Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2014.09.23 CC Agenda Packet
AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers ~ Public Safety Complex 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds SPECIAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 6:30 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 1.(30 Minutes)Convene in executive session regarding collective bargaining per RCW 42.30.140(1)(a). REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 23, 2014 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2.(5 Minutes)Roll Call 3.(5 Minutes)Approval of Agenda 4.(5 Minutes)Approval of Consent Agenda Items A.AM-7151 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of September 16, 2014. B.AM-7141 Approval of claim checks #210337 through #210346 dated September 4, 2014 for $26,625.76, claim check #210347 dated September 5, 2014 and claim checks #210348 through #210517 dated September 11, 2014 total $2,423,039.38. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #61167 through #61178 for $467,673.17 and #61188 for $750.01, benefit checks #61179 through #61187 for $91,649.44 and wire payments for $312,987.24 for the period of August 16, 2014 through August 31, 2014. C.AM-7152 Approval of claim checks #210519 through #210629 dated September 18, 2014 for Packet Page 1 of 349 C.AM-7152 Approval of claim checks #210519 through #210629 dated September 18, 2014 for $253,666.59. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks (replacement check #61065 through #61066) #61069 through #61085 for $476,165.93, benefit checks#61068, #61086 through #61094 and wire payments of $423,990.52 for the period June 16, 2014 through June 30, 2014. 5.(5 Minutes) AM-7132 Arbor Day Proclamation 6.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)* *Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings 7.(15 Minutes) AM-7154 Update on Edmonds Arts Commission temporary art projects on 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor 8.(15 Minutes) AM-7158 Presentation on Development Projects and Activities 9.(30 Minutes) AM-7157 Presentation and Discussion on the Capital Facilities Plan/Capital Improvement Program Process. 10.(60 Minutes) AM-7156 Study Session regarding the Planning Board's recommendation for proposed zoning changes to Westgate. 11.(15 Minutes)Report on outside Board and Committee meetings 12.(5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments 13.(15 Minutes)Council Comments 14.Convene in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). 15.Reconvene in open session. Potential action as a result of meeting in executive session. ADJOURN Packet Page 2 of 349 AM-7151 4. A. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:09/23/2014 Time:Consent Submitted By:Scott Passey Department:City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of September 16, 2014. Recommendation Review and approve meeting minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative The draft minutes are attached. Attachments Attachment 1 - 09-16-14 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Form Review Form Started By: Scott Passey Started On: 09/16/2014 09:16 AM Final Approval Date: 09/16/2014 Packet Page 3 of 349 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES September 16, 2014 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:15 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Diane Buckshnis, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember Joan Bloom, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Strom Peterson, Councilmember Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember ALSO PRESENT Noushyal Eslami, Student Representative STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Shane Hope, Development Services Director Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Rob Chave, Planning Manager Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Brian Tuley, IT Supervisor Rob English, City Engineer Sharon Cates, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Gerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PER RCW 42.30.140(1)(a) AND POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) At 6:15 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding collective bargaining per RCW 42.30.140(1)(a) and potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i).He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 45 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers Johnson, Buckshnis, Petso, Bloom and Mesaros. Others present were City Attorney Sharon Cates, Parks & Recreation/Human Resources Reporting Director Carrie Hite, Human Resources Manager MaryAnn Hardie, and City Clerk Scott Passey. The executive session concluded at 6:58 p.m. Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. and led the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmembers Peterson and Fraley-Monillas. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Packet Page 4 of 349 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Bloom requested Items B and E be removed from the Consent Agenda and Councilmember Petso requested Item D be removed. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 C. 2014 JULY MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT F. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PERTEET FOR THE 228TH ST. SW CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT G. APPROVAL TO SURPLUS COMPUTER EQUIPMENT H. ADOPTION OF LAW SUPPORT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT FOR 2014-2016 ITEM B: APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #210337 THROUGH #210346 DATED SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 FOR $26,625.76, CLAIM CHECK #210347 DATED SEPTEMBER 5, 2014 AND CLAIM CHECKS #210348 THROUGH #210517 DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 TOTAL $2,423,039.38. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS #61167 THROUGH #61178 FOR $467,673.17 AND #61188 FOR $750.01, BENEFIT CHECKS #61179 THROUGH #61187 FOR $91,649.44 AND WIRE PAYMENTS FOR $312,987.24 FOR THE PERIOD OF AUGUST 16, 2014 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2014 Councilmember Bloom pointed out the September 4, 2014 vouchers were listed twice in the packet and the September 11, 2014 vouchers were not listed in the packet. The September 11, 2014 vouchers were forwarded to the Council late today. She asked whether the Council could approve the September 11, 2014 vouchers if they were not in the packet. City Attorney Sharon Cates advised she would need to research that. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO SCHEDULE APPROVAL OF THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2014 VOUCHERS ON NEXT WEEK’S AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ITEM D: AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FEHR & PEERS FOR THE 2015 TRANSPORTATION PLAN Councilmember Petso asked, 1) because the plan will be done over the winter, what adjustments if any will be made for ferry traffic, and 2) whether the plan will address Pt. Wells. Public Works Director Phil Williams did not recall a specific conversation with the consultant regarding Pt. Wells but they will do growth projections on traffic in the system. Impacts on several intersections in Edmonds from Pt. Wells, assuming that project is built, could be added to the consultant’s work. With regard to accounting for summer ferry traffic, Mr. Williams explained existing data prepared by DOT ferries division could be used to graph the seasonal difference in ferry traffic even if the study did not include that season. Councilmember Petso asked whether she could assume the upcoming Transportation Plan would include consideration of Pt. Wells and ferry traffic seasonality. Mr. Williams answered she could make that assumption. Packet Page 5 of 349 COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE ITEM D. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ITEM E: AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FEHR & PEERS FOR THE SR-104 COMPLETE STREET CORRIDOR ANALYSIS Councilmember Johnson acknowledged the long awaited corridor study for SR-104 is being authorized via approval of this item. She looked forward to the results of this study and incorporating them in the plans for the Westgate area. Councilmember Bloom relayed there were a lot of questions at the Town Hall meeting she held from people who shop in Westgate as well as from one property owner about parking at Westgate. She referred to the parking section which states, no formal parking demand inventory will be conducted. The consultant will also conduct a parking evaluation for the proposed Westgate zoning to determine reasonable parking demand for a mixed use development. She asked what was meant by no formal parking demand inventory will be conducted. Mr. Williams answered the study will look in detail at the parking needs and potential solutions at Westgate but a citywide parking inventory study will not be done. Councilmember Bloom asked whether there would be significant parking study, noting that was a major concern at the Town Hall meeting. Mr. Williams answered yes, not a standalone study but that work will be done as part of overall analysis. COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO APPROVE ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Don Hall, Edmonds, referred to the minutes of the Public Safety and Personnel Committee meeting, commenting it was great to see that a code of ethics was getting close to reality. The minutes reflect Councilmember Fraley-Monillas’ suggestion that enforcement be a separate policy. He agreed it probably should be, but if they are not passed together there is no reason to have a code of ethics because without a policy and procedure to address potential violations and a public process to resolve complaints, a code of ethics is only a piece of paper that means nothing. He feared if the code of ethics and enforcement policy were not adopted together, it would take another 2½ years to adopt an enforcement policy. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, commented $1.76 million bill from Fire District 1 was not considered when the City contracted with FD1. He recommended initiating a new Edmonds Fire Department and getting out of the contract with FD1. With regard to the traffic survey, his research regard the complete streets analysis has little to do with biggest problem in the Westgate Plan, how to get cars in and out with the tremendous amount of ferry traffic. He expressed concern that Councilmembers have never expressed what they want the study to analyze and staff and the consultant developed their own criteria. He requested the Council have a public discussion with the consultant regarding the plan for the transportation study, pointing out this is an opportunity to analyze traffic at Westgate and Pt. Wells as well as ferry traffic. 6. PRESENTATION FROM EDMONDS DOWNTOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (EDBID) Pam Stuller, Walnut Street Coffee, President, EDBID, provided a list of the Advisory Board Members: • David Arista, Arista Wine Cellars • Robert Boehlke, House Wares • Natalie-Pascale-Boisseau, Innate Radiance Packet Page 6 of 349 • Juliana Van Buskirk, Edward Jones • Cadence Clyborne, HDR Engineering • Sally Merck, Merck Counseling Services • Paul Rucker, Saetia • Mary Kay Sneeringer, Edmonds Bookshop • Jordana Turner, Edmonds Massage and Bodywork • Pam Stuller, Walnut Street Coffee • Kim Wahl, Reliable Floor Coverings She reported on process for developing branding and identity: • RFP • High caliber response – 20 excellent applicants • Decision matrix • Interview process • Hired Turnstyle Studio She provided ideas from the brand manifesto that the design team used to develop visuals, graphics, fonts, etc. of the visual identity: • In most of our lives we face abundant choices, and access to every-more-convenient amenities • And the great paradox is that – despite our greater connectivity, increasing choice and rising consumption – many feel even more dislocated, stressed for time and somewhat unfulfilled… • Our retail malls are packaged; • Our stores are concepts; • Our meals are taste-lab tested; • Our apparel and styles are representative; • Our apartments and communities are derivative of other places, and • Our human interactions are increasingly remote, virtual and binary… • But in a geologic basin, along the shores of Puget Sound lies the Town of Edmonds • Now this Town isn’t just a place, it’s an idea… • An interdependent shoreside community – living, working and playing in a positive spirt of independence. • The residents here prize their connections to people and community. • And the natural beauty strolling from the front door… • For locals, tumbling into Town is a time-held practice of refreshing and reconnecting. • For visitors, Town is just a little out of the way – but an accessible escape. • Just four miles down the hill, and light years from “same.” • Town is something you take part in, an antidote to alone, superficial, impersonal and predictable • There is a practical idealism about Town: a place that necessarily grows and changes, but yet retains a character and values gifted to us; • A contemporary expression of a constant truth in how humans at their very best can interact. Scenic, safe and social – Town represents a new civility… • Everyday life creates an environment that stresses and contorts our true self. Who we are, what we value, how we perceive becomes steadily occluded by our work, societal and commercial environments. • Over time we become dislocated from who we are, and who we intended to be… • The Town you find in Downtown Edmonds, helps us recapture our better, original selves. We enable people to Return, Forward. She described the personality and values that came from the brand manifesto: Personality Friendly Quirky, Creative Happy Industrious Positive Packet Page 7 of 349 Values Neighborliness Originality Delight Enterprise Refreshment She relayed concepts that make a good name: • Memorable • Pronounceable • Spellable • Unique or different • Credible • Associative • Short • Available Their new name is: Ed! Edmonds Downtown Alliance. This name provides visual opportunities for fun, creative outlets: • Ability to anthropomorphize the place and the organization. A character named Ed who epitomizes the qualities of neighborliness we want to project • Or, think of Ed! as the nickname for Edmonds and the Edmonds Downtown Alliance. Imagine a series of different faces (a child, an adult, even a dog on the beach), each with a name tag saying the same thing: “Hello, my name is Ed!” We are all Ed! – welcoming, positive, approachable • When communicating in an official capacity or to a business audience, Ed! can be downplayed and Edmonds Downtown Alliance can lead the conversation. The nickname “Ed!” is a logical abbreviation of Edmonds so it’s a natural fit. She displayed the logo, collateral materials (letterhead, business cards, buttons), ways to use Ed! at the end of a word (investEd!, spiritEd!, delightEd!), print advertisement, an illustration to round out the visual package, and examples of a banner and a tote bag. Ms. Stuller described their new website, explaining the primary focus is the directory, driving visitors to local businesses, eat & drink, services, and shopping. The website includes links to “Friends of Ed!” such as the Edmonds Historical Museum, Edmonds Center for the Arts, Chamber of Commerce, etc. The homepage of the website has links to businesses within the business district and every business within the BID will get their own, individual webpage. She provided a mid-year update: • Progress! • Brand creation, name and logo • Optimized website • Collaboration o Edmonds Community College Marketing Program o IB program at Edmonds-Woodway High School o Luncheon, September 24 at 11:30 in the Brackett Room at City Hall • Catalyst for action – signage • Encourage walkability – umbrella program • Share knowledge – business seminar • Engage members – small grants program • Leverage funding – 501c3 charity She reviewed 2014 Q2 Financials (as of June 30, 2014) Packet Page 8 of 349 Budget Q2 Actual Assessments (Revenue) $89,000 $45,745 Total Expenditures 2014 $80,000 $13,522 Balance (thru Q2) 32,223 She encouraged the Council to attend the Advisory Board’s meetings on the second and fourth Thursday of the month at 8:00 a.m. in Room 225 at Edmonds Center for the Arts. The EDBID will submit their 2015 work plan to the Council by October 1. Councilmember Petso requested Ms. Stuller review the founding documents developed when the EDBID was formed to ensure the small grants program that was included. She found it odd that businesses would be taxed and funds then directed to an individual businesses. Ms. Stuller explained the idea behind the grants program is the member’s request must fit the scope of work and the mission of the organization. There will be well-defined decision criteria. Councilmember Petso acknowledged it may be a good idea but it may be that that EDBID is not the organization to implement that idea. Council President Buckshnis commended the EDBID on the development of Ed! She asked about scheduling the work plan at an October Council meeting. Ms. Stuller offered to email her. Council President Buckshnis commended Ms. Stuller and other members for their efforts, recognizing the difficulty of running a business and doing volunteer work. 7. REPORT FROM THE PLANNING BOARD Neil Tibbott, Vice Chair, Planning Board, explained the Planning Board serves at the discretion of the City Council, working on projects the Council refers to them and issues that the City’s rules require be reviewed by the Planning Board. There is a great deal of cooperation on the Planning Board; its members have diverse talents and skills that provide opportunity to consider project details from a variety of angles. The Planning Board also has the luxury of an extended amount of time to address questions and deliberate which the Council often does not have. Vice Chair Tibbott described Planning Board activity since April 2014 Topic Action Taken Westgate Plan Two public hearings capping off five years of work Forwarded to City Council 6/11 Legal Lot Definition Working sessions and public hearing Forwarded to City Council CG and CG2 commercial use mandates Working sessions and public hearing Forwarded to City Council ECDC Rewrite Working sessions Stormwater Code Update Information meeting Adopting Performance Measures Information meeting With regard to the Westgate Form-based Code and Comprehensive Plan Update, he described three modifications the Planning Board made to the Westgate Plan: 1. Building heights reduced in one area from 45 feet to 35 feet in response to public input regarding proximity of the building to neighborhoods 2. Changed the UW study’s recommendation to narrow streets to two lanes 3. Increased setbacks between buildings and slopes in response to public input and to utilize the slopes in their natural habitat With regard to the CG and CG2 Updates, the Planning Board considered: • Permitted uses along Hwy 99 Packet Page 9 of 349 • Site Specific form-based code o Multi-use building vs multiple uses on the site • Parking options by use o Auto dealers o Retail vs. residential With regard to the Stormwater Code Update, the goal is to have stormwater handled onsite. The Planning Board considered: • Design goals o Pervious surfaces o Retention options • Discussed ongoing enforcement and compliance • Discussed homeowner resources The Planning Board also discussed the following Sustainability Performance Measures: • Land Use • Transportation • Community Health • Utilities • Economic development • Cultural & Recreational • Housing The Planning Board’s extended agenda includes: • September 2014 o Comprehensive Plan Housing Element o Presentation of Development Projects/Activities o Public hearing on Capital Facilities Plan element • October 2014 o Parks & Recreation Report Vice Chair Tibbott invited the Council’s input on items the Planning Board should prioritize. Council President Buckshnis recalled there was discussion of priorities at the joint meeting with the Planning Commission. She offered to schedule another joint meeting in November. Vice Chair Tibbott agreed joint meetings are a helpful way for the Planning Board to collaborate with the Council; the joint meeting assisted with establishing priorities. Council President Buckshnis advised the Council plans to hold two study sessions per month; a joint Planning Commission/City Council study session could be scheduled. Councilmember Johnson relayed there is a vacancy on the Planning Board. Vice Chair Tibbott advised the Planning Board’s expert on plants and landscaping has resigned. Councilmember Petso suggested an effort be made to get things in the right sequence, for example, the changes proposed on Highway 99 when the stormwater work has not yet been done. Any development on Highway 99 is likely to drain to Lake Ballinger where a great deal has been spent to clean it up and prevent flooding. One of her priority was working on the stormwater code as quickly as possible. She also expressed concern with the timing of items; when the joint meeting was held with the Planning Board regarding Highway 99 in April, the Planning Board had already committed at a February 26, 2014 meeting (which did not have a quorum) to pushing the Highway 99 amendments. She preferred to have Council discussion first and then the Council refers the item to the Planning Board. Packet Page 10 of 349 8. REPORT ON BIDS OPENED SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 FOR THE 15TH ST. WALKWAY (EDMONDS WAY TO 8TH AVE S) PROJECT AND POSSIBLE AWARD OF CONTRACT City Engineer Rob English referred to a map in the packet showing the limits of the project, explaining there was one change made to the geometry. The existing street is 40 feet wide; the proposed improvements will construct a 5-foot sidewalk on the south side of the street, 5 feet of street pavement will be removed, leaving 35 feet of street pavement with a 15-foot shared lane eastbound, a 13-foot lane westbound and a 7-foot parking lane on the north side. He described the project improvements • 650 feet of 5-foot sidewalk • 4 ADA compliant curb ramps • 2 Stormwater infiltration trenches • Bicycle sharrows • Pavement striping Mr. English reviewed the bid result; bids were opened September 10, 4 bids were received: Engineer’s Estimate: $222,420 Contractor bid result: Kamins Construction (low bid) $233,753 Road Construction NW $245,358 Aurora Rejected Trinity $256,475 He described the construction budget Item Cost Construction contract $233,753 Construction management $ 32,000 5% management reserve $ 11,700 Total $277,453 He reviewed construction funding: Funding Amount Safe Routes to Schools Grant (state grant) $251,000 Stormwater Utility Fund (422) $ 26,675 Total Construction Funding $277,675 Staff recommends awarding a contract to Kamins Construction for $233,752.62 and authorizing a 5% management reserve of $11,700. Councilmember Petso recalled public meetings were held regarding this project; she asked which plan was displayed at the meeting at Sherwood Elementary. Mr. English responded the public meeting covered whether to build the sidewalk on the north or south side. The meeting was in regard to 2 other walkway projects, 5 people attended regarding 15th Street and they all supported the south alignment which was one of the reasons the south side was chosen. Councilmember Petso asked whether they were informed parking would be added to one side of the street. Mr. English advised a flyer was sent to the residents along 15th Street showing the proposed parking on the north side, no parking on the south side and a sidewalk on the south side and requesting comments; no comments were received. Two people called about a month ago, one requested the sidewalk be constructed on the north side because he lived on the Packet Page 11 of 349 north side. The second person also requested the sidewalk be constructed on the north side due to concern for his landscaping. He was told the sidewalk would be built in the street which alleviated his concern. Councilmember Petso observed there was approximately 10 feet of right-of-way on each side of the street and asked why the extra right-of-way was not utilized to avoid narrowing the lane from 20 feet to 13 feet. Mr. English explained this is a residential street; the 40-foot width was felt to be oversized. A typical travel lane would be 12 feet with 7 feet of parking. The standards for residential street widths vary from 22 - 28 feet depending on the number of lots that front the street. He summarized 40 feet was a very wide street and it was felt there was enough width within the existing street to build the sidewalk which would help slow traffic, not add impervious area and minimize the impact to the property owners. Although there is 10 feet of right-of-way, much of it is landscaping maintained by the property owners. Councilmember Petso observed toward SR-104 there are 2 lanes, a dedicated right turn lane and a through lane. She asked whether the reduction to 13 feet and the parking would occur in that location as well. Mr. English advised the approach onto SR-104 will stay the same. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO KAMINS CONSTRUCTION FOR $233,752.62 AND AUTHORIZE A 5% MANAGEMENT RESERVE OF $11,700. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. PUBLIC HEARING ON POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF "LOT" (ECDC 21.55.010), DEFINING "LOT OF RECORD" (ECDC 21.55.015) AND ESTABLISHING A PROCESS FOR DETERMINING "INNOCENT PURCHASER" (ECDC 20.75.180). (AMD20140001) Senior Planner Kernen Lien explained this issue came to light late last year and early this year when the legal status of a number of properties came into question. He provided the following existing definitions: • ECDC 21.55.010 – Lot Lot means a single tract of land legally created as a separate building site with frontage on a street or access easement. For purposes of this code, adjoining lots under common ownership, which were created without subdivision or short subdivision approval from applicable city or county governments, shall be considered as one lot and subject to the regulations contained herein. The terms of this section shall apply regardless of whether the individual adjoining lots meet current zoning requirements. • ECDC 20.75.180 Violation – Permits No building permit, septic tank permit or other development permit, shall be issued for any lot, tract or parcel of land divided in violation of this chapter unless the applicant for such a permit has applied to the hearing examiner and obtained a ruling from the hearing examiner that the public interest will be not adversely affected thereby; provided, however, the prohibition contained in this section shall not apply to an innocent purchaser for value without actual notice. • ECDC 17.40.030 Nonconforming Lots No building permit, septic tank permit or other development permit, shall be issued for any lot, tract or parcel of land divided in violation of this chapter unless the applicant for such a permit has applied to the hearing examiner and obtained a ruling from the hearing examiner that the public interest will be not adversely affected thereby; provided, however, the prohibition contained in this section shall not apply to an innocent purchaser for value without actual notice. Mr. Lien explained one of the clearest examples of a legal lot is a lot created through the subdivision process. He displayed a time lapse map illustrating subdivisions that have occurred in the City from 1890 to the present. He provided an example of a plat becoming parcels, displaying a plat originally recorded in Packet Page 12 of 349 1915 where one short plat was recorded in 1983; additional parcels were created by other means outside the subdivision process which raised legal lot questions. The Planning Board proposed the following amendments: ECDC 21.55.010 – Lot Definition • Revised definition of lot to be consistent with RCW 58.17.020 • Keep portion of definition relating to common ownership ECDC 21.55.015 – Lot of Record (new definition) • Create new definition for Lot of Record • Platted Lots o Tied to specific dates around adoption of subdivision codes City of Edmonds Snohomish County • Unplatted Lots o Specific Washington State Law exemptions o Created prior to first City of Edmonds subdivision code (effective July 3, 1956) He explained the City has five historic plats in the downtown area that meet the R-6 zoning standard: • City of Edmonds • Brackett’s First Addition • Gephart’s First Addition • Kelloggs’s Plat • Albert B. Lord’s Grandview Addition He explained ECDC 20.75.180 Violation – Permits, the prohibition against issuing building permits on lots created outside the subdivision process does not apply to innocent purchaser. However, there are no criteria or a process to determine what an innocent purchaser is. He described the proposed innocent purchaser process: • ECDC 20.75.180 • Establish criteria to determine innocent purchaser (proposed criteria developed by City Attorney based on case law) • Innocent purchaser status may be approved subject to conditions of approval requiring the applicant to make improvements to the property that would likely have been required by the City had the property been properly subdivided unless it is determined that such improvements have already been constructed • Affirmative determination shall be recorded with the county auditor • Innocent purchaser determination as Type II decision in ECDC 20.010.003 (staff decision with notice to property owners within 300 feet) Councilmember Petso recalled the Planning Board minutes stated a desire to have the determinations filed with Snohomish County. Mr. Lien explained an affirmative decision of innocent purchaser would be filed with county auditor; the City attorney did not think it wise to record a negative decision. Councilmember Petso asked if the effect of adopting the proposal would be to convert lots that are presently not buildable into lots of record allowing the possibility that they could be built on. Mr. Lien answered it establishes what a lot record is; a lot of record is not necessarily a buildable lot. All the other City zoning, development and nonconforming standards would still apply. Councilmember Petso asked when a lot became a buildable lot, if it meets the standards, it conceivably be built on versus under the current process it could not be built on. Mr. Lien explained a lot of record is currently defined by case law; the City does not have a definition of a lot of record. The clearest example is a lot approved via the Packet Page 13 of 349 subdivision process. Property that is not a lot of record now will not become a lot of record by establishing this definition. This provides clarity regarding what a lot of record is. Councilmember Petso provided an example, a person purchases a house and there is a vacant parcel that the realtor says is not a buildable lot between the house and the view. She asked whether this change would allow that lot, although undersized, to be developed. Mr. Lien advised an undersized lot would still have to comply with nonconforming standards regarding a lot. There is reference to an innocent purchaser in the code today so someone could purchase a lot created outside the subdivision process and apply for innocent purchaser; there is just not any criterion or an established process. Councilmember Petso observed as long as a lot was within the percentage of legal size, it could be developed. Mr. Lien answered yes, it could be built on if it met the size standards in the nonconforming table. That is true even without this code update. For Councilmember Bloom, Mr. Lien reviewed the permit type chart in 20.01.003: Type I is an administrative decision with no notice; Type II including innocent purchaser is a staff decision with public notice; Type IIIA and IIIB are Hearing Examiner processes, Type IVA and IVB are quasi-judicial legislative actions and Type V is a legislative action. Innocent purchaser was added to the table as a Type II decision. Councilmember Bloom asked why Type II was chosen and whether there were any other options. Mr. Lien answered all the review types are options. Type II was recommended by the City Attorney because the criteria for innocent purchaser are clearly identified, allowing staff to make a determination. Type II also provides notice to property owners in the area; adjacent property owners may have information to be considered during the review process. Type II decisions are appealable to the Hearing Examiner. The Planning Board agreed with the City Attorney’s recommendation. Councilmember Bloom asked whether a lot could become nonconforming as a result of the City purchasing property from the property owner or the property owner giving property to the City for a walkway, roundabout, etc. Mr. Lien answered he was uncertain whether that had been looked at but the definition of nonconforming lot states it met the zoning standards when it was created. At Councilmember Bloom’s request, staff will research how the dedication or acquisition of right-of-way affects the status of a lot. That is not impacted by this code update as no changes are proposed to the nonconforming code. Mayor Earling opened public participation portion of public hearing. There were no members of the public present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Earling closed the public hearing and remanded to City Council for action. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING BOARD AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT 1 AND DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (3-2), COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON AND MESAROS VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM AND PETSO VOTING NO. 10. PUBLIC HEARING ON POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) MODIFYING THE PROVISIONS OF THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG) ZONES. THE AMENDMENTS FOCUS ON TWO SETS OF CHANGES: (1) PARKING. THE PARKING STANDARDS FOR ALL CG-ZONED PROPERTIES WOULD BE SET AT A UNIFORM STANDARD (1 SPACE PER 400 SQ. FT. OF LEASABLE BUILDING SPACE), AND POTENTIALLY FURTHER REDUCE THE PARKING STANDARD TO 1/600 SQ. FT. FOR PROPERTIES THAT ONLY HAVE FRONTAGE ADJOINING OTHER CG ZONES. THE AMENDMENTS WOULD ALSO PROVIDE FOR DEVELOPMENT-SPECIFIC PARKING STUDIES. (2) USES. THE AMENDMENTS WOULD REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR TWO FLOORS OF COMMERCIAL SPACE WITHIN ALL CG DEVELOPMENTS. MIXED USE Packet Page 14 of 349 DEVELOPMENTS WOULD BE ALLOWED WITH NO SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL SPACE REQUIREMENT Planning Manager Rob Chave explained the Planning Board’s recommended changes to the CG and CG2 zones focus on two sets of changes: 1. 2-floor commercial requirement before residential units can be added 2. Parking standards The Planning Board’s goals included: • Remove obstacles to development • Encourage retention of commercial uses while encouraging more residential uses along Highway 99 – develop a “community” • Take advantage of transit and other development scenarios developing along the corridor in other jurisdictions (Lynnwood, Shoreline, Everett) With regard to the commercial requirement, the current requirement is two floors of commercial before any residential can be built. The exception is large scale developments of two acres or more. The Planning Board: • Looked at different options with the focus on removing the requirement for two floors of commercial space: o No commercial requirement o Minimum requirement (e.g. some commercial requirement across the site) but not 2 floors • Recommended no requirement with a review after one year of experience With regard to parking standards, Mr. Chave explained parking is currently regulated by use. Parking standards are minimums and more parking can be provided. For example, Top Foods provided more than parking than was required. They later found they did not needed all the parking and began redeveloping the parking lot. With parking minimums, it is up to owner to decide how much parking to provide. Many jurisdictions have moved away from use standards and developed standard rates; rates can vary by location. During their review, the Planning Board: • Looked at two options: o Single blended rate of two-tiered parking requirement based on access to Highway 99 (1 per 400 square feet or 1 per 600 square feet (if only have Highway 99 frontage) o A parking study option was also considered, where a project-specific study could be approved in lieu of the specified standards • Recommended the two-tiered parking system and the study option Mr. Chave noted the packet includes other options considered by Planning Board for the Council’s consideration. Councilmember Bloom relayed her concern that all the information presented was related to Highway 99, and the CG zone at the Port was not discussed at all. She asked whether approving the Planning Board’s recommendation would change the zoning at the Port as well. Mr. Chave explained the Port is zoned CG but it is a contract rezone, a specific contract that regulates uses on the Port property. The contract rezone does not allow residential uses; anything related to mixed use or residential in the CG zones would not apply to the Port. The change to the parking standards would affect the Port property. The Port does not have frontage on Highway 99 so the parking requirement would be 1 per 400 square feet. Parking at the Port is currently regulated by use. The uses are largely office and light industrial which are less stringent than 1 per 400 square feet. Due to parking requirements for the health club, there is a mix of parking requirements and he estimated the current parking was approximately 1 per 400 square feet. Packet Page 15 of 349 Councilmember Bloom asked for clarification, due to the contract rezone none of the changes apply to the CG zones at the Port other than the parking. Mr. Chave explained the contract is very specific, excluding certain uses from the CG zone such as residential. None of the changes to commercial would affect the Port property because the contract rezone supersedes it. Councilmember Petso referred to the one year experiment and asked whether the code is automatically limited to 1 year. Mr. Chave explained that could to be done via ordinance; tonight the Council is authorizing the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance. Councilmember Petso referred to the February 26 meeting where the Planning Board did not have a quorum as only 3 commissioners were present. At a later meeting, when the Planning Board took action, there were only four commissioners present and one commissioner preferred to wait. She asked why the Planning Board was rushing this, noting the Council was also missing two members tonight. Mr. Chave explained the Planning Board had had a couple meetings and the commissioners present that night wanted to proceed. Councilmember Petso referred to a statement in the February 26 minutes that there have been discussions with the Top Food property owners who have expressed an interest in developing or upgrading the site which is currently underutilized. She asked whether there was any chance that the proposal to allow 100% residential on Highway 99 was the reason the grocery store closed. Mr. Chave answered that chance was probably zero because it preceded this discussion. The Top Foods transaction involved many properties throughout Puget Sound and was not site specific. Councilmember Petso recalled one alternative to risking the loss of an existing businesses such as a car dealership and/or grocery store to 100% housing was to limit 100% housing to properties that could demonstrate commercial challenges. She has been told that some of the properties on Highway 99 have topographical challenges and that viable commercial is difficult on some properties due to an awkward or unusual shape. She asked whether the Highway 99 Task Force or the Planning Board discussed limiting the residential experiment to just the properties that could demonstrate they have commercial challenges. Mr. Chave answered there was no discussion like that; he was unsure what criteria would be used. Councilmember Petso asked whether there was any discussion about the risk of losing large, revenue generating car dealerships to housing. Mr. Chave answered that was highly unlikely but anything was possible. Councilmember Petso asked whether there was any discussion regarding the effects on Lake Ballinger. When serving on the Lake Ballinger Task Force, she learned about flooding due to rain events as well as water quality issues. A study has been done regarding the amount of impervious surface in the area; she asked whether increasing impervious surface would make the situation at Lake Ballinger worse or would development be required to require clean and retain their stormwater. Mr. Chave answered any redevelopment would be required to meet current standards. For example, Dicks had to deal with the stormwater on their property. Councilmember Petso said the February 26 Planning Board minutes refer to allowing parking on the ground floor. She asked whether parking on the ground floor would be encouraged or permitted. Mr. Chave it was not encouraged, it was not permitted now and he was uncertain how that could be done. Councilmember Petso asked whether consideration had been given to requiring a property that developed entirely residential to comply with the multi-family code, observing multi-family residential parcels have requirements such as side setbacks that the CG zone does not have. Mr. Chave answered no, the multi- family code comes into play with the parking standards, otherwise building codes largely govern multi- family. Councilmember Petso observed in multi-family zones elsewhere in the City there would be a 15- foot side setback; she asked whether the side setback for multi-family residential on Highway 99 would Packet Page 16 of 349 only be what the fire code required. Mr. Chave answered that was essential the same as downtown; there are residential setback and street setbacks, commercial zones do not have side setbacks. It is common to have multiple properties under a single ownership; requiring a side setback would heavily restrict how a project could be designed. Councilmember Petso asked whether there was a rear setback on Highway 99. Mr. Chave answered there is a residential setback. Council President Buckshnis relayed the action requested tonight is to direct the City Attorney to create an ordinance that will be returned to the Council which will allow Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas and Peterson to provide input if they have any concerns. Neither Councilmember Fraley-Monillas nor Peterson objected to the Council reviewing this in their absence. Council President Buckshnis asked whether a developer could pay for a parking study if they wished. Mr. Chave answered yes, under the proposed code; that is not currently included in the code. Council President Buckshnis asked how to prevent a developer paying someone to write a report saying they needed a lower parking requirement. Mr. Chave responded a developer would need to justify with clear evidence why a lower parking standard would work. Staff would be looking for hard experience; for example, a developer who has done mixed use in transit locations and can demonstrate the parking works and that the proposed development is in a similar location. Councilmember Johnson observed there are two standards proposed for the parking, one is related to protection of overflow parking. She asked whether any analysis had been done of the streets that could be affected by on-street parking or what lots have an abutting CG or CG2 zone. Mr. Chave answered property with only frontage on Highway 99 would have the less stringent parking requirement. Properties with frontage on streets other than Highway 99 would be required to meet higher parking standards. Councilmember Johnson asked whether there was any current data regarding the number of parking spaces that currently exist in the Highway 99 corridor. Mr. Chave answered no, explaining that would be a large project. The 1 per 400 square feet is more stringent than the old downtown standards (1 space per 500 square feet). That standard was established due to the amount of on-street parking downtown; there is little on-street parking on Highway 99. The ratios for service are 1/200 up to 1/600; 1/400 was splitting the difference. The parking ratio for office without customer service is 1/800 but that was less likely to occur on Highway 99 and it was not considered in determining an average. The 1/400 reflects the mix of service and retail that exists on Highway 99 today. The auto dealers have very unique parking standards; their parking standards are lower but they have a lot of cars parked on their lots. Councilmember Johnson asked whether there was any data to support the parking recommendations. She observed the parking for medical offices was 1 per 200 square feet. She questioned how an average could be determined without knowing what currently exists. Mr. Chave answered the goal was identifying a reasonable average based on the general pattern of development on Highway 99. A detailed study would be an extensive piece of work. Councilmember Johnson said she was not suggesting a detailed study, she wondered whether there was any data to support the proposed change. Mr. Chave answered it was determined by considering the overall mix of uses, general locations, and a general average between the low and high of the mix of uses. Staff also considered data from other cities which are generally less stringent such as 1/500. Staff was reluctant to recommend 1/500 due to the proximity to residential. It was felt the requirement could be reduced slightly if a property only had Highway 99 frontage and there was no opportunity for parking to spill into a residential area. Councilmember Johnson said the difficulty with the information provided was it was not all comparable to Edmonds. For example parking requirements for regional growth centers which do not reflect Highway 99. In the parking requirements for other centers, the only representative one is the Lynnwood Highway 99 Mixed Use Node which required 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet. She was concerned the standard for properties with frontage on Highway 99 was 1 space per 600. Mr. Chave agreed it was a minimum. He Packet Page 17 of 349 acknowledged in considering other cities requirements, there was not a one to one match. Councilmember Johnson summarized she would be more comfortable with more data. Councilmember Bloom asked Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty if he was comfortable the changes would protect the car dealerships. Mr. Doherty answered this was being offered as pilot project to see the response from the development community. The City has a full range of car dealerships, long standing, main car dealerships and some smaller, more marginal car dealerships. The very large profitable car dealerships on Highway 99 are very entrenched in their businesses, have a profitable market niche and the larger ones own their property. There is a huge hurdle for a developer to overcome in a market that not super-hot. In a market that is still struggling to prove itself for residential and mixed use such as the Highway 99 corridor, the margins between development costs and rents are thin. A developer would need property with a very low basis, no leases to buy out, little development on the site, and low construction and site development costs to meet that thin margin. Profitable car dealerships do not fall in that that category. Especially with a one year pilot project, the chances were infinitesimal. There may be a slightly higher likelihood for the smaller dealerships. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members of the public present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Earling closed the public hearing and remanded to Council for action. Main Motion COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF AND THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE FOR FINAL COUNCIL ACTION IN TWO WEEKS REFLECTING THE PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDED CHANGES REGARDING PARKING AND USES. Councilmember Petso asked whether the motion included limiting the ordinance to one year. Mr. Chave advised that was up to the Council; the Planning Board wanted to review what happened in a year. If the Council wished, a sunset date could be established. Amendment 1 COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO INCLUDE A SUNSET DATE OF ONE YEAR. Action on Amendment 1 MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Amendment 2 COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO ELIMINATE THE OPTION TO REDUCE PARKING REQUIREMENTS WITH A PARKING STUDY. Councilmember Petso explained she shared Council President Buckshnis’ concerns that it may be difficult require sufficient documentation to ensure parking will be adequate. As Mr. Chave said one of the means of reducing parking was based on management of the property, she was concern a property owner who cleverly managed his parking could sell and the structure with inadequate parking remain. Councilmember Johnson said in general she would be more comfortable if there was more parking data and information available before a change was made. Action on Amendment 2 UPON ROLL CALL MOTION CARRIED (3-2), COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, JOHNSON AND COUNCILMEMBER PETSO VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS VOTING NO. Packet Page 18 of 349 Amendment 3 COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO LIMIT 100% RESIDENTIAL TO PROPERTIES THAT CAN DEMONSTRATE COMMERCIAL CHALLENGES SUCH AS UNUSUAL PARCEL SHAPE, CHALLENGING TOPOGRAPHY OR A HISTORY OF MINIMUM COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY. Councilmember Petso explained her goal was to attempt to encourage more development activity on Highway 99 but not risk replacing valuable commercial uses that currently exist. If a property is vacant because there is a steep slope in the center or it has an odd shape that will not accommodated a viable business, those properties can be subject to the 100% residential experiment. Mayor Earling asked how that would be defined. Councilmember Petso reiterated unusual parcel shape, challenging topography or a history of minimal commercial activity. Mr. Chave observed that sounded like a policy statement rather than a regulation. Councilmember Petso suggested if the amendment passes, the City Attorney could tighten up the language. Action on Amendment 3 UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-3), COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM AND PETSO VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON AND MESAROS VOTING NO. Amendment 4 COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REQUIRE PROPERTY OPTING FOR 100% RESIDENTIAL BE GOVERNED BY THE RM 1.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM SECONDED. Mr. Chave asked whether that would include lot coverage, setbacks and everything in the RM 1.5 zone. Councilmember Petso responded it may be appropriate to exclude height limits. She explained RM 1.5 is the maximum density multi-family zone which most would consider appropriate for Highway 99. It includes standards to ensure quality residential development such as side setbacks, lot coverage requirements, etc. Mr. Chave suggested specifying which requirements would be included to avoid unintended consequences. For example multi-family zones have very specific density requirements. Councilmember Petso suggested excluding density and height. Councilmember Bloom said it was difficult to make a decision on the amendment without knowing all the RM 1.5 development standards. She asked whether Mr. Chave could provide further information. Mr. Chave agreed he could depending on the outcome of vote. He preferred to identify the standards that would be included such as setbacks. He explained multi-family standards are established for multi-family zones such as low building heights, individual buildings on a site, buffered from residential; they are not set up for mixed use development. Action on Amendment 4 COUNCILMEMBER PETSO WITHDREW HER MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Amendment 5 COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REQUIRE IF 100%RESIDENTIAL IS DEVELOPED ON A SITE, THE PARCEL BE SUBJECT TO THE COVERAGE, SETBACK AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS OF THE RM 1.5 ZONE. Action on Amendment 5 Packet Page 19 of 349 UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-3), COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM AND PETSO VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON AND MESAROS VOTING NO. Amendment 6 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO STRIKE THE SENTENCE IN THE AGENDA MEMO, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS WOULD BE ALLOWED WITH NO SPECIFIC COMMERCIAL SPACE REQUIREMENT. Councilmember Johnson explained she supported removing the second floor commercial space requirement which she felt was consistent with the direction given to the Planning Board at the joint meeting. The Planning Board considered that and added allowing residential development. Mr. Chave summarized Councilmember Johnson preferred the option the Planning Board considered but did not recommend; there is still a commercial requirement on the site but it can be configured so that there was a strictly commercial building and a strictly residential building but the equivalent of one floor of commercial would be somehow configured on the site. Councilmember Johnson agreed. Mr. Chave pointed out that is similar to the provision for 2+ acres. He clarified under the amendment, a residential building could not be constructed on a property without any commercial; there would still be a commercial requirement. Councilmember Johnson explained this would preserve the intent of commercial for the Highway 99 corridor and allow creative options. Mr. Chave relayed Mr. Doherty’s suggestion that with that change, the sunset provision may not be needed. Councilmember Mesaros clarified under this amendment, every site would require some commercial use. Mr. Chave answered yes. Council President Buckshnis did not support the amendment, citing the need for affordable housing and progressive zoning on Highway 99 and that there may not need for commercial development on all properties. The larger properties are required to have a commercial mix, the smaller properties are not. Action on Amendment 6 AMENDMENT CARRIED (3-1-1), COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO AND COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS ABSTAINING. COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO DIVIDE THE QUESTION TO VOTE ON PARKING AND USES SEPARATELY. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (3-2), COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM, PETSO AND JOHNSON VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS VOTING NO. Action on Main Motion as amended to provide direction to Staff and the City Attorney to draft an ordinance for final Council action in two weeks reflecting the Planning Board’s recommended changes regarding parking UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (2-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS AND MESAROS VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM, PETSO AND JOHNSON VOTING NO. Action on Main Motion as amended to provide direction to staff and the City Attorney to draft an ordinance for final Council action in two weeks reflecting the Planning Board’s recommended changes regarding uses MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Chave advised staff will bring back an ordinance for final discussion/action in two weeks. Packet Page 20 of 349 Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 11. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE Senior Planner Kernen Lien Senior Planner Kernen Lien provided an overview of the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) RCW 90.58 • Adopted in 1971 • Policies address: o Shoreline Uses o Environmental Protection o Public Access • Shoreline Master Program The SMP update is to bring the City’s SMP into compliance with Department of Ecology Guidelines – WAC 173-26, the standards for regulation of shoreline uses. The SMP contains a number of elements: • Shoreline Inventory and Characterization • Shoreline restoration plan • Development regulations o Draft ECDC Title 24 o Policies, regulations and standards for shoreline uses and modifications o Administrative provisions • Cumulative impact analysis Mr. Lien described the SMP’s relationship to other plans or regulations: • 24.10.030 – Relationship to Other Plans or Regulations o SMP is adopted element in Edmonds’ Comprehensive Plan o SMP works in tandem with rest of ECDC Uses, developments, and activities must comply with ECDC and SMP SMP prevails where there are conflicts Mr. Lien provided definitions for jurisdiction, setbacks and buffers: • Jurisdiction – Shorelines and 200 feet from ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of shorelines • Setback – Minimum distance between a structure or use and the shoreline OHWM • Buffer – the area adjacent to a critical area and/or shoreline that is required for the continued maintenance, function, and/ or structural stability of the critical area and/or shoreline. The SMP applies to shoreline jurisdictions which include: • All marine waters • Streams and rivers greater than 20 cfs (none in Edmonds) • Lakes 20 acres or larger (Lake Ballinger) • Shorelands – upland areas within 200 feet of the OHWM • Associated wetlands (Edmonds Marsh east of SR-104 and the mouth of Shell Creek) He described shoreline environments identified in the SMP (ECDC 24.30.000 – 24.30.080) • Environment designations are analogous to zoning designations for areas under SMA jurisdiction • 12 proposed shoreline environmental designations: o Aquatic I and II o Natural Environment o Urban Conservancy o Shoreline Residential I, II and III Packet Page 21 of 349 o Urban Mixed Use I, II, III o Urban Mixed Use IV (proposed interim) o Urban Railroad Mr. Lien explained one of biggest changes with the SMP update is related to the Edmonds Marsh. Under the current SMP, the Edmonds Marsh was considered an associated wetland so the shoreline jurisdiction ended at the edge of the marsh. With the SMP update, the Edmonds Marsh was identified as a shoreline of the state which means shoreline jurisdiction extends 200 feet beyond the wetland boundary. The shoreline of the state area was established as the salt influence portion of the marsh. Under the current SMP the marsh was an associated wetland, no shoreline designation was established for the areas on either side of the marsh, Harbor Square and the old Unocal site. The Planning Board’s recommendation was Urban Mixed Use III: • Multi-family residential uses allowed • 50-foot setback (measured from OHWM) The City Council’s discussion included: • No residential allowed • 150-foot setback (measured from OHWM) • 50-foot vegetative buffer Department of Ecology proposed the Urban Mixed Use IV be an interim designation to allow the City and the property owners on both sides of the marsh to work together. He relayed staff’s recommendation regarding Urban Mixed use IV: • 50-foot setback o Consistent with BAS and no net loss criteria o Department of Ecology supports o Opportunities for enhancement • 150-foot setback creates nonconforming situation • Interim designation Mr. Lien explained another important aspect of the SMP update is the CAO integration. He highlighted Part IV: General Policies and Regulations (ECDC 24.40.000 – 24.40.090) • 24.40.020 – Critical Areas • GMA vs. SMA • CAO Integration options 1. Copy specific sections of CAO into SMP 2. Reference a specific AO addition noting which CAO provisions will not apply to the SMP 3. Include portions of the CAO as an appendix to CAO • City pursued options 1 and 2 • 24.40.020.D – CAO exceptions o General provisions o Wetlands At Ecology’s suggestion, the Small Jurisdictions Guidance for Wetlands have been incorporated into the SMP wetlands section replacing the CAO wetland section. • 24.40.020.C – CAO provisions allowed with shoreline variance Mr. Lien provided information regarding wetlands: • Lake Ballinger ringed by wetlands • CAO Buffer (ECDC 23.50.040) o Category III = 50 feet o Category IV = 35 feet Packet Page 22 of 349 • SMP wetland buffers (ECDC 24.40.020.F) o Category III = 60 feet base (+ 45 to 105 feet) o Category IV = 40 feet • Variance required to reduce buffer more than 25% Mr. Lien provided information regarding bluff setbacks: • 50-foot setback plus 15 feet building setback • A shoreline variance would be required to build closer Mr. Lien explained another change in the updated SMP is in Part VIII: Administration – Shoreline Permits (ECDC 24.80.000 – 24.80.170): • Administrative Chapter largely based on WAC 173-27 • 24.80.100 – Public Hearing o Current SMP requires all shoreline permits to be decided by Hearing Examiner o Proposing only significant permits going to Hearing Examiner: One or more persons request a hearing A SEPA Determination of Significance is issued Permit requires shoreline variance or conditional use The project requires a public hearing for other City of Edmonds permits He responded to questions raised by Councilmember Johnson’s at the previous meeting: • Eelgrass, specifically in Brown’s Bay: o Eelgrass distribution discussed in shoreline inventory and characterization, no specific mention of Brown’s Bay o Reviewed most recent data from WDNR Near Shore Habitat Inventory, no specific information regarding Brown’s Bay o Restoration Plan addresses opportunity for restoration throughout Edmonds marine shoreline • Projected Sea Level Rise o UW Climate Impacts Group and the Washington Department of Ecology: Sea Level Rise in the Coastal Waters of Washington State (January 2008) Year Projected Puget Sound Sea Level Rise* 2050 Low 3” Medium 6” High 22” 2100 Low 6” Medium 13” High 50” *Numbers are for advisory purposes, not actual predictions o Sea level rise tied to climate change. Considerations include: Location Time horizon Risk tolerance He identified SMP policies related to sea level rise: • Shoreline Use Goal ECDC 24.20.050.B.10 - Develop adaptive management strategies to increase capacity to respond to future possible impacts on the Edmonds shoreline from climate change in the Puget Sound region. • EDCD24.20.050.C.11- C.13 (new policies recommended by Planning Board) o Stay abreast of scientific information o Prioritize Edmonds Marsh studies o Development should use LID techniques where appropriate Packet Page 23 of 349 He identified regulations in the draft SMP that although they do not specifically mention sea level rise, they imply it be taken into consideration: ECDC 24.40.030 – Flood Hazard Reduction ECDC 24.50.010 – General Modification and Policies Regulations ECDC 24.50.020 – Shoreline stabilization ECDC 24.60.070 - Residential development Mr. Lien reviewed the City’s approval process: • Assemble complete draft SMP • Complete SEPA review and documentation • Provide Growth Management Act 60-day notice of intent to adopt • Hold public hearing • Prepare a responsiveness summary • Approve SMP and submit to Ecology • Demonstrate compliance with Guidelines He reviewed Ecology’s approval process: • Approval process generally takes six months to complete • Process for minor amendment is the same as full blown update • Provide public notice and opportunity for comment • Minimum 30 day comment period • Send comments to local government within 15 days • Local government has 45 days to prepare response to comments o Prepare decision packet 30 days after receiving response to comments o Ecology may: Approve the submitted SMP amendment as is Approve the SMP amendment subject to required changes Deny the SMP amendment • Work with local government to finalize SMP amendment approval Mr. Lien commented due to the Comprehensive Plan code update/reorganization, the code may be organized differently and the SMP may not be in Title 24. Mayor Earling advised the Council will hold a public hearing but not make a decision regarding the specific outcome. Mr. Lien sought guidance with regard to the Urban Mixed Use IV setback. Council President Buckshnis relayed Councilmembers Fraley-Monillas and Peterson did not object to the Council discussion during their absence but felt it best to have the full Council present for a decision. With regard to buildings in Harbor Square becoming nonconforming with a 150-foot setback, she observed 2 of the buildings would be nonconforming with a 50-foot setback including the bubble, a portion of the tennis court and near Blue Collar Dog House. Mr. Lien displayed an image of the 50-foot setback from the edge of the marsh, identifying the shoreline jurisdiction and the 50-foot setback from the march, advising the tennis bubble and the other three buildings at Harbor Square do not appear to be within the 50-foot setback. The tennis court would be but it depends on where the 50-foot setback is measured from. Council President Buckshnis noted the 150-foot setback is standard for most grant programs. Councilmember Bloom observed the Planning Board added development should use LID techniques where appropriate and feasible. She suggested replacing “where appropriate and feasible” with “to the maximum extent feasible.” Mr. Lien responded he did not recall discussion regarding the maximum Packet Page 24 of 349 extend but there was discussion regarding should versus shall versus may. A definition of should was added to the definitions section, the particular action is required unless there is a demonstrated compelling reason based on policies of the Shoreline Management Act and this Master Program against taking the action. The stormwater update will include criteria for appropriate and feasible LID development. “Shall” was not used because LID techniques are not feasible in all areas. The feasibility aspect of LID is spelled out in the stormwater update; adding “to the maximum extent feasible” does not add to the language. Councilmember Petso recalled at one point she wanted to delete the physically separate and functional isolated language and recalled Mr. Lien recommended it be retained. Mr. Lien recalled the discussion regarding physically separate and functional isolated was related to an interim CAO regulation. Councilmember Petso recalled the Council’s preference for Urban Mixed Use IV was no residential. Yet the table on packet page 305 indicates Urban Mixed Use IV contemplates residential. Mr. Lien referred to the Shoreline Development Table: Shoreline Development Permitted by Area Designation, explaining the X under Urban Mixed Use IV for detached residential and attached or stacked residential means it is not a permitted use. The Shoreline Bulk and Dimensional Standards table indicates residential is not allow in Urban Mixed Use IV. Councilmember Johnson asked when the last OHWM was done, when the flooding study will be done and when it will be measured after Willow Creek is daylighted. Mr. Lien explained the OHWM for Puget the Sound shoreline along Edmonds is the average higher high tide which in this area is 10 feet above mean sea level elevation. The OHWM for Edmonds Marsh is the wetland boundary. To be a wetland, a site must meet three criteria, 1) predominantly wetland vegetation, 2) wetland hydrology saturated for 12.5% of the growing season, and 3) have hydric soils. While the overall boundaries of the marsh are not likely to change, the boundary is set by the historic fill. Daylighting and sea level rise could change the makeup of the marsh. He displayed a 2008 aerial image of the marsh from a survey done by WSDOT during planning for Edmonds Crossing and the salt marsh boundary. He identified the 10-foot elevation mark; if Willow Creek is daylighted and more free flow is allowed between Puget Sound, the marsh boundaries will not change but the marsh makeup will change. Councilmember Johnson concluded from that explanation that the artificial dikes around Harbor Square are not likely to be affected by the OHWM. Mr. Lien agreed that boundary would not change. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO EXTEND THE MEETING FOR 30 MINUTES. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Barbara Tipton, Edmonds, commented the Edmonds Marsh is a 24 acre remnant of barrier estuary, a uniquely rich Puget Sound habitat that is an ecological asset to the community. Less than 20% of tidal wetlands of Puget Sound remain intact. Improving the function of estuaries like the Edmonds Marsh is an essential step to Puget Sound recovery. Since the founding of Edmonds, the marsh has lost over 50% of its original size. Reestablishment of proper hydrology in the remaining remnant would improve stormwater management, help the community adapt to sea rise, and establishing a more direct connection between the marsh and Puget Sound through Willow Creek would allow juvenile salmonid and spawning Coho to access the marsh. The marsh is of interest to many entities including the City of Edmonds, the Port of Edmonds, Native American Tribes and local citizen groups. The purpose of buffers is to protect aquatic ecosystems such as the Edmonds Marsh from the negative impacts of industrial, commercial and residential land uses. Buffers are transitional areas and should be populated by native vegetation. A recent study by the Economic Development Commission recommended the City continue to improve annual festivals. While at Bird Fest, she met people from Colorado and New England; restoration of the marsh represents a unique opportunity for creating a wildlife recreation area that attracts people to the City. Packet Page 25 of 349 Jim Orvis, Port of Edmonds Commission President, commented the process has been long and complicated, and the Port appreciates the efforts of staff, the Council, Ecology and the public to create a shoreline plan that represents the best interests of the Edmonds community. The Port has serious concern with the proposed expansion of setbacks from the Edmonds Marsh to 150 feet. The current 25-foot buffer at Harbor Square have worked well for over 30 years, demonstrating that structures and activities at Harbor Square are compatible with a function marsh. Establishing setbacks of 150 feet will have a serious, adverse effect on Harbor Square, drawing the setback line into existing structures and regulating them to nonconforming use. This will severely impact the Port’s and Harbor Square tenants’ ability to upgrade existing building as well as eliminate the opportunity for creative redevelopment, ensuring the buildings within the 150 setback remain as they are indefinitely. A 150 setback means these buildings cannot be modified to be more compatible with the marsh. Both DOE and staff have stated the existing buffer meets the no net loss criteria specified in the shoreline regulations. There is no scientific basis to support the expanded setback. Council action to expand existing buffers by imposing a 150-foot setback is an arbitrary taking of property rights for two reasons, 1) it is not supported by the required scientific evidence, and 2) it will not have the desired effect of improving the marsh. The action establishing a 150- foot setback is proposed as an interim solution to permit the parties to discuss a final solution. In the Port’s opinion, those discussions have been held and the Port views the proposed interim solution as simply a mean to avoid making a decision. He requested the Council reconsider this important issue and served notice if the revised SMP is approve as presented with a 150-foot setback, the Port Commission will, in the interest of its constituents, appeal directly to the Department of Ecology and the Shoreline Hearings Board. Evan Zhao, Students Saving Salmon Club, Edmonds-Woodway High School, commented growing up he passed the Edmonds Marsh many times but did not know its function, thinking it was bare land waiting for development. After joining this club, he recognized the marsh’s true importance. Theodore Roosevelt was a strong advocate of conservation and preservation of the nation’s resources. He had the foresight to set aside 800,000 acres to create the Grand Canyon National Park and 600,000 acres to create Olympic National Parking. This is an opportunity to follow Roosevelt’s example and create the City’s own gem. There is grant funding available to restore the functions of the marsh, making it a center for natural life in Edmonds, a breeding ground for salmon and to purify water runoff. He asked the Council to realize the potential of the marsh and hoped it will one day become a gem of the City. Patrick Madvlka, Edmonds-Woodway High School Student, explained restoration of the Edmonds Marsh represents a large step to make Edmonds more environmental friendly and efficiently coexist with nature. His generation is cognizant of environmental issues and will facilitate change in the future for the good of the environment. He suggested starting now to make Edmonds a pristine example of environmental progress, starting with the restoration of the marsh. Val Stewart. Edmonds, speaking as an individual and not as a Planning Board Member, commented the interim Urban Mixed Use IV shoreline designation allows two years to work out details regarding buffers, setbacks and allowed uses on property adjacent to and including the marsh. After the SMA was passed in 1971, a high school teacher in the community, John Cook, took 30 students into the marsh to do a field study where they found evidence of saltwater influence. The students ultimately testified at a Snohomish County hearing that resulted in saving the marsh from fill. Now that a portion of the marsh has been reclassified as a shoreline, it will be subject to stricter standards of the SMP. This bodes well for the future of salmon populations and upstream where spawning occurs. Salmon are important to the health of the ecosystem. No net loss is not good enough. Before the marsh was diked and filled, it was a rare habitat and the remaining remnant is even rarer. Since the early 1900 approximately 90% of backshore tidal marshes in Puget Sound have been filled for agriculture and development. The City is at a crossroads; allowing more time to explore the possibilities for salmon recovery with available grant money through collaborative work the Tribes, government agencies and nonprofits. She relayed the words Packet Page 26 of 349 of the late Billy Frank Jr., a tribal elder and a long time champion of tribal rights, salmon recovery and the environment. Dave Page, Edmonds, commented he came by his environmental concerns firsthand as a sportsman, diver and swimmer and was aware and concerned about preserving the environment. This morning he and his wife caught four silver salmon in Edmonds. In two weeks, silver salmon will be seen butting their heads on the seawall, trying to return to the stream where they were born but they cannot because the hatchery is behind the marsh. He was excited to learn about efforts to save the marsh, daylight Willow Creek and allow the salmon to incubate in the marsh. A 150-foot setback would make the marsh eligible for millions in grant funds for recovery. However, as a protector of private property rights, the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution states if life, liberty or property is taken for public use, it has to be paid for; this is a clear taking. He suggested an interim 150-foot buffer for a couple years. If he was a Port Commission, he would advocate for a lawsuit against the City if the 150-foot setback was approved. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the public hearing and remand to Council for comments. Councilmember Petso suggested deleting physically separate and functionally isolated provision, Item G on page 291 of the Council packet. Council President Buckshnis, a member of WRIA 8, believed cleaning up the marsh would improve the surrounding property values. She agreed with an interim solution, noting there are millions available in salmon recovery grants. A 100-150 foot setback is standard. Councilmember Johnson announced Val Stewart has arranged a tour of the Edmonds Marsh on October 4 from 10:30 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. for the Mayor, City Council Planning Board, the Climate Protection Committee and the Edmonds-Woodway High School Students for Salmon. 12. REPORT ON CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE MEETINGS OF SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting. 13. MAYOR'S COMMENTS With regard to Westgate, Mayor Earling commented there has been a mischaracterization that staff is the reason the Westgate Plan is what is which he said is not true. It has also been characterized as the Mayor’s plan which is also not true. There have been several comments from the public saying the Westgate Plan feels rushed. He understood those comments, recognizing people often come late to a process. In fact the Westgate Plan is not rushed; it has been worked on for 4-5 years. It has been before the City Council, a group of UW students who helped shape some of the recommendations, the Economic Development Commission, the Planning Board and now it is back to the City Council. There has been a thorough vetting of the plan including Councilmember Bloom’s Town Hall meeting yesterday. Sometimes in the heat of changes, people jump to assumptions. This plan has been underway at several levels for a number of years. Mayor Earling referred to today’s press release regarding a $1.67 million bill from Fire District 1 as a result of union negotiations over the last few years. The City knew FD1 would retroactively bill the City for 2013 and 2014, but the size of the bill was a surprise. Mountlake Terrace. Brier and Edmonds were taken aback that no preview of the amount was provided. The contract agreement with FD1 was approved in November 2009, under a different Council and administration. He has asked FD1 for full accounting and is working with FD1 and City Attorney to ensure all the costs they are billing are justified. FD1 Chief Ed Widdis will provide further information regarding the process and the amount at the October 14 study Packet Page 27 of 349 session. Further information with also be provided with his 2015 budget message at the October 7 Council meeting. 14. COUNCIL COMMENTS With regard to the Westgate Plan, Councilmember Petso commented one reason for the perception that it is being rushed is the current version of the plan was presented to the Council on August 4, was promptly modified and further modifications are in the works. She agreed the process has been going on a long time but the current plan has not. She suggested beginning work on the current plan. Councilmember Petso announced the Edmonds Historical Society’s Heritage Day fundraiser on Friday, October 24, an event that finances many of the Historical Society’s activities. Tickets are available at a reduced price until October 1. Tickets can be purchased by visiting the Museum or their website, HistoricEdmonds.org, or calling 425- 774-0900. Councilmember Mesaros reported last Friday he attended the SeaShore Transportation Forum, an organization that discusses transportation issues in north King County and south Snohomish Count. One of the presentations was on the impact of potential coal trains. The individual has been invited to make a presentation to the Edmonds City Council. Councilmember Bloom reported on the Town Hall meeting she held last night. She thanked Theresa Wippel and Larry Vogel for filming and making it available on My Edmonds News. She also thanked Councilmember Petso for attending and helping her organize and Senior Council Executive Assistant Jana Spellman who organized the materials. The Town Hall was very, very well attended. She echoed Councilmember Petso’s comment that although the process has been underway, a majority of the people at the Town Hall said this was the first time they heard about it and many were concern about key issues in the plan related to parking, traffic patterns, impacts to shopping, etc. She found a Town Hall meeting was a format conductive to conversation unlike study sessions or joint meetings. A variety of concerns that she and the public had with the plan were discussed as well as how the plan could be modified to address the concerns. Councilmember Bloom requested the City Council hold a Town Hall meeting together before the October 7 public hearing. She commented a public hearing where each person is allowed three minutes and there is no discussion is very different; a Town Hall meeting allows discussion. She requested Council President Buckshnis work with her to organize a Town Hall meeting in advance of the public hearing that could be publicly noticed to allow discussion and to hear the public’s concerns. Council President Buckshnis objected to being put on the spot. She commented September 23 is a study session which is very similar to a Town Hall meeting. Protocols for a Town Hall meeting would need to be determined. She offered to take Councilmember Bloom’s request under advisement. Councilmember Johnson announced all City Councilmembers are invited to attend Snohomish County Tomorrow’s annual meeting on Wednesday, September 24. Mayor Earling, Council President Buckshnis and she plan to attend. Council President Buckshnis advised the September 23 study session will be a mock beginning to the Council’s twice a month study sessions and will include discussion regarding Westgate. The public is welcome to provide comment. A public hearing regarding Westgate is scheduled on October 7. She advised Keely O’Connell is assisting Ms. Stewart with the October 4 tour of the marsh. 15. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) Packet Page 28 of 349 This item was not needed. 16. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 17. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:28 p.m. Packet Page 29 of 349 AM-7141 4. B. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:09/23/2014 Time:Consent Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Lori Palmer Department:Finance Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #210337 through #210346 dated September 4, 2014 for $26,625.76, claim check #210347 dated September 5, 2014 and claim checks #210348 through #210517 dated September 11, 2014 total $2,423,039.38. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #61167 through #61178 for $467,673.17 and #61188 for $750.01, benefit checks #61179 through #61187 for $91,649.44 and wire payments for $312,987.24 for the period of August 16, 2014 through August 31, 2014. Recommendation Approval of claim and payroll checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Attachments Claim cks 09-04-14 Claim cks 09-11-14 Payroll ck 61188 Payroll Benefits 09-05-14 Payroll Summary 09-05-14 Project Numbers 09-11-14 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Scott James 09/11/2014 11:20 AM City Clerk Scott Passey 09/11/2014 11:24 AM Mayor Dave Earling 09/11/2014 11:26 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 09/11/2014 11:27 AM Form Started By: Lori Palmer Started On: 09/11/2014 08:17 AM Packet Page 30 of 349 Final Approval Date: 09/17/2014 Packet Page 31 of 349 09/04/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 3:06:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210337 9/4/2014 074991 BALL, GINA 8/29/14 REFUND 8/29/14 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 8/29/14 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 001.000.239.200 500.00 Total :500.00 210338 9/4/2014 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 18454 YOGA 18454 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 18454 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 131.64 18457 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE18457 YOGA 18457 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 81.90 18460 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE18460 YOGA 18460 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 351.00 18463 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE18463 YOGA 18463 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 324.00 18466 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE18466 YOGA 18466 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 540.00 18469 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE18469 YOGA 18469 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 345.60 18491 PILATES YOGA FUSION INSTRUCTOR FEE18491 PILATES YOGA F 18491 PILATES YOGA FUSION INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 337.05 Total :2,111.19 210339 9/4/2014 073922 GAVIOLA, NIKKA 18327 TAEKWON-DO 18327 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTOR FEE 18327 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 120.00 Total :120.00 210340 9/4/2014 072147 GEIL, ANNE 8/4/14 YOGA INSTRUCT 8/4/14 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 8/4/14 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 1Page: Packet Page 32 of 349 09/04/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 3:06:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210340 9/4/2014 (Continued)072147 GEIL, ANNE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 42.07 Total :42.07 210341 9/4/2014 073924 KEARNS, JESSIKA CHRISTINE 18429 TAEKWON-DO 18429 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTOR FEE 18429 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 70.50 18433 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTOR FEE18433 TAEKWON-DO 18433 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 171.50 Total :242.00 210342 9/4/2014 074992 MEYER, MICHELLE 8/29/14 REFUND 8/29/14 REFUND UNUSED MONITOR TIME 8/29/14 REFUND UNUSED MONITOR TIME 001.000.239.200 7.50 Total :7.50 210343 9/4/2014 070003 PAXTON, LAUREL 18320 ACTING CAMP 18320 ACTING CAMP INSTRUCTOR FEE 18320 ACTING CAMP INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 3,228.00 Total :3,228.00 210344 9/4/2014 071911 PROTZ, MARGARET 18496 FELDENKRAIS 18496 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTOR FEE 18496 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 194.00 18499 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTOR FEE18499 FELDENKRAIS 18499 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 283.50 Total :477.50 210345 9/4/2014 072319 SUNSET BAY RESORT LLC 18377 BEACH CAMP 18377 BEACH CAMP INSTRUCTOR FEE 18377 BEACH CAMP INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 13,222.50 18399 BEACH CAMP INSTRUCTOR FEE18399 BEACH CAMP 18399 BEACH CAMP INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 6,300.00 2Page: Packet Page 33 of 349 09/04/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 3:06:55PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :19,522.502103459/4/2014 072319 072319 SUNSET BAY RESORT LLC 210346 9/4/2014 073621 TANIMURA, NAOAKI 18546 KENDO 18546 KENDO INSTRUCTOR FEE 18546 KENDO INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 75.00 18548 KENDO INSTRUCTOR FEE18548 KENDO 18548 KENDO INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 300.00 Total :375.00 Bank total :26,625.7610 Vouchers for bank code :usbank 26,625.76Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report10 3Page: Packet Page 34 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210347 9/5/2014 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC August-2014 08-14 LEGAL FEES 08-14 Legal Fees 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 32,000.00 Total :32,000.00 210348 9/11/2014 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 338114 MEADOWDALE CC RODENT SERVICE MEADOWDALE CC RODENT SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 75.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 7.12 Total :82.12 210349 9/11/2014 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 814321 SUMMER SOFTBALL SHIRTS SUMMER SOFTBALL SHIRTS - SOFTBALL CHAMPS 001.000.64.575.52.31.00 93.35 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.575.52.31.00 8.87 Total :102.22 210350 9/11/2014 065737 ADI TH8P4201 Library - Parts Library - Parts 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 23.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.28 Total :26.26 210351 9/11/2014 066054 ADIX'S BED & BATH FOR DOGS AND SEPT 2014 ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 9/2014 EDMONDS AC ANIMAL BOARDING FOR 9/2014 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 2,127.08 Total :2,127.08 210352 9/11/2014 065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE 0814-1376 HUMMINGBIRD PARK TREE TRIMMING HUMMINGBIRD PARK TREE TRIMMING 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 600.00 9.5% Sales Tax 1Page: Packet Page 35 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210352 9/11/2014 (Continued)065413 ALPINE TREE SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 57.00 SIERRA PARK HAULING, CLEANING0814-1377 SIERRA PARK HAULING, CLEANING 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 450.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 42.75 MAIN STREET TREE TRIMMING0814-1378 MAIN STREET TREE TRIMMING 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 250.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 23.75 YOST PARK HAULING, CLEANING0814-1379 YOST PARK HAULING, CLEANING 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 575.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 54.63 MAPLEWOOD PARK TREE TRIMMING0814-1380 MAPLEWOOD PARK TREE TRIMMING 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 750.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 71.25 Total :2,874.38 210353 9/11/2014 001528 AM TEST INC 82254 WWTP - MERCURY TEST sludge metals testing 423.000.76.535.80.41.31 75.00 Total :75.00 210354 9/11/2014 074695 AMERICAN MESSAGING W41010460I Water Watch Pager Water Watch Pager 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 4.46 Total :4.46 210355 9/11/2014 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC YU99 WWTP - MONTHLY NPDES monthly NPDES testing 2Page: Packet Page 36 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210355 9/11/2014 (Continued)064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC 423.000.76.535.80.41.31 165.00 WWTP - MONTHLY NPDESYV82 monthly NPDES testing 423.000.76.535.80.41.31 165.00 Total :330.00 210356 9/11/2014 001634 AQUA QUIP 855324-1 YOST POOL SUPPLIES YOST SUPPLIES: LIQUID CHLORINE AND DPD 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 173.56 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 16.50 Total :190.06 210357 9/11/2014 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1987591654 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 34.47 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 3.27 WWTP - UNIFORMS, TOWELS, & MATS1987603024 wwtp uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 2.48 wwtp mats & towels 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 65.28 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 6.44 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1987603025 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 88.48 Total :200.42 210358 9/11/2014 074506 ATLAS SALES & RENTALS INC 93233-0007 COOLING SYSTEM RENTAL - SERVER ROOM CITY Cooling system rental - 5th week 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 160.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 15.20 3Page: Packet Page 37 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :175.202103589/11/2014 074506 074506 ATLAS SALES & RENTALS INC 210359 9/11/2014 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 75810 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #800 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 115.23 UB Outsourcing area #800 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 115.23 UB Outsourcing area #800 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 118.72 UB Outsourcing area #800 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 421.37 UB Outsourcing area #800 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 421.36 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 10.95 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.95 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 11.27 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS75888 UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 90.46 UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 93.21 UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 330.22 UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 330.22 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 8.59 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 8.59 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 8.86 UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing 4Page: Packet Page 38 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210359 9/11/2014 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 90.46 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS76021 UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 124.20 UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 124.20 UB Outsourcing area #400 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 127.96 UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 453.24 UB Outsourcing area #400 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 453.24 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 11.80 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 11.80 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 12.15 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS76113 UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 88.74 UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 88.74 UB Outsourcing area #200 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 91.44 UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 322.57 UB Outsourcing area #200 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 322.56 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 8.43 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 8.43 9.5% Sales Tax 5Page: Packet Page 39 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210359 9/11/2014 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 8.69 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS76181 UB Outsourcing area #700 printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 23.10 UB Outsourcing area #700 printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 23.10 UB Outsourcing area #700 printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 23.79 UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 106.32 UB Outsourcing area #700 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 106.32 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 2.20 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 2.20 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 2.25 Total :4,733.16 210360 9/11/2014 069076 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS INC COE0814 Employee background checks Employee background checks 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 165.00 Total :165.00 210361 9/11/2014 074571 BALLARD KAYAK EXPEDITIONS 19056 BEYOND THE BEA 19056 BEYOND THE BEACHES KAYAK TOUR 19056 BEYOND THE BEACHES KAYAK TOUR 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 233.80 Total :233.80 210362 9/11/2014 071658 BANNICK, PAUL BIRDFEST_2 BIRDFEST TWO LECTURES Bird Fest 2 photography lectures 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 500.00 Total :500.00 6Page: Packet Page 40 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210363 9/11/2014 002170 BARTON, RONALD 8/27/2014 LEOFF 1 Medical reiumbursement LEOFF 1 Medical reiumbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 747.43 Total :747.43 210364 9/11/2014 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 9027 SWEDISH INSPECTION THRU AUGUST 2014 Swedish Inspection thru August 2014 001.000.67.532.20.41.00 1,601.50 E1GA/E3GA/E4JA.SERVICES THRU AUGUST 20149028 E1GA.Services thru August 2014 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 562.00 E3GA.Services thru August 2014 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 10,215.00 E4JA,Services thru August 2014 421.000.74.594.34.41.10 12,813.75 Total :25,192.25 210365 9/11/2014 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 67269 INV#67269 - EDMONDS PD - FALK BALLISTIC VEST-LEVEL III 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 800.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 76.00 Total :876.00 210366 9/11/2014 074849 BOMAR, RICK 82114 REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO PROBATION TRAINING REFUND FOR TRAVEL TO PROBATION TRAINING 001.000.23.523.30.43.00 8.28 Total :8.28 210367 9/11/2014 074994 BRINKLEY, SARAH 2922 A Mileage Fac Maint - Work Mileage for Supplies - Fac Maint - Work Mileage for Supplies - 001.000.66.518.30.43.00 14.50 Fac Maint Mileage for Work Supplies2922 B Mileage Fac Maint Mileage for Work Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.43.00 12.71 Total :27.21 7Page: Packet Page 41 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210368 9/11/2014 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 14081372 FLEET COPIER Fleet Copier 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 33.02 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 3.14 PW ADMIN COPIER14081373 PW Office Copier for Aug 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 68.55 PW Office Copier for Aug 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 38.85 PW Office Copier for Aug 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 38.85 PW Office Copier for Aug 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 27.42 PW Office Copier for Aug 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 27.42 PW Office Copier for Aug 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 27.41 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 6.51 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 3.69 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 3.69 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 2.61 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 2.61 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 2.59 WATER SEWER COPIER14081374 Water Sewer Copier 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 70.68 Water Sewer Copier 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 70.68 8Page: Packet Page 42 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210368 9/11/2014 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 6.72 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 6.71 WWTP - COPIER CHARGES14096404 wwtp - copier rental 423.000.76.535.80.45.41 85.80 CANON CONTRACT CHARGES14097354 Canon contract charges C5051 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 83.35 Canon contract charges C5051 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 83.35 Canon contract charges C5051 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 83.29 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 7.92 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 7.92 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 7.91 Total :800.69 210369 9/11/2014 074442 CAPITAL ONE 8941 PW Departments - Dish and Laundry Soaps PW Departments - Dish and Laundry Soaps 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 26.15 PW Departments - Dish and Laundry Soaps 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 26.15 PW Departments - Dish and Laundry Soaps 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 26.15 PW Departments - Dish and Laundry Soaps 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 26.14 Library - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 178.91 Fac Maint - Supplies 9Page: Packet Page 43 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210369 9/11/2014 (Continued)074442 CAPITAL ONE 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 101.18 Total :384.68 210370 9/11/2014 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC NZ19429 PROLINE/TRIPP PROLINE 1000BSX SFP F/CISCO 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 212.24 TRIPP 1M FIBER 62.5/125 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 32.20 TRIPP LITE 1M MM 50 FIB CAB 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 194.90 Freight 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 34.01 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 44.97 HP PROLIANT SERVERPB68182 Server 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 3,900.00 Server Kit 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 260.00 Hard Drive 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 1,600.00 HP Enterprise Hard Drive 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 530.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 597.55 FIBER CABLEPC11730 Fiber Cable 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 129.68 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 12.32 HARDWARE SUPPORTPC53154 5YR Hardware Support 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 1,150.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.49.00 109.29 10Page: Packet Page 44 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :8,807.562103709/11/2014 069813 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 210371 9/11/2014 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY EV199377 WWTP - REPAIR/REPLACE MAINTENANCE wwtp - maintenance project 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 142.69 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 13.56 HELIUM TANK RENTAL GYMNASTICSRN08141002 HELIUM TANK RENTAL GYMNASTICS 001.000.64.575.55.45.00 12.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.575.55.45.00 1.16 WWTP - CYLINDER RENTALRN08141003 cylinder rental 423.000.76.535.80.48.11 61.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.11 5.80 Total :236.46 210372 9/11/2014 064291 CENTURY LINK 206-Z02-0478 WWTP TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE WWTP TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 138.73 Total :138.73 210373 9/11/2014 065682 CHS ENGINEERS LLC 451202-1405 E3GA.SERVICES THRU MAY 2014 E3GA.Services thru May 2014 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 299.25 Total :299.25 210374 9/11/2014 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 10975 WWTP - SEPTEMBER 2014 TREATMENT September 2014 treatment 423.000.75.535.80.47.20 27,602.00 Total :27,602.00 210375 9/11/2014 022200 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 2708 EDMONDS SHARE OF FALL CRAZE POSTAGE EDMONDS SHARE OF FALL CRAZE POSTAGE 001.000.64.571.22.42.00 7,279.04 11Page: Packet Page 45 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :7,279.042103759/11/2014 022200 022200 CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE 210376 9/11/2014 065700 CITY OF TUKWILA MB-01600 INV#MB-01600 - EDMONDS PD CLASS VSWAT FOR T. AKSDAL 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 500.00 Total :500.00 210377 9/11/2014 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2677171-1 Fac Maint - Towels Fac Maint - Towels 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 67.62 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6.42 Fac Maint - Sealer, TT, TowelsW2695828 Fac Maint - Sealer, TT, Towels 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 496.70 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 47.19 Total :617.93 210378 9/11/2014 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC Sep-14 C/A CITYOFED00001 Seo -14 Fiber Optics Internet Conneciton 001.000.31.518.87.42.00 406.00 Total :406.00 210379 9/11/2014 069892 COLUMBIA FORD INC 3-F216 2014 Ford Police Interceptor Utility AWD 2014 Ford Police Interceptor Utility AWD 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 31,520.00 8.3% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 2,632.76 EQ93PO - Wiring Conduit3-F216a EQ93PO - Wiring Conduit 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 155.00 8.3% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 12.87 Total :34,320.63 210380 9/11/2014 074680 COMBINED CONSTRUCTION INC E3DA.Ret Release E3DA.RETAINAGE RELEASE 12Page: Packet Page 46 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210380 9/11/2014 (Continued)074680 COMBINED CONSTRUCTION INC E3DA.Retainage Release 112.200.223.400 5,635.00 Total :5,635.00 210381 9/11/2014 070323 COMCAST 8498 31 030 0721433 CEMETERY BUNDLED SERVICE CEMETERY BUNDLED SERVICE 130.000.64.536.20.42.00 119.96 Total :119.96 210382 9/11/2014 047450 CONSOLIDATED TECH SERVICES 2014080061 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES Scan Services for August 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 940.00 Total :940.00 210383 9/11/2014 072848 COPIERS NW INV1087257 INV1087257 HMH636 - EDMONDS PD IRC5045 LEASE 08/05 TO 09/04/14 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 226.77 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 21.54 INV1087258 HMH636 - EDMONDS PDINV1087258 B/W METER CHARGE IRC5045 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 29.32 COLOR METER CHARGE IRC5045 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 69.51 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 9.39 Total :356.53 210384 9/11/2014 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING AUG 2014 DRY CLEANING JULY/AUG - EDMONDS PD CLEANING/LAUNDRY JULY/AUG 2014 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 743.28 Total :743.28 210385 9/11/2014 070673 CROSS MATCH TECHNOLOGIES INC 257662 POLICE DEPT SOFTWARE Police Dept Software 13Page: Packet Page 47 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210385 9/11/2014 (Continued)070673 CROSS MATCH TECHNOLOGIES INC 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 4,100.00 Freight 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 25.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 391.88 Total :4,516.88 210386 9/11/2014 072700 CURVATURE LLC quote00315316a CATALYST, CONNECTOR AND CORDS Cisco Redundant Power System 2300 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 275.00 Catalyst 2960 s Flexstack 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 1,485.00 2960 S 48 GigE Poe 370W 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 7,395.00 Catalyst 3750 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 450.00 Spare RPS 2300 Cable 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 270.00 GE SFP, LC Connector SX 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 150.00 Freight 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 238.81 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 975.08 TRANSCEIVERS AND CABLESquote00315316b LC Connector SX Transceiver 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 75.00 GE SFP LC Connector LX/LH 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 375.00 LC/ST Duplex Cable 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 80.00 1m LC/ST Duplex 62.5/125 Cable 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 24.00 Freight 14Page: Packet Page 48 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210386 9/11/2014 (Continued)072700 CURVATURE LLC 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 47.26 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.87.35.00 57.13 TECHNICAL SUPPORTQUOTE00315316C Technical Support 001.000.31.518.87.49.00 2,145.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.87.49.00 203.78 Total :14,246.06 210387 9/11/2014 069529 D & G BACKHOE INC E3JA.Pmt 7 Final E3JA.PMT 7 (FINAL) THRU 08/08/14 E3JA.Pmt 7 (FINAL) thru 8/8/14 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 20,865.22 E3JA.Ret 7 421.000.223.400 -952.75 Total :19,912.47 210388 9/11/2014 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 347742 E1CA.SERVICES THRU 8/16/14 E1CA.Services thru 8/16/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 484.60 E1CA.Services thru 8/16/14 112.200.68.595.20.61.00 1,882.80 Total :2,367.40 210389 9/11/2014 070230 DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING 08-05-14 to 09-03-14 STATE SHARE OF CONCEALED PISTOLS State share of Concealed Pistol 001.000.237.190 441.00 Total :441.00 210390 9/11/2014 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2014 CERT RENEWAL WWTP - CERTIFICATON RENEWAL Roderick Sebers - 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 200.00 Robert Slenker 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 200.00 Daniel Garcia 15Page: Packet Page 49 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210390 9/11/2014 (Continued)006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 200.00 Curt Zuvela 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 200.00 Jon Clay 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 200.00 Total :1,000.00 210391 9/11/2014 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 2015-BA0024058 WWTP - INCINERATION PERMIT Annual Biosolids Incineration Fee 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 880.46 Total :880.46 210392 9/11/2014 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 14-3476 MINUTE TAKING 08/26/14 City Council Minutes and 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 326.70 09/02/14 City Council Minutes and 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 333.30 Total :660.00 210393 9/11/2014 074554 DOMINGUEZ, EDWARD BIRDFEST_7 BIRDFEST PSBD PRESENTATION Bird Fest PSBF Presentation 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 50.00 Total :50.00 210394 9/11/2014 068591 DOUBLEDAY, MICHAEL 08312014 STATE LOBBYIST AUGUST 2014 State lobbyist for August 2014 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 2,600.00 Total :2,600.00 210395 9/11/2014 007253 DUNN LUMBER 2718730 GrandStand - Wood Supplies GrandStand - Wood Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 288.62 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 27.42 Grandstands - Wood Supplies2721566 16Page: Packet Page 50 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210395 9/11/2014 (Continued)007253 DUNN LUMBER Grandstands - Wood Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 207.22 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 19.69 Grand Stands - Supplies2724732 Grand Stands - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 510.46 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 48.49 Total :1,101.90 210396 9/11/2014 007253 DUNN LUMBER 2732008 Grand Stands - Supplies Grand Stands - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 60.64 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.76 Total :66.40 210397 9/11/2014 065892 EAF FOUNDATION TOURISM PROMO TOURISM PROMO TOURISM PROMO 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 800.00 Total :800.00 210398 9/11/2014 069605 EAGLE EYE CONSULTING ENGINEERS 2014-EDM-JUL Plan Review for Jacob's Marina Plan Review for Jacob's Marina 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 340.00 Total :340.00 210399 9/11/2014 070884 EARTHWORK ENTERPRISES INC E4JA.Pmt 1 E4JA.PMT 1 THRU 8/29/14 E4JA.Pmt 1 thru 8/29/14 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 178,830.56 Total :178,830.56 210400 9/11/2014 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 39658 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES 10W30 SAE QT 17Page: Packet Page 51 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210400 9/11/2014 (Continued)007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 46.44 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.41 Total :50.85 210401 9/11/2014 007775 EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 935 AUGUST CHAMBER LUNCHEON August Chamber of Commerce Luncheon 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 20.00 Total :20.00 210402 9/11/2014 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 19166 ANDRADE-ODUBER 19166 ANDRADE-ODUBER YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 19166 ANDRADE-ODUBER YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP 122.000.64.571.20.49.00 61.00 Total :61.00 210403 9/11/2014 008410 EDMONDS PRINTING CO R24613 Green Business Window Cling Green Business Window Cling 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 293.46 Total :293.46 210404 9/11/2014 038500 EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER 2014-09-01 09/14 RECREATION SERVICES CONTRACT FEE 09/14 Recreation Services Contract Fee 001.000.39.555.00.41.00 5,000.00 Total :5,000.00 210405 9/11/2014 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 2-26950 LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTREAM LN / MET LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTREAM LN / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 70.53 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 722-29118 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 34.65 Total :105.18 210406 9/11/2014 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP 128524 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT AGREEMENT Radix Monthly Maint Agreement - 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 152.00 18Page: Packet Page 52 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :152.002104069/11/2014 031060 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP 210407 9/11/2014 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 104020 1 P&R C1030 COPIER CHARGES P&R C1030 COPIER CHARGES 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 11.07 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 1.05 COPIER CHARGES C5051104056 Copier charges for C5051 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 0.93 Copier charges for C5051 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 0.93 Copier charges for C5051 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 0.92 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 0.09 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 0.09 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 0.08 Total :15.16 210408 9/11/2014 070118 ELECTRONIC DATA SOLUTIONS 15810 Water - Cable for GPS Antenna Water - Cable for GPS Antenna 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 63.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 5.99 Total :68.99 210409 9/11/2014 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH583560 McCoy/PLN20140028 legal ads. McCoy/PLN20140028 legal ads. 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 77.40 Legal Description EDH5854415~EDH584415 Legal Description EDH5854415~ 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 51.60 Schumacher Bldg/PLN20130047 legal ads.EDH585093 19Page: Packet Page 53 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210409 9/11/2014 (Continued)009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD Schumacher Bldg/PLN20130047 legal ads. 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 68.80 Rivelle/PLN20140032 legal ads.EDH585344 Rivelle/PLN20140032 legal ads. 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 56.76 CITY NOTICES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGEDH585824 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE 001.000.25.514.30.44.00 34.40 CITY NOTICES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGEDH585836 Legal Lot Definition PUBLIC HEARING 001.000.25.514.30.44.00 44.72 CITY NOTICES FOR PUBLIC HEARINGEDH585839 ECDC Amend CG Zone Public Hearing 001.000.25.514.30.44.00 63.64 Total :397.32 210410 9/11/2014 009895 FELDMAN, JAMES A 83114 PUBLIC DEFENDER PUBLIC DEFENDER 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 20,000.00 Total :20,000.00 210411 9/11/2014 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 3067568 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES: TUBE, TEE, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 84.96 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 8.07 Total :93.03 210412 9/11/2014 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0434370 WWTP - REPAIR & MAINTENANCE o-ring gasket 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 9.04 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 0.86 WWTP - REPAIR & MAINTENANCE3062751 2X1-1/2 pvc 20Page: Packet Page 54 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210412 9/11/2014 (Continued)009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 15.63 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 1.48 Total :27.01 210413 9/11/2014 070271 FIRST STATES INVESTORS 5200 048611 PARKING REVENUE Parking revenue 001.000.39.519.90.45.00 300.00 Total :300.00 210414 9/11/2014 070855 FLEX PLAN SERVICES INC 10002800 Flex plan monthly fee Flex plan monthly fee 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 75.00 Total :75.00 210415 9/11/2014 011900 FRONTIER 253-007-4989 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETRY CIRCUIT 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 29.02 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES253-012-9166 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 151.72 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 281.76 WWTP AUTO DIALER - 1 VOICE GRADE253-012-9189 WWTP AUTO DIALER - 1 VOICE GRADE 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 41.08 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 18.53 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 34.42 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE253-017-4360 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 43.86 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 21Page: Packet Page 55 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210415 9/11/2014 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 81.46 WWTP TELEMETRY - 8 VOICEGRADE SPECIAL253-017-7256 WWTP TELEMETRY - 8 VOICEGRADE SPECIAL 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 217.18 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE LINE425-712-8347 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE LINE 250 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 62.84 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL425-745-5055 MEADOWDALE PRESCHOOL 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 80.74 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FAX LINES425-771-0158 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FAX LINES 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 124.79 WWTP AUTO DIALER - 1 BUSINESS LINE425-771-5553 WWTP AUTO DIALER - 1 BUSINESS LINE 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 106.62 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER ALARM LINE425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIRE AND 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 126.64 425-776-5316425-776-5316 425-776-5316 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 60.28 Total :1,460.94 210416 9/11/2014 074572 GA PUBLICATIONS NW LLC 1797 ECA 2015 FULL PAGE AD Full page ad in the ECA 2015 program 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 958.00 Total :958.00 210417 9/11/2014 069675 GALAXY AD PROMOTIONS 1215 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 36.31 Total :36.31 210418 9/11/2014 074988 GD MACKAY CO LTD GM2014029 WWTP - SMALL EQUIPMENT 22Page: Packet Page 56 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210418 9/11/2014 (Continued)074988 GD MACKAY CO LTD 56" offset mast head & stainless steel 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 5,955.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 320.00 Total :6,275.00 210419 9/11/2014 072001 GOOD EYE DESIGN 201421 BROCHURE DESIGN CHT BROCHURE DESIGN CHT 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 760.00 Total :760.00 210420 9/11/2014 012199 GRAINGER 9519017017 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES DIRECT COUPLED DAMPER ACTUATOR 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 139.65 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 13.27 Total :152.92 210421 9/11/2014 072900 GUTTMAN, BURTON C BIRDFEST_6 BIRDFEST GETTING STARTED IN BIRDING Bird Fest "Getting Started in Birding" 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 75.00 Total :75.00 210422 9/11/2014 074998 HANDY ANDY RENT-A-TOOL, INC 104904 PARKS TOOL RENTAL GSK 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 133.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.64 Total :145.64 210423 9/11/2014 074804 HARLES, JANINE 197303 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES AUGUST 2014 Photography services for month 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 200.00 Total :200.00 210424 9/11/2014 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 5090701 WWTP - MAINTENANCE/REPAIR 23Page: Packet Page 57 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210424 9/11/2014 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES silicone & fitting 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 8.90 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 0.85 Total :9.75 210425 9/11/2014 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2503916 Yellow Ink Cartridge for Diane. Yellow Ink Cartridge for Diane. 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 -29.40 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 -2.79 Misc. office supplies including2504772 Misc. office supplies including 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 547.31 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 51.99 Misc. office supplies including2508766 Misc. office supplies including 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 252.08 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 23.96 Total :843.15 210426 9/11/2014 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 629799 WWTP - PLANT CHEMICALS hypochlorite solution 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 2,605.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 247.51 Total :2,852.91 210427 9/11/2014 015279 JONES, JEFFREY WLEEA FUEL EXPENSE CLAIM - JONES - WLEEA FUEL COST REIMBURSE FUEL PURCHASED FOR EXPLORER 001.000.41.521.22.43.00 104.02 Total :104.02 24Page: Packet Page 58 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210428 9/11/2014 072650 KCDA PURCHASING COOPERATIVE 3828101 INV#3828101 ACCT#100828 - EDMONDS PD 10 CASES MULTI USE COPY PAPER 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 237.30 HANDLING FEE 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 55.20 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 22.54 Total :315.04 210429 9/11/2014 062477 KEEP POSTED 18147 WOTS DISTRIBUTION WOTS DISTRIBUTION 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 143.00 Total :143.00 210430 9/11/2014 071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER 18273 KIDZ LOVE SOCC 18273 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 18273 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 695.40 18274 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE18274 KIDZ LOVE SOCC 18274 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 732.00 18275 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE18275 KIDZ LOVE SOCC 18275 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 402.60 18276 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE18276 KIDZ LOVE SOCC 18276 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 366.00 18277 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE18277 KIDZ LOVE SOCC 18277 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 219.60 Total :2,415.60 210431 9/11/2014 072304 KOTIS DESIGN 453048 PARKS MAINT - T SHIRTS PARKS MAINT - T SHIRTS 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 520.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 49.39 25Page: Packet Page 59 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :569.392104319/11/2014 072304 072304 KOTIS DESIGN 210432 9/11/2014 068024 KRUCKEBERG BOTANIC GARD FOUND 19055 KRUCKEBERG BOT 19055 KRUCKEBERG BOTANIC GARDEN INSTRUCT 19055 KRUCKEBERG BOTANIC GARDEN 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 45.50 BIRDFEST REGISTRATIONBIRDFEST_9 Bird Fest registration % 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 52.00 Total :97.50 210433 9/11/2014 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 4062 LAMBERT.POWER TAPE Lambert.Power Tape 001.000.67.532.20.49.00 33.40 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.67.532.20.49.00 3.17 Total :36.57 210434 9/11/2014 017050 KWICK'N KLEEN CAR WASH 09082014-01 INV#09082014-01 - EDMONDS PD 24 CAR WASHES $5.03 (INC TX) 8/14 001.000.41.521.22.48.00 120.72 Total :120.72 210435 9/11/2014 066522 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC 3251730MB Water - EZ Street Asphalt 12 tons Water - EZ Street Asphalt 12 tons 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1,224.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 116.28 Total :1,340.28 210436 9/11/2014 072059 LEE, NICOLE 1331 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 142.56 Total :142.56 210437 9/11/2014 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC September-2014 09-14 LEGAL FEES September 2014 Legal Fees 001.000.36.515.31.41.00 32,000.00 26Page: Packet Page 60 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :32,000.002104379/11/2014 073603 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC 210438 9/11/2014 067631 LODESTAR COMPANY INC 138706 WWTP - SERVICE FACILITIES HVAC Service 423.000.76.535.80.41.23 554.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.23 52.63 WWTP - SERVICE FACILITIES138724 HVAC Service 423.000.76.535.80.41.23 488.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.23 46.36 Total :1,140.99 210439 9/11/2014 074848 LONG BAY ENTERPRISES INC 2012-208 STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN CONSULTANT AUG 201 SAP implementation consultant 001.000.61.557.20.41.00 6,090.00 Total :6,090.00 210440 9/11/2014 072992 LYNNWOOD ICE CENTER 18415 LEARN TO ICE S 18415 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE 18415 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 178.50 18418 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE18418 LEARN TO ICE S 18418 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 178.50 Total :357.00 210441 9/11/2014 019305 MACAULAY AND ASSOC LTD 14-160 APPRAISAL REVIEW CIVIC FIELD PROPERTY APPRAISAL REVIEW CIVIC FIELD PROPERTY 126.000.39.594.75.61.00 1,500.00 Total :1,500.00 210442 9/11/2014 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 572260-00 Grand Stand - Compressor Grand Stand - Compressor 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 259.00 Grand Stand - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.98 27Page: Packet Page 61 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210442 9/11/2014 (Continued)019582 MANOR HARDWARE 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 24.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.76 Total :292.34 210443 9/11/2014 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 1384 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 88.32 INTERPRETER FEE1385 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 88.32 Total :176.64 210444 9/11/2014 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 99100453 WWTP - REPAIR & MAINTENANCE low pressure flange 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 41.84 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 8.13 WWTP - REPAIR & MAINTENANCE99823381 anchors and epoxy 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 242.38 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 8.70 WWTP - MECHANICAL SUPPLIES99861928 drill bit for concrete with embedded 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 78.22 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 6.61 Total :385.88 210445 9/11/2014 075000 MECHE, JOE BIRDFEST_3 BIRDFEST DIGISCOPING Bird Fest Digiscoping Presentation 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 100.00 28Page: Packet Page 62 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :100.002104459/11/2014 075000 075000 MECHE, JOE 210446 9/11/2014 063773 MICROFLEX 00022004 ANNUAL ONLINE SERVICE FEE annual online service fee 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 1,200.00 Total :1,200.00 210447 9/11/2014 072263 MID PAC CONSTRUCTION 1410 REPAIRS TO YOST TENNIS COURT SURFACING REPAIRS TO YOST TENNIS COURT SURFACING 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 6,200.00 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 589.00 RESURFACE YOST TENNIS COURTS1411 RESURFACE YOST TENNIS COURTS 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 9,100.00 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 864.50 SURFACING EIGHT SETS OF PICKLE BALL LINE1412 SURFACING EIGHT SETS OF PICKLE BALL 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 2,000.00 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 190.00 TENNIS CT & PICKLE BALL STRIPING SEAVIEW1414 TENNIS CT & PICKLE BALL STRIPING 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 2,100.00 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.48.00 199.50 Total :21,243.00 210448 9/11/2014 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 196421 WWTP - PROPANE propane for forklift 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 30.89 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 2.93 Total :33.82 29Page: Packet Page 63 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210449 9/11/2014 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 13-1517-7 E4JA.SERVICES THRU 7/31/14 E4JA.Services thru 7/31/14 421.000.74.594.34.41.10 1,137.26 Total :1,137.26 210450 9/11/2014 024600 NEUERT, L L 8/27/14 LEOFF 1 Medical reiumbursement LEOFF 1 Medical reiumbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 2,112.05 Total :2,112.05 210451 9/11/2014 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY s6007253.001 WWTP - FLOWSTATION micrologix 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 787.50 9.5% Sales Tax 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 74.81 WWTP - FLOWSTATIONs6012066.001 micrologix 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 359.41 Freight 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 9.25 9.5% Sales Tax 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 35.02 Total :1,265.99 210452 9/11/2014 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 54690 WWTP - CHEMICALS, BISULFITE 440 units of Sodium Bisulfite 38% 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 1,944.80 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 184.76 Total :2,129.56 210453 9/11/2014 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 1-100012 WILLOW CREEK HONEY BUCKET WILLOW CREEK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 115.65 HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET1-1003068 HICKMAN PARK HONEY BUCKET 30Page: Packet Page 64 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210453 9/11/2014 (Continued)061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 591.18 YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET1-1003080 YOST PARK POOL HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 310.99 86TH AVE W & MAIN ST HONEY BUCKET CM1-1005227 86TH AVE W & MAIN ST HONEY BUCKET CM 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 -89.32 HUMMINGBIRD PARK HONEY BUCKET2-1006840 HUMMINGBIRD PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 206.58 Total :1,135.08 210454 9/11/2014 075003 NORTHWEST MECHANICAL BLD20140888 Address not in the City limits. Address not in the City limits. 001.000.257.620 105.00 Total :105.00 210455 9/11/2014 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 502 Planning Board Minutetaker 8/27/14 Planning Board Minutetaker 8/27/14 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 231.00 Total :231.00 210456 9/11/2014 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 120048 Water - Blue File Folders Water - Blue File Folders 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 58.41 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 5.56 PW Admin Supplies121935 PW Admin Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 29.94 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 2.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES203038 Office Supplies 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 79.30 31Page: Packet Page 65 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210456 9/11/2014 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 7.53 INV#299350 ACCT 520437 250POL EDMONDS PD299350 9X12 KRAFT ENVELOPES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 52.93 10X13 KRAFT ENVELOPES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 37.28 BUBBLE WRAP FOR MAILING CD'S 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 20.64 HP TONER CE278A (MCCLURE) 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 63.54 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 16.57 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES300830 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES: PRINTER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 342.76 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 32.55 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES300918 BINDERS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 22.76 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.16 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES307714 PENCIL SHARPENER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 26.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.56 SUPPLIES895086 SUPPLIES 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 44.46 Total :848.79 210457 9/11/2014 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER August 2014 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL Emergency Medical Services & Trauma 32Page: Packet Page 66 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210457 9/11/2014 (Continued)070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER 001.000.237.120 1,154.68 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 24,933.24 Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 148.50 State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 96.95 Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.237.180 4,093.85 School Zone Safety Account 001.000.237.200 11.63 Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 2,238.85 Traumatic Brain Injury 001.000.237.260 421.82 Accessible Communities Acct 001.000.237.290 31.65 Multi-Model Transportation 001.000.237.300 31.69 Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 153.88 Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis 001.000.237.170 55.40 WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 550.22 Total :33,922.36 210458 9/11/2014 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0000130 220TH ST SW 7 84TH AVE W WATER 220TH ST SW 7 84TH AVE W WATER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 15.89 CEMETERY WATER0001520 CEMETERY WATER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 39.77 CEMETERY SPRINKLER0001530 33Page: Packet Page 67 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210458 9/11/2014 (Continued)026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT CEMETERY SPRINKLER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 189.70 5TH & ST RTE WATER0002930 5TH & ST RTE WATER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 19.84 SIDEWALK NEAR 10415 226TH PL WATER0026390 SIDEWALK NEAR 10415 226TH PL WATER 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 17.48 Total :282.68 210459 9/11/2014 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 11231 YOST SUPPLIES YOST SUPPLIES: ACID MAGIC, SODIUM 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 684.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 65.03 YOST SUPPLIES11335 YOST SUPPLIES: ACID MAGIC 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 287.85 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 27.35 YOST SUPPLIES11370 YOST SUPPLIES: INJECTOR CHECK VALVE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 128.48 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.20 Total :1,205.41 210460 9/11/2014 074632 OVIVO USA LLC 8463889 WWTP - SUPPLIES ball check valves 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 3,809.70 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 361.92 Total :4,171.62 210461 9/11/2014 064070 PALMATIER, LISA HMP CONCERTS HMP CONCERTS 34Page: Packet Page 68 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210461 9/11/2014 (Continued)064070 PALMATIER, LISA HMP CONCERTS 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 1,000.00 PARK CONCERT COORDINATORPARK CONCERTS PARK CONCERT COORDINATOR 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 336.00 Total :1,336.00 210462 9/11/2014 065051 PARAMETRIX INC 18-81931 E1FD.SERVICES THRU 8/2/14 E1FD.Services thru 8/2/14 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 628.06 Total :628.06 210463 9/11/2014 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.4159-7 Sr Center - Paint Supplies Sr Center - Paint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 258.13 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 24.52 Sr Center - Paint Supplies4178-7 Sr Center - Paint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 127.02 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12.07 PS - Paint Supplies4241-3 PS - Paint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 29.04 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.76 Total :453.54 210464 9/11/2014 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 104799 INV#104799 - EDMONDS PD TOW 2003 MERCEDES #454XGA 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 158.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 15.01 INV#104889 - EDMONDS PD104889 35Page: Packet Page 69 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210464 9/11/2014 (Continued)070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC TOW 2005 HYUNDAI #AKE7945 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 158.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 15.01 Total :346.02 210465 9/11/2014 069633 PET PROS EPD-010 INV#EPD-010 - EDMONDS PD - K 9 OFFICERS NU NU HI ENDURANCE 30# 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 604.08 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.26.31.00 57.99 Total :662.07 210466 9/11/2014 071983 PICKLEBALL STUFF LLC 17694 PARKS & REC SUPPLIES JUGS BULLDOG POLYBALL, WHITE, 3 DOZ 001.000.64.575.52.31.00 41.10 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.575.52.31.00 3.90 Total :45.00 210467 9/11/2014 028400 PITNEY BOWES INC 419606 A/C 1537-2982-88.2 Maintenance contract letter opener 001.000.31.514.23.48.00 376.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.48.00 35.72 Total :411.72 210468 9/11/2014 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC E967200 Fac Maint - Supplies Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 146.48 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.92 FS 16 - Fan Speed ControlE972370 FS 16 - Fan Speed Control 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 23.86 36Page: Packet Page 70 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210468 9/11/2014 (Continued)028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 16.59 Fac Maint - Glo Stix Kit for Cables 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 54.40 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.85 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 5.16 Total :264.26 210469 9/11/2014 064088 PROTECTION ONE 2010551 ALARM MONITORING MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE ALARM MONITORING CLUBHOUSE 6801 N 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 112.47 Total :112.47 210470 9/11/2014 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200002411383 YOST POOL YOST POOL 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,770.82 Total :1,770.82 210471 9/11/2014 030695 PUMPTECH INC 0084790-IN Lift St 7 - Pump Lift St 7 - Pump 423.000.75.535.80.64.00 13,485.