The URL can be used to link to this page

2014.11.25 CC Agenda Packet AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers ~ Public Safety Complex 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds SPECIAL MEETING NOVEMBER 25, 2014 6:30 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 1.(10 Minutes)Convene in Executive Session regarding potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(I). (Jury Meeting Room) 2.(20 Minutes) AM-7302 Meet with candidates Peggy Irwin Soraich and Joan Longstaff for appointment to the Cemetery Board (Jury Meeting Room) STUDY SESSION NOVEMBER 25, 2014 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE 3.(5 Minutes)Roll Call 4.(5 Minutes)Approval of Agenda 5.(5 Minutes)Approval of Consent Agenda Items A.AM-7300 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of November 18, 2014. B.AM-7312 Approval of claim checks #211553 through #211670 dated November 20, 2014 for $835,009.31 (reissued check #211583 $33.75). Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #61283 though #61292 and #61382 for $467,030.85, benefit checks #61293 through #61298 and wire payments of $447,898.00 for the pay period November 1, 2014 to November 15, 2014. Approval of payments for Holiday buy back (check #61299 though #61348) for Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees and Law Enforcement Support Service Employees in the amount of $125,150.61 and Kelly buy back (check #61349 through #61381) for Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees in the amount of $36,909.77 Packet Page 1 of 433 per union contracts. C.AM-7276 Approval to Surplus Computer Equipment D.AM-7303 Confirmation of Peggy Irwin Soraich and Joan Longstaff to the Cemetery Board in positions #3 and #4. E.AM-7310 October 2014 Budgetary Financial Report 6.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)* *Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings 7.(10 Minutes) AM-7309 Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement with David Evans & Associates for the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements project 8.(10 Minutes) AM-7299 Interlocal Agreement for Jail Services with the City of Lynnwood 9.(20 Minutes) AM-7313 Presentation of the Train Trench Concept by Tetra Tech 10.(10 Minutes) AM-7301 Deputy Director Parks job description and salary range approval 11.(30 Minutes) AM-7308 Discussion on the Proposed 2015-2020 Capital Facilities Plan/Capital Improvement Program. 12.(60 Minutes) AM-7311 Public Comment and Continued Discussion regarding the 2015 Proposed City Budget. 13.(15 Minutes) AM-7278 Council Executive Assistant and Legislative Assistant 14.(15 Minutes)Report on Outside Board and Committee meetings 15.(5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments 16.(15 Minutes)Council Comments 17.Convene in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). 18.Reconvene in open session. Potential action as a result of meeting in executive session. ADJOURN Packet Page 2 of 433 AM-7302 2. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:20 Minutes Submitted For:Dave Earling Submitted By:Carolyn LaFave Department:Mayor's Office Type: Information Information Subject Title Meet with candidates Peggy Irwin Soraich and Joan Longstaff for appointment to the Cemetery Board (Jury Meeting Room) Recommendation Mayor Earling and the Cemetery Board are recommending the appointment of Peggy Irwin Soraich and Joan Longstaff to the Cemetery Board. Previous Council Action Narrative Mayor Earling has met with candidates Peggy Irwin Soraich and Joan Longstaff and feels both will be great additions to the Cemetery Board. Ms. Irwin Soraich holds a degree in history and has experience in fundraising. Ms. Longstaff if a longtime Edmonds resident and businesswoman who has an extensive history of volunteerism in the Edmonds community. Attachments Soraich_app Longstaff_app Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 11/18/2014 02:01 PM Mayor Dave Earling 11/18/2014 02:50 PM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/19/2014 08:12 AM Form Started By: Carolyn LaFave Started On: 11/18/2014 10:35 AM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2014 Packet Page 3 of 433 Packet Page 4 of 433 Packet Page 5 of 433 AM-7300 5. A. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:Consent Submitted By:Scott Passey Department:City Clerk's Office Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of November 18, 2014. Recommendation Review and approve meeting minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative The draft minutes are attached. Attachments Attachment 1 - 11-18-14 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Form Review Form Started By: Scott Passey Started On: 11/18/2014 09:25 AM Final Approval Date: 11/18/2014 Packet Page 6 of 433 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES November 18, 2014 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Diane Buckshnis, Council President Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember Joan Bloom, Councilmember Strom Peterson, Councilmember (arrived 7:25 p.m.) Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Councilmember Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Jim Lawless, Assistant Police Chief Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks & Recreation Director Scott James, Finance Director Shane Hope, Development Services Director Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Rob English, City Engineer Deb Sharp, Accountant Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) At 6:30 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 30 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers Johnson, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Petso, Bloom and Mesaros. Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday, Finance Director Scott James and City Clerk Scott Passey. At 7:02 p.m. Mayor Earling announced to the public present in the Council Chambers that an additional 15 minutes would be required in executive session. The executive session concluded at 7:15 p.m. Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 7:18 p.m. and led the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmember Peterson. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO REORDER THE AGENDA AS FOLLOWS: CHANGE ITEM 8 TO ITEM 11, ITEM 9 TO Packet Page 7 of 433 ITEM 10, ITEM 10 TO ITEM 8 AND ITEM 11 TO ITEM 9. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Peterson was not present for the vote.) COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEMS 6 AND 7 AND MOVE THE DECISIONS FOR THOSE ITEMS TO FOLLOW ITEM 11. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Peterson was not present for the vote.) 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Councilmember Petso requested Items C, D and E be removed from the Consent Agenda and Councilmember Bloom requested Item A be removed. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO APPROVE THE REMAINDER OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Peterson was not present for the vote.) The agenda items approved are as follows: B. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #211469 THROUGH #211552 DATED NOVEMBER 13, 2014 FOR $1,797,077.68 (REISSUED CHECK #211496 $32.76). APPROVAL OF REISSUED PAYROLL CHECKS #61281 $33.11 AND #61282 $708.90 F. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR JAIL SERVICES WITH SNOHOMISH COUNTY G. RENEWAL OF INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR JAIL SERVICES WITH YAKIMA COUNTY Item A: APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 10, 2014 Councilmember Bloom requested the following corrections: • Page 6, 2nd full paragraph, 4th sentence, add “not” following “that it would.” • Page 6, 2nd full paragraph, 5th sentence, change “$86,00” to $86,000.” COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO APPROVE ITEM A. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. (Councilmember Peterson was not present for the vote.) Item C: PUBLIC WORKS QUARTERLY PROJECT REPORT Councilmember Petso suggested the Public Works Quarterly Report should have been reviewed in a study session prior to scheduling it on the Consent Agenda. She relayed a question that she had emailed to Public Works Director Phil Williams: the quarterly report shows the City will be receiving a grant in December for a project on 76th Avenue. When Council last discussed that project, concerns were raised regarding access and the backup that occurs at Edmonds-Woodway High School and College Place Elementary. She questioned why the City would accept a construction grant prior to resolving the access issues. Mr. Williams responded this project provides an opportunity to address backups onto 76th that occur with student drop-off at Edmonds-Woodway High School. Staff has met with representatives from Edmonds-Woodway High School and the Edmonds School District; the conceptual solution is to turn the high school driveway into an exit only and move access to the drop-off area to 216th. Staff will work with Edmonds-Woodway High School to design improvements and striping on their property to allow drop-off to occur in an efficient and safe manner. That design has not yet been done; staff plans to present an amendment to the David Evans & Associates design contract at next week’s study session to add that issue and others. Once resources are available, a detailed design will begin. Packet Page 8 of 433 Councilmember Petso asked about a similar problem that occurs at College Place Elementary. Mr. Williams advised the design phase of the restriping project on the north end has not yet begun. Staff will work with Lynnwood and the Edmonds School District to accommodate the needs of College Place. He summarized staff is aware of the issue and it will be resolved during design. Councilmember Petso asked whether the grant was for the intersection improvements only. Mr. Williams answered yes. COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS TO APPROVE ITEM C. Councilmember Bloom commented the quarterly report indicates the 2014 funds for Neighborhood Traffic Calming have been carried forward into 2015. She recalled those funds had been allocated to the SR 104 crosswalk. Mr. Williams relayed his understanding that a budget adjustment could be made to move those funds into the 2015 budget to supplement the $10,000 budgeted in 2015. The funds for the crosswalk were paid out of ending fund balance. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON ABSTAINED. Item D: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 3982 PROVIDING AMENDMENTS TO THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE (ECDC) MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF "LOT" (ECDC 21.55.010), DEFINING "LOT OF RECORD" (ECDC 21.55.015) AND ESTABLISHING A PROCESS FOR DETERMINING "INNOCENT PURCHASER" (ECDC 20.75.180). (AMD20140001) Councilmember Petso explained she previously voted against this and will vote against it again. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE ITEM D. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER PETSO VOTING NO. Item E: REPORT ON FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS YARD WATER QUALITY UPDATES -DECANT FACILITY RETROFIT PROJECT AND PROJECT ACCEPTANCE Councilmember Petso inquired about the applicability of the City’s purchasing policy to the project; the agenda memo states in accordance with purchasing policies, the Public Works Director can authorize the bid as construction costs for the project were less than $50,000. As this project has an engineer’s estimate of $69,000 and total construction costs of $51,000, she would expect it to be classified as a project in excess of $50,000 and to follow that procedure in the purchasing policy. Mr. Williams answered staff tries to provide all the information about an entire project which is the intent of the purchasing policy. He agreed if the bids had been over $50,000, Mayor Earling’s signature would have been required. Councilmember Petso explained the reason for her questioning was recalling the experience with Haines Wharf. COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO APPROVE ITEM E. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Farrell Fleming, Executive Director Edmonds Senior Center, referred to the proposed update to the Shoreline Master Program (SMP), specifically the restoration opportunity identified in the SMP that would pull back the parking bump-out at the senior center and align it with the bulkhead along the waterfront to restore beach habitat. If this restoration opportunity is pursued, he pointed out the Packet Page 9 of 433 importance of reducing the parking setback to 40 feet as allowed by the SMP. The senior center currently has 79 parking spaces; if the existing bump-out is retained and used for parking, initial studies show up to 109 parking spaces could be provided, a most desirable increase. If the bump-out is pulled back and there is a 40-foot setback, parking spaces will be reduced to 86. A 60-foot foot setback reduces parking below the existing amount. He envisioned the new building would be very popular and the more parking the better. Parking on the waterfront should not be the only consideration; restoring beach habitat and beautifying the area should weigh more heavily in the long run. These two needs, parking versus restoration need to be balanced in light of the public programming nature of the new community/senior center. To achieve that balance, a 40-foot setback is appropriate. At the point construction is ready to begin, the restoration project may be able to attract significant state and federal funds. Brent Malgarin, recalled at the last meeting when Pam Stuller advised there were approximately 350 members of the Edmonds Downtown Business Improvement District (EDBID), Councilmember Mesaros comment he found it surprising that all 350 supported the EDBID. He has been collecting signatures to shut down the EDBID because he is opposed to it on numerous levels. He has contacted 58 members, 48 have signed on to close it, 10 chose not to for various reasons. He summarized not all the members are in favor of the EDBID. Val Stewart, Edmonds, speaking as a resident and not a Planning Board Member, thanked the Council for their unanimous vote on October 21, 2014 to approve a 100-foot setback and 50-foot buffers in the Urban Mixed Use IV shoreline environment in the SMP which shows a commitment to preserving and enhancing the nearshore environment. With regard to Item 8, SMP adoption, she explained the senior center is in the Urban Mixed Use I environment; the Council will need to consider how parking setbacks fit into the overall scheme of beach restoration and public access. She requested the Council consider the following in their decision-making: hard shoreline armoring such as concrete bulkheads, seawalls and riprap is no longer allowed unless there are extreme circumstances. In the past these techniques were utilized to combat shoreline erosion threatening properties along the shoreline. It is now known that hardening a shoreline can endanger neighboring properties and threaten salmon and is best used as a last resort. She described soft shore stabilization which focuses on enhancing ecological functions. Hard armoring techniques use manmade materials not found on the site; soft shore stabilization utilizes natural materials found locally such as sand, gravel, large wood and native plants. A recent UW study showed more shorebirds inhabit unarmored beaches. The connectivity between adjacent beaches is also an important feature of natural shorelines. She suggested two goals for Urban Mixed Use I, to restore natural beach habitat and to preserve and enhance public access. Ron Wambolt, Edmonds, referred to the request by one Councilmember to allocate $100,000 from Council funds in the budget for a train trench study and Mayor Earling’s plans to request $1.25 million from the legislature for an alternatives study. He has also heard the Council plans to only spend $10,000 on a peer review of the study done by the consultant. He did not support spending any money on a specific remedy until a complete study of the alternatives has been conducted. He referred to incorrect information in My Edmonds News about the alternatives. He preferred to find out from experts what the right solution was before spending any money on a specific remedy. 6. PUBLIC HEARING ON 2015 PROPERTY TAXES Mayor Earling recalled the Council voted under Agenda Item 3 to move the decisions on Items 6 and 7 until later on agenda due to Councilmember Peterson’s request to be present for the decision. As Councilmember Peterson has arrived, he suggested moving the decisions back to those items. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO MOVE DECISIONS REGARDING ITEMS 6 AND 7 BACK TO THOSE ITEMS. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Packet Page 10 of 433 Finance Director Scott James described the 2015 Regular Property Tax Levy: • 2015 Budget Includes 1% Property Tax Increase • Assessor Shows City of Edmonds Assessed Values Increasing 10.8% (Increase in AV before adding in new construction) • New Construction adds $26.57 million Assessed Value He described the 2015 Regular Property Tax calculation for the City: Description Amount 2014 Levy Amount $9,819,161 Add New Construction $42,748 Add Allowance for Adjustments $32,985 Add Refunds $6,764 2015 Starting Point $9,901,658 Add 1% of 2014 Levy $98,192 Total 2015 Levy $9,999,850 Mr. James reviewed a graph of the ten year assessed property values history for the City, highlighting assessed values of $4.8 billion in 2005, peaking at $7.7 billion in 2009, and estimated at $6.7 billion in 2015. He provided a graph of the rate per $1,000 of assessed value history, highlighting a rate of $1.69 in 2005, $1.19 in 2008, $1.76 in 2013 and projected to be $1.47 in 2015. He provided an overview of the 2008 – 2015 EMS Tax Levy: • In 2008 citizens voted to make the EMS Levy a permanent $0.50 levy • During 2010 – 2013 assessed property values declined • During this span of time Edmonds assessed value dropped just over 31% • EMS levy cannot exceed $0.50 • In a declining assessed value environment the City’s EMS levy also declines Mr. James provided a comparison of EMS Tax Levy 2009-2015 Year Action EMS Levy Levy Savings 2009 $0.50 Permanent EMS Levy becomes effective $3,854,605 $0 2010 Assessed Values Decline 9.8% $3,477,741 $376,864 2011 Assessed Values Decline 7.5% $3,216,629 $637,976 2012 Assessed Values Decline 9.9% $2,897,322 $957,283 2013 Assessed Values Decline 4.3% $2,772,620 $1,081,985 2014 Assessed Values Increase 10% $3,051,206 $803,399 2015 Assessed Values Increase 11.3% $3,395,376 $459,229 $4,316,736 He reviewed a graph of EMS Property Tax Rate per $1,000 of assessed value history, highlighting $0.47 in 2005, $0.32 in 2008, and permanent levy effective in 2009. He described the 2015 EMS Property Tax calculation for the City: Description Amount 2014 Levy Amount $3,051,206 Add New Construction $13,283 2015 Levy 3,064,489 Add ”Banked Capacity” $330,887 Total 2015 Levy $3,395,376 Packet Page 11 of 433 Mr. James explained why City administration is recommending these tax increases: 2015 New Ongoing Costs: Fire District 1 Services Contract $978,000 Prisoner Care $163,950 ESCA/SERS $9,300 SNOCOM $45,332 Impacts to the General Fund $1,196,582 Future Financial Challenges In 2016 Transfer to 617 Firemen’s Pension Fund S/B increased by: $10,000 In 2016 transfer to 009 LEOFF Fund S/B increased by: $100,000 In 2016 Transfer to 012 Contingency Fund S/B increased by: $442,800 Impacts to General Fund $552,800 Total Impact to General Fund $1,749,382 Mr. James summarized the above financial challenges have no new ongoing source of revenue. He described the impact of the tax increases: • 2014 Average Residence Value: $351,100 • 1% Regular Tax Levy Increase: $5.65 • Keeping EMS Levy at $0.50: $18.96 • Average Residence would pay $24.61 in 2015 • Or about $2.05 per month extra Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members of the public present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the hearing. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 3983, LEVYING 1% REGULAR PROPERTY TAX INCREASE FOR 2015, LEVYING 11% EMS TAX INCRASE AND LEVYING $925,309 FOR PUBLIC SAFETY VOTED DEBT FOR PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX. Councilmember Bloom asked whether the 11% increase in the EMS tax increase was equal to the $0.50 EMS levy. Mr. James answered yes, it would bring the levy up to $0.50. Councilmember Bloom observed the voters already approved a $0.50 EMS tax levy. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. PUBLIC HEARING AND POTENTIAL ACTION ON 2014 AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Development Services Director Shane Hope explained the Council previously discussed these amendments, they were reviewed by the Planning Board and a recommendation forwarded to the City Council and the Council had further discussion in August. She identified the proposed amendments: • Replace the existing Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan with the plan approved by Council in February 2014 • Replace the existing Community Cultural Plan with the plan approved by Council in February 2014 • Text amendment regarding Westgate o Does not change the code Packet Page 12 of 433 o Work with the existing code or the proposed code for Westgate. Parks & Recreation Director Carrie Hite explained there was a robust public process to develop the PROS Plan and Community Cultural Plan. The Planning Board vetted the plans in December 2013 and held a public hearing on January 8, 2014. The Council reviewed the plans and held two public hearings on February 4 and 25 and unanimously approved the plans on February 25, 2014. The plans have been submitted to the State to be eligible for the grant process; grants were due May 1, 2014. This is basically a housekeeping amendment; the City has traditionally included the PROS and Community Cultural Plans in the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Hope advised the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is not part of this proposed amendment. That will be considered as part of the budget process and a future amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Earling opened the public participation portion of the public hearing. There were no members of the public present who wished to provide testimony and Mayor Earling closed the public participation portion of the hearing. Councilmember Bloom referred to the Westgate text language and asked the difference between mixed use and a mix of uses and why mixed use was selected rather than mix of uses. Ms. Hope responded they can mean the same thing; mixed use refers to a mix of different types of uses. Councilmember Bloom relayed her understanding of Ms. Hope’s explanation that using one or the other would not limit where uses could be placed on a site and would allow room for whatever final decisions is made regarding Westgate. Ms. Hope agreed. Councilmember Petso referred to discussions regarding flexible mixed use on Highway 99 such as commercial development at the front of a site and residential toward the back instead of the standard mixed use with residential over commercial. She asked whether the term mixed use would include both types of development. Ms. Hope answered it would allow full flexibility. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 3984, AMENDING THE CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; ADOPTING THE 2014 PARKS RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE PLAN AND THE 2014 COMMUNITY CULTURAL PLAN AS ELEMENT S OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO REPLACE THE EARLIER VERSIONS OF THOSE ELEMENTS; AMENDING SUBSECTION C OF THE COMMERCIAL LAND USE CHAPTER OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT TO INCORPORATE NEW LANGUAGE FOR T HE WESTGATE NEIGHBORHOOD. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 8. INTENT TO APPROVE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Senior Planner Kernen Lien reviewed the City approval process: • Assemble complete draft SMP • Complete SEPA review and documentation • Provide Growth Management Act 60-day notice of intent to adopt • Hold public hearing • Prepare a responsiveness summary • Approve SMP and submit to Ecology • Demonstrate compliance with Guidelines He explained Ecology’s approval process generally takes six months to complete. The process for a “minor” amendment is the same as a full blown SMP update. He reviewed the ecology approval process: • Provide public notice and opportunity for comment Packet Page 13 of 433 o Minimum 30 day comment period o Send comments to local government within 15 days o Local government has 45 days to prepare response to comments • Prepare decision packet o 30 days after receiving response to comments, Ecology prepares decision packet o Ecology may:  Approve the submitted SMP amendment as is  Approve the SMP amendment subject to required changes  Delay the SMP Amendment • Work with local government to finalize SMP amendment approval He explained with the proposal to redevelop the Edmonds Senior Center building, questions arose regarding how the SMP applies to the site. The SMP Restoration Plan includes a restoration opportunity: relocation of parking lot (bump-out) to restore beach habitat. In the proposed SMP relocation has been changed to reconfiguration to address the bump-out, not relocation of the entire senior center parking lot. He identified the bump-out on an aerial photograph, explaining the bump-out was constructed in the early 1960s for the geodesic dome that was brought up from the Seattle’s World Fair. He provided a photograph of the bump-out from the beach level and the seawall project completed in 2003. The restoration project would be to remove the bump-out and line up the beachfront. Mr. Lien identified SMP regulations that apply to the Senior Center development: • Urban Mixed Use I Environment • Senior Center structure o 15-foot setback o 30 feet in height • View corridor o 30% of parcel width o Adjacent to north or south property line, whichever will result in the widest view corridor given development on adjacent properties • Parking o 60-foot setback He described parking setback reductions allowed in the Urban Mixed Use II: • 1 square foot for every foot of walkway or publically accessible open space • Minimum 40-foot setback He displayed a potential site plan for the senior center, identifying the 60-foot parking setback. The parking in the site plan is similar to the existing parking; he identified the area of parking that would be considered a nonconforming use and could continue as a nonconforming use. An option would be to apply the parking setback flexibility allowed in Urban Mixed Use II to the Urban Mixed Use I. For Councilmember Bloom, Mr. Lien explained within the Urban Mixed Use I environment where the senior center is located, the parking setback is 60 feet and there is no option to reduce it to 40 feet. In Urban Mixed Use II, the setback can be reduced 1 foot for every lineal foot of walkway or square foot of open space provided to a minimum of 40 feet. He displayed a potential site plan if the bump-out was removed and the parking setback reduced. Councilmember Petso asked what other properties would be affected by a change to allow the parking flexibility in Urban Mixed Use I. Mr. Lien identified the properties in the Urban Mixed Use I environment, advising all properties in that area could benefit from the setback reduction. Packet Page 14 of 433 Mr. Lien identified the provision for parking setback reduction flexibility in 24.60.080.D.3.c; the Council could approve a change to allow the parking setback reduction flexibility that applies to Mixed Use II to apply to Urban Mixed Use I. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO HAVE THE PARKING SETBACK FLEXIBILITY IN URBAN MIXED USE II APPLY TO URBAN MIXED USE I. Councilmember Johnson asked how long the 60-foot setback had been in effect in the SMP. Mr. Lien answered at least since the SMP was last updated in 2000. Setbacks differ for parking and structures, largely because parking is not considered a priority use within the shoreline area. The parking setback flexibility may have been allowed for the Urban Mixed Use II zone because that zone largely applies to the marina where parking is important and where there is a water dependent use versus the Urban Mixed Use I zone where uses are office space and some residential. Councilmember Johnson asked if a 60-foot setback was consistent with any grant or State regulation. Mr. Lien answered not that he aware of. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 1326, EXPRESSING INTENT TO ADOPT AN UPDATE TO THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 9. DISCUSSION ON THE PROPOSED 2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City Engineer Rob English recalled a presentation was made to Council in October; this discussion has been carried forward for several Council meetings. Staff’s recommendation is to approve the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and an ordinance be prepared to adopt the 2015-2020 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) with the budget. Councilmember Johnson commented there is one new project description related to the senior center. Parks & Recreation Carrie Hite highlighted two changes, the first in the CFP related to the senior center. A rebuild of the senior center has been in the CFP for quite some time. That has been revised to reflect that the non-profit will rebuild the senior center and the City’s responsibility will be to rehabilitate the grounds and beach access surrounding the senior center when construction begins. The second change is the addition of the Veterans Plaza in the CIP which includes a project description, project benefit rational and a $10,000 initial budget based on Councilmember Peterson’s recommendation. Council President Buckshnis relayed she has provided input to staff regarding funding for the Sunset Avenue project. She agrees with keeping that project on the list but preferred to see how the design goes before estimating the cost. She felt including $2 million in 2018 was premature. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether the funding was included as a placeholder. Mr. English responded if the City applied for a construction grant in the future to build something more permanent such as sidewalks and facilities on the south and north end, it would be appropriate to have the $2 million in the plan. If the Council chose to construct something less, it was better to have the funds in the plan than to have no funding. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas supported retaining the full $2 million. Councilmember Petso suggested restoring the project description back to a walkway versus a multiuse pathway. She asked why that was not recommended by staff. Mr. English answered that could be done, it was up to the Council. Public Works Director Phil Williams agreed that could be done, pointing out a Packet Page 15 of 433 multiuse path was the intent when staff applied for the design grant. The trial project in place on Sunset Avenue, recommended to be in place for one year, will allow the public to experience the geometry and for the Council and public to evaluate the results. He explained the important of gaining some experience with the multiuse pathway. If it is discovered via that experience that it does not work, the City would have the justification to return to the granting agencies and request a change. If the Council decides to change it to a walkway that does not allow wheeled vehicles like bicycles, etc., that experience cannot be gained and it will look like the City changed its mind rather than having any documented reasons. Council President Buckshnis explained the reason she wanted to remove/lower the dollar amount was to provide the Council more control over determining whether or not to continue with a multiuse path. Mr. Williams assured the Council has total control over the project. The project has not yet been designed; there have been concepts proposed and there is the current trial. At the end of the trial there will be many opportunities for the Council and public to comment on the final geometry. The $2.099 million in funding is in 2018 because the funds are not available and the project has not yet been designed. It is important to have a project and funding in the out years to show the City is thinking about a project that will cost more than a trivial amount of money. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas preferred to retain multiuse in the description at least until the trial period is concluded. Council can change how much is spent on the project, however, changing the project to a walkway at this time defeats the purpose of the trial multiuse pathway. For the granting agency and the public, Councilmember Petso stated her opinion that the concept has been tested and it does not work. The two things that do not work are, 1) the angle parking, and 2) the multiuse pathway. The angle parking is unsafe for drivers backing out and she has witnessed people using the pathway crossing the street to the sidewalk when they see a bicycle approaching. She was hopeful that would be sufficient to persuade the granting agencies should that issue arise. The project was originally on the CIP as a walkway project, people enjoy it as a walkway and she preferred to return to a walkway. Councilmember Johnson asked what the project description was in last year’s CIP. Mr. Williams answered it has been called the Sunset Avenue Walkway. There was an expectation when staff interacted with the granting agencies that a multiuse pathway would be built. His intent is to protect the funds spent to date to bring the project to this point to avoid the granting agencies requesting the money back because the City did not build what they said they were going to build. The project description in the 2012 CIP is to develop a 200-foot trail with the expansive views of Puget Sound, Olympic Mountains and train to connect downtown businesses to surrounding neighborhoods, water access points and the existing parks. The details state the walkway will be ADA accessible and will accommodate walkers, joggers, bicycles, picnickers and those who would enjoy the view. Councilmember Bloom agreed with Council President Buckshnis about removing the amount, explaining the project is very controversial and there are a lot of strong feelings on either side. She will find it difficult to approve the CFP/CIP until the issues related to the Sunset Avenue Walkway have been resolved. She commented this discussion has been scheduled on the agenda on two prior occasions but as removed due to lengthy agendas. There were a number of items on the CFP/CIP that she wanted to discuss further and she felt the Council could not vote on the CFP/CIP tonight without an opportunity for a thorough discussion. Main Motion COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS TO APPROVE THE DRAFT 2015-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) AND DIRECT AN ORDINANCE BE PREPARED TO ADOPT THE 2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP). Packet Page 16 of 433 Councilmember Bloom reiterated the Council has not had enough opportunity to discuss the individual projects on the CFP/CIP. For example the alternatives study is still a large issue; it has been discussed for two years and each time it becomes increasingly confusing as to what the study will consider. Councilmember Mesaros spoke in favor of the motion as well as including $2 million for the Sunset Avenue Walkway project. He emphasized these are not final project plans; it is declaring the City’s intent. The projects will still return to the Council for approval and there will be tremendous opportunities to discuss projects and even discard them. Amendment #1 COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO AMEND TO POSTPONE UNTIL NEXT WEEK’S WORK SESSION. Council President Buckshnis anticipated the CFP/CIP would have been discussed at a study session as there are some contentious items. With regard to whether to include the $2 million for the Sunset Avenue Walkway, she commented there are two sides to every story. The CIP is a wish list; in a perfect world the CIP could match the budget. She supported moving the discussion to a study session. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented Councilmembers’ minds are already made up with regard to the walkway, it was no secret and it had been going for months. She asked, 1) what would be gained by postponing the discussion to another study session where Councilmembers could just agree to disagree again, and 2) when does the CFP/CIP need to be completed and adopted. Mr. English answered the CFP can be adopted with the Comprehensive Plan amendment which was done earlier tonight or when the budget is approved. The CIP is a guidance tool for the budget; it should be adopted ahead of or with the budget. If the Council approved the CFP/CIP tonight, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas asked whether individual projects could come back to Council such as the at-grade separation or the walkway. Mr. English responded the Council could bring specific projects back for discussion. If any project moves forward, there are milestones for City Council approval such as the design consultant, etc. Councilmember Fraley- Monillas observed approving the CFP/CIP with the Sunset Avenue Walkway did not give staff authorization to build it. Mr. English assured pros/cons will be discussed with the Council and public at the end of the trial. Councilmember Peterson asked whether the Alternatives Analysis was in last year’s CFP/CIP. Mr. English recalled a lengthy discussion last year regarding the title of that project. Councilmember Peterson understood there is a lot of controversy regarding the Sunset project but the Council has discussed that project a great deal. There have been fairly extensive discussions regarding most of the other projects as well. The reason he made the motion to approve the CFP/CIP is to take some action and he was unsure what the purpose of postponing would be. He did not support the motion to postpone to next week’s study session, finding the CFP/CIP has been discussed enough. Councilmember Petso referred to inconsistencies between the budget and CIP for 2015 and asked what happened if the budget and CIP did not match. She has discovered at least four instances where they do not match. Mr. English responded there is no specific requirement that the CIP mirror the budget but they should as the CIP is a planning level document. Councilmember Petso recalled in in prior years if the budget included funds in 2015 for a project, the CIP showed the same amount and the CIP description was added to the budget book. It does not appear that was done this year; there are different amounts and different projects. Mr. English expressed interest in the differences she had discovered; it was his understanding Councilmember Petso’s questions had been addressed by the Finance Director. Councilmember Petso said postponing until next week would provide an opportunity for the Council to adopt a CIP that agrees with the budget because they currently do not entirely match. Packet Page 17 of 433 Councilmember Petso asked in what year the Alternatives Analysis was funded. Mr. English answered there is $1 million in 2019 and $1 million in 2020. Councilmember Petso commented that project, which formerly was imminent, had been pushed out to 2019. Mr. English agreed, noting the first three years of the CIP are constrained; projects in the first three years have secured funding or funding is reasonably expected to be secured. Funds for the Alternatives Analysis are not secured; therefore, that project is in the second three years. Mr. Williams advised if the budget and CIP do not match, the budget is controlling as only what is authorized in the budget can be spent. If more was listed in the CIP for a project than was included in the budget, a budget amendment would be required. Mr. Taraday agreed the budget controlled. If the Council wanted to spend money on a preliminary analysis of a train trench and peer review, Councilmember Petso asked whether the train trench would need to be in the CFP/CIP or was that a separate budget item. Mr. English answered the Council could chose to add it to the budget regardless of whether it was in the CIP. City Attorney Jeff Taraday commented there is no RCW that controls the CIP and it can be amended at any time. The CFP, which is part of the Comprehensive Plan and technically subject to the once a year limitation, can also be amended in conjunction with a budget amendment. Councilmember Petso asked whether the CIP needs to be revised to reflect decisions the Council makes during budget deliberations. Mr. Taraday answered because there is no RCW that speaks to the CIP, it is not illegal for the two documents to be inconsistent although he assumed the intent was for them to be consistent. To the extent there was any conflict, the budget controls. Councilmember Petso observed there are projects in the CIP that are inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan such bike lanes on 76th in the CIP and bike lane on 84th in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Taraday responded the CIP and CFP are intended to be consistent. Because the CIP does not have a State law effect, to the extent there is an inconsistency, the CFP controls over the CIP. The CFP is adopted by ordinance as part of the Comprehensive Plan; the CIP is an internal document. Call for the Question COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. UPON ROLL CALL, CALL FOR THE QUESTION CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM, JOHNSON AND PETSO VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS, MESAROS AND PETERSON VOTING NO. Councilmembers misunderstood that the above vote was for the Call for the Question. Reconsider COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION FOR THE CALL FOR THE QUESTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Action on Call for the Question MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Action on Amendment #1 UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT CARRIED (4-3), COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM, JOHNSON AND PETSO VOTING YES; AND COUNCILMEMBERS FRALEY-MONILLAS, MESAROS AND PETERSON VOTING NO. Action on Main Motion COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON WITHDREW THE MAIN MOTION. Packet Page 18 of 433 Mr. Williams requested Councilmembers email staff regarding what they would like to discuss at the study session. Mayor Earling commented what was lost in the Council’s discussion was the fact that the Council ultimately must approve any project before it moves forward which provides plenty of opportunity for investigation and detailed discussions. The decision on the CFP and CIP is in fact not a final decision but simply to keep projects on a list. In some cases it is a wish list; not including any indication of the value on the wish list such as for the Sunset Avenue project begins to neutralize the City’s ability to obtain grants. 10. AUTHORIZATION FOR A SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF DIGITAL UNIVERSAL CAMERA (DUC), STEERABLE PIPE RANGER VIDEO TRANSPORTER AND APPURTENANCES TO RETROFIT THE PUBLIC WORKS SEWER VIDEO CAMERA TRUCK Public Works Director Phil Williams explained the Public Works sewer video truck is used to periodically video the sanitary sewer pipe system to look for defects; those repairs are then added to the Wastewater CIP. The same needs to be done in the storm system which will require an expansion of the current capabilities. The proposed purchase of a higher definition camera will allow staff to video-inspect both sewer and storm pipes using the existing Cues truck/chassis, software and equipment. Cues has an approximately 80% market share in the State of Washington for this type of equipment. The new camera is compatible with an existing chassis and the proposal also includes the purchase of an updated chassis, Pipe Ranger 2. The intent is to begin videoing both storm and sewer pipes late 2014/early 2015. Mr. Williams explained the Storm Fund will pay the Sewer Fund for the trained staff to operate the truck; the cost of the equipment will be shared by the two utilities. In the interest of consistency spare parts, existing training, it is preferable to continue with the existing company, Cues, the reason for the recommendation for sole source procurement. The packet also includes a Vendor Certification stating Cues has not offered this at lower price to other clients. For example, Seattle paid $98,000 for the camera last year; Edmonds’s price is $91,000. He summarized this is a good case for a sole source procurement and he recommends Council approval. Councilmember Petso referred to an email the Council received tonight questioning the appropriateness of the sole source procurement. She asked why this was not first discussed at a study session. Mr. Williams answered it would typically have been discussed at a study session; however, the order needs to be submitted in a couple days in order to pay for it out of the 2014 budget. He assured no additional or different information would have been provided at a study session. Councilmember Petso asked whether the Finance Director had reviewed the sole source procurement and the concerns raised by the citizen. Mr. Williams advised it is not a finance question; the question is whether it meets the criteria in the City’s purchasing policy for a sole source procurement. Councilmember Petso asked whether the policy requires that other vendors be contacted. Mr. Williams answered no. Councilmember Petso asked whether there was a requirement for a firm or not to exceed price. Mr. Williams referred to the letter from Cues that outlines the cost. He assured if the invoice from Cues does not match their quote, it will not be approved. COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDED SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT FROM CUES, INC. OF A VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEM AND VARIOUS SUPPORTING ATTACHMENTS. Council President Buckshnis clarified the reason this vendor was selected was because the City has the equipment that fits this camera. Mr. Williams provided an analogy, rather than purchasing Toyota headlights and adapting them to fit your Honda, it is preferable to purchase Honda headlights. Packet Page 19 of 433 MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. 11. DISCUSSION AND POTENTIAL ACTION ON THE PROPOSED EDMONDS DOWNTOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET FOR YEAR 2015 Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty explained this item is further discussion regarding the 2015 work program and budget for the Edmonds Downtown Business Improvement District (EDBID) also known as the Downtown Edmonds Alliance. At the Council’s request, the EDBID’s 2015 budget compared to previous years will be provided. Pam Stuller, Walnut Street, President, EDBID Members Advisory Board, explained the EDBID has a very effective Board, and each of the 11 elected members take their role as stewards of the EDBID’s resources very seriously. The Board holds publicized semi-monthly meetings that are open to members and the public. The EDBID has accomplished a great deal since their inception approximately 18 months ago from the creation of the bylaws and work plan to a new name and official identity. Much of that progress is due to an enormous amount of volunteerism. As a young organization, Ms. Stuller recognized it took time to develop trust and create a successful precedent. The Board appreciates the scrutiny of the Council and seriousness with which they do their jobs and assured the elected board members share that commitment. While it is discouraging to hear about a petition to disband the EDBID, with over 320 businesses, there remains a tremendous amount of support for what the EDBID is doing. She looked forward to beginning the exciting and strategic work that the EDBID was created to implement. Cadence Clyborne, HDR Engineering, EDBID Treasurer, explained in response the Council’s request, the budget summary was revised to be more consistent with a balance sheet format. She displayed the balance sheet, highlighting the 2015 proposed budget that is in the work plan, 2014 end of year projection, year-to-date, and 2013 final financials. The 2015 proposed budget includes: • Beginning balance of $48,129 • Estimated revenues of $81,880 from assessments (assumes 92% collection rate) • Total revenue of $130,009 • Estimated expenses as outlined in work plan • Estimated ending balance of $46,009 She explained financial information has always been included in the EDBID minutes. At the request of a member a few months ago, the spreadsheet has been posted to the EDBID’s website. In the future the new balance sheet format will be presented at EDBID meetings and posted on the website. The Advisory Board meets at 8:00 a.m. the 2nd and 4th Thursday in Room 225 at the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Main Motion COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS, TO APPROVE THE EDMONDS DOWNTOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT’S 2015 WORK PROGRAM AND BUDGET. Amendment #1 COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO AMEND THE WORK PLAN TO INCLUDE A REVIEW OF THE EQUITY OF THE FEES ASSESSED BY THE CITY TO EDMONDS TO EDBID MEMBERS BE COMPLETED AND PRESENTED TO COUNCIL BY JUNE 2015. Packet Page 20 of 433 Councilmember Bloom relayed her understanding and appreciation for the work done by the Advisory Board. The reason she was proposing these amendments was because in talking with business owners and the fact that a petition was being circulated, there is a lot of conflict and people who are unhappy with the way things have been done as well as how the EDBID was set up. Her amendments are an attempt to resolve the concerns she has heard; unless the concerns of the membership are considered, the EDBID will be unable to move forward in a manner that will work for all the members. For example, although friends of the EDBID and all the members of the EDBID were invited to a get-together, the voucher based on $12 lunches indicated only 26 people attended which was not a good turnout. Councilmember Bloom referred to an email she received at 6:15 p.m. today that she forwarded to Councilmembers expressing concerns with the EDBID. She stated the membership of the EDBID is not supporting the Advisory Board’s work; the business owners she has talked said they wish they had been asked about the Ed! brand and there are questions about the square footage fee assessment. She summarized many members are dissatisfied but are afraid to speak their mind. She recognized the hard work done by the Advisory Board and assumed they would not have to work so hard if they had the support of the membership. With regard to the proposed amendment, Councilmember Bloom pointed out the square footage range for assessments is too large; the EDBID essentially assesses a 5,000 square business and a business with a very small space at a similar rate. Councilmember Petso asked whether the Council has full discretion to review and make changes to assessments. City Attorney Jeff Taraday responded everything about the EDBID is subject to the Council’s discretion. He noted to the extent the direction in Councilmember Bloom’s motion required a financial expense for the EDBID, it did not fit within any of the categories of authorized expenses. Councilmember Petso asked whether a more appropriate way would be to schedule a review of the EDBID fees as a future Council agenda item. Mr. Taraday commented the Council has a lot of power over the EDBID; he was unsure procedurally what would need to happen to review the assessments but he could research that in the meantime. Action on Amendment #1 COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM WITHDREW THE AMENDMENT WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Councilmember Bloom requested the Council President schedule a review of the EDBID Assessments on an upcoming study session. Recognizing that the issue of sending businesses to collections was also not a work plan item, she requested that issue be discussed at a future study session. She pointed out 29 business owners have been sent to collections. Amendment #2 COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REQUEST CLARITY BE ADDED TO ITEM C, ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION, AND ITEM D, MEMBER ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH, SPECIFICALLY REGARDING EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ANONYMOUS INPUT FROM BID MEMBERS. Councilmember Bloom referred to the EDBID’s written response to this suggestion stating this could be incorporated. She requested specific language be included regarding obtaining anonymous input from EDBID members as some members are not comfortable sharing their thoughts. Councilmember Petso asked what specific language Councilmember Bloom would like to have added. Councilmember Bloom suggested Survey Monkey surveys be conducted on a regular basis to get input Packet Page 21 of 433 related to the work the Board is doing. Councilmember Petso asked Mr. Doherty whether that was something he could assist the EDBID with. Mr. Doherty answered yes. Councilmember Peterson asked whether the motion included direction to act on the surveys, pointing out Survey Monkey is very unscientific. Councilmember Bloom said she wanted the Advisory Board to get input from people who are uncomfortable sharing input with the Board. She was not suggesting how they would use the information, only providing an avenue for members to provide input without being identified. Council President Buckshnis asked how the Board would use the input from such surveys. Councilmember Bloom responded she hoped the Board would use the information to inform how they spend the EDBID members’ money. Action on Amendment #2 UPON ROLL CALL, AMENDMENT FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM, FRALEY- MONILLAS AND PETSO VOTING YES; AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS AND COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, MESAROS AND PETERSON VOTING NO. Amendment #3 COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT BUDGETED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES IN ITEM B TO $6,000 FOR 2015 WHICH EQUALS $500 PER MONTH. Councilmember Bloom said the reason for this motion was because there was not the support of the EDBID that she would like to see at this point and she anticipated $6,000 for administrative services would be more acceptable to the membership than $17,000. She explained $6,000 would allow the EDBID to hire a contract administrative person at the rate of $25/hour for 20 hours/month or 5 hours/week. That person could do minutes, post on the EDBID website, etc.; the EDBID could consolidate what the person did and use the person very effectively. Council President Buckshnis referred to the EDBID’s written response that there is a lot of administrative work. Her issue is ensuring the 501(c)3 is totally separate; the EDBID administrator cannot provide administrative services to the 501(c)3. Ms. Clyborne advised their research of other BIDs with 501(c)3s found they have an agreement with the city for payment for services. That has not yet been fully vetted by the board. She advised there are other administrative costs in addition to hiring a consultant such as the post office box, supplies, website fees, etc. Action on Amendment #3 AMENDMENT FAILED (1-6), COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM VOTING YES. Amendment #4 COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO AMEND THE MOTION, TO REMOVE ITEM K, RESEARCH OF POTENTIAL BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, FROM THE WORK PLAN. Councilmember Bloom reiterated due to the conflict in the membership, she felt this was not the time to seek new members. Councilmember Petso asked whether this was something the Council could do when/if they wished. Mr. Taraday suggested to the extent this required a financial expense on the part of the EDBID, it did not fit in any of the categories of expense authorized in the implementing legislation, probably should not be undertaken by the EDBID and therefore would be inappropriate to include in the work plan. Exploring a modification to the boundaries would be more appropriately undertaken by the City or the Economic Packet Page 22 of 433 Development Director. Mr. Taraday provided further context; the Council is approving the budget for the EDBID, authoring them to spend money on certain items. This does not fit within the categories of expense that the City authorized when it created the EDBID; it can be worked on by City staff. He suggested the motion be acted on. If this was not a budget item and was just something the EDBID planned to work on, Councilmember Peterson questioned why it was not appropriate for the EDBID to include it in their work plan. The budget implication would occur if/when a decision was made to expand the boundary. To the extent the EDBID wants to do leg work to explore changing the boundaries, they do not need to come to the Council for authorization if it does not require an expense. That effort would be similar to what occurred prior to forming the EDBID which did not require Council authorization. Mr. Taraday responded by keeping this item in the work plan and the administrative person working on it, that would be an inappropriate use of the funds. Councilmember Peterson suggested if it is not in the work plan, some members may object to the Board talking to potential new members. Mr. Taraday summarized the Council’s role is related to approving expenditures; anything that occurs outside that is not within the purview of this action item. Councilmember Mesaros observed there was nothing in the budget related to Item K and the motion is not in order as it does not reflect budget items which are the Council’s purview. Action on Amendment #4 AMENDMENT CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS PETERSON AND MESAROS VOTING NO. Amendment #5 COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO REMOVE THE $10,000 ALLOCATED TO THE SMALL GRANTS PROGRAM. Councilmember Bloom explained the EDBID membership should not be expected put their money toward the 501(c)3, a separate organization that the EDBID is forming. It made no sense to her and she felt those funds should be retained within the EDBID. Councilmember Petso relayed her understanding the EDBID would be in charge of the small grants, not the 501(c)3. Ms. Stuller explained the intent of the small grants program is to harness the power of the membership by providing them grants to help be the boots on the ground to get more done in the coming year. The grants are intended to completely apply to the scope of work and are a way to help catalyze additional action from the membership. Ms. Clyborne advised the small grants program is entirely unrelated to the 501(c)3. Councilmember Petso relayed the EDBID could have included $10,000 in their budget for miscellaneous projects; by setting up a grant program there will be application deadlines, documentation, etc. Ms. Stuller agreed. Councilmember Petso asked whether the intent was to spend the money “come heck or high water” or would the funds be held if no appropriate applications are submitted. Ms. Stuller advised the funds would not be granted unless appropriate applications were received. Councilmember Petso suggested an amendment requiring each proposed grant be reviewed by City staff for compliance with the applicable RCW and ECC provisions prior to the award of a grant. Ms. Stuller had no objection to adding that language to the work plan. Councilmember Petso advised she would probably not support the proposed amendment and would make the amendment she described. Action on Amendment #5 AMENDMENT FAILED (1-6), COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM VOTING YES. Packet Page 23 of 433 Amendment #6 and Action COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO AMEND THE MOTION TO ADD THE FOLLOWING AS THE NEXT TO THE LAST SENTENCE OF PARAGRAPH J OF THE WORK PLAN, “EACH PROPOSED GRANT WILL BE REVIEWED BY CITY STAFF FOR COMPLIANCE WITH RCW 35.87A.010 AND EDMONDS CITY CODE 3.75.030 PRIOR TO AWARD OF A GRANT.” MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Peterson voiced his opposition to the suggestion of having further discussion regarding some issues at a Council study session, anticipating a series of micromanaging meetings. He recognized it was up to the Council President when/if to schedule that discussion. Councilmember Bloom suggested the Council also discuss having a representative attend EDBID Advisory Board meetings; she recommended the Council President and one other Councilmember. The Council needs to be very involved in the oversight of the EDBID as the EDBID Advisory Board is the only one of the City’s boards that has the authority to spend money. She disagreed with Councilmember Peterson because the Council is responsible even if it possibly means micromanaging. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested this may be an appropriate topic for the Council retreat in early 2015. Action on Main Motion as amended MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM VOTING NO. Councilmember Petso requested the Council President schedule the EDBID fees and collection policy on a future study session. Council President Buckshnis advised she has scheduled those as well as research of a potential boundary adjustment on the December 9 study session agenda. 12. REVIEW & POTENTIAL APPROVAL OF UPDATED RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE MANAGEMENT POLICY Public Works Director Williams advised this was discussed at last week’s study session. A resolution and policy in place since 1978 establishes guidelines for trimming and removing trees in the right-of-way that are not street trees and require any trimming or removal to be authorized via a right-of-way construction permit issued by the City. The policy authorizes specific reasons for trimming or removing a tree in the right-of-way related to safety such as the tree impedes sight lines, is diseased and in danger of falling, or is causing damage or significant maintenance to public infrastructure. Neither the policy nor the resolution included the ability to authorize removal/trimming of a tree in the right-of-way that is damaging private infrastructure. The proposed policy would add the ability for the City to issue a permit if a tree in the right-of-way is causing damage to private infrastructure. The Tree Board reviewed the issue and provided a recommended policy. He referred to three revisions he suggested at last week’s study session, two that were typos and a third, to remove the requirement to obtain a right-of-way permit to trim/remove a tree over 8 feet tall. He pointed out an 8-foot tall tree could be 1-2 inches in diameter. He reviewed the practical implications of requiring a right-of-way permit to trim/remove any tree feet tall over a height of 8 feet: apply for a right-of-way construction permit, minimum price $115; and hire a certified arborist to prepare a report stating the tree meets the criteria for removal, at a cost of several hundred dollars. He doubted many property owners would go to that effort to trim/remove a tree of that size. Further, a tree of that size was unlikely to be causing safety issues or damaging private infrastructure. He noted one of the criteria in the proposed policy was a tree could be trimmed/removed if it had grown to a size that was inappropriate for its current location. Packet Page 24 of 433 Councilmember Bloom expressed concern with removing that requirement in view of how hard the Tree Board worked on the proposed policy. The Tree Board includes a certified arborist and others with experience with trees. She consulted the Tree Board Chair, Susan Paine, who is very familiar with Seattle’s tree code, regarding the proposed change. Ms. Paine’s response was a permit to trim an 8-foot tree is needed; she envisioned a person harming a young tree under 6 inches in diameter by harsh pruning. Councilmember Bloom referred to trees in the right-of-way that have so harshly pruned that they do not grow properly. She preferred to retain the requirement for a permit for trees 8 feet in height. Mr. Williams understood Ms. Paine’s point of view but questioned the City’s ability to control pruning via a permit program. He reminded a tree would need to meet the criteria for removal before a permit could be issued. He suggested an educational campaign citing the national standards on tree pruning rather than a regulatory approach may be more successful in addressing those concerns. Councilmember Petso provided a scenario: a homeowner with a 5-inch diameter tree over 8 feet tall located in the City right-of-way trims the tree periodically. Under the proposed code, that homeowner would be in violation of the code. Mr. Williams agreed the homeowner would be in violation, both in the proposed code and the existing code. Councilmember Petso asked about enforcement. Mr. Williams advised enforcement occurs when a situation is brought to the City’s attention. Councilmember Petso relayed her understanding under the proposed code, a property owner would be required to obtain a right- of-way permit to trim a tree larger than 6-inches in diameter or over 8 feet tall. Mr. Williams agreed. Councilmember Johnson referred to the criteria, observing most of them are very specific and not subject to opinion. However, the criteria that a tree has outgrown its location could be disputed and she preferred it not be included as a criteria. Mr. Williams advised the permit requires a State certified arborist determine the tree has outgrown its location. The City needs to have that expertise available as well; there is currently no certified arborist on staff. When the tree code is presented to Council it will include some resource requests. Councilmember Johnson stated the determination that a tree has outgrown its location is a judgment call and even two arborists could have a difference of opinion. She preferred not to have a judgment call be a criterion, commenting there are historic trees that may be more valuable than the shade they create. COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO EXTEND THE MEETING UNTIL 10:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED UNANIOUSLY. Councilmember Bloom commented the report by a certified arborist would address Councilmember Johnson’s concerns. She agreed it was a subjective, noting there are also plans for a Heritage Tree Program which hopefully will protect valuable, old trees. A certified arborist will be able to determine whether a young tree has outgrown its location or if it is a valuable, old, native tree. Councilmember Johnson recalled when this first arose, the example staff provided was a very mature cedar tree whose roots essentially destroyed the adjacent property owners’ grass. Mr. Williams commented it was a massive Redwood tree that grew very fast. That tree is causing some of the problem listed as criteria for removal/trimming in the policy and the policy would allow roots to be pruned, etc. Another issue with a tree like that is the cost to trim or remove it. As long as the tree is not damaging public infrastructure, the property owner would initiate the process, pay the permit fee, hire the arborist, and pay for removal/trimming if the City is convinced it meets the criteria. Main Motion COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT BUCKSHNIS, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE UPDATED RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE MANAGEMENT POLICY AS AMENDED BY THE EDMONDS CITIZENS TREE BOARD. Councilmember Peterson clarified this was the policy on page 988-990 of the packet (includes amendments recommended by Mr. Williams). Packet Page 25 of 433 Councilmember Bloom preferred to vote on the Right-of-Way Tree Management Policy recommended by the Tree Board. Mr. Williams distributed the policy as recommended by the Tree Board. (includes the requirement for a permit for an 8-foot tall tree). Amendment #1 COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON, TO AMEND THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY CODE ORIGINALLY RECOMMENDED BY THE TREE BOARD. Amendment #2 and Action COUNCILMEMBER PETSO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETERSON, TO AMEND THE AMENDMENT TO FIX THE TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS POINTED OUT BY MR. WILLIAMS AND CHANGE THE TITLE OF SECTION 5 TO “REPLANTING. RECOMMENDED REPLANTING RATIOS.” MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Action on Amendment #1 MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER MESAROS VOTING NO. Action on Main Motion as amended MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 13. PUBLIC COMMENT AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE 2015 PROPOSED CITY BUDGET Mayor Earling opened the opportunity for public comment. Kurt Greiner, Edmonds, referred to two funding proposals in the Council’s allocation of $250,000, $10,000 for a peer review and $90,000 for a train trench study. He urged the Council not to approve the $10,000 peer review because a firm could not be asked to compare the current $10,000 study because it was not complete. He referred to the Tetra Tech Report which states until the design is complete there are a myriad unknown conditions that cannot be specifically accounted for in the construction cost estimate. He relayed an email from Phil Lovell that the estimate in the Tetra Tech report can be judged as inadequate in depth but further refinement and/or accuracy of any estimate at this point would be pointless without further design development. After reviewing the Tetra Tech report and applying standards he was familiar with, he emailed the Council an outline of other ways of doing this that are less expensive, more environmental and will save time. Until those are properly identified, he did not see how a peer review could be done. He urged the Council to approve the $90,000 study to obtain that information so that a peer review can be conducted. With regard to alternatives such as moving the ferry terminal, he pointed out ferries cannot dock there in bad weather, the site is not ready and the funds are not available. With regard to an overpass, a study was completed in 2012. He concluded the City needed to consider alternatives; it is good business as well as required by NEPA. Hearing no further comment, Mayor Earling closed the opportunity for public comment. Councilmember Petso explained although she initially requested $10,000 for a peer review, she withdrew that request when a consensus emerged that it was not really a study worthy of being peer reviewed. Her current proposal is $90,000 for a preliminary study and $10,000 for a peer review of that preliminary study. Finance Director Scott James reviewed the Council’s list of changes Proposal # Description Cash Increase (Decrease) 1 Veterans Park Design ($10,000) 2 Train Trench Study ($90,000) & Peer Review ($10,000) ($100,000) Packet Page 26 of 433 3 Highway 99 Study and Planning ($100,000) 4 Planned Action EIS (2015 Phase 1 $75,000, 2016 Phase 2 $75,000) ($75,000) 5 Building & Facility Maintenance Needs Study ($20,000) Subtotal of Allocations ($305,000) Amount Requests Exceed Balance to Allocate ($55,000) Due to the late hour, Mayor Earling suggested deferring further discussion to next week. Council President Buckshnis commented although she was ready to vote on the budget now, she encouraged Councilmembers to provide questions/concerns/changes to staff so the process can move forward during future budget discussions. Councilmember Petso advised in addition to one-time expenditures the Council has allocated from the $250,000, she is considering funding Police Department Decision Package 3, ongoing cost to restore the Crime Prevention Officer. She will forward Councilmembers the original decision package which was pulled when the Fire District 1 bill was received. To help cover the cost, she is reviewing the budget for ongoing expenditures that could be convert to onetime items; one potential source is converting the Finance Department Intern to a one-time expenditure rather than ongoing. Mr. James advised he will post the latest revisions to the 2015 preliminary budget book changes and the Council allocation of the $250,000 to the City’s website tomorrow. 14. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported the Swedish-Edmonds auction last Friday raised $708,000. 15. COUNCIL COMMENTS - None 16. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 17. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 18. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:29 p.m. Packet Page 27 of 433 AM-7312 5. B. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:Consent Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Nori Jacobson Department:Finance Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #211553 through #211670 dated November 20, 2014 for $835,009.31 (reissued check #211583 $33.75). Approval of payroll direct deposit and checks #61283 though #61292 and #61382 for $467,030.85, benefit checks #61293 through #61298 and wire payments of $447,898.00 for the pay period November 1, 2014 to November 15, 2014. Approval of payments for Holiday buy back (check #61299 though #61348) for Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees and Law Enforcement Support Service Employees in the amount of $125,150.61 and Kelly buy back (check #61349 through #61381) for Law Enforcement Commissioned Employees in the amount of $36,909.77 per union contracts. Recommendation Approval of claim, payroll and benefit direct deposit, checks and wire payments. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year:2014 Revenue: Expenditure:1,911,998.54 Fiscal Impact: Claims $835,009.31 Packet Page 28 of 433 Claims $835,009.31 Claims reissued check #211583 $33.75 Payroll Employee checks and direct deposit $467,030.85 Payroll Benefit checks and wire payments $447,898.00 Holiday buy back $125,150.61 Kelly buy back $36,909.77 Total Payroll $1,076,989.23 Attachments Claim checks 11-20-14 Project Numbers 11-20-14 Payroll Summary 11-15-14 Payroll Summary 11-15-14a Payroll Benefit 11-15-14 Holiday buy back Kelly day Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Scott James 11/20/2014 03:15 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 11/20/2014 03:16 PM Mayor Dave Earling 11/21/2014 09:05 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/21/2014 09:10 AM Form Started By: Nori Jacobson Started On: 11/20/2014 11:35 AM Final Approval Date: 11/21/2014 Packet Page 29 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211553 11/20/2014 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 342601 WWTP - PEST CONTROL November Service 423.000.76.535.80.41.23 73.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.23 6.94 Total :79.94 211554 11/20/2014 068657 ACCOUNTEMPS 41608114 TEMPORARY HELP FINANCE DEPT WEEK ENDING Temporary help week ending 10/31/14 - C 001.000.31.514.23.41.00 1,500.75 Total :1,500.75 211555 11/20/2014 069156 ADVISARTS INC 11/4/14 BACH CCP COMMUNITY CULTURAL PLAN CONSULTATION COMMUNITY CULTURAL PLAN CONSULTATION 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 375.00 Total :375.00 211556 11/20/2014 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 9587 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 109,023.99 Total :109,023.99 211557 11/20/2014 001375 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 035353-14105 APA Membership Washington Chapter & APA Membership Washington Chapter & 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 613.00 Rob Chave APA membership, Washington040706-14105 Rob Chave APA membership, Washington 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 500.00 Total :1,113.00 211558 11/20/2014 064335 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INC ZI87 WWTP - MONTHLY NPDES monthly NPDES testing 423.000.76.535.80.41.31 165.00 Total :165.00 211559 11/20/2014 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1987648800 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 1Page: Packet Page 30 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211559 11/20/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 14.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.41 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987653089 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987653090 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 2Page: Packet Page 31 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211559 11/20/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987653091 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.28 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.59 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987660361 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 14.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.41 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987664673 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 3Page: Packet Page 32 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211559 11/20/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987664674 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987664675 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.28 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.59 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987671967 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 17.82 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.69 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987676291 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 4Page: Packet Page 33 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211559 11/20/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987676292 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 5.00 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 0.48 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 0.47 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987676293 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 5Page: Packet Page 34 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211559 11/20/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 5.28 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.59 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 0.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987683412 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 16.20 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.54 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS1987687710 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 1.09 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 4.16 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 4.15 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.41.00 0.10 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 0.40 9.5% Sales Tax 6Page: Packet Page 35 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211559 11/20/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.38 PUBLIC WORKS OMC LOBBY MATS 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 4.16 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS1987687711 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 11.05 STREET/STORM DIVISION UNIFORMS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 11.04 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 1.05 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 1.05 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS & MATS1987687712 FLEET DIVISION UNIFORMS 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 15.35 FLEET DIVISION MATS 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 7.59 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.24.00 1.46 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.41.00 0.72 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS1987694882 FACILITIES DIVISION UNIFORMS 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 16.20 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.24.00 1.54 WWTP - UNIFORMS, MATS & TOWELS1987717958 uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 3.80 mats & towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 74.16 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.36 9.5% Sales Tax 7Page: Packet Page 36 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211559 11/20/2014 (Continued)069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 7.05 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1987717959 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 34.47 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 3.27 Total :430.79 211560 11/20/2014 075066 BEST PLUMBING GROUP LLC BLD20141087 Refund give for fixtures already Refund give for fixtures already 001.000.257.620 220.00 Total :220.00 211561 11/20/2014 002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP 101023 INV#101023 - EDMONDS PD - SACKVILLE WOOL BASEBALL HAT W/VELCRO 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 11.95 EMBROIDER EDMONDS POLICE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 2.09 INV#103783- EDMONDS PD-BORST & NAUGHIAN103783 TORRENT BOOTS -BORST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 199.95 BELT - BORST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 25.95 DUTY BELT - BORST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 49.95 TORRENT BOOTS - NAUGHIAN 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 199.95 BELT - NAUGHIAN 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 25.95 DUTY BELT - NAUGHIAN 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 64.95 SPORTS HAND TRAINER-BORST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.95 8Page: Packet Page 37 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211561 11/20/2014 (Continued)002500 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS & EQUIP SPORTS HAND TRAINIER-NAUGHIAN 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 6.95 CAP COVER - BORST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 7.95 CAP COVER - NAUGHIAN 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 7.95 PICKET TRAFFIC TEMPLATE 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 15.90 PICKETT TRAFFIC TEMPLATE - STOCK 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 7.95 PICKET TRAFFIC TEMPLATE - STOCK 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 7.95 FLASHLIGHT RING/BW - BORST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.50 FLASHLIGHT RING/BW - NAUGHIAN 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 10.50 RADIO HOLDER/BW/UNIVERSAL 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 45.00 BELT KEEPERS - BORST 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 14.95 BELT KEEPERS - NAUGHIAN 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 14.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 68.80 INV#99037-01 - EDMONDS PD - STOCK99037-01 M-4 MACE HOLDER/W/HIDDEN SNAP 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 83.32 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 7.92 Total :908.28 211562 11/20/2014 074849 BOMAR, RICK 103114 TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 001.000.23.523.30.43.00 33.30 9Page: Packet Page 38 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :33.3021156211/20/2014 074849 074849 BOMAR, RICK 211563 11/20/2014 067391 BRAT WEAR 12395 INV#12395 - EDMONDS PD - SUTTON S/S SHIRT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 59.00 NAME TAG (EMBROIDERED) 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 8.00 UNIFORM PANTS W/NINJA POCKETS 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 90.00 UNIFORM PANTS (SUMMER) 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 138.00 DUTY JACKET W/FLEECE LINER 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 375.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 63.65 INV#12461 - EDMONDS PD - SUTTON12461 ALL SEASON JUMPSUIT 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 515.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.24.00 48.93 Total :1,297.58 211564 11/20/2014 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 19191 PILATES YOGA F 19191 PILATES YOGA FUSION INSTRUCTOR FEE 19191 PILATES YOGA FUSION INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 170.10 19203 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE19203 YOGA 19203 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 313.47 19206 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE19206 YOGA 19206 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 174.15 19209 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE19209 YOGA 19209 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 383.40 19212 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE19212 YOGA 19212 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 10Page: Packet Page 39 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211564 11/20/2014 (Continued)072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 432.00 19215 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE19215 YOGA 19215 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 540.00 19218 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE19218 YOGA 19218 YOGA INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 194.40 Total :2,207.52 211565 11/20/2014 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 14349581 INV#14349581 CUST#572105 - EDMONDS PD B/W METER USE 9/30-10/31/14 (4) 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 121.37 COLOR METER USE 9/30-10/31/14 (2) 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 111.74 MONTHLY COPY RENTAL (4) 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 581.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 77.40 CITY CLERK'S COPIER LEASE14349584 Lease City Clerk's Copier 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 466.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 44.36 RECEPTIONIST DESK COPIER LEASE14349584 Recept. desk copier lease 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 20.11 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 1.91 C/A 572105 CONTRACT# 001-0572105-00414355634 Finance dept copier contract charge 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 249.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.45.00 23.75 PARKS COPIER IRC5051 CONTRACT 0370614355638 PARKS COPIER IRC5051 CONTRACT 03706 11Page: Packet Page 40 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211565 11/20/2014 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 36.16 Total :1,735.36 211566 11/20/2014 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 19091 ADVENTURES IN 19091 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING INSTRUCTOR F 19091 ADVENTURES IN DRAWING INSTRUCTOR 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 363.00 19093 CUSTOM ART HOLIDAY CARDS INSTRUCTO19093 CUSTOM ART 19093 CUSTOM ART HOLIDAY CARDS 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 70.00 Total :433.00 211567 11/20/2014 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC QL86462 HPE 5 yr NBD COLLAB DL38X maintenance HPE 5 yr NBD COLLAB DL38X maintenance 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 1,150.40 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 109.29 CISCO UCS QUICK START W/VMWARE JUMPSTARTSE1400384 Cisco UCS Quick Start w/VMware 001.000.31.518.87.41.00 9,457.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.87.41.00 898.46 Total :11,615.65 211568 11/20/2014 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY213724 WWTP - SUPPLIES, MECHANICAL argon and aluminum 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 69.36 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 6.60 Total :75.96 211569 11/20/2014 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS E3GA.ROW ENG20140526 E3GA.ROW PERMIT ENG20140526 E3GA.ROW Permit ENG20140526 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 295.00 Total :295.00 211570 11/20/2014 004095 COASTWIDE LABS GW2718270 Fac Maint - TT, Towels, Liners 12Page: Packet Page 41 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211570 11/20/2014 (Continued)004095 COASTWIDE LABS Fac Maint - TT, Towels, Liners 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 313.88 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 29.82 Fac Maint - Versamatic Belt Drive andNW2714270-1 Fac Maint - Versamatic Belt Drive and 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 342.02 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 32.49 Fac Maint - Kitchen Towel RollsNW2718270 Fac Maint - Kitchen Towel Rolls 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 115.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.95 Total :844.41 211571 11/20/2014 064369 CODE PUBLISHING CO 48089 CITY CODE UPDATES Supplement updates 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 766.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 72.77 Total :838.77 211572 11/20/2014 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3294181 E7AC.RFQ FOR CONST. ENG., INSPECTION & M E7AC.RFQ for Const. Eng., Inspection & 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 425.60 Total :425.60 211573 11/20/2014 068190 DATEC INC 20441 FIREWALL SUBSCRIPTION, SUPPORT RENEWAL Premium support renewal PA-500, Threat 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 3,456.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 328.32 Total :3,784.32 13Page: Packet Page 42 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211574 11/20/2014 073823 DAVID EVANS & ASSOC INC 348770 E1CA.SERVICES THRU 9/13/14 E1CA.Services thru 9/13/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 2,524.41 E1CA.Services thru 9/13/14 112.200.68.595.20.61.00 4,785.27 Total :7,309.68 211575 11/20/2014 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 3972 Cert #3972 Renewal for J Waite Cert #3972 Renewal for J Waite 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 30.00 Total :30.00 211576 11/20/2014 073757 DEX MEDIA WEST INC 651150804 CEMETERY ADVERTISING CEMETERY ADVERTISING 130.000.64.536.20.44.00 63.38 Total :63.38 211577 11/20/2014 068654 DIJULIO DISPLAYS INC 7647 HOLIDAY LIGHTS 125 100 LIGHT MINI LIGHT SETS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 1,087.50 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 103.31 Total :1,190.81 211578 11/20/2014 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 14-3500 MINUTE TAKING 11/10 Council Minutes 001.000.25.514.30.41.00 336.60 Total :336.60 211579 11/20/2014 061384 DRIFTWOOD PLAYERS DRIFTWOOD TOURISM DRIFTWOOD TOURISM PROMO DRIFTWOOD TOURISM PROMO 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 2,000.00 Total :2,000.00 211580 11/20/2014 007253 DUNN LUMBER 2863805 CEMETERY MAINT SUPPLIES PLYWOOD SHEATHING 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 429.00 14Page: Packet Page 43 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211580 11/20/2014 (Continued)007253 DUNN LUMBER 9.5% Sales Tax 130.000.64.536.50.31.00 40.76 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES 8TH & ALDER PATHWAY2871283 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 211.28 PRESSURE TREATED LANDSCAPE TIMBERS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 2,224.00 Total :2,905.04 211581 11/20/2014 070884 EARTHWORK ENTERPRISES INC E4JA.Pmt 3 E4JA.PMT 3 THRU 10/24/14 E4JA.Pmt 3 thru 10/24/14 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 244,162.57 Total :244,162.57 211582 11/20/2014 074302 EDMONDS HARDWARE & PAINT LLC 000440 Facility Maint - Plaza - Paint Supplies Facility Maint - Plaza - Paint Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 43.23 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 4.11 Total :47.34 211583 11/20/2014 069523 EDMONDS P&R YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP BILLING 060414 REFUND UNUSED MONITOR FEE ELISABETH REFUND UNUSED MONITOR FEE ELISABETH 001.000.239.200 3.75 REFUND UNUSED MONITOR FEE KRISTIN HULLHULL 11052013 REFUND UNUSED MONITOR FEE KRISTIN HULL 001.000.239.200 22.50 RETURNING CREDIT ON ACCOUNT AMY WALTERWALTER 02122014 RETURNING CREDIT ON ACCOUNT AMY WALTER 001.000.239.200 7.50 Total :33.75 211584 11/20/2014 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 106214 MAINT ON COPIER MAINT ON COPIER 001.000.23.523.30.45.00 165.40 15Page: Packet Page 44 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211584 11/20/2014 (Continued)008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES Meter charges for Planning Dept. C1030.106393 Meter charges for Planning Dept. C1030. 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 22.44 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 2.13 Meter charges for Bldg. Div. C1030.106394 1 Meter charges for Bldg. Div. C1030. 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 35.41 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 3.36 WWTP - OFFICE MACHINE USE AND MAINTENANC106648 monthly metered copies 423.000.76.535.80.45.41 309.13 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.45.41 29.37 Total :567.24 211585 11/20/2014 075086 ESTATE OF WILLIAM SCHUH 2-18200 #630756 UTILITY REFUND DUE #630756 Utility refund due to estimated 411.000.233.000 83.76 Total :83.76 211586 11/20/2014 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH597050 Catherine Cobb/PLN20140050 Legal ads. Catherine Cobb/PLN20140050 Legal ads. 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 56.76 E7AC.RFQ FOR CONST. ENG, INSPECTION & MAEDH598121 E7AC.RFQ for Const. Eng., Inspection & 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 199.52 Animal Control/AMD20140009 legal ads.EDH598158 Animal Control/AMD20140009 legal ads. 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 51.60 Amend Chap 17.35, AnimalEDH598606 Amend Chap 17.35, Animal 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 53.32 16Page: Packet Page 45 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :361.2021158611/20/2014 009350 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 211587 11/20/2014 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU33926 Water - Supplies Water - Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 31.11 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2.96 Total :34.07 211588 11/20/2014 075015 FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING 5609041410 INV 5609041410 EDMONDS PD PRE-EMPLOY CREDIT CHECK 09/14 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 9.00 Total :9.00 211589 11/20/2014 072174 FRIENDS OF FRANK DEMIERO 11/13 TOURISM PROMO 11/13 FRIENDS OF FRANK TOURISM PROMO 11/13 FRIENDS OF FRANK TOURISM PROMO 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 2,000.00 Total :2,000.00 211590 11/20/2014 011900 FRONTIER 206-188-0247 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY ACCOUNT TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY ACCOUNT 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 252.36 TELEMETRY MASTER SUMMARY ACCOUNT 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 252.36 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE253-011-1177 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 5.48 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 20.81 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 20.81 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 20.81 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 20.81 PUBLIC WORKS OMC RADIO LINE TO FIVE 17Page: Packet Page 46 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211590 11/20/2014 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 20.78 WWTP AFTER HOUR BUSINESS LINE425-712-0423 WWTP AFTER HOUR BUSINESS LINE 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 68.40 CLUBHOUSE ALARM LINES 6801 MEADOWDALE RD425-745-4313 CLUBHOUSE FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 126.76 LIFT STATION #8 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINES425-774-1031 LIFT STATION #8 TWO VOICE GRADE SPECIAL 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 48.69 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION425-775-1344 RANGER 425-775-1344 RANGER STATION 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 63.04 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE425-775-7865 UTILITY BILLING RADIO LINE TO FIVE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 63.04 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE425-776-1281 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR PHONE LINE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 50.45 LIFT STATION #7 VG SPECIAL ACCESS LINE425-776-2742 LIFT STATION #7 V/G SPECIAL ACCESS LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 27.87 425-776-5316 CITY PARK425-776-5316 CITY PK 425-776-5316 CITY PARK 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 93.67 Total :1,156.14 211591 11/20/2014 074358 GEO-TEST SERVICES 30927 E3GA.SERVICES THRU OCTOBER 2014 SITE #3 E3GA.Services thru October 2014 Site #3 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 3,665.00 E3GA.SERVICES THRU OCTOBER 2014 SITE #530929 E3GA.Services thru October 2014 Site #5 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 1,145.00 E2FB & E4FA.SERVICES THRU OCTOBER 201430967 E2FB.Services thru October 2014 18Page: Packet Page 47 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211591 11/20/2014 (Continued)074358 GEO-TEST SERVICES 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 529.14 E4FA.Services thru October 2014 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 1,027.16 Total :6,366.30 211592 11/20/2014 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 120429 Unit 28 - Tire Inventory Unit 28 - Tire Inventory 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 219.88 State Tire Fee 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 2.00 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 20.89 Unit 324 - Tire Inventory120443 Unit 324 - Tire Inventory 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 643.12 State Tire Fee 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 4.00 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.34.30 61.10 Unit EQ93PO - Tires120471 Unit EQ93PO - Tires 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 252.90 State Tire Fee 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 2.00 9.5% Sales Tax 511.100.77.594.48.64.00 24.03 Total :1,229.92 211593 11/20/2014 075082 GOUDA INCORPORATED BID-41964 FINAL PAYMENT FOR UMBRELLAS Final payment for BID umbrellas 627.000.61.558.70.31.00 2,830.83 Total :2,830.83 211594 11/20/2014 012199 GRAINGER 9586890114 Fac Maint - Inspection Mirrors Fac Maint - Inspection Mirrors 19Page: Packet Page 48 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211594 11/20/2014 (Continued)012199 GRAINGER 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 71.48 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 6.79 Museum - Seal Bearing Assembly9587762015 Museum - Seal Bearing Assembly 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 347.40 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 33.01 Total :458.68 211595 11/20/2014 012355 GRCC/BAT BAT Cert Renewals BAT Cert Renewal - J Waite, L McMurphy BAT Cert Renewal - J Waite, L McMurphy 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 84.00 Total :84.00 211596 11/20/2014 069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 10066/3 Water Supplies Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 21.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2.00 Water - 3" Meter Replacement -152596/1 Water - 3" Meter Replacement - 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 130.96 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 26.59 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 14.97 Water Parts Installed for Meter Repair152597/1 Water Parts Installed for Meter Repair 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2,467.36 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 234.40 Water Inventory - W-CLMPCI-06-027152598/1 Water Inventory - W-CLMPCI-06-027 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 245.13 20Page: Packet Page 49 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211596 11/20/2014 (Continued)069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1,366.95 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 23.29 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 129.86 Water Supplies Installed for Meter152985/1 Water Supplies Installed for Meter 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 148.16 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 14.08 Water Supplies153037/1 Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 3,310.85 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 314.53 Water Supplies153038/1 Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 280.10 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 26.61 Water Inventory - W-SETTERCK-0.75-012153039/1 Water Inventory - W-SETTERCK-0.75-012 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 1,385.52 Water Supplies - 6 Resetters 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 596.40 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.34.20 131.62 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 56.66 Water Supplies153602/1 Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1,166.12 9.5% Sales Tax 21Page: Packet Page 50 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211596 11/20/2014 (Continued)069733 H B JAEGER COMPANY LLC 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 110.78 Water Supplies153603/1 Water Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 269.60 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 25.61 Total :12,499.15 211597 11/20/2014 073533 H2NATION PUBLISHING INC 1455 WEBSITE REDEVELOPMENT Website rebuild 33% complete. 001.000.61.558.70.41.00 5,000.00 Website rebuild 33% complete 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 2,800.00 Total :7,800.00 211598 11/20/2014 070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 114619 TIRE CREDIT MEMO Credit memo for tire (See WO Copy for 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 -219.99 Unit 405 - Supplies117091 Unit 405 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 322.75 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 30.67 Unit 405 - Supplies117604 Unit 405 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 27.96 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.66 Unit 405 - Parts117851 Unit 405 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 461.88 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 43.88 Unit 405 - Supplies117854 Unit 405 - Supplies 22Page: Packet Page 51 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211598 11/20/2014 (Continued)070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.99 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.57 Unit 405 - Supplies118928 Unit 405 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 7.99 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.76 Unit 582 - Supplies118931 Unit 582 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 49.97 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.75 Unit 405 - Return118932 Unit 405 - Return 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -109.99 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -10.45 Unit 405 - Clutch Parts118938 Unit 405 - Clutch Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 236.97 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 22.51 Unit 405 - Supplies118940 Unit 405 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 104.93 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.97 Unit 203 - Supplies119081 Unit 203 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 37.99 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.61 Unit 582 - Supplies119083 23Page: Packet Page 52 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211598 11/20/2014 (Continued)070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE Unit 582 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 37.99 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.61 Unit 203 - Supplies119765 Unit 203 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 35.99 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.42 Unit 405 - Supplies121325 Unit 405 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 27.99 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.66 Unit 203 - Parts121713 Unit 203 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 309.91 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 29.44 Unit 582 - Supplies121840 Unit 582 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.94 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.13 Unit 582 - Parts122957 Unit 582 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 465.69 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 44.26 Unit 405 - Clutch Parts123020 Unit 405 - Clutch Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 469.93 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 45.64 24Page: Packet Page 53 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211598 11/20/2014 (Continued)070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE Unit 405 - Parts123682 Unit 405 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 37.96 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.60 Unit 582 - Remaining Supplies124627 Unit 582 - Remaining Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 57.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.47 Unit 203 - Parts124635 Unit 203 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 5.99 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.57 Unit 582 - Parts125158 Unit 582 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 35.97 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.42 Unit 409 Return126139 Unit 409 Return 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -14.99 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -1.42 Unit 582 - Parts126140 Unit 582 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 13.98 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.32 Unit 582 - Parts126141 Unit 582 - Parts 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 39.98 9.5% Sales Tax 25Page: Packet Page 54 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211598 11/20/2014 (Continued)070515 HARLEY DAVIDSON OF SEATTLE 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.80 Fleet Return126142 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -2.09 Fleet Return 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 -21.99 Unit 457 - Replace Rear Tire14417 Unit 457 - Replace Rear Tire 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 111.30 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 10.58 Total :2,815.93 211599 11/20/2014 074814 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES INC 26465 E2AC.SERVICES THRU 10/31/14 E2AC.Services thru 10/31/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 187.56 Total :187.56 211600 11/20/2014 074746 HIGUCHI, ROD 19261 UKELELE 19261 UKELELE INSTRUCTOR FEE 19261 UKELELE INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 231.00 Total :231.00 211602 11/20/2014 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1035082 Parks - Supplies Parks - Supplies 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 198.71 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 18.88 Fac Maint Unit 5 - Supplies1040232 Fac Maint Unit 5 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 22.11 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.10 Traffic - Supplies1593387 Traffic - Supplies 26Page: Packet Page 55 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211602 11/20/2014 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 17.93 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1.70 Sr Center - Supplies2034967 Sr Center - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.96 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.14 Fac Maint - Supplies2040127 Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 14.55 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.38 Yost Pool - Supplies2040132 Yost Pool - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 162.82 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 15.47 Yost Pool - Supplies2040184 Yost Pool - Supplies 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 71.32 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.78 Fac Maint - Unit 26 - Supplies2041360 Fac Maint - Unit 26 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12.31 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.17 City Hall - Lav Fan2086766 City Hall - Lav Fan 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 24.51 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.33 Courts - Supplies2261136 27Page: Packet Page 56 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211602 11/20/2014 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Courts - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.65 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.73 FAC - Step Ladder3033646 FAC - Step Ladder 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 148.00 FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 14.06 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.28 Fac Maint - Unit 5 Replacement Tools3034762 Fac Maint - Unit 5 Replacement Tools 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 58.91 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 5.60 Parks - Plumbing Parts3072177 Parks - Plumbing Parts 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 20.51 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 1.95 FAC - Keys and Lock3091416 FAC - Keys and Lock 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.94 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.32 City Hall - Supplies3580007 City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.95 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.33 Fac Maint Unit 5 - Replacement Tools4035874 28Page: Packet Page 57 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211602 11/20/2014 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Fac Maint Unit 5 - Replacement Tools 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 69.23 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 6.58 PS - Boiler Supplies4044335 PS - Boiler Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.44 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.99 City Hall - Supplies4084291 City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.19 FAC - Toilet and Faucet4095051 FAC - Toilet and Faucet 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 118.44 PW - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 24.39 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 13.57 PW - Kitchen Faucet4095092 PW - Kitchen Faucet 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 54.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 5.13 FAC Return4231711 FAC Return 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 -54.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 -5.12 City Park Maint - Supplies5040901 City Park Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 28.93 29Page: Packet Page 58 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211602 11/20/2014 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.75 Fac Maint Unit 5 Replacement Tools5044242 Fac Maint Unit 5 Replacement Tools 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 25.73 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 2.44 Parks - Supplies5092283 Parks - Supplies 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 74.83 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.11 Storm - Flex CPLG5261192 Storm - Flex CPLG 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 6.42 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 0.61 Fac Maint - Supplies5565450 Fac Maint - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.38 City Hall - Supplies563629 City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.58 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.34 FAC - Roof Supplies6010023 FAC - Roof Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 122.89 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.67 Fac Maint Shop Supplies6034510 Fac Maint Shop Supplies 30Page: Packet Page 59 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211602 11/20/2014 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 19.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.90 Roadway - Supplies6034552 Roadway - Supplies 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 27.98 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 2.66 FAC - Supplies6044104 FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 27.21 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.58 Fac Maint - Rotary Tool6070025 Fac Maint - Rotary Tool 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 79.00 FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 37.50 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 7.51 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 3.56 Sewer Supplies6565332 Sewer Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 17.44 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.66 FAC - Roof Supplies7033095 FAC - Roof Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 213.10 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 20.24 FAC - Supplies7034344 FAC - Supplies 31Page: Packet Page 60 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211602 11/20/2014 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 14.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.35 Parks - Supplies8045036 Parks - Supplies 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 68.39 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.50 Water - Supplies85832 Water - Supplies 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 99.66 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.47 Traffic - Supplies for Damaged Mail Box9036465 Traffic - Supplies for Damaged Mail Box 111.000.68.542.68.48.00 23.87 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.68.48.00 2.27 Fac Maint Unit 5 Replacement Tools9040475 Fac Maint Unit 5 Replacement Tools 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 142.91 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.35.00 13.58 Fac Maint Unit 5 - Supplies9041566 Fac Maint Unit 5 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 25.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.47 Fac Maint - Unit 26 - Supplies9041621 Fac Maint - Unit 26 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 23.34 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 2.22 Fac Maint Shop Supplies9044808 32Page: Packet Page 61 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211602 11/20/2014 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES Fac Maint Shop Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 83.89 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 7.97 FAC - Supplies9072711 FAC - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.94 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.13 Parks - Supplies9087179 Parks - Supplies 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 49.76 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.72 Roadway - Supplies9090650 Roadway - Supplies 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 74.94 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 7.12 Library - Sink Hole Cover9573761 Library - Sink Hole Cover 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.61 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 0.82 Total :2,565.29 211603 11/20/2014 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2535718 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 155.59 Drafting table for Jen Machuga -2539049 Drafting table for Jen Machuga - 001.000.62.558.60.35.00 170.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.558.60.35.00 16.15 Misc. office supplies including2539721 33Page: Packet Page 62 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211603 11/20/2014 (Continued)073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED Misc. office supplies including 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 343.11 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 32.61 FILE STORAGE BOXES2540556 Business Source File Storage Boxes - 2 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 71.38 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 6.78 Office supplies2541715 Office supplies 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 211.13 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.31.00 20.06 Misc. office supplies including2541767 Misc. office supplies including 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 615.39 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 58.46 CHAIR FOR DIRECTOR2543514 Office chair for director 001.000.61.557.20.35.00 460.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.35.00 43.70 HP BLACK INKJET CARTRIDGE2543766 HP Black Inkjet cartridge HEWC6602A - 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 17.90 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 1.70 SUPPLIES2543767 SUPPLIES 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 137.62 Total :2,361.58 211604 11/20/2014 071634 INTEGRA TELECOM 12501387 C/A 768328 34Page: Packet Page 63 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211604 11/20/2014 (Continued)071634 INTEGRA TELECOM PR1-1 & 2 City Phone Service 001.000.31.518.88.42.00 902.19 Tourism Toll free lines 877.775.6929; 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 6.46 Econ Devlpmnt Toll free lines 001.000.61.558.70.42.00 6.46 Total :915.11 211605 11/20/2014 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 748827 PARKS MAINT SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL TAPE, CABLE TIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 50.65 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.81 Total :55.46 211606 11/20/2014 072059 LEE, NICOLE 1335 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 142.56 Total :142.56 211607 11/20/2014 018950 LYNNWOOD AUTO PARTS INC 710823 Fleet Shop Supplies Fleet Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 35.12 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 3.34 Fleet Shop Returns710877 Fleet Shop Returns 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 -13.90 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 -1.32 Total :23.24 211608 11/20/2014 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 1531 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 88.32 35Page: Packet Page 64 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211608 11/20/2014 (Continued)069362 MARSHALL, CITA INTERPRETER FEE1532 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 88.32 INTERPRETER FEE1533 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 88.32 INTERPRETER FEE1534 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 88.32 INTERPRETER FEE1536 INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 88.32 Total :441.60 211609 11/20/2014 074099 MARTIN, GARY 10/23 YOGA INSTRUCT 10/23 YOGA INSTRUCTOR 10/23 YOGA INSTRUCTOR 001.000.64.575.54.41.00 48.60 Total :48.60 211610 11/20/2014 075083 MARY JEFFREY 5-02220 #40139261-803-TJ2 UTILITY REFUND #40139261-803-TJ2 Utility refund due to 411.000.233.000 145.95 Total :145.95 211611 11/20/2014 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 16712790 WWTP - SUPPLIES, MECHANICAL jacketing for pipe insulation 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 254.10 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 29.36 Total :283.46 211612 11/20/2014 075047 NIEMI, KIRK 091914 JUROR JUROR 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 36Page: Packet Page 65 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211613 11/20/2014 068451 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 1030424 Unit 22 - Air Toggle Switch Unit 22 - Air Toggle Switch 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 19.95 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.76 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.73 Total :31.44 211614 11/20/2014 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 56745 WWTP - SODIUM BISULFITE sodium bisulfite 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 773.50 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 73.48 Total :846.98 211615 11/20/2014 070045 NORTHUP GROUP 3075 INV 3075 EDMONDS PD - PRE-EMPLOY HWANG PRE-EMPLOY EXAM - HWANG 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 340.00 Total :340.00 211616 11/20/2014 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 2-1064809 CIVIC FIELD HONEY BUCKET CIVIC FIELD HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 115.65 Total :115.65 211617 11/20/2014 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 522 Planning Board minutes on 11/12/14. Planning Board minutes on 11/12/14. 001.000.62.558.60.44.00 280.50 Total :280.50 211618 11/20/2014 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 213403 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 73.77 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 7.01 37Page: Packet Page 66 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211618 11/20/2014 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC INV#229692 ACCT#520437 250POL EDMONDS P229692 CD/DVD HOLDERS 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 21.80 SHAPRIE ACCENT PENS-YELLOW 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 9.58 INDUSTRIAL BLACK MARKERS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.15 BLACK RETRACTABLE PENS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 70.92 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.21.31.00 2.07 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 8.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES250191 Office Supplies 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 50.49 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 4.79 520437 PARKS & REC OFFICE SUPPLIES297723 OFFICE SUPPLIES: STENO BOOKS, BALL 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 22.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 2.18 520437 PARKS & REC OFFICE SUPPLIES345824 OFFICE SUPPLIES: INK ROLL CALCULATOR, 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 12.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 1.17 Total :297.78 211619 11/20/2014 070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER October, 2014 COURT, BLDG CODE & JIS TRANSMITTAL Emergency Medical Services & Trauma 001.000.237.120 1,174.33 PSEA 1, 2 & 3 Account 001.000.237.130 24,983.05 38Page: Packet Page 67 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211619 11/20/2014 (Continued)070166 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER Building Code Fee Account 001.000.237.150 189.00 State Patrol Death Investigation 001.000.237.330 97.57 Judicial Information Systems Account 001.000.237.180 4,254.96 School Zone Safety Account 001.000.237.200 55.29 Washington Auto Theft Prevention 001.000.237.250 2,311.77 Traumatic Brain Injury 001.000.237.260 429.40 Accessible Communities Acct 001.000.237.290 73.32 Multi-Model Transportation 001.000.237.300 73.34 Hwy Safety Acct 001.000.237.320 154.83 Crime Lab Blood Breath Analysis 001.000.237.170 75.21 WSP Hwy Acct 001.000.237.340 553.50 Total :34,425.57 211620 11/20/2014 074545 OLDS-OLYMPIC INC 000511-1430401 FS 20 - Diesel 75.3 Gal FS 20 - Diesel 75.3 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.10 261.90 Total :261.90 211621 11/20/2014 075060 O'NEILL, CAITLIN 11/13 PRESCHOOL SUB 11/13 PRESCHOOL SUB 11/13 PRESCHOOL SUB 001.000.64.575.56.41.00 40.00 Total :40.00 211622 11/20/2014 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00073476 Unit 106 - Hose End Weld 39Page: Packet Page 68 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211622 11/20/2014 (Continued)002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY Unit 106 - Hose End Weld 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 321.04 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 31.21 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 33.47 Total :385.72 211623 11/20/2014 065051 PARAMETRIX INC 18-82083 WWTP - PLC & SCADA SYSTEM UPGRADE phase 02, task 01 - plc-101. phase 03, 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 78,196.49 WWTP - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, SUPPORT18-82084 Support and system programming 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 147.80 Total :78,344.29 211624 11/20/2014 074614 PENSER NORTH AMERICA 38887 Workers Comp. Claims Management- 3rd Workers Comp. Claims Management- 3rd 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 3,884.66 Total :3,884.66 211625 11/20/2014 063951 PERTEET ENGINEERING INC 20110010.000-38 E7AC.SERVICES THRU 10/26/14 E7AC.Design Services thru 10/26/14 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 2,021.00 E7AC.ROW Services thru 10/26/14 112.200.68.595.20.61.00 22,010.41 Total :24,031.41 211626 11/20/2014 008350 PETTY CASH PARKS PETTY CASH PATTY STEELE-SMITH: BARTELLS: HAIR TIES PATTY STEELE-SMITH: BARTELLS: HAIR TIES 001.000.64.575.55.31.00 8.63 RACHEL SHIELDS: TRADER JOE'S CAMP CRAFT 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 14.49 PATTY STEELE-SMITH: THE WOODEN SPOON: 001.000.64.575.55.31.00 24.04 40Page: Packet Page 69 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211626 11/20/2014 (Continued)008350 PETTY CASH RACHEL SHIELDS: QFC: SUGAR, LEMON 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 6.30 MICHELLE PARKER: MICHAELS: MASON JARS 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 8.67 MICHELLE PARKER: HOBBY LOBBY: FELT, 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 6.33 RENEE MCRAE: QFC: SIMPLE GREEN FOR 001.000.64.575.54.31.00 5.65 PATTY STEELE-SMITH: DISPLAY & COSTUME: 001.000.64.575.55.31.00 35.88 Total :109.99 211627 11/20/2014 064552 PITNEY BOWES 9607730-NV14 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE Lease 10/30 to 11/30 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 718.60 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 68.26 Total :786.86 211628 11/20/2014 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC F500502 FS16 - Supplies FS16 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 387.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 36.77 FS 20 - SuppliesF506351 FS 20 - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 398.42 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 37.85 Total :860.04 211629 11/20/2014 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 03870 PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR CITY PORT RIGHT-OF-WAY LEASE FOR CITY 422.000.72.531.90.51.00 2,626.56 41Page: Packet Page 70 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :2,626.5621162911/20/2014 029117 029117 PORT OF EDMONDS 211630 11/20/2014 064088 PROTECTION ONE 31146525 ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL ALARM MONITORING CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 46.89 Total :46.89 211631 11/20/2014 070809 PUGET SOUND EXECUTIVE 14-0847 COURT SECURITY COURT SECURITY 001.000.23.512.50.41.00 3,453.75 Total :3,453.75 211632 11/20/2014 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 00000150377 MONUMENT DEYOUNG DEYOUNG: SIERRA WHITE, INSCRIPTION, SET 130.000.64.536.20.34.00 958.00 Total :958.00 211633 11/20/2014 075084 RANDALL & MARGARET YAMANAKA 7-04500 #40140125-805-SG1 UTILITY REFUND #40140125-805-SG1 Utility refund - 411.000.233.000 87.00 Total :87.00 211634 11/20/2014 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SOUND & DATA 21675 INV#21675 - EDMONDS PD SERVICE CALL IMPOUND LOT 001.000.41.521.11.48.00 193.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.11.48.00 18.34 Total :211.34 211635 11/20/2014 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 147.84 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW3-0197-0800897 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 29.73 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 112.97 42Page: Packet Page 71 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211635 11/20/2014 (Continued)061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 112.97 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 112.97 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 112.97 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 112.99 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW3-0197-0801132 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 158.07 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD3-0197-0829729 CLUBHOUSE 6801 N MEADOWDALE RD 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 69.50 Total :970.01 211636 11/20/2014 006841 RICOH USA INC 5033166567 Meter charges for 10/1-10/31/14 for Meter charges for 10/1-10/31/14 for 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 7.96 Meter charges from 10/1-10/31/14 for5033166894 Meter charges from 10/1-10/31/14 for 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 359.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 34.19 Total :401.95 211637 11/20/2014 070042 RICOH USA INC 93482174 Renewal on reception copier for billing Renewal on reception copier for billing 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 30.66 Renewal for billing period93554717 Renewal for billing period 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 443.48 Renewal for billing period93554719 Renewal for billing period 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 827.00 43Page: Packet Page 72 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :1,301.1421163711/20/2014 070042 070042 RICOH USA INC 211638 11/20/2014 069062 RONGERUDE, JOHN 8077 PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE PUBLIC DEFENDER FEE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 600.00 Total :600.00 211639 11/20/2014 075058 ROWLEY, CHERYL 12/19/14 JUROR JUROR 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 211640 11/20/2014 075050 SAUERLAND, DIANA 091914 JUROR JUROR 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 211641 11/20/2014 075081 SCHUYLER, BEN BID-0000001 PHOTO CONTRACT 85% COMPLETE Photography fees for BID, 85% complete 627.000.61.558.70.41.00 680.00 Total :680.00 211642 11/20/2014 061135 SEAVIEW CHEVROLET 262324 Unit 36 - Seal Unit 36 - Seal 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 29.39 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2.79 Unit 36 - Connectors262512 Unit 36 - Connectors 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 36.11 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.43 Total :71.72 211643 11/20/2014 074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 24765 14108-SUPPORT OCT 2014 WORK COMPLETED 14108-Support October 2014 work 001.000.31.518.88.41.00 2,400.00 44Page: Packet Page 73 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 45 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211643 11/20/2014 (Continued)074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC FIBER ISP REDUNDANCY PROJECT24766 Meeting to discuss fiber ISP redundancy 001.000.31.518.87.41.00 255.00 Total :2,655.00 211644 11/20/2014 074906 SITE WORKSHOP LLC 3547 CITY PARK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERVIC CITY PARK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 1,882.80 Total :1,882.80 211645 11/20/2014 071602 SME SOLUTIONS LLC 177485 WWTP - PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, COMPLIANCE Compliance Testing, Tank Monitor 423.000.76.535.80.41.00 450.00 Total :450.00 211646 11/20/2014 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2004-9683-4 LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD / METER LIFT STATION #10 17526 TALBOT RD / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 136.29 SEAVIEW PARK2007-1403-8 SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 91.98 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH AVE W / MET2007-3984-5 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR 18520 90TH AVE W / 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 31.80 SEAVIEW PARK2011-9708-4 SEAVIEW PARK 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 173.84 100 DAYTON ST2012-3682-5 100 DAYTON ST 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 363.97 STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 150W) / NO2017-1178-5 STREET LIGHTING (183 LIGHTS @ 150W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 1,076.98 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1341 9TH AVE N2022-5062-7 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1341 9TH AVE N 45Page: Packet Page 74 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 46 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211646 11/20/2014 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 30.74 STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ 200W) / NO2025-2918-6 STREET LIGHTING (303 LIGHTS @ 200W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 2,512.01 STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS @ 100W) / N2025-7615-3 STREET LIGHTING (2029 LIGHTS @ 100W) / 111.000.68.542.68.47.00 14,673.76 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / METER 10001353812030-9778-7 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / METER 1000135381 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 28,644.27 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 102044-2584-7 LIFT STATION #2 702 MELODY LN / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 146.93 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METER 102051-8438-5 LIFT STATION #5 432 3RD AVE S / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 53.40 Total :47,935.97 211647 11/20/2014 063941 SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE 2014-2300 CREDITS ON #2014-2300 - SNO CO JAIL 12 WORK RELEASE $26 -MATTESON 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -312.00 31 WORK RELEASE @ $30 -LOUKAS 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -930.00 CR 13 WORK RELEASE 9/14 ABRAHAM 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 -582.01 INV#2014-2300 - EDMONDS PD2014-2300 47.33 BOOKINGS @ $95.94 -10/14 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 4,540.84 475.67 HOUSING @ $66.63 -10/14 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 31,693.89 43 WORK RELEASE @$44.77 - 10/14 001.000.39.523.60.51.00 1,925.11 Total :36,335.83 211648 11/20/2014 070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER DDDED2014 DON'T DRIP & DRIVE EVENTS 46Page: Packet Page 75 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 47 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211648 11/20/2014 (Continued)070167 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TREASURER Don't Drip & Drive Events 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 3,000.00 Total :3,000.00 211649 11/20/2014 072291 SNO-KING COMMUNITY CHORALE 11/17 TOURISM PROMO 11/17 SNO-KING TOURISM PROMO 11/17 SNO-KING TOURISM PROMO 123.000.64.573.20.41.00 1,000.00 Total :1,000.00 211650 11/20/2014 069844 SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PLLC I141115-1 Water Sewer - Tlelmetry System Support Water Sewer - Tlelmetry System Support 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 500.00 Water Sewer - Tlelmetry System Support 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 500.00 Total :1,000.00 211651 11/20/2014 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 104757 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / ASH DISPOSAL WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / ASH DISPOSAL 423.000.76.535.80.47.65 4,435.26 Total :4,435.26 211652 11/20/2014 074570 STULLER, PAM BID -10312014 REIMBURSEMENT FOR MAGNETS AND UMBRELLA S Reimbursement for supplie: umbrellas 627.000.61.558.70.31.00 1,253.83 REIMBURSEMENT FOR 250 UMBRELLASBID-10202014 Reimbursement for purchase of 250 627.000.61.558.70.31.00 2,730.00 Total :3,983.83 211653 11/20/2014 073501 SYNAPTEC SOFTWARE INC 3373 ANNUAL SUPPORT FEE FOR LAWBASE FOR ANNUAL SUPPORT FEE FOR LAWBASE FOR 001.000.23.523.30.49.00 800.00 Total :800.00 211654 11/20/2014 075055 TAYLOR, PATRICIA 091914 JUROR JUROR 47Page: Packet Page 76 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 48 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211654 11/20/2014 (Continued)075055 TAYLOR, PATRICIA 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 211655 11/20/2014 071666 TETRA TECH INC 50856603 E4DA.TRAIN TRENCH CONCEPT.COST ESTIMATE. Train Trench Concept - Cost Estimate~ 001.000.67.532.20.41.00 9,274.20 Total :9,274.20 211656 11/20/2014 071119 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL INST INC 350394 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, MECHANICAL repair parts for the CEM 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 3,476.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 105.74 Total :3,581.74 211657 11/20/2014 068105 THORSON BARNETT & MCDONALD PC 69187 Legal services Legal services 001.000.22.518.10.41.00 155.00 Total :155.00 211658 11/20/2014 038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR 3001387099 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SNO-ISLE LIBRARY ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 961.29 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 91.32 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CIVIC CENTER3001387321 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CIVIC CENTER 250 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 843.30 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 80.11 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER3001387326 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SENIOR CENTER 220 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 242.77 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 23.06 48Page: Packet Page 77 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 49 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211658 11/20/2014 (Continued)038315 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING LIBRARY3001388527 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING SNO-ISLE 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 76.07 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING CIVIC CENTER3001388528 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING CIVIC CENTER 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 49.70 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING SENIOR CENTER3001388542 ELEVATOR PHONE MONITORING SENIOR CENTER 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 14.95 Total :2,382.57 211659 11/20/2014 074669 TIGER DIRECT INC L61368770101 WWTP - SUPPLIES, COMPUTER m/m usb 2.0 universal 423.000.76.535.80.31.42 23.96 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.42 8.98 Total :32.94 211660 11/20/2014 074800 TURNSTYLE INC BID-3261 DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT BID WEBSITE 75% COM Design and development work on EDBID 627.000.61.558.70.41.00 16,586.34 Total :16,586.34 211661 11/20/2014 062693 US BANK 0108 INV#0108 11/06/14 - THOMPSON-EDMONDSPD MAIL PET LICENSES TO PETDATA 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 13.34 2014 DVD CODE REVISER 001.000.41.521.40.31.00 42.71 SMART GEAR FOR MORRISON 001.000.41.521.21.24.00 235.85 Advertising for Parks Maintenance0378 Advertising for Parks Maintenance 001.000.22.518.10.44.00 50.00 Advertsing for Parks Seasonal Laborer 001.000.22.518.10.44.00 50.00 49Page: Packet Page 78 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 50 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211661 11/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK Advertising for RFQ/RFP Municipal Court 001.000.22.518.10.44.00 225.00 Advertising for RFQ Municipal Court 001.000.22.518.10.44.00 50.00 INV#2519 11/06/14 - TRAINING - EDMONDS P2519 MEAL/BACK INVST/HARDWICK 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 8.88 CAR RENTAL/BACK INVST/HARDWICK 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 89.40 MEAL/BACK INVST/HARDWICK 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 6.89 LODGING/BACK INVST/HARDWICK 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 187.58 FUEL /BACK INVST/HARDWICK 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 38.69 MEAL/BACK INVST/HARDWICK 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 51.37 WWTP - SEPTEMBER 2014 CC CHARGES2985 Siemens MarQ21 Handle Insert 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 700.00 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 10.56 GASB SUBSCRIPTION3065 GASB - Governmental Accounting Research 001.000.31.514.23.49.00 445.00 INV#3181 11/06/14 - BARD - EDMONDS PD3181 TLO SEARCHES 09/2014 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 18.25 MINDFLASH-MO FEE FOR ONLINE TRAINING 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 199.00 REG. FIN EXPLOIT ELDERS/MORRISON 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 90.00 REG. DRUG/CR INTERDICTION/CLARK 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 125.00 50Page: Packet Page 79 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 51 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211661 11/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK AIRFARE/CNOA TRAINING/POFF 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 353.20 DEPOSIT/HOSTAGE NEG/FROLAND 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 72.80 REG.CNOA TRAINING/POFF 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 450.00 REG. DRUG-CR INTER/SACKVILLE 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 125.00 AIRFARE/HOSTAGE NEG/FROLAND 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 266.20 DUAL USB CAR CHARGER 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 19.98 AIRFARE/BACKGROUND/HARDWICK 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 349.20 ADHESIVE LABEL-1ST AID KIT 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 28.32 APPLE LIGHTNING FOR USB 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 24.06 TLO SEARCHES 10/2014 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 26.75 POSTAGE FOR MAILING PASSPORT3249 POSTAGE FOR MAILING PASSPORT 001.000.23.512.50.42.00 90.90 #3314 - 11/06/14 - LAWLESS - EDMONDS PD3314 TUNING FORKS FOR TRAFFIC CAR 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 39.25 40 CR123A BATTERIES 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 53.05 WIRE SPOOL/CASE PKG (SWAT) 628.000.41.521.23.31.00 1,500.00 CHAIR/FOOTSTOOL (WELLNESS) 001.000.22.521.10.31.00 216.26 CALENDAR REFILL (MACHADO) 001.000.41.521.22.31.00 27.98 51Page: Packet Page 80 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 52 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211661 11/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK 1099 & W2 TAX FORMS, BATTERY & REPAIR, D3470 1099 & W-2 tax forms and envelopes 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 185.71 Bulkregister.com - domain name 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 41.85 Timemark Inc - Repair to traffic 001.000.67.532.20.48.00 111.33 INV#3520 11/06/14 - TRAINING - EDMONDS P3520 FEDEX-DNA PROPERTY CRIMES 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 25.65 FEDEX CHG #14-3413,3179,2318 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 14.35 FEDEX CHG #14-3411,14-3848 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 14.35 MEAL/UNDER EXCLUSION/MOORE 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 42.35 FUEL/UNDER EXCLUSION/MOORE 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 30.44 MEAL/UNDER EXCLUSION/MOORE 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 104.26 LODGING/UNDER EXCLUSION/MOORE 001.000.41.521.40.43.00 415.16 FEDEX CHG #13-3371 001.000.41.521.10.42.00 14.35 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY: PRESCHOOL4675 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY: PRESCHOOL 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 137.81 MANTON INDUSTRIAL CORK PRODUCTS: CORK 001.000.64.571.23.31.00 119.36 AMAZON.COM: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 7.53 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY: MEADOWDALE 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 47.07 SAFEWAY: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: BANDAGES, 52Page: Packet Page 81 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 53 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211661 11/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 18.11 DOLLAR TREE STORES: PRESCHOOL SUPPLIES: 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 7.67 SNOHOMISH HEALTH DIST: CITY PARK SPRAY 132.000.64.594.76.41.00 315.00 AMAZON.COM: HAND SANITIZER REFILLS 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 39.75 EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: SIERRA 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 150.00 KAPLAN EARLY LEARNING CO: CHAIRS FOR 001.000.64.575.56.31.00 416.28 WALGREENS: 2ND PLACE AWARDS FOR EDMONDS 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 160.00 SAFEWAY: REFRESHMENTS FOR STREET 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 15.00 QFC: REFRESHMENTS FOR STREET SCRAMBLE 001.000.64.571.22.31.00 23.89 OCTOBER CHAMBER LUNCHEON4697 Fire District 1 Luncheon Meeting 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 53.54 October Chamber luncheon meeting 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 20.00 ASUS MONITORS, JOOMLA PLUG INS, BATTERY,5179 Newegg.com - ASUS VS Series VS228H-P 001.000.25.514.30.35.00 269.98 Newegg.com - Samsung UN32EH5000 32" 001.000.62.524.20.35.00 297.99 Office Max - Compression gas duster 2 pk 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 30.64 ServerSupply.com - HP 146.8GB 10000RPM 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 127.71 ExpertsExchange.com - IT Solutions 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 19.95 Avangate - Joomla.com single site 53Page: Packet Page 82 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 54 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211661 11/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 149.41 TK Tek LLC - software update for 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 99.99 Newegg.com - ASUS VB Series VB198T-P 001.000.31.518.88.35.00 279.98 Akeeba Ltd - software for backing up 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 116.41 Batterylogi - APC RBC55 Assembled 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 179.85 PP Ventures Proprietary Ltd - software 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 17.87 QLUE Limited - software module for 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 19.24 Shape 5 - Joomla 1 yr unlimited domains 001.000.31.518.88.49.00 237.99 Newegg.com - Coboc CL-U2-AAMF-10-BK 10 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 8.46 Newegg.com - Fosmon High Quality Black 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 142.87 Joomplace.com Belitsoft.com - 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 69.00 Newegg.com - Fosmon High Quality Black 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 109.90 Ari Soft - software module for website 001.000.31.518.88.31.00 16.26 CITY CLERK PURCHASE CARD5593 Misc recorded documents 001.000.25.514.30.49.00 165.00 Recording of Utility Liens 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 313.50 Recording of Utility Liens 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 313.50 Hilton Vancouver - hotel stay for S 001.000.25.514.30.43.00 169.51 54Page: Packet Page 83 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 55 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211661 11/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK HERALD SUBSCRIPTION, VANCOUVER TOURISM A5923 Subscription to Herald newspaper online. 