2023-07-25 City Council PacketOp E D
o Agenda
Edmonds City Council
tnl. }nyo REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
J U LY 25, 2023, 7:00 PM
PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR
THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING
ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261
OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261
THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A
VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY
DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO
UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND
OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL
MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3. ROLL CALL
4. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE
AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO
THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE.
6. RECEIVED FOR FILING
Edmonds City Council Agenda
July 25, 2023
Page 1
1. Claim for Damages for filing (0 min)
2. Surplus Assets (0 min)
3. May 2023 Monthly Financial Report (0 min)
4. Written Public Comments (0 min)
5. Outside Boards and Committee Reports (0 min)
7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes July 18, 2023
2. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
3. Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
4. Approval of Minor Code Amendment Package #2 (AMD2023-0005)
5. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with Transpo for SR-104 Adaptive System from 236th St.
SW to 226th St. SW Project
6. Resolution Regarding 2024 Budget Priorities
7. Approval of ordinance amending Section 8.16.040 from Edmonds City Code (ECC), amending the
speed limit along Highway 99 from 244th St. SW to 210th St. SW.
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. 2023 July Budget Amendment Ordinance (30 min)
2. Resolution for Annexation into RFA (10 min)
3. Project Update: Tree Code Amendments (20 min)
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURN
Edmonds City Council Agenda
July 25, 2023
Page 2
6.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Claim for Damages for filing
Staff Lead: NA
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Marissa Cain
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages for filing.
Narrative
Bryan Gregory
76th Ave W
($701.28)
Attachments:
Claim for Damages - Gregory - for council
Packet Pg. 3
6.1.a
CITY OF EDMONDS
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM
Date Claim Form
Received by City
Please take note that R ru A it c a 4 who currently resides at
`I ailing address
home phone # 1 _ _ work phone # and who resided at Z
at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is ' __r, is claiming damages
against in the sum of $ C% . 2 arising out of the following circumstances listed below.
DATE OF OCCURRENCE: TIME: 1211,
LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: �I fo A-vt, ire)
DESCRIPTION:
1. Describe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage.
(attach an extra sheet for additional information, if needed)
2. Provide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers.
3_ Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair.
4_ Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company?
If so, please provide the name of the insurance company:
and the policy #:
License Plat(
Type Auto: '
DRIVER:
Address:
Phone#:
Passengers
Name:
Address:
Yes )<' No
* * ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AUTOMOBILE CLAIMS ONLY * *
E
V
Form Revised 04/09/2021
Page 1 of 2
Packet Pg. 4
6.1.a
This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the
attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a
court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature of Claimant Date and place (residential address, city and county)
Or
Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county)
Print Name of Representative
Bar Number (if applicable)
Please present the completed claim form to:
Form Revised 04/09/2021
City Clerk's Office
City of Edmonds
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA, 98020
8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
E
.2
v
E
V
a
rw
y.
Page 2 of 2
Packet Pg. 5
6.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Surplus Assets
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Dave Turley
Background/History
The city periodically disposes of surplus assets as part of its normal course of business. Council
notification is required; attached is a list of assets that were surplused in June.
Staff Recommendation
Notification only.
Narrative
Attachments:
Surplus_Parks_Murphy's Auction small equipment
Packet Pg. 6
Consignor Settlement v9_
6.2.a
James G. Murphy Co.
kLl i-A PO sox 1127
hiarywille, WA 98270
Toll Free - 1.800.426.3008
murphyauctionixom
Consignor: 9121
Jesse Curran
City Of Edmonds
700 Main Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone:425-789-8933
Auction: MARYSVILLE TOOLS & EQUIPMENT - ONLINE AUCTION
Lot# Lead
Date Transaction Description
CO #: 14754
Date: 6/29/2023
Page: 1
M�
PT
Amount
a
L
1135
KUBOTA RC60-72H
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
335.0(
5' PTO DRIVEN MOWER DECK ATTACHMENT
- _ -
1154
------------------------------------------------
HOWARD ROTAVATOR HA
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
- --- -
770. 0( E
4' 3 PT PTO DRIVEN ROTARY TILLER
Q-
ATTACHMENT
______- -_ a
--- -
1215
------
SEATTLE PUMP & EQUIPMENT CO
6/16/2023
_. _
Invoice Sale Price
220.0(
PORTABLE PRESSURE WASHER W113 HP
E
HONDA GX390 GAS ENGINE (NO HOSE OR
=
WAND)--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------1217
LANDA WATER JET
6/19/2023
Invoice Sale Price
260.0t
Q
WALK BEHIND PRESSURE WASHER
w
SURFACE CLEANER
�'
-------------------------------
1218
LITTLE WONDER 9008PI/C
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
976.01 3
WALK BEHIND BLOWER Wl8 HP BRIGGS &
I
STRATTON GAS ENGINE
- ------ -- ----- ------ --- L
1219
- -
MULTIQUIP MOD206N
- -
6/16/2023
----- -----
Invoice Sale Price
80.0' a
PORTABLE 2" DIAPHRAGM PUMP W/HONDA
3
GX120 GAS ENGINE
_ _ _ _ a
1562
GOODYEAR SOFTRAC
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
50.0
Cn
31 X13.5-15 MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TIRE
_ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _
1655
73"W IRON PARK BENCH 6/16/2023
_
Invoice Sale Price
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 85_ 0.0 _ _ _ �
_
1656
73"W IRON PARK BENCH
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
--------877.1
----------------------------
1657
7311W IRON PARK BENCH
611612023
Invoice Sale Price
-51 .-
------
1658
73"W IRON PARK BENCH
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
905.0
1659
73"W IRON PARK BENCH
6/20/2023
Invoice Sale Price
810.0
_ _ _
1660
_ _ _
73"W IRON PARK_ BEN_ CH
_
6/20/2023
Invoice Sale Price
- - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - _ - - - - - - - _710 i0
1691
BILLY GOAT
6/16/2023
_
Invoice Sale Price
275.0
WALK -BEHIND VACUUM W/BRIGGS &
STRATTON 6 HP GAS ENGINE
----.---_- _
1698
SMITHCO 3325
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
20.0
TOW BEHIND SPRAYER W/BRIGGS &
STRATTON3HPGASENGINE
-___---____--___-
---_-----
--------------------------------
1750
------------------
LOT, (2) HOFFMAN 1 X 3' X 5 ELECTRICAL
6/19/2023
Invoice Sale Price
80. C
ENCLOSURE CABINETS
_ _ _ - - _ _ - ..
_ _ _ - - - - -
2026
WILTON 3410
6I16I2023
Invoice Sale Price
535.00
7" X 12" HORIZONTAWERTICAL BANDSAW,
Packet Pg. 7
Consignor Settlement V9.
6.2.a
James G. Murphy CO.
PO BOX 1127
Marys--ille, WA 98270
Toll Free - I S00.426.3008
murphyauction.coin
Lot# Lead
SERIAL NUMBER: 05059379
Date Transaction Description
CO #: 14754
Date: 6/29/2023
Page: 2
Amount
----------- - - - ------ --- I-------------.
------------------ - - - - --
2132 PORTER CABLE 6/16/2023 Invoice Sale Price 80.00
6-GAL 150 PSI AIR COMPRESSOR, 120V
2357 KOMATSU REDMAX CHTZ2400 6/16/2023 Invoice Sale Price 60.0
GAS POWERED HEDGE TRIMMER y
2358 KOMATSU REDMAX CHTZ2300 6/16/2023 Invoice Sale Price 40.00
GAS POWERED HEDGE TRIMMER Q.
2359
_ _ _ _
MANTIS
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
6/16/2023
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _
Invoice Sale Price
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - . L
90.0C
GAS POWERED TILLER
------
2360
------------------------
MANTIS
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
---------------
90.0( m
GAS POWERED TILLER
c_.
--------------------
----------
2379
------------------------------------------------
LOT, ASSORTED CONTRACTORS TOOLS ON 6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
-7
40.0C a
THIS PALLET
2383
REDMAX EBZ7100
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
135.0(
GAS POWERED BACKPACK BLOWER
U)
2384
------------
REDMAX EBZ7100
-----
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
----------- c
135.0(
GAS POWERED BACKPACK BLOWER
-- -----
2385
REDMAX EBZ7100
-----------------
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
----- - --_
90.0(
GAS POWERED BACKPACK BLOWER
- - =
-----------
2386
--------------------------------
ECHO
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
- ----- - --- - CL
40.0(
GAS POWERED EDGER/TRIMMER
----------
ECHO
6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
50.0(
GAS POWERED ST_ R_ I_N_G TRIMMER
2388
ECHO 6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
GAS POWERED STRING TRIMMER
2389
------------
ECHO 6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
GAS POWERED STRING TRIMMER
------------
2390
-----------------------------------------
REDMAX CZ25N 6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
GAS POWERED STRING TRIMMER
2461
LOT, ASSORTED CONTRACTORS TOOLS ON 6/16/2023
Invoice Sale Price
THIS PALLET
-----------------
50.0(
----- 20.0(
-- - - - - ---- - --- - -
------------------
Total Quantity:
Total Invoice Sale Price:
Total Commission:
Total Due to Consignor:
Total Payments:
32.0
9,403.0
( 1,880.60
7,522.4
0.0
Balance: $7, 522.4
Positive Balance, Monies Owed to Consign(
No inventory remains for this consignment ord(
Packet Pg. 8
6.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/2S/2023
May 2023 Monthly Financial Report
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Sarah Mager
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Receive for Filing
Narrative
May 2023 Monthly Financial Report
Attachments:
May 2023 Monthly Financial Report
Packet Pg. 9
I 6.3.a I
OF
EDP
� d
1)7 C. 1 $9v
CITY OF EDMONDS
MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT
MAY 2023
Packet Pg. 10 1
I 6.3.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail
As of May 31, 2023
Years
Agency/ Investment Purchase to Par Market Maturity Coupon
Issuer Type Rice Maturity Value Value Date Rate
FHLB
Kent WA
First Financial - ECA
First Financial - Waterfront Center
FHLB
FHLB
FM
FNMA
FHLB
Spokane County WA
FHLMC
Farmer Mac
FHLB
US Treasury Note
Farmer Mac
Bonds
1,996,590
0.35
2,000,000
1,963,631
10/05/23
0.22%
Bonds
286,648
0.50
250,000
251,978
12/01/23
5.00%
CD
2,803,516
0.58
2,803,516
2,803,516
12/28/23
2.08%
CD
245,000
0.58
245,000
245,000
12/28/23
1.49%
Bonds
2,004,464
0.63
2,000,000
1,993,829
01/16/24
4.81%
Bonds
954,866
0.86
1,000,000
956,184
04/10/24
0.35%
Bonds
996,082
1.05
1,000,000
975,285
06/17/24
2.80%
Bonds
992,693
1.09
1,000,000
965,089
07/02/24
1.75%
Bonds
950,774
1.47
1,000,000
940,406
11/18/24
0.90%
Bonds
207,260
1.51
200,000
191,252
12/01/24
2.10%
Bonds
974,798
1.79
1,000,000
979,782
03/13/25
3.75%
Bonds
1,995,088
1.88
2,000,000
1,982,954
04/17/25
4.25%
Bonds
969,524
2.16
1,000,000
977,376
07/28/25
3.60%
Note
964,597
2.21
1,000,000
973,164
08/15/25
3.13%
Bonds
1,994,172
2.68
2,000,000
1,976,320
02/02/26
3.95%
TOTAL SECURITIES
18,336,072
1.29
18,498,516
18,175,765
Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool
Snohomish County Local Gov't Investment Pool
TOTAL PORTFOLIO
Kent WA, Issuer Diversification
1%
FHLMC, 5%_
First
Financial Spokane
Farmer CD, 16% County
Mac, 22% WA, 1%
FHLB, 38%
20,377,628 20,377,628 Demand 5.16%
33,498,794 33,498,794 Demand 2.77%
$ 72,374,938 $ 72,052,187
Cash and Investment Balances Checking,
(in $ Millions)
$5.91, 8%
Note,
Bonds,
$1.00, 1%
$14.45,
CD's,
18% State LGIP,
$3.05,
$20.38
4%
26% 10
County
LGIP,
$33.50,
1
Packet Pg. 11
I 6.3.a I
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
Annual Interest Income
$1,400, 000
$1,200,000 $1 236 875
$947,931 $950,684 1 091 709
$1,000,000 $882 556
$800,000
$600,000
$4
$400,000
$200,000 [it
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 YTD 2023
2
Packet Pg. 12
I 6.3.a I
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Rolling 24 months)
General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenses
10,000,000 —
9,000,000
8,000,000 • H
7,000, 000 •� • •
6,000,000 • • • Ip
• ��
5,000, 000 • _ /` • y` •
4,000,0003,000,000
•
,000, 000 1,000,000
—
—
June September December March June
September December March
General Fund Tax Revenue (2017 through 2022
Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000 - —
6,000, 000
4,000, 000
2,000, 000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
General Fund Tax Revenue (2023 YTD)
7,000,000
6,000, 000 $ 5,742,964
5,000,000 Aw
4,000,000 53,814,729
3,000, 000
$2,303,424
2,000,000
1,000, 000
Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes
Q
3
Packet Pg. 13
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund
2023
General Fund
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 2,761,312
$ 2,761,312
$ 2,320,252
-15.97%
February
5,473,311
2,711,999
4,920,100
-10.11%
March
8,241,198
2,767,887
8,150,445
-1.10%
April
11,660,900
3,419,702
16,689,365
43.12%
May
21,798,797
10,137,897
21,615,550
-0.84%
June
24,756,969
2,958,172
July
27,636,403
2,879,434
August
30,928,872
3,292,469
September
33,641,482
2,712,609
October
38,105,910
4,464,428
November
48,001,239
9,895,330
December
51,186,745
3,185,506
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax
2023
Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 342,055
$ 342,055
$ 151,084
-55.83%
February
560,818
218,763
270,799
-51.71%
March
909,543
348,725
521,829
-42.63%
April
1,192,058
282,515
745,931
-37.42%
May
1,541,969
349,911
1,053,507
-31.68%
June
1,918,974
377,006
July
2,301,683
382,709
August
2,708,930
407,246
September
3,135,518
426,588
October
3,524,452
388,935
November
3,913,570
389,117
December
4,400,000
486,430
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
w
Packet Pg. 14 1
SALES TAX SUMMARY
I 6.3.a I
Construction Trade,
$716,461
Accommodation, _
$15,509
Clothing and
Accessories, $147,770
Communications,
$104,659
Wholesale Trade, —
$133,236
Sales Tax Analysis By Category
Current Period: May 2023
Year -to -Date
Total $4,607,308
Automotive Repair, Amusement &
$99,882 Recreation, $37,618
Health & Personal
Care, $35,752 Business Services,
$494,353 Gasoline, $0
Retail Food Stores,
NNEP—bMI$154,861
Retail Automotive,
$1,110,10
Misc Retail, $879,201 _
12,000,000
10,000,000
$7,395,114 $8,406,296
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000 A.T
0
Others, $106,892 Eating & Drinking,
$523,164
Annual Sales Tax Revenue
$10,302,518
715 $8,317,046
2017 2018 2019
Manufacturing, $47,842
27
$4,607,308
2020 2021 2022 YTD 2023
5
I Packet Pg. 15
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax
2023
Sales and Use Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
911,577 $
911,577
$ 879,231
-3.55%
February
1,999,408
1,087,831
1,908,832
-4.53%
March
2,854,859
855,451
2,781,110
-2.58%
April
3,643,225
788,366
3,621,184
-0.60%
May
4,624,484
981,259
4,607,308
-0.37%
June
5,567,972
943,488
July
6,580,085
1,012,114
August
7,669,335
1,089,249
September
8,683,583
1,014,248
October
9,768,647
1,085,064
November
10,864,900
1,096,253
December
11,900,000
1,035,100
Sales and Use Tax
12,000,000
11,000, 000
10,000,000
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000 40
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
—0-- Current Year Budget — —Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Personal/Property Tax
2023
Real Personal/Property Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
49,915 $
49,915
$ 26,466
-46.98%
February
78,108
28,192
147,332
88.63%
March
375,054
296,947
824,405
119.81%
April
912,236
537,182
4,885,632
435.57%
May
5,909,096
4,996,860
5,742,964
-2.81%
June
6,029,957
120,861
July
6,148,773
118,816
August
6,198,768
49,995
September
6,260,415
61,647
October
6,466,132
205,717
November
11,227,156
4,761,024
December
11,327,000
99,844
Real PersonaMoperty Tax
12,000,000
11,000, 000
10,000,000
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
�Cunrent Yeaz Budget Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
6
Packet Pg. 16
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Water Utility Tax
2023
Water Utility Tax
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
86,205 $
86,205
86,092
-0.13%
February
146,468
60,263
143,978
-1.70%
March
232,107
85,639
221,845
-4.42%
April
288,835
56,728
279,282
-3.31%
May
373,578
84,744
363,282
-2.76%
June
439,121
65,542
July
541,031
101,910
August
629,368
88,337
September
748,356
118,987
October
835,253
86,898
November
933,046
97,793
December
993,712
60,666
Sewer Utility Tax
Water Utility Tax
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--*-- Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Sewer Utility Tax
2023
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
95,852 $
95,852
$ 89,935
-6.17%
February
174,661
78,808
166,439
-4.71%
March
269,654
94,993
256,368
-4.93%
April
348,626
78,972
333,172
-4.43%
May
444,771
96,145
424,703
-4.51%
June
523,850
79,080
July
620,193
96,343
August
699,682
79,489
September
799,189
99,507
October
879,620
80,432
November
976,901
97,281
December
1,055,821
78,920
Sewer Utility Tax
1,zuu,uuV
1,100,000
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*-- Current Yeaz Budget -mb-- Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
7
Packet Pg. 17
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales
2023
Meter Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 898,592
$ 898,592
$ 860,924
-4.19%
February
1,526,893
628,301
1,439,675
-5.71%
March
2,419,579
892,685
2,218,275
-8.32%
April
3,010,919
591,341
2,792,540
-7.25%
May
3,894,276
883,356
3,632,474
-6.72%
June
4,577,455
683,180
July
5,644,291
1,066,835
August
6,565,058
920,767
September
7,805,695
1,240,637
October
8,711,524
905,829
November
9,730,927
1,019,403
December
10,363,937
633,010
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales
2023
Storm Water Sales
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 484,003 $
484,003
$ 417,703
-13.70%
February
1,535,452
1,051,449
1,359,827
-11.44%
March
2,020,122
484,671
1,794,224
-11.18%
April
2,451,545
431,422
2,181,313
-11.02%
May
2,936,868
485,323
2,616,433
-10.91%
June
3,368,111
431,243
July
3,844,019
475,908
August
4,895,662
1,051,643
September
5,380,996
485,335
October
5,812,621
431,625
November
6,298,011
485,390
December
6,714,303
416,292
Storm Water Sales
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
Packet Pg. 18
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter SewerSales
2023
Unmeter Sewer Sales
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
958,430 $
958,430
$ 900,021
-6.09%
February
1,745,646
787,217
1,665,119
-4.61%
March
2,695,497
949,850
2,565,291
-4.83%
April
3,484,346
788,849
3,333,389
-4.33%
May
4,445,696
961,351
4,249,590
-4.41%
June
5,235,623
789,927
July
6,198,081
962,458
August
6,992,099
794,018
September
7,987,044
994,945
October
8,790,485
803,441
November
9,763,192
972,707
December
10,551,011
787,819
Unmeter Sewer Sales
l l ,uuu,uuu
10,000,000
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000 /
1,000,000/
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Yeaz Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
9
Packet Pg. 19
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund
2023
General blind
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January
$ 5,927,706 $
5,927,706
$ 4,868,760-17.86%
February
10,685,790
4,758,084
10,063,682 -5.82%
March
15,376,562
4,690,772
14,793,075 -3.79%
April
19,879,278
4,502,716
18,985,494 -4.50%
May
24,735,536
4,856,258
23,497,459 -5.01%
June
30,336,520
5,600,984
July
35,118,165
4,781,645
August
39,722,275
4,604,110
September
44,842,950
5,120,675
October
49,923,345
5,080,396
November
55,595,470
5,672,124
December
61,780,797
6,185,327
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental
2023
Non -Departmental
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
2,285,040 $
2,285,040
$ 1,642,894
-28.10%
February
3,483,056
1,198,016
3,380,586
-2.94%
March
4,581,985
1,098,930
4,986,307
8.82%
April
5,531,435
949,450
6,091,521
10.13%
May
6,720,936
1,189,500
7,245,913
7.81%
June
8,483,040
1,762,104
July
9,529,850
1,046,810
August
10,426,806
896,956
September
11,638,078
1,211,272
October
12,757,540
1,119,461
November
14,139,943
1,382,404
December
15,627,335
1,487,392
Non -Departmental
16,000,000
14,000,000
12,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
2,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget � Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
O
N
t4
.0
C
t4
C
LL
t
a+
C
O
M
M
N
O
N
ca
O
rL
m
U
C
c
LL
t
C
O
M
N
O
N
C
N
t
V
fC
a+
Q
10
Packet Pg. 20
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council
2023
City Council
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
31,557 $
31,557 $
33,649
6.63%
February
65,534
33,977
71,252
8.72%
March
104,052
38,517
108,460
4.24%
April
140,886
36,835
142,437
1.10%
May
187,929
47,042
180,396
-4.01%
June
237,649
49,721
July
274,904
37,254
August
325,684
50,780
September
364,850
39,166
October
398,315
33,465
November
440,363
42,047
December
486,256
45,893
Office of Mayor
City Council
500,000
450,000
400,000
350,000
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--0--Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor
2023
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 41,315 $
41,315
$ 32,343
-21.72%
February
84,527
43,212
63,133
-25.31%
March
126,265
41,738
101,671
-19.48%
April
168,834
42,569
133,210
-21.10%
May
210,482
41,647
164,114
-22.03%
June
251,630
41,148
July
293,597
41,967
August
335,203
41,606
September
377,026
41,823
October
417,998
40,972
November
461,344
43,346
December
504,873
43,529
Office of Mayor
550,000
500,000
450,000
400,000
350,000
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-"-Current Year Budget �PriorYear
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
11
Packet Pg. 21
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources
2023
Human Resources
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
115,623 $
115,623
$ 93,116
-19.47%
February
219,704
104,081
164,590
-25.09%
March
315,079
95,373
230,737
-26.77%
April
415,556
100,479
296,057
-28.76%
May
515,736
100,180
367,942
-28.66%
June
651,433
135,696
July
740,790
89,357
August
838,595
97,805
September
943,572
104,976
October
1,041,965
98,394
November
1,155,844
113,879
December
1,296,947
141,103
Human Resources
1,SUu,uuu
1,200,000
1,100,000
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
+Current Year Budget Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court
2023
Municipal Court
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
166,316 $
166,316
$ 114,975
-30.87%
February
334,870
168,554
231,321
-30.92%
March
508,443
173,573
352,625
-30.65%
April
684,089
175,646
476,351
-30.37%
May
872,479
188,390
611,186
-29.95%
June
1,045,638
173,160
July
1,222,956
177,318
August
1,420,871
197,915
September
1,602,183
181,311
October
1,790,590
188,407
November
2,016,553
225,963
December
2,240,163
223,610
2,400,000
Municipal Court
2,200,000
2,000,000
1,800,000
1,600,000
1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget �Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
12
Packet Pg. 22
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development
2023
Community Services/Economic Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
82,547 $
82,547
$ 84,200
2.00%
February
173,284
90,737
172,586
-0.40%
March
266,584
93,300
263,059
-1.32%
April
355,832
89,248
362,832
1.97%
May
448,151
92,318
470,437
4.97%
June
542,079
93,928
July
640,333
98,254
August
757,348
117,015
September
866,737
109,390
October
980,673
113,936
November
1,126,880
146,206
December
1,309,051
182,171
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
13
Packet Pg. 23
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report - Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund
2023
Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
217,095 $
217,095
$ 355,645
63.82%
February
359,768
142,674
530,347
47.41%
March
555,080
195,311
683,467
23.13%
April
632,977
77,897
798,011
26.07%
May
744,000
111,023
888,529
19.43%
June
870,622
126,623
July
964,912
94,290
August
1,105,547
140,635
September
1,246,510
140,964
October
1,404,743
158,232
November
1,508,608
103,865
December
1,753,427
244,819
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Administrative Services
2023
Administrative Services
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
January
$ 265,328 $
265,328
$ 253,437
-4.48%
February
451,089
185,762
571,249
26.64%
March
637,562
186,473
774,413
21.46%
April
828,444
190,882
964,313
16.40%
May
1,018,215
189,771
1,154,564
13.39%
June
1,276,857
258,642
July
1,491,726
214,869
August
1,682,764
191,039
September
1,874,849
192,085
October
2,075,444
200,595
November
2,300,685
225,240
December
2,497,266
196,581
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
14
Packet Pg. 24
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney
2023
City Attorney
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
96,815 $
96,815
$ 24,570
-74.62%
February
193,630
96,815
109,813
-43.29%
March
290,445
96,815
186,270
-35.87%
April
387,260
96,815
276,332
-28.64%
May
484,075
96,815
349,828
-27.73%
June
580,890
96,815
July
677,705
96,815
August
774,520
96,815
September
871,335
96,815
October
968,150
96,815
November
1,064,965
96,815
December
1,161,780
96,815
Police
City Attorney
1,200,000
1,100,000
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
--0-- Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Police
2023
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
1,164,139 $
1,164,139
$ 1,041,369
-10.55%
February
2,327,027
1,162,888
2,119,852
-8.90%
March
3,542,656
1,215,629
3,173,554
-10.42%
April
4,715,234
1,172,578
4,326,784
-8.24%
May
5,930,366
1,215,132
5,521,298
-6.90%
June
7,213,453
1,283,086
July
8,432,845
1,219,393
August
9,581,468
1,148,623
September
10,790,812
1,209,344
October
12,043,702
1,252,889
November
13,512,852
1,469,150
December
14,993,027
1,480,175
Police
15,000,000
14,000,000
13,000,000
12,000,000
11,000,000
10,000,000
9,000,000
8,000,000
7,000,000
6,000,000
5,000,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
� Current Year Budget �Prior Year
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
15
Packet Pg. 25
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Development Services
2023
Planning & Development
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals %
January $
395,975 $
395,975
$ 286,492
-27.65%
February
813,013
417,038
595,086
-26.80%
March
1,213,509
400,496
913,919
-24.69%
April
1,635,884
422,375
1,265,403
-22.65%
May
2,051,113
415,229
1,622,646
-20.89%
June
2,463,993
412,881
July
2,914,697
450,704
August
3,337,656
422,959
September
3,778,605
440,949
October
4,217,116
438,512
November
4,689,600
472,483
December
5,236,088
546,488
Parks & Recreation
Planning & Development
5,500,000
5,000,000
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-*--Current Year Budget � Prior Year
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation
2023
Cumulative Monthly
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast
YTD
Actuals
Variance
%
January
$ 457,812 $
457,812
$ 589,720
28.81%
February
958,458
500,646
958,125
-0.03%
March
1,459,194
500,736
1,386,849
-4.96%
April
1,960,748
501,554
1,788,118
-8.80%
May
2,473,516
512,768
2,229,794
-9.85%
June
3,017,740
544,223
July
3,613,117
595,377
August
4,229,777
616,661
September
4,893,730
663,953
October
5,439,139
545,409
November
5,995,908
556,769
December
6,573,617
577,709
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
16
Packet Pg. 26
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report - Fund 016 - Building Maintenance Fund
2023
Fund 016 - Building Maintenance Fund
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
106,250 $
106,250
$ 81,158
-23.62%
February
212,500
106,250
97,897
-53.93%
March
318,750
106,250
100,936
-68.33%
April
425,000
106,250
116,404
-72.61%
May
531,250
106,250
35,246
-93.37%
June
637,500
106,250
July
743,750
106,250
August
850,000
106,250
September
956,250
106,250
October
1,062,500
106,250
November
1,168,750
106,250
December
1,275,000
106,250
Fund 016-Building Maintenance Fund
1,300,000
1,200, 000
I , 100, 000
1,000,000
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Current Year Budget Prior Year
City ofEdmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance
2023
Facilities Maintenance
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
288,350 $
288,350
$ 335,018
16.18%
February
659,070
370,720
935,298
41.91%
March
1,043,814
384,744
1,264,752
21.17%
April
1,410,640
366,825
1,451,697
2.91%
May
1,744,249
333,609
1,803,967
3.42%
June
2,018,822
274,573
July
2,352,264
333,442
August
2,785,180
432,916
September
3,285,870
500,689
October
3,843,053
557,183
November
4,302,471
459,418
December
5,031,410
728,939
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
17
Packet Pg. 27
I 6.3.a I
City of Edmonds, WA
Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering
2023
Engineering
Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance
Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals
January $
282,359 $
282,359
$ 261,418
-7.42%
February
565,864
283,505
531,670
-6.04%
March
854,328
288,463
807,168
-5.52%
April
1,146,492
292,164
1,076,687
-6.09%
May
1,466,062
319,570
1,353,969
-7.65%
June
1,761,147
295,085
July
2,068,691
307,544
August
2,369,679
300,989
September
2,661,264
291,584
October
2,957,705
296,441
November
3,281,224
323,519
December
3,605,639
324,415
O
N
U
C
R
C
LL
t
a+
C
O
M
M
N
O
N
O
d
R
U
C
C
LL
t
C
O
2
CO)
N
O
N
f�
C
N
E
t
V
M
a+
Q
*The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average.
18
Packet Pg. 28
6.3.a
Page 1 of 1
C TTY OF EDMONDS
REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2023 Amended
5/31/2022
5/31/2023
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Revenues
Revenues
Remaining
%Received
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 51,186,745
$ 19,290,212
$ 21,615,550
$ 29,571,195
420/c
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
225,000
-
-
225,000
00/c
Ol l
RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND
-
-
00/c
012
CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND
447,522
447,522
00/c
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
-
-
-
-
00/c
016
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND
17,480
14,021
42,338
(24,858)
2420/c
017
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
-
-
-
-
00/c
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
-
-
-
-
00/c O
N
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
167,650
729
902
166,748
1 %
Ill
STREET FUND
1,815,410
549,412
547,463
1,267,947
300/c
V
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
12,366,800
1,244,306
3,378,473
8,988,327
27%
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
98,098
84,277
14,689
83,409
1501( LL
118
MEMORIAL STREET TREE
-
-
-
-
00/,
s
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
84,400
35,174
38,191
46,209
450/, _
O
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
38,960
11,669
12,655
26,305
32%
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
1,660
139
91
1,569
50/c N
O
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
30,440
12,422
13,221
17,219
430/c N
A
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
2,320,090
690,422
545,435
1,774,655
240/c
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
2,302,980
684,501
551,619
1,751,361
24% v
127
GIFT S CATALOG FUND
135,340
74,921
53,500
81,840
400/c O
C.
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
150,960
84,910
75,861
75,099
5001,
136
PARKSTRUST FUND
5,460
1,632
(7,497)
12,957
-137% �p
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD
51,500
19,896
14,905
36,595
290/c .O
C
O
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
10,430
150
117
10,313
1%
IL
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
88,645
54,618
53,037
35,608
600/c
141
AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSINGFUND
65,000
24,287
21,312
43,688
330/c r
C
142
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
1,669,000
-
668,774
1,000,226
400/,
143
TREE FUND
215,100
198
1,355
213,745
10/c M
N
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
309,800
30,871
28,458
281,343
9% N
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
2,713,902
810,944
522,921
2,190,981
19%
411
COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION
-
70,785
57,265
(57,265)
0%
w
421
WAT ER UT ILIT Y FUND
11,950,114
4,103,567
4,207,711
7,742,403
350/,
422
STORM UTILITY FUND
9,020,452
2,871,175
3,309,321
5,711,131
37% t
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
15,898,844
7,948,007
8,526,944
7,371,900
540/c v
O
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,991,860
1,115
6,694
1,985,166
r
w
00/c Q
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
4,188,740
761,804
1,090,665
3,098,075
260/c
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,481,194
483,440
662,656
818,538
450/c
$ 121,049,576
$ 39,959,604
$ 46,054,626
$ 74,994,950
380%
19
Packet Pg. 29
I 6.3.a I
Page 1 of 1
C PIY OF EDMONDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY
Fund
2023 Amended
5/31/2022
5/31/2023
Amount
No.
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 61,780,797
$ 19,128,482
$ 23,497,459
$ 38,283,338
380
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
367,140
126,014
154,761
212,379
420
O11
RISK MANANGEMENT RESERVE FUND
25,000
-
-
25,000
0%
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
5,900
-
-
5,900
0%
016
BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND
1,275,000
17,074
35,246
1,239,754
30/c
017
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
-
-
-
-
0%
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
-
-
-
00
019
EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND
-
-
-
0% 0
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
45,800
-
-
45,800
N
00/c tY
111
STREET FUND
2,583,414
934,609
1,337,791
1,245,623
520/,
t)
112
COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE
11,273,695
605,359
2,170,132
9,103,563
19%
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
207,380
16,940
34,885
172,495
170/c LL
118
MEMORIAL STREET TREE
-
-
-
-
00/c
s
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
95,400
19,714
3,934
91,466
40/, _
O
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
26,880
-
-
26,880
0%
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
3,000
-
-
3,000
0% N
O
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
28,500
533
5,222
23,278
180/, N
A
125
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2
4,315,418
643,105
816,074
3,499,344
19%
126
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1
1,800,512
134,700
130,013
1,670,499
71/c
127
GIFTS CATALOG FUND
497,598
4,334
97,011
400,587
19% 0
0.
130
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT
249,413
78,494
107,230
142,183
430/,
136
PARKS TRUST FUND
43,842
2,540
-
43,842
00/, <0
137
CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND
50,000
-
-
50,000
00/, C
O
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
11,900
70
415
11,485
30/,
LL
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
88,575
20,878
20,890
67,685
240/, >,
142
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
1,669,000
380,776
673,314
995,686
400/c
143
TREE FUND
239,800
-
-
239,800
00/c
231
2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND
309,800
-
-
309,800
00/c N
332
PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND
2,255,647
2,323,141
974,759
1,280,888
430/c N
421
WATER UTILITY FUND
11,819,111
2,358,873
2,988,333
8,830,778
250/c CC
422
STORM UTILITY FUND
8,292,377
1,741,370
2,044,743
6,247,634
250/c
423
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
16,488,945
6,399,786
5,979,189
10,509,756
360/, N
t
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,989,820
-
-
1,989,820
0%
t�
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
4,431,858
514,481
1,042,885
3,388,973
240/, ;C
w
Q
512
TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND
1,753,427
603,046
888,529
864,898
510/c
$ 134,024,949 $ 36,054,321 $ 439002,814 $ 91,0229135 320%
20
Packet Pg. 30
Page 1 of 3
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2023 Amended 5/31/2022 5/31/2023 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
TAXES:
1 REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX
2 EMSPROPERTY TAX
3 VOTED PROPERTY TAX
4 LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 1
5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX
6 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST
7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX
8 GASUTILITY TAX
9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX
10 WATERUTILITY TAX
11 SEWERUTILITYTAX
12 STORMWATERUTILITY TAX
13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX
14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX
15 PULLTABSTAX
16 AMUSEMENT GAMES
17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX
LIC INS ES AND PERMITS:
18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE
19 POLICE - FINGERPRINTING
20 VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION
21 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-COMCAST
22 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT
23 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER
24 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE
25 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE
26 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE
27 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE
28 BUILDING PERMIT S
29 FIRE PERMIT
30 ENGINEERING PERMIT
31 ANIMAL LICENSES
32 STREET AND CURB PERMIT
33 STREET AND CURB PERMIT W/LEASEHOLD TAX
34 OTRNON-BUSLIC/PERMITS
35 SPECIAL EVENT REVIEW
INTERGOVERNMENTAL:
36 FEDERAL GRANTS - BUDGET ONLY
37 DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST
38 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT
39 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND
40 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY
41 WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT
42 WASHINGTON STATE ARTS COMMISSION
43 PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX
44 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT
45 CJ -POPULATION
46 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS
47 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION
48 DUI - CITIES
49 FIRE INS PREMIUM TAX
50 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX
51 LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS
52 MISCELLANEOUS INTERLOCAL REVENUE
53 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND
54 DISCOVERY PROGRAMS TECHNOLOGY ACQ.
$ 11,327,000
$ 5,612,365
$ 5,742,964
$ 5,584,036
5101(
4,578,000
2,236,457
2,303,424
2,274,576
5001(
500
27
4
496
10/(
11,900,000
4,483,349
4,607,308
7,292,692
391/1(
7,600
7,539
9,055
(1,455)
1190/(
1,150,000
415,496
424,737
725,263
370/c
1,900,000
858,720
887,688
1,012,312
470/(
845,000
469,966
562,001
282,999
670/(
384,000
143,254
163,027
220,973
420/(
1,000,234
350,681
363,282
636,952
361/1(
942,960
321,835
424,703
518,257
450/(
621,458
253,170
261,645
359,813
420/(
850,000
342,948
342,228
507,772
400/(
773,000
208,020
171,355
601,645
220/(
80,200
38,435
44,677
35,523
560/(
350
-
22
328
60/(
326,000
152,734
160,306
165,694
490/(
36,686,302
15,894,995
16,468,426
20,217,876
45%
250
100
50
200
200/(
700
20
420
280
600/(
94,500
29,774
31,950
62,550
340/(
702,700
349,602
344,068
358,632
490/(
41,000
15,062
13,875
27,125
340/(
100,600
24,677
20,529
80,071
200/(
450,000
199,970
227,219
222,781
500/(
250,000
102,163
109,000
141,000
440/(
80,000
41,935
41,490
38,510
520/(
30,000
30,173
13,962
16,038
470/(
750,600
348,456
198,800
551,800
260/(
-
-
2,300
(2,300)
00/(
-
-
25,094
(25,094)
00/(
24,000
9,386
11,648
12,352
490/(
75,000
39,405
19,990
55,010
270/(
-
-
3,447
(3,447)
00/(
20,000
-
7,211
12,789
360/(
-
6,450
551
(551)
00/(
2,619,350
1,197,173
1,071,604
1,547,746
410%
166,309
-
-
166,309
00/(
9,000
5,237
-
9,000
00/(
11,100
718
9,479
1,621
850/(
1,494,875
-
24,010
1,470,865
20/(
244,645
-
-
244,645
00/(
-
307
-
-
00/(
34,000
2,000
-
34,000
00/(
210,500
-
219,274
(8,774)
1040/(
16,740
10,776
5,338
11,402
320/(
13,070
7,142
7,518
5,552
580/(
50,600
25,386
26,595
24,005
530/c
125,000
24,665
26,513
98,487
210/(
4,500
3,587
105
4,395
20/(
-
56,744
75,698
(75,698)
00/(
325,000
152,556
150,641
174,359
460/(
343,200
83,190
82,149
261,051
240/(
-
-
500
(500)
00/(
1,000
-
-
1,000
00/(
550
-
-
550
00/(
3,050,089
372,308
627,819
2,422,270
210%
Q
2022 Local Retail Sa/esiUse Tax revenues are $123,960 higher than 2021 revenues. Please also see pagespages 5 & 6.
21 1
Packet Pg. 31 1
6.3.a
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2023 Amended 5/31/2022 5/31/2023 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES:
1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
2 ATM SURCHARGE FEES
3 CREDIT CARD FEES
4 COURT RECORD SERVICES
5 D/M COURT REC SER
6 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE
7 IT TIME PAY FEE
8 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN
9 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS
10 PHOTOCOPIES
11 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS
12 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES
13 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILINGFEES
14 CUSTODIAL SERVICES(SNO-ISLE)
15 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES
16 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS
17 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.
18 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION
19 MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES
20 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS
21 LEGAL SERVICES
22 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE
23 BOOKING FEES
24 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES
25 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES
26 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE
27 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS
28 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE
29 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION
30 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
31 PLANNING REVIEW AND INSPECTION
32 S.E.P.A. REVIEW
33 ENGINEERINGPLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION
34 CRITICAL AREA STUDY
35 GYM AND WEI MTROOM FEES
36 PROGRAM FEES
37 HOLIDAY MARKET REGISTRATION FEES
38 UPTOWN EVENING MARKET FEES
39 WINTERMARKET FEES
40 EDMONDS COMMUNITY FAIR FEES
41 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES
42 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS
$ 3,000 $
2,212 $
924
$ 2,076
310/(
600
72
76
524
130/(
6,000
441
-
6,000
00/(
150
1
-
150
00/(
300
-
-
300
00/(
4,000
-
-
4,000
00/(
1,000
49
58
942
60/(
50
72
88
(38)
1760/(
25,000
-
-
25,000
00/(
100
51
6
94
60/(
1,000
-
-
1,000
00/(
190,000
102,328
33,986
156,014
180/(
1,400
2,885
-
1,400
00/(
100,000
46,468
26,752
73,248
270/(
5,000
2,275
30,205
(25,205)
6040/(
30,000
-
-
30,000
00/(
14,000
251
-
14,000
00/(
210,970
52,742
113,713
97,258
540/(
-
25
20
(20)
00/(
67,000
35,250
43,768
23,232
650/(
1,050
302
-
1,050
00/(
38,000
7,852
4,209
33,791
110/(
3,000
216
66
2,934
20/(
10,000
11,851
8,848
1,152
880/(
3,500
220
323
3,177
90/(
1,077,500
238,403
611,546
465,954
570/(
5,000
1,943
2,453
2,547
490/(
65,600
47,673
17,064
48,536
260/(
425,000
129,976
282,420
142,580
660/(
4,000
7,036
9,207
(5,207)
2300/(
500
110
36,374
(35,874)
72750/(
3,000
3,700
2,430
570
810/(
-
-
10,206
(10,206)
00/(
14,000
8,010
8,529
5,471
610/(
13,000
1,015
4,476
8,524
340/(
990,959
333,500
434,571
556,388
440/(
5,000
-
455
4,545
90/(
5,000
740
-
5,000
00/(
5,000
7,310
9,005
(4,005)
1800/(
-
-
150
(150)
00/(
1,000
-
-
1,000
00/(
3,427,765
491,040
1,362,001
2,065,764
400/(
6,757,444
1,536,019
3,053,930
3,703,514
457%
r
Q
22
Packet Pg. 32
6.3.a
Page 3 of 3
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
REVENUES - GENERAL FUND
2023 Amended 5/31/2022 5/31/2023 Amount
Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received
FINES AND PENALTIES:
1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY
2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION
4 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)
5 CURRENT TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS
6 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES
7 OTHERINFRACTIONS'04
8 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES
9 PARK/INDDISZONE
10 DWI PENALTIES
11 DUI - DP ACCT
12 CRIM CNV FEE DUI
13 DUI - DP FEE
14 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03
15 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT
16 CRIM CONV FEE CT
17 OTHER NON-T RAF MISDEMEANOR PEN
18 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03
19 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT
20 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN
21 CRIM CONV FEE CN
22 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT
23 BANK CHARGE FOR CONY. DEFENDANT
24 COURT COST RECOUPMENT
25 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY
26 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES
MISCELLANEOUS:
27 INVESTMENT INTEREST
28 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES
29 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS
30 LOAN INTEREST
31 SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS
32 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL
33 LEASESLONG-TERM
34 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION
35 PARKSDONATIONS
36 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS
37 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES
38 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE
39 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY
40 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY
41 OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT
42 POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION
43 CASHIER'S OVERAGES/SHORTAGES
44 OTHER MISC REVENUES
45 SMALL OVERPAYMENT
46 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC
47 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT
48 NSF FEES - DEVEL SERV DEPT
49 L&I STAY AT WORK PROGRAM
50 US BANK REBATE
51 INSURANCE RECOVERIES
TO TAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE
$ 2,000 $
673 $
1,086 $
914
540/(
130,000
24,863
37,182
92,818
290/(
18,000
1,933
881
17,119
501(
10,000
1,535
1,264
8,736
130/(
-
-
31,873
(31,873)
00/(
1,000
-
4,586
(3,586)
4590/(
1,500
265
1,222
278
810/(
125,000
6,270
2,570
122,430
20/(
2,000
114
239
1,761
120/(
7,000
1,159
1,345
5,655
190/(
300
27
1
299
00/(
100
14
-
100
00/(
1,500
596
622
878
410/(
25,000
3,792
3,192
21,808
130/(
2,000
613
560
1,440
280/(
700
37
3
697
00/(
100
-
100
0
1000/(
12,000
1,187
108
11,892
1 %
800
12
100
700
130/(
1,000
171
48
952
501(
200
-
-
200
00/(
6,000
1,671
935
5,065
160/(
4,000
1,217
2,446
1,554
610/(
1,000
74
393
607
390/(
1,000
50
-
1,000
00/(
150
-
-
150
00/(
352,350
46,271
90,756
261,594
260%
321,240
98,440
42,408
278,832
130/(
10,960
2,904
30,602
(19,642)
2790/(
12,180
2,369
1,010
11,170
80/(
12,080
-
-
12,080
00/(
175,000
44,333
41,622
133,378
240/(
2,100
-
-
2,100
00/(
210,000
85,929
94,299
115,701
450/(
1,500
239
105
1,395
70
3,500
2,300
4,000
(500)
1140/(
1,500
370
40
1,460
30/(
5,000
249
-
5,000
00/(
300
76
619
(319)
2060/(
3,800
1,288
2,403
1,397
630/(
2,000
-
-
2,000
00/(
146,000
-
49,007
96,993
34°/
200
100
47
153
240/(
-
30
10
(10)
00/(
5,000
808
20,645
(15,645)
4130/(
100
26
1
99
10/(
100
30
-
100
00/(
150
60
-
150
00/(
-
-
4
(4)
00/(
-
-
8,702
(8,702)
00/(
8,500
3,896
7,494
1,006
880/(
800,000
-
-
800,000
00/(
1,721,210
243,446
303,016
1,418,194
189/(
$ 51,186,745
$19,290,212
$ 21,615,550
$ 29,571,195
420/(
w
Q
23
Packet Pg. 33
I 6.3.a I
Page 1 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2023 Amended
5/31/2022
5/31/2023
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 23,641,702
$ 7,171,108
$ 8,896,602
$ 14,745,100
380/
2 OVERTIME
649,080
462,889
397,540
251,540
610/
3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK
294,001
8,212
5,674
288,327
20/
4 BENEFITS
8,031,104
2,681,368
3,202,380
4,828,724
400/
5 UNIFORMS
130,851
31,471
61,050
69,801
470/
6 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
165,023
34,118
37,156
127,867
230/
7 SUPPLIES
759,025
168,396
171,461
587,564
230/
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
307,791
49,557
73,701
234,090
240/
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
18,312,206
6,175,612
7,383,315
10,928,891
400/
10 COMMUNICATIONS
241,295
57,465
91,834
149,461
380/
11 TRAVEL
74,795
18,300
38,066
36,729
510/
12 EXCISE TAXES
16,500
12,094
11,248
5,252
680/
13 RENTAL/LEASE
2,780,344
838,322
1,107,640
1,672,704
400/
14INSURANCE
625,650
503,160
625,650
(0)
1000/
15 UTILITIES
663,800
238,995
265,954
397,846
400/
16 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE
673,900
237,263
485,348
188,552
720/
17 MISCELLANEOUS
667,593
248,404
296,636
370,957
440/
18 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS
50,000
50,000
50,000
-
1000/
19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
1,341,982
-
-
1,341,982
00/
20 BUILDINGS
800,000
45,195
284,460
515,540
360/
21 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
430,000
96,343
4,264
425,736
10/
22 CONSTRUCT IONS PROJECTS
800,565
-
7,480
793,085
10/
23 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
191,620
-
191,620
00/
24 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT
131,470
-
131,470
00/
25 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
500
212
-
500
00/
61,780,797
19,128,482
23,497,459
38,283,338
38°/
LEO FF-MEDIC AL INS. RESERVE(009)
26 BENEFITS
$
206,650
$
78,420
$
90,242
$
116,408
440/
27 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS
152,990
33,405
64,518
88,472
420/
28 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,000
13,704
-
7,000
00/
29 MISCELLANEOUS
500
485
-
500
00/
367,140
126,014
S
154,761
212,379
420/
RISK MANAG04ENT RESERVE FUND (011)
30 MISCELLANEOUS
$
25,000
$
-
$
$
25,000
00/
25,000
25,000
00/
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014)
31 SUPPLIES
$
100
$
$
$
100
00/
32 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
200
200
00/
33 MISCELLANEOUS
5,600
5,600
00/
5,900
5,900
00/
BUILDING MAINTENANCEFUND (016)
34 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
121,500
$
450
$
$
121,500
00/
35 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE
1,153,500
16,072
15,468
1,138,032
10/
36 BUILDINGS
-
-
19,778
(19,778)
00/
37 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
552
-
-
00/
1,275,000
17,074
S
35,246
1,239,754
3°/
DRUG INFO RC EMENT FUND (104)
38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
45,000
$
-
S
-
$
45,000
00/
39 REPAIR/MAINT
800
800
00/
45,800
$
45,800
00/
t
O
Q.
d
lY
C
R
C
LL
z
C
O
M
N
0
N
A
t
O
O.
d
C
O
C
IL
s
C
O
M
N
0
N
C
d
E
t
t�
O
r
w
Q
24
Packet Pg. 34
I 6.3.a I
Page 2 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2023 Amended
5/31/2022
5/31/2023
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
% Spent
STREETFUND (111)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 1,017,313
$ 290,997
$ 501,844
$ 515,469
494
2 OVERTIME
38,400
13,596
14,031
24,369
374
3 BENEFITS
415,385
142,682
197,776
217,609
480
4 UNIFORMS
6,000
3,912
4,404
1,596
730
5 SUPPLIES
263,000
47,993
83,737
179,263
32°
6 SMALL EQUIPMENT
20,000
985
1,657
18,343
8°
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
23,210
9,905
4,934
18,276
210
8 COMMUNICATIONS
4,500
2,426
2,794
1,706
620
9 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
09
10 RENTAL/LEASE
304,730
120,178
126,166
178,564
414
11 INSURANCE
126,466
184,111
126,467
(1)
1000
12 UTILITIES
273,730
88,863
93,636
180,094
340
13 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
52,000
18,073
8,682
43,318
170
14 MISCELLANEOUS
8,000
10,891
6,310
1,690
790
15 BUILDINGS
25,000
-
-
25,000
04
16 OTHERIMPROVEMENTS
-
165,353
(165,353)
09
17 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL
4,380
-
4,380
09
18 INTEREST
300
-
300
00
$
2,583,414
$
934,609
$
1,337,791
$
1,245,623
524
COMBINED STREETCONST)TMPROVE(112)
19 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
3,817,980
$
203,066
$
487,808
$
3,330,172
130
20 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
1,139,535
21,729
-
1,139,535
00
21 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
172,650
-
-
172,650
09
22 LAND
270,000
36,264
-
270,000
04
23 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
5,818,580
270,868
1,627,397
4,191,183
2M
24 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
54,070
72,201
54,058
12
1000
25 INTEREST
880
1,230
869
11
990
$
11,273,695
$
605,359
$
2,170,132
$
9,103,563
194
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117)
26 SUPPLIES
$
4,700
$
548
$
515
$
4,185
110
27 SMALL EQUIPMENT
1,700
-
-
1,700
00
28 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
191,000
15,328
32,707
158,293
170
29 TRAVEL
80
-
-
80
04
30 RENTAL/LEASE
3,000
-
3,000
09
31 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
300
-
-
300
04
32 MISCELLANEOUS
6,600
1,064
1,663
4,937
250
$
207,380
$
16,940
$
34,885
$
172,495
17
HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120)
33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
90,400
$
19,714
$
3,934
$
86,466
44
34 MISCELLANEOUS
1,000
-
-
1,000
0R
35 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
4,000
-
-
4,000
0°
$
95,400
$
19,714
$
3,934
$
91,466
4,
EMPLO YEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (12 1)
36 SUPPLIES
$
1,790
$
-
$
-
$
1,790
09
37 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
25,090
-
25,090
00
$
26,880
$
$
-
$
26,880
09
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122)
38 MISCELLANEOUS
$
3,000
$
$
-
$
3,000
04
$
3,000
$
$
-
$
3,000
04
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123)
39 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$
28,500
$
533
$
5,222
$
23,278
184
$
28,500
8
533
$
5,222
$
23,278
189
r
Q
25
Packet Pg. 35
I 6.3.a I
Page 3 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2023 Amended
5/31/2022
5/31/2023
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
REAL ESTATE EXC ISE TAX 2 (125)
1 SUPPLIES
$ -
$ 11,221
$ -
$ -
09
2 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
616,867
90,527
144,636
472,231
239
3 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
1,148,910
56,569
72,970
1,075,940
69
4 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
5,684
-
-
5,684
09
5 LAND
200,000
-
77,433
122,567
399
6 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
2,343,957
484,788
521,036
1,822,921
229
$ 4,315,418
$ 643,105
$ 816,074
$ 3,499,344
190
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAXI (126)
7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
8 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
9 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
10 LAND
11 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
12 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
13 INTEREST
14 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127)
15 SALARIES AND WAGES
16 OVERTIME
17 BENEFIT S
18 SUPPLIES
19 SMALL EQUIPMENT
20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
21 RENTALILEASE
22 MISCELLANEOUS
C EMEIERY MAINTENANC UIMPRO VEMENT (13 0)
23 SALARIES AND WAGES
24 OVERTIME
25 BENEFIT S
26 UNIFORMS
27 SUPPLIES
28 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
29 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
30 COMMUNICATIONS
31 TRAVEL
32 RENTAL/LEASE
33 UTILITIES
34 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
35 MISCELLANEOUS
PARKS TRUSTFUND (136)
36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CEIM KIERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND (137)
37 SMALL EQUIPMENT
SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138)
38 SUPPLIES
39 TRAVEL
40 MISCELLANEOUS
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (140)
41 SUPPLIES
42 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
43 MISCELLANEOUS
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND (142)
44 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREE FUND (143)
45 SUPPLIES
46 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
47 LAND
$ 260,420 $
23,581 $
127,284 $ 133,136
490
578,340
13,266
2,729 575,611
09
147,557
-
- 147,557
09
-
-
- -
00
554,755
97,473
- 554,755
09
155,470
-
- 155,470
09
103,970
-
- 103,970
09
-
380
- -
09
$ 1,800,512 $
134,700 $
130,013 $ 1,670,499
79
$ 196,455 $
$ 38,896 $
157,559
209
-
2,840
(2,840)
09
80,033
17,518
62,515
229
146,000
4,334 30,113
115,887
210
500
- -
500
09
56,500
-
56,500
09
17,510
7,296
10,214
429
600
- 348
252
580
$ 497,598 $
4,334 $ 97,011 $
400,587
199
$ 137,541 $
39,143 $
58,687 $
78,854
439
3,500
492
1,154
2,346
339
54,487
16,016
20,992
33,495
399
1,000
-
-
1,000
09
7,000
410
2,771
4,229
409
20,000
9,933
9,920
10,080
509
4,200
1,150
1,438
2,762
349
1,700
716
720
980
429
500
-
-
500
09
9,420
4,890
3,977
5,444
429
5,565
1,876
2,235
3,330
409
500
-
-
500
09
4,000
3,868
5,336
(1,336)
1339
$ 249,413 $
78,494 $
107,230 $
142,183
439
$ 43,842 $ 2,540 $ - $ 43,842 09
$ 43,842 $ 2,540 $ - $ 43,842 09
$ 50,000 $ $ - $ 50,000 09
$ 50,000 $ $ - $ 50,000 09
$ 1,500 $ $ $ 1,500 09
4,500 4,500 09
5,900 70 415 5,485 79
$ 11,900 $ 70 $ 415 $ 11,485 39
$ 4,091 $
466 $
1,433 $
2,658 359
78,327
20,190
18,300
60,027 239
6,157
222
1,157
5,000 199
88,575
20,878
20,890
67,685 249
$ 1,669,000 $ 380,776 $ 673,314 $ 995,686 409
$ 1,669,000 380,776 673,314 995,686 409
$ 1,000 $ $ - $ 1,000 09
39,800 - 39,800 09
199,000 - 199,000 09
239,800 - 239,800 0°
t
O
N
C
R
C
LL
21
s_
C
O
2
M
N
0
N
A
O
t
O
lZ
d
w
<0
C
C
M
z
C
O
2
M
N
0
N
C
N
1=
t
c�
r
w
Q
26
Packet Pg. 36
I 6.3.a I
Page 4 of 6
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2023 Amended 5/31/2022 5/31/2023 Amount
Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent
2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231)
1 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND $ 235,000 $ $ - $ 235,000 09
2 INTEREST 74,800 - 74,800 09
$ 309,800 $ $ - $ 309,800 09
PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332)
3 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
4 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
6 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
7 INTEREST
WATER FUND (421)
8 SALARIES AND WAGES
9 OVERTIME
10 BENEFIT S
11 UNIFORMS
12 SUPPLIES
13 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE
14 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
15 SMALL EQUIPMENT
16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
17 COMMUNICATIONS
18 TRAVEL
19 EXCISE TAXES
20 RENTAL/LEASE
21INSURANCE
22 UTILITIES
23 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
24 MISCELLANEOUS
25 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
26 BUILDINGS
27 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
28 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
29 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
30 REVENUE BONDS
31 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
32 INTEREST
33 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
STORM FUND (422)
34 SALARIES AND WAGES
35 OVERTIME
36 BENEFIT S
37 UNIFORMS
38 SUPPLIES
39 SMALL EQUIPMENT
40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
41 COMMUNICATIONS
42 TRAVEL
43 EXCISE TAXES
44 RENTAL/LEASE
45INSURANCE
46 UTILITES
47 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
48 MISCELLANEOUS
49 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
50 LAND
51 BUILDINGS
52 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
53 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
54 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
55 REVENUE BONDS
56 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
57 INTEREST
58 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
$
-
$
62,656
$
-
$
-
09
1,352,620
170,170
147,950
1,204,670
119
805,377
2,090,315
826,809
(21,432)
1030
50,000
-
-
50,000
09
47,650
-
-
47,650
09
$
2,255,647
$
2,323,141
$
974,759
$
1,280,888
439
$
1,108,268
$
318,564
$
442,298
$
665,970
409 p
24,000
6,449
7,207
16,793
309
422,439
133,792
161,218
261,221
389
4,000
2,189
2,457
1,543
610
150,000
56,039
62,524
87,476
429 'v
2,398,000
535,745
549,883
1,848,117
239
180,000
72,908
55,892
124,108
319 C
13,500
2,527
3,009
10,491
229 LE
2,256,928
279,744
622,022
1,634,906
289 >+
35,000
13,234
14,448
20,552
419
200
-
462
(262)
2319 C
1,696,934
528,176
549,068
1,147,866
329
187,952
62,765
77,194
110,758
419 M
225,380
122,359
225,379
1
1009 c
35,000
13,870
15,703
19,297
459 cV
71,130
11,863
19,705
51,425
289
123,600
84,834
106,483
17,117
860
646,370
-
-
646,370
09
12,500
-
12,500
09
10,000
-
-
10,000
09 Q
1,670,000
87,212
47,283
1,622,717
39 4)
2,940
-
-
2,940
09 _
333,830
-
-
333,830
09
25,840
25,839
25,839
1
1009 =
185,300
388
258
185,042
09
-
378
-
-
09
$
11,819,111
$
2,358,873
$
2,988,333
$
8,830,778
259
s
$
991,952
$
323,817
$
509,624
$
482,328
519 C
26,000
9,276
4,608
21,392
180 0
376,317
133,632
175,797
200,520
47' M
6,500
5,543
4,801
1,699
740 N
46,000
25,327
6,603
39,397
149 N
4,000
985
1,713
2,287
439 >,
3,124,919
334,006
548,725
2,576,194
189
3,200
2,087
2,828
372
880 ,
4,300
-
-
4,300
09
499,658
293,490
303,484
196,174
619
293,210
109,858
120,424
172,786
419
31,679
82,335
31,680
(1)
1009
10,500
7,120
7,469
3,031
719 w
189,130
11,302
11,327
177,803
69 Q
232,300
88,269
95,941
136,359
419
283,237
-
-
283,237
09
680,000
-
680,000
09
25,000
-
25,000
09
-
-
12,536
(12,536)
09
1,031,645
281,617
174,801
856,844
179
107,290
-
-
107,290
09
160,870
-
-
160,870
09
61,600
32,063
32,063
29,538
529
103,070
481
321
102,749
09
-
165
-
-
09
$
8,292,377
$
1,741,370
$
2,044,743
$
6,247,634
259
27
Packet Pg. 37
I 6.3.a I
Page 5 of 6
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2023 Amended
5/31/2022
5/31/2023
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
SEWER FUND (423)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 2,836,518
$ 752,725
$ 1,434,343
$ 1,402,175
519
2 OVERTIME
130,000
59,197
67,599
62,401
520
3 BENEFITS
940,857
300,600
479,087
461,770
510
4 UNIFORMS
11,500
7,197
7,265
4,235
630
5 SUPPLIES
453,000
131,870
204,851
248,149
459
6 FUEL CONSUMED
20,000
-
-
20,000
09
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE
5,000
-
-
5,000
09
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
83,900
95,443
3,561
80,339
49
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,587,949
923,642
985,916
1,602,033
389
10 COMMUNICATIONS
48,000
19,269
20,836
27,164
439
11 TRAVEL
5,000
-
144
4,856
39
12 EXCISE TAXES
1,026,360
412,890
518,861
507,499
519
13 RENTAL/LEASE
312,006
134,401
129,710
182,296
420
14 INSURANCE
360,663
203,936
362,302
(1,639)
1000
15 UTILITIES
1,582,060
1,068,598
1,403,780
178,280
899
16 REPAIR& MAINTENANCE
728,630
392,452
97,432
631,198
139
17 MISCELLANEOUS
138,350
98,103
155,322
(16,972)
1120
18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
1,588,089
-
14,515
1,573,574
19
19 BUILDINGS
12,500
-
-
12,500
09
20 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
68,126
-
-
09
21 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
2,976,163
1,564,772
-
2,976,163
09
22 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
129,820
-
-
129,820
09
23 REVENUE BONDS
55,310
-
-
55,310
09
24 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS
104,000
159,017
88,050
15,950
859
25 INTEREST
353,270
4,589
3,667
349,603
19
26 OTHER INT EREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS
-
2,959
1,948
(1,948)
09
$ 16,488,945 $ 6,399,786 $ 5,979,189 $ 10,509,756 369
BOND RESERVE FUND (424)
27 REVENUE BONDS $ 840,010 $ - $ - $ 840,010 09
28INTEREST 1,149,810 - 1,149,810 09
$ 1,989,820 $ $ - S 1,989,820 09
r
Q
28
Packet Pg. 38
I 6.3.a I
Page 6 of 6
C ITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL
2023 Amended
5/31/2022
5/31/2023
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
EQ UIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511)
1 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 331,652
$ 124,683
$ 183,297
$ 148,355
554
2 OVERTIME
2,000
222
-
2,000
04
3 BENEFITS
115,897
48,014
57,128
58,769
490
4 UNIFORMS
1,500
785
1,113
387
744
5 SUPPLIES
149,120
55,588
39,920
109,200
270
6 FUEL CONSUMED
1,000
-
-
1,000
04
7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE
458,880
173,973
108,333
350,547
249
8 SMALL EQUIPMENT
58,000
2,072
939
57,061
29
9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
46,750
597
664
46,086
14
10 COMMUNICATIONS
3,000
864
1,263
1,737
424
11 TRAVEL
1,000
-
-
1,000
04
12 RENTAL/LEASE
17,470
4,311
6,917
10,553
404
13 INSURANCE
50,178
51,903
52,373
(2,195)
1044
14 UTILITIES
14,000
9,675
11,625
2,375
834
15 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE
60,000
14,102
16,223
43,777
270
16 MISCELLANEOUS
12,000
1,733
4,885
7,115
419
17 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
3,109,411
25,960
558,206
2,551,205
184
$ 4,431,858
$ 514,481
$ 1,042,885
$ 3,388,973
249
TEC HNO LO GY RENTAL FUND (512)
18 SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 657,771 $
111,086
$ 229,024
$ 428,747
354
19 OVERTIME
2,000
-
-
2,000
04
20 BENEFITS
191,954
43,470
84,257
107,697
444
21 SUPPLIES
5,000
4,036
3,851
1,149
779
22 SMALL EQUIPMENT
181,800
21,731
58,265
123,535
329
23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
61,860
6,359
25,532
36,328
419
24 COMMUNICATIONS
58,770
20,362
24,519
34,251
424
25 TRAVEL
1,500
-
-
1,500
04
26 RENTAL/LEASE
4,640
1,858
684
3,957
154
27 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
476,532
393,720
439,535
36,997
924
28 MISCELLANEOUS
55,600
424
9,802
45,798
184
29 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
56,000
-
13,060
42,940
239
$ 1,753,427 $
603,046
$ 888,529
$ 864,898
519
TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS
$ 134,024,949 $
36,054,321
$ 43,002,814
$ 91,022,135
324
O
N
is
C
R
C
LL
s
C
O
M
N
0
N
A
O
O
O.
d
w
C
O
C
iL
z
r
C
O
M
N
O
N
fC
C
N
1=
t
t�
r
r
Q
29
Packet Pg. 39
6.3.a
Page 1 of 1
M I VC13aD1311C19AIM
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY
Title
CITY COUNCIL
OFFICE OF MAYOR
HUMAN RESOURCES
MUNICIPAL COURT
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
CITY ATTORNEY
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
POLICE SERVICES
SATELLITE OFFICE
COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV.
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
PARKS & RECREATION
PUBLIC WORKS
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
Title
2023 Amended 5/31/2022 5/31/2023 Amount
Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent
$ 486,256 $
129,439 $
190,396 $
305,860
37%
504,873
148,671
164,114
340,759
33%
1,296,947
334,902
367,942
929,005
28%
2,240,163
482,322
611,186
1,628,977
27%
2,497,266
901,287
1,154,564
1,342,702
46%
1,161,780
388,315
349,828
811,952
30%
C
15,627,335
5,987,679
7,245,913
8,381,422
46%
N
14,993,027
5,133,192
5,521,298
9,471,729
37%
230,681
37,314
49,688
180,993
22%
C
R
1,309,051
216,588
470,437
838,614
36%
LL
5,236,088
1,419,912
1,622,646
3,613,442
31%
324,650
39,490
102,311
222,339
32%
C
6,573,617
1,709,318
2,229,794
4,343,823
34%
2
M
4,267,653
1,258,052
1,623,373
2,644,280
38%
N
N
5,031,410
942,003
1,803,967
3,227,443
36%
$ 61,780,797
$ 19,128,482
$ 23,497,459 $
38,283,338
38%
O
0.
O
CITY OF E DMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND
IN SUMMARY
C
2023 Amended
5/31/2022
5/31/2023
Amount
IL
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
s
WATER UTILITY FUND
$ 11,819,111 $
2,358,873 $
2,988,333 $
8,830,778
25%
0
STORM UTILITY FUND
8,292,377
1,741,370
2,044,743
6,247,634
25o/p
M
N
SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND
16,488,945
6,399,786
5,979,189
10,509,756
0
36%
N
BOND RESERVE FUND
1,989,820
-
-
1,989,820
0%
c'
cc
$ 38,590,253 $
10,500,030 $
11,012,265 $
27,577,988
29%
c
d
E
t
c�
O
Q
30
Packet Pg. 40
Page 1 of 2
C ITY O F EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
Title
2023 Amended
Budget
5/31/2022
Expenditures
5/31/2023
Expenditures
Amount
Remaining
%Spent
CITY COUNCIL
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
219,276
$
73,008
$
92,364
$
126,912
42%
BENEFITS
103,845
38,986
43,227
60,618
42%
SUPPLIES
11,000
1,006
968
10,032
9%
SERVICES
152,135
16,439
43,838
108,297
29%
$
486,256
$
129,439
$
180,396
$
305,860
37%
O FFIC E O F MAYO R
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
282,988
$
103,440
$
106,975
$
176,013
38%
BENEFITS
90,087
35,811
37,371
52,716
41%
SUPPLIES
1,500
1,555
1,042
458
69%
SERVICES
130,298
7,865
18,726
111,572
14%
.-.
C
$
504,873
$
148,671
$
164,114
$
340,759
33%
Q
HUMAN RESOURCES
N
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
782,258
$
194,660
$
211,950
$
570,308
27%
BENEFITS
243,609
67,416
80,810
162,799
33%
'V
SUPPLIES
13,600
701
549
13,051
4%
SERVICES
257,480
72,125
74,632
182,848
29%
C
$
1,296,947
$
334,902
$
367,942
$
929,005
28%
LL
MUNICIPAL C O URT
2'
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
1,594,770
$
315,526
$
402,085
$
1,192,685
25%
C
BENEFITS
434,072
93,801
128,311
305,761
30%
O
SUPPLIES
11,600
4,714
7,904
3,696
68%
2
SERVICES
199,721
68,281
72,885
126,836
36%
M
$
2,240,163
$
482,322
$
611,186
$
1,628,977
27%
N
ADM[NIS TRATIVE S ERVIC ES
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
1,601,894
$
557,511
$
735,490
$
866,404
46%
cc
BENEFITS
465,703
180,965
211,000
254,703
4570
SUPPLIES
13,000
5,268
3,434
9,566
26%
SERVICES
416,669
157,541
204,641
212,028
49%
Q.
$
2,497,266
$
901,287
$
1,154,564
$
1,342,702
46%
CITY ATTORNEY
SERVICES
$
1,161,780
$
388,315
$
349,828
$
811,952
$
1,161,780
$
388,315
$
349,828
$
811,952
30%
NON -DEPARTMENTAL
E
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
101,750
$
-
$
-
$
101,750
0%
LL
BENEFITS
239,583
53,452
58,430
181,153
24%
s
SUPPLIES
5,000
-
-
5,000
0%
SERVICES
13,565,430
5,884,015
7,137,483
6,427,947
53%
O
INTERFUND SUBSIDIES
1,391,982
50,000
50,000
1,341,982
4%
z
DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL
191,620
-
-
191,620
0%
CO)
DEBT SERVICE - INTEREST
131,970
212
-
131,970
0%
N
$
15,627,335
$
5,987,679
$
7,245,913
$
8,381,422
46%
PO LIC E SERVIC ES
cc
2
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
9,566,760
$
3,281,239
$
3,477,139
$
6,089,621
36%
BENEFITS
3,305,628
1,160,454
1,250,012
2,055,616
38%
SUPPLIES
342,941
81,278
62,377
280,564
18%
E
SERVICES
1,777,698
513,878
731,770
1,045,928
41%
U
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
-
96,343
-
-
0%
r
$
14,993,027
$
5,133,192
$
5,521,298
$
9,471,729
37%
Q
S ATELLITE O FFIC E
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
38,537
$
-
$
18,200
$
20,337
47%
BENEFITS
7,298
-
8,711
(1,413)
119%
SUPPLIES
17,000
11,057
-
17,000
0%
SERVICES
167,846
26,257
22,777
145,069
14%
$
230,681
$
37,314
$
49,688
$
180,993
22%
31
Packet Pg. 41 1
I 6.3.a I
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF EDMO NDS
EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL
2023 Amended
5/31/2022
5/31/2023
Amount
Title
Budget
Expenditures
Expenditures
Remaining
%Spent
COMMUNITY S ERVIC ES /EC O N DEV.
SALARIES AND WAGES
$ 613,413
$ 82,411
$ 266,780
$ 346,633
43%
BENEFITS
165,783
26,776
68,847
96,936
42%
SUPPLIES
4,075
269
442
3,633
11 %
SERVICES
525,780
107,133
134,368
391,412
26%
$ 1,309,051
$ 216,588
$ 470,437
$ 838,614
36%
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
2,392,581
$
858,176
$
982,774
$
1,409,807
41%
BENEFITS
779,673
295,708
358,284
421,389
46%
SUPPLIES
23,400
2,993
4,657
18,743
20%
SERVICES
2,040,434
263,035
276,931
1,763,503
14%
$
5,236,088
$
1,419,912
$
1,622,646
$
3,613,442
31%
HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
101,849
$
25,307
$
46,450
$
55,399
46%
BENEFITS
29,301
5,024
15,539
13,762
53%
SUPPLIES
15,000
442
661
14,339
4%
SERVICES
178,500
8,717
39,662
138,838
22%
324,650
39,490
102,311
222,339
32%
PARKS & REC REATIO N
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
3,318,976
$
968,866
$
1,263,918
$
2,055,058
38%
BENEFITS
1,060,280
334,040
433,275
627,005
41%
SUPPLIES
468,900
72,160
108,201
360,699
23%
SERVICES
1,635,461
334,252
424,400
1,211,061
26%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
90,000
-
-
90,000
0%
$
6,573,617
$
1,709,318
$
2,229,794
$
4,343,823
34%
PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
409,900
$
54,659
$
173,716
$
236,184
42%
BENEFITS
150,075
26,359
53,428
96,647
36%
SUPPLIES
9,600
1,733
6,251
3,349
65%
SERVICES
92,439
34,487
36,010
56,430
39%
$
662,014
$
117,239
$
269,404
$
392,610
41%
FACILITIES MAINTENANCE
SALARIES AND WAGES
1,163,868
358,167
598,583
565,285
51%
BENEFITS
439,117
143,049
219,147
219,970
50%
SUPPLIES
128,000
34,777
45,755.48
82,245
36%
SERVICES
1,359,860
360,816
644,277
715,583
47%
MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT
1,940,565
45,195
296,205
1,644,360
15%
$
5,031,410
$
942,003
$
1,803,967
$
3,227,443
36%
ENGINEERING
SALARIES AND WAGES
$
2,395,963
$
769,240
$
923,391
$
1,472,572
39%
BENEFITS
812,924
285,116
334,194
478,730
41%
SUPPLIES
2,200
-
2,921
(721)
133%
SERVICES
394,552
86,457
93,463
301,089
24%
$
3,605,639
$
1,140,813
$
1,353,969
$
2,251,670
38%
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES
$
61,780,797
$
19,128,482
$
23,497,459
$
38,283,338
38%
O
N
is
Z
C
R
C
LL
s_
C
O
M
N
O
N
R
O
C.
d
C
O
C
iL
s
C
O
z
CO)
N
O
N
O
C
d
>r
t
c�
O
r
r
Q
32
Packet Pg. 42
6.3.a
GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
GENERAL FUND
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
& SUBFUNDS
5/31 /2023 5/31 /2023
Q1
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
001-General Fund
$
10,021,042 $ 7,436,545
$ (6,642,630) $
(1,881,910
009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve
62,103 78,055
(102,272)
(154,761.
011-Risk Management Reserve Fund
25,000 25,000
-
-
o
012-Contingency Reserve Fund
1,782,150 1,782,150
-
-
014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund
11,701 11,701
-
-
016-Building Maintenance
4,303,695 4,446,971
(77,116)
7,092
017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation
849,766 849,766
-
-
c
018 - Edmonds Homelessness Response Fd
200,000 200,000
-
-
Total General Fund & Subfunds
$
17,255,458 $ 14,830,188
$ (6,822,019) $
(2,029,578
r
c
0
*$9,361,208 of the fund balance in Fund 001 added to the $1,782,150 balance in Fund 012, represent the required
M
No
20% operating reserve.
',
ca
There are no interfund loans outstanding at this time.
1`
0
Q.
m
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
OVERVIEW
U_
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
0
GOVERNMENTAL
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
N
FUNDS
5/31 /2023 5/31 /2023
Q1
YTD
0
N
Fund Balance Cash Balance
0
General Fund & Subfunds
$
17,255,458 $ 14,830,188
$ (6,822,019) $
(2,029,578
a�
Special Revenue
16,938,028 23,429,710
(592,673)
587,194
t
Capital Projects - Fund 332
(244,156) (180,110)
(410,079)
(451,838
U
Q
Total Governmental Funds
$
33,949,329 $ 38,079,789
$ (7,824,770) $
(1,894,223
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not
adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
33
Packet Pg. 43
6.3.a
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
SPECIAL REVENUE
5/31/2023
5/31/2023
Q1
YTD
Fund Balance
Cash Balance
104 - Drug Enforcement Fund
$ 68,472
$ 71,611
$ 59 $
902
111 - Street Fund
(381,644)
(320,748)
(636,911)
(790,328
112 - Combined Street Const/Im prove
3,647,846
1,348,388
409,512
1,208,341
117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
614,692
644,895
3,596
(20,196
O
a
120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
129,121
118,595
22,301
34,257
41
121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund
87,687
91,167
10,367
12,655
122 - Youth Scholarship Fund
15,299
16,005
13
91
123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
123,170
123,144
6,951
7,999
f°
c
125 -Real Estate Tax 2
3,021,918
3,276,687
23,403
(270,639;
ii
126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 *
4,447,128
4,614,829
197,574
421,607
127 - Gifts Catalog Fund
3,020,282
3,162,966
6,718
(43,511
130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement
236,801
249,871
(22,537)
(31,369
0
136 - Parks Trust Fund
153,942
161,439
(7,497)
(7,497
N
137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund
1,118,205
1,169,378
6,606
14,905
c
N
138 - Sister City Commission
19,597
20,519
(202)
(298
140 -Business Improvement Disrict
71,931
71,931
27,913
32,147
141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing Fd
255,878
248,240
21,312
21,312
V_
142 - Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund
60,048
8,122,645
(662,049)
(4,540;
0
143 - Tree Fund
227,654
238,150
198
1,355
Total Special Revenue
$ 16,938,028
$ 23,429,710
1 $ (592,673) $
587,194
*$200,000 of the fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well
as $1,000,000
U
for the purchase of Open Space.
ii
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
''
O
2
CO)
N
O
N
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
};
ENTERPRISE
FUNDS
5/31/2023
5/31/2023
Q1
YTD
c
a)
Fund Balance
Cash Balance
t
U
421 -Water Utility Fund
$ 33,108,002
$ 10,091,225
$ 689,909 $
1,219,378
r
Q
422 -Storm Utility Fund*
19,336,311
6,303,241
1,151,439
1,264,578
423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund
65,547,089
14,951,941
1,500,483
2,547,754
424 - Bond Reserve Fund
850,655
850,655
3,093
6,694
411 -Combined Utility Operation
57,265
105,235
37,625
57,265
Total Enterprise Funds
$ 118,899,321
$ 32,302,296
$ 3,382,549 $
5,095,670
*$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance
has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding.
*Please note that these revenues and expenses
occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
34
Packet Pg. 44
6.3.a
SUMMARY OVERVIEW
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND
BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
CITY-WIDE
5/31 /2023 5/31 /2023
Q1
YTD
Fund Balance Cash Balance
Governmental Funds
$ 33,949,329 $ 38,079,789
$ (7,824,770) $
(1,894,223
Enterprise Funds
118,899,321 32,302,296
3,382,549
5,095,670
Internal Services Fund
10,180,210 5,800,034
(599,997)
(178,094
0
Total City-wide Total
$ 163,028,861 $ 76,182,119
$ (5,042,219) $
3,023,354
c
c�
c
ii
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW
O
a
M
N
O
N
BALANCES
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
---- ACTUAL ----
---- ACTUAL ----
o
Q-
INTERNAL SERVICE
FUNDS
5/31 /2023 5/31 /2023
Q1
YTD
W
Fund Balance Cash Balance
Fa
U
c
511 - Equipment Rental Fund
$ 9,443,581 $ 5,364,916
$ (269,014) $
47,780
ii
512 -Technology Rental Fund
736,629 435,118
(330,983)
(225,874
21
t
Total Internal Service Funds
$ 10,180,210 $ 5,800,034
$ (599,997) $
(178,094
c
0
Z
CO)
N
O
N
f�
C
N
E
t
V
fC
a+
Q
*Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles.
This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles.
35
Packet Pg. 45
6.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Written Public Comments
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Acknowledge receipt of written public comments.
Narrative
Public comments submitted to the web form for public comments
<https://www.edmondswa.gov/publiccomment>
between July 13, 2023 and July 19, 2023.
Attachments:
Public Comment July 25, 2023
Packet Pg. 46
6.4.a
Edmonds City Council Public Comments —July 25, 2023
Submitted on: 7/15/2023 9:01:27 AM
Name: Robert Rogowski
City of Residence: Edmonds
Agenda Topic: Ferry Boat Horn @6am Sat
Comments: Trains are quiet in the Edmonds bowl. Why are the ferry boats blowing their horns @6am
on Sat??
Submitted on: 7/15/2023 11:23:29 AM
Name: PETER STEPHENS
City of Residence: Edmonds
Agenda Topic: Paving
Comments: Lived in Meadowdale for 25 years. With the exception of the north end of the dead end
section of the road, 74th Place West has not been resurfaced during this period. I have spoken to Road
Maintenance folks who always refer me to the Council and to try and get it into the budget. One time I
was told it was scheduled but the dollars went to paving Meadowdale Beach Road at the request of a
council member at the time. The project manager tries to minimize his mobilization costs by doing
several jobs in the same area. Apparently 74th doesn't get the attention because there is nothing else in
the area deserving of attention??? The road is in disrepair and continues to generate potholes. There
are some areas where the surface rolls up when using the leaf blower to sweep the street (no street
sweeping action here either).Please give it some priority. If you want pictures I will happily take them
and forward them to you. Respectfully, Peter Stephens 16703 74th Place West
Submitted on: 7/18/2023 12:34:10 PM
Name: Karen Haase Herrick
City of Residence: Edmonds, WA
Agenda Topic: VIA Contract for Comp Plan Revision
Comments: I have been an Edmonds resident since 1989. 1 grew up in rural Ohio. I have lived in small
and large cities, Europe, and rural areas of our country. I served as a commissioner on the Edmonds
Citizen Housing Commission. My comments are grounded in these lived experiences. This contract
proposal is too expensive and too focused on turning Edmonds into a city rather than managing its
growth as resilient and welcoming suburb. The contract will continue some flawed public input
processes done using the Equitable Engagemnt Framework which disenfranchised many. Edmonds
residents while using input from people and non profit groups residing outside Edmonds. Ciry Council
members, please vote down this contract and ask the Planning Department to scale back their dreams
of growing Edmonds into a Bellevue -like suburb of Seattle. We have solid small city procedures that can
be used to gather input from all residents to revise our Comp Plan. LetA€TMs think smaller and affordable
for once. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to this issue.
Packet Pg. 47
6.4.a
Edmonds City Council Public Comments —July 25, 2023
Submitted on: 7/19/2023 1:56:14 PM
Name: Joan Bloom
City of Residence: Edmonds
Agenda Topic: Becky Peterson email to Ken Reidy: Starting July 15th, emails sent to
council@edmondswa.gov will no longer be forwarded to all Councilmembers.
Comments: Council President Tibbott, Please reconsider this decision. Making voters jump through
hoops to communicate to their representatives is unacceptable. This decision lacks transparency.
Citizens/residents/stakeholders of Edmonds need a convenient way to email all Council members. I have
found the public comment email unacceptable as a replacement, for the following reasons. First, there is
a word limit. Second, the Beacon, and other newspapers, can take comments and print them, without
the writer's permission. This has happened to me. Third, Council members are given another excuse not
to reply. I have so many questions: (1) Who decided upon this change to eliminate the
Council@edmondswa.gov email address? Council has provided that option for the convenience of
citizens for many years. Why eliminate that option? (2) Why did I have to find out from an email to Ken
Reidy that I was blind copied on? (3) When/how will you be notifying ALL citizens/residents of Edmonds
of this change? I'm getting the impression that Council would prefer not to hear from their
constituents. Please prove to me how I'm wrong. Again, I request that Council reconsider this decision.
Making voters jump through hoops to communicate to their representatives is unacceptable. Joan
Bloom Former Edmonds City Councilmember (but you know that)
c
a�
E
E
0
U
v
a.
c
m
r
Packet Pg. 48
6.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Outside Boards and Committee Reports
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
Outside Boards and Committee Reports will be submitted to the Received for Filing portion of the
agenda for last meeting of the month.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The Council is asked to review the attached committee reports/minutes from the following
organizations:
Community Transit
Seashore Transportation
Port of Edmonds
SNO-COM911
Snohomish County Tomorrow
Edmonds Public Facilities District
Attachments:
07.06.23 Board Packet Community Transit
Seashore Minutes 6-2-2-23
7-7-2023_SeaShore_Briefing
CS Implementation SeaShore 20230707
Port Of Edmonds _ Commission Meeting Minutes 6-12-23
Port Of Edmonds _ 2023 Port of Edmonds Special Commission Meeting Minutes
SNO911-Board-Agenda-20230720
SCT Steering May 24, 2023
pfd-board-meeting-minutes-05-25-2023
Packet Pg. 49
I 6.5.a I
C, BOARD OF DIRECTORS' Thursday
Commuy HYBRID MEETING AGENDA July 6, 2023
transi
�r� n S It Snohomish County Public Transportation Benefit Area Corporation 3:00 p.m.
Community Transit Board Room - 2312 W Casino Road, Everett, WA 98204
Board Meeting Virtual Participation
Zoom Webinar: https://us02web.zoom.us/6/87858511746?pwd=UVZwc3doeW41 LOpRSFBZbVBVVWIhQT09
Webinar ID: 878 5851 1746 Passcode: 433505 Phone: 1-253-215-8782
Watch Live
Livestream: https://bit.ly/CTPublicMtgsYouTube
Executive Session (Board Members & Alternates)
Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/'/82399882667?pwd=aFJYeEhONDI1 NOhUSnVtcExhaWVTUT09
Meeting ID: 823 9988 2667 Passcode: 799805 Phone: 1-253-215-8782
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3. WELCOME & REMARKS
4. PUBLIC COMMENT*
Verbal Comment: Sign up to speak by completing this Sign Up Form. Requested by 4 p.m. July 5.
Written Comment: Email comments to executiveoffice(D-commtrans.org. Requested by 4 p.m. July 5
5. PRESENTATIONS
a. Draft 2023-2028 Transit Development Plan — Sophie Luthin
b. September 2023 — March 2024 Service Change — Chris Simmons
6. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT
7. COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. Executive Committee — Chair Schuette
b. Finance, Performance, & Oversight Committee — Mayor Roberts
C. Strategic Alignment & Capital Development Committee — Council Member Merrill
8. CONSENT ITEMS**
a• Approve minutes of the June 1, 2023 Board Meeting.
b• Approve vouchers dated May 5, 2023 in the amount of $ 1,387,525.30.
C. Approve vouchers dated May 12, 2023 in the amount of $ 3,205,458.05.
d. Approve vouchers dated May 19, 2023 in the amount of $ 5,481,567.84.
e. Approve vouchers dated May 26, 2023 in the amount of $ 3,903,752.95.
f. Approve May 2023 Payroll:
i. Direct Deposits Issued, # 435406 — 436931 in the amount of $3,969,571.95.
ii. Paychecks Issued, # 111156 — 111229 in the amount of $86,793.04.
Page 1 of 2
*Advance sign up for verbal public comments is not required but requested to support meeting administration.
**Indicates attachment
2312 W Casino Road Everett, WA 98204 (425) 348-7100 www.communitytransit.o Packet Pg. 50
6.5.a
iii. Employer Payroll Tax Deposits in the amount of $453,291.88.
iv. Employer Deferred Compensation for IAM in the amount of $10,667.54.
9. ACTION ITEMS
a. Award ITB #2023-003, Lynnwood RideStore Remodel — Greg Stamatiou
10. CHAIR'S REPORT
11. BOARD COMMUNICATION
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION
13. OTHER BUSINESS
14. ADJOURN
Board materials are available at www.communitvtransit.org/meetings. In compliance with the Americans
with Disabilities Act, those requiring accommodation for meetings should notify the executive office at least
24 hours prior to the meeting at 425-348-7100 (TTY Relay 711) or executiveoffice(aD-commtrans.org.
Page 2 of 2
**Indicates attachment
u
2312 W Casino Road Everett, WA 98204 (425) 348-7100 www.communitytransit.org
Packet Pg. 51
6.5.a
0
Q.
m
o:
d
d
E
E
0
U
c
N
L
0
m
Presentations 0
.N
L
E
E
0
U
d
V
m
IL
L
m
0
CO
M
N
O
O
ti
O
C
N
E
s
u
0
Q
Packet Pg. 52
6.5.a
co ummco nitytran��
To: Board of Directors
From: Sophie Luthin, Manager — Strategic Planning
Date: July 6, 2023
Subject: Information: Draft 2023-2028 Transit Development Plan
BACKGROUND
Memorandum
Community Transit is required to adopt a six -year Transit Development Plan (TDP) that is updated
annually. Annual updates include activities, accomplishments and performance reports from the
previous year, and a refreshed six -year forecast of agency financials, service levels and capital
projects. The TDP represents an important forum for communicating goals and helps set the tone for
many agency work programs. The Washington State Department of Transportation requires transit
agencies to submit an updated plan each year.
Community Transit's 2023-2028 Transit Development Plan is focused on delivering excellent service
and building the future. The agency will do this by aligning work to the strategic priorities of attracting
and retaining customers, strengthening the employee experience, and prioritizing sustainability.
Specific initiatives that will help the agency achieve these goals include:
A significant milestone in our service growth over the next six years is aligning and connecting
bus service with Lynnwood Link light rail in 2024. The Transit Changes in 2024 and Beyond
network was adopted by the Board of Directors in early 2023 and will be implemented gradually
from late 2023 through 2026. The planned network will provide improved connections between
buses and light rail, expand the frequent service network, adjust service to changing markets
and ensures equitable access to service. 2024 also marks the launch of the new Swift Orange
Line and Swift Blue Line Extension, and this six -year planning period also prepares the way for
the future Swift Gold Line and extension of the Swift Green Line.
• The agency is planning to invest in innovative services that complement existing bus service,
and provide convenient and equitable coverage, connecting more communities with regional
service. An innovative services pilot launched in Lynnwood in 2022 and additional pilot
programs are in development in Darrington, Arlington, and Lake Stevens.
• The Zero Emissions Feasibility Study will conclude in Summer 2023. A Board recommendation
for a scaling bus fleet replacement plan and full transition horizon date will be included in the
2024 annual budget and Long Range Plan update. Additional details on these board
recommendations will be included in the Final Draft Transit Development Plan that will be
presented to the Board in September.
• The agency adopted a 5-year Security Enhancement Strategic Plan in 2022. An initial focus of
the plan is to add a security response with Transit Security Officers (TSO) who will supplement
law enforcement staffing. TSOs will provide security patrol and response activities across all
Community Transit properties, including Operating Bases, Park & Rides, Transit Centers, stops
and services.
Packet Pg. 53
6.5.a
Updated financial forecasts based on sales tax revenues, grant funding, and current economic
conditions show that the agency is in a strong position to meet its service growth and expansion
commitments.
STATUS
An overview of the draft Transit Development Plan will be presented to the Strategic Alignment and
Capital Development Committee on June 21, 2023 and again at the July 6, 2023 Board of Directors'
Meeting. The public review and comment period takes place throughout July and concludes after a
public hearing on August 3, 2023. The final draft Transit Development Plan and public comments will
be presented to the Committee at the August meeting with recommendation for adoption of the TDP at
the September 7 Board of Directors' Meeting.
Throughout the review process, comments should be directed to mailto:planupdate(a commtrans.org
BUDGETIMPACT
None. The financial assumptions and forecasts for this TDP are consistent with the 2024 Budget
development process.
RECOMMENDATION
Information only at this time.
Page 2
Packet Pg. 54
6.5.a
Consent
Agenda
0
Q.
m
o:
d
d
E
E
0
U
c
N
L
0
m
.y
0
.N
L
E
E
0
U
IL
L
0
CO
M
N
O
O
ti
O
C
N
E
s
u
0
Q
Packet Pg. 55
6.5.a
EMLco umm nnytransit Minutes
Board of Directors' Meeting
Thursday, June 1, 2023
Hybrid Meeting - 3 p.m.
Board Members Present
Council Member Kim Daughtry
City of Lake Stevens
Mayor Christine Frizzell
City of Lynnwood
Council Member Mike Gallagher
City of Brier, Board Alternate
Council Member Tom Merrill
City of Snohomish
Lance Norton
Labor Representative, non -voting
Council Member Susan Paine*
City of Edmonds, Board Alternate
Council Member Strom Peterson*
Snohomish County
Council Member Jan Schuette
City of Arlington
Board Members Absent
Mayor Joe Marine
City of Mukilteo
Council Member Jared Mead
Snohomish County
Mayor Jon Nehring
City of Marysville
Mayor Sid Roberts
City of Stanwood
Others Present**
Roland Behee
CT -Acting Chief Operating Officer
Mike Berman
CT -Chief Technology Officer -Interim
Scott Eastman
CT -Assist Manager Safety & Security
Lori Fox
CT -Finance Manager
Eunjoo Greenhouse
CT -Chief Financial Officer
Al Hendricks
CT -Legal Counsel
Ric Ilgenfritz
CT -CEO
Claude Jerde
CT -Facilities Manager
Molly Marsicek
CT -Director of Customer Experience
Kyoko Matsumoto Wright*
City of Mountlake Terrace, Board Alternate
Deb Osborne
CT -Chief of Staff
Geoff Patrick
CT -Chief Communications Office
Jacob Peltier
CT -Manager of Security & Emergency Mgmt.
Melody Smith
CT -Executive Support Specialist
Monica Spain
CT -Media Relations Specialist
Greg Stamatiou
CT -Manager of Capital Dev & Delivery
Nashika Stanbro
CT-DEI Manager
Mike Swehla
CT -Deputy Director of Maintenance
Jim Williams
CT -Deputy Director of Transportation
Rachel Woods
CT -Executive Board Administrator
Uriel Ybarra
CT -Government Relations Manager
Call to Order
Chair Schuette called the June 1, 2023 Board of Directors' meeting to order at 3 p.m. The meeting was
held in -person at 2312 W. Casino Road, Everett, WA 98204 and by Zoom. The meeting was recorded and
livestreamed.
*Attended meeting remotely
**Names of those who were confirmed as attendees are included, others who attended remotely without submitting their names a
Packet Pg. 56
6.5.a
Board of Directors' Meeting
June 1, 2023
Page 2
Roll Call of Members
The Executive Board Administrator called roll. Attendance was as noted above. A quorum was present.
Presentations
Security Program — Transit Security Officer Update
CEO Ilgenfritz provided opening comments. Roland Behee, Acting Chief Operations Officer, provided a
Transit Security Officer (TSO) program update. The security enhancement strategic plan was a multi -year
phased approach for 2022-2027. In 2023, the focus areas were the rules of conduct policy, social worker
program, and establishing the TSO program. Seven security officers were onboard and in various states of
training. The 2023 budget approved 18 TSO positions.
The TSO program was created for several reasons including increasing the feeling of safety for employees
and customers. Their training included 4 weeks in the classroom and 3-4 weeks in the field. TSOs were
one component of a multi -layered approach to reporting and responding to security incidents and would
coordinate closely with other frontline staff. The Board asked questions.
Chair's Report
Chair Schuette shared her top priority was safety and security. She supported the new TSO program and
thanked staff. The next regular Board meeting was scheduled for July 6 at 3 p.m.
Chief Executive Officer's Report
CEO Ilgenfritz provided the CEO report. Community Transit successfully secured a $3.8 million 2023-2025
State Buses and Bus Facilities Grant Program for the Lynnwood RideStore remodel. The RideStore would
be temporarily displaced during construction at the Lynnwood Transit Center. The temporary RideStore
location was a retail space across from the Ash Way Park & Ride located on 164'h ST SW.
Regarding government activities, the so-called "Blake fix" bill addressing the criminality of drug possession
was signed by the Governor in May. Deb Osborne, Chief of Staff, traveled with Economic Alliance
Snohomish County to visit the federal delegation in Washington D.C. as part of a county delegation.
A summary of recent CEO meetings included attendance at the American Public Transportation
Association (APTA) CEO conference in Houston. The Everett/Community Transit Joint Policy Committee
would meet in late June to continue the work to develop a consolidated service plan.
Overall, ridership reached a post -pandemic new high with almost 133,00 boardings. The Lynnwood Zip
service was seeing record daily ridership and the Innovative Services pilots in Lake Stevens, Darrington
and Arlington were currently compiling community feedback. The Board would receive a thorough
presentation on the Zero Emission Program at the July Board Workshop. The State Audit Entrance
meeting was held in early May and the annual audit was in progress.
The new Chief Information Officer, Charles Stearns, would join the agency on June 26 and be introduced
to the Board at the July Board meeting. An update was provided on union recall efforts. Hiring efforts
including for journey mechanics and coach operators' positions were seeing progress with a count of
344.5 and an additional 49 in the pipeline.
2
Packet Pg. 57
6.5.a
Board of Directors' Meeting
June 1, 2023
Page 3
Committee Reports
Executive Committee
Chair Schuette reported on the May 18, 2023 meeting. The CEO report was provided and included a look -
ahead at significant projects on the horizon for 2023. The Committee supported 3 Board members
attending the APTA TRANSform conference in Orlando in October. The next meeting was scheduled for
June 15 at 11:30 a.m.
Finance, Performance, and Oversight Committee
Mayor Frizzell reported on the May 18, 2023 meeting. The Committee reviewed and forwarded the
Armored Car Services RFP #2023-020 and the April 2023 monthly expenditures and payroll vouchers to
the consent agenda. The Committee reviewed the April 2023 sales tax and diesel fuel reports. CEO
Ilgenfritz shared upcoming Board business for Summer/Fall 2023. The next meeting was scheduled for
June 15 at 2 p.m.
Strategic Alignment & Capital Development Committee
Council Member Merrill reported on the May 17, 2023 meeting. The Committee received a briefing on the
2023 Committee Workplan. The next meeting was scheduled for June 21 at 2 p.m.
Consent Calendar
Council Member Daughtry moved to approve items A through H on the consent calendar.
a. Award RFP #2023-020 Armored Car Services.
b. Approve minutes of the April 20, 2023 Board Workshop.
C. Approve minutes of the May 4, 2023 Board Meeting.
d. Approve vouchers dated April 7, 2023 in the amount of $ 2,335,113.85.
e. Approve vouchers dated April 14, 2023 in the amount of $ 3,358,496.61.
f. Approve vouchers dated April 21, 2023 in the amount of $ 1,543,999.31.
g. Approve vouchers dated April 28, 2023 in the amount of $ 5,287,464.85.
h. Approve April 2023 Payroll:
i. Direct Deposits Issued, # 433919-435405 in the amount of $3,788,877.36.
ii. Paychecks Issued, # 111091 — 111155 in the amount of $64,212.56.
iii. Employer Payroll Tax Deposits in the amount of $429,084.46.
iv. Employer Deferred Compensation for IAM in the amount of $9,988.25.
Council Member Merrill seconded, and the item passed unanimously.
Board Communications
Council Member Daughtry attended the Economic Alliance Snohomish County Washington D.C. Fly -In
event. Mayor Frizzell provided and update on the new Lynnwood Transit Center garage and shared here
excitement for the arrival of light rail.
Adjourn
The meeting adjourned at 4 p.m.
#",e �Vwrk:)
Rachel Woods, Executive Board Administrator
3
Packet Pg. 58
6.5.a
Action
Items
0
Q.
m
o:
d
d
E
E
0
U
c
N
L
0
m
.y
0
.N
L
E
E
0
U
a
L
0
m
M
N
O
O
ti
O
C
N
E
M
u
0
Q
Packet Pg. 59
NEL, co n tytra Memorandum
To: Board of Directors
From: Greg Stamatiou, PMP, CCM, Director - Capital Development & Delivery
Jeremy Maine, Senior Capital Project Manager
Rhonda Wahlgren, CPPB, Sr. Procurement & SBE/DBE Specialist
Date: July 6, 2023
Subject: AWARD: ITB #2023-003, Lynnwood RideStore Remodel
BACKGROUND
The design Task Order for Community Transit's Facilities Master Plan (FMP) Phase 6 for the
Lynnwood RideStore Remodel project was awarded to Otak, Inc. on November 4, 2021 to develop
Plans and Specifications for bidding purposes. The Project consists of selective demolition, remodel,
and expansion of an existing one-story brick veneer building while working around, and in tandem
with, Sound Transit and their renovation of the adjacent Lynnwood Transit Center.
STATUS
Invitation To Bid (ITB) #2023-003 was published April 19, 2023. Bid Documents were downloaded
from our website by 33 contractors. A Pre -Bid Meeting & Site Visit was held on April 26, 2023 with
representatives from four companies attending. Three bids were received on May 25, 2023 and one
was rejected as non -responsive. Final bid results are:
Bidder
Total Bid Price
1
PCL Construction Services, Inc.
