Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
2023-10-11 Planning Board Packet1.
2.
3.
4.
S.
6.
7.
8.
9.
OF BbMG
ti Agenda
Edmonds Planning Board
1,00
REGULAR MEETING
BRACKETT ROOM
121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL- 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020
OCTOBER 11, 2023, 7:00 PM
REMOTE MEETING INFORMATION:
Meeting Link: https://edmondswa-
gov.zoom.us/s/87322872194?pwd=WFdxTWJIQmxITG9LZkc3 KOhuS014QT09 Meeting ID: 873 2287
2194 Passcode:007978
This is a Hybrid meeting: The meeting can be attended in -person or on-line. The physcial
meeting location is at Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue N., 3rd floor Brackett R000m
Or Telephone :US: +1 253 215 8782
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and
their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and
taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we
honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Approve previous meeting minutes
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
A. Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department - 2023 Q3 Accomplishments
PUBLIC HEARINGS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Planning Board Action on 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement
Program (CIP)
NEW BUSINESS
A. Landmark 99 Project Overview
B. Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement Review
Edmonds Planning Board Agenda
October 11, 2023
Page 1
10. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
A. October 11 Extended Agenda
11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
12. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
13. ADJOURNMENT
Edmonds Planning Board Agenda
October 11, 2023
Page 2
3.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/11/2023
Approve previous meeting minutes
Staff Lead: Michael Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michael Clugston
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve minutes from the September 27th meeting.
Narrative
September 27th draft meeting minutes attached.
Attachments:
Draft September 27 minutes
Packet Pg. 3
3.A.a
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of Hybrid Meeting
September 27, 2023
Chair Gladstone called the hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. at Edmonds
City Hall and on Zoom.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
The Land Acknowledgement was read by Board Member Maxwell.
Board Members Present Staff Present
Judi Gladstone, Chair Mike Clugston, Senior Planner
Lauren Golembiewski Rob English, City Engineer
Richard Kuehn (online) Mike De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer
Susanna Martini Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Director
Nick Maxwell Shannon Burley, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Deputy Director
Jeremy Mitchell
Beth Tragus-Campbell, Vice Chair
Board Members Absent
Emily Nutsch (alternate)
Lily Distelhorst (student) - excused
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
MARTINI, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 13.
MOTION MADE BY CHAIR GLADSTONE, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
GOLEMBIEWSKI, TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS.
• On page 3 of 9 of the minutes, in the second full paragraph, the second sentence should be
corrected to: Replacement trees wem could be triggered when the property owner has the last
two or three trees on the property.
• Page 3 of 9, the fourth full paragraph, delete the third sentence starting with, "Chair Gladstone.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENTS.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 1 of 7
Packet Pg. 4
3.A.a
THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Sue Oskowski, Edmonds resident, asked why the sidewalk on 84th (from 238 h to 234th) in the Public Works
planned schedule for 2027. When Public Works presented their transportation plan to the City Council in June
of this year the sidewalk was scheduled to be built in 2024. Her neighbor drives an electric wheelchair in the
road because there are no sidewalks on 84t'. She urged the City to put that section of the sidewalk in the plan
for 2024. It is definitely needed now.
Teresa Hollis, Edmonds resident, had the following comments for Public Works:
1. She stated that this plan uses priorities for walkways that were set in 2015 which is before the City
Council decided to put almost all of the new housing growth in the Highway 99 subarea. This CFP
mostly ignores the planning decisions that were made by the City Council about where future density
would be. She requested that in future cycles staff pays attention to where the housing density is planned.
2. She referred to the EIS for the Highway 99 subarea plan which says to build flexibility into each cycle
of the 6-year Transportation Improvement Program to modify the priority and the funding of capital
projects serving the study area as new development occurs and creates opportunities for matching funds
from private development. A building permit was issued for the Apollo apartments at 236t` and
Highway 99. It's waiting for the developer to pick it up and pay the big fees. So where are the city
infrastructure projects for that neighborhood?
3. She said she doesn't support the amount of spending in the Green Streets demonstration project. A
Green Street is a Tesla, but they would be happy with a used Prius. She suggested the City just provide
some sort of walkway so they don't have to walk in the street, especially when they walk their kids to
school. Also, please add a project for a paved walkway on 236 h between 84th and Edmonds Way since
that's a route to Madrona School. It would also support the neighborhood where development will
eventually happen on the empty lot at 236th and 84th.
4. She expressed support for the big increase in traffic calming programs for 2024.
She had the following comments for Parks:
1. She supports the emphasis on working down the maintenance and repair backlog.
2. She expressed concern that the Burlington Coat Factory site project is missing from the portfolio. She
wondered why there wasn't at least a placeholder for it in this CFP cycle for some reasonable estimate
of the city spending.
Angela Winzen, Mayor's Climate Protection Committee member and Edmonds Climate Advisory Board
member, commented on behalf of both of the groups to convey their shared desire for a climate action manager
to be part of the City's new budget. Climate mitigation is not a task that should be on a list of many others. It
deserves, at minimum, a dedicated individual who can take the lead on implementation of the 2023 Climate
Action Plan and the writing of future plans, including adaptation plans and all business related to climate
mitigation in the City of Edmonds. Edmonds needs a leader in the city office who is able to focus their efforts
entirely on the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. They cannot wait another 13 years to begin when
they are already years behind. A climate action manager for this city is long overdue and needs to be part of the
new budget.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 2 of 7
Packet Pg. 5
3.A.a
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Public Hearing
City Engineer Rob English introduced staff members and explained the difference between the CFP and the
CIP and how they have been combined into one document. He highlighted the project lists and explained the
way they are prioritized and organized. He also reviewed the layout of the project sheets. He explained that the
Transportation Plan Update will be coordinated with the Comprehensive Plan Update. The Storm and Surface
Water Management Comprehensive Plan is just beginning an update.
Chair Gladstone asked for confirmation that the priorities established in the CIP are based on the 2015 Plan.
Mr. English confirmed that is true.
Mr. English reviewed Pavement Preservation Projects, Safety and Capacity Projects, Active Transportation
Projects and Planning, Water Utility Projects, and Stormwater Projects. There was discussion about waterline
overlays and patches. Staff explained the importance of coordinating between departments to determine the
prioritization of projects. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell asked if the City is on track for water utility replacement.
Mr. English replied that they are. The utility rate analysis currently underway will reassess the utility rates that
are needed to maintain the city's infrastructure.
Mr. English continued to review 2024 projects and programs including the Stormwater Utility, Sewer Utility
Projects, Wastewater Treatment Plant, and Facilities.
Comments/Questions:
Board Member Golembiewski asked how coordination happens with other agencies if it is a road that has other
ownership. Mr. English explained it depends on the project and gave some examples. Sometimes there are joint
projects where jurisdictions share costs. Highway 99 is a state route. The state's responsibility on a state route
is the pavement condition. The local agencies are responsible for any improvements. Sometimes there are state
dollars available for this too.
Board Member Mitchell asked if the estimated project cost is an engineer's ROM (rough order of magnitude)
type estimate from a cost consultant. Mr. English replied that it is. When the Comprehensive Plan updates are
done there is typically a high-level engineer's estimate attached to each project. Board Member Mitchell asked
how many projects end up with leftover contingency funds and what happens with leftover funds. Mr. English
said it depends on the scope of the project. Mr. English explained that complex projects tend to use more of the
contingency funds, while the pavement preservation program rarely touches the contingency fund. If it is a local
funding source like REET, the money gets put back into the fund and is part of the balance available for
subsequent year projects.
Board Member Golembiewski asked how private development influences prioritization of projects, particularly
transportation and sidewalk projects. For example, there could be an area where they want to encourage
development and the City takes the lead in doing some frontage work or an area that has some developable,
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 3 of 7
Packet Pg. 6
3.A.a
attractive land where they want the developer to do some of those sidewalk projects. Does that lead into the
City's decision making and prioritization? Mr. English affirmed that it can. He referred to Highway 99 as an
example of a high priority investment area by the current administration. On that corridor, projects will be done
to beautify the corridor as well as subsequent frontage improvements that would typically be required by a
developer. These improvements save costs for the developers and help to spur redevelopment.
Chair Gladstone noted that the CIP is based on the 2015 Transportation Plan and asked how the prioritization
of the CIP is impacted by the passage of the subarea plan. Was that evaluated and incorporated at all? Mr.
English noted they will have an opportunity to do that with the current update. At the planning level, they go
through the Transportation Plan each six years, and this is the big effort to look at overall planning and tie that
into the Comprehensive Plan. Chair Gladstone asked if the Transportation Plan will come to the Planning Board.
Mr. English replied that it would. Chair Gladstone said it didn't seem like there weren't really any new sidewalks
before 2027. Why is that? Mr. English said there is no funding. The first three years are projects that have
secured money or are reasonably expected to have secured money. There is no dedicated funding for sidewalks.
Chair Gladstone asked what the replacement rate is for replacing the utility system with the dollar amounts that
are in the budget for replacement. Mr. De Lilla replied it would be about 100 years. Mr. English commented
that for transportation, at a rate of $2.8 million per year they could repave the streets in 25 to 30 years. The City
is only currently funding about half that amount. He explained that traffic impact fees are restricted to growth
related projects that address level of service. With this update they will be changing the way they do impact fees
by looking at a multimodal level of service. Part of that will be looking at sidewalks and bike lanes in an effort
to have a more holistic complete street approach.
Board Member Mitchell referred to areas that don't have sidewalks and asked about the possibility of taking
away some of the right-of-way that the City owns to incorporate some pedestrian right of way. Mr. English
noted that a local impact district would be one way to fund a sidewalk on a local street if all the neighbors agreed
to it. Board Member Mitchell explained that the City of Shoreline sometimes will put in temporary delineator
curbs into the right of way. This is a way to provide a community that doesn't have any sidewalks with a
designated area while funding for sidewalks is being generated. Mr. English said they don't have any active
programs like this. They are already $1.3 million short on paving, so to pave something like that takes them
further away from preservation efforts. He noted that there have been occasions where they have a wider
shoulder and have striped it in a way so that pedestrians could walk there. However, they don't have an active
program where they go look for wider shoulders to make a temporary path. Chair Gladstone asked if this could
potentially be a temporary solution for the area on 236' brought up by a resident today that had no place for
school kids to walk, not even a shoulder. Mr. English expressed concern that it could trigger stormwater
requirements related to detention and water quality. They typically look for opportunities where there is existing
pavement to maintain what they have so they don't have the stormwater triggers. Director Feser suggested that
some of these ideas might be able to be addressed with the new Transportation Improvement Plan's multimodal
transportation focus. Mr. England concurred.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell referred to packet page 154 and stated that they need to figure out how to prevent
the massive block of sidewalk projects continuing to be pushed out because of lack of funding. She asked why
parks restrooms maintenance funding had been removed. Director Feser stated that might just be a facilities
budget issue. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell asked staff to provide clarification on that. Director Feser noted that
there is a $450,000 program for projects like that. They are still doing the restroom projects; it just isn't under
the facilities budget.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 4 of 7
Packet Pg. 7
Director Feser presented the Parks, Recreation, and Human Services 2024-2029 CIP/CFP. She introduced
Deputy Director Shannon Burley and expressed appreciation for the large role she plays in the budget process.
She also thanked Public Works and Rob English for working with them. She presented the framework for the
CIP/CFP; current and ongoing projects; capital projects (2024 highlighted projects, programs, and acquisitions);
and a summary of changes in the program from last year's capital program.
Public Testimony: None
Questions/Comments:
Board Member Martini referred to signage and wayfinding and encouraged the City to include accessibility
Director Feser concurred and stated they intend to do that.
Board Member Golembiewski asked if Parks is responsible for the maintenance of all street trees. Director Feser
replied that they are, and it is a challenge. They need to do an inventory of all trees so they know what they have
and how they are working with it.
Chair Gladstone referred to parkland acquisition and asked what the minimum size is for a neighborhood park.
Director Feser replied that there is no minimum or maximum; it is more about the location and what it provides.
Board Member Martini referred to the waterfront walkway and asked if the apartments agreed with the City to
finally put in an accessible walkway. Director Feser explained they had not, but the courts said yes.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell referred to the ADA restroom upgrade at Seaview Park and asked if they could
use REET funding for that one since they are increasing access. Director Feser said they could use REET
funding, but that doesn't have to do with increasing access. She didn't think they could use park impact fees
because it isn't about increasing capacity. Board Member Martini argued that it would increase capacity for her.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell encouraged staff to move this project up earlier with the justification that they
can't fully utilize the existing structure they have built and paid for because it doesn't have an ADA restroom.
Director Feser asked for suggestions about what in exchange could get pushed back. Vice Chair Tragus-
Campbell suggested pushing back the Maplewood Hill Park playground replacement one year because then
you are swapping playground for playground and increasing access to the playground you have. Board Member
Golembiewski pointed out that Sierra Park desperately needs to be replaced. As far as neighborhood concerns,
Seaview has access to Seaview Park so they aren't lacking a park space. This could be another potential swap.
Chair Gladstone asked if there are any concerns about recommending the CIP for approval to the Council. She
stated that the Council needs to understand that the way that this CIP is set up perpetuates the inequities in the
city. She appreciates the philosophy that the priority is that they need to maintain what they have before they
put new things in, but if the Council wants to walk the walk about leveling the playing field here. There is some
real hard thinking they need to do. She understands that there are funding issues, but how you direct your REET
dollars is somewhat discretionary. She is unhappy that they are not seeing any new sidewalks until 2027 when
they have kids walking down a street where there is no place to walk. There are people using wheelchairs on an
arterial that is becoming busier by the day, and it is not being addressed. That overall philosophy flies in the
face what Council has been talking about in terms of trying to address some of the inequities in the City.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 5 of 7
Packet Pg. 8
3.A.a
Board Member Golembiewski asked if there is a breakdown of the amount of money being spent on
maintenance of existing facilities versus money towards new facilities each year. She also commented that it
appears that a large chunk of the improvement funds toward new items are being dedicated towards the
Highway 99 revitalization stages 3 and 4, and that maybe some of the smaller neighborhood sidewalks and
streets are getting pushed out further to prioritize this area. She acknowledged that Highway 99 is underserved
so they are putting funds there, but maybe those aren't the streets that the community is actually wanting to
improve. Maybe the issue with prioritization isn't necessarily between maintenance of existing and
development of new. In 2024 and 2025 it appears that most of the capital facilities budget is going toward
Highway 99. Maybe if some of those funds were diverted towards areas like 84" or 236th off the main arterial,
you would have more support. Chair Gladstone said in her mind it isn't an "either/or" issue; it's probably an
"and".
Mr. English noted that the majority of the funding for Highway 99 is grant funding so they can't move it to local
streets. He acknowledged that it is a complex issue. Board Member Golembiewski agreed and spoke to the
importance of communicating that sort of thing well. The neighborhoods around there don't understand these
issues. Chair Gladstone reiterated that it's more about the BEET dollars and impact fees and where they are
used. Board Member Golembiewski recommended highlighting to Council the way impact fees for the
transportation program can be used is going to change.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell said she would be comfortable recommending support of this with the caveat that
the City Council needs to find additional funds to get at least one of those sidewalk projects done every year
because it's important to the community.
Board Member Mitchell spoke in support of the Green Streets program but suggested taking some of the funding
and first putting it towards sidewalks or at least delineating walkways to give these communities a safe walking
space. After those needs are met there might be more support from the community for the program. Vice Chair
Tragus-Campbell said she also supports the Green Streets program but is concerned about the safety of people
walking or riding their bikes down the street. She is very pleased about the traffic calming program in the plan
because people are going down streets way too fast, especially with the growing population. Having calming
measures, sidewalks, and bike lanes to make it safer outside of the bowl areas is something she would
recommend.
Chair Gladstone suggested a couple board members could work on a draft memo to be reviewed by the Planning
Board at the October 11 meeting. Director Feser noted that the memo would need to be ready to go into the
Council packet on October 12.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR
TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THAT A SMALL GROUP
PREPARE A DRAFT MEMO. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chair Gladstone and Board Member Mitchell volunteered to work on the memo.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 6 of 7
Packet Pg. 9
3.A.a
NEW BUSINESS
None
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
Senior Planner Clugston noted he would be on vacation from October 6 through October 15. Michelle Martin
is also on leave right now, so logistically it will be difficult to get things done. He pointed out that the Tree Code
was already bumped to October 11. Tonight, the Board added the discussion regarding the CIP/CFP memo to
that meeting as well. Director McLaughlin was going to be at the October 11 meeting to talk about the
Comprehensive Plan, Highway 99 Community Renewal Program Update, and the Highway 99 Landmark Site
Discussion. Chair Gladstone noted they also need to have the discussion about the vision statement. Mr.
Clugston indicated that would be part of the Comprehensive Plan discussion on October 11.
Chair Gladstone proposed bumping the presentation to City Council to Monday, November 6 and doing it in
person.
There was discussion about having a small group work on a recommendation for trees similar to what they are
doing for the CIP/CFP recommendation. Board Members Golembiewski, Maxwell, and Tragus-Campbell
volunteered to begin working on this before October 11.
There was discussion about using the Comprehensive Plan discussion time for the vision statement and pushing
the Highway 99 Community Renewal Program Update out.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Gladstone noted she would be available but would be on east coast time on October 11.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
None
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 9:34 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 7 of 7
Packet Pg. 10
6.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/11/2023
Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department - 2023 Q3 Accomplishments
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Human Services
Prepared By: Angie Feser
Background/History
Attached is the 2023 third quarter (Q3) accomplishments of the Parks, Recreation & Human Services
(PRHS) Department for the months of July through September.
Staff Recommendation
This agenda item is for informational purposes, there is no need for a formal recommendation or action.
Attachments:
PRHS 2023 Q3 Accomplishments
Packet Pg. 11
6.A.a
Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department
2023 Quarter 3 Accomplishments
July 1— September 30, 2023
Administration
1. Provided event support, contract management and coordination for the 4th of July Parade and 5K; Taste
Edmonds, Oktoberfest, Classic Car Show, Birdfest and PorchFest.
2. Completed draft Park 2024-2029 Capital plan (CIP/CFP) and presentation.
3. Completed department's operating budget evaluation, data input and decision package submissions for
all divisions to include: Human Services, Administration, Recreation, Athletics, Fitness, Day Camp,
Preschool, Discovery Program, Gymnastics, Youth Scholarship Fund, Park Maintenance, Cemetery,
Beautification Program and Gift Catalog.
4. Ongoing coordination and collaboration with Sno-Ile Library to ensure consistent services throughout
remodel of the library facilities by housing their services in the Plaza Room.
5. Completed in -person de-escalation training for entire department on September 26, 2023.
6. Working with City of Lynnwood on their request for 50% funding of a $500,000 Meadowdale Playground
replacement and upgrade.
7. Procured Council approval and fully executed an Interlocal Agreement between City of Mountlake
Terrace and City of Edmonds providing $200,000 for Ballinger Park improvements creating improved
access for Edmonds residents on the park's northwestern edge.
Parks Planning & Projects
1. Parks Project Manager assumed the lead Project Management role in closing out the Civic Center
Playfield Capital project (with Henry Schroeder's retirement) including the final pay request, change
orders, reconciliation, and closeout with the State departments of Labor and Industries, Dept of
Revenue, and the Employment Security. The final payment to the contractor has been submitted,
starting the closeout process. Still working on some small park modifications to remedy a couple of
unintended design implications. Overall, the park is easily sustaining heavy public usage during the
summer months.
2. Mathay Ballinger Park —developing plans, specifications, and an estimate for park improvements. A
permanent, pre -fabricated restroom was ordered (8-month lead time) and the necessary permit
application was submitted. The project goals include installation of a permanent restroom, provide ADA
accessible asphalt path connecting the parking lot and playground as well as a connection to the
Interurban trail, a new park shelter and a total of seven parking spaces.
3. Oak Trees at 5th & Main Maintenance — completed a successful bid process and contractor is scheduled
for work in mid -December. Project involves a significant amount of traffic and pedestrian control due to
location downtown Edmonds and hours of operation by surrounding businesses.
4. Johnson Property — A successful bid process completed and demolition of the house, two outbuildings,
removal of some invasive plant material and fence replacement work is expected to begin in mid -
November of 2023.
Brackett's Landing North — A new outdoor shower and foot wash station replacement project was
completed which will significantly reduce the water usage and provide a higher level of service for
swimmers, divers and beach users.
Packet Pg. 12
6.A.a
Park Maintenance
1. Recruited, hired and on -boarded seven (7) new full-time staff including the Parks Mechanic and Park
Maintenance Worker positions.
2. Completed the Parks Maintenance Division restructuring including organizing into seven teams
consisting of Gardening, Facilities, Grounds, Turf and Fields, Beautification, Mechanic, and Cemetery.
3. Implementation of a new organizational maintenance management approach for the newly developed
divisional teams.
4. Flower basket and corner park flower season has ended. The flower baskets had the best summer
season in recent memory.
5. The summer shelter rentals protocol was modified with park maintenance and recreation staff working
together to provide a noticeable increase in efficiency due to much improved coordination and
communication between the two department divisions.
6. Parks maintenance, due to increases in staff, vehicles and equipment exceeding the current parks shop
capacity leased a small facility on 76th Ave. It required some effort to outfit and prepare for usage, but
the Gardening and Turf and Field teams are running their daily operations from the southeast Edmonds
location.
7. All large capital and small capital equipment were procured and the division accepted delivery of
outfitted new vehicles including two Ford trucks and an electric utility van. These vehicles were
approved by Council during the 2023 budget process and are necessary to support the six new
additional full-time maintenance staff.
8. Completed the replacement of the out of compliance water service line for the park shop. Additionally,
staff replaced the water service line to the greenhouse and completed a new irrigation mainline which
feeds City Park irrigation system from the water meter.
9. In partnership with a donation from Edmonds in Bloom, completed two projects including City Park split
rail fence in a restoration area and the xeriscaping project at 5th and Main corner parks. The donated
funds were used to purchase supplies and materials and parks maintenance provided the labor.
Recreation & Athletics
Revenue, Customer Acquisition & Retention:
a. Participation increase of 17% in Recreation Programs, Athletics and Rentals. Largest increase in
Recreation programs with a 49% increase in participation largely due to additional sports and
gymnastics summer camps.
b. Published Fall 2023 CRAZE online August 1, 2023; distributed postcard to 20K Edmonds
households. Current guide has over 14,000 impressions.
c. Social Media Engagement:
i. Facebook: 1862 followers, increase of 378 followers from Q1 2023.
ii. Instagram: 1265 followers, increase of 268 followers from Q1 2023.
d. Monthly emails continue to go out the first week of every month. Emails include registration
information, new programs, special events, park updates, etc. Open rate has increased slightly
by 5% to 57%. We continue to be above industry standards for open rate and click rate.
e. Reached 500 shelter rentals for the year, new record resulting in $70,145 in revenue.
2. Recreation, Athletics & Events:
a. Managed 20 contracted camps and direct offering of 10 weeks of the Edmonds Summer Day
Camp. Summer Day camp served 279 campers entering grades 2 — 6.
b. Multiple new courses offered in Fall 2023 to include Pre-K Creative Movement, Club Z tutoring,
French/Music Courses, Cuties Art Camps and Therapeutic Watercolor Classes.
Packet Pg. 13
6.A.a
c. Held a Ukulele concert at the Edmonds Waterfront Center with an artist from Hawaii, Aldrine
Guerrero with more than 45 attendees.
d. Offered 23 varieties of fitness and wellness classes with 15 instructors and 415 participants
enrolled.
e. Held Movies in the Park at 4 different locations serving approximately 1,500 people. Movies
included musical performances beforehand and food trucks. Movies generated $6,000 in
sponsorship revenue.
f. Athletic Leagues — 58 Adult Softball, 21 Pickleball and 10 Grass Volleyball teams and 106
participants attended our Pickleball Clinics.
g. 530 drop -in users for the Frances Anderson Center gym and weight room.
3. Environmental Education & Stewardship:
a. The Visitor Station was open every weekend afternoon through Labor Day welcomed 5,858
Visitors. Four new Volunteer Beach Docents added this year.
b. Beach Rangers were on patrol every day through Labor Day for a total of 65 days.
c. Hosted five week-long summer day camps, serving 68 kids; three Ranger led public beach walks
and five private beach walks for camp groups, birthday parties, and families and Three Tots
Outside programs ran at City Park, Marina Beach, and Civic Park serving 24 families. 106%
increase classes offered.
d. Hosted a new, free summer event: Storytime with Mermaid Madrigal drew 47 guests to Marina
Beach and three pop-up interpretive table programs at City Park, Mathay-Ballinger Park, and
Olympic Beach Park which drew 200 total visitors.
e. Hosted the 19th annual Puget Sound Bird Fest and drew approximately 500 guests.
Human Services
1. Social Work/Service Coordination:
a. Compass Health Community Transitions Care Coordinator's 2023 to date caseload is 112
individuals (80 carried froward from previous quarter(s) and 32 new referrals in Q3. Most
individuals served were white (58%) females (64%) ages 25-65 (70%) on Medicaid (43%).
# Clients
# engaged &
Needs identified
Closed loop referrals
Individuals served
in 2023 Q
received
from those
(service provided and
needing mental
1, 2 & 3
services
receiving services
confirmed participation)
health or substance
use treatment
112
84 (75%)
158
113
24 (29%)
Human Services Program Manager coordinated resources for 68 people primarily needing help
with housing costs (Household Support Grant coordination and utility assistance) and
food/transportation (Edmonds Food Bank and/or pre -paid card distribution).
c. Worked with County Senior Housing Stability team to secure permanent housing for a family
previously staying in our Emergency Motel program.
2. Need based programming:
a. Coordinated with Snohomish County to establish/promote cleaner air and cooling centers at the
Waterfront Center and Library Plaza Room.
Packet Pg. 14
6.A.a
b. Established a monthly partnership with the Community Health Plan of Washington to assist
uninsured individuals in obtaining medical insurance. The events take place on the first
Wednesday of each month at the City Hall Neighborhood Office.
c. Collaborated with the City Hall Neighborhood Office to provide outreach to individuals along the
HWY 99 corridor to include a DSHS Mobile Unit on a monthly basis (first Wednesday of each
month) to help people with benefits and re -certification reviews.
3. Administrative/Advancement:
a. Submitted a $20,000 grant application to Verdant requesting funding support for the Human
Services Division.
b. Secured a $400,000 grant from the Department of Commerce for Emergency Motel Vouchers.
c. Established strong working relationship with WSDOT for consistent cleanup of HWY 99 and SR
104.
Commissions/Boards
1. Staff supporting Cemetery Board and Park & Planning Board.
2. Resumed Youth Commission meetings for the 2023-24 school year and recruitment efforts led to 10
eligible applications for 3 open seats.
4
Packet Pg. 15
8.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/11/2023
Planning Board Action on 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michael Clugston
Background/History
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at
least the next six years, which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital
improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities in
order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth
Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects.
These preservation projects are part of the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with
capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related
projects.
A joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Board was held on September 19, 2023 to introduce this
topic (media from that meeting is linked.) The Planning Board held a public hearing on the topic on
September 27, 2023 (media from the meeting is linked). At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board
wanted additional time to draft a recommendation to Council. A subcommittee of the Planning Board
produced the attached CIP/CFP memo for discussion.
Staff Recommendation
Discuss the attached CIP/CFP memo and make any revisions. Forward the Board's preferred approach to
City Council.
Narrative
The 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are being presented
in one document with project lists that identify Capital Facility projects and project information sheets
for all projects and programs.
The Public Works and Utilities Department proposed 2024-2029 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 1.
The Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department proposed 2024-2029 CFP/CIP is included as
Attachment 2. Associated presentations are included as Attachments 3 and 4.
Following the Planning Board's action, the City Council will also hold a public hearing prior to final
approval and adoption.
Attachments:
2024 CIP&CFP Memo from Planning Board -Final
Attachment 1 - PW CFP/CIP
Packet Pg. 16
8.A
Attachment 2 - Parks CFP/CIP
Attachment 3 - PW Presentation
Attachment 4 - Parks Presentation
Media from September 19, 2023 joint City Council / Planning Board meeting
Media link to September 27 Planning Board public hearing
Packet Pg. 17
8.A.a
October 11, 2023
Memo
To: Edmonds City Council Members
From: Edmonds Planning Board Members
Subject: 2024 CIP/CFP
The Planning Board received a presentation from the Public Works and Parks Departments outlining the
projects that make up their recommended 2024 CIP/CFP at the September 27 Planning Board meeting.
While some of the Board members had attended the Council briefing on September 19, some had not.
However, a copy of the CIP/CFP had been provided to Planning Board members by Planning Department
staff in early September.
The presentation provided to the Planning Board and Council was similar to those provided in past years
Individual and groups of projects were reviewed without background on how project decisions were
made. It was a list of what projects would be done, when, at what cost and from what funds. We
presume a lot of thought went into developing this, yet the document does not include any analysis or
ranking criteria that provides an understanding of how projects were prioritized. We believe Council and
the community needs to understand those ranking criteria to assess if the CIP/CFP is accomplishing
desired policies, objectives, and priorities.
The one policy direction that staff indicated is prioritizing the maintenance and repair of existing
infrastructure over installing new. The current CIP/CFP prioritization of existing and new projects is likely
to perpetuate and exacerbate the inequities that exist in the city that the Council has indicated they
want to improve upon. Project prioritization in the current CIP/CFP results in those parts of the city that
already have infrastructure amenities getting better ones and those without continuing to not have any.
This becomes a glaring inequity when most all of the REET dollars are spent on street preservation in the
near future in lieu of expanding sidewalk networks. No new sidewalks are planned to be constructed
until 2028 at the earliest. Some of the badly needed sidewalks, like 2361h St. SW between 84th Ave. W.
and HWY 99 where children walk to school every day on this arterial, are not in the 2024 CIP/CFP. We
recommend that Council seek from staff the ranking criteria of how the projects within the CIP/CFP were
selected.
In addition, if the Council is serious about addressing infrastructure inequities, then the information
provided to the Council needs to be organized and analyzed differently for better informed decision -
making. This can be done by organizing the revenues and expenditures for specific projects to more
easily see which projects are benefiting from the most discretionary of funding sources- REET. It would
also be informative to see a list of projects that are being funded by development impact fees. This will
give Council a better picture of what can be moved around to accomplish Council objectives to improve
equity. The Parks CIP/CFP has information organized this way; Public Works portion of the document
does not.
To accomplish equity goals, we also recommend that select projects in the current CIP/CFP be deferred
to address community needs. One example is the Green Streets project (PWT-64). While it does not have
any current secured sources of funding, the fact that it is listed in the CIP indicates where staff resources
Packet Pg. 18
8.A.a
will go to secure funding. For example, instead of seeking grants or other funding sources for that, they
could reallocate the projected estimate dollars of that project towards seeking funding for sidewalks that
are critical for pedestrian safety and wheelchair bound residents trying to navigate arterials without any
form of walkway.
To meet the timeline for Council's approval of the CIP/CFP the Planning Board is providing
recommendations for how you can make a better -informed decision rather than making a
recommendation to approve or not approve this CIP/CFP. In previous years the Planning Board has
requested to get information earlier about the criteria and policy direction for identifying projects and
their timing. Perhaps next year we will be better able to provide a more conclusive recommendation to
you.
Packet Pg. 19
CRY OF EDMONDS
EL -
PUBLIC WORKS
2024-2029 PROPOSED
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN &
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
oi
DOW
r AL
j1
jAkworm
I
lf/\�_G'�
rpT
.1
�
Packet Pg. 20
8.A.b
TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECT MAP..............................................................ii
FACILITIES & WWTP PROJECT MAP............................................................................iii
TRANSPORTATION...........................................................................................................1
PRESERVATION/MAINTENANCE PROJECTS............................................................6
SAFETY/CAPACITY ANALYSIS....................................................................................15
NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS.........................................39
as
FERRYPROJECTS....................................................................................................63
TRAFFICCALMING................................................................................................ 65
TRAFFICPLANNING.............................................................................................. 67
GREENSTREETS......................................................................................................70
WATER........................................................................................................................... 72
STORMWATER.............................................................................................................. 77
EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION RELATED PROJECTS.....................79
PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN PROJECTS..........................................................................81
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...............................................85
ANNUALLY FUNDED PROJECTS..........................................................................88
COMPLIANCE RELATED PROJECTS.....................................................................91
SEWER............................................................................................................................ 93
FACILITIES.....................................................................................................................100
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.........................................................................122
CFP-CIP COMPARISON(2024-2029)....................................................................1 34
Packet Pg. 21
2024 CFP/CIP vl.8 I6
PWT-03
PWT-05
VPW,I,��T-07
PWT-65 �X-.�
PWT-04 ,—
PWT-51
PWT-09
PWT-12
W�6
PWT-35 `PWT-3�
PWT-48 PWT-X�l
PWT-16
•
T-11
PWT-25
PWT-15
PWT-20
PWT-08
PWT-21
�_ PWT-�9 • _
PWT-30 PWTI20 ■ PIWT-13 PWT-14
PWT-47 P.WT 3 I _ PWT-3i
PWT-06 PWT-23 PWTI"64 PWT-50
PWT-06 PWS-11
PWD-07
I� = PWD-06
J WP PWT-26 P
��' PWT-10
IL
* Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. PWT-43 0 LPacket Pg. 22
2024 CFP/CIP vl.8 II DRAFT
8.A.b
Sq/N , PWF-07 PWF-01 �
PWF-16
�^T '► PWF-03 0 f�lj 'i�11 : �i
o
yJ=y PWF-100 H *411—I Fit
v 1i "rp-mem
o q PWF-13��
mr
. ,, �
014 r - If 4#"
�k IOU
11111111111114 J92M.
.L. 11
-
PWF-09 M
fF-03 IP • PW
3 PWF-10 14
RUB' IEPF-23 F
PWF=13��
0
* Site specific projects only. Citywide/a—nnual citywide
2024 CFP/CIP v1.8 ill'
PWF-08
•
�- - --FA--TWA
�-A
rolects no sown."
IL
c�
'a
o16WF-1!
a
c
m
E
a
C WE
tNL
t- a
Packet Pg. 23
DRAFT
1 0-.\
8.A.b
a
Packet Pg. 24
�r
O
O
Cl)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a)
(D
00
M
O
O
fl
't
M
CO
O
O
N
Il-
,Zt
N
00
00
CO
O
O
O
00
O
ti
(D
CO
I,-
(O
EA
fl_
LO
O
LO
LO
O
N
LO
't
N
N
N
H)
Q9
va
6s
EA
r-:
O
Lf')
'
LO
(f>
(A
M
VztN
T
M
N
6q
(f>
(f>
EF>
6a
6a
ER
EF>
EF>
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(f>
(f>
(f>
K)
6a
K>
6a
ER
EF>
(f>
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
CO
O
O
N
fl_
Ln
O
ti
(D
CO
Il_
Nt
O
(.0
-,t
N
N_
O
(O
M
O
LLi
M
z
N
4
M
N
e9-
EA
6a
EA
EF>
EF>
EF>
O
O
Cl)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
H4
EF>
ER
EF>
O
O
Ln
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(=
O
O
a)
(D
00
M
O
O
r-
�
M
O
O
N
00
00
M
O
O
O
M
O
O
EA
fl_
Ln
O
LO
LO
O
N
LO
LO
C
U5
M
K>
K>
M
N
va
(A
K>
EA
ER
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(f>
(f>
(A
EF>
O
EA
EF>
O
EF>
ER
O
O
ER
ER
ER
EF>
O
O
O
O
O
OM
00
O
M
O
(D
M
_
IZI-
O
N
61)
M
(O
N
(f>
6F>
ER
ER
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(A
(f>
O
O
O
Ef>
Ei>
O
Ei>
O
Ei>
O
EF>
ER
EF>
ER
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(.4
M
O
O
N
N
't
6f>
ti
EA
EA
LO
N
�
M
s
pO
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
__
o
o
o
o
o
H
o
�
(D
o
(4
ER
CD
(14
5
M
Ef?
ER
ER
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
-
O
O
U> (f>
Ul
EF>
ua
O
CD
(f>
(f>
U>
O
CD
p
N
O
Cl)
O
M
CO
Ki
(f3
64
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Z -
O
O
U> (s>
Ul
(»
Ul
O
O
O
O
612�
(»
O
O
Q
OMO
O
LO
(.0Cl)
N
K->
EF>
EF>
O
O
O Cl)
O LO
O
(f3
O
Efi
O
(f>
O
EF>
O
O
O
EF>
O
O
O
O
O
O LO
O
O
O
O
O
O O
N 00
O
LO
Ni
O
0')y
y..
�
Qf
Qf
N
d
.O
a
0)
(B
0)
N
0)
(9
0
N
L
E
.O
Lo
2 33: cfl
o
0)
o
m
06
E
>
C=
0
J_
N
>
'O
3
=
C
0
C
0
CD
C) 0
0-
cn
�
O
�
>'
E
6
m
>+
U)
p
O
N
N
IC a)
>O >
�
M
O)H
>
U >a
>
>
L6 (6
Q U)>
(n
Q N
Q .L
Z., U) U
N
L
ayi 0)�
OL
U) .0 Q
a)
__
E L
>'
n
`2 � �
>
?i 6
>
?i
L C
a Q 0-�
(p
(n � 00
0
If
O M
fn N
(�
2
Q'
(n
Op d
Co Q'
CoN .
i N d
2 U)
2
x
x
x
O
L" ) IRT
O O
LO
O
LD
O
1-
O
LD
00
LD
00
O
D)
O
O
IL
a a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
2024 CFP/CIP vl.8
2
O
O
O
O
Cl)
N
ER
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ef>
O
O
O
0
O
LO
(f>
O
O
O
O
O
N
(f>
O
O
O
O
ER
O O
O
O O
0
0
O
LO
K>0
0 8.A.b
O
O O
CO O
N N
O O
O O
O O
W �
N N
O O
O O
O O
O N
CO O
60
ER
O O
O O
O O
CO Co
60 (i)
O O O O O O O
EF> EA EF> (/> EA (/> (f>
O O
O
O
O
O
O d
a
LL
U
d
O O
O
O
O
O
O
61) (f>
U>
(G
66,
(G
eFl
r
rr
C
N
E
t
C�
f0
a
LO
Lfl
00
m
Co
VJ
VJ
VJ
VJ
VJ
0
0
0
0
0
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
x
x
x
x
x
N
M
LO
a
a
a
a
a
� Q
0
U
i
rN^
VJ00
0
N �
>
00
� Q
Q
L
L
0)
°' o
6) N
�_ E
O N
0
LO
2 U) c
E
x x
x
CD ti
00
a Packet Pg. 25
O LO O O O O O O O O O O CD CD CD O O CD8.A.b
o_ rl- O O O O O O O O rn O O O O O O O
• Ln O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O
CO O O W r- LO LO O O O (O 00 rl- 00 N Cl) 00
00 N r- N O CO LO LO 00 Co Co 00 Co Co
L() N N Ln Cl) O (f} (f} 00 O O LO Cl) I,-
M - 613 _- _- Cy _-
Ea Qa Ea Ea (fi H3 (fi EA EA EA Ea Ea E4 Ea
• EfT
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
69 Ea Gq Ea 69 O O O O 61T 6q Efi V> Ea O EFJ 6q EF> EF>
_ O O O O O
� LO LO r-
N Co
M IQf� O
_- ,y EA _-
EiT w, EA
EfT
O Ln O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O r- O O O (fi 613 (fi ER O O O O O 613 O O O O
_ Ln O O O O N O O O O O O O
• CO CO O W O O O (O 00 00 N Cl) 00
00 N r- O CO LO LO 00 Co CO Co Cl)
L() N N LO O (f} (f} 00 O LO Cl) r- d
• M N
6q Ea Ea Ea (fi EA EA Ea Ea E4 Ea U
a
U-
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U
O O
N
r- LO O
Lf) Cl N
le
E�3 E�3 N
O
N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Ea EFT O O O EFT EFT EFT EFT EFT Uf Uf O O Ea ER O O O
O O O O O O O O
CO 00 N 't N O �t
O N N ONO � - 00 �
Ea Ea Ea Ea Ea �
6q Cq
O O O O O O O O O O O CDO O O O O O O
O O O O O EFT EH EFT efi O (fi Uf Ea CDEF> CD O O O 0
O O O O O O O O O O O a+
O O O N r- O O O O N V
~00 N O N.00 6s CO(M � Q
(fl 613 EA EA EA EA 6q L-
Ea 69 Ea Ea R
O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m
O (s> ua (fl ua U-3 (» (s3 (» (s3 (» (» (» (» ea (s3 era (s3 era >�
O
o
� C
co
FL
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O d
� a
ti LL
� U
O LO O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O d
O r- 69� 6C> ua GFD� U-� U-3 e» ea m O e9l 6a V3 O (n GG ea
O L() N O H O r
� 00 o m V Co00
� r O N
O E
a
c
s=
O a
0 o m co
0 p v O = 00 N
U Q O CO r-
'0 N N G
a) <n N Q. E Cu
cn a� L w> w 2 in 0 m o N o o E E E 0 o v
c E c o c Q c cn O o 0 0
a> m a) a) 0 a T a co >
c M >
aEi > > cn aEi aEi aEi ca c �0 3Q 3 mU) mU) f6> 3� Q
> (n 0 > .> > L > L 0 Y Y Y> Y>
O 2 N > O O N OL Q (n >Y (n >Y Q L>p Q
.� _ >
g a o a' °' (D g > o �U) `�° a' > o Q 0 LjjO U? U) L>, �N �C �O U)00
Q� E E E o o 0 0 g
> U v � 0 T 0 It 00 00i >U) a) .� � cn Co� ) 2 � �Q> in = ink > > > in
m a a a� >, CO � OL> Ln N a Co O N o Co 0 (o _ _ oo ai
r- C E E C C co M E r: O > M O Cl)- Cl)N o) 00 00 00 >
f- - (n (n - (n - (n - O - 00 N (n - O - � N � > fn Z N - N W N o) 00 (n 00 (n 00 fn N Q
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
(D O N Cl) le LO w ti Co C) r` CY) O N M I�r LO
N N N N N N N N N Ln tD N M M M M M M
a a a a a a a a a a M M a IL a a Q- I Packet Pg. 26
2024 CFP/CIP v1.8 3
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r- O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
� o
_ _
O O
_
LO
__
_
N
__
_
00
_
(D
_
_
�
_
_
0
_
M
_
_ _
O O
0) N
CO
f�
Cl)
rl_
_O
N
't
�t
(O
_O
00 O
N N
E!3
0)00
LO
(D
N
t`
CO
CO
Cy')E!3
Ef} O
E!3 E!3
CV),
-
-
"
E!3
H>
H>
-
CO
ER
Efi
H3
64
H4
H4
6q
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O 0
61) E13
69
E13
69
Ell
EA
EA
O
O
O
O
O
H4
EA Efi
O
O
O
O
O
N
�t
�t
(D
ti
CO
CO
M
CfT
E!>
E!3
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
6a
64
613
H4
64
O
rl- O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(=
r- O
O O
LO
N
00
O
O O
0) N
Ln
(D
f�
Cl)
r-
_O
00 O
N N
E!3
O
00
LO
(D
N
E!>
Uf O
61),61),N
V3
M
CO
61
Ell
(f;
64
69
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
Efi Efi
Efi
O
Efi
Efi
Efi
O
6-3
6-3
Ef3
ER
6a
6a
H3 O
O
O
O
O
O
_
M
O
Ln
r�
O
N
N
(D
Efi
6-3
Efi
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
E03 Efi
Efi
O
O
O
O
O
E9,
E03
Ef3
6a
613
Ef3
H3 O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
00
N
Cl)
1-
N
ti
Cl)
Cl)
N
O
H)
H)
(f3
-
Efi
Efi
Efi
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O O
Efi
O
O
O
O
O
E03
E03
Ef3
6a
Ef3
Ef3
Efi O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�N
N
Cl)M
(O
N
r-
0
_�
Cl)
� �
6s
H)
�
Efi
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
H? ua
H?
Efi
EA
E43
ER
613
E!>
613
E!>
E13
E!>
E13
Ca Efi
CD 0 00 8.A.b
O O
0 0
00 ItC..) LC)
ell ell
O O
Ki O
O
M
Cl)
Ef-J
O O
O O
O O
O O_
00
Cl) N
ellE9
O O
O O
O O
000 N
W 61)
O 0
EA O
N
N
Ifa
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
ua ua ua E13, ua Ef3 Es3 61) E» 61) E» 61) E» 61) ua Efi EA
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
EA Efl O 6c3 EA Ffl HT 61) ua 61) GG 61) GG O rl- Ef3 Ef3
Ln O 0
G9
0
0
0
N
N
EA
(09
O
O
O
U)
E
Q
T
2
CO
_
�_
_
aai
_°
a)
r`
>
m
0
N
O
N
a)N
mw
O
J
0')
Q
L
0
L
O
2
p E
>>
In
>
rn
07
0')00
d
(U
O
j
>
m?
p
>Z >
Q
Y
O
�_
>
E
>
p
E
E
cn
E
_�
00
Y
O
�00
3�
Y .
>
Q�
�'
T (/)
E
O
0�
O
O
ca
2�
C
+�-�
ti CZo
V E
=_
'
a
O
> N
>>
> Q
C
O
N
m
>
(p
=
-J
Y 2
I>"
>
_
>
> 2
O
>
>: >
O
>� >
>
Y_
(6
U
>a) CU+
1 0
�►
10
O
O
Q
(n -�
m
O O
> O
>
\ -p
c
CO
U) >
N
> (n
> (n
(n
>
O O
V
(B
�
-a
5
3
a)
N
O
N
O 'O
o
C
, :
O
fn >
Q
Q Co
N
> (n
Q
> (n
Q
CO
>� Q
>
a)
(D
Q
a
�' fn
V
L4=
U
U
O
O
L
L
L
-
65
L
0
a-
>�
U)Cc;))
O
N O
_ 0")
U
m CuC6
2�
C>
O fn
Of
(n 2
O
0
Cn d
O (.0
r r-
O O
r--
O N-t
00 N
000
00 r
Co- >
N Q
E
W
C)
N
L
4
Q) C
LL LL d
H
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
a_
U
Co
r`
(D
O
r
M
LO
CD
r`
00
M
O
LO
O
CD
r
N
M
M
M
Ln
Ln
CD
CD
LA
LA
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a.
Packet Pg. 27
2024 CFP/CIP vl.8
4
O
LO
O
Cl)
O
LO
LO
LO
O
O
O
O
�
O
O
O
O
00
O
1`
�
V
O
M
O
O
O
O
LO
Cl)
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
LO
M
N
O
O
O
O
O
�
O
LO
O
O
O
(O
O
N
•
(d
4
00
M
Ln
(O
-4
O
O
r-
CO
W
't
Cl)
O
h
LO
O
N
00
M
M
"t
M
LO
61)
CO
00
lqt
N
LO
O
co
O)
1l-
0)
M
(fi
N
f!>
LO
00
H>
Ln
Q9>
Q9>
M
1`
H>
M
r-
H>
H>
L!)
Lf)
M
ER
01
6q
(f3
N
N
M
(f3
ER
VF l
M
d4
ER
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
UY
(fi
6q
O
6a
O
O
(A
E13
EA
ER
613
EA
EF)
EF)
ER
O
O
_
O
O
O
00
O
O
00
C1
LO
00
(d
N
LO
O
(O
M
N
N
K3
(A
N
d4
ER
O
LO
O
Cl)
O
LO
LO
LO
O
O
O
O
�
O
O
O
O
00
O
P,
�
q:T
O
(0
O
O
O
O
LO
CM
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
_
LO
co
N
O
O
O
O
O
Il-
O)
LO
O
O
O
(fl
O
l
•
(O
4
00
M
Ln
(O
'
O
6
r-
CO
O
Cl)
O
N
Ln
(O
N
00
CO
O)
"t
CO
LO
61)
00
N
N
LO
Cl)
M
(d
N
d)
co
ER
N
09>
LO
00
(fi
0)
E!>
E!>
M
V-
H>
L!)
M
H>
H>
L!)