001.000.61.557.20.49.00 99.95 Vancouver Magazine tourism promotion ad. 120.000.31.575.42.44.00 1,007.49 Purchase of stock photo images 001.000.61.558.70.49.00 243.00 Urbin Land Institute - Emerging Trends6045 Urbin Land Institute - Emerging Trends 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 50.00 Amazon order for "Kingston Digital 32GB 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 52.52 Downtown Research & Dev. Ctr - "The 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 97.45 City of Edmonds payment for permit for 001.000.62.524.20.41.00 160.00 TV's & mounts for plans checking - 001.000.62.524.20.35.00 2,169.86 Records Management training for Linda T 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 30.00 4 - 42" TV's for Plans checking - order 001.000.62.524.20.35.00 1,371.92 Downtown Research & Development Ctr~ 001.000.62.524.10.49.00 47.45 HUMANN TRIAL PARKING FEES7483 10/27/14 Humann trial parking 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 16.00 10/29/14 Humann trial parking 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 16.00 11/03/14 Humann trial parking 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 16.00 11/04/14 Humann trial parking 001.000.21.513.10.43.00 16.00 November Mayor's luncheon meeting 55Page: Packet Page 84 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 56 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211661 11/20/2014 (Continued)062693 US BANK 001.000.21.513.10.49.00 13.00 ENG CREDIT CARD OCTOBER 20148313 Hauss.Travel Costs to APWA Fall 001.000.67.532.20.43.00 156.99 E1DA.Click 2 Mail Neighborhood Notice 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 13.33 WFOA FEDERAL GRANT TRAINING 12/4/14 D SH8842 WFOA Federal Grant Requirements 001.000.31.514.23.49.00 125.00 Total :17,668.25 211662 11/20/2014 044960 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOC CTR 4100120 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER 421.000.74.534.80.41.00 103.02 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER 422.000.72.531.90.41.00 103.02 UTILITIES UNDERGROUND LOCATION CENTER 423.000.75.535.80.41.00 106.14 Total :312.18 211663 11/20/2014 073879 UTILITY SERVICES ASSOCIATES 124485 Water - S30 Console with Accessories Water - S30 Console with Accessories 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 4,050.00 Freight 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 40.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.35.00 388.55 Water - Leak Noise Correlator with124513 Water - Leak Noise Correlator with 421.000.74.594.34.64.00 21,450.00 Freight 421.000.74.594.34.64.00 80.00 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.594.34.64.00 2,045.35 56Page: Packet Page 85 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 57 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :28,053.9021166311/20/2014 073879 073879 UTILITY SERVICES ASSOCIATES 211664 11/20/2014 075052 VENEMA, KRISTEN 91914 JUROR JUROR 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 211665 11/20/2014 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH Renewals WOC Renewal For - L McMurphy, R Shore, WOC Renewal For - L McMurphy, R Shore, 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 168.00 Renewals for S Matthews, S Long 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 84.00 Total :252.00 211666 11/20/2014 049500 WEST PUBLISHING 830490966 PAMPHLET ON COURT RULES PAMPHLET ON COURT RULES 001.000.23.512.50.31.00 318.09 Total :318.09 211667 11/20/2014 075048 WILSON, WILLIAM 091914 JUROR JUROR 001.000.23.523.30.49.20 15.60 Total :15.60 211668 11/20/2014 075080 WINNIFORD, SUSAN 11/7 REFUND 11/7 REFUND, CLASS CANCELLED 11/7 REFUND, CLASS CANCELLED 001.000.239.200 58.00 Total :58.00 211669 11/20/2014 073479 WU, THOMAS 1037 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 148.39 NOV 2014 - EDMONDS PDNOV 2014 TRANSLATION FOR CASE #14-4403 001.000.41.521.21.41.00 100.00 Total :248.39 57Page: Packet Page 86 of 433 11/20/2014 Voucher List City of Edmonds 58 11:14:21AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 211670 11/20/2014 072057 XYLEM DEWATERING SOLUTIONS 400448778 Engineering - Pump & Parts Engineering - Pump & Parts 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 48,951.60 Freight 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 1,200.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 4,764.40 Total :54,916.00 Bank total :835,043.06117 Vouchers for bank code :usbank 835,043.06Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report117 58Page: Packet Page 87 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC STM 190th Pl SW Wall Construction c428 E3FF STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA SWR 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE STM 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c406 E3FA STM 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects c407 E3FB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA STR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC WTR 2014 Waterline Replacement Program c422 E4JA STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC STR 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk c421 E3DA WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB STR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 88 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)c390 E2GB WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB STR Citywide Safety Improvements c404 E2AC SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c409 E3FD STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA FAC Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades c393 E3LA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES m013 E7FG Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 89 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB WTR OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)c141 E3JB STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA STR School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant c420 E3AA PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation c307 E9FB ENG Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 90 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STR E0AA c329 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade STM E0FC c326 Stormwater GIS Support WTR E0IA c324 AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements WTR E0JA c363 2010 Waterline Replacement Program FAC E0LA c327 Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project FAC E0LB c332 Senior Center Roof Repairs STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1AB c343 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements General E1EA c372 SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM E1FD c339 Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades STM E1FF c341 Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects STM E1FH c349 Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement SWR E1GA c347 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement WTR E1GB c370 Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update WTR E1JA c333 2011 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JB c344 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood WTR E1JC c345 Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study WTR E1JD c346 PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment WTR E1JE c340 2012 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JK c375 Main Street Watermain STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AC c404 Citywide Safety Improvements STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) WTR E2CA c388 2012 Waterline Overlay Program WTR E2CB c389 Pioneer Way Road Repair STR E2CC c399 5th Ave Overlay Project PM E2DB c146 Interurban Trail STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STM E2FD c381 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 91 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STM E2FE c382 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements SWR E2GA c369 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update SWR E2GB c390 Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP) STR E3AA c420 School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STR E3DA c421 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FA c406 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement STM E3FB c407 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FD c409 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FF c428 190th Pl SW Wall Construction STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E3GB c142 OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements WTR E3JA c397 2013 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) WTR E3JB c141 OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) FAC E3LA c393 Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals STR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays ENG E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 92 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring WTR E4JA c422 2014 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR E6DA c245 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project STR E6DB c256 Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project General E6MA c238 SR99 Enhancement Program STR E7AA c265 Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CB c268 Shell Valley Emergency Access Road STM E7FG m013 NPDES PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza SWR E8GA c298 Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) SWR E8GD c301 City-Wide Sewer Improvements PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PM E8MB c290 Marina Beach Additional Parking STR E9CA c294 2009 Street Overlay Program STR E9DA c312 226th Street Walkway Project STM E9FB c307 Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation SWR E9GA c304 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design PM E9MA c321 Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 93 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title WTR c141 E3JB OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) SWR c142 E3GB OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements PM c146 E2DB Interurban Trail General c238 E6MA SR99 Enhancement Program STR c245 E6DA 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project STR c256 E6DB Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project STR c265 E7AA Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements STR c268 E7CB Shell Valley Emergency Access Road PM c276 E7MA Dayton Street Plaza PM c282 E8MA Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PM c290 E8MB Marina Beach Additional Parking STR c294 E9CA 2009 Street Overlay Program SWR c298 E8GA Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) SWR c301 E8GD City-Wide Sewer Improvements SWR c304 E9GA Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design STM c307 E9FB Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation STR c312 E9DA 226th Street Walkway Project PM c321 E9MA Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements WTR c324 E0IA AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements STM c326 E0FC Stormwater GIS Support FAC c327 E0LA Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project STR c329 E0AA 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade FAC c332 E0LB Senior Center Roof Repairs WTR c333 E1JA 2011 Waterline Replacement Program STM c339 E1FD Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades WTR c340 E1JE 2012 Waterline Replacement Program STM c341 E1FF Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects STR c342 E1AA Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR c343 E1AB 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming WTR c344 E1JB 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood WTR c345 E1JC Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study WTR c346 E1JD PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment SWR c347 E1GA 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement STM c349 E1FH Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 94 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title STR c354 E1DA Sunset Walkway Improvements WTR c363 E0JA 2010 Waterline Replacement Program STR c368 E1CA 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements SWR c369 E2GA 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update WTR c370 E1GB Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update General c372 E1EA SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM c374 E1FM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives WTR c375 E1JK Main Street Watermain STM c376 E1FN Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM c378 E2FA North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM c379 E2FB SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM c380 E2FC Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STM c381 E2FD Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 STM c382 E2FE 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements WTR c388 E2CA 2012 Waterline Overlay Program WTR c389 E2CB Pioneer Way Road Repair SWR c390 E2GB Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP) STR c391 E2AA Transportation Plan Update STR c392 E2AB 9th Avenue Improvement Project FAC c393 E3LA Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades WTR c397 E3JA 2013 Waterline Replacement Program SWR c398 E3GA 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STR c399 E2CC 5th Ave Overlay Project STR c404 E2AC Citywide Safety Improvements STR c405 E2AD Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM c406 E3FA 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement STM c407 E3FB 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects STM c408 E3FC Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM c409 E3FD Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM c410 E3FE Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive PRK c417 E4MA City Spray Park WTR c418 E3JB 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC c419 E3LB ESCO III Project STR c420 E3AA School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 95 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title STR c421 E3DA 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk WTR c422 E4JA 2014 Waterline Replacement Program STR c423 E3DB 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR c424 E3DC 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR c425 E3DD 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR c426 E3DE ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STR c427 E3AB SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STM c428 E3FF 190th Pl SW Wall Construction STM c429 E3FG Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM c430 E3FH SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements STM c433 E4FA 2014 Drainage Improvements STM c434 E4FB LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM c435 E4FC 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM c436 E4FD 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STR c438 E4CA 2014 Overlay Program WTR c440 E4JB 2015 Waterline Replacement Program SWR c441 E4GA 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project FAC c443 E4MB Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab FAC c444 E4LA Public Safety Controls System Upgrades WWTP c446 E4HA Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STR c451 E4CB 2014 Chip Seals STR c452 E4CC 2014 Waterline Overlays ENG c453 E4DA Train Trench - Concept STR c454 E4DB SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing STM c455 E4FE Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR c456 E4GB Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I STM c459 E4FF Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines WTR c460 E4JC 2016 Water Comp Plan Update STR i005 E7AC 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STM m013 E7FG NPDES Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 96 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number ENG Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB FAC Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades c393 E3LA FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE STM 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c406 E3FA STM 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects c407 E3FB STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c409 E3FD STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM 190th Pl SW Wall Construction c428 E3FF STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 97 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF STM NPDES m013 E7FG STM Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation c307 E9FB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STR Citywide Safety Improvements c404 E2AC STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD STR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC STR School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant c420 E3AA STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STR 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk c421 E3DA STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 98 of 433 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA SWR 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)c390 E2GB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB WTR OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)c141 E3JB WTR 2014 Waterline Replacement Program c422 E4JA WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA Revised 11/20/2014 Packet Page 99 of 433 Pa y r o l l E a r n i n g s S u m m a r y R e p o r t Ci t y o f E d m o n d s Pa y P e r i o d : 6 7 7 ( 1 1 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 4 t o 1 1 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 ) Ho u r s Amount Ho u r T y p e H o u r C l a s s De s c r i p t i o n Ed u c a t i o n a l P a y C o r r e c t i o n RE G U L A R H O U R S -e d 2 0. 0 0 -156.28 10 % O U T O F C L A S S MI S C E L L A N E O U S 00 c 1 0. 0 0 256.35 SI C K L E A V E SI C K 12 1 53 2 . 0 0 18,164.97 VA C A T I O N VA C A T I O N 12 2 80 9 . 3 7 30,553.09 HO L I D A Y H O U R S HO L I D A Y 12 3 12 9 . 5 0 4,581.50 FL O A T E R H O L I D A Y HO L I D A Y 12 4 43 . 0 0 1,456.62 CO M P E N S A T O R Y T I M E CO M P H O U R S 12 5 12 6 . 8 8 5,059.96 Ho l i d a y C o m p e n s a t i o n U s e d CO M P H O U R S 13 0 4. 0 0 135.27 Ke l l y D a y U s e d RE G U L A R H O U R S 15 0 13 2 . 0 0 4,658.90 CO M P T I M E A U T O P A Y CO M P H O U R S 15 5 10 3 . 9 0 4,391.20 MA N A G E M E N T L E A V E VA C A T I O N 16 0 14 . 0 0 938.15 RE G U L A R H O U R S RE G U L A R H O U R S 19 0 13 , 9 3 1 . 5 0 520,012.03 AD M I N I S T R A T I V E L E A V E RE G U L A R H O U R S 19 5 10 0 . 0 0 3,517.85 LI G H T D U T Y RE G U L A R H O U R S 19 6 76 . 0 0 3,097.00 OV E R T I M E - S T R A I G H T OV E R T I M E H O U R S 21 0 14 7 . 2 5 6,159.36 WA T E R W A T C H S T A N D B Y OV E R T I M E H O U R S 21 5 48 . 0 0 2,320.77 ST A N D B Y T R E A T M E N T P L A N T MI S C E L L A N E O U S 21 6 8. 0 0 749.83 OV E R T I M E 1 . 5 OV E R T I M E H O U R S 22 0 25 1 . 5 0 14,333.82 OV E R T I M E - D O U B L E OV E R T I M E H O U R S 22 5 9. 5 0 601.26 SH I F T D I F F E R E N T I A L SH I F T D I F F E R E N T I A L 41 1 36 . 0 0 719.32 RE T R O A C T I V E P A Y RE T R O A C T I V E P A Y 60 0 0. 0 0 964.42 AC C R U E D C O M P CO M P H O U R S 60 2 88 . 2 5 0.00 Ho l i d a y C o m p 1 . 0 CO M P H O U R S 60 3 8. 0 0 0.00 AC C R U E D C O M P T I M E CO M P H O U R S 60 4 15 0 . 0 0 0.00 AC C R U E D C O M P T I M E CO M P H O U R S 60 6 2. 0 0 0.00 CO M P T I M E - I N F O R M A L CO M P H O U R S 60 8 3. 0 0 172.61 AC C R E D I T A T I O N P A Y MI S C E L L A N E O U S ac c 0. 0 0 24.22 Ac c r e d i t a t i o n 1 % P a r t T i m e MI S C E L L A N E O U S ac p 0. 0 0 0.00 AC C R E D / P O L I C E S U P P O R T MI S C E L L A N E O U S ac s 0. 0 0 166.65 BO C I I C e r t i f i c a t i o n MI S C E L L A N E O U S bo c 0. 0 0 81.17 Re p a y m e n t A g r e e m e n t RE G U L A R H O U R S ce l l 0. 0 0 -60.96 Co l l i s i o n R e c o n s t r u c t i o n i s t MI S C E L L A N E O U S co l r e 0. 0 0 135.29 TR A I N I N G C O R P O R A L MI S C E L L A N E O U S cp l 0. 0 0 140.18 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 Page 1 of 2 Packet Page 100 of 433 Pa y r o l l E a r n i n g s S u m m a r y R e p o r t Ci t y o f E d m o n d s Pa y P e r i o d : 6 7 7 ( 1 1 / 0 1 / 2 0 1 4 t o 1 1 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 4 ) Ho u r s Amount Ho u r T y p e H o u r C l a s s De s c r i p t i o n CE R T I F I C A T I O N I I I P A Y MI S C E L L A N E O U S cr t 0. 0 0 516.16 DE T E C T I V E P A Y MI S C E L L A N E O U S de t 0. 0 0 97.80 De t e c t i v e 4 % MI S C E L L A N E O U S de t 4 0. 0 0 942.14 ED U C A T I O N P A Y 2 % ED U C A T I O N P A Y ed 1 0. 0 0 761.21 ED U C A T I O N P A Y 4 % ED U C A T I O N P A Y ed 2 0. 0 0 700.90 ED U C A T I O N P A Y 6 % ED U C A T I O N P A Y ed 3 0. 0 0 4,360.95 HO L I D A Y HO L I D A Y ho l 1, 2 2 7 . 8 0 46,004.02 K- 9 P A Y MI S C E L L A N E O U S k9 0. 0 0 198.25 LO N G E V I T Y P A Y 2 % LO N G E V I T Y lg 1 0. 0 0 1,747.33 LO N G E V I T Y 5 . 5 % LO N G E V I T Y lg 1 0 0. 0 0 399.81 LO N G E V I T Y P A Y 4 % LO N G E V I T Y P A Y lg 2 0. 0 0 801.96 LO N G E V I T Y 6 % LO N G E V I T Y P A Y lg 3 0. 0 0 5,379.00 Lo n g e v i t y 1 % LO N G E V I T Y lg 4 0. 0 0 210.49 Lo n g e v i t y . 5 % LO N G E V I T Y lg 6 0. 0 0 315.09 Lo n g e v i t y 1 . 5 % LO N G E V I T Y lg 7 0. 0 0 790.35 Lo n g e v i t y 3 . 5 % LO N G E V I T Y lg 9 0. 0 0 84.77 Me d i c a l L e a v e A b s e n t ( u n p a i d ) AB S E N T me l a 48 . 0 0 0.00 Me d i c a l L e a v e S i c k SI C K me l s 4. 0 0 164.22 Me d i c a l L e a v e V a c a t i o n VA C A T I O N me l v 20 . 0 0 821.13 MO T O R C Y C L E P A Y MI S C E L L A N E O U S mt c 0. 0 0 195.60 Pu b l i c D i s c l o s u r e S p e c i a l i s t MI S C E L L A N E O U S pd s 0. 0 0 45.74 PH Y S I C A L F I T N E S S P A Y MI S C E L L A N E O U S ph y 0. 0 0 1,447.23 PR O F E S S I O N A L S T A N D A R D S S E R G E A N MI S C E L L A N E O U S pr o f 0. 0 0 149.96 SP E C I A L D U T Y P A Y 5 % MI S C E L L A N E O U S sd p 0. 0 0 494.56 AD M I N I S T R A T I V E S E R G E A N T MI S C E L L A N E O U S sg t 0. 0 0 149.96 TR A F F I C MI S C E L L A N E O U S tr a f 0. 0 0 308.07 To t a l N e t P a y : $ 4 6 6 , 2 5 8 . 5 6 $6 9 0 , 2 6 1 . 2 5 18 , 0 5 3 . 4 5 11 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 4 Page 2 of 2 Packet Page 101 of 433 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 731 (11/20/2014 to 11/20/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description REGULAR HOURSREGULAR HOURS190 36.00 968.85 Total Net Pay:$772.29 $968.85 36.00 11/20/2014 Page 1 of 1 Packet Page 102 of 433 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 677 - 11/01/2014 to 11/15/2014 Bank: usbank - US Bank Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck # 61293 11/20/2014 mebt AST TTEE 81,425.31 0.00 61294 11/20/2014 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 2,808.00 0.00 61295 11/20/2014 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 436.50 0.00 61296 11/20/2014 flex FLEX-PLAN SERVICES, INC 700.76 0.00 61297 11/20/2014 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 4,342.00 0.00 61298 11/20/2014 icma VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS 304884 1,485.81 0.00 91,198.38 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Direct DepositCheck AmtNamePayee #DateCheck # 2147 11/20/2014 uhc UNITEDHEALTHCARE INSURANCE CO 237,174.33 0.00 2149 11/20/2014 us US BANK 92,887.99 0.00 2150 11/20/2014 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 21,031.50 0.00 2153 11/20/2014 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,143.60 0.00 2154 11/20/2014 flex FLEX-PLAN SERVICES, INC 238.70 0.00 2155 11/20/2014 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 223.50 0.00 356,699.62 0.00 447,898.00 0.00Grand Totals: Page 1 of 111/20/2014 Packet Page 103 of 433 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 727 (11/14/2014 to 11/14/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description HOLIDAY BUY BACKHOLIDAY153 4,190.50 171,098.13 Total Net Pay:$125,150.61 $171,098.13 4,190.50 11/20/2014 Page 1 of 1 Packet Page 104 of 433 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 729 (11/14/2014 to 11/14/2014) Hours AmountHour Type Hour Class Description KELLY DAYS BUY BACKKELLY DAY149 1,135.60 47,031.64 Total Net Pay:$36,909.77 $47,031.64 1,135.60 11/20/2014 Page 1 of 1 Packet Page 105 of 433 AM-7276 5. C. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:Consent Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Brian Tuley Department:Finance Review Committee: Finance Committee Action: Approve for Consent Agenda Type: Action Information Subject Title Approval to Surplus Computer Equipment Recommendation Information Services is submitting the attached list of computers that are beyond their useful life and need Council approval to surplus. Previous Council Action Narrative The equipment listed in the attached document has outlived their useful life with the City. Information Systems request permission to recycle equipment listed and remove from City inventory. Attachments 21041021_surplus Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Scott James 11/13/2014 01:07 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 11/13/2014 01:07 PM Mayor Dave Earling 11/13/2014 01:09 PM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/13/2014 01:49 PM Form Started By: Brian Tuley Started On: 11/10/2014 10:20 AM Final Approval Date: 11/13/2014 Packet Page 106 of 433 Serial #Mfgr.Model Purchase date 2UA7010DGH HP Compaq dc5700 5/5/2007 2UA7010DGR HP Compaq dc5700 5/5/2007 2UB505087G HP Compaq dc5700 unknown (>5 years old) C8MR771 Dell OptiPlex GX280 4/9/2005 CNU5480JYF HP Compaq nc8230 unknown (>5 years old) CNU54903K0 HP Compaq nc8230 unknown (>5 years old) CNU6021HRM HP Compaq nc6220 unknown (>5 years old) CNU6021HRX HP Compaq nc6220 unknown (>5 years old) DJGD0F1 Dell OptiPlex 320 10/29/2008 G4D8K51 Dell OptiPlex GX60 8/19/2004 KCKD61R IBM 8189D8U unknown (>5 years old) MXL6020B48 HP Compaq dc5100 unknown (>5 years old) MXL6030447 HP Compaq dc5100 unknown (>5 years old) MXL81917QY HP Compaq dc5800 5/17/2008 MXL81917R2 HP Compaq dc5800 5/17/2008 MXL81917R7 HP Compaq dc5800 5/17/2008 MXL81917RL HP Compaq dc5800 5/17/2008 MXL81917RM HP Compaq dc5800 5/17/2008 Packet Page 107 of 433 AM-7303 5. D. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:Consent Submitted For:Dave Earling Submitted By:Carolyn LaFave Department:Mayor's Office Type: Action Information Subject Title Confirmation of Peggy Irwin Soraich and Joan Longstaff to the Cemetery Board in positions #3 and #4. Recommendation Mayor Earling recommends Peggy Irwin Soraich and Joan Longstaff's confirmation to the Cemetery Board. Previous Council Action Narrative Mayor Earling believes both candidates Soraich and Longstaff will be valuable additions to the Cemetery Board. Cemetery Board terms are for four years with no term limits. Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 11/18/2014 02:01 PM Mayor Dave Earling 11/18/2014 02:50 PM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/19/2014 08:12 AM Form Started By: Carolyn LaFave Started On: 11/18/2014 11:41 AM Final Approval Date: 11/19/2014 Packet Page 108 of 433 AM-7310 5. E. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:Consent Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Scott James Department:Finance Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Information Information Subject Title October 2014 Budgetary Financial Report Recommendation Previous Council Action Narrative Attachments October Budgetary Financial Report Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Scott James 11/20/2014 11:03 AM City Clerk Scott Passey 11/20/2014 11:04 AM Mayor Dave Earling 11/20/2014 01:31 PM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/20/2014 01:45 PM Form Started By: Scott James Started On: 11/20/2014 10:57 AM Final Approval Date: 11/20/2014 Packet Page 109 of 433 CITY OF EDMONDS MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT October 2014 Packet Page 110 of 433 City of Edmonds Quarterly Financial Review: October 2014 The Budgetary Financial Report includes a brief review of key financial information included within the report or affecting the City’s finances. This report includes a series of cash-basis reports, graphic General Fund trends for individual department monthly expenditures and key General Fund and enterprise revenues, and also current year-to-date changes in fund balances. General Fund Revenues and Expenditures Year to date, General Fund revenues are equal to 77% of budgeted revenues for the year. Revenues year to date are 16.6% greater than 2013’s year to date revenues, however, 2014 revenues include $2.7 million in bond refunding revenues. Without the bond refunding revenues, 2014 General Fund revenues are $1,525,333 or 6% greater than 2013 revenues. Year-to-date Sales Tax revenues are $431,679 ahead of sales tax in 2013 and utility tax revenues are $182,034 above 2013 receipts. Development related revenues are $407,238 ahead of 2013 revenues. Overall general fund revenues for the first half of 2014, show are on track to meet anticipated budget amounts. All General Fund department expenditures are on track to meet or come under budget expectations. Non-General Fund Revenues and Expenditures Non-General Fund revenues are ahead of 2013 levels. The increases are led by Water, Storm and Sewer Utility Fund revenues, which are beneficiaries of rate increases that became effective in January of this year. Non-General Fund expenditures are on track with budgeted expectations. REET Revenues Real Estate Excise tax revenues continue to come in strong and are higher than a year ago. Projected year end revenues should exceed the 2014 budget. Economic Outlook The regional economy continues to show strength. As of August, the Greater Seattle area unemployment rate decreased to 5.3% from a rate of 6.0% a year earlier. This compares to the State unemployment rate, which decreased from 7.0% in August of 2013 to 5.6% and the national unemployment rate, which changed from 7.2% to 6.1%. Packet Page 111 of 433 Page 1 of 1 Fund No.Title 2014 Amended Budget 10/31/2013 Revenues 10/31/2014 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received 001 GENERAL FUND 39,027,697$ 25,786,843$ 30,075,490$ 8,952,207$ 77% 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 594,946 175,294 298,534 296,412 50% 011 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 903,858 482,029 772 903,086 0% 012 CONTINGENCY RESERVE FUND 527,115 66,306 17,172 509,943 3% 013 MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION FUND - - 111 (111) 0% 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 8,000 714 3 7,997 0% 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 679,800 28,494 195,883 483,917 29% 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 20,075 17,299 19,879 196 99% 111 STREET FUND 1,712,100 1,206,940 1,460,574 251,526 85% 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 9,231,407 1,264,273 2,474,077 6,757,330 27% 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 102,823 59,469 72,167 30,656 70% 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE 25 16 53 (28) 210% 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 54,140 52,302 58,317 (4,177) 108% 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 20,308 7,130 11,862 8,446 58% 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 1,623 434 213 1,410 13% 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 18,200 24,560 19,770 (1,570) 109% 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 904,343 784,230 813,305 91,038 90% 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 904,243 783,287 811,424 92,819 90% 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 43,708 30,604 25,858 17,850 59% 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 4,000 291,992 48,617 (44,617) 1215% 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 160,136 123,447 148,759 11,377 93% 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 1,552,517 298,728 329,491 1,223,026 21% 136 PARKS TRUST FUND 186 311 522 (336) 281% 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 12,970 14,131 18,418 (5,448) 142% 138 SIST ER CIT Y COMMISSION 4,519 9,362 4,127 392 91% 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 645,000 560,166 569,375 75,625 88% 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 28,600 30,874 29,699 (1,099) 104% 213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND 28,626 23 47 28,579 0% 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,022,689 92,264 84,010 938,679 8% 232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND 966,286 - 9,211 957,075 1% 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 193,017 238,758 (238,758) 0% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 6,249,596 5,165,145 6,102,778 146,818 98% 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 3,630,158 2,892,134 3,134,597 495,561 86% 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 8,406,515 6,598,120 8,283,686 122,829 99% 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 840,816 - 340,409 500,408 40% 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,478,108 1,197,350 1,270,309 207,799 86% 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 45,379 49,674 50,303 (4,924) 111% 627 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT - 55,704 78,793 (78,793) 0% 79,830,512$ 48,342,667$ 57,097,373$ 22,733,139$ 72% CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Packet Page 112 of 433 Page 1 of 1 Fund No.Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent 001 GENERAL FUND 41,207,514$ 26,255,302$ 30,161,608$ 11,045,906$ 73% 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 503,361 257,572 239,045 264,316 47% 011 RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND 300,000 558,835 - 300,000 0% 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 8,000 5,280 - 8,000 0% 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 720,200 90,238 74,683 645,517 10% 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 81,033 38,073 42,872 38,161 53% 111 STREET FUND 1,658,810 1,127,356 1,312,718 346,092 79% 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 9,634,666 1,206,175 2,570,609 7,064,057 27% 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 149,349 56,762 83,158 66,191 56% 118 MEMORIAL STREET TREE - - - - 0% 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 54,000 52,401 34,618 19,382 64% 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,786 14,740 - 26,786 0% 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,600 3,293 1,658 1,942 46% 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 19,000 12,240 6,846 12,154 36% 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,582,712 188,002 121,309 1,461,403 8% 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1, PARKS ACQ FUND 1,199,841 32,108 40,893 1,158,948 3% 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 18,200 28,162 3,429 14,771 19% 129 SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND 13,653 168,293 17,469 (3,816) 128% 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 175,435 109,884 120,348 55,087 69% 132 PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,270,517 64,696 201,474 2,069,043 9% 136 PARKS TRUST FUND - - - - 0% 138 SIST ER CIT Y COMMISSION *4,500 890 4,992 (492) 111% 139 TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 645,000 560,166 569,375 75,625 88% 211 L.I.D. FUND CONTROL 28,600 - - 28,600 0% 213 L.I.D. GUARANTY FUND - - - - 0% 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,022,690 92,264 84,614 938,076 8% 232 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND 966,286 - 9,211 957,075 1% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 10,145,476 5,653,079 5,836,439 4,309,037 58% 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 7,233,213 2,422,712 3,080,386 4,152,827 43% 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 14,835,838 10,548,444 8,815,223 6,020,615 59% 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 840,816 82,095 340,408 500,409 40% 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,093,279 705,074 787,759 305,520 72% 617 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 89,615 68,743 45,462 44,153 51% 627 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRCIT - 789 45,700 (45,700) 0% 96,531,990$ 50,403,669$ 54,652,307$ 41,925,384$ 57% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY *A budget amendment will be completed for this expense Packet Page 113 of 433 Page 1 of 3 Title 2014 Amended Budget 10/31/2013 Revenues 10/31/2014 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received TAXES : REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX 1 9,857,161$ 5,933,281$ 5,845,250$ 4,011,911$ 59% EMS PROPERTY TAX 2 3,105,938 1,838,481 1,814,638 1,291,300 58% VOTED PROPERTY TAX 3 946,303 584,971 563,190 383,113 60% LOCAL RETAIL SALES/USE TAX 4 5,525,609 4,372,215 4,803,894 721,715 87% NATURAL GAS USE TAX 8,793 8,189 8,897 (104) 101% 1/10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 590,174 474,647 502,155 88,019 85% ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 1,490,394 1,292,050 1,353,054 137,340 91% GAS UTILITY TAX 819,286 575,862 577,044 242,242 70% SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 297,972 251,767 257,331 40,641 86% WATER UTILITY TAX 920,882 791,314 867,773 53,109 94% SEWER UTILITY TAX 479,750 395,040 434,640 45,110 91% STORMWATER UTILITY TAX 295,972 247,438 258,550 37,422 87% T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 738,219 667,391 688,978 49,241 93% TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 1,544,793 1,162,447 1,127,973 416,820 73% PULLTABS TAX 62,613 50,186 45,580 17,033 73% AMUSEMENT GAMES 746 128 37 709 5% LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX 232,528 168,515 175,128 57,400 75% 26,917,133 18,813,922 19,324,114 7,593,019 72% LICENSES AND PERMITS: FIRE PERMITS-SPECIAL USE 5,666 5,070 230 5,436 4% PROF AND OCC LICENSE-TAXI 700 630 630 70 90% AMUSEMENTS 4,500 4,350 4,675 (175) 104% FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-COMCAST 659,488 668,920 689,382 (29,894) 105% FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT - 25,867 36,207 (36,207) 0% FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-VERIZON/FRONTIER 115,219 64,900 93,795 21,424 81% FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-BLACKROCK 14,299 11,451 17,064 (2,765) 119% FRANCHISE AGREMENT-ZAYO - 5,000 - - 0% OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 233,162 261,933 274,689 (41,527) 118% GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 107,360 106,006 106,584 777 99% DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 38,500 22,860 37,045 1,455 96% NON-RESIDENT BUS LICENSE 53,963 40,250 41,600 12,363 77% RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 9,000 9,773 - 9,000 0% BUILDING STRUCTURE PERMITS 5 503,000 378,749 588,797 (85,797) 117% ANIMAL LICENSES 53,040 6,691 9,129 43,911 17% STREET AND CURB PERMIT 151,045 41,174 77,326 73,719 51% OTR NON-BUS LIC/PERMITS 18,467 8,851 13,002 5,465 70% 1,967,409 1,662,473 1,990,154 (22,745) 101% INTERGOVERNMENTAL: DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 3,176 5,119 794 2,382 25% ROOFTOP SOLAR CHALLENGE GRANT - 34,000 - - 0% WTSC X-52 DUI AND SPEEDING - 583 - - 0% TARGET ZERO TEAMS GRANT 7,500 8,571 4,216 3,284 56% HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 3,000 5,291 3,560 (560) 119% DOCKSIDE DRILLS GRANT REIMBURSE - 486 1,834 (1,834) 0% WA STATE ADMIN OFFICE COURTS GRANT - 4,019 - - 0% 2014 COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT - - 10,000 (10,000) 0% WA STATE TRAFFIC COMM GRANT - 1,106 - - 0% NORTHWEST SOLAR COMMUNITIES GRANT 22,000 - 18,500 3,500 84% SMART COMMUTER PROJECT GRANT - 600 - - 0% PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 187,033 188,570 - 187,033 0% MVET/SPECIAL DISTRIBUTION 8,916 9,572 10,287 (1,371) 115% JUDICIAL SALARY CONTRIBUTION-STATE 12,600 12,536 12,376 224 98% CRIMINAL JUSTICE-SPECIAL PROGRAMS 34,300 35,628 38,062 (3,762) 111% DUI - CITIES 7,900 7,231 7,193 707 91% LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 64,675 26,662 75,069 (10,394) 116% LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS 360,879 268,323 266,319 94,560 74% VERDANT INTERLOCAL GRANTS 39,513 - 41,513 (2,000) 105% 751,492 608,296 489,723 261,769 65% REVENUES - GENERAL FUND CITY OF EDMONDS 2 EMS Property Tax is down $23,843 from 2013 3 Voted Property Tax is down $21,781 from 2013 4 Local Retail Sales/Use Tax is up $431,679 from 2013 1 Real Personal/Property Tax is down $88,030 from 2013 5 Building Structure Permits are up $210,048 from 2013 Packet Page 114 of 433 Page 2 of 3 Title 2014 Amended Budget 10/31/2013 Revenues 10/31/2014 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMTS 1,200 1,283 1,128 73 94% CIVIL PROBATE FILINGS - 16 - - 0% COURT RECORD SERVICES 50 - - 50 0% D/M COURT REC SER 50 51 27 23 53% SHARED COURT COSTS 3,700 - - 3,700 0% MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 200 229 520 (320) 260% SALE MAPS & BOOKS 73 160 20 53 28% CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS 25,086 - - 25,086 0% PHOTOCOPIES 4,618 1,809 1,709 2,909 37% POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 4,000 3,714 3,329 671 83% ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 6 267,630 155,035 304,819 (37,189) 114% ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES 1,036 1,460 - 1,036 0% SNO-ISLE 58,667 81,668 57,369 1,298 98% PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 11,000 9,875 16,350 (5,350) 149% POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 26,000 27,797 30,223 (4,223) 116% OCDETF OVERTIME - 5,494 11,784 (11,784) 0% CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST.12,300 2,610 3,011 9,289 24% WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 36,000 32,579 41,175 (5,175) 114% DRE REIMBURSEABLE - 709 - - 0% MISCELLANEOUS POLICE SERVICES 1,500 - 3,657 (2,157) 244% POLICE - FINGERPRINTING 275 - 560 (285) 204% DUI EMERGENCY FIRE SERVICES 700 514 176 524 25% FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 28,503 40,768 52,730 (24,227) 185% ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 64,000 60,312 58,524 5,476 91% ELECTRONIC MONITOR DUI 590 - - 0% BOOKING FEES 6,300 5,359 5,495 805 87% FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 5,716 5,865 14,834 (9,118) 260% EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 24,575 14,847 13,607 10,968 55% EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 7 800,000 612,052 863,361 (63,361) 108% POLICE FINGERPRINTING - 255 - - 0% CRIM CNV FEE DUI - 542 - - 0% CRIM CONV FEE CT 5,700 3,708 2,533 3,167 44% CRIM CONV FEE CN 2,000 1,444 858 1,142 43% FIBER SERVICES 37,349 21,400 7,780 29,569 21% INTERGOVERNMENTAL FIBER SERVICES 7,454 6,000 6,000 1,454 80% FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 218 974 1,265 (1,047) 580% ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 6,616 5,060 3,550 3,067 54% ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 95,950 66,787 52,240 43,710 54% PLAN CHECKING FEES 310,000 236,291 427,941 (117,941) 138% FIRE PLAN CHECK FEES 2,984 2,050 7,070 (4,086) 237% PLANNING 1% INSPECTION FEE 1,630 966 1,336 294 82% S.E.P.A. REVIEW 6,980 4,850 2,925 4,055 42% CRITICAL AREA STUDY 16,530 17,825 20,910 (4,380) 126% DV COORDINATOR SERVICES 8,600 9,227 7,237 1,363 84% SWIM POOL ENTRANCE FEES 61,000 63,530 59,372 1,628 97% GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 5,500 3,953 4,819 681 88% LOCKER FEES 350 439 424 (74) 121% SWIM CLASS FEES 32,000 30,132 31,009 991 97% PROGRAM FEES 757,000 633,722 697,958 59,042 92% TAXABLE RECREATION ACTIVITIES 120,000 110,092 104,019 15,981 87% SWIM TEAM/DIVE TEAM 32,500 30,365 34,266 (1,766) 105% BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 825 695 930 (105) 113% INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT-CONTRACT SVCS8 1,902,614 1,463,810 1,717,044 185,570 90% 4,796,979 3,778,913 4,675,890 121,089 97% CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 8 Engineering has provided a larger amount of services to other departments from 2013 to 2014 6 Development Services has collected a larger amount of fees in 2014 versus 2013 7 EMS Trasport User Feesare up $251,309 from 2013 Packet Page 115 of 433 Title 2014 Amended Budget 10/31/2013 Revenues 10/31/2014 Revenues Amount Remaining % Received FINES AND FORFEITURES: PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 11,000 11,254 6,860 4,140 62% TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 38,000 29,277 22,470 15,530 59% NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 310,000 256,005 219,197 90,803 71% CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA)25,000 22,456 17,758 7,242 71% SPEEDING DOUBLE 330 297 38 292 12% NON-TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 2,085 298 25,704 (23,619) 1233% OTHER INFRACTIONS '04 2,300 1,342 708 1,592 31% PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 52,000 42,452 43,997 8,003 85% PARK/INDDISZONE - 2,647 789 (789) 0% DWI PENALTIES 3,000 3,559 6,112 (3,112) 204% DUI - DP ACCT 3,700 2,406 2,191 1,509 59% CRIM CNV FEE DUI 700 - 554 146 79% OTHER CRIMINAL TRAF MISDEM PEN - - 70 (70) 0% CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 38,000 32,026 28,683 9,317 75% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT - 778 1,729 (1,729) 0% OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 100 82 29 71 29% OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 - 1,630 5,823 (5,823) 0% COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 1,900 1,604 1,157 743 61% CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN - 399 964 (964) 0% CRIMINAL COSTS-RECOUPMENTS 120,000 99,833 70,812 49,188 59% PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 35,000 24,992 25,624 9,376 73% COURT INTERPRETER COSTS 50 55 227 (177) 453% BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 4,000 4,330 4,840 (840) 121% MISC FINES AND PENALTIES 3,600 1,790 250 3,350 7% 650,765 539,514 486,586 164,179 75% MISCELLANEOUS: INVESTMENT INTEREST 88,200 2,194 14,093 74,107 16% INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 1,281 1,203 512 769 40% INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 4,000 3,761 5,720 (1,720) 143% PARKING 12,804 8,463 10,418 2,386 81% SPACE/FACILITIES RENTALS 153,200 148,448 122,882 30,318 80% BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 4,817 6,065 6,520 (1,703) 135% LEASES LONG-TERM 159,335 137,776 142,511 16,824 89% VENDING MACHINE/CONCESSION 5,500 6,779 10,397 (4,897) 189% OTHER RENTS & USE CHARGES 8,400 8,906 8,168 232 97% PARKS DONATIONS 9,100 9,700 11,541 (2,441) 127% BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 1,300 1,448 1,652 (352) 127% POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES - 9,231 - - 0% PARKS GRANTS - PRIVATE SOURCES - 1,235 - - 0% SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 1,200 1 110 1,090 9% SALES OF UNCLAIM PROPERTY 4,000 2,573 2,649 1,351 66% CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY - 1,249 - - 0% OTHER JUDGEMENT/SETTLEMENT - 6,367 2,867 (2,867) 0% POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION 477 150 984 (507) 206% CASHIER'S OVERAGES/SHORTAGES 45 62 164 (119) 364% OTHER MISC REVENUES 725,427 819 2,331 723,096 0% SMALL OVERPAYMENT 68 42 29 39 43% NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 150 210 120 30 80% NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 1,300 686 482 818 37% NSF FEES - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT - 150 - - - FLEX-PLAN SERVICES FORFEITURES - 1,368 - - - US BANK REBATE - - 1,557 (1,557) 0% 1,180,604 358,885 345,709 834,895 29% TRANSFERS-IN: PROCEEDS OF REFUNDING DEBT 2,763,315 - 2,763,314 1 100% TRANSFER FROM FUND 121 - 12,543 - - 0% TRANSFER FROM FUND 127 - 12,297 - - 0% 2,763,315 24,840 2,763,314 1 0% TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE 39,027,697$ 25,786,843$ 30,075,490$ 8,952,207$ 77% REVENUES - GENERAL FUND CITY OF EDMONDS Packet Page 116 of 433 Page 1 of 6 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) SALARIES AND WAGES 12,968,852$ 9,932,502$ 10,159,892$ 2,808,960$ 78% OVERT IME 425,123 350,661 348,708 76,415 82% HOLIDAY BUY BACK 201,026 3,481 2,409 198,617 1% BENEFITS 4,697,707 3,446,915 3,793,386 904,321 81% UNIFORMS 65,210 39,786 42,236 22,974 65% SUPPLIES 370,948 242,022 331,385 39,563 89% SMALL EQUIPMENT 157,583 87,350 259,301 (101,718) 165% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,424,874 1,391,548 1,630,736 794,138 67% COMMUNICATIONS 203,230 145,952 131,678 71,552 65% T RAVEL 33,685 15,113 20,246 13,439 60% ADVERTISING 57,375 19,963 21,171 36,204 37% RENTAL/LEASE 933,815 691,620 776,584 157,231 83% INSURANCE 379,784 397,566 383,906 (4,122) 101% UTILITIES 457,800 370,785 371,413 86,387 81% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 348,835 180,130 249,302 99,533 71% MISCELLANEOUS 354,066 245,117 223,777 130,289 63% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 8,316,935 7,707,192 7,737,747 579,188 93% INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 180,000 - - 180,000 0% EXCISE TAXES 6,452 4,538 5,152 1,300 80% INTERFUND TRANSFER 5,137,373 762,056 650,145 4,487,228 13% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 262,721 22,735 131,140 131,581 50% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 2,874,066 - 2,720,000 154,066 95% CAPITAL LEASES AND INSTALLMENT PURCHASES 64,654 64,014 64,654 0 100% OTHER DEBT - 478 479 (479) 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 85,400 93,776 55,016 30,384 64% DEBT ISSUE COST S - - 16,481 (16,481) 0% INTERFUND SERVICES 200,000 - 34,663 165,337 17% INTERFUND RENTAL - 40,000 - - 0% 41,207,514$ 26,255,302$ 30,161,608$ 11,045,906$ 73% LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE (009) BENEFITS 312,774$ 165,183$ 167,012$ 145,762$ 53% IN HOME LTC CLAIMS 183,337 86,058 71,758 111,579 39% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,000 6,081 - 7,000 0% MISCELLANEOUS 250 250 275 (25) 110% 503,361$ 257,572$ 239,045$ 264,316$ 47% RISK MANAGEMENT RESERVE FUND (011) MISCELLANEOUS 300,000$ 558,835$ -$ 300,000$ 0% 300,000$ 558,835$ -$ 300,000$ 0% HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND (014) SUPPLIES 100$ -$ -$ 100$ 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100 - - 100 0% ADVERTISING 100 - - 100 0% MISCELLANEOUS 7,700 5,280 - 7,700 0% 8,000$ 5,280$ -$ 8,000$ 0% BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUBFUND (016) SUPPLIES -$ 919$ 914$ (914)$ 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20,000 19,354 11,721 8,279 59% REPAIRS & MAINTENANENCE 668,200 68,100 61,653 606,547 9% MISCELLANEOUS - 1,865 395 (395) 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 32,000 - - 32,000 0% 720,200$ 90,238$ 74,683$ 645,517$ 10% DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND (104) FUEL CONSUMED 3,000$ 4,224$ 5,072$ (2,072)$ 169% SMALL EQUIPMENT 5,000 6,182 800 4,200 16% COMMUNICATIONS 2,233 2,819 2,325 (92) 104% REPAIR/MAINT 800 20 - 800 0% MISCELLANEOUS 20,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 25% INT ERGOVT L SVC 50,000 19,828 29,676 20,324 59% 81,033$ 38,073$ 42,872$ 38,161$ 53% EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL CITY OF EDMONDS Packet Page 117 of 433 Page 2 of 6 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent S TREET FUND (111) SALARIES AND WAGES 481,344$ 373,162$ 464,274$ 17,070$ 96% OVERT IME 21,400 14,367 20,163 1,237 94% BENEFITS 239,311 164,358 222,929 16,382 93% UNIFORMS 6,000 3,763 4,041 1,959 67% SUPPLIES 240,000 129,121 144,911 95,089 60% SMALL EQUIPMENT 26,000 120 8,332 17,668 32% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13,700 4,254 5,741 7,959 42% COMMUNICATIONS 2,500 2,395 3,585 (1,085) 143% T RAVEL 1,000 393 110 890 11% ADVERTISING 350 - - 350 0% RENTAL/LEASE 180,104 132,953 152,738 27,366 85% INSURANCE 82,400 87,201 74,683 7,717 91% UTILITIES 275,783 186,665 190,987 84,796 69% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 45,000 24,780 13,998 31,002 31% MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 1,050 3,006 4,994 38% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,000 1,179 1,956 44 98% INTERFUND TRANSFER 28,805 558 282 28,523 1% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 3,149 - - 3,149 0% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 1,964 1,037 982 982 50% 1,658,810$ 1,127,356$ 1,312,718$ 346,092$ 79% C O MBINED S TREET C O NS T/IMPRO VE (112) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,022,300$ 668,521$ 506,457$ 1,515,843$ 25% MISCELLANEOUS - 26,427 - - 0% INTERFUND TRANSFER OUT 387,043 41,498 41,301 345,742 11% LAND 373,000 - 336,437 36,563 90% CONST SURFACE CONST PROJECTS 6,274,297 277,044 1,331,438 4,942,859 21% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 72,203 72,201 72,201 2 100% INTEREST ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 4,120 4,479 4,118 2 100% INTERFUND SERVICES 501,703 116,005 278,656 223,047 56% 9,634,666$ 1,206,175$ 2,570,609$ 7,064,057$ 27% MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) SUPPLIES 4,200$ 5,616$ 2,794$ 1,406$ 67% SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,000 723 130 870 13% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 130,950 38,420 71,598 59,352 55% T RAVEL 75 54 11 65 14% ADVERTISING 4,000 2,250 2,555 1,445 64% RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 4,281 1,599 401 80% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 300 - - 300 0% MISCELLANEOUS 6,000 5,418 4,472 1,528 75% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 824 - - 824 0% 149,349$ 56,762$ 83,158$ 66,191$ 56% HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16,000$ 16,123$ 7,912$ 8,088$ 49% ADVERTISING 33,500 24,121 24,707 8,793 74% MISCELLANEOUS 500 157 - 500 0% INTERFUND TRANSFERS 4,000 12,000 2,000 2,000 50% 54,000$ 52,401$ 34,618$ 19,382$ 64% EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121) SUPPLIES 1,700$ 1,642$ -$ 1,700$ 0% SMALL EQUIPMENT - 555 - - 0% INTERFUND TRANSFERS - 12,543 - - 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,086 - - 25,086 0% 26,786$ 14,740$ -$ 26,786$ 0% YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) MISCELLANEOUS 3,600$ 3,293$ 1,658$ 1,942$ 46% 3,600$ 3,293$ 1,658$ 1,942$ 46% TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS (123) PROFESSIONAL SVC 10,500$ 5,347$ 800$ 9,700$ 8% ADVERTISING 4,500 3,905 2,475 2,025 55% MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 2,989 3,571 429 89% 19,000$ 12,240$ 6,846$ 12,154$ 36% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Packet Page 118 of 433 Page 3 of 6 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent REAL ES TATE EXC IS E TAX 2 (125) SUPPLIES 30,000$ 133,928$ 49,278$ (19,278)$ 164% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 400,000 20,214 21,631 378,369 5% ADVERTISING - 230 - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE - 3,399 11,492 (11,492) 0% UTILITIES - - 2,358 (2,358) 0% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 152,712 30,229 36,271 116,441 24% INTERFUND TRANSFER 800,000 - - 800,000 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 200,000 - 279 199,721 0% 1,582,712$ 188,002$ 121,309$ 1,461,403$ 8% REAL ES TATE EXC IS E TAX 1, PARKS AC Q (126) MISCELLANEOUS 200,000$ -$ 2,500$ 197,500$ 1% INTERFUND TRANSFER 959,528 26,071 22,204 937,324 2% LAND 10,550 - 10,473 77 99% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 18,330 - - 18,330 0% INTEREST 11,433 6,037 5,717 5,716 50% 1,199,841$ 32,108$ 40,893$ 1,158,948$ 3% GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) SUPPLIES 11,700$ 9,312$ 929$ 10,771$ 8% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,000 6,553 - 4,000 0% INTERFUND TRANSFER 2,500 12,297 2,500 - 100% 18,200$ 28,162$ 3,429$ 14,771$ 19% SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND (129) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,000$ 26,055 -$ 2,000$ 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS - 114,251 17,469 (17,469) 0% INTERFUND SERVICES 11,653 27,987 - 11,653 0% 13,653$ 168,293$ 17,469$ (3,816)$ 128% C EMETERY MAINTENANC E/IMPRO VEMENT (130) SALARIES AND WAGES 81,251$ 57,360$ 58,160$ 23,091$ 72% OVERT IME 3,500 2,391 3,403 97 97% BENEFITS 39,056 27,013 26,544 12,512 68% UNIFORMS 1,000 - - 1,000 0% SUPPLIES 7,000 1,635 2,366 4,634 34% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 20,000 10,575 15,609 4,391 78% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000 200 200 800 20% COMMUNICATIONS 1,412 1,180 1,257 155 89% T RAVEL 500 - - 500 0% ADVERTISING 3,200 3,155 1,717 1,483 54% RENTAL/LEASE 9,216 4,380 7,680 1,536 83% UTILITIES 3,800 - 554 3,246 15% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 1,994 2,861 1,139 72% 175,435$ 109,884$ 120,348$ 55,087$ 69% PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (132) SUPPLIES -$ -$ 427$ (427)$ 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (188,483) 63,582 111,983 (300,466) 0% LAND 700,000 - - 700,000 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 1,759,000 - 89,064 1,669,936 5% INTERFUND SERVICES - 1,114 - - 0% 2,270,517$ 64,696$ 201,474$ 2,069,043$ 9% SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) * SUPPLIES 500$ 222$ 99$ 401$ 20% T RAVEL 3,000 - 3,256 (256) 109% MISCELLANEOUS 1,000 668 1,637 (637) 164% 4,500$ 890$ 4,992$ (492)$ 111% TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT (139) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -$ 1,756$ -$ -$ 0% INSURANCE 5,000 5,000 2,500 2,500 50% INTERFUND TRANSFER - 553,410 - - 0% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 640,000 - 566,875 73,125 89% 645,000$ 560,166$ 569,375$ 75,625$ 88% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL *A budget amendment will be completed for this expense Packet Page 119 of 433 Page 4 of 6 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent LID FUND CONTROL (211) INTERFUND TRANSFER 28,600$ -$ -$ 28,600$ 0% 28,600$ -$ -$ 28,600$ 0% 2012 LTGO DEBT SERVIC FUND (231) GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 854,667$ -$ -$ 854,667$ 0% INTEREST 168,023 92,264 84,010 84,013 50% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - - 604 (604) 0% 1,022,690$ 92,264$ 84,614$ 938,076$ 8% 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUND (232) GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 923,199$ -$ -$ 923,199$ 0% INTEREST 23,105 - 9,211 13,894 40% DEBT ISSUE COST S 19,982 - - 19,982 0% 966,286$ -$ 9,211$ 957,075$ 1% WATER FUND (421) SALARIES AND WAGES 677,172$ 600,842$ 609,585$ 67,587$ 90% OVERT IME 24,180 17,972 12,847 11,333 53% BENEFITS 326,137 252,810 276,781 49,356 85% UNIFORMS 6,800 3,859 3,060 3,740 45% SUPPLIES 151,838 86,804 103,261 48,577 68% FUEL CONSUMED - - - - 0% WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 1,600,000 1,190,362 1,183,848 416,152 74% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 130,816 83,840 108,659 22,157 83% SMALL EQUIPMENT 25,161 6,669 15,167 9,994 60% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 575,468 240,529 242,811 332,657 42% COMMUNICATIONS 35,000 24,893 23,790 11,210 68% T RAVEL 2,600 54 65 2,535 3% ADVERTISING 500 - - 500 0% RENTAL/LEASE 104,820 76,967 89,492 15,328 85% INSURANCE 66,869 67,607 74,689 (7,820) 112% UTILITIES 40,000 24,165 23,598 16,402 59% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 17,600 3,193 11,586 6,014 66% MISCELLANEOUS 307,880 281,374 323,794 (15,914) 105% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 30,000 23,496 26,306 3,694 88% INTERFUND TAXES 920,881 791,314 867,773 53,108 94% INTERFUND TRANSFER 292,830 - 120,415 172,415 41% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 49,849 49,849 - 49,849 0% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 3,614,973 1,279,394 1,139,389 2,475,584 32% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 2,115 - - 2,115 0% REVENUE BONDS 306,140 - - 306,140 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 45,839 45,839 45,839 0 100% INTEREST 275,912 140,928 138,667 137,245 50% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 175 327 (327) 0% INTERFUND SERVICES 514,096 360,099 394,690 119,406 77% INTERFUND REPAIR/MAINT - 48 - - 0% 10,145,476$ 5,653,079$ 5,836,439$ 4,309,037$ 58% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Packet Page 120 of 433 Page 5 of 6 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent STORM FUND (422) SALARIES AND WAGES 594,775$ 424,783$ 389,093$ 205,682$ 65% OVERT IME 6,000 10,766 10,997 (4,997) 183% BENEFITS 258,745 179,802 180,188 78,557 70% UNIFORMS 6,500 5,342 4,493 2,007 69% SUPPLIES 58,333 25,966 24,749 33,584 42% SMALL EQUIPMENT 4,000 2,266 965 3,035 24% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,548,909 629,777 548,427 1,000,482 35% COMMUNICATIONS 3,200 1,608 2,731 469 85% T RAVEL 4,300 864 - 4,300 0% ADVERTISING 500 - - 500 0% RENTAL/LEASE 213,612 179,805 174,099 39,513 82% INSURANCE 8,089 8,407 36,035 (27,946) 445% UTILITES 10,500 6,925 7,138 3,362 68% REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 13,000 6,129 7,301 5,699 56% MISCELLANEOUS 112,100 78,085 82,156 29,944 73% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 75,000 22,202 104,056 (29,056) 139% INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 295,973 247,438 258,550 37,423 87% INTERFUND TRANSFER 54,291 - 22,304 31,987 41% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,881,712 - 598,363 2,283,349 21% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 105,461 - - 105,461 0% REVENUE BONDS 149,691 - - 149,691 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 32,063 32,063 32,063 1 100% INTEREST 182,178 94,584 91,970 90,208 50% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 83 165 (165) 0% INTERFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 614,281 465,819 504,545 109,736 82% 7,233,213$ 2,422,712$ 3,080,386$ 4,152,827$ 43% SEWER FUND (423) SALARIES AND WAGES 1,650,330$ 1,270,218$ 1,356,110$ 294,220$ 82% OVERT IME 73,000 77,926 68,946 4,054 94% BENEFITS 760,694 535,272 621,523 139,171 82% UNIFORMS 11,400 7,888 7,061 4,339 62% SUPPLIES 399,333 224,848 200,303 199,030 50% FUEL CONSUMED 90,000 115,104 75,687 14,313 84% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE - - 3,600 (3,600) 0% SMALL EQUIPMENT 26,000 14,168 36,877 (10,877) 142% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,120,739 831,299 621,311 499,428 55% COMMUNICATIONS 40,000 29,733 32,314 7,686 81% T RAVEL 7,400 380 893 6,507 12% ADVERTISING 2,500 - - 2,500 0% RENTAL/LEASE 149,968 109,733 122,413 27,555 82% INSURANCE 155,006 156,092 128,938 26,068 83% UTILITIES 1,170,600 745,015 831,635 338,965 71% REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 175,000 130,857 146,706 28,294 84% MISCELLANEOUS 217,935 164,312 187,193 30,742 86% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 408,889 95,604 97,902 310,987 24% INTERFUND TAXES AND OPERATING ASSESSMENT 479,750 395,040 434,640 45,110 91% INTERFUND TRANSFERS 1,198,470 157,651 573,188 625,282 48% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 449,500 - 21,270 428,230 5% CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 4,837,535 4,777,663 2,471,801 2,365,734 51% GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 120,529 - - 120,529 0% REVENUE BONDS 69,169 - - 69,169 0% INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 203,621 143,620 162,736 40,885 80% INTEREST 149,971 69,705 64,958 85,013 43% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 41 1,280 (1,280) 0% INTERFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 868,499 496,275 545,938 322,561 63% 14,835,838$ 10,548,444$ 8,815,223$ 6,020,615$ 59% BOND RESERVE FUND (424) REVENUE BONDS 160,000$ -$ -$ 160,000$ 0% DEBT ISSUE COST S - 24,760 - - 0% INTEREST 680,816 - 340,408 340,409 50% OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS - 57,335 - - 0% 840,816$ 82,095$ 340,408$ 500,409$ 40% EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL CITY OF EDMONDS Packet Page 121 of 433 Page 6 of 6 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) SALARIES AND WAGES 203,962$ 146,169$ 160,963$ 42,999$ 79% OVERT IME 1,000 886 2,309 (1,309) 231% BENEFITS 89,965 66,060 74,403 15,562 83% UNIFORMS 1,000 620 925 75 93% SUPPLIES 96,500 83,658 69,001 27,499 72% FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - 708 292 71% SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 361,700 181,246 181,206 180,494 50% SMALL EQUIPMENT 8,000 20,277 12,555 (4,555) 157% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000 1,872 715 285 72% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 1,180 1,689 1,311 56% RENTAL/LEASE 14,484 7,742 11,482 3,002 79% INSURANCE 32,701 34,153 37,376 (4,675) 114% UTILITIES 14,000 8,923 9,135 4,865 65% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 60,000 36,944 48,604 11,396 81% MISCELLANEOUS 6,000 4,773 4,441 1,559 74% INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 2,500 1,572 2,408 92 96% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 186,467 108,999 163,749 22,718 88% INTERFUND RENTAL 10,000 - 6,089 3,911 61% 1,093,279$ 705,074$ 787,759$ 305,520$ 72% FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND (617) BENEFITS 49,619$ 20,892$ 21,762$ 27,857$ 44% PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 38,796 46,681 23,700 15,096 61% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,200 1,169 - 1,200 0% 89,615$ 68,743$ 45,462$ 44,153$ 51% BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND (627) SUPPLIES -$ 65$ 2,032$ (2,032)$ 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 225 41,110 (41,110) 0% ADVERTISING 88 MISCELLANEOUS - 411 2,558 (2,558) 0% -$ 789$ 45,700$ (45,700)$ 0% TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS 96,531,990$ 50,403,669$ 54,652,307$ 41,879,683$ 57% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Packet Page 122 of 433 Page 1 of 1 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent CITY COUNCIL 238,644$ 224,897$ 181,581$ 57,063$ 76% OFFICE OF MAYOR 251,085 196,439 203,639 47,446 81% HUMAN RESOURCES 349,938 217,020 274,401 75,537 78% MUNICIPAL COURT 801,872 601,609 652,008 149,864 81% CITY CLERK 537,273 495,285 428,531 108,742 80% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1,781,070 1,107,466 1,384,236 396,834 78% CITY ATTORNEY 557,900 396,560 453,910 103,990 81% NON-DEPARTMENTAL 1 17,816,558 8,917,486 11,971,534 5,845,024 67% POLICE SERVICES 8,824,364 7,221,628 7,019,012 1,805,352 80% COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECONOMIC DEV.508,024 296,034 348,588 159,436 69% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 2,219,366 