questions of applicants, parties of record,
and appellants and there is opportunity for rebuttal by staff and the parties. The City Council shall not
request information outside the administrative record. The Council may decide they do not need to ask
additional questions, close the oral argument portion of the closed record hearing and move into
deliberations.
Councilmember Buckshnis advised she did not receive the email around noon today that was mentioned
by one of the appellants. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said he did not send an email today. Ms. Morris
referred to an email she sent yesterday that was forwarded to everyone this afternoon. Mr. Tanaka said the
Town of Woodway did not receive that email. Mr. Lien explained he sent an email this afternoon to
Mayor Nichols, Thomas Waggener, Doug Purcell, the Widings, Dr. Inadomi, the Council and the
applicant.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed the original Point Edwards Master Plan with 419 units was not part
of the record. In 2005 the ADB increased the proposed number of units from 295 to 350. She asked about
the ADB's authority to make that change. Mr. Lien answered the original Point Edwards Master Plan is
part of the record and included 419 units. The 2003 approval was for 295 units. Portions of the ADB's
approval have returned to the ADB over the years. As different iterations went back to the ADB, they
were considered minor modifications of the previous approval and did not require public hearings or
notice. That may be why residents were not aware of some of the updates to the plan. The 2005 increase
to 350 units was done as part of a building modification to Building 5. The City considered that request
and adopted the original MDNS stating the proposal was still consistent and was less than the 419 units in
the Master Plan.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented 350 units on 10 lots would be approximately 35 units per lot. She
asked whether most of the buildings had been constructed by 2005 when the change from 295 units to
350 units was requested. Mr. Lien assumed the remaining buildings had not yet been constructed since
Building 5 was under consideration at that time. He assumed the buildings were constructed in sequence.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed in December 2012 the number of parking stalls increased from 27 to
74. Mr. Lien answered the increase in the number of surface parking stalls was largely due to the increase
in the number of units in the proposed building. The 2006 building had 69 units. The proposed building
now has 85 units. Additional parking spaces are required to comply with the City's parking standards.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the ADB's Findings and Conclusions were prepared by staff and all
parties and did not go back to the ADB for review. Mr. Taraday explained the Findings and Conclusions
before the Council on appeal were reviewed by the ADB and ultimately approved. He acknowledged the
members of the ADB did not draft the Findings and Conclusions; they were drafted by a group that
included himself, Mr. Lien, Mr. Gifford and all parties of record were invited to submit proposed
revisions. That is commonly how Findings and Conclusions are prepared, even in a court of law; the
judge does not draft Findings and Conclusions. Typically the judge asks the parties to draft Findings and
Conclusions for his subsequent review. The parties exchange drafts; if they agree, one draft is sent to the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 17
Packet Page 20 of 133
judge for approval, if they disagree, multiple drafts are sent to the judge for consideration and the judge
combines them.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed it appeared the applicant pulled the application and resubmitted but
did not start the process over. She asked whether that constituted an illegal process. Mr. Taraday
answered the applicant voluntarily withdrew their application. Having done that, strictly, legally and
technically speaking they are starting from scratch with their 2013 application. While the applicant refers
to the 2012 hearing for historical context, the 2012 hearing is not part of this application. From a process
standpoint, the City has done everything necessary to comply with State law.
Council President Petso referred to Mr. Purcell's comment that the 2002 documents describe a project
that fits into the hillside, 2 stories with parking underneath. She asked for reference to a page number in
the record. Mr. Purcell referenced page 0210, the City's design analysis from the original approval. Mr.
Gifford said that is not the City's design analysis, they are materials supplied by the applicant outlining
conformance with the then -applicable design guidelines.
Council President Petso asked for clarification that the 2013 application is before the Council, not the
2012 design. Ms. Morris agreed. Council President Petso asked if likewise the 2003 and 2006 designs
were not before the Council. Ms. Morris agreed.
Council President Petso referred to comments that the ADB's vote was unanimous but the ADB minutes
(page 4, August 7, 2013) do not reflect a vote on the motion to adopt the Findings, Conclusions and
Decision. Mr. Lien offered to listen to the audio recording to determine whether a vote was taken.
Council President Petso referred to the comment that the Council's decision could establish a precedent
with regard to what constitutes a modulated roof and massing. She asked if the Council's decision could
be subsequently used by a developer to show the modulation or massing that was allowed. Ms. Morris
answered if the facts were similar enough it could be used as a precedent. The Council also has the ability
to change the code.
Council President Petso referred to a statement by Mr. Tanaka that the ADB did not initially review the
design criteria and asked for a citation to the record. Mr. Tanaka clarified he stated the ADB did not go
through each design criteria like they did the second time.
Mr. Lien advised he listened to the audio of the August 7, 2013 ADB meeting; the ADB voted 6-0 to
approve the Findings, Conclusions and Decision. The vote is approximately 43 minutes into the audio of
the meeting.
Council President Petso asked whether the pre -application process was binding in any way if something
arises after the pre -application process. Ms. Morris responded it absolutely is not binding.
Council President Petso asked how far outside the bounds of judicial notice the Council can stretch. For
example could she visit a local grocery store in an effort to visualize the size of a 74 space parking lot?
Ms. Morris answered the Council should be looking at the appeals and determining whether or not the
appellants have demonstrated that the ADB's decision was clearly erroneous and then determine whether
any of the appellants have submitted references to the record to demonstrate/substantiate their allegations.
The Council is not charged with doing any new empirical studies to determine whether the design criteria
have been met. Council President Petso asked for clarification of Ms. Morris' comments, whether she was
saying the size of the surface parking lot did not relate to the appeal. Ms. Morris explained to determine
whether any of the appeals can be sustained by the Council, the Council needs to determine whether the
appellants have submitted any evidence to support the fact that the ADB's decision was clearly erroneous
as to that point. Mr. Tanaka relayed the Town of Woodway does not believe that advice is correct.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 18
Packet Page 21 of 133
Councilmember Buckshnis asked Mr. Tanaka to explain why he did not believe the advice was correct.
Mr. Tanaka responded the advice is too limiting and therefore incorrect. While true the Council needs to
determine whether or not the appellants, who have the burden of proof, have met that burden of proof and
whether there are sufficient facts in the record to support it, that does not mean that the Council cannot
engage in some analysis of what a 74 space parking lot looks like.
In regard to the burden of the appellants, Ms. Morris said her memo quoted from the code and case law. If
Mr. Tanaka's comment was related to Council President Petso's question about empirical analysis, she
agreed some type of analysis would need to be done to determine whether information in the record was
correct. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the fact that the parking is surface parking and not
underground is a difference. She concluded Ms. Morris and Mr. Tanaka were saying the same thing but in
a different way.
Mr. Gifford relayed it has been confirmed by staff that the City has no ability to require underground
parking. This building meets and exceeds the parking requirements. The only issues they have been asked
to consider are additional landscaping, trellises, screening, and buffering which were done and satisfied
the ADB. The Council is limited to the record; in his legal opinion going outside the record, visiting other
sites, would violate legal requirements.
Councilmember Bloom referred to Mr. Lien's comment that the City considered the 2005 increase to 350
units and inquired about the process to review the increase in units. Mr. Lien advised he did not include
the 2005 ADB file in the record; he included the 2005 adoption of the original MDNS which is in the
record at page 365. There is discussion in the staff report with regard to Building 5 and the ADB's
approval of additional units which is still within the 419 units allowed by the Master Plan for the site.
Councilmember Bloom asked if all the other buildings were completed when the applicant requested an
increase from 295 units to 350 which was approved by the ADB. Mr. Lien was unsure of the exact
sequence of building construction but believed they were constructed in order one through ten. Since
Building 5 was under consideration at the time, he assumed Buildings 1 - 4 were under construction and
potentially the additional units could have been distributed over the remaining 5-6 buildings.
Councilmember Bloom questioned why the ADB increased the number of units, anticipating that was the
reason Building 10 was taller when the other buildings were only 3 stories. Mr. Lien answered the plan
that drives development is the Point Edwards Master Plan. He referred to the Point Edwards Master Plan
on page 290, an attachment to the contract rezone. The Master Plan states at a permitted density of 2,400
square feet per dwelling units, the maximum number of dwelling units that would be allowed on this
24.06- acre site would be 419. The Master Plan, which development at Point Edwards must comply with,
envisioned up to 419 units. SEPA was done on the contract rezone and the Comprehensive Plan
amendment, SEPA was done in 2002 under the original ADB approval, that SEPA was adopted in 2003
when the number of the units increased from 295 to 350. Even though the number of units was increased
to 350 halfway through the project, it is consistent with the original master plan that allowed up to 419
units.
Councilmember Bloom relayed her understanding the maximum height of the buildings was to be 35 + 5
feet. Mr. Lien agreed; a maximum of 40 feet; 35 feet plus 5 feet with an approved modulated design.
Councilmember Bloom observed 40 feet would only be 4 stories, yet this building is 5 stories. She asked
how the height was calculated. Mr. Lien answered the City calculates height from average grade. A
rectangle is drawn around the building, the elevation at four corners is used to determine an average grade
and the height limit is calculated from there. For proposals on a hillside such as Building 10 the average
grade runs through the middle. He referred to the average grade shown on page 193, noting the average
elevation is not always at the lowest level; the average elevation, particularly on a slope could cut through
the building itself. In the image on page 193 the average grade is about 143. The southern fagade shows 2
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 19
Packet Page 22 of 133
stories which is below 40 feet. Because the north fagade is on the downhill side of the slope, it has a taller
fagade but from the average grade it still complies with the zone.
Councilmember Bloom referred to appellant Thomas Waggener's presentation where he talked about the
different height calculation in ECDC 21.40.030.A versus ECDC 16.75.020. She asked Mr. Lien to explain
the differences and why one method was used instead of the other. Mr. Lien referred to 16.75.020.B, the
table that lists the different height standards. The maximum height for the MP1 zone is 35 feet and
footnote 4 states the roof may extend up to 5 feet above the stated height limit if design is part of an
approved modulated design in accordance with 20.10. The ADB found Building 10 met the modulated
design and granted the additional 5 feet. Mr. Waggener is referring to footnote 5 that states building
height may be calculated separately for each clearly separate portion of the building as illustrated but not
limited to Figures A, B and C below. Mr. Lien explained Figures A, B and C show how buildings with
distinct separate units, the height rectangle could be done separately for each distinct portion of the
building. The code states this calculation method may be used; it is not a requirement to calculate height
for each distinct portion of a building. The code section he referenced in the staff report, 21.40.030, is the
definition of height which identifies how height calculations are performed; 21.40.030.B addresses
average grade. The standard way the City calculates height is described in 21.40.030 and that is what the
applicant chose to do.
Councilmember Bloom asked how the height would have differed if it had been calculated based on
16.75.020. Joe Kohner, Weber Thomas, stated they did a number of studies; in many cases the building
ended up being higher. The calculation that was done early on used the smallest rectangle. The goal was
to comply with the zoning. Regardless of the height calculation method, there would be five stories in the
eastern wing and four in the western wing. Neither option reduced the building height by a story.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to page 321, Original Building Section 10E and IOW, explaining it
illustrates underground parking and only 3 stories, yet page 192 and 193, the current footprint is an
entirely different building with 5 stories. She questioned how Building 10 increased from 3 stories to 5
stories. Mr. Lien responded the print on page 321 was difficult to read and he was uncertain what the
proposed building heights were compared to the maximum allowable height. The buildings in that
rendering could have been below the maximum allowable 40 feet which may be the reason they are
shown as 4 stories. The current proposal is the maximum height allowed by code.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY-
MONILLAS, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 30 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the Council does not appoint ADB members; the Mayor selects
the members and the Council interviews and confirms their appointment. The ADB does not work for or
report to the Council.
Councilmember Peterson recalled comments that Building 10 was represented to the residents of Point
Edwards during the building phase as something different than the current concept. He asked whether the
Council could take that into account in its deliberations. Ms. Morris answered no, the Council is to
consider the ADB's decision and compliance with the design guidelines, the code, and the
Comprehensive Plan as stated in the Findings and Conclusions.
Council President Petso noted page 321, one of the original pages from the master plan, is not clear. She
asked whether the Council was allowed to obtain a clear copy of that page before making a decision. Ms.
Morris answered yes if the Council felt it was important to its decision.
Council Deliberation
Ms. Morris advised by her count there were 17 different citations to various code sections and allegations
of error in the appeals; some are duplicative. The Council can review and make a decision on each one
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 20
Packet Page 23 of 133
tonight. If the Council wanted to continue the matter, she could prepare a worksheet that lists the
citations/allegations of error, combine duplicative ones, and list the actual code provision.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas supported Ms. Morris' suggestion.
Council President Petso asked whether two weeks was sufficient for her to prepare the worksheet. Ms.
Morris answered yes. Council President Petso advised the materials would need to be provided to Council
several days in advance if Council deliberations were scheduled on October 29. She suggested shortening
the October 29 budget workshop to free up time for this matter. City Clerk Sandy Chase advised there are
complicated departments presenting their budgets on October 29 such as the Police Department and
Public Works. Council President Petso asked whether the presentations could be deferred to a future
meeting if the Council accepted public comment on October 29. Mayor Earling suggested that be
discussed at tomorrow's staff meeting. Ms. Morris offered to prepare the worksheet by Thursday at 5:00
p.m. and deliberations could be scheduled on the October 22 agenda.
Councilmember Peterson advised October 29 is a fifth Tuesday; the Council typically does not meet on
the fifth Tuesday. October 29 is also his wedding anniversary and he had informed the Council President
he would not be at that meeting due to plans made before the meeting was scheduled.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule deliberations on the October 22 agenda.
Mr. Tanaka asked whether the appellants and the applicant would have an opportunity to comment on Ms.
Morris' worksheet. Mayor Earling relayed the intent was to have questions/answers followed by Council
deliberation. Mr. Tanaka relayed his understanding that Ms. Morris will summarize the appeal points and
present them to the Council. He was concerned the appeal points may not be accurately conveyed. Ms.
Morris explained her intent was a spreadsheet listing the 17+ appeal issues and citations from the appeals
and a verbatim listing of the appeal issues just as they are written in the appeals. She will provide that to
the Council on Thursday before 5:00 p.m. and staff can distribute it to everyone else. She did not plan to
summarize the appeal issues.
Mr. Gifford advised he is leaving Friday and will be gone for 10 days. He will not be available to submit
comments or attend the October 22 meeting.
As the applicant's attorney will not be available most of the next two weeks, Council President Petso
suggested rescheduling for November 12 before committee meetings.
It was the consensus of the Council to schedule deliberations on November 12. Ms. Morris will provide
the spreadsheet to Council by October 25.
10. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 8.2013
Finance Committee
Councilmember Buckshnis reported the committee discussed the following:
• Establishment and Operation of Any Structures or Uses Relating to Collective Gardens,
Marijuana Production, Marijuana Processing, or Marijuana Retailing in the City of Edmonds —
Scheduled for full Council
• Authorization for Mayor to Sign 2013-2015 Coordinated Prevention Grant Agreement with
Department of Ecology —Referred to Consent Agenda
• Presentation and Discussion of Utility Rate Adjustments — Scheduled for full Council
• Backflow Prevention Compliance Fee Authorization Discussion — Scheduled for full Council
• Bond Counsel Contract for Edmonds Center for the Arts — Task Force will pursue
• Snohomish County Investment Pool — Information only
• August 2013 Budgetary Financial Report — Referred to Consent Agenda
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 21
Packet Page 24 of 133
Parks, Planning & Public Works Committee
Councilmember Johnson reported the committee discussed:
• Establishment and Operation of Any Structures or Uses Relating to Collective Gardens,
Marijuana Production, Marijuana Processing, or Marijuana Retailing in the City of Edmonds —
Continued discussion at a future meeting
• Backflow prevention compliance fee authorization — Add fee to proposed permit fees in the 2014
budget
• Presentation and discussion of utility rate adjustments — Schedule a presentation and public
hearing at full Council
The following items were referred to tonight's or future Consent Agendas:
o Authorization for Mayor to sign addendum to the A/E PSA for City Park
o Authorization for Mayor to sign Interagency Agreement (IAA) with the Department of
Ecology for Funding the Regional Stormwater Monitoring Program
o Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mountlake Terrace to replace and maintain
approximately 400 linear feet of 8" sewerline and 400 feet waterline and associated
appurtenances within Mountlake Terrace City limits
o Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #3 with Perteet for additional
design work for the 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement Project
o Quarterly Public Works Project Report
o Review of Street Tree Management Policy
Public Safety & Personnel Committee
Councilmember Peterson reported the committee discussed:
• AWC Interlocal Agreement and Resolution for participation in AWC's new self -funded insurance
programs — Forwarded to Consent Agenda
• Edmonds City Code Chapter 2.10 Revisions — Revisions will be included in Chapter 2.10 for
discussion by full Council
• Code of Conduct — Schedule on a future Council agenda
• Council attendance via speaker phone — Forward for full Council discussion to finalize policy
• Establishment and Operation of Any Structures or Uses Relating to Collective Gardens,
Marijuana Production, Marijuana Processing, or Marijuana Retailing in the City of Edmonds —
forward to full Council for a policy discussion to include discussion of federal guidelines and
discussion of buffer issues
11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Earling reported the Chamber, restaurants and retail businesses are holding an Edmonds Kind of
Soiree at the Edmonds Yacht Club on Friday, October 18 from 6:00 — 9:00 p.m. He invited
Councilmembers and citizens to attend.
12. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council President Petso advised the marijuana discussion was tentatively scheduled on the November 26
agenda, a 4"' Tuesday. Although action is not typically taken on 4 h Tuesdays, she expected the Council to
forward the issue to the Planning Board. Mayor Earling provided a reminder of the six month moratorium
that began in August.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas provided Councilmembers and the Mayor an invitation to the Boys &
Girls Club Gala Auction on Saturday, November 16 at the Lynnwood Convention Center. She invited
anyone interested in attending to register online.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 22
Packet Page 25 of 133
Councilmember Buckshnis reported the annual Halloween Howl is this Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00
p.m. at the Marina Beach. The event will include dog friendly vendors and great costumes.
13. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION
PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i).
This item was removed from the agenda via action taken under agenda item 4.
14. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN
EXECUTIVE SESSION.
This item was removed from the agenda via action taken under agenda item 4.
15. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
October 15, 2013
Page 23
Packet Page 26 of 133
AM-6237
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time•
Submitted For:
Department•
Review Committee:
Type:
Subject Title
Consent
Roger Neumaier
Finance
Action
Information
Submitted By:
Committee Action:
4. B.
Nori Jacobson
Approval of claim checks #204872 through #205011 dated October 17, 2013 for $1,093,989.51
(replacement checks #204877 $7.00, $204879 $55.76, #204896 $8.00, #204910 $100.00, #204911
$277.70, #204912 $236.53, #204913 $32.00, #204919 $46.52, #204925 $15.00, #204937 $200.00,
#204940 $140.00, #204943 $42.00, #204977 $43.20, #204978 $115.85, #204991 $75.00, #204992
$186.90, #204993 $1,854.09 & #205009 $130.00). Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #60521
through #60535 for $446,578.82, benefit checks #60536 through #60543 and wire payments of
$193,247.37 for the period October 1, 2013 through October 15, 2013.
Recommendation
Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of expenditures.
