Loading...
REVIEWED-BLD2023-0183+Structural_Calculations+2.13.2023_4.27.08_PM+33674891 of 23 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER L120 ENGINEERING & DESIGN 13150 91s' PL NE KIRKLAND, WA 98034-5901 LONGITUDE ONE TWENTYO ENGINEERING & DESIGN Calculation Package for Foundation Llft 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020 no: 5221006-3XR December^ 8th 2022 Prepared for: R&R Foundation Specialist 3409 McDougall Ave, suite 204 Everett, WA 98201 P: 425.760.5077 CONTACT: MANS THURFJELL, PE EMAIL: MTHURFJELL@L120ENGINEERING.COM PHONE: (425) 636-3313 DECK SLAB WALKWAY (E) RESIDENCE 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020. AREA OFR---- - --------------------------- "�"'">"• IWORIKR ALL LessTnexxa tau PILE O.C. 1M CORNER GAG L SLAB ATEP,BE WALKWAY FAOm COhNER (4) PILES @ B'-0" O.C. MAX !-----------------------21-0----------------------_U. d...,.D..— sU. aQ s� ¢z U. PARCEL NO. 00496000000300 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAURELHURST PARK BILK 000 D-00 - LOT 3 00210 OWNER NAME & ADDRESS SMITH CYRUS B 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020. LOT SIZE 0.28 (12, 196 SQFT) BUILDING LOT COVERAGE 18.1 % (2,204 SOFT) GARAGE PILE SPACING & LOAD REQUIRMENTS TABLE MAX O.C. SPACING, ft MIN VERTICAL CAPACITY, kips PROOF TESTING LOADkips PILE A PILE TYPE BTWN END PILES OFFSET ALLOWABLE LOADING 200% MIN VERTICAL CAPACffY (MIN ULTIMATE CAPAC LOCATION #1 HELICAL 6-0" T-T MAX 13.0 kip26.0 ki TYP #2-5 HELICAL 6'-T T-0" MAX 12.0 ki 24.0 ki TYP NOTES: a. MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM INSTALLATION TORQUE FOR HELICAL ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY THE PILE MANUFACTURER. THE MINIMUM INSTALLATION TORQUE SHALL BE HIGH ENOUGH TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED BEARING CAPACITY LOADING, INCLUDING A SAFETY FACTOR NO LESS THAN 2. THE MAXIMUM INSTALLATION TORQUE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE TORSIONAL CAPACITY OF THE PILE SHAFTS OR ANY PART OF THE PILE ASSEMBLY. MAXIMUM INSTALLATION TORQUE RATING OF 8,300FT-LBS FORA 2-7I8 INCH DIAMETER HELICAL PILE WITH 0.203 INCH SHAFT WALL THICKNESS PER ESR3750. b. HELICAL ASSEMBLIES AS MANUFACTURED BY IDEAL MANUFACTURING, INC., IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESR-3750. c. PILE OR ANCHOR LOADS NOT TO EXCEED MAXIMUM CAPACITY AS DETERMINED BY THE MANUFACTURER FOR ANY PART OF THE ASSEMBLY. d. MAXIMUM ONCENTERSPACING LISTED FOR TYPICAL PILE INSTALLATION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON PLAN. NOTE: THE PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN CHANGING OF SITE TOPOGRAPHY OR EXISTING DEVELOPED AREAS. PUGET DR --------------- ooaco3 EIR. SITE PUGETWAY L N ® — OVERATL PARCEL PLAN N.T.S. SITE PLAN LEGEND ❑ EXISTING RESIDENCE STRUCTURE EXISTING ADJACENT STRUCTURE AREA OF PROPOSED WORK PROPERTY LINE ---- APPROXIMATE DIMENSION HELICAL PILE 1. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE. 2. FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF CONCRETE STE WALLPER R&R LEVEL SURVEY. 3. REFERTOTHEFOLLOWING DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HFUGAL PILES ...................................... 1 ISD-1.1 REFER4. TO STRUCTURAL CALCU-CWS PACKAGEDATED OCT 28, 2D2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, SPECIFICATIONS, AND REQUIREMENTS. 5. LEVEL SURVEY PER R&R REPAIRPLAN DATED AUG 25, 2022 REFER TO STRUCTUNAL CALCULATIONS PACKAGE FOR MODIFICATIONS AND ADDITI REQUIREMENTS FOR REPAIR PLAN. hICGY�-l.F�Fi�J]Z]:i0VCl91AyP:i�T EQUIVALENT) AT A MAXIMUM SPACING 18"00. ANCHORS TO BE CENTERED ON OR INSTALLED ABOVE THE CENTER LINE OF THE CHANNEL. 10. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING STEM WALLS AT AND BETWEEN PILE ATTACHMENT LOCATIONS ARE S-THICK MINIMUM WITH 2'-B' HEIGHT (MEASURED FROM EDTG TO T/CONC) MINIMUM. FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB -ON -GRADE AT PILE ATTACHMENT IS 4" THICK MINIMUM. 11. PARCEL DIMENSIONS PROVIDED BY CITY OF KING ISLAND. NOT TO SCALE. PROPERTY LINE AND RESIDENCE LOCATING DIMENSIONS (WITH ASTERISK,.) APPROXIMATED PER SNOHOMISH COUNTY iMAP AND SEATTLE DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTIONS GIS MAPPING TOOLS. NOT TO BE USED FOR LEGAL PURPOSES. 