1,289,790 1,505,679 713,687 68% PARKS & RECREATION 3,826,916 2,814,463 2,931,567 895,349 77% PUBLIC WORKS 2,088,677 1,398,895 1,634,296 454,381 78% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 1,405,827 1,077,731 1,172,625 233,202 83% 41,207,514$ 26,255,302$ 30,161,608$ 11,045,906$ 73% Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent WATER UTILITY FUND 10,145,476$ 5,653,079$ 5,836,439$ 4,309,037$ 58% STORM UTILITY FUND 7,233,213 2,422,712 3,080,386 4,152,827 43% SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 14,835,838 10,548,444 8,815,223 6,020,615 59% BOND RESERVE FUND 840,816 82,095 340,408 500,409 40% 33,055,343$ 18,706,330$ 18,072,455$ 14,982,888$ 55% EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY CITY OF EDMONDS CITY OF EDMONDS 1 Bond payment of $2.7 million was made in April of 2014 No Department is over budget and General Fund Expenses are tracking at 73% when 83% of the year is completed Packet Page 123 of 433 Page 1 of 4 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent CITY COUNCIL SALARIES 117,615$ 99,401$ 103,489$ 14,126$ 88% OVERT IME 2,000 500 124 1,876 6% BENEFITS 72,271 59,151 62,589 9,682 87% SUPPLIES 2,000 151 487 1,513 24% SMALL EQUIPMENT - - 1,005 (1,005) 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,000 49,958 521 9,479 5% COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 2,341 2,408 592 80% T RAVEL 2,500 591 1,431 1,069 57% RENTAL/LEASE 490 384 426 64 87% REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE 1,500 55 - 1,500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 27,268 12,366 9,101 18,167 33% 238,644$ 224,897$ 181,581$ 57,063$ 76% OFFICE OF MAYOR SALARIES 192,115$ 154,988$ 159,512$ 32,603$ 83% BENEFITS 46,170 35,378 37,354 8,816 81% SUPPLIES 2,000 1,038 603 1,397 30% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,500 59 1,154 346 77% COMMUNICATION 1,400 765 565 835 40% T RAVEL 2,000 664 438 1,562 22% RENTAL/LEASE 2,400 1,843 1,996 404 83% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 3,000 1,704 2,017 983 67% 251,085$ 196,439$ 203,639$ 47,446$ 81% HUMAN RESOURCES SALARIES 194,389$ 136,574$ 160,799$ 33,590$ 83% BENEFITS 59,339 40,987 54,640 4,699 92% SUPPLIES 2,300 3,382 2,866 (566) 125% SMALL EQUIPMENT 100 - 337 (237) 337% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 71,000 21,315 41,031 29,969 58% COMMUNICATIONS 700 386 764 (64) 109% T RAVEL 500 572 - 500 0% ADVERTISING 5,000 2,907 3,438 1,563 69% RENTAL/LEASE 2,200 1,844 1,998 202 91% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 6,000 5,349 6,119 (119) 102% MISCELLANEOUS 8,410 3,704 2,411 5,999 29% 349,938$ 217,020$ 274,401$ 75,537$ 78% MUNICIPAL COURT SALARIES 500,048$ 391,633$ 430,221$ 69,827$ 86% OVERT IME - 16 2,590 (2,590) 0% BENEFITS 177,004 129,760 141,396 35,608 80% SUPPLIES 9,400 12,009 9,909 (509) 105% SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,500 1,567 240 2,260 10% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 69,000 54,197 48,181 20,819 70% COMMUNICATIONS 2,600 1,819 2,373 227 91% T RAVEL 2,390 1,686 2,690 (300) 113% RENTAL/LEASE 1,070 927 1,063 7 99% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 610 409 3,242 (2,632) 531% MISCELLANEOUS 37,250 7,587 10,104 27,146 27% 801,872$ 601,609$ 652,008$ 149,864$ 81% EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL CITY OF EDMONDS Packet Page 124 of 433 Page 2 of 4 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent C ITY C LERK SALARIES AND WAGES 307,596$ 303,075$ 253,392$ 54,204$ 82% OVERT IME - - 1,206 (1,206) 0% BENEFITS 101,833 84,800 85,758 16,075 84% SUPPLIES 10,237 6,802 6,161 4,076 60% SMALL EQUIPMENT - 1,010 - - 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 24,107 35,321 17,833 6,274 74% COMMUNICATIONS 50,000 36,662 33,200 16,800 66% T RAVEL 1,000 57 204 796 20% ADVERTISING 4,200 2,940 1,505 2,695 36% RENTAL/LEASE 20,000 13,338 15,677 4,323 78% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 14,300 8,210 10,426 3,874 73% MISCELLANEOUS 4,000 3,070 3,168 832 79% 537,273$ 495,285$ 428,531$ 108,742$ 80% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SALARIES 754,909$ 567,992$ 613,597$ 141,312$ 81% OVERT IME 6,667 6,470 6,140 527 92% BENEFITS 251,163 180,612 212,541 38,622 85% SUPPLIES 30,371 12,931 63,021 (32,650) 208% SMALL EQUIPMENT 80,504 65,476 167,391 (86,887) 208% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 150,356 95,789 27,037 123,319 18% COMMUNICATIONS 58,960 42,463 31,400 27,560 53% T RAVEL 1,750 1,017 960 790 55% RENTAL/LEASE 8,904 7,045 6,701 2,203 75% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 179,986 80,192 117,627 62,359 65% MISCELLANEOUS 10,500 24,746 22,403 (11,903) 213% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 247,000 22,735 115,419 131,581 47% 1,781,070$ 1,107,466$ 1,384,236$ 396,834$ 78% C ITY ATTO RNEY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 557,900$ 396,560$ 453,860$ 104,040$ 81% MISC PROSECUTOR - - 50 (50) 0% 557,900$ 396,560$ 453,910$ 103,990$ 81% NON-DEPARTMENTAL SALARIES 278,171$ -$ -$ 278,171$ 0% BENEFITS - UNEMPLOYMENT 25,000 24,754 12,410 12,590 50% SUPPLIES 3,000 - 1,429 1,571 48% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 287,347 176,351 268,945 18,402 94% RENTAL/LEASE 3,600 3,600 3,600 - 100% INSURANCE 379,784 397,566 383,906 (4,122) 101% MISCELLANEOUS 55,708 54,993 57,960 (2,252) 104% INT ERGOVT SERVICES 8,236,003 7,335,359 7,696,694 539,309 93% ECA LOAN PAYMENT 180,000 - - 180,000 0% EXCISE TAXES 6,452 4,538 5,152 1,300 80% INTERFUND TRANSFERS 5,137,373 762,056 650,145 4,487,228 13% GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 2,874,066 - 2,720,000 154,066 95% INSTALLMENT PURCHASES 64,654 64,014 64,654 0 100% INTEREST ON LONG-TERM DEBT 85,400 93,776 55,016 30,384 64% DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS - - 16,481 (16,481) 0% FISCAL AGENT FEES - 478 479 (479) 0% INTERFUND SERVICES 200,000 - 34,663 165,337 17% 17,816,558$ 8,917,486$ 11,971,534$ 5,845,024$ 67% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Packet Page 125 of 433 Page 3 of 4 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent PO LIC E S ERVIC ES SALARIES 5,263,948$ 4,239,950$ 4,271,820$ 992,128$ 81% OVERT IME 402,456 334,574 317,430 85,026 79% HOLIDAY BUYBACK 201,026 3,481 2,409 198,617 1% BENEFITS 1,962,070 1,494,878 1,646,128 315,942 84% UNIFORMS 56,910 35,134 34,413 22,497 60% SUPPLIES 87,500 54,426 59,015 28,485 67% SMALL EQUIPMENT 15,900 13,293 29,783 (13,883) 187% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 114,287 132,923 83,362 30,925 73% COMMUNICATIONS 25,592 18,581 19,798 5,794 77% T RAVEL 14,300 8,664 10,501 3,799 73% ADVERTISING 375 73 40 335 11% RENTAL/LEASE 608,688 446,273 505,518 103,170 83% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 16,115 6,449 5,531 10,584 34% MISCELLANEOUS 44,960 26,097 28,147 16,813 63% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 10,237 366,833 5,119 5,119 50% INTERFUND RENTAL - 40,000 - - 0% 8,824,364$ 7,221,628$ 7,019,012$ 1,805,352$ 80% COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV. SALARIES 216,742$ 177,972$ 189,724$ 27,018$ 88% BENEFITS 68,668 52,949 48,521 20,147 71% SUPPLIES 1,500 682 6,232 (4,732) 415% SMALL EQUIPMENT 800 - - 800 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145,824 49,591 90,244 55,580 62% COMMUNICATIONS 1,490 1,217 625 865 42% T RAVEL 2,000 144 6 1,994 0% ADVERTISING 39,500 8,297 8,477 31,023 21% RENTAL/LEASE 2,000 2,144 1,998 2 100% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 500 - - 500 0% MISCELLANEOUS 29,000 3,037 2,760 26,240 10% 508,024$ 296,034$ 348,588$ 159,436$ 69% DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PLANNING SALARIES 1,273,306$ 871,430$ 939,192$ 334,114$ 74% OVERT IME 1,300 1,144 5,044 (3,744) 388% BENEFITS 465,402 305,704 338,615 126,787 73% UNIFORMS 100 - 120 (20) 120% SUPPLIES 13,100 8,997 13,255 (155) 101% SMALL EQUIPMENT 8,650 359 7,130 1,520 82% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 383,256 52,590 142,730 240,526 37% COMMUNICATIONS 4,600 3,391 3,587 1,013 78% T RAVEL 1,600 45 1,899 (299) 119% ADVERTISING 4,000 3,264 4,539 (539) 113% RENTAL/LEASE 38,152 27,474 31,819 6,333 83% REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 500 112 620 (120) 124% MISCELLANEOUS 25,400 15,279 17,128 8,272 67% 2,219,366$ 1,289,790$ 1,505,679$ 713,687$ 68% ENGINEERING SALARIES 1,203,904$ 804,575$ 914,823$ 289,081$ 76% OVERT IME 5,000 1,199 505 4,495 10% BENEFITS 423,053 296,082 361,810 61,243 86% UNIFORMS 360 - 109 251 30% SMALL EQUIPMENT 2,200 766 2,052 148 93% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 52,950 840 36,886 16,064 70% COMMUNICATIONS 11,220 4,684 5,434 5,786 48% T RAVEL 600 52 86 514 14% ADVERTISING - 264 - - 0% RENTAL/LEASE 18,492 11,170 15,410 3,082 83% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,800 38 699 1,101 39% MISCELLANEOUS 15,000 7,089 12,118 2,882 81% 1,734,579$ 1,126,760$ 1,349,933$ 384,646$ 78% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Packet Page 126 of 433 Page 4 of 4 Title 2014 Adopted Budget 10/31/2013 Expenditures 10/31/2014 Expenditures Amount Remaining % Spent PARKS & RECREATION SALARIES 1,823,252$ 1,462,908$ 1,393,235$ 430,017$ 76% OVERT IME 5,000 6,614 13,361 (8,361) 267% BENEFITS 668,116 488,102 505,442 162,674 76% UNIFORMS 5,340 3,466 4,985 355 93% SUPPLIES 114,940 86,428 99,978 14,962 87% SMALL EQUIPMENT 43,929 1,959 42,658 1,271 97% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 557,147 326,011 416,772 140,375 75% COMMUNICATIONS 28,818 21,690 18,510 10,308 64% T RAVEL 4,545 1,621 2,005 2,540 44% ADVERTISING 4,300 2,218 3,172 1,128 74% RENTAL/LEASE 170,019 134,238 143,434 26,585 84% PUBLIC UTILITY 175,000 156,455 140,472 34,528 80% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 52,524 34,731 45,055 7,469 86% MISCELLANEOUS 87,570 83,022 50,833 36,737 58% MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 15,721 - 15,721 0 100% INTERGOVTL SERVICES 70,695 5,000 35,934 34,761 51% 3,826,916$ 2,814,463$ 2,931,567$ 895,349$ 77% PUBLIC WORKS SALARIES 250,358$ 204,033$ 208,305$ 42,053$ 83% OVERT IME 200 - - 200 0% BENEFITS 78,450 55,813 61,797 16,653 79% SUPPLIES 7,600 4,247 4,167 3,433 55% SMALL EQUIPMENT - 201 583 (583) 0% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 45 154 46 77% COMMUNICATIONS 1,350 1,166 627 723 46% T RAVEL 500 - - 500 0% RENTAL/LEASE 7,740 3,613 5,201 2,539 67% PUBLIC UTILITY 2,800 1,822 1,878 922 67% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 1,000 - - 1,000 0% MISCELLANEOUS 3,900 1,194 1,651 2,249 42% 354,098$ 272,136$ 284,363$ 69,735$ 80% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SALARIES 624,999 517,972 521,785 103,214 83% OVERT IME 2,500 145 2,309 191 92% BENEFITS 266,668 197,944 224,385 42,283 84% UNIFORMS 2,500 1,187 2,607 (107) 104% SUPPLIES 87,000 50,929 64,261 22,739 74% SMALL EQUIPMENT 3,000 2,719 8,122 (5,122) 271% PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - - 2,026 (2,026) 0% COMMUNICATIONS 13,500 10,786 12,387 1,113 92% T RAVEL - - 27 (27) 0% RENTAL/LEASE 50,060 37,725 41,744 8,316 83% PUBLIC UTILITY 280,000 212,508 229,062 50,938 82% REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 73,500 44,586 59,983 13,517 82% MISCELLANEOUS 2,100.00 1,230.20 3,926.37 (1,826.37) 1.87 1,405,827$ 1,077,731$ 1,172,625$ 233,202$ 83% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES 41,207,514$ 26,255,302 30,161,608 11,045,906 73% CITY OF EDMONDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL Packet Page 127 of 433 Packet Page 128 of 433 General Fund Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 1,923,425$ 1,923,425$ 1,704,062$ -11.40% February 4,016,229 2,092,803 6,617,557 64.77% aarch 6,287,135 2,270,906 8,899,880 41.56% April 9,630,968 3,343,834 12,575,092 30.57% aay 18,195,151 8,564,183 19,617,376 7.82% June 20,107,912 1,912,761 21,270,138 5.78% July 22,334,628 2,226,716 23,438,395 4.94% August 24,282,814 1,948,186 25,327,825 4.30% September 26,192,139 1,909,324 27,168,450 3.73% October 29,332,410 3,140,271 30,075,490 2.53% November 37,045,071 7,712,661 37,983,536 2.53% December 39,027,697 1,982,626 40,016,389 2.53% *The difference between budget and actual shown is due to proceeds from refunding the 2003 UTGO Bonds. Proceeds were $2.8 million. Real Estate Excise Tax Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 74,651$ 74,651$ 92,868$ 24.40% February 120,737 46,087 149,163 23.54% aarch 181,397 60,660 204,533 12.75% April 256,711 75,314 261,931 2.03% aay 323,837 67,125 326,172 0.72% June 398,387 74,550 410,270 2.98% July 483,191 84,805 559,760 15.85% August 578,011 94,819 666,423 15.30% September 666,060 88,049 746,012 12.00% October 768,001 101,941 809,086 5.35% November 837,495 69,494 882,298 5.35% December 902,243 64,748 950,510 5.35% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-General Fund 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Revenue Summary-Real Estate Excise Tax Packet Page 129 of 433 ($100,000)($50,000)$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 Amusement & Recreation Clothing and Accessories Automotive Repair Health & Personal Care Accommodation Communications Wholesale Trade Business Services Retail Food Stores Misc Retail Trade Others Retail Eating & Drinking Contractors Retail Automotive/Gas Total ($74,509) ($10,560) ($2,149) $1,103 $3,685 $3,908 $9,289 $16,495 $25,241 $44,181 $45,366 $54,686 $101,098 $213,845 $431,679 Change in Sales Tax Revenue: October 2014 compared to October 2013 Packet Page 130 of 433 Retail Eating & Drinking 603,965 Contractors 706,479 Wholesale Trade 192,172 Communications 178,046 Misc Retail Trade 568,456 Accommodation 33,534 Business Services 324,477 Health & Personal Care 78,227 Automotive Repair 130,317 Amusement & Recreation 58,909 Retail Food Stores 213,897 Others 245,135 Retail Automotive/Gas 1,301,146 Clothing and Accessories 169,134 Sales Tax Analysis By Category Current Period: October 2014 Year -to-Date Total $4,803,894 Packet Page 131 of 433 Packet Page 132 of 433 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 428,831$ 428,831$ 444,169$ 3.58% February 963,323 534,493 998,510 3.65% aarch 1,363,952 400,629 1,477,603 8.33% April 1,763,418 399,466 1,870,619 6.08% aay 2,251,403 487,985 2,371,435 5.33% June 2,687,897 436,495 2,812,288 4.63% July 3,127,170 439,272 3,276,565 4.78% August 3,623,461 496,291 3,769,832 4.04% September 4,086,398 462,937 4,267,681 4.44% October 4,563,331 476,933 4,803,894 5.27% November 5,078,747 515,416 5,346,480 5.27% December 5,525,609 446,862 5,816,899 5.27% Gas Utility Tax Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 113,876$ 113,876$ 103,199$ -9.38% February 239,319 125,442 198,165 -17.20% aarch 342,980 103,661 298,299 -13.03% April 436,459 93,479 376,839 -13.66% aay 512,262 75,803 435,966 -14.89% June 565,759 53,498 474,528 -16.13% July 607,696 41,937 504,520 -16.98% August 638,725 31,029 528,960 -17.19% September 666,716 27,990 551,417 -17.29% October 696,005 29,289 577,044 -17.09% November 746,459 50,453 618,874 -17.09% December 819,286 72,827 679,254 -17.09% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Revenue Summary-Sales and Use Tax 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Revenue Summary-Gas Utility Tax Packet Page 133 of 433 Packet Page 134 of 433 Packet Page 135 of 433 Telephone Utility Tax Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 126,925$ 126,925$ 120,158$ -5.33% February 249,682 122,757 248,366 -0.53% aarch 386,065 136,384 359,490 -6.88% April 499,602 113,536 470,135 -5.90% aay 645,057 145,456 581,203 -9.90% June 768,223 123,165 692,449 -9.86% July 895,235 127,013 803,786 -10.22% August 1,037,189 141,953 912,478 -12.02% September 1,143,101 105,912 1,022,001 -10.59% October 1,286,698 143,597 1,127,973 -12.34% November 1,381,314 94,616 1,210,917 -12.34% December 1,544,793 163,479 1,354,230 -12.34% Electric Utility Tax Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 158,918$ 158,918$ 175,072$ 10.16% February 320,172 161,254 352,390 10.06% aarch 475,954 155,782 534,485 12.30% April 631,990 156,035 690,245 9.22% aay 774,898 142,908 839,998 8.40% June 885,438 110,541 948,700 7.14% July 991,385 105,947 1,055,702 6.49% August 1,087,004 95,619 1,156,363 6.38% September 1,187,503 100,499 1,255,624 5.74% October 1,274,792 87,289 1,353,054 6.14% November 1,383,012 108,220 1,467,917 6.14% December 1,490,394 107,382 1,581,892 6.14% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Revenue Summary-Telephone Utility Tax 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Revenue Summary-Electric Utility Tax Packet Page 136 of 433 Packet Page 137 of 433 Packet Page 138 of 433 Meter Water Sales Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 429,754$ 429,754$ 489,005$ 13.79% February 729,586 299,832 828,145 13.51% aarch 1,147,622 418,036 1,294,140 12.77% April 1,435,683 288,061 1,607,107 11.94% aay 1,858,183 422,500 2,073,689 11.60% June 2,169,885 311,702 2,434,321 12.19% July 2,657,881 487,996 3,003,419 13.00% August 3,086,188 428,307 3,496,156 13.28% September 3,680,575 594,387 4,176,682 13.48% October 4,108,457 427,882 4,640,322 12.95% November 4,610,786 502,330 5,207,681 12.95% December 4,924,500 313,714 5,562,007 12.95% Storm Water Sales Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 210,362$ 210,362$ 216,037$ 10.16% February 663,443 453,081 680,744 10.06% aarch 874,097 210,654 896,910 12.30% April 1,061,161 187,064 1,089,565 9.22% aay 1,272,188 211,026 1,305,756 8.40% June 1,459,452 187,265 1,498,017 7.14% July 1,671,872 212,419 1,716,475 2.67% August 2,138,683 466,812 2,180,039 1.93% September 2,356,833 218,149 2,395,835 1.65% October 2,549,604 192,771 2,587,716 1.49% November 2,766,495 216,890 2,807,849 1.49% December 2,959,725 193,230 3,003,968 1.49% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Revenue Summary-aeter Water Sales 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Revenue Summary-Storm Water Sales Packet Page 139 of 433 Packet Page 140 of 433 Packet Page 141 of 433 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 434,795$ 434,795$ 479,087$ 10.19% February 786,497 351,702 860,724 9.44% aarch 1,218,216 431,719 1,335,216 9.60% April 1,568,380 350,165 1,717,700 9.52% aay 2,004,398 436,018 2,195,896 9.55% June 2,358,600 354,202 2,584,030 9.56% July 2,803,274 444,674 3,069,159 9.48% August 3,161,173 357,899 3,458,097 9.39% September 3,614,263 453,090 3,950,493 9.30% October 3,973,096 358,833 4,346,368 9.40% November 4,416,998 443,903 4,831,975 9.40% December 4,773,750 356,752 5,222,244 9.40% City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Revenue Summary-Unmeter Sewer Sales 2014 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. Packet Page 142 of 433 Packet Page 143 of 433 Packet Page 144 of 433 General Fund Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 4,343,460$ 4,343,460$ 4,116,199$ -5.23% February 7,274,523 2,931,063 5,980,774 -17.78% aarch 10,375,435 3,100,912 9,514,450 -8.30% April 14,048,683 3,673,248 14,163,986 0.82% aay 16,397,414 2,348,731 16,009,991 -2.36% June 20,183,777 3,786,363 18,147,195 -10.09% July 23,901,612 3,717,835 20,853,841 -12.75% August 26,841,897 2,940,285 24,534,694 -8.60% September 30,680,267 3,838,371 28,291,461 -7.79% October 33,412,751 2,732,484 30,161,609 -9.73% November 36,453,396 3,040,644 32,906,391 -9.73% December 41,207,514 4,754,118 37,197,922 -9.73% Non-Departmental Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 3,046,994$ 3,046,994$ 2,396,214$ -21.36% February 3,819,399 772,406 2,563,640 -32.88% aarch 4,915,567 1,096,167 4,388,210 -10.73% April 6,635,958 1,720,391 7,277,792 9.67% aay 6,858,732 222,774 7,363,650 7.36% June 8,994,349 2,135,617 7,709,624 -14.28% July 10,657,021 1,662,672 8,424,155 -20.95% August 11,282,941 625,920 10,027,805 -11.12% September 13,215,690 1,932,750 11,863,833 -10.23% October 13,781,945 566,255 11,971,534 -13.14% November 14,383,939 601,995 12,494,450 -13.14% December 17,692,258 3,308,319 15,368,185 -13.14% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-General Fund 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-Non-Departmental Packet Page 145 of 433 Packet Page 146 of 433 Packet Page 147 of 433 City Council Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 17,436$ 17,436$ 14,710$ -15.64% February 37,196 19,760 29,242 -21.38% aarch 56,930 19,734 46,539 -18.25% April 74,661 17,731 65,481 -12.29% aay 91,717 17,056 85,284 -7.01% June 111,368 19,651 110,659 -0.64% July 133,849 22,481 129,296 -3.40% August 154,203 20,355 145,411 -5.70% September 171,728 17,524 164,792 -4.04% October 193,996 22,268 181,581 -6.40% November 214,250 20,254 200,539 -6.40% December 238,644 24,394 223,372 -6.40% Office of Mayor Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 21,493$ 21,493$ 19,866$ -7.57% February 42,845$ 21,353$ 40,990 -4.33% aarch 63,933$ 21,088$ 61,132 -4.38% April 84,211$ 20,278$ 82,041 -2.58% aay 104,565$ 20,354$ 102,277 -2.19% June 125,279$ 20,714$ 122,235 -2.43% July 146,686$ 21,408$ 143,210 -2.37% August 167,273$ 20,586$ 163,382 -2.33% September 187,312$ 20,039$ 183,379 -2.10% October 209,955$ 22,643$ 203,635 -3.01% November 231,093$ 21,138$ 224,137 -3.01% December 251,085$ 19,992$ 243,527 -3.01% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-City Council 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-Office of aayor Packet Page 148 of 433 Packet Page 149 of 433 Packet Page 150 of 433 Human Resources Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 25,798$ 25,798$ 27,275$ 5.72% February 52,555 26,756 60,853 15.79% aarch 84,843 32,288 88,106 3.85% April 114,019 29,176 112,767 -1.10% aay 143,795 29,775 142,206 -1.10% June 171,136 27,342 172,043 0.53% July 199,812 28,676 199,033 -0.39% August 225,905 26,093 228,816 1.29% September 257,927 32,022 251,736 -2.40% October 285,341 27,413 274,401 -3.83% November 310,098 24,757 298,209 -3.83% December 349,938 39,840 336,522 -3.83% Municipal Court Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 59,240$ 59,240$ 58,367$ -1.47% February 125,452 66,212 116,841 -6.86% aarch 193,525 68,074 198,204 2.42% April 262,436 68,911 257,767 -1.78% aay 327,513 65,077 320,047 -2.28% June 396,410 68,897 384,624 -2.97% July 459,812 63,402 451,412 -1.83% August 527,281 67,468 516,393 -2.06% September 590,660 63,379 584,516 -1.04% October 658,527 67,868 652,008 -0.99% November 725,443 66,915 718,261 -0.99% December 801,872 76,429 793,934 -0.99% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-Human Resources 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-aunicipal Court Packet Page 151 of 433 Packet Page 152 of 433 Packet Page 153 of 433 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 31,471$ 31,471$ 24,299$ -22.79% February 80,480 49,009 54,146 -32.72% aarch 121,436 40,956 83,578 -31.18% April 161,422 39,986 160,955 -0.29% aay 203,742 42,320 177,081 -13.09% June 240,317 36,574 200,183 -16.70% July 291,509 51,193 227,071 -22.11% August 327,786 36,277 262,287 -19.98% September 366,394 38,607 302,425 -17.46% October 408,391 41,998 348,588 -14.64% November 444,482 36,090 379,394 -14.64% December 508,024 63,542 433,631 -14.64% City Clerk Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 39,751$ 39,751$ 40,227$ 1.20% February 81,417 41,666 85,455 4.96% aarch 128,867 47,450 127,044 -1.41% April 170,636 41,769 164,667 -3.50% aay 217,171 46,535 209,795 -3.40% June 257,997 40,826 246,693 -4.38% July 303,101 45,105 290,408 -4.19% August 347,896 44,795 334,638 -3.81% September 395,264 47,368 380,235 -3.80% October 442,040 46,776 428,531 -3.06% November 489,440 47,400 474,483 -3.06% December 537,273 47,833 520,854 -3.06% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-Community Services/Economic Development 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-City Clerk Packet Page 154 of 433 Packet Page 155 of 433 Packet Page 156 of 433 Information Services Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 74,773$ 74,773$ 58,589$ -21.64% February 168,007 93,233 139,016 -17.26% aarch 244,125 76,118 181,347 -25.72% April 314,480 70,355 227,941 -27.52% aay 385,147 70,667 256,132 -33.50% June 448,960 63,813 291,238 -35.13% July 505,646 56,687 443,744 -12.24% August 557,803 52,157 623,612 11.80% September 619,290 61,486 704,331 13.73% October 692,914 73,625 741,922 7.07% November 784,298 91,383 839,768 7.07% December 972,641 188,343 1,041,432 7.07% Finance Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 76,488$ 76,488$ 130,464$ 70.57% February 146,752 70,263 153,899 4.87% aarch 212,713 65,961 209,473 -1.52% April 274,608 61,895 271,170 -1.25% aay 335,512 60,905 332,822 -0.80% June 406,136 70,624 392,246 -3.42% July 470,869 64,733 452,362 -3.93% August 528,622 57,753 511,477 -3.24% September 592,790 64,168 574,577 -3.07% October 665,109 72,319 642,314 -3.43% November 735,415 70,306 710,211 -3.43% December 808,429 73,014 780,722 -3.43% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-Information Services 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-Finance Packet Page 157 of 433 Packet Page 158 of 433 Packet Page 159 of 433 City Attorney Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 46,492$ 46,492$ 32,000$ -31.17% February 92,983 46,492 91,366 -1.74% aarch 139,475 46,492 123,381 -11.54% April 185,967 46,492 186,128 0.09% aay 232,458 46,492 231,890 -0.24% June 278,950 46,492 279,764 0.29% July 325,442 46,492 325,422 -0.01% August 371,933 46,492 330,595 -11.11% September 418,425 46,492 421,910 0.83% October 464,916 46,492 453,910 -2.37% November 511,408 46,492 499,301 -2.37% December 557,900 46,492 544,692 -2.37% Police Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 704,723$ 704,723$ 681,573$ -3.29% February 1,416,401 711,678 1,369,842 -3.29% aarch 2,138,252 721,851 2,062,997 -3.52% April 2,843,861 705,610 2,754,778 -3.13% aay 3,532,734 688,873 3,458,116 -2.11% June 4,283,279 750,544 4,215,558 -1.58% July 5,002,199 718,920 4,897,465 -2.09% August 5,720,518 718,319 5,599,938 -2.11% September 6,474,000 753,482 6,303,649 -2.63% October 7,187,001 713,001 7,019,012 -2.34% November 8,158,607 971,606 7,967,908 -2.34% December 8,948,664 790,057 8,739,498 -2.34% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-City Attorney 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-tolice Packet Page 160 of 433 Packet Page 161 of 433 Packet Page 162 of 433 Development Services Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 182,478$ 182,478$ 126,887$ -30.46% February 364,463 181,986 257,352 -29.39% aarch 569,107 204,643 387,354 -31.94% April 747,348 178,241 523,426 -29.96% aay 923,916 176,568 678,695 -26.54% June 1,094,697 170,781 826,994 -24.45% July 1,273,462 178,765 997,833 -21.64% August 1,462,616 189,154 1,193,410 -18.41% September 1,646,105 183,489 1,347,782 -18.12% October 1,844,010 197,905 1,505,679 -18.35% November 2,028,039 184,029 1,655,943 -18.35% December 2,219,366 191,327 1,812,166 -18.35% Parks & Recre ation Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 244,774$ 244,774$ 237,608$ -2.93% February 514,038 269,264 486,587 -5.34% aarch 801,588 287,550 732,519 -8.62% April 1,080,098 278,510 977,642 -9.49% aay 1,372,430 292,332 1,271,826 -7.33% June 1,717,333 344,903 1,534,299 -10.66% July 2,157,762 440,430 1,921,487 -10.95% August 2,594,645 436,883 2,368,651 -8.71% September 2,924,625 329,980 2,688,571 -8.07% October 3,213,467 288,842 2,931,567 -8.77% November 3,478,070 264,603 3,172,958 -8.77% December 3,826,916 348,846 3,491,202 -8.77% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-Development Services 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-tarks & Recreation Packet Page 163 of 433 Packet Page 164 of 433 Packet Page 165 of 433 Public Works Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 29,205$ 29,205$ 27,811$ -4.77% February 57,374 28,169 55,607 -3.08% aarch 85,998 28,624 84,738 -1.47% April 113,676 27,678 114,745 0.94% aay 142,297 28,621 142,879 0.41% June 171,373 29,077 171,032 -0.20% July 210,538 39,164 199,315 -5.33% August 238,755 28,217 227,438 -4.74% September 266,891 28,136 256,321 -3.96% October 296,178 29,287 284,363 -3.99% November 322,670 26,492 309,798 -3.99% December 354,098 31,428 339,973 -3.99% Facilities Maintenance Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 109,761$ 109,761$ 118,162$ 7.65% February 228,319 118,558 229,255 0.41% aarch 356,501 128,182 363,708 2.02% April 468,975 112,475 481,545 2.68% aay 583,345 114,370 588,147 0.82% June 696,280 112,934 696,472 0.03% July 809,237 112,957 825,520 2.01% August 918,038 108,802 940,041 2.40% September 1,038,936 120,897 1,060,716 2.10% October 1,145,093 106,158 1,172,625 2.40% November 1,265,760 120,666 1,296,192 2.40% December 1,405,827 140,067 1,439,627 2.40% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-tublic Works 2014 City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-Facilities aaintenance Packet Page 166 of 433 Packet Page 167 of 433 Packet Page 168 of 433 Engineering Cumulative aonthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January 145,346$ 145,346$ 122,149$ -15.96% February 292,949 147,603 246,682 -15.79% aarch 437,616 144,667 376,122 -14.05% April 582,646 145,030 505,140 -13.30% aay 725,109 142,463 649,144 -10.48% June 866,319 141,210 793,532 -8.40% July 1,007,948 141,630 926,107 -8.12% August 1,150,544 142,595 1,060,795 -7.80% September 1,298,303 147,759 1,202,684 -7.36% October 1,452,811 154,508 1,349,933 -7.08% November 1,596,130 143,319 1,483,103 -7.08% December 1,734,579 138,449 1,611,748 -7.08% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. City of Edmonds, WA aonthly Expenditure Report-Engineering 2014 Packet Page 169 of 433 Packet Page 170 of 433 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY (a) Term Purchase Purchase Maturity Yield to Weighted Agency / Issuer Investment Type (months)Date Price Date Maturity Average Washington State Local Government Investment Pool Investment Pool Various 21,305,657$ Various 0.099% 0.047% Snohomish County Investment Pool Investment Pool Various 15,055,263$ Various 0.71% 0.242% FHLMC Bonds 60 12/28/2012 1,000,000 12/28/2017 0.90% 0.020% FHLMC Bonds 54 12/27/2012 1,000,000 6/27/2017 0.75% 0.017% FFCB Bonds 45 12/19/2012 1,000,000 9/19/2016 0.54% 0.012% FNMA Bonds 60 9/19/2014 1,000,000 9/19/2019 1.92% 0.043% FFCB Bonds 60 9/23/2014 1,000,000 9/23/2019 2.03% 0.046% FHLMC Bonds 51 9/26/2014 1,000,000 12/26/2018 1.76% 0.040% FHLMC Bonds 42 9/19/2014 1,000,000 3/26/2018 1.41% 0.032% FICO Bonds 33 9/19/2014 1,027,000 6/6/2017 0.96% 0.022% TOTAL 44,387,920$ 0.52%0.522% Investment Mix % of Total State Investment Pool 48.0%Current 6-month treasury rate 0.05% Bonds 18.1%Current State Pool rate 0.099% Snohomish County Investment Pool 33.9%Blended Edmonds rate 0.52% 100.0% (a) To maturity. Rate Comparison City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Summary As of October 31, 2014 Packet Page 171 of 433 GENERAL FUND OVERVIEW 12/31/2013 9/30/2014 10/31/2014 Q3 YTD 001-General Fund 6,834,380$ 5,711,368$ 6,748,262$ (1,036,893)$ (86,118)$ 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 440,744 519,824 500,233 19,591 59,489 011-Risk Management Fund 387,195 387,877 387,967 (90) 772 012-Contingency Reserve Fund 5,376,796 5,392,709 5,393,968 (1,259) 17,172 013-Mulitmodal Transportation FD 55,859 55,957 55,970 (13) 111 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 1,062 1,065 1,065 (0) 3 016-Building Maintenance 64,762 178,124 185,962 (7,837) 121,200 Total General Fund 13,160,798$ 12,246,925$ 13,273,426$ (1,026,501)$ 112,628$ GENERAL FUND FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- $13.16 $12.25 $13.27 - 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Oct 2014 Mi l l i o n s General Fund *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. Packet Page 172 of 433 This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW 12/31/2013 9/30/2014 10/31/2014 Q3 YTD General Fund 13,160,798$ 12,246,925$ 13,273,426$ (1,026,501)$ 112,628$ Special Revenue 5,373,323 6,763,486 7,128,365 (364,878)$ 1,755,041 Debt Service 57,161 86,304 86,304 -$ 29,142 Total Governmental Funds 18,591,283$ 19,096,715$ 20,488,095$ (1,391,379)$ 1,896,812$ CHANGE IN FUND BALANCESGOVERNMENTAL FUNDS FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- Packet Page 173 of 433 $13.16 $12.25 $13.27 $5.37 $6.76 $7.13 $0.06 $0.09 $0.09 - 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Oct 2014 Mi l l i o n s General Fund Special Revenue Debt Service Governmenta l Fund Ba la nces -By Fund GroupGovernmentalFund Ba la nces -By Fund Group $18.59 $19.10 $20.49 - 6 12 18 24 Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Oct 2014 Mi l l i o n s Governmenta l Fund Balances -Combined *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. Packet Page 174 of 433 This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. Packet Page 175 of 433 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW 12/31/2013 9/30/2014 10/31/2014 Q3 YTD 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund 91,432$ 78,906$ 68,439$ 10,467$ (22,993)$ 111 - Street Fund 215,200 380,056 363,056 17,000$ 147,856 112 - Combined Street Const/Improve 481,154 121,221 384,623 (263,402)$ (96,531) 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 431,932 434,671 420,941 13,731$ (10,991) 118 - Memorial Street Tree 17,703 17,751 17,755 (4)$ 53 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 106,735 122,099 130,434 (8,335)$ 23,698 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 61,719 73,489 73,581 (92)$ 11,862 122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 13,858 12,509 12,413 96$ (1,445) 123 - Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 70,429 80,747 83,354 (2,607)$ 12,925 125 - Real Estate Tax 2 1,101,453 1,732,803 1,793,450 (60,647)$ 691,997 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 760,453 1,467,586 1,530,984 (63,398)$ 770,531 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 225,677 247,999 248,106 (107)$ 22,429 129 - Special Projects Fund 15,289 46,428 46,437 (9)$ 31,148 130 - Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement 70,203 93,951 98,614 (4,663)$ 28,411 132 - Parks Construction Fund 718,446 845,649 846,464 (815)$ 128,018 136 - Parks Trust Fund 150,334 150,821 150,856 (35)$ 522 137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 839,292 855,651 857,710 (2,058)$ 18,418 138 - Sister City Commission 2,014 1,149 1,149 (0)$ (865) Total Special Revenue 5,373,323$ 6,763,486$ 7,128,365$ (364,878)$ 1,755,041$ GOVERNMENTAL Special Revenue FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- $5.37 $6.76 $7.13 - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Oct-14 Mi l l i o n s Special Revenue Special Revenue Funds Packet Page 176 of 433 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. Packet Page 177 of 433 ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW 12/31/2013 9/30/2014 10/31/2014 Q3 YTD 421 - Water Utility Fund 15,244,015$ 16,104,314$ 15,510,354$ 593,961$ 266,339$ 422 - Storm Utility Fund 9,184,099 9,923,669 9,238,310 685,359 54,211 423 - Sewer/WWTP Utility Fund 43,359,087 43,364,105 42,827,550 536,555 (531,537) 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 787,224 787,225 787,225 (0) 1 411 - Combined Utility Operation - 217,029 238,758 (21,729) 238,758 Total Enterprise Funds 68,574,425$ 70,396,342$ 68,602,197$ 1,794,145$ 27,772$ ENTERPRISE FUNDS FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- $238,758 $15,510,354 $9,238,310 $42,827,550 $787,225 $- $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 Combined Utility Water Utility Storm Utility Sewer/WWTP Utility Bond Reserve Enterprise Fund Balances as of Oct ober 31, 2014 Packet Page 178 of 433 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycle SUMMARY OVERVIEW 12/31/2013 9/30/2014 10/31/2014 Q3 YTD Governmental Funds 18,591,283$ 19,096,715$ 20,488,095$ (1,391,379)$ 1,896,812$ Enterprise Funds 68,574,425 70,396,342 68,602,197 1,794,145 27,772 Internal Services Fund 6,847,165 7,224,359 7,329,715 (105,355) 482,550 Agency Funds 247,179 281,876 285,111 (3,235) 37,933 Total City-wide Total 94,260,051$ 96,999,293$ 96,705,117$ 294,175$ 2,445,066$ CITY-WIDE FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL ---- Packet Page 179 of 433 $89,256 $195,855 $7,329,715 $47,968 $38,443 $1,149 $857,710 $150,856 $846,464 $98,614 $46,437 $248,106 $1,530,984 $1,793,450 $83,354 $12,413 $73,581 $130,434 $17,755 $420,941 $384,623 $363,056 $68,439 $13,273,426 $1 $20,000,000 Business Improvement District Firemen's Pension Fund Equipment Rental Fund 2012 LTGO Debt Service Fund $(108) L.I.D. Guaranty Fund L.I.D. Fund Control Sister City Commission Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund Parks Trust Fund Parks Construction Fund Cemetery Maintenance/Improvement Special Projects Fund Gifts Catalog Fund Real Estate Excise Tax 1, Parks Acq Real Estate Excise Tax 2 Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts Youth Scholarship Fund Employee Parking Permit Fund Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund Memorial Street Fund Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund Combined Street Const/Improve Fund Street Fund Drug Enforcement Fund General Fund Governmental Fund Balances as of October 31, 2014 *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW Packet Page 180 of 433 12/31/2013 9/30/2014 10/31/2014 Q3 YTD 511 - Equipment Rental Fund 6,847,165$ 7,110,620$ 7,329,715$ 2,827$ 482,550$ Total Internal Service Funds 6,847,165$ 7,110,620$ 7,329,715$ 2,827$ 482,550$ INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS FUND BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ---- ACTUAL -------- ACTUAL ---- $6.85 $7.11 $7.33 - 2 4 6 8 Dec 2013 Sept 2014 Oct 2014 Mi l l i o n s 511 - Equipment Rental Fund Internal Service Fund Ba la nces *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. Packet Page 181 of 433 AM-7309 7. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:10 Minutes Submitted For:Bertrand Hauss Submitted By:Megan Luttrell Department:Engineering Type: Information Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement with David Evans & Associates for the 76 th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements project Recommendation Forward the item to the consent agenda for approval at the December 2, 2014 City Council meeting. Previous Council Action On September 13, 2011, City Council authorized the Mayor to advertise for Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to complete the design and right-of-way acquisition phases for the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvement project. On August 21, 2012, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #2 with David Evans & Associates for the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvement project. On September 17, 2013, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #4 with David Evans & Associates for the 76th Ave. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvement project Narrative 76th Ave W at 212th St SW is one of the busiest signalized intersections in the City and is served by two federally classified minor arterial streets. The intersection experiences long queues during peak commute and school hours due to the limited capacity of the intersection. Both approaches of 76th Ave W have two shared lanes with no dedicated left turn lane. The left turn volumes are very high, and are timed independently by split phasing signal timing. The proposed improvement will provide dedicated left turn lanes on 76th Avenue and concurrent turning movements during the protected left turn phase. This project will increase the capacity and improve intersection signal operation, traffic flow, vehicle delay, and air quality by reducing vehicle emissions. Various utility upgrades and overhead utility conversion are being incorporated in the project. Bike lanes will also be added on all approaches as part of this project, extending approximately 300’ from the intersection. The supplement adds the following design tasks: • Conceptual Design Plans at the Edmonds Woodway High School: due to the proximity of the drop-off school entrance from 76th Ave W (less than 200’), the queue frequently extends onto 76th Ave W. The additional services will analyze this problem and evaluate drop-off and pick-up circulation at the high school and recommend modifications to address the problem. The City has Packet Page 182 of 433 had preliminary discussions with the School District to reconfigure the striping within the parking lot and have traffic enter from 216th and exit from the existing driveway on 76th Ave. • Underground utility conversion: Snohomish County PUD, Frontier, Comcast, Blackrock Cable, and Washington State Department of Transportation have overhead utilities crossing the intersection. PSE gas lines may also need to be relocated. This task will prepare the plans, specifications and cost estimates to convert the overhead utilities to underground. • Geotechnical investigation in the vicinity of the proposed sanitary sewer system; and • Geotechnical investigation in the vicinity of the proposed storm drainage system. The design fee for Supplement #5 is $69,444 and will be funded by City Funds (Fund 112, Fund 422, and Fund 423) and the CMAQ grant. The stormwater and sewer improvements incorporated into this supplement are funded by the respective utility funds (Fund 422 and 423). The design and ROW phases are scheduled to be completed in 2015. A federal construction grant is anticipated to be awarded by December 2014, in the amount of $3,020,000 (with 13.5% local match from Fund 112). Construction is scheduled for spring 2016. Utility Funds 421, 422, and 423 will contribute to the cost of the project. Attachments David Evans & Associates - Supplemental Agreement Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering (Originator)Robert English 11/20/2014 03:20 PM Public Works Phil Williams 11/20/2014 04:30 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 11/21/2014 08:00 AM Mayor Dave Earling 11/21/2014 09:05 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/21/2014 09:09 AM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 11/19/2014 12:14 PM Final Approval Date: 11/21/2014 Packet Page 183 of 433 P a c k e t P a g e 1 8 4 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 1 8 5 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 1 8 6 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 1 8 7 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 1 8 8 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 1 8 9 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 1 9 0 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 1 9 1 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 1 9 2 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 1 9 3 o f 4 3 3 AM-7299 8. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:10 Minutes Submitted For:Al Compaan Submitted By:Don Anderson Department:Police Department Type: Forward to Consent Information Subject Title Interlocal Agreement for Jail Services with the City of Lynnwood Recommendation Staff recommends forward for consent at the December 2, 2014 business meeting. Previous Council Action NA Narrative The current Interlocal Agreement for Jail Services with the City of Lynnwood is set to expire on December 31, 2014. The new contract is attached and has been approved to form by the Edmonds City Attorney. This contract replaces the original agreement signed in 1994 and not only includes a fee change but also updated contract language. The term for this new contract will be December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015 (agreement shall be automatically renewed annually for one year terms until terminated as provided under the agreement or amended via a written and bilaterally executed amendment). The 2015 rate change related to this new contract is an increase in the daily bed/housing rate from $65.00 per day to $85.00 per day. The current booking fee of $10.00 has not changed. It should be noted that this is the first fee increase for jail services by the City of Lynnwood in 14 years. No other changes to this Interlocal Agreement have a fiscal impact. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year:2015 Revenue: Expenditure: Fiscal Impact: This fee increase was anticipated and $650,000 is built into the Mayor's 2015 budget in Non-Departmental, Prisoner Care Intergovernmental. The budgeted amount is in consideration of the increased fees for jail services. Attachments Lynnwood Jail Contract 2015 Packet Page 194 of 433 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 11/17/2014 11:55 AM Mayor Dave Earling 11/18/2014 09:23 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/18/2014 09:26 AM Form Started By: Don Anderson Started On: 11/17/2014 11:31 AM Final Approval Date: 11/18/2014 Packet Page 195 of 433 CITY OF LYNNWOOD Contract Title: INMATE HOUSING INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT Contract Number: 2522 THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR INMATE HOUSING (hereinafter “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the City of Lynnwood, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington (“Lynnwood”), and the City of Edmonds, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington (hereinafter the “City,” and together with Lynnwood, the “Parties” or individually “Party”). This Agreement is made in accordance with Sections 39.34.080 and 39.34.180 and Chapter 70.48 of the Revised Code of Washington (“RCW”) for the purpose of establishing the terms and conditions pursuant to which the City will transfer custody of certain Inmates to Lynnwood to be housed at Lynnwood’s Detention Facility. In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions, and promises contained herein, the Parties hereto mutually agree as follows: 1. Purpose and Term. The purpose and intent of this Agreement is to establish the terms under which Lynnwood will house certain Inmates of the City for the period January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. This Agreement shall be automatically renewed annually for one year terms until terminated as provided under this Agreement, or amended through a written and bilaterally executed amendment. 2. Definitions. Business Day – Monday through Friday excluding Lynnwood observed holidays. Committing Court – The court that issued the order or sentence that established the City’s custody of a City Inmate. Credit for Time Served – Credit authorized by the sentencing court against the number of days to be served in confinement. Detainer – A legal order authorizing or commanding another Party a right to take custody of a person. City Inmate – A person subject to City custody who is transferred to Lynnwood’s custody under this Agreement. Good Time – Time earned by Inmates for good behavior while in custody. Good Time will be awarded at the conclusion of an Inmate’s sentence and will comply with restrictions imposed by RCW 9.92.151. Inmate – Persons transferred to Lynnwood’s custody to be housed at the Lynnwood Detention Facility. Lynnwood Detention Facility – The detention facility operated by Lynnwood located at 19321 44th Ave. W., Lynnwood, WA 98036. 3. General Provisions. Lynnwood shall accept and incarcerate City Inmates according to the terms of this Agreement and shall provide housing, care, and custody of those City Inmates pursuant to Lynnwood policies and procedures and in the same manner as it provides housing, care and custody to other Inmates. Lynnwood shall manage, maintain, and operate the Lynnwood Detention Facility in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. 4. Right to Refuse or Return City Inmate. To the greatest extent permitted by law, Lynnwood shall have the right to refuse to accept a City Inmate or to return a City Inmate to the City if the City Inmate has a current illness or injury that is listed in Attachment A – Medical Acceptability, or in the reasonable judgment of Lynnwood presents a substantial risk of escape, or of injury to self or Packet Page 196 of 433 other persons or property, or of adversely affecting or significantly disrupting the operations of the Lynnwood Detention Facility. Lynnwood shall provide notice to the City at least one (1) business day prior to transport if a City Inmate is being returned to the City if feasible. Lynnwood retains the right, in its sole discrection, of refusing or to return an inmate to the City. 5. Inmate Transport and Delivery. The City shall be responsible and provide for the transportation and delivery of City Inmates to the Lynnwood Facility and for court appearances, including costs associated therewith. At the time of delivery, the City shall provide a court commitment order to Lynnwood. Said order shall specify the release date for the Inmate. 6. Inmate Medical Records. Should a City Inmate receive medical care for injuries or illness at the time of arrest, and prior to booking at the Lynnwood Detention Facility, the City shall provide copies of medical records documenting such medical care to Lynnwood at the time of booking if the City has access to such records. Lynnwood may require these records to determine if City Inmates meet conditions identified in Attachment A – Medical Acceptability. If the City cannot provide such records, Lynnwood, in its sole discretion, may refuse to accept a City Inmate. 7. Inmate Property. Lynnwood shall accept City Inmate property in accordance with Attachment B – Property, and shall be responsible only for City Inmate property actually delivered into Lynnwood’s possession. Lynnwood shall hold and handle each City Inmate’s personal property pursuant to Lynnwood policies and procedures and in the same manner it holds and handles property of other Inmates. In the event a City Inmate is being transported from a City designated detention or correction facility, it will be the responsibility of the City to process the City Inmate’s property not delivered and accepted into Lynnwood’s possession. 8. Booking. City Inmates shall be booked pursuant to Lynnwood’s booking policies and procedures. Pursuant to RCW 70.48.130, and as part of the booking procedure, Lynnwood shall obtain general information concerning the City Inmate’s ability to pay for medical care, including insurance or other medical benefits or resources to which a City Inmate is entitled. The information is to be used for third party billing. 9. Classification. City Inmates shall be classified pursuant to Lynnwood’s classification policies and procedures, and within the sole discretion and judgment of Lynnwood. The City shall provide information regarding each City Inmate as specified in Attachment C – Classification. 10. Housing. City Inmates shall be assigned to housing pursuant to Lynnwood’s policies and procedures, and within the sole discretion and judgment of Lynnwood. 11. Inmate Work Programs. Lynnwood may assign City Inmates to work programs such as inside and outside work crews, kitchen and facility duties, and other appropriate duties pursuant to Lynnwood’s policies and procedures and within the sole discretion and judgment of Lynnwood. 12. Health Care. City Inmates shall be responsible for co-payment for health services. The City shall be responsible in the event the Inmate cannot pay these costs. No City Inmate shall be denied necessary health care because of an inability to pay for health services. Lynnwood shall notify the City’s designee(s) via electronic means, including e-mail or fax, at the notice address identified in this Agreement if a City Inmate requires medical, mental health, dental, or other medical services at an outside medical or health care facility. The City shall promptly notify Lynnwood of any changes in its designee(s). Lynnwood shall notify the City within a reasonable time period before the City Inmate receives medical, mental health, dental or any other medical services outside of the Lynnwood Facility. The City acknowledges that such notice may not be reasonably possible prior to emergency care. The City shall pay for all medical, mental health, all prescription medications, dental or any other medical services that are required to care for City Inmates outside of the Lynnwood Detention Facility. Lack of prior notice shall not excuse the City from financial responsibility for related medical expenses, and shall not be a basis for imposing financial responsibility for related medical expenses on Lynnwood. Lynnwood shall bear the expense of any such medical care necessitated by improper conduct of Lynnwood, or of its officers or agents. Packet Page 197 of 433 If a City Inmate is admitted to a hospital, the City shall be responsible for hospital security unless other arrangements are made with Lynnwood. Lynnwood may provide hospital security services for an additional charge if staff is available, at Lynnwood’s sole discretion. Outside medical expenses for City Inmates housed on behalf of more than one (1) jurisdiction shall be the sole responsibility of the City, which will be solely responsible to recoup these expenses from other jurisdictions. The City shall be responsible for transportation of an Inmate to non-emergency medical appointments outside of the Lynnwood Detention Facility. 13. Inmate Discipline. Lynnwood shall discipline City Inmates according to Lynnwood policies and procedures and in the same manner which other Inmates are disciplined; provided, however, nothing contained herein shall be construed to authorize the imposition of a type of discipline that would not be imposed on a comparable Inmate, up to and including the removal of earned early release credits as approved by the City. 14. Removal from the Lynnwood Detention Facility. Except for work programs or health care, and during emergencies, City Inmates shall not be removed from the Lynnwood Detention Facility without written authorization from the City or by the order of a court of competent jurisdiction. Other jurisdictions may “borrow” a City Inmate only according to the provisions of Attachment D – Borrowing. In the event of the City Inmate’s emergency removal, Lynnwood shall notify the City by electronic means, including e-mail or fax, as soon as reasonably possible. No early release or alternative to incarceration, home detention, or work release shall be granted to any Inmate without written authorization by the committing court. 15. Visitation. Lynnwood shall provide reasonable scheduled visitation for attorneys, spouses, family and friends of City Inmates, in accordance with Lynnwood policies and procedures. 16. Inmate-Attorney Communication. Confidential telephones or visitation rooms shall be available to City Inmates to communicate with their legal counsel. The City shall provide to Lynnwood any known telephone numbers Inmates should use to reach legal counsel. 17. Detainers. Inmates in a “Detainer” status shall be handled according to Attachment E – Warrants/Other Court Orders/Detainers. 18. Releases. Inmates shall be released from the Lynnwood Detention Facility in accordance with court orders. Lynnwood shall not transfer custody of a City Inmate housed pursuant to this Agreement to any Party other than the City, except as provided in this Agreement or as directed by the City. 19. Jail Sentence Calculations. Lynnwood shall award Good Time credits for Inmates in custody in accordance with state law and any policies adopted by Lynnwood. The City is responsible to notify Lynnwood of any credit days awarded for time served by use of court commitment forms. 20. Escape. If a City Inmate escapes Lynnwood’s custody, Lynnwood shall notify the City as soon as reasonably possible. Lynnwood shall use all reasonable efforts to pursue and regain custody of escaped City Inmates. 21. Death. If a City Inmate dies while in Lynnwood custody, Lynnwood shall notify the City as soon as reasonably possible. The Snohomish County Medical Examiner shall assume custody of the City Inmate’s body. Unless another Party becomes responsible for investigation, Lynnwood shall investigate and shall provide the City with a report of its investigation. The City may participate in the investigation. If another Party becomes responsible for investigation, Lynnwood shall serve as a liaison or otherwise facilitate the City’s communication with and receipt of reports from the other Party. The City shall provide Lynnwood with written instructions regarding the disposition of the City Inmate’s body. The City shall pay for all reasonable expenses for the preparation and shipment of the body. The City may request in writing that Lynnwood arrange for burial and all matters related or incidental thereto and the City shall be responsible for all costs associated with this request. Packet Page 198 of 433 22. City’s Right of Inspection. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable advance notice, to inspect the Lynnwood Detention Facility at reasonable times. During such inspections, the City may interview City Inmates and review City Inmates’ records. The City shall have no right to interview Inmates housed for other jurisdictions or to review their records, unless City is properly authorized to do so by the Inmate or the other jurisdiction. 23. Bed Rate. In consideration of Lynnwood’s commitment to house City Inmates, the City shall pay Lynnwood based upon the rates and other applicable fees or charges stated in this Agreement. Bed Rate per Day (or portion thereof): $85.00 Booking Fee: $10.00 All contract rates are established to recover full cost of services and may be adjusted by Lynnwood on a yearly basis. In the event rates are to be changed, amendments to this contract will be sent to the City no less than 180 days prior to December 31st of each year or otherwise as the Parties agree. Any revised fees shall be attached to this Agreement as an addendum. Nothing in this Section, or revision to fees, shall affect the right of either Party to terminate this Agreement according to Section 30. 24. Billing and Payment. Lynnwood shall provide the City with monthly statements itemizing the name of each City Inmate, the number of days of housing, including the date and time booked into the Lynnwood Detention Facility and date and time released from Lynnwood and itemization of any additional charges including a description of the service provided, date provided and reason for service. Lynnwood shall provide said statement for each month on or about the 15th day of the following month. Payment shall be due to Lynnwood within 30 days from the date of the bill. Lynnwood may bill the City electronically. The Daily Rate for City Inmates housed on charges from multiple agencies will be divided equally among those agencies. 25. Billing and Dispute Resolution. Withholding of any amount billed or alleging that any Party is in violation of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a dispute, which shall first attempt to be resolved as follows, and as a mandatory predicate to termination as provided in Section 30(C): A. For billing disputes, the City must provide written notice of dispute to Lynnwood within 60 days of the disputed billing stating the reason that the charges are disputed. Lynnwood shall respond in writing to such disputes within 60 days of receipt of such notice of dispute. B. For both billing and other types of disputes, Lynnwood and the City shall attempt to resolve the dispute by negotiation between staff members of each Party. If such negotiation is unsuccessful, and the dispute involves billing issues, Lynnwood shall notify the City that the billing remains due, and give notice that if the City does not make payment within 30 days that Lynnwood may opt to cease accepting Inmates from the City. If the dispute involves another type of issue, or is not resolved through staff negotiations, the Parties agree to at least one (1) meeting between their executive leadership to attempt to reach an administrative remedy. The Parties agree that all administrative efforts will be exhausted prior to pursing other contractual, legal, equitable or alternative dispute resolutions. 26. Duration of Agreement. The duration of this Agreement shall be as stated in Section 1 unless otherwise terminated in accordance with Section 30 of this Agreement. 27. Independent Contractor. In providing services under this Agreement, Lynnwood is an independent contractor and neither it nor its officers, nor its agents nor its employees shall be deemed employees of the City for any purpose, including responsibility for any federal or state tax, industrial insurance, or Social Security liability. The provision of services under this Agreement Packet Page 199 of 433 shall not give rise to any claim of career service or civil service rights, which may accrue to an employee of the City under any applicable law, rule or regulation. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create an interest in or give a benefit to third persons not signing as a Party to this Agreement. 28. Hold Harmless, Defense, and Indemnification. Lynnwood shall hold harmless, defend, and indemnify the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all suits, actions, claims, liability, damages, judgments, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) (also including but not limited to claims related to false arrest or detention, alleged mistreatment, alleged violation of civil rights, injury, or death of any City Inmate, or loss or damage to City Inmate property while in Lynnwood custody) that result from or arise out of the acts or omissions of Lynnwood, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents in connection with or incidental to the performance or non-performance of Lynnwood’s services, duties, and obligations under this Agreement. The City shall hold harmless, defend, and indemnify Lynnwood, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all suits, actions, claims, liability, damages, judgments, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorney’s fees) (also including but not limited to claims related to false arrest or detention, alleged mistreatment, alleged violation of civil rights, injury, or death of any City Inmate, or loss or damage to City Inmate property while in Lynnwood custody) that result from or arise out of the acts or omissions of the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents in connection with or incidental to the performance or non-performance of the City’s services, duties, and obligations under this Agreement. In the event the acts or omissions of the officials, officers, agents, and/or employees of both the City and Lynnwood in connection with or incidental to the performance or non-performance of the City’s and or Lynnwood’s services, duties, and obligations under this Agreement are the subject of any liability claims by a third party, the City and Lynnwood shall each be liable for its proportionate concurrent negligence in any resulting suits, actions, claims, liability, damages, judgments, costs and expenses and for their own attorney’s fees. Nothing contained in this section or this Agreement shall be construed to create a right in any third party to indemnification or defense. Lynnwood and the City hereby waive, as to each other only, their immunity from suit under industrial insurance, Title 51 RCW. This waiver of immunity was mutually negotiated by the Parties hereto. The provisions of this section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement. 29. Insurance. Lynnwood and the City shall provide each other with evidence of insurance coverage, in the form of a certificate or other competent evidence from an insurance provider, insurance pool, or of self-insurance sufficient to satisfy the obligations set forth in this Agreement. Lynnwood and the City shall each maintain throughout the term of this Agreement, Commercial General Liability coverage with limits not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate; Employer’s Liability with limits not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per employee and two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate; Police Professional or Law Enforcement Liability with limits not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate: Errors & Omissions Liability with limits not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate; and Automobile Liability insurance with limits not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) each accident. Any coverage provided on a Claims Made basis must include a Retroactive Date that is on or prior to the effective date of this contract. Any coverage provided on a Claims Made basis must be maintained at least three (3) years after termination of the contract. Packet Page 200 of 433 30. Termination. A. Mutual Agreement: This Agreement may be terminated by mutual written consent between Lynnwood and the City with 90 days written notice to the other party and to the State Office of Financial Management as required by RCW 70.48.090 stating the grounds for said termination and specifying plans for accommodating the affected City Inmates. B. Imperiling Conditions: The City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement where: 1) conditions and/or circumstances at the Lynnwood Detention Facility present an imminent risk of serious injury or death to the City’s Inmates (“Imperiling Conditions”); 2) the City has sent Lynnwood written notice by electronic means, including e-mail or fax, as soon as reasonably possible describing with reasonable specificity the Imperiling Conditions; and 3) Lynnwood has failed to cure the Imperiling Conditions within a reasonable period of time, which, unless the Parties agree in writing to a longer period, shall be no more than 45 days after Lynnwood receives the City’s notice. Termination pursuant to this section 30(B) shall be effective if and when: 1) after at least 45 days, Lynnwood has not cured the Imperiling Condition(s); and 2) the City has removed its Inmates; and 3) the City has given Lynnwood formal written notice of final termination pursuant to this Section 30(B). C. Material Breach: Subject to compliance with Section 25 above, either Party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement if: 1) the other Party is in material breach of any term of this Agreement; 2) the terminating Party has sent the breaching Party written notice of its intent to terminate this Agreement under this section by certified mail, return receipt requested describing with reasonable specificity the basis for the termination; and 3) the breaching Party has failed to cure the breach within 90 days, unless the Parties agree in writing to a longer cure period. D. By Either Party. This Agreement may be terminated by written notice from either Party to the other Party delivered by regular mail to the contact person identified herein, provided that termination shall become effective 90 days after receipt of such notice. Within said 90 days, the City agrees to remove its Inmate(s) from the Lynnwood Detention Facility. 31. Equal Opportunity. Neither Party shall discriminate against any person on the grounds of race, creed, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, sexual orientation, veterans and military status, political affiliation or belief or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap in violation of any applicable federal law, Washington State Law Against Discrimination (chapter 49.60 RCW) or the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC 12110 et seq.). In the event of the violation of this provision, the other Party may terminate this Agreement as provided in Sections 25 and 30 above. 32. Assignment. This Agreement, or any interest herein, or claim hereunder, shall not be assigned or transferred in whole or in part by either Party to any other person or entity without the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. In the event that such prior written consent to an assignment is granted, then the assignee shall assume all duties, obligations, and liabilities of the Party stated herein. 33. Non-Waiver. The failure of either Party to insist upon strict performance of any provision of this Agreement or to exercise any right based upon a breach thereof or the acceptance of any performance during such breach shall not constitute a waiver of any right under this Agreement. 34. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is changed per mutual Agreement or any portion is held invalid by a court, the remainder of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 35. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Any actions, suit, judicial or administrative proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement shall be brought and tried in the Superior Court for the State of Washington in Snohomish County. 36. Approval and Filing. Each Party shall approve this Agreement by resolution, ordinance or otherwise pursuant to the laws of the governing body of each Party. The signatures of the Packet Page 201 of 433 authorized signatory(ies) and Lynnwood below shall constitute a presumption that such approval was properly obtained. A copy of this Agreement shall be filed pursuant to RCW 39.34.040. 37. General Provisions. Unless otherwise agreed in writing and executed by both Parties, and so long as this Agreement remains in effect, this document constitutes the entire Agreement between the City and Lynnwood under which Lynnwood houses City Inmates, and no other oral or written agreements between the Parties shall affect this Agreement. No changes or additions to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon either Party unless such change or addition be in writing and executed by both Parties. Any provision of this Agreement that is declared invalid or illegal shall in no way affect or invalidate any other provision. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts. 38. Notices. Unless stated otherwise herein, all notices and demands shall be in writing and sent or hand-delivered to the Parties to their addresses as follows: TO CITY: City of Edmonds Attn: Chief Al Compann 250 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 TO CITY OF LYNNWOOD: City of Lynnwood Purchasing and Contracts Division P.O. Box 5008 Lynnwood, WA 98046-5008 Phone: (425) 670-5000 AND City of Lynnwood Attn: Detention Commander P.O. Box 5008 Lynnwood, WA 98046-5008 Alternatively, to such other addresses as the Parties may hereafter designate in writing. Notices and/or demands shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, or hand-delivered. Such notices shall be deemed effective when mailed or hand-delivered at the addresses specified above. Packet Page 202 of 433 SIGNATURE BLOCKS City of Edmonds By:____________________________________ Printed:________________________________ Title:__________________________________ Date:__________________________________ City of Lynnwood: By:___________________________________ Printed: Nicola Smith Title: Mayor Date:__________________________________ ____________________________ By:___________________________________ Printed:________________________________ Title:__________________________________ Date:__________________________________ Approved as to Form: By:__________________________________ Printed: Rosemary Larson Title: Lynnwood City Attorney Date:_________________________________ ________________________ By:____________________________________ Printed:________________________________ Title:__________________________________ Date:__________________________________ Attest: By:_________________________________ Printed:_____________________________ Title:_______________________________ Date:________________________________ Packet Page 203 of 433 ATTACHMENT A MEDICAL ACCEPTABILITY Lynnwood shall determine the medical and mental acceptability of Inmates for booking or housing using the following guidelines. Lynnwood retains the right to not accept an Inmate in its sole discretion. Excluding criteria include but are not limited to: 1. Signs of untreated broken bones or dislocated joints. 