Lf)
-q
ER
Ln
H4
H>
EA
(f3
N
O
ER
61>
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(r>
(»
(i
O
613,
o
o
6�>
er>
U>
er>
er>
6a
6F>
er>
6
o
O
o
0
0
N
O
(V
O
LO
ti
ti
O
!�
00
61>
0
o
O
O
O
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
O
o
0
613
69
ER
O
6-3
O
O
EF)
EF)
EF)
EF)
EF)
EF)
O
EFi
613
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(V
00
It
LO
ti
�
(D
00
O
LO
EA
H>
M
r-
M
EF)
N
dh
EF)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
613
69
Efi
O
6-3
O
O
EF)
ER
EF)
ER
EF)
EF)
O
EF)
U)
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
m
O
It
O
N_
O
LO
00
M
M
M
ER
K3
N
d4
EF)
EF)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
O
O
O
O
Lo
O
O
O
O
69.
(f3
O
O
(f3
O
O
�
ER
69-
613
K>
N
O
(G
EF?
O
O
O
-
O
Cl)
LO
�
O
O
'Ri
O
4
M
(O
d)
O
LO
�
(.0O
1l-
�
Cl)
60
N
M
(A
Ul
6a
6G
H>
H>
0
0
o
O
o
0
o
rn
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
uj
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
�
O
(A
ER
O
O
O
—
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
00
O
O
O
O
co
LO
O
N
(d
LO
00
LO
O
It
O
O
LO
co
O
LO
1l-
(.0
Cl)
N
"t
"t
M
00
Cl)
co(D
00
00
"t
M
H>
N
ER
1l-
O
M
EA
H>
6
(f3
H>
6f3
ER
60>
ER
60>
N
N
613�
61>
61>
O
LO
O
('M
O
Lo
Lo
CD
O
CD
O
LO
�
CD
CD
CD
-00
ER
1-
�
O
O
CD
CD
CD
69-
LO
Cl)
CD
O
(f3
Cl
N
LO
Cl)
O
M
CD
CD
CD
Cl)
N
LO
CD
(O
O
4
L!)
M
O
M
d7
O
(V
r-
M
M
O
LO
P.-1`
CV
V)
(O
1`
1`
H>
00
N
ti
NM
t
H>
69>
ER
O
U')
CO,
(f3
LO
H>
(f>
H>
N
_
d?
H>
(f3
H>
I�L
00
O
0)
L
O)
()
U) 0)
C
L d)
= d
(0 N
= O
0
Q. U)
�
L O
(1
O
(�
s?
N
Q
>, m
C
L`a
i a)F—a� ��Q
x
�
L
a
a
IL
7
X
m
LO
(D
Cl)
LOp
N
N
L
N
_
U
LL
_0
0
O)
Cl-O
cu
O
N
LOCD
7
:—
C
a)
C14
N
LL
LL
�
-C
7
O
'�
:
>'
?
N
.0-�
LL
��
a
=
=
c�
o
LL i
LL
LL
0O
OL
0)
0)
L
a
N
0
O
LU
LU
N
O
6n
o
6) E
Of
Of�
in
LL
C,
a
7)
n 8.A.b
M
N
N
00
O
M
EA
O
O
O
00
cn
le
LD
N
M
M
N
Cl) d
LO U
a
LL
O U
O
O C)
N
N O
cli
LO N
ci
04
N
O
N
O
O
O
LO
cn
O �
LD
O
Oco
0
O a+
cn
ti
c Q
00 L
M <4
EA p
O m
O
O
C
� C
IL
O d
O
U
IL
06 U
M a
N
O
O �
E
t
V
t4
a+
Q
�.i
C
d
t
V
<4
a
n
Tr
�I
acket Pg. 28
2024 CFP/CIP vl.8
5
a
v
IL
LL
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
_
L
_
O
y.+
U
Q
L
m
O
m
_
_
a
a_
U
a
LL
U
3.1
Packet Pg. 29
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 6
Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets.
Maintains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital investment to rebuild City steets
$1,600,000 (2024)
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $130,000 $130,000
$1,450,000 $2,250,000 $1,150,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000
$1,600,000 $2,400,000 $1,300,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000
$800,000 $750,000 $650,000 $750,000 $750,000
$800,000 $750,000 $650,000 $750,000 $750,000
8.A.b
a
U
a.
a
$130,000
u_
$1,950,00( U
a
$2,500,000
$37,500,00( r
$2,630,000
$39,450,00( d
E
$750,000
t
$11,250,00( r
$750,000
$11,250,00( Q
c
m
E
U
$900,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $16,950,00(
$1,600,000 $2,400,000 $1,300,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $39,450,00(
a
Packet Pg. 30
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 7
185th PI SV!
nI' P1
w
� s
00
= a
= o
H
00,5t
192nd St SW
184th St SW
186th St SW
187th St SW
188th St SW
3
r,
Q
spy
Q
187th P1 SV!
T IR
3 �0
v
i 189th PI S/✓
a>190th St SW f OPT
�
o
1
191st
St SW
Sib 8014
192nd PI SW
I)r
193rd PI S
3 a
a
194th St
ss _
196TH ST SV
s s
7
103rd PI SW
T `F a A_ low
185th St
St SW SW
oO
3
�185th
185th PI
MP
Q w SW
I
�C
Q
,861hSt5W
Stith St
I
e
Sw
�
187th P1 SW�,
Q
188TH ST SW =-SW---
�
1881h=P1.
_Penny
�
Ln d
189th- PI-Sh
a 190th=St=SWs
190th_St=SW
iw,
0N191 st PI SW
191St=St-SW
192nd St
PI SW
sW192nd
¢ 3
W192nd
PI=SW-Park Wa}
S 193rd PI SW
a -.
�
-193rdSt SW 193rd St SW
194r3P1 SW
; 194th SI SW
a
a N
A
A pavement overlay of 76th Ave from 196th St. SW (SR-524) to Olympic View Dr was completed in 2023. The project close-
out and required federal documents for the transportation grant will be completed in 2024. The east side of the street is
within the City of Lynnwood and was included in the project.
Improve pavement condition and upgrade pedestrian curb ramps to meet ADA standards. In addition to the existing
southbound bike lane, the project may add a new northbound bike lane as outlined in the City's Transportation
Comprehensive Plan.
$2,583,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
$20,000
Expense Total
$20,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
$7,500
REET Fund 125
$5,000
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Other
$7,500
Funding Source Total
$20,000
a
Packet Pg. 31
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 8
UJ
�f1L ST
�A111N�S�T
w
a
DAYTON ST
Pavement overlay along Main St. from 6th Ave. to 8th Ave. with pedestrian curb ramps upgrades. The project will be fundE
with a federal grant and City funds for a local match.
Improve pavement conditions and pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) on this segment of Main Street.
a
$937,500
Design
$9,000
Right of Way
Construction
$780,553
Expense Total
$789,553
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
$672
REET Fund 125
$158,001
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
$630,880
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$789,553
Packet Pg. 32
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 9
d7 au
Q
.Q
d S� J 2 Excelsior PI
4h a CQ E
J o
O;
i� PUGET DR
Puget Way Out V z
Edmonds d
t �( Elementary
:FN
Puget Way .J
mM1W 1w,-.4F A
The project will rebuild the existing traffic signal and remove the signal heads currently on span wire and install standard
traffic signal poles with mast arms. Vehicle detention will also be upgraded as part of this project.
This upgrade will provide safer roadway conditions since the hanging signal heads will be replaced with fixed signal heads c
mast arms. The new vehicle detection will guarantee that all vehicles will be detected.
$586,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$90,000
$496,000
$90,000 $496,000
$90,000 $496,000
$90,000 $496,000
T
a
Packet Pg. 33
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 10
Q\ a
LIJ
SW
N �-
1— 237th PI;
O
O
V-
238th St SW 3 • a
C
G
Q C
c
Faith cu CD
> c c
Community Q • 238th St SW e
Church c
N
Sf 4 i
� sw
Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system.
The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.
$938,000
Design
$165,000
Right of Way
Construction
$773,000
Expense Total
$165,000
$773,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$165,000
$773,000
Funding Source Total
$165,000
$773,000
a
Packet Pg. 34
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8
Bracketts Jc _
Landing as a
South
Railroad
Station
✓awes J� Mini Park*
= Post
Office
a
C
CliJ�
.4W J�
I-
✓a�Ps
St
Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system.
The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.
$493,000
Edmonds Polic
r e%&t and Municipa
o` Court
Veteran'
Edmonds Centennial Plaz
City Hall Plaza Bell :
Fountain &MA..SIT
Design
$110,000
Right of Way
Construction
$383,000
Expense Total
$110,000
$383,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$110,000
$383,000
Funding Source Total
$110,000
$383,000
T
Q
Packet Pg. 35
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 12
Pavement overlay along Olympic View Dr, from 196th St. SW / SR-524 to Talbot Road, along with ADA curb ramp upgrades.
Improve pavement condition and improve accessibility for pedestrians of all abilities.
$1,500,000
Design
$200,000
Right of Way
Construction
$1,300,000
Expense Total
$200,000
$1,300,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$100,000
$300,000
REET Fund 126
$100,000
$300,000
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
$700,000
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$200,000
$1,300,000
Packet Pg. 36
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 13
�—�• �llc I
ell
.�
• -
All
r
I�r 1•.�
... r�+�I
'�,•j•r�a�i
�...�'� r
r� t•:r t .� �.� r
•,� r,� :,:Ili
fir ��■
r.- ._�
�►+ I , / ■.
�.
1-091 if
VtMrDM
w
mot■
185thINSW - r Illi�j�'�r'rr'...ril+Y_% -.
F'.4c���rrrt J:lr�-♦ram r �:� ■Ili . 1 J i
t I f i!
• IL;;/ ,affe-1 .._.,_.��,� �: i •III Ili • j
a ± L, �� III. w .,; �r r..•�� 1
.01
■ram 1 ■ . � • � rr.•__. I •� <." Q
1�♦ a la TY I• •t ,�_ -•tip. J'}"�.' O�
r .�� �! I ■ y�.1 .r �. v3� w•►�1.r, f� 1 ♦ t 1 1 J c2
as
11 IL
�r 'ram• ^ ti M O'• 1 _�" �1•ra'.r.rri
' too
_ 1
This project will resurface 88th Ave and improve the existing asphalt sidewalk on the east side of 88th Ave from 196th St S\
to 185th PI SW in the Seaview neighborhood. All City utilities along this section of 88th Ave have been upgraded in recent
years and the street is ready to pave. The existing curb is in poor condition and varies in height. The project will install 6"
concrete vertical curbs and repave the existing asphalt sidewalk.
Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and pedestrian safety.
$1,500,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Sewer Utility Fund 423
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8
$150,000
$1,350,000
$150,000
$1,350,000
$65,000
$65,000
$20,000
$180,000
$40,000
$1,130, 000
$150,000
$1,350,000
14
Packet Pg. 37
a
v
IL
LL
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
C
L
R
a1
O
C
O
r
U
Q
L
m
O
Co
C
a
a_
U
a
LL
U
a
Packet Pg. 38
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 15
3 --01 Iw + r•� rf-==-� ,, �'rlri, LSPI:KAN(-t .-i L1�__146
Sth St SW 224th St SW ■' _224th St S 224th StSWrq �.' Ri■��,�zzmnPiswI 3,a' .� �� I�1■. L3 aq .� ■■ ��� r �IL a'�Lr
J :zzsrhPiL-12261,
c■ +Im �1 �f a�■ y� 7� ��ir+ N! -,. �r�•� Q2r7Pi.
_ t- -- _Q
a� a 226th St SW a.--h-`St SW
in 4� a' -� '` gym* I! II'j..i 1 LQ�.r��iF ;Ir
1+ iI .71
u
rn-.e* w �} 11fTP !LJP7a 1. ` it. ti �a' Z
3 m
at a 228TH ST S�
c_e ,y r ilro 4 F -rm i'a• ■.W���■w� A • 1,_'i�s�lll +dam ■ z2a�nsrs;. a .I—
* )_ ■ i `` a 229th St-
Q "".m Ate■ '�.��a a '� �f, ■7 ' •■ A.■* •�- S' ■- 1p
�� _ ��s �■«1 � Q�. !� )� �(�� it 7 �
�O 1 a µ J _.♦ 1m� �27 iF r .a ! _
L't• ter-r ■ a' n �} - a-- 1.
m 230th St SW =� 230th St SW�
c�� u 9i• "+"' L t�
�•s r�% ' �r 3 231st■St■SW a' . 31.�a Q III ■ ]*1
■,sl■■s1 r m w �r f Ilira
232nd St SW l y a J I.;��■■�ti■ I ♦ I � ■'! �i . , ,: ,. ",ram �• 1232 1
ILI
rr P ` �r.��17w.i� �+Lw,.1�. i►* tr :�� `�■ : Q•,zari
zsznn vises
Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W to three lanes (with center two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter,
sidewalk, and bike lanes.
This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this corridor. Community Transit will evalua
the possibility of creating a new east -west bus route along 228th St. SW, if this project moves forward (connecting Edmond
Transit Station to Mountlake Terrace Transit Station).
$17,047,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$1,447,000 $1,500,000
$1,000,000
$13,100,000
$1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000
$1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000
$1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000
a
L)
IL
LL
c)
a
d
E
v
cts
r
Q
c
m
E
Q
Packet Pg. 39
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 16
N
0
�
>
>
w
a
a
o
=
a
_
M
l~n
H
p,
3
Q�
>
a
=
a
a
o
A.
o
�P
0
0
0
3
&OW,DOIIM
244TH ST
w
a
0
212THSVSW w _°
a
Z W
N >
Ln a
w
244TH ST SW
a 3
UJ
~o Q
� J G
a
,n = w
>
C
Ln Q
u
C
�
c
236TH ST SW
c
e
c
c
c
i
c
t
In 2023, the project constructed landscaped center medians on Highway 99 from 244th St. SW to 212th St. SW, a HAWK
signal — 600' north of 234th St. SW, and gateway signs on both ends of the corridor. Plant establishment and project close- ?
out will continue in 2024. i
The conversion of the center two-way left turn lane to a landscaped raised median will improve corridor safety along this ca
Highway of Regional Significance HRS with an Average Dail Traffic ADT of — 35 000 vehicles per day. The new HAWK a
g Y g• g � ), g Y � ) p Y•
signal will provide a signalized pedestrian crossing between the existing traffic signals at 238th St and 228th St. o.
U
a
u`
Estimated Project Cost U
3.1
$9,300,000
a
w
c
Design
E
Right of Way
ca
Construction $114,000 Q
Expense Total $114,000
REET Fund 125
E
REET Fund 126
t�
ca
Transportation Impact Fees Q
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants $114,000
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total $114,000
Packet Pg. 40
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 17
rubl,icorks- Transportation P
9 Revitalization Project - Stage 3
�0 r -
238th St SW 238TH ST SW Q 238th St SW
0_ 240th St SW�` 240th St SW
a
� 3 �
a 242nd St SW
o�
m °J
244TH ST SW
.9� co
N
s
�c r
mPi i
Foylo � <
ti
KE BALLINGER WAY WAY- LAKE BALLINGEFA .
'81, '>>
� h
Q x
� Sva
�$rr
S
79th Q
240th PI SW 2415t
3
242nd St SW — —
a a ZV Znd PI
� t
243rd F
The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits are from 244th St SW to 238th St. SW. The project will widen the intersection of
Highway 99 and 238th St SW to provide a second northbound left turn lane. Additional improvements will include ADA
compliant sidewalks, a landscaped planter strip to separate sidewalk from adjacent traffic, enhanced street lighting, bike
lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with potential undergrounding of overhead utility
lines).
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this segment of the Hwy 99 corridor.
$32,500,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
2027 2028
$1,075,000 $630,000 $409,000
$215,000 $1,000,000 $1,203,000
$13,000,000 $13,752,000
$1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $13,752,000
$1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $6,688,000
$7,064,000
$1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $13,752,000
a_
U
a
Packet Pg. 41
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 18
eJr
OP
ke
AV�:
■ CO
222nd st Sw- -
223rd St SW
' 220TH ST SW Q
Ad—?
lst PI SW
IMaAN'
3 22afh St S1Al d 224th s SW
I
r y
!11
224th St SW
A
The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits are from 224th St SW to approximately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW. The project
will widen the intersection of Highway 99 and 220th St. SW to provide a second left turn lane for the northbound,
southbound and westbound movements. Highway 99 corridor improvements will include wider ADA compliant sidewalks,
landscaped planter to separate sidewalk from adjacent traffic, enhanced street lighting, bike lanes, ADA compliant
pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with potential to underground overhead utility lines).
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved. a
$42,534,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Water Utility Fund 421
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Sewer Utility Fund 423
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
U
a
LL
U
a
c
$1,075,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $484,000
$215,000 $500,000 $3,000,000 $1,885,000
to
$16,434,000 $16,000,00( Q
$1,290,000 $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $2,369,000 $16,434,000 $16,000,00(
c
m
E
U
$642,300
a
$29,025 $67,500 $1,020,975
$1,092,738 $432,500 $1,979,025
$168,237 $1,000,000 $357,700
$2,369,000
$1,290,000 $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $2,369,000
$16,434,000 $16,000,00(
$16,434,000 $16,000,OOC
Packet Pg. 42
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 19
Public Works - Transportation
9 Revitalization Project - Stage 5
3 Wi GG
a' 214th St SW G�P
a
a
216th St SW
�_
Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street
lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities,
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development will be improved along the
corridor.
$47,173,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
T
,197 9n9R 9n99 9MMA
$500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,593,00( _
$500,000 $3,951,00( E
$38,129,00(
$500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $43,673,00( Q
c
m
E
t
U
$500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $43,673,00(
$500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $43,673,00(
a
Packet Pg. 43
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 20
T'`'Pg~in-`&■Jrro ESPLKANCE —
__ 234th St SW
Madrona Ln
235th PI SW
� 3
s W
in >
236th St SW Q
v F,
Q 00'
238TF: N 3
�i! _ lllllllll_
236th St SW
U
0
00 o
238th St SW
234th St SW
v
a'
236th St SW
s �
n a
c
Q
s
28 th
Along Hwy 99 from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street
lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, ?
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. i
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the
corridor.
$21,160,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a
tU
a
LL
tU
$2,275,00( _
$1,519,00( E
$17,366,00( q
$21,160,00( Q
c
m
E
t
v
c�
w
Q
$21,160,00(
$21,160,00(
Packet Pg. 44
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 21
4r
` o:
2 3.1-st#St#SW`
r r w I sa
s -
228TH=ST SW m -
.4md AIL AM
M■ O■■A -� ��J �o •, �.�
224}n StSWa_ i m 1
4. N " I I N7 �M �f _ A 229th St SW / a
iAli f r! i 3 r 1 r - F
+ �+ *sszanH` �.��^ry
p Q
230 2$Oth St §W h S 230th Si Sw
;� ■a,� 7 r'4
a L l
'.-L'r raj+
it,
$ o r
L. r, �
mi � I 7, 0. � �
r .
p
} r 1W
232n iSW .� r
Q
a �
1011191111110, up. It.
2III
3rd SI SW ir
Mee
,�
a
Maple Ln
it b Y
:
CO
,fir
rtr
234th St SW —
`�� 234th St SW
M adrona Ln
A
Along Hwy 99 from 234th St. SW to 228th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street
lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities,
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the
corridor.
$40,430,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a_
U
a
LL
U
$4,254,00( _
$5,675,00( E
$30,501,00( U
$40,430,00( Q
c
m
E
t
U
$40,430,00(
$40,430,00(
a
Packet Pg. 45
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 22
an Jpr'- ha gr
�■ :�'
�r ■ ILI
All
d w CFI
IL
ir
225th PI SW
i.
-
3 -! 225th PI SW.
�om or
NNW
a so S
a
226th St SW
-S �. co
■ ;ti`
a
�0
81st _ I } --- _ IL
o
L �� ■ IL
a `M1
J3— 228TH ST SWAll
St SW 224tfi Si SW -
-
2- y
- a
EDM
Mo UNI
a
■ ',� zed,
i
C
S
E
226TH PL SW
Along Hwy 99 from 228th St. SW to 224th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street
lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities,
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the
corridor.
$35,242,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a_
U
a
LL
U
$3,596,00( _
$2,439,00( E
$29,207,00( U
$35,242,00( Q
c
m
E
t
U
$35,242,00(
$35,242,00(
a
Packet Pg. 46
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 23
216th St SW
L—
11
LLJ
nStSW >+ 218thStSW
r`
I It 220TH ST SW
(r� 216th St SW
J
A
Along Hwy 99 from approximately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW to 216th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on bo
sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential
undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the
corridor.
$21,277,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
(L
L)
'a
LL
c)
$1,978,00( _
$2,159,00( 'E
$17,140,00( 0
$21,277,00( Q
c
m
E
t
$21,277,00(
$21,277,00(
Q
Packet Pg. 47
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 24
196TH ST SW
A
Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan
indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through
movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one
concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate
solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. The existing LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D).
This project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan.
- a
tU
Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase tf• a
LL
delay along 196th St. SW. v
Fstimnted Preiect Cost
$1,289,000 =
a�
-s
Design $263,000
r
Right of Way $238,000 Q
Construction $788,000 a=i
Expense Total $263,000 $238,000 $788,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125 Q
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$263,000 $238,000 $788,000
$263,000 $238,000 $788,000
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 25
Packet Pg. 48
Bell St
z
aU
Q
00
Anderson
Center
Field
W Bell St
MAIN ST I♦
Dayton s_tr
C
W
>
Q
2 -
Dayton_St
a
Yost Park
Bell
A
Installation of a traffic signal or mini -roundabout. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015
Transportation Plan. The preliminary cost estimate for a new traffic signal is $1,290,000. A conceptual cost estimate for a
mini -roundabout is $500,000.
The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below thl
City's concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B.
$1,290,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$198,000
$1,092,000
$198,000 $1,092,000
$198,000 $1,092,000
$198,000 $1,092,000
..
R
a
Packet Pg. 49
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 26
s _M_
r2l9th St SW
LO
oo
r' m
a 21919
00
Pa a •,
■
220TH ST SW
i
w
.. ■ . Q 7514
_
■ . M M
-� Plow A
ESPERANCE 221st PI SW
WINCO
1-2r_lN*IM2V
Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through/ right turn lane. Add eastbound and westbound dedicated left
turn lanes with a protected -permitted phase. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left
turn phase. (Additional improvements include wider sidewalk, bike lanes, and various utility improvements (including
potential conversion overhead utility lines to underground). ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan .
Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2050 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D.
Improve active transportation conditions for pedestrians and bicycle riders. a
$8,700,000
Design
$148,000
$326,100
$50,000
Right of Way
$502,000
$448,000
Construction
$6,670,000
Expense Total
$650,000
$774,100
$50,000
$6,670,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
$394,336
$398,729
$12,500
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$45,000
$45,000
Water Utility Fund 421
$18,000
$18,000
Federal Grants
$192,664
$312,371
$37,500
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$6,670,000
Funding Source Total
$650,000
$774,100
$50,000
$6,670,000
a
Packet Pg. 50
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 27
quip
226th St
,t -
S�
225thP1SW ,i•
a ,�
_
S'l
>
-J
d
xL■
L Q
2
a Q 226th St SW'
>
228th St
...$ 228TH ST SW
peet D�
a
J
�Y, i -.c = K� 7 e rEL-
j y •� • a 229th St S6
a-+�r-D
■L%J ■ �-iLKo . a
; ,3'
ee
I, � ,•I ,, %co, ., ,
�■ W 230th St
St
Q
1'231 rSs'.W c
st
�
32- S, 31. Q
_
0
232nd St
SW
..
np
5
0
2
a
CO
' Q'
v� zaznarww: m Holly Ln Q -
-' . D r�.:Y� ia4..L)..2
sett Rd
j s
L
Maple Ln�
m ii`•-E.
3
V1 Nottingham Rd
-
v
>
234th St
SW •m'
� ` 234th-st S
o
Z 235th PI SW a
Om
e��a N
s
6 a'�a" C ��
�,p
m
° 236th St SW 236th St SW 236th�
3
LJJ
The project will add a traffic signal adaptive system on a 1.25-mile segment of SR104 from 236th St to 226th St. The syster
will monitor and synchronize the timing of five existing signalized intersections (SR104 @ 236th St, SR104 @ 232nd St, SR1(
@ 95th PI, SR104 @ 100th Ave, SR104 @ 226th St) and improve traffic flows along SR104.
Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor with a current Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of — 25,000 vehicles per day
$4,810,000
Design
$186,575
Right of Way
Construction
$4,400,000
Expense Total
$186,575
$4,400,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
$7,313
REET Fund 125
$25,189
$440,000
REET Fund 126
$440,000
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
$154,073
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$3,520,000
Funding Source Total
$186,575
$4,400,000
Packet Pg. 51
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 28
QFC
PCC NATURAL
MARKET
DO
0
z
�y
Y
76 GA:
a
WALGREEN'S
�O,
o
PARKING
s
BANK
o
IL
EDMONDS WAY
L
w
co O 00 O N 00 N O
N
N O
0 00000coo w�r- r-�
BANK rnrnrnm mrnrnmrn
mi
NH
nn c
rnrn
IL
IVAR'S
�
C
c
BARTELL'S
_
r-
�
i
i
c
Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block pedestrian crossing along 100th Ave. W, improve safety to
access the driveways within proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100th Ave. W with the potential addition of
bike lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve active transportation safety.
$1,226,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$180,000
$1,046,000
$180,000 $1,046,000
$180,000 $1,046,000
$180,000 $1,046,000
a
Packet Pg. 52
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 29
227th
>
s1P2 -o
M L�
Lf7
I 228tn St sw 228TH ST SW
4kah.9 • -1
Westgate
�O Chapel
�O
PU D
Sub Station
�w
�v
ZZ
oQ
�LU
w
Da
wLn
w
Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete
Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles.
a
$270,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$42,000
$228,000
$42,000 $228,000
$42,000 $228,000
$42,000 $228,000
Packet Pg. 53
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 30
a
Y Vi
238th St SW
77
�0
os
�q
238TH ST SW,,
Q
x
Korean =
Presbyter z
Church It
Install traffic signal. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015)
Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety.
$1, 519, 000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$227,000
$1,292,000
$227,000 $1,292,000
$227,000 $1,292,000
$227,000 $1,292,000
T
a
Packet Pg. 54
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 31
Seaview Park
, Post Office
f
a
rn
FpM
W
Op
r
00'
I �
185th PI SW
Q
2
F—
186th
St SW?
n
3
a�
o,
a
it
784th PI SW
OLYMPIC V1EV pR
Lynndale Park
Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015
Transportation Plan: #11).
The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City
concurrency standards (LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
$1,347,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a
(U
a
LL
tU
a
$230,00( '
c
$1,117,00( E
s
$1,347,00( c0a
r
Q
$1,347,00(
$1,347,00(
Packet Pg. 55
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 32
U
w
a
C LLI > > SpWpp/NyJQ`l
M a
220TH ST SW
It1 LlJ J
aLO
a
_ L-
a o
3 228TH ST SW
o
moo° Fob,
0,L
o�
i
—__ - 212SH SrSW 3
IIF - _ w
>
a
0
Z
N
U')
UJ
a
w
=
a 3
w
a
�
WLn
228TH S T
n s�
a
_
Q
F�
Z �
�o
;u
c
�e
N
236TH STV� i
i
c
t
Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project w
ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). 'Itti
Improve traffic flow, access and active transportation uses by installing a center two way left turn lane, sidewalks, bike IanE 's
and street lighting.
$17,615,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a
U
a
LL
tU
a
$2,245,00( '
c
$15,370,00( E
s
$17,615,00( cva
r
Q
$17,615,00(
$17,615,00(
c
m
E
t
t�
ca
w
Q
Packet Pg. 56
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 33
i
a a Seattle
LLJ 243rd PI SW Lake
Baptist � Ba � P > Ballinger
4Q Church Q
tilp� F H
Os, ,,y0NO
11, s wA Y
�Nt20.51H ST
- �z N 205TH SAL-
N
W
204TH PL
Z
0 0
_ 0 N
LU
N2 73RD ?I -gbh J a
z
Q Y
1�
Add a second westbound left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor
Analysis (completed in 2015).
Improve access, safety and delay at the intersection.
$3,424,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a
tU
M
u_
tU
$510,00( a
$2,914,00( 5
4)
$3,424,00( E
s
�a
w
r
Q
$3,424,00(
$3,424,00(
Packet Pg. 57
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 34
";�
O
�wDALE BEgC
N'�'O
174th St SW
69
v
o`
�aa
a°
�a
173rd PI SW
O� 4
2p
4W#
\Z
Q
"sth p,swe
F
3rd St SW
174th St SW
St. Thomas
Moore School
A
Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50' storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east t(
provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay
(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13)
Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street.
$715,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a
(U
a
LL
tU
a
$120,00( '
c
$595,00( E
$715,00( um
r
Q
$715,00(
$715,00(
Packet Pg. 58
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 35
r low
ILI
• 175th St SW <
�o
H u
're" C
r r c
c
A/ c
N _
s
Snohomish z
County Park i
The project will stabilize the roadway subgrade and embankment and rebuild the damaged pavement on 175th St. SW
Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankment.
$1,000,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
M
C)
(L
u_
C)
a
d
E
t
v
r
Q
_
m
E
M
U
2
a
Packet Pg. 59
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 36
This program started in 2019 and will provide new signal upgrades, such as vehicle detection at intersections, new
vehicle/pedestrian head equipment and other signal -related upgrades. These improvements will improve the safety of the
City's transportation system.
Improve reliability of traffic signal operation.
$30,290
Design
$500
Right of Way
Construction
$29,790
Expense Total
$30,290
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$30,290
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$30,290
Packet Pg. 60
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 37
The City Council added this study to the 2023-2028 CFP-CIP during the 2023 budget deliberations. This study will re-evaluai
alternatives identified in the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Alternative Access Study and potential new alternatives for
improving the reliability of emergency responses to the Waterfront.
Both through and stopping trains can simultaneously block Main Street and Dayton Street impacting emergency response
times to the Waterfront. The many amenities along the Edmonds Waterfront (including the new Waterfront/Senior Center
dive park, marina, whale watching service, off leash dog park, restaurants, etc.) on the west side of the BNSF train tracks ar
drawing an increasing number of visitors —meaning the potential for accidents and health emergencies is ever-increasing.
The study will develop potential solutions to address this issue.
Planning
$50,000
Expense Total
$50,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax &
REET Fund 125
$50,000
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$50,000
a
L)
IL
LL
L)
3.1
as
t
w
Q
c
m
E
t
V
2
Q
Packet Pg. 61
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 38
a
v
IL
LL
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
_
L
_
O
y.+
U
Q
L
m
O
m
_
_
a
a_
U
a
LL
U
3.1
Packet Pg. 62
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 39
WIVIUNUJ WAY
■
v
I
a
r
lu
a
Q
o,
2
O
O
V.
y
�S
e �
L' a
23l st PI S6q
V
a'
n
rn
233rd St SW
v
a'
L
1 a
m
234th St SW
tSNtKANU
Q> 231 st St SW IL FQ r 40
we
s
232nd St SW
3
v
Q
N
2.34th PI
32nd PI I-
• c
C
e
C
Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015
Transportation Plan. z
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
a
$1,856,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$284,000
$1,572,000
$284,000 $1,572,000
$284,000 $1,572,000
$284,000 $1,572,000
Packet Pg. 63
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 40
•��~••�� iviaarona
Elementary School
236th St
ii
Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W. This project ranked #4
Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$1,988,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$296,000
$1,692,000
$296,000 $1,692,000
$296,000 $1,692,000
$296,000 $1,692,000
Packet Pg. 64
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 41
W
a'
Q
00
F-
U
D a a c
� s c
00
+. c
c
Q
C
L c
0 C
Z
c
Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$1,937,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
U
a
o_
U
$276,00( a
$1,661,00( c
d
$1,937,0o( E
r
Q
$1,937,00(
$1,937,00(
a
Packet Pg. 65
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 42
LSPLRANCL W
o
y �:!*I`v
=
16 1
234th
St SN'
41h St aVJ
2
A �
=
0
�
1
Madrona Ln
PARK
EDMONDS
WHIRLY
BALL
O
Q
APTS N
W
— r
T
W
i 51504
Christ
u
NORTH
11h
■rr�
235th PI Sl^
s
Lutheran
o
N HAVE z °'
MANOR w
CHRIST LUTHERAN
Church
q
01
^
L
CHURCH
TRAILER
rn Q
_
236ih St S1^/
ame
Park and Ride
OFFICE Q
�
COURT
S O
236th St SW
23601
q ��
9:- C
i,D
23603 SAFEWAY
23606 L KJIHG
@
IJ
-
100
M N
23619
�C'-�c
SUNSET
C
N
236 0
C
P
WILLOW
LL
PARK PL
O
CONDOS
BROOK C
'9 B1-10
D APTS F
R AURORA
2370132
EoENos _
C E
S MARKETPLACE
^04
CREST
B G
T
U B06
c
A
U
FAMILY PANCAKE
C
8901 m
H
V
o�
S
238TH ST SW
23800
i
23BD423810- _
SEOUL
=
The walkway project proposed approximately 1,000 LF of new sidewalk on the east side of 84th Ave W with ADA compliant
pedestrian curb ramps. z
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$1,510,000----------
a
U
r
or
L)j
Design
$88,000
a
Right of Way
'
Construction
$1,350,000
c
Expense Total
$88,000
$1,350,000
d
E
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
c,s
REET Fund 125
r
Q
REET Fund 126
c
Transportation Impact Fees
m
E
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Q
ARPA Funds
$88,000
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$1,350,000
Funding Source Total
$88,000
$1,350,000
Packet Pg. 66
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 43
206th St
m
a
� v
�
> Q
207th St S
v;
208th
SY -.
�W
208th PI S'
li D;
PI SW
III
a
�
v
O
Y
N AG
E
--
a
_ E
-
- -
a
LYNNWOOD208TH-ST SW
EDMONDS -
W
Q L
2 G
u
IL
210th St SVr C
C
c
a' a'
s a C
m v C
r� 4S
I \ f
S
212TH ST SW z
f
f
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long ,
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
The improvements will improve active transportation safety (including for school kids due to proximity of several schools)
$1,582,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$110,000 $120,000
$1,352,000
$110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000
$110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000
$110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000
a
Packet Pg. 67
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 44
q�
m
m
OLYMP\C
san n sw
r
`180th St SW05
v �
181st PI SW � 70s
>
stir
a
j
782nd St SW
PI SW
a
Q
3
a
WaY
n
W
>
co
^
�d9e
M
84th S
Q
c
184th St SW
o e C
a'
co
V L
185th PI SW
es,n sa'
41
Q� C
€sm sr s.
St SW
i87th PI SW
�186th
v
C
LYNNWOOD v co
3
>
a 187th St SW
a a a
o t
> m C
a �' <
*ia
a
>
co °^' ^
C
o -F8O
C0 _Q
188th St SW-_
187th PI SW
^
-187th P-I-SW f
188th PI SW I
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
a
$2,333,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$482,000
$1,851,000
$482,000 $1,851,000
$482,000 $1,851,000
$482,000 $1,851,000
Packet Pg. 68
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 45
ementary
Chase Lake
School
Q
c
N
00
216th St SW3
a
a�
0
00
-Edmonds Woodway High
School
Swedis
Edmorn
W
Q
2
H
- �I 8th St S1N
CO
00
W N d s
> a 9 ve W
_ `L 219th St SW
F—
00
Edmonds
F«F R A N E Church of God 220TH ST SW
A
Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
The improvements will improve pedestrian safety.
$1,738,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$264,000
$1,474,000
$264,000 $1,474,000
$264,000 $1,474,000
$264,000 $1,474,000
Packet Pg. 69
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 46
�KEGORY
THE MARINER
w COMMODORE
0
�w
_ cn
wO
_ _
Holly Dr
Alder St
a�
Q
~-
to
a,
�
Cedar Gt
Install sidewalk on the south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S. This project is ranked #9 in the Short Walkway
List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch.
$290,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$50,000
$240,000
$290,000
$290,000
$290,000
a-
LL
U
a
c
d
E
r
Q
c
m
E
U
a
Packet Pg. 70
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 47
Q MCDONALD'S
ANT
a
a
'E STEVENS
COURT AEGIS
VALUE O�
VILLAGe
Swedish
Edmonds 216th St Sv% i
�.MMMW St SW
i
EDMONDS
MEDICAL
Q p0
21605 PAVILION KRUGER ��0����
CLINIC
EN'S
TH �0
ER
Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of ,
216th St. SW). This project is ranked #3 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
$220,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$33,000
$187,000
$220,000
$220,000
$220,000
a-
LL
U
a
Z
c
d
E
r
Q
c
m
E
U
a
Packet Pg. 71
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 48
The project will add bike lanes or sharrows on the following streets:
• 100th Ave/9th Ave from 244th St to Walnut St
• Walnut/Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave to 84th Ave
• 228th St. from 76th Ave to 80th Ave
• Bike sharrows on 80th Ave from 228th St. to 220th St.
Pedestrian crossing improvements including curb ramps, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) and signing will be
installed at 100th Ave & 224th St, 9th Ave & Pine St, Bowdoin Way& 96th Ave and Bowdoin Way & Pioneer Way.
This project will create new bike connections to various destination points throughout the City (such as schools, parks,
Downtown, Sound Transit Station...). Sound Transit awarded the grant to fund improvements that will provide more
convenient access so that more people can use Sound Transit services.
000 000
Project Cost 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Right of Way
Construction
$15,000
Expense Total
$15,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$10,095
REET Fund 126
$4,905
Federal Grants
State Grants
Other (Sound Transit Grant)
Funding Source Total
$15,000
Packet Pg. 72
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 49
-
_
$ S
99t1, S
s
a a
CASP-ERS-ST�
- -- -
------200th-St-SW P
-
z
3
Mountain Ln z
Vista PI
a
>
a
'
' 3 •
L
a
O
201 si PI SW
v
CO
>
v Q
b P
- Z Car of Way
'i
3:
202nd St
� SW -=
Q '
ha St W
Sierra PI
a
v
-2
>
W
= n
Z 2nd PI SW Q'
>
>
Q - a
Q
H Glen St
Glen St U Q
s
^ °
'
D a\e
N
St SWco
p
20a
m
z
1O
-'04 h "
Daley St Daley St
J
10
a
O
Lu
'
SPI-i-si Sprague St
PIN
205th PI SW
a
E�,nd�
„ias St Edmonds St
Edmsr Edmonds St
c�
m
���--206th St SW
-
-
o
Bell St
Fm�rat fills
Bell St
o x207th
1207thPI SW
St
N Q
Q
in
t
- -- - - -
- - MAIN ST-
Dayton -St- Dayton -St
- =
208th PI S1
Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW
from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan).
Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids t
use non -motorized transportation to walk to / from school.
$2,951,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$220,000 $220,000
$2,511,000
$220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000
$220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000
$220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000
a-
LL
U
a
d
E
t
v
r
Q
c
m
E
U
a
Packet Pg. 73
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 50
aY - -- 220TH ST SW
a Nv r0 �� 1,���
o '� ■
Z ■
CC ,�
W Re -SVd 90 le, ■a�r�
0 N ZZ�st S� S S
r
� W W W "* y �
co
y ' z 221s,.
Q
,�4-co
r l) �46
7 —
Per
tto..,
}
• I �
224th St SW 0ti —
224th St sw
Q In
• ��� 6 �,
Q1 �z
Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in the Lonf
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$862,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$131,000
$731,000
$131,000 $731,000
$131,000 $731,000
$131,000 $731,000
Packet Pg. 74
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 51
a Seattle : 243rd PI SW
Baptist W Lake
FQMo 0 Church Q Ballinger
Qtilp .~o
/VOS tv t.
AY
N 205TH' SiTiilr�i •
N 205TH ST
z
N 204TH PL Q 204TH PL a Z
Z w
0 Q >
z Q
NERD p� I a W O�i02N�
, -n�ao sr m
Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners
and new ADA curb ramps.
Improve active transportation safety along this section of the Interurban Trail and across SR-104.
$1,571,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$261,000
$1,310,000
$261,000 $1,310,000
$261,000 $1,310,000
$261,000 $1,310,000
Packet Pg. 75
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 52
A
Installation of street lights along various streets within Downtown Edmonds.
This project will add new street lighting in Downtown to improve pedestrian safety at night.
$1,638,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$328,000
$1,310,000
$328,000 $1,310,000
$328,000 $1,310,000
$328,000 $1,310,000
Packet Pg. 76
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 53
Edmonds
l
Holly Dr
Cedar St
Cedar
Marsh
Howell Way
c
Magnala
a
��
Homeland
Spruce St
Spruce St
Q
01
N
Spruce P�
Z
O
1 N
p
W
Hemlock Way .. L
Hemlock St
N
LLJ
�:�,s
a
> Erben Dr N
LLJ
Seamont Ln
a Laurel St
~
°
Q a
L
=
�
L
>
a
L
G
�
Pine_'
p; ST
?ine St
C
Li
°ine St
a
c
C
},�
Forsyth Ln 0 Q'
>
Q'
>
e
C
�.Z
Fir PI
a
a
m
C
O,Q
Fir St
Z
Fir PI
y
t
Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb ramps along SR-104 from the HAWK signal to Pine St and along Pine St from SR-104 I
9th Ave S ?
This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along 3rd Ave. S to Downtown Edmonds an ._
City Park.
Estimated Project Cost
a
U_
$3,276,000
a
LL
U
?:
a
Design
$273,000
$273,000
$2,730,000
'
Right of Way
=
Construction
d
E
Expense Total
$273,000
$273,000
$2,730,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
r
Q
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
m
E
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Q
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$273,000
$273,000
$2,730,000
Funding Source Total
$273,000
$273,000
$2,730,000
Packet Pg. 77
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 54
Sierra
Park
^I ,d St
� a
A o
0
00 0-
men i.
■ A -.
192nd PI
Ai
I
'Ile
V,0
00
zO
�z
oz
W J
Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$719,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
U
a
. , o_
U
$106,00( a
$613,00( c
d
$719,00( E
r
Q
$719,00(
$719,00(
a
Packet Pg. 78
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 55
Wachusett-Rd
a
x
d
a
E
J
T
r
s,
M
X;V" 1-p7ap■
s AsRM .4 P.
IS Flobin Hood Dr
J
F,j,
Q'Ln
Z
MO
O:E
Lu
W
232nd St SIN
Salem
Edmonds Lutheran
Heights Church
4 K-12
Scriber Lake ■ st
High School
_ � I
W
Q
2
236th PI SW f
Hickman CDPark a
N
a a'
W
Edmonds > Faith
Ia
Memorial r Community 'sem s� sv:
Cemetery Church
Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in tl
Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. z
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$1,124,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
IL
v
IL
u_
v
$170,00( a
$954,00( c
d
$1,124,00( E
ct:
r
$1,124, 00(
$1,124,00(
Q
c
m
E
Q
Packet Pg. 79
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 56
218thi SW
219th St SW
a
L
W
Edmonds Church of God ESPERANCE
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the
Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$344,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
P
U
a
u_
U
$63,00( a
$281,00( c
d
$344,00( E
r
Q
$344,00(
$344,00(
a
Packet Pg. 80
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 57
PI SW
E
a
00
186th St SW a
a
188th St SW
Seaview v
00
Elementary
187th St SW
Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Shor
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$348,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
U
a
L`
U
$53,00( a
$295,00( c
d
$348,00( E
r
Q
$348,00(
$348,00(
a
Packet Pg. 81
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 58
Public Works - Transportation
238th St SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave W
..
U U
J
78
>
�
O O
O O
C
s
W
a1
(h'
>
r`
a
Q
r
o
ao
rn
I�
o
�
W
>
0
Q
`C
M
c
c
00
2401h St SW
00
Mathay `L
s
Ballinger
z
-
Park
i
Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan. z
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$1,363,000
a
U
a
Projecto_
U
Design
$199,00( a
Right of Way
'
T
Construction
$1,164,00( c
Expense Total
d
$1,363,00( E
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
r
Q
REET Fund 126
c
Transportation Impact Fees
m
E
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Q
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$1,363,00(
Funding Source Total
$1,363,00(
Packet Pg. 82
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 59
N
(D
7th and C A\je °' W
1'ista PI Q
Elm Park
2
H
O�
Elm 5t 220TH ST SW
CO (U
a
C
t F CO
/raj W
� a
OOOOOF >
= a al
Elm PI O,
O
poA/ar Goo r
aY i I
A
The walkway project is ranked #6 on the short walkway list from the 2015 Transportation Plan. The project will install
approximately 700 feet of new sidewalk, six pedestrian curb ramps and modify the existing stormwater system on Elm Wad
between 8th Ave. S and 9th Ave. S. This project will complete an important missing sidewalk link.
The project will improve pedestrian safety and provide a missing link of sidewalk on Elm Way between 8th Ave and 9th Ave
$1,100,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
$10,000
Expense Total
$10,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
$6,000
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$4,000
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$10,000
Packet Pg. 83
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 60
This program started in 2019 and will provide pedestrian safety improvements, such as RRFB's and flashing LED's around
stop signs. These improvements will improve the safety of the City's transportation system.
Improve safety at pedestrian crossings.
$80,770
Design
$1,000
Right of Way
Construction
$79,770
Expense Total
$80,770
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$80,770
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$80,770
Packet Pg. 84
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 61
Final design of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to include site design and construction documents for a safe, pedestrian
friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N
between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concept was developed
includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", as well as preliminary design development through 2020-21.
Funding for this project has not been secured at this time. The 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Project is managed by the
Community Services/Economic Development Department.
a
The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic and provide a strong visual connecti(
between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor and
contribute to the economic vitality in downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014 Communii
Cultural Plan and in the goals and priorities for the State certified Creative District. This project is supported by the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan.
$9,206,600
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax &
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
General Fund
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$1,000,000 $500,000
$500,000
$6,000,000
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000
Packet Pg. 85
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 62
2024 CFPICIP vl.8
W Dayton St
I
Dayton St
- Dayton -St
�- -
Puget Sound
G
Q
i
N
>
Maple
a
Alder St
I
�
a
In
N
r
w
St
w
Q --
Walnut
i
_St
c
Edmonds Marsh
Of
i
m
u) Holly Dr
L
c
Howell Way
Homela.6 Dr
>
Oil
CIO
a rr
n
<
dye ZI
of
Hemlock
Way
v O
04
Erben Dr
0
W
Seamont Ln
Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users.
Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways.
$380,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$57,000
$323,000
$380,000
$380,000
$380,000
T
a
Packet Pg. 87
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 64
a
v
IL
LL
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
_
L
_
O
y.+
U
Q
L
m
O
m
_
_
a
a_
U
a
LL
U
3.1
Packet Pg. 88
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 65
Install traffic calming devices along selected stretches throughout the City with speeding issues (through completion of
detailed evaluation). This ongoing annual program started in 2015 and is included in the City's 6-year Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that qualify under the City's Traffic Calming Policy.
Estimated Project Cost
a
U
$100,000 (2024)
LL
U
2029
a
Design
$11,000
'
Right of Way
=
Construction
$89,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$330,00( E
Expense Total
$100,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$330,00( 0
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
r
Q
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
$100,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$330,00( E
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Q
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$100,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000
$22,000 $330,00(
Packet Pg. 89
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 66
a
v
IL
LL
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
C
L
R
a1
O
C
O
r
U
Q
L
m
O
Co
a
a_
U
a
LL
U
a
Packet Pg. 90
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 67
The 2017 Transition Plan completed an ADA evaluation and prioritization of the City's street right-of-way. This decision
package will update the 2017 plan and expand the evaluation to include City Buildings and Parks facilities. The Plan will
inventory physical barriers preventing accessibility and develop actions and preliminary cost estimates to address ADA non
compliance.
Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City right of way, as well as City buildings and parks facilities.
$440,000
Design
$440,000
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
$440,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
$105,000
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
$335,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$440,000
Packet Pg. 91
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 68
The Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan and is being updated in
coordination with the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update. Based upon existing and projected future land use and travel
patterns, the Transportation Plan describes street, pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure and services and provides i
assessment of existing and projected future transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportation priorities and
guides the development of the six -year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital Improvement Program (CIP) an
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The plan was last updated in 2015.
The Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The
Transportation Plan is being updated in coordination with the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update. Based upon existing and
projected future land use and travel patterns, the Transportation Plan describes roadway pedestrian, bicycle and transit
infrastructure and services and provides an assessment of existing and projected future transportation needs. The Plan will
establish the transportation priorities and guides the development of the six -year Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP), Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and introduce Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS).
$406,000
Planning
$236,085
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
$236,085
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
$236,085
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Funding Source Total
$236,085
a
L)
IL
LL
U
a
d
E
M
c�
r
Q
c
m
E
s
Q
Packet Pg. 92
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 69
a
v
IL
LL
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
C
L
R
a1
O
C
O
r
U
Q
L
m
O
Co
a
a_
U
a
LL
U
a
Packet Pg. 93
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 70
The City of Edmonds proposes the development of this project to demonstrate how green infrastructure can both address
stormwater flows and enhance the streetscapes to benefit the Hwy 99 neighborhood and the downtown core.