12. SITE FEATURES AND EXISTING STRUCTURES ON ADJACENT PARCELS NOT 14. PILES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO A MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF 5'0' OR UNTIL TORQUING OF THE PILE SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL A HYDRAULIC PRESSURE IS ACHIEVED TO PROVIDE THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM VERTICAL CAPACITY WITH A SAFETY FACTOR OF NO LESS THAN TWO. ADVANCEMENT SHALL BE HALTED IMMEDIATELY IF THE STRUCTURE BEGINS TO EXPERIENCE UPLIFT FLEXURE. LOQATE 1� 1' zr_• x 0 O.C. MAX FROM CORNER -• ". LOCATE PILE O.C. MAX FROM CORNER (4) PILES @ 6 0 06 0C MI R&R LEVEL SURVEY SEE STRUCTURAL CALCULATION PACKAGE FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS SITE PLAN 3of23 LONGITUDE ONE TWENTY ENGINEERING & DESIGN Scone/Obiective PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. S221006-3XR PROJECT 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020. SUBJECT Foundation Stabilization/Jackin BY NJ DATE 12/8/22 To determine the required pile spacing and geometry to stabilize and lift (where required) the existing structural foundation. These findings have been based upon the calculated strength of the existing foundation system and the current vertical loading from the existing structure above (based on as -built assessments). The R&R Foundation Specialists' (R&R) proposed pile layout can be found in the following pages with structural recommendations based upon the findings of L120 Engineering & Design. Note that cosmetic damages to rigid wall coverings/members and siding are expected during a foundation lift. Such cosmetic damages/cracks are to be repaired by others following the completion of the foundation stabilization and lifting and are not included in the structural scope presented here. It should be further noted that L120's scope is limited to the perimeter support systems/continuous footings. The interior crawl -space support system for the first floor shall be installed per R&R. This could include the use of some or all of the following: longer support posts, adjustable post -base hardware, and/or the addition of taller wood support members. Settlement in these interior support areas shall be monitored and further adjustments shall be made if necessary. Structural Summary: - The foundation of the residence consists of continuous cast -in -place concrete stem wall and concrete strip footings. Below the footings, piles are to be spaced at a distance no larger than 6'-0" on -center at the locations indicated on the attached Level Survey. Reference SSK-01. - End piles are to be placed as close to corners as possible and shall not exceed a max corner offset distance of T-0". - A maximum allowable loading of 2,150 plf was utilized in this analysis. This was determined through inspection of building geometry and conservative span/tributary loading assumptions based on standard construction practices - The following load values represent the maximum expected pile loads for the indicated spacing. R&R to provide pile and equipment assemblies with capacities equal to or greater than the indicated load values. Allowable Load Capacity Requirement: Exterior/Perimeter Piles 1 @ 6'-0" o.c. ............ 13 kip minimum vertical capacity (allowable load) Exterior/Perimeter Piles 2-5 @ 6'-0" o.c. ............ 12 kip minimum vertical capacity (allowable load) Note: Refer to the attached General Notes for additional requirements. - As determined by R&R, the site appears to have no lateral (horizontal) displacements or concerns. As such, the analysis and recommendations presented in this report have been strictly limited to vertical stabilization/jacking. If lateral movement is observed or expected additional structural analysis will be required. - Structural recommendations contained in this package are based on site photographs dated August 25, 2022, provided by R&R. To the knowledge of L120, a geotechnical investigation was not performed on this site. Consequently, all structural recommendations assume adequate soil conditions to obtain the required pile capacities. Please inform L120 of site -specific conditions that were unconsidered by, may conflict with, or otherwise compromise the recommendations contained within this package, including, but not limited to, water drainage, slope stability, existing structural damage, or existing subsurface obstructions. In this instance, the structural assumptions, recommendations, and scope for this project will need to be revisited to consider and address the new findings Refer to the following pages for pile and connection specifications. L120 ENGINEERING & DESIGN 4 of 23 GENERAL NOTES HELICAL PILES 1. HELICAL PILES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC). 2. HELICAL PILES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND MANUFACTURED BY IDEAL MANUFACTURING, INC., AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESR-3750. 