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year:
Revenue•
Expenditure•
2013
1,733,815.70
Fiscal Impact:
Claims $1,093,989.51
Claims reissued checks $3,565.55
Payroll Employee checks and direct deposit $446,578.82
Payroll Benefit checks and wire payments $193,247.37
Total Payroll $639,826.19
Packet Page 27 of 133
Attachments
Claim checks 10-17-13
Project Numbers 10-17-13
Payroll Summary 10-18-13
Payroll Benefit 10-18-13
Inbox
Finance
City Clerk
Mayor
Finalize for Agenda
Form Started By: Nori Jacobson
Final Approval Date: 10/17/2013
Form Review
Reviewed By
Date
Roger Neumaier
10/17/2013 01:20 PM
Sandy Chase
10/17/2013 01:22 PM
Dave Earling
10/17/2013 03:45 PM
Sandy Chase
10/17/2013 03:50 PM
Started On: 10/17/2013 11:36 AM
Packet Page 28 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amount
204872
10/16/2013 074615 HOLMBERG, BRITTA
S13-333
SCDC SMALL CLAIM JUDGMENT OI
Snohomish County District Court Smz
011.000.39.518.60.49.00
2,927.56
Total:
2,927.56
204873
10/17/2013 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
9397
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl-
MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER Cl-
421.000.74.534.80.33.00
129,919.44
Total:
129,919.44
204874
10/17/2013 060205 ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP
5313364-00
WWTP - CONSTRUCTION GROUT,
WWTP - CONSTRUCTION GROUT,
423.000.76.535.80.48.21
67.20
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.21
6.38
Total:
73.58
204875
10/17/2013 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC
XF12
WWTP - LAB SERVICES, AMMONIA
WWTP - LAB SERVICES, AMMONIA
423.000.76.535.80.41.31
165.00
Total:
165.00
204876
10/17/2013 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
655-7057672
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
31.25
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.24.00
2.97
Tota I :
34.22
204877
10/17/2013 073311 ASHER, KAREN
ASHER0623
YOST REFUND
REFUND FOR YOST
001.000.000.239.200.000.00
7.00
Total:
7.00
204878
10/17/2013 002100 BARNARD, EARL
90
LEOFF Reimbursement
LEOFF Reimbursement
Page: 1
Packet Page 29 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 2
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204878
10/17/2013 002100 BARNARD, EARL
(Continued)
617.000.51.522.20.23.00
436.49
Total:
436.49
204879
10/17/2013 074298 BEATRICE GRANEN
1-36225
#4245-1955393 UTILITY REFUND
#4245-1955393 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00
55.76
Total:
55.76
204880
10/17/2013 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC
7676
E3JA/E3GB.CONSTRUCTION ADMIT
E3JA/E3GB.Construction Admin Sery
421.000.74.594.34.41.10
12,040.25
E3JA/E3GB.Construction Admin Sery
423.000.75.594.35.41.30
136.25
Total:
12,176.50
204881
10/17/2013 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP
28487
INV#28487 - EDMONDS PD - ROBIN
UNIFORM BOOTS
001.000.41.521.26.24.00
115.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.26.24.00
10.93
Total:
125.93
204882
10/17/2013 074229 BONNIE AUBUCHON
AUBUCHON 17571
SLIVERSMITHING 17571
SLIVERSMITHING 17571
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
110.00
Total:
110.00
204883
10/17/2013 074618 BRICK, MARY
BRICK 102013
SCHEDULING CONFLICT
SCHEDULING CONFLICT
001.000.239.200
27.20
Total:
27.20
204884
10/17/2013 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY
BROCKMAN 17673
PILATES 17673
PILATES 17673
001.000.64.575.54.41.00
297.00
YOGA 17579
Page: 2
Packet
Page 30 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 3
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204884
10/17/2013 072005
BROCKMANN, KERRY
(Continued)
001.000.64.575.54.41.00
274.77
YOGA 17582
001.000.64.575.54.41.00
467.28
YOGA 17585
001.000.64.575.54.41.00
477.90
YOGA 17588
001.000.64.575.54.41.00
639.00
YOGA 17591
001.000.64.575.54.41.00
479.25
YOGA 17594
001.000.64.575.54.41.00
252.45
Total:
2,887.65
204885
10/17/2013 069295
BROWN, CANDY
BROWN 17669
BACKYARD BIRDS 17669
BACKYARD BIRDS 17669
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
84.70
Total:
84.70
204886
10/17/2013 073901
CALDWELL SCULPTURE STUDIO
CALDWELL 10/9/2013
CH TOUR PRESERVE AMERICA
CH TOUR PRESERVE AMERICA
132.000.64.594.76.41.00
11,700.00
Total:
11,700.00
204887
10/17/2013 003510
CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
RN09130976
WWTP - CYLINDER RENTAL
WWTP - CYLINDER RENTAL
423.000.76.535.80.31.11
58.00
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.11
5.51
Total:
63.51
204888
10/17/2013 064291
CENTURY LINK
206-Z02-0478
WWTP TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
WWTP TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
138.73
Total:
138.73
Page: 3
Packet
Page 31 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
204889 10/17/2013 065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC
204890 10/17/2013 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
204891 10/17/2013 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD
204892 10/17/2013 072848 COPIERS NW
204893 10/17/2013 072848 COPIERS NW
204894 10/17/2013 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amount
450901-1309
E9GA.SERVICES THRU SEPTEMBE
E9GA.Services thru September 2013
423.000.75.594.35.41.30
16,262.83
Total :
16,262.83
M&O
MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEA
MONTHLY MAINT/OPERATIONS SEI
423.000.75.535.80.47.20
27,602.00
Total :
27,602.00
10344
E1JB.SERVICES THRU 8/20/13.PRC
E1JB.Services thru 8/20/13.Progress
421.000.74.594.34.65.10
167,230.43
Total :
167,230.43
INV932570
INV#INV932570 ACCT#HMH636 - E[
MO COPIER RENTAL 9/5 TO 10/4/13
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
226.77
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
21.54
INV932571
INV#INV932571 ACCT#HMH636 - E[
BLACK COPIES 9/5 TO 10/4/13
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
74.42
COLOR COPIES 9/5 TO 10/4/13
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
118.44
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.45.00
18.32
Total :
459.49
inv932058
COPIER MAINT
COPIER MAINT
001.000.23.523.30.45.00
16.74
Total:
16.74
3280743
CP PLAY SPRAY PROJECT
CP PLAY SPRAY PROJECT
Page: 4
Packet Page 32 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amount
204894
10/17/2013 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
(Continued)
125.000.64.576.80.44.00
81.90
Total:
81.90
204895
10/17/2013 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE
3280494
ADVERTISING RFP FOR EDMONDS
Advertisement for RFP for marketing.
140.000.61.558.70.44.00
88.20
Total:
88.20
204896
10/17/2013 073647 DALAN, KAIJA
DALAN0504
REFUND
REFUND OF CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00
8.00
Total:
8.00
204897
10/17/2013 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC
336139
E1CA.SERVICES THRU 9/14/13
E1CA.Services thru 9/14/13
112.200.68.595.33.41.00
5,371.46
Total:
5,371.46
204898
10/17/2013 061570 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS - 03
345185
INV#345185 - EDMONDS PD
CALIBRATE RADAR #SHD-01690 (N
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
70.00
FUELSURCHARGE
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
10.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
7.60
Total :
87.60
204899
10/17/2013 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES
2013090225
CUSTOMER ID# D200-0
Scan Services for September 2013
001.000.31.518.88.42.00
940.00
Total:
940.00
204900
10/17/2013 064531 DINES, JEANNIE
13-3396
MINUTE TAKING
10/8 Council Minutes
001.000.25.514.30.41.00
249.00
Page: 5
Packet Page 33 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 6
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204900
10/17/2013 064531 064531 DINES, JEANNIE
(Continued)
Total:
249.00
204901
10/17/2013 073512 DKS ASSOCIATES
53048
E2AC.SERVICES THRU 8/30/13
E2AC.Services thru 8/30/13
112.200.68.595.33.41.00
10,349.34
Total:
10,349.34
204902
10/17/2013 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS
213-EDM-01-003
13-0948 &0961.McDonald's & CHC.
13-0948 &0961.McDonald's & CHC.
001.000.62.524.20.41.00
697.00
Total:
697.00
204903
10/17/2013 073461 EDMONDS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
EDMOND ED 102013
REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT
REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.239.200
200.00
Total:
200.00
204904
10/17/2013 074302 EDMONDS HARDWARE & PAINT LLC
10913
SIMPLE GREEN
SIMPLE GREEN
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
4.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
0.47
Total:
5.46
204905
10/17/2013 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
1-00575
CITY PARK
CITY PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
650.46
1-00825
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROON
BRACKETT'S LANDING RESTROON
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
977.48
1-00875
SPRINKLER
SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
50.90
1-02125
CITY PARK SPRINKLER METER
CITY PARK SPRINKLER METER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
70.01
1-03710
290 MAIN ST
Page: 6
Packet Page 34 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amount
204905 10/17/2013 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION (Continued)
290 MAIN ST
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
37.25
1-03900
SPRINKLER
SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
132.80
1-05125
SPRINKLER
SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
70.01
1-05285
GAZEBO IRRIGATION
GAZEBO IRRIGATION
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
31.79
1-05340
CORNER PARK
CORNER PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
78.20
1-05650
EDMONDS CITY PARK
EDMONDS CITY PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
31.79
1-05675
PARKS MAINTENANCE SHOP
PARKS MAINTENANCE SHOP
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,149.78
1-05700
EDMONDS CITY PARK
EDMONDS CITY PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
176.48
1-09650
CORNER PARK
CORNER PARK
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
67.28
1-09800
SW CORNER SPRINKLER
SW CORNER SPRINKLER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
80.93
1-10780
PLANTER
PLANTER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
100.04
1-16130
CORNER PLANTER ON 5TH
CORNER PLANTER ON 5TH
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
127.34
Page: 7
Packet Page 35 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 8
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amount
204905
10/17/2013 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
(Continued)
1-16300
CORNER PARKS
CORNER PARKS
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
291.15
1-16420
118 5TH AVE N
118 5TH AVE N
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
42.71
1-16450
CITY HALL TRIANGLE
CITY HALL TRIANGLE
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
212.74
1-16630
6TH & MAIN PLANTER BOX
6TH & MAIN PLANTER BOX
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
304.80
1-17475
5TH & DAYTON ST PLANTER
5TH & DAYTON ST PLANTER
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
59.09
1-19950
PINE STREE PLAYFIELD
PINE STREE PLAYFIELD
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
64.89
1-36255
1141 9TH AVE S
1141 9TH AVE S
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
31.79
Total:
4,839.71
204906
10/17/2013 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
0922561
PARKS MAINTENANCE C1030 EQUI
PARKS MAINTENANCE C1030 EQUI
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
14.78
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
1.40
Total:
16.18
204907
10/17/2013 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
092300
COPIER MAINT
COPIER MAINT
001.000.23.523.30.45.00
1.01
Total:
1.01
Page: 8
Packet Page 36 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 9
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
204908 10/17/2013 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 0922571
0922581
204909 10/17/2013 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 091991
204910 10/17/2013 073193 EMERSON, BRIANA
204911 10/17/2013 008963 ENERCO INC
204912 10/17/2013 008963 ENERCO INC
Eng20060465
12985
PO # Description/Account
Amount
Meter charges for Planning Dept. C1(
Meter charges for Planning Dept. C1(
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
24.70
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
2.35
Meter charges for Building C1030
Meter charges for Building C1030
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
28.63
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
2.72
Total :
58.40
CUST# MK5533 C5051 GQM52286 C
Meter charges 08/30/13 - 09/30/13 Bt
001.000.31.514.23.48.00
83.51
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.31.514.23.48.00
7.93
Total :
91.44
REFUND ST CUT DEPOSIT
P/A 7211 Meadowdale Beach Rd-
001.000.000.257.620.000.00
100.00
Total :
100.00
Traffic - Flasher Cube, Supplies
Traffic - Flasher Cube, Supplies
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
255.00
8.9% Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
22.70
Total :
277.70
STREET - FLASHERS FOR SCHOOI
STREET - FLASHERS FOR SCHOOI
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
207.00
Freight
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
10.00
Page: 9
Packet Page 37 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 10
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204912
10/17/2013 008963 ENERCO INC
(Continued)
Sales Tax
111.000.653.542.640.310.00
19.53
Total:
236.53
204913
10/17/2013 073389 ERIKSEN, LEE KRISTIAN
09032010
REFUND FOR CONCEALED PISTOL
Refund for concealed pistol license
001.000.000.239.200.000.00
32.00
Total:
32.00
204914
10/17/2013 071859 EVISTON, SUZANNE P
2013-0929
INV 2013-0929 EDMONDS PD - POL
POLICE SERVICE DOG "HOBBS" -
001.000.41.521.26.41.00
8,500.00
8.6% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.26.41.00
731.00
Total:
9,231.00
204915
10/17/2013 069940 FIRSTADVANTAGE SBS
271447
INV 271447 ACCT ODY900JJM EDM
2 CREDIT CHECKS - SEPT 2013
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
21.00
Total:
21.00
204916
10/17/2013 011900 FRONTIER
425-775-1344
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHIN
BEACH RANGER PHONE @ FISHIN
001.000.64.574.35.42.00
57.77
Total:
57.77
204917
10/17/2013 011900 FRONTIER
425-712-0423
WWTP AFTER HOUR BUSINESS LII
WWTP AFTER HOUR BUSINESS LII
423.000.76.535.80.42.00
62.25
Total:
62.25
204918
10/17/2013 011900 FRONTIER
253-011-1177
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
001.000.65.519.91.42.00
5.48
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
111.000.68.542.90.42.00
20.81
Page: 10
Packet
Page 38 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 11
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204918
10/17/2013 011900 FRONTIER
(Continued)
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
20.81
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
423.000.75.535.80.42.00
20.81
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
511.000.77.548.68.42.00
20.81
PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE'
422.000.72.531.90.42.00
20.78
425-745-4313
CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 M
CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSIOI`
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
117.38
425-775-7865
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE
UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FI'
421.000.74.534.80.42.00
57.13
Tota I :
284.01
204919
10/17/2013 074266 GEOFFREY BOLINGER
8-50222
#120396SL UTILITY REFUND
#120396SL Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00
46.52
Total:
46.52
204920
10/17/2013 072515 GOOGLE INC
7634499
C/A#396392 MESSAGE DISCOVER
Internet Anti -Virus & Spam Maint Fee
001.000.31.518.88.48.00
375.00
Total:
375.00
204921
10/17/2013 012199 GRAINGER
9256975526
WWTP - REPAIR AND REPLACE/EL
WWTP - REPAIR AND REPLACE/EL
423.000.76.535.80.48.22
698.50
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.22
66.36
Total:
764.86
204922
10/17/2013 073345 GREENWOOD HEATING & A/C
BLD20131009
Permit withdrawn by contractor. Job
Permit withdrawn by contractor. Job
Page: 11
Packet
Page 39 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 12
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204922
10/17/2013 073345 GREENWOOD HEATING & A/C
(Continued)
001.000.257.620
75.00
Total:
75.00
204923
10/17/2013 012560 HACH COMPANY
HACH121836
WWTP - ANNUAL WIMS SUPPORT
WWTP - ANNUAL WIMS SUPPORT
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
3,000.00
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
285.00
Total:
3,285.00
204924
10/17/2013 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
4082026
WWTP - FILTERS, NOZZLES, UTILF
WWTP- FILTERS, NOZZLES, UTILF
423.000.76.535.80.31.21
90.50
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.21
8.60
7282310
WWTP - SWITCHES, SS PLATES
WWTP - SWITCHES, SS PLATES
423.000.76.535.80.31.22
106.83
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.22
10.15
8282133
WWTP - PAINT
WWTP - PAINT
423.000.76.535.80.31.22
5.27
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.22
0.50
9040602
WWTP - LUMBER, SEALENT, HAMN
WWTP - LUMBER, SEALENT, HAMN
423.000.76.535.80.31.21
38.35
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.21
3.64
Tota I :
263.84
204925
10/17/2013 073651 HONIGBAUM, STACY
HONIGBAUM0504
REFUND
REFUND OF CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00
15.00
Page: 12
Packet
Page 40 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 13
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204925
10/17/2013 073651
073651 HONIGBAUM, STACY
(Continued)
Total:
15.00
204926
10/17/2013 060165
HWA GEOSCIENCES INC
24609
Professional services through 9/29/1:
Professional services through 9/29/11�
001.000.62.524.20.41.00
2,470.00
Total:
2,470.00
204927
10/17/2013 073548
INDOFF INCORPORATED
2347543
WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES
WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES
423.000.76.535.80.31.41
1.75
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.41
0.17
2348688
WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES
WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES
423.000.76.535.80.31.41
50.91
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.41
4.84
2348988
WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES
WWTP - OFFICE SUPPLIES
423.000.76.535.80.31.41
79.51
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.41
7.55
Total:
144.73
204928
10/17/2013 073548
INDOFF INCORPORATED
2348050
Office Supplies
Office Supplies
001.000.22.518.10.31.00
15.50
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.22.518.10.31.00
1.47
Total:
16.97
204929
10/17/2013 068814
INDUSTRIAL FABRICS CORP
407110
WWTP - DUROTEX BELS
WWTP - DUROTEX BELS
423.000.76.535.80.48.11
7,036.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.11
402.00
Page: 13
Packet
Page 41 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 14
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204929
10/17/2013 068814 068814 INDUSTRIAL FABRICS CORP
(Continued)
Total:
7,438.00
204930
10/17/2013 066032 J BOZEAT & ASSOCIATES LLC
J3127/A
WWTP - 2" FP MAS G2-ED S/STEEI
WWTP - 2" FP MAS G2-ED S/STEEI
423.000.76.535.80.48.22
2,355.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.48.22
82.82
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.48.22
231.60
Total:
2,669.42
204931
10/17/2013 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC
597571
WWTP - HYPOCHLORITE
WWTP - HYPOCHLORITE
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
2,652.94
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.53
250.28
Total:
2,903.22
204932
10/17/2013 070902 KAREN ULVESTAD PHOTOGRAPHY
ULVESTAD 17753
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY 17753
DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHY 17753
001.000.64.571.22.41.00
84.00
Total:
84.00
204933
10/17/2013 073579 KINGS HEATING INC
BLD20131122
Online permit outside City limits.
Online permit outside City limits.
001.000.257.620
75.00
Total:
75.00
204934
10/17/2013 067568 KPG INC
75413
E2AD.SERVICES THRU 7/25/13
E2AD.Services thru 7/25/13
112.200.68.595.33.41.00
14,414.34
85413
E2AD.SERVICES THRU 8/25/13
E2AD.Services thru 8/25/13
112.200.68.595.33.41.00
4,048.06
Total:
18,462.40
204935
10/17/2013 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH
10072013-01
INV#10072013-01 - EDMONDS PD
Page: 14
Packet Page 42 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 15
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204935
10/17/2013 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH
(Continued)
20 CAR WASHES $5.03 (INCTAX)
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
100.60
Total:
100.60
204936
10/17/2013 068493 L.E.E.D.
09301301
INV#09301301 EDMONDS PD - SW/
DEF-TEC LOW ROLL NFDD
001.000.257.410
1,182.24
DEF-TEC NFDD #25 RELOAD
001.000.257.410
583.44
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.257.410
167.74
Total:
1,933.42
204937
10/17/2013 073874 LIFELINE SCREENING
LIFELINE 12/19/2012
REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT
REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.000.239.200.000.00
200.00
Total:
200.00
204938
10/17/2013 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC
20133 expenses
08-13 LEGALS FEES
08-13 reimbursement for expenses -
001.000.36.515.31.41.00
3,691.60
20134 expenses
09-13 EXPENSES
09/13 reimbursement for expenses -
001.000.36.515.31.41.00
401.00
OCT-2013
10-13 LEGALS FEES
10-13 Legal fees
001.000.36.515.31.41.00
32,000.00
Total:
36,092.60
204939
10/17/2013 074325 LOPEZ, YUREMI
LOPEZ 102013
REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT
REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT
001.000.239.200
500.00
Total:
500.00
204940
10/17/2013 073485 MACDONALD, ERIC
STF20100020
Application withdrawn.
Page: 15
Packet
Page 43 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 16
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204940
10/17/2013 073485 MACDONALD, ERIC
(Continued)
Application withdrawn.
001.000.000.257.620.000.00
140.00
Total:
140.00
204941
10/17/2013 064870 MAYES TESTING ENGINEERS INC
09131-13413
E3JB.TO 13-01.SERVICES THRU SE
E3JB.TO 13-01.Services thru Septerr
421.000.74.594.34.41.10
1,782.50
Total:
1,782.50
204942
10/17/2013 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO
61196528
WWTP - TUBING, SCREWS, WASHI
WWTP - TUBING, SCREWS, WASHI
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
292.11
Freight
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
8.31
Total:
300.42
204943
10/17/2013 073340 MEDA, CATHARINE
MEDA0723
REFUND
REFUND OF SWIM LESSONS
001.000.000.239.200.000.00
42.00
Total:
42.00
204944
10/17/2013 074620 MEIERS, ANNE & MICHAEL
E3FF.Meiers Pmt 1
E3FF.MEIERS PAYMENT NO. 1
E3FF.Meiers Payment No. 1
422.000.72.594.31.41.20
103,972.75
Total:
103,972.75
204945
10/17/2013 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENTALL INC
177587
PARKS PARTS
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
3.38
PARKS PARTS
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
35.60
Total:
38.98
204946
10/17/2013 074306 NEBCO/NPRIT
2982529
LEOFF Medical Ins Premiums
LEOFF Medical Ins Premiums
617.000.51.522.20.23.00
1,148.97
Page: 16
Packet
Page 44 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 17
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amount
204946
10/17/2013 074306
NEBCO/NPRIT
(Continued)
LEOFF Medical Ins Premiums
009.000.39.517.37.23.00
8,189.74
Total:
9,338.71
204947
10/17/2013 066391
NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC
45544
WWTP - BISULFITE
WWTP - BISULFITE
423.000.76.535.80.31.54
1,158.04
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.54
110.01
Total:
1,268.05
204948
10/17/2013 070045
NORTHUP GROUP
2797
INV 2797 - EDMONDS PD - POST SE
DEBRIEFING - JM
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
125.00
DEBRIEFING - AG
001.000.41.521.10.41.00
125.00
Total:
250.00
204949
10/17/2013 061013
NORTHWEST CASCADE INC
1-770381
CIVIC FIELD RENTALS
CIVIC FIELD RENTALS
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
112.35
Total:
112.35
204950
10/17/2013 073392
NORTHWEST PERMIT INC
BLD20130737
Application withdrawn. Job cancelled.
