Loading...
RESUB-Tree PlanG ENV April 18, 2021 City of Edmonds Planning Division 121 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Tree Protection Plan for Temporary Office Mr. Shipley, Glacier Environmental Services Inc. (Glacier) has applied for a Land Use Permit (PLN2022-0012) to place a Temporary Building at the 7509 212t" St SW property we are planning to develop. Our initial location for the temporary office has changed due to the stormwater retention design that was developed after our initial application. We have decided to locate the temp office towards the back of the parcel where it will not be in the way of the construction. While we have relocated the building, we will still need to remove some of the existing trees for delivery access. Our overall Tree Protection Plan for the project is submitted with the Design Review/CUP application PLN2022-0028, but I have marked which trees will be removed for this first phase of the project in the attached plan. You will see the other trees slated for eventual removal in a lighter shade, I have also highlighted the "Phase 1" Trees on the table. This application includes removal of 16 of the 77 significant trees on the site, 3 of which have been designated as Hazardous. A copy of the arborist report prepared for the overall site development is also attached. Please feel free to reach out should you have any questions regarding this plan. Sincerely, ,[��2� �d�Q.l'i2l�G4:,GL►�i Lauren Golembiewski President Glacier Environmental Services, Inc PO Box 1097 Mukilteo, WA 98275 P: (425) 355-2826 www.glacierenviro.com EA\E FENCE 0.VW OF PROP COR FENCE OXW OF PROP LINE I CUP END 0.1E OF N \ IT PROP UNE + 3.8' 8.5' I� w ,2, I <1 LLJ I 1 I EV I L 1 > I � EL= NO / � \ I 4"EVG I � ♦ 424.5' 1 /' \ I '� I I I \ I FENCEP OXE OF 22• PROP PLO° 00��\F.`' yp I / I / \ \ LINE p1p QQpv s a / 4zDA i 01, M f \ \ FENCE COR 419 \ 0.1E OF PROP LINE ,6B I/ g I A I zoro C0 FOUND REBAR CAP 42.2 PLANTER ° /B7 TUNE UNE I , \ a HA •W I/ a\ � �I 22 BLDG HEICHi=8.5' 22 B CR10 I `"- CCNC • DONC 19 B A SEARS ° PATIO FF EL-421.9' PP�p O�JN�\G I ODIC . a /a SHED CDR 9669F� I PORCH PROP OF I PROP LINE a, I � / / I / vs' I I I ORA111 EDGE/ I 1'41P�' 22 15.6' ) FENCE END I 0.4E IFI \ I J DIE OF I PROP UNE I I \ ° 1,.9' PROP UNE I I / I� I T k / I I VE HOUSE N0. FOOTPRINT=T= 12.17 I I II I I FF ELTF 9' = I � 424.6' 29.6' Q . I 7.4' 19.4' ° EA\F ° / 5'DEC FENCE INTX Q3*E OF k I I 1 \ 1 PROP NE k X CRAWL EDGE I gi\ CONC ` 1 X PROP TIE /82 HBGHT-g PORCH \ X I 4 I g'S CONCEPTUAL � 529' \ NATURAL GAS PENCE DDR � EAYE METER LOCATION I ON NE I I I FF EL= CONCEPTUAL I I 419.4' I POWER 0', OF u METER PROP UNE ASPHALT I O /B4 4Tg DRIVEWAY LOCATION FOUND REBAR/CAP I / I I AR — I ` \p \ WN u�" O SET REBAR/DAP ' o " +� ` \ NE ArPROP D %, PRELIMINARY ' I1 / 1 ELECTRIC ' ` " \ \ 10EU=CTRICAL POWER POINT ❑ EPER ASEMENT G `` 419G / `\\ 20I6017 G 0520 141 OF CONNECTION CONCEPTUAL ELECTRIC as I PRELIMINARY / POWER SERVICE LINE - ' - - - ,FENN(E� NATURAL GAS / T - - POINT OF / I ALIGNMENT T _PROP CDR CONNECTION 0A A+ CONCEPTUAL �°� A' P P P P P I NATURAL GAS _ - - SERVCE LINE _ _ _ , _ _ _ - p 4 , ° —m —. T— P ° ALIGNMENT - ° °p $ P/• �P ° ° ' T�L•VLl • . ✓ °' CONO SIDEWALK P •° P P P P cB (T PE z) ° ° �I�� 7 CURB ` ' SET REBAR/CAP 416.69• Q O ` \ FO VLT ` \ AT PROP COR ' ACCESS (TYPE 1) w W �V W� V1 — W W W W LANESTRIPING W W W ° a ` F�sj�oHFa,.4r 212TH ST SW , ` �—\SID — SD SD — T SD SD SD — SD SD SD — SD \ (P IC RIGHT OF WAY)_ _ (n i ( SS SS,' SS — SS SS SS SS SS'` SS SS SS SS S Ss — LANE STRIPING\� o ' TREE PLAN SUMMARY TABLE TREE ID TYPE DBH (INCHES) CROWN CONDITON NOTES PROPOSED STATUS 1 FIR 20 35 FAIR RETAIN 2 FIR 24 40 POOR IVY, CO-DOM (3) RETAIN 3 FIR 22 35 FAIR IVY, CO-DOM RETAIN 4 FIR 18 35 FAIR IVY RETAIN 5 FIR 8 12 RETAIN 6 MAPLE 24 32 POOR CO-DOM, INCLUDED BARK, DECAY RETAIN 7 MADRONA 14 25 FAIR RETAIN 8 FIR 23 40 FAIR -GOOD LOPSIDED CROWN RETAIN 9 MAPLE 8 20 POOR MOSTLY DEAD RETAIN 10 FIR 8 20 POOR RETAIN 11 FIR 21 35 GOOD LOPSIDED CROWN RETAIN 42 F4R 6 45 DFAD DELETED FROM LIST QC('el Icc IT IS; nCen DELETED 13 FIR 10 28 FAIR IVY, LOPSIDED CROWN RETAIN 14 FIR 20 32 FAIR IVY, LOPSIDED CROWN RETAIN 15 MADRONA 16 28 FAIR IVY, LEANING RETAIN 16 FIR 24 20 FAIR IVY RETAIN 17 CEDAR 12 28 FAIR LEANING, LOPSIDED CROWN RETAIN 18 CEDAR 19 38 FAIR CO-DOM RETAIN 19 DECEDUOUS 8 20 POOR RETAIN 20 MADRONA 8 20 POOR IVY, LEANING RETAIN 21 MADRONA 13 28 FAIR IVY, LEANING, DECAY POCKET AT BASE RETAIN 22 MADRONA 10 30 GOOD RETAIN 23 MADRONA 11 32 FAIR IVY, SPARSE CANOPY RETAIN 24 FIR 30 45 GOOD IVY RETAIN 25 FIR 22 35 FAIR IVY RETAIN 26 MADRONA 45 60 FAIR CONSIDERABLE DIE -BACK, DECAY, REMOVE N. LEADER RETAIN 27 CHERRY 6 12 RETAIN 28 FIR 14 30 POOR LARGE DECAY POCKET AT BASE RETAIN 29 FIR 22 35 GOOD IVY RETAIN 30 FIR 18 20 FAIR LOPSIDED CANOPY RETAIN 31 CHERRY 6 18 RETAIN 32 CHERRY 8 20 POOR CRITICAL LEAN RETAIN 33 CHERRY 6 12 RETAIN 34 FIR 23 45 FAIR DECAY POCKETS RETAIN 35 FIR 26 40 FAIR DECAY AT BASE REMOVE 36 FIR 28 45 FAIR CO-DOM, SIGNIFIGANT DECAY, HAZARD REMOVE 37 FIR 25 35 FAIR REMOVE 38 FIR 28 45 FAIR REMOVE 39 FIR 25 45 FAIR REMOVE 40 FIR 19 45 FAIR REMOVE 41 FIR 26 42 FAIR DECAY POCKET @ BASE, SAP REMOVE 42 FIR 24 43 GOOD EXPOSED BUTRESS ROOT REMOVE 43 FIR 28 45 FAIR DECAY @ BASE, SAP RUNNING REMOVE 44 FIR 18 40 GOOD RETAIN 45 PINE 10 20 FAIR RETAIN 46 MADRONA 6 12 FAIR RETAIN 47 FIR 18 30 POOR DECAY POCKETS, LOPSIDED CROWN, POOR, HAZARD REMOVE 48 FIR 13 28 POOR LOPSIDED CROWN, IVY, HAZARD REMOVE 49 FIR 18 36 FAIR DECAY POCKETS, IVY REMOVE 50 MADRONA 4 40 RE11AOVED FROM LIST BECAUSE IT IQ SMALLER ER TH N &" 51 FIR 12 20 POOR LOPSIDED CROWN, SAP, HAZARD REMOVE 52 FIR 24 36 POOR MAJOR SAP, DECAY, HAZARD REMOVE 53 FIR 16 32 FAIR IVY REMOVE 54 FIR 14 16 FAIR RETAIN 55 FIR 30 40 GOOD LOPSIDED CROWN, IVY REMOVE 56 FIR 14 24 GOOD IVY REMOVE 57 FIR 8 16 POOR IVY, HAZARD REMOVE 58 FIR 22 32 FAIR REMOVE 59 FIR 21 36 FAIR LOPSIDED CROWN RETAIN 60 HOLLY v_ 5 42 DELETED FROM LIST IT IS SMALLER ER THAN 6" DELETED 61 FIR 36 48 GOOD REMOVE 62 FIR 12 24 FAIR REMOVE 63 FIR 9 24 FAIR REMOVE 64 FIR 14 28 POOR SAP REMOVE 65 FIR 30 40 GOOD REMOVE 66 BIRCH 8 20 POOR CO-DOM, SAP SUCKERS, HALF DEAD, HAZARD REMOVE 67 HAWTHORNE 12 20 GOOD RETAIN 68 DECEDUOUS 20 24 GOOD RETAIN 69 ICI eNn GYPRGQQ 5 42 DELETED FROM I IQT IT IQ CAAAI I CR THAN 8" DELETED 70 I EI eNn CYPRESS 5 42 DELETED FROM LIST IT IS SMA I CR TK DELETED 71 EVERGREEN 20 24 POOR TOPPED, IN POWER LINES, HAZARD REMOVE 72 SPRUCE 13 24 POOR HAZARD REMOVE 73 ARBORVITAE 22 24 POOR TOPPED REMOVE 74 CYPRESS 20 20 POOR IVY, HAZARD REMOVE 75 EVERGREEN 40 20 POO DELETED FROM LIST BECAUSE IT IS THE SAME TREE AS 74 DELETED 