3. ALL MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF HELICAL PILE COMPONENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ESR-3750. 4. CORROSION PROTECTION OF ALL PILE COMPONENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ICC-ES ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR CORROSION PROTECTION OF STEEL FOUNDATION SYSTEMS USING POLYMER (EAA) COATINGS (AC228). 5. ALL HELICAL FOUNDATION COMPONENTS SHALL BE GALVANICALLY ISOLATED FROM CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL, BUILDING STRUCTURAL STEEL, OR ANY OTHER METAL BUILDING COMPONENTS PER AC358 SECTION 3.9. 6. THE SHAFT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND FABRICATED TO SUPPORT THE SPECIFIED DESIGN LOADS. 7. ONLY MANUFACTURER -APPROVED CONNECTORS, ADAPTORS, AND ACCESSORIES MAY BE USED. 8. HELICAL PILES SHALL BE INSTALLED VERTICALLY INTO THE GROUND WITH AN ALLOWABLE ANGLE OF INCLINATION OF +/- 1 DEGREE FROM VERTICAL PER SECTION 4.2.1 OF ESR-3750. 9. MONITOR AND RECORD DEPTH OF PILE PENETRATION. PROVIDE TORQUE MONITORING DEVICE AS PART OF THE INSTALLING UNIT. MONITOR AND RECORD TORQUE APPLIED DURING THE INSTALLATION OF EACH PILE AT SPECIFIC DEPTHS. 10. HELICAL PILES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO THE MINIMUM TORQUE VALUE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LOAD CAPACITIES INDICATED ON PLAN INCLUDING A FACTOR OF SAFETY NO LESS THAN TWO (2). THE MAXIMUM INSTALLATION TORQUE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE TORSIONAL CAPACITY OF ANY INDIVIDUAL COMPONENT OF THE PILE ASSEMBLY. 11. ALL BRACKETS AND HELICAL PILE ASSEMBLY COMPONENTS SHALL HAVE ADEQUATE CAPACITY TO ACHIEVE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BEARING CAPACITY INCLUDING A FACTOR OF SAFETY NO LESS THAN TWO (2). 12. REPAIR BRACKETS MUST BE CONCENTRICALLY LOADED AND THE BRACKET PLATE MUST BE FULLY ENGAGED WITH BOTTOM OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. 13. ALL HELICAL PILE ASSEMBLY COMPONENTS MUST HAVE ADEQUATE STRENGTH TO DEVELOP THE TORQUE REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION AND ALL INDUCED STRESSES. 14. THE PILE QUANTITY, LAYOUT, AND SPACING INDICATED ON PLAN SHALL NOT BE CHANGED WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER -OF -RECORD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 15. CONTINUOUS SPECIAL INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2O18 AND 2012 IBC SECTION 1705.9 MUST BE PROVIDED FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE HELICAL PILES AND FOUNDATION BRACKETS. ITEMS TO BE RECORDED AND CONFIRMED BY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR MUST INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: A. PRODUCT MANUFACTURER B. MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFICATION OF THE INSTALLERS C. PRODUCT TYPE AND CONFIGURATIONS FOR HELICAL PILE LEAD SHAFT SECTIONS, EXTENSIONS, BRACKETS, BOLTS, THREADED RODS, NUTS, WASHERS, AND TORQUES AS SPECIFIED IN THIS REPORT AND THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS D. INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR THE HELICAL PILE SHAFT, INSTALLATION EQUIPMENT USED, AND THE IDEAL FOUNDATION SYSTEMS INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS E. ANTICIPATED AND ACTUAL PILING DEPTH F. REQUIRED TARGET INSTALLATION TORQUE OF PILES AND MINIMUM DEPTH OF INSTALLATION G. INCLINATION AND POSITION OF PILES, TOP OF PILE EXTENSION IN FULL CONTACT WITH BRACKET, TIGHTNESS OF ALL BOLTS AND EVIDENCE THAT THE PILE FOUNDATION SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED BY AN APPROVED IDEAL FOUNDATION SYSTEMS INSTALLER. 16. PILES IMPROPERLY INSTALLED BECAUSE OF MISLOCATION, MISALIGNMENT, OR FAILURE TO MEET OTHER SPECIFIED DESIGN/INSTALLATION CRITERIA ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. ABANDON REJECTED PILES AND INSTALL ADDITIONAL PILES AS REQUIRED. HELICAL PILE PROOF TESTING THE CAPACITY OF THE INSTALLED PILES SHALL BE VERIFIED BY FIELD TESTING OF A MINIMUM THREE (3) PERCENT OF PILES UP TO FIVE (5) PILES MAXIMUM (ONE (1) MINIMUM) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROCEDURE OUTLINED IN ASTM D1143 AND/OR THE 2018 SEATTLE BUILDING CODE (SBC). THE MAXIMUM TEST LOAD SHALL BE TWO -HUNDRED (200) PERCENT OF THE SPECIFIED DESIGN LOAD. 5 of 23 GENERAL NOTES STRUCTURAL STEEL 1. REFERENCE STANDARDS: DESIGN, FABRICATION AND ERECTION ARE TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AISC "CODE OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR STEEL BUILDINGS AND BRIDGES". 