$3,849,329.00
2
Kassel & Associates, Inc.
$3,997,000.00
Lowest Bid
After reviewing all bids, staff determined that PCL Construction Services, Inc. is the lowest responsive
and responsible bidder. The IGCE for construction is $3,253,416 - $3,443,705. Although 10.6% above
the original Engineer's Estimate, the total bid price is considered fair and reasonable, and bids were
within a competitive range.
The Strategic Alignment and Capital Development Committee reviewed this item at their regular
meeting on June 21, 2023. The item was forwarded to the action agenda for the July 6, 2023 Board of
Directors' Meeting.
BUDGETIMPACT
The 2023 Budget includes adequate funds for this construction work under Project #2015.
RECOMMENDATION
That the Board of Directors authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute a contract with PCL
Construction Services, Inc. for construction of FMP Phase 6, Lynnwood RideStore Remodel, for a not -
to -exceed amount of $3,849,329.00.
6.5.a
Page 1
Packet Pg. 60
6.5.a
0
Q.
m
o:
d
d
E
E
0
U
c
N
L
0
m
Miscellaneous 0
.N
L
E
E
0
U
d
V
m
IL
L
m
0
Co
M
N
O
O
ti
O
C
N
E
s
u
0
Q
Packet Pg. 61
6.5.a
n� co muitytran
Board of Directors' Calendar of Events
July - September 2023
Thursday, July 6 Board Meeting — 3 p.m.
Wednesday, July 19 Strategic Alignment & Capital Development Committee — 2 p.m
Thursday, July 20 Finance, Performance & Oversight Committee — 2 p.m.
Tuesday, July 25* Quarterly Board Workshop — 1 p.m.
Thursday, July 27* Executive Committee — 10:00 a.m.
Thursday, August 3 Board Meeting — 3 p.m.
Wednesday, August 16 Strategic Alignment & Capital Development Committee — 2 p.m.
Thursday, August 17 Executive Committee — 11:30 a.m.
Thursday, August 17 Finance, Performance & Oversight Committee — 2 p.m.
Thursday, September 7 Board Meeting — 3 p.m.
Wednesday, September 20 Strategic Alignment & Capital Development Committee — 2 p.m.
Thursday, September 21 Executive Committee — 11:30 a.m.
Thursday, September 21 Finance, Performance & Oversight Committee — 2 p.m.
Online Meetinas Calendar
*New meeting dates
Packet Pg. 62
6.5.a
Community Transit Sales Tax Report for May 2023
Sales Tax Receipts: Dollars in Millions
May Cumulative Year to Date
17.2 16.5 16.9
79.5 79.5 81.6
0
2022 2023 2023 2022 2023 2023
Actual Budget Actual Actual Budget Actual
u
May 2023 Results Cumulative Results
May 2022 Actuals $ 17,208,510 2022 Actuals $ 79,454,445
May 2023 Budget $ 16,461,014 2023 Original Budget $ 79,465,488
May 2023 Actuals $ 16,905,187 2023 Year to Date $ 81,619,642
Comments:
* Sales tax receipts reported for the month of May 2023 reflect purchases made in March 2023.
* The growth rate for May 2023 as compared to May 2022 is-1.76%.
* The growth rate for year to date vs. prior year to date is 2.73%.
Sales Tax: Actual, Budget, and Future Year Projections
$224.6 $233.6
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Blue = Prior Year Actuals Orange = Current Year Budget Purple = Future Year Projections
Packet Pg. 63
6.5.a
Packet Pg. 64
6.5.a
System Boardings — Quarter 1
Boardings increased by 29�o from 2022 to 2-O2.i.
1.1M 1.3M 1.6M System Total
)ART
(anpool
>wift
sus
2021 2022 2023
Vanpool DART
rni
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
LL
r
Daily Boardings
o
U
22 K Fro 4K1
d
11 K +2K
CU
m
M
"
8K
+2K
o
0
O
E
V
a
Packet Pg. 65
6.5.a
System Boardings Goal
On track to hit 2023 goal or n.a million boardings
Year-end Goal 24%
.9M
of goal
achieved
2AM
Quarter 1
Bus Swift Vanpool
DART
3K
Packet Pg. 66
6.5.a
Fixed -Route Performance
Trend % Change
Boardings 4 +29%
Q1 2023
1.5M
Slightly less than the regional average year -over -year increase of 32%
Q 1 2022
iWA
Yakima Transit
54%
Ben Franklin Transit
51 %
WTA
39%
Spokane Transit
37%
Sound Transit
34%
Pierce Transit
32%
Everett Transit
32%
King County Metro
31 %
RiverCities Transit
29%
Community Transit
29%
Kitsap Transit
26%
Intercity Transit
22%
C-TRAN
20% +32%
Link Transit
17% Average
N
r
L
0
Q
0
E
E
0
U
c
CU
L
0
m
.y
0
E
0
U
r
0
CU
a
CU
0
m
M
N
0
0
a
Packet Pg. 67
6.5.a
Fixed -Route Performance
Trend
% Change
Q1 2023
Q1 2022
Boardings
+29%
1.5M
1.2M
Customers
+59%
10.5K
6.6K
(Estimated Avg Weekday)
Boardings per
+33/0 o
17.7
13.3
Revenue Hour
On -Time
+
-2.5%
75.5 /0 o
78.0% 0
Performance
points
Completed Trips
p p
+0.7%
99.0%
98.3%
point
N
r
L
O
Q
E
E
0
U
CU
0
m
.y
0
LL
r
0
U
CU
CU
0
m
M
N
tD
O
ti
O
r
C
t
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 68
6.5.a
Fixed Route
Year -Over -Year Weekly Boardings (7-day weeks only)
250K
150K
100K
50K
OK
2014 to 2011
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov D
0
Q.
m
E
0
U
c
0
m
N
r
7
0
C
LL
r
E
E
0
U
r
Y
tc
o_
L
0
m
M
N
to
0
E
0
2
a
Packet Pg. 69
6.5.a
Vanpool Performance
Boardings
Trend % Change
+51 %
Q 12023
Greater than the regional average year -over -year increase of 36%.
Ben Franklin Transit
King County Metro
Community Transit '
Intercity Transit
WTA
Spokane Transit
C-TRAN
Kitsap Transit
Pierce Transit
51%
37%
27°/>
270
21%
15% +36%
3%
Average
Q 1 2022
62%
59K
ME
N
r
L
0
Q
E
E
0
U
CU
U)
0
m
.y
0
r
E
0
U
CU
a
L
CU
0
m
M
N
w
O
0
E
0
a
Packet Pg. 70
6.5.a
Vanpool Performance
Trend
% Change
Q1 2023
Q1 2022
Boardings
+51 %
90K
59K
Customers
+50%
1.5K
990
(Total Rode)
Boardings per
�
+3/0 o
4.9
4.8
Revenue Hour
Operating Groups
+16%
253
219
Days Operated per
�
o +7/0
16.5
15.3
Group per Month
N
r
L
O
Q
E
E
0
U
CU
0
m
.y
0
L
E
0
U
CU
L
R
0
m
M
N
CD
E
a
Packet Pg. 71
6.5.a
DART Performance
Rnarding,
Trend % Change
i -1%
Q 12023
26.2 K
Less than the regional average year -over -year increase of 23%
Ben Franklin Transit
C-TRAN
Link Transit
Spokane Transit
29%
Pierce Transit
25%
Everett Transit
23%
WTA
23%
Yakima Transit
Intercity Transit
King County Metro
RiverCities Transit
Community Transit
Kitsap Transit
12%
8%
-1%
-2%
2 D%
1S%
Q 1 2022
44%
42%
+23%
Average
59%
Packet Pg. 72
6.5.a
DART Performance
Trend
% Change
Q1 2023
Q1 2022
Boardings
+
-1 %
26.2K
26.4K
Customers
+3%
2.7K
2.6K
(Total Rode)
Boardings per
+
-3/0 o
1.77
1.83
Revenue Hour
On -Time
-5%
76 o
81.3/0 0
Performance
points
.6/0
Completed Trips
-2%
97.9%
99.7%
points
N
r
L
O
Q
E
E
0
U
CU
L
0
m
.y
0
L
E
0
U
CU
L
R
0
m
M
N
tD
0
ti
0
r
c
a�
E
M
Q
Packet Pg. 73
6.5.a
DART
Year -Over -Year Weekly Boardings (7-day weeks only)
5K
901
4K ^
3K
2G«
2K '
2023
2021
1K
2020
OK
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov nPr
N
r
L
0
Q
E
0
U
E
L
m
0
Co
0
L
r
7
E
0
U
a
CU
0
m
M
N
CD
0
E
a
Packet Pg. 74
6.5.a
Summary
• Fixed -Route and vanpool boardings and customers are up compared to 2022.
• DART boardings and performance are down.
• On track to hit 2023 goal of 6.8 million boardings.
N
r
L
0
Q
0
E
E
0
U
C
CU
L
0
m
.y
0
C
LL
r
r
E
E
0
U
r
0
0
to
d
L
R
0
m
M
N
tD
O
ti
O
r
C
0
E
M
V
R
Q
Packet Pg. 75
6.5.b
Seashore Minutes 6-2-2023
The meeting was called to order at 7:33 AM.
Stephanie Pure reported that the Regional Transit Committee (RTC) will be taking up Safe Reform,
RapidRide Expansion, and Rural Services at the next meeting.
Mike Dee from the Lake Forest Park Citizens Commission provided public comment. He suggested some
bus transfers that need to be improved. Sound Transit should stop at all Metro stops. Bikes should pay
extra. Buses are not covering the first and last mile connections and Community Ride was cancelled.
The May meeting minutes were unanimously approved.
Sound Transit CEO Julie Timm presented to the group. Sound Transit is divided into five subareas.
Seashore is represented in the North King, East King, and Snohomish subareas. There are currently 25
miles of light rail. After ST2 in a few years that will go to 62 miles, and by ST3 116 miles. Stride BRT will
be quicker to the airport than Link from downtown Bellevue. Sound Transit has struggled to keep up
with cleaning of the system as well as a lack of safety employees. ST's vertical conveyances have also
been challenged. All these standards will need to be improved before opening new lines.
Link is back to 90% of pre -pandemic levels, while ST Express and Sounder continue to lag. This summer
will see the opening of Hilltop in Tacoma. East Link continues to be delayed by issues with the plinths.
Lynnwood Link is currently on schedule to open late 2024. Federal Way Link is delayed by wetland
issues. Redmond should open in 2025 with East Link. The Lynnwood garage is opening soon. Lynnwood
Link will be opened with less frequency and cars due to the East Link delays. The 1301" infill station will
open in Q2 2026. There will be some service disruption when that station opens, but most will be in the
middle of the night. Costs are rising for all construction projects across the country.
Jim Hammond from Shoreline asked about the integration of other modes with rail. With climate change
we are very interested in shared use mobility hubs. A—ST partners with our service partners to create a
network but must stay within our budget. We must have multimodal connectivity.
CM Goldman from Lake Forest Park said he preferred more frequent service with three car trains rather
than four car trains. He also suggested keeping the 522 going to Roosevelt until Lynnwood Link is fully
operational.
CM McConnell from Shoreline said she has been using the light rail from Northgate and doesn't like the
airport connection. She doesn't believe that people should have to pay for parking. It discourages transit
ridership. A —We are using more security and fare ambassadors to provide information to riders. As for
parking, ST is looking at a paid parking model soon. Carpools and lower income with be charged less.
This is coming to the board this fall.
Chris Arkills of King County asked if opening an East Link starter line would affect the opening date of
Lynnwood Link. A —they can't open at the same time, but it shouldn't affect Lynnwood Link opening, but
it will be at a lower level of service.
CM Paine -Donovan from Mountlake Terrace that a public restroom is needed at the station there. The
city is disappointed in this. A—Boardmember Baker of Kenmore is a huge advocate for bathrooms on
our system. We need to make some bathroom facilities available to our riders.
Packet Pg. 76
6.5.b
CM Kassover said Lake Forest Park is affected by 522 BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) construction. She asked for
more open and honest communication between ST and the city. A —we will work to improve
communication.
Tom Pearce from WSDOT reported on Revive 1-5. It is an aging structure. Repairs are not fully funded.
Tom Collins, the project engineer said that the entire project was not funded by the legislature, so
WSDOT is prioritizing urgent needs first like the Ship Canal bridge. The project has been split into two.
The southbound portion and northbound ramps are the first project. The new project will go out to bid
in October and start construction next summer.
CM Kugler of Kenmore asked if there is a map of the project to be constructed. A —the Revive 1-5
website is linked in the chat. The good news is that the Ship Canal bridge repairs will not happen during
the World Cup.
CM Kassover said she was concerned about the legislature didn't fund these repairs. A—Azim Sheikh-
Taheri answered that the legislature prioritized new projects over preservation. We got about 40% of
the preservation dollars we requested.
CM Paine asked about the fish passage at McAleer Creek. A —it will be completed in 2024-25. Bridges
over the creek will require it to be lined in a pipe in places.
CM Paine -Donovan mentioned the complex interchange at the King -Snohomish line and stressed the
need for pedestrian infrastructure. A —we don't have funding for pedestrian improvements, but the
design builder may include them. The legislature also mandated complete streets but didn't fully fund
them.
Stephanie Pure of King County Metro asked about the transit impacts of the project. A —One positive is
that Lynnwood Link will now be open before the 1-5 work and Community Transit will be discontinuing
commuter bus service to Seattle. The ramps at 45t" and 50t" will hopefully not be closed at the same
time. We will be constantly working with our transit partners. Stewart and Mercer are busy ramps, but
there is also an express lane option for those two.
CM Kassover asked if they were working with the Port to reroute truck traffic. A —we are coordinating
with the Port, but it is unclear what we will be able to do.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 AM.
Attendees:
Amanda Pleasant -Brown, KC Metro
Angela Kugler, Kenmore City Council
Azim Sheikh-Taheri, WSDOT
Chris Arkills, KCM Government Relations
Chris Eaves, Seattle DOT (Good morning).
Doris McConnell, Shoreline CC
Elsa Brown, Regional Affairs at the City of Seattle
Erik Ashlie-Vinke, Sound Transit
James Randolph, DM Woodinville
Jeffrey Perrigo, DPW, Lake Forest Park
Jim Hammond, City of Shoreline
Packet Pg. 77
6.5.b
Julie Timm, Sound Transit
Larry Goldman, CM, LFP
Matthew Kenna, WSDOT, Planning and Policy Analyst
Mike Dee, Lake Forest Park Citizens' Commission, LFPCitizensCommission2@Gmail.Com , (206)-607-
9409
Nilu Jenks, Seattle City Council D5 candidate
Nytasha Walters, City of Shoreline staff
Rory Paine -Donovan, Mountlake Terrace CM
Stephanie Pure, King County Metro
Susan Paine, Edmonds Council
Tom Pearce, WSDOT communications
Tom Collins, WSDOT
Public Comment:
(Sent Fri 61212023 7:31 AM)
Howdy Mike Dee here,
Hi,
Here is sone Public Comments I would like to submit.
Thanks,
Mike Dee
"My potential "Public Comment" writing & thinking here:
Having the Required- First Mile & Last Mile Connections in multiple North King County cities, continues
to be a challenge and issue for our local Bus Service Providers.
For Lake City riders, simply having the Sound Transit buses stop at King County Metro Stops in Lake City,
Seattle also, would be an easy solution, that is very important, to connect riders to other bus
connections and options, and also limit the distances to these Bus Stops for people.
If I understand and recall this correctly:
On the weekends, King County Metro buses, do not continue past Lake City, Seattle (they End Service at
Fred Meyer's in Lake City), meaning all cities down the line on SR-522, don't even get Bus Service from
those King County Metro Buses, including Lake Forest Park, Kenmore, Bothell, and Woodinville.
The fare amount for King County (K.C.) Metro Buses are lower than Sound Transit's fare amount. ($2.75
vs. $3.25).
K.C. Metro Bus Drivers also give and observe paper bus transfers, that allow the purchaser / holder to
continue to ride, board other KC Metro Buses, and not have to pay again, during the 1.5-2 hour window
after purchase.
For Sound Transit Riders without ORCA-One Regional Card for All, Cards, like those paying by Cash, they
are expected to pay for each bus they board, even if within the one & a half to 2 hour window, that the
paper transfer on King County Metro would have covered the cost of the bus for.
Packet Pg. 78
6.5.b
A cash rider may have to pay for two bus systems, King County Metro and Sound Transit, for their trip,
more than doubling the cost. ($2.75 + $3.25)
The Lake Forest Park Bus routes only cover certain parts of the city, and out of the 2 Community
Connection Solutions identified in 2015, as needed to address this concern, and finally put in place in
2019 ?
The Shoreline / Lake Forest Park Community Ride (Community Ride — A reservation -based service that
travels within a specific service area based on where people want to go.) option was Suspended on
March 20th, 2021.shoreline-lake-forest-park-community-ride.ashx (kingcounty.gov)
Kenmore has limited Bus options to get around their city, but part of the city has the Metro Flex option
Bothell also has limited options, and also a little bit of Metro Flex options.
Woodinville has a challenge to get additional buses, and does not appear to be serviced by Metro Flex.
Woodinville's Bus Access Challenges were so great, that our People Experiencing Homelessness, by
Surviving in Tents, the Non -Profit, Camp United We Stand, could not happily consider a church that was
offering to host us, as a preferred site, due to the long distances from not only Bus Service, but even
Shopping options to get basics like food, probably meaning that those that live near there, basically live
in a Food Dessert, without even Public Transit, to help them access food.
Metro Flex - King County Metro - King County
OK, I will stop for now."
4
Packet Pg. 79
Aurora Ave/E Line Project
Seashore Transportation Forum
July 7, 2023
ka a
King County Seattle
�I1 Department of
METRO Transportation
Packet Pg. 80
6.5.c
Presentation Overview
Project Background
Corridor Issues and Opportunities
Aurora Ave Vision
Project Timeline and Phasing
Community Engagement
Next Steps
kgKing CountyI\ Seattle
METRO 0PacketPg.81
Project Background and Overview
Joint agency project between SDOT
and King County Metro
Planning study to define long-range
vision and cross sections for Aurora Ave
N with emphasis on safety, mobility,
and accessibility
Focus on safety for vulnerable users
Identify priority spot locations
Identify potential transit service
improvements and connections as well
as safety and security upgrades
6.5.c
gKingCountySeattle
METRO Q,I,N
� Packet Pg. 82
6.5.c
Aurora Ave I Issues and Opportunities
% Included in Seattle's High Injury Network for traffic collisions
WRapidRide E Line is one of the busiest frequent transit routes in the region
I• High priority for sidewalks and pedestrian crossing upgrades with 30+ blocks of missing
N sidewalks and long gaps between controlled crossings
c5� No bike facilities on Aurora and few bike connections across Aurora
MW Designated major truck street with business access needs along Aurora
Lack of greening and tree canopy
I
MDrainage, limited right of way, business access challenges
kgKing County I\ Seattle
METRO �' Packet Pg. 83
6.5.c
Draft Aurora Ave Vision
• Is safe for all users and has no serious or fatal traffic
We envision an c°`l'S'°ns
• Has accessible, rapid, and reliable bus service
Aurora Corridor .Serves mobility needs as part of the City's multi -modal
that: transportation system
• Supports active street uses and the City's growth strategy
and land use vision
* Encourages zero and low -emission transportation options
and incorporates environmentally sustainable features
5 LQ King Count0
yII Seattle
METRO Packet Pg. 84
6.5.c
Past Aurora Ave Improvement Efforts
Longstanding priority for pedestrian
and transit improvements
WSDOT published SR 99 Route
Development Plan in 2003
2009 Aurora Traffic Safety Corridor
Short-term, low-cost treatments
Education and enforcement efforts
Small-scale spot improvements during
recent corridor repaving in 2019
WSDOT grant secured for planning
study in 2021
Aurora Ave N at N 76t" St
kgKing Count0
yI\ Seattle
METRO l Packet Pg. 85
6.5.c
Project Phasing and Schedule
We are
here!
• Initial community member and
stakeholder outreach
• Establishing interagency partnerships
• Data collection along the corridor
• Use community input and
corridor/transit data to continue to
develop preferred design
• Identify project risks and
opportunities
•Identify and define design constraints
with partner agencies
• Stakeholder design workshops to
develop corridor and transit concept
altcrnatixioc
• Document preferred concept design
• Design near -term safety spot
improvements to 90%
gKingCounty I\ Seattle
I Packet Pg. 86
METRO 011"
6.5.c
Phase 1 Community
Engagement
Digital Engagement:
Online survey (2,082 responses)
Social media, blog, web, listsery
Multicultural media and digital campaign
Parental engagement
In -Person Engagement:
Pop-up events
Door-to-door outreach with > 100
businesses
One-on-one community group and CL
conversations
Bus signs along corridor
Project area ethnicity and survey participation ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 79.6
896
2 or More Races 696
01A
Other Race Alone 6
8.0°,L
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander C)D,6
Asian Alone 13%
Mi 149d
American Indian and Alaska Native 1%
2.0°,4
Black or African American . 41A
4%
White alone
13%
0% 10% 20% 30'6 40'6 50% 64% 70% 80%
■ Project Area ■ Survey Participation
Travel mode for people traveling everyday more than once a day on
Aurora Ave
11% 7%
■Bicycle
896
■Bus
■ Car/truck/delivery/or other
motor vehicle
Other
■ Walk
gKingCounty I\ Seattle
METRO 1' Packet Pg. 87
6.5.c
Phase 1 Community
Engagement- What We Heard
Top concerns:
Social concerns (crime, personal
safety)
Physical
walk
safety for people who
Collision reduction and general
infrastructure
Social concerns, lack
connectivity, bus stop
accessibility identified
concerns for transit
of
locations, and
as top
Most avoided pedestrian crossings
located in north end of corridor
What other safety improvements or changes woutd you Like to see
along the Aurora Ave N/State Route 99 corridor that are not
mentioned above?
9A% 4%
IE
.20.6%
22.7%
.5%
■ Social concerns (personal safety, criminal activity, ■ Collision reduction
homelessness, sex workers, enforcement, etc.} Mower speed, signal improvements, etc }
■ Transit Improvements and Connections
(cle3rwr u615,/1rantit slatiow.; rnm@ Iws
connectivity antmobility/bus lanes, etc.)
■ Pedestrian Safety iind Ac[Cssibility
(trpsSing, protCtted sidewalks, fnalbridgc!,
overpass}pedestrian runnel, etc.(
Bike Safety and Mobility
(Protected barrier, bike lanes, etc.)
■ General Infrastructure Safety
(visibility, signs, lights, lane use, etc.)
0 Other (urban plannirsg, recreation areas« etc.I
■ N/A tdid not provide input)
gKingCounty I\ Seattle
METRO 1' PacketPg.88
0
a
d
LY
E
0
U
CU
0
w
0
4-
L
m
I
a�
0
t
ru
to
I
M
N
N
r`
ti
r
R
r
a
Phase 2 Engagement
Goal: Engage residents, businesses,
and people who travel along the
corridor in the co -creation of concept
designs
Held series of ""participatory
workshops" with populations
underrepresented in phase 1
outreach
Hosted six intensive collaborative
design workshops with key
stakeholder groups
6.5.c
v
N
n O
E
v -A-AW
gKingCountyI\ Seattle
METRO �l Packet Pg. 89
6.5.c
Aurora Ave Project -Next Steps
Compile feedback we heard through
design workshop into series of
concept design for corridor
Conduct analysis and traffic modeling
to validate feasibility of concepts
Solicit input from community on
preferred concept design options
later this year
Implement safety priority near -term
spot improvements
gKingCountySeattle
METRO Q,I,N
� Packet Pg. 90
0
E
0
U
L
R
0
w
0
4-
m
L
0
U)
M
N
O
N
ti
a
r
44
•" - � '" 't �,� <. � _. ::� . � 4 ter � � u
Zr
r 5
� � r
-
S
y c,
, At
/ :?'£amt'R(♦ `s ;S�k, '�. x .. r�--"F .`{ r 'f -0{{ ::'kh gyp" k.. / ,r
�le
•' :f iY'
t n
,r
,
i
F .
a
1
Contactour-=r: ec -",.Tea M .
aurorastud @sgov 2 05-620
�. y
11 QQNMiifnn SEATTLE
loI'
t
x
6.5.d
ZACK HOWARD
iDOT Complete Streets
in King County
Seashore Transportation Forum
July 7, 2023
SNO-KING COMPLETE STREETS TEAM LEAD
Packet Pg. 92
6.5.d
Working togethor
implement your community's vision
• Share WSDOT's Complete Streets priorities
• Offer opportunities to work together so
highway corridors will support all modes safely
and connect to planned networks
• Support your vision for highway corridors, as
identified in local comprehensive plans
E
+ Whatcom O
San Juar V
S 7ah Skagit
Ul-
Clallam
2024 Due December 31"
M �
N
L
$nOlIQR115h M O
Douglas
to
Kittitas O
Ke
rrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Q
0
Yakima �
Columbia
M
N
G
N
Skamania Bent 9 Walla Walla
N
16-
G
Ago
R
M
o
�1 nr�
2025 Due June 30- 0 202G Due June 30- 2027 Due
June
a+
C
Ar Starred counties are partially planning under the Growth Management Act 0
E
N
Q.
E
Goal: We want to be aligned with your vision- so we safely and efficiently meet the y
needs of all those traveling on or across the state highways
a
Packet Pg. 93
.fir
r
Complete Streets are ... A J. -P.
blip
,x
I
Planning, designin. :, y "
budding, operating, a l
rYlaintaining streets
Providing
safe access
fGr all
a people
Ulu •
Safer
People
Safer
Vehicles
SAFE
t SYSTEM
APPROACH
Post -ems
cNe
Safer
Roads
Safer
Speeds
WSDOT
3
6.5.d
Complete Streets in Washington State
Adopted Complete Streets Policies (a subset)
Mill Creek
Te = _
Edmafld
rrw��d. N-Drrh Creek
- Malt
Ki7��tni NIaurl .=•,E?TerraCE?
Bothell
-- .1❑ Fore _= - go Both I,ai ' JS�'l `vf'•sl
D eiff t _.ram"" Kenmore Cork,3ge Gak-p Du,*,' Duvall
u '
f 5 Fxprps�, �i ti rah[ 0,
wazersher
Kirkland 'r nd F.-r `°'-'-- `-II I-
-- Redr*,', Red mo A Hill
} Forest
YC Car OE Carpat'�"
3a nd . _ Bel I Bellevue
` 53Y11iT1 �itTll3h
o-
Issaqua" iovnt +
5noi&' Snoqualmie �Ot f ff
Packet Pg. 95
6.5.d
Complete Streets
Requirement
Added to Chapter 47.24 RCW - CITY STREETS
AS PART OF STATE HIGHWAYS
Purpose: "(1) In order to improve the safety,
mobility, and accessibility of state highways,
it is the intent of the legislature that the
department must incorporate the principles
of complete streets with facilities that
provide street access with all users in mind,
including pedestrians, bicyclists, and public
transportation users, notwithstanding the
provisions of RCW 47.24.020 concerning
responsibility beyond the curb of state
rights -of -way."
Applies to "state transportation projects
starting design on or after July 1, 2022, and
that are $500,000 or more"
Applying Complete
Streets to Projects
Projects:
• over $500,000 beginning design on or
after J u ly 1, 2022
— in incorporated cities,
— in areas where active
transportation gaps have been
identified in WSDOT or local plans,
OR
— in overburdened communities
Allowable Complete Streets solutions may
include reallocating space within the
existing area occupied by transportation
facilities, including reduction in the size and
number of vehicle lanes and reduction in
vehicle speeds.
Packet Pg. 96
• • �, 6.5.d
Complete
_ E
Streets �-
Requirement
"[M]ust: (a) Identify - ri N
those locations on • • o
state rights -of -way ti
that do not have a - • - • - �- o
complete and
0
Americans with co
disabilities act
o
accessible sidewalk ` = - •=rr `°�.�` �='.
or shared -use path,"=`
a
fkk AarPacket Pg. 97
No Bike facilities; {t
•.ti► � 1111
NOT COMPLETE
Bike Lanes
+q r .y Jib y X d
err - � �� •.� �,..�
7*
- -
_ 4
COMPLETE
ldmbl
�WWWSDOT
Complete =*
Streets
quirement
"[M]ust: (a) Identify those
locations on state rights -
of -way ... that have such NOT COMPLETE
facilities on a state route
within a populationBufferer? "are7d se
center that has a posted
speed in excess of 30
miles per hour and no =
buffer or physical17
separation from
vehicular traffic for
pedestrians and
bicyclists"
a
NOZ
6.5.d
Yr i4E
m
E
O
U)
O
m
0
0
0
M
N
r
a N
r r
�' • (D
L
r f
O
U)
M
. W
f .s
E
Q
Packet Pg. 99
6.5.d
Complete
Streets
RequireML
"[M]ust: (a) Identify those
locations on state rights -
of -way ... that have a
design that hampers
the ability of motorists
to see a crossing
pedestrian with
sufficient time to stop
given posted speed
limits and roadway
configuration;"
155walK V ISID1iity
27
e
E
E
O
N
O
m
d
N
0
ti
0
0
M
'N
O
N
L
0
M
U)
CU
CD
E
CO
Packet Pg. 100
6.5.d
*+lete Require
"(b) Consult with local jurisdictions to confirm existing and planned active
transportation connections along or across the location; identification of
connections to existing and planned public transportation services, ferry
landings, commuter and passenger rail, and airports; the existing and planned
facility type(s) within the local jurisdiction that connect to the location; and the
potential use of speed management techniques to minimize crash exposure
and severity;"
Level Of Traffic Stress
1
T-
2
3 Y
Ev rett Snoh.r„kh
— q �Q
1 r
reap Stie r
RellevJue `
Kind
l
Tacoma
Pi
Link Light Rail
Everett
Mukilteo�
Mariner
Sounder Rail
Infill Station or
Lynnwood
Added Parking.
Edmonds i J Bothell
Improvements
f
•
Shoreline Woodinville
Bus Rapid
Transit (BRT)
Northgate
Redmond
Bailer Kirkland
UW Sammamish
•
Bellevue
Seattle
West Mercer
Seattle Island
•
Issaquah
Burien a Renton
SeaTaclAirport • Tukwila
Angle Lake
Des Moines Kent
Federal
Tacoma Way
Auburn
Tcc +'%
Tacoma Fife Sumner
South Tacoma
Dome •
Lakewood Puyallup
A Tillicu�
N DuPont
E
Everett
Si 1,
levue
•
coy u
~A
porn, y
E
0
tU
L
M
O
Cal
ti
O
ti
O
M
N
O
N
L
O
L
V)
R
a)
C
O
c
N
E
U
C
W
V
M
r�
Q
Packet Pg. 101
6.5.d
plete 9 - Require •PI
"(c) Adjust the speed limit to a lower speed with appropriate modifications to
roadway design and operations to achieve the desired operating speed in
those locations where this speed management approach aligns with local
plans or ordinances, particularly in those contexts that present a higher
possibility of serious injury or fatal crashes occurring based on land use
context, observed crash data, crash potential, roadway characteristics that are
likely to increase exposure, or a combination thereof, in keeping with a safe
system approach and with the intention of ultimately eliminating serious and
fatal crashes;"
40
MPH
Y out 01 IU peaeslrions survive,
z� wi vi iu peae5mons survive.
Only 1 out of 10 pectesfrians survive.
Source: Target Zero 2019
Packet Pg. 102
6.5.d
Complete c - Y&%&%#s Requirement
"(d) Plan, design, and construct facilities providing context sensitive solutions
that contribute to network connectivity and safety for pedestrians, bicyclists,
and people accessing public transportation and other modal connections, such
facilities to include Americans with disabilities act accessible sidewalks or
shared -use paths, bicyclist facilities, and crossings as needed to integrate the
state route into the local network."
Packet Pg. 103
6.5.d
Basic LTS
General Linear LT5 no Sidewalk f no narked bike lane / with or without shoulder
La n es AADT
<=20
25
30
35
40
45
50+
1thru lane per direction (or 1 lane one-way street)
0-750
1
1
3
4
4
4
4
751-1500
1
2
3
4
4
4
4
IL501-300C
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
3000+
2
3
3
4
4
4
4
2 thru lanes per direction
0-6000
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
>6000
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
3+thru lanes per direction,Any
ADT
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
ConventionaI Bike Lanes (5'
or greater)
Lanes AADT <=20
25
30
35
40
45 50+
1 thru lane per direction (or 1 lane one-way street)
0-750
1
2
2
4
4
— —
751-1500
1
2
2
4
4
4 —
1501-3000
1
2
2
4
4
4 —
3000+
2
2
2
4
4
. —
2 thru lanes per direction
0-6000
2
2
3
4
4
4 —
>6000
3
3
3
4
4
— —
3+thru lanes per direction
An AUT
1 3
3
4
4
4
4 —
w
E
E
0
U
0
m
a�
0
0
ti
0
M
N
O
N
L
0
t
Cn
c
0
r
r
c
0
E
a�
a
E
CO
U
r
C
0
E
0
a
Packet Pg. 104
6.5.d
LTS and active traveler types
All riders
Most riders Few riders 1% of riders
LTS 3
Packet Pg. 105
Level of Traffic Stress - Pedestrian
A ik it
All people Most people Feuer people
LTS .3
1 of people
6.5.d
E
E
0
tU
c
N
L
0
m
0
r-
0
I-
0
M
N
O
N
N
L
0
L
U)
m
d
U)
C
d
E
Q
E
U)
U
c
W
E
t
ca
Q
Packet Pg. 106
6.5.d
Level of Traffic Stress—WSDOT Characterization
Characteristics
air
LTS 1
419P
LTS 2
A
F �LTS 3 1
9F
LTS 4M
Stress
minimal/none
low
moderate
high
Required attentiveness
minimal/none
low
moderate
high
(to traffic)
Unsupervised
all ages and
8 years and up
adult
adult
Suitability
abilities
Accessibility
all ages and
possible
likely
presents barrier to
abilities
limitations
limitations
wheeled mobility
for wheeled
for wheeled
device use
mobility device
mobility device
Traffic conditions
low speeds
moderate
higher speeds
highest speeds
and volumes if
speeds and
and volumes
and volumes,
facilities are near
volumes
typically multilane
traffic
roadways
w
E
E
0
U
c
N
R
0
m
0
0
0
Cl)
N
(D
N
L
0
M
U)
cu
0
E
U)
U
r
c
M
V
a
Packet Pg. 107
� r
• •
• •
•
CS Step #2
CS Step #3
CS Step #4 r
CS Step #5
March 2023:
April 2023:
May 2023:
June 2023:
July 2023:
August 2023 - ? 14
WSDOT/Monroe
WSDOT/Monroe
WSDOT/Monroe
WSDOT/Monroe
WSDOT/Monroe
2023/24:
Meeting #1
Meetings 2 & 3
Meetings 4 & 5
Meeting #6
Meeting #7
WSDOT/Monroe
•Introduce WSDOT CS
-Develop Alternatives
•Review Alternatives
*Community
*Select Preferred
Meetings as needed
Legislation &
-Develop Evaluation
Analysis & Trade -Offs
Engagement
Alternative
*Develop Design
Framework
Criteria
*Develop Community
*Develop Community
•Set Objectives &
Outreach Plan and
Engagement
Timeline
Materials
Summary
•Review Existing
Conditions (Data)
*Review Local Context
SnoKing Complete
SnoKing Complete
SnoKing Complete
SnoKing Complete
SnoKing Complete
Streets Team
Streets Team
Streets Team
Streets Team
Streets Team
Briefing
L
Collaboration
Collaboration
0
Concurrence
Concurrence at
1
30%, 60%, & 90
WW WSDOT
6.5.d
120305C: SR 203/NE 124th St Vic to US 2 - Paving With Exceptions
0 -
#1
s.
�h
a
IN Hill S! in
'd 2
2
S,c•I vo',.nbia St
g 'N -remcm Si
A 4103up 31 _
.o
F
N
���gitie PI�
City of Monroe in
` Snohomish County
1
State Route 203
E 9tre,tt,5t MP 23.73 to MP
N 24.17
BURS' Sr
E dill St �� P�
Project is located
N
w near the downtown
area from
F•en oir G1 McDougall Street to
US 2
Mz Daugall 5 t
r
Packet Pg. 109
R 2U3 (Monroe) - Existing Active Transr
7 r
fGlobal Heatmap
- Ik
Hut Blue P.,P6 G-y Red
Pill
O Map Styles
Activity Type
All &b
Heat Dpacity
Layers
Map L.bel.
• ' � � �.. Dark Light St..d.ird
Q if "f R• ,f-
i�
o. • �. . -�. _ 7 , xI ` r1 -mow d'4.
I �
D�soovef how the heatmap was built.. m
Learn how Strava Metro can help your
• / h w a
�i - � . . ` ' � .tip .,., -" ' ' • � 1
• m ` � � � fit. -/
/
00
Learn about heatmap updates.
WSDOT
• 9
6.5.d
City of Monroe = Active Transportation Plans
Figure 6; Existing Walking and Biking Facilities Fi ure.'LAMalkin and BiVi Priarit Network
r-tc.w�w�
aexdkluNiuxTrrl y r'4
&ryelrrPe,lesU�n �4e[ommc,Y�ry,e< i'.. '
--- Gf" Trii
M
9 g 9 Y
I :da'JNy
Uma,
e�ea,
�.rRr', xuti r
~ / I
— 8lsyc4rl{dnban +�uar*+ti del Qom � �� � i
-•- GraNel imil r � �.�. .- .-'
w 0
0
0
�j M
N
O
N
c
E
cC
Q
Packet Pg. 111
6.5.d
Coming
your jurisdiction!
Active transportation
✓Feasibility studies
✓Corridor studies
E
E
O
tU
0
0
M
N
O
N
N
L
O
U)
M
0
✓Com rehensive plans
p
✓And more!
U
c
E
a
Packet Pg. 112
6.5.d
For more information:
• We can provide technical assistance to facilitate the development of Complete
Street alternatives that will enhance safety and support connections on and across our
highways
• We can assist your community as you define the needs and expectations along highway
corridors that will inform your Comprehensive Planning
• Resources on our Complete Streets webpage:
https://wsdot.wa.gov/construction-planning/complete-streets
Please reach out to:
Zack Howard, howardz(a-)-wsdot.wa.gov
Complete Streets Planning Lead, King and Snohomish Counties
Packet Pg. 113
PORT COMMISSION OF THE PORT OF EDMONDS MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
(Via Zoom, Hybrid Meeting) June 12, 2023
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
Steve Johnston, President
Jim Orvis, Vice President
Jay Grant, Secretary
Janelle Cass (Via Zoom)
a
as
David Preston
m
as
STAFF PRESENT
E
E
Angela Harris, Executive Director
0
v
Brandon Baker, Director of Marina Operations
Tina Drennan, Manager of Finance and Accounting
L
M0
W
OTHERS PRESENT
Jordan Stephens, Port Attorney
p
Dave Teitzel, Edmonds City Council
N
Frank Chmelik, Attorney
N
r
m
Mike Quinn, Mayor of Woodway
y
CALL TO ORDER
President Johnston called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
FLAG SALUTE
All those in attendance participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag.
WELCOME OF NEW COMMISSIONER
Commissioner Johnston welcomed new Commissioner Janelle Cass, who was sworn in on June 5th
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COMMISSIONER ORVIS MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDAAS PRESENTED. COMMISSIONER
PRESTON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
CONSENT AGENDA
C'.nmmiccinnar errant ackPrl to mill the Mav R1 iniR MInI1tPC (Itam Al nn the ['nncant Ananrla
Packet Pg. 114
771 point of order, Port Attorney Stephens advised that the best time to pull an item from the Consent 6.5.e
Agenda is when the Commission is approving the meeting agenda.
On Page 2, Question 3, 4th line, Commissioner Grant asked that the word "he" be changed to
"Commissioner Grant" to add clarity.
COMMISSIONER ORVIS MOVED THAT THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA BE
APPROVED TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
A. APPROVAL OF MAY 31, 2023 MEETING MINUTES, AS MODIFIED
B. APPROVAL OF PAYMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $441,671.29
COMMISSIONER PRESTON SECONDED THE MOTION
Commissioner Cass indicated she would abstain from voting on the minutes since she was not at the
May 31st meeting. Port Attorney Stephens explained that a commissioner can vote on approving the
minutes even if they weren't in attendance at the meeting. However, they also have the option to
abstain from voting.
Port Attorney Stephens suggested that Commissioners can notify staff of scrivener errors in the
minutes prior to the meeting so that staff can make the changes and submit revised minutes. If it
doesn't work out time -wise to do that, they can incorporate the requested change in the initial motion.
THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0, WITH COMMISSIONER CASS ABSTAINING.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Executive Director Harris read the following comment from Darrol Haug into the record as follows:
"At your May 31 meeting, Commissioner Orvis made interesting remarks about housing. I would like to
make a few comments about his remarks and offer additional comments and ideas. His remarks were
realistic, and a key takeaway was it may be more cost effective to build housing than to use our various
institutions for housing. When I spoke to you last, I offered some ideas of how the Port could provide
added help to the community and to our city government. There are some seeds in these comments
that if planted and cared for could help further engage the role of Port not only in the Port District but in
the community as a whole.
Our education system needs to better prepare our kids for today's economy. Jobs and income to be
successful in the housing market. Performances below grade level for reading and math together with
nrarluatinn rates in the mirl 80 nercent rin not nrenare mir kirls fnr niiality wnrk_ As part of the j Packet Pg. iL5j
�' __-'_'__-._.. . ____- ... _.._ ....- -- r-' --''- _'- '' -- 1 ' -1-- - - -.. '- _'- ' -' _I-' ----- J _'-"_" ._ 1-
6.5.e
facilities team, we have recommended to the School Board two things. Both recommendations are
proven ways to improve outcomes including graduation rates.
• Moving 6th grade students to middle school with 7th and 8th grade students would put ESD on par
with most other Puget Sound districts. Data shows this will improve graduation rates.
• More importantly, the facilities team has recommended moving to universal preschool (Ages 3-4).
Data clearly shows preschool improves reading and math scores AND graduation rates. ESD has 3,000
kids in the age group and only 400 go to district -provided preschool. Yes, parents with resources do
send their kids to preschool, but many kids are left behind this vital education step. The new capital
gain tax on upper income folks will generate $500 million for early learning. ESD's share, if equally
divided, will be $10 million or more than $3,000/kid. Local resources will be needed to fully fund
universal preschool.
Further reform is needed to provide a path for each kid to secure gainful employment upon graduation
and that will be key for providing grads with the income necessary to secure housing. The Port has no
direct role in either of these items, but individually, your support could be helpful.
Commissioner Orvis' point is we need to find ways to increase the housing supply. Traditional market -
based strategies do not adequately increase the housing supply. As a community, we need to sort out
how we can increase the supply and variety of housing. To increase housing supply, we may need to
think about various forms of subsidy. First, we need to understand the cost elements that go into our
current housing. Here are some of the major cost elements:
1. Building materials: Often expressed as cost/square foot and varies based on finished quality.
2. Land. In the Port District (generally the bowl) land represents 60-75% of assessed value. Other parts
of Edmonds outside of the Port District land represents 35-40% of assessed value.
3. Permits: Measured in $1,000's.
4. Mitigation fees: To contribute to parks and infrastructure. Measured in $1,000's.
For multi -family or mixed -use, additional studies may be needed. Traffic studies for example. The Port
O
has some incredibly good data for the 345 homes that were planned for the Harbor Square
r_
�°
Development. That data could be updated to further help with this sort of analysis. Finding free or
heavily -subsidized land and eliminating fees would reduce the finish price of a housing unit by more
than 50%! The current Multi -Family Tax Exemption plan does little to create affordable housing. It only
Q
reduces a few units to a rate below market rate. More leverage or creativity is needed to produce
affordable housing and more variety of housing. Accessory Dwelling Units, while interesting, do little to
truly increase variety and supply.
We may have parcels of land that are currently underutilized. Although not in the Port District, Five
Packet Pg.
Corners and Firdale Villaqe would be examples. The Wade James Theater is a very good exa
IL6J
underutilized land. That site is 2.2 acres, and the theater takes only a small portion of the land. As par
of some work for the Economic Development Commission, I asked a developer to outline a proposal to
save and upgrade the theater, create "affordable" units, provide units for 55+ folks and provide other
units, as well. They came up with a concept of totally renovating the theater, adding 5,000 square feet
to the space, building a 5-story complex, with no views at stake. Their proposal included 150 units, 32
truly affordable, 8 units for 55+ and the rest at market rates. They would buy the current complex at the
current market value, a little under $2 million.
Elephant in the room is the new state law dealing with single-family homes and other strategies to
increase density. But the Grownup in the room may be the Port! You can help change the discussion to
not only the numbers of housing units needed but the type and cost. Updating your Harbor Square
data and creating some current data associated with the cost elements 1 through 4 above would do a
great job of community service. The interactive work the Port did with the public input for Harbor
Square could be done again, but not targeted for a revised Harbor Square development, but for
creating some model developments for the future. The Port could play a role in facilitating the
development of such data and modeling. You should carefully discuss how you may be of assistance to
the community."
There were no other public comments.
PORT OF EDMONDS PROJECT SUMMARY
Executive Director Harris said the purpose of this discussion is to review current Port projects. At the
recommendation of Attorney Frank Chmelik, who will be presenting at the Commission/staff training
meeting on June 20th, she will add in the elements of Commissioner engagement for each of the
projects.
• North Portwalk and Seawall Reconstruction. Executive Director Harris reported that this project
includes both the seawall reconstruction and the new Portwalk surface, with updated railing, improved
w
0
lighting, new dock safety gates, public art, updated landscaping, and new and updated public plazas.
c
a
The Commission provided input into the project design starting in 2018 through 2022, and 30% design
was completed on May 27, 2021 and 60% design on August 20, 2021. The project was submitted to
m
E
the City of Edmonds for design review in April. The City provided some minor comments and
r
Q
clarifications that they are in the process of responding to, and they are hoping to complete design
review within the next six to eight weeks. The original target was to have the project at 90% design by
October, and she would double check with the contractor to see if that is still the plan.
Executive Director Harris emphasized that, at this time, any minor aesthetic changes would require
them to resubmit to the City for design review. This could put the project back several months,
Packet Pg. 117
permit fees would be required. Any major changes would require restarting the Joint Aquatic Resourc
Permit Application (JARPA). Commissioner Preston asked if even very minor aesthetic changes would
require additional design review. Commissioner Johnston answered that very small tweaks might be
allowed, but anything else would require additional design review.
Executive Director Harris reported that they are still waiting to hear back on the JARPA application,
which was submitted over 18 months ago. They have completed the State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA) requirement and are currently waiting for design review. The Shoreline Permit application was
submitted in April, and they are currently in the comment phase. They are waiting to submit
applications for Building Permits and Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) until the project is closer to
construction, as both permits are only valid for two years.
Commissioner Johnston asked if the Port has received any feedback from the consultant as to
progress on approval of the JARPA Permit. Executive Director Harris answered that she hasn't heard
any update, but she would check at the next meeting with the consultants. Commissioner Grant
suggested they should have some expectation as to the timeline for the JARPA Permit. If the time
drags beyond that point, they could start having someone like the Chair of the Commerce Committee
write a letter.
Executive Director Harris advised that, as the project gets closer to construction, the team will identify
milestones. Pending funding, permitting, etc., they are hoping to submit a Building Permit application in
October, go out to bid in 2024, and start construction in early 2025.
• Administration/Maintenance Building. Executive Director Harris reported that this project is moving
along well. They are currently waiting for a permit, and she is hoping to get an update later this week.
They are still looking at completion in late August for an early September move in. They will start
internal discussions soon about an open house in the fall.
Commissioner Grant asked what type of equipment and furniture has been ordered for the new
Commission Meeting Room. Executive Director Harris answered that the furniture would be very close
to the example sent in by Commissioner Grant, allowing it to be moved around and reconfigured.
Manager Drennan said the furniture has been ordered and received. They are on wheels and have a
desktop and privacy screen. She got the idea from the Port of Seattle's meeting space. They will only
be able to do two tables across, so some reconfiguration might be needed. Executive Director Harris
summarized the AV equipment plan, noting that staff will start purchasing soon.
• Rebranding. The purpose of the Port rebrand is to update the Port logo, slogan and color scheme
while refining the overall brand identity. The scope for this phase of the project includes development of
brand architecture, new logos for the Port, Marina and Harbor Square, new slogan/tagline for the Port
and Marina, brand kit, collateral templates, and fully designed and developed website. Future Packet Pg. 118
will include signage, etc.
Commissioner Orvis asked if the new logo would be available before a sign is placed on the new
Administration/Maintenance Building. Executive Director Harris answered that a sign won't be placed
on the building until the new logo design is ready. Commissioner Johnston encouraged Commissioners
to respond to the survey they received today, and Executive Director Harris announced that the project
would kick-off with a workshop session at the next Commission meeting that will be facilitated by the
consultant. Following the workshop, she can begin to develop some milestones for the project.
• Mid -Marina Breakwater. CG Engineering was on site in March looking at the Mid -Marina Breakwater,
and they produced a structural observation report. The Commission selected a path forward using
Option 3. Phase 1 involves replacing the lower four feet of timber lagging with new treated lagging. This
work is currently being done with internal labor and is expected to be completed sometime in October.
Commissioner Grant asked if a dollar amount was approved for the project. Manager Drennan
answered that the original approval was $150,000, which was recommended to cover staff labor for
Phase 1, as well as having a consultant design Phase 2. Executive Director Harris added that Phase 2
involves adding a steel strongback channel near the top of the vertical piles, and staff is currently
preparing a bid packet to go out later in the week. Commissioner Grant asked staff to provide a
summary of the anticipated project costs for the Commission's review. Commissioner Johnston noted
that Phase 2 will require additional permitting since they will be beefing up the breakwater instead of
just making repairs.
• Atrium Windows at Harbor Square. Atrium windows are located at Buildings 1, 3 and 4 at Harbor
Square, and they need to be changed out due to extensive leaking. CG Engineering is working to
finalize the design. The original thought was to phase the project over a two -to -three-year period,
starting with the west side of Building 3. Once the design work is done, they will submit for permits and
prepare a general estimate for construction.
Commissioner Grant asked if the Port has condition reports for the buildings at Harbor Square. During
a recent walkaround at Harbor Square, he noted there is water penetration on at least one building. He
voiced concern that they should never let buildings get to that point. Some of the buildings at Harbor
Square look rather rough in certain areas, and a condition report would help them know what needs to
be done. Manager Drennan advised that a condition report was completed a few years ago, but they
haven't finished making all of the repairs identified. She agreed to locate the report and forward it to
the Commissioners. Executive Director Harris said she would like to have a view of all of the needed
projects and repairs for the Commission and staff to discuss at the upcoming Strategic Planning
Retreat.
Manager Drennan explained that the water damage at Building 3 was not visible because it was sealed
off behind the walls. Commissioner Grant said he knows of a company that uses a rather inex Packet Pg. 119
device to see water penetration behind walls. At airports and seaports he worked at previously, this F 6.5.e
inspection was done every five years. Commissioner Orvis recalled that when the Port took over
Harbor Square in 2007, the roof on Building 5 sagged. They had to lift that entire corner of the building.
They also had to jack up one end of Building 4 to so the crack in the back wall could be repaired.
Manager Drennan added that major repairs were needed on two of the buildings when the Port took
over. With Building 4, the crack was so large that a slender person could walk through it. Commissioner
Johnston pointed out that there are compressible fills under the buildings, so subsidence will continue
to stress the structures.
Commissioner Grant asked which building at Harbor Square the reserve fund for potential
contamination would apply to. Commissioner Johnston answered that the potential contamination
would be primarily under Building 4 but could extend to Building 5. Commissioner Orvis added that it
could also include a small area under the northeast side of the parking lot at Building 2. He noted that
the parking lots around Building 4 have already been redone. Commissioner Johnston said the good
news is that the parking lots and buildings are providing an effective cap for the time being.
Commissioner Preston asked if the atrium windows could be replaced quicker. He felt that two to three
years seems too long. Manager Drennan said the phasing was based on the Port's available funding. It
will cost more than $300,000 to replace all of them.
• Grant Funding for the North Portwalk and Seawall Reconstruction Project. Executive Director Harris
explained that the Port is currently pursuing four different grants for this project. Staff is currently pulling
together overview information for each of the grants and working with the lobbyist, Elevate, to secure a
grant writer. They are reviewing the grant requirements and laying out a communication plan with local
stakeholders, elected officials, etc. At the next meeting, she will present requests for specific
Commission support. The lobbyist is looking at a timeframe for a trip to Washington D.C., and it would
be great if multiple Commissioners would be willing to travel for that.
Commissioner Grant recalled last year, he sent former Executive Director McChesney information
w
regarding the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Grant
p
Program, which outlined who was awarded grant funding and why. One of the Port's biggest challenges
a
with the RAISE Grant Program is that it is usually given to supply chain ports and the focus is on
transportation systems. This means they will have to pull in support and look at the Port of Edmonds as
m
E
a transportation area. A short time ago, Representative Rick Larsen called him to discuss a number of
r
Q
items in relation to grant funding. He asked him about potential earmarks, and Representative Larsen
pointed out some of the things they did with Lake Ballinger with funding from the Army Corps of
Engineers and other sources. Commissioner Grant expressed his belief that the Port cannot expect to
get all of the needed funds from the RAISE Grant Program. In addition to potential funding from the
four federal grants, the Port will have to look at funding opportunities from Washington State and its
I Packet Pg. 120
various agencies.
6.5.e
Commissioner Grant announced that the RAISE grant awards will be announced soon, and he heard a
rumor that there may be supplemental funding for this year. The current funding level for grants is a
once- in -a -lifetime opportunity, and the Port needs to carefully figure out how to take advantage of as
many opportunities as possible. Executive Director Harris agreed and said they have been discussing
how to tailor each of the grant applications to gain attention and call out the specific impacts of the
projects.
• Executive Director Harris advised that, at the next meeting, she would present preliminary timelines
for Commissioner engagement. The timelines can be refined at the Strategic Planning Retreat. In
addition to the large projects they are currently working on, they can also talk about the other projects
that are coming down the road. Commissioner Orvis said they also need to talk about the amount of
work that staff is doing in-house. They may need to add staff to accomplish all of the projects going
forward. Executive Director Harris agreed. She said staffing was lean to start with, and managing all of
the projects has stretched the staff. However, they have done a great job.
411 VAi12:4ONi19101933:141i1:41
Councilmember Teitzel reported that the City Council held a budget retreat in April, and one of the
priorities discussed was the need to solicit citizen input earlier in the budget process. With that in mind,
the City Council will conduct a series of workshops, the first being tonight at 7:00 p.m. at the Public
Works Building. The purpose is to sit down with citizens and outline what the budget is, how it works,
what the numbers look like, and how the citizens want the money to be spent.
Councilmember Teitzel announced that a public hearing on the budget is on the City Council's June
o
20th meeting agenda. On June 22nd, he will host a budget workshop at the Meadowdale Clubhouse
vl
starting at 5:00 p.m. The goal is to hold the workshops in various locations throughout the City. On
N
June 27th at 5:00 p.m., the City Council will have a special meeting on the budget, and the public will
0
E
be invited to provide comments. In July, the administration will start working on the decision packets for
w
0
the budget, so public input will be timely. An online survey on the budget is available on the City's
0
a
website and 15 responses have been received thus far. He agreed to forward the Commissioners a link
to the survey.
m
E
Commissioner Grant asked if the discussions will include moving towards a biennium budget approach.
r
r
Q
Councilmember Teitzel answered that the City Council approved moving forward with a biennium
budget approach at its May 23rd meeting. He announced that the City will be implementing new
budgeting software, as well.
Councilmember Teitzel announced that the City will move forward in 2024 with a project to inst Packet Pg. 121
new stormwater collection vaults along SR-104 at the marsh. The intent is to collect the stormwater a
pretreat it before it is discharged into the marsh. This is all part of the marsh restoration and water -
quality improvement effort for fish and wildlife. Currently, water flows off SR-104 directly into the marsh.
Commissioner Grant asked if the new vaults would be located on Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) land. Councilmember Teitzel answered that the vaults would be installed by
the City on WSDOT property. He explained that the City Council has appropriated $458,000 so far for
the project, part coming from a 2023 grant and part from a 2024 budget appropriation. A consultant
has been hired to design the project, and the designs are expected to be done in late 2023.
�.
Construction should begin in early 2024. While the project won't fix everything, it is a step forward in
as
as
terms of water quality.
Councilmember Teitzel reported that a group of Edmonds citizens and scientists called the Marshians
who are passionate about marsh restoration have put together an application for a grant from the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Resiliency Organization. The grant
is administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, which is under the auspices of NOAA.
The request is for funding to do a study about water quality and hydraulics through the marsh. He
recalled that a study was done some years back about how Willow Creek could be realigned and
daylighted, and three options were put forward. One option that was not explored was excavating
some or most of the fill at the lower yard at the Unocal site. This would enlarge the aquatics of the
marsh and also address flooding. This option will be considered in the new study. The City Council's
Parks and Public Works Committee, which he chairs, will discuss this further at their June 13th meeting
The application was prepared by the Marshians and will be filed by the City's Public Works Director,
Oscar Antillon. They are asking for about $175,000 in grant funding to do the study. A consultant has
not been identified. One concern is that there are a lot of hydrocarbons in the area that would be
excavated.
Commissioner Orvis asked if they have talked to the Department of Ecology (DOE), and
Councilmember Teitzel answered that they plan to. He said the project could move forward whether the
City or the State retains ownership of the property. Commissioner Orvis recalled that the Port did a
similar project between Harbor Square and the marsh, including a neoprene liner down below the
waterline. The DOE wouldn't even let the Port take a sample to see if it was contaminated on the other
side of the levy. Councilmember Teitzel said the grant request is for funding to do a study to assess the
hydrology and potential pollutant issues, and the information would be shared with the DOE and
others. He noted that City Council approval is not needed for the grant application; the administration
can file the grant application under the mayor's authority. They are hoping the Port will offer its support
for the grant request, as well. Executive Director Harris said she would be preparing a letter of support
for the study. Councilmember Teitzel pointed out that if the submerged portion of the marsh was
enlarged, the flooding situation might improve, which would impact the Port at Harbor Square.
Commissioner Preston asked if the City and the Marshian group have researched what data a Packet Pg. 122
exists. Commissioner Johnston recalled that the consultant completed a hydraulic study of the three
options identified in the study related to daylighting Willow Creek. Councilmember Teitzel voiced
concern that the grant application is not well coordinated and may be rushed. He requested that the
City's Public Works Director, Oscar Antillon, meet with the Marshian group and a representative from
the Port to make sure the priorities are in order before the application is finalized. Commissioner Orvis
suggested they review what has already been done. Councilmember Teitzel noted that an assessment
of the option of excavating the fill has not been done.
Commissioner Orvis said a recent article in Myedmondsnews talked about the marsh and showed an
inaccurate picture of the asphalt plant being located where the fuel transfer station should have been.
This is an indication of various people doing things without a central authority to verify that information
is correct. The asphalt plant is an entirely different site of contamination. Commissioner Johnston
pointed out that the Port has a very detailed Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for Harbor Square
that outlines all of the activities that were there and how they might impact the marsh and adjacent
properties.
Commissioner Orvis suggested that they need to form a group of stakeholders who can research the
studies that have already been done and verify that all of the information is correct. Executive Director
Harris reported that she met with Todd Tatum, City of Edmonds Director of Community Services and
Economic Development, to discuss the need for closer discussion and coordination. There are several
areas where the Port and the City can collaborate. There are a number of smart people working on
issues related to the marsh, and they need to make sure they are all at the table.
Commissioner Johnston pointed out that the agencies typically frown on re -disturbing contaminated
sites unless you can demonstrate you can greatly reduce the risk. Commissioner Orvis cautioned that
they could also spend a whole lot of money to accomplish nothing if they aren't careful. Councilmember
Teitzel said he expressed to Mr. Antillon, the City's Public Works Director, the need to be careful about
asking agencies for money for studies when they don't have a big picture in mind of what they want to
do.
Councilmember Teitzel reported that the Council's Parks/Public Works Committee will meet on June
a
13th to discuss a draft letter to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) that will
notify them of Council's intent to send a letter to the Governor requesting a meeting to explore whether
the state would prefer to retain ownership of the Unocal property after the Department of Ecology
Q
(DOE) approves the cleanup of the site and the title is then transferred to WSDOT. As he reported at
the last Port Commission meeting, the Council temporarily tabled the letter to the Governor on May
23rd, in part due to a concern that WSDOT should first be apprised of the City's intent. If the WSDOT
letter is approved by the committee, it will be forwarded to full Council for discussion and a vote. If
approved, the letter will be sent to WSDOT and the Council will then take the letter to the Gov
tho tahlo and finali�o it No nnintorl Hilt that thin niirrhaco of thinnrnnorty is all ahniit calmnn ro
Packet Pg. 123
6.5.e
wildlife, preservation, etc., which are all top state priorities. For that reason, the State may want to
consider retaining control of the property. Commissioner Orvis added that the State has the money and
expertise to accomplish restoration of the property. He observed that there aren't many estuaries left in
the State, and this one is the largest. Councilmember Teitzel added that there will be a lot of
opportunity once they get the site restored and the creek daylighted. He reminded them that, when
running for president, Governor Inslee characterized himself as the environmental candidate. He still
believes this is important, so it would be beneficial for the City and State to work together. o
TOWN OF WOODWAY REPORT
Mayor Mike Quinn reported that the Town Council was supposed to have a vote in June regarding the
Point Wells site, but they requested another 90-day extension to continue to work some issues out with
the City of Shoreline and the developer. They now have until the second week of September to take
action. There continues to be litigation on the property between the two parties. As these issues work
their way through the legal system, the Town Council is keeping an ear to what they may want to do
going forward. The Town hired a consulting firm to do an analysis of a few options for the site, and the
report is available on the City's website. Three of the options center around large, medium and small
housing units. Projects of 24 units or less do not require a secondary access road. For each of the
three options, the analysis looked at what the revenues would be for the Town. The fourth option
brought forward by the developer was to rezone the property back to Industrial and use it for industrial
uses. With this option, the developer would do some level of cleanup, but it would be low impact. The
Town will continue to work with the developer. They are also continuing with the annexation request,
and there will be public comment opportunities throughout the summer. The hope is to move towards a
vote in the August timeframe. He briefly reviewed the annexation process, explaining that if the Town
Council votes to annex, the matter would then go before the Boundary Review Board, which involves a
lengthy process. The Town Council can decide not to proceed with annexation up until the Boundary
Review Board issues its decision.
Mayor Quinn advised that the Town's staff prepared a PowerPoint presentation for the Town Council,
outlining some of the implications of the recent housing legislation. It is available for public view on the
Town's website. They plan to continue to review the legislation to identify how it might impact the
different areas of the Town. For example, the state's new laws do not trump what a homeowner
association (HOA) allows under current zoning and building. There are also issues related to slopes
and other critical areas. They plan to hire a consultant to look at the entire plat of the Town to
determine which areas will and will not be impacted by the legislation.
Mayor Quinn announced that the 2023 Annual Woodway Town Fair will be on August 19th from 10:00
a.m. to 1:30 p.m. He also reported that the Town is once again working with the City of Edmonrls In
Packet Pg. 124
c r�nncnr +hn Qn�+ +hn Qro rlin++ �„n nvi 1„Iv /l+h
J r./J1 IJVI LI IC; LJGQL LI IC; LJI aVf\cu 1\kill VII .PUIY -t Ll 1.
6.5.e
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Harris announced that the Sea Note Program will start on June 23rd and run
through September 2nd. The full calendar will be released on the Port's website later this week.
Performances will occur most Wednesdays through Sundays.
Executive Director Harris reported that staff opted to rebuild the hydraulic cylinder on the North Dry
Storage launcher, and the project is in motion. They anticipate the launcher will be down for about two
more weeks.
Executive Director Harris reminded the Commissioners that the July 10th meeting would be cancelled,
and the July 31st meeting would be a Strategic Planning Retreat.
Manager Drennan advised that the Department of Revenue (DOR) has proposed some changes to the
leasehold tax on concession arrangements for retail sales, basically a percentage rent agreement.
They are saying "if the rent is based in whole or in part on a percentage of sales and includes payment
for leasehold interest as well as a concession or other right granted by the lessor, there is a rebuttable
presumption that the contract rent consists of the first 8% of sales plus any prepaid rent or minimum
rent required under the lease. The department will consider any portion of the contract rent that
exceeds that figure as payment for the concession or other right granted by the lessor. If either party to
a lease agreement believe the fair market value differs from the presumed amount, they may submit
documentation to the department demonstration the fair market rental value for comparable property
with similar use. The department will consider this documentation when determining the value of
leasehold interest." For ports, this can apply to some rental arrangements, but she cautioned that
talking about specific tenants should be done in executive session. The Washington Public Port
Association (WPPA) has hired State and Local Tax Attorney, Garry Fujita, from Eisenhower Carlson
PLLC. The cost of the attorney is not included in the normal dues, and ports that want to participate will
be asked to pay up to $1,000. After speaking with Executive Director Harris, staff decided to notify the
WPPA of the Port's intent to participate.
Manager Drennan continued that the DOR held a hearing on June 6th, and comments were originally
due by June 9th. Attorney Frank Chmelik requested a 90-day extension and a 30-day extension was r
Q
granted. At the hearing, the ports were represented by Attorneys Chmelik and Fujita, who both argued
that the change would have a negative impact on port operations and revenue. The way leases are set
up, ports moderate risk by increasing the monthly fixed revenue and reducing the percentage of sales
rent component. If the DOR mandates 8% in all transactions, the minimum monthly rent will necessarily
decrease to the Port, and the risks will increase. The state will get more money and the Port will get
less. It would also make negotiating for leases a little more difficult because ports want to get f Packet Pg. 125
market value as well as minimize risk, and the new rule would artificially limit one of the primary
variables, limiting a port's ability to negotiate leases. Ports must compete with private businesses, as
well as each other, and ports will have a harder time if contract rent is constrained to a combination of
fixed and percentage rent. Those without the artificial 8% restraint will be at a competitive advantage.
Ports are in the business of economic development and job creation, and the new requirement would
make this more difficult.
Attorney Frank Chmelik provided an explanation on how the DOR's new requirement might impact
ports, and this was followed by a discussion about how it might specifically impact the Port of Edmonds
and its tenants and taxpayers. Attorney Chmelik cautioned that, regardless of what rule is adopted,
ports will need to be very careful to show their homework of why they set on a particular rent in order to
demonstrate their thinking to auditors.
Executive Director Harris reminded the Commissioners to complete the rebranding survey.
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
Commissioner Orvis reported on his participation in the Economic Alliance of Snohomish County's
(EASCs) Coffee Chat on June 7th, where cybersecurity was the topic of discussion. From the
discussion, he learned that most people are very far behind, and many businesses are vulnerable. The
Port is far ahead of most others and has a good opportunity to help out. They talked about using
interns from Edmonds Community College, and perhaps the Port would be a good place for them since
our IT Staff knows more about cybersecurity than most people.
Commissioner Grant reported that he attended the Washington Public Port Association (WPPA)
Finance Committee Meeting and learned a lot of good things. Manager Drennan did a good job
bringing up some good points. Cybersecurity was tagged on to just about every presentation at the
meeting. One of the presenters turned a good presentation into a Jeopardy format. He asked to get
the slide decks because a lot of good information was shared.
Commissioner Grant said he met with Eric Ffitch, WPPA Executive Director, to discuss cyber security.;
He is running the cyber workgroup and has met with some of the Commissioners who will participate to
c
E
discuss initial aspects. Both the Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the U.S.
r
Coast Guard have cyber teams that will evaluate ports and do actual penetration. They will be focusing
r
Q
on vulnerabilities and providing recommendations for outside consultants, since many small ports don't
really know what to ask or do. There are lists of reputable vendors that the governments have vetted.
He met with Tacoma, Seattle and a few others and found that a lot of the small ports get great
notifications from the Washington Fusion Center, the Federal Bureau of Investigations, or the New York
Police Department, but they aren't really talking to a trained technician. While they know what i
Packet Pg. 126
they don't have any idea how to implement it. Seattle and Tacoma have a chief security officer who is
separate from the IT division, and all they are worried about is penetration. He sits on the Federal
Emergency Management Agency's (FEMAs) Law Enforcement Task Force, and there are a few big
vulnerabilities to big and small ports. Cyber and denial of service is probably the biggest, and another
is where they give you a fake website and you end up transferring money or something of that nature.
A third is critical infrastructure invasion. The goal is to voluntarily work together with every port that
wants to be part of the cyber effort. The Washington Alliance of Technology Workers (WashTech), the
U.S. Coast Guard and CISA have all agreed to help put a program together.
-
Commissioner Preston said he also participated in the EASCs Coffee Chat regarding cybersecurity.
There was a lot of discussion about academia and not a lot about what businesses should do to
prevent and protect and insure against vulnerability. They estimate they are lacking several hundred
thousand cybersecurity jobs. The demand is huge right now.
Commissioner Preston advised that the Edmonds Yacht Club has expressed a desire to coordinate with
the Port to do a Santa event during the Holiday on the Docks event. He asked if there are any plans to
celebrate the Port's 75th Anniversary this year. Executive Director Harris suggested they consider
opportunities to celebrate the Port's anniversary as part of the open house for the new
Administration/Maintenance Building or Holiday on the Docks. She questioned whether there is
sufficient bandwidth for staff to do both. Staff agreed to consider options, and Director Baker agreed to
coordinate directly with the yacht club.
Commissioner Cass said she is happy to be part of the Commission. She would love to receive copies
of the historic environmental assessments so she can start reviewing them.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 8:46 p.m., Commissioner Johnston announced that the Commission would recess into Executive
Session pursuant to Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 42.30.110(1)(i) to discuss with legal counsel
representing the agency matters relating to litigation or legal risks of a proposed action or current
practice that the agency has identified, as public discussion of the litigation or legal risks is likely to
result in an adverse legal or financial consequence to the agency. The Executive Session would start at
8:50 p.m. and last for 20 minutes. The Executive Session would conclude at 9:10 p.m.
At 9:10 p.m. Commissioner Johnston announced that the Executive Session would be extended 10
minutes until 9:20 p.m. The Executive Session concluded at 9:20 p.m. and the Commission
reconvened the regular meeting.
ADJOURNMENT I Packet Pg. 127
6.5.e
The Commission meeting was adjourned at 9:21 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jay Grant
Port Commission Secretary
TAGS: 2023 Port of Edmonds Commission Meeting Minutes
(https://www.portofedmonds.org/tag/2023-port-of-edmonds-commission-meeting-
minutes/), Executive Session (https://www.portofedmonds.org/tag/executive-session/),
Project Summary (https://www.portofedmonds.org/tag/project-summary/)
Packet Pg. 128
PORT COMMISSION OF THE PORT OF EDMONDS MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING
(Via Zoom, Hybrid Meeting) June 20, 2023
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
0
Steve Johnston, President
a�
Jim Orvis, Vice President
as
a�
E
Jay Grant, Secretary
E
Janelle Cass
v
David Preston
c
L
O
STAFF PRESENT
m
m
Angela Harris, Executive Director
Brandon Baker, Director of Marina Operations
0
Tina Drennan, Manager of Finance and Accounting?
Brittany Williams, Manager of Properties and Economic Development
Brian Menard, Director of Facilities & Maintenance
Chris Osterman, Accounting/IT
a�
Karin Michaud, Office Manager o
.y
Renae Ebel, Administrative Assistant
OTHERS PRESENT
Selena Killin, Commissioner Candidate
Jordan Stephens, Port Attorney
Chrissy Svihus, Associate Attorney
Frank Chmelik, Attorney / Training Facilitator
CALL TO ORDER
President Johnston called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m.
FLAG SALUTE
All those in attendance participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COMMISSIONER JOHNSTON MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDAAS PRESENTED,
WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC COMMENTS I Packet Pg. 129
There were no public comments.
6.5.f
TRAINING
Commissioner Johnston introduced Frank Chmelik, commission/staff training facilitator.
Mr. Chmelik facilitated a training session on commission/staff engagement in a public agency. The
training was titled "Governance and Management — Building on a History of Success- Resetting for the
Future" and included topics such as: governance vs. management, the individual commissioner vs the
commission, the chair of the commission, executive director and staff responsibilities, and what is
means to have budget -based governance.
Executive Director Harris then led a discussion on major Port of Edmonds projects and the
engagement between commissioners and staff.
ADJOURNMENT
The Commission meeting was adjourned at 12:50p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jay Grant
Port Commission Secretary
TAGS: 2023 Port of Edmonds Minutes (https://www.portofedmonds.org/tag/2023-port-of-
edmonds-minutes/), Frank Chmelik (https://www.portofedm onds.org/tag/frank-chmelik/),
Training (https://www.portofedmonds.org/tag/training/)
Packet Pg. 130
6.5.g
SNOHOMISH
COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
91 BOARD MEETING AGENDA
July 20, 2023 at 8:30 a.m.
7 # Web Conference — Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86000466014?pwd=YWxBbE9HMIJuT2ZXMmtYVU8rSnBkUT09
Meeting ID: 860 0046 6014, Passcode: 195881
or dial +1 253 215 8782
Physical location: 1121 SE Everett Mall Way, Everett Police Department, South Precinct
Please note that most Board members and staff attend the meeting remotely. However,
pursuant to RCW 42.30, a physical location is also provided.
1. Call to Order
A. Roll Call
B. Announcements
2. Public Comments
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Consent Agenda
A. Minutes from the June 15, 2023 Regular Board Meeting
B. June 2023 Blanket Voucher & Payroll Approval Form:
i. Checks 1009 - 1012, and 17540 - 17658, for a total of $1,221,806.51
ii. Payroll Direct Deposit, in the amount of $1,317,588.26
C. APF —Fleet Expansion
5. Director's Report
A. Schedule a Board Future Facility Project Overview
6. Old Business
A. SCEA Contract Negotiations
7. New Business
A. APF — Tower Site Agreements
B. APF RRP — Radio System Maintenance Agreement
C. APF — Radio Policy 10, 11 & Interoperability MOU
D. Tax Except Status
8. Reports
A. Agency Report
B. Future Facility Project Update
C. Radio Replacement Project (RRP)
L
0
a�
a�
a�
r
E
E
0
U
c
L
0
m
a�
.N
0
0
N
0
M
N
O
N
CU
a�
a�
a
L
CU
0
m
O
z
c
a�
E
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 131
6.5.g
D. Police TAC
E. Fire TAC
9. Committee Reports
A. Finance Committee
B. Personnel Committee
C. Future Facility Committee
D. County EESCS Committee (formerly County E911 Office)
E. County ECSF Program Advisory Board
10. Executive Session (if needed)
11. Good of the Order
12. Adjourn - The next meeting is scheduled for August 17, 2023
Packet Pg. 132
I 6.5.h I
Stanwood Darrington
Snohomish County Tomorrow
A GROWTH MANAGEMENT AD VISOR COUNCIL
1
FA
STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, May 24, 2023
Via Zoom
6:00 p.m.
MEETING MINUTES
Particinatina Jurisdictions/Members
Tulalip Arlington
Tribes
Marysville Granite Falls
Everett Lake Stevens
Mukilteo Mill Creek
Lynnwood Snohomish
Edmontls Mountlake
Monroe
Terrace Sultan Gold Index
Noodway Brier Bothell Bar
Town of Darrin ton
Reid Shockley
City of Edmonds
Councilmember Vivian Olson
City of Everett
Don Schwab
City of Gold Bar
Councilmember Chuck Lie
City of Granite Falls
Matt Hartman
City of Lake Stevens
Mayor Brett Gaile
City of Lynnwood
Councilmember Patrick Decker
City of Marysville
Peter Cond les
City of Mill Creek
Councilmember Stephanie Vi nal
City of Monroe
Mayor Geoffrey Thomas
City of Mountlake Terrace
Councilmember Bryan Wahl
City of Mukilteo
Councilmember Jason Moon
Snohomish County Council
Councilmember Jared Mead
Snohomish County Executive
Josh Dugan
Community Representative
Mike Appleby
Community Representative
Linda Hoult
Community Representative
Allan Giffen
CAB Representative
Sean Standerfer
Other Attendees/Presenters:
SCT Manager
Ann Larson
Snohomish County PDS
Megan Moore
Snohomish County PDS
Mike McCrary
Snohomish County PDS
Amber Piona
Snohomish County PDS
Steve To
Call to Order:
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Co -Chair Brett Gailey.
Introductions/Roll Call
Roll call was taken (as listed above).
Snohomish County PDS Director, Mike McCrary, introduced the new SCT Manager Ann
Larson. Ann has more than 17 years of experience and joins the county with extensive
knowledge and passion for its future. She served as a Senior Legislative Assistant in the
Washington State Legislature for 44th Legislative District from 2006-2011, followed by
Packet Pg. 133
6.5.h
several years at the United Way of Snohomish County as Labor Donor Relations &
Community Liaison Manager. Most recently she was the Northwest Regional Director for
U.S. Senator Patty Murray since 2014. She has a bachelor's degree in history from
Washington State University in 2006.
Following the introduction of Ann Larson each of the members introduced themselves
and talked about their history on the Steering Committee.
3. Citizen Comments
No comments.
4. Approval of Meeting Minutes (4-26-23)
Bryan Wahl moved to approve the minutes of April 26, 2023. Josh Dugan seconded, and
the motion passed unanimously.
5. Update Items
a. Summary of PSRC Board Actions and Activities
The update was suspended until the June meeting. The summary of PSRC
Board Actions can be found here.
6. Action Items
a. Agenda Bill: Re -vote, Citizen Representative to Steering Committee
Community Representative applicant Allan Giffen introduced himself and
discussed why he wanted to be a citizen representative. Community
representative applicant Andrew Stevens was absent.
VOTE:
Allen Giffen — 8 votes (Vivian Olson, Don Schwab, Matt Hartman, Brett Gailey,
Patrick Decker, Geoffrey Thomas, Jason Moon, Josh Dugan)
Andrew Stevens — 4 votes (Charles Lie, Stephanie Vignal, Bryan Wahl, Jared
Mead)
Allen Giffen was elected as the Citizen Representative to Steering
Committee.
a. Agenda Bill: HO-5 Report, PAC Recommendation, PAC Recommended Draft
Report, PAC Recommended Appendices, Executive Summary
Senior Planner, Amber Piona introduced the action item. The committee was
briefed on the HO-5 Report at the April 261" meeting. An action on the report and
a recommendation for the housing targets is needed.
A Motion was made by Bryan Wahl and seconded by Geoffrey Thomas
recommending the Steering Committee accept the housing characteristics and
needs report and the 2044 initial housing targets.
A discussion followed the motion. Members discussed their views on the HO-5
Report, the housing allocation methods, infrastructure challenges, and the
challenges of meeting the growth targets. Several members brought up the need
Packet Pg. 134
6.5.h
for subsidized funding to meet allocations. It was also noted that educating
councilmembers on the allocations is imperative to ensure they fully understand
the requirements of the recommendation.
Gold Bar Councilmember Charles Lie stated his opinion that zoning issues in the
cities and suburban areas caused the housing crisis and the housing allocation
assigned to Gold Bar is a problem due to Gold Bar's infrastructure challenges
specifically access to medical care.
Mountlake Terrace Councilmember Bryan Wahl raised his concern about the
challenges to accommodate the affordable housing need, since over half of the
housing will need to be affordable. The crisis needs to be addressed by working
as a region and educating councilmembers on these future challenges.
Mukilteo Councilmember Jason Moon expressed his disagreement with Mukilteo
being classified as a high transit area because there is no highway or freeway in
Mukilteo.
Councilmember Vivian Olson expressed frustration by the density demands for
Edmonds. The majority of the allocation for Edmonds is in the low range.
Edmonds has high land values, and the affordable housing will require a subsidy
from the government. The state has never said that subsidies will be given yet
we know that higher taxes will be yielded by the higher and best use for the
property values that are changed by density options.
Mill Creek Councilmember Stephanie Vignal voiced her concern that the majority
of Mill Creek's allocation is low AMI and that investments and government
funding will be needed to meet their allotment. She has been advocating for all
council's to be educated about the HO-5 Report for early buy -in and is concerned
that councilmembers will be upset when they are made more aware of the
requirements of the allocations.
Lynnwood Councilmember Patrick Decker recognized the effort that has been
put into the report but voiced that he can't vote yes for something he believes is
impossible to do. Lynnwood City Council has discussed how to incentivize
builders to create affordable housing but the current economy in Lynnwood is
increasing home prices.
Community Representative Allen Giffen said he is also concerned about the
economic feasibility for the low-income housing without government funding. He
requested that county staff have more of an education process for the elected
city councils in the county.
Packet Pg. 135
6.5.h
Mayor Geoffrey Thomas said that Monroe recognizes the housing crises and
Monroe is supportive of bringing more affordable housing into Monroe and the
region.
VOTE (Motion):
8 in favor (Reid Shockey, Vivian Olson, Don Schwab, Brett Gailey, Stephanie
Vignal, Geoffrey Thomas,
1 opposed (Jason Moon)
3 abstained (Charles Lie,
Motion PASSED
Bryan Wahl, Josh Dugan)
Matt Hartman, Patrick Decker)
A secondary Motion was made by Geoffrey Thomas and seconded by Bryan
Wahl recommending the Steering Committee accept the HO-5 report with the
Method C Housing Needs Allocation.
Following the motion clarification was given on the recommendation, in particular
that the requirement is for jurisdictions to demonstrate that they need to "plan for
and accommodate" the new requirements, not that they are required to build the
additional housing by 2044. Methods A, B, and C were also clarified.
Councilmember Vivian Olson said of each method, method C allocates the
largest number of affordable housing units to Edmonds and is an enormous
number for Edmonds and will be voting no on option C because it seems like an
impossible task.
Councilmember Patrick Decker discussed the extensive work Lynwood has done
with their planning department, mortgage lenders, and builders and that Lynwood
can't come up with a plan that will create affordable housing at the required
levels.
Everett Councilmember Don Schwab expressed that Everett has higher amount
of the LMI and that Everett is built out and the value of property is extremely high
It is extremely expensive to build affordable housing, so he see's the allocations
as a framework and a goal.
Mill Creek Councilmember Stephanie Vignal said that in talking with her planning
department their interpretation is that they will need to implement polices to
encourage building but that they aren't required to ensure it will be built.
VOTE (Motion):
7 in favor (Reid Shockey, Don Schwab, Brett Gailey, Stephanie Vignal, Geoffrey
Packet Pg. 136
6.5.h
Thomas, Bryan Wahl, Josh Dugan)
4 opposed (Vivian Olson, Patrick Decker, Peter Condyles, Jason Moon)
2 abstained (Charles Lie, Matt Hartman)
Motion PASSED
7. Briefings, Discussion Items
a. SCT Manager's Report
SCT Manager Ann Larson shared the May SCT Committees Report.
8. Go -Round
Brett Gailey brought up rising interest rates which have put a stop on some current
projects in Lake Stevens.
9. Next Meeting Date
June 21, 2023; 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm.
10. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:15 p.m. by Co -Chair Brett Gailey.
All presentations given, discussions held, and actions taken at this meeting are kept on file (via recording) in PDS until six years
from December 3111 of this year.
Packet Pg. 137
Edmonds Public Facilities District
Board of Directors Meeting
May 25, 2023
The Edmonds Public Facilities District Board hybrid meeting convened at 7:31 a.m. in the
Edmonds Center for the Arts Green Room, 410 411 Avenue North, Edmonds, and via Zoom.
EPFD Board Members Present
Ray Liaw, President
Suzy Maloney
David Brewster
Wayne Grotheer
EPFD Board Members Absent
Bill Willcock, Vice President
Call to Order
ECA Staff Present
Joseph Mclalwain, Executive Director
Lori Meagher, Associate Executive Director
ECA Board Members Present
David Schaefer, President
Guests
Will Chen, City Council Liaison
Board President Liaw called the meeting to order.
2. Land Acknowledgement & Equity Statement
Board Member Grotheer read the Land Acknowledgement Statement and the Equity Statement.
3. Board President's Comments
• Agenda Review
Board President Liaw requested reappointment of Board Member Maloney be added under PFD
Board Business.
BOARD MEMBER BREWSTER MOVED TO AMEND THE AGENDA TO ADD REAPPOINTMENT
OF BOARD MEMBER MALONEY TO PFD BOARD BUSINESS. BOARD MEMBER GROTHEER
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Board President Liaw relayed staff's request to reschedule the June EPFD Board meeting to June
29t" due to a conflict with the Admin & Finance Committee.
4. Public Comment - None
6. Consent Agenda
EPFD Board Meeting Minutes: April 27, 2023
EPFD Disbursement Report: April 2023
BOARD MEMBER MALONEY MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. BOARD
MEMBER BREWSTER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
May 25, 2023
Page 1
Packet Pg. 138
7. Old Business
• May Staff Report — Questions/Comments?
• Prior Action Items Review
Ms. Meagher reviewed progress on action items from the previous meeting and identified
outstanding items (see Action Items below).
8. PFD Board Business
• Reappointment of Maloney
BOARD MEMBER GROTHEER MOVED TO REAPPOINTMENT SUZY MALONEY TO THE PFD
BOARD. BOARD MEMBER BREWSTER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Mclalwain advised City Council approval of Board Member Maloney's reappointment will be
on the Council's Consent Agenda.
• Internal Committee Appointments
Board President Liaw advised the packet includes a list of current committee appointments.
Following up on last month's discussion, this agenda item is to identify which committees board
members are currently serving on and/or would like to serve on, and to strategically determine
which committees need EPFD Board representation. Discussion followed regarding committees
board members are serving on currently, what each committees does, which committees need
EPFD Board support, how committee members have been selected in the past, and reviewing
committee appointments every year in May/June.
Committee
Board Member
Marketing & Business Development
Brewster short term
Philanthropy
Willcock need to confirm Possibly Maloney
Administration & Finance
Willcock (need to confirm)
Board Governance
Does not need EPFD Board representation
Education & Community Outreach
Brewster
Facilities & Operations
Grotheer
Hosting
Liaw
IDEA
Gr
Steering
Liaw
Action regarding committee assignments includes informing the Steering Committee, Board
Governance Committee and ECA Board of committee appointments; updating the committee list;
informing committee chairs of the change in EPFD Board representation, informing board
members of the committee schedules, and updating the EPFD and ECA meeting schedule to
include meetings start/end times.
8. Board Member Reports
Leadership Transition Update
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
May 25, 2023
Page 2
Packet Pg. 139
Board President Liaw provided an update on the executive director (ED) search process;
m/Oppenheim e-blasted an announcement to 438 researched individuals in the US and Canada,
engaged with 116 people, and recommended 8 applicants for consideration. The LTT is
determining which applicants to interview. Interviews will as held soon as next Friday with the goal
of identifying finalists by the end of June. Applicants have a spectrum of experience and strengths,
all have some anchor in the arts and/or education.
Board Member Brewster relayed in addition to a spectrum of age/experience, the candidates have
strengths and gaps. M/Oppenheim reported a lot of people were interested in the job and there
was a good initial response; some candidates self-selected out and the candidates they
recommended for consideration were all very interested. Ms. Meagher agreed there was a broad
spectrum of candidates and skill sets. There has been an emphasis on ensuring IDEA is a focus,
but that has not been highlighted in any of the candidates' application materials so the LTT has
been asking candidates about their IDEA work. There is diversity among the candidates.
Board President Liaw advised m/Oppenheim is still vetting applicants and may present more
candidates. She will endeavor to send out more frequent updates to the boards during June. The
EPFD Board will make final decision on selection of an ED. Staff, both boards and key committee
members will have an opportunity to meet candidates at a meet & greet or presentation. The ECA
will be closed the first week of July.
Discussion followed regarding the process for selecting finalists, who will participate in interviews,
gaps in experience providing opportunity for growth, key areas of experience (development and
DEIA), and a suggestion to include volunteers in the meet & greet.
• Association of WA State PFDs
Board Member Brewster reported the Association is meeting in Tri-Cities in September. Mr.
Mclalwain's discussion with other Snohomish County PFDs will determine who is involved in
annual or quarterly meetings. He recommended informing Betty Erickson (Cowlitz PFD) the
results of Mr. Mclalwain's conversation with the Snohomish County PFDs.
• Snohomish County PFD
No update.
• Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor
Ms. Meagher reported the committee had a kickoff meeting with the consultant doing the
conceptual design to 10%, and the consultant outlined next steps. The committee is meeting
again in a couple weeks to discuss stakeholder engagement and the public outreach process.
She will confer with Frances Chapin regarding expanding the invite list.
• Boys & Girls Club
Committee is meeting quarterly, the next meeting is in 1-2 weeks.
9. Finance & Operations Update
• Finance Update
o ADril Financials
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
May 25, 2023
Page 3
Packet Pg. 140
Ms. Meagher reviewed the financial dashboard, income statement, balance sheet, and operating
cash projections. Discussion followed regarding the robust summer schedule and revenue
potential, impact of the delayed hiring of development staff on yearend goals, reviewing yearend
development projections at the July meeting, looking at the mid -year budget in more detail at the
July meeting, and projected revenues and expenses from summer shows.
o Recommended Board Designated Fund Amount
Ms. Meagher recommended not transferring funds into the Board Designated Fund at this time
based on the previous fiscal year and current cashflow. If 2023 projected $150,000 surplus at
yearend occurs, she will recommend moving that into the Board Designated Fund. No formal
board action was required; it was the consensus of the board not to transfer funds at this time.
Staff will inform the Admin & Finance Committee that the EPFD Board agreed not to transfer
funds into the Board Designated Fund at this time.
o Quarterly Debt Service Update
Ms. Meagher reviewed Estimated Sales Tax collections vs. Debt Service Payments updated as
of May 23, 2023. She pointed out due to the increase in the LGIP interest rate, it may require an
additional year to repay the City loan. Mr. Mclalwain suggested possibly paying off the City loan
sooner due to the variable LGIP interest rate. Discussion followed regarding how interest on the
City loan is projected, and how the LGIP interest rate is calculated.
o State Funding for Conceptual Design Work (Boys & Girls Club)
Ms. Meagher relayed the application submitted to the state is included in packet. The original
request was for $309,000; the state approved $200,000. Next steps include the board and staff
discussing future actions related to conceptual design work. Mr. Mclalwain explained the initial
discussions were about campus options via a partnership with the Boys & Girls Club. The question
now is who will oversee that effort and the schedule. Discussion followed regarding aspects that
will be addressed in the building assessment, determining how the state funds can be used, joint
planning with the Boys & Girls Club, mechanism for pursuing the conceptual design work, and
having the conceptual design work/state funding as a topic at the next Boys & Girls Club meeting.
• Human Resources
o Hiring Update
Ms. Meagher reported on the potential hiring of a grant writer as a subcontractor, phone interviews
for the major gift specialist position, and updating and posting the accounting position. Once the
accounting position is filled, the ECA will be fully staffed.
o IDEA Update
Ms. Meagher reported the recent meeting included discussion about department initiatives and
gender neutral restrooms. Board Member Brewster requested the committee discuss modifying
the Land Acknowledgement to recognize the land is unceded (taken from the tribes, not given
freely). He suggested Seattle Arts and Lecture as a good example.
o Employee Handbook Rollout Update
Ms. Meagher advised the PowerPoint is included in the packet; it was well received by staff. A
couple tweaks need to be made to the handbook before it is shared with staff.
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
May 25, 2023
Page 4
Packet Pg. 141
• Facilities
o RFQ 2023-01 Building Envelope & Conditions Assessment Update
The RFQ will be on the July EPFD Board agenda for approval.
10. Executive Report / Steering Committee
• Marketing & Business Development
o Ticket Sales Update
Mr. Mclalwain reported tickets are at 71 % sold for the current season which is close to the average
tickets sold for the lifespan of the organization.
• Programming/Outreach
o General Update
Mr. Mclalwain reported 3-4 shows will be added between now and the end of the current fiscal
year to meet ticket sales obligations. Consideration is being given to adjusting ticket pricing for
the 2024/2025 season based on seat location and having more seats at the top price.
• Development
o Monthly Snapshot Update on Development Strategy
11. Executive Session
At 8:47 a.m., the EPFD Board convened in executive session for approximately 20 minutes to
discuss with legal counsel representing the agency matters relating to agency enforcement
actions, or to discuss with legal counsel representing the agency litigation or potential litigation
per RCW 42.30.110 (1) (i). No action was anticipated as a result of meeting in executive session.
At 9:05 a.m., the executive session was extended for 5 minutes.
12. New Business - None
13. Adjourn
The meeting adjourned immediately following the conclusion of the executive session at 9:10 a.m.
Next EPFD Board Meeting: Thursday, June 29, 2023 - 7:30 AM
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Create external organization chart
2. Send out meeting invite to revised June meeting date (June 29)
3. June EPFD Board meeting agenda items
a. Approval of Building Envelope & Condition Assessment contract
b. Report on how Employee Handbook is received by staff
c. Report on meeting with Snohomish County PFDs executives regarding Association of
Washington PFDs (inform Betty Erickson (Cowlitz PFD) about discussion)
d. Review yearend development projections
e. Review mid -year budget in more detail
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
May 25, 2023
Page 5
Packet Pg. 142
4. Inform Steering Committee of appointment of EPFD Board members to outside
committees/organizations
5. Contact City about scheduling approval of Board Member Maloney's reappointment on
City Council Consent Agenda
6. Committee Assignments
a. Update Board Committee list and inform Steering Committee, ECA Board, and Board
Governance Committee
b. Inform EPFD Board members regarding committee schedule
c. Inform committee chairs about changes in EPFD board representative
d. Update EPFD, ECA and Committee Meeting Schedule to include meeting start/end
time
7. Provide EPFD Board frequent updates in June regarding ED search/interview process
8. Check with Frances Chapin about expanding the invite list for 4t" Avenue Cultural Corridor
project
9. Inform Admin & Finance of EPFD Board's decision not to put funds into the Board
Designated Fund
10. IDEA Committee discuss modifying the land acknowledgement statement to address that
land was unceded
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
May 25, 2023
Page 6
Packet Pg. 143
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes July 18, 2023
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Scott Passey
Background/History
N/A
Recommendation
Approval of Council Special Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
The Council Special meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
20230718 Regular Meeting
Packet Pg. 144
7.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
July 18, 2023
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Nelson, Mayor
Neil Tibbott, Council President
Vivian Olson, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Dave Teitzel, Councilmember
Jenna Nand, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director
Susan McLaughlin, Planning & Dev. Dir.
David Levitan, Planning Manager
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council
Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Paine read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original
inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who
since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their
sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land
and water."
3. ROLL CALL
City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present.
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson described the procedures for audience comments.
Peter Moon, Edmonds, said progress is being made to reduce speeding on Olympic View Drive; speeding
is a public safety hazard that needs attention. He met with the City's transportation engineer and public
works director via Zoom meeting last Thursday. The meeting was recorded and the link was provided to a
few councilmembers and is available for anyone else who is interested. The police traffic division has been
paying closer attention and have been in the area on multiple locations issuing citations for speeding on
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 1
Packet Pg. 145
7.1.a
Olympic View Drive. He has met a number of neighbors north of the 200-foot straightaway that is his
primary concern; two are here tonight and one plans to speak. They are considering forming a neighborhood
association to deal with speeding and other issues of concern to the neighborhood along Olympic View
Drive. He has heard there will be changes to the state law regarding traffic cameras in locations other than
intersections or school zones. He plans to research that and report to the council. During his meeting with
City staff he recommended upgrading the technology to monitor the amount, type and speeds of traffic to
improve the safety of those collecting the data and to provide better data. He thanked the councilmembers
who are supportive of his efforts and have communicated with him via email.
Marlin Phelps, Marysville, relay as reported in the Everett Hearld, Yelena Stock of Zachor, Stock &
Krepps said she committed her full cooperation to the transfer of prosecution services in Edmonds. Yet last
Tuesday when observed the court proceedings via video, he heard Ms. Wells, the new city prosecutor, say
she was flying by the seat of her pants because although her office and Zachor's office use the same
software, the files did not transfer. He anticipated that was Zachor, Stock and Krepps giving the City of
Edmonds one final finger. He referred to terrible things Zachor, Stock and Krepps did to the innocent. After
103 summoned hearings and two acquittals following a short jury deliberation and beatings from the cops,
what he remembered most was during his resistance he saw James Zachor Junior and it occurred to him
that he looked just his wife; he believed that James Zachor was his secret brother-in-law. He deserves an
answer regarding why they still have a relationship when the prosecution was fumbled and he was acquitted
twice. When he was in court in Snohomish County in front of Judge Wilson who was outside his
jurisdiction, the judge asked if he was his brother-in-law and he said no, they were just friends. Two weeks
ago the secretary at the law firm said same thing, they are just friends. He concluded he was set up, he
deserves the DNA and the truth.
Joan Longstaff, Edmonds, speaking on behalf of the Cemetery Board, commented Betty Gaeng, Edmonds
historian, genealogist and wonderful friend passed away earlier this year. It was Ms. Gaeng's idea to
recognize the artists who are buried in the cemetery at this year's Walk Back in Time and she wrote a piece
on each artist. Ms. Longstaff plans to tell Ann Rutter's story at the Walk Back in Time this Thursday, July
20 at 1:00 p.m. at the Edmonds Cemetery. Bunny Hammersla who had a gallery in the 524 historic house
that owns featured Ann Rutter's work. She was delighted to be able to tell Ann's story along with the story
of her husband, retired Judge John Rutter. She encouraged people to bring pictures of Ann. The Cemetery
Board also plans to recognize Betty Gaeng at the Walk Back in Time.
Thatcher Boddendeitchel, Edmonds, a member of Carpenters Local 206, commented at the mayors
debate a few weeks ago, every candidate mentioned the importance of good infrastructure in Edmonds. He
agreed good infrastructure was very important, Edmonds is a beautiful city and we should strive to keep it
that way and continue beautiful growth. He referred to federal funds the state has available for housing,
commenting a lot of the buildings will be mixed use, apartments or condos over storefronts which is very
good for the economy. He encouraged the council to consider using union labor to build these buildings.
He recognized the tension with upzoning, noting union labor does so much related to the construction of
buildings. The Department of Transportation uses union labor, the light rail is being built with union labor
and he has seen numerous projects that enhance cities when they are built. He currently commutes to
Bellevue and before that he commuted to Des Moines; on his way, he passes non -union jobs within the City
of Edmonds. He would be proud to have the wealth his labor generates go to the economy that he
participates in, to have his labor build parks, housing and infrastructure, to be able to show his future
children what he built, and would love the city council to show their support. He referred to market share
recovery, a program offered by unions in the State of Washington that allows cities to dip their toe in the
water; get a bid from a non -union company and a bid from a union company and if the City choses the
union company over the non -union company, the union pays the difference in the bid cost.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 2
Packet Pg. 146
7.1.a
Brian Kelly, a member of the Carpenters Local 206, commented on the importance of keeping Edmonds'
money in Edmonds. Union carpenters who work in Edmonds will spend money in Edmonds. He concluded
if you go union, you can't go wrong. The members of Local 206 are here and ready to work.
Doug Sage, Edmonds, recognized Jack Evans in the audience who has lived on Olympic View Drive for
35 years just as his family has. Over those 35 years, traffic has increased in volume and has gotten more
aggressive and noisier. He encouraged the council to consider noise mediation and traffic calming. Olympic
View Drive is a collector street in a residential area and it is often difficulty for residents to get in and out
of their driveways. His house is across from the gated community Vista Del Mar and has a long driveway
with the mailbox on Olympic View Drive. When he stops to get his mail, regardless of the time of day, cars
behind him honk and tailgate. He notices speeding the most after 9 p.m., likely younger people driving fast
cars and motorcycles. Speeding on Olympic View Drive is dangerous to animals and pedestrians who cross
the street. He echoed Mr. Moon's comments.