This project includes the following elements:
• Roadway narrowing to reduce traffic speeds and to reduce impervious surface (vehicular capacity retained)
• Sidewalks and planting strips added
• Bioretention cells collect runoff from the road through curb cuts
• Bioretention cells collect runoff directly from sidewalks
• Public private partnership potential with Housing Hope and Terrace Place developments.
Incorporating green streets into the urban fabric of the City of Edmonds is intended to demonstrate how trees, vegetation,
engineered green stormwater solutions, physical and visual narrowing of vehicular lane widths, and shortening pedestrian
crossings with curb bulbs help to slow traffic, ameliorate climate change impacts, and reinforce desired land use and
transportation patterns on appropriate street rights -of -way. This project is intended to increase the livability of a diverse,
growing city.
$3,500,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$350,000
$3,150,000
$350,000 $3,150,000
$350,000 $3,150,000
$350,000 $3,150,000
a
Packet Pg. 94
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 71
8.A.b
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
o
O
o
O
o
O
o
C
0
(n
NC)
O_
0
N
O
(fl
(n
Cl)
(O
(n
O
00
CT0
O
N
(4
M
O
M
(n
�
O
M
N
E9
Co
V
V
V
V
V
Cl)
O
(4
ER
(4
ER
64
ER
O
E4
(4
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ER
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
O
64
_
O
r-
_
(C
N
O
�3
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
N
O
O
O
N
O
O
(O
V)
Co
(fl
O
V
O
O
N
(4
M
O
M
(n
I�
O
(O
N
GG
Cl)
V
V
V
V
V
U3
O
E4
(4
E4
E4
(4
E4
04
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(4
(4
E4
ER
EA
(4
E4
O
O
(4
_
O
O
O
M
V
N
(O
V
ER
69
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
E9
04
EA
E4
E4
(4
O
O
E9
64
_
O
O
V
(fl
N_
Co
V
U'J
(4
(4
(4
(4
EA
(4
O
O
(4
EA
(4
_
O
O
CO
N
(D
O
W
LO
M
E9
(4
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
E9
E4
EA
E4
O
O
EA
64
E9
O
_
O
O
O
M
O
O
W
00
V)
LO
E4
CO
FM
a
o
o
O
o
O
o
0
0
0
0
(4
(4
(4
O
O
ER
(4
(4
(4
O
-
o
O
o
CO
I�
O
(D
V
O
CO
LO
V
M61)
U')
U')
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
E9
(4
ER
64
E4
O
_
o
0
o
O
O
ui
o
o
(o
0
N
04
Cl
lqt
00
uj
Cl)
61>
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
MM
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
�
O)
Q
m
m
m
m
m
m
0)
m
rn
m
0)
m
rn
rn
o6
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
a
a`
a
a`
a
a`
a
a
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
Cu
�-
a�
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
a
U
OS
U
M
U
OS
U
M
U
OS
U
M
U
CU
U
(6
O
D_
0_
O_
0_
O_
0_
O_
D_
N
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a v)
N
m N
(6
(6
(6
(6
(6
(6
(6
c
C:
c
C:
c
C:
C: 0
a>
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
a
m0
J �2
V
O
00
O
O
N
>
N
N
N
N
N
U
N
N
N O
aS
N
N
U>
U7
U>
U7
U>
V>
N OS
(B
03
(6
OS
(6
OS
(6 LPL
N
N a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a06
>-
0
Cl)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a a
2024 CFP/CIP vl.8
73
0
C
CoIR
M
O
O
r
r
O
N
O
O
O
Co
Q01
LO
Cl)
H
O
O
O
Cl)
ia
ia
O
O
O
a
O
O
CO
N
M
4a
(A
O
O
N
N
Co
0
M
4a
O
0
Cli
O
0
zo
Co
c2
(4
CD
O
O
r
r
N
O
EFT
O
O
7
Co
Cl)
(4
O
O
O
7
(4
O
O
O
V
U3
O
O
W
(n
7
E4
O
O
N
Co
Co
()
O
O
eq
v
li
[6
Packet Pg. 96
a
Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the project will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at
various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone tc
breakage due to its material properties. Road pavement overlays will cover areas of roadways that were excavated and
patched in previous years as part of the Waterline Replacement Projects.
Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to the Annual Waterline Replaceme
Projects.
o.
U
Estimated Project Cost
a
u_
U
$225,000
3.1
a
w
Design
$20,000
W
E
Right of Way
Construction
$205,000
m
Q
Expense Total
$225,000
Water Fund 421
$225,000
_
m
E
Funding Source Total
$225,000
Q
Packet Pg. 97
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 74
8.A.b
Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at
various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone t(
breakage due to its material properties.
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of breakages and a
leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease overall
day to day maintenance
costs.
a
a_
U
Estimated Project Cost
a
u_
$2.1 to $4.9 million/year
U
a
Design
$461,000
$547,000
$569,000
$592,000
$616,000
$641,000 $13,348,01( _
Right of Way
E
Construction
$3,525,000
$3,666,000
$3,813,000
$3,966,000
$4,124,000
$4,289,000 $89,328,99( 0
Expense Total
$3,986,000
$4,213,000
$4,382,000
$4,558,000
$4,740,000
$4,930,000 $102,677,00( Q
Water Fund 421
$3,736,000
$4,213,000
$4,382,000
$4,558,000
$4,740,000
$4,930,000 $102,677,00(
Funding Source Total
$3,736,000
$4,213,000
$4,382,000
$4,558,000
$4,740,000
$4,930,000 $102,677,00( E
t
U
a
Packet Pg. 98
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 75
s
I
185th PI SW
QJ
<
Yost Park
rn
Ld
W
Q
2
�eadb
I-
00
�0
186th PI SW
Sview
0�
a I�O0
Water Tank
G' y
y
This work is being done to provide structural upgrades, repair leakages, and upgrades to our two underground potable wat
storage reservoirs. Preliminary findings completed in early 2023 were used to determine order of magnitude/preliminary
costs and next steps for the now planned repairs and upgrades project. The Yost Reservoir report shows that it will need a
major structural and seismic retrofit, plus repairs to address leakage from the reservoir. The report for the Seaview
Reservoir shows similar issues as the Yost Reservoir, with a less serious leakage issue.
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of leakage, retrofit
structures so that they meet current structural codes to improve their resiliency during earthquakes, and decrease overall
day to day maintenance costs.
$9,659,430
Design
$850,000
$650,000
Right of Way
Construction
$3,850,000
$3,850,000
Expense Total
$850,000
$4,500,000
$3,850,000
_
Water Fund 421
$850,000
$4,500,000
$3,850,000
Funding Source Total
$850,000
$4,500,000
$3,850,000
a
Packet Pg. 99
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 76
8.A.b
IL
v
IL
LL
N
N
N
Cl)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
O_
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
N
•
V
O
O
It
O
O
rl-
N
(D
CO
V
U')
LO
O
N
•
M
O
Co
O
O
N
1-
O
(O
LO
Ln
LO
1`
h
O
O
LO
N
M_
C)
C)N
M
M
Cl)
M
EA
N
EA
M
EA
N
N
N
N
N
CA
EA
EA
O
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
E4
K3
K3
K3
V
ti
K3
(R
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
E4
(4
E4
EA
(4
E4
E4
E4
EA
E4
E4
EA
(A
00
O
O
O
O
O
"t
M
ti
O
O
E4
V
LO
K3
(A
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl)
O
O
O
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
V
O
CD
V
O
O
h
N
CO
M
;t
LO
LO
O
N
•
M
C)M
O
O
N
f`
_
O)
CO
LO
O
LO
(O
O
LO
N
M
C)O
N
M
M
M
Cl)
O
E4
E4
M
N
N
N
N
N
EA
EA
E4
LO
•
E4
(Al
EA
K3
(A
(13
(13
(13
N
(fT
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(A
O
(A
(A
E4
E4
(A
E4
(A
Qf
(A
O
O
(A
(4
O
_
O
O
O
O
O
Nt
LO
O
O
to
�
Co
E4
EA
N
EA
E9
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(A
O
(A
643
E4
E4
(A
(A
643
6p3
O
O
(4
(4
(4
O
_
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Co
O
�
Co
M
E4
EA
N
EA
E9
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U�l
UD�
UD�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
_
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
LO
LO
O
O
O
Co
M
N
CO
_-
E4
LO
(4
EA
(4
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
09
U�l
�
CD
�
�
�
CD
CD
�
�
60
�
�
_
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
1-
M
I*
C
ua
Ln
a�
M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
M
C
�
O
O
EA
E4
E4
E4
q
C
EA
64
EA
E4
E4
E4
�
rl-
Co
O
O
OK3
EA
E4
L,.j
COO
EA
M
EA
O
�
E9
O
C)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
_
y
C)
O
C)
O
C)
O
CD
M
6-
C)
O
C)
O
C:)
O
�
�
64
�
�
C)
O
CDa)
O
M
V
�
O
OM
�
N_
r-
N
-
O
LOO
O
E4
64
r-
(4
LO
(4
E4
Co
M
(4
M
(4
M
(4
O
L
E4
(4
a
a
a�
C
p
M
V
LO
CO
r
CA
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
(6
O
d
0)
H
.o
@
a
U
2
.O
o
.O
0
.O
0
.O
0
.O
0
.O
0
>
N
>
tZ
@
..
06
LL
L1
L1
m
m
y
Cn
O
flooO
0-
C
C
Q
O
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
(U
L
N
N
0
N
N
N
R
'Cu
C
O
0T
0
Op
O
lE
@
C6
@
N
(D
Q
L
O
Cu
m°
�
E
-a0
a
"
w
m
Q
L�
a
m�
a
E
E
E
E
E
E
o
M
y
CU
(D
mO
p
a)O
O
O
O
O
O
0)
L
m
(O
Cm
>
O
(�
(�
(�
(�
T
L
i
V
Y
N
0)
(U
C
N
Q-'
C)
= O
.i
C6
@
@
@
@
M
@
7 U)
f6
Cu
(D
Y
75 E
CO
LL,
C
7
7
7
7
7
C U
V
7
y
2i
-E
C)
C)
0)
c
c
c
c
c
c
>
O
Co
.f6
d
CU
MV
LO
CO
I1-
Co
C)0
(C6
LE
_
E
LU
•
E
i
O
O
=
U)
Lo
m
m
m
m
m
NO
O
O
•
W
LU
a
O
0-
O
J
N
d
(n
N
J
M
h (n
Q
L
d
L
d
L
d
L
d
L
d
L
Ll
L 7
d LL
N
�!
Cn
0
Z
LU
a
X
Cl)
IM
O
N
N
M
I
LO
O
00
M
n
liJ
O
O
O
N
O
N
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
r
J
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
0
2024 CFP/CIP vl.8
78
� �
8.A.b
O (fl
O LO O
O V Co O
CO N CO
(fl
(O (A (4 64
E4
CD CD C:)
� 6s
O
O
CO
O
LO
E4
1- 00 � O)
(O (C N LO
N � M O
O N M
CO O
(A (A E4
EA
O � � Cq
O
d)
CO
V
N
(A
O � CD CD
O
O
M
CD CD
N
EA
6s � CD O
O O
O O
O N
Co N
(4 EA
CD V
O J UD) O
� N
UDI 6q
- M M M
O (fl CO LO
CD 00 r CD O
6s � O
� f4
00 � 6q
P-� O (O
� M LO
C
N Co d-T
N
N
V
C
LL
Cn
w 45
.U-. C
(6
W N
a`) c (D
3 m
3 Li 0
E Q m
d U V)
Q w
a
J
Q
Packet Pg. 101
a
v
IL
LL
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
C
i
R
a1
O
C
O
r
U
Q
m
O
m
O!
C
C
R
a
a_
U
IL
LL
U
a
Packet Pg. 102
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 79
Edmonds Marsh 4
N
C 0
O
y C
WI
Wildlife
Refuge
City Park
Howell Way
T
—0—M
a A i iW
�t
I_1
The project will be improving water quality of stormwater runoff by replacing existing catch basins along the west side of S
104 funded via a DOE grant and on the east side of SR-104 via a state funded appropriation. The catch basins will be
replaced with catch basins that include water filter cartridges. Staff proposes this effort in order to provide water quality
mitigation for all discharges that directly enter the marsh from these locations.
Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the west portions of SR-104 located near C
marsh. The improvements will provide better habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh. a
$876,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
2024 202
$644,843
$90,000 $644,843
$11,250 $69,211
$78,750 $575,632
$90,000 $644,843
U
a
u_
U
a
0S-
a�
E
Q
c
m
E
U
a
Packet Pg. 103
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 80
a
v
IL
a_
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
C
i
R
a1
O
C
O
r
U
Q
m
O
m
O!
C
C
R
a
a_
U
a
a_
U
a
Packet Pg. 104
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 81
Reducing scouring flows to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified in a previous basin report completed ii a
2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The project! 'a
funded by this program are incremental steps toward recovering this stream run as adequate fish habitat. These efforts hai o
become even more critical given recent challenges around the Perrinville Creek outfall area. This program is a fund for °0
g� g p g c
implementing projects within the Perrinville Creek basin to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allows staff flexibility to c
respond to ad -hoc opportunities such as rain garden cluster projects, or ensure matching funds are available for chasing
grant applications for flow reductions projects. a
IL
Project Benefit 5
'a
The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, improve fish passage and decrease creek bed scour during peak flow v
events. 3:
a
Estimated Project Cost E
E
t
ca
w
w
Design $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $140,00( Q
Right of Way
Construction $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $1,260,00( s
Expense Total $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,400,00(
Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,400,00( Q
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,400,00(
Packet Pg. 105
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 82
The purpose of this project is to improve the environmental health of the creek necessary to support fish habitat, and to
restore the storm water capacity. The project consists of the modifications to three structures that currently prevent fish
passage and are undersized for the flows on the creek, (1) the culvert at the BNSF track, remove and replace with a fish -
friendly culvert or bridge with adequate flow capacity, (2) return flow to the creek between the diversion structure and the
BNSF culvert by blocking the structure and restoring creek capacity and (3) culvert at Talbot Road, remove and replace witl-
fish-friendly culvert or bridge that provides adequate fish passage and storm water flow capacity. This project will increase
the resiliency of the watershed by building the structures that mimic the natural channel performance necessary for fish
habitat and stormwater flow capacity. The project also includes time and effort to research and apply for
supplemental/additional funding sources for construction. Due to the project complexity and number of stakeholders, the
planning and design phase is estimated to be 2-years.
The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and improve fish passage.
$7,636,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$730,000 $500,000
$2,800,000 $3,000,000
$730,000 $3,300,000 $3,000,000
$67,014 $907,704 $750,000
$662,986 $582,697
$1,809,599 $2,250,000
$730,000 $3,300,000 $3,000,000
a
tU
(L
u`
C)
a
d
E
M
Q
c
m
E
M
U
a
Packet Pg. 106
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 83
City of Edmonds and Lynnwood joint project to supplement/update the Perrinville Creek 2015 basin analysis that
determined possible locations for projects that would help decrease the peak storm flows during high rain events. Project
will be updated to reflect projects completed and also determine if there are other locations within the basin to aid in the
reduction of peak flows in the basin.
Improve overall basin and stream health, by using green stormwater infrastructure methods. This will make it so that rainf
is not simply collected and conveyed downstream and instead behaves as close as possible to natural conditions. This
includes infiltrating rainfall runoff as close as possible to where it fell. This will also decrease stream peak flows, which will
decrease stream erosion and improve the overall stream habitat for aquatic life.
$649,200
Design
$594,390
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
$594,390
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$141,000
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
$453,390
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$594,390
a
Packet Pg. 107
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 84
a
v
IL
LL
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
_
L
_
O
y.+
U
Q
L
m
O
m
_
_
a
a_
U
a
LL
U
3.1
Packet Pg. 108
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 85
coco
240th St SW
79th P'
Mathay
Ballinger
Park
fe
a a
0
242nd St SW
240th PI SW
J
W
Q
= 241 st St SW
F—
%O
n
A
Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flooding & seasonal algae blooms along with other water quality impairments. The Q
Highway 99 corridor is an area of high development, including a future City project which will require stormwater
L
mitigation. By creating a regional facility, the City can improve the stormwater mitigation achieved by development, o
addressed stormwater mitigation needs for the future Highway project, and treat runoff from one of the City bigger polluti CO
generating areas. The City can drastically improve Lake Ballinger water quality. The project proposes to implement water •_
_
quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Bal linger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) whic c.
would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, a
park. a-
''
Project Benefit a
LL
C)
The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as
green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhan a
a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park.
d
E
Estimated Project
$3, 200, 000
Q
y-°
_
m
Design $200,000 $200,000 E
Right of Way
Construction $2,800,000 Q
Expense Total $200,000 $3,000,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $200,000 $750,000
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants $2,250,000
Funding Source Total $200,000 $3,000,000
Packet Pg. 109
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 86
The project proposes to purchase an existing single family residential property located within the Lake Ballinger flood plain
The City secured a $500,000 Department of Ecology grant to aid in this process. The home is the lowest property on the lal
and is badly damaged from previous flooding to the point it is generally uninhabitable. It is also nearly undevelopable due
the flood plain and critical area regulations onsite.
The City intends to remove the home and any pollution generating surfaces from the site as part of the initial effort on the
site. The grant has restrictions for allowing this parcel to be used for public use. After demolition of the structures and
impervious surfaces, the planned site use would be for public utility benefit only. Because the City storm drain line for SR-1
cuts through in an easement immediately adjacent to this parcel, the City plans to pursue a future project to split
appropriate flows from the City system and provide water quality treatment to the maximum extent feasible. The future
project would provide water quality treatment for a very heavily trafficked highway (SR-104) and would make significant
improvement in water quality to Lake Ballinger and its downstream course to Lake Washington via McAleer Creek.
Improve the health and water quality of Lake Ballinger by removing hard surfaces and a home that is generally
uninhabitable. Project will also provide a future location to treat stormwater runoff from portions SR-104.
$750,000
Design
Right of Way
$10,000
Construction
$110,000
Expense Total
$120,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$92,500
Secured Grants
$27,500
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$120,000
IL
L)
'a
u_
t)
IL
as
E
r
Q
c
m
E
V
Q
Packet Pg. 110
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 87
2024 CFPICIP vl.8
Annual storm drain replacement/maintenance projects. Projects propose to replace or rehab storm drain infrastructure in
several locations throughout the City. Locations of work identified by City crews and staff via firsthand knowledge or video
inspection results. Much of Edmonds stormwater infrastructure is past its useful lifespan and requires routine replacement
or repair to preserve the function of the storm drain system. Failure to conduct annual maintenance projects will increase
chances of storm drain system failure.
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. a
$1.7 to $2.4 million/year
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Funding Source Total
$354,000 $337,000 $351,000 $365,000 $380,000 $395,000
$1,347,000
$1,687,000
$1,755,000
$1,825,000
$1,898,000
$1,974,000
$1,701,000
$2,024,000
$2,106,000
$2,190,000
$2,278,000
$2,369,000
$1,701,000
$2,024,000
$2,106,000
$2,190,000
$2,278,000
$2,369,000
$1,701,000
$2,024,000
$2,106,000
$2,190,000
$2,278,000
$2,369,000
'a
LL
c�
IL
$8,230,13(
t
c�
$41,129,86_ Q
$49,360,00(
_
$49,360,00(
$49,360,00(
Q
Packet Pg. 112
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 89
Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the
Annual Storm Maintenance Projects.
Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to the Annual Storm Replacement
Projects.
$315,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
I
IF c)
'a
u_
C)
a
$25,000 '
c
$290,000 E
E
$315,000
c�
r
$315,000 Q
c
m
E
$315,000 Q
Packet Pg. 113
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 90
a
v
IL
a_
U
N
O
N
V
N
O
N
_
L
_
O
U
Q
L
m
O
m
_
_
a
a_
U
a
LL
U
3.1
Packet Pg. 114
2024 CFPICIP v1.8 91
WOODWAv
nkt rv�
'. EDMONDS
4
ssswsrsw
u"Woavaut
cou"w
r = MOUNTLAKE
rtsn.u¢e TERRACE
�Y
...in.�.x OdG COIIN7Y 1MN13 W .....
The City of Edmonds (City) owns and operates an extensive system of drainage pipes, ditches, and other assets to convey Q
stormwater runoff into streams, lakes, and Puget Sound to prevent and minimize damage to private property, streets, and ',0
other infrastructure. The City is faced with the challenge of conveying this runoff safely and cost-effectively while preventir o
or minimizing the adverse impacts of high flows (erosion, flooding, and sediment deposition) and of stormwater pollutants a
on water quality and aquatic habitat. In addition, recent state and federal stormwater regulations make it technically and c
financially challenging to address these issues while balancing utility ratepayer costs. To proactively address these challeng
and remain in compliance with the State -mandated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Western Washington a
Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Phase II permit) and other increasing regulatory requirements, the City is a
updating its current comprehensive storm and surface water management plan. This permit has and will continue to have < <?
significant impact on the workload and operational budget of both the Engineering Division and the Storm Crews within the LL
v
Public Works Department. Per the State Department of Ecology, the plan will also include the work findings from their L)
required (stormwater Management Action Plan) SMAP process of City drainage watersheds. Project will also include a
recommendations for stormwater utilities rates to be adjusted at the discretion of Council.
w
Project Benefit
a�
E
s
A holistic summary of the City's Stormwater system with recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance
r
and improvements projects.Estimated Project Cost Q
m
E
t
$733,000
c�
w
Q
Design $350,000
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total $350,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $350,000
Funding Source Total $350,000
Packet Pg. 115
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 92
I r) .
" r
i wr (
\N
Nilk,
14
0 0
O
00
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
0
o O
o
rn
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
o
It
o
0
o
O
o
0
0
0
O O
Ln
C4
CM
M
00
C4
M
O
O
N
CD
CD
OO
CD
OCD
04
U).E!)
O
It
CDO�
00
O
Lf)
N
N
N
N
N
N
6)
(fl
�
V3
V)
V)
VT
V)
V)
V)
-
VT
LO
64
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V> Vi
Vi
Vi
H?
U).
V3
V)
00
Vi
V>
O
00
CA
N
W
N
00
M
LO
60
V)
O 0
O
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O 0
LO
CO
Cl)
Cl)
00
C4
N
O
N
Cfl
O
O
O
O
O
V
V
CDN
V> EA
O
It
Ln
C4
�
00
6)
O
Ln
V)
V3
60
60
60
60
60
60
�
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e»
�
U7
�
e»
�
e»
o
O
O
e»
e»
_
0
C
0
N
Cfl
CA
M
M
N
U7
�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U7
U).
e»
U).
e»
U).
o
o
e»
O
e»
e»
_
C
C
C
rn
L
O)
N
_
N
V
O
N
�
�
EfJ
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
(D
V>
V).
H)
H-T
H)
O
O
V>
V>
O
O
613
_
O
O
O
O
O
O
I-
O
N
V
LC)
O
N
V3
Gs
Cfl
V3
HT
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
V3
V3
V3
U7
O
O
V3
LO7
V)
O
O
V)
_
O
O
O
O
LO
Co
LO
CD
19
r
M
H-T
LC)
V>
O
U7
W
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V3
V>
V3
O
O
Vi
V3
V>
V>
O
V3
V)
_
0
C
C
o
W
Co
LO
!A
N
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
O
o
rn
e»
e»
e»
�
e»
e»
e»
0
_ o
O
O
v_
O
O
LO
Cl)
N
CD
,O
V)
6r3
O
Cl)
LO
N
V9
Vp
V)
_ 06
M V L1j M 00 O O V
c a�
O O O N O O O O O
Co
(6 L
U U U CU) U U U U Cu
f6 f6 f6 N N N f6 N -
Q
3 Cu
N �
u- N N 7u 75 (6 75 (6 N (n
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 !n
a
c c c c c c c c 3 a
0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
U)
(N w w w w w w w w C
N (0 (6 Cu Cu (0 Cu (6 Cu c
oaaaaaaaa M
N Li Q U
r
N
M
le
LA
CO
1.-
00
O
O
r M
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
r r
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a a
2024 CFP/CIP vl.8
94
Co
rn
8.A.b
v
N
M
N
v
LP)
• M
N
O
E9
00
V3
O
O
a)
O
O
O
r
N
N
I--
V)
N
N
r-
V3
Co
O
r
0)
C0
•
O
N
ra
O
N
11
O
0
to
O
o
C
♦2
LL
�
ce
V),
�
C-
Co
N
O
N
o
0
o
N
CD
CDN
_ O
LO
Co
p
N
M
ce
V).
Co
M
60
ai
=
:a
O
O
o
CO
N
O
O
_ O
CO
�
L
4%
O
V)
O
GS
=
0
O
O
00
O
Om Co
Co
y:+
fi
Q
O
O
Co
Co
C
0
0
o
N
6"
Co
m
N
U'
Co
v
a
--
a
�
Csi
�
Cli
U
LL
U
a
t
Q
C
d
E
L
v
m
w
M
• CVO
Q
LL
W
FY
�
�
H
G
Z
W
a
x
W
J
a
0
~
Packet Pg. 117
Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the
Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects.
Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to Sanitary Sewer Replacement
Projects.
Design
$2,000
Right of Way
Construction
$58,000
Expense Total
$60,000
Sewer Fund 423
$60,000
Funding Source Total
$60,000
Packet Pg. 118
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 95
Public Works - Sewer
Phase 10-17 Sewer Replacement (2023-30)
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace pipe and related appurtenances at various
locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase capacity, or more prone to breakage due t
its material properties.
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to
day maintenance costs.
$1.8 to $2.7 million/year
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Funding Source Total
$378,000 $378,000 $393,000 $409,000 $425,000 $442,000
$2,000,000 $2,043,000 $2,125,000 $2,210,000 $2,299,000 $2,391,000
$2,378,000 $2,421,000 $2,518,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000
$2,378,000 $2,421,000 $2,518,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000
$2,378,000 $2,421,000 $2,518,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000
a_
U
a
u_
U
$9,203,67� _
d
E
$49,787,32: o
$58,991,00( Q
$58,991,00(
$58,991,00( E
U
a
Packet Pg. 119
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 96
Public Works - Sewer
Annual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line
existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this
trenchless method.
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to 2
day maintenance costs.
a_
U
Estimated Project Cost
a
u_
$540,000 to $640,000/year
U
a
Design
$81,000
$85,000
$88,000
$92,000
$96,000
$1,996,67� _
Right of Way
E
Construction
$461,000
$480,000
$499,000
$519,000
$540,000
$11,231,32: 0
Expense Total
$542,000
$565,000
$587,000
$611,000
$636,000
$13,228,00( Q
Sewer Fund 423
$542,000
$565,000
$587,000
$611,000
$636,000
$13,228,00(
Funding Source Total
$542,000
$565,000
$587,000
$611,000
$636,000
$13,228,00( E
t
U
is
a
Packet Pg. 120
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 97
tbt'tKAI UL.
-
,evisw .a
Lk -
-
Maple Ln
+T 234th` Si SW
- Q 234th St sW
3
,1Q Madrona Ln
_
Zw
N 236th St SW Q 236th St SW
236th St SN' C
00
�t v
h St SW 238TH ST SW __
t
238th St sw _ a
Ni
Oth St SW 240th St
SW
79th�
a 242nd St SW --
- - sy
-
242nd St SWa a
o
��;a�b
;� •-
CO
F bl
244i-H ST SW
�%S WAY I ea
Lake
Ballinger
232nd St Sv ' 32nd St SW
`232nd St
y
�,t
w
m
in
_.-
in -J
Z
C C
� 235thStSW IV
cOz
235TH pL.SMV
236TH ST SW
Im
w
o
G
LO
Y
En "2 3
u
O m v
_ 0,
c
�
f
s
d
c
c
2a2"d
C
N
c
=
s
LLINGER_WAY-244TH=ST SW ?
c
t
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the sewer pipe along Lak
Ballinger will require additional flow capacity in the near future. These improvements are needed to account for populatio ,t
growth, reduce Infiltration and Inflow from the pipe and improve maintenance and emergency access for this major trunk i
system. a
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, and decrease overall day to day maintenance cost.
Improved access will help ease maintenance and access for emergencies, which will further decease any chance of potenti� v
sewer spills into Lake Ballinger.
a
LL
Estimated Project Cost
?�
a
$7,000,000
'
w
a=i
E
Design
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
s
U
Right of Way
Q
Construction
$5,000,000
Expense Total
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
Sewer Fund 423
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
v
Funding Source Total
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
c*;
Q
Packet Pg. 121
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 98
Public Works -Sewer —M
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 4
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line
existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this
trenchless method.
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to
day maintenance costs.
$522,000
Design
$70,000
Right of Way
Construction
$452,000
Expense Total
$522,000
Sewer Fund 423
$522,000
Funding Source Total
$522,000
(L
L)
'a
u_
c)
IL
d
E
M
c�
r
Q
c
m
E
t
L)
Q
Packet Pg. 122
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 99
MR-2024 CFP/CIP v1,0
so . A(
LLJ
H I S r U K I C A L
-MUSEUM
�.7100
'-�/iy'-'ter•{.�_,•��•' •''• _
rr, M
W
LU
LL
2024 CFP/CIP v1.8
f- O LO (0 N O (0 O M O O 'It It M M O
LO (0 LO O It O ti N M O M � 1 N 00 (0 LO O
(0 (D O c0_ � ti_ O_ _ _ c0 c0 M_ _ O (D L() O I� � L
_ _ _ _ _ _ () O_ O _
f- 00 It N LL) (fl It 0) It M O LL) O LO It LO
M N O M ti M O M N M O N
Efi C0 Efl It N N Efl ER (N 0') r N O LL) M
Efi K> EA EA EA «) " ff3 Efi K> _ Efi Efl El? EA
Ef3 Efi
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
6r} 6q (t} 613 613 Ef3 Ef3 Ef3 603 60i 613 60- (f} 613 613 613 613 Qf3 V-T
Il- r O LO (0 N M (0 O M O r O "T r T M M O
LO It (.0 Ln O NT (0 1- N (0 O 00 Il- r- N Co (0 LO O
(D (C O CO lq � O M M M O (0 Ln O I� � Ln O O
fl- 00 �t N LO (D 't m M O LO r "t r CO LO LO
CO r N r (O ;t M r- M O r M "t N M O r N
Ef3 (.0 E13 It N It N 613 603 N O N r O L) M r r
E1) 6q ea Ef3 Efi H> EH EH 61) - K-} Efi H> 6,3
Efl Ef}
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
Ef3 6f3 Efl Ei3 Efl Efi Efl Efi ER EA Ef3 Ef3 E13 (!? Ei3 Ei3 Efi Efi Efi
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O EA O O O O O O O O EA
O O LO O O O O LL) O O O O O O O O O
r O O LL) LL) O LL) O vi LL) O O O LL) O
Efi 00 Efl 00 (M It N Efi EF? O 6s N N 00 LL) N M
Efi Efi Efl Efi Efl m Efl Efi Efl Ef? Ef? Efi
Gq
Ef3
M 00 CO M r LO LO M M O O O M 00 r r N O O
N 't N CO 't (O (O O O H? LO r N I- N r- M V)
00 (.O O (0 N I- 't r O LO N O 00 W M
Et} M (') r N M (O O Ln O Ln Cfi O
O Ef3 r M N N 6s r M Ef3 N (0 r t N M
r E13 r 613 613 H> Ef3 613 LO 613 613 613
E03 613 613 E03
f� 0) 00 It r- LL) N M O (O O M I O
f� It N cM O f- 00 (D N M Efi It O f- 00 It M N vai
M 0) (0 O LL) f- M (0 O ":t O r ":t M P-
M O LO O O f- 0) It LO � LO LO 0) LL) M
6s f- Efi N (M N (0 Efi Efl It 6s N Efi Lf) f-
6q Efi Efl Efl Efi Efl 6q Efl Efi
Efl Efl
V It M N 00 N M (O O LO O LO O 0) 0) LO O 0) O
(0 0) 00 N �t O N H? O CD T (D r 00 O U)
V O 0) Cc (') cl N LO O M O O CO r M 00 t
00 O (N OD 0) r Ef3 O Cl f- Ln 0) Ln O (') 00
Efl ti Ef3 0) (0 N 0) r LO 6s (N E13 LO OD �t V)
N 613 Ef) N 613 613 60 Ef3 EA Ef) 613
6q Ef)
00 O O O O v O o 0 CD r o 0 0 M o
Nt O fl- O 00 O f- O O O Gq 0) LO N O O f- (N O
O O (7 O N O N O O O O O M O O O O
Nt O N O 0) O (0 O LL) O Il- N O O LO 0) (0 LL)
N 00 6q r q LO M M 't O m M NT N Co 0) N N
Efi U> r Efl Efi Efl 6Ci Efi Efi r 6q N N 60i 613
E13 6Ci bq Efl Efl Efi
C:
'�O
0
N
c
°o
g
u�
L
L
(�:
Co
Q)
Q
C
L
_
E
Cn
Cu
D
m
U
=
2
E
Co
m
D
°�
U
U)
o
Clp
U
L
O
N
_a
00
a)
o
O
U
U
O
O
C
a
N
O
Co
C)
C)
�T
w
O
O
Co
C
C
C
C
N
Co
_
mQ
O
O
O
O
p
L)
E
(n
>p
>
OO
C) C6
0)n6
n6
(6
U
U
(n
4
2
LO
Cl)
(D
M
LD
Co
O
EA
O
Ei?
O
O
O
O
L6
Eli
to
O
CO
CO
Ln
r
EA
LO
00
LC)
O
to
ER
I*
N
CO
CO
O
O
r
Eli
O
11
N
N
LO
LO
64
F8.A.b771
a
N 2
C
(n
(n
(n
O
O
O N
O
a
U
U
Op
a
J
LU
.O
U U
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
2
2
J J d
O
d
d
d
>
LL
Z
W
a.
x
N M
le
LO
LO
ti
CO
O
O
r M
N
M
Ln
w
r-
CO
O
w
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r
r N
-
-
-
-
r
r
r
r
J
LL LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
Q
a. a.
a
a.
a
a
a.
a.
a.
a a
a.
a.
a.
a.
a.
a.
a.
a
Packet Pg. 124
101
8.A.b
0')
r`
It
00
K-T
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
t" )
to
r`
• M
O
Lf)
fl-
0)
Lf)
(M
U0,
Lf)
M
Efl
Lf)
M
EFT
4
It
Il-
M
(.0
c0
6FJ
d?
EA
O
ER
O
ER
O
K)
O
E!)
O
EH
O
EH
O
ER
O
tf}
�
I,-
�
00
H?
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cl)
t0
_
I-
• M
O
Lf)
6)
Lf)
tY)
64
Lf)
M
6q
Lf)
Cl)
EH
4
I--
M
(0
c0
_ r
to
ti
ER
cr
Ef}
a
O
(.09-
O
6c�
O
69-
O
613-
O
Vol
O
61>
O
63
o
ts>
�?
a
LL
U
N
O
N
O
LO
O
LO
O
O
N
N
M
ff?
N
f`
M
O
I
_
Lf)
Lf)
�
:a
L
O
Vy
N
to
LO
O
Efl
O
ff}
O
K}
O
fA
�t
to
N
t0
co
c0
_
ti
6q
OD
O
LO
r
C
Q
E!3
vq-
Q
O
6q
0)
N
O
61)
O
ER
O
Efi
O
K3
(o
Lf')
LO
co
L
to
N
N
�
rn
t0
O
m
Efl
K3
vi
C
to
f.A
I�
00
N
O
O
Ef3
O
Ef3
O
H)
O
Efl
O
O
O
I
N
c0
_
=
_
(14
Lt)
O
LO
N
�'
c0
t0
d
a
69
69
�
U
O
O
_ O
O
f�
O
Gq
O
O
O
O
O
(::
O
O
O
O
V
N
o
It
N
d
LL.
(�
LO
00
LO
LO
Cl)
U>
LO
Cl)
�
LO
Ch
Vy
N
to
co
N
LO
LO
a
�
V)
r
Z
d
E
-ocu
O
m
N
N
a
to
N
_
N
O
0-r
N
_0
M
d
U
(6
L
-O
C
N
'ITLL
�
N
0
E
N
O
C
O
_0
7
LL
.-T.
C
LL
C:
Da
++
CO
CO
O
0
=
a
O
O
"
N
?
m
E
m
U
LL
LL
U
>
O
(n
fn
c
D
W
D
Z
W
W
J
a
H
0
~
Packet Pg. 125
2024 CFP/CIP v1.8
102
This small structure houses the Edmonds Cemetery funerary services and the cemetery Sextant office. The building is in
relatively good condition and has little deferred maintenance backlog. Minor security and communications updates will be
needed as technology dictates.
Projects:
Minor repair and maintenance
- a
tU
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well -maintained facility creates a safe work environmei v
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected a
lifespan. w
a�
Estimated Project Cost
s
$24,048 (2024) r
Q
m
Construction\Professional Services $24,048 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 E
t
Expense Total $24,048 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 w
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $20,000 Q
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$8,414
$4, 048
$24,048 $8,414
$3,377 $818 $1,000
$3,377 $818 $1,000
Packet Pg. 126
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 103
,r,11tilU 11�; (MIY SI'L l
City Hall was built in 1979 and was operated as a private business office center until the City purchased and renovated the
building in the 1990s. The City has operated Edmonds City Hall from this location since the renovations were completed. Th
building is in near original condition and needs substantial repair and maintenance.
Projects: All Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing systems need replacement, Restroom remodels w/gender neutral =
consideration, Center Stairway Code updates and replacement, Lobby remodel, Entry Awning re -glazing, Interior Painting,
ADA accessibility improvements. a
a
Project Benefit U
a
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the v
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well -maintained facility creates a safe work environmei
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance a
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected w
lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
w
r
$80,000 (2024) Q
m
r r E
t
Construction\Professional Services $80,000 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 0
w
Expense Total $80,000 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 Q
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$80,000 $129,064
$150,000
$70,949 $108,628 $80,000
$80,000 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000
Packet Pg. 127
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 104
The Pier was recently renovated and is generally in good condition. The Beach Ranger Office is a 1200 square foot office an
restroom facility located near the east end of the pier. There are season programs and visitor support functions that operas
out of this facility.
Projects: Electrical panel clean up and safety inspection, minor repairs, and maintenance, Beach Ranger Station/restroom
roof replacement.
i
v
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer v
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance 3:
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected a
lifespan.
d
E
Estimated Project
c�
$2,971 (2024) r
Q
c
m
Construction\Professional Services $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 E
Expense Total $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $2,918 Q
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding $2,971 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500
Funding Source Total $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500
Packet Pg. 128
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 105
The Frances Anderson Center serves as the City's main recreation center offering arts, athletic and cultural programing yea
round. Due to the age and high usage of the building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or
restoration.
Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilers with Electric alternatives that will add ventilation, cooling and heating Investment
grade audit approved by City Council, Replacement of all exterior doors scheduled for 2024, ADA accessible door closures,
Plumbing drainage collector, Restroom remodels (w/ gender neutral consideration), Replacement of all plumbing fixtures,
Addition of building security card readers, Building HVAC controls to maximize efficiency, Fire Sprinkler replacement, and
clean building act compliance efforts will be addresses by IGA.)
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.
$110,000 (2024)
Construction\Professional Services
$110,000
$98,892
$20,934
$113,029
$80,000
Expense Total
$110,000
$98,892
$20,934
$113,029
$80,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$110,000
$98,892
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
$20,934
$113,029
$80,000
Funding Source Total
$110,000
$98,892
$20,934
$113,029
$80,000
a
Packet Pg. 129
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 106
Public Works - Facilities
fft Station 16 0
This facility is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue and was built in 2003 and has a building area of 10,70(
square feet. The building is in fair condition and will require some infrastructure updates or replacements to remain
operationally ready for the needs of the City.
Projects: Roll -up Bay door controller replacements, HVAC unit assessment, Gutter replacement, interior coatings updates.
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.
$49,280 (2024)
Construction\Professional Services $49,280 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000
Expense Total $49,280 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $69,388
Unsecured Funding $49,280 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000
Funding Source Total $49,280 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000
M
L)
IL
LL
t)
a
d
E
M
c�
r
Q
c
m
E
M
Q
Packet Pg. 130
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 107
This building is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue, was built in 1999 and has a building area of 9,800
square feet. This building has had some updates but will need some infrastructure upgrades to remain operationally ready
Projects: Bay Door assessment, Electrical infrastructure updates, roof soffit enclosure, interior painting.
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer v
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance a
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected v
lifespan.
IL
ProjectEstimated $50,000 (2024) E
c�
r
Construction\Professional Services $50,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 Q
Expense Total $50,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 0
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $221,922
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding $50,000 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 Q
Funding Source Total $50,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000
Packet Pg. 131
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 108
PVC
6 J
This building is the eldest of the City's three fire stations and is operated by South County Fire and Rescue. This station sery
Esperance and supports the other two fire stations in Edmonds. The building is 6400 square feet and was built in 1990. Th(
building has had significant updates to the exterior envelope and is in need of interior and HVAC system updates.
Projects: interior painting, restroom fixture replacement
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a
U
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmerLL
a
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance v
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.Estimated Project Cost
a
w
E
$36,274 (2024)
�a
w
r
Q
Construction\Professional Services $36,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000
Expense Total $36,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) w
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 Q
Unsecured Funding $36,274
Funding Source Total $36,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000
Packet Pg. 132
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 109
This Historic log cabin is home to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce visitor center, the structure was a purpose built cabi
from the turn of the century. The structure is professionally maintained on a three year cycle by a log cabin specialist and
requires only minor maintenance and upkeep annually.
Projects: new thick cut shingle replacement, chinking of exterior log finish, interior lighting.
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a
tU
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer a
LL
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance v
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.Estimated a
w
Project
E
$30,000 (2024)
�a
w
r
Q
Construction\Professional Services $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 =
m
Expense Total $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $30,000 w
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 Q
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500
Packet Pg. 133
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 110
==L;.A.b
The 110-year-old original Carnegie Library building is home to the Edmonds Museum. The building is on the State of
Washington Historic registry and has been well maintained over the last several years. Buildings of this age require
specialized maintenance and coordination with the state historic architect to maintain the historic status. Structural
stabilization and weatherproofing are the most significant priorities to maintain this facility.
Projects: minor structural reinforcement, entry fagade masonry repair, lower entry restoration
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.
$45,000 (2024)
Construction\Professional Services $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000
Expense Total $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $45,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000
a
Q
Packet Pg. 134
2024 CFP/CIP v1.8 111
The Edmonds Library is operated by the Sno-Isle Library system with exception of the Second floor Plaza room rental space
The library is a 19,000 square foot building built in 1982. The building hosts special event rentals and daily Library
programming and community services. This is one of the City's most heavily used buildings by the public and has significant
deferred maintenance needs, including the building fagade and plaza deck waterproofing.
Projects: window replacement, ADA access device upgrades or replacement, gender inclusive public restroom creation, Pla
Room restroom/changing facilities, Plaza Room A/V installation, building masonry restoration or building cladding, exterior a
stairway restoration, HVAC ventilation fan assessment, building breezeway remodel, flood damage restoration, and plaza a
level green roof now on CIP. U
a
u_
Project Benefit U
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer w
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance E
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected s
lifespan. w
r
a
estimated rrolect cost F$100,000
Proiect Cost 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030-4
:�
Construction\Professional Services $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000
Expense Total $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $100,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $53,325 $45,038 $35,000
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000
Packet Pg. 135
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 112
MR
This 4000 square foot facility was built in 1965 as a community theater facility and later was transformed into the
Meadowdale community club house. The building is currently owned and maintained by the City of Edmonds and houses tl
City operated Meadowdale pre-school and the 1500 square foot Meadowdale club house rental facility. This facility while
dated has been well maintained and only requires minor maintenance and repairs.
Projects: minor maintenance and repairs, interior flooring and painting, and bath fixture replacement.
- a
tU
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer v
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected a
lifespan. w
a�
Estimated Project Cost
s
$97,091 (2024) r
Q
m
Construction\Professional Services $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 E
t
Expense Total $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 w
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Q
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000
Unsecured Funding $97,091
Funding Source Total $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000
Packet Pg. 136
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 113
This facility was built in 1965 to house the City's Public Works Department, the building was converted in 1995 to tenant
space and City storage, as well as Edmonds Police large evidence storage. This is a vital piece of property adjacent to the
Waste Water Treatment Plant, and could be converted for utility use if regulatory requirements dictate. Building is primaril
used as storage and will need some updates to maintain current operational readiness.
Projects: HVAC updates, roll -up door replacement, security camera system.
v
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer v
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance 3:
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected a
lifespan.
d
E
Estimated Project
c�
$132,051 (2024) r
Q
r
� m
Construction\Professional Services $132,051 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 E
Expense Total $132,051 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Q
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$132,051 $25,000
$132,051 $25,000
$25,000 $24,519 $25,000
$25,000 $24,519 $25,000
Packet Pg. 137
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 114
8.A.b
This facility was built in 1967 by Ed Huntley who at the time was the City Facilities supervisor. The 4800 square foot facility
now houses all City Facility Operations staff(11) and all of Park and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+ seasonal help) This
Facility is home to the City Carpentry Shop, Key Shop, City Flower program, Parks engine repair shop and Parks and Facilitie
maintenance supply storage as well as Parks and Facilities Manager offices. This Facility is near end of life and is undersized
to support the departmental staffing that are assigned to this facility.
Projects: maintenance and repair to maintain operational capacity, ADA restroom updates, shop floor replacement, Pine St
facility exit, exterior painting.
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.
$40,320 (2024)
Construction\Professional Services
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
Expense Total
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$25,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$9,349
Unsecured Funding
$15,320
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
Funding Source Total
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
a
Packet Pg. 138
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 115
The Public Safety building houses Edmonds Police Department, Edmonds Municipal Court and the City Council Chambers.
The building was built in 1999 encompassing 30,000 square feet of office, court and municipal government uses. The buildi
houses one of the City emergency operations centers, large police training, simulator facilities and evidence processing anc
storage. The building has had minimal system updates over it's life and has a significant amount of deferred maintenance
and should be retrofitted with new fire sprinklers.
Projects: air handler and outdoor ventilation unit replacements, new solar plant installation, parking lot reconfiguration to a
meet current usage, fire sprinkler installation, interior hallway renovation and painting, sleeping room remodel and gender a
specific/neutral accommodations, gender inclusive public restrooms, operable windows is specific locations, courts flat roo a
replacement. v
Project Benefit a
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the w
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer E
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance s
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected w
r
lifespan.Estimated Project Cost Q
m
E
t
$220,000 (2024) w
Q
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$220,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000
$220,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000
$140,000
$55,169 $151,481
$80,000
$515,071
$220,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071
$80,000
$80,000
Packet Pg. 139
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 116
8.A.b
This building built in 1995 houses four Public Works divisions and the auxiliary City Emergency Operations Center. This
building is 28,000 square feet and is capable of operations 24/7 during weather emergencies and natural disasters. The
building has significant deferred maintenance needs and infrastructure updates.
Projects: vehicle yard leveling, HVAC unit replacements, roof system for material bunkers, ventilation fan replacements, firs
alarm system replacement, lobby remodel, restroom remodel with gender inclusivity considerations, electric vehicle
charging and maintenance infrastructure, emergency communications updates, interior hallway flooring thresholds, utility a
bay HVAC replacement, water main replacement (building connection). a
tU
a
u_
tU
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the �
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer a
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance w
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan. s
�a
Estimated Proiect Cost
w
a
$285,000 (2024)
E
2029 2030-4,i.'t
M
Construction\Professional Services $285,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 Q
Expense Total
$285,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$35,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
General Fund
Water Fund 421
$35,000
Stormwater Fund 422
$35,000
Sewer Fund 423
$35,000
Unsecured Funding
$145,000
Funding Source Total
$285,000
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8
$80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000
$80,315
$79,348 $43,821 $50,000
$80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000
117
Packet Pg. 140
This community theater was built by the Driftwood Players theater group in 1967 and was deeded to City ownership at a
later date. The facility is 6,300 square feet in size and houses the Driftwood Players theatrical performances and City
meetings. The City's maintenance responsibilities are limited to large infrastructure, parking lot, roofing, and grounds.