2. MATERIALS: BOLTS - ASTM A307, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL OTHER STEEL - ASTM A36 (Fy = 36,000 PSI) 3. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED WELDERS AND CONFORM TO AWS CODES D1.1 AND D1.3. WELDS NOT SPECIFIED ARE TO BE 1/4" CONTINUOUS FILLET MINIMUM. USE DRY E70 ELECTRODES. WHERE ON -SITE WELDING IS REQUIRED, SPECIAL INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2O18 AND 2012 IBC SECTION 1705.2 IS ALSO REQUIRED. CONCRETE 1. REFERENCE STANDARDS: ACI 301, ACI 318, IBC. 2. MINIMUM CONCRETE STRENGTH (28 DAYS): FOOTINGS AND STEM WALLS..................................................3,000 PSI - 5 SACK MIX BASEMENT FOUNDATION RETAINING WALLS .......................3,000 PSI - 5 SACK MIX SLAB-ON-GRADE........................................................................2,500 PSI - 5 SACK MIX SLAB -ON -GRADE... EXPOSED WEATHERING SURFACES ...... 3,000 PSI AIR -ENTRAINMENT 2.5% TO 5.5% FOR EXPOSED CONCRETE 3. MIXING: COMPLY WITH ACI 301. DO NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF WATER SPECIFIED IN THE APPROVED MIX. PROPORTIONS OF AGGREGATE TO CEMENT SHALL BE SUCH AS TO PRODUCE A DENSE, WORKABLE MIX WHICH CAN BE PLACED WITHOUT SEGREGATION OR EXCESS FREE SURFACE WATER. 4. PLACING: COMPLY WITH ACI 301. PROVIDE A 3/4 INCH CHAMFER AT ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE EDGES, UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. 5. SLUMP: 4 INCHES PLUS OR MINUS 1 INCH. DO NOT ADD WATER TO MIX TO INCREASE SLUMP. GREATER SLUMP, ACCELERATED SET, OR HIGH EARLY STRENGTH MAY BE ACHIEVED BY USING APPROVED ADMIXTURES. 6. CURING: COMPLY WITH ACI 301. KEEP CONCRETE MOIST FOR SEVEN DAYS MINIMUM. 7. JOINTING: PROVIDE ADEQUATE JOINTING TO MINIMIZE EFFECTS OF VOLUME CHANGE. JOINTS SHOWN MAY BE ADJUSTED AT CONTRACTOR'S OPTION WITH PRIOR APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER. 8. WEATHER EXTREMES: COMPLY WITH ACI 305R FOR HOT WEATHER. COMPLY WITH ACI-306R FOR COLD WEATHER. 9. WATER/CEMENT RATIO SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.50 (BY WEIGHT), TYPICAL. 10. ALL SPECIFIED CONCRETE ANCHORS SHALL BE SIMPSON STRONG -TIE, HILTI, OR EQUIVALENT. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED. ANCHORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINIMUM EMBEDMENT, SPACING, EDGE DISTANCE, AND REQUIREMENTS PER MANUFACTURER. 6 of 23 PROJECT LONGITUDE SUBJECT ONE TWENTYO ENGINEERING & DESIGN BY NJ PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. S221006-3XR 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020. Foundation Stabilization/Jacking DATE 12/8/22 ideal Foundation Systems2-718"O Helical Pile ]0.203-inch wall thickness) - Soil Capacity per ESR-3750 DIGGA6KDrive Head Pressure Torque CorrelQtionFactor, Kt Ultimate Axial Compressive Allowable Axial Compressive L120 ENGINEERING &DESIGN 7 of 23 LONGITUDE ONE TWENTYO ENGINEERING & DESIGN PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. S221006-3XR PROJECT 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020. SUBJECT Ideal Helical Pile Installation Chart BY NJ DATE 12/8/22 Ideal Foundation Systems 2-7/8"0 * Helical Pile (0.203-inch wall thickness) -Soil Capacity per ESR-3750 DIGGA lOK Drive Head Pressure (Psi) Torque, T (ft*Ibs) Torque Correlation Factor, Kt [Compression] (ft i) Ultimate Axial Compressive Capacity, P„ = K,*T (kips) Allowable Axial Compressive Capacity, Pa = 0.5*P„ (kips) 500 1,740 9 15.7 7.8 600 2,088 9 18.8 9.4 700 2,436 9 21.9 11.0 800 2,784 9 25.1 12.5 900 3,132 9 28.2 14.1 1000 3,480 9 31.3 15.7 1100 3,828 9 34.5 17.2 1200 4,176 9 37.6 18.8 1300 4,524 9 40.7 20.4 1400 4,872 9 43.8 21.9 1500 5,220 9 47.0 23.5 1600 5,568 9 50.1 25.1 1700 5,916 9 53.2 26.6 1800 6,264 9 56.4 28.2 1900 6,612 9 59.5 29.8 L120 ENGINEERING &DESIGN 9of23 Thursday, August 25, 2022 jvLi PHOTOS Crew will be installing helical pile #1 along the West side of home's foundation, crew will be excavating 2x2 area's in locations where piles will be placed. Crew will lay plastic down for all excavated soils and debris. Homeowner may trim landscaping back in specified areas, otherwise crew will trim/remove any landscaping In the way of Installing neiical piles. 