6. RECEIVED FOR FILING
WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS
7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 27, 2023
2. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES JULY 5, 2023
3. APPROVAL OF PSPHSP COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES JULY 11, 2023
4. APPROVAL OF PPW COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES JULY 11, 2023
5. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE
PAYMENTS
6. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT
7. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT VEHICLE DONATION (LYNNWOOD HONDA)
8. BODY WORN CAMERA (BWC) REDACTION FEES
9. TREE BOARD MEMBER APPOINTMENT APPROVAL
10. BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION
11. BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION
12. BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION
13. BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION
14. BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION
15. BOARD/COMMISSION CANDIDATE APPOINTMENT CONFIRMATION
8. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. RESOLUTION INCREASING VEHICLE LICENSE FEE - TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT
DISTRICT
Public Works Director Oscar Antillon explained over the past few y ears revenues have not kept up with
expenses. He reviewed:
• Why?
o Street Fund Revenues and Expenses
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 3
Packet Pg. 147
7.1.a
Street Fund Revenues and Expenses
a=,sue
=ma aaip aw5 aea6 wr> >e�R aei9 aeaa aaai a�aa
--Fu Fyenses—.—I-dRci.—
• Authority
o RCW 82.80.140
o RCW 36.73.065
o RCW 36.73.010
Intent. The legislature finds that the citizens of the state can benefit by cooperation of
the public and private sectors in addressing transportation needs. This cooperation can be
fostered through enhanced capability for cities, towns, and counties to make and fund
transportation improvements necessitated by economic development and to improve the
performance of the transportation system.
It is the intent of the legislature to encourage joint efforts by the state, local
governments, and the private sector to respond to the need for those transportation
improvements on state highways, county roads, and city streets. This goal can be better
achieved by allowing cities, towns, and counties to establish transportation benefit districts in
order to respond to the special transportation needs and economic opportunities resulting
from private sector development for the public good. The legislature also seeks to facilitate
the equitable participation of private developers whose developments may generate the need
for those improvements in the improvement costs.
[ 2005 c 336 § 2; 1987 c 327 § 1.]
Effective date-2005 c 336: see note following RCW 36.73.015.
0 3.65.030 Functions of the city.
A. The city, by a majority vote of the city council, may authorize a motor vehicle license fee
as follows:
1. A vehicle fee of up to $20.00 per vehicle as provided for by RCW 82.80.140;
2. A vehicle fee of up to $40.00 as provided in RCW 82.80.140 if a vehicle fee of $20.00
has been imposed for at least 24 months; or
3. A vehicle fee of up to $50.00 as provided by RCW 82.80.140 if a vehicle fee of $40.00
has been imposed for at least 24 months and the city has met all the requirements of
RCW 36.73.065(6).
What is funded with this revenue?
o Edmonds City Coded 3.65.040 Transportation improvements funded. "The funds generated by
vehicle fees authorized by the city council in accordance with RCW 82.80.140 shall be used
solely for transportation improvements that preserve, maintain and operate the existing
transportation infrastructure of the city."
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 4
Packet Pg. 148
7.1.a
• 290 Lane MILES of roads
• 143 Linier miles of painted lines (painted yearly)
497 crosswalks that are applied with Hot Tape
(heat applied reflective markings)
• 4444 Hot Tape symbols i.e. tum arrows, stop
bars, HIC and such
• 25 signalized intersections
• 33 flashing signs
• 71 RRFB's (rectangular rapid flashing beacons)
located at crosswalks
• 24 school zone flashers (time of day flashing for
school times)
• 18 radar feedback signs to notify traveling public
of their speed
• 7823 signs ranging from Stop signs to 3hr
parking and everything in between.
• 59 City owns Street lights (cobra head
lighting)
• 26 City owned decorative lighting (Light post
In Downtown streets)
• 145 Locations that the City must do
vegetation control with the tractor mower.
• 6971 stormwater catch basins
• 1682 stormwater manholes
• 2309 stormwater culvert
• 632 detention systems, Bio Swales and Rain
gardens
• 140 lineal MILES of stormwater pipes.
• 56 creek crossings and areas checked
EVERY Friday to assure proper flow
• Photographs of public works crews working on streets
• Does increasing tab fees heln to advance council nriorities?
1. How can we reduce property crime in our city?
0
2. How can we improve public safety in high crime areas?
0
3. How can we add a police substation to Highway 99?
4. How can we significantly improve response to medical/fire emergencies at the
waterfront?
Q
5. How do we improve walkability in all neighborhoods?
Q
6. What are non -sidewalk safety methods to protect pedestrians and non -motorized
traffic?
Q
7. What can we do to reducespeeding on our streets?
0
8. How can we reduce speeding in key problem areas? 76t'', Olympic View Drive, 9'
Avenue, 190'9
21
9. How can we start leveraging our volunteers better?
10. Can we harness volunteer labor and knowledge for the benefit of our city/city
budget?
11. How can we improve our organizational structure to deliver better outcomes?
12. How can we improve the accountability of staff outcomes? (REDI manager, Code
rewrite, comp plan)
Q
13. How can we increase beautification in all business districts in Edmonds?
0
14. What can we do to increase direct human services to vulnerable populations in the
city, especial y Hwy 99?
15. What city buildings need repair or replacement in the near future and how can we
prioritize a list to fix them?
0
16. How can we increase our public green spaces and preserve our mature tree canopy?
17. How can we provide watercraft access to Lake Ballinger for our residents?
18. How can we evaluate consultant/ contractorspending to ensure prudent choices?
0
19. How do we determine the bests stem for electing Councilmembers in Edmonds?
20. How can we collect relevant and statistically valid data for informing decision
makers?
21. How do we work better with other south County regarding Ethics Boards?
22. How can we get trash collection service at SW County Park?
23. How do we deal with graffiti, trash and abandoned shopping cards around town?
0
24. How can we achieve a balanced budget without drawing down fund balances?
0
25. How can we have accuracy of questions andprojections?
a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 5
Packet Pg. 149
7.1.a
26. How can we prioritize ADA compliance throughout the city?
0
27. How can we accelerate street and sidewalk installation and maintenance?
0
28. How do we get positive environmental action on our waterways and creeks?
0
29. How can we fix the environmental issues in Perrinville?
0
• Street Fund Report (June)
2W
nw
j
e Current
Deficit
-$ 833,652
00
• Street Department
o Maintenance and Preservation Funds
Projected
End of Year
-$ 768,004
. TOO . FUe1 TAX . G-C.1 Fund . UnrU,,J d
• Funding options
Maintenance and Preservation Funds Maintenance and Preservation Funds
w/o additional fee with additional $20 fee
.780 • Fuel TA➢t • General Fund ■ TBD • Fuel TAX • General Fund
• Staff recommendation: Increase car tab fees by $20.
a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 6
Packet Pg. 150
City Attorney Jeff Taraday advised the ordinance in the packet is missing an effective date section. A
Section 3 needs to be added that reads, "This ordinance being an exercise of a power specifically delegated
to the city legislative body is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five days after passage and
publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title."
Councilmember Teitzel asked for clarification, if the council approves a $20 increase in the car tab fee, it
will generate approximately $700,000 annually. Mr. Antillon agreed. Councilmember Teitzel observed by
law that entire amount is required to be dedicated to street projects, and cannot be used for any other
purpose. Mr. Antillon answered the ordinance prevents using it for anything else. Councilmember Teitzel
said during this term as a councilmember as well as during his previous term, citizens have demanded great
streets and great safety. Although he was torn about an increase at any time for citizens, this fee has a
definite purpose and addresses an issue that citizens say they want. He concluded he has heard repeatedly
from citizens that streets and sidewalks are their priorities.
Councilmember Paine referred to the list of things that can be funded, commenting it can fund a lot of
things the community asks for, but it does not specifically say sidewalks, it is mainly street pavement. Mr.
Antillon agreed it was street pavement. Councilmember Paine commented the RCW is pretty explicit about
that. Mr. Antillon agreed, noting the City does spend some money on ADA features, but the City does not
own all the sidewalks. Councilmember Paine agreed with Councilmember Teitzel's comments that streets
are a priority for the community, safety is a public safety issue and the council hears daily about the need
to repair potholes. She asked if the new Fix It app was generating work orders for potholes. Mr. Antillon
answered the app was getting lots of reports regarding potholes. Councilmember Paine assumed that will
also be a good data collection device. Mr. Antillon agreed it was, commenting there were reports about
everything; it will be a learning process and staff is excited about it. Councilmember Paine commented new
technology provides new information which then expands the workload.
Mr. Taraday advised the council could disregard what he said previously about adding a section to the
ordinance; this a is resolution, not an ordinance and that language is not required.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented she has received 15-20 emails on this topic. She relayed a citizen's
question, the General Fund provides some funds for streets since the fee was not raised previously and
asked what happened if the council did not approve the increase, whether the General Fund would continue
to support streets as it has over the past four years. Mr. Antillon answered either less maintenance is done
or the General Fund provides approximately 50% of the necessary funding. It is a matter of priorities; the
General Fund has contributed $400,000-$2 million/year. Even with this increase, the contribution from the
General Fund will still be needed.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented this is a regressive tax and it should have come to the council in
2020, 2021 or 2022 because now the timing is wrong due to hyperinflation. At the two town halls, she heard
citizens say they are being priced out of their homes due to inflation and high taxes. Property taxes in
Snohomish County increased significantly in the past year. Further, this is premature and should be brought
up as part of the budget process.
Councilmember Chen referred to reports about traffic issues and heavier traffic, and recognized that traffic
calming requires resources as the General Fund cannot cover it all. This tax, like most taxes, is regressive,
but he recognized the need.
COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
ADOPT THE RESOLUTION TO RAISE THE CAR TAB FEE BY $20.
Councilmember Olson referred to the presentation slides with pie charts. She pointed out regardless of
whether the council approved the increase in the car tab fee, the City will spend the same amount on streets.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 7
Packet Pg. 151
7.1.a
Mr. Antillon agreed the pie charts illustrate the need. Councilmember Olson recognized that is a source of
frustration by the council and citizens; the council sees the need and hears that residents support spending
for this need. It is frustrating that the City is also spending a lot on projects that do not have as much resident
support and residents prefer to move money from those projects. She recognized the need for the TBD tax
for this purpose, but wanted the pie for streets to be bigger and to spend less General Fund monies in other
ways. It is important make this change and acknowledged that the current spending is not adequate. The
TBD fee has been not increased since 2008; approximately half the increase accounts for inflation to do the
same amount of work and there is a backlog. In the upcoming budget process, the council will be looking
for less other programs and more road work.
Councilmember Nand did not think a $20 or $40 vehicle licensing fee would break the bank for anyone,
but the problem is state government has chosen to fund itself on the backs of working and middle class
citizens in an effort to protect the incomes of very high net worth individuals. Even though this is a relatively
small ask, a small amount of what a person pays annual for their car tabs, it will be damaging to the budgets
of certain people in the community. The tax is regressive because a person earning a six figure salary and
driving a late model BMW pays the same tax from their income as a person earning minimum wage and
driving a 20 year old car. There is a push to raise revenue to address the City's new spending especially as
ARPA funds go away. After getting a lot of feedback from the community, she will offer an amendment
that will make her more comfortable to vote in favor of an increase in the car tab fee. She offered the
amendment in the spirit of vulnerable members of the community, some of whom may be living in their
cars and for whom this $20/year increase on top of the hundreds of dollars the state government is gouging
out of their income so they have the privilege of driving on the roads.
COUNCILMEMBER NAND MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO ADD A
NEW SECTION 2, RENUMBERING THE CURRENT SECTION 2 TO SECTION 3, THAT READS,
"ANY RESIDENT OF EDMONDS WHO IS ADVERSELY IMPACTED BY THIS INCREASE IN
FEES MAY APPLY FOR MONETARY RELIEF FROM THE ENTIRE $40 FEE COLLECTED AS
A CITY PORTION OF THE VEHICLE LICENSING FEE THROUGH THE CITY'S ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. ANYONE WHO HAS PREVIOUSLY QUALIFIED IN THE
LAST 24 MONTHS FOR SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (SNAP)
BENEFITS, ELECTRONIC BENEFIT TRANSFER (EBT) BENEFITS, HOUSEHOLD SUPPORT
THROUGH THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON APPLE HEALTH ALSO KNOWN AS
MEDICAID, OR A SECTION 8 HOUSING VOUCHER ADMINISTERED BY HASCO
AUTOMATICALLY QUALIFIES FOR A $40 REBATE ON THEIR VEHICLE LICENSING FEE
ISSUED AS A SEPARATE CHECK BY THE CITY OF EDMONDS ONCE THEY SUBMIT PROOF
OF QUALIFICATION FOR ONE OF THE ABOVE LISTED PROGRAMS AND EVIDENCE THEY
HAVE PAID THE $40 VEHICLE LICENSING FEE FOR A VEHICLE REGISTERED TO AN
ADDRESS LISTED IN THE CITY OF EDMONDS.
Councilmember Paine said she loves the amendment, her only comment would be not to specify HASCO,
and instead state any housing authority grant, because Everett Housing Authority still has the authority to
write housing grants in Edmonds.
Councilmember Buckshnis found the amendment wonderful, but said it likely would be very difficult to
administer. At the town hall meetings, she heard some people may be priced out by the vehicle license fee
increase, but may not qualify for the rebate. Without sufficient data, she was unsure she could support the
amendment.
Councilmember Olson said she liked the idea philosophically, but wanted to know what allowing rebates
would mean to what does/does not get done on the City's streets before voting on the amendment. She
asked if the council could pass the TBD fee increase tonight and revisit a program like Councilmember
Nand suggested. Mr. Antillon commented it would require Finance and Public Works to track the
information and a process would need to be developed. If council approved this, he did not think staff could
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 8
Packet Pg. 152
7.1.a
implement it because it would be too burdensome for staff. Councilmember Olson suggested revisiting
development of a program in the spirit of the amendment in the future.
Councilmember Nand thanked Councilmember Paine for offering the amendment related to Everett
Housing Authority providing housing vouchers in Edmonds. She thanked Councilmembers Buckshnis and
Olson and Mr. Antillon for their feedback. Creating an affirmative obligation for someone to seek out and
apply for this program, she anticipated it would be narrowly targeted to those for whom $40/year meant a
lot to their annual budget so she did not think thousands would apply. There are people in the community
utilizing the programs she mentioned in the amendment, people already connected to social services in
Edmonds and in Snohomish County, and this would just be another tool to help support marginalized and
vulnerable members of the community. Edmonds is a fairly pretty prosperous place; most people can afford
the increase to $40, but for the small number of people for whom this would have an adverse impact, this
could be very helpful for them. It is also an acknowledge that this is a regressive tax and should not be
impacting minimum wage workers the same as workers earning six figure incomes.
Councilmember Teitzel said he did not think he was supportive of the amendment tonight as he needed to
learn more about it. It needs more vetting with staff to ensure it can be done and is reasonable. He applauded
the notion and intent, but felt it was premature. He has heard from citizens if the council contemplates and
potentially approves an increase in the TBD fee, they want the entire amount dedicated to streets in addition
to the amount already dedicated. He supported the council committing to increasing the focus on funding
the street program.
Councilmember Chen applauded Councilmember Nand's intent to help people negatively impacted by the
increase. The City currently has a household support program, $2500/household, that residents can apply
for. Assistance is available and the City may need to advertise it more so residents are aware of its
availability. That $2500 could be used to cover this $20/year increase and much more. The $20 increase
will provide additional funds so the City's streets can be maintained; the funds will be dedicated for use on
City streets.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND
NAND VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL, BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING NO.
UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL, CHEN,
OLSON, PAINE AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS
BUCKSHNIS AND NAND VOTING NO.
2. AUTHORIZATION FOR MAYOR TO SIGN CONTRACT WITH VIA ARCHITECTURE
FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Planning Manager David Levitan reviewed:
• Comp Plan Scope and Contract review
o July 5 — Staff briefed city council on proposed scope and approach
o July 7 — Staff emailed community members who commented on Highway 99
o July 11 — Council committee further discussed scope and approach
o July 12 — Planning board provided feedback on and general support for scope and approach,
including consolidated EIS approach
o July 18 — Request additional feedback on scope of work and authorization for mayor to sign
contract with VIA
• Consultant RFP and selection process
o RFP issued in March and closed in late April; included optional task for Highway 99 SEIS
o City received four proposals, which were reviewed in early May
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 9
Packet Pg. 153
■ Two proposals included optional Highway 99 SEIS task (with different approaches)
■ Top two consultant teams were interviewed in mid -May (one with optional SEIS and one
without)
o Interview panel unanimously selected VIA Architecture Team
o City negotiated scope of work, budget and schedule, including:
■ Highway 99
■ Waterfront issues
■ Environment and natural resources
■ Economic development plan
■ Scale of outreach
o The Comp Plan will include all other mandatory elements (housing, transportation, climate
change/sustainability, utilities, capital facilities, etc.)
Scope of Work, Budget and Schedule
o VIA's scope and fee proposal ($650k) includes:
■ Production of the comprehensive plan document
■ Citywide EIS
■ Additional focus on the Highway 99 subarea, including dedicated community outreach,
potential plan/code refinements, and SEPA review
■ Development of an Economic Development Plan
■ Illustrative waterfront vision
■ Inclusive engagement with graphic -rich materials
o Contract active until plan is approved by Department of Commerce (by December 31, ,2024)
o Includes numerous touchpoints with boards/commission and the public including:
■ Five meetings with planning board and two meetings with city council in advance of public
hearing; staff will provide additional frequent updates
■ 2-3 meetings in each of the City's neighborhood commercial areas
■ Public EIS scooping and review meetings
■ Online engagement strategies
Questions/comments from council and planning board:
o Will the Highway 99 area receive the same level of SEPA review as a separate SEIS?
■ Staff and the consultant team are confident that this approach will provide the same level
of environmental review as would occur in a standalone EIS, perhaps more, considering
the citywide analysis that will afford a more systematic view
o What are the consultant travel costs and can they be included in the not to exceed contract
amount?
■ The maximum identified travel costs are —$3000 and would be utilized on a time and
materials basis. They will be included in the total contract amount. The bulk of the team is
based in Seattle.
o Concerns about specific community engagement components, such as a small group or 1 on 1
sessions
■ Stepherson and Associates will be developing a community engagement plan upon contract
approval; small group sessions will inherently be limited due to cost constraints
o Preference for Community Champions to apply and be selected (rather than appointed)
■ The Community Champions is intended to utilize professional staff from historically
underrepresented groups.
Next steps
o Finalize and approve contract with VIA
o Draft community vision statement public hearing (August 2) and additional community
outreach
o Form Community Champions steering committee
o Begin preparing background/technical analysis
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 10
Packet Pg. 154
7.1.a
Councilmember Paine asked if the Community Champions steering committee was the same as the
City/Steering Committee described in Section 1.1 of the scope of services. Mr. Levitan answered the
City/Steering Committee will be a staff level group. He anticipated there would be representation from
boards/commissions. Councilmember Paine appreciated building in a distinction regarding the environment
and the data driven statistically valid survey.
Councilmember Olson asked if a statistically significant survey had been added and where that was
referenced in the scope of services. Mr. Levitan answered it was referenced in the staff report and in the
context of developing the community engagement plan. A statistically valid survey is difficult to do, but if
that is a council priority, there could be focus as part of the development of the community engagement
plan on developing a framework and survey that would accurately reflect the community. Councilmember
Olson commented the timing of the survey is relevant. One of the deliverables was asking the community's
their priorities, something she wanted determined by a well -constructed, statistically valid survey.
Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin explained given the cost of a statistically valid survey,
the timing of the survey during the 1 %2 year process would need to be strategic. Consideration of a
statistically valid survey would be included in the development of the community engagement plan. A
statistically valid survey would be more valuable once the process gets into technical topics such as housing,
distribution of density, etc. to understand where the community stands before significant policy decisions
are made. Plans for a very robust outreach process are reflected in the fee proposal, looking at issues at the
neighborhood level as well as the citywide level and employing multiple outreach tactics. She was confident
community priorities could be gleaned via multiple conversations and other data points.
Councilmember Olson referred to the up to $3,000 for travel, and asked if that was part of the $649,000
fee. Ms. McLaughlin answered in the current fee proposal, it is separate, but based on council interest, it
can be included in the not to exceed amount which would increase the total cost of contract by $3,000.
Councilmember Olson recalled the council budgeted $400,000 for the base comprehensive plan update;
with the removal of the EIS and the Economic Development Plan based on the itemization, it is still about
$500,000. She asked why the cost was still $100,000 higher than budgeted. Ms. McLaughlin answered there
is a baseline of inclusive engagement and significantly more due to the hyper focus on the Highway 99 area
which added to the cost as well as project management included in each task. A lot of the costs associated
with the additional Highway 99 attention are in project management, overall outreach, production of
documents, etc.
Mr. Levitan said he would need to look at the budget approval as he was not with the City last fall when
the budget was prepared to see if the budget anticipated a full EIS. He referred to Shoreline and Mountlake
Terrace's consultant contracts; Shoreline's contract is about $450,000 and does not include the Highway
99 type work, community engagement consultant or an economic development plan. Mountlake Terrace's
budget is $500,000 which includes a full EIS, but does not include the equivalent of a subarea plan SEIS or
an economic development plan. He summarized the bulk of the additional amount is related to the Highway
99 area which was budgeted as a separate $200,000. Staff has not asked to utilize that full amount due to
cost savings from the combined approach to the EIS.
Councilmember Olson referred to page 12 of the contract, observing the total is $649,000 and subtracting
$111,000 for the Highway 99 PAO supplementary scope and $40,000 for the economic development vision
is approximately $500,000 which is still $100,000 in excess of the comprehensive plan update budget. Ms.
McLaughlin answered the budget is an estimate, made with limited information; the responses to the RFP
reflect the true cost. The reality is this is a significant scope of work. For example, the waterfront vision
would likely be a $100,000 effort if done separately. Councilmember Olson asked if the illustrative
waterfront vision was planning work or a fancy graphic model. Everyone agrees planning is needed, but
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 11
Packet Pg. 155
she questioned whether a big, fancy picture was needed and that may a place to save money. Ms.
McLaughlin commented creating a vision often requires inspiring people who do not typically think in a
future sense and the use of pictures and graphics helps to draw out the best ideas and outcomes. It will
inform the land use strategy, land use designations, densities, areas of preservation, rezone opportunities
relative to the marsh, etc. She concluded that process would include both.
Councilmember Olson commented the "up to" language related to engagement did not cover the council's
interests well. For example, up to five means doing one would meet the contract terms which she doubted
would be acceptable if five was the preferred number. She did not want to approve the contract with the
"up to" amounts and had sent an email to staff relaying that concern.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she sent several detailed questions to staff on July 7 and has not received
answers. She asked if all four consultants who responded to the RFP were out of state or only VIA. Mr.
Levitan answered the bulk of the VIA team is in Seattle; only the principal, who is not the project manager,
is out of state, the rest of the VIA team is local. The Herrera team is local, the economic development
consultant is based in Portland. With regard to the other consultants that responded to the RFP, one was
based entirely in Seattle with some staff in Vancouver, Washington, one was based out of Chicago, and one
was based in Seattle and the Bay area. He commented a lot of larger firms have multiple offices and utilize
staff from multiple locations.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she was extremely concerned about moving forward with this firm. This is
a comprehensive plan update that will include rewriting and visioning. The City already did visioning via
Everybody's Edmonds which the council was not part of. VIA's scope very convoluted, there is reference
to Highway 99 subarea focus, but the delivery documents do not include the Highway 99 subarea plan. The
economic development element is being prepared by a Portland consultant; it could be done by the EDC,
volunteers who understand Edmonds. She was having a difficult time with how the scope was put together
and believed the contract should be rejected and have Herrera do the EIS and SEIS. The council has yet to
see documents such as the Equitable Engagement Framework, the Five Corners Alternatives Analysis and
Fact Sheet, the Highway 99 Lake Ballinger Subarea Plan and PAO, Reimaging Neighborhoods and Streets
that are being provided to the consultant to create a vision when all that is necessary is updating the
comprehensive plan.
Councilmember Buckshnis continued, $650,000 is a lot of money. She did not think that much needed to
be spent when the comprehensive plan could be updated via an EIS and the SEIS as required by Ordinance
4079. She feared so much was being put into the scope that it was getting so convoluted with pretty pictures,
when in fact the comprehensive plan update needs to be completed by next year. That could be done by
updating the comprehensive plan and adding elements regarding the environment and climate change which
should not cost anywhere near $650,000. She reiterated her recommendation to reject the VIA contract and
have Herrera do the EIS and SEIS which would avoid the markup from VIA using them and the Portland
firm as a subcontractors.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not understand why everything was being combined; each element
of the update needs to be done well and not thrown together. She asked why staff decided to put everything
together. Ms. McLaughlin answered the scope included so much because there was budget allocation for
an economic development plan, the additional Highway 99 work, specificity and council direction about
including the waterfront plan as part of the comprehensive plan, and to consider a rezone of the marsh
property. A baseline comprehensive plan update is a significant body of work. She referred to
Councilmember Buckshnis' comments about the City's ability to handle 20-year growth from a utility
standpoint. That is a body of work that is incorporated into the comprehensive plan and requires significant
analysis. The council has also talked about city facilities, how the City can grow and provide resources to
the community, community centers, parks, where to house staff, etc. The capital facilities plan is also
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 12
Packet Pg. 156
7.1.a
included in this comprehensive plan update. The City's past updates have been quite slim and a
comprehensive EIS has not been done since 1995.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented Kirkland did not do a citywide EIS. The reason the council adopted
Ordinance 4079 was because developers would not use SEPA. The intent is to protect citizens in the
Highway 99 subarea which is why she supports doing an SEIS. Regarding the marsh rezone, the only thing
council has been asking the administration to since 2019 is remove the Edmonds Crossing from the
comprehensive plan which does not require visioning and could have been done in 2020 or 2021. She
preferred not to do anything related to the marsh because it is still in WSDOT's hands. She questioned
spending money to create a vision statement when in fact we know what it is going to be and Edmonds
Crossing just needs to be removed from the comprehensive plan. She agreed pretty pictures can be provided,
but it needs to be done by 2024 and convoluting everything and adding different elements does not save
money.
Councilmember Buckshnis suggested using BERK Consulting, a local firm that knows Edmonds, to do the
economic development plan. She expressed concern that the update did not utilize consultants that know
Edmonds and she did not want Edmonds to become an urban metropolitan area. Mr. Levitan advised staff
reached out to all the local consultants, but they indicated they did not have adequate staffing. Edmonds did
not receive proposals from the traditional update firms because they have been overwhelmed with work for
several years. BERK does a lot of work on housing action plans which has dominated their work for the
past few years including developing a plan for Lake Stevens when he worked there. The unavailability of
traditional update firms is reflected in the proposals the City received.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she asked for the RFP and RFQ. She suggested if everything hadn't been
combined into one RFP, the City may have received a better response. She expressed concern that the scope
was so convoluted that the end product would be like the PROS Plan which went off base and another
$150,000 had to be spent. She noted this $650,000 does not include updating the transportation element so
the entire comprehensive plan update will likely cost $800,0004900,000. Mr. Levitan said the difference
between this comprehensive plan update and other comprehensive plan updates that have happened in
Edmonds in the last 30 years is this is the first time the City has a large projected deficit in meeting its
housing growth targets. That is not just a minor comprehensive plan update, that is basically opening up
the entire comprehensive plan in a way he did not believe the City had done in the past several decades.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed, but said the comprehensive plan can be updated when HB 1110 is
implemented.
Council President Tibbott raised a point of order, advising Councilmember Buckshnis has had two touches
and asked two questions and it would be beneficial for other councilmembers to have an opportunity to
speak. Mayor Nelson concurred. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out Councilmember Olson asked more
than two questions. Mayor Nelson observed Councilmember Buckshnis was repeating the same argument
about her concern the proposal was convoluted and everyone understands her point. He suggested
Councilmember Buckshnis continue after other councilmembers have had an opportunity to speak.
Councilmember Nand commented this is her first time going through a comprehensive plan update, unlike
Councilmember Buckshnis who is an old hand at this. The City funds boards and commission so there are
residents of the community to provide feedback. They volunteer and spend dozens of hours per year;
multiple board/commission members have expressed to her that they feel invalidated and that their work
and input is being ignored. Tonight the council passed a regressive tax increase to cover new spending at a
time when the community is suffering financially. She knows the planning department works very hard and
did not want them to take her comments as personal criticism or her attempting to impugn their work; she
was trying to better understand what value the City would get from this contract.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 13
Packet Pg. 157
7.1.a
Councilmember Nand asked if VIA would be rewriting the entire comprehensive plan or updating the
existing plan. Mr. Levitan answered they will analyze the current plan. There may be goals and policies
that would remain. A periodic update checklist has been done to identify areas that are consistent with state
law; a number of things need to be updated as a result of the last couple legislative sessions. There would
be significant changes to a number of topics, but that will differ by topic area. He anticipated the housing
element, the land use element and potential map amendments and associated rezones will be the biggest
tasks and will require a lot of technical analysis. That is featured in the scope due to the scale and scope of
the changes that are required to be consistent with the GMA and countywide planning policies. He
acknowledged not every goal and policy in every element will be changed; there will definitely be carryover
goals and policies, but a significant amount of work will be required to review the existing goals and policies
and to check in with the community. He concluded it was difficult to generalize for every element; not
every goal and policy will be updated, but they will be reviewed to determine which ones stay and where
new language is required.
In terms of substance in the final product, Councilmember Nand asked how much of the comprehensive
plan document did staff expect to be new material generated by VIA by the end of the process. Mr. Levitan
answered it was difficult to say. The background analysis that goes into the first several pages of each
element will be new information because it is outdated. The goals and policies will be reviewed individually
and new goals and policies developed as needed to provide the regulatory framework for any potential
zoning changes or other implementation measures related to the comprehensive plan. The intent is to
develop a comprehensive plan policy document that provides the foundation. The comprehensive plan is a
good guide but it needs to provide a foundation for code implementation, implement ordinances, programs,
etc. All the background information will be updated to reflect current conditions.
Councilmember Nand asked for an estimate such as would 50% be new material generated by VIA. Ms.
McLaughlin answered it was impossible for staff to estimate at this time. Every policy in the document is
codependent on other policies; one change requires changing multiple references. Even the slightest change
requires comprehensive edits. For example, removing Edmonds Crossing, it is referenced at least 38 times
in the document as well as on maps, etc.
Councilmember Nand referred to a very detailed criticism of the VIA contract that she and other
councilmembers received. One of the points she found troubling was whether members of the community
champions steering committee would be residents of Edmonds. As a member of a historically
underrepresented community, the idea that someone is selected and has the ability to speak for the
community based on their diverse identity is something that people like her deal with frequently. She did
not want to proceed with the community champions being appointed and compensated in a way other than
a public process where candidates apply. If staff has already identified people they feel would be good
participants, she suggested they go through a public application process. She wanted to ensure the selection
of the community champions steering committee was done in the most respectful, transparent and open way
possible.
Ms. McLaughlin encouraged councilmembers to reach out to staff with any questions. The equitable
engagement framework suggests a community champions model; that structure has not been formed, a list
of members has not been compiled, no one has been invited to participate, etc. That will be done as part of
the engagement plan which will be shared and transparent. She assured that was not accurate information
that Councilmember Nand heard. Councilmember Nand said that is why she wanted to share the criticism
so staff can get ahead of it. She would hate for people to be engaged in the process and then read in the
media they are not really members of the community or that they were given an unfair leg up because of
their diverse or minority status,
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 14
Packet Pg. 158
7.1.a
Councilmember Nand expressed concerned with the push to roll the Highway 99 SEIS into a citywide EIS.
The reason there was a subarea plan with very tall building heights was because in 2017 the council agreed
with the planning department that Highway 99 deserved a streamlined approach for permitting new projects.
The council has now heard a tidal wave of anger from that community because applications and permits for
new projects are being approved and residents are concerned with giant buildings being constructed in their
backyard without being informed that changes to the zoning had occurred. She encouraged the council to
pursue a separate Highway 99 SEIS or at least discussion in the upcoming public hearing where feedback
on the comprehensive plan update and visioning will be pursued.
Councilmember Nand suggested consideration be given to separating out certain items. She asked what
value the City gets from Task 3.2, Economic Development — Existing Conditions Review, and how it plays
into the need for a comprehensive plan update. She was trying to categorize tasks and justify the price tag
for each item the City was hiring VIA for. Mr. Levitan answered typically when developing a plan or vision,
an existing conditions report needs to be done first to provide the technical foundation for the economic
development vision. It is not superfluous, it is intended to inform that plan and vision and would utilize Mr.
Tatum and his team as well as the EDC to provide feedback. He summarized it is the technical background
information for the economic development plan.
Council President Tibbott observed the state has imposed new housing requirements and as a result, new
zoning will be required in the City. As more housing comes on line and there is more population, there will
be new infrastructure needs and new utility requirements as well as new amenities for a growing population.
He noted this is not just an update, it is also accommodating the requirements placed on the City by other
entities. It sounds great that everything was put everything together in one package. Once everything is put
together and the comprehensive plan is written, he asked how that helps the City accomplish its goals. Ms.
McLaughlin answered many headaches and heartaches are due to outdated policies or approaches or
disconnects related to Edmonds Crossing, how to move forward with desirable land use, etc.; the
comprehensive plan provides a north star. The point of GMA is to provide a vision, an alignment for growth
and transportation to guide the City over the next 20 years. Once the City has that planning framework,
zoning amendments can effectuate those changes. That consistency allows for a smoother operating City
and clear expectations for stakeholders including private development, business owners, residents, etc.
Mr. Levitan explained the key term in the comprehensive plan is comprehensive; the comprehensive plan
establishes a policy framework and prioritization and reflects community feedback for not just zoning
changes but program development. Funding decisions by the city council utilizing the community
engagement is the hidden value of the comprehensive plan, it goes above and beyond GMA and countywide
planning policies compliance by providing a roadmap for the future. The City's growth targets and recent
legislation will require a fundamental reassessment in the way the City looks at things like housing.
Although not part of this contract, examining multimodal level of service in a completely different way is
reflected in the budget for that contract. Having a consultant team to tie all these things together is the value
of this consultant team and their proposal. Staff is generally comfortable with the SEPA approach, the
policy approach, the engagement approach, etc.
Council President Tibbott referred to an EIS for the entire City, commenting the environmental impact on
Highway 99 impacts others parts of the City and vise versa. For example, the City may make a
transportation change in one area of the City, but it can push traffic to the Highway 99 corridor. A citywide
EIS allows those issues to be addressed citywide and there are still plans for robust engagement for the
Highway 99 area. He concluded it seemed synergistic to him. Mr. Levitan explained when developing
alternatives for the comprehensive plan EIS, it obviously looks at the entire City. The proposal is for two
alternatives plus a no action alternative, although no changes to land use designations, zone capacity, or
zoning would not be an option because the City would be out of compliance with state law and not meet its
growth targets.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 15
Packet Pg. 159
7.1.a
Mr. Levitan continued, alternatives need to consider the growth targets; there are currently about 3,000
units of zone capacity in the Highway 99 area that has not been utilized through the PAO, only about 400
units of the 3,325 have been spoken for. That zone capacity is based on 2015 growth targets that extended
to 2035. Since then, Edmonds' projected population for the 2044 horizon is expected to be 55,000-56,000,
almost 10,000 more than was anticipated in 2015 which is a major change. It is difficult to look at the
Highway 99 area in a vacuum to accommodate up to 9,000 additional units within the City. Walling off
Highway 99 and evaluating only the Highway 99 area in a SEIS and saying there should not be any
additional zone capacity in Highway 99 would require those 9,000 units to be spread out through the rest
of the City. A lot of them should be spread out through the City which will considered in the update
including looking at the housing commission recommendations related to middle housing beyond what is
required by HB 1110, courtyard apartments, etc. That is the reason staff and the consultant have proposed
this consolidated approach. It is difficult to analyze a specific subarea in the context of a full comprehensive
plan EIS and it would be difficult to do them concurrently.
Councilmember Teitzel said he did some research into VIA, looking into their portfolio of work, and it
appears they are a credible firm that has done work relevant to what Edmonds is asking for. He was also
comforted by their plan to work with Herrera Environmental, who is familiar with Edmonds, on the
environmental components. He referred to his email exchange with Ms. McLaughlin regarding Ordinance
4079 and whether council should rescind it and her indication that staff was not suggesting council could
or should rescind it. He read from their email, "The city council would also have the option to rescind the
planned action ordinance and instead rely on project level environmental review until an updated SEIS is
prepared." He asked what staff meant by that.
Ms. McLaughlin answered staff has the level of confidence that this is the right way to integrate the work
into the citywide EIS for the purpose of a system wide analysis that is needed for equity and balance and to
ensure the City has the capacity in zoning, utility and transportation to accommodate growth in an equitable
way. Staff is confidence in the approach that is outlined and in the proposed contract with VIA. Staff is
saying trust us, but if council doesn't, at the end of the analysis, there will still be the opportunity to rescind
or amend the subarea plan or the corresponding planned action EIS. That is still an option so the council
may as well see what community members want at a depth that can be analyzed relative to the systems and
then make a very intentional decision whether a citywide EIS captures what is wanted. That is the most
efficient way to get there, but at the end of the day, if the council wants to change the planned action and
the subarea plan, that is the time to do it. She was confident in the approach of an integrated effort.
Councilmember Teitzel asked if Ordinance 4079 remains in effect and the City proceeds with this
consolidate planning approach, whether that approach was in violation of the ordinance. Mr. Levitan asked
what part of the ordinance the City would be in violation of. Councilmember Teitzel said in terms of the
approach to the Highway 99 subarea. Mr. Levitan said Ordinance 4079 requires a 5-year check -in which
was done in October 2022. The specific language in the ordinance delegates authority for determining the
need for a supplemental environmental review to the SEPA responsible official which is the planning
manager. Former Planning Manager Kernen Lien prepared a document last fall in which he determined a
supplemental EIS was not needed. The council still budgeted for and requested an SEIS be done. In
consulting with a number of firms and with VIA, it was determined a SEIS was not needed. Ordinance 4079
does not calls for the preparation of a SEIS, only supplemental environmental review as needed and
determined by the SEPA responsible official.
Councilmember Teitzel said in his opinion, the City has not done justice to ADA issues. The scope of work
is silent related to ADA. He asked if that could be added. Ms. McLaughlin advised the transportation plan
was the most likely place for an ADA-related scope of work. That is not part of this scope of work, but staff
will be working closely with the transportation plan and will need to be consistent with all the elements of
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 16
Packet Pg. 160
7.1.a
the comprehensive plan. The capital facilities plan will touch on ADA needs, but typically that level detail
would be in a granular plan rather than comprehensive plan elements such as an ADA transition plan or as
part of the CIP/CFP.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to Task 2.2.1 Highway 99/Lake Ballinger Subarea Focused Engagement
The team will conduct 3-meetings with Highway 99 community supporting the 6t' neighborhood
commercial center at Lake Ballinger to coordinate the subarea plan with the comprehensive plan, and
address community concerns and opportunities. He asked about the 6' neighborhood commercial center at
Lake Ballinger and whether that was the Burlington Coat Factory property. Mr. Levitan said VIA has
identified six neighborhoods of focus and combined the Lake Ballinger and Highway 99 area to overlap
with the subarea boundaries. He offered to clarify that with VIA. That task addresses an additional
engagement effort to learn about perceived impacts and issues identified by community members in those
areas. Councilmember Teitzel asked if it was referring specifically to the Burlington Coat Factory property.
Mr. Levitan answered it was not.
Councilmember Chen observed the housing bills passed by the legislature will result in dramatic change
for Edmonds and he saw the value of comprehensively updating the comprehensive plan. The $650,000 fee
is a heavy price tag; Phase 1, project management, meetings and community engagement appears to cost
$142,000. He asked if there was an opportunity to save money by using planning board members or
volunteers to conduct some of those tasks. Mr. Levitan answered there is a different dynamic when utilizing
consultants with specific expertise in community engagement in the way meetings are run and community
outreach. He suggested council provide direction regarding a specific dollar amount they were seeking and
he could look through the scope to determine how to utilize existing community resources.
Councilmember Chen referred to Councilmember Olson's comments that the original budget was $400,000
and with the additional items, it was about $500,000, but the current fee is $650,000, about $150,000 over
budget, so there is room for cost saving opportunities. Ms. McLaughlin asked for clarification regarding
Councilmember Chen's suggestion to utilize planning board members, and whether he was suggesting
instead of community meetings, discussing topics at planning board meetings, or having planning board
members host and do the legwork for the community meetings.
Councilmember Chen suggested the consultant could provide the structure and the volunteers could do the
legwork, host the meetings, etc. to avoid consultant travel costs to conduct meetings. Ms. McLaughlin
commented planning board members are volunteers, and they already do quite a lot on their own time. She
was uncomfortable asking volunteers to do as much legwork as she knew community engagement takes.
An inclusive engagement process costs a lot and she suggested discussing the value of an inclusive
engagement process and the value of neighborhood level conversations. It costs money to prepare specific
neighborhood materials. There could be a process where public engagement occurs at planning board or
city council meetings, but she did not think it would meet the inclusive engagement goals.
Councilmember Chen commented there are already extensive resources from the 2017 subarea plan, the
work done by the housing commission as well as other existing resources; the wheel does not need to be
recreated for every aspect. Ms. McLaughlin explained after doing this for decades, when people aren't
engaged and the City relies on a 2017 document, people who were not engage in 2017 now want to be part
of the conversation. The City cannot rely on old planning efforts and needs to continue to involve
community members in the process of making real time decision to build trust and a community vision for
the 20-year strategy to ensure it is inclusive. She empathized with the frustration; there were 8,500
comments during the visioning process, but the City still needs to commit to an inclusive engagement
process which takes time and money.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 17
Packet Pg. 161
Councilmember Chen referred to the comprehensive, in-depth visioning process and questioned the need
to continue to spend more money on that process. Ms. McLaughlin used middle housing as an example,
that wasn't part of the level of granularity that people were asked about in the visioning process. People
were asked what they valued about Edmonds and how it shaped the vision for the comprehensive plan.
Now the City needs to get into a level of detail with community members about specific housing and
transportation needs which is different than the value conversation.
Councilmember Chen saw the value of the long term comprehensive plan and asked how the recent
Highway 99 landmark acquisition fits into the comprehensive plan. Ms. McLaughlin answered the
landmark site is zoned CG which allows the most flexibility and highest density in the City. Conversations
around land use and density as it relates to the recent housing bills will affect the landmark site if the City
choses to downzone certain aspects of Highway 99. While the comprehensive plan won't master plan that
site, that will be a separate process, the two will go hand -in -hand. Councilmember Chen commented that is
somewhat contradictory, on one hand the City is doing long term comprehensive planning and the other is
let's do this. Ms. McLaughlin explained the assumption for the landmark site is CG zoning and planning
will move forward with that assumption. The City is not waiting for the comprehensive plan update to
advance on that site. Councilmember Chen said the landmark acquisition is contradictory to long term
planning. Mayor Nelson suggested councilmembers keep their comments to the agenda topic.
Councilmember Chen asked what happens if council rejects this contract. Mr. Levitan asked for
clarification if Councilmember Chen was asking what happens if the council asks staff to refine the scope
or if the council is not comfortable with this team and this approach. Councilmember Chen answered
probably refine it. Mr. Levitan explained the comprehensive plan update needs to be completed by
December 31, 2024. If the council is not comfortable with the contract or the team, then something needs
to be figured out asap and go with a different approach because that deadline is looming. A good amount
of the work, vision outreach and the legwork on housing bill implementation has been done, but the update
process needs to start. If a consultant was not hired for another several months, it would make it difficult to
meet the December 31, 2024 deadline.
Councilmember Paine commented all but 3 of the 11 items in the RFP were produced in last 5 years and
are not reflected in the City's current comprehensive plan such as the gap analysis and equitable engagement
framework. It is important for the City to continually ask the community for input. The City has great
volunteers who do a lot of work for the City, but the community will lose trust if the City does not
continually check in with them. She referred to the Gateway community as an example, an effort that
occurred in 2017. Other items in the RFP include the climate action plan, waterfront issues study, the
housing needs study, the citizens housing commission policy recommendations, reimaging neighborhoods
and streets, the PROS plan and the shoreline master plan. If the council rejects this contract, she assumed
those same things will need to be incorporated into the comprehensive plan.
Councilmember Paine continued, the 8,500 comments from Everybody's Edmonds were amazing but
engagement from the broader community is still necessary; otherwise the City loses the community's trust
and the City ends up with moratoria. The state has handed cities a big body of work to incorporate. The
comprehensive plan began with housing and transportation and now includes the environment. She was
concerned there would not be enough time to update the comprehensive plan which would result in short
shrift which the City has suffered from in last comprehensive plans. She was surprised the City had not
done a comprehensive EIS since 1995. That was unfair to the community and she was dismayed at that gap.
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT, TO
ACCEPT THE PLAN AND CONTRACT AS WRITTEN FOR VIA ARCHITECTS FOR THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 18
Packet Pg. 162
7.1.a
Councilmember Paine commented this is an important step and the council will have time during the year
to finetune things. This is a not to exceed amount contract. If there are ways to mobilize volunteers, that
can be done. If the council does not approve this contract, it will take another six weeks to get another RFP
out and then the council will be in the midst of the budget. She urged councilmembers to consider this very
good contract and the need to get started.
Council President Tibbott was confident in the work staff did to develop the scope and the cost is within
the range of what other cities are spending on their comprehensive plans. The additional work to engage
the Ballinger area is justified and desirable. The update also incorporates new requirements from the state
and Snohomish County. If there is a possibility of saving money by not doing something if there is already
enough information, he encouraged staff to remove it.
Councilmember Buckshnis said council has not been given a lot of the information. The comprehensive
plan gap analysis by Echo NW outlines everything that needs to be changed. She asked why the City did
not continue using them. Mr. Levitan answered they did not apply; their focus is on the gap analysis and he
had not seen them prepare a full comprehensive plan update. Councilmember Buckshnis asked how much
the City paid for the gap analysis report and why was it not provided to council. Ms. McLaughlin advised
the equity gap analysis was on the council agenda in Received for Filing. She offered to distribute it again
and/or do a presentation. It is background information to provide a sense of the scope as it related to some
of the new state bills. She did not know the cost off the top of her head.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed it had been added to the website and she was glad staff had added the
8,500 tweets to the website.
Council President Tibbott raised a point of order, requesting councilmembers speak to the motion. Mayor
Nelson agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was looking at the background documents and the
scoping and suggested some needed to be pulled out because they had not been vetted by the citizens or the
council.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
REMOVE THE EQUITABLE ENGAGEMENT FRAMEWORK.
Councilmember Buckshnis said it had not been brought to the council and she could not find it on the
website. This is an important document that council should review before it is provided to the consultant
and they spend money reading it.
Councilmember Olson said that was one of things she had not seen and agreed it should be removed. She
will vote in favor of the amendment.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL,
BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE AND NAND AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING NO.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
PULL THE EDMONDS WATERFRONT ISSUES STUDY.
Councilmember Buckshnis recalled this was presented to council and councilmembers had numerous issues
with it. The council requested it be updated and errors corrected and returned to council. She did not want
to provide documentation to the consultant that was inaccurate and that the council wanted revised.
Council President Tibbott relayed his understanding that the council wanted to have Makers come back,
but they were not available to continue work on that document. He suggested this was the opportunity to
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 19
Packet Pg. 163
7.1.a
take that plan to the next level to have a complete waterfront plan. Ms. McLaughlin recalled in previous
council meetings she has expressed willingness to bring the report back for discussion and/or editing and
has suggested scheduling it on the extended agenda. It is a background document that will serve
development of the waterfront plan. Council President Tibbott relayed his understanding VIA would help
with the additional information. Ms. McLaughlin advised Makers is no longer on contract related to the
waterfront issues paper. Insignificant edits to the document could be made administratively; more
substantial edits could be addressed in the waterfront plan itself. Council President Tibbott said that was
the benefit of including it in VIA's scope.
Councilmember Olson relayed there were not multiple things wrong with the waterfront issues study but
recalled she did not agreed with one of the recommendations which is why she wanted it to come back to
council. To the point Councilmember Buckshnis made that it is not a good idea for VIA to spend time
reading the report until council makes those modifications, she suggested council have an opportunity to
make the changes before VIA utilizes it. She did not necessarily want it removed from the scope, but wanted
the final document to be what council agreed to.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS AND
TEITZEL VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE, OLSON AND NAND AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING NO.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to reimaging neighborhood and streets in the list of background
documentation and materials, commenting she has not seen it, did not know what it meant, and did not want
it provided to the consultant for review before the council has vetted it.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
REMOVE REIMAGING NEIGHBORHOOD AND STREETS.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-3), COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL, CHEN,
BUCKSHNIS AND OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT AND
COUNCILMEMBERS PAINE AND NAND VOTING NO.
Councilmember Nand referred to Task 3.1, Project Understanding and Existing Conditions Review, and
asked if the City was billed an hourly rate or a flat fee for the consultant's review of background
information. Mr. Levitan answered it was a flat fee on a time and materials basis. If it did not require the
full amount of time, the consultant would not bill the full amount. Councilmember Nand observed the City
was being billed on hourly basis. Mr. Levitan said there is an estimated amount of time they believe it will
take to review these documents.
Councilmember Nand said Councilmember Buckshnis is attempting to refine the scope which
Councilmember Chen was also in favor of. Other tasks and subtasks could be refined and potentially have
less impact than removing these documents. She asked how many hours were allocated to this review and
what the cost savings from removing them would be. Ms. McLaughlin said the documents and materials
allow the consultant to be well versed on the breadth of things that are of recent interest to the community.
Inevitably they will need to review these documents anyway as they get into specific topics.
Councilmember Nand said that was her assumption. She referred to the $92,000 for community
engagement, specifically $21,000 for meetings with the planning board and city council, and $9,000 for
engagement with community champions and asked if there were ways to utilize boards and commissions
and other community stakeholders to do more volunteer work. She reiterated several board and commission
members have expressed frustration that they feel underutilized. She appreciated the point Councilmember
Buckshnis is trying to make by removing these item, however, if she was in the consultant's shoes, these
are documents she would want to review. She preferred to refine other budget items in the contract instead
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 20
Packet Pg. 164
7.1.a
of removing background information. Mr. Levitan asked for clarification that the motions to remove
documents was intended for the consultant not to review or utilize the documents at all or just not until they
were brought before council. Councilmember Olson answered until they had been approved by council.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed concern that the consultant may be provided information the council
has never seen or vetted or that needs to be corrected.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
REMOVE FIVE CORNERS ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS AND FACT SHEET.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented this is probably six years old and it never come before the public,
the planning board or any other boards for review so it is premature for the consultant to review.
Councilmember Chen understood Councilmember Buckshnis' intent was to reduce costs, however, these
are important historical documents related to the City that the consultant needs to be aware of. He asked if
there was a way to deliver the message differently. He referred to Task 3 under Phase 2, Project
Understanding and EIS Scoping $50,000 and suggested having the experts brief the consultants instead of
them reviewing the documents and possibly having a different interpretation because they are from
California and don't know Edmonds. He suggested taking the consultant on a tour of the City. Ms.
McLaughlin answered for staff to synthesize this list and present on it would be a significant amount
compared to the consultant flipping through documents which is what planners do. Whether they are in
Seattle or Dubai, a consultant needs an overview of all the relevant documents before beginning a plan. It
is a scan, an awareness; as they get into topical meetings with stakeholders, community members, agency
partners, etc., their awareness of a document allows them to reference it at a different depth. Councilmember
Chen reiterated his concern with the $50,000 cost.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she wanted to keep the Revisioning Westgate document because the City
did an extensive public process for Westgate which was not done for Five Corners. The Five Corners study
was done by the University of Washington and never came to council. It has been on the shelf for years and
she did not think information should be provided to the consultant that has not had policy or legislative
review.
Councilmember Nand proposed the planning department revise the scope and propose a more streamlined
and less expensive alternative to the present scope with items that could be compressed or refined without
damaging the quality of work from the consultant. She suggested reducing the scope by $100,000-$200,000.
Council President Tibbott raised a point of order, suggesting councilmembers speak to the amendment.
Mayor Nelson ruled point taken.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (2-5), COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS AND
TEITZEL VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, PAINE, OLSON AND NAND AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING NO.
Councilmember Nand asked if it would be possible for the planning department to prepare an alternative
scope and budget for engagement with VIA that is $100,0004200,000 less than the proposed contract by
removing or compressing items from the present scope. Ms. McLaughlin answered staffs job is to bring
the council a contract that meets the need as well as is the most fiscally conservative. The scope has been
refined and negotiated. Reducing it by $100,000 would result in significant changes to what would be
delivered in the comprehensive plan update and she would be wildly uncomfortable doing that without very
specific council direction about what they were willing to give up. Understanding GMA and everything
that has significantly changed since 1995 and the 2023 legislative session, the change in growth targets, the
complexity of Highway 99 and expectations of community members, she did not know how the cost could
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 21
Packet Pg. 165
7.1.a
be reduced and if it could, it would be $20,000 and it would delay the process another month. She
summarized time is money and this is the best scope with the funding available.
Councilmember Nand said since staff is directly engaged with the consultant and have the expertise and
background, her preference would be for staff to determine what a skinny version of this contract looks like
that would still produce effective deliverables. Mayor Nelson translated Ms. McLaughlin's comments; this
is the skinny version. Ms. McLaughlin agreed.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT, TO
ADD UNDER TASK 2.1, "NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC WILL BE MADE TO RECRUIT THE
COMMUNITY CHAMPIONS AND SELECTIONS WILL BE MADE FROM THE APPLICANTS."
Councilmember Olson commented there was nothing in the contract that stated that would happen, but it is
something she wants and has heard the community wants.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Olson referred to "The Consultant will host up to two focused rounds..." in Task 2.2,
Neighborhood Community Meetings, and suggested "one to two" so zero meetings would not be an option.
Ms. McLaughlin agreed with the change.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
REVISE TASK 2.2 TO READ, "THE CONSULTANT WILL HOST UP TO TIALO ONE TO TWO
FOCUSED ROUNDS..." AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Olson referred to the paragraph in red at the top of page 3 of the contract, pointing out it
does not refer to the environmental impacts. She suggested adding "environmental impacts" to the list in
parentheses. Mr. Levitan suggested modifying the paragraph to read, "Materials will address potential
environmental impacts..." pointing out analysis of environmental impacts is the focus of the SEPA review
process. The list refers to specific types of mitigation measures, not the environmental impacts.
Councilmember Olson reiterated the paragraph does not address the environment which is a major point.
Ms. McLaughlin explained 2.2.1 has two paragraphs, the first is regarding engaging the community on
broader issues that may be relevant to the subarea, and the second paragraph is incorporating the community
feedback into environmental analysis and potential impacts. She recommended leaving the paragraph as is
other than Mr. Levitan's suggestion to change to first sentence on page 3 to read, "Materials will address
potential environmental impacts..."
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO
MODIFY THE FIRST SENTENCE IN THE SECOND PARAGRAPH IN TASK 2.2.1 TO READ,
"MATERIALS WILL ADDRESS POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS..."
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Task 2.2.1, Highway 99/Lake Ballinger Subarea Focused
Engagement, pointing out Lake Ballinger is not part of the subarea. Ms. McLaughlin answered the first
paragraph in Task 2.2.1 states for the purpose of neighborhood conversations in six neighborhood districts,
the Lake Ballinger area will be included with the Highway 99 subarea. The citywide EIS will include
environmental analysis for the City as a whole.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Highway 99 Lake Ballinger Subarea Plan and PAO in the list of
documents in Task 3.1, noting Lake Ballinger is not part of the subarea plan or the PAO.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 22
Packet Pg. 166
7.1.a
Councilmember Nand asked if adding "environmental" would address climate change and climate action,
specifically extreme weather events and impermeability. Mr. Levitan said climate change impacts would
be looked at on a citywide level and would not be a focus of a specific neighborhood. Obviously areas with
taller buildings along transportation corridors may experience heat island effects that do not occur as much
in other areas, but he anticipated "environmental" would cover that. Staff could advise the consultant that
environmental includes analysis of climate change.
Councilmember Nand expressed interest in an analysis of shade equity impacts created by tall buildings,
increased impermeable surface, and tree removal and asked if that needed to be specifically called out in
the contract. Mr. Levitan commented the City is the client and can inform the consultant what should be
considered. It is difficult to provide the level of specificity for each topic. He suggested if that was a concern,
the wording could be changed to "environmental including impacts of climate change and required
adaptation and mitigation." He anticipated the City had enough discretion that staff could direct the
consultant team to look at that. Ms. McLaughlin advised a citywide tree canopy assessment was done
recently and presented to council, possibly before Councilmember Nand was appointed. It would be
relevant to include that on the list of existing conditions documents that will feed into the policy. That
would be the best way to address that versus the environmental methodology which typically does not have
as much focus on climate change resilience.
Councilmember Nand commented the reason councilmembers were struggling with the scope was they
were not sure what the deliverable would be in the final product for the cost of the contract.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT, TO
AMEND THE SECOND ASSUMPTION IN 2.2.1 TO READ, "ALL DIRECT EXPENSES... ROOM
RENTAL WHEN CITY FACILITIES ARE NOT AVAILABLE... ".
Councilmember Olson wanted to ensure the consultant was aware of the expectation that they should use
City facilities to avoid the cost of rentals.
Councilmember Paine said that was already covered in the fourth bullet which states neighborhood
meetings may leverage City events and the City may provide support for logistics and facilitation.
Councilmember Olson said that did not address her concern. Councilmember Paine commented the
language Councilmember Olson suggested could result in the consultant paying for a City building versus
having a free event at a church.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NAND, TO ADD
THE TREE CANOPY ASSESSMENT PER DIRECTION FROM DIRECTOR MCLAUGHLIN.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL,
REFERRED TO THE HIGHWAY 99 LAKE BALLINGER SUBAREA PLAN AND PAO AND
REQUESTED "LAKE BALLINGER" BE REMOVED.
Councilmember Buckshnis advised Lake Ballinger not part of the subarea plan or included in Ordinance
4079.
Councilmember Paine objected to having Highway 99, the Lake Ballinger subarea plan or the PAO
removed as they were essential components and removing them would be inequitable.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 23
Packet Pg. 167
7.1.a
Council President Tibbott asked if there was a neighborhood map. Mr. Levitan said that was a typo, the
subarea plan and the PAO do not cover Lake Ballinger. Staff can tell the consultant that that reference was
incorrect.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT,
TO ADD THE URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AS A DOCUMENT.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented if the tree canopy assessment is included, the consultant should also
see the Urban Forest Management Program which addresses issues such as shading, etc.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
ADD THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASPECT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
Council President Tibbott asked whether that would already be included in the scope of work. Mr. Levitan
answered yes, it would be included as part of the update, but there was no harm in clarifying.
Councilmember Paine advised that is addressed in Task 3.2, Economic Development — Existing Conditions
Review.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she did not see economic development in the list of documentation or that
there are plans to update the economic development element. There is more to economic development
existing conditions review than just barriers to middle housing and assessing real estate development
patterns so even though it is implied, it is best to have it included so it is clear that the consulting should
consider the economic development element. Ms. McLaughlin suggested adding review of the entire
comprehensive plan rather than a specific chapter.
Councilmember Olson asked if there was value to adding review of the economic development element
under Task 3.2. Ms. McLaughlin preferred to include review of the entire existing comprehensive plan in
Task 3.1, Project Understanding and Existing Conditions Review. Amending the scope to itemize review
of each chapter is unnecessary.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented there is inconsistency because the 2023 Climate Action Plan which
is GHG specific was docketed. She wanted to ensure the consultant considered other issues related to
economic development and not just barrier housing and real estate development.
Councilmember Chen cautioned the addition of documents to the consultant's workload will increase the
$650,000 fee.
Councilmember Nand asked the consultant's billable hourly rate. Ms. McLaughlin answered it varies based
on the task and the level of professional doing that task. Councilmember Nand asked the range. Mr. Levitan
said he did not have their full proposal in front of him. Councilmember Nand commented it would be
helpful to have an understanding of how much these edits were saving. Ms. McLaughlin advised the
contract did not identify the staff member responsible for each task. Councilmember Nand said the dollar
amounts in the contract are based on a presumption of a certain number of hours at a certain rate. Mr.
Levitan agreed, explaining this was meant to reflect a holistic assessment of conditions, especially more
recent analysis that has been done in Edmonds to provide a foundation for the policy document and guide
the community engagement. Tasks are typically estimated and then billed at an hourly rate on a time and
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 24
Packet Pg. 168
7.1.a
materials basis. If a task does not take as long as the consultant estimated, they do not bill the entire amount.
Ms. McLaughlin observed the council has added some items and removed some items and she did not
expect it would change the not to exceed dollar amount.
Councilmember Nand observed staff did not have the range for the hourly rate. Mayor Nelson requested
the council keep the discussion to the amendment. Councilmember Nand said she was not comfortable
voting on amendments that change the scope if the council did not have an understanding of the financial
impact based on the consultant's hourly rates.
Councilmember Olson asked if amendment was to add the economic development chapter or the entire
comprehensive plan. Councilmember Buckshnis advised it was the economic development chapter.
UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-2-1), COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL,
BUCKSHNIS, OLSON AND PAINE VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBER CHEN AND COUNCIL
PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING NO; AND COUNCILMEMBER NAND ABSTAINING.
Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out the state passed legislation requiring climate change components
be added to the comprehensive plan. The City's climate action plan is GHG centric and does not address
sea level rise, carbon sequestering, tree canopy, etc. She asked whether the climate change element would
be GHG specific or would it address those other issues. Mr. Levitan advised an element would be developed
that was consistent with state law and best management practices. The existing sustainability element was
updated in 2020; information from the updated CAP will be incorporated. The CAP is not the same as the
climate change and sustainability element so a wider variety of issues will be considered.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
EXTEND THE MEETING TO 10:20. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO
REMOVE TASK 5.1, CREATIVE ANALYSIS AND PLAN ALTERNATIVES.
Councilmember Buckshnis expressed concern with moving away from a comprehensive plan update and
doing GIS modeling, testing land use, zoning and massing as that should occur after the comprehensive
plan has been updated. She did not think it was appropriate for scenario planning to be in a comprehensive
plan update and recommended it be removed. Mr. Levitan commented if the term scenario planning was an
issue, that section was intended to provide the goal and policy foundation for the alternatives analyzed in
the EIS. The City is required to look at a couple different alternatives or scenarios to meet its growth targets
when preparing a comprehensive EIS. This would occur after all the analysis and engagement is done and
feedback has been provided by the community regarding how to meet growth targets. It could be called
something else so it does not seem like some esoteric scenario analysis. This is the bread and butter of the
policy development, the link between policy writing, background analysis community engagement.
Councilmember Olson said that satisfied her concerns.
Councilmember Buckshnis said her concern is the EIS should be a subcomponent of the comprehensive
plan. Mr. Levitan referred to the environmentally focused analysis, explaining based on that analysis, the
evaluation of the alternatives and the preferred alternative leads to specific land uses in specific parts of the
City. The integrated EIS is not technically an element of comprehensive plan, but is required in this case
because the City has not done one in so long and enough things need to be changed. Councilmember
Buckshnis reiterated Kirkland did not do an EIS. She commented the complete EIS will be a subcomponent
of the comprehensive plan and elements of the EIS will be integrated via this scenario planning. Mr. Levitan
explained it is cyclical; as the plan alternatives are developed and policies are considered, they feed into the
environmental review that includes a preferred alternative. If the preferred alternative is to put more growth
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 25
Packet Pg. 169
7.1.a
downtown, on Highway 99 or in neighborhood commercial centers, the policy development is far enough
along that it is evaluated in the preferred alternative.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented Task 5.1 is to implement the EIS into comprehensive plan. Mr.
Levitan responded the analysis is incorporated, there will not be specific language included in the
comprehensive plan.
COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE AMENDMENT WITH THE AGREEMENT
OF THE SECOND.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
REVISE "CONDUCT TARGETED ONE-ON-ONE BRIEFINGS (UP TO 5) IN THE FOURTH
BULLET IN TASK 3.1 TO "A MINIMUM OF THREE TO FIVE." AMENDMENT CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
REVISE "UP TO (2) ONE-ON-ONE MEETINGS" IN THE FIFTH BULLET IN TASK 3.1 TO
"TWO." MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NAND, TO REVISE
THE FIRST BULLET UNDER DELIVERABLES IN TASK 5.2 TO READ, "PRESENTATION FO
TO AND VETTING OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT VISION AND ACTION STRATEGY
TO BY THE EDC AND PLANNING BOARD IN A JOINT SESSION."
Councilmember Olson explained the intent was a participatory, collaborative process and the input of the
EDC and planning board do matter.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she planned to make the same motion. She was concerned about the amount
of money and wondered whether this high level analysis needed to be performed when there is no code yet
for ADUs, cottages, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, etc. She was concerned about the cost of developing
scenarios. She supported the motion because there would be some vetting, commenting this is Edmonds,
not Seattle or some big city and this seems way over the top.
AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Olson pointed out a scrivener's error in the last item on Task 6.1, "streeting" should be
changed to "steering." She referred to the deliverables under Task 6.3 which include presentation with
vision for neighborhood commercial areas and asked who will receive that presentation and should be it be
presentation and vetting. Ms. McLaughlin answered it was a presentation to the neighborhood stakeholders
at the three neighborhood meetings. It would be a presentation of the vision as a result of the feedback.
Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out inconsistencies between Task 6.2 that refers to submitting an
Economic Development Vision and Strategies Memo; Task 6.3 refers to an Economic Development Plan
Memo. She was worried about the cost and asked if the element was being updated or was a vision and
strategy being developed. Mr. Levitan answered this task is specifically related to an economic development
plan that would be adopted by reference with items outside the typical goals and policies. This is a separate
budget item approved for community services and economic development which is why there are elements
beyond the traditional comprehensive plan element. It is basically an economic development vision that
would be used as the goal and policy framework for the comprehensive plan element.
Councilmember Buckshnis relayed she had a problem with all the deliverables. She asked why the
consultant would be asked for recommended code changes for the ECDC, envisioning code comes after the
vision is provided. She asked why the City would pay a consultant to provide code changes. Mr. Levitan
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 26
Packet Pg. 170
7.1.a
answered it is not a mandatory part of the comprehensive plan contract, but a common deliverable for a
firm that has done the goal and policy is to take the next step knowing the City will make changes to the
code as statutory required within six months of the adoption of the comprehensive plan. If the council
wanted to rely entirely on staff, that could be done, but this is a common deliverable.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed code writing is much different that visioning and writing a
comprehensive plan. She anticipated getting rid of some of the deliverables could lower the cost of the
contract. She did not think the City needed the consultant to make development code recommendations.
Ms. McLaughlin explained per GMA, the zoning code must be consistent with the comprehensive plan.
The consultant will not write the code, but will identify aspects of the existing code that will need to be
changed due to changes in the comprehensive plan. It gives the City a springboard into making those code
changes which she suspected would be significant based on the scale of the comprehensive plan update.
She highly recommended utilizing that service to ensure the City meets the GMA requirements.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the City was incorporating the new state housing bills in this
comprehensive plan update. She hoped that would be done in a future comprehensive plan update as not all
the information is known. Mr. Levitan answered the goal and policy framework will be provided to be
consistent with state law. To be consistent with the comprehensive plan, the zoning code will need to be
consistent with state law with regard to recent housing bills. It would be irresponsible not to consider those
in creating a goal and policy document and provide a foundation for those zoning changes that will need to
be implemented. The housing bills cannot be ignored knowing that within after six months after adoption,
the City's zoning will need to be changed to allow duplexes on a majority of lots and up to fourplexes on
certain lots within proximity to transit.
Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out HB 1110 takes effect in 2025. Mr. Levitan said the code has to be
updated by 2025. The City will need to work on it during the comprehensive plan update and cannot wait
until January 1, 2025. Consideration needs to be given to creating a goal and policy document that will be
consistent with state law at the time of adoption. Councilmember Buckshnis pointed out there has not been
a ruling from the Department of Commerce on the specifics. Mayor Nelson reminded councilmembers to
keep their comments relevant to the main motion.
UPON ROLL CALL, MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS
TEITZEL, CHEN, OLSON, AND PAINE AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING YES;
COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS AND NAND VOTING NO.
Mayor Nelson thanked Mr. Levitan and Ms. McLaughlin for their professionalism and expertise and said
he values everything they do for the City.
3. RESOLUTION REGARDING 2024 BUDGET PRIORITIES
Council President Tibbott suggested in light of the vast amount of input and documentation in the packet
and subsequent edits and amendments that have been sent to the council office this week, the amended
resolution be on next week's consent agenda. Any further amendments or suggestions can be incorporated
in the document. It was the consensus of the council to put the resolution on the consent agenda next week.
9. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Nelson reminded of the Edmonds Police Department Guns for Gift Cards buyback event on Saturday
from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. at the Public Works building.
10. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 27
Packet Pg. 171
Councilmember Chen promoted the Fit It Edmonds app, commenting he has tried it, it works and is very
effective. The response was quick and action was taken quickly. He encouraged the public to use it and
make Edmonds an even better place.
Councilmember Paine thanked Lynnwood Honda for the community engagement vehicle and Commander
Hawley for putting that program together. She liked the Fit It app, finding it great for data collection as well
as ensuring issues on the City's roads and parks are addressed. The Coffee with Cops event was very
successful and she was happy the message about speeding got carried forward.
Council President Tibbott commented councilmembers all learned a lot about the comprehensive plan
tonight which will make them better participants in future deliberations.
COUNCILMEMBER OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
EXTEND TO 10:22. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Olson reminded of the public hearing regarding the comprehensive plan vision statement
on August 2. The raw data used to create the draft vision statement is available on the City's website.
Councilmember Nand reported prior to tonight's meeting, the council held a special meeting to interview
candidates for the salary commission and the planning board alternate. Those appointments were approved
on tonight's consent agenda. She welcomed Kathy Erhlich, Gary Holton, Angela Zhang, Bill Taylor and
Brook Roberts to the salary commission and Emily Nutsch as the alternate on the planning board. She
thanked them for volunteering, commenting the City is greatly enriched by its volunteers.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked Todd Cloutier who is retiring after serving on the planning board for
over decade. She was invited to participate on a panel along with David Trout, Chair, Puget Sound
Partnership Salmon Recovery Council, and Laura Blackmore, Executive Director, Puget Sound
Partnership, to talk about salmon recovery issues, regional and local collaboration, and what needs to
happen to make Puget Sound a better place.
Councilmember Chen announced his appointment of Ian Egan to the tree board, commenting he was the
right person with the expertise.
11. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:21 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
July 18, 2023
Page 28
Packet Pg. 172
7.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Lori Palmer
Background/History
Approval of payroll check #65742 dated July 5, 2023 for $1,228.83, payroll checks #65743 through
#65755 dated July 20, 2023 for $10,549.83, payroll direct deposit for $810,152.42, benefit checks
#65756 through #65762 and wire payments for $769,105.76, for the pay period of July 1, 2023 through
July 15, 2023.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of payments.
Attachments:
benefit checks summary 07-15-2023
payroll earnings summary 07-15-2023
payroll earnings summary 07-05-2023 kelly day
Packet Pg. 173
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,099 - 07/01/2023 to 07/15/2023
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
65756
07/20/2023
bpas
BPAS
5,245.69
0.00
65757
07/20/2023
chap1
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
175.00
0.00
65758
07/20/2023
epoa2
EPOA-POLICE
6,279.00
0.00
65759
07/20/2023
epoa3
EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT
731.51
0.00
65760
07/20/2023
icma
MISSIONSQUARE PLAN SERVICES
5,871.63
0.00
65761
07/20/2023
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
4,280.61
0.00
65762
07/20/2023
teams
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763
5,978.00
0.00
28,561.44
0.00
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
3543
07/20/2023
awc
AWC
405,552.64
0.00
3549
07/20/2023
us
US BANK
155,495.46
0.00
3550
07/20/2023
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N317761
141,344.85
0.00
3552
07/20/2023
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
6,473.00
0.00
3553
07/20/2023
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
30,973.37
0.00
3555
07/20/2023
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
705.00
0.00
740,544.32
0.00
Grand Totals: 769,105.76
0.00
7.2.a
0
a
m
v
m
L_
Y
V
m
t
m
c
a�
0
0
L
CL
4-
0
M
0
L
Q
a
Q
M
N
0
N
LO
ti
0
c�
E
E
Y
V
d
t
V
w
d
C
N
a+
C
d
E
t
V
R
r
r
Q
7/19/2023 Packet Pg. 174
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,099 (07/01/2023 to 07/15/2023)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
120
SICK
SICK LEAVE - L & 1
72.00
3,578.85
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
297.75
14,928.02
122
VACATION
VACATION
2,212.56
118,962.26
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
211.50
10,373.34
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
50.00
2,863.25
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
319.19
17,017.56
128
HOLIDAY
Holiday Bank WWTP
148.00
7,297.64
129
SICK
Police Sick Leave L & 1
144.00
7,889.99
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kelly Day Used
168.00
8,793.41
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
166.21
9,556.81
160
VACATION
MANAGEMENT LEAVE
95.00
8,338.19
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
15,421.00
814,945.42
193
REGULAR HOURS
LIGHT DUTY
20.00
1,043.68
194
SICK
Emergency Sick Leave
64.00
1,900.75
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
146.75
8,009.19
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
48.00
3,265.75
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
15.00
1,705.44
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
449.50
34,268.47
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
9.50
938.08
400
MISCELLANEOUS
MISC PAY
0.00
1,900.00
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
0.00
2,966.38
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
1,572.98
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
-310.46
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 1.0
82.00
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5
228.75
0.00
606
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 2.0
3.50
0.00
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
175.59
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
238.28
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstruction ist
0.00
54.76
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
201.58
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
113.61
ctr
MISCELLANEOUS
CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM
0.00
320.00
deftat
MISCELLANEOUS
DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
94.36
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
138.08
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
771.32
07/19/2023 Packet Pg. 175
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,099 (07/01/2023 to 07/15/2023) },
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
837.60
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
420.60
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
10,104.58
firear
MISCELLANEOUS
FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
348.87
hol
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY
1,376.86
77,051.56
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
138.08
less
MISCELLANEOUS
LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR
0.00
98.73
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
871.73
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
1,477.09
Ig12
LONGEVITY
Longevity 9%
0.00
1,836.83
Ig13
LONGEVITY
Longevity 7%
0.00
1,349.83
Ig14
LONGEVITY
Longevity 5%
0.00
547.56
Iq2
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 4%
0.00
346.28
Iq4
LONGEVITY
Lonqevitv 1%
0.00
1,101.32
Iq5
LONGEVITY
Longevity 3%
0.00
2,522.49
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Longevity 1.5%
0.00
562.08
Iq8
LONGEVITY
Longevity 8%
0.00
337.04
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
138.08
pfml
ABSENT
Paid Family Medical Leave
4.00
0.00
pfmp
ABSENT
Paid Family Medical Unpaid/Sup
18.00
0.00
pfmv
VACATION
Paid Family Medical Vacation
10.00
521.86
phy
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
2,182.91
sdp
MISCELLANEOUS
SPECIAL DUTY PAY
0.00
388.30
sqt
MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT
0.00
219.02
slw
SICK
SICK LEAVE ADD BACK
344.61
0.00
st
REGULAR HOURS
Serqeant Pay
0.00
164.27
str
MISCELLANEOUS
STREET CRIMES
0.00
219.02
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
250.60
vap
VACATION
Vacation Premium
32.00
1,571.04
22,157.68 $1,189,519.95
Total Net Pay: $820,702.25
07/19/2023 Packet Pg. 176
Hour Type Hour Class
149 KELLY DAY
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,138 (07/05/2023 to 07/05/2023)
Description
KELLY DAYS BUY BACK
Hours
Amount
36.00 1,612.94
36.00 $1,612.94
Total Net Pay: $1,228.83
7.2.c
07/19/2023 Packet Pg. 177
7.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Approval of claim checks and wire payment.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Lori Palmer
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #258354 through #258420 dated July 20, 2023 for $389,696.22.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of payments.
Attachments:
positive pay 7-20-2023 Agenda
Packet Pg. 178
7.3.a
apPosPay Positive Pay Listing Page: 1
7/20/2023 10:17:07AM City of Edmonds
Document group: mmccreary
Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount
065052
AARD PEST CONTROL
258354
7/20/2023
571.30
000135
ABSCO ALARMS INC
258355
7/20/2023
5,671.74
075836
AKTIVOV LLC
258356
7/20/2023
7,845.50
000850
ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
258357
7/20/2023
237,689.60
073573
ANIXTER
258358
7/20/2023
468.02
069751
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
258359
7/20/2023
67.73
070305
AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER
258360
7/20/2023
903.44
001801
AUTOMATIC W ILBERT VAULT CO
258361
7/20/2023
961.00
028050
BILL PIERRE FORD INC
258362
7/20/2023
434.09
072005
BROCKMANN, KERRY
258363
7/20/2023
1,066.65
073029
CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
258364
7/20/2023
272.43
073249
CG ENGINEERING, PLLC
258365
7/20/2023
697.50
075384
CONOM LAW FIRM PLLC
258366
7/20/2023
2,406.25
064531
DINES, JEANNIE
258367
7/20/2023
2,256.00
007253
DUNN LUMBER
258368
7/20/2023
74.31
079281
DVAADVERTISING & PUBLIC REL
258369
7/20/2023
11,412.53
007625
EDMONDS ARTS FESTIVAL
258370
7/20/2023
500.00
007775
EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
258371
7/20/2023
2,420.77
076610
EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
258372
7/20/2023
47.63
008705
EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
258373
7/20/2023
122.32
068803
EJ USA INC
258374
7/20/2023
5,919.93
008812
ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
258375
7/20/2023
179.10
009350
EVERETT DAILY HERALD
258376
7/20/2023
65.36
066378
FASTENAL COMPANY
258377
7/20/2023
555.84
072493
FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS INC
258378
7/20/2023
292.83
078293
FOUR DAY FIREPLACE
258379
7/20/2023
72.80
012199
GRAINGER
258380
7/20/2023
557.35
076542
GRANICUS
258381
7/20/2023
1,566.35
074722
GUARDIAN SECURITY SYSTEMS
258382
7/20/2023
66.85
064528
HI -LINE ELECTRICAL
258383
7/20/2023
100.91
076240
HM PACIFIC NORTHWEST INC
258384
7/20/2023
869.44
067862
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
258385
7/20/2023
1,273.11
061013
HONEY BUCKET
258386
7/20/2023
4,387.52
069366
ISSAQUAH HONDA KUBOTA
258387
7/20/2023
4,224.10
066585
KINNEY, DON
258388
7/20/2023
722.68
079328
MACKAY, KELLY & GREG
258389
7/20/2023
108.00
068186
MATTHEWS, STEVE
258390
7/20/2023
274.54
020900
MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC
258391
7/20/2023
228.41
021983
MOTOR TRUCKS INT'L & IDEALEASE
258392
7/20/2023
623.00
079204
NAND, JENNA
258393
7/20/2023
9.91
067834
NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS
258394
7/20/2023
39.78
072739
O'REILLYAUTO PARTS
258397
7/20/2023
53.81
065720
OFFICE DEPOT
258395
7/20/2023
48.62
063750
ORCA PACIFIC INC
258396
7/20/2023
412.99
027060
PACIFIC TOPSOILS
258398
7/20/2023
2,775.50
069873
PAPE MACHINERY INC
258399
7/20/2023
19,387.63
072507
PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT
258400
7/20/2023
324.00
078975
PETERSON, BECKIE
258401
7/20/2023
18.34
079209
PLANIT GEO INC
258402
7/20/2023
8,058.00
068697
PUBLIC SAFETY TESTING INC
258403
7/20/2023
605.00
068657
ROBERT HALF
258404
7/20/2023
4,620.00
064769
ROMAINE ELECTRIC
258405
7/20/2023
722.48
079221
SEATOWN ELECTRIC PLUMBING
258406
7/20/2023
119.00
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 179
apPosPay Positive Pay Listing
7/20/2023 10:17:07AM City of Edmonds
Document group: mmccreary
Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount
063306
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS
258407
7/20/2023
107.13
075628
SNO CO DEPT OF EMERG MGMT
258408
7/20/2023
14,876.50
037375
SNO CO PUD NO 1
258409
7/20/2023
7,305.52
006630
SNOHOMISH COUNTY
258410
7/20/2023
1,184.00
040917
TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC
258411
7/20/2023
67.58
075025
THE BRANDING IRON LLC
258412
7/20/2023
9.95
072649
THE WIDE FORMAT COMPANY
258413
7/20/2023
116.03
038315
TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION
258414
7/20/2023
1,869.10
064423
USA BLUE BOOK
258415
7/20/2023
128.29
044960
UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR
258416
7/20/2023
345.72
077785
WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION
258417
7/20/2023
26,787.24
073552
WELCO SALES LLC
258418
7/20/2023
335.55
011900
ZIPLY FIBER
258419
7/20/2023
1,261.27
051282
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC
258420
7/20/2023
130.35
GrandTotal :
389,696.22
Total count:
67
r
Q
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 180
7.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Approval of Minor Code Amendment Package #2 (AMD2023-0005)
Staff Lead: Rose Haas
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Rose Haas
Background/History
As part of the code modernization process recognized by the City Council in October 2022, the Council
adopted Ordinance 4295 on March 7, 2023, which created the new minor code amendment review
process in Chapter 20.80 of the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC). The minor process
allows for streamlined review and cleanup of minor development code items in Titles 15 - 24 ECDC.
Council also expressed interest in making similar minor changes to Titles 1 - 10 of the Edmonds City
Code (ECC). This work is not subject to the minor code amendment process in ECDC 20.80 but can be
included with regular omnibus revision packages and is in this case.
The intent is to bring these packages to Council on a periodic basis (quarterly to start).
Staff Recommendation
Review the attached spreadsheet (Attachment 2) which lists the proposed minor code amendments in
this package. If there are questions, Council is requested to provide staff additional guidance for future
packages, or propose removal of any of the sections proposed for amendment in Attachment 1. If there
are no questions, Council is requested to adopt the attached ordinance (Attachment 1), which shows the
code amendments as stFik /underline text in Exhibit A.
Narrative
The attached Minor Code Amendment Package 2023-2 spreadsheet (Attachment 2) provides an
overview of the 256 minor amendments proposed to ECC and ECDC. The minor changes are divided into
33 categories. Categorically, there are 23 minor amendments subject to ECDC 20.80 and a further five
minor amendments to Titles 1 - 10 ECC, which are not subject to ECDC 20.80. There are four minor
amendments that occur in both Titles 1- 10 and 15 - 24. There are six columns that include the
following information:
1) Code reference - the section, chapter or location(s) proposed for change
2) Current code language proposed for change
3) Number of occurrences - the number of times the change will be made in the code
4) Proposed change - what is proposed to be done whether eliminating or updating language
5) Reason for the proposed change - outdated reference, typo
6) Notes - context about the reason for the proposed change
Examples
Below are several examples from the spreadsheet. Emphasis has been added by Planning staff for
clarification.
Packet Pg. 181
7.4
Outdated Reference: Sections that no longer apply to current code due to the passage of time, updated
protocol, or changes in technology.
ECDC 15.00.040.A Duties of officials
"Community Development Director. The community development director shall administer and
enforce the provisions of ECDC Titles 15, 16, 17, 20 and 21, except for those provisions to be
enforced by the building official."
Typo: An incorrect reference, spelling error, or other formatting typographical error.
ECDC 20.12.020.A.5 Design review by the architectural design board
"....The continuance is intended to provide the applicant with sufficient time to prepare the
material required for Phase 1 of the public hearing, including any design or redesign needed to
address the input of the public and ADB during Phase 1 of the public hearing by complying with
the prioritized checklist."
Redundant: Sections that have been recodified into other chapters.
Chapter ECDC 17.35 Keeping of domesticated animals in residential zones.
Recodified to ECC 5.05.015 by Ord. 3988
Inconsistency: Sections that are not consistent with newer adopted municipal/state ordinances.
ECDC Section 17.50.070.13 Downtown business area parking requirements.
"The downtown business area consists of all land zoned BC, BD, or CW and located in the area
east of Puget Sound, south of Edmonds Street, west of Seventh Avenue, and north of Pine
Street..."
Needs clarification: Sections that are vague or not manifestly legible.
ECDC Section 15.00.020 Application fees.
"This section shall apply to any and all fees charged by the city planning division, public works
department, building division and for park dedication, parking and variance from
undergrounding. Such fees may be established from time to time by resolution of the city
council."
Fees not listed in Chapter 15.00 since 1996 when they were removed per Ordinance 3108.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - AMD2023-0005 Ordinance
Attachment 2 - Minor Code Amendment Package 2023-2
Packet Pg. 182
7.4.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING VARIOUS MINOR UPDATES TO
THE EDMONDS CITY CODE AND THE EDMONDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE, NONE OF WHICH
CONSTITUTE SUBSTANTIVE POLICY CHANGES
WHEREAS, the city council adopted Ordinance 4295 to create a streamlined process for
updating the city code; and
WHEREAS, the streamlined process is intended for code amendments that are minor,
noncontroversial, and lacking any substantive policy changes that would require more in depth
consideration; and
WHEREAS, the amendments adopted by this ordinance have been deemed appropriate for
this new streamlined process in that no councilmember requested that any of these amendments be
removed from the streamlined process; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 2.12.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Fire service," is hereby
amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if
fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfikethr-ough).
Section 2. Section 2.25.050 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Travel authorization and
expense reimbursement policies," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted
text is shown in s4ikethr-eugk).
Section 3. Section 2.50.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Firemen's pension board
created," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 4. Section 3.13.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Purpose," is hereby
amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
1
Packet Pg. 183
7.4.a
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 5. Section 3.16.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Parks trust fund," is
hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein
as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfikethr-oug ).
Section 6. Section 3.17.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Historic preservation gift
fund," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in s4ikethr-eugk).
Section 7. Section 3.20.050 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Occupations subject to
tax - Amounts," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 8. Section 3.22.030 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Repayment directed," is
hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein
as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike).
Section 9. Section 3.26.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Declaration of intent and
purpose," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 10. Section 3.30.060 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Authorization to contract
with state," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 11. Section 3.34.060 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Special fund created
— Purposes enumerated," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
2
Packet Pg. 184
7.4.a
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline,
deleted text is shown in str-ikethr-eug ).
Section 12. Section 3.36.080 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Establishment of impact
fee accounts," is hereby deleted as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (deleted text is shown in stfikethr-oug ).
Section 13. Section 3.40.030 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Form of bonds," is
hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein
as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strilethreugh).
Section 14. Section 3.40.050 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Delinquent assessments
Acceleration of installments due," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted
text is shown in stfikedffeugh).
Section 15. Section 3.40.070 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Improvement orders —
Special funds," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 16. Section 3.40.100 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Awarding contract —
Rejection of bids — Failure of successful bidder to perform," is hereby amended to read as shown
in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in str-ikethr-eug ).
Section 17. Section 3.40.110 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Letting contract —
Restrictions — Estimated costs — Payment of warrants," is hereby deleted as shown in Exhibit A,
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (deleted text is shown in
Section 18. Section 3.40.120 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Fixed estimate costs -
Procedure," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
3
Packet Pg. 185
7.4.a
Section 19. Section 3.40.140 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Reductions in area of
assessments" is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 20. Section 3.50.020 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Insufficient funds and
other returned checks," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st+ikethfaiigh).
Section 21. Section 3.60.140 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Appeals," is hereby
amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if
fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike gh).
Section 22. Section 3.75.080 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Delinquent payments,"
is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein
as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in s*r-ikethr-o gh)
Section 23. Section 3.75.100 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Disputes," is hereby
amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if
fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfikethr-ough).
Section 24. Section 3.75.110 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Expenditures," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 25. Section 3.75.120 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Members advisory board," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in stfilethfough).
Section 26. Section 3.75.130 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Business
improvement district fund oversight and programmatic support," is hereby amended to read as
shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
El
Packet Pg. 186
7.4.a
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in stfikethf,.,,g ).
Section 27. Section 3.8.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Marsh restoration and
preservation fund," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in stfiketh f .,,g ).
Section 28. Section 4.68.100 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Construction in right-
of-way," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 29. Section 4.68.400 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "CFAR application
requisites," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 30. Section 4.98.030 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Grounds for denial of
application - Limited," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in soil eugh).
Section 31. Section 4.100.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Purpose," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 32. Section 5.05.121 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Potentially dangerous dogs," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in stfilethfough).
Section 33. Section 5.05.127.1 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Spay or neuter of
owner -surrendered and stray animals required," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A,
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in stfileth-r-ough).
5
Packet Pg. 187
7.4.a
Section 34. Section 5.05.127.2 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Animal benefit
appropriation," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fiketh f .,,g ).
Section 35. Section 5.05.127.3 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Definitions and
integration of initiative provisions," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in st-Fikethr-oug ).
Section 36. Section 5.30.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Declaration of
policy," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fi ,eth f,.,,g ).
Section 37. Section 5.30.140 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Citizen complaints,"
is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 38. Section 5.48.030 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Authority to accept bail," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text
is shown in st-r-ikethfough).
Section 39. Chapter 6.10 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Health officer - duties," is hereby deleted as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (deleted text is shown in stfikethr-eiigh).
Section 40. Section 6.20.020 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Definitions," is
hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 41. Section 6.20.042 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Health and safety
nuisances," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
0
Packet Pg. 188
7.4.a
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fikedff .tig ).
Section 42. Section 6.20.050 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Enforcement and
abatement," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fiketh f .,,g ).
Section 43. Section 6.20.060 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Separate abatement
proceedings for junk vehicles," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in st-Fikeffifough)
Section 44. Section 6.40.200 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Enforcement officers and procedures," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A,
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in stfi eflffoug ).
Section 45. Section 6.60.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Purposes," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fikethfettgh).
Section 46. Section 7.10.025 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Delinquency charge"
is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 47. Section 7.10.060 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Limitation on water
use," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in soil eugk).
Section 48. Section 7.10.061 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Water restrictions —
Powers of the city," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
7
Packet Pg. 189
7.4.a
shown in stfikedffeug ).
Section 49. Section 7.10.062 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Water restrictions -
Surcharge," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fikethf,.,,g ).
Section 50. Section 7.10.063 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Enforcement," is
hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 51. Section 7.10.065 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Suspension of service — Failure to comply with sewer connection notice," is hereby amended
to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set
forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfi edffetig ).
Section 52. Section 7.20.050 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Adoption of state regulations," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in strip).
Section 53. Section 7.30.070 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Water, sewer and
stormwater rate reductions for low income citizens," is hereby amended to read as shown in
Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stT-ikedffetigh).
Section 54. Section 7.60.030 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Utility assistance
fund," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in stfilethfough).
Section 55. Section 7.80.030 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Services to be
provided," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in stfilethfeiigh).
Packet Pg. 190
7.4.a
Section 56. Section 7.80.050 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Reporting of
proposed rates," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in sttilethrough).
Section 57. Section 7.200.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Purpose and intent,"
is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 58. Section 8.08.060 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Ground for denial -
Limited," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in stfileugk).
Section 59. Section 8.48.610 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Contract for towing
and storage," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fikethf,.,,g ).
Section 60. Section 8.48.611 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Contract for towing
and storage — Financial responsibility," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in str-ikethr-eug ).
Section 61. Section 9.20.030 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Notice of work to be
done — Assessment procedures," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in stri et .,,, gh)
Section 62. Section 9.20.090 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Enforcement
responsibility," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st--iket ,.,.,,g ).
Section 63. Chapter 10.15 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Building board of
0
Packet Pg. 191
7.4.a
appeals," is hereby deleted as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (deleted text is shown in stfi edffeug ).
Section 64. Section 10.16.060 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Funds for
improvement and maintenance of the cemetery," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit
A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in st-i' edffeug ).
Section 65. Section 10.20.040 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Powers and duties,"
is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 66. Section 10.60.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Created," is hereby
amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if
fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-Fikethr-oug ).
Section 67. Section 10.60.020 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Meeting," is hereby
amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if
fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stFi ethr-eug ).
Section 68. Section 10.60.030 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Formal commission
structure," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in strip).
Section 69. Section 10.90.020 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Composition of the
commission," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in strip).
Section 70. Section 10.95.010 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Board created -
Membership," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in strip).
Section 71. Section 10.95.030 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Powers and duties,"
10
Packet Pg. 192
7.4.a
is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
Section 72. Chapter 15.00 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Preface and fees," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in strilethfough).
Section 73. Section 16.43.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Uses," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in �ethr .,,g ).
Section 74. Section 16.45.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Uses," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in tkethr,.,,g ).
Section 75. Section 16.50.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Uses," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in strip).
Section 76. Section 16.55.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Uses," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fi ethr-,.,,g ).
Section 77. Section 16.60.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Uses," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-,-iket .,.,.,,g ).
Section 78. Section 16.62.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Uses," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
11
Packet Pg. 193
7.4.a
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fikedff .tig ).
Section 79. Section 16.100.030 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Uses," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fiketh f .,,g ).
Section 80. Section 16.110.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Uses," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fi ,eth f,.,,g ).
Section 81. Section 17.05.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Reasonable accommodations," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in st-Fiket rough)
Section 82. Section 17.05.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Accommodations personal to the applicant," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit
A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in s#ikedffetigh).
Section 83. Section 17.05.050 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Appeal," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fikethfough).
Section 84. Section 17.10.000 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Bond required," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in st}ikethfough).
Section 85. Chapter 17.30 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Fences," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
12
Packet Pg. 194
7.4.a
in stfiketh f .,,g ).
Section 86. Chapter 17.35 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Animals," is hereby deleted as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein as if fully set forth (deleted text is shown in striker foci h)
Section 87. Section 17.50.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Parking space requirements," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in stfikethFOUgh).
Section 88. Section 17.50.030 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Calculations," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in tkethr,,,,g ).
Section 89. Section 17.50.070 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Downtown business area parking requirements," is hereby amended to read as shown in
Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-Fikethr-oug ).
Section 90. Section 17.50.090 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Temporary parking lots," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text
is shown in strip).
Section 91. Section 17.70.000 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Security units," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in s*r-iket' fough).
Section 92. Section 17.115.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Definitions," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text
is shown in stfikethfough)
Section 93. Section 18.00.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
13
Packet Pg. 195
7.4.a
"Application," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st+ike ).
Section 94. Section 18.05.000 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Scope," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in strip).
Section 95. Section 18.05.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Variances," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in �ethr .,,g ).
Section 96. Section 18.10.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Sewer connections," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text
is shown in �ket roug ).
Section 97. Section 18.20.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Permits," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fikethfough).
Section 98. Section 18.30.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Definitions," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in st-Fi ethr-,.,,g ).
Section 99. Section 18.30.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled
"Authority and regulation," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text
is shown in st-Fikethr-oug ).
Section 100. Section 18.30.050 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Administration," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
14
Packet Pg. 196
7.4.a
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text
is shown in str-ikedffoug ).
Section 101. Section 18.30.090 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Post construction inspection and maintenance roles and responsibilities," is hereby
amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if
fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in str-ikethr-oug ).
Section 102. Section 18.60.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Fees," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in str-i ,ethf:otig,).
Section 103. Section 18.70.030 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Review," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in stfikethfottgh)
Section 104. Section 18.80.060 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Driveway and curb cut requirements," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit
A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in s#ikedffetigh).
Section 105. Section 19.00.025 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "International Building Code section amendments," is hereby amended to read as
shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new
text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in sal etrgh).
Section 106. Section 19.07.110 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Variance," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in st}ikethfough).
Section 107. Section 20.05.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "General requirements," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
15
Packet Pg. 197
7.4.a
deleted text is shown in stfikethr-oug ).
Section 108. Section 20.12.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Design review by the architectural design board," is hereby amended to read as shown
in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-Fikethr-oug ).
Section 109. Section 20.15A.220 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "SEPA decisions — Substantive authority," is hereby amended to read as shown in
Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-Fi ethi:e, igh)
Section 110. Section 20.15A.290 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Fees," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown
in stfi ,eth f,.,,g ).
Section 111. Section 20.16.080 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Decision criteria — EPFs proposed by a regional agency with jurisdiction," is hereby
amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if
fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfikethr-ough).
Section 112. Section 20.18.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Purpose," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in strip).
Section 113. Section 20.30.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Review," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in strip).
Section 114. Section 20.30.050 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Loss of join use," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text
is shown in strip).
16
Packet Pg. 198
7.4.a
Section 115. Section 20.50.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Purpose," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in str-ileth-rough).
Section 116. Section 20.60.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "General regulations for permanent signs," is hereby amended to read as shown in
Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in str4' ethf^ugh)
Section 117. Section 20.60.100 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Administration," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text
is shown in str-iketht!otigh)
Section 118. Section 20.75.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Application," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text
is shown in strip).
Section 119. Section 20.75.050 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Lot line adjustment — Application," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A,
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in stfikethfoug ).
Section 120. Section 20.75.065 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Preliminary review," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in st-Fikethr-oug ).
Section 121. Section 20.75.085 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Review criteria," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (deleted text is shown in stfi ethr-oug ).
Section 122. Section 20.75.090 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Park land dedication," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
17
Packet Pg. 199
7.4.a
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in str-ikethr-oug ).
Section 123. Section 20.75.110 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Changes," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is
shown in str-ikethfoug ).
Section 124. Section 20.75.130 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Installation of improvements," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A,
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in stfi egffettg ).
Section 125. Section 20.75.140 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Final plat — Required certificates," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A,
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in stT-ike4,,.,,, gh)
Section 126. Section 20.75.145 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Final plat — Accompanying material," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit
A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in s#ikedffetigh).
Section 127. Section 20.85.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "General requirements," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in stfikeffifetigh).
Section 128. Section 20.110.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Enforcement procedures," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in strip).
Section 129. Section 21.80.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Permit coordinator," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
18
Packet Pg. 200
7.4.a
deleted text is shown in stfikethr-oug ).
Section 130. Section 22.110.000 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Purpose and intent," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in st-Fikethr-oug ).
Section 131. Section 22.110.030 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Green building construction and housing," is hereby amended to read as shown in
Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-Fi ethi:e, igh)
Section 132. Section 22.110.070 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Amenity space, open space, and green factor standards," is hereby amended to read as
shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new
text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfi edffetig ).
Section 133. Section 22.110.080 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Public space standards," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in strip).
Section 134. Section 23.40.005 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Definitions pertaining to critical areas," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit
A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in stfikedffetigh).
Section 135. Section 23.40.020 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Relationship to other regulations," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A,
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in stfikedffetigh).
Section 136. Section 23.40.090 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Critical areas report - Requirements," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit
A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in stfikedffeiigh).
19
Packet Pg. 201
7.4.a
Section 137. Section 23.40.220 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Allowed activities," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in st+ikethmugh).
Section 138. Section 23.40.240 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Unauthorized critical area alterations and enforcement," is hereby amended to read as
shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new
text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in stfike4ffeiigh).
Section 139. Section 23.50.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Development standards - Wetlands," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit
A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in
underline; deleted text is shown in s#ike4ffeugh).
Section 140. Section 23.80.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Designation, rating and mapping — Geologically hazardous areas," is hereby amended
to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set
forth (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in str-ike4ffeug ).
Section 141. Section 23.80.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Allowed activities — Geologically hazardous areas," is hereby amended to read as
shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new
text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in str-ike4ffeug ).
Section 142. Section 23.80.070 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Development standards — Specific hazards," is hereby amended to read as shown in
Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-Fikethr-oug ).
Section 143. Section 23.90.040 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Development standards — Specific habitats," is hereby amended to read as shown in
Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in st-Fikethr-oug ).
Section 144. Section 24.30.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
20
Packet Pg. 202
7.4.a
entitled "Adoption criteria," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A, which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is shown in underline;
deleted text is shown in st+ikethfetigh).
Section 145. Section 24.80.150 of the Edmonds Community Development Code,
entitled "Administrative authority and responsibility," is hereby amended to read as shown in
Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth (new text is
shown in underline; deleted text is shown in St+i ,ethFOt1g,,).
Section 146. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 147. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an administrative function of the city
council, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and
publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
21
Packet Pg. 203
7.4.a
APPROVED:
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
BY_ JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
22
Packet Pg. 204
7.4.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2023, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING VARIOUS MINOR
UPDATES TO THE EDMONDS CITY CODE AND THE
EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE,
NONE OF WHICH CONSTITUTE SUBSTANTIVE
POLICY CHANGES
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of 92023.