Projects: parking lot repair and recoating, minor repair, and maintenance.
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a
tU
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer ('L
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance L)
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected a
lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
a�
E
$99,077 (2024) s
�a
w
r
Q
Construction\Professional Services $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 a=i
Expense Total $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000
v
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $43,880 Q
Unsecured Funding $99,077 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000
Funding Source Total $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000
Packet Pg. 141
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 118
8.A.b
This recreational facility houses the City's aquatic programing and some Parks and Recreation programs. Built in 1971 the
pool house historically was only operated seasonally. The tenant run aquatic programing is currently expanding to year
round lap and team aquatic activities and will continue to support summer open swim programing. The facility requires
minimal maintenance to remain operational and is subject to tenant lease terms of use.
Projects: security updates, roof replacement, gutter replacement, plumbing fixture updates, exterior door replacements,
operational repair and maintenance to accommodate 365 operations. a
a
Project Benefit tU
a
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the v
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance a
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected w
lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
w
r
$26,128 (2024) Q
m
2029 2030-4".'E
t
Construction\Professional Services $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 0
w
Expense Total $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 Q
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$8,409
$26,128 $19,127
$26,128 $8,409 $19,127
$30,389 $30,000
$30,389 $30,000
Packet Pg. 142
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 119
All fire and life safety systems are required to be monitored 24/7 in case of emergency. Previously this monitoring has beer
done by traditional phone lines (POTS). This infrastructure is aging in place and is not required to be maintained by the
telecommunications providers as of 2020. In 2022 we have had 3 catastrophic communications failures that resulted sever;
thousand dollars expense and lack of compliance with fire code. The City has eleven facilities with life safety monitoring, ar
six locations with elevators, making a total of 17 locations with monitoring requirements that will need to be updated.
Maintaining and updating aging infrastructure allows the City to continue to operate older buildings by staying compliant a
with fire code and L&I regulations. a
u_
Estimated Project Cost
$125,000
UiIIIIIIIIIIIIIII E
Construction\Professional Services $125,000
U
Expense Total $125,000
Q
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
_
E
Unsecured Funding $125,000
Funding Source Total $125,000
Q
Packet Pg. 143
2024 CFPICIP 0.8 120
The Library Plaza Deck is essentially a green roof on the second floor of the Edmonds Sno-Isle Library. The deck surface was
waterproofed and remodeled in 2003, since that project continuous water intrusion has occurred through the waterproof
membrane. This water intrusion has been successfully mitigated over the years and has not been deemed a project of
significance previously. In 2018 Western Specialty Contractors inspected the water intrusion and offered an initial ROM
price to demolish and waterproof the existing plaza deck. Rebuilding the plaza deck and replacement of landscape, planter!
grass, pavement, flashing and hand railings would be a separate construction project. The Parks Director in 2018 offered ar
estimate to replace landscaping and irrigations systems. In 2021 a draft structural report was performed by MLA Engineerir
to discover any structural consequences from the years of water intrusion, building was deemed structurally sound and
water intrusion not factoring in to building structural stability.
Maintaining building in operational and safe condition, in order to maintain partnership with Sno-Isle Library system.
Preservation of the City's physical assets in appropriate condition vs. the age of the facility and historic capital investment
$4,900,000
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
a
Packet Pg. 144
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 121
� - _ Packet Pg. 145
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C
O O O O O O OLO CD O OLO CD X)
� O� LO 00 OM I- O O O CO
M 69 (fl (fl (f) (fl Ef3 GG (f3
N V
EA 69
O
O
O
O
LO
M
Co
O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O
CD CD LOO O LOO O LO O OCD LO
LO O I-
�
L E»
Co
O
0
O
0
LO
N
O O o
0 0 0
O O O
LO 00 �
N O m
O
EA N
(0
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O N
� O
0 0 0 0
O O O O
O O O O
O LO LO LO
(A3 (A3 EFT (A3
0 0 0 0
O O O O
0 0 0 0
Lo
LO I- N O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LO LO Cl)M L2 N (fl
64 � � � 64
O
N
E
O
_O
O
7
0
=
O
O
0
E
U7
a
U
0
a)
0)
-O
@
U
Q
U
N
�
U
U
Q
Q
N
@
O
E
0
Co
m
a
c
0.
a
a
u
U
CL
U
N
M
7
7
>
O
o
E
m
N
n
-00
-
-[
i
m
Q
g
Q O
U
U
O E
0
v
Z)
Cu
C
a
i
�
(D
(�i
w
0
Cu
E
.c
O s
a
U
z
(D
Q
>
a
a
O
Q 0
r N a Co 0) O N Cl) T
O O O O O
a a a a a a a a a a
0
0
0
LO
N
00
0)
(O
(H
O
O
O
O
N
ti
00
E9
O
O
O
LO
0
LO
N
E9
O
0
0
0
W
N
0
0
O
LO
N
O
1
N
E9
0
O
O
O
N
N
N
O
0
O
O
N
W
0
0
0
Ln
It
N
fa
�2_ LLo m m
V O M
V 00 (.O (4
Co V 1( ? NO
LO O (O
M EA
EA EA EA
N I) N U)
M M
M Cl) 0)
N
LO M I�
O V M
m 0000 N_
O O O O
v m NV) v
rn Oo v_ oc
0 0 Ct
CG
I- N I- N
oc�Iq oc
� 0)(fl 00
(+m 00 0 _
(O N N
613 (Al (A (Al
0000 M_ M N_
M LO O N
00 o_ 1- iN
O O LO O
O LO Cl) N
A (f3 (f3
EA EA
l0 Ln Ln Ln
00 O 00 O
N M (O (O
I� � LO O
O �
EA
Ln
O 00 (O Ul)
CO ) � 0M �
(Al (Al (Al (A
LO C o
M (O V LO
v ((D o Co
N In 't N
� (64 (1-1
(Al
Co O Co
rn O Lr v_
L) v 00
Co
M (O -;t N
(11) (1) (10,
(Al
0
L)
lf')
o
O '
U
O
117 N
(.j o
N 0
cyj v 3 0
m
C N U)
D rn
w
3 c
a)
(n ~ N O
> s
� (Y6 U U)0 CL
-
E E
21,
w 2 O U
0
8.A.b
O
O
N
N
00
0)
CD
ER
W
O
O
O
O
LO
ti
O
E9
O
O
O
Ln
LO
o
L
IL_
U_
a
U
N
�
N
O
N
o
o
O
N
t0
�
N
O
N
ai
_
O
O
O
O
R
Co
LO
N
N
=
0
++
a
O
O
O
O
N
O
L
CU
m
ER
O
o
o
LO
�
=
�a
a
a
N
ER
o
o
0
d
U
a
LL
U
o
N
to
N
ER
a
L
r
_
t
V
r
Q
_
G>
L
t�
yam.+
Q
w
Z
LU
w
a
J
H
O
Packet Pg. 146
2024 CFP/CIP v1.8 123
The WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In -House Projects is intended to maintain infrastructure and equipment to ensure
that the treatment plant is well maintained.
This project ensures that critical infrastructure is maintained and equipment is replaced in order to reduce risk to the City
$500,000 (2024)
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
a_
U
a
a
U
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$200,000
$250,000
$250,000
$3,750,00( a
$400,000
$400,000
$400,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$15,000,00( c
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,250,000
$1,250,000
a�
$18,750,00( E
$253,950
$253,950
$253,950
$507,900
$634,875
$634,875
s
$9,523,12�
$115,850
$115,850
$115,850
$231,700
$289,625
$289,625
w
$4,344,37` Q
$82,750
$82,750
$82,750
$165,500
$206,875
$206,875
$3,103,12� _
$47,450
$47,450
$47,450
$94,900
$118,625
$118,625
m
$1,779,37` E
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,250,000
$1,250,000
t
$18,750,00(
w
Q
Packet Pg. 147
2024 CFP/CIP v1.8 124
To cover any carryover or close-out costs associated with the Carbon Recovery Project that occur in FY 2024.
To complete and close out all items associated with the Carbon Recovery Project.
$500,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
$500,000
Expense Total
$500,000
Sewer Fund 423
$253,950
Mountlake Terrace
$115,850
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$82,750
City of Shoreline
$47,450
Funding Source Total
$500,000
Packet Pg. 148
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 125
Public
Works
-
Treatment
Plant
roject
The WA Dept of Ecology has imposed the Puget Sound Nutrient General Permit upon us. It is anticipated that our current
process will not be able to meet these new permit requirements. This decision package will allow us to team with an
engineering firm to study our current process and design a solution that will allow our plant to meet the new PSNGP
requirements as well as accommodate projected service area growth over the next decade.
To meet new permit requirements and increase capacity for projected 20-year service area expansion.
$41,850,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
a
U
a
u_
U
2029
2030-40.a
$350,000
$750,000
$750,000
c
d
E
$20,000,000 $20,000,000
$350,000
$750,000
$750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000
Q
$177,765
$380,925
$380,925 $10,158,000 $10,158,000
$81,095
$173,775
$173,775 $4,634,000 $4,634,000
E
$57,925
$124,125
$124,125 $3,310,000 $3,310,000
$33,215
$71,175
$71,175 $1,898,000 $1,898,000
Q
$350,000 $750,000 $750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000
Packet Pg. 149
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 126
.1N
This allows the ability to continue production of class A solids if/when the gasification system is shut down for repairs or
preventative maintenance. The ability to produce and haul class A solids will eliminate a temporary but substantial cost
increase hauling as this product is essentially the same in volume as biochar or concentrated minerals and is accepted at th
local transfer station whereas if this option is not available, sludge will need to be loaded into trailers and hauled to Oregor
as was done during the Carbon Recovery Project at a cost of up to $200,000 per month. This redundant solids processing
mode was an option to add to the Carbon Recovery Project and was rejected by previous administration. Along with the
savings in hauling costs, there will be no additional odor issues or daily sludge truck traffic in the adjacent neighborhood.
a
Allow solids handling system redundancy and the ability to run the dryer unit independently in the event of a gasification
system failure or repair. The dryer is capable of producing Class A biosolids, which would negate the need for temporary
hauling and disposal of wet cake at a rate of up to $200,000/month.
$300,000
Design
$50,000
Right of Way
Construction
$250,000
Expense Total
$300,000
Sewer Fund 423
$152,370
Mountlake Terrace
$69,510
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$49,650
City of Shoreline
$28,470
Funding Source Total
$300,000
Packet Pg. 150
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 127
Work with engineering firm to develop a comprehensive asset management system which includes an asset condition
assessment as well as asset criticality ranking. This will allow the WWTP to develop a 5 and 10 year asset repair and
replacement and CIP schedule which will improve overall plant reliability.
Develop a short and long term plan to improve plant reliability by ranking critical assets and creating a capital improvemen
plan. As the majority of this facility is coming to the end of its useful life, the planned replacement/repair of failing
equipment and structures will be much more cost effective than replacing upon failure and ensure that the plant maintains
its ability to meet discharge permit requirements. This will also be valuable in future rate studies.
$150,000
Design
$150,000
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
$150,000
Sewer Fund 423
$76,185
Mountlake Terrace
$34,755
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$24,825
City of Shoreline
$14,235
Funding Source Total
$150,000
a_
U
Q
Packet Pg. 151
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 128
a it
The WWTP has several VFD's (variable frequency drives) on various critical equipment influent pumps, effluent pumps,
RAS/WAS pumps, aeration blowers, etc. These VFD's have an expected useful life of 15-20 years. Several of the VFD's here
at the plant range in age between 20-30 years old. There have already bees some failures and replacements made. These
outdated VFD's need to be replaced to avoid a catastrophic failure event that could happen to these weakened state VFD's
for any number of reasons, including abrupt starting and stopping due to power bumps/loss, switching from grid to
generator power supply or just a parts failure. If multiple critical components fail simultaneously, then the plant may lose it
ability to treat wastewater that meets NPDES permit requirements resulting in pollution of our receiving waters and possib
fines by our governing agency.
To keep critical equipment reliable and in working condition.
$250,000 (2024)
Design
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
Right of Way
Construction
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
Expense Total
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
Sewer Fund 423
$126,975
$126,975
$126,975
Mountlake Terrace
$57,925
$57,925
$57,925
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$41,375
$41,375
$41,375
City of Shoreline
$23,725
$23,725
$23,725
Funding Source Total
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
a
Packet Pg. 152
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 129
Primary Clarifier #2 cage, center column, feedwell, corner sweeps, weir, counterweight, skimming device and rake arms ne
replacement due to severe corrosion. The steel has not been replaced since the original construction. The limited access wi
require that pieces be assembled inside the tank. The concrete structure also needs to be inspected and repaired as neede
as corrosion of the concrete in spots has led to exposed rebar and may have compromised the structural integrity of the
clarifier.
Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is in a state of imminent failure. Ensure WWTP's ability to treat wastewate
up to its rated capacity and meet discharge permit requirements.
$600,000
Design
$100,000
Right of Way
Construction
$500,000
Expense Total
$600,000
Sewer Fund 423
$304,740
Mountlake Terrace
$139,020
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$99,300
City of Shoreline
$56,940
Funding Source Total
$600,000
a
Packet Pg. 153
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 130
Primary Clarifier #3 (dual drive) cages, center columns, feedwells, corner sweeps, weirs, counterweights, skimming devices
and rake arms need replacement due to severe corrosion. The steel is in a highly corrosive environment and has not been
replaced since the original construction approximately 30 years ago. The limited access will require that pieces be assembl(
inside the tank. The concrete structure also needs to be inspected and repaired as needed as corrosion of the concrete in
spots has led to exposed rebar and may have compromised the structural integrity of the clarifier.
Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is approaching a state of imminent failure. Ensure WWTP's ability to treat
wastewater up to its rated capacity and meet discharge permit requirements.
$950,000
Design
$150,000
Right of Way
Construction
$800,000
Expense Total
$950,000
Sewer Fund 423
$482,505
Mountlake Terrace
$220,115
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$157,225
City of Shoreline
$90,155
Funding Source Total
$950,000
a
U
a
LL
U
3.1
w
a�
E
s
�a
Q
_
m
E
t
v
c�
Q
Packet Pg. 154
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 131
The ODS pumps are over 30 years old and are at the end of their useful life. The maintenance, reliability and efficiency of t
primary sludge pumping system would be greatly improved by replacing the current diaphragm pumps with progressive
cavity pumps. During this pump replacement, piping modifications would also be done to allow pumps to support more th
one clarifier, improving system redundancy along with reliability.
Improve reliability, redundancy and efficiency of the primary sludge and scum pumps by replacing 30+ year old pumps and
improving piping system.
$600,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
$100,000
$250,000
$250,000
$350,000
$250,000
$177,765
$126,975
$81,095
$57,925
$57,925
$41,375
$33,215
$23,725
$350,000
$250,000
(L
Q
Packet Pg. 155
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 132
Replace two gate valves and actuators at the inlets of the two chlorine contact channels. These gates have repeatedly
failed. Repair is often expensive and time consuming, as access is an issue, so it is necessary to rent scaffolding and other
equipment to make repairs. When a gate fails, it effectively cuts the disinfection capacity of the plant in half. These are
critical pieces of equipment and need to be replaced with a different technology to improve performance and reliability.
To replace problematic, yet critical valves with more reliable technology that helps to ensure disinfection system
functionality and the ability to continue to meet NPDES discharge permit requirements.
$375,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
$75,000
$300,000
$375,000
$190,463
$86,888
$62,062
$35,587
$375,000
Packet Pg. 156
2024 CFP/CIP 0.8 133
2024 CFPICIP v1.8
134
8.A.b
ON
ii
9
LL
W
Co
W
0
Q.
ui
�
c
m
E
E
O
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Q)
@
O
(ll
(V
U
(V
U
(U
U
U
Q
N
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
L
N
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
E
c
-
(v
0
ca
(a
m
ca
(v
Cn
LO
N
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
0
0
0
3
E
o
f
Cn
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
QQ
Q
0
Q)U
(U
U
Q
U
N
Co
C
E0
C
O
C
O
C
O
U)
-O
Q
Q)L
L
L
L
L
L
L
.�
'�
'M
cl)L
Q)
N
W
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
Q
Q
Q
O
_
L
0
-
E
0
0
0
C
C
C
Q)
MO
(U
O
Q)
-
L
L
L
O
L
L
Q
L
L
(n
L
O
L
(n
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
.N
(n
N
O
O
O
N
OU
O
O
O
O
Cn
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
0
C)U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Q)
L
Q)
L
N
L
CU
Q)
L
Q)
L
Q)
L
Q)
L
CD
N
L
(U
L
fll
L
0
L
0
L
0
L
0
L
0
L
C
C
C
Z")
7
7
7
C
m
m
m
Q)
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
c
(D
o
E
c
CD
m
CD
Cn
Cn
Q)
E
Co
CD_
It
N
O_
O
O
L
CD
N
CO
O
Q)
(n
-0
C)
C
Q
C
0
U
m
`�
0
E
Q
CL6
CY
L
T
U
d
>
>
c
N
>
0
O
E
0
O
cn-0
U
(��
O
0
Q
U'
Cn
o
cn
O
0
O
0
0
m
Q
cL
cL
�_
O
O
N
E
N
N
Q) O
Q
Cn
0
L
0
N
d
C
C)m
E
/ N
�
N
C6CZ
U
Q
L
L
vJ
O
c�
>,N
L
Q
E
O
N
L
C)
C12
Co
0
0
L
�
y
�
U
U
C
C
U)
LL
>
C)
0
O
0
U)
D
c
a_
m
U)
U)
m
Q'-
cis
E
M
E
>,
L
U
O
N
CDC
CD
Q
N
C
m
U
C�6
N
Q
N
U
CD
_U
d
d
C:)CD
Q
CD
0
N
Q
-
L
U_
C
o
N
N
M
U
N
U
Cp
Q)
U
(n
m
z;--
Cn
Cn
Q
N
a_
U
0
m
Q
O
C
.L
d
U
w
0
F-
d
U
C
C
C
O
O
O
a)
a)
a)
wwdwdwd
•
Q
Q
Q
Q)
C
C
C
>
>
�E
/'1
�E
/'1
/)
VJ
O
L
O
L
(6
L
I—
I—
I—
N
0
N
0
M
0
N
Z
CL
2
0
aIL
U
LL
U
Cl)
m
CO
O
O
CD
N
N
N
a)
CU
N
(B
(0
C
C
C
N
N
a)
a2
t
t
Q
Q
a
-0
-0
70
-0
E
E
0
E
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
U
0
-
O
U
E
0.0
E
E
E
E
0
0
U
°
U
U
U
U
(0
E
N
O
O
U
O
2
T
-O
O
T
^0
N
(0
O
Q
cn
>
E
>
O
L
a
O
�
L
0O
>
(�
/c�
)
L
0
C
Q
L
O
J
0
�_
E
C
•
L
+
O
N
•j
(0
L
O
fll
• Ch
L
-0
�jT
CO
C
C
Cn
(')
N
CDC`')
Q)
d
U
C
Q
CO
CD
N
NN
m
N
N
CD
_
N
O
U
N
L
C
C
C
C
0
0
o
O
L
L
L
L
L
CU
L
CU
E
LO
_
O
Q
U
O
Q
U
O
Q
U
O
Q
U
L
Co
C
C
C
C
>
>
Cn
O
L
(0
L
O
L
(0
L
I-HHH
2024 CFP/CIP vl.8 135
Packet Pg. 158
8.A.b
>
>
>
E
E
E
0
a)
a)
•
N
N
N
O
O
O
'
N
N
N
N
N
N
ON
N
N
C
C
C
a
a
a
C
C
C
-0-0
a
co
m
co
U
U
U
0
0
O
O
O
0
0
0
_
0
co
CO
m
Q
a)a)
(D
0
0
X
25
JID
O
O
O
U
U
U)c�
U
U
U
�
M
0
Co
0
O
N
C
C
a
O
0
0
Q
U
CO
}'
=
-
C
0
0
L
0
.-
L
C2
0
co
-0
L
C
0
n
U
N
U
L
(V
L L
O
>
co
VJ
L
00
LLJ
Y
L
0
• CO
�
Y
E
O
(a
'
�`�^�
VJ
0
O
/^c'o
I..L
• 0
Y
U
Q
U
CA
0
IL
U
(Cf
_
d
U
N
N
T
rL^
`L^^
U-
U-
N p
W
Z ti
O'
ch
Q W
a0
� a
I -A
1A
mwmmcotirI-
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
wC*ao
N
N
N
-�
I-
Nt
rnmmCom
N
N
N
N
N
mcom
N
N
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
Cl
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
f-�
N
M
N
M
N
I-�
N
ti
N
4
N
4
N
P-�
N
ti
N
r�.
N
O
CO
O
CO
M
N
CD
N
I.
N
r,�
N
N
rl�
N
rl�
N
rl�
N
pp
N
cp
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
O
+-.
O
+-.
O
.-
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
I.-
r-
0
0
0
f�
N
I�
N
OO
N
c0
N
r�
N
c0
N
c0
N
I-
N
Cfl
N
Cn
N
I-
N
�
N
ti
N�'It
M
m
[I-
N
C 0
N
(D
N
C 0
N
ti
N
M
N
O
N
O
N
o0
N
I�
N
00
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
1
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
O
O
N
C)O
N
N
O
O
O
CD
N
N
N
N
N
co
N
(D
N
M
N
M
N
CD
N
Cfl
N
CO
N
O
N
O
N
O
-
r-
N
ti
N
CO
N
CD
N
CD
N
Cfl
N
CD
N
Cfl
N
Cfl
N
Cfl
N
ti
N
C`
N
ti
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
CO
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
O
O
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
N
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
N
N
N
O
L
O
L
O
L
L
O
O
L
O
L
O
L
O
L
O
L
O
L
O
L
O
L
E
O
L
0
L
0
L
0
L
0
L
0
L
0
L
w
0
L
0
L
w
0
L
O
O
O
a
a
-0-0
-0-0
-0-0
-0-0
-0-0
OL
a
-0-0-0-0
-0-0-0-0-0
N
N
N
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0�
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
0
>
E
E
E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0(D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E>
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
wr
�
_
O
a�aaaaaa-0aa"0-0-0-0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
E-0-0-070aaaaaa
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>>>0
.Cn
U
U
U
U
U
U
D
U
Dw
T
.N
w
DU
rn
Cn
rn
Cn
Cn
O
E
O
E
O
E
>
c
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
c
L
O
U
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
>
0
L
•O
U
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
�.
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
-0
Cn
C:
O
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
N
in
in
in
in
in
in
fn
in
fn
in
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
N
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
C:
L
M
U>
>
O
a
0
0
OL
Q
U
E
>Or-
C
O
+U-.
C
C
0
C
0>
0
O
r
ti
CO
co
fn
c>
U)�
0
>
--
�
-
0
E
0
OaQ
L
U
>
Q
L
C1
U)
U
C
E
sZ
>
0>
0>>
OL
0
a
E
U)
O
L
M
(CO)
E
L
a
O
O
N
(D
Cn
0
_,
U
_
U
O>
0
0
E
N
C2
O
O
C2
C
Cw
N
O
N>
O
O
f�
N
O
N
N
U
co
L
o0
0
O
c
O
O
L
Q
0
0
E
Q
E
E
E
.0
U
.L
c
ai
>
Q
0>>>>
0»
O
O
vJ
0
�p
�0
M
L
SZ
N
0)
C2
a
L
C
U
O
++
(o
O
O
C
0
.0
0
((n
0
0
�_
�_
>
>
c
0
(A
0
7
O
CV
O
U
a)
LLJ
�_
>
.m
N
([S
m
CO
CLo
L
0
L
_0
��
O
co
(n
U
cn
Q
L
U)
O
Cn
a
C
2)
CA
_0
N
0
(B
a)
i
C:
1
E
0)�
i
0>
O
E
C=
O
--
w
N
CD
2
L
O
cl
CAODU
>
>
O
C
0
C:
OaNN�
E
O
oN�
>O�
C-606Q
�U)U)
>>
>U)
>'g
E
E�
0
�N
c
• O
• ICSI
`l
co
V
2
C
0
C
Q
U
8D
(D
>
U
0
>
0
>
U>
0=
Q
V
U)
�
O
0
E
O
>,
co
N
>
co
O
L
Z
•
0
0
C�
0
M
N
M
N
co
\
Q
L
O
Q
Co
Q
L
CL
Cn
-
Q
CO
rl-=
In
CO
>
(tf
2:
(6
�
N>0
Yi
Y
(6
>,
([f
CO
��11
L
v
CoC6
�
2i
0
j
N
N
V
V
0
�1
N
0
U)
�j
>
>
NCO0
/O�`
V
��1
>
L
L
C
U
It
O
O
't
0
It
0
a)Cn
a>>
>
>
>�
7
C
(n
O
coo
>'
>
CO
(6
>
����'Q
U
N
M
In
>
QQ
>
>�CD
(0
N
[L
V
N22��a
Cn
U)
U)
E
NU)
Q
N
Q
co
LOO
LO
ti
O
CD
M
In
co
co
co
N
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
C
0
0
0-
0
Q
0
0-
0
O_
0
Q
0
Q
0
Q
0
O_
0
Q
0
0-
0
0-
0
0-
0
0_
0
0-
0
Q
0
a
0
Q
0
a
0
Q
0
a
0
C1
0
a
0
C1
0
0-
0
0-
0
Q
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
I-
Packet Pg. 159
2024 CFP/CIP v1.8 136
8.A.b
N
N
N
O
O
O
1
ti
r- 1
1
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
C)co
N
0
0
O
NO
N
Q
O
C)
O
�
(D
>
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cfl
CO
co
LO
ON
p
(1)
(n
(1)
(n
0
(n
(1)
(n
(1)
(n
(1)
(n
(1)
(n
(1)
(n
(1)
to
a)
(n
(1)
Mn
a)
a)
(n
a)
(n
a)
(n
a)
(n
a)
(n
()
(n
a)
(n
a)
(n
C)
C)
C)
C)V)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
N
N
N
N
N
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
E
E
E
N
C)C)O
N
ON
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OC3�O
O
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
O
)
N
N
N
cn
I
N
C)O
N
N
O
N
CD
N
N
CD
N
CD
N
CD
N
CD
N
C)
N
CD
N
N
O
N
C)O
N
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
C)
• -Q
-Q
O
O
N
�.�F>
O
N
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
N
1
>>
>
U
C)
y
N
N
L
O
N
Nt
ItIt
It
It
It
It
ItIt
Nt
qt
Nt
qt
U
N
O
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0
0
0
0)
oN
—
cm
E
C)0000000000000000000
p
NO
p
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
U
L
M
E
O
0
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
N
-
Lo
a)
(n
(n
•>
•cn
O
cn
4O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
>
>>
O
C
M
O
7
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
C
C
C
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
C
7
a)
L
a)
L
o
a)
L
a)
L
U
C
O
�}
N
(n
4--
������
7
4--
7
4--
7
4--w���
7
L-
L-����
CD-a0a
N
O
c
a
_0
C
_0
C
70
C
_0
C
70
C
_0
C
70
c
_0
C
_0
c
_0
C
_0
C
_0
C
-a
C
_0
C
-a
C
_0
C
-a
C
_0
C
-a
C
_0
C
C
C
C)
C
C
(D
O
C:)
O
C
.-
(0
m
m
m
m
N
m
N
(o
co
co
co
co
co
ca
ca
co
cu
co
co
Q
O
cu
(n
(n
n
(n
(n
(n
n
n
(
n
(
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
nE
cu
O
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
r
L
CL
(n
>
U
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
U
L
(6
m
(6
6
(6
(�
m
m
m
cu(B
O
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(n
>
(n
(n
'a
-Q
>
>
O
(n
ppO�/X/��/X_�XX_XXXXXXXX_XX_XX_XX_X
(n
(n1O
dm
C!J
VJ
V/
VJ
n
VJ
/'1
VJ
/Y
VJ
C!J
VJ
V/
VJ
V/
VJ
C!J
VJ
V/
L
O
CO
0)
>
.0
C
N
(n
O
E
U
D
C
O
p
O
N
N
—"
N
C
CB
�
O
U)
U)
o
_
2
a
o
U
_
C
��.
o
D
O-
U
"O
�
C
p
CO
o>
>
Q
N
(n
Cn
0
OL
a)
o
C
N
"O
Q
a)
>
L
(n
C
a)
"
a)
�
L
�
a)
�
L
C
a�
U
C
�
O
�_
2
L
Q
d
Q
c6
m
06
a)
.2)
a)
o
a�
U
co
r�
0�-0
C
�
O
O
2
W
L
�
00
°�
�
a)
N
(n
0
a)
Q
O
>i
—
(�
C
N
U
(>>B
o
O
T
O
U
CO
O
O
"/
LL
C
L
>,
U
O
L
>
7
w
C
C
O
C
O
7
>,
>
_7
>
U
C
4
M
y~_
C
00
U.
.--�
L
n
�/�
O
O
m
=
i
L
.O
++
p
O
c
c
L
Y
U
1
L
(n
0
O
M
7
U
a_�
E
U
a)
m
co
m
U
J
a�
N
C
U_
O
L
O
N-
Cn
i
(D
m
d
u
a)
U
MMO
C
Q
(n
(n
(n
_U
L
co
U_
0
N
"O
C
>
co
O
d
_�
• J
Y
E-
—
O
N
>l
O
U
Q
W
to
a)
L
Q
L
a)
L
�
O
0
L
0
co
>j
m
U
a)
t+
O
>
Q
�
L
�
m
a�
aD
a)
LL
LL
LL
u)
(_n
U
N
Co
0
_0
g
IL
�
-Q
O
�
�
o
(n
L
U
L.
o
�
m
U
d
C
a>
2
2
c�
O
(n
d
(6
O=
N
a)
J
O
J
fC6
CM
N
iU)
z
C:
LLL
cu
O
—
a)
fn
N
a)
>
L
__
C6
L
N
C
U
(n
d
Cn
m
O
L
x �
W
ai
E
C)
Cn
C
}'
0
mN
J
m
O
Q
a)
�
LL
U
J
Cn
0
0
g
0
0
a-
--
'
-
�-
N
E
E
E
E
N
(o
N
O
N(D
co
(n
(D
V)
a)
(n
(D
cn
a)
w
a)
U)
a)
to
N
cn
a)
(o
N
co
N
(n
(D
(o
a)
(n
N
(o
N
to
(D
co
N
_
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
U
U
U
C)
0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
C
C
C
C
C
v^
v^
v^
v^
v^
co
3:
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
L
p
L
L
C
L
C
L
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
I —
LLI
a_
U
a
LL
U
N
O
N
4
N
CD
C
'a
R
^co
�A
N
V
Q
L
CU
O
m
C
R
a
a_
U
a
LL
U
a
Packet Pg. 160
2024 CFP/CIP v1.8 137
rOft EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
2024-2029 PROPOSED
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN &
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2023
EDMONDS
PARKS. RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Table of Contents
Director's Letter................................................................ 2
CIP/CFP Worksheets.......................................................3-7
Project Distribution Map ................................................. 8
Project Descriptions......................................................9-31
Program Descriptions...................................................32-34
Acquisition Descriptions...............................................35-37
FundDetail.....................................................................
38
Fund 332 (Capital Const. & Impact Fee) Detail ............39-40
Fund 125 (REET 11) Detail ................................................
41
Fund 126 (REET 1) Detail .................................................
42
Fund 143 (Tree) Detail ....................................................
43
Fund 137 (Cemetery) Detail ...........................................
44
Annual Project Comparison ............................................ 45
r
n r,kL
8.A.c
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
September 19, 2023
Members of the City Council, Parks & Planning Board, Staff and Citizens of Edmonds,
The following document outlines the 6-year Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan
(CFP). The CIP/CFP serve as a planning guide identifying parks capital projects and related funding sources and
reflects the priorities established in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan based largely on
citizens' priorities. The CIP/CFP is updated annually through a public process including presentations and Public
Hearings hosted by both the Parks & Planning Board and the City Council.
There were several significant Parks Capital project accomplishments in 2023 to include:
1. Completion of the 8-acre Civic Center Playfield two-year construction project with a June 23rd Grand
Opening.
2. Completion of the 96th Avenue Infiltration project required for Civic Center Playfield which will
significantly reduce the contaminated water run-off into Shell Creek in Yost Park.
3. An Interlocal Agreement with City of Mountlake Terrace supporting the Ballinger Park Phase 3
development to provide improved park access for Edmonds residents.
The 2023 projects in process include:
1. Demolition of the structures on the property donated by Shirley Johnson (abatement completed).
2. Improvements to the Edmonds Lake Ballinger Access (McAleer) area.
3. Improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park — engineering completed, and permit submitted for paved path,
shade structure, permanent restroom and parking improvements.
4. Tree maintenance for large oak trees at 5th and Main.
5. Many deferred maintenance projects throughout the park system.
After completing two significant multi -million -dollar park projects consecutively (Edmonds Waterfront Center and
Civic Center Playfield), the Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department will turn our focus on deferred
maintenance throughout the city's existing parks system and recreation facilities.
Further, the department will remain focused on acquisition of additional parkland to fill system gaps in
park services and to address inequities in parkland distribution as identified in the 2022 PROS Plan.
Your Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department is proud to serve the citizens and visitors of Edmonds and
we look forward keeping the Edmonds parks safe, accessible, and enjoyable for all.
Sincerely,
I
,SL�w ti--
Angie Feser
Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director
425-771-0256
Angie.Feser@EdmondsWA.gov
Page 2
Packet Pg. 163
8.A.c
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
#
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD*
D19
Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III
$ 200,000
$
$
$
$
$
$ 200,0(
Development. Payment due upon completion of project.
D5
Mathay Ballinger Park *CARRYFORWARD*
D6
Construction of improvements including permanent restroom, paved trail, picnic
$ 271,300
$
$
$
$
$
$ 271,3(
D7
shelter ADA access and other amenities.
Shell Creek Restoration *CARRYFORWARD*
R19
Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based
$ 120,000
$ 380,000
$
$
$
$
$ 500,0(
on study. Study in 2024, work in 2025.
R9
Yost Park & Pool
R4
Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include resurface of tennis courts
$ 154,300
$ 1,296,400
$
$
$
$
$ 1,450,7(
R6
and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs/replacement in 2024, inclusive
-
-
-
-
R11
playground and pool upgrades in 2025.
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
D8
Expansion of the current columbarium. Funding provided through the Cemetery
$
$ 159,100
$
$
$
$
$ 159,1(
Trust Fund 137.
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting
X
D20
In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park
$
$ 1,500,000
$
$
$
$
$ 1,500,0(
and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and
future construction of two additional fields.
Neighborhood Park SE 1
X
D13
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds
$
$ 79,600
$ 819,500
$
$
$
$ 899,1(
(funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
R8
Sierra Park
$
$
$ 415,000
$
$
$
$ 415,0(
Playground replacement and upgrade to inclusive standards.
R7
Olympic Beach Park
$
$ 20,000
$ 33,000
$
$
$
$ 53,0(
Renovation of existing restrooms.
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
a_
U
a
LL
U
0)
N
O
N
N
O
N
s�
c
O
tm
d
C
O
U
Q
L
O
m
a►
c
C
O
IL
IL_
U
IL
LL
U
N
Y
a
N
C
N
t
c�
O
r
Q
C
d
t
c�
tv
.r
Q
Page 3 Packet Pg. 164
8.A.c
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
#
D10
Pine Street Park
D11
Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables,
$
$ 40,000
$ 124,400
$
$
$
$ 164,4(
D12
canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway.
Johnson Property
R2
Master plan for future park use. Site development not included in estimate.
$
$
$ 82,000
$
$
$
$ 82,0(
P5
Demolition, debris removal and site security completed in 2023.
Neighborhood Park SR99
X
D15
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$
$
$ 82,000
$ 844,100
$
$
$ 926,1(
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
x
P1
Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building
$
$
$ 1,125,500
$ 4,637,100
$
$
$ 5,762,6(
D2
Replace and/or renovate shop facilities located in City Park.
R12
Maplewood Hill Park
$
$
$ -
$ 347,800
$
$
$ 347,8(
Playground replacement.
Neighborhood Park SE 2
X
D18
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$
$
$
$ 84,400
$ 869,500
$
$ 953,9(
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
Waterfront Walkway
P3
Connecting the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to
$
$
$
$
$ 515,000
$ 819,500
$ 1,334,5(
D14
Marina Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide
_
Condominiums, to provide ADA improvements.
R16
Seaview Park
$
$
$
$
$ 417,900
$ -
$ 417,9(
Replacement of permanent restroom to provide ADA upgrades.
D16
Elm Street Park
D17
Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground,
$
$
$
$
$ 100,000
$ 340,370
$ 440,3,
R14
small shelter with picnic tables and habitat restoration.
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
a_
U
a
u_
U
0)
N
O
N
N
O
N
C�
c
'a
L
O
d
C
O
V
Q
L
MO
W
a1
C
C
O
a
a_
U
a
u_
U
N
Y
i
a
N
C
N
E
t
0
O
r
Q
c
m
t
V
O
.r
rr
Q
Page 4 Packet Pg. 165
8.A.c
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
#
X
R15
Pool Replacement
$
$
$
$
$
$ 23,881,000
$ 23,881,0(
Replacement of the existing Yost pool. Design, location, and funding TBD.
Meadowdale Playfields
R3
Renovations as suggested by the City of Lynnwood and consistent with re
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$
negotiated and updated Interlocal Agreement. May include addition of dugout
-
roofs, light replacement and playground upgrade.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
Master Plan development and implementation of the Edmonds Marsh to daylight
X
P4
D9
the waterway connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and two fresh
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$
water creeks providing restoration of fresh water/salt water estuary and natural
-
D1
tidal exchange. (All expenses are TBD per Council direction in December 2022).
Acquisition funding identified in Parkland Acquisition program.
(A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS
$ 745,600
$ 3,475,100
$ 2,681,400
$ 5,913,400
$ 1,902,400
$ 25,040,870
$ 33,070,01
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year
Tot:
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
R17
Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular and deferred maintenance,
$ 450,000
$
450,000
$
450,000
$
450,000
$
450,000
$
450,000
$
2,700,0(
repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment.
Signage & Wayfinding
R10
Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a
$ 75,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
75,0(
consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system.
Parkland Acquisition Support
$ 50,000
$
50,000
$
50,000
$
50,000
$
50,000
$
50,000
$
300,0(
Funds utilized to evaluate potential acquisitions and complete due diligence.
Debt Service and Interfund Transfers
Debt service on Civic Park $1.6M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to
$ 123,000
$
123,000
$
123,000
$
123,000
$
123,000
$
123,000
$
738,0(
Engineering for Capital Project Support.
(B) SUBTOTAL - PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
$ 698,000
$
623,000
$
623,000
$
623,000
$
623,000
$
623,000
$
3,813,0(
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
a_
U
a
LL
U
M
N
O
N
N
0
N
c
O
cm
d
c
O
c�
Q
13
L
R
O
m
a1
c
c
a
IL_
U
IL
LL
U
N
Y
i
a
N
C
N
t
0
O
r
Q
C
d
t
t�
tv
Q
Page 5 Packet Pg. 166
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
8.A.c
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
PARKLAND ACQUISITION
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
X
A2
Neighborhood Park SE 1
$ 1,500,000
$ -
$
$
$
$
$ 1,500,0(
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
X
A3
Neighborhood Park SR99
$ -
$ 1,545,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,545,0(
Acquisition of parkland near SR 99.
X
A4
Neighborhood Park SE 2
$
$ -
$ 2,185,500
$
$
$
$ 2,185,5(
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
A5
Interurban Trail
$
$ -
$ _
$
$
$ 895,585
$ 895,5i
Acquisition for trail extension.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
X
Al
Acquisition of the Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$ -
restoration.
(C) SUBTOTAL - PARKLAND ACQUISITION
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,545,000
$ 2,185,500
$ -
$
$ 895,585
$ 6,126,0
E_
U
a
u_
U
rn
N
O
N
N
0
N
C!
C
i
O
m
c
O
Q
L
O
m
a1
c
C
Rs
IL
(D) TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B+C) $ 2,943,600 $ 5,643,100 $ 5,489,900 $ 6,536,400 $ 2,525,400 $ 26,559,455 $ 43,009,1!
a
PARKS CIP REVENUE
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,0i
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 9,500,0
Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 1,800,0
Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 1,290,0
Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - Columbarium Expansion
$ 159,100
$ 159,1(
ARPA Contribution - Shell Creek Study
$ 120,000
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
$
$ 120,0(
Investment Interest (3%)
$ 18,918
$ 24,795
$ 30,849
$ 37,085
$ 43,507
$ 50,122
$ 205,2,
Donations
$ -
$
$ -
$
$ -
$
$
Bond Proceeds
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Secured Grants
$
$
$ -
$
$ -
$
$
Unsecured Grants/Funding - non -land acquisition
$ -
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,945,000
$ 5,481,200
$ 869,500
$ 24,756,800
$ 34,552,5(
(E) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE
$ 2,853,918
$ 3,898,895
$ 4,190,849
$ 7,733,285
$ 3,128,007
$ 27,021,922
$ 48,826,8;
U
a
LL
U
N
Y
i
O
a
N
C
N
t
0
O
r
Q
C
d
E
t
c�
ca
r
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) Q
Page 6
Packet Pg. 167
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
8.A.c
Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(F) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 3,150,795
$ 3,061,113
$ 1,316,908
$ 17,857
$ 1,214,742
$ 1,817,349
(E) Revenue
$ 2,853,918
$ 3,898,895
$ 4,190,849
$ 7,733,285
$ 3,128,007
$ 27,021,922
(D) Expenditures
$ 2,943,600
$ 5,643,100
$ 5,489,900
$ 6,536,400
$ 2,525,400
$ 26,559,455
(G) Ending Fund Balance (F+E-D)
$ 3,061,113
$ 1,316,908
$ 17,857
$ 1,214,742
$ 1,817,349
$ 2,279,817
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
Page 7
Packet Pg. 168
8.A.c
P5 Johnson Property
R3 Meadowdale Playfields
D6 Mathay Ballinger Park
R9, R4, R6, R11 Yost Park & Pool
D19 Lake Ballinger Park (MIT)
D8 Columbarium Expansion - Phase II i
R7 Olympic Beach Park
D10, D11, D12 Pine Street Park
R8 Sierra Park
r��•F
P3, D14 Waterfront Walkway —=
R12 Maplewood Hill Park
P4, D9, D1 Edmonds Marsh Restoration
D16, D17, R14 Elm Street Park
P1, D2 Parks Maintenance Building
R16 Seaview Park
R15 Pool Replacement
Al Edmonds Marsh Restoration
A5 Interurban Trail �; 1
R19 Shell Creek Restoration
D20 Woodway Campus Athletic
Complex
* Non -site specific projects
A2 , P2, D13 Neighborhood Park SE 1
A3, P6, D15 Neighborhood Park SR99
A4, P7, D18 Neighborhood Park SE 2
R17 Citywide Park Improvements R12
R10 Signage & Wayfinding
C
P1
ID2
* Site specific projects only.
Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. DRAFT
Packet Pg. 169
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
PROJECTS
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Page 9
Packet Pg. 170
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Lake Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA — D19
- r�
v Interurban Trad
Improved Park Entry
r► y Proposed Crossing by the U S.
_rfr' Army Corps of Engineers
/' I
J Senior Center
i
r` Proposed Channel by the
6 ft Asphalt Path U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
� t
6 It Wood Chips Path` j
6 ft Gravel Path
Proposed Boardwalk by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers
Boardwalk & Viewing Platform
Lake Ballinger
Lake Ballinger Park, City of Mountlake Terrace
Project Summary: Through an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mountlake Terrace, the City of Edmonds will
support the construction of the planned improvements in the northwest area of Lake Ballinger Park including a park
entry, pathways and access to Lake Ballinger. The project is underway and payment is due upon completion of the
project.
I
Project Justification: This western boundary of the park is Edmonds city limits and these improvements will provide '
better access to Lake Ballinger Park for Edmonds residents. The revenue contribution supports the construction of the
improvements which will benefit the City of Edmonds. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and
Open Space (PROS) Plan including 3 Recommendations, 1 Goal and 3 Objectives. Recommendation 1.2 Expand
partnerships and agreements with other nearby jurisdictions. Recommendation 3.6 Explore options for access to Lake
Ballinger with the City of Mountlake Terrace to include possible joint development and consideration of a fishing pier.
Recommendation 5.2 Repair and improve or extend trails and boardwalks to allow improved public access to natural
areas for nature/wildlife viewing, hiking and outdoor experience. PROS Goal 3, Objectives 3.2, 3.8 and 3.11.
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Page 10
Packet Pg. 171
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Mathay Ballinger Park - D6
24100 78th Place West
Project Summary: Park improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park began in 2023 and are continuing into 2024.
Improvements include the addition of a permanent restroom, a shelter with picnic tables and a paved pathway to
provide ADA accessibility to the playground as well as connect the paved Interurban Trail spur. Approximately
$228,000 was expended in 2023 for the engineering, permitting and restroom procurement.
Project Justification: Upgrades to this park are supported by 5 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 8 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.3 is to prioritize improvements to Mathay
Ballinger Park and upgrade, enhance or replace park amenities, specifically the play amenities. Recommendation 3.5
is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park... and paved pathway connections
in Mathay Ballinger Park. Recommendation 6.4 is to install permanent restrooms at Marina Beach Park and Mathay
Ballinger Park. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.6, Goal 3 Objectives 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9 Goal 9 Objective 9.1
and Recommendations 3.1 and 6.2 also align with these upgrades.
Estimated Cost: $499,300 (approx. $228,000 expended in 2023)
Page 11
Packet Pg. 172
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Shell Creek Restoration — R19
Shell Creek, Yost Park
Project Summary: Restorative work of Shell Creek waterway in Yost Park to address erosion issues. Scope of this
work will be determined based on a study conducted in 2024. The goal of the study is to determine what
improvements are needed to support a healthy environment for the natural ecosystem within the park. and
decrease stream bed erosion. With Shell Creek in its entirety being a salmon -bearing stream silting issues caused
by erosion within Yost Park may impact spawning habitat. Erosion has caused closure of a pedestrian bridge in the
upper creek corridor in the park, causing significant impact to trail users by lack of ability to cross the creek to
access both sides of the park. In addition, other pedestrian bridges are deteriorating and in short order, require
replacement. Restoration, including near t erm actions to address severe erosion issues caused by the creek, may
include habitat and environmental protection and enhancement, mitigation opportunities and potential trail and
bridge relocations.
Project Justification: The 45-acre Yost Park, containing a portion of Shell Creek, has a need to prevent erosive
conditions. This work is the second phase in addressing the pedestrian system (boardwalks, bridges, and trails)
and Shell Creek water quality and health. 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan - Goal 3: Parks, Trails
& Open Space, Objectives 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4: Waterfront Use & Access, Objectives 4.2 and 4.4; Goal 5: Natural
Resource & Habitat Conservation Objectives, 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6: Climate Change, Adaptation & Resiliency,
Objective 6.5; and Goal 9: Park Operations & Administration Objectives 9.1 and 9.2.
Estimated Cost: $500,000
Construction (R19) — Creek Restoration
2024
$120,000
2025 2026
$380,000
2027Total
$500,000
Total Expenses
$120,000
$380,000
$500,000
ARPA Funding Transfer
$120,000
$120,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II — Fund 125
$380,000
$380,000
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$120,000
i
$380,000
$500,000
Page 12
Packet Pg. 173
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Yost Park & Pool - R91 R41 R6 & R11
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: Future Park enhancements, repair, and maintenance to include a playground replacement,
resurface of tennis/pickleball courts, pool upgrades and trail, bridge, and boardwalk repairs / replacement. The
playground at Yost Park installed in 1995, is 27 years old, has reached the end of its lifecycle, is not ADA accessible
and is scheduled to be replaced in 2025.
Project Justification: To maintain safety amenities should be repaired and/or replaced as supported in the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan Recommendation 3.1 which is to maintain, renovate or replace aging or
damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety and Recommendation
3.4 replace the playgrounds at... Yost Memorial Park. In addition, this work is supported by PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective
1.1 and 1.4; Goal 3, Objective 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4, Objective 4.4, Goal 5, Objective 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.5; Goal
9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.10 and 6.2 for a total of 4 Recommendations, 6 Goals and 9 Objectives.