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.64.00 1,281.08 Total :14,766.08 210472 9/11/2014 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 93389 INV#93389 - EDMONDS PD TOW 2013 DODGE #SH01293 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 158.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 15.01 Total :173.01 210473 9/11/2014 071702 RAILROAD MGMT CO III LLC 310319 Lic #305683 Edmonds Storm Drain Crossing 37Page: Packet Page 71 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210473 9/11/2014 (Continued)071702 RAILROAD MGMT CO III LLC Lic #305683 Edmonds Storm Drain Crossing 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 146.16 Lic #305684 - Meadowdale Storm Drain310320 Lic #305684 - Meadowdale Storm Drain 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 146.16 Lic # 305754 Meadowdale Storm Drain310339 Lic # 305754 Meadowdale Storm Drain 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 146.16 Total :438.48 210474 9/11/2014 074509 RENCH, CHRIS 5 CORNERS INLAYS 5 CORNERS INLAYS 5 CORNERS INLAYS 117.200.64.575.50.41.00 2,400.00 Total :2,400.00 210475 9/11/2014 006841 RICOH USA INC 5032103824 Additional Images - Reception copier Additional Images - Reception copier 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 7.04 Total :7.04 210476 9/11/2014 070042 RICOH USA INC 93122282 Renewal for billing period 8/26-9/25/14 Renewal for billing period 8/26-9/25/14 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 30.66 Total :30.66 210477 9/11/2014 075001 RUTH, MARIA BIRDFEST_4 BIRDFEST MARBLED MURRELETS Bird Fest Marbled Murrelets Presentation 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 100.00 Total :100.00 210478 9/11/2014 074256 RYDIN DECAL 298832 RYDIN DECAL Employee Parking Permits 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 678.30 Freight 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 24.45 38Page: Packet Page 72 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210478 9/11/2014 (Continued)074256 RYDIN DECAL 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 2.32 Total :705.07 210479 9/11/2014 074507 SARAH CHO 4Z079024 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 200.00 Total :200.00 210480 9/11/2014 071660 SARVEY AUDUBON SOCIETY BIRDFEST_5 BIRDFEST RAPTOR EDUCATION Bird Fest Raptor Education 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 100.00 Total :100.00 210481 9/11/2014 065708 SCCIT 12625 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES FROM 10/14 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES FROM 10/14 001.000.65.518.20.49.00 350.00 Total :350.00 210482 9/11/2014 074911 SEATTLE HEALTHY POOLS 265 ERIC CPO TRAINING BIRD CERTIFIED POOL OPERATOR COURSE-ERIC BIRD 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 325.00 POOL MATH WORKBOOK 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 29.35 YOST POOL SERVICE268 YOST POOL SERVICE, CHLORINE FEED ISSUE 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 490.00 Total :844.35 210483 9/11/2014 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 14-3264 Sewer - Overhall Kit Sewer - Overhall Kit 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 180.55 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 17.16 Total :197.71 39Page: Packet Page 73 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210484 9/11/2014 074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 24186 14108-SUPPORT 14108-Support 001.000.31.518.88.41.00 4,702.50 Total :4,702.50 210485 9/11/2014 067686 SITELINES PARK & PLAYGROUND PD 15592 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES SWING CLEVIS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 145.20 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 13.79 Total :158.99 210486 9/11/2014 036955 SKY NURSERY T-0387782 PARKS MAINT FLOWER PROGRAM 4TH & MAIN PR PARKS MAINT FLOWER PROGRAM 4TH & MAIN 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 56.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 5.32 Total :61.32 210487 9/11/2014 065803 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 18265 SKYHAWKS SUMME 18265 SKYHAWKS SUMMER SPORTS CAMP INSTRU 18265 SKYHAWKS SUMMER SPORTS CAMP 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 73.12 Total :73.12 210488 9/11/2014 074651 SNO CO CLERKS OFFICE E7AC.Country Farms E7AC.COUNTRY FARMS STIPULATED ORDER FOR E7AC.Country Farms Stipulated Order for 112.200.68.595.20.61.00 14,600.00 Total :14,600.00 210489 9/11/2014 037303 SNO CO FIRE DIST # 1 Q4-2014 Q4-2014 FIRE SERVICES CONTRACT PAYMENT Q4-2014 Fire Services Contract Payment 001.000.39.522.20.51.00 1,555,694.75 Total :1,555,694.75 210490 9/11/2014 037303 SNO CO FIRE DIST # 1 18562 FIRST AID/CPR 18562 FIRST AID/CPR INSTRUCTOR FEE 18562 FIRST AID/CPR INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 500.00 40Page: Packet Page 74 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :500.002104909/11/2014 037303 037303 SNO CO FIRE DIST # 1 210491 9/11/2014 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0254-7 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95TH AVE W / PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95TH AVE W / 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 32.33 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W / METER 12003-4823-3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 73.21 ANWAY PARK2006-6395-3 ANWAY PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 215.60 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTREAM LN / ME2008-6520-2 LIFT STATION #3 1529 NORTHSTREAM LN / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 110.78 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS WAY / METER2009-4334-8 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS WAY / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 68.92 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH2010-5432-7 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 90.16 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W / METER 12011-9222-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 38.81 LIFT STATION 7403 BALLINGER WAY / METER2014-2731-7 LIFT STATION 7403 BALLINGER WAY / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 31.27 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W / METER 12015-8215-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 45.85 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W / METER 12016-1195-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 54.48 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW / METER 12017-5147-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 94.29 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW / METER 12019-0786-2 41Page: Packet Page 75 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210491 9/11/2014 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW / METER 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 54.31 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W / METE2020-7719-4 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 980.85 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER 10002020-8787-0 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 181.48 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH2021-3965-5 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 48.75 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / METER 100042022-8912-0 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 106.77 WWTP ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICE / NOT MET2025-7952-0 WWTP ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICE / NOT 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 8.70 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGATION & SUMP2026-2041-5 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK IRRIGATION & SUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 32.33 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW (FS #16)2028-0763-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW (FIRE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 32.83 Total :2,301.72 210492 9/11/2014 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2014-2191 INV#2014-2191 - EDMONDS PD 11 WORK RELEASE @ $44.77 - 7/14 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 492.47 58.67 BOOKINGS @$95.94 - 07/14 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 5,628.80 455 HOUSING DAYS @$66.63 - 07/14 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 30,316.65 Total :36,437.92 210493 9/11/2014 065910 SNOCOM 911 COMMUNICATIONS 14-902-2 Q4-14 COMMUNICATIONS 42Page: Packet Page 76 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210493 9/11/2014 (Continued)065910 SNOCOM 911 COMMUNICATIONS Q4-14 COMMUNICATIONS 001.000.39.528.00.51.00 192,701.80 Q4-14 COMMUNICATIONS 421.000.74.534.80.51.00 5,071.10 Q4-14 COMMUNICATIONS 423.000.75.535.80.51.00 5,071.10 Q4-14 NEW WORLD ASSESSMENT14-902-2A Q4-14 New World Assessment 001.000.39.528.00.51.00 19,816.75 Total :222,660.75 210494 9/11/2014 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER Aug 2014 CRIME VICTIMS COURT REMITTANCE Crime Victims Court Remittance 001.000.237.140 683.17 Total :683.17 210495 9/11/2014 038100 SNO-KING STAMP 55823 Rubber stamps for DSD Rubber stamps for DSD 001.000.62.524.20.31.00 269.69 Total :269.69 210496 9/11/2014 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103584 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / RECYCLING WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / RECYCLING 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 29.95 PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND RECYCLING103587 PARKS MAINT GARBAGE AND RECYCLING 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 762.78 Total :792.73 210497 9/11/2014 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4238309-01 Fac Maint - Bib Overalls - L LaFave Fac Maint - Bib Overalls - L LaFave 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 37.10 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.52 Total :40.62 43Page: Packet Page 77 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210498 9/11/2014 068439 SPECIALTY DOOR SERVICE 38800 FS 17 - Prev Maint FS 17 - Prev Maint 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 350.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 33.25 Total :383.25 210499 9/11/2014 009400 STELLAR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 3414021 Water / Sewer - Rags Water / Sewer - Rags 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 70.44 Water / Sewer - Rags 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 70.44 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 6.69 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.69 Total :154.26 210500 9/11/2014 074797 SUPER CHARGE MARKETING LLC 1088 SOCIAL MEDIA FOR MONTH OF AUGUST Social media services for month of 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 400.00 Total :400.00 210501 9/11/2014 074921 TERRA FIRMA CONSULTING 3 Tree Ordinance Tree Ordinance 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 6,475.00 Total :6,475.00 210502 9/11/2014 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 388363 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES KIT REPAIR FOR 5874 VALVE HAWS PLUS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 282.96 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 26.89 Total :309.85 210503 9/11/2014 075002 TOMASEVIC, JORGE BIRDFEST_8 BIRDFEST PSBD PRESENTATION 2 44Page: Packet Page 78 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210503 9/11/2014 (Continued)075002 TOMASEVIC, JORGE Bird Fest PSBF Presentation #2 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 50.00 Total :50.00 210504 9/11/2014 070275 TONY ANGELL INC BIRDFEST_1 BIRDFEST KEYNOTE SPEAKER Bird Fest 2014 keynote speaker 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.00 Total :600.00 210505 9/11/2014 041960 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC 49010 PARKS MAINT REPAIR OF CHAIN LINK FENCING PARKS MAINT REPAIR OF CHAIN LINK 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 364.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 34.58 Total :398.58 210506 9/11/2014 074494 UK SOCCER ELITE 18280 UK ELITE SOCCE 18280 UK ELITE SOCCER CAMP INSTRUCTOR FE 18280 UK ELITE SOCCER CAMP INSTRUCTOR 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 4,608.00 Total :4,608.00 210507 9/11/2014 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 429285 Sewer - Manhole Nets Sewer - Manhole Nets 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 215.60 Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 21.32 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 22.51 Total :259.43 210508 9/11/2014 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9730823608 C/A 571242650-0001 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bld Dept 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 165.13 iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk 001.000.25.514.30.42.00 55.99 45Page: Packet Page 79 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210508 9/11/2014 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS iPad Cell Service Council 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 58.20 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 290.11 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Development 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 131.07 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Econ 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 95.10 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering 001.000.67.532.20.42.00 408.15 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 110.18 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 95.10 iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 95.10 iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 311.26 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor's Office 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 40.01 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Dept 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 55.09 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Police Dept 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 920.87 Air cards Police Dept 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 840.51 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 45.88 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 13.10 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 45.88 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 13.10 46Page: Packet Page 80 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210508 9/11/2014 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 13.11 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Street Dept 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 210.83 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Fleet 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 55.10 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/Sewer 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 70.99 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Water/Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 70.98 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer Dept 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 205.14 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 245.15 iPad Cell Service Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 120.03 iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 164.12 IPhone/Planning 001.000.62.558.60.42.00 40.01 C/A 77540262-000019730947241 Lift Station access 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 90.54 Total :5,075.83 210509 9/11/2014 074231 VPCI 34297 LASERFICHE SOFTWARE ASSURANCE PLAN Laserfiche Software Assurance Plan and 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 6,128.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 494.29 Total :6,622.29 210510 9/11/2014 047200 WA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 09/08/2014 BUSINESS INSTITUTE RANKINS, HITE BUSINESS INSTITUTE RANKINS, HITE 001.000.64.571.21.49.00 220.00 47Page: Packet Page 81 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 48 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :220.002105109/11/2014 047200 047200 WA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 210511 9/11/2014 067086 WASHINGTON CRANE AND HOIST CO 0023077-IN WWTP - PROFESSIONAL SERVICE on-site wire rope replacement 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 820.43 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 77.94 Total :898.37 210512 9/11/2014 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL I15001539 INV#I15001539 EDM301 - EDMONDS PD BACKGROUND CHECKS - AUG 2014 001.000.237.100 214.50 Total :214.50 210513 9/11/2014 073758 WASHINGTON TRACTOR INC 68580 Water/Sewer - Mower Repairs Water/Sewer - Mower Repairs 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 214.63 Water/Sewer - Mower Repairs 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 214.63 Env Fees 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 7.17 Env Fees 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 7.16 9.0% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 19.52 9.0% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 19.51 Total :482.62 210514 9/11/2014 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 06-9748 WILLOW CREEK PARK TREE MAINT WILLOW CREEK PARK TREE MAINT 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 620.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 58.90 MAPLEWOOD PARK TREE MAINT06-9749 MAPLEWOOD PARK TREE MAINT 48Page: Packet Page 82 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 49 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210514 9/11/2014 (Continued)067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 430.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 40.85 704 FIR ST TREE MAINT06-9750 704 FIR ST TREE MAINT 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 450.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 42.75 Total :1,642.50 210515 9/11/2014 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 6412 ASTRO BRITE PAPER WAU AstroBrite Paper 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 52.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 4.99 Total :57.49 210516 9/11/2014 064213 WSSUA TREASURER 204 FINAL SUMMER LEAGUE GAMES UMPS FINAL SUMMER LEAGUE GAMES UMPS 001.000.64.575.52.41.00 759.00 Total :759.00 210517 9/11/2014 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC Aug-14 Retainer AUG 2014 RETAINER Monthly Retainer 001.000.36.515.33.41.00 13,657.80 Total :13,657.80 Bank total : 2,455,039.38171 Vouchers for bank code :usbank 2,455,039.38Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report171 49Page: Packet Page 83 of 349 09/11/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 50 8:00:17AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 50Page: Packet Page 84 of 349 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 716 (09/10/2014 to 09/10/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description REGULAR HOURSREGULAR HOURS190 1.00 0.01 Total Net Pay:$750.01 $0.01 1.00 09/11/2014 Page 1 of 1 Packet Page 85 of 349 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 672 - 08/16/2014 to 08/31/2014 Bank: usbank - US Bank Direct Deposit Check Amt Name Payee # Date Check # 61179 09/05/2014 mebt AST TTEE 82,807.23 0.00 61180 09/05/2014 epoa EPOA-1 POLICE 1,150.00 0.00 61181 09/05/2014 epoa4 EPOA-4 POLICE SUPPORT 117.00 0.00 61182 09/05/2014 flex FLEX-PLAN SERVICES, INC 710.76 0.00 61183 09/05/2014 jhan JOHN HANCOCK 894.86 0.00 61184 09/05/2014 cope SEIU COPE 102.00 0.00 61185 09/05/2014 seiu SEIU LOCAL 925 3,467.78 0.00 61186 09/05/2014 uw UNITED WAY OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY 514.00 0.00 61187 09/05/2014 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 1,885.81 0.00 91,649.44 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Direct Deposit Check Amt Name Payee # Date Check # 2116 09/05/2014 pens DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 187,236.55 0.00 2117 09/05/2014 aflac AFLAC 5,345.58 0.00 2122 09/05/2014 us US BANK 92,006.42 0.00 2123 09/05/2014 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 20,058.00 0.00 2124 09/05/2014 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,143.60 0.00 2125 09/05/2014 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 1,098.50 0.00 2126 09/05/2014 uhc UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE CO 2,098.59 0.00 312,987.24 0.00 404,636.68 0.00Grand Totals: Page 1 of 19/11/2014 Packet Page 86 of 349 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 672 (08/16/2014 to 08/31/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description Educational Pay CorrectionREGULAR HOURS-ed2 0.00 -71.28 NO PAY LEAVEABSENT111 33.00 0.00 SICK LEAVE - L & ISICK120 83.50 2,615.13 SICK LEAVESICK121 443.25 15,138.98 VACATIONVACATION122 1,842.50 72,406.24 HOLIDAY HOURSHOLIDAY123 22.00 989.88 FLOATER HOLIDAYHOLIDAY124 53.00 1,676.07 COMPENSATORY TIMECOMP HOURS125 226.00 8,199.86 Police Sick Leave L & ISICK129 5.00 234.30 Holiday Compensation UsedCOMP HOURS130 13.00 439.64 BEREAVEMENTBEREAVEMENT141 84.00 2,643.05 Kelly Day UsedREGULAR HOURS150 156.00 5,579.98 COMPTIME BUY BACKCOMP HOURS152 1.00 20.04 COMPTIME AUTO PAYCOMP HOURS155 95.78 4,095.28 SICK LEAVE PAYOFFSICK157 3.00 59.16 VACATION PAYOFFVACATION158 23.25 458.47 MANAGEMENT LEAVEVACATION160 32.00 2,499.07 COUNCIL BASE PAYREGULAR HOURS170 700.00 7,000.00 COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAYREGULAR HOURS174 0.00 200.00 COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICALREGULAR HOURS175 0.00 694.93 REGULAR HOURSREGULAR HOURS190 14,767.25 517,201.71 FIRE PENSION PAYMENTSREGULAR HOURS191 4.00 2,267.58 OVERTIME-STRAIGHTOVERTIME HOURS210 12.00 363.82 WATER WATCH STANDBYOVERTIME HOURS215 48.00 2,342.26 STANDBY TREATMENT PLANTMISCELLANEOUS216 16.00 1,401.20 OVERTIME 1.5OVERTIME HOURS220 180.50 8,823.05 OVERTIME-DOUBLEOVERTIME HOURS225 14.50 894.38 WORKING OUT OF CLASSMISCELLANEOUS410 93.44 195.65 SHIFT DIFFERENTIALSHIFT DIFFERENTIAL411 0.00 815.56 RETROACTIVE PAYRETROACTIVE PAY600 0.00 4,710.40 ACCRUED COMPCOMP HOURS602 85.00 0.00 ACCRUED COMP TIMECOMP HOURS604 138.00 0.00 ACCREDITATION PAYMISCELLANEOUSacc 0.00 23.56 Accreditation 1% Part TimeMISCELLANEOUSacp 0.00 0.00 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 3 Packet Page 87 of 349 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 672 (08/16/2014 to 08/31/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORTMISCELLANEOUSacs 0.00 161.90 BOC II CertificationMISCELLANEOUSboc 0.00 81.17 Repayment AgreementREGULAR HOURScell 0.00 -60.96 Collision ReconstructionistMISCELLANEOUScolre 0.00 135.29 TRAINING CORPORALMISCELLANEOUScpl 0.00 140.18 CERTIFICATION III PAYMISCELLANEOUScrt 0.00 512.32 DETECTIVE PAYMISCELLANEOUSdet 0.00 195.60 Detective 4%MISCELLANEOUSdet4 0.00 942.14 EDUCATION PAY 2%EDUCATION PAYed1 0.00 826.41 EDUCATION PAY 4%EDUCATION PAYed2 0.00 700.90 EDUCATION PAY 6%EDUCATION PAYed3 0.00 4,360.95 FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAIDABSENTfmla 37.60 0.00 FAMILY MEDICAL/SICKSICKfmls 82.40 2,640.40 HOLIDAYHOLIDAYhol 27.00 2,194.76 K-9 PAYMISCELLANEOUSk9 0.00 198.25 LONGEVITY PAY 2%LONGEVITYlg1 0.00 1,816.55 LONGEVITY PAY 4%LONGEVITY PAYlg2 0.00 1,006.31 LONGEVITY 6%LONGEVITY PAYlg3 0.00 5,168.73 Longevity 1%LONGEVITYlg4 0.00 331.43 Longevity 3%LONGEVITYlg5 0.00 66.98 Longevity .5%LONGEVITYlg6 0.00 323.80 Longevity 1.5%LONGEVITYlg7 0.00 698.53 MOTORCYCLE PAYMISCELLANEOUSmtc 0.00 195.60 5% OUT OF CLASSMISCELLANEOUSooc 0.00 107.65 Public Disclosure SpecialistMISCELLANEOUSpds 0.00 44.66 PHYSICAL FITNESS PAYMISCELLANEOUSphy 0.00 1,496.13 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SERGEANMISCELLANEOUSprof 0.00 149.96 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5%MISCELLANEOUSsdp 0.00 494.56 ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANTMISCELLANEOUSsgt 0.00 149.96 TRAFFICMISCELLANEOUStraf 0.00 210.27 VACATION ADD BACKVACATIONvab 2.00 0.00 09/05/2014 Page 2 of 3 Packet Page 88 of 349 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 672 (08/16/2014 to 08/31/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description Total Net Pay:$467,673.17 $689,208.40 19,323.97 09/05/2014 Page 3 of 3 Packet Page 89 of 349 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STR E0AA c329 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade STM E0FC c326 Stormwater GIS Support WTR E0IA c324 AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements WTR E0JA c363 2010 Waterline Replacement Program FAC E0LA c327 Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project FAC E0LB c332 Senior Center Roof Repairs STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1AB c343 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements General E1EA c372 SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM E1FD c339 Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades STM E1FF c341 Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects STM E1FH c349 Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement SWR E1GA c347 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement WTR E1GB c370 Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update WTR E1JA c333 2011 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JB c344 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood WTR E1JC c345 Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study WTR E1JD c346 PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment WTR E1JE c340 2012 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JK c375 Main Street Watermain STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AC c404 Citywide Safety Improvements STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) WTR E2CA c388 2012 Waterline Overlay Program WTR E2CB c389 Pioneer Way Road Repair STR E2CC c399 5th Ave Overlay Project PM E2DB c146 Interurban Trail STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System Revised 9/11/2014 Packet Page 90 of 349 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STM E2FD c381 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 STM E2FE c382 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements SWR E2GA c369 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update SWR E2GB c390 Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP) STR E3AA c420 School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STR E3DA c421 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FA c406 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement STM E3FB c407 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FD c409 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FF c428 190th Pl SW Wall Construction STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E3GB c142 OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements WTR E3JA c397 2013 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E3JB c141 OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LA c393 Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring Revised 9/11/2014 Packet Page 91 of 349 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title WTR E4JA c422 2014 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR E6DA c245 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project STR E6DB c256 Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project General E6MA c238 SR99 Enhancement Program STR E7AA c265 Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CB c268 Shell Valley Emergency Access Road STM E7FG m013 NPDES PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza SWR E8GA c298 Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) SWR E8GD c301 City-Wide Sewer Improvements PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PM E8MB c290 Marina Beach Additional Parking STR E9CA c294 2009 Street Overlay Program STR E9DA c312 226th Street Walkway Project STM E9FB c307 Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation SWR E9GA c304 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design PM E9MA c321 Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements Revised 9/11/2014 Packet Page 92 of 349 AM-7152 4. C. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:09/23/2014 Time:Consent Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Lori Palmer Department:Finance Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #210519 through #210629 dated September 18, 2014 for $253,666.59. Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks (replacement check #61065 through #61066) #61069 through #61085 for $476,165.93, benefit checks#61068, #61086 through #61094 and wire payments of $423,990.52 for the period June 16, 2014 through June 30, 2014. Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments. Previous Council Action n/a Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Attachments Claims cks 09-18-14 Project Numbers 08-18-14 Payroll Benefits 09-15-14 Payroll Summary 09-15-14 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Sarah Mager 09/17/2014 03:37 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 09/18/2014 09:12 AM Mayor Dave Earling 09/18/2014 09:13 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 09/18/2014 04:50 PM Form Started By: Lori Palmer Started On: 09/16/2014 02:51 PM Final Approval Date: 09/18/2014 Packet Page 93 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210519 9/18/2014 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 14-87770 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 435.92 INTERPRETER FEE / PUBLIC DEFENDER 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 152.96 INTERPRETER FEE14-87771 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 1,436.64 INTERPRETER FEE PUBLIC DEFENDER 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 147.92 Total :2,173.44 210520 9/18/2014 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 338137 SENIOR CENTER RODENTS SENIOR CENTER RODENTS 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 105.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 9.98 Total :114.98 210521 9/18/2014 072189 ACCESS 0727804 INV#0727804 ACCT#STC61515 - EDMONDS PD SHRED 2 TOTES 7/11/2014 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 80.00 Total :80.00 210522 9/18/2014 065568 ALLWATER INC 090414058 WWTP - DRINKING WATER drinking water 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 84.92 Total :84.92 210523 9/18/2014 063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC TM-142733 Traffic Control - Yellow Traffic Paint Traffic Control - Yellow Traffic Paint 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1,714.50 White Traffic Paint - 50Gal 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 569.50 Glass Beads 1Page: Packet Page 94 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210523 9/18/2014 (Continued)063862 ALPINE PRODUCTS INC 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 840.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 214.63 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 317.17 Total :3,655.80 210524 9/18/2014 068857 AMEC EARTH & ENVIRONMENTAL INC S22720843 Perrinville Fish Exclusion 2014-1 Perrinville Fish Exclusion 2014-1 422.000.72.531.40.41.00 1,924.22 Total :1,924.22 210525 9/18/2014 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC YY46 WWTP - MONTHLY NPDES monthly NPDES testing 423.000.76.535.80.41.31 165.00 Total :165.00 210526 9/18/2014 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1987550180 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 2Page: Packet Page 95 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210526 9/18/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987550181 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 10.32 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 10.31 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.98 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.98 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987550182 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.28 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.59 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987557379 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 16.45 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.56 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987561654 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 3Page: Packet Page 96 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210526 9/18/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987561655 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987561656 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 15.62 FLEET DIVISION MATS 4Page: Packet Page 97 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210526 9/18/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.59 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.48 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987568727 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 16.45 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.56 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987572974 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 5Page: Packet Page 98 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210526 9/18/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987572975 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987572976 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.28 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.59 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987580148 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 36.01 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 3.42 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987584505 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 6Page: Packet Page 99 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210526 9/18/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987584506 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987584507 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 7.59 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 5.28 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.72 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.50 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987591655 7Page: Packet Page 100 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210526 9/18/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 16.45 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.56 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987595874 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987595875 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 8Page: Packet Page 101 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210526 9/18/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987595876 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.28 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.59 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 WWTP - UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS1987614363 wwtp uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 3.80 wwtp mats & towels 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 63.96 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 6.44 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1987614364 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 35.01 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 3.33 Total :473.96 210527 9/18/2014 074506 ATLAS SALES & RENTALS INC 93233-0009 COOLING SYSTEM RENTAL - SERVER ROOM CITY Cooling system rental - 5th week 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 295.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 28.03 Total :323.03 210528 9/18/2014 001795 AUTOGRAPHICS 79790 CITY DIRECTORY - PATRICK DOHERTY 9Page: Packet Page 102 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210528 9/18/2014 (Continued)001795 AUTOGRAPHICS Remove & replace name on City Directory 001.000.25.514.30.48.00 82.13 Total :82.13 210529 9/18/2014 073041 BECK & ASSOCIATES PLLC 2014-EDM-09 Swedish ACC/2014-0074 Swedish ACC/2014-0074 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 2,420.00 Total :2,420.00 210530 9/18/2014 066673 BILLS BLUEPRINT INC 495580 E4FA/E2FB.REPRODUCTION OF CONTRACT BOOKS E4FA.Reproduction of contract/spec books 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 181.47 E2FB.Reproduction of contract/spec books 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 90.73 Total :272.20 210531 9/18/2014 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 0784204-IN Fleet Auto Propane 658 Gal Fleet Auto Propane 658 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1,197.51 Fleet Auto Propane 390.2 Gal0784928-IN Fleet Auto Propane 390.2 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 713.59 Fleet Auto Propane 576 Gal0785915-IN Fleet Auto Propane 576 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1,089.65 Fleet Auto Propane 328.1 Gal0786514-IN Fleet Auto Propane 328.1 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 624.34 Fleet Auto Propane 400.40786710-IN Fleet Auto Propane 400.4 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 760.05 Fleet Auto Propane 348.6 Gal0787320-IN Fleet Auto Propane 348.6 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 662.82 10Page: Packet Page 103 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :5,047.962105319/18/2014 074307 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 210532 9/18/2014 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 76616 INV#76616 - EDMONDS PD - ANDERSON FLEECE JACKET LINER 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 145.00 CLOTH NAME TAG - GOLD 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 4.95 HEAT STAMP REFLECTIVE LETTERS 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 6.00 SEW EMBLEM ON GARMENT 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 1.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.24.00 14.91 INV#89934 - EDMONDS PD - LEE89934 TACTICAL HARNESS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 37.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 3.61 Total :213.42 210533 9/18/2014 066578 BROWN AND CALDWELL 14223711 WWTP - PROFESSIONAL SERVICE Task 001 - Clarifier Ladder Access 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 2,919.97 Total :2,919.97 210534 9/18/2014 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC PD76735 PROLINE 1000BSX SFP AND TRIPP 3M FIBER Proline 10000BSX SFP F/CISCO 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 424.48 TRIPP 3M FIBER 62.5/125 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 61.04 Freight 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 34.28 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 49.39 CISCO 2.4 GH 4DBIPF99663 CISCO 2.4 GH 4DBI Dual Band OMNI 11Page: Packet Page 104 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210534 9/18/2014 (Continued)069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 947.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 90.02 TRIPP LITE 1M MM 50 FIB CABPH65324 Return Tripp Lite 1 M MM 50 Fib 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 -194.90 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 -18.52 CISCO UCS QUICK START WITH VMWARESE 1400313 Cisco UCS Quick Start 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 9,457.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 898.46 Total :11,749.35 210535 9/18/2014 068484 CEMEX LLC 9429147032 Storm Dump Fees Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 262.22 Total :262.22 210536 9/18/2014 063902 CITY OF EVERETT I14002190 Water Quality - Water Lab Analysis Water Quality - Water Lab Analysis 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 1,150.20 Total :1,150.20 210537 9/18/2014 074883 CLYBORNE, CADENCE 08-18-2014 EVELOPES AND STAMPS FOR BID Envelopes and stamps for member mailing 627.000.61.558.70.49.00 50.30 EVELOPES AND STAMPS FOR BID08-20-14 Printing for member mailing 627.000.61.558.70.49.00 377.45 STAMPS FOR MEMBER MAILING BID09-11-14 Reimbursement for postage for member 627.000.61.558.70.49.00 147.00 DOMAIN REGISTRATION & GRID SERVICE1318905 12Page: Packet Page 105 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210537 9/18/2014 (Continued)074883 CLYBORNE, CADENCE Domain Registration & grid service for 627.000.61.558.70.49.00 215.00 Total :789.75 210538 9/18/2014 004095 COASTWIDE LABS W2698143 Fac Maint - TT, Polish, Towels, Hand Fac Maint - TT, Polish, Towels, Hand 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 496.31 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 47.15 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIESW2698182 LINERS, BRAWNY, DISINF CL, DISP SOAP, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1,063.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 101.08 Total :1,708.51 210539 9/18/2014 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC OCT-14 C/A CITYOFED000001 Oct-14 Fiber Optics Internet Connection 001.000.31.518.87.42.00 406.00 Total :406.00 210540 9/18/2014 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3291984 E3DC.INVITATION TO BID AD E3DC.Invitation to Bid Ad 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 418.00 Total :418.00 210541 9/18/2014 074928 DALE TURNER FAMILY YMCA AUG-14 PAYMENT FOR YOST POOL OPERATIONS 7/26/14 PAYMENT FOR YOST POOL OPERATIONS 001.000.64.575.51.41.00 23,875.73 Total :23,875.73 210542 9/18/2014 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 348092 E1AA.SERVICES THRU 8/30/14 E1AA.Services thru 8/30/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 2,691.92 Total :2,691.92 13Page: Packet Page 106 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210543 9/18/2014 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 14-3478 INV#14-3478 - EDMONDS PD TRANSCRIPTION CASE #14-2471 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 257.40 TRANSCRIPTION CASE #14-2507 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 62.70 TRANSCRIPTION CASE #14-3356 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 56.10 TRANSCRIPTION CASE #14-1550 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 141.90 TRANSCRIPTION14-3481 TBD transcription of 09/09 minutes 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 84.00 Total :602.10 210544 9/18/2014 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 29117 WWTP - SUPPLIES, 2 CYCLE OIL 2 cycle oil 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 9.99 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 0.95 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE35246 battery 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 159.99 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 15.20 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE37693 powerated v-belt 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 19.87 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 1.89 WWTP - SUPPLIES38986 #77 sensors - X4 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 91.96 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 8.74 Brake parts cleaner39765 Brake parts cleaner 14Page: Packet Page 107 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210544 9/18/2014 (Continued)007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 47.04 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 4.47 Total :360.10 210545 9/18/2014 007850 EDMONDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE 985-61-6834 Hortic 985-61-6834 DILL INTRO TO HORTICULTURE INTRO TO HORTICULTURE CLASS 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 351.33 Total :351.33 210546 9/18/2014 075004 EDMONDS POST OFFICE 09-08-14 PO BOX CHARGES BID 12 month PO Box charges 627.000.61.558.70.49.00 100.00 Total :100.00 210547 9/18/2014 069912 EDMONDS PUBLIC FACILITIES DIST WOTS-701 WOTS TICKET PRINTING 310 ADVANCE TICKETS-WOTS 117.100.64.573.20.49.00 155.00 Total :155.00 210548 9/18/2014 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 5-10351 23823 76TH AVE W 23823 76TH AVE W 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 70.40 Total :70.40 210549 9/18/2014 069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 201333 INV#201333 CLIENT #5118 - EDMONDS PD EUTHANASIA SERVICE- IMP#9088 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 25.00 ACEPROMAZINE (NET) - IMP#9089 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 1.00 FRONTLINE PLUS - IMP#9089 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 18.00 ANESTHESIA - IMPOUND #9089 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 55.00 WOUND TREATMENT - IMP#9089 15Page: Packet Page 108 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210549 9/18/2014 (Continued)069878 EDMONDS-WESTGATE VET HOSPITAL 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 25.00 CAPSTAR SINGLE DOES IMP#9089 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 7.25 WORMING INJECTION IMP#9089 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 29.50 SPAY DOG - IMPOUND #9081 001.000.41.521.70.49.01 97.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 2.97 Total :261.22 210550 9/18/2014 069686 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING CO 74092 WWTP - SOFTWARE SUPPORT Extended software support for the EMC 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 995.00 Total :995.00 210551 9/18/2014 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH584790 E3DC.INVITATION TO BID AD E3DC.Invitation to Bid Ad 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 182.32 Eric Thuesen/PLN20130014 legal ads.EDH585858 Eric Thuesen/PLN20130014 legal ads. 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 77.40 Total :259.72 210552 9/18/2014 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU33134 LS 2 - Supplies LS 2 - Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 22.61 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2.15 Water - Scrub BrushesWAMOU33355 Water - Scrub Brushes 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 65.13 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.19 16Page: Packet Page 109 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :96.082105529/18/2014 066378 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY 210553 9/18/2014 071026 FASTSIGNS OF LYNNWOOD 443 15257 P&R LOGO TABLECOVER FOR EVENTS P&R LOGO TABLECOVER FOR EVENTS 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 249.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 23.66 Total :272.66 210554 9/18/2014 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 0426289 Water Inventory - 4 Rolls 0333 ~ Water Inventory - 4 Rolls 0333 ~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,307.65 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 124.23 Water Inventory - #0333 ~0426289-1 Water Inventory - #0333 ~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 653.82 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 62.11 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES3067568-1 COP TUBE, WROT TEE, PLUMBERS GRSE, ADPT 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 262.38 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 24.92 Total :2,435.11 210555 9/18/2014 011900 FRONTIER 206-188-0247 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY ACCOUNT TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY ACCOUNT 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 252.28 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY ACCOUNT 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 252.28 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES253-003-6887 LIFT STATION #6 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 41.67 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 17Page: Packet Page 110 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210555 9/18/2014 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 5.48 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 20.81 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 20.81 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 20.81 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 20.81 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 20.78 WWTP AFTER HOUR BUSINESS LINE425-712-0423 WWTP AFTER HOUR BUSINESS LINE 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 67.21 CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 MEADOWDALE RD425-745-4313 CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 126.64 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES425-774-1031 LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRADE SPECIAL 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 48.69 RANGER STATION PHONE425-775-1344 RANGER STATION PHONE 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 62.98 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE425-775-7865 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FIVE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 62.98 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE425-776-1281 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 50.39 LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINE425-776-2742 LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACCESS LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 27.87 CITY HALL ALARM LINES 121 5TH AVE N425-776-6829 CITY HALL FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 7.19 18Page: Packet Page 111 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :1,109.682105559/18/2014 011900 011900 FRONTIER 210556 9/18/2014 011210 GC SYSTEMS INC 000029436A Alderwood Repairs - 2 way Solenoids Alderwood Repairs - 2 way Solenoids 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 326.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.81 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 31.90 Alderwood Repair Parts - Check Valves000029486A Alderwood Repair Parts - Check Valves 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 178.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.32 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 17.80 Alderwood Water Repair Parts - Solenoid000029489A Alderwood Water Repair Parts - Solenoid 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 425.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 8.35 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 41.17 Total :1,047.35 210557 9/18/2014 072515 GOOGLE INC 11379151 GOOGLE MESSAGE SECURITY Google Message Security 09/01/2014 - 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 412.00 Total :412.00 210558 9/18/2014 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 149488/1 Water Inventory - #0429~ Water Inventory - #0429~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,385.52 #381 - W-RESET-0.75-018 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 227.60 #382 - W-RESET-01-012 19Page: Packet Page 112 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210558 9/18/2014 (Continued)069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 383.64 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 189.69 Water Inventory - #500 W-VALVCI-08-010150125/1 Water Inventory - #500 W-VALVCI-08-010 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 793.00 Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 589.52 #473 - W-VALVBR-01.5-30 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 258.16 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 99.85 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 56.01 Water Supplies150680/1 Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 373.96 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 35.53 Water Supplies150813/1 Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 131.28 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 12.47 Water Inventory - #575 W-RESET-01-006150814/1 Water Inventory - #575 W-RESET-01-006 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,127.10 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 107.07 Sewer - Fernco, Plugs, Pipe Gaskets,151275/1 Sewer - Fernco, Plugs, Pipe Gaskets, 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1,767.18 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 167.88 20Page: Packet Page 113 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :7,705.462105589/18/2014 069733 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 210559 9/18/2014 012560 HACH COMPANY 9004240 WWTP - SUPPLIES lab supplies 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 441.23 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 30.89 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 44.85 WWTP - SUPPLIES9006660 lab supplies 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 154.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 17.79 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 16.32 WWTP - SUPPLIES9008768 lab supplies 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 229.31 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 30.89 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 24.72 Water Quality - Fluoride and Chlorine9009375 Water Quality - Fluoride and Chlorine 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 309.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 30.89 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 32.30 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE9013550 Chlorine analyzer repair/maintenance 423.000.76.535.80.48.22 3,323.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.22 294.25 9.5% Sales Tax 21Page: Packet Page 114 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210559 9/18/2014 (Continued)012560 HACH COMPANY 423.000.76.535.80.48.22 343.65 Total :5,323.09 210560 9/18/2014 010900 HD FOWLER CO INC I3670498 Water - 4" Meter Replacement Parts ~ Water - 4" Meter Replacement Parts ~ 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 711.29 Water Parts - Meter Lids and Boxes 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2,378.65 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 293.55 Water Parts for 4" Meter Replacement atI3683360 Water Parts for 4" Meter Replacement at 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 208.56 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 19.82 Water Inventory - #570 ~I3714802 Water Inventory - #570 ~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 493.34 Water Parts - Quick Joints, Couplings, 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 4,069.68 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 46.87 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 386.62 Water Supplies - Concrete Meter BoxI3714803 Water Supplies - Concrete Meter Box 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 223.95 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 21.28 Water - Parts, Romac Saddle SuppliesI3727624 Water - Parts, Romac Saddle Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2,031.44 Water Inventory - ~ 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 259.74 #328 W-MTRLIDDI-02-010 22Page: Packet Page 115 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210560 9/18/2014 (Continued)010900 HD FOWLER CO INC 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 305.78 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 192.99 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 53.72 Water - Supplies - Quick Joint BallI3727625 Water - Supplies - Quick Joint Ball 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 494.43 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 46.97 Total :12,238.68 210561 9/18/2014 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2508096 CAWRSE.MONITOR STANDS Cawrse.Monitor Stands 001.000.67.532.20.49.00 80.58 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.67.532.20.49.00 7.66 SCHRODER.CHAIR2508865 Schroder.Chair 001.000.67.532.20.49.00 355.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.67.532.20.49.00 33.73 Office supplies2510452 Office supplies 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 30.66 Shared office supplies- copier paper 001.000.61.557.20.31.00 39.99 Shared office supplies- copier paper 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 39.99 Shared office supplies- copier paper 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 39.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 6.71 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.31.00 3.80 23Page: Packet Page 116 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210561 9/18/2014 (Continued)073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 3.80 SUPPLIES2510467 SUPPLIES 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 302.87 Total :944.78 210562 9/18/2014 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 745066 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES GLOVES, PADS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 292.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 27.75 PARKS MAINT RETURN745068 GLOVE RETURN 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 -39.75 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 -3.78 Total :276.37 210563 9/18/2014 075005 JOHNSON, ERIK 09-09-14 BID 50% COMPLETION OF WEBSITE PHOTOS 50% completion of website photos 627.000.61.558.70.41.00 600.00 Total :600.00 210564 9/18/2014 067877 KINGSTON LUMBER SUPPLY COMPANY 312445 Traffic - 4x4's Traffic - 4x4's 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1,549.30 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 147.18 Total :1,696.48 210565 9/18/2014 075006 KNUTH, LINDSAY 09/11/14 REFUND CUSTOMER REQUESTED REFUND CHECK CUSTOMER REQUESTED REFUND CHECK 001.000.239.200 151.57 Total :151.57 24Page: Packet Page 117 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210566 9/18/2014 072059 LEE, NICOLE 1332 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 142.56 Total :142.56 210567 9/18/2014 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO 005477-00 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES THRD PRV LF, 3/4 SXS S4 CPLG, DBRY BAG 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 490.77 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 46.62 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES005485-00 PVC, PIPE, FLEX FITTING, PVC CEMENT, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 57.36 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 5.45 PARKS MAINT RETURN005516-00 APOLLO 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 -298.09 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 -28.32 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES005517-00 BLUE CNTR HOSE, COUPLER, SLIP PVC40 CAP 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 160.87 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 15.28 Total :449.94 210568 9/18/2014 066191 MACLEOD RECKORD 6913 E1DA.SERVICES THRU 6/30/14 E1DA.Services thru 6/30/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 555.81 E1DA.SERVICES THRU 7/31/146930 E1DA.Services thru 7/31/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 4,248.31 Total :4,804.12 210569 9/18/2014 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 1386 INTERPRETER FEE 25Page: Packet Page 118 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210569 9/18/2014 (Continued)069362 MARSHALL, CITA INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 88.32 Total :88.32 210570 9/18/2014 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 9/9/2014 LEOFF 1 medical reimbursement LEOFF 1 medical reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 7,391.25 Total :7,391.25 210571 9/18/2014 063773 MICROFLEX 00022044 08-14 TAX AUDIT PROGRAM Tax Audit Program 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 189.19 Total :189.19 210572 9/18/2014 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 196901 Street - Edger Street - Edger 111.000.68.542.71.35.00 399.96 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.71.35.00 38.00 PARKS MAINT EQUIP & SUPPLIES197544 BLOWER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 399.96 2 CYCLE OIL 001.000.64.576.81.35.00 167.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 38.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.35.00 15.94 PARKS MAINT PART197545 PRESSURE WASHER PART 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 8.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 0.76 Total :1,068.42 26Page: Packet Page 119 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210573 9/18/2014 069923 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC WA33-632134 WWTP - REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 3phase TEFC Electric Motor, Received by 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 4,000.85 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 133.75 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 392.79 Total :4,527.39 210574 9/18/2014 069471 NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, TRAINING CENTER1962 INV 1962 - LVNR TRAINER CERT - DAVID MAC LVNR CERTIFICATION - MACHADO` 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 150.00 Total :150.00 210575 9/18/2014 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0383296-IN Street - Rain Gear Street - Rain Gear 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 35.75 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 4.66 Freight 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 13.35 Total :53.76 210576 9/18/2014 070045 NORTHUP GROUP 3027 INV 3027 - EDMONDS PD PRE EMPLOY EVAL - 8/14 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 340.00 PRE EMPLOY EVAL - 8/25 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 340.00 Total :680.00 210577 9/18/2014 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 2-1013077 CIVIC FIELD HONEY BUCKET CIVIC FIELD HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 115.65 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY BUCKET2-1015366 MATHAY BALLINGER PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 206.58 27Page: Packet Page 120 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :322.232105779/18/2014 061013 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 210578 9/18/2014 073012 NORTHWEST SIGN RECYCLING 1890 Traffic - Hydrostripping Traffic - Hydrostripping 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 381.79 Total :381.79 210579 9/18/2014 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 356633 PW Office Supplies PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 36.00 Water- Toner 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 66.64 PW Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 145.52 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 17.24 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.33 INV#365246 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD365246 COPY HOLDER (TRYKAR) 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 8.66 BLUE GEL PENS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.80 WHITE ADDRESS DYMO LABELS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 14.84 SMALL BINDER CLIPS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 16.60 SHARPIES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 20.30 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 6.77 INV#401028 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS PD401028 INK REFILL BOTTLE (BLUE) 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 5.68 RETRACTABLE BLACK INK PENS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 70.92 28Page: Packet Page 121 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210579 9/18/2014 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC RETRACTABLE BLUE INK PENS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 47.90 KLEENEX FACIAL TISSUES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 40.61 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 15.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES444726 LABEL MAKER TAPE, PENS 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 31.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 2.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES506344 PAPER, CORRECTION FLUID 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 14.79 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 1.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES513145 CORRECTION FLUID 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 1.20 NAME BADGE SUPPLIES FOR WOTS 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 163.51 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 0.11 9.5% Sales Tax 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 15.54 Total :761.27 210580 9/18/2014 074545 OLDS-OLYMPIC INC 1424301 Unit CS-1 Fuel Unit CS-1 Fuel 511.000.77.548.68.34.11 372.33 Total :372.33 210581 9/18/2014 073896 OLYMPIC BRAKE SUPPLY 2-263555 Unit 49 - Brake Shoe Unit 49 - Brake Shoe 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 33.35 29Page: Packet Page 122 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210581 9/18/2014 (Continued)073896 OLYMPIC BRAKE SUPPLY 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.17 Total :36.52 210582 9/18/2014 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 0021400 FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / METER R130 FIRE STATION #20 88TH AVE W / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 181.31 Total :181.31 210583 9/18/2014 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 11549 YOST POOL SUPPLIES ACID MAGIC 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 287.85 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 27.35 Total :315.20 210584 9/18/2014 072739 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS 636 Shop - Parts Shop - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 27.36 Unit 252 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 16.27 Total :43.63 210585 9/18/2014 075007 ORTHODONTICS EXCLUSIVELY 9/12/14 REFUND BANNE REFUND FOR BANNER REFUND FOR BANNER 001.000.239.200 375.00 Total :375.00 210586 9/18/2014 071402 PACIFIC NW FLOAT TRIPS 19060 GOLD PANNING 19060 GOLD PANNING INSTRUCTOR FEE 19060 GOLD PANNING INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 169.52 Total :169.52 210587 9/18/2014 074116 PAJER, BERNADETTE LIT WALK PAJER PRESENTATION AND WRITING EXERCISE FOR LI PRESENTATION AND WRITING EXERCISE FOR 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 150.00 30Page: Packet Page 123 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :150.002105879/18/2014 074116 074116 PAJER, BERNADETTE 210588 9/18/2014 027165 PARKER PAINT MFG. CO.INC.4489-8 Grandstand - Paint Supplies Grandstand - Paint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 121.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.50 Total :132.50 210589 9/18/2014 069338 PARTNER CONSTRUCTION PRODUCT 6626 Roadway - Crafco Roadsaver low Tack, Roadway - Crafco Roadsaver low Tack, 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 1,962.50 Freight 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 75.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 193.56 Roadway - Crafco Roadsaver Low Tack,6629 Roadway - Crafco Roadsaver Low Tack, 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 1,962.50 Freight 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 75.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 193.56 Roadway - Crafco Roadsaver Low Tack6673 Roadway - Crafco Roadsaver Low Tack 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 3,375.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 125.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 332.50 Total :8,294.62 210590 9/18/2014 073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 10293 INV 10293 EDMONDS PD 4 - PERSONNEL EVALUATION PROFILES 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 80.00 31Page: Packet Page 124 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :80.002105909/18/2014 073871 073871 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC 210591 9/18/2014 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 212858 WWTP - DEPT. OF ENTERPRISE SERVICES POST Washington State Drpot of Enterprise 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 24.98 Total :24.98 210592 9/18/2014 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870 PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR CITY PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR CITY 422.000.72.531.90.51.00 2,513.24 Total :2,513.24 210593 9/18/2014 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 46.89 Total :46.89 210594 9/18/2014 067263 PUGET SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 0021578-IN WWTP - SAFETY SUPPLIES safety supplies 423.000.76.535.80.31.12 179.