4840-7251-8158, v. 1
23
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 205
7.4.a
AMD2023-0005 Minor Code Amendment Package 2
Section 2.12.010 Fire service.
Fire service is provided to the even residents of the city of Edmonds by and through a contract with South County
Fire. Whenever any reference is made in the provisions of the Edmonds City Code or Edmonds Community
Development Code to "fire chief," "fire marshal," "fire department" or any other reference to a fire fighter or fire
services, such term shall include, for the provision of administrative or other day to day fire services, to reference
the fire chief, fire marshal and fire fighting services performed for the city by contract by South County Fire.
A. The officials of South County Fire when performing services by contract to the eitizen residents of the city of
Edmonds and to the city in its corporate capacity shall exercise any and all rights, duties, obligations and
responsibilities in accordance with the provisions of this code to the same extent and in the same manner as if
performed by an employee of the city.
B. Employees of South County Fire shall not be entitled to any wage or benefit provision of this code, including but
not limited to Chapters 2.06 and 2.35 ECC. The Edmonds civil service system shall remain in effect but no
employee of South County Fire shall have recourse to the civil service commission following the termination date of
fire department employees by the city. [Ord. 4299 § 2 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 3762 § 2, 2009].
Section 2.25.050 Travel authorization and expense reimbursement policies.
A. Policy. It is the city's policy to provide payment for the reasonable accommodation of travel required to conduct
city business by city officials and employees.
B. Applicability. This section and the policies contained herein shall be applicable to all elected officials, members
of boards and commissions and city employees unless otherwise specifically exempted.
C. Authorization for Travel. All requests for travel or training shall be submitted and approved on an authorization
to travel and attend training form prior to the person's departure date.
1. All anticipated costs should be listed on the form, whether the costs are known or reasonably estimated.
2. The mayor is authorized to approve all employee's requests which are included within the city's annual
budget.
D. Travel and Training Request — City Council Approval. City council president approval must be obtained of all
travel and training requests for members of the city council and members of city boards and commissions.
E. Accommodations. Accommodations, such as transportation, lodging and conference registration shall normally
be arranged in advance by designated staff member and billed directly to the city. Accommodations shall be made at
the lowest reasonable rate available, such as coach fare for air transportation, use of special discounts and single
occupancy government rates for lodging. Air travel should be used when other reasonable methods of transport are
not otherwise available and time schedules require the additional expense.
F. Advance Payment of Expenses. Pursuant to ECC 2.25.070, advance payment of authorized expenses in excess of
$100.00, as listed on the authorization to attend/travel form, will be provided upon request. Request for an advance
payment must be made at least one week prior to the departure date.
G. Reimbursement of Travel Expenses.
1. Travel expenses by city officials and employees shall be paid by the city in accordance with the rate schedule
listed below. Expense vouchers must be submitted for payment within 10 days following the individual's
return. Expense receipts and/or credit card receipts must be submitted for city payment. If a receipt has been
lost or stolen, the employee should submit a written statement to the r...a*ee dir-eeta f administrative services
director explaining the circumstances of the missing receipt. Reimbursements based on this process may be
Packet Pg. 206
7.4.a
issued. Reimbursement for any expenses which exceed the limits set forth in this policy shall require approval
of the city council.
Transportation:
Air travel — Coach rate
Private car — Current IRS rate
Rental car — Requires prior approval
Lodging:
Regular lodging — Government/commercial rate
Conferences — Conference facility rate
Meals:
Per diem rate in conformance with the State of Washington Office of Financial Management guidelines in effect at
the time of travel
Communications:
Telephone — One personal call per day kept to a reasonable amount
2. The transportation allowance shall be based upon the direct route round trip costs. Other allowable costs
shall include ferry tolls and off-street parking. Taxis may be used if they are the most reasonable means of
transportation available.
H. Nonallowable Expenses. Expenses not approved for reimbursement include, but are not limited to, alcoholic
beverages, expenses for family or guests, entertainment, travel costs paid by another organization, mileage (if
traveling as a passenger in a nonowned car), limousine services and personal travel insurance. Only the normal,
reasonable and actual expenses will be reimbursed. Public officials and employees utilize public funds for their
expenses and are admonished and requested to limit expenditures to those reasonably necessary to provide safe,
clean and convenient lodging and healthy meals in settings appropriate to the public mission with which they have
been entrusted.
I. Use of Private Cars. Private cars should be used by city officials and employees whenever a city vehicle is not
available and/or the time the official or employee will be absent exceeds two or more days. Drivers must have a
valid operator's license, and the car must be insured to the state's minimum liability standards. The mayor, members
of the city council, boards and commissions shall not be reimbursed for mileage expenses incurred within the city
limits of Edmonds. City employees will be reimbursed for mileage when using a private vehicle within the city
limits when such use is in furtherance of city business. The city's mileage reimbursement rate is intended to cover
the cost of fuel, maintenance and insurance costs. Persons using a private vehicle and seeking reimbursement for
mileage must maintain a valid driver's license and individual auto insurance, including public liability, bodily injury
and property damage, which insurance shall be deemed to be primary as to any other insurance available to the city.
If a private vehicle is used in lieu of air transportation, the total amount of reimbursement shall not exceed the cost
of air fare as established in subsection (G) of this section. [Ord. 3917 § 1, 2013; Ord. 3512 § 1, 2004; Ord. 3214 § 1,
1998; Ord. 2953 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2893 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2873 § 1, 1992].
Section 2.50.010 Firemen's pension board created.
A. There is hereby created the Edmonds firemen's pension board to consist of the following five members:
1. The mayor, who shall be chairman of the board;
Packet Pg. 207
7.4.a
2. The city clerk;
3. The f;.,anoe dir-eetaF administrative services director; and
4. Two regularly employed firemen elected by secret ballot of the firemen.
B. The first members to be elected by the firemen shall serve for a term of one and two years, respectively, and their
successors shall be elected annually for a two-year term. The two firemen so elected shall, in turn, select a third
fireman who shall serve as an alternate in the event of absence of one of the regularly selected firemen. [Ord. 1133 §
1, 1965].
Section 3.13.010 Purpose.
The city of Edmonds accepts the responsibility for expanding public experience throughout the broad spectrum of
the arts by providing local and cultural artistic services and programs to its eitizen residents. Artists capable of
creating for the public in the fields of visual, written and performing arts should be encouraged, and such is hereby
declared to be the policy of the city of Edmonds. In harmony with this policy it should be the policy of the city to
require that visual art be included in any city public works project, where applicable, and that a portion of the cost of
such project, where applicable, be allocated for the acquisition of visual art. It shall also be the policy of the city to
provide an annual allocation from the city's general revenues to the municipal arts fund as created by Ordinance
1765 of the city for the purposes enumerated in said ordinance. [Ord. 2667 § 1, 1988; Ord. 1802 § 1, 1975].
Section 3.16.010 Parks trust fund.
The administrative services director is hereby authorized to create and number a new fund to be known as the parks
trust fund for the purpose of receiving donations from the city's eitizen residents for, or in aid of, the cost of
operating, maintaining and improving the city's parks and other related beautification, aquatic, and environmental
protection programs such as the city's flower program, the Beach Ranger program and the Yost Pool. This fund is
created and shall be maintained to the end that such donations shall be fully tax deductible and in accordance with
the laws of the United States and the regulations of the Internal Revenue Service. [Ord. 3466 § 1, 2003].
Section 3.17.010 Historic preservation gift fund.
The finance director administrative services director is hereby authorized to create and number a new fund to be
known as the "historic preservation gift fund" for the purpose of receiving donations from the city's citizen residents
or from any interested party for, or in aid of, the cost of promoting or supporting the city's historic preservation
programs and the activities of its historic preservation commission. This fund is created and shall be maintained with
the intent that such donations shall be potentially tax deductible and in accordance with the laws of the United States
and the regulations of the Internal Revenue Service. [Ord. 3896 § 1, 2012].
3.20.050 Occupations subject to tax — Amounts.
Sellers of electricity, gas, water, sewer, cable television and telephone services shall be subject to the taxes imposed
by this chapter. There are levied upon, and shall be collected from, every person, firm, corporation or other entity on
account of the business activities, license and occupation taxes in the amounts to be determined by the application of
the rates against gross income as follows:
A. Public Utility Districts. Upon every person, firm, corporation or other entity engaged in or carrying on the
business of selling or furnishing electrical energy and power a tax equal to six percent is levied upon the total gross
income from the sale of electricity within the corporate limits of the city during and for the term for which the
Packet Pg. 208
7.4.a
occupation license is required; provided, however, that there shall be no tax or fee upon revenues derived from the
sale of electricity for the purposes of resale.
B. Natural or Manufactured Gas and Service. Upon every person, firm, corporation or other entity engaged in or
carrying on the business of transmitting, distributing, selling and furnishing natural and/or manufactured gas, a tax
equal to six percent of the total gross income from the sale of gas within the corporate limits of the city during and
for the term for which the occupation license is required.
C. Brokered Natural Gas — Use Tax in Lieu of Occupations Tax. There is imposed under the authority of RCW
35.21.870 a use tax on the consumers of brokered natural gas. Such tax shall be in lieu of the tax imposed by
subsection (B) of this section when consumers receive natural gas directly from a producer of manufactured natural
gas outside of the state of Washington. Such tax shall be the same as that imposed on a natural manufactured gas
utility by subsection (B) of this section, equal to six percent of the customer's monthly purchases or other use charge
by the broker of out-of-state natural gas.
D. Telephone Business. A tax equal to six percent of the gross subscribers' exchange monthly service charges billed
to business and residence customers located within the corporate limits of the city, together with six percent of gross
income derived from intrastate toll service provided to business and residential customers located within the
corporate limits of the city.
E. Cable Television. Pursuant to Chapter 4.68 ECC, community antenna television systems, commonly known as
cable television franchisees, are hereby levied a franchise fee of five percent, as authorized by 47 U.S.C. Section
542(a) and RCW 35.21.860, on all gross revenues derived from any source of revenue by cable television
franchisees from their cable television operations in the city of Edmonds. In addition thereto, a business license tax,
as authorized in part by 47 U.S.C. Section 542(g)(2)(A), is hereby levied equal to six percent on all gross revenues
derived from any source of revenue by cable television franchisees from their cable television operations in the city
of Edmonds.
F. City Sewer Utility. The city of Edmonds, as a seller of sewer services, shall be subject to the tax imposed by this
chapter. The sewer utility shall pay a license fee or tax equal to 10 percent of the gross income from the city's sewer
utility.
G. Solid Waste Haulers. Any solid waste hauler shall be subject to the tax imposed by this chapter. The solid waste
hauler shall pay a tax equal to six percent of the total gross income from the charges derived from solid waste
disposal services within the corporate limits of the city during and for the term for which the occupation license is
required.
H. City Water Utility. The city of Edmonds, as the seller of water services, shall be subject to the tax imposed by
this chapter. The water utility shall pay a license tax or fee equal to the percentage shown in the table below for the
given year on the gross income from the city's water utility:
Packet Pg. 209
7.4.a
Water Utility Tax Rate
Year
Tax Rate
(Current) 2016
18.70%
2017
17.07%
2018
15.50%
2019
14.05%
2020
12.68%
2021
10%
I. City comer Stormwater Utility. The city of Edmonds, as the seller of e stormwater services, shall
be subject to the tax imposed by this chapter. The stormwater utility shall pay a license tax or fee equal
to 10 percent on the gross income from the city's stormwater utility. [Ord. 4051 § 1, 2016; Ord. 3953 §
1, 2013; Ord. 3745 § 1, 2009; Ord. 3709 § 1, 2008; Ord. 3688 § 1, 2008; Ord. 3618 § 1, 2006; Ord. 3531 § 1, 2005;
Ord. 3432 § 2, 2002; Ord. 3281 § 1, 1999; Ord. 2899 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2837 § 3, 1991; Ord. 2775-A § 1, 1990; Ord.
2413, 1983; Ord. 2339 § 1, 1982].
Section 3.22.030 Repayment directed.
The administrative services director is directed and authorized to repay such loans, in whole or in part, when
budgeted general fund revenues are received sufficient to cover the projected foreseeable needs of the city for the
ensuing month of the budget year. In the event of doubt regarding the foreseeable needs of the city, the €xiaaee
dir-eete administrative services director is encouraged to consult with the mayor and council president and to bring
questions regarding borrowing or repayment to the city council for its advice. [Ord. 3431 § 1, 2002].
Section 3.26.010 Declaration of intent and purpose.
The city of Edmonds finds that mass public transportation is essential and necessary for the proper protection of the
health, welfare and safety of the eiti.-en residents of Edmonds. In order to provide the necessary services, the city
has contracted with the municipality of metropolitan Seattle to provide the necessary services for the eitizen
residents of Edmonds. The city council of the city of Edmonds specifically finds that the levying and collection of
excise taxes authorized by RCW 35.58.273 is essential to provide adequate mass transportation services. [Ord. 1832
§ 2, 1976].
Section 3.30.060 Authorization to contract with state.
The finanee director administrative services director is authorized to execute a contract with the Department of
Revenue of the state of Washington for the administration and collection of the tax imposed by this chapter;
provided, however, that the city attorney shall first approve the form and content of said contract. [Ord. 1833 § 7,
1976].
Packet Pg. 210
7.4.a
Section 3.34.060 Special fund created — Purposes enumerated.
There is hereby created a special fund to be known as the "tourism promotion fund." All taxes levied hereunder shall
be placed in said fund for the purpose of paying all or any part of the cost of tourism, promotion, acquisition of
tourism -related facilities, or the operation of tourism -related facilities in accordance with the definitions of the terms
tourism, tourism promotion, and tourism -related facility as such terms are defined in RCW 67.28.080. The monies
accumulated in said fund may be invested in interest -bearing securities by the city fina ee dir-eeta f administrative
services director in any manner authorized by law. The city council may agree to the utilization of revenue from
taxes imposed under this chapter for the purposes of funding a multi jurisdictional tourism -related facility. [Ord.
3166 § 1, 1997; Ord. 2539, 1985; Ord. 2010 § 1, 1978].
Section 3.36.080 Establishment of impact fee accounts.
A. Impact fee receipts shall be earmarked specifically and deposited in special interest -bearing accounts.
B. There is hereby established a separate impact fee account for the park impact fees collected pursuant to this
chapter, the park impact account. There is also hereby established a separate impact fee account for the street impact
fees collected pursuant to this chapter, the street impact account. Funds withdrawn from these accounts must be used
in accordance with the provisions of ECC 3.36.100 and applicable state law. Interest earned on the fees shall be
retained in the respective accounts and expended for the purposes for which the impact fees were collected.
C. On an annual basis, the Tina e dir-eeter administrative services director shall provide a report to the council on
the impact fee accounts showing the source and amount of all monies collected, earned, or received, and the public
improvements that were financed in whole or in part by impact fees.
D. Impact fees shall be expended or encumbered within 10 years of receipt, unless the council identifies in written
findings extraordinary and compelling reason or reasons for the city to hold the fees beyond the 10-year period.
Under such circumstances, and prior to the expiration of the 10-year period, the council shall establish the period of
time within which the impact fees shall be expended or encumbered. [Ord. 4048 § 1, 2016; Ord. 4037 § 1 (Att. A),
2016; Ord. 3934 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013].
Section 3.40.030 Form of bonds.
All bonds issued in the pursuance of the provisions of this chapter and the Laws of the State of Washington shall be
in substantially the following form:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
NO.
CITY OF EDMONDS
Local Improvement Bond
L.I.D. No.
N.B. — This bond is issued by virtue of the provisions of RCW 35.54.010 to 35.54.090;
RCW 35.43.040, 35.43.130, et seq.; RCW 35.45.030; and RCW 35.45.070 which reads
as follows:
"Neither the holder nor owner of any bond, interest coupon, or warrant issued against a
local improvement fund shall have any claim therefor against the city or town by which it
is issued, except for payment from the special assessments made for the improvement for
which the bond or warrant was issued and except also for payment from the local
Packet Pg. 211
7.4.a
improvement guarantee fund of the city or town as to bonds issued after the creation of a
local improvement guarantee fund of that city or town. The city or town shall not be
liable to the holder or owner of any bond, interest coupon or warrant for any loss to the
local improvement guarantee fund occurring in the lawful operation thereof.
The bondholder's remedy in case of nonpayment shall be confined to the enforcement of
the special assessments made for the improvement and to the guarantee fund. THE CITY
OF EDMONDS, a municipal corporation of the state of Washington, hereby promises to
pay to or bearer, Dollars lawful money of the United States,
with interest thereon, at the rate of () percent, per annum, payable
annually, out of the fund established by Ordinance No. of said city, known as
Local Improvement Fund District No. of the city of Edmonds, and not otherwise,
both principal and interest payable at the office of the finance di feeter- administrative
services director of said city.
A coupon is hereto attached for each installment of interest to accrue hereon, and said
interest shall be paid only on presentation and surrender of such coupons to the €mane
deter administrative services director, but in case this bond is called for payment
before maturity, each and every coupon representing interest not accrued at the time this
bond is payable under such call shall be void. This bond is payable on or before the
day of , 19_, and is subject to call by the fina ee dir-eeter- administrative services
director of said city, whenever there shall be sufficient money in said Local Improvement
Fund to pay the same and all unpaid bonds of the series of which this bond is one which
are prior to this bond in numerical order over and above sufficient for the payment of
interest on all unpaid bonds of said series. The city council of said city, as the agent of
said Local Improvement District No. , established by Ordinance No. , has
caused this bond to be issued in the name of said city as the bond of said District, the
bond or the proceeds thereof to be applied in part payment of so much of the cost and
expense of the improvement of and such other work as may be necessary to
make a complete improvement under said Ordinance No. as is levied and assessed
against the property included in said Local Improvement District No. , and
benefited by said improvement, and the said Local Improvement Fund District No.
of the city of Edmonds, has been established by ordinance for the said purpose; and the
holder or holders of this bond shall look only to said fund or to the Local Improvement
Guarantee Fund for the payment of both the principal and interest upon this bond.
The call for payment of this bond or any bond of the series of which this is one, shall be
made by the fina- ee dire ter- administrative services director by publishing the same in
the city official newspaper of said city, and when such call is made for the payment of
this bond, it will be paid on the day the next interest coupon thereon shall become due,
after said call, and upon said day, interest upon this bond shall cease.
This bond is one of a series of bonds aggregating in all the principal sum of
$ , issued for said Local Improvement District No. , all of which bonds are
subject to the same terms and conditions as herein expressed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the city of Edmonds has caused these presents to be signed
by its mayor and attested by its clerk, and sealed with its corporate seal this day of
,19
The City of Edmonds,
II,
Mayor
Packet Pg. 212
7.4.a
Attest:
City Clerk
No.
There shall be attached to each bond such number of coupons, not exceeding 12, as shall
be required to represent the interest thereon, payable annually for the term of said bonds,
which coupons shall be in substantially the following form:
On the day of , 19_
CITY OF EDMONDS, STATE OF WASHINGTON
Promises to pay to the bearer at the office of its r.... nee dir-eete-r- administrative services
director
Dollars
being one year's interest due that day on Bond No. of the Bonds of Local
Improvement District No. of the city of Edmonds, and not otherwise provided that
this coupon is subject to all the terms and conditions contained in the bond to which it is
annexed, and if said bond be called for payment before maturity hereof this coupon shall
be void.
The City of Edmonds,
By
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
[Ord. 651 § 3, 1954].
Section 3.40.050 Delinquent assessments — Acceleration of installments due.
When any assessment has become delinquent it shall be the duty of the ranee dir-eete f administrative services
director to make and file with the city clerk a statement of all such delinquencies. If on the first day of January in
any year, two installments of any local improvement assessment are delinquent, then all installments shall at that
time become due and payable and the collection thereof enforced by foreclosure. [Ord. 1350 § 1, 1968; Ord. 651 § 5,
1954].
Section 3.40.070 Improvement orders — Special funds.
Every ordinance ordering any improvement shall fix the boundaries of the district which will be assessed to pay the
cost and expense thereof, and shall also create a special fund to be known as "Local Improvement Fund District No.
" into which shall be placed all sums paid on account of such assessment, including interest and penalty thereon,
and in the event of sale of such bonds by the city, all premiums and accrued interest on the bonds issued for such
improvement. It shall be the duty of the Tina -nee dire to f administrative services director to call and pay in numerical
Packet Pg. 213
7.4.a
order such outstanding bonds against any particular improvement fund as he may be able to pay with money on hand
credited to such fund. [Ord. 651 § 7, 1954].
Section 3.40.100 Awarding contract — Rejection of bids — Failure of successful bidder to perform.
A. At the time and place named in such notice to bidders, such bids shall be publicly opened and read; no bid shall
be rejected for informality, but it shall be received as a bid if it can be understood what is meant thereby. The
council shall proceed to determine the lowest bidder and may let such contract to such bidder. The city council shall
have power by resolution to reject any and all bids and to make further calls for bids in the same manner as the
original call, or if in its judgment the improvement or work can be done by the city at less cost than the lowest bid
submitted, it may do so without making a further call for bids or awarding any contract therefor, and in such cases
all checks shall be returned to the bidders by the city clerk; but if the contract be let, then, in such case, all checks
shall be returned to the bidders, except that of the successful bidder, which shall be retained until the contract be
entered into for making such improvement between the bidder and the city in accordance with such bid, and the duly
approved and accepted bond therefor be filed in the office of the city clerk.
B. If said bidder fails to enter into such contract in accordance with his bid within 10 days from the date at which he
is notified that he is the successful bidder, the city clerk shall write or print across the face of the certified check:
"Forfeited to the city of Edmonds, city clerk," and shall deliver said check to the finan .e a".eet administrative
services director to be deposited to the credit of the local improvement fund for which the same was given, and the
council shall readvertise for the bids for such work. Neither the city council nor any officer of the city shall have the
power to remit such forfeiture. [Ord. 651 § 10, 1954].
Section 3.40.110 Letting contract — Restrictions — Estimated costs — Payment of warrants.
A. In letting all contracts for public improvements under this chapter, the council shall comply with Chapters 39.04
and 39.08 RCW and the same are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this section by reference.
The council shall further limit the time within which said work shall be completed, and during the time allowed in
the contract for the completion of the work, the city engineer shall, on the last day of each month, issue an estimate
of the amount of work done by the contractor during the month; but shall, after the date for completion of the
contract, furnish no estimate other than the final estimate issued after the completion of the work. Said final estimate
issued by the city engineer shall include, in addition to a statement of the amount of money expended for fixed
estimate costs prior to the date set for the completion of the contract. All fixed estimate costs incurred by the city
after the time fixed in the contract for its completion shall be borne by the contractor as a penalty for failure to
complete the work within the specified time.
B. All estimates of the city engineer shall be filed in the office of the city clerk and by him reported to the council at
the next regular meeting, or at a special meeting called for that purpose, and not more than 95 percent of such
estimate shall be allowed and all warrants ordered in payment thereof shall be drawn only upon the particular local
improvement fund under which the work is done, and which warrants shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed eight
percent per annum from date until redeemed either in money or bonds by the finance director administrative services
director, and shall cease to draw such interest from and after the date fixed by the finance director administrative
services director in a call for the redemption thereof.
C. The five percent required to be held as a reserve to protect laborers and material men for a period of 30 days after
final acceptance of the completion of the work, shall, at the expiration of such period, be paid to the contractor in
warrants on such special fund so far as the same may be free from claims of liens, and which warrants shall draw
interest as above set forth. [Ord. 2565 § 2, 1986; Ord. 1069 § 2, 1964; Ord. 651 § 11, 1954].
Packet Pg. 214
7.4.a
Section 3.40.120 Fixed estimate costs — Procedure.
The cost and expense incurred by the city in engineering and surveying necessary for such improvement, and all cost
of preparing all necessary data, including the cost of ascertaining the ownership of the property included in the
assessment district, advertising and publishing all notices required to be published, shall be called the "fixed
estimate" and all bidders shall include the amount thereof in all such bids. If the cost and expense of the
improvement to be provided by the mode of payment by bonds the contractor or the contract purchaser of the bonds
shall be required to pay the amount of the fixed estimate in cash or certified check to the r,na fl e a:_oete_
administrative services director to be by him placed to the credit of the local improvement fund with which to
redeem all warrants issued for such fixed estimate, and an amount equal therewith in interest bearing warrants shall
be issued to the contractor or the contract purchaser of the bonds. The Fnanee diFeetof administrative services
director shall place so much of said fixed estimate paid in by the contractor or the bond purchaser into the local
improvement district fund as will represent the total sum of the warrants and interest to be drawn on that fund for
fixed estimate costs. The city council shall have the right to vary the amount of the fixed estimate as the
circumstance may require. [Ord. 651 § 12, 1954].
Section 3.40.140 Reductions in area of assessments.
The office of the Tina- e dir-eeter-- administrative services director may accept a reduction in the area of property
subject to an assessment for a local improvement district and apply the balance of the assessment, including interest
and penalties, if any, to the remainder of the property subject to the assessment; provided, that the written consent of
the property owner is filed with the r.... nee dir-eeter administrative services director, and provided further that the
reduction in area will not result in a substantial diminution of the value of the affected property remaining and
subject to assessment. [Ord. 1382 § 1, 1968].
Section 3.50.020 Charges — Insufficient funds and other returned checks.
A charge of $30.00 shall be assessed against any person who has made payment to the city by check for any fee or
charge when such check is returned by the bank against whom it has been drawn due to insufficient funds on
account, closure of the account, or any other reason resulting in the nonpayment of the check. The $30.00 fee shall
be paid prior to the application to any payment against the fee or charge initially assessed. Nothing herein shall be
interpreted to limit or prohibit the city from collecting reasonable attorneys' fees or other collection costs in the
event that it is forced to collect the account through a judicial remedy, nor to prohibit the administrative services
director from waiving such a charge for persons qualifying as low income citizen residents under the provisions of
ECC 7.30.070. [Ord. 3375 § 1, 2001; Ord. 3156 § 1, 1997; Ord. 2740 § 1, 1990].
Section 3.60.140 Appeals.
An appeal from any order or decision of the city council regarding any rate increase shall be solely to the FCC
pursuant to 47 CFR § 76.944 as the same exists or is hereafter amended. Such appeal shall be filed within 30 days.
Appeals from other decisions of the city council regarding the franchise shall be filed in the Snohomish County
Superior Court within 10 business days of the date notice of decision is issued. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to
limit the right of any citizen resident or the city to file a complaint with the FCC regarding any company activity in
accordance with 47 CFR § 76.953 et seq. [Ord. 2968, 1994].
Section 3.75.080 Delinquent payments.
If the assessment is not paid within 60 days after its due date, a delinquency charge shall be added and calculated at
an interest rate of 12 percent per annum of the due amount. The finanee director administrative services director is
authorized to use a city of Edmonds approved collection agency to collect any unpaid assessments. Use of a
collection agency will result in a business paying the agency's fee on top of the amount of the BID assessment plus
delinquency charges. [Ord. 3929 § 1 (Att. A), 2013; Ord. 3909 § 1, 2013].
Packet Pg. 215
7.4.a
Section 3.75.100 Disputes.
Any member seeking to challenge the amount of an assessment or delinquency charge may submit additional
information concerning the assessment classification and/or square footage of the business to the Fnanee diFeeter-
administrative services director or designee, who may adjust the assessment based on Table 1 if he determines that
the original classification and/or square footage was erroneous. The fina ee dir-eeter- administrative services director
shall provide a written determination to the member, which may be appealed to the city's hearing examiner within
10 days of the finanee dir-eeter- administrative services director's determination by paying an appeal fee in the
amount of $250.00 and filing a notice of appeal with the city clerk that sets forth the alleged error in the finance
dir-eete administrative services director's determination. The member has the burden of proof before the hearing
examiner to show that the assessment or delinquency charge is incorrect. [Ord. 4081 § 1, 2017; Ord. 3929 § 1 (Art.
A), 2013; Ord. 3909 § 1, 2013].
Section 3.75.110 Expenditures.
Expenditures from the account shall be made upon vouchers drawn by the fina- ee dir-eeter- administrative services
director and shall be used exclusively for the purposes defined in ECC 3.75.030. [Ord. 3909 § 1, 2013].
Section 3.75.120 Members advisory board.
The EDBID shall be governed by a member advisory board comprised of an odd number of at least seven but no
more than 11 members from the EDBID membership. The board shall be composed of both open-door and
by -appointment office -based EDBID members, respectively, in rough proportion to the dollar value of assessments
to be levied on each classification of businesses. In addition, the F anee airee+er administrative services director and
the community services/economic development director shall be nonvoting, ex officio members of the board.
The member advisory board shall be responsible for proposing any amendments to EDBID bylaws for city council
approval and policy guidelines to the city council that will address, among other matters, the composition and
method of appointing or electing board members. The member advisory board shall also provide advice and
consultation to the ananee a:roe.e-r administrative services director, and to any individual or agency, that may be
hired to manage the day-to-day operations of the business improvement district program, on all matters related to the
operation of the program.
Each year no later than October 31 st the member advisory board shall submit to the city council a proposed annual
work program and budget for the following year, unless otherwise approved by the city council. The board shall
address and discuss member concerns and questions regarding the EDBID and program; review all reports submitted
to the finance department by the member advisory board or program administrator, if hired; and sponsor the annual
member meeting. [Ord. 4081 § 1, 2017; Ord. 3941 § 1 (Art. A), 2013; Ord. 3914 § 1 (Att. A), 2013; Ord. 3909 § 1,
2013].
3.75.130 Business improvement district fund oversight and programmatic support.
The finance director administrative services director shall administer the BID fund for the city with authority to:
A. Consider adjusting the assessment amount based on an erroneous classification or square footage;
B. Collect the assessments; refund assessments when overpaid or otherwise improperly collected; extend the
deadline for payment; and waive delinquency charges and interest whenever the delinquency results from
extenuating circumstances beyond the member's control, such as a casualty loss causing premature closure of the
Packet Pg. 216
7.4.a
business, bankruptcy, or the total principal payment due to the city (exclusive of penalty and interest) is $10.00 or
less;
C. Calculate and collect the interest for late payments; and
D. Accept and deposit advance payment of assessments by members; accept donations from governmental agencies,
the public, and owners and operators of businesses.
E. The community services/economic development director shall provide general support and advice on matters
related to programs, projects, activities and administration of the EDBID. [Ord. 4081 § 1, 2017; Ord. 3909 § 1,
2013].
Section 3.80.010 Marsh restoration and preservation fund.
The administrative services director is hereby authorized to create and number a new fund to be known as the
Edmonds marsh restoration and preservation fund for the purpose of holding city -provided funds and receiving
donations from the eitizeresidents for, or in aid of, the cost of operating, and restoring the Edmonds Marsh,
including the daylighting of Willow Creek. This fund is created and shall be maintained until the end of daylighting
of Willow Creek project and that such donations shall be fully tax deductible and in accordance with the laws of the
United States and the regulations of the Internal Revenue Service. [Ord. 4100 § 1, 20181.
Section 4.68.100 Construction in right-of-way.
A. Notification of City Community Services Department. A franchisee shall submit an application for permit to
perform work in the city's rights -of -way. Permits to perform work in the city's rights -of -way shall be available on
the basis of the most favorable terms and conditions of any other franchisee or utility. The city shall provide an
annual master permit process for the cable system rebuild project, the fees of which will be paid out of the annual
franchisee fees. No work, other than emergency repairs, shall commence without such a permit. Emergency repairs
may be made immediately with notification given to the city no later than the next business day.
B. Installation. In accordance with the permit issued, all transmission lines, equipment, and structures shall be
located and installed so as to cause minimum interference with the rights and reasonable convenience of property
owners, and at all times shall be maintained in a safe condition, and in good order and repair. Suitable barricades,
flags, lights, flares, or other devices shall be used at such times and places as are reasonably required for the safety
of the public. Any poles or other fixtures placed in any street by a franchisee shall be placed in such manner as not
to interfere with the usual travel on such public way.
C. Interference with Use of Streets. A franchisee must obtain an application for permit to perform work in the
rights -of -way for all work performed by the franchisee in such areas. When installing, locating, laying, or
maintaining facilities, apparatus, or improvements, a franchisee shall not interfere with the use of any street to any
greater extent than is necessary, and shall leave the surface of any such street in as good condition as it was prior to
performance by franchisee of such work. Any facility, apparatus, or improvement under this chapter shall be laid,
installed, located, or maintained in conformance with instructions given by, and to the reasonable satisfaction of, the
city. In any event, a franchisee shall, at its own expense, and to the reasonable satisfaction of the city in accordance
with the terms of the application for permit to perform work in the rights -of -way, restore to city standards and
specifications any damage or disturbance caused to streets as a result of franchisee's construction or operations.
D. Relocation/Removal. Upon receipt of 30 days' prior written notice, a franchisee, at its own expense, shall protect,
support, temporarily disconnect, relocate, or remove any of its
property when, in the judgment of the ^^ w ..�:.. ees air-eet , public works director, the same is required by
reason of traffic conditions, public safety, and/or improvements by governmental agencies. Nothing herein shall be
deemed a taking of the property of a franchisee, and franchisee shall be entitled to no surcharge by reason of this
Packet Pg. 217
7.4.a
section. After receipt of 30 days prior written notice, upon failure of a franchisee to commence, pursue, or complete
any work required by the provisions of this chapter to be performed on any street, within the reasonable time
prescribed and to the reasonable satisfaction of the city, the city may, at its option, cause such work to be done, and
a franchisee shall pay to the city the reasonable cost thereof, within 30 days after receipt of demand.
E. Location of Facilities. A franchisee agrees to provide the city with a map or maps which shall show the vertical
and horizontal location of its facilities within the franchise area using a minimum scale of one inch equals 100 feet,
measured from the centerline of the right-of-way, which maps shall be in hard copy plan form acceptable to the city
and in Geographical Information System (GIS) format. This information shall be provided within 90 days of the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter and shall be updated at least every 12 months thereafter. [Ord.
3083 § 1, 1996].
Section 4.68.400 CFAR application requisites.
A. Identification and Ownership Information.
1. Identification of Applicant and Proposed Franchisee.
a. State the name, address, telephone number and web site (if applicable) of the applicant and the proposed
franchisee (if different from applicant).
b. State the name, address, primary telephone number and primary e-mail address of all individual(s)
authorized to represent the applicant before the staff during their consideration of the franchise(s)
requested, including the applicant's primary contact and any additional authorized contacts.
2. Business Structure.
a. Corporation.
i. If applicant is a corporation, please list all officers and members of the board of directors, their
principal affiliations and their addresses;
ii. Attach a certified copy of the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the corporation as well as
certificates of good standing from the Secretary of State of the state of incorporation as well as the
state of Washington; and
iii. State whether the applicant is directly or indirectly controlled by another corporation or legal entity.
If so, attach an explanatory statement and response to subsections (A)(2)(a)(i) and (ii) of this section
concerning the controlling corporation.
b. Partnership.
i. If applicant is a partnership, please describe the structure of the partnership and the interests of
general and limited partners.
ii. State whether the applicant is controlled directly or indirectly by any corporation or other legal
entity. If so, respond to subsections (A)(2)(a)(i) and (ii) or (A)(2)(b)(i) of this section, as applicable,
concerning the controlling entity.
3. Experience.
a. Current Franchises. Please list all cable systems operated by the applicant in the last five years. For each
system, include name of system, address, communities served, number of subscribers, number of homes
passed, date of system award, duration (start and end date) of franchise, status of construction, and percent
of penetration of homes passed as of most recently available date (include date). Also include name, title,
and telephone number of the system manager and authorized representative of the franchising authority.
Packet Pg. 218
7.4.a
b. Pending Franchises. List communities where the applicant or any affiliate currently has a formal or
informal request pending for an initial franchise, the renewal of a franchise, or the approval of a transfer of
ownership. Include names of communities, date of application, date of expected action, and estimated
number of homes. Also include complete contact information of an authorized representative of the
franchise authority.
4. Management Structure. Attach a management/organizational chart showing the management structure of the
applicant. Also, provide a similar chart showing the relationship of the applicant to all general partners, parent
corporations, subsidiaries, affiliates and all other subsidiaries of parent corporation, including a brief
description of each entity's relationship to the applicant.
5. Management Agreement. State whether there are any management agreements existing or proposed between
the applicant and any parent corporation or affiliate related to construction and operation of the applicant's
planned system in Edmonds. If yes, attach a copy of any such agreement.
B. Legal Qualifications.
1. Media Cross -Ownership. Section 613 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 USC Section
533(a), and applicable FCC rules prohibit certain forms of media cross -ownership. Please state whether the
applicant or an affiliate directly or indirectly owns, operates, controls or has an interest in any of the following,
or whether the applicant holds or operates any company or business operating jointly with any of the following
a. A national broadcast television network (such as ABC, CBS or NBC, etc.).
b. A television broadcast station whose predicted Grade B contour, computed in accordance with Section
73.684 of the FCC's rules, overlaps in whole or in part in the city, or an application for license to operate
such a station.
c. A telecommunications or telephone company whose service area includes any portion of the city.
If the response to any of the above is affirmative, state the name of the applicant or affiliate, the nature and
percentage of ownership or interest and the company that is owned or in which the interest is held.
2. Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action. Federal law requires cable system operators to be
certified by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as being in compliance with the equal
employment opportunity requirements of Section 634(e) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47
USC Section 554(e). The applicant shall attach any current FCC certification(s) for its existing cable system
holdings, if any, or indicate its intention to apply for and abide by same.
3. Franchise Violations. State whether the applicant or any affiliate has been found in violation by a regulatory
authority or franchising authority of any franchise ordinance or agreement, contract or regulation governing a
cable system. If so, identify the judicial or administrative proceeding, giving the date, name of tribunal and
result or disposition of that proceeding.
4. Other Violations. State whether the applicant or any affiliate has been found in violation of any franchise,
ordinance, agreement, permit, contract or regulation by a regulatory authority of any other type (e.g., public
utility commission). If so, identify the judicial or administrative proceeding, giving the date, name of tribunal
and result or disposition of that proceeding.
C. Financial Qualifications.
1. For applicants with existing operations: provide audited financial statements, including statements of
income, balance sheets and cash flow statements, together with any notes necessary to the understanding of the
financial statements for the last three fiscal years for the applicant and any parent corporation. Please provide
associated operating statistics including distribution plant miles, homes passed, number of basic cable service
subscribers, and number of subscribers to other tiers or services, including digital services, internet access
services, telephone services and number of premium units, for the operations corresponding to the financial
statements.
Packet Pg. 219
7.4.a
2. For all applicants: provide detailed pro forma projections for both applicant's operations in the city and any
regional or national planned operations of which the city is a part for the next five fiscal years from the date of
the application, including balance sheets, income statements, and statements of cash flows, or, alternatively, at
a minimum, detailed projected income and cash flow statements. Please include associated operating statistic
assumptions for these projections including distribution plant miles, homes passed, number of basic cable
service subscribers, number of subscribers to other tiers or services (e.g., digital service, high-speed internet
access service, telephone service, etc.), and number of premium units. Also, describe any other assumptions
reflected in the projections, including (a) revenue assumptions, such as service rates, (b) expense assumptions,
such as direct costs of service, staffing levels, or anticipated cost inflation, (c) capital expenditure assumptions,
such as miles of plant to be built and costs per mile of construction or per subscriber, and (d) financing
assumptions, such as funds to be borrowed and from whom, interest rates, and timing of repayment, or equity
infusions and distributions. Please provide these projections in electronic (Excel spreadsheet) form as well as in
printed form.
D. Technical Qualifications, Planned Services and Operations.
1. Describe the applicant's planned initial and proposed geographic cable service area, including a map and
proposed dates for offering service to each area;
2. If the applicant has or asserts existing authority to access the public right-of-way in any of the initial or
proposed service areas listed in subsection (D)(1) of this section, state the basis for such authority or asserted
authority and attach the relevant agreements or other documentation of such authority;
3. Describe with particularity the applicant's planned residential cable services, including basic cable services,
cable programming service tiers, and any additional pay -per -view, on -demand or digital services; and the
projected rates for each category or tier or service;
4. Describe with particularity the applicant's planned system technical design, upstream and downstream
capacity and speed, provision for analog or digital services or packages, distribution of fiber, and planned count
of households per residential node;
5. Describe with particularity the applicant's planned nonresidential cable services;
6. Describe the applicant's planned construction and extension or phase schedule, as applicable, including
system extension plans or policy; describe current status of the applicant's existing or proposed arrangements
with area utilities, including pole attachments, vault, or conduit sharing agreements as applicable;
7. Describe the applicant's plan to ensure that the safety, functioning and appearance of property and
convenience and safety of other persons not be adversely affected by installation or construction of the
applicant's facilities, and that property owners are justly compensated for any damages caused by the
installation, construction, operation or removal of the facilities; also state the proposed allocation of costs of
installation, construction, operation or removal of facilities between the applicant and the subscriber;
8. Describe the availability and cost of a device to enable a subscriber to block obscene or indecent
programming; and
9. Describe the applicant's plan to comply with the subscriber privacy protections set forth in 47 USC Section
551.
E. Minimum Franchise Obligations. Please state the applicant's intention to meet each of the following minimum
cable franchise standards:
1. Model Franchises. The applicant shall comply with all provisions of this chapter.
2. Right -of -Way ("ROW") Regulations. The applicant shall stipulate in writing that it will at all times comply
with all applicable and lawful city laws and regulations related to use of the public ROW within the boundaries
of the city.
Packet Pg. 220
7.4.a
3. Nondiscrimination. The applicant shall stipulate that it shall not deny cable service to any group of potential
residential cable subscribers in the cable service area proposed by applicant based on their income.
4. Franchise Fees. The applicant shall pay franchise fees on a monthly basis, unless otherwise agreed to by the
city, at the franchise fee rate established by ordinance for all cable service providers in Edmonds.
F. City Expectations. The applicant will provide a detailed proposal as part of its application regarding each of the
below provisions to enable the city to determine whether the application meets the cable -related needs and interests
of the city.
1. Build -Out. The city expects that all residents within a specified cable service area will have access to
applicant's cable services consistent with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations. The
applicant shall provide a proposal to provide access to cable services to all residents in applicant's proposed
cable service area within a reasonable time period. Maps of existing franchise districts are on file with the
staff s office or available by contacting the city at 425-775-2525. The staff may reconsider cable service areas
proposed by applicant that overlap the geographic boundaries of existing Edmonds cable franchise districts.
Applicant shall clearly specify all build -out criteria and exceptions.
2. PEG Channel Capacity. The applicant shall provide the same channel capacity as available under existing
incumbent city cable franchise agreements. Channel capacity is not limited to channels currently in use but
shall include all available channels under existing franchise agreements.
G. Proposed Franchise Terms. The city's model cable franchise template, Attachment A to this rule, reflects terms
and conditions required of other cable operations in Edmonds as of the effective date of the CFAR. The applicant
shall list any proposed amendments to the model cable franchise template and an explanation as to why the
amendment should be considered by the city. These proposed amendments may either be included in this section of
applicant's CFAR franchise application or shown directly on the model cable franchise template. An electronic copy
of the model cable franchise template may be obtained by calling staff at 425-775-2525 or on the city's web site:
www.ci.edmonds.wa.us.
H. Miscellaneous Provisions. State whether the applicant contemplates the provision of any cable services on its
system under an open video systems ("OVS") regulatory regime, within the meaning of Section 653 of the 1934
Communications Act (47 USC Section 573).
I. Affidavit of Applicant. Each application shall be accompanied by an affidavit substantially in the form set forth
below:
This application of the Applicant is submitted by the undersigned who has been duly
authorized to make the representations within on behalf of the Applicant and certifies the
representations are true and correct.
The Applicant recognizes that all representations are binding on it and that material
misrepresentations or omissions, or failure to adhere to any such representation may result in
a negative staff recommendation to the Edmonds City Council, or denial of a CFAR Franchise
Application by the Edmonds City Council.
Consent is hereby given to the staff and their representatives or agents to make inquiry into
the legal character, technical, financial and other qualifications of the Applicant by contacting
any persons or organizations named herein as references, or by any other appropriate means.
The Applicant recognizes that information submitted is open to public inspection and subject
to the Washington Public Records Law. We advise the Applicant to be familiar with the
Washington Public Records Act at Chapter 42.56 RCW. The Applicant should specifically
identify any information which the Applicant has deemed proprietary, the Staff, as
appropriate, will tender to the Applicant the defense of any request to compel disclosure. By
submitting information which the Applicant deems proprietary or otherwise exempt from
disclosure, the Applicant agrees to defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds and the
Packet Pg. 221
7.4.a
staff from any claim for disclosure including but not limited to expenses including
out-of-pocket costs and attorneys' fees, as well as any judgment entered against the City of
Edmonds or the staff for the attorney fees of the parry requesting disclosure.
Name of Applicant's Authorized Representative:
Affiant's Signature:
Official Position:
Date:
NOTARIZATION
Subscribed and sworn before me this of , 20
Notary Public for Washington:
My Commission expires:
J. Application Fee. The application fee to cover the reasonable cost of processing application is set forth in ECC
4.68.410. The fee shall be equal to the actual, reasonable costs of review, and the application fee shall be considered
a deposit against payment or reimbursement of the city's costs.
K. Review Process.
1. Acceptance of Application. Within 10 business days of receipt of an application, staff shall review the
application to ensure all requisite information is included in the application.
a. If the application is not complete, staff will notify the applicant in writing within 10 business days,
listing the requisite information that is required to complete the application and notifying the applicant that
the time period for granting or denying the application set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41 will not begin to
run until such information is received.
b. If the application is complete, staff will notify the applicant in writing within five business days by
certified mail that all requisite information has been received.
2. Staff Review. Staff shall review all completed applications based on the review criteria set forth herein. If,
during the review of an application, staff requires additional information from the applicant, staff will promptly
request the information from the applicant, in writing, along with a notification that the time period for granting
or denying the application set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41 will be tolled until such information is received by
the staff. After completing the review, staff shall provide an analysis of the application and recommendations to
the Edmonds city council.
3. Public Notification and Opportunity to Comment. The Edmonds city council may hold a public hearing to
provide the applicant and residents in the proposed cable service area prompt notice and an opportunity to
comment on any CFAR franchise application. Notice requirements for public hearings shall be provided 10
business days in advance; provided, however, that the administrative services director may shorten or alter
these requirements as needed to meet the deadline for a council decision set forth in 47 CFR Section 76.41,
unless the applicant and the staff agree to extend the deadline.
4. Review Criteria. The staff may recommend to the city council denial of an application if any of the following
exists:
a. The applicant does not have the financial, technical, or legal qualifications to provide cable service; or
Packet Pg. 222
7.4.a
b. The applicant will not provide adequate public, educational, and governmental access channel capacity,
facilities, or financial support, as evidenced by the most recent needs ascertainment conducted by or on
behalf of the staff or other relevant study of community needs; or
c. The applicant will not meet the city's minimum reasonable build -out requirements; or
d. The applicant's proposed terms do not comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and
regulations including, but not limited to, local customer service standards or relevant existing city
contractual obligations; or
e. Applicant has made material misrepresentations or omissions, or has failed to adhere to any such
representations.
5. Length of Franchise. A franchise granted under these provisions shall expire on the date established in the
review process, in no event later than April 26, 2011, the same date as any underlying, nonexclusive cable
franchise previously granted by the city. This franchise length has been established in order to permit full
assessment of the needs of the city and its eitizen residents as permitted by 47 USC Section 521, et seq., and the
regulations promulgated thereunder as this chapter is revised. [Ord. 4269 § 4, 2022; Ord. 3668 § 2, 2007].
Section 4.98.030 Grounds for denial of application — Limited.
No permit shall be denied by the city except upon the following grounds:
A. The event location or desired parade route conflicts with another event for which a permit has already been
issued; or
B. The proposed event location or route would unreasonably prevent or block the provision of emergency services
within the city of Edmonds or would unduly disturb the convenience of the public in the use of public streets and
sidewalks.
In the event that a permit is denied for the reasons stated in subsection (A) or (B) of this section, the city of
Edmonds shall work with the applicant to find an unencumbered time, date, location, or route suitable to the
applicant. The requirement of a permit for constitutionally protected events or expressive events shall not be used or
administered to prevent the exercise of free speech by any individual or group of individuals so long as the event or
route is reasonable as to its time, place and manner. It is the policy of the city of Edmonds to permit, encourage and
promote the lawful exercise of free speech by all of its eitizen residents regardless of the content thereof. [Ord. 4269
§ 8, 2022; Ord. 3661 § 1, 2007].
Section 4.100.010 Purpose.
It is the purpose of the city to establish a process for permitting special events that impact city rights -of -way, public
property and other facilities or services. It is recognized that these special events enhance the city of Edmonds
community and provide benefits to the citizen residents through the creation of venues for expression and
entertainment that are not normally provided as a part of governmental services.
This chapter is intended to supplement land use and street right-of-way regulations, to provide a coordinated process
for the regulation of certain activities to be conducted in conjunction with special events, and to ensure that the
impacts of the special event do not unduly impact the public's health, safety or welfare. It is further intended to
protect and preserve public infrastructure and city resources, prevent unplanned disruption of public services,
mitigate impacts to the extent feasible and create a mechanism for cost recovery without having an adverse effect on
those events that contribute to the community. [Ord. 4269 § 9, 2022].
Packet Pg. 223
7.4.a
5.05.121 Potentially dangerous dogs.
The provisions of this section apply to the extent they are not inconsistent with the provisions of Chapter 16.08
RCW.
A. Declaration of a Dog as Potentially Dangerous. The animal control authority shall have the authority to declare a
dog to be potentially dangerous, and place restrictions on such dog, if the animal control authority has probable
cause to believe that the dog falls within the definitions set forth in ECC 5.05.010(M). The declaration must be
based upon:
1. The written complaint of a eifizen resident who is willing to testify that the animal has acted in a manner
which causes it to fall within the definition of ECC 5.05.010(M);
2. Animal bite report(s) filed with the animal control authority;
3. Action(s) of the animal witnessed by any employee of the animal control authority or law enforcement
officer; or
4. Other substantial evidence.
B. Exclusions. A dog shall not be declared potentially dangerous if the animal control authority determines, by a
preponderance of the evidence, that the threat, injury, or bite alleged to have been committed by the dog was
sustained by a person who was at the time committing a willful trespass or other tort upon the premises occupied by
the owner of the dog, or who was tormenting, abusing, or assaulting the dog, or who had been in the past observed
or reported to have tormented, abused, or assaulted the dog, or who was committing or attempting to commit a
crime.
C. Prohibited Ownership. No person(s) under the age(s) of 18 years old shall own a potentially dangerous dog, as
defined in ECC 5.05.010(M.)
D. Notice of Animal Control Authority Declaration. If the animal control authority receives a report of a potentially
dangerous animal, it shall immediately initiate an investigation including, but not limited to, interviewing the
complainant(s), interviewing the owner of the animal, if known, and observing the animal. Upon completion of its
investigation, if the animal is declared potentially dangerous, the animal control authority shall prepare a written
declaration.
1. The declaration shall be in writing and served on the owner in one of the following methods:
a. Certified and regular mail to the owner's last known address; or
b. Personally; or
c. If the owner cannot be located by one of the first two methods, by publication in a newspaper of general
circulation.
2. The declaration shall include, but is not limited to:
a. A description of the dog;
b. The name and address of the owner of the dog, if known;
c. The whereabouts of the dog if not in custody of the owner;
d. A brief summary of the facts upon which the declaration is based, if known, including the definition of
potentially dangerous under which the declaration is being made;
e. A statement of any restrictions placed on the animal or owner as a result of the declaration; and
Packet Pg. 224
7.4.a
f. The ability and process for appealing the declaration by submitting a written request to the Edmonds
municipal court clerk within five business days of receipt of the declaration.
E. Appeal. Appeals shall be heard by the judge of the Edmonds municipal court and conducted in accordance with
ECC 5.05.123. [Ord. 3895 § 1, 2012; Ord. 3786 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3451 § 1, 2003].
Section 5.05.127.1 Spay or neuter of owner -surrendered and stray animals required.
A. Stray dogs and cats at least two months of age from the city's animal control service area that are placed at and
retained by the city designated shelter, and dogs and cats owned by eitizen residents residing within the city's animal
control service area that are surrendered at the city's designated shelter, shall be spayed or neutered, and verification
of said surgery shall be provided before animals are adopted. Provided, however, that any animal which has not been
spayed or neutered, and which is currently licensed pursuant to ECC 5.05.020 or 5.05.025 shall not be subject to be
spayed or neutered until the notification period of 10 days established by ECC 5.05.126(D) has expired.
B. The city's designated veterinarian(s) shall determine if said animals are appropriate candidates for surgery. Dogs
and cats determined by the city's designated veterinarian to be permanently inappropriate candidates for surgery
may be adopted without surgery. Dogs and cats at least two months of age who are determined to be temporarily
inappropriate candidates for surgery, and dogs and cats under two months of age, may be adopted without surgery,
providing that a $50.00 deposit shall be collected from the adopter. Said deposit shall be returned to the adopter
upon receipt of written verification that the animal has been spayed or neutered within six months of adoption. If the
spay or neuter surgery is performed by a city designated veterinarian, the basic surgical costs will be paid by the city
as outlined in ECC 5.05.127.2. If the animal is determined to be a permanently inappropriate surgical candidate the
surgery will not be required. In such cases the deposit shall be returned to the adopter upon written verification by a
veterinarian of the animal's inappropriate surgical candidacy. Failure to have the animal spayed or neutered within
the specified time period will result in the forfeiture of the deposit and the deposit shall be placed in the city of
Edmonds' animal benefit fund.
C. Dogs or cats which have been spayed or neutered at city expense shall be subject to a fee of $50.00 as provided in
this chapter. This fee, unlike the deposit provided for in subsection (B) of this section, shall not be refundable.
D. When scheduling prohibits a timely spay or neuter surgery by the city's designated veterinarian(s), the new
adoptive family member will be allowed to take the animal home after signing an affidavit promising to return the
animal to the designated veterinarian(s) at a scheduled appointment time made by the animal control authority.
Failure to keep the scheduled appointment for the animal will constitute a violation of this chapter with the adoptive
person subject to a penalty under EMC 5.05.127.4. [Ord. 3681 § 1, 2008; Ord. 3486 § 2, 2004; Ord. 3451 § 1, 2003].
5.05.127.2 Animal benefit appropriation.
A. The city council may from time to time appropriate during its annual budgeting process an amount for the
purpose of financially assisting low-income city of Edmonds residents in obtaining spay or neuter services for their
dogs or cats, and providing for spay and neuter services for stray dogs and cats from the city's animal control service
area that are placed at and retained by the city designated shelter, and dogs and cats owned by eitize residents
residing within the city's animal control service area that are surrendered at the city designated shelter prior to their
adoption back into the community. Application may be made to the city of Edmonds animal benefit appropriation to
effectuate this purpose.
B. The city may grant a financial assistance voucher to a resident in the amount of $30.00 to be applied toward the
costs of obtaining spay or neuter services for an animal by the city's designated veterinarian(s); provided, that
except in cases involving the spay or neuter of owner -surrendered or stray animals that will be returned to the city's
designated animal shelter, proof of the animal owner's city of Edmonds residency, as well as a statement of financial
need, shall be required as a prerequisite to receiving said financial assistance voucher.
Packet Pg. 225
7.4.a
C. After performing the necessary spay or neuter surgery upon an animal, the city's designated veterinarian(s) may
submit an invoice to the city of Edmonds requesting reimbursement. The invoice will be paid at full cost of agreed
upon prevailing industry standards for spay and neuter services for stray dogs and cats from the city's animal control
service area that are placed at and retained by the city designated shelter, and dogs and cats owned by e-itizen
residents residing within the city's animal control service area that are surrendered at the city designated shelter.
D. After performing the necessary spay or neuter surgeries upon an animal, the city's designated veterinarian(s) may
submit an invoice for $30.00 for the financial assistance voucher. For the financial assistance voucher, the invoice
shall be submitted with a photocopy of said voucher attached, shall be signed by a veterinarian, and shall contain the
following information:
1. Identification of the animal.
2. Identification of the person requesting the spay or neuter services for the animal.
3. Identification of the specific type of spay or neuter services performed.
4. Date of performance of the spay or neuter services.
E. Within 30 days of receiving an invoice for spay or neuter services performed by the city's designated
veterinarian(s), the city shall provide payment to the designated veterinarian in the amount of $30.00 per financial
assistance voucher or paid at full cost of agreed upon prevailing industry standards for spay and neuter services for
stray dogs and cats from the city's animal control service area that are placed at and retained by the city designated
shelter, and dogs and cats owned by eitizen residents residing within the city's animal control service area that are
surrendered at the city designated shelter. Said amount shall be drawn exclusively from the city's animal benefit
appropriation. [Ord. 3858 § 1, 2011; Ord. 3451 § 1, 2003].
Section 5.05.127.3 Definitions and integration of initiative provisions.
ECC 5.05.127.1 and 5.05.127.2 have been adopted pursuant to a even residents initiative. The initiative's
provisions utilize terms which are not defined and in some cases are different than terms utilized in the ordinance
codified in this chapter and/or in the day to day administration of the city's animal control system.
A. Definitions. When used in ECC 5.05.127.1 and 5.05.127.2, these terms shall have the following definitions:
1. "Designated shelter" shall mean the location designated by ordinance or contract for the custody of stray or
other animals by the animal control system of the city and shall include terms such as "designated kennel."
2. "Designated veterinarian(s)" shall mean the veterinarian(s), entity or organization with whom the city has
contracted to perform the services required under this chapter.
3. "Deposit" shall mean that portion of the adoption fee which is refundable upon proof of spaying/neutering of
the adopted animal. The term does not include administrative fees, fines, or other charges established by this
chapter or other city ordinance.
4. "Agreed upon prevailing industry standards for spay and neuter services" shall be determined by reference to
the rate established by ordinance or a contract with the designated veterinarian(s).
B. Integration. The provisions of ECC 5.05.127.1 and 5.05.127.2 have been adopted pursuant to initiative
(hereinafter "initiative provisions"). Initiatives are prohibited by state law from imposing administrative detail or
from exercising powers delegated specifically to the city council. In the event of ambiguity or conflict regarding the
provisions of ECC 5.05.127.1 or 5.05.127.2, the following rules of interpretation shall apply:
1. With respect to the interpretation of any term or concept of the initiative provisions relating to the adoption
of dogs or cats from the city's designated shelter, any ambiguity or conflict relating to adoption shall be
Packet Pg. 226
7.4.a
interpreted to require or encourage the spaying or neutering of dogs or cats adopted from the city's animal
control system.
2. With respect to ambiguities or conflicts between the initiative provisions and administrative provisions of
city code, or any contract approved by the city council, the administrative provisions of city code or a contract
shall control.
3. With respect to ambiguity or conflict between the initiative provisions and any exercise of a power delegated
to the legislative power of the city council by statute or the Washington State Constitution, the exercise of the
city council's legislative power shall control.
4. Any attempt by the initiative provisions, including Section 3 of Ordinance 3435, to exercise a power in
excess of powers available through the initiative process and/or to exercise a power which is unavailable to the
city shall be void and interpreted in a manner consistent with the scope of initiative powers. [Ord. 3451 § 1,
2003].
Chapter 5.30
NOISE ABATEMENT AND CONTROL
Sections:
5.30.010
Declaration of policy.
5.30.020
Definitions.
5.30.030
Unlawful sounds.
5.30.040
Maximum permissible sound levels.
5.30.050
Modification to maximum permissible sound levels.
5.30.060
Motor vehicle noises — Stationary test.
5.30.070
Motor vehicle noises — Road test.
5.30.080
Mufflers.
5.30.090
Tire noise.
5.30.100
Exemptions.
5.30.110
Sounds exempt during daytime hours.
5.30.120
Variances.
5.30.130
Public disturbance noises.
5.30.140
Citizen Resident complaints.
5.30.150
Penalties.
5.30.160
Severability.
5.30.200
Quiet zones — Establishment.
5.30.210
Criteria for establishing a quiet zone.
5.30.220
Quiet zone signs.
5.30.230
Noise prohibited in quiet zones.
5.30.240
Schedule of quiet zones.
Section 5.30.010 Declaration of policy.
It is hereby declared to be the policy of the city of Edmonds to minimize the exposure of eitizen residents to the
physiological and psychological dangers of excessive noise and to protect, promote and preserve the public health,
safety and general welfare. It is the express intent of the city council to control the level of noise in a manner which
promotes commerce, the use, value and enjoyment of property, sleep and repose, and the quality of the environment.
[Ord. 4074 § 1 (Att. A), 2017; Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 2193, 1981].
Packet Pg. 227
7.4.a
Section 5.30.140 Citizen Resident complaints.
Whenever it is stated in writing by three or more persons having separate residences in a neighborhood that any
person is violating any of the provisions of this chapter, the noise control administrator or his/her designee shall
review such complaints. After the noise control administrator or his/her designee determines that a violation has
occurred, the administrator or his/her designee shall advise the owner of the complaint and that such violation is a
nuisance and must cease. Failure of any person to cease any violation of this chapter shall be subject to penalties as
established in this chapter. [Ord. 4074 § 1 (Att. A), 2017; Ord. 3989 § 2, 2015; Ord. 2853 § 27, 1991; Ord. 2531,
1985; Ord. 2193 § 15, 1981].
5.48.030 Authority to accept bail.
The court, may by its order, authorize the violations bureau to receive the deposit of bail for appearance in court for
specified offenses under a bail schedule issued under this chapter. The violations bureau, upon accepting the
prescribed bail, shall issue a receipt to the alleged violator, and whatever other information the court requires,
prepared in multiple copies, and shall provide information of the legal consequences of bail forfeiture. One copy of
the receipt shall be forwarded to the finanee dir-eeter- administrative services director and one copy shall be retained
by the violations bureau. [Ord. 2531, 1985; Ord. 1481, 1970].
Title 6
HEALTH AND SANITATION
Chapters:
6.10 HealthOfficer Mies
6.20 Nuisances
6.30 Noxious Weeds
6.40 Litter Control
6.50 Repealed
6.60 Disaster Preparation, Emergency Coordination, and Civil Emergencies
6.65 Edmonds Fire Department — Provision of Emergency Services
6.70 Repealed
6.80 Plastic Bag Reduction
6.90 Noncompostable Food Service Containers Prohibition
6.95 Single -Use Plastic Utensils — Prohibition
Packet Pg. 228
7.4.a
1 1 1
Ciil. !7S!!Eff!!T.l�l.S'i..ETds}a�'.f:LSf�'J�'iTSIS.T.Rl1�1�:T�F'�'!�.!!!MI"
..
OWN
I•
IRWIN
Section 6.20.020 Definitions.
The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this chapter:
A. "Antique vehicle" means a vehicle that is at least 40 years old and is qualified pursuant to WAC 308-96A-073.
B. "Driveway" means an improved surface per city engineering standards designed and used for accessing a parking
area and/or for vehicle parking.
C. "Emergency" means a situation in which the ees aireetef planning and development director
reasonably determines that immediate abatement or other action is necessary in order to prevent, reduce or eliminate
an immediate threat to health, safety or property.
Q
Packet Pg. 229
7.4.a
D. "Front yard" means a space on the same lot as a principal building, extending the full width of the lot, and
situated between the street right-of-way and the front line of the building projected to the side lines of the lot. In the
case of a double frontage lot, both spaces with street frontage shall be considered front yards.
E. "Junk vehicle" means a vehicle meeting any two of the following criteria:
1. Is extensively damaged, including but not limited to any of the following conditions: a broken or missing
windshield or missing wheels, tires, motor or transmission;
2. Is apparently inoperable;
3. Is without valid current registration plates;
4. Has an approximate fair market value equal only to the approximate value of the scrap in it.
F. "Inoperable" with respect to a vehicle means that the vehicle is incapable of being legally operated on a public
roadway due to the condition of the vehicle or the status of the ownership, registration, or license of the vehicle.
G. "Junk" means discarded, broken or disabled material including but not limited to household items, house or lawn
furniture, appliances, toys, construction items, hot tubs, trampolines, vehicle parts, or other items that are not neatly
stored or in a functioning condition.
H. "Litter" means discarded waste materials, including but not limited to paper, wrappings, packaging material and
discarded or used containers.
1. "Motor vehicle" means a vehicle that is self-propelled but not operated upon rails, and includes neighborhood
electric vehicles as defined in RCW 46.04.357. An electric personal assistive mobility device is not considered a
motor vehicle. A power wheelchair is not considered a motor vehicle.
J. "Operable" with respect to a vehicle means that the vehicle is a licensed motorized or nonmotorized vehicle which
in its current condition is legally and physically capable of being operated on a public roadway.
K. "Rear yard" means a space on the same lot with a principal building, extending the full width of the lot and
situated between the rear line of the lot and the rear line of the building projected to the side lines of the lot.
L. "Salvage" means an item that would otherwise be destroyed, rejected or discarded but is or may be recycled or
put to further use.
M. "Side yard" means a space on the same lot with a principal building, situated between the building and the side
lot line and extending from the rear line of the front yard to the front line of the rear yard.
N. "Stagnant" means water or liquid that has become foul, stale or impure through lack of agitation, flow or
movement.
O. "Trash" means waste food products and other household garbage.
P. "Vehicle" means any motorized or non -motorized conveyance that includes, but is not limited to, an automobile,
recreational vehicle, truck, any type of trailer, van, motorcycle, watercraft, farm equipment, construction equipment
and antique vehicles (i.e., cars, trucks, vans, motorcycles, carriages, or motorized buggies). [Ord. 3720 § 4, 2008].
Section 6.20.042 Health and safety nuisances.
The following actions or conditions have a direct impact on public health and are declared to be public nuisances.
A. Vegetation. The following actions and/or conditions shall be public nuisances:
Packet Pg. 230
7.4.a
1. Any dead, dying or other hazardous tree which is in danger of falling and endangers the traveling public on a
street, alley, sidewalk or other public right-of-way. The word "tree" shall have the same meaning as is provided
in ECDC-23.10.020. 18.^� �40.
2. Any violation of the noxious weed provisions of Chapter 6.30 ECC and/or any uncultivated berry vines and
Class B or Class C noxious weeds (as classified by the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board) which
exceed an average of three feet in height and any portion of which are located within five feet of an adjacent
property.
B. Attractive Nuisances. Any attractive nuisances dangerous to children are declared to be public nuisances,
including but not limited to the following items when located outside of a fully enclosed building:
1. Abandoned, broken or neglected equipment;
2. Jagged, sharp or otherwise potentially dangerous machinery;
3. Household or commercial appliances, including but not limited to refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers,
dishwashers, ovens, hot water tanks, or toilets;
4. Unpermitted excavations; and/or
5. Unprotected or open wells or shafts.
C. Breeding Grounds for Vermin or Insects. The following actions and/or conditions are public nuisances:
1. Any accumulations of perishable matter, including but not limited to foodstuffs, that may harbor or attract
the infestation of mold, insects and/or vermin; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply to compost
heaps or facilities which are maintained in accordance with standards recommended by the U.S. Composting
Council.
2. Any stagnant, pooled water in which mosquitoes, flies or other insects may reproduce.
3. Any stacks or accumulations of newspapers, cardboard, or other paper, cloth, plastic, or rubber left or stored
in a manner which poses a substantial risk of combustion, a threat of fire, or that may harbor, serve as an
attraction for or promote the infestation of mold, insects and/or vermin.
D. Hazardous Conditions, Substances or Materials. The following conditions or actions are declared to be public
nuisances:
1. Any structure or other constructed object not governed by the International Building Code that is decayed,
damaged, or in disrepair and poses a substantial threat of collapse, structural failure or falling.
2. Any unstable embankment, fill or other accumulation of rock and/or soil which poses a substantial threat of
collapse.
3. Any storage or keeping of any toxic, flammable, or caustic substance or material except in compliance with
applicable requirements of state or federal law.
4. Any unpermitted obstruction of any street, alley, crossing or sidewalk, and any unpermitted excavation
therein or thereunder. [Ord. 3720 § 4, 2008].
Section 6.20.050 Enforcement and abatement.
A. Responsibility for Enforcement. The provisions of this chapter shall be enforced by the community serviees
director planning and development director or his/her designee.
Packet Pg. 231
7.4.a
B. Responsibility for Violation. The provisions of this chapter shall be enforceable against any person who causes,
permits, creates, maintains or allows upon any premises, any of the actions or conditions designated as public
nuisances under ECC 6.20.040, including but not limited to any person or entity owning, leasing, renting,
occupying, or possessing the underlying premises.
C. Penalties. Any person violating this chapter shall be subject to civil enforcement proceedings pursuant to Chapter
20.110 ECDC and/or criminal misdemeanor prosecution.
D. Abatement. The city may seek a warrant of abatement from Snohomish County Superior Court authorizing city
personnel and/or contractors to enter any premises containing a public nuisance and abate said nuisance at the
violator's expense. Prior to obtaining such a warrant, the city shall provide written notice to the responsible party by
posting upon the subject premises, mailing and/or personal delivery. Such notice may be combined with a notice of
civil violation issued pursuant to Chapter 20.110 ECDC, and shall contain: (1) a description of the public nuisance;
(2) a reasonable deadline by which the responsible party must eliminate the public nuisance; (3) a warning that the
city may abate the nuisance at the responsible party's expense; and (4) a statement that the notice shall become a
final order of the city if not appealed to the hearing examiner within the time period specified in Chapter 20.110
ECDC. All costs incurred by the city in abating a public nuisance, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, staff
time and contractor expenses, shall be recovered from the responsible party. Abatement may be exercised
concurrently with or alternatively to the imposition of civil and/or criminal penalties pursuant to subsection (C) of
this section.
E. Summary Abatement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the city may, to the fullest extent
legally permissible, summarily abate and/or take any action necessary to eliminate any condition constituting an
immediate threat to public health or safety.
F. Mediation. Notwithstanding any provision of this code, when the planning and development director determines,
in his discretion, that significant risk to any person exists and the best interests of the neighborhood would be better
served, the director may decline to proceed with prosecution or abatement until the complainant(s) and alleged
violator(s) have attempted to resolve their conflict through mediation.
G. Frivolous Complaint. Any person making a frivolous complaint under the provisions of this chapter shall be
guilty of a civil infraction punishable by a fine of not more than $500.00. [Ord. 4299 Exh. A, 2023; Ord. 3720 § 4,
2008].
Section 6.20.060 Separate abatement proceedings for junk vehicles.
A. Statutes Adopted by Reference.
1. RCW 46.55.010(2), (3), (4), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11) and (12) only;
2. RCW 46.55.070, Posting requirements — Exception;
3. RCW 46.55.090, Storage, return requirements — Personal belongings — Combination endorsement for tow
truck drivers — Authority to view impounded vehicle;
4. RCW 46.55.100, Impound notice — Abandoned vehicle;
5. RCW 46.55.110, Notice to legal and registered owners;
6. RCW 46.55.120, Redemption of vehicle — Sale of unredeemed vehicles;
7. RCW 46.55.130, Notice requirements — Public auction — Accumulation of storage charges;
8. RCW 46.55.140, Operator's lien, deficiency claim, liability; and
9. RCW 46.55.230, Junk vehicles — Certification, notification, removal, sale.
Packet Pg. 232
7.4.a
B. Administrative Hearing Officer. All abatement hearings required under this section shall be conducted by the
hearing examiner. A decision made by the hearing examiner under this section regarding abatement shall be final as
to abatement. Any abatement hearing under this section shall be considered a separate matter from any hearing
regarding the underlying violation outlined in the previous sections of this chapter. Provided, however, that the
hearing examiner may in his/her discretion combine such hearings if two separate rulings are issued.
C. Abatement and Removal of Unauthorized Junk Motor Vehicles or Parts Thereof from Private Property.
1. The storage or retention of an unauthorized junk motor vehicle or parts thereof, as defined herein, on private
property is hereby declared a public nuisance subject to removal and impoundment. The
direetafplannin,g and development director shall inspect and investigate complaints relative to unauthorized
junk motor vehicles or parts thereof on private property. Upon discovery of such nuisance, the community`
sefviees dir-eetor-planning and development director shall give notice in writing to the last registered owner of
record, if identifiable, and the property owner of the violation of the nuisance provisions and demand that both
abate the nuisance or the vehicle will be removed and costs will be assessed against them. The notice shall also
inform both that a hearing before the hearing examiner may be requested in writing, directed to the city clerk
within 10 days of said notice, and that if no hearing is requested within 10 days, the vehicle will be removed at
their expense.
2. If a request for a hearing is received, a notice giving the time, location, and date of the hearing on the
question of abatement and removal of the vehicle or parts thereof as a public nuisance shall be mailed, by
certified mail with a five-day return receipt requested, to the owner of the land as shown on the last equalized
assessment roll and to the last registered and legal owner of record unless the vehicle is in such condition that
the identification numbers are not available to determine ownership.
3. The owner of the land on which the vehicle is located may appear in person at the hearing or present a
written statement in time for consideration at the hearing, and deny responsibility for the presence of the
vehicle on the land, with reasons for the denial and that she/he has not given consent for the vehicle to be
located there. If it is determined at the hearing that the vehicle was placed on the land without the consent of
the landowner and that she/he has not subsequently acquiesced in its presence, then the hearing examiner shall
not assess costs of administration or removal of the vehicle against the owner of the property upon which the
vehicle is located or otherwise order recoupment of such costs from the owner of the property.
4. Costs of removal of vehicles or parts thereof under this section shall be assessed against the last registered
owner of the vehicle or automobile hulk if the identity of the owner can be determined, unless the owner in the
transfer of ownership of the vehicle or automobile hulk complied with RCW 46.12.101, or the costs may be
assessed against the owner of the property on which the vehicle is stored, unless the property owner establishes
the facts set forth in subsection (C)(3) of this section.
5. This section shall not apply to:
a. A vehicle or part thereof that is completely enclosed within a building in a lawful manner where it is not
visible from the street or other public or private property; or
b. A vehicle or part thereof that is stored or parked in a lawful manner on private property in connection
with the business of a licensed dismantler or licensed vehicle dealer and is screened according to RCW
46.80.130.
6. After notice has been given of the city's intent to dispose of the vehicle and after a hearing, if requested, has
been held, the vehicle or parts thereof shall be removed at the request of the ^^w,,,,unity services director
planning and development director and disposed of to a licensed motor vehicle wrecker or hulk hauler with
written notice being provided to the Washington State Patrol and the Department of Licensing that the vehicle
has been wrecked or otherwise lawfully disposed of.
D. Owner of Record Presumed Liable for Costs When Vehicle Abandoned — Exceptions.
Packet Pg. 233
7.4.a
1. The abandonment of any junk vehicle or hulk shall constitute a prima facie presumption that the last owner
of record is responsible for such junk vehicle and thus liable for any costs incurred in removing, storing and
disposing of said vehicle.
2. A registered owner transferring a vehicle shall be relieved from personal liability under this chapter if within
five days of the transfer she/he transmits to the planning division a seller's report of sale on a form prescribed
by the planning manager to show that the vehicle had been transferred prior to the date notice was given to
him/her of the need to abate.
E. Owner or Agent Required to Pay Charges — Lien.
1. Any costs incurred in the removal and storage of an impounded vehicle shall be a lien upon the vehicle. All
towing and storage charges on such vehicle impounded shall be paid by the owner or his/her agent if the
vehicle is redeemed. In the case of abandoned vehicles, all costs of removal and storage shall be paid by the
owner or his/her agent if the vehicle is redeemed, but if not redeemed, such costs shall be received from the
proceeds of sale.
2. Either a registered or legal owner may claim an impounded vehicle by payment of all charges that have
accrued to the time of reclamation. If the vehicle was impounded at the direction of a law enforcement agency,
the person in possession of the vehicle prior to the time of reclamation shall notify such agency of the fact that
the vehicle has been claimed, and by whom.
F. Written Impound Authorization Form. Whenever the ^emff, nity sei=vi es dir-eeter- planning and development
director impounds a vehicle pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, the director shall complete an authorization
form approved by the chief of police which specifies the section of this chapter or Chapter 46.55 RCW authorizing
the impound. In the alternative, a law enforcement notice of infraction or citation for an offense which authorized
the impound may be substituted at the director's discretion. [Ord. 3720 § 4, 2008].
Section 6.40.200 Enforcement officers and procedures.
Enforcement of this chapter may be by any police officer or other law enforcement officer, fire department and
building division personnel, jurisdictional health department personnel, and those public employees charged with the
responsibility of operating and maintaining all public places within the provisions of this chapter. All such
enforcement officers are empowered to issue citations to and/or arrest without warrant persons violating the
provisions of this chapter. Said enforcement officers may serve and execute all warrants, citations and other process
issued by the courts. In addition, mailing by registered mail of such warrant, citation or other process to the last
known place of residence of the offender shall be deemed as personal service upon the person charged. Nothing
herein shall be construed to prohibit even resident's complaints or arrests as may be otherwise permitted under
applicable state regulations, state statute, ordinance or court rule. [Ord. 1610, 1972].
Section 6.60.010 Purposes.
The purpose of this chapter is to protect the lives and property of the eitizen residents of Edmonds in the event of an
emergency, disaster, or civil emergency through planning, training and organization and by authorizing the exercise
of emergency powers as prescribed by RCW 38.52.070 and the city's home rule police powers. [Ord. 4291 § 1 (Exh.
A), 2023; Ord. 4177 § 1, 2020; Ord. 2224 § 1, 1981].
Section 7.10.025 Delinquency charge.
A charge equal to $25.00 shall be added as a fee to each delinquent utility bill, except in cases of extraordinary
hardship as determined by the finance director administrative services director or his/her designee. The decision of
the finance director administrative services director can be appealed to the Edmonds city council by filing an appeal
Packet Pg. 234
7.4.a
with the city clerk no later than 14 days after the director's decision was mailed. The account shall be considered
delinquent if full payment is not made within 35 days after the sending of the regular billing. Such delinquency
notice and billing will be provided 35 days following the mailing of a regular utility bill. This charge shall be
applicable to all delinquent utility billing accounts. In order to be considered delinquent the outstanding principal
balance of an account must total at least $40.00, and no delinquency charge shall be levied against any account
balance under $40.00. This delinquency charge shall be paid prior to the application of any payment against the fee
or charge initially assessed and nothing herein shall be interpreted to limit the city's collection of its attorneys' fees
and other reasonable costs and charges in the event it is forced to seek judicial remedy for collection. Nothing herein
shall be interpreted to limit the city's ability to enforce a sewerage lien on properties for delinquent and unpaid
sewerage utility bills, as authorized by RCW 35.67.200 through 35.67.290, including terminating water service until
charges are paid and/or pursuing sewerage lien foreclosure. [Ord. 4000 § 1, 2015; Ord. 3629 § 4, 2007].
Section 7.10.060 Limitation on water use.
In the event that a supplier notifies the city of a shortage of water or the director reasonably determines such a
shortage to be imminent, the eenu „nity seFv ees dir-eeter- public works director or his/her designee is authorized to
implement the water shortage response plan in order to efficiently safeguard the safety and health of the general
public or to provide for the public convenience. The use of water in the city, or in any portion thereof, for irrigation,
cooling, sprinkling or other uses may be forbidden, restricted, or regulated and such regulations may be made
effective as to all customers or as to particular classes of customers. Rationing may be imposed during any shortage
of water, either in lieu of or in addition to other measures hereby authorized.
A. Upon receiving notification from a water supplier of an impending water emergency, the eemmtmity se
dir-eete public works director will notify the mayor and city council within 24 hours or on the next business day that
a water emergency will be or has been declared.
B. The mayor or public works director will issue a public notification of the declaration
of water emergency and imposition of restrictions.
C. Restrictions will be in effect immediately upon issuance of the public notification. Restrictions and the amount of
surcharge for violations of mandatory restrictions will be posted and published within seven days of declaration at
least one time in a daily newspaper of general circulation. Notification will be delivered to television and radio
stations to provide public information coverage.
D. For emergencies when restrictions may extend beyond 21 days, public hearing before the city council will be
scheduled by the ^,.m+ri.nity sefvi es dire ter- public works director within seven days following the declaration of
emergency. [Ord. 2774 § 1, 1990].
Section 7.10.061 Water restrictions — Powers of the city.
The community services director public works director or his/her designee shall conduct public education efforts
regarding the benefits and necessity of conservation by the public, and is authorized to promulgate such rules and
regulations as may be necessary to implement water use restriction. The regulations will be on file with the city
clerk, and the regulations and any amendment thereto shall be effective 30 days after said filing with the city clerk.
The ee ff riiunityser-vieesdire ter- public works director or his/her designee is further authorized to make exceptions
to such restrictions in specific cases as he/she finds reasonable which may in the director's discretion include, but
are not limited to, watering newly seeded or sodded lawns, food sources, landscape ornamental plantings required by
the architectural design board, when necessary to alleviate unnecessary economic hardship to commercial or
industrial activities, or to prevent possible damage to health, safety or welfare. [Ord. 2774 § 2, 1990].
Packet Pg. 235
7.4.a
Section 7.10.062 Water restrictions — Surcharge.
It is unlawful for any person to violate water use and restrictions and violation of these provisions shall be a
misdemeanor punishable under the general penalty provisions of this code. In addition to other lawful remedies, the
eammunity sen,iees dir-eete f public works director or his/her designee is authorized to impose a surcharge for the
first occurrence after a documented warning notice and each subsequent violation in which a customer's water usage
practices exceed water conservation restrictions as provided for in this chapter. Said surcharge will be added to and
become a part of the water bill for the customer in addition to any service rate amounts as set forth in Chapter 7.10
ECC. Prior to the imposition of the first surcharge, a public works division representative shall deliver in person or
post a notice at the service address advising of the customer's water usage practices in excess of mandatory water
shortage restrictions and advising that a surcharge may be imposed for any further violations. A copy of the
violation notice shall also be mailed to the owner and/or occupant. The e w..nunity son.ioes dire for public works
director shall promulgate regulations providing for appeal of any notice of violation. Appeals must be received
within five working days of delivery of notice of violation.
A. Surcharges for violations of water restrictions in effect for the balance of 1990 and until thereafter adjusted shall
be:
$25.00 for first violation;
$50.00 for each violation thereafter.
B. Surcharges for all customer classes will be reviewed annually based on actual or projected expenses of the water
division necessary to maintain a water supply during an emergency. [Ord. 2774 § 3, 1990].
Section 7.10.063 Enforcement.
A. The ublic works director, or his/her designee, including any employee of the city of
Edmonds public works division, or field personnel of the community services department, or police officer of the
city, shall have the authority to enforce the provisions of this chapter.
B. In addition to the surcharges provided in ECC 7.10.062, the lees difeetefpublic works director or
his/her designee is authorized to install a water restricting device on the waterline or lines serving any person who
commits a second or subsequent violation of any of the provisions of this chapter. Alternatively, after such notice of
a violation as may reasonably be given based on the circumstances, the community services directorpublic works
director or his/her designee may cause water service to be terminated for subsequent or continuing violation of water
conservation restrictions. [Ord. 2774 § 4, 1990; Ord. 2214 § 3, 1981; Ord. 1942 § 3, 1977; Ord. 547, 1943; Ord. 413
§ 21A, 1929].
Section 7.10.065 Suspension of service — Failure to comply with sewer connection notice.
A. There exists within the city of Edmonds certain earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas, and other
environmentally sensitive areas in which the discharge of sanitary waste from private septic tanks constitutes a
hazard to the public health, safety and welfare of the city. Such areas may be designated by the city council or by
order of the public works director. The Meadowdale landslide hazard area, as defined and described in documents
on file with the city of Edmonds and available for inspection at the request of any individual, is hereby declared to
be such an area. Failure of any owner or owners of residential or commercial structures located within such a
designated area to connect with available sanitary sewers following notice given in accordance with RCW 35.67.190
is hereby declared to be a public hazard and nuisance.
B. When any owner or owners of property have failed to connect within the period established by written
notification, the eewA .tmio. sen4ees a-i-e-ofDublic works director or his designee shall cause a notification of
shut-off of water service to be delivered to the owners of such properties by registered mail. The notice shall specify
that water service shall be terminated by the city within 10 days of the date of notice unless:
Packet Pg. 236
7.4.a
1. The owner or owners shall cause the property to be connected to the public sewer within such period; or
2. The owner or owners shall apply for a building permit within said 10-day period and connect to the sewer
line, present a written contract or adequate assurance between the owner and a licensed plumber evidencing an
enforceable obligation and intent to connect to such line and provide a bond in an amount sufficient to fulfill
the terms of such agreement in the event that the owner defaults thereon.
C. In the event the owner fails to connect to the sewer line within the 10-day period or to provide the adequate
assurances required by subsection (B)(2) of this section, water service to such residential or commercial structures
and to the property on which they are located shall be discontinued. Service shall not again be instituted until such
time as the owner has connected to the sewer system, paid the actual costs of the city including, but not limited to,
disconnecting, reconnecting, notifying the owner and otherwise taking action with respect to the requirements of this
section. The actual cost thereof may vary, but the city council hereby establishes such reconnection fee to be
$250.00; provided, however, that in the event the actual costs are greater, they may be imposed by written order of
the ^,,...w unit , servi es dir-eetor public works director or his designee and the reconnection shall not be completed
until such time such assessed costs are paid. In the event that the owner or owners believe that the reconnection
charges are in excess of the amount actually incurred or which reasonably may be incurred the city, the owner or
owners may appeal the set fee or additionally designated fee to the hearing examiner in the same manner as if it
were a Type II decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC). [Ord. 3736 § 6, 2009; Ord. 2676 § 1, 1988].
Section 7.20.050 Adoption of state regulations.
The public works director or his/her designee is hereby authorized to develop rules and
regulations based upon and including the requirements of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Health
regarding public water supplies and the protection of such supplies from contamination entitled "Cross -Connection
Control Regulations in Washington State," the provisions of WAC 246-290-490, and the American Waterworks
Association, Pacific Northwest Second Edition of "Accepted Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual."
The provisions of the Washington Administrative Code, the rules and regulations of the Department of Health set
forth in the Cross -Connection Control Regulations in Washington State and the previously referenced Accepted
Procedure and Practice in Cross -Connection Manual are hereby adopted by this reference as fully as if herein set
forth in full. Any additional rules and procedures necessary to implement such regulations shall be developed by the
community services director public works director or his/her designee as appropriate. Such rules and regulations
shall be kept on file along with copies of the above referenced regulations and manuals in the office of the city
engineer of the city of Edmonds. [Ord. 2956 § 1, 1993; Ord. 1711 § 1, 1974].
Chapter 7.30
WATER RATES AND SEWER CHARGES
Sections:
7.30.010 Definitions.
7.30.020 Separate single-family residence meters.
7.30.030 Water rates — Meter installation charges.
7.30.035 Water and sewer utility general facilities charges.
7.30.036 Sewer special connection districts.
7.30.040 Utility charges — Sanitary sewer.
7.30.045 Special connection charge.
7.30.050 Unauthorized use of water.
7.30.060 Severability.
7.30.070 Water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions for low income citizen residents.
7.30.080 Reserved.
Packet Pg. 237
7.4.a
7.30.090 Penalties.
Section 7.30.070 Water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions for low income citizen residents.
A. Definitions. For the purposes of implementing water, sewer and stormwater rate reductions under the provisions
of this section, the following words or phrases shall have the following definitions:
1. "Low income eitizen resident" shall mean a person who has established Edmonds as their residence and
whose total disposable income including that of his or her spouse or cotenant does not exceed the amount
specified in RCW 84.36.381(5)(b) as the same exists or is hereafter amended.
2. The definition of terms such as "residence," "total disposable income," "combined disposable income," and
other such terms used in this section shall be given those meanings established by RCW 84.36.383 as the same
exists or is hereafter amended. In the event that any provision of the Revised Code of Washington incorporated
by reference or implication in this definitional section shall be amended, such amendment shall be deemed to
be incorporated within or utilized in interpretation of this section.
B. Low income ei3 residents shall be given reductions in the water, sewer and stormwater rates as those rates are
established from time to time by the city council:
1. A rate reduction of 30 percent shall be afforded those low income eitizen residents who meet the qualifying
income and asset levels established by RCW 84.36.381(5)(b)(i) as the same exists or shall hereafter be
amended.
2. A 50 percent rate reduction shall be afforded those low income citizens qualifying under the provisions of
RCW 84.36.381 (5)(b)(ii).
3. No rate reduction shall be afforded to any person shown as a dependent on the income tax return of any other
individual, whether or not such person resides at the location for which the rate reduction is sought, unless the
total combined disposable income of the applicant, along with their spouse, cotenant and all family members
shown on the income tax return in which the applicant is shown as a dependent, meets the standards established
by this section.
C. The administrative services director is authorized to establish an application for low income eitize residents rate
reduction applications. The application shall be provided without cost by the utility billing division of the city and
shall include such information as may reasonably be required by the administrative services director to verify
eligibility. [Ord. 3629 § 9, 2007; Ord. 2807 § 1, 1990; Ord. 2805 § 2, 1990; Ord. 2777 § 1, 1990].
Section 7.60.030 Utility assistance fund.
A. Purpose. The city council establishes the utility assistance fund in order to accept, hold and dispense funds
contributed either from the city's general fund, from charitable and civic organizations or from individual
rate -payers who have made donations for the assistance of a category of citizen residents known under Article 8,
Section 7 of the Washington State Constitution as the "poor and infirm" and under other provisions of other state
statutes and local ordinance as the low-income, elderly and disabled.
B. Disbursement. Such monies as are contributed shall be held and disbursed to persons qualifying for the assistance
programs established by ECC 7.30.070 and the provisions of state law incorporated in that section. Disbursements
may be made, to the extent of monies held within the fund, for utility charges, connection fees, and other exactments
levied by the utilities which, taken as whole, constitute the combined utility. The monies may be expended for
purposes which generally benefit the public health, safety and welfare or are designated by the donor of the fund.
Packet Pg. 238
7.4.a
C. The administrative services director or his/her designee is hereby authorized to adopt forms and procedures for
the acceptance of contributions to the fund and for the disbursement of monies from the fund. [Ord. 3393 § 1, 2002]
Section 7.80.030 Services to be provided.
Each waste collector that services the city of Edmonds shall be responsible for making the following recycling
services available to their operation areas within the city:
A. Collection of the following materials from the curb when properly set out on the designated collection day for
collection by the designated hauler:
1. Old newspaper;
2. Mixed waste paper, including old corrugated containers (cardboard);
3. Aluminum food and beverage containers;
4. Tin-plated steel food and beverage containers;
5. Glass food and beverage containers;
6. PETE #1 (polyethylene terephthalate) plastic.
Other recyclable materials, such as plastic or waste oil, may be collected on a continuing basis, at the option of the
city when reasonable costs for including specified additional materials are allocated to residents receiving the added
service.
B. Collection shall be biweekly from each nonmultifamily residence, preferably on the same day as trash collection,
unless the hauler can demonstrate to the city that an alternative collection schedule can result in the same or higher
levels of participation and recovery.
C. Processing and marketing of all materials collected shall be provided, such that no more than 10 percent by
weight of the collected material may be landfilled, unless the county and the WUTC, in recognition of special
circumstances, accept such material.
D. A recycling container to hold the materials designated for collection shall be made available to each
nonmultifamily residence. Other customer classes will work with the haulers to identify container options. Options
should be made available to customers to provide their own containers with a commensurate reduction in rates.
E. Collection of yard waste from nonmultifamily, when fully phased in, shall be made available at least biweekly
from the months of March through November, unless the hauler can demonstrate to the city that an alternative
collection schedule can result in the same or higher levels of participation and recovery.
F. Promotional strategies shall be employed by the haulers to reasonably and regularly inform and notify each
eligible residence of the availability of recyclables collection service and of appropriate actions and schedules for
preparing material for set out.
G. The city shall undertake a public education and awareness program utilizing funds from the Snohomish County
recycling grant. The city shall where possible reinforce the efforts of private even residents and groups to promote
public awareness and environmental consciousness.
H. The hauler shall develop a total rate structure for garbage and recycling which provides economic incentives for
customers to recycle and reduce total waste in accordance with state and county goals. Nonmultifamily customers
shall be charged a single inclusive rate for garbage and recyclables and a separate rate for the collection of yard
waste. Multifamily customers shall be charged the single, all inclusive rate for garbage and recycling service.
Packet Pg. 239
7.4.a
Provisions shall be made by the haulers to give credit to customers who can demonstrate that they do not produce
any recyclables.
I. The city shall adopt administrative policies and procedures which maximize its own recycling of paper and other
potentially recyclable items. Also, where practicable, the city shall attempt to utilize recyclable paper and other
recyclable commodities so as to provide markets for collected recyclables.
J. The haulers shall take measures to reduce all possible costs to Edmonds customers of the collection of recyclables
and yard waste. This shall include, but not be limited to, provisions of small trash containers and a commensurate
reduced rate, provision of alternatives to providing a toter for yard waste (such as allowing customers to use their
own containers), credits for composting. [Ord. 2949 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2901 § 1, 1992].
7.80.050 Reporting of proposed rates.
Prior to seeking rate adjustments from the WUTC, the haulers shall provide the Edmonds city council, through the
eamffmnity ser-vi es dir-eetef public works director, a complete report on the proposed rates and any supporting
documentation which the director might require.
Section 7.200.010 Purpose and intent.
The purposes of this chapter are:
A. To provide for the health, safety, and general welfare of the eitizen residents of the city of Edmonds, Washington,
through the regulation of nonstormwater discharges to the city's municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4), as
well as to all groundwaters and waterbodies, to the maximum extent practicable as required by federal and state law.
B. To establish methods for controlling the introduction of pollutants into the city's MS4 in order to comply with the
requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit process. Specifically:
1. To regulate the contribution of pollutants to the MS4 by stormwater discharges from any user.
2. To prohibit illicit connections and illegal discharges to the MS4, as well as to all groundwaters and
waterbodies.
3. To define the city's legal authority to carry out all inspection, surveillance and monitoring necessary to
effectuate said purposes.
C. To protect and enhance water quality and aquatic wildlife and its habitat by preventing harmful discharges to
local waterbodies. [Ord. 3751 § 2 (Exh. A), 2009; Ord. 3483 § 1, 2003].
Section 8.08.060 Ground for denial — Limited.
No permit shall be denied by the chief of police except upon the following grounds:
A. The desired parade route conflicts with another parade for which a permit has already been issued; or
B. The proposed route would unreasonably prevent or block the provision of emergency services within the city of
Edmonds or would unduly disturb the convenience of the public in the use of the public streets and sidewalks.
In the event that a permit is denied for the reasons shown in subsections A or B of this section, the chief of police
shall work with the applicant in order to find an unencumbered time or date suitable to the applicant and shall
suggest alternate routes which would not unduly prevent or block the provision of services. The requirement of a
Packet Pg. 240
7.4.a
parade permit shall not be used or administered to prevent the exercise of free speech by any individual or group of
individuals so long as the parade route requested is reasonable as to its time, place and manner. It is the policy of the
city of Edmonds to permit, encourage and promote the lawful exercise of free speech by all of its e-ilizeresidents
regardless of the content thereof. [Ord. 2478, 1985].
Section 8.48.610 Contract for towing and storage.
A. The Tina ee dire for administrative services director is authorized to prepare specifications for towing and
storage of vehicles, including instructions to bidders, containing such provisions as the director shall deem advisable
and not in conflict with this chapter. The specifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the budget
director and the approval of the city council by resolution passed for such purpose.
B. In lieu of the individual bidding process authorized under subsection (A) of this section, the city may, at its
discretion, establish a rotational list of contractors to provide towing services. Said alternative process may proceed
either according to contract specifications developed by the director or pursuant to an existing bidding and
contractual arrangement utilized by another municipality with which the city has entered into an interlocal
agreement providing for the reciprocal use of each jurisdiction's bids for services. [Ord. 3564 § 1, 2005].
8.48.611 Contract for towing and storage — Financial responsibility.
Any contract for towing and storage under the provisions of this chapter shall require the contractor to demonstrate
proof of financial responsibility for any liability which the city may have as a result of any negligence, willful
conduct, or breach of contract by the contractor, and for any damage which the owner of an impounded vehicle may
sustain as a result of damage to or loss of the vehicle. Proof of financial responsibility shall be furnished either by
proof of insurance, filing a surety bond and/or by depositing cash in such amounts as the Tina ee dir-eeter-
administrative services director shall determine necessary. [Ord. 3564 § 1, 2005].
Section 9.20.030 Notice of work to be done — Assessment procedures.
A. Resolution of Intent. Whenever the city council of the city wishes to devolve the duty and/or burden and/or
expense of constructing, reconstructing, or repairing a sidewalk, the city attorney, along with the city engineer, shall
prepare a resolution of such intent. The resolution shall include a preliminary assessment roll identifying the
abutting property owners who may be asked to complete and/or be assessed for the cost of said construction,
reconstruction, or repairs. The resolution shall state whether the abutting property owner is to bear the cost of all or a
specific portion of this work. The resolution shall also specify if the owners have the option to complete the work
and the amount of time that the property owners shall have to make the repairs themselves if they chose to do so.
The resolution shall also set forth a specific time and date for a public hearing on the resolution.
B. Publication and Mailing of Resolution (Final). The city clerk shall publish the resolution for two consecutive
weeks and mail copies of the resolution, preliminary assessment roll, and hearing notices to all abutting property
owners affected by the resolution at least 10 days in advance of the hearing. The city clerk shall generate an affidavit
specifying the city clerk's compliance with the afore -referenced publication of the resolution and mailing of hearing
notices, assessment roll, and resolution to abutting owners.
C. Public Hearing. At the scheduled public hearing, the city council should weigh the resolution in light of citizen
resident comments and consider any appropriate changes in the resolution. Property owners may assert as a defense
on limitation an assessment the defenses and/or limitations set forth in ECC 9.20.030(A) and (B) and shall have the
burden of establishing such defense and/or limitation by substantial and competent evidence. Any changes to the
resolution must be effected by passage of a motion.
Packet Pg. 241
7.4.a
D. Construction, Reconstruction, Repair of Sidewalks by Abutting Property Owners. If as a result of the hearing, the
city council determines to proceed with the improvement(s), the affected abutting property owners shall be notified
that they will have up to the time specified in the resolution to complete the repairs. Such notice shall state that in
case such owner shall fail to make said construction and/or reconstruction and/or repair within such time, the city
will proceed to make the same through its comna ,nity seiwiees air-eete public works director, and that said
comniHnioy se fviees air-eet ... public works director will report to the city council, at a subsequent date to be
definitely stated in said notice, and that an amended assessment roll showing the lot or parcel of land directly
abutting on such portion of such street so improved by the director, the cost of such improvement, and the name of
the owner, if known, and that said city council of the city at the time stated in said notice or at the time or times to
which the same may be adjourned shall meet to hear any and all protests against the proposed assessment.
E. Second Survey and Report to City Council. Upon the expiration of the time fixed within which the owner is
required to construct, to reconstruct, or repair such sidewalk, the city engineer shall determine which property
owners have made the necessary repairs, and shall remove their names from the preliminary assessment roll. If the
owner has failed to perform such work, the city may proceed to perform such work, and the
dir-eete public works director of the city performing such work shall, within the time fixed in this notice, report to
the said city council an assessment roll showing the lot or parcel of land directly abutting such portion of such street
so improved, the cost of such work, and the name of the owner, if known.
F. Creation of Sidewalk Construction Fund. The city attorney, along with the city engineer, may prepare an
ordinance creating a sidewalk construction fund to complete the construction, reconstruction, or repairs not
undertaken by the abutting property owners pursuant to the resolution. The ordinance shall include the amended
preliminary assessment roll as an attachment.
G. Construction. Reconstruction or Repair of Remaining Sidewalks. The city engineer will then call for bids to make
repairs to the remaining sidewalks. The city council shall award a contract for the remainder of the repairs and upon
completion of the repairs the city engineer shall prepare the final assessment roll and submit the same to the city
council.
H. Assessments Imposed. The city council of the city shall pass a resolution fixing a date for hearing upon the final
assessment roll.