Estimated Cost: $1,450,700
Construction (M) — Bridge repairs
$80,000
$80,000
Construction (R6) — Playground Replacement
$750,000
$750,000
Construction (R9)—Tennis Court Resurface
$74,300
$74,300
Construction (R11) — Pool Upgrades
$546,400
$546,400
Total Expenses
$154,300
$1,296,400
1,450,700
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$154,300
$1,296,400
1,450,700
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$154,300
i
1 $1,296,400
1,450,700
Page 13
Packet Pg. 174
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Olympic Beach Park - R7
200 Admiral Way, Entrance of the Fishing Pier
Project Summary: Renovation of existing restroom and Visitor Center.
Project Justification: This work is supported by 3 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach,
Seaview Park and Brackett's Landing North. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 4, Objective 4.1; Goal 9, Objective
9.1 and Recommendation 6.3 also align with these upgrades.
Estimated Cost: $53,000
Planning (R7) — Restroom Renovation
$20,000
$20,000
Construction (R7) — Restroom Renovation
$33,000
$33,000
Total Expenses
$20,000
$33,000
$53,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$20,000
$33,000
$53,000
Total Revenue
$20,000
$33,000
$53,000
Page 14
Packet Pg. 175
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
D20: Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase I Lighting
23200 1001h Ave. W
Project Summary: This project consists of two components: Phase I lighting addition, Phase II renovation of
existing underdeveloped athletic field and would be coordinated with the property owner, Edmonds School
District.
Project Justification: By adding lighting to the renovated Phase I year-round field, usage of the multi -use facility
would significantly increase. Phase II would renovate a currently poorly maintained and underutilized large
athletic field to provide community significantly more multi -sport use of an existing facility. This Athletic Complex
serves a densely populated area of more than 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance costs
could be offset by user fees. Phase I without lighting installation was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phase II
estimated at $6-8M with funding and timing undetermined. This partnership improvement is supported by a
Recommendation, 2 Goals and 5 Objectives in the 2022 PROS Plan including Recommendation 3.2 "expand
partnerships and agreements with Edmonds School District ... to provide public access and opportunities for
outdoor recreation". And PROS Plan Goal 3, Objectives 3.3, 3.9, 3.10 and 3.11; and Goal 9, Objective 9.4.
Estimated Cost: Phase I Lighting: $1,500,000; Phase II: $6 — 8M
Page 15
Packet Pg. 176
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SE 1— P2, D13
Project Summary: Acquire and develop an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address an
existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized (see
Land Acquisition Section for details) a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding
community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1
Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor.
PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and
3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park.
Estimated Cost: $899,100 + Parkland Acquisition
Planning— Neighborhood Park SE 1 (P2)
$79,600
2029 Total
$79,600
Construction — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (D13)
$819,500
$819,500
Total Expenses
$79,600 $819,500
$899,100
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$79,600
$79,600
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$79,600
$0 00
$79,600
00
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 16
Packet Pg. 177
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Sierra Park — R8
81st Ave W & 190th St SW
Project Summary: Replacement of the playground and fall surfacing at Sierra Park. The playground is 27 years old and
is currently the smallest and most limited playground in the park system. The new playground is intended to be
inclusive level design.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at
Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8, Goal
9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.1 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $415,000
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 17
Packet Pg. 178
Parks & Recreation
Pine Street Park - D10, D11 & D12
LA._
4
6th and Pine Street
Project Summary: Park improvements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, canopy shade trees
and a paved interior connecting pathway.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.5 is to add amenities to existing parks, such
as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park and paved pathway connections in
Mathay Ballinger Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and
Recommendation 6.2 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $164,400
Planning (D10, 11, 12)
$40,000
2028 2029
Total
$40,000
Construction (D10) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables
$59,600
$59,600
Construction (D11) — Paved Pathway
$38,300
$38,300
Construction (D12) — Canopy Shade Trees
$26,500
$26,500
Total Expenses
$40,000
$124,400
$164,400
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$40,000
$124,400
$164,400
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$40,000
I
1 $124,400
I
$164,400
I
Page 18
Packet Pg. 179
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Maplewood Hill Park — R12
19800 89th PI W
Project Summary: Replacement of the existing playground installed in 1985. This playground is 38 years old and is
the oldest in the park system.
Project Justification: This improvement is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill
Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1
and Recommendation 3.1 also align with this improvement.
Estimated Cost: $347,800
Page 19
Packet Pg. 180
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SR 99 — P6 & D15
Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SR 99 area to address an
existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized (see
Land Acquisition Section for details) a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding
community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1
Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor.
PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and
3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park.
Estimated Cost: $926,100 + Parkland Acquisition
Planning— Neighborhood Park SR99 (P6)
$82,000
$82,000
Construction — Neighborhood Park SR 99 (D15)
$844,100
$844,100
Total Expenses
F7
$82,000 $844,100
$926,100
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$82,000
$82,000
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$82,000
$0 00
$82,000
00
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 20
Packet Pg. 181
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Johnson Property - P5
9309 Bowdoin Way
Project Summary: This project is to design a master plan for this 1-acre property donated by Shirley Johnson in 2021.
The house and outbuildings were removed in 2023. The site includes historic fruit and nut trees which have all been
neglected for years. The master planning process uses a combination of park system -wide goals (PROS Plan), property
opportunities and constraints and community input on future design and usage for the space and provides supporting
documentation for potential grants for future improvements.
Project Justification: This project is supported by 1 Recommendation, 5 Goals and 11 Objectives of the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.1 — Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged
infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1;
Goal 3, Objective 3.7, 3.8 and 3.10; Goal 5, Objective 5.1; Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5; Goal 9, Objectives 9.1,
9.3 and 9.5 also align with this project.
Estimated Cost: $82,000
Page 21
Packet Pg. 182
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building - P1 & D2
600 3rd Avenue South, City Park
Project Summary: Replacement of 40+year old Parks and Facilities Maintenance building and renovation of the yard
area in City Park. Currently undersized to accommodate staff, vehicles and equipment, mechanical work spaces and
employee facilities and the facility is reaching the end of its useful life.
Project Justification: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work
areas and fixed equipment storage in order to more efficiently maintain City parks and Capital facilities. The city's
small equipment repair garage is used as the Park Maintenance locker room, daily meeting room, computer access
(two for 17 FTEs) and work preparation space. It is insufficient for work efficiency and creates a conflicting work space
of small machinery repair and gathering space. This project is supported by 1 Goals, 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.9 align with this project.
Estimated Cost: $5,762,600
Planning & Design (P1)
$1,125,500
$1,125,500
Construction (D2)
$4,637,100
$4,637,100
Total Expenses
$1,125,500
$4,637,100
$5,762,600
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Park Impact Fees — Fund 332-100
Bond Proceeds
Operating Contribution — General Fund
Park Donations
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
00
00
.00
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 22
Packet Pg. 183
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Columbarium Expansion Phase II — D8
820 15th St SW, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery
Project Summary: Expansion of the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Columbarium. Funding provided through the
Cemetery Trust Fund 137 which accumulates fund balance based on Cemetery usage and revenue generated.
Project Justification: As the existing columbarium continues to fill up, it is appropriate to begin planning for the Phase
II expansion. The design is complete and since it is continuation of phase improvements, could be relatively simple to
implement.
Estimated Cost: $159,100
Page 23
Packet Pg. 184
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section - P3 & D14
Beachfront in front of Ebb Tide Condominiums (200 Beach Place)
Project Summary: This improvement would provide a continuous ADA accessible waterfront walkway from Brackett's
Landing North to Marina Beach Park ensuring all individuals, including those with mobility challenges and those using
wheeled carriers can safely enjoy the waterfront. The final missing piece is a constructed pathway beach side of the
Ebb Tide condominiums in the easement owned by the City of Edmonds.
Project Justification: To provide public ADA access along the waterfront for all individuals. Completion of the walkway
would meet ADA requirements, support efforts to keep dogs off of the beaches and was recognized as a high priority
by residents participating in the development of the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. This project is
supported by 1 Recommendation, 3 Goals and 5 Objectives in the PROS Plan. Recommendation 6.2 is to implement
upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure
universal accessibility to include required parking, providing ramped entrances and site furnishings. PROS Plan Goal 3,
Objective 3.8; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4, Goal 6, Objective 6.7 also align with this project.
Estimated Cost: $1,334,500
Planning & Design
$515,000
$515,000
Construction
$819,500 $819,500
Total Expenses
$515,000
$819,500 $1,334,500
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$515,000
$515,000
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$515,000
$515,000
ii ii
Page 24
Packet Pg. 185
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SE 2 — P7, D18
f 11
Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address
an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition (see Land Acquisition
Section for details) has been authorized a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding
community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1
Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor.
PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and
3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park.
Estimated Cost: $953,900 + Parkland Acquisition
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 25
Packet Pg. 186
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Seaview Park Restroom — R16
80th Ave W & 186th St SW
Project Summary: Improvements to include renovation or replacement of the permanent restroom to provide ADA
compliant facilities.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 3 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 6 is to make improvements to existing parks
as needed to ensure proper maintenance, usability and quality of park features and grounds to remove barriers and
improve universal access. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park
and Brackett's Landing North. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendations 3.1 and
6.2 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $417,900
Construction (R16) — Restroom Replacement $417,900 $417,900
Total Expenses
$417,900
$417,900
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$417,900
$417,900
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$417,900
$0
$417,900
$0
Page 26
Packet Pg. 187
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Elm Street Park - D16, D17 & R14
7 t h & Elm Street
Project Summary: Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, small shelter with picnic tables
and habitat restoration.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.1 is to add amenities to existing parks, such
as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 6, Objective 6.5; Goal
9, Objective 9.1; and Recommendation 3.5 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $440,370
a
Planning (R14, D16, D17)
$100,000
$100,000
Construction (R14) — Habitat Restoration
$56,300
$56,300
Construction (D16) — Nature Playground
$199,670
$199,670
Construction (D17) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables
$84,400
$84,400
Total Expenses
$100,000
$340,370
$440,370
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$100,000
$284,070
$384,070
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$100,000
i
$284,070
i0
$384,070
0i
Page 27
Packet Pg. 188
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Yost Pool Replacement — R15
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: Yost Pool was built nearly 50 years ago and continues to provide recreational opportunities for
many residents and visitors. In addition to teaching youth lifesaving water safety, the pool serves as an opportunity
for community members of all ages to lead healthy and active lifestyles. Funding for this project has not been
identified and would likely require voter approval.
Project Justification: Replacing Yost Pool is supported by 4 Recommendations, 4 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 4 is to replace Yost Pool. PROS Plan Goal 1,
Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 7, Objective 7.4; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendations
3.1, 4.1, 4.2 and 6.2 also align with this replacement.
Estimated Cost: $23,881,000
Planning & Construction (1115)
2028
2029
$23,881,000
Total
$23,881,000
Total Expenses
$23,881,000
$23,881,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Secured Grants
Bonds
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$0
000
$0
000
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 28
Packet Pg. 189
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Meadowdale Playfields - R3
168th ST SW, Lynnwood
Project Summary: Currently identifying potential budget allocation for shared improvements and related
expenditures dependent upon pending Interlocal Agreement negotiations.
Project Justification: The cities of Lynnwood and Edmonds and Edmonds School District currently have an Interlocal
Agreement (ILA) for Meadowdale Park for shared cost of capital improvements, renovations, and ongoing
maintenance. This work is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 5 Objectives of the 2022 Parks, Recreation
and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1.2 — Expand partnerships and agreements with the Edmonds School
District, Snohomish County, and other nearby jurisdictions (cities of Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, Woodway, and
Shoreline) to improve public access and opportunities for outdoor recreation and Recommendation 6.2 - Implement
upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure
universal accessibility to include required parking, providing ramped entrances and site furnishings. PROS Plan Goal 2,
Objective 2.6; Goal 3, Objective 3.8, 3.10 and 3.11 and Goal 7, Objective 7.2 also align with this work.
Estimated Cost: TBD, negotiations are ongoing with the City of Lynnwood.
Construction (R3)
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Total Expenses
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Ending Fund Balance/Impact Fees - 332
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Total Revenue
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
i
TBD
i
TBD
TBD
Page 29
Packet Pg. 190
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Edmonds Marsh -Estuary Expansion & Restoration - Al, P4, D9 & D1
Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh, Marina Beach Park and property owned by Unocal (Chevron)
Project Summary: Reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh near -shore estuary by restoring the natural
tidal exchange. This project will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation including
daylighting of Willow Creek within the park and the Edmonds Marsh. In addition, this project encompasses the
possible acquisition or use of the adjacent 21-acre parcel known as the Unocal property to support a larger estuary
restoration project. Once acquired, an integrated restoration plan can be developed to restore functioning conditions
of the tidal wetland for salmon recovery, wildlife conservation and improved public access for recreational use,
environmental education and wildlife viewing.
Project Justification: The marsh estuary restoration project will allow for and provide a natural tidal exchange, allow
salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek, support migratory birds and waterfowl, provide a natural redistribution
of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna and address sea level rise impacts. This project is supported by 3
Recommendations, 5 Goals and 8 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 2.2 — Expand the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary to include the Unocal property. Develop funding strategy
for purchase of the Unocal property or negotiate with the State of Washington to have the property become part of
the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 4, Objective 4.3; Goal 5, Objectives 5.1, 5.3 and
5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.5 and 6.7; Goal 9, Objective 9.1; Recommendation 2.1 and 3.11 also align with this project.
Estimated Cost: TBD Acquisition and Planning + Restoration + Marina Beach Park renovation
Continued on next page.
Page 30
Packet Pg. 191
8.A.c
Edmonds Marsh -Estuary Expansion & Restoration— continued.
.
2027
2028
2029
Total
Land Acquisition (Al)
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Master Plan (P4)
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Master Plan Implementation (D9)
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Restoration (D1) -TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Total Expenses
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Real Estate Excise Tax I — Fund 126
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Bond Proceeds
Secured Grants
Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition
Park Donations
Operating Contribution — General Fund
Stormwater — Fund 422
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Project Accounting #M070
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Expense estimates and funding sources changed to TBD per Council direction December 2022.
Page 31
Packet Pg. 192
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
PROGRAMS
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Page 32
Packet Pg. 193
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program - R17
�4-
rm a
Project Summary: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) plan identified a significant list of deferred park
maintenance projects. With the addition of a Parks Capital Project Manager, hired in 2022 and the Job Order
Contracting program, the Parks Department will continue to make progress on the numerous system -wide repairs,
renovations and replacements of an aging parks infrastructure.
Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and related assets lead to higher deferred maintenance costs,
increased City liability and decreased level of service and community satisfaction. This program is supported by 5
Recommendations, 6 Goals and 21 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 3.1 is to Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties
to ensure public accessibility, use and safety. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objectives 3.6, 3.7, 3.8
and 3.9; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2, 4.4; Goal 5, Objective 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5 and 6.7;
Goal 9, Objective 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.9 and Recommendations 3.7, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 also align with this program.
Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 (6-year total)
024
2025
Repair & Maintenance $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000
Professional Services $150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$900,000
Total Expenses $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000
$450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000
Total Revenue $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000
Unsecured Funding i i i i
Page 33
Packet Pg. 194
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Signage & Wayfinding — R10
• VIEW POINT PLAY STRUCTURE
NATURAL AREA&DOG WALK
PARKOPEN DAWN TO DUSK
Project Summary: Update park and recreation facilities signage system -wide to include uniform and accurate trail
identification information, orientation markers, safety and regulatory messaging, park hours, park rules and etiquette,
interpretive information and warning signs.
Project Justification: A comprehensive and consistent signage system is necessary to inform, orient and educate park
users. This program is supported by 2 Recommendations, 4 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and
Opens Space (PROS) plan. Recommendation 6.5 is to develop and provide consistent graphics and citywide signage to
improve communication on access, usability and "branding" of the city's park and open space system. PROS Plan Goal
2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objective 3.6; Goal 5, Objectives 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and
Recommendation 6.2 also align with this program.
Estimated Cost: $75,000
Page 34
Packet Pg. 195
91
,6#
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
t".
PARKLAND
ACQUISITION
1r. ,
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Page 35
Packet Pg. 196
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Parkland Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1, SR 99 & SE 2 - A2, A3 & A4
Project Summary: Acquisition of parkland that will benefit citizens and support the priorities identified in the PROS
Plan. Currently, $1,100,000 is reserved for parkland and open space acquisition. These funds were accumulated from
2019 through 2023. There is no specific request to purchase a particular parcel as opportunities are somewhat limited
in a mostly built -out city, but staff continues to search for, develop and negotiate opportunities.
Project Justification: Parkland Acquisitions are supported by 1 Recommendation, 2 Goals and 5 Objectives (land
purchase only, see previous projects for development) in the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas
such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.1, 3.2,
3.3 and 3.9 also align with the acquisition of parkland.
Estimated Cost: $5,230,500
2026
2027
2028
2029
Total
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (A2)
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3)
$1,545,000
$1,545,000
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4)
$2,185,500
$2,185,500
Total Expenses
$1,500,000
$1,545,000 $2,185,500
$5,230,500
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126
$1,300,000
$200,000 $200,000
$1,700,000
Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD
Total Revenue
$1,300,000
$200,000 $200,000
$1,700,000
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 36
Packet Pg. 197
8.A.c
Parks & Recreation
Interurban Trail Expansion — A5
L16—
� �?' .,
-t'A'. ..
1�{�3�,::�.. ..1 .:-Jl..si�S1Y��i�]ML•F�rd�.�,
24100 78th Place West
Project Summary: Acquisition of additional lands, easements and/or right-of-ways to continue the Interurban Trail,
including more off -road segments.
Project Justification: This Expansion is supported by 3 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 5 is to improve trail connections including
sidewalks and bike lanes to help link destinations across the community. Recommendation 5.1 suggests the City
peruse opportunities to acquire additional lands, easements and/or right of way to continue the Interurban Trail. Goal
2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6 and Recommendations 1.1 and 5.2 also align with this
expansion.
Estimated Cost: $895,585
Land Acquisition — Park Facilities (A5) $895,585 $895,585
Total Expenses $895,585 $895,585
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126
Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding ($895,585) ($895,585)
Page 37
Packet Pg. 198
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
FUND DETAIL
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
a_
U
r�
Q
Page 38
Packet Pg. 199
Fund 332
8.A.c
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Fund 332 Expenditures
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
D9
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan Implementation)
$
D1
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Restoration)
$
R14
Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration
$ 56,300
$ 56,300
D6
Mathay Ballinger Park Permanent Restrooms
$ 100,000
$ -
R3
Meadowdale Playfields (Renovations, City of Lynnwood ILA)
$ -
D13
Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Park Development)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
D15
Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Park Development)
$ 844,100
$ 844,100
D18
Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Park Development)
$ 869,500
$ 869,500
R15
Pool Replacement
$ 23,881,000
$ 23,881,000
P1
Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design)
$ 1,125,500
$ 1,125,500
D2
Parks Facilities M&O Building (Construction)
$ 4,637,100
$ 4,637,100
R19
Shell Creek Restoration (Yost Park)
$ 120,000
$ 120,000
D14
Waterfront Walkway (Construction)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
D20
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
Interfund Services
$ 68,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 150,000
Debt Service Civic Park $1.6M (2021)
$ 98,000
$ 98,0001
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,0001
$ 98,0001
$ 588,000
(C) TOTAL Fund 332 Expenditures
$ 266,000
1 $ 243,0001
$ 1,623,000
1 $ 2,068,000
$ 5,604,200
$ 992,5001
$24,879,800
1 $35,410,500
Fund 332 Revenue
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Park Impact Fees (Fund 332-100)
$ 682,681
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 1,800,000
Investment Interest (3%)
$ 6,230
$ 18,918
$ 24,795
$ 30,849
$ 37,085
$ 43,507
$ 50,122
$ 205,277
Miscellaneous Park Donations
$ -
Bond Proceeds
$
ARPA Transfer - Shell Creek Restoration (Study)
$ 120,000
$ 120,000
Unsecured Funding - Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase 1
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
Unsecured Grants - Marsh Estuary Restoration
$ -
Unsecured Grants - Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration
$ 56,300
$ 56,300
Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SE 1 (Development)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SR99 (Development)
$ 844,100
$ 844,100
Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SE 2 (Development)
$ 869,500
$ 869,500
Unsecured Funding (Bonds, Levy, Misc.) Pool Replacement
$ 23,881,000
$ 23,881,000
Unsecured Funding Park Facilities M&O Building
$ 1,125,500
$ 4,637,100
$ 5,762,600
Unsecured Grants - Waterfront Walkway (Construction)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
(D) TOTAL Fund 332 Revenue
$ 688,911
$ 438,918
$ 1,824,795
$ 2,275,849
$ 5,818,285
$ 1,213,007
$25,106,922
$36,677,777
a
Page 39
Packet Pg. 200
Fund 332
8.A.c
Fund 332 Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance (332 + 332-100)
$ 207,683
$ 630,594
$ 826,512
$ 1,028,308
$ 1,236,157
$ 1,450,242
$ 1,670,749
(D) Revenue
$ 688,911
$ 438,918
$ 1,824,795
$ 2,275,849
$ 5,818,285
$ 1,213,007
$ 25,106,922
(C) Expenditures
$ 266,000
$ 243,000
$ 1,623,000
$ 2,068,000
$ 5,604,200
$ 992,500
$ 24,879,800
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 630,594
$ 826,512
$ 1,028,308
$ 1,236,157
$ 1,450,242
$ 1,670,749
$ 1,897,871
Project Type:
A Acquisition
P Master Planning
D Development - New
R Replacement/Upgrade
Page 40
Packet Pg. 201
REET II Fund 125
8.A.c
Costs inflated at 3% per year
REET II(Fund 125)Expenditures
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
P4
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan)
$ -
D16
Elm Street Park (Nature Playground)
$ 100,000
$ 199,670
$ 299,670
D17
Elm Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables)
$ 84,400
$ 84,400
R2
Johnson Property (Demo & Secure Site)
$
P5
lJohnson Property (Master Plan)
$ 82,000
$ 82,000
R12
Maplewood Hill Park (Playground Replacement)
$ 347,800
$ 347,800
D5
Mathay Ballinger Park (Paved Loop Pathway)
$
D7
Mathay Ballinger Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables)
$ -
D6
Mathay Ballinger Park Permanent Restrooms
$ 271,300
$ 271,300
D19
Mountlake Terrace ILA (Lake Ballinger Park)*
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
P2
Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Master Plan)
$ 79,600
$ 79,600
P6
Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Master Plan)
$ 82,000
$ 82,000
P7
Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Master Plan)
$ 84,400
$ 84,400
R7
Olympic Beach Park (Restroom Upgrade)
$ 20,000
$ 33,000
$ 53,000
D10
Pine Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables)
$ 20,000
$ 59,600
$ 79,600
D11
Pine Street Park (Paved Connecting Pathway)
$ 20,000
$ 38,300
$ 58,300
D12
Pine Street Park (Canopy Shade Trees)
$ 26,500
$ 26,500
R16
Seaview Park (Restroom Replacement)
$ 417,900
$ 417,900
R19
Shell Creek Restoration (Yost Park)
$ 380,000
$ 380,000
R8
Sierra Park (Playground Replacement)
$ 415,000
$ 415,000
P3
Waterfront Walkway Design Completion
$ 515,000
$ 515,000
R11
Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation
$ 546,400
$ 546,400
R9
Yost Park (Tennis Court Resurface)
$ 74,300
$ 74,300
R4
Yost Park (Trail, Bridge & Boardwalk Repairs)
$ 80,000
$ 80,000
R6
Yost Park (Playground Replacement - Inclusive)
$ 750,000
$ 750,000
R10
lSignage and Wayfinding
$ 75,000
$ 75,000
R17
ICitywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 2,700,000
(C) TOTAL PARKS REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures
$ 1,150,600
$ 2,266,000
$ 1,186,400
$ 882,200
$ 1,482,900
$ 734,070
$ 7,702,170
REET II(Fund 125)Revenue
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 9,500,000
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 9,500,000
REET II (Fund 125) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 1,222,000
$
2,071,400
$
1,305,400
$
1,619,000
$ 2,236,800
$
2,253,900
(D) Revenue
$ 2,000,000
$
1,500,000
$
1,500,000
$
1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$
1,500,000
(C) Expenditures
$ 1,150,600
$
2,266,000
$
1,186,400
$
882,200
$ 1,482,900
$
734,070
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 2,071,400
$
1,305,400
$
1,619,000
$
2,236,800
$ 2,253,900
$
3,019,830
*Project added via Council amendment in 2023 Page 41 Packet Pg. 202
REET I Fund 126
8.A.c
Costs inflated at 3% per year
REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Al
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Acquisition)
$ -
A5
Interurban Trail (Expansion/Acquisition)
$ 895,585
$ 895,585
A2
Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Acquisition)
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
A3
Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Acquisition)
$ 1,545,000
$ 1,545,000
A4
Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Acquisition)
$ 2,185,500
$ 2,185,500
Land Acquisition Services
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 300,000
(C) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures
$ 1,550,000
$ 1,595,000
$ 2,235,500
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 945,585
$ 6,426,085
REET I(Fund 126)Revenue
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,000
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,000
REET I (Fund 126) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 872,136
$ (477,864)
$ (1,872,864)
$ (3,908,364)
$ (3,758,364)
$ (3,608,364)
(D) Revenue
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
(C) Expenditures
$ 1,550,000
$ 1,595,000
$ 2,235,500
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 945,585
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ (477,864)
$ (1,872,864)
$ (3,908,364)
$ (3,758,364)
$ (3,608,364)
$ (4,353,949)
a
N
C
N
E
t
V
r
Q
r
C
d
E
t
V
O
r.+
Page 42
Packet Pg. 203
CEMETERY Trust Fund 137
8.A.c
Costs inflated at 3% per year
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Expenditures
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
D8
lColumbarium Expansion -Phase II
$ 159,100
$ 159,100
Repair & Maintenance
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 125,000
(C) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust(Fund 137) Expenditures
$ 25,000
$ 184,100
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 284,100
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Investment Interest (@5%)
$ 62,673
$ 65,306
$ 60,117
$ 62,623
$ 65,254
$ 68,016
$ 315,972
Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Sales Revenue
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 90,000
(D) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue
$ 77,673
$ 80,306
$ 75,117
$ 77,623
$ 80,254
$ 83,016
$ 405,972
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 1,253,456
$ 1,306,129
$ 1,202,335
$ 1,252,452
$ 1,305,075
$ 1,360,328
(D)Revenue
$ 77,673
$ 80,306
$ 75,117
$ 77,623
$ 80,254
$ 83,016
(C)Expenditures
$ 25,000
$ 184,100
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 1,306,129
$ 1,202,335
$ 1,252,452
$ 1,305,075
$ 1,360,328
$ 1,418,345
a
N
C
N
E
t
V
r
Q
r
C
d
E
t
V
O
r.+
Page 43
Packet Pg. 204
TREE Fund 143
8.A.c
Costs inflated at 3% per year
TREE (Fund 143)Expenditures
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Park and Open Space Acquisition Program
$
Tree Maintenance - Oak Tree's 5th & Main*
$
(C) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Expenditures
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
TREE (Fund 143)Revenue
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Tree - Fund 143
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 1,290,000
(D) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Revenue
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 1,290,000
TREE (Fund 143) 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 426,065
$
641,065
$ 856,065
$ 1,071,065
$
1,286,065
$ 1,501,065
(D) Revenue
$ 215,000
$
215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$
215,000
$ 215,000
(C) Expenditures
$ -
$
-
$ -
$ -
$
-
$ -
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 641,065
$
856,065
$ 1,071,065
$ 1,286,065
$
1,501,065
$ 1,716,065
*Added via Council Budget Amendment Dec. 2022
a
Page 44
Packet Pg. 205
8.A.c
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
PROJECTS ADDED
Type I PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
None
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
PROJECTS REMOVED
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
DESCRIPTION
Parks
Lake Ballinger Access (McAleer)
IPlayground
Project completion scheduled in 2023
Parks
Johnson Property Demolition
Demolition to be complete in 2023
Parks
Playground Upgrade Program
upgrades identified each year, no need for additional program
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
CHANGE
Parks
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
Funded through Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - scheduled in 2025 vs. 24
Parks
Elm Street Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2027 and construction in 2028 vs. 2026
Parks
Interurban Trail Expansion
Moved to 2029 vs. 28
Parks
Johnson Property Master Plan
Removed demolition, master plan scheduled in 2026 vs. 25
Parks
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA
ILA completed in 2023; payment due upon construction completion in 2024, carryforward
Parks
Maplewood Hill Park
Playground replacement moved to 2027 vs. 25, significant price increase
Parks
Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements
permanent restroom installation scheduled to take place in 2024, carryforward
Parks
Neighborhood Park SE1, SR99, SE2
X
Master plan and construction of all three parks pushed back one year (must acquire first)
Parks
Olympic Beach Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24
Parks
Parkland Acquisition/Neighborhood Parks
X
All three bumped back one year to 2024, 2025 and 2026
Parks
Pine Street Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24
Parks
Seaview Park Improvements
Restroom replacement moved to 2028 vs. 27
Parks
Shell Creek Restoration
Plan carried forward to 2024; restoration in 2025 vs. 24
Parks
Signage and Wayfinding
Price increase to $75K vs. $51,500
Parks
IYost Park & Pool Improvements
Playground replacement moved to 2025 vs. 23, significant price increase due to topography
a
N
C
N
E
t
0
r
Q
r
C
d
t
V
r.+
Page 45 Packet Pg. 206
8.A.d
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) &
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Planning Board — September 27, 2023
a
Packet Pg. 207
8.A.d
CIP
6-year maintenance 6-year capital
projects w/fundin projects w/
sources funding
sources
OComponents found only in the CIP
OComponents found only in the CFP
O Components found in both the CIP & CFP
CFP
Long-range (20-year)
capital project needs
Packet Pg. 208
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities
2024-2029 CFP
Combined CFP & CIP Document
• Transportation
• Utilities
• Water
• Stormwater
• Sewer
• Facilities
• Wastewater Treatment Plant
• Comparison to previous year
a_
U
Packet Pg. 209
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities CFP & CIP
Citywide Project Maps
PWW-09 P'
1
PWT-a
PWT-17
P'A'T 24
-05
IT 44
PWT p3
PWT 4G
do[
:1
Packet Pg. 210
8.A.d
a_
U
a
U-
U
CFP & CIP Format
N
O
N
oject List
"
Capital
2024 Bu
Facilities
Decision Pa
Budet
Nun
Project
Numb
Amou nt
o:
TOTAL
(2024-2029)
a
Preservation / Maintenance Projects
o
PWT-01
Annual Street Preservation
$1,600,000 $2,400,000
$1,300,000 $2,630,000
$2.630,000
$2,630,000
$13,190,000
$39,450,000
$52,64
00
10
Program
=
PWT-03
76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th $20,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$2
10
St. SW to Olympic View Dr.ig
PWT-04
Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to
$789,553
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$789,553
$0
$78
a_
= 3
8th Ave.
0
PWT-05
Puget Dr. / OVD Signal Upgrades $0
$0
$0
$90,000
$496,000
$0
$586,000
$0
$58
r
10
PWT-06
Signal Upgrades - 100ttt Ave / $0
$0
$0
$165,000
$773,000
$0
$938,000
$0
$93
m
L 0
238th St. SW
a
PWT-07
Main St. / 3rd Signal Upgrades $0
$0
$0
$0
$110,000
$383,000
$493,000
$0
$49
0- 0
PWT-61
Olympic View Dr Overlay - 196th / $0 $200,000
$1,300,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$0
$1,50
c>
= 10
SR-524 to Talbot Rd
E
PWT-68
88th Ave Overlay and Sidewalk $150,000 $1,350,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$0
$1,50
0
Repair
r
Q
Safety / Capacity Analysis
a�
5
U
f6
Q
Packet Pg. 211
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities CFP & CIP
Project Sheets
Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets
Mamtains the City's pavemem infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital investment to rebuild City steels.
0mgn
5350,000 SI50,000 5150.000 5130,000 5330,000 5130p00 51.950,000
mgbt of way
Conitrurtpn
S1,a5a,000 52,250,00a 51,150000 52,SOD,O(p 52,SOD,00a 52,50apW 53],500,00a
Ea►e^.e Terel
$s.Eaaa6a $ir�.aaa $tjlDApp 521-100 S2.53%111100 Sliall,.0ap $39MDM
street Fund 332 -GES tat & bUti
—Fund 125
S1100,000 51150,00(1 565b" 5>50,000 S150.— 5—00a S31.250,000
0.Fe*Fund L6
$400,000 $)50,000 5650,000 51.000 STS0.b00 S150,000 531.250.000
mnsportatbn �mpaa Fels
Ge— Fund
stormuvter u01Ry Fund A22
Federal Grants
state Grains
umecved FUMing
590a,00a 51.130,au0 51.13a.0aa 51.—Coa 516.950,000
foadin9 aewae Ural
S1,500,000 S2,a0o,000 $1300,000 S2530,000 S2.M.000 $2,630,OW S39,a50,OW
MM"
Parks & Recreation
Lake Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA —D19
`- ' ., Is-P
.
I-M
' ! "All
Lake Ballinger Park, City of Mountlake Terrace
Project Summary: Through an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mountlake Terrace, the City of Edmonds will
support the Construction of the planned improvements in the northwest area of Lake Ballinger Park including a park
entry, pathways and access toLake Ballinger. The project is underway and payment is due upon completion of the
project.
Project luslifitution: This western boundary of the park is Edmonds dry limits and these improvements will provide
better access to Lake Ballinger Park for Edmonds residents. The revenue contribution supports me construction of the
improvements which will benefit the City of Edmonds. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and
Open Space (PROS) Plan including 3 Recommendations. 1 Goal and 3 Objectives. Recommendation 12 Expand
partnerships and agreements wah other nearby jurisdictions. Recommendation 3.6 Explore optransfor access to Lake
Ballinger with the Cn' of Mountlake Terrace to include possible joint development and Consideration of o fishing pier.
Recommendation 52 Repair and imprave or extend trails and boardwalks to allow improved public access to natural
arepsfar narure/wildlrfe viewing, hiking and outdoor experience. PROS Goal 3, Objec —3.2, 3.6 and 3.11.
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Comtruc[ion 1019)—IIA 5200.000 5200,000
Total E�evn $200,000 $200.000
Real Ertate Excise Tax ll - Fund 125 5200,000 5200,000
Tool Reverue $200,000 $200,000
1t
a_
U
a
U
N
O
N
N
0
N
INS
L
d
c
0
a
0
m
a�
c
c
'1
a
Packet Pg. 212
2024 Public Works Comprehensive Plan Updates
Transportation & Stormwater/Surface Water
FEHR�'PEERS
Comprehensive Transportation PLan
STORM AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
o s COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WORK IN
City of Edmonds
PROGRESS
OF ED4g0�0
�-
.111,.,r� J_ Inc. 1890
L.
City of Edmonds
- - -- Public Works Department/Engineering Division
1 Approved by City Council on
_ July 6, 2010
October 2010
Packet Pg. 213
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities —Transportation
2024 Pavement Preservation Projects
• 2024 Pavement Preservation Program ($1.5M)
• Construction - 6 Lane Miles
• 2025 Pavement Preservation Program ($100K)
• Design 2024; Construction 2025
• Main St. Overlay 6t" Ave — 8t" Ave ($790k)
• 2024 Construction
• $750K Federal Grant
• 11 New ADA Ramps
• 88tn Ave Overlay &Sidewalk Repair ($150K)
• Design 2024
• 76th Ave Overlay Close-out ($20k)
a_
U
K
Packet Pg. 214
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities —Transportation
2024 Safety &Capacity Projects
• Hwy 99 Revitalization/Gateway ($114K)
• Hwy 99 Stage 3 2441"St-238t"St ($1.2M)
• Hwy 99 Stage 4 224thSt-220t"St ($1.2M)
• 76th Ave/220th St Intersection ($650K)
• SR-104 Adaptive System ($186K)
• Traffic Signal Upgrades ($30K)
Packet Pg. 215
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities —Transportation
2024 Active Transportation Projects & Planning
• Transportation Plan Update($236K)
• 84t" Ave Walkway 238t" St — 234th St ($88K)
• Citywide Bicycle Improvements($15K)
• Elm Way Walkway($10K)
• Traffic Calming Program($100K)
• Pedestrian Safety Program ($80K)
a_
U
a
LL
U
N
O
N
N
CD
C
M
0
a
0
CO
Packet Pg. 216
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities — Utilities
2024 Water Utility
• 2024 Replacement Program ($3.3M)
• Construction 2024
• 41000 ft of Watermain Replacement
• 2025 Replacement Program ($426K)
• Design 2024; Construction 2025
• Yost & Seaview Reservoir Final Design ($850K)
• $3.5M-$4M rehabilitation cost for each Reservoir
• 2025-26 Construction
• Waterline Overlays ($225K)
o..`
y
a_
U
I L1
Packet Pg. 217
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities — Utilities
2024 Stormwater Utility
• Storm &Surface Water Comp Plan ($350K)
• Perrinville Creek Basin Projects
• Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration ($730K)
• Perrinville Creek Flow Mgmt ($100K)
• Perrinville Creek Basin Update ($594K)
• Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Impr ($90K)
• Lake Ballinger Floodplain Purchase ($120K)
• 2024 Replacement Program ($1.3M)
• Stormwater Overlays ($315K)
• 2025 Replacement Program ($324K)
a_
U
a
LL
U
N
O
N
It
N
O
CV
L
0
a
L
M
Lilt\ k
am
Packet Pg. 218
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities — Utilities
2024 Sewer Utility
• 2024 Replacement Program($2.01VI)
• 800 ft of Sewerline Replacement
• 2025 Replacement Program($363K)
• Cured in -place pipe rehabilitation ($522K)
• 41000 ft of sewer CIPP rehab
• Sewerline Overlays($60K)
2024 WWTP
• WWTP Annual Capital Replace ment($500K)
• Carbon Recovery Project($500K)
• Nutrient Removal Project($350K)
• Gasification Bypass($300K)
• Condition Assessment ($150K)
• Variable Frequency Drives(VFD) Upgrades ($250K)
• Primary Clarifier 2 Rehabilitation ($600K)
a_
U
a.
U_
U
N
O
N
N
O
N
L
0
w
a
0
CO
13
Packet Pg. 219
8.A.d
Public Works & Utilities — Facilities
• Boys & Girls Club
• Cemetery Building
• Historic Museum
• Library
• City Hall • Meadowdale Club House
• Fishing Pier • Old Public Works
• Frances Anderson Center • Parks Maintenance Bldg
• Fire Station 16
• Fire Station 17
• Fire Station 20
• Historic Log Cabin
• Public Safety
• Public Works O&M
• Wade James Theater
• Yost Pool House
a
aE,
a
r:,
N Q
Packet Pg. 220
8.A.d
CIP/CFP Schedule
July
• City staff begins development of capital budgets
August
• Submit proposed Capital budget to Finance
• Prepare draft CFP and CIP
September
• Joint Presentation City Council/Planning Board (September 19tn)
• Planning Board Public Hearing (September 27tn)
October
• City Council Public Hearing (October 3rd)
• City Council Discussion (October 17th)
• City Council Discussion/Approval (October 24tn)
November
• Adopt CFP w/ Budget into the Comprehensive Plan (November 21st)
a_
U
a
U-
U
N
O
N
N
O
N
CM
L
_
0
w
a
0
m
_
_
; 15
Packet Pg. 221
8.A.d
Questions
a_
U
a
U-
U
N
O
N
N
O
N
cm
C
L
LPL
0
w
V
a
L
M0
W
a
c
0
c
a�
d
L
a
M
2
C
d
E
V
cu
N a
a.+
V
Packet Pg. 222
Parks, Recreation & Human Services
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP
Angie Feser, Director
September 27, 2023
IL
v
a
a
Packet Pg. 223
8.A.e
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP Overview
Framework for CIP/CFP
Current/Ongoing Projects
Capital Projects — 2024 Highlighted
Projects
Programs
Acquisition
Changes
Packet Pg. 224
2024-2029 Parks CIP / CFP- FRAMEWORK
Department Staff Resources
PROS Plan Capital Recommendations
1. Acquisition to Fill Park System Gaps - Secure additional land for neighborhood parks to
address gaps
2. Open Space & Conservation Acquisitions - Pursue acquisitions that adjoin city properties or
conserve unique natural areas
3. Park Development & Enhancements — significant repairs needed for aging infrastructure
4. Yost Pool Replacement - Refine options for the replacement of Yost Pool
5. Trail Connections — Needed to help link destinations across the community
6. ADA, Accessibility & Other User Convenience Enhancements - Remove barriers and improve
universal access
IL
v �
a
a
0
w
a
Cn
CU
a
Packet Pg. 225
8.A.e
2024-2029 Parks CIP / CFP - FRAMEWORK
PROS Plan Goals (9)
1. ENGAGEMENT- Encourage and facilitate meaningful public involvement in park and recreation
planning.
2. DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION -Decrease barriers and provide increased opportunities for
participation and representative cultural, heritage and art programs, events representing the diversity
of Edmonds demographics.
3. PARKS, TRAILS & OPEN SPACE -Provide an interconnected park system that offers a wide variety of
year-round recreation opportunities and experiences which support and enhance Edmonds' cultural
identity and the natural environment.
4. WATERFRONT USE & ACCESS -Preserve and pursue opportunities to expand public access and
enjoyment of Edmonds' waterfront.
5. NATURAL RESOURCE & HABITAT CONSERVATION -Conserve and provide access to natural resource
lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education.
E
0 �
a
U_
CD
N
N
lzr
O
N
_
_
0
a
0
m
Im
_
a
a
_
0
w
a
Cn
CU
a
E
of EbAf t
v w
Packet Pg. 226
2024-2029 Parks CIP / CFP FRAMEWORK
PROS Plan Goals (Cont.)
6. CLIMATE CHANGE, ADAPTATION & RESILIENCY -Adopt to climate change and increase local park
system resiliency by improving environmental conditions, stewardship and sustainability in parks, trails,
open spaces and recreation facilities within planning, development, maintenance, and operations.
7. RECREATION PROGRAMS & FACILITIES -Provide a varied and inclusive suite of recreation opportunities
and experiences to promote health and wellness, year-round activity and social engagement.
8. CULTURAL SERVICES -Provide arts and cultural opportunities and experiences to promote an engaged
and vibrant community.
9. PARK OPERATIONS & ADMINISTRATION - Maintain and operate a modern, efficient park system that
provides a high level of user comfort, safety and aesthetic quality, and protects capital investments.
PROS Plan
G2—Obj2.6
G3—Obj3.8,3.10,3.11
G7— Obi 7.2
Rec. — 1.2, 6.2
Packet Pg. 227
8.A.e
2024 - 2029 Parks CIP / UP Geographic Distribution
Ps
Johnson Property
R3
Meadowdale Playllelds
D6
Mathay Ballinger Park
119,1141 R6, R31
Yost Park & Pool
D19
Lake Ballinger Park IMLTI
D8
[olumharium Expansion - Phase ll
RI
Olymplc Beach Park
DSD, Dll, D31
Pine street Park
RB
St.— Park
P3, D14
WMedron[ Walkway
Rl2
Maplewood Hill Park
P4, D9, DI
Edmonds Marsh Restoration
D36, D31, R14
Elm Street Park
P1, D2
Parks M.1—nince Bullding
R16
Seavlew Park
R35
Pool Replacement
Al
Edmonds Marsh Restoration
AS
Interurban Troll
R19
Shell Creek Restoration
D20
Woodway Campus Athletic
Complex
N—site specs lc projects
A2, P2, D23
Nelghborhoad park 5E1
N, P6,D15
Neighborhood Park SR99
A4, P1, D38
Neighborhood Park SE 2
R17
Ctywlde Park Improvements
R10
Signege& WWfihding
P4
•D1
D9
A2, P2, D13
A3,P6,D15
A4, P7, D18
R16
• r v
R17
R10
f.0
* Non -site specific projects
Neighborhood Park SE 1
Neighborhood Park SR99
Neighborhood Park SE 2
Citywide Park Improvements
Signage & Wayfinding
R4
RB
R11 R19
R16 • 7
R14
�R6
010 •
D12 ;' 2024 Projects
•
•D17
DB
L,7 I?19 2025 - 2029 Projects
• D6
AS \
Site speck projects only.
Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown.
v�A of EDAf
a_
U
a
a
U
rn
N
CD
It
N
O
N
Cl
C
L
N�
I.L
C
0
Q
0
m
.E
c
CU
a
Packet Pg. 228
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - FORMAT
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD*
D19
Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III
$ 200,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 200,000
Development. Payment due upon completion of project.
DS
Mathay Ballinger Park *CARRYFORWARD*
D6
Construction of improvements including permanent restroom, paved trail, picnic
$ 271,300
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 271,300
D7
shelter ADA access and other amenities.
Shell Creek Restoration *CARRYFORWARD*
R19
Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based
$ 120,000
$ 380,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 500,000
on study. Study in 2024, work in 2025.
R9
Yost Park & Pool
R4
Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include resurface of tennis courts
$ 154,300
$ 1,296,400
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,450,700
R6
and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs/replacement in 2024, inclusive
R11
iplaVground and pool upgrades in 2025.
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
D8
Expansion ofthe current colum barium. Funding provided throughthe Cemetery
$ -
$ 159,100
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 159,100
Trust Fund 137.
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting
X
D20
In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park
$ _
$ 1,500,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,500,000
and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and
future construction of two additional fields.
Neighborh nod Park SE 1
X
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds
$ -
$ 79,600
$ 819,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 899,100
D13
(funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
Sierra Park
R8
$ _
$ -
$ 415,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 415,000
Playground replacement and upgradeto inclusive standards.
R7
Olympic Beach Park
$ -
$ 20,000
$ 33,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 53,000
Renovation of existing restrooms.
IL
a
LL
U
0)
N
CD
NT
N
O
N
C
fC
d
C
O
rr
R,1
a
L
O
m
IM
C
a
C
t4
IL
C
Q)
E
of E04f t
�A V
w
� a
C
7�c. 189
s
R
a
Packet Pg. 229
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP Funding Overview
PARKS CIP REVENUE
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,000
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 9,500,000
Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 1,800,000
Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 1,290,000
Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - Columbarium Expansion
$ 159,100
$ 159,100
ARPA Contribution - Shell Creek Study
$ 120,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 120,000
Investment Interest (3%)
$ 18,918
$ 24,795
$ 30,849
$ 37,085
$ 43,507
$ 50,122
$ 205,277
Donations
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
$ -
Bond Proceeds
$
$
$
is
$
$
$ -
Secured Grants
$
$
$
I $
$ -
$
$
L�
L(E)TOTAL
Unsecured Grants/Funding- non -land acquisition
$
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,945,000
1 $ 5,481,200
$ 869,500
$ 24,756,800
$ 34,552,500
PARKS CIP REVENUE
$ 2,853,918
$ 3,898,895
$ 4,190,849
1 $ 7,733,285
$ 3,128,007
$ 27,021,922
$ 48,826,877
Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(F) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 3,150,795
$ 3,061,113
$ 1,316,908
$ 17,857
$ 1,214,742
$ 1,817,349
(E) Revenue
$ 2,853,918
$ 3,898,895
$ 4,190,849
$ 7,733,285
$ 3,128,007
$ 27,021,922
(D) Expenditures
$ 2,943,600
$ 5,643,100
$ 5,489,900
$ 6,536,400
$ 2,525,400
$ 26,559,455
(G) Ending Fund Balance (F+E-D)
$ 3,061,113
$ 1,316,908
$ 17,857
$ 1,214,742
$ 1,817,349
$ 2,279,817
M
a�
E
of E04f
�y 04,
t
V
w
Q
_
in` � Sao
s
R
Q
Packet Pg. 230
8.A.e
Current/Ongoing Capital Projects
)emolition
a
U
L
r-
0
s (2023-2024) a
L
MO
W
a
Packet Pg. 231
8.A.e
Current/Ongoing Capital Projects
,
a_
U
a
LL
U
rn
N
0
N
N
O
N
Cl
Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA
ftf
d
Parkland Acquisition Program
0
Deferred Maintenance/Small Capital Projects
BLN Shower replacement m
Cemetery Gate repair
Mathay Ballinger Apollo Swing replacem(
Park Restroom Doors (12) — automatic Ic a >
Viewer repairs
OUTS I OR INSIDE IN9DE OUTSIDE
In
T
21/a In. ■ ht ink i
-43I6In_� Y4 �2Y18 F.ti
v�y OF E DMo~�
Packet Pg. 232
Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP
PROJECTS
Highlight — 2024 projects
M
Packet Pg. 233
8.A.e
a
s
PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVIC
Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA- D19 (DP)
Boardwalk & Viewing Platform
Lake Ballinger
t
I
C
i
ftis
d
C
O
Q
L
MO
W
a
c
• Interlocal agreement to support development PROS Plan 2
of phase 3 which includes improved access for G3—Obi. 3.2, 3.8, 3.11
G5— Obi 5.2
Edmonds residents Rec.— 3.6 a
• Estimated Cost $200,000 49
Packet Pg. 234
8.A.e
Mathay Ballinger Park -D6 (CarryforwardlDP)
• ADA parking and paved pathway
• Shelter with Picnic Tables
• Permanent Restroom
• Estimated Total Cost: $499,300
a_
U
a
PROS Plan
G2- Obj 2.6
G3 - Obj 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8, 3.9
G9 - Obj 9.1
Rec.- 3.1,3.3,3.5, 6.2, 6.4
v�A of EDAf
Packet Pg. 235
8.A.e
Shell Creek Restoration- x19 (Carryforward)
• Study to determine scope & obtain permits - 2024
• Restorative work - 2025
• Estimated Cost $500,000
a_
U
a
PROS Plan
G3 - Obj 3.7, 3.8, 3.9
G4 - Obj 4.2, 4.4
G5 - Obj S.1, 5.3, 5.4
G6 - Obj 6.5
G9 - Obj 9.1, 9.2
Packet Pg. 236
8.A.e
Yost Park &Pool - R9, R41 R6, R11 (DP)
Construction (R4)—Trail/Bridge Repair
2024
$80,000
20251
127
2028
2029
Toti
$8i
Construction (R6)—Playground Replacement
$750,000
$75i
Construction (R9)—Tennis Court Resurface
$74,300
$7
Construction (R11) — Pool Upgrades
$546,400
$54
Total Expenses
$154,300
$1,296,400
$1,45,
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$154,300
$1,296,400
$1,45
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$154,300
1
$1,296,400
1
$1,45,
• Trail / Bridge Repair— 2024
• Tennis Court Resurface — 2024
• Playground Replacement - 2025
• Pool Upgrades — 2025
• Estimated Cost: $1,450,700
PROS Plan
G1 — Obj 1.1, 1.4
G3 — Obj 3.6, 3.8, 3.9
G4 — Obj. 4.4
G5— Obj 5.4
G6 — Obj 6.5
G9 — Obj. 9.1
Rec.— 3.1,3.4,3.10
Rec. — 6.2
a_
U
IL
Packet Pg. 237
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - PROJECTS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD*
D19
Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III
$ 200,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 200,000
Development. Payment due upon completion of project.