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.12 17.04 Total :196.44 210595 9/18/2014 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / ME FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,421.22 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST / METER 0200007876143 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST / METER 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 71.55 FIRE STATION # 16 8429 196TH ST SW / MET200009595790 FIRE STATION # 16 8429 196TH ST SW / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 217.34 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W / METE200011439656 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 119.01 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / METER 00052200016558856 32Page: Packet Page 125 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210595 9/18/2014 (Continued)046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 161.82 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 0200016815843 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 274.10 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 72ND AVE W /200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 72ND AVE W 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 115.10 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE R200019375639 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 79.93 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 001200019895354 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 81.01 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / METE200020415911 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 7.88 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 29.94 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 29.94 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 29.94 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 29.94 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 29.95 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / METER 000390395200021829581 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / METER 000390395 423.000.76.535.80.47.63 85.92 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE S / METER200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE S / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 70.50 Total :2,855.09 33Page: Packet Page 126 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210596 9/18/2014 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 14-0658 COURT SECURITY COURT SECURITY 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 2,857.50 Total :2,857.50 210597 9/18/2014 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 00000148538 MONUMENT INSCRIPTION MCGINNESS, MARVENE MONUMENT INSCRIPTION MCGINNESS, MARVENE 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 210.00 Total :210.00 210598 9/18/2014 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 147.84 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW3-0197-0800897 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 29.73 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 112.99 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 112.99 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 112.99 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 112.99 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 112.98 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW3-0197-0801132 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 158.07 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD3-0197-0829729 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 69.50 Total :970.08 210599 9/18/2014 006841 RICOH USA INC 5032264396 Meter charges for Engineering copier Meter charges for Engineering copier 34Page: Packet Page 127 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210599 9/18/2014 (Continued)006841 RICOH USA INC 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 289.28 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 27.48 Meter charges for the large copier5032265696 Meter charges for the large copier 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 61.28 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 5.82 Total :383.86 210600 9/18/2014 070042 RICOH USA INC 93161958 Renewal of MPC6000 for billing period Renewal of MPC6000 for billing period 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 443.48 Renewal for large copier 907EX for93161963 Renewal for large copier 907EX for 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 827.00 Total :1,270.48 210601 9/18/2014 069062 RONGERUDE, JOHN 8061 PUBLIC DEFENDER PUBLIC DEFENDER 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 1,600.00 Total :1,600.00 210602 9/18/2014 071467 S MORRIS COMPANY AUG 2014 INVOICE 8/31/14 ACCT#70014 - EDMONDS PD #170786 2 NPC 8/7/2014 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 22.96 #150612 9 NPC 8/21/2014 001.000.41.521.70.41.00 103.32 Total :126.28 210603 9/18/2014 068423 SANDBLASTERS, INC.23705 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 2 piece pump repair 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 95.00 misc sales tax % 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 8.36 35Page: Packet Page 128 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210603 9/18/2014 (Continued)068423 SANDBLASTERS, INC. WWTP - REPAIR & MAINTENANCE23733 Impeller & Volute 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 95.00 misc sales tax % 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 8.36 Total :206.72 210604 9/18/2014 074970 SEATTLE PROF AUTO GLASS 149919 Unit 304 - Glass Replacement Unit 304 - Glass Replacement 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 1,233.75 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 117.21 Unit M16 - Install Replacement Glass160363 Unit M16 - Install Replacement Glass 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 136.00 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 12.92 Total :1,499.88 210605 9/18/2014 067076 SEATTLE PUMP AND EQUIPMENT CO 14-3336 Unit 106 - Vacuum Tube Unit 106 - Vacuum Tube 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 202.80 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 19.26 Total :222.06 210606 9/18/2014 066738 SETCOM CORPORATION 19735 Unit 405 - Repairs and Freight Unit 405 - Repairs and Freight 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 129.32 Total :129.32 210607 9/18/2014 074906 SITE WORKSHOP LLC 3483 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CITY PA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CITY 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 11,296.80 Total :11,296.80 36Page: Packet Page 129 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210608 9/18/2014 036955 SKY NURSERY T-0393091 FLOWER PROGRAM 4TH & MAIN PLANTING MIX 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 56.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 5.32 Total :61.32 210609 9/18/2014 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0291-9 LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AVE / METER LIFT STATION #8 113 RAILROAD AVE / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 121.25 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W / METER 12002-7495-9 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 32.33 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W / METER 12004-9315-3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 76TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 50.32 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 76TH AVE W / METER 12005-9488-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 76TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 29.50 600 3RD AVE S2006-5085-1 600 3RD AVE S 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 31.27 600 3RD AVE S2006-5164-4 600 3RD AVE S 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 405.42 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW / METER 12007-4860-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 31.27 250 6TH AVE N2008-6924-6 250 6TH AVE N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 69.41 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND AVE S / METE2009-1385-3 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 115 2ND AVE S / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 35.17 HICKMAN PARK2011-8453-8 HICKMAN PARK 37Page: Packet Page 130 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210609 9/18/2014 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 159.55 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W / METER 12011-8789-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21132 76TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 34.80 CITY PARK GAZEBO2013-8327-0 CITY PARK GAZEBO 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 31.27 250 6TH AVE N2014-5305-7 250 6TH AVE N 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 115.43 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1/2 211TH PL SW /2015-0127-7 LIFT STATION #14 7905 1/2 211TH PL SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 33.07 LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON ST / METER2015-3292-6 LIFT STATION #7 121 W DAYTON ST / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 264.79 STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 150W) / NO2017-1178-5 STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 150W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 1,113.95 600 3RD AVE S2021-1448-4 600 3RD AVE S 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 69.17 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 7801 212TH ST SW /2021-9128-4 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 7801 212TH ST SW / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 31.27 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / METER 100042022-8909-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 105.70 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W / METER 12023-5673-9 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21530 76TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 40.81 LIFT STATION #1 105 CASPERS ST / METER 12024-9953-9 LIFT STATION #1 105 CASPERS ST / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 721.00 STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ 200W) / NO2025-2918-6 38Page: Packet Page 131 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210609 9/18/2014 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ 200W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 2,562.30 STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 400W) / NOT2025-2920-2 STREET LIGHTING (13 LIGHTS @ 400W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 116.09 STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS @ 100W) / N2025-7615-3 STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS @ 100W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 14,654.05 STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 250W) / NOT2025-7948-8 STREET LIGHTING (58 LIGHTS @ 250W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 337.50 STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150W) / NOT M2047-1489-3 STREET LIGHTING (1 LIGHT @ 150W) / NOT 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 3.75 STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 200W) / NOT2047-1492-7 STREET LIGHTING (18 LIGHTS @ 200W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 83.38 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 400W) / NOT2047-1493-5 STREET LIGHTING (5 LIGHTS @ 400W) / NOT 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 43.94 STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 100W) / NOT2047-1494-3 STREET LIGHTING (2 LIGHTS @ 100W) / NOT 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 11.15 STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 250W) / NOT2047-1495-0 STREET LIGHTING (26 LIGHTS @ 250W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 151.58 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METER 102051-8438-5 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 48.79 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 226122053-0758-0 DECORATIVE & STREET LIGHTING 22612 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 227.18 Total :21,766.46 210610 9/18/2014 006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 64964 PARKS MAINT SOLID WASTE AUG 39Page: Packet Page 132 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210610 9/18/2014 (Continued)006630 SNOHOMISH COUNTY PARKS MAINT SOLID WASTE AUG 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 1,231.00 Total :1,231.00 210611 9/18/2014 068618 SNOHOMISH COUNTY PARKS DEPT 100 YOST SWIM TEAM ENTRANCE FEES 2014 CHAMPS YOST SWIM TEAM ENTRANCE FEES 2014 001.000.64.575.51.49.00 324.80 Total :324.80 210612 9/18/2014 037800 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DISTRICT AR11 2896 HEALTH TESTS 2896 HEALTH TESTS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 108.00 Total :108.00 210613 9/18/2014 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103583 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 595.74 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST103585 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 700 MAIN ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 674.47 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST103586 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 555.23 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N103588 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 459.89 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / ASH DISPOSAL104757 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / ASH DISPOSAL 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 3,847.83 Total :6,133.16 210614 9/18/2014 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 4238935 WWTP - RANCHER BOOTS, BRIAN FUNK Bogs Rancher - Steel Toe Boots 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 107.00 9.5% Sales Tax 40Page: Packet Page 133 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210614 9/18/2014 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 10.17 WWTP - BIB OVERALL, JACKET, AND WORKWEAR4238941-01 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 22.99 Carhart Work-flex coat, Surrey Bib 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 242.01 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES4239059-0001-04 MESH VEST ORANGE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 13.77 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.31 Total :397.25 210615 9/18/2014 074990 STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES 822772 E1FH.SERVICES THRU JULY 2014 E1FH.Services thru July 2014 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 738.50 Total :738.50 210616 9/18/2014 040250 STEUBER DISTRIBUTING 2782428 VOLUNTEER PROJECT BASKETS PRO MIX 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 150.00 8.8% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 13.20 Total :163.20 210617 9/18/2014 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC 16423 Telemetry - SCADA Troubleshooting Telemetry - SCADA Troubleshooting 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 104.00 Telemetry - SCADA Troubleshooting 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 104.00 Total :208.00 210618 9/18/2014 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 11409037 Traffic - Red Safety marking paint Traffic - Red Safety marking paint 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 88.80 41Page: Packet Page 134 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210618 9/18/2014 (Continued)040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 8.44 Traffic - 16" Floor Sweep(12), Sweep11409038 Traffic - 16" Floor Sweep(12), Sweep 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 633.02 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 60.14 Traffic - Nylon Flat Washers, Teri11410171 Traffic - Nylon Flat Washers, Teri 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 268.22 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 25.48 Total :1,084.10 210619 9/18/2014 071666 TETRA TECH INC 50832068 WWTP - SERVICES Control System, Task 03.13 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 120.00 WWTP - SERVICES50832070 Flow Meter PLC Programming, Task 04.14 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 4,511.00 Total :4,631.00 210620 9/18/2014 074277 THE FALCONER GROUP 14-022 Consulting services provided to the City Consulting services provided to the City 001.000.11.550.10.49.00 2,470.00 Total :2,470.00 210621 9/18/2014 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR US54073 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 23.06 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER 220 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 242.77 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING CIVIC CENTERUS54537 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING CIVIC CENTER 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 49.70 42Page: Packet Page 135 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210621 9/18/2014 (Continued)038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING SENIOR CENTERUS54628 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING SENIOR CENTER 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 14.95 Total :330.48 210622 9/18/2014 074800 TURNSTYLE INC 3194 PHASE 2B AND PHASE 3 BID Professional Fees for BID for work 627.000.61.558.70.41.00 15,000.00 Total :15,000.00 210623 9/18/2014 043935 UPS 00002T4T13344 Shipping charges from Bldg. Dept. to Shipping charges from Bldg. Dept. to 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 18.53 Total :18.53 210624 9/18/2014 062693 US BANK 090814 WWTP - AUGUST 2014 CC CHARGES Dept of Revenue, UBI # 312 000 093, 423.000.76.535.80.51.00 171.00 INV#2519 09/08/14 - TRAINING - EDMONDS P2519 FUEL/ADV MTCYL/EVOC-HARBINSON 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 24.57 MEAL/ADV MTCYL/EVOC-HARBINSON 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 12.00 FUEL/ADV MTCYL/EVOC-HARBINSON 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 26.00 MEAL/ADV MTCYL/EVOC-HARBINSON 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 17.50 MEAL/ADV MTCY/EVOC-HARBINSON 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 7.05 MEAL/ADV MTCYL/EVOC-HARBINSON 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 28.50 LODGING/ADV MTCY/EVOC-HARBINSON 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 182.60 FOOD/ADV MTCYL/EVOC-HARBINSON 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 4.31 43Page: Packet Page 136 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210624 9/18/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK WA FINANCE OFFCRS ASSOC3065 WA FINANCE OFFCRS ASSOC 001.000.31.514.23.49.00 325.00 INV#3181 09/08/14 - BARD - EDMONDS PD3181 AIRFARE/BEST IN WEST SWAT-LIM 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 130.20 TLO SEARCHES 07/2014 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 39.25 TLO SEARCHES 08/2014 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 25.50 MINDFLASH-MO FEE FOR ONLINE TRAINING 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 398.00 INV#3314 09/08/14 - LAWLESS - EDMONDS PD3314 HOT SOLO BISTRO CUPS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 91.28 KENDALL SHARPES SHUTTLES 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 59.42 M3T MEDICAL POUCHES 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 1,803.00 TACVIEW IR/COLOR CAMERA 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 1,995.00 DOMAIN NAME/UPS3470 BulkRegister.com - domain name 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 198.00 Domain Registration/ Bulk Register SSL 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 210.00 Water Dept GPS/UPS 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 27.96 INV#3520 09/08/14 - TRAINING - EDMONDS P3520 FEDEX CHG RETURN THERMAL 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 10.48 FUEL/SEARCH WARRANTS-MEHL 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 15.82 MEAL/SEARCH WARRANTS-MEHL 44Page: Packet Page 137 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210624 9/18/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 37.32 LODGING/SEARCH WARRANTS-MEHL 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 94.30 FEDEX CHG - DNA PROP CRIMES 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 40.14 4675 PARKS CREDIT CARD4675 PARKS CR CARD AMAZON: DISINFECTANT WIPES-GYM 001.000.64.575.54.31.00 87.60 AMAZON: TABLES FOR CEMETERY 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 69.39 AMAZON: TABLE FOR CEMETERY 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 138.78 AMAZON: PODIUM FOR CEMETERY 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 227.71 AMAZON: 2015 CALENDAR REFILL 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 24.99 AMAZON: PORTABLE HEATERS FOR 301 001.000.64.575.54.31.00 149.68 JOANNE: GYMNASTICS SUMMER CAMP CRAFTS, 001.000.64.575.55.31.00 23.61 SAFEWAY: SWIFFER JET REPLACEMENT 207 001.000.64.575.55.31.00 22.98 DOLLAR TREE: RHYTHMIC CAMP SUPPLIES 001.000.64.575.55.31.00 32.85 AMAZON: BOOK FOR TRANSPORTATION UNIT @ 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 6.24 DOLLAR TREE: WET N WILD CAMP SUPPLIES 001.000.64.575.51.31.00 20.81 S&S WORLDWIDE: MINI CONES FOR PRE 001.000.64.575.55.31.00 35.94 LYNNWOOD BOWL & SKATE: SKATING FEES FOR 001.000.64.575.53.49.00 55.00 JONES SCHOOL SUPPLY: AWARD RIBBONS FOR 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 57.55 45Page: Packet Page 138 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210624 9/18/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK TAP PLASTICS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9.52 ATTORNEY & NOTARY SERVICE: CYNTHIA CRUZ 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 53.38 ATTORNEY & NOTARY SERVICE: CYNTHIA CRUZ 001.000.64.571.21.49.00 80.00 OFFICEMAX: CALENDAR REFILL AND 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 26.27 CASH N CARRY: HOT AND COLD CUPS FOR 001.000.61.558.70.31.00 13.21 WSU: PESTICIDE TRAINING FOR EDHOUSE, 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 240.00 WSU: PESTICIDE TRAINING FOR DILL, BIRD, 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 360.00 WSU INTEGRATED WEED MGMT TRAINING FOR 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 150.00 FIRST CLASS: CARPET CLEANING FOR 001.000.64.575.55.41.00 249.00 TANKINZ NOODLE MFG: COOKIES FOR WOTS 117.100.64.573.20.31.00 81.50 HEKINAN DELEGATION4697 Hekinan student delegation Edmonds day 138.200.21.557.21.49.00 54.08 Student delegation welcome party 138.200.21.557.21.49.00 52.84 Hekinan student delegation bb supplies 138.200.21.557.21.49.00 61.11 office supplies 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 118.76 August Chamber Meeting 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 20.00 Hekinan student delegation bbq supplies 138.200.21.557.21.49.00 7.98 Office supplies -- rolodex 46Page: Packet Page 139 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210624 9/18/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 39.14 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 11.28 IT SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT5179 North Coast Electric 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 109.26 Changhong 42" 1080 p LED HDTV 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 359.98 HP Laser Jet 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 211.98 CDW Government 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 55.29 Monoprice/FLEXboot Ethernet Network 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 248.87 Server Supply Hard Disk Drive 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 178.20 IT Solutions Online Subscription 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 19.95 ASUS VS Series VS228H 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 129.99 PLN20140034/PostacardNotice_5-Year6045 PLN20140034/PostacardNotice_5-Year 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 831.94 UPS shipment to Beck & Assoc. in 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 7.17 Touchfire screentop keyboard for IPad 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 43.79 Starbucks coffee for the Tree Cutting 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 32.74 Webinar on Design Review: Purpose, 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 75.00 Book for Shane "True Urbanism." 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 25.98 Parking fee for Shane attending a Coal7209 47Page: Packet Page 140 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 48 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210624 9/18/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK Parking fee for Shane attending a Coal 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 6.00 Walgreens- Unit 17 - Supplies7299 Walgreens- Unit 17 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.02 E Harley - Unit 405 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 318.99 US BANK7483 August Mayor's Meeting 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 12.00 INV#7914 09/08/14-THOMPSON-EDMONDS PD7914 ROLATAPE MEASURING WHEEL 001.000.41.521.70.31.00 173.90 CR123A LITHIUM BATTERIES 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 51.11 SHIPPING BOOTS TO DANNER-YAMANE 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 9.96 BALL & GILLESPIE-2 PRE EMP EXAMS 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 457.00 REG/ ADV FTO REFRESHER-HAWLEY 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 100.00 REPAIR DANNER BOOTS-YAMANE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 200.00 BALL & GILLESPIE-2 PRE EMP EXAMS 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 457.00 MISSION STMT POSTCARDS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 78.21 OPEN END CATALOG ENVELOPES 001.000.41.521.80.31.00 68.33 MAGAZINE WALL ORGANIZER 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 32.72 ENG CREDIT CARD BILL AUGUST 20148313 E4FA.Click 2 Mail Notice 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 37.92 48Page: Packet Page 141 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 49 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210624 9/18/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK E4CA.Click 2 Mail Notice 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 86.76 E3GA.Click 2 Mail Notice 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 137.45 Total :13,124.91 210625 9/18/2014 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 4080123 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 89.21 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 89.21 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 91.92 Total :270.34 210626 9/18/2014 047200 WA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 77 NATIONAL PLAYGROUND SAFETY CERTIF TRAINI NATIONAL PLAYGROUND SAFETY 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 510.00 NATIONAL PLAYGROUND SAFETY CERTIF TRAINI78 NATIONAL PLAYGROUND SAFETY 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 510.00 Total :1,020.00 210627 9/18/2014 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 6424 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 977.40 Total :977.40 210628 9/18/2014 073739 WH PACIFIC INC 1897W-02 E1AA.SERVICES THRU 8/31/14 E1AA.Services thru 8/31/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 24,810.85 Total :24,810.85 210629 9/18/2014 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 0171651 Traffic- Sign Blanks 30x6 Alum Traffic- Sign Blanks 30x6 Alum 49Page: Packet Page 142 of 349 09/16/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 50 2:49:27PM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 210629 9/18/2014 (Continued)051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 652.50 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 41.48 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 65.93 Total :759.91 Bank total :253,666.59111 Vouchers for bank code :usbank 253,666.59Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report111 50Page: Packet Page 143 of 349 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STR E0AA c329 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade STM E0FC c326 Stormwater GIS Support WTR E0IA c324 AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements WTR E0JA c363 2010 Waterline Replacement Program FAC E0LA c327 Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project FAC E0LB c332 Senior Center Roof Repairs STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1AB c343 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements General E1EA c372 SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM E1FD c339 Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades STM E1FF c341 Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects STM E1FH c349 Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement SWR E1GA c347 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement WTR E1GB c370 Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update WTR E1JA c333 2011 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JB c344 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood WTR E1JC c345 Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study WTR E1JD c346 PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment WTR E1JE c340 2012 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JK c375 Main Street Watermain STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AC c404 Citywide Safety Improvements STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) WTR E2CA c388 2012 Waterline Overlay Program WTR E2CB c389 Pioneer Way Road Repair STR E2CC c399 5th Ave Overlay Project PM E2DB c146 Interurban Trail STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System Revised 9/16/2014 Packet Page 144 of 349 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STM E2FD c381 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 STM E2FE c382 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements SWR E2GA c369 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update SWR E2GB c390 Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP) STR E3AA c420 School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STR E3DA c421 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FA c406 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement STM E3FB c407 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FD c409 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FF c428 190th Pl SW Wall Construction STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E3GB c142 OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements WTR E3JA c397 2013 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E3JB c141 OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC E3LA c393 Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring Revised 9/16/2014 Packet Page 145 of 349 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title WTR E4JA c422 2014 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR E6DA c245 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project STR E6DB c256 Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project General E6MA c238 SR99 Enhancement Program STR E7AA c265 Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CB c268 Shell Valley Emergency Access Road STM E7FG m013 NPDES PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza SWR E8GA c298 Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) SWR E8GD c301 City-Wide Sewer Improvements PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PM E8MB c290 Marina Beach Additional Parking STR E9CA c294 2009 Street Overlay Program STR E9DA c312 226th Street Walkway Project STM E9FB c307 Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation SWR E9GA c304 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design PM E9MA c321 Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements Revised 9/16/2014 Packet Page 146 of 349 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 673 - 09/01/2014 to 09/15/2014 Bank: usbank - US Bank Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck # 61201 09/19/2014 mebt AST TTEE 82,268.11 0.00 61202 09/19/2014 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 2,749.50 0.00 61203 09/19/2014 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 436.50 0.00 61204 09/19/2014 flex FLEX-PLAN SERVICES, INC 710.76 0.00 61205 09/19/2014 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 4,237.00 0.00 61206 09/19/2014 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 1,885.81 0.00 92,287.68 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck # 2121 09/19/2014 uhc UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE CO 233,729.35 0.00 2128 09/19/2014 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 20,034.50 0.00 2129 09/19/2014 us US BANK 92,064.28 0.00 2132 09/19/2014 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,143.60 0.00 2133 09/19/2014 flex FLEX-PLAN SERVICES, INC 164.40 0.00 351,136.13 0.00 443,423.81 0.00Grand Totals: Page 1 of 19/17/2014 Packet Page 147 of 349 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 673 (09/01/2014 to 09/15/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description Educational Pay CorrectionREGULAR HOURS-ed2 0.00 -71.28 NO PAY NON HIREDABSENT112 92.00 0.00 SICK LEAVESICK121 653.75 23,110.02 VACATIONVACATION122 1,558.15 54,479.84 HOLIDAY HOURSHOLIDAY123 94.25 3,165.77 FLOATER HOLIDAYHOLIDAY124 16.00 438.94 COMPENSATORY TIMECOMP HOURS125 141.25 4,902.89 Police Sick Leave L & ISICK129 4.00 187.45 MILITARY LEAVEMILITARY131 10.00 438.06 BEREAVEMENTBEREAVEMENT141 59.00 1,727.63 Kelly Day UsedREGULAR HOURS150 72.00 2,628.37 COMPTIME BUY BACKCOMP HOURS152 10.00 269.54 FLOATER HOLIDAY BUY BACKHOLIDAY154 8.00 215.63 COMPTIME AUTO PAYCOMP HOURS155 28.75 1,160.74 VACATION PAYOFFVACATION158 69.10 1,862.52 MANAGEMENT LEAVEVACATION160 10.00 455.62 REGULAR HOURSREGULAR HOURS190 14,832.50 500,572.60 OVERTIME-STRAIGHTOVERTIME HOURS210 125.88 5,123.30 WATER WATCH STANDBYOVERTIME HOURS215 48.00 2,232.74 STANDBY TREATMENT PLANTMISCELLANEOUS216 15.00 1,436.88 OVERTIME 1.5OVERTIME HOURS220 186.25 11,172.19 OVERTIME-DOUBLEOVERTIME HOURS225 13.75 995.16 WORKING OUT OF CLASSMISCELLANEOUS410 0.00 180.72 SHIFT DIFFERENTIALSHIFT DIFFERENTIAL411 0.00 737.21 RETROACTIVE PAYRETROACTIVE PAY600 0.00 180.81 ACCRUED COMPCOMP HOURS602 85.50 0.00 ACCRUED COMP TIMECOMP HOURS604 109.00 0.00 ACCRUED COMP TIMECOMP HOURS606 3.00 0.00 Holiday Compensatory Time 1.5COMP HOURS607 5.50 0.00 COMP TIME - INFORMALCOMP HOURS608 2.00 96.69 ACCREDITATION PAYMISCELLANEOUSacc 0.00 23.56 Accreditation 1% Part TimeMISCELLANEOUSacp 0.00 0.00 ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORTMISCELLANEOUSacs 0.00 161.90 BOC II CertificationMISCELLANEOUSboc 0.00 81.17 09/17/2014 Page 1 of 2 Packet Page 148 of 349 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 673 (09/01/2014 to 09/15/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description Repayment AgreementREGULAR HOURScell 0.00 -60.96 Collision ReconstructionistMISCELLANEOUScolre 0.00 135.29 TRAINING CORPORALMISCELLANEOUScpl 0.00 140.18 CERTIFICATION III PAYMISCELLANEOUScrt 0.00 516.16 DETECTIVE PAYMISCELLANEOUSdet 0.00 195.60 Detective 4%MISCELLANEOUSdet4 0.00 942.14 EDUCATION PAY 2%EDUCATION PAYed1 0.00 826.41 EDUCATION PAY 4%EDUCATION PAYed2 0.00 700.90 EDUCATION PAY 6%EDUCATION PAYed3 0.00 4,360.95 FAMILY MEDICAL/SICKSICKfmls 80.00 2,330.45 HOLIDAYHOLIDAYhol 1,233.80 42,992.84 K-9 PAYMISCELLANEOUSk9 0.00 198.25 LONGEVITY PAY 2%LONGEVITYlg1 0.00 1,704.24 LONGEVITY PAY 4%LONGEVITY PAYlg2 0.00 1,136.71 LONGEVITY 6%LONGEVITY PAYlg3 0.00 5,168.73 Longevity 1%LONGEVITYlg4 0.00 331.43 Longevity 3%LONGEVITYlg5 0.00 137.65 Longevity .5%LONGEVITYlg6 0.00 324.65 Longevity 1.5%LONGEVITYlg7 0.00 688.03 MOTORCYCLE PAYMISCELLANEOUSmtc 0.00 195.60 Public Disclosure SpecialistMISCELLANEOUSpds 0.00 44.66 PHYSICAL FITNESS PAYMISCELLANEOUSphy 0.00 1,496.13 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SERGEANMISCELLANEOUSprof 0.00 149.96 SPECIAL DUTY PAY 5%MISCELLANEOUSsdp 0.00 494.56 ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANTMISCELLANEOUSsgt 0.00 149.96 SICK LEAVE ADD BACKSICKslw 106.45 0.00 TRAFFICMISCELLANEOUStraf 0.00 210.27 Total Net Pay:$462,311.23 $683,477.46 19,672.88 09/17/2014 Page 2 of 2 Packet Page 149 of 349 AM-7132 5. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:09/23/2014 Time:5 Minutes Submitted For:Edmonds Citizens' Tree Board Submitted By:Jana Spellman Department:City Council Committee: Type: Information Information Subject Title Arbor Day Proclamation Recommendation Previous Council Action Narrative Presentation of Arbor Day Proclamation. Attachments Arbor Day Proclamation Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 09/18/2014 09:12 AM Mayor Dave Earling 09/18/2014 09:13 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 09/18/2014 04:50 PM Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 09/09/2014 01:50 PM Final Approval Date: 09/18/2014 Packet Page 150 of 349 Proclamation City of Edmonds • Office of the Mayor Arbor Day 2014 WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees; and WHEREAS, the holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska; and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed throughout the Nation and the world; and WHEREAS, Arbor Day is now observed in eighty-two communities throughout Washington State; and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our pervious topsoil by wind and water, lower our heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce oxygen and provide habitat for wildlife; and WHEREAS, trees are a renewable resource giving us paper, wood for our homes, fuel for our fires and countless other wood products; and WHEREAS, trees in our city increase our property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas, and beautify our community; and WHEREAS, trees, wherever they are planted, are a source of joy and spiritual renewal; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that I, David O. Earling, Mayor, do hereby proclaim October 4, 2014 ARBOR DAY IN EDMONDS and urge all citizens to recognize and applaud the contributions of our State’s greatest natural resource. David O. Earling, Mayor September 23, 2014 Packet Page 151 of 349 AM-7154 7. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:09/23/2014 Time:15 Minutes Submitted By:Frances Chapin Department:Parks and Recreation Committee: Type: Information Information Subject Title Update on Edmonds Arts Commission temporary art projects on 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Recommendation For information only. Previous Council Action Narrative The 4th Avenue temporary art project is an implementation of the 2014 adopted Community Cultural Plan Goal 1.4, to advance the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor through short-term projects. The project is lead by the Edmonds Arts Commission (EAC) and community partners including the Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation. Retaining the big concepts of the 2009 4th Avenue Plan, the temporary art projects will highlight this unique corridor in downtown Edmonds as the major pedestrian connection between the vibrant activity center of Edmonds Center for the Arts and the downtown retail center surrounding Main Street. The unique character of this corridor is as a neighborhood, as a link for economic activity in the downtown, and as a regional asset for economic development and cultural history. The Arts Commission has convened two meetings of a stakeholder/advisory committee including residents, property owners, and businesses on the corridor. The design process to create a cohesive design for a variety of temporary art elements on the corridor will be facilitated by EAC. The goal is to have some elements implemented during the good weather window which generally ends in mid-October or in the spring of 2015. EAC discussed the project report (attached) at their August 4 meeting and supports moving this project forward. Attachments 4th Ave Temporary Art Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Parks and Recreation Carrie Hite 09/17/2014 02:48 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 09/17/2014 02:50 PM Mayor Dave Earling 09/18/2014 09:14 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 09/18/2014 04:50 PM Form Started By: Frances Chapin Started On: 09/17/2014 02:31 PM Final Approval Date: 09/18/2014 Packet Page 152 of 349 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor: Temporary Art and Enhancements A project plan for multiple elements/components with phased installation City of Edmonds Arts Commission and Community Partners, August 2014 INTRODUCTION The narrow street connecting the Edmonds Center for the Arts to the downtown retail area at Main Street has long been considered a unique and special part of the heart of Edmonds. A commercial center in the early years of Edmonds history, the intersection of Main Street and 4th Avenue North still is home to a variety of historic buildings and leading north on 4th are homes typical of the early town, anchored at the north end by the original high school campus, part of which remains as the Edmonds Center for the Arts. A popular viewpoint for walkers at the intersection of Edmonds and 4th is included as part of the corridor. For the past ten years the community has in various ways (zoning change, 2009 plan, Stages of History tour, etc.) identified this corridor as a special place in the downtown, with the vision of making it a “great” place. “…a great place makes everyone–resident, worker, visitor–feel welcome. It gives people an opportunity to learn about each other through observation, and through casual interaction. Great places have a visceral effect; they cause us to pay closer attention to the world around us.” (Placemaking, 2014) Interest in moving ahead with short term or interim projects to highlight the 4th Avenue corridor, such as temporary art installations, was a priority expressed during the 2013-14 Community Cultural Plan and Parks PROS Plan process. The recent installation of eight Stages of History artist-made interpretive panels on 4th Avenue is one step that has been implemented. As an initial step in exploring other ideas the EAC and Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation jointly funded a study of potential low cost options by Seattle artist Benson Shaw. On June 2 and July 7 the EAC discussed the goal of creating an integrated design for the corridor and approved moving ahead to convene a stakeholders meeting. On July 14 the EAC convened a Stakeholders meeting, inviting businesses, property owners and residents along the corridor to attend. A group of 14 stakeholders met on July 14 at the Edmonds Conference Center to discuss the overall concepts presented by Benson Shaw. The main concepts were decorative crosswalks, sidewalk graphics, small lighting elements, parklet (surface treatment park in public right of way), a variety of vertical design/color elements, and suggestions for both resident/property owner options. Attendees reviewed potential project elements, prioritized areas of interest, discussed process and established an initial advisory group. The stakeholder advisory group met again on July 21. Building on ideas presented at the first meeting, potential projects, project phasing, and support for various temporary treatments as part of an integrated design for temporary art on the corridor were discussed and prioritized. Examples of cross walk treatments and lighting were reviewed. The group recommended refining the goals and preparing a proposed plan for consideration by the Edmonds Arts Commission at their August 4 meeting. An initial review of proposed temporary art elements has been made with both Parks Maintenance and Public Works staff. Packet Page 153 of 349 PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR INTEGRATED TEMPORARY ART ELEMENTS The plan includes specific areas of interest and potential phasing for implementation. In addition, options for funding are explored with a 2014-15 implementation timeline. CORRIDOR COMPONENTS: The vision is to create an integrated and cohesive project including design elements that mark the path and encourage pedestrian movement back and forth between the ECA and Main Street. As identified in the 2009 plan the corridor varies in character, with four distinctive sections including the commercial “living room” area adjacent to Main Street, the primarily residential section north of Bell, the water and sunset view site at the intersection of Edmonds and 4th, and the ECA campus at the north end. The view site was identified in the 2009 plan as a small park and in the proposed interim installations this is defined as a surface treatment “parklet” which creates a park space without major infrastructure investments. An integrated design for the corridor might include distinctive treatments in each of the street sections, as well as the parklet. 1. Decorative crosswalks – There are three intersections along the corridor (Bell, Edmonds, and Daley) identified for decorative crosswalk treatment. The intersection at 4th and Main has paver crosswalks. Materials – torch down materials, standard for cross walks, longer life, able to maintain. Designs – no more than two or three colors, meet traffic safety standards, simple, prefer 4-way treatments. Consider designs that emphasize north/south movement on corridor while still indicating safe crossing east/west – e.g. one additional color on corridor but same design throughout. Consensus that relatively simple, geometric or simple graphic designs most effective and in keeping with nature of corridor. 2. Sidewalk treatments – Sidewalk treatments may vary along the corridor: design elements in the commercial block between Bell and Main potentially will have a different character, and the entry intersection to ECA might also be enhanced in a unique way. Materials - could include torch down and possibly lighting elements. Designs - graphics, color and form, scattered, not solid. Consider stenciled words, with staining pattern around words on periodic sidewalk panels throughout corridor. Words could change from one block to the next – e.g. literary, performance and visual art names or features. 3. Lighting – Goal is to create a visual “path” north-south on the corridor. Products - interest in 3” round LED solar imbedded lights which could be core drilled and set into existing sidewalks. Design – integrate with sidewalk graphic, use to “light the path” going north/south. Could be scattered along the corridor. 4. Vertical elements – Goal is to create periodic vertical visual elements to highlight the north-south connection. Existing verticals include older flower basket poles near Main, parking sign poles, and the new Stages of History plaques (8 between Main and the ECA). Materials – possibly cut metal, color, forms that could be added as finial to existing parking sign poles. Painted or black poles might replace existing poles to match the new City standard of Packet Page 154 of 349 black powder coated poles on the redone section of Main St. From Main to Bell encourage replacement of existing flower basket poles with art enhanced flower poles and possibly adding two more. 5. Optional menu - suggestions for private property including funding element Materials – rope lighting, color tape etc. 6. Parklet at Edmonds and 4th Ave – Base design defined in conjunction with corridor design process. Further design process in 2015. PHASED IMPLEMENTATION • Phase 1: create a cohesive artist design for corridor elements; explore funding options (goal 2014). • Phase 2: implement cross walk designs and possibly sidewalk treatments including lights (goal 2014). • Phase 3: implement remaining cross walk and sidewalk treatments and vertical elements. • Phase 4: parklet component to be fully designed separately in 2015, although base design could or should be part of initial artist concepts. For example, the artist may work to establish a footprint of the area, specifying surface (torch down) design in conjunction with the cross walk design at that intersection. The parklet should be part of the 2015 Parks Department work plan, with a final design process involving City staff and possibly other community partners such as the garden club. DESIGN PROCESS Arts Commission contract with 2 or 3 invited artists to prepare design proposals for corridor. • Guidelines for Artists: E.g. Design should (1) reflect Edmonds as arts community and/or the neighborhood, (2) be a quality design, and (3) specify elements with a 5 year life minimum (assume maintenance) that meet City requirements, (4) specify quality materials (ex: torch-down process for crosswalks), (5) maintain the intent of the original 4th Avenue Corridor Plan (2009) to lead people north-south along the corridor. • Select preferred design through process similar to permanent public art selection process with representation from the EAC, advisory committee, City Council, and general public. • Contract with selected artist(s) to refine specific designs for fabrication and installation. • Final parklet design process referenced above. BUDGET – Estimate $38,000 – $52,000 total – public/private partnership Design: Edmonds Arts Commission – artist design fees budgeted in 2014 ($8 -12,000 total) Fabrication: Fabrication funding is anticipated to be from private sources including the Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation. The overall budget goal discussed to date is $30,000 to $40,000 for creation of crosswalks, light and graphic installation in sidewalks, and possibly vertical elements. All costs are TBD. In addition, the parklet would require labor assistance from the Parks Division and possibly some Parks beautification funding for planting elements. Packet Page 155 of 349 AM-7158 8. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:09/23/2014 Time:15 Minutes Submitted By:Shane Hope Department:Development Services Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Information Information Subject Title Presentation on Development Projects and Activities Recommendation Consider the information and have any discussion Previous Council Action N/A Narrative One of the roles of the Development Services Department is to provide assistance to people interested in improving or developing their property. Assistance includes discussions, data, hand-outs, permitting, and inspections. Attached is a set of slides (Exhibit 1) about some of the development activities and projects that are underway. At the September 23 meeting, staff will present the information. The intent is to proactively share highlights of development projects and activities in Edmonds. Attachments Exhibit 1: Development Activities Slides Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 09/18/2014 04:31 PM Mayor Dave Earling 09/18/2014 05:17 PM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 09/19/2014 08:04 AM Form Started By: Shane Hope Started On: 09/18/2014 04:00 PM Final Approval Date: 09/19/2014 Packet Page 156 of 349 DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS/ ACTIVITIES CITY COUNCIL MEETING – 09/23/14 Packet Page 157 of 349 Packet Page 158 of 349 Serving the Public with a Smile Packet Page 159 of 349 Packet Page 160 of 349 Inspections Field inspections are performed by Building Inspectors, Engineering Inspectors & Planning staff. Packet Page 161 of 349 Staff Meetings – Teamwork! Packet Page 162 of 349 Development Review Committee Meetings Staff providing pre-application assistance for development projects being planned Packet Page 163 of 349 Edmonds Development Activity Packet Page 164 of 349 Building Division 2014 Permits Issued through August TYPE OF PERMIT # ISSUED New Single Family 33 Duplex 0 Apartment/ Condo 0 Commercial 2 Mixed Use (Office/condo)1 Additions/ Alterations Single Family 60 Apartment/ Condo 9 Commercial 43 Other Mechanical/Plumbing 129/133 Demolition 15 Miscellaneous 270 TOTAL 804 Packet Page 165 of 349 Solar Panel Permits Packet Page 166 of 349 Engineering Permits For the period between 9/1/13 and 8/31/14 •Issued 591 Engineering permits •Total permit fees: $ 93,285.44 •Performed 1094 Inspections •Total inspection fees: $124,815.82 •Estimated Reviews: 1200 Packet Page 167 of 349 Packet Page 168 of 349 Current Development Projects 8,380 sf Home on Hanna Park Rd New Post Office Mixed Use Site Pineview Place Subdivision The Development Services Department currently has a total of 544 active issued building permits . Packet Page 169 of 349 Residential Development The Development Services Department currently has 52 active New Single Family Residence permits 2,929 sf SFR on Sunset Ave 4, 436 sf SFR on Sunset Ave 27 Lot Subdivision Packet Page 170 of 349 Swedish Hospital Garage New 3 Story Parking Garage 108,990 sf $8.4 Million in Valuation Completed June 2014 Packet Page 171 of 349 Swedish Hospital 94,117 sf Expansion - $28 Million in Valuation Packet Page 172 of 349 New Post Office Mixed Use Building 94,256 sf - 43 Residential Units - Post Office - Retail Space $7.2 Million in Valuation Packet Page 173 of 349 Community Health Clinic New 24,750 sf Medical & Dental Clinic $2.6 Million in Valuation Completed July 2014 Packet Page 174 of 349 Salish Crossing Complete remodel for 5 new tenant spaces & Museum Parking lot & pedestrian improvements Packet Page 175 of 349 Jacobsen’s Marine New 10,120 sf Marine Service Building - $810,000 in Valuation Packet Page 176 of 349 Prestige Care New 48,782 sf - Skilled Nursing Facility on 76th Ave W $6.9 Million in Valuation Packet Page 177 of 349 5th Avenue Animal Hospital 10,562 sf New Veterinary Clinic - $891,000 Valuation Packet Page 178 of 349 Transitioning to New Technology Packet Page 179 of 349 THANK YOU! Edmonds Development Services Packet Page 180 of 349 AM-7157 9. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:09/23/2014 Time:30 Minutes Submitted For:Rob English Submitted By:Megan Luttrell Department:Engineering Review Committee: Committee Action: Cancel Type: Information Information Subject Title Presentation and Discussion on the Capital Facilities Plan/Capital Improvement Program Process. Recommendation Previous Council Action Narrative The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is a document updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects are identified within the six-year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan projects which encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects. CIP vs. CFP The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City levels of service standards. The CFP is also required to be consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP. Attached are answers to questions that were forwarded to staff. Attachments Attachment 1 - CIP-CFP QA Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Robert English 09/18/2014 02:37 PM Public Works Phil Williams 09/19/2014 10:36 AM City Clerk Scott Passey 09/19/2014 10:44 AM Mayor Dave Earling 09/19/2014 10:46 AM Packet Page 181 of 349 Mayor Dave Earling 09/19/2014 10:46 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 09/19/2014 10:47 AM Form Started By: Robert English Started On: 09/18/2014 02:21 PM Final Approval Date: 09/19/2014 Packet Page 182 of 349 How are the CFP and CIP "created”? Each year, usually just ahead of the budget process, staff prepares a draft CIP and CFP for review and adoption as part of the annual budget. Engineering staff reviews the previous year’s CIP/CFP, the current 6-year Water, Sewer, and Stormwater comprehensive plans, the Transportation Improvement Program, the Parks, Recreation and Open Space plan (PROS Plan – done in conjunction with Edmonds’ Parks Department), the City’s Strategic Plan, the City’s overall Comprehensive Plan (and its embedded Transportation Element), and other relevant plans prior to preparing any modifications to the current CIP/CFP. Projects that are already on the CIP/CFP are updated with the most recent information available for scope, cost, available funding (if any), schedule, and phasing. Projects with little or no secured funding are placed into the last three years of the CIP/CFP six-year plans. Under the GMA, the financial plan must be “financially constrained” – i.e., reflecting likely available resources; this is especially true for the first three years of each plan, thereby ensuring the near term projects are funded or have a high likelihood. Once an initial draft has been prepared and vetted through all City Departments and the Mayor, it is generally scheduled for review by the Planning Board in a public meeting. Once the Planning Board recommendations have been reviewed and any appropriate changes made, the documents are scheduled for City Council consideration, public hearing(s), and adoption. Any recommended new projects appearing in either plan for the first time are specifically highlighted and discussed in more detail. This is true also where there has been a significant change in scope, a notable change in secured funding level, or any other major change in the project. These documents are not really “created” until they have been reviewed and approved by City Council for inclusion into the Budget document. Why isn’t the CIP more detailed like the CFP? Any detail staff has that it believes to be reliable regarding scope, budget, or secured funding is generally included in the CIP page for each project. For Parks projects, it is often easier to provide good visuals and descriptions than it is to provide graphics for sewer and water replacement projects. That said, if Council desires full-page descriptions for every project on the CIP/CFP, those could be prepared to achieve a more consistent look and feel to the printed document. It would require additional time and effort, of course, especially for the CIP. How can an item “suddenly” appear and what process can be created so that the Council may be aware of the "business decision”? We are not certain what is meant by a project “suddenly” appearing. Do you mean how and how fast might it first appear on the draft CIP/CFP? We will assume that is the question. If the question is a different one, we hope it can be asked again. Throughout the year, many different developments can take place that result in changes to the CIP/CFP. As more information is obtained about a project, the scope is refined, costs are adjusted, inflation estimated, grants and other funding sources are pursued, and schedules revised. That is an expected and continuous process. Sometimes new information is obtained requiring an entirely new project to be added to the CIP/CFP. This can happen for many reasons. Perhaps an on-going consultant study or a scheduled inspection of a City-owned building or utility reveals a significant defect not previously identified in one of our planning Packet Page 183 of 349 documents. Perhaps a new funding opportunity is created with a narrow application window and we don’t have a project on our list particularly well-packaged to compete for this new funding. There could be and have been many other changed circumstances like these that result in the need to add a new project. Depending on when this new information or changed condition occurs in relation to the timeline for CIP/CFP development, it could appear to have happened suddenly or deliberately. In any event, if a new project is proposed for addition to the CIP/CFP it will be vetted and approved by the City Council. If approved, the project will then be added to the CIP/CFP during the annual process to update the documents. In the overall scheme of things this does not seem particularly sudden but maybe we do not understand correctly the question being asked. It might be helpful if some specific examples could be used to provide a context. Why are some placeholders really unrealistic and how can we change them, if desired? There are many projects on the CIP/CFP, some of them potentially very large, about which we know very little. At some point in the past there was a desire to pursue a project and each year during this process we ask ourselves if the project or goal still has merit. These are typically projects that would need significant amounts of general governmental funding to complete and those funds have just not been available. The projects may not fit well into any federal or state funding programs, including planning and design opportunities. As a result there hasn’t been any new information generated to develop or refine a scope of work or produce a credible cost estimate. The Council can review these, weigh them with the help of the Public Hearing process, and add or remove them as they wish. How much control does the Council have in this process? The City Council has final control of what projects are and are not included. The CIP/CFP requires Council approval in the same way the annual budget does. Why is it updated at the end of the year only? It seems appropriate to formally update the CIP/CFP once each year as part of the budget. Staff is unaware of any cities that handle that element differently. The Engineering Division does prepare a Quarterly Project Update and takes it directly to the Council on the same frequency. This is always presented in open session and then placed on the City’s website. How do both documents inter-relate with the Comp Plan? Under state law, each local Comprehensive Plan (Capital Facilities Element) must contain “at least a six- year plan “ to finance needed capital facility projects. The types of projects and their locations must be identified in this plan, along with projected funding and the source of the funding. We generally call this the “Capital Facilities Plan” (CFP). It is basically a narrower version of the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). While the CIP is a long list of projects and their funding—including many maintenance projects, the CFP is a shorter list that does not include maintenance projects. Each year, the updated six-year CFP is adopted into the Comprehensive Plan, as required under the Growth Management Act (GMA). This update is considered during the latter part of the year, as part of the budget process. (Note: Under the GMA, a Comprehensive Plan can generally be amended no more than once per year; one of the few exceptions is for “the amendment of the capital facilities element of a comprehensive plan that occurs concurrently with the adoption or amendment of a county or city budget.”) Ultimately, the GMA requires each jurisdiction to “perform its activities and make capital budget decisions in conformity with its comprehensive plan.” Packet Page 184 of 349 AM-7156 10. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:09/23/2014 Time:60 Minutes Submitted By:Rob Chave Department:Planning Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Information Information Subject Title Study Session regarding the Planning Board's recommendation for proposed zoning changes to Westgate. Recommendation Direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance for City Council adoption. Previous Council Action Westgate planning and zoning issues have been discussed at past City Council meetings including: - 4 meetings in 2010 - 1 meetings in 2011 - 3 meetings in 2012 - 2 meetings in 2013 - 3 meetings in 2014 (including a public hearing) The 2014 meetings included: a) a briefing on the Westgate proposal on July 22; b) a public hearing on August 4; and c) additional discussion on August 26, 2014. Please refer to the August 4, 2014, and August 26, 2014 Council agenda items for further background. Narrative This is a follow-up discussion to the public hearing and Council discussion held in August on the Westgate code proposals recommended by the Planning Board. The Council discussion on August 26th touched on a number of subjects, mainly summarized in the attached presentation delivered that evening (Exhibit 3). The current draft of the Westgate Mixed Use Zone (Exhibit 1) is an update of the version discussed on August 26th; changes from the August 26th draft are indicated in underline/strikeout format; many of these involve language improvements resulting from discussion with the City Attorney while other modifications address some of the Council concerns raised. -- Further clarification and standardization of the open space provisions, especially making sure the requirements for open space and amenity space are separately delineated. For example, clarity is provided that open space cannot include balconies or other interior/under-building spaces, and any accessible rooftop decks or green roofs can only count for up to 50% of the required open space. Amenity Packet Page 185 of 349 space can't be located on a rooftop. -- A provision has been added to the Amenity Space section (page 33) specifying that " Qualifying amenity space shall be open to the air and located within six feet of the ground in order to provide some opportunity for variety and interest in public space while assuring easy accessibility for the public." The idea is to allow for some variety in public space (e.g. multi-level plazas connected by steps or amphitheater spaces) while assuring that the space is still accessible. -- A provision has been added to the Open Space section (page 34) specifying that "Qualifying open space shall be unobstructed and open to the air." -- Minor wordsmithing and edits reflecting City Attorney review. In some cases these are references or codification adjustments (ECDC references, table and section numbering) and in other cases providing more precise language. We noted during the Council discussion there may be an interest in having an interim 20-foot setback from SR-104 and 100th Ave W instead of the current 12-foot setback. If this is the Council's desire, the change could be accomplished by changing the following language found on page 4 of the draft code: B. Building setback along external streets. A building setback is required as follows: 12 feet from 100th Avenue W 12 feet from SR-104 During this meeting, staff will be presenting an outline of some of the questions/issues raised by Council to aid in the discussion. Attachments Exhibit 1: Updated Westgate draft code Exhibit 2: Green Factor Tools (adopted by reference) Exhibit 3: Staff presentation from 8/26/2014 Exhibit 4: Petso amendment proposals Exhibit 5: Westgate Questions Petso Bloom Staff Exhibit 6: Westgate Questions 9-15-14 Exhibit 7: Westgate Combined Transportation Memos Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 09/18/2014 04:00 PM Mayor Dave Earling 09/18/2014 05:17 PM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 09/19/2014 08:04 AM Form Started By: Rob Chave Started On: 09/18/2014 01:31 PM Final Approval Date: 09/19/2014 Packet Page 186 of 349 Code Changes to Implement Westgate Study (all new) 2 4 Chapter 16.110 WMU – Westgate Mixed Use Zone District 6 Sections: 16.110.000 Purposes. 8 16.110.010 Uses. 16.110.020 Site development standards. 10 16.110.030 Operating restrictions. 16.110.000 12 Purposes. The Westgate Mixed Use (WMU) zone has the following specific purposes in addition to 14 the general purposes for business and commercial zones listed in chapter 16.40 ECDC: A. Encourage mixed-use development, including offices and retail spaces in conjunction 16 with residential uses, in a walkable community center with a variety of amenity and open spaces. The intent is to establish a connection between neighborhoods; create a 18 desirable center for local residents, while being inviting to visitors; and unify the larger Westgate District with a distinctive character. 20 B. Create mixed-use walkable, compact development that is economically viable, attractive and community-friendly. 22 C. Improve connectedness for pedestrian and bicycle users. D. Prioritize amenity spaces for informal and organized gatherings. 24 E. Emphasize green building construction, stormwater infiltration, and a variety of green features. 26 F. Establish a flexible regulating system that creates quality public spaces by regulating building placement and form. 28 G. Ensure civic and private investments contribute to increased infrastructure capacity and benefit the surrounding neighborhoods and the community at large. 30 H. Encourage the development of a variety of housing choices available to residents of all economic and age segments. 32 Packet Page 187 of 349 16.110.010 Uses. 2 A. Table 16.110-1. 4 Permitted Uses WMU Commercial Uses Retail stores or sales A Offices A Service uses A Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or services X Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant or food service establishment that also provides an on-site retail outlet open to the public A Automobile sales and service C Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents A Printing, publishing and binding establishments A Public markets licensed pursuant to provisions in chapter 4.90 ECC A Residential Uses Single-family dwelling C Multiple dwelling unit(s) A Other Uses Bus stop shelters A Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 C Primary and high schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R) C Local public facilities, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 C Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 A Packet Page 188 of 349 Permitted Uses WMU Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use B Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this zone B Commercial parking lots C Wholesale uses X Hotels and motels A Amusement establishments C Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions X Drive-in businesses C Laboratories C Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a permitted use X Day-care centers A Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums C Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 A Zoos and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 C Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers C Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 C Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use D Aircraft landings as regulated by chapter 4.80 ECC X A = Permitted primary use 2 B = Permitted secondary use C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit 4 D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit X = Not permitted 6 For conditional uses listed in Table 16.110-1, the use may be permitted if the proposal meets the criteria for conditional uses found in chapter 20.05 ECDC, and all of the following 8 criteria are met: Packet Page 189 of 349 1. Access and Parking. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the sidewalk and/or adjoining commercial areas. 2 2. The use shall be landscaped and designed to be compatible with the pedestrian streetscape, as described in chapter 22.110 ECDC. 4 16.110.020 Site development standards. 6 A. Building and site development standards are further specified in chapter 22.110 ECDC. B. Building setback along external streets. A building setback is required as follows: 8 12 feet from 100th Avenue W 12 feet from SR-104 10 C. Setbacks and Screening from P- or R-zoned property. All buildings shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet from adjacent P- or R-zoned properties. The required setback from P- or 12 R-zoned property shall be permanently landscaped with trees and ground cover and permanently maintained by the owner of the WMU lot. A six-foot minimum height fence, 14 wall or solid hedge running the length of the setback shall be provided within the setback area. 16 D. Parking. Parking space requirements stated here prevail over parking space standards contained in ECDC 17.050. The specific parking requirements for the Westgate Mixed Use 18 zone are: 1. 1 space for every 500 square feet of leasable commercial space. 