76 ARBORVITAE 19 FAIR TOPPED REMOVE 77 ARBORVITAE 41 FAIR TOPPED REMOVE 78 ARBORVITAE 31 FAIR TOPPED REMOVE 79 ARBORVITAE 16 POOR TOPPED REMOVE 80 ARBORVITAE 29 POOR TOPPED REMOVE 81 ARBORVITAE 17 POOR TOPPED REMOVE 82 ARBORVITAE 24 POOR TOPPED, 1/2 DEAD, HAZARD REMOVE 83 ARBORVITAE 16 POOR TOPPED REMOVE 84 ARBORVITAE 47 POOR TOPPED REMOVE SUMMARY TOTAL SIGNIFIGANT TREES 77 NUMBER OF SIGNIFIGANT TREES IDENTIFIED FOR REMOVAL 38 NUMBER OF SIGNIFIGANT TREES IDENTIFIED TO RETAIN 39 HAZARD TREES 11 TREE PLAN LEGEND o ® o 0 EXISTING TREES TO BE RETAINED (E.G.) 10" DEC 10" EVG K 0 EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (E.G.) 1 10" DEC 10"oEVG EXISTING OFFSITE TREES (E.G.) 20 0 20 MENSI SCALE IN FEET TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION FENCE z _o J ~ Q a 2E U) m IL D o `1)LU Z U) o D U) 0 5; z w Q o� Q Q a LU } w ir z z � J cn W LU 0' o a CV CV O O W Q O O W V J 0 0 �n LU d 4 m o Q r2 � N u 0- ,2N'0 — a LU a c v a c a_ U u F- ti J WO 00 3:m LU= z O 2z D z�oLU z LU u)w » VLUQ LU j 9i �U) U,0 LU a_C) N J L0 z M J J NJ LU O a J z 0- Z O LU l— W E Z ~ rO V X W o W W �>co N O 0-Ozp cl)O-zT CD �wz(.0 g�c=o cn Q O ONQ¢ N z zrnp O C) X w Lu TREES REMOVED DURING PHASE 1 8.(TEMP OFFICE ACCESS) Know what's below. Call before you dig. PROJECT LOCATION (S,T,R): A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 SEC. 20, TWP. 27N, RNG. 4E, W.M. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION JURISDICTION FILE NO.: CITY OF EDMONDS PRE2021-0013 FARALLON PROJECT NO.: DATE: 416-018 SHEET BY: L1.50 CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION Shelley Towers Landscape Design Certifled Arborist, ISA, TRAO 425.923.8375 sdti ns noayah.. — April 1, 2022 Lauren Golembiewski DRT Holdings LLC 19215 92nd Ave W Edmonds, WA 98020 RE: Arborist Report for Tree Retention & Protection Plan 7509 212th St SW Edmonds, WA 98026 Dear Ms. Golembiewski, A Grand Design has prepared this report for use by Glacier Environmental Services, Inc./DRT Holdings LLC as part of the Tree Retention and Protection Plan in accordance with City of Edmonds Development Code 23.10.060 B. Tree Inventory and Identification An inventory of all onsite trees was conducted on February 14th, 2022 and is included in the attached Tree Plan. Significant trees as identified by your land surveyors were numbered with metal tags and are listed accordingly. During my site visit I measured each tree to verify the Diameter at Breast Height (DBH), and evaluate each tree's health, condition and viability. Trees that were included in the topographic survey, but measured under 6-inches or were dead, have been removed from the inventory. Off -property trees and their crowns are shown on the figure but have not been assigned a number or tagged. All on -site trees were evaluated for species, size, crown spread and condition. In summary, there are a total of 77 significant trees on the project site. The diversity is low and comprised mostly of four species including: Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata), Pacific Madrone (Arbutus, madrona) and Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis). Most of the trees are evergreens (predominantly Douglas firs) with diameters ranging between 10 and 30 inches. Of the 77 significant trees onsite, I have identified 11 trees as hazardous due