Loading...
Short Plat 1966 (S-50-66)CITY OF EDMONDS FILE Nd. 5- J o- 6 6 EDMONDS, WASHINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION DATE F - /g,-4,_6 Subdivisions - Triplicate REC'T NO. 3 ass:' (-Plats - Duplicate) FEE /a . 0, U ut�- 4tt'- W-Q-d SUBDIVISION [1:j (Appl. Deadline: 3st Wed.) PLAT=(Appl. Deadline: Th (Fee - $10.00) } h�o„„^ x a ,-'-u.) (Fee as set) # # # # # # # # # # # # # APPLICANT: Vernon F. P1etz ADDRESS:11022 239th Pl. S.W. PHONE: LI 6-1187 OWNER: same ADDRESS: PHONE: We are asking permission to divide our piece of property into two parcels, each REQUEST,• containing mote than the 12,000 square foot minimum, with a 15 foot (or more if required) driveway easement along the nor proper y ine. LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Tract 34, Talbot Park, according to plat thereof recorded in volume 12 of plats, page 107, records of Snohomish County, Washington. Use Zone: LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED & APPROVED Kroll Map No.: By Date CERTIFICATION: I do hereby certify that I own the above legally described property, and further, that all contiguous property which I own, which has not received a previous subdivision approval, is included herein:— SKETCH"* Show below dr Attach sketch df proposed subdivision per ek"ple shown on the reverse side. On subdivisions, whexe passible,s indicate location bf existing septic tanks and drain fields. Include vicinity sketch of the area per example shown on the reverse side. On subdivisions, attach statement of reasons why you propose to divide property in the manner shown. Include any pertinent information not apparent on the sketch. 7-4// !1-S'07- fi'10 The reason we propose to divide the ?property in the manner shown is that it is the only wa,y in which it could be divided, making both parcels ce- sirable. In regard to the deiveway easement, as far as the lot itself goes, it could be placed on either the south boundary or the north boundanr. How- ever, the lot slopes slighitly to the north and because of this and, also, for appearances' sate, we feel it might be more desirable to have it on the north boundazy. The sketch shows it tentatively on the south side, mainly because of the Garage building which is situated approx. 15 feet from the north ,property line. I,f. the driveway easement were approved for the north boundarythe garage -wmuld be removed to make room .for the drive- T.'ay, if necessaxy%. However, the garage building is structurally in `food condition and could be used as such. if redesigned to confoina ti*ith any new construction. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTER COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) ss. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) .W. J. SLABAUGH , Building Inspector for the City of Edmonds, being first duly sworn, on oath deposes and says: THAT the attached is a true copy of a Notice of Hearing Petition for Proposeii ___._S}jhdivision as it was posted on or adjacent io the property legally described therein on the 7th day of October , 196 6 . THAT said Notice was posted in three conspicuous places as prescribed by the Code of the City of Edmonds. DATED this 7th day of October , 196 6 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this ^ /�� day of , 196�. .G�rei NOTARY PUBLIC in and for Snohomish County, Washington, residing in ems. '7 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 019 FM1*0 D All interested persons are hereby notified that Wednesday, the Aluth day of �vtob-wr 19 66 , has been set as the i date for hearing by the Edmonds Planning Commission on proposed of the property located 04 thc- WO$t foie-0 Of ltalbOt fir rMu""'Oriok Pl* legally described as follows: n,act 34j, nat of Talbot ivark, accordlug to plat vhereor, ve-corded. in voiwma 142 of P"a go, pa'g'* 1-07,5 mcox%!"s of Z404xudsh cowstyf Watov'U0 Said hearing will be at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington, and all interested persons are invited to appear. IRENE VARNEY MORAN City Clerk, City of Edmonds File No. Publish: S-`!Zb -66 SOUTHWEST SNOHOMISH COUNTY JOINT PLANNING COUNCIL 114 5TH NORTH EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 99020 REQUEST rOR PLANNING COUNCIL REVIEW JURISDICTION DATE CITY OF EDMONDS 10/14/66 TYPE OF REQUEST 0 FOR CC -:NC I1_ INFORMATION ONLY IM REVIEW & COMMENT WRITTEN RECOMMENDATION TYPE OF PROPOSAL t Q PRELIMINARY PLAT j: SUBDIVISION 173 REZONE ANNEXATION 1 L2 FINAL PLAT (:3 CONDI Tl ONAL USE tj VARIANCE OTHER ! NAME AND ADDRESS OF APPLICANT PHONE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING $ Vernon F. Pletz 11022 - 239tb Pl. S.W. LI 6-1187 10/19/66 A-CRES3 AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Tract 34, Talbot Park 1 (SPECIFIC ACTION BEING REQUESTED AND REASONS FOR APPLICATION {REZONE FROM RM TO BC,LTC"' 2-lot subdivision I'~LANNING COUNCIL STAFF REPORT NO OBJECTION. l PLANNING NG COUNCIL STAR APPROVE, SUBJECT TO CITY ENGINEER'S ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT. SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING PLANNER DATE ! A4 f OCTOBER 19, 1966 ChLCK LIST OF ENGINEERING REQUIREMLsfS FOR SUBDIVISIONS Name Vernon F. Pletz File No. S-50-66 Date October 26, 1466 STREETS AND ACCESS f1 Q 1C 1. Right--of-way Requirements: 5 feet on west side of Talbot Road. 2. Road Bed Width: 3. Turn Around: 4. Sidewalks: 5. Parking Strip: 6. Dedication: 5-foot strip,east side of Tract 34. 