11 I� FOUNDATION SPECIALIST Crew will be installing helical piles #2-5malong the South side of home's foundation, crew will be careful of landscaping, and will need areas trimmed or removed in specified areas where piles will be placed. Picture for reference. Crew will be drilling 3/8's holes every 2'-3' in interior basement slab in highlighted locations marked on elevation map to lift and void fill to maximum practical recovery. Furniture will need to be removed and tiling will need to removed in the highlighted locations. Photographs provided by R&R Foundation Specialists. Note that analysis assumptions such as building geometry, tributary areas, and loading were determined through examination of these photographs and industry knowledge of standard construction practices. - L120 LONGITUDE ONE TWENTYO ENGINEERING & DESIGN =� (D0� =QLU z � j z 0 GV 0 ~ U N 10 of 23 PROJECT NO. NO. S221006-3XR SSK-01 PROJECT 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020. SUBJECT Foundation Stabilization/Jacking BY NJ DATE (E) WOOD FRAMED FLOOR SYSTEM, FIELD VERIFY 8" MIN THICKNESS, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY d 12/8/22 (E) CONIC STEM WALL 1111=II II-1111= ' "' I�IIIIIII�I111111�11111 T/STEM WALL = FIELD VERIFY T/FIN GRADE _ VARIES 1111=IIII-1111= (E) FTG TO BE CUT FLUSH IIII=1111=III WITH FACE OF STEM WALL 1111=IIII=1111- WITH A 12" MAX WIDTH FOR '=IIII=1111- III: INSTALLATION POCKET '- 1111=IIII=1 I-1 v'-IIII-11 -1111. . III�IIII IIII=11 ��=lil1=1111=1111=IIII-1111 � �- ° "" "' -1111=IIII-1 d (E) CONTINUOUS CONIC FOOTING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY NOTED MINIMUM EXISTING FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ENGINEER -OF -RECORD TO BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION IF MINIMUMS NOT MET. 2. ALL ASSEMBLY COMPONENTS SHALL BE FULLY SEALED BY A CORROSION RESISTANT SYSTEM. THIS INCLUDES ALL FINAL CUT ENDS AND DRILLED HOLES. CORROSION PREVENTION COATING SYSTEM BY OTHERS. PRIME AND PAINT PER MFR OR GALVANIZATION PER ASTM 153/A123. 3. AT CUT INSTALLATION POCKET ALL EXPOSED STEEL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE SEALED OR COATED TO PREVENT CORROSION. T/CONC FTG = FIELD VERIFY IDEAL HELICAL PILE & REPAIR BRACKET ASSEMBLY PER R&R FOUNDATION SPECIALIST TO CONFORM TO ESR-3750 L120 ENGINEERING & DESIGN 1 1/2 X 1 SLOT(TYP) 3 X 3/4 SLOT(TYP) 2 7/8" TRUFORCE BRKT BRACED BASE GALV. TOP 2 7/8" TRUFORCE BRKT BRACED BASE GALV. FRONT TRUFORCE UNDERPINNING BRACKET FOR 2 7/8'' PILE SHAFT �7%2� + + 1 1/2 X ] 2 7/8" TRUFORCE BRKT T-BRKT GALV. SLOT (TYI TOP 2 7/8" TRUFORCE BRKT T-BRKT GALV. FRONT NOTES: 1. PLATE STEEL TO MEET OR EXCEED REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A572/A1018/A656, 50 KSI. 2. ALL WELDING TO BE PERFORMED BY SHOP QUALIFIED WELDOR TO AWS D1.1 STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE - STEEL. 3. GALVANIZING PER ASTM A153/ASTM A123. BARE STEEL IS ALSO AVAILABLE. 4. ULTIMATE STRUCTURAL CAPACITY IS 60 KIPS. 5. (2) 7/8"-9 X 3' GALVANIZED THREADED ROD - ASTM A193 (GRADE B7). 6. (4) 7/8" GALVANIZED HEX NUT - ASTM A194. 7. (6) 7/8" GALVANIZED FLAT WASHERS - ASTM F436. (2) WASHERS MUST BE USED ON THE TOP OF EACH THREADED ROD (ABOVE THE 'T' BRACKET) TO OBTAIN THE FULL BRACKET CAPACITY. 8. HELICAL PILE ASSEMBLIES MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ICC-ES AC358 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR HELICAL FOUNDATION SYSTEMS AND DEVICES. . 4 22 2020 -KED 0 D Ec A L 4 23 2020 1 kL �L MANUFACTURING, INC. PICTURE PARKWAY STER, NY 14580 Group 789-4810 1 WWW.IDL-GRP.COM NOT TO SCALE SIZE DWG NO R ALL UNITS IN INCHES U.N.O. B I 278TFBPG THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF IDEAL MANUFACTURING, INC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF IDEAL MANUFACTURING, INC. IS PROHIBITED. SHEET 1 OF 1 MAXIMUM TORQUE NOT TO EXCEED 8,300 FT-LBS. ULTIMATE CAPACITY IS 74.7 KIPS BASED ON A CAPACITY TO TORQUE RATIO OF kc = 9 FT-1 [L] ILI D� �p3 � �p3 ` L COUPLING m. BOLTS & NUTS EXTENSION FLIGHTED EXTENSION FLIGHTED EXTENSION (EX: 278203EXT[L]G) SINGLE HELIX (SH) DOUBLE HELIX (DH) (EX: 278203FESH[L][DI]X[T]G) (EX: 278203FEDH[Q[DiD�]X[T]G) NOTES: 1. PILE SHAFT TO MEET OR EXCEED REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM A500, 80 KSI. 2. PLATE STEEL TO MEET OR EXCEED REQUIREMENTS OF ATSM A572, GRADE 50. 3. ALL HELICES ARE FORMED BY PRESS DIE. LEADING EDGE OF HELICES ARE TAPERED TO IMPROVE INSTALLATION CAPABILITIES. 4. HELIX SPACING IS THREE (3) TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE LOWER HELIX. B SPACING OF LEADING HELIX ON FLIGHTED EXTENSIONS IS THREE (3) TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE LAST HELIX ON THE PRECEDING SHAFT. 5. STANDARD HELIX DIAMETERS ARE 8", 10", 12", & 14". STANDARD HELIX THICKNESS IS 3/8". 6. ALL WELDING TO BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED WELDOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWS D1.1 STRUCTURAL WELDING CODE - STEEL. 7. HOT DIP GALVANIZING PER ASTM A153/ASTM A123. BARE STEEL IS ALSO AVAILABLE. 