Loading...
2023-10-17 City Council Packet2 3 4 5 6 of c�,y s Agenda Edmonds City Council REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 OCTOBER 17, 2023, 7:00 PM PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AUDIENCE COMMENTS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. RECEIVED FOR FILING Edmonds City Council Agenda October 17, 2023 Page 1 1. Claim for Damages for filing (0 min) 2. Mayor Youth Commission Appointment (0 min) 3. Council Appointment to a Board/Commission (0 min) 4. Written Public Comments (0 min) 7. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Special Meeting Minutes October 3, 2023 2. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes October 3, 2023 3. Approval of Special Meeting Minutes October 10, 2023 4. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 5. Approval of claim checks and wire payments. 6. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with WSP for construction management services on the 76th Ave Overlay project. 7. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for Highway 99 Stage 2 8. Approval of Supplemental Agreement with WSP for Highway 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project 9. Amending ECC 5.05.122 F.1-Ammending the Dangerous Dog Statute 10. Amending ECC 5.01.010-Adoption of RCW 9.94A.835 (Special Allegation -Sexual Motivation) 11. Amending ECC 5.36.045-Creation of the crime of Vehicle Trespass 12. Verdant Grant Acceptance 8. CLOSED RECORD REVIEW 1. PLN2023-0024 Rezone at 9530 & 9620 Edmonds Way (45 min) 9. PUBLIC HEARING 1. 2024 Budget Public Hearing #1 (15 min) 10. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Parkland Acquisition Purchase & Sale Agreement - Mee Property (20 min) 2. Year in Review / Decision Package Presentation (90 min) 3. 2024 COLA for non -represented employees (15 min) 4. Proposed 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program (30 min) 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS ADJOURN Edmonds City Council Agenda October 17, 2023 Page 2 6.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Claim for Damages for filing Staff Lead: NA Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages for filing. Narrative William Wisner 18218 80th Ave W ($1,208.31) Attachments: Claim for Damages - Wisner - for council Packet Pg. 3 6.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Form Received by City Please take note that \A/ r 0 vvN ► � h E-4 who currently resides at mailing address S [fie S home phone # work phone # and who resided at n t1 at the time of the occurrence and whose date of birth is _ is claiming damages against C6 �-,� et �d V&t 6 in the sum of $ ftO ^ J arising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: CI " �� " 2 O L 3 TIME: 7j tJ — Z O in LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: DESCRIPTION: 1. Describe the conduct r_ : V-r c, C 1. m L O circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the inl�ury or damage. E vk v V "-& k ma i GCS W ti� t k t .1% C-20 2 L g- V-elll J \ A1,0iJ1.--7kCA . (attach an extra sheet for additional iAformation, if needed) 2. ovide a list of witnesses, if applicable, to the occurrence includinq names, addresses, and phone numbers. P a.An coal ay.� 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimates for repair. 4. Have you submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: Yes _�K, No Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page t of 2 Packet Pg. 4 6.1.a This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. 10--2-70 2`5 o _ Signature of Claimant Date and place (residenti.41 address, city and county) Or Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m, to 4:30 p.m. E 2 U Form Revised 04/09/2021 Pack 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 5 s.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Mayor Youth Commission Appointment Staff Lead: Carolyn LaFave Department: Mayor's Office Preparer: Carolyn LaFave Background/History Volunteer boards and commissions serve our community by providing advice and recommendations to the Mayor and City Council regarding programs, activities, and issues unique to their mission and purpose. Staff Recommendation Narrative Mayor Nelson appoints Lydia Abuni to Youth Commission position 11, Alternate. Packet Pg. 6 6.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Council Appointment to a Board/Commission Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Volunteer boards and commissions serve our community by providing advice and recommendations to the Mayor and City Council regarding programs, activities, and issues unique to their mission and purpose. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Councilmember Will Chen appoints Vivian Liao to the Youth Commission, Seat 3. Councilmember Diane Buckshnis appoints Cassidy Otis to the Youth Commission, Seat #5. Councilmember Vivian Olson re -appoints Mariana (Mara) Yenter to the Youth Commission, Seat #6. Packet Pg. 7 6.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Written Public Comments Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of written public comments. Narrative Public comments submitted to the web form for public comments <https://www.edmondswa.gov/publiccomment> between September 21, 2023 and October 11, 2023. Attachments: Public Comment October 17, 2023 Packet Pg. 8 6.4.a Edmonds City Council Public Comments — October 17, 2023 Online Form was submitted 10/3/2023 9:03:20 PM FirstName Natalie LastName Seitz CityOfResidence Edmonds AgendaTopic SR 99 Planned Action Comments I am providing public comment as a resident of Edmonds. I would like to comment in support of the Councils consideration of the repeal of the planned action ordinance for the SR99 area. I have sincerely wished that this discussion would not have been necessary, but it is clearly required. We continue to see in CIP after CIP that do not include the scale of investment necessary to support growth r = in the SR99 area. Repeal does pose risk but also opportunity to individually consider the displacement E and other environmental impacts of new development. The need for community involvement and c regulatory mechanisms to consider these impacts is urgent, delay continues to put this community at v risk. The City has already approved development and seen proposals that do not meet the planned action vision of 3-4 story apartment buildings and mixed use commercial, repeal would give this 3 a community the ability to meaningfully participate in what is being approved. I would like to thank the r w council members who worked so hard to bring this topic forward for discussion. Packet Pg. 9 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Approval of Special Meeting Minutes October 3, 2023 Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Approval of Council Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda. Narrative Council meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: 20231003 Special Meeting Packet Pg. 10 7.1.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES October 3, 2023 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT STAFF PRESENT Neil Tibbott, Council President Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Vivian Olson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember Mayor Nelson 1. CALL TO ORDER The special Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. 2. EXECUTIVE SESSION The Council then convened in executive session to discuss pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i). The executive session concluded at 6:45 p.m. 3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION The meeting reconvened at 6:45 p.m. ADJOURNMENT With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. SCOTT PASSEY, CITY CLERK Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 1 Packet Pg. 11 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes October 3, 2023 Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Approval of Council Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda. Narrative Council meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: 20231003 Regular Meeting Packet Pg. 12 7.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES October 3, 2023 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Neil Tibbott, Council President Vivian Olson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE STAFF PRESENT Whitney Rivera, Municipal Court Judge Uneek Maylor, Court Administrator Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director Angie Feser, Parks, Rec., & Human Serv. Dir. Kim Dunscombe, Deputy Admin. Serv. Director Rob English, City Engineer Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec., & Human Serv. Dir. Mike De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. by Mayor Nelson in the Council Chambers, 250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute. 2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Councilmember Paine read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water." 3. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT, TO AMEND THE AGENDA BY REPLACING ITEM 9.3, DRAFT ORDINANCE REGARDING REPEAL OF ORDINANCE 4079 HIGHWAY 99 PLANNED ACTION, WITH AGENDA ITEM, REPEAL OF ORDINANCE 4079 HIGHWAY 99 PLANNED ORDINANCE SPONSORED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 1 Packet Pg. 13 7.2.a Councilmember Buckshnis commented there is some confusion regarding why this was not included in the packet. She has spent a tremendous amount of time on this item and asked Council President Tibbott if she could amend the agenda by substituting her agenda item because she goes into detail and would like to be part of the discussion. Councilmember Chen requested Item 7.5, Approval of GFC Analysis and Adoption of a GFC Rate Ordinance, be removed from the Consent Agenda for a brief discussion. Council President Tibbott raised a point of order, pointing out Councilmember Chen's request was not related to the motion and could be considered when the council considers approval of the Consent Agenda. Mayor Nelson ruled point taken. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Tony Shapiro, Edmonds, referred to the ordinance the council approved recently regarding dogs on Bracketts Landing out to the jetty, and asked the definition of a sanctuary beach, whether there were different gradations of a sanctuary beach, and which gradation that beach is. He asked how a person walking a leashed dog along the paved walkway from the ferry access point to the jetty and back posed a greater threat to wildlife than a person walking without a dog. If the overarching concern is unleashed dogs on the beach, he suggested there were other options for the City to pursue such as placing signs requested people text a picture of the unleashed dog and their owner to a specific number. People realizing they could easily be reported may be a better deterrent than the action the council took. Edmonds has 1-2 miles of beachfront in an urban area and a charming downtown that leads to the beach. People come to the beach year-round to walk. With scuba divers and people frequenting these sanctuaries, he questioned the legitimacy of the designation. When government imposes ordinance that do not make sense to citizens, citizens begin to lose respect for the government and this is one such ordinance. Georgina Armstrong, Edmonds, speaking on behalf of the Edmonds Climate Advisory Board, said when speaking to a climate mentor in another city in the region about implementing climate action plans, they told her, "A city spends a lot of money writing these plans, a lot of staff manhours and community outreach where citizens spend time to provide the city with input. If you don't implement that plan effectively with your best effort, the members of the community can get discouraged and not want to help anymore. If that happens, then you've shut off an important future path to collaborating and connecting with the public. These are the risks associated with a climate action plan that is not moving forward." There has already been a failure with the 2010 CAP which was allowed to languish for 13 years. There was some progress made in the municipal sector, low hanging fruit for a city, but that CAP was never implemented in the community sector nor was it ever funded by any city council. As a result, according to the 2023 CAP, "the most important finding of this update is that the Edmonds community has not kept pace with its goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions." Ms. Armstrong continued, the community sector accounts for a whopping 98% of the total GHG emissions for the City, and municipal emissions account for only 2%. Focusing on the 2% will not get close to the lofty targets set forth in the 2023 CAP including the long term goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. She did not want that to be the fate of the 2023 CAP since its targets exceed those in the 2010 CAP. Hiring the climate action manager including in the mayor's proposed 2024 budget will significantly increase the odds of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050 by working on each of the 61 action items that must be accomplished to meet that goal. A climate action manager will have the necessary expertise and experience Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 2 Packet Pg. 14 7.2.a to lead and coordinate a whole city climate action effort and focus adequate time and attention on the community's need to significantly lower GHG emissions. This is the conclusion drawn by many cities in the region in adjusting their tactics to correspond with their climate action goals. It is time for Edmonds to join them. In March, when the council adopted the 2023 CAP update, the council was all in on a call to action. Such action will require funding and if the City is to achieve the CAP's targets, a climate action manager is definitely needed to orchestrate an effective community response. Marlin Phelps, Marysville, said after he learned he could corroborate what happened to him with other victims, he got affidavits. He also did a public records request for all Robert Barker's arrest records. Robert Barker never worked in the field, he was in the courtroom every day. He paid a third person to review the arrest records because he believed every one was criminal act. What they found was deplorable; that man did some really, really bad things. The person who is reviewing the records is also cross-referencing the arrests to any missing person reports because he believed there were several. Josh McClure and Jim Lawless knew what was going on. When an internal review of the police department was done, Lawless resigned; Mr. Phelps believed there was something that caused that. Tomorrow he planned to do a public records request for the summary of that internal review. There were hundreds of deplorable criminal acts by hundreds of people. It is incumbent on the council to look at those because they are absolutely frightening. Chris Eck, Edmonds, spoke in favor of the 2024 budget priorities for the City, in particular the top one, safe places to walk and drive. That is definitely a priority for her and her family in Westgate as people zoom by going to PCC; and as she talks to people in the community, she hears this resonating with many of them. She highly encouraged council to fund this very important and vital priority. Along with safety, she also encouraged the City to continue funding human services. It was her understanding hundreds of community members have been served by human services and she believed there was nothing more important than taking care of Edmonds' citizens. Pam Tauer, Edmonds, speaking on behalf of the Mayor's Climate Protection Committee, relayed the committee's support for including a climate action manager in the City's budget. As Ms. Armstrong stated, the CAP was developed 13 years ago but little progress has been made. Without the focus provided by a climate action manager, the City will be in the same situation. Climate action deserves a dedicated resource focused on implementation, reporting and development of climate adaptation and mitigation plans. She envisioned the climate action manager would also coordinate with active and interested environmental groups in the community to promote education and engagement. Edmonds needs a leader in the City's offices who can entirely focus their efforts on the goal of achieving carbon neutrality in 2050. The City cannot wait another 13 years to begin implementation of the CAP. A climate action manager position is long overdue and needs to be included in the City's new budget. Nancy Johnson, Edmonds, retired RN and co-chair, Snohomish and Island Counties Sierra Club, commented on the mayor's proposed budget. She loves living near Yost Park in an area that is quite walkable. She can get groceries and go to the library, the hardware store and the drugstore without ever getting in her car. However, traffic has worsened recently and she has seen several scary near misses including children walking or biking to school. She was delighted to see traffic safety as a budget priority with school zone speed cameras, cameras at six unsafe intersections, and more traffic calming devices. She found it disappointing that Edmonds wasn't further along in addressing the climate crisis. However, the 2023 CAP is a good one if the necessary actions can be taken and the results monitored to ensure steady and measurable progress. Everyone has seen the headlines; weather disasters around the world and in Washington which are predicted to get worse. Edmonds also needs to be concerned about things like sea level rise. Therefore, she strongly supported the proposed new positions for a climate action manager and a grants manager. Recent federal legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law as well as Washington State's Climate Commitment Act will be instrumental in crafting the response to the existential challenge of climate change. The climate action manager and grants manager Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 3 Packet Pg. 15 7.2.a can work together to prioritize and fund the most effective actions to mitigate the