DS
Mathay Ballinger Park *CARRYFORWARD*
D6
Construction of improvements including permanent restroom, paved trail, picnic
$ 271,300
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 271,300
D7
shelter ADA access and other amenities.
Shell Creek Restoration *CARRYFORWARD*
R19
Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based
$ 120,000
$ 380,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 500,000
on study. Study in 2024, work in 2025.
R9
Yost Park & Pool
R4
Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include resurface of tennis courts
$ 154,300
$ 1,296,400
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,450,700
R6
and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs/replacement in 2024, inclusive
R11
iplaVground and pool upgrades in 2025.
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
D8
Expansion ofthe current colum barium. Funding provided throughthe Cemetery
$ -
$ 159,100
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 159,100
Trust Fund 137.
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting
X
D20
In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park
$ _
$ 1,500,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,500,000
and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and
future construction of two additional fields.
Neighborh nod Park SE 1
X
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds
$ -
$ 79,600
$ 819,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 899,100
D13
(funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
Sierra Park
R8
$ _
$ -
$ 415,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 415,000
Playground replacement and upgradeto inclusive standards.
R7
Olympic Beach Park
$ -
$ 20,000
$ 33,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 53,000
Renovation of existing restrooms.
C
Q)
E
of E04f t
�A V
w
� a
C
7�c. 189
s
R
a
Packet Pg. 238
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - PROJECTS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
D10
Pine Street Park
D11
Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables,
$ -
$ 40,000
$ 124,400
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 164,400
D12
canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway.
Johnson Property
R2
Master plan forfuture park use. Site development not included in estimate.
$ -
$ -
$ 82,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 82,000
PS
Demolition, debris removal and site security completed in 2023.
Neighborhood Park SR99
•
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$ -
$ -
$ 82,000
$ 844,100
$ -
$ -
$ 926,100
D15
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
X
P1
Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building
$ _
$ -
$ 1,125,500
$ 4,637,100
$ -
$ -
$ 5,762,600
D2
Replace and/or renovate shop facilities located in City Park.
R12
Maplewood Hill Park
$ _
$ _
$ -
$ 347,800
$ -
$ -
$ 347,800
Playground replacement.
Neighborhood Park SE 2
X
D18
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 84,400
$ 869,500
$ -
$ 953,900
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
Waterfront Walkway
P3
Connectingthe waterfront walkwayfrom Brackett's Landing North to
$
$
$
$ 515,000
$ 819,500
$ 1,334,500
D14
Marina Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide
-
_
_
S _
Condominiums, to provide ADA improvements.
R16
Seaview Park
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ 417,900
$ -
$ 417,900
Replacement of permanent restroom to provide ADA upgrades.
D16
Elm Street Park
D17
Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground,
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ 100,000
$ 340,370
$ 440,370
R14
small shelter with picnic tables and habitat restoration.
r
C
d
E
of E04f t
�A j V
v f4
w
� a
C
7oc. 189
s
R
a
Packet Pg. 239
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP - PROJECTS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
X
R15
Pool Replacement
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ -
$ 23,881,000
$ 23,881,000
Replacement of the existing Yost pool. Design, location, and funding TBD.
Meadowdale Playfields
R3
Renovations as suggested by the City of Lynnwood and consistent with re-
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$
negotiated and updated Interlocal Agreement. May include addition of dugout
-
roofs, light replacement and playground upgrade.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
Master Plan development and implementation of the Edmonds Marsh to daylight
P4
the waterway connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and twofresh
X
D9
water creeks providing restoration of freshwater/salt water estuary and natural
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$ -
D1
tidal exchange. (All expenses are TBD per Council direction in December 2022).
Acquisition funding identified in Parkland Acquisition program.
(A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS
1 $ 745,600
$ 3,475,100
$ 2,6874 00
$ 5,913,400
$ 1,902,40
$ 25,0 00,870
$ 33,070,070
a�
E
of E04f t
�A V
v f4
w
Q
C
O
189 E
s
R
a
Packet Pg. 240
Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP
PROGRAMS
Highlight — 2024 projects
Packet Pg. 241
0
IL
Signage & Wayfinding - R10 (DP)
_
Trail identification, orientation markers, safety & regulatory messagin 2
park hours, park rules and etiquette, interpretive information and
warning signs. a
Estimated Cost: $75,000 PROS Plan
G2 — Obj. 2.1, 2.3 Y
CU
F G3 — Obi. 3.6 a
G5 — Obi. 5.3, 5.4
PARK HOURS-..
G9 — Obj. 9.1 r
Rec. — 6.2, 6.5 E
DUSK
to
�q 1 E
s
R
a
Packet Pg. 242
8.A.e
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP - PROGRAMS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project (4) Programs
PARKS CIP PROGRAMS 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total
R17
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular and deferred maintenance,
repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment.
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 2,700,000
signage m waynnamg
R10 Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a
consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system.
Parkland Acquisition Support
Funds utilized to evaluate potential acquisitions and complete due diligence.
Debt Service and Interfund Transfers
Debt service on Civic Park $1.61M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to
Engineering for Capital Project Support.
I SUBTOTAL- PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
$ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ 75,000
5 50,000 $ 50,000 5 50,000 5 .50,000 $ 50,000 5 50,000 $ 300,000
$ 123,000 j $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 1 $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 1 $ 738,000
a_
U
a
LL
U
rn
N
0
N
N
O
N
C1
L
d
C
0
..P
U
Q
L
O
m
a1
C
C
a
Packet Pg. 243
8.A.e
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - PROGRAMS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
�
PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
R17
Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular and deferred maintenance,
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 2,700,000
repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment.
Signage & Wayfinding
R10
Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a
$ 75,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 75,000
consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system.
Parkland Acquisition Support
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 300,000
Funds utilized to evaluate potential acquisitions and complete due diligence.
Debt Service and Interfund Transfers
Debt service on Civic Park $1.61M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 738,000
Engineering for Capital Project Support.
(B)SUBTOTAL- PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
$ 698,000
$ 623,000
$ 623,000
$ 623,000
$ 6237000
$ 623,000
$ 3,813,000
(4) Programs
Packet Pg. 244
Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP
PARKLAND ACQUISITIONS
Highlight — 2024 project
M
Packet Pg. 245
8.A.e
Parkland Acquisition - a2, A3, A4 (No DP -Council Authorization)
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (A2)
..
$1,500,000
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
Total
Acquisition —Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3)
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4)
Total Expenses
$1,500,000
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126
$1,300,000
Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD
Total Revenue
$1,300,000
• Neighborhood Parks SE1
• Acquisition as Feasible
• Estimated Cost: $1,500,00
N
Y
i
PROS Plan
a
G2 — Obj. 2.1
G3 — Obj. 3.1,
3.2, 3.3, 3A
Rec. —1.1
E
v
a
E
a
Packet Pg. 246
8.A.e
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
tf
PARKLAND ACQUISITION
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
X
A2
Neighborhood Park SE 1
$ 1,500,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,500,000
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
X
A3
Neighborhood Park SR99
$ -
$ 1,545,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,545,000
Acquisition of parkland near SR 99.
X
A4
Neighborhood Park SE 2
$ -
$ -
$ 2,185,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,185,500
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
AS
Interurban Trail
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 895,585
$ 895,585
Acquisition for trail extension.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
X
Al
Acquisition ofthe Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh
TBD
TED
TED
TED
TED
TED
$ -
restoration.
(C)SUBTOTAL- PARKLAND ACQUISITION
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,545,000
$ 2,185,500
$
$
$ 895,585
$ 6,126,085
Packet Pg. 247
8.A.e
Changes to CIP/CFP
CFP 1 CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
PROJECTS ADDED
Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
None
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
PROJECTS REMOVED
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
I DESCRIPTION
Parks
Lake Ballinger Access (McAleer)
Project completion scheduled in 2023
Parks
Johnson Property Demolition
Demolition to be complete in 2023
Parks
Playground Upgrade Program
IPlayground upgrades identified each year, no need for additional program
CFP 1 CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
CHANGE
Parks
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
Funded through Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - scheduled in 2025 vs. 24
Parks
Elm Street Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2027 and construction in 2028 vs. 2026
Parks
Interurban Trail Expansion
Moved to 2029 vs. 28
Parks
Johnson Property Master Plan
Removed demolition, master plan scheduled in 2026 vs. 25
Parks
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA
ILA completed in 2023; payment due upon construction completion in 2024, carryforward
Parks
Maplewood Hill Park
Playground replacement moved to 2027 vs. 25, significant price increase
Parks
Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements
permanent restroom installation scheduled to take place in 2024, carr forward
Parks
Neighborhood Park SE1, SR99, SE2
X
Master plan and construction of all three parks pushed back one year must acquire first
Parks
Olympic Beach Park Improvements
Se arated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24
Parks
Parkland Acquisition/Neighborhood Parks
X
All three bumped back one year to 2024, 2025 and 2026
Parks
Pine Street Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24
Parks
Seaview Park Improvements
Restroom replacement moved to 2028 vs. 27
Parks
Shell Creek Restoration
Plan carried forward to 2024, restoration in 2025 vs. 24
Parks
Si na e and Wayfinding
Price increase to $75K vs. $51,500
Parks
Yost Park & Pool Improvements
Playground replacement moved to 2025 vs. 23, significant price increase due to topography
a_
U
a
li
U
rn
N
CD
It
N
O
N
c
cm
d
c
O
c�
Q
O
m
Z31
c
c
cts
a
C
O
O
C
d
N
d
i
a
N
Y
i
a
Iq
r
C
N
a
Packet Pg. 248
8.A.e
Questi,
ons?
a_
U
Iq
r
c
a�
E
of ED,f t
v�A v o~N V
a
C
t
V
El
Packet Pg. 249
9.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/11/2023
Landmark 99 Project Overview
Staff Lead: Susan McLaughlin
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Deb Powers
Background/History
Planning efforts over the last two decades in the Highway 99 area have resulted in infrastructure
investments, new multi -family developments and a satellite City Hall office. Whilst this is good progress,
some of the most critical needs for neighborhoods in the Highway 99 area are still not met, notably
open space and community gathering places (community center/recreation). City staff have been
actively looking for properties to purchase to meet these needs; we are pleased to bring forward an
exciting site with significant potential to meet a multitude of community needs.
The Highway 99 Landmark Site is unique because of its size at 10.55 acres under a single landowner. It is
comprised on 9 parcels with access from Highway 99 and 240th St SW with close proximity to the
interurban trail, Swift bus rapid transit service and the upcoming light rail station in Mountlake Terrace.
Staff Recommendation
This is a project briefing; no action by Planning Board is necessary.
Narrative
On June 27t", 2023, the City Council approved an option agreement on the 10.06-acre site, frequently
referred to as the Burlington Coat Factory building. This option agreement puts the City on a two-
year timeline to make a decision on whether or not to close on the property.
Staff has been in an initiation and research phase of the project since the Council approval of the
Option Agreement in late June. We have developed the project organizational structure, researched
case studies and development options, launched a community outreach process, and mapped out
the near -term timeline- recognizing the importance of sequencing and co -dependencies.
A community conversation is scheduled for October 21, 2023 to learn more about the site and to
obtain feedback from the community on what public uses are desirable on the site.
All of this information will inform Council's decision on whether to move forward with the purchase
and sale agreement by the end of this year.
Packet Pg. 250
9.B
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/11/2023
Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement Review
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michael Clugston
Background/History
The City of Edmonds kicked off a robust community visioning process for the Comprehensive Plan
update with a six -week themed outreach campaign over the summer 2022. Over 8,500 comments were
received via survey, email and in person commentary throughout the process, which included a range of
activities in different areas throughout the City.
After the six week engagement period, City staff drafted a community vision statement directly from the
initial 8,500 comments; we wanted to authentically represent the collective view and to remain inclusive
and representative. The vision statement is accompanied by the illustrative graphic that depicts the key
themes and sentiments heard over the six week period (attachment 2).
In September 2023, Council passed Resolution 1529, tasking the Planning Board to engage in further
review of the draft Comprehensive Plan vision statement. The Planning Board is requested to provide a
recommendation to Council about the vision statement by November 30, 2023, which could include
adopting the statement as -is or a revised statement. Staff is also bringing forward an alternative action,
which is to remove the statement from the Comprehensive Plan materials at this time.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that the vision statement be removed from the Comprehensive Planning materials so
that we can focus on complex policy discussions that we are mandated to develop by the end of 2024.
The community vision statement itself is not required as an element of the Plan per the Growth
Management Act. Staff initiated the visioning process to generate awareness in the project and to
engage with as many people as possible about the future of Edmonds. We achieved that goal.
We will continue to develop content in collaboration with community, boards and commissions, and
elected officials, and we will build from the 8,500 comments in an authentic way to advance the
resultant themes that we heard. The visioning process and the corresponding illustrative graphic
(attachment 2) that depicts key themes is effective at conveying the key issues to inform the next phase
of the Plan.
Per Resolution 1529, the Planning Board should discuss the original draft vision statement and
associated word cloud, together with the visioning survey results, and the Bloom revision to the draft
(Attachments 2 - 5). In addition, staff requests that Planning Board consider an alternative action, which
is to remove the statement from the Plan materials at this time.
Narrative
Packet Pg. 251
9.B
N/A
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Resolution 1529
Attachment 2 - CP_Visioning_lllustration_Final
Attachment 3 - wordcloud combined comments for website
Attachment 4 - Edmonds Visioning Survey Summary
Attachment 5 - Joan Bloom proposed Vision Statement
Attachment 6 - Council minutes of 8.2.23, 7.5.23 and 10.25.22
Attachment 7: CC_23.8.2 Comp Plan Vision.Next Steps
Packet Pg. 252
9.B.a
RESOLUTION NO. 1529
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR FINALIZING THE CITY OF
EDMONDS 2024 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VISION
STATEMENT
WHEREAS, a Vision Statement is a legislative policy; and
WHEREAS, the Council is the legislative branch of government with the authority to set policy;
and
WHEREAS, a State requirement does not require a Vision Statement to be part of the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, much outreach was done to gather inputs on the community vision; and
WHEREAS, data was collected in a fair and representative way during this outreach; and
WHEREAS, the Administration, Council, and public all want to honor the inputs and have a
Vision Statement for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update process that represents those inputs;
and
WHEREAS, the Council is dissatisfied that an ambiguous term in the Vision Statement was not
defined in the initial validation survey issued; and
WHEREAS, the validation survey of the public as to whether the City got the Vision Statement
right generated only 150 responses, and those were evenly split 5 1 % "yes" to 49% "no"; and
WHEREAS, the community provided more validation input in a public hearing on August 2,
2023 and in other input processes since concerning how the vision statement could be edited to
better represent the inputs from the community engagement; and
WHEREAS, the Council wants to make sure the community's true values and vision are guiding
our 2024 Comprehensive Plan process by ensuring the vision statement accurately reflects the
citizen input submitted, and reflects the best iterative process, rather than finalized with first
draft;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the vision statement validation inputs (from the August 2, 2023 public hearing and
other) be considered by staff for best representation of the original data collected, and
then the staff s second draft, modified or not from the first, be sent to the Planning Board
and Council as soon as possible, but not later than October 11, 2023.
2. That the word cloud, Edmonds Visioning Survey results, the original draft vision
statement, and the Bloom revision of the draft vision statement will be provided to the
Packet Pg. 253
9.B.a
Planning Board in their board packet, as soon as possible, but not later than October 11,
2023.
3. That the Planning Board will provide feedback and recommendations to the City Council
about which of the versions to adopt ("as is" or with suggested revisions) as soon as
possible, but not later than November 30, 2023.
4. That the revised draft Vision Statement will then come to Council for approval, and
5. That the Council will approve and make final the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan
Update Vision Statement as soon as possible, but no later than the last Council meeting of
2023, for the purposes of guiding the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update work by the staff,
consultants, and any other parties guiding or leading the update process.
RESOLVED this 51h day of September 2023.
CITY OF EDMONDS
Jr
MAYOR, MIKE NELSOI
ATTEST:
C CLERK, C ASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: September 1, 2023
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: September 5, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. 1529
Packet Pg. 254
_ r
r -
r
• • r r 1
••r 1
• r r � 1
I•• 1
A 1
1 1
1 - 1
1 1
1
I r r
r -
__rr- Phan
VoicesVision
WMr WE HEAR
"EOM0�10S i S A VOL
1D WE. MA 44TA,
MO QE. VX-E."
WNgr Do Yoa
r
b\AQpswus RQ�9!0 ADOUF DIM
LXT�i i FUEL OUZIS
GN ATS - = O
W�Y �naFs VISIOtJ
009 0�
taBlE
' AT WL
-�vENrs MU-U96AL
;v-4 . CC-
NR��IP
D40S ?
—�iri vvxr.nvwi �
a
1-
AaoE56 TD
on 4
�AVJ 10� -7sn�
., \ 1,
414" M FATAL 1
SUN��(s
b�
uv�k,v�iVry
GELE RQAT A
DIVFkSIT�
A W THE CITI of CDA000.5
-TOUI� ATMOSPHERE
I rV Al 1'14_
,� �RAF1� VISION 5TATEMENT
"EDMONDS IS A WELCOMING CITY
OFFERING OUTSTANDING QUAU7`f OF LIFE FORgLL
WEVALUE EMI IRON MENTAL &TEWARL)SHIPi VIBRANTAND U1\JERSF—NEiC-?H&09600D5,
L% SAFEAND HEALTHY STREETS, AND A THRIVW6AR755CENE. WEARE ENGAGED RESIL)ENTS
f / �/ W 0 TAKEQP�1R21IsNAPING uu2RESL
1 IeNFJFUkI "r
w1w WE
L lk��uw�
w�OM0�W5 �I�I �I/ 4� c�,aymr2n���o s� � U fl2D1�c,TlD� �
A(VAc-m-�gR�
T L L
l c t < < ICJ LyUulUU�O or Ta5leCT
s,�1414�
ASSESS BVILPING STYLE
FOR MIDDLE INICOME. d0c6EHOLOS
0� ��0N4MIC GRd�
'0I
PD YDU wgK�
W EOMW6'
-7Qk
3�90 357o Cl
��
BRING TNEM�
"Suer wquTb
W�I:��IL IT�(A� Va5TIAnl ggss ViA v ��R 1
PAQuC KI(tIiT - AF—
Y '' 6
�v is Iln�uf�:
r� C�wo�y cos
�ucar�s�o �2arrc.
MAWTAt AND ROOPL1
SPIKIFICALN 1REE5 MU
E111K I C IT`(Q44
ULTOkE KY&S
yF�15117 �� int
SOl,U11p�1:
?AeNFk WiTO
El*,G , COO PAl.
mwoa�r+ cnmEs
CU�tUR� ➢�iV�
�n►no�
WA"iIIIIII[, bwUK"fS
SuS%�ABv, galwKs
E PAVIROKMEMT WC
OAOLAND ou
z
s ta&A
%SUAS vr
c� lac, brav,
aid G04
AvSW DIVERSITy ago NQ
IDE OF WWMTOUON EDWMD6 (THE
�.� CCU( r �KE�Ep��� ��� (�(� f�l � tag„W IVWN
�Lit`�
L L L
• �,��� (lA�Mo5PH62E
L L
v,� " � MOQEi�aUC
MAD
AN 0 34F�P%f
PEDPLE
L)
SP. WALKABILITI
10 RABLIL T-
9.B.b
t Pg. 255
wu _
c�tnta�,e _
sJ6 �refa
O �
MW
ir
Cos$cc�!4�_
A / 4.A/ i
r- a- iJ,m
414
&�
13o�ui ".�. uKi�ooc o+ee - rRo.,,� _
.�.
Y- w eta 4 ,� TL
ILA fob
44
Dewer -16
-
¢--
9.B.d
CITY OF EDMONDS COMP PLAN VISION
"Everyone's Edmonds" Public Survey Overview
10/10/2022
In preparation for the update to the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, city staff sought to gather
public input from across the city. The City of Edmonds staff distributed surveys across the city to gather
insight on people's current experiences and ideas for the future of Edmonds to see where the upcoming
Comprehensive Plan update should focus. Surveys were promoted online and posters with a QR Code
were hung throughout the city at key gathering spaces. Surveys were available through Survey Monkey
using a combination of multiple choice and short answer questions. In -person outreach was conducted
at events and meetings using a written survey form. A full list of questions and a workbook of all survey
questions is available to view individual responses. Key themes from each of the surveys are described
below by topic.
Process
Six mini surveys, each focusing on different topics, gathered respondents' insight, aspirations, and
concerns for the City of Edmonds' future. The topics referred to: identity, quality of life, economic
growth, environment, culture, and livability and land use. Each survey had two to four questions that
included both qualitative (open ended, written response) and quantitative (multiple choice) input. Mini
surveys were time limited and available to the public for one week at a time. At the conclusion of each
week a full, combined survey was offered while a new mini survey on the next topic became available.
This City staff chosen strategy aimed to increase engagement and make posters advertising the mini
surveys evergreen.
TopicsSurvey
Week 1 Identity <jump to section>
.. .
135
Week 2 Quality of Life <jump to section>
120
Week 3 Economic Growth <jump to section>
50
Week 4 Environment <jump to section>
75
Week 5 Culture <jump to section>
54
Week 6 Livability and Land Use <jump to section>
104
Full survey
536
Events and conversations (written) <jump to section>
410
Tally
1584
Input from surveys with open-ended response questions were categorized, as much as possible, into
eight key themes which were chosen for compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan focus areas as
defined by the Edmonds planning team. Some surveys have additional subcategories to capture the full
breadth of information. Overarching themes are:
- Community Culture and Urban Design
- Community Sustainability
- Economic Development
- Housing
- Land Use
Packet Pg. 257
9.B.d
Parks & Recreation and Open Spaces
Transportation
Unknown (other)
Participation by neighborhood
Neighborhood identifiers were offered for online survey along with an "Other" category with the option
to write in a neighborhood not listed. A majority of respondents to online surveys selected the
neighborhood location of Downtown Edmonds "the "Bowl" (375) followed by Westgate (105) and
Seaview (85). 101 respondents selected other, with a strong presence from Maplewood.
The following table does not include locations of respondents from 'live" conversations written comments.
Downtown Edmonds
(the "Bowl")
Week
50
Week
47
Week
18
Week
I
38
Week
5
14
Week
6
30
Full
Survey
177
Tally
374
Esperance
(unincorporated
county)
3
2
0
0
1
5
21
32
Firdale
6
2
0
2
1
5
10
26
Five Corners
12
11
2
5
8
8
29
75
Highway 99
6
3
3
1
2
5
12
32
Lake Ballinger
3
3
2
3
1
3
14
29
Meadowdale
2
3
1
1
1
3
14
25
Perrinville
7
4
1
3
1
4
20
40
Pine Ridge
5
7
3
2
4
4
15
40
Seaview
7
11
6
6
5
11
39
85
Sherwood Forest
2
3
2
1
2
3
10
23
Talbot Park
0
2
2
1
1
1
2
9
Town of Woodway
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
Maplewood
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
Not
optioned
0
0
Westgate
17
9
5
4
5
12
53
105
1 do not live in
Edmonds
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
8
Other
14
12
5
8
8
8
46
101
No answer
67
Tally (no "live"
comments)
135
120
50
75
54
104
536
1074
Locations identified in the "other" comments include Emerald Hills, Gateway/99&104, Lynwood, Madrona,
Maplewood, Macrons, North of Woodway, Olympic between Main and Caspers, Point Edwards, Richmond Beach,
South side, south near Woodway Yost Park, University Colony, Uptown, West of WINCO, 238th & Edmonds Way,
240th/104 South Edmonds.
Packet Pg. 258
9.B.d
Week 1 Identity: What does Edmonds mean to you?
Q1: What do you love about Edmonds?
Key themes
- Edmonds has a walkable "small town charm" with access to waterfront and nature, pretty
views, and quiet neighborhoods with trees where children can play.
- Respondents commented positively on the recreation available in Edmonds and its walkability,
especially in the downtown core.
- Respondents commented on the value of the small businesses of Edmonds, especially the feel of
a historic small town with a bustling center, local shops, restaurants and a thriving arts and
culture scene.
Q2: How would you like to see your values reflected in Edmonds?
Key themes
- Community Sustainability was a large category with comments highlighting both environmental
sustainability and community health.
o Environmental sustainability focused on environmental protection and climate change
of which respondents mentioned the importance of restoring and maintaining habitat,
protecting the watershed and marine life, reduced impact of land development, and an
increased tree canopy
o Community Health reflected some respondents' desires to see more diversity of people,
community non -profits supported, law enforcement protected, volunteerism fostered,
and members of the unhoused community supported. Others expressed the desire to
keep Edmonds the same as it is with no change.
- Respondents commented on the economic and governmental future of the City and made
specific remarks regarding the City's management of infrastructure funds (police, fire,
emergency services, social service) and accountability to businesses.
- There were disparate comments regarding the development of Edmonds: many respondents
opposed high -density and high-rise buildings in favor of land preservation and small-scale
neighborhood buildings. Affordable housing for all income levels was a recurring comment.
- Many responses support better connectivity of neighborhoods through public transportation,
bike lanes, and sidewalks.
- Multiple commenters include encouragement to create opportunities for a more equitable,
inclusive, welcoming, and culturally diverse city. This includes requests for more community
events, increased social services, and support for small businesses outside of the "Bowl".
Packet Pg. 259
9.B.d
Week 2 Quality of life: Why do you live or play in Edmonds?
Q1- What do you like about living in Edmonds? Select all that apply.
120 respondents (mini survey), 509 respondents full survey
600
500
400
300
200
1000
■ ■
'
°°eta
�tayoJ et�a`�t�
o�ro� °theme �a
o°\a\yar0
Key themes
Within the option of "other", comments included appreciation of the arts and culture scene, symphony,
and library, proximity and access to natural resources and environment, parks and trails, walkability and
cleanliness, events and farmers markets, infrastructure (public utilities and police, emergency services),
and a sense of community. Access to natural resources and beauty were the most frequent comments
along with Edmonds' proximity to a large metropolitan area, Seattle, while still having a "small town"
feel.
Q2: Is there anything you don't like about Edmonds?
Key themes
Transportation and walkability - Many comments referred to Edmonds being car -centric, a lack
of sidewalks, and the need for improved walkability/bike-ability along with more transit options,
Street safety and its implications for the safety of pedestrians and cyclists was mentioned often.
Additionally, respondents talked about the need for better public transportation, specifically if
you are not a Seattle 9-5 commuter. The subcategory "automotive" was used to group recurring
themes of speeding, traffic, and parking.
a. Motorists that speed make roadways dangerous for drivers and non -drivers
b. There is not enough parking in some neighborhoods, while there is too much parking in
certain neighborhoods making them unwalkable. Parking needs to be assessed
specifically by neighborhood needs.
Packet Pg. 260
9.B.d
c. Navigating traffic is difficult and seems to be getting worse, and the ferry traffic often
exacerbates the current conditions.
2. Government - There is an overall expression that local government does not equitably distribute
funding and there is not enough investment in areas outside of "the Bowl". Comments included
opinions that there is a lack of governmental transparency and accountability, problematic lack
of agreement within government, and that only select, privileged communities are listened to.
3. Many respondents acknowledged that the lack of diversity in Edmonds was an issue, while
others expressed resistance to change.
4. There is a mixed response to the Land Capacity of Edmonds, with some respondents saying that
increased density is something they dislike, and some saying there is not enough housing.
5. The impact of urbanism on environment was expressed with concerns about trees (lack of, care
of existing, trees too big and blocking views) and preservation and restoration of marshland.
Access to pools is mentioned frequently as related to both recreation and increasing climate
temperatures.
6. Many respondents expressed that housing is not affordable for low- and middle -income
households, young families, singles, and seniors. Some responders are concerned that there will
be fewer single-family homes built and an increasing focus on condos that disrupts the small-
town atmosphere.
7. Comments included concern about the increasing number of people who are unhoused.
8. Increased cost of living as a whole and specifically increased rents for commercial business that
make it difficult for small business owners was a concern. Recurring comments on the condition
of the Highway 99 area and the need for investment in this vital commercial corridor were
prominent.
9. Concerns were expressed about recent increases of crime.
Q3: How long have you lived in Edmonds? 120 respondents mini survey, 509 respondents full survey
Residency in years
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1
Less than 1 1-2 3-5 6 - 10 11- 15 16 - 25 26 - 35 36 - 50 More than I do not live
50 in Edmonds
Packet Pg. 261
9.B.d
Week 3: Help us plan Edmonds' economic future!
Q1: What kind of businesses (goods and services) do you travel outside the city for?
3
Key themes °'
0
1. Lynwood and University Village are destinations for shopping. Specific mentions of retailers
r
included Alderwood Mall, Central Market, Costco, Fred Meyer, Home Depot, JoAnn's Fabrics, E
Lowe's, Macy's, Nordstrom, Office Depot, REI, Target, Trader Joe's, and Whole Foods.;
2. Respondents expressed the sentiment that big -box and large retail stores are not needed in 4n
M
Edmonds — it's ok to travel for some things. _
0
.N
�a
Goods and services sought outside of the city a
a�
160 _
d
t
140 L
CL
120 E
O
U
100
80
60
40
20
0
,
09
0
e
�t
r
etJ�
� e
oe ce �a
Cie Ito a��r
�e
�o�e
a
�
�ey�ao
o�a\ye
5`
�e5
Qto
"General Purposes" is the most common category for goods and services sought outside the city. Within
that category, the following are notable comments:
• Air travel
• Community: religious centers and houses of worship, cultural connection, LGBTQIA+
• Daycare/nursery
• Education — STEM, tutoring
• Ethnic grocers, and household goods
• Entertainment — music performances, theater, museums, theaters, sporting events, kid's
entertainment
• Parks, athletics, pools, gyms, sports leagues, dance class
• Auto service, tires
Packet Pg. 262
9.B.d
• Library, books
• Major purchases — household furnishings, electronics, appliances, vehicles
• Salon: hair, nails, massage
• Sporting and camping goods, craft supplies, specialty hobby supplies, cycling supplies and repair
• Restaurants — ethnic, vegan, sushi, fine dining
• Veterinarian / pet care
Q2: Do you work in Edmonds? 50 respondents mini survey, 477 respondents full survey
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Q2b: If you don't work in Edmonds, what kind of work do you leave the city for?
Employment sought outside of the city
140
120
100
80
60
40
20 ■ 1 ■ I I _ _ ■ 1 ■ 1 1
ate �arc �a\ °�• °ey ta\ �°o ea Q, e
G tea E'er �e y�ta� c�etJ` e � �\t �e r°�
�� a\ t\
\ tt` o e Q
eyy.°
o�etcg�a•�
CP
O
3
Packet Pg. 263
9.B.d
Key themes
Many respondents to the question of employment location do not work in Edmonds with almost half of
non -employed respondents citing "retired". Neighborhoods largely represented by retirees include
Downtown Edmonds (the `Bowl"), Seaview, Five Corners, and Westgate.
The following categories have notable subcategories:
• Education: schoolteacher, professor, education support staff, library
• Healthcare: physician, nursing, tech, speech therapist, research, dentist, radiology/imaging
• Office management and administration: administrative, analyst, corporate, environment,
general office work, human resources, real estate, non-profit, management, program
management, wealth management, urban planner
• Other / general: art, retail, restaurant/food service/bar
• Tech: bio, digital, mechanical, medical, research, science, software
Packet Pg. 264
9.B.d
Week 4: Environment: What can we do to reduce Edmonds'
environmental impact?
Within the topic of Environment, subcategories included:
- Affordable Housing
- Automotive
- Bicycling
- Climate Change - Global warming, heat, wildfires, air quality
- City Revenues - Equitable investments in community, the City's control of environmental plans,
natural disaster preparedness
- Green Space - tree coverage
- Land Capacity - Overpopulation, population density, unsustainable development, development
in general, zoning, density in general
- Open Space - untouched land
- Other — no answer, nothing of concern, or an answer that did not align with other categories
- Parks
- Public Transportation
- Renewable Infrastructure - Carbon footprints, renewable energy, greenhouse gas emissions,
compost, recycling, EVs
- Vegetation and Wildlife
- Water Protection - Clean water supply, rising sea levels, natural resource protection, pollution
and contamination, stormwater runoff, Puget Sound health, Edmonds Marsh
Q1: Which of these four proposed priorities of the Edmonds Climate Action Plan should the City put
the most resources toward? (rank in order of importance from one to four, with the most important
being one) 75 respondents mini survey, 486 respondents full survey
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
Rank 1 - 4
Buildings and energy Transportation Environment Lifestyles and
consumption
Packet Pg. 265
9.B.d
Key themes
Environment has the highest ranking with an average of 2.8, followed closely by buildings and energy
with an average ranking of 2.6
Q2 What are you most concerned about when it comes to the environmental future of Edmonds?
Key themes
The category of "Water Protection" was the most common theme, embodying the community's
concern over rising sea levels, protection of local streams and water sources, and pollution of
watersheds from littering and untreated stormwater runoff. A common note among those citing
water as a primary concern was the Edmonds Marsh and the desire to see it returned to a
healthy estuary.
Another highly common theme was "Green Space," and reference to Edmonds' tree canopy.
Many respondents expressed disappointment to see trees cut down in favor of development
and want to see trees planted or replaced. It is important to note comments from other
surveys include "right tree, right place" thinking (trees that -are too large for the space or block
viewsheds.)
In the category of "Land Capacity" population density is a leading theme. There are divergent
opinions over whether density is a solution or a problem. Most commonly, respondents
considered increased density in zoning, population, and development to be harmful to the
environment, often naming increased cars, traffic, and climate refugees as an outcome. Others
saw density as a solution, citing the opportunity for more walkable communities and sustainable
buildings as an outcome.
Packet Pg. 266
9.B.d
Week 5 Culture: Help us better understand Edmonds' diversity!
Q1: Do you feel like your ethnicity and culture are represented in Edmonds? What ethnicity(s) and
culture(s) would you like to see better represented in Edmonds
Key themes
Many responses were left blank, but for those that responded, most common answer was yes,
their culture is represented. Of those yeses that provided further detail, a large majority
respondent group self -identified as white.
The category "Needs more" was included to highlight those who did not self -identify themselves
as feeling represented/not represented, and only commented on which cultures they think need
better representation and how. Of those, "all non -white cultures" were named the most, and
the second highest identified were Indigenous/Native American cultures.
A significant number of respondents declined to answer the question, commenting that the
question is divisive and/or that the government should not be asking.
Q2: What can the City do to better celebrate diverse cultures?
Key themes
Respondents requested that the City thoughtfully partner with ethnic and cultural minority
communities to host more events that honor holidays that aren't in the white dominant culture
and to think of creative ways to honor cultural presence through events, fairs, festivals, public
artwork, signage, programs for youth, and cultural centers.
The "City revenues" category related to various government structure solutions that the City
could take on to address diversity, such as improving hiring practices, increasing diverse
representation in elected or appointed positions, supporting small businesses, installing
streetscape design that acknowledges culture, heritage, and language, and developing
partnerships with community- based organizations.
Packet Pg. 267
9.B.d
Week 6 Livability and Land Use: What should Edmonds offer the next
generation?
Q1: What types of housing could you see fitting into your neighborhood? Select all that apply. 104
respondents mini survey, 467 respondents full survey
Housing
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
1500
0
e'
ate`° ay �e+
p`� \� y air \fir �yot or° �t.Q
I'd
ao� °&Aaa y°Ka
ova eyh o
a�
O
Key themes
Der
Single family homes is the most frequently selected category for desired housing followed by interest in
accessory dwelling units, multigenerational homes, and townhouses. Of the selected preference for
single family homes, about half of the responses (211 of 436) were from residents in Downtown
Edmonds (the "Bowl").
Comments in "other" included thoughts on building style appropriateness for specific neighborhoods,
concerns on environmental impact and tree canopy, ability to accommodate parking, regulation of
vacation rental housing (AirBnB) and concerns that existing road size could not accommodate more
residents or traffic.
Preferences trend toward two themes 1) single family, low -density, low-rise and 2) affordability for
young adults, singles, and people down -sizing.
Location..
Downtown Edmonds (the "Bowl") 211
Esperance(unincorporated county) 16
Firdale 10
Packet Pg. 268
9.B.d
Five Corners
29
Highway 99
9
Lake Ballinger
11
Meadowdale
12
Perrinville
18
Pine Ridge
15
Seaview
43
Sherwood Forest
6
Talbot Park
3
Town of Woodway
2
Maplewood
Not
optioned
Westgate
50
Q: 2 What type of businesses, services, community features and public spaces would you like to see in
your neighborhood? Select all that apply. 104 respondents (mini survey) 478 respondents full survey
Livability
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
1000
n
o e & ty
ee ey �e Na
�yQ `e yc at .fit ��t y`o `eo to yet
Jta r oa et o° a� �e
cJ�� J°J to\� tt`et 0 eeQ' a\\ `°� gat c`ea\ eta° ty\tea tao�L? �0�
a�a ��et, \aea fat Ot to
�o .�
Qt `�c `eyQ \�`o� eao tey� Leta ooa�
O°etc°° Obi` ,00 to �S C'e he oo\\ea
�o
Key themes
The most selected category for businesses, services, community features and public spaces that people
would like to see in their neighborhoods are walking/biking trails followed by more parks, more small
restaurants/bars/coffee shops, and greener streets.
Packet Pg. 269
9.B.d
Q3. What else could improve your neighborhood?
Key themes
1. Walkability including more sidewalks and maintenance/repair of existing sidewalks, lighting,
crosswalks for people using assisted mobility devices, strollers, and for dog walkers.
2. Road maintenance and road safety. Traffic calming measures and safer roadways to reduce
speeding, increase pedestrian and cyclist safety, including noise reduction and traffic alleviation
3. More public space or the improvement of existing public space. Maintaining a healthy tree
canopy, more green space throughout public spaces, spaces for families with young children,
walking trails, parks, and indoor gathering spaces.
4. Keep a local, small-town atmosphere.
Packet Pg. 270
9.B.d
Written responses
Key themes by category:
1) Transportation
a. Public Transportation: People want more public transportation options with easy access and
fewer connections.
b. Automotive: Attitudes diverge regarding parking - some think more public parking should be
provided and others want less. Traffic safety and ferry traffic congestion are concerns.
Walking: People want more and better sidewalks, and an increase in pedestrian connectivity
especially in the Highway 99 Corridor.
Bicycling: People want more and safer bike lanes/routes.
2) Land Use
a. Land Capacity Summary: Opinions diverge between wanting more density, and those who
want to see Edmonds' zoning and land use stay the same, especially in the "Bowl" and
downtown.
b. Housing Summary: A large number of respondents indicated interest in Middle Housing
options (infill in Single Family zones) as housing is becoming increasingly more unaffordable.
Many people expressed that younger people and people with low and middle incomes
cannot afford to live in the City.
3) Community Sustainability
a. Community Health: People expressed appreciation of public engagement and the sense of
community they feel as a part of Edmonds. Most feel like Edmonds is safe but have concerns
about people who are experiencing homelessness (unhoused).
b. Environmental Protection: People want to preserve and increase tree canopy and protect
beaches and marshland.
4) Parks and Recreation and Open Space: People are interested in more amenities for dog owners,
continued investment on the waterfront and beach, and overall resources for marshland, fishing,
boating, parks, and playgrounds. More transportation access to parks was mentioned frequently.
5) Community Culture and Urban Design
a. Arts and Culture: People acknowledged the vibrant arts community and strong downtown
restaurant culture. People expressed a desire for more diversity in the arts, including youth
involvement, indigenous people's involvement, and access to art outside the "Bowl".
b. Urban Design: People love the design of Downtown Edmonds and want to preserve the
"small town feel" that street frontages and low building heights provide.
6) Diversity Summary: Respondents expressed that the City of Edmonds is not celebrating diversity as
much as it could - some demographics are overlooked, especially younger families. Many people
also perceive a lack of representation for residents who live outside the "Bowl" and an overall lack
of connectivity to the cultural diversity of the Hwy 99 corridor.
7) Economic Development: Respondents expressed that there is a lot of focus on restaurants and
places that are already highly invested in, and there is concern about commercial rents being too
high, leading to fear that commercial space may disappear as traditional brick -and -mortar
businesses change.
Packet Pg. 271
9.B.d
Key takeaways
Recurring themes expressed in all six surveys include:
1. Maintain the City of Edmonds' small-town atmosphere
2. Assess building style per neighborhood, include affordable housing for middle income
households
3. Increase diversity and engage people outside of Downtown Edmonds ("the Bowl")
4. Maintain and restore the environment, specifically trees and marshland
5. Increase walkability and access to public transit
Packet Pg. 272
9.B.e
From:
Joan Bloom
To:
Council
Subject:
8.1 Public Hearing on Draft Community Vision Statement for the Comprehensive Plan
Date:
Tuesday, August 1, 2023 4:52:19 PM
Council,
Following are my public comments for agenda item 8.1 Public Hearing on Draft
Community Vision Statement for the Comprehensive Plan
Staff presented draft Community Vision Statement:
"Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets,
and a thriving arts scene. We are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient
future."
My proposed Community Vision Statement:
"Edmonds strives to be a welcoming city that offers our residents opportunities to
improve their quality of life. We value stewardship of our environmental assets,
vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, a thriving arts scene, and streets that are safe for all,
including pedestrians, bicyclists and those with mobility challenges. We are engaged
residents who embrace our open access to the natural resources of Puget Sound
and take pride in shaping our climate resilient future."
Rationale
First sentence:
"Edmonds strives to be a welcoming city that offers our residents opportunities to
improve their quality of life.
Edmonds government does not, and CAN not provide "outstanding quality of life for all."
The statement is both untrue and arrogant. The most any city's government can provide
are opportunities for residents to improve their quality of life, based on their own definition
of "quality of life."
Saying "Edmonds is a welcoming city' is aspirational, not actual. The addition of "strives to
be" turns this into a more realistic, and thus more honest, statement.
Second sentence:
We value stewardship of our environmental assets, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods,
Packet Pg. 273
9.B.e
a thriving arts scene, and streets that are safe for all, including pedestrians, bicyclists
and those with mobility challenges.
The definition of "healthy streets" is vague, at best. Therefore, "healthy" should be
eliminated. "Safe streets" can be easily clarified, as in my sentence above.
Third sentence:
We are engaged residents who embrace our open access to the natural resources of
Puget Sound and take pride in shaping our climate resilient future."
The natural resources of Puget Sound must be included in this Vision Statement, given
its demonstrated importance to our community. "Resilient future" has no discernible
meaning. The meaning of "Our climate resilient future" is clear.
Thank you for your consideration of my input.
Respectfully,
Joan Bloom
Former Edmonds Councilmember
Joan Bloom
Packet Pg. 274
9.B.f
6. RECEIVED FOR FILING
1. PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT - 2023 Q2
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
2. SALARY COMMISSION TERM ASSIGNMENTS
3. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS
7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
Councilmember Buckshnis requested Consent Agenda Item 7, AMD2023-0005 Revised Minor Code
Amendment Package #2, be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed on the agenda as Council
Business Item 9.3.
Council President Pro Tern Olson requested Item 7.6, Approval of Marchis Property Settlement Agreement,
be removed from the Consent Agenda and scheduled on a future agenda.
Councilmember Teitzel requested AMD2023-0005 Revised Minor Code Amendment Package #2 be
Council Business Item 9.1 and renumber the remaining items in consideration of staff who are present for
that item. Council President Pro Tem Olson pointed out there are attorneys present for the other items who 0
are also being compensated. v
N
N
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: N
0
1. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES JULY 18, 2023
2. APPROVAL OF FIN COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES JULY 20, 2023
3. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES JULY 25, 2023 M
4. APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JULY 25, 2023 Vi
5. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENT r�
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT
6. APPROVAL OF MARCHIS PROPERTY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER
BUCKSHNIS, TO MOVE THE MARCHIS PROPERTY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT TO A
FUTURE AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
8. PUBLIC HEARING
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAFT COMMUNITY VISION STATEMENT FOR THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Mayor Pro Tern Tibbott commented this is a very important public hearing because the City is at a historic
point where a comprehensive plan is being developed that addresses many of the issues discussed when the
consultant contract was approved. The public hearing is an opportunity to hear from residents as well as
hear from staff regarding the process and next steps.
Planning & Development Director Susan McLaughlin commented she has been before council previously
regarding this topic. Tonight's public hearing will be a deeper dive discussion about the vision process and
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 2
Packet Pg. 275
9.B.f
next steps as well as an opportunity to hear feedback from the public regarding the visioning process and
the resultant draft community vision statement. She reviewed:
Draft Vision Statement
�1E�auNps wmr WE HEARD
WAFr VISION STATEMENT
aff—�."`->J�'Y�,m.w �uw��
- - �_ I Iwasc wnMaun rm
TI4 A "MIL
arorwPs� WG Hpp NAWAW
WuTNW AF7raRrM[eMYYeNr pK /15161�ONMiP1 ro B16wc rent. TO RWc.T0.1Y1R
prl rMORIeRe �Ft�W uYe1 UQHMlS� REQAK GTNEMES snceuu+aeswwellro ameLe awwe ewwstee r.)
o Created using the results of the 6-week visioning process
o Encapsulates the approach and themes that were heard to formulate the draft community vision
statement
We developed branding - Summer 2022
o Comprehensive Plan Branding - Everyone's Edmonds
■ Inclusive engagement, broad engagement
■ Raise awareness about the plan
■ Branding everyone recognizes and feels approachable
■ Received a lot of positive feedback on the name and the branding
■ Branding translated into multiple languages
■ Created templates for flyers, posters, yard signs and PowerPoint presentations
- Will serve the City well for the next two years
We set an outreach goal - Summer 2022
o To receive 3,500 comments from the community
■ 8,500 comments were collected! (survey, in person, tabling and other events)
We developed an outreach approach
o Survey
■ Provided in Korean, simple Chinese, and Spanish
■ Qualitative (open-ended) and quantitative (multiple-choice) questions
We launched a 6-week vision process
o Talked to a lot of people in multiple formats and venues
o We talked, we listened, we documented
Yard signs
Coffee Chats RAISE AWARENESS
Panel discussion
THEMED NEIGHBORHOOD CONVERSATIONS I IN-DEPTH CONVERSATIONS ON KEY TOPICS
FROM SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS
Weekly articles Walk & Talks
HELP PUT WEEKLY THEMES INTO CONTEXT EXPLORE KEY TOPICS IN REAL WORLD SCENARIOS
Online surveys
Table at local events
ALLOW INDIVIDUAL EXPRESSION
MEETING PEOPLE WHERE THEY ARE
Multi-lingual branding
.. �5.. 'I•�-arpS PROCESS OF BUILDING TRUST low
We asked for feedback in different ways
o For example, take a picture at your home and answer the question, "In 20 years, I envision an
Edmonds that... [fill in the blank]
■ "In 20 years, I envision an Edmonds that ... our kids can afford to live in."