8. (2) 3/4" DIAMETER X 4 1/2" LONG GALVANIZED HEAVY HEX BOLT ASTM A325 AND (2) 3/4" GALVANIZED HEAVY HEX NUT ASTM A194 (GRADE 2H). 9. HELICAL PILE ASSEMBLIES MANUFACTURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ICC-ES AC358 (IDEAL REPORT #ESR-3750) ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR HELICAL FOUNDATION SYSTEMS AND DEVICES. � W 57/8 (TYP) 2 7/8" O.D. X 0.203" W.T. HELICAL LEADS & EXTENSIONS ICC-ES AC358 - REPORT #ESR-3750 � I I D4 D3 �p3 r D= SINGLE HELIX (SH) DOUBLE HELIX (DH) TRIPLE HELIX (TH) QUAD HELIX (QH) LEAD LEAD LEAD LEAD (EX: 278203SH[L][D3]X[T]G) (EX: 278203DH[L][D3D2]X[T]G) (EX: 278203TH[L][DiD2D3]X[T]G) (EX: 278203QH[L][WD2D3D4]X[T]G) 2% O.D. X 2 4 IDEAL PART # ABREVIATIONS: 0.203 W.T. 278 = SHAFT DIAMETER] 3 PITCH 203 = SHAFT WALL THICKNESS (TYP) EXT = EXTENSION FE = FLIGHTED EXTENSION 015/16 SH, DH, TH, QH = SINGLE, DOUBLE, TRIPLE, OR QUAD. HELIX [L] = SHAFT LENGTH IN FEET BOLT HOLE HELIX FORMED BY (EXAMPLE: 7' = 7) DETAIL PRESS DIE [D] = HELIX DIAMETER(S) IN INCHES DRAWN (EXAMPLE: 10" = 10) X— X (SEPARATES HELIX DIAMETER(S) AP 4/3/ 2 CHECKED LRS 4/7/ 2 AND HELIX THICKNESS) [T] — HELIX THICKNESS IDEAL MANUFACTURING, INC. (EXAMPLE: 3/8" = 38) 999 PICTURE PARKWAY G = GALVANIZED WEBSTER, NY 14580 800-789-4810 1 WWW.IDL-GRP.COM NOT TO SCALE ALL UNITS IN INCHES U.N.O. � ii)��1L Group 278203 :NSION SINGLE HELIX (TENSION IPLE =LIX -AD CUT 45° TYPICAL PILE ASSEMBLY THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF IDEAL MANUFACTURING, INC. ANY REPRODUCTION IN PART OR AS A WHOLE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF IDEAL MANUFACTURING, INC. IS PROHIBITED. SHEET 1 OF 1 B 13of23 LONGITUDE ONE TWENTY ENGINEERING & DESIGN PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. S221006-3XR PROJECT 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020. SUBJECT Foundation Stabilization/Jacking BY NJ LOAD ANALYSIS: IBC 2018 - 2-STORY BUILDING Typical Pile 6'-0" Span(Piles 1): Roof LL (snow ground): 25 psf Floor LL: 40psf Floor/Roof DL: 15psf Wall DL: 12psf Stemwall DL: 100 psf (8" wall) Roof Trib: 0.5*28' span = 14' Floor Trib: 0.5*20' max span = 10' Typical Flr Ht: 10' *2 story =20'-0" Case 2: Uniform Load: WDL = 15psf*(14'+10'+10')+12psf*(20')=.75klf WDL (Stemwall) = 100psf* 2.5ft= .25klf WsL =25psf*(14')= 0.35 klf WLL=40psf*(20')= 0.8 klf WTI.= DL+SL+LL = 0.75klf+0.35klf+,8klf = 1.9 klf (wlo stemwall) 0.75klf+0.35klf+0.25klf+.8klf= 2.15kif (wi stemwall) Case 1: Point Load (6'-0" span): PDL= 0.75klf*6'-0" = 4.5 kips PDt (stemwall)= 0.25klf*6'-0" = 1.5 kips Psi= 0.35klf*6'-0" = 2.1 kips PLL= .8klf*6'-0" = 4.8 kips PTA (who stemwall DL) = 1.9klf*6'-0"= 11.4k PTA (wl stemwall DL) = 2.15*6'-0"= 12.9k Refer to attached calculations for analysis. DATE 12/8/22 ------------------------I-'------------------------ L/2 L/2 i-S NOTES: 1. Both uniform and point loads analyzed in the following calculations. Uniform loads are assumed to be standard due to load distribution from bearing walls, however, the additional point load is conservatively considered here for any major beam supports from above. 2. Maximum loading on the grade beam was determined by inspection of the building geometry and through conservative assumptions regarding span lengths and support wall/foundation. All concrete walls assumed full tributary span of floor and roof members. Conclusion: Based on the loading and geometry of the structure we conclude that the foundation may be stabilized through the use of piles and connections per R&R. These are to be attached to the stem -wall (grade -beam) at an on -center (o.c.) spacing no greater than 6'-0". L120 ENGINEERING & DESIGr' 14of23 LONGITUDE ONE TWENTY ENGINEERING & DESIGN LOAD ANALYSIS: IBC 2018 - 1-STORY BUILDING Typical Pile 6'-0" Span (Piles 2-5) Roof LL (snow ground): 25 psf Floor LL: 40psf Floor/Roof DL: 15psf Wall DL: 12psf Stemwall DL: 100 psf (8" wall) Roof Trib: = 6' Floor Trib: 0.5*20' max span = 10' Typical Flr Ht: 10' *2 story + 5' Gable =25-0" Case 2: Uniform Load: WDL = 15psf* (6'+ 10'+10")+ 12psf*(25')=0.69 klf WDL(Stemwall)= 100psf* 2.5ft= .25k1f WsL=25psf*(6')= 0.15 klf WLL=40psf*(20')=.8 klf WTL= DL+SL+LL = 0.69klf+0.15klf+,8klf = 1.65 klf (who stemwall) 0.69klf+0.15klf+.8+.25klf= 1.9kif (wi stemwall) Case 1: Point Load (6'-0" span): PDL= 0.69klf*6'-0" = 4.14 kips PDL(stemwall)= 0.25klf*6'-0" = 1.5 kips PSL= 0.15klf*6'-0" = 1 kips PLL= .8klf*6'-0" = 4.8 kips PrL (w10 stemwall DL) = 1.65klf*6'-0"= 9.9k PrL (w/ stemwall DL) = 1.9*6'-0"= 11.4k Refer to attached calculations for analysis. PROJECT SUBJECT BY NJ PROJECT NO. SHEET NO. S221006-3XR 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020. Foundation Stabilization/Jacki DATE 12/8/22 ---------------------- ----------------------- L/2 L/2 i-S NOTES: 1. Both uniform and point loads analyzed in the following calculations. Uniform loads are assumed to be standard due to load distribution from bearing walls, however, the additional point load is conservatively considered here for any major beam supports from above. 