climate crisis and adapt to new conditions the City will surely face. Barbara Steller, Edmonds, a member of Advocates for Justice Environment at the Edmonds United Methodist Church and the Interfaith Climate Action Group, spoke tonight for the trees and the CAP which champions more tree canopy in the City. She was grateful the CAP champions more tree canopy, but she was concerned with two developments soon to take place near her home, a block from WinCo. First, at the intersection of 220t' Street & 76t' Avenue, mature trees will be cut down to expand and improve the roadway primarily for the benefit of vehicular traffic. Second, on a 4+ acre site with old growth trees that abuts 220' Street and the cul-de-sac where she lives, the property is pending sale to the Housing Authority of Snohomish County who has an agreement with the City of Edmonds to operate within its limits. Nearby residents are concerned with further loss of tree canopy and the wildlife that depends on it. She asked who she should contact to voice her concerns about the environmental impacts of these pending changes under the CAP, if there was a provision for oversight of the hard work required to implement the CAP, if there was a City employee with that task in their job description and if not, would someone be hired to enable the plan's timely implementation so the City will be carbon neutral by 2050. Aside from strategies for trees, environment and land use, the plan lists many high to low ranked strategy actions for the City. For example, under transportation 5.2, convert city fleet to electric vehicles. She asked whether the budget included costs and timetable for replacement of gas -powered vehicles and equipment. Another example under buildings and energy, if someone chooses to convert their gas -heated home to an electric heat pump and water heater, who do they notify of this action especially since residential GHG emissions are cited as a significant issue. Someone on the City's staff must manage seeing the planned actions through to fruition. Nora Carlson, Edmonds, a resident of the Westgate neighborhood, expressed her thanks for the recent installation of the rapid beacon lights and signage at the intersection of 96t' & 224', a busy school crossing for Westgate Elementary School and the neighborhood. Children, parents, neighbors and staff at the school look forward to the eventual installation of the school zone safety cameras later this year at the busy intersection of 96' & 220t'', also a school crossing. Many people have been involved over the past few years in the efforts to increase the safety of both intersections including neighbors, parents, and staff, which was pivotal to the positive outcome. She greatly appreciated the support of Mayor Nelson, Chief Bennett, Oscar Antillon and Bertrand Hauss. She also thanked councilmembers for their encouragement over the past few years with special thanks to Councilmembers Susan Paine and Vivian Olson for their advocacy for the increased safety measures for these intersections. She summarized patience and persistence pays off in the end. Theresa Hollis, Edmonds, said she was proud of the turnout tonight during public comments, recognizing the council does appreciate hearing from the public. She referred to agenda item 9.3, possible repeal of Ordinance 4079 which controls development in the Highway 99 planned action area. In April 2023 when then -Planning Manager Levitan was meeting with the planning board, he informed them that planned actions are no longer a commonly used technique in municipal land use planning. In August 2023 when the mayor and other candidates for office attended their neighborhood potluck on Madrona Lane, near the Highway 99 Gateway District, Mayor Nelson told them the Highway 99 planned action didn't work and asked them to look forward to the body of work that was being kicked off in the comprehensive plan update that would include new development policies and a new Citywide EIS. Staff has indicated the planned action did not work and was not commonly used in other municipalities and she fully supported the motion to repeal the planned action. 6. RECEIVED FOR FILING CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FOR FILING 7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 4 Packet Pg. 16 COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. Councilmember Chen requested Item 7.5, Approval of GFC Analysis and Adoption of a GFC Rate Ordinance, be removed from the Consent Agenda and added to the agenda as Item 9.1 for a brief discussion regarding how the rates were calculated, and renumber the remaining Council Business Items. He explained his intent was to have Public Works explain. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: 1. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 19, 2023 2. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 26, 2023 3. APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES SEPTEMBER 26, 20234. 4. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS 8. PUBLIC HEARING 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED 2024-2029 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City Engineer Rob English introduced staff present for this item: Public Works Director Oscar Antillon; Senior Utilities Engineer Mike De Lilla; Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director Angie Feser; and Deputy Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director Shannon Burley. Mr. English reviewed: • CIP versus CFP CIP CFP 1 6-year maintenance 6-year capital Long-range (20-year) projects w/funding projects w/ capital project needs sources funding sources • Components found only in the CIP OComponents found only in the CFP O Components found in both the CIP & CFP o CIP is primarily a budget tool that projects a project list for six years. It includes capital improvement projects to improve infrastructure, but also includes maintenance for infrastructure ■ First three years are a constrained list of projects with secured funding or funds reasonably expected to be secured. ■ Second three years are projects that do not necessarily have an identified funding source. Unfunded projects are included on the list to assist in pursuing grants. Public Works & Utilities 2024-2029 CFP & CIP o Combined CFP & CIP Document ■ Transportation ■ Utilities - Water - Stormwater - Sewer o Facilities o Wastewater Treatment Plant Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 5 Packet Pg. 17 7.2.a o Comparison to previous year • Citywide Project Maps CFP & CIP Format Capital zoz4 aDoject List Facilities Decision P Budget Project Numb Amount Preservation i Maintenance Projects PWT01 Annual Sisal Praaambon $1,600,000 $2.400." $1300,000 $2,630000 $2630000 $2,630000 $13,190000 $39.450000 $52,640.000 Program PWT-03 16M Ave W Ovedoy hum 1%th $20000 s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20000 $0 $20.ODD SL SW to Olympm Vlew D,. PWT 04 Main SL Overlay hum 6th Ave_ to $789,553 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $789,553 $0 $789.553 'Al, Ave PWT-05 Paget Or OVD Sgml Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $00000 $4WOOD $0 $M6000 $0 $566.000 PWT-06 Signal Upgm - 1001h Ave/ $0 $0 $0 $165,000 $773.000 $o $938,000 $0 $93800 238th St. SW PViT-07 kloin St i 3M Signal Up9mdes $0 5O $0 $0 $110000 $383010 $49.3000 $0 $493,OOD PWT41 Oymplc V—Dr Overlay-1960, §0 $200000 $1300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1500,ODD $0 $1500000 SR 524 to Talbot Rd PWT-60 B80, Ave Overlay anO Sidewolk $150.000 $1,350.000 $0 SO $0 $0 $1,500.000 $0 $1.500000 Repo,, Safety / Capacity Analysis "tilh St sW tram R. 99 Ie 95th _ Project Sheets o Project description o Project benefit o Estimated project cost o Expenditures by phase — programmed for 6 years o Funding sources it _ _ _— ® <r�twi 4[[[am aa¢� atwum c.w� Ce® f[<sa xta4r. ...ru. m ssu[ya Park: & Recreation Laka Balllgper Park/MOVntIak, Ter Ir I• ..1. ailnm �l [HMMSMY. rye .r�. ttam. u U[e 41n1tt A; yqm u u ✓riq w< Wrnmr I. de mo [mWemn ur ue hakn.wedalm:ne vs:em eq.mrry Ma<wn. <[nmas mr m<; rr. ,,cu Inero.:.mv.lt eroeue rogC.ymmre�m2 nstrna rne.e.eei.rcmmivnn�upn..me rmwvMn erne r[.[em.rvmae[ar<[gmm mon<r�nn�rrsoq..<oo�.<wia ,.arw«<a my m.