Application withdrawn. Job cancelled.
001.000.257.620
80.00
Total:
80.00
204951
10/17/2013 025690
NOYES, KARIN
000 00 420
Planning Board minutes on 9/13/13.
Planning Board minutes on 9/13/13.
001.000.62.558.60.41.00
224.00
Total:
224.00
204952
10/17/2013 073522
NW HYDRAULIC CONSULTANTS INC
17347
E3FB.SERVICES THRU 9/30/13
E3FB.Services thru 9/30/13
422.000.72.594.31.41.20
3,877.11
Page: 17
Packet Page 45 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 18
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204952
10/17/2013 073522
073522 NW HYDRAULIC CONSULTANTS IN( (Continued)
Total:
3,877.11
204953
10/17/2013 063511
OFFICE MAX INC 628552
INV#628552 ACCT#520437 250POL
PATROL MEMO PADS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
19.35
LEGAL PADS 5 X8
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
12.92
SMALL BINDER CLIPS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
1.15
LEGAL PADS 8.5 X11
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
24.16
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
5.48
Total:
63.06
204954
10/17/2013 063511
OFFICE MAX INC 287186
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
-4.10
606192
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.23.512.50.31.00
11.49
606440
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
001.000.23.523.30.31.00
245.49
Total:
252.88
204955
10/17/2013 063511
OFFICE MAX INC 287178
Credit for pricing descrepancies.
Credit for pricing descrepancies.
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
-3.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
-0.29
566036
Voice mail log books.
Voice mail log books.
001.000.62.524.10.31.00
37.91
Total:
34.62
Page: 18
Packet
Page 46 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 19
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice
204956 10/17/2013 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER September 2013
204957 10/17/2013 073751 OKANOGAN COUNTRY SHERIFF
204958 10/17/2013 072876 OPENSHAW, DOUGLAS
OKC JAIL - 09/13
OPENSHAW 102013
PO # Description/Account
Amount
COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANS
Emergency Medical Services & Traun
001.000.237.120
1,652.44
PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account
001.000.237.130
32,792.41
Building Code Fee Account
001.000.237.150
162.00
State Patrol Death Investigation
001.000.237.330
158.26
Judicial Information Systems Account
001.000.237.180
5,921.85
School Zone Safety Account
001.000.237.200
34.18
Washington Auto Theft Prevention
001.000.237.250
3,284.16
Traumatic Brain Injury
001.000.237.260
614.93
Accessible Communities Acct
001.000.237.290
66.66
Multi -Model Transportation
001.000.237.300
66.66
Hwy Safety Acct
001.000.237.320
251.12
Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis
001.000.237.170
76.64
WSP Hwy Acct
001.000.237.340
897.31
Total :
45,978.62
EDMONDS PD - INMATE HOUSING
INMATE HOUSING - 60 DAYS @ $52
001.000.41.523.60.41.00
3,210.00
Total :
3,210.00
CLASS CANCELLED- REFUND
CLASS CANCELLED- REFUND
Page: 19
Packet Page 47 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 20
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204958
10/17/2013 072876 OPENSHAW, DOUGLAS
(Continued)
001.000.239.200
53.00
Total:
53.00
204959
10/17/2013 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.
023040764
PAINT
PAINT
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
91.26
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
8.67
954023040565
PAINT
PAINT
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
130.99
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
12.44
Total:
243.36
204960
10/17/2013 074614 PENSER NORTH AMERICA
35962
Workers Comp Claims Mgmt
Workers Comp Claims Mgmt
001.000.22.518.10.41.00
1,000.00
Total:
1,000.00
204961
10/17/2013 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC
20100166.000-27
E2DB.SERVICES THRU 9/29/13
E2DB.Services thru 9/29/13
132.000.64.594.76.41.00
1,508.26
Total:
1,508.26
204962
10/17/2013 008350 PETTY CASH
PARKS PETTY 1013
SUPPLIES FOR PA MEETING
SUPPLIES FOR PA MEETING
117.200.64.575.50.31.00
16.65
VINEGAR FOR PRESCHOOL
001.000.64.575.56.31.00
3.64
DISCOVERY PROGRAMS SUMMER
001.000.64.574.35.31.00
4.37
CONTAINERS FOR INTERCEPTS
001.000.64.571.21.31.00
1.10
CERAL FOR PROJECT
Page: 20
Packet
Page 48 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 21
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
Voucher
usbank
Date Vendor
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amount
204962
10/17/2013 008350 PETTY CASH
(Continued)
001.000.64.575.56.31.00
3.88
VINEGAR FOR CLEANING
001.000.64.574.35.31.00
19.96
ERASERS
001.000.64.575.56.31.00
4.38
ART SELECTION COMMITTEE MEE'
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
5.99
PROJECTS FOR SUPPLIES
001.000.64.575.56.31.00
7.64
DOWELS FOR DISPLAYS
001.000.64.575.56.31.00
4.33
POSTER BOARD
001.000.64.575.56.31.00
5.48
HAIRBANDS AND BOBBY PINS
001.000.64.575.55.31.00
29.30
PARKS SUPPLIES
001.000.64.576.80.31.00
65.50
PAPER TOWELS FOR TANK
001.000.64.574.35.31.00
10.94
FIRST AID COMPRESS
001.000.64.575.55.31.00
13.58
C BATTERIES
001.000.64.574.35.31.00
8.20
Total :
204.94
204963
10/17/2013 008400 PETTY CASH
ADMIN PC 9/30/13 POLICE ADMIN PETTY CASH 9/30/1
SUPPLIES FOR SWAT "LANTERN"
001.000.257.410
55.21
ACADEMY GEAR - VAN DOORN
001.000.41.521.22.24.00
72.24
PARKING AT KC JAIL 13-2735
001.000.41.521.21.43.00
10.00
SGT MCCLURE PROMOTION CERT
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
2.72
Page: 21
Packet Page 49 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 22
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204963
10/17/2013 008400 PETTY CASH
(Continued)
CAR WASH FOR POLICE VEHICLE
104.000.41.521.21.48.00
10.00
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLE TAKEN T(
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
20.00
FOOD FOR COACH ING/COUNSELIP
001.000.41.521.40.31.00
28.90
PLATES FOR ACCREDITATION VISI'
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
3.42
FOOD FOR ACCREDITATION ON-SI'
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
19.98
REPLACEMENT TV MOUNT FOR SC
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
65.54
Total:
288.01
204964
10/17/2013 027885 PHYSIO CONTROL
114050229
WWTP - ELECTRODE FOR AED
WWTP - ELECTRODE FOR AED
423.000.76.535.80.31.12
88.00
Freight
423.000.76.535.80.31.12
23.50
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.12
10.60
Total:
122.10
204965
10/17/2013 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
5800050
WWTP - CONDUITS, GASKETS, CO
WWTP - CONDUITS, GASKETS, CO
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
319.26
9.5% Sales Tax
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
30.33
5802366
WWTP - GALV STEEL CONDUIT, CC
WWTP - GALV STEEL CONDUIT, CC
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
355.83
9.5% Sales Tax
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
33.80
5819175
WWTP - ELECT SUPPLIES FOR S"
WWTP - ELECT SUPPLIES FOR S"
Page: 22
Packet
Page 50 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 23
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204965
10/17/2013 028860
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC
(Continued)
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
1,065.98
9.5% Sales Tax
423.100.76.594.39.65.10
101.27
5835938
WWTP - 125/250V, LEV 2711
WWTP - 125/250V, LEV 2711
423.000.76.535.80.31.22
41.51
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.22
3.94
Total:
1,951.92
204966
10/17/2013 073231
POLYDYNE INC
834140
WWTP - POLYMER
WWTP - POLYMER
423.000.76.535.80.31.51
8,184.00
Total:
8,184.00
204967
10/17/2013 064088
PROTECTION ONE
31146525
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL
ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 1�
001.000.66.518.30.42.00
45.91
Total:
45.91
204968
10/17/2013 071911
PROTZ, MARGARET
PROTZ 17680
FELDENKRAIS 17680
FELDENKRAIS 17680
001.000.64.575.54.41.00
165.00
Total:
165.00
204969
10/17/2013 067263
PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0015964-IN
WWTP - NIGHTSTICK PENLIGHTS,
WWTP - NIGHTSTICK PENLIGHTS,
423.000.76.535.80.31.12
247.75
9.5% Sales Tax
423.000.76.535.80.31.12
23.53
Total:
271.28
204970
10/17/2013 030780
QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
INV#00000140162
CRITCHLOW INSCRIPTION
CRITCHLOW INSCRIPTION
130.000.64.536.20.34.00
100.00
Page: 23
Packet Page 51 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 24
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204970
10/17/2013 030780 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC
(Continued)
Total:
100.00
204971
10/17/2013 073885 RANDOLPH, PAMELA
WEFTEC 2013
WWTP - REIMBURSEMENT FOR WI
WWTP - REIMBURSEMENT FOR WI
423.000.76.535.80.49.71
2,306.93
Total:
2,306.93
204972
10/17/2013 074619 RATHVON, LOIS
RATHVON 102013
RATHVON REFUND CLASS CANCE
RATHVON REFUND CLASS CANCE
001.000.239.200
31.00
Total:
31.00
204973
10/17/2013 074156 RAZZ CONSTRUCTION INC
E9GA.Pmt 10
E9GA.PMT 10 THRU 09/30/13
E9GA.Pmt 10 thru 09/30/13
423.000.75.594.35.65.30
345,865.04
Total:
345,865.04
204974
10/17/2013 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197
3-0197-0800478
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
140.83
3-0197-0800897
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
001.000.65.519.91.47.00
27.90
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
111.000.68.542.90.47.00
106.03
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
421.000.74.534.80.47.00
106.03
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ;
423.000.75.535.80.47.10
106.03
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
511.000.77.548.68.47.00
106.03
PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH
422.000.72.531.90.47.00
106.05
3-0197-0801132
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST
FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ;
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
149.37
Page: 24
Packet Page 52 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 25
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204974
10/17/2013 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197
(Continued)
3-0197-0829729
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDAL
001.000.66.518.30.47.00
64.98
Total:
913.25
204975
10/17/2013 006841 RICOH USA INC
5027838216
Meter charges for large copier 907EX
Meter charges for large copier 907EX
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
36.21
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
3.44
5027838217
Contract charge for Engineering MPC
Contract charge for Engineering MPC
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
283.52
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.62.524.10.45.00
26.93
Total:
350.10
204976
10/17/2013 067447 RILEY, CHARLES H.
91
LEOFF Reimbursement
LEOFF Reimbursement
009.000.39.517.37.23.00
886.01
Tota I :
886.01
204977
10/17/2013 073959 SALGADO, ANGELICA
SALGAD015580
ZUMBA CLASSES
ZUMBA #15580
001.000.640.575.540.410.00
43.20
Total:
43.20
204978
10/17/2013 074079 SCOTT & MICHAEL OUTSEN
3-13350
611029771-KK UTILITY REFUND
611029771-KK Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00
115.85
Total:
115.85
204979
10/17/2013 074431 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST LLC
201314593
YOST POOL
YOST POOL
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
700.00
Page: 25
Packet
Page 53 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 26
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204979
10/17/2013 074431 SEATTLE ASBESTOS TEST LLC
(Continued)
9.5% Sales Tax
125.000.64.576.80.48.00
66.50
Total:
766.50
204980
10/17/2013 036509 SIGNATURE FORMS INC
1132060
INV#1132060 ACCT#CEDM - EDMOI
CONTINUOUS DOG LICENSE RENE
001.000.41.521.70.31.00
380.85
Freight
001.000.41.521.70.31.00
10.07
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.70.31.00
37.14
1132061
INV#1132061 ACCT#CEDM - EDMOI
DOG LICENSE RENEWAL FORMS
001.000.41.521.70.31.00
316.08
Freight
001.000.41.521.70.31.00
32.10
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.70.31.00
33.08
Total:
809.32
204981
10/17/2013 071725 SKAGIT GARDENS INC
52210873
FLOWER PROGRAM
FLOWER PROGRAM
001.000.64.576.81.31.00
337.02
Total:
337.02
204982
10/17/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
2002-6027-1
YOST POOL
YOST POOL
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
1,506.77
2025-4064-7
8100 190TH ST SW
8100 190TH ST SW
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
32.33
Total :
1,539.10
204983
10/17/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
2002-0255-4
WWTP FLOW METER 2400 HIGHW�
WWTP FLOW METER 2400 HIGHW
Page: 26
Packet
Page 54 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 27
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204983
10/17/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
(Continued)
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
31.27
2019-2988-2
WWTP FLOW METER 8421 244TH ;
WWTP FLOW METER 8421 244TH ;
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
31.27
2019-9517-2
WWTP FLOW METER 9805 EDMON
WWTP FLOW METER 9805 EDMON
423.000.76.535.80.47.62
32.33
2025-7952-0
WWTP ENERGY MANAGEMENT SE
WWTP ENERGY MANAGEMENT SE
423.000.76.535.80.47.61
8.43
Total:
103.30
204984
10/17/2013 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1
2007-0685-1
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21200 84TH AVE W
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21200 84TH AVE W
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
31.27
2007-2302-1
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / MI
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
38.19
2014-3124-4
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC.
PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 9301 PUC
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
32.33
2014-4175-5
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.68.47.00
84.06
2022-8945-0
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / ME
111.000.68.542.64.47.00
138.83
Total:
324.68
204985
10/17/2013 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE
2013-1773
CREDIT/ADJUST ON #2013-1773 - E
CR 1 BOOKING FOR ADAMS 8/13
001.000.41.523.60.51.00
-94.95
CR 9 HOUSING DAYS ADAMS 8/13
001.000.41.523.60.51.00
-593.46
3 WORK RELEASE @ $32.00
Page: 27
Packet
Page 55 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 28
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204985
10/17/2013 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE
(Continued)
001.000.41.523.60.51.00
-60.00
CR 31 WR DAYS HAYS 8/13
001.000.41.523.60.51.00
-1,373.62
2013-1773
INV#2013-1773 - EDMONDS PD
69.08 BOOKINGS @ $94.95
001.000.41.523.60.51.00
6,559.15
562.08 HOUSING DAYS @ $65.94
001.000.41.523.60.51.00
37,063.56
56 WORK RELEASE @ $44.31
001.000.41.523.60.51.00
2,481.36
CHG FOR 31 W/R (HAYS) FROM 8/1
001.000.41.523.60.51.00
992.00
Total:
44,974.04
204986
10/17/2013 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY
63083
OCTOBER SOLID WASTE FEES
OCTOBER SOLID WASTE FEES
001.000.64.576.80.47.00
851.00
Total:
851.00
204987
10/17/2013 067609 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES
10/9/13
SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES DINN
Attendance at September SCC dinner
001.000.21.513.10.43.00
70.00
Total:
70.00
204988
10/17/2013 067609 SNOHOMISH COUNTY CITIES
Sept 19, 2013
Sept. 19, 2013 SCC Dinner Meeting -
Sept. 19, 2013 SCC Dinner Meeting -
001.000.11.511.60.43.00
105.00
Total:
105.00
204989
10/17/2013 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO
103584
WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / RECYCLIN,
WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / RECYCLINi
423.000.76.535.80.47.66
29.25
Total:
29.25
204990
10/17/2013 069599 SOUTH COUNTY PLUMBING INC
BLD20130954
Not for WSL. No Engineering Inspect!