The resolution shall assess the cost of such improvement against each abutting property owner and shall fix the time
and manner for payment thereof, which said assessment shall become a lien upon said property, and shall be
collected in the manner as is provided by law for collection of special assessments under Chapters 35.68, 35.69, and
35.70 RCW.
The city clerk shall publish the resolution for two consecutive weeks and mail copies of the resolution, preliminary
assessment roll, and hearing notices to all abutting property owners affected by the resolution at least 10 days in
advance of the hearing. The city clerk shall generate an affidavit specifying the city clerk's compliance with the
afore -referenced publication of the resolution and mailing of hearing notices, assessment roll and resolution to
abutting owners. The city council shall either affirm, modify or reject the final assessment roll after said public
hearing. [Ord. 3101 § 1, 1996].
Section 9.20.090 Enforcement responsibility.
The city ,iees air^^'^r public works director shall be charged with the enforcement of this chapter.
[Ord. 3101 § 1, 1946].
Packet Pg. 242
7.4.a
Section 10.16.060 Funds for improvement and maintenance of the cemetery.
A. There are hereby created two special funds of the city to be known as the cemetery improvement fund and the
cemetery maintenance trust fund. Pursuant to RCW 68.52.040, the city council shall, each year as a part of the
budget process, allocate revenue from lot sales, burial fees, and all bequests, gifts and donations received with
respect to the cemetery on a percentage basis to said funds.
1. The cemetery improvement fund was established to provide for the day-to-day operations of the cemetery,
including special events. Expenditures of this fund may be made both from principal and income and the entire
amount of such fund may be expended in any year when such expenditures are within the annual budget
approved by the city council.
2. The cemetery maintenance trust fund shall be held in trust for future expenditure solely for the purpose of
maintaining the cemetery and any capital improvements or facilities located therein in the foreseeable future.
Expenditures from this fund shall be limited to the income earned by said funds along with any additional funds
appropriated to this fund by the council or donated by any party for the purpose of annual maintenance. To the
extent permitted by law, the city council hereby impresses the current fund balance of this fund, as well as any
private donations made in trust in favor of the estate of any person buried therein by the descendants of such
persons, the Hubbard Family Foundation and any other persons or entities donating funds to the cemetery
maintenance trust fund for the sole purpose of maintenance of the cemetery and its capital improvements.
3. The city council shall consider the number of unsold lots, the future market value of unsold lots, and the
probable earnings of the trust fund when fully funded by the sale of all lots when allocating revenue. The goal
Packet Pg. 243
7.4.a
shall be to actuarially fund the cemetery and maintenance fund with sufficient monies so that it may become
and remain a self-sufficient source of funding for all recurring maintenance of the cemetery.
B. Any monies in said funds, surplus and available for investment, shall be managed in accordance with RCW
68.52.060. This section shall be considered approval of investments in accordance with RCW 68.52.065 subject to
the annual review of the city council in the budget process. All investments shall be reviewed and approved by the
finanee diFe administrative services director.
C. Monies shall be paid out of said funds only upon warrants drawn by the city and approved in the manner set forth
in Chapter 2.25 ECC. All warrants shall be endorsed by the mayor and attested by the city fina ee dir-eeter
administrative services director. In no event shall any monies be expended from the cemetery maintenance trust fund
in excess of the annual income earned nor shall any money be diverted from such trust fund to any purpose other
than provided in this chapter. To the extent permitted by law, the council hereby prohibits itself and future councils
from diverting funds for the cemetery maintenance trust fund, while reserving its right to budget monies to or
approve expenditures from the cemetery maintenance trust funding future budget years as it, in its sole discretion,
shall deem appropriate in order to actuarially provide for the establishment of a fund which will generate sufficient
income to meet the future foreseeable maintenance needs of the cemetery. Expenditures of monies from the
cemetery improvement fund and the cemetery maintenance trust fund shall be provided for in the annual budget by
the council subject to the recommendation of the cemetery board. [Ord. 3987 § 1, 2015; Ord. 3797 § 1, 2010; Ord.
2827 § 3, 1991; Ord. 2596, § 1, 1986. Formerly 10.16.050].
Section 10.20.040 Powers and duties.
The commission is empowered to advise and make recommendations to the mayor, city council or other commission
or board of the city on matters including but not limited to those set forth hereinafter. The activities of the
commission shall include the following:
A. To represent the city's interest in art matters and the interest of the arts in city matters and to keep the mayor and
city council informed on all such related matters;
B. To be a central body to whom art organizations, artists and anyone interested in cultural advancement of the
community may come for information or assistance;
C. To encourage and aid programs for cultural enrichment of Edmonds eitizen residents;
D. To coordinate and strengthen existing cultural organizations and to develop cooperation with schools and
regional and national art organizations;
E. To explore ways and implement methods of obtaining financial support through development of private, local,
state and federal funds and establishing public/private partnerships to promote cultural projects within the
community;
F. To review and make recommendations on all art acquisitions, on facilities used for cultural events and other
capital expenditures for cultural projects in the city;
G. To review proposed arts -related projects or events to recommend to the city those which may provide benefit to
the community;
H. To explore and promote arts -related projects, events and businesses which may provide an economic benefit to
the city or which beautify and enhance the image of the city;
I. To engage in long range cultural planning and implementation as well as review city plans for the purpose of
integration of arts elements into city planning including education, public finance, community services, etc.;
J. To establish liaisons and set up mechanisms for communication with city boards and commission and other
organizations as appropriate;
Packet Pg. 244
7.4.a
K. To recognize the contributions made by individuals and organizations to the cultural life of the city;
L. To provide periodic reports to the mayor and council on the progress of the work plan and prepare and submit an
annual report;
M. To render any other advice and assistant in cultural matters, aesthetics, and beautification; and
N. To render any other advice and assistance to the city in any other artistic activities as may be referred to by the
city. [Ord. 3025 § 1, 1995].
Section 10.60.010 Created.
There is hereby created within the city of Edmonds the Edmonds sister city commission, which shall be composed
of not less than nine nor more than 12 interested individuals who will promote relationships with sister cities
approved by the Edmonds city council. Commission members shall be appointed by the mayor with the
confirmation of the city council from a list of candidates proposed by interested citizen residents participating in the
commission's activities as well as names submitted by interested citizen residents. Except for the initial commission,
the term of office of each member shall be for three years. At the date of initial appointment, the mayor shall provide
in his or her appointment for staggered terms in order that no less than two nor more than four members shall be
appointed in each year. The commission shall elect a chairman and provide through its own rules for such additional
officers as it deems appropriate. The commission shall also provide for various subcommittees chaired by members
of the commission and comprised of interested citizen residents throughout the community, governmental bodies
and educational institutions who are interested in various aspects of the commission's purposes.
Section 10.60.020 Meeting.
The Edmonds sister city commission shall meet on the fourth Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. at such locations
as it shall establish throughout the city of Edmonds. The subcommittees of the commission are not city committees
and shall not transact public business, and their meetings shall not be considered public meetings for the purposes of
the Open Meeting and Record Act. Such subcommittees shall make recommendations only to the sister city
commission. This statement of purpose is not intended to avoid any requirement of state law but rather to recognize
that such subcommittees and their membership may shift from time to time, and are groups of interested citizen
residents working together to promote the activities of the commission, subject to its approval.
Section 10.60.030 Formal commission structure.
Only those commission members appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the city council shall be covered by the
city's indemnification ordinance. One purpose of the commission will be to promote its activities through broad
eitizen resident participation; provided, however, that subcommittee members and other eitizea residents
participating in the commission functions shall not be covered by the city's indemnification ordinance nor the city's
liability insurance coverage. Official activities of the sister city commission shall comply with established city
ordinance procedures and accounting procedures.
Section 10.90.020 Composition of the commission.
A. All members of the commission must have a demonstrated interest or competence in historic preservation and
possess qualities of impartiality and broad judgment.
B. The commission shall consist of seven voting members and one nonvoting, ex officio position to be filled by
Edmonds city council members; provided, that if the commission has more than seven voting members at the time
this code is adopted, all members shall remain full voting members until the size of the commission can be reduced
to seven through term expiration or other occurrence of vacancy. The commission shall include at least two
Packet Pg. 245
7.4.a
professionals who have experience in identifying, evaluating, and protecting historic resources and are selected from
among the disciplines of history, architecture, architectural history, historic preservation, planning, cultural
anthropology, archaeology, cultural geography, American studies, law, and/or real estate. Four positions shall be
filled by eifizen residents of Edmonds with demonstrated interest in historic preservation. One position shall be
filled as recommended by the Edmonds South Snohomish County Historical Society. A commission action that
would otherwise be valid shall not be rendered invalid by the temporary vacancy of one or all of the professional
positions, unless the commission action is related to meeting certified local government (CLG) responsibilities cited
in the certification agreement between the mayor and the historic preservation officer. Furthermore, in special
circumstances, exceptions to the residence requirement of commission members may be granted by the mayor and
the city council in order to obtain representatives from those disciplines. [Ord. 4274 § 1 (Exh. A), 2022; Ord. 3870 §
2, 2012; Ord. 3813 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3669 § 2, 2007; Ord. 3526 § 1, 2004; Ord. 3392 § 1, 20021.
Section 10.95.010 Board created — Membership.
A. There is hereby created a citizens' tree board consisting of seven members plus one alternate and one nonvoting,
ex officio position to be filled by an Edmonds city council member. Board members must be Edmonds residents. It
is recommended the board include even residents from throughout the city (representing different watersheds and
neighborhoods). Additionally, those with professional or hobbyist interest/experience in urban forestry, horticulture,
and habitat enviroscaping are preferred; these may include arborists, botanists, horticulturists, native plant experts,
master gardeners, wildlife experts, and related.
B. Each councilmember shall appoint one tree board member to a term the duration of which shall coincide with the
term of the appointing councilmember. Each of the seven tree board positions, numbers one through seven, will be
appointed by the councilmember holding the respective position number, one through seven. The alternate member
shall be appointed by the council president to a term the duration of which shall coincide with the term of the
council president. All appointments must be confirmed by a majority of the full city council. Newly elected
councilmembers may reappoint an existing tree board member or alternate member or may appoint a new member in
the sole discretion of the individual councilmember. Where a councilmember is appointed to fill a vacant council
seat, that councilmember may only appoint a person to the tree board if the tree board position associated with that
council position becomes vacant.
C. There shall be no term limits. Should a vacancy occur on the tree board, a new member shall be appointed by the
council position that previously appointed the vacant position on the tree board for the remainder of the
councilmember's term. [Ord. 4067 § 1 (Att. A), 2017; Ord. 3875 § 1, 2012; Ord. 3807 § 1, 2010].
Section 10.95.030 Powers and duties.
A. The board is empowered to: advise and make recommendations to the mayor and city council and, as appropriate,
to the planning board and other boards or commissions of the city on such matters including but not limited to:
1. An urban forest management program and/or ordinances to help preserve and protect existing trees,
encourage planting of additional trees, safeguard trees on parcels where construction or renovation is occurring
or planned to occur, and encouraging the Edmonds citizenry to become active stewards of the urban forest.
2. Increasing community outreach and education regarding the value of trees, proper selection of trees, and
correct methods for planting of and caring for trees.
3. Working with civic, religious, and citizen resident groups on specific projects or to organize invasive plant
removal and native vegetation planting in accord with the department of parks, recreation and cultural services.
4. Facilitating relevant grant applications supporting ecology and watershed protection projects.
5. Sponsoring an annual Arbor Day event.
6. Working towards achieving and maintaining a Tree City USA® status.
Packet Pg. 246
7.4.a
B. The board shall provide an annual report to the city council within the first quarter of each year. [Ord. 4067 § 1
(Att. A), 2017; Ord. 4034 § 2, 2016; Ord. 3807 § 1, 2010].
Chapter 15.00
PREFACE AND FEES
Sections:
15.00.000
Title.
15.00.010
Purpose.
15.00.020
Application fees.
15.00.030
Repealed.
15.00.040
Duties of officials.
15.00.050
References.
15.00.060
Regulated actions.
15.00.070
Severability.
15.00.000 Title.
ECC Titles 15 through 21 may be referred to as the community development code.
15.00.010 Purpose.
The purpose of the community development code is to assemble in one document, as far as is possible, all the
various land use policies and regulations of the city of Edmonds.
15.00.020 Application fees.
A. This section shall apply to any and all fees charged by the city planning division, public works department,
building division and for park dedication, parking, and variance from undergrounding. Fees [hyperlink to 2023 Fees
Associated with Development] ue f ^" .,,^.. � are -established from time to ti by resolution of the city council.
B. All application fees set according to this section shall be paid before the permit coordinator may accept any
application. Application fees are for city processing services, and are not refundable because an application is denied
or modified. The city council may adopt rules providing for the partial refund of application fees for withdrawn
applications in relation to the number of hours spent by the city staff in reviewing the application. [Ord. 3108 § 1,
1996; Ord. 3023 § 1, 1995; Ord. 2952 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2927 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2882 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2842, 1991; Ord.
2655 § 1, 1988; Ord. 2604 § 1, 1987; Ord. 2549 § 1, 1986; Ord. 2302 §§ 1, 2, 1982; Ord. 2273 § 1, 1982; Ord. 2191
§§ 3, 4, 1981; Ord. 2190 § 1, 1981].
15.00.030 Other fees.
Repealed by Ord. 3108. [Ord. 2498, 1985; Ord. 2252 § 2, 1981; Ord. 2190 § 2, 1981].
15.00.040 Duties of officials.
A Community Development Director -Planning and development director. The community development
director -planning and development director shall administer and enforce the provisions of ECDC Titles 15, 16, 17, 20
and 21, except for those provisions to be enforced by the building official.
B. Building Official. The building official shall enforce and administer the provisions of ECDC Title 19, except for
Chapter 19.75 which shall be enforced and administered by the fire chief, and the provisions of ECDC Titles 15, 16,
17 and 21 which relate to the construction of structures.
C. Public Works Director. The public works director shall administer and enforce the provisions of ECDC Title 18,
and any other provision specifically calling for action by the public works director.
Packet Pg. 247
7.4.a
D. Permit Coordinator. The permit coordinator shall receive applications for all permits required by this code. The
permit coordinator shall issue all permits authorized by this code, but only after determining that all procedural
requirements of this code have been met. Whenever this code refers to the issuance of a permit, or the granting of an
approval, the permit coordinator shall ensure that written evidence of the permit or approval is given to the
applicant, and that a copy is retained in the city files. However, when one project requires more than one permit, to
the extent practically possible, the permit coordinator shall issue one document consolidating all of the approved
permits.
15.00.050 References.
A. Code Sections. Whenever a code section is referred to in this code, such as ECDC 18.75.030, the reference is to a
section of this code unless otherwise specified.
B. Officials. Whenever an official is referred to in this code such as the building official, the reference is to an
official of the city of Edmonds or a designated staff member unless otherwise specified.
C. Departments. Whenever a department or division is referred to in this code, such as the Fire Department, the
reference is to the department or division of the city of Edmonds unless otherwise specified.
D. Adoption by Reference. Whenever a document is proposed to be adopted into this code by reference, the
document th fe eepies shall be filed before the adoption with the city clerk for public use and examination, and
retained permanently after adoption. Compliance with this requirement, and any other requirement of state law may
be stated in the adopting ordinance, but need not be repeated in this code. Any document adopted by reference shall
have the same effect as if the document were set forth in full in this code.
15.00.060 Regulated actions.
Whenever this code applies to a specific act or type of action, the same provisions apply to all later changes, unless
the code specifically provides otherwise. For example, a permit is required to connect to city sewers. This
requirement also applies to any changes, repair or replacement of sewer connection.
15.00.070 Severability.
It is expressly declared that each section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase and word of this
community development code would have been prepared, proposed, adopted, approved, and ratified irrespective of
any declaration of invalidity or unconstitutionality of any part of this code. Therefore, should any part of this code
be declared invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, this declaration shall not affect the validity or constitutionality
of the remaining parts of this code.
Section 16.43.020 Uses
A. Table 16.43-1.
Permitted Uses
BD1
BD1
GFSFCommercial
BD2
BD3
BD4
BD5
Uses
Retail stores or sales
A
A
A
A
A
A
Offices
A
X
A
A
A
A
Legal/law firms
A
X
A
A
A
A
Financial
A
X
A
A
A
A
Advising
A
X
A
A
A
A
Mortgage
A
X
A
A
A
A
Packet Pg. 248
7.4.a
Permitted Uses
BDI
BDI
GFSFBanks
BD2
BD3
BD4
BD5
(without tellers)
A
X
A
A
A
A
Accounting
A
X
A
A
A
A
Counseling
A
X
A
A
A
A
Architecture
A
X
A
A
A
A
Engineering
A
X
A
A
A
A
Advertising
A
X
A
A
A
A
Insurance
A
X
A
A
A
A
Fitness related business (yoga/pilates/gym/fitness club)
A
X
A
A
A
A
Service uses
A
A(2)
A
A
A
A
Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as trailer
sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and
heavy equipment storage, sales or services
X
X
X
X
X
X
Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same
property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant, microbreweries/distilleries or
food service establishment that also provides an on -site retail outlet open to the
public
A
A
A
A
A
A
Automobile sales and service
X
X
A
A
X
X
Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and
nonexplosive cleaning agents
C
X
A
A
A
X
Printing, publishing and binding establishments
C
X
A
A
A
C
Public markets licensed pursuant to provisions in Chapter 4.90 ECC'
A
A
A
A
A
A
Outdoor dining meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.75 ECDC.
B
B
B
B
B
B
Residential
Single-family dwelling
A
X
A
A
A
A
Multiple dwelling unit(s) — see ECDC 16.43.030(B) for further location
standards
A
X
A
A
A
A
Other Uses
Bus stop shelters
A
A
A
A
A
A
Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020
A
A
A
A
A
A
Primary and high schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G)
through(R)
A
X
A
A
A
A
Local public facilities, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050
C
C
C
C
A
C
Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an
adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070
A
A
A
A
A
A
Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use
B
X
B
B
B
B
Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this
zone
B
X
B
B
B
X
Q
Packet Pg. 249
7.4.a
Permitted Uses
BD1
BDI
GFSFCommercial
BD2
BD3
BD4
BD5
parking lots
C
X
C
C
C
X
Wholesale uses
X
X
X
C
X
X
Hotels and motels
A
A
A
A
A
A
Amusement establishments
C
C
C
C
C
C
Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions
C
X
C
C
C
C
Drive-in/through businesses (businesses with drive through facilities)
X
X
C
A
C
X
Laboratories
X
X
C
C
C
X
Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a permitted use
X
X
X
C
X
X
Day-care centers
C
X
C
C
A
C
Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums
X
X
C
C
A
X
Medical uses, e.g.,
A
X
A
A
A
A
Physicians
A
X
A
A
A
A
Dental
A
X
A
A
A
A
Optometrist (without retail)
A
X
A
A
A
A
Physical therapy (without retail)
A
X
A
A
A
A
Counseling
A
X
A
A
A
A
Other similar medical services
A
X
A
A
A
A
Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the
criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033
A
A
A
A
A
A
Zoos and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for
regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033
C
X
C
C
C
A
Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and
drug abusers
X
X
C
C
A
X
Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the
requirements of ECDC 17.100.070
C
C
C
C
C
C
Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use
D
X
D
D
D
D
Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC
X
X
D
D
D
D
A = Permitted primary use
B = Permitted secondary use
C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit
D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit
X = Not permitted
NOTES:
Packet Pg. 250
7.4.a
(1) BD1 Zone GFSF = Ground Floor Designated Street Frontage (first 45 feet measured from public
rights-of-way/sidewalk or parks/plazas) as defined under Edmonds Community Development Code Map 16.43-1:
Designated Street Front for BD Zones. Buildings set back 15 feet or more from the sidewalk shall not be subject to
the BD Zone GFSF requirements.
(2) Services — by appointment uses not providing open door retail/dining/entertainment functions as a primary
component of the business are not allowed within BD 1 GFSF (first 45 feet). Open door businesses, e.g., real estate
offices, banks (with tellers and no drive-throughs), nail and hair salons are allowed.
For conditional uses listed in Table 16.43-1, the use may be permitted if the proposal meets the criteria for
conditional uses found in Chapter 20.05 ECDC, and all of the following criteria are met:
1. Access and Parking. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the sidewalk. Vehicular access shall only be
provided consistent with ECDC 18.80.060. When a curb cut is necessary, it shall be landscaped to be
compatible with the pedestrian streetscape and shall be located and designed to be as unobtrusive as possible.
2. Design and Landscaping. The project shall be designed so that it is oriented to the street and contributes to
the pedestrian streetscape environment. Fences more than four feet in height along street lot lines shall only
be permitted if they are at least 50 percent open, such as a lattice pattern. Blank walls shall be discouraged,
and when unavoidable due to the nature of the use shall be decorated by a combination of at least two of the
following:
a. Architectural features or details;
b. Artwork;
c. Landscaping.
B. Exception to the BD GSFS. The owner of a building in the BD zone may apply for an exception from the
restrictions on offices and medical uses within the designated street front for leasable space meeting all of the
following criteria:
1. The space is less than 500 square feet;
2. The space does not contain direct access to the street or sidewalk;
3. The previous use was a nonconforming use (e.g., not retail); and
4. The space has been vacant for a period of more than six months. [Ord. 4282 § 3 (Exh. B), 2022; Ord. 3955
§ 1 (Att. A), 2014; Ord. 3932 § 6, 2013; Ord. 3918 § 1 (Att. 1), 2013; Ord. 3894 § 4, 2012; Ord. 3700 § 1,
2008].
Section 16.45.010 Uses.
A. Permitted Primary Uses.
1. Single-family dwellings, as regulated in RS-6 zone;
2. Neighborhood -oriented retail stores, retail service uses, excluding uses such as commercial garages, used car
lots, taverns, theaters, auditoriums, undertaking establishments and those uses requiring a conditional use
permit as listed below;
Packet Pg. 251
7.4.a
3. Offices and outpatient clinics, excluding commercial kennels;
4. Dry cleaning stores and laundromats;
5. Small animal hospitals;
6. Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020;
7. Primary and high schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R);
8. Local public facilities designated and sited in the capital improvement plan, subject to the requirements of
ECDC 17.100.050;
9. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the
requirements of ECDC 17.100.070.
B. Permitted Secondary Uses.
1. Limited assembly, repair or fabrication of goods incidental to a permitted or conditional use;
2. Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted or conditional use;
3. One dwelling unit per lot, in the story above the street floor, with a minimum lot area of 6,000 square feet;
4. Commuter parking lots that contain less than 10 designated parking spaces in conjunction with any local
public facility allowed by this section. Any additionally designated parking spaces that increase the total
number of spaces in a commuter parking lot to 10 or more shall subject the entire commuter parking lot to a
conditional use permit as specified in subsection (D)(2) of this section, including commuter parking lots that
are located upon more than one lot as specified in ECDC 21.15.075�-
5. Outdoor dining meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.75 ECDC.
C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
1. Commercial parking lots;
2. Drive-in businesses;
3. Businesses open to the public between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m.;
4. Convenience stores;
5. Local public facilities not planned, designated, or sited in the capital improvement plan, subject to the
requirements of ECDC 17.100.050;
6. Day-care centers;
7. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums;
8. Museums, art galleries, zoos, and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for
regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033;
9. Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers;
10. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC
17.100.070.
D. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
Packet Pg. 252
7.4.a
1. Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted or conditional use;
2. Commuter parking lots with 10 or more designated parking spaces in conjunction with a facility meeting the
criteria listed under subsection (C)(6) through (10) of this section. [Ord. 3353 § 3, 2001; Ord. 3269 § 1, 1999*;
Ord. 3120 § 1, 1996; Ord. 2759 § 1, 1990; Ord. 2660 § 1, 1988; Ord. 2283 § 4, 1982].
*Code reviser's note: Ord. 3269 expired August 13, 2000. For provisions on the outdoor display of merchandise, see Chapter
17.65 ECDC.
Section 16.50.010 Uses.
A. Permitted Primary Uses.
1. Single-family dwellings, as regulated in RS-6 zone;
2. Retail stores, restaurants, offices and service uses, excluding intense uses, such as trailer sales, used car lots
(except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment sales and services;
3. New automobile sales and service;
4. Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents;
5. Printing, publishing and binding establishments;
6. Bus stop shelters;
7. Community -oriented open air markets conducted as an outdoor operation and licensed pursuant to provisions
in the Edmonds City Code;
8. Multiple Dwelling Unit(s). This use may not be located on the ground floor of a structure, except as provided
in ECDC 16.50.020(B);
9. Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020;
10. Primary and high schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R);
11. Local public facilities subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050;
12. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the
requirements of ECDC 17.100.070.
B. Permitted Secondary Uses.
1. Limited assembly, repair or fabrication of goods incidental to a permitted or conditional use;
2. Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted or conditional use;
3. Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility meeting the criteria listed under subsections (C)(11)
through (14) of this section, except that the facility may also be located along a designated transit route in
addition to an arterial or collector street;-.
4. Outdoor dining meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.75 ECDC.
C. Primary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
1. Commercial parking lots;
2. Wholesale uses;
Packet Pg. 253
7.4.a
3. Hotels and motels;
4. Amusement establishments;
5. Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions;
6. Drive-in businesses;
7. Laboratories;
8. Fabrication of light industrial products;
9. Convenience stores;
10. Day-care centers and preschools;
11. Hospitals, convalescent homes, rest homes, and sanitariums;
12. Museums, art galleries, zoos, and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for
regional public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033;
13. Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers;
14. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070.
D. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
1. Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted or conditional use;
2. Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC. [Ord. 3943 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2013; Ord. 3932 § 4, 2013;
Ord. 3894 § 2, 2012; Ord. 3627 § 2, 2007; Ord. 3353 § 4, 2001; Ord. 3269 § 2, 1999*; Ord. 3147 § 1, 1997].
*Code reviser's note: Ord. 3269 expired August 13, 2000. For provisions on the outdoor display of merchandise, see Chapter
17.65 ECDC.
Section 16.55.010 Uses.
A. Permitted Primary Uses.
1. Marine -oriented services;
2. Retail uses which are either marine oriented or pedestrian oriented, excluding drive-in businesses;
3. Petroleum products storage and distribution;
4. Offices, above the ground floor, excluding medical, dental and veterinary clinics;
5. Local public facilities with marine -oriented services or recreation;
6. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the
requirements of ECDC 17.100.070;
7. Hotels.
B. Permitted Secondary Uses.
Packet Pg. 254
7.4.a
1. Off-street parking and loading in connection with a permitted use;
2. Outdoor dining meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.75 ECDC.
C. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
1. Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC;
2. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC
17.100.070. [Ord. 4213 § 1 (Att. A), 2021; Ord. 3353 § 6, 2001; Ord. 2366 § 9, 1983; Ord. 2307, 1982; Ord.
2283 § 6, 1982].
Section 16.60.010 Uses.
A. Permitted Primary Uses.
1. All permitted or conditional uses in any other zone in this title, except as specifically prohibited by
subsection (C) of this section or limited by subsections (B) and (D) of this section
2. Halfway houses
3. Sexually oriented businesses, which shall comply with the location standards set forth in ECDC 16.60.015,
the development regulations set forth in Chapter 17.50 ECDC, and the licensing regulations set forth in Chapter
4.52 ECC.
B. Permitted Secondary Uses.
1. Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use.
2. Indoor storage facilities that either comprise less than 40 percent of a permitted primary use of the building
in which they are located or are in a separate accessory building or buildings comprising less than 40 percent of
the total leasable building space used for the parcel's permitted primary use(s).
3. Outdoor storage areas that are integral to a permitted primary use, such as storage or display areas for
automobile sales, building materials or building supply sales, or garden/nursery sales; provided, that such
outdoor uses are screened from adjacent residential zoning districts;
4. Outdoor dining meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.75 ECDC.
C. Prohibited Uses.
1. Mobile home parks.
2. Storage facilities or outdoor storage areas intended as a primary use, not secondary to a permitted use.
Automobile wrecking yards, junk yards, or businesses primarily devoted to storage or mini storage are
examples of this type of prohibited use.
D. Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
1. Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC. [Ord. 4302 § 1 (Att. A), 2023; Ord. 4078 § 1 (Exh. 1),
2017; Ord. 3981 § 1 (Art. A), 2014; Ord. 3635 § 1, 2007].
Section 16.62.010 Uses.
A. Permitted Primary Uses.
Packet Pg. 255
7.4.a
1. Medical and health care uses including but not limited to hospitals, outpatient clinics, continuing/long-term
care services, hospice services, laboratories, medical research facilities, emergency medical services and offices
of doctors, dentists, physical therapists, and all others related to medical and health care uses;
2. Medical staff facilities and similar uses, including but not limited to educational and meeting facilities and
staff sleeping quarters;
3. Retail sales and services related to medical uses, including but not limited to pharmacies and convenience
stores, gift shops, bookstores, florists, medical and health care equipment sales and restaurants. Only uses
directly related to supplying medical services may be permitted to operate drive -through facilities;
4. Residential uses dependent upon or related to medical care, including but not limited to convalescent care
facilities, nursing homes, retirement homes, group homes for the disabled and overnight accommodations;
5. Day-care facilities;
6. Counseling centers and alcohol and drug treatment facilities;
7. Transit and other transportation -related facilities;
8. Local public facilities, whether or not planned, designated, and sited in the capital improvement plan, subject
to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050;
9. Primary and high schools subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R);
10. Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the
requirements of ECDC 17.100.070.
B. Permitted Secondary Uses.
1. Helicopter pads related to medical use, if approved as part of a master plan and adopted as part of the
comprehensive plan;
2. Facilities for the permanent storage and/or disposal of biomedical, radioactive and other hazardous waste
shall not be permitted; provided, however, that facilities for the treatment or temporary storage of biomedical,
radioactive and other hazardous waste generated within the medical use zone, or by local publicly operated
medical facilities related to the hospital, shall be permitted;
3. Outdoor dining meeting the criteria of Chapter 17.75 ECDC-
C. Secondary Uses Requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
1. Helicopter pads related to medical use. If the location of a helipad is not included as part of an approved
master plan, then a conditional use permit shall be required. In addition to the conditional use permit review
criteria, the development and use of a helipad shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The helipad shall be limited to emergency medical uses only;
b. Noise from the helipad must be minimized using buffering combined with other operational and site
design techniques to minimize the noise impact on surrounding uses;
c. The helipad shall be sited no closer than 75 feet to any right-of-way or property boundary;
d. The hospital district shall take reasonable measures to ensure safety around the helipad, when in use,
and shall comply with all applicable FAA standards and regulations;
e. The helipad should be located in the southern portion of the site in order to mitigate potential noise
impacts of the residential areas to the north;
Packet Pg. 256
7.4.a
2. Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC
17.100.070. [Ord. 3453 § 3, 2003; Ord. 3353 § 7, 2001; Ord. 3118 § 1, 1996].
Section 16.100.030 Uses.
A. Table 16.100.030-1.
Permitted Uses
District 1
Commercial
District 2
Multifamily
Residential Uses
Single-family dwelling
X
X
Multiple dwelling unit(s)
X
A
Housing for low-income elderly and senior housing
X
A
Commercial Uses
Retail stores or sales
A
A
Offices (2nd floor or higher than retail space in the same building)
A
A
Service uses including professional service offices, health clinics
A
A
Retail uses including grocery stores, pharmacy/drug stores and bookstores
A
E
Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as trailer sales, used car lots
(except as part of a new car sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or
services
X
X
Restaurants (excluding drive -through)
A
A
Pubs, taverns or bars
A
X
Outdoor diningmeetin,g the criteria of Chapter 17.75 ECDC.
B
B
Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same property as an art studio,
art gallery, shoe repair, restaurant or food service establishment that also provides an on -site retail
outlet open to the public
A
E
Automobile sales and service
X
X
Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents
C
E
Printing, publishing and binding establishments
C
C
Community -oriented open air markets conducted as an outdoor operation and licensed pursuant to
provisions in the Edmonds City Code
A
A
Bus stop shelters
A
X
Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020
A
E
Local public facilities subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050
C
C
Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use
B
B
Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this zone
B
B
Commercial parking lots
A
C
Wholesale uses
X
X
Hotels and motels
A
A
Packet Pg. 257
7.4.a
Permitted Uses
District 1
Commercial
District 2
Multifamily
Amusement establishments
C
X
Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions
X
X
Drive-in businesses
X
X
Laboratories
X
X
Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a permitted use
X
X
Day-care centers
C
C
Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional
public facilities as defined in ECDC 21.85.033
A
E
Retail stores larger than 12,000 GSF
X
X
Residential treatment facilities for alcoholics and drug abusers
X
X
Light industrial
X
X
Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use
D
D
A = Permitted primary use
B = Permitted secondary use
C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit
D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit
E = Permitted primary use on ground level floor only
X = Not permitted
[Ord. 3760 § 1, 2009].
Packet Pg. 258
7.4.a
16.110.010 Uses.
A. Table 16.110-1.
Permitted Uses
WMU
Commercial Uses
Retail stores or sales
A
Offices
A
Service uses
A
Retail sales requiring intensive outdoor display or storage areas, such as trailer sales, used car lots (except as part of a new car
sales and service dealer), and heavy equipment storage, sales or services
X
Enclosed fabrication or assembly areas associated with and on the same property as an art studio, art gallery, restaurant or food
service establishment that also provides an on -site retail outlet open to the public
A
Automobile sales and service
C
Dry cleaning and laundry plants which use only nonflammable and nonexplosive cleaning agents
A
Printing, publishing and binding establishments
A
Public markets licensed pursuant to provisions in Chapter 4.90 ECC
A
Outdoor dining meetine the criteria of Chanter 17.75 ECDC
B
Residential Uses
Single-family dwelling
C
Multiple dwelling unit(s)
A
Other Uses
Bus stop shelters
A
Churches, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.020
C
Primary and high schools, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050(G) through (R)
C
Local public facilities, subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.050
C
Neighborhood parks, natural open spaces, and community parks with an adopted master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC
17.100.070
A
Off-street parking and loading areas to serve a permitted use
B
Commuter parking lots in conjunction with a facility otherwise permitted in this zone
B
Commercial parking lots
C
Wholesale uses
X
Hotels and motels
A
Amusement establishments
C
Auction businesses, excluding vehicle or livestock auctions
X
Drive-in businesses
C
Laboratories
C
Fabrication of light industrial products not otherwise listed as a permitted use
X
Q
Packet Pg. 259
7.4.a
Permitted Uses
WMU
Day-care centers
A
Hospitals, health clinics, convalescent homes, rest homes, sanitariums
C
Museums and art galleries of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC
21.85.033
A
Zoos and aquariums of primarily local concern that do not meet the criteria for regional public facilities as defined in ECDC
21.85.033
C
Counseling centers and residential treatment facilities for current alcoholics and drug abusers
C
Regional parks and community parks without a master plan subject to the requirements of ECDC 17.100.070
C
Outdoor storage, incidental to a permitted use
D
Aircraft landings as regulated by Chapter 4.80 ECC
X
A = Permitted primary use
B = Permitted secondary use
C = Primary uses requiring a conditional use permit
D = Secondary uses requiring a conditional use permit
X = Not permitted
For conditional uses listed in Table 16.110-1, the use may be permitted if the proposal meets the criteria for
conditional uses found in Chapter 20.05 ECDC, and all of the following criteria are met:
1. Access and Parking. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the sidewalk and/or adjoining commercial
areas.
2. The use shall be landscaped and designed to be compatible with the pedestrian streetscape, as described in
Chapter 22.110 ECDC. [Ord. 3993 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2015].
Section 17.05.020 Reasonable accommodations.
A. Upon the application of a disabled person or individual or entity providing services to the disabled in a residential
facility or other group living arrangement, the eammonit , sefviees direet^r planning and development director or his
designee is hereby authorized to vary, modify, or waive the provisions of the Edmonds Community Development
Code, including the provisions of ECDC Title 19, in order to provide a reasonable accommodation as necessary to
provide to a disabled person's or care provider to the disabled's full enjoyment of a residence.
B. The city's duty to accommodate is an affirmative one, and the community services director planning and
development director is thereby authorized to provide accommodations in a thoughtful and proactive manner.
C. The following review may, at the discretion of the viees air-eete planning and development
director, include eitizen resident input into the administrative process. The eem ff ,,aity sefviees air^^+^r planning
and development director shall provide written notice of the accommodation to the applicant and property owners
within 300 feet of the subject site.
D. When applying this reasonable accommodation process to the Edmonds Community Development Code,
including the State Building Code and other codes adopted pursuant to ECDC Title 19 and Chapter 19.05 ECDC,
the staff shall avoid the stereotypical assumptions regarding the disabled and shall attempt to ascertain the actual
physical and/or mental limitation of the disabled individual in order to craft an accommodation which best suits the
exercise of that individual's rights. [Ord. 3183 §§ 1, 2, 1998; Ord. 3142 § 2, 1997].
Packet Pg. 260
7.4.a
Section 17.05.040 Accommodations personal to the applicant.
The accommodation provided shall be personal to the applicant and shall not run with the land; provided, however,
that a change in a residential structure necessary to accommodate the operation of a residential care provider to the
disabled may be continued by future operations of similar facilities at the site who establish the same use within six
months of the date the prior use by disabled person or residential care provider ceases. The
dir-eete planning and development director may therefore direct that any physical change in the structure which
would otherwise be illegal under the use or bulk requirements of the Community Development Code be brought into
compliance six months after the date of sale or transfer of a residential structure to a person or entity not qualifying
for the protections of the ADA, FHA and WLAD. [Ord. 3183 § 2, 1998; Ord. 3142 § 2, 1997].
Section 17.05.050 Appeal.
There shall be no appeal from the decision of the een ff. trait , se f iees dir-ee«^ planning and development director
within the city. Interested persons, that is persons located within 300 feet of the building site, may appeal the
reasonable accommodation by filing a petition for review with Snohomish County Superior Court within 10 days of
the date of mailing of the written notice of decision. [Ord. 3183 § 2, 1998; Ord. 3142 § 2, 1997].
Section 17.10.000 Bond required.
A. Site Improvement Bond. Before the eemaitmity development dire^ planning and development director
approves the issuance of a building permit, or occupancy permit, for a change of use for any proposal for which the
city council, a city board or commission, or a city department has required site improvements, the developer or
owner of the property involved shall provide the eemn..,,..:«y development a; .o^« planning and development
director with a performance bond, or similar security, to ensure that the required site improvements are completed
before the building is occupied or the use begins. The bond shall be based on the full cost of all required site
improvements, including drainage and landscaping.
B. Maintenance Bond. Before the ^^.,,ri.,,nity development air^^«^r planning and development director approves
release of a site improvement bond, the developer or owner shall provide a bond, or similar security, for 15 percent
of the amount of the site improvement bond to ensure the maintenance of the site improvements for two years after
the site improvement bond is released.
C. Release of Bond. The cone ,,,nity development dire planning and development director shall release the site
improvement bond only after every affected city department has stated in writing that the site improvements are
complete and satisfactory, and the developer or owner has provided the required maintenance bond.
D. Other Bonds. When other bonds are required, as for a subdivision, they shall be provided to the eammunity�
development air-eete planning and development director. When a proposal involves more than one bond, all bonds
shall be provided before any work or occupancy begins. No bonds shall be released by the ^^.-.amity development
date planning and development director until work covered by all bonds has been satisfactorily completed.
E. Bond Procedure. The community development dire^«^r planning and development director shall adopt rules for
bond amount determination, time limits, alternate acceptable securities, release of portions of bonds on completion
of phases of work, additional bond amounts for extensions of time, and related matters. The Community
development air-eete planning and development director may refer matters under the scope of this chapter to the
appropriate department or division of the city for processing, approval, retainage and release.
Packet Pg. 261
7.4.a
Chapter 17.30
FENCES*
Sections:
17.30.000 General.
17.30.010 Special height restrictions.
17.30.035 Trellises and arbors.
*Code reviser's note: See Error , n nn n7nm) and Chapter 15.00 ECDC 15.00.020 for fence permit fees.
17.30.000 General.
A. A fence permit shall be required for any fence over three feet in height which is also within 10 feet of any street
right-of-way or access easement or within 30 feet of any corner. Height shall be measured from the top of the fence
to the lowest original grade.
B. A fence permit shall be required for any fence within a critical area or its buffer.
C. Unless a variance is first obtained, no fence shall be more than six feet in height as measured from the top of the
fence to the lowest original grade.
D. When a retaining wall three feet in height or greater is contiguous to and below a proposed fence, the proposed
fence may be constructed for the purposes of safety not greater than four feet above the top of the retaining wall or
the finished grade, whichever is less, without the necessity for a variance. [Ord. 3491 § 3, 2004; Ord. 2954 § 1,
1993; Ord. 2772 § 1, 19901.
17.30.010 Special height restrictions.
A. Streets and Corners. Height shall normally be limited to three feet within 10 feet of any street right-of-way or
access easement or 30 feet of any corner, unless an exception is approved.
B. Exception. If the city engineer finds that no hazard to users of the street or to nearby property will be created, the
city engineer may approve a fence of up to six feet in height.
C. Hazard. No fence or other obstruction may be constructed or maintained if it creates a hazard to users of the street
or nearby property (ECDC 18.85.060). [Ord. 3491 § 4, 2004; Ord. 2954 § 1, 1993].
17.30.035 Trellises and arbors.
A. Definitions. As used in this section, the referenced terms shall have the following definitions:
1. "Arbor" is a separate freestanding or attached structure that has a lattice roof and lattice walls or a horizontal
lattice work structure serving to roof a gate or entrance way.
2. "Lattice" and/or "lattice work" is a framework of cross wood or metal strips or a predominantly open
framework of wood or metal designed for decorative purposes or landscaping purposes.
3. "Predominantly open" refers to a lattice work or similar decorative pattern which is designed to permit the
free flow of light and air through the framework and which is designed primarily for decorative rather than
privacy or security purposes.
4. "Trellis" is a horizontal structure of open lattice work designed and intended to support the growth of vines
or other vegetation or a horizontal decorative element composed of lattice work which admits light and air
through a predominantly open design.
B. For the purposes of regulation under the Edmonds Community Development Code trellises shall be considered to
be a fence or a part of a fence. As such, trellises shall be subject to the same height limitations as fences and permits
shall be required to be obtained under the same circumstances as a fence. A trellis which has a horizontal element
which is more than 36 inches in width measured perpendicular to the fence or trellis shall be considered an arbor and
subject to the siting requirements for an arbor.
Packet Pg. 262
7.4.a
C. In addition to the height limits imposed by ECDC 17.30.000(C), the following additions to a fence may be
constructed without a variance:
1. A trellis up to two additional feet in height to a maximum of eight feet may be added as a decorative element
to a fence so long as the combined length of the trellis(es) constructed facing a property line do not exceed 25
percent of the total length of that property line.
2. A trellis up to two additional feet in height to a maximum of eight feet may be added as a decorative element
to a fence facing a street, alley or access easement so long as the trellis remains free of any plantings,
vegetation or other visual obstruction.
3. An arbor up to three additional feet in height to a nine -foot maximum may be constructed over a gate,
walkway or entrance. [Ord. 3348 § 1, 2001].
Packet Pg. 263
7.4.a
Section 17.50.020 Parking space requirements.
[Refer to ECDC 17.50.010(C) and 17.50.070 for standards relating to the downtown business area.]
A. Residential.
1. Single-family and multifamily.
a. Single-family dwellings: two spaces per dwelling unit, except:
b. Multiple residential according to the following table:
Type of multiple dwelling
unit
Required parking spaces per
dwelling unit
Studio
1.2
1 bedroom
1.5
2 bedrooms
1.8
3 or more bedrooms
2.0
2. Boarding house: one space per bed.
3. Rest home, nursing home, convalescent home, residential social welfare facilities: one space per three beds
4. Single-family dwellings with accessory dwelling unit: three spaces total.
B. Business.
1. Retail stores, including art galleries, convenience stores, department stores, discount stores, drug stores,
grocery stores, supermarkets: one space per 300 square feet;
2. Furniture, appliances, and hardware stores: one space per 600 square feet;
3. Services uses, including barber shops, beauty shops, dry cleaners, laundries, repair shops: one space per 600
square feet;
4. Medical, dental and veterinarian offices, banks and clinics: one space per 200 square feet;
5. Business and professional offices with on -site customer service: one space per 400 square feet;
6. Offices not providing on -site customer service: one space per 800 square feet;
7. Bowling alley: four spaces per bowling lane;
8. Commercial recreation: one space per 500 square feet, or one space for each customer allowed by the
maximum permitted occupant load;
9. Car repair, commercial garage: one space per 200 square feet;
10. Drive-in restaurants, automobile service station, car dealer, used car lot: one space per 500 square feet of lot
area;
11. Restaurant, tavern, cocktail lounge: if less than 4,000 square feet floor area, one per 200 square feet gross
floor area; if over 4,000 square feet floor area, 20 plus one per 100 square feet gross floor area in excess of
4,000 square feet;
12. Plant nurseries (outdoor retail area): one space per five square feet of outdoor retail area;
Packet Pg. 264
7.4.a
13. Motels and hotels: one space per room or unit;
14. Retail warehouse, building materials yard: one space per 1,000 square feet of lot area or one per three
employees;
15. Manufacturing, laboratories, printing, research, automobile wrecking yards, kennels: one space per two
employees on largest shift;
16. Mortuary: one space per four fixed seats or per 400 square feet of assembly area, whichever is greater;
17. Marina: to be determined by the hearing examiner, using information provided by the applicant, and the
following criteria:
a. The type of storage facility (moorage, dry storage, trailer parking) and intended use (sailboats, fishing
boats, leisure boats),
b. The need to accommodate overflow peak parking demand from other uses accessory to the marina,
c. The availability and use of public transit;
18. Storage warehouse: one space per employee;
19. Wholesale warehouse: one space per employee;
20. Adult retail store: one space per 300 square feet;
21. Sexually oriented business (except adult retail store): one space for each customer allowed by the maximum
permitted occupant load.
C. Community Facilities.
1. Outdoor places of public assembly, including stadiums and arenas: one space per eight fixed seats, or per 100
square feet of assembly area, whichever is greater;
2. Theaters: one space per five seats;
3. Indoor places of public assembly, including churches, auditoriums: one space per four seats or one space per
40 square feet of assembly area, whichever is greater;
4. Elementary schools, junior high schools, boar -ding schools (elementary through senior high), residential
colleges and universities: six spaces per classroom, or one space per daytime employee, whiehever is
greateriPrimary and Secondary Schools: See ECDC 17.100.050(M) for parking standards relating to primary
and secondary schools;
5. Residential colleges and universities: six spaces per classroom, or one space per daytime employee,
whichever is greater;
6 -5. Nonresidential colleges and universities: one space per daytime employee;
0 spae0 0
r- daytime employee;
7. Museums, libraries, art galleries: one space per 250 square feet;
8. Day-care centers and preschools: one space per 300 square feet, or one per employee, plus one per five
students, whichever is larger;
9. Hospitals: three spaces per bed;
10. Maintenance yard (public or public utility): one space per two employees.
Packet Pg. 265
7.4.a
D. Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure Parking Standards. See Chapter 17.115 ECDC for parking
standards relating to electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure. [Ord. 4251 § 2 (Exh. A), 2022; Ord. 3496 § 2,
2004].
17.50.030 Calculations.
A. Square Feet. Unless otherwise specified, square feet refers to the gross building square footage, including outdoor
areas used for the same use. (s eh as an utdoor eatine afea for- a o.,tauf .`
B. Combination of Uses. Combination of uses shall meet the requirement based on the sum of all the uses reduced
by any applicable joint use provisions (see ECDC 17.50.060). Examples of such combined uses are: a furniture store
with a retail display area and attached storage warehouse, a storage warehouse with attached office, a church with a
parochial school, mixed use building with commercial and residential uses and so forth.
C. Different Uses on Same Site. The requirement for different uses on the same site shall be the sum of all
requirements for the individual uses, reduced by any applicable joint use provisions.
D. Uses Not Specified. Any use not listed above shall meet the requirements of the most similar listed use as
determined by the com-^tm:ty development diree*^r planning and development director.
E. Fractions. When the requirements of this chapter result in a fractional number of parking spaces, one space shall
be provided for a fraction of one-half or more, and no space shall be required for a fraction of less than one-half.
[Ord. 3496 § 2, 2004].
Section 17.50.070 Downtown business area parking requirements.
A. See ECDC 17.50.010(C) for the parking requirements in the downtown business area.
B. Downtown Business Area Defined. The downtown business area consists of all land zoned BC, BD or CW and
located in the area east of Puget Sound, south of Emends Daley Street, west of Seventh Avenue, and north of Pine
Street. For the purposes of this chapter only, the downtown business area shall include all commercially zoned
properties within the specified boundaries.
C. Exceptions to the required parking standards in the downtown area. When requested by the developer, the staff,
using information provided by the applicant, may decrease the required parking for a building listed on the Edmonds
register of historic places in order to retain historic elements of the building during its expansion, remodeling or
restoration. Any building construction or remodeling activities serving as the justification for the parking exception
shall be consistent with the criteria and procedures governing historic buildings contained in Chapter 20.45 ECDC.
The decision on the parking exception shall be processed as a Type II decision. [Ord. 3736 § 15, 2009; Ord. 3628 §
2, 2007; Ord. 3496 § 2, 2004].
Section 17.50.090 Temporary parking lots.
A. Conditional Use. A conditional use permit shall be required in order to construct or maintain a temporary parking
lot in any B (business) or C (commercial) zone. The initial permit shall be valid for a term of one year; provided,
however, that extensions may be approved under the following conditions:
1. The applicant may apply to the eemff.,.aiyy sen4ees dir-eetar- planning and development director to have said
permit extended for a period of one year upon the filing of a written application stating the reasons for said
requests prior to the expiration of the original permit.
2. The applicant may, in addition, apply for an additional two-year extension through the vehicle of a
conditional use permit for a temporary parking lot. In addition to satisfying the criteria of ECDC 20.05.010, the
applicant shall be required to demonstrate that a public benefit will result from the issuance of the two-year
Packet Pg. 266
7.4.a
extension. In no event shall a temporary parking lot be permitted to continue beyond four years from the date
the initial conditional use permit is granted.
3. Applications for a conditional use permit, or an appeal of a staff decision approving or denying a one-year
extension thereof, shall be reviewed by the hearing examiner under the same terms and conditions as any conditional
use permit utilizing the criteria contained in Chapter 20.05 ECDC and under the procedural requirements contained
in Chapter 20.06 ECDC. An application for a two-year extension shall be processed in the same manner as an initial
application for a conditional use permit for a temporary parking lot and new or changed conditions may be imposed
in the course of that process.
B. Improvements. The hearing examiner shall require the applicant to meet the public improvement and dedication
requirements for permanent use of the director of community services. The applicant shall also be required to
provide a durable, well -drained, dust -free and hard surface for the parking lot.
C. Review by the Architectural Design Board. If the conditional use permit is approved, the applicant shall then
submit the proposal for review to the architectural design board, and shall comply with any requirements of the
board as to signage, lighting, screening and landscaping. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to prohibit an applicant
from filing a simultaneous request for review of his conditional use permit application by the hearing examiner
and/or review of said lot by the architectural design board. [Ord. 3783 § 3, 2010; Ord. 3775 § 3, 2010; Ord. 3736 §
16, 2009; Ord. 3496 § 2, 2004].
Section 17.70.000 Security units.
A. Definition. A "security unit" is a building, mobile home, trailer, or vehicle used temporarily in connection with
providing security during construction of a structure or building for which a valid building permit has been issued.
B. Conditions. A security unit is permitted in all zones under the following conditions:
1. All sanitation facilities and safety measures shall be approved in advance by the building official, health
official and other appropriate city officials.
2. Unless earlier directed by the building official pursuant to subsection (13)(3) of this section, security units in
the following zones shall be removed after the following time periods:
a. In an RS zone, one year;
b. All other zones, one year, with a one-year extension if the ^ mm twit.. development dir-eeplanning
and development director finds that the project is large enough to require the longer period, disregarding
any self-imposed delay.
3. The building official may order the removal of a security unit if any of the following situations occur:
a. The building permit expires or is cancelled.
b. The building official issues an occupancy permit.
c. The building official determines that the security structure is no longer needed to provide protection
against theft or vandalism. [Ord. 3742 § 1, 2009].
Section 17.115.020 Definitions.
A. "Battery charging station" means an electrical component assembly or cluster of component assemblies designed
specifically to charge batteries within electric vehicles, which meet or exceed any standards, codes, and regulations
set forth by Chapter 19.28 RCW and RCW 19.27.540.
Packet Pg. 267
7.4.a
B. "Battery exchange station" means a facility that will enable an electric vehicle with a swappable battery to enter a
drive lane and exchange the depleted battery with a fully charged battery, which meets or exceeds any standards,
codes, and regulations set forth by Chapter 19.27 RCW and RCW 19.27.540.
C. "Charging level" means the standardized indicators of electrical force, or voltage, at which an electric vehicle's
battery is recharged. Levels I, II, and III are defined by the electrical output, per the following specifications:
1. Level 1. Considered slow charging and operates on a 15 to 20 amp breaker on a 120 volt AC circuit.
2. Level II. Considered medium charging and operates on a 40 to 100 amp breaker on a 208 or 240 volt AC
circuit.
3. Level 111. Considered fast or rapid charging and operates on a 60 amp or higher breaker on a 480 volt or
higher three-phase circuit with special grounding equipment.
D. "Designated accessible parking space" means an accessible parking space required by WAC 51-50-005 and
designated for the exclusive use of parking vehicles with a state disabled parking permit.
E. "Electric vehicle" or "EV" means any vehicle that operates, either partially or exclusively, on electrical energy
from the grid, or an off -board source, that is stored on board for motive purpose.
F. "Electric vehicle capable" or "EV capable" means a parking space that has listed an install panel capacity and
conduit (raceway) and electrical capacity (breaker space) allocated to accommodate the future build -out of an
electric vehicle charging station with Level II or Level III charging circuits.
G. "Electric vehicle charging station" means a public or private parking space that is served by EV ready or EV
installed forms of electric vehicle charging infrastructure that has as its primary purpose the transfer of electric
energy (by conductive or inductive means) to a battery or other energy storage device in an electric vehicle.
H. "Electric vehicle charging infrastructure" means structures, machinery, and equipment necessary and integral to
support an electric vehicle, including but not limited to battery charging stations, rapid charging stations, and battery
exchange stations.
1. "Electric vehicle installed" or "EV installed" means a fully installed electric vehicle charging station for Level II
or Level III charging levels.
J. "Electric vehicle parking space" means any marked parking space that identifies the use to be exclusively for the
parking of an electric vehicle.
K. "Electric vehicle ready" or "EV ready" means a parking space that is designed and constructed to include a fully
wired circuit with a Level II or Level III electric vehicle charging receptacle outlet or termination point, including
conduit and wiring and the electrical service capacity necessary to serve the receptable, that allows for future
installation of an electrical vehicle charging station.
L. Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment or EVSE. See "Electric vehicle charging station."
M. Nonresidential Use. For the purposes of this chapter, a "nonresidential use" means any primary use that is not a
residential use such as, but not limited to, business uses, commercial uses, industrial uses, or public facility uses.
N. "Rapid charging station" means a Level III electric vehicle charging station that allows for faster recharging of
electric vehicle batteries through higher power levels.
O. Substantial Damage. For the purposes of this chapter, "substantial damage" means damage of any origin
sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before -damaged condition would equal or
exceed 50 percent of the replacement cost of the structure before the damage occurred.
P. Substantial Improvement. For the purposes of this chapter, "substantial improvement" means any reconstruction,
rehabilitation, addition, or other improvement of a primary structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent
Packet Pg. 268
7.4.a
of the market value of the primary structure before the "start of construction" of the improvement. [Ord. 4251 § 1
(Exh. A), 2022].
Fijzure 17.115-1: Electric Vehicle Charging Capacities
oC=) 0
-----
EV Capable
Install electrical panel capacity with
a dedicated branch circuit and a
continuous raceway from the panel
to the future EV parking spot
000
EV Ready
Install electrical panel capacity and
raceway with conduit to terminate in a
function box or 240 volt charging outlet
)typical clothing dryer outlet).
MEN
EV Installed
Install a minimum number of
Level 2 EV charging stations
Section 18.00.010 Application.
A. Forms and Fees. The public works department shall provide application forms. Application fees and other fees
shall be as set in Chapter- 15.00 ECDC 15.00.020.
B. Required Information. The applicant shall provide the following information:
1. Applicant's name and address;
2. Owner's name, address and written consent if the applicant is not the owner;
3. The location, by address and legal description, of the site;
4. A site plan, to scale, showing existing and proposed structures, improvements and affected streets, utilities,
vegetation, LID elements, etc.;
5. The applicant shall clearly specify on the plans, in a separate written statement, how the proposed
development meets the requirements of this title;
6. Further information required by the portion of the community development code that governs the type of
application;
7. Further information required by general rules adopted by the public works director and information required
by the public works director to properly review an individual application;
8. A release of the city from all damages arising from any action or inaction of the city based on false,
misleading or incomplete information furnished by the applicant;
9. Permission to city staff to inspect the property involved to determine whether the application should be
approved.
C. Decision. The public works director or his designee shall decide whether to approve, conditionally approve, or
deny the application, based on staff analysis and comments from other departments. The decision shall be in writing,
and unless another appeal procedure is specifically identified in the provisions of this title, shall be appealable to the
hearing examiner pursuant to Chapter 20.06 ECDC as a Type II decision. Notice of the hearing shall be provided to
Packet Pg. 269
7.4.a
the applicant and/or appellant and any other party who has requested notice in writing or provided written notice
during the application process. Such notice shall be provided in writing at least five (5) business days prior to the
hearing. No application may be approved that conflicts with any portion of the Community Development Code
unless that portion is specifically subject to waiver or variance. [Ord. 4085 § 5 (Exh. A), 2017; Ord. 3788 § 1, 2010]
Section 18.05.000 Scope.
A. This chapter shall be interpreted to require all new or extended utilities to be underground, except when
exempted by this section.
1. "Utilities" shall mean all equipment used to deliver services by a utility such as electricity, telephone or
cable television.
2. "Common utilities" shall mean utilities which serve more than one lot or commercial development.
3. "Private utility services" shall mean the utilities which connect a lot or commercial development with
common utilities.
4. "Utility" shall mean the person, agency, corporation or other organization providing utility service.
5. "Existing utility use" shall mean the existing utility service as judged in three categories: number of poles,
number of lines and height of poles within the project area for which the permit is sought.
6. "New or extended utilities" shall mean only utilities which are being built or extended to serve a new
commercial, industrial, or multifamily residential development which has not had that type of utility service, or
to serve a new single-family residential subdivision.
a. This definition shall not include:
i. Temporary extensions of service for construction purposes;
ii. Additions to any existing aboveground utility system where such additions are not for the purpose of
serving new commercial development or a single-family residential subdivision; nor
iii. Rebuilding or replacing existing common utilities; provided, that the rebuilt or replaced structures
do not expand the existing utility's use within the project area by 10 percent, except as provided in
Chapter 20.50 ECDC for wireless facilities. "Expansion" shall include the number and height of poles,
as well as the number of wires or cable carried thereon.
b. All utility services sought to be constructed as temporary services, additions or rebuilt or replaced
service shall be reviewed prior to issuance of a permit by the ^,.ri,mianity setwi es dire ter- public works
director. Any utility service found to be a "new or extended" service or an "expanded" service shall be
reviewed as herein provided.
7. "Multifamily residential" shall mean development intended for use as apartments, duplexes, condominiums,
or planned residential development.
8. "Project area" shall mean the actual area in which the project is proposed and shall include all structures or
facilities actually, physically impacted by the improvement as well as any necessary appurtenant or accessory
structures.
B. Exemptions. The following are exempt from the underground requirement of ECDC 18.05.010, but are still
subject to the design standards of ECDC 18.05.030:
1. Electric utility substations, padmounted transformers and switching facilities;
2. Electrical utilities of more than 55 kilovolts;
Packet Pg. 270
7.4.a
3. Communication utilities not located on or along a public street right-of-way or private access easement;
4. Street light poles;
5. Telephone pedestals and similar devices;
6. Police and fire sirens, traffic -control devices and other similar municipal equipment;
7. Communication antennas which meet current FCC requirements, if any. [Ord. 3845 § 3, 2011; Ord. 3580 § 1,
2006; Ord. 2491, 1985].
18.05.040 Variances.*
Applications for variances from the underground requirements of this chapter shall be reviewed by the eommunity
setwiees dire public works director as a Type II development project permit application (see Chapter 20.01
ECDC). For the purposes of this chapter, the special circumstances necessary to justify a variance from the
undergrounding provisions of this chapter shall be limited to technological impracticability of any required
underground installation or to a finding that the cost of the underground installation is excessive in light of the
benefits derived and outweighs the benefits to be gained by the public. [Ord. 3736 § 25, 2009; Ord. 2498, 1985; Ord.
2491, 19851.
*Code reviser's note: Variance fee for underground wiring shall be as set in Qk ~ '�WECDC 15.00.020.
Section 18.10.010 Sewer connections.
A. When Required. The owner of any building within 200 feet of any trunk or lateral sewer must connect to the
sewer within 60 days of acquiring the property and must pay to the city a connection fee as set forth in Cyr
15.00 ECDC 15.00.020. All connection fees shall be paid to the city before connecting to the sewer.
B. Future Connection. The owners of any house or home not within 200 feet of any trunk or lateral sewer within the
city must connect to the sewer within 60 days of the completion of any future trunk or lateral sewer upon which the
homeowner may then abut or be within 200 feet, as required by the regulations set forth in this chapter. Any owner
or owners who become subject to these regulations and charges as a result of a latecomer agreement shall be
required to connect for a period of two years after the acceptance date by the city council of the sewer subject to
such agreement.
C. Restriction of Water Service. If a property owner or owners within an area served by sewerage systems of the
city, including those property owners on streets and alleys within 200 feet along which sanitary sewers have been
constructed, have not connected their private sanitary drain and sewers with the city system, the city may restrict
water service to the property to the minimum necessary to insure health and safety of the inhabitants, or where a
health hazard exists or is threatened the city may shut off the city water supply to the premises.
D. Connection. The city council may order connection to the sewer, and the director of public works shall report to
the city council as soon as possible, an assessment roll showing the description of the property connected, and the
cost of each connection.
E. Hearing. The city clerk shall notify the owner of each property in the same manner as notice is provided in a local
improvement district of each proposed assessment. The city council shall hold a hearing under the procedures
applicable to a Type V legislative process. The city council shall, by ordinance after the hearing, assess the cost of
making the connection against the property connected. The assessment shall become a lien against each property,
shall be collected in the manner provided by law for the collection of local improvement assessments, and shall bear
interest at the rate of interest established by ordinance from the date of the approval of the assessment.
F. Permit Required. It shall be unlawful for any person to make any sort of connection to the city sewer line without
a permit from the public works director. [Ord. 3788 § 2, 2010].
Packet Pg. 271
7.4.a
Section 18.20.040 Permits.
A. Required. No person shall construct, install or modify sewage disposal systems without a current city permit. The
permit shall be posted on the building or premises where the work permitted is being done, and unless revoked, shall
not be removed until such work has been finally approved by the public works director.
B. Fee. The fee for a sewage disposal system permit shall be as set in GhapteF 15.00 ECDC 15.00.020.
C. Approval Criteria. The public works director shall only approve an application if in his judgment the physical
features of property on which it is proposed to locate the sewage disposal system, or the design of the proposed
sewage disposal system, are adequate for sale and effective operation of the system.
D. Additional Materials. Application for a sewage disposal system permit shall be supported by the following:
1. A completely dimensioned plot plan, drawn to scale, showing direction of surface drainage, approximate
slope, and other topographical features relevant to the design and installation of an adequate and efficient
sewage disposal system;
2. Construction plans and specifications;
3. A log of soil formation and ground water level as determined by test holes in the proposed disposal field;
4. A statement of absorption characteristics of the soil as determined by percolation tests made in the proposed
disposal field.
E. Term. Permits shall expire one year from date of issue.
Section 18.30.010 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
"Adjustment" means a variation in the application of a minimum requirement to a particular project. Adjustments
provide substantially equivalent environmental protection.
"Applicant" means the owning individual(s) or corporations or their representatives applying for the permits or
approvals described in this chapter.
"Approval" means the proposed work or completed work conforming to this chapter as approved by the public
works director or their designee.
"Arterial" means a road or street primarily for through traffic. The term generally includes roads or streets
considered collectors. It does not include local access roads which are generally limited to providing access to
abutting property. See also RCW 35.78.010, 36.86.070, and 47.05.021.
"Best management practices (BMPs)" means the schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance
procedures, and structural and/or managerial practices approved by the city that, when used singly or in
combination, prevent or reduce the release of pollutants and other adverse impacts to waters of Washington State.
"Bioretention BMPs" means engineered facilities that treat stormwater by passing it through a specified soil profile,
and either retain or detain the treated stormwater for flow attenuation. Refer to the 2019 Stormwater Management
Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW), Volume V for bioretention BMP types and design specifications.
"Category 1 Project Site" means a project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.1 through No. 5. See ECDC
18.30.060(C).
Packet Pg. 272
7.4.a
"Category 2 Project Site" means a project site subject to Minimum Requirements No.1 through No. 9. See ECDC
18.30.060(C).
"Certified erosion and sediment control lead (CESCL)" means an individual who has current certification through an
approved erosion and sediment control training program that meets the minimum training standards established by
Ecology (see BMP C160 in the SWMMWW). A CESCL is knowledgeable in the principles and practices of erosion
and sediment control. The CESCL must have the skills to assess site conditions and construction activities that could
impact the quality of stormwater and the effectiveness of erosion and sediment control measures used to control the
quality of stormwater discharges. Certification is obtained through an Ecology -approved erosion and sediment
control course. Course listings are provided online at Ecology's website.
"Ci's municipal separate storm sewer system" or "MS4" means a conveyance or system of conveyances (including
roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, or storm
drains) that are owned or operated by the city of Edmonds, designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater,
and are not a combined sewer nor part of a publicly owned treatment works as defined in 40 CFR 122.2, and which
is defined as "large" or "medium" or "small" or otherwise designated by Ecology pursuant to 40 CFR 122.26.
"Clearing" means the destruction and removal of vegetation by manual, mechanical, or chemical methods.
"Commercial agriculture" means those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2) and activities
involved in the production of crops or livestock for commercial trade. An activity ceases to be considered
commercial agriculture when the area on which it is conducted is proposed for conversion to a nonagricultural use or
has lain idle for more than five years, unless the idle land is registered in a federal or state soils conservation
program, or unless the activity is maintenance of irrigation ditches, laterals, canals, or drainage ditches related to an
existing and ongoing agricultural activity.
"Common plan of development or sale" means a site where multiple separate and distinct construction activities
may be taking place at different times on different schedules and/or by different contractors, but are still under a
single plan. Examples include: (1) phase projects and projects with multiple filings or lots, even if the separate
phases or filings/lots will be constructed under separate contract or by separate owners (e.g., a development where
lots are sold to separate builders); (2) a development plan that may be phased over multiple years, but is still under a
consistent plan for long-term development; (3) projects in a contiguous area that may be unrelated but still under the
same contract, such as construction of a building extension and a new parking lot at the same facility; and (4) linear
projects such as roads, pipelines, or utilities. If the project is part of a common plan of development or sale, the
disturbed area of the entire plan must be used in determining permit requirements.
"Converted vegetation (areas)" means the change in land cover from native vegetation, pasture scrub/shrub, or
unmaintained nonnative vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas, or where native vegetation is converted to pasture.
"Creek" is synonymous with "streams," which is defined in ECDC 23.40.005.
"Detention facility" means an above or below ground facility, such as a pond or tank, that temporarily stores
stormwater runoff and subsequently releases it at a slower rate than it is collected by the drainage facility system.
There is little or no infiltration of stored stormwater.
"Development" means land -disturbing activities, including Class IV general forest practices that are conversions
from timber land to other uses. Creation or addition of hard surfaces, or replacement of a hard surface that is not part
of a routine maintenance activity. Structural development, including construction, installation, replacement, or
expansion of a building or other structure. Subdivision, short subdivision, and binding site plans, as defined and
applied in Chapter 58.17 RCW.
"Director" means the city's public works and utilities director or a designee with an appropriate background in
engineering or another related discipline.
"Discharge point" means the location where a discharge leaves the municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4)
through the city's MS4 facilities/BMPs designed to infiltrate.
"Ecology" means the Washington State Department of Ecology.
Packet Pg. 273
7.4.a
"Effective impervious surface" means those impervious surfaces that are connected via sheet flow or discrete
conveyance to a drainage system. Impervious surfaces on residential development sites are considered ineffective if-
(1) the runoff is dispersed through at least 100 feet of native vegetation in accordance with BMP T5.30 — "Full
Dispersion," as described in Chapter 5 of Volume V of the SWMMWW; (2) residential roof runoff is infiltrated in
accordance with downspout full infiltration systems in BMP T5.10A in Volume III of the SWMMWW; or (3)
approved continuous runoff modeling methods indicate the entire runoff file is infiltrated.
"Erodible or leachable materials" means wastes, chemicals, or other substances that measurably alter the physical or
chemical characteristics of runoff when exposed to rainfall. Examples include erodible soils that are stockpiled,
uncovered process wastes, manure, fertilizers, oily substances, ashes, kiln dust, and garbage dumpster leakage.
"Erosion" means the wearing away of the land surface by running water, wind, ice, or other geological agents,
including such processes as gravitational creep. Also, detachment and movement of soil or rock fragments by water,
wind, ice, or gravity. See the SWMMWW Glossary for examples of types of water erosion.
"Excavation" means the mechanical removal of earth material.
"Exception" means relief from the application of a minimum requirement to a project.
"Fill" means a deposit of earth material placed by artificial means.
"Groundwater" means water in a saturated zone or stratum beneath the land surface or below a water body.
"Hard surface" means an impervious surface, a permeable pavement, or a vegetated roof.
"Highway" means a main public road connecting towns and cities. In Edmonds, this includes State Route 99, State
Route 524, and portions of State Route 104, that are classified as principal arterials in the city's comprehensive
transportation plan.
"Illicit discharge" means any direct or indirect nonstormwater discharge to the city's MS4, groundwaters, or a water
body, except as expressly allowed by Chapter 7.200 ECC.
"Impervious surface" means a nonvegetated surface area that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the
soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A nonvegetated surface area which causes water to run
off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions
prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, roof tops, walkways, patios,
driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and
oiled, macadam or other surfaces that similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. Open, uncovered
retention/detention facilities shall not be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of determining whether the
thresholds for application of minimum requirements are exceeded. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities
shall be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of runoff modeling. Outdoor swimming pools shall be
considered impervious surfaces in all situations. In addition, lawns, landscaping, sports fields, golf courses, and
other areas that have modified runoff characteristics resulting from the addition of underdrains and impermeable or
low permeability liners are to be considered impervious surfaces. If no liner is installed, these areas (lawns,
landscaping, sports fields, golf courses, etc.) served by underdrains may be considered partially pervious if the
underdrain is set a minimum of eight inches above the in -situ soils in a manner to allow infiltration over the facility
bottom.
"Lake" means an inland body of fresh water surrounded by land.
"Land disturbing activity" means any activity that results in a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and
nonvegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land -disturbing activities include but are not limited to
demolition, clearing, grading, filling, and excavation. Compaction that is associated with stabilization of structures
and road construction shall also be considered a land -disturbing activity. Vegetation maintenance practices,
including landscape maintenance and gardening, are not considered land -disturbing activity. Stormwater facility
maintenance is not considered land disturbing activity if conducted according to established standards and
procedures.
Packet Pg. 274
7.4.a
"Low impact development (LID)" means a stormwater and land use strategy that strives to mimic predisturbance
hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation and transpiration by emphasizing conservation,
use of on -site features, site planning, and distributed stormwater management practices that are integrated into a
project design.
"LID best management practices (BMPs)" means distributed stormwater management practices, integrated into a
project design, that emphasize predisturbance hydrologic processes of infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation
and transpiration. LID BMPs include, but are not limited to, bioretention, rain gardens, permeable pavements, roof
downspout controls, dispersion, soil quality and depth, minimal excavation foundations, vegetated roofs, and water
reuse.
"LID principles" means land use management strategies that emphasize conservation, use of on -site natural features,
and site planning to minimize impervious surfaces, native vegetation loss, and stormwater runoff.
"Maintenance" means repair and maintenance activities conducted on currently serviceable structures, facilities, and
equipment that involves no expansion or use beyond that previously existing and results in no significant adverse
hydrologic impact. It includes those usual activities taken to prevent a decline, lapse, or cessation in the use of
structures and systems. Those usual activities may include replacement of dysfunctional facilities, including cases
where environmental permits require replacing an existing structure with a different type of structure, as long as the
functioning characteristics of the original structure are not changed. One example is the replacement of a collapsed,
fish -blocking, round culvert with a new box culvert under the same span, or width, of roadway. In regard to
stormwater facilities, maintenance includes assessment to ensure ongoing proper operation, removal of built up
pollutants (i.e., sediments), replacement of failed or failing treatment media, and other actions taken to correct
defects as identified in the maintenance standards of Appendix A, Volume V of the SWMMWW.
"Maximum extent practicable (MEP)" refers to paragraph 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the federal Clean Water Act which
reads as follows: "Permits for discharges from municipal storm sewers shall require controls to reduce the discharge
of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control techniques, and system,
design, and engineering methods, and other such provisions as the Administrator or the State determines appropriate
for the control of such pollutants."
"MS4" means the city's municipal separate storm sewer system.
"Native vegetation" means vegetation comprised of plant species, other than noxious weeds, indigenous to the
coastal region of the Pacific Northwest which could have been reasonably expected to occur naturally on the site.
Examples include trees such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, alder, big -leaf maple, and vine
maple; shrubs such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry, and salal; and herbaceous plants such as sword fern, foam
flower, and fireweed.
"Natural drainage systems and outfalls" means the location of the channels, swales, and other nonmanmade
conveyance systems as defined by the earliest documented topographic contours existing for the subject property,
either from maps or photographs, or such other means as appropriate.
"New development" means land -disturbing activities, including Class IV general forest practices that are
conversions from timberland to other uses; structural development, including construction or installation of a
building or other structure; creation of hard surfaces; and subdivision, short subdivision, and binding site plans, as
defined and applied in Chapter 58.17 RCW. This chapter does not distinguish the difference between new
development and redevelopment; all projects in Edmonds shall meet the requirements for new development.
"New impervious surface" means a surface that is: (1) changed from a pervious surface to an impervious surface
(e.g., resurfacing by upgrading from dirt to gravel, a bituminous surface treatment ("chip seal"), asphalt, concrete, or
an impervious structure); or (2) upgraded from gravel to chip seal, asphalt, concrete, or an impervious structure; or
(3) upgraded from chip seal to asphalt, concrete, or an impervious structure. Note that if asphalt or concrete has been
overlaid by a chip seal, the existing condition should be considered as asphalt or concrete.
"On -site stormwater management BMPs" is a synonym for "low impact development BMPs."
Packet Pg. 275
7.4.a
"Outfall" means a point source as defined by 40 CFR 122.2 at the point where a discharge leaves the city's MS4 and
enters a surface receiving waterbody or surface receiving waters. Outfall does not include pipes, tunnels, or other
conveyances which connect segments of the same stream or other surface waters and are used to convey primarily
surface waters (i.e., culverts).
"Permeable pavement" means pervious concrete, porous asphalt, permeable pavers or other forms of pervious or
porous paving material intended to allow passage of water through the pavement section. It often includes an
aggregate base that provides structural support and acts as a stormwater reservoir.
"Person" means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal
corporation, agency of the state, or city government unit, however designated.
"Pervious surface" means any surface material that allows stormwater to infiltrate into the ground. Examples include
lawn, landscape, pasture, native vegetation areas, and permeable pavements.
"Pollution -generating hard surface (PGHS)" means those hard surfaces considered to be a significant source of
pollutants in stormwater runoff. See the listing of surfaces under pollution -generating impervious surface.
"Pollution -generating impervious surface (PGIS)" means those impervious surfaces considered to be a significant
source of pollutants in stormwater runoff. Such surfaces include those which are subject to: vehicular use; industrial
activities (as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW); storage of erodible or leachable materials, wastes,
or chemicals, and which receive direct rainfall or the run-on or blow-in of rainfall; metal roofs unless they are coated
with an inert, nonleachable material (e.g., baked -on enamel coating); or roofs that are subject to venting significant
amounts of dusts, mists, or fumes from manufacturing, commercial, or other indoor activities.
"Pollution -generating pervious surfaces (PGPS)" means any pervious surface subject to (1) vehicular use, (2)
industrial activities (as further defined in the glossary of the SWMMWW, or (3) storage of erodible or leachable
materials, wastes, or chemicals, and that receive direct rainfall or run-on or blow-in of rainfall, (4) use of pesticides
and fertilizers, or (5) loss of soil. Typical PGPS include permeable pavement subject to vehicular use, lawns, and
landscaped areas including: golf courses, parks, cemeteries, and sports fields (natural and artificial turf).
"Predeveloped condition" means the native vegetation and soils that existed at a site prior to the influence of
Euro-American settlement. The predeveloped condition shall be assumed to be a forested land cover unless
reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement.
"Project" means any proposed action to alter or develop a site.
"Project site" means that portion of a property, properties, and/or right-of-way subject to land -disturbing activities,
new hard surfaces, or replaced hard surfaces. For projects that involve land -disturbing activity on one or more
parcels and/or land -disturbing activity in the city right-of-way, the "project site" includes all areas of land
disturbance. If the project is part of a common development plan or sale, the disturbed area of the entire plan shall be
used in determining permit requirements.
"Rain garden" means a non -engineered shallow landscaped depression, with compost -amended native soils and
adapted plants. The depression is designed to pond and temporarily store stormwater runoff from adjacent areas, and
to allow stormwater to pass through the amended soil profile.
"Receiving waterbody or receiving waters" means naturally and/or reconstructed naturally occurring surface water
bodies, such as creeks, streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands, estuaries, and marine waters, or groundwater, to which a
MS4 discharges.
Redevelopment. This chapter does not distinguish the difference between new development and redevelopment; all
projects in Edmonds shall meet the requirements for new development. Where existing unmitigated surfaces are to
remain, the additional "retrofit" requirement per ECDC 18.30.060(D)(5)(b)(i) applies.
"Replaced hard surface" means, for structures, the removal and replacement of hard surfaces down to the
foundation. For other hard surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base course and replacement.
Packet Pg. 276
7.4.a
"Replaced impervious surface" means, for structures, the removal and replacement of any exterior impervious
surfaces down to the foundation. For other impervious surfaces, it means the removal down to bare soil or base
course and replacement.
"Road -related project" means a project that all of, or the majority of, the new or replaced hard surface consist of
roadway, shoulders, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, or walkways, either publicly or privately funded. Frontage
improvements constructed as a requirement for a development project are not considered a road -related project.
"Roadway" means traveled hard surface portion of any public or private road or street.
"Runoff' means water originating from rainfall and other precipitation that is found in drainage facilities, rivers,
streams, springs, seeps, ponds, lakes and wetlands, as well as shallow groundwater. It also means the portion of
rainfall or other precipitation that becomes surface flow and interflow.
"Site" means the area defined by the legal boundaries of a parcel or parcels of land that is (are) subject to
development. For road projects, or utility projects in the right-of-way, the length of the project site and the
right-of-way boundaries define the site. Note that drainage impacts are generally assessed for the "project site"
under separate definition.
"Slope" means the degree of deviation of a surface from the horizontal; measured as a numerical ratio, percent, or in
degrees. Expressed as a ratio, the first number is the horizontal distance (run) and the second is the vertical distance
(rise), as 2:1. A 2:1 slope is a 50 percent slope. Expressed in degrees, the slope is the angle from the horizontal
plane, with a 90-degree slope being vertical (maximum) and 45 degrees being a 1:1 or 100 percent slope.
"Soil" means the unconsolidated mineral and organic material on the intermediate surface of the earth that serves as
a natural medium for the growth of land plants.
"Source control BMPs" means a structure or operation that is intended to prevent pollutants from coming into
contact wither stormwater through physical separation of areas or careful management of activities that
are sources of pollutants. The SWMMWW separates source control BMPs into two types. Structural source control
BMPs are physical, structural, or mechanical devices, or facilities that are intended to prevent pollutants from
entering stormwater. Operational source control BMPs are nonstructural practices that prevent or reduce pollutants
from entering stormwater. See Volume IV of the SWMMWW for details.
"Stormwater facility" means a constructed component of a stormwater drainage system, designed and constructed to
perform a particular function or multiple functions. Stormwater facilities include, but are not limited to, pipes,
swales, ditches, culverts, street gutters, detention ponds, retention ponds, constructed wetlands, infiltration devices,
catch basins, oil/water separators, and biofiltration swales.
"Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)" means the Washington State
Department of Ecology's 2019 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Referred to as the 2019
SWMMWW.
"Stormwater site plan" means the comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis
necessary for regulatory agencies to evaluate a proposed development project for compliance with stormwater
requirements. Contents of the stormwater site plan will vary with the type and size of the project, and individual site
characteristics. It includes a construction stormwater pollution prevention plan (construction SWPPP) and a
permanent stormwater control plan (PSC Plan). Guidance on preparing a stormwater site plan is contained in
Chapter 3 of Volume I of the SWMMWW.
"Stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities" means detention facilities, treatment BMPs/facilities,
bioretention, vegetated roofs, and permeable pavements that help meet Minimum Requirements No. 6 (Treatment),
Minimum Requirement No. 7 (Flow Control), or both as described in ECDC 18.30.060.
"Threshold discharge area" means an area within a project site draining to a single natural discharge location or
multiple natural discharge locations that combine within one -quarter mile downstream (as determined by the
shortest flowpath). The examples in Figure 1: Example TDA Delineations below illustrate this definition. The
Packet Pg. 277
7.4.a
purpose of this definition is to clarify how the thresholds of this code are applied to project sites with multiple
discharge points.
"Vehicular use" means regular use of an impervious or pervious surface by motor vehicles. The following are
subject to regular vehicular use: roads, unvegetated road shoulders, bike lanes within the traveled lane of a roadway,
driveways, parking lots, unrestricted access fire lanes, vehicular equipment storage yards, and airport runways.
Figure 1: Example TDA Delineations
Example of a Project She
with a single natural
discharge and a single TDA
Single
TDA
Example of a Project Site
with multiple natural
discharges and a single TDA
Single
TDA
Example of a Project She with
multiple natural discharges and
multiple TDAs
TDA iTDA
i 2
Natural
discharge--•- Natural/• Natural —
Greater than discharge _ discharge
location 114 mile �. ,F' locations 114 mile' locations
/114 mile
Example of a road project with muhiple
discharge points and a single TDA
�� i I r� a r! �► Z
i r
r �
Discharge �. 114 mile , 114 mile
location
114 mie �.. - —
114 mhe
Because the right -most discharge
connects to the other two discharge flow
paths within i mile, all areas are
connected as one TDA.
Example o1 a road project with multiple
i
II y I discharge points and multiple TDAs.
i
'� Discharge '. 1!4 mile
Note: Shaded
areas represent
the limps of the
'� location �"�� I
-`—'s
project she.
..
1,4 _
NOT TO SCALE
liirr
Example TDA Delineations
DEPARTMENT OF Revised March 2016
ECOLOGY Please see httplAvww.ecy wa.govlcopynghthtml for copyright notice including permissions.
State of Washington limitation of liability, and disclaimer,
The following are not considered subject to regular vehicular use: sidewalks not subject to drainage from roads for
motor vehicles, paved bicycle pathways separated from and not subject to drainage from roads for motor vehicles,
restricted access fire lanes, and infrequently used maintenance access roads.
"Waterbody" means surface waters including rivers, streams, lakes, marine waters, estuaries, and wetlands.
"Waters of the state" includes those waters defined as "waters of the United States" in 40 CFR 122.2 within the
geographic boundaries of Washington State, and "waters of the state" as defined in Chapter 90.48 RCW which
Packet Pg. 278
7.4.a
includes lakes, rivers, ponds, streams, inland waters, underground waters, salt waters and all other surface waters
and water courses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington.
"Wetlands" means as defined in ECDC 23.40.005. [Ord. 4263 § 1 (Att. A), 2022; Ord. 4044 § 1 (Att. A), 2016].
Section 18.30.020 Authority and regulation.
A. The public works and utilities director shall administer this chapter and shall be referred to as the director.
B. The director shall have the authority to develop, implement, and enforce policies (such as the Edmonds
StormwaterAddendum) and procedures to administer and enforce this chapter per ECDC 18.30.440100. and-
C. The requirements of this chapter are minimum requirements. They do not replace, repeal, abrogate, supersede, or
affect any other more stringent requirements, rules, regulations, covenants, standards, or restrictions. Where this
chapter imposes requirements that are more protective of human health or the environment than those set forth
elsewhere, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. When this chapter imposes requirements that are less
protective of human health or the environment than those set forth elsewhere, the provisions of the more protective
requirements shall prevail.
D. The director shall have the authority to impose additional requirements on a project or site to meet the purpose of
this chapter based on site -specific factors including, but not limited to, location, soil conditions, slope, and
designated use.
E. Approvals and permits granted under this chapter are not waivers of the requirements of any other laws, nor do
they indicate compliance with any other laws. Compliance is still required with all applicable federal, state and local
laws and regulations, including rules promulgated under authority of this chapter.
F. Compliance with the provisions of this chapter does not necessarily mitigate all impacts to the environment. Thus,
compliance with this chapter should not be construed as mitigating all drainage water or other environmental
impacts, and additional mitigation may be required to protect the environment pursuant to other applicable laws and
regulations. The primary obligation for compliance with this chapter and for preventing environmental harm on or
from property is placed upon the applicant. [Ord. 4263 § 1 (Att. A), 2022; Ord. 4044 § 1 (Att. A), 2016].
Section 18.30.050 Administration.
A. Application, Submittals, and Review.
1. The director shall review all plans and all other submittals required by subsection (A)(3) of this section for
compliance with this chapter when:
a. An application for a city permit is required under all other chapters of this title or ECDC Title 19; or
b. A subdivision application is submitted per ECDC 20.75.040.
2. In all other situations when actions under ECDC 18.30.030 apply to a project site, review shall be under a
stormwater permit.
3. All stormwater review submittals shall contain, in addition to the information required under any other
applicable city code, a stormwater site plan as described in the Edmonds stormwater addendum (see ECDC
18.30.060) and any other information required by the director.
B. Inspections.
Packet Pg. 279
7.4.a
1. The director shall inspect projects at various stages of the work to determine if they comply with the
requirements of this chapter, and enforcement actions shall be taken as necessary. These inspections will
include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Prior to site clearing and construction to assess site erosion potential; and
b. During construction to verify proper installation and maintenance of required erosion and sediment
controls and other approved plan components; and
c. All permanent stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities and catch basins in new
residential developments every six months until 90 percent of the lots are constructed (or when
construction is stopped and the site is fully stabilized) to identify maintenance needs and enforce
compliance with maintenance standards as needed; and
d. Upon completion of construction and prior to final approval to ensure proper installation of permanent
stormwater control facilities and verify that a maintenance plan is completed and responsibility for
maintenance is assigned for stormwater treatment and flow control BMPs/facilities; and
e. Post construction inspections per ECDC 18.30.090.
2. When reasonably required by the director to accomplish the purpose of this chapter or to comply with local,
state or federal law or regulation on stormwater, special inspection or testing shall be performed by the
applicant.
C. Fees. Application, review and inspection fees as set in Chapter- 0 ECDC 15.00.020 shall be paid. [Ord. 4263
§ 1 (Art. A), 2022; Ord. 4044 § 1 (Att. A), 2016].
Section 18.30.090 Post construction inspection and maintenance roles and responsibilities.
Proper construction inspection and maintenance of stormwater facilities and operational and structural source
control BMPs at businesses/sites is essential for the protection of the city's MS4 and the environment.
A. Stormwater Maintenance and Inspection Standards. Stormwater facilities shall be inspected and maintained per
the requirements of Volume I and Volume V of the SWMMWW. For systems which do not have a maintenance
standard, the owner shall develop a standard based on guidelines from the manufacturer, designer, or a registered
professional engineer and submit the standards to the director for approval. The purpose of the maintenance standard
is to determine if maintenance is required. The maintenance standard is not a measure of the facility's required
condition at all times between inspections. Exceeding the maintenance standard between inspections is not a
violation of this chapter. Operational and structural source control BMPs shall be inspected per the requirements of
Volume IV of the SWMMWW.
B. Ownership. Stormwater facilities are either privately or publicly owned and maintained. All stormwater facilities
that serve private property are private, unless an agreement between the property owner and the city states
otherwise. Stormwater facilities that are privately owned by a homeowner's association or similar organization also
are private. The city may offer an incentive program to owners to support the proper maintenance of private
stormwater facilities.
C. Public Stormwater Facilities. The city shall be responsible for operating, maintaining, repairing, and replacing
public stormwater facilities as funded through the stormwater utility.
D. Maintenance of Permanent Stormwater Facilities. All privately owned stormwater facilities or controls shall be
maintained by the owner, or the homeowner or owner association ("owner") if one is established as part of a
residential or commercial development. All private storm drainage facilities shall be regularly inspected to ensure
proper operation and shall monitor the facility or control as required or as set forth in the SWMMWW. The owner
shall maintain records of inspection and maintenance, disposal receipts, and monitoring results. The records shall
catalog the action taken, the person who took it, the date said action was taken, how it was done, and any problems
encountered or follow-up actions required. The records shall be made available to the city upon request. The owner
Packet Pg. 280
7.4.a
shall maintain a copy of the Stormwater Operations and Maintenance Manual (if required) on site, and shall make
reference to such document in real property records filed with Snohomish County, so others who acquire real
property served by the privately owned stormwater facilities or controls are notified of their obligation to maintain
such facilities or controls.
E. City Inspection of Private Stormwater Facilities. The city shall have the authority to periodically inspect private
stormwater facilities, including LID stormwater facilities, for compliance with this chapter.
F. City Inspection of Existing Businesses/Sites. The city shall have the authority to periodically inspect private
businesses and sites for compliance with Minimum Requirement No. 3, Source Control of Pollution (ECDC
18.30.060(D)(3)).
G. Right of Entry. An authorized representative of the city may enter private property at all reasonable times to
conduct inspections, tests or to carry out other duties imposed by a state or federal program; provided, that the city
makes a good faith effort to notify the property owner or person responsible for the premises prior to entering and
presents proper credentials to that person. If entry is refused or cannot be obtained, the director shall have recourse
to every remedy provided by law to secure entry, including, but not limited to, obtaining an administrative warrant
for entry.
H. Right of Entry for Illicit Discharge. In the event of an illicit discharge from a privately owned stormwater facility
caused by improper maintenance or operation or other circumstance, the provisions of Chapter 7.200 ECC shall
apply.
I. Maintenance Responsibilities. Upon written notice by the city, a private stormwater facility shall be promptly
repaired and/or brought up to applicable standards by the property owner or the person responsible for said facility.
If a private stormwater facility serves multiple lots and the responsibility for maintenance has not been specified on
a recorded subdivision plat, short plat, or other legal document, maintenance, operation and repair responsibility
shall rest with the homeowners' association, if one exists, or otherwise with the properties served by the facility, or
finally, with the owners of the property on which the facilities are located. Operational and structural source control
BMPs are also required to be repaired and/or brought up to applicable standards by the property owner or the person
responsible for the business/site.
J. Disposal of Waste from Maintenance Activities. Disposal of waste from maintenance activities shall be conducted
in accordance with the minimum functional standards for solid waste handling, Chapter 173-304 WAC, guidelines
for disposal of waste materials from storm wate stormwater maintenance activities, and where appropriate, the
dangerous waste regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC. [Ord. 4263 § 1 (Att. A), 2022; Ord. 4044 § 1 (Att. A), 2016].
Section 18.60.040 Fees.
Application and inspection fees shall be as set in Chapter ECDC 15.00.020, established by the city council
resolution in its sole legislative discretion. [Ord. 3485 § 1, 2004].
Section 18.70.030 Review.
A. Architectural Design Board. Any application for a permit to construct, erect or maintain an awning, marquee,
sign or any structure in a public place, except as otherwise allowed in subsection (C) of this section, may be referred
by the planning and development director or his/her designee to the architectural design board. If referred to the
board, the board shall review the plans and specifications as they relate to Chapter 20.10 ECDC.
Applications for mobile street vending units shall be reviewed in accordance with ECC 4.12.055 by the architectural
design board.
B. Edmonds Arts Commission. Applications for an encroachment permit or a street use permit to install art in the
public right-of-way shall be subject to the review and recommendation of the Edmonds arts commission. No art
Packet Pg. 281
7.4.a
shall be permitted in the public right-of-way except as expressly permitted herein. Artwork that is reviewed under an
encroachment permit shall be exempt of the requirements of ECDC 18.70.020(B)(5), (6), (7) and (10).
1. The term "art" or "artwork" as used in this section shall refer only to a work of visual art existing in a single
copy or in multiple copies of 200 or fewer that are consecutively numbered by the author and bear the signature
or other identifying mark of the author.
2. The term "art" or "artwork" does not include:
a. Any poster, map, globe, chart, technical drawing, diagram, model, applied art, motion picture or other
audiovisual work, book, magazine, newspaper, periodical, database, electronic information service,
electronic publication, or similar publication;
b. Any merchandising item or advertising, promotional, descriptive, covering, or packaging material or
container;
c. Architectural details such as masonry, ironwork, or other building fixtures or materials;
d. Any portion or part of any item described in subsection (13)(2)(a), (b) or (c) of this section;
e. Any work not subject to copyright protection under the Visual Artists Rights Act, as codified under
federal copyright law, U.S.C. Title 17, as the same exists or is hereafter amended.
3. An encroachment permit or street use permit requires determination of public benefit. The Edmonds arts
commission (EAC) is mandated in Chapter 10.20 ECC to advise the city on matters pertaining to art. When the
proposed encroachment or street use is art, EAC will review and make written recommendations to the
public works director and city engineer for use and consideration in permit
issuance. (See subsection (C) of this section.)
4. The public right-of-way is a traditional forum for public expression. By this permit program the city
acknowledges that it is approving uses in a limited public forum. Art, like other exercises of First Amendment
rights, may be limited by reasonable time, place and manner restrictions. In this case, these criteria will be
utilized to protect the safety of the public who use the right-of-way for pedestrian or vehicular traffic and to
ensure that the city provides for accessibility for the disabled. No recommendation or denial shall be based
upon the content or message expressed by an artist or in a work of art as long as there is no commercial content.
Applicants are encouraged to coordinate their artwork with the design of the building and the historic and
pedestrian -oriented character of the downtown area.
5. Specific submission requirements for EAC review include, but are not limited to:
a. Site plan sketch showing locations of artwork;
b. Minimum one -quarter -inch scale rendering of the art concept or art component, including at least one
elevation showing the art in context or comparable photographs of actual artwork in context;
c. Material/color samples;
d. Model (optional);
e. Written proposal• seven eopies of w -44e proposal eight aaa e lialf by " ineh f ,.. at to include:
t el'a o
i. A description and summary of a final design proposal for the artwork for the proposed project;
ii. Detailed maintenance requirements;
iii. Schedule for development, fabrication, and completion;
Packet Pg. 282
7.4.a
iv. Artists' resume/background;
v. Evidence of assumption of liability by applicant or designee.
For proposal to be reviewed at next scheduled EAC meeting, a complete submission of all requirements must
be received a minimum of 10 days prior to the date of the meeting.
Additional requirements may be requested based on staff input or information sought by EAC members.
6. Review Criteria. Art in public places may be art standing alone, modifiers or definers of space, functional, or
used to establish identity. The use of art as an integral part of the structure and function of building is
encouraged, e.g., the interpretation of light fixtures, benches, hardware, doors, surface finishes, walkways,
gates, and other features with the artwork or as a part of the artwork, although only some of these elements
would occur in the public right-of-way.
The criteria for review of encroachment or street use review artwork submissions are as follows:
a. Constructability of proposed artwork. No artwork shall impair disabled accessibility and barrier -free
design requirements.
b. Artist's credentials and recognition.
c. Durability and craftsmanship in fabrication and production quality. Quality of the work is a high
priority.
d. Due consideration shall be given to the structural and surface soundness of artworks and to their
permanence, including ability to withstand age, theft, vandalism, weathering, and maintenance and
possible related repair costs. Careful consideration shall be given to the materials used and the
appropriateness of those materials for the conditions of the site.
e. Coordination of the artwork with the design of the building and the historic and pedestrian -oriented
character of the downtown area is encouraged.
f. Maintenance/conservation plan.
g. Relationship to other existing artwork in vicinity.
h. No Commercial Content. Artwork shall not be used as signage (see definition of signage).
C. Issuance by the Planning and Development Director or City Engineer. The planning and development director,
city engineer or their respective designee may administratively, without hearing, approve a street use or
encroachment permit if:
1. The proposed use shall not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic, including but not limited to the
following requirements:
a. No portion of the public right-of-way designed and intended for vehicular traffic or parking shall be
permanently occupied;
b. Requirements of the State Building Code, including but not limited to all provisions relating to disabled
accessibility and barrier -free design requirements shall be met;
c. Any mobile vending units shall be properly licensed pursuant to Chapter 4.12 ECC;
d. Permit application fees have been paid (see ECDC 18.70.050);
e. A "clear zone" must be maintained on public sidewalks or walkways. A clear zone refers to an area
seven feet in height and five feet in width providing a level, safe walking surface along the public
Packet Pg. 283
7.4.a
sidewalk. Clear zone on sidewalks shall not include any curbing, planting strips or ramps. For tables and
chairs placed in the public right-of-way, the clear zone can be reduced to four feet in width in front of
obstacles (trees, street lights, sign posts, etc.);
f. All temporary objects shall be removed from the right-of-way on 24 hours' notice to accommodate
public events. Temporary objects are subject to removal in the event of an emergency; and
g. All temporary objects, excluding approved awnings, and wall signs, that project more than 36 inches
into the right-of-way shall be removed each day at the close of business.
2. Exclusive Sidewalk Dining. In an effort to enhance street life of the city and serve both an economic
development purpose as well as enhance the livability of the city's urban core, exclusive sidewalk dining shall
be allowed pursuant to ECDC 17.70.040.
a. For purposes of this section the following terms are defined as:
i. "Exclusive sidewalk dining" shall refer to a properly zoned and licensed food or beverage service
establishment that uses the public right-of-way to serve only its customers at the exclusion of the
general public.
ii. "Barrier" shall refer to any temporary object or objects (e.g., stanchion, rope, markers) used to
establish an exclusive bistro and outdoor dining area. Barriers shall be approved by the city engineer.
b. All conditions and requirements set forth in this chapter have been met and adequate compensation for
the exclusive use of the public right-of-way and applicant fees pursuant to ECDC 18.70.050 have been
paid.
c. All barriers, with the exception of markers and marking, shall be removed each day from the
right-of-way at the close of business.
d. The design and use shall comply with all requirements of state law, city ordinance and city policy
including but not limited to:
i. Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) and Snohomish County health division
(SCHD). When applicable, the business shall provide a written approval from the WSLCB and/or
SCHD for use of public rights -of -way;
ii. ECDC 17.70.040, exclusive sidewalk dining; and
iii. All litter and nuisance regulations, including but not limited to RCW 70.93.060 and Chapter 6.40
ECC.
3. The design board has reviewed and approved any proposal which includes a request to construct, erect or
maintain an awning, building, sign or any building or structure, except as otherwise allowed in subsection (C)
of this section;
4. The proposal will not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the public; and
5. The proposal (if for an encroachment permit) either benefits the public interest, safety or convenience (e.g.,
supports or protects the city street, reduces pedestrian hazards) or is an accessory structure such as a fence
normally associated with residential use of the property and fully complies with the requirements of subsections
(13)(1) through (3) of this section.
D. Bay Windows, Decks, and Related Architectural Features. In an effort to allow for more creative designs and a
better overall appearance in the downtown area, bay windows, decks, and related architectural features may
encroach into the public right-of-way within the central business district or any other zone in which no setback from
the lot line is required, subject to the following requirements:
Packet Pg. 284
7.4.a
1. All conditions and requirements set forth in this chapter have been met and adequate compensation has been
paid;
2. The encroachment shall not occur over alleys;
3. The building encroachment shall not project more than two feet (24 inches) into the right-of-way;
4. The encroachment shall not exceed 30 percent of the length of the facade on any one side of the building;
5. The encroachment shall provide for a minimum clearance height of eight feet over any pedestrian
right-of-way and a minimum clearance height of 11 feet over any vehicular right-of-way, whichever is greater;
6. The encroachment shall be approved by the architectural design board as contributing to a modulated facade
design which enhances the variation and appearance to the public of the overall building design and public
streetscape.