<[[�r:nw[< 9mrga:e,,vua 4 I Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 6 Packet Pg. 18 7.2.a 2024 Public Works Comprehensive Plan Update o Transportation & Stormwater/Surface Water Management Plans ■ Updates will generate new project lists for next year's CIP/CFP Public Works & Utilities - Transportation 2024 Pavement Preservation Projects 0 2024 Pavement Preservation Program ($1.5M) ■ Construction - 6 Lane Miles 0 2025 Pavement Preservation Program ($ I OOK) ■ Design 2024; Construction 2025 o Main St. Overlay 6th Ave — 8th Ave ($790k) ■ 2024 Construction ■ $750K Federal Grant ■ 11 New ADA Ramps 0 88th Ave Overlay & Sidewalk Repair ($150K) ■ Design 2024 0 76th Ave Overlay Close-out ($20K) 2024 Safety & Cgpaciiy Projects o Hwy 99 Revitalization/Gateway ($114K) o Hwy 99 Stage 3 244' St-238' St ($1.2M) o Hwy 99 Stage 4 224' St-220' St ($1.2M) 0 76' Ave/220t1i St Intersection ($650K) o SR-104 Adaptive System ($186K) o Traffic Signal Upgrades ($30K) 2024 Active Transportation Projects & Planning o Transportation Plan Update($236K) o Citywide Bicycle Improvements($15K) o Elm Way Walkway($ I OK) o Traffic Calming Program($IOOK) o Pedestrian Safety Program ($80K) Public Works & Utilities - Utilities 2024 Water Utility 0 2024 Replacement Program ($3.3M) ■ Construction 2024 ■ 4,000 ft of Watermain Replacement 0 2025 Replacement Program ($426K) ■ Design 2024; Construction 2025 o Yost & Seaview Reservoir Final Design ($850K) ■ $3.5M-$4M rehabilitation cost for each reservoir ■ 2025-26 Construction o Waterline Overlays ($225K) 2024 Stormwater Utility o Storm & Surface Water Comp Plan ($350K) o Perrinville Creek Basin Projects ■ Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration ($275K) ■ Perrinville Creek Flow Mgmt ($100K) ■ Perrinville Creek Basin Update ($594K) o Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Impr ($90K) o Lake Ballinger Floodplain Purchase ($120K) 0 2024 Replacement Program ($1.3M) o Stormwater Overlays ($315K) 0 2025 Replacement Program ($324K) 2024 Sewer Utility Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 7 Packet Pg. 19 7.2.a 0 2024 Replacement Program($2M) ■ 800 ft of Sewerline Replacement 0 2025 Replacement Program($363K) o Cured in -place pipe rehabilitation ($522K) ■ 4,000 ft of sewer CIPP rehab o Sewerline Overlays($60K) 2024 WWTP o WWTP Annual Capital Replaement ($500K) o Carbon Recovery Project ($500K) o Nutrient Removal Project ($350K) o Gasification Bypass ($300K) o Condition Assessment ($150K) o Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) Upgrades ($250K) o Primary Clarifier 2 Rehabilitation ($600K) Public Works & Utilities - Facilities o Boys & Girls Club o Historic Museum o Cemetery Building o Library o City Hall o Meadowdale Club House o Fishing Pier o Old Public Works o Frances Anderson Center o Parks Maintenance Building o Fire Station 16 o Public Safety o Fire Station 17 o Public Works O&M o Fire Station 20 o Wade James Theater o Historic Log Cabin o Yost Pool House Unsecured Funding $862,240 4% 016-bond $585,000 3% Transportation Impact Fees $423,361 2% Fund 112 $251,570 1.1% ARPA Funds $114,000 0.5% General Fund Other0.4% cityortynnw d Other ru • 2024-2029 Funding General Fund Fund 112 Other 0.3% ARPA City of Lynnwood Other Facilities 016 bond/non-bond $2,013,645 0.7% Transportation Impact Fees $1,923,065 1% a CIP/CFP Schedule o July ■ City staff begins development of capital budgets o August Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 8 Packet Pg. 20 7.2.a ■ Submit proposed Capital budget to Finance ■ Prepare draft CFP and CIP o September ■ Joint Presentation City Council/Planning Board (September 19th) ■ Planning Board Public Hearing (September 27th) o October ■ City Council Public Hearing (October 3rd) ■ Planning Board Recommendation/Approval (October 1 lth) ■ City Council Discussion (October 17th) ■ City Council Discussion/Approval (October 24th) o November ■ Adopt CFP w/ Budget into the Comprehensive Plan (November 21 st) Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director Angie Feser recognized the efforts of Deputy Parks, Recreation and Human Services Director Shannon Burley in preparing the CIP/CFP. She presented the Parks 2024-2029 CFP/CIP: • 2024-2029 Parks CIP/CFP Framework o Department Staff Resources o PROS Plan Capital Recommendations 1. Acquisition to Fill Park System Gaps - Secure additional land for neighborhood parks to address gaps 2. Open Space & Conservation Acquisitions - Pursue acquisitions that adjoin city properties or conserve unique natural areas 3. Park Development & Enhancements — significant repairs needed for aging infrastructure 4. Yost Pool Replacement - Refine options for the replacement of Yost Pool 5. Trail Connections — Needed to help link destinations across the community 6. ADA, Accessibility & Other User Convenience Enhancements - Remove barriers and improve universal access o PROS Plan Goals (9) 1. ENGAGEMENT - Encourage and facilitate meaningful public involvement in park and recreation planning. 2. DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION - Decrease barriers and provide increased opportunities for participation and representative cultural, heritage and art programs, events representing the diversity of Edmonds demographics. 3. PARKS, TRAILS & OPEN SPACE - Provide an interconnected park system that offers a wide variety of year-round recreation opportunities and experiences which support and enhance Edmonds' cultural identity and the natural environment. 4. WATERFRONT USE & ACCESS - Preserve and pursue opportunities to expand public access and enjoyment of Edmonds' waterfront. 5. NATURAL RESOURCE & HABITAT CONSERVATION - Conserve and provide access to natural resource lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education. 6. CLIMATE CHANGE, ADAPTATION & RESILIENCY - Adapt to climate change and increase local park system resiliency by improving environmental conditions, stewardship and sustainability in parks, trails, open spaces and recreation facilities within planning, development, maintenance, and operations. 7. RECREATION PROGRAMS & FACILITIES - Provide a varied and inclusive suite of recreation opportunities and experiences to promote health and wellness, year-round activity and social engagement. 8. CULTURAL SERVICES - Provide arts and cultural opportunities and experiences to promote an engaged and vibrant community. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 9 Packet Pg. 21 7.2.a 9. PARK OPERATIONS & ADMINISTRATION - Maintain and operate a modern, efficient park system that provides a high level of user comfort, safety and aesthetic quality, and protects capital investments. • 2024-2029 Parks CIP/CFP Geographic Distribution * Non -site specific projects A2 , P2, D13 Neighborhood Park SE 1 A3, P6, D1S Neighborhood Park SR99 A4, P7, D18 Neighborhood Park SE 2 R17 Otywide Park Improvements R10 Signage & Wayfinding 2024 Projects 2025 - 2029 Projects • Parks 2024-2029 CIP/CFP Format Costs Inflated at 3% per year CFP Prot Pcl Protect Ske B, lksuloNon 2024 1 2025 1 2026 1 2027 1 2028 1 2029 6-Yaar Tool Leke Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA'CARRYFORWARD' FD—loperent, D19 funding to support C rty of Mcumlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase 111 5 200,OD0 $ 5 5 - 5 5 - $ 200,000 Payment due upon completion of project, DS Matluy Ballinger Park'CARRYFORWARD' D6 Construction of improvemeots imludine permanent restroom, paved traa, picnic S 271.300 S 5 $ - 5 5 $ 271,300 D7 theater ADA access and (Aber aneeraties. "I Creak Restoration 'CARRYFORWARD' R19 Stream I—Ith ant erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TOD based $ 120,ODD $ 390.000 S - $ - $ - $ - 5 500,000 on study. Study in 2024, work in 2025- R9 Yost Park A Pool R4 Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to Include resurface of tennis courts S 154,300 S 1.296,400 5 - $ $ S $ 1.450,700 R6 and trail, bridge and boardwalk rrpaks(repkarrment in 2024, inclusive Rll playground and pool upgrades in 2025, Columbarium Expansion - Phase II D8 Expansion of the current columharlumfunding provided through the Cemetery 5 - $ 159,100 5 S $ - 5 S 159,100 Trust rued 137. Woodevay Campus AUletic Complex - Phase I - lighting In, oupenalion ee 41, the Edmonds Sc hool Dnlr[l. cumpletr a doinmundy park R o20 and alh IPIK complex at rormrr Woodway High School to include lighting and 1,500,000 for we construction of Iwo additional fields, f4rVibcrho ed Park SE I lI Manse plan and developmentnew neighborhood of a neneighborhood park In South Edmonds $ - $ 79,600 $ 819,5D0 $ - $ - $ - $ SWIM D13 (funding is in Parkland Acpuhllion program for putchae)- Sierra Park R8 PLvyground replacement and upgrade to inclusive standard%. $ - $ $ 415,000 $ _ $ - 5 $ 415,000 R7 Olympic Beach Park lit—alion of .