Loading...
2022-11-07 City Council - SP Agenda-3311Op E D o Agenda Edmonds City Council tnl. }nyo SPECIAL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 NOVEMBER 7, 2022, 7:00 PM PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE. COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. 6. RECEIVED FOR FILING Edmonds City Council Agenda November 7, 2022 Page 1 1. Written Public Comments (0 min) 2. Council Appointment to a Board/Commission (0 min) 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of October 25, 2022 2. Approval of Council Regular Meeting Minutes of October 25, 2022 3. Approval of Council Regular Meeting Minutes of November 1, 2022 4. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 5. Approval of claim checks and wire payments. 6. Regular Property Tax Ordinance for 2023 Tax Levy and EMS Levy Ordinance 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Potential Action on BD2 Designated Street Front Code Amendment (AMD2022-0003) (15 min) 2. Departmental Budget Review: Planning & Development; Parks, Recreation, Human Services (120 min) 3. Edmonds City Attorney Work Group Status Report (30 min) 9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda November 7, 2022 Page 2 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Written Public Comments Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of written public comments. Narrative Public comments submitted to the web form for public comments <https://www.edmondswa.gov/publiccomment> between October 20, 2022 to November 2, 2022. Attachments: Public Written Comment for November 7, 2022 Packet Pg. 3 6.1.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments 11/7/2022 Submitted on: 10/28/2022 7:11:32 PM Name: John Kennedy City of Residence: Brier Agenda Topic: Amendments to Chapter 16.43 of the ECDC Comments: Hello, I own the property at 617 Dayton St., Edmonds, WA. The original building was designed and built as an apartment building sometime in the 1970's. As such this building was not designed to accommodate your new rules. There is affordable housing in this building. There is a shortage of affordable housing in Edmonds. To require me to rent out an existing apartment as an office could cause hardship. I request that multifamily use to be allowed on the ground level should I wish to remodel. To have to displace an existing residential tenant would be a hardship on them and myself. It is easy for me at this location to rent apartments. This is why I paid a premium price on the property when I purchased it. I have had trouble historically renting the office space that is now in the building. There have been long, long periods of vacancy. Office space here can be difficult to rent. Apartment rental is easy. Because of the building design in 1970, to accommodate your new rules for my building creates several hardships. Is there an option to Grandfather the original use of the building and still allow me to remodel? If there is anything you can do to help me out I would appreciate it. I have thought seriously about remodeling the building. If this option were to effectively become unfeasible to me it would be a hardship. I have dreamed of remodeling this building. Have you considered that adopting this rule could punish owners as myself and my tenants? Thank you for your consideration of my written comments as I will be out of town at the time of the meeting. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. Sincerely, John Kennedy Submitted on: 10/30/2022 6:41:38 AM Name: Ken Reidy City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Presentation and Public Hearing on Property Taxes Comments: I oppose increasing the regular property tax rate, but I am okay with the EMS levy. I also encourage City Council to discuss whether City Council can waive all "banked capacity" in place. Because property tax revenues provide 33% of the general fund budget, I think that carries with it a responsibility for the City Council to represent all citizens, including property owners. I believe Edmonds City Council has historically used part of property tax revenues to contract with a City Attorney. If so, this is problematic because the City Attorney has stated, he does not necessarily represent the interests of individual property owners. This is illustrated by his comments during the August 14, 2019 Planning Board Meeting: Taraday - 1:23:10 mark of the August 14, 2019 Planning Board Meeting: "I represent the City of Edmonds. I'm here to advance the interest of the City of Edmonds, not individual property owners." I would feel better about paying property taxes to the city if the mayor, city staff and directors c m E 0 U v 3 a c m Packet Pg. 4 6.1.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments 11/7/2022 responded to all citizen emails and remember their code of conduct: "The city's primary function is to provide service to the citizens of Edmonds. To achieve that goal, all employees are expected to treat the public as their most valued customer. All employees are expected to serve the public in a professional manner which is courteous, efficient and helpful." I would feel better about paying property taxes to the city if elected officials responded to all citizen emails and followed their code of ethics, which includes keeping the community informed, encouraging communications between the citizens and municipal officers, and friendly and courteous service to the public. I would feel better about paying property taxes to the city if the city had executed the Code Rewrite with the hundreds of thousands of dollars previously budgeted for such. I would feel better about paying property taxes to the city if the p Y g p Y gp p Y Y �' c city government consistently followed state and city laws, including collecting all Leasehold Excise Tax CD E required under state law. I urge all city officials to please make improvements, so Edmonds property c owners are better served related to the property taxes they pay. v a Submitted on: 10/30/2022 6:57:01 AM L Name: Ken Reidy City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: General Audience Comments for November 1, 2022 Council Meeting Comments: I start by discussing comments I made almost 9 years ago. The December 3, 2013 City Council meeting minutes indicate that I said the code rewrite is the biggest issue facing the City and that establishing a comprehensive, accurate, consistent and easy to administer City code is critical to the CityA€"'s efforts to provide a high level of government service that invites economic and other beneficial activities. I described the difference between the Edmonds City Code (ECC), also known as the Edmonds Municipal Code, and the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The ECC consists of Title 1-10 that address issues such as health, safety, finance, officials, boards and commissions. The ECDC consists of Titles 15-23 that address building, planning, land use, public works, design and natural resources. The minutes indicate I said that both parts of the Code require update. The minutes indicate I urged City Council to give the complex Code rewrite the attention it deserved. Prior to moving forward with an annual budget process for 2023, please review ECC 1.02.060 and make sure you are following our City Code. Please note the word "shall" in ECC 1.02.060. Shall means it is mandatory. ECC 1.02.060 requires a review of the mid -biennial budget to commence no sooner than eight months after the start nor later than conclusion of the first year of the fiscal biennium. Public hearings on the proposed budget modification are required to be heard prior to the adoption of the ordinance modifying the biennial budget. Ordinance 3671 established this City Code and Ordinance 3671 has never been repealed. This is our City Code. Doesn't that mean something? If not, why do we have laws? After City Council figures out how Council can approve an Annual Budget when our Code requires a Biennial Budget, please remember - the ECDC is not the only thing that needs to be updated - the ECC also requires update. Please budget accordingly. Also please appreciate, the Code rewrite has been budgeted for many times over the years. Budgeting is one thing. Executing the budget is another thing. Does Council have any idea what Council can do to represent your constituents if your budget is not executed? Has anybody asked? PLEASE also review how city government obtains its legal advice as part of your budgeting Packet Pg. 5 6.1.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments 11/7/2022 process. Please inform the public why an RFQ for Legal Services was not issued earlier in 2022 when all knew the Contract with Lighthouse Law Group was expiring December 31, 2022. Why did this failure to issue an RFQ take place? Thank you. Submitted on: 10/31/2022 9:20:05 PM Name: Natalie Seitz City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: budget hearing Comments • Please prioritize the investment of the local tax dollars to address the most pressing hazards, public health issues and resource disparities faced by Edmonds residents in this year's budget. This plea gets to the heart of my continued concerns with the City budget. The budget is not infinite so by asking that the City prioritize the most pressing needs first, I am asking you to recognize the health of Edmonds residents above the "nice to haves." Study after study shows that the lack of parks, open space and access to a clean and healthy environment impacts the health outcomes of communities. This Parks CFP/CIP identifies nearly $27M dollars downtown and less than $4M in the SR99 corridor and approximately $6M in South Edmonds. Please recognize the health consequences that the City places on underserved, poorer and more diverse areas of Edmonds with this 6-year Parks CIP/CFP. • With regard to parks: the new park acquisition budgets are too low to secure adequately sized parcels in underserved areas. Additionally the city has not selected a preferred daylight alignment for Willow Creek or conducted the necessary environmental reviews making the acquisition of the Unocal property a Pre-determinal action. Acquisition was not ID as necessary in the alternatives study for the marina beach alignment and other types of property interest would suffice at reduced taxpayer burden and City liability. • With regard to public works: o I support the Citywide lighting study. Given what we know about crime, downtown (PWT 44) is not the most pressing area need for street lights o Just like last year I would like PWT 50 sidewalk improvements to go the extra couple feet and be the first sidewalk to allow direct safe access to Matthey Ballinger Park o With regard to PWD - 06, the feasible study determined that a regional stormwater facility was not possible at Matthey Ballinger park. Why is this project still in the CIP and identified as a regional facility, creating contaminated ditches in parks and displacing impacts from the SR99 up zone into this residential community is not a good thing and this project should be removed. Please shift the funding from PWD-06 to PWD-22 and add the Matthey Ballinger Park to the City Stormwater Maintenance Projects list o Please note that there are currently two burned out buildings and complexes in the corridor. Are you sure these fire service facility investments are in the area of greatest need? o Please also consider the boys and girls club, museum, fishing pier type investments as recurring amenity costs in a well served area. Could recurring amenity investments be provided more equitably across the City? Thank you for your time and consideration of these comments. Submitted on: 11/1/2022 6:30:13 AM Name: Ken Reidy c m E 0 U a c m Packet Pg. 6 6.1.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments 11/7/2022 City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Public Hearing on the 2023 Proposed Budget Comments: Mayor Mike Nelson, a man whose Administration set up a hate portal, a man who accused unnamed City Councilmembers of bullying City Staff, and a man who called actions of the Washington State Supreme Court "barbaric", is proposing an in-house city prosecutor. One of Mayor Mike Nelson's stated reasons for proposing such is a€oechallenges with oversight of work being performedACM. Please do not consider this proposal under Mayor Mike Nelson's administration. Next, the November 20, 2012 City Council Meeting Minutes document the following public comments: Ken Reidy, Edmonds, recalled U) c during the October 25, 2005 City Council meeting, former Development Services Director Duane m E Bowman said he had been describing the need to update the zoning code since he was hired in 2000. c The comment was also made that the City's code dated to the 1980s and piecemeal amendments make it difficult to use and administer. Former City Attorney Scott Snyder stated in his November 2007 City Attorney annual report that the biggest issue at the start of 2007 was the code rewrite. Mr. Snyder a stated the intent was to begin the rewrite last year (2006) and finish it this year (2007). Mr. Snyder c +; summarized that the code rewrite was approximately a year behind schedule as of November 2007. Mr. Reidy pointed out five years have passed and he questioned why the code rewrite had not been completed. He urged the Council to include the proper amount in the 2013 budget to complete the long overdue code rewrite from start to finish. Code rewrite money has been budgeted multiple times, but Edmonds Mayors have failed repeatedly to execute the budget. City Councils have refused to represent their constituents by holding Mayors and staff accountable. To the 2022 City Council, I urge you to include the proper amount in the 2023 budget to complete the long overdue code rewrite from start to finish. Also, the entire City Code needs to be updated. The Edmonds City Code (ECC) - (sometimes called Edmonds Municipal Code - EMC) also requires a Code Rewrite. The ECC consists of Titles 1 through 10 and addresses issues such as health, safety, finance, officials, boards and commissions. Both parts of the CODE require Rewrite and that has been true for many, many years. Please budget accordingly. Submitted on: 11/1/2022 6:59:39 AM Name: Ken Reidy City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Public Hearing on Revenue Sources Comments: I can find no evidence we had this specific Public Hearing last year. If so, please explain why we are having a Public Hearing on Revenue Sources this year when we did not do so last year. Property owners are treated unfairly by Edmonds City Government due to the City government's refusal to collect all Leasehold Excise Tax owed. Resolution 1451, resolved by Edmonds City Council on April 21, 2020, includes the following words: PROVIDED THAT if there is no way to avoid paying leasehold excise tax to the state, then such tax shall be collected from the tenants. Do Edmonds City Officials think it okay to strategize to avoid paying Leasehold Excise Tax to the state? On January 15, 2022, 1 formally requested Mayor Mike Nelson and his staff inform the Washington State Department of Revenue (DOR) that the City of Edmonds and/or private users of public property owe additional Leasehold Excise Tax from the Packet Pg. 7 6.1.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments 11/7/2022 past. I said I think it would be wise to proactively engage with DOR and work together to determine the amount owed. I recommend a review period covering at least twelve years, unless DOR desires a different range of dates. As I've told City Officials before, I have received the following response from the Washington State Department of Revenue (DOR): Response: Thank you for the information you have provided regarding activities that take place in Edmonds involving the use of public property for streateries. General tax application LET may apply to streateries when the following are true: • The public entity owns the property (in this case, the public right of way). • The public entity issues the private party a street obstruction or other use permit to possess and use a defined portion of the public right of way. • The permit duration is for thirty continuous days or longer. • Annual costs for the private party to possess and use the property are $250 or more, as determined by fair market value. As you appear to be aware, the Department's current position on the issue is outlined in our Tax Topic article titled Street Obstruction and other Use Permits — Leasehold Excise Tax. Additional information regarding the leasehold excise tax is also available on our website. Submitted on: 11/2/2022 7:19:47 AM Name: Ken Reidy City of Residence: Edmonds Agenda Topic: Audience Comments for November 2, 2022 Special Meeting Comments: Following are my current thoughts on the BID, limited by the character count available. A huge problem with both Resolutions 1284 and 1285 is that the related agenda packets both include an Edmonds Downtown Business Improvement District Committee Memorandum and Report to Mayor and City Council that made the following representation: "A petition was created and the Edmonds Downtown BID Committee has been collecting signatures of business owners supportive of creating a BID. The committee has signed petitions from businesses that collectively pay at least 60% of the total funds that would be collected from the assessment within the BID." So, both Resolution 1284 and 1285 were passed under the influence of false information provided by the Edmonds Downtown BID Committee. I don't know why Council was not told: While there was a substantial effort put into collecting signatures for a petition, it was realized in course of the review of those signatures that it would not meet the legal standard for a petition. This had to be known on November 27, 2012 or earlier because City Attorney Jeff Taraday stated the following during the November 10, 2014 Council Meeting: "City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained the BID process can start either with a petition or a resolution. While there was a substantial effort put into collecting signatures for a petition, it was realized in course of the review of those signatures that it would not meet the legal standard for a petition and it was recommended the process be initiated by resolution which the Council did with Resolution 1284." We then move to Ordinance 3909, passed by City Council on January 15, 2013 after a 4-3 vote. I think the key point here is to appreciate that RCW 35.87A.100, the law that governs adoption of an Ordinance to establish and the required contents of the Ordinance, contains a direct link to RCW 35.87A.010. RCW 35.87A.010 is where the following requirement to establish is found: To establish, after a petition submitted by the operators responsible for sixty percent of the assessments by businesses and multifamily residential or mixed -use projects within the area, parking and business improvement areas This is why when one looks at the RCW taken as a whole, I believe it very clear that a petition submitted U) c m E E 0 U 0 a c m Packet Pg. 8 6.1.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments 11/7/2022 by the operators responsible for sixty percent of the assessments is required to establish. If this were not true, there would be no limits on City Council's ability to establish a BID anywhere it wants. The process would not have to involve a petition at all. c m E E 0 U v 3 d c m Packet Pg. 9 6.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Council Appointment to a Board/Commission Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Volunteer boards and commissions serve our community by providing advice and recommendations to the Mayor and City Council regarding programs, activities, and issues unique to their mission and purpose. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative. Councilmember Jenna Nand appoints Lucy Lakefish to the Youth Commission, seat #8. Packet Pg. 10 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Approval of Council Special Meeting Minutes of October 25, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E102522 Special Packet Pg. 11 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/ DRAFT MINUTES October 25, 2022 STAFF PRESENT Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., & Human Serv. Dir. Rob English, City Engineer Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. 2. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. 96TH AVE INFILTRATION PROJECT CONTRACT (CIVIC PARK MITIGATION Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director Angie Feser explained this is a mitigation project required for the completion of Civic Park and as a stormwater project, it is eligible for ARPA funds. In early September, council approved APRA funding of up to $450,000 for this project. The project went out to bid in September and the October 11 bid opening had 10 responsive bids. The lowest responsive bidder was Blue Mountain Construction Group at $359,844, approximately $30,000 lower than the engineer's estimate. Background checks have been done on Blue Mountain and staff is asking for approval of that contract plus a management reserve and additional funds for construction management, inspection and testing. Although work will not begin until January, this request is being made now due to an 8-10 week lead time on materials. The bid process and documents have been reviewed and approved by the city attorney. Councilmember Buckshnis asked for a breakdown of the funding. Ms. Feser answered the contract with Blue Mountain Construction Group is $359,844. The request is for an additional $90,000 which includes approximately $9,000 for construction management, approximately $2,000 for testing, approximately $7,000 for inspections and a management reserve of $72,000. It is unlikely the management reserve will be spent, but it is estimated at 20% based on the fact it is a winter project which can result in additional delays. Any unexpended funds will go back into the ARPA bucket. Councilmember Teitzel asked if the entire amount, the $359,844 plus the management reserve, was funded by ARPA funds. Ms. Feser answered it is, up to $450,000 is covered by ARPA funds. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 12 7.1.a Councilmember Teitzel referred to the statement in background/history in the agenda memo which states the drainage facility will include four distribution chambers and catch basins at each end for maintenance access as well as an overflow connection back to the existing 24" stormwater pipe. He asked if that stormwater pipe drains into Shell Creek, recognizing there are erosion and stormwater surge issues and he wondered if this will mitigate those issues. City Engineer Rob English said he believes it does drain to Shell Creek. Ms. Feser said this will help with those issues because the stormwater is placed into a pipe that intercepts the water and infiltrates it into the soil rather than going down the pipe and into the Shell Creek Valley. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON AND SECONDED, TO APPROVE THE CONTACT AWARD AND THE ADDITIONAL AMOUNT FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, TESTING AND INSPECTION AND MANAGEMENT RESERVE. Council President Olson thanked Ms. Feser for responding to her questions. As a result, she learned if the appropriation is not spent, it will come back to council and can be spent in a different way. Councilmember Buckshnis observed anything not spent will go back into the ARPA funds. Ms. Feser answered yes, as it is an allocation from ARPA funds. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. PRESENTATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN/RIGHT OF WAY PHASES OF HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 3 Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss explained the presentations for stages 3 and 4 are very similar. He reviewed: • Highway 99 Revitalization Stages o Stage 1: Corridor study with conceptual plan sheets/planning level estimate from 244t' to 210th o Stage 2: Raised median from 244th to 210t'', Gateway signs on both ends, and HAWK signal (just north of 234t' St SW) o Stage 3: from 244t' to 238' o Stage 4: from 224' to 220' o Stage 5: from 216t' to 212' o Stage 6: from 238t' to 234' o Stage 7: from 234' to 228' o Stage 8: from 228' to 224' o Stage 9: from 220t' to 216' • Photographs of, 1) prior condition, south of 238' looking southbound, and 2) partial construction of raised median replacing 2-way left turn lane • Project description o Segment along Highway 99 from 244' St SW to 238th St SW o Capacity improvements with additional NB left turn lane at Highway 99 @ 238th St SW o Lighting enhancement o Planter strip on both sides of the street o New sidewalk on both sides of the street o Better stormwater management o Targeted utility replacements (water/sewer) o Potential undergrounding of overhead utilities o Softscape treatments Project benefits Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 13 7.1.a o Economic vitality/pedestrian safety/capacity improvements Proposed section of Highway 99 Stage 3 Highway99$tage3 xxn aavnzv — PwPowd Secdon at Full Median Right-0bWay:114'M7t4' Scope of work (as part of professional services agreement) o Survey o Geotechnical report o Environmental documentation o Public outreach o Utility coordination 0 30% 60% 90%, 95%, 100% and final PS&E (including design of water/sewer/stormwater and potential conversion of underground utility lines o Bid support o Start of services for right-of-way acquisition and temporary construction easements (21 parcels) Funding sources/contract cost o Total Design phase funding ($3.8 million) ■ State appropriations - Connecting Washington: $3.74 Million ■ Local Utility funding$35,990 - Fund 421 $40,000 - Fund 423 $20,000 ■ Total SCJ Design Contract $3.08 Million o ROW Phase ■ State appropriation - Connecting Washington: $1,064,000 - Move Ahead Washington: $1,354,000 ■ Total funds available for phase $2,418,000 ■ Start of SCJ ROW contract $ 135,000 Preliminary total project cost o Design $3.8 M o Right-of-way $2.4M o Construction $26.8M o Total project cost $33 M Minor revisions to agreement 1. All - minor edits to the contract totals 2. All - added headers to all exhibits 3. All - added the contract # and page X of Y to all pages of the contracts 4. Exhibit A: Scope of work - onsite treatment and detention clarification 5. Exhibit A: Scope of work - project description clarification/scope reorganization 6. Exhibit B: SBE/DBE targets and first page of contract - corrected SBE/DBE targets and contract totals 7. Exhibit B: SBE/DBE targets - removed 2" a copy of Exhibit B 8. Exhibit D-1: Overall fee - fee reorganization to match the scope reorganization Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 14 7.1.a 9. Exhibit D-1: Overall fee —minor adjustments to the level of estimate for SCJ 10. Exhibit D-1: renumbered all phase in Stage 4 (phases 51-78) so they do not match with Stage 3 (Phases 1-28) 11. Exhibit E-1: Fee for 1 Alliance - added summary Staff recommendation o Add revised agreement to Consent Agenda for November 1, 2022 Council meeting. Councilmember Chen commented he was excited to see the progress being made on Highway 99. He asked why there was only one response to the RFQ when the City typically receives three bids for projects this size. City Engineer Rob English responded this is a professional consultant contract versus the contractor that is constructing the median on Highway 99. In accordance with the City's purchasing policy, an RFQ was issued which is published in the Daily Journal of Commerce (DJC) and Everett Herald. One response was received from SCJ. In his opinion, consultants are busy and there is a great deal of work in this market. If a couple consultants respond to an RFQ, that is a lot. SCJ was the designer on Stage 2 so the consultant community may select other projects, knowing that SCJ might be submitting on this project as well. He summarized the current market conditions likely resulted in one submittal. Mr. English recognized Lisa Reed, the SCJ project manager who was attending remotely to answer any technical questions related to the scope of work. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed, there are problems with consultant supply and demand all over the world. She observed the City received $240 million from the state for Highway 99. She asked if that was part of Connect Washington and Move Ahead Washing or was the City leveraging funds dedicated by the transportation budget. Mr. English answered he was not familiar with the $240 million figure Councilmember Buckshnis referenced. The City received $22.5 million from the Move Ahead Washington transportation package this spring; so that, coupled with the $16.5 million previous secured under Connecting Washington, another state transportation funding program, provides close to $40 million. The City also secured several federal grants in Stage 4. The goal is to leverage the money, using state money to match federal funds in Stage 4. If there is a shortfall in the construction in Stage 3, the state funds would be used to match any potential grant such as through the Transportation Improvement Board or other federal programs in the Infrastructure Bill. He summarized staff will try to maximize or leverage the funds that have been secured to secure additional future grants. Councilmember Buckshnis acknowledged she may have her numbers wrong, it may be $24 million and not $240 million. Regarding potential undergrounding, Councilmember Teitzel relayed his understanding that undergrounding was not done very often anywhere in the City due to the cost. He was concerned about the potential cost on Highway 99 as well. Each segment of this project includes potential undergrounding so the consultant will consider that for each segment. He asked how much the cost of the contract could be reduced if potential undergrounding were deleted from the scope now. Mr. English answered there is an initial evaluation as part of the design contract to provide a better cost estimate for making a decision on undergrounding. Councilmember Teitzel said would prefer to prioritize investments in the general Highway 99 area such as sidewalks rather than undergrounding. He may request undergrounding be removed. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO SEND THE REVISED AGREEMENT WITH SCJ ALLIANCE FOR THE HIGHWAY 99 STAGE 3 DESIGN PROJECT TO NEXT WEEK'S CONSENT AGENDA, NOVEMBER 1. Councilmember Nand referred to construction that has already began on the median which has generated a lot of public comment from businesses owners and residents in the area and suggested having more public engagement and outreach before construction projects begin. For those living in the corridor, such as herself, the median is a major change. She asked staff to describe the safety enhancements provided by Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 15 7.1.a the raised median versus the restricted business access and why that is a good use of the funds. Mayor Nelson pointed out that question pertains to Stage 2, not Stage 3 or 4. Mr. Hauss answered Stage 2 was a safety improvement project. On average, there is an accident every 3 days on this 2.5 mile corridor including a lot of serious collisions over many years. This project was created to enhance safety on the corridor. With the existing 2-way left turn lane, there are too many conflict points with left and right turns as well as driveways. Creating the raised median restricts movements and creates safer movements. Cross streets and other access points on the corridor enable drivers to reach businesses so there is little inconvenience and access will be much safer. Councilmember Paine expressed support for retaining review of undergrounding overhead utilities in the consultant contract. In looking through the bipartisan infrastructure law, although there is no specific funding for undergrounding, perhaps dollars can be swapped/traded to get some big trees along the sidewalks or in the median to improve tree infrastructure to reduce heat effects. She looked forward to having bigger trees with the undergrounding of utilities. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO AMEND TO HAVE THE COUNCIL PROVIDED A DECISION PACKAGE OR POINT WHEN IT COMES TO THE UNDERGROUNDING ASPECT AS SOME COUNCILMEMBERS ARE IN FAVOR OF UNDERGROUNDING AND SOME ARE NOT. Mr. Hauss said there is a phase specifically for undergrounding which is about $200,000; adding public outreach and project management, he estimated the cost at $300,000 for Phase 3. It will be a lot more extensive in Phase 4. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with Councilmember Teitzel. Although she believes in trees, there is a nicety to undergrounding and the cost factor also needs to be weighed. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. As it was 7 p.m., Mr. Taraday recommended terminating the special meeting, starting the regular meeting, and if the council wished, the unfinished business from the special meeting could be added to the regular meeting agenda during approval of the agenda. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. PRESENTATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN/RIGHT OF WAY PHASES OF HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE. 4 This item was postponed to the regular October 25, 2022 meeting scheduled to follow this meeting. 3. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 7:01 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 16 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Approval of Council Regular Meeting Minutes of October 25, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E102522 Packet Pg. 17 7.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES October 25, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director Susan McLaughlin, Development Serv. Dir. Todd Tatum, Comm. Serv. & Econ. Dev. Dir Rob English, City Engineer Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Brad Shipley, Senior Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Tibbott read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip L Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We Q respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection Q with the land and water." N N W N 3. ROLL CALL T W City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. c m E 4. PRESENTATIONS M 1. ANNUAL PRESENTATION FROM PFD/ECA Q Ray Liaw, Board President, Edmonds Public Facilities District (EPFD) advised the EPFD is the owner and operator of the Edmonds Center for the Arts (ECA). She was pleased that she recognized all most of the council from various ECA events including the recent Gala and sponsors of a show at Center Stage. She relayed a personal anecdote, she has had the good fortune of raising her children in Edmonds and was grateful to have had the ECA in their backyard. She has fond memories of them going on elementary school field trips to matinee performances at an amazingly nominal price thanks to the partnership with local Edmonds school teachers, seeing them on stage in partnership with the school district for band performances, and training and dancing on the stage in partnership with local arts organizations. Now that Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 18 7.2.a they are high school seniors, they are grateful when their parents leave the house to go to dinner downtown and see a show at the ECA. As a member of the EPFD Board, she was incredible grateful to the City of Edmonds for the foresight of creating the public facilities district, the City's tremendous financial support including bonding capacity to purchase the land and own and maintain the building, helping the EPFD during incredibly financial difficult times the likes of which they did not think would been seen again when the doors were opened in 2008, but had experienced again with the pandemic, and most recently direct operational support the last few years. Executive Director Joe McIalwain reviewed: Thank you o Edmonds Public Facilities District / Edmonds Center for the Arts is grateful to the City of Edmonds for your long-standing support and partnership. o ECA was born of the City, and endeavors to be the cultural hub of the City — a gathering place for entertainment, celebration, and community connection. Your ongoing support is deeply appreciated and is critical to ECA's long- term health and vitality. Mission of ECA: To celebrate the performing arts, strengthen and inspire our community, and steward the development and creative use of the ECA Campus. o Goal: The arts in every life, every day. What we do: o Present music, dance, theatre, comedy and special attractions from around the world. o Serve as a home for performances and events produced by a wide range of local and regional organizations o Inspire people of all ages and abilities through impactful education and community engagement programs o Steward the health and creative use of our historic facilities, the original Edmonds High School campus that dates back to 1910 o Generate tourism and economic activity for the City of Edmonds and Snohomish County 2022-2023 Season o Orquesta Akokan I Wednesday, September 28th wu o Graham Nash: An Intimate Evening of Songs and Stories Tuesday, October 4th o o The Robert Cray Band I Tuesday, October 18th n o Darlingside I Thursday, October 20th Q o BODYTRAFFIC I Wednesday, October 26th N o Lyle Lovett and John Hiatt I Saturday, October 29th N o Black Opry Revue I Saturday, November 12th o Zakir Hussain & Niladri Kumar I Monday, November 14th w o Seattle International Comedy Competition I Wednesday, November 16th o Alphabet Rockers I Saturday, November 19th 111:00am z o God is a Scottish Drag Queen I Saturday, November 19th o Kalani Pe`a Christmas Show I Thursday, December 1st Q o Karla Bonoff & Livingston Taylor: Home for the Holidays Wednesday, December 21 st o Booker T: Note by Note, 60 Years of "Green Onions" & STAX Hits I Saturday, January 21st o Red Sky Performance: Miigis I Thursday, February 9th o Niyaz ft. Azam Ali I Saturday, February 1 Ith o Take Me to the River NOLA Live: Dumpstaphunk ft. Jon Cleary I Saturday, February 25th o WE SPEAK Festival feat. Shane Koyczan I Saturday, March 4th o Voctave I Thursday, March 23rd o John McCutcheon I Saturday, March 25th o Kenny Endo Contemporary Taiko I Thursday, April 20th o Magos Herrera & Brooklyn Rider: Dreamers I Thursday, May 4th Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 19 7.2.a o The Small Glories I Sunday, May 7th o Duplessy & Violins of the World I Friday, May 17th o D'DAT I Friday, May 19th o Elvin Bishop & Charlie Musselwhite I Thursday, May 25th o Will be adding more shows in spring as special engagements o Industry wide is experiencing a slower return to full audience engagement, which likely will be true for the next 2-3 years as people become more comfortable with returning and engaging in live performing arts o Part of our recovery and the community at large is coming back together and having shared experiences o Encourage visit ECA, not just to see shows they recognize, but also things they don't which often ends up being something you find amazing Rental Clients and Partners o ECA provides rental clients more than just four walls to rent, they receive incredible technical support and a full range of support in the front of house such as concessions, box office, and the ECA's 120+ volunteers AAUW, Sno-King Branch Aging Options Alicia Crank, "Bridging the Gap" Arbat Theatre Babak Kivavchi Ballyhoo Theatre Barclay Shelton Dance Cascade Symphony Orchestra Cedar Creek Memory Care Club Pro BA Comm. Christian Fellowship Cube A Sound Entertainment DeMiero Jazz Festival Edmonds Chamber of Comm. Edmonds Comm. College Edmonds H.S. Class of 1962 Edmonds In Bloom Edmonds Jazz Connection Edmonds PTA Council 7.2 Edmonds School District Everett Chorale Association EXEM Entertainment Gothard Sisters Goldspace GPA Live Halau Hula O' Moani Mokihana Hula O' Lehualani Islamic Center of Puget Sound James & Jamesy Theatre Kosmo Media La Jolla Booking Agency Lift Every Voice Legacy Lynnwood High School Miss Sydney & The Downtown Saints Mojgan Nazariyan Morning Islands LLC Nana I Ke Kumu Pono Northsound Church Northwest Event Planning Northwest Jr. Pipe Band Olympic Ballet School Olympic Ballet Theatre Operation Military Family Pacific Ohana Foundation PIMA Medical Institute Private Memorial Services Puget Sound Partnership Rick Steves' Europe Resilience Entertainment Reunion Parties Russian -American Entertainment Group Samrat Rana Seattle Radio Theatre Seattle Repertory Jazz Orch. Shoreline Young Life Sno-Isle Libraries - TEDx Sno-King Community Chorale Sno-King Music Educators Assoc. Sno-King Youth Club Steel Magic NW Stella Maris Academy Vladimir Chernov Voice Art Group WA Council for the Blind Washington School of Dance WBAC Grand Prix Windermere Real Estate Edmonds Youth America Grand Prix Education and Community Engagement o Window to the Arts (created during pandemic to bring artists to senior living facilities when they were unable to leave their rooms) o Received grant to take Windows to the Arts across Washington ■ Music therapy - Increases Communication - Improves Mood - Builds Social Connections - Example: Washington Veterans Home in Port Orchard in September o Award -Winning Dementia -Inclusive Series o Teentix o Education Matinees o Saturday Matinees Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 20 N N W N 0 T UJ m E z Q 7.2.a o Kidstock! o Artists in classrooms o Summer camps o We Speak Next phase of program development will be holistic, immersive and innovative o EXA is becoming a place where arts and wellness intersect Facility Preservation and Campus Development o Recent Project: Reconfiguration of Auditorium, New Accessible Seating Locations o Next Project: Facility Envelope Assessment o Exploring Future Possibilities: ■ ECA + Boys & Girls Club — Teen Center / Education Spaces ■ 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Mr. McIalwain introduced Lori Meagher, Director of Finance and Operations, who reviewed: N • Financial Audit Results (January 1, 2021 —December 31, 2021) N o Unmodified Opinion Issued N o Internal Control ad Compliance over Financial Reporting ■ We reported no significant deficiencies in internal controls c ■ We identified no deficiencies that we consider to be material weaknesses O ■ We noted no instances of noncompliance that were material to the financial statements of w the District o Required Communications 5 ■ We didn't identify any material misstatements during the audit ■ Uncorrected misstatements have been provided for review r • Financial Performance - Operating o Overall, the financial stability of ECA has improved, as noted in the 2021 Financial Audit L Report o FY 2021 a ■ Government grants (pandemic relief funds) and private contributions helped address operating shortfalls, maintained healthy cash position o o FY 2022 ■ Ticket revenue, rental revenue, and contributions slow to return to prior levels o ■ Expenses climbing due to inflation n ■ Remaining pandemic relief funds will help offset operating losses, but earned and Q contributed revenue must recover for long-term sustainability N o Road to Recovery N ■ Increased investments in marketing, promotion, and communications to improve ticket o sales w ■ Rental activity increasing rapidly as previous clients return to the ECA stage, and new clients engage z ■ Expansion of education and community engagement programs will result in new 0 partnerships and new funding opportunities Q ■ Restructuring Development department and improving fundraising strategies to increase contributed revenue from individuals, foundations Mr. McIalwain reviewed: • Financial Performance — Non -Operating o Sales Tax Revenues remained healthy through the pandemic, and continue to hold steady for now o Restructuring of original 2002 Bond Debt, with assistance from the City of Edmonds, helped to reduce annual debt service, helping to generate net non -operating revenue o Use of net non -operating revenue: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 21 ■ Retire outstanding loan from City of Edmonds, which was issued to help ECA meet the District's debt service obligations during the Great Recession ■ Any remaining resources placed in Board Designated Reserve Fund and invested in capital maintenance, replacement, and improvements. • Projected Repayment of Loan from the City of Edmonds Outstanding Loan Amount Projected Loan Payments Est. Interest Accrued (At LGIP rate) 2022 $1,067,000 2022 $100,000 2022 $25,000 2023 $992,000 2023 $150,000 2023 $25,000 2024 $867,000 2024 $200,000 2024 $21,000 2025 $688,000 2025 $200,000 2025 $16,000 2026 $504,000 2026 $200,000 2026 $11,000 2027 $315,000 2027 $200,000 2027 $7,000 2028 $122,000 2028 $124,00 2028 $2,000 Total $1,174,000 Total $107,000 Ms. Meagher reviewed: • Rebuilding and Restructuring o Changes in the labor market have impacted ECA, there has been tremendous transition industry -wide, and labor costs are increasing o In response, ECA is modifying its organizational structure in some instances and hiring now to fill critical gaps in key departments o The outlook for staff development is extremely positive, however, as morale continues to improve and new professional development systems such as Catalytic Coaching are implemented o New benchmarking tool has also been deployed to ensure ECA's compensation model matches appropriately to the marketplace to assist with staff retention EPFD Board President Liaw relayed in late summer Mr. McIalwain, the EPFD's founding executive director, announced he will be leaving the Pacific Northwest and the ECA in about a year. The ° EPFD/ECA is searching for the next leader of the ECA. This is a milestone and presents an opportunity, > so the EPFD/ECA is heartbroken and excited for the next phase. An RFP was put out yesterday for an ° n executive search firm. A leadership transition team was formed, with members of the EPFD Board, the Q ECA Board, and staff. When the process reaches the point of interviewing candidates, they looking forward to engaging the community in the process as there are a number of key stakeholders who have a cm vested interest in the next leader of the ECA. She thanked the council for the opportunity to make a o presentation and encouraged the council, as they head into their budget season, to continue to think of the w ECA and their prior support of their operations. c m Councilmember Tibbott said he is consistently and constantly amazed at the creative ways the ECA z dreams up to serve and express the arts in the community and now in other areas. He was very impressed 2 with what the ECA has done and continues to do. Q Councilmember Paine thanked the EPFD/ECA for all they do for the community; the ECA is an anchor and generator of fun and good things for Edmonds. She appreciated their constant, thoughtful and intentional inclusive programming for all members of the community including people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, memory care, veterans, etc. If that could be bottled and if others in the community would to commit to it, the world would be much nicer. She referred to the comment about the delay in audience return and asked what the issues were with that and how the return to historic levels could be fostered. Mr. Mclalwain explained shows by recognizable artists are selling out with no problem; those with concerns are wearing masks which the ECA supports. Shows by less known artists, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 22 7.2.a ones people are less likely to take a chance on, are not selling as well due in part to residual pandemic concerns. He summarized people are willing to put themselves at risk for artists they recognize, but not as much for artist they do not recognize, something that is true for most performing arts centers. He assured the ECA's HVAC system is new, installed in 2006, the filtering system is great, there are additional filters in the lobby and theater, and masks are encouraged/supported. If that is holding people back from attending a show, he assured it is safe to come to their facility. Councilmember Paine encouraged the public to go enjoy a show. Councilmember Buckshnis was shocked Mr. McIalwain was leaving and offered him a recommendation if he needed one. She recognized the amazing amount of work that has gone into the facility, expressing her pleasure with the financials and finding a replacement for Matt. She recalled the ECA opened during the great recession and it has been a long, strange and winding road. She has been a thorn in their sides some of the time but is happy with the current financials and audits. Councilmember Nand shared a personal anecdote, she was a college intern from Edmonds Community College at the ECA in 2007 where she worked on the program for the integral season. She went on to write for the Seattle Weekly Arts and Entertainment calendar based on writing for Triton Review at the college. She asked him to describe the role the ECA has in creating jobs for young people interested in pursuing a career in arts and entertainment and why that is unique in south Snohomish County versus downtown Seattle and trendier locales like Capitol Hill. Mr. McIalwain said the ECA's intern program specific to production — sound, lights and backstage work — has developed people who have become part of the team including one who was recently promoted to full time on the backstage crew. When there has been an opportunity, they have also had interns work on administration and learning the business side of operating a theater. The space that is imagined as a teen center in partnership with the Boys & Girls Club will have a lot of technology capabilities and an opportunity to learn at the ground level, and is right next door to a fully functioning theater where kids can apply that knowledge and join the ECA in supporting touring artists. There is no end to the possibilities in how the ECA can serve the community. Councilmember Chen expressed his appreciation for the wonderful work that has been done by the ECA and the great team and their innovative ideas for serving community. In looking at the financials and the approximately $1 million outstanding loan to the City, he was not concerned as he was certain the team could handle it. He referred to the uncorrected misstatements in the audit, noting it is typical for audit to uncover minor issues. He congratulated the EPFD on the unqualified opinion from the state auditor, finding that a great success. N Councilmember Chen continued, Edmonds is a special city, the physical location in downtown Edmonds N is second to none, but there is also tremendous potential for a multicultural facility in the Highway 99 area. He asked if any thought had been given to extending programs on Highway 99 such as establishing w a multicultural center. Mr. McIalwain answered there has not yet been any clear commitment or specific plan, but that conversation has happened a lot. In addition, consideration is given to how make the ECA E campus more accessible to everyone in community such as transportation and engagement. The conversation includes what the ECA is bringing to the uptown community as well as how to make it easier for the people who live uptown to come to ECA for the theater experience. The board is about Q ready to engage in a strategic process, but are working on the timing, whether to have it happen while he is still the executive director or after he departs. EPFD Board President Liaw recalled the Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Accessibility (IDEA) committee was discussing ways to increase the level of partnership with multicultural organizations around the community such as Windows for the Arts which brings programming to other locations. That is currently done via partnerships with the school district where artists visit elementary schools to do performances and workshops which is a tremendous opportunity, especially for Title 1 schools. The more opportunities there are for partnerships and bringing programming into the community, the better the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 23 ECA can serve the community. Councilmember Chen thanked the EPFD/ECA for the amazing work they do and wished luck to Mr. McIalwain in his next chapter. 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO ADD A NEW CATEGORY AFTER ITEM 8, TO ADD FROM THE SPECIAL MEETING, PRESENTATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN/RIGHT OF WAY PHASES OF HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 4. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO MOVE THAT TO ITEM 10.1 AND RENUMBER THE REMAINING ITEMS TO KEEP THE PUBLIC WORKS ITEMS TOGETHER. Council President Olson relayed her impression that this would not be a very lengthy item. Unless staff preferred to keep the public works items together, she preferred not to approve the amendment and have that item earlier in the meeting. She suggested staff weigh in whether they preferred to have that item later in the meeting. Mayor Nelson assumed they would prefer to have it earlier on the agenda. UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, PAINE AND NAND VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING NO. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson described procedures for in -person audience comments. Mary Kay Sneeringer, Edmonds, retired business owner, spoke about the Edmonds Downtown > Alliance. She was one of the founding members when she owned the Edmonds Bookshop and worked ° n very hard to create the BID in downtown Edmonds. Business owners put their reputations on the line and Q followed all the required procedures, and gathered information from other areas that had formed BIDs. `- She encouraged the council to ask her, Pam Stellar and others any questions they have about how the BID C4 was created. The BID created a tight and supportive group of businesses, a strength for downtown. She o hoped the council would continue to support the Edmonds Downtown Alliance who does great work with w a minimal budget. If the BID hadn't been formed, she was certain there would be interest in forming one because it was needed and aids all the businesses in downtown Edmonds. She encouraged other business E districts such as Westgate, Highway 99, Five Corners to form BIDs to strengthen the business community z in their neighborhoods. Q Pam Steller, Edmonds, owner of Walnut Street Coffee which celebrated its 16t' anniversary this summer, commented prior to opening her shop, she spent a decade in the corporate sector in HR and marketing. She spoke in support of the BID, Edmonds Downtown Alliance, that she worked with Ms. Sneeringer to create over a decade ago. She was on the committee of volunteers who worked to establish it and has severed several terms as a board member and recently served on the delinquency taskforce with city staff and councilmembers to evaluate Ed!'s delinquencies. She was incredible proud of the work Ed! has done and continues to do including doing an incredibly through job of reaching out to their constituents through the years, meeting with a number of people the council has heard from recently, encouraging dialogue, and listening to criticism. That has made Ed! a better organization but headway has not been made with a handful of individuals. She encouraged the council to revisit the focus on the value Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 24 7.2.a of the BID. There has been an unspoken rule that there has to be absolute agreement among Ed! members for the organization to be considered valid; she questioned whether that was a reasonable test for any organization. Ed! has thrived on differing opinions and good discussion and has an incredibly effective board that does not just rubberstamp projects. Each board member contributed assessments and has skin in the game and wants to ensure Ed!'s budget is well thought out and well executed. Ms. Steller continued, members are welcome and encouraged to attend Ed!'s monthly meetings and contribute their voice, ideas, and feedback; that is the power of a BID, it is member driven. According to the October assessment data, of the BID's 395 members, 93% are current on their assessments; if the 10 businesses that make up the bulk of the delinquents and have refused to pay for years are removed, that percentage increases to over 95%. It has been almost a decade since she and a few colleagues introduced the concept of the BID to the council and explain the years of work they had put in to get to that point. She has lost track of the hours volunteered with the aim of making Edmonds vibrant and attractive, a great place to live, work and play and she assured she never approached this volunteer work with N anything but good intentions and complete transparency. Ultimately she hoped tonight's focus can be on N celebrating the amazing accomplishments and success of Ed! that will be presented by Kimberly Koenig N and Carrie Hulbert, and celebrate the amazing amount of volunteer time, business acumen and consciousness that has been shown year after year. She could not imagine a more dedicated and talented c group and felt incredibly lucky to have been able to work alongside them. O Jay Grant, Edmonds, referred to the budget and said citizens deserve to receive additional information. Traditionally the mayor sends out their proposed budget, but unless there is a consensus by the council, c councilmembers' voices are not heard with regard to various aspects of the budget. He suggested something similar to the voters pamphlet so citizens understand the budget as well as commentary from councilmembers or the council president on items they like or disagree with. Personally, he liked what was being done with regard to public safety, but was opposed to an in-house prosecutor. The mayor presents their budget, but the council holds the purse strings. He hoped the council would consider doing something different to better educate the public as not everyone reads the budget or watches the mayor a give his annual statement. 0 Ken Reidy, Edmonds, said Ordinance 3909, effective January 25, 2013, is the ordinance that established the Edmonds Downtown BID. The ordinance contains the following whereas clause, whereas the owners L and operators of businesses located within the area and representing approximately 60% or more of the n assessments levied by this ordinance signed a petition in support of establishing an Edmonds Downtown Q BID. He questioned why the word approximately was in an Edmonds ordinance that can only be adopted N after a petition has been submitted by the operators responsible for 60% of the assessments of businesses N and multifamily residential and mixed use projects within the area. He suggested considering what the T City does to verify that a petition meets a legal standard. The November 10, 2014 city council minutes w include the following: City Attorney Jeff Taraday explained the BID process can start either with a petition or resolution. While there was a substantial effort put into collecting signatures for a petition, it E was realized in the course of review of those signatures that it would not meet the legal standard for a petition and it was recommended the process be initiated by resolution which the council did with Resolution 1284. Somehow this ability to initiate the BID process morphed into city council also Q establishing the BID without a petition that met the legal standard for a petition. He hoped the 2022 city council will properly address what took place in 2013 under Ordinance 3909. The BID is a great organization, but it needed to be established legally so it would be appropriate to go back and do it right. Mr. Reidy asked the council to investigate how RCW 35.94.040 applied to the release of stormwater facilities located on property at 22901 Edmonds Way. The City simply released ownership of public stormwater facilities under Ordinance 4061. He questioned whether this action was allowed under state law RCW 35.94.040. Next, he explained the City's own code ECDC 20.70.060.G states an appraisal is not required if a utility easement only is proposed to be vacated. He questioned why the code would state Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 25 this if a utility easement is not something that can be vacated. Utility easements are vacated, not released. He encouraged the city council to form a citizen taskforce to review the historical conduct of city attorneys and recommend how the city should obtain and manage legal advice. He requested the council also allow a citizen taskforce to play a role in the update of Chapter 2.05 ECDC. Mayor Nelson described procedures for virtual audience comments. Natalie Seitz, Edmonds, thanked the council for supporting the development of a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for the SR-99 planned action. She also thanked staff and council for their efforts and asked that they continue to support the SEIS, a community led scoring process and appropriate funding in the upcoming budget process. The triggers to inform a SEIS have been met and the SEIS is the ideal process by which the City can bring trust with the community. The 6-month interim emergency ordinance is not a building moratorium. A SEIS is urgently needed to ensure the community has the opportunity to provide input and object to development causing harmful impacts to traffic, parks, access to clean and healthy environment and displacement, among many others. This notice and standing is currently circumvented by leaving the existing final EIS in place. Ms. Seitz continued, she found the October 20t1i presentation on the community renewal plan difficult and although she does not consider herself an overly emotional person, she cannot properly express the flood of emotion she felt seeing the presentation in black and white, the hazards to the community that she has seen, heard and felt since moving here and the countless times she has identified them during public comments to council and to City staff. The SR-99 corridor is the undeniable economic engine for Edmonds which means the hazards identified in this community are not a reflection of the beauty, sprit, and resiliency of this area and community, but rather the scarlet letter of the City's appropriation and redistribution of wealth. These issues will take time but they are not insurmountable. It took years to get here and she encouraged council to prioritize the investment of local tax dollars necessary to address the most pressing hazards, public health issues and resource disparities faced by Edmonds residents in this year's budget. She congratulated Councilmember Nand on her appointment. Theresa Hollis, Edmonds, spoke regarding the recently approved SEIS for the Highway 99 subareas — plan, commenting in her perspective there was a bit of a rush for this work effort as new building permits are evaluated against the code in place when the building permit application is submitted. The Terrace L Place project, a very large apartment building in her neighborhood, is currently in the design review n n phase. It has been in design review since June and she expected that process would be completed as soon Q as year end and definitely by next spring. She hoped the SEIS has been developed, debated and approved N before the Terrace Place developer submits their permit so this very large development is evaluated N against the revised building codes. Next, she thanked Councilmember Buckshnis for hosting an open house in their neighborhood last night. There was rich discussion and she appreciated the time w Councilmember Buckshnis took to set up the meeting and invited her to host another open house in the Gateway neighborhood in 6-8 months. E z Sheila Clooney, owner of Anchor Chic in downtown Edmonds, expressed her support for the Edmonds Q BID, aka Ed!. She has a lot of experience with BIDS, their programs and collecting late assessments during her long tenure working for the City of Kirkland and she offered to speak to councilmembers interested in her experience. When she opened her business in Edmonds, she was skeptical of the BID and figured she would pay the fees and plug her nose. No one was more surprised than she when she saw the work that was being accomplished by Ed!. She has continued to be impressed by the level of professionalism and the practical offerings that attract people to the downtown. She understood there were loud voices calling for the elimination of the BID, but she appreciated the work that Ed! volunteers do to keep the downtown a high quality business district which contributes to building a stronger community and certainly economic development. She echoed previous speakers suggestion that instead of talking about elimination, instead talk about duplication in some other business areas, specifically on Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 26 7.2.a Highway 99. She would support a bridge between the two organizations to see how this well -run program could be expanded. Judi Gladstone, Edmonds, a resident in the south end of the Highway 99 corridor, said the last two meetings have had topics of significant importance to their community and while there is nothing related to their neighborhood tonight, she offered follow-up questions from the council's discussion at the last meeting. She expressed appreciation for the council's responsiveness to community concerns; the approval of an SEIS for the Highway 99 subarea action plan FEIS in addition to the earlier approval of an emergency ordinance related to stepbacks which are instrumental in addressing their concerns. She understood the imperfection of the EIS process as Director McLaughlin pointed out, but it is an authoritative public process that can provide for appropriate mitigations and resource commitments, virtually the only way to ensure the community's concerns can apply to what is happening on the ground right now, not in a few years when it will be too late. Ms. Gladstone continued, relaying she knew all too well from her own professional work how hard it was to get community members to engage in long range planning efforts so she wasn't surprised that the neighborhood's concerns emerged despite staff s award winning outreach efforts at the time the action plan was developed. Since the council met last, they heard from Director McLaughlin about meeting with the neighbors to discuss actions that could be taken to address neighborhood concerns. It is clear she and her staff have an interest in serving underinvested and underrepresented neighborhoods like their area. While the discussion may not address all the concerns, they welcome her initiative and the professional expertise she brings to the discussions. Traffic, pedestrian safety, parks, and displacement will not be easily solved for their area when so little has been done over the years, but in recent weeks, she has gained optimism that the City is moving in the right direction with the promising efforts by City staff and the council's actions. She thanked the council for stepping up for their community. 7. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS 2. OUTSIDE BOARDS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. N W N O Councilmember Buckshnis requested Item 8.3, Approval of Council Special Minutes of October 18, w 2022, be removed from the Consent Agenda. m Council President Olson requested Item 8.4, Approval of Council Regular Meeting Minutes of October z 18, 2022, be removed from the Consent Agenda for modification, and that Item 8.9, Employee Expenses, cc Volunteer Recognition, And Reimbursements Policy, be removed Q MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL PSPHSP COMMITTEE MINUTES OF OCTOBER 14, 2022 2. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 17, 2022 5. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE PAYMENTS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 27 7.2.a 6. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS 7. COMPASS HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 8. APPROVAL OF DRIFTWOOD PLAYERS LEASE AT WADE JAMES THEATER CONTRACT ADDENDUM 1 ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT 3. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 2022 Councilmember Buckshnis said her correction was actually to Item 8.4, Regular Meeting of October 18, 2022. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE COUNCIL SPECIAL MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 2022 4. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 2022 Councilmember Buckshnis requested the statement in the minutes, "The Lake Ballinger Forum, which consists of Mountlake Terrace, Shoreline and Edmonds" be amended to add Lake Forest Park. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT AS STATED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Olson referred to her email sent to staff and council and requested the following change on page 8: change "this code" to "a code." COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT AS STATED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Council President Olson requested the following change in the third line of the last paragraph on page 25: add (on 84t1i) after "constructed" as the context in the minutes was unclear. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT AS STATED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 18, 2022 REGULAR MEETING AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. EMPLOYEE EXPENSES, VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION, AND REIMBURSEMENTS POLICY Council President Olson explained she requested this item be removed from the consent agenda and brought back next week because there were two places the alternate approval by the council body was to apply and it was only changed in one of the two places. Additionally number formatting was to be added to make it easier to reference this portion of the code. This is not time critical and Director Turley was fine with putting approval of the policy on consent next week with those changes. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO BRING THIS ITEM BACK ON NEXT WEEK'S CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. PUBLIC HEARING Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 28 N N W N O T W m E z Q 7.2.a 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON BD2 DESIGNATED STREET FRONT CODE AMENDMENT (AMD2022-0003) Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin explained this item is to revisit and hold a public hearing on the BD2 zone and particularly the extension of the designated street front (DSF) in the BD zone areas. To set the context for the discussion, she recognized many people talked about Highway 99 and the distribution of housing last week and she wanted to elevate that as part of tonight's discussion. This issue arose initially due to a concern with a multifamily building proposed at 6' & Main. As a result, staff developed interim design standards to address the concern with aesthetics and then council expressed interest in pursuing a mixed use designation which required an extension of the DSF, thereby eliminating the opportunity for multifamily in that location. Staff s recommendation continues to be affording the most flexibility and to be resilient to market changes, but recognizing the need and interest to review and consider mixed use properties in appropriate zones. Staff will present recommended changes to the DSF map. Senior Planner Mike Clugston explained the interim standards the council adopted in the spring expire December 1 and it is time to adopt permanent standards so there is not a time where the interim standards have expired and there were no permanent standards. He reviewed: • Existing DSF map in the code adopted over ten years ago after many meetings and many hours of study: Y976t�f os4w.M Rwwr F.oae Tar 6D Sa1n a— E]Pvgnrs[Pd S-1 F— uM1P9 Y Tr 8l OAi EY Sr BEk ' a r m er > a L eeu ar 893 4 wF.F ar C AICERBr � � m t 91lP KPeR S � o s tlP3 Ord,3865 Dec: 2cia • Meeting objectives O Review updated BD use table and permanent BS2 DSF line O Take public testimony O Discuss and decide on BD table and extent of BD2 DSF line. • BD Use Table (16.43.020) O Clarify ambiguities O Fill in blanks in uses created by Ord. 3955 O Reference ground floor in ECDC 16.43.030.B for locational requirements • Designated Street Front o Map on left is interim map council adopted via the interim standards in June 2022. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 12 Packet Pg. 29 N N W N O T W C d E t V Q 7.2.a o Map on the right is recommendation from planning board and EDC to extend the blue line to all BD2 parcels to be more consistent with the comprehensive plan. ■ Commercial on all ground floors to meet existing code standards and cannot have multifamily only buildings adjacent to the extended map areas Ossignatetl 5[mel Fronl -- PAs —d St —IF —t oe Exhi • E,I _ , 9r - ALEY Sr E . , Mr. Clugston explained since the last council meeting, staff went for a walkabout to ground truth what the full extension would mean relative to what is there today and determine whether a full extension of the BD2 is the appropriate way to proceed. • Alternative Extension o Red lines are areas that are proposed to be eliminated ■ Don't extend around corners where DSF already exists (red) ■ Focus on commercial rather than side streets (red) o Highlights based on council feedback (yellow) t uesignam �rrem rram EAI EY P/ILET ST � BD2 s, TELL � 4"m. 80it BPt B°2 -l EAYTMAPLE ,`.rALAI EN STALDER ST Staff MLnJr sT �T�rra,Lnur Permanent —MI ➢SF Q R.., • Staff recommendation o Approve updated BD use table o Discuss and decide on extent of permanent BD2 SDF map Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 13 Packet Pg. 30 N N W N T W V Wr Q 7.2.a o Direct staff to prepare an ordinance for November 15 consent agenda • Note: If the DSF line isn't fully extended to all BD2 parcels, multifamily -only buildings will be possible where the DSF does not touch. Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, reiterated his previous statements that this has been one of the most confusing legislative processes he has ever witnessed. There have been moratoriums extended without a public hearing, public hearings during which the council did not discuss findings of fact they wanted to adopt to support their previous action, etc. Adding to the confusion is something found on page 331 of tonight's packet, a document titled "Edmonds Downtown Business Zone BD2 Zoning Memorandum" dated May 19, 2022, a document that includes the following comment about design standards adopted in 2013, "Development in the BD2 zone must be consistent with the design standards outlined in ECDC Chapter 22.43. The design standards provide guidance on the architectural form, ground level details, window transparency, signage and other street level pedestrian oriented designs. The design regulations do not provide any regulations that are relevant to this size, scale or use of the structure and have not been summarized for the memorandum." He did not understand how codified design standards would not be relevant. He pointed out both 605 Main and 611 Main are located within the boundaries of the BID. He provided a copy of the map from Ordinance 3909 for each councilmember, commenting that may be another matter for council to consider. Jack Malek, Shoreline, realtor representing Karen Wiggins, Sound View Plaza on the corner of James & 2nd, observed the yellow on the map at James & 2nd would suggest council comments that it not be included in the DSF which he concurred with. He said that building is compliant with BD2 as it has ground level commercial, in fact the only ground level commercial with a loading dock. That would allow that property to have commercial on the ground level and residential on the upper two levels. Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, was glad for the proposed change at 2nd & James. She was very familiar with that property as well as Karen Wiggins' involvement in the City for many years. Greg Brewer, Edmonds, commented he did not expect to see the 3-color and multi -hash marks on the map; his comments may have been different if he had. He expressed concern with the erosion of business o space in BD2. Recent tweaks to the permitted use table by City planners have left that portion of BD2 n outside the DSF vulnerable to 100% residential buildings. These BD2 areas were set aside long ago when Q City planners sought to protect the small, fragile downtown core. The council recently extended the DSF N to protect more of the BD2. He requested the council consider protecting all of BD2, only a handful of W N building lots, many with existing businesses that the City needs. Other lots recently purchased for T development have eliminated existing buildings in the downtown core, businesses that added diversity to w the downtown, the beginning of an erosion of business space. The council should be alarmed and move to protect what remains. E z Mr. Brewer continued, with the swelling population of Edmonds and the surrounding area, these spaces Q will be highly sought after by future service providers. Many businesses seek to move to Edmonds to leave the chaos of the big city; if there is space available, they will come. If part of the business zone is turned over to 100% residential, it is gone forever. The proposed residential buildings have a double -edge sword for new and existing business owners; by allowing 100% residential apartment buildings in the BD2, developers are able to build with less parking than if they built in a multifamily zone. This will put 24 more cars per development onto the street for parking, Not only will would-be business owners have less space to choose from, but would-be clients will also have much less ability to park and frequent the businesses. The council needs to take a hard look at what they want the downtown core to look like in the future, whether it is a vibrant downtown core with business diversity and some parking for patrons, or to pack the core with density, drive out small businesses and have minimal parking for patrons. Once that Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 14 Packet Pg. 31 7.2.a decision is make, there is no turning back. He urged the council to fight to protect businesses in the BD2 zone. Hearing no further public testimony, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing. Councilmember Tibbott expressed appreciation for the finetuning staff has done and bringing back a very helpful diagram for the council to consider. He referred to 3rd and Dayton and especially the segment just south, and asked if the buildings face Dayton or 3rd. He assumed since it was crossed off that they face Dayton. Mr. Clugston did not know which direction they face, but if the buildings were demolished and replaced, the intent would be for them to face Dayton. Councilmember Tibbott expressed appreciation for the map clearly identifying where commercial portions of buildings face the main pedestrian streets. He asked the impact of having the buildings face the main pedestrian streets; for example at 6' & Main, the commercial front would be on Main versus on 6'. He asked what urban design or impact that had for people utilizing the businesses. Mr. Clugston said the urban design concept is for commercial spaces to face the most commercial and pedestrian streets such as 5t'', Main Dayton, 3' and 4t'', focusing buildings on those streets, and less on the side streets. Councilmember Tibbott said in his opinion, that provides more robust engagement for pedestrian which was part of the reason for the proposal to extend the DSF in those areas. Those corners move people to the next street front. He liked the proposed map and was supportive of the changes staff has recommended. Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for the adjustments to the map. He asked if a planning board member was present to describe their recommendation or could staff summarize. Mr. Clugston said he did not want to speak for the planning board and did not have their minutes in front of him so his summary should be taken with a grain of salt. The planning board's intent was to "save the dirt" which he thought meant since we are not sure what we want to do and want take a more holistic look at this area during the comprehensive plan process, to apply the DSF to all BD2 parcels now as the most conservative approach. Councilmember Chen asked for clarification, if the red line was where the DSF was recommended not to 0 be extended in the BD2 zone. He asked what the yellow highlight and the hatched areas meant. Mr. n n Clugston answered the red areas were eliminations, the yellow were also eliminations or questions for Q further discussion. There are overlaps in some and others that were close but did not overlap such as east N on Dayton and Main, the planning board would have extended it up further and on Durbin as well. After N staff s walkabout, it was fairly apparent that Durbin did not make sense since it is next to the library parking lot. Council provided input on extending the DSF up Dayton and Main. w Councilmember Chen summarized the red and yellow would be removed from BD2 so the extension E would be very limited compared to the original map. Clugston agreed, commenting the one main place where the DSF would still be located is along 3' north of Bell Street, but not past Edmonds or further cc along 3rd, Daly or Edmonds in that area. Q Councilmember Paine expressed her surprise at the new map. She referred to her email about where the DSF should be located. She went on a walk with a planning board member; she is very familiar with the property at 2nd & James and has been in the building several times. There is a nice use of mixes at that intersection including multifamily, mixed use and commercial. She referred to a public comment expressing concern with parking, advising there is adequate parking in that area for that building. She referred to the highlighted area on the map that crossed 6t' Avenue between Main Street and Dayton, relaying she did not propose that and it may have come from another councilmember. She felt it would be Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 15 Packet Pg. 32 7.2.a appropriate to extend the DSF in that location but respected that staff thinks it could be focused elsewhere. Councilmember Paine asked if the DSF will be included in the comprehensive plan update. Ms. McLaughlin answered that was the reason for staffs hesitancy to jump into this without a robust framework and criteria in which to review it. The interest is to do a comprehensive review of the downtown and all neighborhood districts. With regard to parking, she said residential requires more onsite parking. The BD2 zone allows mixed use, residential or commercial. Councilmember Nand thanked staff for their nuanced revisions. Before she joined the council, she heard comments from affected land owners in the BD2 zone. The revisions staff is recommending are sensitive to the affected property owners, but also appear to be sensitive to the general community who feel a lot of ownership in the look, feel and charm of downtown Edmonds, which is a very walkable area. Several emails she received expressed concern that the historic downtown area will be negatively impacted by these zoning changes. She noted the community isn't always as invested as the affected land owners, the planning board and staff who look at this issues day after day. She asked staff to discuss the proposed revised boundaries and how they will affect what is generally considered to be Edmonds' downtown historic business district. Mr. Clugston explained when the BD zones were adopted in 2006, there were five flavors, BD1 is the primary commercial area surrounding the fountain. Moving away from the fountain where there are mix of uses was primarily 13132, 13135 is the arts corridor and someday may be redeveloped to that, BD4 on the western end is more residential and adjacent to other residential areas, and BD3 is still envisioned as more art -oriented and drive throughs are allowed. The primary commercial space is BD with more uses mixed in as one moves away from the fountain. Councilmember Teitzel said he was uneasy about disregarding the planning board's recommendations as the planning board consists of bright, dedicated and capable people. Having said that, he referred to the highlighted area on James Street and 2nd Avenue that transition from 3' to the end of the road and extend the BD2 down 2nd to James Street, observing that wraps BD2 around the corner at 2' and James which would allow that property owner to decide which side of the building they would designate as the street front and allow commercial on the ground floor if the frontage was defined as James Street and two floors of residential above. He asked if that was correct. In response to Councilmember Teitzel's comment about the planning board's recommendation, Ms. n McLaughlin explained staff came to council after the planning board's recommendation and council Q directed staff to reconsider the full extent of the DSF at this meeting. That is why staff did a walkabout N and why council provided additional comment. The planning board's recommendation still stands; staff N was taking direction from council at the last meeting. T W With regard to the site on 2nd & James, Mr. Clugston agreed with Councilmember Teitzel, the ground floor entrance could be on either of those streets with residential above. Councilmember Teitzel asked if E there was a downside to other property owners of designating that area of James & 2nd. Mr. Clugston answered it goes back to where you want the buildings to face, what is the commercial street and what is cc the pedestrian street. There is an existing building on that corner site; if they demolished it and rebuilt with commercial, it would face 2nd Avenue. James is more of a side street than a primary street and 2nd Avenue already has a DSF and there are commercial uses and a mix of uses on that street. With regard to James Street, Ms. McLaughlin said it's important to look at the broader view. The waterfront vision as part of the comprehensive plan will feed into James Street. When she visited that site, she thought about the connection to the waterfront and how it could open up to pedestrian and ferry traffic. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 16 Packet Pg. 33 7.2.a Councilmember Buckshnis said she sent Councilmember Nand Ordinance 3918 which is always left out of these discussions. She did not recall nor did she see in the minutes where council gave staff direction to go out and look at these highlighted areas and she was never asked to go on a walkabout. She was uncomfortable with the proposed map which differs from the planning board and EDC's recommendation. Both those groups consist of smart volunteers who understand the history of downtown and the BD zones. She recommended removing all the red lines as that is not something the council needs to consider. She pointed out the comprehensive plan does not includes zoning, it is vision. If a master plan is included in the comprehensive plan, it can include zoning. The existing comprehensive plan has master plans for Highway 99, the Marsh and Westgate that address zoning. Staff keeps saying this will be addressed in the comprehensive plan, but the comprehensive plan is a vision and zoning is done via separate master plans. Ms. McLaughlin clarified the comprehensive plan comes with a vision as well as the very important role of designating land use, densities and types of development. What the council is discussing tonight is land use. The comprehensive plan needs to be consistent with the zoning code so in very short order after the comprehensive plan is adopted, zoning is adopted to be consistent with the comprehensive plan to avoid the being out of compliance with the GMA. With regard to the walkabout, that done with internal staff as directed by council and it was her understanding that some councilmembers went on their own walkabouts. Councilmember Buckshnis reiterated the comprehensive plan is a vision, and the City has always complied with GMA. Many different items have been docketed to change the comprehensive plan so they do not have to be done swiftly. Zoning is a component of the comprehensive plan but it is not in the comprehensive plan. Zoning is permanent, which is why she was not comfortable with the change proposed to the planning board and EDC's recommendation. She preferred to remove the red lines because she believed the BD2 should stay as is because issues such as traffic, sewer, stormwater, pedestrian safety, and adding residential to the downtown core have not been considered. Ms. McLaughlin clarified the existing land use has gone through an environmental process that already assumed the level of density that is allowed at buildout per the land use and the zoning code. All of the issues Councilmember Buckshnis mentioned such as stormwater, traffic, pedestrian, safety, were analyzed when the land use changes went into effect under existing zoning. Any changes would require a subsequent EIS as part of the comprehensive plan update. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the City just learned the nitrogen levels at the WWTP are at N capacity so new environmental standards have not been addressed with regard to stormwater and sewer. N Changing the BD2 from mixed commercial to mixed residential will add bodies to the downtown area. T She referred to a $500,000 claim for a broken stormwater or sewer pipe in a building due to aging w infrastructure in the downtown area. She wanted to ensure there was an understanding of the unintended consequences of removing all the red and yellow lines in the BD2. The master plan was done in 2013. E z Ms. McLaughlin said Councilmember Buckshnis could streamline her comments by saying she wanted to Q prohibit multifamily buildings completely and eliminate them from the use table. Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not want to streamline her comments because she is open minded. She recently held three town hall meetings and people are very upset about what is happening to the downtown area including that there is suddenly residential in the BD2 mixed commercial. She was not in favor of what has been done and suggested the council vote on removing the red lines and discuss the yellow highlighted lines. Council President Olson asked staff to email councilmembers the slide that was displayed tonight with the new proposed map. She has a great appreciation for the planning board, the EDC and the residents who have all expressed a desire to protect the commercial space in the downtown core. Her leanings are the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 34 7.2.a same, but at the same time, when boots are put on the ground, she has the same experience. Using 2nd & James as an example, it seemed like an appropriate place for a DSF. She referred to Mr. Clugston's comment that the property owner could choose whatever DSF they wanted because it is at the corner. She asked if that property would not be affected regardless of what was decided, even if everything stayed BD2. Mr. Clugston explained if the DSF street front was extended to James & 2nd, if the building on the corner redeveloped, a primary entry location would need to be identified and it could on either 2nd or on James or on the corner. The entry standards would apply to whichever entry they chose. There are also other standards that apply for a new building on the corner where there are two DSFs such as 75% of the windows on the ground floor facing the DSF have to be transparent. He commented that would make sense on Main Street or 5' to create an inviting space from outside to inside. The requirement for 75% transparency on the ground floor may not make as much sense further away from BD L He summarized that was an example of the standards that would apply if the DSF is extended. Council President Olson said she also leans toward protecting commercial space, but has seen places where it did not feel super appropriate and that was one of the examples. She wanted to walk the proposed map and suggested planning board and/or EDC members may want to join her on a walk to vet the proposals in the coming week. She suggested council provide direction to staff regarding the ordinance at next week's meeting instead of tonight and therefore she opposed taking any action tonight. Councilmember Nand observed the council was just provided this map today. She asked if it had been provided to the planning board for feedback. Mr. Clugston answered no, and it wouldn't in this case. This item is to the point in the decision process where there was an interim ordinance and permanent ordinance and it is up to the council to decide where the DSF will be for the next couple years while the City works on the comprehensive plan update. 10. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. PRESENTATION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN/RIGHT OF WAY PHASES OF HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 4 Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss commented this is very similar to Stage 3. He reviewed: c • Photograph of existing condition south of 220t1i, looking northbound Q n • Project Description Q o Segment along Highway 99 from 224t' St SW to 220th St SW N o Capacity improvement with additional NB/SB left turn lane and WB right turn lane Highway C4 99 @ 220th St SW cm o Planter strip on both sides of the street w o Lighting enhancements o New sidewalk on both sides of street E o Better stormwater management o Targeted utility replacements (water/sewer o Potential undergrounding of overhead utilities Q o Softscape treatments • Project benefits o Economic vitality/pedestrian safety/capacity improvements • Proposed roadway segment Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 18 Packet Pg. 35 7.2.a Scope of work (as part of professional services agreement) o Survey o Geotechnical report o Environmental documentation o Public outreach o Utility coordination 0 30% 60% 90%, 95%, 100% and final PS&E (including design of water/sewer/stormwater and potential conversion of underground utility lines o Bid support o Start of ROW phase for ROW acquisition and temporary construction easements (28 parcels) Funding sources o Total design phase ($4.5 million) ■ Secured STP federal funds ■ State appropriations - Connecting Washington ■ Local Funds - Traffic Impact Fees - REET - Utility Fund (Fund 421 & 423) ■ Total SCJ Design Contract o ROW phase ■ STP federal funds ■ Local Funds - REET - Traffic Impact Fee o Start of ROW SCJ contract amount Preliminary total project cost o Design $4.5 M o Right-of-way $5.6 M o Construction $32.5 M o Total project cost $42.6 M Minor revisions to agreement 1. All - minor edits to the contract totals $1,580,000 $1,632,000 $665,000 (in 2025 and 2026) $504,000 (in 2026) $120,000 $3.72 million $2,587,000 (to be secured in late 2022) $765,000 (in 2025/2026) $2,248,000 (2024-2026) $165,000 2. All - added headers to all exhibits 3. All - added the contract # and page X of Y to all pages of the contracts 4. Exhibit A: Scope of work - onsite treatment and detention clarification 5. Exhibit A: Scope of work - project description clarification/scope reorganization 6. Exhibit B: SBE/DBE targets and first page of contract - corrected SBE/DBE targets and contract totals 7. Exhibit B: SBE/DBE targets - removed 2°a copy of Exhibit B 8. Exhibit D-1: Overall fee - fee reorganization to match the scope reorganization 9. Exhibit D-1: Overall fee - minor adjustments to the level of estimate for SCJ 10. Exhibit D-1: renumbered all phase in Stage 4 (phases 51-78) so they do not match with Stage 3 (Phases 1-28) 11. Exhibit E-1: Fee for 1 Alliance - added summary Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 19 Packet Pg. 36 N N W N O w m E z Q 7.2.a Staff recommendation o Add revised agreement to Consent Agenda for November 1, 2022 Council meeting. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO MOVE THIS TO THE CONSENT AGENDA NEXT WEEK WITHOUT ANY CHANGES. Council President Olson suggested removing the statement in the motion "without any changes" because the revised agreement is what will be on the consent agenda. City Engineer Rob English advised the revised agreements for both Stage 3 and Stage 4 would be on Consent Agenda for November 1 2022. Mayor Nelson asked if that what Councilmember Paine intended. Councilmember Paine said her intent was to move the amended agreement in the packet to the consent agenda. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO AMEND TO HAVE THE UNDERGROUNDING COME BACK TO COUNCIL TO REVIEW THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS. Councilmember Teitzel clarified Councilmember Buckshnis' motion, that the data regarding the cost of undergrounding would include the cost to have undergrounding assessed by the consultant as well as the cost of proceeding with undergrounding as a construction project. Mr. English said the contracts include funding for the entire utility undergrounding design. The intent was to do a preliminary assessment on the cost to underground and bring that to council. There would be some expenditure of consultant fees to get to that point, but it would not be to the extent Mr. Hauss referenced earlier on Stage 3. There would be a point at which the council would decide whether to go forward or remove undergrounding from the project. Councilmember Teitzel anticipated there could be a decision point soon in the very early stage of the L project whether council wants to assess undergrounding and it would be very helpful to have that information next week. Mr. English explained the council would not have that touchpoint until about six months into the contract; likely spring, when staff would come back to council after the consultant had done a preliminary assessment of what it would cost to underground the utilities. Staff would present that ° cost and council would make a decision whether to proceed. Councilmember Teitzel clarified council c could potentially have the discretion next week if this is removed from consent for further discussion to n entirely remove the investigation of undergrounding from the consultant scope of work which would Q reduce the price of the consultant's work. Mr. English agreed the council had that authority. N N W Councilmember Buckshnis said she was interested in finding out a ballpark amount for the No undergrounding. In response to a comment she made during the special meeting tonight, she checked her w notes and the amount the City received for Highway 99 was $24 million, not $240 million. c m AMENDMENT CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER PAINE VOTING NO. z MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Q 1. 2023 PUBLIC WORKS & UTILITIES BUDGET PRESENTATION Public Works Director Oscar Antillon explained the presentation is overview of the public works team's accomplishments over the past year and of what public works does for the city. He reviewed: • Public Works — who are we? o The Public Works Department provides, planning engineering, operation & maintenance of city owned facilities and public infrastructure o Our goal is to serve the community and to enhance the quality of life in the city. We achieve this through a department that is community and customer focused. We embrace leadership in Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 20 Packet Pg. 37 7.2.a environmental and energy design concepts & principles and leverage technology & management principles to achieve operational effectiveness. o The "Ready & Resilient" theme for this year public works week highlights the ability of these professionals to perform regular public works duties and be ready at a moment's notice to react as first responders during natural disasters and overcome trials seen in the field. • Public Works Budget Overview Department 2022 2023 Engineering $ 2,847,103 $ 3,211,439 Water $ 11,492,138 $ 11,322,550 Sewer $ 31,340,523 $ 15,368,746 Transportation $ 14,664,402 $ 13,714,604 Stormwater $ 9,620,346 $ 7,211,280 Facilities $ 3,450,275 $ 2,364,445 Fleet $ 1,942,460 $ 1,704,220 $ 75,357,247 $ 54,897,284 City Engineer Rob English reviewed: • Engineering Accomplishments o Streets I Transportation ■ Completed - Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements - 2022 Pavement Overlay Project ■ Started - Highway 99 Gateway & Revitalization Project — Stage 2 - 76' Ave Overlay Project o Utilities ■ Water - 1,085 feet of watermain replaced ■ Sewer - 1,676 feet of sewer pipeline replaced ■ Storm - 2,420 feet of pipe replaced - 28 drainage structures replaced - Seaview Infiltration Facility construction started 0 Private o Grants ■ $22.5M State Grant (Move Ahead WA) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 21 Packet Pg. 38 N N W N O w m E z Q 7.2.a - Highway 99 Revitalization Stage 3 ■ $2,597,500 Federal Grant - Highway 99 Revitalization Stage 4 - Right of Way phase ■ $700,000 Federal Grant - Pavement overlay of Olympic View Drive (196th St -Talbot) ■ $237,750 Federal Grant Supplement - Supplemental funding for 76th Ave Overlay and SR-104 Adaptive System projects ■ $500,000 Department of Ecology Grant - To purchase the property at 7317 Lake Ballinger Blvd o Decision Package Engineering ■ Capital Projects Manager (DP#31) - $160,640 to hire a Capital Projects Manager to manage and deliver capital improvement projects related to the Highway 99 corridor and other transportation and utility improvement projects. The position will be programmed in the Engineering Division budget and the cost paid by the Street Fund (Grant & Gas Tax Revenue), Utility Funds and REET Funds depending on the projects managed by the position. - $30,000 for an additional vehicle to support the position. The initial vehicle purchase would be paid from a General Fund Transfer. Mr. Antillon reviewed: Water o Source: ■ Primary - Alderwood Water and Wastewater District/City of Everett Sultan River. Original agreement in 1978, Current agreement 2010-2055. (24") ■ Secondary/Emergency - Seattle Public Utilities/Tolt River. 2011- long-term standby supply for emergencies. (12") ■ Emergency intertie connections - City of Lynwood - Olympic View Water and Sewer District o Storage Capacity: 7.5 MG (4 Reservoirs) ■ Five Corners Reservoirs: 3 MG and 1.5 MG ■ Seaview Reservoir 1.5 MG ■ Yost Reservoir 1.5 MG o Distribution System: ■ 138 Miles of water pipe ■ 1 Pump station at Five Corners ■ 18 pressure reducing stations ■ 8 different pressure zones ■ Valves:3129 ■ Hydrants:1205 ■ Blow-off.305 ■ Track 2692 backflow assemblies o Water systems ■ City Owned system: 10,372 service connections (80% of the City) ■ Olympic View Water & Sewer District (20%) o Comprehensive Water System Plan (2017) Alderwood Supply Station Ca acit m Year 2014 2034 Available Capacity 7000 7000 Peak Day Demand 4052 4611 Surplus 2948 2389 • Water Fund 2061 agreement for Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 22 Packet Pg. 39 N N W N 0 T W m z Q 7.2.a o Operations & Maintenance (Fund 421) ■ Last year the Water Department performed or responded to: - 2535 utility locate requests completed. - 782 resident calls for service - Repaired two water main breaks - Flushed 325 dead end blow offs - Inspected 517 hydrants - Inspected and operated 516 valves - Installed 37 new water services - Replaced 248 Water meters - Rebuilt 4 control valve stations - Cleaned, inspected and provided underground reservoir at Seaview o 2023 Decision Packages seismic assessment of the 1.5 million -gallon DP Pur ose Bud et #32 Utility Rate Increase (water, sewer, storm) $125,152 #33 Water Operations & Capital Increase $245,500 #34 Phase 12 Waterline Replacement $10,000 #35 Phase 14 Waterline Replacement 2024 $506,128 #36 2023 Waterline Replacement Overlays $50,000 #37 Yost & Seaview Reservoirs Repairs & Upgrades $805,000 #38 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement 2023 $1,700,000 Sewer o The City owns and operates the collection and treatment systems. Approximately 80% of the city sewer is treated at the City plant, the rest is treated at the Lynwood treatment plant. o Collection system ■ 186 Miles of sewer pipe ■ 14 sewer lift stations ■ 29 Residential grinder pumps ■ Manholes and clean outs: 3425 ■ 9800 accounts, City of Edmonds o Treatment Service area ■ City of Edmonds approximately 50% ■ City of Mountlake Terrace ■ Olympic View Water Sewer District ■ Portions of City of Shoreline o Sewer Fund Operations and Maintenance (Fund 423) ■ The Sewer Department performed or responded to: - 16 Lift Station motors and pump pulled and repaired due to plugs / blockages. - Upgraded LS #1 motor controls to soft starts. - Emergency replacement of LS #1 pump and motor due to equipment failure. - Jetted 95,000 ft of sewer pipe. - Camera inspection 90,000 ft of pipe. - 21 root intrusions blockages cleared. - 5 Grease blockages cleared. Wastewater Treatment Plant o Plant statistics Built in 1957, upgraded in 1967 & 1986 ($35M) Capacity: - Max Design Flow 11.8 MGD - Peak Daily Design Flow 21.5 MGD - Avg Summer Flow 4 MGD Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 23 Packet Pg. 40 N N W N O w m E z Q 7.2.a - Avg Winter Flow 6.5 MGD ■ Carbon recovery project will be substantially complete by the end of the year, with commissioning starting in January and expected full operation by June 2023. ■ FOG Program - In 2022 the city re-established the position of Pretreatment Technician, he started in April and already inspected over 300 locations in Edmonds, Olympic View and Mountlake Terrace. - Also completed inspection at 47 dental offices. o One reportable incident in 2022 (January 4) o Wastewater decision packages DP Pur ose Budget #54 WWTP Clarifier 1 Rehab $177,754 #55 Vacuum Filter Replacement $95,202 #56 Nuvoda Design $452,361 #57 Joint Sealant $90,742 #58 WWTP $ 69,000 Sewer Fund (422) o 2023 Decision Packages DP Purpose Budget #47 Purchase of new sewer Vehicle & GPS Equip. $ 48,900 #48 Sewer Operations Increase $ 6,000 #49 Closeout costs for Phase 9 Sewer Replacement -2022 $ 30,000 #50 Design Costs for Phase 11 2024 Sewer Replacement $ 349,517 #51 2023 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Overlays $ 200,000 #52 Phase 10 Sewer Replacement 2023 $ 1,689,212 #53 1 CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase 3 2023 $ 423,710 Street & Storm o Street centerline miles: 145.9 o Stormwater pipe miles: 140.3 o Stormwater catch basin: 7,290 o Stormwater manhole: 1,897 o Responsible for the maintenance and operation of the city owned infrastructure in the right of way. ■ Storm Drain System - Street sweeping - Drain structures maintenance and inspection ■ Roadways ■ City owned sidewalks ■ Street signs ■ Streetlights/signals ■ Street/roadways markings ■ Emergency response ■ Snow removal o Accomplishments: ■ Emergency Response 37 ■ Pavement Repairs 358 ■ Signal Maintenance (hrs) 562 ■ Centerline/Fog line parking and curb painting 133 Miles ■ Crosswalks striping/New tape 43 ■ Arrows striping/New tape 22 ■ ADA Ramps 9 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 24 Packet Pg. 41 N N W N 0 T w m E z Q 7.2.a ■ Sidewalk repairs 14 ■ Hazard trees 14 ■ Snow and Ice OT hours 604 ■ Snow Response Gallons of Brine 4800 ■ Community events support hrs. 571 ■ Storm System Maintenance basins 4083 ■ Storm System Maintenance Manholes 924 ■ Storm System new pipe (linear feet) 2005 ■ Storm video inspection (linear feet) 9756 ■ New baisins 60 ■ Rehab storm surface structures 5 ■ Street Sweeping (miles) 6955 o Materials Used ■ Asphalt (Tons) 260 ■ Paint (Gal) 2500 ■ Concrete (CY) 73 ■ Sand for snow removal (CY) 300 ■ Salt (CY) 40 ■ Brine (Gal) 4800 ■ Waste from storm drain system (Tons) 480 ■ Waste from street sweeping (Tons) 240 o Street and Storm Future Improvements (unfunded) ■ Cover for Salt and Construction Materials ■ Currently our setup does not comply with best practices for storing of salt and construction materials. ■ Uncovered materials can contaminate the storm drain system. Stormwater Fund (422) o 2023 Decision Packages DP Pur ose Budget #39 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Project $ 750,000 #40 Seaview Infiltration Facility Phase 2 $ 10,000 #41 2023 SD Overlays $ 200,000 #42 Phase 4 Storm Maintenance Project (2024) $ 290,000 #43 Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update $ 150,000 #44 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects $ 120,000 #45 Storm & Surface Water Comprehensive Plan Update $ 600,000 #46 7317 Lake Ballinger Way Flood lain Removal $ 750,000 Transportation Funds (112, 125, 126, 422) o 2023 Decision Packages DP Purpose Budget #62 Transportation Plan Update $ 170,000 #63 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW Improvements $ 761,250 #64 2023 Pavement Overlay Program $ 1,500,000 #65 76th Ave W Overlay from 196th St SW to OVD $ 15,000 #66 Stage 2 Hwy 99 Revitalization $ 2,646,000 #67 Stage 3 Hwy 99 Revitalization $ 1,180,000 #68 Stage 4 Hwy 99 Revitalization $ 740,000 #69 Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave to 9th Ave $ 157,000 #70 SR-104 Adaptive System from 236th St SW to 226th $ 243,440 #71 Citywide Bicycle Improvement Program $ 1,771,847 #72 Green Streets $ 297,744 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 25 Packet Pg. 42 N N W N O w m E z cc Q 7.2.a #73 2023 Traffic Signal Safety & Upgrades $ 30,280 #74 2023 Guardrail Program $ 20,190 #75 2023 Pedestrian Safety Program $ 20,195 #76 2023 Traffic Calming Program $ 15,130 #77 Citywide Street Lighting Study $ 60,000 #78 1 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave S to 9th Ave S $ 901,974 Facilities Maintenance and Operations o Responsible for the Maintenance and operation of the City's buildings 0 7 Day support 0 40 restrooms cleaned 2X day 0 6 Locker -rooms & 2 Laundry facilities ■ Janitorial ■ HVAC ■ Plumbing ■ Electrical ■ Building envelope ■ Elevators o Maintain 21 Buildings totaling 450,000 SF o Accomplishments ■ Frances Anderson Center - Permitted and converted 4000sf of classroom to office space for human services and park and rec (unscheduled - Elevator code compliance updates - Fire panel code compliance updates - Steam boiler repair and recertification - Sno-King Youth Club flooring and office remodel 400sf - Sculptures Workshop hall flooring 2500sf - Interior painting 12 class/dance rooms and 10 restrooms ■ City Hall - Conversion of five whole building ventilation fans to freestat lock out control b - Engineering storage room conversion to commuter bicycle storage room > Public Safety n - Chronic roof and siding leak repair Q - Boiler replacement with two high efficiency boilers - Women's locker room remodel N - 8 offices painted and reconfigured o - Evidence dryer installed r - Sergeants office remodel w Meadowdale Club House m - Classroom new flooring z - Stairs re -treaded - Ballroom new flooring Q Neighborhood City Office - Move in remodel Exterior Painting Projects - FS 16 - Museum trim - Log Cabin trim - Meadowdale Club House - Public Works roof coating - Public Works trim o Projects in progress or planning process by Facilities Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 26 Packet Pg. 43 7.2.a - Library remodel - Boys & Girls Club emergency floor repair - Police fence - Neighborhood City Office lobby remodel - Public EV charging network expansion - Public Safety solar plant - Frances Anderson Center compliance with Clean Building Act - Frances Anderson Center boiler replacement (non -fossil fuel option) Facilities Condition Index Boys and Girls Club 0.03 0.09 $1,571,834 Cemetery Building 0.01 0.08 $173,187 City Hall 0.03 0.09 $7,811,942 Fishing Pier 0.06 0.08 $205,572 Francers Anderson Center 0.10 0.1 $12,609,520 FS 16 0.02 0.09 0.05 $2,957,771 FS 17 0.03 $2,708,987 FS 20 0.02 $1,764,134 Historic Log Cabin 0.09 $95,286 Historical Museum 0.07 0.08 $1,061,376 Library and Plaza Room 0.09 $5,096,125 Meadowdal Club House 0.04 0.10 0.05 $905,593 Old Public Works 0.02 0.09 0.04 $3,189,352 Parks Maint. Building $1,257,653 Public Safety Building 0.02 0.08 $8,849,286 Public Works O&M Center 0.01 0.1 $4,637,002 Senior/Waterfront Center 0.10 0.17 0.0001 $6,432,919 Wade James Theater .01 $2,051,430 Facilities Maintenance Funds (422, 016 and Bonds) o 2023 Decision Packages DP Purpose Budget #30 Citywide Unscheduled Repairs & Maintenance $ 200,000 #61 Bond Funded Deferred Maintenance Projects $ 1,215,000 o Facilities Maintenance non -capital repair and maintenance General Fund (DP#30) ■ The City most recent Facilities Condition Assessment (McKinstry, 2018) shows an approximate backlog of $10,000,000 plus an ongoing approx. $825,000/year of non - capital maintenance funding to be financially sustainable and not to continue to grow the significant backlog. Facilities is currently awaiting an update to the Facilities Condition Assessment data recorded in summer and fall 2022. 2015 = $56,000 (Historic funding le 2016 = $100,000 5ffi orless d,fened Maintenance 2017 = $256,000 10% or less deferred anal ale nance 2019 = $700,000 _10%* deferred maintenance 2020 = $1,500,000 2021 = $710,222 2022 = $980,000 2023 = $200,000 E&UMM o Facilities Bond Funded Projects (Fund 016) - $1,215,000 (DP#61) ■ Frances Anderson Center Projects - Gym Floor refurbishment and striping - Transom Window replacements - Fire Panel replacement - Radiator Valve replacements (55ea.) - Drinking fountain replacement w/bottle fill ■ City Park Maintenance Facility - Parking lot overlay (Asphalt) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 27 Packet Pg. 44 N N W N 0 T W a+ C d E t V 1a Q 7.2.a - Gazebo Roof Replacement Fire Station 17 - Apparatus Bay ceiling replacement Log Cabin - Roof Replacement (More projects listed in Decision Package) Fleet o Maintenance and operation of the City owned fleet. o Current inventory: 203 vehicles/equipment ■ Passenger vehicles ■ Maintenance vehicles ■ Police vehicles ■ Civil engineering support equipment �.., T_-_, -- ork orders ■ Preventive Maintenance f Repairs Other o Fleet Fund 511 ■ 2023 Decision Packages ri DP Purpose Budget #59 2023 Pre -Scheduled Vehicle Replacement $ 633,000 #60 Increases to Fleet Maintenance Costs $ 130,000 o Mechanic Workload Trend Year/Number of Mechanics Vehicles/Equipment per mechanic Increase 2008/3 63 2009/2 63 26 2022/2 63 39 2023/2 63 43 Fund 511 Operations & Maintenance DP#59 (511 0 438-POL 2017 Ford Explorer (Patrol) 0 437-POL 2017 Ford Explorer (Patrol) 0 23- SWR 2008 Ford F-450 Utility Body 0 35-SWR 2008 Ford F-450 Utility Body 0 24-WTR 2008 Ford F-450 Box Truck 0 37-WTR 2008 Ford F-450 Utility Body 0 28-PRK 2004 Chevy Silverado 2500 0 88-ENG 2004 Chevy Colorado 0 22-STR 200 International 5yrd Dump Truck Historic replacement 0 2018 - $636,000 0 2019 - $1,750,000 0 2020 - $628,000 0 2021 - $262,000 0 2022 - $485,000 0 2023 - $633,000 `B'Fund) Replaced with 2023 Ford Explorer Hybrid Replaced with a 2023 Ford Explorer Hybrid Replaced with a 2023 Ford F-450 Utility Body Replaced with a 2023 Ford F-250 Utility Body Replaced with a 2023 Ford F-450 Box Truck Replaced with a 2023 Ford F-450 Utility Body Replaced with a 2023 Ford F-250 with Canopy Replaced with a 2023 Ford Ranger with Canopy Replaced with a 2023 Peterbuilt 33k GVW Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 28 Packet Pg. 45 N N W N O w m E z Q 7.2.a • Fleet Cost Increases (511 Funds) o Operations & Maintenance DP#60 ■ Add $40,000 to the annual Diesel fuel budget ■ Add $75,000 to the annual Regular Unleaded fuel budget ■ Add $15,000 to the Supplies (Parts) budget Councilmember Paine thanked public works for all they do, noting they have a sterling reputation for customer service. She asked about the scope of the capital projects manager. City Engineer Rob English responded it would be similar to the other four and funded from capital projects; depending on what they are working on, the funding source could be utility revenue, grant funds, gas tax revenue, etc. Just like the existing project managers, the goals is cradle to grave project management to minimize problems if one person does design and another does construction. The person will have office time and in -field time doing inspections and tracking the contractor's progress. Councilmember Paine said the bipartisan infrastructure law, which has funds for transportation alternatives and a whole range of things, would be a good opportunity to clear out some of the backlog. Mr. Antillon commented these positions are critical, people who understand construction and construction management. One of the biggest projects is the carbon recovery project and the amount of work required to scrutinize and get that project to completion. He is working with the Department of Enterprise Services to ensure they are doing the work and that the project is properly managed. He may ask council for additional assistance to complete the project. Councilmember Nand said she was speaking on behalf of a lot of citizens when she said public works was vital especially during extreme weather events like snow. She asked about clearing snow from main arterials as well as side streets, envisioning it would be difficult to navigate the hills with a plow attached to an F-250 or F-350. She asked if there were plans for a dedicated snow plow vehicle since snow is hitting the region more often and people are afraid to drive in the snow. She also asked about the use of sand and salt, acknowledging the controversial use of salt due to environmental issues. Mr. English answered he has been working with the City's ops team on this. The City has two 10-yard snow plow trucks (dump trucks with a snow plow on the front) and one 5-yard truck. Two pieces of equipment will be requested via a fourth quarter budget amendment including a 3-yard dump truck (F-550) and a hook and lift system installed on one of the new truck chassis to lift the concrete mixer off the back of a truck and set it up for a snow plow to provide more flexibility. With regard to salt versus sand, Mr. English said there is an environmental impact with both, depending N on the aquatic resource. The plan during the upcoming season is to use the right material at the right time. W N Crews would still primarily use CMA in advance of a freeze, but in a snowstorm use sand with CMA and potentially a salt/sand mix depending on conditions. w m Mr. English explained because vehicle purchases have a long lead time, staff is looking at either leasing E the 3-yard truck ahead of the snow season or hiring a service to provide both the operator and a truck 0 during an extreme event. Councilmember Nand commented this is an ADA disabilities issue. Edmonds Q has a large senior citizen population who can be scared to walk or drive when it is snowing and could become homebound very quickly. Councilmember Teitzel asked jokingly what public works did in their spare time. He referred to the budget for 2022 and 2023 in the presentation, observing the 2022 sewer budget is approximately $31.3 million and 2023is about $15.3 million. He asked what portion of that was related to the WWTP work, whether it was 50% or less. Mr. Antillon answered it was more than 50%. He offered to provide that information. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 29 Packet Pg. 46 7.2.a Councilmember Teitzel referred to a $500,000 expenditure to purchase property at 7317 Lake Ballinger Boulevard which is uninhabitable and flooded. He asked how that property would be used, whether it could be a pocket park. Mr. English answered there are restrictions with DOE stormwater grants. It cannot become a park, but other stormwater attributes could be added to the site to improve the water quality of runoff from the property before it goes into the lake such as a rain garden. It is still too early to have a firm answer on that, that is something that will be considered further down the road on that project. Councilmember Tibbott asked whether DP#31, the project manager, would reduce consulting or project manager fees. Mr. English answered probably not now because the workload is increasing. Adding that position adds capacity to handle the workload, but there will still be consultant contracts. The project manager is the owner interface/manager to facilitate that work, but resources for design and inspection will still be needed. If there is an economic downturn and grant or project revenues decline, that person could be moved into a design role which would save on consultant costs. Councilmember Tibbott requested the council be provided the updated PowerPoint presentation. With regard to the decision package related to vehicle purchases, he asked staff to provide the mileage of the vehicles proposed to be replaced. He asked if vehicles would be replaced with hybrid or electric vehicles whenever possible. Mr. Antillon answered yes, although for the F-450s, there is nothing commercially available. Each vehicle has a different standard related to the life and mileage expectations, but at the end of the day, it is the mechanics' discretion. For example, some vehicles can have high mileage, but are in good condition and those would be retained. Councilmember Tibbott observed the vehicles proposed to be replaced are ones that really need to be replaced. Observing it was now 9:57 p.m. and the council had at least 1'/2 hours of discussion on the remaining two agenda items, Mayor Nelson asked how the council would like to proceed. Council President Olson relayed the planning board uses council chambers tomorrow night, so the council will need to decide whether to add another hour to tonight's meeting or some councilmembers are available tomorrow from 4-5 p.m.; she is not as she will on a flight during that time. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 11 P.M. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT VOTING NO. Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. N 2. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VISIONING SUMMARY C4 N O Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin relayed this item is to talk about the comprehensive w plan and in particular the visioning process that was conducted during six week this summer. She will not reveal the vision statement tonight because work is still being done on it including reviewing the summary provided in the packet and taking into consideration all the comments received including from some councilmembers who completed the survey this past week. She introduced Senior Planner Brad Shipley, the lead for the community outreach and deputy project manager on the comprehensive plan. She Q reviewed: Approach o Intent ■ Reach populations we don't often hear from in the public process ■ Strategy ■ Inclusive branding ■ Survey and marketing in multiple languages ■ Meet people where they are ■ Have a neighborhood presence Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 30 Packet Pg. 47 7.2.a ■ Test new outreach strategies ■ Willingness to make mistakes and learn - not let imperfection be the enemy of good intent o Goal ■ Solicit 3,500 comments from the community ■ One comment equals: - Each response to a survey question - Each comment recorded at outreach event ■ Over 8,500 comments were collected via: Yard signs Coffee Chats RAISEAWARENESS I Panel discussion THEMED NEIGHBORHOOD CONVERSATIONS //// 194DEPTHCONVERSATIONSONIU-YTOPICS -'1/ FROM SUBJECT NATTER EI{PERIS Weekly articles - I, Walk & Talks HELP PUTWEERLYTH EMES INTO CONTEXTi EYRORE KEY TOPICS IN REAL WORLDSCENA1105 l , � Online surveys Table at local events ALLOW moan DUAL EXPRESSION MEETING PEOPLEWHERE THEYARE Muiti-lingual branding �l L+'' w I Iwo", of PROCESS OF BUILDING TRUST INC�(f�r,� 0 `AA IIFFFWWI� �1-. . �4 o Survey Provided in Korean, simple Chinese and Spanish a ■ Two to four questions each ■ r Qualitative (open-ended) and quantitative (multiple-choice) questions - Qualitative comments limited to 140 characters to encourage succinct responses L - Intent was to allow individual expression while reducing chance for misinterpretation and to process in a timely manner ■ Option to take full survey provided o Events o ■ Comments cataloged the same as survey > ■ Comment logs created for each event ° ■ Tracked the number of people engage and what we heard Q What we heard - survey results, community conversations �- o Percent of Total Survey Responses, by Neighborhood N ■ Downtown 37% N ■ Westgate 10% w ■ Other* 10% ■ Seaview 8% m ■ Five Corners 7% z ■ Pine Ridge 4% ■ Perrinville 4% Q ■ Highway 99 3% ■ Esperance 3% ■ Lake Ballinger 3% ■ Firdale 3% ■ Meadowdale 2% ■ Sherwood Forest 2% ■ Talbot Park 1 % ■ I do not live in Edmonds 1 % ■ Town of Woodway 0.3% Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 31 Packet Pg. 48 7.2.a *common "other responses: Maplewood, Emerald Hills, Uptown, Yost Park, specific intersections o Residency in years, number of responses ■ Less than 1 22 ■ 1-2 45 ■ 3-5 86 ■ 6-10 106 ■ 11-15 79 ■ 16-25 95 ■ 26-35 85 ■ 36-50 57 ■ More than 50 28 ■ I do not live in Edmonds 16 _ • Survey Responses N o What do you love about Edmonds? N ■ Small-town feel Sri ■ Access to waterfront and nature ■ Walkability 0 ■ Locally owned businesses 0 ■ Thriving arts and culture scene w ■ Sentiment was universal - not particular to a specific neighborhood o How would you like to see your values reflected in Edmonds? c ■ Environmental stewardship - Protect natural areas c ■ Commitment to being inclusive and celebrating our diversity ■ Improve infrastructure for walking and biking ■ Disparate comments regarding growth - Oppose high density a - Recognition of need for more housing options o What do you like about living in Edmonds: c ■ Waterfront access ■ Cost of housing 0 ■ Cost of living Q ■ Medical care and services for Seniors Q ■ Convenient commute N ■ School district In N ■ Access to multicultural resources ■ Other - arts and culture, proximity to natural resources, parks and trails, walkability, w cleanliness, community events, infrastructure and community services ■ Public transportation and walkability E ■ Attractions & Entertainment ■ Restaurants and shopping Q ■ Small town feel o Is there anything you don't like about Edmonds ■ Being too car centric - Lack of sidewalks - Need for better public transportation - Speeding driver - Imbalance of parking ■ Government - Inequitable distribution of fund - Lack of transparency and accountability Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 32 Packet Pg. 49 7.2.a - Concern only the loudest voices are heard ■ Mixed response to land capacity - Increased density is not desired by some - Others say there is not enough housing o What kind of businesses (good and service) do you travel outside the city for? ■ Larger retailers in Lynnwood and U-District - Mentions of Alderwood Mall, Central Market, Costco, Fred Meyer ■ Sentiment that big -box and large retailers are not needed in Edmonds —it's ok to travel to some things o Do you work in Edmonds ■ 72% no ■ 28% yes o If you do not work in Edmonds, what kind of work do you leave the city for? ■ Retired 35% ■ Education, training, library 8% ■ Healthcare 8% ■ Tech 8% o What are you most concerned about when it comes to environmental future of Edmonds? ■ Water protection - Sea -level rise - Protection of streams - Pollution c ■ Green Space - Retaining or replacing tree canopy - Notable mention of "right tree, right place" for preservation of views ■ Land capacity - Density is harmful, citing associated tree canopy loss and increased traffic - Others say density is a solution, citing walkable communities and sustainable a buildings as an outcome o What do you feel like your ethnicity and culture are represented in Edmonds? What c ethnicity(s) and culture(s) would you like to see better represented in Edmonds? ■ Commonly skipped question L ■ Large majority who answered self -identified as "white" and said "yes" n ■ For "needs more" responses, most common answers are "all non -white cultures" and Q Indigenous/Native American N ■ Many found the question divisive N o What can the City do to better celebrate diverse cultures? ■ Partner with ethnic and cultural minority communities w - Honor holidays that aren't white dominate culture - Honor cultural presence through events and public art E ■ Increase representations in hiring and elected and appointed positions ■ Install streetscape design that acknowledges culture, heritage and language Q o How else could improve your neighborhood? ■ Walkability - Maintain/repair existing sidewalks, lighting, crosswalks for people with mobility issues ■ Road maintenance and safety - Traffic calming - Improve cyclists' safety ■ More public space - Green space - Space for families with young children Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 33 Packet Pg. 50 7.2.a ■ Keep small-town atmosphere Next Steps o Continue to analyze results o Draft vision statement o Reveal vision statement (Portchfest Nov. 5"') o Validate through survey and community champions advisory committee o Briefings at planning board and city council Project timeline 2022 2023 2024 Visioning s<epknn Svonarko Cwakopm.nl Con<�rNncy tlraFt Plan �ocomems Initial Can Emablish beards Eetahlien C—mily FYuk Wun Teen Me¢v ugs 6 Cwnml.nMY Ceampbm Aencm �. Admsory Grwo Greup Continuous puC4c engagement. With regard to the responsiveness to the surveys, given Edmonds' large senior citizen, Councilmember Nand suggested doing what the mayor's office did, providing physical mailers, which might result in more responses. For example, she is almost 40 and does not usually use QR codes and it may not be something that registers with seniors. Regarding the survey response about celebrating other holidays, she was a board member of Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, a 3-person staff organization that does incredible things in the community and there is a large misconception that the City puts on celebrations like 4t' of July, tree lighting ceremony and Halloween, the traditional, Americana type holidays. For example, she is Hindu, and Diwali was yesterday which raises the question of why the City doesn't do a Diwali lighting ceremony or for people of the Jewish faith, why the City doesn't light a menorah. The Chamber of Commerce board gets annoyed when the City uses photographs of their events, furthering the perception that the City, not the Chamber, organizes and funds those events. From a legal standpoint, if the City were to start doing Diwali lighting ceremonies or lighting a menorah, it becomes a matter of first amendment freedom of religion, access has to be provided to everyone and certain religions, such as the Church of Satan which is very politically active, may demand to have an event. She suggested talking to the diversity commission and the city attorney about to incorporate a more culturally diverse holiday calendar. Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for the outreach effort and the great results. With regard to celebrating holidays, he complimented Mayor Nelson for starting the new year with a Chinese New Year 04 celebration. He pointed out the survey process did not include mention of public safety, which is the o number one priority for the City and for him as a councilmember. For the City to have peaceful life, and w enjoyment, public safety needs to be included. Ms. McLaughlin explained this was a high level sentiment survey that corresponded with the exact chapters of the comprehensive plan. Survey comments addressed public safety, particularly the perceived recent increase in crime. Councilmember Chen suggested future z surveys include a specific question about public safety. Q Council President Olson said she provided some written comments to staff, but would not recap them in the interest of time. With regard to the ethnicity and culture question that staff assessed as something people were uncomfortable with, it could be that people didn't answer because there were two ways of interpreting the question. For example, she interpreted it differently than staff, she interpreted it as what someone wanted to see represented in celebrations. If the question was interpreted the way staff did, people may not have felt that was a role for government. Council President Olson said she was glad to see views expressed with regard to right tree right place as that is a very strong interest and value in Edmonds. With regard to environmental stewardship, she pointed out the City and electeds can do environmental stewardship, but there is also a great volunteer Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 34 Packet Pg. 51 7.2.a culture in Edmonds, something that should be fostered and encouraged to make the City almost like a co- op. Clean and safe streets, and public safety is definitely a value in Edmonds. She thanked staff for the packet, commenting the outreach was excellent; staff can't make people participate, but they definitely did everything in their power. Ms. McLaughlin acknowledged that question could be misinterpreted because it included the word celebrate which could be taken in a variety of ways. The key themes were interest in more opportunities for an equitable, inclusive, welcoming and culturally diverse City. That comes through in the values and there is work to do; this is the beginning of the journey. Councilmember Teitzel thanked staff for their work, recognizing it is a huge lift getting all these survey responses and being everywhere to get input. He referred to the comparison of respondents by neighborhood, which indicated there were 32 respondents from Highway 99. He was a little uncomfortable with drawing conclusions about the needs and wants of a community on such a small number of respondents. He asked what percentage that number represented of the total households in the Highway 99 area. Ms. McLaughlin said she did not have that exact number. While Highway 99 is described as a neighborhood and that was one of the options, those lines are ambiguous and can include adjacent areas such as Lake Ballinger and Esperance. She agreed the number of respondents from that neighborhood were not great. Many different ways of outreach were utilized and will continue to be utilized. The community champions advisory committee will be an opportunity for long term engagement in a meaningful way Ms. McLaughlin continued, as Councilmember Chen has mentioned in the past, people who are underrepresented often work 2-3 jobs and may have trust challenges with public government. She clarified she was acknowledging that, not using it an excuse, but the survey responses are a baseline to shape the next phase of engagement. This, coupled with the equitable engagement framework will provide the tools to do a better job. She summarized there is a long history in Edmonds that cannot be fixed overnight. Councilmember Teitzel recognized it was challenging and assured his comments/questions were not intended to be critical. Councilmember Teitzel asked what percentage of the 32 respondents represent the various ethnic breakdowns in that area. Ms. McLaughlin said this stage, the sentiment survey, intentionally did not ask for race, cultural, social economic, etc. information to avoid burdening survey respondents with providing a lot of personal information. That will be important in future surveys regarding specific topics. N Councilmember Paine agreed this was the beginning. She suggested finding opportunities for the best N environmental design using crime prevention through environmental design (SPTED) and partnering with T Chief Bennett. She looked forward to future conversations regarding the comprehensive plan update. w 3. EDMONDS DOWNTOWN ALLIANCE 2023 WORK PLAN AND BUDGET E z Community Services & Economic Development Director Todd Tatum began with what is a BID. They first stated in Canada in the early 1970s and were immediately implemented across the border in the Q United States. Since then, countries around the world have used the U.S. model to implement their own business improvement districts/areas. These organizations focus heavily on urban renewal and competitiveness in the rise of suburbanism which saw the demise of so many historic downtowns. Malls and shopping areas in suburban America were able to market coherently, cost-effectively and collective which put places like Edmonds in a challenging competitive landscape, a dynamic that continues today. Mr. Tatum continued, BIDS at their heart are public private partnerships. They leverage the strength of the government and couple it with the strengths of a talented business community. They allow cities to act entrepreneurially and lend to managerial energy in solving problems like were seen during the pandemic. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 35 Packet Pg. 52 7.2.a BIDS are seen across the country as important to the protection of social spaces. This is seen in Edmonds' vibrant downtown which functions as a social space for residents. The organization has to undertake some level of strategic thinking in order to operate which is seen in the lift in attractiveness, strategic planning, cohesiveness in appearance and in brand. Brand and identity is a critical area where BIDS have a massive impact. Visitors are drawn to the downtown core due to the brand, the identity that is carefully cultivated, differentiated and that makes their value proposition clear to the visiting public. Mr. Tatum continued, This brand is essential to business attraction and retention and to attracting investment. This has been seen in places like Graphite and The Commons; these organizations see the value of the brand and choose to invest here. There are many ways to judge the success of a BID including sociability, social commons a BID helps create, effectiveness of their marketing, whether they achieve their goals, how much work they do, attractiveness of the area, business attraction and development, real estate development and brand. He reviewed: • Daily Visitors Tend 5,0ay eauiq average aK 6K 4K 2K Jan 20 Feb 20 Mar'20 Apr'211 May'20 Jun 20 A 20 Aug'20 Sep 20 ^_01 B 02019 02020 202' 02022 • A regional and national destination o Map of where visitors to Edmonds come from OWN NW20 OK 20 202 Kimberly Koenig, Ed! President and owner of Rogue Boutique, commented prior to her career at Rogue, she spent two decades in marketing and media with national and regional clients. She loves using her experience from both rungs of her life for Edmonds. She reviewed Ed!: Creating a vital and vibrant downtown: • Why Ed!? o A self -funding mechanism to support downtown -only marketing and programs o To create something bigger and better than any one of our businesses could accomplish on our own o Encourage to view Ed! as partners o Enhance community connections o Bring a high level of professionalism to our downtown brand and marketing Approved Categories in BID Ordinance o Marketing & Hospitality o Safety & Cleanliness o Appearance & Environment o Transportation o Business Recruitment & Retention o Organization Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 36 Packet Pg. 53 N N W N O w m E z Q Ed!'s Mission Statement: Ed! is a focused, funded organization that supports and improves business conditions in Edmonds. Our goal is to ensure our downtown stays lively, attractive, prosperous and welcoming to everyone. Ed's Membership + Assessment o Approximately 400 members o Average payment is $265/year o Rates purposefully low with no increases Square Footage Open Door Business By -Appointment/ Office -Based Bans. 0 - 499 sq. ft. S360/year $120/year $90/quarter $30/quarter 500 - 999 sq. & S420/year $180/year $105/quarter $45/quarter 1,000 -1,999 sq. ft. $480/year $240/year $120/quarter $60/quarter 2,000 - 4,999 sq. ft. $540/year $300/year S135/quarter $75/quarter 5000+sq.& $600/year $3401y"r S150/quarter $90/quarter 2022-2023 Member Advisory Board (4 Open Door and 4 By Appointment) o Kimberly Koenig, President (Rogue) o Jen Lawson, Vice President (Crow) o Beth Sanger, Secretary (Ombu Salon + Spa) :z c o Matt McCulloch, Treasurer (Peoples Bank) o Cheryl Farrish (Certa Farrish Law Group) o Robert Boehlke (House Wares) o Olivia Brown -Latham (Sugarology Edmonds) a o Ricky Bobadilla (Santa Fe Mexican Grill & Cantina) o Devyn Cox (Body Motion Physical Therapy) c o Carrie Hulbert, Program Manager 79 Professional Expertise L o Volunteer advisory board of member business representatives have a wide range of expertise, Q offering their fresh ideas for free Q o Paid experts with extensive professional experience are utilized strategically N o This combination of skills results in highly professional, targeted and nimble executions with N a small budget T Comparison of Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, Ed!, and Downtown Edmonds Merchant Meet w Up (formerly DEMA) E z Q Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 37 Packet Pg. 54 7.2.a c Edmonds Chamber of Commerce Edmonds • Downtown ALLIANCE DEMMU [formerly known as DEMAj Downtown Edmonds Merchant Meet Up A private, non-profit organization founded in 1907 serving the community and businesses in the Edmonds area. MEMBERSHIP NETWORK: Nearly 400 members including businesses, non -profits, government and individuals. Membership is voluntary. EVENTS: Signature community events include An Edmonds Kind of 4th, Taste Edmonds, Edmonds Classic Car Show, Halloween Trick -or Treat and the Tree Lighting Ceremony, drawing as many as 50,000 attendees annually. Over 30 networking events annually connect local and regional business and community leaders. TOURISM: The Edmonds Log Cabin Visitor Center, run by Chamber staff and volunteers, serves over 1,500 visitors and tourists annually. COMMUNICATIONS AND OUTREACH: Reaching over 500,000 annually through strategic communications with social media; business directories and maps of Edmonds; and vital education, resources and events for business owners and individuals. DIRECT BUSINESS SUPPORT: Assist over 60 businesses annually with project -specific support on recruitment, retention, workforce, start-ups, marketing, key contacts and other resources. GIVING BACK: Donating over $20,000 annually to local non -profits, service groups and businesses in need through event revenue, fundraising and Edmonds Chamber Foundation grants. A Business Improvement District created to provide a local funding mechanism, whereby businesses assess themselves to fund programs. An advisory board of member business representatives and one program manager execute an annual work plan and budget approved by City Council. MEMBERSHIP NETWORK: 400+ shops, restaurants, services and office -based businesses located within the BID boundaries in Downtown Edmonds CAMPAIGNS: Edmonds Holidays; Lovin' Summer Edmonds; Love, Edmonds MARKETING & PROMOTIONS: Execute hyper -local advertising campaigns and promotions to ensure our downtown stays lively, attractive, prosperous and welcoming to everyone. Business Spotlights, feature articles, digital ads, website, social media and sponsored content in local media reach 300,000 annually. DOWNTOWN AMENITIES: Courtesy Umbrellas, After Hours Parking, Bike Racks, Creative Crosswalks An informal group of downtown merchants with a focus on information -sharing and discussion. MEMBERSHIP NETWORK: Consists of merchants and business owners in Downtown Edmonds. Open to all downtown businesses; no membership fee. PURPOSE: Strictly an information -sharing group of peers, while also keeping members updated with timely information from City Hall, Ed! and The Chamber of Commerce. Since DEMMU members are by default members of Edl, the meetings can also generate and prioritize program ideas for Edl to execute. COVID and Beyond o In it for the Long Haul ■ Strong partnership with the City and Chamber to keep downtown thriving ■ Communicated that Edmonds was open and a safe place to visit ■ Focused and consistent "live local" message to locals with articles, a strong social media presence and ads ■ Paved the way for continued success post -pandemic Carrie Hulbert, Ed! Program Manager, reviewed: • Appearance & Environmental Programs o Courtesy umbrellas o After Hours Parking Signs ■ 3locations: - Sound Credit Union - WA Federal - US Bank Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 38 Packet Pg. 55 N N uA N O w tv z to Q 7.2.a ■ Adds 50 spots downtown ■ Working on adding additional lots o "Discover Downtown" Directional Flags Communication & Outreach Programs o Member Outreach ■ Regular communication with members via Annual Meeting, Year in Review brochure, email newsletter, web page and new member information & visits o My Edmonds News Sponsored Content ■ Articles run as sponsored content 6 times per year ■ —5,000 article views annually ■ Other outreach articles also run Marketing Programs o Marketing Strategy ■ Promote Edmonds as a local and day trip destination ■ Hyper -local focus (Edmonds +10 miles) ■ Digital content, ads, and social to drive visits and keep Edmonds top of mind ■ Design & manage campaigns to drive visits ■ Program Manager drives our strategies, and we contract with a local writer and photographer to create high -quality content o EdmondsDowntown.org ■ Member business directory ■ Feature articles ■ Business Spotlights ■ Parking map ■ Edmonds info o Site Directory ■ Promote your business in the site directory ■ Category & business pages viewed over 100,000 times COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO EXTEND FOR 20 MINUTES. COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO AMEND TO EXTEND FOR 15 MINUTES. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, C4 PAINE, NAND AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS c TEITZEL AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. w Ms. Hulbert continued: _ m o Web Feature Articles E z ■ Highlight Edmonds businesses, campaigns, events and the unique qualities of downtown 0 ■ Viewed 14,300 times in last year Q ■ Innovative way to utilize compelling content to promote downtown o Business Spotlights o Advertising ■ Promoted Spotlights, Features, campaigns and services ■ Ads were seen 984,000 times in last year ■ Average link clickthrough rate of 1.45% (industry average is .9%) o Social Media ■ Instagram followers +23% ■ Facebook followers +15%. o Edmonds Holidays Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 39 Packet Pg. 56 7.2.a ■ Edmonds Holidays website ■ Holiday Trolley with Emily the Elf ■ Festive Drink Bingo ■ Ornament Stroll ■ Window Clings ■ Guest blogger articles ■ Posters & table tents ■ Holiday Buddies ■ Social Media ads & features o Lovin' Summer Edmonds ■ Window clings ■ "Discover Downtown" flags ■ Posters & table tents ■ Family Scavenger Hunt ■ Ads and website features o Love Lists ■ Love List table tents and window clings ■ Highlighted each shop's "favorite things" for Valentine's Day ■ Ads and website feature ■ My Edmonds News article o Green Edmonds ■ Highlight businesses making efforts to limit their environmental impact ■ Partnered with Edmonds Chamber, City of Edmonds ■ Chalkboards to make a green pledge ■ Green Edmonds clings Mr. Tatum reviewed: Policy a o Policy Questions & Staff Recommendations ■ Should the City bill Ed! for services? c - Staff Recommendation is no. The BID is a cooperative effort between the City and business community and designed to make the collective large than the sum of its o parts. Recouping fees is not considered the norm by other cities with BIDs. The Q $6,000-$8,000/year is minimal and within the normal duties. However, this dollar Q amount represents a large hit to the operating capability of the BID N ■ Should there be a change in policy for non-payment? N - Staff recommendation is no. The establishing ordinance set out a next and final step T for non-payment, sending the debt to collections. Businesses may fall on hard times w and may fall behind. The desire is for them to survive; a change in this rule would affect all businesses, not just the chronic non -payers. E ■ Should we change the 12% late fee? - Staff recommendation is no. It is established by ordinance and is adequate and appropriate for non-payment. Q Ms. Koenig reviewed: • Work Plan & Budget o 2023 Proposed Budget Administration Marketing Communication and Outreach Appearance & Environment TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES $89,275 $21,950 $47,145 $4,880 $15,300 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 40 Packet Pg. 57 7.2.a TOTAL BUDGETED REVENUES (incl $22,158 fund balance) $ 101,727 Comparison of 2013-2021 Budget Summary Advisory Board Meetings 0 2nd Thursday each month o Zoom and in -person at city hall COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO TAKE ALL THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ADMINISTRATION AND SAY NO TO ALL THREE POLICY ISSUES AND ACCEPT THE BUDGET AND WORK PLAN. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. With regard to protestors within the geographical BID location who refuse to pay their dues and are not considered in good standing, Councilmember Nand suggested there may be people who cannot afford the dues or are experiencing difficulty. She asked if there was an opt out or hardship exemption for those businesses. For those who seek to opt out because they view the BID as taxation without representation, she asked whether Ed! dues are considered a local tax that is deductible on federal taxes. Ms. Koenig said she was uncertain about the deductibility of Ed! dues. In the way the BID was formed, there is no option to opt out. With regard to hardship, during COVID, businesses were not sent to collections. She had not heard hardship as a reason for non-payment. Council President Olson said she has conferred with the city attorney about options to clarify legalities with the way the BID was initiated. Options include a declaratory ruling which requires other parties to the suit and costs for both parties. Another option is an attorney general advisory opinion which would be sponsored by a state representative or state senator. For most people, the attorney general advisory opinion would be a reputable outside opinion whether the BID was initiated legally. The city attorney understands the point being made by those who cite parts of the RCW about initialization, but said that read as a whole, he is confident it was initiated legally. Seeking an attorney general advisory opinion would be a no cost option to pursue. Due to the late hour, she suggested councilmembers think about whether they wanted to pursue that 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS 13. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 11:14 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 25, 2022 Page 41 Packet Pg. 58 N N In N O T W Cd E t V Q 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Approval of Council Regular Meeting Minutes of November 1, 2022 Staff Lead: Scott Passey Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Review and approve the draft meeting minutes on the Consent Agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: E110122 Packet Pg. 59 7.3.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES November 1, 2022 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Will Chen, Councilmember Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., & Human Serv. Dir. Rob English, City Engineer Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec. & Human Serv. Dir. Mike DeLilla, Senior Utilities Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5t1i Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Chen read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip o Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We a respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection Q with the land and water." C, N 3. ROLL CALL w City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. m E 4. PRESENTATIONS 1. PURPLE HEART CITY PROCLAMATION Q Mayor Nelson read a proclamation proclaiming the City of Edmonds as a Purple Heart City and encouraged all residents and businesses of Edmonds to show their appreciation for the sacrifices Purple Heart recipients have made in defending our freedoms, to acknowledge their courage, and to show them the honor and support they have earned. Mayor Nelson presented the proclamation to Drew James, Military Order of the Purple Heart Chapter 12 Seattle, and Gary Walderman, Heroes' Cafe Director. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 60 7.3.a Mr. James thanked the city council and mayor for the resolution. Edmonds is the last city in Snohomish County to declare themselves a Purple Heart City. He started this challenging task last November, to get the multiple cities in Snohomish County to declare themselves Purple Heart Cities. He is now working on cities throughout the state, beginning with cities on Highway 2 from Everett to Spokane. He will be the state commander for the Veterans of Foreign War in 2025-2026 and would like to see every city and county a Purple Heart City/County. He will add Edmond to the Purple Heart Trail tomorrow. Mr. Walderman echoed Mr. James' comments, thanking Edmonds for becoming a Purple Heart City. This honors not only the combat -wounded and those who gave the ultimate sacrifice, but those who have internal wounds that are not classified as combat wounds. Becoming a Purple Heart City also thanks them because they are suffering just like those who lost a limb or their life for our country. He asked the community to think about those individuals as well when they think about Edmonds being a Purple Heart City and when signs are installed identifying Edmonds as a Purple Heart City. He noted many cities north of Edmonds have signs identifying themselves a Purple Heart City and Purple Heart parking spaces and it will be great to see it in Edmonds. He applauded the city council and expressed appreciation for their support of veterans and veteran initiatives. 2. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS THAT RESTORED THE EDMONDS MARSH -ESTUARY AND SHELLABARGER CREEK Council President Olson recognized Joe Scordino who led this effort. She read the resolution and invited volunteers to stand as they were recognized: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, TO RECOGNIZE COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS THAT RESTORED THE EDMONDS MARSH - ESTUARY AND SHELLABARGER CREEK. WHEREAS, restoration of the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary, a unique urban tidal wetland owned by the City of Edmonds, has been a City priority for many years; and WHEREAS, in 2010, WRIA 8 (Watershed Resource Inventory Area 8) recognized the importance of the restoration of this nearshore estuary and identified it as one of their priority projects for the recovery of Puget Sound Chinook salmon that are ° listed under the Endangered Species Act; and o WHEREAS, an overgrowth of an invasive plant, bittersweet nightshade, had gone `unchecked' for many a years, thus allowing the invasive nightshade to overwhelm native wetland plants, encroach into creeks, Q and kill trees along the edges of the wetland; and WHEREAS, field data collected over five years by the Edmonds Stream Team and students from `N Edmonds-Woodway and Meadowdale High Schools demonstrated the nightshade was advancing along r the fence line and forming impenetrable thickets on the chain -link fencing thus deteriorating water w quality; blocking and altering critical water flow from Shellabarger Creek on both sides of Highway 104; and causing flooding at Dayton Street during rainstorms; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Stream Team contacted the Washington Secretary of Transportation in 2021 about the urgency of this serious and expanding problem, and requested the State allow community members permission to manually remove the chain -link fencing and embedded invasive nightshade in the Q State's right-of-way along Highway 104; and WHEREAS, the Washington Department of Transportation agreed on July 7, 2021 to grant this requested permission under their "Adopt a Highway" landscape program, resulting in a dedicated crew of community volunteers who focused their efforts on the east side of Highway 104, and were recognized by City Council Resolution 1483 in November 2021; and WHEREAS, over 50 private citizens responded to the June 2022 announcements in My Edmonds News calling for a second season of community volunteers to continue the habitat restoration efforts. During 18 work -party days this summer, this 2022 team of volunteers toiled in especially deep, wet mud to manually remove thickets of nightshade and the remainder of chain -link fencing in the wetland; and Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 61 7.3.a WHEREAS, this continued work successfully "day -lighted" (or reopened) the Shellabarger Creek channel on the west side of Highway 104, significantly re-establishing waterflow into the Edmonds Marsh - Estuary; and WHEREAS, these community volunteers proved that private citizens can work cooperatively and effectively to successfully restore the ecological functions of natural areas to benefit wildlife, `ecosystem services' (e.g., carbon sequestration, pollutant reduction), and citizens throughout the region that appreciate the preservation of functional, natural areas in the Puget Sound basin; and by extension saving the City thousands of dollars in labor, consultants and design fees. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES: The City Council of Edmonds hereby recognizes the significance of the community volunteer effort to restore and preserve the Edmonds Marsh -Estuary and Shellabarger Creek and would like to formally thank the following volunteers for their time and effort this year in achieving this important outcome for the City: Aiden Curran, Alessandra Serafini, Amelie Mederios, Andy Chin, Anna Berge, Annabelle Yenter, Barbara Ford, Benten Taing, Bernie Zavala, Bob Mooney, Bob Seidensticker, Chris Walton, Christopher Konkel, Dave Millette, Diane Buckshnis, Elizabeth Fleming, Evan Grey, Greg Ferguson, Isis Liaw, Jane O'Dell, Joe Scordino (Project Leader), John Brock, Joshua Ly, Kai Rosman, Karen Andres, Kathy Jones, Kenneth Schultz, Lars Andres, Laszlo Rosman, Lorraine Monroe, Lucia Brady, Makana Apio, Maria Metler, Marjie Fields, Matthew Jack, Nancy Scordino, Nathan Zeon, Noah Croskey, Piper Hanson, Russel Jack, Scot Simpson, Selena Bolotin, Tauri Senn, Teresa Schultz, Valerie Rosman, Vance Ekrem, Vivian Olson, Waylisha Grey, and Yvette Osai. Mr. Scordino thanked the council for the recognition and acknowledgement and thanked all the volunteers, commenting he was amazed at the volunteers' resilience and the joy in their faces as they opened up the creek. He noted the State Secretary of Transportation sent individual letters to each volunteer to thank them. 5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO ADD A NEW ITEM, 10.1 CITY ATTORNEY CODE — REVISIONS TO 2.05 ECC. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. i COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO c RENUMBER ITEM 10.2, PRESENTATION ON 2023-2028 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, TO 10.3 AND ADD AS 10.2, COUNCIL APPROVAL w FOR CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT TASK FORCE TO WORK DIRECTLY WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY. E t Councilmember Buckshnis asked Councilmember Teitzel to restate the motion, commenting she was confused about the intent. Q Councilmember Teitzel explained the rationale was to avoid giving anyone the misimpression that the task force is negotiating on behalf of the council without the council's express approval. This will include the discussion of potential terms and changes to terms that may be acceptable to council. The changes will be provided to council in a redline form for approval. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 62 7.3.a 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Mayor Nelson described procedures for in -person audience comments. Elizabeth Fleming, Edmonds, spoke regarding the September 29" gun threat lockdown at Edmonds Woodway High School and her concerns after learning the details of that situation. She realized this was not city council business, but the safety of children was of huge importance to all. She relayed her concerns with the Edmonds School District's complete disregard for student safety by not having clear and effective protocols in place to deal with gun threats, which she found unacceptable. Thankfully and quite miraculously, the worst outcome did not transpire and put Edmonds in the national news. The more than 20,000 students who attend schools in the ESD were put at serious risk because the newly implemented gun threat policy put in after the EWHS incident was not put in place earlier. In addition, the decision by Principal Allison Larsen to delay response for two hours was nothing short of negligence, CN & showing poor judgment and was inexcusable. She questioned the district's lack of knowledge of why the camm student had an ankle bracelet and why the district would accept a student wearing an ankle bracelet r without fully knowledge of the situation. The student who brought the gun to school had two outstanding arrest warrants for first degree armed robbery in King County, but elected officials were unaware of the E danger imposed on the community and the students. The next ESD meeting is scheduled for November 8'' o and she encouraged parents, students, and non -parents to join to share their voices to demand z accountability of the district and Principal Larsen for this incident and the way it was handled. She r encouraged the city council and the mayor to provide input into the situation, commenting the community n should know more at this point. Guns are dangerous, but it is not just guns, the proper protocols need to be in place to manage situations. Thankfully better protocols are now in place, but she found it unbelievable and upsetting that students were put in that situation and it is lucky that nothing worse happened. L Jim Ogonowski, Edmonds, referred to the CFP/CIP, agreeing with Planning Board Member Gladstone's 3 remarks (at the earlier special meeting) regarding her vote on the CFP/CIP that it did not seem imaginative enough. With regard to sidewalks, there is nothing in the 2023, 2024 or 2025 budget for sidewalks and it is not until 2026 that there is any funding for sidewalks. He attended all of Director ° McLaughlin's visioning exercises and continuously hears citizens ask for sidewalks and did not hear o much about bicycle lanes, yet there is $2.8 million in 2023 for bike lanes and nothing for sidewalks. He a recommended splitting that amount and putting half toward sidewalks and half toward bike lanes. Next, Q he expressed concern with the progress on the wastewater treatment plan (WWTP), as it should have been N completed by now. The budget doesn't include any funds for construction and he was curious whether N that project was on budget and how much was being carried over into future years. He envisioned the startup phase for the WWTP will be the most difficult part for the new technology. The council needs that w insight when budgeting for 2023. With regard to the green street initiative, he understood the value of green streets and kind of applauded it, but his approach toward implementation would be different; he m would target Highway 99 for the green street initiative versus downtown and get the state involved. If it is that good of an idea, the state should be on board. The Highway 99 project includes the median and M sidewalks so green streets could easily be added and it could be a learning experience before Q implementing it elsewhere in the City. Joe Scordino, Edmonds, referred to the overall budget process and how the council gets to this point every year. It always seems like everyone is in such a hurry to look at budget proposals and new CFP/CIP projects that no one knows whether they will be done. He requested this process begin earlier, like in July, to identify problems and get people who have knowledge of the problem together and then develop a budget initiative instead of everyone reacting and saying no. A good example is the project on SR-104, everyone told him there was no way WSDOT would allow him to remove the fence. He soon learned that nobody went to WSDOT to tell them the fence was a problem and ask to work together to remove the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 63 fence. WSDOT told him sure, have at it. He suggested doing the same with other issues in Edmonds. He referred to a problem in Yost Park where the creek is eroding a hillside due to historic structures and suggested getting the people who are interested in preserving historic structures together in advance to figure out a solution to the problem and then propose a budget initiative to fix the problem. Instead there is a last minute proposal to do an assessment. He urged the council to embark on this process earlier and work toward a final budget after having open public discussions and getting people involved. 7. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM THE OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT 8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. Councilmember Teitzel requested Items 8.6 and 8.7 be removed from the consent agenda for further discussion. Councilmember Buckshnis requested Item 8.9 be removed from the consent agenda so she could vote against it. Council President Olson requested Item 8.8 be removed from the consent agenda so she could offer an amendment. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 14, 2022 2. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS 3. AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT WITH JAMES G. MURPHY TO SELL SURPLUS CITY EQUIPMENT 4. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS THAT RESTORED THE EDMONDS MARSH -ESTUARY AND SHELLABARGER CREEK N 0 5. EMPLOYEE EXPENSES, VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION, AND REIMBURSEMENTS POLICY w c ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT m E t 6. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN/RIGHT OF WAY PHASES OF HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT -STAGE 3 Q 7. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN/RIGHT OF WAY PHASES OF HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 4 Councilmember Teitzel advised this is related to Stages 3 and 4 of the Highway 99 Revitalization Project which include a scope of work related to potential undergrounding of overhead utilities. The cost of that work in stage 3 is $183,000 and $235,900 in phase 4, a total of over $400,000 in taxpayer money devoted to that assessment in these two phases which does not include other future phases. The costs he cited are Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 64 7.3.a related only to the assessment of undergrounding, not construction. He did not support undergrounding utilities anywhere in Edmonds in the current environment due to the cost. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO REMOVE THE POTENTIAL UNDERGROUNDING STUDY FOR OVERHEAD FACILITIES FROM THE SCOPE OF WORK. Councilmember Paine did not support removing the opportunity to have design work done for undergrounding aboveground utilities. Undergrounding in these sections and along the entire length of Highway 99 allows for planting big trees. Big trees are easier to maintain although the first few years are difficult. Planting big trees along the sidewalk and in the median mitigate climate change and offer beauty to an area that has been neglected and they would not be impacted by aboveground utilities. She remarked as one drives north on Highway 99 toward Edmonds, it looks like 1950. This effort is needed and it is owed to the community who live in the areas as well as drivers on Highway 99 entering Edmonds. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed the city owes it to citizens on Highway 99 which is why the council is requiring an SEIS which she wanted done sooner rather than later. She is a fiscal conservative, and looks after the taxpayers' money. Undergrounding is a wonderful want, but it is not a need and it is very expensive, especially with the economy moving into a recession and with supply chain issues. She expressed her full support for the motion. Councilmember Tibbott said he is also a fiscal conservative, but he is mindful that future generations will thank the council for undergrounding utilities. There will never be a time in the city's history when it will be less expensive than it is now when work is being done on Highway 99. For the sake of future generations and the prosperity of that area, he supports investigating what it will take to underground the utilities. He referred to wires that crisscross Highway 99 east to west, commenting they are very unsightly and potentially detrimental to the future of that corridor. He did not support the motion. Councilmember Nand understood Councilmembers Teitzel and Buckshnis' points about being careful about utilizing taxpayers' resources especially now when people are worried about filling their gas tanks. However, it should be considered whether now is a good time to underground and devote $400,000 to that ° effort. This could be a good opportunity to add resiliency to the grid. Windstorms are hitting the area with o more frequency in the winter, resulting in 2-3 day blackouts which could be very dangerous for people a with disabilities, the homebound and for seniors. She recognized undergrounding on Highway 99 would Q not solve those problems for the entire city, but it could be a policy moving forward so that Edmonds did not find itself in the position of municipalities in California and Texas who have rolling blackouts due to N the vulnerability of their overhead electric wires. It is also dangerous to public utility workers and to r citizens when wires come down. She agreed this could be considered a want and not a need, but for the w resiliency of the grid for generations to come, this could be an important first step. m Councilmember Teitzel referred to the comment tonight about the need to increase the quality and z quantity of sidewalks in the City. This is a good preview of the upcoming budget discussions with regard to where to deploy scarce taxpayer resources. He is a fan of undergrounding, aesthetically it is much more Q beautiful than overhead wires; however, the City needs many more miles of sidewalks and more parks especial in the Highway 99 corridor. If he was asked for a tradeoff in terms of a need versus a want, the City needs more sidewalks and more park space for the growing population, the undergrounding of overhead utilities is not a need. Councilmember Chen said he is also a financial conservative, however, the Highway 99 revitalization is a once in a lifetime opportunity, and if it is missed, there will not be another opportunity for 50-100 years. Although he agrees sidewalks and other amenities are needed in the Highway 99 corridor, this is an opportunity the City cannot miss. It will provide the necessary space for taller trees. Highway 99 has a lot Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 6 Packet Pg. 65 7.3.a of pavement although the center medians provide some improvement. This is an opportunity he was willing to invest in. Council President Olson recalled at the committee level, something was added so the undergrounding design would come back to council early in the process for council input. City Engineer Rob English explained after the feasibility Councilmember Teitzel referred to was complete, a presentation would be made to council regarding the estimated cost of undergrounding and there would be a decision point at that stage whether to move forward with the remaining design work and right-of-way acquisition to set it up for construction. Council President Olson said with that in mind, she agreed it was a want, but it is a really strong want for her for some of the reasons other councilmembers have expressed. Councilmember Paine asked Mr. English to confirm her understanding these are not General Fund dollars, but funds dedicated to capital and roadway projects. Mr. English responded on these two stages, the bulk of the funding is from state's transportation programs Move Ahead Washington and Connecting Washington, so the funds cannot be moved to sidewalk projects in other areas of the City. Two competitive federal grants were secured based on project components which also could not be moved to other projects. There are also impact fees associated with the project for stage 4 due to the 200t'/Highway 99 level of service issue and those funds cannot be used for sidewalk projects. There is a small amount of REET funds matching some of those grants which would be the only funds that could be moved to sidewalk projects. Councilmember Paine recalled Director McLaughlin indicating that transportation dollars do not fund sidewalks, that would be a multimodal transportation methodology that is not in place yet due to state regulations. Mr. English observed Councilmember Paine was referring to traffic impact fees which are built on intersection vehicle capacity level of service. The City's transportation plan would potentially look at sidewalk or bike lane level of service but that LOS is not currently considered. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the Highway 99 Gateway project is $38 million. She asked if staff had an idea of cost of undergrounding because she did not see it in the CFP as it had not been figured out M yet. Mr. English said estimates were prepared when the corridor analysis was done. The estimated cost of o full design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction for stage 3 is approximately $9 million and $13.1 a million for stage 4. Councilmember Buckshnis said now that she has listened to other councilmembers' Q comments, she agreed, recalling the Banfield Freeway in the early 70s rather than going up Division N Street. She agreed this may be an opportunity the City may never have again. She pointed out there are 8- `" 9 phases of this project. Mr. English agreed the corridor is broken into several segments, these are contracts for stages 3 and 4. The conceptual estimate is $33 million for stage 3; out of that, $9 million is w associated with right-of-way, design and construction and the conceptual estimate for stage 4 is $42.6 million, of that $13.1 million is associated with full design, right-of-way acquisition and construction. E z Councilmember Buckshnis commented if undergrounding is done in stages 3 and 4, it will need to be M done throughout. Mr. English agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis observed there were no estimates for Q undergrounding in future phases. Mr. English did not have the estimate for the full corridor. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if federal funds through the Infrastructure Bill could be used. Mr. English agreed that funding source was a potential opportunity. It will require work at the federal level to get Edmonds' name and the project recognized. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the City already got one award, and possibly could get another; the award shows the City is doing the right thing. Mr. English explained the two awards the City received through the federal process were through the Snohomish County Infrastructure Coordination Committee and are smaller grants. Construction grants are much larger; staff will continue to pursue funding at both the state and federal levels as opportunities exist. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 7 Packet Pg. 66 7.3.a At Mayor Nelson's request, Councilmember Teitzel restated the motion FOR STAGES 3 AND 4, TO PULL THE SCOPE OF WORK ITEM RELATED TO POTENTIAL UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (1-6), COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND NAND AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING NO. 9. DEPARTMENTAL NAME CHANGE Councilmember Buckshnis said this came to the Public Safety, Planning, Human Services & Personnel Committee and should have come through the Finance Committee. The proposal is to change Development Services to Planning & Development. A google search showed planning in many development services departments, therefore she felt it was an unnecessary change that will cost the taxpayers money. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE THE DEPARTMENTAL NAME CHANGE. Council President Olson said the costs will be nominal. She suggested staff continue to use their current business cards until they need more. Most of the changes will be digital and she saw value in adding planning to the department name. Mayor Nelson assured the intent is for staff to use up their existing cards. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT, PAINE AND NAND AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. 8. ASSOCIATE PLANNER JOB DESCRIPTION CHANGE TO ASSOCIATE TRANSPORTATION PLANNER Council President Olson requested the following revision: • Line 3 under position purpose, replace "to reach our Climate Action Goals" with "in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan and Climate Action Goals adopted by Council." COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, N TO REVISE THE JOB DESCRIPTION AS STATED. cN 0 r Council President Olson explained the intent was to be clear that codes would be initiated by policy w created by council. At City Attorney Jeff Taraday's request, she repeated the proposed change. m MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER PAINE VOTING NO. t COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, Q TO APPROVE THE ASSOCIATE TRANSPORTATION PLANNER JOB DESCRIPTION AS AMENDED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN/RIGHT OF WAY PHASES OF HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT -STAGE 3 AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN/RIGHT OF WAY PHASES OF HIGHWAY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT -STAGE STAGE 4. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL VOTING NO Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 8 Packet Pg. 67 7.3.a 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PRESENTATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ON REVENUE SOURCES Administrative Services Director Dave Turley explained the City is required to have a revenue presentation and public hearing and the property tax presentation and public hearing. There is a budget public hearing tonight and another in a couple weeks; the City is not required to have a budget public hearing tonight but wanted to give the public an extra opportunity. With regard to questions he has heard about why the council was having so many public hearings on one night, the alternative was to have two tonight and one in two weeks, but the intent was to give the public an extra opportunity for another public hearing on the budget. He reviewed: • Why are we having this presentation tonight? o RCW 35.33.057 States that "Prior to the final hearing on the budget, the legislative body or a committee thereof, shall schedule hearings on the budget or parts thereof' • What is the purpose? o When putting a budget together, we start with understanding our revenues. One purpose of this presentation is to help you understand City revenues to help us make expenditure decisions, another is to give you context later this evening when you decide whether to increase our property tax levy by 1%. o For both this and the property tax agenda item, tonight is an opportunity to hear comments from the public and for council to discuss whether to adjust our Property Tax Levy for next year. • Budget Priorities / Highlights o What is in the Proposed Budget, in addition to ongoing city services? ■ Significant Increase in Public Safety — In this budget the Mayor is proposing to invest an additional $3 million in our Police Department. Included are creating a new patrol district, adding a community storefront officer, two problem solving detectives, and more police cars and other needed equipment. ■ Neighborhood Improvements — Approximately $2.7 million in improvements to City parks, $1 million reserved for Open Space acquisition, investments in Green Streets, providing grants to improve blighted property in our neighborhoods, and spending to help address the climate crisis. ■ Highway 99 Community Investments — the first stage of rebuilding Highway 99 is scheduled to be completed this spring, and additional investments reflect our commitment to this area. ■ ARPA Funds — Year 3 of — $11 million in federal funds that will be invested in improving the services that the City delivers to residents, as well as helping individual Edmonds businesses, individuals, and our environment. • General Fund Revenue Sources - $49.6 million ane, • Citywide Revenues by Fund Type - $111.4 million Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 9 Packet Pg. 68 N N 0 w c m E z Q 7.3.a City revenue 35,000.000 30,000A00 16,000.000 S,ODOAoo III NEI and Fleer andrt sew�rau�ee rune. unlnrnai servi�n Eundsl oil MEN ON — Ed Phl Fl, scue Street Lons[ruetion Aree[Malntenanre ParNS Lonstru.tion Plan nnd ■11 REET Le. N xry reoeht ' .zw3an d .mz —.1— .m 1Pmo . o General Fund ■ High in 2021 due to bonds sold for parks and building maintenance ■ High in 2023 due to ARPA funds o Water, Storm and Sewer related funds ■ High in 2021 due to bonds sold for the incinerator project at the WWTP. ■ High in 2022 due to revenue from partner cities as project is constructed o Fleet and IT ■ 2023 higher due to ARPA funds to purchase several police cars o Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund ■ City received $6 million 2021 and in 2022 o Street Construction ■ High in 2022 due to grant funds for Hwy 99 o Street Maintenance ■ Consistent year-to-year o Parks Construction ■ High in 2021 and 2022 due to bond sold, donations, grant funds for Civic Field o REET ■ High in 2022 and 2023 due to increased REET funds o Other Special Revenue & Debt Service ■ High in 2021 due to bond refunding General Fund Tax Revenue (2016 — 2021) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 10 Packet Pg. 69 N N 0 w c m E z Q 7.3.a 12,000,000 10,000,000 3,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 • General Fund Revenues o These have been relatively consistent over the last several years o This stability helps when making a 2023 forecast General Fund Revenues- 3.496 Increase Per Year on Average ' sso,oao.00a s,.s,00a.000 sw.00a.000 s3s,000.000 sao,000,000 ixs,oao,00a So,000,00a vs,00n,000 So,000,aoa 5s,000,aoo 5- �sF ne.eeees wenouxrresfe.s-ice �ranz+ers-m • General Fund Revenues o About 72% of GF revenues are made up of Property Taxes and Sales Taxes o Property Taxes — very predictable and consistent — but little increase, even during periods of inflation o Sales Taxes — unpredictable and more volatile srel lan ", 151% • General Fund Revenues — Other (-28%) o These are things like charges for services, fines and penalties, grants, and other misc. ■ Planning & Development — Building permits and related fees ■ Parks & Recreation — Program fees for things like classes o Outside Revenues — Agreements with Woodway and Edmonds School District, Distributions from the State (e.g. liquor and marijuana taxes) o — 90 revenue line items in total • General Fund Revenues — Property Taxes (-33%) o Very predictable and consistent, BUT, lag behind during inflationary periods (Presentation to follow later this evening) • General Fund Revenues — Sales Tax (-39%) o Retail Sales Tax — 25% o Other Sales Taxes (Utilities, Criminal Justice, Leasehold) — 14% Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 11 Packet Pg. 70 N N O r W c m E z Q 7.3.a 2021 Sales and Use Fax 11.UW.WO ia.00W.coo ' Y.WU.OW &DOO.000 7.000.ODU C 000AW 5-(XW,(11]I] 4,000.000 3.WGWU 4000-000 ax M 0 LAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DIK -C.Y- Yeu -And� t Pdoi Y"ea Sales and i.-se Tax rpoW.oaa �.W0.UW �DOQ DOW 1,f1[I(I,flflfl �000.000 L000.W0(I i,Woo.aoo ?.000.000 �.000.aaW 1.000.000 n S.xN lilt MAIt :APR h7nY .i[TN Ilff. :11 JC 4FP [1CT NlIV f7hT. �Cune.0 Ye ar -Budger _Priur Year Real Estate Excise Tax (BEET) o A significant revenue source that can help to alleviate pressure on the General Fund o (BEET does not affect most households in a given year) o BEET Revenue ■ 2019 Actual $3,096,440 ■ 2020 Actual $3,653,320 ■ 2021 Actual $4,753,384 ■ 2022 Projected $4,000,000 ■ 2023 Budgeted $4,400,000 General Fund Revenues and Budget Planning o What you need to know: ■ ARPA — we have received significant ARPA money and are proposing to use that money to make significant investments in public safety, neighborhood improvements, and to positively impact our climate and our local environment. ■ Forecasting —Our actual results have fallen in line with projections that we have made. ■ Trends —Our revenues remain strong, and we foresee continued growth in Sales Taxes and BEET compared to historical numbers. ■ Stimulus Packages —Nationally and locally, federal government stimulus packages are having a positive impact on keeping the economy going. ■ Budget for 2023 —Forecasting the future is always problematic. Will we have continued inflation? A recession? Will our local economy remain strong? We will continue to monitor the economic environment during the coming years and make adjustments along the way. Next Steps o Next on the agenda is a public hearing on revenue sources: 1. Open public hearing 2. Accept comments 3. Close public hearing o This is a presentation only, no action is asked for this evening. Its purpose is to inform council and the public and to help council make budgetary decisions later. Councilmember Tibbott referred to the General Fund Tax Revenue (2016 — 2021) graph, noting the EMS levy remains the same every year. He asked about the trend for expenses in that category. Mr. Turley said the EMS Levy is supposed to support fire and EMS, those costs have increased 10%/year and the EMS levy increases slightly more than 1 %/year. The City's fire contract is approximately $10-11 million and the EMS levy generates about $4.5 million and increases very slowly. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the finance committee talked about illusive trending for the next year. As part of the fund balance policy, the committee will look at trends. She watches Opening Bell every Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 12 Packet Pg. 71 N N 0 w c m E z Q 7.3.a day; some people believe the economy is in recession now and some don't. It will be difficult in the future to match ongoing expenses created via the new jobs with the revenue sources. She would like to source the stable revenue with ongoing expenses. Councilmember Nand commented with early federal stimulus in response to the pandemic such as the CARES Act, the City was able to do more direct granting to people in Edmonds who were financially struggling such as through the Wellspring program that provided direct grants to people in danger of losing their housing due to job market instability. In looking at the legislative intent of ARPA, it is a form of stimulus in which the City was expected to provide economic and market strength as a market participant versus more direct granting. She asked whether it was contemplated in the 2023 budget that the City would use federal funds, either CARES or ARPA or other stimulus package in response to the pandemic, to provide direct economic relief to people in Edmonds who are struggling. Mr. Turley recommended separating CARES funds and the ARPA money. The City received about $2 million in CARES funds in the summer of 2020 and it had to be spent by yearend. At that point, a lot of people were out of work, their businesses were closed, and the economic situation was dire. The City spent a large portion or nearly all the $2 million directly to those hit hardest by the pandemic and who were in the greatest need. Mr. Turley continued, the ARPA money is different; it is intended for the City to be a market participant in the economy. The intent of the ARPA money is spending on lost revenues, things the City would typically spend General Fund on such as police and fire protection, and infrastructure. As a percentage, approximately 90% of the CARES money was distributed directly to individuals and businesses. The vast majority of the ARPA money will not be distributed to individuals and businesses because unemployment is low, the economy is on its feet so that need does not exist as much. There are funds earmarked in ARPA funds for low income help and educational assistance at Edmonds College and Shoreline College for Edmonds residents. One of the other differences between the CARES funds and the ARPA funds is the City has six years to spent ARPA funds. Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing. Jim Ogonowski, Edmonds, referred to the graph of City revenue budgets compared to previous years, commenting the General Fund and Water, Storm and Sewer related funds were very similar amounts, yet o there is more focus on the General Fund in the revenue discussions. There is typically a very robust a discussion about utility rate increases, but there has not yet been any discussion about the rate increases Q imbedded in the Utility fund decision packages. Utility rate increases affect everybody, unlike REET N CN which affects very few people. Not only has he not seen anything on the extended agenda about a discussion about the utility rate, but there has also been no discussion about a study to propose new utility rates. The last rate increase was last year. He found it disturbing that utility rate increases were imbedded w in the decision packages but there were no plans for a utility rate study. m E Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing. 2. PRESENTATION AND PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPERTY TAXES Q Administrative Services Director Dave Turley reviewed: • Why are we having this presentation tonight? o RCW 84.55.120 States that we must "hold a public hearing on revenue sources for the district's following year's current expense budget." (General Fund) • What is the purpose? o In our case, Property Taxes make up about 33% of GF budget. One significant purpose of this presentation is to give you context when you decide whether to increase our property tax levies by 1 %. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 13 Packet Pg. 72 7.3.a o A complete and detailed view of revenues and expenses, and fund balances, are included in the Mayor's Proposed Budget. Introduction: o Washington State property tax laws are among the most complicated in the entire country. o There are many sources if you would like more details on the intricacies of Washington State property tax laws. ■ One very good, concise description can be found at hqp://mrsc.or Home/Explore- Topics/Finance/Revenues/The-Property-Tax-in-Washington-State.aspx. ■ Another useful resource is the Snohomish County Assessor's 2022 annual report What would be the estimated annual impact per household on increasing the 2023 levy? How much revenue are we estimated to have lost over the last 4 years? Regular Le 1% $106,232 Number of households $17,845 Total $5.95 EMS Le 1% $42.319 # of households $17,845 Total $2.37 Total annual increase with a 1% increase in the regular levy and EMS levy Regular $5.95 EMS $2.37 Total $8.32 o Our banked capacity is $418,777, which results from not taking the full 1% allowable for the last four years. This is the amount that Council could still levy if it wished. o However, the revenue we would have received over those four years is more than the $418,777, because we have lost the incremental effect of taking the full 1% each year. The lost revenue is higher, between $500,000 and $1 million. How do we compare to other cities in Snohomish County? o 2022 Tvnical Lew Rate for Cities in Snohomish County ss.unno Se.0000 s�-Duna s6 0000 ss.nrmn Sa.uuno s3.nnnn sz.nrmn si.nrmn Property Taxes make up about $16.3 million, or 33% of the General Fund budget o General Fund Revenue Sources - $49.6 million Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 14 Packet Pg. 73 Q 7.3.a 191 Property Taxes that go to the City of Edmonds make up only paid by the typical Edmonds homeowner (this was 11.2% Property Taxes Levies 2014-2022 10.3% of the Property Tax bill last year and 14.6% the year o Data from the 2021 Annual Financial Report, page 161 a a� Total Amount Levied Levy % Increase O $2s,oao,aoo a o% M O L $13,00�,000 2.0% Q Q I -a% $12.000.00a � $ll,onn,000 N s.o% ry ti ry 9 ry ry N $J¢ r $io,o0o,000 1 a% oryry G LLI o The Ci 's tax le may only increase u to 1 % per year except for 1 tapping banked m tY �'Y Y Y P P Y p ) PP g E capacity or 2) approving an excess levy or a levy lid lift. o In 2014-2016 the City levied extra money to pay for debt service on the Public Safety Q Building. Property Taxes Decision for tonight: Does Council wish to increase either the Regular Property Tax Levy or the EMS Levy by 1 % over last year? (Amounts provided by the Snohomish County Assessor's Office) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 15 Packet Pg. 74 7.3.a Rcgu la r Pro peny Tax Regula r Prope rry Tax w ith with 0% 1% Amount levied last yea r lFrom 5nohomish Co unty Letterl $ ]0,623,1fi8 $ 10,6231253 Add 1% 106, 232 Add New Camtruction (From Snohomish County Letter) 49,399 49,399 Refunds a nd Other Assessor Adjust— nts 3,006 8,006 E ST I MATE ❑ Levy for 2023 Levy Reque st $ 10,600,573 $ 10,796,805 S 10,69o,0o0 $ 10,790900 EMS Property Tax EMS Pmpeny Taxwith with 0% 1% Amount levied last year $ 4,231,896 $ 4,231,M6 Add 1% 42,319 Add New Ca nstruction 19,679 19,679 Refunds and Other Assessor Adjust—nrs 3,1189 3,089 ESTIMAT E❑Levy for 2023 Levy Request $ 4,254,654 $ 4,296,973 $ 4,260,000 $ 4,300,000 Revenue from the Current Expense Levy (Regular Property Tax Levy) is unrestricted, it can be spent on anything. Revenue from the EMS property Tax Levy can be used only for emergency medical care or emergency medical services — in our case it supports our Fire District contract. Ranked capacity for the Regular Levy exists in the amount of $418,777. Next Steps o Next on the agenda is a public hearing on Property Taxes: 1. Open Public Hearing 2. Accept comments 3. Close Public Hearing o After the Public Hearing, council needs to discuss the alternatives and decide on 1% or 0% increases on both the Regular and EMS levies. Then we will prepare an ordinance reflecting the decision arrived at tonight and place it on next week's consent agenda. o Action Needed: ■ Motion to approve a 0% or 1% increase to the Current Expense (Regular) Levy, and a second motion to approve a 0% or 1 % increase to the EMS Levy. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the council has only approved a 1% increase once or twice since she has been on council. She asked how many years the City can bank capacity. Mr. Turley answered the current $418,000 is from the last four years when the City has not taken the full 1%. He was unsure if there was a time limit. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said he would need to research it to be certain, but his recollection was the banked capacity did not expire and remains until it was needed. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the council could forgive past banked capacity. Mr. Turley said N he did not think the county assessor would allow that. Property tax laws are amazingly complicated. The o $418,000 in banked capacity does not exactly represent the money the City did not collect over the four w years. It is calculated by going back to 1985 and calculating what the highest possible levy for Edmonds could have been since that time and then City is allowed to increase 1% of that highest levy. The only reason that matters is in times of deflation or when the City gets to its limit, the City can only assess $3.50 E z per 1000, so if the levy gets higher, the City can lose the banked capacity because the levy maximum has been reached. A city can lose its banked capacity if it tries to exceed the total allowable levy which would Q occur if assessed values for the entire region suddenly depressed. With regard to banking capacity, Councilmember Teitzel asked if the City decided to forego the 1% increase for four years, the City could potentially take a 5% increase by taking advantage of the banked capacity for the last four years plus 1% in the fifth year. Mr. Turley said the $418,000 does not exactly represent 1% each year. That calculation is redone every year and is effected by refunds, new construction, and the overall assessed value. What Councilmember Teitzel said was close to accurate, but the increase would not be 5% and build on the next year, the increase would be 1% plus the $418,000 and then the increase the next year would start at the lower amount, not the amount including the $418,000. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 16 Packet Pg. 75 Councilmember Teitzel commented the City is doing very well financially for various reasons, sales tax and BEET revenues are significantly higher than forecast plus the City is receiving ARPA infusions. By comparison to those millions of dollars, a 1% property tax increase would generate $106,232 which is a tiny fraction of the City's financial position. With that in mind, he did not support approving a 1% property tax increase. The optics right now are very bad, people are worried about the economy and view property tax as a regressive tax. Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing. Jim Ogonowski, Edmonds, suggested before voting, the council consider whether a tax increase is a want or a need. It seems like the property tax increase is out of sequence as the council should first get through the budget to see what is needed and if the revenues exclusive of any tax increase cover the need and if it doesn't, the council could entertain a tax increase. He found it premature for the council to vote on a property tax increase today. He questioned whether the 1% was on the dollar amount or on the levy rate; to his reading, it was 1% on the levy rate. He has not seen any information or heard any discussion about whether to increase the EMS levy. Elizabeth Fleming, Edmonds, urged the council to take a very fiscally conservative approach to budgeting this year. With regard to property tax, she pointed out property valuations have increased astronomically, close to 23% in Snohomish County for 2023, on top of a 27% valuation increase from 2021 to 2022 according to the assessor's office. A 1% increase is only a drop in the budget, but has a bad look as people are struggling with inflation pressure such as when buying groceries. She feels that pressure although she is in a very favorable financial position and can't imagine what if must feel like to people living paycheck to paycheck. With increased gas prices and the unstable and unpredictable economy, a 1% increase is juice that is not worth the squeeze. She urged the council not to approve a 1% property tax increase and to trim the fat from the budget. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO APPROVE A 0% INCREASE TO THE CURRENT EXPENSE REGULAR LEVY. Council President Olson commented in a year with one-time monies, this was a time the council could a avoid going to the taxpayers for more when the City got the taxpayers' money through the federal Q government. She supported a 0% increase. N N Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the 0% increase include banking it. Councilmember Paine said her motion was strictly a 0% increase. W c COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, m TO BANK THE 1%. t 0 M Councilmember Chen expressed support for a 0% increase for the reasons stated earlier such as sufficient Q one-time funding and the City's strong financial position. He assumed the 1% would automatically be banked for the future, so he will support the amendment Councilmember Nand thanked Mr. Turley for an excellent presentation and explanation of very complicated property tax laws in Washington State and for pointing taxpayers to the Snohomish County Assessor's report. Taxpayers are frustrated with skyrocketing assessments. Edmonds' location on the I-5 corridor, one of the hottest real estate markets in the world, seems to be completely divorced from the cost of living pressures people are experiencing due to global supply chain issues, increased gas prices, the war in Ukraine, etc. There is a lot of financial anxiety in the City, especially people who bought property Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 76 7.3.a decades ago and have seen their property taxes increase to the point where a total of $8/year may not seem very much, but it seems like a lot in an accumulative view. The City has great new revenues sources including ARPA funds which supplement what the council could ask from taxpayers. She agreed a 0% increase and banking for a year would be appropriate. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE A 1% INCREASE TO THE EMS LEVY. Councilmember Paine described her support for a 1% increase in the EMS levy was due to the $1.5 million increase in EMS services that the council approved. The 1% increase is an appropriate way to supplement the EMS budget. It is a small amount but it is all to the good. Councilmember Tibbott concurred with Councilmember Paine's comment, pointing the EMS levy is a very specific tax that supports EMS services. Councilmember Chen expressed support for the motion due to the $1.5 million increase in fire/EMS services last year. Public safety is his #1 priority and he supports this increase to fund it. Council President Olson said although she understand the points made by her colleagues regarding the $1.5 million increase in EMS funding last year, due of the City's receipt of ARPA funds, she will vote against this tax increase, feeling the city has the funds elsewhere. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL, CHEN, TIBBOTT, BUCKSHNIS AND PAINE VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBER NAND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING NO. Mr. Turley advised the ordinances will be on next week's consent agenda. Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. 3. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2023 PROPOSED BUDGET N Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing, advising there would be another public hearing on the budget in o the future. r w Jim Ogonowski, Edmonds, commented as always, the budget is an interesting and contentious process. He wondered what the City did not accomplish in 2022 that was expected to be accomplished, what was E being carried forward into 2023 and suggested that be more visible in the proposed 2023 budget. He was most concerned about the impact of the proposed budget on the forecast for future years. Unrestricted reserves decline from $9 million in 2021 to $111,000 in 2026, which seems like a steep decline. Q Decisions the council makes now will affect the rate of that decline. At this rate, the council will be faced with increasing taxes to sustain that forecast. He understood forecasts were tricky, but as staff indicated, forecasts have been fairly accurate in recent years. The amount that the City's spending dips into reserves should concern everyone, particularly in these inflationary times. Many citizens are apprehensive and cautious right now and are concerned with going into the reserves as much as the proposed budget envisions. He expressed support for budgeting by priorities; having departments prioritize their asks and identifying needs versus wants would be easier for everyone to see and appreciate where the City is going in the future. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 18 Packet Pg. 77 Jay Grant, Edmonds, echoed Mr. Ogonowski's comments, urging fiscal prudence and ensuring the City has it's priorities correct. He did not like dipping into the reserves. The City is doing okay financially and revenues have been good, but there have been challenges in the past when was nice to have money in the bank. He is a strong proponent of public safety and suggested looking hard at added spending that will have to be maintained. Just because the City has the money, he did not believe it had to be spent. Elizabeth Fleming, Edmonds, agreed with the previous speakers, recommending the council be fiscally responsible and conservative this year. A lot of community members are concerned about safety and public safety is obviously a huge area of concern and she supported the proposed increases in the police department. Infrastructure is always top of mind including how to maintain growth in housing and population and have the infrastructure to support it. The Highway 99 revitalization is part of that as well as addressing stormwater and wastewater management issues due to the City's older infrastructure. It is important to her that the government not grow any larger than it is. She has heard there are staffing challenges within the City and suggested sharpening the pencil before adding more overhead related to labor and government growth. In looking at the $8 million increase in expenses in the 2023 budget and only $3 million increase in revenue, the magic number seems to be $5 million. She lives in the Gateway District of Highway 99; car dealerships are one of the biggest sources of sales tax and protecting that is very important. She was hopeful the hotel situation in that area would be good, but knew it was a concern for the community. She referred to the effort to require drug rehabilitation for people entering the hotel which the Snohomish County Council did not approve. She urged the council to prioritize and be fiscally conservative. Hearing no further public comment, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing. 10. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. CITY ATTORNEY CODE - REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 2.05 ECC City Attorney Jeff Taraday advised the council was deliberating on this when the special meeting prior to this meeting ended. Councilmember Teitzel recalled he was in the process of raising a concern when the special meeting o ended. Rather than a point of order, he should have expressed his concern via an objection. a Councilmember Nand was suggesting that Mr. Taraday do more work on defining what exercise Q discretion means in terms of the city prosecutor; his concern and the reason he objected was this was N asking Mr. Taraday to codify a policy issue, a policy issue by the council for a contracted attorney or the N mayor for an in-house attorney. If the prosecutor is not behaving in a manner that matches what the r citizens want, the council has the discretion to terminate that employee, a decision in the council's hands, W not Mr. Taraday's hands. He would be open to Councilmember Nand offering an amendment to the wording of B.1. E z Councilmember Paine said some of her questions about what Councilmember Nand raised include whether this could be remedied by having the prosecutor an in-house position made via an appointment Q process by the council. Mayor Nelson clarified the decision package for the in-house prosecutor by the administration was withdrawn several days ago and is not currently a decision package. Mr. Taraday answered as written, the code preserves the flexibility for future councils to make the position either in-house or contract. Councilmember Paine clarified her question was whether this was a council confirmation position. Mr. Taraday answered as currently drafted, it would be if it was in-house, but that is a one-time confirmation. Councilmember Paine said the second part of her question was if council decided there was a policy they wanted to work through such as the relicensing resolution two years ago, it covered more than just prosecution and could the council say that is a policy of the City and Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 19 Packet Pg. 78 7.3.a enforce a policy direction that way if there was a situation like Councilmember Nand brought up. Mr. Taraday answered there are certain ways that that is a possibility. He assumed a contract prosecutor who wanted to keep their position would be wise to exercise their discretion in accordance with council adopted policy. At the end of day, when it comes to case by case filing decisions, a prosecutor will have their independence to make that call. No mayor or council should tell the prosecutor to file a charge; that needs to rest with the prosecutor. If the prosecutor is in-house, they serve at the pleasure of the mayor and if it is a contract, they serve at the pleasure of the council. Councilmember Paine asked if the code of professional responsibilities the city attorney follows are the same for the city prosecutor. Mr. Taraday answered yes. Council President Olson reminded there was a motion on the table to pass the ordinance in the packet when the special meeting ended. In response to Councilmember Teitzel's comment, Councilmember Nand said she was seeking to converse with Mr. Taraday regarding what she felt was a lack of prosecutorial independence from public policy objective in accordance with Section 2.05.015 Legal council - in house which refers to the position that would be created at the pleasure of the council to be in-house which would then be treated as an appointed officer and refers to City Code 2.10. Section 2.10.020 states the mayor shall direct, supervise and be in charge of all appointed officers in the performance of the functions, powers and duties. She was trying to make the point about going to that catchall language for a potential future city prosecutor. A prosecutor always choses the cases they prioritize to prosecute; there are very controversial decisions coming out of certain city prosecutor offices like whether to recriminalize or continue to criminalize simple drug possession for example. Councilmember Nand continued, the way that 2.05.015 Legal counsel — in-house is drafted and having the potential in-house city prosecutor treated as any other appointed officer whose public policy decisions are directed by the mayor, may create an unnecessary perception that the mayor has some sort of political a control over what should be, in her opinion, a position of reinforcing law and order, and have more independence from the mayor and police chief. The Snohomish County prosecutor does not answer to the o Snohomish County Executive, the Snohomish County Council or the Sheriff but is directly answerable to 0 county voters who are able to disagree on policy positions and push back without fear of being docked in o a negative performance review or potentially fired. She suggested 2.05.015 was creating a perception that a a future in-house city prosecutor would not have that level of independence, something she wanted to Q address. N N Councilmember Nand continued, when she suggested to Mr. Taraday 2.05.025 city prosecutor duties, that the city prosecutor shall exercise discretion, it creates more of an enforcement and perception of an in- w house city prosecutor having prosecutorial independence and public policy independence from the mayor's office. That is the way the geographically larger levels of government are set up, the checks and balances at the federal level, the justice department has independence from the executive and legislative branch which in the City would be the mayor's office and the city council. She felt by putting that position in-house and not clarifying that, a future in-house city prosecutor would not have prosecutorial Q independence which could create problems in public policy especially the perception of politically unpopular decisions to either prosecute or not prosecute. Mr. Taraday said one thing the council could do in the subsection that states, "currently exercise discretion to" would be to insert additional language to say "exercise their independent discretion to" which would suggest that this position should be more independent than the typical director. At the end of the day, an in-house city prosecutor serves at the pleasure of the mayor. The only way around that is for Edmonds to become a charter city and have certain employees subject to special terminational provisions set forth in the charter. To his knowledge, the City of Bremerton did that with their city attorney position. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 20 Packet Pg. 79 7.3.a That is a whole can of worms that would be a very lengthy process involving voter approval, etc. and not something that could be solved tonight. In response to the points raised by Councilmember Teitzel, Councilmember Nand said she was unsure whether her previous suggestion in 2.05.025 to say that the city prosecutor shall exercise discretion is sufficient to create the necessary reality and perception that there is prosecutorial independence, but that is something that needs to be codified. Mr. Taraday restated the motion and the amendments from the special meeting that preceded this meeting: • Main motion: Adopt the ordinance in the packet as amended. • Amendments: o Amend 2.05.020.C, to add new subsection 9, "Provide an annual update to the council and the public" o Amend 2.05.025 to add new subsection 4, "Provide an annual update to the council and the public" o Amend 2.05.020.C.4, change "officers" to "officials" o Amend 2.05.035 insert "and upon due notice to council" MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER NAND VOTING NO. 2. COUNCIL APPROVAL FOR CITY ATTORNEY CONTRACT TASK FORCE TO WORK DIRECTLY WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY Councilmember Teitzel explained a task force was created consisting of Councilmembers Chen, Paine and himself to work through issues related to extending the city attorney contract for one year which has included doing due diligence on the background data Mr. Taraday provided council in August. The task force is at the point where they need to work on the contract itself and develop options for the terms and conditions to bring to council for consideration. That requires one of the task force members to work directly with Mr. Taraday on those terms and conditions. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO AUTHORIZE ONE TASK FORCE MEMBER TO WORK DIRECTLY WITH MR. TARADAY. Councilmember Buckshnis asked why everything has to go through council. This was not done two years ago or in 2014. She was confused why this extra talk and work was necessary for something that has been N done easily in the past. o w Councilmember Teitzel responded in 2019 during his first term on council, he and then-Councilmember Mesaros worked on this issue including working with Mr. Taraday to develop options to bring to council. E There was concern expressed by other councilmembers at that time that they were doing that without z approval by council. Out of an abundance of caution this time, he was seeking formal approval before taking that step with Mr. Taraday. Q Councilmember Paine added that this is to allow one person to speak with Mr. Taraday to avoid any OPMA violations. The task force has drafted some contract language and council will see the ultimate product. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if this will include the forensic audit for the OPMA issues addressed last year during the budget process. Councilmember Teitzel said that will be a 2023 issue. The focus now is to get the contract extension completed because the contract expires December 31, 2022. The OPMA and the forensic investigation will be done next year. Councilmember Buckshnis wanted citizens to know Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 21 Packet Pg. 80 7.3.a that process will be initiated and she suggested certain councilmembers should recuse themselves as they may have been part of the OPMA issues last year. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. PRESENTATION ON PROPOSED 2023-2028 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City Engineer Rob English introduced Senior Utilities Engineer Mike DeLilla, Public Works Director Oscar Antillon, and Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director Angie Feser. Mr. English reviewed: Differences between CIP and CFP 1AW1 6-year maintenance 6-year capital projectsw/funding projectsw/ sources funding sources CFP Long-range (20-year) capital project needs • Components found only in the CIP OComponents found only in the CFP O Components found in both the CIP &CFP o Funding for projects in the Public Works CIP are constrained in first three years (secured funding or reasonably expected to be secured funding) o Projects in the second three years have unsecured funding Public Works & Utilities o 2023-2028 CFP & CIP ■ Combined CFP & CIP Document - Transportation Utilities Water Stormwater • Sewer - Facilities - Wastewater Treatment Plant - Comparison to previous year Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 22 Packet Pg. 81 N N O r w c m E z Q 7.3.a CFP & CIP Format Proj Capital Num Facilities Project jects Project 2023 Bu Decision P Budget Numb Amount FF-FPRR1EiT # 2023 2024 2425 2026 Premrudaon /Malnmrraxe fio]ec6 P1WT-01 Annual Street Presenelim Prog aw $1,500AU0 51.500.000 51.500.090 51.650.000 PWr-02 &% Are W O.day Trom nM 51. SW to 2121h 51_ SW I so $0 S0 $0 PWr 03 764 Are W Owday Tram 19fit S1. SW to Olympic Yiew Dr $15. $0 50 $0 PWT-04 Man St. Dlerlay fran 6th Are. to 9t Ale. $157, M.500 5o $0 PWT-05 Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal upgrades so $0 50 S86.000 PWT 06 Srgial Upgrades - 100th Ace P 2381h St. SW so $1 so $160.000 PWT-07 Main St. @ 3N Signal Upgrades 50 $0 50 $0 PWr-61 Dlympc Vew Or 0e1ay-196th ISR-524 to Tahot Rd so $0 $200,000513110.1100 Saferyl Cap-ly Arraly- PVVT-03 X 2281h St. SW from Mvy 99 to 951h PI. W Candor 50 $0 50 51.000.000 PWT-09 X Hwy W Rewtalualion & Gateway Project - Stage 2 $2,64L,000 $0 S9 $0 PWT-10 % Hwy 99 Rew[aliza0on&Ga[eweY ProJecl-Stage3 -4$1,18f1,ODD 52,608.000 $1,500,000 sm"000.000 [.1 Sample Project Sheet t' r_1 rI .J1 i 9 Public Works & Utilities - Transportation 0 2023 Pavement Preservation Projects ■ 2023 Pavement Preservation Program DP#64 - 6 Lane Miles 0 76th Ave Overlay Close-out DP#65($15k) o Main St. Overlay 6th Ave - 9th Ave DP#69($157k) ■ 2023 Design / 2024 Construction ■ $750K Federal Grant ■ 11 New ADA Ramps 0 2023 Safety & Capacity Projects ■ Hwy 99 Revitalization/Gateway DP#66 ($2.6M) ■ Hwy 99 Stage 3 244thSt-238thSt DP#67 ($1.1M) ■ Hwy 99 Stage 4 224thSt-220that DP#68 ($740K) ■ 76th Ave/220th St Intersection DP#63 ($761K) ■ SR-104 Adaptive System DP#70 ($243K) ■ Traffic Signal Safety & Upgrades DP#73 ($30K) ■ Guardrail Improvements DP#74 ($20K) 0 2023 Active Transportation Projects & Planning ■ Transportation Plan Update DP#62 ($170K) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 23 Packet Pg. 82 N N 0 r w c m E z Q 7.3.a ■ Citywide Bicycle Improvements DP#71 ($1.7M) ■ Green Streets DP#72 ($297K) ■ Pedestrian Safety Program DP#75*($80K) ■ Traffic Calming Program DP#76*($33K) ■ Citywide Street Lighting Study DP#77 ($60K) *increase from decision package in budget ■ Elm Way Walkway DP#78 ($901K) Public Works & Utilities - Utilities 0 2023 Water Utility ■ 2022 Replacement Program DP#34 ($1 Ok) ■ 2024 Replacement Program DP#35 ($506K) ■ Waterline Overlays DP#36 ($50K) ■ Yost/Seaview Reservoir Repairs DP#37 ($805K) ■ 2023 Replacement Program DP#38 ($1.7M) 0 2023 Stormwater Utility ■ Perrinville Creek Basin Projects - Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration DP#39 ($750K) - Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update DP#43 ($150K) - Perrinville Creek Basin Flow Mgmt DP#44 ($120K) ■ Seaview Infiltration Facility Ph 2 DP#40 ($1 Ok) ■ Stormwater Overlays DP#41 ($200K) ■ 2024 Replacement Program DP#42 ($290K) ■ Storm & Surface Water Comp Plan DP#45 ($600K) ■ Lake Ballinger Floodplain DP#46 ($750K) ■ Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Impr* ($366K) 0 2023 Sewer Utility ■ 2022 Replacement Program DP#49 ($30k) ■ 2024 Replacement Program DP#50 ($349K) ■ Sewerline Overlays DP#51 ($200K) ■ 2023 Replacement Program DP#52 ($1.6M) ■ Cured in -place pipe rehabilitation DP#53 ($423K) o 2023 WWTP ■ WWTP Clarifier 1 Rehabilitation DP#54 ($350K) ■ Vacuum Filter Replacement DP#55 ($187K) ■ Nuvoda Pre -Design DP#56 ($300K) ■ Joint Sealant DP#57 ($60K) Public Works & Utilities - Facilities o Boys & Girls Club o Cemetery Building o City Hall o Fishing Pier o Frances Anderson Center o Fire Station 16 o Fire Station 17 o Fire Station 20 o Historic Log Cabin o Historic Museum o Library o Meadowdale Club House o Old Public Works o Parks Maintenance Bldg. o Public Safety Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 24 Packet Pg. 83 N N 0 r w c m E z Q 7.3.a o Public Works O&M o Wade James Theater o Yost Pool House CIP/CFP Schedule o July ■ City staff begins development of capital budgets o August/September ■ Submit proposed Capital budget to Finance ■ Prepare draft CFP and CIP o October ■ Planning Board (October 12th) ■ Planning Board Public Hearing (October 26th) ■ City Council Presentation (November 1 st) o November ■ City Council Public Hearing (November 15th) ■ Adopt CFP w/ Budget into the Comprehensive Plan (November 22nd) Councilmember Teitzel said he has several suggestions and possible amendments to the CIP/CFP and asked the process for that. Mr. English recommended amendment be made from the dais as changes to the document will require a council vote. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 10:40 P.M. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL, CHEN, PAINE AND NAND AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. Councilmember Buckshnis thanked staff for the questions they have answered but she has many more. She suggested having an update on the Perrinville Creek because she is having difficulty resolving the carryforward with the new CIP/CFP. In the past, carryforwards were part of budget. ARPA funds totaling $3.5 million have been set aside for Perrinville; an update would be appropriate in view of the additional $1 million set aside for that project. She asked if all the money was spent on Perrinville in 2022, acknowledging she submitted an email with that question and she may need to wait for a response. She > observed the cost of Elm Street went from $300,000 to $900,000, and asked if that was due to changes in ° a the supply chain, labor issues, or cement issues. Mr. English said the dollar amount for Elm Street has not changed; the original decision package last year was just over $900 000• the 2023 decision package was Q gp g Y J P g about the same amount. The difference is through the decision package process, staff is asking for the N budget they anticipate will be needed in 2023 and not have a carryforward. That is Finance's preference r for how to set up 2023 projects. w Councilmember Buckshnis recalled the 2022 budget only includes the approval of $300,000, not an itemization. She suggested looking at carryforwards because it is difficult to track what happened last z year. She recalled staff indicated the two new infrastructure projects funded by bonds had not been M funded yet. She asked if staff wanted councilmembers to make amendments from the dais, noting some Q are related to decision packages. Mr. English recalled once the council begins deliberation on the budget, all the decision package are listed and council can make changes. Mayor Nelson suggested based on past practice, councilmembers submit amendments in writing to Director Turley so he can track them. Councilmember Teitzel thanked Mr. DeLilla for answering this question for him today. With regard to the infiltration facility in Mathay Ballinger, residents have expressed concern that that facility will result in the loss of park footprint. DP#80 to invest up to $500,000 to improve the park with a paved loop walkway, new shelter and picnic tables and permanent restrooms seems at odds with the infiltration facility. He asked if it would be possible to site the infiltration facility somewhere else such as on the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 25 Packet Pg. 84 7.3.a Interurban Trail. Mr. DeLilla answered that stretch of the Interurban Trail that would be most likely to capture flows is owned by PUD. All the utilities in that tract area run perpendicular to the trail and the City only has a specific easement. PUD guards their property fairly aggressively in the event it is needed for future expansion or flexibility to house facilities. Putting a giant infiltration facility there would require quite the discussion with PUD and he did not think the odds for doing that would be good. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Edmonds Marsh water quality improvements and asked about the culverts on SR-104. Mr. DeLilla advised the City hired Doug Hardman and Associates with a grant from DOE to, in coordination with WSDOT, retrofit the catch basins on the west side of SR-104 to address pollutants. None of the money will be used on the culverts owned by WSDOT. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if that was the $366,000 for Edmonds Marsh water quality improvements. Mr. DeLilla answered yes. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if that would be repetitious if the culverts are replaced. Mr. DeLilla answered no, the culverts transmit flows from Shellabarger Creek from the east side to the west side; these are the catch basins in SR-104 and there are very specific small culverts that daylight into the marsh at various locations. This project will capture seven of them to mitigate flows. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Nuvoda predesign for $300,000 to address nitrogen levels at the WWTP and requested staff provide an update on that. Mr. English offered to work with Director Antillon on that. Councilmember Buckshnis commented that is a big topic of conversation for many people. Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director Angie Feser introduced Deputy Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director Shannon Burley who is participating remotely. She reviewed: • 2023-2028 Parks CIP/CFP Framework o PROS Plan Capital Recommendations 1. Acquisition to Fill Park System Gaps - Secure additional land for neighborhood parks to address gaps 2. Open Space & Conservation Acquisitions - Pursue acquisitions that adjoin city properties or conserve unique natural areas 3. Park Development & Enhancements — significant repairs needed for aging infrastructure 4. Yost Pool Replacement - Refine options for the replacement of Yost Pool 5. Trail Connections — Needed to help link destinations across the community 6. ADA, Accessibility & Other User Convenience Enhancements - Remove barriers and improve universal access o PROS Plan Goals (9) 1. ENGAGEMENT - Encourage and facilitate meaningful public involvement in park and recreation planning. 2. DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION - Decrease barriers and provide increased opportunities for participation and representative cultural, heritage and art programs, events representing the diversity of Edmonds demographics. 3. PARKS, TRAILS & OPEN SPACE - Provide an interconnected park system that offers a wide variety of year-round recreation opportunities and experiences which support and enhance Edmonds' cultural identity and the natural environment. 4. WATERFRONT USE & ACCESS - Preserve and pursue opportunities to expand public access and enjoyment of Edmonds' waterfront. 5. NATURAL RESOURCE & HABITAT CONSERVATION - Conserve and provide access to natural resource lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education. 6. CLIMATE CHANGE, ADAPTATION & RESILIENCY - Adapt to climate change and increase local park system resiliency by improving environmental conditions, Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 26 Packet Pg. 85 N N 0 w c m E z Q 7.3.a stewardship and sustainability in parks, trails, open spaces and recreation facilities within planning, development, maintenance, and operations. 7. RECREATION PROGRAMS & FACILITIES - Provide a varied and inclusive suite of recreation opportunities and experiences to promote health and wellness, year-round activity and social engagement. 8. CULTURAL SERVICES - Provide arts and cultural opportunities and experiences to promote an engaged and vibrant community. 9. PARK OPERATIONS & ADMINISTRATION - Maintain and operate a modern, efficient park system that provides a high level of user comfort, safety and aesthetic quality, and protects capital investments. Parks 2023-2028 CIP/CFP — based on PROS Plan o Project -based versus Fund -based 0 2023 Projects = Decision Packages 0 37 CIP/CFP Projects (9 last year) 0 3 Programs (4 last year) 0 5 Parkland Acquisition o Projects coded ■ A — acquisition ■ P — planning ■ D — development ■ R — renovation o Park CIP Revenue ■ REET — Fund 126 ■ REET — Fund 125 ■ Park Impact Fees — fund 332-100 ■ Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition ■ Cemetery Trust Fund 137 — Columbarium expansion ■ Operating Contribution — General Fund ■ Investment Interest (3%) ■ Donations ■ Bond Proceeds ■ Secured Grants ■ Unsecured Grants/Funding Current/ongoing Capital Projects o Complete Civic Park Redevelopment 0 96' Ave Infiltration Project (Civic Park SW mitigation) o Greenhouse Installation o Deferred Maintenance/ Small capital projects 2023-2028 Parks CIP/CFP Project Distribution / IU,P3, v13 NelgM1horhood Park 1L P3, M p15 N•ighhuhbed Park Sh99 P), p19 NPIgM1bpM1Poo Park SF2 - � Nl) LN3WdP Pk.k lmprammenh • _ '/ N3U Slgnap R WrykntlVng 1 P33 Plryg dUPirad•—g— (191] & IpIH • ns�5 __� I I Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 27 Packet Pg. 86 N N 0 r w c m E z Q 7.3.a n Prnpeny I8allinger Park rk & Pod i Parks 2023-2028 CIP/ CFP Projects o Johnson Property — R2, P5 (DP#82) ■ Demolition and Securing 1-acre Property - 2023 ■ Master Plan / Public Input Process - 2025 ■ Estimated Cost $282,000 o Meadowdale Playfields — R3 ■ Inclusive Playground ■ Dugout roofs ■ Light Fixtures ■ Estimated Cost TBD o Mathay Ballinger Park — D5, D6, D7 (DP#80) ■ Paved Loop Pathway ■ Shelter with Picnic Tables ■ Permanent Restroom ■ Estimated Cost: $499,300 ■ May be possibility of doing infiltration project at same time o Yost Park & Pool — R9, R4, R6, R11 (DP#81) ■ Playground Replacement* — 2023 ■ Trail/Bridge Repair — 2024 ■ Tennis Court resurface — 2025 ■ Pool Upgrades — 2025 ■ Estimated Cost: $985,200 *Part of annual inclusive upgrade program o Columbarium Expansion Phase II— R8 ■ Design Complete ■ Fund 130 & 137 (Cemetery Trust Fund) ■ Estimated Cost: $159,000 o Olympic Beach Park — R7 ■ Renovation of existing restroom ■ Estimated Cost: $53,000 o Pine Street Park — D 10, D 11, D 12 ■ Shelter with Picnic Tables — 2024 ■ Paved Pathway — 2024 ■ Canopy Shade Trees — 2024 ■ Estimated Cost: $164,400 o Sierra Park — R8 ■ Playground Replacement* — 2024 ■ Estimated Cost: $187,500 o Neighborhood Park SE 1 — P2, D3 ■ Park Planning — 2024 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 28 Packet Pg. 87 N N O r w c m E z Q 7.3.a ■ Park Construction — 2025 ■ Estimated Cost: $899,100 + Parkland Acquisition (2023) o Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section — P3, D 14 ■ Provides Continuous Accessibility ■ Connect Brackett's Landing North to Marina Beach Park ■ Estimated Cost: $819,500 o Maplewood Hill Park — R12 ■ Playground Replacement* — 2025 ■ Oldest Playground in Park System, 38 Years ■ Estimated Cost: $144,900 *Part of annual inclusive upgrade program o Marsh Estuary Restoration — At, P4, D9 & D1 ■ Estimated Cost: $14,642,500 + Restoration + Marina Beach Park Renovation o Elm Street Park — D 16, D 17, R14 ■ Habitat Restoration — 2026 ■ Nature Playground — 2026 r L ■ Shelter with Picnic Tables — 2026 ■ Estimated Cost: $225,100 E o Neighborhood Park SR 99 — P6, D 15 0 ■ Planning — 2025 Z ■ Construction — 2026 m r ■ Estimated Cost: $926,100 + Parkland Acquisition (2024) n o Neighborhood Park SE 2— P7, D 18 2 ■ Planning — 2026 ■ Construction — 2027 ■ Estimated Cost: $953,900 + Parkland Acquisition (2025) 0 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor — P8, D 19 ■ No funding identified a ■ Parks project? ■ Estimated Cost: $9,206,600 o Park & Facilities Maintenance Building — P 1, D2 M R ■ 40+ Year Old Building o ■ Estimated Cost: $5,762,600 a ■ Parks & Planning Board Recommendation: Begin project sooner than 2026 Q o Seaview Park Restroom — R16 N 04 ■ ADA Improvements ■ Replacement or Renovation of Restroom ■ Estimated Cost: $417,900 w o Yost Pool Replacement — RI ■ Pool is 50 Years Old E ■ Funding Source TBD ■ Estimated Cost: $23,881,000 M o Citywide Park Improvements/Capital Replacement — R17 (DP# 79) Q ■ Backlog of 50+ Projects ■ Small Capital Projects and Deferred Maintenance ■ Job Order Contracting ■ Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 o Signage & Wayfinding — R10 ■ Trail identification, orientation markers, safety & regulatory messaging, park hours, park rules and etiquette, interpretive information and warning signs. ■ Estimated Cost: $51,500 o Playground Upgrade Program — R13 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 29 Packet Pg. 88 7.3.a ■ Playground Replacement / Inclusive Upgrades* ■ Locations to be determined ■ Estimated Cost: $608,900 *part of annual inclusive upgrade program o Parkland Acquisition - A2, A3, A4 ■ Neighborhood Parks SE1, SR99 & SE 2 ■ Acquisition as Feasible ■ Estimated Cost: $5,230,500 o Interurban Trail Expansion - A5 ■ Acquisition of Lands, Easements and/or Rights -of -Way ■ Estimated Cost: $985,585 Operating Budget Notes o Yost Park / Shell Creek Study: $220,000 (DP #23) ■ ARPA Funded ■ Existing Conditions Analysis - Critical Areas Report - Cultural Resources Analysis ■ Recommendations and Action Plan ■ May become capital project Prioritization of 2023 Projects 1. Civic Park completion (incl. 96th Ave Infiltration) In process 2. Greenhouse completion 3. Mathay Ballinger Park improvements 4. Yost Park Playground 2022 PROS Plan Projects 5. Johnson Property demolition 6. Yost Park/Shell Creek Study* (operating DP o Ongoing ■ Land acquisition ■ Citywide improvements ■ Deferred maintenance Council President Olson said she was excited to see the Yost Park Study, specifically the environmental o aspects such as erosion. In that location, she would prioritize environmental issues over the playground. a She thanked staff for signage on the marine sanctuary to remind people of the importance of keeping their Q dogs leashed there. She encouraged the public to keep their dogs leashed on the marine sanctuary, there N will be enforcement because there is a lot at stake. She was also excited to hear about connection from o Mathay Ballinger to the Interurban Trail which will be a wonderful improvement for the residents in that area. w c m Councilmember Chen thanked Ms. Feser for the great information, relaying his excitement for the E emphasis on ADA access including Mathay Ballinger and the connection to the Interurban Trail. He asked about the possibility of an interlocal agreement with Mountlake Terrace. They are doing a lot of Q work on the former golf course including a walking trail, playground, and fishing pier. He asked what an interlocal agreement process would look like. Ms. Feser answered she has had conversations with Mountlake Terrace staff over the last few years about that project. The project is progressing well, they are doing a lot of work, and have secured a lot of grants. There is a section on the northwest corner of the park in the design that Edmonds residents could have better/easier access to that is in the next phase of development. Mountlake Terrace has secured some grants for that but there is still a funding gap. They are going out to bid soon to finish drawings and construction so it is an ideal time for Edmonds to partner with them and bring resources to the table to provide park amenities for Edmonds residents on the edge of that park. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 30 Packet Pg. 89 7.3.a Ms. Feser displayed a graphic of the park, identifying the northwest corner of the lake, the road, and the portion that is technically in Edmonds. In the next phase of development Mountlake Terrace is proposing a new formal entry to the park, an asphalt path along the edge and access to the water with dock, viewing platform and boardwalk, a gravel path and a soft natural fiber path. Next steps would include having a conversation with Mountlake Terrace to see how much money they need to partner with Edmonds, what improvements are needed, and the long term maintenance. Partnering with neighboring jurisdictions is one of the goals and objectives of the PROS plan. Councilmember Chen commented it sounds like a great opportunity. Observing there was no decision package in the budget, he asked if the council should propose a budget amendment for that. Ms. Feser answered yes, it could be part of the budget discussion. A preliminary number the council could consider is $200,000. If the council includes that in the capital program, she can approach Mountlake Terrace about forming an interlocal agreement for those shared improvements. Councilmember Paine thanked Ms. Feser for referencing how projects address goals and objectives in the PROS Plan. She asked about the schedule for reevaluating park impact fees. Ms. Feser answered it is usually done every 8-10 years; it is an in-depth process that usually includes hiring a consultant to consider the different approaches to park impact fees and determine if the existing fee should be changed. Councilmember Paine asked the vintage of the existing park impact fee modality. Ms. Feser estimated it was 2013 but she will confirm and email council. Councilmember Paine suggested due to the new PROS Plan, it may be a good time to consider that. Councilmember Nand said her questions relate to the playground upgrades at Sierra and proposed Neighborhood Parks 1, 2 3. One aspect of the pandemic is a lot of people do not feel comfortable working out in indoors gyms. Edmonds has a large senior population; some parks in Europe are specifically designed for seniors to exercise. She suggested, as an aspect of ADA accessibility and inclusion, that parks include all age accessibility. There is also interest in community gardens and parklets. Flowerbeds such as the ones downtown that have been adopted by businesses would improve walkability in areas of a Highway 99 where there are proposals to add density. Places that have previously been commercial will become residential, raising the question of improving walkability. She envisioned she, Councilmember o Chen and other councilmembers who are interested in more green, more walkability and natural beauty on 0 the Highway 99 corridor could provide budget amendments to accomplish that. Ms. Feser answered it o would be worthwhile to have a conversation regarding what that would look like. The $450,000/year that a is budgeted for smaller projects could be used to identify projects on Highway 99. Councilmember Nand Q suggested consideration also be given to other areas of the City that do not have as many parks. N N A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE AND SECONDED TO EXTEND FOR 10 MINUTES. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF A SUPER MAJORITY (4- j 3); COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND NAND AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON +� VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL, TIBBOTT AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. t 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Q 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS 13. ADJOURN The council meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes November 1, 2022 Page 31 Packet Pg. 90 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Lori Palmer Background/History Approval of replacement checks #65285 through #65292, check #65293 for Clothing Allowance dated October 31, 2022 for $202.61, checks #65294 through #65299 dated November 4, 2022 for $8,487.13, payroll direct deposit for $723,655.10, benefit checks #65300 through #65305 and wire payments for $645,530.67 for the pay period of October 16, 2022 through October 31, 2022. Staff Recommendation Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: 10-16-22 to 10-31-22 benefit checks summary report 10-16-22 to 10-31-22 payroll earnings summary report 10-31-22 payroll earnings summary report Packet Pg. 91 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,058 - 10/16/2022 to 10/31/2022 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt 65300 11/04/2022 bpas BPAS 10,418.91 65301 11/04/2022 chap1 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 175.00 65302 11/04/2022 jhan JOHN HANCOCK 106.96 65303 11/04/2022 icma MISSIONSQUARE PLAN SERVICES 6,955.35 65304 11/04/2022 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 3,733.52 65305 11/04/2022 afscme WSCCCE, AFSCME AFL-CIO 2,408.00 23,797.74 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt 3433 11/04/2022 pens DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 325,193.83 3437 11/04/2022 aflac AFLAC 4,166.88 3439 11/04/2022 mebt WTRISC FBO #N317761 117,141.46 3440 11/04/2022 us US BANK 140,796.33 3442 11/04/2022 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,409.79 3443 11/04/2022 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 28,720.14 3444 11/04/2022 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 304.50 621,732.93 Grand Totals: 645,530.67 11 /2/2022 7.4.a vi a� t v r r= m Direct Deposit m 0.00 0.00 «s 0.00 6 0.00 0.00 C a 0.00 0 M 0.00 0 o. o. Q Direct Deposit o Q. 0.00 a� L 0.00 0.00 E 0.00 E 0.00 u3i 0.00 rn Y 0.00 U a) t U 0.00 +' a� c 0.00 a) tV N r M O O r N N to O r C a) E t t) fC r r Q Packet Pg. 92 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,058 (10/16/2022 to 10/31/2022) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 111 ABSENT NO PAY LEAVE 100.00 0.00 112 ABSENT NO PAY NON HIRED 36.50 0.00 120 SICK SICK LEAVE - L & 1 63.00 1,870.18 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 843.45 35,097.97 122 VACATION VACATION 936.68 41,203.58 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 68.00 2,719.45 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 12.50 406.44 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 216.25 9,238.95 131 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE 104.00 4,428.88 134 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE -UNPAID 88.00 0.00 135 SICK WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEAVE 9.92 196.83 149 KELLY DAY KELLY DAYS BUY BACK -28.00 -1,375.27 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Day Used 127.00 5,614.13 152 COMP HOURS COMPTIME BUY BACK 94.16 4,372.40 153 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY BUY BACK 34.00 1,946.64 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 191.15 10,893.41 157 SICK SICK LEAVE PAYOFF 353.62 22,243.61 158 VACATION VACATION PAYOFF 428.57 26,640.52 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 14.00 781.54 170 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL BASE PAY 600.00 8,499.96 171 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL MEETING PAY 100.00 1,562.00 174 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY 0.00 300.00 175 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICAL 0.00 4,866.36 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 18,230.07 786,134.27 191 REGULAR HOURS FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS 4.00 7,431.19 194 SICK Emerqency Sick Leave 82.00 2,269.82 195 REGULAR HOURS ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE 152.00 10,474.62 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 20.00 735.46 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 36.00 1,968.25 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 16.00 1,511.67 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 486.00 40,183.21 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 20.75 1,517.75 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 381.05 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 1,323.22 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 2,320.73 11/02/2022 Packet Pg. 93 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,058 (10/16/2022 to 10/31/2022) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 602 COMP HOURS 604 COMP HOURS 606 COMP HOURS acc MISCELLANEOUS acs MISCELLANEOUS colre MISCELLANEOUS cpl MISCELLANEOUS crt MISCELLANEOUS deftat MISCELLANEOUS det4 MISCELLANEOUS ed1 EDUCATION PAY ed2 EDUCATION PAY ed3 EDUCATION PAY firear MISCELLANEOUS fmla ABSENT fmly VACATION hol HOLIDAY k9 MISCELLANEOUS less MISCELLANEOUS Iq1 LONGEVITY Ig11 LONGEVITY Ig12 LONGEVITY Ig13 LONGEVITY Ig14 LONGEVITY Iq2 LONGEVITY PAY Iq4 LONGEVITY Iq5 LONGEVITY Iq6 LONGEVITY Iq7 LONGEVITY Iq8 LONGEVITY mtc MISCELLANEOUS pds MISCELLANEOUS pfmp ABSENT pfms SICK phv MISCELLANEOUS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 87.25 0.00 ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 174.00 0.00 ACCRUED COMP 2.0 3.00 0.00 ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 144.03 ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 152.28 Collision Reconstructionist 0.00 93.65 TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 187.30 CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 431.16 DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 130.40 Detective 4% 0.00 1,075.04 EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 730.42 EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 554.18 EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 6,422.67 FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 411.41 FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAID 89.00 0.00 Family Medical Leave Vacation 27.50 1,162.50 HOLIDAY 10.00 495.09 K-9 PAY 0.00 280.93 LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR 0.00 89.60 LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 1,086.45 LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 439.28 Longevity 9% 0.00 3,886.65 Longevity 7% 0.00 598.72 Lonqevitv 5% 0.00 976.97 LONGEVITY PAY 4% 0.00 259.00 Lonqevitv 1 % 0.00 285.30 Lonqevitv 3% 0.00 1,467.07 Lonqevitv .5% 0.00 368.90 Lonqevitv 1.5% 0.00 466.14 Lonqevitv 8% 0.00 252.04 MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 128.30 Public Disclosure Specialist 0.00 108.88 Paid Family Medical Unpaid/Sup 72.80 0.00 Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK 33.20 1,863.56 PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,680.37 11 /02/2022 Packet Pg. 94 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,058 (10/16/2022 to 10/31/2022) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount prof MISCELLANEOUS PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS SER 0.00 203.50 sdp MISCELLANEOUS SPECIAL DUTY PAY 0.00 329.16 sqt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 203.50 St REGULAR HOURS Serqeant Pay 0.00 152.63 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 244.72 vap VACATION Vacation Premium 34.00 1,291.11 23,970.37 $1,067,411.73 Total Net Pay: $732,142.23 CU 0 a 4- 0 0 0 L Q Q Q R E E L R 0 L Q N N T" M O r O N N w r O 11/02/2022 Packet Pg. 95 7.4.c Hour Type 903 Hour Class MISCELLANEOUS Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,116 (10/31/2022 to 10/31/2022) Description CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Hours Amount 0.00 225.00 0.00 $225.00 Total Net Pay: $202.61 11 /02/2022 Packet Pg. 96 7.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #254798 through #254886 dated November 3, 2022 for $857,560.83 and wire payments of $6,369.57 & $1,020.18. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of expenditures. Attachments: claims 11-03-22 wire 10-28-22 wire 11-03-22 FrequentlyUsedProjNumbers 11-03-22 Packet Pg. 97 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 1 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun vi 254798 11/3/2022 078745 A-1 LANDSCAPING & CONSTRUCTION EOMA.Pmt 13 EOMA/PMT 13 THRU 9.30.22 y EOMA/PMT 13 THRU 9.30.22 E 332.000.64.594.76.65.00 411,758.8,1 a EOMA/PMT 13 THRU 9.30.22 125.000.64.594.76.65.00 122,992.9( '3 Total: 534,751.7° -o c 254799 11/3/2022 000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC 84729 PUBLIC WORKS - ANNUAL FIRE AL �a N PUBLIC WORKS - ANNUAL FIRE AL 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 918.7.E t 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 96.41 84736 PUBLIC SAFETY - LABOR FOR STR PUBLIC SAFETY - LABOR FOR STR p 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 465.0( �a 10.5% Sales Tax o L 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 48.8< a Total : 1,529.0! Q 254800 11/3/2022 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 1022240 P&R LEAGUE SHIRTS N P&R LEAGUE SHIRTS c 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 178.9, 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.64.571.25.31.00 18.7E E Total: 197.7( 2 U 254801 11/3/2022 065568 ALLWATER INC 102722030 PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE PARKS & RECREATION DEPT WATE E 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 14.5( 10.5% Sales Tax +a 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 1.5, Q Total: 16.0, 254802 11/3/2022 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 29033 VIEWER SCOPE PLAQUE VIEWER SCOPE PLAQUE Page: 1 Packet Pg. 98 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254802 11/3/2022 069667 AMERICAN MARKETING 254803 11/3/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 358.0( 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 37.5� a Total: 395.55 L 6560091547 WWTP: 10/26/22 UNIFORMSJOWE 3 Mats/Towels $53.28 + $5.60 tax C) 11 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 58.8f y Rentals & Prep Charges $49.88 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 49.8f 6560091560 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS E 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 27.9" 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 2.9< '@ 6560093792 PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS o PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS a 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.6- Q PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 6.1- N PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS c 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 6.1- PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS N 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 6.1 - E PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS 2 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 6.1- PUBLIC WORKS CIVIC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6.Of E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.3- 10.5% Sales Tax Q 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.6, 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.6, Page: 2 Packet Pg. 99 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254803 11/3/2022 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 254804 11/3/2022 075523 ART WALK EDMONDS 254805 11/3/2022 064807 ATS AUTOMATION INC 254806 11/3/2022 076260 BELAIR, ROGER Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 6560093796 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MAT FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 Tota I : 01202022 TPA 22 ART WALK EDMONDS TPA 22 ART WALK EDMONDS 123.000.64.573.20.41.40 Total S135081 alerton system-PW ALERTON SYSTEM-PW 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 Total 11266 PICKLEBALL 11266 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INSTRU, 11266 PICKLEBALL CLINIC INSTRU, 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 Total 254807 11/3/2022 012005 BENDIKSEN & BALL POLYGRAPH EPD 15 EDMONDS PD 7.5.a Page: 3 Page: 3 Packet Pg. 100 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 4 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254807 11/3/2022 012005 BENDIKSEN & BALL POLYGRAPH (Continued) PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH 11 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 300.0( E EPD 16 EDMONDS PD a 2 PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH; 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 600.0( .3 EPD 17 EDMONDS PD PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH 11 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 300.0( Y EPD 18 EDMONDS PD 2 PRE EMPLOYMENT POLYGRAPH; t 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 600.0( Total: 1,800.0( 254808 11/3/2022 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 835726 FLEET - PARTS/ ROTORS, PADS & I o FLEET - PARTS/ ROTORS, PADS & I '@ 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 1,163.8E o 10.25% Sales Tax a 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 119.3( Q Total : 1,283.1t " N N 254809 11/3/2022 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 1372683 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 558.30 GF M FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 558.30 GF C 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 11675.5( N 1375340 FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 594.40 GF E FLEET - AUTO PROPANE 594.40 GF 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 1,512.4E Total : 3,187.91 a� 254810 11/3/2022 073760 BLUELINE GROUP LLC 24557 ONCALL STMWATER SEPT 2022 E t ONCALL STMWATER SEPT 2022 422.000.72.531.90.41.20 11,097.0( Q Total : 11,097.0( 254811 11/3/2022 070052 BOONE, MARY ELIZABETH 05102022 WOTS - NONFICTION FOR KIDS: TF WOTS - NONFICTION FOR KIDS: TF Page: 4 Packet Pg. 101 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 5 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254811 11/3/2022 070052 BOONE, MARY ELIZABETH (Continued) 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 155.0( y Total: 155.0( E 254812 11/3/2022 077181 BOYER ELECTRIC CO INC 118116-1 F.A.C. - TROUBLESHOOT MAIN BRI �a Q- F.A.C. - TROUBLESHOOT MAIN BR[ 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 154.0( 10.5% Sales Tax c 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 �a 16.1 � N Total : 170.1 , a� 254813 11/3/2022 074776 BUCKSHNIS, DIANE OCT2022 MILEAGE REIMBURSE FOR CM BUi Mileage and ferry tolls to Puget Sourn E 001.000.11.511.60.43.00 137.6( E Total: 137.6( o 254814 11/3/2022 078083 BUYCE JR, RICHARD J 11012 TRAINING 11012 CIRCUIT TRAINING INSTRUC > 11012 CIRCUIT TRAINING INSTRUC 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 12.0( a Total: 12.0( Q 254815 11/3/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 29321799 EDMONDS PD N N 10/22 CONTRACT FAX BOARD o 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 36.0, 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 3.7E 29321803 EDMONDS PD 2 10/22 CONTRACT 3AP01257&3AP0- 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 351.9" 10.5% Sales Tax E t 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 36.9E 29321804 P&R C5750 COPIER: CONTRACT OE Q P&R C5750 Copier: Contract Number 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 227.0z 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 23.8z Page: 5 Packet Pg. 102 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 6 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254815 11/3/2022 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES (Continued) 29321809 WWTP: 10/2022 CONTRACT CHG - (D 10/2022 CONTRACT CHG - COPIER E 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 81.81 a 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.45.00 8.6( .3 29321810 EDMONDS PD 10/22 CONTRACT - 38C0l 511 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 191.7E N 10.5% Sales Tax U 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 a� 20.1 29321813 DEV SVCS COPIER LEASE/RENTAL Building copier (SN: 3CE08167)- M 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 35.0 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 3.6E �a 29321815 COPIER LEASE/RENTAL o Planning Copier (SN: 3CE07934)- L a 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 35.0 � Q 10.5% Sales Tax N 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 3.6� N 29321816 COPIER RENTAL FOR COUNCIL OF o Monthly rental for Copier 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 29.0E N 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 3.0E Total : 1,091.51 }; c 254816 11/3/2022 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY324164 FLEET - SUPPLIES/ 131CF CENTRP E FLEET - SUPPLIES/ 131CF CENTRP 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 67.1' m 10.6% Sales Tax Q 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 7.1 Total : 74.2, 254817 11/3/2022 062975 COLLISION CLINIC INC RO47906 UNIT 664 - REPAIR DAMAGES Page: 6 Packet Pg. 103 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254817 11/3/2022 062975 COLLISION CLINIC INC 254818 254819 254820 254821 11/3/2022 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) RO47906 (DEDUCTIBLE) 8498310300732547 8498310301340308 11/3/2022 046150 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 305385 11/3/2022 061860 DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES 11/3/2022 076929 DIBBLE, PAULINE 355250 06122022 7.5.a Page: 7 PO # Description/Account Amoun UNIT 664 - REPAIR DAMAGES 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 19,236.3E E, UNIT 664 - REPAIR DAMAGES (DEC a UNIT 664 - REPAIR DAMAGES (DEC 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 11000.0( .3 Total : 20,236.3E c PUBLIC WRKS - DIGITAL CABLE N Public Works - 7110 210th S SW Y 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 2.3, Public Works - 7110 210th S SW 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 11.1E •� Public Works - 7110 210th S SW U 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 11.1E p Public Works - 7110 210th S SW 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 11.1E p Public Works - 7110 210th S SW a 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 10.6 1 Q UPTOWN CITY HALL - DIGITAL CAB Uptown City Hall - 23632 Highway 99 N 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 351.9E c Total : 398.35 PUBLIC WORKS - ELEVATOR INSPI N E PUBLIC WORKS - ELEVATOR INSPI ca 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 114.1( Total : 114.1( c a) PUBLIC SAFETY - BOILER INSPECT PUBLIC SAFETY - BOILER INSPECT 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 188.8( Q Total : 188.8( CG 22 - ART EXPERIENCE FOR RE. CG 22 - ART EXPERIENCE FOR RE Page: 7 Packet Pg. 104 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254821 11/3/2022 076929 DIBBLE, PAULINE 254822 11/3/2022 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 254823 11/3/2022 007253 DUNN LUMBER 254824 11/3/2022 068292 EDGEANALYTICAL 254825 11/3/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Tota I : 22-4190 CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES City Council Mtg Min 10/25/2022 & Ci 001.000.31.514.31.41.00 Total 9020270 LIBRARY - SUPPLIES LIBRARY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9020372 LIBRARY - SUPPLIES LIBRARY - SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.6% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 Total : 22-33649 WATER QUALITY - WATER SAMPLE WATER QUALITY - WATER SAMPLE 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 Total 3350 FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES FAC MAINT - SHOP SUPPLIES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3354 MUSEUM - SUPPLIES/ NUTS & BOL MUSEUM - SUPPLIES/ NUTS & BOL 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.5.a Page: 8 Page: 8 Packet Pg. 105 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher 254825 254826 254827 Date Vendor 11/3/2022 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 11/3/2022 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice (Continued) 3356 2-11650 2-25150 2-25175 2-26950 2-28275 2-29118 2-37180 7-05276 11/3/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES AR230610 7.5.a Page: 9 PO # Description/Account Amoun PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES PUBLIC SAFETY - SUPPLIES E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 45.9 � a 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.& Total : 63.5, c 9309 BOW DOIN WAY/ METER 7236 y 9309 BOW DOIN WAY/ METER 7236 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 207.4( WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C WEST PLANTER IRRIGATION 870 C E 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 80.6� EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 C) p EAST PLANTER IRRIGATION 875 Cj '@ 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 119.5E o LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTRE/ a LIFT STATION #3 729 NORTHSTRE/ Q' Q 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 114.7 PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV N PLANTER IRRIGATION 1400 9TH AV c 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 153.6, LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / N LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / E 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 61.2z 2 SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER E SAM STAMM OVERLOOK / METER E c 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 81.6f E CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 CEMETERY SEWER & STORM 820 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 302.3 � Q Total : 1,121.3! MK5533 - A12687 WATER SEWER C Water Sewer Copy Use 6/13/22-7/12i Page: 9 Packet Pg. 106 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254827 11/3/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 10 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) N 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.7< Water Sewer Copy Use 6/13/22-7/12/ E 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 6.7< a 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 0.7' 3 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 0.7( cm AR230611 MK5533 - A12687 WATER SEWER C Water Sewer Copy Use 7/13/22-8/12/ 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.1 E Water Sewer Copy Use 7/13/22-8/12/ E 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 0.9E o 10.5% Sales Tax �a 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 0.9E o AR230612 MK5533 - A12687 WATER SEWER C a Water Sewer Copy Use 8/13/22-9/12/ a Q 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 6.1 � N Water Sewer Copy Use 8/13/22-9/12/ N 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 6.1 £ o 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 0.6E N 10.5% Sales Tax E 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 0.6E AR231248 EDMONDS PD }; 9/22 CLR & BW - A12434 & A12435 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 182.9" E 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 19.2' Q AR231249 EDMONDS PD 9/22 BW & CLR CHARGES C58501 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 61.4, 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 10 Packet Pg. 107 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 11 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254827 11/3/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 6.4,' AR231258 MK5610 - A10013 PW COPIER USAi E PW Copy Use 9/6/22-10/5/22 Q 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 13.4E PW Copy Use 9/6/22-10/5/22 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 7.61' PW Copy Use 9/6/22-10/5/22 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 7.6( N PW Copy Use 9/6/22-10/5/22 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 5.3£ PW Copy Use 9/6/22-10/5/22 E 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.3£ 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 1.4 0 10.5% Sales Tax �a 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 0.8( o 10.5% Sales Tax a 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 0.8( Q 10.5% Sales Tax N 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 0.51 N 10.5% Sales Tax o 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 0.5 10.5% Sales Tax u, 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.5E . PW Copy Use 9/6/22-10/5/22 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 5.3£ AR232115 MK5533 - A12687 WATER SEWER C 10.5% Sales Tax E t 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.1 £ UM Water Sewer Copy Use 9/13/22-10/1 , Q 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 11.3 1 Water Sewer Copy Use 9/13/22-10/1 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 11.3E 10.5% Sales Tax Page: 11 Packet Pg. 108 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 12 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254827 11/3/2022 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES (Continued) 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.2( y AR2322264 BW COLOR USAGE FOR COUNCIL E B/W and Color usage 9/19 to 10/18/2 a 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 4.0" 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 0.4, AR232263 COPIER LEASE/RENTAL Planning Copier (SN: 3CE07934)- 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 10.5( u 10.5% Sales Tax t 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 1.1( AR232266 MK5610 - A11959 FLEET COPY USA Fleet Copy Use 9/19/22-10/18/22 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 27.6� o 10.5% Sales Tax �a 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.9' o L Total: 440.01 a Q 254828 11/3/2022 078919 EMERALD CITY FLOORBALL 11051 FLOORBALL 11051 FLOORBALL CLASS INSTRU( 11051 FLOORBALL CLASS INSTRU( N 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 162.0( c Total: 162.0( 254829 11/3/2022 076939 ESSENTRICALLY FIT LLC 11000 ESSENTRICS 11000 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRI N E 11000 ESSENTRICS CLASS INSTRI 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 156.7E Total: 156.7E a� 254830 11/3/2022 076751 FALK, NICHOLAS NFalk Oct2022 EXPENSE REIMB MILEAGE E t Oct Mileage for trips to Snohomish M 0 001.000.62.524.10.43.00 45.2E Q Total : 45.2E 254831 11/3/2022 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA 10965 10966 TAIJIQUA 10965 10966 TAIJIQUA INSTRUCTIC 10965 TAIJIQUA INSTRUCTION Page: 12 Packet Pg. 109 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 13 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254831 11/3/2022 068617 GLEISNER, BARBARA (Continued) 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 399.6( y 10966 TAIJIQUA INSTRUCTION E, 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 266.4( a Total: 666.0( L 254832 11/3/2022 012199 GRAINGER 9467087996 WATER - SUPPLIES/ DISC MAGNET 3 WATER - SUPPLIES/ DISC MAGNET c 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 �a 44.3z N 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 4.6E 9478263875 PUBLIC SAFETY - PARTS/ V-BELT F PUBLIC SAFETY - PARTS/ V-BELT F E 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 52.0( 10.5% Sales Tax o 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.4E '@ 9478944144 PUBLIC SAFETY - PARTS/ V-BELT F 0 PUBLIC SAFETY - PARTS/ V-BELT F a 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 34.0, Q 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.5 1 N Total: 144.0' c 254833 11/3/2022 076436 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 141436 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION HYDRAI GRANITE CONSTRUCTION HYDRAI E 421.000.245.110 950.0( 'M Total: 950.0( 254834 11/3/2022 079009 GUENTHER, MACKEY MGuenther Oct2022 CORNERCOPIA EVENT MAILERS c USPS: Event mailers for Cornercopia 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 313.9, Total 254835 11/3/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 4010173 WWTP: PO 736 SCREWDRIVER, El PO 736 SCREWDRIVER, ETC./PART 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 300.8E Page: 13 Packet Pg. 110 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 254835 11/3/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 7024194 WWTP: PO 736 CLAMP LIGHT, ROC PO 736 CLAMP LIGHT, ROCKET TC 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 8234354 WWTP: PARTIAL CREDIT AGAINST PARTIAL CREDIT AGAINST INV. 401 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 903278 WWTP: PO 736 HUSKY IMP SET & E PO 736 HUSKY IMP SET & SAE SCI 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Total 254836 11/3/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1022853 PM: THERMOMETER, DIGITAL CALI PM: THERMOMETER, DIGITAL CALI 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4020285 PM: LUMBER PM: LUMBER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4524117 PM: PEBBLES PM:PEBBLES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9030481 PM: UTILITY BELT, SOCKET SET 7.5.a Page: 14 Amoun m 30.9� E �a a a� L 290.9E .3 29.9 Y a� -149.0( E 0 96.91 0 L 9.9E a 595.4( a N N M 0 78.1 E N 8.0E E U 0, Page: 14 Packet Pg. 111 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 254836 11/3/2022 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES (Continued) PM: UTILITY BELT, SOCKET SET 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 9030482 PM: STEEL STAKE PM: STEEL STAKE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 10.3% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 Total 254837 11/3/2022 079033 HYUN SON SHIN 02 TRANSLATION SERVICES Zoom testing and Korean translation 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 Tota I : 254838 11/3/2022 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC U2216049887 WATER - PARTS/ BALL CURBSTOP WATER - PARTS/ BALL CURBSTOP 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 Tota I : 254839 11/3/2022 066265 INDUSTRIAL SCIENTIFIC CORP 2573000 WWTP: PO 907 BATTERY, PUMP, E PO 907 PO 907 BATTERY, PUMP, E' 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 Tota I : 254840 11/3/2022 069851 JACKYE'S JACKETS 24683 STORM - EMROIDER LOGO AND W STORM - EMROIDER LOGO AND W 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 10.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 Total 7.5.a Page: 15 Page: 15 Packet Pg. 112 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 16 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254841 11/3/2022 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 7275 FIBER OPTICS INTERNET CONNEC Nov-2022 Fiber Optics Internet (D 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 590.0( E, 10.5% Sales Tax a 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 61.9E Total: L 651.9E '3 254842 11/3/2022 078946 KITCHENS, KYLEE 10997 BARRE 10997 BARRE CLASS INSTRUCTIOI 10997 BARRE CLASS INSTRUCTIOI y 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 240.0( 11166 10994 BARRE 11166 10994 BARRE CLASS INSTRI 11166 BARRE CLASS INSTRUCTIOI` 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 486.0( •� 10994 BARRE CLASS INSTRUCTIOI U 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 739.2( p Total: 1,465.2( 254843 11/3/2022 072914 LAUGHTLAND, AMANDA 06102022 WOTS - POETRY CRITIQUES AND E a WOTS - POETRY CRITIQUES AND E Q- Q 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 140.0( Total: 140.0( N 254844 11/3/2022 078471 LEMM, KEVIN 10986 TAEKWON-DO 10986 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI` M C 10986 TAEKWON-DO INSTRUCTIOI` 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 932.4( Total : 932.4( 254845 11/3/2022 069862 MAKERS ARCHITECTURE AND 2143-5 PROF SVCS Project: Hwy 99 Renewal Plan- 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 7,443.7E t 2143-6 PROF SVCS Project: Hwy 99 Renewal Plan- Q 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 6,618.7E 2143-7 PROF SVCS Project: Hwy 99 Renewal Plan- 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 2,615.0( Page: 16 Packet Pg. 113 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # 254845 11/3/2022 069862 069862 MAKERS ARCHITECTURE AND (Continued) 254846 11/3/2022 067235 MARYS TOWING INC 99739 254847 11/3/2022 075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA 11055 11071 254848 11/3/2022 074556 MOORE, IACOFANO & GOLTSMAN INC 76776 254849 11/3/2022 074115 NEGGERS, CARLA 254850 11/3/2022 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 05102022 Description/Account Total CS 22-18185 - EDMONDS PD TOW GREEN BMW - CS 22-18185 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 Total 11055 11071 FELDENKRAIS INSTRI 11055 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOP 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 11071 FELDENKRAIS INSTRUCTIOP 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 Total PROFSVCS Project: Edmonds Green Streets- 001.000.62.524.10.41.00 Total WOTS - PRESENTATION: CREATE) WOTS - PRESENTATION: CREATE) 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Total 0813199-IN FLEET - FILTERS FLEET - FILTERS 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.40 0813378-IN FLEET - SUPPLIES/ OIL FLEET - SUPPLIES/ OIL 511.000.77.548.68.34.21 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.21 7.5.a Page: 17 Amoun 16,677.5( 4 C m E �a 254.0( L 26.6 280.6 1 �a Y V a� t 128.7( E 42.9( 171.6( o �a 0 22,156.0< a 22,156.0: Q N N M 0 155.0( 155.0( E 95.1.E E 9.9� U �a a 1,194.5E 125.4< Page: 17 Packet Pg. 114 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 18 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254850 11/3/2022 024302 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM (Continued) Total : 1,425.1E 254851 11/3/2022 065720 OFFICE DEPOT 269485948001 INV 269485948001 ACCT 90520437 m E PW - YELLOW CARD STOCK �a 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 45.7E 10.5% Sales Tax L 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 4.8- 3 270236258001 INV270236258001 ACCT 90520437 c PW- SUPPLIES/ PENS & SHARPIE N 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 43.6� 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 4.5E Total: 98.8E . �a 254852 11/3/2022 077389 OLYMPIC ELEVATOR COMPANY 13621 F.A.C. - SECOND PAYMENT FOR FII 4- F.A.C. - SECOND PAYMENT FOR FII O 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 �a 18,655.7( o 10.5% Sales Tax a 001.000.66.518.30.41.00 1,958.8E Q Total: 20,614.5° _. 