2. Maximum loading on the grade beam was determined by inspection of the building geometry and through conservative assumptions regarding span lengths and support wall/foundation. All concrete walls assumed full tributary span of floor and roof members. Conclusion: Based on the loading and geometry of the structure we conclude that the foundation may be stabilized through the use of piles and connections per R&R. These are to be attached to the stem -wall (grade -beam) at an on -center (o.c.) spacing no greater than 6'-0". L120 ENGINEERING & DESIGN 15 of 23 Project Number: Plan Name: Sheet Number: S221006-3XR 841 Puget Way Engineer: Subject: Date: NJ 2ft Unreinforced Conc Beam 12/8/2022 DEMAND CALCULATION numberofstories # 2stories span L 6.0 ft concrete area A 216 in2 concrete self weight SW 250 plf Pt DL DL 4.50 k = 6.0 ft * 946 Pt LL LL 4.80 k = 6.0 ft * 980 Pt LLr LLr 2.10 k = 6.0 ft * 100 moment from DL MDL 7,875 lb-ft 94.5 k-in moment from LL MLL 7,200 lb-ft 86.4 k-in moment from SL MLL, 3,150 lb-ft 37.8 k-in factored moment MLRFD 132.3 k-in 1.4DL MLRFD 270.5k-in 1.2DL + 1.6LL + 0.5SL MLRFD 260.3k-in 1.2DL + 1.6SL + LL controlling factored moment M„ 270.5 k-in factored shear VLRFD 4.2 k 1.4DL VLRFD 8.0k 1.2DL + 1.6LL + 0.5SL VLRFD 7.7k 1.2DL + 1.6SL + LL controlling factored shear V. 8.0 It controlling factored bearing B„ 8.0 It concrete strength Pc 2.5 ksi assumed light wt concrete mod. factor A 1 normal weight concrete flexure strength red. factor 41ee. 0.9 tension -controlled shear strength red. factor Cheap 0.75 bearing strength red. factor bearing 0.65 moment of ineritia Ix„ 11,016 in4 elastic section modulus Sm 1,001 in3 tens fiber to NA c 11.0 in nomflexure strength (T controls) Mn 250.4 k-in Mn = 5AFfcSm nomflexurestrength(Ccontrols) Mn 2,128.1k-in M=0-85f,.'S„ RESIDENTIAL CONCRETE Mn 375.5 k-in Mn = 7.55a. f'rSm CONTROLS flexure strength W. 338.0 k-in > Mu OK nom shear strength V, 14.4 k V.= 3 2V / c -A shearstrength TVn 10.8 k > Vu OK loaded bearing area A, 74 in2 supporting surface bearing area Az 74 in2 nom bearing strength Bn 156.6k 0.85fA1 bearing strength 4)121n 101.8 k > Bu OK Additional Verification Calc: max concrete tensile strength fr 375 psi f = 7.5d max beam tensile stress FL 270 psi Ft = (M * c)/ Lxx f, > Ft 0K [max on -center pile spacing] *see attached [Includes total height w/o ACI14 §14.5.1.7 redux] [2-story loading] [2-story loading] [2-story loading] [R=V for SS beam] ACI14 [Table 21.2.11 ACI14 [Table 21.2.1] ACI14 [Table 21.2.1] *see attached *see attached *see attached ACI 318-14 [Eq. 14.5.2.1a] ACI 318-14 [Eq. 14.5.2.1b] ACI 332-14 [Eq. 8.2.1.11 D/C= 80.04% ACI14 [Table 14.5.5.1 (a)] D/C= 73.75% [IDEAL 2-7/8" Tru-Force Underpinning Bracket] [If the supporting surface is > than loaded area] ACI14 [Table 14.5.6.1 (c)] D/C= 7.82% ACI 14 [Eq. 19.2.3.11 16 of 23 Project Number: Plan Name: Sheet Number: S221006-3XR 841 Puget Way Engineer: Subject: Date: NJ 2ft Unreinforced Conc Beam 12/8/2022 Final Section Prooertres Total Area 216.0 in12 1xx 11,016.0 104 Sxx: - Y = 1,001.4S in13 lyyr 1,631.93 in"4 Sxx : +Y 847.38 in 'a Calculated fine! C.G. distance Tram Datum : x cg Dlsl. = 0.0 in 7xx 1,349.99 In 3 Syy : - X _ 271.988 in"3 Syy : +){ R 271.98$ in 3 Y eg Dist. = 0.0 in ZYY 504.0 in^3 Edge Distances from CO- : r xx 7.141 in +x = 6.0 in +Y 13.0 In r Yy 2.749 in -x -6.0 in -Y In Rotation of All Components @ . 0.00 deg CCW Per AC114§14.5,1.7 General - I _ #1 Xcg = 0.000 in Ycg = 0.004 in Rotation = O deg CCW Top Flange Widln = SMOin Tap Flange Thick = 8.040in Web Thickness = SA00in Bottom Flange Wid 12.00Oin Sottom Flange Thii 6.000in Tap Height = 24MOIn 17of23 Appendix Parcel Details & Photographs 18of23 SnohomishOnline Government Information & Services County 4* �Ilfashinglnn Property Account Summary 10/26/2022 Parcel Number 00496000000300 Property Address 1841 PUGET WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020-2645 Tax Balance Pay Online Visit our payment site to make an online payment. PAY NOW Installments Pa able _ Pay By Mail Make Check/Money Order to: Snohomish County Treasurer Send to: Snohomish County Treasurer 3000 Rockefeller Ave M/S 501 