20 2. 1.2 spaces for every dwelling unit not exceeding 900 sq. ft. in livable area. 1.75 spaces for every dwelling unit over 900 sq. ft. in livable area. 22 Parking meeting the commercial parking requirements shall be open to the public throughout business operating hours. Shared parking may be provided per ECDC 20.030. 24 E. Satellite television antennas shall be regulated as set forth in ECDC 16.20.050. 16.110.030 26 Operating restrictions. A. Enclosed Building. All uses shall be carried on entirely within a completely enclosed 28 building, except: 1. Public utilities and parks and uses associated with amenity and open spaces such as 30 outdoor dining or recreation uses; 2. Off-street parking and loading areas, and commercial parking lots; 32 3. Drive-in businesses; 4. Plant nurseries; 34 5. Public markets; provided, that when located next to a single-family residential zone, the market shall be entirely within a completely enclosed building; 36 6. Limited outdoor display of merchandise meeting the criteria of chapter 17.65 ECDC; 7. Motorized and nonmotorized mobile vending units meeting the criteria of chapter 38 4.12 ECC. 40 B. NuisancesProperty Performance Standards. All uses shall comply with chapter 17.60 ECDC, Property Performance Standards. 42 Packet Page 190 of 349 Chapter 22.110 Design Standards for the 2 WMU – Westgate Mixed Use District Sections: 4 22.110.000 Purpose and Intent. 22.110.010 Building Types. 6 22.110.020 Frontage Types. 22.110.030 Green Building Construction and Housing 8 22.110.050 Circulation. 22.110.070 Amenity Space and Green Feature Types. 10 22.110.080 Public Space Standards. 22.110.090 Height Bonus 12 22.110.000 Purpose and Intent. The core concept for the Westgate Mixed Use District is to create a vibrant mixed-use 14 activity center that enhances the economic development of the city and provides housing as well as retail and office uses to meet the needs of all age groups. This Chapter seeks to retain 16 key features of the area, including protecting the large trees and green surrounding hillsides, while increasing walkability and gathering spaces, such as plazas and open spaces. Important 18 aspects of this Chapter include: • Protecting steep slopes is a key concept; 20 • Designing a landscape emphasis for the primary intersection; • Creating a lively pedestrian environment with wide sidewalks and requirements for 22 buildings to be placed close to the sidewalk; • Landscaping the plazas, open spaces, and parking areas with required landscaped open 24 space; • Promoting a sustainable low-impact development with a requirement for bioswales, rain 26 gardens, green roofs and other features to retain and infiltrate storm water; • Providing workforce housing and increasing residential uses including small-sized 28 dwelling units; • Providing options for non-motorized transportation linking new bike lanes into the city’s 30 larger system of bike lanes and extending sidewalks and pedestrian paths into the surrounding residential areas. 32 22.110.010 Building Types. 34 A. Properties in the Westgate District have varying height limits depending on location and topography as identified in ECDC 22.110.010.B and ECDC 22.110.090. Seven Building 36 Types are allowed in the Westgate District, as listed below: 1. Rowhouse – A series of two or more attached townhome apartments or condominiums 38 with entrances facing the street or public way. Packet Page 191 of 349 2. Courtyard - A cluster of apartment or condominium flats arranged to share one or more common courtyards. 2 3. Stacked Dwelling – A primarily residential building with the building massing predicated on horizontal repetition and vertical stacking of residential units and which 4 may include ancillary commercial uses (such as exercise or health facilities or convenience shopping or services) on the ground level. 6 4. Live-Work - An integrated residential and working space designed to accommodate joint residential and work activity uses. 8 5. Loft Mixed-Use - A building that has vertical stacking of units organized on lobby, corridor, and elevator access, with greater height per floor on one or more floors to 10 accommodate additional loft area within a unit. 6. Side Court Mixed-Use – A building with retail or service uses located on the ground 12 floor and office or residential uses above and including a side courtyard adjacent to the public realm. 14 7. Commercial Mixed-Use – A mixed-use building with retail and/or service uses on at least the ground floor, with additional commercial or residential uses above. 16 B. Building Height. Building heights are described in terms of stories. Regardless of the 18 number of stories specified, overall building heights in the Westgate Mixed Use zone cannot exceed 25 feet for a two-story building, 35 feet for a three-story building, or 45 feet for 20 buildings with four stories. Buildings may only include a fourth story if the building meets the criteria contained in section ECDC 22.110.090. Notwithstanding other methods of calculating 22 height elsewhere in the city, Building building height in the Westgate Mixed Use zone is established by the finished grade at the street front, so that buildings may not use adjoining 24 slopes to increase the average height of the building above the street front level. The following diagramFigure 22.110.010.B illustrates building height limits and step back 26 requirements for buildings in the Westgate Mixed Use zone. Unless otherwise specified, the height limit is three stories or 35 feet. 28 The only exception to these height limits is when a building contains an undivided retail space that is at least 15,000 square feet is size. When such a space is included on the ground 30 floor of a building (such as for a grocery or drug store), then the overall building height may be increased by 1 foot for each foot that the first floor height will be above exceeds 10 feet, up 32 to a total of no more than 5 feet, to accommodate the additional ceiling height needed to accommodate the large retail use, provided that the total height may be no more than 5 feet 34 above the maximum height otherwise allowed by this subsection. Upon qualifying for the added A building that has taken advantage of this additional height, may not have its the retail 36 space may not be subdivided below the 15,000 square foot minimum at any time during the building’s lifetime. 38 Packet Page 192 of 349 Figure 22.110.010.B Building Height Limits and Step-back Requirements 2 C. Building Locations. Setbacks established in section ECDC 16.110.020 describe the 4 minimum distances buildings must be placed from the SR-104 and 100th Avenue W rights-of- way. In general, buildings shall be located at or within 10 feet of the setback line so that the 6 buildings can relate to each other, not stand in isolation, and help to define the adjoining open space and amenity spaces that will surround them. However, eExceptions may be granted as 8 part of the design review process when it can be demonstrated that the proposed building development will achieve these connectivity and space-shaping goals more effectively by 10 allowing such an exception while also fitting into anin light of the established building and circulation pattern, provided that vehicle parking is shall not be located between the building 12 and the public street in any instance. D. Building Type Descriptions. The following describe the different building types and 14 include diagrams indicating where each building type is allowed. Note that where descriptions and standards refer to “street” this is intended to refer to either an external street or an internal 16 street or drive which provides secondary vehicular and pedestrian access within the overall development(s). 18 Each building type is allowed only within specified locations within the Westgate districtMixed Use zone, as shown in the following Building Type Location DiagramFigure 20 22.110.010.D. Allowed uses per floor are specified in Table 22.110.010.D. Most properties have an option for more than one building type. Multiple buildings are allowed per site, so 22 long as each building conforms with the building type locations specified in Figure 22.110.010.D. 24 Packet Page 193 of 349 Figure 22.110.010.D Building Type Locations 2 4 Packet Page 194 of 349 Table 22.110.010.D Table of general allowed uses by floor for each building type. 2 Building Type Residential Uses Office Uses Retail Rowhouse Any floor Not allowed Not allowed Courtyard Any floor Ground floor only Ground floor only Stacked Dwellings Any floor Ground floor only Ground floor only Live-Work Not ground floor1 Ground floor only Ground floor only Loft Mixed Use Not ground floor1 Any floor Any floor Side Court Mixed Use Not ground floor1 Any floor Ground floor only Commercial Mixed Use Not ground floor1 Not ground floor Any floor 1 “Not ground floor” means the use may locate on any floor other than the ground floor of a building. 4 Packet Page 195 of 349 1. Rowhouse 2 Rowhouse type diagram and allowed locations. 4 6 Description. A series of two or more attached dwellings with zero side yard setbacks located on a 8 qualifying lot in the Westgate District as shown in the Building Type Location DiagramFigure 22.110.010.D. 10 Access. The primary entrance to each dwelling shall be accessed directly from and face the external 12 street or sidewalk if feasible. Where dwellings are accessed from internal streets or circulation drives, then the primary entrance to each dwelling shall be accessed directly from and face the 14 internal street or circulation drive. Parking and services shall be accessed from an internal street or alley or tuck-under parking in a Mixed Type Development. Parking entrances are 16 allowed on an internal street if the garage entrance does not occupy more than one half the building frontage. 18 Amenity Space. Publicly accessible amenity space shall be provided as described in section 22.110.070 20 ECDC. Usable outdoor amenity space shall be provided in conjunction with and related to Packet Page 196 of 349 the dwelling units at no less than 15% of the lot area devoted to residential uses. The outdoor space shall be of a regular geometry so that the space is usable for recreational or leisure use. 2 Open Space • The minimum open space area shall be 15% of the lot area. Additional amenity space 4 provided in excess of the 15% minimum amenity space requirement may also count as open space. 6 • Open space may be public or private. Open space shall not include balconies or areas covered by or located under buildings, such as arcades. 8 • A roof deck or green roof may only count as open space if is accessible, and may not count toward more than 50% of the required open space. 10 • Private open space is allowed in courts, balconies and roof decks. • Protected slope areas may also count as open space. 12 Landscape. Landscape may be used to separate a front yard from the front yards of adjacent units or 14 buildings. Any front yard trees shall be of porch scale where adjacent to the porch (at maturity, no more than 15 feet tall) except at the margins of the lot and as a part of the 16 frontage landscaping at the street sidewalk interface, where they may be of house scale (no more than 30 feet tall at the maturity of the tree). In general, medium-to-large trees shall be 18 dispersed through the development (either new or existing trees) and landscaping provided for shade and privacy. 20 Building Design and Massing. Buildings on corner properties adjacent to streets shall be designed with a main façade and 22 a secondary façade to provide street frontage on all streets. In a 3 story building, a townhouse dwelling may be stacked over a ground floor flat. In this case, the flat shall be accessed by its 24 own front doors at the street and the townhouse dwelling shall be accessed by a separate front door and an internal stair. In a 2 story building, the rowhouse consists of a townhouse 26 dwelling that is accessed from the street and faces the street, or residential flats that each have a street entry. 28 Rowhouse buildings shall comply with the (1) Massing and Articulation, (3) Ground Level Details, and (5) Treating Blank Walls design treatments specified in section ECDC 30 22.110.015. 32 34 Packet Page 197 of 349 2. Courtyard 2 Courtyard type diagram and allowed locations. 4 6 Description. A cluster of dwelling units arranged in one or more buildings to share one or more common 8 courtyards. The individual units may be any combination of rowhouses or flats or stacked flats. The courtyard is private space that is adjacent to the public realm and may provide 10 access to tuck-under parking. Courtyard building types may house ground floor commercial/flex uses. 12 Access • The main entry to each ground floor dwelling shall be directly off a common courtyard or 14 directly from a street. Access to commercial uses shall be directly from a street. • Access to second-story units may be through an open or open roofed stair. 16 • Parking shall be accessed through an alley or interior street if present. Amenity Space. 18 Publicly accessible amenity space shall be provided as described in section ECDC 22.110.070. Sites shall be designed to provide usable amenity space with a total area of not 20 less than 15% of the lot. A central courtyard and / or multiple separated or interconnected courtyards, roof decks, green roofs, plazas and courtyards may be included in the cumulative 22 Packet Page 198 of 349 total area only if they are accessible to the public. In a project with multiple courtyards at least two of the courtyards shall conform to the patterns below: 2 • Optimal court dimensions are a minimum of 40 feet when the long axis of the court is oriented East/West and a minimum of 30 feet when the court is oriented North/South. 4 • In 40-foot wide courts, the frontages allowed within the applicable zone are permitted on two sides of the court; they are permitted on one side of a 30-foot wide court. 6 Open Space • The minimum open space area shall be 15% of the lot area. Additional amenity space 8 provided in excess of the 15% minimum amenity space requirement may also count as open space. 10 • Open space may be public or private. Open space shall not include balconies or areas covered by or located under buildings, such as arcades. 12 • A roof deck or green roof may only count as open space if is accessible, and may not count toward more than 50% of the required open space. 14 • Private open space is allowed in courts, balconies and roof decks. • Protected slope areas may also count as open space. 16 • Private open space is allowed in side and rear yard, courtyards, balconies and roof decks. • Courtyards shall be connected to the public way and/or to each other. Connecting spaces 18 shall be at least 10 feet wide. Landscape. 20 Landscape shall not be used to separate a front yard from the front yards on adjacent parcels. Front yard trees shall be of porch scale where adjacent to the porch (at tree’s 22 maturity, no more than 15 feet tall) except at the margins of the lot and as a part of the frontage landscaping at the street sidewalk interface, where they may be of house scale (no 24 more than 30 feet tall at the maturity of the tree). In general, medium-to-large trees shall be dispersed through the development (either new 26 or existing trees) and landscaping provided for shade and privacy. Building Design and Massing. 28 • Entrance doors and living spaces (great room, dining, living, family) should be oriented toward the courtyard and exterior street. Service rooms may be oriented toward the side-yard, 30 rear yard or alley. • No exterior arcade shall encroach into the required minimum width of the courtyard. 32 • Stoops up to 3 feet in height may be placed above below grade parking. Building size and massing. 34 • Buildings shall be composed of flats and rowhouses alone or in combination. • Units may be repetitive or unique in design. 36 • Buildings shall be composed of one, two, or three story masses, each using design features such as combinations of materials, windows or decorative details to suggest smaller-38 scale 30-foot-wide individual residential masses. • The building is not required to appear to be one building. 40 Courtyard buildings shall comply with the (1) Massing and Articulation, (2) Orientation to Street, (3) Ground Level Details, and (5) Treating Blank Walls design treatments specified in 42 section ECDC 22.110.015. 44 Packet Page 199 of 349 3. Stacked dwellings 2 Stacked dwellings type diagram and allowed locations. 4 6 Description Stacked Dwellings are predicated on horizontal repetition and vertical stacking of units 8 organized on lobby, corridor, and stairs or elevator access. These buildings may be used for ancillary non-residential commercial uses (such as exercise or health facilities or convenience 10 shopping or services) on the ground level only. Access 12 • The primary entrance to each dwelling shall be accessed through a lobby accessible from the street. 14 • Interior circulation to each unit shall be through a double or single loaded corridor. Amenity space. 16 Publicly accessible amenity space shall be provided as described in section ECDC 22.110.070. The primary shared open space is the rear yard, which shall be designed as a 18 courtyard. The rear yard may be designed for ground installation or as the lid of a below- grade parking garage. Side yards are allowed for common use gardens. 20 Packet Page 200 of 349 Sites shall be designed to provide usable open space with a total area of 15% of the lot. Central courtyards, roof decks, green roofs, plaza and courtyards may be included in the 2 cumulative total area. No arcade may encroach into the required minimum width of the courtyard. 4 In a project with multiple courts, at least two of the courts shall conform to the patterns below: 6 • Optimal court dimensions are a minimum of 40 feet wide when the long axis of the court is oriented East/West and a minimum of 30 feet wide when the court is oriented North/South. 8 • In 40-foot wide courts, the frontages allowed within the applicable zone are permitted on two sides of the court; they are permitted on one side of a 30-foot wide court. 10 • Private open space is allowed in side and rear yard, courts, balconies and roof decks. • Courts shall not be less than 1:1 between width and height. 12 • Private patios may be provided in side and rear yards. Open Space 14 • The minimum open space area shall be 15% of the lot area. Additional amenity space provided in excess of the 15% minimum amenity space requirement may also count as open 16 space. • Open space may be public or private. Open space shall not include balconies or areas 18 covered by or located under buildings, such as arcades. • A roof deck or green roof may only count as open space if is accessible, and may not 20 count toward more than 50% of the required open space. The primary shared open space is the rear yard, which shall be designed as a courtyard. The 22 rear yard may be designed for ground installation or as the lid of a below-grade parking garage. Side yards are allowed for common use gardens.• Private open space is allowed in 24 courts, balconies and roof decks. • Protected slope areas may also count as open space. 26 Landscape. Landscape may not be used to separate a front yard from the front yards on adjacent 28 parcels. Trees may be placed in front yards and in side yards to create a sense of place. In general, medium-to-large trees shall be dispersed through the development (either new 30 or existing trees) and landscaping provided for shade and privacy. Courtyards located over below grade garages shall be designed to avoid the sense of 32 planters and hardscape landscaping. Building Design and Massing. 34 Buildings shall be composed of flats, lofts, and rowhouses alone or in combination. • Units may be repetitive or unique in design. 36 • Buildings shall be composed of individual masses that are intended to break up the building into identifiable housing units rather than large undifferentiated blocks. The building 38 is not required to appear to be one building. Stacked dwelling buildings shall comply with the (1) Massing and Articulation, (3) Ground 40 Level Details, and (5) Treating Blank Walls design treatments specified in section ECDC 22.110.015. 42 44 Packet Page 201 of 349 4. Live-Work 2 Live-Work type diagram and allowed locations. 4 6 Description An integrated housing unit and working space occupied and utilized by a single household 8 in a structure, either single family units in clusters or a multi-family building, that has been designed to accommodate joint residential and work activity uses. Work uses shall be at the 10 ground floor. A live-work structure may be located on a qualifying lot in the Westgate District, as shown in the Building Type Location DiagramFigure 22.110.010.D. 12 Access The primary entrance to each ground floor work/flex space shall be accessed directly from 14 and face the external street or a sidewalk if feasible. Where dwellings are accessed from internal streets, then the primary entrance to each dwelling shall be accessed directly from and 16 face the internal street. Packet Page 202 of 349 The upstairs residential unit may be accessed by a separate entry and internal stair that is accessed from and faces the street. Access may also be provided by a shared lobby that 2 provides separate access to the commercial/flex and dwelling uses. Parking and services shall be accessed from an alley or tuck-under parking located under 4 the building. Parking entrances are allowed on an internal street or alley if the garage entrance does not occupy more than one half the building frontage. 6 Amenity Space Publicly accessible amenity space shall be provided as described in section ECDC 8 22.110.070. Front Yards are defined by the street and frontage type requirements of the zone. One usable outdoorAmenity space shall be provided behind the live-work at no less than 10 15% of the lot area and of a regular geometry with a minimum dimension of 20 feet. Where buildings back up to steep topography, the open space is not required to be usable. 12 Alternatively, 50% of the usable open spaceamenity space may be provided at the front of the lot. 14 Open Space • The minimum open space area shall be 15% of the lot area. Additional amenity space 16 provided in excess of the 15% minimum amenity space requirement may also count as open space. 18 • Open space may be public or private. Open space shall not include balconies or areas covered by or located under buildings, such as arcades. 20 • A roof deck or green roof may only count as open space if is accessible, and may not count toward more than 50% of the required open space. 22 • Private open space is allowed in courts, balconies and roof decks. • Protected slope areas may also count as open space. 24 Landscape Landscape shall not obscure the storefront of the ground floor flex/work space. 26 In general, medium-to-large trees shall be dispersed through the development (either new or existing trees) and landscaping provided for shade and privacy. 28 Frontage • Commercial/work/flex space and living areas shall be oriented toward the fronting street 30 or sidewalk. Service rooms should be oriented towards the side and rear yards. • Commercial/work/flex spaces shall conform to Shopfront Frontage Type Standards (see 32 ECDC 22.110.020). • Buildings on corner lots may provide an appropriate frontage type on each street front. 34 Building Design and Massing Live-work units may be designed as individual buildings composed of 2- and/or 3-story 36 volumes or included in larger buildings in compliance with the applicable building type requirements. 38 Live-Work buildings shall comply with the (1) Massing and Articulation, (3) Ground Level Details, and (5) Treating Blank Walls design treatments specified in section ECDC 40 22.110.015. 42 44 Packet Page 203 of 349 5. Loft Mixed-Use 2 Loft Mixed-Use type diagram and allowed locations. 4 6 Description Loft Mixed Use buildings are predicated on horizontal repetition and vertical stacking of 8 units organized on lobby, corridor, and stairs or elevator access. These buildings have greater height on at least one floor to accommodate additional floor loft area within a unit. These 10 buildings may be used for residential, office, and commercial uses, except that residential units may not be located on the ground floor. 12 Access • The primary entrance to each unit may be accessed be through a street level or elevated 14 lobby accessible from the street. • The entry to each ground floor unit may be through an elevator/stair corridor. 16 • Interior circulation to each unit shall be through a double or single loaded corridor. • Access to upper level loft areas is via an internal stair. 18 Packet Page 204 of 349 Amenity space. Publicly accessible amenity space shall be provided as described in section ECDC 2 22.110.070. Open Space 4 • The minimum open space area shall be 15% of the lot area. Additional amenity space provided in excess of the 15% minimum amenity space requirement may also count as open 6 space. • Open space may be public or private. Open space shall not include balconies or areas 8 covered by or located under buildings, such as arcades. • A roof deck or green roof may only count as open space if is accessible, and may not 10 count toward more than 50% of the required open space. • Protected slope areas may also count as open space. 12 • The primary shared open space is the rear yard. The yard may be designed for ground installation or for the lid of a below grade parking garage or garage deck. Side yards are 14 allowed for common use gardens. In a project with multiple courtyards at least two of the courtyards shall conform to the 16 patterns below: • Optimal court dimensions are a minimum 40 feet wide when the long axis of the court is 18 oriented East/West and a minimum 30 feet wide when the court is oriented North/South. • In 40-foot wide courts, the frontages and architectural projections allowed within the 20 applicable zone are permitted on two sides of the court; they are permitted on one side of a 30-foot wide court. 22 • Private open space is allowed in side and rear yard, courtyards, balconies and roof decks. • Private patios may be provided in side and rear yards. 24 • Central courtyards, roof decks, green roofs, plaza and courtyards may be included in the cumulative total open space area. 26 • No arcade may encroach into the required minimum width of a courtyard. Landscape 28 Landscape may not be used to separate a front yard from front yards on adjacent parcels. Trees may be placed in front yards and in side yards to create a sense of place. 30 Courtyards located over below grade garages shall be designed to provide a combination of integrated landscaping and seating/active circulation areas. 32 In general, medium-to-large trees shall be dispersed through the development (either new or existing trees) and landscaping provided for shade and privacy. 34 Building Design and Massing. Lofts may be provided as part of commercial or residential units, but must be provided on 36 at least one floor of the building. Units may be repetitive or unique in design. • Buildings shall be composed of one, two, or three story masses, each designed to loft 38 scale. • The main volume may be flanked by a secondary volume. 40 Loft Mixed Use buildings shall comply with the (1) Massing and Articulation, (2) Orientation to Street, (3) Ground Level Details, (4) Pedestrian Façade, and (5) Treating Blank 42 Walls design treatments specified in section ECDC 22.110.015. 44 Packet Page 205 of 349 6. Side Court Mixed-Use 2 Side Court Mixed-Use type diagram and allowed locations. 4 6 Description A single or cluster of buildings containing a mix of uses, including commercial as well as 8 dwelling units or office suites arranged to share one or more common courtyards. The individual units or suites are rowhouses, flats or stacked flats. The side courtyard is a semi-10 public space that is adjacent to the public realm. Side courtyard building types shall house ground floor commercial spaces with office or dwelling units above. Side court buildings may 12 be located on a qualifying lot in the Westgate District, as shown in the Building Type Location DiagramFigure 22.110.010.D. 14 Access • The main entry to each ground floor dwelling shall be directly off the common courtyard 16 or directly from an external street or sidewalk. Access to commercial and office uses may be directly from an external street, sidewalk, or side courtyard. 18 • Access to second-story units or suites shall be through an open, open roofed, or internal stair. 20 • Parking shall be accessed through an alley, internal circulation drive, or shared driveway access. Parking shall not be accessed directly from the exterior street via individual driveways 22 Packet Page 206 of 349 • Parking entrances to below grade garages and driveways should be located as close as possible to the side or rear of each lot. 2 • Entrance doors and living spaces (great room, dining, living, family) shall be oriented toward the courtyard and/or exterior street or sidewalk. Service rooms may be oriented toward 4 the side-yard, rear yard or alley. Amenity space. 6 Publicly accessible amenity space shall be provided as described in section ECDC 22.110.070. Courtyard buildings shall be designed to provide a side courtyard and or multiple 8 separated or interconnected courtyards with a minimum dimension of 20 feet and comprising at least 15% of the lot area. No exterior arcade may encroach into the required minimum 10 width of the side courtyard. In a project with multiple courtyards at least two of the courtyards shall conform to the 12 patterns below: • Dwellings shall face a side yard or courtyard. 14 • Major ground floor rooms shall be open to the active side yard with large windows and doors. 16 • When located on a side yard, a driveway shall be integrated into the design of the yard through the use of a reduced paved area, permeable paving materials for a landscaped area 18 and usable outdoor space. • Rear yards are not required. 20 Open Space • The minimum open space area shall be 15% of the lot area. Additional amenity space 22 provided in excess of the 15% minimum amenity space requirement may also count as open space. 24 • Open space may be public or private. Open space shall not include balconies or areas covered by or located under buildings, such as arcades. 26 • A roof deck or green roof may only count as open space if is accessible, and may not count toward more than 50% of the required open space. 28 • Private open space is allowed in courts, balconies and roof decks. • Protected slope areas may also count as open space. 30 Landscape Landscape shall not be used to separate a front yard from the front yards on adjacent 32 parcels. Front yard trees shall be of porch scale where adjacent to the porch (at tree’s maturity, no more than 15 feet tall) except at the margins of the lot and as a part of the 34 frontage landscaping at the street sidewalk interface, where they may be of house scale (no more than 30 feet tall at the maturity of the tree). 36 In general, medium-to-large trees shall be dispersed through the development (either new or existing trees) and landscaping provided for shade and privacy. 38 Building Design and Massing • The building elevation abutting an inactive side yard shall be designed to provide at least 40 one horizontal break of at least three feet and one vertical break. • Buildings on corner lots shall be designed with two facades using similar scale and design 42 features without the use of blank walls. • Units within the buildings may be flats and/or townhouses. 44 Packet Page 207 of 349 Side Court Mixed Use buildings shall comply with the (1) Massing and Articulation, (2) Orientation to Street, (3) Ground Level Details, (4) Pedestrian Façade, and (5) Treating Blank 2 Walls design treatments specified in section ECDC 22.110.015. Packet Page 208 of 349 7. Commercial Mixed-Use 2 Commercial Mixed-Use type diagram and allowed locations. 4 6 Description Commercial Mixed Use buildings are designed for retail and service uses on the ground 8 floor, with upper floors configured for dwelling units or commercial uses. The buildings are predicated on vertical stacking of units organized on lobby, corridor, and stairs or elevator 10 access. These buildings are located on a qualifying lot in the Westgate District, as shown in the Building Type Location DiagramFigure 22.110.010.D. 12 Access • The primary entrance to each building shall be accessed through a street level lobby or 14 elevated lobby accessible from the street or sidewalk. • Interior circulation to each unit shall be through a double or single loaded corridor. 16 • The entry to each ground floor commercial space shall be directly from and face the street or sidewalk. 18 Packet Page 209 of 349 Amenity space. Publicly accessible amenity space shall be provided as described in section ECDC 2 22.110.070. Shared amenity space may include the lid of a below grade parking garage or garage deck as long as the amenity space is within six feet of finished grade. Side yards or 4 courts are allowed for common use gardens. In a project with multiple amenity space areas at least two of the courts shall conform to the patterns below: 6 • Optimal amenity space area dimensions are a minimum 40 feet wide when the long axis of the court is oriented East/West and a minimum of 30 feet wide when the court is oriented 8 North/South. No arcade may encroach into the required minimum width of a courtyard. • In 40-foot wide courts, the frontages and architectural projections allowed within the 10 applicable zone are permitted on two sides of the court; they are permitted on one side of a 30-foot wide court. 12 Open Space • The minimum open space area shall be 15% of the lot area. Additional amenity space 14 provided in excess of the 15% minimum amenity space requirement may also count as open space. 16 • Open space may be public or private. Open space shall not include balconies or areas covered by or located under buildings, such as arcades. A roof deck or green roof may only be 18 counted as open space if it is accessible. • Protected slope areas may also count as open space. 20 Side yards or courts are allowed for common use gardens. • Private open space is allowed in side and rear yard, courts, balconies and roof decks. 22 • Private patios may be provided in side and rear yards. • Central courtyards, roof decks, green roofs, plazas and courtyards may be included in the 24 cumulative total open space area. Landscape 26 Private landscaping is required. Trees may be placed in front yards and in side yards to create a sense of place. 28 Open space areas located over below-grade garages shall be designed to avoid the sense of planters and hardscape landscaping. In general, medium-to-large trees shall be dispersed 30 through the development (either new or existing trees) and landscaping provided for shade and privacy. 32 Building Design and Massing Buildings shall be composed of office, retail, flats, or lofts alone or above commercial 34 space on the ground level. Units may be repetitive or unique in design. • The main volume may be flanked by one or more secondary volumes. 36 • Large floor plate retail such as grocery stores, drug stores, nurseries, and exercise gyms are encouraged and are allowed on the first or second floors of a mixed-use building. 38 Commercial Mixed Use buildings shall comply with the (1) Massing and Articulation, (2) Orientation to Street, (3) Ground Level Details, (4) Pedestrian Façade, and (5) Treating Blank 40 Walls design treatments specified in section ECDC 22.110.015. 42 Packet Page 210 of 349 22.110.015 Design Treatments A. Purpose 2 This Section describes building design features that are referenced as being required in the building types described in section ECDC 22.110.010. 4 1. Massing and Articulation 6 Intent: To reduce the massiveness and bulk of large box-like buildings, and articulate the 8 building form to a pedestrian scale. Buildings shall convey a visually distinct base 10 and top. A “base” can be emphasized by a different masonry pattern, more architectural 12 detail, visible plinth above which the wall rises, storefront, canopies, or a combination. The top 14 edge is highlighted by a prominent cornice, projecting parapet or other architectural element 16 that creates a shadow line. Where a single building façade exceeds 60 feet 18 in length, use a change in design features (such as a combination of materials, windows or decorative details) to articulate the building so that it appears to consist of multiple smaller-20 scale building segments. 22 2. Orientation to Street Intent: To reinforce pedestrian activity and 24 orientation and enhance the liveliness of the street through building design. 26 Building frontages shall be primarily oriented to the adjacent street, rather than to a parking lot or 28 alley. Ground floor commercial space shall be accessible and within an height elevation of 7” from 30 the adjoining sidewalk. Entrances to buildings shall be visible from the street and shall be given a 32 visually distinct architectural expression by one or more of the following elements: 34 a. Higher bay(s); b. Recessed entry (recessed at least three feet); 36 c. Forecourt and entrance plaza. 38 Packet Page 211 of 349 3. Ground Level Details Intent: To reinforce the character of the streetscape 2 by encouraging the greatest amount of visual interest along the ground level of buildings facing pedestrian 4 streets. Ground-floor, street-facing facades of commercial and mixed-use buildings shall incorporate 6 at least five of the following elements: a. Lighting or hanging baskets supported by 8 ornamental brackets; b. Medallions; 10 c. Belt courses; d. Plinths for columns; 12 e. Bulkhead for storefront window; f. Projecting sills; 14 g. Tile work; h. Transom or clerestory windows; 16 i. Planter box; j. An element not listed here, as approved, but that 18 is of a similar character and meets the intent. 20 4. Pedestrian Façade Intent: To provide visual connection between activities inside and outside the building. The 22 ground level facades of buildings that face a designated street front shall have transparent windows covering a minimum of 40 percent of the building ground floor façade that lies 24 between an average of two feet and 10 feet above grade. To qualify as transparent, windows shall not be mirrored or consist of darkly tinted glass, or prohibit visibility between the street 26 and interior. 28 5. Treating Blank Walls Intent. To ensure that buildings do not display blank, unattractive walls. Walls or portions 30 of walls on abutting streets or visible from residential areas where windows are not provided shall have architectural treatment. At least five of the following elements shall be 32 incorporated into any ground floor, street-facing facade: a. Masonry (except for flat, nondecorative concrete block); 34 b. Concrete or masonry plinth at the base of the wall; c. Belt courses of a different texture and color; 36 d. Projecting cornice; e. Decorative tile work; 38 f. Medallions; g. Opaque or translucent glass; 40 h. Artwork or wall graphics; i. Lighting fixtures; 42 j. Green walls; k. An architectural element not listed above, as approved, that meets the intent. 44 Packet Page 212 of 349 22.110.020 Frontage Types. 2 A. Purpose This Section defines how the buildings within the Westgate Mixed Use zone relate to the 4 public realm of the sidewalk and other common use areas. The purpose of defining Frontage Types is to encourage the development of a variety of frontage types and to encourage each 6 building to relate to the public realm in ways that are attractive, inviting, and accessible to all. B. Principles and Standards 8 The frontage types for each proposed development shall be designed in concert with the Building Types and standards presented in sections 22.110.010. 10 Primary frontage. “Primary frontage” is frontage that faces main public spaces or circulation areas of higher pedestrian importance. Entrances are required. Examples are street 12 fronts or interior access drives that link developments. Secondary frontage. “Secondary frontage” is frontage that faces areas of lesser pedestrian 14 importance. Entrances to buildings are not required. Examples include SR-104 when an alternative interior drive or pedestrian walkway is able to provide linkage to other 16 developments and pedestrian connections within the overall developed area or Westgate quadrant. 18 This section identifies five Frontage Types for primary and secondary frontages, as shown in the figure on the next page. Each of the five frontage types are described and depicted in a 20 section view. For each Frontage Type, the description concludes by identifying those Building Types for which that Frontage Type is permitted. For secondary frontages (permitted along 22 portions of SR 104, for example), no building entrance is required and the frontage types do not apply. Frontages for retail uses are required to provide windows facing the public street, 24 circulation drive, or sidewalk, glazed with clear glass and occupying no less than 60% of the ground-level frontage. 26 Packet Page 213 of 349 In general, entries to ground floor commercial space shall be directly from and face the related primary frontage. Additional entries may be provided, for example from parking or 2 secondary frontages. Blank walls are not permitted. 4 6 8 10 a. Terrace or Elevated Entry: The main façade is set back from the frontage line by an 12 elevated terrace or entry. This type buffers residential use from sidewalks. The elevated terrace is also suitable for outdoor cafes. Terrace or Elevated Entry frontage 14 is allowed on all building types. 16 b. Forecourt: The main façade is at the building line with with a portion set back for a 18 small court space. The court could be used to provide shopping or restaurant seating in commercial buildings, or as an entry court for residential uses. This type should be 20 used sparingly. Forecourt frontage may be used on Courtyard, Stacked Dwellings, and Live-Work building types. 22 c. Stoop: The main façade is near the frontage line with the first story elevated to 24 provide privacy. The stoop is appropriate for ground floor residential uses. Stoop frontage may be used on Rowhouse, Courtyard, Live-Work and Stacked Dwellings 26 building types. 28 d. Shopfront: The main façade is aligned close to the frontage line with the building 30 entrance at sidewalk grade. The covering shall extend far enough to provide pedestrians protection from the weather. This type is appropriate for retail or office 32 uses. Shopfront frontage may be used on Stacked Dwellings, Live-Work, Loft Mixed- Use, Side Court Mixed-Use, or Commercial Mixed-Use building types. 34 e. Gallery (or arcade): The main façade is set back from the frontage line with an 36 attached cantilevered colonnade overlapping the sidewalk. The entry should be at sidewalk grade. The gallery/arcade should be no less than 8’ wide. This type is 38 appropriate for retail or office uses. Gallery/arcade frontage may be used on Stacked Dwellings, Live-Work, Loft Mixed-Use, Side Court Mixed-Use, or Commercial Mixed-40 Use building types. 42 22.110.030 Green Building Construction and Housing. A. Purpose 44 The purpose of this Section is to encourage the development of a variety of housing choices available to residents of all economic segments and to encourage sustainable development 46 through the use of development standards, requirements and incentives. B. Green Building and Site Design Criteria 48 All development in the Westgate District shall meet Built Green 1-to-3 star or LEED Certified rating or equivalent as a requirement and shall meet a minimum Green Factor Score 50 of 0.3. Packet Page 214 of 349 C. Sustainable site design. All development shall meet Built Green 1-to-3 star or LEED Certified standards, or an 2 equivalent. Green Factor Score requirements shall be used in the design of sustainable site features and low-impact stormwater treatment systems. A Green Factor Score of 0.3 is 4 required of all developments (see ECDC 22.110.070). Pervious surfaces shall be integrated into site design and may include: pervious pavement, 6 pervious pavers and vegetated roofs. Capture and reuse strategies including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns may be substituted for the effective area of pervious surface 8 required. Runoff generated on–site shall be routed through a treatment system such as a structured 10 stormwater planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement, or cisterns. Runoff leaving the site shall conform to City of Edmonds Stormwater Management Code chapter 18.30 ECDC of 12 the City of Edmonds Municipal Code. 14 D. Housing. To promote a balance in age demographics and encourage age diversity, the City of 16 Edmonds is actively encouraging a greater number of dwelling units targeting young professionals and young workers through workforce housing provisions. The Westgate Mixed 18 Use District requires that at least 10% of residential units shall be very small units designed for affordable workforce housing (under 900 square feet) and that not more than 10% of all 20 dwelling units may exceed 1,600 square feet in size. 22 22.110.050 Circulation and parking. A. Alternative transportation. 24 The goals of the Westgate Mixed Use District include improving connectedness for pedestrian and bicycle users. Developers of private property within Westgate shall support the 26 pedestrian and bicycle use of the District by providing: • Internal circulation systems for both bicyclists and pedestrians within the property, 28 • Connections to off-site systems in the public right-of-way and on adjacent properties, • Bicycle racks and other supportive facilities, and 30 • Connections to bus stops and transit routes. B. Internal circulation drives. 32 The concept for an Internal Circulation drive is that of a shared street. This concept is intended to provide access to new residential developments, new and existing businesses, and 34 provide pedestrian connectivity and to reduce the impact of local traffic movement on surrounding arterial streets. 36 Thoroughfare Type: shared street Movement: yield 38 Design Speed: 10 mph Traffic Lanes: 10 feet 40 Parking: none Curb to Curb Distance: no curbs 42 Sidewalks: 6 feet 44 Packet Page 215 of 349 Sample street section for internal circulation drive. 2 C. Parking 4 The Westgate District parking standards are intended to reinforce that the area is pedestrian-oriented and intended to be equally accessible by people on foot, in wheelchairs, 6 on bicycles, or travelling by motorized vehicles. These standards strive to: (a) maximize a compatible mix of parking and pedestrian circulation; and 8 (b) encourage the development of shared parking; and (c) promote density and diversity of the built environment. 10 Design standards for parking lots include the following: (a) No parcel shall be used principally as a parking lot unless it provides centralized 12 parking for the larger developed area framed by external streets (e.g. a parking garage). (b) The edge of any surface parking lot shall be planted with shrubs or street trees, planted 14 at an average distance not to exceed thirty (30) feet on center and aligned three (3) to seven (7) feet behind the common lot line. This requirement may be reduced for parking lot edges 16 abutting parking on adjacent lots, when parking lots are linked by vehicular and pedestrian connections (see item (f) below). 18 (c) Plantings designed to provide a minimum tree canopy coverage of at least 40% in 10 years and no less than 60% in 20 years. 20 (d) Parking lot pathways are to be provided at least every four rows of parking and a maximum distance of 180 feet shall be maintained between paths. Pathways shall connect 22 with major building entries or other sidewalks, pathways, and destinations, and must be universally accessible and meet ADA standards. 24 (e) Landscaping in parking lots shall integrate with on-site pathways, include permeable pavements or bioswales where feasible, and minimize use of impervious pavement. 26 (f) Where a parking lot is abutting another parking lot on an adjacent parcel, vehicular and pedestrian connections between lots are required, to facilitate circulation within Westgate and 28 to reduce the need for vehicles to return to the street when traveling between sites. Packet Page 216 of 349 22.110.070 Amenity Space, Open Space, and Green Feature Factor Standards. A. Purpose and intent. 2 This section identifies the types of amenity space spaces and greenand open space allowed to satisfy the requirements ofwithin the Westgate District Mixed Use zone, and provides 4 design standards for each type to ensure that proposed development is consistent with the City of Edmonds’ goals for character and quality of the places surrounding the buildings and 6 spaces to be constructed on private property within the Westgate area. This section also describes the Green Factor requirements that apply to each development within Westgate. 8 The intent of the proposed system is not only to establish amenity spaces that serve the community and local needs, but also to provide for the protection and enhancement of natural 10 resources for the benefit of the greater community. Core principles of the Westgate Mixed Use Zone are to promote: 12 • an environment that encourages and facilitates bicycling and pedestrian activity — “walkable” streets that are comfortable, efficient, safe, and interesting; and 14 • coherence of the public-right-of-way, serving to assist residents, building owners and managers with understanding the relationship between the public right-of-way and their own 16 properties; and • sustainability by providing for trees and plants which contribute to privacy, the reduction 18 of noise and air pollution, shade, maintenance of the natural habitat, conservation of water and rainwater management. 20 B. Green Factor Requirements and Fulfillment 22 1. Overview The Green Factor sets a minimum score that is required to be achieved by each 24 development through implementation of allowed landscaping practices. The program provides a menu of landscaping practices that are intended to increase the functional quantity of 26 landscape in a site, to improve livability and ecological quality while allowing flexibility in the site design and implementation. In this approach, each qualifiedallowed landscape feature 28 utilized in a project earns credits that are weighted and calculated through use of the Green Factor Scoresheet. The score is based upon the relationship between the site size and the 30 points earned by implementation of the specified landscape features. For example, credits may be earned for quantity and size of trees and shrubs, bioretention 32 facilities, and depth of soil. Built features such as green roofs, vegetated walls and permeable paving may also earn credits. Bonus points may be earned with supplementary elements such 34 as drought tolerant and native plants, rainwater irrigation, public visibility and food cultivation. Scoring priorities come from livability considerations, an overall decrease in 36 impervious surfaces and climate change adaptation. The functional benefits target a reduction in stormwater runoff, a decrease in building energy, a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, 38 and an increase in habitat space. The minimum score required for all new development in the Westgate District is is 0.30, 40 earned through implementation of features specified below that comply with Green-Factor standards. The implementation of the Green Factor does not have any effect upon Other other 42 site requirements such as Setbacks, Open Space Standards, Street and Parking Standards, and City of Edmonds Municipal Stormwater Code and City of Edmonds Code for Landscaping 44 Packet Page 217 of 349 Requirements that also apply. Green Factor credit may be earned for these site requirements only if they comply with Green Factor standards. 2 2. Application and Implementation The Green Factor for the Westgate District uses for reference Seattle Green Factor tools. 4 These include: • • the Green Factor Worksheet 6 • • the Green Factor Score Sheet • the Green Factor Plant List 8 • the Green Factor and Tree listsList. The Green Factor tools are included adopted in ECDC 22.110.100. 10 In complying with the Green Factor Code, the following steps apply: Step 1. Designers and permit applicants select features to include in planning their site and 12 building and apply them to the site design. Applicants track the actual quantity—e.g. square footage of landscaped areas, pervious paved amenity space, number of trees—using the Green 14 Factor Worksheet. Step 2. Calculations from the Worksheet are entered on the Scoresheet. The professional 16 also enters the site’s square footage on the electronic Scoresheet. The instrument then scores each category of proposed landscape improvements, and provides a total score in relation to 18 the overall site size. The designer can immediately know if the site design is achieving the required score of 0.30, and can adjust the design accordingly. Note that improvements to the 20 public right-of-way (such as public sidewalks, street tree plantings) are allowed to earn points, even though only the private site square footage is included in the site size calculation. 22 Step 3. The landscape professional submits the Scoresheet with the project plans, certifying that the plan meets or exceeds the minimum Green Factor Score and other requirements for 24 the property. The submission also requires indication that a Landscape Management Plan has been submitted to the client. 26 Step 4. City of Edmonds staff verify that the code requirements have been met before issuance of a permit. 28 Using Green Factor with Other Requirements While a specific green feature may count for both Green Factor calculations and other 30 requirements such as Amenity Space or Open Space, the requirements for each need to be met independently. As described in section 22.110.070(C) of this code, Open Space includes 32 Amenity Space, which is usable open space with dimensions for recreational and passive leisure use. In conjunction with the Green Factor requirements, theThe percentage of Amenity 34 Space for Westgate is 15% of lot size, to be addressed within each development project , with the possibility of cooperative aggregation between projects. The Open Space section 36 22.110.070(CD) also addresses green feature requirements, such as retention of vegetation on steep slopes, specifications for tree size, and stormwater management (refer to ECDC18.30); 38 these are examples of features that are likely to overlap with and contribute to the Green Factor score while also contributing to the Open Space requirement. 40 3. Green Factor Categories: The Green Factor tools may take into account the following Landscape Elements: 42 • Landscaped Areas (based on soil depth) • Bio-retention Facilities 44 • Plantings (mulch and ground cover) • Shrubs and Perennials 46 Packet Page 218 of 349 • Tree Canopy (based on tree sizes) • Green Roofs 2 • Vegetated Walls • Approved Water Features 4 • Permeable Paving • Structural Soil Systems 6 • Bonuses for Drought Tolerant Plants, Harvested Rain Water, Food Cultivation, etc. 8 C. Open Space Standards The Westgate District includes two types of open space: Amenity Space and Green Open 10 Space. 12 C. Amenity Space Amenity space is designed to provide residents and visitors of all ages with a variety of 14 outdoor activity space. Although the character of these amenity spaces will differ, they form the places that encourage residents and visitors to spend time in the company of others or to 16 find solitudeenjoy time in an outdoor setting. All new development shall provide amenity space equal to at least a minimum of 15% of the 18 parcel lot size as amenity space. Additional amenity space above the 15% base requirement is encouraged and can be part of the development’s Green Factor plan outlined in chapter 20 22.110.070(B) ECDC and or can contribute to bonus heights as defined in chapter 22.110.090 ECDC. All qualifying amenity space shall be open and accessible to the public during 22 business hours. Qualifying amenity space shall be open to the air and located within six6 feet of the groundfinished grade in order to provide some opportunity for variety and interest in 24 public space while assuring easy accessibility for the public. The types of aRequired and bonus amenity space must be provided in one or more of the 26 following forms and no othersare as follows: (a) Lawns: An open space, available for unstructured recreation. A lawn may be spatially 28 defined by landscaping rather than building frontages. Its landscape shall consist of lawn and trees and shall provide a minimum of 60% planted pervious surface area (such as a turf, 30 groundcover, soil or mulch.) (b) Plazas: An open space, available for civic purposes and commercial activities. A plaza 32 shall be spatially defined primarily by building facades, with strong connections to interior uses. Its landscape shall consist primarily of pavement. Trees are encouraged. Plazas shall be 34 located between buildings and at the intersection of important streets. Plazas shall provide a minimum of 20% planted pervious surface area (such as a rain garden, bioswale, turf, 36 groundcover, soil or mulch). The remaining balance may be any paved surface with a maximum 30% impervious paved surface. 38 (c) Squares: An open space available for unstructured recreation or civic purposes. A square is spatially defined by building facades with strong connections to interior uses. Its landscape 40 shall consist of paths, lawns and trees with a minimum of 20% planted pervious surface area (such as a rain garden, bioswale, turf, groundcover, soil or mulch). The remaining balance 42 may be any paved surface with a maximum 30% impervious paved surface. (d) Accessible Green Rooftops: Accessible green rooftops can confer significant added value 44 to a building’s occupants or to the general public, with benefits ranging from enhanced educational opportunities for schools, landscaped “roofparks” for leisure or recreational 46 Packet Page 219 of 349 opportunities, horticultural therapy, and even food production. Accessible green rooftops that provide these benefits may only count toward required amenity space if the building type 2 specifically lists that feature as a permitted amenity space type. Sidewalks: Although not counting toward required amenity space, the purpose of sidewalks is 4 to provide safe, convenient, and pleasant pedestrian circulation along all streets, access to shopfronts and businesses, and to improve the character and identity of commercial and 6 residential areas consistent with the City of Edmonds vision. New development meeting the standards of this Chapter may be allowed to use a portion of the sidewalk area within the 8 public right-of-way for outdoor seating, temporary displays, or other uses consistent with City code standards. 10 D. Green Open Space 12 All new development shall provide a minimum of 15% of parcel size as open space. Qualifying open space shall be unobstructed and open to the air. The goal for the overall open 14 space in the Westgate District Mixed Use zone is to create a unified, harmonious, and aesthetically pleasing environment that also integrates sustainable concepts and solutions that 16 restore natural functions and processes. In addition to amenity space, the Westgate District Mixed Use zone shall incorporate green open space, as described in the regulations for each 18 building type. Open space also includes: 20 (a) Trees: The location and selection of all new tree planting will express the underlying interconnectivity of the Westgate District and surrounding neighborhoods. Species selection 22 will be in character with the local and regional environment, and comprised of an appropriate mix of evergreen and deciduous trees. Trees will be used to define the landscape character of 24 recreation open space and amenity space areas, identify entry points, and reinforce the legibility of the District by defining major and minor thoroughfares for pedestrians, bicycles 26 and vehicles. • All new development shall preserve existing trees wherever feasible. 28 • All new development shall plant new trees in accordance with this chapter. 30 (b) Steep Slopes: New development shall protect steep slopes by retaining all existing trees and vegetation on protected slopes, as shown on the map included in this section (Figure 32 22.110.070.D). No development activity, including activities such as clearing, grading, or construction of structures or retaining walls, shall extend uphill of the protected slope line 34 shown on the following map. 36 (c) Stormwater Management: Stormwater runoff from sidewalks should be conveyed to planted parkways or landscaped rain gardens. Overflow from parkways and runoff from the 38 roadways should be directed into bioswales and/or pervious paving in curbside parking areas, located along the street edges where it can infiltrate into the ground. Perforated curbs through 40 which street stormwater runoff can flow to open vegetated swales may also be provided, wherever feasible. 42 Packet Page 220 of 349 22.110.070.D Protected Slopes 2 22.110.080 Public Space Standards. 4 In the Westgate District – and within the larger context of the City of Edmonds – there are multiple opportunities to enhance public space for recreational use, pedestrian activity, and 6 ecological health. Future development of the Westgate Mixed Use District shall capitalize on opportunities to create and enhance public spaces for recreational use, pedestrian activity, and 8 ecological healththese opportunities to strengthen the overall character of the District’s public spaces. 10 A. Public Space: General Requirements 12 Public space shall enhance and promote the environmental quality and the aesthetic character of the Westgate District in the following ways: 14 (a) the landscape shall define, unify and enhance the public realm; including streets, parks, plazas, and sidewalks; 16 (b) the landscape shall be sensitive to its environmental context and utilize plant species that reduce the need for supplemental irrigation water; 18 (c) the landscape shall cleanse and detain storm water on site by utilizing a combination of biofiltration, permeable paving and subsurface detention methods; and, 20 Packet Page 221 of 349 (d) the landscape shall be compatible with encouraging health and wellness, encouraging walking, bicycling, and other activities. 2 B. Public Space: Sustainability 4 The goal for the overall landscape design of public spaces is to create a unified, harmonious, socially vibrant, and aesthetically pleasing environment that also integrates 6 sustainable concepts and solutions to restore natural functions and processes. The public right of way and urban\street runoff becomes an extension of existing drainage pathways and the 8 natural ecology. Water efficient landscaping shall be introduced to reduce irrigation requirements based on a 10 soil/ climate analysis to determine the most appropriate indigenous/native-in-character, and drought tolerant plants. All planted areas, except for lawn and seeded groundcover, shall 12 receive a surface layer of specified recycled mulch to assist in the retention of moisture and reduce watering requirements, while minimizing weed growth and reducing the need for 14 chemical herbicide treatments. Where irrigation is required, high efficiency irrigation technology with low-pressure 16 applications such as drip, soaker hose, rain shut-off devices, and low volume spray will be used. The efficiency and uniformity of a low water flow rate reduces evaporation and runoff 18 and encourages deep percolation. After the initial growth period of three to seven years, irrigation may be limited in accordance with City requirements then in place. 20 The location and selection of all new tree planting will adhere toimplement ‘green infrastructure’ principles andby visually expressing the underlying interconnectivity of the 22 Westgate development by doing the following:. 1. Species selection will shall be comprised of an appropriate mix of evergreen and 24 deciduous trees. 2. Trees will shall be used to define the landscape character of recreation and open space 26 areas, identify entry points, and reinforce the legibility of the neighborhood by defining major and minor thoroughfares for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles. 28 1.3. Trees will shall also be used to soften and shade surface parking and circulation areas. 30 32 Packet Page 222 of 349 C. Stormwater Management. Stormwater shall be consistent with chapter 18.30 ECDC. 2 Stormwater and hydrology components will shall be integrated into the Westgate District to restore and maintain natural functions and processes, mitigate negative environmental 4 impacts. Public rights-of-way, proposed open space and parking lots will shall filter and infiltrate 6 stormwater to the maximum extent feasible to protect the receiving waters of Puget Sound. This ecological concept transcends the Westgate District to positively affect the surrounding 8 neighborhoods, stream corridors and the regional watershed. The two primary objectives of the proposed stormwater and hydrology components are: 10 (a) to reduce volume and rate of runoff; and (b) to eliminate or minimize runoff pollutants through natural filtration. 12 These objectives will shall be met by: (a) maximizing pervious areas; 14 (b) maximizing the use of trees; (c) controlling runoff into bioswales and biofiltration strips; 16 (d) utilizing permeable paving surfaces where applicable and feasible; (e) utilizing portions of parks and recreational spaces as detention basin; and 18 (f ) removing sediments and dissolved pollutants from runoff. 22.110.090 Height Bonus. 20 Areas eligible for a 4th story height bonus are shown in the diagram contained in chapter 22.110.010.B ECDC. Areas within the Westgate Mixed Use District that are not shown in 22 diagram ECDC 22.110.010.B may not contain four story buildings regardless of how many points such a development could achieve on the Height Bonus Score Sheet, below. In order to 24 obtain the height bonus for projects in eligible areas, the proposal must obtain 8 points from the Height Bonus Score Sheet, including pointswith at least one point in each of at least four 26 different scoring categories. When a 4th story is included proposed in a building, the 4th story must be stepped back at 28 least 10 feet from a building façade facing SR-104 or 100th Ave W. In addition, no 3rd or 4th story may be located within 30 feet of the intersection of SR-100 and 100th Ave W, measured 30 from the corner points of the right-of-way intersection. For proposals seeking to earn points in the Green Building Program category, the applicant 32 shall be required to submit a deposit sufficient for the city to retain an independent green building consultant who is qualified to evaluate the construction of the building at key 34 milestones in order to determine that the building is being constructed in a manner that is consistent with the points proposed on the Height Bonus Score Sheet. 