Page: 28
Packet
Page 56 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 29
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amount
204990
10/17/2013 069599 SOUTH COUNTY PLUMBING INC
(Continued)
Not for WSL. No Engineering Inspect
001.000.257.620
40.00
Total:
40.00
204991
10/17/2013 063308 STATE OF WASHINGTON
Bus Lic Ref
BUS LIC REF CST #00005061
Bus Lic Ref Cst #00005061
001.000.000.257.310.000.00
75.00
Total:
75.00
204992
10/17/2013 063308 STATE OF WASHINGTON
2-13250
RE:4201-1770368 UTILITY REFUND
RE:#4201-1770368 Utility Refund due
411.000.000.233.000.000.00
54.42
3-11925
30066587 UTILITY REFUND
30066587 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00
83.37
4-10650
RE:#611012030 UTILITY REFUND
RE:#611012030 Utility Refund due to
411.000.000.233.000.000.00
13.84
8-40175
RE:#30053465-319 JP6 UTILITY REF
RE:#30053465-319 JP6 Utility Refunc
411.000.000.233.000.000.00
35.27
Total:
186.90
204993
10/17/2013 063308 STATE OF WASHINGTON
011910
JURY FEE
JURY FEE
001.000.230.512.540.490.00
15.00
10092009
JURORS
JURORS
001.000.230.512.540.490.00
15.50
18371
COPIES
COPIES
411.000.656.538.800.310.41
10.20
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.310.41
0.97
18388
UPS/ANALYSIS PLUS
Page: 29
Packet Page 57 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 30
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204993
10/17/2013 063308 STATE OF WASHINGTON
(Continued)
UPS/ANALYSIS PLUS
411.000.656.538.800.420.00
11.34
9.5% Sales Tax
411.000.656.538.800.420.00
1.08
2052010
JURY FEE
JURY FEE
001.000.230.512.540.490.00
15.00
ENG20060462
REFUND STREET CUT DEPOSIT
P/A 7217 Meadowdale Beach Rd Per
001.000.000.257.620.000.00
100.00
NWSOCCER0708
REFUND
REFUND FOR CANCELLED RENTAI
001.000.000.239.200.000.00
135.00
PLN20090048
Applicant has withdrawn the applicatii
Applicant has withdrawn the applicatii
001.000.000.257.620.000.00
1,550.00
Total:
1,854.09
204994
10/17/2013 074617 STOJKOVIC, NICHOLAS
Stojkovic. Refund
STOJKOVIC.REFUND FOR CURB G
Stojkovic. Refund for curb gutter
112.200.239.100
3,025.00
Total:
3,025.00
204995
10/17/2013 073970 TALLMAN, TYLER
TALLMAN 10152013
GYM MONITOR FOR VOLLEYBALL
GYM MONITOR FOR VOLLEYBALL
001.000.64.575.52.41.00
35.00
Total:
35.00
204996
10/17/2013 009350 THE DAILY HERALD COMPANY
LG518200
NEWSPAPER AD
Ordinance 3943
001.000.25.514.30.44.00
27.52
Total:
27.52
204997
10/17/2013 062693 US BANK
4675
HOOPS FOR GYMNASTICS
HOOPS FOR GYMNASTICS
Page: 30
Packet Page 58 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 31
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204997
10/17/2013 062693 US BANK
(Continued)
001.000.64.575.55.31.00
164.25
NAME BADGES FOR WOTS
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
46.85
DUCK TAPE FOR GYMNASTICS
001.000.64.575.55.31.00
17.77
WRPA BUSINESS INSTITUTUE
001.000.64.571.21.49.00
120.00
PA SYSTEM FOR WOTS
117.100.64.573.20.35.00
129.99
PLATES WOTS
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
53.19
CUPS FOR WOTS
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
96.82
COOKIES FOR WOTS
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
55.00
CAMERA FOR WOTS/EAC
117.100.64.573.20.35.00
428.79
WRPA SOFTWARE SYMPOSIUM
001.000.64.571.21.49.00
29.00
BATTERY FOR CAMERA
117.100.64.573.20.35.00
22.90
PRESCHOOL CLASSROOM SUPPLI
001.000.64.575.56.31.00
662.00
LUNCHES FOR WOTS
117.100.64.573.20.31.00
1,438.37
Total:
3,264.93
204998
10/17/2013 062693 US BANK
5923
PARKING
Parking while attending tourism meeti
001.000.61.519.70.43.00
6.00
Total:
6.00
204999
10/17/2013 062693 US BANK
2519
INV#2519 10/07/13 EDMONDS PD -
CLEAR COVERS -ACCREDITATION
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
6.56
Page: 31
Packet Page 59 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 32
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
204999 10/17/2013 062693 US BANK
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
ENC ANALYSIS/HARDWICK/MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
21.64
ENC ANALYSIS/HARDWICK/FUEL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
50.04
ENC ANALYSIS/HARDWICK/MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
55.99
ENC ANALYSIS/HARDWICK/LODGI I`
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
220.38
ON SITE ACCREDITATION SNACKS
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
40.00
ON SITE ACCRED ASSESSOR MEA
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
40.52
ADV SWAT/LIM/FOOD
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
42.88
ADV SWAT/LIM/MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
22.88
ADV SWAT/LIM/FOOD
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
10.48
ADV SWAT/LIM/MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
27.43
ADV SWAT/LIM/FUEL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
38.00
ADV SWAT/LIM/MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
63.51
ADV SWAT/LIM/LODGING
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
464.82
ADV SWAT/LIM/MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
25.48
3181 INV#3181 10/07/13 EDMONDS PD -
MINDFLASH-MO FEE FOR ONLINE'
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
199.00
WIRE SHELF & CASTERS
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
262.58
BACKDROPS AND STAND
Page: 32
Packet Page 60 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 33
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
204999 10/17/2013 062693 US BANK
Invoice
PO # Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.40.35.00
179.89
HEAVY DUTY CLAMPS
001.000.41.521.40.35.00
8.69
TABLETOP TRAVEL TRIPOD
001.000.41.521.40.35.00
29.95
REG/COACHING-COUNSEL-HAWLE
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
125.00
REG/COACH ING-COUNSEL-MCCLL
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
125.00
REG/COACHING-COUNSEL-POFF
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
125.00
PKG SCSO MEETING - BARD
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
3.00
FLIP TOP LIDS
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
40.95
STREAMLIGHT FLASHLIGHTS
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
233.28
PKG NWS MEETING -BARD
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
3.00
REG/SOCIAL MEDIA-TRYKAR
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
125.00
REG/SOCIAL MEDIA-D SMITH
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
100.00
TLO SEARCHES 09/2013
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
4.75
3314
INV#3314 10/07/13 EDMONDS PD -
THERMAL REGISTER TAPE (12 PK)
001.000.41.521.11.31.00
40.50
3520
INV#3520 10/07/13 EDMONDS PD -
ADV MTCLY/ROTH/FALK/HARB-MEE
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
72.49
ADV MTCY/ROTH/FALK/HARB-MEAT
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
68.28
ADV MTCY/ROTH/FALK/HARB-FUEL
Page: 33
Packet Page 61 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 34
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code : usbank
Voucher Date Vendor
204999 10/17/2013 062693 US BANK
Invoice PO # Description/Account
Amount
(Continued)
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
70.62
AVD MTCY/ROTH/FALK/HARB-MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
57.48
ADV MTCY/ROTH/FALK/HARB-MEAT
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
33.65
ADV MTCY/ROTH/FALK-LODGING
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
84.70
ADV MTCY/HARBINSON-LODGING
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
84.70
MTG PNWD-IAI/MOORE-MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
8.61
MGT PNWD-IAI/MOORE-MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
20.96
MTG PNWD-IAI/MOORE-FUEL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
72.77
MTG PNWD-IAI/MOORE-PARKING
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
17.00
MTG PNWD-IAI/MOORE-MEAL
001.000.41.521.40.43.00
15.35
FEDEX CHG #13-0897
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
9.96
FEDEX CHG #13-3338
001.000.41.521.10.42.00
15.46
7914 INV#7914 10/07/13 EDMONDS PD -
ORAL BOARD LUNCHES 9/5/13
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
25.90
KINGSTON 32 GB FLASH DRIVES
001.000.41.521.21.31.00
169.50
KINGSTON 16 GB FLASH DRIVES
001.000.41.521.21.31.00
51.22
CR2032 BATTERIES
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
5.44
CR123 BATTERIES
001.000.41.521.22.31.00
44.99
Page: 34
Packet Page 62 of 133
vchlist
Voucher List
Page: 35
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
204999
10/17/2013 062693
US BANK
(Continued)
REG/WAPRO CONF-THOMPSON
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
150.00
RECOGNITION PLAQUE-COMPAAN
001.000.41.521.10.31.00
168.63
DYMO LABEL WRITER
001.000.41.521.21.35.00
114.57
DRY ERASE/CORK BOARD
001.000.41.521.21.31.00
54.74
ENGRAVE RADAR GUN
001.000.41.521.22.48.00
3.83
SAFE FOR ANIMAL CONTROL DRUB
001.000.41.521.70.35.00
99.99
Total:
4,257.04
205000
10/17/2013 062693
US BANK
3249
POSTAGE FOR PASSPORTS
POSTAGE FOR PASSPORTS
001.000.23.512.50.42.00
61.80
TUITION FEE FORA ONLINE TRAIN
001.000.23.512.50.49.00
595.00
Total:
656.80
205001
10/17/2013 062693
US BANK
4697
EDMONDS HOSTED SCC DINNER
Banquet permit for Edmonds hosted
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
10.00
Coffee for city crew participating in
001.000.21.513.10.49.00
10.90
Total:
20.90
205002
10/17/2013 062693
US BANK
5593
CREDIT CARD CHARGES
Notary Renewal Package
001.000.25.514.30.49.00
118.75
Freight
001.000.25.514.30.49.00
10.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.25.514.30.49.00
4.63
Page: 35
Packet
Page 63 of 133
vchlist Voucher List Page: 36
10/17/2013 11:24:19AM City of Edmonds
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
205002
10/17/2013 062693 062693 US BANK
(Continued)
Total:
133.38
205003
10/17/2013 062693 US BANK
3470
DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION
Domain Name Registration -
001.000.31.518.88.49.00
27.90
5855
GFOA WEBINAR D SHARP
Government Finance Officers Associz
001.000.31.514.23.49.00
135.00
Total:
162.90
205004
10/17/2013 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS
(SMS) ELERT 1561353
(SMS) ELERT 1561353 - EDMONDS
SMS CONTENT PRESERVATION - C
001.000.41.521.21.41.00
300.00
Total:
300.00
205005
10/17/2013 069836 VOLT SERVICE GROUP
29889121
WWTP - PART TIME ADMINISTRATI'
WWTP - PART TIME ADMINISTRATI'
423.000.76.535.80.41.00
531.25
Total:
531.25
205006
10/17/2013 074231 VPCI
00001212
LASERFICHE SOFTWARE ASSURA
Laserfiche Software Assurance Plan
001.000.31.518.88.49.00
6,623.38
Total:
6,623.38
205007
10/17/2013 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE
20-1-12701
INV 20-1-12701 ACCT # 23104-001 E
FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR 1 - SACK)
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
750.00
20-1-12739
INV 20-1-12739 EDMONDS PD BLEE
BLEA 695 - PATRICK CLARK
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
2,905.00
BLEA 695 - VAN DOORN
001.000.41.521.40.49.00
2,905.00
Total:
6,560.00
205008
10/17/2013 047605 WA ST TREASURER
3RD QTR 12 REV
EDMONDS FORFEITURES-3RD QTl
REVISED 3RD QTR 2012/FELONY F
Page: 36
Packet Page 64 of 133
vchlist
10/17/2013
11:24:19AM
Voucher List
City of Edmonds
Page: 37
Bank code :
usbank
Voucher
Date Vendor
Invoice PO #
Description/Account
Amount
205008
10/17/2013 047605 WA ST TREASURER
(Continued)
001.000.237.240
99.00
Total:
99.00
205009
10/17/2013 045517 WACA
WACA-SHOEMAKE
WACA CONFERENCE - SHOEMAKE
2011 WACA CONFERENCE - SHOEf
001.000.410.521.400.490.00
130.00
Total:
130.00
205010
10/17/2013 045517 WACA
2013-14 EDMONDSAC
2013-14 MEMBERSHIP DAWSON &
DAWSON 2013-14 MEMBERSHIP
001.000.41.521.70.49.00
35.00
SHOEMAKE 2013-14 MEMBERSHIP
001.000.41.521.70.49.00
35.00
Total:
70.00
205011
10/17/2013 073552 WELCO SALES LLC
6058
INV#6058 - EDMONDS PD (FIR CAF
2,500 FIR CARDS
001.000.41.521.11.31.00
150.00
9.5% Sales Tax
001.000.41.521.11.31.00
14.25
Total:
164.25
140
Vouchers for bank code : usbank
Bank total :
1,097,555.06
140
Vouchers in this report
Total vouchers :
1,097,555.06
Page: 37
Packet Page 65 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Proiect Title
Number
Number
STR
100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade
c329
EOAA
STR
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
c424
E3DC
STM
190th PI SW Wall Construction
c428
E3FF
STR
2009 Street Overlay Program
c294
E9CA
WTR
2010 Waterline Replacement Program
c363
EOJA
STR
2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming
c343
E1AB
WTR
2011 Waterline Replacement Program
c333
E1JA
STM
2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements
c382
E2FE
SWR
2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update
c369
E2GA
SWR
2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach PI/224th St. Sewer Replacement
c347
E1GA
WTR
2012 Waterline Overlay Program
c388
E2CA
WTR
2012 Waterline Replacement Program
c340
E1JE
STM
2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement
c406
E3FA
STM
2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects
c407
E3FB
SWR
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
c398
E3GA
WTR
2013 Waterline Replacement Program
c397
E3JA
WTR
2014 Waterline Replacement Program
c422
E4JA
STR
220 7th Ave N Sidewalk
c421
E3DA
WTR
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
c418
E3J13
STR
226th Street Walkway Project
c312
E9DA
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
5th Ave Overlay Project
c399
E2CC
STR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
WTR
76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood
c344
E1JB
STR
76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project
c245
E6DA
STR
9th Avenue Improvement Project
c392
E2AB
STR
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
c426
E3DE
SWR
Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)
c390
E2GB
WTR
AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements
c324
EOIA
STR
Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project
c256
E6DB
STR
Citywide Safety Improvements
c404
E2AC
SWR
City -Wide Sewer Improvements
c301
EBGD
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 66 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Proiect Title
Number
Number
STM
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
c374
E1 FM
PM
Dayton Street Plaza
c276
E7MA
STM
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
c409
E3FD
WTR
Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study
c345
E1JC
STM
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
c380
E2FC
FAC
Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project
c327
EOLA
STR
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
c342
E1AA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
FAC
Frances Anderson Center Accesibilty Upgrades
c393
EKA
STR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
PM
Interurban Trail
c146
E2DB
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012
c381
E2FD
SWR
Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)
c298
EBGA
STR
Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements
c265
E7AA
WTR
Main Street Watermain
c375
E1JK
PM
Marina Beach Additional Parking
c290
EBMB
STM
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
c378
E2FA
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonement on Puget Drive
c410
EYE
STM
NPDES
m013
E7FG
SWR
OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements
c142
E3GB
WTR
OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)
c141
E3JB
STM
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
c376
E1 FN
STM
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
c408
E3FC
WTR
Pioneer Way Road Repair
c389
E2CB
WTR
PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment
c346
E1JD
STM
Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades
c339
E1 FD
STR
School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant
c420
E3AA
PM
Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements
c321
E9MA
FAC
Senior Center Roof Repairs
c332
EOLB
SWR
Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design
c304
E9GA
WTR
Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update
c370
E1GB
STR
Shell Valley Emergency Access Road
c268
E7CB
STR
SR104 Corridor Transoportation Study
c427
E3AB
General
SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing
c372
ElEA
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 67 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Funding
Proiect Title
Number
Number
General
SR99 Enhancement Program
c238
E6MA
STM
Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects
c341
E1 FF
STM
Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)
c349
E1 FH
STM
Stormwater GIS Support
c326
EOFC
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STM
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
c379
E2FB
STM
SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
c336
E1 FA
STM
Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation
c307
E9FB
STR
Transportation Plan Update
c391
E2AA
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 68 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Proiect
Engineering
Accounting
Proiect
Funding
Number
Number
Proiect Title
WTR
c141
E3JB
OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)
SWR
c142
E3GB
OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements
PM
c146
E2DB
Interurban Trail
General
c238
E6MA
SR99 Enhancement Program
STR
c245
E6DA
76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project
STR
c256
E6DB
Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project
STR
c265
E7AA
Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements
STR
c268
E7CB
Shell Valley Emergency Access Road
PM
c276
E7MA
Dayton Street Plaza
PM
c282
EBMA
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
PM
c290
EBMB
Marina Beach Additional Parking
STR
c294
E9CA
2009 Street Overlay Program
SWR
c298
EBGA
Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)
SWR
c301
EBGD
City -Wide Sewer Improvements
SWR
c304
E9GA
Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design
STM
c307
E9FB
Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation
STR
c312
E9DA
226th Street Walkway Project
PM
c321
E9MA
Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements
WTR
c324
EOIA
AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements
STM
c326
EOFC
Stormwater GIS Support
FAC
c327
EOLA
Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project
STR
c329
EOAA
100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade
FAC
c332
EOLB
Senior Center Roof Repairs
WTR
c333
E1JA
2011 Waterline Replacement Program
STM
c336
E1 FA
SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM
c339
E1 FD
Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades
WTR
c340
E1JE
2012 Waterline Replacement Program
STM
c341
E1 FF
Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects
STR
c342
E1AA
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR
c343
E1AB
2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming
WTR
c344
E1JB
76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood
WTR
c345
E1JC
Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study
WTR
c346
E1JD
PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment
SWR
c347
E1GA
2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach PI/224th St. Sewer Replacement
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 69 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Proiect
Engineering
Accounting
Proiect
Funding
Number
Number
Proiect Title
STM
c349
E1 FH
Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)
STR
c354
E1DA
Sunset Walkway Improvements
WTR
c363
EOJA
2010 Waterline Replacement Program
STR
c368
E1CA
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
SWR
c369
E2GA
2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update
WTR
c370
E1 GB
Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update
General
c372
E1EA
SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing
STM
c374
E1 FM
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
WTR
c375
E1JK
Main Street Watermain
STM
c376
E1 FN
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
STM
c378
E2FA
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
STM
c379
E2FB
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM
c380
E2FC
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
STM
c381
E2FD
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012
STM
c382
E2FE
2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements
WTR
c388
E2CA
2012 Waterline Overlay Program
WTR
c389
E2CB
Pioneer Way Road Repair
SWR
c390
E2GB
Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)
STR
c391
E2AA
Transportation Plan Update
STR
c392
E2AB
9th Avenue Improvement Project
FAC
c393
EKA
Frances Anderson Center Accesibilty Upgrades
WTR
c397
E3JA
2013 Waterline Replacement Program
SWR
c398
E3GA
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
STR
c399
E2CC
5th Ave Overlay Project
STR
c404
E2AC
Citywide Safety Improvements
STR
c405
E2AD
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
STM
c406
E3FA
2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement
STM
c407
E3FB
2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects
STM
c408
E3FC
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
STM
c409
E3FD
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
STM
c410
E3FE
Northstream Pipe Abandonement on Puget Drive
WTR
c418
E3JB
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
STR
c420
E3AA
School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant
STR
c421
E3DA
220 7th Ave N Sidewalk
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 70 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number)
Proiect
Engineering
Accounting
Proiect
Funding
Number
Number
Proiect Title
WTR
c422
E4JA
2014 Waterline Replacement Program
STR
c423
E3DB
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
STR
c424
E3DC
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
STR
c425
E3DD
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
STR
c426
E3DE
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STR
c427
E3AB
SR104 Corridor Transoportation Study
STM
c428
E3FF
190th PI SW Wall Construction
STR
i005
E7AC
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
STM
m013
E7FG
NPDES
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 71 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Project
Funding Number
STR EOAA
Protect
Accounting
Number Project Title
c329 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade
STM EOFC c326 Stormwater GIS
AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements
WTR
EOJA
c363
2010 Waterline Replacement Program
Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project
FAC
EOLB
c332
Senior Center Roof Repairs
e Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
STR
E1AB
c343
2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming
c368
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
STR
E1DA
c354
Sunset Walkway Improvements
General
EW"SR104
Telecommunications Condgg Crossinn
STM
E1 FA
c336
SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements
STM
Public ,ilities Water Quality Upgrades
STM
E1 FF
c341
Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects
STM
E1 FH
_JL c349
Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)
STM
E1 FM
c374
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
E001 OR
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replaceme
SWR
E1GA
c347
2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach PI/224th St. Sewer Replacement
ff—c370
WTR
E1GB
Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update
WTR
E1JA
c333
2011 Waterline Replacement Program
WTR
—A
`;aa
W Waterline Extension with Lvnnwood
WTR
E1JC
c345
Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study
c346
WTR E1JE c340
WTR c375
STR E2AA c391
PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment
2012 Waterline Replacement Program
Main Street Watermain .