254853 11/3/2022 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 3685-239533 UNIT 66 - PARTS/ OIL FILTER N N UNIT 66 - PARTS/ OIL FILTER M c 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 15.4, 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.6, 3685-240430 FLEET - PARTS/ WIPER BLADES FLEET - PARTS/ WIPER BLADES 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 45.1E 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 4.7z Total 254854 11/3/2022 069873 PAPE MACHINERY INC 14022502 UNIT 66 - PARTS/ FILTER UNIT 66 - PARTS/ FILTER 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 107.9 , Page: 18 Packet Pg. 115 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254854 11/3/2022 069873 PAPE MACHINERY INC 254855 11/3/2022 079162 PATRICK & LAURIE PASCHAL Voucher List City of Edmonds Invoice PO # Description/Account (Continued) Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 Tota I : 3-16225 #22-426522 UTILITY REFUND #22-426522 Utility refund - received 411.000.233.000 Total 254856 11/3/2022 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 1120841 254857 11/3/2022 079161 POWERS, DEBORAH 254858 11/3/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY SEWER - SHIPPING SEWER - SHIPPING 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 Total : DPowers Oct2022 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEE Partners in Community Forestry 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 Total 200000704821 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER 70( 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200002411383 YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN YOST PARK/POOL 9535 BOWDOIN 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 200007876143 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 200009595790 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST ; 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 200011439656 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 7.5.a Page: 19 Amoun m 19.8, E �a a 13.4, L 141Z '3 c �a N 270.6( U 270.6( t E 2 U 40.1 £ o 40.1 F 0 a a 663.0( Q 663.0( N M 0 919.5' E 2 U 4,632.1 a� E t 87.1 E um a 149.0E Page: 19 Packet Pg. 116 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 20 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254858 11/3/2022 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (Continued) 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 57.4£ 200016558856 CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME E CIVIC CENTER 250 5TH AVE N / ME 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 a 114.9, 200016815843 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 3 FIRE STATION #17 275 6TH AVE N / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 271.8- 200017676343 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 FLEET MAINTENANCE BAY 21105 7 Y U 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 118.8£ t 200019375639 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 E MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 94.0z Z 200019895354 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � p SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / � 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 63.2' o 200020415911 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 0- PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; Q' Q 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 8.1E .r PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; N 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 31.0, c PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 31.0, N PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; E 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 31.0, 2 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH : }; 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 31.0, PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ; E 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 31.0- 200024711901 CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE fd CITY PARK BUILDING 600 3RD AVE Q 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 226.2, Total: 6,897.7° 254859 11/3/2022 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 161071 UNIT 227 - TOWING Page: 20 Packet Pg. 117 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher List City of Edmonds Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account 254859 11/3/2022 070955 R&R STAR TOWING (Continued) UNIT 227 - TOWING 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 10.6% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 Total : 254860 11/3/2022 078930 RANUNCULUS PRESS 05102022 WOTS - PRESENTATION: DON'T PU WOTS - PRESENTATION: DON'T PU 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 Total 254861 11/3/2022 078283 REINTEGRATED MEDIA 453 A/V TECH SUPPORT FOR COUNCIL A/V support for hybrid council meetinc 001.000.11.511.60.41.00 Total 254862 11/3/2022 063048 RH BROWN LLC 0183633-IN WWTP: PO 916 ELECTRICAL BD FC PO 916 ELECTRICAL BD FOR MAGI 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 10.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.00 Total 254863 11/3/2022 079019 ROOTAND LIMB YOGA 11080 YOGA 11080 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTION 11080 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 11084 YOGA 11084 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTION 11084 YOGA CLASS INSTRUCTION 001.000.64.571.27.41.00 Total 254864 11/3/2022 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO 652801 ACCT 1733 - EDMONDS PD 223 55GR AMMO 7.5.a Page: 21 Page: 21 Packet Pg. 118 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254864 11/3/2022 067802 SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIP CO 254865 11/3/2022 063306 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 254866 11/3/2022 060889 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 254867 11/3/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 22 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) N 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 6,580.8( ED 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 690.9E a Total: 7,271.7E L 6673-1 PM PAINT SUPPLIES 3 PM PAINT SUPPLIES c 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 �a 62.9' y 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.6' Total : 69.5, ARV/54925032 FLEET - DIAGNOSTIC SCAN TOOL f° FLEET - DIAGNOSTIC SCAN TOOL 511.000.77.594.48.64.20 o 6,259.0, '@ 10.5% Sales Tax o 511.000.77.594.48.64.20 657.2( a Total : 6,916.2: Q 200274959 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W c14 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23602 76TH AVE W 1N 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 21.5, c 200386456 CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE CLUBHOUSE 6801 MEADOWDALE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 73.6' 200663953 ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M ANWAY PARK 131 SUNSET AVE / M 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 57.8( 200748606 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW TRAFFIC LIGHT 9730 220TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 23.0( Q 200943348 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V TRAFFIC LIGHT 23202 EDMONDS V 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 52.9E 201054327 BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 50 I Page: 22 Packet Pg. 119 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254867 11/3/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 23 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi BRACKETT'S LANDING NORTH 501 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 46.5, E 201192226 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W a TRAFFIC LIGHT 20408 76TH AVE W 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 23.7, 3 201265980 LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � LIFT STATION #12 16121 75TH PL � 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 161.7� N 201374964 LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P LIFT STATION #11 6811 1/2 157TH P t 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 24.8� 201557303 CEMETERY BUILDING CEMETERY BUILDING 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 79.4� o 201582152 TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W �a TRAFFIC LIGHT 19600 80TH AVE W o L 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 36.3f 201594488 LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S Q LIFT STATION #15 7710 168TH PL S .r 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 22.1 � N N 201610276 OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT i M 0 OVERHEAD STREET LIGHTING AT i 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 9.2( N 201611951 TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W E TRAFFIC LIGHT 20801 76TH AVE W 2 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 38.4, U }; 201656907 DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN DECORATIVE LIGHTING 413 MAIN! E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 134.3z 201762101 415 5TH AVE S fd 415 5TH AVE S Q 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 24.4< 201782646 TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � TRAFFIC LIGHT 901 WALNUT ST / � 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 20.0' Page: 23 Packet Pg. 120 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254867 11/3/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 24 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 201907862 TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW (D TRAFFIC LIGHT 7133 212TH ST SW E 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 34.5E a 202077194 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 499.9E 202087870 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / MEl 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 150.5( 202139655 BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 t BRACKETT'S LANDING SOUTH 100 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 28.4E 202161535 CEMETERY WELL PUMP CEMETERY WELL PUMP p 130.000.64.536.50.47.00 155.3, �a 202289096 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME o TRAFFIC LIGHT 22400 HWY 99 / ME a 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 59.7� Q 202289120 TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME .r TRAFFIC LIGHT 23801 HWY 99 / ME N 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 59.6E c 202421582 LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI LOG CABIN & DECORATIVE LIGHTI N 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 67.3E E 202579520 WWTP: 10/1-10/31/22 ENERGY MGI �a 10/1-10/31/22 ENERGY MANAGEME 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 11.4- 204292213 CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST E CHARGE STATION #1 552 MAIN ST 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 92.7- 204467435 HAZEL MILLER PLAZA Q HAZEL MILLER PLAZA 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 27.7z 220547582 TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE TRAFFIC LIGHT SR104 @ 95TH AVE Page: 24 Packet Pg. 121 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 25 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254867 11/3/2022 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 (Continued) 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 47.5£ ED 220792758 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME E TRAFFIC LIGHT 22730 HWY 99 - ME ca 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 a 75.3< 222704264 WWTP: 9/22-10/21/22 FLOWMETER 3 9/22-10/21/22 FLOW METER 23219 423.000.76.535.80.47.62 22.2E Total : 2,183.0j Y 254868 11/3/2022 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 103584 WWTP: ACCT 103584-10/2022 REC ACCT 103584 -10/2022 RECYCLING 423.000.76.535.80.47.66 38.7E . 201159 WWTP: ACCT #201159 - 10/2022 G, U ACCT #201159 - 10/2022 GARBAGE o 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 184.5, —@ Total: 223.3: o L 254869 11/3/2022 075971 STEEL MAGIC NORTHWEST 06152022 CG 22 - HERE COMES THE SUN CC a CG 22 - HERE COMES THE SUN CC Q 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 1,500.0( N Total: 1,500.0( ch 0 254870 11/3/2022 077312 SUBMITTABLE 152686 WOTS/PA W OTS/PA N 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 4,380.5< M Total: 4,380.5: Z 254871 11/3/2022 071666 TETRATECH INC 51925679 EOFA/SERVICES THRU 7.1.22 a� EOFA/SERVICES THRU 7.1.22 E 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 t 3,962.0( 51951532 EOFA/SERVICES THRU 9.2.22 EOFA/SERVICES THRU 9.2.22 Q 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 1,461.5( 51975366 EOFA/SERVICES THRU 9.30.22 EOFA/SERVICES THRU 9.30.22 Page: 25 Packet Pg. 122 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254871 11/3/2022 071666 TETRATECH INC 254872 11/3/2022 070774 U LI N E I N C 254873 11/3/2022 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 254874 11/3/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 26 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) N 422.000.72.594.31.41.00 703.7E y Total: 6,127.2E E, 155585781 WWTP: PO 918 PAPER TOWELS, H �a °- PO 918 PAPER TOWELS, HAND SC 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 200.0( Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 56.2f y 10.5% Sales Tax U 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 26.9- Total: 283.15 144103 SEWER - SUPPLIES f° SEWER - SUPPLIES U 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 o 109.6, '@ Freight o 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 19.1( a 10.5% Sales Tax Q 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 13.5, Total: 142.2' N 9918821605 C/A 571242650-0001 M C iPhone/iPad Cell Service Bldg 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 680.4� iPhone/iPad Cell Service City Clerk 001.000.31.514.31.42.00 36.2; iPhone/iPad Cell Service Comm Svc 001.000.61.557.20.42.00 199.4- iPhone/iPad Cell Service Comm Svc t 001.000.61.573.90.42.00 90.3< iPhone/iPad Cell Service Council Q 001.000.11.511.60.35.00 55.21 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Council 001.000.11.511.60.42.00 791.4E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court Page: 26 Packet Pg. 123 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254874 11/3/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 27 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 001.000.23.512.51.35.00 55.2, iPhone/iPad Cell Service Court E 001.000.23.512.51.42.00 347.2, a iPhone/iPad Cell Service Dev Svcs 001.000.62.524.10.42.00 281.3( .3 iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering 001.000.67.518.21.35.00 453.0< iPhone/iPad Cell Service Engineering Y 001.000.67.518.21.42.00 1,545.6, iPhone/iPad Cell Service Facilities 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 353.8' E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance 001.000.31.514.20.42.00 36.2 1 _M iPhone/iPad Cell Service Finance o 001.000.31.514.23.42.00 23.4� > iPhone/iPad Cell Service HR o 001.000.22.518.10.42.00 251.6( Q iPhone/iPad Cell Service Human Sen Q 001.000.63.557.20.42.00 50.3, N iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS N 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 M 399.5( c iPhone/iPad Cell Service IS 512.000.31.518.88.42.00 364.2z iPhone/iPad Cell Service Mayor E E 001.000.21.513.10.42.00 100.6z U iPhone/iPad Cell Service Park Admin 001.000.64.571.21.42.00 50.3, aa) iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Rec E t 001.000.64.571.22.42.00 150.9E iPhone/iPad Cell Service PD V Q 001.000.41.521.10.35.00 110.4E iPhone/iPad Cell Service PD 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 3,070.0E Air cards PD Page: 27 Packet Pg. 124 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254874 11/3/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 28 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 1,407.1 y iPhone/iPad Cell Service Planning E 001.000.62.558.60.42.00 482.5E a iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 36.1('3 iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 10.3" iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 36.1( u iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 10.3' E iPhone/iPad Cell Service PW Admin 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 10.3' iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street o 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 113.2, iPhone/iPad Cell Service Fleet o 511.000.77.548.68.35.00 795.5E a iPhone/iPad Cell Service Fleet Q 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 154.3E N iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/SeWe N 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 M 95.4� c iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water/Sewe 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 95.4E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 340.7( U iPhone/iPad Cell Service Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 537.0" iPhone/iPad Cell Service Storm E t 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 156.3( iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn Q 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 305.2< iPhone/iPad Cell Service Street/Storn 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 305.2' iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP Page: 28 Packet Pg. 125 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 29 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254874 11/3/2022 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS (Continued) 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 55.2z iPhone/iPad Cell Service WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 641.0E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks Disco 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 140.6E iPhone/iPad Cell Service Parks 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 406.6z Total : 15,632.5! 254875 11/3/2022 064649 VERMEER NW SALES INC S87324 WATER - SUPPLIES/ HAMMERHEA[ WATER - SUPPLIES/ HAMMERHEA[ 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 74.5� 10.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 7.& Total: 82.4, 254876 11/3/2022 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 201137012 BLEA 847 - EDMONDS PD PETTIT BLEA 7/26-12/2/22 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 4,212.0( Total: 4,212.0( 254877 11/3/2022 067917 WALLY'S TOWING INC 2210270 CS 22-20974 - EDMONDS PD TOW RED VW CS 22-20974 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 254.0( 10.6% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 26.9, Tota I : 280.9, 254878 11/3/2022 075283 WAVE 3201-1027483-01 FIBER HIGH SPEED INTERNET SEF High Speed Internet service 11/01/22 512.000.31.518.87.42.00 816.0( Total : 816.0( 254879 11/3/2022 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 8273 BUSINESS CARDS FOR CM TEITZE Business Cards (250) for CM Teitzel E Page: 29 Packet Pg. 126 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 30 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254879 11/3/2022 073552 WELCO SALES LLC (Continued) 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 76.0( 10.5% Sales Tax E 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 7.9E a 8297 LETTERHEAD FOR FINANCE Letterhead 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 238.0( 10.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 24.9E N Total: 346.9j u t 254880 11/3/2022 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 0000053126 E22AA-1070 - PUCK DETECTION Ob E22AA-1070 - PUCK DETECTION O� E 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 2 15,948.4, U 10.5% Sales Tax o 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 1,674.5E @ 0000053143 E22DA-1072 - RRFB'S FOR 220TH & 0 E22DA-1072 - RRFB'S FOR 220TH & a 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 15,456.2E Q Freight 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 629.4( N 10.5% Sales Tax c 125.000.68.542.64.48.00 1,689.0( 0000053606 TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ EPDXY N TRAFFIC - SUPPLIES/ EPDXY E 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 367.5, 2 10.5% Sales Tax U 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 38.5E 0000053671 TRAFFIC - RRFB'S LIGHT BARS FO E TRAFFIC - RRFB'S LIGHT BARS FO 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 5,800.0( 10.5% Sales Tax Q 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 609.0( Total: 42,212.8( 254881 11/3/2022 076797 WRITERS CONNECTION 05102022 WOTS - PRESENTATION: HOW TO' Page: 30 Packet Pg. 127 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 31 Bank code : Voucher usbank Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 254881 11/3/2022 076797 WRITERS CONNECTION (Continued) WOTS - PRESENTATION: HOW TO (D 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 155.0( E Total: 155.0( a 254882 11/3/2022 063008 WSDOT RE 41 JZ0605 L015 GATEWAY SIGN RELOCATION PLAI L GATEWAY SIGN RELOCATION PLAI 3 001.000.64.576.80.41.00 125.8E RE 41 JZ1441 L003 EODC/JULY 2022 PROJECT COSTS N EODC/JULY 2022 PROJECT COSTS 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 82.2' RE 41 JZ1441 L004 EODC/AUGUST 2022 PROJECT CO: EODC/AUGUST 2022 PROJECT CO: E 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 332.3E Total: 540.41, o 254883 11/3/2022 077286 WSP USA INC 1206823 E20CE/SERVICES THRU 8.5.2022 > E20CE/SERVICES THRU 8.5.22 0 a 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 40,174.8E Q 1215487 E20CE/SERVICES THRU 9.2.22 E20CE/SERVICES THRU 9.2.22 N 1h 112.000.68.595.33.41.00 43535.6E Total: 83:710.51 o T- 254884 11/3/2022 064213 WSSUATREASURER 2022-10 EDMONDS SOFTBALL LEAGE UMPIRES: OCTC E SOFTBALL LEAGE UMPIRES: OCTC 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 4,332.0( Total: 4,332.0( a� 254885 11/3/2022 078389 ZENNER USA 0072268-IN WATER - INVENTORY- E WATER - INVENTORY- t 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 2,418.5( Q Freight 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 315.4z 0072305-IN WATER - INVENTORY WATER - INVENTORY Page: 31 Packet Pg. 128 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254885 11/3/2022 078389 ZENNER USA 254886 11/3/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 32 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) N 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 1,011.6f Freight E 421.000.74.534.80.34.30 148.0( a Total: 3,893.6, L 253-007-4989 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) 3 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETR) c 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 �a 31.1 N 253-012-9166 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES t 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 162.8E TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 302.4z 253-012-9189 WWTP: 10/25-11/24/22 AUTO DIALE o 10/25-11/24/22 AUTO DIALER - 1 VC '@ 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 41.6- o 253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE a TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE Q- Q 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 19.8� " TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE N 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 36.9z c 253-017-4360 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE N 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 47.0E E TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 2 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 87.4' U 425-712-8347 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE E 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 78.7z 425-771-0158 FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} fd FIRE STATION #16 ALARM AND FA} Q 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 148.9� 425-771-5553 WWTP: 10/25-11/24/22 AUTO DIALE 10/25-11/24/22 AUTO DIALER - 1 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 134.5E Page: 32 Packet Pg. 129 vchlist 11 /03/2022 10:42:29AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 254886 11/3/2022 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 89 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 89 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.a Page: 33 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) vi 509-022-0049 LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI LIFT STATION #2 VG SPECIAL ACCI E 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 26.4E a Total : 1,118.1, L Bank total : 857,560.& c Total vouchers : 857,560.W N U a� t E 0 0 L Q 0. 21 N N M O N E 2 V C E t V a Page: 33 Packet Pg. 130 7.5.b vchlist 10/28/2022 3:34:20PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 10282022 10/28/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Page: Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun .-. N 2969 COUNCIL VISA- SUPPLIES AND MI; Registration for CM Buckshnis Hope m E 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 25.0( Registration for CM Teitzel Snohomisl Q- 001.000.11.511.60.49.00 60.3z a) Awards Service - Name badges for C 3 001.000.11.511.60.31.00 30.9 , 3732 3732 RICH LINDSAY CREDIT CARD f° WRPA: AQUATICS CONFERENCE F U) � 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 510.0( NORTHWEST MEADOWS: FLOWEF U 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 114.5 1 .E KVAN BOURGONDIEN: FLOWER PF 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 644.2 , 4210 AMAZON ORDER o Amazon - pens c 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 23.4t " CL 4697 OCTOBER SNOHOMISH COUNTY C Q- Q Oct. SnoCo Cities & Towns mtg 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 60.3z N Amazon - note pads ao 001.000.21.513.10.31.00 10.1 1 c canva subscription 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 12.9,1 .� 5585/8770 CREDIT FOR RETURNED ITEMS: El 3 CREDIT FOR RETURNED ITEMS: El 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 -159.8£ 5585/8770 5585 JESSE CURRAN CREDIT CAR AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: FLAGS 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 41.9( Q AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: BATTERIE 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.3� AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: LIGHT BU 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 123.0( Page: 1 Packet Pg. 131 vchlist 10/28/2022 3:34:20PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 10282022 10/28/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.b Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ^ AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: SOAP, BU N 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 50.8' AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: STAPLER >% 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 c� 39.8( Q- AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: CLEANIN( 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 159.0£ 3 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: AIR FILTE � c 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.4, f° EREPLACEMENT PARTS: PM EQUII 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 159.8£ t AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: GRAFFITI U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 165.4, E AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: CLEANIN( �° U 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 61.8E c AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: PRINTER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 M 41.4( c AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: SAFETY Q. 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 24.2� Q AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: LAMINATI �- 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 178.9'. N AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: TRAFFIC ao 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 276.0£ c AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: SAFETY E 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 am 39.2' .L AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: LITTER GI 3 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 72.9( c FREENOTES HARMONY: PM PLAY( E E 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 425.9£ 0 AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: SAFETY 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 23.7z Q AMAZON: PM SUPPLIES: WORK GL 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 79.5( EREPLACEMENT PARTS: PM EQUIP 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 159.8£ Page: 2 Packet Pg. 132 vchlist 10/28/2022 3:34:20PM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 10282022 10/28/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.b Page: 3 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ^ 5923 CS/ECON DEV CREDIT CARD SEPI N c Diversity Comission Film: Who We Ai >% 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 104.8'. Uptown Market: Facebook Ad a 001.000.61.558.70.41.40 66.8, 2 - Computer Cameras 3 001.000.61.557.20.35.00 87.6, Survey Monkey Subscription f° 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 464.1( Y Herald Subscription 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 127.4( u 8111 8111 MICHELE PARKER CREDIT CA E AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: 2 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 20.5z AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: o 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 17.2, > AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: o Q. 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 196.7� 0- TARGET: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: ; 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 56.6z N AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: 00 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 110.6, c WALMART: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIE: 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 95.0( .= DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY: PRE; 3 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 66.4'. TARGET: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: E 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 11.6 , FRED MEYER: PRESCHOOL SUPPL 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 26.4: Q WALMART: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIE: 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 23.9£ HOBBY LOBBY: PRESCHOOL: CRA 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 8.8' Page: 3 Packet Pg. 133 vchlist 10/28/2022 3:34:20PM Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.b Page: 4 Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun 10282022 10/28/2022 062693 US BANK (Continued) ^ AMAZON: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: N 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 84.1 f E WALMART: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIE; >, 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 c� 46.6z Q- TRADER JOES: PRESCHOOL SUPF 001.000.64.571.29.31.00 44.8, 3 9644 USPS PASSPORT POSTAGE c USPS passport postage f° 001.000.23.512.51.42.00 44.7,Y BID-9798 BID/ED! CREDIT CARD SEPTEMBEI aUi BID/Ed! - ReVitalize WA Conference U 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 219.2 1 E BID/Ed! - Facebook Ads 2 140.000.61.558.70.41.40 688.5, 4- BID/Ed! - USPS PO Box o 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 202.0( > BID/Ed! - My Edmonds News Ads o Q. 140.000.61.558.70.41.40 55.0( BID/Ed! - Zoom Subscription Septeml Q 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 16.5E N Total : 6,369.5A ao N 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank Bank total : 6,369.51, m L 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 6,369.5j '3 r c a� E t Q Page: 4 Packet Pg. 134 7.5.c vchlist 11 /03/2022 11:22:52AM Bank code : usbank Voucher Date Vendor 11032022 11/3/2022 062693 US BANK Voucher List City of Edmonds Page Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun . . ui 5245 MACHADO CC 5245 10-06-22 c 911 SUPPLY PATROL UNIFORMS E 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 2,112.1( BEST WESTERN - TRAINING LODG 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 319.6E .� FUEL FOR TRAINING 3 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 237.0" c 5245 MACHADO CC 5245 05-06-22 ca FUEL FOR TRANING Y U 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 53.5( t FUEL FOR TRAINING U 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 50.0( . 5245 MACHADO CC 5245 06-06-22 FOOD FOR HOMELESS CITIZEN c 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 14.3z '@ 5245 MACHADO CC 5245 07-06-22 0 FUEL FOR UOF ANALYSIS 0- 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 50.3" Q BIKE SHOES - BIKE UNIT 001.000.41.521.30.24.00 345.1 E N FUEL FOR UOF ANALYSIS M 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 59.5 09 BIKE PATROL SHORTS - BIKE UNIT 001.000.41.521.30.24.00 m 120.7E .3 5245 MACHADO CC 5245 08-08-22 FUEL FOR ASSESMENT CENTER c 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 50.2z E BEVERAGES FOR CREW DURING 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 U 16.9E +° 5245 MACHADO CC 9/6/22 Q FUEL FOR ASSESMENT CENTER 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 55.4, 5245 MACHADO 5245 CC - CREDIT CREDIT FROM BUDGET CAR OVEF Page: 1 Packet Pg. 135 vchlist 11 /03/2022 11:22:52AM Bank code: usbank Voucher Date Vendor 11032022 11/3/2022 062693 US BANK 1 Vouchers for bank code : usbank 1 Vouchers in this report Voucher List City of Edmonds 7.5.c Page: 2 Invoice PO # Description/Account Amoun (Continued) ui 001.000.41.521.40.43.00-2,465.0, Total: 1,020.1f Bank total : 1,020.1f a d L Total vouchers : 1,020.11 '3 c �a U a� t U E 2 U 4- 0 I� N N M O L 3 r c m E M U �a a Page: 2 Packet Pg. 136 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 SWR 2019 MIN EBFC 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 WTR ffic Calming 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s020 UTILITIES 019 Waterline Overlay 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 20 Guardrail Installations 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 STR R2020 Pedestria EODB Sm 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STR affic Calmi STR 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 STR 1020 Waterline Overlay i053 2021 Guardrail Installations E21AB i057 STR STR 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i062 STR a1 Seweriverlay Progra MIMI 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21CD i061 STM affic Calming = TR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21 CB i059 WTR rQ22 Guardrail Program STR 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 STR n Safety STR 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 STR SignaF, E22AA 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 STR 022 Traffic Calming Program M E22AB 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES k022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB 10M 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 STR naublic ROW ADA � Plan JbB 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SWR 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program STM 2023 Transportation Plan E23AA s032 STR 2023 Waterline Overlay ProgramINOWWT Q Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 137 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) 7.5.d Project Title 220th Adaptive 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OV 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements �6th Ave W at 212th St S1Antersection Improvements 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th FDA Curb Ramps Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing kallinger Regional Facility Pre -Design Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements -6tected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion Civic Center Playfield (Construction) Vvic Center Playfield (Design) I Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab EdmondsVars ater Elm St. Waterline Replacement ay Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating rwy 99 Gateway Revitalization Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) Lake Ballinger Associated Projects We Ballinger l Sewer SM Engineering Project Project Accounting Funding Number Number EBAB i028 STR E20CB i052 STR EBCA i029 STR E 1 CA EBCC i031 STR 6 c m E E9DA i040 STR co s022 i EODC i050 STR c E7DC i026 STR cYi m EOMA c551 PRK EOMA c ESJB c482 WTR C E41FE c455 �Ti Q. a E4MB c443 FAC a 21 FE Sim N E21JB c561 WTR c L ESKA c473 WTR z E22CE i067 STR 0- IL i068 STR d E4FD c436 STM �B J1hft Jdc Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 SWR rower Perrinville Creek Restorati E22FB Minor Sidewalk Program NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements terrinville Creek Recovery Study Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project hase 1 Vnnual Water Utility Replacement Project Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E6DD i017 STR E7FG Vm013 EONA s025 GF E7FA m105 E20FC c552 STM E22GA c566 SW R c549 WTR E21JA c558 ►611-0. Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 138 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 JLWTR_A Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 STM Ose 3 Sto ility Replac = E21 FD Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 STM nual Sewer Replacement Project NEOGA Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 SWR W Concrete Regrade & Drainage South Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 SWR Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 STIR �04 Adaptive System 236th-226 E22CG Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES tormwater Comp Plan Update Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 STIR Utility Funds reserve Policies Study s029 UTILITIES Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) c496 V PRK Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 PRK Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment ost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades Yost Park Infiltration Facility EOJB s026 WTR E21 FA c556 PRK Q Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 139 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number L020 Guardrail Installations -ML i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades 2020 Overlay Program 12020 Waterline Ova 2020 Pedestrian Task Force 020 Pedestrian Safety Program Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project Seaview Park Infiltration Facility PhasE Phase 2 Annual Storm Utilitv Replacer al Sewer Replace Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement P ost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOAB i047 STR i048 EOCA i042 STR W c EODA s024 STR m E Q. EODC i05O STR L M ject EOFB c547 STM c Y m oject EOJA c549 WTR 0 E Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 PRK o rvic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 GF Q. at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements 1C c368INV STR Q Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 STR a Ave Overlay (196 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 STR rrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements 2021 Traffic Calming 1021 Guardrail Installations 2021 Overlay Program t021 Waterline Overlay Program E21 AA E21 CA 21CB c552 i056 STR i051 STR WTR 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i06O SW R j?021 Stormwater Overlay Progra- Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 STR F-021 Pedestrian Task Force Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 PRK 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization wow E21 FB Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM t Replacemel qW1FD Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 STM I Sewer Replacement Project E21GA c559 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 SW R 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA =MWhase WT Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 140 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) 7.5.d Project Title Elm St. Waterline Replacement 2022 Signal Upgrades 2022 Traffic Calming Program ■2 Guardrail Program _ 2022 Overlay Program 022 Waterline Overlay Program 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program k022 Stormwater Overlay Program Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) !wy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) Engineering Project Numher E21JB E22AA Project Accounting Funding Number c561 WTR i070 STIR E22AB i071 STIR E22CA i063 STIR E22CC i065 STIR E22CD STIR E22CE i067 STIR SR-104 Adaptive System 236th-226th E22CG i069 STIR j?022 Pedestrian Safety program 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 STM Phase rower Perrinville Creek Restoration a157 STM Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 SWR hase 13 Waterline Replacement Project Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR e Policies Study E22NA * s029 _ UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s030 UTILITIES 2023 Public ROW ADA Transition Plan 023 Overlay Program 2023 Waterline Overlay Program IL023 Sewer Overlay Progra 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program -Creel.,Daylighting/E=nds Marsh Restoration Lake Ballinger Associated Projects ayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating `Standardketails Updates&. Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization itywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion Minor Sidewalk Program s032 STR E23AB s033 STIR E23CB i075 WTR E23CC E23CD i077 STM STM E4FD E4GC E5GB E5,113 E5KA c436 ■ c461 ■ s011 c482 c473 E6AA s014 E6DD i017 STM SWR SWR WTR WTR UTIL STIR STIR Q Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 141 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering #) Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number kt-ormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 SWR ssing En E7DC i026 INKM OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 STM PDES (Students Saving Salm E7FG m01 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR c Katerfront Development & Restoration (Construction) WPRK E co Q. Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 PRK L `waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) c 220th Adaptive E8AB i028 STR Me W tIntersection Improvements 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th E8CC i031 STR FDA Curb Ramps i033 2019 Storm Maintenance Project E8FC c525 STM c 1019 Sewerline Replacement Project E8GA 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement E8JA c523 WTR Q. 8jqw s020 UTILITIES a a 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 STR N Materline WTR c Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 STR N L Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design STM PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 FAC E Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 142 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 7.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1 DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements E1 CA c368 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4FE c455 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Funding STM STR STR STM STM FAC STM SWR WTR WTR SWR PRK WTR FAC SWR WTR STM PRK PRK STM STM SWR WTR PRK STM PRK WTR SWR STM WTR SWR STM STM WTR SWR STM STR ZA Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 143 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 7.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21 AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21 CB i059 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21 CC i060 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive System 236th-226th E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 Funding STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR WTR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR WTR SWR STM STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR ZA Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 144 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Accounting #) 7.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 STIR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SWR 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 STM NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 STM Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 PRK OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 STM Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB sol l SWR Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 STIR Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 STM 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s02O UTILITIES Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 STM 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 STIR Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 GF Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 STM Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s03O UTILITIES 2023 Transportation Plan E23AA s032 STIR 2023 Public ROW ADA Transition Plan E23AB s033 STIR ZA Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 145 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 7.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab E4MB c443 PW Concrete Regrade & Drainage South E9MA c502 Official Street Map & Sidewalk Plan Update EONA s025 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Design) E7MA c496 Civic Center Playfield (Design) EOMA c536 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Construction) E7MA c544 Civic Center Playfield (Construction) EOMA c551 Yost Park Infiltration Facility E21 FA c556 Waterfront Development & Restoration (Pre - Design) E7MA m103 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration E22FB a157 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration E4FC c435 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects E4FD c436 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station E4FE c455 2019 Storm Maintenance Project EBFC c525 Seaview Park Infiltration Facility Phase 2 EOFA c546 Phase 2 Annual Storm Utility Replacement Project EOFB c547 Perrinville Creek Flow Reduction Improvements E20FC c552 175th St. SW Slope Stabilization E21 FB c560 Phase 3 Storm Utility Replacement Project E21 FD c563 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Project E21 FE c564 Phase 4 Storm Utility Replacement Project E22FA c567 2021 Stormwater Overlay Program E21 CD i061 2023 Stormwater Overlay Program E23CD i077 NPDES (Students Saving Salmon) E7FG m013 OVD Slope Repair & Stabilization E7FA m105 Stormwater Comp Plan Update E6FD s017 Ballinger Regional Facility Pre -Design E9FA s022 Perrinville Creek Recovery Study E21 FC s028 Sunset Walkway Improvements E1DA c354 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements E1CA c368 Citywide Protected/Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion E6AB i015 Minor Sidewalk Program E6DD i017 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements E7DC i026 76th Ave W & 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements EBCA i029 84th Ave W Overlay from 220th to 212th EBCC i031 ADA Curb Ramps EBDB i033 2019 Traffic Calming E9AA i038 Funding FAC FAC GF PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK PRK STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STM STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR STR ZA Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 146 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 7.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Number Number Admiral Way Pedestrian Crossing E9DA i040 2020 Overlay Program EOCA i042 2020 Guardrail Installations EOAA i046 2020 Traffic Signal Upgrades EOAB i047 2020 Traffic Calming EOAC i048 2020 Pedestrian Safety Program EODB i049 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project EODC i050 2021 Overlay Program E21 CA i051 76th Ave Overlay (196th St. to OVD) E20CB i052 SR Revitalization Stage 2 (Medians, Gateway Signage & Hawk Signal) E20CE i055 2021 Traffic Calming E21 AA i056 2021 Guardrail Installations E21 AB i057 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave to 9th Ave E21 DA i058 2021 Pedestrian Task Force E21 DB i061 2022 Overlay Program E22CA i063 2022 Waterline Overlay Program E22CB i064 2022 Sewerline Overlay Program E22CC i065 2022 Stormwater Overlay Program E22CD i066 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3 (244th-238th) E22CE i067 Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4 (224th-220th) E22CF i068 SR-104 Adaptive System 236th-226th E22CG i069 2022 Signal Upgrades E22AA i070 2022 Traffic Calming Program E22AB i071 2022 Pedestrian Safety program E22DA i072 2022 Guardrail Program E22AC i073 2023 Overlay Program E23CA i074 Hwy 99 Gateway Revitalization E6AA s014 2020 Pedestrian Task Force EODA s024 2023 Transportation Plan E23AA s032 2023 Public ROW ADA Transition Plan E23AB s033 220th Adaptive EBAB i028 2020 Waterline Overlay EOCC i053 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study E4GC c461 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase III E6GB c488 2019 Sewerline Replacement Project EBGA c516 Phase 8 Annual Sewer Replacement Project EOGA c548 Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement Project E21 GA c559 Funding STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR STIR SWR SWR SWR SWR SWR ZA Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 147 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Funding) 7.5.d Engineering Project Project Title Project Accounting Funding Number Number Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Pipe Rating Services E21 GB c562 SWR Phase 10 Sewerline Replacement Project E22GA c566 SWR 2021 Sewer Overlay Program E21CC i06O SWR 2023 Sewer Overlay Program E23CC i076 SWR Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study ESGB s0l l SWR Standard Details Updates ESNA solo UTILITIES 2019 Utility Rate & GFC Update EBJB s02O UTILITIES Utility Funds reserve Policies Study E22NA s029 UTILITIES 2022 Utility Rate and GFC Study E22NB s03O UTILITIES Five Corners Reservoir Re -coating ESKA c473 WTR Dayton St. Utility Replacement Project (3rd Ave to 9th Ave) ESJB c482 WTR 2019 Waterline Replacement E7JA c498 WTR 2019 Swedish Waterline Replacement EBJA c523 WTR Phase 11 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project EOJA c549 WTR Phase 12 Annual Water Utility Replacement Project E21JA c558 WTR Elm St. Waterline Replacement E21JB c561 WTR Phase 13 Waterline Replacement Project E22JA c565 WTR 2019 Waterline Overlay E9CB i043 WTR 2021 Waterline Overlay Program E21CB i059 WTR 2023 Waterline Overlay Program E23CB i075 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades E22JB m160 WTR Yost & Seaview Reservoir Assessment EOJB s026 WTR ZA Revised 9/27/2022 Packet Pg. 148 7.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Regular Property Tax Ordinance for 2023 Tax Levy and EMS Levy Ordinance Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History Council discussed the Property Tax levies during Council meeting on November 1 and asked that the Ordinance for the Regular Levy and EMS Levy be placed on Consent. Staff Recommendation Approve attached Ordinances on Consent Narrative: Council discussed the Property Tax levies during Council meeting on November 1 and asked that the Ordinance for the Regular Levy and EMS Levy be placed on Consent. Attachments: 7. 2023 Draft Property Tax Ordinance_ Regular 0% 8. 2023 Draft Property Tax Ordinance —EMS 1% Packet Pg. 149 7.6.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY BY CONTINUING THE REGULAR PROPERTY TAX LEVY AT 100% OF THE CURRENT LEVY LIMIT, PRESERVING FUTURE LEVY CAPACITY, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the City of Edmonds has met and considered its budget for the calendar year 2023; and WHEREAS, the City's actual levy for the previous year was $10,623,168 for the regular property levy, and WHEREAS, the population of this district is greater than 10,000, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, that an increase in the regular property tax levy is hereby authorized for the levy to be collected in the 2023 tax year. The dollar amount of the increase over the actual levy amount from the previous year shall be $0 which is a percentage increase of 0% from the previous year. This increase is exclusive of additional revenue resulting from new construction, improvements to property, newly constructed wind turbines, solar, biomass, and geothermal facilities, and any increase in the value of state assessed property, any annexations that have occurred and refunds made. APPROVED: MAYOR, MICHAEL NELSON 2023 Regular Property Tax Ordinance Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 150 7.6.a ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, JEFFREY TARADAY M. CITY ATTORNEY, JEFFREY TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. a 2023 Regular Property Tax Ordinance Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 151 7.6.b ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE ANNUAL TAX LEVY BY CONTINUING THE EMS PROPERTY TAX LEVY AT 101 % OF THE CURRENT LEVY LIMIT, PRESERVING FUTURE LEVY CAPACITY, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. WHEREAS, the City Council and the City of Edmonds has met and considered its budget for the calendar year 2023; and WHEREAS, the City's actual levy for the previous year was $4,231,886 for the EMS property levy, and WHEREAS, the population of this district is greater than 10,000, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, that an increase in the EMS property tax levy is hereby authorized for the levy to be collected in the 2023 tax year. The dollar amount of the increase over the actual levy amount from the previous year shall be $42,319 which is a percentage increase of 1 % from the previous year. This increase is exclusive of additional revenue resulting from new construction, improvements to property, newly constructed wind turbines, solar, biomass, and geothermal facilities, and any increase in the value of state assessed property, any annexations that have occurred and refunds made. APPROVED: MAYOR, MICHAEL NELSON 2023 EMS Property Tax Ordinance Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 152 7.6.b ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, JEFFREY TARADAY CITY ATTORNEY, JEFFREY TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. 2023 EMS Property Tax Ordinance Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 153 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Potential Action on BD2 Designated Street Front Code Amendment (AMD2022-0003) Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Preparer: Michael Clugston Background/History During discussions about providing additional design standards for residential -only buildings in the BD2 zone in March 2022, some council members and public expressed concerns about having residential - only buildings within a mixed commercial zone and wished to pursue extending the designated street front "blue line" in some locations. This led to Council's adoption of Interim Ordinance 4262, including the revised Designated Street Front (DSF) map for the BD2 zone and the clarified BD use table. The interim ordinance (Exhibit 1) expires on December 1, 2022 unless permanent standards are adopted by that date. The Planning Board discussed the creation of a permanent revised designated street front map on June 8, 2022 and the Economic Development Commission did the same on July 20, 2022. Both groups held a joint meeting on the topic on August 10, 2022. At that meeting, the consensus was to extend the DSF line to all BD2 parcels to be more consistent with the Downtown Mixed Commercial designation in the Comprehensive Plan. However, there was a recognition that future mixed -use projects would be more difficult to develop from a financial and height limit perspective if the map change was adopted. The Planning Board held a public hearing on September 28 and recommended that Council adopt the revised DSF map and use table in Exhibit 2 and then consider revisions to ECDC 16.43 to facilitate construction of two floors of residential above ground floor commercial in the BD zones as part of the Comprehensive Plan update. This topic was reintroduced to Council on October 4. After a presentation by staff, Council discussed the DSF map proposed by the Planning Board and whether additional height should be part of the current discussion. Council concurred with the Planning Board that height should not be part of the current discussion but rather analyzed as part of Comprehensive Plan work. Regarding the location of the designated street front line, there was discussion about the increased extent of the DSF line and whether a full extension to all BD2 parcels was the appropriate outcome. To that end, staff created an additional map in Exhibit 8 that is intended to reflect of those discussions and after walking the area. The Council held a public hearing on October 25 and received testimony consistent with what had been previously provided regarding the extent of the DSF line at Planning Board and during Council comments. Staff Recommendation Packet Pg. 154 8.1 Review Exhibit 8 and determine the final extent of Designated Street Front line for the BD2 zone. Direct staff to prepare an ordinance for adoption on Council's consent agenda on November 15. Narrative The alternative DSF map in Exhibit 8 is revised for clarity. Five elements are shown: 1) The solid blue DSF line approved by Council in 2011. 2 The blue dotted areas that were included by Council in the interim DSF ordinance in June 2022. 3) The additional blue hatched areas representing the full extent of BD2 DSF coverage recommended by the Planning Board in September 2022. 4) The red lines are locations where staff suggests edits from full BD2 coverage based on walking the area. For corner lots where the DSF line already exists adjacent to a BD2 parcel, the line would not extend around the corner. Similarly, the proposed DSF would only extend on primarily commercial streets (ex. Main, Dayton, James, 2nd, 3rd) rather than side streets (ex. Bell, Durbin, Daley, Edmonds). In both cases, the intent is to have the building face the more important, commercial street, and allow for more flexibility on the side streets. 5) The yellow highlights are similar areas for edits provided by Council prior to the October 25 meeting based on walking the area. It should be noted that if the DSF line is not extended to all BD2 parcels, those parcels that are not adjacent would be able to support multifamily -only buildings. The recently adopted design standards for multifamily -only buildings in ECDC 22.43.080 would apply in that instance. The Comprehensive Plan provides the following guidance about the Downtown Mixed Commercial designation, which is implemented by the Downtown Mixed Commercial (BD2 zone) code in ECDC 16.43: To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses, with commercial entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development. The first floor of buildings must provide pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian -scale design features, differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. The design of interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual business spaces can be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. When the rear of a property adjoins a residentially -designated property, floor area that is located behind commercial street frontage may be appropriate for residential use. Where single family homes still exist in this area, development regulations should allow for 'live -work" arrangements where the house can accommodate both a business and a residence as principal uses. Attachments: Exhibit 1- Interim Ordinance 4262 BD2 Designated Street Front Exhibit 2 - Proposed Permanent BD2 Designated Street Front Map and BD Use Table Exhibit 3 - Otak Market Demand Analysis and BD2 Zoning Recommenations Exhibit 4 - Excerpt minutes 6.8 PB and 7.20 EDC Exhibit 5 - Excerpt PB-EDC minutes 8.10.22 Packet Pg. 155 8.1 Exhibit 6 - BD2 Designated Street Front —Council 10.4.22 Presentation Exhibit 7 - SEPA and Commerce Notices Exhibit 8 - Staff -revised draft Permanent Designated Street Front Map and Council highlights Exhibit 9 - 2022-09-28 Planning Board - Excerpt Minutes Exhibit 10 - 2022-10-04 City Council - Excerpt Minutes Packet Pg. 156 8.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.4262 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM ZONING FOR THE BD ZONES, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE ORDINANCE, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH ORDINANCES 4253, 4254, AND 4255. WHEREAS, on February 15, 2022, the city council adopted Ordinance 4247, which established a moratorium on the acceptance of building permit applications for BD2 zoned lots that do not front on a designated street front; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 4247 took effect on immediately on February 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium adopted by Ordinance 4247 was scheduled to terminate on April 15, 2022; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was extended six days by virtue of Ordinance 4253; and WHEREAS, the moratorium was extended two more times by virtue of Ordinances 4254 and 4255; and WHEREAS, the moratorium extensions were intended to allow planning staff and the city attorney sufficient time to research the history and legislative intent surrounding the BD zones and to carefully evaluate the intent behind the designated street front regulations and the ramifications of possible changes to those regulations, particularly in the BD2 zone; and WHEREAS, that research led to a heightened understanding of the intent behind the BD designated street front map and the BD permitted use table; and WHEREAS, the history suggests that what was seen in 2011 as the logical limits of the downtown commercial core may no longer fit the circumstances of 2022 due to the fact that certain blocks are showing vibrant commercial activity right up to the edges of the designed street front map; and WHEREAS, the city council would like to encourage the continued vibrancy of the downtown commercial core by expanding the limits of the designated street front map to require at least some commercial use of new structures within the expansion area; and WHEREAS, the city council would also like to remove an ambiguity in the permitted use table; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Packet Pg. 157 8.1.a Section 1. Designated Street Front Map Revision. Map 16.43-1, contained within ECDC 16.43.030, and entitled "Designated Street Front for BD Zones," is hereby amended to extend the designated street front as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth (extended street fronts are shown in crosshatch). Section 2. BD Permitted Use Table Revision. Table 16.43-1, contained in ECDC 16.43.020, entitled "Uses," is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in kedffetigh)• Section 3. Repeal of Moratorium. Ordinance 4247, which had established a moratorium on certain development in the BD2 zone, and Ordinances 4253, 4254, and 4255 which collectively extended that moratorium through June 2, 2022, are collectively hereby repealed. Section 4. Duration of Interim Regulations Adopted in Sections 1 and 2. The interim regulations adopted by sections 1 and 2 of this ordinance shall commence on the effective date of this ordinance. As long as the city holds a public hearing on this ordinance and adopts findings and conclusions in support of its continued effectiveness (as contemplated by Section 5 herein), this ordinance shall not terminate until six (6) months after the effective date, unless it is repealed sooner. Section 5. Public Hearing on Interim Standards. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220, the city council shall hold a public hearing on this interim ordinance within sixty (60) days of its adoption. In this case, the hearing shall be held on July 19, 2022 unless the city council, by subsequently adopted resolution, provides for a different hearing date. No later Packet Pg. 158 8.1.a than the next regular council meeting immediately following the hearing, the city council shall adopt findings of fact on the subject of this interim ordinance and either justify its continued effectiveness or repeal the interim ordinance. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be unconstitutional or unlawful by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: C CLE , SCO P SSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY JEFF TARADA FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: May 20, 2022 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: May 24, 2022 PUBLISHED: May 27, 2022 EFFECTIVE DATE: June 1, 2022 Packet Pg. 159 8.1.a ORDINANCE NO. 4262 m Q Packet Pg. 160 8.1.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4262 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 241h day of May, 2022, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 4262. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING INTERIM ZONING FOR THE BD ZONES, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE ORDINANCE, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH ORDINANCES 4253, 4254, AND 4255. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 24th day of May, 2022. CLERK,S PASSEY Packet Pg. 161 IIIIIII I 8.1.a Designated Street Front ""NpDALEY IN w a -51M �BD3 L WAY LE ST ALDE DALEY ST lz[= �a'C _ M Co= N G _ CO C O c O — Iw BELL � Q J >� ea c l m a I = n O D2 U V d ui L CO a " E um E= 7E WALNUT O ST �L yam+ C r x W c d E s Q I Packet Pg. 162 � Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 1/3 8.1.a 16.43.020 Uses. A. Table 16.43-1. Permitted Uses BD1 GBDI BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Commercial Uses Retail stores or sales A A A A A A Offices A X A A A A Legal/law firms A X A A A A Financial A X \ A A A Advising A X A A A A Mortgage A X A A A A Banks (without tellers) A X A A A A Accounting A X A A A A Counseling A X A A A A Architecture A X A A A A Engineering A X A A A A Advertising A X \ \ A \ Insurance A X \ \ A A Fitness related business (yoga/pilates/gym/fitness club) A X \ A A A Service uses A A«1 A A A A Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or services X X X X X X Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant, microbreweries/distilleries or food service establishment that also provides an on -site retail outlet open to the public A A A A A A Automobile sales and service X X A A X X Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents C X A A A X Printing, publishing and binding establishments C X A A A C Public markets licensed pursuant to provisions in Chapter 4.90 ECC' A A A A A A Residential Single-family dwelling A X A A A A Multiple dwelling unit(s) — must he-, Inented onsecend floor or behind first ^ [ feet fromside-walk or rights e f waysee ECDC 16.43.030.13 for further location standards A X A A A A Other Uses Bus stop shelters A A A A A A Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 A A A A A A The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 163 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 2/3 8.1.a Permitted Uses BD1 BDI GFSF0) BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Primary and high schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R) A X A A A A Local public facilities, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 C C C C A C Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 A A A A A A Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use B X B B B B Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this zone B X B B B X Commercial parking lots C X C C C X Wholesale uses X X X C X X Hotels and motels A A A A A A Amusement establishments C C C C C C Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions C X C C C C Drive-in/through businesses (businesses with drive through facilities) X X C A C X Laboratories X X C C C X Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a permitted use X X X C X X Day-care centers C X C C A C Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums X X C C A X Medical uses, e.g., A X A A A A Physicians A X A A A A Dental A X a A A A Optometrist (without retail) A X A A A A Physical therapy (without retail) A X A A A A Counseling A X \ 1 1 1 Other similar medical services A X \ 1 1 \ Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 A A A A A A Zoos and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 C X C C C A Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers X X C C A X Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 C C C C C C Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use D X D D D D Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC X X D D D D A = Permitted primary use B = Permitted secondary use The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 164 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 3/3 C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit X = Not permitted NOTES: (1) BD Zone GFSF = Ground Floor Designated Street Frontage (first 45 feet measured from public rights-of-way/sidewalk or parks/plazas) as defined under Edmonds Community Development Code Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front for BD Zones. Buildings set back 15 feet or more from the sidewalk shall not be subject to the BD Zone GFSF requirements. (2) Services — by appointment uses not providing open door retail/dining/entertainment functions as a primary component of the business are not allowed within BD 1 GFSF (first 45 feet). Open door businesses, e.g., real estate offices, banks (with tellers and no drive-throughs), nail and hair salons are allowed. For conditional uses listed in Table 16.43-1, the use may be permitted if the proposal meets the criteria for conditional uses found in Chapter 20.05 ECDC, and all of the following criteria are met: 1. Access and Parking. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the sidewalk. Vehicular access shall only be provided consistent with ECDC 18.80.060. When a curb cut is necessary, it shall be landscaped to be compatible with the pedestrian streetscape and shall be located and designed to be as unobtrusive as possible. 2. Design and Landscaping. The project shall be designed so that it is oriented to the street and contributes to the pedestrian streetscape environment. Fences more than four feet in height along street lot lines shall only be permitted if they are at least 50 percent open, such as a lattice pattern. Blank walls shall be discouraged, and when unavoidable due to the nature of the use shall be decorated by a combination of at least two of the following: a. Architectural features or details; b. Artwork; c. Landscaping. B. Exception to the BD GSFS. The owner of a building in the BD zone may apply for an exception from the restrictions on offices and medical uses within the designated street front for leasable space meeting all of the following criteria: 1. The space is less than 500 square feet; 2. The space does not contain direct access to the street or sidewalk; 3. The previous use was a nonconforming use (e.g., not retail); and 4. The space has been vacant for a period of more than six months. [Ord. 3955 § 1 (Att. A), 2014; Ord. 3932 § 6, 2013; Ord. 3918 § 1 (Att. 1), 2013; Ord. 3894 § 4, 2012; Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 165 8.1.a Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH955511 ORD NO 4262 4263 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 05/27/2022 and ending on 05/27/2022 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers Linda Phillips during all of said period. I�ivrary Public Stair: of 1lcaf• US hinritvn ray Appclrllnprti �,;liirkS E��&�2G25 The amount the fee for s h publication is `ORIMl6LJUFi Nun itill $34.40. ` Subscribed and sworn day of before, me on this Nofary Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds - LEGALADS 114101416 NICHOLASAALK Packet Pg. 166 8.1.a Classified Proof ORDINANCE SUMMARY of" City of Edmonds, Washiroon On me 241h day of Mayy, 2 ,'Q the Clly Cduft" of the Cily o} EdRtnncu, p'dB9ad If}a follkI drdlna 11. 1fr6 atmmades Of Bail Ordinances tonslsiing QI int are Provided "foftwe: OR iNAN NO.42B AN CROINANCE CIF I DS, WASHINGTON. ESTABLISHING INTERIM ZONING FOR THE BD ZONES, SETTING SIX MONTHS AS THE EFFECTIVE PERIOD OF THE ORDINANCE, AND LIFTING THE MORATORIUM THAT WAS ESTABLISHED THROUGH ORDINANCE 4247 AND EXTENDED THROUGH ORDINANCES 425a. 4264. AND 4255, AN ORDINANCE OF�NRNE 4 OS, WASH INGTON, AMENDING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 1830 FCDC, ENTITLED '$TO RMWATE R MANAGEMENT,' IN ITS ENT1RE7Y. The full Vaxl of these ordnance will be sent upon requrat DATED this 241h Day of May.2022. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Published: May 27, 2022- EDH956511 Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 05/27/2022 01:23:13 pm Page: 2 Packet Pg. 167 IIIIIII I 8.1.b Designated Street Front ""NpDALEY SIN J 1 W a -3= �BD3 L WAY LE ST ALDE DALEY ST IZ= w > aC 0 o — o = a— o — a _ d z� 1 BELL > QL ,� D2 � n W� laCD o L a — ' CO CD a� °m E E= .r CD a WALNUT .0 ST d N O Q O L IL CM k W C d E I Packet Pg. 168 1 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 1/3 8.1.b 16.43.020 Uses. A. Table 16.43-1. Permitted Uses BD1 GBDI BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Commercial Uses Retail stores or sales A A A A A A Offices A X A A A A Legal/law fines A X A A A A Financial A X \ A A A Advising A X A A A A Mortgage A X A A A A Banks (without tellers) A X A A A A Accounting A X A A A A Counseling A X A A A A Architecture A X A A A A Engineering A X A A A A Advertising A X \ \ A \ Insurance A X \ \ A A Fitness related business (yoga/pilates/gym/fitness club) A X A \ A A Service uses A A(2) A A A A Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or services X X X X X X Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant, microbreweries/distilleries or food service establishment that also provides an on -site retail outlet open to the public A A A A A A Automobile sales and service X X A A X X Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents C X A A A X Printing, publishing and binding establishments C X A A A C Public markets licensed pursuant to provisions in Chapter 4.90 ECC' A A A A A A Residential Single-family dwelling A X A A A A Multiple dwelling unit(s) — must he losated Rn second FlRo_ or behind first 45 feet fron...:aeival . or rights 4�see ECDC 16.43.030.13 for further location standards A X A A A A Other Uses Bus stop shelters A A A A A A Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 A A A A A A The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 169 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 2/3 8.1.b Permitted Uses BD1 GFSF(') BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Primary and high schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R) A X A A A A Local public facilities, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 C C C C A C Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 A A A A A A Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use B X B B B B Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this zone B X B B B X Commercial parking lots C X C C C X Wholesale uses X X X C X X Hotels and motels A A A A A A Amusement establishments C C C C C C Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions C X C C C C Drive-in/through businesses (businesses with drive through facilities) X X C A C X Laboratories X X C C C X Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a permitted use X X X C X X Day-care centers C X C C A C Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums X X C C A X Medical uses, e.g., A X A A A A Physicians A X A A A A Dental A X a A A A Optometrist (without retail) A X A A A A Physical therapy (without retail) A X A A A A Counseling A X \ 1 1 1 Other similar medical services A X \ 1 1 \ Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 A A A A A A Zoos and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 C X C C C A Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers X X C C A X Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 C C C C C C Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use D X D D D D Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC X X D D D D A = Permitted primary use B = Permitted secondary use The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 170 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 3/3 8.1.b C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit X = Not permitted NOTES: (1) BD Zone GFSF = Ground Floor Designated Street Frontage (first 45 feet measured from public rights-of-way/sidewalk or parks/plazas) as defined under Edmonds Community Development Code Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front for BD Zones. Buildings set back 15 feet or more from the sidewalk shall not be subject to the BD Zone GFSF requirements. (2) Services — by appointment uses not providing open door retail/dining/entertainment functions as a primary component of the business are not allowed within BD 1 GFSF (first 45 feet). Open door businesses, e.g., real estate offices, banks (with tellers and no drive-throughs), nail and hair salons are allowed. For conditional uses listed in Table 16.43-1, the use may be permitted if the proposal meets the criteria for conditional uses found in Chapter 20.05 ECDC, and all of the following criteria are met: 1. Access and Parking. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the sidewalk. Vehicular access shall only be provided consistent with ECDC 18.80.060. When a curb cut is necessary, it shall be landscaped to be compatible with the pedestrian streetscape and shall be located and designed to be as unobtrusive as possible. 2. Design and Landscaping. The project shall be designed so that it is oriented to the street and contributes to the pedestrian streetscape environment. Fences more than four feet in height along street lot lines shall only be permitted if they are at least 50 percent open, such as a lattice pattern. Blank walls shall be discouraged, and when unavoidable due to the nature of the use shall be decorated by a combination of at least two of the following: a. Architectural features or details; b. Artwork; c. Landscaping. B. Exception to the BD1 GSFS. The owner of a building in the BD zone may apply for an exception from the restrictions on offices and medical uses within the designated street front for leasable space meeting all of the following criteria: 1. The space is less than 500 square feet; 2. The space does not contain direct access to the street or sidewalk; 3. The previous use was a nonconforming use (e.g., not retail); and 4. The space has been vacant for a period of more than six months. [Ord. 3955 § 1 (Att. A), 2014; Ord. 3932 § 6, 2013; Ord. 3918 § 1 (Att. 1), 2013; Ord. 3894 § 4, 2012; Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 171 8.1.c ULong Bay Enterprises, Inc. Real Estate Consulting May 23, 2022 MEMORANDUM To: City of Edmonds Susan McLaughlin Development Services Department Director From: Long Bay Enterprises, Inc. Cynthia Berne Principal/Broker Subject: Submarket Demand Analysis for Commercial uses in the BD2 zone and surrounding Downtown zones. Per your request we have performed a cursory market demand analysis regarding commercial uses in the BD2 zone and immediate surrounding area of Downtown Edmonds. We have added some general information about the current and recent history for the demand of rental multi- family units. (See attached map depicting target areas referenced below.) The commercial space analysis, approximate target area, borders Daley Street to the north, a zigzag to the waterfront and 3rd Ave to the west, Holly Drive to the south and 7th Ave to the east. The multi -family rental information, approximate target area, borders Daley Street to the north, waterfront to the west, Pine Street to the south and 7th Ave to the east. Market demand for any use, does not limit itself to submarket zones, but more from a sense of "place" for a given particular use. For instance, a retailer looking to locate in Downtown Edmonds will focus on zones that allow the proposed use but will not target one zone. Rental rates, parking availability, visibility to auto and pedestrian traffic are examples of criteria that may go into a decision on where to locate rather than a specific zone. Submarket Demand Analysis (studying a very small micro area) does not lend itself to the general real estate data bases for all the statistical information. Many data bases are city wide driven, and or regional analysis. We pulled information from several sources and then extrapolated data for the micro area of study. This is not an exact science, as there may be a pocket of data missed for the micro market area, but the sources below offer a comprehensive look at Downtown Edmonds. Long Bay Enterprises, Inc. 320 Dayton Street, # 200 Edmonds, WA 98020 (206) 937-9536 www.longbayenterprises.com Packet Pg. 172 List of sources used 8.1.c Commercial Broker Association multiple listing data base Northwest Multiple Listing Service data base Snohomish County Assessor's web site OfficeSpace.com Hotpads.com Loopnet.com Apartment.com Rent.com Trulia.com Walking the target area for signage of space available that is not listed in any of the above COMMERCIAL SPACE DEMAND DATA RETAIL MARKET Current available Average Days on Market (DOM) all SF types of spaces spaces Historical Days on Market — N/A 255 DOM (Historical) Last 3.5 years General Retail 5 276 DOM Current Vacant — Not listed: 1 N/A C'est La Vie Business appears closed — 1 N/A Not listed: Bop N Burger OFFICE MARKET all SF types of spaces Current available spaces Average Days on Market (DOM) Historical Days on Market — N/A 230 DOM (Historical) Last 3.5 years 1000 to 2000 sf spaces are 7 307 DOM (Current) what currently is available MULTI -FAMILY RENTAL UNITS DEMAND DATA There are approximately 425 muti family rental units in the target area. The largest number of units are 2-bedrooms, which account for approximately 56% of the total units. One -bedroom units represent approximately 34% of the total unit supply and the remainder 10% are 3 bedrooms and studios. Currently there are approximately 5 units (three 2-bedroom units and two 1-bedroom units) available in the target area, which equate to a 1% vacancy rate. A 5-6% vacancy rate is considered a strong and balanced market for Lessors and Lessees. From the small amount of information, we could gather from our sources, we extrapolated the average DOM to be approximately 20. DEMAND CONCLUSION The data above demonstrates that historically and currently the retail market has been stable, strong, and even robust at times. The closeness of the historic and current DOM is a good indicator of a stable market. The inventory is low in the retail sector but not what is considered a Lessor's Market. The office data shows a stable and at times strong market. The retail Long Bay Enterprises, Inc. Packet Pg. 173 8.1.c market is the stronger of the two commercial uses analyzed, using the indicator of DOM as the key factor. There are many other indicators to analyze but this study did not lend itself to the next layer of research, that being calculating the full office and retail inventory in the entire submarket. The additional information this next layer of research would provide is the vacancy rate of each commercial use. The vacancy rate is a valid indicator but is more informative to a prospective developer than prospective tenants or zoning criteria review. The addition of Main Street Commons, to the commercial district of Downtown Edmonds, is worth noting as a very large influx of retail uses that add to the current inventory. The absorption rate of all the retail space in this new development will be a significant indicator of the strength and demand for retail space. In many ways it is a project that will generate more interest in this corridor, but it could also affect the inventory enough that the demand will slow due to this new supply of spaces. The multi -family information is more cursory in nature as it was not an initial request of this analysis. It is an important factor in the overall review of zoning uses and requirements and therefore we added this general information to help with the broader discussions. The biggest take away from the multi -family information is the obvious short supply and high demand for these rental units. We did not evaluate the affordability of the current market inventory, but a brief look indicates that the extremely low inventory is driving the rent rates very high and therefore limiting those that can afford to live in the Downtown Edmonds area. FEASABILITY OF MIXED -USE DEVELOPMENT IN THE BD2 ZONE The results of the Otak massing development analysis identifies that the mixed -use alternative reduces the number of multi -family units significantly in comparison to all residential unit alternative. Due to the cumbersome height requirements for the commercial space and height limit of the entire building, the project loses an entire floor of residential units, reducing the number of units from 15 to 8. The commercial space is approximately 1900 SF which could render 3 small -size retail spaces. The risk associated with the long absorption time for the retail spaces (see chart above average DOM at 276) coupled with the drastic reduction in rental residential units would make the mixed -use project not feasible for the average boutique developer. There are several factors to consider for a project of this type to be determined feasible; below are a few examples 1. Absorption rate —this is a critical element of the pro -forma analysis that determines financial feasibility (different types of pro forma analysis can be based on profit margin, internal rate of return or return on investment). The absorption rate assumptions are based on historical DOM for the proposed use and projections as to what the future absorption could be. Absorption rates are directly related to the risk of the given project 2. Cost of asset management after the project is complete- a mixed use project requires a more complete property management system than a single use project. 3. The economies of scale — this is directly related to maximizing the highest and best use of a property, which includes the greatest density possible to spread all the cost of developing and maintaining the property over the greatest number of income- producing units. 4. Construction Costs- these vary significantly depending on the complexity of the site, the size of the development company itself, and the market cost of labor and materials Long Bay Enterprises, Inc. Packet Pg. 174 8.1.c Edmonds Map Target Area 1: Edmonds BD1,2,3,4 & 5 Designated areas, defined by blue outlined area Target Area 2. Expanded Search area around downtown core area, defined by yellow highlight Long Bay Enterprises, Inc. Packet Pg. 175 8.1.c Otak Memorandum To: Cynthia Berne, Long Bay Enterprises From: Sierra Carson, AICP Candidate, Chad Weiser Copies: File Date: May 23, 2022 Subject: Edmonds BD2 Zoning Analysis —Recommendations Project No.: 20793 Purpose The purpose of this memorandum is to provide recommendations to Edmonds City Staff and City Council on potential code changes to the BD2 zoning regulations. The findings of this analysis indicate no significant revisions to the code are required, although some minor refinements in code language and standards should be considered. The recommendations include suggested code changes to the requirements for the BD2 zone to address inconsistencies and to improve the ease of development for owners and developers in achieving the intent of the allowances within the zone. Summary of 13132 Zoning Development in the BD2 zone is regulated through the development standards located in Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) Chapter 16.43. New buildings in the BD2 zone located along a Designated Street Front must have a street level floor with commercial uses at a minimum 12 foot height. New buildings located outside of the Designated Street Front are not required to have commercial uses on the first floor and may be multifamily residential (only) buildings. New buildings in the BD2 zone are limited to 30 feet in height. Height is defined as the vertical distance from the average level of the undisturbed soil of a site covered by a structure to the highest point of the structure. Buildings located along a Designated Street Front are allowed to place commercial storefronts below grade with limitations as defined in the code. No off-street parking is required for new commercial or retail uses, and one parking space is required per multifamily residential unit. Public open space is required in new developments on lots of 12,000 square feet or more or on lots with 120 feet or more of street frontage. Please reference the Edmonds BD2 Zoning Memo for additional information. Summary of Comparable Cities Other Puget Sound communities similar to Edmonds, such as Mukilteo and Snohomish, have similar downtown zoning requirements as Edmonds, although Edmonds has more subsets of their Downtown Business District zoning. Mukilteo and Snohomish are similar in size and scale to Edmonds including their downtown areas. In general, the Downtown Business District zoning is very comparable between all three communities including permitted uses and bulk/dimensional standards. However, there are some minor, but notable differences. Both Mukilteo and Snohomish have higher maximum height requirements (35 11241 Willows Road NE, Suite 200 1 Redmond, WA 98052 1 Phone 425.822.4446 1 otak.com I: Itemplkernenlbdlcouncil 05.17.221final 22 0523_edmonds bd2 zoning analysisrecommendations.docx Packet Pg. 176 Edmonds BD2 Zoning Analysis —Recommendations Page 2 of May 23, 2022 and 40 feet respectively) than Edmonds, but in comparison, require more off-street parking for both commercial and residential uses. Mukilteo restricts residential development on the ground floor of new buildings in their downtown business zone similar to Edmonds BD2 regulations for Designated Street Front, while Snohomish has no restrictions on the location of residential development. Please reference the Zoning Memo — Additional Research on Comparable Cities for additional information. Recommendations Permitted Uses Permitted uses in the BD2 zone are listed in ECDC 16.43.020. No changes to specific permitted uses are recommended. It is recommended to revise the use table ECDC 16.43-1 to clarify where multi -dwelling housing is allowed to eliminate the inconsistencies in language regarding the allowance of all residential development in the BD2 zone when not on a Designated Street Front. Site Development Standards (setbacks, height) Site development standards for the BD2 zone are located in ECDC 16.43.030.(A). Existing regulations limit building development in the BD2 zone to 30 feet in height. The analysis shows that a 30-foot building height with a required 12-foot first floor height puts constraints on mixed use development within the downtown core. Requiring a 12-foot commercial first floor along with a 30-foot height limit, constrains the ability of a developer to build three stories on many sites within this zone. It is possible to develop a 3- story mixed use building while meeting the code requirements for the BD2 zone if the site has sloping topography and the commercial space is, in part, set below existing adjacent grade. By using the average grade methodology for measuring building height, as defined in the code, developers have been able to achieve a third floor. The addition of a third floor to a mixed use development project within the existing height limits often results in needing to build a partially subterranean first floor. The below grade commercial space impacts the aesthetics, marketability and desirability of street front commercial as well as the general streetscape appearance in the downtown business district. Examples of developments in the downtown business district where these regulations have impacted development have been included for reference, see Figures 1, 2, and 3 below. Figure 1. Three story development with a below grade commercial entrance. I: Itemplkernenlbdlcouncil 05.17.221final 22 0523_edmonds bd2 zoning analysisrecommendations.docx Packet Pg. 177 Edmonds BD2 Zoning Analysis —Recommendations Page 3 of 4 May 23, 2022 It is recommended a minor increase in allowed building height be considered in the BD2 zone, as well as any other BD zones similarly affected. This height increase would create more flexibility for a developer to design a 3-story mixed use development. An increase of two (2) to five (5) feet in building height would encourage more 3-story mixed use redevelopment by making a third story feasible on more sites and allowing already feasible sites to be developed in a manner that avoids less desirable subterranean first floor commercial space. This recommended change is intended to make the Designated Street Front commercial requirement as feasible to integrate into a 3-story development as developing an all - residential development. Any increases in height should be crafted with code language that limits all BD2 development to no more than 3-stories in height. Figure 2. Three story development with a below grade commercial entrance. I: Itemplkernenlbdlcouncil 05.17.221final 22 0523_edmonds bd2 zoning analysisrecommendations.docx Packet Pg. 178 Edmonds BD2 Zoning Analysis —Recommendations Page 4 of May 23, 2022 a` G.W, Fri Vo S Ek La Y Ian 6d+ W Figure 3 — A multi -family residential building (left) adjacent to a Mixed Use Building (right) showing the 3-foot height difference in the first floor Designated Street Front Regulations for the Designated Street Front are located in ECDC 16.43.030.(B). The extent of Designated Street Front as reflected on the Designated Street Front Map (EDCD Map 16.43-1), could be expanded based on the discretion of the City Council and the City's goals for the downtown business district. An expansion of the extents of Designated Street Front should be addressed in the context of the other noted recommendations. Off -Street Parking Off street parking regulations in the BD2 zone are located in ECDC 16.43.030.(D) The existing off-street parking regulations are more flexible than comparable cities and do not negatively impact the ability to develop parcels in the BD2 zone. As long as the community is not experiencing a negative impact from a less stringent parking requirement in the downtown area, no changes are recommended for this requirement. Open Space Open space regulations in the BD2 zone are located in ECDC 16.43.030.(E). No changes are recommended for the Open Space regulations. I: Itemplkernenlbdlcouncil 05.17.221final 22 0523_edmonds bd2 zoning analysisrecommendations.docx Packet Pg. 179 ALLEY ACCESS rr to PARKING 22 I ran QI N a CL a ISTAIRS I J STAIRS A A EL, DESIGNATED STREET FRONT GARAGE RESIDENTIAL UNITS: I BR: 12 2BR: 7 3BR: 3 TOTAL: 22 2 BR 2 BR 921 SF 927 SF STAIRS 1 BR 1 BR 670 SF 625 SF 1 BR 1 BR 625 SF 625 SF STAIRS ® EL. 3BR 1,440 SF LOBBY 2811 2BR 921 SF 927 SF STAIRS 1 BR 670 SF 2 6R f 970 SF 1 BR 625 SF STAIRS EL. 1 BR 700 SF 3 ER 1.325 SF GROUND LEVEL 2N❑ FLOOR GARAGE PARKINGI: (1 STALL PER UNIT REQUIRED) TOTAL: 22 BUILDING HEIGHT: GARAGE: BELOW GRADE FRRST FLOOR: 9' SECOND FLOOR: 9' THIRD FLOOR: 9' PARAPET: 3' TOTAL HEIGHT: 30' Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning / Residential Option 3-Story Over Below Grade Garage 2BR 2BR 921 SF 927 SF STAIRS 1 BR 1 BR 685 SF 600 SF 1 BR 1 BR $00 SF 600 SF 3BR I STAIRS EL. 1. 1 BR 1,200 SF 570 SF 3RD FLOOR a OPTION 1 Packet Pg. 180 8.1.c € E IDENTI L OILO fps WS oz Csfal c Packet Pg. 181 ALLEY ACCESS 3BR I 1.420 SF STAIRS N 0 I O GARAGE PARKING A 16 0 J U J OW 2 BR 670 SF A < I w I STAIRS 1 STARS I SF j 1 BR 8Y I 657SF L1.260 J DESIGNATED STREET FRONT GROUND LEVEL RESIDENTIAL OPTION: 1 BR: 6 2BR: 6 3BR: 3 TOTAL: 15 2BR 28R 927 SF 927 SF 3BR 1.420 SF STAIRS STAIRS 2BR 2BR 770 SF 770 SF 2 BR 970 SF 2BR 28R 770 SF 770 SF STAIRS 7 2BR 1 BR 2BR 770 SF W SF 770 SF 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR GARAGE PARKING1: (1 STALL PER UNIT REQUIRED) TOTAL: 16 BUILDING HEIGHT: FIRST FLOOR: 10' SECOND FLOOR: 9' THIRD FLOOR: 9' PARAPET: 2' TOTAL HEIGHT: 30' Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning / Residential Option 3-Story '-' OPTIO Packet Pg. 182 RESIDENTIAL 114LO IDS 46 J OPTION 2 Packet Pg. 183 � I to STAIRS 0 0 I GARAGE `q DARKING I 12 LOU a BIKE w - 1 COMMERCIAL 1,900 SF i i DESIGNATED STREET FRONT 2 8R 2 RR 925 SF 925 5F STAIRS 1 RR 560 SF 1 BR f 650 SF 1 RR 56G SF 1 BR 555 SF STAIRS •, I I . 3 RR 3 BR-1 ' R 1,411 SF 1,14RSF GROUND LEVEL 2ND FLOOR COMMERCIAL: 1,900 SF GARAGE PARKINGI: (1 STALL PER UNIT REQUIRED) TOTAL: 12 RESIDENTIAL UNITS: BUILDING HEIGHT: NOTE: 1 BR: 4 FIRST FLOOR: 12' Financial feasibility of a two-story with commercial may be 2BR: 2 SECOND FLOOR: 8' questionable. Third floor may not be feasible due to 30' height 3BR: 2 PARAPET: 2' limitation and specific site constraints. TOTAL: 8 TOTAL HEIGHT: 22' Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning l Commercial Option 2-Story a O Packet Pg. 184 RESIDENTIAL litpixop wolvoolw 1, P10%. C,P d2 wsv ; W� Packet Pg. 185 ALLEY ACCESS 28R 213R. 28R 2BR I 1,000 SF 925 SF 1,000 SF 925 SF rLLq I STAIRS STAIRS STAIRS 0 I 1 BR 1 BR GARAGE CD "R � PARKING 755 755 14 Q 2 BR 2 SR W + 1,Oflo Sr 1,Opp SF ~ w Uj J i a ~ m W 1 BR 1 BR STARS � STAIRS l55 STAIRS 755 LOBBY 1 \ 3 BR 3 BR UC1.0Mr0r RCIAL + 1,140 SF 755R 1,140 SF I5 R 900 SF 1 DESIGNATED STREET FRONT GROUND LEVEL 2ND FLOOR 3R❑ FLOOR COMMERCIAL OPTION: GARAGE PARKINGI: (1 STALL PER UNIT REQUIRED) 1,900 SF TOTAL: 14 RESIDENTIAL UNITS: BUILDING HEIGHT: NOTE: 1 BR: 6 GROUND LEVEL: 12' Third floor may not be feasible due to 30' height limitation and 2BR: 6 FIRST FLOOR: 8' specific site constraints. An additional 2' in height allows for a 3BR: 2 SECOND FLOOR: 8' more traditional building design that would front the street with PARAPET: 2' commercial at grade with fronting public sidewalk. TOTAL: 14 TOTAL HEIGHT 32' Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning 1 Commercial Option 3-Story OPTION -d Packet Pg. 186 RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL c m 0 IL Packet Pg. 187 8.1.c Otak Memorandum To: Cynthia Berne, Long Bay Enterprises From: Sierra Carson, AICP Candidate, Otak Copies: Chad Weiser, Otak Date: May 19, 2022 Subject: Edmonds BD2 Zoning Analysis —Additional Research on Comparable Cities Project No.: 20793 Purpose The purpose of this memo is to provide a short summary of the approaches comparable cities to Edmonds have taken to zone their historic downtowns. A summary of both the City of Snohomish's Historic Business District zone and Mukilteo's Downtown Business zone have been provided below. A comparison table, showing at a glance the differences between the approaches Snohomish, Mukilteo, and Edmonds have taken in their downtown zoning, has been provided, see Table 1 below. Table 1. Research Comparison Table Setbacks (NOTE: may differ for developments adjacent to residential zones) Max Height Multi Family allowed Commercial Space requirements Open space requirements Special Parking requirements Commercial parking Edmonds BD2 Zone 0' 30' Yes, but restricted on `Designated Frontage Streets' Yes, first 45' of the bottom floor must be commercial Yes (on lots larger than 12,000 or with a frontage of over 120 ft) Yes No parking required for commercial or retail uses. 1 parking space required for every 500 Mukilteo DB Zone 0' Required if necessary to provide adequate 10' wide sidewalk 35' No, no multifamily only structures allowed Yes, the first portion of the street level floor of all structures must be commercial No No Parking varies per use. 4.5 to 5 spaces required per 1,000 sqft of gfa for commercial or retail uses Snohomish HBD Zone 0' 40' Yes, no restrictions No, no requirements No Yes 1 parking space required for every 400 sgft of new commercial, retail, or service uses. 11241 Willows Road NE, Suite 200 1 Redmond, WA 98052 1 Phone 425.822.4446 1 otak.com k:Iprojech20700120793105 documentslreports122_0519_edmonds bd2 zoning analysis —additional research on comparable cities .docx Packet Pg. 188 Page 2 of 2 Edmonds BD2 Zoning Analysis —Additional Research on Comparable Cities May 19, 2022 sqft of uses that are not commercial or residential. Residential 1 parking space 1.5 spaces per studio 2 spaces for two - parking required per and one -bedroom units, 2 bedroom dwellings or multifamily unit. spaces for all other units, larger, 1.5 spaces per plus 1 space for every one -bedroom dwelling, four units for guest 1.2 spaces per dwelling parking unit per studio unit Snohomish Downtown Zoning Summary Snohomish has designated their downtown zoning district, the 'Historic Business District' (HBD). Snohomish allows both multifamily buildings and mixed -use buildings anywhere within the HBD, but has a max residential density of 18 dwelling units per acre. Snohomish has no setback requirements for buildings in the HBD zone and has a max height of 40 feet. There are no open space requirements for new structures in the HBD zone. New buildings within the HBD zone containing commercial, retail, or services uses, must supply one off street parking space for every 400 square feet of gross floor area. Multifamily dwelling units must provide parking based on unit size, 2 spaces for two -bedroom dwellings or larger, 1.5 spaces per one -bedroom dwelling, and 1.2 spaces per dwelling unit per studio unit. Mukilteo Downtown Zoning Summary Mukilteo has designated their downtown zoning district 'Downtown Business' zone (DB). Multifamily buildings are not permitted in the DB zone, residential units are only allowed as part of a mixed -use building. The front portion of the street level of all structures must be occupies by commercial/retail uses. Residential uses may be located above, behind or below commercial/retail uses. In the event that a lot depth is less than 60 feet, the entire street level of the structure must be a commercial/retail use. Mukilteo has designated certain streets as 'pedestrian -oriented street' in their downtown business district subarea plan and has codified design standards pertaining to pedestrian access for structures along these streets. All structures in the DB zone are encouraged to build right up to the lot line, unless a setback is required for adequate pedestrian access, public space, or outdoor dining areas. The max height in the DB zone is 35 feet. There are no special parking regulations for the DB zone, parking is required based on the proposed use, which can vary from 4.5 to 5 spaces required per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Residential uses must provide one and one-half spaces per studio and one -bedroom units and two spaces for all other units, plus one space for every four units for guest parking. k:Iprojech20700120793105 documentslreports122_0519_edmonds bd2 zoning analysis —additional research on comparable cities .docx Packet Pg. 189 8.1.c Otak Memorandum To: Cynthia Berne, Long Bay Enterprises From: Sierra Carson, AICP Candidate, Otak Copies: Chad Weiser, Otak Date: May 19, 2022 Subject: Edmonds Downtown Business Zone BD2 Zoning Memorandum Project No.: 20793 Zoning Analysis The purpose of this zoning memorandum is to provide a summary of the development regulations in the city of Edmonds BD2 zoning district. This summary will support the planning team with development of designing yield alternatives analyzing the effects of zoning changes on housing yields. Background The purpose of the Downtown Business (BD) zone is to: ■ Promote downtown Edmonds as a setting for retail, office, entertainment and associated businesses supported by nearby residents and the larger Edmonds community, and as a destination for visitors from throughout the region. ■ Define the downtown commercial and retail core along streets having the strongest pedestrian links and pedestrian -oriented design elements, while protecting downtown's identity. ■ Identify supporting arts and mixed -use residential and office areas which support and complement downtown retail use areas. Provide for a strong central retail core at downtown's focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the area surrounding this retail core area. ■ Focus development between the commercial and retail core and the Edmonds Center for the Arts on small-scale retail, service, and multifamily residential uses. The "downtown business" zone is subdivided into five distinct subdistricts, each intended to implement specific aspects of the comprehensive plan that pertain to the Downtown Waterfront Activity Center. Each subdistrict contains its own unique mix of uses and zoning regulations, as described in this chapter. The five subdistricts are: ■ BD1 — Downtown Retail Core; ■ BD2 — Downtown Mixed Commercial; ■ BD3 — Downtown Convenience Commercial; ■ BD4 — Downtown Mixed Residential; ■ BD5 — Downtown Arts Corridor 11241 Willows Road NE, Suite 200 1 Redmond, WA 98052 1 Phone 425.822.4446 1 otak.com k: project120700120793105 documentsVeportsVinal_22_0519 edmonds bd2 zoning memo.docx Packet Pg. 190 Edmonds Downtown Business Zone BD2 Zoning Memorandum Page 2 of 6 May 19, 2022 The extent of the BD2 zone is show below in Figure 1 1 1 1 1 I!I Downtown Business * Historic Sites Sites on Edmonds Register of Historic Places L� Rezones Contract Rezones (contractual requirements apply) PRD PRD - Planned Residential Development Figure 1. Excerpt from City of Edmonds Zoning Map Allowed Uses Permitted uses in the BD2 zone are listed in EDCD Table 18.43-1 and provided below for reference. Permitted uses are split into three use categories, Commercial, Residential, and Other Uses. Some other uses may require a conditional use permit. Uses that are only allowed as secondary to a permitted or conditional use are marked with *. Commercial Permitted Uses ■ Retail store or sales • Offices ■ Service uses, including dining or entertainment uses ■ Automobile sales and services ■ Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant, microbreweries/distilleries or food service establishment that also provides an on -site retail outlet open to the public ■ Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents k:Iproject120700120793105 documentsVeports;Vinal_22_0519 edmonds bd2 zoning memo.docx Packet Pg. 191 Page 3 of 6 Edmonds Downtown Business Zone BD2 Zoning Memorandum May 19, 2022 ■ Printing, publishing and binding establishments ■ Public markets licensed pursuant to provisions in Chapter 4.90 ECC Residential Permitted Uses ■ Single-family dwelling ■ Multiple dwelling unit(s)' Other Uses Permitted ■ Bus stop shelters ■ Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 ■ Primary and high schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R) ■ Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 ■ Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use* ■ Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this zone* ■ Hotels and motels ■ Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 Other Conditional Uses ■ Commercial parking lots ■ Local public facilities, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 ■ Amusement establishments ■ Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions ■ Drive-in/through businesses (businesses with drive through facilities) • Laboratories ■ Day-care centers • Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums ■ Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 ■ Zoos and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 ■ Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers ■ Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 ■ Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use* ■ Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC* Site Development Standards Site development standards for the BD2 zone are listed in ECDC Table 16.43-2. There are no minimum lot area requirements and no minimum front, side, or rear setbacks. The maximum building heightz is 30 1 A Memorandum of Legislative Intent, dated April 13, 2022, clarified that the current adopted code never intended to limit the location of multifamily housing outside of the Designated Street Front. 2 Pursuant to EDCD 21.40.030, height means the average vertical distance from the average level of the undisturbed soil of the site covered by a structure to the highest point of the structure. k:Iproject120700120793105 documentsVeportsVinal_22_0519 edmonds bd2 zoning memo.docx Packet Pg. 192 Edmonds Downtown Business Zone BD2 Zoning Memorandum Page 4 of 6 May 19, 2022 feet. The minimum height of the ground floor within the Designated Street Front is 12 feet3. Definitions for the Designated Street Front and ground floor are provided below. Designated Street Front Pursuant to EDCD 16.43.030 (B) there are special regulations for the ground floor of buildings in the BD2 zone that are located along a Designated Street Front. The locations of the Designated Street Front are shown in blue in Figure 2 below. The Designated Street Front is defined as the 45 feet measured perpendicular to the street front of the building lot line fronting on each of the mapped streets. D"gneted Street Front QaLer sr I 8��1 c - W a BELL $r $r b OAYYO w 4 n kl4Ek sT w � W � 7 { � ADDER 57 � o � •y � f w WALNUT ST YYALNUT . i a 903 NOWELL "AV � 4M ' . I qa H04ELYHO �� � �iY x S K!Y¢gCK w,AY } LAREH ON Figure 2. EDCD Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front for BD Zone 3 Minimum height of ground floor means the vertical distance from top to top of the successive finished floor surfaces for that portion of the ground floor located within the designated street front. If the ground floor is the only floor above street grade, from the top of the floor finish to the top of the ceiling joists or, where there is not a ceiling, to the top of the roof rafters. "Floor finish" is the exposed floor surface, including coverings applied over a finished floor, and includes, but is not limited to, wood, vinyl flooring, wall-to-wall carpet, and concrete. r C O L LL t m m m C .y m 0 N 0 m C O C O V a C d O tL k:Iproject120700120793105 documentsVeportsVinal_22_0519 edmonds bd2 zoning memo.docx Packet Pg. 193 Page 5 of 6 Edmonds Downtown Business Zone BD2 Zoning Memorandum May 19, 2022 Ground Floor Regulations for the ground floor of development in the BD2 zone are in EDCD 16.43.030.(B). The ground floor is defined as the floor of a building which is closest in elevation to the finished grade along the width of the side of the structure that is principally oriented to the designated street front of the building (this is normally the adjacent sidewalk). For the purposes of this section, the ground "floor" is the sum of the floor planes which, in combination, run the full extent of the building and are closest in elevation to one another. Within the BD2, development on the ground floor along the Designated Street Front must consist only of commercial uses. Any permitted use may be located on the ground floor outside of the designated street front. If the first 45 feet of the building as measured perpendicular to the street consist only of commercial uses and permitted secondary uses, then multiple -family residential unit(s) may be located behind the commercial uses. Parking is not considered to be a commercial use for the purposes of satisfying the ground floor commercial use requirement within the designated street front. In all areas of the Designated Street Front, pedestrian access to permitted residential uses is allowed as a permitted secondary use. When a commercial use is located on the ground floor within the Designated Street Front as shown in Figure 2, the elevation of the ground floor and associated entry must be within seven inches of the grade4 level of the adjoining sidewalk. When the designated street front of a building is on a slope which does not allow both the elevation of the entry and ground floor within the designated street front to be entirely within seven inches of the grade level of the sidewalk, the portion of the ground floor of the building located within the designated street front may be designed to meet one of the three following conditions. ■ The entry is located within seven inches of the grade of the adjacent sidewalk, and the commercial portion of the ground floor located within the designated street front is within seven inches of the grade level of the entry. ■ The building may be broken up into multiple frontages, so that each entry/ground floor combination is within seven inches of the grade of the sidewalk. ■ For corner lots, a primary entry shall be established for the purposes of determining where the ground floor entry rules detailed in this section shall apply. The first choice for the primary entry shall be either 5th Avenue or Main Street. In the case of the BD5 zone, the primary entry shall always be on 4th Avenue. Portions of the ground floor outside the designated street front of the building need not comply with these access requirements. Parking Pursuant to EDCD 16.43.030.(D), no parking is required for any permitted commercial uses located within the BD2 zone. Pursuant to EDCD 17.50.010.(C), all new buildings or additions in any BD zone that are not commercial or residential uses shall provide parking at a flat rate of one parking stall for every 500 square feet of gross floor area of building. Any portions of a building in any BD zone used exclusively for residential uses5 must provide one parking stall per dwelling unit. 4 Grade is measured at the entry location for the development. 5 The term residential uses refer to lobbies, stairwells, elevators, storage areas and other similar features. k:Iproject120700120793105 documentsVeportsVinal_22_0519 edmonds bd2 zoning memo.docx Packet Pg. 194 Edmonds Downtown Business Zone BD2 Zoning Memorandum Page 6 of 6 May 19, 2022 Open Space Pursuant to EDCD 16.43.030.(E), new buildings on lots larger than 12,000 square feet or on lots that have an overall building width of more than 120 feet must provide open space available to the public. Open space is not required for additions to existing buildings that do not increase the building footprint by more than 10 percent. A minimum of five (5) percent of the site area must be devoted to open space, the width of the open space cannot be less than 75 percent of the depth of the open space. Open space must be provided adjacent to the street front, must be open to the air, and can be provided as any combination of the following ■ Outdoor dining or seating areas (including outdoor seating or waiting areas for restaurants or food service establishments). ■ Public plaza or sidewalk that is accessible to the public. ■ Landscaping which includes a seating area that is accessible to the public. Design Standards Development in the BD2 zone must be consistent with the design standards outlined in EDCD Chapter 22.43. The design standards provide guidance on the architectural form, ground level details, window transparency, signage, and other street level, pedestrian oriented, details. The design regulations do not provide any regulations that are relevant to this size, scale, or use of the structure, and have not been summarized for the memorandum. k:Iproject120700120793105 documentsVeportsVinal_22_0519 edmonds bd2 zoning memo.docx Packet Pg. 195 8.1.d B. BD2 Designated Street Front Mr. Lien introduced the Designated Street Front recent history, ordinance history, and map revisions. With the adoption of Interim Ordinance 4262, councilmembers voiced an interest in having commercial office to support the retail core. Legislative history has favored pedestrian activity and commercial uses on both sides of the street as part of the original designation. With the new regulations there must be commercial use within the first 45 feet of designated street front; and there are minimum ground floor requirements of 12 feet in BD2 and 15 feet in BD 1 and different design standards. There are also changes to the use table which clarify ambiguities, fills in blanks, and reference ground floor in ECDC 16.43.030.B for locational requirements. Mr. Lien reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Goal E, E-1 for the Downtown/Waterfront Area to provide for a strong central retail core while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the surrounding area and to support a mix of uses in downtown including a variety of housing, commercial, and cultural activities. The BD zoning purposes state that it is to provide a strong retail core at downtown's focal center while providing for a mixture of supporting commercial and residential uses in the surrounding retail core area. Staff had wondered if Designated Street Front restrictions would inhibit market demand for residential development, if there is a market demand for a mixed commercial building, and if there is a market demand for solely commercial buildings. An analysis by staff of commercial shows that the commercial leasing market appears to be stable. The multifamily rental market shows that there is short supply and high demand for rental units. He reviewed drawings of designs of development they might see in the BD2 zone with the Designated Street Front. The overall conclusion of the market analysis is that the risk associated with the long absorption time for retail spaces coupled with the drastic reduction in rental residential units would make mixed -use projects not feasible for the average boutique developer. The interim ordinance passed by Council will expire on December 1. To make it permanent it will have to come through the Planning Board. Some of the councilmembers want to take a broader look at the Designated Street Front. Staff is not recommending a broader look at this time but possibly in the future in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan Update. He noted it is possible to extend the interim ordinance for more than six months if there is a work plan for how they are going to address it. He suggested a joint meeting with the Economic Development Commission on this. Discussion: Board Member Rosen agreed that they should meet with the Economic Development Commission before making any recommendations. He understands staff s recommendation to not take a broader look at this time but expressed concern that the expanded area could be developed all residential before they do this. He thinks it is prudent to consider the impacts of the "dotted blue lines". Mr. Lien agreed that they should look at the dotted blue lines. If they want to take a bigger look at the Designated Street Front in other areas of the city, he thinks that should be part of the Comprehensive Plan update process. Board Member Rosen thanked staff for the clarification and recommended they don't eliminate any options before meeting with the Economic Development Commission. Chair Crank concurred. Planning Board Meeting Minutes June 8, 2022 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 196 8.1.d Board Member Gladstone asked about the ceiling requirement on the ground floor commercial (12 and 15 feet) and how that compares with residential. Mr. Lien replied that the examples showed 8 or 9 feet for residential. Mr. Lien explained the code shows the ground floor requirement for the first floor in the BD zone is 15 feet from the first floor to the top of the 2nd floor level and 12 feet in the BD2 zone. The taller ceilings are desirable for commercial. Board Member Gladstone commented that desirability is subjective; she wondered if there was a more objective reason. Board Member Cloutier commented that no one will rent a commercial space with a low ceiling. There is a feeling of more light and more air with the higher ceilings. When there is commercial space already on the market that is not renting, this would be building non -usable nonrentable space. Board Member Gladstone welcomed the opportunity to do a walking tour around how things are zoned the way they are so she could have a better grasp of the topic. Board Member Cheung asked about councilmembers' reasoning of having commercial use because it would support retail. Mr. Lien explained that in the BD 1 zone commercial is required on the ground floor. He thinks the Council was interested in protecting commercial/office space outside the BD 1 core but also having residential use downtown that supports the commercial use. Board Member Cheung recalled councilmembers' statements quite a while ago about having more office space people would give life to commercial as they were walking around at lunchtime but wondered if those statements were made pre- Covid. He thought that now, when more people are working from home, it might have shifted, and the residential might be what gives the life to commercial in the downtown area. Vice Chair Pence expressed concern about submerging the main floor as a way to still get three floors. Since there is some general recognition that this is not a desirable building form, can they do some tweaking to the allowable building heights and floor -to -ceiling heights to allow developers to get a functional 3-story building that still keeps with the desired aesthetics. Mr. Lien commented that it would only take an additional two feet to make three floors feasible. He noted that this same discussion has occurred over the last 50 years regarding downtown Edmonds but people are resistant to increasing building heights. Board Member Campbell agreed with looking at raising the allowable building height in order to provide economically feasible buildings that can have people inhabiting them. She thought that people who don't live in the downtown core are less likely to use those businesses than people that live there because of parking challenges. Board Member Gladstone stated she is one of those people who has historically resisted increased building heights, but she has always assumed they were talking about adding another 10 feet to get another floor. This is the first time she has heard it is only two feet. She asked if there were ever renderings done to show what it would look like if they did that. Board Member Cloutier suggested looking at meeting minutes from 2008- 2010 where renderings were made to show the difference between setbacks and cake backs. Mr. Lien noted that building form is what they need to look at to preserve the light and openness. He commented on some of the discussion that occurred in the past and offered to pull up the meeting minutes from way back to give some insight into those discussions. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA Mr. Lien reviewed the extended agenda and discussed a potential meeting with the Economic Development Commission in July or August. There was consensus to try to schedule a joint meeting with the EDC at the Planning Board's regular meeting on August 10 and have a summer break on August 24. Planning Board Meeting Minutes June 8, 2022 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 197 8.1.d CITY OF EDMONDS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING July 20, 2022 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Nicole Hughes, Chair Kevin Harris, Vice Chair Darrol Haug Carrie Hulbert Jay Hoag Kevin Smith Keith Hamilton David Kaufer COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Lee Reeves - unexcused LIAISONS PRESENT: Susan Paine, Councilmember, ex-officio Roger Pence, Planning Board, ex-officio LIAISONS ABSENT: Angela Harris, Port Commissioner, ex-officio Ryan Crowther, Edmonds Chamber, ex-officio GUESTS: STAFF PRESENT: Megan Luttrell, Program Coordinator CS/ED Kernen Lien, Planning Manager Economic Development Commission meeting conducted via ZOOM and called to order by Nicole Hughes at 6:00 p.m. Call to Order and Land Acknowledgement 1. Roll Call and Recognition of Approved Absences: Round robin introductions to introduce David Kaufer to the Commission. Lee Reeves is an unexcused absence. 2. Approval of Agenda: Darrol would like to add a parking discussion as 6.5; Kevin H. would like to add an item to discuss the August meeting as 7.5 and the next meeting date needs to be noted that it's incorrect and should be August 171". Kevin H. seconded, Darrol's addition; Darrol seconded, Kevin H.'s addition; motion passed unanimously. 3. Approval of June 15, 2022, Meeting Summary: Jay moved to approve the meeting summary; Carrie seconded; motion passed. 4. Audience Comments: None. 5. Presentation and Discussion: Edmonds Business Districts: Kernen Lien, Planning Manager is here to give an overview of the BD2 designated street in preparation for the August joint meeting with the Planning Board. Kernen shared a PowerPoint presentation with the Commission to explain the topic and share history on how the designated street front has evolved. The City Council adopted Ordinance 4247 establishing a moratorium on building permit applications for multifamily only buildings in the BD2 after there was a design review application for a multifamily building -to address insufficient design standards. The BD Zoning was adopted in 2007 to define distinct districts in the downtown core. He shared the BD Ordinance History. Kernen explained in the detail the evolution of the BD designated street front. A recent concern is whether multifamily only buildings should be allowed in the BD2 Zone, eliminating commercial space. There was a Market Demand Analysis done to determine commercial and residential space demand and Kernen explained the outcome of the analysis. He continued to cover the history of building heights and limitations that they create. He explained the next steps moving forward and opened it up for questions. Darrol asked what the rationale for 12' ceiling height for first floor spaces in BD2 Zones Designated Street Front. Kernen explained he hasn't Meeting Summary Economic Development Commission July 20, 2022 Page 1 Packet Pg. 198 8.1.d researched why but it has been that way since the inception of the BD Zone. Kernen explained that he's looking for the EDC to weigh in commercial space impacts; there could be discussions on ceiling heights for the 1st floor; EDC could explore height limits. Discussion continued to explore ideas where the EDC could add value to the BD Zone discussion. No parking is required for commercial space in BD Zone. 1 parking space is required for residential space in BD Zone. Nicole concluded to review the attachment that was included in this month's packet. The EDC will join the Planning Board meeting on August loth at 7pm to participate in the joint discussion on this topic. 6. Presentation and Discussion: Consideration for Moving City Facilities: Nicole explained that the last time this was discussed, everyone was directed to review Councilmember Chen's email requesting the Commission research the idea of the moving City services out of downtown. She shared a history of the EDC's past work on this topic. Nicole opened the discussion up to determine how the group feels about moving forward on this idea. Kevin H. suggested opening the discussion up to City staff to see what the observations are, including Police Chief Bennett Darrol added that he will be gathering notes of what was discussed within the committee. He's also discussed this with several councilmembers and will also gather those notes. Nicole suggested taking Darrol's notes and meeting with Councilmember Chen. She also recommended that the commissioners discuss with the stakeholders, the impact of moving. Darrol pointed out that there has been significant turnover in staff and Council since the last time this was recommended by the EDC. The last recommendation that was presented to Council was in 2018 and it was specifically to move City Hall, not Public Safety departments. 6.5 Parking Discussion: Darrol noted that a parking enforcement position has been requested to serve all of Edmonds. 7. City Update: Last night at Council, Todd Tatum was confirmed as the new Community Services/Economic Development Director. 7.5 August Meetings: The EDC will participate in a joint meeting with Planning Board on August loth Nicole suggested maintaining the regularly scheduled, August 17tn meeting also to have Susan McLaughlin attend to discuss the Neighborhood Branding. Kevin H. noted discussions with Development Services Director/Susan McLaughlin to better align neighborhood efforts, to avoid duplication, and to better understand and share goals and objectives. Susan indicated interest in joining an EDC meeting to further discuss. Darrol suggested that the EDC meet at 6pm on August loth to prepare for the joint meeting and then jump into the 7pm PB meeting. Carrie asked to meet with Susan M. at the September EDC meeting so she can attend. Jay also suggested forgoing the August 171h meeting and to meet in September; Susan P. agreed. Kevin H. will reach out to Susan M. to see if we can push the meeting with her into September. If so, the group will conduct the full EDC meeting on August loth, instead of the regularly scheduled date.. 8. Liaison Updates a. City Council (Susan Paine) Council confirmed the CS/ED Director's appointment. Susan McLaughlin is doing some very dynamic work with the neighborhoods. The Hwy 99 revitalization project is ramping up. The City has received a significant amount of donations over the past years to maintain the beautification efforts. It was shock to learn Monday that Councilmember Kristiana Johnson passed on Monday. She made a huge impact on our City. b. Port of Edmonds (Angela Harris) absent. c. Chamber of Commerce (Ryan Crowther) absent. d. Planning Board (Roger Pence) Roger seconded Susan's sentiments. Meeting Summary Economic Development Commission July 20, 2022 Page 2 Packet Pg. 199 8.1.e CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Webinar Meeting August 10, 2022 Chair Crank called the virtual meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES Board Member Campbell read the Land Acknowledgement. Board Members Present Staff Present Alicia Crank, Chair Roger Pence, Vice Chair Matt Cheung Judi Gladstone Richard Kuehn Mike Rosen Beth Tragus-Campbell (alternate) Lily Distelhorst (student rep) Board Members Absent Todd Cloutier (excused) Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Kernen Lien, Planning Division Manager READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 27, 2022 AS PRESENTED. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED. AUDIENCE COMMENTS GregBrewer rewer expressed concern about the erosion of the business base in the BD2 zone as a result of changes to the permitted use tables which would allow 100% residential buildings. He urged the Planning Board to protect all of the BD2 zone. Michelle Dutch commented that the BD2 designation is defined as downtown mixed commercial. She reviewed how the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Element discuss downtown mixed commercial. She urged the Planning Board to preserve commercial in the BD2 zone. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 10, 2022 Pagel of 6 Packet Pg. 200 8.1.e JOINT MEETING WITH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION A. BD Designated Street Front Economic Development Commission Members Present: Darrol Haug, Keith Hamilton, Jay Hoag, Vice Chair Kevin Harris, Kevin Smith, Chair Nicole Hughes, David Kaufer, David Coffer, Councilmember Susan Paine Introductions were made. Senior Planner Clugston introduced the topic and made a brief presentation regarding the BD Designated Street Front. He reviewed: • Language from the Downtown Mixed Commercial and Downtown Mixed Residential sections of the Comprehensive Plan. • Designated Street Front regulations: must be commercial within first 45 feet of designated street front; 12-foot minimum ground floor (15 feet in BD 1); different design standards History of BD2 projects that have occurred since 2011: Post Office, 303 Edmonds Street, 117 2nd Avenue S, 611 Main Street, 627 Dayton Street, 310 Daley. With the exception of the post office, all the other projects were residential proposals. Potential Recommendations: 1. No change — keep Designated Street Front as in Ordinance 3865 2. Accept interim map and use table in Ordinance 4262 3. Accept interim map and take broader look at all BD zones after Comprehensive Plan update (staff s recommendation) 4. Require all BD2 parcels to be mixed use (to have Designated Street Front requirements) 5. Require all BD2 parcels to be mixed use and consider zoning change after Comprehensive Plan update to facilitate two floors of residential above commercial Mr. Clugston invited discussion regarding the topic and noted that a public hearing is tentatively scheduled for September 28. EDC Chair Hughes explained that there is not necessarily a consensus among the EDC regarding this topic. EDC Commissioner Harris asked what led the staff to the recommendation they favor if the Comprehensive Plan is the overall guiding document. Mr. Clugston replied that the timing of the project in relation to the Comprehensive Plan update is not ideal. Staff feels that making the interim ordinance into a permanent ordinance results in the changes that the Council wanted to see, but it doesn't take a larger step of redrawing an entire area in the downtown area. Planning Manager Kernen Lien explained that part of the Comprehensive Plan update process will be a visioning process where they can take a broader look at the downtown core and where those designated street fronts should be or not. EDC Commissioner Haug referred to first floor height requirements for BD 1 and BD2 zones. He noted that a previous EDC looked at this extensively and made a recommendation to change BD 1 to allow 12-foot construction, the same as what BD2 is right now. The EDC was confused about why there was a difference in first floor height requirements between the two zones. Planning Manager Lien stated that the BD 1 height requirement had to do with the retail/display use of the ground floor. The BD2 zone had more to do with office uses where 12 feet is the standard. He noted that the ground floor height impacts the ability to potentially get three floors. The economic analysis in the packet shows that it is harder to Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 10, 2022 Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 201 8.1.e get three floors with the ground floor height requirement. Recommendation 5 would be to consider some flexibility with the heights to allow potentially three floors if commercial is required on the ground floor. PB Chair Crank asked for clarification about the pieces that are likely to get changed anyway in the update and visioning process so they don't spend too much time working on those things right now. Planning Manager Lien replied they will be looking at the whole downtown area. This item has been flagged as something that specifically needs to be looked at. He thinks they will likely be looking at commercial use in the downtown area and housing use/availability. EDC Commissioner Smith referred to the old post office and asked how the ground floor building heights compare to what would otherwise be available in the BD2 zone. He asked if the preferred recommendation #3 would allow the building without commercial or if it would require street fronts. Mr. Clugston replied that the post office had 12-foot first floor heights. The preferred recommendation would leave the map as it is with the interim ordinance and the few extensions that the Council approved in June as well as the updated use table. In the future they would look at the broader view of the downtown area after the Comprehensive Plan is updated. EDC Commissioner Hoag noted that the 6ffi & Main project is removing an existing commercial building to put in residential. He acknowledged that there is a housing crisis, but there was a good reason that BD2 had intentional mixed use with business on the ground floor. He thinks they will regret losing the commercial space in the BD2 zone. PB Member Gladstone asked what the drivers are to push for this now rather than waiting for the update and visioning process. Mr. Lien reviewed recent history which brought this to attention and caused Council to adopt a moratorium and interim ordinances for designated street front and design standards. The ordinances are only good for six months. If they are not addressed now, the interim ordinance will just revert back to what it was before it was adopted. MOTION MADE BY CHAIR CRANK TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF OPTION 3. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. EDC Vice Chair Harris commented he doesn't have a good understanding of the risks of letting things go back to status quo or changing it to the City's preferred option. Mr. Lien explained the designated street front would get contracted back down to what it was before the interim ordinance. It was extended to protect the retail core by having commercial around the BD 1 zone and to identify areas where there were commercial uses on both sides of the street and within the primary pedestrian areas downtown. Another important part of this was the update to the use table to clarify the uses in the BD2 zone. Recommendation 3 matches what staff is hearing from Council and what they have been hearing from the public. Chair Hughes commented she was leaning towards being able to support Recommendation 3. PB Member Rosen spoke in support of protecting the area for additional business growth. He pointed out that they are not talking about either/or but how much residential. In addition, he referred to previous discussions about transition zones. He noted that people are responding to their experiences walking down the street and their interaction with the buildings. He also spoke in support of Recommendation 3 to "protect the dirt" while also saying they are not done talking about this. PB Member Gladstone asked if the interim designated street front lines reflect what is on the ground better than the actual map. Mr. Lien explained how the expanded lines in the interim ordinance were drawn. They reflect what is actually on the ground right now. PB Member Gladstone asked the Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 10, 2022 Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 202 8.1.e difference between making the interim designation permanent and the Recommendation 5 regarding allowing mixed use. Mr. Lien explained Recommendation 5 would also address potential height issues. • EDC Commissioner Smith commented that the Comprehensive Plan update is the appropriate time to take a deeper look at this. He cautioned against getting rid of potential commercial space as they are seeing vibrant growth in the city. He voiced support for Recommendation 4. • PB Member Kuehn expressed concern that if they only do Recommendation 3 it allows issues to happen in other areas. He agrees with "protecting the dirt" until they can take a broader look at this. He spoke in support of Recommendation 4. • PB Member Campbell spoke in support of trying to raise the building height limits in order to get to three stories. She thinks it is going to be necessary in the long run to have this commercial space. She spoke in support of Recommendations 4 or 5 to keep commercial space from disappearing. • EDC Commissioner Hoag commented that this will all lead to some reevaluation of the Comprehensive Plan. It doesn't seem feasible that the current owners of the building could adjust their current building to match the interim standards and get it approved before they get to the Comprehensive Plan update. He wasn't sure if anything would ever occur if they did Recommendation 3. MOTION MADE BY PB MEMBER ROSEN TO SUPPORT OF RECOMMENDATION 4 TO "PROTECT THE DIRT" AND TAKE A BROADER LOOK AT THIS WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESS. MOTION SECONDED BY PB MEMBER GLADSTONE. • Student Representative Distelhorst spoke to the need for more housing and spoke in support of preserving options for multifamily housing. • EDC Commissioner Haug asked if EDC members should participate in voting tonight. Mr. Lien noted that the formal recommendation by the Planning Board would be taken following the September 28 public hearing. He stated that they would like to hear the recommendation from the EDC. • EDC Commissioner Hamilton agreed that the City does need some housing in the downtown area, especially charming housing. He thinks that this will help the existing businesses. He also recommended making sure to change height requirements so that they can get three floors. He recommended Recommendation 3 which gives the most flexibility and uses the Comprehensive Plan process. • PB Member Kuehn clarified that the motion would extend the BD2 zones and take a broader look at all BD zones after the Comprehensive Plan process. It will not take away the ability to build residential units. THE MOTION TO APPROVE AMENDED OPTION 4 PASSED. Mr. Lien stated that staff would bring back Recommendation 4 to the public hearing on September 28. Chair Crank thanked the EDC for joining them tonight. EDC Chair Hughes thanked the group for the collaboration. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Public Hearing on Permanent Design Standards for Multifamily Buildings in the BD2 Zone (AMD2022- 0001) Senior Planner Mike Clugston introduced the public hearing for the permanent standards for multifamily only buildings in the BD2 zone as recommended by the Architectural Design Board (ADB) last week. He reviewed Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 10, 2022 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 203 ;lap 16.43-1, Designated Swrm From for BD Zones 8.11 � pF EDP O Designated Streel k0nl .0u. t. 8D Gp; ffo W � } u'F C. ALDER $T W n VMALFIUT ST } 44 4Rj�Y _ I Ord. 3865 _ - Dec. 2011 WS Y -4- SY ERBr,4 6R DALEY ST � SELL Sf m L MAPLE Sf—I ALDER 5T ..� WA4NUT S �1/.f.11fl�LCk l!L N4MELAH6 HLULOQK WAY Packet Pg. 204 1 8.1.f c O r �a r c a� N O L IL N N O C 3 O U r I C O L. LL f+ d d L N Cu r_ N 0 Co Packet Pg. 205 16.43.020 Uses. A. Tab lc 16.43-1. Permitted Uws 1tQl f,BQI ILOD 1311; itl}1 I11)., C'VmmerC141 Uaea RdaiI sbwsorsales A A A A A O OFlioes % A A A A R 41 LepUlaw films A x — A A C a) In Financial A x IL AdviSing A — = — — N Mortgage A— O liunil¢(withourtellem) A x � g _ T— •V A - —ling A x — l — C Counarling A x _ 3 O U Arcbitecturr % 1 _ _ 411 C Engineering x — — — 0 LL Adverlisitlg A x d fiances rclar ed husinase {yaga+pilatesrgym�f[ness club) A — — — Stnice urea A d t3 Retail sales mquirinll iniensiw: OILUk" displayorsWrage areas, such as li iri LI C sales, used car lob (mceptaspart of s new tar sales and smire dtslorl, and l,;i .. 'N equilmWat Slumps, saleS Or Sen'I69s d Emk+sed Fahricaiirn heasst mbly areas &NO601W wish Wed oh the Samc prnpc iy N as an an studio. an gal Icry, restaurant. Inicrobrmcricsldisulleries ar faad scni" ca ealabliskmenl thus a Iso provides m on -site relail outlet open to Iho public m Awm-POV Olen aryl service' x A x Dry cleaning sad laandry planes which use only nonflammable and noncxplosit c x A A x cleaning uQ:ots Printing, publiSlnng and bimdi ng eslWblitArmentg a [ K LU Public markets licensed pursuant to provisiam in Chapter 4.90 ECCI C Neese entla1 E $ii%1-ramilydwKlling ?k A A A L U Multiple dwdling units) A l A A r } i1i21LQ ()Ihrr U08 1#uaslopaheltm A A A ti ChUtthrN, ftLNKr to tltc requiremmis art CW 17.100.020 LA�% Packet Pg. 206 8.1.f c O r �a r c a� N O L IL N N O C 3 O U r I C O L. LL f+ d d L N Cu r_ N 0 Co Packet Pg. 207 Designated Street Front I WALK Ord.42 Interim June 2022-- W 10 IW i4 w4y r Designated Street Front 1/ Ha Exhi S� f B& - I aAYTo ALDER 'JL WAS UT a T- Ba3 WAY, Proposed F Permanent 7 a BD2 DSF -- }W RE - 4¢ �aLF , 5T 5 T o VF� L_� c m L N BELL r O I � i �f O i��_ C = O L - LL - MAPLE ST N C La ALDER ST WAU = I K _L R L EUj N HOMELAND-`'� _ - Q —_ HEMLOCK Packet Pg. 208 �rY _ T1 8.1.f c O r �a r c a� N O L IL N N O C 3 O U r I C O L. LL f+ d d L N Cu r_ N 0 Co Packet Pg. 209 Shoreline* I 58CICiltBfy..-.. rr` e6mands - Kingslon Ferri. � 4 44 IF 4 �� { • x „•� ULEdmonds i Mi■* MafSll r Mot", drt•d±t y sea Park '� , xyrri; = too -• f + + j It k lards&pint i • 5 w in' f �{ - k P . 117 PIP L 1. , 8.1.f COMMERCIAL IAL SPACE DEMAND DATA RETAIL MARKET Current available Average Days on Market (DOM) all SF types of spaces spaces Historical Days on Market — NIA 255 DOM (Historical) Last 3.5 years General Retail 5 276 DM Current Vacant Net listed: 1 NIA 't La Vie Business appears closed 1 NIA Not l istedL . f Bop J • Burger OFFICE MARKET Current available Average Days on Market (DOM) all SF types of spaces spaces Historical Days on Market — NIA 230 DOM (Historical) Last 3.5 years 1000 to 2000 sf spaces are 7 307 DOM (Current) what currently is available c 0 0 N N L IL N N Ict r U r- 0 U I 0 L LL d L N T N N m t0 x W E a a Packet Pg. 211 8.1.f c O r �a r c a� N O L IL N N O C 3 O U r I C O L. LL f+ d d L N Cu r_ N 0 Co Packet Pg. 212 ALLEY ACCESS 2 OR 2 BR 021 SF 927 SF STAIRS m I STAIRS 1BR 1BR PARKING F I 670 SF 025 5F 22Uj O U A d Uj d I 7 OR 1 BR 7{ fi25 $F 926 8F A STAIRS STAIRS EL I 17 EL. 3 BR 1,440 3f LOBBY J DESIGNATED STREET FRONT GARAGE RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1 BR:12 2BR: 7 3BR: 3 TOTAL: 22 2 BR 20R 921 SF 927 SF STAIRS 1 BR 670 SF 2 BR 970 SF 1 BR 625 SF } STAIRS EL. 38R 1 BR 1,325 SF 700 SF �I:��1�I�I�Iw�►1� ��I�I���I�7,a GARAGE PARKING1: (1 STALL PER UNIT REQUIRED) TOTAL: 22 BUILDING HEIGHT: GARAGE: BELOW GRADE FIRST FLOOR: 9' SECOND FLOOR: 9' Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning / Residential Option 3-Story Over Below Grade Garage 2 BR 26R 921 SF 927 $F STAIRS 1SR IBR 605 SIF B06 SF 1BR 1BR 600SF 6065F STAIRS �. EL 3 6R 1 BR 1,200 SF 570 SF 3RD FLOOR OPTION 1 C O R C N i a N N O C 3 O U C O LLL t L a� fa c T m 0 N m t x Lu c aD E t Q Packet Pg. 213 8.1.f GARAGE I" ,rvpo6o RoSIsplpor* dia ZZ 0 wat"s Packet Pg. 214 ALLEY ACCESS I STAIR$ N 0 0 GARAGE `D PARKING R A 18 D J W � J a I A I I STAIRS 7SF39R LOBBY DESIGNATED STREET FRONT GROUND LEVEL RESIDENTIAL OPTION: 1 BR: B 2BR:6 3BR: 3 I(a]ElM& 2BR 927 SF 3BR 1,420 SF STAIRS 2 BR 770 SF 2BR 670 SF 2 BR 770 SF STAIRS 1 SR 2 BR 657 SF TM 8F 3BR 1.420 SF 2 HR 870 SF &101:�,,: 1 BR 657 SF 28R 927 5F STAIRS 2 OR 77D SF 2 OR 77D SF 2 OR 770 SF 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR GARAGE PARKING1; (1 STALL PER UNIT REQUIRED) TOTAL: 16 BUILDING HEIGHT: FIRST FLOOR: 10' SECOND FLOOR: 9' THIRD FLOOR: 9' PARAPET: 2' TOTAL HEIGHT: 30' Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning I Residential option 3-Story OPTION 2 Packet Pg. 215 060 o*&%711, I Packet Pg. 216 1 GARAGE PARKING A 12 r w LU to S BBV ALLEY ACCESS I STAIRS vU.r a d J W ii BIKE ¢�¢ W 1 I I J DESIGNATED STREET FRONT 2 BR 2 BR g25 SF 925 SF STAIRS 1 W 8R aw SF 9w SF LSRF 556 9F STAIRS 3 RR 3 BR 1,411 SF 1,140 SF i GROUND LEVEL 2ND FLOOR COMMERCIAL: 1,900 SF GARAGE PARKING1: (1 STALL PER UNIT REQUIRED) TOTAL:12 RESIDENTIAL UNITS: BUILDING HEIGHT: NOTE: 1BR 4 FIRST FLOOR:12' Financial feasibility of two-story with commercial may be 213R: 2 SECOND FLOOR: 8' questionable. Third floor may not be feasible due to 39 height 3W 2 PARAPET: 2' limitation and specific site constraints. TOTAL: 8 TOTAL HEIGHT: 22' Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning I Commercial Option 2-Story OPTION 3 Packet Pg. 217 8.1.f Packet Pg. 218 Figure 1. Three story development with a below grade commercial entrance. dPOrTAd- P, r I Packet Pg. 219 1 8.1.f Figure 2. Three story development with a below grade commercial entrance. r�' Packet Pg. 220 ALLEY ACCESS J I STAIRS $[LLi7 GARAGE I PARKING F I 1d O Uj W I a A STAIRS NA LOBBY MERCIAL f,900 SF - - J DESIGNATED STREET FRONT 2OR 2BR 1,000SF 925SF STAIRS 1 SR 755 2 BR 1,000 SF 1 OR STAIRS 755 3BR 1,140SF 1 BR 755 2 BR 2 BR 1,000aF 9MSF STAIRS 1 BR 755 2 BR 1,000 SF I OR STAIRS 75* 1,B 0 SF 1 BR 755 GROUND LEVEL 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR COMMERCIAL OPTION: GARAGE PARKING1: (1 STALL PER UNIT REQUIRED) 1,900 SF TOTAL: 14 RESIDENTIAL UNITS: BUILDING HEIGHT: NOTE: 1 BR: 6 GROUND LEVEL:12' Third floor may not be feasible due to 30' height limitation and 2BR: 6 FIRST FLOOR: 8' specific site constraints. An additional 2' in height allows for a 36R: 2 SECOND FLOOR: 8' more traditional building design that would front the street with PARAPET: 2' commercial at grade with fronting public sidewalk. TOTAL: 14 TOTAL HEIGHT: 32' Edmonds downtown Business BD2 Zoning I Commercial option 3-Story OPTION 4 Packet Pg. 221 8.1.f o900000t ANT P, vN� Packet Pg. 222 8.1.f c O r �a r c a� N O L IL N N O C 3 O U r I C O L. LL f+ d d L N R N 0 m Packet Pg. 223 8.1.f c O r �a r c a� N O L IL N N O C 3 O U r I C O L. LL f+ d d L N Cu r_ N 0 Co Packet Pg. 224 8.1.f c O r �a r c a� N O L IL N N O C 3 O U r I C O L. LL f+ d d L N R N 0 m Packet Pg. 225 or EDA, o� -f c CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Amendments to Chapter 16.43 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) revising the Designated Street Front map in ECDC 16.43-1 to include additional parcels in the BD2 zone and related clarifications. Proponent: City of Edmonds Location of proposal, including street address if any: This is a non -project action. Lead agency: City of Edmonds The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The City of Edmonds has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW 43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no significant adverse impacts will be created. There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. X This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by October 13, 2022. Project Planner: Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Responsible Official: Kernen Lien, Planning Manager Contact Information: City of Edmonds 1 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 1 425-771-0220 Date: September 29, 2022 Signature: XX You may appeal this determination to Kernen Lien, Planning Manager, at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than October 20, 2022. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Kernen Lien to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. XX Posted on September 29, 2022, at City Hall and the Edmonds Public Safety Building. Not posted at Edmonds Public Library since it's currently closed. Published in the Everett Herald. Emailed to the Department of Ecology SEPA Center (SEPAunit@ecy.wa.gov). XX Distribute to "Checked" Agencies below. The SEPA Checklist, DNS, and associated documents can be obtained online at https://www.edmondswa.gov/services/public involvement/public notices/development notices under permit number AMD2022-0003, by emailing the project planner(michael.clugston@edmondswa.gov), or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Page 1 of 2 AMD2022-0003 SEPA DETERMINATION DESIGNATED STREET FRONT BD2 ZONE CODE AMENDMENT 9i27/22.SEPn Packet Pg. 226 8.1.g Distribution List: This DNS and SEPA checklist were distributed to the following: ❑ Applicant ❑ Parties of Record ❑ US Army Corps of Engineers ❑ US Fish and Wildlife ❑X Puget Sound Energy ❑X Snohomish PUD ❑ Olympic View Water & Sewer ❑ Alderwood Water District ❑X Edmonds School District ❑ Port of Edmonds ❑X South County Fire ❑ Swedish Hospital ❑X Community Transit pc: File No. SEPA Notebook ❑X Dept. of Ecology ❑ Dept. of Ecology - Shorelands ❑ Dept. of Natural Resources ❑N Dept. of Commerce ❑ WSDOT ❑ WSDOT— Ferries ❑ Dept. of Fish & Wildlife ❑ Dept. of Health — Drinking Water ❑N Dept. of Arch. & Historic Pres. ❑ Dept. of Parks and Rec. Commission ❑ Puget Sound Clean Air Agency ❑ Puget Sound Regional Council ❑ Puget Sound Partnership ❑X Tulalip Tribe ❑ City of Everett ❑ City of Lynnwood ❑ City of Mountlake Terrace ❑ City of Mukilteo ❑ City of Shoreline ❑ Town of Woodway ❑ Snohomish Co. Public Works ❑ Snohomish Co. PDS ❑ Snohomish Co. Health Dist. ❑ King County -Transit ❑ King County— Environ. Planning ❑ Other Page 2 of 2 AMD2022-0003 SEPA DETERMINATION DESIGNATED STREET FRONT BD2 ZONE CODE AMENDMENT 9i27/22.SEPn Packet Pg. 227 8.1.g File No.: AMD2022-0003 Applicant: City of Edmonds DECLARATION OF POSTING On the 29th day of September, 2022, the attached SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance was posted as prescribed by Ordinance. However, it was not posted at the Edmonds Public Library because it is currently closed due to a water leak that occurred on June 24. I, Mike Clugston, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 29th day of September, 2022, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed: Packet Pg. 228 Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly swom, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH963868 DESIG. STREET MAP as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 09/29/2022 and ending on 09/29/2022 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount of a fee for suc publics $44.72. Subscribed and sworn ore me on this day o No ary Public in and for the State of Washington. City dEd—d. UWoI pment Serw..l 8603/703 MICHELLE MARTIN Linda Phillips Notary Public State of Washington My Appointment Expires 8/29/2025 Commission Number 407 I Packet Pg. 229 8.1.g Classified Proof CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF SEPA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Edmonds has issued a Determination of Nons7gnlYicance for the following project. PROJECT DESCRIPTION; Amendments to Chapter 16.43 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) revising the Desic haled Street Front map in ECDC 16.43-1 to Include additional parcels in the 802 zone and related clarlficallons PROJECT PROPONENT' City of Edmonds DATE DNS ISSUED: September 29, 2022 PROJECT LOCATION: This is a non -project action. SEPA COMMENTS DUE; October 13, 2022 APPEAL PERIOD: You may appeal this determination by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for appeal with the required appeal fee no later than October 20, 2022 by 4:00 PM- SEPA MATERIALS: The SEPA Checklist, DNS, and related project Information are available for review at. httpsJ/wv�w.edmondswa, gov/servicestpubsci nvolve me nt/pubfic no t1 ces/develo pmentnotices under permit number AMD2022-0003, by em al'Iing the City contact fisted below, or by calling the Ctty of Edmonds at 425- 7 71-0220. CITY CONTACT; Mike Clugston, AICP, Senior Planner rilchaoI,clugston@edmondswa gov 425-771.0'220 Published; September 29, 2022- EDF-1963868 Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 09/29/2022 09:50:15 am Page: 2 Packet Pg. 230 8.1.g From: COM GMU Review Team <reviewteam@commerce.wa.gov> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 8:32 AM To: Clugston, Michael Subject: City of Edmonds - Expedited Review Request Granted for Submittal ID: 2022-S-4368 Dear Mr. Clugston, Your request for an Expedited Review has been granted for: Proposed amendment to revise the extent of the Designated Street Front for the BD2 zone as shown on the map in ECDC 16.43-1 and related clarifications. As of receipt of this email, you have met the Growth Management notice to state agency requirements in RCW 36.70A.106 for this submittal. Please keep this email as confirmation. If you have any questions, please contact Kirsten Larsen at (360) 280-0320 or by email at kirsten.larsen@commerce.wa.gov. --- ONLINE TRACKING SYSTEM AVAILABLE ---- Log into our new PlanView system at https://secureaccess.wa.gov/com/planview where you can keep up with this submittal status, reprint communications and update your contact information. Don't have a user account? Reply to this email to request one and attach a completed PlanView User Request Form. Have questions about using PlanView? Use the PlanView User Manual for assistance at https://www.commerce.wa.gov/serving-communities/growth- manage ment/washington-department-of-commerce-growth-management-submitting= materials/. Sincerely, Review Team Growth Management Services Packet Pg. 231 IIIIIII I 8.1.h Designated Street Front ""NpDALEY d W Q -3= �BD3 L WAY LE ST ALDE DALEY ST IZI]--= wE — 11 C 0— IL NJ — T t W�3 BELL V D2 c n U la d — yCD c CO� CO a� E CD E= N 1 WALNUT ST L s K W r� C d E t Q I Packet Pg. 232 IIJ Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 1/3 8.1.h 16.43.020 Uses. A. Table 16.43-1. Permitted Uses BD1 GBDI BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Commercial Uses Retail stores or sales A A A A A A Offices A X A A A A Legal/law fines A X A A A A Financial A X \ A A A Advising A X A A A A Mortgage A X A A A A Banks (without tellers) A X A A A A Accounting A X A A A A Counseling A X A A A A Architecture A X A A A A Engineering A X A A A A Advertising A X \ \ A \ Insurance A X \ \ A A Fitness related business (yoga/pilates/gym/fitness club) A X A \ A A Service uses A A(2) A A A A Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or services X X X X X X Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant, microbreweries/distilleries or food service establishment that also provides an on -site retail outlet open to the public A A A A A A Automobile sales and service X X A A X X Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents C X A A A X Printing, publishing and binding establishments C X A A A C Public markets licensed pursuant to provisions in Chapter 4.90 ECC' A A A A A A Residential Single-family dwelling A X A A A A Multiple dwelling unit(s) — must he losated Rn second FlRo_ or behind first 45 feet fron...:aeival . or rights 4�see ECDC 16.43.030.13 for further location standards A X A A A A Other Uses Bus stop shelters A A A A A A Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020 A A A A A A The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 233 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 2/3 8.1.h Permitted Uses BD1 GFSF(') BD2 BD3 BD4 BD5 Primary and high schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R) A X A A A A Local public facilities, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050 C C C C A C Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 A A A A A A Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use B X B B B B Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this zone B X B B B X Commercial parking lots C X C C C X Wholesale uses X X X C X X Hotels and motels A A A A A A Amusement establishments C C C C C C Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions C X C C C C Drive-in/through businesses (businesses with drive through facilities) X X C A C X Laboratories X X C C C X Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a permitted use X X X C X X Day-care centers C X C C A C Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums X X C C A X Medical uses, e.g., A X A A A A Physicians A X A A A A Dental A X a A A A Optometrist (without retail) A X A A A A Physical therapy (without retail) A X A A A A Counseling A X \ 1 1 1 Other similar medical services A X \ 1 1 \ Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 A A A A A A Zoos and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033 C X C C C A Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers X X C C A X Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070 C C C C C C Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use D X D D D D Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC X X D D D D A = Permitted primary use B = Permitted secondary use The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 234 Exhibit B Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code Page 3/3 8.1.h C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit X = Not permitted NOTES: (1) BD Zone GFSF = Ground Floor Designated Street Frontage (first 45 feet measured from public rights-of-way/sidewalk or parks/plazas) as defined under Edmonds Community Development Code Map 16.43-1: Designated Street Front for BD Zones. Buildings set back 15 feet or more from the sidewalk shall not be subject to the BD Zone GFSF requirements. (2) Services — by appointment uses not providing open door retail/dining/entertainment functions as a primary component of the business are not allowed within BD 1 GFSF (first 45 feet). Open door businesses, e.g., real estate offices, banks (with tellers and no drive-throughs), nail and hair salons are allowed. For conditional uses listed in Table 16.43-1, the use may be permitted if the proposal meets the criteria for conditional uses found in Chapter 20.05 ECDC, and all of the following criteria are met: 1. Access and Parking. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the sidewalk. Vehicular access shall only be provided consistent with ECDC 18.80.060. When a curb cut is necessary, it shall be landscaped to be compatible with the pedestrian streetscape and shall be located and designed to be as unobtrusive as possible. 2. Design and Landscaping. The project shall be designed so that it is oriented to the street and contributes to the pedestrian streetscape environment. Fences more than four feet in height along street lot lines shall only be permitted if they are at least 50 percent open, such as a lattice pattern. Blank walls shall be discouraged, and when unavoidable due to the nature of the use shall be decorated by a combination of at least two of the following: a. Architectural features or details; b. Artwork; c. Landscaping. B. Exception to the BD1 GSFS. The owner of a building in the BD zone may apply for an exception from the restrictions on offices and medical uses within the designated street front for leasable space meeting all of the following criteria: 1. The space is less than 500 square feet; 2. The space does not contain direct access to the street or sidewalk; 3. The previous use was a nonconforming use (e.g., not retail); and 4. The space has been vacant for a period of more than six months. [Ord. 3955 § 1 (Att. A), 2014; Ord. 3932 § 6, 2013; Ord. 3918 § 1 (Att. 1), 2013; Ord. 3894 § 4, 2012; Ord. 3700 § 1, 2008]. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. Packet Pg. 235 8.1.i Chair Pence responded that any change to the zoning code would need to come through the Planning Board. It would also have to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which is just at the beginning phase of a major rewrite. There are a lot of steps that would have to happen before they get to anything like the changes Mr. Williamson was talking about. PUBLIC HEARING A. Public Hearing on BD Designated Street Front Senior Planner Mike Clugston made a presentation regarding the BD2 designated street front (DSF). He stated the meeting objectives would be to discuss the proposed permanent BD2 DSF map and updated use table, discuss market demand analysis and recommendations from the consultant, take public comment, and make a recommendation to Council. He compared maps showing the Council's interim extended DSF map and the proposed permanent B132 DSF map which would extend "the blue line" to all B132 parcels to be consistent with the Downtown Mixed Commercial designation in the Comprehensive Plan. This was the consensus that came out of the Planning Board/EDC meeting in August. He recapped requirements for DSF which include commercial use within the first 45 feet of the "blue line", 12-foot minimum ground floor height (15 feet in BD1), and specific design standards. He reviewed the consultant Otak's market demand analysis takeaways. They concluded that one floor of residential over ground floor commercial is not economically feasible for most boutique developers. Two floors residential over ground floor commercial is economically feasible but exceeds the 30' height limit. The consultant recommended a zoning change of a minor increase in building height (2'-5') to allow "two over one" development. This would make a three-story development feasible in those locations. The Planning Board and EDC had previously recommended extending the ground floor requirements but also taking a look at zoning changes that would be needed to implement the extended "blue line". Along with the changes to the map was the changes to the BD Uses table to clarify ambiguities, fill in blanks in uses created by Ordinance 3955, and reference ground floor in ECDC 16.43.030.B for locational requirements. Mr. Clugston concluded that if they are fully extending DSF to all BD2 parcels, staff recommends future work on a code amendment to increase height limits to allow three stories to feasibly work in the BD2 zone. Public Comments: Mr. Williamson referred to the recommendation to increase heights 2'-5'. He noted there is a big difference between two feet and five feet and asked what was really necessary to meet the goal of three stories. Mr. Clugston replied that the recommendation from the consultant was a range. He thought that this might depend on the typography of the site but noted they could check with the consultant to see if there is a more specific number. Discussion: Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 28, 2022 Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 236 8.1.i MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER ROSEN TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL THAT THEY MAKE PERMANENT THE FULLY EXTENDED DSF TO ALL BD2 PARCELS, APPROVE THE UPDATED USE TABLE, AND THAT THEY CONSIDER CODE AMENDMENTS DURING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE TO INCREASE HEIGHT LIMITS. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER CHEUNG. Board Member Rosen emphasized that he intentionally was not bundling the motion for the extended DSF to all BD2 parcels with the increased height limits but that he was just recommending that Council consider it. Board Member Cheung agreed with Board Member Rosen's recommendation to not bundle the two issues because the increased height limits will likely be a hot topic. Chair Pence added that when they get to the point of detailed rewriting of the zoning code, they will probably want to look at other sites within the Downtown Business zones. This will be after the Comprehensive Plan update process is complete. Board Member Kuehn spoke in support of the motion. He agreed that more work needs to be done before he is ready to recommend a height increase. THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update Planning Manager Lien gave an update on the Comprehensive Plan Update. Comprehensive Plan Branding: PRR was the consultant selected to help with the branding and came up with the "Everyone's Edmonds" branding. They also developed some templates and mini surveys. They provided some translation services and looked through past outreach materials. Six -week Themed Visioning Outreach: The work with PRR led into a community -guided visioning process which was a six -week temed outreach on key topics. These key topics included Identity, Quality of Life, Economic Growth, Environment, Culture, and Livability and Land Use. The approach involved tabling at local events, coffee chats in various neighborhood centers, some walk and talks, a panel discussion, and a community survey. One of the most successful parts of the outreach was the yard signs. These greatly increased the number of comments on the survey. The overall outreach goal was to solicit 3,500 comments from the community and over 8,500 comments were received. Over 600 comments were received from events and nearly 7,900 were received from the community survey. Visioning Next Steps: The next step will be to organize the comments by theme and evaluate the results. A draft vision statement and community values will be developed based on the outreach results. There will be a presentation to the Planning Board and Council followed by a public reveal of the draft on November 5. Feedback will be collected on the draft visioning and it will again be presented to the Planning Board and to the Council for final adoption. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 28, 2022 Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 237 8.1.j than the bowl or any other part of Edmonds, she suggested the city attorney may want to consider whether that is a possible civil rights violation . Glenn Douglas, Edmonds, a resident of the Gateway District of the Highway 99 corridor, thanked the council for including the emergency ordinance regarding the CG zone along Highway 99 on tonight's agenda and urged the council to pass it. He echoed the previous comments regarding the 261 unit building proposed at 236' & 84', noting he lives very close to that very dangerous intersection and frequently hears accidents occur. When the Gateway District was changed to a commercial zone in 2017, the Highway 99 subarea plan, identified mitigation measures to soften the transition between the CG zone and adjacent residential units. In particular, the code was to included stepbacks for buildings 75 feet high when adjacent to or across the street from single family residential buildings. The current code only has stepbacks for the adjacent side and does not include the mitigation cited in the plan for stepbacks when located across the street. The proposed Terrace Place apartments on 84t' & 236t' Street will be across the street from single family residential units and adjacent to 3-story condominiums. The ordinance the council will consider tonight will remedy the omission in the code to help provide the transition to single family that was intended in the subarea plan and identified as mitigation measures in the EIS. He was one of the signatories of the letter sent to council yesterday requesting a moratorium on building permits in the area until this code is reconciled with the subarea plan. Passing the ordinance tonight will address the concerns in that letter and avoid the moratorium that would otherwise be needed. Jack Malek, Shoreline, a realtor with Windermere representing Karen Wiggins in the sale of Sound View Plaza, referred to the original designated street front map and the extension in the BD2 district from mid -block 2nd Avenue south to James Street which he did not feel was appropriate for that street. The buildings in that short segment of the corridor were left off the original design for good reason; the buildings should not be limiting to just office and retail and the southern end of the block is better suited for residential. The Sound View Plaza building has been on the market for two years with no sale or lease; restricting it to office and retail is difficult without extensive tenant improvements. He encouraged the council to leave that segment off the map of the designated street front. Mayor Nelson described procedures for virtual audience comments. Will Magnuson, Edmonds, referred to the development code regarding BD zoning and asked the council to provide their full support to the Architectural Design Board's recommendation for BD2 zoning and require the inclusion of commercial space for any new BD2 development. The core areas of Edmonds including the neighborhoods of downtown, Highway 99, Westgate and elsewhere have evolved to provide more public amenities including entertainment, recreation as well as goods and services for the community. An abundance of these treasured assets provide the synergy required to provide a truly, walkable, vibrant, safe and sustainable community. Slow but steady progress has been made toward the creation of this synergy and more work needs to be done. He liked the convenience of public and commercial amenities within convenient walking distance but more businesses and amenities are needed to provide a sustainable energy in core neighborhoods and communities. The downtown core should remain focused on the community by requiring any new development parcels to include commercial space along Main Street inclusive of parcels to Dayton Street and extending from the waterfront up to the Frances Anderson Center. Mr. Magnuson continued, any discussion regarding commercial development should focus on clarity and reliability to the citizens and community of Edmonds and developers will be fine. During his career in commercial real estate development, he learned to prioritize every development decision toward the user and property management, creating a place coveted by tenants, visitors and community alike while offering a quality project designed and built for long term maintenance and sustainability. This development focus provides a successful project for everyone including developers, bankers, investors, tenants, visitors and neighbors by providing a project which will be a long term asset to the community. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 4, 2022 Page 3 Packet Pg. 238 8.1.j He urged the council to support the ADB's recommendation and implement immediate zoning for all BD2 parcels to include commercial space. Judi Gladstone, Edmonds, said she was unable to be present tonight due to Yom Kippur and appreciated the opportunity to participate online. A resident of the Gateway District of the Highway 99 corridor, she expressed her concern about the 261 unit Terrace Place apartment building proposed in her neighborhood. She urged the council to pass the emergency ordinance on tonight's agenda which will help address some of the issues the building creates, acknowledging the ordinance would not solve everything. The 261 unit Terrace Place development is proposed for the corner of 84" & 2361h Street SW; there is an existing problem with speeding on 84th, a 2-lane very busy road with no sidewalks and 236' is used as the main road to Madrona School with a traffic light at SR-104 but no sidewalks for the students. There are twice as many accidents at the intersection of 236th & 84t' as there are at the intersection of 238t' & 84t''. These transportation issues will be exacerbated by the traffic created by the Terrace Place development. The Hwy 99 subarea plan relies on the City's transportation plan to provide for infrastructure improvements that mitigate the impacts of development; however, the subarea plan EIS focuses on impacts to Hwy 99 and the movement of traffic through intersections along the Highway 99. Ms. Gladstone continued, it is insufficient to address the impacts to the residential neighborhoods in the district. The assumptions and mitigation regarding transportation and pedestrian safety should be reconsidered in the FEIS five-year review that the council pulled from the agenda in August. This issue, along with others, warrant requiring either a supplemental EIS or a change to the mitigation in the subarea plan. To have any impact on the development, the council must act quickly before the building permit application is filed. Like many of her neighbors, she was unaware the area was upzoned from multifamily to general commercial in 2017. If she had been asked then if she wanted a 6-story, 261 unit building across the street from single family residents, it would have caught her attention. She assured if the council undertook a review of the plan and EIS, they would surely get more engagement from the neighborhood. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, recalled a council comment that Item 9.1 had been removed from the agenda. He was unsure why the council didn't vote to amend the agenda after the council meeting started, noting there was no 9.1 on the online agenda. He suggested considering that and voting when the agenda is amended. Chapter 20.70 ECDC establishes the procedure and criteria that the City will use to decide upon vacations of streets, alleys and public easements. The City code expressly states the City vacates public easements. ECDC 20.70.060.G states an appraisal is not required if a utility easement only is proposed to be vacated. Despite this, the City has required an appraisal and can release the utility easement under State law RCW 35.94 which says nothing about the release of a utility easement, and does not include the word release or easement. RCW 35.94 talks about releasing or selling public utility works, plants or systems owned by the City. Resolution 1375 states the City releases all ownership interest in the stormwater facilities located upon or within the vacated 92" d Avenue Street right-of-way as well as the stormwater facilities located through the Westgate Chapel property at 22901 Edmonds Way. Westgate Chapel shall acknowledge in writing that upon vacation it shall assume ownership and maintenance responsibilities for these facilities. Mr. Reidy asked whether a private party can assume ownership of public assets, public stormwater facilities located outside the street that was vacated. It had nothing to do with the street that was vacated but the City acted as if the applicant could assume ownership of stormwater facilities before the City ever talked about whether the stormwater facility assets were surplus to the City's needs and comingled two very different things into one legislative action. There is no denying that Resolution 1375 exists, the 2016 city council adopted the resolution on November 15, 2016 with City Attorney Jeff Taraday in attendance. He encouraged the council to form a citizen taskforce to review the historical conduct of city attorneys and recommend how the City should obtain and manage legal advice. He urged the council not to co - mingle two different legislative outcomes into one vote later tonight. If the council wants to vote on Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 4, 2022 Page 4 Packet Pg. 239 8.1.j something as if it is an emergency, the council should vote and if the emergency vote does not pass, there should be a second motion to pass it as a regular ordinance instead of co -mingling it. Kevin Smith, Edmonds, Economic Development Commissioner but speaking as a citizen, local business owner and CPA regarding the BD2 zoning and proposed agenda item, said the joint meeting between the planning board and EDC overwhelmingly favored extending the designated street front requirements to the entire BD2 zone and recommended addressing the long term zoning in the 2024 comprehensive plan. He supported doing that because, first, in his professional capacity as a CPA, he speaks with business owners daily. A consistent theme he hears in Edmonds is the lack of available retail space in the downtown core because as soon as retail -oriented space is opened, regardless of the configuration, it is leased. Businesses want to locate in Edmonds, new businesses and industries move in and the City is rapidly growing as a result. Second, commercial office buildings such as services are moving at a different pace. The City needs to be careful and not have a kneejerk reaction to point in time circumstances. The governor's emergency declaration is still in place and shifts back to in -office work have been slow to occur. Additional commercial office leases are often 5-10 years old so a combination of the pandemic and lease -locked businesses has likely led to a lack of mobility in commercial office space. It would behoove the City to look toward the 2024 comprehensive plan as an ideal time to address the core long-term strategy as it will allow two years of post -pandemic economic activity to inform decisions. Mr. Smith continued, third, the downtown core has been rapidly growing over the last decade; his biggest concern was shutting out business growth through zoning changes. The inevitable consequence of such action is reducing areas for businesses of all types to locate. Fourth, major attractions will open next year, Civic Park and Main Street Commons. These will undoubtedly change consumer and commercial patterns and create new visitors and new desirability for the downtown area. Understanding those impacts needs to be considered with major changes to the zoning. He summarized major changes to the zoning structure should not be made in a vacuum and should be address through a broad process with heavy public involvement and the use of post -pandemic data. The 2024 comprehensive plan is the right move. He assured this was not an anti -housing position; housing is important and needs to be a focus area. He personally believed the most vibrant developments were those with a strong mix of commercial and residential; while it may not be the most profitable to the developer, it [inaudible] pencil out or in the best interest of the City. Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, thanked Mayor Nelson for his speech and expressed appreciation for what he is doing. She agreed with the previous comments about the downtown zone. She urged the council to be careful about zoning on the hill; residents are proud of their neighborhoods and do not want 5-story buildings across the street or in their backyards either. Edmonds does not need to be like other cities; for example, Seattle is having a lot of problems like the recent shooting in Crown Hill. She urged the City to keep Edmonds the same as much as possible. She understood progress was inevitable to a point but attention needs to be paid to the entire City, not just the bowl but everywhere. She noted 84t' isn't the only place with speeding problems, people drive down 80t' 60 mph day and night and she hasn't seen a turn signal in five years. There were campers in vans on 80t' last night, but she did not call the police because she didn't want to bother them. 7. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM JEFFREY JOHNSON AND KATHLEEN BARRETT 8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 4, 2022 Page 5 Packet Pg. 240 8.1.j 5. REVISIT BD2 DESIGNATED STREET FRONT CODE AMENDMENT (AMD2022-0003) Senior Planner Mike Clugston explained this is revisiting the BD2 Designated Street Front map as well as the use table that the council approved via an interim ordinance earlier this year. The designated street front is where adjacent parcels have to have a certain depth and a certain floor height for commercial on the ground floor. He displayed the current designated street front map for all the BD zones: VeyKH D-4---1—M1 gH 7-- D-ig amd st— F. hpF Y OALEY ST HFk a � l < t m fe! _ PPe H9I a _ PPS � +$PI+ iL--I—y-_i� � r e wKNV� 9 w14xVT ! Ord, 3865 Dec,zaii � € BD Use Table (16.43.020) O Clarify ambiguities O Fill in blanks in uses created by Ord. 3955 O Reference ground floor in ECDC 16.43.030.13 for locational requirements Downtown Mixed Commercial (2006-2020 Comprehensive Plan) O "To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses, with commercial entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development. The first floor of buildings must provide pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian -scale design features, differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floor of the building. The design of interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual business spaces can be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. When the rear of a property adjoins a residentially designated property, floor area that is located behind commercial street frontage may be appropriate for residential use...." O BD code developed to implement comprehensive plan language Designated Street Front O Map on the left is interim map created by council. Interim is applicable through December 1, 2022 O Map on the right is recommendation from planning board and EDC to extend the blue line to all BD2 parcels to be more consistent with the comprehensive plan. ■ Commercial on all ground floors to meet existing code standards and cannot have multifamily only buildings adjacent to the extended map areas Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 4, 2022 Page 17 Packet Pg. 241 8.1.j � �ealgnatee SEreelFmnl - �Qa C.s. ea S-1 FenE OF '"Eos Exhl� sr .s oa .bz "blue line" 12-foot...E .. .a.asnunimurn ground I,. - oER w height (15 feet in BD ..� specific lesl Ord. 4262 . . Proposed' Interim L Permanen? a � c - June 2022 0. ,, m BDz DSF... • Market Demand Analysis o Would designated street front restrictions inhibit market demand for residential development? o Is there existing market demand for a mixed commercial building? o Is there market demand for solely commercial buildings? • Market Analysis Area raaean. �>�m eou3,.asaaEm.ea.�. a.m..a w em..wiMe,�., rn..a,..r. e.F.�mese..�n......areao.maw��...v e.m.eeq Kie..E�pilanE • Commercial Space Demand RETAIL MARKET Current available Average Days on Market (DOM) all 5F types of spaces spaces Historical Days on Market— NIA 255 DOM (Historical) Last 3.5 years General Retail 5 276 DOM Current Vacant — Not listed: 1 NIA C'est La Vie Business appears closed — 1 NIA Not listed: Bop N Burper OFFICE MARKET Current available Average Days on Market (DOM) all SF types of spaces spaces Historical Days on Market — N/A 230 DOM (Historical) Last 3.5 years 1000 to 2000 sf spaces are 7 307 DOM (Current) what currently is available Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 4, 2022 Page 18 Packet Pg. 242 8.1.j • Multifamily Rental Units Demand o Approximately 425 MF rental units in study area ■ 56% Two -bedroom ■ 34% One -bedroom ■ 10% Studio and Three -bedroom o 1 % vacancy rate in the study area ■ 5 — 6% vacancy rate considered strong and balanced market ■ Average DOM approximately 20 days • Option 1: Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning/Residential Option 3-story o Below grade garage o Residential on ground level, 2nd floor, 3rd floor • Option 2: Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning/Residential Option 3-story o Ground level parking and residential o Residential on 2' and 3rd floor • Option 3: Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning/Commercial Option 2-story o Ground level parking and commercial o Residential on 2nd floor o Photo examples of three-story development with a below grade commercial entrance (307 Bell Street) • Option 4: Edmonds Downtown Business BD2 Zoning/Commercial Option 3-story o Ground level parking and commercial o Residential on 2nd and 3" floor • Otak Market Demand Analysis Takeaways 1. One (1) floor residential over ground floor commercial ➢ Not economically feasible 2. Two (2) floors residential over ground floor commercial ➢ Economically feasible BUT exceeds 30' height limit 3. Recommended zoning change to get "two over one" ➢ Minor increase of building height 2' — 5' • Otak Recommendation o "It is recommended a minor increase in allowed building height be considered in the BD2 zone, as well as any other BD zones similarly affected. This height increase would create more flexibility for a developer to design a 3-story mixed use development. An increase of two (2) to five (5) feet in building height would encourage more 3-story mixed use redevelopment by making a third story feasible on more sites and allowing already feasible sites to be developed in a manner that avoids less desirable subterranean first floor commercial space. This recommended change is intended to make the Designated Street Front commercial requirement as feasible to integrate into a 3-story development as developing an all residential development. Any increases in height should be crafted with code language that limits all BD2 development to no more than 3-stories in height." • Next Steps o If fully extending designated street front to all BD2 parcels, consider code amendment to increase height to allow three stories to feasibly work in the BD zones during Comprehensive Plan update o Public Hearing — October 25 o Adoption — November 15 Councilmember Paine referred to the slide with the comparison of the two designated street fronts, recalling this began with development that was proposed on 6th Avenue that alerted the community about the aesthetics and loss of commercial. A decision was made to review the process which included obtaining a market analysis and adopting an interim ordinance. A lot of steps have been taken and the issue has morphed from the loss of commercial to considering the designated street front, and review by Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 4, 2022 Page 19 Packet Pg. 243 8.1.j the EDC and the planning board. She referred to the starting point with the interim ordinance in June 2022 which expanded the designated street front to a couple areas and said she felt the proposed permanent BD2 designated street front was a vast overreach. She appreciated having the opportunity to look at this again and planned to walk around to see how the buildings were being used. She wanted to have a collective and thoughtful review and street proofing to look at the business that will be impacted. This is a massive change that will cause big challenges for people because it will be a lot more restrictive. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Ordinance 3918, amending Chapters 16.43 and 22.43 ECDC relating to the development regulation and design standards for the downtown BD zones. She recalled former Community Services Director Stephen Clifton utilized Roger Brooks and thousands of citizens were involved in the downtown BD districting. She pointed out building heights were raised in 2013 from 25 feet to 30 feet. She had no interest in adding any more height. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS AND SECONDED TO NOT HAVE ANY HEIGHT INCREASES IN ANY BD ZONES UNTIL WE DO A FULL REVIEW OF THE ENTIRE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN WHICH TOOK PLACE IN 2011, 2012 AND 2013. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled in 2013 a change was made to the 25-foot building height to get rid of the 5-foot stepback and building heights were raised to 30 feet. She did not support doing any height increases until the master plan for the downtown area is reviewed. Council President Olson said she was aware there have been conversations at the planning board and the EDC about the possibility of taking a more holistic look in the context of the comprehensive plan. The consultant recommended that; Edmonds has lower heights than comparable cities like Mukilteo who also have view considerations. She was not saying she was in favor of increasing heights, but she was in favor of vetting it fully and having a full community conversation on that subject, but had no interest in having a community conversation during budget season. She agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis that the conversation about extending the designated street front should not have anything to do with building heights. Councilmember Teitzel recalled during his first term on council in either 2015 or 2016, the council had a robust discussion about reducing floor to ceiling heights in BD1 from 15 feet to 12-13 feet to achieve a third floor in BDL Mr. Clugston said he was not involved with that project. Councilmember Teitzel continued, if a third floor could be achieved within a 30 foot height limit by reducing the first floor from 15 feet to 12 feet, he asked why that could not be done in BD2. Ms. McLaughlin answered she would need to consult with someone who understands commercial market demands in terms of floor heights. Three stories may be achievable from a purely mathematically standpoint but she would need to research the desirability and leaseability of those spaces. Councilmember Teitzel said he spoke about this with a commercial developer who has a project underway in Edmonds and he thought it could work with 12-foot minimum first floor and even potentially going down to 10 feet. He favored having more discussions with the commercial development industry to determine what could work within that 30-foot envelope. Ms. McLaughlin said the market demand analysis tried to get at that. The below grade access points are some of the ways current developers reach 30 feet which is not desirable from the pedestrian realm at the sidewalk level. While they can achieve it, sometimes the implications are not great. Councilmember Chen said his question was similar to Councilmember Teitzel about reducing the first floor height. There are successful developments where the commercial entrance is a step down. He asked if that would be a viable solution for a developer. Ms. McLaughlin answered for the developer yes, but from an urban design outcome, below grade access detracts from the pedestrian experience. With the comprehensive plan policy around human design, a below grade entrance is not as appealing for access Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 4, 2022 Page 20 Packet Pg. 244 8.1.j and it does not provide as much interest as level grade access points. If that outcome continues, it will have a cumulatively impact on the pedestrian environment downtown. Councilmember Chen asked the about the negative impacts of a 2-5 foot height increase and whether it was primarily view blockage. Ms. McLaughlin answered the EDC, planning board and staff agree this should be a comprehensive analysis and the comprehensive plan update is an appropriate time to evaluate that. The recommendation is not to address it tonight, the intent of raising the issue tonight it is under the lens of the adoption of designated street front. The designated street front locks in the requirement for the ground floor to commercial, thereby limiting development potential. If the comprehensive plan update takes two years, she wanted the council to be aware that that is a limiting factor. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (4-0-2), COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL, TIBBOTT, AND BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN AND PAINE ABSTAINING. Council President Olson commented with boots on the ground and as a longtime attendee of Chamber of Commerce, DEMA and Ed!, she was aware there is a lot of commercial demand in the center of the City. When she drove the entire BD2 map, it seemed like there was an area that was not super business friendly. If that is where there are longer vacancy rates, there may be an area that is not appropriate to be BD2 and it could be changed either during the comprehensive plan or if it is holding up commerce and is not a good place for BD2, making a small tweak in the short term. She recalled the area south of Homeland did not seem appropriate to be BD2. Ms. McLaughlin said staff can evaluate that and bring it back as part of the proposal next time this is before council. 6. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin advised Planning Manager Kernen Lien is the project manager for the comprehensive plan update. She was hopeful councilmembers have seen some of the branding for the comprehensive plan, Everyone Edmonds, on the streets, in papers, at coffee shops, etc. Staff and the consultant tried hard to get the word out and to gather feedback throughout the summer and she welcomed feedback from the council. In advance of going out to the public, time was spent to develop an inclusive engagement strategy that would attract under -represented people in the community that the City often doesn't hear from during public processes. She reviewed: Overview o Comprehensive plan branding o Six week themed visioning outreach o Visioning next step o Comprehensive plan update workplan overview Branding o PRR consultant engaged to develop: ■ Branding `Tpp05 '. ■ Templates ■ Surveys ■ Translation services ■ Review of past City outreach services Comprehensive plan Visioning Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes October 4, 2022 Page 21 Packet Pg. 245 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Departmental Budget Review: Planning & Development; Parks, Recreation, Human Services Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Dave Turley Background/History These presentations will be a report out on the 2022 budgeted items and accomplishments, and an overview of the 2023 proposed budget requests. Staff Recommendation No recommendation, presentation only. Narrative N/A Attachments: 3 PDD budget presentation 2 2022 PRHS Q1-Q3 Accomplishments 12023 Budget Presentation_Parks_Rec_Human Sery RedPDF Packet Pg. 246 Development 2023 Budget Susan McLaughlin, Planning and Development Director Packet Pg. 247 Who we are- permitting team Leif Bjorback, Building Official Kristin Johns, Permitting Supervisor Denise Nelson, Senior Permit Coordinator Christina Barson, Senior Permit Coordinator Les Krestel, Building Inspector Eric Carter, Senior Combination Building Inspector Kevin Bloomfield, Plans Examiner Donovan Akau, Plans Examiner Michelle Martin, Administrative Assistant Michael Clugston, Senior Planner Brad Shipley, Senior Planner Deb Powers, Urban Forest Planner Michelle Szafran, Associate Planner Tristan Sewell, Planner Rose Haas, Planner Planning Manager (Vacant) Transportation Planner (Vacant) Additional Permit Review Fire Safety Karl Fitterer, Assistant Fire Marshal Engineering Rob English, City Engineer Emiko Rodarte, Administrative Assistant Jennifer Machuga, Engineering Permit Coordinator Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Engineering Program Manager Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager Jennifer Lambert, Engineering Technician JoAnne Zulauf, Engineering Technician Natalie Griggs, Engineering Technician 8.2.a What we do Planning & Development's mission is to preserve and enhance our community's environment and quality of life. We take pride in: • Providing accurate, consistent, and timely permit processing • Improving and extending public infrastructure • Promoting building safety and managed land use • Implementing adopted City codes, policies, plans, and standards • Protecting the public's health and safety • Providing excellent customer service Development Services Permit History 8.2.a $2,000,000 $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 2,000 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 $0 iMi1 0 Ln in n W m 0. j N m Kt Ln tD N W m 0 .-j N m Kt Ln o n w m 0 .-I N m q Ln o N w m o -i oa o� oa oa o� m m m m m m m m m m v v o v 0 o v 0 o v 0 0 0 N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m v 0 v v 0 v v 0 v v v v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v v -4 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N �TOtaI Devel Svc Revenue # Building Permits ---Trend 8.2.a 2022 Development Review: Snapshot Park Impact Fees collected in 2022 (through Oct 31): Projected total of Issued Building Permits for 2022 Building permit fees Plan review fees + $775k Staff time spent on permitting 17% BUILDING ■ Permitting Other 48% PLANNING 78% ADMIN _ $1.2 million projected revenue in 2022 Packet Pg. 251 Issued Applied * Design Review e Pre-App * Rezone Port Office Building Main Street Commons Civic Field 7ili, Bel l St Apts. WWTP GBH Holdings Carbon VTRecovery Pine Park �1 �i� i ON Edmonds Way PRD 04'sW1i 1 Paradise Heights idiom R Kisan " Westgate Apts. Station Brass Tack �- r Glacier Environmental Ford Hunter r N, �R Townhomes Au. n.n.iy Mill! Own 0 1 ........... GRE ,.. ......: Apartmen Housing SunA-...... Hope 1162 11 I= Townhomes* Edmonds j U Crossing Apts. Terrace JA Apollo Apts. Edmonds Townhomes Place 8.2.a Green[ ownhoi I Packet Pg. 252 1 8.2.a 2022 Planning Projects Carry forward from 2021 Street Tree Plan $29,193; The Watershed Company Status: Project nearly complete; Led by Parks in partnership with PDD/PW Climate Action Plan s $18,639 (ESA); $14,894 (Cascadia) Status: Final draft received; 4( i adoption likely in Q1 2023 Canopy Assessment $21,250 Status: Project Completed Highway 99 Community Renewal $42,685 Status: Work nearly complete. Anticipated for adoption in Q1 Packet Pg. 253 8.2.a 2022 Planning Projects Decision packages (carry forward) Climate Champions Series 1 $20,000 Status: working in partnership with CPC; event anticipated in Q2 Rooftop Solar Grant $150, 000 Status: grant program is drafted Packet Pg. 254 8.2.a 2022 Planning Projects Budget amendment (Planning Professional Services) Comprehensive Plan $62,500; half from WA Dept. of Commerce Status. Initial visioning complete, next step is scoping i T Building Professional Services $167,000 Status: $106K spent ytd on consultant plan Packet Pg. 255 8.2.a 2022 Planning Projects Funded through professional services/arpa 2024 Comprehensive Plan Visioning wk 1 $60,805 rtiv Status: Completed branding and p g managed comment cataloging and analysis from visioning phase qBD2 Graphics s $3,000 Status: Illustrative graphics hics for development code 13132 Market Analysis itlo $20,032 Status: Studied potential impacts of 4 changes to development code g p Green Streets ivt $89,250 Status: Completed 10% Design for two pilot projects and has nearly completed a green street investment network Packet Pg. 256 8.2.a 2022 Planning Projects Funded through professional services Tree Code Public Engagement $30,000 4�. Status: RFP ready to be issued Reimagining Neighborhoods Streets $91,925 Street & Public Space Typologies Status: Package is nearly complete; adoption anticipated in Q1 2023 $71,705 Public Space Activation Toolkit and 1 neighborhood outreach r 'tt 416, Status: Neighborhood outreach complete; activation projects underway; Toolkit drafted; 0-1 p J Y> > adoption anticipated in Q1 2023 Equitable Engagement Framework $72,650 Status: Framework finalized; provides an internal tool that standardizes inclusive engagement strategies with the goal of increasing participation from historically under -represented communities and building trust over time. Packet Pg. 257 8.2.a 2022 Planning Projects Previously budgeted &completed this year Waterfront Issues Study $45,000 Status: Study finalized; Comprehensive Plan will address recommendations E Climate & Equity Gap Analysis $45,000 Status: Analysis finalized; o Recommendations will be carried into Compreh( 10>iv scoping L Q a M r a Packet Pg. 258 8.2.a 2023 Department Goals Efficient and accessible customer service Operationalizing equity M" Building resilience Packet Pg. 259 8.2.a 2023 Decision Packages 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update $300,000 (project carries into 2024) Description: Required by GMA. Creates a 20-year vision and growth strategy for the City. 4f Facade Improvement Program $45,000 Description: Support local business and revitalization of neighborhood business districts; grant program to address deferred maintenance and aesthetics Packet Pg. 260 8.2.a 2023 Work Plan Goal 1: Efficient and Accessible Customer Service Graphic Support Hearing Examiner $50,000 $40,000 Enables graphic illustrations to support code Critical support for complex discretionary modernization and other on call needs to approvals facilitate design regulations or discussions Meeting Minutes $10,000 Critical support for Boards& Commissions (PB, ADB, HPB, and TB) Hybrid Meeting Support $20,000 Support transition to hybrid meetings, as needed t 2023 Work Plan Goal 2: Operational izing Equity Community Engagement $50,000 Funding to implement the EEF (translations, interpretations, mailings, compensation for community -based orgs) Consultation Manager $10,000/annual Software program that catalogs community feedback in a systematic way across teams, projects, divisions, and/or depts; this allows us to track input over time, which improves our planning acumen and helps to build trust (recommendation from EEF) 8.2.a Packet Pg. 262 2023 Work Plan Goal 3: Building Resilience Building Professional Services $43,000 Ongoing support for complex projects, requiring specialists' reviews Critical Aquifer Recharge Code $75,000 Will be addressed in Comprehensive Plan; will be part of a code amendment package Green Building Incentive Program $30,000 Encourage decarbonization of existing new buildings; incentivize LEED Digitization $28,000 Digitize historic subdivision files 8.2.b Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Department 2022 Quarter 1 Accomplishments January 1 - March 31, 2022 Administration • PROS Plan — draft Plan published on January 7; several Planning Board presentations including two Public Hearings; Planning Board recommendation to City Council during March including two meeting (continued) Public Hearing. As of March 315t, Council approval pending. • January and February provided information, materials and attendance of numerous Council meetings to support the 2022 budget amendment process through completion. • Reopened the Frances Anderson Center on March 16, 2022 after being closed for nearly 2 years. • Completed sale and contracts for 12 memorial benches and 2 picnic tables. • Finalized 3 concessions agreements (Learn to Ride a Bike, Outdoor Preschool, Outdoor Camp) • Finalized lease agreements for all Frances Anderson Tenants to include Council approval of limited rent increases. • Finalized special event agreements for the Farmers Market, Edmonds SpringFest and the Edmonds Arts Festival. Contracts authorized by City Council for 2022. Parks Planning & Projects • Civic Center Playfield construction project proceeding. Schedule has had more than 30 "No Work" days due to heavy rains and weather issues. Project is still within original budget although change orders have committed a significant amount of the management reserve. Public update presented to City Council on March 15t. Off -site stormwater mitigation adjacent to Yost Park is designed and in permit review with construction slated for this summer. • Reviewed draft Parks Maintenance Assessment, slated to be shared with the Division in April. • Parks Maintenance Greenhouse variance materials developed, submittal scheduled for early April. • Completed 8-month repair project of Bracketts Landing North Restroom to include wastewater drain line replacement, new drain and vent systems, interior paint and replacement of roof and skylights. • Conducted bid process for re -plastering of Yost Pool, contractor selected and contract being finalized with repair work slated to begin mid -April 2022. • Successfully transferred a $258,000 State Appropriation for administration by the City. The grant was originally secured by the Edmonds Rotary for the Civic Park fully inclusive playground. • Continued work on possible land acquisitions including continued discussions with land owners. Packet Pg. 264 8.2.b Park Maintenance • Replaced 6 deteriorating benches, and refurbished 4 picnic tables at Brackett's Landing South • Replacement of Chlorine Injector at Yost Pool. • Managed hazard tree removals at multiple park sites. • Ongoing work with architects and engineers on Hwy 99 landscaping and irrigation project. • Managing and supporting Volunteer Projects. Recreation Division • Managed programs and instructors with the extended closure of the Frances Anderson to include moving classes to the Waterfront Center and ongoing refunds for cancelled classes. • Developed a Department branding and marketing guide to ensure consistency and professionalism. • Updated all signage, room configurations, hallway configurations, increased front desk staffing and communications with public regarding the March 16 re -opening of the Frances Anderson Center. • Hired 2 new part-time Front Desk staff to help cover evening shifts at Frances Anderson Center and Edmonds Waterfront Center. Hired 1 part-time Facility Monitor for weekend facility rentals. • Developed and launched an enhanced communications strategy, seeking engagement and database growth. o Increase in Facebook followers from 996 in late January to currently 1,050 and Instagram followers from 729 in January to currently 752. o Facebook reach has increased to close to 7,000 (+300 %). Instagram reach has increased to 530 (+22 %). o Facebook post engagements have increased from 957 in late January to 1,123 currently. o Newsletter mailed in March 2022 to 25,000 Edmonds households. • Developed digital CRAZE and distributed information via variety of electronic channels and newsletter mailing. Compiled information for Summer Craze in Q1. • Created the structure for the Edmonds Summer Day Camp Program. This day camp will serve youth entering grades 2-6 for 10 weeks in summer 2022. Within the first week of the Edmonds Day Camp registration opening, 205 spots were filled out of 320 total available. • Received a SEEK (Summer Experiences and Enrichment for Kids) Grant. Amount received was $86,825 that will be issued on a reimbursement basis to fund the Edmonds Summer 2 Packet Pg. 265 8.2.b Day Camp Program. This grant funding will help provide full scholarships, program supplies and equipment and staffing cost. • Scheduled adult Pickleball leagues for 34 teams. • Currently offering a variety of fitness and wellness classes (13 total). • Oversaw Meadowdale Preschool, which has full enrollment with 14 participants in both the Morning and Afternoon sessions. • Scheduled Gymnastics workshops at Edmonds Waterfront Center. • 130 shelter permits created since February 7th, 50 of which have been created through the online rental portal, approximately 40% of all rentals. (Online reservations are new as of 2021) • Approximately 1,700 hours of field rental reservations • Approximately 300 hours of gymnasium rental reservations • Launched annual flower basket and corner park adoption program: 0 83 of the 88 available Flower Baskets adopted 0 34 of the 74 available Corner Parks adopted Environmental Education: • Completion of the Environmental Resources Portal • Completed Salmon Safe Certification Project site visits • Hired three seasonal Ranger -Naturalists Arts & Culture Division • Facilitated orientation for new Arts Commission with specialty in literary arts. • Organized call for young artists for 2022 Best Book Poster Exhibit for 3rd graders. • Sent out quarterly Arts Bulletin e-newsletter. • Managed Arts Commission selection of artists for four new 2022 temporary On the Fence exhibits. • Sent out call for presenters for Write on the Sound writers' conference and worked with Steering Committee to select applicants. • Facilitated donation process and worked with Floretum Garden Club to create proposal for public art mosaic sculpture accepted by City Council. • Facilitated public art process for Civic Park and worked with artist to present proposal at Public Hearing for City Council approval of design concept. • Scheduled 19 concerts in parks for summer 2022, with one new location at Hickman Park for a Sunday concert. • Coauthored grant submittal for Creative District capital grant proposal for final section of 41" Avenue Cultural Corridor concept design. • Issued contracts to local cultural nonprofits for 2022 Tourism Promotion Awards approved in budget. • Updated and sent out call for submissions for 2023 Tourism Promotion Awards. 