The draft Community Vision
N
N
Ln
N
O
c
�a
M
N
Lq
ti
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 3
Packet Pg. 276
9.B.f
o From the 8,500 comments, staff worked with the consultant team cataloging and identifying
common themes and commonly heard/written words and drafted a community vision statement
that they thought was in complete alignment with that collective feedback.
■ "Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, 3
and a thriving arts scene. We are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient AD
future."
o:
o Some people may have used different words or said something in a different way.
o The intent was to be true to people's direct comments at the meetings/gatherings, one-on-one
conversations or snapshot taken at home. a;
o Confident the draft community vision reflects the community as a whole.
The vision drafting process o
o 8,500 comments were used to create a word cloud y
parking' neW�
areas
�v a
s i d ewa
B :4t —A-0. str ets filesq 4)
L
safe' t
people s
p�ar.ks '-a
P, ,,i, cuQ�une iffno ablY,, YOCIP �m O
V [IV
� t N
. �� ke�densI IN
04
. N
O/ � O
1)ile i
IaO
lackS'y'
li,��
trees N
natural,,,,tree �
o Draft Community Vision Statement N
o Feedback from surveys was drawn from six weekly themes w
■ Identity o
■ Quality of Life
■ Economic Growth
■ Environment =
■ Culture
■ Livability & Land Use c
o Statement was developed based directly on commonly used words — very little editorializing v
to stay true to collective community feedback ,
o Draft vision statement was vetted to make sure the terms used translated positively in other �O
languages 4)
Development of Visioning Statement t
o "Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, and a a
thriving arts scene. We are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient future." 4.;
■ Many commenters described Edmonds as friendly and inviting, placing high value on the E
sense of community and neighborly relations. t
■ Many stated need to be more inclusive and welcoming, recognizing Edmonds is becoming M
more culturally diverse a
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 4
Packet Pg. 277
9.B.f
■ This phrase balances the lived experience of a welcoming city and aspirational goal to
become more inclusive
■ Commonly used words: community (259), diverse/diversity (205), culture (204, friendly
(92, represented (92), welcome (60), quality (40), different (33), multi -cultural (29), respect
(26), inclusive (25), opportunity (15), acceptance (12), acknowledge (8), kindness (7), 3
tolerance (7) °'
o "Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, and a =
thriving arts scene. We are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient future."
■ During six weeks of conversations, clear environmental stewardship is strong in Edmonds
■ Statement addresses the value of open space, tree canopy, water protection and natural r
CO
beauty of Puget Sound c
■ Commonly used words: Trees (408), environment (93), green (76), marsh (39), canopy 2
(39), open space (30), streams (22), habitat (16), stewardship (5), wetlands (5) >
o "Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, and a a
thriving arts scene. We are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient future."
■ Trickier to say in a condensed way. A lot of uniqueness addressed by neighborhood c
including restaurants, local shops, walkability, access to waterfront, historic character,
vibrance of downtown Edmonds, a
■ More needs to be done in other neighborhoods to highlight their uniqueness c
■ Statement reflects vibrancy and diversity - Edmonds is not just downtown, there are unique 0
neighborhood centers with their own identities N
■ Commonly used words: small town (211), walk/walkable/walkability (209), restaurantsLO
(147), art (138), building (135), neighborhood (86), charm (68), shops (68), vibrant (20,
0
historic (18), commercial (16), village (11), entertainment (11)
o "Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, and a r�
thriving arts scene. We are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient future."Nr;
■ Key themes identified were issues with speeding, lack of sidewalks, disconnected bike
infrastructure, need for traffic calming, desire for better pedestrian lighting N
■ "Safe" reflects the desire for better designed transportation in infrastructure for all users N
which speaks to the Complete Streets policy, especially children -
■ "Healthy" covers the desire to green the City's streets via landscaping and also healthy in v,
terms of physical activity active living b design - walking, biking and transit access
P Y Y- g Y g g, g �
■ Commonly used words: street/road (181), safe/safety (163), sidewalk (156), parking (125),
bike/bicycle/cycle (103), traffic (87), walkability (77), green (76), cars (54), transit (45), _
speed (44), pedestrian (40), bike lane (39), kids (35), pollution (31), transportation (27), _
slow (22), health (18), fast (15), lighting (14), crosswalk (13), traffic calming (8), c
stormwater (7), litter (6), fossil fuel (3) �?
o "Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, and a =
a�
thriving arts scene. We are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient future." t
■ Recognizes vibrant arts community
■ Expressed desire for more diversity in the arts in Edmonds, particularly youth, indigenous a
people's involvement and access to art outside the bowl
■ Recognizes the value of Edmonds as a destination for arts, whether performance, culinary
or physical t
■ Commonly used words: restaurants/eateries (156), art/artist (138), music (24), creative (9),
ECA (4), performance (4), art culture (4) Q
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 5
Packet Pg. 278
9.B.f
o "Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, and a
thriving arts scene. We are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient future."
■ Acknowledges there are several threats to urban heritage, both natural and political
■ Speaks to ability to retain what is most important in the face of an uncertain future 3
■ Resilience of build environment most common, recovering from natural disasters, also in AD
relation to economy, recovering from macroeconomic disruptions
■ Self -resilience of Edmonds residents to meet challenges at various life stages =
■ Resilience from a social, environmental and economic perspective
■ Commonly used words: nature/natural (141), affordable/affordability (101), environment
(93), climate (39), sea -level rise (33), expensive (26), sustainable (23), future (22), gas .-
co
(20), historic (18), economy/economics (14), housing options (10), resilient (3), disaster c
(3), crisis (3) 2
Next Steps >
o Tonight kicks off 30+ days of "Ask Us" Campaign to inform scoping of environmental impact
statement (EIS) which is a requirement of the GMA a
m
o Scoping Outreach - Join Us >_
■ August 6 - Edmonds Community Fair c
■ Wednesday Afternoons Popsicles in the Park
- 4-5:30 pm a
- August 9 at Civic Park E
0
- Additional dates/locations to be included on website and distributed via email list and �?
social media
■ Pop -Up Events throughout the City Ln
- Focused on neighborhood commercial centers throughout city o
- Starting August 17 at Five Corners
- Additional dates/locations TBD
■ September 9 - Porchfest N
■ More information to be posted on project website Ln
"Ask Us" Campaign may sound similar to last summer's efforts
o It is different N
- Begins to drill into topics that will be studied in the EIS
- Looks at alternatives to meet growth targets
- How to meet growth targets
- Where to put the density
- If the City has to provide 9,000 housing units - how would you do it? Where should it go?
What are the implications? What should be studied?
- Answers will be documented and will inform EIS scoping of EIS
Near Term Next Steps
1. Launch formal 30-day scoping period
2. Host numerous events and offers a variety of ways to engage
3. Develop growth alternatives to study in EIS
4. Launch Community Champions Advisory Committee
5. Briefings at planning board and city council
Generalized Project Timeline
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 6
Packet Pg. 279
9.B.f
ASK US J
iI
WE O 190
Comprehensive
Plan Draft
Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott opened the public hearing.
Roger Pence, Edmonds, speaking as a former member and former chair of the planning board during the
period when this vision statement was first developed, said he attended and participated in several of the
outreach events that Ms. McLaughlin referenced. He anticipated a major event when the vision statement
was unveiled on November 5 and was taken aback when the music at Porchfest was interrupted to unveil
the 41 words with little substance. He had envisioned something less general and less vague and
characterized it as a value statement, not a vision statement. Values can drive a vision, but they are not a
substitute for a vision. The 41 word statement is too general and there is nothing that would prohibit an
urbanist consultant from Seattle proposing a 7-story tower downtown to accommodate growth and
development. There is nothing in the vision statement that states that is not the citizens' vision for the future.
The other problem with the statement is the absence of ability to refine or develop a vision. It was presented
as one and done with no ability or interest on the part of staff in incorporating additional input and criticism
into revisions because the model that was used would require redoing the entire process. He opined that
was not a good way to do community engagement; it should be a process of continual improvement, an
iterative process where feedback and new ideas are incorporated until a final product is developed, not a
one and done process.
Marji Fields, Edmonds, thanked Ms. McLaughlin for the explanation and analysis which she found very
helpful. She also thanked Ms. McLaughlin's staff for their hard work. The vision statement as presented
may not be perfect, but she thought it was pretty good. Her main concern was the lack of reference to
climate change, but she felt the residents have provided input and the City will fix that problem. A vision
statement can't do everything, it only sets the stage for an action plan. Action plans make the difference
and close attention needs to be paid to them. She recommended saving energy for those specifics rather
than wordsmithing the vision statement.
Mackey Guenther, Edmonds, founder and executive director of a new, emerging organization in
Edmonds, Coalition for an Accessible and Resilient Edmonds (CARE). CARE's mission is to build a more
sustainable, equitable and prosperous Edmonds, doing this from the ground up through grassroots
advocacy, empowering a diverse set of resident voices, particularly resident voices that sometimes don't
make it all the way to council chambers. This summer their email list has grown to over 150 residents and
is growing quickly. Some of these voices have contacted the council expressing their appreciation for the
working draft comprehensive plan vision statement. They know the council welcomes more resident voices
at meetings and they look forward to bringing more to the council. Informed participation is the bedrock of
democracy. To learn more about CARE's work, he invited the council to attend one of their upcoming
citywide presentations. The next one is August 23 from 6 to 7 p.m. at the Edmonds Waterfront Center.
3
AD
_
E
M
CO
_
0
.N
_
M
a
0
a)
a�
Q.
E
0
0
N
N
u7
N
O
_
M
N
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 7
Packet Pg. 280
9.B.f
Joe Scordino, Edmonds, said the vision statement misses the mark. It is biased toward Edmonds looking
like Lynnwood or Mountlake Terrace, not the community that actually exists. It needs to acknowledge
Edmonds is a waterfront town, that the City wants to help in the recovery of Puget Sound and salmon, and
that the City is a ferry town, something few entities in the U.S. can say and something that needs to be
cherished as part of Edmonds. Edmonds has a fabulous marina and fishing opportunities; that is not
acknowledged in the vision statement. Residents want Edmonds to have abundant trees and greenery and
parks where everyone can enjoy the outdoors whether under trees or on beaches. Residents don't want
traffic congestion from excessive housing or transients who trash the beautiful community. Residents want
to preserve Edmonds and an Edmonds kind of day for their grandchildren. That is missing from the draft
vision statement and it needs to be totally revamped.
Jeremy Mitchell, Edmonds, said a lot of work went into the draft vision statement by staff and community
input. Nothing is 100% correct all the time. In his prior work on vision statements, he recalled someone
saying the vision statement needed to be able to fit on a t-shirt; not all the details will fit in one paragraph.
Longer than that, those become subset values that can be expanded on and drive the comprehensive
framework. If council is unsure due to the 51%/49% split on validating the vision statement, the data could
be run through a subcommittee to develop their own draft statements for validation.
Chris Eck, Edmonds, agreed with Ms. Fields, a vision statement is intended to be short, as encompassing d
as possible, but that is difficult to do in something brief. The work will be in the details around the a
comprehensive plan itself and it will be important to continue checking in with the community on the c
detailed plan related to the vision statement. Spending too much time on the vision statement is not a good 0
use of resources or focus when the actual plan will be the most important. N
N
u7
Ron Eber relayed the staff report suggests limiting refinement of the vision statement because it might not
0
reflect all the previous public involvement. He expressed concern that the current draft does not accurately
or adequately addresses or capture that public sentiment. In looking at the raw data, the number one
response to the question, "what do you like about living in Edmonds? was waterfront access; other r�
responses include natural resources. Although this speaks to environmental stewardship, it is more than CN
that. He referred to an email he sent to council and staff that suggested adding to the last sentence of the
vision statement something like residents embrace open access and the natural resources of Puget Sound. N
That is an important aspect of Edmonds; the beach was packed with people during Monday's low tide. N
Access and ability to partake in the natural resources of Puget Sound is extremely important. The last o
sentence should also say Edmonds takes pride in shaping its climate resilient future. He understood staff
sees resiliency as broader, but it will all come under responding to climate change and it needs to be
mentioned somewhere in the vision statement. If the vision statement is supposed to be the foundation to =
guide the comprehensive plan update and the consultant has not yet developed a community engagement E
plan as called for in the contract, this is already being used before it is approved and staff is already putting =
out what they plan to do in the next 3-4 months and there is no community engagement plan. He urged the c
council to roll up its sleeves, not tinker with the vision statement too much as it may take too much time, �?
but there needs to be something that everyone can embrace and feel comfortable with, either a vision
statement or a value statement. He urged the council to review the comments he submitted about getting =
a�
some mention and connection to Puget Sound and the waterfront. E
With no further public comment, Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Nand thanked Ms. McLaughlin, recognizing she and her department have been working
very hard on this project for over a year. The council has gotten very robust feedback from the community,
not 8,500 responses, but a couple dozen people with strong opinions either way about the vision statement
have reached out. One group that commented brought up the phrase, the gem of the Puget Sound. After
receiving emails, she goggled that phrase to see how it was associated with Edmonds. She asked staff to
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 8
Packet Pg. 281
explain the providence and use of that statement in the City's history and how it relates to the visioning
statement. Ms. McLauglin, said the gem of the Puget Sound is not in the current draft vision statement so
she could not speak to the history of that statement.
Councilmember Nand said it has been used in publications related to Edmonds, but wondered it if had any
official providence. Ms. McLauglin said she has also heard it colloquially but was unable to speak to the
heritage use of the phrase. She did not disagree with the phrase and felt it was a great phrase but could not
speak to it.
Councilmember Nand thanked everyone who participate in public outreach and this public hearing. Some
of the criticism the council received was this was a waste of time and resources, but she felt asking the
community to weigh in on the draft vision statement is an important exercise in what we value and how we
see ourselves. She recognized the Alliance for Citizens of Edmonds and Coalition for an Accessible and
Resilient Edmonds for galvanizing their members to reach out to the City and provide feedback.
Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for Ms. McLaughlin and her team's hard work during the a
past year to develop this 41 word statement. The first sentence, Edmonds is a welcoming city, grabs his
attention. If Edmonds is not currently welcoming, that is something the City strives to be. He referred to r_
the phrase, safe and healthy streets, which establishes a framework of taking care of speeding problems and
other issues happening on the streets, but he wondered if streets was the only thing and whether parks, and a
open spaces could be referenced. He suggested staff consider open spaces including streets and parks in c
that sentence to be more inclusive. He asked if all the people who work, play and visit Edmonds were c�
residents or could other people be included. He suggested replacing resident with people to be more N
inclusive. Ms. McLaughlin said limiting it only to residents was not something that came from the feedbackLn
so that possibly could be changed. o
Council President Pro Tem Olson said packet page 217 of the draft vision refers to the desire to green our
streets through landscaping and stormwater infiltration. She was open to the possibility that there might be r�
infrastructure improvements as part of environmental stewardship. There is nothing in the feedback that `N
talked about infiltration. Ms. McLaughlin said safe and healthy streets was under the theme of
transportation. Commonly used words include green; when green is used to describe streets, it means N
landscaping, street trees, green factors within the streets. Stormwater is not explicitly mentioned in the safe N
w
and healthy streets phrase in the vision statement, but the desire to green streets through landscaping and o
stormwater improvements was a theme. (9
Council President Pro Tem Olson said just because it is a planning term, looking up healthy streets leads to
a website that talks about extensive infrastructure changes that go along with that. She did not want that to
be prioritized in the comprehensive plan. It will certainly be a balancing act issue, but she did not want that
to guide the comprehensive plan as a priority. She did not think that was in the input, she looked for it and
did not see it. Ms. McLaughlin said health streets is a broad and encompassing explanation of active streets;
healthy in the physical sense, providing bike and pedestrian opportunities as well as the green aspect of
streets. Green is also in the environmental health of streets; safe and healthy does not come from
stormwater, it was something that came up in the commonly used words.
Council President Pro Tem Olson commented the other repetitive feedback that the council is hearing about
is a vision statement versus a value statement, instead of using this as a vision statement, the council might
choose to use a vision statement like the gem of the Puget Sound with value statements to back it up. Ms.
McLauglin asked Council President Pro Tem Olson for clarification regarding gem of the Puget Sound.
Council President Pro Tem Olson said that could be the vision statement and the values identified through
the outreach process in the draft vision statement would be the more substantive values to back it up, to
answer the question of what do you mean, gem of Puget Sound? More qualitative things than just being a
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 9
Packet Pg. 282
9.B.f
beach city. Ms. McLaughlin said she was dedicated to staying true to the feedback received through the
8,500 comments. There was a lot said about environment and specifically green, marsh, canopy, open space,
streams, habitat, stewardship, wetlands. She agreed with Council President Pro Tem Olson that Gem of the
Puget Sound was a cool phrase and one that she possibly could relate to. However, she was unsure that was
true for the residents on Highway 99. She can only take what was learned via these commonly used words;
Gem of the Puget Sound was not something people said during the outreach.
Council President Pro Tern Olson summarized it was inclusive of all the things in the vision statement,
especially when it is backed up with value statements consisting of the items in the draft vision statement
to explain what it means to be a Gem of the Puget Sound. Work is being done on all the business districts;
for example, the International District has the potential to be a total gem. It does not deviate from the inputs
to categorize them as value statements to back up Gem of the Puget Sound as a vision statement.
Council President Pro Tern Olson disagreed with staff s recommendation in the public hearing that there is
no need to get approval. The inputs from the public hearing and other public processes should inform staff
and staff could bring back the vision statement with whatever tweaks might be appropriate because
somebody saw things in the data that are better represented the way they saw it than was in the original.
That was the purpose of getting further feedback from the community. It could then go through the planning
board who could forward a recommendation to council and council could ultimately approve or tweak the
statement by the end of 2023. Depending on what other approaches are suggested, she may draft a resolution
to that effect.
Mayor Pro Tern Tibbott spoke to the public hearing process. The council will not take action on any part N
of the vision statement tonight. Following a public hearing, the council typically waits to take action andLn
because this is a special meeting, the council is not allowed to take action unless it is on the agenda. The
0
council will not take action tonight but is discussing ideas for moving forward with the visioning process.
c
Mayor Pro Tern Tibbott asked staff to speak to what is unique about a vision statement that is a summary r�
for a comprehensive plan versus a vision statement on a bumper sticker, letterhead, flag, etc. and how the `N
vision statement would be used versus a statement on letterhead. Ms. McLaughlin answered the current
comprehensive plan does not have a vision statement; it is not required by GMA and not something all N
cities do. She thought it would be a good kickoff exercise to gather feedback via a visioning process, to N
begin envisioning what people want for the future of Edmonds and let that shape the scope of work for the o
consultant contract which it ultimately did, followed by a more technical analysis. As many of the
commenters said during the public hearing, the content of the comprehensive plan is what will ultimately
matter and she needs to be mindful of the resources that go into the development of the content in order to =
adopt a comprehensive plan update by the end of 2024. The difference between a draft vision statement for E
the comprehensive plan is it is a starting point. _
Ms. McLaughlin explained she studied the development of a vision statement last year; part of it is the
process, engaging people in the process so they feel ownership and stewardship over the statement and
development of the comprehensive plan. The purpose of this vision statement will be to launch the
comprehensive plan, to be a sounding board as more content on topics is developed. It doesn't mean if a
word is missing it won't be studied, it absolutely will. For example, the waterfront, there is a huge scope of
work for the Waterfront Plan and it is a key part of environmental stewardship. However, the feedback from
the community was much broader than just the waterfront. She agreed the draft vision statement will frame
the content of the comprehensive plan. The same work could be done without it, but without it, the 8,500
comments received through the 6-week process are not honored. If the vision statement is debated word by
word, the purpose may be lost.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 10
Packet Pg. 283
9.B.f
Ms. McLaughlin explained if the city council wanted to a create a vision statement for the City, it could
cover much broader aspects such as fiscal resilience in the budgeting process, police, etc. This vision
statement is part of the comprehensive plan that will take the City through the end of 2024. There will be
many opportunities for council to ensure the process is pointing toward the north star and that everyone is
moving in the same direction. The best place to do that is on individual topics.
Councilmember Buckshnis thanked staff for answering many of her questions, commented Gem of the
Puget Sound is a book by Ray Cloud which is in the current comprehensive plan which she hoped was
being read to be updated rather than rewritten. She commented it sounded as though staff was trying to
create copy and rewrite something that already exists. There are already pretty good sections on
environmental sustainability, land use, etc. She wanted to ensure the intent was to update the comprehensive
plan. Looking at other websites, their comprehensive plans have been updated and have not used visions
statements. She expressed concern a lot of time and money had spent during the last year on visioning and
ensuring it was inclusive, yet when she reads the source data, she did not see anything about healthy streets
and did not see 8,500 140-word responses. She asked if all the source data had been provided, commenting
by her count it was less than 5,000. Ms. McLaughlin advised the raw data is from the surveys. The
handwritten comments at each of the community events have been tallied and they make up the rest of the
8,500. There are 7,900 in the survey tabulation and the remaining approximately 600 are handwritten
comments on a clipboard based on conversations at outreach events.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she hoped this same process would not continue with the comprehensive c
plan update. The council needs to have statistical surveys to have a better understanding. She asked how 0
many surveys were submitted in different languages. Ms. McLaughlin offered to provide that information, N
recalling there were a few. As explained at previous council meetings, all the tools were provided but theLO
City does not have an inclusive relationship with many populations that have previously not been engaged. c
It is about relationship building and the intent is to do a similar, very inclusive process moving forward in
multiple languages and to encourage people to participate.
CN
Councilmember Buckshnis relayed her concern that it is very biased in some areas. For example, one person
wrote walkability, welcoming and affordability and all that was recorded was walkability. She did not
always equate what was said/written to what was recorded as the five areas. Ms. McLaughlin said she would N
need to review the example that was referenced in more detail. Every comment was accounted for; it may N
have been that it was cataloged in a different place that Councilmember Buckshnis did not see. o
Councilmember Buckshnis asked what she meant by cataloged in a different place that she did not see. Ms.
McLaughlin answered there were themes such as livability, quality of life, etc. so it could have been
cataloged in a different place. _
Councilmember Buckshnis said she continues to be concerned that the council, as policy makers, the
planning board, the economic development commission (EDC), the DEI commission and youth
commission are not part of the process. The City has many volunteers that help the council figure out what's
going on, yet this vision statement came to council saying it can't be changed. The vision statement does
not reflect what she read in the source data. She agreed it was a value statement, not a vision statement. She
wanted to start working on updating the comprehensive plan and not continue to belabor the vision
statement. Ms. McLaughlin said she completely agreed with Councilmember Buckshnis. Councilmember
Buckshnis reiterated she did not agree with the vision statement or how it was created using the source data.
Councilmember Teitzel observed staff's recommendation states the draft vision statement will not be
finalized until the comprehensive plan is adopted sometime before December 31, 2024. That indicates it is
still a draft and based on input received in the near future, it could potentially be modified. He asked if that
was a fair statement. Ms. McLaughlin answered recognizing the level of interest and the need to dive into
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 11
Packet Pg. 284
9.B.f
the topics, adoption of the comprehensive plan is ultimately a council action so it wouldn't behoove to call
it a final vision statement at this time.
Councilmember Teitzel referred to the term, north star, commenting he viewed the vision statement as a
north star to the comprehensive plan where the comprehensive plan components build up to this overarching 3
vision statement. He was unsure how to proceed based on a draft statement that may change in a significant AD
way. In terms of the vision statement itself, terminology matters. He has heard many terms in relation to
streets including walkability, safe, complete, green streets, etc., but healthy streets is a new term . He =
referred to WSDOT's Complete Streets in a King County presentation in last week's packet, pointing out E
the definition of Complete Streets talks about walkability, safe bicycle lanes, safe for vehicles, parking, etc.
In the 8,500 comments that were provided, there were numerous comments about a desire for those things M
CO
so he could see the link to complete streets. However, healthy streets is a broader, more vague term. He c
suggested that adjective be changed to relate to complete streets which it appeared the respondents were 2
referencing. >
c
�a
Councilmember Teitzel referred to the public comment that resilient was a broad, ill-defined term in this a
context and suggested adding climate before resilient which he agreed would make it more direct and
understandable. He requested staff consider his suggestions related to the wording. r_
t
L
Councilmember Paine thanked Ms. McLaughlin for talking about the translations being culturally sensitive. a
That is very important in outreach to more diverse communities where English may not be their first c
language. She read from an email the council received related to what the City is striving for in 2044, 0
Edmonds is a welcoming City offering outstanding quality of life for all. This must actually include all no N
matter their background, their income or their housing status. Valuing environmental stewardship, allowingLO
housing to prevent sprawling exurbs and the destruction of wild lands, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods
0
include people of all kinds and that are safe and healthy with more neighbors walking, rolling and playing
and imagine how thriving our art scene would be if we had abundant homes artists could actually afford.
The vision statement is aspirational and touches on a lot of things everyone values whether they were born r�
in Edmonds or moved to Edmonds. These are the values and qualities of Edmonds life. She recognized the CN
vision statement was a working draft until the comprehensive plan is approved at the end of 2024.
ri
N
Councilmember Paine expressed interest in a nudge toward climate adaptation, climate mitigation resiliency N
because that is the existential threat these days. Elements of the environment need to be recognized, for -
example sea level rise is a climate impact. Active transportation such as walking to bus stops, parks, etc.;
ensure that is a good experience for everyone. It does not necessarily need to be a green street, but has a
sidewalk and there aren't speeding vehicles that increase the decibel level and make it uncomfortable and E
oppressive to walk on such as on SR-104 or Highway 99. This comprehensive plan is looking 20 years out _
and needs to address things like this. The comprehensive plan will get updated every 10 years in the future. _
Planning & Development has been asked to add a lot to the comprehensive plan such as an economic c
development element, and appendixes like the climate action plan, PROS Plan, stormwater plan, etc. There 0
is a lot of synchronizing that needs to happen and things that need to be included in the comprehensive plan
and ensure it melds together. _
a�
E
Councilmember Paine said she would be surprised if the draft vision statement changed much. She
recognized and honored the commitment to hearing 8,500 separate voices from the community. That is a
small-d democracy, some people went to all the outreach events and their voices may have carried more
weight, but 8,500 comments is a lot of content and needs to be recognized. She thanked Ms. McLaughlin
for the explanations tonight and looked forward to what comes back to council. E
M
Councilmember Nand commented two councilmembers are fluent in non-English languages that are a
dominant in Edmonds; is she fluent in Spanish and Councilmember Chen is fluent in multiple dialects of
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 12
Packet Pg. 285
9.B.f
Chinese. She asked if it would be possible the next time the draft vision statement is brought to council to
provide the translations in the packet as well. Ms. McLaughlin asked if her question was to have it translated
into those other languages. Councilmember Nand answered the three dominant non-English languages that
are identified. Word choice matters as does dialect. Ms. McLaughlin agreed which is why the consultant
did that. Councilmember Nand asked to see the translation of the vision statement in those languages.
Councilmember Nand suggested having clauses reworked with different options with the same substance
because wordsmithing is what is provoking a lot of emotional responses from certain people who have
commented quite passionately. Noting as a lawyer she wordsmiths for a living, she suggested an article
may be needed between "offering" and "outstanding." Ms. McLaughlin answered she did not think so.
Councilmember Nand suggested an alternative such as we value our natural environment or something like
that versus we value environmental stewardship. In regard to the controversy over healthy streets, she
suggested, a safe and healthy community in general to encompass open spaces, green spaces, shade equity
and the walkability of the streets. With regard to the reference to residents, there are community members
who work in Edmonds but do not live in Edmonds. She suggested, we are engaged community members
who take pride in shaping our resilient future, instead of we are engaged residents. She looked forward to
seeing the Spanish version of the vision statement.
Council President Pro Tern Olson agreed with replacing residents with community members. This is the
City of Edmonds' comprehensive plan and it should be shaped by the City of Edmonds people. Framing
that as community members is slightly more inclusive to include workers, etc. which she did not object to.
N
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if council will be able to select community champions as she suggestedLn
rather than having staff select them, recalling what happened with the PROS Plan. Ms. McLaughlin
0
responded she was not part of the PROS Plan so could not speak to that. She was not prepared to speak to
the community champions process at the moment and offered to speak to that at a later date. Councilmember
Buckshnis relayed her hope that the council was involved with the selection. r�
N
u7
Mayor Pro Tern Tibbott summarized the council was interested in wordsmithing and adaptation could be I-
beneficial and could possibly come back to council. Another possibility is letting this draft vision statement N
go the background and instead focus on values. He suggested the council may want to discuss that at a C`
future meeting; a draft vision statement that was moldable and value statements help backdrop the -
community discussion. If the intent is to move forward with a vision statement, council is interested in what
that implies related to next steps.
Ms. McLaughlin said she preferred not to lose sight of the vision statement as the process progresses; there
was a lot of feedback during the public hearing. To the comments that so much time has been spent on the
vision statement this year, it has not been worked on since November 2022 because staff has been working
on hiring consultants, developing the scope of work, etc. As some time will have passed when the public is
reengaged, it will be valuable to have a bridge between the 6-weeks process, the resultant comments, the
draft vision statement, and values that will start shaping housing distribution, transportation, etc. What
Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott said regarding going from vision to values makes a lot of sense as work begins on
the individual topics. She recommended keep sight of the vision statement and moving forward.
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS
AMD2023-0005 REVISED MINOR CODE AMENDMENT PACKAGE #2
Mayor Pro Tern Tibbott requested councilmembers identify amendments that should be removed followed
by amendments that only needed minor tweaks.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
August 2, 2023
Page 13
Packet Pg. 286
9.B.f
gym. He asked about additional height if solar panels are added to the roof. Mr. Clark answered likely an
additional 12-18 inches, but they would be pretty well screened by the parapet.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. ARPA USE ORDINANCE
This item was removed from the agenda via action taken under Agenda Item 5.
3. CONSOLIDATED APPROACH FOR 2024 COMP PLAN UPDATE AND HIGHWAY 99
SUBAREA PLAN
Planning & Development Director Susan McLaughlin explained this is regarding the contract for the c
comprehensive plan and the environmental analysis on Highway 99. She reviewed: An
• Recap of 2022 visioning efforts
�a
o Intent a
■ Reach populations we don't often hear from in the public process
- Inclusive branding that led to naming of the comprehensive plan, Everyone's Edmonds
- Survey and marketing in multiple languages t
- Meet people where they are a
- Have a neighborhood presence E
- Test new outreach strategies v
- Willingness to make mistakes and learn -not let imperfection e the enemy of good intent
o Goal N
N
■ Solicit 3,500 comments from the community N
■ One comment equals
■ Each response to a survey question
■ Each comment recorded at outreach event
M
■ Over 8,500 comments were collected C"
o Foundations of Visioning Outreach
■ Week 1: Identity N
■ Week 2: Quality of Life N
■ Week 3: Economic Growth 400
-
■ Week 4: Environment
■ Week 5: Culture a:
■ Week 6: Livability and Land Use
o Summer 2022 Visioning Activities
■ Collective Visioning
- Coffee Chats - themed neighborhood conversations
- Weekly Articles - help put weekly themes into context
- Table at local events - meeting people where they are
- Yard signs - raise awareness
- Panel Discussion - in-depth conversations on key topics from subject matter experts
- Walk & Talks - explore key topics in real world scenarios
- Online Surveys - allow individual expression
- Multi-lingual Branding - process of building trust
o Who did we hear from?
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 11
Packet Pg. 287
9.B.f
502
4,088
9%
6%
-3%
503
5,975
13%
11%
-2%
504.02
5,569
12%
6%
-5%
504.03
3,000
6%
3%
-3%
504.04
4,124
9%
6%
-3%
505.01
3,083
7%
20%
14%
505.02
3,963
8%
23%
15%
507
6,375
14%
11%
-2%
508
6,939
15%
7%
-7%
509
3,871
8%
5%
-3%
• Draft Vision Statement
EDtAOND5 WMT W- "L
OUR ® 14VY0.
1T W
O�� •R�wlirr..tY.Et .J.�R6iaW3?� � uw
�.Im sew i Mu`wuR 14���H 'j a
u
M\NgIY TIp ��F9YVS� � ESS gIByING 3f`IlE
fWk iNM ATt105RNEEE RA pr0.7E WfY'1MEI�BIE NObW4
DRAFT V6161 STATEMENT
reJMoawsA.wkuArua.on
uiaPoad.
YE JAUA: Cw gJM 4[XiK bR+MiDOSMV� VIYNNf 4M CN66i d�41160kwOla,
14U f11Y 51�+5, ANOA'WNB16AR3REVENeAiI E'Wr;I�cfau.M) r nca Wk0'gYz NbW MwWM���R N.+i.ltai rn,aw--•
Mead We \
1W 502
Ik 'milk
503
D
>
Seariew
504.04
d
W
Wpew-d
om
A
504.03 w Rk1g.
i
d
505.01
it
E
504.02
N
4.
is
Town d
woodw
E:�.An<e
�'
N
508
C
505.02
nRnw.ad Farea�
507 n 50
.N
----------------------
lake Ball e
>
la(QfgS1Y4 OIJFpSt^I wEaltay� �
OliSllE6 OWMYIX BMMs(rvE WaA)
o Vision statement based on tally/analysis of 8,500 comments, which were synthesized into
succinct statement
o Want to keep integrity of vision statement because it was intentionally crafted by the number
of times a word was expressed in the 8,500 comments
o Recurring themes will help provide transition to the comprehensive plan goal and policy work
• How was the vision statement vetted?
o Online survey open late February to early April 2023
o Sent to all City households via Mayor's Quarterly Newsletter
o Also sent out via project email list and city social media
■ 51 % - "hit the mark"
■ 49% - did not
• Transitioning from vision to comprehensive plan
o The Community Vision Statement frames the upcoming goal and policy discussions in the
Comp Plan
o Is there still a chance to "wordsmith" the vision statement. Sure, but staff is committed to
retaining the integrity of the collective comments we received during initial visioning phase.
o The next phase of community engagement is intended to enrich the vision by discussing
specific topics such as:
■ Compliance with recent housing bills for topics such as middle housing & ADUs
■ Neighborhood business districts/economic development
■ Climate resilience, natural resource protection and waterfront planning
■ Equity, displacement risk and environmental justice
• Summer 2023 Engagement
o Community kick-off in late July with continued efforts to "meet people where they are"
o Ongoing presence at community events such as: the Summer Market, Community Fair and
Reimaging Events
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 12
Packet Pg. 288
9.B.f
o Consultant team will develop Community Engagement Plan with additional outreach events,
strategies and formation of the Community Champions Committee
o Social media, guest speakers, and updating project website
Planning Manager David Levitan reviewed:
• Consultant RFP and Selection Process
o RFP issued in summer 2022 was unsuccessful
o Updated RFP issued in March and closed in late April; included optional task for Highway 99
SEIS
o City received four proposals, which were reviewed in early May
■ Two proposals included optional Highway 99 SEIS task (with different approaches)
■ Top two consultant teams were interviewed in mid -May (one with optional SEIS and one
without)
o Interview panel unanimously selected VIA Architecture Team
o City negotiated scope of work, budget and schedule, including:
■ Highway 99
■ Waterfront issues
■ Environment and natural resources
■ Economic development plan
■ Scale of outreach
• Scope of Work, Budget and Schedule c
o VIA's proposal includes 0
■ Production of the comprehensive plan document, including EIS N
■ Additional focus on Highway 99 subarea, including dedicated community outreach, uS
potential plan/code refinements, and SEPA review c
■ Development of an Economic Development Plan
■ Illustrative waterfront vision
o Heavy focus on inclusive engagement and graphic -rich materials N
o Includes numerous touchpoints with boards/commissions and the public, including: ui
■ Five meetings with planning board and two meetings with city council in advance of public
hearings; staff will provide additional frequent updates N
■ 2-3 meetings in each of the City's neighborhood commercial areas w
■ Public EIS scoping and review meetings —
■ Online engagement strategies
• Why Highway 99 SEIS + Comp Plan EIS?
o VIA team reviewed previous council discussions and community feedback related to Highway c
99 Subarea 5-year update and the council's request for a Highway 99 SEIS
o Recommended the integration of Highway 99 environmental analysis into the Comp Plan EIS, c
so that the City can take a holistic approach to future growth and environmental protection v
o Aligns with staff s feedback to council last fall, and would provide: ,
■ Efficient and coordinated process within the project timeline
■ Allow City to identify potentially significant environmental impacts and necessary
mitigation measures at a citywide scale r
■ The same level of analysis envisioned for the SEIS would still occur
o City council could still choose to amend the subarea plan and/or repeal the planned action a
ordinance.
• Community Champions Steering Committee
o In line with P&D's Equitable Engagement Framework, the City is proposing the use of a
Community Champions Steering Committee to weigh in on key policy issues
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 13
Packet Pg. 289
9.B.f
o Community Champions will include a variety of historically underrepresented groups,
including racial minorities, older residents, non -motorized transportation users/advocates and
environmental organizations.
Next steps
o Finalize the contract with VIA and committee/council review
o Introduce project approach to planning board (July 12)
o Community kick-off (late July)
o Form Community Champions Steering Committee
o Neighborhood meetings and other outreach (Community Fair, Summer Market, Reimagining)
Councilmember Nand expressed appreciation for the hard work staff put into visioning in preparation for
the comprehensive plan update. With regard to the process going forward with the visioning statement, she
was struck by the use of sesquipedalian terms and the strong bias in the terminology used throughout the
materials that would be more likely to engage college graduates or those with advanced degrees, and not
those with less formal education or younger people. Although the City is trying to target historically
misrepresented communities, what she sees at feedback events is people who likely are college graduates
which is not a broad representation of the community. She loved the substance, the ideas and the breadth
of topics covered in the visioning statements, but it may have more impact if some of the multisyllabic
terms were changed to shorter, punchier statements.
Councilmember Nand referred to the chatter about the use of consultants. With the $400,000 budgeted for E
0
this project, she asked if some of the people in the community who are already engaged could be 0
incorporated such as My Edmonds News, the Edmonds Beacon, and the Edmonds Neighbors Facebook N
group. For example, the moderator of My Edmonds Neighbors, Sarah Butler, moderates thousands of Ln
comments every week from Edmonds community members and does not receive any compensation. In her c
position as liaison to the tree board, it seems the people who participate are not imbedded in the community
the way these individuals are who do this basically as a community service with little to no compensation.
She understood from the perspective of journalistic integrity, it is desirable to have My Edmonds News and N
the Edmonds Beacon able to critique government's process, but they also do incredible work with uS
community outreach and town halls. She questioned whether there was a way the consultant could do that r.�
while still allowing those sources to lambast the council if they did not like the council's process. N
Councilmember Nand asked about the compensation model for the community engagement plan and the
public process for recruiting Community Champions. Ms. McLaughlin acknowledged Councilmember
Nand's comments about the language that was used in the visioning statement, noting the words used most
often in the process were reflected. With the census tracks that responded most to the surveys and attended
events, sometimes educated terms do show up in the vision statement. She agreed there was opportunity in
the development of goals and policies to develop value statements and to frame topic areas using layman's
terms.
With regard to the compensation model, Ms. McLaughlin explained for years the City has relied on unpaid
or underpaid organizations in under -represented areas of the City to provide feedback. It would be similar
to the City asking an engineering firm for free feedback, when the City should be compensating them for
their input. The compensation model levels the playing field and pays people for the services the City needs
to provide an inclusive comprehensive planning document. In terms of the actual transactional process, that
is still being worked out. It has been done in other cities in a multitude of ways, gift cards, W-9 forms, etc.
Once the list of organizations and participants is developed, staff will determine the best transactional
approach.
Councilmember Nand asked if the AMI calculations for new density could be considered as part of the
comprehensive plan update. With the scope of the housing bills, this will be a very important comprehensive
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 14
Packet Pg. 290
9.B.f
plan update for the City. In an earlier presentation, the City's lobbyist said 80% AMI from HB 1110 would
be a floor, the City could push it down to 50% AMI and make it much more stringent for developers. There
are also ways the City could get more bang for the buck with MFTE. She asked if those would be within
the scope of the consultant's services. Mr. Levitan answered as it relates to the comprehensive plan and HB
1110 compliance, those are specific income bands, 0-30%, 30-50%, 50-80%, etc. up to over 120% AMI.
When they are implemented via the development code to comply with something like HB 1110, there is
some flexibility, the City does not have to use the same income levels, but the income levels would need to
be justified and rationalized. The comprehensive plan would give that policy guidance; for example, the
City has identified this and wants to go above and beyond what is statutorily required. Code amendments
typically follow the comprehensive plan by approximately six months.
Councilmember Nand referred to weekly articles in local news sources and asked if those could be
sponsored. Ms. McLaughlin answered it would be very ambitious to promise weekly articles over the next
11/2-2 years. It is a great idea to encourage guest views, but that strategy will need to be framed.
Councilmember Buckshnis said the 8,500 comments were limited to 120 characters, similar to a tweet. She a
would like an opportunity to review the comments to see the common themes. She did not think healthy
streets was thought of by anyone until Ms. McLaughlin joined the City. She relayed some citizens informed r_
her they attended all the presentations, but the data states no one showed up at some of the presentations.
The council has not seen the notes that were used to develop the vision statement. The vision statement was a
revealed at Porch Fest, but the council has yet to vet it. The yes/no survey that was sent out angered many c
people; she was trying to calm people down and give them an opportunity to look at the 8,5000 comments c�
and how they were used to create the vision statement. Ms. McLaughlin said she would be happy to send N
council the categorized 8,500 comments. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if they could be posted on theLn
City's website. Ms. McLaughlin answered they were large to put on the web, but a way could be figured c
out. She said the advertising of events last year was transparent and there were people at all the events. All
the comments received are included in the documented 8,500 comments. Staff was very meticulous about
documenting every comment because the goal was to ensure that every voice was heard. Councilmember r�
Buckshnis encouraged staff to provide a link to the comments. `N
Councilmember Buckshnis recommended bifurcating the EIS from the comprehensive plan. In July 2022,
via Ordinance No. 4079, the council asked for a SEIS for the subarea plan. The subarea plan deals with a
portion of Highway 99, not all of it, and she did not want to lump an EIS in with the comprehensive plan.
This is an update to the 2020 comprehensive plan, but it seems like it should be rewritten. Ordinance 4079
addresses units, land use, development thresholds, transportation thresholds, elements of environmental and
degree of impacts, and changed conditions; aspects that need to be addressed for buildings in the subarea
area of Highway 99 which does not include the international or hospital districts. She preferred to separate
the comprehensive plan from the SEIS and have Herrera do the SEIS. The SEIS does not need to flow into
the comprehensive plan and she felt staff was overreaching saying the SEIS needs to be part of the
comprehensive plan when it is a separate thing compliant with Ordinance 4079.
Ms. McLaughlin answered the environmental framework, a SEPA analysis, is very standardized. How
things are analyzed and what things are analyzed is a very tried and true methodology. Because a citywide
environmental analysis is being done through that methodology, it would be redundant to do them at the
same time for overlapping areas. The preference is to leverage that work and spend more money on outreach
and get more community conversations which will lead to more customized outcomes. This approach will
get the best outcome in the most efficient way.
Lindsey Amtmann, environmental planner, Herrera Environmental Consultants, explained during the
RFP and procurement process she was able to review comments made to council on the Highway 99 EIS.
In her opinion, a lot of community and stakeholder concerns have not been addressed through the EIS
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 15
Packet Pg. 291
9.B.f
process, but the calendar keeps moving on and the City now needs to update its comprehensive plan. As a
SEPA practitioner of over 20 years, it makes the most sense to do one EIS. The City will have a
comprehensive plan and an EIS that looks at potential environment impacts of the comprehensive plan. One
possibility is to do a separate EIS for the Highway 99 corridor. She proposed the City complete one EIS for
the whole city. The two main reasons for doing an EIS are, 1) the proposed action or the project is changing
a lot, or 2) if environmental impacts were missed, neither which are the case in this instance. In this case,
the community is not satisfied. If the City is trying to meet its comprehensive plan goals and other city
planning goals that are triggered by what is done in the Highway 99 corridors, some of the actions and
mitigation may take place elsewhere in the City. If the Highway 99 process is siloed, there may be people
in other neighborhoods who aren't paying attention because they don't think they are part of the Highway
99 community. Having a citywide EIS process is the best chance of capturing all the stakeholders and
addressing the concerns of everyone in the community, not just one area.
Councilmember Buckshnis said she is following the ordinance the council approved in 2018 and asked if
Ms. Amtmann had read Ordinance 4079, establishing a planned action for the Highway 99 subarea pursuant
to the SEPA. Ms. Amtmann responded she has, but it has been a while. Councilmember Buckshnis said the a
council asked for the EIS because there are a lot of units coming on line and citizens in the Highway 99
subarea are concerned about their neighborhoods which is the reason a specific ordinance was adopted. She r_
did not have a problem with doing a separate EIS for the entire City, but in July 2022, the council asked to
have an EIS done because citizens want to know about density, land use, pollution, and other issues that a
would be addressed in an EIS rather than wait until the end of 2024 when a citywide EIS is done. She c
reiterated there are units coming on board now and a SEIS needs to be done because citizens want to know 0
the impacts of the units, what will happen to the aquifer, etc. N
N
Ln
Ms. McLaughlin commented the subarea plan relates to housing capacity as well as development activity. c
The development that has occurred is a fraction of the threshold that was anticipated in the subarea plan
EIS for Highway 99 in terms of development capacity. The analysis in the EIS anticipated thousands of
units and the impacts relative to traffic, stormwater, etc. were mitigated. A critical aquifer rechargeCN
r�
ordinance is be developed and will be ready later this month. She summarized the discussion is not about In
impacts that were not analyzed in the subarea plan EIS, the discussion is about things like displacement I -
that weren't originally addressed and that need to be addressed in a citywide EIS. The Highway 99 area N
cannot be isolated because it would be inequitable to analyze displacement only in that one area. It is N
w
important to think about the housing approach citywide, particularly when members of the Highway 99 0
subarea feel they are taking the bulk of the density. That is a real conversation that needs to occur at a
citywide level to balance the density and analyze it relative to the transportation, stormwater, community
facilities, parks, etc.
Mr. Levitan explained whether or not the 3,325 residential units covered by the planned action ordinance
are appropriate or not, it points to the need to analyze it with a citywide comprehensive plan EIS. If there
is concern that too much growth has been dumped into Highway 99 neighborhoods, one of the alternatives
that could be analyzed in a comprehensive plan EIS is a no action alternative that is based on current land
use and zoning plus 1-2 other alternatives, one of which could analyze reducing the number of residential
units assumed in the Highway 99 subarea. He cautioned, those numbers were based on the 2035 growth
targets which were several thousand units less than the updated 2044 growth targets. The 3,325 units
included in the planned action ordinance are a significant chunk of the 2035 growth targets, but not nearly
as large a percentage of the 2044 growth targets. If the number of units in the Highway 99 subarea is
reduced, additional units need to be accommodated throughout the City which would be factored into the
alternatives analysis. A SEIS is typically to address potential additional unavoidable significant impacts. If
the number of units are reduced, there will be less impacts. As far as needing a SEIS to address changes in
land use within the subarea plan, if the numbers are reduced, it does not seem to require an EIS.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 16
Packet Pg. 292
9.B.f
Ms. Amtmann agreed with Mr. Levitan. She relayed her understanding of Councilmember Buckshnis'
comments, that she is concerned with the timing, and the community wants to know about potential impacts
and what is happening in the Highway 99 corridor in advance of the comprehensive plan and issuing the
comprehensive plan EIS. She opined doing two EIS either concurrently or sequentially will take far longer
than doing one EIS that looks at the City as a whole. If there are particular concerns, those may be addressed
during the public outreach process or during scoping or a separate non-SEPA specific outreach process
which is something the consultant team will be looking at for the Highway 99 corridor.