Transportation Plan Uodate
Hv�mprove� t
STR E2AC c404 Citywide Safety Improvements
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
WTR E2CA c388 2012 Waterline Overlav Proaram
STR E2CC c399 5th Ave Overlay Project
�M V Interurban
EENEr
STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 72 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
STM
Am
c379
SW�s Basin #3-238th 4MW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
STM
E2FC
c380
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
STM
Wallingelffssociated Projects 2012 Ebb
STM
E2FE
c382
2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements
SW R
c369
2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update
SW R
E2GB
c390
Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)
S
School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Gra
STR
E3AB
c427
SR104 Corridor Transoportation Study
220 7th Ave N Sidewalk
STR
E3DB
c423
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
15th St. SW Walkwa ve)
STR
E3DD
c425
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
STM
E3FA
c406
2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement
OF c407
2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projec
STM
E3FC
c408
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
09
Dayton Street Storm Wprovements (6th Ave - 8th Ave
STM
E3FE
c410
Northstream Pipe Abandonement on Puget Drive
190th PI SW Wall Construction
SWR
E3GA
c398
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
OVD Sewer Late
WTR
E3JA
c397
2013 Waterline Replacement Program
4th Waterline Relocation (2013)
WTR
E3JB
c141
OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)
FAC
IFFIEffFrances
Anderson Center Accesibilty Upgrades
WTR
E4JA
c422
2014 Waterline Replacement Program
STR
E6DA
76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkwa
STR
E6DB
c256
Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project
General
E6MA
SR99 Enhancement Program
STR
E7AA
c265
Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements
STR
St. SW Corridmrovements
STR
E7CB
c268
Shell Valley Emergency Access Road
STM
m013
NPDES
PM
E7MA
c276
Dayton Street Plaza
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 73 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number)
Engineering
Protect
Protect
Accounting
Funding
Number
Number
Protect Title
SWR
E8GA
c298 _
Lift Station 2 Improvements (mated from Us 13 - 09101/08)
SWR
E8GD
c301
City -Wide Sewer Improvements
PM
+ E8MA
Mr
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corrid
PM
E8MB
c290
Marina Beach Additional Parking
E9CAJ1W
c294
2009 Street Overlay Program
STIR
E91DA
c312
226th Street Walkway Project
Ibot Rd. Stqjffi,@jain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation
SWR
E9GA
c304
Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design
c321
Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 74 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Fundinq
Protect Title
Number
Number
FAC
Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project
c327
EOLA
FAC
Senior Center Roof Repairs
c332
EOLB
FAC
Frances Anderson Center Accesibilty Upgrades
c393
EKA
General
SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing
c372
E1EA
General
SR99 Enhancement Program
c238
E6MA
PM
Interurban Trail
c146
E2DB
PM
Dayton Street Plaza
c276
E7MA
PM
Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
c282
EBMA
PM
Marina Beach Additional Parking
c290
EBMB
PM
Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements
c321
E9MA
STM
Stormwater GIS Support
c326
EOFC
STM
SW Edmonds-1 05th/1 06th Ave W Storm Improvements
c336
E1FA
STM
Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades
c339
E1 FD
STM
Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects
c341
E1FF
STM
Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)
c349
E1 FH
STM
Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives
c374
E1 FM
STM
Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement
c376
E1 FIN
STM
Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study
c380
E2FC
STM
2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements
c382
E21FE
STM
2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement
c406
E3FA
STM
2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects
c407
E3FB
STM
Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study
c408
E3FC
STM
Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)
c409
E3FD
STM
Northstream Pipe Abandonement on Puget Drive
c410
E3FE
STM
190th PI SW Wall Construction
c428
E3FF
STM
NPDES
m013
E7FG
STM
Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation
c307
E9FB
STM
North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements
c378
E2FA
STM
SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System
c379
E2FB
STM
Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012
c381
E2FD
STIR
100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade
c329
EOAA
STIR
Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)
c342
E1AA
STIR
2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming
c343
E1AB
STIR
76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements
c368
E1CA
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 75 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Fundinq
Protect Title
Number
Number
STR
Sunset Walkway Improvements
c354
E1 DA
STR
Transportation Plan Update
c391
E2AA
STR
9th Avenue Improvement Project
c392
E2AB
STR
Citywide Safety Improvements
c404
E2AC
STR
Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)
c405
E2AD
STR
5th Ave Overlay Project
c399
E2CC
STR
School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant
c420
E3AA
STR
SR104 Corridor Transoportation Study
c427
E3AB
STR
220 7th Ave N Sidewalk
c421
E3DA
STR
238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)
c423
E3DB
STR
15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)
c424
E3DC
STR
236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)
c425
E3DD
STR
ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S
c426
E3DE
STR
76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project
c245
E6DA
STR
Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project
c256
E6DB
STR
Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements
c265
E7AA
STR
228th St. SW Corridor Improvements
i005
E7AC
STR
Shell Valley Emergency Access Road
c268
E7CB
STR
2009 Street Overlay Program
c294
E9CA
STR
226th Street Walkway Project
c312
E9DA
SWR
2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach PI/224th St. Sewer Replacement
c347
E1GA
SWR
2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update
c369
E2GA
SWR
Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)
c390
E2GB
SWR
2013 Sewerline Replacement Project
c398
E3GA
SWR
OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements
c142
E3GB
SWR
Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)
c298
EBGA
SWR
City -Wide Sewer Improvements
c301
EBGD
SWR
Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design
c304
E9GA
WTR
AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements
c324
EOIA
WTR
2010 Waterline Replacement Program
c363
EOJA
WTR
Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update
c370
E1GB
WTR
2011 Waterline Replacement Program
c333
E1JA
WTR
76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood
c344
E1JB
WTR
Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study
c345
E1JC
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 76 of 133
PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title)
Project
Engineering
Accounting
Project
Fundinq
Protect Title
Number
Number
WTR
PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment
c346
E1JD
WTR
2012 Waterline Replacement Program
c340
E1JE
WTR
Main Street Watermain
c375
E1JK
WTR
2012 Waterline Overlay Program
c388
E2CA
WTR
Pioneer Way Road Repair
c389
E2CB
WTR
2013 Waterline Replacement Program
c397
E3JA
WTR
224th Waterline Relocation (2013)
c418
E3J13
WTR
OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)
c141
E3J13
WTR
2014 Waterline Replacement Program
c422
E4JA
Revised 10/17/2013
Packet Page 77 of 133
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 624 (10/01/2013 to 10/15/2013)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
111
ABSENT
NO PAY LEAVE
59.75
0.00
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
594.50
18,552.56
122
VACATION
VACATION
746.30
24,989.46
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
99.00
2,774.36
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
33.00
1,050.65
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
94.00
2,941.85
129
SICK
Police Sick Leave L & 1
6.00
239.42
130
COMP HOURS
Holiday Compensation Used
3.50
104.16
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kelly Day Used
134.50
4,912.13
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
62.27
2,594.27
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
16,157.45
547,742.17
196
REGULAR HOURS
LIGHT DUTY
74.00
3,090.39
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
5.00
171.11
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
36.00
1,578.80
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
10.00
914.05
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
298.00
17,208.67
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
12.75
809.17
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
0.00
92.34
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
1,013.83
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
203.73
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP
69.75
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME
137.25
0.00
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
23.56
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
161.90
boc
MISCELLANEOUS
BOC 11 Certification
0.00
80.05
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
137.44
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
589.30
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
95.89
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
923.69
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
736.66
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
834.14
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
4,513.11
fmis
SICK
FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK
18.00
638.00
fmly
VACATION
Family Medical Leave Vacation
40.00
875.12
10/17/2013 Page 1 of 2
Packet Page 78 of 133
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 624 (10/01/2013 to 10/15/2013)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
103.08
Iq1
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
1,919.19
Iq2
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 4%
0.00
1,393.14
Iq3
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY 6%
0.00
4,669.31
Iq4
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1 %
0.00
347.19
Iq5
LONGEVITY
Longevity 3%
0.00
66.98
Iq6
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv .5%
0.00
300.45
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Longevity 1.5%
0.00
691.19
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
191.78
ooc
MISCELLANEOUS
5% OUT OF CLASS
0.00
239.28
pds
MISCELLANEOUS
Public Disclosure Specialist
0.00
44.66
phv
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
1,574.10
prof
MISCELLANEOUS
PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SER
0.00
147.00
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5%
0.00
290.85
sqt
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
147.00
slw
SICK
SICK LEAVE ADD BACK
80.00
0.00
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
302.03
18,771.02 $653,019.21
Total Net Pay: $446,578.82
10/17/2013 Page 2 of 2
Packet Page 79 of 133
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 624 - 10/01/2013 to 10/15/2013
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
60536
10/18/2013
mebt
AST TTEE
75,079.16
0.00
60537
10/18/2013
epoa2
EPOA-POLICE
2,808.00
0.00
60538
10/18/2013
epoa3
EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT
436.50
0.00
60539
10/18/2013
flex
FLEX -PLAN SERVICES, INC
399.83
0.00
60540
10/18/2013
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
3,011.05
0.00
60541
10/18/2013
teams
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763
4,135.00
0.00
60542
10/18/2013
icma
VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884
2,015.57
0.00
60543
10/18/2013
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
17,282.00
0.00
105,167.11
0.00
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
2031 10/18/2013 front FRONTIER BANK 87,915.86 0.00
2033 10/18/2013 flex FLEX -PLAN SERVICES, INC 164.40 0.00
88,080.26 0.00
Grand Totals: 193,247.37 0.00
10/17/2013 Page 1 of 1
Packet Page 80 of 133
AM-6231
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time: Consent
Submitted By: Linda Hynd
Department:
Review Committee:
Type:
City Clerk's Office
Action
Information
Committee Action:
4. C.
Subject Title
Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages from Michelle Baillet and Guy Fineout (amount
undetermined), Christy Cufley, on behalf of Point Edwards appellants ($1,333.00), and Gary Reynolds
($500,000.00).
Recommendation
Acknowledge receipt of the Claims for Damages by minute entry.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Narrative
Michelle Baillet and Guy Fineout
107 Bell Street
Suite 102
Edmonds, WA 98026
(Amount undetermined)
Christy Cufley
51 Pine Street
Unit 309
Edmonds, WA 98020
($1,333.00)
Gary Reynolds
20212 Maplewood Drive
Edmonds, WA 98026
($500,000.00)
Attachments
Baillet & Fineout Claim for Damages
Cufley Claim for Damages
Packet Page 81 of 133
Reynolds Claim for Damages
Inbox
Mayor
Finalize for Agenda
Fonn Started By: Linda Hynd
Final Approval Date: 10/17/2013
Form Review
Reviewed By
Date
Dave Earling
10/17/2013 01:18 PM
Sandy Chase
10/17/2013 01:22 PM
Started On: 10/15/2013 04:33 PM
Packet Page 82 of 133
RECEIVED
CITY OF EI)MONI)S OCT 112013
C"LAIM FOR I)ANIAGES FORM 9 7 �
Received by City
M��h211�, �AI\61�+-y �tnut- of -
�n�
Please take not- thab Q J4v COIN OTIYIIUYh I;;IIf! irrentlyfi+k dev at ?d1 &UA+f- 162-
Edmovldsmudi
-�z [j il�ailin•r address
WA qD2.0 hone �hGn? �44 ..- `` wroIk PIIone 4 and ->vho resided gat j
02 GGu{rnQ Y► bat t{12 time of the cccuuence and whose date Of birth I s claiming darnaaes
a• fainst � S in the stun of $ e a Q(�I iYlil rising cut Of the follee^,+inn cilanllstances listed belov�
DATE OF OCCURRENCE r(46i 4, PWALS't 2q.2D
LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE 164j &;
DESCRIPTION:
TIME: lot2, I ftemwyy
Pd m ohds, WA 9U2-0
1 Describe the conduct and circumstan:;e that blouaht about tip. Infrlly c•r• damage. Also describe the injuly ci dalnane..
� IPP L�iYY1
(attach an extra sheet for additional information, it needed)
2 Prc•vide a list Of ,:+itnesses. if applicable, to the OCcurrence includina names, addresses, and Phone numbers
ee aftchmprtt
t Attach copies of all documentation relatina tc• expenses, injuries, losses. and:'or estimates tot repair
4 Have YOU submitted a claim fol damanes to your insurance company? Yes NO
If so, please provide the name of the insurance company:
and the policy t:
lee a tfa c �►� � f.
' ' ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY "
License Plate w _—_
Driver License
Type Aut;•
yeari (makei
;mcdeli
DRIVER' ^.
_ OWNER:
Address:
Address:
Phone»
Phcnew. ��
Passengers:
Name:
Name:
Add ess:
Address_ —
I nn) R".6,,J fi-iI r,iix,
1'a, , i i ,l '
Packet Page 83 of 133
* * NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * '
I, M5- M012,11el' &I I I e , being first duly sworn, depose and say Mal I am the claimant for the above
described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe tl"ine to be true.
x -
Signature of Claimants)
State of Washington
County of L_/za
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thatAls M►cAe1]1? At; Ile t is the person who appeared before me, and said
person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his.Mer) free and voluntary act for the uses and
Purposes mentioned in the instrument �ti�,.r.�'+H�►�►++►+3��l+
Dated: / G - // - a o /3=$lbly"rf�►r{�'�ir
Signature ' •'
�/��
Mti appointment expires: 4�'+�rg11 L ••''��'
Please present the completed claim form to
Fonn Wvised07116/09
City Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
121 51h Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 58020
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Page 2 of 2
Packet Page 84 of 133
ATTACHMENT
Preamble
This claim is being brought by the One "O" Seven Condominium Association ("Association") on
behalf of the three current members of the Associations:
Mr. and Mrs. Jack McRae - (Unit #101) - 107 Bell St., Unit #101, Edmonds, WA 98020;
Mrs. Baillet and Mr. Fineout - (Unit #102) - 107 Bell St., Unit #102, Edmonds, WA 98020;
Mr. Robert Comstock - (Unit #200) - 107 Bell St., Unit #200, Edmonds, WA 98020.
The members each reside at 107 Bell Street, Edmonds at the specific unit numbers outlined above.
Item #1- City of Edmonds- Claim for Damazes Form
Issue: Water intrusion into one of the lower units occurred after torrential rains were experienced on
August 29, 2013 in Edmonds and after the city storm system — being filled to capacity — drained into
the lower unit of One "O" Seven Condominium, Unit #102.
City storm drains adjacent to the complex had backed -up and brought sand/dirt into the condominium
storm drain system causing blockage of the condominium storm drain system which, in turn, caused
water to flow into unit #102.
Water was forced into the subject unit in two closets along the interior wall of the master bedroom
and under the exterior door on opposite wall.
The Association took immediate action — including having Roto-Rooter jet the condominium storm
drain system and it retained Premier Emergency Water Removal to take immediate remediation
measures. Also, the Association timely filed claims with the appropriate insurance companies.
Premier Emergency Water Removal was asked to evaluate the situation. Premier personnel stated that
the problem was likely a recurring one (they detected the presence of mold and moisture in the unit.)
According to Premier personnel, this is likely the result of earlier events where the City storm system
had previously been backed -up. For example: two years ago there was another backup.
All flooring (carpet, pad and strips) was removed by Premier personnel as well as affected drywall
and insulation — up to four feet in some areas. Dehumidifiers and fans were placed in Unit #102 and
also in the storage unit of Unit #101. The enclosed invoice from Premier Emergency Water Removal
covers all of the above -described efforts.
Partial compensation was recently received from: Oregon Mutual Insurance Company (Condominium
Association policy) and Pemco Insurance (policy of Unit Owner -Unit #102.) The Association also
obtained a bid from Grove Hill Construction, LLC to perform the necessary inside remedial work.
1 The association has been in existence since 1993.
Packet Page 85 of 133
The Association is asking for compensation from the city for all unreimbursed costs that were
incurred because of the above -described problem with the City's storm drain system.
See some specific scene information regarding the August 29th flooding that was experienced in
downtown Edmonds at the following web address:
http://myedmondsnews. com/2013/08/scene-edmonds-floodwaters-hit-downtown-
edmonds/`?utm gotircc=lyiy+Edmonds+News+List&utm cwn12aigti=a462dbe283-
RSS EMAIL CAMPAIGN&utm medium=emails&utm term=0 f85a975e8e-a462dbe283-
328209569
Compensation Request
Total costs incurred:
Premier Emergency Water Removal $5,805.69 (Exhibit 1)
Grove Hill Construction LLC bid $6,022.99 — work not yet begun (Exhibit 2)
Roto Rooter $1,439.92 (Exhibit 3)
Storage Court $560.00 (Exhibit 4)
Attorney's Fees $1,000.00 -- estimated
Five thousand dollars each has been received from two insurance companies providing coverage. (See
item #4 below.)
Claimant is asking for compensation to the extent that its' costs exceed those amounts received from
the two insurance companies indicated above.
Claimant also requests that the City of Edmonds upsize and improve the subject storm drainage
system such that from this point forward, the City's system is made capable of handling all flows in
the immediate area of 107 Bell Street
Item #2 - City of Edmonds- Claim for Damages Form - Witnesses
Mr. and Mrs. Jack McRae —Unit 101, phone: 509-687-8419
Mr. Michelle Baillet and Mr. Guy Fineout — Unit 102, phone: 206-324-9673
Mr. Robert and Brian Comstock — Unit 200, phone: 425-417-9040
Mr. Jim Rumppe- Senior Claims Adjuster, from Oregon Mutual Insurance Co., phone: 503-565-2881
Mr. John Hart —Adjuster Claim Department, Pemco Insurance, phone: 800-467-3626, ext: 7759
Roto- Rooter-4200 196th St SW #100 Lynnwood, WA, phone: 425-712-4120
Grove Hill Construction, LLC-19211 40th Place, NE, Lake Forest Park, phone: 206-387-2827
Premier Emergency Water Removal-106 Pike Street, NE, Auburn, phone: 253-939-3682
Storage Court-23031 Highway 99, Edmonds, 98026, phone: 425-329-3588
Packet Page 86 of 133
Item #4 — Insurance Coverage
Claims submitted to -and amounts received from -the affected insurance companies:
Insurer
Insured
Policy No.
Amounts Received
Oregon Mutual
Association
BSP350818
$5000
Insurance Co.
Pemco Insurance
Baillet- Fineout
H01257358
$5000
Company
For additional details, see Exhibits 5a and 5b which are copies of checks and explanatory letters
issued by Oregon Mutual Insurance Co. and Pemco Insurance Co. respectively.
Packet Page 87 of 133
Christy Cufley
51 Pine Street Unit 309
Edmonds, WA 98020
christycufleyCa)yahoo.com 425-967-3666
October 14, 2013
Kernen Lien, Senior Planner
RECEIVED
CCT 112013
City of Edmonds
Development Services Department -Planning Division DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
121 5tn Avenue North COUNTER
Edmonds, WA 98020
RE Appeal of Type III B Decision of the Architectural Design Board Regarding
PLN20130022 -- Point Edwards Building 10 located at 50 Pine Street --
Request for Reimbursement
Dear Mr. Lien -
On July 2, 2013, 1 appeared as the lead appellant in the above -referenced matter along with our
attorney, scores and scores of other parties of record and appellants, and other observers. In
anticipation of addressing the Council, many of those present had spent substantial time and
effort preparing three -minute statements per the previously announced guidelines.
However, Carol Morris, special legal counsel for the City, advised that none of us would be able
to address the Council because she had contacted the applicant and they had agreed with her
proposal to remand the matter to the Architectural Design Board (ADB) for issuance of written
findings of fact and conclusions of law. Prior to the July 2"d meeting, Ms. Morris had also alerted
the Council members regarding her recommendation (at least one such contact occurred on
Sunday, June 30t" with Ms. Petso).
Contrary to Ms. Morris' flippant and dismissive comments on July 2, 2013 that the appellants
were not prejudiced by the continuance, and without seeking any input from the appellants
whatsoever, the appellants in fact have been prejudiced. We have had to pay for legal costs for
preparation for the hearing which would not have been otherwise incurred. Why would legal
counsel notify and alert only one of the interested parties (the applicant) as well as the Council
members without similarly advising our attorney? As you may imagine, this creates a great deal
of frustration and concern about the process. The actions of Ms. Morris essentially constitute an
inappropriate ex parte contact, and her failure to notify ALL interested parties raises reasonable
concerns and legitimate questions as to the actual fairness of this process. A process must not
only be fair, it must appear to be fair.
As documented by the transcript of the minutes of the May 15, 2013 Council meeting, as well as
by the attached correspondence from our legal counsel, no such advance notification was
provided to the appellants. Thus, all of our hard work and preparation was for naught. The
failure of Ms. Morris to notify our attorney has resulted in a quantifiable monetary loss.
Accordingly, we are requesting that we be reimbursed for our monetary costs in the amount of
$1,333. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
S1nc4y,
Chri(on be alf of Point Edwards appellants)
Packet Page 88 of 133
PURCELL & ADAMS, PLLC
ATTORNEYS
7127 196" Street SW Office (425) 774-0444
Suite 201 Facsimile (425) 771-2711
DOUGLAS W. PURCELL Lynnwood, WA 98036 Email: dpuicell@purcelladams.com
October 14, 2013
REC I 6 ' '
SENT VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL ACT 14 201.3
DEVELOPMEN;l S,Ly,, ir;
Christy Cufley 10OW"ITE; ),
51 Pine Street RECEIVED
Unit 309
Edmonds, WA 98020 O C T 15 2 01 3
Re: Point Edwards
EDMONDS CITY CLERK
Dear Christy:
You have requested an accounting of the amount paid by your group for attorneys' fees
related to the preparation for and attendance at the July 2, 2013 appeal hearing before the
Edmonds City Council. It is my understanding that you wish to make a claim to the City for
those fees, resulting from the fact that, while special counsel for the City met with the Applicant
and Applicant's counsel prior to that hearing, and, in doing so, developed a strategy which made
my preparation for and attendance at the meeting unnecessary, we were provided no advance
notice, either to you, as appellant, or to me as an attorney who had appeared on your behalf.
In reviewing my records, it would appear to me that the preparation time on the day
before the hearing and preparation and attendance on July 2, 2013 encompassed 4.3 hours, at my
regular rate of $310 per hour, for a total of $1,333.00. I would note that the meeting with the
Applicant did not happen until sometime the Friday before or over the weekend, so I have not
included additional preparation time from the prior week. I would, however, also note that, due
to the decision by the special City Attorney, the preparation for the July 2, hearing became
largely irrelevant, and so was a total loss.
Let me know if you need any further information.
Very truly yours,
PURCELL & ADAMS
y
Qougi s' W. Purcell
Packet Page 89 of 133
ECEIVED
R
CITY OF EDMONDS
OCT 112013 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM
�m (�j�('� 11 Date Claim Form
EDMONDS a � CIM Received by City
Please take note that (nP1VL4 who currently resides at tACA-i' le-4-'0c —•
CC%".s-,A,-) OP. • 9 $ bLl mailing addressi{.o`1 Z3 L,n"t4VJoawA qs$0-1 lfl
home phone # Ii S. R11. (oD2-1 , work phone # , and who resided at 2y2 t Z
DR • ) V*• q`CO210 at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is—, is claiming damages
against C%�!)- C—AA uJk Elff> in thesumof $ S'N>, c "" arising out of the following circumstances listed below.
DATE OF OCCURRENCE:3' 14 - 2-0 3 `1 3 - j5 - Zt 3 TIME: Se - A 4+ a6NH f (- ' --S
LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: 2,02-k2 Pk1LP1e W0Q& 1W. , • 9 F OZ(.p
If
DESCRIPTION:
1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage.
See Par1-oacln W1 eti'�
(attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed)
2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers.
f�rcis N2ri►.lo�w-d�Z Ca(-}e S, , 2JL1Z tl..�aplcw00 �a�. EEMa'�cLS Ir�p, . °1iso2lo
r4�ti\ram. tar �ci.*-1�,4-.w� 1-t.013 1A. \1 tew a. . WA . ''1$Z01 Ll2-6 .ZLILI. X23 to
3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair.