E. Appeal. The decision of the planning and development director, city engineer, or their respective designees may
be appealed to the hearing examiner as a Type II proceeding under the procedures set forth in Chapter 20.06 ECDC;
provided, however, that the establishment of compensation for use of the public right-of-way is a legislative decision
of the city council and is not subject to judicial review.
F. Awnings and Canopies. Consistent with ECDC 22.43.040, awnings and canopies, whether architectural or
temporary, may encroach into the public right-of-way within the central business district or any other zone in which
no setback from the lot line is required, subject to the following:
1. The awning or canopy shall provide a minimum clearance height of eight feet above the walking surface, not
to exceed 15 feet at its highest point.
2. Awning and canopy projection over the right-of-way shall be determined as follows; provided, that no
awning or canopy shall project within two feet of the street curb (measured from the back of curb):
Sidewalk Width Minimum Projection
Less than 8 feet 5 feet
8 feet or greater 6 feet
3. Awnings and canopies shall not be constructed at a location or in a manner that will obstruct, obscure, or
interfere with any streetlight, flower pole, utility pole or appurtenance, street tree, or any transportation -related
sign, signal, or traffic control device.
4. All awning and canopy designs shall meet the above criteria, unless otherwise approved by the city engineer
G. Insurance Requirement. When the application is for use or encroachment onto a public right-of-way including but
not limited to streets, roads, alleys, trails, sidewalks, bike paths, pedestrian easements, and any other easement
intended for the use of the public, the applicant who operates a business or commercial operation shall be required to
provide and continually maintain during the term of the permit a certificate of insurance naming the city as an
additional insured, with respect to liability, and providing that it shall be primary as to any other policy of insurance.
The policy must contain the additional insured statement, coverage amounts and cancellation notification indicated
on the sample insurance form provided by the city. In addition, a business and commercial applicant as well as all
residential or nonprofit applicants shall sign a covenant to hold harmless and indemnify the city which will be
recorded and run with the land in a form approved by the city attorney.
H. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to permit the base or ground support for any sign to be located upon or
attached to the ground within the public right-of-way. [Ord. 4299 § 32 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4244 § 1 (Exh. A),
2022; Ord. 4243 § 1 (Exh. A), 2021; Ord. 4209 § 1 (Exh. A), 2020; Ord. 3790 § 1, 2010].
Packet Pg. 285
7.4.a
Section 18.80.060 Driveway and curb cut requirements.
A. Permit Required. No person shall begin work on the construction alteration, repair or removal of any driveway or
the paving of any parking strip on any or adjacent to any street, alley or other public place in the city, without first
obtaining a permit from the public works director. Fees shall be as set forth in Chapter-00 ECDC 15.00.020.
B. Location.
1. No driveway shall be so located as to create a hazard to pedestrians, bicyclists or motorists or invite or
compel illegal or unsafe traffic movements.
2. Unless otherwise approved by the public works director, all driveways including the returns shall be
confined within lines perpendicular to the curb line and passing through the property corners.
3. No driveway shall be constructed in such a manner as to be a hazard to any existing street lighting standard,
utility pole, traffic regulating device, or fire hydrant. The cost of relocating any such street structure when
necessary to do so shall be paid by the abutting property owner. The relocation of any street structure shall be
allowed only on approval of the person owning the structure involved.
4. On private property every driveway must provide access to parking structures or access specifically
designated for parking purposes requiring the entrance of vehicles.
5. Downtown Business Area. Within the downtown business area of the city as defined in ECDC 17.50.070,
vehicular access shall be provided from alleyways for all on -site parking whenever it is practically and
reasonably available. No curb cut shall be approved where there is vehicular access to a lot in the downtown
area from an existing alleyway unless the applicant demonstrates by substantial evidence that:
a. One of the following conditions exist:
i. No alleyway exists which would provide reasonable vehicular access to the subject property; or
ii. Access from an existing alleyway would substantially impair reasonable access to an abutting public
street or utility because of circumstances related to site size, topography or orientation; or
iii. Access can be provided from an existing or relocated driveway or curb cut in a manner which
preserves or enhances street parking; or
iv. Providing access from a point other than the alley would promote traffic safety, or otherwise better
promote the purposes of the transportation element of the comprehensive plan.
b. The application complies with all other criteria of the community development code.
c. In such cases, the city engineer may then consider use of an existing common driveway or other
alternative. Only when no other reasonable alternative exists for access to a property will a curb cut be
approved which results in the loss of existing on -street parking. No more than one access point per lot will
be permitted in the downtown business area. The city engineer's decision to approve alternative access
shall be processed as a Type II project permit application and decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC).
C. Size and Number. Except as otherwise provided, the width of any residential driveway shall not exceed 20 feet
exclusive of the radii of the turns, with such measurement being made parallel with the center line of the street.
Driveway approaches shall extend from the edge of the existing street a distance of 20 feet or to the edge of the
property line, whichever is greater. Approaches shall be constructed of asphalt concrete pavement or an equivalent
approved by the city engineer. The standard width for commercial and other nonresidential streets shall be 30 feet.
At the application of the applicant or the city engineer, additional width in excess of the established standard may be
approved as a staff decision to a maximum width of 40 feet. Such decision shall be made only after notice as a Type
II project permit application and decision (see Chapter 20.01 ECDC). Such application shall be approved only if. (a)
it conforms to the provisions of the comprehensive plan; (b) is found to be in the public interest when the needs of
the applicant are reviewed and balanced in light of the benefits to the general public and the impacts, if any, on the
immediate neighborhood; and (c) is consistent with or enhances public safety and will not create a hazard to
Packet Pg. 286
7.4.a
vehicular, pedestrian or bicycle traffic. The public works director may authorize additional residential driveway
width for three -car garages and for access driveways necessary for off-street parking or recreational vehicles.
D. Driveway Slopes.
1. Driveway slopes shall not exceed 14 percent unless authorized by the public works director in accordance
with the criteria set forth below. The decision of the public works director shall be made only after notice as a
Type II project permit application and decision. (See Chapter 20.01 ECDC.)
2. The public works director may authorize driveway slopes to exceed 14 percent up to a maximum of 20
percent if he determines that:
a. The driveway is the only economical and environmentally reasonable alternative;
b. The driveway will not present a traffic, pedestrian, bicycle or safety hazard or otherwise negatively
impact public safety;
c. The police and fire chief concur in allowing the increased driveway slope; and
d. The public health, safety and general welfare will not be adversely affected.
3. The decision of the public works director shall be in writing and placed in the appropriate city file pursuant
to a signed, written statement of finding and conclusions for authorizing the driveway slope to exceed 14
percent. The statement shall also contain the maximum slope authorized up to 20 percent.
4. The decision of the public works director shall be processed as a project permit application and shall be
appealable as a Type II appeal under the procedures in Chapter 20.06 ECDC. [Ord. 3788 § 11, 2010; Ord. 3736
§§ 31, 32, 2009; Ord. 3302 § 1, 2000; Ord. 3132 § 1, 1997; Ord. 2713, 1989].
Section 19.00.025 International Building Code section amendments.
The following sections of the IBC are hereby amended as follows:
A. Section 101.4.3, Plumbing, is amended to read:
The provisions of the Uniform Plumbing Code shall apply to the installation, alteration, repair
and replacement of plumbing systems, including equipment, appliances, fixtures, fittings and
appurtenances, and where connected to a water or sewage system and all aspects of a medical
gas system.
B. Section 101.4.6, Energy, is amended to read:
The provisions of the Washington State Energy Code shall apply to all matters governing the
design and construction of buildings for energy efficiency.
C. Section 104.3, Notices and Orders, is amended to read:
The building official shall issue all necessary notices or orders to ensure compliance with this
code. The building official is also authorized to use Chapter 20.110 ECDC for code
compliance in addition to the remedies provided for in this code.
D. Section 105.1.1, Annual Permit, is deleted.
E. Section 105.1.1, Demolition Permits, is added and shall read:
Packet Pg. 287
7.4.a
Before the partial or complete demolition of any building or structure (interior or exterior), a
demolition permit shall be obtained from the building official. The permit fee is established
pursuant to Chapter 19.70 ECDC. The applicant shall also post with the city, prior to permit
issuance, a performance bond, or frozen fund, conforming to Chapter 17.10 ECDC herein, in
an amount to be determined by the building official to satisfy all city requirements no later
than 180 days after the issuance of the permit. The demolition performance bond or frozen
fund shall not be released until the building official determines the following requirements
have been completed:
1. Cap Abandoned Sanitary Sewers. Septic tanks shall be pumped, collapsed and removed
and/or filled with earth, sand, concrete, CDF or hard slurry.
2. Knock Down of Concrete Foundation Walls, Porches, Chimneys and Similar Structures.
Concrete, bricks, cobbles and boulders shall be broken to less than 12-inch diameter. Debris
left on site shall conform to IBC Section 1804.2 for clean fill.
3. Construction debris, vegetation, and garbage attributable to the demolition shall be
removed from the site and from unopened street right-of-way within 30 days of written notice.
No debris of any kind may be placed or maintained on street right-of-way (including alleys)
without a permit issued pursuant to Chapter 18.60 or 18.70 of the Edmonds Community
Development Code.
4. Repair of any damage to, and restoration of, any public property to substantially original
conditions, i.e., alley, street, sidewalk, landscaping, water, sewer, storm and other utilities,
rockeries, retaining walls, etc, in accordance with this code and the City's engineering
requirements.
5. Grading of Site Back to Original Topography Grades. Basements shall be filled and
compacted to 90 percent as verified by a special inspector. "Structural fill" is defined as any
fill placed below structures, including slabs, where the fill soils need to support loads without
unacceptable deflections or shearing. Structural fill shall be c lean and free draining, placed
above unyielding native site soils and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent modified
proctor, per ASTM D1557.
6. Temporary erosion control shall be installed and maintained per Chapter 18.30 ECDC.
F. Section 105.1.2, Annual Permit Records, is deleted.
G. Section 105.2, Work Exempt From Permit, is replaced as follows:
Exemptions from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization
for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other
laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. It is the applicant's responsibility to comply with bulk
zoning code standards per ECDC Title 16 andstefm ei stormwater management
provisions per Chapter 18.30 ECDC. Permits shall not be required for the following unless
required by the provisions of ECDC Title 23 or limited or prohibited by the provisions of
Chapter 19.10 ECDC:
1. Building (general):
(a) One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and
similar uses; provided the floor area (including the exterior wall or post) does not exceed 120
square feet, with a maximum eave of thirty (30) inches.
(b) Fences not over six (6) feet high; provided a permit is not required by Chapter 17.30
ECDC.
(c) Movable cases, counters and partitions not over five (5) feet nine (9) inches high.
Packet Pg. 288
7.4.a
(d) Retaining walls 4 feet (1,219 mm) in height or less measured vertically from the finished
grade at the exposed toe of the retaining wall to the highest point in the wall, unless:
i. Supporting a surcharge; or
ii. Impounding Class I, II, III -A liquids; or
iii. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
(e) Rockeries. Construction of rockeries is limited as specified elsewhere in this code.
(f) Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons
and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed two (2) to one (1).
(g) Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches above adjacent grade, and not over any
basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route, provided a permit is not
required by Chapter 18.60 ECDC.
(h) Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, countertops and similar finish work
provided that existing, required accessible features are not altered.
(i) Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery.
0) Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes.
(k) Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to an occupancy in which the pool walls are
entirely above the adjacent grade and the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons. Hot tubs
and spas less than 5,000 gallons, completely supported by the ground.
(1) Grading less than fifty (50) cubic yards (placed, removed or moved within any 365-day
period) unless subject to the provisions of Chapter 23.50 ECDC or Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
(m) Repair of appliances which do not alter original approval, certification, listing or code.
(n) Replacement or adding new insulation with no drywall removal or placement.
(o) Replacement or repair of existing gutters or downspouts.
(p) The following types of signs are exempt from permit requirements except that dimensional
size and placement standards shall comply with Chapter 20.60 ECDC:
i. Replacing the panel on a previously permitted existing wall cabinet or pole sign,
ii. Repainting an existing previously permitted wood sign,
iii. Painted or vinyl lettering on storefront windows,
iv. Governmental signs, campaign signs, official public notices, and signs required by
provision of local, state, or federal law,
v. Temporary signs announcing the sale or rent of property and other temporary signs as described
in ECDC 20.60.080,
vi. Signs erected by the transportation authorities, and temporary seasonal and holiday
displays.
2. Mechanical:
(a) Portable heating, ventilation, cooling, cooking or clothes drying appliances.
Packet Pg. 289
7.4.a
(b) Replacement of any part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such
equipment unsafe.
(c) Portable fuel cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and are not
interconnected to a power grid.
(d) Steam, hot or chilled water piping within any heating or cooling equipment regulated by
this code.
(e) Portable evaporative cooler.
(f) Self-contained refrigeration systems containing ten (10) pounds or less of refrigerant or
that are actuated by motor of one (1) horsepower or less.
3. Plumbing:
(a) The stopping of leaks in drains, water, soil, waste or vent pipe, provided that the
replacement of defective material shall be done with new material and a permit obtained and
inspection made.
(b) Reinstallation or replacement of approved prefabricated plumbing fixtures that do not
involve or require the replacement or rearrangement of valves or pipes.
4. Residential permit exemptions:
In addition the following exemptions apply for single family dwellings:
(a) One (1) story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and
similar uses; provided the floor area (including the exterior wall or post) does not exceed 200
square feet, with a maximum eave of twelve (12) inches and maximum height of fifteen (15)
feet. Vehicle storage structures, such as garages and carports, are not exempted.
(b) Window awnings supported by an exterior wall and do not project more than fifty-four
(54) inches from the exterior wall and do not require additional support.
(c) Sport courts less than 2,000 square feet.
(d) Dock repair of individual decking members. ECDC Title 24 provisions shall apply.
(e) Replacement or repair of existing exterior siding.
(f) Replacement or repair of existing windows or doors provided; no alteration of structural
members is required, safety glazing is provided where required, glazing U-value meets
prescriptive requirements of the energy code, fall protection is provided where required, and
egress requirements are maintained.
(g) Minor like -for -like drywall repairs not involving fire -rated assemblies.
(h) Replacement or repair of decking, or individual joists, stair treads, or intermediate rails.
(i) Uncovered platforms, decks, patios that are not more than thirty (30) inches above grade
(measured vertically to the grade below at any point within 36 inches of the outer edge of the
deck).
0) Canopies, as defined in ECDC 17.70.035, accessory to a single family dwelling, with a
floor area measured to the exterior wall or post not to exceed 200 square feet, for covered
storage, carport or similar use.
Packet Pg. 290
7.4.a
(k) Reroof overlays. Overlays are not permitted over slate, clay or cement tiles, or where the
existing roof has two or more applications of any type of roofing.
H. Section 105.3.2, Time Limitation of Permit Application, is amended to read:
1. Applications, for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of
application, shall expire by limitation, and plans and other data submitted for review may
thereafter be returned to the applicant or destroyed by the building official.
2. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not
exceeding 180 days prior to such expiration date.
3. No application shall be extended more than once for a total application life of 360 days
except as allowed within this section. In order to renew action on an expired application, the
applicant shall submit a new application, revised plans based on any applicable code or
ordinance change, and pay new plan review fees.
4. The Building Official may extend the life of an application if any of the following
conditions exist:
(a) Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act is in progress; or
(b) Any other City review is in progress; provided, the applicant has submitted a complete
response to City requests or the Building Official determines that unique or unusual
circumstances exist that warrant additional time for such response and the Building Official
determines that the review is proceeding in a timely manner toward final City decision; or
(c) Litigation against the City or applicant is in progress, the outcome of which may affect the
validity or the provisions of any permit issued pursuant to such application.
I. Section 105.3.3, Fully Complete Application, is added and reads:
In accordance with the provisions of RCW 19.27.031 and 19.27.074, an applicant's rights
shall vest when a fully complete building permit application is filed. A fully complete
building permit application is an application executed by the owners of the property for which
the application is submitted or the duly authorized agent(s) for such owners, containing each
and every document required under the terms of these ordinances and the IBC and is
substantially complete in all respects. It is anticipated that minor changes or revisions may be
required and are frequently made in the course of any building application review process,
and such minor revisions or changes shall not keep an application from being deemed
complete if a good faith attempt has been made to submit a substantially complete application
containing all required components. Where required, the application and supporting
documents shall be stamped and/or certified by the appropriate engineering, surveying or
other professional consultants. A fully complete building permit application shall be
accompanied by all required intake fees, including but not limited to plan review fees required
under the provisions of this chapter and code.
J. Section 105.3.4, Concurrent Review, is added and reads:
An applicant may submit an application for building permit approval and request plan review
services concurrently with, or at any time following, the submittal of a complete application
for any necessary or required discretionary permit approval or discretionary hearing;
provided, that any building permit application submitted concurrently with an application for
discretionary permit or approvals shall not be considered complete unless the applicant
submits a signed statement, on a form approved by the director, which acknowledges that the
building permit application is subject to any conditions or requirements imposed pursuant to
the review and approval of any necessary or required discretionary permit or approvals. The
Packet Pg. 291
7.4.a
applicant shall solely bear the risk of building permit submittal with discretionary permit
approval. If, after discretionary approval, the building permit plans are modified or amended
to comply with conditions or restrictions required by any discretionary permit or approval, the
applicant shall be solely responsible for any and all costs which result therefrom, including
but not limited to additional full plan review fees; provided further, that any
applicant -initiated changes made after the original plan review is complete shall also require
payment of full plan review fees.
K. Section 105.5, Permit Expiration and Extension, is amended to read:
1. Every permit issued under ECDC Title 19 shall expire by limitation 360 days after
issuance, except as provided in ECDC 19.00.025I(2).
2. The following permits shall expire by limitation, 180 days after issuance and may not be
extended, unless they are associated with a primary building permit for a larger construction
project, in which case they may run with the life of the primary permit:
Demolition permits;
Permits for Moving Buildings required by Chapter 19.60 ECDC;
Mechanical permits;
Tank removal, tank fill, or tank placement permits;
Grading, excavation and fill permits;
Water service line permits;
Plumbing permits;
Gas piping permits;
Deck and dock permits;
Fence permits;
Re -roof permits;
Retaining wall permits;
Swimming pool, hot tub and spa permits;
Sign permits;
Shoring permits;
Foundation permits.
3. Prior to expiration of an active permit the applicant may request in writing an extension for
an additional year. Provided there has been at least one (1) required progress inspection
conducted by the city building inspector prior to the extension, the permit shall be extended.
Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one quarter the original building permit fee to extend
the permit.
4. If the applicant cannot complete work issued under an extended permit within a total period
of two (2) years, the applicant may request in writing, prior to the second year expiration, an
extension for a third and final year. Provided there has been at least one (1) required progress
inspection conducted by the city building inspector after the previous extension, the permit
Packet Pg. 292
7.4.a
shall be extended. Permit fees shall be charged at a rate of one quarter the original building
permit fee to extend the permit.
5. The maximum amount of time any building permit may be extended shall be a total of three
(3) years. At the end of any three (3) year period starting from the original date of permit
issuance, the permit shall become null and void and a new building permit shall be required,
with full permit fees, in order for the applicant to complete work. The voiding of the prior
permit shall negate all previous vesting of zoning or Building codes. Whenever an appeal is
filed and a necessary development approval is stayed in accordance with ECDC 20.06.030 the
time limit periods imposed under this section shall also be stayed until final decision.
6. The building official may reject requests for permit extension where he determines that
modifications or amendments to the applicable zoning and Building codes have occurred
since the original issuance of the permit and/or modifications or amendments would
significantly promote public health and safety if applied to the project through the issuance of
a new permit.
L. Repealed by Ord. 3926.
M. Section 107.3.3, Phased Approval, is amended to read:
1. The building official may issue partial permits for phased construction as part of a
development before the entire plans and specifications for the whole building or structure
have been approved provided architectural design board approval has been granted and a fully
complete permit application for the entire building or structure has been submitted for review.
2. Phased approval means permits for grading, shoring, and foundation may be issued
separately, provided concurrent approval is granted by the planning manager, city engineer
and fire marshal, when applicable. No phased approval permit shall be issued unless approved
civil plans detailing the construction of all site improvements including, but not limited to:
curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paved streets, water lines, sewer lines, and storm drainage have been
signed as approved by the city engineer.
3. With such phased approval, a performance bond shall be posted with the city pursuant to
Chapter 17.10 ECDC, to cover the estimated cost of construction to city standards for the
improvements.
N. Section 113, Board of Appeals, is deleted and replaced by Chapter 19.80 ECDC.
O. Section 202, the definition of HIGH-RISE BUILDING, is amended to read:
HIGH-RISE BUILDING. A building with an occupied floor or rooftop located more than 75
feet (22,860 mm) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access.
P. Section 502.1, Address Identification, is amended to read:
Approved numbers or addresses shall be installed by the property owner for new and existing
buildings in such a position as to be clearly visible and legible from the street or roadway
fronting the property. Letters or numbers on the building shall be a minimum six (6) inches in
height and stroke a minimum of .75 inch of a contrasting color to the building base color.
Where public or private access is provided and the building address cannot be viewed from
the public way, a monument, pole or other approved sign or means shall be used to identify
the structure. This means of premises identification does not preclude approved identification
also affixed to structure.
Q. Section 903.2 is amended to read:
Packet Pg. 293
7.4.a
Where Required. Approved automatic fire sprinkler systems in new buildings and structures
shall be provided in the locations described in Sections 903.2.1 through 903.2.13.
R. Section 903.2.13 is added to read:
Automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be provided as required by ECDC 19.25.035A.
S. Section 903.3.7 is amended to read:
Fire department connections shall be installed in accordance with Section 912 and ECDC
19.25.035B.
T. Section 907.2 is amended to read:
Where required —New buildings and structures. An approved fire alarm system installed in
accordance with this code and NFPA 72 shall be provided in new buildings and structures in
accordance with Sections 907.2.1 through 907.2.24 and provide occupant notification in
accordance with Section 907.5, unless other requirements are provided by another section of
this code.
U. Section 907.2.24 is added to read:
Fire alarm and detection system shall be provided as required by ECDC 19.25.035C.
V. Section 1608.1, General, is amended to read:
Design snow loads shall be determined in accordance with Chapter 7 of ASCE 7, but the
design roof load shall not be less than that determined by Section 1607, or 25 pounds per
square foot, whichever is greater.
W. Section 3108.1.1, Radio, Television and Cellular Communication Related Equipment and Devices, is added and
reads:
A permit shall be required for the installation or relocation of commercial radio, television or
cellular tower support structures including monopoles, whip antennas, panel antennas,
parabolic antennas and related accessory equipment, and accessory equipment shelters
(regardless of size) including roof mounted equipment shelters.
X. Section 3109.2, Applicability and Maintenance, is added and reads:
1. Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas of all occupancies shall comply with the requirements
of this section and other applicable sections of this code.
2. It is the responsibility of the owner to maintain a swimming pool, hot tub or spa in a clean
and sanitary condition and all equipment shall be maintained in a satisfactory operating
condition when the swimming pool, hot tub or spa is in use. A swimming pool, hot tub or spa
that is neglected, not secured from public entry and/or not maintained in a clean and sanitary
condition or its equipment in accord with manufacturers recommendations shall be
determined to be a hazard to health and safety and shall be properly mitigated to the
satisfaction of the building official.
Y. Section 3109.3, Location and Setbacks, is added and reads:
Swimming pools, hot tubs and spas shall meet requirements of the zoning code of the city of
Edmonds.
1. Minimum setbacks are measured from property lines to the inside face of the pool, hot tub
or spa as required by the zoning code for accessory structures.
Packet Pg. 294
7.4.a
2. All other accessory buildings and equipment shall meet the normally required setbacks for
accessory structures in the zone in which they are located.
Z. Section 3109.4, Tests and Cross -Connection Devices, is added and reads:
1. All swimming pool, hot tub and spa piping shall be inspected and approved before being
covered or concealed.
2. Washington State Department of Health approved cross connection devices are required to
be provided on potable water systems when used to fill any swimming pool, hot tub or spa.
AA. Section 3109.5, Wastewater Disposal, is added and reads:
A means of disposal of the total contents of the swimming pool, hot tub or spa (including
partial or periodic emptying) shall be reviewed and approved by the public works director.
1. No direct connection shall be made between any swimming pool, hot tub or spa to any
storm drain, city sewer main, drainage system, seepage pit, underground leaching pit, or
sub -soil drain.
2. A sanitary tee (outside cleanout installed on the main building side sewer line) shall be
provided for draining of treated water into the city sanitary sewer system.
BB. Section 3109.9, Inspection Requirements, is added and reads:
The appropriate city inspector shall be notified for the following applicable inspections:
1. Footing, wall, pre -form, pre-gunite, erosion control, underground plumbing, sanitary
extension and cleanout, mechanical pool equipment, gas piping, mechanical enclosure
location, cross connection and final inspection.
2. An initial cross connection control installation inspection is required by the city cross
connection control specialist prior to final installation approval.
3. All backflow assemblies shall be tested by state certified backflow assembly testers upon
initial installation and then annually thereafter. Copies of all test reports shall be submitted to
the city water division for review and approval.
CC. Appendix E, Accessibility Requirements, is amended by deleting Sections E107, E108, El 10 and El 11.
DD. Appendix H, Signs, is amended as follows:
1. Section H101.2, Signs exempt from permits, is replaced by subsection (E)(1)(p) of this
section.
2. Section H101.2.1, Prohibited signs, is added and reads as follows:
a. It is unlawful for any person to advertise or display any visually communicated message, by
letter or pictorially, of any kind on any seating bench, or in direct connection with any bench.
b. All signs not expressly permitted by Chapter 20.60 ECDC.
c. Signs which the city engineer determines to be a hazard to vehicle or pedestrian traffic
because they resemble or obscure a traffic control device, or pose a hazard to a pedestrian
walkway or because they obscure visibility needed for safe traffic passage. Such signs shall be
immediately removed at the request of the city engineer.
Packet Pg. 295
7.4.a
d. All signs which are located within a public right-of-way and that have been improperly
posted or displayed are hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be subject to
immediate removal and confiscation per ECDC 20.60.090.
3. Sections H104, Identification, H106.1.1, Internally illuminated signs, H107, Combustible
materials, H108, Animated devices, H109.1, Height restrictions, and H110, Roof signs, are
deleted.
[Ord. 4212 § 1 (Att. A), 2021; Ord. 4199 § 4 (Att. D), 2020; Ord. 4154 § 9 (Att. D), 2019;
Ord. 4111 § 2 (Exh. 2), 2018; Ord. 4029 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 4026 § 2 (Att. B), 2016;
Ord. 3926 § 1 (Exh. A), 2013; Ord. 3845 § 6, 2011; Ord. 3796 § 1, 2010].
Section 19.07.110 Variance.
A. General. The variance criteria set forth in this section are based on the general principle of zoning law that
variances pertain to a piece of property and are not personal in nature. A variance may be granted by the city's
floodplain administrator for a parcel of property with physical characteristics so unusual that complying with the
requirements of this chapter would create an exceptional hardship to the applicant or the surrounding property
owners. The characteristics must be unique to the property and not be shared by adjacent parcels. The unique
characteristic must pertain to the land itself, not to the structure, its inhabitants, or the property owners.
It is the duty of the city of Edmonds to help protect its ^fin residents from flooding. This need is so compelling
and the implications of the cost of insuring a structure built below the base flood elevation are so serious that
variances from the flood elevation or from other requirements in the flood ordinance are quite rare. The long-term
goal of preventing and reducing flood loss and damage can only be met if variances are strictly limited. Therefore,
the variance guidelines provided in this chapter are more detailed and contain multiple provisions that must be met
before a variance can be properly granted. The criteria are designed to screen out those situations in which
alternatives other than a variance are more appropriate.
B. Requirements for Variances.
1. Variances shall only be issued:
a. Upon a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional
threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of
the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances;
b. For the repair, rehabilitation, or restoration of historic structures upon a determination that the proposed
repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure and
the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure;
c. Upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to
afford relief,
d. Upon a showing of good and sufficient cause;
e. Upon a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the
applicant;
f. Upon a showing that the use cannot perform its intended purpose unless it is located or carried out in
close proximity to water. This includes only facilities defined in ECDC 19.07.020 in the definition of
"Functionally dependent use."
2. Generally, variances may be issued for new construction and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot
of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below
the BFE, provided the provisions of this chapter have been fully considered. As the lot size increases beyond
one-half acre, the technical justification required for issuing the variance increases.
Packet Pg. 296
7.4.a
C. Variance Criteria. In considering variance applications, the floodplain administrator shall consider all technical
evaluations, all relevant factors, all standards specified in other sections of this chapter, and:
1. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others;
2. The danger to life and property due to flooding or erosion damage;
3. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on
the individual owner;
4. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community;
5. The necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable;
6. The availability of alternative locations for the proposed use, which are not subject to flooding or erosion
damage;
7. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development;
8. The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for that
area;
9. The safety of access to the property in time of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles;
10. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at
the site; and
11. The costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and
repair of public utilities and facilities, such as sewer, gas, electrical, water system, and streets and bridges.
D. Additional Requirements for the Issuance of a Variance.
1. Any applicant to whom a variance is granted shall be given written notice over the signature of a community
official that:
a. The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the BFE will result in increased premium rates
for flood insurance coverage; and
b. Such construction below the BFE increases risks to life and property.
2. The floodplain administrator shall maintain a record of all variance actions, including justification for their
issuance.
3. The floodplain administrator shall condition the variance as needed to ensure that the requirements and
criteria of this chapter are met.
4. Variances as interpreted in the NFIP are based on the general zoning law principle that they pertain to a
physical piece of property; they are not personal in nature and do not pertain to the structure, its inhabitants,
economic or financial circumstances. They primarily address small lots in densely populated residential
neighborhoods. As such, variances from flood elevations should be quite rare.
E. Appeals. Appeals of a variance from the provisions of this chapter shall be appealable in accordance with Chapter
19.80 ECDC. [Ord. 4199 § 1 (Att. A), 2020].
Packet Pg. 297
7.4.a
Section 20.05.020 General requirements.
A. Review. The hearing examiner shall review and decide on conditional use permit applications as Type III-B
decisions as set forth in ECDC 20.01.003.
B. Appeals. The hearing examiner decisions on conditional use permit shall be appealable to the city council in
accordance with Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
C. Time Limit. Unless the owner obtains a building permit or, if no building permit is required, substantially
commences the use allowed within one year from the date of approval, the conditional use permit shall expire and be
null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of time before the expiration date.
D. Review of Extension Application. An application for any extension of time shall be reviewed by the amity
development dire,.to planning and development director as a Type II decision.
E. Location. A conditional use permit applies only to the property for which it has been approved and may not be
transferred to any other property.
F. Denial. A conditional use permit application may be denied if the proposal cannot be conditioned so that the
required findings can be made. [Ord. 4154 § 12 (Att. D), 2019; Ord. 3783 § 7, 2010; Ord. 3775 § 7, 2010; Ord. 3736
§ 37, 2009; Ord. 2270 § 1, 1982].
Section 20.12.020 Design review by the architectural design board.
A. Public Hearing — Phase 1. Phase 1 of the public hearing shall be scheduled with the architectural design board
(ADB) as a public meeting. Notice of the meeting shall be provided according to the requirements of ECDC
20.03.003. This notice may be combined with the formal notice of application required under ECDC 20.03.002, as
appropriate.
1. The purpose of Phase 1 of the public hearing is for the ADB to identify the relative importance of design
criteria that will apply to the project proposal during the subsequent design review. The basic criteria to be
evaluated are listed on the design guidelines checklist contained within the design guidelines and this chapter.
The ADB shall utilize the urban design guidelines and standards contained in the relevant city zoning
classification(s), any relevant district -specific design objectives contained in the comprehensive plan, and the
relevant portions of this chapter and Chapter 20.13 ECDC, to identify the relative importance of design criteria;
no new, additional criteria shall be incorporated, whether proposed in light of the specific characteristics of a
particular tract of land or on an ad hoc basis.
2. Prior to scheduling Phase 1 of the public hearing, the applicant shall submit information necessary to identify
the scope and context of the proposed development, including any site plans, diagrams, and/or elevations
sufficient to summarize the character of the project, its site, and neighboring property information. At a
minimum, an applicant shall submit the following information for consideration during Phase 1 of the public
hearing:
a. Vicinity plan showing all significant physical structures and environmentally critical areas within a
200-foot radius of the site including, but not limited to, surrounding building outlines, streets, driveways,
sidewalks, bus stops, and land use. Aerial photographs may be used to develop this information.
b. Conceptual site plan(s) showing topography (minimum two -foot intervals), general location of
building(s), areas devoted to parking, streets and access, existing open space and vegetation. All concepts
being considered for the property should be submitted to assist the ADB in defining all pertinent issues
applicable to the site.
c. Three-dimensional sketches, photo simulations, or elevations that depict the volume of the proposed
structure in relation to the surrounding buildings and improvements.
3. During Phase 1 of the public hearing, the applicant shall be afforded an opportunity to present information
on the proposed project. The public shall also be invited to address which design guidelines checklist criteria
Packet Pg. 298
7.4.a
from ECDC 20.12.070 they feel are pertinent to the project. The Phase 1 meeting shall be considered to be a
public hearing and information presented or discussed during the meeting shall be recorded as part of the
hearing record.
4. Prior to the close of Phase 1 of the public hearing, the ADB shall identify the specific design guidelines
checklist criteria — and their relative importance — that will be applied to the project during the project's
subsequent design review. In submitting an application for design review approval under this chapter, the
applicant shall be responsible for identifying how the proposed project meets the specific criteria identified by
the ADB during Phase 1 of the public hearing.
5. Following establishment of the design guidelines checklist, the public hearing shall be continued to a date
certain, not exceeding 120 days from the date of Phase 1 of the public hearing. The continuance is intended to
provide the applicant with sufficient time to prepare the material required for Phase 24 of the public hearing,
including any design or redesign needed to address the input of the public and ADB during Phase 1 of the
public hearing by complying with the prioritized checklist.
6. Because Phase 1 of the public hearing is only the first part of a two-part public hearing, there can be no
appeal of the design decision until Phase 2 of the public hearing has been completed and a final decision
rendered.
B. Continued Public Hearing — Phase 2.
1. An applicant for Phase 2 design review shall submit information sufficient to evaluate how the project meets
the criteria identified by the ADB during Phase 1 of the public hearing described in subsection (A) of this
section. At a minimum, an applicant shall submit the following information for consideration during Phase 2 of
the public hearing:
a. Conceptual site plan showing topography (minimum two -foot intervals), general layout of building,
parking, streets and access, and proposed open space.
b. Conceptual landscape plan, showing locations of planting areas identifying landscape types, including
general plant species and characteristics.
c. Conceptual utility plan, showing access to and areas reserved for water, sewer, storm, electrical power,
and fire connections and/or hydrants.
d. Conceptual building elevations for all building faces illustrating building massing and openings,
materials and colors, and roof forms. A three-dimensional model may be substituted for the building
elevation(s).
e. If more than one development concept is being considered for the property, the submissions should be
developed to clearly identify the development options being considered.
f. An annotated checklist demonstrating how the project complies with the specific criteria identified by
the ADB.
g. Optional: generalized building floor plans may be provided.
2. Staff shall prepare a report summarizing the project and providing any comments or recommendations
regarding the annotated checklist provided by the applicant under subsection (B)(1)(f) of this section, as
appropriate. The report shall be mailed to the applicant and ADB, at least one week prior to the public hearing.
3. Phase 2 of the public hearing shall be conducted by the ADB as a continuation of the Phase 1 public hearing.
Notice of the meeting shall be provided according to the requirements of Chapter 20.03 ECDC. During Phase 2
of the public hearing, the ADB shall review the application and identify any conditions that the proposal must
meet prior to the issuance of any permit or approval by the city. When conducting this review, the ADB shall
enter the following findings prior to issuing its decision on the proposal:
Packet Pg. 299
7.4.a
a. Zoning Ordinance. The proposal meets the bulk and use requirements of the zoning ordinance, or a
variance or modification has been approved under the terms of this code for any duration. The finding of
the staff that a proposal meets the bulk and use requirements of the zoning ordinance shall be given
substantial deference and may be overcome by clear and convincing evidence.
b. Design Objectives. The proposal meets the relevant district -specific design objectives contained in the
comprehensive plan.
c. Design Criteria. The proposal satisfies the specific checklist criteria identified by the ADB during Phase
1 of the public hearing under subsection (A) of this section. When conducting its review, the ADB shall
not add or impose conditions based on new, additional criteria proposed in light of the specific
characteristics of a particular tract of land or on an ad hoc basis.
4. Project Consolidation. Projects may be consolidated in accordance with RCW 36.70B.110 and the terms of
the Edmonds Community Development Code.
C. Effect of the Decision of the ADB. The decision of the ADB described in subsection (B) of this section shall be
used by staff to determine if a project complies with the requirements of these chapters during staff review of any
subsequent applications for permits or approvals. The staff s determination shall be purely ministerial in nature and
no discretion is granted to deviate from the requirements imposed by the ADB and the Edmonds Community
Development Code. The staff process shall be akin to and administered in conjunction with building permit
approval, as applicable. Written notice shall be provided to any party of record (as developed in Phases 1 and 2 of
the public hearing) who formally requests notice as to:
1. Receipt of plans in a building permit application or application for property development as defined in
ECDC 20.10.020; and
2. Approval, conditioned approval or denial by staff of the building permit or development approval. [Ord.
4302 § 4 (Att. A), 2023; Ord. 3817 § 10, 2010; Ord. 3736 §§ 43, 44, 2009; Ord. 3636 § 3, 2007].
20.15A.220 SEPA decisions — Substantive authority.
A. The city may attach conditions to a permit or approval for a proposal so long as:
1. Such conditions are necessary to mitigate specific probable adverse environmental impacts clearly identified
in an environmental document prepared pursuant to this chapter; and
2. Such conditions are in writing; and
3. The mitigation measures included in such conditions are reasonable and capable of being accomplished; and
4. The city has considered whether other local, state or federal mitigation measures applied to the proposal are
sufficient to mitigate the identified impacts; and
5. Such conditions are based on one or more policies in subsection (C) of this section or ECDC 20.15A.230 and
cited in the permit, approval, license or other decision document.
B. The city may deny a permit or approval for a proposal on the basis of SEPA so long as:
1. A finding is made that approving the proposal would result in probable significant adverse environmental
impacts that are identified in a final EIS or final supplemental EIS prepared pursuant to this chapter; and
2. A finding is made that there are no reasonable mitigation measures sufficient to mitigate the identified
impact; and
3. The denial is based on one or more policies identified in subsection (C) of this section or in ECDC
20.15A.230 and identified in writing in the decision document.
Packet Pg. 300
7.4.a
C. The city designates and adopts by reference the following policies as the basis for the city's exercise of authority
pursuant to this section:
1. The city shall use all practicable means, consistent with other essential considerations of state policy, to
improve and coordinate plans, functions, programs, and resources to the end that the state and its e-ilizen
residents may:
a. Fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations;
b. Assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive, and aesthetically and culturally pleasing
surroundings;
c. Attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or
safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences;
d. Preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage;
e. Maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice;
f. Achieve a balance between population and resource use which will permit high standards of living and
wide sharing of life's amenities; and
g. Enhance the quality of renewable resources and approach the maximum attainable recycling of
depletable resources.
2. The city recognizes that each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment and
that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment.
[Ord. 3818 § 1, 2010].
Section 20.15A.290 Fees.
A. The city shall require the following fees for its activities in accordance with the provisions of this chapter:
1. Threshold Determination. For every environmental checklist the city reviews as lead agency, the city shall
collect a fee set by Chapter-ECDC 15.00.020 from the proponent of the proposal prior to undertaking the
threshold determination. This fee may be waived as provided therein. The time periods provided by this chapter
from making a threshold determination shall not begin to run until fee has been paid or waived in writing by the
responsible official. When the city assists the applicant or completes the environmental checklist at the
applicant's request under ECDC 20.15A.120(C), an additional fee equal to the estimated actual cost of
providing the assistance shall be collected.
2. Environmental Impact Statement.
a. When the city is the lead agency for a proposal requiring an EIS and the responsible official determines
that the EIS shall be prepared by employees of the city, the city may charge and collect a reasonable fee
from any applicant to cover costs incurred, including overhead, by the city in preparing the EIS. The
responsible official shall advise the applicant of the projected costs for the EIS prior to actual preparation.
b. The responsible official may determine that the city will contract directly with a consultant for
preparation of an EIS, or a portion of the EIS, for activities initiated by some persons or entity other than
the city and may bill such costs and expenses directly to the applicant. Such consultants shall be selected
by mutual agreement of the city and applicant after a call for proposals.
c. The applicant shall pay the projected amount to the city prior to commencing work. The city will refund
the excess, if any, at the completion of the EIS. If the city's cost exceeds the projected costs, the applicant
shall immediately pay the excess. If a proposal is modified so that an EIS is no longer required, the
Packet Pg. 301
7.4.a
responsible official shall refund any fees collected under subsection (13)(1) or (2) of this section which
remain after incurred costs, including overhead, are paid.
3. The city may collect a reasonable fee from an applicant to cover the cost of meeting the public notice
requirements of this chapter relating to the applicant's proposal.
4. The city shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency.
5. The city may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under this chapter, and for mailing the
document, in a manner provided by Chapter 42.17 RCW. [Ord. 3818 § 1, 2010].
Section 20.16.080 Decision criteria — EPFs proposed by a regional agency with jurisdiction.
An application for conditional use permit approval for an essential public facility proposed by a regional agency
with jurisdiction shall additionally or alternatively, as applicable, comply with the following site decision criteria:
A. The project sponsor has established that it is a regional agency with jurisdiction. For the purpose of this chapter,
"jurisdiction" shall mean within the boundaries of a regional agency's legal and physical jurisdiction as determined
by the laws of the state of Washington or its charter. A claim of jurisdiction based upon service area shall meet the
following criteria:
1. The project must serve a significant share of the Edmonds population or a significant portion of the land area
of the city of Edmonds must lie within the regional agency service area; and
2. The proposed site must reasonably serve the project's overall service population and the service population
or service area lying within the city of Edmonds.
B. The site has been designated through a collaborative process which involved representatives of the city of
Edmonds, duly appointed by the city, and through a public hearing process which was reasonably calculated to reach
the eitize esidents of the city of Edmonds. [Ord. 3572 § 1, 2005; Ord. 3474 § 1, 2003].
Section 20.18.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide an informational process supplemental to state licensing and regulatory
procedures to inform the ^residents of residential neighborhoods when group homes are established and
operated within their boundaries. [Ord. 3184 § 3, 1998].
Section 20.30.020 Review.
The conunt it y development dire^*^r planning and development director shall review applications for joint use of
parking as a Type II decision (Staff decision — Notice required) using the criteria of this chapter as a basis for
review. [Ord. 3736 § 55, 2009].
20.30.050 Loss of joint use.
A. Alternate Sites. Applicant shall not allow or voluntarily participate in the loss of rights of joint use. In the event
applicant should for reasons beyond applicant's control lose applicant's rights of joint use, applicant shall have 90
days to secure on -site parking to conform to the parking requirements of this code, or secure another site for joint
use for which a new application must be submitted under the terms of this chapter.
Packet Pg. 302
7.4.a
portion of the use eatising the paFking defieieney, within the said oFiginal 90 day peFiod. Of, in the ,
within said 90 day period applioant may pay an in lieu of par -king fee ttndeF ECDC 17.50.070.
B.E Discontinuance of Use. If applicant cannot or will not provide parking, , as set forth in
subsections A an n ��, the applicant will discontinue the use, or that portion of use causing the parking
deficiency within the original 90-day period set forth above.
Section 20.50.010 Purpose.
A. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate the placement, construction, modification and appearance of wireless
communication facilities, in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public, while not unreasonably
interfering with the deployment of competitive wireless communication facilities throughout the city. The purpose
of this chapter may be achieved through adherence to the following objectives:
1. Protect residential areas and land uses from potential adverse impacts that wireless communication facilities
might create, including but not limited to negative impacts on aesthetics, environmentally sensitive areas,
historically significant locations, flight corridors, and health and safety of persons and property;
2. Establishment of clear and nondiscriminatory local regulations concerning wireless communication facilities
and services that are consistent with federal and state laws and regulations;
3. Encourage providers of wireless communication facilities to locate facilities, to the extent feasible, in areas
where the adverse impact on the public health, safety and welfare is minimal;
4. For macro facilities, encourage the location of those facilities in nonresidential areas and allow macro
facilities in residential areas only when necessary to meet functional requirements of the communications
industry as defined by the Federal Communications Commission;
5. Minimize the total number of macro facilities in residential areas;
6. Encourage and, where legally permissible, require cooperation between competitors and, as a primary option,
joint use of new and existing towers, tower sites and suitable structures to the greatest extent possible, where
doing so would significantly reduce or eliminate additional negative impact on the city;
7. Ensure wireless communication facilities are configured in a way that minimizes the adverse visual impact of
the facilities, as viewed from different vantage points, through careful design, landscape screening, minimal
impact siting options and camouflaging techniques, dispersion of unscreened features to lessen the visual
impact upon any one location, and through assessment of innovative siting techniques;
8. Enable wireless communication companies to enter into lease agreements with the city to use city property
for the placement of wireless facilities, where consistent with other public needs, as a means to generate
revenue for the city;
9. Balance the city's intent to minimize the adverse impacts of wireless communication facilities with the
ability of the providers of communications services to deploy such services to the community quickly,
effectively and efficiently;
10. Provide for the prompt removal of wireless communication facilities that are abandoned or no longer
inspected for safety concerns and building code compliance, and provide a mechanism for the city to cause
these abandoned wireless communication facilities to be removed as necessary to protect the oil residents
from imminent harm and danger;
11. Avoid potential damage to people and adjacent properties from tower failure and falling equipment, through
strict compliance with state building and electrical codes; and
12. Disperse the adverse impacts of small wireless facility facilities as evenly as possible throughout the
community, especially when joint use does not eliminate additional visual impact.
Packet Pg. 303
7.4.a
B. In furtherance of these objectives, the city shall give due consideration to the zoning code, existing land uses, and
environmentally sensitive areas when approving sites for the location of wireless communication facilities.
C. These objectives were developed to protect the public health, safety and welfare, to protect property values, and
to minimize and disperse visual impact, while furthering the development of enhanced communications services in
the city. These objectives were designed to comply with the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and its implementing
regulations. The provisions of this chapter are not intended to and any ambiguities herein shall not be interpreted in
such a manner that would materially inhibit the deployment of wireless communication facilities. This chapter shall
not be applied in such a manner as to unreasonably discriminate between providers of functionally equivalent
wireless facilities.
D. To the extent that any provision of this chapter is inconsistent or conflicts with any other city ordinance, this
chapter shall control. Otherwise, this chapter shall be construed consistently with the other provisions and
regulations of the city.
E. In reviewing any application to place, construct or modify wireless communication facilities, the city shall act
within federally required time periods. Any decision to deny an application shall be in writing, supported by
substantial evidence contained in a written record. The city shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the
application in accordance with this title, this chapter, the adopted Edmonds comprehensive plan, and other
applicable ordinances and regulations. [Ord. 4147 § 2 (Att. A), 2019; Ord. 3961 § 1, 2014; Ord. 3845 § 2 (Att. A),
2011].
Section 20.60.020 General regulations for permanent signs.
A. Sign Area. The area of a sign shall be calculated as follows:
1. The area of a sign is maximum actual area of a sign that is visible from any single point of observation
from any public vantage point. The sign area is normally the smallest rectangle that encloses the entire copy
area of the sign.
2. Individual letters, numbers or symbols applied directly to a wall or structure and used to form the sign shall
be calculated individually.
3. Supporting structures which are part of a sign display shall be included in the calculation of the sign area,
except that the supporting structure of a monument sign or pole sign shall not be included when calculating
the sign area.
141 ?C
STORE
NAME] I
Left: Sign area = X * Y Right: Applied individual letters are calculated separately.
Packet Pg. 304
7.4.a
Monument sign: The base is not included in the calculation of sign area (dashed rectangle).
B. When located on a wall or mansard roof, no sign may extend above the highest point of the wall or mansard roof
when the mansard roof is on a one-story building. Other than a mansard roof on a one-story building, a sign may not
be attached above the eave or drip line on a pitched roof.
C. Except for pole -mounted community event banners, no sign or any part of a sign may be designed or constructed
to be moving by any means and shall not contain items such as banners, ribbons, streamers and spinners. Signs with
type that is movable to change the message (reader boards) are allowed, subject to the specific requirements detailed
elsewhere in this chapter.
D. Signs that extend into or over a public right-of-way shall comply with Chapter 18.70 ECDC.
E. Exposed braces and angle irons are prohibited unless they are part of a decorative design that is integral to the
design of the sign. Guywires are prohibited unless there are no other practical means of supporting the sign.
F. No sign shall have blinking, flashing, fluttering or moving lights or other illuminating device which has a
changing light density or color; provided, however, temperature and/or time signs that conform in all other respects
to this chapter are allowed. Electronic reader boards may have messages that change; however, moving messages
are not allowed. Messages that change at intervals less than 20 seconds will be considered blinking or flashing and
not allowed.
G. No light source which exceeds 20 watts shall be directly exposed to any public street or adjacent property.
H. No illumination source of fluorescent light shall exceed 425 milliamps or be spaced closer than eight inches on
center.
I. No commercial sign shall be illuminated after 11:00 p.m. unless the commercial enterprise is open for business
and then may remain on only as long as the enterprise is open.
J. No window signs above the first floor shall be illuminated.
K. Sign height shall be determined as follows:
1. For attached signs, sign height is the vertical distance from the highest point on the sign to the average
finished grade.
Packet Pg. 305
7.4.a
2. For freestanding signs, sign height is the vertical distance from the highest point of the sign area or its
support to the average elevation of the finished grade at the base of the supports.
L. Portable signs may not be used as permanent signage; only fixed signs are permitted.
M. The following matrix summarizes the types of signs permitted in each neighborhood/district within the city:
Sign Type
Downtown'
SR-992
Westgate/SR-1043
Neighborhood
Commercial
(BN, BP and
FVMU Zones)
Business Uses in
RM Zones
Wall -Mounted
P
P
P
P
P
Monument
C
P
P
C
C
Pole
N
P
N
N
N
Projecting
P
P
P
P
P
Internal Illumination
C
P
P
C
N
Reader Boards
C
C
C
C
C
Individual Letters
P
P
P
P
P
Boxed Cabinet
N
P
C
C
N
Building ID
P
P
P
P
P
Pedestrian
P
N
N
N
N
Wall Graphics
C
C
C
C
C
1 Downtown includes all properties within the downtown activity center defined in the comprehensive plan.
2 SR-99 includes all properties within the medical/Highway 99 activity center and the Highway 99 corridor
defined in the comprehensive plan.
s Westgate/SR-104 includes all properties within the Westgate corridor, the Edmonds Way corridor, and within
the Westgate community commercial area, as defined in the comprehensive plan.
Note: In the above table, P = Permitted; N = Not permitted; C = Conditionally permitted through design review if
consistent with the standards itemized in subsection (N) of this section.
N. The following standards clarify how some signs identified as "conditionally permitted" must be installed to be
permitted in the city of Edmonds:
1. Monument signs over six feet in height must be reviewed to ensure that the materials, colors, design and
proportions proposed are consistent with those used throughout the site.
2. Internally illuminated signs in the downtown area and neighborhood commercial areas may only light the
letters or logos/symbols. The background of a sign face may not be illuminated.
Packet Pg. 306
7.4.a
3. Intemally illuminated signs in the downtown area and the neighborhood commercial areas must be
mounted on the wall of the building. They may not be mounted on or under an attached awning.
4. Intemally illuminated signs that use exposed neon may only be located in the interior of buildings in the
downtown area and the neighborhood commercial areas.
5. Internally illuminated signs in the downtown area shall not be permitted to be higher than 14 feet in height.
6. Reader board messages are limited to alphanumeric messages only.
7. Reader boards are only permitted for public uses or places of public assembly. Public uses and places of
assembly include, but are not limited to, schools and churches as well as local and regional public facilities.
8. The background color of a boxed cabinet sign face must be coordinated with and complement the colors
used on the building.
9. The background color of a boxed cabinet sign face must be opaque and not allow any internal illumination
to shine through. [Ord. 4064 § 1 (Att. A), 2017; Ord. 4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3631 § 2, 2007; Ord. 3461
§ 2, 20031.
Section 20.60.100 Administration.
A. General. The eafn .tmity development dir-e ^*^r planning and development director is responsible for
administering and enforcing the provisions of this chapter. He or she shall adopt application requirements for sign
permits. Fees shall be as stated in Chapter ECDC 15.00.020.
B. Installation Permits. Many signs require installation permits under Chapter 19.45 ECDC and may require plan
checking fees as well.
C. Notice of Violation. Whenever the planning director becomes aware of a violation of the provisions of this
chapter, the planning director shall cause a notice to be sent to the alleged violator informing him or her of the
violation, the applicable code section, and a time within which to remedy the violation. The notice shall also advise
of the penalties for continued violation of the code as specified in this chapter. If the violation has not been corrected
within the time limit specified, the planning director shall refer the matter to the city attorney's office for institution
of appropriate legal action.
D. Penalty. Any person violating any provision of this code shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof shall be punished by a fine of $25.00 for each day of continued violation. [Ord. 4064 § 1 (Att. A), 2017; Ord.
4039 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3461 § 2, 2003].
Section 20.75.040 Application.
planing and development department. A subdivision application will be processed concurrently with any
applications for rezones, variances, planned unit developments, site plan approvals and other similar approvals that
relate to the proposed subdivision, unless the applicant expressly requests sequential processing. The application
shall contain the following items in addition to those specified in ECDC 20.02.002:
A. n r-eprediieible eapy of t The preliminary plat; and the ., mbor of pr-ints r-equir-ed by the pla* ;a.. an
development depar-tMent;
Packet Pg. 307
7.4.a
B. Title report;
C. A survey map, if required by the planning and development director, of the exterior boundaries of the land to be
subdivided, prepared by, and bearing the seal and signature of, a professional land surveyor registered in the state of
Washington. This map can be combined with the preliminary plat at the applicant's option;
D. The application fee as set in ChapteF 15.00 ECDC 15.00.020;
E. A proposal for dedication of park land rather than payment of in -lieu fees, if desired by the applicant;
F. Source of water supply and name of supplier;
G. Method of sewage disposal, and name of municipal system if applicable. Percolation rates and other information
required by the public works department shall be submitted if septic tanks are to be used;
H. Other information that may be required by the planning and development director in order to properly review the
proposed subdivision, including information needed to determine the environmental impact of the proposal. [Ord.
4299 § 54 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019; Ord. 4070 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2017; Ord. 3736 § 62, 2009; Ord.
2379 § 1, 19831.
Section 20.75.050 Lot line adjustment — Application.
A. Lot Line Adjustment Defined. A lot line adjustment is an alteration of lot lines between platted or unplatted lots
or both, which does not create any additional lot, tract, parcel, site or division.
B. Lot Line Adjustment Exempt from Subdivision Review. Except as otherwise provided in this section, lot
adjustments shall not be subject to the provisions of this chapter.
C. Lot Line Adjustment Review. All proposals for lot line adjustments shall be submitted to the Edmonds planning
manager or his/her designee for approval. The Edmonds planning manager or his/her designee shall approve the
proposed lot line adjustment unless the manager or his/her designee certifies in writing that the proposed adjustment
will:
1. Create a new lot, tract, parcel, site or division;
2. Reduce the setbacks of existing structures below the minimum required by code or make existing
nonconforming setbacks of existing structures more nonconforming than before;
3. Reduce the lot width or lot size below the minimum required for the applicable zone;
4. Transform a nonbuildable lot, tract, parcel, site or division into a buildable lot, tract, parcel, site or division;
5. Would otherwise result in a lot which is in violation of any requirement of the ECDC.
D. Application. A lot line adjustment application shall be s4.hied o f ms provided by theeivy ara shall at a
minimum contain the following information:
1. One copy of dimensioned plans on the official city of Edmonds lot line adjustment f6m. The d Dimensioned
plans prepared and stamped by a professional land surveyor registered in the state of Washington and
shall conforming to city of Edmonds survey requirements, as promulgated by the Edmonds planning division.
Information on the plans shall include the following:
a. Legal descriptions of the existing lots and proposed lot line adjustment(s);
b. The location of all existing structures on the subject parcel(s), including dimensioned setback
information from all existing and proposed lot lines and ingress/egress easements;
Packet Pg. 308
7.4.a
c. Locations of all existing ingress/egress and utility easements;
d. Gross and net lot area for the original parcels and the proposed parcels (net gross lot area does not
include any lot area devoted to vehicular ingress/egress easements);
e. The existing zoning of the subject parcel(s);
f. Location of all existing driveways on the subject parcel(s); and
g. The lot lines of adjoining properties for a distance of at least 50 feet.
2. A title company certification which is not more than 30 calendar days old containing:
a. A legal description of the total parcel(s) sought to be adjusted;
b. A list of those individuals, corporations, or other entities holding an ownership interest in the parcel(s);
c. Any easements or restrictions affecting the property(ies) with a description, purpose and reference by
auditor's file number and/or recording number;
d. Any encumbrances on the property; and
e. Any delinquent taxes or assessments on the property.
E. Fee. The application fee shall be as set in Chapter 0 ECDC 15.00.020.
F. Expiration. An application for a lot line adjustment shall expire one year after a complete application has been
filed with the city. An extension up to an additional year may be granted by the Edmonds planning manager or
his/her designee upon a showing by the application of reasonable cause.
G. Review. A certified determination of the planning manager or his/her designee may be appealed to the hearing
examiner as a Type II decision as set forth in Chapter 20.06 ECDC. [Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019; Ord. 4070 § 1
(Exh. 1), 2017; Ord. 3736 § 63, 2009; Ord. 3211 § 1, 1998].
Section 20.75.065 Preliminary review.
A. Responsibility for Review. The planning and development director, or a designated planning staff member, is in
charge of administering the preliminary review of all subdivisions. The public works director and the fire
department, and other departments if needed, shall participate in preliminary review by appropriate
recommendations on subjects within their respective areas of expertise.
hearing,B. Notice of Hearing.
1. When the direetor of planning a -ad deveiopment has aeeepted a sobdivision for filing, he shall set a date of
and give notiee of the hearing as provided in ECDC 20.03.003, and by the fellowing for a formal
subdivision!
a. One publication in a newspaper of general circulation within Snohomish County pursuant to Chapter 1.03 EGC
and posting notiee in three eenspietious plaees within 300 feet of any portion ef the beffadafy of the proposed formal
subdivision iyisio net loss than 10 .,,fling ,lays prior- to the l,o.,ring
b. Mailing to a eity if a proposed formal subdivision is adjacent or within one mile of the city's boundary, or the
proposed subdivision would use the utilities of the city,
e. Mailing to the county if a proposed formal subdivision is adjacent to the city county botuidary.
d. Mailing te the Stme Department of Highwa�,s if a proposed formal subdivision is adjaeent to a state hig",a),
right of way.
Packet Pg. 309
7.4.a
nonlegal language.
C. Time Limits for Staff Review. Staff review shall be completed within 120 days from the date of filing.
D. Formal Subdivision Review. The hearing examiner shall review a formal subdivision as a Type III -A decision in
accordance with provisions of Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
E. Short Subdivisions — Staff Review. The director of planning and development shall review a short subdivision as
a Type II decision (Staff decision — Notice required).
F. Appeal of Staff Decision. Any person may appeal to the hearing examiner a Type II decision of the planning and
development director on a short subdivision under the procedure set forth in Chapter 20.06 ECDC. [Ord. 4299 § 57
(Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019; Ord. 4070 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2017; Ord. 3817 § 12, 2010; Ord. 3783 § 12,
2010; Ord. 3775 § 12, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 65, 2009; Ord. 3211 §§ 4, 5, 1998; Ord. 3112 §§ 17, 18, 19, 1996; Ord.
2379 § 2, 1983].
Section 20.75.085 Review criteria.
The following criteria shall be used to review proposed subdivisions:
A. Environmental.
1. Where environmental resources exist, such as trees, streams, ravines or wildlife habitats, the proposal shall
be designed to minimize significant adverse impacts to the resources. Permanent restrictions may be imposed
on the proposal to avoid impact.
2. The proposal shall be designed to minimize grading by using shared driveways and by relating street, house
site and lot placement to the existing topography.
3. Where conditions exist which could be hazardous to the future residents of the land to be divided, or to
nearby residents or property, such as floodplains, steep slopes or unstable soil or geologic conditions, a
subdivision of the hazardous land shall be denied unless the condition can be permanently corrected, consistent
with subsections (A)(1) and (2) of this section.
4. The proposal shall be designed to minimize off -site impacts on drainage, views and so forth.
B. Lot and Street Layout.
1. Lots shall be designed to contain a usable building area. If the building area would be difficult to develop,
the lot shall be redesigned or eliminated, unless special conditions can be imposed on the approval which will
ensure that the lot is developed properly.
2. Lots shall not front on highways, arterials or collector streets unless there is no other feasible access. Special
access provisions, such as shared driveways, turnarounds or frontage streets may be required to minimize
traffic hazards.
3. Each lot shall meet the applicable dimensional requirements of the zoning ordinance.
4. Pedestrian walks or bicycle paths shall be provided to serve schools, parks, public facilities, shorelines and
streams where street access is not adequate.
C. Dedications.
1. The city may require dedication of land in the proposed subdivision for public use.
Packet Pg. 310
7.4.a
2. Only the city council may approve a dedication of park land to satisfy the requirements of ECDC 20.75.090.
The council may request a review and written recommendation from the planning advisory board.
3. Any approval of a subdivision shall be conditioned on appropriate dedication of land for streets, including
those on the official street map and the preliminary plat.
D. Improvements.
1. Improvements which may be required, but are not limited to, streets, curbs, pedestrian walks and bicycle
paths, sidewalks, street landscaping, water lines, sewage systems, drainage systems and underground utilities.
2. The person or body approving a subdivision shall determine the improvements necessary to meet the
purposes and requirements of this chapter, and the requirements of.
a. ECDC Title 18, Public Works Requirements;
b. Chapter 19.25 ECDC, Fire Code, as to fire hydrants, water supply and access.
This determination shall be based on the recommendations of the planning and development director, the public
works director, and the fire chief.
3. The use of septic systems may be approved if all of the following conditions are met:
a. It is more than 200 feet, multiplied by the number of lots in the proposed subdivision, from the nearest
public sewer main to the nearest boundary of the land to be divided.
b. The land to be divided is zoned RS-20.
c. The public works director and eit`, health ^FF^^r Snohomish County health officer determine that soil,
drainage and slope conditions are satisfactory for septic use and that all requirements of WAC 248-96-090
are met.
E. Floodplain Management. All subdivision proposals shall comply with the criteria set forth in the Edmonds
Community Development Code for floodplain management. [Ord. 4299 § 58 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4154 § 4 (Aft. C),
2019; Ord. 4070 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2017; Ord. 3211 § 7, 1998; Ord. 2466, 1984].
20.75.090 Park land dedication.
A. Dedication or In -Lieu of Fee Required. Before or concurrent with the approval of the final plat of any
subdivision, the subdivider shall dedicate land, pay a fee in -lieu of dedication, or do a combination of both, for park
and recreational purposes.
B. Proposal of Dedication. Either the applicant or the city may propose dedication of a portion of the land to be
divided in order to meet the regulations of this section. Payment of in -lieu fees is required unless dedication is
proposed and approved.
C. Review of Dedications. Dedication proposals shall be reviewed at the same time as the subdivision proposal. Any
short subdivision containing a dedication proposal shall be reviewed as if it were a formal subdivision.
D. Factors for Review. Dedication proposals shall be reviewed for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, the
Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan, and the Recreational Walks Plan. Other factors to be considered include
size, usability and accessibility of the land proposed for dedication, and the possibility of coordinating dedication by
owners of adjacent land.
E. In -Lieu Fee. In -lieu park fees shall be as set in Chapter ECDC 15.00.020. [Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019;
Ord. 4070 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2017].
Packet Pg. 311
7.4.a
Section 20.75.110 Changes.
A. Preliminary Plats. The planning and development director may approve as a Type I decision minor changes to an
approved preliminary plat, or its conditions of approval. If the proposal involves additional lots, rearrangements of
lots or roads, additional impacts to surrounding property, or other major changes, the proposal shall be reviewed in
the same manner as the original application. Application fees shall be as set in GhapteF 15.00 ECDC 15.00.020.
B. Recorded Final Plats. An application to change a final plat that has been filed for record shall be processed in the
same manner as a new application. This section does not apply to affidavits of correction. [Ord. 4299 § 59 (Exh. A),
2023; Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019; Ord. 4070 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2017; Ord. 3736 § 66, 2009].
Section 20.75.130 Installation of improvements.
A. Timing and Inspection Fee. The applicant shall not begin installation of improvements until the public works
director has approved the improvement plans, the public works director and the applicant have agreed in writing on
a time schedule for installation of the improvements, and the applicant has paid an inspection fee, as set in Chapter
15.00 ECDC 15.00.020.
B. Completion — Bonding. The applicant shall either complete the improvements before the final plat is submitted
for city approval, or the applicant shall post a bond or other suitable surety to guarantee the completion of the
improvements within one year of the approval of the final plat. The bond or surety shall be based on the construction
cost of the improvement as determined by the director of public works, and shall be processed as provided in
Chapter 17.10 ECDC.
C. Acceptance — Maintenance Bond. The director of public works shall not accept the improvements for the city of
Edmonds until the improvements have been inspected and found satisfactory, and the applicant has posted a bond or
surety for 15 percent of the construction cost to guarantee against defects of workmanship and materials for two
years from the date of acceptance.
D. Short Subdivision — Deferred Installation. If the planning and development director determines that installation of
improvements will not be needed at the time of the approval of the final plat of the short subdivision, the
improvements shall be installed or guaranteed by bond before issuance of any development permit for any lot shown
on the preliminary plat. This condition shall be stated on the final plat, and shall be binding on all later owners of
lots created by the subdivision. [Ord. 4299 § 60 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019; Ord. 4070 § 1 (Exh.
1), 2017].
20.75.140 Final plat — Required certificates.
The following certificates shall be shown on the final plat. Subsections (A) through (G) of this section shall be
signed by the indicated person before the final plat is submitted for review. Subsection (G) of this section is required
for formal subdivision only.
A. Surveyor. The surveyor shall place his seal and signature on the plat along with:
1. A statement certifying that the plat was prepared by him, or under his supervision;
2. A statement certifying that the plat is a true and correct representation of the land surveyed;
3. A full and correct description of the land to be divided.
B. Owner. The owner shall certify that the subdivision has been made with his free consent and according to his
desires. Owners of other interests shown on the title report shall certify that they have notice of the subdivision.
C. Dedications. A certificate of dedication by the owner for all areas to be dedicated to the public, acknowledged by
a notary.
Packet Pg. 312
7.4.a
D. Waiver of Claims. A statement by the owner waiving all claims for damages against any governmental authority
which may arise from the construction, drainage and maintenance of required improvements.
E. Waiver of Access. If required by the conditions of the preliminary approval, a waiver by the owner of direct
access to any street from any property.
F. Roads Not Dedicated. A statement or other clear indication by the owner if any street is not to be dedicated to the
public.
G. Health Officer. A statement by the eity of Ed m ands Snohomish County health officer certifying that the proposed
means of sewage disposal and water supply are adequate.
H. Director of Public Works. The following statements to be signed by the director of public works:
1. A statement approving the survey date, the layout of streets, alleys and other rights -of -way, design of
bridges, sewage and water system and other structures; and approving the final plat or short subdivision.
I. Planning and Development Director. The following statements to be signed by the planning and development
director:
1. A statement that the final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat and all conditions of the
preliminary approval; and approving the final plat or shore subdivision.
J. Repealed by Ord. 4154.
K. Taxes. A statement to be signed by the county treasurer that all taxes and delinquent assessments for which the
land to be divided may be liable as of the date of the signing of the statement have been paid. [Ord. 4299 § 61 (Exh.
A), 2023; Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019; Ord. 4070 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2017].
20.75.145 Final plat — Accompanying material.
The following material shall be submitted to the director of public works with the final plat:
A. Review Fee. A review fee for the final plat as set in Chapter- 15.00.020 shall be paid for each check
or recheck of the final plat.
B. Survey Notes. Complete field and computation notes of the plat survey showing the original or reestablished
corners with descriptions and the actual traverse showing error of closure and method of balancing. A sketch
showing all distances, angles and calculations required to determine corners and distances of the plat shall
accompany this data. The allowable error of closure shall not exceed one foot in 5,000 feet.
C. Title Report. A title report showing that ownership and other interests in the land described and shown on the
final plat is in the name of the person signing the owner's certificate. [Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019; Ord. 4070 § 1
(Exh. 1), 2017].
Section 20.85.020 General requirements.
A. Review. The hearing examiner shall review variances as Type III-B decisions in accordance with provisions of
Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
B. Appeals. The hearing examiner decisions on variance shall be appealable to the city council in accordance with
Chapter 20.06 ECDC.
C. Time Limit. The approved variance must be acted on by the owner within one year from the date of approval or
the variance shall expire and be null and void, unless the owner files an application for an extension of time before
the expiration and the city approves the application.
Packet Pg. 313
7.4.a
D. Review of Extension Application. An application for an extension of time shall be reviewed by the eonmnunity
development direeto planning and development director as a Type II decision (Staff decision — Notice required).
E. Location. A variance applies only to the property for which it has been approved and may not be transferred to
any other property. [Ord. 4154 § 23 (Att. D), 2019; Ord. 3783 § 14, 2010; Ord. 3775 § 14, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 70,
2009].
Section 20.110.040 Enforcement procedures.
A. Order to Correct Violation.
1. Issuance. Whenever the eemmunib, sefviees difeetefplanningand development director or his/her designee
becomes aware that a violation has occurred or is occurring, he/she may issue an order to correct violation to
the property owner or to any person causing, allowing or participating in the violation.
2. Content. The ^e...munity se fviees aire^'^r-planning and development director or his/her designee shall
include the following in the order to correct violation:
a. Name and address of the property owner or other person to whom the order to correct violation is
directed; and
b. The location of the subject property by address or other description sufficient for identification of the
building, structure, premises or land upon or within which the violation has occurred or is occurring; and
c. The code section that has been violated; and
d. A description of the violation; and
e. A statement of action required to be taken to correct the violation; and
f. Date by which compliance is required to avoid monetary penalties. This date will be no less than 24
hours from the date and time that the notice is posed on the property or no less than three days from the
date that the letter is placed in U.S. Mail; and
g. Statement that a monetary penalty in an amount per day for each violation shall be assessed against the
person to whom the order to correct violation is directed for each and every day or portion of a day on
which the violation continues following the administrative hearing.
3. Service of Order. The een*nunivy sen4ees d-i-e—mlanning and development director or his/her designee
shall serve the order to correct violation upon the person to whom it is directed, either by sending a copy by
U.S. Mail to the last known address of the person responsible for the violation, or by posting a copy
conspicuously on the site or by serving a copy of the notice personally on the person responsible for the
violation.
B. Notice of Civil Violation.
1. Issuance. If the person responsible for the violation fails to correct or cause the correction of the violation
within the time given by the order to correct the violation, a notice of civil violation will be issued to each
person to whom the order to correct violation directed.
2. Issuance in an Emergency or for Repeat Violations. The ^^,,,w,unity services director -planning and
development director or his/her designee may issue a notice of civil violation without having issued an order to
correct where an emergency exists or a repeated violation occurs.
3. Content. The applicable department director or his/her designee shall include the following in the notice of
civil violation:
Packet Pg. 314
7.4.a
a. The name and address of the property owner or the person to whom the notice is directed; and
b. The location of the subject property by address or other description sufficient for the identification of
the subject property; and
c. The code section that has been violated; and
d. A description of the violation; and
e. A statement that a monetary penalty in an amount per day is assessed against the person to whom the
violation is directed for each and every day or portion of a day during which the violation continues; and
f. Date by which compliance is required to avoid abatement by the city. This date will be no less than 10
days from the date of the notice to correct violation; and
g. A statement that the person to whom the notice of civil violation is directed must correct the violation
and may pay the monetary penalty imposed to the city of Edmonds planning division or may appeal the
notice of civil violation to the city of Edmonds hearing examiner.
4. Service of Notice. The communit-y sen4ees dir-eetofplanning and development director or his/her designee
shall serve the notice of civil violation upon the person to whom it is directed, either by sending a copy by U.S.
Mail to the last known address of the person responsible for the violation, or by posting a copy conspicuously
on the site or by serving a copy of the notice personally on the person responsible for the violation.
C. Appeal to Hearing Examiner.
1. General. A person to whom the notice of civil violation is directed may appeal the notice of civil violation by
filing a written notice of appeal with the eeniffmait-y sen4ees direetefolanning and development director within
10 days of the date the notice is placed in the mail, or seven days from the date the notice is posted
conspicuously on the property or served personally on the person responsible for the violation.
2. Notice of Hearing. Notice of hearing will be sent by mail, posted on the site, or served in person upon the
violating party no less than five calendar days before the time fixed for the hearing.
3. Hearing by City Violations Hearing Examiner.
a. At the time stated in the notice, the violations hearing examiner will hear all relevant objections,
protests and shall receive testimony under oath. Said hearings may be continued from time to time. If
continued to a date certain, no new posting is required.
b. If the violations hearing examiner finds that a violation of the Edmonds Community Development Code
exists and that there is sufficient cause to abate the same, the hearing examiner will prepare findings and
an order within 24 hours which shall specify:
i. The nature of the violation; and
ii. The amount of fine per day; and
iii. The method of abatement; and
iv. The time by which abatement is to be completed.
D. Appeal to Superior Court. The determination of the hearing examiner is final and shall be appealable to superior
court in accordance with Chapter 36.70C RCW.
E. Abatement by the City. If the violation has not been corrected by the time ordered by the violations hearing
examiner, or by the correction date ordered by the notice of civil violation, an abatement notice shall be sent by mail
to the person responsible for the violation at their last known address, shall be posted in a conspicuous location on
Packet Pg. 315
7.4.a
the site or served personally on the person responsible for the violation no less than 10 working days prior to
abatement by the city. The city, its employees or agents are expressly authorized to enter said property for the
purposes of abatement of said violation. The actual cost of abatement, including any incidental cost such as, but not
limited to: staff time; legal costs; cost of postage or service; and any other reasonable, incidental cost shall be
calculated and added to the monetary penalties. The city shall be free to employ appropriate contractors to remedy
the situation and may pass through all costs of such contractors as incidental costs of abatement.
F. Monetary Penalties. Except where a different penalty is specifically established by this code, violations shall be
assessed at the rate of $100.00 per day or a portion of day thereof, for each and every day after the service of the
notice of civil violation. The violations hearing examiner may also grant an extension of the date upon which fines
begin in order to allow for a reasonable period of abatement. Such extension shall not exceed 10 calendar days.
Following a finding of the hearing examiner of the existence of a violation at the appeal hearing on the expiration of
the appeal period, continuing fines may be assessed by the provision of additional notice of civil violation pursuant
to subsection (B)(2) of this section and an opportunity for hearing. No additional fine for a continuing violation may
be assessed without the provision of notice and the opportunity for a hearing.
G. Collection of Monetary Penalties. The monetary penalties constitute a personal obligation of the persons to whom
the order to correct is directed. Any monetary penalty must be paid to the city of Edmonds planning division within
10 working days from the date of service of the hearing examiner order or as ordered by superior court if the hearing
examiner's decision is appealed. [Ord. 3827 §§ 1, 2, 2010; Ord. 3795 §§ 1, 3, 2010; Ord. 3779 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3242
§ 3, 1999; Ord. 2934 § 1, 1993; Ord. 2913 § 3, 1993].
Section 21.80.020 Permit coordinator.
Permit coordinator means the ^^m.,,*aity development a: ^ planning and development director or other person
designated by the mayor.
Section 22.110.000 Purpose and intent.
The core concept for the Westgate mixed -use district is to create a vibrant mixed -use activity center that enhances
the economic development of the city and provides housing as well as retail and office uses to meet the needs of all
age groups. This chapter seeks to retain key features of the area, including protecting the large trees and green
surrounding hillsides, while increasing walkability and gathering spaces, such as plazas and open spaces. Important
aspects of this chapter include:
A. Protecting steep slopes is a key concept;
B. Designing a landscape emphasis for the primary intersection;
C. Creating a lively pedestrian environment with wide sidewalks and requirements for buildings to be placed close
to the sidewalk;
D. Landscaping the plazas, open spaces, and parking areas with required landscaped open space;
E. Promoting a sustainable low -impact development with a requirement for bioswales, rain gardens, green roofs and
other features to retain and infiltrates stormwater;
F. Providing workforce housing and increasing residential uses including small -sized dwelling units;
G. Providing options for nonmotorized transportation linking new bike lanes into the city's larger system of bike
lanes and extending sidewalks and pedestrian paths into the surrounding residential areas. [Ord. 3993 § 2 (Exh. 2),
2015].
Packet Pg. 316
7.4.a
Section 22.110.030 Green building construction and housing.
A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to encourage the development of a variety of housing choices available to
residents of all economic segments and to encourage sustainable development through the use of development
standards, requirements and incentives.
B. Green Building and Site Design Criteria. All development in the Westgate district shall meet Built Green one- to
three -star or LEED certified rating or equivalent as a requirement and shall meet a minimum green factor score of
0.3.
C. Sustainable Site Design. All development shall meet Built Green one- to three -star or LEED certified standards,
or an equivalent. Green factor score requirements shall be used in the design of sustainable site features and
low -impact stefm er stormwater treatment systems. A green factor score of 0.3 is required of all developments
(see ECDC 22.110.070).
Pervious surfaces shall be integrated into site design and may include: pervious pavement, pervious pavers and
vegetated roofs. Capture and reuse strategies including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns may be substituted
for the effective area of pervious surface required.
Runoff generated on site shall be routed through a treatment system such as a structured stafm wate stormwater
planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement, or cisterns. Runoff leaving the site shall conform to city of
Edmondser stormwater management code, Chapter 18.30 ECDC.
D. Housing. To promote a balance in age demographics and encourage age diversity, the city of Edmonds is actively
encouraging a greater number of dwelling units targeting young professionals and young workers through workforce
housing provisions. The Westgate mixed -use district requires that at least 10 percent of residential units shall be
very small units designed for affordable workforce housing (under 900 square feet) and that not more than 10
percent of all dwelling units may exceed 1,600 square feet in size. [Ord. 3993 § 2 (Exh. 2), 2015].
Section 22.110.070 Amenity space, open space, and green factor standards.
A. Purpose and Intent. This section identifies the types of amenity space and open space allowed to satisfy the
requirements of the Westgate mixed -use zone, and provides design standards for each type to ensure that proposed
development is consistent with the city of Edmonds's goals for character and quality of the buildings and spaces to
be constructed on private property within the Westgate area. This section also describes the green factor
requirements that apply to each development within Westgate.
The intent of the proposed system is not only to establish amenity spaces that serve the community and local needs,
but also to provide for the protection and enhancement of natural resources for the benefit of the greater community
Core principles of the Westgate mixed -use zone are to promote:
1. An environment that encourages and facilitates bicycling and pedestrian activity — "walkable" streets that are
comfortable, efficient, safe, and interesting; and
2. Coherence of the public right-of-way, serving to assist residents, building owners and managers with
understanding the relationship between the public right-of-way and their own properties; and
3. Sustainability, by providing for trees and plants which contribute to privacy, the reduction of noise and air
pollution, shade, maintenance of the natural habitat, conservation of water and rainwater management.
B. Green Factor Requirements.
1. Overview. The green factor sets a minimum score that is required to be achieved by each development
through implementation of landscaping practices. The program provides a menu of landscaping practices that
are intended to increase the functional quantity of landscape in a site, to improve livability and ecological
quality while allowing flexibility in the site design and implementation. In this approach, each qualified
landscape feature utilized in a project earns credits that are weighted and calculated through use of the green
Packet Pg. 317
7.4.a
factor scoresheet. The score is based upon the relationship between the site size and the points earned by
implementation of the specified landscape features.
For example, credits may be earned for quantity and size of trees and shrubs, bioretention facilities, and depth
of soil. Built features such as green roofs, vegetated walls and permeable paving may also earn credits. Bonus
points may be earned with supplementary elements such as drought -tolerant and native plants, rainwater
irrigation, public visibility and food cultivation. Scoring priorities come from livability considerations, an
overall decrease in impervious surfaces and climate change adaptation. The functional benefits target a
reduction ins stormwater runoff, a decrease in building energy, a reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions, and an increase in habitat space.
The minimum score required for all new development in the Westgate district is 0.3, earned through
implementation of features specified below that comply with green factor standards. The implementation of the
green factor does not have any effect upon other site requirements such as setbacks, open space standards,
street and parking standards, city of Edmonds municipal stormwater code and city of Edmonds
code for landscaping requirements that also apply. Green factor credit may be earned for these site
requirements only if they comply with green factor standards.
2. Application and Implementation. The green factor for the Westgate district uses for reference Seattle green
factor tools. These include:
a. The green factor worksheet.
b. The green factor scoresheet.
c. The green factor plant list.
d. The green factor tree list.
The green factor tools are adopted in ECDC 22.110.100.
In complying with the green factor code, the following steps apply:
Step 1. Designers and permit applicants select features to include in planning their site and building and apply
them to the site design. Applicants track the actual quantity — e.g., square footage of landscaped areas, pervious
paved amenity space, number of trees — using the green factor worksheet.
Step 2. Calculations from the worksheet are entered on the scoresheet. The professional also enters the site's
square footage on the electronic scoresheet. The instrument then scores each category of proposed landscape
improvements, and provides a total score in relation to the overall site size. The designer can immediately know
if the site design is achieving the required score of 0.30, and can adjust the design accordingly. Note that
improvements to the public right-of-way (such as public sidewalks, street tree plantings) are allowed to earn
points, even though only the private site square footage is included in the site size calculation.
Step 3. The landscape professional submits the scoresheet with the project plans, certifying that the plan meets
or exceeds the minimum green factor score and other requirements for the property. The submission also
requires indication that a landscape management plan has been submitted to the client.
Step 4. City of Edmonds staff verify that the code requirements have been met before issuance of a permit.
3. Using Green Factor with Other Requirements. While a specific green feature may count for both green factor
calculations and other requirements such as amenity space or open space, the requirements for each need to be
met independently. The percentage of amenity space for Westgate is 15 percent of lot size, to be addressed
within each development project. The open space section, subsection (D) of this section, also addresses green
feature requirements, such as retention of vegetation on steep slopes, specifications for tree size, and storm
water stormwater management (refer to Chapter 18.30 ECDC); these are examples of features that are likely to
overlap with and contribute to the green factor score while also contributing to the open space requirement.
Packet Pg. 318
7.4.a
4. Green Factor Categories. The green factor tools may take into account the following landscape elements:
a. Landscaped areas (based on soil depth).
b. Bioretention facilities.
c. Plantings (mulch and ground cover).
d. Shrubs and perennials.
e. Tree canopy (based on tree sizes).
f. Green roofs.
g. Vegetated walls.
h. Approved water features.
i. Permeable paving.
j. Structural soil systems.
k. Bonuses for drought -tolerant plants, harvested rainwater, food cultivation, etc.
C. Amenity Space. Amenity space is designed to provide residents and visitors of all ages with a variety of outdoor
activity space. Although the character of these amenity spaces will differ, they form the places that encourage
residents and visitors to spend time in the company of others or to enjoy time in an outdoor setting.
All new development shall provide amenity space equal to at least 15 percent of the lot size. Additional amenity
space above the 15 percent base requirement is encouraged and can be part of the development's green factor plan
outlined in subsection (B) of this section or can contribute to bonus heights as defined in ECDC 22.110.090. All
qualifying amenity space shall be open and accessible to the public during business hours. Qualifying amenity space
shall be open to the air and located within six feet of the finished grade in order to provide some opportunity for
variety and interest in public space while assuring easy accessibility for the public.
Required and bonus amenity space must be provided in one or more of the following forms and no others:
1. Lawns: an open space, available for unstructured recreation. A lawn may be spatially defined by landscaping
rather than building frontages. Its landscape shall consist of lawn and trees and shall provide a minimum of 60
percent planted pervious surface area (such as a turf, groundcover, soil or mulch).
2. Plazas: an open space, available for civic purposes and commercial activities. A plaza shall be spatially
defined primarily by building facades, with strong connections to interior uses. Its landscape shall consist
primarily of pavement. Trees are encouraged. Plazas shall be located between buildings and at the intersection
of important streets. Plazas shall provide a minimum of 20 percent planted pervious surface area (such as a rain
garden, bioswale, turf, groundcover, soil or mulch). The remaining balance may be any paved surface with a
maximum 30 percent impervious paved surface.
3. Squares: an open space available for unstructured recreation or civic purposes. A square is spatially defined
by building facades with strong connections to interior uses. Its landscape shall consist of paths, lawns and trees
with a minimum of 20 percent planted pervious surface area (such as a rain garden, bioswale, turf,
groundcover, soil or mulch). The remaining balance may be any paved surface with a maximum 30 percent
impervious paved surface.
Sidewalks. Although not counting toward required amenity space, the purpose of sidewalks is to provide safe,
convenient, and pleasant pedestrian circulation along all streets, access to shopfronts and businesses, and to improve
the character and identity of commercial and residential areas consistent with the city of Edmonds vision. New
Packet Pg. 319
7.4.a
development meeting the standards of this chapter may be allowed to use a portion of the sidewalk area within the
public right-of-way for outdoor seating, temporary displays, or other uses consistent with city code standards.
D. Open Space. All new development shall provide a minimum of 15 percent of lot size as open space. Qualifying
open space shall be unobstructed and open to the air. The goal for the overall open space in the Westgate mixed -use
zone is to create a unified, harmonious, and aesthetically pleasing environment that also integrates sustainable
concepts and solutions that restore natural functions and processes. In addition to amenity space, the Westgate
mixed -use zone shall incorporate open space, as described in the regulations for each building type. Features
contributing to the landscape character of Westgate also include:
1. Trees. The location and selection of all new tree planting will express the underlying interconnectivity of the
Westgate district and surrounding neighborhoods. Species selection will be in character with the local and
regional environment, and comprised of an appropriate mix of evergreen and deciduous trees. Trees will be
used to define the landscape character of open space and amenity space areas, identify entry points, and
reinforce the legibility of the district by defining major and minor thoroughfares for pedestrians, bicycles and
vehicles.
a. All new development shall preserve existing trees wherever feasible.
b. All new development shall plant new trees in accordance with this chapter.
Trees not included in amenity space or open space areas are not counted toward meeting overall amenity space
or open space requirements. For example, individual trees planted along walkways or driveways may count
toward meeting the green factor requirements but are not counted as open space.
2. Steep Slopes. New development shall protect steep slopes by retaining all existing trees and vegetation on
protected slopes, as shown on the map included in this section (Figure 22.110.070.D). No development activity,
including activities such as clearing, grading, or construction of structures or retaining walls, shall extend uphill
of the protected slope line shown on the following map. Protected slope areas may count toward required open
space if they retain existing trees or are supplemented to provide a vegetative buffer.
3. Storm .;'Rte Stormwater Management. Cie Stormwater runoff from sidewalks should be conveyed
to planted parkways or landscaped rain gardens. Overflow from parkways and runoff from the roadways should
be directed into bioswales and/or pervious paving in curbside parking areas, located along the street edges
where it can infiltrate into the ground. Perforated curbs through which streetsteFm ei stormwater runoff can
flow to open vegetated swales may also be provided, wherever feasible. Swa4er-Stormwater features such
as bioswales or planted rain gardens may count toward required open space only if they are entirely landscaped.
Packet Pg. 320
7.4.a
Figure 22.110.070.1) Protected Slopes
1'A .6 � w �411t at7117m 0j 9M9 ffiI8 r. p119
iNRiSE o �a _ lfAa 8>df n
lytl
- m n n n 9dt60 Tllld ��77A7319�� ° °� 'v
1E90A � 3FI l = �anN1lL � m f "q
� a� `- IIAN 13A0 N � 4 ag �i.1 ryep
h i 1A111 97A11 � m m �+ 91n p3 ^v @ M1
;N5eiN: i2A1S
PAFN iG �� p
'o DA 72A78 a 140
M1h
V M1 O�} C Aw.GREai ..
aAWx 97I5
nuts t 9c3 33WI
Woos -I99aA IA91fi x9e30
Dinm =� yAa9 aS1
33W7 yyd15 21919 IMR a Y.+p14 yPli t
M6 23421 h 1394 93A25 i3A74 "
lA27 y9 E3d3a BART. W 02 i d77 39025 1EAu 799i7 se" a
4 y192 A 9 p y679 7303d DD31 yA3s m 9EC9 u�va
2343 Zf195 23, 2 ttlo 2111 �31a a3A5 971191d7
Y311By112 971t1 '14 F 9711d 7311f m=1'7FL S'N
Mts a11r 3111: O 23115 29119 9%9 a
73t75 6�9 8 `0 17 33119 ¢ 971A ARs n
IZQ n — 0 �b" I21 c °m 9B1! yl7t 9}99 33126 n $
. n a
ON W0�1AAY .f�C _-S11
H.3. RF 997E n 73uA; 737p3 23m 9"4 93. 9511
y`IX
I MA
I Z]
--- � hotetledslope line jlmm6er intlirates related slope EOMour, flappliEa6kl
_. Rne:oslLmw�m�fa'Meaeae�e:aaq�eavedpe�fioc>33as;Inwremxmiar��eaNmdsauer��e.
[Ord. 3993 § 2 (Exh. 2), 2015].
Section 22.110.080 Public space standards.
Future development of the Westgate mixed -use district shall capitalize on opportunities to create and enhance public
spaces for recreational use, pedestrian activity, and ecological health to strengthen the overall character of the
district's public spaces.
A. Public Space — General Requirements. Public space shall enhance and promote the environmental quality and the
aesthetic character of the Westgate district in the following ways:
1. The landscape shall define, unify and enhance the public realm, including streets, parks, plazas, and
sidewalks;
2. The landscape shall be sensitive to its environmental context and utilize plant species that reduce the need for
supplemental irrigation water;
3. The landscape shall cleanse and detainer stormwater on site by utilizing a combination of
biofiltration, permeable paving and subsurface detention methods; and
4. The landscape shall be compatible with encouraging health and wellness, encouraging walking, bicycling,
and other activities.
B. Public Space — Sustainability. The goal for the overall landscape design of public spaces is to create a unified,
harmonious, socially vibrant, and aesthetically pleasing environment that also integrates sustainable concepts and
solutions to restore natural functions and processes. The public right-of-way and urban street runoff becomes an
extension of existing drainage pathways and the natural ecology.
Water -efficient landscaping shall be introduced to reduce irrigation requirements based on a soil/climate analysis to
determine the most appropriate indigenous/native-in-character, and drought -tolerant plants. All planted areas, except
for lawn and seeded groundcover, shall receive a surface layer of specified recycled mulch to assist in the retention
of moisture and reduce watering requirements, while minimizing weed growth and reducing the need for chemical
herbicide treatments.
Packet Pg. 321
7.4.a
Where irrigation is required, high efficiency irrigation technology with low pressure applications such as drip,
soaker hose, rain shutoff devices, and low volume spray will be used. The efficiency and uniformity of a low water
flow rate reduces evaporation and runoff and encourages deep percolation. After the initial growth period of three to
seven years, irrigation may be limited in accordance with city requirements then in place.
The location and selection of all new tree planting will implement "green infrastructure" principles and visually
express the underlying interconnectivity of the Westgate development by doing the following:
1. Species selection shall be comprised of an appropriate mix of evergreen and deciduous trees.
2. Trees shall be used to define the landscape character of recreation and open space areas, identify entry
points, and reinforce the legibility of the neighborhood by defining major and minor thoroughfares for
pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles.
3. Trees shall also be used to soften and shade surface parking and circulation areas.
C. Stafm Wate Stormwater Management. e Stormwater shall be consistent with Chapter 18.30 ECDC.
Storm wate Stormwater and hydrology components shall be integrated into the Westgate district to restore and
maintain natural functions and processes, and mitigate negative environmental impacts.
Public rights -of -way, proposed open space and parking lots shall filter and infiltrate eistormwater to the
maximum extent feasible to protect the receiving waters of Puget Sound. This ecological concept transcends the
Westgate district to positively affect the surrounding neighborhoods, stream corridors and the regional watershed.
1. The two primary objectives of the proposed storm wate stormwater and hydrology components are:
a. To reduce volume and rate of runoff; and
b. To eliminate or minimize runoff pollutants through natural filtration.
2. These objectives shall be met by:
a. Maximizing pervious areas;
b. Maximizing the use of trees;
Packet Pg. 322
7.4.a
c. Controlling runoff into bioswales and biofiltration strips;
d. Utilizing permeable paving surfaces where applicable and feasible;
e. Utilizing portions of parks and recreational spaces as detention basin; and
f. Removing sediments and dissolved pollutants from runoff.
D. SR 104/100th Avenue Intersection.
1. The design objectives for development, amenity space, open space, and landscape construction features at
this key intersection are to provide a sense of place and convey the walkable and sustainable character of the
Westgate district.
2. Building step -backs, pedestrian -oriented facades and amenities are required for the portions of buildings
within 40 feet of the corner at each quadrant of this intersection, as illustrated in Figure 22.110.010.13.
3. The design objectives at this intersection shall be addressed with a combination of building facade
treatments, public signage and amenity features (e.g., water features, art -work, bollards, benches,
pedestrian -scale lighting, arbors, green walls, landscaping, arcades) to signify the intersection's importance as a
focal point of the Westgate area (see Figure 22.110.080.D for examples).
Figure 22.110.080.D. Examples of Identity and Landscape Construction Features
[Ord. 3993 § 2 (Exh. 2), 2015].
Section 23.40.005 Definitions pertaining to critical areas.
For the purposes of this chapter and the chapters on the five specific critical area types (Chapters 23.50, 23.60,
23.70, 23.80 and 23.90 ECDC) the following definitions shall apply:
"Adjacent" means those activities located on site immediately adjoining a critical area; or distance equal to or less
than 225 feet of a development proposal or subject parcel.
Packet Pg. 323
7.4.a
"Alteration" means any human -induced action which changes the existing condition of a critical area or its buffer.
Alterations include, but are not limited to: grading; filling; dredging; draining; channelizing; cutting, pruning,
limbing or topping, clearing, relocating or removing vegetation; applying herbicides or pesticides or any hazardous
or toxic substance; discharging pollutants; paving, construction, application of gravel; modifying for surface water
management purposes; or any other human activity that changes the existing landforms, vegetation, hydrology,
wildlife or wildlife habitat value of critical areas.
Best Available Science. See ECDC 23.40.310.
"Best management practices" means a system of practices and management measures that:
1. Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by nutrients, animal waste, and toxics;
2. Control the movement of sediment and erosion caused by land alteration activities;
3. Minimize adverse impacts to surface and ground water quality, flow, and circulation patterns; and
4. Minimize adverse impacts to the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of critical areas.
"Buffer" means the designated area immediately next to and a part of a steep slope or landslide hazard area and
which protects slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows and landslide hazards reasonably necessary to
minimize risks to persons or property; or a designated area immediately next to and part of a stream or wetland that
is an integral part of the stream or wetland ecosystem.
"Chapter" means those sections of this title sharing the same third and fourth digits.
"City" means the city of Edmonds.
City Council or Council. See ECDC 21.15.030.
"Class" or "wetland class" means descriptive categories of wetland vegetation communities within the wetlands
taxonomic classification system of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Cowardin, et al., 1979).
"Clearing" means the act of cutting and/or removing vegetation. This definition shall include grubbing vegetation
and the use or application of herbicide.
"Compensation project" means an action(s) specifically designed to replace project -induced critical area or buffer
losses. Compensation project design elements may include, but are not limited to: land acquisition procedures and
detailed plans including functional value assessments, detailed landscaping designs, construction drawings, and
monitoring and contingency plans.
"Compensatory mitigation" means replacing project -induced losses or impacts to a critical area, and includes, but is
not limited to, the following:
1. "Creation" means actions performed to intentionally establish a wetland at a site where it did not formerly
exist.
2. "Reestablishment" means actions performed to restore processes and functions to an area that was formerly a
critical area, where the former critical area was lost by past alterations and activities.
3. "Rehabilitation" means improving or repairing processes and functions to an area that is an existing critical
area that is highly degraded because one or more environmental processes supporting the critical area have
been disrupted.
4. "Enhancement" means actions performed to improve the condition of existing degraded wetlands so that the
functions they provide are of a higher quality.
5. "Preservation" means actions taken to ensure the permanent protection of existing high -quality wetlands.
Packet Pg. 324
7.4.a
"Creation" means a compensation project performed to intentionally establish a wetland or stream at a site where
one did not formerly exist.
"Critical areas" for the city of Edmonds means wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas,
geologically hazardous areas, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas as defined in Chapters 23.50, 23.60,
23.70, 23.80 and 23.90 ECDC, respectively.
"Development proposal" means any activity relating to the use and/or development of land requiring a permit or
approval from the city, including, but not limited to: commercial or residential building permit; binding site plan;
conditional use permit; franchise; right-of-way permit; grading and clearing permit; mixed use approval; planned
residential development; shoreline conditional use permit; shoreline substantial development permit; shoreline
variance; short subdivision; special use permit; subdivision; flood hazard permit; unclassified use permit; utility and
other use permit; variance; rezone; or any required permit or approval not expressly exempted by this title.
"Director" means the city of Edmonds planning and development director or his/her designee.
"Division" means the planning division of the city of Edmonds planning and development department.
"Enhancement" means an action taken to improve the condition and function of a critical area. In the case of
wetland or stream, the term includes a compensation project performed to improve the conditions of an existing
degraded wetland or stream to increase its functional value.
"Erosion" means the process in which soil particles are mobilized and transported by natural agents such as wind,
rain, frost action, or stream flow.
Erosion Hazard Areas. See ECDC 23.80.020(A).
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. See Chapter 23.90 ECDC.
"Floodplain" means the total area subject to inundation by a "100-year flood." "100-year flood" means a flood
having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year.
"Footprint of existing development" or "footprint of development" means the area of a site that contains legally
established: buildings; roads, driveways, parking lots, storage areas, walkways or other areas paved with concrete,
asphalt or compacted gravel; outdoor swimming pools; patios.
Frequently Flooded Areas. See Chapter 23.70 ECDC.
"Functions" means the roles served by critical areas including, but not limited to: water quality protection and
enhancement; fish and wildlife habitat; food chain support; flood storage, conveyance and attenuation; ground water
recharge and discharge; erosion control; wave attenuation; aesthetic value protection; and recreation. These roles are
not listed in order of priority.
Geologically Hazardous Areas. See Chapter 23.80 ECDC.
"Geologist" means a person licensed as a geologist, engineering geologist, or hydrologist in the state of Washington.
For geologically hazardous areas, an applicant may choose a geologist or engineering geologist licensed in the state
of Washington to assess the potential hazard.
"Geotechnical engineer" means a practicing geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a professional civil engineer in
the state of Washington who has at least five years of professional employment as a geotechnical engineer in
responsible charge including experience with landslide evaluation.
"Grading" means any one or a combination of excavating, filling, or disturbance of that portion of the soil profile
which contains decaying organic matter.
"Habitats of local importance" means areas that include a seasonal range or habitat element with which a given
species has a primary association, and which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will maintain and
Packet Pg. 325
7.4.a
reproduce over the long term. These might include areas of high relative density or species richness, breeding
habitat, winter range, and movement corridors. These might also include habitats that are of limited availability or
high vulnerability to alterations such as cliffs, talus, and wetlands. In urban areas like the city of Edmonds, habitats
of local importance include biodiversity areas and corridors, which are characterized by a framework of ecological
components which provides the physical conditions necessary for ecosystems and species populations to survive in a
human -dominated landscape.
"In -lieu fee program" means a program which sells compensatory mitigation credits to permittees whose obligation
to provide compensatory mitigation is then transferred to the in -lieu program sponsor, a governmental or nonprofit
natural resource management entity.