7. Access Easements: 20 feet minimum. UTILITIES 1. Water Mains: a. Size Mains: b. Fire Hydrants: 2. Sewers or Septic Tanks: Septic tanks to be designed and installed in accordance with City Code. 3. Drainage: Install all necessary storm sewers and drainage facilities per drainage plan. Where drainage is across adjacent private property, necessary release of damages or release of drainage easements must be furnished. Any drainage problems created by change of contour during plat development must be corrected prior to plat approval or re.lease.of plat bond. Final approval of plat (or release of plat bond) will be withheld until actual drainage as installed has been inspected by the City Engineer._ 4. Utility Easements: TOPOGRAPHY City. ineer CIVIC CENTER 50 FIFTH AVE. N. PROSPECT 6-1107 CITY OF E D M O N D5, Snohomish County, Washington TO: Mr, Vernon F, Pletz 11022 239th Place S,.W, Fdmonda t Washington Re: File N o . 8-2o..66 Dear Sir: Enclosed is copy of the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of jQZ26/66 , on which date hearing on your application.for approval of Subdivisions was held. Results of your hearing are reflected in the minutes, encircled in red. Also enclosed is a, Check List of Engineering Requirements. Encl. Yours very truly, CITY OF EDMONDS Secretary Edmonds Planning Commission 0 Edmonds Planning Commission Meeting - 10/26/66 (Page 3) S-46-66, Jim Fitzberg - 201ot subd. on Meadowdale Beach Rd., 16500 block (cont'd from 9/21/66) Mr. Larson said there had been a question about some sort of r/w to extend between Demery Road and 72nd W. A proposal had been submitted, and he gave the Planning Commission a revised sketch which had been submitted to him. The property on the south has potential for subdivision or platting, but not until such time as the sewers are put in. Mr. Meyring said that at the present time they are in the process of acquiring Tract 87, and the appli- cant has right to easement to serve Tract B. Question of where it will be located. They propose that an easement road be connected to the proposed right-of-way. There was no discussion from members of the audience. Mr. Larson said he would propose putting the road on the Comprehensive Plan and would request a hearing. The only other access is private. It was determined that that portion of the proposed right -of --way lying within the subdivision could be dedicated, although Mr. Fitzberg would have to get a release from the fee simple owner. It was then moved by Mr. Haines, seconded by Mr. Propst, that subdivision request No. S-46-66, as submitted at this meeting in revised form, be approved subject to the dedi- cation of 50' r/w to the City on Lot 87 and that portion of Lot 88 lying within Lot B, and of proper 25' easement access to Lot B, together with dedication of 5' r/w on Demery Road, and conditional on compliance with engineering standards in regard to grade cuts and fills. Motion carried. S-47-66, Del Dern 6 Bertha Nelson - 4-lot subd. at 17216 - 76th W. (cont'd from 9/21/66) Mr. Larson reported on engineering requirements as set forth in the Check List submitted to the Planning Commission, including a requirement for dedication of 30 feet of right- of-way for 173rd S.W. from south portion of the property. A revised sketch had been submitted. There was no comment from the audience. It was moved by Mr. Stallbaum, seconded by Mr. Thompson, that subdivision No. S-47-66 be approved as submitted in revised form, subject to engineer's requirements as previously set forth. Motion carried. S-49-66, Wendell S. Faneuf - 2-lot subd. on Olympic View Dr. at 174th S.W. (cont'd from 9/21/66) A revised sketch had been submitted. Mr. Larson reviewed engineering requirements as submitted in Check List. He noted that the existing road is not located in the right-of- way; however, the subdivision as submitted adequately provides access from the r/w. The problem of trying to relocate the roadway into the r/w is something that has to be resolved by the City, but no need to hold up the subdivision. No road dedication is needed. There was no comment from the audience. The Planner recommended approval as submitted. It was moved by Mr. Stallbaum, seconded by Mr. Thompson, that subdivision File No. S-49-66 be approved in accordance with revised sketch wherein the two lots abut on Olympic View Drive. Motion carried. IS-50-66, Vernon F. Pletz - 2-lot subd, on Talbot Rd. SW of Frederick P1. Affidavit of poster presented. The application was reviewed and letter attached to the application read.. Mrs. Shippen reported that she and Mr. Haines investigated the subdivision; that the lots are of more than adequate size, with the back lot reached by a 20' easement, which the applicant has stated he prefers on the north, although it is indicated on the south. The garage would come out if it is put on the north side. Engineering requirements indicated dedication of a 5-foot strip, east side of Tr. 34. Mr. Lyle Nichols attended in the absence of Mr. Pletz, stating that he also has property in Talbot Park and is in favor of the subdivision. Mr. Haines said the only possible objections were those raised earlier in the meeting by other residents of Talbot Park. Inasmuch as it appeared to be impossible at that time to put a road between, even though an easement may not be the best method, it seems to be the only one. It was then moved by Mrs. Shippen that subdivision No. S-50-66 be approved with the easement on the north boundary of the front lot, and subject to the requirements of the City Engineer, as set forth in the Check List submitted to the :Planning Commission. On second by Mr. Stallbaum, the motion carried.