4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? Yes K No
If so, please provide the name of the insurance company:
and the policy #:
* * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REOUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY
License Plate # Driver License #
Type Auto
(year) (make) (model)
DRIVER: OWNER:
Address: Address:
Phone#: Phone#:
Passengers:
Name: Name:
Address: Address:
Form Revised 07/16/09
Packet Page 90 of 133
Page 1 of 2
* NOTE: THIS FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND NOTARIZED * "
I, _ GAf'— J I? L_,>�o being first duly sworn, depose and say that I am the claimant for the above
described; that I have read the above claim, know the contents thereof and believe the same to be true.
x
y
Signature of Claimant(s)
State of Was ton
County of i, " CA
I certify that I know or ffave satisfactory evidence thatQhis the person who appeared before me, and said
person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and cknowled ed it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the uses and
purposes mentioned in the instrument. _
Title
My appointment
�-7.2OL7
Please present the completed claim form to:
Form Revised 07/16/09
City Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
121 51h Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 98020
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
NO►fAA'Y PUBW
STATE OF WAGM000TION
LAuW0 A. fAWOCK
Nry�anrr�neE�II►
MAY 7, E017
Page 2 of 2
Packet Page 91 of 133
CHOCAP
I L ATW
VIA USPS Certified
October 10, 2013
City Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
1215th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 98020
RE: Gary Reynolds
Dear City of Edmonds:
Enclosed, please find Gary Reynold's Claim for Damages Form and Attachments. Please direct
all correspondence in this matter to my office at Choi Capital Law PLLC, 520 Pike Street, Suite
975, Seattle, Washington 98101.
Sincerely,
�
Vanessa Ish
v.ish@choicapitallaw.com
CHOI CAPITAL LAW PLLC
520 Pike Street, Suite 975 1 Seattle, Washington 98101 1 Tel: 206-588-0463 1 Fax: 206-971-1650
www.choicapitallaw.com
Packet Page 92 of 133
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. The incidents pertaining to this claim occurred on March 14, 2013 and March 15, 2013 at
the residence of Gary Reynolds ("Mr. Reynolds") located at 20212 Maplewood Drive,
Edmonds, Washington, 98026. Mr. Reynolds is a retired police officer from the Seattle
Police Department.
2. At the time of the incidents described herein, Gary Reynolds was a 61 year -old Caucasian
male who had been just separated from his wife of 39 years 4 months prior to the
incidents. His adult son died from cancer just 5 months prior to the incidents.
3. Mr. Reynolds was employed by Compass Health as a medical technician during the
incidents described herein.
FIRST INCIDENT:
4. On March 14th, 2013, Mr. Reynolds called 911 for help restraining a female, Tracie
Hernandez-Cortes ("Ms. Cortes"), a guest at his home who had a "mental break" after
finding out that her minor daughter had been sexually abused. In response to the 911
call, the City of Edmonds Police ("EPD") arrived to find the female wandering Mr.
Reynolds's neighborhood covered only in a blanket.
5. Officer Don Kinney ("Officer Kinney") was first to arrive at the scene and approached
Ms. Cortes who was at the porch of Mr. Reynolds's neighbor, disheveled and staring at
the ground. The Edmonds City Police quickly called for medical aid to transport Ms.
Cortes to a local hospital. Upon the EMT's arrival, Officer Ross Sutton ("Officer
1
Packet Page 93 of 133
Sutton") and Officer Kinney approached Mr. Reynolds, who was standing in his
driveway, for questioning.
6. The Officers questioned Mr. Reynolds about Ms. Cortes's behavior, and Mr. Reynolds
started to explain, but as Mr. Reynolds described the situation, he realized that the
Officers were becoming exceedingly hostile towards him.
7. The Officers conducted a search of the exterior of Mr. Reynolds's home and noticed
broken glass in the driveway. The Officers asked questions about the glass to which Mr.
Reynolds explained that Ms. Cortes had broken a wine bottle and a lamp the previous
night when her mental breakdown began.
8. The Officers asked Mr. Reynolds if anyone else was staying in the home, and Mr.
Reynolds told them that Ms. Cortes's friend, Ashley Herrington ("Ms. Herrington") was
also at the house. When Mr. Reynolds expressed that he was not comfortable answering
anymore questions because of the intensely hostile line of questioning by the Officers,
they entered Mr. Reynolds's home. The Officers did not have a warrant nor did they seek
Mr. Reynolds's consent to enter the home. Upon entering his home, the officers
continued with the hostile line of questioning. At one point, Officer Sutton shouted at
Mr. Reynolds "sit your ass down!" Mr. Reynolds was read his Miranda rights during
this interrogation in his home.
9. After reading Mr. Reynolds his Miranda rights, the Officers accused Mr. Reynolds of
"drugging young women" and "running a house of prostitution." Mr. Reynolds,
appalled and confused by the bizarre accusations, denied the allegations and told the
officers that he was "totally anti -drug."
Packet Page 94 of 133
10. Mr. Reynolds also explained that, on March 13, 2013, Ms. Cortes found out that her
estranged husband may have sexually abused her six -year -old daughter, which initiated
her mental breakdown. Mr. Reynolds also repeatedly asked that they contact Lynnwood
Officer Rickman to verify these facts because Officer Rickman took the molestation
report from Ms. Cortes that day. The officers never contacted Officer Rickman.
11. Officer Sutton continued to shout and scream accusations in Mr. Reynolds's face and told
him to "keep his ass seated."
12. Ashley Herrington ("Ms. Herrington"), a friend of Ms. Cortes who was staying over
with her, came downstairs. Mr. Reynolds encouraged the EPD officers to speak with Ms.
Herrington to confirm that Mr. Reynolds was neither "drugging women" nor "running a
house of prostitution." Ms. Herrington explained to the Officers that Ms. Cortes's
behavior started when she had a fight with her estranged husband the night before
regarding her daughter. Ms. Herrington confirmed the information that Mr. Reynolds
provided to the Officers regarding Ms. Cortes. Officer John Cameron ("Officer
Cameron") also joined the other Officers at the scene during the interrogation inside Mr.
Reynolds home. Officer Cameron conducted a room -by -room search without a warrant.
No incriminating evidence was found during the search. However, the Officers'
extremely hostile interrogation and slinging of baseless accusations continued.
13. Embarrassed and afraid, Mr. Reynolds repeatedly informed the officers that he was not a
criminal and pled with the officers not to alert the neighbors. However, immediately
after Mr. Reynolds asserted his concerns about alerting the neighbors, Officer Kinney and
Sutton bolted out of the door; Officer Kinney stated "I think I know the doctor who lives
Packet Page 95 of 133
on the left." Officer Kinney then began pounding on the neighbor's front door while
Officer Sutton cut through the shrubs to the neighbor on the right and began pounding on
that neighbor's door. The content of the discussions between these two neighbors and the
officers is unknown.
14. The records produced by the City of Edmonds Police show that Officer Kinney went to
the Swedish ER on March 15, 2013, where Ms. Cortes had been involuntarily booked and
transferred immediately after leaving Mr. Reynolds's home. According to the records,
Ms. Cortes was awake but spoke gibberish and made many nonsensical statements about
God and Santa Claus. (See Attachment, Officer Kinney's Police Report). Ms. Cortes
stated that she was afraid for her daughter while laughing and crying, and asked Officer
Kinney to leave. (Id.) Officer Kinney's report indicates that that while he was uncertain
about what actually happened to Ms. Cortes, there was no clear evidence of any
wrongdoing or illegal activity by Mr. Reynolds's. Before leaving the hospital, Officer
Kinney, requested the hospital keep him informed regarding any developments pertaining
to Ms. Cortes.
SECOND INCIDENT:
15. On March 15, 2013, Officer Bower contacted the on -duty mental health professional at
the Swedish ER, Michael Faltisco, to check on Ms. Cortes, and received the information
that Ms. Cortes's toxicology report came back clear; confirming that Mr. Reynolds did
not drug Ms. Cortes as the Officers had accused.
16. After conducting additional investigation, the Officers did discover that both Ms. Cortes
and Ms. Herrington were residents at Haven House, where Mr. Reynolds was employed.
4
Packet Page 96 of 133
Officer Bower went to Haven House on March 15, 2013 to speak with Ms. Lyndal
Walker ("Ms. Walker"), Haven House office manager, about the two women. Officer
Bower discovered Ms. Cortes had been "released" from Haven House on March 12, 2013
as she was no longer a patient there. Ms. Cortes was kicked out for neglecting her dish
duties and told she needed to find a new place by March 31, 2013. During his visit to
Haven House, Officer Bower described the incidents at Mr. Reynolds's home to Ms.
Walker, which caused the Haven House to initiate its own investigation. Based on the
Haven House's investigation, Mr. Reynolds was terminated from his employment.
17. During the discussion between Officer Bower and Ms. Walker on March 15, 2013, Ms.
Walker alleged that another resident of Haven House, Jillian Mae Knott ("Ms. Knott"),
was missing from the facility as of March 14, 2013. Without any further investigation
and with no additional information, the EPD used this information as the basis for
conducting an unlawful search and arrest of Mr. Reynolds.
18. On March 15, 2013, after the visit with Ms. Walker at the Haven House, the EPD began
conducting surveillance of Mr. Reynolds's home without a warrant. Officer Doug
Compton ("Officer Compton") and Corporal Greenmun of the EPD conducted the
surveillance.
19. On March 15, 2013, at approximately 6:30 p.m., Mr. Reynolds returned home after a
shopping trip to Costco. Officer Compton, who was nearby in an unmarked police
vehicle conducting surveillance of the home, immediately pulled up behind Mr. Reynolds
in his driveway blocking the only exit. Once Mr. Reynolds was blocked in the driveway,
Officer Compton got out of the unmarked police vehicle and approached Mr. Reynolds,
5
Packet Page 97 of 133
pushed him up against his car, and frisked him. After being frisked, Mr. Reynolds was
handcuffed and read his Miranda rights. Mr. Reynolds was then placed in the back of
Officer Bower's marked police vehicle. Officer Bower had arrived by this time to provide
backup for Officer Compton.
20. Once Mr. Reynolds was detained in his driveway, Officers Compton and Bower began
interrogating Mr. Reynolds as he remained handcuffed in the back of the police car.
There was still no warrant for Mr. Reynolds's arrest. Mr. Reynolds asked to speak with
his attorney. His request was ignored.
21. When Mr. Reynolds asked why he was being arrested, Officer Bower told Mr. Reynolds
that he was under arrest for "first degree assault," and that he was being investigated for
"abduction." When Mr. Reynolds asked if the officers had a valid warrant for the arrest,
he was told that a warrant was "being applied for."
22. Officer Bower refused to answer Mr. Reynolds's questions regarding the accusations
against him including the identity of the individual he allegedly abducted.
23. Sergeant Michael Richardson ("Sergeant Richardson"), the on -duty supervisor for the
EPD, arrived on the scene and joined in interrogating Mr. Reynolds. Moments later,
Detective Smith called Officer Bower regarding the requested warrant to inform that the
warrant requested by Detective Aaron Frausto ("Detective Frausto") was denied by the
District Prosecuting Attorney Cornell ("DPA Cornell"). The information regarding the
denied warrant issuance was relayed to all the officers who were at the scene of Mr.
Reynolds's driveway. However, even after the officers were informed about the denial,
they continued to interrogate Mr. Reynolds while he remained handcuffed and seated in
C.
Packet Page 98 of 133
the back of the police car. Additionally, the officers proceeded, once again, to search the
home of Mr. Reynolds without a warrant.
24. According to the EPD police reports, the EPD Officers wrongly claim that Mr. Reynolds
consented to the search of his home. This is untrue. The Officers demanded that Mr.
Reynolds allow them to search his home while he was still handcuffed in the back of the
police car. Only after Mr. Reynolds acquiesced to allow the officers to search his home,
did Officer Compton remove the handcuffs and allow Mr. Reynolds to exit the back of
the police car. The EPD officers once again conducted a room -by -room search of Mr.
Reynolds's home without a warrant, and found nothing and no one inside the home.
25. Mr. Reynolds asked Sergeant Richardson for the name of the detective in charge and
Sergeant Richardson gave him a business card and a piece of paper with the handwritten
names of Detective Smith and Detective Frausto. EPD officers got into their police cars
and exited the property where Mr. Reynolds remained, so traumatized that he could not
stop shaking, and where he faced stares from neighbors who, to this day, no longer speak
to him.
26. After the two unlawful searches and seizures, Mr. Reynolds was fired from Compass
Health and he has been ostracized by his neighbors and his landlord.
27. The traumatic experience from the two incidents has resulted necessitating on -going
psychiatric and psychological treatment.
28. Mr. Reynolds, who is a retired police officer from Seattle Police Department, has a long
history of depression, post -traumatic stress syndrome, and thoughts of suicide. In
addition, at the time of these two incidents, Mr. Reynolds was going through various
7
Packet Page 99 of 133
personal traumas including the recent loss of his adult son to cancer and the end of his
marriage of 39 years when his wife abandoned him with no warning immediately after
their son's death. In addition to the psychological damage, Mr. Reynolds has physical
manifestations of his depression, anxiety and stress from this incident. Since the incident,
he has been diagnosed with shingles, a painful condition that manifests itself in
individuals under severe stress with weakened immune systems; and Bell's palsy, which
is a form of facial paralysis.
29. In its failure to comply with not only police procedures, but also with Federal and State
law requiring that police obtain warrants based on probable cause before placing citizens
under arrest and searching their homes, EPD violated Mr. Reynolds's rights as a U.S.
citizen and as a resident of the State of Washington.
9
Packet Page 100 of 133
AM-6238
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time: Consent
Submitted By: Stephen Clifton
Department:
Review Committee:
Type:
Community Services
Information
Information
Committee Action:
4. D.
Subject Title
Community Services/Economic Development Department Quarterly Report - October, 2013.
Recommendation
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The attached report provides an update on major projects currently worked on by staff of the Community
Services and Economic Development Departments.
Attachments
October, 2013 CS & ED Quarterly Report
Attachment 1 - Updated List of Grants Secured by the City of Edmonds
Inbox Reviewed By
City Clerk Sandy Chase
Mayor Dave Earling
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase
Form Started By: Stephen Clifton
Final Approval Date: 10/17/2013
Form Review
Date
10/17/2013 01:16 PM
10/17/2013 01:22 PM
10/17/2013 01:22 PM
Started On: 10/17/2013 11:40 AM
Packet Page 101 of 133
City of Edmonds
Community Services Department
Economic Development Department
Date: October 16, 2013
To: Mayor Earling and City Council members
From: Stephen Clifton, AICP
Community Services and Economic Development Director
Subject: Community Services and Economic Development
Quarterly Report — October, 2013
This report provides an update on major projects currently worked on by staff of the
Community Services and Economic Development Department.
Community Services
I. EDMONDS CROSSING
Project Description
Edmonds Crossing is a regional project intended to provide a long-term solution to current
operational and safety conflicts between ferry, rail, automobile, bus, and pedestrian traffic in
downtown Edmonds and along State Route 104. The Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) (including Washington State Ferries [WSF]), and City of Edmonds
propose to relocate the existing state ferry terminal from Main Street, in downtown
Edmonds, to Pt. Edwards, south of the downtown core. In the process, a multimodal center
would be established that would integrate ferry, rail, and transit services into a single
complex. A realigned SR 104 from its current intersection with Pine Street would provide
access. The new complex would provide an upgraded ferry terminal designed to meet the
operational requirements for accommodating forecast ferry ridership demand; a new rail
station designed to meet intercity passenger (Amtrak) and commuter rail (Sounder) service;
a transit center that would meet local bus system and regional transit system loading
requirements; facilities that allow both vehicular commuters and walk-on passengers to
utilize various transportation modes; parking, drop-off areas, retail/concessionaire space,
waiting areas; and a system linking these facilities to allow for the safe movement of users.
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• October, 2013 — As mentioned in the April, 2013 Quarterly Report, all Federal Funding
appropriated to the project has been deactivated or de -obligated by the Federal Transit
Packet Page 102 of 133
Administration and Federal Highway Administration due to inactivity of the project. De-
obligation/deactivation is a step used by FTA in order for federally appropriated funds to
be returned to the federal government.
II. SOUND TRANSIT (PHASE 1, AKA SOUND MOVE)
Project Description
During the past several years, Sound Transit has been implementing what is called the
Sound Move Plan. One element calls for commuter rail services, otherwise known as
Sounder. Commuter rail will eventually link Everett in the north with Seattle, Tacoma and
Lakewood in the South, a total of 82 miles through three counties. Sounder is being
implemented in three phases, one of which includes Everett to Seattle or the North
Commuter Rail corridor. Three commuter rail stations exist along this corridor, i.e., Everett,
Mukilteo and Edmonds.
Sound Transit Sounder currently operates 8 trains per day between Everett and Seattle, i.e.,
four round trips. This is a reduction of two round trips from the originally proposed
operational plan. The first roundtrip train run began in December, 2003.
Located between Main and Dayton Streets along both sides of the Burlington Northern Santa
Fe (BNSF) tracks and co -located with Amtrak's and Community Transit, Edmonds Commuter
Rail Station includes ADA accessible rail platforms, shelters, signage, lighting fixtures,
hanging flower baskets, ticket vending machines, on -site parking, and Community Transit
bus station.
Significant Activities since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — No new information at this time.
III. SOUND TRANSIT 2
Expanding the regional mass transit system
On Nov. 4, 2008, voters of the Central Puget Sound region approved a Sound Transit 2
ballot measure. The plan adds regional express bus and commuter rail service while building
36 additional miles of light rail to form a 55-mile regional system. For additional information,
visit http://soundtransit.org/. Sound Transit is preparing to extend light rail from Northgate
to Lynnwood, which voters approved as part of the Sound Transit 2 Plan in 2008 along with
funding to continue planning future service all the way to Everett. This project relies on
competing for and receiving significant federal funding. The Sound Transit Board took a
major step in year 2012 by confirming that light rail is the best mode of transit and
Interstate 5 is the right corridor to study based on ridership, travel times, service levels and
cost.
Significant Activities since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — Construction is currently underway on a
light rail extension to the University of Washington scheduled to open in 2016, followed
by service to Northgate targeted for opening in 2021. Voter -approved additions will
bring 36 new miles of service north, south and east of Seattle, creating more than 50
miles of regional light rail service.
Packet Page 103 of 133
IV. UNOCAL AKA CHEVRON SITE CLEANUP
Project Description
The UNOCAL property currently consists of a lower yard which currently contains petroleum
contamination resulting from more than 60 years of operation. Chevron, which acquired
UNOCAL, is now the entity responsible for cleaning up the site. Cleanup work at the lower
yard, which began in 2007, was a continuation of remediation work that has been ongoing
at the site since 2001. Chevron conducted cleanup work from summer 2007 through fall
2008 and has since been monitoring the site since.
Significant Activities since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — Interim actions have addressed most of the
contamination at the site. Chevron Environmental Management Company, on behalf of
Unocal, is performing a Feasibility Study to assess remedial alternatives to cleaning up
contamination that remains. Chevron EMC, Ecology, Washington State Ferries, and the
Edmonds Citizen's Awareness Committee continue to meet at key points during the
study to discuss the work. The draft Feasibility Study is due to Ecology at the end of
2013. Once the Study is finalized, Ecology will select cleanup actions to be taken at the
Site. The selected actions will be presented to the public in a draft Cleanup Action Plan.
V. EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT
Overview
The City Council, pursuant to state law, approved the formation of the Public Facilities
District (PFD) at its April 24, 2001 meeting. A PFD is a separate municipal corporation that
has authority to undertake the design, construction, operation, promotion and financing of a
Regional Center in the city. The Public Facilities District board consists of five members
originally appointed by the City Council on June 19, 2001. Phase 1A renovation of the
original Edmonds High School Auditorium into a first class Edmonds Center for the Arts
(ECA) and multipurpose facility was completed in September of 2006.
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• September and October, 2013 — The Edmonds Center for the Arts/Public Facilities District
Task Force have been meeting to discuss a proposal that could, subject to Council
approval, involve the preparation and negotiation of a grant agreement between the
City and the PFD. The grant agreement would provide funds to the PFD sufficient to
repay the City for all amounts that have been previously loaned to the PFD (or
requested for the remainder of 2013) under the Contingent Loan Agreement in support
of the debt issued by the PFD for the development of the Edmonds Center for the Arts.
An overview of the proposal will be prepared by the task force and will be provided to
the City Council and PFD Board.
Packet Page 104 of 133
VI. SNOHOMISH COUNTY PAINE FIELD
Overview
On October 14, 2004, a Mead & Hunt Inc. Business Travel Survey was issued which focused
on the market potential and options for Paine Field. On August 20, 2004, a Snohomish
County Citizen Cabinet issued an Economic Development Final Report -Blueprint for the
Economic Future of Snohomish County. Both reports put Paine Field in the regional spotlight
as they highlight the possibility of using Paine Field for commercial aircraft operations, thus
chancing its general aviation status.
Although many elected officials have said they do not support commercial air service at
Paine Field, federal law obligates the county to accommodate commercial service. Federal
law does not allow the county to prohibit or limit scheduled passenger air service. Instead, it
requires that the county negotiate with the airlines in good faith to accommodate their
proposed service.