2. Any injury or illness requiring emergency medical treatment. 3. Unconsciousness. 4. Inmates unable to stand and walk under their own power, unless they normally use an assistive device, such as a wheelchair, for mobility. 5. Bed bound individuals. 6. Individuals with attached IV or requiring IV medications. 7. Individuals requiring the use of oxygen tanks. 8. AMA (Against Medical Advice) from the hospital. 9. Individuals having had major invasive surgery within the last 72 hours. Non-invasive surgery such as oral surgery, laser-eye surgery and minor surgery may be evaluated on a case by case basis. 10. Wounds with drainage tubes attached. 11. Persons with Alzheimer’s, dementia or other psychological conditions to the point where the Inmate cannot perform activities of daily living (“ADL’s”) or who do not have the capacity to function safely within a correctional environment. 12. Persons who are diagnosed as developmentally delayed and who do not have the capacity to function safely within a correctional environment or who cannot perform ADL’s. 13. Persons undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment. 14. Persons undergoing dialysis. 15. Persons with suicidal ideations or gestures within the past 72 hours. 16. Persons, if prescribed and regularly using, who have not taken psychotropic medications for at least 72 hours. 17. Persons who have by self-disclosure, admitted to attempting suicide within the last 30 days. 18. Persons who have attempted suicide during their current incarceration. 19. Persons displaying current psychotic episode. Packet Page 204 of 433 ATTACHEMENT B PROPERTY Lynnwood retains the right to refuse to accept Inmate property in its sole discretion. The following list of guidelines is an example only, will be amended from time to time, and be in force as implemented for Lynnwood Jail management without the requirement for amending this contract. Lynnwood will endeavor to notify a City of significant changes that may impact the services outlined in this agreement. Lynnwood may accept Inmate property as follows: 1. The property must be able to fit in a single property bag no larger than a common paper grocery bag. 2. Money, valuables, checks and documents, and medications shall be placed in a clear envelope within the Inmate’s property bag. 3. Lynnwood will not accept the following: a) Backpacks, suitcases, etc. b) Unpackaged food products or perishable food products. c) Any type of weapon (includes pocket knives). d) Liquids. e) Helmets of any kind. f) Any items that will not fit into the property bag. g) Material deemed to be contraband. h) Marijuana or associated drug paraphernalia. Lynnwood will limit property returned with the Inmate to the City according to these criteria. Packet Page 205 of 433 ATTACHMENT C CLASSIFICATION The City shall supply Lynnwood with the following Classification related information, if known to or in possession of the City: 1. If the City Inmate has been classified to a special housing unit and/or if the City Inmate has been classified as protective custody. 2. If the City Inmate is a violent offender or has displayed violent behavior during present or past incarcerations. 3. If the City Inmate is an escape risk. Packet Page 206 of 433 ATTACHMENT D BORROWING One Party may “borrow” another Party’s Inmate as follows: 1. If a Party requests the transport of another Party’s Inmate from Lynnwood the requesting Party must notify each Party with rights to custody of the Inmate, and if each Party with rights to custody of the Inmate notifies Lynnwood in writing (e-mail) of its approval, Lynnwood shall provide the requested transport to the requesting Party. Lynnwood will complete a custody transfer form that lists all outstanding detainers. The custody transfer paperwork will accompany the Inmate. 2. Once custody of the Inmate has been transferred to the requesting Party, it is the responsibility of the requesting Party to determine whether the Inmate shall be returned to the custody of Lynnwood, and if so, the requesting Party shall make all necessary and proper arrangements with Lynnwood and any Party with rights to custody of the Inmate, for the Inmate’s return according to the terms of this Agreement. The requesting Party, to the full extent permitted by law, defends, indemnify, save and hold harmless Lynnwood as provided in Section 28 of the Agreement. 3. Lynnwood will not track the Inmate once he or she has left Lynnwood’s facility. 4. If the Inmate is returned to the custody of Lynnwood, the requesting Party shall provide Lynnwood with sentencing/charge information. The requesting Party shall supply all pre- sentence and post-sentence paperwork from agreeing Party’s that authorized the borrowing of the Inmate. This will aid Lynnwood in determining split billing and release dates. Packet Page 207 of 433 ATTACHMENT E WARRANTS/OTHER COURT ORDERS/DETAINERS The following shall apply to City Inmates who are subject to warrants from other jurisdictions or to other court orders for confinement or detainers: 1. When receiving a City Inmate, the Booking Officers shall review all paperwork provided by the City for all grounds to hold the Inmate. 2. Prior to releasing a City Inmate, Lynnwood shall check the NCIC and WACIC systems to determine if the Inmate is subject to any valid warrants or other detainers. a) If the City Inmate is subject to a confirmed warrant from another Washington jurisdiction, Lynnwood will process the Inmate for transfer on the Cooperative Transport Chain. Packet Page 208 of 433 AM-7313 9. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:20 Minutes Submitted For:Rob English Submitted By:Robert English Department:Engineering Type: Information Information Subject Title Presentation of the Train Trench Concept by Tetra Tech Recommendation None. This item is being presented for information only. Previous Council Action Narrative Rick Schaefer from the consulting firm of Tetra Tech will make a presentation on the conceptual cost estimate prepared for the train trench in Edmonds. Attachments Draft Presentation Tetra Tech Train Trench Memo Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering (Originator)Robert English 11/20/2014 04:19 PM Public Works Phil Williams 11/20/2014 04:30 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 11/21/2014 08:00 AM Mayor Dave Earling 11/21/2014 09:06 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/21/2014 09:10 AM Form Started By: Robert English Started On: 11/20/2014 03:22 PM Final Approval Date: 11/21/2014 Packet Page 209 of 433 Edmonds City Council November 25, 2014 Packet Page 210 of 433 Purpose and Scope Identify required footprint and envelope of the Train Trench concept Develop technically feasible approach to construct the Train Trench Identify associated design, permitting and implementation requirements Prepare estimate of direct construction costs and the costs to implement Packet Page 211 of 433 Tetra Tech Design Team Local experts practicing large-scale civil/structural engineering globally •Below-grade train structures •Train trench •Massive water- and earth-retaining structures •State, National and Global award-winning projects Packet Page 212 of 433 Tetra Tech Project Experience Pioneer Square Station University Street Station Packet Page 213 of 433 Tetra Tech Project Experience Panama Canal Third Set of Locks Design-Build Packet Page 214 of 433 Tetra Tech Project Experience INHC Lake Borgne Surge Barrier Packet Page 215 of 433 Construction Concept Packet Page 216 of 433 Extent of the Train Trench •Depth to clear roadway bridges •Slope to climb back to grade •7,750 feet long •3,700 feet of trench into groundwater •Steep slopes near Pt. Edwards and Sunset Avenue •Shorelines Packet Page 217 of 433 Depth of the Train Trench PROPOSED WILLOW CREEK CROSSING Packet Page 218 of 433 Construction Conditions Drive Costs •Maintaining and supporting active rail line •Shallow groundwater/saturated soils •Urban setting/confined work space •Proximity to shorelines and steep slopes •Extension of Willow Creek Project •Environmental review/permitting Packet Page 219 of 433 Cost Estimate Summary Direct Construction $136 M Contingency, 30% - 50%$41M -$68M Sales Tax, 9.5%$17M - $19M Construction Subtotal $194M -$223M Management Reserve, 10%$19M -$22M Project Mgmt. & Administration, 3% $6M - $7M Engineering, 12%$23M - $27M Environmental Mitigation $4M Environmental Review & Permitting $5M Project Total $251M - $288M Packet Page 220 of 433 Packet Page 221 of 433 Tetra Tech, Inc. 1420 5 th Avenue, Suite 550 Seattle, WA 98101 Tel 206.728.9655 Fax 206.728.9670 www.tetratech.com October 31, 2014 Mr. Phil Williams, Director of Public Works City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Avenue N Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject:Order-of-Magnitude Estimate of Cost to Relocate BNSF Tracks Below Grade The Edmonds waterfront is separated from downtown Edmonds by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) tracks, with two roadways connecting the city across the tracks: Main Street and Dayton Street. These streets provide the sole vehicular and pedestrian access to Edmonds’ waterfront. When trains move through or make stops in Edmonds, access to the waterfront including emergency access is severed, affecting residents, businesses, the Port of Edmonds, and Washington State Ferries’ terminal operations. Gate closures at the Main and Dayton Street crossings are increasing in frequency and duration with growing train traffic. Significant ongoing growth in the number and length of trains has been forecast since 2005. These forecasts were developed in advance of the recent expansion of coal and oil shipments which will further extend gate closures beyond the durations cited above. The extended gate closure times, and blocked vehicular and pedestrian access to the waterfront present multiple issues for the City of Edmonds and its residents: Denial of public safety services (police, fire, EMS) to the waterfront Delays in vehicle loading and unloading at Washington State Ferries’ terminal Interruption of Community Transit bus service Denial of access to and from residences, commercial and industrial businesses, and services Denial of access to and from four City shoreline parks, the Port of Edmonds marina, the underwater dive park, the Senior Center, residences, and businesses. In addition to the extended gate closures, other expressed concerns of Edmonds residents regarding the increased rail traffic include: Transport of hazardous materials through the city Increased risks to residents and the shoreline environment from accidents and spills Increased frequency of safety horns sounding, particularly at night Impacts of the above concerns on property values, economic development potential, and the peace and tranquility for which Edmonds is known. The City of Edmonds is considering approaches to improve access across the BNSF tracks to waterfront businesses, residences, the Port and the ferry terminal. One proposed concept would reconstruct the railroad tracks in a depressed grade to eliminate the train-vehicle conflicts at Main Street and at Dayton Street. This concept is referred to herein as the “Train Trench” concept. Packet Page 222 of 433 2 In order to determine how the Train Trench concept should be appropriately considered with other potential approaches to address issues of reduced waterfront access, a preliminary estimate of the potential cost of such a construction project is needed. The City retained Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) to develop an initial approach and sequence to construct the Train Trench concept, and to prepare an order-of-magnitude estimate of the cost to plan, design, permit, and construct the project. This memorandum presents the outcomes of Tetra Tech’s cost estimating efforts that included: Compiling existing, available data provided by the City on conditions along the project corridor encompassing: property ownerships and rights-of-way, soil conditions, City GIS data, major City utilities, railroad design/construction drawings, Willow Creek relocation, Sound Transit southbound loading platforms, and other information that may be useful to estimating the scope of constructing the Train Trench. Selecting and developing a single method and sequence to construct the Train Trench concept along the existing railroad alignment. The construction method was developed to a conceptual level only, illustrated by preliminary alignment/profile and selected cross sections generated from topographic data in the City’s GIS. Because there are no opportunities to re-route train traffic, the method was necessarily developed so as to maintain continuous railroad service along the corridor throughout construction. Preparing an order-of-magnitude cost estimate, presented as a range of costs to reflect the conceptual basis of the construction planning. The cost estimate includes elements for planning, engineering and design, permitting, environmental review documentation, and construction phases. The estimate is accompanied by documentation of general assumptions appropriate to the conceptual level of design development. This memorandum summarizes the analysis and presents the order-of-magnitude cost estimate for the City’s consideration. The Train Trench Concept The Train Trench concept would excavate a trench along the current railroad right-of-way to install the tracks below grade to create a grade separation from the surface streets at Main and Dayton. The concept is illustrated below in rendered images posted on a website by an Edmonds resident. Source: www.edmondstraintrench.net Packet Page 223 of 433 3 The depth of the trench is driven by the required vertical clearance for the trains, specified by the BNSF’s design standards, the rail bed and rails below the trains, plus the height of the roadway bridges at Dayton and Main streets. At its maximum depth, extending between Main Street and Dayton Street, this depth has been assumed to total 30 feet measured from existing grade to the interior bottom of the trench structure. As the trench extends to the north from Main Street and to the south from Dayton Street, the trench would gradually grow shallower. The slope at which the tracks may climb is typically 1.0%, but can be increased to 1.5%(18 inches every 100 feet), under some circumstances. The transition to the maximum slope is along a vertical curve, and the maximum rate of curvature is dictated under railroad design standards as a function of the design speed of the tracks. In developing the concept design, Tetra Tech has taken an aggressive approach to the geometric design in an effort to minimize the length of the trench and, thereby, the project footprint, cost and the extent of potential grading conflicts. The resulting length of the train trench project would be 7800 feet, or approximately 1.5 miles. The extent of the train trench is shown in a plan view of the alignment in Figure 1, and in profile in Figure 2. A series of cross sections of the trench structure at locations along the alignment is depicted in Figure 3. The interior width of the trench must accommodate two sets of tracks plus required lateral clearances for an estimated total interior width of 36 feet. Currently there is a single track through the downtown area, and the rail bed was recently widened to accommodate two tracks in accordance with BNSF’s agreements with Sound Transit to provide capacity for commuter rail service along BNSF’s tracks. Alignment Features Affecting Construction There are a number of features that complicate the construction of this Train Trench that would need to be resolved during the design and permitting of the project, and which affect the cost of construction. This discussion is limited to features of the project that directly influence the design and means of constructing the project that substantially affect its projected cost. Proximity to the shoreline. The north and south ends of the Train Trench would be constructed in close proximity to the shoreline. Working through the boulders that support the rail bed, containing the underlying soils, keeping the excavation free of heavy inflows of salt water from Puget Sound, and limited working area outside of the track alignment. Other sections of the train trench would be constructed along the edge of the Edmonds Marsh. The proximity to the shoreline also expands the scope of permitting and environmental review to which the project would be subjected. Rigorous protections of these waters will be a requirement of any permitted construction. Proximity to slopes. On the other side of the railroad alignment, portions of the trench must be constructed against steep slopes. At the south terminus of the trench, the project runs Packet Page 224 of 433 4 along the slope below the Point Edwards development. Immediately north of Main Street, the constructed project must support the slope below Sunset Avenue. Urban setting. Where the alignment is not immediately abutting shoreline or slopes, the remaining corridor is bounded by urban uses and improvements. This setting limits the space available for staging construction, determines the need for mitigation measures, and most significantly dictates a constrained footprint and that the trench must employ vertical sides, as there is no room to lay back slopes. It is anticipated that some additional right-of-way may be required to accommodate the project’s construction and operation. Shallow groundwater. The groundwater table is found at shallow depth throughout the alignment, and the deepest portions of the trench must be excavated 20 feet or more below the water table. Dewatering will be required during construction to lower the groundwater table within the excavation. The groundwater table also fluctuates due to tidal influence. The trench structure must be watertight, adding to its cost. Construction of the trench will need to address the buoyant forces exerted on the structure, so the structure must be tied down to solid soils using piling. Soil conditions. Soils along portions of the alignment exhibit poor strength. Extensive piling depth was required to support the bridge structure recently constructed to cross over the Willow Creek relocation channel. Grade conflicts. The interior depth of the train trench where it crosses the new bridge at Willow Creek, near the off-leash park, would be on the order of 6 feet, with the bottom of the structure extending below. The design grades for the Willow Creek (also known as Shellabarger Creek) relocation through the bridge structure conflict with the required grade for the train trench, i.e., the train trench structure would block the proposed channel. The length of the channel relocation would need to be extended further south, and a new bridge crossing would be required to route the channel under the tracks. Active Rail Line. A major influence on the means, duration and cost of constructing the Train Trench is that the work must be performed while maintaining an active rail corridor. The rail line cannot be shut down, as there is no alternative route in Western Washington (refer to Figure 4). The proximity of the construction to an operating rail line slows and interrupts construction activity, limits options for accessing the work, and restricts the staging of the work. In general, this extends the duration of construction and the impacts to surrounding infrastructure and activities, and increases the overall cost of the project. Comparisons to other Projects The foregoing discussion of features along the project alignment presents distinctions from the construction of other depressed-grade railroad projects. Some projects have been cited as comparable to the Edmonds Train Trench concept. The following discusses the degree to which solutions for such projects were found to be applicable to the project in Edmonds. Packet Page 225 of 433 5 Reno, NV No active rail line – trains were rerouted to a separate shoofly alignment to allow unimpeded construction activity along the alignment. Constructing a shoofly on a separate alignment is not feasible through downtown Edmonds; hence, a third active line must be maintained in the rail corridor, which affects both the rate of construction and railroad operations. Soil conditions allowed for sloping the sides of the trench or the use of soil nailing to retain steeper slopes. These methods are precluded by the saturated ground conditions existing along the Edmonds alignment. Constructing below water table – the Reno construction extended a few feet below the water table, requiring short cutoff walls to control the migration of water into the structure, and pumping to convey the limited water out of the structure. In Edmonds, the excavation will extend to over 20 feet below the groundwater table, requiring a much more robust means of sealing the trench from groundwater and supporting the saturated soils along the walls of the excavation. Port of Vancouver, WA No active rail line – this project constructed a new rail alignment. Partially constructed below grade to about one-half the maximum depth of the Edmonds project, with the remaining train clearance achieved above grade Water levels extend to only a limited distance above the trench bottom, and the water levels are only periodically elevated to these levels during extreme flood events Alameda, CA No active rail line Not proximate to water or shorelines Construction Sequence The construction the trench is based on maintaining one rail line operational at all time with flagging to maintain public and contractor safety. The trench is constructed with up to five-foot diameter secant pile wall construction methods. Construction staging is assumed to be available on-site. The drilling will be performed on a rail-mounted platform on the non-active line and the work will sequenced progressively from one end of the alignment. The wall is constructed with alternating lean concrete short piles and longer reinforced concrete structural piles. The lean concrete short piles act as lagging for the longer structural piles. There is 6 inches of overlap between the piles to increase the water resistance and seismic integrity of the wall. The construction will begin with drilling the lean concrete shafts at nine-foot centers. The structural shafts are then drilled through the lean concrete shafts. There is a concrete cap beam along the top of the piles to create structural continuity and distribute any localized loads from soil instability or seismic loads. The soil between the completed secant pile walls is excavated and the spoils removed on a rail-mounted platform in a container. A base slab is provided, supported by precast concrete beams which span between the secant pile walls. The slab is provided to resist soil heave due to water pressure. The slab will also reduce water intrusion into the trench. A concrete fascia is then provided along the walls’ interior faces using light reinforcement and shotcrete. The concrete fascia provides both architectural value and increased water intrusion resistance. Packet Page 226 of 433 6 Construction Schedule The duration of construction is estimated at three years. The duration of the work directly affects the cost of the project. The limited working space also restricts the ability of a contractor to simultaneously install the secant piles at multiple locations. Estimated Costs A cost estimate is provided in an attachment to this memorandum. The attachment provides the construction cost basis for the major elements of the work and for anticipated construction to restore affected infrastructure and surrounding improvements. In addition, the Estimate Summary presents other costs associated with the project’s construction: Design Contingency. Until the design of the project is complete, there are myriad unknown conditions which cannot be specifically accounted for in the construction cost estimate. At a planning level of project development, a 30% design contingency is commonly applied; however, since no design has been initiated for this project, little is known about the conditions that may be encountered, and the owner of the railroad has not been consulted on the design provisions for the Train Trench concept, a design contingency of 50% is warranted. Management Reserve. A management reserve is applied to the estimate to allow for potential change orders that can arise during the construction of the project. Project Management & Administration. These are cost incurred by the City to manage the construction contract and coordinate between the contractor, stakeholders, permitting agencies, and the railroad owner. Engineering. The anticipated cost of developing the design of the project, geotechnical investigations, engineering, preparation of construction documents, and bidding the construction contract. Environmental Mitigation. The project will necessarily protect the area and receiving environments from impacts of the construction and operation of the project. These costs would be determined through the course of environmental review and permitting for the project. In addition to the amount identified for environmental mitigation, a line item has been included in the base construction cost estimate to modify and extend the current design for the relocation of Willow Creek. Environmental Review and Permitting. The project scope and configuration would be more fully defined through the environmental review process, with the development and evaluation of alternatives for their respective impacts and the necessary mitigation. Project commitments and obligations would be further detailed in the permit conditions for constructing the project. Packet Page 227 of 433 7 FIGURES Packet Page 228 of 433 Packet Page 229 of 433 Packet Page 230 of 433 Packet Page 231 of 433 8 Figure 4. Rail System across Washington State Packet Page 232 of 433 9 COST ESTIMATE Packet Page 233 of 433 P a c k e t P a g e 2 3 4 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 2 3 5 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 2 3 6 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 2 3 7 o f 4 3 3 AM-7301 10. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:10 Minutes Submitted By:Carrie Hite Department:Parks and Recreation Type: Forward to Consent Information Subject Title Deputy Director Parks job description and salary range approval Recommendation Council review job description and salary range for Parks Deputy Director and forward to Council business meeting for approval on the consent agenda. Previous Council Action Council approved a decision package last year to add special duty pay for the current Recreation Manager to acknowledge she was working in the capacity as an interim Assistant Director. Narrative Since the Parks Director was assigned to be the Reporting Director for Human Resources, the Recreation Manager has been working above and beyond the job description to assist with larger Parks projects. Some examples of this include managing our donation program, writing grants for park development, assisting with staffing the Park Levy exploratory committee, assisting with the completion of the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan. The Council approved a decision package last year to acknowledge this and compensate the Recreation Manager accordingly by adding special duty pay. In April of 2014, the Mayor continued to assign the Parks Director as the HR Reporting Director. The Recreation Manager has still been assisting the Parks Director with larger departmental projects. This request is for the Council to approve a Parks Deputy Director job description and the salary range. The intent is for the Recreation Manager to be promoted into this position. Once this position is established, and as the Parks department experiences a few retirements this next year, it is likely the Parks Director will request additional latitude to reorganize in order to operate the department more efficiently. Anticipating several retirements, the ultimate goal is to create a solid succession plan so services will continue to be high quality and uninterrupted. The Mayor’s proposed budget includes a 5% increase for the Recreation Manager for special duty. This reorganization will place the Recreation Manager at a step on the Deputy Director scale that will be a 5% increase. Because of this compensation policy, this will not have an impact on the 2015 budget, but will have an impact on future budgets as the Deputy Director moves through the salary range. Attachments Deputy Director job description Packet Page 238 of 433 Salary survey and range Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 11/18/2014 10:16 AM Mayor Dave Earling 11/18/2014 10:59 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/18/2014 02:01 PM Form Started By: Carrie Hite Started On: 11/18/2014 10:04 AM Final Approval Date: 11/18/2014 Packet Page 239 of 433 City of EDMONDS Washington DEPUTY PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DIRECTOR Department: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Pay Grade: NR-16 Bargaining Unit: Non-Represented FLSA Status: Exempt Revised Date: November 2014 Reports To: Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director POSITION PURPOSE: Under the direction of the Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director, provide leadership, manage, supervise and administer a comprehensive Recreation program, including oversight of community center, outdoor pool, sports and fitness, camps, outdoor education and business services. Assist the Director with park development and planning, including strategic and long range planning for the department, and capital project management. Develop and manage assigned budgets, and revenue and prepare and administer department grants and grant programs. May act on behalf of or in lieu of the department director at selected management, community, Council or regional meetings dealing with parks, recreation and cultural services activities. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES: The following duties ARE NOT intended to serve as a comprehensive list of all duties performed by all employees in this classification, only a representative summary of the primary duties and responsibilities. Incumbent(s) may not be required to perform all duties listed and may be required to perform additional, position-specific duties. • Manages the employment and hiring process and employee relations for assigned area. Manages, coordinates, and reviews the work of assigned staff, assigns work activities and coordinates schedules, projects, and programs. • Provides constructive feedback; reviews and evaluates work and makes effective suggestions and recommendations. Provides advice and counsel to staff, develops or assists with developmental work plans for staff; makes recommendations and/or implements corrective actions, discipline and termination procedures as appropriate/necessary or as directed. • Supervises, coaches, trains and motivates staff, and coordinates and/or provides staff training. • Assist Director in evaluating existing facilities, identifying deficiencies and assists with the design of new facilities to accomplish park goals and objectives. • Manages, administers, maintains and oversees assigned budgets including making recommendations to the annual budget. Assists in development and updating of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plans; • Monitors expenditures and identifies needs, reviews and approves reports, purchases, and payments according to established policies and practices and makes recommendations and forecasts for future funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials, and supplies. • Advocates and works closely with citizens and other service providers in a cooperative community response to recreation, park use, facilities, programs, and addressing concerns. • Prepares, writes and administers various public and privategrants for park and recreation facility development, proposals, evaluations and acknowledgements. • Provides staff support to the Planning Board, City Council Committees, citizen advisory groups and committees as needed. Prepares and presents staff reports and other necessary correspondence. Packet Page 240 of 433 • Prepares reports and recommendations to the department director and on policy issues relating to departmental operations. • Develops schedules and implements a comprehensive recreation program. • Works collaboratively with other agencies on program development and implementation. • Manages and oversees staff program development and implementation, fee structures for programs and instructors, marketing and media releases. • Identifies and reports vandalism and safety and health hazards; purchases supplies, equipment and materials. • Oversees business services for the department, including the management of the Frances Anderson Center tenant contracts, special event contracts, concessions, fee analysis and development. • Works with the public on gifting opportunities. • Investigates and responds to complaints and questions regarding facilities, programs, instructors and staff. • Receives and approves scholarship applications; discusses accommodations for special needs programming and facility. • Oversees department risk management; meets with various vendors and procures required supplies and equipment. • Assists the Director in the development and implementation of department goals, objectives, work plans and long-range plans; establishes division goals, objectives and priorities and assists with department project presentations. • Provides operational leadership to assure standards are met for productivity, efficiency, continuous quality improvement, customer satisfaction and teamwork. • Performs work within scope of authority and training and in compliance with policies and quality standards while monitoring assigned operations and ensuring compliance with Federal, State and local regulations and policies. • Implements policies and procedures and ensures the consistent application of rules and regulations. • Attends and participates in professional group meetings; maintains awareness of new trends and developments in the fields related to areas of assignment; incorporates new developments as appropriate and assigned. Required Knowledge of: • Operational characteristics, services and activities related to recreational services and programs including business and industry principles and practices related to work assigned. • City and Community Center recreation programs, activities and operations. • Principles, practices and techniques of developing and implementing a comprehensive recreation program. • Knowledge of applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances such as the Growth Management Act, SEPA, Public Meetings Act, public bidding requirements and other. • Knowledge of principles and practices of administration, supervision and training of personnel. • Contract administration, modern construction methods and materials. • Recreational needs of diverse community groups and programs in order to meet these needs. • Up to date marketing principles and practices. • Effective strategies for community fundraising and donations. • Structure, organization and inter-relationships of city departments, agencies and related governmental agencies and offices affecting assigned functions. • Federal, state and local laws, rules, and regulations related to assigned activities and programs. • Effective oral and written communication principles and practices to include public relations and public speaking. • Program/project management techniques and principles. Packet Page 241 of 433 • Grant writing techniques and principles. • Research methods and report preparation and presentation. • Modern office procedures, methods, and equipment including computers and computer applications such as: word processing, spreadsheets, and statistical databases. • English usage, spelling, grammar and punctuation. • Principles of business letter writing. • Principles and practices of governmental budget preparation and administration. • Supervisory and training principles, best management practices, methods and techniques. Required Skill in: • Supervising, leading, coaching and using best management practices to improve staff performance; delegating tasks and workload assignments. • Developing, scheduling and implementing a comprehensive recreation program. • Planning, developing and administering an annual operating budget and assisting with long-range capital improvement programs. • Developing and implementing a variety of recreation programs and services that meet community needs. • Administering contracts for services. • Preparing, submitting, administering and monitoring grant proposals. • Analyzing situations accurately and adopting an effective course of action. • Utilizing personal computer software programs and other relevant software affecting assigned work and in compiling and preparing spreadsheets. • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with staff, management, vendors, outside agencies, community groups and the general public. • Interpreting and administering policies and procedures sufficient to administer, discuss, resolve and explain them. • Applying program/project management techniques and principles. • Preparing and maintaining accurate records and reports. • Planning and preparing various promotional materials. • Developing and monitoring program/project operating budgets, costs and schedules. • Communicating effectively verbally and in writing. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education and Experience: Bachelor’s Degree in Recreation and Leisure Management, Business Administration or related field and seven years of experience in recreation and leisure management, recreation and leisure program development or similar related programs and services, preferably within a municipal or public sector environment, that includes five years of staff supervisory and budgetary responsibility for a major division or program; OR an equivalent combination of education, training and experience. Required Licenses or Certifications: Valid State of Washington Driver’s License. Must be able to successfully complete and pass background check. WORKING CONDITIONS: Environment: Packet Page 242 of 433 • Primarily an office environment. • Constant interruptions. • Driving a vehicle to conduct work. Physical Abilities: • Hearing, speaking or otherwise communicating to exchange information in person or on the phone. • Reading and understanding a variety of materials. • Seeing to read materials, close vision, distance vision, color vision, peripheral vision, depth perception, and the ability to adjust focus. • Operating a computer keyboard or other office equipment. • Sitting, standing or otherwise remaining in a stationary position for extended periods of time. • Bending at the waist, kneeling, crouching, reaching above shoulders and horizontally or otherwise positioning oneself to accomplish tasks. • Lifting/carrying or otherwise moving or transporting up to 40 lbs. Hazards: • Contact with angry and/or dissatisfied customers. Incumbent Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ________________________ Department Head: _______________________________________ Date: ________________________ Packet Page 243 of 433 Low High 1 EDMONDS Assistant Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director 2 BOTHELL NO MATCH 3 BREMERTON NO MATCH 4 BURIEN NO MATCH 5 DES MOINES NO MATCH 6 ISSAQUAH Deputy Parks Director 7,952 10,149 7 KIRKLAND Deputy Parks & Community Services Director 7,354 9,253 8 LACEY NO MATCH 9 LYNNWOOD Deputy Parks, Recreation & Cultural Arts Director 7,063 8,939 10 OLYMPIA NO MATCH 11 PUYALLUP NO MATCH 12 SAMMAMISH Depuuty Parks Director 7,872 10,774 13 UNIVERSITY PLACE NO MATCH Ranked by Median 1 Sammamish 10,774 2 Issaquah 10,149 3 Edmonds 9,701 9,701 4 Kirkland 9,253 5 Lynnwood 8,939 $116,412 Low High Recommended salary range: NR 16 $86,905 $116,462 DEPUTY PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL SERVICES DIRECTOR City Name Position Title Wage Range Packet Page 244 of 433 AM-7308 11. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:30 Minutes Submitted For:Rob English Submitted By:Megan Luttrell Department:Engineering Review Committee: Committee Action: Approve for Consent Agenda Type: Information Information Subject Title Discussion on the Proposed 2015-2020 Capital Facilities Plan/Capital Improvement Program. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and an ordinance be prepared to adopt the 2015-2020 Capital Facilities Plan as amended by the City Council. Previous Council Action On September 23, 2014, Council reviewed the process to approve the Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. On October 28, 2014, Council reviewed the proposed Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. On November 3, 2014, a public hearing was held to receive public comment. On November 10, 2014, the City Council rescheduled the item to the November 18th City Council meeting. On November 18, 2014, the City Council discussed the item and scheduled it for further discussion at the November 25, 2014 study session. Narrative The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is a document updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP contains a list of projects that need to be expanded or will be new capital facilities in order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not included in the CFP. These preservation projects are identified within the six-year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan projects which encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects. CIP vs. CFP The CFP and CIP are not the same thing; they arise from different purposes and are in response to Packet Page 245 of 433 different needs. While the CIP is a budgeting tool that includes capital and maintenance projects, tying those projects to the various City funds and revenues, the CFP is intended to identify longer term capital needs (not maintenance) and be tied to City levels of service standards. The CFP is also required to be consistent with the other elements (transportation, parks, etc) of the Comprehensive Plan, and there are restrictions as to how often a CFP can be amended. There are no such restrictions tied to the CIP. The proposed 2015-2020 CFP is attached as Exhibit 1. The CFP has three project sections comprised of General, Transportation and Stormwater. The proposed 2015-2020 CIP is attached as Exhibit 2. The CIP has two sections related to general and parks projects and each project list is organized by the City's financial fund numbers. Exhibit 3 is a comparison that shows added, deleted and changed projects between last year's CFP/CIP to the proposed CFP/CIP. The CFP and CIP were presented and a public hearing was held at the Planning Board meeting on September 24, 2014. The Planning Board recommended the CFP and CIP be forwarded to the City Council for approval. The draft minutes from the Planning Board meeting are attached as Exhibit 4. Attached is the Sunset Walkway cost information for the trial project and project design costs to date. The City has received $78,527 in reimbursement for design costs from the federal grant through the second quarter of 2014. The PSRC TAP preliminary cost estimate for the $2,099,000 figure in the proposed CIP/CFP in 2018 is also attached for reference. The difference between the cost estimate and the number in the CIP/CFP is an estimate of inflation from the date of estimate to the assumed date of construction (2018). The TAP estimate did not include costs for design and construction of water and sewer utilities that may be built, if the project goes forward. Attached are answers in response to questions raised by Councilmembers and a resolution approved by the Economic Development Commission supporting the addition of a project to the CFP for public restrooms in the downtown area. Revisions have been made to Fund 116 on pages 11 and 12 of the CIP document. Attachments Exhibit 1 - Draft CFP 2015-2020 Exhibit 2 - Draft CIP 2015-2020 Exhibit 3 - CFP/CIP Comparison (2014 to 2015) Exhibit 4 - Draft Planning Board Minutes Sunset Walkway Trial Project Costs Sunset Walkway Design Costs PSRC TAP Estimate EDC Resolution of Support for Downtown Restroom Project Councilmember Questions & Answers Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering Megan Luttrell 11/20/2014 04:32 PM Public Works Scott Passey 11/21/2014 10:26 AM City Clerk Scott Passey 11/21/2014 10:26 AM Mayor Dave Earling 11/21/2014 10:41 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/21/2014 10:43 AM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 11/19/2014 12:13 PM Packet Page 246 of 433 Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 11/19/2014 12:13 PM Final Approval Date: 11/21/2014 Packet Page 247 of 433 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2015-2020 DRAFT Packet Page 248 of 433 CFP GENERAL Packet Page 249 of 433 Packet Page 250 of 433 $0 Public Vote Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds $0 $0 Total $5-$23 M $0 Community Unknown Conceptual $0 Partnerships $0 REET $0 Total $5 M $0 Capital Campaign Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds $0 $0 Total $5 M $0 Public Vote RCO Land Acquisitio Conceptual $2,100,000 REET 1 / Grants $1,000,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $4,000,000 G.O. Bonds $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $6,100,000 Total $3,000,000 $100,000 $3,000,000 Unknown $0 Library / Unknown Conceptual $0 City G.O. Bonds $0 $0 Total Unknown $0 Capital Campaign Unknown Conceptual $1,330,000 REET 2 $0 $40,000 $440,000 $400,000 $450,000 $1,000,000 School District $500,000 $500,000 $5,800,000 Foundation $2,500,000 $1,750,000 $1,550,000 $2,750,000 Grants $750,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $10,880,000 Total $3,750,000 $40,000 $3,690,000 $400,000 $3,000,000 10-12M $0 Public Vote Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds $0 $0 Total $3 - $4M $0 Public Vote / Grants Unknown Conceptual $0 G.O. Bonds $0 Private Partnership $0 Total $1 - 2M EIS $0 Federal (Unsecured) US DOT Completed $0 State Funds $0 Total Unknown Unknown Conceptual $0 Grants $0 Total Unknown Conceptual $0 Grants $0 Total $0 $300,000 Total CFP $16,980,000 Annual CFP Totals $6,750,000 $140,000 $6,690,000 $400,000 $3,000,000 $0 Downtown Public Restroom Locate, construct, and maintain a public restroom downtown. Parks & Facilities Maintenance & Operations Building Edmonds / Sno-Isle Library Expand building for additional programs (Sno-Isle Capital Facilities Plan). Public Market (Downtown Waterfront)Acquire and develop property for a year round public market. Community Park / Athletic Complex - Old Woodway High School In cooperation with ESD#15 develop a community park and athletic complex. Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry / Mutimodal Facility Relocate ferry terminal to Marina Beach. Replace / Renovate deteriorating building in City Park. Senior Center Grounds Replace and expand deteriorating building on the waterfront. Edmonds School District (City has lease until 2021). Replace / Renovate (Currently subleased on Civic Playfield until 2021). Boys & Girls Club Building Civic Playfield Acquisition and/or development 2021-20252020201920182017 Art Center / Art Museum 20162015Revenue Source (2015-2020) Total Cost Current Project Phase Grant Opportunity PurposeProject Name Aquatic Facility Meet citizen needs for an Aquatics Center (Feasibility study complete August 2009). Establish a new center for the Art's Community. P a c k e t P a g e 2 5 1 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 2 5 2 o f 4 3 3 PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Facility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 – $23,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the current pool. SCHEDULE: 2014-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $5m - $23m * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 253 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Art Center / Art Museum ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A new Art Center/Museum facility will provide and promote Cultural / Arts facilities for the City of Edmonds. The need for visual and performing arts facilities is a high priority stated in the adopted updated Community Cultural Arts Plan 2001 and in the 2008 update process. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The City of Edmonds desires to secure and provide for public Cultural Arts facilities in the community. The emphasis on the arts as a high priority creates the need to determine feasibility for and potentially construct new visual arts related facilities. SCHEDULE: 2014-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $5,000,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 254 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Boys & Girls Club Building ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Build new Boys & Girls Club facility to accommodate the growing and changing needs of this important club. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The current Boys & Girls Club was constructed as a field house by the Edmonds School District decades ago and is in need of major renovation or replacement. It is inadequate in terms of ADA accessibility and does not meet the needs of a modern club. SCHEDULE: 2014-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $5,000,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 255 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Civic Playfield Acquisition and/or Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6.3M 6th Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County 8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquire or work with the School District to develop this 8.1 acre property for continued use as an important community park, sports tourism hub and site of some of Edmonds largest and most popular special events in downtown Edmonds. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Gain tenure and control in perpetuity over this important park site for the citizens of Edmonds. SCHEDULE: 2014-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019-2025 Acquisition $20,000 $3M Planning/Study 100,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction $3M 1% for Art TOTAL $20,000 $3M $100,000 $3M * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 256 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Edmonds/Sno-Isle Library ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Expand building/parking to accommodate additional library needs and programs. Library improvements identified in Sno-Isle Libraries Capital Facility Plan: 2007-2025 PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements will better serve citizens needs requiring additional space and more sophisticated technology. SCHEDULE: 2014-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL Unknown * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 257 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic Complex at the Former Woodway High School ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $11,535,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District, community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and undermaintained facility with great potential as community multi-use active park. Site has existing controlled access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees. SCHEDULE: 2014-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020- 2025 Planning/Study $655000 300,000 40000 150,000 Engineering & Administration 175,000 150,000 175,000 Construction $3,930,000 3,390,000 400,000 2,700,000 1% for Art 125,000 TOTAL $655000 $3,750,000 40000 $3,690,000 $400,000 $3,000,000 $10m - $12m * all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 258 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Parks & Facilities Maintenance & Operations Building ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3-$4 Million PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 40 year old maintenance building in City Park is reaching the end of its useful life and is in need of major renovation or replacement. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment in order to maintain City parks and Capital facilities for the long term. SCHEDULE: Contingent on finding additional sources of revenue from general and real estate taxes. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $3m - $4m * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 259 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Senior Center grounds ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1-2M * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate grounds, parking, beach access and area around Senior Center, in conjunction with the construction of a new Senior Center building. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This facility is at the end of its useful life. The Edmonds Senior Center, a nonprofit, will be launching a capital campaign to reconstruct the Senior Center and seek a long term land lease with the City. It is the City’s intent to rehabilitate the grounds and beach access surrounding the Sr. Ctr when construction begins. SCHEDULE: Work with Sr. Center on timing of construction and grounds rehab. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $1-2M Packet Page 260 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry / Multimodal Facility ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds Crossing is multimodal transportation center that will provide the capacity to respond to growth while providing improved opportunities for connecting various forms of travel including rail, ferry, bus, walking and ridesharing. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide an efficient point of connection between existing and planned transportation modes. SCHEDULE: 2014-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020- 2025 Engineering & Administration Right of Way Construction 1% for Art TOTAL Unknown * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 261 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Public Market (Downtown Waterfront) ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to establish a public market, year around, on the downtown waterfront area. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project will help to create a community gathering area, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a valuable asset to Edmonds. SCHEDULE: This project depends on the ability to secure grant funding, and community partners willing to work with the city to establish this. This potentially can be accomplished by 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL Packet Page 262 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Downtown Restroom ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $300,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to locate, construct and maintain a downtown public restroom. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project satisfies goals in the Strategic Action Plan and the PROS plan. It is being supported by the Economic Development Commission and Planning Board. This will help to provide a much needed downtown amenity, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a valuable asset to Edmonds. SCHEDULE: This project depends on the ability of funds. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL 300,000 Packet Page 263 of 433 Packet Page 264 of 433 CFP TRANSPORTATION Packet Page 265 of 433 Packet Page 266 of 433 Safety / Capacity Analysis $251,046 (Federal or State secured)$251,046 $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Construction $0 (Unsecured) $43,954 (Local Funds)$43,954 $295,000 Total $295,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $1,115,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$100,000 $163,000 $852,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $1,115,000 Total $100,000 $163,000 $852,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $10,000 (Local Funds)$10,000 $10,000 Total $10,000 $3,588,077 (Federal or State secured)$481,447 $3,106,630 $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Possible Grant Design / ROW $0 (Unsecured) $2,134,510 (Local Funds)$230,140 $1,904,370 $5,722,587 Total $711,587 $5,011,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $4,964,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$500,000 $836,000 $3,628,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $4,964,000 Total $500,000 $836,000 $3,628,000 $5,375,000 (Federal or State secured)$3,431,500 $1,943,500 $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Design / ROW $0 (Unsecured) $518,500 (Local Funds)$518,500 $5,893,500 Total $3,950,000 $1,943,500 $0 (Federal or State secured) Possible $10,000,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$500,000 $4,500,000 $5,000,000 State Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) Appropriation $0 (Local Funds) $10,000,000 Total $500,000 $4,500,000 $5,000,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$1,431,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,431,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$10,211,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $10,211,000 Project Name 228th St. SW Corridor Safety Improvements Intersection improvements to decrease intersection delay and improve level of service. Install two-way left turn lanes to improve capacity and install sidewalk along this stretch to increase pedestrian safety (50 / 50 split with Snohomish County; total cost: ~20 Million). Highway 99 Gateway / Revitalization 2016Funding Source Project Phase Realign highly skewed intersection to address safety and improve operations; create new east-west corridor between SR-99 and I-5. 220th St. SW @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements Reconfigure EB lane and add protected/permissive for the NB and SB LT to improve the intersection delay. 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to 238th St. SW) 2021-2025 Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements 212th St SW @ 84th Ave W (5corners) Intersection Improvements 76th Av. W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements Reduce intersection delay by converting 9th Ave. to (2) lanes for both the southbound and northbound movements. SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave W Intersection Improvements Main St. and 9th Ave S (Interim Solution) 2018 2019 2020 Improve safety at the intersection by converting a stop controlled intersection for NB and SB to a signalized intersection. Grant Opportunity (2015-2020) Total CostPurpose 20172015 Intersection improvements to decrease intersection delay and improve level of service (LOS). Installation of a traffic signal to reduce the intersection delay and improve Level of Service (LOS). Install gateway elements and safety improvements along SR-99 Corridor. P a c k e t P a g e 2 6 7 o f 4 3 3 Project Name 2016Funding Source Project Phase 2021-2025201820192020 Grant Opportunity (2015-2020) Total CostPurpose 20172015 $0 (Federal or State secured) $3,722,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$341,000 $686,000 $2,695,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $3,722,000 Total $341,000 $686,000 $2,695,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $5,046,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$484,000 $737,000 $3,825,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $5,046,000 Total $484,000 $737,000 $3,825,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $5,235,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$502,000 $765,000 $3,968,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $5,235,000 Total $502,000 $765,000 $3,968,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$906,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $906,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$1,093,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,093,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$1,093,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,093,000 Widen 212th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200' storage length and an eastbound left turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements. Convert all-way controlled intersection into signalized intersection. Widen 216th St. SW to add a left turn lane for eastbound and westbound lanes. Walnut St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements Convert all-way controlled intersection into signalized intersection. Olympic View Dr. @ 174th St. SW Intersection Improvements Main St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection Improvement Hwy 99 @ 212th St SW Intersection Improvements Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvement Widen 220th St. SW and Hwy 99 to add a westbound right turn lane (for 325' storage length) and a soutbound left turn lane (for 275' storage length). Install traffic signal to improve the Level of Service (LOS) and reduce intersection delay. P a c k e t P a g e 2 6 8 o f 4 3 3 2021-2025201820192020 Grant Opportunity (2015-2020) Total CostPurpose 201720152016Funding Source Project PhaseProject Name $0 (Federal or State secured) $1,520,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$125,000 $125,000 $1,270,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $1,520,000 Total $125,000 $125,000 $1,270,000 $392,109 (Federal or State secured)$392,109 $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Design $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $392,109 Total $392,109 $0 (Federal or State secured) $65,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$65,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $65,000 Total $65,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $65,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$65,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $65,000 Total $65,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $82,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$82,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $82,000 Total $82,000 $8,650 (Federal or State secured)$8,650 Possible $1,816,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$1,816,000 RCO / TIB Grant Design $283,000 (Unsecured)$283,000 $1,350 (Local Funds)$1,350 $2,109,000 Total $10,000 $2,099,000 Provide safe sidewalk along short missing link. Non-motorized Pedestrian / Bicycle Projects 2nd Ave. S from James St. to Main St. Walkway Dayton St. between 7th Ave. S to 8th Ave. S Walkway Provide safe sidewalk along short missing link. Sunset Ave. Walkway from Bell St. to Caspers St. Provide sidewalk on west side of the street, facing waterfront. 236th St SW from Edmonds Way (SR- 104) to Madrona Elementary Improve pedestrian safety along 236th St. SW, creating a safe pedestrian connection between SR- 104 and Madrona Elementary Provide safe and desirable route to Seview Elementary and nearby parks. 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr Walkway and sight distance improvements Maple St. from 7th Ave. S to 8th Ave. S Walkway Provide safe sidewalk along short missing link. P a c k e t P a g e 2 6 9 o f 4 3 3 2021-2025201820192020 Grant Opportunity (2015-2020) Total CostPurpose 201720152016Funding Source Project PhaseProject Name $0 (Federal or State secured) Grant for Design $2,306,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$349,000 $1,957,000 funding currently Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) under review $0 (Local Funds) $2,306,000 Total $349,000 $1,957,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $189,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$189,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $29,000 (Local Funds)$29,000 $218,000 Total $218,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $325,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$325,000 $760,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$0 $0 (Local Funds) $325,000 Total $325,000 $760,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $190,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$190,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $190,000 Total $190,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $380,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$380,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $380,000 Total $380,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $3,900,000 (Federal or State unsecured)$1,000,000 $2,900,000 Possible Grant Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $425,000 (Local Funds)$425,000 $4,325,000 Total $1,425,000 $2,900,000 $519,041 (Federal or State secured)$519,041 $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Design $0 (Unsecured) $1,038,893 (Local Funds)$1,038,893 $1,557,934 Total $1,557,934 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$1,249,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,249,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$189,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $189,000 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W Provide sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W (completing missing link) Meadowdale Beach Rd. Walkway Provide safe sidewalk along missing link. Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW Provide safe sidewalk, connecting to ex. sidewalk along 200th St. SW (Maplewood Elementary School). Walnut St from 3rd Ave. S to 4th Ave. S Walkway Provide short missing link. Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S Walkway Provide short missing link. 189th Pl. SW from 80th Ave. W to 78th Ave. W Walkway Provide short missing link. Olympic Ave from Main St to SR-524 / 196th St. SW Walkway Reconstruct sidewalk (ex. conditions: rolled curb / unsafe conditions) along a stretch with high pedestrian activity and elementary school. 4th Ave. Corridor Enhancement Create more attractive and safer corridor along 4th Ave. 238th St. SW from 100th Ave W to 104th Ave W Walkway and Stormwater Improvements Provide safe walking route between minor arterial and collector. P a c k e t P a g e 2 7 0 o f 4 3 3 2021-2025201820192020 Grant Opportunity (2015-2020) Total CostPurpose 201720152016Funding Source Project PhaseProject Name $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$175,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $175,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured)$1,050,000 $0 (Local Funds) $0 Total $1,050,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $60,000 (Local Funds)$10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $60,000 Total $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $6,000 (Federal or State secured)$6,000 $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Construction $0 (Unsecured) $0 (Local Funds) $6,000 Total $6,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) $0 (Federal or State unsecured) Conceptual $0 (Unsecured) $350,000 (Local Funds)$50,000 $300,000 $350,000 Total $50,000 $300,000 Total CFP $50,749,130 Annual CFP Totals $6,976,630 $7,274,500 $10,000 $6,418,000 $11,942,000 $18,128,000 $18,157,000 Totals Source 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 $10,133,923 Total Federal & State (Secured)$5,083,793 $5,050,130 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,920,000 Total Federal & State (Unsecured)$0 $0 $0 $6,308,000 $12,669,000 $21,943,000 $760,000 $283,000 Unsecured $0 $0 $0 $283,000 $0 $0 $17,397,000 $4,582,207 Local Funds $1,892,837 $2,224,370 $10,000 $435,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 Revenue Summary by Year 84th Ave. W between 188th St. SW and 186th St. SW Walkway Provide safe walking route between those (2) local streets. 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W Walkway Provide safe walking route between principal arterial and minor arterial. Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming To assist residents and City staff in responding to neighborhood traffic issues related to speeding, cut- through traffic and safety. Trackside Warning System or Quiet Zone @ Dayton and Main St. Crossings Install Trackside Warning System and Quiet Zone @ Dayton and Main St. Railroad Crossings in order to reduce noise level within Downtown Edmonds. 15th St SW from Edmonds Way to 8th Ave S Provide safe walking route between minor arterial and collector. P a c k e t P a g e 2 7 1 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 2 7 2 o f 4 3 3 PROJECT NAME: 212th St. SW @ 84th Ave. W (5-Corners) Intersection Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,305,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The intersection of 84th Ave and 212th is 5 legged, which also includes Main Street and Bowdoin Way approaches. The intersection is stop-controlled for all approaches. A roundabout would be constructed. The project also includes various utility upgrades and conversion of overhead utilities to underground. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #6). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The intersection currently functions at LOS F and delays during the PM peak hour will worsen over time. A roundabout will improve the LOS. SCHEDULE: Construction documentation will be completed in 2015. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW Construction $295,000 1% for Art TOTAL $295,000 Packet Page 273 of 433 PROJECT NAME: SR-524 (196th St. SW)/ 88th Ave. W Intersection Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,115,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right-turn-only (prohibiting left-turn and through movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. The ex. LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #8). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St. SW. SCHEDULE: The intersection LOS must meet MUTCD traffic signal warrants and be approved by WSDOT since 196th St. SW is a State Route (SR524). No funding is currently allocated to this project (pending grant funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $100,000 $163,000 Construction $852,000 1% for Art TOTAL $100,000 $163,000 $852,000 Packet Page 274 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Main St and 9th Ave. S (interim solution) ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of a mini-roundabout or re-striping of 9th Ave. with the removal of parking on both sides of the street. (not included in the 2009 Transportation Plan project priority chart) PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The intersection is stop-controlled for all approaches and the existing intersection LOS is E (below the City’s concurrency standards: LOS D). The re- striping of 9th Ave. would improve the intersection delay to LOS C or LOS B with the installation of a mini-roundabout. SCHEDULE: 2016 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $1,000 Construction $9,000 1% for Art TOTAL $10,000 Packet Page 275 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 76th Ave W @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6,191,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add a northbound and southbound left-turn lane to convert the signal operation for those approaches from split phasing to protected-permissive phasing. Add a right- turn lane for the westbound, southbound, and northbound movements. The project also consists of various utility upgrades and conversion of overhead utilities to underground (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #3). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the existing level of service from LOS D (LOS F by 2015) to LOS C. SCHEDULE: Federal grants have been secured for all project phases. Design started in 2012 and is scheduled for completion in Fall 2015. Right-of-way acquisition is anticipated to be completed in Fall 2015. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2016. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $711,587 Construction $5,011,000 1% for Art TOTAL $711,587 $5,011,000 Packet Page 276 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 220th St SW @ 76th Ave W Intersection Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,964,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through / right turn lane. Change eastbound and westbound phases to provide protected-permitted phase for eastbound and westbound left turns. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #11). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The LOS would be improved from LOS E to LOS C. SCHEDULE: Engineering and construction scheduled between 2018 and 2020 (unsecured funding). * All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $500,000 $836,000 Construction $3,628,000 1% for Art TOTAL $500,000 $836,000 $3,628,000 Packet Page 277 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 228th St. SW Corridor Safety Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $7,300,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1) Extend 228th St across the unopened right-of-way to 76th Avenue West 2) Signalize the intersection of 228th St SW @ SR99 and 228th St. SW @ 76th Ave. West 3) Construct a raised median in the vicinity of 76th Avenue West. 4) Add illumination between 224th St SW and 228th St SW on SR 99 5) Overlay of 228th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to ~ 2,000’ east of 76th Ave. W. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #1). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project will improve access / safety to the I-5 / Mountlake Terrace Park & Ride from SR99. This east / west connection will reduce demand and congestion along two east- west corridors (220th Street SW and SR104). Roadway safety will also be improved as SR 99/ 228th Street SW will become a signalized intersection. 228th St. SW is being overlaid from 80th Pl. W to ~ 1,000 LF east of 72nd Ave. W. as well as 76th Ave. W from 228th St. SW to Hwy. 99. The project consists of various utility upgrades. SCHEDULE: Construction scheduled to begin in 2015 and be completed in 2016. Federal and State grants were secured for the construction phase. This project is combined into one construction contract with the Hwy. 99 (Phase 3) Lighting project. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering, Administration, and ROW Construction $3,950,400 $1,943,500 1% for Art TOTAL $3,950,400 $1,943,500 * All or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts Packet Page 278 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Highway 99 Gateway / Revitalization ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project would include, among other features, wider replacement sidewalks or new sidewalk where none exist today, new street lighting, center medians for access control and turning movements, etc., attractive and safe crosswalks, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, as well as landscaping and other softscape treatments to warm-up this harsh corridor and identify the area as being in Edmonds. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve aesthetics, safety, user experience, and access management along this corridor. In addition, economic development would be improved. SCHEDULE: The design phase is scheduled for 2018. The construction phase is scheduled for 2019 and 2020 (unsecured funding for all phases). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $500,000 Construction $4,500,000 $5,000,000 1% for Art TOTAL $500,000 4,500,000 $5,000,000 Packet Page 279 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,431,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #9). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. By 2015, the Level of Service will be F, which is below the City’s concurrency standards (LOS D). The improvement would modify the Level of Service to LOS B. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2021 and 2026 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $286,000 Construction $1,145,000 1% for Art TOTAL $1,431,000 Packet Page 280 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to 238th St. SW) ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $20,422,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project was ranked #11 in the Long Walkway list of the 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve overall safety of the transportation system along this collector street: 1) the sidewalk and bike lanes would provide pedestrians and cyclists with their own facilities and 2) vehicles making left turn will have their own lane, not causing any back-up to the through lane when insufficient gaps are provided. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2021 and 2026 (unsecured funding). The project cost is split between Snohomish County and Edmonds since half the project is in Esperance. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $2,042,000 Construction $8,169,000 1% for Art TOTAL $10,211,000 Packet Page 281 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW intersection improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,722,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 216th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for and an eastbound left turn lane. Provide protected-permissive left turn phases for eastbound and westbound movements. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2018 and 2020. (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & ROW & Administration $341,000 $686,000 Construction $2,695,000 1% for Art TOTAL $341,000 $686,000 $2,695,000 Packet Page 282 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW intersection improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,046,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 220th St. SW to add Westbound right turn lane for 325’ storage length. Widen SR-99 to add 2nd Southbound left turn lane for 275’ storage length. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #10). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve existing intersection delay from 72 seconds (w/o improvement) to 62 seconds (w/ improvement) in 2025. SCHEDULE: All Phases are scheduled between 2018 and 2020 (unsecured funding for all phases). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW $484,000 $737,000 Construction $3,825,000 1% for Art TOTAL $484,000 $737,000 $3,825,000 Packet Page 283 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Hwy. 99 @ 212th St. SW intersection improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,235,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen 212th St. SW to add a westbound left turn lane for 200’ storage length and an eastbound left turn lane for 300’ storage length. Provide protected left turn phase for eastbound and westbound movements.(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #13) PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and reduce delay. SCHEDULE: All phases are scheduled between 2018 and 2020. (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering, ROW, & Administration $502,000 $765,000 Construction $3,968,000 1% for Art TOTAL $502,000 $765,000 $3,968,000 Packet Page 284 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Olympic View Dr. @ 174th St. SW Intersection Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $906,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50’ storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #17) PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2021 and 2026 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $180,000 Construction $726,000 1% for Art TOTAL $906,000 Packet Page 285 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Main St. @ 9th Ave Intersection Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,093,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The intersection is currently stop controlled for all approaches. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #2) PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve the Level of Service, which is currently LOS E (below City’s Level of Service standards: LOS D), to LOS B (w/ improvement). SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2021 and 2026 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $220,000 Construction $873,000 1% for Art TOTAL $1,093,000 Packet Page 286 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Walnut St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,093,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signal. The intersection is currently stop controlled for all approaches. (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2009 Transportation Plan: #7). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve the Level of Service. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2021 and 2026 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $220,000 Construction $873,000 1% for Art TOTAL $1,093,000 Packet Page 287 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 80th Ave W from 188th St SW to Olympic View Dr. Walkway and sight distance improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,520,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct ~ 3,000’ sidewalk on 80th Ave West between 188th St SW and 180th St SW and on 180th St SW between 80th Ave W and Olympic View Drive (ranked #6 in Long Walkway list in 2009 Transportation Plan). 80th Ave. W will be re-graded north of 184th St. SW, in order to improve sight distance. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Provides safe pedestrian access between Seaview Park, connecting to Olympic View Drive Walkway and Southwest County Park. Would create an additional safe walking route for kids attending Seaview Elementary School (188th St. SW). SCHEDULE: Engineering and construction are scheduled between 2018 and 2020 (unsecured funding for all phases). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $125,000 $125,000 Construction $1,270,000 1% for Art TOTAL $125,000 $125,000 $1,270,000 Packet Page 288 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 236th St. SW from Edmonds Way to Madrona Elementary School ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $420,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct an ~ 800’ sidewalk on the south side of 236th St. SW from SR-104 to Madrona Elementary as well as the addition of sharrows along that stretch. (This is only part of a stretch of Walkway project, which ranked #1 in the Long Walkway list in the 2009 Transportation Plan) PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route near Madrona Elementary School and along 236th St. SW. SCHEDULE: Construction is scheduled to take place in 2015. The project is funded through the Safe Routes to School Grant program. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration & ROW Construction $392,109 1% for Art TOTAL $392,109 Packet Page 289 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 2nd Ave. S from James St. to Main St. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $65,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 100’) on 2nd Ave. S between Main St. and James St. (Ranked #1 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: 2018 (Unsecured Funding) COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $65,000 Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $65,000 Packet Page 290 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Maple St. from 7th Ave. S to 8th Ave. S Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $65,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 250’) on Maple St. between 7th Ave. S and 8th Ave. S (ranked #3 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2018 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $65,000 1% for Art TOTAL $65,000 Packet Page 291 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Dayton St between 7th Ave. S and 8th Ave. S Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $82,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 250’) on Dayton St. between 7th Ave. S and 8th Ave. S (ranked #2 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2018 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $82,000 1% for Art TOTAL $82,000 Packet Page 292 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Sunset Ave Walkway from Bell St to Caspers St. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,350,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a multi-use path on the west side of the street, facing waterfront (~ 1/2 mile / more recent project, not included in the 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Temporary improvements have been installed to evaluate the alignment of the proposed multi-use path. The final design phase is on-hold until the evaluation period is completed. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study $10,000 Engineering & Administration Construction $2,099,000 1% for Art TOTAL $10,000 $2,099,000 Packet Page 293 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,306,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW (~ 2,700’). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #2 in the Long Walkway list of the 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non-motorized transportation to walk to / from school. SCHEDULE: Engineering scheduled for 2018 and construction in 2019 (grant application recently submitted to fund design phase / from Pedestrian and Bicycle Program). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $349,000 Construction $1,957,000 1% for Art TOTAL $349,000 $1,957,000 Packet Page 294 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $218,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install 150’ sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of stretch). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2018 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $41,000 Construction $177,000 1% for Art TOTAL $218,000 Packet Page 295 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Beach Rd. Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,085,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a sidewalk on Meadowdale Beach Dr. between 76th Ave. W and Olympic View Dr. (~3,800’). This is one of the last collectors in the City with no sidewalk on either side of the street (ranked #4 in Long Walkway Project list in 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route connecting a minor arterial w/ high pedestrian activity (Olympic View Dr.) to a collector with sidewalk on the east side of the street (76th Ave. W). Meadowdale Elementary School is directly north of the project on Olympic View Dr. SCHEDULE: Design scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding) and construction between 2021 and 2026. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 - 2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $325,000 $760,000 1% for Art TOTAL $325,000 $760,000 Packet Page 296 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Walnut from 3rd Ave. S to 4th Ave. S Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $190,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 350’) on Walnut St. between 3rd Ave. S and 4th Ave. S (ranked #5 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2018 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $190,000 1% for Art TOTAL $190,000 Packet Page 297 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Walnut from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $380,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 700’) on Walnut St. between 6th Ave. S and 7th Ave. S (ranked #4 in Short Walkway Project list in 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route. SCHEDULE: Engineering & Construction scheduled for 2020 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $380,000 1% for Art TOTAL $380,000 Packet Page 298 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 4th Ave Corridor Enhancement ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,700,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Corridor improvements along 4th Avenue to build on concept plan developed in the Streetscape Plan update (2006). (Project not included in 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection along 4th Ave. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the downtown by encouraging the flow of visitors between the downtown retail & the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Timing for design phase is crucial as the City addresses utility projects in the area & will assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the project implementation phase. SCHEDULE: Work on identifying grants for engineering services and construction is scheduled for 2018 and 2019 (pending additional grant funding and local match). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $1,425,000 $2,900,000 1% for Art TOTAL $1,425,000 $2,900,000 Packet Page 299 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W Walkway and Stormwater Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,657,681 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Installation of ~ 1,200’ of sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W. as well as sharrows. Stormwater improvements will also be incorporated into the project (ranked #8 in the Long Walkway list of the 2009 Transportation Plan). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety and create a safe pedestrian connection between 100th Ave. W and 104th Ave. W. SCHEDULE Engineering and construction are scheduled between 2014 and 2015. Funding was secured for the completion of the design and construction phases (through Safe Routes to School program). Stormwater improvements will be funded by the Stormwater Utility Fund 422. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $1,557,934 1% for Art TOTAL $1,557,934 Packet Page 300 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Olympic Ave. from Main St. to SR-524 / 196th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,249,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #3 in Long Walkway project list in 2009 Transportation Plan. Install new sidewalk on the east side of the street. Ex. sidewalk is unsafe because of rolled curb (~ 0.75 mile / ranked #3 in the Long Walkway list of the 2009 Transportation Plan) PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety and access to Yost Park and Edmonds Elementary. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2021 and 2026 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $200,000 Construction $1,049,000 1% for Art TOTAL $1,249,000 Packet Page 301 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 189th Pl. W from 80th Ave. W to 78th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $189,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked # 7 in Short Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan. Install 5’ sidewalk on either side of the street (approximately 750’). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety and create connection to ex. sidewalk on 189th Pl. W. This missing link will create a pedestrian connection from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2021 and 2026 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $35,000 Construction $154,000 1% for Art TOTAL $189,000 Packet Page 302 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 84th Ave. W between 188th St. SW and 186th St. SW Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $175,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2021 and 2026 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $35,000 Construction $140,000 1% for Art TOTAL $175,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #9 in Short Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan. Install 5’ sidewalk on the east side of the street (approximately 750’). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety and access for school kids walking to Seaview Elementary. Packet Page 303 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,050,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Ranked #9 in Long Walkway list from 2009 Transportation Plan. Install 5’ sidewalk on the north side of 238th St. SW (approximately ½ mile). PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve pedestrian safety along that stretch and creating safe pedestrian connection between Hwy. 99 and 76th Ave. W. SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled between 2021 and 2026 (unsecured funding). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration $210,000 Construction $840,000 1% for Art TOTAL $1,050,000 Packet Page 304 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Varies * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The traffic calming program is designed to assist residents and City staff in responding to neighborhood traffic issues related to speeding, cut-through traffic and safety. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Allows traffic concerns to be addressed consistently and traffic calming measures to be efficiently developed and put into operations. SCHEDULE: Annual program COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 1% for Art TOTAL $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 Packet Page 305 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 15th St. SW from Edmonds Way (SR-104) to 8th Ave. S ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $374,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct a missing link of sidewalk (approximately 600’) on 15th St. SW from Edmonds Way to 8th Ave. S. (new project, not included in the 2009 Transportation Plan) PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To provide a safe and desirable walking route for kids attending Sherwood Elementary. SCHEDULE: Construction documentation will be completed in 2015. The project is 100% grant funded (through Safe Routes to School program). COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $6,000 1% for Art TOTAL $6,000 Packet Page 306 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Trackside Warning System or Quiet Zone @ Dayton and Main St. RR Crossing ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $350,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install Trackside Warning System or Quiet Zone @ Dayton and Main St. Railroad Crossings. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Reduce noise level throughout the Downtown Edmonds area during all railroad crossings (@ both intersections). SCHEDULE: Engineering and Construction are scheduled for 2015 and 2016. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2026 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration 50,000 Construction $300,000 1% for Art TOTAL $50,000 $300,000 Packet Page 307 of 433 Packet Page 308 of 433 CFP STORMWATER Packet Page 309 of 433 Packet Page 310 of 433 $0 (Federal or State secured) Design $465,318 (Federal or State unsecured)$125,000 $327,818 $12,500 $1,495,954 (Debt/Stormwater Fees)$100,000 $375,000 $983,454 $37,500 $1,961,272 Total $100,000 $500,000 $1,311,272 $50,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) Possible Grant/TBD Study $5,312,500 (Federal or State unsecured)$160,000 $562,500 $825,000 $1,800,000 $1,950,000 $15,000 $1,920,500 (Debt/Stormwater)$203,000 $187,500 $275,000 $600,000 $650,000 $5,000 $7,233,000 Total $363,000 $750,000 $1,100,000 $2,400,000 $2,600,000 $20,000 $0 (Federal or State secured) Possible Grant/TBD Design $1,672,500 (Federal or State unsecured)$135,000 $375,000 $375,000 $637,500 $112,500 $37,500 $597,500 (Debt/Stormwater Fees)$85,000 $125,000 $125,000 $212,500 $37,500 $12,500 $2,270,000 Total $220,000 $500,000 $500,000 $850,000 $150,000 $50,000 Total CFP $11,464,272 Annual CFP Totals $683,000 $1,750,000 $2,911,272 $3,300,000 $2,750,000 $70,000 Totals Source 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $0 Total Federal & State (Secured)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,450,318 Total Federal & State (Unsecured)$295,000 $1,062,500 $1,527,818 $2,450,000 $2,062,500 $52,500 $4,013,954 Debt / Stormwater Fees $388,000 $687,500 $1,383,454 $850,000 $687,500 $17,500 Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements. Add lift station and other new infrastructure to reduce intersection flooding. Revenue Summary by Year Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Creek/Day lighting/Restoration Daylight channel and remove sediment to allow better connnectivity with the Puget Sound to benefit fish and reduce flooding. Perrinville Creek High Flow Reduction/Management Project Find solution to high peak stream flows caused by excessive stormwater runoff that erodes the stream, causes flooding and has negative impacts on aquatic habitat. Project Name Purpose Grant Opportunity Grant/Date Current Project Phase (2015-2020) Total Cost 2020Revenue Source 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 P a c k e t P a g e 3 1 1 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 3 1 2 o f 4 3 3 PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr – Daylighting ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $7,233,000 Edmonds Marsh as seen from the viewing platform. Previously restored section of Willow Creek. Source: www.unocaledmonds.info/clean-up/gallery.php PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Build on the feasibility study completed in 2013 that assessed the feasibility of day lighting the Willow Creek channel. The final project may include 23 acres of revegetation, construct new tide gate to allow better connectivity to the Puget Sound, removal of sediment, 1,100 linear ft of new creek channel lined with an impermeable membrane. Funds will be used for study and construction but exact breakdown cannot be assessed at this time. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The daylight of willow creek will help reverse the negative impacts to Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped. It will also help eliminate the sedimentation of the marsh and the transition to freshwater species and provide habitat for salmonids, including rearing of juvenile Chinook. SCHEDULE: 2015-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $363,000 $750,000 $20,000 Construction $1,100,000 $2,400,000 $2,600,000 1% for Art TOTAL $363,000 $750,000 $1,100,000 $2,400,000 $2,600,000 $20,000 Packet Page 313 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Perrinville Creek High Flow Reduction/Management Project ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $2,270,000 Perrinville Creek Channel illustrating the channel incision that will be addressed by restoration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A flow reduction study began in 2013 that will develop alternatives to implement in the basin. Projects are expected to begin the design and/or construction phases in 2014. It is expected that this project will be implemented with the City of Lynnwood (half the Perrinville basin is in Lynnwood) and Snohomish County (owner of the South County Park). Projects will likely be a combination of detention, infiltration, and stream bank stabilization. A $188,722 grant from the Department of Ecology is contributing funds to the 2013-2014 Study. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Urbanization of the Perrinville Creek Basin has increased flows in the creek, incision of the creek, and sedimentation in the low-gradient downstream reaches of the creek. Before any habitat improvements can be implemented, the flows must be controlled or these improvements will be washed away. SCHEDULE: 2015-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. $20,000 $50,000 $50,000 $85,000 $20,000 $50,000 Construction $200,000 $450,000 $450,000 $765,000 $130,000 1% for Art TOTAL $220,000 $500,000 $500,000 $850,000 $150,000 $50,000 Perrinville Creek Packet Page 314 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,961,272 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Add lift station and other new infrastructure. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: To reduce flooding at the intersection of Dayton St and Hwy 104. SCHEDULE: 2015-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study $100,000 Eng. & Admin. $500,000 $50,000 Construction $1,311,272 1% for Art TOTAL $100,000 $500,000 $1,311,272 $50,000 Packet Page 315 of 433 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2015-2020 DRAFT Packet Page 316 of 433 Packet Page 317 of 433 CITY OF EDMONDS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2015-2020) Table of Contents FUND DESCRIPTION DEPARTMENT PAGE GENERAL 112 Transportation Public Works 7 113 Multimodal Transportation Community Services 10 116 Building Maintenance Public Works 11 125 Capital Projects Fund Parks & Recreation/ Public Works 13 126 Special Capital / Parks Acquisition Parks & Recreation/ Public Works 15 129 Special Projects Parks & Recreation 16 132 Parks Construction (Grant Funding) Parks & Recreation 17 421 Water Projects Public Works 18 422 Storm Projects Public Works 19 423 Sewer Projects Public Works 21 423.76 Waste Water Treatment Plant Public Works 23 PARKS – PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 125 Capital Projects Fund Parks & Recreation/ Public Works 27 126 Special Capital / Parks Acquisition Parks & Recreation/ Public Works 54 132 Parks Construction (Grant Funding) Parks & Recreation 57 Packet Page 318 of 433 Packet Page 319 of 433 CIP GENERAL Packet Page 320 of 433 Packet Page 321 of 433 Capital Improvements Program Fund 112 - Transportation Projects PROJECT NAME CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) Preservation / Maintenance Projects Annual Street Preservation Program (Overlays, Chip Seals, Etc.)$940,000 $1,300,000 $1,650,000 $2,500,000 $2,800,000 $2,900,000 $3,000,000 $14,150,000 5th Ave S Overlay from Elm Way to Walnut St $15,799 $0 220th St. SW Overlay from 76th Ave W to 84th Ave W $1,040,000 $1,040,000 Citywide - Signal Improvements $258,000 $3,000 $325,000 $325,000 $653,000 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave @ 238th St. SW $750,000 $750,000 Safety / Capacity Analysis 212th St. SW / 84th Ave (Five Corners) Roundabout X $3,426,637 $295,000 $295,000 228th St. SW Corridor Safety Improvements X $308,501 $3,950,400 $1,943,500 $5,893,900 76th Ave W @ 212th St SW Intersection Improvements X $146,125 $711,587 $5,011,000 $5,722,587 SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave. W - Guardrail $50,000 $50,000 SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements X $100,000 $163,000 $852,000 $1,115,000 Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades $75,000 $300,000 $375,000 Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades $75,000 $300,000 $375,000 Main St. @ 9th Ave. S (Interim solution)X $10,000 $10,000 220th St. SW @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements X $500,000 $836,000 $3,628,000 $4,964,000 Arterial Street Signal Coordination Improvements $50,000 $50,000 Hwy 99 @ 212th St. SW Intersection Improvements X $502,000 $765,000 $3,968,000 $5,235,000 Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection Improvements X $341,000 $686,000 $2,695,000 $3,722,000 Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements X $484,000 $737,000 $3,825,000 $5,046,000 Citywide Protective / Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion $20,000 $20,000 SR-99 Gateway / Revitalization X $500,000 $4,500,000 $5,000,000 $10,000,000 Non-motorized transportation projects Sunset Ave Walkway from Bell St. to Caspers St.X $40,203 $10,000 $2,099,000 $2,109,000 238th St. SW from 100th Ave W to 104th Ave W X $99,747 $1,557,934 $1,557,934 15th St. SW from Edmonds Way to 8th Ave S X $323,196 $6,000 $6,000 236th St. SW from Edmonds Way / SR-104 to Madrona Elementary X $27,931 $392,109 $392,109 Hwy 99 Enhancement (Phase 3) $29,407 $305,000 $349,593 $654,593 ADA Curb Ramps along 3rd Ave S from Main St to Pine St $128,222 $10,000 $10,000 ADA Curb Ramps Improvements (as part of Transition Plan)$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $450,000 80th Ave W from 188th St SW to Olympic View Dr. Walkway Sight Distance Improvements X $125,000 $125,000 $1,270,000 $1,520,000 2nd Ave. S from James St. to Main St. Walkway X $65,000 $65,000 Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW Walkway X $349,000 $1,957,000 $2,306,000 Meadowdale Beach Rd. Walkway X $325,000 $325,000 Walnut St. from 3rd Ave. to 4th Ave. Walkway X $190,000 $190,000 Walnut St. from 6th Ave. to 7th Ave. Walkway X $380,000 $380,000 Audible Pedestrian Signals $25,000 $25,000 Maple St. from 7th Ave. S to 8th Ave. S Walkway X $65,000 $65,000 Dayton St. from 7th Ave. S to 8th Ave. S Walkway X $82,000 $82,000 216th ST. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W X $218,000 $218,000 Re-Striping of 76th Ave W from 220th St. SW to OVD $140,000 $650,000 $790,000 Citywide Bicycle Connections (additional bike lanes, sharrows & signage)$120,000 $120,000 $240,000 Traffic Calming Projects Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming (Sunset Ave, other stretches)X $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $60,000 Projects for 2015-2020 P a c k e t P a g e 3 2 2 o f 4 3 3 Traffic Planning Projects Transportation Plan Update $40,000 $140,000 $140,000 SR104 Transportation Corridor Study $44,000 $106,000 $106,000 Trackside Warning Sys or Quiet Zone @ Dayton/Main St. RR Crossings X $50,000 $300,000 $350,000 Alternatives Analysis to Study, 1) Waterfront Access Issues Emphasizing and Prioritizing Near Term Solutions to Providing Emergency Access, Also Including, But Not Limited to, 2) At Grade Conflicts Where Main and Dayton Streets Intersection BNSF Rail Lines, 3) Pedestrian/Bicycle Access, and 4) Options to the Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Terminal Project (Identified as Modified Alternative 2) within the 2004 Final Environmental Impact Statement $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 Total Projects $5,837,768 $10,147,030 $10,044,093 $2,510,000 $9,875,000 $14,529,000 $26,403,000 $73,508,123 Transfers Transfer to Fund 117 (212th St SW / 84th Ave W (Five Corners) Roundabout)$2,122 Debt Service Debt Service on Loan (1) 220th St Design $18,959 $18,869 $18,778 $18,687 $18,596 $19,506 $18,415 Debt Service on Loan (2) 220th St Construction $22,341 $22,235 $22,129 $22,023 $21,917 $21,811 $21,706 Debt Service on Loan (3) 100th Ave Road Stabilization $35,018 $34,854 $34,690 $34,525 $34,361 $34,196 $34,032 Total Debt & Transfers $78,440 $75,958 $75,597 $75,235 $74,874 $75,513 $74,153 Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning Cash Balance $481,154 $293,232 $246,479 $39,919 $300,684 $253,810 $523,297 Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax $140,000 $140,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 Transfer in - Fund 125 - REET 2 - Annual Street Preservation Program $300,000 $750,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Transfer in - Fund 126 - REET 1 - Annual Street Preservation Program $321,000 $260,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 Transfer in - General Fund for Annual Street Preservation Program $319,000 $550,000 $1,050,000 $650,000 $2,200,000 $850,000 $2,400,000 Transfer in - General Fund for Trackside Warning System or Quiet Zone $50,000 $300,000 Transfer in - Fund 421 for 212th @ 84th (Five Corners) Roundabout $665,000 Transfer in - Fund 422 for 212th @ 84th (Five Corners) Roundabout $762,000 Transfer in - Fund 421 for 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement $200,000 Transfer in - Fund 422 for 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement $68,500 Transfer in - Fund 423 for 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement $250,000 Transfer in - Mountlake Terrace for 228th St. SW Improvements (Overlay)$4,000 Transfer in - Fund 421 for 76th Ave W @ 212th St. Intersection Improvements $30,000 $70,000 $645,000 Transfer in - Fund 422 for 76th Ave W @ 212th St. Intersection Improvements $15,000 $15,000 $106,000 Transfer in - Fund 423 for 76th Ave W @ 212th St. Intersection Improvements $30,000 $70,000 $774,000 Transfer in - Fund 422 for 238th St. SW from 100th Ave. W to 104th Ave. W $29,909 $1,038,893 Transfer in - General Fund for SR-104 Transportation Corridor Study $44,000 $106,000 Transfer in- Fund 422 (STORMWATER)$103,000 $106,000 $109,000 $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $130,000 Traffic Impact Fees $100,000 $74,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 Total Revenues $3,340,063 $4,045,625 $4,060,479 $1,635,919 $3,450,684 $2,058,810 $3,883,297 P a c k e t P a g e 3 2 3 o f 4 3 3 Grants 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (Federal) for 5th Ave S Overlay $13,667 (Federal) for 220th St. SW Overlay from 76th Ave to 84th Ave $780,000 (Federal) - for Citywide - Cabinet Improvements / Ped. Countdown Display $258,000 $3,000 (Federal) for 212th @ 84th (Five Corners) Roundabout $1,674,451 $251,046 (Federal) for 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements $286,588 $3,431,900 $1,943,500 (Federal) for 76th Ave W @ 212th St SW Intersection Improvements $61,523 $467,096 $3,106,630 (Federal) Sunset Ave. Walkway from Bell St. to Caspers St.$34,776 $8,650 (State) 238th St. SW from 100th Ave W to 104th Ave W $69,838 $519,041 (State) 15th St. SW from Edmonds Way to 8th Ave S $323,196 $6,000 (Federal) 236th St. SW from Edmonds Way / SR-104 to Madrona Elementary $27,931 $392,109 (Federal) Hwy 99 Enhancement (Phase 3)$29,407 $305,000 $279,000 (Federal) ADA Curb Ramps along 3rd Ave. S from Main St. to Pine St.$90,000 (Verdantl) for Re-striping of 76th Ave from 220th St. SW to OVD $140,000 $650,000 (Verdant) for Citywide Bicycle Connections (bike lanes, sharrows & signage)$120,000 $120,000 Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Secured $2,869,377 $6,423,842 $6,099,130 $0 $0 $0 $0 Grants 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Grants/ Loans Sought / Funding (not Secured) Annual Street Preservation Program (Overlays, Chip Seals, Etc)$1,250,000 $1,450,000 Citywide Safety Improvements - Signal Cabinet $325,000 $325,000 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave W @ 238th St SW $750,000 76th @ 212th St SW Intersection Improvements 196th St SW @ 88th Ave W - Guardrail $50,000 196th St SW @ 88th Ave W - Intersection Improvements $100,000 $163,000 $852,000 Main St @ 3rd Ave Signal Upgrades $75,000 $300,000 Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades $75,000 $300,000 220th St SW @ 76th Ave W Intersection Improvements $500,000 $836,000 $3,625,000 Arterial Street Signal Coordination Improvements $50,000 Hwy 99 @ 212th St SW Intersection Improvements $502,000 $765,000 $3,968,000 Hwy 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection Improvements $341,000 $686,000 $2,695,000 Hwy. 99 @ 220th St. SW Intersection Improvements $484,000 $737,000 $3,825,000 SR-99 Gateway / Revitalization $500,000 $4,500,000 $5,000,000 Citywide Protective / Permissive Traffic Signal Conversion $20,000 Sunset Ave Walkway from Bell St to Caspers St $1,816,000 ADA Curb Ramps Improvements (as part of Transition Plan)$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 80th Ave / 188th St SW / Olympic View Dr Walkway & Sight Distance Improvements $125,000 $125,000 $1,270,000 2nd Ave From Main St to James St $65,000 Maplewood Dr. Walkway $349,000 $1,957,000 Meadowdale Beach Rd. Walkway $325,000 Walnut from 3rd to 4th Ave. Walkway $190,000 Walnut St. from 6th to 7th Ave. Walkway $380,000 Audible Pedestrian Signals $25,000 Maple St. from 7th to 8th Ave. Walkway $65,000 Dayton St. from 7th to 8th Ave. Walkway $82,000 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 72nd Ave W $189,000 Alternatives Study to Resolve Conflicts at Dayton St/Main St RR Crossings $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Sought / Funding (not secured) $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000 $6,753,000 $13,069,000 $23,390,000 Grant / Not Secured Funding Subtotal $2,869,377 $6,423,842 $6,099,130 $1,250,000 $6,753,000 $13,069,000 $23,390,000 Total Revenues & Grants $6,209,440 $10,469,467 $10,159,609 $2,885,919 $10,203,684 $15,127,810 $27,273,297 Total Projects ($5,837,768)($10,147,030)($10,044,093)($2,510,000)($9,875,000)($14,529,000)($26,403,000) Total Debt ($78,440)($75,958)($75,597)($75,235)($74,874)($75,513)($74,153) Ending Cash Balance $293,232 $246,479 $39,919 $300,684 $253,810 $523,297 $796,144 P a c k e t P a g e 3 2 4 o f 4 3 3 Capital Improvements Program Fund 113 - Multimodal Transportation PROJECT NAME CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) Edmonds Crossing WSDOT Ferry/Multimodal Facility X Unknown Total Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning Cash Balance (January 1st)$55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 State Transportation Appropriations - Current Law -Local Matching $ Federal Funding (Unsecured) ST2 Interest Earnings Total Revenues $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 Total Revenue $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 Total Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Ending Cash Balance $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 $55,859 Projects for 2015-2020 P a c k e t P a g e 3 2 5 o f 4 3 3 Capital Improvements Program Fund 116 - Building Maintenance PROJECT NAME CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) ADA Improvements- City Wide $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $30,000 Anderson Center Accessibility $17,874 $50,000 $50,000 Anderson Center Interior Painting $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 Anderson Center Exterior Painting $30,000 $30,000 Anderson Center Radiator Replacement $25,000 $85,000 $110,000 Anderson Center Exterior Repairs $75,000 $75,000 Anderson Center Blinds $10,000 $10,000 Anderson Center Asbestos Abatement $75,000 $75,000 Anderson Center Flooring/Gym $15,000 $25,000 $25,000 $65,000 Anderson Center Countertop Replacement $10,000 $10,000 Anderson Center Oil Tank Decommissioning $30,000 $30,000 Anderson Center Elevator Replacement $150,000 $150,000 Anderson Center Roof Replacement $300,000 $25,000 $325,000 Cemetery Building Gutter Replacement $10,000 $10,000 City Hall Carpet Replacement $50,000 $50,000 City Hall Elevator Replacement $150,000 $150,000 City Hall Exterior Cleaning and Repainting $25,000 $20,000 $45,000 City Hall Security Measures $20,000 $20,000 City Park Maint. Bldg. Roof $25,000 $25,000 ESCO III Project $269,253 $0 ESCO IV Project $300,000 $300,000 Fishing Pier Rehab $190,000 $0 Fire Station #16 Painting $5,000 $5,000 Fire Station #16 Carpet $30,000 $30,000 Fire Station #16 HVAC Replacement $30,000 $30,000 Fire Station #17 Carpet $12,000 $12,000 Fire Station #17 Interior Painting $15,000 $15,000 Fire Station #20 Carpet $15,000 $15,000 Fire Station #20 Interior Painting $10,000 $10,000 Fire Station #20 Stairs and Deck Replacement $40,000 $40,000 Grandstand Exterior and Roof Repairs $35,000 $50,000 $85,000 Library Plaza Appliance Replacement $4,000 $4,000 Library Plaza Brick Façade Addition $21,000 $21,000 Library Wood Trim $5,000 $5,000 Meadowdale Clubhouse Roof Replacement $20,000 $20,000 Meadowdale Flooring Replacement $25,000 $25,000 Meadowdale Clubhouse Gutter Replacement $20,000 $10,000 $30,000 Meadowdale Clubhouse Ext. Surface Cleaning $0 Meadowdale Clubhouse Fire Alarm Replacement $25,000 $25,000 Misc. Fire Sprinkler System Repairs $0 Public Safety/Fire Station #17 Soffit Installation $4,000 $4,000 Public Safety Exterior Painting $20,000 $20,000 Public Safety Council Chamber Carpet $10,000 $10,000 Public Safety HVAC Repairs & Maintenance $43,000 $0 Public Works Decant Improvements $60,000 $0 Senior Center Misc Repairs & Maintenance $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $60,000 Senior Center Siding/ Sealing (CDBG)$0 Total Projects $580,127 $365,000 $679,000 $215,000 $310,000 $232,000 $265,000 $2,066,000 Projects for 2015-2020 P a c k e t P a g e 3 2 6 o f 4 3 3 Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning Cash Balance (January 1st)-$96,490 $152,749 $144,349 $65,349 $100,349 $40,349 $58,349 Interest Earnings $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer from Gen Fund #001 and other $379,800 $266,600 $600,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Commerce Grants $187,566 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CDBG Grant (Unsecured)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WA Dept. of Ecology Grant $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WDFW Grant (Secured)$190,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WDFW Grant (Unsecured)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Utility Grant Funding (Estimated)$12,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 WA State HCPF Grant Funding (Secured)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Revenues $732,876 $509,349 $744,349 $315,349 $350,349 $290,349 $308,349 Total Revenue $732,876 $509,349 $744,349 $315,349 $350,349 $290,349 $308,349 Total Project ($580,127)($365,000)($679,000)($215,000)($310,000)($232,000)($265,000) Ending Cash Balance $152,749 $144,349 $65,349 $100,349 $40,349 $58,349 $43,349 P a c k e t P a g e 3 2 7 o f 4 3 3 Capital Improvements Program Fund 125 - Capital Projects Fund PROJECT NAME CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) Park Development Projects* Anderson Center Field / Court / Stage $20,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $125,000 Brackett's Landing Improvements $2,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $125,000 City Park Revitalization $5,000 $100,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $175,000 Civic Center Improvements X $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $60,000 Sunset Avenue Walkway $200,000 $200,000 Fishing Pier & Restrooms $10,000 $100,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $150,000 Former Woodway HS Improvements (with successful capital campaign)X see below $0 $40,000 $440,000 $400,000 $450,000 $0 $1,330,000 Maplewood Park Improvements $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $15,000 Marina Beach Park Improvements $0 $100,000 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $130,000 Mathay Ballinger Park $0 $20,000 $5,000 $5,000 $30,000 Meadowdale Clubhouse Grounds $0 $75,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $90,000 Meadowdale Playfields $250,000 $250,000 Pine Ridge Park Improvements $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $15,000 Seaview Park Improvements $0 $20,000 $5,000 $10,000 $35,000 Sierra Park Improvements $40,000 $70,000 $110,000 Yost Park / Pool Improvements $120,000 $120,000 $100,000 $25,000 $20,000 $120,000 $100,000 $485,000 Citywide Park Improvements* Citywide Beautification $30,000 $21,000 $22,000 Not Eligible Not Eligible Not Eligible N/A $43,000 Misc Paving $1,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $30,000 Citywide Park Improvements/Misc Small Projects $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $360,000 Sports Fields Upgrade / Playground Partnership $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $75,000 Specialized Projects* Aquatic Center Facility (dependent upon successful capital campaign)X $0 Trail Development* Misc Unpaved Trail / Bike Path Improvements $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $30,000 Planning Cultural Arts Facility Needs Study X $0 Edmonds Marsh / Hatchery Improvements X $60,000 $70,000 $60,000 $75,000 $10,000 $20,000 $235,000 Edmonds Cemetery Mapping Project $100,000 $100,000 Civic Center Master Plan $100,000 Pine Ridge Park Forest Management Study $50,000 $50,000 Total Project $323,000 $1,056,000 $842,000 $750,000 $945,000 $750,000 $255,000 $4,598,000 Transfers Transfer to Park Fund 132 (4th Ave Cultural Corridor)$25,000 Transfer to Park Fund 132 (Cultural Heritage Tour) Transfer to Park Fund 132 (Dayton St Plaza) Transfer to Park Fund 132 (City Park Revitalization) Transfer to Park Fund 132 (Former Woodway HS Improvements)X $655,000 Transfer to Street Fund 112 (Pavement Preservation Program)$300,000 $750,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Total Transfers $325,000 $1,405,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Total Project &Transfers $648,000 $2,461,000 $992,000 $900,000 $1,095,000 $900,000 $405,000 Projects for 2015-2020 P a c k e t P a g e 3 2 8 o f 4 3 3 Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning Cash Balance (January 1st)$1,508,584 $1,865,184 $308,184 $216,184 $216,184 $21,184 $21,184 Real Estate Tax 1/4% $1,000,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 Donations (Milltown, unsecured) Interest Earnings $4,600 $4,000 Total Revenues $2,513,184 $2,769,184 $1,208,184 $1,116,184 $1,116,184 $921,184 $921,184 Total Revenue $2,513,184 $2,769,184 $1,208,184 $1,116,184 $1,116,184 $921,184 $921,184 Total Project & Transfers ($648,000)($2,461,000)($992,000)($900,000)($1,095,000)($900,000)($405,000) Ending Cash Balance $1,865,184 $308,184 $216,184 $216,184 $21,184 $21,184 $516,184 *Projects in all categories may be eligible for 1% for art with the exception of planning projects. P a c k e t P a g e 3 2 9 o f 4 3 3 Capital Improvements Program Fund 126 - Special Capital/Parks Acquisition PROJECT NAME CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) Debt Service on City Hall $300,003 $0 Debt Service Marina Bch/Library Roof $80,528 $84,428 $83,228 $82,028 $80,828 $79,628 $83,428 $493,568 Debt Service on PSCC Purchase $57,998 $57,098 $56,198 $60,298 $54,298 $53,398 $52,498 $333,788 Debt Service on FAC Seismic retrofit $29,763 $29,874 $29,957 $29,621 $29,640 $29,630 $29,981 $178,703 Estimated Debt Payment on Civic Playfield Acquisition $0 $100,000 $153,750 $153,750 $153,750 $153,750 $153,750 $868,750 Total Debt $468,292 $271,400 $323,133 $325,697 $318,516 $316,406 $319,657 $1,874,809 Project Name Acquistion of Civic Field Misc. Open Space/Land $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Transfers Transfer to 132 for Waterfront / Tidelands Acquisition $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Transfer to Fund 112 for Annual Street Preservation Program $321,000 $260,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,510,000 Total Project & Transfers $521,000 $460,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $3,710,000 Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning Cash Balance (January 1st)$464,855 $477,893 $648,493 $577,360 $503,663 $437,147 $372,741 Real estate Tax 1/4%/1st Qtr % $1,000,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 Interest Earnings $2,330 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 Total Revenues $1,467,185 $1,379,893 $1,550,493 $1,479,360 $1,405,663 $1,339,147 $1,274,741 Grants 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Grants/ Loans Sought (not Secured) Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Secured $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Revenue & Grants & Subsidy $1,467,185 $1,379,893 $1,550,493 $1,479,360 $1,405,663 $1,339,147 $1,274,741 Total Debt ($468,292)($271,400)($323,133)($325,697)($318,516)($316,406)($319,657) Total Project & Transfers ($521,000)($460,000)($650,000)($650,000)($650,000)($650,000)($650,000) Ending Cash Balance $477,893 $648,493 $577,360 $503,663 $437,147 $372,741 $305,084 Projects for 2015-2020 P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 0 o f 4 3 3 Capital Improvements Program Fund 129 - Special Projects PROJECT NAME CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) State Route (SR) 99 International District Enhancements $13,653 $0 Total Projects $13,653 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning Balance (January 1st)$6,894 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 Investment Interest Total Revenues $6,894 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 Grants 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2106 2017 2018 2019 2020 PSRC Transportation Enhancement Grant (Secured) $22,681 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Grants $22,681 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Revenues & Grants $29,575 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 Total Construction Projects ($13,653)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Ending Cash Balance $15,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 $17,922 Projects for 2015-2020 P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 1 o f 4 3 3 Capital Improvements Program Fund 132 - Parks Construction PROJECT NAME CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) 4th Ave Corridor Enhancement $0 $1,425,000 $2,900,000 $4,325,000 Cultural Heritage Tour and Way-Finding Signage $7,015 $0 Dayton Street Plaza $60,000 $108,000 $108,000 Civic Center Acquisition $3,000,000 $100,000 $3,000,000 $6,100,000 Senior Center Parking Lot / Drainage $0 City Park Revitalization $372,100 $854,900 $854,900 Former Woodway HS Improvements $0 $655,000 $655,000 Waterfront Acquisition, demo, rehab $900,000 $0 Wetland Mitigation $12,517 Edmonds Marsh/Daylighting Willow Creek $200,000 Fishing Pier Rehab $1,300,000 Public Market (Downtown Waterfront)$0 Veteran's Plaza $10,000 Total Projects $1,361,632 $6,117,900 $100,000 $3,000,000 $1,425,000 $2,900,000 $0 $13,542,900 Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning Cash Balance (January 1st)$823,000 $1,386,902 $82,011 -$17,989 -$3,017,989 -$3,017,989 $282,912 Beginning Cash Balance Milltown Beginning Cash Balance Cultural Heritage Tour $2,500 Transfer in from Fund 117-200 for Cultural Heritage Tour Transfer in from Fund 120 for Cultural Heritage Tour Transfer in from Fund 125 for Cultural Heritage Tour Transfer in from Fund 127-200 for Cultural Heritage Tour $2,500 Transfer in from Fund 120 for Way-Finding Signage Grant Match Transfer in from Fund 125 for 4th Ave Corridor Enhancement Transfer in from Fund 125 for Dayton St. Plaza Transfer in from Fund 125 for City Park Revitalization Transfer in from Fund 125 for Former Woodway HS Improvements $500,000 Transfer in from Fund 125 for Senior Center Parking Lot Transfer in from Fund 126 for Waterfront Acquisition $200,000 $200,000 Transfer in from 01 for Edmonds Marsh $200,000 Transfer in from Fund 125 for Fishing Pier $100,000 Total Revenues $1,728,000 $1,686,902 $82,011 -$17,989 -$3,017,989 -$3,017,989 $282,912 Grants 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Grants/ Loans (Secured) 4th Ave / Cultural Heritage Tour (Preserve America/National Park Service)$2,500 Dayton Street Plaza (Arts Fest. Found./Hubbard Trust/Ed in Bloom) Interurban Trail (Federal CMAQ) Interurban Trail (State RCO) City Park Snohomish County Grant $80,000 City Park Spray Park (donations)$270,000 RCO State grant / City Park Revitalization $155,517 $313,009 Snohomish County Tourism for Way-Finding Conservation Futures/Waterfront Acquisition $500,000 Wetland Mitigation $12,517 Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Secured $1,020,534 $313,009 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Grants/ Loans Sought (not Secured) 4th Ave Corridor Enhancement (state, federal, other)$1,425,000 $2,900,000 RCO land acquisition grant $1,000,000 Bond funding $2,000,000 Grants/RCO Fishing Pier $1,200,000 Yearly Sub Total Grants/ Loans Sought (not secured) $0 $4,200,000 $0 $0 $1,425,000 $2,900,000 $0 Grants Subtotal $1,020,534 $4,513,009 $0 $0 $1,425,000 $2,900,000 $0 Total Revenues & Cash Balances & Grants $2,748,534 $6,199,911 $82,011 -$17,989 -$1,592,989 -$117,989 $282,912 Total Construction Projects (1,361,632.00)($6,117,900)(100,000)(3,000,000)($1,425,000)(2,900,000)$0 Ending Cash Balance $1,386,902 $82,011 -$17,989 -$3,017,989 -$3,017,989 -$3,017,989 $282,912 *Projects may be partially eligible for 1% for Art Projects for 2015-2020 P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 2 o f 4 3 3 Capital Improvements Program Fund 421 - Water Projects PROJECT NAME CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019 Total (2015-2020) 2013 Replacement Program $53,000 $0 2014 Replacement Program $1,860,784 $45,000 $45,000 2014 Waterline Overlays $190,000 $0 2015 Replacement Program $175,541 $2,737,151 $2,737,151 2015 Waterline Overlays $124,000 $124,000 2016 Replacement Program $391,788 $2,044,722 $2,436,510 2017 Replacement Program $302,948 $2,678,999 $2,981,947 2018 Replacement Program $400,000 $2,786,159 $3,186,159 2019 Replacement Program $416,000 $2,897,605 $3,313,605 2020 Replacement Program $432,640 $3,013,510 $3,446,150 2021 Replacement Program $449,946 $449,946 Five Corners Reservoir Recoating $110,000 $1,090,100 $1,200,100 76th Ave Waterline Replacement (includes PRV Impr)$87,870 $2,000 $2,000 Telemetry System Improvements $20,000 $71,100 $11,900 $12,400 $12,900 $13,400 $13,900 $135,600 2016 Water System Plan Update $86,100 $89,500 $175,600 Total Projects $2,387,195 $3,567,139 $3,539,170 $3,091,399 $3,215,059 $3,343,645 $3,477,356 $20,233,768 Transfers & Reinbursements Reinbursement to Sewer Utility Fund 423 (Ph1 SS Repl.)$380,000 $0 Reinbursement to Sewer Utility Fund 423 (Ph2 SS Repl.)$325,000 Reinbursement to Street Fund 112 (Five Corners)$665,000 $0 Reinbursement to Street Fund 112 (228th Project)$200,000 $200,000 Reinbursement to Street Fund 112 (212th & 76th Improvements)$30,000 $70,000 $70,000 Transfer to Fund 117 1% Arts (2014 Watermain)$833 $0 Transfer to Fund 117 1% Arts (2015 Watermain)$2,000 $2,000 Total Transfers $1,400,833 $272,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $272,000 Total Water Projects $3,788,028 $3,839,139 $3,539,170 $3,091,399 $3,215,059 $3,343,645 $3,477,356 $20,505,768 Revenues & Cash Balances 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning Balance (January 1st) Connection Fee Proceeds $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Interfund Transfer in from Fund 411 General Fund Fire Hydrant Improvements 2013 Watermain Fund 423 Reinbursement for 2014 WL Overlay $50,000 General Fund Fire Hydrant Improvements $180,000 $150,000 $114,600 $119,184 $123,900 $128,856 $134,010 2013 Bond Total Secured Revenue (Utility Funds, Grants Loans, misc) $255,000 $175,000 $139,600 $144,184 $148,900 $153,856 $159,010 Unsecured Revenue 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 New revenue, grants, loans, bonds, interest, transfers $5,400,000 $1,200,000 Total Unsecured Revenue $0 $0 $5,400,000 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $0 Total Revenues Total Projects & Transfers Ending Cash Balance Projects for 2015-2020 P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 3 o f 4 3 3 CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 1 - Replace Infiltration Pipe (near 107th Pl W) + infiltration system for 102nd Ave W. (See Note 1)X $369,614 $2,000 $2,000 105th & 106th Ave SW Drainage Improvement Project. (See Note 2)$73,000 $517,255 $517,255 Dayton St and Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements X $17,500 $100,000 $500,000 $1,311,272 $50,000 $1,961,272 Willow Creek Pipe Rehabilitation $550,607 $10,000 $560,607 Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Dr/Willow Cr - Final Feasibility Study / Marsh Restoration (See Note 2 & 4)X $274,000 $363,000 $750,000 $1,100,000 $2,400,000 $2,600,000 $20,000 $7,233,000 Northstream Culvert Abandonment South of Puget Dr - Assessment / Stabilization $28,000 $433,356 $433,356 Rehabilitation of Northstream Culvert under Puget Dr $50,000 $25,000 $75,000 Perrinville Creek High Flow Reduction and Retrofit Study (See Note 2) $300,809 $1,000 $1,000 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects (See Note 2)X $50,000 $220,000 $500,000 $500,000 $850,000 $150,000 $50,000 $2,270,000 Vactor Waste handling (Decant) facility upgrade (See Note 2)$152,681 $2,000 $2,000 88th Ave W and 194th St SW $25,000 $253,400 $253,400 Improvements Dayton St. between 3rd & 9th $0 $108,809 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $2,308,809 City-wide Drainage Replacement Projects $236,000 $224,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,300,000 $1,500,000 $5,724,000 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects $20,000 $62,000 $64,000 $66,000 $68,000 $68,000 $70,000 $398,000 Storm System Video Assessment $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $50,000 $50,000 $1,100,000 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan (including asset management plan)$128,750 $132,613 $261,363 $1,546,604 $2,586,820 $4,368,357 $5,469,885 $4,818,000 $4,168,000 $1,690,000 $23,101,062 Perrinville Creek Basin Projects Total Project Capital Improvements Program PROJECT NAME SW Edmonds Basin Study Implementation Projects Edmonds Marsh Related Projects Projects for 2015-2020Fund 422 Storm Northstream Projects Annually Funded Projects 5 Year Cycle Projects Public Works Yard Water Quality Upgrades Storm Drainage Improvement Projects P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 4 o f 4 3 3 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 3 - Drainage portion of 238th SW Sidewalk project (connect sumps on 238th St SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System)$25,909 $709,180 $709,180 Five Corners Roundabout $762,000 $100,000 $100,000 228th SW Corridor Improvements $0 $68,500 $68,500 76th Ave W & 212th St SW Intersection Improvements $15,000 $30,000 $30,000 Stormwater Utility - Transportation Projects $103,000 $106,000 $109,000 $112,000 $116,000 $19,000 $123,000 $585,000 Total Transfer to 112 Fund $905,909 $913,680 $109,000 $212,000 $116,000 $19,000 $123,000 $1,492,680 SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 1 - Replace infiltration pipe (near 107th Pl W) + infiltration system for 102nd Ave W.$3,546 $0 SW Edmonds Basin Study Project 3 - Drainage portion of 238th SW Sidewalk project (connect sumps on 238th St SW to Hickman Park infiltration system)$0 $5,904 $5,904 Five Corners Roundabout $7,620 $0 228th SW Corridor improvements $0 $685 $685 76th Ave W & 212th St SW Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 Total Transfer to 117 Fund $11,166 $6,589 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,589 $917,075 $920,269 $109,000 $212,000 $116,000 $19,000 $123,000 $1,499,269 $2,463,679 $3,507,089 $4,477,357 $5,681,885 $4,934,000 $4,187,000 $1,813,000 $24,600,331 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $200,000 $70,000 $168,852 X $50,000 $115,000 $623,852 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $3,500,000 $258,628 X $160,000 $562,500 $825,000 $1,800,000 $1,950,000 $15,000 X $135,000 $375,000 $375,000 $637,500 $112,500 $37,500 X $0 $125,000 $327,818 $12,500 $0 $0 $0 $553,628 $4,562,500 $1,527,818 $2,450,000 $2,062,500 $52,500 1. 238th St SW drainage project has been merged with sidewalk project and is now under "Transfers to 112- Street Fund." 2. All or part of this project funded by secured grants or grants will be pursued, see Revenue section for details. 3. Assumed 50% grant funded in 2015 4. Assumes grant funding is 75% of total project costs per year beginning 2016 5. Assumes grant funding is 25% of total project costs per year beginning 2016 Grants (Unsecured) - Dayton St & Hwy 104 Drainage Improvements (See Note 4) Total Secured Revenues Total Project & Transfers Ending Cash Balance Unsecured Revenue 2014-2020 Proceeds of Long-term debt (Bonds) Total Unsecured Revenues Grants (Unsecured) - Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects (See Note 3 & 4) Notes: Estimated Connection Fees (capital facilities charge) Beginning Balance (January 1st) Total Revenue Grants (Secured) - Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr - Feasibility Study/Marsh Restoration Grants (Secured) - Perrinville Creek High Flow Reduction & Retrofit Study Grants (Secured) - Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects Grants (Secured) - Waste handling facility upgrade Grants (Unsecured) - Edmonds Marsh/Shellabarger Cr/Willow Cr - Feasibility Study/Marsh Restoration (See Note 4) Grant (Secured) - 105th & 106th Ave SW Drainage Improvement Project Grant (Unsecured) - 105th & 106th Ave SW Drainage Improvement Project (Seet Note 3) Projects for 2014-2019 Proceeds of Long-term debt (Bonds) Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 Total Project & Transfers Total Transfers To 117 - Arts Transfers To 112 - Street Fund P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 5 o f 4 3 3 CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) Lift Stations 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, & 15 $245,000 $3,000 $3,000 Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer Replacement $1,530,799 $22,500 $22,500 Phase 2 Sanitary Sewer Replacement $2,149,970 $55,000 $55,000 2015 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements $184,961 $2,051,073 $2,051,073 2015 Sewerline Overlays $117,600 $117,600 2016 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements $411,622 $1,506,704 $1,918,326 2017 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements $278,750 $1,551,905 $1,830,655 2018 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements $287,113 $1,598,462 $1,885,575 2019 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements $295,726 $1,646,416 $1,942,142 2020 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements $304,598 $1,695,809 $2,000,406 2021 Sewer Replacement / Rehab / Improvements $313,736 $313,736 2013 CIPP Rehabilitation $58,706 $0 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation $5,000 $524,600 $400,000 $412,000 $424,360 $437,091 $450,204 $2,648,254 224th Sanitary Sewer Replacement Project $30,895 $0 Lift Station 1 Metering & Flow Study $100,000 $100,000 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study $100,000 $100,000 $4,205,331 $3,385,395 $2,185,454 $2,251,018 $2,318,548 $2,388,105 $2,459,748 $14,988,267 Reinbursement to Fund 421 (2014 WL Overlay)$50,000 $0 Reinbursement to Fund 112 (228th Project)$250,000 $250,000 Reinbursement to Fund 112 (212th & 76th Improvements)$30,000 $70,000 $70,000 $80,000 $320,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $320,000 $4,285,331 $3,705,395 $2,185,454 $2,251,018 $2,318,548 $2,388,105 $2,459,748 $15,308,267 Capital Improvements Program Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitations Sewer Main Replacement and CIPP Infiltration & Inflow Study & Projects Total Projects, Transfers & Reinbursements Transfers & Reinbursements Total Transfers Projects for 2015-2020 PROJECT NAME Fund 423 - Sewer Projects Total Projects P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 6 o f 4 3 3 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $380,000 $325,000 $733,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 $0 $0 $5,800,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,800,000 $0 $900,000 $0 $0 Reinbursement in Fund 421 (Phase 2 Sewer Replacement) Reinbursement in Fund 421 (Phase 1 Sewer Replacement) Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 Beginning Balance (January 1st) Sewer Connection Fees Ending Cash Balance Total Secured Revenue (Utility Funds, Grants Loans, misc) Unsecured Revenue 2014-2020 New revenue, grants, loans, bonds, interest, transfers Total Unsecured Revenue Total Revenues Total Projects & Transfers P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 7 o f 4 3 3 Capital Improvements Program Fund 423.76 - WWTP PROJECT NAME CFP 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total (2015-2020) Repair and Replacement $18,000 $200,000 $300,000 $100,000 $125,000 $725,000 Construction Projects - In House $133,000 $20,000 $50,000 $70,000 Construction Projects Contracted $955,728 $1,482,247 $2,691,424 $2,000,000 $5,350,000 $875,000 $875,000 $13,273,671 Debt Service - Principle and Interest $255,385 $256,166 $256,296 $255,117 $254,499 $255,231 $255,848 $1,533,157 Total Project $1,362,113 $1,758,413 $2,997,720 $2,455,117 $5,904,499 $1,230,231 $1,255,848 Projects less revenue from outside partnership $1,290,913 $1,459,713 $2,984,520 $2,441,917 $5,891,299 $1,217,031 $1,255,848 Revenues and Cash Balances 2014-2020 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Beginning Cash Balance (January 1st)$200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Intergovernmental $1,290,913 $1,459,713 $2,984,520 $2,441,917 $5,891,299 $1,217,031 $1,255,848 Interest Earnings $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 Miscellaneous (biosolids, Lynnwood, etc)$13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 Grants, Incentives and Rebate for Engergy Eff. Projects $58,000 $285,500 Subtotal $1,562,113 $1,958,413 $3,197,720 $2,655,117 $6,104,499 $1,430,231 $1,455,848 Total Revenue $1,562,113 $1,958,413 $3,197,720 $2,655,117 $6,104,499 $1,430,231 $1,455,848 Total Project ($1,362,113)($1,758,413)($2,997,720)($2,455,117)($5,904,499)($1,230,231)($1,255,848) Ending Cash Balance $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Interest earned estimated at 0.75% per year Contribution breakdown by agency 2014 Estimate 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Edmonds 50.79%$655,616 $741,344 $1,515,748 $1,240,176 $2,992,014 $618,094 $637,808 Mountlake Terrace 23.17%$299,156 $338,274 $691,633 $565,890 $1,365,250 $282,035 $291,030 Olympic View Water & Sewer District 16.55%$213,659 $241,597 $493,968 $404,162 $975,069 $201,431 $207,855 Ronald Sewer District 9.49%$122,482 $138,498 $283,171 $231,689 $558,966 $115,472 $119,155 TOTALS 100.00%$1,290,913 $1,459,713 $2,984,520 $2,441,917 $5,891,299 $1,217,031 $1,255,848 Projects for 2014-2019 P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 8 o f 4 3 3 P a c k e t P a g e 3 3 9 o f 4 3 3 CIP PARKS PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Packet Page 340 of 433 Packet Page 341 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Anderson Center Field/Court/Stage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $145,000 700 Main Street, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits 2.3 acres; zoned public neighborhood park/openspace field PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Upgrades to youth sports field, picnic and playground amenities and children’s play equipment. Replacement and renovation of amphitheater in 2015 with improved courtyard area and drainage. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: As a neighborhood park, the Frances Anderson Center serves the community with various sports, playground and field activities including various special events. Upgrade and additions essential to meet demand for use. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $20,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 1% for Art TOTAL $20,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 * all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. Packet Page 342 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Brackett’s Landing Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $125,000 South: Main Street and Railroad Avenue south of Edmonds Ferry Terminal on Puget Sound North: 2.7 acres with tidelands and adjacent to Department of Natural Resources public tidelands with Underwater Park South: 2.0 acres with tidelands south of ferry terminal. Regional park/Zoned commercial waterfront. Protected as public park through Deed-of-Right; partnership funding IAC/WWRC/LWCF /DNR-ALEA & Snohomish Conservation Futures PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape beautification, irrigation, furnishings/bench maintenance, exterior painting, repairs, jetty improvements/repair, north cove sand, habitat improvement, fences, interpretive signs, structure repairs, sidewalk improvements, restroom repairs. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Retention of infrastructure for major waterfront park, regional park that serves as the gateway to Edmonds from the Kitsap Peninsula. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $2,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 1% for Art TOTAL $2,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $100,000 $5,000 $5,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 343 of 433 PROJECT NAME: City Park Revitalization ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,335,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Revitalize City Park play area with new play equipment and addition of a spray park amenity to be used in the summer. Spray parks have become very popular in many communities as replacements for wading pools that are no longer acceptable to increased health department regulations. These installations create no standing water and therefore require little maintenance and no lifeguard costs. Staff will seek voluntary donations for construction costs. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project combines two play areas and the completion of the master plan from 1992. This is very competitive for State grant funding, as it will be using a repurposing water system. This will be a much valued revitalization and addition to the City’s oldest and most cherished park. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $5,000 $100,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 1% for Art TOTAL $5,000 $100,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 *all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts Packet Page 344 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Complex Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $700,000 6th Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County 8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Park Development Bleacher/stadium repairs, infield mix, baseball/softball turf repair, retaining wall, fence and play structure replacement, skate park and facility amenities, tennis and sports courts repair and resurfacing, irrigation. Landscape and site furnishing improvements. Master Plan in 2016, development improvements based on Master Plan in 2020. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for Civic Center Field. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 10,000 1% for Art TOTAL $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 10,000 *all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 345 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Sunset Avenue Walkway ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,876,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Provide a sidewalk on the west side of Sunset Ave with expansive views of the Puget Sound and the Olympic Mountains. The sidewalk will connect the downtown business district, surrounding neighborhoods, water access points, and the existing parks and trails system. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This sidewalk has been a priority for the City of Edmonds for several years. It is included in 5 different City plans, the Transportation Improvement Plan, Non-Motorized Section; the Parks Recreation and Open Plan; the City comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan; the Capital Improvement Plan; and the Shoreline Master Program. Specifically, the Parks Recreation and Open Space Plan identified Sunset Avenue Overlook priorities, namely improved connectivity and multi-modal access, complete the bicycle and pedestrian route system, identify scenic routes and view areas, and landscape improvements. SCHEDULE: COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $200,000 1% for Art TOTAL $200,000 Packet Page 346 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Fishing Pier & Restrooms ESTIMATED COST: $1,350,000 LWCF/IAC Acquisition and Development Project PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Fishing pier parking lot landscape improvements. Re-tile and renovate restroom facilities. Electrical upgrade, rail and shelter replacements / renovations. Work with WDFW on structural repairs of concrete spalling on pier subsurface. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvements to retain capital assets and enhance western gateway to the Puget Sound. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $10,000 $1,300,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 1% for Art TOTAL $10,000 $1,300,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 347 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic Complex at the Former Woodway High School ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,830,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District, community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and undermaintained facility with great potential as community multi-use active park. Site has existing controlled access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees. SCHEDULE: 2013-2019 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $500,000 $40,000 $440,000 $400,000 $450,000 1% for Art TOTAL $500,000 $ $40,000 $440,000 $400,000 $450,000 * all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 348 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Maplewood Park Improvements ESTIMATED COST: $15,000 89th Place West and 197th Street SW, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County 12.7 acres (10.7 acres Open Space & 2 acres Neighborhood Park) Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the picnic, roadway, parking, play area and natural trail system to Maplewood Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the neighborhood park system. SCHEDULE: 2013, 2016 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $5,000 $5,000 $5000 1% for Art TOTAL $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 349 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Marina Beach Park Improvements ESTIMATED COST: $130,000 South of the Port of Edmonds on Admiral Way South, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County 4.5 acres / Regional Park / Zoned Commercial Waterfront, marina beach south purchased with federal transportation funds. WWRC / IAC Acquisition Project; Protected through Deed-of-Right RCW PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Expand parking area. Portable restroom upgrades. Repair and improvements to off-leash area. Replace play structure and install interpretive sign. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset to the regional waterfront park system. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $100,000 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 1% for Art TOTAL $100,000 $5,000 $10,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. Packet Page 350 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Mathay Ballinger Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $30,000 78th Place W. & 241st. St. at Edmonds City Limits. 1.5 acres/Neighborhood Park/Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Install path from Interurban Trail spur terminal to parking lot. Replace play structure and improve picnic area. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset in the neighborhood park system. SCHEDULE: 2013 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $20,000 $5,000 $5,000 1% for Art TOTAL $20,000 $5,000 $5,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 351 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Clubhouse Grounds ESTIMATED COST: $90,000 6801 N. Meadowdale Road, Edmonds City limits, within Snohomish County 1.3 acres / Neighborhood Park / Zoned RS20 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improvements to the parking area, wooded area, trail system and landscaping of exterior clubhouse at Meadowdale Clubhouse site. Replace playground. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain site as an asset with installation that provides community use of the facility and north Edmonds programming for day care, recreation classes and preschool activities. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $75,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 1% for Art TOTAL $75,000 $5,000 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 352 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Meadowdale Playfields ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $3,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with City of Lynnwood and Edmonds School District to renovate Meadowdale Playfields, installation of synthetic turf for year around play. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Partnership to leverage funds and increase field use for Edmonds citizens. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Engineering & Administration Construction 250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 1% for Art TOTAL $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 Packet Page 353 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $15,000 83rd Avenue West and 204th St. SW, Edmonds City Limits, within Snohomish County 22 acres (20 acres zoned openspace/2 acres neighborhood park) Zoned Public; Adopted Master Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Forest improvements, habitat improvements, tree planting, wildlife habitat attractions, trail improvements, signs, parking. Natural trail links under Main Street connecting to Yost Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Retention of natural open space habitat site and regional trail connections. SCHEDULE: 2015 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 1% for Art TOTAL $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 New additions meet the 1% for the Arts Ordinance requirements Packet Page 354 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Seaview Park Improvements ESTIMATED COST: $35,000 80th Street West and 186th Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits 5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public; Purchased and developed with LWCF funds through IAC; protected with Deed- Of-Right PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Annual repair and upgrade to facilities and fields. Re-surface tennis courts, pathway improvements, and play area maintenance. Renovate restrooms. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children’s play area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, restroom facilities, basketball court, parking and tennis courts. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $20,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $10,000 1% for Art TOTAL $20,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $10,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 355 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Sierra Park Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $110,000 80th Street West and 191th Street SW, Snohomish County, within Edmonds City limits 5.5 acres; Neighborhood Park/ Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Improve pathways and interpretive braille signs. Field renovation to include field drainage for turf repair. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Site serves as neighborhood park with children’s play area, open lawn, softball/baseball fields and soccer fields, portable restroom facilities, basketball hoops, parking and Braille interpretive trail for the blind. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $40,000 $70,000 1% for Art TOTAL $40,000 $70,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 356 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Yost Park/Pool Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $605,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Pool replastering, tile work, and annual anticipated and unanticipated repairs. Add in-pool play amenities. Park site improvements and repairs to trails and bridges, picnicking facilities, landscaping, parking, tennis/pickleball courts and erosion control. ADA improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Beautiful natural area serves as upland area for environmental education programs as well as enjoyable setting for seasonal Yost Pool users. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $120,000 $120,000 $100,000 $25,000 $20,000 $120,000 $100,000 1% for Art TOTAL $120,000 $120,000 $100,000 $25,000 $20,000 $120,000 $100,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. Packet Page 357 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Citywide Beautification ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $73,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Beautification citywide to include library, Senior Center, outdoor plaza, city park, corner parks, irrigation, planting, mulch, FAC Center, vegetation, tree plantings, streetscape/gateways/street tree planting, flower basket poles. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improve beautification citywide and provide comprehensive adopted plan for beautification and trees. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 After 2016, this expense will no longer be eligible out of REET. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $30,000 $21,000 $22,000 1% for Art TOTAL $30,000 $21,000 $22,000 Not Eligible Packet Page 358 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Paving ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $31,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Includes miscellaneous small paving and park walkway improvements citywide. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvement needs citywide in park system. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $1,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 1% for Art TOTAL $1,000 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 * all or a portion of these projects may qualify for 1% for the Arts. Packet Page 359 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Citywide Park Improvements / Misc Small Projects ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $400,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Citywide park facility and public landscaping improvements including signage, interpretive signs, buoys, tables, benches, trash containers, drinking fountains, backstops, bike racks, lighting, small landscaping projects, play areas and equipment. Landscape improvements at beautification areas and corner parks, public gateway entrances into the city and 4th Avenue Corridor from Main St. to the Edmonds Center for the Arts, SR 104, street tree and streetscape improvements. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for citywide park facilities and streetscape improvements in public areas. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering / Administration Construction $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 1% for Art TOTAL $40,000 $40,000 $40,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 70000 Packet Page 360 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Sports Field Upgrade / Playground Partnerships ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $100,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Partnerships with local schools, organizations, or neighboring jurisdictions to upgrade additional youth ball field or play facilities or playgrounds to create neighborhood park facilities at non-City facilities. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Annual partnerships with matching funds to create additional facilities. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Engineering & Administration Construction $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 1% for Art TOTAL $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000 Packet Page 361 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Aquatic Center at Yost Park ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $5,000,000 – $23,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Implement recommendations of the Aquatics Feasibility Study completed in 2009. Six scenarios were presented and the plan recommended by the consultants was a year round indoor pool with an outdoor recreational opportunity in the summer. The project is dependent upon a public vote. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The current Yost Pool, built in 1972, is nearing the end of its life expectancy. The comprehensive study done in 2009 assessed the needs and wants of Edmonds citizens in regard to its aquatic future as well as the mechanical condition of the current pool. SCHEDULE: COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 362 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Unpaved Trail/Bike Path/Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $ 30,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Complete portions of designated trail through public parks to meet the goals of the Bicycle Plan and Pathway Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Walking and connections was listed as a high priority in the comprehensive Park Plan from public survey data. Creating trails, paths and bike links is essential to meet the need for the community. Provides for the implementation of the citywide bicycle path improvements and the elements and goals of the citywide walkway plan. Linked funding with engineering funding. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 1% for Art TOTAL 0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 * all or part of these projects may qualify for 1% for the Arts. Packet Page 363 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Cultural Arts Facility Needs Study ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $unk PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Initiate feasibility study of providing and promoting Cultural / Arts facilities for the City of Edmonds. The need for visual and performing arts facilities is a high priority stated in the adopted updated Community Cultural Arts Plan 2001 and in the 2008 update process. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The City of Edmonds desires to secure and provide for public Cultural Arts facilities in the community. The emphasis on the arts as a high priority creates the need to study performance, management and long term potential for arts related facilities. SCHEDULE: COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 364 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh/Hatchery Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $295,000 South of Dayton Street and Harbor Square, east of BSNF railroad, west of SR 104, north of UNOCAL 23.2 acres; Natural Open Space / Zoned Open Space PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to support day-lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Hatchery repairs as needed. Work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co-fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available through various agencies and foundations. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 2020 Planning/Study 35,000 $45,000 Engin. & Admin. Construction $25,000 $25,000 $60,000 $75,000 $10,000 $20,000 1% for Art TOTAL $60,000 $70,000 $60,000 $75,000 $10,000 $20,000 Packet Page 365 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Cemetery Mapping ESTIMATED COST:$ 100,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Edmonds Memorial Cemetery was deeded to the City in 1982. The City has been operating the cemetery with no markings, rows, aisles, or surveyed mapping. It is essential that the City survey/map/and mark the cemetery so as to effectively manage the plots. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Operations of a public cemetery, with effective and accurate stewardship. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study $100,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $100,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 366 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Civic Center Complex Improvements ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $700,000 6th Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County 8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Park Development Bleacher/stadium repairs, infield mix, baseball/softball turf repair, retaining wall, fence and play structure replacement, skate park and facility amenities, tennis and sports courts repair and resurfacing, irrigation. Landscape and site furnishing improvements. Master Plan in 2016, development improvements based on Master Plan in 2020. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Overall capital improvements for Civic Center Field. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 10,000 1% for Art TOTAL $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 10,000 *all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 367 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Pine Ridge Park Forest Management Study ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $50,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Hire consultant to develop a plan for best forest management practices in Pine Ridge Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This forest park is under stress from over-mature trees especially alder and others. This study will give the Parks Division necessary guidance to better manage this park to become a more healthy forest and open space. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study $50,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $50,000 Packet Page 368 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Debt Service on Approved Capital Projects and Acquisitions ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,006,059 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Approximate annual debt service payments on: City Hall: Debt retired end of 2014 Marina Beach / Library Roof: $ $82,261 PSCC (Edmonds Center for the Arts): $55,631 Anderson Center Seismic Retrofit: $29,784 PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Debt service to pay for approved capitol projects SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $592,564 $171,400 $169,383 $171,947 $164,766 $162,656 165,907 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 369 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Miscellaneous Open Space/Land ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,000,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquisition of properties when feasible that will benefit citizens that fit the definitions and needs identified in the Parks Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Fulfills needs of citizens for parks, recreation and open space. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $0 0 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 200,000 200,000 Packet Page 370 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Waterfront/Tidelands Acquisition ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,400,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquire waterfront parcels and tidelands wherever feasible to secure access to Puget Sound for public use as indentified in the Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public ownership of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Packet Page 371 of 433 PROJECT NAME: 4th Avenue Corridor Enhancement ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $4,325,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Begin 4th Avenue site development with temporary and/or moveable surface elements and amenities to begin drawing attention and interest to the corridor and create stronger visual connection between Main Street and the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Possible projects may include surface art, interpretive signage and wayfinding, or low level lighting. The Cultural Heritage Walking Tour project, funded in part with a matching grant from the National Park Service Preserve America grant program, will be implemented in 2011-12. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic & provide a strong visual connection along 4th Ave. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor & contribute to the economic vitality in the downtown by encouraging the flow of visitors between the downtown retail & the Edmonds Center for the Arts. Timing for 30% design phase is crucial as the City addresses utility projects in the area & will assist the City in the process of identifying & acquiring funding sources for the total project implementation phase. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $1,425,000 $2,900,000 1% for Art TOTAL $1,425,000 $2,900,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 372 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Cultural Heritage Tour and Way-Finding Signage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $7015 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Create a downtown Edmonds walking tour highlighting a dozen historic sites with artist made interpretive markers, and add way-finding signage for the downtown area. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Promote tourism and economic development in the core downtown. The walking tour and interpretive signage focuses on local history and as unique artist made pieces also reflect the arts orientation of the community. Improved way-finding signage which points out major attractions and services/amenities such as theaters, museums, beaches, train station, shopping, dining and lodging promotes both tourism and economic vitality in the downtown /waterfront activity center. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $7015 1% for Art TOTAL $7015 Packet Page 373 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Dayton Street Plaza ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $168,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Renovate small park and plaza at north end of old public works building, 2nd & Dayton Street. Improve landscaping, plaza, and accessibility. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Capital improvements to public gathering space and creation of additional art amenities and streetscape improvements in downtown on main walking route. Financial support from Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation, Hubbard Foundation and Edmonds in Bloom. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction $60,000 $108,000 1% for Art TOTAL $60,000 $108,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 374 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Civic Playfield Acquisition and/or Development ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $6.1M 6th Street N. and Edmonds Street, Edmonds City limits, Snohomish County 8.1 acres / property owned and leased from Edmonds School District until 2021; Community Park/Zoned Public PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquire or work with the School District to develop this 8.1 acre property for continued use as an important community park, sports tourism hub and site of some of Edmonds largest and most popular special events in downtown Edmonds. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Gain tenure and control in perpetuity over this important park site for the citizens of Edmonds. SCHEDULE: 2014-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2019-2025 Acquisition $20,000 $3M Planning/Study 100,000 Eng. & Admin. Construction $3M 1% for Art TOTAL $20,000 $3M $100,000 $3M * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 375 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Senior Center Parking Lot/Drainage ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $500,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rehabilitate South County Senior Center parking lot including pavement re-surfacing, storm water/drainage management, effective illumination and landscaping. Seek grant opportunities and partnership opportunities. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Improvements to retain capital assets and provide safety and better accessibility for Seniors. SCHEDULE: COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 376 of 433 PROJECT NAME: City Park Revitalization ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $1,335,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Revitalize City Park play area with new play equipment and addition of a spray park amenity to be used in the summer. Spray parks have become very popular in many communities as replacements for wading pools that are no longer acceptable to increased health department regulations. These installations create no standing water and therefore require little maintenance and no lifeguard costs. Staff will seek voluntary donations for construction costs. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: This project combines two play areas and the completion of the master plan from 1992. This is very competitive for State grant funding, as it will be using a repurposing water system. This will be a much valued revitalization and addition to the City’s oldest and most cherished park. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $372,100 $854,900 1% for Art TOTAL $372,100 $854,900 *all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the arts Packet Page 377 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Community Park / Athletic Complex at the Former Woodway High School ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $11,535,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Develop community park and regional athletic complex with lighted fields and recreational amenities in partnership with Edmonds School District, community colleges, user groups, and other organizations. Development dependent upon successful regional capital campaign. $10m - $12M project. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The site is currently an underutilized and undermaintained facility with great potential as community multi-use active park. Site has existing controlled access, greenbelt, parking and 4-court tennis facility with substandard fields. Highly urbanized area with 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance supported by user fees. SCHEDULE: 2014-2025 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020- 2025 Planning/Study $655,000 Engineering & Administration Construction 1% for Art TOTAL $655,000 * all or a portion of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 378 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Waterfront Acquisition, demolition, rehabilitation of land ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $900,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Acquire waterfront parcel, demolish existing structure, and restore beachfront to its natural state. This has been a priority in the Parks, Recreation & Open Space Comprehensive Plan. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: Public ownership of waterfront and tidelands on Puget Sound, restoration of natural habitat. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL 900,000 Packet Page 379 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Wetland Mitigation ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $12,517 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to support day-lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co-fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available through various agencies and foundations. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $12,517 1% for Art TOTAL $12,517 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. Packet Page 380 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Edmonds Marsh/Willow Creek Daylighting ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $200,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Using strategies and recommendations identified in the comprehensive management plan, protect site from adjacent development and storm water impacts. Continue to support day-lighting of Willow Creek to Puget Sound. Sidewalk / pathway repairs and continuation of walkway / viewing path to the hatchery if environmentally feasible. Work with Friends of the Edmonds Marsh, People for Puget Sound and others in the rejuvenation and management of the marsh. This also includes planning for the outfall of Willow Creek into Marina Beach Park. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Edmonds Marsh is a unique urban salt and fresh water marsh with abundant habitat / wildlife species. It is a designated and protected bird sanctuary. Protection is vital. Co-fund the completion of a master plan using Storm Water Utility funds as defined in the comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. As well as grant funds available through various agencies and foundations. SCHEDULE: 2014-2020 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Planning/Study Engineering & Administration Construction $200,000 1% for Art TOTAL $200,000 * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. Packet Page 381 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Public Market (Downtown Waterfront) ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: Unknown * all or part of this project may qualify for 1% for the Arts. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Work with community partners to establish a public market, year around, on the downtown waterfront area. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The project will help to create a community gathering area, boost economic development, bring tourists to town, and will be a valuable asset to Edmonds. SCHEDULE: This project depends on the ability to secure grant funding, and community partners willing to work with the city to establish this. This potentially can be accomplished by 2017. COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-2025 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. Construction 1% for Art TOTAL Packet Page 382 of 433 PROJECT NAME: Veteran’s Plaza ESTIMATED PROJECT COST: $10,000 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The establishment of a Veteran’s Plaza was unanimously approved by the City Council in 2014. It will serve as a tribute to the patriotic and courageous men and women who served this nation. The Plaza will reflect the bravery, sacrifice and strength they gave our country. The design will accommodate flagpoles (in their existing location), space for display of military seals and a Plaza, seating areas for reflection, some educational monuments or placards, and existing hardscape and significant trees. The address is 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 and is adjacent to the Edmonds Public Safety Building. PROJECT BENEFIT/ RATIONALE: The Veteran’s Plaza will serve as a focal point which raises awareness of the contributions made by veterans and illustrates the high respect the citizens of Edmonds have for the men and women who have defended the rights and freedoms of this nation. It will provide a tribute for the men and women who have served and are serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. The Plaza will establish a central site for the citizens of Edmonds to conduct official observances, activities and ceremonies to honor veterans including Veterans Day. SCHEDULE: 2015-2021 COST BREAKDOWN PROJECT COST 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Planning/Study Eng. & Admin. 10,000 Construction 1% for Art TOTAL 10,000 * all or part of this Project may qualify for 1% for the Arts Packet Page 383 of 433 FUND PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION 112 220th St. SW Overlay from 76th Ave to 84th Ave.2" pavement grind and overlay with ADA curb ramp upgrades 112 Hwy. 99 @ 216th St. SW Intersection Improvements X Widen 216th St. SW to add a WB and EB left turn lane. Provide protective / permissive left turn phasing for both movements. 112 Re-striping of 76th Ave. W from 220th to OVD Re-striping of 76th with addition of bike lanes on both sides of the street 112 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W X Installation of 150' of sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW. 112 Trackside Warning System / Quiet Zone (Dayton and Main RR crossings)X Installation of trackside warning system or Quiet Zone system at (2) railroad crossings (Main St. and Dayton St.) 116 Anderson Center Roofing Project Subject of a DP for 2015 funding 116 Anderson Center Accessibility CDBG Grant application coming in 2014 for wheelchair lift. 116 City Hall Security Measures Subject of a DP for 2015 funding. 116 Grandstand Exterior and Roof Repairs If deemed necessary per on-going investigation. 125 Sunset Avenue Walkway X Alignment with Fund 112 CIP. 125 Fishing Pier Rehab In partnership with WDFW, contingent upon grant funds. 125 Pavement Preservation Program 125 REET Parks and 125 REET Transportation combined into one spreadsheet titled 125 Capital Projects Fund. Added transfer to the 112 Street Fund. 125 Meadowdale Playfields Intalling turf fields, in partnership with Lynnwood and Edmonds School District, and contingent upon grant funds. 132 Civic Center Acquisitoin X Purchase of Civic Center from the School District 421 2021 Replacement Program Estimated future costs for waterline replacements. 421 2015 Waterline Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements. 422 105th/106 Ave SW Drianage Improvements This project was in 2012-2017 CIP but removed the following year. Advanced maintenance by the Public Worls Crews worked for a few years, but now the system needs to be replaced. 423 2021 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Imprvmnts Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements/rehab/impr. 423 2015 Sewerline Overlays Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewerline repl/rehab/impr. 423 Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study Estimated cost for Study to determine how to replace/rehab/improve trunk sewerline located directly west of Lake Ballinger. Preliminary costs for this project will be generated under this task. CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2014 TO 2015) ADDED PROJECTS Packet Page 384 of 433 FUND PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION 112 Type 2 Raised Pavement Markers Project removed from list to accommodate higher priorities. 112 Main St. from 5th to 6th X Completed in 2013. 112 School zone flashing beacons Completed in 2013. 116 Anderson Center Countertop Replacement Delayed until 2016. 116 Anderson Center Radiator Replacement Delayed until 2017. 116 City Hall Exterior Cleaning/Repainting Delayed another year. 116 Meadowdale Clubhouse Roof Delayed another year. 116 Cemetery Building Gutter Replacement Delayed another year. 125 Haines Wharf Park & Walkway Project Completed in 2013. 421 2011 Replacement Program Completed in 2013. 421 2012 Replacement Program Completed in 2013. 421 2012 Waterline Overlays Completed in 2013. 421 224th Waterline Replacement Completed in 2013. 422 Southwest Edmonds Basin Study Project 2 - Connect Sumps near Robin Hood Lane X Project not needed at this point due to upstream improvements by Public Works Crews. 422 Goodhope Pond Basin Study/Projects New system with detention installed as part of 5 Corners Roundabout project. Future need for this project will be assessed. 423 Meter Installations Basin Edmonds Zone Deleted. Discussions with operations and engineering staff were done to prioritize metering needs. It was determined that the metering in the Lift Station 1 zone and the Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study are more pressing in their need to be completed. 423 Smoke Test in Basin Edmonds Zone Deleted. Discussions with operations and engineering staff were done to prioritize smoke testing. It was determined that the Lift Station 1 study and the Lake Ballinger Trunk Sewer Study are more pressing in their need to be completed. CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2014 TO 2015) DELETED PROJECTS Packet Page 385 of 433 FUND PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE 112 Citywide - Signal Improvements Combined w/ Citywide Safety Impr.- Signal Cabinet / Ped. Countdown Displ. 112 Citywide Bicycle Connections Combined with Bicycle Route Signing 116 ESCO IV To be done in 2015. No streetlights. FAC steam system component. 421 Five Corners 3.0 MG Reservoir Recoating Project merged into one project called Five Corners Reservoir Recoating. 421 Five Corners 1.5 MG Reservoir Recoating Project merged into one project called Five Corners Reservoir Recoating. 422 Storm Drainage Improvement Project: Dayton St. Between 6th & 8th Now called: Dayton St. between 3rd & 9th. More extensive improvements are needed to reduce the frequency of flooding. 422 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects X Removed from CFP. Culvert/Bridge projects constructed by City of Mountlake Terrace. No additional capital projects currently planned. Project will remain in the CIP to work with neighboring jursidictions on policy and other issues. 423 2012 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Impr Renamed to Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer Replacement 423 2013 Sewer Replacement/Rehab/Impr Renamed to Phase 2 Sanitary Sewer Replacement 423 Meter Installation Basin LS-01 Project merged into one project called Lift Station 1 metering and flow study 423 Smoke Test Basin LS-01 Project merged into one project called Lift Station 1 metering and flow study CHANGED PROJECTS CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2014 TO 2015) Packet Page 386 of 433 423.76 Repair and Replacement Repairs to the Pagoda, Secondary Clarifier #3 and coating projects will be focussed on in late 2014 anf early 2015. 423.76 Upgrades Offsite Flow Telemetry: This project will modify the offsite monitoring stations to solar power in an effort to significantly lower our energy bills. One station was completed in 2014, the remaininig station will be completed in 2015. Control System Upgrade: Replace aging control system equipment, provide for redundancy and upgrade the operating platform. In 2014 PLC 100 will be replaced. In 2015 PLC 500 and PLC 300 will be replaced. This project will be completed in 2016. SSI rpoject: In late 2014 we will purchaes the mercury absortion modules and install them late 2015 or early 2016. Phase 4 energy improvements: in late 2014 we will replace the plant air compressors and in 2015 we will retrofit A basin 2 with fine bubble diffusers and install a new blower. 423.76 Studies and Consulting We will continue to evaluate UV vs. Hypo for disinfection, begin the design for solids sytem enhancements and look at gasification as a future alternative to the SSI. Much of this work will be accomplished under the ESCO model and focuss on energy improvements. Packet Page 387 of 433 DRAFT Subject to October 8th Approval CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES September 24, 2014 Chair Cloutier called the meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Safety Complex, 250 – 5th Avenue North. BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT Todd Cloutier, Chair Neil Tibbott, Vice Chair Philip Lovell Daniel Robles Careen Rubenkonig Valerie Stewart BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Bill Ellis (excused) STAFF PRESENT Shane Holt, Development Services Director Rob Chave, Planning Division Manager Rob English, City Engineer Carrie Hite, Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Director Karin Noyes, Recorder READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES VICE CHAIR TIBBOTT MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 10, 2014 BE APPROVED AS AMENDED. CHAIR CLOUTIER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA The agenda was accepted as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS No one in the audience indicated a desire to address the Board during this portion of the meeting. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT TO PLANNING BOARD Ms. Hope referred the Board to the written Director’s Report. In addition to the items outlined on the report, she announced that the public has invited to a free program that asks the question, “What Does a Vibrant City of the Future Look Like?” The event is being sponsored by Community Transit, Puget Sound Regional Council, and 8-80 Cities and will take place on September 25th at the Lynnwood Convention Center starting at 6:30 p.m. Gil Penalosa, Executive Director of the Canadian non-profit organization 8-80 Cities will speak about how to create vibrant cities and healthy communities for everyone. She encouraged Board Member to attend. Board Member Lovell requested a status report on the Shoreline Master Program (SMP). He recalled that the Council is currently considering a modification to the Board’s recommendation that would increase the setback area for development to 150 feet and the buffer area to 50 feet. Ms. Hope emphasized that the City Council has not taken final action on the SMP yet, but the majority appear to be leaning towards a greater setback. Board Member Lovell advised that the Port of Edmonds has Packet Page 388 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 2 gone on record in opposition to the increased setback and indicated they would likely take legal action if the greater setbacks are adopted. Ms. Hope said staff indicated support for the 50-foot buffer, as recommended by the Planning Board and supported by Best Available Science. Board Member Stewart clarified that the City Council is proposing the increased setback requirement on a 2-year interim basis. At the end of the two years, the setback could be renegotiated. Chair Cloutier noted that the City Council is also considering significant modifications to the Board’s recommendation related to Highway 99 zoning. Ms. Hope acknowledged that the Council conducted a public hearing and voted to amend the recommendation, but they will not take formal action until a revised ordinance is presented to them at a future meeting. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (CFP) AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) (FILE NUMBER AMD20150006 Mr. English explained that the CFP and CIP are different documents and have different purposes. The CIP is used as a budgeting tool and includes both capital and maintenance projects. The CFP is mandated by the Growth Management Act and is intended to identify longer-term capital needs (not maintenance) to implement the City’s level of service standards and growth projections. The CFP must be consistent with the other elements of the Comprehensive Plan, and it can only be amended once a year. He provided a graph to illustrate how the two plans overlap. He advised that the CFP is comprised of three sections: general, transportation and stormwater. The CIP has two sections related to general and parks projects, and each project is organized by the City’s financial fund numbers. He announced that, this year, the 125 funds were combined to include both transportation and parks projects to be consistent with the City’s budget. Mr. English noted that a description of each project was included in the draft CIP. He reviewed some of the projects identified in the CIP and CFP, as well as the progress that was made over the past year as follows:  The 5 Corners Roundabout Project is nearing completion. This significant project is intended to improve the level of service (LOS) of the intersection and improve air quality by moving traffic more efficiently through the intersection.  The City Council approved a $1.6 million budget for a Street Preservation Program in 2014. This has enabled staff to overlay two streets and apply chip seal applications to three streets. Staff is proposing a budget of $1.56 million for the Street Preservation Program in 2015.  The 228th Street Corridor Improvement Project will start in 2015. As proposed, 228th Street Southwest will be extended across the unopened right-of-way to 76th Avenue West, and the intersections at Highway 99 and 76th Avenue West will be signalized. 228th Street Southwest will be overlaid from 80th Place West to 2,000 feet east of 72nd Avenue West, and 76th Avenue West will be overlaid from 228th Street Southwest to Highway 99. Chair Cloutier questioned if the proposed improvements would extend all the way to the border of Mountlake Terrace. Mr. English answered affirmatively and noted that Mountlake Terrace is also planning improvements for its portion of 228th Street Southwest.  Intersection improvements at 76th Avenue West and 212th Street Southwest are currently under design and the City is in the process of acquiring additional right-of-way. Construction is planned to start in 2016.  76th Avenue West will be restriped between 220th Street Southwest and Olympic View Drive. The section that is currently four lanes will be reduced to three lanes, with a bike lane. Pre-design work for this project will start in 2015, with construction in 2016.  Design money has been identified to start the process of looking at the potential of creating a quiet zone or a trackside warning system at the Dayton and Main Street railroad crossings. A consultant contract was recently approved, and a kick-off meeting is scheduled for next week.  The Sunset Avenue Walkway Project has received a lot of discussion at the Council level in recent months. The Council recently approved a temporary alignment for the walkway as a trail and these improvements will likely be finished within the next week or two. Packet Page 389 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 3  A sidewalk will be installed on 15th Street between SR-104 and 8th Avenue utilizing grant funding from the Safe Routes To School Program. The project should be completed by November of 2014.  Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) curb ramps will be installed on 3rd Avenue, and the project will be advertised this week.  A sidewalk will be installed on the north side of 238th Street Southwest from 100th Avenue West to 104th Avenue West. Stormwater improvements will also be included with this project, which will be funded via a Safe Routes To School Grant and Utilities Fund 422.  A walkway will be constructed on the south side of 236th Street Southwest from SR-104 to Madrona Elementary School. Sharrows will also be added along this stretch. This project is also being funded through the Safe Routes to School Program.  10,000 feet of water main was replaced in 2014, and two pressure reducing valves were replaced. The City just completed 2,000 feet of street overlay where water mains were previously replaced. In 2015, they plan to replace 7,000 feet of water main, as well as some pressure reducing valves.  The 4th Avenue Stormwater Project is in progress and is intended to address flooding issues in the downtown caused by heavy rains. This project should be completed within the next month.  The vactor waste handling facility was completed this year, and they are working to replace the filtration pipes.  The City will build on the study completed in 2013 that assessed the feasibility of daylighting the Willow Creek channel as part the Edmonds Marsh Project. Daylighting the creek will help reverse the negative impacts to Willow Creek and the Edmond Marsh that occurred when Willow Creek was piped.  A lift station and other new infrastructure will be installed at Dayton Street and SR-104 to improve drainage and reduce flooding at the intersection.  A flow reduction study has been completed for the Perrinville Creek High Flow Reduction/Management Project, and the project is currently at the pre-design phase.  Sewer main on Railroad Avenue was replaced in July, and more work is scheduled in 2015. By the end of 2014, the City will have replaced over 6,000 feet of sewer main in several locations. In 2015, staff is proposing 1,500 feet of cured-in- place pipe application, 4,000 feet of sewer main replacement, and improvements at the Wastewater Treatment Plan. Board Member Lovell noted that Meadowdale Beach Road is in poor condition, and it does not make sense to install a sidewalk before the roadway has been repaved. Mr. English pointed out that repaving Meadowdale Beach Road is identified as a project in the Roadway Preservation Program. If funding is available, it will move forward in 2015. He cautioned that the street may need more than an overlay to address the problems. Vice Chair Tibbott asked Mr. English to describe the differences between the cured-in-place pipe application and replacing sewer mains. Mr. English said that the cured-in-place application is a trenchless technology that the City has used on a few projects in the last several years. If a pipeline is cracked but has not lost its grade, you can apply a new interior coating. This can be done by accessing the manholes within the pipe without having to excavate or cut the street. Staff has spent a significant amount of time this year collecting data on the existing condition of the pipes to identify those in which the cured- in-place option would be appropriate. Vice Chair Tibbott asked if the cured-in-place application would address root problems. Mr. English answered that the application is a good way to take care of roots. Depending on the age of the pipes, they are most likely to connect at the joints, which provide a pathway for roots. The cured-in-place application would be a continuous inner lining for the pipe so the potential for roots to find gaps or cracks goes away once it is installed. Packet Page 390 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 4 Vice Chair Tibbott asked Mr. English to describe how the Dayton Street Lift Station would work. Mr. English explained that there are a lot of different inputs into the stormwater issues in this location such as the Edmonds Marsh, Shellebarger Creek, and stormwater runoff. In this particular case, when the tide elevation is high, the water cannot drain into the Sound and flooding occurs at the intersection of Dayton Street and SR-104. The marsh does not drain as well, either. The proposed project will re-establish the flow through the marsh, and install a lift station that will mechanically lift the water during high tide so it can be discharged to Puget Sound. Board Member Stewart referred to the Sunset Avenue Walkway Project and asked about the definition for “multi-use pathways.” Mr. English answered that there is not really a definition for multi-use pathways. The concept is based more on width. Ten feet is the standard width for a multi-use pathway, but some are as narrow as 8 feet or as wide as 12 feet. The goal is to have walkers and bikers use the route together. Board Member Stewart asked if it would be possible to allow some wheeled access on the pathway, while bikes are routed to the sharrows on the roadway. Mr. English agreed that would be possible. He noted that while the sharrows for north bound bikers are not in place, bikers going south can use the trail that is striped. Board Member Stewart asked if the City would consider green infrastructure as a method of stormwater improvement such as rain gardens, bioswales, and pervious pavement. Mr. English said they are considering a few green options for stormwater. For example, the Shellebarger Creek High Flow Reduction Study recommends building bio-retention facilities within the residential areas. These projects are about 90% designed, and the City plans to apply for grants to build them in 2015. There is also an infiltration facility at Sea View Park to take some of the high flow off Perrinville Creek. Two previously mentioned projects utilize infiltration methods versus collection and putting the water into the Sound. Board Member Stewart suggested that these efforts should be noted in the plans. Board Member Rubenkonig said she enjoyed the project descriptions. She particularly found the history to be helpful in understanding how each project originated. She would also like each project description to reference the plan that supports it and explained why it was proposed. She noted that some of the descriptions provide details about the size of the projects (i.e. length, square footage, acreage, etc.) She found this helpful to make a connection between a project’s size and its anticipated cost. She suggested that this information should be provided for each of the project descriptions. Mr. English agreed that more information could be provided in the project descriptions related to size, but the City does not yet have this detailed information for some of the projects in the CIP. Board Member Rubenkonig pointed out that walkway projects are referred to as both sidewalks and walkways. She asked if there is a reason to make this distinction. Mr. English agreed that the terms could be more consistent. The City secured grant funding for three sidewalk projects from the Safe Routes to School Program. His guess is that throughout the application process, the projects were probably identified as walkways as opposed to sidewalks. Ms. Hite advised that approximately $120,000 is set aside each year in the CIP for park maintenance items. She explained that although it is not common for cities to use Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) funds strictly for parks operations and maintenance, the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) allows it. However, this provision will sunset at the end of 2016. Unless it is extended for an additional time period, the City will have to be creative in 2017 to fill the funding gap. Ms. Hite provided a brief overview of the accomplishments in 2014 related to parks, as well as projects anticipated for 2015:  A new play area was installed at City Park. However, because of issues with drainage and the existing water table, the spray pad had to be redesigned. Permits for the project were submitted earlier in the week, and the goal is to obtain the permits and get the project out to bid before the end of the year so construction can start in February or March. It is anticipated the spray pad will open by Memorial Day 2015. She briefly described some of the features of the new play area and spray pad.  The Dayton Street Plaza Project has been on the City’s plan for the past few years, and demolition work started this month. She provided a schematic design of the project for the Board’s information.  Some historic preservation plaques were installed on the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor, as well as other locations throughout the downtown. In addition, the Arts Commission has been working on a temporary installation on 4th Packet Page 391 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 5 Avenue to bring visibility to the corridor. They are holding public meetings regarding the project at this time. However, the City does not currently have funding to create permanent features along the corridor.  The City has set aside $655,000 in the CIP and the School District has agreed to contribute $500,000 for redevelopment of the Woodway High School Athletic Field. In 2013, the City received a $750,000 state appropriation from local representatives, as well as a capital grant of $2.5 million from Verdant Health Care. They now have a total of $4.2 million for the project. In addition to a sports field for soccer, softball, lacrosse and ultimate Frisbee, the play area will be upgraded and a new walking path will be provided to connect to the oval track around the football field. The project is currently in the design phase. The district will construct the project and the City will maintain it and have operational control of the fields. The redeveloped facility is set to open in September of 2015.  The Yost Pool boiler was replaced in 2014. In addition, new plaster was applied to the bottom of the pool, and a new hot water tank was installed. They just recently discovered that the spa has a leak that will cost about $100,000 to fix, and this money was built into the 2015 budget.  The Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services Department is working in partnership with the Stormwater Division on the Marina Beach Master Plan, which will include daylighting of Willow Creek. Burlington Northern Santa Fe installed a culvert that can be used for this purpose, and they are currently considering two different alignment options, both of which will have impacts to Marina Beach Park and/or the dog park. Staff will work with the design team and the public to come up with the best solution, and they are hoping the work can be completed by next September.  The Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan and Community Cultural Plan were updated this year.  The Anderson Field Amphitheater and Meadowdale Club House Playfield will be replaced in 2015.  The City is working in partnership with the City of Lynnwood and the Edmonds School District to further develop and maintain the Meadowdale Playfields. They are looking at installing turf on the fields so they can be used year round. The School District has allotted $1 million for the project, and the Cities of Edmonds and Lynnwood have agreed to contribute, as well. They have applied for a grant to help fund the project, and they are hoping to have enough money put together to start within the next three years.  The City has an aggressive goal to acquire waterfront property and has set aside about $900,000 from a Conservations Future Grant and REET dollars for this purpose. The City has been negotiating with a property owner, and she is optimistic that an agreement can be reached.  Rehabilitation of the Fishing Pier has been on the City’s radar since 2009. The facility is located on property owned by the Port of Edmonds, but the facility is owned by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WSDFW). The City maintains the facility. While the pier looks nice on the outside and is safe, it was constructed 35 years ago and the salt water environment has caused significant deterioration. WSDFW has offered to give the pier to the City, but the City would like the rehabilitation work to be completed before ownership is transferred. The City is working in partnership with the WSDFW to obtain the needed funds, which is estimated to cost about $1.5 million. About $200,000 has been allocated to the project, and the WSDFW has submitted a grant request to the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) for $1.3 million. The grant scored well, and they are hoping it will be funded so the project can move forward in 2015.  The City has been working with the Edmonds School District to acquire the Civic Center Playfield. An appraiser was hired to come up with an appraisal that is acceptable to both parties, and third-party appraiser was also hired to confirm the findings. The City submitted a grant request for $1 million to the RCO, and the project scored within the range of projects that were funded last year. However, if there are cuts in the RCO’s budget, the grant may not be funded. If the City is able to complete the acquisition in 2015, some money will be set aside in 2016 to do a master plan. Packet Page 392 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 6 Board Member Lovell asked if the City would continue to maintain the Civic Center Playfield in its current state until such time as it is acquired and redeveloped. Ms. Hite answered that short-term goal is to acquire the property and maintain it as is until a master plan has been completed and the park is redeveloped. Board Member Lovell asked if the senior center was identified on the CFP as a placeholder or if the City will dedicate funding for the project. Ms. Hite said this project will require a partnership with other entities. The City will support the project as much as possible, but it will not be a City project. Vice Chair Tibbott asked if the City will partner with the Edmonds School District to redevelop the Civic Center Playfield. Ms. Hite answered that the City is now pursuing a complete acquisition of the site. The district has indicated it does not have a developer. Ms. Hite agreed that is possible, but the current lease, which runs through 2020, gives the City the first right to purchase. Vice Chair Tibbott asked if the new sports field at the Old Woodway High School would be turf. Ms. Hite answered affirmatively. She explained that this is something that is desperately needed in the area. Because the City does not have any turf fields at this time, the season is limited to just over four months each year. The City will continue to maintain its grass fields, but having an amenity that allows year-round play is important to the parks system. Vice Chair Tibbott noted that some parks in the City are underutilized. When it comes to thinking of bigger projects like an aquatics center or acquiring property, he asked if the City has considered selling some of the underutilized park land to provide funding for new parks and/or needed improvements. Ms. Hite answered that the City currently has a good balance of neighborhood, community and regional parks, and there are still some deficiencies near Highway 99. They have not considered the option of selling park land because they do not feel there are surplus parks in the system. All of the parks are utilized, and even those that just provide green space are desirable to the community. Board Member Robles referred to Ms. Hite’s report that the City obtained the services of a third-party appraiser to study the Civic Center Playfield. He asked if the City also uses third-party consultants to conduct condition assessments and feasibility studies or is the work done in house. Ms. Hite answered that this work is contracted out, and the various grant guidelines have very rigid rules for assessments and appraisals for parkland acquisition. Board Member Stewart noted that rest room repairs are identified for Brackett’s Landing. She asked if the City has considered turning the restrooms over to a concessionaire. Ms. Hite said the City has a program for encouraging concessionaires in parks, but none have located at Brackett’s Landing to date. Every January, the City sends out a Request for Proposals, inviting vendors who might want to operate a concession stand in a City-owned park. In total, concessions brought in $10,000 last year to help with parks. She expressed her belief that the program is a win-win. It provides additional amenities in parks, as well as funds for park improvements. Board Member Stewart asked if the City has considered meters in parking areas that serve City parks. Ms. Hite said this option has been discussed, but it has not received a lot of support from the City Council. If the Board is interested in pursuing the option, she can facilitate the discussion. Board Member Stewart noted that the project description for the Sunset Walkway Project indicates that a sidewalk will be provided on the west side. She asked if this is the same project identified in the CFP. Ms. Hite answered affirmatively, noting that the $200,000 identified for the project in 2018 will come from the Parks Fund. However, most of the funding for the project will come from grants and the City’s street improvement fund. Board Member Stewart referred to the Fishing Pier and Restroom Project and noted that no funding has been set aside for the Beach Ranger Station, which is old and very small. Ms. Hite agreed that there has been no discussion about replacing the station, and it was not included as a project in the PROS Plan. However, staff could explore this option further as directed by the Board. Board Member Stewart referred to Page 48 of the draft CIP, which talks about Miscelleneous Unpaved Trail/Bike Path Improvements. He asked if the City’s website provides a map showing where the bike paths are located within parks. Ms. Packet Page 393 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 7 Hite said there are not a lot of bicycle trails through parks, but the City’s goal is to provide exterior connections. These are not currently listed on the City’s website, but they could be added. Board Member Stewart observed that, although the draft CIP identifies $1.4 million for waterfront acquisition, the allocations would be spread out over a seven year period. She suggested the City look for opportunities to partner with non-profits and apply for grants to obtain additional funding. When land becomes available, the City must move quickly. Developers have ready cash and the City doesn’t, and that can result in missed opportunities. Ms. Hite agreed that the City needs to create new funding sources so they are ready to move forward when opportunities come up. The goal is to continue to add money to the fund each year, but there are also competing priorities for the available park dollars. She emphasized that waterfront acquisition is identified as a high priority in the PROS Plan, and maintaining a separate fund for this purpose should also be a priority. Once again, Board Member Rubenkonig asked that each project description reference the plan/plans that support it and explain why it was proposed. This allows the community to have a clear understanding of why the project is identified as a priority for funding. She also asked that the descriptions provide details about the size of the project. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if the 4th Avenue arts walk, which starts at Main Street, extends all the way to 3rd Avenue. Ms. Hite answered that it ends at the Performing Arts Center. Ms. Hite said that in addition to the projects identified in the CFP, members of the Economic Development Commission have requested that the City study the option of installing a restroom in the downtown area. She suggested that the concept could be identified in the CFP as a potential project for the City Council’s future consideration. She acknowledged that there is no money available for a restroom right now, but including it on the CFP allows the City to explore funding opportunities. She noted that the community has also indicated support for a public restroom in the downtown. The Board indicated support for the concept, as well. Mr. English reviewed the schedule for moving the CIP and CFP forward to the City Council for final review and approval. He noted that the plans were introduced to the City Council on September 23rd. Both documents, along with the Board’s recommendation, will be presented to the City Council for a study session on October 14th. From that point, the City Council will conduct a public hearing and take final action. Once approved, the CFP will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. English thanked the Board for providing comments. The documents are large and he appreciates the Board’s thorough review and thoughtful comments. Board Member Rubenkonig pointed out that impact fees were not identified in either plan as a potential funding source for transportation and walkway improvements. Mr. English said this revenue stream is identified in the CIP under Fund 112. He explained that the City has both transportation and park impact fee programs, and funds are collected when development occurs within the City. However, it is important to understand that the money can only be used for certain projects. For example, transportation impact fee dollars can only be used to address concurrency or LOS. Board Member Rubenkonig asked if some of the funding for the 5 Corners Roundabout Project will be used to study how well the roundabout is working to determine if it meets its LOS expectation. Mr. English explained that projects of this magnitude that are funded with federal dollars take quite some time to close out. The money identified in 2015 will be used for this purpose. Chair Cloutier opened the public hearing. As there was no one in the audience, the hearing was closed. BOARD MEMBER LOVELL MOVED THAT THE BOARD FORWARD THE 2015 – 2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND SUBSEQUENT ADOPTION, AS WRITTEN, WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THE CITY COUNCIL TAKE UP THE MATTER OF A POTENTIAL PUBLIC RESTROOM IN THE DOWNTOWN. VICE CHAIR TIBBOTT SECONDED THE MOTION. Packet Page 394 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 8 Board Member Rubenkonig said she supports the motion, but questioned if it would be appropriate to also include the changes she requested earlier regarding the project descriptions. Mr. English indicated that staff would add additional information to the project descriptions wherever possible, recognizing that some of the details are not yet available. The Board agreed that the issue did not need to be addressed in the motion. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE Ms. Hope said the purpose of tonight’s discussion is to talk more about the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update, and specifically the Housing Element. She recalled that, at the Board’s last meeting, staff reported that the City is partnering with other cities and Snohomish County in the Alliance for Housing Affordability (AHA), a group formed from Snohomish County Tomorrow. Through this effort, an affordable housing profile has been created for each of the participating jurisdictions. She introduced Kristina Gallant, Analyst, Alliance for Housing Affordability, who was present to walk the Board through the findings of the Edmonds’ Affordable Housing Profile. Kristina Gallant, Analyst, Alliance for Housing Affordability, provided a brief overview of the AHA, which consists of 13 cities in Snohomish County, Snohomish County, and the Housing Authority of Snohomish County. She reminded the Board that there is a Growth Management Act (GMA) mandate for cities to plan for housing to accommodate all segments of the population. The purpose of the AHA is to allow participating cities to share resources and get the help they need in a cost- effective way. The AHA was formed in November of 2013, and since that time she has been working to assess existing conditions and prepare profiles for each of the participating cities. Ms. Gallant explained that, when talking about affordable housing, people typically think about heavily subsidized housing, which is an important element, but not everything. If housing is affordable, but not appropriate for the community, it does not work. It is important to address the different needs and preferences of each community such as adequacy of safety, proximity to transportation, jobs, and affordability. Ms. Gallant provided an overview of the Edmonds Housing Profile, particularly emphasizing the following key elements:  There are currently 39,950 residents living in the City, and Edmonds is projected to accommodate nearly 5,000 new residents by 2035. This is a dramatic change over the stable population levels the City has seen over the past 20 years. The increase would require 2,790 additional housing units, which is near the City’s estimated capacity of 2,646 units.  The 2012 population includes 17,396 households with an average household size of 2.3 people compared to 2.6 for the County. The average family size in Edmonds is 2.8 compared to 3.12 for the County.  Housing in Edmonds is mostly comprised of single-family homes, but most growth will need to be accommodated in multi-family development. About 31% of Edmonds residents and 33% of County residents currently live in rented homes, and the proportion of homeowners remained relatively constant between 2000 and 2010, increasing slightly from 68% to 69%. About 36% of Edmonds population lives in multi-family homes compared with 31% across the County.  The City’s median income ($73,072) is relative high compared to other cities in the region, and home values are general higher, as well.  A significant number of the homes in Edmonds were built between 1950 and 1959 compared to the County overall.  Currently, 38% of Edmonds households are estimated to be cost burdened, which means they spend more than 30% of their monthly income on rent or home ownership costs.  According to 2013 Dupre and Scott data, Edmonds rental housing market is generally affordable to households earning at least 80% Average Median Income (AMI). Households earning between 50% and 80% AMI will find the majority of homes smaller than five bedrooms affordable, as well.  A limited supply of small units is affordable to those earning between 30 and 50% AMI, but market rents are not affordable to extremely low-income households. Packet Page 395 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 9  A lack of affordable rental housing for extremely low and very low-income households is very common. Some kind of financial assistance is typically required in order to operate a property and keep rents low enough in today’s housing market.  Assistance can be ongoing to make up the difference between 30% of tenants’ income and market rents. Other options include capital funding that reduces the overall project costs (considered workforce housing), making it possible to keep rent levels down.  Edmonds currently has 303 units of subsidized housing with a range of rental assistance sources. It also has 201 units of workforce housing distributed across three properties. These units received some form of one-time subsidy (i.e. low-income tax credit, grants, etc.) in exchange for rent restrictions, but they do not involve rental assistance and rents are not tailored to individual household incomes. In addition, the City has 16 units of transitional housing. However, with 5,322 households earning less than 50% AMI, there is still a need to increase the supply.  In 2012, the median sale price for a single-family home in Edmonds was $339,975. This would require an annual income of at least $75,796, which is just above the City’s median income ($73,072).  Affordability for 2013 cannot be calculated at this time, but average assessed values suggest that home prices are rising as the housing market continues to recover following the recession, and affordability is retreating.  Edmonds has the third highest average assessed 2014 home values in Snohomish County ($351,100), which represents a 10.7% increase over 2013.  Edmonds has one of the highest percentages of elderly residents among Snohomish County cities; 25% of the households have individuals 65 years or older. In addition to having generally lower incomes, seniors will require different types of housing and services if they desire to age in place. Ms. Gallant advised that the City has already taken a number of steps to promote affordable housing, and there is a range of options it can consider to respond to the continuing needs of the community. In addition to promoting, adjusting and providing incentives for housing policies where appropriate, the City should continue to monitor and evaluate its policies to make sure there are no unnecessary regulatory barriers to affordable housing. The Housing Profile is meant to be a resource for the City as it moves through its Comprehensive Plan update. The AHA’s goal is to continue to work with participating cities from a technical advisory standpoint, researching what is needed to help establish goals for housing, identifying potential methods for implementation, and identifying funding sources that are available to support infrastructure related to housing. Board Member Robles asked what can be done to promote house-sharing opportunities in Edmonds. He suggested that this opportunity is not always about making money; it is about people trying to hang on to their homes. Ms. Gallant replied that many cities have ordinances in place that allow accessory dwelling units, but they vary significantly. It is important for cities to review their provisions for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) to make sure they are easy to understand and that the requirements and processes are not so onerous as to be cost prohibitive. The AHA’s goal is to work with participating cities to develop better policies and make sure there are no unnecessary barriers. At the same time, they must be cognizant to balance the new policies with the other needs of the City. Board Member Rubenkonig pointed out that ADUs were not addressed in the AHA’s report. Ms. Gallant agreed that data related to accessory dwelling units was not included in her report, and she would definitely like to research this opportunity more. Board Member Stewart complimented Ms. Gallant for a great report and a good start for metrics. However, she agreed with Board Member Rubenkonig that, at some point, the City must include ADUs in the metrics. She also suggested the City consider expanding its ADU provisions as a type of housing option to help the City meet its growth targets. She expressed concern that the numbers provided in the report is based on the number of bedrooms and size is not factored into the variables. Ms. Gallant agreed that the data is not as detailed as it could be, but it is intended to start the conversation. Vice Chair Tibbott asked if the AHA has studied whether or not it is less costly to develop high-density residential versus low-density residential units. He said it would be helpful to have information about the average cost of producing the various types of affordable housing compared to the outcome. Ms. Gallant said she would like to study per unit development costs at some point in the future. In general, the housing costs are reflected through the rent and home sales, and there is a lot of debate about whether high density produces more affordable units. Increasing the supply over the long term is what needs to happen. When there is a choke point in the supply, housing prices will rise. Packet Page 396 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 10 Vice Chair Tibbott recalled the Board’s previous discussion point to the fact that just building small units does not mean they will be affordable. He noted that using lower cost finishes is one approach that can reduce the cost of the units, but he questioned if it would be possible to produce enough of these units in Edmonds to make a difference. He asked if any thought has been given to lowering development costs or allowing different types of development so developers can produce more affordable units. For example, the City could consider reduced permit fees or tax incentives. Ms. Gallant said the AHA is interested in researching this issue. Ms. Hope explained that the next step is for staff to review the current Housing Element and come back to the Board with a revised version that incorporates the new information contained in the Housing Profile and other census data. She explained that one aspect of updating each Comprehensive Plan element is to identify a performance measure that will be meaningful, yet easy for the City to replicate with data annually. In addition, an action (implementation) step may be identified to help achieve progress on certain issues. Staff is recommending that the performance measure for the Housing Element be a set number of residential units permitted each year. The exact number could be filled in later in the year when data is ready. This information would enable the City track its progress in allowing housing that will accommodate expected growth. Staff is also proposing that the action item for the Housing Element be to develop a strategy by 2019 for increasing the supply of affordable housing and meeting diverse housing needs. She explained that there are many different ways to address affordability and several tools can be utilized to encourage affordable housing while looking at the overall housing needs. The proposed performance measure can get at the overall supply of housing units in Edmonds, but it is more difficult to measure affordability. Chair Cloutier expressed his belief that counting the number of bedrooms is the appropriate approach since the goal is to provide “beds for the heads.” The City could easily collect data for this metric. However, the affordability aspect is more market driven than the City can control and it would be very difficult to measure. Board Member Robles suggested that one option would be to offer a micro-tax incentive to encourage developers to report correctly. Board Member Rubenkonig observed that the Growth Management Act deals with affordable housing as more population based. However, population translates into housing, and that is why it is a good proxy for population. You have to have housing for people to live in. The Growth Management does not define affordable housing, and it does not provide specific policies on how to encourage more affordable housing. Board Member Robles asked if the City can track ADUs. Ms. Hope answered affirmatively, as long as they have a valid permit. However, it would be very difficult to track rooms for rent. Board Member Stewart asked if a three-bedroom unit would be considered three units. Ms. Hope answered that it would only count as one unit. Board Member Stewart pointed out that household size has decreased in Edmonds in recent years, but the size of the units has increased. Board Member Lovell recalled that the City has fairly stringent building restrictions with respect to ADUs. If they are serious about meeting the Growth Management Act (GMA) targets and accommodating an increased population, this issue will have to be addressed. He noted that the Board has been talking about the growth targets and opportunities for affordable housing for a number of years, but the City Council has a history of not taking action to accommodate mixed-use development with higher densities. While it is fine for the Board to discuss the issue again and put forth plans, he is not convinced anything will change in the near future unless the makeup of the City Council changes dramatically. Mr. Chave clarified that ADUs are not considered multi-family apartments or second dwellings. The definition remains single-family. Extended family members and/or parents could live in a permitted ADU, as long as all the occupants in both units are related. It gets more complicated when unrelated people live in the units. The definition of "family" says that up to five unrelated people can live on a single-family property. For example, a family of four could rent to a single person or a family of three could rent to two people. In addition, ADUs must be attached to the main unit, and there are size limitations. There has been a steady uptick of ADUs in the City, particularly involving large, older homes. He noted that no permit would be required to rent a room to someone. The key distinction is whether or not there are separate living units. Packet Page 397 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 11 Ms. Hope added that the City has made the choice not to count ADUs as separate housing units. She suggested this is a lesser issue compared to the policies that guide the use. Mr. Chave explained that if ADUs are counted as separate units, requirements such as impact fees would come into plan. Chair Cloutier suggested that ADUs could be counted differently for the metrics versus the code. The Board expressed general support for the proposed Housing Element performance measure and action step. However, they expressed a desire to forward with developing a strategy for increasing the supply of affordable housing and meeting diverse housing needs sooner than 2019 if resources are available. Board Member Rubenkonig said she likes the term “housing options” rather than “lower-income housing.” She wants to know that people can remain in the community of Edmonds at different stages of their lives. Although sometimes they can afford larger houses, they need smaller units. Board Member Stewart expressed concern that the older homes in Edmonds are being torn down and redeveloped into units that are three times more costly than the prior home. She would like the City to offer incentives to property owners to retain their existing homes. The City must offer a variety of housing options to serve the citizens. Ms. Hope agreed and said the issue would be addressed as part of the strategy. Board Member Lovell referred to an article in THE SEATTLE TIMES titled, “Builders Say Land in Short Supply.” This article applies directly to the Board’s current discussion. Until cities find ways to accommodate more multi-family housing, the demand will remain high in the future, and the prices will continue to increase. Right now, the City does not have a great track record for accommodating this kind of development. The City is already built out, and the only way to accommodate more people is to allow more density. PRESENTATION ON DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES Ms. Hope and Mr. Chave made a brief presentation on development projects and activities. Ms. Hope noted that the same presentation was made to the City Council on September 23rd. The purpose of the presentation is to recreate the story of everything that has happened related to development in the City over the past several years, particularly highlighting the present activity. She advised that the Development Services Department is comprised of the Engineering Division, the Building Division and the Planning Division. Its goal is to provide assistance to people interested in improving or developing their property via discussions, data, handouts, permitting and inspections. She reported that she has received number compliments on the quality of service that staff provides. While not everyone is always happy, staff tries hard to be courteous, respectful and helpful. Staff members work in different ways to serve the community. For example:  Field inspections are performed by building inspectors, engineering inspectors and planning staff. Not counting site visits, more than 6,000 inspections have been performed over the last year.  Staff members meet together in teams to coordinate on different projects and activities.  Staff also meets with applicants and developers to provide pre-application assistance for development projects that are being planned. Ms. Hope advised that the Planning Division is responsible for a number of different types of permits, including short plats, variances, and other permits related to planning and land-use codes. A number of different planning permits were approved over the past seven months. She provided a graph to illustrate the number of permits and revenue generated from January through August in 2001 through 2014. She noted that the data reflects the economic climate over the last several years. There as a big jump in development permits in 2006 through 2008, but permitting dropped off quickly after that. As the economy improves, the City is once again seeing an increase in the number of permits. Ms. Hope said the Building Division is responsible for certain types of permits, as well, some of which are reviewed by the Planning and Engineering Divisions, as well. These projects added $38,000 to the City of Edmonds in terms of values and buildings. It is anticipated that upcoming key projects will double that number in just a few months. Mr. Chave noted that Swedish Edmonds Hospital’s project was not factored into those numbers yet, and it should add $28,000 in value. Packet Page 398 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 12 Ms. Hope reported that the City issued significantly more solar panel permits in 2014 compared to 2012 and 2013, and most of those permits were applied for on line. Mr. Chave advised that the City’s Building Official has been working with other cities, including Seattle, Bellevue and Ellensburg, on a program to encourage solar installations using grant funding from the State Department of Commerce. The program has been implemented in a few cities as a pilot to figure out how to streamline and reduce the costs of solar permitting. A few incentive programs were rolled out recently in Edmonds. He summarized that it is through a combination of programs that the City is seeing a significant increase in the number of solar permits. This speaks directly to the work they have done to improve the process and provide more information. The City will continue to work hard to encourage solar in the community, and he anticipates the numbers will continue to increase. Ms. Hope reported that for the period between September 1, 2013 and August 31, 2104, the Engineering Division issued 591 engineering permits, for total permit fees of $93,285.44. They also performed 1094 inspections, for total inspection fees of $124,815.82. In addition, they completed an estimated 1,200 reviews of plans. Ms. Hope provided a map identifying the location of key development projects in Edmonds. Mr. Chave explained that the Development Services Department currently has a total of 544 active issued building permits. These building permits are typically issued early in the year and take time to progress through. There is still a tremendous amount of work to be done on most of them. Mr. Chave specifically noted the following:  There are currently 52 active new single-family residence permits. This is a significant increase, and one particularly large project is a 27-lot subdivision in the southwest part of the City that is starting to develop.  Swedish Edmonds Hospital recently completed its three-story parking garage. This was an $8.4 million project with over 108,000 square feet of space. They are currently working on an expansion that will add a 94,000 square foot, state-of-the-art facility valued at about $28 million. This project was not reflected in the numbers provided earlier.  Clearing and excavating work is currently taking place for a new mixed-use building in the downtown that will include a somewhat down-sized post office. The project will provide 94,256 square feet of space, with 43 residential units, the post office, and retail space. The project is valued at $7.2 million.  The Community Health Clinic is a new 24,750 facility that houses a medical and dental clinic. The project was completed in July of 2014 and is valued at $2.6 million.  The Salish Crossing Project will be a complete remodel of the “old Safeway site” into five new tenant spaces and a museum within the existing building. Parking lot and pedestrian improvements are also proposed as part of the project.  The Jacobsen’s Marine Project will create a new 10,120 square foot marine service building valued at $810,000 on Port of Edmonds property. This will be a big deal in terms of retail sales, as the company is a significant seller of boats and marine supplies.  Prestige Care is developing a new 48,782 square foot skilled nursing facility on 76th Avenue West. The project is valued at $6.9 million. The new building will replace the existing facility.  Excavation work is going on now for the 5th Avenue Animal Hospital, which will be a 10,562 square foot veterinary clinic that is valued at $891,000. The new building will help fill the gap between the strong retail uses on the south end of 5th Avenue and the downtown retail area.  The City is transitioning to new technology, particularly on-line permit applications and digital permit reviews. Chair Cloutier thanked Ms. Holt and Mr. Chave for the report, which he found to be enlightening and helped him understand the big projects that are occurring in the City. REVIEW OF EXTENDED AGENDA The Board did not review their extended agenda. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Cloutier thanked the Board Members for enduring a long meeting. There was a lot on their plate and the issues are important. He also thanked Vice Chair Tibbott for presenting the Planning Board’s quarterly report to the City Council. Packet Page 399 of 433 DRAFT Planning Board Minutes September 24, 2014 Page 13 PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Rubenkonig said she enjoyed being able to download the meeting packet. Mr. Chave explained that he will work with the City Clerk to learn how to in bed page numbers into the documents so they are easier for the Board to use. Board Member Stewart referred to the two links to videos that were forwarded to Board Members by Ms. Hope. The first video is general about the value of comprehensive plans and important issues to consider when updating them. The second video is called “Planning Roles and Citizen Participation.” She said she reviewed both videos, and she encouraged the other Board Members, as well as City Council Members, to do the same. She particularly recommended the second video, which shows some striking parallels to not only the Planning Board’s role, but how they interact with the City Council. Board Member Stewart reminded the Board of the tour of the marsh and Shoreline that is scheduled for October 4th from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. The tour will be led by Keeley O’Connell and a representative from the Tribes. Participants should meet in front of the Harbor Square Athletic Club. She explained that the tour is part of her citizen project called “Students Saving Salmon.” In addition to the students, members of the Planning Board, City Council and Mayor’s Climate Protection Committee are invited to attend. Vice Chair Tibbott pointed out that if the City is expected to accommodate an additional 5,000 residents before 2035, this equates to about 250 addition people per year. If this number is divided by the average household size of just over two, the number of new units needed each year is 125. This year the City added just 33 new single-family residential homes and no duplexes or multi-family units. Mr. Chave clarified that the post office project will provide an additional 43 multi-family residential units for a total of about 76 new residential units. It is likely the number will grow before the end of the year. The best report to look at will be the year-end report that captures all the projects that were completed in 2014. He suspects the final number will be about 100, which is a good year for the City. Vice Chair Tibbott provided a brief review of the quarterly report he presented to the City Council on behalf of the Board. He reported that several City Council Members said they read the Board’s comments and recommendations and they appreciated their work. One City Council Member was somewhat critical of the one meeting the Board held when there was not a quorum of members, yet they reported information that was put together that evening. He didn’t go into the details about the nature of the meeting, but the City Council Member expressed concern that it seemed like the Board was pushing forward an agenda that neither the City Council nor the City staff was ready for. Mr. Chave clarified that there was some confusion about the timeline. The City Council had actually talked about the Highway 99 stuff at their retreat before the Board met with the Highway 99 Task Force. The Board’s discussion was a follow up to the points made by the City Council. He did not feel the Board was out in front of the City Council in this situation. Board Member Lovell asked if any progress has been made to fill the vacant Planning Board position. Mr. Chave answered that Mayor Earling is in the process of interviewing four candidates. ADJOURNMENT The Board meeting was adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Packet Page 400 of 433 Date Hours Funds Purpose Materials 12‐Sep 4 3,400.00$ Fogging of Sunset/project start Engineering 13‐Sep 0 14‐Sep 0 15‐Sep 36 726.88$ swept /layout and paint materials from stock 16‐Sep 27 1,005.96$ paint/HC stalls/x‐walks materials from stock 17‐Sep 35 685.44$ install curb stops Cuz Concrete 18‐Sep 42 370.00$ prep for sidewalk pave 20yrds crush Stock 19‐Sep 7 77.78$ adjust m/h in sidewalk materials from stock 20‐Sep 0 21‐Sep 0 22‐Sep 27 148.00$ prep for sidewalk pave 8yrds crush Stock 23‐Sep 27 1,388.13$ pave walkway 18 ton Cemex 24‐Sep 18 148.00$ prep for sidewalk pave 8yrds crush Stock 25‐Sep 36 845.45$ pave walkway 11 ton Cemex 26‐Sep 6 prep curb for paint 27‐Sep 28‐Sep 0 29‐Sep 18 170.34$ paint yellow curb materials from stock 30‐Sep 0 55.50$ prep ramps 3y rock from stock 30‐Sep 27 386.32$ prep and pave ramps 5ton Cemex Sept Totals 310 9,407.80$ 1‐Oct 18 37.00$ form bench pads 2 yrds crush Stock 2‐Oct 24 261.43$ pour bench pads 2.5yrds Cemex 3‐Oct 2 break down forms 4‐Oct 0 5‐Oct 0 6‐Oct 9 70.00$ hot tape stock material 6‐Oct 0 92.85$ black paint to hide old center line Miller Paint 6‐Oct 36 3,236.52$ hot tape/spread chips Ennis Flint 7‐Oct 23 92.85$ black paint to hide old center line Miller Paint 8‐Oct 6 140.00$ pave around benches Cemex / Partial Cost 9‐Oct 0 10‐Oct 0 11‐Oct 0 12‐Oct 0 13‐Oct 0 14‐Oct 0 15‐Oct 18 spread wood chips free chips 17‐Oct 0 500.00$ fuel estimate 18‐Oct 0 19‐Oct 0 20‐Oct 0 21‐Oct 0 22‐Oct 27 3,925.58$ assist parks with plantings plants 23‐Oct 107 Parks department hours to date 24‐Oct 0 25‐Oct 0 26‐Oct 0 27‐Oct 0 28‐Oct 0 29‐Oct 0 30‐Oct 0 31‐Oct 0 Oct Totals 270 8,356.23$ Project Totals 575 17,764.03$ Sunset Walkway Public Works Cost Estimates Packet Page 401 of 433 Packet Page 402 of 433 Packet Page 403 of 433 Packet Page 404 of 433 Packet Page 405 of 433 Packet Page 406 of 433 Packet Page 407 of 433 Packet Page 408 of 433 Packet Page 409 of 433 Packet Page 410 of 433 Packet Page 411 of 433 Packet Page 412 of 433 SUNSET WALKWAY PROJECT PRE-ENGINEERING AND RCO GRANT APPLICATION (Prior to 2013) No. Item Cost 1 DHA, Inc. $2,965 2 Parametrix $26,661 3 BNSF $600 4 Staff Time $3,246 Total =$33,472 DESIGN (2013-to date) No. Item Cost 1 MacLeod Reckord $83,297 2 Post Cards $86 3 Daily Journal of Commerce $372 4 Everett Herald $172 5 Public Records Requests $656 6 Staff Time $25,148 Total = $109,731 Packet Page 413 of 433 Prepared by: C. Reckord 8/26/2013 ITEM NO.DESCRIPTION OF ITEM EST QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PREPARATION 1 MOBILIZATION (10%)1 L.S.$92,498 $92,498 2 CLEARING AND GRUBBING 1 L.S.$10,000 $10,000 3 REMOVE CEMENT CONC. CURB 2,219 L.F.$8 $17,752 4 REMOVE ASPHALT CONC. PAVEMENT 4,134 S.Y.$10 $41,342 5 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCLUDING HAUL 2,756 C.Y.$12.00 $33,074 6 GRAVEL BORROW INCL. HAUL 2,067 TN.$15.00 $31,007 SURFACING 7 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE - CONCRETE UNDERLAY 878 TN.$22.00 $19,321 8 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE - HMA UNDERLAY 508 TN.$22.00 $11,183 9 VACANT 10 NEW HMA 254 TN.$125.00 $31,771 STORM SEWER 11 FILTERRA 6 EA $15,000 $90,000 12 CATCH BASIN TYPE I 8 EA $1,200 $9,600 13 CATCH BASIN TYPE II 3 EA $2,500 $7,500 14 STORM SEWER (12" PVC)2,200 LF $22 $48,400 15 ADJUST MANHOLE 8 EA $500 $4,000 EROSION CONTROL AND PLANTING 16 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 1 L.S.$8,000 $8,000 17 TESC PLAN 1 L.S.$2,500 $2,500 18 PLANT BED AREA (PSIPE 1 YEAR)1,393 S.Y.$50 $69,650 19 TOPSOIL 18" DEPTH 697 C.Y.$35 $24,378 TRAFFIC 20 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 L.S.$40,000 $40,000 21 CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER 2,219 L.F.$18 $39,942 22 SIGNING AND STRIPING 1 L.S.$15,000 $15,000 23 WHEEL STOPS 26 EA.$250 $6,500 24 SPEED TABLE CROSSINGS 1 EA.$16,000 $16,000 OTHER ITEMS 25 INTERPRETIVE SIGNS 3 EA.$2,000 $6,000 26 ENTRANCE SIGNS 2 EA.$2,500 $5,000 27 BENCHES 5 EA.$2,000 $10,000 28 PICNIC TABLES 4 EA.$2,000 $8,000 29 CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK 10' - 12' WIDE 2,635 S.Y.$45 $118,560 30 CEMENT CONC. CURB RAMP 6 EA.$6,000 $36,000 31 DECORATIVE GUARD RAIL 1,550 L.F.$90 $139,500 32 VIEWING AREAS 1 EA.$25,000 $25,000 SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $1,017,477 CONTINGENCY (30%)$305,243 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS $1,322,720 OTHER COSTS 22 SURVEY 1 L.S.$28,000 $28,000 23 GEOTECHNICAL 1 L.S.$23,000 $23,000 24 DESIGN, PUBLIC OUTREACH & PERMITTING (18%)1 L.S.$238,090 $238,090 25 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (15%)1 L.S.$198,408 $198,408 26 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMIN (5%)1 L.S.$66,136 $66,136 27 $0 SUBTOTAL OTHER COSTS $553,634 GRAND TOTAL PROJECT COST $1,876,354 CONSTRUCTION COSTS CITY OF EDMONDS - SUNSET AVENUE OVERLOOK TRAIL PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATE 7/23/2014 1 MacLeod Reckord Packet Page 414 of 433 RESOLUTION OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGARDING DOWNTOWN RESTROOMS Motion Passed November 19, 2014 Whereas, convenient and accessible public restrooms are lacking in the downtown Edmonds retail shopping core; and Whereas, numerous restrooms are located around the periphery of the downtown; however, many are not publicly known or easily accessible, and few are always open especially on weekends and holidays; and Whereas, the Strategic Action Plan recognizes the need for public restrooms in Objective 3a.2(37) assigning a “very high” priority with implementation by 2016 by downtown participants with the City and Chamber of Commerce as leads; and Whereas, the public has expressed the need and desire for public restrooms numerous times over the years, while the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce receives inquires almost daily as to the location of public restrooms in the downtown. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED after research and discussion of public restrooms in the downtown core, the Citizen’s Economic Development Commission recommends that the City Council include downtown restrooms in the update of the City’s Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). Motion passed unanimously. Packet Page 415 of 433 QUESTIONS RAISED BY COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS: Question 1 - Sunset $2.0MM in 2018 - I would like to reduce to a lower number or as what was done last year when the open market was criticized at $5.0MM and "unknown is given Reason for this - we need to allow for the design to finish its year-long testing. I would like to focus on pedestrian safety since we have had three accidents this year - BUT THE QUESTION TO ANSWER IS - How did you come up with $2.0MM and if you say placeholder - that is fine...but you don't have a round number - you have a specific number. Answer: The PSRC TAP preliminary cost estimate for the $2,099,000 figure in the proposed CIP/CFP in 2018 is attached for reference. The difference between the cost estimate and the number in the CIP/CFP is an estimate of inflation from the date of estimate to the assumed date of construction (2018). The TAP estimate did not include costs for design and construction of water and sewer utilities that may be built, if the project goes forward. Question 2- Sunset in the Parks are of the CIP has funding for Sunset - remove that as we are not considering it to be a transportation element. Answer: This is for the southern portion of Sunset to improve the bluff/park area. Question 3- CFP Project Name and description: Work with community partners to locate and construct a public restroom; 1) I would like to see a temporary fix or permanent porto-units placed somewhere (like what is done for the summer market). We have maintained permanent porto-units at Marina Beach for years, so let's find a spot and see how that spot works and then move to the permanent if the place is correct. HOW MUCH would this cost? We have been batting this around since they closed the bathrooms in the OLD Milltown, so let's just find a place and try it out? Answer: The City has expressed a desire in its Strategic Plan, with the Chamber of Commerce listed as the lead entity, and in the PROS plan (Parks) to site and construct, or contract for, public restroom availability and maintenance in downtown Edmonds. This is being pursued to serve a need resulting, in large part, due to peak demands from a number of events and festivals which occur each year and contribute to the City’s ambience, appeal, and retail success. For year around, with service, one ADA and one non ADA, and considering the peak season service level, it would cost approximately $12,000 per year. I would suggest allocating this from the general fund park maintenance budget, not taking it out of the Capital budget. Packet Page 416 of 433 Question 4- CFP - Transportation Walnut and 9th - make it optional - small roundabout or signal. Personally, I think it works fine now with the "temp" marking. Answer: The transportation section of the CFP includes a project for intersection improvements at the intersection of 9th Ave and Walnut (Page 41 of the CFP). The project description calls for a new traffic signal possibly in years 2021-2026. Two projects were identified in previous CFP’s to address the level of service at this intersection. The first project added striping on 9th Ave to provide an additional lane of traffic to the northbound and southbound approaches to the intersection. This work was completed in 2012. The second and longer term solution may require a traffic signal. This project was placed in the out years beyond the 6-year plan for the Transportation Improvement Program. It is difficult to forecast when the intersection’s level of service will drop to a condition where a traffic signal will be warranted. The intersection’s level of service, along with other key intersections in Edmonds, will typically be evaluated every 6 years as part of future Transportation Plan Updates. At some point in the future, it may be determined that adding a traffic signal at the intersection is a priority to address a degrading or failing level of service. A mini-roundabout may be an option, but an engineering study should be completed to determine the cost/benefits of either solution. Question 5- CFP Traffic Calming - I believe we have changed that to 20K? If so, please change and I would prefer that we even make it higher if we can as there was yet another pedestrian accident. Staff recommends the City Council amend the proposed budget to carry forward the $10,000 in traffic calming funds from 2014 to the 2015 budget. This action would result in $20,000 being available for traffic calming in 2015. Question 6- CIP Alternative Study - Can you just explain the rationale of the split and timing. Also, would we not include the train trench cost in this item now? Do we not have and old cut and cover analysis that was performed at the save our beach rally? I would also like to understand the "regionalism" aspect of this as we talked about this last year. If we decided to do a specific method, exclusive of "an alternative" report, will we still be a player in the transportation funding coming from the State and PSRC? I really would like us to discuss this in detail as I am a bit concerned that certain citizens think that we threw $10K away by having the Tetra Tech study. Like Sunset, this is a contentious issue and I have been constantly ask to attend meetings to hear much of the same information. Answer: The Alternatives Analysis in Fund 112 on page 8 of the CIP is programmed for $1M in years 2019 and 2020. The years 2019 and 2020 were chosen because the City’s practice is to keep the first 3 years of both documents financially constrained. Only projects that have secured funding or are reasonably Packet Page 417 of 433 expected to secure funding are programmed in the first three years. For this reason, staff moved the analysis to years 2019 and 2020. It does not seem appropriate at this time to include the preliminary conceptual cost estimate for the train trench, since an alternatives analysis will determine the priority, scope and preliminary cost of project(s) to address the waterfront/railroad access issues. COUNCILMEMBER PETSO: Question 1- Please find below a partial list of inconsistencies between the CIP and 2015 budget: Fund 116 Anderson Center Accessibility, Revised budget 0, CIP $50,000 Fund 116 City Hall Security, Revised budget $20,000, CIP $25,000 Fund 116 Meadowdale Roof Replacement, Revised budget 20,000, CIP 0 Fund 116 Grandstand Repairs, Revised Budget 0, CIP $35,000 Assuming we allow the documents to proceed with inconsistencies, which controls? Answer: The 116 Fund draft budget originally anticipated that Decision Packages for several items would be approved. Based on our current revenue and expense forecasts for 2015 it was not possible to recommend approval of these items in 2015. As a result the 116 Fund CIP has been revised (see attached) to make it consistent with the 2015 recommended budget. This was done by 1) moving the FAC Accessibility analysis and the Grandstand repairs to 2016 in the CIP; 2) revising the amount listed in the 2015 CIP for City Hall security system upgrades from $25,000 down to $20,000, and adding the Meadowdale roof replacement at $20,000 to the 2015 CIP. In addition to these items that were mentioned in Councilmember Petso’s e-mail the $300,000 listed in the 2015 CIP was moved to 2016. If there is a discrepancy between the CIP and the 2015 budget, then the 2015 Budget controls since it represents the funding that has been programmed for 2015. Packet Page 418 of 433 AM-7311 12. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:60 Minutes Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Scott James Department:Finance Review Committee: Committee Action: Type: Potential Action Information Subject Title Public Comment and Continued Discussion regarding the 2015 Proposed City Budget. Recommendation Previous Council Action Narrative Mayor Earling presented the Proposed 2015 Budget to City Council during their October 7th City Council meeting. On October 21, the following departments presented their 2015 budget requests to Council: 1. City Clerk; 2. Mayor's Office; 3. Human Resources; 4. Economic Development; 5. Finance & Information Services; 6. Nondepartmental (Presented by Finance); 7. Development Services; and 8, Parks, and 9. Municipal Court. On October 28th Council Meeting, the following departments will presented their 2015 budget requests to Council: 1. Police; 2. Public Works Utilities; 3. Public Works Roads; and 4. Public Works Administration, Facilities Maintenance, ER&R & Engineering. On November 3rd, Council held a Public Hearing on the Proposed 2015 Budget and received public comments. On November 10th 2015, Council continued discussing the Proposed 2015 Budget during their Study Session. On November 18th 2015 Public Comments were received on the Proposed 2015 and included brief Budget discussion. Subsequent Council Meetings on the Proposed 2015 Budget are scheduled as scheduled as follows: November 25th 2015 is scheduled for Budget Discussion and Council Suggested Amendments December 2nd 2015 is scheduled for Potential Adoption of the 2015 Budget. Packet Page 419 of 433 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Scott James 11/20/2014 11:03 AM City Clerk Scott Passey 11/20/2014 11:04 AM Mayor Dave Earling 11/20/2014 01:32 PM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/20/2014 01:45 PM Form Started By: Scott James Started On: 11/20/2014 11:00 AM Final Approval Date: 11/20/2014 Packet Page 420 of 433 AM-7278 13. City Council Meeting Meeting Date:11/25/2014 Time:15 Minutes Submitted For:Council President Buckshnis Submitted By:Jana Spellman Department:City Council Type: Information Information Subject Title Council Executive Assistant and Legislative Assistant Recommendation Previous Council Action Council Members in the past two budget cycles have requested a part-time legislative assistant as part of one-time Council funding. Both times, funding was not supported. Narrative Considering the issue of a full-time legislative assistant was brought forward in concept again this year, various alternatives to funding a full-time person was investigated considering the amount of issues needed by Council on their own agenda memo. Items that the Council has been responsible for this year include that are not items that will be reviewed on a yearly bases are as follows, (but may not be all items): Attorney Contract, Attorney Evaluation, Tree Board investigative work on the moratorium; Woodway Police Contract investigative work; Diversity Commission Analysis, and Ethics Policies. A description of legislative assistants is as follows: complete the administrative duties that keep an office humming. They monitor congressional bills, research issues and oversee office staff. In the field, they must be personable, and have strong critical thinking skills and a keen understanding of government. Entrance into this field typically requires previous experience working in a government office. The executive assistant performs many of these duties and has only been utilized by the Council President in the past for legislative work; this memo is to decide if we want to increase her work responsibility to take on the role of legislative assistant for up to 20 hours a month which means she will report to all Council Members for legislative work. Her supervisor will remain the Council President and should there be a need that requires an excess amount of her time for research and compilation activities that may have nothing to do with the Council Legislative Agenda, the Council President will be allowed to have final decision regarding workload. Attachments Attachment 1 - 11-19-2013 Council Minutes Attachment 2 - 11-26-13 Council Minutes Attachment 3 - 11-10-14 Draft Council Meeting Minutes 1 Packet Page 421 of 433 Attachment 3 - 11-10-14 Draft Council Meeting Minutes 1 Attachment 4 - 2015 DRAFT Spellman Agreement(3) Attachment 5- Spellman 2015 Job Description Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 11/20/2014 09:04 AM Mayor Dave Earling 11/20/2014 01:32 PM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 11/20/2014 01:45 PM Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 11/12/2014 09:45 AM Final Approval Date: 11/20/2014 Packet Page 422 of 433 Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 19, 2013 Page 20  $30,000-40,000 to hire a temporary part time department contract staff to coordinate the strategic plan times (one-time) Councilmember Peterson suggested this be assigned to a department rather than a direct report to Council. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas explained the only reason she suggested a direct report to Council was she thought staff had enough to do and the Council assisting with coordinating the strategic plan would lighten staff’s load. She was agreeable to this position reporting to the Economic Development Director with funding from the funds allocated to the Council in the budget. For Councilmember Bloom, Councilmember Fraley-Monillas explained the intent was for this person to assist stakeholders identified in the strategic plan and keep Council and citizens informed of progress.  $30,000-40,000 to hire a temporary part time department contract staff to coordinate the economic redevelopment of Highway 99 for 1 year Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested this position could report to a staff member. She observed little progress had been made with Highway 99 over the past ten years. She referred to projects in Shoreline and Lynnwood on Highway 99, envisioning little would happen in Edmonds without dedicated assistance. Her proposal was a contract staff person who could speak with businesses on Highway 99, hold community meetings, focus groups, etc. Mr. Neumaier offered to consult with Public Works, Planning and Economic Development to determine to whom this person would report. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas pointed out the Highway 99 area generates approximately 80% of the City’s sales tax. The area is under-utilized due to a lack of staff. Mayor Earling expressed his pleasure at the shift from Council supervision of a number of positions. He suggested the directors and he meet tomorrow to determine whether the job responsibilities could be integrated to avoid four separate job descriptions.  Annual Citizen Appreciation Picnic o $1,000  Council part-time legislative analyst position (ongoing) o $40,000 Mayor Earling asked what a legislative analyst would do, pointing out the City has a very high quality lobbyist in Olympia. Councilmember Johnson answered this position would not duplicate any of Mr. Doubleday’s efforts but would provide staff support to the Council with supervision by the Council President. Councilmember Peterson asked whether this would be a different role than Council Executive Assistant Jana Spellman. Councilmember Johnson answered it would not be a duplication of Ms. Spellman’s work; this position would assist the Council with research and analysis.  Transfer of $100,000 from General Fund to 112 for SR104 Study Mr. Neumaier advised there is currently $50,000 budgeted for this effort, this would increase the amount to $150,000. Packet Page 423 of 433 COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETSO, TO ADOPT THE ENTIRE PACKAGE #9. For Councilmember Yamamoto, Mr. Neumaier explained there is $2,000 allocated from the General Fund for the brochures and the $5,000 depends on grant revenue; if the grant is not received, the expenditure will not occur. Councilmember Johnson relayed her understanding that if the grant was received, $5,000 from the General Fund would not be needed. Mr. Chave advised the funding is currently structured as Mr. Neumaier described. Mr. Neumaier suggested amending the package as follows: Pkg # Amended Proposed Amendment Description Revenue $ Expense $ Fund Requester 9 Transfer from GF to Historical Preservation Fund for reprint of historic preservation brochures 7,000 001 Johnson 9 Transfer of Funds from General Fund for Historic Preservation Brochures 7,000 014 Johnson 9 Historic Preservation Commission Calendar 5,000 014 Johnson 9 Historic Preservation Commission Brochure 2,000 014 Johnson Council President Petso expressed support for the proposal. She pointed out reprinting of the historic preservation brochure is done every few years when the HPC runs out of brochures; they were last reprinted in 2007. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Pkg # Proposed Amendment Description Revenue $ Expense $ Fund Requester 10 Annual Citizen Appreciation Picnic 1,000 001 Johnson COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO APPROVE PACKAGE #10. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Pkg # Proposed Amendment Description Revenue $ Expense $ Fund Requester 11 Council part-time legislative analyst position 40,000 001 Johnson COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BLOOM, TO APPROVE #11, COUNCIL PART-TIME LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS POSITION, IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,000. Councilmember Johnson explained this would be a new position to provide support to the Council. Many cities have legislative analysts; she suggested filling the position on a trial basis such the second and third quarters for half the amount. That would allow time for Council to consider how the position would assist them. Councilmember Buckshnis did not support the motion, questioning the need for another position when the Senior Executive Council Assistant to always been able to obtain whatever information she needed. Her research found most other small local cities do not have a part-time analyst other than a council assistant. Councilmember Bloom expressed interest in funding this position and suggested the Council discuss the details of the position at a Council retreat. If the position is not funded, she requested it be discussed at next year’s retreat. Packet Page 424 of 433 Councilmember Peterson did not support the motion, preferring to discuss it at a Council retreat before funding it. The Council has historically had a half-time person to support the Council; he found this a radical increase. Councilmember Yamamoto agreed with Councilmember Peterson, relaying his preference to outline the position before funding it. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS BLOOM, JOHNSON, FRALEY-MONILLAS VOTING YES; COUNCIL PRESIDENT PETSO AND COUNCILMEMBERS PETERSON, YAMAMOTO AND BUCKSHNIS VOTING NO. Pkg # Proposed Amendment Description Revenue $ Expense $ Fund Requester 12 Transfer of $100,000 from General Fund to 112 for SR104 Study. 100,000 001 Johnson 12 Transfer of Funds from General Fund for SR 104 Study 100,000 112 Johnson 12 Increase Fund for SR104 Study from $50,000 to $150,000. 100,000 112 Johnson Councilmember Johnson requested a legislative analyst be discussed at the Council retreat. COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE PACKAGE #12. Councilmember Johnson explained last year a $150,000 transportation study of the SR104 corridor from the ferry to 76th was included in the CIP. The Council allocated $50,000 toward that study in last year’s budget; those funds will be carried over into 2014. The additional $100,000 would provide the necessary funding for the study. The purpose of the study is to identify what the roadway configuration would be, look at the roadway from edge to edge, sidewalk improvements, driveway access, internal circulation and the relationship to the built environment. It would not include any transportation modeling, traffic analysis or traffic impact analysis. She and City staff met yesterday to discuss the project limits, scope, and funding. She summarized it was important to do this study in conjunction with the Westgate form-based code. Council President Petso questioned how the roadway would be designed if the study did not include traffic, capacity or access analysis. Councilmember Johnson responded because the section of SR104 from Highway 99 to the ferry is considered a highway of statewide significance, there are no level of service requirements. A complete transportation study done in 2009 determined no capacity improvements were needed at that time. Two subsequent traffic analyses have been conducted for the intersection of SR104 and 100th/9th Avenue. The transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan will be updated in 2015. Councilmember Bloom asked whether this would include pedestrian and non-motorized improvements. Councilmember Johnson answered yes. Council President Petso relayed although she voted in favor of this study last year, she does not support the study now because it has morphed into a study that will not include traffic or capacity analyses. Problems that exist at the Westgate intersection and capacity issues at SR104/76th Avenue indicate those analyses need to be included in the study. She questioned designing a sidewalk or bike lane only to find it needed to be removed to create travel lanes. Councilmember Johnson answered the CIP project has not changed; it never included that level of traffic analysis. Packet Page 425 of 433 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed the initial thought was $150,000 would be needed to do the entire 2-mile stretch of Highway 99. Ms. Hope advised $100,000 plus $50,000 would cover the full planned action, codes and environmental analysis. She would work with the Council on determining the exact area. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas relayed her interest in participating in that. Council President Buckshnis referred to the $6500 for Council meeting videotaping, advising it is a necessity and in the future would be included in the budget. The intent is to utilize Senior Executive Council Assistant Jana Spellman as a legislative assistant for 4 hours/month and the proposed $6,500 would fund videotaping by Ms. Bevington. Councilmember Petso relayed the $250,000 is intended for onetime expenditures. She suggested building the cost for a legislative assistant and/or videotaping into the Council budget rather than from the Council allocations. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas suggested the Council discuss using the existing council assistant as a legislative aid. An option would be to reduce Ms. Spellman’s hours to 16/week. Council President Buckshnis supported having Ms. Spellman provide 4 hours/week as a legislative aid because she is already in the office, has history, is able to find things quickly, etc. Councilmember Bloom observed it appeared the council assistant’s hours would be increased and the additional 4 hours would be as a legislative assistant. Council President Buckshnis explained the council assistant previously worked 20 hours which included 4 hours videotaping Council meetings. She is unable to videotape evening meetings; therefore, her hours have been reduced to 16/week. She would like to have a 20/hour work week, an additional 4 hours/week. Council President Buckshnis proposed rather than an additional 4 hours as the executive assistant, she would act as a legislative aid for all Councilmembers 4 hours/week. Councilmember Bloom preferred to discuss what Councilmembers wanted in a legislative aid, identify a job description and the hours it would entail and include that in the Council budget. Council President Buckshnis advised Human Resources Manager MaryAnn Hardie, City Attorney Cates and Ms. Spellman have drafted a job description for the legislative aid; she will have it sent to the Council. Councilmember Bloom inquired about the Building and Facility Maintenance Needs Study. Councilmember Johnson advised it was not her idea but she wanted to champion it. This study was discussed at the Finance Committee and would provide an inventory of needs rather than operating in a break/fix mode. Mr. James explained this was done in Mukilteo; an inventory was done of all the buildings, parks, facilities that included the estimated life of all the components. Mukilteo’s study cost approximately $9,800; he added $10,000 due to Edmonds’ size. Councilmember Mesaros agreed the legislative assistant position description and an estimate of the hours needed to be done first. He was uncertain 4 hours/week would be sufficient to answer questions posed to staff and to provide data and information independent of what is provided by staff. Council President Buckshnis advised the proposal is 4 hours/week or 20 hours/month. She queried several Councilmembers regarding their needs for legislative assistant and it was not a full-time person. Her proposal was to utilize the existing person in that capacity. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented she spends a lot of time doing what a legislative aid could do. The current job specification for the council assistant is 4 hours/week videotaping and 16 hours in the Council office. She asked if the proposal was for the current council assistant to work in the office 20 hours/week and the $6500 would fund a person to videotape Council meetings. Council President Buckshnis relayed Ms. Spellman’s job duties have been reduced to 16 hours/week because she is unable to video evening meetings. Ms. Bevington has been videotaping 4 hours/week. Her suggestion to get Ms. Spellman back to 20 hours/week would be 4 hours/week as a legislative aid. Packet Page 426 of 433 Councilmember Fraley-Monillas observed Ms. Spellman will no longer videotape Council meetings. Council President Buckshnis advised that was correct at this time. Her contract will be adjusted to reflect she will no longer videotape Council meetings. Councilmember Fraley-Monillas commented some Councilmembers are interested in determining how many hours would be needed for legislative aid type work. Councilmember Petso commented she had not heard of people sharing a legislative assistant and the concept seems very odd. For example, one Councilmember may ask the aid to research what cities have done to help acquire parks; and another Councilmember may ask him/her to research what cities are doing to sell off surplus parks. She was hesitant to have a single, shared legislative assistant among seven people. 12. DISCUSSION ON THE PROPOSED 2015-2020 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Due to the late hour, Mayor Earling advised this would be delayed to a future meeting. 13. CONTINUED DISCUSSIONS ON THE STUDY SESSIONS This item was rescheduled to a future meeting via action taken at the conclusion of Agenda Item 9. 14. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling advised Rick Schaefer, the Principle at Tetra Tech, was scheduled to make a presentation at the November 28 meeting. His father passed away so his presentation has been rescheduled to November 25. Mayor Earling thanked Council and staff who attended the Five Corners ribbon cutting last week. Staff and elected officials have endured a lot of bullets as that project moved along. Early reports, including some from people who were opposed to the roundabout, have been positive. Mayor Earling invited the public to the Veterans Day Ceremony at the Veterans Plaza at 11 a.m. 15. COUNCIL COMMENTS Council President Buckshnis advised she is working on the extended agenda. The Council will not be meeting on December 23 or 30. 16. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 17. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 18. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 9:57 p.m. Packet Page 427 of 433 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, Washington (hereinafter "City Council") utilizes the services of an Executive Assistant to perform a variety of confidential tasks related to its legislative and research functions; and WHEREAS, the Mayor of the City of Edmonds is by state statute the chief administrative officer of the City, invested with the power to hire and fire employees and to direct their day-to-day activities; and WHEREAS, in the interest of fostering an appropriate working relationship between the Executive Assistant and the City Council, the Mayor wishes to delegate the day-to-day responsibility for the direction of said person to the City Council's President; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Mayor wish to fill the position of Executive Assistant with an employee, specifically answerable to the Council, under specific, limited terms and conditions governed by the provisions of this employment agreement and not subject to the general personnel policies of this City; NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Edmonds, Washington, acting by and through its Mayor, and Jana Spellman (hereinafter "Employee"), do hereby enter into this agreement for employment services ("Agreement"). The Employee's employment shall be governed exclusively by the provisions of this Agreement unless otherwise provided herein. Term of Employment: This Agreement will take effect January 1, 2014 2015 and will expire on December 31 31, 2014 2015, unless extended pursuant to its terms. Thereafter, this Agreement may be extended for an unlimited number of terms of one calendar year duration at the sole discretion of the City Council. The purpose of this term is to permit an annual review of the performance of the Employee by the outgoing City Council President in order that the City Council President may determine whether or not it is appropriate to renew this Agreement for an additional term. It is one of the basic understandings of this Agreement that the Employee will work closely with the City Council President and the City Council. As such, this position shall be one in which the confidence of the City Council President and City Council shall be essential to the proper performance of the Employee's duties. Therefore, the City Council reserves the right not to renew this Agreement, or to terminate this Agreement as herein provided in order to preserve that confidence and a feeling of confidentiality between the City Council President, the City Council and the Employee as Executive Assistant. Duties: The Employee shall serve as the Executive Assistant for the City Council, complete legislative research when requested by Council, and backup videographer as the occasion arises. The Employee shall be under the general day-to-day direction of the City Council President and shall provide such assistance as may be necessary to individual members of the City Council. In the event of a conflict in such directions, the Employee shall rely upon the direction of the City Council President. A generalized description of the duties of this position is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. The listing of duties in Exhibit A is intended as a descriptive tool only, and shall not limit the City Council President or City Council to make task assignments; provided, however. that such duties be linked to the City Council President's Office and the legislative function of the City Council and shall, in all respects, be governed by statutory, constitutional and ordinance limitations on the duties of public employees. The Mayor of the City of Edmonds, by his/her signature below, specifically acknowledges that he/she has delegated his/her statutory authority to direct the day-to-day duties of this Employee, and this Employee alone, to the City Council to be exercised by and through the City Council President. This delegation is revocable and shall not be binding on subsequent elected or appointed mayors unless ratified by them. .,-- .:7 ,) '/'./- 3 - ,... ··: .. 3 , _ -f DRAFT Formatted: Left, Indent: Left: 0.11", First line: 0", Right: -0.01", Space Before: 0 pt, Line spacing: single Packet Page 428 of 433 2014 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY COUNCIL 2 3. Hours of Work: The employee shall work office hours as assigned and directed by the City Council through the City Council President. Such hours may normally be worked between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday., and generally, every Tuesday night until 10:00 p.m. In addition, the Employee may perform assigned work off site. Such hours shall be within prescribed limits and approved by the City Council President. It is anticipated that the Employee shall work up to 20 hours per week. NOTE: The level of the Employee's benefits is based upon a proration of hours worked. This general description of working hours shall not limit the ability of the City Council President to change the working schedule or adjust it from time to time. 4. Wages and Benefits: The wages set forth in Section 4 hereby provides for a base rate of $30.144 $30.74 per hour. The Employee shall be paid a special hourly wage of $45.02 for hours worked videotaping Edmonds City Council meetings that go beyond 1O:OOPM If the employee is used as the backup videographer for Council Meetings, she will flex her hours in the Council Office to accommodate the hours used as backup videographer as long as she is working a 20 hour week. The City will pay the applicable employer's portion of Medicare, PERS retirement, Municipal Employee Benefit Trust (MEBT). Washington State Industrial Taxes, and such other payments or benefits as may be required under the provisions of state and federal law based upon the number of hours worked. MEBT benefits shall be provided as required by law or by the provisions of a plan document. "Plan Document" shall mean for the purposes of this Agreement the MEBT or other contract, or policy documents which require, by their terms, the participation of all qualified employees. The benefits to be paid to the Employee shall be governed solely by this Agreement. No benefit not specifically addressed or listed herein shall be granted to the Employee. The provisions of this Agreement shall control over any conflicting provision of the City ordinances, City Personnel Policy Manual, any collective bargaining agreement or any other general grant of benefits to City employees. The benefits which the Employee shall receive are limited to the following: 4.1 Insurance Benefits: The City will allow the Employee to participate in the City's group employee insurance programs listed below. The City will pay the insurance premiums in accordance with the following schedule: INSURANCE BENEFIT/PREMIUM PAID Dental (WDS) family coverage I 45% Vision I 45% Medical I 45% Medicare /As per Federal law Industrial Accident /As per State law Public Employees Retirement /As per State law Unemployment Insurance /As per State law MEBT /As per City ordinance The City will allow the Employee to use payroll deduction (Premium Only Pla n) to pay for the Em ployee's cost of the above-listed insurance benefits. The City's payment is contingent on the Em ployee's qualification for such insurance program in accordance with Plan Documents and does not constitute an obligation to pay a sum in lieu of insurance or premium. 4.2 Vacation: Annual vacation is earned at the rate of 7 hours per month. Earned vacation can be carried over into the next calendar year, provided the amount carried over does not exceed 168 hours total as of January 1st of any year. Unused, accrued vacation shall be paid upon termination of employment. 4.3 Sick Leave: Sick leave is earned at the rate of 40 hours per year. Earned sick leave can be accumulated up to a maximum of 500 hours. Unused, accrued sick lea ve shall be forfeited upon termination of employment. Packet Page 429 of 433 2014 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY COUNCIL 3 4.4 Holiday Pay: The employee shall receive a pro-rated pay for all holidays during which City offices are closed. 5. Confidentiality: One of the basic purposes of this Agreement is to provide an employee who serves in a confidential capacity to the City Council and its City Council President. The Employee acknowledges that she has been informed of the necessity for confidentiality and understands that she shall report directly to the City Council President any matter which she feels would breach such confidence or confidentiality. In the event of any apparent conflict between the needs of the City Council and that of the City in general, the Employee shall report such matter to the City Council President and rely on his/her direction. In keeping with this confidential relationship, the Executive Assistant position shall not be a part of a collective bargaining unit or subject to any collective bargaining agreement. 6. Termination of Agreement: The City, by its Mayor and City Council, and the Employee acknowledge that this employment agreement creates an at-will employment relationship which may be terminated any time with or without cause by either party. This paragraph shall control and supersede any portion of this Agreement that might otherwise be construed as in any way altering the Employee's at-will status. 7. Indemnification: As an employee of the City, the Employee shall have the right to indemnification by and on behalf of the City for actions taken in the scope of her employment in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 2.06 of the Edmonds City Code as same exists or is hereafter amended. 8. Entire Written Agreement: This document represents the entire agreement. written or oral, between the parties. No representative or other oral agreement by either party shall survive the execution of this document. This document shall be amended only upon the expressed written agreement of both parties. The City Council President shall confer with the Mayor regarding any change. 9. Severability: The provisions of this Agreement shall be severable. In the event that any provision hereof is held to be void, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall survive, PROVIDED, however. that in the event the provisions of paragraph 5, relating to the exclusion of this position from any collective bargaining unit, or of paragraph 6, relating to this Agreement as one of at-will employment, are/is held to be unenforceable, invalid, or void, this Agreement shall immediately be at an end. DONE THIS / :..:!!.h day of 6-t (' g zrz./.LI' '2013'2014. Cl'l(OF,EDMONDS Jl Yt? c DAVID 0. EARLING, MAYOR ""'"'- J EMPLOYEE: JANA SPELLMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFF(CE OF CITY ATTORNEY Packet Page 430 of 433 Packet Page 431 of 433 Packet Page 432 of 433 Packet Page 433 of 433