to their poor condition and/or damage. Multiple of the trees onsite appear to have been previously topped and have since developed codominant leaders which weaken the structure of the tree and increase risk of failure. I also noted multiple trees in poor condition with large decay pockets at the base. The specific condition of each hazard tree is listed in the inventory. Several trees were noted to have significant English Ivy (Hedera helix) invasion. I understand some of these trees are outside the development area and will be further evaluated after removal of the invasive ivy. June 4, 2020 Miles Vegetation Management Plan Page 2 Tree Removal Related to Development and Impact to Remaining Trees My understanding is that redevelopment does not include the northern area of the site and those trees will remain. The majority of trees removed due to development are a large grouping in the middle of the site. Retained trees will not be impacted by the removal of the trees related to development. Protection of Trees to Remain Individual and groupings of trees that are designated to remain should be protected from construction activities. Orange snow fence should be erected and maintained around the protected areas. If excavation is planned within the critical root zone of any tree to remain, it should be done under the supervision and /or guidance of a tree professional. This may include protection of the roots with mulch and plywood or steel plates, or hand excavation. I understand that the excavation at the northern end of the site is primarily limited to grading for repaving and will be shallow. This should not impact the root systems of the nearby trees. Excavation should be done with the body of the machine outside the driplines. All spoils should be removed from within the dripline. If heavy equipment needs to traverse within the dripline, 4" of woodchips and plywood should be laid down first and then removed as soon as possible. Protection fencing should be kept in place to the extent possible during excavation and replaced as soon as possible afterwards if removed. There is one storm drain located within the dripline of tree #34, however the excavation extends less than 25% into the dripline of the tree and should not affect the health of the root system. The same conditions above should apply, excavator sit outside the dripline and do not stockpile spoils within the crown area. Disclaimer This Plan is based on readily observable and ascertainable conditions. Some information was provided by others. Tree condition evaluations were based upon visual inspections of the outward conditions of trees. Unforeseen events such as weather and construction activities can lead to tree failure, therefore A Grand Design, LLC cannot be held liable for future failure of trees either during construction or following its completion. The work for this report has conformed to the standard of care employed by ISA Certified Arborists. No other representation or warranty is made concerning the work or this report and any implied representation or warranty is claimed. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, A Grand Design Shelley Towers ISA, TRAQ Consulting Arborist ISA Certification # PN5802A A Grand Design, LLC 7914 60th Street Southwest Snohomish, Washington 98290-5127 (425) 923-8375