Landslide Hazard Areas. See ECDC 23.80.020(B).
"Mitigation" means the use of any or all of the following actions, which are listed in descending order of preference:
1. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
2. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using
appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps such as project redesign, relocation, or timing to avoid or
reduce impacts;
3. Rectifying the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, and habitat
conservation areas by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the historical conditions
or the conditions existing at the time of the initiation of the project;
4. Minimizing or eliminating the hazard by restoring or stabilizing the hazard area through engineered or other
methods;
5. Reducing or eliminating the impact or hazard over time by preservation and maintenance operations during
the life of the action;
6. Compensating for the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded areas, and
habitat conservation areas by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; and
7. Monitoring the hazard or other required mitigation and taking remedial action when necessary.
"Native vegetation" means vegetation comprised of plant species which are indigenous to the Puget Sound region
and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. "Native vegetation" does not include
noxious weeds as defined by the state of Washington or federal agencies.
"Normal maintenance of vegetation" means removal of shrubs/nonwoody vegetation and trees (less than four -inch
diameter at breast height) that occurs at least every other year. Maintenance also may include tree topping that has
been previously approved by the city in the past five years.
"Noxious weeds" means any plant that is highly destructive, competitive or difficult to control by cultural or
chemical practices, limited to those plants on the state noxious weed list contained in Chapter 16-750 WAC.
"Planning staff' means those employed in the planning division of the city of Edmonds planning and development
department.
"Qualified critical areas consultant" or "qualified professional" means a person who has the qualifications specified
below to conduct critical areas studies pursuant to this title, and to make recommendations for critical areas
mitigation. For geologically hazardous areas, the qualified critical areas consultant shall be a geologist or
engineering geologist licensed in the state of Washington to assess the potential hazard. If development is to take
place within a geologically hazardous area, the qualified critical areas consultant developing mitigation plans and
design shall be a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington and familiar with landslide and slope
stability mitigation. For wetlands and streams, the qualified critical areas consultant shall be a specialist in botany,
fisheries, wetland biology, and/or hydrology with a minimum of five years' field experience with wetlands and/or
Packet Pg. 326
7.4.a
streams in the Pacific Northwest. Requirements defining a qualified critical areas consultant or qualified
professional are contained within the chapter on each critical area type.
"Reasonable economic use(s)" means the minimum use to which a property owner is entitled under applicable state
and federal constitutional provisions in order to avoid a taking and/or violation of substantive due process.
"Redeveloped land(s)" means those lands on which existing structures are demolished in their entirety to allow for
new development. The director shall maintain discretion to determine if the demolition of a majority of existing
structures or portions thereof constitute the redevelopment of a property or subject parcel.
"Restoration" means the actions necessary to return a stream, wetland or other critical area to a state in which its
stability, functions and values approach its unaltered state as closely as possible. For wetlands, restoration as
compensatory mitigation may include reestablishment or rehabilitation.
Seismic Hazard Areas. See ECDC 23.80.020(C).
"Species of local importance" means those species that are of local concern due to their population status, their
sensitivity to habitat manipulation, or that are game (hunted) species. (See ECDC 23.90.010(A)(4).)
"Stormwater Management Manual' means the stormwater manual specified in Chapter 18.30 ECDC.
"Streams" means any area where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed which demonstrates clear
evidence, such as the sorting of sediments, of the passage of water. The channel or bed need not contain water
year-round. This definition is not meant to include irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water runoff devices
(drainage ditches) or other entirely artificial watercourses unless they are used by salmonids or used to convey
streams naturally occurring prior to construction of such watercourse. Streams are further classified into Categories
S, F, Np and Ns and fishbearing or nonfishbearing 1, 2 and 3. (See ECDC 23.90.010(A)(1).)
"Title" means all chapters of the city of Edmonds Community Development Code beginning with the digits 23.
"Undeveloped land(s)" means land(s) on which manmade structures or land modifications (clearing, grading, etc.)
do not exist. The director retains discretion to identify undeveloped land(s) in those instances where historical
modifications and structures may have existed on a property or subject parcel in the past.
"Wetland functions" means those natural processes performed by wetlands, such as facilitating food chain
production; providing habitat for nesting, rearing and resting sites for aquatic, terrestrial or avian species;
maintaining the availability and quality of water; acting as recharge and/or discharge areas for ground water
aquifers; and moderating surface water ands stormwater flows.
"Wetland mitigation bank" means a site where wetlands are restored, created, enhanced, or in exceptional
circumstances, preserved expressly for the purpose of providing compensatory mitigation in advance of authorized
impacts to similar resources.
"Wetlands" means those areas that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a frequency and duration
sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted
for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from
nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass -lined swales, canals, detention
facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July
1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street or highway. However,
wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas created to mitigate
conversion of wetlands if permitted by the city (WAC 365-190-030(22)). Wetlands are further classified into
Categories 1, 2, 3 and 4. (See ECDC 23.50.010(B).) [Ord. 4299 § 67 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4026 § 1 (Art. A), 2016;
Ord. 3952 § 1, 2013; Ord. 3931 § 2, 2013; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004. Formerly 23.40.320].
Packet Pg. 327
7.4.a
Section 23.40.020 Relationship to other regulations.
A. These critical areas regulations shall apply as an overlay and in addition to zoning, site development, stor-m water
stormwater management, building and other regulations adopted by the city of Edmonds.
B. Any individual critical area adjoined or overlain by another type of critical area shall have the buffer and meet the
requirements that provide the most protection to the critical areas involved. When any provision of this title or any
existing land use regulation conflicts with this title, that which provides more protection to the critical area shall
apply-
C. These critical areas regulations shall be coordinated with review conducted under the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA), as necessary and locally adopted.
D. Compliance with the provisions of this title does not constitute compliance with other federal, state, and local
regulations and permit requirements that may be required (for example, shoreline substantial development permits,
Hydraulic Permit Act (HPA) permits, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Section 404 permits, and National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permits). The applicant is
responsible for complying with these requirements, apart from the process established in this title. [Ord. 4026 § 1
(Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
Section 23.40.090 Critical areas report — Requirements.
A. Preparation by Qualified Professional. The applicant shall submit a critical areas report prepared by a qualified
professional as defined herein. For wetlands, frequently flooded areas and fish and wildlife habitat conservation
areas, an applicant may choose one of the qualified technical consultants on the city's approved list to prepare
critical areas reports per the requirements of this title or may apply to utilize an alternative consultant. Critical areas
studies and reports developed by an alternative consultant may be subject to independent review pursuant to
subsection (B) of this section. All costs associated with the critical areas study shall be borne by the applicant.
B. Independent Review of Critical Areas Reports. Critical areas studies and reports on geologically hazardous areas
and those developed by an applicant representative or consultant not as part of a three -party contract may, at the
discretion of the director, be subject to independent review. This independent review shall be performed by a
qualified technical consultant selected by the city with all costs borne by the applicant. The purpose of such
independent review is to provide the city with objective technical assistance in evaluating the accuracy of submitted
reports and/or the effects on critical areas which may be caused by a development proposal and to facilitate the
decision -making process. The director may also have technical assistance provided by appropriate resource agency
staff if such assistance is available in a timely manner.
C. Best Available Science. The critical areas report shall use scientifically valid methods and studies in the analysis
of critical areas data and field reconnaissance and reference the source of science used. The critical areas report shall
evaluate the proposal and all probable impacts to critical areas in accordance with the provisions of this title.
D. Minimum Report Contents. At a minimum, the report shall contain the following:
1. The name and contact information of the applicant, a description of the proposal, and identification of the
permit requested;
2. A copy of the site plan for the development proposal including:
a. A map to scale depicting critical areas, buffers, the development proposal, and any areas to be cleared;
and
b. A description of the proposed storm wate stormwater management plan for the development and
consideration of impacts to drainage alterations;
c. The site plan shall identify the location of all native and nonnative vegetation of six inches dbh or
larger;
Packet Pg. 328
7.4.a
3. The dates, names, and qualifications of the persons preparing the report and documentation of any fieldwork
performed on the site;
4. Identification and characterization of all critical areas, wetlands, water bodies, shorelines, and buffers
adjacent to the proposed project area;
5. A description of reasonable efforts made to apply mitigation sequencing pursuant to ECDC 23.40.120,
Mitigation sequencing, to avoid, minimize, and mitigate impacts to critical areas;
6. Report requirements specific to each critical area type as indicated in the corresponding chapters of this title;
7. A statement specifying the accuracy of the report and all assumptions made and relied upon;
8. A description of the methodologies used to conduct the critical areas study, including references; and
9. Plans for adequate mitigation, as needed to offset any critical areas impacts, in accordance with the
mitigation plan requirements in ECDC 23.40.130.
E. Unless otherwise provided, a critical areas report may incorporate, be supplemented by or composed, in whole or
in part, of any reports or studies required by other laws and regulations or previously prepared for and applicable to
the development proposal site, as approved by the director. At the discretion of the director, reports previously
compiled or submitted as part of a proposal for development may be used as a critical areas report to the extent that
the requirements of this section and the report requirements for each specific critical area type are met.
F. Critical areas reports shall be considered valid for five years; after such date the city shall determine whether a
revision or additional assessment is necessary. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
Section 23.40.220 Allowed activities.
A. Critical Area Report. Activities allowed under this title shall have been reviewed and permitted or approved by
the city of Edmonds or other agency with jurisdiction, but do not require submittal of a critical area report, unless
such submittal was required previously for the underlying permit. The director may apply conditions to the
underlying permit or approval to ensure that the allowed activity is consistent with the provisions of this title to
protect critical areas.
B. Required Use of Best Management Practices. All allowed activities shall be conducted using the best
management practices that result in the least amount of impact to the critical areas. Best management practices shall
be used for tree and vegetation protection, construction management, erosion and sedimentation control, water
quality protection, and regulation of chemical applications. The city may observe or require independent inspection
of the use of best management practices to ensure that the activity does not result in degradation to the critical area.
Any incidental damage to, or alteration of, a critical area shall be restored, rehabilitated, or replaced at the
responsible party's expense.
C. Allowed Activities. The following activities are allowed:
1. Permit Requests Subsequent to Previous Critical Areas Review. Development permits and approvals that
involve both discretionary land use approvals (such as subdivisions, rezones, or conditional use permits) and
construction approvals (such as building permits) if all of the following conditions have been met:
a. The provisions of this title have been previously addressed as part of another approval;
b. There have been no material changes in the potential impact to the critical area or buffer since the prior
review;
c. The permit or approval has not expired or, if no expiration date, no more than five years have elapsed
since the issuance of that permit or approval;
Packet Pg. 329
7.4.a
d. There is no new information available that is applicable to any critical area review of the site or
particular critical area•, and
e. Compliance with any standards or conditions placed upon the prior permit or approval has been
achieved or secured;
2. Modification to Structures Existing Outside of Critical Areas and/or Buffers. Structural modification of,
addition to, or replacement of a legally constructed structure existing outside of a critical area or its buffer that
does not further alter or increase the impact to the critical area or buffer and there is no increased risk to life or
property as a result of the proposed modification or replacement;
3. Modifications to Existing Structures within Critical Areas and/or Buffers. Modification to a legally
constructed structure existing within a critical area or buffer shall be allowed when the modification:
a. Does not increase the footprint of the structure; and
b. Does not increase the impact to the critical area or buffer; and
c. Does not increase risk to life or property as a result of the proposed modification or replacement.
Additions to legally constructed structures existing within a critical area or buffer that do increase the existing
footprint of development shall be subject to and permitted in accordance with the development standards of the
associated critical area type (see ECDC 23.50.040 and 23.90.040). This provision shall be interpreted to
supplement the provisions of the Edmonds Community Development Code relating to nonconforming
structures in order to permit the full reconstruction of a legal nonconforming building within its footprint;
4. Development Proposals within Interrupted Stream or Wetland Buffers. Adjacent areas that may be physically
separated from a stream or wetland due to existing, legally established structures or paved areas may be
exempted from the prescribed buffer widths if proven scientifically to be functionally isolated from the stream
or wetland. The director will require the applicant to provide a site assessment and functional analysis
documentation report by a qualified critical area consultant that demonstrates the interrupted buffer area is
functionally isolated. The director shall consider the hydrologic, geologic, and/or biological habitat connection
potential and the extent and permanence of the physical separation;
5. Activities within the Improved Right -of -Way. Replacement, modification, installation, or construction of
utility facilities, lines, pipes, mains, equipment, or appurtenances, when such facilities are located within the
improved portion of the public right-of-way or a city -authorized private roadway, except those activities that
alter a wetland or watercourse, such as culverts or bridges, or result in the transport of sediment or increased
storm wate stormwater;
6. Minor Utility Projects. Utility projects that have minor or short -duration impacts to critical areas, as
determined by the director in accordance with the criteria below, and which do not significantly impact the
function or values of a critical area(s); provided, that such projects are constructed with best management
practices and additional restoration measures are provided. Minor activities shall not result in the transport of
sediment or increased storm wate stormwater. Such allowed minor utility projects shall meet the following
criteria:
a. There is no practical alternative to the proposed activity with less impact on critical areas;
b. The activity involves the placement of utility pole(s), street sign(s), anchor(s), or vault(s) or other small
component(s) of a utility facility; and
c. The activity involves disturbance of an area less than 75 square feet;
7. Public and Private Pedestrian Trails. New public and private pedestrian trails subject to the following:
Packet Pg. 330
7.4.a
a. The trail surface shall be limited to pervious surfaces and meet all other requirements, including water
quality standards set forth in the current editions of the International Residential Code and International
Building Code, as adopted in ECDC Title 19;
b. Critical area and/or buffer widths shall be increased, where possible, equal to the width of the trail
corridor, including disturbed areas;
c. Trails proposed to be located in landslide or erosion hazard areas shall be constructed in a manner that
does not increase the risk of landslide or erosion and in accordance with an approved geotechnical report;
and
d. Trails located only in the outer 25 percent of critical areas buffers, and located to avoid removal of
significant trees. Where existing legally established development has reduced the width of the critical
areas buffer, trails may be placed in the outer 25 percent of the remaining critical area buffer. The trail
shall be no more than five feet in width and for pedestrian use only. Raised boardwalks utilizing
nontreated pilings may be acceptable.
Allowances for trails within the inner 75 percent of critical areas buffers are provided within applicable
sections of Chapters 23.50 through 23.90 ECDC;
8. Select Vegetation Removal Activities. The following vegetation removal activities:
a. The removal of the following vegetation with hand labor and hand tools for the purpose of habitat
restoration when the area of work is under 1,500 square feet in area per year:
i. Invasive and noxious weeds;
ii. English ivy (Hedera helix);
iii. Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor, R. procerus);
iv. Evergreen blackberry (Rubus laciniatus);
v. Scot's broom (Cytisus scoparius); and
vi. Hedge and field bindweed (Convolvulus sepium and C. arvensis);
Removal of these invasive and noxious plant species shall be restricted to hand removal unless permits or
approval from the appropriate regulatory agencies have been obtained for approved biological or chemical
treatments or other removal techniques. All removed plant material shall be taken away from the site and
appropriately disposed of. Plants that appear on the Washington State Noxious Weed Control Board list of
noxious weeds must be handled and disposed of according to a noxious weed control plan appropriate to
that species.
For activities intended to protect or restore habitat in wetlands or fish and wildlife habitat conservation
areas, vegetation removal under this section may exceed the 1,500 square foot limitation if:
i. The activity is proposed and managed by a nonprofit or other organization, approved by the city, that
has demonstrated expertise and experience in the restoration or invasive removal activity; and
ii. The project sponsor provides a specific proposal identifying the scope and location of the project,
provides for project supervision, and includes a monitoring and inspection schedule acceptable to the
city and approved by the appropriate city department;
b. The removal of trees from critical areas and buffers that are hazardous, posing a threat to public safety,
or posing an imminent risk of damage to private property; provided, that:
Packet Pg. 331
7.4.a
i. The applicant submits a report from an ISA- or ASCA-certified arborist or registered landscape
architect that documents the hazard and provides a replanting schedule for the replacement trees;
ii. Tree cutting shall be limited to pruning and crown thinning, unless otherwise justified by a qualified
professional. Where pruning or crown thinning is not sufficient to address the hazard, trees should be
removed or converted to wildlife snags;
iii. All vegetation cut (tree stems, branches, etc.) shall be left within the critical area or buffer unless
removal is warranted due to the potential for disease or pest transmittal to other healthy vegetation or
unless removal is warranted to improve slope stability;
iv. The land owner shall replace any trees that are removed with new trees at a ratio of two
replacement trees for each tree removed (2:1) within one year in accordance with an approved
restoration plan. Replacement trees may be planted at a different, nearby location if it can be
determined that planting in the same location would create a new hazard or potentially damage the
critical area. Replacement trees shall be species that are native and indigenous to the site and a
minimum of one to two inches in diameter at breast height (dbh) for deciduous trees and a minimum of
six feet in height for evergreen trees as measured from the top of the root ball;
v. If a tree to be removed provides critical habitat, such as an eagle perch, a qualified wildlife biologist
shall be consulted to determine timing and methods of removal that will minimize impacts; and
vi. Hazard trees determined to pose an imminent threat or danger to public health or safety, to public or
private property, or of serious environmental degradation may be removed or pruned by the land owner
prior to receiving written approval from the city; provided, that within 14 days following such action,
the land owner shall submit a restoration plan that demonstrates compliance with the provisions of this
title;
c. Measures to control a fire or halt the spread of disease or damaging insects consistent with the State
Forest Practices Act, Chapter 76.09 RCW; provided, that the removed vegetation shall be replaced in kind
or with similar native species within one year in accordance with an approved restoration plan;
d. Chemical Applications. The application of herbicides, pesticides, organic or mineral -derived fertilizers,
or other hazardous substances, if necessary, as approved by the city; provided, that their use shall be
restricted in accordance with State Department of Fish and Wildlife Management Recommendations and
the regulations of the State Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
Department of Ecology; and
e. Unless otherwise provided, or as a necessary part of an approved alteration, removal of any vegetation
or woody debris from a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or wetland shall be prohibited;
9. Minor Site Investigative Work. Work necessary for land use submittals, such as surveys, soil logs,
percolation tests, and other related activities, where such activities do not require construction of new roads or
significant amounts of excavation. In every case, impacts to the critical area shall be minimized and disturbed
areas shall be immediately restored; and
10. Navigational Aids and Boundary Markers. Construction or modification of navigational aids and boundary
markers. [Ord. 4106 § 1, 2018; Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
Section 23.40.240 Unauthorized critical area alterations and enforcement.
A. When a critical area or its buffer has been altered in violation of this title or the provisions of Chapter 7.200 ECC,
all ongoing development work shall stop and the critical area shall be restored. The director shall have the authority
to issue a stop work order to cease all ongoing development work, and order restoration, rehabilitation, or
replacement measures at the owner's or other responsible party's expense to compensate for violation of the
provisions of this title. The director may also require an applicant or property owner to take immediate action to
ensure site stabilization and/or erosion control as needed.
Packet Pg. 332
7.4.a
B. Requirement for Restoration Plan. All development work shall remain stopped until a restoration plan is prepared
and approved by the director. Such a plan shall be prepared by a qualified professional using the best available
science and shall describe how the actions proposed meet the minimum requirements described in subsection (C) of
this section. The director shall, at the violator's expense, seek expert advice in determining the adequacy of the plan.
Inadequate plans shall be returned to the applicant or violator for revision and resubmittal.
C. Minimum Performance Standards for Restoration.
1. For alterations to frequently flooded areas, wetlands, and fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, the
following minimum performance standards shall be met for the restoration of a critical area; provided, that if
the violator can demonstrate that greater functional and habitat values can be obtained, these standards may be
modified:
a. The historic structural and functional values shall be restored, including water quality and habitat
functions;
b. The historic soil types and configuration shall be replicated;
c. The critical area and buffers shall be replanted with native vegetation that replicates the vegetation
historically found on the site in species types, sizes, and densities. The historic functions and values should
be replicated at the location of the alteration; and
d. Information demonstrating compliance with the requirements in ECDC 23.40.130, Mitigation plan
requirements, shall be submitted to the city planning division.
2. For alterations to flood and geological hazards, the following minimum performance standards shall be met
for the restoration of a critical area; provided, that if the violator can demonstrate that greater safety can be
obtained, these standards may be modified:
a. The hazard shall be reduced to a level equal to, or less than, the predevelopment hazard;
b. Any risk of personal injury resulting from the alteration shall be eliminated or minimized; and
c. The hazard area and buffers shall be replanted with native vegetation sufficient to minimize the hazard.
D. Site Investigations. The director is authorized to make site inspections and take such actions as are necessary to
enforce this title. The director shall present proper credentials and make a reasonable effort to contact any property
owner before entering onto private property.
E. Penalties. Any person, party, firm, corporation, or other legal entity convicted of violating any of the provisions
of this title shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to penalties not to exceed a square footage cost of $3.00 per
square foot of impacted critical area and critical area buffer and/or a per tree penalty consistent with ECDC
23.10.100(C) 18.45.070(B) an (Q. Any development carried out contrary to the provisions of this title shall
constitute a public nuisance and may be enjoined as provided by the statutes of the state of Washington. The city of
Edmonds may levy civil penalties against any person, party, firm, corporation, or other legal entity for violation of
any of the provisions of this title. The civil penalty shall be assessed as prescribed in ECDC ' 8.4 5
8.^�5.23.10.100(C). [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3828 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
Section 23.50.040 Development standards — Wetlands.
A. Activities may only be permitted in a wetland buffer if the applicant can show that the proposed activity will not
degrade the functions and functional performance of the wetland and other critical areas.
B. Activities and uses shall be prohibited in wetlands and wetland buffers, except as provided for in this title.
C. Category I Wetlands. Activities and uses shall be prohibited from Category I wetlands, except as provided for in
the public agency and utility exception, reasonable use exception, and variance sections of this title.
Packet Pg. 333
7.4.a
D. Category II Wetlands. With respect to activities proposed in Category II wetlands, the following standards shall
apply:
1. Water -dependent activities may be allowed where there are no practicable alternatives that would have a less
adverse impact on the wetland, its buffers and other critical areas.
2. Where non -water -dependent activities are proposed, it shall be presumed that alternative locations are
available, and activities and uses shall be prohibited, unless the applicant demonstrates that:
a. The basic project purpose cannot be accomplished as proposed and successfully avoid, or result in less
adverse impact on, a wetland on another site or sites in the general region; and
b. All alternative designs of the project as proposed, such as a reduction in the size, scope, configuration,
or density of the project, would not avoid or result in less of an adverse impact on a wetland or its buffer.
E. Category III and IV Wetlands. Activities and uses that result in unavoidable and necessary impacts may be
permitted in Category III and IV wetlands and associated buffers in accordance with an approved critical areas
report and mitigation plan.
F. Wetland Buffers.
1. Buffer Requirements. The following buffer widths have been established in accordance with the best
available science. They are based on the category of wetland and the habitat score as determined by a qualified
wetland professional using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014
Update (Ecology Publication No. 14-06-029, or as revised and approved by Ecology). The adjacent land use
intensity is assumed to be high.
a. For wetlands that score six points or more for habitat function, the buffers in subsection (F)(1)(e) of this
section can be used if both of the following criteria are met:
i. A relatively undisturbed, vegetated corridor at least 100 feet wide is protected between the wetland
and any other priority habitats as defined by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife.
The corridor must be protected for the entire distance between the wetland and the priority habitat by
some type of legal protection such as a conservation easement.
Presence or absence of a nearby habitat must be confirmed by a qualified biologist. If no option for
providing a corridor is available, subsection (F)(1)(e) of this section may be used with the required
measures in subsection (F)(1)(f) of this section alone.
ii. The measures in subsection (F)(1)(f) of this section are implemented, where applicable, to minimize
the impacts of the adjacent land uses.
b. For wetlands that score three to five habitat points, only the measures in subsection (F)(1)(f) of this
section are required for the use of subsection (F)(1)(e) of this section.
c. If an applicant chooses not to apply the mitigation measures in subsection (F)(1)(f) of this section, or is
unable to provide a protected corridor where available, then subsection (F)(1)(g) of this section must be
used.
d. The buffer widths in subsections (F)(1)(e) and (F)(1)(g) of this section assume that the buffer is
vegetated with a native plant community appropriate for the ecoregion. If the existing buffer is
unvegetated, sparsely vegetated, or vegetated with invasive species that do not perform needed functions,
the buffer should either be planted to create the appropriate plant community or the buffer should be
widened to ensure that adequate functions of the buffer are provided.
e. Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington If Subsection (F)(1)(f) of This Section Is
Implemented and Corridor Provided.
Packet Pg. 334
7.4.a
Buffer Width (in Feet) Based on Habitat Score
Wetland Category
Habitat Score:
Habitat Score:
Habitat Score:
3-5
6-7
8-9
Category I:
75
110
225
Based on total score
Category I:
190
225
Bogs and wetlands of high
conservation value
Category I:
75
110
225
Forested
Category I:
225
Interdunal
(buffer width not based on habitat scores)
Category I:
150
Estuarine and coastal
(buffer width not based on habitat scores)
lagoons
Category II:
75
110
225
Based on score
Category II:
110
Interdunal wetlands
(buffer width not based on habitat scores)
Category II:
110
Estuarine and coastal
(buffer width not based on habitat scores)
lagoons
Category III (all)
60
110
225
Category IV (all)
40
f. Required Measures to Minimize Impacts to Wetlands (All Measures Are Required If Applicable to a
Specific Proposal).
Disturbance
Required Measures to Minimize Impacts
Lights
Direct lights away from wetland
Noise
Locate activity that generates noise away from wetland
If warranted, enhance existing buffer with native vegetation planting adjacent to noise source
For activities that generate relatively continuous, potentially disruptive noise, such as certain heavy industry
or mining, establish an additional 10-foot heavily vegetated buffer strip immediately adjacent to the outer
wetland buffer
Toxic runoff
Route all new, untreated runoff away from wetland while ensuring wetland is not dewatered
Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 150 feet of wetland
Apply integrated pest management
Storm wxsscx••••,te_ Stormwater
Retrofit stonn wa4e_ storrnwater detention and treatment for roads and existing adjacent development
runoff
Prevent channelized flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer
Use low -intensity development techniques (for more information see stoFm watestormwater ordinance and
manual)
Change in water regime
Infiltrate or treat, detain, and disperse into buffer new runoff from impervious surfaces and new lawns
Pets and human disturbance
Use privacy fencing or plant dense vegetation to delineate buffer edge and to discourage disturbance using
vegetation appropriate for the ecoregion
Place wetland and its buffer in a separate tract or protect with a conservation easement
Dust
Use best management practices to control dust
g. Wetland Buffer Requirements for Western Washington If Subsection (F)(1)(f) of This Section Is Not
Implemented or Corridor Not Provided.
Packet Pg. 335
7.4.a
Buffer Width (in Feet) Based on Habitat Score
Wetland Category
Habitat Score:
Habitat Score:
Habitat Score:
3-5
6-7
8-9
Category I:
100
150
300
Based on total score
Category I:
250
300
Bogs and wetlands of high
conservation value
Category I:
100
150
300
Forested
Category I:
300
Interdunal
(buffer width not based on habitat scores)
Category I:
200
Estuarine and coastal
(buffer width not based on habitat scores)
lagoons
Category II:
100
150
300
Based on score
Category II:
150
Interdunal wetlands
(buffer width not based on habitat scores)
Category II:
150
Estuarine and coastal
(buffer width not based on habitat scores)
lagoons
Category III (all)
80
150
300
Category IV (all)
50
2. Increased Wetland Buffer Widths. The director shall require increased buffer widths in accordance with the
recommendations of an experienced, qualified professional wetland scientist and the best available science on a
case -by -case basis when a larger buffer is necessary to protect wetland functions and values based on
site -specific characteristics. This determination shall be based on one or more of the following criteria:
a. A larger buffer is needed to protect other critical areas;
b. The buffer or adjacent uplands has a slope greater than 15 percent or is susceptible to erosion and
standard erosion control measures will not prevent adverse impacts to the wetland;
c. The buffer area has minimal vegetative cover. In lieu of increasing the buffer width where existing
buffer vegetation is inadequate to protect the wetland functions and values, development and
implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan in accordance with this subsection (F)(3) may
substitute; or
d. The wetland and/or buffer is occupied by a federally listed threatened or endangered species, a bald
eagle nest, a great blue heron rookery, or a species of local importance; and it is determined by the director
that an increased buffer width is necessary to protect the species.
3. Measurement of Wetland Buffers. All buffers shall be measured from the wetland boundary as surveyed in
the field. The buffer for a wetland created, restored, or enhanced as compensation for approved wetland
alterations shall be the same as the buffer required for the category of the created, restored, or enhanced
wetland.
4. Buffer Consistency. All mitigation sites shall have buffers consistent with the buffer requirements of this
chapter.
Packet Pg. 336
7.4.a
5. Buffer Maintenance. Except as otherwise specified or allowed in accordance with this title, wetland buffers
shall be retained in an undisturbed or enhanced condition. Removal of invasive nonnative weeds is required for
the duration of the mitigation bond.
G. Wetland Buffer Modifications and Uses.
1. Where wetland or buffer alterations are permitted by the city of Edmonds, the applicant shall mitigate
impacts to achieve no net loss of wetland acreage and functions consistent with ECDC 23.50.050 and other
applicable provisions of this title.
2. At the discretion of the director, standard wetland buffers may be averaged or reduced when consistent with
all criteria in this subsection (G). Wetland buffer averaging with enhancement shall be preferred over wetland
buffer reduction with enhancement. Wetland buffer reduction shall only be approved by the director when
buffer averaging cannot be accomplished on site.
3. Wetland Buffer Width Averaging with Buffer Enhancement. The director may allow modification of a
standard wetland buffer width in accordance with an approved critical areas report and the best available
science on a case -by -case basis by averaging buffer widths. Any allowance for averaging buffer widths shall
only be granted concomitant to the development and implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan for
areas of buffer degradation. Only those portions of a wetland buffer existing within the project area or subject
parcel shall be considered the total standard buffer for buffer averaging. Averaging of buffer widths may only
be allowed where a qualified professional wetland scientist demonstrates that:
a. The buffer averaging and enhancement plan provides evidence that wetland functions and values will
be:
i. Increased or retained through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer
vegetation is generally intact; or
ii. Increased through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is
inadequate to protect the functions and values of the wetland;
b. The wetland contains variations in sensitivity due to existing physical characteristics or the character of
the buffer varies in slope, soils, or vegetation, and the wetland would benefit from a wider buffer in places
and would not be adversely impacted by a narrower buffer in other places;
c. The total area contained in the buffer area, or the total buffer area existing on a subject parcel for
wetlands extending off site, after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within a
standard buffer; and
d. The buffer width at any single location is not reduced by more than 25 percent of the standard buffer
width.
4. Buffer Width Reductions through Buffer Enhancement. At the discretion of the director, and only when
buffer averaging cannot be accomplished on site, wetland buffer width reductions (or approval of standard
buffer widths for wetlands where existing buffer conditions require increased buffer widths) may be granted
concomitant to the development and implementation of a wetland buffer enhancement plan for Category III and
IV wetlands only. Approval of a wetland buffer enhancement plan shall, at the discretion of the director, allow
for wetland buffer width reductions by no more than 25 percent of the standard width; provided, that:
a. The plan provides evidence that wetland functions and values will be:
i. Increased or retained through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer
vegetation is generally intact; or
ii. Increased through plan implementation for those wetlands where existing buffer vegetation is
inadequate to protect the functions and values of the wetland;
Packet Pg. 337
7.4.a
b. The plan documents existing native plant densities and provides for increases in buffer native plant
densities to no less than three feet on center for shrubs and eight feet on center for trees;
c. The plan requires monitoring and maintenance to ensure success in accordance with ECDC
23.40.130(D); and
d. The plan specifically documents methodology and provides performance standards including but not
limited to:
i. Percent vegetative cover;
ii. Percent invasive species cover;
iii. Species richness; and
iv. Amount of large woody debris.
5. Buffer Uses. The following uses may be permitted within a wetland buffer in accordance with the review
procedures of this title; provided, they are not prohibited by any other applicable law and they are conducted in
a manner so as to minimize impacts to the buffer and adjacent wetland:
a. All activities allowed by ECDC 23.50.020, Allowed activities — Wetlands.
b. Conservation and Restoration Activities. Conservation or restoration activities aimed at protecting the
soil, water, vegetation, or wildlife.
c. Passive Recreation. Passive recreation facilities designed and in accordance with an approved critical
area report, including:
i. Walkways and trails; provided, that those pathways are generally constructed with a surface that
does not interfere with substrate permeability, are generally located only in the outer 25 percent of
wetland buffers, and are located to avoid removal of significant trees. Where existing legally
established development has reduced the width of the wetland buffer, trails may be placed in the outer
25 percent of the remaining wetland buffer. The trail shall be no more than five feet in width and for
pedestrian use only. Raised boardwalks utilizing nontreated pilings may be acceptable. The director
may allow trails within the inner 25 percent of wetland buffers when required to provide access to
wildlife viewing structures, fishing access areas, or connections to other trail facilities;
ii. Wildlife viewing structures; and
iii. Fishing access areas down to the water's edge that shall be no larger than six feet.
d. StaFm Wa4e Stormwater Management Facilities. Stel:FflStormwater management facilities,
limited to outfalls, pipes and conveyance systems, storm water stormwater dispersion outfalls and
bioswales, may be allowed within the outer 25 percent of a standard or modified buffer for Category III or
IV wetlands only; provided, that:
i. No other location is feasible; and
ii. The location and function of such facilities will not degrade the functions or values of the wetland.
iii. Storm Stormwater management facilities are not allowed in buffers of Category I or II
wetlands.
iv. Projects shall also comply with all applicable requirements in Chapter 18.30 ECDC, Storm Water
Stormwater Management, including Minimum Requirement No. 8, Wetland Protection.
H. Signs and Fencing of Wetlands.
Packet Pg. 338
7.4.a
1. Temporary Markers. The outer perimeter of the wetland or buffer and the limits of those areas to be
disturbed pursuant to an approved permit or authorization shall be marked in the field in such a way as to
ensure that no unauthorized intrusion will occur and are subject to inspection by the director prior to the
commencement of permitted activities. The director may require the use of fencing to protect wetlands from
disturbance and intrusion. Temporary marking shall be maintained throughout construction and shall not be
removed until permanent signs, if required, are in place.
2. Permanent Signs. As a condition of any permit or authorization issued pursuant to this chapter, the director
may require the applicant to install permanent signs along the boundary of a wetland or buffer.
a. Permanent signs shall be made of an enamel -coated metal face and attached to a metal post or another
nontreated material of equal durability. Signs must be posted at an interval of one per lot or every 50 feet,
whichever is less, and must be maintained by the property owner in perpetuity. The sign shall be worded
as follows or with alternative language approved by the director:
Protected Wetland Area
Do Not Disturb
Contact the City of Edmonds
Regarding Uses and Restrictions
b. The provisions of subsection (H)(2)(a) of this section may be modified as necessary to assure protection
of sensitive features or wildlife.
3. Permanent Fencing. Permanent fencing shall be required at the outer edge of the critical area buffer under the
following circumstances; provided, that the director may waive this requirement:
a. As part of any development proposal for single-family plats, single-family short plats, multifamily,
mixed use, and commercial development where the director determines that such fencing is necessary to
protect the functions of the critical area; provided, that breaks in permanent fencing may be allowed for
access to permitted buffer uses (subsection (G)(5) of this section);
b. As part of development proposals for parks where the adjacent proposed use is active recreation and the
director determines that such fencing is necessary to protect the functions of the critical area;
c. When buffer averaging is employed as part of a development proposal;
d. When buffer reductions are employed as part of a development proposal; or
e. At the director's discretion to protect the values and functions of a critical area.
1. Additions to Structures Existing within Wetlands and/or Wetland Buffers.
1. Additions to legally constructed structures existing within wetlands or wetland buffers that increase the
footprint of development or impervious surfacing shall be permitted consistent with the development standards
of this section; provided, that a wetland and/or buffer enhancement plan is provided to mitigate for impacts
consistent with this title; and provided, that all impacts from temporary disturbances within the critical area
buffer shall be addressed through use of best management plans and buffer enhancement plantings during and
following construction of the allowed alteration. Provisions for standard wetland buffers, wetland buffer
averaging with enhancement, and buffer reductions with enhancement require applicants to locate such
additions in accordance with the following sequencing:
a. Outside of the standard wetland buffer;
b. Outside of a wetland buffer averaged (with enhancement) per subsection (G)(3) of this section;
Packet Pg. 339
7.4.a
c. Outside of a wetland buffer reduced (with enhancement) per subsection (G)(4) of this section;
d. Outside of the inner 25 percent of the standard wetland buffer width with no more than 300 square feet
of structure addition footprint within the inner 50 percent of the standard wetland buffer width; provided,
that enhancement is provided at a minimum three -to -one (3: 1) ratio (enhancement -to -impact);
e. Outside of the inner 25 percent of the standard wetland buffer width with no more than 500 square feet
of new footprint within the inner 50 percent of the standard wetland buffer width; provided, that
enhancement is provided at a minimum five -to -one (5:1) ratio (enhancement -to -impact), and that stei:frr
water stormwater low impact development (LID) techniques and other measures are included as part of the
wetland/buffer enhancement plan.
2. Where meeting wetland buffer enhancement requirements required by subsection (I)(1) of this section would
result in enhancement that is separated from the critical area due to uncommon property ownership, alternative
enhancement approaches may be approved by the director. Alternative approaches could include a vegetated
rain garden that receives storm runoff, replacement of existing impervious surfaces with pervious materials, or
other approaches that provide ecological benefits to the adjacent critical area.
3. Additions to legally constructed structures existing within wetlands or wetland buffers that cannot be
accommodated in accordance with the sequencing in subsection (I)(1) of this section (e.g., additions proposed
within a wetland or the inner 25 percent of a standard buffer width) may be permitted at the director's
discretion as a variance subject to review by the city hearing examiner and the provisions of ECDC 23.40.210
J. Development Proposals within the Footprint of Existing Development. New development shall be allowed within
the footprint of existing development occurring within a wetland buffer; provided, that the following conditions are
met:
1. The footprint of existing development was legally established, and is consistent with the definition provided
in ECDC 23.40.005;
2. The proposed development within the footprint of existing development is sited as far away from the wetland
edge as is feasible;
3. As part of the development proposal, opportunities to reduce the footprint of existing development are
implemented where such reduction would increase the buffer width adjacent to the wetland and not represent
an undue burden given the scale of the proposed development;
4. The proposed development includes enhancement to the adjacent wetland and associated buffer in order to
improve functions degraded by previous development;
5. Enhancement is provided as wetland or buffer enhancement for an equivalent area of the footprint of the
newly proposed development within the footprint of existing development occurring in a wetland buffer, or
through an alternative approach approved by the director that restores degraded functions of the wetland and
remaining buffer; and
6. Impacts from temporary disturbances within the wetland buffer shall be addressed through use of best
management plans and buffer enhancement plantings during and following construction of the allowed
alteration.
K. Exemptions and Allowed Uses in Wetlands. The following wetlands may be exempt from the requirement to
avoid impacts (ECDC 23.40.120(B)(1)), and they may be filled if the impacts are fully mitigated based on the
remaining actions in ECDC 23.40.120(B)(2) through (6). If available, impacts should be mitigated through the
purchase of credits from an in -lieu fee program or mitigation bank, consistent with the terms and conditions of the
program or bank. In order to verify the following conditions, a critical area report for wetlands meeting the
requirements in ECDC 23.50.030 must be submitted:
1. All isolated Category IV wetlands less than 4,000 square feet that:
Packet Pg. 340
7.4.a
a. Are not associated with riparian areas or their buffers;
b. Are not associated with shorelines of the state or their associated buffers;
c. Are not part of a wetland mosaic;
d. Do not score six or more points for habitat function based on the 2014 update to the Washington State
Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update (Ecology Publication No. 14-06-029, or as
revised and approved by Ecology); and
e. Do not contain a priority habitat or a priority area for a priority species identified by the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife, do not contain federally listed species or their critical habitat, or species
of local importance identified in Chapter 23.90 ECDC.
2. Wetlands less than 1,000 square feet that meet the above criteria and do not contain federally listed species
or their critical habitat are exempt from the buffer provisions contained in this chapter. [Ord. 4127 § 3, 2018;
Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
Section 23.80.010 Designation, rating and mapping — Geologically hazardous areas.
Geologically hazardous areas include areas susceptible to erosion, land sliding, earthquake, or other geological
events. They pose a threat to the health and safety of eitizen residents when incompatible development is sited in
areas of significant hazard. Such incompatible development may not only place itself at risk, but also may increase
the hazard to surrounding development and use. Areas susceptible to one or more of the following types of hazards
shall be designated as a geologically hazardous area:
A. Erosion hazard;
B. Landslide hazard; and
C. Seismic hazard. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
Section 23.80.040 Allowed activities — Geologically hazardous areas.
The following activities are allowed in geologically hazardous areas as consistent with ECDC 23.40.220, Allowed
activities, Chapter 19.10 ECDC, Building Permits — Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Areas, and Chapter
18.30 ECDC, Storm Wate Stormwater Management, and do not require submission of a critical area report:
A. Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Except for installation of fences and as otherwise provided for in this title,
only those activities approved and permitted consistent with an approved critical areas report in accordance with this
title shall be allowed in erosion or landslide hazard areas.
B. Seismic Hazard Areas. The following activities are allowed within seismic hazard areas:
1. Construction of new buildings with less than 2,500 square feet of floor area or roof area, whichever is
greater, and which are not residential structures or used as places of employment or public assembly;
2. Additions to existing single -story residences that are 250 square feet or less; and
3. Installation of fences. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
Packet Pg. 341
7.4.a
Section 23.80.070 Development standards — Specific hazards.
A. Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing erosion or landslide hazards shall meet the
requirements of ECDC 23.80.060, Development standards — General requirements, and the specific following
requirements:
1. Minimum Building Setback. The minimum setback shall be the distance required to ensure the proposed
structure will not be at risk from landslides for the life of the structure, considered to be 120 years, and will not
cause an increased risk of landslides taking place on or off the site. A setback shall be established from all
edges of landslide hazard areas. The size of the setback shall be determined by the director consistent with
recommendations provided in the geotechnical report to eliminate or minimize the risk of property damage,
death, or injury resulting from landslides caused in whole or part by the development, based upon review of
and concurrence with a critical areas report prepared by a qualified professional;
2. Buffer Requirements. A buffer may be established with specific requirements and limitations, including but
not limited to, drainage, grading, irrigation, and vegetation. Buffer requirements shall be determined by the
director consistent with recommendations provided in the geotechnical report to eliminate or minimize the risk
of property damage, death, or injury resulting from landslides caused in whole or part by activities within the
buffer area, based upon review of and concurrence with a critical areas report prepared by a qualified
professional;
3. Alterations. Alterations of an erosion or landslide hazard area, minimum building setback and/or buffer may
only occur for activities for which a hazards analysis is submitted and certifies that:
a. The alteration will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond
predevelopment conditions;
b. The alteration will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties; and
c. Such alterations will not adversely impact other critical areas;
4. Design Standards within Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Development within an erosion or landslide
hazard area and/or buffer shall be designed to meet the following basic requirements unless it can be
demonstrated that an alternative design that deviates from one or more of these standards provides greater
long-term slope stability while meeting all other provisions of this title. The requirement for long-term slope
stability shall exclude designs that require regular and periodic maintenance to maintain their level of function.
The basic development design standards are:
a. The proposed development shall not decrease the factor of safety for landslide occurrences below the
limits of 1.5 for static conditions and 1.2 for dynamic conditions. If stability at the proposed development
site is below these limits, the proposed development shall provide practicable approaches to reduce risk to
human safety and improve the factor of safety for landsliding. In no case shall the existing factor of safety
be reduced for the subject property or adjacent properties;
b. Structures and improvements shall be clustered to avoid geologically hazardous areas and other critical
areas;
c. Structures and improvements shall minimize alterations to the natural contour of the slope, and
foundations shall be tiered where possible to conform to existing topography;
d. Structures and improvements shall be located to preserve the most critical portion of the site and its
natural landforms and vegetation;
e. The proposed development shall not result in greater risk or a need for increased buffers on neighboring
properties;
f. The use of retaining walls that allow the maintenance of existing natural slope area is preferred over
graded artificial slopes; and
Packet Pg. 342
7.4.a
g. Development shall be designed to minimize impervious lot coverage;
5. Vegetation Retention. Unless otherwise provided or as part of an approved alteration, removal of vegetation
from an erosion or landslide hazard area or related buffer shall be prohibited;
6. Seasonal Restriction. Clearing shall be allowed only from May 1 st to October 1 st of each year; provided, that
the director may extend or shorten the dry season on a case -by -case basis depending on actual weather
conditions, except that timber harvest, not including brush clearing or stump removal, may be allowed pursuant
to an approved forest practice permit issued by the city of Edmonds or the Washington State Department of
Natural Resources;
7. Point Discharges. Point discharges from surface water facilities and roof drains onto or upstream from an
erosion or landslide hazard area shall be prohibited except as follows:
a. Conveyed via continuous storm pipe downslope to a point where there are no erosion hazard areas
downstream from the discharge;
b. Discharged at flow durations matching predeveloped conditions, with adequate energy dissipation, into
existing channels that previously conveyed stom wate stormwater runoff in the predeveloped state; or
c. Dispersed discharge upslope of the steep slope onto a low -gradient, undisturbed buffer demonstrated to
be adequate to infiltrate all surface and stefm wa4e stormwater runoff, and where it can be demonstrated
that such discharge will not increase the saturation of the slope; and
8. Prohibited Development. On -site sewage disposal systems, including drain fields, shall be prohibited within
erosion and landslide hazard areas and related buffers.
B. Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area. In addition to the requirements of this chapter, development
proposals for lands located within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area as indicated on the critical areas
inventory shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.10 ECDC.
C. Seismic Hazard Areas. Activities proposed to be located in seismic hazard areas shall meet the standards of
ECDC 23.80.060, Development standards — General requirements. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3527 § 2,
2004].
Section 23.90.040 Development standards — Specific habitats.
A. Endangered, Threatened, and Sensitive Species.
1. No development shall be allowed within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or buffer with which
state or federally endangered, threatened, or sensitive species have a primary association, except that which is
provided for by a management plan established by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife or
applicable state or federal agency.
2. Whenever activities are proposed adjacent to a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area with which state or
federally endangered, threatened, or sensitive species have a primary association, such area shall be protected
through the application of protection measures in accordance with a critical areas report prepared by a qualified
professional and approved by the director. Approval for alteration of land adjacent to the fish and wildlife
habitat conservation area or its buffer shall not occur prior to consultation with the Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife for animal species, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources for plant species,
and other appropriate federal or state agencies.
3. Bald eagle habitat is subject to the Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Washington State bald
eagle protection rules (WAC 232-12-292) shall not be required as long as bald eagles are not listed as a state
endangered or threatened species.
B. Anadromous Fish.
Packet Pg. 343
7.4.a
1. All activities, uses, and alterations proposed to be located in water bodies used by anadromous fish or in
areas that affect such water bodies shall give special consideration to the preservation and enhancement of
anadromous fish habitat, including, but not limited to, adhering to the following standards:
a. Activities shall be timed to occur only during the allowable work window as designated by the
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for the applicable species;
b. An alternative alignment or location for the activity is not feasible;
c. The activity is designed so that it will not degrade the functions or values of the fish habitat or other
critical areas;
d. Shoreline erosion control measures shall be designed to use bioengineering methods or soft armoring
techniques, according to an approved critical areas report; and
e. Any impacts to the functions or values of the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area are mitigated in
accordance with an approved critical areas report.
2. Structures that prevent the migration of salmonids shall not be allowed in the portion of water bodies
currently or historically used by anadromous fish. Fish bypass facilities shall be provided that allow the
upstream migration of adult fish and shall prevent fry and juveniles migrating downstream from being trapped
or harmed.
3. Fills, when authorized, shall not adversely impact anadromous fish or their habitat or shall mitigate any
unavoidable impacts and shall only be allowed for a water -dependent use.
C. Retention of Vegetation on Subdividable, Undeveloped Parcels. As a provision of this title, the director shall
require retention of a minimum of 30 percent of native vegetation on undeveloped (or redeveloped), subdividable
lands zoned as RS-12 or RS-20 per Chapter 16.10 ECDC. This standard for development shall apply to all
undeveloped (or redeveloped), subdividable lands zoned RS-12 or RS-20 that contain a landslide hazard area as
defined by ECDC 23.80.020(B); a stream or stream buffer; or a wetland or wetland buffer, except for as provided in
subsection (C)(4) of this section. This provision for native vegetation retention will provide increased protection of
fish and wildlife habitat throughout the Edmonds jurisdiction, and shall be applied consistent with the following
criteria:
1. Achieving the minimum 30 percent retention requirement for native vegetation shall be determined by
assessing the existing site area that supports native vegetation. For purposes of this provision, areas that support
native vegetation shall include areas dominated by plant species which are indigenous to the Puget Sound
region, which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site, and within which native trees
over six inches in diameter at breast height (dbh) make up more than 40 percent of the canopy cover.
2. The goal of 30 percent native vegetation can be met through maintaining existing native vegetation,
establishing native vegetation, or a combination of both.
3. A vegetation management plan, subject to the approval of the director, is required for approval of the
proposed development.
4. For undeveloped (or redeveloped), subdividable lands zoned as RS-12 or RS-20 that currently do not support
any native vegetation areas meeting minimum requirements in subsection (C)(1) of this section, the director
may waive the requirements of this provision.
D. Streams. No alteration to a stream or stream buffer shall be permitted unless consistent with the provisions of this
title and the specific standards for development outlined below.
1. Standard Stream Buffer Widths. Buffers for streams shall be measured on each side of the stream, from the
ordinary high water mark. The following shall be the standard buffer widths for streams based upon the
Washington State Department of Natural Resources water typing system and further classification based upon
fish presence (fishbearing vs. nonfishbearing) for the Type F streams existing in the city of Edmonds:
Packet Pg. 344
7.4.a
a. Type S: 150 feet;
b. Type F anadromous fishbearing stream adjacent to reaches with anadromous fish access: 100 feet;
c. Type F anadromous fishbearing stream adjacent to reaches without anadromous fish access: 75 feet;
d. Type F nonanadromous fishbearing stream: 75 feet;
e. Type Np: 50 feet;
f. Type Ns: 40 feet.
General areas and stream reaches with access for anadromous fish are indicated on the city of Edmonds critical
areas inventory. The potential for anadromous fish access shall be confirmed in the field by a qualified
biologist as part of critical areas review and determination of standard stream buffer widths.
2. Reduced Stream Buffer Widths. Standard stream buffer widths may be reduced by no more than 25 percent
of the standard stream buffer width concomitant to development and implementation of a stream buffer
enhancement plan approved by the director. Reduced stream buffer widths shall only be approved by the
director if a stream buffer enhancement plan conclusively demonstrates that enhancement of the reduced buffer
area will not degrade the quantitative and qualitative functions and values of the buffer area in terms of fish and
stream protection and the provision of wildlife habitat. Stream buffer enhancement plans must meet the specific
requirements of ECDC 23.40.110, 23.40.120 and 23.40.130 and:
a. The buffer enhancement plan proposed as part of buffer reduction provides evidence that functions and
values in terms of stream and wildlife protections will be:
i. Increased or retained through plan implementation for those streams where existing buffer vegetation
is generally intact; or
ii. Increased through plan implementation for those streams where existing buffer vegetation is
inadequate to protect the functions and values of the stream;
b. The plan documents existing native plant densities and provides for increases in buffer native plant
densities to no less than three feet on center for shrubs and eight feet on center for trees;
c. The plan requires monitoring and maintenance to ensure success for a minimum of five years in
accordance with ECDC 23.40.130(D) and (E); and
d. The plan specifically documents methodology and provides performance standards for assessing
increases in stream buffer functioning as related to:
i. Water quality protection;
ii. Provision of wildlife habitat;
iii. Protection of anadromous fisheries;
iv. Enhancement of fish habitat; and
v. Restricting intrusion and disturbance.
3. Stream Buffer Width Averaging with Enhancement. The director may allow modification of a standard
stream buffer width in accordance with an approved critical areas report and the best available science on a
case -by -case basis by averaging buffer widths. Any allowance for averaging buffer widths shall only be granted
concomitant to the development and implementation of a buffer enhancement plan for areas of buffer
degradation. Only those portions of a stream buffer existing within the project area or subject parcel shall be
Packet Pg. 345
7.4.a
considered in the total buffer area for buffer averaging. Averaging of buffer widths may only be allowed where
a qualified professional demonstrates that:
a. The buffer enhancement plan proposed as part of buffer averaging provides evidence that functions and
values in terms of stream and wildlife protections will be:
i. Increased or retained through plan implementation for those streams where existing buffer vegetation
is generally intact; or
ii. Increased through plan implementation for those streams where existing buffer vegetation is
inadequate to protect the functions and values of the stream;
b. The total area contained in the buffer area, or the total buffer area existing on a subject parcel for a stream
extending off site, after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within the standard buffer; and
c. The buffer width at any single location is not reduced by more than 25 percent of standard width.
4. Additions to Structures Existing within Stream Buffers.
a. Additions to legally constructed structures existing within stream buffers that increase the footprint of
development or impervious surfacing shall be permitted consistent with the development standards of this
chapter (ECDC 23.90.030 and this section); provided, that a buffer enhancement plan is provided to
mitigate for impacts consistent with this title; and provided, that all impacts from temporary disturbances
within the critical area buffer shall be addressed through use of best management plans and buffer
enhancement plantings during and following construction of the allowed alteration. Provisions for
standard stream buffers, stream buffer averaging with enhancement, and buffer reductions through
enhancement require applicants to locate such additions in accordance with the following sequencing:
i. Outside of the standard stream buffer;
ii. Outside of a stream buffer averaged (with enhancement) per subsection (D)(3) of this section;
iii. Outside of a stream buffer reduced (with enhancement) per subsection (D)(2) of this section;
iv. Outside of the inner 25 percent of the standard stream buffer width with no more than 300 square
feet of structure addition footprint within the inner 50 percent of the standard stream buffer width;
provided, that enhancement is provided at a minimum three -to -one (3:1) ratio
(enhancement -to -impact); or
v. Outside of the inner 25 percent of the standard stream buffer width with no more than 500 square
feet of new footprint within the inner 50 percent of the standard stream buffer width; provided, that
enhancement is provided at a minimum five -to -one (5:1) ratio (enhancement -to -impact), and that storm
water stormwater low impact development (LID) techniques or other measures that enhance existing
buffer condition are included as part of the stream buffer enhancement plan.
b. Where meeting stream buffer enhancement requirements required by subsection (D)(4)(a) of this
section would result in enhancement that is separated from the critical area due to uncommon property
ownership, alternative enhancement approaches may be approved by the director. Alternative approaches
could include a vegetated rain garden that receives storm runoff, replacement of existing impervious
surfaces with pervious materials, or other approaches that provide ecological benefits to the adjacent
critical area.
c. Additions to legally constructed structures existing within stream buffers that cannot be accommodated
in accordance with the above sequencing (i.e., additions proposed within the inner 25 percent of a standard
buffer width) may be permitted at the director's discretion as a variance subject to review by the city
hearing examiner and the provisions of ECDC 23.40.210.
Packet Pg. 346
7.4.a
5. Development Proposals within the Footprint of Existing Development. New development shall be allowed
within the footprint of existing development occurring within a stream buffer; provided, that the following
conditions are met:
a. The footprint of existing development was legally established, and is consistent with the definition
provided in ECDC 23.40.005;
b. The proposed development within the footprint of existing development is sited as far away from the
stream edge as is feasible;
c. As part of the development proposal, opportunities to reduce the footprint of existing development are
implemented where such reduction would increase the buffer width adjacent to the stream and not
represent an undue burden given the scale of the proposed development;
d. The proposed development includes enhancement to the adjacent remaining stream buffer in order to
improve functions degraded by previous development;
e. Enhancement is provided as buffer enhancement for an equivalent area of the footprint of the newly
proposed development within the footprint of existing development occurring in stream buffer, or through
an alternative approach approved by the director that restores degraded functions of the wetland and
remaining buffer; and
f. Impacts from temporary disturbances within the stream buffer shall be addressed through use of best
management plans and buffer enhancement plantings during and following construction of the allowed
alteration.
6. Stream Crossings. Stream crossings may be allowed only if all reasonable construction techniques and best
management practices are used to avoid disturbance to the stream bed or bank. Upon completion of
construction, the area affected shall be restored to an appropriate grade, replanted with native species and/or
otherwise protected according to a stream mitigation and buffer enhancement plan approved by the director,
and maintained and monitored per the requirements of ECDC 23.40.110, 23.40.120 and 23.40.130 and
providing for buffer enhancement in accordance with the requirements of subsection (D)(2) of this section. In
addition, the applicant must demonstrate that best management practices will be used during construction to
provide the following:
a. Fisheries protection, including no interference with fish migration or spawning;
b. All crossings shall be constructed during summer low flow periods and shall be timed to avoid stream
disturbance during periods when stream use is critical to salmonids;
c. Crossings shall not occur over salmonid spawning areas unless no other possible crossing site exists;
d. Crossings and culverted portions of the stream shall be minimized to the extent feasible and serve
multiple purposes and multiple lots whenever possible;
e. Roads may cross streams only on previously approved rights -of -way, provided no practical alternative
exists and adequate provision is made to protect and/or enhance the stream through appropriate mitigation.
Roads shall be designed and located to conform to topography, and maintained to prevent erosion and
restriction of the natural movement of ground water as it affects the stream;
f. Roads and utilities shall be designed in conjunction to minimize the area of disturbance to the stream;
g. Roads shall be constructed so as to minimize adverse impacts on the hydrologic quality of the stream or
associated habitat to a degree acceptable to the city;
h. An alternative alignment or location with less impact is not feasible; and
i. The crossing will be designed as near as perpendicular with the water body as possible.
Packet Pg. 347
7.4.a
7. Trails. After reviewing the proposed development and technical reports, the director may determine that a
pedestrian -only trail may be allowed in a stream buffer; provided, pervious materials are used, all appropriate
provision is made to protect water quality, and all applicable permit requirements have been met. No motorized
vehicles shall be allowed within a stream or its buffer except as required for necessary maintenance or security.
Vegetative edges, structural barriers, signs or other measures must be provided wherever necessary to protect
streams by limiting vehicular access to designated public use or interpretive areas.
8. Stefm Wate Stormwater Management Facilities. Storm wate Stormwater management facilities, limited to
outfalls, pipes and conveyance systems, storm wate stormwater dispersion outfalls and bioswales, may be
allowed within stream buffers; provided, that:
a. No other location is feasible;
b. Pipes and conveyance facilities will be in the outer 25 percent of the buffer;
c. Storm wate Stormwater dispersion outfalls, bioswales, and bioretention facilities may be allowed
anywhere within stream buffers;
d. Such facilities are designed consistent with requirements of Chapter 18.30 ECDC; and
e. The location and function of such facilities will not degrade the functions or values of the stream or
stream buffer.
9. City Discretion in Protection, Enhancement and Preservation of Streams. The city of Edmonds is unique
within the state of Washington as a built -out community with streams that have been incorporated within, and
often located immediately adjacent to, residential development. This title allows the director full discretion to
condition proposals for development on parcels containing, adjacent to, or potentially impacting streams to
enhance conditions consistent with ECDC 23.40.050 and the purposes and objectives of this title. Conditions
on development shall be required to enhance streams and stream buffers as fish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas to provide increased protection of anadromous fisheries and potential fish habitat in
accordance with best available science and the recommendations of an approved critical areas report and may
include:
a. Removal of stream bank armoring;
b. In -stream habitat modification;
c. Native planting;
d. Relocation of stream channel portions to create contiguous riparian corridors or wildlife habitat;
e. Planting of stream bank native vegetation to increase stream shading;
f. Removal and control of nonnative, invasive weed species;
g. Requiring additional building setbacks or modified buffers; and
h. Limiting or reducing the types or densities of particular uses.
The right of discretion in provisioning development in regard to streams is maintained in order to provide for
the creation of enhanced conditions over those currently existing around streams in the city of Edmonds. In all
instances where an applicant cannot demonstrate that standard stream buffer widths as provided in subsection
(D)(1) of this section can be accommodated by project development, the applicant shall be required to submit a
stream buffer enhancement plan or a stream mitigation and buffer enhancement plan as part of a critical areas
report indicating that post -project site conditions will provide equivalent or greater protection of stream
functions and fish habitat over a standard stream buffer and existing site conditions. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A),
2016; Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
Packet Pg. 348
7.4.a
Figure 23.90.000
CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS
Critical Areas Compliance Requirements`
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas
VW and 1>aJUR Amy iu'nl Arn Brymi -
Hdlm(om radon @ �` d M� NJ"llonel
Am IIWHLA, n�yY oA fiat
G6:vndono oar b' p el
- - tWhNrelAm n4lal�.Plm
MiEu 'I J ' Ilya rt.
II pu' �
FWHLA IIIS.S� rtu mAe
vuA W�
lny
mk,4 y n
MvWpnwi.
vrs Evdun
(WkAd>ry.
+iJUAb
RIII�IArtn P,cpon
ii :.i
hw h.inlie.Nnnlmr
u iNn iw
julNUtlonllrrnr
hrlM vnAin Wlnn of
u�Ai�nPonn.
d
i
aM wlwa loll oniM
dmnn116muAn Pioim
MeloCmm6
I �, i.i.
N� odJlc��nnl
NnNtlMonvl
mmyNm
rcv�rt I. rznn
.. Le�ryWOIIIPAb
l�rrww„nwr,
��d
dn.m�����r,��mm.�
nrol��wINi��n
nnrwl
Imcamnrtrt�lm
�,wub��, �
A,m lwmab.n..
nm���.,b l.��wraam..
i���wm,�r�d���.i�h
u�ulxLrSliuil'n wddv
�
Imrvrewl bmren�e r
WlfnwilM
r
nu�rmdxemmxrn
bnRro,eJumm,
w�NAc
t
1
A"x'b`*
1
Noa6tiboi.l
onid'n:.iil vovtlAiMwl Strtxm bulhlwofyinA
mmplH� -C- dlo -IhAilwnd F
av � ennhRnmhmn—,
wfi A'^`d'Sm
'° Fa.K
rml(Jlan�
Ipw�amm�
'Report requirements may be met through submission of a single rrikal area report or multiple reports in combination.
Section 24.30.010 Adoption criteria.
Shoreline designations have been determined after consideration o£
A. The ecological functions and processes that characterize the shoreline, together with the degree of human
alteration; and
B. Existing development patterns together with ECDC Title 16 zoning designations, the city comprehensive plan
designations and other officially adopted plans; and
C. The goals of the city of Edmonds citizen residents for their shorelines; and
D. Other state policies in the Act and the shoreline master program guidelines (RCW 90.58.020 and Chapter 173-26
WAC, respectively). [Ord. 4072 § 1 (Att. A), 2017].
Section 24.80.150 Administrative authority and responsibility.
A. Shoreline Administrator. The shoreline administrator shall be the planning manager or his/her designee and is
vested with the following authority and responsibility to:
1. Have overall administrative responsibility for this master program;
2. Determine if a public hearing should be held on a shoreline permit application by the hearing examiner
pursuant to ECDC 24.80.100;
3. Grant or deny written permit exemptions from shoreline substantial development permit requirements of this
master program;
4. Authorize, approve or deny shoreline substantial development permits, except for those for which a public
hearing is required pursuant to ECDC 24.80.100;
5. Make written recommendation to the hearing examiner or city council as appropriate and, insofar as possible,
in order to assure that all relevant information, testimony, and questions regarding a specific matter are made
available during their respective reviews of such matter;
Packet Pg. 349
7.4.a
6. Review and evaluate the records of project review actions (permits and exemptions) in shoreline areas and
report on the cumulative effects of authorized development of shoreline conditions at a minimum every eight
years when this master program is updated. The administrator shall coordinate such review with the
Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, and other
interested parties;
7. Advise interested citizen residents and project proponents of the goals, policies, regulations and procedures
of this master program; and
8. Make administrative decisions and interpretations of the policies and regulations of this master program and
the Shoreline Management Act.
B. Hearing Examiner. The hearing examiner is vested with the following authority:
1. To grant or deny shoreline substantial development permits requiring public hearings pursuant to ECDC
24.80.100;
2. To grant or deny shoreline conditional use permits under this master program;
3. To grant or deny variances from this master program; and
4. To decide on appeals of administrative decisions issued by the administrator of this master program in
accordance with procedures set forth in ECDC Title 20.
C. City Council.
1. The Edmonds city council is vested with the authority to approve any revisions or amendments to this master
program in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Shoreline Management Act and the Washington
Administrative Code.
2. To become effective, any amendment to this master program must be reviewed and adopted by the
Department of Ecology pursuant to RCW 90.58.190 and Chapter 173-26 WAC.
3. The city council will conduct the periodic review process consistent with the requirements of RCW
90.58.080 and WAC 173-26-090. [Ord. 4150 § 2 (Exh. 1), 2019; Ord. 4072 § 1 (Att. A), 2017].
Packet Pg. 350
7.4.a
Q
Packet Pg. 351
7.4.b
Minor Code Amendment Package 2
f
Code Reference Current Code Number oProposed Code Change Reason Notes/Content
Occurences
Snohomish County Health Department is the regulatory authority.
1
ECC 6.10
ECC 6.10 - Health Officer
i
Eliminate Code Section
Outdated Reference
County has been regulatory authority since 1980 under Ordinance 2176
7
ECC 6.20.042.A.1
"ECDC 18.45.020"
1
"ECDC 23.10.020"
Outdated Reference
ECDC Chapter 18.45 was repealed by Ordinance 4218 in 2021 and
replaced with Chapter 23.10
3
ECC 7.10.065.A
"environmentally sensitive"
1
"critical"
Inconsistency
Reference to critical areas as defined in ECDC 23.40.005
4
ECC 10.15
Chapter 10.15 Building board of appeals
1
Eliminate Code Section
Outdated Reference
Recodified to Chapter 19.80 ECDC by Ordinance 3740 in 2009)
Development fees were listed in ECDC 15.00 until 1996 under
"Such fees may be established from time to
are established by resolution of the
Outdated Reference/
Ordinance 3108. Solution is to provide hyperlink to'2023 Fees
5
ECDC 15.00.020
time by resolution of the city council"
1
city council"
Needs Clarification
Associated with Development' on COE website, adopted by Resolution
1515in 2023
6
ECDC 15.00.050.D
"three copies"
1
"the document"
Outdated Reference
Only one copy would be required per digitized standards.
ECDC 16.43.020.A; ECDC 16.45.010.13;
7
ECDC 16.50.010.8; ECDC 16.55.010(B);
8
"Outdoor dining meeting the criteria of
Inconsistency
Consistency with ECDC 17.75.010.A
ECDC 16.60.010(B); ECDC 16.62.010(B);
Chapter 17.75 ECDC"
ECDC 16.100.030; ECDC 16.110.010
-Code Reviser's note: See ECDC 19.00.070.13
-Code Reviser's note: See ECDC
ECDC 19.00.070.D no longer exists. All development fees can be found
8
ECDC Chapter 17.30
and Chapter 15.00 ECDC for fence permit
1
Outdated Reference
fees"
15.00.020 for fence permit fees"
through Chapter 15.00 ECDC
9
ECDC Chapter 17.35
ECDC Chapter 17.35
1
Eliminate Code Section
Redundant
Recodified in ECC 5.05 in 2009
"Elementary schools, junior high schools,
"Primary and Secondary Schools: See ECDC
10
ECDC 17.50.020.C.4
boarding schools ...."
1
17.100.050.M for parking standards
Inconsistency
Consistency with ECDC 17.100.050.M.
relating to primary and secondary schools
"Residential colleges and universities: six
Clarifies parking standards from ECDC 17.50.020.C.4 while staying
11
ECDC 17.50.020.C.5
1
spaces per classroom, or one space per
Needs Clarification
consistent with ECDC 17.100.050.M
daytime employee, whichever is greater"
"6. High schools (senior): one space per
12
ECDC 17.50.020.C.6
daytime employee"
1
Eliminate section
Inconsistency
Consistency with ECDC 17.100.050.M.
"A. Square Feet. Unless otherwise specified,
"A. Square Feet. Unless otherwise
square feet refers to the gross building square
specified, square feet refers to the gross
Not consistent with outdoor dining ECDC 17.75.010.E (No additional
13
17.50.030.A
footage, including outdoor areas used for the
1
building square footage, including outdoor
Inconsistency
parking stalls shall be required for outdoor dining usage.)
same use (such as an outdoor eating area for
areas used for the same use."
a restaurant)."
Council extended the Designated Street Front in BD in 2022.
14
17.50.070.B
"Edmonds"
1
"Daley"
Inconsistency
Consistency with 16.43 designated street front map to include all
parcels.
Packet Pg. 352
7.4.b
IN _—T
Add illustration with heading "Figure
Illustration is included EV
15
17.115.020
"',,-0',,,
1
17.115.-1: Electric Vehicle Charging
Needs Clarification
on website to clarify charging capacity
Capacities"
requirements.
ECDC 18.00.010.A; ECDC 18.05.040;
ECDC 18.10.010.A; ECDC 18.20.040.6;
ECDC 18.30.050.C; ECDC 18.60.040; ECDC
16
18.80.060.A; ECDC 20.15.A.290.A.1;
"Chapter 15.00 ECDC"
15
"ECDC 15.00.020"
Needs Clarification
Clarifiies location of Fee Schedule
ECDC 20.60.100; ECDC 20.75.040.D;
ECDC 20.75.050.E; ECDC 20.75.090.E;
ECDC 20.75.110.A; ECDC 20.75.013.A;
ECDC 20.75.145.A
"The director shall have the authority to
"The director shall have the authority to
develop, implement, and enforce policies and
develop, implement and enforce policies
17
ECDC 18.30.020.13
procedures to administer and enforce this
1
(such as the Edmonds Stormwater
Typo
Previous Ord 3792 does not contain these sections (See also ords 4263,
chapter per ECDC 18.30.110 and 18.30.120,
Addendum) and procedures to administer
4044)
such as the Edmonds stormwater addendum"
and enforce this chapter per ECDC
18.30.100."
"Written proposal: seven copies of a written
18
ECDC 18.70.030.B.5.e
proposal in eight and one-half by 11-inch
1
"Written proposal to include:"
Outdated Reference
Multiple copies are not required per digitization
format to include:"
"The continuance is intended to provide the
applicant with sufficient time to prepare the
material required for Phase 1 of the public
Replace underlined "Phase 1" with "Phase
19
ECDC 20.12.020.A.5
hearing, including any design or redesign
1
2„
Typo
Resolves typo.
needed to address the input of the public and
ADB during Phase 1 of the public hearing by
complying with the prioritized checklist."
ECDC 20.30.050.0 reads: "Discontinuance of
Eliminate Section ECDC 20.30.050.6; ECDC
In -lieu parking fees in ECDC 17.50.070 were eliminated when Chapter
Use. If applicant cannot or will not provide
20.30.050.0 will read: Eliminate Section:
17.50 was repealed and replaced in 2004 through Ordinance 3496.
parking, or the in -lieu parking fee, as set forth
"Discontinuance of Use. If applicant cannot
ECDC 17.50.070.D prior to 2004 reads "The in -lieu fee shall be set forth
20
ECDC 20.30.050.6; ECDC 20.30.050.0
in subsections A and B of this section, the
2
or will not provide parking, as set forth in
Outdated Reference
applicant will discontinue the use, or that
subsection A of this section, the applicant
in chapter 15.00." Parking in -lieu fees were codified in ECDC
portion of use causing the parking
will discontinue the use, or that portion of
15.00.030(B). ECDC 15.00.030 was eliminated in 1996 under Ordinance
deficiency..."
use causing the parking deficiency..."
3108
"C= Conditionally permitted through design
"C =Conditionally permitted if consistent
21
ECDC 20.60.020.M Note
review if consistent with the standards
1
with the standards itemized in subsection
Outdated Reference
Sign permits do not require ADB approval
itemized in subsection (N) of this section"
(N) of this section"
"A reproducible copy of the preliminary plat
22
ECDC 20.75.040
and the number of prints required by the
1
"The preliminary plat"
Outdated Reference
Digital applications do not require multiple or reproducible paper copies
planning and development department"
There is no specific form. Lot line adjustment and subdivision applicants
23
ECDC 20.75.040; ECDC 20.75.050.D
"forms"
2
Eliminate references to forms
Outdated Reference
are required to submit the required material listed in 20.75.040 and
20.75.050.D through the MyBuildingPermit portal.
"Gross lot area for the original parcels and the
"Gross and net lot area for the original
Clarification. Applicants are required to provide lot area including
24
ECDC 20.75.050.D.1.d
proposed parcels (gross lot area does not
1
parcels and the proposed parcels (net lot
Needs Clarification
vehicular access easements (gross) as well as the area with access
include any lot area devoted to vehicular
area does not include any lot area devoted
easements deducted (net).
ingress/egress easements)"
to vehicular ingress/egress easements)"
25
ECDC 20.75.065.13
ECDC 20.75.065.13
1
Eliminate Code Section
Redundant
Redundant with ECDC 20.03
d
O
U
L
O
C
4-
0
f3
O
Q
Q
a
N
M
N
O
N
f3
Y
V
fC
d
r-+
C
0)
E
C
0)
Q
O
U
L
O
r_
2
a�
a
Packet Pg. 353
7.4.b
26
ECDC 20.75.085
"city health officer"
1
"Snohomish County health officer"
Outdated Reference
Snohomish County is the regulatory authority
27
ECDC 20.75.140.G
"city of Edmonds health officer"
1
"Snohomish County health officer"
Outdated Reference
Snohomish County is the regulatory authority
28
ECDC 23.40.240.E
"18.45.070.6 and 18.45.070.C," "18.45.070
2
"23.10.100.C," and "23.10.100.C"
Outdated Reference
ECDC Chapter 18.45 was repealed by Ordinance 4218 in 2021 and
and 18.45.075"
replaced with Chapter 23.10
Eliminate outdated exclusionary language unless specification of
citizenship is required or name of an established Commission. 'Citizen'
29
Throughout
"citizen"
57
"resident"
Outdated Reference
occurs 76 times in total, but only 18 instances should remain as such.
United States Census Bureau 2020 American Community Survey
identifies 7%of the population of Edmonds as non -US citizens.
Refer to 2.10.050. Community Development Department was
established in 1980 under Ordinance 2136 and renamed in 1999 as
30
Throughout
"Community Development director"
17
"Planning and Development director"
Outdated Reference
Development Services Department under Ordinance 3279.
Development Services was renamed to Planning and Development
under Ordinance 4299 in 2023.
Refer to 2.10.050. Community Service Department was created under
Ordinance 2442 in 1984, and the Community Service Director was the
administrative head of Community Services Department which included
31
Throughout
"Community Services director"
46
"Public Works director" or "Planning and
Outdated Reference
the engineering division, public works, planning, and parks a
Development Director"
recreations. It was repealed in 1999 under Ordinance 3279. Ordinance
3959 from 2014 further clarified divisions. At no point in time, as
codified, does the position refer to the current position of "Community
Services Director, currently held by Todd Tatum
32
Throughout
"Finance director"
38
"Administrative Services director"
Outdated Reference
Refer to 2.10.050. Administrative Services Department created in 1984
under Ordinance 2443 and renamed "Finance Department."
Consistency within ECDC and with Washington State Department of
33
Throughout
"Storm water"
46
"stormwater"
Inconsistency
Ecology and United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Stormwater is a distinct type of water that is used as a single noun.
d
O
U
L
O
C
4-
0
f3
O
L
Q
Q
a
N
r
M
N
O
N
f3
Y
V
M
d
r-+
C
O
E
C
O
E
Q
O
U
L
O
r_
C
a
Packet Pg. 354
7.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Approval of Supplemental Agreement with Transpo for SR-104 Adaptive System from 236th St. SW to
226th St. SW Project
Staff Lead: Bertrand Hauss
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Rob English
Background/History
On July 11, 2023, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was
forwarded to the consent agenda for approval.
On June 28, 2022, the City Council approved the Local Agency Consultant Agreement with Transpo
Group for the SR-104 Adaptive System project.
Staff Recommendation
Approve Supplemental Agreement.
Narrative
The SR-104 Corridor from 2361h St. SW to 2261h St. SW consists of a 1.25 mile corridor with five (5)
signalized intersections spaced approximately one quarter (.25) mile away from each other with Average
Daily Traffic (ADT) of approximately 25,000 vehicles per day. This section of SR-104 does not have an
existing traffic signal communication/coordination system This project will provide an adaptive system
along SR-104 to improve traffic flows and reduce vehicle emissions.
The supplement consists of the following additions;
Topographic survey along 212th St. SW, 72nd Ave., 236th St. SW, and within Public Works
Building property for the proposed connection to the new Traffic Management Center since
the design team has changed their communication approach from wireless to fiber optic
cable. (Additional $30,127.99)
Addition of fiber optic cable to the plans as part of 30%, 60%, 90%, and 100% PS&E. (Additional
$9,759.20)
As part of this supplement, the following task has been removed from the original agreement:
Geotechnical investigation, to be completed by HWA, since wireless communication has been
removed. (Reduction of $22,377.42)
The initial agreement approved in June 2022 had a total authorization amount of $316,545, plus a
$15,827.25 management reserve for a maximum amount payable of $332,372.25.
With the proposed contract changes, the additional cost is $17,509.77. The original management
reserve of $15,827.25 from the initial agreement will be used to off -set this cost increase. The revised
Packet Pg. 355
7.5
total for the amount authorized is $334,054.77. Staff recommends the management reserve be
replenished with $16,702.74 (5% of $334,054.77) since the design is only 30% complete. The new
maximum amount payable for this agreement is $350,757.51.
The City secured $287,000 of federal CMAQ grant for the design phase with $123,000 in local match.
During the design phase, grant applications will be submitted to secure construction funds.
Attachments:
Attachment 1- Supplemental Agreement
Packet Pg. 356
7.5.a
Washington State
To Department of Transportation
Supplemental Agreement
Number
Organization and Address
Phone:
Original Agreement Number
Project Number
Execution Date
Completion Date
Project Title
New Maximum Amount Payable
Description of Work
The Local Agency of
desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with
and executed on
and identified as Agreement No
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
11
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days
for completion of the work to read:
III
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate
spaces below and return to this office for final action.
QI
Consultant Signature
M
Approving Authority Signature
DOT Form 140-063
Revised 09/2005
Packet Pg. 357
7.5.a
Exhibit A-1: Amendment to Agreement for Services
Client Name: City of Edmonds
Project Name: SR-104 Adaptive System from 236th St. SW to 226th St. SW
Original Agreement Dated: June 23, 2022 TG: 1.22138.00
The existing Agreement for Services between Transpo Group ("Transpo") and its team of subconsultants
("Consultant") and the City of Edmonds ("City") is amended to include the following additional services. All
terms and conditions described in the Agreement remain in force and are not modified by this Amendment.
Scope of Services
In addition to the services described in Exhibit A of the Agreement, the Consultant will provide the following
services:
Task 04—ITS PS&E
Subtask 4.1: Data Collection
Subtask 4.1.1: Topographic Survey
The Consultant will collect additional topographic survey data to include the extended project area limits to
provide conduit and fiber optic connections between SR 104 and the City of Edmonds Public Works
Building. Subtask 4.1.1: Topographic Survey is supplemented with the following:
Subtask 4.1.1.1: Additional Topographic Survey
The Consultant is responsible for providing survey base mapping services to support the design
elements for two project locations. The first location encompasses portions of 72nd Ave W, 212th
St SW, Highway 99, and the City of Edmonds Public Works Building, while the second location
includes portions of 236th St SW and Highway 99. Exhibits 4.1.1.1-A and 4.1.1.1-B display both
project areas respectively.
The following activities are associated with this task:
• Establish horizontal and vertical control based on published monuments near the site. The
Horizontal Datum and Vertical Datum will be NAD 83/2011, Washington State Plane, North
Zone and NAVD88, respectively, or as otherwise required. Set and measure horizontal and
vertical control necessary for the mapping and right-of-way determination. Control points
will be set for future phases of construction for this project.
• Coordinate underground utility locates performed by an underground utility subconsultant.
• Complete design level topographic mapping and survey above ground surface features
between the face of curb and right-of-way margin, within the project limits. Surveying within
the active roadways are excluded.
• Topography will be surveyed using methods that will produce a 2-foot contour interval base
map.
The mapping will include, but will not limited to, the following above ground features:
• Curb and gutter including existing curb cuts, curb ramps and driveways
• Sidewalks and paths
• Pavement edges
• Driveways and ramps
• Luminaires
• Water meters, valves, hydrants, and irrigation control valves
• Electrical transformers, vaults, poles, and hand -holes
• Telecommunication risers, vaults, poles, junction boxes, and hand -holes
r
Packet Pg. 358
7.5.a
• Gas valves and meters
• Storm drain manhole lids
• Catch basin rims
• Sanitary sewer manhole lids
• Culverts
• Overhead lines
• Traffic poles and arms
• Grade breaks, localized depressions, ditches, ridges, and other surface grades
• Street signs
• Trees over 4-inch diameter breast height (DBH) with size, type and dripline noted
• Sub -surface utility paint marks delineated by a professional utility location service from the
face of curb to the right-of-way edge and not within the active road, except for those
portions within the active roadway explicitly called out below in Exhibit 4.1.1.1-A and
Exhibit 4.1.1.1-B.
• Survey and calculate all right-of-way limits for 236th St SW, Highway 99, 212th St SW, and
72nd Ave W, for the project areas depicted in Exhibit 4.1.1.1-A and Exhibit 4.1.1.1-B.
• Compile mapping and right-of-way information into a 1 "=20' scale base map in AutoCAD,
Civil 3D Version 2020.
Assumptions
• Topographic survey and design will be provided in AutoCAD 2020 and Civil 3D.
• Base map will be developed using the Consultant's colors, text size/style, and layering
conventions.
• GIS parcel line information will be sufficient for the purposes of delineating lateral private
ownership boundaries adjacent to 236th St SW, Highway 99, 212th St SW, and 72nd Ave
W, for the project areas depicted in Exhibit 4.1.1.1-A and Exhibit 4.1.1.1-B.
• It is assumed that Right of Entry documents are not needed to perform this task.
• The Consultant will hire a private underground utility locate firm to locate existing utilities.
Locates will target known underground utilities, including water, storm sewer, sanitary
sewer, communications, gas, and power. It may not be possible to locate non -conductible
utilities. Underground utilities will only be located between the curb lines and the limits of
the right-of-way, and not within the active road, except for those portions within the active
roadway explicitly called out below in Exhibit 4.1.1.1-A and Exhibit 4.1.1.1-B.
• Utility inverts within the active roadway will not be provided.
• Surface features and details within the active roadway is not part of this scope.
• This scope of work does not include real estate support services for the proposed
improvements, which may include property reconfigurations, street vacations/dedications,
temporary construction easements or real property purchase.
• Property lines and corners will not be monumented as part of this scope of work.
Consultant Deliverables
• 1" = 20' scale base map in AutoCAD, Version 2020 in electronic format for the survey area
including both Existing Condition sheets and Control Plan.
r
Packet Pg. 359
7.5.a
Exhibit 4.1.1.1-A
0
a
c
R
.� �, a • fix
ir
�4 r
�'I +� �' �'� fir• � - � �
t r4md adtl l an a l surtty al Ednands MGIk: Walks. µ .F .-y -.w • — Q:
CCIEW OONq r•Cm 54t NNntl In91609 AI xrp14 - F• 7 sL - L
I'�Y appm Vl m o 6!d Wat-I6. %Iko IICrd
^~
a utlll—th h ham . I : I T r e 1• Q
rmu
0-0 T
S N@6C8O31niN5—gya4tlY' 6r1?r!%"d /ram f Q
- - Aw W. ramrMi SI SW 7o dx -1hbn "dgr al Nsd Yleed sn'rdlryr tiMd uHAss +y 4_- f 3
— FdT}nd.•, F-1]I: 'IfC+lt, i�I;.Vrn; C-]1— Sir-, arou n Ina mlamamm 1 Y:. I IA
o f�
- _ l ins ihnx - - �> -�.�. �� d
_ f I vt:. 0
'i'� - aanml„ y L
t,] atltlB arJ eJS�QIf alone Ne rwltl Yire
p _ a ,,...
,: Il lllh SI Sw, imn• 1 11l 1'7 la Sahloa Lanlar
- :ri�99 cnlad fluM161 lmm& al 2.�qLl - { I # f
_ �r xe of sulbb adNlne. _.'�y •k �W i
H n a n M ril su Ina alone l'lahrrav 99. IranMnlb . ffi�
ow.lrn »a nonr Ing of Inn n�lr sl sw rrxsxllon, In � e :''•��.r�+�r�,
arcxl aay6191S311 saendne 50ut&n adpe cl IN F • yam. ` -
Ji d.
cr rnlb In R.M Inw. % � i Iw {i fT wlit
Hale IhaL •n tall also need la mluda the ex M--q i6er
. - [amp wlllk Ia:a�op:r rrr Inn am ukz tt+a da xn •;.:;,�� � -■ _�■ 3
'r• _ — Iicl lO crdNBp BofrB bf dle eaILada C+rl rl-:: ,ft -- ♦ v� � r 5 F • P N
- Fr r 4 a 1
4
.#�
6nIC..d;.-. a.e. Jellyi V$ggaal�IdmpS 7Uaa rxcd and -•around ul nas Gllweer r }
�i-mvrs. -'dae al aativmrnl. untlalgaund and ax adktlno IM, op—r xrlls
WmrFpatl fnln as, fro' .3nn,,I—rallon {+d Oh nCM a'dsm4,) Bnd the Row
eq,rpveee udI ry peiBs �rw�4o.ee..e119. 9radB r Irn on dne west afar al li hwa 99 ►+
L'. aka a ns-trans R4711
Q
Tr
I Packet Pg. 360
7.5.a
neleveloldetail towhatwasecapetlpreviously .•
SR 104 (e.g., curb, gutler,.6-alb. ramps, — -- -
sways, edgy or paveacM. underground and
�rhead ulili likllluminalion
ripmerrt, ulilily Traffic signary poles, malhoses-walls. grade
aks, smuns. trees, ROW Imes, etc. .
Tr
_ �+ '� +fir �' •- �
A
Need add twnal survey along H'gl- r y 99, from the curb return on rla
north leg of the 236th St SW inter —on to the curb retum on 1
north e O of the. rb t Tree a line- x Caller[ surrey hom edge
of pavemenVlace of cu rb to ROW Ilne f
Nole that we wll I also need to include the—nrly-constructed raised € i
•. mecan am fie existing liter optic cable vaulls located in them. We !
jyIx tlo not need to ccllec! suvey fa• the east sdtl of Highway 98.
fir,
Dollar Tree a <
Also reed underground —al
the h the ntersect'o yl
i
J , the
need under opbw c bie between r rlinr h .t r r:xt
the eMlsurg f ter optc cable vaul� � 4h a "*
(+Wlt rwnh a d south) and the ROW -
Ilne on the west sltle o1 R w 99 rr, , 4
77
7Ar .r
4
Packet Pg. 361
7.5.a
Subtask 4.1.2: Geotechnica/ Investigation
Amended Scope of Services:
When this project was originally scoped, geotechnical investigations were included in the event that poles,
associated with the installation of a new wireless communications system, were needed. As the project has
progressed, it has been determined that a new fiber optic communications system will be installed, and that
wireless communications will not be needed. As such, Subtask 4.1.2 is deleted from the Scope of Services.
Subtask 4.2: 30% Design
In addition to the locations identified under Task 04 — ITS PS&E, the Consultant will also include the design
elements and areas necessary to show the communications connection between the SR 104 ASC
intersections and the City of Edmonds Public Works Building. It is anticipated that this will take place via
new conduits and fiber optic cable installed along 236th St SW, to connect to an existing cable vault
located within the Highway 99 median located just south of 236th St SW. New fiber optic cable will then be
installed via existing spare conduits located within the Highway 99 median, from just south of 236th St SW
to just south of 212th St SW. From there, it is anticipated that new conduits and fiber optic cable will be
installed along 212th St SW and along 72nd Ave W to connect to an existing cable vault located within the
parking lot of the City of Edmonds Public Works Building. New fiber optic cable will then be installed via
existing conduits to be terminated within the existing Mechanical Room (note: currently, the City's fiber
optic communications rack is located in a separate building, but the IT Department has noted that this will
be moved to the Mechanical Room; it is assumed that this relocation will be completed by the time this
project is constructed).
Subtask 4.3: 60% Design
The Consultant will include the additional design elements described under Subtask 4.2 into the 60%
Design package.
Subtask 4A 90% Design
The Consultant will include the additional design elements described under Subtask 4.2 into the 90%
Design package.
Packet Pg. 362
7.5.a
Transpo Group USA, Inc.
Cost Estimate Worksheet
Cfal'1spogroup Tr
Number / Project Name
1.22138.00 - City of Edmonds - SR-10
Adaptive System from 236th St. SW to
226th St. SW - Supplement 1
Rate schedule is effective from July 1, 2023 through June 28, 2024
Only key staff are shown and other staff may work on and charge to the project as needed by the project manager.
Labor.,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
initials
labor category
cost rote
Project
PIC/Fed.
Sys. Eng.
Project
Data
CAD/
Transp.
CAD/
Project
Manager
Funding
Lead
Engineer
Analyst
Graphics
Analyst
Graphics
Admin
Lead
JKHC
VM
BA2
Eng L5
Prin L7
Pnn L7
En L4
En L5
En L3
An L2
PA L4
PA L5
$71.15
$96.15
$117.79
$57.69
$71.15
$52.88
$45.19
$50.00
$62.50
Work Task
Task 1 -Project Management
Hours
Cost
$0
1.1 - Project Coordination
0
$0
1.2 - Progress Reports and Invoices
0
$0
1.3 - Meetings
0
$0
Bi-weekly Meetings
$0
City Council Meeting and Prep.
0
$0
Public Outreach Meeting/Open House and Prep.71
0
$0
1.4 - Project Schedule
0
$0
Task 2 - ASC Systems Engineering
0
$0
2.1 - Concept of Operations
0
$0
Workshop
0
$0
Draft ConOps
0
$0
Final ConOps
0
$0
2.2 - System Requirements
0
$0
Workshops
0
$0
Draft SysRegs
0
$0
Final SysRegs
0
$0
RFI Documents
0
$0
Vendor Presentations
0
$0
2.3 - Verification and Validation Plans
0
$0
Draft Verification Plan
0
$0
Final Verification Plan
0
$0
Draft Validation Plan
0
$0
Final Validation Plan
0
$0
2.4-Procurement Plan
0
$0
Draft Procurement Plan
0
$0
Final Procurement Plan
0
$0
RFP Documentation
0
$0
2.5 - Bidding Support Services
0
$0
Bidder Questions
0
$0
Addenda
0
$0
Proposal Evaluations
0
$0
2.6 - Implementation Technical Support
0
$0
Kick -Off Meeting
0
$0
Bi-weekly Meetings
0
$0
RFIs
0
$0
site visits
0
$0
Verification Plan Review
0
$0
2.7-Validation Report
0
$0
Daft Validation Report
0
$0
Final Validation Report
0
$0
Task 3 - Technology and Altematives Evaluation
0
$0
Vehicle Detection Systems Evaluation
0
$0
Communications System Evaluation
0
$0
TMC Evaluation
0
$0
Dmft Memomndum
0
$0
Final Memorandum
0
$0
Task 4 - ITS PS&E
0
$0
4.1 - Data Collection
0
$0
4.1.1- Topographic Survey
0
$0
4.1.2- Geotechnical Investigation
0
$0
4.1.3-ASBuilt Review and Field Investigation
0
$0
4.2 - 30 % Design
0
$0
Design Plans
0
$0
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
0
$0
Supporting Calculations
0
$0
Qc
0
$0
Design Review
0
$0
4.3 - 60 % Design
0
$0
Design Plans
2
4
6
12
$690
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
0
$0
Supporting Calculations
0
$0
Qc
0
$0
Design Review
0
$0
Cost Estimate Prepared on: 7/18/2023
Packet Pg. 363
7.5.a
Transpo Group USA, Inc.
Cost Estimate Worksheet
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
MIS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
4.4-90% Design
0
ASC System Vendor Coordination
0
Design Plans
2
4
6
12
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
0
Project Manual
0
Supporting calculations
0
QC
0
Design Review
0
4.5-95% Design
0
Design Plans
0
Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
0
Project Manual
0
Supporting calculations
0
QC
0
4.6 - Final PS&E
0
Design Plans
0
Project Manual
0
Engineers Estimate
0
Task 5 - Utility Coordination
0
Meetings
0
Supporting Documentation
0
Task 6 - Bid and Award Support
0
Pre -Bid Meeting
0
Bidder Questions
0
Addenda
0
0
:ellaneous
$0
$0
$690
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Hours 4 0 0 1 8 1 0 1 12 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 24
$285 $0 $0 $462 $0 $635 $0 $0 $0 :t•:
Subconsu
$4,166.202
tants: Subs
Firm Cost
�Dc $MU 9
HWA GeoScience-$22,377.42
PH Consulting $5,593.00
SUPPLEMENT 1 ESTIMATE $17,509.77
SUPPLEMENT 1 MANAGEMENT RESERVE $18,385.26
SUPPLEMENT 1 GRAND TOTAL ESTIMAT $35,895.03
Ipplement 1 will utilize $17,509.77 from the Management Reserve Fund that was included as part of the original
reement, leaving a deficit of ($1,682.52). Supplement 1 will also replenish the Management Reserve Fund to 5
the Revised Contract Total Estimate (5 % of $334,054.77 = $16,702.74), which requires the addition of
8.385.26. See below for additional details.
additional Management Reserve Fund is needed to accommodate for any overruns of direct salary and
head costs that might occur under the existing scope of work, or for the consultant to perform additional work
is outside the agreement or supplement's scope of work (but within the scope of the advertised project). This
include the need for additional check -in meetings, additional support during implementation of the ASC
am, additional data sources that may be desired for the Validation Report, etc.
ORIGINAL
SUPPLEMENT
ORIGINAL TOTAL ESTIMATE $316,545.00
ORIGINAL MANAGEMENT RESERVE $15,827.25
ORIGINAL GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATE $332,372.25
SUPPLEMENT 1 TOTAL ESTIMATE $17,509.77
SUPPLEMENT 1 MANAGEMENT RESERVE $18,385.26
SUPPLEMENT 1 GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATE $35,895.03
CONTRACT
REVISED CONTRACT TOTAL ESTIMATE $334,054.77
REVISED CONTRACT MANAGEMENT RESERVE (5%) $16,702.74
Cost Estimate Prepared on: 7/18/2023
Packet Pg. 364
7.5.a
Aft
Washington State
Department of Transportation
June 15, 2023
Transpo Group USA, Inc.
12131 113th Avenue NE, Suite 203
Kirkland, WA 98034
Development Division
Contract Services Office
PO Box 47408
Olympia, WA 98504-7408
7345 Linderson Way SW
Tumwater, WA 98501-6504
TTY:1-800-833-6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
Subject: Acceptance FYE 2022 ICR — Risk Assessment Review
Dear Sarah Brinkerhoff:
Based on Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Risk
Assessment review of your Indirect Cost Rate (ICR), we have accepted your proposed
FYE 2022 ICR of 176.75% of direct labor (rate includes 0.11 % Facilities Capital Cost
of Money). This rate will be applicable for WSDOT Agreements and Local Agency
Contracts in Washington only. This rate may be subject to additional review if
considered necessary by WSDOT. Your ICR must be updated on an annual basis.
Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract.
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with your firm is
responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 704-6397 or via email
consultantrates(&wsdot.wa.2ov.
Regards;
schatzv,e 1farve
Schatzie Harvey (Jun 15, 2023 1 :45 PDT)
SCHATZIE HARVEY, CPA
Contract Services Manager
SH:BJO
Packet Pg. 365
7.5.a
L D C 1 Surveying
Engineering
Planning
Client Name: Transpo Group
Project Name: Edmonds Adaptive
Date: 7-18-23
Proposed Budget / Fee
Vince Townsend
Michael Nigel
young
James
Anderson
n/a
Sebastian
Garcia
Simon Teeter
Lee Anderson
n/a
Vasiliy Kotok
Lloyd Langevin
Miguel Rendon
Robert Waller
Clifford Miller
n/a
Jesse Sotelo
n/a
n/a
Task
Task Code
Director of Land
Surveying
Professional
Land Surveyor
Senior Survey
Technician
Survey Field
Manager
Survey
Technician
Senior Crew
Chief
Survey Crew
Chief II
Survey Crew
Chief II
Survey Crew
Chief II
Survey Crew
Chief I
Survey Crew
Chief I
Survey Rodman
I
Direct Labor
Costs
Over Head
Fee (30%)
Total
Direct Rate (per hour)
$67.68
$55.68
$40.00
$54.56
$40.96
$46.20
$43.08
$42.44
$40.00
$32.52
$32.00
$27.52
$0.00
$0.00
1.1 Additional Topographic Field Survey and Mapping
8
24
32
4
4
32
40
64
$8,502.72
$12,779.59
$2,125.68
23
407.99
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
$0.00
8
24
32
0
4
4
32
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
64
0
541.44
1 336.32
1 280.00
0.00
218.24
163.84
1 478.40
0.00
1 723.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1 761.28
0000
1.00
$8,502.72
$12,779.59
$2,125.68
$23,407.99
LDC Consulting Cost:
Subtotal: LDC Direct Labor Costs $ 8,502.72
Overhead 150.30% $ 12,779.59
Fee 25.001/o $ 2,125.68
Total: LDC Direct Labor, OH & Fee $ 23,407.99
Subconsultant(s):
1 Underground Utility Vendor $ 6,400.00
2 $
3 $
4 $
Subtotal $ 6,400.00
Overhead (5%) $ 320.00
Total: Subconsultants $ 6,720.00
Misc Reimbursable Expenses:
Title Reports $ -
Mileage & Expenses (Mileage @ Current IRS Rate) $0.625 $ 200.00
Printing $2 $ -
Total: Misc Reimbursables $
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST S 30,127.99
Packet Pg. 366
7.5.a
Aft
Washington State
Department of Transportation
April 21, 2023
Land Development Consultants
20210 142nd Ave. NE
Woodinville, WA 98072
Development Division
Contract Services Office
PO Box 47408
Olympia, WA 98504-7408
7345 Linderson Way SW
Tumwater, WA 98501-6504
TTY:1-800-833-6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
Subject: Acceptance FYE 2022 ICR — Risk Assessment Review
Dear Kyle Carlson:
Based on Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Risk
Assessment review of your Indirect Cost Rate (ICR), we have accepted your proposed
FYE 2022 ICR of 150.30%. This rate will be applicable for WSDOT Agreements and
Local Agency Contracts in Washington only. This rate may be subject to additional
review if considered necessary by WSDOT. Your ICR must be updated on an annual
basis.
Costs billed to agreements/contracts will still be subject to audit of actual costs, based
on the terms and conditions of the respective agreement/contract.
This was not a cognizant review. Any other entity contracting with your firm is
responsible for determining the acceptability of the ICR.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact our office at (360) 705-7019 or via email
consultantrates(&wsdot.wa.gov.
Regards;
sch&&I'e tfa�ve
Schatzie Harvey (Apr 21, 2023 1.48 PDT) Apr 21, 2023
SCHATZIE HARVEY, CPA
Contract Services Manager
SH:BJO
Packet Pg. 367
City of Edmonds
Supplement #1
Edmonds Way Adaptive Project
Fee Estimate Summary
Project No. 22
PH Consulting Staff Category
Hours
Rate
Cost
Principal
4
$
95.00
$
380.00
Senior Project Manager
0
$
90.00
$
-
Senior Traffic Engineer
12
$
75.00
$
900.00
Project Engineer
0
$
60.00
$
-
CAD Designer II
22
$
50.00
$
1,100.00
Office Administrator
0
$
40.00
$
-
Total Hours
38
$
2,380.00
Direct Labor Cost
Overhead Rate @ 110% of Direct Labor
Fee @25% of Direct Labor
Cost
Direct Expenses
Traffic Data/Counts
Reproduction Costs
Full Sized Copies (Bond)
Reprographics
Travel (Airfare, Hotel)
Other Expenses (Blueline)
2022 Mileage Rates
Sub -Total Direct Expenses
Subconsultants
Sub -Total Subconsultants
Sub -Total Project Fee Estimate
Management Reserve (-5%)
Total Fee
7/18/2023
Unit Cost Total
0 $ - $ -
0
0 $ - $ -
0 $ - $ -
0 $ - $ -
0 $ - $ -
0 $0.56/Mi $ -
0
4PH CONSULTING
Balanced Transportation Solutions
$ 2,380.00
$ 2,618.00
$ 595.00
$ 5,593.00
$ 5,593.00
$ 5,593.00
Packet Pg. 368
City of Edmonds Edmonds Way Adaptive Project Project No. 22
Supplement #1 Task Hour Breakdown
Task No.