36 Packet Page 223 of 349 Height Bonus Score Sheet Height Bonus to obtain 4 stories requires 8 points with points in at least 4 categories 1 Green Building Program (points are not additive) Points Required 2 Built Green*/LEED* Certified Rating or equivalent Required Credit 1 LEED* Silver / Built Green* 4-5 Rating 1 Credit 2 LEED* Gold or Evergreen Sustainable Development Rating 2 Credit 3 Passive House Standard / LEED* Platinum Rating 4 Credit 4 Living Building* 6 Green Factor (points are not additive) Points Required Green Factor Score 0.3 Required Credit 1 Green Factor Score 0.4 2 Credit 2 Green Factor Score 0.5 3 Credit 3 Green Factor Score 0.6 4 Credit 4 Green Factor Score ≥0.7 5 Amenity Space (points are not additive) Points Required Percentage of amenity space 15% Required Credit 1 Percentage of amenity space 20% 2 Credit 2 Percentage of amenity space 25% 3 Credit 3 Percentage of amenity space ≥30% 4 Alternative Transportation (points are additive) Points Required Meet street standards incl. bikeway & pedestrian networks Required Credit 1 Car-share parking3., provide minimum 2 spaces 1 Credit 2 Charging facility for electric cars, provide minimum 4 spaces 1 Credit 3 Indoor/enclosed covered bicycle storage and indoor changing facilities 1 Large Format Retail Space Credit 1 Development contains one or more retail spaces >15,000 sf 3 1 See locational requirements for extra floor bonus in chapter 22.110.090 ECDC. 2 “Required” means required for all development, whether seeking a height bonus or not. 2 3. “Car-share” parking refers to parking for vehicles that are “shared” or rented by the hour or portion of a day. 4 22.110.100 Green Factor Tools 6 The city shall use the City of Seattle’s Green Factor Tools in implementing the Green Factor standards of this chapter. These tools include: the Green Factor Scoresheet, the Green 8 Factor Worksheet, the Green Factor Plant List, and the Green Factor Tree List. These tools are adopted by reference herein as if set forth in their entirety for use in meeting the Green 10 Factor requirements described in ECDC 22.110.070(B). Packet Page 224 of 349 Edmonds Green Factor Tools This document includes the following materials: Green Factor Worksheet Green Factor Score Sheet Green Factor Plant List Green Factor Trees Packet Page 225 of 349 1 2 3 keep adding columns as needed A1 square feet 0 A2 square feet 0 A3 square feet 0 B1 square feet 0 B2 # of plants 0 B3 # of trees 0 B4 # of trees 0 B5 # of trees 0 B6 # of trees 0 B7 # of trees 0 C1 square feet 0 C2 square feet 0 D square feet 0 E square feet 0 F1 square feet 0 F2 square feet 0 G square feet 0 H1 square feet 0 H2 square feet 0 H3 square feet 0 H4 square feet 0 ** Enter totals on the Green Factor score sheet * See Green Factor score sheet for category definitions Planting Area TOTAL** Green Factor Worksheet* Packet Page 226 of 349 enter sq ft of parcel Parcel size (enter this value first) *5,000 SCORE - Landscape Elements**Factor Total A Landscaped areas (select one of the following for each area) enter sq ft 1 Landscaped areas with a soil depth of less than 24"0 0.1 - enter sq ft 2 Landscaped areas with a soil depth of 24" or greater 0 0.6 - enter sq ft 3 Bioretention facilities 0 1.0 - B Plantings (credit for plants in landscaped areas from Section A) enter sq ft 1 Mulch, ground covers, or other plants less than 2' tall at maturity 0 0.1 - enter number of plants 2 Shrubs or perennials 2'+ at maturity - calculated 0 0 0.3 - at 12 sq ft per plant (typically planted no closer than 18" on center) enter number of plants 3 Tree canopy for "small trees" or equivalent 0 0 0.3 - (canopy spread 8' to 15') - calculated at 75 sq ft per tree enter number of plants 4 Tree canopy for "small/medium trees" or equivalent 0 0 0.3 - (canopy spread 16' to 20') - calculated at 150 sq ft per tree enter number of plants 5 Tree canopy for "medium/large trees" or equivalent 0 0 0.4 - (canopy spread of 21' to 25') - calculated at 250 sq ft per tree enter number of plants 6 Tree canopy for "large trees" or equivalent 0 0 0.4 - (canopy spread of 26' to 30') - calculated at 350 sq ft per tree enter inches DBH 7 Tree canopy for preservation of large existing trees 0 0 0.8 - with trunks 6"+ in diameter - calculated at 20 sq ft per inch diameter C Green roofs enter sq ft 1 Over at least 2" and less than 4" of growth medium 0 0.4 - enter sq ft 2 Over at least 4" of growth medium 0 0.7 - enter sq ft D Vegetated walls 0 0.7 - enter sq ft E Approved water features 0 0.7 - F Permeable paving enter sq ft 1 Permeable paving over at least 6" and less than 24" of soil or gravel 0 0.2 - enter sq ft 2 Permeable paving over at least 24" of soil or gravel 0 0.5 - enter sq ft G Structural soil systems 0 0.2 - sub-total of sq ft =0 H Bonuses enter sq ft 1 Drought-tolerant or native plant species 0 0.1 - enter sq ft 2 Landscaped areas where at least 50% of annual irrigation needs are met 0 0.2 - through the use of harvested rainwater enter sq ft 3 Landscaping visible to passersby from adjacent 0 0.1 - public right of way or public open spaces enter sq ft 4 Landscaping in food cultivation 0 0.1 - Green Factor numerator =- Green Factor Score Sheet * Do not count public rights-of-way in parcel size calculation. ** You may count landscape improvements in rights-of-way contiguous with the parcel. All landscaping on private and public property must comply with the Landscape Standards Director's Rule (DR 6-2009) Project title: Totals from GF worksheet Packet Page 227 of 349 Revised December 2010 Se a t t l e G r e e n F a c t o r P l a n t L i s t Sc i e n t i f i c N a m e Co m m o n N a m e E v e r g r e e n S h a d e S u n N a t i v e u p t o 2 4 " 2 - 3 ' h t B i o r e t e n t i o n Z o n e N o t e s A rc t o s t a p h y l o s u v a - u r s i ki n n i k i n n i c k ●● ● ● A sa r u m c a u d a t u m wi l d g i n g e r ●● ● Ca l l u n a , i n v a r i e t y he a t h e r ●● ● Ce r a t o s t i g m a p l u m b a g i n o i d e s ha r d y p l u m b a g o ●● ● ● Da b o e c i a c a n t a b r i c a Ir i s h h e a t h ●● ● Er i c a , i n v a r i e t y he a t h ●● ● Er i g e r o n k a r v i n s k i a n u s La t i n A m e r i c a n f l e a b a n e ●● ● ● Eu o n y m o u s f o r t u n e i ' C o l o r a t a ' wi n t e r c r e e p e r e u o n y m o u s ●● ● ● Fe s t u c a g l a u c a bl u e f e s c u e ●● ● Fr a g a r i a c h i l o e n s i s be a c h s t r a w b e r r y ●● ● ● ● Aggressive Fr a g a r i a x ' L i p s t i c k ' pi n k - f l o w e r e d b a r r e n s t r a w b e r r y ●● ● ● Aggressive Ge n i s t a l y d i a ha r d y d w a r f b r o o m ●● ● Ge n i s t a p i l o s a si l k y l e a f b r o o m ●● ● Ju n i p e r u s c o n f e r t a s h o r e j u n i p e r ●● ● Mi c r o b i o t a d e c u s s a t a Ru s s i a n a r b o r v i t a e ●● ● 2 Pa c h y s a n d r a t e r m i n a l i s Ja p a n e s e s p u r g e ●● ● Pa c h y s a n d r a p r o c u m b e n s Al l e g h e n y p a c h y s a n d r a ●● ● Pa x i s t i m a c a n b y i Ca n b y p a x i s t i m a ●● ● ● Ru b u s p e n t a l o b u s cr e e p i n g b r a m b l e ●● ● ● Vi n c a m i n o r pe r i w i n k l e ●● ● PE R E N N I A L S / F E R N S / G R A S S E S Sc i e n t i f i c N a m e Co m m o n N a m e Ev e r g r e e n S h a d e S u n N a t i v e u p t o 2 4 " 2 - 3 ' h t B i o r e t e n t i o n Z o n e N o t e s A ch i l l e a m i l l e f o l i u m ya r r o w ●● ● A ll i u m , i n v a r i e t y or n a m e n t a l a l l i u m ●● A ru n c u s s y l v e s t r e 'M i s t y L a c e " dw a r f g o a t s b e a r d ●● ● 1B A st e r , in v a r i e t y as t e r ●●● A th y r i u m f i l i x - f e m i n a la d y f e r n ●● ● No t e s : ● A l l p l a n t s o n t h i s l i s t a r e d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t o n c e t h e y a r e e s t a b l i s h e d u n l e s s c o m m e n t s i n d i c a t e o t h e r w i s e . ● S e a t t l e D e p a r t m e n t o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n s R i g h t - o f W a y I m p r o v e m e n t M a n u a l e s t a b l i s h e s h e i g h t l i m i t s f o r n o n - s t r e e t - t r e e p l a n t i n g s i n r i g h t s - o f - w a y . M a x i m u m p l a n t he i g h t w i t h i n 3 0 f e e t o f a n i n t e r s e c t i o n ( a s m e a s u r e d f r o m t h e c o r n e r o f t h e c u r b ) i s 2 4 i n c h e s . E l s e w h e r e i n t h e r i g h t - o f - w a y , p l a n t i n g s a r e a l l o w e d t o b e 3 0 i n c h e s t a l l . ● " B i o r e t e n t i o n Z o n e " d e s c r i b e s w h e r e p l a n t s c a n a p p r o p r i a t e l y b e u s e d i n b i o r e t e n t i o n s y s t e m s s u c h a s s w a l e s a n d r a i n g a r d e n s . Z o n e 1 i s t h e d e s i g n a t i o n f o r p l a n t s th a t c a n b e u s e d i n t h e f l a t b o t t o m s o f b i o r e t e n t i o n f a c i l i t i e s : 1 A r e f e r s t o s p e c i e s t h a t p r e f e r s o i l s a t u r a t i o n o r s h a l l o w i n u n d a t i o n f o r l o n g d u r a t i o n s , w h i l e Z o n e 1 B re f e r s t o p l a n t s t h a t c a n a l t e r n a t e b e t w e e n d r y a n d s s h o r t - t e r m s a t u r a t e d c o n d i t i o n s . Z o n e 2 i s t h e d e s i g n a t i o n f o r p l a n t s b e s t u s e d a t t h e w e l l - d r a i n e d s l o p e s o f bi o r e t e n t i o n f a c i l i t i e s . A l l o t h e r s p e c i e s a r e a p p r o p r i a t e f o r p l a n t i n g a t t h e t o p s o f b i o r e t e n t i o n a r e a s . GR O U N D C O V E R S Packet Page 228 of 349 Revised December 2010 Be r g e n i a , in v a r i e t y be r g e n i a ●● ● Bl e c h n u m s p i c a n t de e r f e r n ●● ● ● Ca l l u n a v u l g a r i s he a t h e r ●● ● Ca r e x a m p l i f o l i a am p l e - l e a v e d s e d g e ●● ● 1A, 1B N o t d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t Ca r e x d o l i c h o s t a c h y a go l d f o u n t a i n s e d g e ● ● ● 1A N o t drought-tolerant Ca r e x m o r r o w i i Mo r r o w ' s s e d g e ● ● ● Ca r e x o b n u p t a sl o u g h s e d g e ● ●● ●1A, 1B N o t d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t Ca r e x p a c h y s t a c h y a th i c k - h e a d e d s e d g e ● ●● ● 1B Ca r e x s t i p a t a be a k e d s e d g e ●● ● ●1A N o t d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t Ca r e x t e s t a c e a or a n g e s e d g e ● ● ● 1A, 1B, 2 Ci n e r a r i a m a r i t i m a du s t y m i l l e r ●● ● De s c h a m p s i a c e s p i t o s a tu f t e d h a i r g r a s s ●● ● ●1A, 1B N o t d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t Di e r a m a p u l c h e r r i m u m an g e l ' s f i s h i n g r o d s ● ●● Ep i m e d i u m , in v a r i e t y bi s h o p ' s h a t ● ●● ● Ga i l l a r d i a , in v a r i e t y bl a n k e t f l o w e r ●● Ge r a n i u m m a c r o r r h i z u m bi g r o o t c r a n e s b i l l ●● ● 2 Ge r a n i u m x c a n t a b r i g i e n s e ‘B i o k o v o ’ Bi o k o v o g e r a n i u m ●● ●● He m e r o c a l l i s , in v a r i e t y da y l i l y ●● 2 He u c h e r a , in v a r i e t y he u c h e r a , c o r a l b e l l s ●● ● 2 Ib e r i s s e m p e r v i r e n s ev e r g r e e n c a n d y t u f t ●● ● Ir i s "P a c i f i c C o a s t H y b r i d s " Pa c i f i c C o a s t i r i s ●● ● ● ● Ju n c u s b a l t i c u s Ba l t i c r u s h ●● ● 1A, 1B Not drought-tolerant Ju n c u s e f f u s u s so f t r u s h ●● ● ● 1A, 1B, 2Aggressive, not drought-tolerant Ju n c u s e n s i f o l i u s da g g e r l e a f r u s h ●● ● 1A N o t drought-tolerant Ju n c u s p a t e n s 'E l k b l u e ' Ca l i f o r n i a g r a y r u s h ●● ● ●1A, 1B N o t d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t La v a n d u l a a n g u s t i f o l i a la v e n d e r se m i ●● Li a t r i s s p i c a t a ga y f e a t h e r ●● Li r i o p e , in v a r i e t y li l y t u r f ●● ● Lu p i n u s , in v a r i e t y lu p i n e ●● ● Mo n a r d a d i d y m a 'P e t i t e W o n d e r ' be e b a l m ●● ● Mu s c a r i b o t r y o i d e s gr a p e h y a c i n t h ●● ● Na r c i s s u s , in v a r i e t y da f f o d i l ●● Ne p e t a , in v a r i e t y ca t m i n t ●● ●2 Or i g a n u m , i n v a r i e t y ma r j o r a m , o r n a m e n t a l o r e g a n o ●● ● Pe n s t e m o n , in v a r i e t y pe n s t e m o n ●● Pe t a s i t e s f r i g i d u s co l t s f o o t ●● ● 1A, 1B Not drought-tolerant Ph l o x s u b u l a t a ph l o x ●● Po l y s t i c h u m m u n i t u m we s t e r n s w o r d f e r n ●● ● ●2 Ru d b e c k i a , in v a r i e t y co n e f l o w e r ●● Sa g i t t a r i a l a t i f o l i a ar r o w h e a d ●● Sa l v i a , in v a r i e t y sa g e ● ● ● Sc i r p u s a c u t u s ha r d s t e m b u l r u s h ●● 1A N o t drought-tolerant Packet Page 229 of 349 Revised December 2010 Sc i r p u s a t r o c i n c t u s wo o l - g r a s s ●● ● ● 1A, 1B N o t d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t Sc i r p u s m i c r o c a r p u s sm a l l - f r u i t e d b u l r u s h ●● ● 1A N o t d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t Th y m u s , i n v a r i e t y th y m e ●● ● To l m i e a m e n z i e s i i yo u t h - o n - a g e ● ●● Tu l i p a , i n v a r i e t y tu l i p ●● Yu c c a f i l a m e n t o s a yu c c a ●● ● LO W S H R U B S ( p r u n i n g m a y b e r e q u i r e d t o m a i n t a i n 2 4 " o r 3 0 " m a x i m u m h e i g h t i n R O W ) Sc i e n t i f i c N a m e Co m m o n N a m e E v e r g r e e n S h a d e S u n N a t i v e u p t o 2 4 " 2 - 3 ' h t B i o r e t e n t i o n Z o n e N o t e s A be l i a x g r a n d i f l o r a 'R o s e C r e e k ' ab e l i a ●● ● ● 2 A rc t o s t a p h y l o s d e n s i f l o r a Vi n e H i l l m a n z a n i t a ●● ● 2 A rc t o s t a p h y l o s p u m i l a ma n z a n i t a ●● ● Be r b e r i s b u x i f o l i a ' P y g m a e a ' o r ' N a n a ' dw a r f b o x l e a f b a r b e r r y ●● ● Be r b e r i s c a n d i d u l a pa l e l e a f b a r b e r r y ●● ● Be r b e r i s d a r w i n i i ' Co m p a c t a ' dw a r f D a r w i n b a r b e r r y ●● ● Be r b e r i s s t e n o p h y l l a 'C o r a l l i n a C o m p a c t a ' dw a r f c o r a l h e d g e b a r b e r r y ●● ● Be r b e r i s t h u n b e r g i i Ja p a n e s e b a r b e r r y ●● ● Be r b e r i s v e r r u c u l o s a wa r t y b a r b e r r y ●● ●2 Bu x u s m i c r o p h y l l a 'C o m p a c t a ' li t t l e - l e a f b o x w o o d ●● ● Bu x u s s e m p e r v i r e n s 'S u f f r u t i c o s a ' co m m o n e d g i n g b o x w o o d ●● ●2 Ca r y o p t e r i s , in v a r i e t y ca r y o p t e r i s ●● Ca s s i n i a l e p t o p h y l l a ca s s i n i a ●● ●2 Ce a n o t h u s g l o r i o s u s Po i n t R e y e s c e a n o t h u s ●● ● 2 Ch a m a e c y p a r i s o b t u s a 'N a n a ' dw a r f h i n o k i c y p r e s s ●● ● ● Ci s t u s , in v a r i e t y ro c k r o s e ●● ●2 Co r n u s s e r i c e a 'K e l s e y i i ' Ke l s e y r e d s t e m d o g w o o d ●● ●1B, 2 Co t o n e a s t e r d a m m e r i be a r b e r r y c o t o n e a s t e r ●● ● Da b o e c i a c a n t a b r i c a Ir i s h h e a t h ●● ● Es c a l l o n i a ‘C o m p a c t a ’ co m p a c t e s c a l l o n i a ●● ● ●2 Eu o n y m u s j a p o n i c u s 'M i c r o p h y l l u s ' ev e r g r e e n e u o n y m o u s ●● ● ●2 Eu r y o p s , in v a r i e t y eu r y o p s ●● ● ● 2 Ga u l t h e r i a s h a l l o n sa l a l ●● ● ●2 Ha l i m i o c i s t u s x sa h u c i i ha l i m i o c i s t u s ●● ● Ha l i m i o c i s t u s x wi n t o n e n s i s ha l i m i o c i s t u s ●● ● 2 He b e , in v a r i e t y he b e ●● ● ● 2 Hy d r a n g e a q u e r c i f o l i a 'P e e W e e ' dw a r f o a k - l e a f h y d r a n g e a ●● ●1B, 2 Il e x c r e n a t a ‘C o m p a c t a ’ Ja p a n e s e h o l l y ●● ●●2 Il e x c r e n a t a ' H e l l e r i ' He l l e r J a p a n e s e h o l l y ●● ● ● La v a n d u l a , in v a r i e t y la v a n d e r ●● ●2 Ma h o n i a n e r v o s a lo w O r e g o n h o l l y - g r a p e ●● ● ●2 Ma h o n i a r e p e n s cr e e p i n g O r e g o n h o l l y - g r a p e ●● ●●● Na n d i n a d o m e s t i c a 'C o m p a c t a ' o r ' H a r b o r D w a r f ' or ' G u l f S t r e a m ' dw a r f h e a v e n l y - b a m b o o ●● ● ●2 Packet Page 230 of 349 Revised December 2010 Ol e a e u r o p a e a 'L i t t l e O l l i e ' [ ' M o n t r a ' ] dw a r f o l i v e ●● ● 2 Ph l o m i s p u r p u r e a ph l o m i s ●● ●2 Ph o r m i u m t e n a x 'T i n y T i m ' o r ' J a c k S p r a t ' co m p a c t N e w Z e a l a n d f l a x ●● ● Pi e r i s j a p o n i c a ' C a v a t i n e ' Ca v a t i n e ' a n d r o m e d a ●● ● Pi t t o s p o r u m t o b i r a 'W h e e l e r ' s D w a r f ' a n d ' S h i m a ' dw a r f J a p a n e s e m o c k - o r a n g e ●● ● ●2 Po t e n t i l l a f r u t i c o s a sh r u b b y c i n q u e f o i l ●●2 Pr u n u s l a u r o c e r a s u s 'M o u n t V e r n o n ' Mo u n t V e r n o n c h e r r y l a u r e l ●● ● Rh o d o d e n d r o n 'P J M P r i n c e s s S u s a n ' (c o m p a c t / d w a r f f o r m ) co m p a c t P J M r h o d o d e n d r o n ●● ●2 Rh o d o d e n d r o n , i n v a r i e t y rh o d o d e n d r o n a n d a z a l e a ●● ● ●2 Rh u s a r o m a t i c a 'G r o - L o w ' dw a r f l e m o n a d e s u m a c ●● ●2 Ro s a n u t k a n a No o t k a R o s e ●● 1B, 2 Ro s a r u g o s a Ru g o s a R o s e ● 1B, 2 Ro s m a r i n u s o f f i c i n a l i s 'C o l l i n g w o o d I n g r a m ' dw a r f r o s e m a r y ●● ●2 Ro s m a r i n u s o f f i c i n a l i s '' M a j o r c a P i n k ' Ro s e m a r y ●● 2 Ru s c u s a c u l e a t u s a n d R . h y p o g l o s s u m bu t c h e r s b r o o m ●● ● Se n e c i o g r e y i i se n e c i o ●● ●2 Sa r c o c o c c a h o o k e r i a n a v a r . h u m i l i s sw e e t b o x ●● ● Sp i r a e a b e t u l i f o l i a sh i n y - l e a f s p i r e a ●● ● ●2 Sp i r a e a d o u g l a s i i St e e p l e b u s h ●● ● ●1A,1B, 2 Sp i r a e a j a p o n i c a 'L i t t l e P r i n c e s s ' dw a r f J a p a n e s e s p i r e a ●●2 Sp i r a e a x b u m a l d a ‘ M a g i c c a r p e t ’ bu m a l d a s p i r e a ●● ●1B Sy m p h o r i c a r p o s a l b u s sn o w b e r r y ● ●● ●1A, 1B, 2 Te u c r i u m c h a m a e d r y s wa l l g e r m a n d e r ●● ● Vi b u r n u m a c e r i f o l i u m ' N a n a ' dw a r f c r a n b e r r y b u s h v i b u r n u m ●● ●1B Vi b u r n u m d a v i d i i Da v i d v i b u r n u m ●● ● ●2 Vi b u r n u m t r i l o b u m ' C o m p a c t u m ' dw a r f c r a n b e r r y b u s h v i b u r n u m ●● ●1B, 2 TA L L S H R U B S ( s u b j e c t t o s i t e - s p e c i f i c a p p r o v a l i f u s e d i n R O W ) Sc i e n t i f i c N a m e Co m m o n N a m e E v e r g r e e n S h a d e S u n N a t i v e u p t o 2 4 " 2 - 3 ' h t B i o r e t e n t i o n Z o n e N o t e s A rb u t u s u n e d o 'C o m p a c t a ' co m p a c t s t r a w b e r r y t r e e ●● ● 2 Ca m e l i a s a s a n q u a 'Y u l e t i d e ' yu l e t i d e c a m e l i a ●● ● Ce a n o t h u s J u l i a P h e l p s Sm a l l l e a f M o u n t a i n l i l a c ●● 2 Ch a m a e c y p a r i s o b t u s a ' n a n a g r a c i l i s ' dw a r f h i n o k i c y p r e s s ●● 2 Ch o i s y a t e r n a t a Me x i c a n m o c k o r a n g e ●● ● Co r n u s s t o l o n i f e r a Re d - o s i e r D o g w o o d ●● ● 1A, 1B, 2 Co r n u s s e r i c e a 'I s a n t i ' co m p a c t r e d t w i g d o g w o o d ●● ● 1B, 2 Hy d r a n g e a q u e r c i f o l i a oa k - l e a f h y d r a n g e a ●● 2 Ho l o d i s c u s d i s c o l o r Oc e a n S p r a y ●● ● 1 A , 1 B , 2 Ma h o n i a a q u i f o l i u m Ta l l O r e g o n G r a p e ●● ● ● 1 A , 1 B , 2 Packet Page 231 of 349 Revised December 2010 Ma h o n i a x m e d i a ' A r t h u r M e n z i e s ' hy b r i d m a h o n i a ●● ● ● 2 My r i c a c a l i f o r n i c a Ca l i f o r n i a w a x - m y r t l e ●● ● 2 Ph i l a d e l p h u s l e w i s i i Mo c k - o r a n g e ●● 1B,1A, 2 Ph o r m i u m t e n a x Ne w Z e a l a n d f l a x ●● 2 Ph y s o c a r p u s c a p t a t u s Pa c i f i c N i n e b a r k ●● ● 1B,1A, 2 Ph y s o c a r p u s o p u l i f o l i u s ' D i a b l o ' Di a b l o N i n e b a r k ●● 1B,1A, 2 Ri b e s s a n g u i n e u m an d c u l t i v a t e d v a r i e t i e s re d - f l o w e r i n g c u r r a n t ●● ● 2 Sa l i x h o o k e r i a n a Ho o k e r ' s W i l l o w ●● ● 1A,1B, 2 N o t d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t Ta x u s b a c c a t a ' Fa s t i g i a t a ' Ir i s h y e w ●● ● Va c c i n i u m o v a t u m ev e r g r e e n h u c k l e b e r r y ●● ● ● 2 BI O R E T E N T I O N T R E E S ( a p p r o p r i a t e f o r z o n e s 1 A o r 1 B ) , s u b j e c t t o s i t e - s p e c i f i c a p p r o v a l i n R O W . S e e G r e e n F a c t o r t r e e l i s t f o r n o n - b i o r e t e n t i o n o p t i o n s . Sc i e n t i f i c N a m e Co m m o n N a m e E v e r g r e e n S h a d e S u n N a t i v e u p t o 2 4 " 2 - 3 ' h t B i o r e t e n t i o n Z o n e N o t e s Ab i e s g r a n d i s Gr a n d F i r ●● ● 1B, 2 Ac e r c i r c i n a t u m Vi n e M a p l e ●● ● 1A,1B, 2 Ac e r g l a b r u m Ro c k y M o u n t i a n M a p l e ●● ● 1A,1B, 2 Ac e r s a c c h a r u m ' C o m m e m o r a t i o n ' Co m m e m o r a t i o n S u g a r M a p l e ●● 1A,1B, 2 Al n u s c r i s p a Si t k a A l d e r ●● ● 1A,1B, 2 Al n u s r u b r a Re d A l d e r ●● ● 1A,1B, 2 Be t u l a p a p y r i f e r a Wh i t e B i r c h ●● ● 1A,1B, 2 Ch a m a e c y p a r i s n o o t k a t e n s i s Al a s k a n C e d a r ●● ● ● 1A,1B, 2 Co r y l u s c o r n u t a Be a k e d H a z e l n u t ●● ● 1A,1B, 2 Fr a x i n u s l a t i f o l i a Or e g o n A s h ●● 1A,1B, 2 Li q u i d a m b a r s t y r a c i f l u a Sw e e t G u m ● 1A,1B, 2 Po p u l u s t r e m u l o i d e s Qu a k i n g A s p e n ●● 1A,1B, 2 Ps e u d o t s u g a m e n z i e s i i Do u g l a s F i r ●● ● ● 1B, 2 Rh a m u s p u r s h i a n a Ca s c a r a ●● ● 1A,1B, 2 Sa l i x l u c i d a Pa c i f i c W i l l o w ●● 1A,1B, 2 Sa l i x s c o u l e r i a n a Sc o u l e r ' s W i l l o w ●● 1A,1B, 2 Ta x o d i u m d i s t i c h u m Ba l d C y p r e s s ● 1A,1B, 2 Th u j a p l i c a t u m We s t e r n R e d C e d a r ●● ●● 1A,1B, 2 Ts u g a h e t e r o p h y l l a We s t e r n H e m l o c k ●● ● ●1A,1B, 2 Packet Page 232 of 349 Revised December 2010 V IN E S Sc i e n t i f i c N a m e Co m m o n N a m e Ev e r g r e e n S h a d e S u n N a t i v e u p t o 2 4 " 2 - 3 ' h t B i o r e t e n t i o n Z o n e N o t e s A ct i n i d i a k o l o m i k t a Ko l o m i k t a k i w i ●● A ke b i a q u i n a t a 5- l e a f a k e b i a ● ●● Aggressive A ri s t o l o c h i a m a c r o p h y l l a Du t c h m a n ' s p i p e ●● Cl e m a t i s a r m a n d i i ev e r g r e e n c l e m a t i s ●● Cl e m a t i s x c a r t m a n i i " B l a a v a l " Av a l a n c h e e v e r g r e e n c l e m a t i s ●● Cl e m a t i s m o n t a n a a n e m o n e c l e m a t i s ● Eu o n y m o u s f o r t u n e i 'K e w e n s i s ' o r ' R a d i c a n s ' cl i m b i n g w i n t e r c r e e p e r ●● ● Hy d r a n g e a a n o m a l a cl i m b i n g h y d r a n g e a ● Ja s m i n u m g r a n d i f l o r u m cl i m b i n g j a s m i n e ●● Lo n i c e r a c i l i o s a or a n g e h o n e y s u c k l e ●● Lo n i c e r a s e m p e r v i r e n s or L. h e c k r o t t i i tr u m p e t h o n e y s u c k l e / c o r a l h o n e y s u c k l e ● Pa s s i f l o r a , in v a r i e t y pa s s i o n v i n e ●● Aggressive Pa r t h e n o c i s s u s q u i n q u e f o l i a Vi r g i n i a c r e e p e r ● Pa r t h e n o c i s s u s t r i c u s p i d a t a Bo s t o n i v y ● Tr a c h e l o s p e r m u m j a s m i n o i d e s st a r j a s m i n e ●● ● Wi s t e r i a , i n v a r i e t y wi s t e r i a ● GR E E N R O O F P L A N T S Sc i e n t i f i c N a m e Co m m o n N a m e Ev e r g r e e n S h a d e S u n N a t i v e u p t o 2 4 " 2 - 3 ' h t B i o r e t e n t i o n Z o n e N o t e s A ll i u m s c h o e n o p r a s u m ch i v e s ●● A ll i u m s e n e s c e n s la v e n d e r - f l o w e r e d o n i o n ●● ● De l o s p e r m a n u b i g e n u m ye l l o w i c e p l a n t ●● ● ● Fe s t u c a i d a h o e n s i s Id a h o f e s c u e ●● ●● Fr a g a r i a c h i l o e n s i s ba r r e n s t r a w b e r r y ●● ● ● ● He b e d e c u m b e n s gr o u n d h e b e ●● ● ● He l i a n t h e m u m n u m m u l a r i u m , in v a r i e t y su n r o s e ●● ● He u c h e r a m i c r a n t h a co r a l b e l l s / a l u m r o o t ● ● ● ● Ib e r i s s e m p e r v i r e n s ev e r g r e e n c a n d y t u f t ●● ● ● Mo n t i a p a r v i f l o r a sm a l l - f l o w e r e d s p r i n g - b e a u t y ●● ● ● Ro s m a r i n u s o f f i c i n a l i s 'P r o s t r a t u s ' pr o s t r a t e r o s e m a r y ●● ● Se d u m d a s y p h y l l u m th i c k - l e a f s t o n e c r o p ●● ●● Se d u m d i v e r g e n s Pa c i f i c s t o n e c r o p ●● ●● Se d u m k a m t s c h a t i c u m Ru s s i a n s t o n e c r o p ●● ● Se d u m l a x u m ro s e f l o w e r s t o n e c r o p ●● ●● Se d u m o r e g a n u m Or e g o n s t o n e c r o p ●● ●● Se d u m s p a t h u l i f o l i u m br o a d l e a f s t o n e c r o p ●● ●● Se d u m s t e f c o st o n e c r o p ●● ● Se m p e r v i v u m a r a c h n o i d e u m he n s a n d c h i c k s ●● ● Si s y r i n c h i u m b e l l u m bl u e - e y e d g r a s s ●● ● Ta l i n u m c a l y c i n u m fa m e f l o w e r ●● ● Tr i f o l i u m r e p e n s Ne w Z e a l a n d W h i t e C l o v e r s e m i ● Packet Page 233 of 349 Revised December 2010 SP E C I E S N O T P E R M I T T E D I N R O W O R N E W L A N D S C A P E P L A N S Sc i e n t i f i c N a m e Co m m o n N a m e He d e r a h e l i x - - a l l v a r i e t i e s En g l i s h i v y Bu d d l e i a bu t t e r f l y b u s h Cl e m a t i s v i t a l b a ol d m a n ’ s b e a r d Il e x a q u i f o l i u m En g l i s h h o l l y Pr u n u s l a u r o c e r a s u s En g l i s h L a u r e l Po l y g o n u m a u b e r t i i si l v e r l a c e v i n e An y p l a n t s p e c i e s c l a s s i f i e d b y K i n g C o u n t y a s a Cl a s s A , B , o r C N o x i o u s W e e d Packet Page 234 of 349 Gr e e n F a c t o r T r e e s ( S o r t e d a c c o r d i n g t o c r i t e r i a ) Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e La r g e Ab i e s g r a n d i s Gr a n d F i r 1 0 0 3 5 0 Gr o w s a t 0 - 1 5 0 0 m i n m o i s t c o n i f e r fo r e s t s Ab i e s p r o c e r a No b l e F i r 9 0 3 0 0 Ac e r f r e e m a n i i ' A u t u m n B l a z e ' A u t u m n B l a z e M 5 0 4 0 37 7 0 0 6 Or a n g e Ac e r m a c r o p h y l l u m Bi g L e a f M a p l e 1 0 0 8 0 R o u n d e d 0 ye l l o w / br o w n Ve r y l a r g e n a t i v e Ac e r p l a t a n o i d e s ‘ E m e r a l d Q u e E m e r a l d Q u e e n 5 0 4 0 50 3 0 0 6 Ye l l o w Ac e r s a c c h a r u m ‘ B o n f i r e ’ B o n f i r e S u g a r M a 5 0 4 0 O v a l 50 3 0 0 6 Br i g h t or a n g e r e d Fa s t e s t g r o w i n g s u g a r m a p l e . Ac e r s a c c h a r u m ' C o m m e m o r a t C o m m e m o r a t i o n 5 0 3 5 38 5 0 0 6 Or a n g e t o or a n g e - r e d Re s i s t a n t t o l e a f t a t t e r . Ac e r s a c c h a r u m ' L e g a c y ' L e g a c y S u g a r M a 5 0 3 5 38 5 0 0 5 Ye l l o w o r or a n g e / r e d Li m i t e d u s e - w h e r e s u g a r m a p l e i s de s i r e d i n s t a n d a r d p l a n t i n g s t r i p s Ae s c u l u s f l a v a Ye l l o w B u c k e y e 7 0 4 0 0 ye l l o w / or a n g e ye l l o w f l o w e r s - l e a s t s u s c e p i b l e t o le a f b l o t c h - l a r g e f r u i t Al n u s r u b r a Re d A l d e r 7 0 3 5 B r o a d l y c o n i 0 ye l l o w / br o w n ni t r o g e n f i x i n g Ce r c i d i p h y l l u m j a p o n i c u m K a t s u r a T r e e 4 0 4 0 O v a l 37 7 0 0 6 Ye l l o w t o or a n g e Ne e d s l o t s o f w a t e r w h e n y o u n g Fa g u s s y l v a t i c a Gr e e n B e e c h 5 0 4 0 O v a l 50 3 0 0 6 Br o n z e S i l v e r y - g r e y b a r k . Fa g u s s y l v a t i c a ' A s p l e n i f o l i a ' F e r n l e a f B e e c h 6 0 6 0 0 6 go l d e n / br o w n Be a u t i f u l c u t l e a f Fr a x i n u s l a t i f o l i a Or e g o n A s h 6 0 3 5 0 ye l l o w / br o w n On l y n a t i v e a s h i n P N W We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 1 of 11 Packet Page 235 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Fr a x i n u s p e n n s y l v a n i c a ‘ U r b a n i U r b a n i t e A s h 5 0 4 0 P y r a m i d a l 5 0 3 0 0 6 De e p br o n z e To l e r a n t o f c i t y c o n d i t i o n s Gy m n o c l a d u s d i o i c u s ' E s p r e s s E s p r e s s o K e n t u c 5 0 3 5 0 6 ye l l o w v e r y c o a r s e b r a n c h e s - e x t r e m e l y la r g e b i - p i n n a t e l y c o m p o u n d l e a f - Li r i o d e n d r o n t u l i p i f e r a Tu l i p T r e e 6 0 3 0 O v a l 35 4 0 0 8 Ye l l o w F a s t - g r o w i n g t r e e . No t h o f a g u s a n t a r c t i c a An t a r c t i c B e e c h 5 0 3 5 38 5 0 0 6 No n e R u g g e d t w i s t e d b r a n c h i n g a n d pe t i t e f o l i a g e . Pi c e a s i t c h e n s i s Si t k a S p r u c e 1 0 0 3 0 0 Ev e r g r e e n N a t i v e e n v i r o n m e n t i s c h a r a c t e r i z e d by a c o o l , m o i s t m a r i t i m e c l i m a t e Pi n u s m o n t i c o l a W e s t e r n W h i t e P i 1 0 0 3 5 0 Ev e r g r e e n O c c u r s i n l o w l a n d f o g f o r e s t s o r o n mo i s t m o u n t a i n s o i l s - p r i m a r y h o s t Pl a t a n u s x a c e r i f o l i a ' B l o o d g o o B l o o d g o o d L o n d o 5 0 4 0 P y r a m i d a l 6 3 7 0 0 8 Re d M o r e a n t h r a c n o s e r e s i s t a n t - n e e d s sp a c e Pl a t a n u s x a c e r i f o l i a ' Y a r w o o d ' Y a r w o o d L o n d o n 5 0 4 0 50 3 0 0 8 Ye l l o w - br o w n Hi g h r e s i s t a n c e t o p o w d e r y m i l d e w . Ps u d o t s u g a m e n z i e s i i Do u g l a s F i r 1 5 0 3 5 0 Ev e r g r e e n Qu e r c u s b i c o l o r Sw a m p W h i t e O a 4 5 4 5 55 7 0 0 8 Va r i e s . S h a g g y p e e l i n g b a r k Qu e r c u s c o c c i n e a Sc a r l e t O a k 5 0 4 0 U p r i g h t 50 3 0 0 6 Re d B e s t o a k f o r f a l l c o l o r Qu e r c u s g a r r y a n a Or e g o n O a k 4 5 4 0 O v a l 43 9 6 0 6 Na t i v e t o P a c i f i c N o r t h w e s t Qu e r c u s i m b r i c a r i a Sh i n g l e O a k 6 0 5 0 0 6 go l d e n / br o w n ni c e s u m m e r f o l i a g e - l e a v e s c a n pe r s i s t Qu e r c u s m u h l e n b e r g i i Ch e s t n u t O a k 6 0 5 0 0 6 br o w n / ye l l o w co a r s e l y t o o t h e d l e a f Qu e r c u s r o b u r En g l i s h O a k 5 0 4 0 R o u n d e d 5 0 3 0 0 8 Ye l l o w - br o w n La r g e , s t u r d y t r e e Qu e r c u s r u b r a Re d O a k 5 0 4 5 R o u n d e d 6 3 6 0 0 8 Re d F a s t g r o w i n g o a k - n e e d s s p a c e We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 2 of 11 Packet Page 236 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Qu e r c u s v e l u t i n a Bl a c k O a k 6 0 5 0 0 6 ru s t y r e d Th u j a p l i c a t a W e s t e r n R e d C e 1 2 5 4 0 P y r a m i d a l 0 Ev e r g r e e n g r o w t h i s s t u n t e d o n d r y s o i l s Ts u g a h e t e r o p h y l l a W e s t e r n H e m l o c 1 3 0 3 0 0 Ev e r g r e e n Ul m u s ‘ H o m e s t e a d ’ Ho m e s t e a d E l m 6 0 3 5 48 1 0 0 6 Ye l l o w Ul m u s ‘ P i o n e e r ’ Pi o n e e r E l m 6 0 5 0 98 2 0 0 6 Ye l l o w R e s i s t a n t t o D u t c h e l m d i s e a s e . Ul m u s p a r v i f o l i a ‘ E m e r I I ’ A l l e e E l m 5 0 3 5 V a s e 38 5 0 0 5 Ye l l o w - or a n g e Ex f o l i a t i n g b a r k a n d n i c e f a l l c o l o r Ze l k o v a s e r r a t a ‘ G r e e n v a s e ’ G r e e n V a s e Z e l k 5 0 4 0 50 3 0 0 5 Or a n g e V i g o r o u s Me d i u m / L a r g e Ac e r c a m p e s t r e He d g e M a p l e 3 0 3 0 14 1 0 0 5 Ye l l o w Ac e r c a m p e s t r e ‘ E v e l y n ’ Q u e e n E l i z a b e t h 3 5 3 0 17 7 0 0 5 Ye l l o w M o r e u p r i g h t b r a n c h i n g t h a n t h e sp e c i e s . Ac e r m i y a b e i ' M o r t o n ' St a t e S t r e e t M a p l 4 5 3 0 0 5 ye l l o w Ac e r p l a t a n o i d e s ‘ P a r k w a y ’ P a r k w a y N o r w a y 4 0 2 5 14 7 0 0 6 Ye l l o w t o l e r a n t o f v e r t i c i l l i u m w i l t Ac e r p s e u d o p l a t a n u s ‘ A t r o p u r p S p a e t h i i M a p l e 4 0 3 0 21 2 0 0 5 No t si g n i f i c a n t Le a v e s g r e e n o n t o p p u r p l e un d e r n e a t h . Ac e r s a c c h a r u m ' G r e e n M o u n t G r e e n M o u n t a i n 4 5 3 5 O v a l 33 7 0 0 6 Re d t o or a n g e . Re l i a b l e f a l l c o l o r Ae s c u l u s x c a r n e a ‘B r i o t t i i ’ R e d H o r s 3 0 3 5 19 2 0 0 5 No Re s i s t s h e a t a n d d r o u g h t b e t t e r th a n o t h e r h o r s e c h e s t m u t s . Be t u l a a l b o s i n e n e s i s v a r s e p t e C h i n e s e R e d B i r c 4 5 3 5 0 5 ye l l o w p i n k / w h i t e p e e l i n g b a r k Be t u l a j a c q u e m o n t i i Ja c q u e m o n t i i B i r 4 0 3 0 O v a l 21 2 0 0 5 Ye l l o w W h i t e b a r k m a k e s f o r g o o d w i n t e r in t e r e s t - b e s t f o r a p h i d r e s i s t a n c e We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 3 of 11 Packet Page 237 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Be t u l a p a p y r i f e r a Pa p e r B i r c h 6 0 3 5 0 Ye l l o w / br o w n Hi g h s u s c e p t i b i l i t y t o a p h i d in f e s t a t i o n Ch a m a e c y p a r i s p i s i f e r a S a w a r a C y p r e s s 4 5 2 5 P y r a m i d a l 1 7 2 0 0 6 Ev e r g r e e n S p e c i a l s i t e a p p r o v a l n e e d e d - ma n y c u l t i v a r s a v a i l a b l e Co r y l u s c o l u r n a Tu r k i s h F i l b e r t 4 0 2 5 P y r a m i d a l 1 4 8 0 0 5 Ye l l o w T i g h t , f o r m a l , d e n s e c r o w n - n o t f o r hi g h p e d e s t r i a n a r e a s Eu c o m m i a u l m o i d e s H a r d y R u b b e r T r 5 0 4 0 0 5 Da r k g r e e n s h i n y l e a v e s Fa g u s s y l v a t i c a ' R o h a n i i ' P u r p l e O a k L e a f 5 0 3 0 0 6 At t r a c t i v e p u r p l e l e a v e s w i t h w a v y ma r g i n s . Fr a x i n u s a m e r i c a n a ' A u t u m n A A u t u m n A p p l a u s 4 0 2 5 O v a l 14 7 0 0 5 Pu r p l e C o m p a c t t r e e - r e p o r t e d l y s e e d l e s s Fr a x i n u s a m e r i c a n a ' E m p i r e ' E m p i r e A s h 5 0 2 5 C o l u m n a r 1 7 9 0 0 5 Ru s t y Or a n g e Us e f o r a r e a s a d j a c e n t t o t a l l e r bu i l d i n g s w h e n a s h i s d e s i r e d Fr a x i n u s p e n n s y l v a n i c a ‘ P a t m o P a t m o r e A s h 4 5 3 5 O v a l 33 7 0 0 5 Ye l l o w E x t r e m e l y h a r d y , m a y b e s e e d l e s s . Gi n k o b i l o b a ‘ A u t u m n G o l d ’ A u t u m n G o l d G i n 4 5 3 5 P y r a m i d a l 3 3 7 0 0 6 Ye l l o w N a r r o w w h e n y o u n g Ha l e s i a m o n t i c o l a Mo u n t a i n S i l v e r b 4 5 2 5 0 5 ye l l o w a t t r a c t i v e , s m a l l w h i t e f l o w e r Ko e l r e u t e r i a p a n i c u l a t a G o l d e n r a i n T r e e 3 0 3 0 14 1 0 0 Ye l l o w M i d s u m m e r b l o o m i n g . Li q u i d a m b a r s t y r a c i f l u a ‘ R o t u n R o t u n d i l o b a S w e 4 5 2 5 17 2 0 0 6 Pu r p l e or a n g e On l y s w e e t g u m t h a t i s e n t i r e l y fr u i t l e s s . S m o o t h r o u n d e d l e a f Ma g n o l i a d e n u d a t a Yu l a n M a g n o l i a 4 0 4 0 0 5 6" i n c h , f r a g r a n t , w h i t e b l o s s o m s i n sp r i n g Me t a s e q u o i a g l y p t o s t r o b o i d e s D a w n R e d w o o d 5 0 2 5 N a r r o w 19 6 2 5 6 Ru s t y F a s t g r o w i n g d e c i d u o u s c o n i f e r Ny s s a s y l v a t i c a Tu p e l o 60 2 0 18 8 0 0 5 Ap r i c o t > br i g h t r e d Ha n d s o m e l y c h u n k y b a r k . Ph e l l o d e n d r o n a m u r e n s e ' M a c M a c h o C o r k T r e e 4 0 4 0 0 5 ye l l o w M a l e s e l e c t i o n - f r u i t l e s s - a n o t h e r go o d v a r i e t y i s ' H i s M a j e s t y ' We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 4 of 11 Packet Page 238 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Pi n u s n i g r a Au s t r i a n P i n e 4 5 2 5 P y r a m i d a l 1 7 2 0 0 6 Ev e r g r e e n S p e c i a l s i t e a p p r o v a l n e e d e d - f a i r l y to l e r a n t o f h e a t , p o l l u t i o n , u r b a n Pi n u s p i n e a It a l i a n S t o n e P i n 4 0 3 0 P y r a m i d a l 2 1 2 0 0 6 Ev e r g r e e n S p e c i a l s i t e a p p r o v a l n e e d e d Po p u l u s t r e m u l o i d e s Qu a k i n g A s p e n 5 0 3 0 0 ye l l o w / or a n g e Py r u s c a l l e r y a n a ‘ A r i s t o c r a t ’ A r i s t o c r a t P e a r 4 0 3 0 21 2 0 0 5 Re d G o o d b r a n c h a n g l e s - o n e o f t h e ta l l e s t p e a r s Qu e r c u s f r a i n e t t o It a l i a n O a k 5 0 3 0 O v a l 28 3 0 0 6 Ye l l o w - Br o w n Dr o u g h t r e s i s t a n t Qu e r c u s r o b u r ‘ f a s t i g i a t a ’ S k y r o c k e t O a k 4 0 1 5 17 2 0 0 6 Ye l l o w - br o w n Co l u m n a r v a r i e t y o f o a k . Sa l i x l a s i a n d r a Pa c i f i c W i l l o w 4 0 3 0 0 ye l l o w So p h o r a j a p o n i c a ' R e g e n t ' J a p a n e s e P a g o d 5 0 4 0 0 6 ye l l o w c a n h a v e t r u n k c a n k e r o r t w i g b l i g h t Ta x o d i u m d i s t i c h u m Ba l d C y p r e s s 5 5 3 0 P y r a m i d a l 3 1 8 0 0 6 Ru s t y r e d A d e c i d u o u s c o n i f e r Ta x o d i u m d i s t i c h u m ' M i c k e l s o n S h a w n e e B r a v e 5 5 2 0 N a r r o w / p y r . 1 4 1 0 0 6 Or a n g e / b r o n ze De c i d u o u s c o n i f e r - t o l e r a t e s c i t y co n d i t i o n s Ti l i a a m e r i c a n a ‘ R e d m o n d ’ R e d m o n d L i n d e n 4 5 3 0 P y r a m i d a l 2 1 2 0 0 8 Ye l l o w P y r a m i d a l , n e e d s w a t e r . Ti l i a c o r d a t a ‘ G r e e n s p i r e ’ G r e e n s p i r e L i n d e 4 0 3 0 21 2 0 0 5 Ye l l o w i s h S y m m e t r i c a l , p y r a m i d a l f o r m . Ze l k o v a s e r r a t a ‘ V i l l a g e G r e e n ’ V i l l a g e G r e e n Z e l 4 0 3 8 34 0 0 0 5 Ru s t y R e d Me d i u m / S m a l l Ac e r n i g r u m ‘ G r e e n C o l u m n ’ G r e e n C o l u m n B l 5 0 1 0 12 6 0 0 5 Ye l l o w t o or a n g e Go o d c l o s e t o b u i l d i n g s . Ac e r p l a t a n o i d e s ‘ C o l u m n a r ’ C o l u m n a r N o r w a 4 0 1 5 53 0 0 5 Ye l l o w G o o d c l o s e t o b u i l d i n g s . Ac e r r u b r u m ‘ B o w h a l l ’ Bo w h a l l M a p l e 4 0 1 5 53 0 0 5 Ye l l o w or a n g e We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 5 of 11 Packet Page 239 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Ac e r r u b r u m ‘ K a r p i c k ’ Ka r p i c k M a p l e 3 5 - 4 0 2 0 88 0 0 5 Ye l l o w t o or a n g e Ma y w o r k u n d e r v e r y h i g h po w e r l i n e s w i t h a r b o r i s t ’ s a p p r o v a l . Ac e r r u b r u m ‘ S c a r s e n ’ S c a r l e t S e n t i n e l 4 0 2 0 94 0 0 5 Ye l l o w or a n g e Ac e r t r u n c a t u m x A . p l a t a n o i d e N o r w e g i a n S u n s 3 5 2 5 12 3 0 0 Ye l l o w - or a n g e / r e d Li m i t e d u s e u n d e r w i r e s Ac e r t r u n c a t u m x A . p l a t a n o i d e P a c i f i c S u n s e t M 3 0 2 5 98 0 0 5 Ye l l o w - or a n g e / r e d Li m i t e d u s e u n d e r w i r e s Al n u s s i n u a t a Si t k a A l d e r 4 0 2 5 0 Pr e f e r s a h e a v y m o i s t s o i l - u s u a l l y fo u n d a b o v e 3 0 0 0 ' f e e t - c a n b e Ca r p i n u s b e t u l u s ‘F a s t i g i a t a ’ P y r a 3 5 1 5 P y r a m i d a l 1 2 3 0 0 5 Ye l l o w B r o a d e n s w h e n o l d e r Cl a d r a s t i s k e n t u k e a Ye l l o w w o o d 4 0 4 0 0 5 ye l l o w / or a n g e wh i t e f l o w e r s i n s p r i n g , r e s e m b l i n g wi s t e r i a f l o w e r s Co r n u s c o n t r o v e r s a ' J u n e S n o G i a n t D o g w o o d 4 0 3 0 0 5 re d / o r a n g e L a r g e w h i t e f l o w e r c l u s t e r s t h a t ap p e a r i n J u n e Cr a t a e g u s c r u s - g a l l i ‘ I n e r m i s ’ T h o r n l e s s C o c k s 2 5 3 0 10 6 0 0 Or a n g e t o sc a r l e t Re d p e r s i s t e n t f r u i t . Cr a t a e g u s p h a e n o p y r u m W a s h i n g t o n H a w 2 5 2 0 47 0 0 Sc a r l e t T h o r n y . Cr a t a e g u s s u k s d o r f i i Su k s d o r f ' s H a w t h 3 0 2 5 0 Sh o r t e r s p i n e s t h a n C . D o u g l a s i i Cr a t a e g u s x l a v a l i i La v a l l e H a w t h o r n 2 8 2 0 56 0 0 Br o n z e T h o r n s o n y o u n g e r t r e e s . Da v i d i a i n v o l u c r a t a Do v e T r e e 4 0 3 0 0 5 la r g e , u n i q u e w h i t e f l o w e r s i n M a y Gi n k o b i l o b a ‘ P r i n c e t o n S e n t r y P r i n c e t o n S e n t r y 4 0 1 5 C o l u m n a r 53 0 0 6 Ye l l o w V e r y n a r r o w g r o w t h . Ha l e s i a t e t r a p t e r a Ca r o l i n a S i l v e r b e l 3 5 3 0 I r r e g u l a r 0 5 Ye l l o w A t t r a c t i v e b a r k f o r s e a s o n a l i n t e r e s t Li b o c e d r u s d e c u r r e n s In c e n s e C e d a r 3 5 2 0 P y r a m i d a l 78 5 0 6 Ev e r g r e e n S p e c i a l s i t e a p p r o v a l n e e d e d We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 6 of 11 Packet Page 240 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Li q u i d a m b a r s t y r a c i f l u a M o r a i n e S w e e t g u 4 0 2 0 94 0 0 6 Ye l l o w , or a n g e / r e d Li g h t g r e e n f o l i a g e . M o r e c o m p a c t th a n o t h e r v a r i e t i e s Ma a c k i a a m u r e n s i s Am u r M a a c k i a 3 0 2 0 0 5 no n e a t t r a c t i v e b a r k a n d s u m m e r fl o w e r s - g r o w s i n t o u g h c o n d i t i o n s Ma g n o l i a ' E l i z a b e t h ' El i z a b e t h M a g n o l 3 0 2 0 0 5 ye l l o w f l o w e r s Ma g n o l i a ' G a l a x y ' Ga l a x y M a g n o l i a 3 5 2 5 p y r a m i d a l 0 5 ye l l o w / b r o w n re d d i s h - p u r p l e f l o w e r s i n s p r i n g . Ma g n o l i a g r a n d i f l o r a ‘ V i c t o r i a ’ V i c t o r i a E v e r g r e e 2 5 2 0 47 0 0 5 Ev e r g r e e n Ma g n o l i a K o b u s W a d a ' s M e m o r y 3 5 2 0 R o u n d 79 0 0 5 Br o w n D o e s n o t f l o w e r w e l l w h e n y o u n g Os t r y a v i r g i n i a n a Ir o n w o o d 4 0 2 5 0 5 ye l l o w h o p l i k e f r u i t Pa r r o t i a p e r s i c a Pe r s i a n P a r r o t i a 3 0 2 0 63 0 0 5 Ye l l o w - or a n g e r e d Se l e c t o r p r u n e f o r s i n g l e s t e m ; c a n be m u l t i - t r u n k e d . Pi n u s d e n s i f l o r a ' U m b r a c u l i f e r a U m b r e l l a P i n e 2 5 2 0 O v a l 48 1 0 8 Ev e r g r e e n S p e c i a l s i t e a p p r o v a l n e e d e d Pr u n u s x y e d o e n s i s ‘ A k e b o n o ’ A k e b o n o F l o w e r i 2 5 2 5 74 0 0 6 Ye l l o w Pt e r o s t y r a x h i s p i d a Fr a g r a n t E p a u l e t t 4 0 3 0 0 5 ye l l o w / br o w n Pe n d u l o u s c r e a m y w h i t e f l o w e r s - fr a g r a n t Py r u s c a l l e r y a n a ‘ C a m b r i d g e ' ’ C a m b r i d g e P e a r 4 0 1 5 P y r a m i d a l 53 0 0 5 Re d d i s h pu r p l e Na r r o w t r e e w i t h g o o d b r a n c h an g l e s a n d f o r m Py r u s c a l l e r y a n a ‘ G l e n ' s F o r m ’ C h a n t i c l e e r o r C l 4 0 1 5 53 0 0 5 Sc a r l e t V i g o r o u s . Py r u s c a l l e r y a n a ‘ R e d s p i r e ’ R e d s p i r e P e a r 3 5 2 5 12 3 0 0 Ye l l o w t o re d Py r a m i d a l . Qu e r c u s ‘ C r i m s c h m i d t ’ C r i m s o n S p i r e O 4 5 1 5 62 0 0 Ha r d t o f i n d . Ro b i n i a x a m b i g u a Pi n k I d a h o L o c u s 3 5 2 5 12 3 0 0 5 Ye l l o w F r a g r a n t f l o w e r s . We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 7 of 11 Packet Page 241 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Sc i a d o p i t y s v e r t i c i l l a t a Ja p a n e s e U m b r e l 3 0 2 0 P y r a m i d a l 63 0 0 8 Ev e r g r e e n G r o w s s l o w l y - p r i s t i n e e v e r g r e e n fo l i a g e - s p e c i a l s i t e a p p r o v a l So r b u s a l n i f o l i a Ko r e a n M o u n t a i n 4 0 3 0 0 5 or a n g e S i m p l e l e a v e s . B e a u t i f u l p i n k - r e d fr u i t - m a y b e s h o r t l i v e d So r b u s a u c u p a r i a ‘ M i t c h r e d ’ C a r d i n a l R o y a l M 3 5 2 0 79 0 0 5 Ru s t B r i g h t r e d b e r r i e s . So r b u s x h y b r i d i a Oa k l e a f R o y a l M t 3 0 2 0 63 0 0 5 Ru s t St e w a r t i a m o n o d e l p h a O r a n g e B a r k S t e 3 0 2 0 0 5 or a n g e o r a n g e p e e l i n g b a r k - w h i t e f l o w e r s in s p r i n g Ta x u s b r e v i f o l i a Pa c i f i c Y e w 4 0 2 5 0 Ev e r g r e e n t y p i c a l l y o c c u r s a s a n u n d e r s t o r y tr e e 3 - 5 m t a l l w e s t o f t h e C a s c a d e s Ti l i a c o r d a t a ‘ D e G r o o t ’ D e G r o o t L i t t l e l e a 3 0 2 0 63 0 0 5 Ye l l o w C o m p a c t , s u c k e r s l e s s t h a n o t h e r Li n d e n s . Ti l i a c o r d a t a ‘ C h a n c o l e ’ C h a n c e l o r L i n d e n 3 5 2 0 79 0 0 5 Ye l l o w P y r a m i d a l . Sm a l l Ac e r b u e g e r i a n u m Tr i d e n t M a p l e 3 0 3 0 0 or a n g e / r e d s e l e c t f o r a s i n g l e s t e m Ac e r c i r c i n a t u m Vi n e M a p l e 2 5 2 5 0 5 re d / o r a n g e D o n o t u s e i n e x p o s e d ' h a r s h ' s i t e s in s t r e e t s c a p e p l a n t i n g s . Ac e r g i n n a l a ‘ F l a m e ’ F l a m e A m u r M a 2 0 2 0 R o u n d 31 0 0 5 Re d S e l e c t o r p r u n e f o r s i n g l e s t e m ; c a n be m u l t i - t r u n k e d . Ac e r g r a n d i d e n t a t u m ‘ S c h m i d t ’ R o c k y M t . G l o w 2 5 + 1 5 27 0 0 5 In t e n s e r e d H a r d t o f i n d Ac e r g r i s e u m Pa p e r b a r k M a p l e 2 5 2 0 27 0 0 5 Sm o o t h , p e e l i n g , c i n n a m o n c o l o r e d ba r k . Ac e r p a l m a t u m Ja p a n e s e M a p l e 2 0 2 4 11 0 0 5 Y Hu n d r e d s o f v a r i e d c u l t i v a r s . C a n be s l o w g r o w i n g . Ac e r p l a t a n o i d e s ‘ G l o b o s u m ’ G l o b e N o r w a y M 2 0 1 8 25 0 0 5 Ye l l o w R o u n d e d t o p , a n d c o m p a c t g r o w t h . Ac e r t r i f l o r u m Th r e e - F l o w e r M a 2 5 2 0 0 5 ap r i c o t / g o l d c r e a m c o l o r e d s h a g g y b a r k We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 8 of 11 Packet Page 242 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Am e l a n c h i e r a l n i f o l i a Sa s k a t o o n S e r v i c 2 0 1 5 0 sh r u b l i k e f o r m - m a y b e d i f f i c u l t t o tr a i n i n t o t r e e f o r m Am e l a n c h i e r g r a n d i f l o r a ‘ P r i n c P r i n c e s s D i a n a S 2 0 1 5 18 0 0 5 Br i g h t r e d G o o d f o r l i m i t e d s p a c e . Am e l a n c h i e r x g r a n d i f l o r a ‘ A u t u A u t u m n B r i l l i a n c e 2 0 1 5 18 0 0 5 Br i g h t r e d R e l i a b l e b l o o m . Ar b u t u s ‘ M a r i n a ’ St r a w b e r r y T r e e 2 5 1 5 27 0 0 5 Go o d s u b s t i t u t e f o r P a c i f i c Ma d r o n e . M a y e x c e e d 2 5 ’ h e i g h t As i m i n a t r i l o b a Pa w P a w 3 0 2 0 0 5 ye l l o w p u r p l i s h b e l l s h a p e d f l o w e r i n s p r i n g be f o r e l e a v e s e m e r g e Ca r p i n u s c a r o l i n i a n a Am e r i c a n H o r n b e 2 5 2 0 27 0 0 5 Ye l l o w t o or a n g e Ou t s t a n d i n g f a l l c o l o r – n i c e l i t t l e tr e e Ca r p i n u s j a p o n i c u s Ja p a n e s e H o r n b 2 0 2 5 11 0 0 5 Br o n z e W i d e s p r e a d i n g – n o t f o r c o n f i n e d sp a c e s Ce r c i s c a n a d e n s i s Ea s t e r n R e d b u d 2 5 3 0 16 0 0 5 Ye l l o w B l o o m s b e f o r e l e a v e s a r e o u t . Ce r c i s s i l i q u a s t r u m Ju d a s T r e e ( E u r o 2 5 3 0 O v a l 16 0 0 5 Ye l l o w b l o o m s b e f o r e l e a v e s e m e r g e Co r n u s a l t e r n i f o l i a Pa g o d a D o g w o o 2 5 2 5 0 5 re d a t t r a c t i v e w h i t e f l o w e r s i n s p r i n g - pr u n e f o r s i n g l e s t e m Co r n u s ' E d d i e ' s W h i t e W o n d e r ' E d d i e ' s W h i t e W 2 5 2 0 P y r a m i d a l 27 0 0 5 Re d A h y b r i d o f C . f l o r i d a a n d C . n u t t a l i i Co r n u s k o u s a ‘ C h i n e n s i s ’ K o u s a D o g w o o d 2 0 2 0 31 0 0 5 Re d d i s h t o sc a r l e t Mo s t r e s i s t a n t t o d i s e a s e o f t h e do g w o o d s . Co t i n u s o b o v a t u s Am e r i c a n S m o k e 2 5 2 5 0 5 va r i e d p i n k i s h p a n i c l e o f f l o w e r s i n s p r i n g - ca n p r u n e f o r s i n g l e s t e m Cr a t a e g u s d o u g l a s i i Bl a c k H a w t h o r n e 3 0 2 5 0 re d / o r a n g e U p t o 1 " i n c h t h o r n s - t i c k e t fo r m i n g - m a y s p r e a d u n d e r g r o u n d Fa g u s s y l v a t i c a ‘D a w y c k P u r p l e ’ 4 0 1 2 C o l u m n a r 34 0 0 5 No Pu r p l e f o l i a g e . La g e r s t r o e m i a ' t u s c a r o r a ' T u s c a r o r a H y b r i d 2 0 1 8 25 0 0 5 Ye l l o w R o u n d e d t o p , a n d c o m p a c t g r o w t h . We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 9 of 11 Packet Page 243 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Li r i o d e n d r o n t u l i p i f e r a ' F a s t i g i a t C o l u m n a r T u l i p 4 0 1 0 N a r r o w 24 0 0 6 Ye l l o w G o o d n e x t t o b u i l d i n g s . Ma g n o l i a g r a n d i f l o r a ‘ L i t t l e G e L i t t l e G e m M a g n 1 5 1 0 16 0 0 5 Ev e r g r e e n U s e f u l w h e r e l a r g e r v a r i e t i e s a r e in a p p r o p r i a t e . Ma g n o l i a x l o e b n e r i Lo e b n e r M a g n o l i 2 0 2 0 31 0 0 Ye l l o w S e v e r a l c u l t i v a r s . Ma l u s ‘ A d i r o n d a c k ’ Ad i r o n d a c k C r a b 1 8 1 0 U p r i g h t 16 0 0 5 Re d f r u i t . E x c e l l e n t s c a b r e s i s t a n c e . Ma l u s ‘ G o l d e n R a i n d r o p s ’ G o l d e n R a i n d r o p 1 8 1 3 11 0 0 5 Ye l l o w A b u n d a n t y e l l o w f r u i t - p e r s i s t s o n tr e e . Ma l u s ‘ T s c h o n o s k i i ’ Ts c h o n o s k i i C r a b 2 8 1 4 20 0 0 5 Sc a r l e t S p a r s e g r e e n f r u i t , p y r a m i d a l . Ma l u s ' D o n a l d W y m a n ' D o n a l d W y m a n 2 5 2 5 0 5 ye l l o w D i s e a s e r e s i s t a n t - n i c e g r e e n fo l i a g e i n s u m m e r - l a r g e w h i t e Ma l u s f u s c a Pa c i f i c C r a b a p p l e 4 0 2 5 0 Ox y d e n d r o n a r b o r e u m S o u r w o o d 3 5 1 2 28 0 0 5 Re d C o n s i s t e n t a n d b r i l l i a n t f a l l c o l o r . Pr u n u s ‘ F r a n k t h r e e s ’ M t . S t . H e l e n s P l 2 0 2 0 31 0 0 5 Pu r p l e f o l i a g e . Pr u n u s ‘ N e w p o r t ’ Ne w p o r t P l u m 2 0 2 0 31 0 0 5 Re d d i s h P u r p l e r e d f o l i a g e . Pr u n u s ‘ S n o w g o o s e ’ S n o w G o o s e C h 2 0 2 0 31 0 0 6 Up r i g h t w h e n y o u n g , s p r e a d i n g wh e n o l d e r . Pr u n u s c e r a s i f e r a ‘ K r a u t e r V e s V e s u v i u s F l o w e r i 3 0 1 5 35 0 0 5 Up r i g h t g r o w t h , d a r k e s t f o l i a g e o f th e p l u m s . Pr u n u s c e r a s i f e r a ‘ T h u n d e r c l o u T h u n d e r c l o u d P l u 2 0 2 0 31 0 0 5 Da r k p u r p l e f o l i a g e . Pr u n u s s a r g e n t i i ' C o l u m n a r i s ' C o l u m n a r S a r g e n 3 5 1 5 C o l u m n a r 44 0 0 8 Or a n g e t o or a n g e - r e d Up r i g h t f o r m . T h e c h e r r y w i t h t h e be s t f a l l c o l o r . Pr u n u s x h i l l i e r i ‘ S p i r e ’ Sp i r e C h e r r y 3 0 1 0 C o l u m n a r 16 0 0 6 Or a n g e r e d We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 10 of 11 Packet Page 244 of 349 Gr o u p B o t a n i c a l N a m e C o m m o n N a m e H e i g h t S p r e a d S h a p e V o l u m e S t r i p W i d t h Wi r e s F a l l C o l o r Co m m e n t s Street Tree N a t i v e T r e e Qu e r c u s I l e x Ho l l y O a k 2 0 2 0 31 0 0 5 Pr u n e t o k e e p s m a l l , l e a v e i t a l o n e to g r o w l a r g e . Rh a m n u s p u r s h i a n a Ca s c a r a 30 2 0 0 5 re d / o r a n g e St e w a r t i a p s u e d o c a m e l l i a J a p a n e s e S t e w a r 2 5 1 5 0 5 or a n g e / r e d P a t c h w o r k b a r k - w h i t e f l o w e r i n sp r i n g . St y r a x j a p o n i c a Ja p a n e s e S n o w b 2 5 2 5 28 0 0 5 Ye l l o w P l e n t i f u l , g r e e n 1 / 2 ” s e e d s . St y r a x o b a s s i a Fr a g r a n t S t y r a x 2 5 2 0 O v a l 27 0 0 5 ye l l o w S m o o t h g r a y b a r k a n d f r a g r e n t wh i t e f l o w e r s Sm a l l / C o n s t r a i n e d s i t e Ma l u s ‘ R e d B a r r o n ’ Re d B a r r o n C r a b 1 8 8 40 0 5 Ye l l o w G o o d f o r n a r r o w s p a c e s . R e d be r r i e s . Ma l u s ' L a n c e l o t ' ( ' L a n z a m ' ) L a n c e l o t C r a b a p 1 5 1 0 0 5 ye l l o w F l o w e r i s r e d i n b u d . Y e l l o w f r u i t . Di s e a s e r e s i s t a n t Pr u n u s s e r r u l a t a ‘ A m a n o g a w a ’ A m a n o g a w a F l o 2 0 6 30 0 6 Br o n z e P a r t i c u l a r l y u s e f u l f o r v e r y n a r r o w pl a n t i n g s t r i p s . So r b u s a m e r i c a n a ‘ D w a r f c r o w n R e d C a s c a d e M o 1 8 8 40 0 5 Ye l l o w - or a n g e Ni c e w i n t e r f o r m – w h i t e f l o w e r s i n sp r i n g – r e d c l u s t e r s o f b e r r i e s Tr a c h e o c a r p u s f o r t u n n i W i n d m i l l P a l m 2 5 1 0 O v a l 30 0 5 EV t r a f f i c v i s i b i l i t y c a n b e a p r o b l e m wi t h s m a l l p l a n t s We d n e s d a y , J u n e 2 5 , 2 0 0 8 Page 11 of 11 Packet Page 245 of 349 WESTGATE CODE REVIEW City Council Meeting 2014.08.26 Packet Page 246 of 349 Westgate code discussion Public hearing on August 4, 2014 Staff has reviewed the hearing record and follow-up discussions on the draft code. As part of that review, we have made suggestions to: Make sure that the code is consistent with the expressed intent. Remove inconsistencies. Approximately a dozen issues were combined into 7 Discussion topics… Packet Page 247 of 349 1. Commercial requirements Clarifying the various building types to indicate commercial requirements, especially regarding the commercial mixed use types. Building Type Residential Uses Office Uses Retail 1 Rowhouse Any floor Not allowed Not allowed 2 Courtyard Any floor Ground floor only Ground floor only 3 Stacked Dwellings Any floor Ground floor only Ground floor only 4 Live-Work Not ground floor Ground floor only Ground floor only 5 Loft Mixed Use Not ground floor Any floor Any floor 6 Side Cour t Mixed Use Not ground floor Any floor Ground floor only 7 Commercial Mixed Use Not ground floor Not ground floor Any floor Packet Page 248 of 349 2. Assuring commercial space Adjusted the Building Type Location Diagram (page 8) to be more consistent with the overall intended commercial mixed use character of Westgate. (The old diagram is included on page 9 for reference, but will be deleted if the new diagram on page 8 is preferable.) “Commercial mixed use” is not described as a “commercial block.” Packet Page 249 of 349 Packet Page 250 of 349 Adjusted two residential building types to limit them to secondary commercial locations. Packet Page 251 of 349 Adjusted the commercial mixed use building type (the principal commercial type) to allow it throughout the Westgate zone district. Packet Page 252 of 349 3. Amenity vs. Open Space Clarified the intent to provide both amenity and open space within the area, with a 15% independent requirement for each. Amenity space must be public, while open space can be public or private. In either case, each has its own requirements. Note: No other zone in the city has anything like these requirements. Packet Page 253 of 349 4. Parking standards Remember these are minimums… Added an increased parking standard (1.75 spaces per unit) for residential units that exceed 900 sq. ft. This will achieve two goals: more residential parking for larger units (that may accommodate more residents per unit) as well as providing an added incentive for smaller dwelling units. Note: 900 sq. ft. units are encouraged for affordability purposes (UW recommended). Packet Page 254 of 349 4. Parking standards (cont.) Proposed overall blended parking rate for commercial space is 1/500 sf. Existing groceries have ~1 space per 350 sf. Peak use is PM peak hour; much less during other parts of day. Current usage assumes a shared parking area Comparisons with other cities show blended parking rates vary widely; many at 1/500 (Mountlake Terrace, Bothell, Issaquah, Redmond, Kent), others at 1/400 (Bothell, Kent) or more. Some have no commercial requirement (Everett, Renton). Rates also vary by location within jurisdiction. Residential parking generally vary from 0.75 or 1.0 per unit to sometimes more for larger units. Packet Page 255 of 349 5. Large-format retail Incentives have been added for large-format retail uses (e.g. groceries, drug stores): (1) adding bonus points for large-format retail in the height bonus table (page 37). (2) a potential for 5 more feet of building height to accommodate the need for higher ceiling space in large-format retailers (the extra 5 feet is only available when a large format retail space is provided in the building -- see page 6/7). Intent is for large format retail to be retained; note existing leases/ownerships and Bartell’s interest in expanding their investment. Packet Page 256 of 349 Height Bonus Score Sheet Height Bonus to obtain 4 stories requires 8 points with points in at least 4 categories 1 Green Building Program (points are not additive) Points Required 2 Built Green*/LEED* Certified Rating or equivalent Required Credit 1 LEED* Silver / Built Green* 4-5 Rating 1 Credit 2 LEED* Gold or Evergreen Sustainable Development Rating 2 Credit 3 Passive House Standard / LEED* Platinum Rating 4 Credit 4 Living Building* 6 Green Factor (points are not additive) Points Required Green Factor Score 0.3 Required Credit 1 Green Factor Score 0.4 2 Credit 2 Green Factor Score 0.5 3 Credit 3 Green Factor Score 0.6 4 Credit 4 Green Factor Score ≥0.7 5 Amenity Space (points are not additive) Points Required Percentage of amenity space 15% Required Credit 1 Percentage of amenity space 20% 2 Credit 2 Percentage of amenity space 25% 3 Credit 3 Percentage of amenity space ≥30% 4 Alternative Transportation (points are additive) Points Required Meet street standards incl. bikeway & pedestrian networks Required Credit 1 Car-share parking3., minimum 2 spaces 1 Credit 2 Charging facility for electric cars, minimum 4 spaces 1 Credit 3 Indoor/enclosed bicycle storage and changing facilities 1 Large Format Retail Space Credit 1 Development contains one or more retail spaces >15,000 sf 3 Packet Page 257 of 349 6. Building design A series of design standards have been added, addressing such things as massing and articulation, orientation to the street, ground level details, pedestrian facades, and blank walls. This includes a 12-foot minimum ceiling height for first floor commercial space in the commercial building types. (One further change is needed… acknowledge outdoor uses such as outdoor dining space) Packet Page 258 of 349 Packet Page 259 of 349 7. Traffic and setbacks While traffic study shows no overall impact on level of service, any future development will be analyzed for detailed traffic impacts (e.g. turning movements, access points). 12 foot setback preserves options; SR-104 study will provide additional recommendations for ROW improvements. Improvements for connecting the Westgate quadrants will be part of future plans. Packet Page 260 of 349 THANK YOU! Edmonds Planning Division Packet Page 261 of 349 On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:17 PM, "Petso, Lora" wrote: To Shane, Rob, Jeff, Patrick- This is my first effort at possible amendments to the Westgate proposal. I've included a brief comment regarding the purpose of the amendments so that you can let me know if you believe the proposed amendment would help achieve the purpose. Please let me know if you find any of these something you could recommend or recommend with changes. Please let me know if you believe any of these would be very bad (and the reason). I would not want to propose an amendment that makes things worse. 1) amend 16.110.020B to increase both set backs from 12 to 20 feet (purpose: improved public space, allow for future changes in road configuration) 2) add a new section to 16.110.020B requiring a 15 foot side setback to each "lot". (purpose: assure some breaks between parcels) 3) amend 16.110.020D1 to make the commercial parking 1 to 350 not 1 to 500. (purpose: increase chances of viable and diverse commercial activity) 4) delete new height bonus paragraph in 22.110.010B and require a first floor ceiling height of at least 16 feet (purpose: increase chances of viable and diverse commercial activity) 5) add a section (g) to 22.110.050(C) stating that the first 45 feet of building depth facing a street, sidewalk, amenity space or other public area may not be used for parking. (purpose: avoid parking cars near public spaces, encourage use of such spaces for commercial) 6) add a provision that "Required setback areas, whether on protected hillsides or not, may not be counted toward Amenity Space or Green Open Space. (purpose: help avoid lot line to lot line construction, encourage additional Green Open Space even if the parcel has a protected hillside) 7) change all references to "open space" to read "green open space," and do not include non- green items such as a private balcony in the green open space total. (purpose: clarity, common sense) Packet Page 262 of 349 Date: September 19, 2014 To: City Council and Mayor From: Shane Hope, Development Services Director Subject: Responses to Westgate Zoning Questions from September 8, 2014 _____________________________________________________________________________ On September 8, Councilmembers Lora Petso and Joan Bloom met with three City staff members (Shane Hope, Rob Chave, and Patrick Doherty) about Westgate zoning questions. The following represents staff’s understanding of the questions and a response to each. 1. Does the proposed plan/zoning area have to match exactly with the Comp Plan’s Westgate area designations, versus Westgate Corridor, etc.? No. Generally, a one-to-one relation is not required between specific zones shown on the Zoning Map and the Comprehensive Plan map(s). For example, in the existing Comprehensive Plan, the Westgate center is flanked by the Westgate Corridor and Edmonds Way Corridor, while in the existing Zoning Map, these areas have various other designations. It is within the Council’s discretion to decide whether these areas should be zoned to the new proposed mixed use zone. 2. The two parcels at the south edge of the Westgate Area on 100th north of Woodway High School – are they in or out? They are “in” the rezone proposal; however, because the Comprehensive Plan map erroneously shows the two properties on the west side of 100th as single family while their actual current zoning is commercial, the City Attorney has recommended no zoning change for these two parcels until the plan map can be reviewed during the 2015 update process. 3. The Westgate Corridor Comp Plan text seems to comport with the Westgate Corridor Comp Plan Map, so why would not this new Plan have to comport with the Comp Plan map? MEMORANDUM Packet Page 263 of 349 Note: This question is similar to # 1 above. See the response there. 4. What are the setbacks for properties without street frontage? Setbacks in commercial zones are only taken from streets and adjacent residential zones. The Westgate Mixed Use zone follows this same system. 5. How do we envision the Westgate area being “walkable” with such small proposed setbacks, especially so close to the highway? The proposed setbacks, when combined with areas reserved for improvements within the right-of-way, provide room for widened sidewalks as well as separation and buffering from adjacent streets. The proposed code also requires pedestrian linkages within and between developments. 6. What is the lot line merger/elimination process? What effect does the lot line elimination process have on resultant development? Would huge, long or wide buildings result? Lot line adjustments are administrative processes, approvable by staff, subject to code requirements. This is standard practice in all cities. Lots in commercial areas reflect ownership, rather than specific building footprints—a difference from residential development patterns. 7. If the amenity space fits in the setback, and if open space fits in the hillside, then can a project be built lot line-to-lot line as wide as the lot is? In a word, no. The specific example cited was the McDonald’s restaurant property. In that case, the amenity space requirement exceeds the area of the required street setback, so additional amenity space will be required. The protected slope greatly exceeds the required open space, so the protected slope area does satisfy the open space requirement. Regardless, when lots include hillsides and setbacks, “lot line to lot line” is not an accurate description. 8. Compare/contrast with mixed-use allowable in BC and BN. BN allows “mixed use,” with a building height of 25 feet. Residential density is capped at 1 unit per lot. BC allows “mixed use,” with a building height of 30 feet. There is no residential density specified – i.e. whatever fits is OK. 9. Built Green One – Is there a checklist or standards that could be shared? See the Built Green website at: http://www.builtgreen.net/index.cfm Packet Page 264 of 349 Note that Built Green does not apply to commercial or mixed use projects, only residential ones. 10. But what if we just require hillside retention through the CAO? Wouldn’t that render this requirement moot or redundant? The Critical Areas code does not preclude building on slopes nor mandate retention of existing vegetation. That would be a change in policy and in the applicable codes. 11. What’s the advantage of trading off the Green Factor for additional height? The Green Factor is a set of landscaping requirements and is different from the Height Bonus Score Sheet found on page 37 of the draft code. Height is not traded for landscaping, but is granted for a mix of several different items that include “green” features (i.e. for providing four out of five of the following items: enhanced green building, green factor, amenity space, alternative transportation, and large retail space). 12. “Apodments”/dorm-style buildings. How do we prevent these? (Both Westgate and Hwy 99) Standards could be developed, but would logically be something that should be studied city- wide (taking into account the experience in other cities, affordability needs, etc.). No such dwelling types are located in Edmonds, and our market dynamics do not appear to support these housing types in the foreseeable future. 13. Could we establish a minimum unit size requirement for dwelling units? See response to # 12 above. 14. Can we add bulk (e.g., maximum width) requirements for buildings? This could be done, but would run counter to the expressed desire to encourage larger retail stores/spaces. It could also prevent linked development within Westgate and could make some existing commercial building non-conforming. Instead, the proposed code provides for building design and modulation requirements to mitigate bulk and scale concerns. 15. Why are we planning for “maximum development” and not “what we want”? Can’t we plan quadrant-by-quadrant, based on what we believe is most likely ready to develop, etc.? The proposal follows a long planning and code development process for the Westgate area. It contains numerous adjustments from the original proposal to reflect public input and clarify intent. The current proposal is for standards that go well beyond what is required in other commercial zones in the city in terms of specifying more clearly what is desired. This includes, for example, standards for amenity space, open space and pedestrian connections; these are not found in other zones. Packet Page 265 of 349 16. Do the Taco Bell, PCC, QFC, Key Bank, Mailbox place, Ivar’s and Goodwill sites only allow Type VII buildings? The answer is mostly yes. The “mailbox place”—the strip east of Ivar’s—allows Loft buildings too. 17. Is amenity space allowed in the setback? Yes. Note that sidewalks do not count as amenity space. Also, note from the analysis of the McDonald’s site, the amenity space requirement can be considerably larger than the setback area, thereby requiring additional area on site to be provided as amenity space. 18. Why can we not require 16’ retail ground-floor height? First, a 16-foot ground-floor height requirement would be inconsistent with anywhere else in the City. Note that the Downtown BD zones require a 15-foot minimum ground floor height in BD1 (retail core), and 12-foot minimum in the other BD zones. Secondly, while a 16-foot first floor ceiling height may be appropriate for some large-scale buildings, it may be greater than needed for other buildings. The Westgate district was planned to accommodate both larger-scale and smaller-scale buildings. 19. Can we support low-income housing in a single building versus scattered as a requirement in various buildings? Regulated low income housing is very difficult to provide as a specific percentage (for example) in individual buildings; it is typically addressed through partnerships with housing agencies or other builders with experience with those types of developments. The City has partnered in the past with the Snohomish County Housing Authority on larger projects, but not in providing individual units within buildings. Such housing usually cannot be built unless a housing agency decides to do so, acquires the property, and gets financial assistance for construction. To provide a broader range of affordable housing (including for moderate income households), the proposed Westgate zoning adds a requirement that a percentage of the residential units in a building be smaller in size (not more than 900 square feet). Packet Page 266 of 349 Dear Councilmember Bloom, I do not have anything to add to Shane’s comments below. From: <Hope>, Shane <Shane.Hope@edmondswa.gov> Date: Monday, September 15, 2014 at 4:20 PM To: Joan Bloom <joan.bloom@edmondswa.gov>, Jeffrey Taraday <jeff@lighthouselawgroup.com> Cc: "Chave, Rob" <Rob.Chave@edmondswa.gov>, "Spellman, Jana" <Jana.Spellman@edmondswa.gov> Subject: RE: Public hearing on Westgate Comp Plan text amendments Joan, I am providing you quick responses to meet your interest today. Please see my responses in red font directly after each of your questions below. Shane From: Bloom, Joan Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:14 AM To: Hope, Shane; Taraday, Jeff Cc: Chave, Rob; Spellman, Jana Subject: Public hearing on Westgate Comp Plan text amendments Shane and Jeff, My questions: (1) Does one public hearing on Westgate, as defined below (on comprehensive plan text amendment, etc) meet our public hearing requirements? Yes. (2) It appears that we never had a public hearing on the code changes proposed by the Planning Board. The Public hearing was on the Comprehensive plan amendments. Shouldn't these issues have been taken separately? At the City Council’s August 4, 2014 meeting, a public hearing was held on both. They are not required to be have public hearings on separate nights from each other. (3) Why did we talk about changing the Comp plan in advance of having a public hearing on the code changes to Westgate? The Comp Plan amendments were proposed to start the discussion because the Plan leads/guides the code. However, the City Council preferred to start with the Packet Page 267 of 349 development code, so the order was reversed to consider the more specific development code proposal first (and the proposed Comp Plan amendments after). (4) Shouldn't the August 26 meeting have been a Public hearing on the proposed zoning changes? If not, why not? The proposed zoning changes were the subject of a public hearing on August 4., the same night as the related Comp Plan amendments. Please note in Recommendations, below, the following: August 26 - Discussion of Planning Board's recommendation for proposed zoning changes related to Westgate and potential action. Packet Page 268 of 349 6544 NE 61st Street, Seattle, WA 98115 Phone: (206) 523-3939 Fax: (206) 523-4949 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Project: SR 104 Corridor Study / Westgate Redevelopment Subject: Summary of Transportation Analysis Date: June 14, 2013 Author: Jennifer Barnes, P.E. In September 2012, transportation assessment was completed that included detailed analysis at the intersection of SR 104/100th Avenue W. The analysis evaluated the potential impacts to the intersection of the proposed land use changes from Neighborhood Business to mixed-used development with higher density. The analysis studied weekday PM peak hour traffic conditions (most congested time of day at this location), and included projected traffic volumes and intersection operational analysis for the long-range planning year of 2025. To determine transportation impacts with the proposed land use density changes, the analysis compared expected future traffic volumes and intersection delay, with and without the proposed land use change. In the 2009 Comprehensive Transportation Plan, the projected 2025 traffic volumes at this intersection reflect future land use growth with the current adopted land use plan. The September 2012 analysis projected the 2025 traffic volumes with the proposed land use change. The analysis projected that an additional 461 PM peak hour trips would be generated by build-out of planned land use with the proposed change. With land use build-out under existing zoning, the SR 104/100th Avenue W intersection is projected to operate at level of service (LOS) D in 2025, with an average intersection delay of 44.6 seconds. With additional trips generated by the land use change, the intersection delay is projected to increase by about 10 seconds, but would still maintain LOS D operation. The City’s adopted level of service standard and concurrency requirement for arterials is LOS D. Local concurrency requirements do not apply to intersections along SR 104 because it is a Highway of Statewide Significance; however, the City identifies intersection deficiencies if LOS D is exceeded. The analysis showed that concurrency requirements would be met through the long-range planning year of 2025 with the proposed re-development. No additional vehicular lanes would be needed along SR 104 or 100th Avenue S. Depending on the future development proposed, additional project-level traffic analysis could be needed to determine if a road diet would be feasible along 100th Avenue S in the Westgate vicinity. Packet Page 269 of 349 6544 NE 61st Street, Seattle, WA 98115 Phone: (206) 523-3939 Fax: (206) 523-4949 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Project: Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Subject: Transportation Assessment Date: September 28, 2012 Author: Jennifer Barnes, P.E. 1. Introduction The City of Edmonds (City) is proposing to revise its Comprehensive Plan land use element to allow mixed-use development with higher densities in the Westgate and Five Corners areas. The City previously completed citywide transportation analysis to support planned future land use through the Comprehensive Plan’s long-range planning year of 2025, which is documented in the current Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Transportation Plan).1 This memorandum presents the analysis of the potential transportation impact of the proposed land use policy changes. The City’s proposal is a non-project action; therefore, the transportation analysis presented in this memorandum reflects a programmatic assessment of its potential effect on the City’s long range transportation plan. Analysis is provided for the weekday PM peak hour condition, which reflects the most congested hour of a typical week, and is the analysis period on which the City’s concurrency program is based. 