-line rrstrooms S $ 21111,000 $ 33,000 $ - Si - $ $ 53,000 • Parks 2024-2029 CIP/CFP Funding Overview Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 10 Packet Pg. 22 7.2.a PARKS CIP REVENUE 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Yew Total Real Estate Exclse Tax (BEET} I • Fund 126 S 200,000 $ 200,000 S 200,000 S 200,000 S 200,000 $ 200,000 S 1.200,000 Real Estate Exclse Tax(REET)II-Fund 125 S 2,000,000 S 1,500,OD0 $ 1,500.000 S 1,S00,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,ODD $ 9,S00.000 Park Impact Fees -Fund 332.100 S 30D,000 5 30D,000 $ 300,ODO $ 300,000 S 300.000 $ 300,000 $ 1.800,000 Tree Fund 143 • land Acquisition S 215.000 $ 215,000 $ 215,ODO S 215,000 S 215,000 S 225.000 5 1,290,000 Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - Columbarlum Expansion 5 159.1DO 5 159,100 ARPA Contribution- Shell Creek Study S 120,000 5 • $ • S • S • S : $ 120,000 Investment Interest 13%) IS 18,918 S 24,795 $ 30.84915 37,08515 43,5071 S SO,122 $ 205.277 Donations Ills - 5 -$ is Is 1 $ 5 Bond Proceeds Secured Grans- UnsecuredGrants/Funding- nowland acquisition Ills IS 1,500,000 15 1,945,OD0 I S 5,48L200 15 81 S24,7S6.800 S 34.552,500 (E) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE JIS 2.853.918 I $ 3,898,895 1 $ 4.190,849 1 $ 7.733,285 I S 1,129.007 1 527,021.922 $ 49,926.977 Parks Fend 6-rear overview 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 IF) eginning Fund Balance $ 3,150,795 $ 3,061,113 $ 1,316,908 $ 17,857 $ 1,214,742 $ 1,817,349 (E}Revenue $ 2,853,918 $ 3,898,895 $ 4,190,849 $ 7,733,285 $ 3,128,007 $27,021,922 (D) Expendnu $ 2,94, 3600 $ 5,643.100 $ 5,489,90D $ 6,536,400 $ 2.525,400 $ 26,559,455 G Endin Fund BaWnce (F�E-0 3 06 113 31IS 08 17,857 S LZ14,742 S 1,817.30 S 2,279,317 Current/Ongoing Capital Projects o Civic Park close out o Shirley Johnson property structure demolition o Mathay Ballinger Park improvements (2023-2024) o McAleer Lake Access Upgrade o Maintenance of Oak Tree (5t1i & Main) o Parkland Acquisition Program o Deferred Maintenance/Small Capital Projects ■ BLN shower replacement ■ Cemetery gate repair ■ Mathay Ballinger Apollo Swing replacement ■ Park restroom door (12) automatic locks ■ Viewer repairs Parks 2024-2029 CIP/CFP Projects o Highlight - 2024 Projects ■ Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA- D 19 (DP) Conswction(D19)-ILA 2024 2025 2026 2027 5200,000 2028 n• S2DO,000 Total Expenses $200,000 $200,000 Real Estate Excise Tax ll - Fund 125 $200,000 $200,000 Total Revenue $200.000 $200,000 • Interlocal agreement to support development PROS Plan of phase 3 which Includes improved access for G3-1 3.2, 3.8, 3.11 G5 -15.2 Edmonds residents Rec.- 3.6 • Estimated Cost $200,000 ■ Mathay Ballinger Park - D6 (Carryforward/DP) Construtoon(D(5)- Permanent Restroom 2024 2025 $271,300 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total $271,300 Total Expenses S27L300 S271,300 Real Estate Excse Tax II - Fund 12.5 5271,3D0 $271,300 Told Revenue 5271,300 $272,300 PROS Plan • ADA parking and paved pathway 62-Obj2.6 • Shelter with Picnic Tables G3-Obj3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8, 3.9 • Permanent Restroom G9-Obj9.1 - 3.1, 3.3, 3.5, 6.2, 6.4 Rec. • Estimated Total Cost: $499,300 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 11 Packet Pg. 23 7.2.a Shell Creek Restoration — R19 (Carryforward) 2024 Construcion (R19)— Creek Restoration $120,000 20251 $380,000 $500,000 Total Expenses $120,000 S380,000 $500,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $380,000 $380,000 ARPA Funding Transfer $120,000 $120,000 Total Revenue $120,000 $380,000 $500,000 I • Study to determine scope & obtain permits - 2024 PROS Plan • Restorative work - 2025 G3—Obj 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 • Estimated Cost $500,000 G4—Obj 4.2, 4.4 G5 — Obj 5.1, 5.3, 5.4 G6 — Obj 6.5 G9 — Obj 9.1, 9.2 ■ Yost Park & Pool R9, R4, R, RI I (DP) "a 2025 2026 207 2028 2029 Toll lhuecured Furdiig $0 $0 SD Trail / Bridge Repair— 2024 Tennis Court Resurface — 2024 Playground Replacement - 2025 Pool Upgrades — 2025 Estimated Cost: $1,450,700 PROS Plan Gl - Obj 1.1,1.4 G3 - Obj 3.6, 3.8, 3.9 G4 - Obj. 4.4 G5 - Obj 5.4 G6 - Obj 6.5 G9 - Obj. 9.1 Rec. - 3.1, 3.4, 3.10 Rec. - 6.2 Parks 2024-2029 CIP/CFP Projects o Columbarium Expansion — Phase 2 o Woodway Campus Athletic Complex — Phase 1 Lighting o Neighborhood Park SE 1 o Sierra Park o Olympic Beach Park o Renovation of existing restrooms o Pine Street Park o Johnson property o Neighborhood Park SR99 o Park & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building o Maplewood Hill Park o Neighborhood Park SE 2 o Waterfront Walkway o Seaview Park o Elm Street Park o Pool replacement o Meadowdale Playfields o Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Programs — Highlight 2024 projects o Signage & Wayfinding — R10 (DP) Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 12 Packet Pg. 24 7.2.a Planning& Construction (RIO) 2024 2025 2026 2027 $75,000 2028 2029 Total $75,000 Total Expesnes $75,000 $75.000 Real Estate Excise Tax ll - Fund 125 $75,000 $75,000 Total Revenue $75,000 $75,000 unsecured Funding so so Trail identification, orientation markers, safety & regulatory messaging, park hours, park rules and etiquette, interpretive information and warning signs. • Estimated Cost: $75,000 PROS Plan G2 — Obj. 1.1, 1.3 y ea} Y G3 — Obj. 3.6 G5 — Obj. 5.3, 5.4 G9 — Obj. 9.1 _ Rec. — 6.2, 6.5 o Citywide Park improvements/Capital Replaement Program o Parkland Acquisition Support o Debt Service and Interfund Transfers • 2024-2029 CIP/CFP - Parkland Acquisitions o Parkland Acquisition — A2, A3, A4 (No DP- Council Authorization) 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total . . r Unsecured (SMXO" G�-`_r (6—mil • Neighborhood Parks SE1 • Acquisition as Feasible • Estimated Cost: $1,500,00 PROS Plan G2 — Obj. 2.1 G3 — Obi. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.9 Rec. —1.1 o Interurban Trail o Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Changes to CIP/CFP CFP I CIP COMPARISON f2024 TO 2029) PROJECTS ADDED PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION None CFP I CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029) PROJECTS REMOVED PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION mParksiPlayground Ballinger Access McAleer Proct coin loton scheduled in 2023 on Pro Demolition Demolition to becoin lete in 2023 Upgrade Program I IPlayground upgrades identified! each year, no need for additional program CFP I CIP COMPARISON 12024 TO 20291 REVISED Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE Parks Colum barium Expansion - Phase II Funded through CemeteryTrust Fund 137 - scheduled in 2025 vs. 24 Parks Elm Street Park Improvements Separated into planning In 2027 and construction in 2028 vs. 2026 Parks Interurban Trail Expansion Moved to 2029 vs. 28 Parks Johnson Property Master Plan Removed demolition master plan scheduled in 2026 vs. 25 Parks Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA ILA completed in 2023, payment due upon construction completion in 2024, carryforward Parks Maplewood Hill Park Plavaround replacement moved to 2027 vs. 25 significant price increase Parks Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements permanent restroom installation scheduled to take place in 2024 car forward Parks Nei hborhood Park SEt, SR99 SE2 X Master Ian antl construction of all three parks pushed back one year must acquire first Parks OI m 'c Beach Park Improvements Separated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs- 24 Parks Parkland Acquisition/Neighborhood Parks X All three bumped back one year to 2024. 2025 and 2026 Parks Pine Street Park Improvements Separated into planning in 2025 and construction In 2026 vs. 24 Parks Seaview Park Improvements Restroom replacement moved to 2028 vs. 27 Parks Shell Creek Restoration Plan carried forwa rd to 2024; restoration in 2025 vs. 24 Parks Signage and Wayfinding Price increase to S75K vs- S51 500 Parks Yost Park & Pool Improvements Playground replacement moved to 2025 vs. 23 significant Price increase due to topography Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 13 Packet Pg. 25 Mayor Nelson opened the public hearing. Jay Grant, Edmonds, a Port of Edmonds Commissioner but speaking for himself tonight, explained he has been involved in public budgets for many years, all directly related to public safety and security of critical infrastructure. He referred to the beginning balance of $6 million in the 2024 proposed budget, commenting he found that frightening compared to balances in other years. In 2023 there were ARPA funds and one-time monies, and in 2024 the City is expecting major grants. He referred to fines and forfeitures and asked the source of those funds. He noted although property values and property taxes are increasing, revenue has been about $14-15M, approaching $16M, but he did not see any justification for the forecast for property tax to decrease by $4-5M, a significant amount. He hoped his questions would be answered, noting the budget is a very important topic. Mayor Nelson reminded this is a public hearing on the 2024-2029 CIP/CFP. [No name given], Edmonds, said she was impressed with improvements and the creation of more parks in Edmonds, noting she moved to Edmonds 20 years ago for the parks and open spaces. As much as she loves parks, pedestrian safety needs to be a priority for the City. She walks 4-5 miles/day; one of her main routes is 80'h Ave W between 188'1i Street SW and Olympic View Drive. There is a sidewalk improvement project in the CIP for that area, funded in 2027 and 2028. That is a dangerous section of road and she has seen people with strollers in the street in areas where the road crests and cars cannot see them because the area next to the road is full of mud six months of the year. She has fallen a couple of times when walking on that stretch of the road. Many people walk that stretch of road because it goes to Seaview Park and other lovely places in Edmonds that are great to walk to. She urged the council to make pedestrian safety projects a priority and specifically that section on 80' Ave W between 188' Street SW and Olympic View Drive. Jim Ogonowski, Edmonds, thanked staff for the great overview provided by their presentation. He