Task Description
Principal
Senior Project
Manager
Senior Traffic
Engineer
Project
Engineer
CAD Designer
II
Office
Administrator
Total
Direct Rate
$ 95.00
$ 90.00
$ 75.00
$ 60.00
$ 50.00
$ 40.00
OH
Fixed Fee
Hourly Rate
$ 104.50
$ 26.13
$ 223.25
$ 99.00
$ 24.75
$ 211.50
$ 82.50
$ 20.63
$ 176.25
$ 66.00
$ 16.50
$ 141.00
$ 55.00
$ 13.75
$ 117.50
$ 44.00
$ 11.00
$ 94.00
3.0
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS
60 % Submittal (2 Additional Sheets)
2
6
12
20
90 % Submittal (2 Additional Sheets)
1
4
6
11
95 % Submittal (2 Additional Sheets)
1
2
2
5
Bid Set Submittal
0
0
2
2
PH TOTAL HOURSI
4
0
12
0
22
0
38
TOTAL ALL TASKS
$ 893.00
$
$ 2,115.00
$
$ 2,585.00
$
$ 5,593.00
7/18/2023
4PH CONSULTING
Balanced Transportation Solutions
Packet Pg. 369
7.5.a
PH Consulting LLC
Summary of Direct Labor Costs
Effective January 1, 2023-December 31, 2023
Maximum
Safe Harbor
Fixed Fee
Maximum Billing
Job Classifications
Direct Labor
Overhead
25%
Rate
Rate
110%
Principal
$
100.00
$
110.00
$
25.00
$
235.00
Sr Project Manager
$
95.00
$
104.50
$
23.75
$
223.25
Project Manager
$
90.00
$
99.00
$
22.50
$
211.50
Quality Manager
$
95.00
$
104.50
$
23.75
$
223.25
Senior Traffic Engineer
$
85.00
$
93.50
$
21.25
$
199.75
Project Engineer
$
75.00
$
82.50
$
18.75
$
176.25
Associate Engineer
$
55.00
$
60.50
$
13.75
$
129.25
Assistant Transportation Engineer $
50.00
$
55.00
$
12.50
$
117.50
Engineering Intern
$
40.00
$
44.00
$
10.00
$
94.00
CAD Designer III
$
60.00
$
66.00
$
15.00
$
141.00
CAD Designer II
$
50.00
$
55.00
$
12.50
$
117.50
CAD Designer 1
$
45.00
$
49.50
$
11.25
$
105.75
Office Administrator
$
45.00
$
49.50
$
11.25
$
105.75
Office Assistant
$
40.00
$
44.00
$
10.00
$
94.00
Direct non -salary costs will be billed at actual costs.
Direct Mileage will be billed at current approved IRS mileage rate.
4PH CONSULTING
Balanced Transportation Solutions
Packet Pg. 370
7.5.a
Washington State
Department of Transportation
June 26, 2023
Pablo Para, Owner
PH Consulting, LLC
913 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, Sute A
Tacoma, WA 98405-4149
Re: PH Consulting, LLC
Safe Harbor Indirect Cost Rate Extension
Dear Pablo:
Transportation Building
310 Maple Park Avenue S.E.
P.O. Box 47300
Olympia, WA 98504-7300
360-705-7000
TTY.1-800-833-6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
Washington State has received approval from our local Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Division to continue administering the "safe harbor" indirect cost rate program on engineering and
design related service contracts, as well as for Local Public Agency projects.
We completed our risk assessment for PH Consulting, LLC in January 2017. Our assessment was
conducted based on the documentation provided by the firm. The reviewed data included, but was not
limited to, a description of the company, basis of accounting, accounting system and the basis of indirect
costs. Based on our review, we found the firm eligible to use the Safe Harbor rate. PH Consulting opted
to use the Safe Harbor rate, rather than provide a FAR -compliant rate.
Based on further review and discussion with the firm, we are issuing an extension of the Safe Harbor
Indirect Cost Rate of 110% of direct labor with a field rate, where applicable, of 80% of direct labor for
PH Consulting.
PH Consulting agreed to improve Internal Controls and timekeeping processes to be able to develop an
Indirect Cost Rate Schedule in the future in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR),
Subpart 31. The WSDOT Internal Audit Office has provided guidance and information related to FARs
and the AASHTO Audit Guide. You may use the Safe Harbor Rate of 110%, or 80% for field office
situations, for agreements entered prior to June 30, 2024. For agreements entered after this date, please
contact the WSDOT Consultant Services Office (CSO) or our office for guidance.
The Safe Harbor Rate will not be subject to audit. Please coordinate with CSO or your Local Programs
contact if you have questions about when to apply the Safe Harbor rate to your agreement.
If you have any questions, please contact Steve McKerney or me at (360)705-7003.
Sincerely,
Jarron Elter
Agreement Compliance Audit Manager
cc: Steve McKemey, Director of Internal Audit
Larry Schofield, MS 47323
File
Packet Pg. 371
7.6
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Resolution Regarding 2024 Budget Priorities
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
During the April 28, 2023 budget retreat, Council discussed and prioritized several areas of emphasis and
improvement for our city in the next three to seven years.
On May 23, 2023 Council adopted a 2024 Budget Planning Calendar that included several June outreach
efforts to solicit public input on 2024 Budget priorities, and the intention to express these to the
administration by resolution.
On June 27, 2023 Council reviewed the collection of input at a special meeting focused on Council
Budget priorities. An exercise asked councilmembers to formulate these inputs and areas of emphasis
and improvement in the form of an inquiry - to inquire how this objective might best be achieved by
administration and city staff.
Following the Budget Priority meeting, these inquiries were consolidated and refined by council staff to
31 inquiries. Councilmembers selected their top 15 from the list, and council staff tallied and
aggregated these results. (attached)
Recommendation
Review the draft resolution of Council's 2024 Budget priorities and consider forwarding for approval on
the next consent agenda.
Narrative
The resolution reflects the Council's collective input and prioritization for the 2024 Budget; section 1
lists the general priorities that could be implemented in multiple ways by administration and staff, and
section 2 which are the specific top 15 inquiries about objectives that councilmembers would like to
have considered in department budget requests.
Attachments:
Tally and Aggregated How Can We Exercise 7.13.23
redline Draft Resolution of Council 2024 Budget Resolution 7.20.2023
Packet Pg. 372
7.6.a
Tallied and aggregated 7/13/23
Distributed and Councilmember replies sent directly to Beckie 7/11/23
Refined/ Consolidated 7/10/23
How Can We? Exercise from the 6/27/2023 Council Work Meeting on 2024 Budget Priorities
1. How can we reduce/prevent property crime/ improve public safety in our city? 7
2. How can we add a police substation to Highway 99? 4
3. How can we significantly improve response to medical/fire emergencies at the waterfront? 1
4. What can we do to reduce speeding in so many of our neighborhoods? 7
5. How can we increase beautification in all business districts in Edmonds? 4
6. How do we deal with graffiti, trash and abandoned shopping cards around town? 3
7. How do we improve walkability in all neighborhoods? 4
8. What are non -sidewalk safety methods to protect pedestrians and non -motorized traffic? 5
9. How can we accelerate street and sidewalk installation and maintenance? 6
10. What city buildings need repair or replacement in the near future and how can we prioritize a
list to fix them? 3
11. How can we prioritize ADA compliance throughout the city? 5
12. How can we increase our public green spaces and preserve our mature tree canopy? 4
13. How can we provide watercraft access to Lake Ballinger for our residents? 3
14. How can we get trash collection service at SW County Park? 0
15. How do we balance watershed/estuary restoration with enhanced opportunities for citizens
and visitors to enjoy those areas? 2
16. If investments must be prioritized (environmental restoration vs. trail/bridge reconstruction),
how should they be prioritized? 1
17. How do we get positive environmental action on our waterways and creeks? 2
18. How can we fix the environmental issues Perrinville? 4
19. How to implement the Climate Action Plan? 2
20. How can we better utilize our active volunteer community? 5
21. What can we do to increase direct human services to vulnerable populations in the city,
especially Hwy 99? 5
22. How to effectively address equity and inclusion in our work in the community? 3
23. How can we improve our organizational structure to deliver better outcomes? 1
24. How do we determine the best system for electing Councilmembers in Edmonds? 3
25. How can we improve the accountability of staff outcomes? (REDI manager, Code rewrite,
comp plan) 2
26. How to increase city revenues? 1
27. How can we achieve a balanced budget without drawing down fund balances? 5
Packet Pg. 373
7.6.a
Tallied and aggregated 7/13/23
Distributed and Councilmember replies sent directly to Beckie 7/11/23
Refined/ Consolidated 7/10/23
How Can We? Exercise from the 6/27/2023 Council Work Meeting on 2024 Budget Priorities
28. How can we have accuracy of questions and projections? 2
29. How can we evaluate consultant/ contractor spending to ensure prudent choices? 4
30. How can we collect relevant and statistically valid data for informing decision makers? 4
31. How do we work better with other south County regarding Ethics Boards? 0
7 votes:
How can we reduce/prevent property crime/ improve public safety in our city?
What can we do to reduce speeding in so many of our neighborhoods?
6 votes:
How can we accelerate street and sidewalk installation and maintenance?
5 votes:
How can we better utilize our active volunteer community?
What are non -sidewalk safety methods to protect pedestrians and non -motorized traffic?
How can we prioritize ADA compliance throughout the city?
How can we achieve a balanced budget without drawing down fund balances?
What can we do to increase direct human services to vulnerable populations in the city, especially Hwy
99?
4 votes:
How can we add a police substation to Highway 99?
How do we improve walkability in all neighborhoods?
How can we increase beautification in all business districts in Edmonds?
How can we increase our public green spaces and preserve our mature tree canopy?
How can we fix the environmental issues Perrinville?
How can we evaluate consultant/ contractor spending to ensure prudent choices?
How can we collect relevant and statistically valid data for informing decision makers?
3 votes
How do we deal with graffiti, trash and abandoned shopping cards around town?
What city buildings need repair or replacement in the near future and how can we prioritize a list to fix
them?
How can we provide watercraft access to Lake Ballinger for our residents?
How do we determine the best system for electing Councilmembers in Edmonds?
How to effectively address equity and inclusion in our work in the community
2 votes
Packet Pg. 374
7.6.a
Tallied and aggregated 7/13/23
Distributed and Councilmember replies sent directly to Beckie 7/11/23
Refined/ Consolidated 7/10/23
How Can We? Exercise from the 6/27/2023 Council Work Meeting on 2024 Budget Priorities
How do we balance watershed/estuary restoration with enhanced opportunities for citizens and visitors
to enjoy those areas?
How do we get positive environmental action on our waterways and creeks?
How can we improve the accountability of staff outcomes?
How to implement the Climate Action Plan?
1 vote
How can we significantly improve response to medical/fire emergencies at the waterfront?
If investments must be prioritized (environmental restoration vs. trail/bridge reconstruction), how
should they be prioritized?
How can we improve our organizational structure to deliver better outcomes?
How to increase city revenues?
No votes
How can we get trash collection service at SW County Park?
How do we work better with other south County regarding Ethics Boards?
Packet Pg. 375
7.6.b
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, REGARDING 2024 BUDGET PRIORITIES
WHEREAS, the City Council is responsible for setting financial policy for the City of
Edmonds; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a budget retreat on April 28, 2023 and discussed areas of
emphasis and improvements for our city over the next three to seven years; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted several public outreach efforts throughout the month of
June seeking citizen input; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023 the City Council reviewed this collected information at a Special
Meeting focused on the 2024 Council Budget Priorities;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council would like to prioritize funding in the following areas:
• Public Safety Services, including emphasis of police presence and response along
Hwy 99
• Neighborhoods — enhancing walkability, beautification, clean up and business
development
• Community Spaces — acquiring/improving parks and facilities in areas lacking
amenities
• City Government — improving transparency, function and citizen input
• Human Services — supporting Edmonds community members
• Environment — _z,, watershed restoration and moor *o,.,,, ele -y,
sustainable in astf, etic e implementation of the Climate Action Plan.
Section 2. The City Council would like to request the Administration consider the
following inquiries for the 2024 Proposed Budget:
• How can we reduce/prevent property crime/ improve public safety in our city?
• What can we do to reduce speeding in so many of our neighborhoods?
• How can we accelerate street and sidewalk installation and maintenance?
• How can we better utilize our active volunteer community?
Packet Pg. 376
7.6.b
• What are non -sidewalk safety methods to protect pedestrians and non -motorized traffic?
• How can we prioritize ADA compliance throughout the city?
• How can we achieve a balanced budget without drawing down fund balances?
• What can we do to increase direct human services to vulnerable populations in the city,
especially Hwy 99?
• How can we collect relevant and statistically valid data for informing decision makers?
• How do we improve walkability in all neighborhoods?
• How can we add a police substation to Highway 99?
• How can we increase beautification in all business districts in Edmonds?
• How can we increase our public green spaces and preserve our mature tree canopy?
• How can we fix the environmental issues affecting Perrinville watershed?
• How can we evaluate consultant/ contractor spending to ensure prudent choices?
RESOLVED this day of July 2023.
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAYOR, MIKE NELSON
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
2
Packet Pg. 377
7.7
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Approval of ordinance amending Section 8.16.040 from Edmonds City Code (ECC), amending the speed
limit along Highway 99 from 244th St. SW to 210th St. SW.
Staff Lead: Bertrand Hauss
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Rob English
Background/History
On July 11, 2023, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was placed
on the agenda for a presentation and possible approval.
Staff Recommendation
Approve Ordinance.
Narrative
The current speed limit along Highway 99 from 244th St. SW to 210th St. SW is 45 mph. The recent
conversion of the two-way left turn lane to a raised median along the entire corridor, as part of Highway
99 Revitalization project - Stage 2, will help improve safety along the corridor. The corridor has been
converted from a seven open roadway section to three (3) lane sections for northbound and
southbound movements separated by the raised center median. Since this corridor is within WSDOT
Right -of -Way, WSDOT approval is required as part of any speed limit reduction. The proposal is to
reduce the speed limit from 45 mph to 40 mph and WSDOT has approved this speed limit reduction.
This reduction to 40 mph would be consistent with the existing speed limit within the City of Shoreline
(south of 244th St SW) where a similar median exists. Based on an existing Maintenance Agreement
between WSDOT and Edmonds, the City would be responsible for any traffic sign modifications.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Presentation
Attachment 2 - Ordinance
Packet Pg. 378
ti
U
Highway 99
Speed Limit Reduction
(244th St. to 21Oth St.)
July 25t", 2023
Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer
n� Euf�
nF EL1
Background
- City recently completed the addition of a landscaped raised media
along Highway 99 from 244t" St. SW to 210t" St. SW (as part of
Highway 99 Revitalization Project —Stage 2).
- This new median replaced the center two-way left turn lane and
created a physical separation between the (3) northbound lanes ar
(3) southbound lanes.
- This new feature should improve corridor safety
vehicle speeds since drivers are now in a tighter
(compared to wide open 7lane roadway section
based on results from similar completed projects
agencies).
and reduce
roadway foot prii
in prior conditior
in other
- The existinq speed limit is 45 mph along this stretch of Hwy 99.
The speed Timit is 40 mph within Shoreline where a similar medic -
has been existing for more than (10) years.
- Any speed limit modification along this corridor needs to be
approved by WSDOT since it is within their Right -of -Way.
- Based on the existing maintenance Agreement between WSDOI
and the City, the City would be responsible for any signage
modification along Highway 99.
Recommendation
• Reduce the speed limit from 45 mph to 40
mph along Hwy 99 from 244th St. SW to
210thSt SW (consistent with speed limit
within Shoreline to the south)
• WSDOT has approved this reduction.
racket Pg. 381
7.7.b
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ECC
8.16.040 (DECREASE OF STATE LAW MAXIMUM SPEED);
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the speed limit for both northbound and southbound movements along
Highway 99 from 244th St. SW to 210th St. SW is currently 45 mph; and
WHEREAS, Highway 99 had a 7-lane section with three lanes in each direction
and a two-way left turn lane (prior to the Highway 99 Revitalization Project — Stage 2); and
WHEREAS, a landscaped raised median has recently been added along Highway
99 from 2441h St SW to 210th St. SW (as part of the Highway 99 Revitalization Project — Stage 2);
and
WHEREAS, this addition has created a physical roadway feature that both
separates movement and will help reduce vehicle speeds; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is
required to approve any speed limit modification within state right-of-way / along State Highways
(such as Hwy 99, SR-104, and SR-524); and
WHEREAS, WSDOT has approved the proposed speed limit reduction along
Highway 99 from 2441h St. SW to 2101h St. SW from 45 mph to 40 mph following the recent
completion of this project and related traffic investigations; and
WHEREAS, City of Shoreline has an existing speed limit of 40 mph along Hwy 99
(south of 244th St. SW) with a similar median; and
-1-
Packet Pg. 382
7.7.b
WHEREAS, given WSDOT approval, the City Council finds that the speed limit
along Highway 99 from 2441h St. SW to 210th St. SW should be reduced from 45 mph to 40 mph;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1
ECC 8.16.040 (Decrease of state law maximum speed) is hereby revised to read as
follows (deleted text in str-ike tht:atigh; new text in underline).
It is determined upon the basis of engineering and traffic investigation that the
speed permitted by state law outside of business and residential districts as
applicable upon the following set forth streets is greater than is reasonable or safe
under the conditions found to exist upon the streets and it is declared that the speed
limit shall be the miles per hour as herein set forth on those streets or parts of streets
as herein designated at the times herein specified when signs are erected giving
notice thereof.
Name of Street Speed
Limit
1. U.S. Highway 99 (PSH No. 1) 4540
from 220th S.W. to 228th S.W. mph
2. West side of U.S. Hwy. 99 4540
(PSH No. 1) from 220th S.W. to mph
608 feet north of 212th S.W.
3. U.S. Hwy. 99 (PSH No. 1) 4540
from 228th S.W. to 244th S.W. mph
4. Sixth Avenue South from Pine 20
to Walnut Street mph
5. 75th Place West from North 20
Meadowdale Road to the County mph
Park
6. SR 524 (portions of Puget 30
Drive, 9th Ave. N., Caspers mph
Street and 3rd Ave. N.) from 300
feet east of 88th Ave. W. to
Edmonds Street
7. SR 104 (Sunset Avenue) from 25
Main to Dayton mph
8. SR 524 (3rd Ave.) from 25
Edmonds Street to its junction mph
with SR 104 (to Pine Street and
thence east on Pine to SR 104)
Posted at All Times (or During
Daytime)
all times
all times
all times
all times
all times
all times
all times
all times
-2-
Packet Pg. 383
7.7.b
Name of Street
Speed
Posted at All Times (or During
Limit
Daytime)
9. State Highway #104
35
all times
(Edmonds Way) from South end
mph
of 5th Avenue South to 95th PI.
W.
10. SR 524 (196th S.W.) from
35
all times
300 feet east of 76th Ave. W. to
mph
300 feet east of 88th Ave. W.
11. Sunset Avenue from
20 all times
Edmonds Street to Caspers
mph
Street
12. 175th Street S.W. west of
20 all times
76th Ave. W. to the terminus
mph
thereof
Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held
to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,
clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to
the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after
passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
-3-
Packet Pg. 384
7.7.b
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
JEFFREY B. TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
m
Packet Pg. 385
7.7.b
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of
passed Ordinance No.
of the title, provides as follows:
2023, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF ECC
8.16.040 (DECREASE OF STATE LAW MAXIMUM SPEED);
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of
2023.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
-5-
Packet Pg. 386
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
2023 July Budget Amendment Ordinance
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Marissa Cain
Background/History
Amend the 2023 Ordinance No. 4310
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council approve Ordinance No. XXXX amending the 2023 Budget.
Attachments:
2023 July Budget Amendment Ordinance
2023 July Combined Decision Packages - Council Exhibits
Packet Pg. 387
8.1.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4310 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED
TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A
TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, previous actions taken by the City Council require Interfund Transfers
and increases in appropriations; and
WHEREAS, state law requires an ordinance be adopted whenever money is
transferred from one fund to another; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the amended budget appropriations and
information which was made available; and approves the appropriation of local, state, and federal
funds and the increase or decrease from previously approved programs within the 2023 Budget;
and
THEREFORE,
WHEREAS, the applications of funds have been identified;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 1. of Ordinance No. 4310 amending the final budget for the
fiscal year 2023 is hereby amended to reflect the changes shown in Exhibits A, B, C, and D adopted
herein by reference.
1
Packet Pg. 388
8.1.a
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically
delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5)
days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
M.
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED:
MAYOR, MIKE NELSON
2
Packet Pg. 389
8.1.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the th day of July, 2023, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. XXXX. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title,
provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 4310 AS A RESULT OF UNANTICIPATED TRANSFERS AND
EXPENDITURES OF VARIOUS FUNDS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2023.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
3
Packet Pg. 390
8.1.a
EXHIBIT "A": Budget Amendment Summary (July 2023)
FUND
NO.
FUND
DESCRIPTION
2023
BEGINNING
FUND BALANCE
REVENUE
EXPENDITURES
2023
ENDING
FUND BALANCE
001
GENERAL FUND
16,714,223
52,558,830
64,019,505
5,253,548
009
LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE
194,409
225,000
367,140
52,269
011
RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND
25,000
-
25,000
-
012
CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND
1,782,150
447,522
-
2,229,672
014
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND
10,522
-
5,900
4,622
016
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
3,739,645
17,480
1,275,000
2,482,125
017
MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND
848,617
-
-
848,617
018
EDMONDS HOMELESSNESS RESPONSE FUND
-
-
019
EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND
-
-
-
-
104
DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND
196,584
167,650
45,800
318,434
111
STREET FUND
547,114
2,015,410
2,746,179
(183,655)
112
COMBINED STREETCONST/IMPROVE
2,669,390
12,366,800
11,273,695
3,762,495
117
MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND
705,480
99,220
207,380
597,320
120
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND
54,624
84,400
95,400
43,624
121
EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND
76,184
38,960
26,880
88,264
122
YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND
12,808
1,660
3,000
11,468
123
TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS
97,362
30,440
28,500
99,302
125
PARK ACQ/IMPROVEMENT
3,513,005
2,320,090
4,315,418
1,517,677
126
SPECIAL CAPITAL FUND
3,771,542
2,302,980
2,227,383
3,847,139
127
G I FTS CATALOG FU N D
3,176,109
232,490
551,598
2,857,001
130
C EMETERY MAI NTENANCE/I MP ROV
267,890
150,960
291,530
127,320
136
PARKSTRUSTFUND
166,760
5,460
216,062
(43,842)
137
CEMETERY MAI NTENANCE TRUST FD
1,175,601
51,500
50,000
1,177,101
138
SISTER CITY COMMISSION
13,869
10,430
11,900
12,399
140
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND
20,801
88,645
88,575
20,871
141
AFFORDABLE & SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND
224,414
65,000
-
289,414
142
EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND
44,888
1,879,000
1,879,000
44,888
143
TREE FUND
236,162
215,100
239,800
211,462
211
LID FUND CONTROL
-
-
-
-
231
2012 LTGO DEBTSERVICE FUND
-
309,800
309,800
-
332
PARKS CONSTRUCTION
322,129
2,713,902
2,255,647
780,384
421
WATER
30,924,419
11,950,114
11,949,308
30,925,225
422
STORM
15,101,336
9,095,452
8,525,900
15,670,888
423
SEWER/TREATMENT PLANT
57,120,908
16,895,408
18,972,999
55,043,317
424
BOND RESERVE FUND
843,951
1,991,860
1,989,820
845,991
511
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND
9,730,472
4,253,740
4,966,825
9,017,387
512
TechnologyRental Fund
693,587
1,634,131
1,943,624
384,094
Totals
155,021,955
124,219,434
140,904,568
138,336,821
1
3
M
N
O
N
a+
C
d
E
L
v
R
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 391
8.1.a
EXHIBIT "B": Budget Amendments by Revenue (July 2023)
FUND
NO.
FUND
DESCRIPTION
Adopted
Budget
Ord. #4289
1/1/2023
Adopted
Amendment
Ord. #4297
3/2/2023
Adopted
Amendment
Ord. #4300
4/25/2023
Adopted
Amendment
Ord. #4310
6/20/2023
Proposed
Amendment
Ord. #
2023
Amended
Revenue
Budget
001
General Fund
$ 49,991,791
$ 360,954
$ 834,000
$
$ 1,372,085
$ 52,558,830
009
Leoff-MedlcalIns. Reserve
225,000
-
-
225,000
011
Risk Management Reserve Fund
-
-
-
012
Contingency Reserve Fund
447,522
447,522
014
Historic Preservation Gift Fund
-
-
-
016
Building Maintenance Fund
17,480
17,480
017
Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund
-
-
018
Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund
019
Edmonds Opioid Response Fund
-
-
104
Drug Enforcement Fund
167,650
-
167,650
111
Street Fund
1,815,410
-
200,000
2,015,410
112
Combined Street Const/Improve
8,308,065
2,776,000
1,282,735
-
12,366,800
117
Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
98,098
-
-
1,122
99,220
118
Memorial Street Tree
-
-
-
120
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
84,400
84,400
121
Employee Parking Permit Fund
38,960
38,960
122
Youth Scholarship Fund
1,660
1,660
123
Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
30,440
30,440
125
ParkAcq/Improvement
2,320,090
2,320,090
126
Special Capital Fund
2,302,980
-
2,302,980
127
Gifts Catalog Fund
135,340
97,150
232,490
130
Cemetery Maintenance/Improv
150,960
-
150,960
136
Parks Trust Fund
5,460
5,460
137
Cemetery Maintenance Trust I'd
51,500
51,500
138
Sister City Commission
10,430
10,430
140
Business Improvement District Fund
88,645
88,645
141
Affordable and Supportive Housing Fund
65,000
-
65,000
142
Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund
1,249,000
420,000
210,000
1,879,000
143
Tree Fund
215,100
-
-
215,100
211
Lid Fund Control
-
-
231
2012 LTGO Debt Service fund
309,800
309,800
332
Parks Construction
927,205
1,786,697
2,713,902
421
Water
11,950,114
-
-
11,950,114
422
Storm
8,903,407
117,045
75,000
9,095,452
423
Sewer/Treatment Plant
15,898,844
-
996,564
16,895,408
424
Bond Reserve Fund
1,991,860
-
1,991,860
511
Equipment Rental Fund
4,188,740
-
65,000
4,253,740
512
Technology Rental Fund
1,413,372
67,822
152,937
1,634,131
617
Firemen's Pension Fund
-
-
Totals
$ 112,956,801
1 $ 5,108,518
1 $ 2,984,257
1 $
$ 3,169,858
1 $ 124,219,434
1
3
M
N
O
N
C
d
E
v
R
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 392
8.1.a
EXHIBIT "C: Budget Amendment by Expenditure (July 2023)
FUND
NO.
FUND
DESCRIPTION
Adopted
Budget
Ord.#4289
1/1/2023
Adopted
Amendment
Ord.#4297
3/2/2023
Adopted
Amendment
Ord.#4300
4/25/2023
Adopted
Amendment
Ord.#4310
6/20/2023
Proposed
Amendment
Ord.#
2023
Amended
Expenditure
Budget
001
General Fund
$ 55,716,788
$ 1,970,899
$ 4,093,110
$
$ 2,238,708
$ 64,019,505
009
Leoff-MedlcaIIns. Reserve
367,140
-
-
-
367,140
011
Risk Management Reserve Fund
25,000
25,000
012
Contingency Reserve Fund
-
-
014
Historic Preservation Gift Fund
5,900
-
5,900
016
Building Maintenance Fund
1,215,000
60,000
1,275,000
017
Marsh Restoration & Preservation Fund
-
-
-
018
Edmonds Homelessness Response Fund
019
Edmonds Opioid Response Fund
-
-
104
Drug Enforcement Fund
45,800
45,800
111
Street Fund
2,350,969
-
232,445
162,765
2,746,179
112
Combined Street Const/Improve
7,214,960
2,776,000
1,282,735
-
11,273,695
117
Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund
182,880
24,500
-
207,380
118
Memorial Street Tree
-
-
-
120
Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund
95,400
95,400
121
Employee Pa rking Permit Fund
26,880
26,880
122
Youth Scholarship Fund
3,000
3,000
123
Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts
28,500
-
-
28,500
125
ParkAcq/Improvement
2,473,362
1,589,536
252,520
-
4,315,418
126
Special Capital Fund
1,631,812
137,000
31,700
426,871
2,227,383
127
Gifts Catalog Fund
497,598
-
-
54,000
551,598
130
Cemetery Maintenance/Improv
249,413
-
42,117
291,530
136
Parks Trust Fund
-
43,842
172,220
216,062
137
Cemetery Maintenance Trust I'd
25,000
25,000
-
50,000
138
Sister City Commission
11,900
-
11,900
140
Business Improvement District Fund
88,575
88,575
141
Affordable and Supportive Housing Fund
-
-
-
-
142
Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund
1,249,000
420,000
210,000
1,879,000
143
Tree Fund
239,800
-
-
239,800
211
Lid Fund Control
-
-
231
2012LTGO Debt Service Fund
309,800
309,800
332
Parks Construction
468,950
1,786,697
-
-
2,255,647
421
Water
11,335,050
300,000
184,061
130,197
11,949,308
422
Storm
7,603,123
483,840
205,414
233,523
8,525,900
423
Sewer/Treatment Plant
15,381,246
650,000
457,699
2,484,054
18,972,999
424
Bond Reserve Fund
1,989,820
-
-
-
1,989,820
511
Equipment Rental Fund
3,695,807
671,411
64,640
534,967
4,966,825
512
Technology Rental Fund
1,617,205
67,822
68,400
190,197
1,943,624
617
Firemen Pension Fund
-
-
-
-
-
Totals
$116,145,678
$ 10,586,547
$ 7,292,724
$
$ 6,879,619
$ 140,904,568
1
3
M
N
O
N
a+
C
d
E
v
R
r
r
Q
Packet Pg. 393
EXHIBIT "D": Budget Amendment Summary (July 2023)
8.1.a
Fund Number
Proposed
Amendment
Change in
Revenue
Proposed
Amendment
Change in Expense
Proposed
Amendment
Change in Ending
Fund Balance
001
1,372,085
2,238,708
(866,623)
011
-
-
-
111
200,000
162,765
37,235
117
1,122
-
1,122
126
-
426,871
(426,871)
127
97,150
54,000
43,150
130
42,117
(42,117)
136
-
172,220
(172,220)
142
210,000
210,000
421
-
130,197
(130,197)
422
75,000
233,523
(158,523)
423
996,564
2,484,054
(1,487,490)
511
65,000
534,967
(469,967)
512
152,937
190,197
(37,260)
Total Change
3,169,858
1 6,879,619
1 (3,709,761)
1
3
M
N
O
N
a+
C
d
E
V
R
a+
a+
Q
Packet Pg. 394
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
This decision package corrects a calculation error in the April Budget Amendment for the budgeted increase to Court
Salaries under the AFSCME Collective Bargaining Agreement for the period 1/1/2022-12/31/2024.
Municipal Court
Municipal Court
Court Salaries Correction
Uneek Mavlor
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Operating
Fund 001 GENERAL
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.23.512.51.11.00
Salaries
$ 460,000
$ 460,000
$ 460,000
$ 460,000
$ 460,000
001.000.23.512.51.23.00
Benefits
92,000
92,000
92,000
92,000
92,000
001.000.23.523.30.11.00
Salaries
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
7,000
001.000.23.523.30.23.00
Benefits
1,400
1,400
1,400
1,400
1,400
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 560,400
$ 560,400
$ 560,400
$ 560,405
$ 560,400
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$
$
$
$
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 560,400
$ 560,400
$ 560,400
$ 560,400
$ 560,400
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S 560,400
$ 560,400
$ 560,400
$ 560,400
$ 56Q 400
Packet Pg. 395
2023 July Budget Amendment
8.1.b
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
This decision packages reduces the budget for vacant positions still included in the 2023 Budget.
Unfilled Positions
Dave Turlev
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Operating
Fund 001 GENERAL
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.41.521.22.11.00
Salaries
$ 200,000
$
$
$
$
001.000.41.521.22.23.00
Benefits
25,000
001.000.64.571.22.11.00
Salaries
100,000
001.000.23.523.30.23.00
Benefits
20,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 345,000
$
1 $
1 $
1 $
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
$
S
S
S
S
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$
$
S
$
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 345,000
$
$
$
$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 345,000
$
S
S
$
Packet Pg. 396
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description: Identify individuals before Edmonds Municipal Court with substance abuse disorders or other behavioral health needs
and engage those individuals with community -based therapeutic interventions, support community justice counselors
or similar positions that work with municipal and district court drug and therapeutic court programs, connect court
participants to community services and existing resources to support completion of court requirements, additional
support for participants including bus passes and other transportation assistance (basic cell phones and phone cards
and translation services).
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Municipal Court
Municipal Court
Grant program for therapeutic interventions
Julie Espinoza for Uneek Mavlor
New Item For Council To Consider
Reimbursed by Grants or Outside Agencies
One -Time
Operating
Fund 001 GENERAL
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.23.512.51.11.00
Salaries
$ 106,970
$
$
$
$
001.000.23.512.51.23.00
Benefits
$ 25,092
001.000.23.512.51.31.00
Supplies
11,448
001.000.23.512.51.43.00
Travel
11,447
001.000.23.512.51.49.00
Other Services
6,047
Total Expenditure Increase(Decrease)
$ 161,004
$
S
$
$
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.334.01.200.00
State Grant from other Judicial Agencies
$ 161,004
$
$
$
$
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 161,004
1 $
$
S
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S
$
$
$
$
Packet Pg. 397
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
The City's contract with South County Fire will increase sometime during the year, which will require the city to make
retro payments. This amendment is to increase the annual budget for the city's Fire Contract in anticipation of the
contract change.
Finance
Fire Contract Increase
Marissa Cain
New Item For Council To Consider
1000/ Ending Fund Balance
On -Going
Operating
Fund 001 GENERAL
Name:
Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.522.20.41.50
Intergovernmental Svcs - Fire District Contract
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$
$
$
$
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
Packet Pg. 398
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
This decision adds budget authority for the school zone traffic camera leases. The leases are approximately $5,000 per
camera per month, and we are adding 2 months of budgeted revenues and expenses for 2023. 2024-2027 amounts
reflect 12 months worth of revenue and expense.
Police
Traffic Camera Leases
Marissa Cain
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Self Funded
On -Going
Operating
Fund 001 GENERAL
Name:
Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.41.591.21.70.00
Principal Payments - Leases
$ 50,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 50,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.353.10.030.00
Traffic Camera Infractions
$ 50,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 50,000
1 $ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S
S
S
S
$
Packet Pg. 399
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description: This decision package requests a new position for a grant specialist. This specialist's work will focus on bringing new
money in to the city, specifically from the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. This position
will focus initially on preparing grants for multi -modal infrastructure, the potential planning for and acquisition of the
Landmark Site, and on preparing a cross -department grant -writing work plan to support the city's most strategic
initiatives.
The costs for this position have not been fully determined. More information will be available from HR's salary
determination in the weeks before the Finance Committee meeting.
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
CD/Economic Develol
Economic Developmej
New position - Grants
Todd Tatum
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Ending Fund Balance
On -Going
Operating
Fund 001 GENERAL
Name:
Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.61.557.20.11.00
Salaries
$35,613
$142,450
$142,450
$142,450
$142,450
001.000.61.557.20.23.00
Benefits
8,138
32,550
32,550
32,550
32,550
001.000.61.557.20.31.00
Supplies
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 48,751
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
S
S
$
$
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 48,751
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 48,751
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
$ 180,000
Packet Pg. 400
2023 July Budget Amendment
8.1.b
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description: Authorization to disburse grant funds that were received under the Connecting Housing to Infrastructure (CHIP) grant
program administered by the Washington State Department of Commerce and funded by America Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA) state and local fiscal recovery funds. The city executed a capital agreement with the Department of Commerce on
June 13 to receive grant funding in the amount of $1,361,011, and subsequently approved a grant agreement with Housing
Hope to disburse said grant funds on a reimbursement basis for utility -infrastructure construction -related expenses for the
Edmonds Lutheran Church Field Apartments. Work must be completed by December 31, 2024.
and
ITitle: ICHIP Grant Funds for Housin¢ Hone Field Apartment Proiect I
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
ew Item For Council To Consider
2nd Quarter Budget Amendment
Jun 6 2023
Reimbursed by Grants or Outside Agencies
One -Time
Operating
Fund 1 001 GENERAL
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.518.63.41.00
Community Relief Funds
$ 11361,011
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
S 1,361,011
$
$
$
$
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.333.21.027.00
Connecting Housing to Infrastructure Program CHIP
$ 1,361,011
$
$
$
$
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 1,361,011
$
$
$
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$
$
S
$
$
Packet Pg. 401
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description: The council -approved expansion of the parks maintenance division of new employees and related vehicles, trailers,
equipment and supplies has increased the space needs which exceeds the existing parks shop facility. Other options
were evaluated and deemed not feasible and the resulting solution is the lease of a commerical property in south
Edmonds. The 2023 expenses related to the lease starting August 1, 2023 are $35,000 and are available through
existing maintenance division salary savings. The lease agreement was approved by City Council on June 20, 2023.
Any future costs will be addressed as part of the 2024 proposed budget.
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Parks
Parks Maintenance Yard Lease
An¢ie Feser
Previously Discussed By Council
Jun 20 2023
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Operating
Fund I 001 GENERAL
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.64.576.80.11.00
Salaries
$ 35,000
$
S
001.000.64.576.80.45.00
Operating Rental and Leases
35,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$
S
$
$
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
$
S
$
$
S
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
S
S
$
$
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$
S
$
$
$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$
S
$
$
$
Packet Pg. 402
Prcvio,2&P%V&4,Pgy,F,RffgtAgF� 2022)
8.1.b
Budget Amendment for:
July 25, 2023
Item Description:
The City is in the process of making repairs to the library from water damage that was incurred prior to this year.
Nearly all of the rehab costs will ultimately be reimbursed by insurance. Because the city is able to deduct the
amount of city -incurred expenses from Sno-Isle reimbursement, this decision package adjusts the budget for the
amount that is owed for the repairs.
Department:
Public Works
Fund
Name:
001 GENERAL
Division:
IIIuilding Maintenance
Title:
Repairs to Library
Preparer:
Budget Amendment Type
New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
Reimbursed by Grants or Outside Agencies
What is the nature of the expenditure?
One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
ICapital
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
001.000.66.594.19.62.00
Buildings
$ 300,000
$
S
$
$
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 300,000
$
S
S
$
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
001.000.395.40.000.00
Insurance Recovery
$ 300,000
$
$
S
$
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 300,000
$
$
S
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
S
$
S
$
$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S
$
S
S
$
Packet Pg. 403
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
In 2021, $25,000 was transferred from the General Fund into the Risk Management Fund. This decision package adds
authority to the budget to transfer that $25,000 from the Risk Management Fund back into the General Fund.
Finance
Risk Management Transfer
Dave Turlev
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Operating
Fund MULTIPLE
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
011.000.39.597.19.55.01
Interfund Transfer to Fund 001
$ 25,000
$
$
$
$
011.000.39.518.61.49.00
Miscellaneous
25,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$
$
S
$
$
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.397.19.011.00
Interfund Transfer from Fund 011
$ 25,000
$
$
$
S
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 25,000
1 $
$
$
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 25,000
$
$
$
$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 25,000
$
S
S
$
10
Packet Pg. 404
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
The Street Fund's revenue has not kept up with expenses over the years, and on 7/18/2023, the city council approved a
$20 increase to the annual vehicle license renewal fee in order to bridge this gap. This decision package adds the
estimated new revenues to the budget.
Streets
Public Works
Car Tabs Revenue Increase
Marissa Cain
Previously Discussed By Council
Jul 18 2023
100%Ending Fund Balance
On -Going
Operating
Fund 111 STREET
Name:
Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
S
$
S
$
$
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
111.000.317.60.000.00
TBD Vehicle Fee
$ 200,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 200,000
1 $ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
111.000.68.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
200,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S 200,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
$ 700,000
11
Packet Pg. 405
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
On June 27th, the City Council awarded the construction contract for the Citywide Bicycle Improvement Project. The
increase in funding for the construction phase was $299,230 in REET 126 funds. Pre-existing REET funding
($251,255) in the 2023 budget will be repurposed from the 76th Ave Overlay/2023 Overlay projects to this project for
construction.
Public Works
Rob
Previously Discussed By Council
2nd Quarter Budget Amendment
Jun 27 2023
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Ca ital
Fund 126 REET 1
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
126.000.68.595.33.65.00
Construction Projects - Roadway
$ 266,567
$
$
$
$
126.000.68.542.30.41.67
Interfund Services - Roadway
31,645
126.000.64.597.73.55.17
Transfer to Fund 117
1,018
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 299,230
$
S
S -
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
117.200.397.73.126.00
Interfund Transfer
$ 1,018
$
$
$
$
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 1,018
1 $
$
S
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
126.000.64.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 299,230
$
$
$
$
117.200.64.508.40.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
1,018
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
(298,212)1
S
I S
I S
I$
12
Packet Pg. 406
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 18, 2023
Description:
The council -approved Landmark Property Option Agreement requires a $100,000 payment. On June 27, 2023 the City
Council authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement and payment of $100,000. This budget amendment is using
funding from the land acquisition account.
Department: I Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Division: iParks Fund 126 REET 1
Title: Landmark Property Option Agreement payment Name
Preparer: Angie Feser
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Previously Discussed By Council
2nd Quarter Budget Amendment
Jun 27 2023
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Capital
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
126.000.64.594.76.61.00
Land
$ 100,000
$
$
$
$
Total Expenditure Increase(Decrease)
$ 100,000
$
$
S
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$
$
S
S
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
126.000.64.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 100,000
$
$
$
$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 100,000
$
S
S
S
13
Packet Pg. 407
2023 July Budget Amendment
8.1.b
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Item Description:
At the suggestion of the Administrative Services Department it is proposed that Fund 136 - Parks Trust Fund which
was established by ordinance 3466 be closed. Finance periodically reviews city funds to identify unused funds that
should be closed. Fund 136 has three programs (100, 200 & 300). Program 100 pertains to the beautification program
and staff recommends this fund balance be transferred to Fund 127-100, the new beautification fund. Program 200
pertains to the Beach Ranger Program that is now funded out of the general fund. Annual expenditures for this
program exceed the fund balance and staff recommends the balance be transferred to the general fund. Program 300
pertains to Yost Pool operations, annual operations of the pool exceed the fund balance and are currently funded out of
the eeneral fund and staff recommends this balance be transferred to the 2eneral fund.
Department:
Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Fund
Name:
MULTIPLE FUND
7
Division:
Parks Trust Fund
Title:
Close out Fund 136 - Parks Trust Fund
Preparer:
Shannon Burley
Budget Amendment Type New Item For Council To Consider
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 100°/u Self Funded
What is the nature of the expenditure? One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
136.100.64.597.19.55.27
Parks Trust - Transfer to 127
$ 97,150
$
$
$
$
136.200.64.597.19.55.01
Parks Trust - Interfund Transfer
70,655
136.300.64.597.19.55.01
Parks Trust - Interfund Transfer
4,415
136.100.64.573.30.41.00
Professional Services
Total Expenditure Increase(Decrease)
$ 172,220
$
$
S
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
127.300.397.73.136.00
Gift Catalog -Transfer from Fund 136
$ 97,150
$
$
$
$
001.000.397.19.136.00
General Fund - Interfund Transfer from 136
70,655
001.000.397.19.136.00
General Fund - Interfund Transfer from 136
4,415
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 172,220
$
S
S
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 75,070
$
$
$
$
136.100.64.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
97,150
136.200.64.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
70,655
136.300.64.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
4,415
127.300.64.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
97,150
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S
$
S
S
S
14
Packet Pg. 408
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Ordinance 4310 was passed on June 20th, 2023 and added a one time expenditure of $210,000 from the ARPA Funds
account to provide financial support to the Edmonds School District. This decision package adds the budget authority
to distribute these funds.
Council
ARPA Fund
Edmonds School District
Marissa Cain
Previously Discussed By Council
Jun 20 2023
Reimbursed by Grants or Outside Agencies
One -Time
Operating
Fund 142 EDMONDS CARES
Name: FUND
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
142.000.39.518.63.41.00
Community Relief Funds
$ 210,000
$
$
$
$
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 210,000
$
S
S -
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
142.000.333.21.019.00
Community Relief Funds
$ 210,000
$
$
$
$
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 210,000
1 $
$
S
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S
S
S
S
$
15
Packet Pg. 409
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description: The City received a $50,000 grant from the Department of Ecology to implement programs required by our Western
Washington Municipal Stormwater Permit. The grant was recently amended to add an addtional $25,000. Funds will
be used to purchase two storm pipe inspection cameras, pay for storm maintenance staff training, and reinbursement
of a portion of the expenditures in preparing the stormwater management action plan, which is part of the Storm
Comprehensive Plan.
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Public Works
Stormwater Capacity Grant
Michele (Mike) De Lilla
Fund 422 STORM
Name:
New Item For Council To Consider
$50k approved by Council 12/13/22. Additional $25k apprvd by Council 3/21/23.
Reimbursed by Grants or Outside Agencies
One -Time
Capital
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
422.000.72.594.31.64.00
Storm Pipe Insection Cameras
S 56,474
$
$
$
$
422.000.72.531.90.41.00
Professional Services
18,526
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 75,000
$
S
S -
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
422.000.334.03.103.00
Dept of Ecology Grant
$ 75,000
$
$
$
$
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 75,000
$
$
S
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S
S
S
S
$
16
Packet Pg. 410
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description: NATURAL GAS. Used during start-up for dryer unit and gasification system. Estimate for future years, will adjust as
needed in following years' budgets. Possible increased usage in 2023 if dryer is used to produce class A biosolids for
disposal in leiu of hauling wet cake to Oregon while gasification system issues continue to be resolved. Hauling and
disposal of class A locally would create a tremendous overall cost savings compared to hauling wet biosolids out of
state.
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Public Works
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Natural Gas
Ross Hahn
Previously Approved Budget By Council
2023 Adopted Budget
Reimbursed by Grants or Outside Agencies
On -Going
Operating
Fund 423 SEWER / TREATMENT
Name: PLANT
Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
423.000.76.535.80.47.63
Natural Gas
$ 25,000
$ 20.000
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 25,000
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
$ 20,000
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
423.000.343.50.400.00
Mountlake Terrace 23.174%
$ 5,794
$ 4,635
$ 4,635
$ 4,635
$ 4,635
423.000.343.50.300.00
Olympic View 16.551%
4,138
3,310
3,310
3,310
3,310
423.000.343.50.500.00
Ronald WD - Shoreline 9.488%
2,372
1,898
1,898
1,898
1,898
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
S 12,304
1 $ 9,843
1 $ 9,843
1 $ 9,843
1 $ 9,843
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
423.000.75.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
(12,696)
10,157
10,157
10,157
10,157
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 12,696
$ 10,157
$ 10,157
$ 10,157
$ 10,157
17
Packet Pg. 411
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for:
July 25, 2023
Item Description:
SOLID WASTE/RECYCLING: Slugde hauling costs are approximately $6,000 each day, seven days a week. This
expense is anticipated to continue through at least September 2023. However, this budget amendment is proposing that
sludge hauling costs be budgeted through the end of 2023. The current expenditure through the end of May 2023 is
over budget by $638,023. Projecting this same expense through the end of the year results in a budget increase of
approximately $1,700,000. To account for contigencies we are increasing the amout for 2023 to $2,000,000. This
number could significantly decrease if we are able to process class A biosolids through the dryer and dispose of locally
while the gasification system is completed. $125,360 current budget + $638,023 over through May = $763,383.
763 383/5 months = 152 677/month x 12 months = 1 832 124/12 months.
Department:
Public Works
Fund
Name:
423 SEWER / TREATMENT
PLANT
Division:
Wastewater Treatment Plant
Title:
Solid Waste Recycling/Hauling Costs
Preparer:
Ross Hahn
Budget Amendment Type
Previously Approved Budget By Council
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
2023 Adopted Budget
How is this amendment funded?
Reimbursed by Grants or Outside Agencies
What is the nature of the expenditure?
One -Time
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
423.000.76.535.80.47.66
Solild Waste/Recyclilng
$ 2,000,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 2,000,000
$
S
S
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
423.000.343.50.400.00
Mountlake Terrace 23.174%
$ 463,480
$
$
$
$
423.000.343.50.300.00
Olympic View 16.551%
$ 331,020
423.000.343.50.500.00
Ronald WD 9.488%
$ 189,760
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 984,260
1 $
$
$
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
423.000.75.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
1,015,740
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 1,015,740
$
1 S
1 S
1$
18
Packet Pg. 412
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Item Description: This decision package corrects the salary and benefits budget for the WWTP Program Administrator, which was
removed by management during the 2023 Budget process. Finance staff later discovered that the contract had been
extended to 4/30/2024, and was approved on 4/19/2022.
C
d
Department:
Sewer Utility Fund
Fund
Name:
q
423SEWER /TREATMENT
PLANT
E
=
tV
E
Q
Division:
WWTP
Title:
WWTP Program Administrator
Preparer:
Marissa Cain
Budget Amendment Type
New Item For Council To Consider
4
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
7
m
How is this amendment funded?
100% Ending Fund Balance
7
What is the nature of the expenditure?
On -Going
M
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Operating
O
N
El
E%Denditure Increase (Decrease)
Fill out on-eoine costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
423.000.76.535.80.11.00
Salaries
$ 126,156
$ 126,156
$
$
$
423.000.76.535.80.23.00
Benefits
$ 66,144
66,144
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 192,300
$ 192,300
$
$
$
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$
$
$
S
S
F,ndinu Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
423.000.75.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 192,300
$ 192,300
$
$
$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 192,300
$ 192,300
1 S
I$
19
Packet Pg. 413
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description: Authorization to order 2 of the 2024 scheduled replacements in advance of the approved 2024 budget. Vehicle and
equipment aquisition has presented many challenges recently, resulting in limited availability and increased pricing.
Longer lead times for these replacements are projected to be in excess of 18 months. One of the vehicles due for
replacement is the Sewer Division's Jet truck #98. This equipment is essential for the sewer division's daily operations
to clear sewer backups, maintain clear flow throughout 196 miles of sewer pipe, and inspect and rate the condition of
our sewer pipes with push cameras. The other replacement is to consolidate the function of 2 trailers that no longer
satisfy the needs of the department. A 1996 Walton trailer and 2007 Towmaster would be replaced with a more
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Public Works - Equipment Rental Fund
Fleet
Unscheduled Vehicle Replacement
Carl Ruee
New Item For Council To Consider
2nd Quarter Budget Amendment
Jun 20 2023
One -Time
Ca ital
Fund 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
Equipment - B Fund
$ 340,000
$
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
Equipment - B Fund
35,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 375,000
$
S
S -
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$
$
S
S
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
511.100.77.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 375,000
$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 375,000
$
I S
I S
I$
20
Packet Pg. 414
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description: Purchase one vehicle replacement- On 10/21/22 one of the 2019 Ford Explorer Police Utility Interceptor vehicles was
involved in a collision. The vehicle was deemed a total loss. This vehicle was insured for full replacement cost. WCIA
insurance has issued partial payment in the amount of $21,020.84 and will pay the remaining costs once the
replacement vehicle is received up to $65,000. Increased vehicle costs and specialty K9 equipment will require
additional costs to replace. The remaining balance is fully funded through the 511 B-Fund.
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Public Works - Equipment Rental Fund
Fleet
Unscheduled Vehicle Replacement
Carl Ruee
New Item For Council To Consider
2nd Quarter Budget Amendment
Jun 20 2023
Partially Funded
One -Time
Capital
Fund 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
511.100.77.594.48.64.00
Equipment - B Fund
$ 80,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 80,000
$
S
S
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
511.100.372.00.000.00
Insurance Recovery
$ 65,000
$
$
$
$
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 65,000
$
$
S
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
511.100.77.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 15,000
$
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 15,000
$
I S
I S
I$
21
Packet Pg. 415
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for:
July 18, 2023
Item Description:
Addition of one Full Time Employee (FTE) position - This position will provide much needed support to the Fleet
Division to account for the ongoing growth of the city fleet. By providing one additional FTE the Fleet department
would become more resilient and benefit most departments throughout the city. The Fleet Department could provide
improved emergency response support, emergency vehicle support, reduced shop time on repairs and maintenance,
and reduced outsourced labor costs. Since 2008, when the fleet staff was reduced to 2 FTE mechanics, the fleet has
experienced gradual growth throughout the city. The Fleet Division is currently operating with 2 FTE mechanics
responsible for the maintenance, repair, up fitting, and surplussing of these assets. Although, all new vehicle additions
are not in service yet. the onboardin2 urocess of recruitment efforts hirin2.and trainin re uire consideration.
Department:
Public Works - Equipment Rental Fund
Fleet Fund
FTE Mechanic Name:
Carl Rugg
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Budget Amendment Type
New Item For Council To Consider
2nd Quarter Budget Amendment
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
Jun 23 2023
How is this amendment funded?
100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure?
On -Going
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
511.000.77.548.68.11.00
Salaries
$ 28,852
$ 90,884
$ 95,428
$ 100,199
$ 105,209
511.000.77.548.68.23.00
Benefits
10,000
31,500
33,075
34,729
36,465
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
S 38,852
$ 122,384
$ 128,503
$ 134,928
$ 141,674
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
S
$
$
$
$
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
511.000.77.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 38,852
$ 122,384
$ 128,503
$ 134,928
$ 141,674
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 38,852
$ 122,384
$ 128,503
$ 134,928
$ 141,674
22
Packet Pg. 416
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Item Description:
Division:
Title:
Preparer:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
adjust for the Teamsters contract wages and benefits retro payment and to move the annual salary increase for the
*ks department into the correct Funds, approved by Council in January of 2023. This entry was accidentally omitted
in the adjustments made as part of the April budget amendment.
Finance
Teamsters Retro
Marissa Cain
Previously Discussed By Council
January 2023
100 % Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Operating
Fund I MULTIPLE FUNDS
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
511.000.77.548.68.11.00
Salaries
$ 34,667
$
$
$
$
511.000.77.548.68.23.00
Benefits
6,448
001.000.66.518.30.11.00
Salaries
123,138
001.000.66.518.30.23.00
Benefits
22,904
001.000.64.576.80.11.00
Salaries
169,558
001.000.64.576.80.23.00
Benefits
31,538
130.000.64.536.20.11.00
Salaries
15,276
130.000.64.536.20.23.00
Benefits
2,841
423.000.75.535.80.11.00
Salaries
104,613
423.000.75.535.80.23.00
Benefits
19,458
422.000.72.531.70.11.00
Salaries
121,805
422.000.72.531.70.23.00
Benefits
22,656
111.000.68.542.60.11.00
Salaries
137,239
111.000.68.542.60.23.00
Benefits
25,526
423.000.76.535.80.11.00
Salaries
92,505
423.000.76.535.80.23.00
Benefits
17,206
421.000.74.534.80.11.00
Salaries
97,515
421.000.74.534.80.23.00
Benefits
18,138
001.000.64.576.80.11.00
Salaries
65,000
001.000.64.576.80.23.00
Benefits
13,000
127.300.64.576.81.11.00
Salaries
45,000
127.300.64.576.81.23.00
Benefits
9,000
130.000.64.536.20.11.00
Salaries
20,000
130.000.64.536.20.23.00
Benefits
4,000
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 1,063,031
$
$
$
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
$
$
$
$
$
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$
S
$
$
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 269,138
$
$
$
$
511.000.77.508.89.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
41,115
423.000.75.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
233,782
422.000.72.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
144,461
421.000.74.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
115,653
111.000.68.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
162,765
127.300.64.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
54,000
130.000.64.508.40.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
(42,117)
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 1,063,031
$
$
$
$
23
Packet Pg. 417
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description: This decision package covers software items that were in the Engineering / Water / Streets budget to be moved to the
information services budget. They were removed from the various department budgets and were omitted from the IS
budget. Software includes AutoTURN, Syncro, GraniteNET + Inspections, GPS cm accrcy, GIS Web App, AutoCAD /
Civil 31), InfoWater, MGS Flood, XP SWMM, Drone 3D Software, HeadLight Fieldbook fleet.
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
Administrative Services
Information Services
Maintenance Cost Increases
Brian Tulev
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Ending Fund Balance
On -Going
Operating
Fund MULTIPLE
Name:
Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Repair and Maintenance
$ 48,370
$ 48,370
$ 48,370
$ 48,370
$ 48,370
001.000.67.518.21.45.11
Interfund Rental
1,215
1,215
1,215
1,215
1,215
001.000.65.518.20.45.11
Interfund Rental
3,643
3,643
3,643
3,643
3,643
423.000.75.535.80.45.11
Interfund Rental
15,390
15,390
15,390
15,390
15,390
422.000.72.531.90.45.11
Interfund Rental
13,804
13,804
13,804
13,804
13,804
421.000.71.534.80.45.11
Interfund Rental
14,319
14,319
14,319
14,319
14,319
Total Expenditure Increase(Decrease)
$ 96,741
$ 96,741
$ 96,741
$ 96,741
$ 96,741
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
512.000.348.00.000.00
Rental Charge A Fund
$ 48,370
$ 48,370
$ 48,370
$ 48,370
$ 48,370
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 48,370
1 $ 48,370
1 $ 48,370
1 $ 48,370
1 $ 48,370
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 4,858
$ 4,858
$ 4,858
$ 4,858
$ 4,858
421.000.74.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
14,319
14,319
14,319
14,319
14,319
422.000.72.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
13,804
13,804
13,804
13,804
13,804
423.000.75.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
15,390
15,390
15,390
15,390
15,390
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 48,371
$ 48,371
$ 48,371
$ 48,371
$ 48,371
24
Packet Pg. 418
2023 July Budget Amendment
8.1.b
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
This decision package covers increases from 2022 to 2023 in software and hardware maintenance. Packages include
Adobe, Eden, network firewall maintenance, vulnarabilty scanner maintenance video conferencing, email archiving
and the electronic badge door system.
Administrative Services
Information Services
Maintenance Cost Increases
Brian Tulev
New Item For Council To Consider
I00°/ Ending Fund Balance
On -Going
Operating
Fund MULTIPLE
Name:
Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Repair and Maintenance
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
001.000.11.511.60.45.11
Interfund Rental
463
463
463
463
463
001.000.21.513.10.45.11
Interfund Rental
366
366
366
366
366
001.000.22.518.10.45.11
Interfund Rental
799
799
799
799
799
001.000.23.512.51.45.11
Interfund Rental
1,806
1,806
1,806
1,806
1,806
001.000.31.514.23.45.11
Interfund Rental
1,903
1,903
1,903
1,903
1 1,903
001.000.31.514.31.45.11
Interfund Rental
645
645
645
645
645
001.000.39.522.20.45.11
Interfund Rental
243
243
243
243
243
001.000.41.521.10.45.11
Interfund Rental
8,346
8,346
8,346
8,346
8,346
001.000.61.557.20.45.11
Interfund Rental
3,504
3,504
3,504
3,504
3,504
001.000.62.524.10.45.11
Interfund Rental
941
941
941
941
941
001.000.62.524.20.45.11
Interfund Rental
887
887
1 887
887
887
001.000.62.558.60.45.11
Interfund Rental
1,175
1,175
1,175
1,175
1,175
001.000.64.571.22.45.11
Interfund Rental
2,281
2,281
2,281
2,281
2,281
001.000.65.518.20.45.11
Interfund Rental
1,924
1,924
1,924
1,924
1,924
001.000.67.518.21.45.11
Interfund Rental
1,215
1,215
1,215
1,215
1,215
421.000.74.534.80.45.11
Interfund Rental
225
225
225
225
225
422.000.72.531.90.45.11
Interfund Rental
154
154
154
154
154
423.000.75.535.80.45.11
Interfund Rental
225
225
225
225
225
423.000.76.535.80.45.11
Interfund Rental
16,205
16,205
16,205
16,205
16,205
Total Expenditure Increase(Decrease)
$ 86,614
$ 86,614
$ 86,614
$ 86,614
$ 86,614
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
512.000.348.00.000.00
Rental Charge A Fund
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
S 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 26,498
$ 26,498
$ 26,498
$ 26,498
$ 26,498
421.000.74.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
225
225
225
225
225
422.000.72.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
154
154
154
154
154
423.000.75.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
16,430
16,430
16,430
16,430
16,430
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
$ 43,307
25
Packet Pg. 419
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Item Description: This decision package increases licensing on the Clerks records library portal and land use document portal. The city
is recently experiencing high usage levels leading to unavailable resources due to lack of available licensing. This is a
public facing portal and citizens are experiencing access issues.
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
ve Services
Services
Cost Increases
New Item For Council To Consider
100% Ending Fund Balance
On -Going
Operating
Fund MULTIPLE FUNDS
Name:
Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Repair and Maintenance
$ 24,000
$ 4,000
$ 4,000
$ 4,000
$ 4,000
001.000.62.524.20.45.11
Interfund Rental -Bldg
2,280
380
380
380
380
001.000.31.514.31.45.11
Interfund Rental -clerk
2,856
476
476
476
476
001.000.23.512.51.45.11
InterfundRental-court
5,136
856
856
856
856
001.000.62.524.10.45.11
Interfund Rental-dev sves
1,704
284
284
284
284
001.000.67.518.21.45.11
Interfund Rental- engineering
7,440
1,240
1,240
1,240
1,240
423.000.76.535.80.45.11
Interfund Rental-wwtp
1,152
192
192
192
192
001.000.62.558.60.45.11
Interfund Rental- planning
3,432
572
572
572
572
Total Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
$ 48,000
$ 8,000
$ 8,000
$ 8,000
$ 8,000
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
512.000.348.00.000.00
Rental Charge A Fund
$ 24,600
$ 4,000
$ 4,000
$ 4,000
$ 4,000
Total Revenue Increase (Decrease)
$ 24,000
$ 4,000
$ 4,000
$ 4,000
$ 4.000
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
001.000.39.508.00.00.00
ENDING CASH & INVESTMENTS -GENERAL
$ (22,848)
$ (3,808)
$ (3,808)
$ (3,808)
$ (3,808)
423.000.75.508.00.00.00
ENDING CASH & INVESTMENTS -SEWER
(1,152)
(192)
(192)
(192)
(192)
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
1 $ (24,000)
$ (4,000)
$ (4,000)
$ (4,000)
$ (4,000)
26
Packet Pg. 420
2023 July Budget Amendment
8.1.b
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Item Description:
Two decision packages were approved in the September 13, 2022 for ongoing budget adjustments. One accommodates
increases in Microsoft pricing, the second funded ongoing system security to better protect against cybersecurity
concerns for remote work. The packages were incorrectly added to the budget amendment as a negative amount.
Instead of increasing Information Services budget to accommodate the approved expenses, the entry reduced the
information services budget. This decision package restores the original funding plus the approved amounts from the
2022 decision package. The department interfund rental expenditures were coded incorrectly in September of 2022
and carryforward to 2023. This entry only effects the information technology fund.
Department:
Administrative Services
Fund
Name:
512 TECHNOLOGY
RENTAL FUND
Division:
Information Services
Title:
Maintenance Cost Increases
PCOnarer:
Brian Tulev
Budget Amendment Type Previously Approved Budget By Council
2022 Adopted Budget
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded? 100% Ending Fund Balance
What is the nature of the expenditure? On -Going
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital? Operating
Expenditure Increase (Decrease) Fill out on going costs & revenues
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Repair and Maintenance Microsoft Ad'
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Repair and Maintenance For Sept 22 Correction
18,760
18,760
18,760
18,760
18,760
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Repair and Maintenance c bersecuri
18,500
18,500
18,500
18,500
18,500
512.000.31.518.88.48.00
Repair and Maintenance For Sept 22 Correction
18,500
18,500
18,500
18,500
18,500
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 74,520
$ 74,520
$ 74,520
$ 74,520
$ 74,520
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
512.000.348.00.000.00
Rental Charge A Fund For Sept 22 Correction
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
512.000.348.00.000.00
Rental Charge A Fund or Sept 22 Correction
18,500
18,500
18,500
18,500
18,500
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 37,260
1 $ 37,260
1 $ 37,260
1 $ 37,260
1 $ 37.260
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
512.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance for Sept 22 Correction
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
$ 18,760
512.000.39.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance for Sept 22 Correction
18,500
18,500
18,500
18,500
18,500
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
$ 37,260
$ 37,260
$ 37,260
$ 37,260
$ 37,260
27
Packet Pg. 421
8.1.b
2023 July Budget Amendment
Budget Amendment for: July 25, 2023
Description:
Budget Amendment Type
Date of Discussion or Budget Approval?
How is this amendment funded?
What is the nature of the expenditure?
Is the Expenditure Operating or Capital?
Expenditure Increase (Decrease)
On June 27th, the City Council awarded the construction contract for the Elm Way Walkway project. The additional
funds programmed for the construction phase was $27,641 in REET 126 funds. Existing stormwater utility funding
($43,522) in the 2023 budget will be transferred from the 2023 Stormwater replacement project to this project for
construction.
Public Works
Elm Way Wa
Rob Enelish
Previously Discussed By Council
2nd Quarter Budget Amendment
Jun 27 2023
100% Ending Fund Balance
One -Time
Ca ital
Fund MULTIPLE
Name:
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
126.000.68.595.33.65.00
Construction Projects - Roadway
$ 27,641
$
$
$
$
422.000.72.597.73.55.17
Transfer to Fund 117
104
Total Expenditure Increase Decrease
$ 27,745
$
S
S -
S
Revenue Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
117.200.397.73.411.00
Interfund Transfer In
$ 104
$
$
$
$
Total Revenue Increase Decrease
$ 104
$
$
$
S
Ending Fund Balance Increase (Decrease)
Account Number
Description
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
126.000.64.508.30.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
$ 27,641
$
$
$
$
422.000.72.508.00.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
104
117.200.64.508.40.00.00
Ending Fund Balance
104
Total Ending Fund Balance Increase Decrease
S (27,641)1
S
I S
I S
I$
28
Packet Pg. 422
8.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Resolution for Annexation into RFA
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Dave Turley
Background/History
The City is currently considering the possibility and ramifications of annexation into the South
Snohomish County Regional Fire Authority. In order to work with the RFA and perform this analysis, the
City Council needs to pass a Resolution notifying the RFA of this intent.
Staff Recommendation
Approval on Consent.
Narrative
The purpose of this Resolution is to provide official communication to the RFA that the City intends to
investigate the advantages and disadvantages of annexation, and that we would like the RFA to
investigate the ramifications to them as well.
It will be noted that the Resolution states that the city "requests annexation into the South Snohomish
County Regional Fire." This is the language preferred by the RFA to let them know that the City intends
to begin researching the ramifications of annexation, and this language is in alignment with the language
used in the applicable RCW. By using this language we are asking the RFA to begin their process and
analysis. A decision will be made by Council later this year or in early 2024 whether or not to proceed
with annexation, which would need to be done by placing the measure on a ballot.
Attachments:
Resolution Re RFA Annexation
Packet Pg. 423
RESOLUTION NO. XXXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON EXPRESSING THE INTENT TO PURSUE THE BENEFITS OF
RECEIVING FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FROM THE SOUTH
SNOHOMISH COUNTY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY VIA ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds ("the City") and the South Snohomish County Fire &
Rescue Regional Authority ("SCF") share a contiguous border along the City's Eastern boundary;
and
WHEREAS, the City is a fire protection jurisdiction as defined in RCW 52.26.020(3); and
WHEREAS, RCW 52.26 authorizes two or more fire protection jurisdictions to participate
in a regional fire services authority commonly known as a regional fire authority or "RFA' ; and
WHEREAS, the City and SCF are interested in pursuing the potential operational
efficiencies and cost savings over other available service providers, as a result of annexing into
SCF; and
WHEREAS, both the City and SCF believe that the public health and safety of the citizens
they serve will benefit from annexation into SCF;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, THAT:
Section 1. Pursuant to RCW 52.26.300(2), the City requests annexation into the South
Snohomish County Regional Fire, subject to the provisions of RCW 52.26.300(3) and voter
approval.
Section 2. The City Clerk is instructed to file this Resolution with the Governing Board of
SCF in accordance with RCW 52.26.300(2).
Resolved this day of 2023.
APPROVED:
MIKE NELSON, MAYOR
Packet Pg. 424
8.2.a
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
SCOTT PASSEY, CITY CLERK
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.:
Packet Pg. 425
8.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 07/25/2023
Project Update: Tree Code Amendments
Staff Lead: Deb Powers
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Deb Powers
Staff Recommendation
No action is required at this meeting. Staff will provide a brief presentation on the status of the tree
code amendment project and answer questions from City Council. The Planning Board continues to hold
work sessions on potential amendments to the tree code, and the City Council will hold a public hearing
later this year to consider the Planning Board's recommendation.
Narrative
The City Council last received a project update on the Tree Code Update at their January 17, 2023
meeting. Since that time, staff and its consultant team have conducted a series of community meetings,
surveys, and stakeholder interviews as well as solicited input from the Planning Board and Tree Board,
including a June 28 joint meeting of the two boards. Staff will provide a brief summary of public
engagement efforts and community feedback as well as Planning Board direction and Tree Board input
on:
1) amendments to the existing development -related code, Chapter 23.10 of the Edmonds
Community Development Code; and
2) new property owner tree removal allowances, which the City Council provided initial direction on
at their June 1, 2021 meeting.
The Planning Board is scheduled to hold work sessions to review draft tree code language at their
August 23 and September 13, 2023 meetings, with the public hearing occurring as soon as October 11,
2023. Per ECDC 20.80.020, the Planning Board will make a formal recommendation to City Council at the
conclusion of their public hearing.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - June 1, 2021 City Council Minutes
Attachment 2 - June 28 Planning Board and Tree Board Meeting Minutes
Packet Pg. 426
her a picture of a DADU and it looks like just another house. She was concerned about upzoning and not
having transition zones. Citizens need to know where and how rather than everything being carte blanche.
Hearing no opposition, Ms. Hope assumed there was Council consensus to proceed with those items and
schedule a special study session.
3. STAGE 2 TREE ISSUES
Development Services Director Hope said this is a follow up on an issue the Council has considered over
several months. The Council adopted new regulations related to development following up on the UFMP
and other work. Council has also been interested in doing things beyond that.
Environmental Program Manager Kernen Lien explained when the Council was working on tree code
regulations that applied to developing sites, a number of Stage 2 items were identified for future updates.
Some are underway now and nearing completion such as Inventory of Downtown Trees, Street Tree Plan
Update, and Tree Canopy Assessment. He displayed a list of Upcoming Tree -Related Items and Timing,
explaining the shaded items will go to the Planning Board and the Planning Board has requested clear
direction from Council on those items.
Item
Timing
Inventory of downtown street trees
Q2 2021-Q3 2021
Inventory of other public trees
2022 or TBD
Street Tree Plan update
Q2 2021-Q4 20221
Tree canopy assessment
Q2 2021-Q3 2021
Heritage Tree Program
Q32021-Q4 2021
Tree Canopy Goal
Q3 2021
Assessment of staffing and other resource needs
Q2 2021 -2022 or TBD
Incentive program using stormwater utility fee reductions
Q4 2021-2022 or TBD
Exploration of other incentive programs
2022 or TBD
Open sace acquisition
Q4 2021-2022 or TBD
Tree retention on private property (not related to development)
Q4 202
Partnerships with other organizations
Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD
Annual reports on City tree activities
Q2 2021
Treegive-away program
2022 or TBD
View corridors
2022 or TBD
Wildlife & habitat corridors
Q3 2021-Q4 2021
Expanded public education & Information
Q3 2021 — 2022 or TBD
Stormwater & watershed Analysis
Q4 2021-2022 or TBD
Other tree -related issues
2022 or TBD
Mr. Lien reviewed:
Tree Regulations on Private Property
o Goal 1 - Maintain or enhance citywide canopy coverage
The city has limited information about the condition of the urban forest. Success with this
objective will be achieved with enhanced management of public trees and a deeper
understanding of the population of trees on private property. The following actions will support
this objective:
A. Update tree regulations to reduce clearcutting or other development impacts on the urban
forest and to consider changes to tree replacement requirements and penalties for code
violations
o Goal 3 -Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private property
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 1, 2021
Page 16
Packet Pg. 427
8.3.a
To ensure success with enhancing the tree canopy, the city recognizes that voluntary public
participation must be encouraged. The following actions will support this objective.
Equity
o Edmonds is a varied city that has developed over many years.
o In some areas, large swaths of native trees have been cut — as part of intense urban development
o Elsewhere, many trees remain, due to limited incentives to remove them or perhaps the
landscape did not encourage their removal (e.g. steep slopes or stream corridors)
o Equity concerns should be considered
o A balancing of private property rights with public benefit should be considered
Options for Tree Retention on Private Property Not Related to Development
1. Require fee permit for removal of any significant tree (6 inch DBH)
2. Allow X number of trees on a given property to be removed over a period of time
3. Allow X number of trees less the 24 inch DBH to be removed over a period of time
4. Require paid permit for removal of more than the allowed number of trees and for removal of
24 inch DBH trees
5. Review retention requirements for all of the above, or only when permit is required?
6. Consider whether all residential properties should be required to have minimum number of
trees
Heritage Tree Program
o UFMP Goal LD Develop a voluntary heritage tree program
1. Completely voluntary program. Designated Heritage Tree to be removed from Heritage
Tree Program at owners desire
2. Property owner voluntarily designates Heritage Tree, but Heritage Tree must be protected
and only removed if hazard or nuisance
3. Anyone may nominate a Heritage Tree regardless of property owner's consent and
Heritage Tree must be protected
Views
o UFMP recognizes views, but does not include in specific goals related to view protection
o Public view corridors vs. private view protection
o City would be arbitrator between property owners
o State has strong protections regarding private property rights and city will have limited ability
to enforce restrictions on one property to protect the view afforded another
o Other considerations include critical areas
View Options
o Establish "view sheds" or "view areas"
a. Limit mature tree height to allowable zoning height
b. Require a "view corridor" over a percentage of the property line where trees could not be
planted
o Establish process where trees may be removed if they grow into a view in a "view area"
o If city pursues regulations regarding private views other factors need to be considered such as
critical areas
Habitat Corridors
o Largely protected by critical areas
o Education
■ Stormwater crews
■ Partner with organizations such as Stream Keepers and Students Saving Salmon
o Critical area Habitat and Species of Local importance
o Tree canopy assessment
Incentives
o Goals 3 — Incentivize protecting & planting trees on private property
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 1, 2021
Page 17
Packet Pg. 428
8.3.a
To ensure success with enhancing the tree canopy, the City recognizes that voluntary public
participation must be encouraged. The following actions will support this objective:
A. Have a program of giving away trees and/or tree vouchers for use in Edmonds
B. For properties that retain a certain amount of tree canopy cover, explore establishment of:
i. A property tax "rebate" applicable to the City portion of property taxes; and/or
ii. A stormwater utility fee reduction; and/or
iii. Other techniques that provide a financial recognition of the benefits of tree planting
and protection.
C. Develop a certification/awards program to publicly recognize property owners that
maintain a certain amount or type of healthy trees
Mr. Lien relayed staff was seeking direction from direction from Council on what they wanted to see in the
Stage 2 Tree Update related to the options for tree retention on private property not related to development:
Councilmember Buckshnis asked why it was necessary to charge any fees when the goal was to keep track
of trees being cut down. She asked why the City would want to require a fee permit for 6 inch tree. Mr.
Lien referred to the list of options on page 186 for tree retention on private property not related to
development. He was not recommending a fee, but that was one of the options for Council to consider.
With that option, if someone wanted to remove a tree, a permit could be required with a minimal fee.
Options 2 would not require fee permit but would require documentation. Property owners would be
allowed to remove X trees of any size per year; it would not require a permit or fee, but documentation
would need to be submitted so the City could track it and ensure they were not asking to remove more than
the number of trees they were allotted. Option 3 would allow property owners to remove X number of
smaller trees. Option 4 would require a permit to remove more than the allowed number of trees or removal
of 24" DBH trees. If permits are required for removal, even the 24" DBH trees, it will be necessary to
establish criteria; why would the City say no to removing those trees, are they allowed outright, is a permit
required to review a replanting plan, etc. Options 5 and 6 refer to retention requirements and a minimum
number of trees on the property. He summarized a fee permit for any tree removal is option as well as no
fee but documentation.
Councilmember Buckshnis preferred Options 1, 2 and 3. She recognized those will be labor intensive and
asked whether an analysis had been done regarding additional staff. Ms. Hope said the exact amount of
staffing depends on which option the Council selects. There would need to be an urban forester or arborist
position to oversee this as well as 1-2 additional staff or more if a more complex process was selected.
There are a lot of costs associated with tracking regardless of whether a fee is charged.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented on the unintended consequences she has witnessed with the
emergency ordinance regarding 24" landmark trees. Homeowners reporting their neighbors to the City for
cutting a big tree. She wanted citizens to feel comfortable that they could remove some trees and to
understand the environmental reasons for retaining trees. She preferred a no fee permit and only monitoring.
Ms. Hope recalled some Councilmembers were interested in staff talking with people who wanted to cut
trees and explaining their options. That is a great idea but will also require staff resources.
Council President Paine agreed with either free or low cost permitting for trees. She supported some type
of permitting process so the City can track what is happening with trees. Before adopting requirements, it
will be important to have the canopy assessment to provide a measurement. The Council can then determine
a canopy goal/target and how to reach that canopy. Education will be helpful to many homeowners. The
program will require resources include urban forestry staff, code enforcement, permit review, and staff who
to provide education.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 1, 2021
Page 18
Packet Pg. 429
8.3.a
Council President Paine asked if the Planning Board was seeking direction from the Council about a
Heritage Tree Program. Ms. Hope said the Planning Board was interested in direction from the Council
about a Heritage Tree Program. Mr. Lien said the Heritage Tree Program is separate from regulations for
tree retention on private property. The Heritage Tree Program would be a recognition type program, two
separate code updates. The Planning Board is seeking direction from Council regarding tree retention on
private property not related to development. He provided the six options to give Council something to
consider.
Councilmember Olson agreed with not requiring a fee. She recalled Bill Phipps referencing Kirkland's code
and what he like about it was there was no fee and the city took responsibility for planting elsewhere for
some of the trees being removed. There is greater incentive for a property owner to identify the trees they
want to remove and get counsel from the city arborist or other knowledgeable source regarding alternatives
to removing a tree. The time the Council has spent on the tree code has been very valuable and she thanked
staff and citizens for being patient with the time it takes to synthetize inputs and develop good policy. Some
of points that have resonated with her are the difficulty to enforce prohibitions, people who are determined
to take trees down and people who love trees and therefore bought property full of trees and end up being
penalized.
Councilmember Olson referred to the question raised during Audience Comments about why the City is
doing this. She said the environmental component was the driver, trees are an important part of carbon
sequestration and a component in climate change. Protecting the tree canopy not only helps with that but
also enhance the aesthetics. With regard to a Heritage Tree Program, she would support a site specific tree
program and if it is required in the UFMP, she would support a voluntary program. With regard to views,
she referred to vegetation used as a fence. The City legislates how high fences can be, and if someone uses
vegetation as a fence, it should not be allowed to be 20 feet tall and block their neighbor's light or view.
Mr. Lien said the City has regulated hedge height in the past, but that was removed from the code before
he came to the City 13 years go. Regulating hedge height requires the City to be arbitrator between
neighbors; one person wants the hedge for privacy and the other wants the hedge removed for view reasons.
Councilmember Olson commented the code could be clear if vegetation used as a fence blocked views, it
needed to comply with the fence height regulations. That did not mean a property owner could not have a
tree in that area, but they could not use a hedge as a fence.
Councilmember K. Johnson thanked Mr. Lien for taking a comprehensive look at the Tree Code Stage 2,
incorporating a range of options and asking the Council to narrow it down for the Planning Board. She was
unsure if that was what staff wanted or if the Planning Board wanted to continue to look at the range of
options. Ms. Hope said staff was not asking Council to eliminate any of the options tonight, but to determine
next steps for the Planning Board to begin that work. All the other items will come back to the Council in
the future.
Mr. Lien said the Planning Board was seeking clear direction from the Council regarding what direction to
go and what to look at. Tree retention on private property not related to development is the most difficult.
If the Council wants to pursue a Heritage Tree Program, that is pretty easy and there are a few options. With
regard to tree retention on private property, Council appeared to be interested in an option that did not
require a fee; tracking tree removal with no fee. Additional Council direction is needed regarding when a
permit is required, whether it is above X number of trees or is it not allowed and a property owner can only
remove two trees, or is it limited by size, etc. He asked when a permit would be required.
Councilmember K. Johnson agreed with moving the Heritage Tree Program to the Planning Board. She
was also interested in wildlife and habitat corridors, relaying her understanding that they were protected
under the critical area ordinance but there are large trees in parks and other areas so she encouraged the
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 1, 2021
Page 19
Packet Pg. 430
Planning Board to tackle that issue. Wildlife and habitat corridors are important for the tree canopy as well
as salmon recovery efforts.
Council President Paine agreed with having the Planning Board look at a Heritage Tree Program. She
supported a free or low cost tree permit for removal of any significant trees, and suggested having the
Planning Board consider Options 2 and 3 along with data from the canopy assessment. She also agreed with
looking at wildlife and habitat corridors.
Councilmember Distelhorst agreed with providing general direction to the Planning Board regarding
Options 2 and 3 and have them consider a no cost tracking permit. The clock is ticking on the emergency
ordinance so there is some pressure to ensure the 24" and larger trees are addressed via an update from the
Planning Board that will come to Council. He expressed support for Option 1 for a Heritage Tree Program.
He has seen how some of the more restrictive options such as Option 3 have been used with buildings where
people have applied for landmark status on something they do not own and have no interest in and how that
has been weaponized.
Councilmember Buckshnis agreed with a Heritage Tree Program. She recalled the Floretum Garden Club
and the Tree Board had discussed that and Councilmember Olson provided an example of program that did
not need to be codified. She supported doing districting or establishing view/no view areas in the UFMP.
Edmonds' real estate market is flourishing and houses with trees are priced differently than houses with
views. She was not sure how to diplomatically address view versus no view in the code. She agreed with
focusing on wildlife and habitat corridors, no net loss and net ecological gain. A lot of it is related to critical
areas but there are also wildlife corridors in non -critical areas. With regard to incentives, she was concerned
with opened up a ball of wax, especially related to stormwater issues. She summarized habitat, permitting
and view corridors were her top three.
Councilmember L. Johnson recommended approaching this as a shared responsibility; the overwhelming
responsibility should not be on one subset of the community or homeowners over another. She agreed with
Options 2 and 3 for tree retention on private property not related to development, noting the canopy
assessment will guide that. The canopy assessment will also guide Option 6, whether all residential property
should be required to have a minimum number of trees. Without the information provided by the canopy
assessment, it is difficult to decide.
With regard to a Heritage Tree Program, Councilmember L. Johnson supported Options 1 or 2 related to a
voluntary program. With regard to view corridors, this is related to the equity issue and providing a balance.
A number of properties have already been cleared, is it fair to put the burden on those who have not yet
removed trees? It will be a delicate balance and will depend on the canopy assessment. She questioned what
constitutes a view corridor, observing there are a lot of different views. She referred to comment related to
light and asked whether access to light was prioritized for someone living in a view corridor but not for
other homeowners which she felt was an inequity issue. The City does not want to be in the business of
defining and regulating views and should leave that up to homeowners to do amongst themselves. With
regard to wildlife and habitat corridors, she cited the importance of education and incentives. She supported
certification for wildlife and habitat corridors similar to a Heritage Tree Program. She was not sold on
incentives but neither did she want to rule them out. She would support incentives that were easier to do
and did not require as much staff time to monitor.
Councilmember Fraley-Monillas said she was not prepared to provide her arguments for and against options
tonight. She misunderstood what the Council was doing with this agenda item and will not be stating her
preferences but is listening to everyone else and has a good understanding of their priorities.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 1, 2021
Page 20
Packet Pg. 431
8.3.a
With regard to the issue of light, Councilmember Olson agreed that related to equity; it could arise anywhere
and was not exclusive to the bowl. Blocking light can be an issue for someone's garden. She strongly
favored incentives, agreeing they were complicated to figure out but that was the way to go. The
environment is important, and instead of spending money on enforcement and punishment, she preferred
to provide incentives for having the right tree in the right place. She felt the City could get better results
with incentives rather than punishments.
Mr. Lien said he did not assume the Council would complete this tonight; it was intended to provide some
guidance. The Council has provided clear direction on the Heritage Tree Program. The direction regarding
tree retention on private property not related to development seemed to be no permit but tracking for the
removal of a certain number of trees. He will come back to Council to discuss views and habitat corridors
in more depth so Council can provide clearer direction. Council agreed. Mr. Lien referenced comments
regarding light, noting some jurisdictions have regulations related to solar access..
Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. He relayed Council President Paine and he conferred during the
recess and decided Item 8.5 would be postponed to a future meeting.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER DISTELHORST,
TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 10:15 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
4. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO
CHAPTER 17.75 ECDC, ENTITLED "OUTDOOR DINING," AND A RELATED SECTION
IN CHAPTER 17.70 ECDC
Development Services Director Shane Hope advised this is not about outdoor dining on sidewalks or streets.
Planning Manager Rob Chave advised this is a Planning Board recommendation on an interim ordinance
Council adopted at the end of December related to outdoor dining. Although the ordinance was listed, it
was not included in packet. He displayed the one -page ordinance and explained on private property, dining
is allowed as an outdoor use. Until the interim ordinance, an additional 10% of the indoor seating was
allowed as outdoor seating or 12 seats whichever was greater and beyond those limits a Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) was required. He commented 10% of the interior seating or 12 seats was not very much and
especially during COVID, it came to the City's attention that restaurants needed more flexibility. A CUP
goes to the Hearing Examiner and costs thousands of dollars and takes up to three months for approval,
making any significant outdoor dining cost and time prohibitive for a typical restaurant/small business.
Mr. Chave explained the interim ordinance adopted by Council removed the requirement for a CUP,
clarified the need for a building permit for any structures, and for retaining any ADA accessible parking
spaces. The original code did not have a limitation on the amount of outdoor dining; the interim ordinance
had a limit up to 50% of the existing interior seating and up to 30 seats. The interim ordinance was more
generous than what was allowed without a permit, but not as open ended as the original code. The Planning
Board held a public hearing and recommended making the interim ordinance permanent. A public hearing
at City Council is scheduled on June 15t''
Councilmember Buckshnis asked how 30 seats versus 40 or 20 was decided when the original was 12. Mr.
Chave it was 12 or 10% of the indoor seating whichever was more. Thirty seats seemed like a reasonable
number, it could be lower or higher. The 50% was not a magic number but it clearly indicates that outdoor
dining was to be a secondary part of the overall operation, not the main part. Under the interim code, the
additional outdoor dining could be 50% of the interior or 30 seats. For example, a small takeout place with
just a kitchen and no interior seating could have 30 outdoor seats.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
June 1, 2021
Page 21
Packet Pg. 432
8.3.b
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Steve W stated that there has been little or no discussion on the negative effects that some trees have on active
or passive solar access. Is there any intention to do so?
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Joint Work Session with Tree Board on Tree Code Update (AMD2022-00004)
Urban Forest Planner Deb Powers made a PowerPoint presentation regarding Property Owner Tree Removals.
Under the current code, in most cases on developed single-family lots with no critical areas, it's basically
unlimited tree removals. This code amendment is addressing that situation.
Key concepts for consideration with this code update:
• Number of removals
• Frequency
• Additional trees that can be removed (exceptions)
• Landmark trees
• Tree removal in critical areas
• Replacement requirements
Number of removals: Ms. Powers reviewed that at the April 26 meeting the Planning Board was supportive of
allowing a certain number of trees to be removed under a notification process. There had been some question
about whether it should depend on the property size and/or what frequency the removals would be allowed. She
reviewed some sample code language. Another question was related to the size of the trees. The Planning Board
had proposed that only trees 12" to 23.9" DBH would be "regulated" under the allowance. "Landmark" trees
would be 24" DBH or greater.
Frequency: Is 12 months between allowed tree removals appropriate? The Planning Board had thought that it
would depend on the size and number of trees.
Additional trees that can be removed: Are hazardous and nuisance trees reasonable exceptions to the number of
allowances? These would be allowed to be removed in addition to whatever the allowance is.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
June 28, 2023
Page 2 of 8
Packet Pg. 433
8.3.b
Landmark tree removals: Should "Landmark" tree removals be regulated in the same manner as smaller trees?
Fewer number of allowed removals? Greater number of months between removals? The Planning Board had
indicated that Landmark tree removals (24"+ DBH) should be more limited than smaller trees. Ms. Powers
reviewed some sample potential numbers with different allowances for different property sizes.
Planning Board Member Mitchell wondered about having different standards for different neighborhoods rather
than a one -size -fits -all approach in order to retain characteristics of specific neighborhoods. For example, he
noted that the existing tree density in Westgate is way less than Perrinville. Ms. Powers acknowledged that this
could raise equity concerns. She noted that they could made the code as complex or as simple as desired, but
with greater code complexity there is usually less code compliance. Additionally, staff does not have the
resources to deal with administering a complex code.
Planning Board Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell recommended not overcomplicating the process. She agreed that
there are areas where there is a much greater canopy loss but having the same regulations across the city will be
easier for everyone to understand. She said she liked the way the chart shared by Ms. Powers was set up even
though she would be in favor of having two trees be the starting point for regulated tree removal allowances per
12 months rather than three trees.
Critical areas: Should the same tree removal allowances apply in critical areas? The Planning Board had
previously suggested only hazard and nuisance trees should be allowed to be removed in critical areas. A permit
would be required to review whether the trees fit that criterion. Ms. Powers explained that the number one code
enforcement issue they are having right now is unauthorized tree removals in critical areas.
Replacement requirements: Should replacement trees be required for property owner tree removals? The
response at the previous meeting was that it depends on the size and number of trees removed. Ms. Powers
noted that no replanting is occurring with the current unlimited tree removals and reviewed a proposed matrix
showing the removed tree DBH and the required number of replacements.
Planning Board Member Maxwell asked the Tree Board their thoughts about regulating tree removals on private
property. Tree Board Chair Cass explained that they are all passionate about trees and maintaining the tree
canopy but they had mixed opinions about how to go about it. She referred back to a heated 2015 Planning
Board public hearing about this topic. The decision then was to make sure there was an Urban Forest
Management Plan which should extend at least 20 years out with good goals. She noted there is now a Plan
with a good set of goals they haven't done and yet they are jumping to this action which wasn't necessarily in
the Plan. She thinks it would be hard to re-engage with the public when they asked for an Urban Forest
Management Plan with specific goals. She added that she noticed the consultant's report on the most recent
public outreach related to the current code updates didn't go back to 2015 or include all the public input that
went into the management plan.
Tree Board Vice Chair Phipps commented that he feels they should allow more trees to be removed on larger -
sized properties.
Tree Board Member Kliment expressed support for not allowing any tree removals in critical areas unless they
are hazardous trees. She liked the simplicity of the proposed plan. She is concerned about compliance and
whether or not they will lose more trees simply because of the fact that there is a tree code. A lot of people have
made it clear they don't want a tree code.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
June 28, 2023
Page 3 of 8
Packet Pg. 434
8.3.b
Planning Board Member Mitchell asked the Tree Board if the Urban Forest Management Plan aligns with the
existing tree code. Tree Board Chair Cass stated that the first goal was to maintain or enhance canopy coverage
but there was a whole bunch of sub goals that were supposed to be encouraged. There was also supposed to be
some tracking and reassessment after ten years. Planning Board Member Mitchell commented that it seems that
there needs to be a regulatory framework aligned with the Urban Forest Management Plan. Tree Board Chair
Cass agreed and said she thought that the control of tree removal on private property did not meet the goals of
the Urban Forest Management Plan. Tree Board Member Kliment said there is a statement in the Urban Forest
Management Plan that says that the Edmonds population did not want any sort of control of tree removal on
private property. Even in the current outreach done by the consultant, the number of people that responded is
minimal and 19% of them did not even live in Edmonds.
Planning Board Member Mitchell wondered about goal number 3 with more of an incentivized approach to
protecting and planting trees. Tree Board Member Kliment said she was very supportive of an educational
approach. Critical areas are something that they really need to pay attention to and have some sort of regulations
around those because of landslides.
Planning Board Member Martini asked about focusing on critical areas where environmental impacts would be
greatest. Tree Board Member Kliment replied that the Tree Board's idea was to have a computer at the fall
market booth where residents can type in their address to see whether their property is in a critical area and get
information about what that means. She noted that what people in critical areas do with their trees has an impact
on their neighbors.
Planning Manager Levitan acknowledged that the public outreach they have done with this current work is not
statistically significant but said he would say the same for the 2015 comments at the public hearing. Tree Board
Chair Cass said she heard there were close to 300 people in the chambers for that meeting. Planning Manager
Levitan said he didn't see the video but based on the minutes there were 15-20 people who provided oral
testimony.
Planning Board Chair Gladstone asked Ms. Powers what has been undertaken to implement the existing Urban
Forest Management Plan from 2019. She also wondered what triggered the notion of having a code that may
not have been consistent with the Urban Forest Management Plan. Ms. Powers explained there are quite a few
goals in the Urban Forest Management Plan that have been achieved already. In 2024 there will be a gap analysis
of the goals and consideration of the barriers to achieving the goals. She noted that the Urban Forest
Management Plan goals are not just for the City to implement but for citizens, volunteer groups, the Tree Board,
etc. She noted that Goal 1A related to development was achieved in 2021. At that point in time there was
direction given to look at private property tree removal. Council was concerned that there was no accounting
for or tracking of trees that were removed and no requirements for replanting. Planning Board Chair Gladstone
asked about the percentage of canopy cover that is on private property. Tree Board Vice Chair Phipps replied
that it was 87% - the vast majority of trees in Edmonds are on private property that has already been developed.
Tree Board Chair Cass later added that 58% of the city's tree canopy is on single-family residential land.
PLANNING BOARD VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL MOVED TO REMOVE THE OPTION
OF DOING NOTHING FROM THE TABLE AND THAT PROPERTY OWNER TREE REMOVALS
SHOULD BE RESTRICTED IN SOME MANNER TO BE RECOMMENDED FURTHER ON IN
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
June 28, 2023
Page 4 of 8
Packet Pg. 435
8.3.b
THIS DISCUSSION. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY PLANNING BOARD MEMBER
KUEHN.
Planning Manager Levitan noted that this was a work session and not the traditional time to make a motion.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell said her goal was to spend time on the analysis and not discussing whether or not
they should do the analysis because she feels like that has already been determined.
Planning Board Member Maxwell commented that there seems to be general agreement by the group that they
would want to restrict tree removals in critical areas. He noted he is sympathetic to Edmonds residents who are
concerned about taking away the ability to cut down trees on their own property given that they don't have a
canopy problem.
Planning Board Member Mitchell asked when the tree canopy would become a problem. Planning Board
Member Maxwell replied that the canopy is growing and not shrinking. It may not be growing as fast as they
would like but it is not shrinking. He noted that some of the documents indicated that there are concerns but
those are about developers and newcomers. In general, Edmonds residents seem to value their trees and do not
cut them down.
Planning Board Chair Gladstone said it is very difficult to determine at what point they are going to act. She
believes they are at a point where the canopy is important for so many things including affecting the urban
temperature. She doesn't want to wait until there is a reduction in the tree canopy and a problem; she wants to
retain it the way it is. She also wants to do it in an equitable way, understanding that there is a tension between
private property ownership and communal good. She thinks they can come to some reasonable compromises in
navigating that tension. It may not necessarily be what's recommended in the Urban Forest Management Plan,
but it may complement it. She also recommended keeping it as simple as possible.
Planning Board Member Kuehn agreed that simple is good. He also supported the motion. He acknowledged
there may not be a problem right now with the tree canopy, but their job is to plan for the future before there is
a problem. Playing catchup with something like this is a losing battle. He noted that having a nice big tree
canopy is important for helping with climate change.
MOTION PASSED 4-2.
Planning Board Chair Gladstone urged the group to keep the code simple because the simpler it is, the less there
is to argue about. Recognizing the strong tension between private property and tree protection and canopy
protection she thinks they need to figure out the best way to navigate that and get something reasonable and
workable to Council.
Ms. Powers suggested that there seems to be a basic agreement that critical areas need to be protected. The next
most basic form of regulations would be a simple allowance (a certain number of trees per year with notification)
not based on property size. At this simplest level, landmark tree removal would not be distinguished. Nuisance
and hazard trees would be over and above that numbers and would be subject to review to make sure they meet
the criteria. There was some discussion about how this would be counted and documented.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
June 28, 2023
Page 5 of 8
Packet Pg. 436
8.3.b
Tree Board Chair Cass asked if they could consider rolling over allowed trees to future years to be more cost
effective for property owners. Ms. Powers explained that in Kirkland that was considered "borrowing" from
future tree removals. It was hotly debated and there were questions as to whether it was effectively and fairly
slowing the loss of canopy. It also complicates tracking tree removals.
Tree Board Member Fagerstrom commented that ultimately the Council will decide this following a public
hearing and there will probably be a lot of public comments. He asked if the Planning Board had discussed tree
replacement or fee -in -lieu requirements. He noted that he is in favor of tree replacement but the current standards
are almost a joke because they don't replicate the environmental benefit from the trees that were removed. He
wants to maintain people's private property rights but he also wants to do what they can to maintain if not
increase the tree canopy to help protect the environment.
Planning Board Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell said she was generally in favor of tree replacements but agreed
that the current standards are highly inequitable in terms of trying to make sure that they are trying to replace
the same volume of impacted tree canopy. She would not be in favor of requiring homeowners to do
replacements or fees -in -lieu because it would just add more negativity to the situation. It might be worthwhile
to consider the outright allowance only for 12-24" DBH trees. If they want to remove larger trees, they could
require a permit and replacements. She stated that she was opposed to allowing fees in lieu in any circumstance.
Planning Board Member Mitchell asked about using a green factor metric to alleviate the controversies between
how many trees they could remove and replace. He commented that some jurisdictions are doing this to simplify
the issue. Ms. Powers agreed that this was a wonderful method, but it is also a much more complex level of
code for both the property owner and for staff.
Planning Board Member Maxwell commented that the chart showing the number of trees that could be removed
at one time (depending on property size) is more complicated than it has to be and doesn't make sense to him.
He wondered why it wasn't a simple formula like 1 tree per 3000 square feet. Ms. Powers explained this was
similar to the breakdowns in other jurisdictions but it sounds like the left side. (property size) is dropping off
anyway in favor of a simplified number of trees. Planning Board Member Maxwell said it should change with
the size of the lot.
Tree Board Vice Chair Phipps agreed that it should be graduated. He didn't think that was too complex. He also
thinks that landmark trees should get special consideration because they are very large trees and hold in
tremendous amounts of carbon. When you remove those there needs to be replacement trees.
Planning Board Member Kuehn said he agreed that landmark trees should be treated differently because of what
it would take to replace those. He thought the proposed chart was pretty simple if you can read a table.
Planning Board Chair Gladstone commented that breaking it up by property size is an equity issue because it is
a privilege to have a larger piece of land and be able to remove more trees. She wrestles with this because she
also recognizes that it is a bigger lot with maybe more trees. She would be interested in discussing this more at
a future meeting. She also wondered why staff chose three trees per year instead of the "two -per" trees concept
that Kirkland used.
Tree Board members departed.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
June 28, 2023
Page 6 of 8
Packet Pg. 437