3 Packet Pg. 266 8.2.b Youth Commission • Held a virtual retreat at the end of January to focus on the goals for the Youth Commissions in 2022 • Established a plan for contacting Youth Commissions or similar organizations across the state • Scheduled plans for volunteering at the Edmonds Food Bank Human Services Division • Finalized Homelessness Taskforce recommendations and distributed to Mayor, City Council and Media on February 8, 2022. • Developed Urgent Needs Program and distributed first 50 care kits to first responders. • Completed Homelessness Assessment with Kone Consulting and presented to City Council on March 1, 2022. Full report distributed April 2022. • Provided support for distribution of ARPA funding to include re -opening the grant portal, ordinance revisions and City Council meetings regarding potential reallocation. • Conducted multiple meetings regarding Snohomish County's efforts to enhance shelter in South County utilizing ARPA and HB 1590 funding and potential grant funding. o Snohomish County Office of Recovery, January 12, 2022 & March 23, 2022 o Congressman Rick Larsen, February 16, 2022 o Verdant Health Commission, March 8, 2022 • Coordinated services for 42 individuals to include gaining emergency shelter for three individuals and coordination with Adult Protective Services for another individual. • Ongoing oversight of five long-term motel vouchers for Edmonds Emergency Shelter program through Snohomish County. 4 Packet Pg. 267 8.2.b Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts & Human Services Department 2022 Quarter 2 Accomplishments April 1 - June 30, 2022 Administration 1. PROS Plan several presentations to City Council for their review and incorporation of their suggested revisions. Approval was achieved on June 281n 2. Recruited and hired new Parks Planner/Project Manager, Kyle Woods, who is scheduled to start on July 181n 3. Completed sale and contracts for 12 memorial benches and 1 picnic table. 4. Finalized 3 concessions agreements (Popsicle Vendor, Shaved Ice Vendor and Yost Pool year-round operations) 5. Finalized special event agreements for the 41" of July Parade & 5K, Taste Edmonds, and Classic Car Show. Contracts authorized by City Council for 2022. 6. Managed partnership with the Blue Heron Canoe Family's expanded special event in City Park. 7. Facilitated and provided City oversight for the Summer Market and Edmonds Arts Festival. 8. Facilitated donation acceptance for significant donation to Parks for $2.9M. 9. Working with Police Department regarding a repeat healthy and safety vandalism issue at the Olympic Beach restroom. 10. Working with Development Services Department on Hwy 99 Revitalization, Redefining Streets & Public Spaces Design and Green Streets projects. 11. Developed system to accommodate access for city's board and commission public meetings to enable the continuation of remote meetings using rooms at the Waterfront Center. 12. Developing working relationship with Edmonds College Horticulture program for potential specialized park maintenance projects. 13. Participated in Public Works and Community Services/Economic Development Director interviews. Parks Planning & Projects 1. Yost Pool Re -Plaster Project completed and closed out. Not full replastering, but an approach of significant patching. Unfortunately, the first option was cost prohibitive, but since this is the third time the pool was only patched, it will require full replastering. 2. Civic Center Playfield construction project is proceeding well. Much of the underground infrastructure, dewatering and rough site grading is complete and park amenities are starting to take form such as the skate park, athletic field lighting bases, inclusive playground forms. The sports courts are paved as well as 6t" Avenue sidewalk poured. Packet Pg. 268 8.2.b 3. Shared the Parks Maintenance Assessment with all maintenance staff in April. Working on starting implementation. 4. Parks Maintenance Greenhouse variance approved by Hearings Examiner. Construction Documents being finalized and permitting development started. 5. Draft Salmon Safe Certification report was reviewed by city staff and also presented to Planning Board. Additional work requested by Planning Board which is being completed by both consultant, Public Works and Parks Departments. 6. Yost Park bridge structural assessment completed for failing potentially failing bridge. Recommendation is to monitor for remainder of summer and close for the fall/winter rainy season. 7. Dayton Street street trees (10) removal and replacement, working on not using metal grates but pervious surface instead. Park Maintenance 1. Significant increase to Yost Pool maintenance operations with Cascade Swim Club scheduling using it 7 days a week. Pool chemical checks are necessary on Saturdays and Sundays to ensure pool safety. Cascade Swim Club has been very helpful and supportive in maintenance efforts, providing volunteer work parties to assist in preparing for the full opening of the pool. 2. City Park Spray Park prepared and opened the Friday before Memorial Day. Spray Park will close in September depending on weather. 3. Installed an additional ADA parking stall at Marina Beach Park near the dog park entrance. 4. Pressure washed Yost Park and Seaview Park pickle ball / tennis courts. 5. On June 2" d, nearly 100 hanging flower baskets were installed in the downtown area. 6. Significantly trimmed back invasive blackberries for almost a linear mile of the Interurban trail to increase safety. 7. Installed the new Bill Anderson Viewing Scope at Edmonds Marsh on the west end of the board walk. Unfortunately, it was vandalized within days of installation and the Ribbon Cutting ceremony needs to be postponed until the dedication plaques are replaced. 8. Many hours spent on seasonal and full-time staff recruitment, interviews, hiring and on -boarding. Still only 50% on seasonal staff due to hiring challenges. Recreation Division 1. 270 shelter rental permits issued since April, 400 permits total. 2. 1,550 hours of field rental permits issued since April, 3,250 hours total. 3. 160 hours in gym rental reservations since April, 460 hours total. 4. Planned and implemented the annual Health & Fitness Expo — May 2111 at Edmonds Woodway High School Stadium sponsored by the Verdant Health Commission and in partnership with Move60 and the Edmonds School District. Participation numbers: a. 500+ members of the public in attendance b. 33 vendors promoting health/wellness and fitness for all ages Packet Pg. 269 8.2.b c. 131 Fun Run Runners (all ages) d. 29 schools represented by participants (24 in Edmonds) e. 16 zip codes represented by participants 5. Successfully planed, advertised, enrolled, hired staff and kicked off a new Summer Day Camp. Current enrollment numbers: a. 304 total enrollments out of 320 possible spots (94%) b. 38% of participants are on full scholarships based on having limited income (115 scholarships) this is made possible due to the SEEK grant that was acquired. 6. Launched Meadowdale Preschool AM and PM registration 2022-23 deposits to secure a spot were filled in 20 minutes. 7. Planned and coordinated 24 contracted youth camps at the Frances Anderson Center for Summer 2022. 8. Successfully completed Spring Adult Softball Leagues with 51 teams. 9. Successfully completed 2 Pickleball leagues with 48 total teams. 10. Added two new fitness classes; Yoga in the Park and Barre. 11. Completed indoor gymnastics classes and started indoor gymnastics camp for the first time since 2019 (all were outdoors during COVID). Hiring staff is an ongoing challenge. 12. Designed and published the Summer 2022 CRAZE recreation guide. This guide was done entirely online. 13. Established a Constant Contact account and currently have 7,011 contacts. Regular email contact to customers will begin in July. 14. Increased Facebook followers by 11%to 1,165 and Instagram followers by 6%to 800 15. 52% increase in Facebook post engagements have increased from 1,123 in March to 1, 710. Environmental Education 16. Managed a large volunteer effort on Earth Day, April 23 that included four sites and 120 participants. Trees were planted, invasive plants removed and as well as litter collected at beaches. 17. Planned and held the Watershed Fun Fair on May 14; an environmental education day that is free to attend at the Hatchery. 240 people participated, a new record. 18. Reached 2,500 school kids through the K-6 Spring Marine Education Program. Arts & Culture Division Public Art Collection: arranged for maintenance of four public art sculptures; completed Civic Art design contract and signed fabrication contract with artist Clark Wiegman. Supervised installation of two new 2022 temporary On the Fence exhibits. Completed updates of Public Art Database. Packet Pg. 270 8.2.b 2. Public Art Donations: Worked with Floretum Garden Club on donated public art mosaic sculpture commission and plaque to be installed Aug 15. Arts Commission accepted two donations of 2D art by Edmonds artists. 3. Write on the Sound (WOTS) Conference: Finalized schedule of presenters for Write on the Sound writers' conference in October 2022. Implemented marketing and preparations for online conference registration. 4. Summer Concerts: Marketed 19 Concerts in the Parks scheduled for summer 2022, with the first two on June 26 and July 3, and one new location for a Sunday concert at Hickman Park. Assisted with Uptown Market music performance program. 5. Poet's Perspective: Implemented new program with installation of temporary poetry exhibited in two areas of Edmonds, the new Neighborhood Office and outside the Library. 6. Exhibits: Restarted rotating art exhibits in Library and display cases which were on hold during past 2 years. 7. Arts Support grant programs: Advertised and awarded $13,500 of Create Grants to local artists and nonprofit arts organizations as carry over of 2021 one-time program. Reviewed applications and submitted recommendations for 2023 Tourism Promotion Awards for arts nonprofits totaling $20,000 to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. 8. Creative District: Worked with Economic Development to create window clings for Creative District businesses. Received approval of grant for Creative District capital grant for final section of 4t" Avenue Cultural Corridor concept design in partnership with Edmonds Center for the Arts. 9. Coordinated information booth and created materials to distribute on City Arts programs at Edmonds Arts Festival. 10. Highway 99 Gateway: Worked with PW team and consultants to confirm final design for medians. Human Services Division 1. Completed hiring and onboard training of the Compass Health Community Transitions Outreach Coordinator and Compass Health Masters of Social Work Supervisory team. 2. Coordinated services for 49 individuals to include gaining emergency shelter for 1 individual, permanent housing for another individual and coordination with Adult Protective Services and Code Enforcement for another. 3. Provided support for distribution of ARPA funding to include ordinance revisions to pre - qualify people receiving DSHS services. 4. Set up out stationing with the Community Resource Advocate of South Snohomish County in the Human Services office. 5. Coordinated Helping Hands Project Organization to do outreach once a month at the library for behavioral health services and other resources. 6. Ongoing oversight of five long-term motel vouchers for Edmonds Emergency Shelter program through Snohomish County. 7. Updated the Human Services Resource Guide online. 8. Received Council authorization to increase Program Manager to full-time. 4 Packet Pg. 271 8.2.b 9. Conducted multiple meetings regarding Snohomish County's efforts to enhance shelter in South County utilizing ARPA and HB 1590 funding and potential grant funding. Youth Commission 1. Partnered with the City of Edmonds, Sounds Salmon Solutions, Edmonds Stewards, and the Edmonds Citizen Tree board for Earth Day --supporting the beach cleanup event at Marina Beach Park and Brackett's Landing North. 2. Resumed in -person meetings with great enthusiasm from commissioners --clear they are burnt out on Zoom. 3. Presented annual report to city council while also appreciating graduating seniors 4. Held last meeting of the school seasons regular Youth Commission meetings. Packet Pg. 272 8.2.b Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department 2022 Quarter 3 Accomplishments July 1 - September 30, 2022 Administration 1. Effective September 1, 2022 the Arts & Cultural Division transferred to the Community Services/Economic Development Department. Our department will still manage the division's budget through the end of the year to support an easier transition. 2. New Parks Planner/Project Manager, Kyle Woods, started on July 18tn 3. Completed sale and contracts for all Civic Park memorial benches and picnic tables (17 benches & 5 picnic tables) and 4 additional benches citywide. 4. Facilitated and provided oversight of 6 concessions agreements (Kool Kids Ice Cream, Magnolia Forest Preschool, Quiet Heart Wilderness School; Rowlee Shaved Ice and Pedalheads, and Cascade Swim Club) 5. Finalized special event agreement for 2022 Oktoberfest. Contract authorized by City Council. 6. Facilitated and provided City oversight for the Summer Market, 41n of July Celebration, Taste Edmonds, Classic Car Show, Safety and Disaster Event and Oktoberfest events. 7. Working with Development Services and Facilities on Library flood restoration. 8. Submitted 2023 budget decision packages (operating & capital); updated year end estimates and completed 2023-2027 CIP/CFP to reflect recently adopted Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan update. 9. Identified a missing link in online feedback forms; resolved the issue and replied to 300 feedback forms. 10. Completed the build out of a recreation coordinator office in the Anderson Center. 11. Working with Development Services Department on Hwy 99 Revitalization, Redefining Streets & Public Spaces Design and Green Streets projects. Parks Planning & Projects 1. Civic Center Playfield construction project is still proceeding well with sod installation of athletic fields and open turf area, progress of the inclusive playground, (pre -fabricated) restroom foundation and utilities (delivery scheduled for October 18, 2022), shade structure frame, irrigation system, concrete walkway, rubberized track base and painting and striping of multipurpose courts. 2. Parks Maintenance Greenhouse variance approved by Hearings Examiner. Permit documents are being routed to the City planning department for building permit approval. Construction is anticipated to occur December 2022 —January 2023. Packet Pg. 273 8.2.b 3. 961h Ave Infiltration project went out to bid late September with related bid opening scheduled for October 11, 2022. This project will mitigate the stormwater impacts for the Civic Center Playfield project. America Rescue Plan Act funding for was approved for this project. 4. The draft Salmon Safe Certification report was to City Council. Initial approval was given to negotiate certification conditions and provide additional information about estimated impacts to city resources. 5. Yost Park bridge #6 was closed indefinitely on October 1, 2022. 6. Identified pedestrian improvements landscape beds for Dayton Street, Walnut Street, Main Street, and 196th ST SW for planting design and installation. 7. Started development of a parks asset inventory to assist with inventory control and management, asset life cycle management, strategic planning, and parks maintenance scheduling and planning. 8. A comprehensive project tracking sheet is being produced to better track capital, small works, and maintenance projects. 9. Final step of the SR 104 Downtown Edmonds sign was completed including fall hydroseeding to disturbed area as required by WSDOT for permit. 10. With Rich Lindsay's announced intent to retire, work is beginning to document his 50+ year experience and knowledge the Edmonds park system history. Park Maintenance 1. Continued operations of Yost Pool and Hazel Miller Spray Park 7 days a week. Yost Pool hot tub opened for use. 2. ADA parking stall improvements at Mathay Ballinger and Pine Street Parks. 3. Replaced 6 memorial benches at Marina Beach Park, work includes re -powder coating and plaque refurbishment. 4. Replenished safety fall material at city playgrounds. 5. Hydroseed around SR-104 Welcome to Edmonds sign. 6. Supported special events including Uptown Markets, Summer Market, 411 of July Celebration, Taste Edmonds, Classic Car Show, Safety and Disaster Event and Oktoberfest 7. Supported the installation of new art work for Floretum Garden club at 6th & Bell 8. Assisted in the planning for security fence at Public Safety building and parking lot. Recreation Division 1. Rentals — o Q3 had 46 shelter rental permits; 446 permits year to date. (100 more than 2021) o Q3 had 560 hours of field rental permits; 3,810 hours year to date. o Q3 had 50 hours in gym rental reservations; 510 hours year to date. 2. Designed and published the digital Fall 2022 CRAZE Recreation Guide. 2 Packet Pg. 274 8.2.b 3. Completed the re -instated Edmonds Day Camp Program, running for 10 weeks and with 312 registrations of children entering grades 2-6. Through funding from the SEEK Grant, a total of 105 full and 24 wrap -around care ($21,250) scholarships were provided. 4. Managed 21 contracted youth camps at the Frances Anderson Center and local parks serving more than 180 youth over 10 weeks of summer programming. 5. Started the school year at the Meadowdale Preschool program with full enrollment in both the morning and afternoon classes. 6. Adult Athletics program completion o Summer Adult Softball leagues (54 teams) o Senior Softball leagues (9 teams) o Summer Pickleball leagues (18 teams) o (After a 2-year pause) Volleyball leagues (14 teams) o (After a 2-year pause) 3 on 3 Basketball league (6 teams) 7. Staff set up and monitored nearly 30 city Board and Commission zoom meetings along with scheduling 21 non-profit organization meetings at Edmonds Waterfront Center. 8. Offered four Outdoor Movie Nights and for the first time, located them at different Edmonds parks. Expanding into various neighborhoods was very well received many requests to repeat for next year. Locations and approximate attendance included Frances Anderson Center (500), Hickman Park 375, Seaview Park (250) and City Park (250). Sponsorships totaled $3,050 and $734 was raised for program scholarships through concession stand sales. 9. Several new fitness classes were added to fall offerings. Mama Barre has grown rapidly, and added a second class due to its popularity. lyengar Yoga is adding three classes and a new program of Zumba/Zumba Moms classes beginning in October. 10. Utilizing Constant Contact to send regular monthly emails with registration information, new programs, special events, park updates and more. Customer email list size: 7,039 with a 52% average open rate. 11. Facebook engagement: 1,342 followers (177 new from Q2), reach is up 217%, page visits up 39% 12. Instagram engagement: 867 followers (67 new from Q2), reach is down 6.4%, profile visits down 40.9% 13. Cemetery Advisory Board has recruited 2 new members and now have a full panel of 7 community board members. Environmental Education 1. Five Discovery Programs week-long outdoor summer camps. 61 kids served 2. Hosted a total of 8 Discovery Interpretive Tables at Olympic Beach, City Park, and Mathay-Bal linger Park (first City program there). 3. Beach Rangers patrolled the waterfront everyday Memorial Day weekend through Labor Day weekend for a total of 99 days. 3 Packet Pg. 275 8.2.b Human Services Division 1. Supported Snohomish County's efforts to purchase an enhanced shelter in South County utilizing ARPA funding. Acquisition of America's Best Value Inn was accepted by County Council in August 2022. 2. Provided Social Services support at each Edmonds Community Court. 3. Accepted over 50 referrals and currently have 38 clients that are engaged, or outreach is in process; engaged individuals have presented with 40 identified needs and 26 of those needs have had a closed loop referral (need met). 4. Completed integration of contracted service provider (social worker) with Police to include call outs, ride-alongs, attendance in staff meetings and inclusion in staff emails. 5. Secured city vehicle to ensure social worker is identifiable during outreach and EPD callouts. 6. Established relationship with City Hall Neighborhood Office and began outreach from that location to individuals along the HWY 99 corridor. 7. Provided ongoing support for distribution of ARPA funding through Household Support Grant program. 8. Updated supply of items needed for the Urgent Needs Program to include non- perishable food and essential needs care items which are distributed by Edmonds Police Department, City Hall Neighborhood Office and Social Worker. 9. Coordinated with Council Legislative Aide on Suicide Awareness and Prevention website. 10. Coordinated with the Food Bank and Municipal Court to provide food to clients attending Community Court; procured refrigerator for perishable food. 11. Coordinated with Snohomish County to relocate 5 motel voucher recipients to different motels while America's Best Value Inn is being purchased. Youth Commission 1. Held a summer retreat at Hutt Park and pulled invasive plant species while getting to know each other and discussing potential projects for the upcoming year. 2. Recruited 13 applicants for the 8 Commission vacancies. 3. Held first two meetings of the year in -person with full attendance and excitement about no longer meeting via Zoom. 4 Packet Pg. 276 8.2.c Parks, Recreation, %-j "A %� ".L %.&ACi dt:i =21 ° A %, &-yroc and Human Services Department Overview/2022 Accomplishments 2023 Operating &Capital Budget Decision Packages Photo credit: Mike Rosen Angie Feser, Director November 7, 2022 Packet Pg. 277 8.2.c Parks. Recreation. L/1 / Culhiral Arts, and Human Services CU Angie Feser U Executive Assistant OPark Human Services Deputy Maintenance Program Manager Parks Director Un Manager (PT) Youth Park Cemetery peg ♦ Contractors Commission Coordinator Maintenance Sexton Maintenance •Volunteers (.25) Lead Worker Mechanic ,_ T Recreation L� ♦Senior Parks Supervisor Maintenance Worker (5} *Park T Maintenance ♦Recreation Coordinator Worker(4) (2 6) *Environmental Education & T Sustainability Field Arborist Coordinator ♦ Senior Office Specialist ♦ Seasonal •Program Staff Assistant ♦ Volunteers etive • *Interpretive cialist ♦ Contractors (S) T Lei Recreation Leader -Preschool ♦ PT Staff ♦Instructors • Seasonal Staff • Contractors c m E fC Q Department • Staff: 25 Full Time .N Arts &Cultural 3 Part Time � Services Program Manager LL 23 Hourly a Cultural Arts 14 Seasonal Program Specialist ,Contractors • Operating budget: $6,,5001000 M • Volunteers 7 • Capital budget: $11,,000,.000 • Divisions: 4 • Advisory Groups: 5 d w 14 a �r C G1 Svc�. 11114 E . s c� w Q Packet Pg. 278 8.2.c W L— Z3 O (A4) �i 4--) / �/ I W E 4-J n� W Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts, and Human Services Angie Feser Park Ma inte na nce Manager Cemetery Sexton Park park Mainte na nce Maintenance Mechanic Lead Worker ♦Senior Parks Main tena nce Worker (5) ♦Park Maintenance W orker (4) DP#26 Add Four Parks Maintenance Workers DP#28 Ad d Two Pa rks Maintenance Workers Field Arborist ♦ Seasonal Staff ♦ Volunteers ♦ Contractors Executive Assistant Deputy Parks Director Youth Recreation Commission Supervisor Coordinator (.25) ♦ Recreation Coordinator (2.6) ♦ Environmental Education & Susta inability Coordinator ♦ Senior Office S pecia list ♦Program Ass ista nt ♦ Interpretive Specia list (.5) ♦ Recreation Leader -Preschool ( 8) ♦ PTStaff ♦ Instructors ♦ Sea s onal Staff ♦ Contractors Human Services Program Manage ♦ Contractors ♦ Volunteers Department • Staff: 2-5 Full Time 3 Part Time Parks Pla n ner a nd Ca pital Project Manager 23 Hourly 14 Seasonal • Operating budget: $6,500,000 • Capital budget: $11,000,.000 • Divisions: 4 • Advisory Groups: -5 nr r.r�gr M y N L r N U R r a Packet Pg. 279 8.2.c c m E _ I Parks, Recreation. CnldrralArts.and Human Services Administration/Park Planning Q- o Angie Feser U s stair • Direction of o .D o department/divisions ' LParkto na nce Deputy Parks Director ParksPlannerandnager pital Project Manager Ica Q '�� • Planning and Capital projects Cemetery Park Park Mainte na nce Maintenance Recreation Youth Commission 1NA/ Sexton Mechanic Lead Worker Supervisor CoordinatorL 25 ( ) • Land Acquisition (` ♦Senior Parks i T1 Maintenance Worker (5) 7+Environmental Human Services Program Mana ger • Budget E *Park alParks, keveaS[an, and CulSursl S�rvlcrsMaintenance PARKSPRQ.IECi"5 y Coordinator ♦Contractors "••'° . N—���e Fq-U U d w v , ♦ Senior Office Specialist ♦Volunteers xn�°w•.cr •"°"`-'"� aI P #26 our Parks 7Mainten ♦ Program •. ".rY�.�r�-ur 4' Mp.v�HnnM (n 1 i ance Workers Assistant • "+^'�^^�-ut ��w• Y L r ♦ Interpretive °1 M Specialist w'pioeO "'' ...- .� _ c a Add Two Pa rks ♦ Recreation °.��..�,,�jnpl n, W Maintenance Workers Leader -Preschool c8) .��sw.,,.,a • O • ++ Field Arborist � ♦ PT Sta ff yu ♦ ♦ R' V% 4-) ♦Instructors ♦ Se asonal Sta ff "'�� d ♦Seasonal Staff Volunteers ♦Contractors ,°,��� .. ♦ ++ ♦ n . d ♦ Contractors +++ L • ' a'J W raffia r. ro M N N C d Packet Pg. 280 8.2.c Administration/Park Planning • 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan • Civic Center Playfield Project SA aON • 961h Ave Infiltration Project (Civic SW Mitigation) • Salmon Safe Certification • Park Planner/Project Manager hired S FE • Yost Bridge Assessments - Shell Creek Study Proposal • Parks Maintenance Operations Assessment completec • Started park asset inventory project (in-house) • Supporting Plan/Dev Services (Hwy 99 Revitalization, Green Streets, Public Spaces) (5) Packet Pg. 281 8.2.c Administration/Park Planning • Capital Projects • Brackett's Landing North Restroom repair/upgrade • Yost Pool Replaster completed • Greenhouse — variance, permit, JOC bid • 96t" Ave Infiltration • Concessionaire Agreements • Special Events Agreements • $2.9M Goffette Donation • Library Flood /Plaza Room support • Established system for remote Advisory Board Meetings • All Civic Park Memorial Benches/Tables sold ($66,000) c m E a a� 0 0 .N 0 a E a CO �,r_I rays OHO M :y C N i 'L = N Inc. I x90 E s c� w Q Packet Pg. 282 8.2.c Pre -Construction —August 2021 r c Q Packet Pg. 283 8.2.c October 06, 2022 0 Tki � m >! �i C Q Packet Pg. 284 8.2.c Park Ma inte na nce Manager Cemetery Sexton Park Park Maintena Maintenance Mechanic Lead Worker ♦Senior Parks Main tena nce Worker *Pa rk Maintenance W orker (4) DP#26 Add Four Parks Maintenance Workers DP#28 Add Two Pa rks Maintenance Workers Field Arborist ♦ Seasonal Staff ♦ Volunteers ♦ Contractors Parks, Recreation. Cultural Arts, and Human Services Angie Feser Executive Assistant Deputy Parks Director Youth Recreation Commission Supervisor Coordinator (.25) ♦ Recreation Coordinator (2.6) ♦ Environmental Education & Susta inability Coordinator ♦ Senior Office S pecia list ♦Program Ass ista nt ♦ Interpretive Specia list (.5) ♦ Recreation Leader -Preschool ( 8) ♦ PTStaff ♦ Instructors ♦ Sea s onal Staff ♦ Contractors Human Services Program Manage ♦ Contractors ♦ Volunteers Parks Pla n ner a nd Capital Project Manager �o c m E Parks Maintenance Division o • 14 FTE/8 Seasonals O • Routine maintenance L • All parks/facilities • Outdoor public spaces ` • City street landscapes and trees • Public Restrooms (5) .' • Small capital projects to Volunteer Droiects of rra.{�G M N O � _• r N �.� — E t) R r a Packet Pg. 285 8.2.c Parks Maintenance • Yost Pool — year round • Replaced Chlorine injector • Spray Pad at City Park • Bench Replacement (14)/Table refurbishment (4) • Hwy 99 Project • Tree Removals • 100 Hanging flower baskets • Cemetery burials • Seasonal staff shortage — 2X OT allocation to cover c m E a aD 0 0 N U- 0 a In L M a CO Q Packet Pg. 286 8.2.c Parks Maintenance • Yost and Seaview Parks • tennis/pickleball courts — pressure wash/new nets • Support Special Events • Uptown Market (6) • Summer Market, Arts Festival, 4t" of July, Taste Edmonds, Car Show, Safety Event, Oktoberfest • New art installation at 6t" & Bell • Hwy 99 project plant inspections • Bill Anderson Viewer installation/repair • Interurban Trail vegetation trimmed back • ADA Improvements (5 projects) r E c� w Q Packet Pg. 287 8.2.c Park Ma inte na nce Manager Cemetery Sexton Park park Mainte na Maintenance Mechanic Lead Worker ♦Senior Parks Main tena nce Worker *Pa rk Maintenance W orker (4) igil M DP#28 Add Two Pa rks Maintenance Workers Field Arborist ♦ Seasonal Staff ♦ Volunteers ♦ Contractors Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts, and Human Services Angie Feser Executive Assistant Deputy Parks Director Youth Recreation Commission Supervisor Coordinator (.25) ♦ Recreation dia Coorntor (2.6) ♦ Environmental Education & Susta inability Coordinator ♦ Senior Office S pecia list ♦Program Ass ista nt ♦ Interpretive Specia list (.5) ♦ Recreation Leader -Preschool ( 8) ♦ PTStaff ♦ Instructors ♦ Sea s onal Staff ♦ Contractors Recreation Division • Staff: 10+ • Frances Anderson Center o Parks Pla n ner a nd Capital Project Manager V to Waterfront Center (limited) z • Rentals — shelters, fields, facilit J. Human Services • Programs Program Manager ♦ Contractors • Direct/indirect ♦ Volunteers • Special events • Environmental Education 4 1 J r C t U R El Packet Pg. 288 8.2.c Recreation Programming • Reservations (NEW online registration) • 24% increase in shelter rentals • Brand & Strategy Update (ill NEW) • Digital CRAZE (program guide) New email communication system • Brand guide • Communication enhancement • Facebook • Print Material Notification for digital CRAZE (NEW) (13) I Shelter Rentals Athletic Fields (hrs) Gym Rental (hrs) Registerradayl 'r'EDMOlJOS :J .y 130 270 46 1,700 11550 560 3,810 wo U- 300 160 50 510 a *100 more than last year R a co Of E D 1f��0 N O C v N t r Q Packet Pg. 289 8.2.c Recreation Programming • 35% increase in participation/registration • Summer Camp — reinstated • 2nd-6t" grades, 10 weeks, 312 participants • SEEK Grant - $86,825 • 105 full scholarships awarded • Contracted Camps (24) • Programs • Gymnastics resumed in April • Fitness/Wellness classes (28) 11 NEV' programs KIDS Q S41 0 CAN MPS .. . o.rar.v sgmc�sx+.•s • hv�nw RVA77,�g�! r.r GYMNASUCS is ma Ar vir fRa as alveeRsely ee>y tv Z, Classes and Camps! Sign ap PeAay! m E a aD 0 0 N d LL 0 a a� E L a CO QQ EDP M N O � r C Inc. I x90 N s c� w Q Packet Pg. 290 8.2.c Recreation Programming • Adult Athletics/Leagues • Meadowdale Preschool • Events • Earth Day (April 23rd) • Watershed Fun Fair (May 14tn) • Health & Fitness Expo (May 21st) • Outdoor Movies (4) NEW locations • BirclFest (Sept 11th) (15) Softball* 164 11968 Basketball** 6 36 Pickleball 115 230 Pickleball Clinics 193 Volleyball** 21 168 Total Participants 2,595 *Summer League: 63 teams, increase by 30 teams **Resuming after 2 years due to CV Packet Pg. 291 8.2.c Recreation Programming • Environmental Education (16) • nvironment Resources Portal • K-6 Spring Marine Education (2,500 kids) • Discovery Camps (5) • Discovery Interpretive Tables • Olympic Beach, City Park • Mathay-Ballinger Park (NEW) • (3) Beach Ranger Naturalists patrolled beaches (Memorial — Labor Day) _ _ — v ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PORTAL �I Var[q wcroa[wnx[ui[ural5en•res M-y P�[. CONSERVATION AT HOME LEADERSHIP AND VOLVNTEERIN L we unai[nero P'arx[a�airr���r«��.r�, �,��. al n w[.a�nsrmoi[s[eos�ne�rea�ir e.ows.wruns.rvnlon.r Boma � we.. O I R•Inindar�s }• . neesarwwreure C smrm..ararma�nn.n[ d . • PoIW[ron INelen[lon • Wa[er and ener{y com[rvatian L . wa.mand—wain d . rrern a�s:nesxd �+ G cownlwYwwan![nloina~kPr[Yro•. y © Y O N O N N r y i 1 C d E .s c� w Q Packet Pg. 292 0 c .d Parks, creation, Galturalltural Arts. and Q n , W Human Services AngieFeser Arts & Cultural Services Divisior U Executive � Assistant • Through Sept. 1, 2022 OPark Arts Cultural �1 Maintenarx a program Human Servicesjarks Manager tor Services Program • Staff: 2ILL V / Manager (PT)Manager 0 ^1 a CemeteryMaintenance pad ♦Contractors on or Cultural Arts Public&Visual ArtPart Sexton Maintenance ♦Volunteers Program SpecialistPerforming Lead Worker Mechanic •♦5eniorParks Artsn or ( IVl Maintenance Worker ♦ Corrtractors ♦Volunteers E • Literary Arts = 4—j v ) ♦Park Maintenance Worker(4) ♦ Recreation Coordinator U� (2.6) *Environmental Education & • Community Cultural Plan �' 4—) L Field Ar6orist Sustainability Coordinator M a ♦ Senior office - 0 n , specialist O W ♦ Seasonal •Program Assistant } Staff ♦ Volunteers ♦ •Interpretiae Specialist — —' d ♦ Contractors (5) M —� t , ♦ Recreation Leader -Preschool :sa - ;ZNOW f1 — # 7 m T Staff tructors 114Cl N w , (V'./, :Sea_n.1 Staff r y '� Q n N rRradors G1 s c� w Q Packet Pg, 293 8.2.c Cultural Arts Division • Best Book Poster Program/Exhibit • On the Fence Exhibits • Summer Concerts (19) • Hickman Park (NEW location) • 4t" Avenue Cultural Corridor • Hwy 99 Gateway project design • Public Art projects • Floretum Club 100t" Anniversary • Civic Park Art • Write on the Sound (WOTS) Conference (Ity Park (oncerts I...25 EtlmonG�dYooaway NIpF $tlnN LOI�rrY lry ] =M"qW-ut ,17 Ay7 Stn1111tp&Mert�xwti 111ctka131n1 latW h� 2S m Po�kMmenls Hickman Park da c m E a aD 0 R kA a co Q Packet Pg. 294 8.2.c Parks, Recreation, Cultural Arts, and Human Services Angie Feser Park Ma into na nce Manager Cemetery Sexton Park Pa rk Ma inte na nce Maintenance Mechanic Lead Worker ♦Senior Parks Main tena nce Worker *Pa rk Maintenance W orker (4) igil M DP#28 Add Two Pa rks Maintenance Workers Field Arborist ♦ Seasonal Staff ♦ Volunteers ♦ Contractors Executive Assistant Deputy Parks Director Recreation Supervisor ♦ Recreation Coordinator (2.6) ♦ Environmental Education & Susta inability Coordinator ♦ Senior Office Specia list ♦Program Ass ista nt ♦ Interpretive Specia list (.5) ♦ Recreation Leader -Preschool ( 8) ♦ PTStaff ♦ Instructors ♦ Sea s onal Staff ♦ Contractors Human Services Division • Staff: 1 + 1 * Parks Planne rand I . Resource "Hub" Capital Project Manager :C�o: isio• Outreach and collaboration is)tor with Edmonds Police Dept. :PHr'-'E`an'D"a"a­g" • Urgent Needs Program ♦ Contractors ♦ Volunteers • Motel Vouchers • ARPA Distribution c E a r C E t U R El Packet Pg. 295 8.2.c Parks, Recreation and Human Services 2022 Accomplishments c m E a aD 0 Packet Pg. 296 8.2.c Human Services • Homelessness Task Force Recommendation • Homelessness Assessment Report • Compass Health Social Worker hired July 2022 • Dispatched/referrals from EPD • Participates in community court • Current client list of 45+ people • Unlawful Occupation Ordinance • Motel Acquisition Snohomish County • ARPA Funding • Reopening grant portal • Ordinance revisions c ■ d E a d G N U. FREEa d Services CD 2_1_I DO You KNOW... E • WHERE YOUR NEXT MEAL 15 COMING FROM? • WHERE YOU ARE GOING TO SLEEP TONIGHT? • WHERE TO GET SUPPORT? Dich vId m4r) PIN Y NEMOXAMOS PASLAUGOS L SERVICES GRATWtS; ® d 4 nds Human Services Hx 5ER.e[Ct o0.0G.RAY Yuawzu � � I �edmandswx.gw co N v o N C (1 Inc. 1 Jim E . s w Q Packet Pg. 297 8.2.c Human Services • Urgent Needs Program/Care Kits (50) • Provided FAC work space for South Snohomish Community Resource Advocate (1 day/week) • Maintained long-term motel vouchers (5) for Emergency Shelter • Program Manager increased to FT Is Coordinated services for 141 individuals in first three quarters of 2022. Often individuals present with multiple needs. c ■ d E a d G .y %( U. .r'J J9j'1A HOUSEHOLD �11ppg1ff r,,1r1Fffr 1 U) Grants up to $2,500 to Edmonds residents earning up E to 60% of median income = U For information and to apply, visit: https://www.edmondswa.gov/HHgrants NI � L Spread the word! a, C G1 E .s c� w Q Packet Pg. 298 8.2.c Parks, Recreation and Human Services 2023 Operating Budget Decision Packages (7) c m E a aD 0 Packet Pg. 299 8.2.c Yost Park / Shell Creek Study: $220,000 (DP #zs) • ARPA Funded • Existing Conditions Analysis • Critical Areas Report • Cultural Resources Analysis • Recommendations and Action Plan 0 LL 0 a a� L a CO cM rs� N 0 N Packet Pg. 300 8.2.c �o c m E , 1� I'• ' D• 1� � tv d G Salmon Safe Certification Implementation: $75,000 (DP #24) • ARPA Funded • Water Conservation Plan • Integrated Pest Management Plan CO Packet Pg. 301 8.2.c Park Maintenance Operating Increase: $154,141 (DP #25) • Increase in supplies (trash bags, dog waste bags, toilet paper & graffiti removal) • Increase in utilities through park system • Shift seasonal staff to Limited Term Employees (9-month) 5. .0011, Packet Pg. 302 8.2.c New Park Maintenance Services (HWY 99 &Civic): $1)076)025 (DP #26) • 2 % miles of highway median and landscape beds • Irrigation system • 129 Trees • 8,895 Shrubs/perennials, plus lawn One -Time Expenditures ($241,200) • (2) arrow trailers • Traffic Control Plan from WSDOT • Startup Supplies (safety signs, street cones, etc.) • Startup Small Equipment (hand power tools) • (2) Flatbed trucks Ongoing Expenditures ($450,425 + Fleet charge) • Irrigation • Equipment rental expenses • Operating Supplies • (4) new Park Maintenance Worker FTE • Training, uniforms and outfitting of necessary equipment for each employee Q Packet Pg. 303 8.2.c New Park Maintenance Services (HWY 99 &Civic): $1)076)025 (DP #26) 8-acre Downtown Legacy Park • 4 acres of grass lawn • 1.6 acres of landscape beds (trees (122) and shrubs/perennials (24,250) • 2.25 acres of hardscape (sidewalks, play surfaces, skate park, track and Petanque courts) • 8,000 sf inclusive playground • 5-room restroom • amenities such as picnic tables, benches, lighting, trash receptacles and irrigation One -Time Expenditures ($235,800) • John Deere Gator • Ballfield mower *The 2 new FTE's would be funded by shifting two existing FTEs into • Top Dresser the Goffette donation funding • Aerator • Small power tools and general equipment • Flatbed truck with dump function • Irrigation truck with storage body • (2) new Park Maintenance Worker FTEs* • Training, uniforms and equipment for each employee Oneoine Expenditures (S147.800 + annual Fleet chareel • Utility increase for irrigation, permanent restroom, lights, etc. • Equipment rental expense • Operating supplies Q Packet Pg. 304 8.2.c Gift Catalog Expenditure Authority: $0 (DP #27) SPENDING AUTHORITY • Increase: $45,000 to $120,000 • Bench & Picnic Table Replacement • Additional Memorial Gifts Packet Pg. 305 8.2.c Parks Beautification Program: $283,324 (DP #28) 0 LL 0 a a� • Goffette Donation N • Move (2) existing FTEs into fund E • Increase (2) Seasonals terms from 4 months to 9 =� months • Supplies, Vehicles, Small Equipment • $50,000 for Greenhouse a C 0 0 c m 0 m a r a� a� 0 CO t,r' r•. n y M ` rs� N 0 N Packet Pg. 306 8.2.c Cemetery Seasonal Labor: $10,000 (DP #29) • Fund 130 • Converting 5-month to 9-month position • Cost of benefits only WE Y_ f s- �-,�- 0 LL 0 a a� L a m t,r r•. nnr M rs� cV 0 c N Packet Pg. 307 8.2.c Parks, Recreation and Human Services 2023 Capital Budget Decision Packages (4) c m E a aD 0 Packet Pg. 308 8.2.c Citywide Park Improvements: $295,000 (DP #79) Fund 125 z1 Backlog of 50+ Projects Small Capital Projects and Deferred Maintenance Job Order Contracting Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 C 0 LL 0 a Y� PROS Plan G2 — Obj. 2.1, 2.3 G3 — Obj. 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 G4 — Obj. 4.1, 4.2, 4.4 G5 — Obj. 5.1, 5.3, 5.4 L� G6— Obj. 6.1,6.3,6.4,6.5,6.7.° G9 — Obj. 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.9 N Rec. —3.1,3.7 a Rec. — 6.2, 6.3, 6.4 m oti r•.n,y c� N Y O N r v c� w Q Packet Pg. 309 8.2.c SDUNVAtJHF=WlR Q # WXP DQ #hiUYlYHV Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements: $499,300 (DP #so) PO Funds 332 and 125 • Paved Loop Pathway • Shelter with Picnic Tables • Permanent Restroom • Estimated Cost: $499,300 r!. I j- 1/1I1 G2—Obj2.6 G3 — Obj 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8, 3.9 G9— Obi 9.1 Rec.— 3.1, 3.3, 3.5, 6.2, 6.4 C 0 N LL 0 a a� E x L a c 0 a CO N C d E s c� w Q Packet Pg. 310 8.2.c Yost Park Inclusive Playground: $257,500 (DP #81) Fund 125 • Playground is 27 years old • No current ADA access • Funding Source: REET Fund 125 �o C m E , �a m C 0 N LL 0 a aD E PROS Plan =, G1— Obj 1.1, 1.4 G3 — Obj 3.6, 3.8, 3.9 Y� L G4 — Obj. 4.4 ai G5 — Obj 5.4 0 G6 — Obj 6.5 G9 — Obj. 9.1 L Rec.— 3.1,3.4,3.10 a Rec. — 6.2 -� CO p [n M *part of annual inclusive upgrade program o N r C G1 ■"�. tsQ E s c� w Q Packet Pg. 311 Z-1 M14 i, h 0 f . SDUNVAMFUHDWIRQ#b fKXP DQ#=IFHV or �.' Wr ems t. 6-wi A Ri r r' PROSI I I .._�' x .�, a.�c Wes.' • li: -_r �. 8.2.c �o c m E ,0 CORRECTION: Recreation OperatingChanges: $o (DP #TBD) • Recreation program allocation changes Ix LL 0 a a� m Cn r- M E M • Utility increase for Yost Pool offset by increase U, in Pool revenue N Y R a m `�t,4 Cfsn�ri= N 0 c� N c m E s c� w Q Packet Pg. 313 8.2.c EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION &HUMAN SERVICES c m a aD 0 c 0 m o: u- 0 a aD m cn m or r•.nl r ccn 0 c N C G1 s c� w Q Packet Pg. 314 8.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 11/7/2022 Edmonds City Attorney Work Group Status Report Staff Lead: Councilmember Dave Teitzel Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History The current contract between Lighthouse Law Group (Lighthouse) and the City of Edmonds is in the final year of the three year term and expires on December 31, 2022. Presuming Council approves a 12- month contract with Lighthouse, to conclude December 31, 2023, Council must consider its options for future legal representation. On September 20, 2022, Council discussed this issue and the need to dedicate Council resources to assess the issues regarding continuing to contract with Lighthouse for one year to enable Council to have sufficient time to investigate the full range of options available to the city in obtaining city attorney services. That discussion resulted in the formation of the City Attorney Work Group (previously referenced as "task force," but will be entitled Work Group going forward to avoid confusion) to assist Council in completing its due diligence. The Council work group members working on this issue are Councilmembers Susan Paine, Will Chen and Dave Teitzel. Recommendation No action required. This will simply be a status report of the work completed to date by the City Attorney Work Group, with additional information to be shared at a later date as proposed contract extension details are drafted for Council review. Narrative On August 23, 2022, City Attorney Taraday presented the annual Edmonds City Attorney Annual Report to Council (Attachment A). In particular, the work group focused on pages 32 and 35 of the annual report, where Mr. Taraday reported the annual hours worked by Lighthouse on behalf of Edmonds in 2021 and the first six months of 2022 as well as the flat fee paid by Edmonds for that work during those two periods. From that data, Mr. Taraday calculated the average effective hourly rate paid by Edmonds as $185 in 2021 and $175 in 2022. As part of our due diligence, the work group obtained the detailed documentation of hours worked by Lighthouse for Edmonds over those periods to verify the reported hours are accurate (see Attachment B for 2021 data and Attachment C for 2022 data). Our investigation found the reported hours are correct, and verified the monthly fee amounts used in Mr. Taraday's calculations are also correct. On the basis of this verification, the work group has concluded Edmonds is paying a generally lower average hourly fee for city attorney services than standard attorney fees in the prevailing local market. The next steps to occur in early 2023, assuming the city's business relationship continues past the end of this year, includes gaining knowledge about the benefits of either maintaining a contracted city attorney or bringing this body of work in-house. There will also be a client survey regarding the work provided by Packet Pg. 315 8.3 Lighthouse. This work will be accomplished in 2023 as a precursor to a decision about whether to continue with a contracted attorney arrangement or to consider hiring an in-house city attorney. Further, questions were raised by Councilmembers and Edmonds citizens regarding the "flat fee" contract arrangement between Edmonds and Lighthouse. On September 20, 2022, Council authorized the expenditure of up to $1,000 for an independent legal review of the proposed Lighthouse 2023 contract extension. The Madrona Law Group was suggested by the WCIA General Counsel as an excellent and objective resource for such a review, and on September 27, 2022, Edmonds City Council entered into a contract with Madrona Law Group to conduct the review. The review was completed in October and the results of the review were provided to Council. While the Madrona review is an attorney -client privileged document, I can report the review found the proposed contract is legal. The reviewing attorney noted the need for several language updates to address contract clarity issues, and those suggestions will be incorporated into the draft 2023 contract that will be soon presented to Council for review. Attachments: A. 2022-08-23 City Attorney Annual Report for 202143634 B. 2021-- report of hours worked by matter —Redacted C. 2022 first half -- report of hours worked by matter42767_Redacted Packet Pg. 316 CITY ATTORNEY ANNUAL REPORT August 23, 2022 ' Lighthouse L L The City Attorney Team Jeff Taraday — 24 years ��Nmw N*W,, Z,-- L, • city council • Development Services • Mayor's Office • Engineering is Public Works • Litigation ■ Lighthouse LLwi�/-,I -_ The City Attorney Team Sharon Cates — 15 yrs - • Human Resources 3 • Engineering • Parks & Recreation • Public Works • Police • Community Services L I mow/-" -- _ The City Attorney Team Patricia Taraday — 13 yrs • City Clerk (PRA) • Police (PRA) • Mayor's Office • Development Services • City Council ■ �intnuse LLi�w- -. The City Attorney Team Angela Tinker — 6 years Engineering AT&T Wireless Public Works Ziply a � Packet Pg. 321 The City Attorney Team Beth Ford — 10 years Police Tupper OPMA Shippen Development Services Public Works Ebb Tide ■ Lighthouse LLwi�/-" -_ The City Attorney Team Tom Brubaker — 33 years City Council Public Works ■ �intnuse LLi�w- -. The City Attorney Team Mike Bradley • Comcast Renewal -a. ' Lighthouse L��-_ City Attorney Team Stats January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 • Lighthouse worked 3,367 hours for Edmonds in 2021 2021 Top 10 matters 10. Shippen v. City of Edmonds (112 hours) 9. Development Services (146 hours) 8. Public Works (152 hours) 7. Mayor's Office (167 hours) 6. City Clerk (171 hours) ' Lighthouse LMLc �rPacket Pg. 3 2021 Top 10 matters 5. AT&T — small cell (218 hours) 4. Human Resources (276 hours) I City Council (441 hours) 2. Police (454 hours) 1. Engineering (680 hours) M � LL� hthu City Attorney Team Stats January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 • Lighthouse worked 1,855 hours for Edmonds in first six months of 2022 - Lih#house L, 2022 Top 10 matters (so far) 10. Parks & Recreation (61 hours) 9. Mayor's Office (69 hours) 8. City Clerk (85 hours) 7. Police (108 hours) 6. Human Resource (120 hours) 2022 Top 10 matters (so far) 5. Development Services (180 hours) 4. Tupper OPMA (186 hours) 3. Public Works (242 hours) 2. City Council (304 hours) 1. Engineering (309 hours) ■ Lighthouse M w , Pending Litigation with Lighthouse • Edmonds v. Ebb Tide Declaratory judgment. Three partial summary judgment motions in the City's favor thus far: 1. City's Easement was ruled to be valid. 2. Easement height limit has also been established. 3. Construction of an improved walkway was contemplated by the parties. • October 2022 trial on remaining issue of whether easement allows an elevated walkway. • Tupper v. Edmonds OPMA penalty claim dismissed on summary judgment. Motion for reconsideration pending. ghthue cities Coverage Claims arising from alleged: • Employment related action, e.g. retaliation and harassment • Police excessive force • Land use damage • Auto liability • Defective street or sidewalk • Sewer obstruction • Premises liability • Other negligence ghthue 8.3.a r`- h 16 Ah L TL. D OL �lj Al = = I V r r Q h, ouse — Packet Pg. 333 Who is the client? RPC 1.1 3(a) A lawyer employed or retained by an organization represents the organization acting through its duly authorized constituents. Mdh HEPacket Pg. 334 The Attorney — Client Relationship Attorney Organizational Client Duly Authorized Constituents HEPacket Pg335 0 Duly Authorized Constituents? • Individual City Councilmembers Council • Boards & Commissions Judge Mayor - Directors • Staff HEPacket Pg. 336 What about your constituents, the citizens? City Council Mayor Citizens Judge ' Lighthouse �IL'� Why no direct interaction with citizens? RPC 1.6(a): A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation or the disclosure is permitted by paragraph (b). NEPacket Pg338 Why no direct interaction with citizens? RPC 1.6, comment [4]: Paragraph (a) prohibits a lawyer from revealing information relating to the representation of a client. This prohibition also applies to disclosures by a lawyer that do not in themselves reveal protected information but could reasonably lead to the discovery of such information by a third person. ' Lighthouse L L'� Why no direct interaction with citizens? RPC 1.6, comment [21]: The phrase "information relating to the representation" should be interpreted broadly. The "information" protected by this Rule includes, but is not necessarily limited to, confidences and secrets.... ' Lighthouse LLw� _ 8.3.a i lei g9D r U N C O E M N 7 C C El r a U M N O O N N O N Gl r Q Packet Pg. 341 So you aren't the client... are your communications still confidential? RPC 1.13, comment 2: When one of the constituents of an organizational client communicates with the organization's lawyer in that person's organizational capacity, the communication is protected by Rule 1.6. F m Lighthouse Packet Pg. 342 So you aren't the client... are your communications still confidential? ... This does not mean, however, that constituents of an organizational client are the clients of the lawyer. The lawyer may not disclose to such constituents information relating to the representation except for disclosures explicitly or impliedly authorized by the organizational client in order to carry out the representation or as otherwise permitted by Rule 1.6. HEPacket Pg. 343 Types of City Attorney Relationships • Elected • City Employee Appointed by Executive • Contract with Law Firm pursuant to City Council's Contracting Authority M � LL� ntn� Contract vs. In-house • Hiring / Firing Authority: does this matter? • Intellectual Capacity: 7 brains vs. brains • Cost: depends on... — Level of service chosen ( )under each scenario — Who bears budget risk � hthou Types of City Attorney Contracts • Flat Fee (status quo): all inclusive within predefined scope; the fee is both a ceiling and a floor — Availability and budget are highly predictable • Retainer: the fee is a floor, not a ceiling — Availability is predictable; budget is less predictable • Hourly: no floor or ceiling — Availability and budget are not predictable Packet Pg. 346 IL zo Budget Risk Flat Fee (current arrangement): Lighthouse assumes budget risk • Retainer: City assumes budget risk • Hourly: City assumes budget risk ` Lighthouse Lc �rPacket Pg. 347 City Attorney Team Stats January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 • Lighthouse worked 3,367 hours for Edmonds • Earned flat monthly fee of $51,878 ($622,536 annually) for all civil work including litigation • _ $185 average effective hourly rate Comparing $185 to the hourly rates � paid by other cities in 2021 • Maple Valley (Lighthouse): $243 - $324 • Issaquah (Ogden Murphy): $230 - $292 • Kenmore (Inslee Best): $247 - $267* • Mukilteo (Ogden Murphy): $227 - $267 (with most hours $227 - $247) • Lynnwood (Inslee Best): need to obtain rates *Rates resulted from 2019 competitive RFP process. 2021 rates shown here need to be confirmed. Lighthouse LcrPacket - • Amount saved in 2021 compared to these market rates • Average rate paid by Issaquah, Mukilteo, and Kenmore = approximately $250 / hour • $250 x 3,367 hours = $8415750 • $8411750 - $ 622)536 = Approximately $219,214 in savings M � LL� ntn� City Attorney Team Stats January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 • Lighthouse worked 1,855 hours for Edmonds • Earned flat monthly fee of $53,953 ($323,718 over first six months of 2022) for all civil work including litigation • _ $175 average effective hourly rate Comparing $175 to the hourly rates � paid by other cities in 2022 • Maple Valley (Lighthouse): $253 - $337 • Issaquah (Madrona): $250 - $310* • Kenmore (Inslee Best): need to obtain rates • Mukilteo (Ogden Murphy): $238 - $281 (mostly $238-$260) • Lynnwood (Kenyon Disend): $195-$370 (mostly $250 - $310)** *Rates result of 2021 competitive RFP process. **Rates result of 2021 competitive RFP process. Lighthouse L. Leiw Amount saved in first 6 months compared to these market rates • Average rate paid by Issaquah, Mukilteo, and Lynnwood = approximately $270 / hour • $270 x 1855 hours = $500,850 • $500)850 - $323)718 = Approximately $177,132 in savings M � LL� ntn� Questions? ■ Lighthouse L 1 LEW_ Matter Summary Date Start: 1/1/2021 1 Date End: 12/31/2021 1 Clients: City of Edmonds I Matters: Users: All Account Managers: All Rate/ Matter ID Date User Unit Price Labor Time/ Quantity Billable Time/ Cost Price 8.3.b 3 O Bill Amt/ Sell Price ,c L City of Edmonds O 2nd Amendment Foundation y C Total Labor For 2nd Amendment Foundation 5.90 5.90 O Total Expense For 2nd Amendment Foundation $0.00 r Q Total For 2nd Amendment Foundation $- U Appeal of FCC cable franchise order c Total Labor For Appeal of FCC cable franchise order 3.90 3.90 _ O E Total Expense For Appeal of FCC cable franchise order $0.00 W Total For Appeal of FCC cable franchise order y Architectural Design Board r v Total Labor For Architectural Design Board 3.00 3.00 d W Total Expense For Architectural Design Board $0.00 it Total For Architectural Design Board R E AT&T Wireless - New Cingular Wireless Total Labor For AT&T Wireless - New Cingular Wireless 221.30 218.00 L Total Expense For AT&T Wireless -New Cingular Wireless $0.00 - o � Total For AT&T Wireless -New Cingular Wireless L 3 O City Clerk 4- 0 Total Labor For City Clerk 170.70 170.70 r- O Total Expense For City Clerk $0.00 d L Total For City Clerk I City Council o N Total Labor For City Council 440.80 440.80 m Total Expense For City Council $0.00 c d E Total For City Council Comcast franchise renewal L) r r a Total Labor For Comcast franchise renewal 60.55 60.05 - Total Expense For Comcast franchise renewal $0.00 Packet Pg. 355 Total For Comcast franchise renewal 8.3.b Community Services & Economic Development Total Labor For Community Services & Economic Development 108.30 108.30 - Total Expense For Community Services & Economic Development $0.00 0 L Total For Community Services & Economic Development 0 v Compensation Commission Total Labor For Compensation Commission 1.90 1.90 >+ 0 Total Expense For Compensation Commission $0.00 0 Total For Compensation Commission .r Q Development Services U Total Labor For Development Services 147.50 145.70 Total Expense For Development Services $0.00 c 0 Total For Development Services W Diversity Commission d Total Labor For Diversity Commission 1.60 1.60 r R Total Expense For Diversity Commission $0.00 d Total For Diversity Commission I y r Ebb Tide CU E E Total Labor For Ebb Tide 34.70 34.70 -0 Total Expense For Ebb Tide $0.00 m Y L Total For Ebb Tide 0 Engineering L 3 Total Labor For Engineering 681.30 680.40 t Total Expense For Engineering $0.00 4- 0 Total For Engineering Q d L Finance & Administrative Services I Total Labor For Finance & Administrative Services 38.00 38.00 N 0 Total Expense For Finance & Administrative Services $0.00 N m Total For Finance & Administrative Services Fire district / RFA d E t Total Labor For Fire district / RFA 16.80 16.80 r Total Expense For Fire district / RFA $0.00 r Q Total For Fire district / RFA Packet Pg. 356 Human Resources Total Labor For Human Resources 276.00 276.00 Total Expense For Human Resources $0.00 - Total For Human Resources — Ken Reidy email and PRA p L Total Labor For Ken Reidy email and PRA 0.40 0.40 Y Total Expense For Ken Reidy email and PRA $0.00 L 0 Total For Ken Reidy email and PRA c Marchis property - Rob Michel 0, Total Labor For Marchis property - Rob Michel 0.50 0.50 r r Q Total Expense For Marchis property - Rob Michel $0.00 U Total For Marchis property - Rob Michel c Mayor's Office 0 E Total Labor For Mayor's Office 167.40 167.40 W Total Expense For Mayor's Office $0.00 d Total For Mayor's Office r Municipal Court — w I Total Labor For Municipal Court 1.40 1.40CU Total Expense For Municipal Court $0.00 E Total For Municipal Court Parks & Recreation d Y L Total Labor For Parks & Recreation 90.80 90.80 0 Total Expense For Parks & Recreation $0.00 3 Total For Parks & Recreation t Planning Board 4- O r- Total Labor For Planning Board 14.20 14.20 L Total Expense For Planning Board $0.00 I Total For Planning Board N 0 N Police m Total Labor For Police 454.50 454.50 d Total Expense For Police $0.00 E Total For Police t r r Q PSCAA asbestos appeal Total Labor For PSCAA asbestos appeal 12.40 12.40 Packet Pg. 357 Total Expense For PSCAA asbestos appeal $0.00 Total For PSCAA asbestos appeal 8.3.b PSNGP appeal Total Labor For PSNGP appeal Total Expense For PSNGP appeal Total For PSNGP appeal Public Records Total Labor For Public Records Total Expense For Public Records Total For Public Records Public Works (not Engineering, which is separately listed) Total Labor For Public Works (not Engineering, which is separately listed) Total Expense For Public Works (not Engineering, which is separately listed) Total For Public Works (not Engineering, which is separately listed) Ronald Wastewater Shippen v. City of Edmonds Tupper - hazard pay Tupper OPMA Verizon small cell 7.00 2.30 7.00 $0.00 2.30 $0.00 151.50 151.50 $0.00 Total Labor For Ronald Wastewater 4.10 4.10 Total Expense For Ronald Wastewater $0.00 Total For Ronald Wastewater Total Labor For Shippen v. City of Edmonds Total Expense For Shippen v. City of Edmonds Total For Shippen v. City of Edmonds Total Labor For Tupper - hazard pay Total Expense For Tupper - hazard pay Total For Tupper - hazard pay Total Labor For Tupper OPMA Total Expense For Tupper OPMA Total For Tupper OPMA Total Labor For Verizon small cell Total Expense For Verizon small cell Total For Verizon small cell 111.70 3.70 52.10 1.40 111.70 $0.00 3.70 $0.00 52.10 $0.00 1.40 $0.00 O E WCIA Supervision / Interaction I Packet Pg. 358 Ziply Total Labor For WCIA Supervision / Interaction Total Expense For WCIA Supervision / Interaction Total For WCIA Supervision / Interaction Total Labor For Ziply Total Expense For Ziply Total For Ziply Total Labor For City of Edmonds Total Expense For City of Edmonds Total For City of Edmonds Grand Total Labor Grand Total Expenses Grand Total 2.70 83.40 3373.75 3373.75 2.70 $0.00 82.70 $0.00 3366.55 $0.00 3366.55 $0.00 8.3.b r a Packet Pg. 359 8.3.c Matter Summary Date Start: 1/1/2022 1 Date End: 6/30/2022 1 Clients: City of Edmonds I Matters: I Users: All I Account Managers: All Rate/ Labor Time/ Billable Time/ Bill Amt/ w Matter ID Date User Unit Price Quantity Cost Price Sell Price U City of Edmonds O 2nd Amendment Foundation E Total Labor For 2nd Amendment Foundation 1.00 1.00 W Total Expense For 2nd Amendment Foundation $0.00 Total For 2nd Amendment Foundation r v Architectural Design Board a� I Total Labor For Architectural Design Board 4.20 4.20 ti to ti Total Expense For Architectural Design Board $0.00 N O Total For Architectural Design Board E AT&T Wireless - New Cingular Wireless Total Labor For AT&T Wireless - New Cingular Wireless 24.70 24.70 Total Expense For AT&T Wireless -New Cingular Wireless $0.00 Y 0 Total For AT&T Wireless - New Cingular Wireless N L Business Improvement District - Ed! O t Total Labor For Business Improvement District - Ed! 0.40 0.40 p Total Expense For Business Improvement District - Ed! $0.00 p Total For Business Improvement District - Ed! City Clerk '~ R Total Labor For City Clerk 84.90 84.90 +.. Total Expense For City Clerk $0.00 Total For City Clerk N c N City Council (j Total Labor For City Council 304.20 304.20 Total Expense For City Council $0.00 E Total For City Council R a Comcast franchise renewal Total Labor For Comcast franchise renewal 16.80 16.80 - Total Expense For Comcast franchise renewal $0.00 Packet Pg. 360 Total For Comcast franchise renewal Community Services & Economic Development Total Labor For Community Services & Economic Development Total Expense For Community Services & Economic Development Total For Community Services & Economic Development Development Services Diversity Commission Ebb Tide Engineering Total Labor For Development Services Total Expense For Development Services Total For Development Services Total Labor For Diversity Commission Total Expense For Diversity Commission Total For Diversity Commission 26.90 26.90 $0.00 179.80 179.80 $0.00 1.80 1.80 $0.00 Total Labor For Ebb Tide 14.20 14.20 Total Expense For Ebb Tide $0.00 Total For Ebb Tide Total Labor For Engineering Total Expense For Engineering Total For Engineering Finance & Administrative Services Total Labor For Finance & Administrative Services Total Expense For Finance & Administrative Services Total For Finance & Administrative Services Fire district / RFA Total Labor For Fire district / RFA Total Expense For Fire district / RFA Total For Fire district / RFA Human Resources Total Labor For Human Resources Total Expense For Human Resources Total For Human Resources Mayor's Office 309.10 32.20 0.10 119.80 309.10 $0.00 32.20 $0.00 0.10 $0.00 119.80 $0.00 8.3.c U N c - E LUW r v I ti _ N r d 0 O N L 3 0 t o L 0 sZ d L R N N 0 N U d R - a Packet Pg. 361 Total Labor For Mayor's Office 68.70 68.70 Total Expense For Mayor's Office $0.00 Total For Mayor's Office Municipal Court Total Labor For Municipal Court 0.60 0.60 Total Expense For Municipal Court $0.00 Total For Municipal Court Parks & Recreation Total Labor For Parks & Recreation 61.40 61.40 Total Expense For Parks & Recreation $0.00 Total For Parks & Recreation Planning Board Total Labor For Planning Board 3.20 3.20 Total Expense For Planning Board $0.00 Total For Planning Board Police Total Labor For Police 108.40 107.50 Total Expense For Police $0.00 Total For Police PSCAA asbestos appeal Total Labor For PSCAA asbestos appeal 8.20 8.20 Total Expense For PSCAA asbestos appeal $0.00 Total For PSCAA asbestos appeal PSNGP appeal Total Labor For PSNGP appeal 45.30 45.30 Total Expense For PSNGP appeal $0.00 Total For PSNGP appeal Public Records Total Labor For Public Records 2.00 2.00 Total Expense For Public Records $0.00 Total For Public Records Public Works (not Engineering, which is separately listed) Total Labor For Public Works (not Engineering, which is separately listed) 242.40 242.40 Total Expense For Public Works (not Engineering, which is separately listed) $0.00 8.3.c O r U O I ti co ti _ N m r d 0 O N L 3 O t 0 - O L I t - N N 0 N - U C d t O R _ a Packet Pg. 362 Total For Public Works (not Engineering, which is separately listed) Ronald Wastewater Total Labor For Ronald Wastewater Total Expense For Ronald Wastewater Total For Ronald Wastewater Shippen v. City of Edmonds Total Labor For Shippen v. City of Edmonds Total Expense For Shippen v. City of Edmonds Total For Shippen v. City of Edmonds Tupper OPMA 1.00 4.10 1.00 $0.00 4.10 $0.00 Total Labor For Tupper OPMA 186.20 186.20 Total Expense For Tupper OPMA $0.00 Total For Tupper OPMA WCIA Supervision / Interaction Total Labor For WCIA Supervision / Interaction 3.90 3.90 Total Expense For WCIA Supervision / Interaction $0.00 Total For WCIA Supervision / Interaction Total Labor For City of Edmonds 1855.50 1854.60 Total Expense For City of Edmonds $0.00 Total For City of Edmonds Grand Total Labor 1855.50 1854.60 Grand Total Expenses $0.00 Grand Total 8.3.c U N C E LUW d 0 O a Packet Pg. 363