2. Relevent Legislation 2.1. Growth Management Act Transportation planning at the state, county and local levels is governed by the Growth Management Act (GMA). Requirements for the transportation element of a Comprehensive Plan are codified in Chapter 36.70A.070(6) of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). In addition to requiring con- sistency with the land use element, the GMA requires that the following components be included in transportation elements: Inventory of facilities by mode of transport; Level of service assessment to aid in determining the existing and future operating conditions of the facilities; Proposed actions to bring these deficient facilities into compliance; Traffic forecasts, based upon planned future land use; 1 City of Edmonds, Comprehensive Transportation Plan, 2011. Packet Page 270 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 2 - September 28, 2012 Identification of infrastructure needs to meet current and future demands; Funding analysis for needed improvements, as well as possible additional funding sources; Identification of intergovernmental coordination efforts; and Identification of demand management strategies as available. In addition to these elements, GMA mandates that new development cannot occur unless adequate supporting infrastructure either already exists or is built concurrent with development (the concurrency timeframe is defined as the six-year period from the time the need for improvement is triggered). In addition to capital facilities, infrastructure may include transit service, Transportation Demand Man- agement (TDM) strategies, or Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies. Under the GMA, local governments and agencies must annually prepare and adopt six-year Transportation Improvement Programs (TIPs). These programs must be consistent with the transportation element of the local com- prehensive plan, and other state and regional plans and policies. The City’s current Comprehensive Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan, and presents transportation analysis and transportation improvement projects to support its future land use plan, consistent with GMA requirements. 2.2. State Environmental Policy Act The proposed changes to the City zoning code are a non-project action subject to the State Environ- mental Policy Act (SEPA), which is codified under the RCW 43.21C, and Chapter 197-11 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). The analysis presented in this memorandum provides trans- portation impact analysis of the proposed changes to the City’s land use plan needed to support SEPA for a non-project action. 3. Land Use Assessment The City is proposing revisions to its land use code that would allow higher density mixed use development in (1) the Five Corners neighborhood, surrounding the five-legged intersection of Main Street, Bowdoin Way, 212th Street SW, and 84th Avenue W, and (2) the Westgate neighborhood, surrounding the intersection of Edmonds Way (State Route [SR] 104) and 100th Avenue W. For each of the two study areas, Table 1 summarizes the existing land use, projected 2025 land use that was analyzed in the Transportation Plan, and the 2025 land use that has been projected with the proposed land use policy changes. The projections assume build-out of the proposed land use concepts by 2025; this is a conservative representation of future conditions because it reflects the highest number of additional trips that could result from future redevelopment. It is likely that if the land use policy changes are adopted, complete redevelopment would not occur by 2025. The table shows that in the Five Corners area, the proposed land use policy changes could result in a higher level of retail, but lower levels of residential and office development than what was analyzed in the Transportation Plan. In the Westgate area, residential, retail and office development are all projected to be higher with the proposed policy changes than the land use analyzed in the Transportation Plan. Packet Page 271 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 3 - September 28, 2012 Table 1. Land Use Summary Land Use Type Single Family Residential (dwelling units) Multi-family Residential (dwelling units) Retail (square feet) Office (square feet) Church (square feet) Five Corners Existing 1 4 4 30,760 17,378 12,192 2025 Projected in Transportation Plan 2 4 114 40,560 51,428 12,192 2025 Projected with Land Use Change 3 --- 95 98,795 33,331 --- Westgate Existing 1 7 2 193,993 44,446 --- 2025 Projected in Transportation Plan 2 7 13 201,175 52,302 --- 2025 Projected with Land Use Change 4 --- 204 336,800 167,600 --- 1. Source: Snohomish County Assessor, 2012. 2. Source: City of Edmonds, Comprehensive Transportation Plan, 2009. 3. Source: City of Edmonds, Five Corners Concept Plan, 2012. 4. Source: City of Edmonds, Westgate Concept Plan, 2012. 4. Trip Generation Assessment To evaluate the potential localized effects of the land use policy change on future roadway operations, the resulting change in vehicle trips generated within the subarea was estimated for the weekday PM peak hour, which is the most congested hour during a typical week, and the analysis period on which the City’s concurrency program is based. This section presents the estimate of additional trips projected to result from the proposed land use changes compared to the projected land use that was analyzed in the Transportation Plan. These estimates provide the basis for determining the potential transportation impacts of the proposed policy change. The methodologies used to determine the trips account for the location of the study area neighborhoods, their proximity to transit, and the walkability promoted in the pedestrian-focused elements of the redevelopment concepts. As a result, the traffic estimates reflect the expectation that some of the trips would occur by modes other than single-occupant vehicles. The methodology also accounts for the mixed-use character of the concepts that would keep some trips internal to the site. For over a decade, Heffron Transportation has utilized a trip generation methodology for urban mixed-use development projects that adjusts typical suburban Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates to account for urban characteristics and variety of modal choices for subject properties. This methodology accounts for each site’s local characteristics related to transit use, carpooling, walking, and bicycling. For mixed-use projects, it also accounts for trips that occur between uses on a site. The analysis methodology relies on future forecasts from the City’s travel demand forecasting model as well as data provided by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), and produces estimates of peak hour vehicle trips, transit trips, and non-motorized trips that are necessary for transportation impact analyses. Packet Page 272 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 4 - September 28, 2012 4.1. Summary of Heffron Transportation Trip Generation Methodology Trip generation for new projects is typically determined using rates and equations in Trip Genera- tion.2 This reference manual summarizes the results of numerous traffic studies throughout the coun- try for a variety of land-use types. The Trip Generation User’s Guide states on page 1: “The average trip generation rates in this report represent weighted averages of studies conducted throughout the United States and Canada since the 1960s. Data were primarily col- lected at suburban locations having little or no transit service, nearby pedestrian amenities, or travel demand management (TDM) programs. At specific sites, the user may wish to modify trip generation rates presented in this document to reflect the presence of public transportation services, ridesharing, or other TDM measures, enhanced pedestrian and bicycle trip-making opportunities, or other special characteristics of the site or surrounding area.” Thus, as recommended in Trip Generation, the ITE trip generation rates were adjusted to account for the sites’ proximity to transit and proposed mix of land uses. The following methodology was used to adjust the trip generation rates to account for internal trips among uses at the site, transit and non- motorized modes of travel, and also to account for vehicle trips generated by the site that would already be traveling on the roadway network. 1. The total number of “person trips” generated by each major land use category (residential, office, and retail) was determined using trip generation rates and equations from ITE’s Trip Generation, plus information about the average number of persons per vehicle assumed in the ITE rates. These person trips reflect all trips generated by a land use component by all modes of travel including transit, bike, and foot. It also reflects the trips made between on-site uses. 2. Internal trips between on-site uses were estimated using the methodology pre- sented in Chapter 7 of the Trip Generation Handbook.3 An office worker who makes a lunchtime trip to an on-site restaurant, or a resident who makes a trip to an on-site retail shop, are examples of internal trips. The internal trips are assumed to occur on foot within each of the Five Corners and Westgate areas. 3. The mode of travel used for off-site trips was determined based on PSRC’s compilation of 2000 Census data summarizing mode shares for residents and employees within the areas where the project sites are located. The retail rates were estimated based on the assumption that a small portion of the retail trips would also occur by transit or non-motorized modes. 4. Person trips by automobile were converted back to vehicle trips based on local data about the average number of persons per vehicle in the study areas. 5. Total vehicle trips were separated into “pass-by” trips (trips already on the roadway network) and “primary” trips (new trips generated by the site), utilizing procedures in the Trip Generation Handbook.4 2 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008. 3 Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, June 2004. 4 Ibid. Packet Page 273 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 5 - September 28, 2012 Details for each of these steps are provided in the following sections, and detailed trip calculations are provided in Attachment A. The same methodologies were applied to the Transportation Plan projected land use (referred to as the Baseline scenario) and to the projected land use with the proposed policy changes (referred to as the Rezone scenario). The difference in net new trips in the Rezone scenario, compared to the Baseline scenario, reflect the additional trips projected to result from the proposed policy changes. 4.2. Trip Rates ITE trip generation rates and equations were used as the basis for determining the number of person trips. Person trips are the total number of trips made by all modes of travel, including passengers in cars, buses, on bikes or on foot. The person trips were determined by applying an average-vehicle- occupancy (AVO) factor to the ITE vehicle trips for each land use. The ITE vehicle trip rates and the assumed AVO factors for each land use are summarized in Table 2. Table 2. ITE Trip Generation Rates ITE Code Land Use PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Rate 1 % Inbound 1 % Outbound 1 AVO 210 Single Family Residential 1.01 trips/dwelling unit 63% 37% 1.20 2 220 Multifamily Residential 0.62 trips/dwelling unit 65% 35% 1.20 3 560 Church 0.55 trips/1,000 sf 48% 52% 1.20 2 710 General Office 1.49 trips/1,000 sf 17% 83% 1.10 4 820 Retail 3.73 trips/1,000 sf 49% 51% 1.20 5 1. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition, 2008. 2. Heffron estimate, based on past experience with similar developments. 3. Final Report on Improved Vehicle Occupancy Data Collection Methods, Battelle, April 1997. 4. Based on AVO rate published for Single-Tenant Office Building (LU 715) ITE's Trip Generation (ITE, 8th Edition, 2008). 5. Based on AVOs for other retail in ITE's Trip Generation (ITE, 8th Edition, 2008). 4.3. Internal Trips The total number of trips generated by a site includes “internal trips,” or trips made between one use on the site and another use on the site. Chapter 7 of the Trip Generation Handbook 5 is dedicated to estimating trip generation for multi-use developments, and provides a methodology to estimate the number of internal trips that can be expected at specific types of sites. This method is based on the type and size of various land uses. The more balanced the mix of uses, the higher the percentage of internal trips. Developments with a predominance of one type of use (e.g., mostly office, or mostly residential) typically have few or no internal trips. Each of the subareas evaluated are small enough that all internal trips were assumed to occur on foot. ITE’s methodology to determine internal trips has four steps: 1. Determine the number of trips generated by each land use as if each was on a separate site. 5 Ibid. Packet Page 274 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 6 - September 28, 2012 2. Determine the number of internal trips from capture rates provided in the Trip Generation Handbook. 3. Balance the number of internal trips to and from all land uses at the site. 4. Subtract internal person trips based on the percentages determined. The Trip Generation Handbook provides internal trip capture percentages for retail, office, and resi- dential uses for PM peak hour conditions, which were applied for the trip calculations within each of the two study areas. 4.4. Mode of Travel The mode of travel percentages were derived from Journey-to-Work survey results from the year 2000 Census compiled by the PSRC for residents and employees in the zones in which the two study areas are located. Table 3 summarizes the mode shares for the two study areas, which were applied to the estimated person trips. The “Residents” mode shares were applied to projected residential trips and the “Employee” mode shares were applied to projected office trips. Retail trips were assumed to have the same mode shares as residential trips. It should be noted that the redevelopment concepts for both study areas are designed to encourage higher use of alternative modes. Therefore, it is likely that transit and non-motorized use at the sites would be higher than the historical averages for the areas in which they are located, and that the estimated vehicle mode share based on these averages is conservative. Table 3. Mode-of-Travel Assumptions Five Corners 1 Westgate 2 Mode of Travel Residents Employees Residents Employees Drive Alone 79.4% 80.2% 74.0% 75.8% Carpool 9.5% 9.4% 10.0% 11.0% Transit 5.5% 0.6% 7.5% 1.7% Non-Motorized 1.3% 2.2% 2.6% 3.0% Other (e.g., work from home) 4.3% 7.6% 5.9% 8.5% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Average Vehicle Occupancy 3 1.06 1.06 1.07 1.07 1. Source: PSRC, Journey-to-Work data from 2000 U.S. Census, Data for Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) 576 and 577. 2. Source: PSRC, Journey-to-Work data from 2000 U.S. Census, Data for TAZs 578, 580, and 581. 3. Derived from Journey-to-Work dataset, which included sizes of carpools. The “person trips by automobile” for residential and office uses were converted back to vehicle trips by applying the AVO for residents and employees in the study areas, based also on PSRC Journey-to- Work data and shown in Table 3. Person trips generated by the retail and church uses were converted to vehicle trips by applying the AVOs presented in Table 2. 4.5. Trip Components There are two types of trips—primary and pass-by trips—which reflect the traffic impact characteris- tics associated with the retail element of the proposed mixed-use land uses. Packet Page 275 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 7 - September 28, 2012 Pass-by Trips are already on the roadway network on the way to another destination. For example, a trip to a retail store at Westgate during a trip home from work that uses SR 104 would be a pass-by trip. Primary (New) Trips are single-purpose trips generated by the retail or other land use types. New trips are generally assumed to begin and end at home, although some new trips could originate at work or other locations. Pass-by trips would affect driveway volumes at the specific site access points, but do not represent new trips on the citywide roadway network. Because the proposed land use policy change is a non- project action, the programmatic transportation analysis only considers the potential effect of additional primary (new) trips on the transportation system. Driveway traffic volumes would be evaluated at the project level, as a condition of approval for specific development proposals. The average pass-by trip percentage of 34% published in the Trip Generation Handbook6 for Shopping Centers (Land Use 820) was applied to the projected retail development within the Five Corners and Westgate areas. The remaining percentages of retail trips would be considered new to study area roadways and intersections. The residential and office uses were assumed not to generate pass-by trips. 4.6. Vehicle Trip Generation Summary All of the methods described above were applied to project the number of vehicle trips that would result from the proposed policy changes in the Five Corners and Westgate area, compared to the trips projected for these areas in the Transportation Plan analysis. Detailed trip generation tables for the Five Corners and Westgate areas are provided in Attachment A. Table 4 presents the total vehicle trips that are projected to result from the proposed policy changes at the two sites. The table shows that for the Five Corners area, about 66 additional PM peak hour primary trips are projected to be generated in 2025 with the proposed land use policy changes, compared to the projections analyzed in the Transportation Plan. In the Westgate area, about 461 additional PM peak hour primary trips are projected. 4.7. Trip Distribution and Roadway Network Assignment The inbound and outbound trip distribution patterns for this project were derived from trip origin and destination data obtained from the City of Edmonds travel demand forecasting model. In the Five Corners area, trip distribution data were compiled for Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) 24, 27, 30, 31 and 32. In the Westgate area, data were compiled for TAZs 15, 35, 48 and 49. These TAZs all include some portion of the two study areas. Net new vehicle trips projected to result from the land use policy change were assigned to the roadway network according to the derived trip distribution patterns. To estimate future traffic volumes with the proposed land use policy changes, the forecasted net changes traffic generated by the two study sites were added to the 2025 traffic volumes projected in the Transportation Plan. 6 Institute of Transportation Engineers, June 2004, Figure 5.5. Packet Page 276 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 8 - September 28, 2012 Table 4. Vehicle Trip Generation Summary Five Corners Westgate Land Use In Out Total In Out Total Rezone Scenario Retail - Primary Trips 96 103 199 319 337 656 Office - Primary Trips 6 37 43 28 189 217 Residential - Primary Trips 26 11 37 52 19 71 Total Primary Trips 128 151 279 399 545 944 Total (Retail) Pass-By Trips 52 52 104 169 169 338 Total Rezone Scenario Vehicle Trips 180 203 383 568 714 1282 Baseline Scenario Retail - Primary Trips 39 38 77 197 211 408 Office - Primary Trips 13 66 79 9 56 65 Residential - Primary Trips 39 18 57 9 1 10 Total Primary Trips 91 122 213 215 268 483 Total (Retail) Pass-By Trips 20 20 40 105 105 210 Total 111 142 253 320 373 693 Net New Vehicle Trips Retail - Primary Trips 57 65 122 122 126 248 Office - Primary Trips -7 -29 -36 19 133 152 Residential - Primary Trips -13 -7 -20 43 18 61 Net New Primary Trips 37 29 66 184 277 461 Net New (Retail) Pass-By Trips 32 32 64 64 64 128 Total Vehicle Trips 69 61 130 248 341 589 Source: Heffron Transportation, September 2012. 5. Traffic Operations Assessment Traffic operations are evaluated by intersection level of service, which is a qualitative measure used to characterize traffic operating conditions. Six letter designations, “A” through “F,” are used to define level of service. LOS A and B represent the lowest level of traffic congestion, and LOS C and D represent intermediate traffic flow with some delay. LOS E indicates that traffic conditions are at or approaching congested conditions and LOS F indicates that traffic conditions are at a high level of congestion with unstable traffic flow. Attachment B presents the level of service criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Packet Page 277 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 9 - September 28, 2012 Levels of service for signalized and stop-controlled intersections were calculated using methodologies based on those presented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM).7 All level of service calculations for conventional intersections were performed using Trafficware’s Synchro 7.0 analysis software, consistent with the analysis presented in the Transportation Plan. Results for were reported using the HCM Signalized and Unsignalized modules. Operation of the planned future roundabout at the Five Corners intersection was evaluated using SIDRA analysis software. Attachment B includes the level of service reports completed for this study. Under GMA, concurrency is the requirement that adequate infrastructure be planned and financed to support the City’s adopted future land use plan. Level of service standards are used to evaluate the transportation impacts of long-term growth and concurrency. In order to monitor concurrency, the jurisdictions adopt acceptable roadway operating conditions that are then used to measure existing and projected future traffic conditions and identify deficiencies. Table 5 summarizes the City’s adopted level of service standards. Table 5. City of Edmonds Level of Service Standards Facility Standard City Streets Arterials: LOS D or better (except state routes); Collectors: LOS C or better. State Routes1 SR 99 north of SR 104; SR 524: LOS E or better. 1. State routes for which a standard is designated are Highways of Regional Significance, and are subject to City concurrency requirements. State routes designated as Highways of Statewide Significance (SR 104, and SR 99 south of SR 104) are not subject to concurrency and thus no City standard is defined for these facilities. However, to monitor operations on Highways of Statewide Significance, the City identifies existing or potential future deficiencies if the WSDOT standard of LOS D is exceeded. Table 6 summarizes the 2025 level of service projected to result with build-out of the City’s adopted land use plan and the proposed land use policy changes. The analysis assumed completion of the City’s planned transportation improvement projects that have been identified through 2025, which are summarized in Attachment C. The levels of service with projected volumes in the Transportation Plan are provided for comparison. As shown, the highest increase in average delayabout 10 secondsis expected to occur at the intersection of Edmonds Way/100th Avenue W. This is not surprising since the intersection is located in the center of the Westgate area. However, the intersection is projected to still operate at a high LOS D with the land use changes. An increase in average delay of about 6 seconds is projected at 238th Street/SR 99, but the intersection is expected to still operate at LOS C with the land use changes. At all other City analysis intersections the proposed land use policy changes are projected to add about 0 to 3 seconds of average delay. All City analysis intersections are projected to operate within their adopted level of service standards with the proposed land use policy changes. It is noted that the results in Table 6 assume that Edmonds Way/100th Avenue W would maintain its existing geometry. However, the Westgate redevelopment concept includes a proposed “road diet” on 100th Avenue W that would remove one general purpose lane in each direction and convert that space to bicycle and parking lanes. The operational implication of reducing vehicle capacity on 100th Avenue W is discussed in the following section. 7 Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Packet Page 278 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 10 - September 28, 2012 Table 6. 2025 Level of Service with Planned Transportation Plan Improvements LOS Standard Projected Volumes in Transportation Plan Projected Volumes with Policy Change Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay Stop Controlled 1 174th Street SW/Olympic View Drive D C 22.1 C 22.1 Signalized 2 Olympic View Drive/76th Avenue W D B 12.3 B 12.4 3 196th Street SW/76th Avenue W D D 47.2 D 48.1 4 Puget Drive (SR 524)/88th Avenue W E A 8.1 A 8.1 5 Puget Drive/Olympic View Drive D B 19.7 B 20.0 6 Caspers Street/9th Avenue N (SR 524) E B 12.7 B 13.4 7 208th Street SW/76th Avenue W D B 18.0 B 18.1 8 212th Street SW/SR 99 E E 79.6 E 80.0 9 212th Street SW/76th Avenue W D D 53.5 D 54.6 11 Main Street/9th Avenue N D B 15.7 B 17.0 12 Walnut Street/9th Avenue S D A 9.4 B 10.2 13 Main Street/3rd Avenue N (SR 524) E A 9.4 A 9.5 14 220th Street SW/SR 99 E E 62.3 E 63.7 15 220th Street SW/76th Avenue W D D 52.2 D 53.2 16 220th Street SW/84th Avenue W D B 11.2 B 11.7 17 220th Street SW/9th Avenue S D B 14.0 B 14.6 18 Edmonds Way (SR 104)/100th Ave W (1) D 44.6 D 54.3 19 238th Street SW/SR 99 E C 32.9 C 38.6 20 238th St SW/Edmonds Way (SR 104) (1) B 11.1 B 14.4 21 244th Street SW (SR 104)/76th Ave W (1) D 52.5 D 54.5 22 244th Street SW (SR 104)/SR 99 2 (1) D 45.9 D 46.4 23 238th Street SW/100th Avenue W D B 18.5 B 19.0 24 238th Street SW/Firdale Avenue D C 26.8 C 26.9 Roundabout 10 212th Street SW/84th Avenue W D A 10.0 B 11.0 LOS = Level of service; Delay = average seconds of delay per vehicle. 1. State routes designated as Highways of Statewide Significance are not subject to concurrency and thus no City standard is defined for these facilities. However, to monitor operations on Highways of Statewide Significance (SR 104, and SR 99 south of SR 104), the City identifies existing or potential future deficiencies if LOS D is exceeded. 2. Shared jurisdiction with WSDOT and the City of Shoreline; improvement of this intersection is included in the final phase of the City of Shoreline’s Aurora Corridor Improvement Project, N 165th Street to N 205th Street, which is planned to begin construction in 2013. Packet Page 279 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 11 - September 28, 2012 6. Effect of Vehicle Capacity Reduction on 100th Avenue W As mentioned in the previous section, the City’s design concept for redevelopment of the Westgate area includes a potential road diet on 100th Avenue W at Edmonds Way, which would reduce the existing five-lane section (two general purpose traffic lanes in each direction with a center left-turn lane) to a three-lane section. A general purpose traffic lane would be removed in each direction, and converted to a bicycle and parking lanes. Analysis indicates that with the 2025 projected traffic volumes at Edmonds Way/100th Avenue W, this reduction in vehicle capacity would degrade the intersection operation from LOS D to LOS F. However, there are strategies that could be explored at the site-specific level to balance reduced intersection capacity with vehicle demand through the intersection. For example, the Westgate design concept includes addition of an internal access roadway between 100th Avenue W and Edmonds Way (northeast of the intersection, roughly parallel to Edmonds Way) that would allow vehicles to travel within the site, without having to turn onto Edmonds Way or travel through the Edmonds Way/100th Avenue W intersection. Depending on the specific development that is proposed, there could also be some opportunity to implement transportation demand management strategies that would reduce vehicular trips within the area. It is also possible that the 100th Avenue W intersection could remain wider at the intersection, with lanes that drop to a narrower section away from the intersection. This is similar to the current configuration of 100th Avenue W north of Edmonds Way, where the outside vehicle lanes transition to parking lanes a couple of blocks north of the intersection; however, the reduced general purpose lanes could possibly begin farther south, and also be provided on the south side of Edmonds Way. In order for the road diet to result in acceptable operations at Edmonds Way/100th Avenue W, it would likely need to be combined with one or more of these types of strategies to balance intersection capacity with vehicle demand through the intersection, and would require detailed project-level analysis. The City would also need to work with WSDOT to move forward with any project that would potentially affect operation on Edmonds Way (SR104), which is a Highway of Statewide Significance. It is not recommended that the proposed roadway cross section be adopted into City design standards until detailed TDM and/or TSM strategies are developed, and detailed project-level analysis of the effect of those strategies is completed. However, it would be consistent with the Transportation Plan for the City to adopt a policy stating its desire to develop strategies that would support implementation of the road diet project along 100th Avenue W. 7. Effect on Transit and Non-Motorized Operations Community Transit provides bus transit service to both study areas. In the Five Corners area, Route 115 provides daily service between Mill Creek, Lynnwood, Edmonds, Shoreline, and Mountlake Terrace; Route 116 provides daily service between Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mill Creek. In the Westgate area, Route 130 provides daily local bus service between Edmonds, Shoreline, Mountlake Terrace, and Lynnwood; Route 416 provides weekday commuter service between Edmonds and downtown Seattle. These bus routes also provide connections to other bus and rail routes that serve regional destinations. As shown in Attachment A, transit and non-motorized trips are expected to be generated by future new development in the Five Corners and Westgate areas. With the proposed land use policy changes, Packet Page 280 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 12 - September 28, 2012 a total of about 24 transit trips and 120 non-motorized trips (including internal trips, external walking and biking trips, and trips to and from transit stops) are projected to be generated during the PM peak hour by the Five Corners development. In the Westgate area, about 120 trips and 430 non-motorized trips are projected. Both areas are served by existing bus service, and have complete sidewalks on their major streets. Improvements to sidewalks and other non-motorized amenities would also likely be required as a condition of permit approval, as redevelopment occurs. In the Westgate area, it may be desirable to provide bus pull-outs on Edmonds Way as frontage improvement to new development, so that buses may stop outside of the vehicle traffic flow. It is expected that transit and non-motorized demand would be accommodated by existing and future infrastructure and services. The Transportation Plan provides detailed assessment of existing transit and non-motorized conditions, as well as future recommended transit and non-motorized projects. Development in the Five Corners and Westgate areas would not affect the recommended non- motorized improvements and transit recommendations provided in the Transportation Plan, and therefore are consistent with the Transportation Plan analysis. 8. Effect on Site Access, Circulation and Parking The proposed land use policy changes are a non-project action and do not include specific development proposals. Site access, internal circulation, and parking are site-specific characteristics that are more detailed than the transportation policies and analyses presented in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. If the proposed land use policy changes are approved, new development would be subject to applicable City design standards and parking requirements as condition for approval. Nevertheless, it is recognized that depending on the mix of uses that are developed, there could be opportunities for reduced parking requirements through shared parking. For example, parking could potentially be shared between residents who use their cars during the day but need to park in the evening, and office employees or retail customers who park during the day but not in the evening. As discussed previously, mixed land uses could also encourage more non-motorized trips, particularly between uses within the site. Thus, site access and internal circulation will likely need to consider all modes of travel, maximizing mobility and reducing the potential for conflicts between pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. 9. Consistency with Transportation Plan Policies The proposed land use policy changes are consistent with Transportation Plan policies. Specifically, the higher density and mixed use development that would be encouraged by the policy changes would promote conservation and sustainability through encouraging alternative modes such as walking, biking, and transit. In addition, transportation policies call for design of complete streets that serve automobile, transit, pedestrian and bicycle travel. Policies to encourage higher density mixed use development in the Five Corners and Westgate areas would also support transportation system efficiency by encouraging development where adequate transportation facilities exist, and providing for a greater number of walking and biking trips between uses on-site. Packet Page 281 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 13 - September 28, 2012 10. Conclusions Following is summary of the key findings of the transportation analysis for the proposed land use policy changes. Build-out of projected land use with the proposed policy changes is expected to generate about 66 additional PM peak hour primary trips in the Five Corners area compared to the 2025 volumes that were analyzed in the Transportation Plan. Build-out of projected land use with the proposed policy changes is expected to generate about 461 additional PM peak hour primary trips in the Westgate area compared to the 2025 volumes that were analyzed in the Transportation Plan. Build-out of projected land use with the proposed policy changes is expected to add about 10 seconds of average vehicle delay at Edmonds Way/100th Avenue W in 2025, compared to the Transportation Plan analysis. However, the intersection is projected to still operate at a high LOS D with the existing intersection geometry in place. At all other City analysis intersections, the build-out of land use with the proposed land use policy changes is projected to add zero to 6 seconds of average delay in 2025, compared to the Transportation Plan analysis. All City analysis intersections are projected to operate within their adopted level of service standards with the proposed land use policy change and planned citywide transportation improvements identified in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Analysis indicates that with the 2025 projected traffic volumes at Edmonds Way/100th Avenue W, the proposed road diet on 100th Avenue W would degrade the intersection operation from LOS D to LOS F. However, there are strategies that could be explored at the site-specific level to balance reduced intersection capacity with vehicle demand through the intersection, including addition of an internal access roadway between 100th Avenue W and Edmonds Way, transportation demand management strategies, or an intersection configuration in which 100th Avenue W remains wider at the intersection, with lanes that drop to a narrower section away from the intersection. In order for the road diet to result in acceptable operations at Edmonds Way/100th Avenue, it would likely need to be combined with strategies to reduce the vehicle demand through the intersection, and would require detailed project-level traffic analysis. The City would also need to work with WSDOT to move forward with any project that would affect operation on Edmonds Way (SR104), which is a Highway of Statewide Significance. It would be consistent with the Transportation Plan for the City to adopt a policy stating its desire to develop strategies that would support implementation of the road diet project along 100th Avenue W. However, it is not recommended that the proposed roadway cross section be adopted into City design standards until detailed TDM and/or TSM strategies are developed, and detailed project-level analysis of the effect of those strategies is completed. Transit and non-motorized trips are expected to be generated by future new development in the Five Corners and Westgate areas. It is expected that transit and non-motorized demand would be accommodated by existing and future infrastructure and services, and would not affect the recommended non-motorized improvements and transit recommendations provided in the Transportation Plan. Packet Page 282 of 349 Edmonds Westgate/Five Corners Land Use Policy Change Transportation Assessment - 14 - September 28, 2012 The proposed land use policy changes are a non-project action and do not include specific development proposals. Site access, internal circulation, and parking are site-specific characteristics that are more detailed than the transportation policies and analyses presented in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. If the proposed land use policy changes are approved, new development would be subject to applicable City design standards and parking requirements as condition for approval. Nevertheless, it is recognized that depending on the mix of uses that are developed, there could be opportunities for reduced parking requirements through shared parking, and that site access and internal circulation will likely need to consider all modes of travel, maximizing mobility and reducing the potential for conflicts between pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. The proposed land use policy changes are consistent with Transportation Plan policies, specifically those that encourage alternative modes such as walking, biking, and transit. They also support transportation system efficiency policies by encouraging development where adequate transportation facilities exist, and providing for a greater number of walking and biking trips between uses on-site. Packet Page 283 of 349 ATTACHMENT A TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS Packet Page 284 of 349 Trip Generation Summary:Edmonds Five Corners Rezone-Total Study Area REZONE SCENARIO Total Person Trips - Rezone Scenario PM Peak Hour Person Trip Summary Size Daily In Out Total Retail (LU 820) 98,795 sf 5,090 217 225 442 General Office (LU 710) 33,331 sf 400 9 46 55 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) 95 dwelling units 760 46 25 71 Total All Person Trips 6,250 272 296 568 Internal Trips 694 35 35 70 % Internal Trips 11.1% External Trips 5,556 237 261 498 External Person Trips by Mode - Rezone Scenario Percent PM Peak Hour Land Use/Mode Share Mode Share Daily In Out Total Retail (LU 820) Walk or Bicycle Trips 5.7%270 11 12 23 Transit Trips 5.5%260 11 11 22 Person Trips by Vehicle 88.8%4,217 178 185 363 Total 100.0%4,747 200 208 408 General Office (LU 710) Walk or Bicycle Trips 2.2%10 0 1 1 Transit Trips 0.6%00 00 Person Trips by Vehicle 97.2%312 6 40 46 Total 100.0%322 6 41 47 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) Walk, Bicycle, or Other Trips 5.7%30 2 0 2 Transit Trips 5.5%30 2 0 2 Person Trips by Vehicle 88.8%427 27 12 39 Total 100.0%487 31 12 43 Total Project Person Trips Walk, Bicycle or Other 310 13 13 26 Transit Trips 290 13 11 24 Person Trips by Vehicle 4,956 211 237 448 Total 5,556 237 261 498 Vehicle Trips by Component - Rezone Scenario Percent of PM Peak Hour Land Use/Trip Component Type Trips Daily In Out Total AVO Retail (LU 820)1.20 Primary Trips 66%2,320 96 103 199 Pass-by Trips 34%1,190 52 52 104 Total 100%3,510 148 155 303 General Office (LU 710) Primary Trips 100%300 6 37 43 1.06 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%300 6 37 43 Multifamily Residential (LU 220)1.06 Primary Trips 100%400 26 11 37 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%400 26 11 37 Total Project - Vehicle Trips Primary Trips 3,020 128 151 279 Pass-by Trips 1,190 52 52 104 Total Project Trips 4,210 180 203 383 12.3% Trip Generation Summary Page 1 8/21/2012 Packet Page 285 of 349 Trip Generation Summary:Edmonds Five Corners Rezone-Total Study Area BASELINE SCENARIO Total Person Trips - Baseline Scenario PM Peak Hour Person Trip Summary Size Daily In Out Total Retail (LU 820) 40,560 sf 2,090 89 93 182 General Office (LU 710) 51,428 sf 620 14 70 84 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) 114 dwelling units 910 55 30 85 Single Family Residential (LU 210) 4 dwelling units 50 3 2 5 Church (LU 560) 12,192 sf 130 4 4 8 Total All Person Trips 3,800 165 199 364 Internal Trips 588 26 26 52 % Internal Trips 15.5% External Trips 3,219 139 173 312 External Person Trips by Mode - Baseline Scenario Percent PM Peak Hour Land Use/Mode Share Mode Share Daily In Out Total Retail (LU 820) Walk or Bicycle Trips 5.7%100 4 5 9 Transit Trips 5.5%100 4 5 9 Person Trips by Vehicle 88.8%1,608 71 69 140 Total 100.0%1,808 79 79 158 General Office (LU 710) Walk or Bicycle Trips 2.2%10 0 2 2 Transit Trips 0.6%00 00 Person Trips by Vehicle 97.2%531 11 65 76 Total 100.0%541 11 67 78 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) Walk, Bicycle, or Other Trips 5.7%40 2 2 4 Transit Trips 5.5%40 2 2 4 Person Trips by Vehicle 88.8%615 39 18 57 Total 100.0%695 43 22 65 Single Family Residential (LU 210) Walk or Bicycle Trips 5.7%00 00 Transit Trips 5.5%00 00 Person Trips by Vehicle 88.8%45 2 1 3 Total 100.0%45 2 1 3 Church (LU 560) Walk or Bicycle Trips 0.0%00 00 Transit Trips 0.0%00 00 Person Trips by Vehicle 100.0%130 4 4 8 Total 100.0%130 4 4 8 Total Project Person Trips Walk, Bicycle or Other 150 6 9 15 Transit Trips 140 6 7 13 Person Trips by Vehicle 2,929 127 157 284 Total 3,219 139 173 312 Vehicle Trips by Component - Baseline Scenario Percent of PM Peak Hour Land Use/Trip Component Type Trips Daily In Out Total AVO Retail (LU 820)1.20 Primary Trips 66%880 39 38 77 Pass-by Trips 34%460 20 20 40 Total 100%1,340 59 58 117 General Office (LU 710)1.06 Primary Trips 100%500 10 62 72 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%500 10 62 72 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) Primary Trips 100%580 37 17 54 1.06 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%580 37 17 54 Single Family Residential (LU 210) Primary Trips 100%40 2 1 3 1.06 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%40 2 1 3 Church (LU 560) Primary Trips 100%110 3 4 7 1.20 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%110 3 4 7 Total Project - Vehicle Trips Primary Trips 2,110 91 122 213 Pass-by Trips 460 20 20 40 Total Project Trips 2,570 111 142 253 14.3% Trip Generation Summary Page 2 8/21/2012 Packet Page 286 of 349 Trip Generation Summary:Edmonds Five Corners Rezone-Total Study Area NET NEW TRIPS Net New Vehicle Trips PM Peak Hour Land Use Daily In Out Total Rezone Scenario Retail - Primary Trips 2,320 96 103 199 Office - Primary Trips 300 6 37 43 Residential - Primary Trips 400 26 11 37 Total Primary Trips 3,020 128 151 279 Total (Retail) Pass-By Trips 1,190 52 52 104 Total Rezone Scenario Vehicle Trips 4,210 180 203 383 Baseline Scenario Retail - Primary Trips 880 39 38 77 Office - Primary Trips 610 13 66 79 Residential - Primary Trips 620 39 18 57 Total Primary Trips 2,110 91 122 213 Total (Retail) Pass-By Trips 460 20 20 40 Total 2,570 111 142 253 Net New Vehicle Trips Retail - Primary Trips 1,440 57 65 122 Office - Primary Trips -310 -7 -29 -36 Residential - Primary Trips -220 -13 -7 -20 Net New Primary Trips 910 37 29 66 Net New (Retail) Pass-By Trips 730 32 32 64 Total 1,640 69 61 130 Trip Generation Summary Page 3 8/21/2012 Packet Page 287 of 349 Trip Generation Summary:Edmonds Westgate Rezone-Total Study Area REZONE SCENARIO Total Person Trips - Rezone Scenario PM Peak Hour Person Trip Summary Size Daily In Out Total Retail (LU 820) 336,800 sf 17,350 739 769 1,508 General Office (LU 710) 167,600 sf 2,030 47 228 275 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) 204 dwelling units 1,630 99 53 152 Total All Person Trips 21,010 885 1,050 1,935 Internal Trips 1,948 91 91 182 % Internal Trips 9.3% External Trips 19,062 794 959 1,753 External Person Trips by Mode - Rezone Scenario Percent PM Peak Hour Land Use/Mode Share Mode Share Daily In Out Total Retail (LU 820) Walk or Bicycle Trips 8.5%1,390 59 61 120 Transit Trips 7.5%1,220 52 54 106 Person Trips by Vehicle 84.1%13,786 585 608 1,193 Total 100.0%16,396 696 723 1,419 General Office (LU 710) Walk or Bicycle Trips 3.0%50 1 6 7 Transit Trips 1.7%30 1 3 4 Person Trips by Vehicle 95.3%1,555 30 202 232 Total 100.0%1,635 32 211 243 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) Walk, Bicycle, or Other Trips 8.5%90 6 2 8 Transit Trips 7.5%80 5 2 7 Person Trips by Vehicle 84.1%861 55 21 76 Total 100.0%1,031 66 25 91 Total Project Person Trips Walk, Bicycle or Other 1,530 66 69 135 Transit Trips 1,330 58 59 117 Person Trips by Vehicle 16,202 670 831 1,501 Total 19,062 794 959 1,753 Vehicle Trips by Component - Rezone Scenario Percent of PM Peak Hour Land Use/Trip Component Type Trips Daily In Out Total AVO Retail (LU 820)1.20 Primary Trips 66%7,580 319 337 656 Pass-by Trips 34%3,910 169 169 338 Total 100%11,490 488 506 994 General Office (LU 710) Primary Trips 100%1,460 28 189 217 1.07 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%1,460 28 189 217 Multifamily Residential (LU 220)1.07 Primary Trips 100%810 52 19 71 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%810 52 19 71 Total Project - Vehicle Trips Primary Trips 9,850 399 545 944 Pass-by Trips 3,910 169 169 338 Total Project Trips 13,760 568 714 1,282 9.4% Trip Generation Summary Page 1 8/21/2012 Packet Page 288 of 349 Trip Generation Summary:Edmonds Westgate Rezone-Total Study Area BASELINE SCENARIO Total Person Trips - Baseline Scenario PM Peak Hour Person Trip Summary Size Daily In Out Total Retail (LU 820) 201,175 sf 10,370 441 459 900 General Office (LU 710) 52,302 sf 630 15 71 86 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) 13 dwelling units 100 7 3 10 Single Family Residential (LU 210) 7 dwelling units 80 5 3 8 Church (LU 560) 0 sf 0 0 0 0 Total All Person Trips 11,180 468 536 1,004 Internal Trips 338 19 19 38 % Internal Trips 3.0% External Trips 10,857 449 517 966 External Person Trips by Mode - Baseline Scenario Percent PM Peak Hour Land Use/Mode Share Mode Share Daily In Out Total Retail (LU 820) Walk or Bicycle Trips 8.5%860 36 39 75 Transit Trips 7.5%760 32 34 66 Person Trips by Vehicle 84.1%8,598 362 379 741 Total 100.0%10,218 430 452 882 General Office (LU 710) Walk or Bicycle Trips 3.0%20 0 2 2 Transit Trips 1.7%10 0 1 1 Person Trips by Vehicle 95.3%482 10 59 69 Total 100.0%512 10 62 72 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) Walk, Bicycle, or Other Trips 8.5%10 0 1 1 Transit Trips 7.5%00 11 Person Trips by Vehicle 84.1%52 5 0 5 Total 100.0%62 5 2 7 Single Family Residential (LU 210) Walk or Bicycle Trips 8.5%10 0 0 0 Transit Trips 7.5%00 00 Person Trips by Vehicle 84.1%55 4 1 5 Total 100.0%65 4 1 5 Church (LU 560) Walk or Bicycle Trips 0.0%00 00 Transit Trips 0.0%00 00 Person Trips by Vehicle 100.0%0 0 0 0 Total 100.0%00 00 Total Project Person Trips Walk, Bicycle or Other 900 36 42 78 Transit Trips 770 32 36 68 Person Trips by Vehicle 9,187 381 439 820 Total 10,857 449 517 966 Vehicle Trips by Component - Baseline Scenario Percent of PM Peak Hour Land Use/Trip Component Type Trips Daily In Out Total AVO Retail (LU 820)1.20 Primary Trips 66%4,730 197 211 408 Pass-by Trips 34%2,440 105 105 210 Total 100%7,170 302 316 618 General Office (LU 710)1.07 Primary Trips 100%450 9 56 65 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%450 9 56 65 Multifamily Residential (LU 220) Primary Trips 100%50 5 0 5 1.07 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%50 5 0 5 Single Family Residential (LU 210) Primary Trips 100%50 4 1 5 1.07 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%50 4 1 5 Church (LU 560) Primary Trips 100%00 001.20 Pass-by Trips 0%0 0 0 0 Total 100%00 00 Total Project - Vehicle Trips Primary Trips 5,280 215 268 483 Pass-by Trips 2,440 105 105 210 Total Project Trips 7,720 320 373 693 3.8% Trip Generation Summary Page 2 8/21/2012 Packet Page 289 of 349 Trip Generation Summary:Edmonds Westgate Rezone-Total Study Area NET NEW TRIPS Net New Vehicle Trips PM Peak Hour Land Use Daily In Out Total Rezone Scenario Retail - Primary Trips 7,580 319 337 656 Office - Primary Trips 1,460 28 189 217 Residential - Primary Trips 810 52 19 71 Total Primary Trips 9,850 399 545 944 Total (Retail) Pass-By Trips 3,910 169 169 338 Total Rezone Scenario Vehicle Trips 13,760 568 714 1282 Baseline Scenario Retail - Primary Trips 4,730 197 211 408 Office - Primary Trips 450 9 56 65 Residential - Primary Trips 100 9 1 10 Total Primary Trips 5,280 215 268 483 Total (Retail) Pass-By Trips 2,440 105 105 210 Total 7,720 320 373 693 Net New Vehicle Trips Retail - Primary Trips 2,850 122 126 248 Office - Primary Trips 1,010 19 133 152 Residential - Primary Trips 710 43 18 61 Net New Primary Trips 4,570 184 277 461 Net New (Retail) Pass-By Trips 1,470 64 64 128 Total 6,040 248 341 589 Trip Generation Summary Page 3 8/21/2012 Packet Page 290 of 349 ATTACHMENT B LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS & REPORTS Packet Page 291 of 349 Levels of service (LOS) are qualitative descriptions of traffic operating conditions. These levels of service are designated with letters ranging from LOS A, which is indicative of good operating condi- tions with little or no delay, to LOS F, which is indicative of stop-and-go conditions with frequent and lengthy delays. Levels of service for this analysis were developed using procedures presented in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2010). Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay. Delay can be a cause of driver discomfort, frustration, inefficient fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Specifically, level of service criteria are stated in terms of the average delay per vehicle in seconds. Delay is a complex measure and is dependent on a number of variables including: the quality of progression, cycle length, green ratio, and a volume-to-capacity ratio for the lane group or approach in question. Table B-1 shows the level of service criteria for signalized intersections from the Highway Capacity Manual. Table B-1. Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Average Delay Per Vehicle General Description A Less than 10.0 Seconds Free flow B 10.1 to 20.0 seconds Stable flow (slight delays) C 20.1 to 35.0 seconds Stable flow (acceptable delays) D 35.1 to 55.0 seconds Approaching unstable flow (tolerable delay— occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding. E 55.1 to 80.0 seconds Unstable flow (approaching intolerable delay) F Greater than 80.0 seconds Forced flow (jammed) Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. For unsignalized intersections, level of service is based on the average delay per vehicle for each turning movement. The level of service for a two-way, stop-controlled intersection is determined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Delay is related to the availability of gaps in the main street's traffic flow, and the ability of a driver to enter or pass through those gaps. The delay at an all-way, stop-sign (AWSC) controlled intersection is based on saturation headways, departure headways, and service time using procedures in Chapter 17 – Unsignalized Intersections, Applications – AWSC Intersections of the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (Transportation Research Board (TRB), 2010). Table B-2 shows the level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections from the Highway Capacity Manual. Table B-2. Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Delay (seconds per vehicle) A Less than 10.0 B 10.1 to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 35.0 E 35.1 to 50.0 F Greater than 50.0 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. Packet Page 292 of 349 SYNCHRO/SIDRA REPORTS TRANSPORTATION PLAN ANALYSIS Packet Page 293 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 1: 174th St SW & Olympic View Dr.HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 30 30 90 640 880 40 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 33 33 98 696 957 43 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1870 978 1000 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 978 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 891 vCu, unblocked vol 1870 978 1000 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.4 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 87 89 86 cM capacity (veh/h) 252 304 692 Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 65 98 696 1000 Volume Left 33 98 0 0 Volume Right 33 0 0 43 cSH 276 692 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.14 0.41 0.59 Queue Length 95th (ft) 22 12 0 0 Control Delay (s)22.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C B Approach Delay (s) 22.1 1.4 0.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 Packet Page 294 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 2: Olympic View Dr. & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 30 340 10 220 340 60 10 210 390 70 50 30 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.91 0.97 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1849 1770 1821 1701 1771 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.68 Satd. Flow (perm) 1766 843 1821 1695 1231 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 33 370 11 239 370 65 11 228 424 76 54 33 RTOR Reduction (vph)0200110011100160 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 412 0 239 424 0 0 552 0 0 147 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s)18.6 18.6 18.6 19.4 19.4 Effective Green, g (s)19.6 19.6 19.6 20.4 20.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.44 0.44 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)752 359 776 752 546 v/s Ratio Prot 0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.28 c0.33 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.67 0.55 0.73 0.27 Uniform Delay, d1 9.9 10.6 9.9 10.6 8.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 4.6 0.8 3.7 0.3 Delay (s)10.7 15.2 10.7 14.3 8.4 Level of Service B B B B A Approach Delay (s)10.7 12.3 14.3 8.4 Approach LOS BBBA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.3 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 46.0 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 295 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 3: 196th St SW & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 130 680 50 310 890 210 160 340 210 170 140 80 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.96 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3503 1770 3438 3345 3357 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.98 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3503 1770 3438 3345 3357 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 141 739 54 337 967 228 174 370 228 185 152 87 RTOR Reduction (vph)060023005100260 Lane Group Flow (vph) 141 787 0 337 1172 0 0 721 0 0 398 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 7.6 21.1 17.7 31.2 18.0 14.7 Effective Green, g (s) 8.6 22.1 18.7 32.2 19.0 15.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.25 0.21 0.37 0.22 0.18 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 174 885 378 1265 726 602 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.22 c0.19 c0.34 c0.22 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.81 0.89 0.89 0.93 0.99 0.66 Uniform Delay, d1 38.7 31.5 33.4 26.5 34.2 33.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 24.0 10.8 22.2 11.6 31.5 2.7 Delay (s)62.7 42.4 55.6 38.1 65.7 36.1 Level of Service E D E D E D Approach Delay (s)45.4 42.0 65.7 36.1 Approach LOS D D E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 47.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.87 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 87.5 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 296 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 4: Puget Dr & 88th Ave W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 40 580 10 100 580 120 30 70 100 40 70 50 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.93 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1858 1770 1815 1724 1762 Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.94 0.91 Satd. Flow (perm) 421 1858 572 1815 1627 1631 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 630 11 109 630 130 33 76 109 43 76 54 RTOR Reduction (vph)010013006100280 Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 640 0 109 747 0 0 157 0 0 145 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 9.6 9.6 Effective Green, g (s) 22.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 10.6 10.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 244 1075 331 1050 438 439 v/s Ratio Prot 0.34 c0.41 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.19 c0.10 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.18 0.60 0.33 0.71 0.36 0.33 Uniform Delay, d1 3.9 5.3 4.3 5.9 11.6 11.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.9 0.6 2.3 0.5 0.4 Delay (s)4.2 6.2 4.9 8.2 12.1 12.0 Level of Service A A A A B B Approach Delay (s)6.1 7.8 12.1 12.0 Approach LOS AABB Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 8.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 39.4 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 297 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 5: Puget Dr & Olympic View Dr.HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 410 490 500 10 30 330 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1858 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 718 1863 1858 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 446 533 543 11 33 359 RTOR Reduction (vph)00100271 Lane Group Flow (vph) 446 533 553 0 33 88 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 55.0 55.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 Effective Green, g (s) 60.0 60.0 60.0 22.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.24 0.24 Clearance Time (s)9.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 479 1242 1239 433 387 v/s Ratio Prot 0.29 0.30 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm c0.62 c0.06 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.43 0.45 0.08 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 13.2 7.0 7.1 26.2 27.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 27.1 1.1 1.2 0.3 1.4 Delay (s)40.3 8.1 8.3 26.5 28.6 Level of Service D A A C C Approach Delay (s)22.8 8.3 28.4 Approach LOS C A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 19.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 298 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 6: Caspers St & 9th Ave N HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 420 30 270 550 10 580 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1770 1863 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 751 1863 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 457 33 293 598 11 630 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 0 224 Lane Group Flow (vph) 457 17 293 598 11 406 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 16.0 16.0 Effective Green, g (s) 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 17.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 970 824 391 970 627 561 v/s Ratio Prot 0.25 0.32 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.39 c0.26 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.02 0.75 0.62 0.02 0.72 Uniform Delay, d1 7.3 5.6 9.0 8.1 10.1 13.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 7.7 1.2 0.0 4.6 Delay (s) 7.7 5.6 16.7 9.3 10.1 18.1 Level of Service AABABB Approach Delay (s) 7.5 11.7 17.9 Approach LOS A B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 48.0 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 299 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 7: 208th St SW & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 5 5 380 0 250 5 660 500 90 320 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1750 1770 1583 1862 1583 3501 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 Satd. Flow (perm) 1750 1770 1583 1858 1583 2167 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 5 5 413 0 272 5 717 543 98 348 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0500182000186000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 10 0 413 90 0 0 722 357 0 446 0 Turn Type Split Split Perm Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 3 3 8 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s)1.3 28.2 28.2 43.8 43.8 43.8 Effective Green, g (s)1.3 29.2 28.2 44.8 44.8 44.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.34 0.33 0.53 0.53 0.53 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)27 606 523 976 831 1138 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.23 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.39 0.23 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.68 0.17 0.74 0.43 0.39 Uniform Delay, d1 41.6 24.1 20.3 15.7 12.4 12.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 8.5 3.2 0.2 3.0 0.4 0.2 Delay (s)50.1 27.2 20.4 18.7 12.8 12.3 Level of Service D C C B B B Approach Delay (s)50.1 24.5 16.2 12.3 Approach LOS D C B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 18.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 85.3 Sum of lost time (s)10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 300 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 8: 212th St SW & SR 99 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 230 380 90 160 410 140 150 1780 210 140 1620 180 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3437 1770 3404 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3437 1770 3404 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 250 413 98 174 446 152 163 1935 228 152 1761 196 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000000580055 Lane Group Flow (vph) 250 511 0 174 598 0 163 1935 170 152 1761 141 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 26 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.9 29.2 18.7 25.0 12.9 70.5 70.5 11.5 69.1 69.1 Effective Green, g (s) 24.4 30.7 20.2 26.5 13.4 73.0 73.0 12.0 71.6 71.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.21 0.14 0.18 0.09 0.49 0.49 0.08 0.48 0.48 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 5.5 5.5 3.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.5 3.5 2.0 3.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 292 713 242 610 160 1747 781 144 1713 766 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.15 0.10 c0.18 c0.09 c0.55 0.09 0.50 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.72 0.72 0.98 1.02 1.11 0.22 1.06 1.03 0.18 Uniform Delay, d1 60.0 54.6 61.1 60.4 67.2 37.5 21.2 68.0 38.2 21.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 20.4 2.9 8.2 31.3 76.2 57.4 0.2 90.6 29.2 0.1 Delay (s)80.4 57.4 69.4 91.7 143.4 94.8 21.4 158.5 67.4 21.7 Level of Service F E E F F F C F E C Approach Delay (s)65.0 86.7 91.0 69.7 Approach LOS E F F E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 79.6 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 147.9 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 301 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 9: 212th St SW & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 250 380 110 180 470 120 170 760 140 100 390 210 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3457 1770 3354 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3457 1770 3354 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 272 413 120 196 511 130 185 826 152 109 424 228 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 84 0 0 90 0 14 0 0 67 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 272 413 36 196 511 40 185 964 0 109 585 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 30.4 30.4 14.7 29.1 29.1 13.3 29.0 11.6 27.3 Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 31.4 31.4 15.7 30.1 30.1 14.3 30.0 12.6 28.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.30 0.30 0.15 0.28 0.28 0.14 0.28 0.12 0.27 Clearance Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 285 553 470 263 531 451 239 981 211 898 v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 0.22 0.11 c0.27 c0.10 c0.28 0.06 0.17 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.95 0.75 0.08 0.75 0.96 0.09 0.77 0.98 0.52 0.65 Uniform Delay, d1 44.0 33.6 26.7 43.1 37.2 27.7 44.1 37.6 43.7 34.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 40.7 5.5 0.1 10.9 29.5 0.1 14.4 24.5 2.1 1.7 Delay (s)84.7 39.0 26.8 54.0 66.8 27.8 58.6 62.1 45.8 36.0 Level of Service F D C D E C E E D D Approach Delay (s)52.6 57.7 61.5 37.4 Approach LOS D E E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 53.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.7 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 302 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 10: Main St & 84th Av. W HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR EBR2 WBL2 WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Right Turn Channelized Volume (veh/h) 90 220 230 110 10 170 230 20 20 150 120 110 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 98 239 250 120 11 185 250 22 22 163 130 120 Approach Volume (veh/h) 707 467 435 Crossing Volume (veh/h) 462 467 641 High Capacity (veh/h) 962 958 833 High v/c (veh/h) 0.73 0.49 0.52 Low Capacity (veh/h) 780 776 666 Low v/c (veh/h) 0.91 0.60 0.65 Intersection Summary Maximum v/c High 0.73 Maximum v/c Low 0.91 Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.5% ICU Level of Service H Movement SBL SBT SBR SBR2 NEL2 NEL NER NER2 Right Turn Channelized Volume (veh/h) 90 130 5 40 40 10 140 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 98 141 5 43 43 11 152 22 Approach Volume (veh/h) 288 228 Crossing Volume (veh/h) 674 837 High Capacity (veh/h) 812 711 High v/c (veh/h) 0.35 0.32 Low Capacity (veh/h) 647 559 Low v/c (veh/h) 0.45 0.41 Intersection Summary Packet Page 303 of 349 Unlicensed Trial Version INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: Rou 5-way Star 1-Lane R Roundabout with 5 legs, and 1-lane approaches and circulating road Roundabout Intersection Performance - Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)2125 veh/h 2655 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2.0 % Degree of Saturation 0.754 Practical Spare Capacity 12.7 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2819 veh/h Control Delay (Total)5.90 veh-h/h 7.08 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)10.0 sec 9.6 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)11.2 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)11.2 sec 11.2 sec Geometric Delay (Average)3.6 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)6.4 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS A 95% Back of Queue - Vehicles (Worst Lane)10.2 veh 95% Back of Queue - Distance (Worst Lane)72.7 m Total Effective Stops 1977 veh/h 2372 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.93 per veh 0.89 per pers Proportion Queued 0.86 0.83 Performance Index 53.9 53.9 Travel Distance (Total)1212.1 veh-km/h 1454.6 pers-km/h Travel Distance (Average)570 m 548 m Travel Time (Total)32.9 veh-h/h 39.4 pers-h/h Travel Time (Average)55.7 sec 53.5 sec Travel Speed 36.9 km/h 36.9 km/h Cost (Total)1083.85 $/h 1083.85 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)129.1 L/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)323.1 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.532 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)21.90 kg/h NOx (Total)0.644 kg/h Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (HCM 2000). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model used. Intersection Performance - Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)1,020,000 veh/y 1,274,400 pers/y Delay 2,832 veh-h/y 3,399 pers-h/y Effective Stops 948,848 veh/y 1,138,618 pers/y Travel Distance 581,832 veh-km/y 698,198 pers-km/y Travel Time 15,775 veh-h/y 18,930 pers-h/y Cost 520,249 $/y 520,249 $/y Fuel Consumption 61,983 L/y Carbon Dioxide 155,081 kg/y Hydrocarbons 255 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 10,512 kg/y NOx 309 kg/y Processed: Thursday, September 06, 2012 8:47:17 AM SIDRA INTERSECTION 5.1.12.2089 Copyright © 2000-2011 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www.sidrasolutions.com Packet Page 304 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 11: Main St & 9th Ave N HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 50 230 70 150 230 40 50 330 150 20 250 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 0.99 0.96 0.99 Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1800 1807 1783 1839 Flt Permitted 0.91 0.74 0.94 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1645 1354 1692 1755 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 54 250 76 163 250 43 54 359 163 22 272 22 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 00600240050 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 365 0 0 450 0 0 552 0 0 311 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s)21.2 21.2 21.0 21.0 Effective Green, g (s)21.2 21.2 21.0 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)695 572 708 734 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 c0.33 c0.33 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.79 0.78 0.42 Uniform Delay, d1 10.8 12.5 12.6 10.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 7.0 5.4 0.4 Delay (s)11.5 19.6 18.0 10.7 Level of Service BBBB Approach Delay (s)11.5 19.6 18.0 10.7 Approach LOS BBBB Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 15.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 50.2 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 305 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 12: Walnut St & 9th Ave N HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 20 60 20 90 70 70 30 620 70 50 490 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 0.96 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1794 1752 1834 1850 Flt Permitted 0.93 0.86 0.97 0.90 Satd. Flow (perm) 1692 1542 1780 1679 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 22 65 22 98 76 76 33 674 76 54 533 11 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 27 0070010 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 94 0 0 223 0 0 776 0 0 597 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s)11.7 11.7 28.1 28.1 Effective Green, g (s)12.7 12.7 29.1 29.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.61 0.61 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)450 410 1084 1022 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.14 c0.44 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.54 0.72 0.58 Uniform Delay, d1 13.6 15.1 6.5 5.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 1.5 2.3 0.9 Delay (s)13.9 16.5 8.8 6.5 Level of Service BBAA Approach Delay (s)13.9 16.5 8.8 6.5 Approach LOS BBAA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.4 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 47.8 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 306 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 13: Main St & 3rd Ave N HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 150 110 20 50 180 30 70 180 40 60 310 70 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.98 Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1634 1807 1810 Flt Permitted 0.70 0.92 0.84 0.93 Satd. Flow (perm) 1299 1511 1529 1687 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 163 120 22 54 196 33 76 196 43 65 337 76 RTOR Reduction (vph)000000000000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 305 0 0 283 0 0 315 0 0 478 0 Parking (#/hr) 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 8426 Permitted Phases 8426 Actuated Green, G (s)10.0 10.0 16.4 16.4 Effective Green, g (s)11.0 11.0 17.4 17.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.32 0.51 0.51 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)415 483 773 853 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm c0.23 0.19 0.21 c0.28 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.59 0.41 0.56 Uniform Delay, d1 10.4 9.8 5.3 5.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.6 1.2 0.1 0.5 Delay (s)17.0 11.0 5.4 6.4 Level of Service BBAA Approach Delay (s)17.0 11.0 5.4 6.4 Approach LOS BBAA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.4 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 34.4 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 307 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 14: 220th St SW & SR 99 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 120 330 50 140 600 270 140 1680 250 500 1660 170 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3470 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3470 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 130 359 54 152 652 293 152 1826 272 543 1804 185 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000000600064 Lane Group Flow (vph) 130 413 0 152 652 293 152 1826 212 543 1804 121 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.0 17.7 10.3 20.0 20.0 10.3 57.9 57.9 17.1 64.7 64.7 Effective Green, g (s) 9.0 18.7 11.3 21.0 21.0 11.3 59.9 59.9 18.1 66.7 66.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.16 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.15 0.56 0.56 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 133 541 167 619 277 167 1767 790 518 1967 880 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.12 0.09 0.18 0.09 c0.52 c0.16 0.51 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.13 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.76 0.91 1.05 1.06 0.91 1.03 0.27 1.05 0.92 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 55.4 48.5 53.8 49.5 49.5 53.8 30.1 17.4 51.0 24.1 12.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 70.4 6.3 44.5 51.0 70.1 44.5 30.5 0.2 52.8 7.3 0.1 Delay (s)125.8 54.9 98.3 100.5 119.6 98.3 60.6 17.6 103.7 31.4 12.9 Level of Service F D FFFFEBFCB Approach Delay (s)71.8 105.3 57.9 45.6 Approach LOS E F E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 62.3 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 308 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 15: 220th St SW & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 13 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 150 290 50 80 430 510 30 420 40 220 480 120 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1822 1848 1583 1770 1839 1770 1807 Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 195 1822 1634 1583 1770 1839 1770 1807 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 163 315 54 87 467 554 33 457 43 239 522 130 RTOR Reduction (vph)0000098030000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 369 0 0 554 457 33 497 0 239 652 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 57.3 57.3 41.0 41.0 3.5 34.7 16.0 47.2 Effective Green, g (s) 58.3 58.3 42.0 42.0 4.5 35.7 17.0 48.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.35 0.35 0.04 0.30 0.14 0.40 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 269 885 572 554 66 547 251 726 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.20 0.02 0.27 c0.14 c0.36 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.34 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.42 0.97 0.82 0.50 0.91 0.95 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 23.7 19.9 38.4 35.6 56.6 40.6 51.1 33.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.8 0.3 29.4 9.7 5.8 18.9 43.5 13.8 Delay (s)27.5 20.2 67.8 45.3 62.5 59.5 94.6 47.4 Level of Service C C E D E E F D Approach Delay (s)22.4 56.5 59.7 60.1 Approach LOS C E E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 52.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 309 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 16: 220th St SW & 84th Av. W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 14 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 60 240 10 50 420 120 60 340 50 130 130 60 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1851 1770 1801 1770 1827 1779 Flt Permitted 0.26 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.64 Satd. Flow (perm) 481 1851 1051 1801 1055 1827 1154 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 65 261 11 54 457 130 65 370 54 141 141 65 RTOR Reduction (vph)000000000000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 65 272 0 54 587 0 65 424 0 0 347 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 13.9 13.9 13.9 Effective Green, g (s) 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 14.9 14.9 14.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.41 0.41 0.41 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 205 788 448 767 432 748 472 v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.33 0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.05 0.06 c0.30 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.35 0.12 0.77 0.15 0.57 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 6.9 7.0 6.3 8.9 6.8 8.3 9.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.3 0.1 4.6 0.2 1.0 5.9 Delay (s)7.8 7.3 6.4 13.5 6.9 9.3 15.0 Level of Service A A A B A A B Approach Delay (s)7.4 12.9 8.9 15.0 Approach LOS ABAB Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.2 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 36.4 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 310 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 17: Elm Wy & 9th Ave S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 15 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 10 30 5 90 40 160 5 650 140 100 420 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1656 1425 1620 1425 1676 1425 1593 1671 Flt Permitted 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1656 1425 1620 1425 1672 1425 383 1671 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 33 5 98 43 174 5 707 152 109 457 11 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000138000000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 44 5 0 141 36 0 712 152 109 468 0 Turn Type Split Prot Split Prot Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 444888 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s)4.2 4.2 11.7 11.7 35.8 35.8 35.8 35.8 Effective Green, g (s)6.2 6.2 13.7 13.7 37.8 37.8 37.8 37.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.21 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 Clearance Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)154 132 333 293 948 808 217 947 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.00 c0.09 0.03 0.28 v/s Ratio Perm c0.43 0.11 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.04 0.42 0.12 0.75 0.19 0.50 0.49 Uniform Delay, d1 28.2 27.5 23.1 21.6 10.9 7.0 8.8 8.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.1 0.9 0.2 3.4 0.1 1.8 0.4 Delay (s)29.2 27.7 23.9 21.8 14.3 7.1 10.6 9.1 Level of Service C C C C BABA Approach Delay (s)29.1 22.7 13.0 9.4 Approach LOS C C B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 14.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 66.7 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 311 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 18: Edmonds Wy & 100th Ave W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 16 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 50 730 190 180 760 270 280 540 150 230 350 30 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3429 1770 3400 1770 3424 1770 3497 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3429 1770 3400 1770 3424 1770 3497 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 54 793 207 196 826 293 304 587 163 250 380 33 RTOR Reduction (vph)000000000000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 54 1000 0 196 1119 0 304 750 0 250 413 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 3.9 28.1 14.6 38.8 16.0 22.3 14.0 20.3 Effective Green, g (s) 4.9 30.6 15.6 41.3 17.0 24.8 15.0 22.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.31 0.16 0.42 0.17 0.25 0.15 0.23 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)89 1071 282 1433 307 866 271 814 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.29 c0.11 0.33 c0.17 c0.22 0.14 0.12 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.61 0.93 0.70 0.78 0.99 0.87 0.92 0.51 Uniform Delay, d1 45.6 32.7 39.0 24.4 40.4 35.0 40.9 32.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 11.2 14.2 7.2 2.8 48.6 9.1 34.6 0.5 Delay (s)56.8 46.9 46.2 27.3 89.0 44.1 75.5 33.2 Level of Service E D D C F D E C Approach Delay (s)47.4 30.1 57.0 49.2 Approach LOS D C E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 44.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 98.0 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 312 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 19: 238th St SW & SR 99 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 17 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 200 50 150 30 50 20 290 1610 40 60 1420 140 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1791 1583 1785 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.67 1.00 0.81 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1252 1583 1476 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 217 54 163 33 54 22 315 1750 43 65 1543 152 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 122 0 10 0 0 0 18 0 0 81 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 271 41 0 99 0 315 1750 25 65 1543 71 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s)22.4 22.4 22.4 17.4 50.0 50.0 5.1 37.7 37.7 Effective Green, g (s)22.9 22.9 22.9 17.9 52.5 52.5 5.6 40.2 40.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.20 0.58 0.58 0.06 0.45 0.45 Clearance Time (s)3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 5.5 5.5 3.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)319 403 376 352 2064 923 110 1581 707 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.49 0.04 c0.44 v/s Ratio Perm c0.22 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.10 0.26 0.89 0.85 0.03 0.59 0.98 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 31.9 25.7 26.8 35.1 15.5 7.9 41.1 24.4 14.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 18.6 0.1 0.4 23.8 4.6 0.1 8.2 17.6 0.3 Delay (s)50.5 25.8 27.2 59.0 20.0 8.0 49.3 42.0 14.7 Level of Service D C C E C A D D B Approach Delay (s)41.2 27.2 25.6 39.9 Approach LOS DCCD Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 32.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 313 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 20: 238th St SW & Edmonds Wy HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 18 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 5 10 20 5 230 20 1340 70 90 960 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1790 1583 1770 3513 1770 3534 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.82 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1649 1536 1583 1770 3513 1770 3534 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 5 11 22 5 250 22 1457 76 98 1043 11 RTOR Reduction (vph)09000124050010 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 12 0 0 27 126 22 1528 0 98 1053 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s)9.4 9.4 9.4 0.7 31.6 3.1 34.0 Effective Green, g (s)10.4 10.4 10.4 1.7 32.6 4.1 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.58 0.07 0.62 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)306 285 293 54 2041 129 2205 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.43 c0.06 0.30 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.02 c0.08 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.09 0.43 0.41 0.75 0.76 0.48 Uniform Delay, d1 18.8 18.9 20.2 26.7 8.7 25.5 5.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 1.0 4.9 1.5 22.3 0.2 Delay (s)18.8 19.1 21.2 31.7 10.3 47.8 5.8 Level of Service B B C C B D A Approach Delay (s)18.8 21.0 10.6 9.4 Approach LOS B C B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.1 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 56.1 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 314 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 21: 244th St SW & 76th Ave W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 19 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 40 1690 80 370 1770 160 190 230 380 100 160 30 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3515 3433 3495 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3515 3433 3495 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 1837 87 402 1924 174 207 250 413 109 174 33 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000000560029 Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 1924 0 402 2098 0 207 250 357 109 174 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 52316 Permitted Phases 26 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.6 80.9 17.0 94.3 17.0 25.0 42.0 9.2 17.2 17.2 Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 82.9 18.0 96.3 18.0 26.0 44.0 10.2 18.2 18.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.56 0.12 0.65 0.12 0.17 0.30 0.07 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)55 1954 414 2257 214 325 499 121 227 193 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.55 c0.12 0.60 c0.12 c0.13 c0.09 0.06 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.78 0.98 0.97 0.93 0.97 0.77 0.71 0.90 0.77 0.02 Uniform Delay, d1 71.8 32.5 65.3 23.4 65.3 58.7 46.9 68.9 63.4 57.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 50.5 16.7 36.5 7.4 51.6 10.5 4.8 52.3 14.3 0.0 Delay (s)122.2 49.2 101.8 30.8 116.9 69.2 51.8 121.2 77.7 57.7 Level of Service F D F C F E D F E E Approach Delay (s)50.8 42.2 72.3 90.6 Approach LOS D D E F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 52.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 149.1 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 315 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 22: 244th St SW & SR 99 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 280 230 130 340 440 320 120 1370 130 80 870 140 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3348 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3348 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 304 250 141 370 478 348 130 1489 141 87 946 152 RTOR Reduction (vph)0000010000710049 Lane Group Flow (vph) 304 391 0 370 478 248 130 1489 70 87 946 103 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.2 15.1 20.0 17.9 17.9 9.4 42.3 42.3 4.7 37.6 37.6 Effective Green, g (s) 18.2 17.1 21.0 19.9 19.9 10.4 42.3 43.3 5.7 37.6 38.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.17 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.43 0.44 0.06 0.38 0.39 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 325 578 375 711 318 186 1511 692 102 1343 617 v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 0.12 c0.21 0.14 c0.07 c0.42 c0.05 0.27 v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.04 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.68 0.99 0.67 0.78 0.70 0.99 0.10 0.85 0.70 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 39.9 38.4 38.9 36.6 37.5 42.8 28.1 16.4 46.3 26.0 19.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 33.2 3.1 42.5 2.5 11.7 10.9 19.6 0.1 45.9 1.7 0.1 Delay (s)73.1 41.5 81.4 39.1 49.2 53.7 47.7 16.5 92.2 27.7 19.9 Level of Service E D F DDDDBFCB Approach Delay (s)55.3 55.1 45.6 31.5 Approach LOS E E D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 45.9 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 99.1 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 316 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 23: 238th St. SW & 100th Av. W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 21 Movement EBL EBR EBR2 NBL NBT SBT SBR SBR2 NEL NER Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 80 10 110 130 840 220 270 150 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 3539 3191 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 3539 3191 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 11 120 141 913 239 293 163 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 72 0 0 0 43 0000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 59 0 141 913 652 0000 Turn Type Perm Prot Protected Phases 4 1 6 2 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.3 26.3 6.1 25.3 20.0 Effective Green, g (s) 26.3 26.3 6.1 26.3 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.40 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 712 637 165 1423 1025 v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 c0.08 c0.26 0.20 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.12 0.09 0.85 0.64 0.90dr Uniform Delay, d1 12.3 12.1 29.2 15.8 18.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.13 0.73 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 27.6 0.8 1.3 Delay (s)12.4 12.2 60.5 12.2 20.2 Level of Service B B E B C Approach Delay (s) 12.3 18.7 20.2 0.0 Approach LOS B B C A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 18.5 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.4 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 317 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 PM with Intersection Improvement 24: 238th St. SW & Firdale Av.HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report KK Page 22 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 410 30 30 20 20 20 30 540 20 10 230 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.96 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1769 1750 1770 3520 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.71 0.84 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1306 1487 1770 3520 1770 3539 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 446 33 33 22 22 22 33 587 22 11 250 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0400130040000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 508 0 0 53 0 33 605 0 11 250 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s)26.3 26.3 6.1 25.3 0.8 20.0 Effective Green, g (s)26.3 26.3 6.1 26.3 0.8 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.40 0.01 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)525 598 165 1416 22 1136 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.17 0.01 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm c0.39 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.09 0.20 0.43 0.50 0.22 Uniform Delay, d1 19.1 12.1 27.4 14.1 32.1 16.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.27 0.78 Incremental Delay, d2 30.7 0.1 0.6 0.2 13.1 0.1 Delay (s)49.9 12.2 28.0 14.3 53.8 12.7 Level of Service D B C B D B Approach Delay (s)49.9 12.2 15.0 14.4 Approach LOS D B B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 26.8 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.4 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 318 of 349 SYNCHRO/SIDRA REPORTS ANALYSIS WITH PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGE Packet Page 319 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 1: 174th St SW & Olympic View Dr.HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 30 30 90 641 881 40 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 33 33 98 697 958 43 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 1872 979 1001 vC1, stage 1 conf vol 979 vC2, stage 2 conf vol 892 vCu, unblocked vol 1872 979 1001 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) 5.4 tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 87 89 86 cM capacity (veh/h) 252 303 692 Direction, Lane # EB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total 65 98 697 1001 Volume Left 33 98 0 0 Volume Right 33 0 0 43 cSH 275 692 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.24 0.14 0.41 0.59 Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 12 0 0 Control Delay (s)22.1 11.1 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C B Approach Delay (s) 22.1 1.4 0.0 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 Packet Page 320 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 2: Olympic View Dr. & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 30 340 10 221 340 60 10 213 391 70 50 30 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.91 0.97 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1849 1770 1821 1701 1771 Flt Permitted 0.95 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.68 Satd. Flow (perm) 1766 841 1821 1696 1227 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 33 370 11 240 370 65 11 232 425 76 54 33 RTOR Reduction (vph)0200110010900160 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 412 0 240 424 0 0 559 0 0 147 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s)18.7 18.7 18.7 19.6 19.6 Effective Green, g (s)19.7 19.7 19.7 20.6 20.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.44 0.44 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)751 358 775 755 546 v/s Ratio Prot 0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.29 c0.33 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.55 0.67 0.55 0.74 0.27 Uniform Delay, d1 10.0 10.7 10.0 10.6 8.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 4.9 0.8 3.8 0.3 Delay (s)10.8 15.6 10.8 14.5 8.4 Level of Service B B B B A Approach Delay (s)10.8 12.5 14.5 8.4 Approach LOS BBBA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 12.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 46.3 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 321 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 3: 196th St SW & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 134 680 50 315 890 210 160 340 212 170 141 80 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 0.96 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3503 1770 3438 3344 3357 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.98 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3503 1770 3438 3344 3357 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 146 739 54 342 967 228 174 370 230 185 153 87 RTOR Reduction (vph)060022005200260 Lane Group Flow (vph) 146 787 0 342 1173 0 0 722 0 0 399 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 8.0 21.2 17.8 31.0 18.0 14.8 Effective Green, g (s) 9.0 22.2 18.8 32.0 19.0 15.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.25 0.21 0.36 0.22 0.18 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 181 886 379 1253 724 604 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 0.22 c0.19 c0.34 c0.22 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.81 0.89 0.90 0.94 1.00 0.66 Uniform Delay, d1 38.5 31.6 33.6 26.9 34.4 33.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 22.4 10.8 23.9 12.9 32.6 2.7 Delay (s)61.0 42.4 57.5 39.8 67.0 36.2 Level of Service E D E D E D Approach Delay (s)45.3 43.7 67.0 36.2 Approach LOS D D E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 48.1 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 87.8 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 322 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 4: Puget Dr & 88th Ave W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 41 582 11 100 580 120 32 72 100 40 72 50 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.93 0.96 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1858 1770 1815 1726 1763 Flt Permitted 0.23 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.93 0.91 Satd. Flow (perm) 420 1858 566 1815 1623 1632 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 45 633 12 109 630 130 35 78 109 43 78 54 RTOR Reduction (vph)010013005900270 Lane Group Flow (vph) 45 644 0 109 747 0 0 163 0 0 148 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s) 21.9 21.9 21.9 21.9 9.7 9.7 Effective Green, g (s) 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 10.7 10.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 243 1074 327 1050 439 441 v/s Ratio Prot 0.35 c0.41 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.19 c0.10 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.60 0.33 0.71 0.37 0.34 Uniform Delay, d1 3.9 5.4 4.4 6.0 11.7 11.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.9 0.6 2.3 0.5 0.5 Delay (s)4.3 6.3 5.0 8.3 12.3 12.1 Level of Service A A A A B B Approach Delay (s)6.2 7.9 12.3 12.1 Approach LOS AABB Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 8.1 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 39.6 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 323 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 5: Puget Dr & Olympic View Dr.HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 411 496 500 12 32 330 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1857 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.38 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 716 1863 1857 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 447 539 543 13 35 359 RTOR Reduction (vph)00100271 Lane Group Flow (vph) 447 539 555 0 35 88 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 55.0 55.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 Effective Green, g (s) 60.0 60.0 60.0 22.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.24 0.24 Clearance Time (s)9.0 9.0 9.0 6.0 6.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 477 1242 1238 433 387 v/s Ratio Prot 0.29 0.30 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm c0.62 c0.06 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.43 0.45 0.08 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 13.3 7.0 7.1 26.2 27.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 28.2 1.1 1.2 0.4 1.4 Delay (s)41.5 8.1 8.3 26.6 28.6 Level of Service D A A C C Approach Delay (s)23.3 8.3 28.4 Approach LOS C A C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 20.0 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 324 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 6: Caspers St & 9th Ave N HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 420 30 276 550 12 593 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 1770 1863 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 749 1863 1770 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 457 33 300 598 13 645 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 0 223 Lane Group Flow (vph) 457 17 300 598 13 422 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 16.5 16.5 Effective Green, g (s) 25.6 25.6 25.6 25.6 17.5 17.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.36 0.36 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 971 825 391 971 631 564 v/s Ratio Prot 0.25 0.32 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.40 c0.27 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.02 0.77 0.62 0.02 0.75 Uniform Delay, d1 7.5 5.7 9.4 8.3 10.2 13.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 8.7 1.2 0.0 5.4 Delay (s) 7.8 5.7 18.1 9.5 10.3 19.2 Level of Service AABABB Approach Delay (s) 7.7 12.3 19.1 Approach LOS A B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 13.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 49.1 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 325 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 7: 208th St SW & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 5 5 380 0 250 5 664 500 90 326 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1750 1770 1583 1862 1583 3501 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.61 Satd. Flow (perm) 1750 1770 1583 1858 1583 2168 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 5 5 413 0 272 5 722 543 98 354 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0500183000183000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 10 0 413 89 0 0 727 360 0 452 0 Turn Type Split Split Perm Perm pm+pt Protected Phases 3 3 8 8 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 6 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s)1.3 28.2 28.2 44.7 44.7 44.7 Effective Green, g (s)1.3 29.2 28.2 45.7 45.7 45.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.34 0.33 0.53 0.53 0.53 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)26 600 518 985 839 1149 v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.23 0.06 v/s Ratio Perm c0.39 0.23 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.69 0.17 0.74 0.43 0.39 Uniform Delay, d1 42.1 24.6 20.7 15.6 12.3 12.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.3 3.3 0.2 2.9 0.4 0.2 Delay (s)51.4 27.9 20.8 18.6 12.7 12.2 Level of Service D C C B B B Approach Delay (s)51.4 25.1 16.0 12.2 Approach LOS D C B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 18.1 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 86.2 Sum of lost time (s)10.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 326 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 8: 212th St SW & SR 99 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 232 380 90 160 405 140 152 1780 210 140 1629 192 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3437 1770 3403 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3437 1770 3403 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 252 413 98 174 440 152 165 1935 228 152 1771 209 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000000580058 Lane Group Flow (vph) 252 511 0 174 592 0 165 1935 170 152 1771 151 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 26 Actuated Green, G (s) 22.9 29.3 18.7 25.1 12.9 70.5 70.5 11.5 69.1 69.1 Effective Green, g (s) 24.4 30.8 20.2 26.6 13.4 73.0 73.0 12.0 71.6 71.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.21 0.14 0.18 0.09 0.49 0.49 0.08 0.48 0.48 Clearance Time (s)4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 5.5 5.5 3.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.5 3.5 2.0 3.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 292 715 242 612 160 1746 781 144 1712 766 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.15 0.10 c0.17 c0.09 c0.55 0.09 0.50 v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.86 0.71 0.72 0.97 1.03 1.11 0.22 1.06 1.03 0.20 Uniform Delay, d1 60.2 54.5 61.2 60.3 67.3 37.5 21.3 68.0 38.2 21.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.5 2.8 8.2 27.9 79.6 57.6 0.2 90.6 31.2 0.1 Delay (s)81.7 57.4 69.4 88.2 146.9 95.1 21.5 158.6 69.4 21.9 Level of Service F E E F F F C F E C Approach Delay (s)65.4 83.9 91.6 71.1 Approach LOS E F F E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 80.0 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 148.0 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 327 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 9: 212th St SW & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 254 387 112 180 480 120 169 760 140 100 390 216 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3457 1770 3350 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3457 1770 3350 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 276 421 122 196 522 130 184 826 152 109 424 235 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 86 0 0 88 0 14 0 0 71 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 276 421 36 196 522 42 184 964 0 109 588 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 30.4 30.4 14.7 29.1 29.1 13.3 29.0 11.6 27.3 Effective Green, g (s) 17.0 31.4 31.4 15.7 30.1 30.1 14.3 30.0 12.6 28.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.30 0.30 0.15 0.28 0.28 0.14 0.28 0.12 0.27 Clearance Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 285 553 470 263 531 451 239 981 211 897 v/s Ratio Prot c0.16 0.23 0.11 c0.28 c0.10 c0.28 0.06 0.18 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.76 0.08 0.75 0.98 0.09 0.77 0.98 0.52 0.66 Uniform Delay, d1 44.1 33.7 26.7 43.1 37.5 27.8 44.1 37.6 43.7 34.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 44.1 6.1 0.1 10.9 34.5 0.1 13.9 24.5 2.1 1.7 Delay (s)88.2 39.9 26.8 54.0 72.0 27.9 58.0 62.1 45.8 36.1 Level of Service F D C D E C E E D D Approach Delay (s)54.2 61.1 61.4 37.5 Approach LOS D E E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 54.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 105.7 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 328 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 10: Main St & 84th Av. W HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR EBR2 WBL2 WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBT NBR Right Turn Channelized Volume (veh/h) 90 220 230 110 10 170 230 20 20 150 120 110 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 98 239 250 120 11 185 250 22 22 163 130 120 Approach Volume (veh/h) 707 467 435 Crossing Volume (veh/h) 462 467 641 High Capacity (veh/h) 962 958 833 High v/c (veh/h) 0.73 0.49 0.52 Low Capacity (veh/h) 780 776 666 Low v/c (veh/h) 0.91 0.60 0.65 Intersection Summary Maximum v/c High 0.73 Maximum v/c Low 0.91 Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.5% ICU Level of Service H Movement SBL SBT SBR SBR2 NEL2 NEL NER NER2 Right Turn Channelized Volume (veh/h) 90 130 5 40 40 10 140 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 98 141 5 43 43 11 152 22 Approach Volume (veh/h) 288 228 Crossing Volume (veh/h) 674 837 High Capacity (veh/h) 812 711 High v/c (veh/h) 0.35 0.32 Low Capacity (veh/h) 647 559 Low v/c (veh/h) 0.45 0.41 Intersection Summary Packet Page 329 of 349 Unlicensed Trial Version INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: Rou 5-way Star 1-Lane R Roundabout with 5 legs, and 1-lane approaches and circulating road Roundabout Intersection Performance - Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)2191 veh/h 2735 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles 2.0 % Degree of Saturation 0.780 Practical Spare Capacity 8.9 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2809 veh/h Control Delay (Total)6.70 veh-h/h 8.04 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)11.0 sec 10.6 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)12.8 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)12.8 sec 12.8 sec Geometric Delay (Average)P sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)P sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS B 95% Back of Queue - Vehicles (Worst Lane)11.3 veh 95% Back of Queue - Distance (Worst Lane)80.8 m Total Effective Stops 2159 veh/h 2591 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.99 per veh 0.95 per pers Proportion Queued 0.89 0.86 Performance Index 57.8 57.8 Travel Distance (Total)1250.6 veh-km/h 1500.8 pers-km/h Travel Distance (Average)571 m 549 m Travel Time (Total)34.5 veh-h/h 41.4 pers-h/h Travel Time (Average)56.6 sec 54.5 sec Travel Speed 36.3 km/h 36.3 km/h Cost (Total)1136.02 $/h 1136.02 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)134.7 L/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)337.0 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.558 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)22.95 kg/h NOx (Total)0.672 kg/h P: You need to Process this Site (F9) for this variable to be computed. Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (HCM 2000). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard. SIDRA Standard Delay Model used. Intersection Performance - Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)1,051,826 veh/y 1,312,591 pers/y Delay 3,216 veh-h/y 3,859 pers-h/y Effective Stops 1,036,348 veh/y 1,243,617 pers/y Travel Distance 600,307 veh-km/y 720,368 pers-km/y Travel Time 16,548 veh-h/y 19,857 pers-h/y Cost 545,289 $/y 545,289 $/y Fuel Consumption 64,661 L/y Carbon Dioxide 161,782 kg/y Hydrocarbons 268 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 11,016 kg/y NOx 323 kg/y Packet Page 330 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 11: Main St & 9th Ave N HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 50 233 70 151 233 40 50 356 157 20 263 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 0.99 0.96 0.99 Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1800 1807 1785 1840 Flt Permitted 0.91 0.73 0.95 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1647 1341 1696 1755 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 54 253 76 164 253 43 54 387 171 22 286 22 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 00600240050 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 368 0 0 454 0 0 588 0 0 325 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s)21.7 21.7 22.0 22.0 Effective Green, g (s)21.7 21.7 22.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.43 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)691 563 722 747 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 c0.34 c0.35 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.53 0.81 0.82 0.44 Uniform Delay, d1 11.2 13.2 13.1 10.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 8.2 7.0 0.4 Delay (s)12.0 21.4 20.1 10.9 Level of Service B C C B Approach Delay (s)12.0 21.4 20.1 10.9 Approach LOS B C C B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 17.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 51.7 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 331 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 12: Walnut St & 9th Ave N HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 20 65 20 95 72 70 30 653 81 50 504 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.97 0.96 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1753 1832 1850 Flt Permitted 0.94 0.87 0.97 0.90 Satd. Flow (perm) 1701 1547 1779 1672 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 22 71 22 103 78 76 33 710 88 54 548 11 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 26 0070010 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 100 0 0 231 0 0 824 0 0 612 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s)12.1 12.1 29.5 29.5 Effective Green, g (s)13.1 13.1 30.5 30.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.61 0.61 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)449 409 1094 1028 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.15 c0.46 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.57 0.75 0.60 Uniform Delay, d1 14.3 15.8 6.8 5.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 1.8 3.0 0.9 Delay (s)14.5 17.6 9.8 6.7 Level of Service BBAA Approach Delay (s)14.5 17.6 9.8 6.7 Approach LOS BBAA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 10.2 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 49.6 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 332 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 13: Main St & 3rd Ave N HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 150 112 20 50 180 30 70 193 40 60 316 70 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.98 Flt Protected 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1634 1809 1811 Flt Permitted 0.71 0.92 0.84 0.92 Satd. Flow (perm) 1302 1511 1538 1686 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 163 122 22 54 196 33 76 210 43 65 343 76 RTOR Reduction (vph)000000000000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 307 0 0 283 0 0 329 0 0 484 0 Parking (#/hr) 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 8426 Permitted Phases 8426 Actuated Green, G (s)10.1 10.1 16.5 16.5 Effective Green, g (s)11.1 11.1 17.5 17.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.32 0.51 0.51 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)418 485 778 853 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm c0.24 0.19 0.21 c0.29 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.58 0.42 0.57 Uniform Delay, d1 10.4 9.8 5.4 5.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.6 1.2 0.1 0.5 Delay (s)17.0 11.0 5.5 6.4 Level of Service BBAA Approach Delay (s)17.0 11.0 5.5 6.4 Approach LOS BBAA Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 9.5 HCM Level of Service A HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 34.6 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 333 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 14: 220th St SW & SR 99 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 12 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 141 330 53 140 595 270 143 1682 250 500 1660 179 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3465 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3465 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 153 359 58 152 647 293 155 1828 272 543 1804 195 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000000600068 Lane Group Flow (vph) 153 417 0 152 647 293 155 1828 212 543 1804 127 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.0 17.7 10.3 20.0 20.0 10.3 57.9 57.9 17.1 64.7 64.7 Effective Green, g (s) 9.0 18.7 11.3 21.0 21.0 11.3 59.9 59.9 18.1 66.7 66.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.16 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.15 0.56 0.56 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 133 540 167 619 277 167 1767 790 518 1967 880 v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.12 0.09 0.18 0.09 c0.52 c0.16 0.51 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.13 0.08 v/c Ratio 1.15 0.77 0.91 1.05 1.06 0.93 1.03 0.27 1.05 0.92 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 55.5 48.6 53.8 49.5 49.5 53.9 30.1 17.4 51.0 24.1 12.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 124.1 6.8 44.5 48.5 70.1 48.5 30.9 0.2 52.8 7.3 0.1 Delay (s)179.6 55.4 98.3 98.0 119.6 102.5 60.9 17.6 103.7 31.4 12.9 Level of Service F E FFFFEBFCB Approach Delay (s)88.7 103.9 58.6 45.4 Approach LOS F F E D Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 63.7 HCM Level of Service E HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 334 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 15: 220th St SW & 76th Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 13 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 150 312 50 80 438 509 30 420 40 222 480 120 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1824 1848 1583 1770 1839 1770 1807 Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 178 1824 1628 1583 1770 1839 1770 1807 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 163 339 54 87 476 553 33 457 43 241 522 130 RTOR Reduction (vph)0000098030000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 393 0 0 563 456 33 497 0 241 652 0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 1 6 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 57.3 57.3 41.0 41.0 3.5 34.7 16.0 47.2 Effective Green, g (s) 58.3 58.3 42.0 42.0 4.5 35.7 17.0 48.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.49 0.35 0.35 0.04 0.30 0.14 0.40 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 263 886 570 554 66 547 251 726 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.22 0.02 0.27 c0.14 c0.36 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 c0.35 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.44 0.99 0.82 0.50 0.91 0.96 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 24.0 20.2 38.7 35.6 56.6 40.6 51.2 33.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 0.4 34.2 9.6 5.8 18.9 45.6 13.8 Delay (s)28.3 20.6 72.9 45.1 62.5 59.5 96.8 47.4 Level of Service C C E D E E F D Approach Delay (s)22.8 59.2 59.7 60.8 Approach LOS C E E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 53.2 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 335 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 16: 220th St SW & 84th Av. W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 14 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 66 269 10 50 431 121 60 341 50 132 131 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1853 1770 1801 1770 1827 1777 Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.53 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.63 Satd. Flow (perm) 475 1853 985 1801 1041 1827 1147 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 72 292 11 54 468 132 65 371 54 143 142 71 RTOR Reduction (vph)000000000000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 72 303 0 54 600 0 65 425 0 0 356 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4826 Permitted Phases 4826 Actuated Green, G (s) 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 14.1 14.1 14.1 Effective Green, g (s) 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.1 15.1 15.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.41 0.41 0.41 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 203 791 420 768 427 750 471 v/s Ratio Prot 0.16 c0.33 0.23 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.05 0.06 c0.31 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.38 0.13 0.78 0.15 0.57 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 7.1 7.2 6.4 9.1 6.8 8.3 9.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.3 0.1 5.2 0.2 1.0 6.8 Delay (s)8.2 7.5 6.5 14.3 7.0 9.3 16.1 Level of Service A A A B A A B Approach Delay (s)7.7 13.6 9.0 16.1 Approach LOS ABAB Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 11.7 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 36.8 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 336 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 17: Elm Wy & 9th Ave S HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 15 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 10 30 5 111 40 160 5 695 180 100 440 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1656 1425 1617 1425 1676 1425 1593 1671 Flt Permitted 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.22 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1656 1425 1617 1425 1672 1425 377 1671 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 11 33 5 121 43 174 5 755 196 109 478 11 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000142000000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 44 5 0 164 32 0 760 196 109 489 0 Turn Type Split Prot Split Prot Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 444888 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s)4.8 4.8 12.3 12.3 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 Effective Green, g (s)6.8 6.8 14.3 14.3 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.19 0.19 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 Clearance Time (s)5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)146 126 300 264 1019 869 230 1019 v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.00 c0.10 0.02 0.29 v/s Ratio Perm c0.45 0.14 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.04 0.55 0.12 0.75 0.23 0.47 0.48 Uniform Delay, d1 32.9 32.2 28.5 26.2 10.8 6.8 8.3 8.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.1 2.0 0.2 3.0 0.1 1.5 0.4 Delay (s)34.1 32.3 30.5 26.4 13.8 6.9 9.8 8.7 Level of Service C C C C BAAA Approach Delay (s)33.9 28.4 12.4 8.9 Approach LOS C C B A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 14.6 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.1 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 337 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 18: Edmonds Wy & 100th Ave W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 16 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 73 759 201 214 780 311 291 575 191 267 369 39 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3428 1770 3388 1770 3407 1770 3489 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3428 1770 3388 1770 3407 1770 3489 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 79 825 218 233 848 338 316 625 208 290 401 42 RTOR Reduction (vph)000000000000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 79 1043 0 233 1186 0 316 833 0 290 443 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 5.6 34.4 16.5 45.3 22.6 27.5 18.0 22.9 Effective Green, g (s) 6.6 36.9 17.5 47.8 23.6 30.0 19.0 25.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.32 0.15 0.41 0.20 0.26 0.16 0.22 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 101 1096 268 1403 362 886 291 768 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.30 c0.13 0.35 c0.18 c0.24 c0.16 0.13 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.78 0.95 0.87 0.85 0.87 0.94 1.00 0.58 Uniform Delay, d1 53.7 38.4 47.8 30.5 44.4 41.8 48.2 40.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 31.6 16.8 24.5 4.9 20.0 17.5 51.5 1.1 Delay (s)85.3 55.2 72.3 35.3 64.5 59.3 99.6 41.3 Level of Service F E E D E E F D Approach Delay (s)57.3 41.4 60.7 64.4 Approach LOS E D E E Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 54.3 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 115.4 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 338 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 19: 238th St SW & SR 99 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 17 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 214 76 150 30 76 20 290 1615 40 60 1423 151 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1583 1801 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.65 1.00 0.80 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1211 1583 1462 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 233 83 163 33 83 22 315 1755 43 65 1547 164 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 118 08000190088 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 316 45 0 130 0 315 1755 24 65 1547 76 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s)24.5 24.5 24.5 16.2 48.2 48.2 4.8 36.8 36.8 Effective Green, g (s)25.0 25.0 25.0 16.7 50.7 50.7 5.3 39.3 39.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.19 0.56 0.56 0.06 0.44 0.44 Clearance Time (s)3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 5.5 5.5 3.5 5.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)336 440 406 328 1994 892 104 1545 691 v/s Ratio Prot c0.18 0.50 0.04 c0.44 v/s Ratio Perm c0.26 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.10 0.32 0.96 0.88 0.03 0.62 1.00 0.11 Uniform Delay, d1 31.8 24.2 25.8 36.3 17.0 8.7 41.4 25.4 15.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 33.8 0.1 0.5 39.0 6.0 0.1 11.1 23.2 0.3 Delay (s)65.6 24.3 26.2 75.4 23.0 8.8 52.5 48.6 15.3 Level of Service E C C E C A D D B Approach Delay (s)51.5 26.2 30.5 45.6 Approach LOS DCCD Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 38.6 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 90.0 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 339 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 20: 238th St SW & Edmonds Wy HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 18 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 5 5 10 20 5 267 20 1395 70 130 993 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.93 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 1790 1583 1770 3514 1770 3534 Flt Permitted 0.96 0.83 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1654 1549 1583 1770 3514 1770 3534 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 5 5 11 22 5 290 22 1516 76 141 1079 11 RTOR Reduction (vph)09000119050010 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 12 0 0 27 171 22 1587 0 141 1089 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 Actuated Green, G (s)10.4 10.4 10.4 0.7 30.8 4.0 34.1 Effective Green, g (s)11.4 11.4 11.4 1.7 31.8 5.0 35.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.56 0.09 0.61 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)330 309 315 53 1954 155 2169 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.45 c0.08 0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.02 c0.11 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.09 0.54 0.42 0.81 0.91 0.50 Uniform Delay, d1 18.5 18.7 20.6 27.3 10.3 25.9 6.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.1 1.9 5.2 2.7 46.1 0.2 Delay (s)18.5 18.8 22.5 32.5 13.0 71.9 6.4 Level of Service B B C C B E A Approach Delay (s)18.5 22.1 13.2 13.9 Approach LOS B C B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 14.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 57.2 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 340 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 21: 244th St SW & 76th Ave W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 19 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 40 1718 80 370 1800 160 190 230 380 100 160 30 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3516 3433 3496 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3516 3433 3496 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 1867 87 402 1957 174 207 250 413 109 174 33 RTOR Reduction (vph)00000000560029 Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 1954 0 402 2131 0 207 250 357 109 174 4 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot pm+ov Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 52316 Permitted Phases 26 Actuated Green, G (s) 3.6 80.9 17.0 94.3 17.0 25.0 42.0 9.2 17.2 17.2 Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 82.9 18.0 96.3 18.0 26.0 44.0 10.2 18.2 18.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.03 0.56 0.12 0.65 0.12 0.17 0.30 0.07 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)55 1955 414 2258 214 325 499 121 227 193 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.56 c0.12 0.61 c0.12 c0.13 c0.09 0.06 0.09 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.78 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.97 0.77 0.71 0.90 0.77 0.02 Uniform Delay, d1 71.8 33.1 65.3 23.9 65.3 58.7 46.9 68.9 63.4 57.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 50.5 20.1 36.5 8.9 51.6 10.5 4.8 52.3 14.3 0.0 Delay (s)122.2 53.2 101.8 32.9 116.9 69.2 51.8 121.2 77.7 57.7 Level of Service F D F C F E D F E E Approach Delay (s)54.6 43.8 72.3 90.6 Approach LOS D D E F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 54.5 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 149.1 Sum of lost time (s)6.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 341 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 22: 244th St SW & SR 99 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 280 230 130 340 440 320 120 1379 130 80 878 140 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3348 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3348 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 304 250 141 370 478 348 130 1499 141 87 954 152 RTOR Reduction (vph)0000010000700049 Lane Group Flow (vph) 304 391 0 370 478 248 130 1499 71 87 954 103 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.2 15.1 20.0 17.9 17.9 9.4 42.3 42.3 4.7 37.6 37.6 Effective Green, g (s) 18.2 17.1 21.0 19.9 19.9 10.4 42.3 43.3 5.7 37.6 38.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.17 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.43 0.44 0.06 0.38 0.39 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 325 578 375 711 318 186 1511 692 102 1343 617 v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 0.12 c0.21 0.14 c0.07 c0.42 c0.05 0.27 v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.04 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.68 0.99 0.67 0.78 0.70 0.99 0.10 0.85 0.71 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 39.9 38.4 38.9 36.6 37.5 42.8 28.2 16.4 46.3 26.1 19.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 33.2 3.1 42.5 2.5 11.7 10.9 21.2 0.1 45.9 1.8 0.1 Delay (s)73.1 41.5 81.4 39.1 49.2 53.7 49.4 16.5 92.2 27.9 19.9 Level of Service E D F DDDDBFCB Approach Delay (s)55.3 55.1 47.1 31.6 Approach LOS E E D C Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 46.4 HCM Level of Service D HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 99.1 Sum of lost time (s)9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 342 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 23: 238th St. SW & 100th Av. W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 21 Movement EBL EBR EBR2 NBL NBT SBT SBR SBR2 NEL NER Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 93 10 110 130 855 233 285 163 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.90 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1583 1770 3539 3190 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1583 1770 3539 3190 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 101 11 120 141 929 253 310 177 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 72 0 0 0 44 0000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 101 59 0 141 929 696 0000 Turn Type Perm Prot Protected Phases 4 1 6 2 Permitted Phases 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.3 26.3 6.0 25.5 20.3 Effective Green, g (s) 26.3 26.3 6.0 26.5 21.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.40 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 710 635 162 1430 1036 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.08 c0.26 0.22 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.09 0.87 0.65 0.95dr Uniform Delay, d1 12.5 12.2 29.4 15.8 19.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.13 0.73 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 31.0 0.8 1.7 Delay (s)12.6 12.3 64.3 12.4 20.9 Level of Service B B E B C Approach Delay (s) 12.4 19.2 20.9 0.0 Approach LOS B B C A Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 19.0 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.6 Sum of lost time (s)8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 343 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Improvement 24: 238th St. SW & Firdale Av.HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 22 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 410 30 30 20 20 20 30 555 20 10 243 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.96 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1769 1750 1770 3521 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.71 0.84 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1306 1487 1770 3521 1770 3539 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 446 33 33 22 22 22 33 603 22 11 264 0 RTOR Reduction (vph)0400130040000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 508 0 0 53 0 33 621 0 11 264 0 Turn Type Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s)26.3 26.3 6.0 25.5 0.8 20.3 Effective Green, g (s)26.3 26.3 6.0 26.5 0.8 21.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.40 0.01 0.32 Clearance Time (s)4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s)3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)524 596 162 1422 22 1149 v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.18 0.01 0.07 v/s Ratio Perm c0.39 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.09 0.20 0.44 0.50 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 19.3 12.2 27.6 14.2 32.2 16.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.26 0.82 Incremental Delay, d2 31.1 0.1 0.6 0.2 12.4 0.1 Delay (s)50.4 12.3 28.2 14.4 53.0 13.4 Level of Service D B C B D B Approach Delay (s)50.4 12.3 15.1 15.0 Approach LOS D B B B Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 26.9 HCM Level of Service C HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 65.6 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 344 of 349 SYNCHRO REPORT ANALYSIS OF EDMONDS WAY/100TH AVENUE E WITH PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGE AND 100TH AVENUE W ROAD DIET Packet Page 345 of 349 City of Edmonds 2025 Model PM+Proposed LU_with Impr+100th Ave Road Diet 18: Edmonds Wy & 100th Ave W HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10/30/2008 5:00 pm Synchro 7 - Report J&S, revised by HTi Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 73 759 201 214 780 311 291 575 191 267 369 39 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3428 1770 3388 1770 1793 1770 1836 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.10 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3428 1770 3388 381 1793 186 1836 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 79 825 218 233 848 338 316 625 208 290 401 42 RTOR Reduction (vph)000000000000 Lane Group Flow (vph) 79 1043 0 233 1186 0 316 833 0 290 443 0 Turn Type Prot Prot pm+pt pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 5.0 29.8 16.7 41.5 58.5 45.5 48.0 39.0 Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 32.3 17.7 44.0 59.5 48.0 50.0 41.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.27 0.15 0.37 0.50 0.40 0.42 0.35 Clearance Time (s)4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 4.0 5.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph)89 923 261 1242 380 717 210 635 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.30 c0.13 0.35 c0.11 0.46 c0.12 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.30 c0.46 v/c Ratio 0.89 1.13 0.89 0.95 0.83 1.16 1.38 0.70 Uniform Delay, d1 56.7 43.9 50.2 37.0 22.7 36.0 32.2 33.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 59.4 72.2 29.4 15.9 14.3 87.8 198.3 3.3 Delay (s)116.0 116.1 79.6 52.9 37.0 123.8 230.5 37.2 Level of Service F F E D D F F D Approach Delay (s)116.1 57.3 99.9 113.7 Approach LOS F E F F Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 92.6 HCM Level of Service F HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s)12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min)15 c Critical Lane Group Packet Page 346 of 349 ATTACHMENT C PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS – COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Packet Page 347 of 349 Table C-1. Recommended Capital Roadway Improvements through 2025 Project Category/Location Improvement Jurisdiction Concurrency Projects by 2015 4 Puget Drive and 88th Avenue W Install traffic signal.1 Edmonds 10 212th Street SW and 84th Ave W (Currently in design phase) Install a single-lane roundabout. Edmonds 11 Main Street and 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal.2 Edmonds 12 Walnut Street and 9th Avenue S Install traffic signal.2 Edmonds 2 Olympic View Drive and 76th Ave W Install traffic signal. Widen 76th to add a westbound left turn lane for 175-foot storage length. Edmonds 9 212th Street SW and 76th Ave W (Currently in design phase) Widen 76th to add a northbound left turn lane for 250-foot storage length and a southbound left turn lane for 125-foot storage length. Provide protected left turn phase for northbound and southbound movements. Widen 212th to add a westbound right turn lane for 50-foot storage length. Edmonds 15 220th Street SW and 76th Ave W Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and a through-right lane. Change eastbound and westbound phase to provide protected-permitted phase for eastbound left turn. Provide right turn phase for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase. Edmonds Concurrency Projects by 2025 1 174th St SW and Olympic View Dr Widen Olympic View Dr to add a northbound left turn lane for 50-foot storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Edmonds 6 Caspers Street and 9th Avenue N Install traffic signal. Edmonds 8 212th Street SW and SR 99 Widen 212th to add a westbound left turn lane for 200-foot storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300-foot storage length. Provide protected left turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. Edmonds 14 220th Street SW and SR 99 Widen 220th to add westbound right turn lane for 325-foot storage length. Widen SR 99 add second southbound left turn lane for 275-foot storage length. Edmonds Packet Page 348 of 349 Project Category/Location Improvement Jurisdiction State Highway Improvement Projects 20 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way Install a signal and provide protected left turn phase for northbound and southbound. Edmonds/ WSDOT 21 244th Street SW and 76th Ave W Widen 244th to add second westbound left turn lane for 325-foot storage length. Provide right turn phase for northbound movement during westbound left turn phase. Edmonds/ WSDOT Safety Projects 228th Street SW, at SR 99 and 76th Avenue W (Currently in design phase) Construct connection of 228th Street SW between SR 99 and 76th Avenue W (three lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes and sidewalk). Install traffic signals at 228th Street SW / SR 99 and 228th Street SW / 76th Avenue W. Install median on SR 99 to prohibit southbound left turn movements at 76th Avenue W. Edmonds SR 99 at 216th Street SW Widen to allow one left turn lane and one through lane in eastbound and westbound directions, with 100-foot storage length for turn lanes. Edmonds 238th Street SW, between Edmonds Way and 84th Avenue W Widen to three lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk. Edmonds 84th Avenue W, between 212th Street S and 238th Street SW Widen to three lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes and sidewalk. Edmonds/ Snohomish County SR 99 illumination Improve roadway safety with illumination. Edmonds Shell Valley New road to improve emergency vehicle access and non-motorized access. Edmonds Main Street and 3rd Avenue Upgrade signal to reduce conflicts with trucks. Edmonds Source: City of Edmonds, Comprehensive Transportation Plan, 2009. 1. Analysis indicates that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right-turn-only (prohibiting left-turn and through movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. 2. Analysis indicates that identified deficiencies could also be addressed by removal of parking along the entire length of 9th Avenue between the northbound approach of Walnut and the southbound approach of Main, and restriping and signing so that this section of 9th would be 4 lanes wide. This would result in two lanes of traffic at the northbound and southbound stop-controlled approaches of both intersections. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. Packet Page 349 of 349