Allegiant has said it plans to operate twice a week to Las Vegas, using 150-seat MD83 jet
aircraft. Horizon Airlines, via Alaska Airlines, has indicated that it will not serve Paine Field
unless another airlines begin service; this being said it wants to operate four times a day to
Portland and twice per day to Spokane, using 75-seat Bombardier Q400 turboprop airplanes
on both routes. Before airlines may begin commercial service, the FAA must amend the
county's operating certificate for Paine Field as well as the airlines' operating specifications.
The county was required to prepare an environmental assessment for Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) approval before those amendments can occur.
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — No new information at this time.
VII. RAILROAD QUIET ZONE
Overview
As discussed in the past, there is an expressed desire of the City Council and Port of
Edmonds to establish a full or partial quite zone along the City's shoreline. A quiet zone is a
section of rail line that contains one or more consecutive public crossings at which
locomotive horns are not routinely sounded.
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — No new information at this time.
Economic Development
I. PARTNERSHIPS
Goal 1, Policy is of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan is to promote a results -
oriented permit and licensing process, which consolidates review timelines, eliminates
unnecessary steps, and maintains a strong customer service approach.
Packet Page 105 of 133
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — The Public Works Director, Acting
Development Services Director, Building Official, and other staff have been meeting
with me to discuss potential changes in operations to improve development review
efficiencies. This includes moving towards re -structuring the City's development
code.
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — At the Mayor's request, City staff has
compiled information on all City fee structures.
Goal 1 of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states "foster a healthy business
community that provides employment and other economic opportunities."
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — Economic Development staff continue
recruiting businesses to, and helping businesses expand or relocate within, the City of
Edmonds.
Economic Development Commission Overview
On June 2, 2009 — The City Council approved Ordinance 3735 which creates a new
Citizens Economic Development Commission (EDC) in order to determine new strategies
for economic development within the City and identify new sources of revenues. In
conjunction with the Planning Board, the new commission is to review and consider
strategies designed to improve commercial viability, tourism development, and activity.
The ED Commission consists of 17 members appointed by the Mayor and the City Council.
The commission is staffed by the City's Economic Development Director and Executive
Assistant. Frances Chapin and Rob Chave also attend regularly. The Commission is to
make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council, as well as to other City boards or
commissions as appropriate, regarding economic development strategies. Minutes from
monthly meetings (once approved by the Edmonds EDC) can be found at
http://www.ci.edmonds.wa.us/EconDevMinutes.stm.
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July 17, 2013 — The Edmonds Economic Development Commission conducted a
meeting in the Brackett Meeting Room. Agenda items included updates on Highway
99 Task Force, Arts Summit, Highway 99 Enhancements, limiting certain office uses
on the 1st 45 feet of the ground floor within the BD1 zone), Communications and
Community Outreach, Technology, Tourism, Land Use (incentive zoning, train
mitigation and limiting certain office uses on the 1st 45 feet of the ground floor
within the BD1 zone) and Strategic Plan.
• September 18, 2013 - The Edmonds Economic Development Commission conducted a
meeting in the Brackett Meeting Room. Agenda items included introductions of new
student representative and two new ED commissioners, presentation by David Jaffe
on development plans for Swedish Edmonds, and updates on Communications and
Community Outreach, Technology, Tourism, Land Use (incentive zoning, limiting
Packet Page 106 of 133
certain office uses on the 1st 45 feet of the ground floor within the BD1 zone), and
Strategic Plan.
Goal 1, Policy 1f of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: "Continue to
partner with business and economic development organizations, and address feedback from
the business community."
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — I continue attending monthly Edmonds
Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee meetings, Downtown
Edmonds Merchants Association (DEMA) meetings, and Downtown Edmonds
Business Improvement District (BID) Board meetings in order to collaboratively
share information about City/Chamber/DEMA/BID issues/projects/programs, etc.
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — I continue to attend Economic Alliance
of Snohomish County Resources and Industry committee meetings.
II. BUSINESS EXPANSION, RETENTION, AND DIVERSIFICATION OF TAX
BASE
Goal 1, Policy is of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: "Encourage and
expand business expansion and retention programs. Goal 3 calls for diversifying the tax
base and increasing revenues to support local services."
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — I continue working with property and
business owners in attempts to help find leasable space in addition to discussing
potential leasing and redevelopment of buildings and land.
Goal 1, Policy 1f of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: "Continue to
partner with business and economic development organizations, and address feedback from
the business community."
Goal 2, Policy 2i of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: "Create synergy for
commercial businesses where possible, for example, by implementing a 'retail core" area in
the downtown."
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
Amendments to Downtown BD Zones - The Planning Board discussed four potential
amendments to the downtown BD zones during meetings on March 9, March 23, April 13,
April 27, and June 8, 2011. During the June 8, 2011 Planning Board meeting, the Board
voted 7-0 (with amendments) to forward a recommendation to approve the proposed
amendments to the City Council.
Limiting Office Uses along the ground floor of designated commercial street frontages
Packet Page 107 of 133
One of the amendments to the BD1 zone includes limiting office only uses in ground
floor storefronts of designated street frontages within the BD1 zone. I prepared a
chronology of events related to the proposal which was attached to a September 11,
2013 Planning Board workshop agenda packet and an October 9, 2013 Planning
Board Public Hearing agenda packet (see summaries below).
September 4, 2013 - Owners of property located within the BD1 Zone were invited to a
second meeting in the City Hall Brackett Meeting Room. Similar to the meeting
which took place on May 13, 2013, I provided an overview of the proposal and
talked about why the proposal is being considered by the City. Mr. Brooks did not
attend this meeting so Mr. Clifton highlighted Mr. Brooks' 20 Ingredients for an
Outstanding Downtown and how several relate to subject proposal. He referenced
Mr. Brooks' comments about clustering and power in critical mass. Property owners
were also provided the issue paper prepared by the Economic Development
Commission Land Use Subcommittee which included a proposed draft amended
Table referenced as Table 16.43-1 within the Edmonds Community Development
Code.
As requested by property owners on May 13, 2013, a spreadsheet listing businesses
located along the ground floor street frontages within the BD 1 Zone was also
provided.
Property owners were given an opportunity to ask questions. No statements
opposed to the proposal were made and general support was expressed by those
attending the meeting.
September 11, 2013 - The Planning Board conducted a workshop on the most recent
proposal. During the meeting, the Planning Board asked about inserting clarifying
language into the proposed revised Edmonds Community Development Code Section
16.43.020 in addition to adding footnotes; discussed window displays; and raised an
issue about applying a 90-day non-conformance timeline versus the City's current
non-conformance timeline of 6 months, etc.
October 9, 2013 - The Planning Board conducted a public hearing workshop on the
most recent proposal. The Planning Board voted unanimously to support the
proposal as amended and forward a recommendation to the City Council.
III. IMPROVING BUSINESS CLIMATE
Goal 2, Policy 2e of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: 'explore options
such as Business Improvement Districts/Areas (special assessment districts) as a way to help
shopping areas fund marketing and beautification in a sustainable fashion."
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — The Edmonds Downtown Business
Improvement District (EDBID) Interim Members Advisory Board conduct meetings
nearly every two weeks at HDR Engineering on Second Avenue South.
Packet Page 108 of 133
• August 27, 2013 — The City Council approved Ordinance 3941 amending Edmonds City
Code Section 3.75.120 to extend the submission date of a budget and work program
for year 2014 to the City by October 31, 2013, and October 1 of each year thereafter.
Goal 2, Policy 2h of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: "Work to identify
and "brand" distinct business districts, where there is a natural synergy, such as the
Highway 99 International District, the Stevens Hospital Medical Corridor, and the 41" Avenue
Arts Corridor."
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• Phase 1 of the Highway 99 Enhancement Project is substantially complete; the City is
waiting for replacement parts needed for installing banners. The goal is to create a
visual gateway and identity for the Edmonds International District while enhancing
the pedestrian experience and safety.
Goal 2, Policy 2j of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: 'Provide a quality
environment with character for patrons and residents to enjoy."
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — I have been talking to downtown
business owners since early 2012 about my "Paint The Town" initiative, encouraging
them to paint the facades of their buildings. It seems to have taken off this year and
several more building facades have been painted. Examples include: Reliable
Flooring, Aria, Arista Wine Cellars, C'est la Vie, Claire's, Kinder Britches, Office
building on the SW corner of 6t" and Main, etc.
IV. TECHNOLOGY
Goal 3, Policy 3b of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: "Leverage
technology assets, such as existing fiber connections, to pursue new revenue streams."
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — City staff have been meeting with the
School District and other interested parties to explore various ways to effectively
utilize the City's fiber backbone.
V. TOURISM
Goal 3, Policy 3g of the Edmonds Economic Development Plan states: "Expand tourism
efforts to take advantage of regional trends, such as nature tourism."
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — I continue to serve on the Snohomish
County Tourism Promotion Board and attend board meetings.
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — Destination Marketing continues to film
events that take place throughout the year as well as scenic shots. The purpose is to
Packet Page 109 of 133
use footage to create a 3 minute video that can be posted to the City's website. We
have also discussed using the film footage to also create a 1 minute video for the
purposes of Economic Development.
Items of Interest
■ Burlington Northern Santa Fe — Installation of Second Rail Line
As a part of the Sound Transit's Sound Move, Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF)
proposes to install a second rail line alongside the existing rail line between the areas
north of Downtown Edmonds and south of Marina Beach Park. BNSF has not provided a
commencement date.
Significant Activities Since July, 2013
• July, August, September and October, 2013 — No new information.
■ Grants
Over the past few years, City of Edmonds staff have been quite successful in
securing both state and federal grants to help fund a variety of projects
throughout the City. Attachment 1 includes an updated list of grants.
Packet Page 110 of 133
Grants Secured by City of Edmonds, WA
1. Historic Preservation - Preserve America Grant in the amount of $24,000 for a matching grant to implement
artist made interpretive signage to identify sites of historic interest downtown, and another $7,500 State
Certified Local Government Grant for a city-wide historic sites survey.
2. 228th and HWY 99 (228th St. SW Corridor Improvements) - $536,000 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Surface Transportation Program Grant for design and right of way acquisition to improve access and safety at
the intersection. $4,233,000 FHWA Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant for additional design and
ROW acquisition costs, as well as complete construction.
3. Main Street - $725,000 FHWA Enhancements Grant and $500,000 State appropriation for design and
reconstruction of Main Street (between 5th and 6th Streets).
4. Five Corners — $2,399,000 FHWA Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Grant for design of a roundabout,
Right of Way acquisition, and construction.
5. Highway 99 (Phase 1 and 2) - $289,000 FHWA Enhancements Grant for International District Illumination
Enhancements along Hwy. 99 from 230th St. SW to 220th St. SW (This is an additional allocation to the original
$373,000 grant for a total of $662,000).
6. Highway 99 (Phase 3) - $685,000 FHWA Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant for lighting
improvements along Hwy. 99 from 220th St. SW to 212th St. SW.
7. 5th Ave. South Overlay— $551,000 FHWA Preservation Grant for design and construction of an overlay 5th Ave.
S from Elm Way to Walnut St., as well as upgrades to all non-ADA compliant curb ramps along stretch.
8. 76th Ave W/212th Street — $940,397 CMAQ grant for design and right of way acquisition to improve the
intersection and reduce congestion.
9. Shell Valley — $100,000 Department of Ecology Stormwater Grant and $250,000 Washington State appropriation
for Shell Valley Emergency Access Road.
10. Stormwater Improvements - $128,115 Department of Ecology Stormwater Grant for programmatic stormwater
improvements and a $259,000 Ecology Stormwater Grant for a new decant facility at the Public Works shops
complex.
11. 84th Avenue - Washington Traffic Safety Commission Grant in the amount of $6,250 for installation of a radar
reader board which depicts the speed of cars.
12. 226th Street Walkway - $185,000 FHWA Safety Grant for design and construction of 300 feet of new sidewalk
and ADA curb ramps.
13. Interurban Trail - $577,000 Washington State Wildlife and Recreation Coalition Grant and $750,000 CMAQ
Grant to construct the final segment of the Interurban Trail.
14. City Park Enhancement - $500,000 Recreation Conservation Office Grant to construct improvements to City Park
Updated September, 2013 Page 1
Packet Page 111 of 133
15. Efficiency Conservation - $160,000 Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant to purchase equipment and
implement programs that conserve energy.
16. Citywide Safety Improvements - $300,000 FHWA Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Grant for
upgrades to several traffic signal cabinets and pedestrian countdown display.
17. Commute Trip Reduction program - $2,630 Community Transit grant for an incentives program to City
employees using alternative modes of transportation to driving alone as their commute to work.
October, 2012 — January, 2013
18. Walkway on 15th St. SW from SR-104 to 8th Ave. S — $374,000 (100% grant funded w/ no local match for
design and construction) for an addition of approximately 600 feet of sidewalk on the south side of 15th St. SW,
with upgrades to all existing non -compliant ADA curb ramps within the project limits, addition of stormwater
drainage facilities, and sharrows on both sides of the street (from the eastern end of the project limits to
Sherwood Elementary). The grant also assists funding for an already education program that promotes bicycle
riding safety through an in -school and on -bike curriculum.
19. Walkway on 238th St. SW from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. $591,000 Safe Routes to School Grant (100% grant
funded w/ no local match for design and construction) for the addition of approximately 1,200 feet of sidewalk
on one side of the 238th St. SW, with ADA compliant curb ramps, addition of stormwater drainage facilities, and
sharrows on both sides of the street along the project limits. The grant also assists funding for an already
existing education program that promotes bicycle riding safety through an in -school and on -bike curriculum.
20. Sunset Ave. Walkway from Edmonds St. to Caspers St. $159,000 Safe Routes to School Grant (design only) to
construct 2,000 feet of waterfront trail on the west side of Sunset Avenue from Bell St. to Caspers. St. Curb bulb -
outs at pedestrian crossings, new curb, stormwater facilities, benches, trash receptacles, signage, a mid -block
crossing, and curb ramp upgrades will also be included in this project. Note: for this project, the City is currently
resolving Lease / ROW issues with BNSF, in order to comply with all Federal requirements since a Federal grant
was secured.
21. ADA curb ramp upgrades along 3rd Ave. S from Main St. to Pine St. $50,000 CMAQ aka Congestion Mitigation
and Air Quality Program Grant (construction) for upgrading all non -compliant ADA curb ramps along this
stretch.
22. ESCO project - $187,500 State Commerce grant for (March 13, 2013).
23. Hazel Miller Plaza Concert Series - $9,200 grant from the Hazel Miller Foundation for 2013.
January — April, 2013
24. Madrona Elementary Walkway (236th St. SW from SR-104 to Madrona Elementary) - $494,000 grant from
Washington State via the Safe Routes to School Program. This project will construct approximately 600 feet of
curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the south side of 236th St. SW connecting Madrona Elementary School to
Edmonds Way / SR-104, with ADA curb ramps on all street corners within the project limits, addition of
stormwater drainage facilities, and bicycle sharrows on both sides of the street. The project will also consist in
an education program, where kids attending Madrona Elementary will be taught different bicycle riding safety
Updated September, 2013 Page 2
Packet Page 112 of 133
tips, with in -class education and bicycle rodeos. The design phase is scheduled to begin in the Summer of 2013
and the construction is planned for Summer'14.
May - July, 2013
25. City Park Enhancement - Play and Spray Revitalization (These grants tie to Number 14 above)
a. Snohomish County - $80,000 Sell of bonds to help local government projects.
b. Hazel Miller Foundation - $270,000 to assist with funding for City Park play and spray area. The Spray
Pad will be named after Hazel Miller.
26. Perrinville Flow Reduction Study - $188,772 grant from the Department of Ecology.
27. Conservation Futures — Beach Acquisition: $500,000 from a Snohomish County Conservation Futures Grant to
help acquire beach property as part of a $900,000 project to acquire, demolish, and rehabilitate back to
pervious landscaping.
28. Historic Edmonds Calendar - $6,000 grant from Certified Local Government for a new (2014) Historic Edmonds
Calendar.
29. Rooftop Solar Project — $34,000 from the Washington Department of Commerce (our share of a US Department
of Energy grant project led by Commerce) for a "Rooftop Solar Challenge"
30. Stormwater operation and administration improvements - $50,000 from the Department of Ecology for
programmatic Stormwater operation and administration improvements.
31. LID Retrofit Project - $170,000 from the Department of Ecology for planning and predesign on a LID retrofit
project.
32. Edmonds Arts Summit - $1,500 from Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation.
33. Edmonds Arts Summit - $1,500 from Hubbard Foundation.
34. Edmonds Arts Summit - $2,000 from Hazel Miller Foundation.
35. School Zone Flashing Beacons — $37,500 grant from the Washington Traffic Safety Commission for the addition
of flashing beacons at (5) school zones.
Updated September, 2013 Page 3
Packet Page 113 of 133
AM-6245
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time: 5 Minutes
Submitted By: Carrie Hite
Department: Parks and Recreation
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type: Information
Information
Subiect Title
Presentation: Snohomish County Grants $80,000 to Edmonds for City Park Project.
Recommendation
71,
Mayor and Council receive a check from Snohomish County for $80,000 to support the City Park Spray
and Play revitalization.
Previous Council Action
None.
Narrative
This will be a special presentation by Snohomish County.
Inbox Reviewed By
City Clerk Sandy Chase
Mayor Dave Earling
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase
Fonn Started By: Carrie Hite
Final Approval Date: 10/18/2013
Form Review
Date
10/18/2013 08:41 AM
10/18/2013 08:48 AM
10/18/2013 09:17 AM
Started On: 10/17/2013 05:40 PM
Packet Page 114 of 133
AM-6227
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time:
Submitted For:
Department:
Review Committee:
5 Minutes
Dave Earling
Mayor's Office
Type: Information
Tnformation
Submitted By:
Committee Action:
Subject Title
Mayor's presentation to Police Chief Al Compaan on his 35th Anniversary with the City.
Recommendation
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Carolyn
LaFave
In 1978 Police Chief Al Compaan was hired by the City of Edmonds as a Patrolman Third Class. Thus
began his career with the City of Edmonds Police Department. Over the years Chief Compaan has also
served as a Senior Patrolman, Sergeant, Detective, DARE Officer, Assistant Chief, and his current
position, Chief of Police.
Chief Compaan holds a BA in Sociology/Society and Justice. In 2004 he completed Northwest University
School of Police Staff and Command and in 2006 he received his Executive Management Certification
from Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission. Under his guidance, the Edmonds Police
Department received accreditation by the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs in 2009
and 2013.
2013 marks the 35th anniversary of Chief Compaan's induction into the Edmonds Police Department.
Chief Compaan is the only Police Officer in the Edmonds' PD history to achieve this milestone. In honor
of this, and his many other accomplishments, Mayor Earling would like to make a special presentation.
Inbox
City Clerk
Mayor
Finalize for Agenda
Fonn Started By: Carolyn LaFave
Final Approval Date: 10/16/2013
Reviewed By
Sandy Chase
Dave Earling
Sandy Chase
Form Review
Date
10/16/2013 12:04 PM
10/16/2013 03:41 PM
10/16/2013 04:11 PM
Started On: 10/11/2013 08:25 AM
Packet Page 115 of 133
AM-6139
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time:
Submitted For:
Department:
Review Committee:
5 Minutes
Dave Earling
Mayor's Office
Type: Information
"information
Subject Title
National Arts & Humanities Month Proclamation
Recommendation
Previous Council Action
Narrative
Submitted By:
Committee Action:
Carolyn
LaFave
This proclamation commemorates the efforts of millions of people in our country, including the many arts
organization and individuals in Edmonds, who work to make the arts and humanities a part of everyone's
life while contributing to our economic vitality and enhancing education for our youth.
Edmonds is known as a community that supports the arts and many talented cultural organizations call
Edmonds their home, including; Cascade Symphony, Driftwood Theater, Edmonds Arts Festival and Arts
Festival Foundation, Edmonds Center for the Arts, Edmonds Historical Museum, Gallery North and the
Olympic Ballet theatre. In addition the city is home to a rich variety of arts related businesses. The City
of Edmonds Arts Commission works on behalf of the City to foster the literary, performing and visual
arts with such programs as the nationally recognized Write on the Sound writers' conference in October,
free Summer Concerts in the park, a significant collection of public art, and ongoing exhibits by regional
artists. Partnerships, sponsorships, and volunteers are key to the success of Edmonds Arts Commission
programs.