Ms. Amtmann expressed concern with reaching all of the community with two separate EIS. If a Highway
99 EIS is done first, commitments may be made that the City is bound to in the comprehensive plan. Then
during the outreach, people may feel things are being sprung on them because they weren't paying attention
during the Highway 99 process. In terms of prudent expenditure of public dollars, one EIS will give the
City much more bang for the buck than two EIS. There would be the same level of public involvement, the
same outreach, the same community involvement and no one would be left out.
Councilmember Buckshnis commented that would violate Ordinance 4079 so it would need to be changed. a
Ordinance 4079 states there should be a review every five years; there was a review in July 2022 and council
voted to have an EIS done, but that has not happened and now it is being lumped all together. Citizens are r_
concerned that the Highway 99 SEIS is being lumping in with the comprehensive plan. She acknowledged
a citywide EIS could be done, but most of the growth is projected to occur in the Highway 99 subarea. The a
units coming on line have not been analyzed and people think there needs to be mitigation for traffic, land c
use, bulk, etc. This is very expensive for a comprehensive plan update and the concerns she raised with 0
Ordinance 4079 will need to be addressed when Council President Tibbott is back. N
N
Ln
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the Waterfront Issues Study, recalling staff made a presentation to
0
council and were to return with the changes the council requested which has not been done. She did not
want VIA to be working from a vision statement that the council had concerns with, was too detailed, was
written in a comprehensive plan format, and contained incorrect information. She asked if the council wouldCN
r�
see that again before it was provided to VIA as source data. Ms. McLaughlin said there has not been a In
waterfront visioning process nor has anything been written into the comprehensive plan regarding the
waterfront. An issues paper regarding the waterfront was prepared with a baseline analysis of what was cM„
happening per topic. Vic.
Councilmember Buckshnis said that was what she was referring to. Ms. McLaughlin said it was basically
a current status study as a foundation. As a waterfront vision is scoped as part of the comprehensive plan,
policy and land use guidance will be developed for that study area. She was happy to return that study to
council and suggested scheduling it on the extended agenda as long as it was of interest to the entire council.
That will need to be a focused conversation as that consultant contract has concluded. Councilmember
Buckshnis recalled the council made a lot of comments and thought staff would come back to council. A
mitigation report was used to identify the marsh as a $14-16M cost when it had nothing to do with public
comment or input or even council approval so parts of the report were inaccurate.
Councilmember Paine thanked staff for having the Herrera staff person available, noting Herrera has a very
fine reputation. She referred to the RFP (packet page 152) which states, At a minimum, the plan should
include the following existing elements. She suggested amplifying the environmental concerns such as
sensitive areas, major water bodies, watersheds with greater stormwater impacts, etc. in the scope of work.
She liked the outreach that was done with Everybody's Edmonds and Porch Fest. She pointed out that input
was not statistically valid and the body of confirmation is big. She felt a statistically valid survey would
add value but did not know where it would be best to insert it. She expressed interest in refining the policy
direction so there is community knowledge of the policy elements in the comprehensive plan and then have
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 17
Packet Pg. 293
9.B.f
a statistically valid survey to ensure there is a doublecheck. There is some unevenness based on the regions,
but that may not be statistically abnormal.
With regard to an EIS and SEPA, Councilmember Paine loved the idea of having it done for the entire City,
particularly due to the legislative changes with regard to housing which will be a moving target. She
expected there would be some refinement required due to impacts of the housing bills. She asked how often
SEPA rules and WACs change. She knew there were some changes in the Highway 99 subarea plan from
the first EIS and the request last year for a supplemental EIS, specifically regarding displacement. She
asked if there were any anticipated legislative changes that would mess with the City's universe. Ms.
Amtmann said she was not involved in the creation of the EIS and was not familiar with the changes
Councilmember Paine was referring to. She did not know of any planned changes that would be relevant.
The SEPA WAC changes constantly, she receives emails about minor changes every few weeks. Her
approach would be to move forward with SEPA as written and do a little digging to find out if anything is
anticipated, but she has not heard of anything.
Councilmember Paine asked about changes related to the approval of HB 1181. Mr. Levitan said that is a
related to Growth Management, not SEPA. That bill requires cites to have a climate change element;
Edmonds already meets the requirements of HB 1181 as climate change, adaptation and mitigation are c
addressed in the community sustainability element. It will be updated to incorporate the updated climate
action plan. The community sustainability element was updated in 2020, the rest of the plan was updated a
with the 2015 periodic review. Some of the concerns voiced by Ms. Fields during Audience Comments are c
that environmental protection and environmental quality is not specifically called out in the scope or listed 0
as an existing element. That is because environmental quality and community and public health, natural N
resources, critical areas, etc. are covered in the community sustainability element. It will be important toLn
point that out to the community during outreach and messaging. If the council prefers to split that out into c
an environmental quality element, that is not a great deal of additional work.
c
Councilmember Paine commented the council has had input from the community and people are actually r�
reading the comprehensive plan. She appreciated having a broader citywide approach and asked about the `N
timeline for the EIS in the comprehensive plan update. Ms. McLaughlin said as the analysis begins, there
may be things that can be pulled out and action taken on them sooner. Staff has the ability to tweak the N
subarea plan, however, it would be better to take a more holistic approach and understand co -dependencies N
before taking action. 4-
Council President Pro Tern Olson referred to room rentals as a reimbursable expense in the scope of services
and suggested since the City owns so many buildings, the consultant should be encouraged to use City -
owned buildings for outreach and engagement and get approval from staff or council to use a non -City
owned building for outreach. Ms. McLaughlin commented there are a lot of City -owned facilities in the
bowl, but there are not a lot on Highway 99 or in areas where the City typically does not have a big presence
and is trying to provide equitable, inclusive outreach. She noted the City pays for use of the Waterfront
Center. She suggested adding language to be sensitive to that issue but did not want to preclude paying for
room rentals. Council President Pro Tern Olson said there are some buildings available such as the Public
Works building on 72nd. Ms. McLaughlin observed the conference room is very small. Council President
Pro Tern Olson pointed out the cafeteria is huge.
Council President Pro Tern Olson pointed out reference to Everyone's Edmonds on page 4 of VIA proposal
is written incorrectly. With regard to an online survey, she asked the consultant's level of expertise in
developing questionnaires and suggested having statistically a survey. With regard to the waterfront issues
study, she recalled not agreeing with at least one of the recommendations in the study. It is worth bringing
back to council which she will discuss with the council president. Regarding the community champions
steering committee, she agreed it would be good to have representatives from the environmental community
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 18
Packet Pg. 294
9.B.f
including the Lake Ballinger Forum, the marsh stream team, etc. to ensure citywide, comprehensive input
about the environment. She also suggested listing co -housing as a housing type to look at in comprehensive
plan.
Council President Pro Tern Olson gave A+ to Ms. McLaughlin, Mr. Levitan, and Mayor Nelson on the
process. The council has been asking for collaboration and to be brought into the process earlier and that
was accomplished on this agenda item. She quoted from the narrative, "Council is requested to review and
provide feedback on the approach and scope of work (Attachment 2) from VIA Architecture, including its
recommendation..." commenting these are the type of conversations council has been asking for and hoping
to have. She hoped the input council provided helped the process move forward in a way that everyone who
is interested in what happens in the City wants.
With regard to the draft vision statement, Council President Pro Tem Olson said she had a really big issue �,
and there was no nice way to say it seems ridiculous to say you want to maintain the integrity of the draft >
statement when there was a 51 %/49% endorsement from community which represents what happens when M
there isn't collaboration. When the draft vision statement was brought to council as a draft, council wanted a
to define a healthy street and asked questions about the draft statement. When the community is presented
with an alleged draft and asked if the City got it right, that was a missed opportunity to get more feedback r_
and how it could be improved. If one of the words staff heard over and over was healthy, but not necessarily
in the context of a healthy street, and there is a planning definition where healthy street means something a
very specific, no one who was asked a yes or no question about a health street has any clue about that. The c
City is where it is and this is the draft vision statement that is now final, but she had a big problem with a 0
51%/49% endorsement from the community. She hoped the City was going into the comprehensive plan N
update looking to get a vision statement that is actually validated by the community.Ln
N
O
Ms. McLaughlin answered first and foremost, the objective of the visioning process over six weeks was to
really hear from as many people as possible and document those conversations, to get the branding and the
name and get people excited about this 20-year growth strategy. The City was at a disadvantage because r�
the process had to pause because the RFP only resulted in one proposal that the City did not pursue and CN
there were staffing changes at the senior planner level that manages this project. The reality is that the draft
vision statement is a draft until the end. The City needs to start getting into the themes, cutting the data to N
talk about middle housing, what people in the Lake Ballinger neighborhood want, etc. There are 8,500 N
comments that can be built on. She respected the comments, noting first and foremost the goal was to raise -
awareness and get people's feedback. She honored the transparency of the 51%/49% buy -in, noting those
were conversations that can be built on. She hoped to move forward talking about more substantive
comments and cross check them with the vision statement. She concluded there is a lot of work to do on
the substantive topics.
Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for a citywide SEPA approach. He was not saying that
Highway 99 was not important, but it is part of the citywide SEPA assessment. In particular, Highway 99
is not the only area of the City that can absorb density; density needs to be spread citywide due to the lack
of infrastructure and green space, crime, and environmental impacts. He hoped the SEPA assessment will
help document that Highway 99 is not the only area of the City that can absorb density. He applauded the
outreach efforts in 2022, and recognizing that the effort to reach the non-English speaking population was
not very successful, he asked what staff planned to do differently to have a better outcome. Ms. McLaughlin
answered there was a fairly slim budget for branding, multilingual translation, the general approach,
categorizing, and developing a vision statement. There is now an on -call contract for translation and
interpretation which will make a big difference. Stepherson & Associates, who will assist via this consultant
contract, is well versed in connecting with people who are not typically part of the process. The community
champions will also assist with connecting people through their organizations.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 19
Packet Pg. 295
9.B.f
Councilmember Nand was glad to hear from the consultant who proposed consolidated the EIS into a
citywide plan. When looking at this contextually, the community there is just now finding out based on
community activists' comments that they were upzoned in 2017 to CG which staff previously described as
the most generous building heights in Edmonds. She found it schizophrenic to have the planning department
seeking a finding of blight for the entire corridor because it was so incredibly messed up by previous
planning decisions, but then not want a separate EIS or process when the community was facing radical
land use changes they did not feel they were apprised of years ago. Ms. McLaughlin clarified, it was not
upzoned to CG, it has always been CG. Some of the areas on the periphery were upzoned to CG, but the
vast majority of the area was already zoned CG.
Councilmember Nand said she was referring specifically to the controversy of the previously single family y
neighborhoods that were upzoned to CG due to their proximity to the corridor. Many community activists c
fought for the SEIS last year because they thought it was an opportunity to put the brakes on very radical 2
land use changes they are seeing in real time and she did not want that work overturned by the council and >
the planning divisions. She clarified her comments were not a criticism of Ms. McLaughlin or Mr. Levitan,
but a general feeling having grown up along the Highway 99 corridor and the City moving in a certain a
direction without much input or feedback from the people who live in the affected area. If the SEIS for the
Highway 99 subarea is to be consolidate into a citywide EIS, there should be a public hearing to invite c
community activists to provide feedback. She is often uncomfortable with the tenor of the conversation on
the dais, seven councilmembers deciding for the people who live there whether they will have 7-story a
buildings with or without setbacks, shadowing, massing, lack of parking, traffic impacts, lack of sidewalks, c
etc. She wanted to ensure there was as much community process as possible related to these important 0
changes in that part of the community. N
N
LO
Ms. McLaughlin answered this is a very complex topic. The subarea EIS analyzed the zoning capacity and c
the level of impacts were mitigated against in the EIS. The frustration is not the methodology but the
existing lack of infrastructure. Doing another EIS will not miraculously create capital dollars to mitigate
against the lack of sidewalks or create a threshold for private development to build sidewalks. It is aCN
r�
complex planning framework issue that is difficult to explain to people outside the process. That being said,
she hoped the council trusts staff and the consultant after hearing the feedback and understanding the
subarea plan and understanding the issues the community cares about such as displacement, sidewalks, N
intersection safety, stormwater, etc. that they recognize those issues and are trying to create the tools to N
actually create the change they want to see. She assured the Highway 99 community will be engaged again -
and again in this planning framework. At any point, if the process needs to divert or another action needs
to be taken, there should be the liberty to do so if it will better serve the community. What the council is
hearing the consultant and staff say is they are using the most expeditious and holistic approach which is in =
keeping with the community's needs.
Mr. Levitan added, as someone with a strong background in SEPA who watched the process as a resident
last fall before he was employed by the City, he did not want it to seem like staff or the city council was
downplaying concerns voiced by the community. Analyzing whether development potential as far as the
zone capacity and heights that were implemented as part of the development code need to be changed to
have they have less impact on community is absolutely something that will be done. That is better structured
as part of the comprehensive plan EIS as one of the two main alternatives, an alternative that reduces
building heights and zone capacity within that area. A full comprehensive plan EIS has not been done since
the 1995, largely because the City hasn't had to increase its zone capacity to meet its growth targets. The
City now has a massive increase in the zone capacity it needs to accommodate and will need to change land
use or zoning designations to meet those growth targets.
Councilmember Buckshnis observed there were four responses to the RFP and asked how VIA was
selected. She noted from their website, VIA is a really good urban planner, but pretty weak in the area of
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 20
Packet Pg. 296
9.B.f
environmental. Mr. Levitan answered the entire team was evaluated including Herrera assisting on the
environmental side and with policy. Because Edmonds' RFP was out a little later, some of the traditional
firms that do comprehensive plan updates had already exceed their capacity. Staff was happy to get four
responses; other cities did multiple RFPs before receiving proposals. Consultants rely on subs for areas of
expertise they do not have; looking at the team holistically with the primarily consultant on economic
development, land use and urban design, and Herrera on the environmental side, they will be able to more
than adequately address issues that need to be analyzed as part of the comprehensive plan update.
Councilmember Buckshnis referred to Taks 3.1, pointing out there was a lot of background documentation
and materials that council has never seen such as the five corners alternatives analysis and fact sheet,
highway 99 Lake Ballinger sub area plan and PAO. She noted when looking at the website, it appears
council has already approved the draft vision statement, the background, why the comprehensive plan is
being updated, the waterfront issues report, and a gap analysis, but none of the other documentation and
materials such as the 8,500 comments. Citizens are interested in the information that was used to create the
vision statement. She suggested updating the webpage to include all the documentation and materials listed.
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the Five Corners alternatives analysis and fact sheet was the Five
Corners plan done by the University of Washington 6-7 years ago. Mr. Levitan answered yes. Not all the
documentation has been adopted by council, some are background reports or conceptual plans that did not
require council adoption. The list of background documentation and materials was to provide the consultant
a general understanding of the scope and scale of work that has been completed in the past. Staff can provide
specific items if the council wants them.
N
Councilmember Buckshnis asked if VIA is headquartered in Portland. Mr. Levitan answered they are based Ln
in Seattle. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the contract includes travel, per diem and airfare. Mr.
0
Levitan advised the project manager is in Seattle, the project principal is in the Bay Area, Herrera is local,
and Stepherson is based in Seattle. Councilmember Buckshnis was concerned with providing this
information some of which may be inaccurate such as the waterfront issues study. She noted for the PROSCN
r�
Plan, the community champions were selected instead of asking for volunteers. She wanted to understand In
the process, noting $650,000 for a comprehensive plan is quite a bit of money. She recognized some of the I -
cost was Herrera and doing a citywide SEPA. N
Council President Pro Tern Olson commented most councilmembers have been involved in issues related
to the CG zone and have contacts in the area including people who wanted the SEIS and made the case for
doing that. She anticipated the council would get feedback from those residents in the coming weeks and
she hoped they would see it like she does, that a holistic approach tends to lead to better results. Ms.
McLaughlin offered to make an extra effort to notify of next week's planning board meeting.
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NAND, TO
EXTEND TO 10:15. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Nand said the Highway 99 SEIS is such a matter of interest for community activists and
the community in that area, it warrants a public hearing before making these changes. There was a budget
allocation and an ordinance related to the SEIS; this is a change to what was proposed to the community as
a solution to their problems. The community may be fine with consolidating the Highway 99 subarea SEIS
into a citywide EIS, but that is not a decision the council should make with a very skeletal audience at
almost 10 p.m. She wanted to ensure there was a robust public process due to changes happening in the
corridor. She will talk with Council President Tibbott about scheduling a public hearing.
4. LETTER TO WSDOT REGARDING UNOCAL PROPERTY
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
July 5, 2023
Page 21
Packet Pg. 297
9.B.f
Councilmember Teitzel referred to a $500,000 expenditure to purchase property at 7317 Lake Ballinger
Boulevard which is uninhabitable and flooded. He asked how that property would be used, whether it
could be a pocket park. Mr. English answered there are restrictions with DOE stormwater grants. It
cannot become a park, but other stormwater attributes could be added to the site to improve the water
quality of runoff from the property before it goes into the lake such as a rain garden. It is still too early to
have a firm answer on that, that is something that will be considered further down the road on that project.
m
Councilmember Tibbott asked whether DP#31, the project manager, would reduce consulting or project
manager fees. Mr. English answered probably not now because the workload is increasing. Adding that
position adds capacity to handle the workload, but there will still be consultant contracts. The project E
manager is the owner interface/manager to facilitate that work, but resources for design and inspection
will still be needed. If there is an economic downturn and grant or project revenues decline, that person y
could be moved into a design role which would save on consultant costs. c
.N
Councilmember Tibbott requested the council be provided the updated PowerPoint presentation. With
regard to the decision package related to vehicle purchases, he asked staff to provide the mileage of the
a
vehicles proposed to be replaced. He asked if vehicles would be replaced with hybrid or electric vehicles >
whenever possible. Mr. Antillon answered yes, although for the F-450s, there is nothing commercially
available. Each vehicle has a different standard related to the life and mileage expectations, but at the end 4)
of the day, it is the mechanics' discretion. For example, some vehicles can have high mileage, but are in L
good condition and those would be retained. Councilmember Tibbott observed the vehicles proposed to
be replaced are ones that really need to be replaced. v
Observing it was now 9:57 p.m. and the council had at least 1 %2 hours of discussion on the remaining two N
agenda items, Mayor Nelson asked how the council would like to proceed. Council President Olson N
relayed the planning board uses council chambers tomorrow night, so the council will need to decide c
whether to add another hour to tonight's meeting or some councilmembers are available tomorrow from -0
4-5 p.m.; she is not as she will on a flight during that time.
M
N
COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO `n
EXTEND THE MEETING TO 11 P.M. MOTION CARRIED (6-1), COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT M
VOTING NO. N
Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess.
2. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VISIONING SUMMARY
Development Services Director Susan McLaughlin relayed this item is to talk about the comprehensive
plan and in particular the visioning process that was conducted during six week this summer. She will not
reveal the vision statement tonight because work is still being done on it including reviewing the
summary provided in the packet and taking into consideration all the comments received including from
some councilmembers who completed the survey this past week. She introduced Senior Planner Brad
Shipley, the lead for the community outreach and deputy project manager on the comprehensive plan. She
reviewed:
Approach
o Intent
■ Reach populations we don't often hear from in the public process
■ Strategy
■ Inclusive branding
■ Survey and marketing in multiple languages
■ Meet people where they are
■ Have a neighborhood presence
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 25, 2022
Page 30
Packet Pg. 298
9.B.f
101
■ Test new outreach strategies
■ Willingness to make mistakes and learn - not let imperfection be the enemy of good
intent
Goal
■ Solicit 3,500 comments from the community
■ One comment equals:
- Each response to a survey question
- Each comment recorded at outreach event
■ Over 8,500 comments were collected via:
Yard signs
Coffee Chats RAISE AWARENESS
Panel discussion
THEMED NEIGHBORHOOD CONVERSATIONS INZEPTH CONVERSATIONS ON KEY TOPICS
/ FROM SU&ECT MATTER EXPERTS
Weekly articles
HELP PUT WEEKLY THEMES INTO CONTEXT
Table at local events
MEETING PEOPLE MERE THEY ARE
Walk & Talks
EXPLORE KEY TOPICS IN REAL WORLD SCENARIOS
aline surveys
ALLOW INDIVIDUAL EXPRESSION
Multi-lingual branding ISM ,;DI`
PROCESS OF BUILDING TRUST
o Survey
■ Provided in Korean, simple Chinese and Spanish
■ Two to four questions each
■ Qualitative (open-ended) and quantitative (multiple-choice) questions
- Qualitative comments limited to 140 characters to encourage succinct responses
- Intent was to allow individual expression while reducing chance for misinterpretation
and to process in a timely manner
■ Option to take full survey provided
o Events
■ Comments cataloged the same as survey
■ Comment logs created for each event
■ Tracked the number of people engage and what we heard
What we heard - survey results, community conversations
o Percent of Total Survey Responses, by Neighborhood
■ Downtown 37%
■ Westgate 10%
■ Other* 10%
■ Seaview 8%
■ Five Corners 7%
■ Pine Ridge 4%
■ Perrinville 4%
■ Highway 99 3%
■ Esperance 3%
■ Lake Ballinger 3%
■ Firdale 3%
■ Meadowdale 2%
■ Sherwood Forest 2%
■ Talbot Park 1%
■ I do not live in Edmonds 1 %
■ Town of Woodway 0.3%
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 25, 2022
Page 31
Packet Pg. 299
9.B.f
*common "other responses: Maplewood, Emerald Hills, Uptown, Yost Park, specific
intersections
o Residency in years, number of responses
■ Less than 1 22
■ 1-2 45
■ 3-5 86
■ 6-10 106
■ 11-15 79
■ 16-25 95
■ 26-35 85
■ 36-50 57
■ More than 50 28
■ I do not live in Edmonds 16
• Survey Responses
o What do you love about Edmonds?
■ Small-town feel
■ Access to waterfront and nature
■ Walkability
■ Locally owned businesses
■ Thriving arts and culture scene
■ Sentiment was universal - not particular to a specific neighborhood
o How would you like to see your values reflected in Edmonds?
■ Environmental stewardship
- Protect natural areas
■ Commitment to being inclusive and celebrating our diversity
■ Improve infrastructure for walking and biking
■ Disparate comments regarding growth
- Oppose high density
- Recognition of need for more housing options
o What do you like about living in Edmonds:
■ Waterfront access
■ Cost of housing
■ Cost of living
■ Medical care and services for Seniors
■ Convenient commute
■ School district
■ Access to multicultural resources
■ Other - arts and culture, proximity to natural resources, parks and trails, walkability,
cleanliness, community events, infrastructure and community services
■ Public transportation and walkability
■ Attractions & Entertainment
■ Restaurants and shopping
■ Small town feel
o Is there anything you don't like about Edmonds
■ Being too car centric
- Lack of sidewalks
- Need for better public transportation
- Speeding driver
- Imbalance of parking
■ Government
- Inequitable distribution of fund
- Lack of transparency and accountability
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 25, 2022
Page 32
Packet Pg. 300
9.B.f
- Concern only the loudest voices are heard
■ Mixed response to land capacity
- Increased density is not desired by some
- Others say there is not enough housing
o What kind of businesses (good and service) do you travel outside the city for?
■ Larger retailers in Lynnwood and U-District
- Mentions of Alderwood Mall, Central Market, Costco, Fred Meyer
■ Sentiment that big -box and large retailers are not needed in Edmonds —it's ok to travel to
some things
o Do you work in Edmonds
■ 72% no
■ 28% yes
o If you do not work in Edmonds, what kind of work do you leave the city for?
■ Retired 35%
■ Education, training, library 8%
■ Healthcare 8%
■ Tech 8%
o What are you most concerned about when it comes to environmental future of Edmonds?
■ Water protection
- Sea -level rise
- Protection of streams
- Pollution
■ Green Space
- Retaining or replacing tree canopy N
- Notable mention of "right tree, right place" for preservation of views N
■ Land capacity c
- Density is harmful, citing associated tree canopy loss and increased traffic
- Others say density is a solution, citing walkable communities and sustainable
buildings as an outcome CN
o What do you feel like your ethnicity and culture are represented in Edmonds? What
ethnicity(s) and culture(s) would you like to see better represented in Edmonds? C6
■ Commonly skipped question `N
N
■ Large majority who answered self -identified as "white" and said "yes" 00
■ For "needs more" responses, most common answers are "all non -white cultures" and o
Indigenous/Native American r
■ Many found the question divisive =
o What can the City do to better celebrate diverse cultures? E
■ Partner with ethnic and cultural minority communities
- Honor holidays that aren't white dominate culture
- Honor cultural presence through events and public art
■ Increase representations in hiring and elected and appointed positions
■ Install streetscape design that acknowledges culture, heritage and language
o How else could improve your neighborhood? E
■ Walkability t
- Maintain/repair existing sidewalks, lighting, crosswalks for people with mobility
issues
Road maintenance and safety
- Traffic calming
- Improve cyclists' safety
More public space
- Green space
- Space for families with young children
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 25, 2022
Page 33
Packet Pg. 301
9.B.f
■ Keep small-town atmosphere
Next Steps
o Continue to analyze results
o Draft vision statement
o Reveal vision statement (Portchfest Nov. 5')
o Validate through survey and community champions advisory committee
o Briefings at planning board and city council
Project timeline
2022 2023 2024
Visionlny Step - Scenano Dovalopmant . Con<urroncy Drak plan Documantc F�na. Plan Oocumems Adoption
Imud can Euaoo->n eaard. E'a k6 Cwn 17 Fk.1 Han
Tere Me<nnea aCsmnlaaiarr Caanp—Ad—,
6drlao�yGwO Gaup
Continuous public engagement!
With regard to the responsiveness to the surveys, given Edmonds' large senior citizen, Councilmember
Nand suggested doing what the mayor's office did, providing physical mailers, which might result in c
more responses. For example, she is almost 40 and does not usually use QR codes and it may not be
somethingthat registers with seniors. Regarding the survey response about celebrating other holidays, she °'
g g g Y p g Y� a
was a board member of Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, a 3-person staff organization that does c
incredible things in the community and there is a large misconception that the City puts on celebrations 0
like 4' of July, tree lighting ceremony and Halloween, the traditional, Americana type holidays. For N
example, she is Hindu, and Diwali was yesterday which raises the question of why the City doesn't do a
Ln
Diwali lighting ceremony or for people of the Jewish faith, why the City doesn't light a menorah. The
0
Chamber of Commerce board gets annoyed when the City uses photographs of their events, furthering the
perception that the City, not the Chamber, organizes and funds those events. From a legal standpoint, if
the City were to start doing Diwali lighting ceremonies or lighting a menorah, it becomes a matter of first
amendment freedom of religion, access has to be provided to everyone and certain religions, such as the CN
Church of Satan which is very politically active, may demand to have an event. She suggested talking to
the diversity commission and the city attorney about to incorporate a more culturally diverse holiday CC6
calendar. N
Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for the outreach effort and the great results. With regard to
celebrating holidays, he complimented Mayor Nelson for starting the new year with a Chinese New Year
celebration. He pointed out the survey process did not include mention of public safety, which is the
number one priority for the City and for him as a councilmember. For the City to have peaceful life, and
enjoyment, public safety needs to be included. Ms. McLaughlin explained this was a high level sentiment
survey that corresponded with the exact chapters of the comprehensive plan. Survey comments addressed
public safety, particularly the perceived recent increase in crime. Councilmember Chen suggested future
surveys include a specific question about public safety.
Council President Olson said she provided some written comments to staff, but would not recap them in
the interest of time. With regard to the ethnicity and culture question that staff assessed as something
people were uncomfortable with, it could be that people didn't answer because there were two ways of
interpreting the question. For example, she interpreted it differently than staff, she interpreted it as what
someone wanted to see represented in celebrations. If the question was interpreted the way staff did,
people may not have felt that was a role for government.
Council President Olson said she was glad to see views expressed with regard to right tree right place as
that is a very strong interest and value in Edmonds. With regard to environmental stewardship, she
pointed out the City and electeds can do environmental stewardship, but there is also a great volunteer
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 25, 2022
Page 34
Packet Pg. 302
9.B.f
culture in Edmonds, something that should be fostered and encouraged to make the City almost like a co-
op. Clean and safe streets, and public safety is definitely a value in Edmonds. She thanked staff for the
packet, commenting the outreach was excellent; staff can't make people participate, but they definitely
did everything in their power.
Ms. McLaughlin acknowledged that question could be misinterpreted because it included the word
AD
celebrate which could be taken in a variety of ways. The key themes were interest in more opportunities
for an equitable, inclusive, welcoming and culturally diverse City. That comes through in the values and
there is work to do; this is the beginning of the journey.
E
Councilmember Teitzel thanked staff for their work, recognizing it is a huge lift getting all these survey
responses and being everywhere to get input. He referred to the comparison of respondents by y
neighborhood, which indicated there were 32 respondents from Highway 99. He was a little 0
uncomfortable with drawing conclusions about the needs and wants of a community on such a small T
number of respondents. He asked what percentage that number represented of the total households in the
Highway 99 area. Ms. McLaughlin said she did not have that exact number. While Highway 99 is
a
described as a neighborhood and that was one of the options, those lines are ambiguous and can include
adjacent areas such as Lake Ballinger and Esperance. She agreed the number of respondents from that N
neighborhood were not great. Many different ways of outreach were utilized and will continue to be 4)
utilized. The community champions advisory committee will be an opportunity for long term engagement L
in a meaningful way
E
0
Ms. McLaughlin continued, as Councilmember Chen has mentioned in the past, people who are v
underrepresented often work 2-3 jobs and may have trust challenges with public government. She N
clarified she was acknowledging that, not using it an excuse, but the survey responses are a baseline to N
shape the next phase of engagement. This, coupled with the equitable engagement framework will c
provide the tools to do a better job. She summarized there is a long history in Edmonds that cannot be 0
fixed overnight. Councilmember Teitzel recognized it was challenging and assured his
comments/questions were not intended to be critical. CN
Sri
Councilmember Teitzel asked what percentage of the 32 respondents represent the various ethnic C6
breakdowns in that area. Ms. McLaughlin said this stage, the sentiment survey, intentionally did not ask `N
N
for race, cultural, social economic, etc. information to avoid burdening survey respondents with providing 00
a lot of personal information. That will be important in future surveys regarding specific topics. o
m
r
Councilmember Paine agreed this was the beginning. She suggested finding opportunities for the best =
environmental design using crime prevention through environmental design (SPTED) and partnering with
Chief Bennett. She looked forward to future conversations regarding the comprehensive plan update.
3. EDMONDS DOWNTOWN ALLIANCE 2023 WORK PLAN AND BUDGET
Community Services & Economic Development Director Todd Tatum began with what is a BID. They
first stated in Canada in the early 1970s and were immediately implemented across the border in the
United States. Since then, countries around the world have used the U.S. model to implement their own
business improvement districts/areas. These organizations focus heavily on urban renewal and
competitiveness in the rise of suburbanism which saw the demise of so many historic downtowns. Malls
and shopping areas in suburban America were able to market coherently, cost-effectively and collective
which put places like Edmonds in a challenging competitive landscape, a dynamic that continues today.
Mr. Tatum continued, BIDS at their heart are public private partnerships. They leverage the strength of the
government and couple it with the strengths of a talented business community. They allow cities to act
entrepreneurially and lend to managerial energy in solving problems like were seen during the pandemic.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
October 25, 2022
Page 35
Packet Pg. 303
Vision
plan
Comprehensive Plan
Vision Process & Next
Susan McLaughlin AICP, LEED AP, Planning & Development Director
August 2nd, 2023
Steps
9.B.g
9.B.g
WMr WE NEARO
low
~ Q04TflfUFE
M6>tiF•
At
WA1s2FaAuT L k 6014
WHAr DD ` MIA w Wm s VI I
I l LIXALLY' L I. L
eusaen�s «
dl.c.il, sw AW DODeWS? lCll fill
Wry NW5.. Zl<c�I /YY� 1�`•/
win dE! 1 l
YJf�i4Y vPoKus VISIO OWJ TA SLKS YNU(ABILIT'1 I n� �� -
� �f FWY�?NIEJIAL = _`
�_ lE ouuuL uayansuP
AT Lp(AL 9JR+IE'(S INCLUSIpI
marl-uucuu DwCEIEp(
ae�woNowe" �'
MAINTAIu THE OFF UADFW.$ ASSESS BUILDING STYLE
SMALL. TOWI ATMOSPHERE NEK IBa2NooD"AFFDRDABI� HDLt51�IG
FOR MIDDLE WCOME HA49EHOWS
DRAFT VISION STATEMENT
"E DM O NDS IS A W ELCO M I N G CITY
OFGERING 0UTSTAND ING QUALITY OF LIFE FORALL
WE VALUE CNN AO N MENTAL STEWARDSHIP, VI8 RANT AND DIVERSE NEIGH 60P1400IDS,
SAFE AND HEALTHY 5TREETS, AND A THRIVING A ATS SCENE" WEARE EN6A6 ED RESIDENTS
S WHO TAKE.AYIDE114SHAPINGOUR RESILIEATfiffUkE°
UKIILIL I pakA {D
W LjakboO6, 4aslAcr
MAINTAIN AND RE"I&THE FAVIRONMEnIr
SPECIFICALLY TREE5 AND MAR9ILAN0
OgtO WITH
EnWwIc+�NPAI.
murDaln tpwau►Iln�s �
ryL� ➢IV62� ( l
Cu LTURF>
�an�mu+a
V ad O �
r KEEP
ul 111 �T
1.0 111 4 t� SYALLTOI
� ll' (1l lyI 111<l ((l ?m1DSPHf
CLLI
IWCQWWCR DNERSvrY AND 6JG40E PEOPLE.
MWE OF AWTOWN ED,tiroNOS(THE Baal.)
r I MARS
AAD fftAT. -WY-F-
ANO jAff-TY
URFAS& WALKAWIUTI AMD A03LBS
To AABLK. T-RAAIS(r
Packet Pg. 305
`C s
EDM_
•112[9
• Comprehensive Plan Branding
O
;40 0
S
EDMO
: es . Visio
V01 c
TODO
--- Z . Ana Vision • Planificacion
Su Vo
oil
zaoF�
INV .�1�
9.B.g
CU
a
d
. p5-pMQN Join the conversation Q
E
Scan to take a survey
and provide input on
a City vision. it
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update I Packet Pg. 306
�L OPJDS
EDM:
Goal
ftNAM
:l 1t0
To receive 3,500 comments
from the community
8,500 comments
were collected!
9.B.g
E;.,acri
goal.
I.-
L
Q
EVE
EVENT: 5�A*AEK WAAU 7O
Participant Tally���y� DATE:/Z7 V
��t4rty•Vabn.HaP: .,K" -////777(/////l STAFF:60—,q p, µt.lCrrc LE i Ro5 to
PAGE: of CL
COMMENT SUMMARY LOG THEME N
_ ---- - —
�De i��— -- -- ----- - X
d
7 Ig- - - — - - — - - Z
i to
04
--._ 'K ��� pl ��ki• Lam. `!c-4d iri [�ble��Cl �-------�--- -- - - ----j Li
c
-
1 '0 Vtj - -
pare dos e��s "
rrtGon°�^ Ao.Arv�Cov�
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update 11 Packet Pg. 307
�L OPJDS
EDM:
Survey
Provided in Korean, simple Chinese, and
Spanish
Qualitative (open-ended) and quantitative
(multiple-choice) questions
.•• •.
7
�Ci'Yt�Rl�'
A'IONDS
2024T f"n
�.
,v tttilMR
�f Edmonds 9h�R��, �,
Ift
�7R�1) 9]1�i11!p17it Edmonds't'k?
EOMONp5
Vision del Plan Integral 2024
cultura
lAyudenos a saber cdmo es !a diversidad de Edmonds!
1. LSiente que su etnia y cultura tienen representaci6n en
Edmonds? LQu6 etnia(s) y cultura(s) le gustaria ver mejor
representada en Edmonds? (140 caracteres)
2. LQud puede hacer la ciudad para reconocer y celebrar
mejor la diversidad cultural? (140 caracteres)
a,t. S g.
w
9.B.g
WIM
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update 11 Packet Pg. 308
=0
Coffee Chats
THEMED NEIGHBORHOOD CONVERSATIONS
Weekly articles
HELP PUT WEEKLY THEMES INTO CONTEXT
J
Table at local events �
MEETING PEOPLE WHERE THEY ARE
..............
N
C'D•'"0 - plan E'er
41MMA W
Yard signs
RAISE AWARENESS
Multi-lingual branding
PROCESS OF BUILDING TRUST
C
•l1191KW
Panel discussion
IN-DEPTH CONVERSATIONS ON KEY TOPICS
FROM SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS
Walk &Talks
EXPLORE KEY TOPICS IN REAL WORLD SCENARIOS
Online surveys
ALLOW INDIVIDUAL EXPRESSION
'
DSEaTPo 0 0
9.B.g
_
a
d
CL
E
0
U
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update 11 Packet Pg. 309
,.�_ We talked. We listened. We documented.
voic,
S7
fail
vo---
i
goo
9.B.g
9.B.g
:I:Fol 24=6 ■ [01 M [==o 1 •I:
•111[ar=
• In 20 years, I envision an
Edmonds that...
"Our kids can afford to live in"
Q
_
E
U
Q
--------------------------------
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update I Packet Pg. 311
utu- s
EDM :
En 9r70
0
0
"Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life
for all. We value environmental stewardship, vibrant and
9.B.g
_
a
d
CL
E
0
U
a
diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, and a thriving x0)
arts scene. We are engaged residents who take pride in
shaping our resilient future."
------------------------
EDM�..........- plonf W�r WE N�AR�
Voices • Vision
CONOT1(a=�/�
�aE
Access
OUR Wa�2r,¢a�r s LI wi,4
4 wtluk w�oMo�s III
QPROACy WNgT DD Y o
�v Laauy
\ DSw dp pgOUfEDMD�IQS? �j �,L UuswEss �� L 111
FUEL D�
MIt 4Yvaa 10 — A19jTATAL �auaBWry'
ONUFIE StgURDSiIP O
AT LLO AL INCLUADA =® �
WG
� "nS ml loiu pVFBII
MAILITAIIJ T C� ADS ASSESS BVILDINQ STYLE
SMAIL-TOWN ATMOSPHERE FfiR NEK�NBa2NooD-AFFoRDABIEtf�asl�IG
FOR MIDULE INCDME HOULSEHOLVS
PRAK VISION STATEMENT
`E DM 0 NOS IS A W E`LCO M I N G CITY
OFFERING OUTSTANDING QUALITY OF LIFE FORALL
WE VALUE ENV IRO N MENTAL STEWARDSHIP, VIBRANT AND ONEtSE AEIGROORNOODS,
SAFE —AND HEALTHY STREETS, AND A THRIVING AATSSGENE. WEARS ENGAG ED RESIDENTS
A WHO TAKE RBDG IA SHAPING OUa RESILIENT WIUREY
LAW" I49ULLO —
W LlkwW Oer U-Asiecr
/0OMIC 6030
D IN ' IN �MD�IO A
Ate � a� aIt,TURE RAsWTEU d
J Aefn 2 WITH
MI%gAkF AND RESFoR�THE UVIROKMEMT
SPKIFKALLY TREE5 AND MAULAND
EnyyR,t CliINPAI-
fAWDRITy CDMNIMNAES
C% �
��� ➢Iur�sE
Cu U NIR S
RAM11M �r�
Z V
LPL ter+
Ll A E I
t0 lL LLCct (ILLo Q
r L _
1_4IA3LI i 0
�j
E
M I DREf(1BU�
s
V
IKICREASWt DIVERSITI AND UCAG6 PEOPLE
OUTSIDE OF RWAITOWN EDMDNDS(TH BDIAIL)
ROAD MANT S
AN 0 .Y1FETy �� Q
IAICREASE WALMBUTI AND ACLESS
T
Packet Pg. 312
EDMS_
DRAFT COMMUNITY VISION STATEMENT
• Feedback was drawn from six weekly themes:
• Identity
• Quality of Life
• Economic Growth
• Environment
• Culture
• Livability & Land Use
• Statement was developed based directly on commonly used
words — very little editorializing to stay true to collective
community feedback
• Draft vision statement was vetted to make sure the terms used
translated positively in other languages
7e I WNTWt
h • seems '§'
skimoP�ngUSlr�eSS representation ■ especially ,,eneW�
care
om Pmc,fsns prarking
'� "Ite; �buildingI""' -. "CdiVerse.a�, ."— transportation
eta,are.as Just re�lta ru r-fa=nt}c.�
m110 M6 rart
gym, if ethnicity ■ beach bike
_�� }s d ewa I lcsol/d�.
middle
Waz
_cars better gt
- isresidentiaPa NesicQen A:M_o /��Stre2tS%less
mne u
.wish
natura�lbig
waffimy
°P }
marsh
p a�
uarks��
P., n • P
y love
irdable
ai,C.
9.B.g
_______________________________________________________________________________
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update I Packet Pg. 313
EDMS_
"Edmonds is a welcoming
city offering outstanding
quality of life for all. We
value environmental
stewardship, vibrant and
diverse neighborhoods, safe
and healthy streets, and a
thriving arts scene. We are
engaged residents who take
pride in shaping our resilient
future."
9.B.g
Commonly used words: Community (259), diverse/diversity
(205), culture (204), friendly (92), represented (92), welcome
(60), quality (40), different (33), multi -cultural (29), respect
(26), inclusive (25), opportunity (15), acceptance (12),
acknowledge (8), kindness (7) tolerance (7)
_______________________________________________________________________________
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update I Packet Pg. 314
EDMS_
"Edmonds is a welcoming
city offering outstanding
quality of life for all. We
value environmental
stewardship, vibrant and
diverse neighborhoods, safe
and healthy streets, and a
thriving arts scene. We are
engaged residents who take
pride in shaping our resilient
future."
Commonly used words: Trees (408), environment
(93), green (76), marsh (39), canopy (39), open space
(30), streams (22), habitat (16), stewardship (5),
wetlands (5)
9.B.g
_______________________________________________________________________________
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update I Packet Pg. 315
EDMS_
"Edmonds is a welcoming
city offering outstanding
quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship,
vibrant and diverse
neighborhood, safe and
healthy streets, and a thriving
arts scene. We are engaged
residents who take pride in
shaping our resilient future."
Commonly used words: Small town (211),
walk/walkable/walkability (209), restaurants (147), art
(138), building (135), neighborhood (86), charm (68),
shops (68), vibrant (20), historic (18), commercial (16),
village (11), entertainment (11)
9.B.g
_______________________________________________________________________________
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update I Packet Pg. 316
EDMS_
"Edmonds is a welcoming
city offering outstanding
quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship,
vibrant and diverse
neighborhoods, safe and
Healthy streets, and a
thriving arts scene. We are
engaged residents who take
pride in shaping our resilient
future."
9.B.g
Commonly used words: Street/road (181), safe/safety
(163), sidewalk (156), parking (125) bike/bicycle/cycle
(103), traffic (87), walkability (77), green (76), cars (54),
transit (45), speed (44), pedestrian (40), bike lane (39), kids
(35), pollution (31), transportation (27), slow (22), health
(18), fast (15), lighting (14), crosswalk (13), traffic calming
(8), stormwater (7), litter (6), fossil fuel (3)
_______________________________________________________________________________
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update I Packet Pg. 317
EDMS_
"Edmonds is a welcoming
city offering outstanding
quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship,
vibrant and diverse
neighborhoods, safe and
healthy streets, and a
thriving an ; scene. We are
engaged residents who take
pride in shaping our resilient
future."
Commonly used words: Restaurants/eateries
(156), art/artist (138), music (24), creative (9),
ECA (4), performance (4), art culture (4),
9.B.g
_______________________________________________________________________________
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update I Packet Pg. 318
EDMS_
"Edmonds is a welcoming
city offering outstanding
quality of life for all. We value
environmental stewardship,
vibrant and diverse
neighborhoods, safe and
healthy streets, and a thriving
arts scene. We are engaged
residents who take pride in
shaping our resment future."
Commonly used words: nature/natural (141),
affordable/affordability (101), environment (93),
climate (39), sea -level rise (33), expensive (26),
sustainable (23), future (22), gas (20), historic (18),
economy/economics (14), housing options (10),
resilient (3), disaster (3), crisis (3)
9.B.g
_______________________________________________________________________________
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update I Packet Pg. 319
9.B.g
c
�a
a
m
y
c
as
as
E
0
U
N
CL
d
r
N
x
m
z
c
0
.y
C
R
a
a
E
0
U
N
CR
M
N
I
U
U
c
a>
E
t
v
r
r
Q
c
d
E
t
v
Q
Packet Pg. 320
�L OPJDS
EDM :
onina Outre
0
August 6 — Edmonds Community Fair
Wednesday Afternoons Popsicles in the Park
4-5:30 pm
August 9 at Civic Park
Additional dates/locations to be included on website and
distributed via email list and social media
Pop -Up Events throughout the City
Focused on neighborhood commercial centers
throughout city
Starting August 17 at Five Corners
Additional dates/locations TBD
September 9 — Porchfest
More information to be posted on project website
W"
"119KF
9.B.g
r
_
a
d
m
d
L
Q
E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update 11 Packet Pg. 321
�L OPJDS
EDM:
9.B.g
a•
i 1 Launch formal 30-day scoping period
r Host numerous events and offer a variety of ways to engage
Develop growth alternatives to study in EIS
Launch Community Champions Advisory Committee
5 ;;. Briefings at Planning Board and City Council
_______________________________________________________________________________
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update 11 Packet Pg. 322
Is -
Gam` CAL$
EDM�
2022
2023
2024
0
12"X9 ■ 'Rel r:
Am1■■arAM
9.B.g
a
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update 11 Packet Pg. 323
9.B.g
Thank you'.
EdmondsWA.gov/EveryonesEdmonds
everyonesedmonds@edmondswa.gov
425-775-0220
10.A
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/11/2023
October 11 Extended Agenda
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michael Clugston
Staff Recommendation
Review and discuss the October 11 version of the Planning Board Extended Agenda (attached).
Narrative
The Planning Board update presentation to City Council was moved to December 5 to account for
upcoming budget discussions.
Attachments:
October 11 Extended Agenda
Packet Pg. 325
10.A.a
Planning Board Extended Agenda - October 11, 2023
>.
r0
o
a q
>.
r0
v
N
C
v
-4
C
oo
N
—
r�4
-4
—
6
N
0q
Q
Ol
co
Q
m
N
N
n
m
c-I
N
v
m
rl
N
v
�
N
V
O
ti
c-I
U
O
Ln
N
>
O
z
00
>
O
Z
ry
N
>
O
z
M
N
U
v
Ln
U
UJ
O
rn
rl
V
v
9
r,
N
C
.
o
1-4
v
N
N
LL
v
c-I
N
�
00
N
BN Zone Use Change (Citizen -initiated Code Amendment)
PH
Tree Code Update (Property Owner/Development - Code
Amendment)
D/R
D/R*
D/R
D/R
D/R
Prop
I Devt
D/R
Devt
PH Prop
& Devt
Critical Aquifer Recharge (Code Amendment)
I
D/R
PH
PH
PH
D/R
PH
Recommendation on Athletic Field Use & Reservation Policy
D/R-
6 pm Special Meeting with Council - 2023 Housing Legislation
Comprehensive Plan Discussion
I
D/R
D/R
D/R
D/R
D/R
Design Standards and Processes, Impact of HB 1293
B
Highway 99 Community Renewal Program Update
D/R
D/R
Parks, Recreation & Human Services Quarterly Report (^
Biannual presentations)
R
R
R^
Capital Improvement Program/Capital Facilties Plan
I
PH
D/R
Planning Board report to City Council
PLN2023-0024 - Rezone Proposal from RM-EW to BC-EW
I
PH
PH
Accessory Dwelling Units, Impact of HB 1337
1
1
1
1
1
1
1B
Annual Retreat
B
Climate Legislative Package
B
Highway 99 Landmark Site Discussion
I
* Joint Meeting with Tree Board
September 19 Joint Special Meeting with Council (5:00 pm)
November 29 special meeting in lieu of November 22
KEY
I- Introduction & Discussion
PH- Public Hearing
D/R- Discussion/Recommendation
B- Briefing
R- Report with no briefing/presentation
Future Items
Neighborhood Center Plans
Additional Code Modernization Projects
Comp Plan Goal/Policy Review
Housing Bills Policy Implementation
Packet Pg. 326