Everett, WA 98201 Tax Year linstallment IDue Date I Principal Interest, Penalties and Costsl Total Duel Cumulative Due 2022 12 10/31/2022 1 $4,465.741 $0.001 $4,465.741 $4,465.74 Distribution of Current Taxes District Voted Amount Non - Voted Amount Rate Amount CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUT 0.18 $196.70 $0.00 $196.70 CITY OF EDMONDS 1.18 $1,261.84 $359.47 $902.37 EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 15 3.19 $3,410.59 $3,410.59 $0.00 PORT OF EDMONDS 0.08 $86.76 $0.00 $86.76 PUB HOSP #2 0.06 $61.47 $0.00 $61.47 SNO-ISLE INTERCOUNTY RURAL LIBRARY 0.39 $418.32 $0.00 $418.32 SNOHOMISH COUNTY-CNT 0.60 $639.37 $0.00 $639.37 STATE 2.67 $2,848.41 $0.00 $2,848.41 SNOHOMISH CONSERVATION DISTRICT $8.02 $0.00 $8.02 TOTAL 8.35 $8,931.48 $3,770.06 $5,161.42 Pending Property Values Pendingi Market Land Market Tax Year Value Improvement Value Market Total Value Current Use Land Value Current Use Improvement Current Use Total Value 2023 $1,048,600.00 $310,900.00 $1,359,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Levy Rate History Tax Yearl Total Levy Rate 19 of 23 2021 8.265232 2020 9.337975 2019 9.270960 Real Property Structures I l Y Description iType IYear Built IMore Information Tri-Level IDwelling 11962 IView Detailed Structure Information Receipts Date Receipt No. Amount Tendered Amount Due 03/02/2022 08:36:00 12018968 $4,465.74 $8,931.48 11/08/202100:00:00 11985285 $3,954.27 $3,954.27 04/16/202100:00:00 11513632 $3,915.12 $7,830.24 10/26/2020 08:20:00 11227060 $4,292.95 $4,292.95 04/20/2020 00:00:00 11049082 $4,292.94 $8,585.89 10/30/2019 00:00:00 10812011 $4,134.65 $4,134.65 04/30/2019 00:00:00 10546407 $4,134.64 $8,269.29 11/01/2018 00:00:00 10265580 $4,113.81 $4,113.81 05/02/2018 00:00:00 9998787 $4,113.80 $8,227.61 10/24/2017 00:00:00 9558999 $3,559.61 $3,559.61 04/26/2017 00:00:00 9405236 $3,559.611 $7,119.22 Sales History Sale Entry Recording I Recording Sale Excise Deed Transfer Grantor(Seller) Grantee(Buyer) Other Date Date Date Number �AmountiNumber Type Type I Parcels No Sales History Found I Property Maps Neighborhood Code ITownship 111ange iSection lQuarter 1parcel Map 1605001 127 103 124 JNW jYiiew parcel maps for this Township/Range/Section I General Information Property Description LAURELHURST PARK BLK 000 D-00 - LOT 3 Property Category Land and Improvements Status Active, Locally Assessed Tax Code Area 00210 Property Characteristics Use Code 111 Sin Unit of Measure Acre(s) Size (gross) 0.28 Residence - Detached Related Properties FN—o Related Properties Found i Parties Role Taxpayer ent Name Address 100 SMITH 841 PUGET WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 CYRUS B United States 20 of 23 Owner Property Values �841 PUGET WAY, EDMONDS, WA 98020 B United States Value Type Tax Year Tax Year 2021 2020 Tax Year 2019 Tax Year 2018 Tax Year 2022 Taxable Value Regular $1,068,500 $946,400 $918,600 $891,200 $766,200 Exemption Amount Regular Market Total $1,068,500 $946,400 $918,600 $891,200 $766,200 Assessed Value $1,068,500 $946,400 $918,600 $891,200 $766,200 Market Land $806,200 $702,300 $686,900 $666,900 $565,100 Market Improvement $262,300 $244,100 $231,700 $224,300 $201,100 Personal Property Active Exemptions No Exemptions Found Events Effective Date jEntry Date -Time IType Remarks No Events Found 21 of 23 'Snohomish County Online Government Information & Services Structure Information Close Window General Description Parcel Number 00496000000300 (R01) Structure Class Dwelling Structure Type Tri-Level Year Built 1962 Exterior Features Foundation Cone or CB Exterior Siding -Lap ROOF Type: Gable Pitch Low Cover Composition Interior Features Bedrooms 3 Full or 3/4 Baths 3 1/2 Baths 0 Heat Forced Hot Air - Gas Fireplace Masonry 2s stacked fireplace Floor Area Floor 1 Base SF 1566 Finished SF 1566 Floor L Base SF 638 Finished SF 638 Garage(s), Carport(s) and major outbuilding(s) Attached Garage SF 560 Other Features k u 464W W6 4, 1 i q+i 22 of 23 iSFr 1566 s.f. 31 4 3 1 26 22 0 Existing building plan provided by Snohomish County records for Parcel #:00496000000300 for address: 841 Puget Way, Edmonds, WA 98020. Note that analysis assumptions such as building geometry, tributary areas, and loading were determined through examination of these photographs and industry knowledge of standard construction practices. -L120 23 of 23 Photographs provided by R&R. Note that analysis assumptions such as building geometry, tributary areas, and loading were determined through examination of these photographs and industry knowledge of standard construction practices. -L 120