This proclamation is an opportunity to urge citizens to reflect on the benefits of the arts to Edmonds and
the many opportunities to experience a broad array of cultural events throughout October and all year
long.
national arts humanities
Inbox
City Clerk
Mayor
Finalize for Agenda
Attachments
Form Review
Reviewed By Date
Scott Passey 10/14/2013 11:20 AM
Dave Earling 10/16/2013 03:42 PM
Sandy Chase 10/16/2013 04:11 PM
Packet Page 116 of 133
Form Started By: Carolyn LaFave Started On: 09/20/2013 09:57 AM
Final Approval Date: 10/16/2013
Packet Page 117 of 133
City of Edmonds • Office of the Mayor
t�j National Arts &
'TA( Humanities Month
NA-IONAL arts humanities
MONTH
October z o 13
WHEREAS, the month of October has been recognized as National Arts and Humanities Month at
the local, state, and federal level for more than two decades; and
WH EREAS, the arts and humanities are vital components of our children's education and our
national growth — not only teaching our youth to observe closely, interpret creatively,
and think critically, but also bringing new cultural experiences to our communities and
helping drive economic progress; and
WHEREAS, the nonprofit arts industry strengthens our local and national economy, by generating
$135 billion in total economic activity annually and supporting the full-time equivalent of
4•13 million jobs nationwide; and
WHEREAS, Edmonds is home to over 3o not -for -profit cultural organizations and over zoo arts
related businesses, and thousands of visitors come to Edmonds each year for arts and
culture events; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds supports the arts through the Edmonds Arts Commission and its
vital partnerships with local arts and culture organizations, businesses, and educational
institutions, and recognizes the many other contributions of visual, performing, and
literary arts in our community;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that I, David O. Earling, Mayor, do hereby proclaim October as
National Arts and Humanities Month in Edmonds Washington and recognize the impressive
participation of our citizens and visitors in the many cultural resources and opportunities in Edmonds.
David O. Earling, Mayor
October zz, 2013
Packet Page 118 of 133 -
AM-6235
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time: 15 Minutes
Submitted By: Sandy Chase
Department: City Clerk's Office
Review Committee:
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Annual Report - Public Defender
Recommendation
Information only.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Committee Action:
J,
Narrative
James Feldman, Public Defender for the City of Edmonds, will present his annual report to the City
Council.
Mr. Feldman submitted the attached letter for the Mayor and City Council.
James Feldman Letter / Information
Inbox
Mayor
Finalize for Agenda
Form Started By: Sandy Chase
Final Approval Date: 10/17/2013
Reviewed By
Dave Earling
Sandy Chase
A ffarhman+e
Form Review
Date
10/17/2013 11:20 AM
10/17/2013 11:23 AM
Started On: 10/17/2013 10:54 AM
Packet Page 119 of 133
James A. Feldman . David W. Lee Brandon M. Feldman!
Katherine ivl. ChrostowsLa Patrick J. Feldman Nicholas P. Martin • Tuan A. Phan
1
A T T O R N ! Y i A T ! A W
October 8, 2013
City of Edmonds
121 5th Ave. N
Edmonds, WA 98020
RECEIvED
OCT 15 2013
EDMONDS CITY CLERK
Re: City of Edmonds Public Defender/Annual Report to the City Counsel
Dear Mrs. Chase:
I would request and appreciate that you distribute to the Mayor and all Council members, the
following letter and information prior to my report on October 22, 2013.
FELDMAN & LEE, P.S.
Best Regards,
1 "1 i6zftwon"
Jame . Feldman
Attorney at Law
JAF/kd
19303 44t1! Avenue W. • Lynnwood, WA 98036 - (425) 771-3600 • Fax: (425) 775-8016
604 West A,[eeker Street, Suite 206 • Kent, WA 98032 • (253) 859-2188 • Fax: (253) 859-2295
Packet Page 120 of 133 www.feldmanlee.com
fa nes A. Feldman • David W. Lee Brandon NL Feldman
Katherine T 1. `'hrostowska Patrick J. Feldman Nicholas P. Martin • Tuan A. Phan
A T f K iA t Y 5 . A T 1 A W
October 10, 2013
City of Edmonds
121 5th Ave. N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Mayor David Earling
City Council members:
Kristiana Johnson
Storm Peterson
Adrienne Fraley-Monillas
Diane Buckshnis
Joan Bloom
Frank Yamamoto
Lora Petso
Re: City of Edmonds Public Defender/Annual Report to the City Council
Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council persons:
In anticipation of my annual report on October 22, 2013,1 am enclosing herein a recent letter
sent to City Attorney Jeff Taraday, regarding our request for reopening of the public defender
contract pursuant to the contract provision in place.
Although Feldman and Lee feels that we have provided representation which has exceeded the
required standards imposed by the Washington State Supreme court, we are concerned that an
argument can be made by other entities or individuals that case loads are so high and the
compensation is so low, that effective representation is impossible. Similar arguments were made
in the Federal Law Suit against the cities of Mt. Vernon and Burlington.
As of September 30, 2013 we have been appointed to 500 cases and have appeared at twice
weekly jail in custody hearings, where we resolve cases on behalf of individual defendants and
as attorney of the day and therefore those cases are not counted by the city as an assigned case.
The city has paid $73,405 through September 30, 2013. Thus, an average monthly payment of
approximately $8,000 per month.
19303 44th Avenue W. • Lynnwood, DNA 93036 . (425) 771-3600 • Fax: (425) 775-8016
604 West IVIM<ef Street, Suite 206 , Ke.it, WA 98032 • (253) 859-2488 • Fax: (253) 859-2295
Packet Page 121 of 133 www.feldmanlee.com
James A. Feldman . David W. Lee Brandon N1. Feldman
Katherine id1. Chrostowslca • Patrick J. Feldman Nicholas P. Martin • Tuan A. Phan
It
' Q.
A T T U R N f Y S A L L A %V
In our report to the city in 2012, we indicated that considering all the factors required with the
state standards for providing public defender services that for each 400 un-weighted cases
assigned to an attorney, a reasonable cost per attorney would be $11,500 per month. As you can
see the amount paid so far is significantly less then that amount.
Commencing in 2013 we requested the city to reopen negotiations regarding compensation for
services provided and have had one meeting with the Attorney Taraday, who initially reported
that it was the cities opinion that the contract should not be reopened late 2014, in anticipation of
it's termination as of January 1, 2015. Feldman and Lee feel that we can not continue to offer our
services and meet the requirements of the public defender standards at the current contract rate
which was based on a per case bases of an amount of $130 per case; which has not been changed
since 1985.
We believe that not only is Feldman and Lee at risk of discipline by the State Supreme Court or
the State Bar Association should a decision be made that there is inadequate representation being
provided, but the city of Edmonds could face the same risk of third party monitoring of it's court
system, as well as damages from individual defendants as currently being faced by the cities of
Mt. Vernon and Burlington in the federal law suit.
For all the above reasons we are seeking a renegotiation of the contract to take affect in January
1, 2014.
I look forward to any questions you may have at the city council meeting.
FELDMAN & LEE, P.S.
Best Regards,
r
�wwrr
Jam . Feldman
Attorney at Law
JAF/kd
19303 44th Avenue W. • Lynnvvoocl, WA 98036 • (42.5) 771-3600 • Fax: (425) 775-8016
604 West lN,leelcer Street, Suite 206 . Kcnt, WA 98032 = (253) 859-2488 - Fax: (253) 859-2295
Packet Page 122 of 133 www.feldmanlee.com
James A. Feldman • David W. Lee Brandon M. Feldman
Katherine TIA. Chrostowska • Patrick J. Feldman Nicholas P. Martin • Tuan A. Phan
�.
A T T 0 R N F Y" S A T I A \\
September 12, 2013
Jeff Taraday
Edmonds city Attorney
Edmonds City hall
121 5th Ave. N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: Public Defender's Contract
Dear Mr. Taraday,
As you are aware this office has requested that the City of Edmonds enter into a
renegotiation of the existing public defender contract now set to expire on December 31, 2014.
The following is a summary of our position regarding adjustment to the contract and the basis for
it.
19303 44th Avenue W. • Lynnwood, WA 93036 • (425) 771-3600 • Fax: (425) 775-8016
604 VVest i%deeicer St,eet, Suite 206 • Kent, WA 98032 • (253) 839-2-488 • Fax: (253) 859-2295
Packet Page 123 of 133 www.feldmanlee.com
Contractual Justification
The current contract for the public defender services between the City of Edmonds and Feldman
and Lee commenced January 01, 2011 and concludes on December 31, 2014.
Section four; paragraph D has the following language:
The Parties understand and acknowledge that the Washington State
Supreme Court is in the process of adoption of amendments to CR3.1, CRLJ3.1,
as well as standards, elements and certifications which can significantly impact
the provision of the services of this agreement. Parties agreed to reopen the
provisions to this agreement and renegotiate the terms in order to properly comply
with such rule changes, standards or certification requirements.
Packet Page 124 of 133
Standards and Certification Requirements
The Supreme Court on June 15, 2012 published proposed standards for indigent defense. In the
preamble to these standards, the Washington State Supreme court adopted guidelines to insure
that indigent defendants receive adequate representation from their court appointed counsel. The
court identified several issues that affect the quality of indigent defense and these guidelines are
intended to address these issues.
The court went on to state that the Washington Defenders Association (WDA) has established
standards for adequate representation and although the standards were not adopted in total the
court felt that they could be used to improve the effectiveness of indigent defense. Starting in
2012 the court adopted the following standards which affect the representation of indigent
defendants in the Edmonds Municipal court:
Standard 3.2: The case load of Public Defense Attorneys shall allow
each attorney to give each client the time and effort necessary to
ensure effective representation. Neither the Defender Organizations, county
officer, contract attorneys, nor assigned Counsel shall accept work loads
that, by reason of their excessive size, interferes with the rendering of
quality representation.
One important issue is that involving case load limits. The concept is there is to be a maximum
number of cases full time public defenders may handle. These limits also impact the support
services Attorneys must have as well. Contracts for Public Defenders services should provide for
or should include administrative costs associated with providing legal representation. These costs
should include but are not limited to travel; telephone; legal library, financial accounting; client
management systems; computer and software; office space and supplies; training; meeting the
reporting requirements imposed by these standards; and other costs not necessarily incurred in
the day to day management of the contract. (See Standard 6.1)
The Supreme Court initially slated implementation of standard 3.4 which set misdemeanor case
loads at either 300 cases per year in a weighted system or 400 cases per year in an un-weighted
system for September 2013. However, the court has twice postponed that effective date and it is
now set for January 01, 2015.
Packet Page 125 of 133
Judicial Justification
The ACLU on behalf of public defender clients in the cities of Mt.Vernon and Burlington filed a
lawsuit: Wilbur v. City of Mt. Vernon and Burlington No. C11-1100RSL, in the U.S. District
Court Western District of Washington at Seattle alleging that the public defender system in those
cities systematically deprived indigent defendants of their constitutional right to assistance of
counsel. (See attached). In its complaint, the plaintiffs asked for the following:
1. The determination that the action that the cities in the instructions of and the Public
Defenders duties by their contract vendee violated defendants rights to assistance of counsel
pursuant to the Sixth and Fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution and that they
be certified as a class to bring an action for relief.
2. For the issuance of preliminary and permanent junctions restraining the cities from
violating the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution in the way that
they provide indigent defense services.
3. For preliminary and permanent junctions enjoining the cities from making
expenditures of funds on indigent defense services likely to result in Constitutional violations.
4. For attorneys fees and court costs in this matter. This case went to trial in front of
Judge Robert Lasnik in July 2013. A decision is expected in the fall 2013.
In its complaint the ACLU alleged that: defendants, under the direction of their respected
Mayors and City Council have breached their Constitutional duty by operating a Public Defense
system that regularly and systematically deprives indigent persons of the right to assistance of
counsel. Among other things, the defendants failed to impose reasonable caseload limits on the
Public Defender, and failed to provide adequate public defense services and thereby have
constructively denied indigent defendants of their right to counsel that is guaranteed under the
U.S. Constitution and by the United Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. Wainwright.
372 U.S. 335, 835 S. Ct 792, 9L E.d. 799 (1963)
Packet Page 126 of 133
Analysis
Although Feldman and Lee believe that we zealously and adequately provide Public Defense
services on the behalf of our clients for the City of Edmonds, we are concerned that with the
newly adopted standards and the pending caseload limits our present arrangement may not be
sufficient, and could expose both Feldman and Lee and the City of Edmonds to civil liability for
this failure.
We noted in our October 2012 report to the court, that based on the current caseload, the
presumed number of Attorneys necessary to comply with the above guidelines would be two and
a half to three attorneys. It is likely that the Supreme Court in postponing implementation of the
caseload standards until 2015 has signaled that it intends to adopt some form of these strict
numerical standards. We believe that it is unlikely that our present staffing for Edmonds
Municipal Court (currently an attorney and a half) is sufficient to comply with the current and
anticipated guidelines.
Further the new standards require staffing, monitoring and private investigation services. We do
not feel that the $125.00 per case fee negotiated in 1987 will be adequate to address our current
staffing needs.
FELDMAN & LEE, P.S.
Best Regards,
Jain . Feldman
Attorney at Law
JAF/kd
Packet Page 127 of 133
AM-6236
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time: 15 Minutes
Submitted By: Sandy Chase
Department: City Clerk's Office
Review Committee:
Type: Information
Information
Subject Title
Annual Report - City Attorney
Recommendation
Information only.
Previous Council Action
N/A
Committee Action:
Narrative
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney, will present his annual report to the City Council.
Inbox
Mayor
Finalize for Agenda
Form Started By: Sandy Chase
Final Approval Date: 10/17/2013
Form Review
Reviewed By Date
Dave Earling 10/17/2013 11:23 AM
Sandy Chase 10/17/2013 01:16 PM
Started On: 10/17/2013 11:18 AM
10.
Packet Page 128 of 133
AM-6233
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time: 10 Minutes
Submitted For: Council President Petso Submitted By:
Department: City Council
Review Committee: Committee Action:
Type: Action
Information
Subject Title
Appointment of Candidates to Edmonds Citizens' Tree Board
Recommendation
11.
Jana Spellman
Previous Council Action
October 15, 2013 Council Meeting: Council interviewed 2 candidates, Rene Travis and Barbara
Brooke Harrell, for possible appointment to Tree Board.
Narrative
This item has been put on the agenda for approval of appointment to Tree Board.
Travis App
Harrell App
Inbox Reviewed By
City Clerk Sandy Chase
Mayor Dave Earling
Finalize for Agenda Sandy Chase
Form Started By: Jana Spellman
Final Approval Date: 10/17/2013
Attachments
Form Review
Date
10/16/2013 04:11 PM
10/16/2013 04:58 PM
10/17/2013 11:23 AM
Started On: 10/16/2013 01:29 PM
Packet Page 129 of 133
Edmonds
Citizen Board and Commission Application
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
• • 11c. l Ry.,
Tree Board- Ap1n Izcatzon ----
PLEASE NOTE:
THE TREE BOARD MEETS ON THE 1ST THURSDAY OF THE MONTH at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall.
Please see City Code regarding Citizen's Tree Board foil wing this page.
/-
Name: .i�,Y►-� ��L� �; r S Date: �J
Length of residency in Edmonds:
(Must reside within the City limits.
Organizational affiliations:
Why are you Seeking this appointrpent?
What skills and knowledge do you have to meet the selection criteria? , /WA
You may return your completed form as follows:
E-mail to: jana.spellman@edmondswa.gov
Fax: 425.771.0254
U.S. Mail: Edmonds City Council Office
121 51h Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Drop off at 1st floor receptionist at City Hall
(121 5th Avenue North)
Of Importance to Note
As an applicant for appointment to a public office, board or
commission, the information provided on this application, along
with any additional information submitted, is considered a public
record that may be subject to disclosure in accordance with
Washington State public disclosure laws and may be posted on
the City's web site.
APPLICATIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED
UNTIL POSITIONS ARE FILLED.
Packet Page 130 of 133
City of Edmonds
�Fb
y��Ca
Citizen Board and Commission Application3
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE)
2 J ins, t K;�rl
(Board or Commission)
Name: 1`)�f�� mac. �f O o�t �C-Y-C e Date:
Occupational status and background: 4-,
L i� �� ,� l t -�-`i u � � ✓td€ � i �� �h c � O r dv, rc
Organizational affiliations:
W 4— VI tt
✓tip C'urCre- (',l M " C , �
4[ S�-"'7d i-, Snc h --05L-
tin i Cl+i, iN s-Lq f it
Pa-(-- s C" ,'-YC+
Why are you seeking this appointment? J- �a V-e �; r td ,.r Z,4h.,vr.7 c�S S' ✓t �' e S c"e—
tl-��t.� L.iFS�tU � ��iri l� t7+G�' � �,-C-r n2v�t _�n{/ofrep/1__C�V�C��(�I (�'U�-✓(,, `C�I�=�'ti"
Cf:/ J �d '/ e C e
� 1
%r?J�i rC i'n Mom] PdLv'JAu✓iF� 1 �r �trcf r,i<-e 'f`� i�� �, ice.r4 rt� 5C~l7� c,rf./14
What skills and knowledge do you have to meet the selection criteria?_1
r&z4,1 � ��CCT �S-r" r�G� I✓I'(53 ��� Tf� vlfa�s N6 I-r U F-A Ad" J-� `&4�
t rIt!
0, Vi U i �! e z ; z- C �' y` fi . e d o(e ) . -e-CS t i /Z�' S`l�c r^r �r i, o / { « !`h r� Ci ✓�
Additional Comments: �� ^¢SC��� ��� fn� ' `� 041
i jS ��CJ // Lam,) Lr i -el� 1 v,c %..
&J r.n G /:J<C' -7 C;i S-�e �1
C-71
Please return this completed form to:
Edmonds City Hall Signature
1215=h Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
carolyn.lafave@edmondswa.gov "
Fax:425.771.0252 DEC 2 2012
Packet Page 131 of 133
AM-6243
City Council Meeting
Meeting Date: 10/22/2013
Time: 2 Hours
Submitted For: Roger Neumaier
Department: Finance
Committee:
Submitted By: Roger Neumaier
Type: Information
Information
Subiect Title
Budget Work Session - Department presentations and public comment
12.
Recommendation
Previous Council Action
Narrative
The schedule for budget review and adoption by the Council of the Mayor's recommended budget is
summarized below:
10/1 Mayor's presentation of proposed 2014 City Budget.
10/22 Department presentations
10/29 Department presentations
11/4 Council Budget Public Hearing
11/12 Possible Budget Work Session*
11/19 Council Budget Adoption
*Council may choose to schedule a Budget Work Session on November 12 following earlier than usual
scheduled committee meetings. The Budget Work Session would allow Council members to discuss the
proposed budget and possible amendments.
Public testimony will be taken on the budget workshops and at the Council Public Hearing on the 4th.
The first workshop will begin with a summary review of the 2014 budget compared to the 2013 budget.
Particular attention would be focused upon the economic projection, a multi -year strategic forecast for
the City's General Fund and its fund balances, and review and explanation of the major changes in
revenues and expenditures in the 2014 budget.
Each department will make a brief presentation on their budget. Departments will be encouraged to use
PowerPoint presentations as appropriate. The Public Works Department will make three presentations:
One for Streets, one for the three Utilities, and one for Facilities Maintenance, ER&R, and Engineering.
Finance's proposal for the format for these budget presentations by each department is shown below.
a. Up to three minute presentation on department's 2013 accomplishments.
b. A brief review of the business challenges and uncertainties for the department in the coming year.
c. A brief review comparing department's year end projected actual expenditures and revenues to
Packet Page 132 of 133
budgeted levels with an explanation of how and why there are material differences between the projected
actuals and the budgeted appropriations.
d. A brief review of what is different about the 2014 budget proposal than the current budget. This
review should emphasize decision packages, why those changes and decision packages are being
recommended and what will be the impact on outcomes to the City and its citizens.
e. Responses to Council questions regarding their department's budget.
A proposed schedule of presentations is listed below:
October 22nd:
1. Municipal Court; 2. City Clerk; 3. Mayor's Office; 4. Council; 5. Human Resources; 6. Economic
Development; 7. Finance & Information Services; 8. Nondepartmental (Presented by Finance); 9.
Development Services; and 10. Parks.
October 29th:
1. Police; 2. Public Works Utilities; 3. Public Works Roads; and 4. Public Works Administration,
Facilities Maintenance, ER&R & Engineering.
To the extent that the 22nd session presentations overrun available time, remaining departments may be
deferred to October 29th.
Inbox
City Clerk
Mayor
Finalize for Agenda
Fonn Started By: Roger Neumaier
Final Approval Date: 10/17/2013
Form Review
Reviewed By
Date
Sandy Chase
10/17/2013 03:45 PM
Dave Earling
10/17/2013 03:49 PM
Sandy Chase
10/17/2013 03:50 PM
Started On: 10/17/2013 02:00 PM
Packet Page 133 of 133