referred to the proposed utility rate increases and the additional bonding in that proposal versus the CIP/CFP, advising he did not see the correlation he would expect. There were some comments about revenues for some of the projects, but he did not see the bonding portion. The utility rate study suggests the City will be bonding in addition to a double-digit rate increase, but the revenue section of the CIP/CFP does not necessarily suggest the same integration of revenue streams. He suggested looking at that to be certain it is cohesive and transparent. Chris Kelly, Edmonds, a resident of the Seaview neighborhood, expressed appreciation for the presentation and the work staff is doing, commenting it is exciting to see the future and to be a resident of Edmonds. He referred to PWT-68, the 88't' Ave overlay and sidewalk repair, advising as a resident of the area, he appreciated the City's investment in the long needed underground infrastructure and appreciated resurfacing the roadway as it is pretty bumpy. He was disheartened to see that the scope of the project was an asphalt sidewalk and not a long -life, low maintenance concrete sidewalk as there are elsewhere in the City. Many property owners along the planned project route have already invested in concrete sidewalks as a result of City development requirements and codes. He requested the scope of the project be changed from an asphalt walkway to a concrete sidewalk. If funding is an issue, he suggested this may be a candidate for the Safe Routes to Schools program as it provides direct access to Seaview Elementary within two miles. Mr. Kelly referred to PWT-17, 196'' Street SW/88' Avenue West intersection improvements, explaining he is a 30+ year regular user of this intersection as a driver, pedestrian and bicyclist. He looked forward to this project coming to fruition from a safety point of view. The stated justification for the project is to improve vehicle level of service; he requested the description be expanded to reflect a Complete Streets approach with marked and signalized crosswalks. In addition to providing safe and convenient access for all modes of travel, construction of sidewalks will provide residents who live north of 196t /Puget Drive/SR 524 easy access to Maplewood Hill Park, a highly underappreciated City asset and inaccessible to Seaview Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 14 Packet Pg. 26 7.2.a residents without a vehicle. He also asked that the scope of the project be expanded to include a short, approximately 100-foot, sidewalk on the south side of Puget Drive from 88' Avenue W to the intersection to the existing marked entry of the park boundary. He suspected the legislature's passage of Move Ahead Washington will mandate Complete Streets and appreciated the council's support and acknowledgement of that. He was opposed to any short or long term solution that would limit movement of north-southbound traffic to right turn only. Theresa Hollis, Edmonds, commented the plan uses priorities for walkways that were established in 2015 which is before city council decided to put almost all new housing growth in the Highway 99 subarea. This CFP ignores housing growth decisions made regarding the location of future density. She requested getting transportation priority planning in sync with development planning. When the TIP was presented to council in June, the new sidewalks on 84't' Street were planned for 2024, however, this version of the CIP has it planned for 2027. One of her neighbors drives their electric wheelchair in the road on 84' ; a sidewalk on 84' is definitely needed now. She requested the timing of the sidewalk from 76t1i Street to Highway 99, PWT-50 be moved up to 2025. That has been a dangerous route for a long time for pedestrians walking to/from the park, Safeway or the bus. She did not support the amount of spending in the Green Streets demonstration project. To her way of thinking, a Green Street was a Tesla and residents would be happy with a used Prius. Residents just want some kind of walkway, asphalt or concrete, so they do not have to walk in the street, especially when walking kids to school. To this point, she requested adding a project for a paved walkway on 236' between 84't' and Edmonds Way, the route to Madrona School which would support the neighborhood where development will eventually happen on the empty lot at 236' & 84'. She expressed support for the increased funding in 2024 for traffic calming. With regard to parks, she supported the emphasis on the maintenance and repair backlog and the investment in access to Lake Ballinger. With no further public comment, Mayor Nelson closed the public hearing. Council President Tibbott requested councilmembers keep questions at a general level. There is a lengthy agenda item at the October 17 meeting for council discussion. Staff has requested councilmembers submit questions on specific projects to them so they can be summarized and provided for the October 17 meeting. He anticipated the council will continue to receive emails on this topic; it would be a great opportunity for councilmember to include those questions at the October 17 meeting. Council President Tibbott relayed his understanding that the planning board planned to discuss and make a recommendation on the CIP/CFP at their October 11 meeting. He asked that the council receive their comments prior to the October 17 meeting. Ms. Feser advised staff discussed the turnaround on the public hearing with the planning board. The planning board's meeting is October 11, the information for the October 17 packet is due October 12; the planning board is committed to having that completed on October 11 so staff can include it in the agenda packet due on October 12. Council President Tibbott acknowledged that information would be very helpful for the council. He reiterated a significant portion of the October 17 meeting would be devoted to discussing the CIP/CFP and getting answers to questions councilmembers submit to staff. Councilmember Nand said she would email project specific questions to staff. She inquired about ADA accessibility for playgrounds, noting a lot of signage on playgrounds in Edmonds parks include an age limit such as the equipment should only be used by those under the age of 12. However, families with differently abled adults may want to bring them to the park. Europe has been experimenting with all ages parks so the public and seniors have engagement and exercise opportunities. She wondered whether there could be a shift toward an all age component in playgrounds. Ms. Feser answered there is a difference between ADA and inclusive. ADA is meeting the requirements to provide equitable access; inclusive takes that much farther and creates an enhanced play experience that goes beyond just access. Inclusive level playgrounds address what Councilmember Nand mentioned. The playground improvement at Seaview Park was the first inclusive playground followed by Mika's Playground at Civic Playfields. The plan is to have the next couple Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 15 Packet Pg. 27 7.2.a playground replacements be inclusive level. The goal is to create play environments at a level that is inclusive, multigenerational and multi -ability that welcomes everyone. Councilmember Nand commented she was a fan of that. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the transportation plan update would utilize the multimodal design. Mr. English answered the intent is to update transportation impact fees to a multimodal level of service. With regard to Perrinville, Councilmember Buckshnis observed the lower creek design was $900,000 last year and those funds were not used. Now the project is only $275,000. Mr. English answered over $900,000 was planned to take the project to 60% design; that included a ARPA allocation which was reduced. The reduced amount will get the project to 30% design in 2024. Councilmember Buckshnis asked whether the council would be provided an update on Perrinville. She wanted to know more about the $594,000 and the partnership with Lynnwood. Mr. English advised Mike De Lilla was instrumental in securing the grant from Department of Ecology. Mr. De Lilla answered $594,000 is the total cost of the project and includes grant funds from DOE, and matching funds from Edmonds and Lynnwood. That project will update the 2015 basin analysis that was done for the flow reduction study and will include additional sites and more due diligence. The sites are listed but based on the projects done so far, geotechnical work needs to be done as well as look at infiltration rates to see the true potential of some of the sites that are considered the best or most fruitful. The cost is split 50150 with Lynnwood; having a team of cities helped obtain the grant. He is working on an interlocal agreement (ILA) that will spell out all the details as far as responsibilities between the two parties. He is also working on an RFQ for a consultant; the contract will be over $100,000 and will require council review and approval. He was hopeful the study could begin next year. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the basin is the upper reach. Mr. De Lilla agreed. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if there had ever been thought given to putting Perrinville in Parks & Recreation since it is now considered a nearshore estuary which means an automatic 10 points in grant scoring. The area by the railroad tracks could be a passive park. Mr. De Lilla answered the biggest issue is the City does not own the land and does not regulate the stream as it is waters of the state. The City owns land at the marsh and Shell Creek. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed about green streets, relaying the need for code as a manual is not sufficient. She preferred to build sidewalks in that area versus this big project. She was shocked about the treatment plant and asked if the numbers were realistic, that the nutrient removal project will cost $41 million. Mr. De Lilla answered that was the estimate from the consultant based on data that currently exists. Councilmember Buckshnis said a lot of people have asked about an ILA regarding Esperance Park. She asked about the parks maintenance facility near Esperance. Ms. Feser answered the City is leasing space on 76' to house overflow equipment and staff. Councilmember Buckshnis advised volunteers cut the grass at Esperance Park. She asked if there had been consideration given to an ILA for Esperance Park so the City could help with cutting the grass, animal control, etc. Ms. Feser answered she has not spoken to Snohomish County about a maintenance ILA for Esperance Park. If that is something the council wants to pursue and fund, the budget process is the time to do that. Councilmember Paine observed bicycle infrastructure still includes the word sharrows which she did not consider bicycle infrastructure since it is just paint on the roadway rather than a true bike lane. She asked if sharrows would be used in the foreseeable future or would there be something that designates a proper bike lane. Mr. English answered that will addressed in the transportation update. Sharrows are still an alternative treatment when there is not enough right-of-way for a bike lane. The transportation plan update Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 16 Packet Pg. 28 7.2.a will adopt more of the Complete Streets principles throughout the entire transportation system and he anticipated bike lanes would be more prominent than sharrows if there is enough space. With regard to the transportation plan update, Councilmember Paine said transportation planning needs to be harmonized with the comprehensive plan where there is more planned development which may shift how some areas will look and feel and include appropriate infrastructure. Mr. English agreed, advising the transportation plan will be coordinated with the comprehensive plan. Councilmember Paine said she will submit her project specific questions to staff. Councilmember Chen thanked staff for their hard work and heavy lifting. He expressed interest in an ILA with Snohomish County for Esperance Park, a wonderful facility that Edmonds residents enjoy. There is no permanent restroom at Esperance Park and perhaps that is an improvement that Edmonds could work on with Snohomish County. There are two dog parks at Esperance Park and with the success of Edmonds' dog park at Marina Beach, perhaps the City could share its experience with dog parks with Snohomish County. Councilmember Chen recalled taking a bike ride a couple weeks ago along the Interurban Trail that identified some possibilities for study. He asked if it would be possible to add that to 2024. Ms. Feser answered the bike bridge would be a transportation project, not a parks project. Mr. English recommended evaluating that along with other projects in the transportation plan update. Councilmember Chen commented Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood and Shoreline are interested in working together so the bicycle bridge could be a multijurisdictional effort. He will email project specific questions to staff. Councilmember Teitzel said as he thinks about southeast Edmonds, there is a lot going on there including improvements on the corridor to streets and infrastructure, improvements at Mathay Ballinger Park, and the ILA with Mountlake Terrace to provide access to their park, making it a very attractive, walkable area. There is a definite need to focus on pedestrian safety in that area and he recommended prioritizing the 238' Street sidewalks (PWT-50), in the CIP/CFP in 2030-2044 which he felt was too far out in view of the need for pedestrian safety. He plans to propose an amendment to the CIP/CFP to exchange the timing of that project with PWT-64, Green Streets on 236' St SW which is scheduled to start in 2025. He preferred that the 238' walkway start in 2025. 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. APPROVAL OF GFC ANALYSIS AND ADOPTION OF A GFC RATE ORDINANCE (Previously Consent Agenda Item 7.5) Councilmember Chen asked public works staff to explain the calculation, particularly for the storm rate increase. He referred to the PowerPoint on packet page 45 that reflects the stormwater rate going up from $799 to $,3122, approximately a 300% increase. He understood costs went up during the 2023 study versus the 2011 study, but the equivalent service unit (ESU) concept needs to be explained. In the 2011 study the ESU was actually higher than the 2023 study so it seems counterintuitive that as development occurred during the last 12 years, the cost increased but the ESU decreased. Public Works Director Oscar Antillon reviewed: • General Facilities Charge (GFC) Definition o A one-time charge at the time of development that recovers a proportionate share of the past and planned capital costs of the City utilities systems. The charge is paid by all customers newly connecting to the City utilities systems or existing customers where the structure has been modified to increase the number of dwelling units, or other changes that require additional capacity. • Background o The GFC is a connection charge that: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 17 Packet Pg. 29 7.2.a ■ Is imposed on development to recover an equitable share of system costs ■ Is based on the cost of existing assets and future capital projects ■ Provides a source of funding for capital projects and/or debt service GFC Methodology G� GFC per ERU = o Key steps: ■ Define the "cost of the existing system" f The GFC calculation ■ Compute interest accrued on existing assets should only include costs ■ Define the capital improvement program funded by the utility ■ Define the applicable system capacity Mr. Antillon advised the reason the ERUs (denominator in the above calculation) for stormwater decreased slightly is because the analysis was based on available land. The only way to change that is if land is added to the City. The number decreased slightly based on information provided by Snohomish County regarding available lots and zoning. The numerator is quite a bit higher which is the reason for the significant percentage increase. Councilmember Chen said during the last 12 years there are many new buildings in Edmonds which means the usable land would increase rather than decrease. He asked if the surface increases by adding more buildings. Mr. Antillon answered no surface was added; the City did not grow. Buildings were added and the density increased, but there is the same amount of land; stormwater fees are calculated using available land. Mr. De Lilla explained the 2011 data assumed a base number that was already developed. The way the model was built assumed a growth factor for 20 years. That growth factor assumed a growth in population which translated to buildable land. The issue with that model is it is based on county data and zoning, there is only so much impervious surface where building can occur in the City. The old model projected there would be more impervious area than could possibly ever be built. The new data, based on Snohomish County Buildable Lands, assigns zoning for single family, multifamily and commercial and each has an equivalent amount of area that is allowed to be impervious. The new data showed, based on the Snohomish County data, that this is as much impervious surface there can ever be based on the Buildable Lands report. Mr. De Lilla continued, the issue between storm, water and sewer is that storm GFCs are purely based on impervious surface which is a very limited resource. A lot of capital projects have occurred which adds to the overall asset value; a higher asset value but not a lot of increase in the denominator, the GFCs will increase tremendously. Water and sewer, which is based on population, buildings can be added and the overall population growth is unlimited so the numerator and denominator increase at the same time which is why water and sewer have not increased a lot. Councilmember Chen said he wanted that explained so developers know why when they are paying a fee three times higher. COUNCILMEMBER CHEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT, TO APPROVE THE UTILITY RATE INCREASE ORDINANCE. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 18 Packet Pg. 30 7.2.a 2. OVERVIEW OF UPCOMING BUDGET PROCESS Administrative Services Director Dave Turley commented as the council just received their budget books last night, he did not expect a lot of in depth questions tonight. This agenda item is an overview to get the ball rolling. He reviewed the 2024 budget season: • What to expect; o This is the last year we will be doing a one-year budget. We will be doing this process again in the Fall of 2024, but then it will be for a two-year budget. o Producing the 2024 Proposed Budget is the culmination of more than six months of hard work. o A tremendous amount of effort and collaboration has gone into preparing for this budget season: ■ Council Retreat ■ Council Resolution for Budget Priorities ■ Several Council -sponsored budget outreach events ■ Extensive planning and coordination between the Council President (with input from Council members), the Council Legislative Assistant, and the Administration - Mr. Turley recognized Council Legislative Assistant Beckie Peterson for her assistance with making the process as efficient as possible ■ Close examination of the schedule - for example, in an effort to improve efficiency, the CIP/CFP presentation schedule has been changed, which we hope will eliminate some overlap and redundancy o We are pleased to be able to deliver the Mayor's Budget Message and the Proposed Budget not only on time as promised, but we have actually delivered it to you earlier than in previous years! ■ Dates the budget was delivered to council, past 10 years: - 10/2/2023 - 10/3/2022 - 10/4/2021 - 10/5/2020 - 10/8/2019 - 10/9/2018 - 10/10/2017 - 10/11/2016 - 10/13/2015 - 10/ 17/2014 What to look for in budget book: a. Table of contents, Mayor's Budget Message b. Sample ordinance c. Resolution 1526 - Establishing Council Budget Priorities d. Org Charts e. Strategic Outlook and Fund Balance Analysis f. Tables and Charts that summarize the budget g. Property Tax Information, Authorized Positions, Salary and Wage Tables h. List of Decision Packages i. 145 pages of budget information by fund, department, cost center j. 98 Decision Packages (fewer than previous years) Budget Season calendar o Department presentations to provide insight and context to the budget: October 3, October 10 and October 17 o Further CIP/CFP Discussions: October 17, October 24, and adoption November 21 o Public hearings on the budget: October 17, October 24 and November 6 o Budget Workshops: October 19 and October 30 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 19 Packet Pg. 31 7.2.a o Council Budget Review and Discussion: November 6 and November 14 o Dates set aside for further Review and Discussion if needed: November 16 (Thursday), November 18 (Saturday), November 20 (Monday) o Final Review and Adoption of the Budget: November 21 Inflation: Biggest impact to 2024 budget is inflation o Inflation in the past couple years has been higher than any time in the past 40 years o Inflation is a fact of life. Costs go up. We recently experienced record inflation globally, especially during 2021-2022. Edmonds was not exempt. o While costs continue to rise, the City has not had significant increases to General Fund Revenues in decades. This has placed a continually increasing strain on our ability to deliver services to the public. o Inflation over the last couple of years has hit the General Fund hard: ■ Contract for Fire and EMS services: $4 million ■ WCIA insurance: $.5 million ■ Salaries & Benefits, to remain competitive with other cities and hold onto staff ■ Inflation hits all costs — supplies, professional services, vehicles, fuel, utilities, etc. What to expect in the budget o While the 2024 proposed budget reflects the values and priorities of the mayor, council and the residents of Edmonds, this is not the year for growth in the budget o Barebones budget this year, only about 20 General Fund decision packages, nearly all of them designed to maintain current service levels o Only two new General Fund positions, one of which is designed to increase revenue o Happy to meet with councilmember individually to discuss, answer any questions What to expect tonight o "Year in Review" from the Municipal Court and the Administrative Services Department (first of 3 such presentations) o Format was requested by Council and provides background information and additional `Bi Picture" context for Council and the public to better understand departmental budgets o Brief review of decision packages (deliberations will come later when council has had ample time to digest budget) Mr. Turley described a proposal for a different process this year; ;the council's legislative assistant executive volunteered to collect councilmember's decision packages, comments and suggestions and put them on the website organized by category. This will make it more accessible to everyone and allow councilmembers to check the list before submitting a similar decision package. The list will be more accessible on the City's website and easier to understand. Council President Tibbott expressed appreciation for the calendar. There will be more presentations from staff about their program areas as well as opportunities for the council to discuss the budget. Tonight is an opportunity for councilmembers to ask high level questions; specific questions can be asked at the meetings when budget discussions are scheduled. The council does not typically meet on the fifth Tuesday; there is an informal budget workshop scheduled in the Brackett Room to work through the budget and discuss council decision packages. He suggested tonight councilmembers ask questions about navigating the budget document rather than regarding specifics which will be discussed later. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to the calendar, advising there is no interrelationship with the CIP/CFP. Upon further observation, she noted the calendar included further CIP/CFP discussion on October 17, October 24 and adoption November 21. Councilmember Buckshnis inquired about the public hearing on the CIP/CFP, also noting there was no public hearing regarding revenues. Mr. Turley advised there are public hearings on October 17, October 24 and November 6; the budget season calendar was intended to be high level and he did not identify the topic for the public hearings. Council President Tibbott advised Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 20 Packet Pg. 32 7.2.a the public hearing on the CIP/CFP was held tonight. There are two public hearings on the budget, October 17 and 24', and regarding revenues on November 6. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the budget schedule was truncated to ensure Councilmember Teitzel was part of the budget team. She suggested the council think about that because she felt the person that will take his seat should be part of budget process. She recalled in 2021 there was a huge mishap in how that was handled and hoped there would not be a push to approve the budget before the election is certified. Councilmember Olson referred to Council President Tibbott's comment about meeting on the 5t' Tuesday and observed the 5' Tuesday is Halloween. She asked if the budget workshop would be held on Monday or Tuesday. Council President Tibbott said the workshop was on Monday, October 30. Councilmember Olson referred to the use of ARPA funds for the General Fund to balance the proposed budget and wondered if other approaches were considered and how the conclusion was reached that that was the best approach. Mr. Turley said as much as possible has been done to identify other revenue sources. There have not been any significant revenue increases in at least 20 years and that is not something that can be done overnight. That was the biggest challenge in determining how to shore up reserves during 2024. A levy, doing something with the fire contract, or other options such as instituting a B&O tax, would not take place in 2024, they would occur in at least in 2025. Therefore the ARPA funds were the only alternative to make the 2024 budget sound. Councilmember Olson asked for confirmation that there were no other alternatives to consider. Mr. Turley said he was very, very happy to talk with councilmembers and listen to their ideas. He was not saying this was only the alternative, but after putting the budget together, that was the best thing they come up with and it is a sound, responsible budget. If council can make improvements before it becomes the council budget, he was happy to listen and work with the council to incorporate them. With regard to the 2024 budget being barebones as proposed and more or less maintaining service levels, Councilmember Olson observed she did not see the landmark project in the budget or the CIP/CFP. She asked how the landmark and greenbelt projects fit into the budget as she did not see a plan for spending. Mr. Turley said most of the questions he gets and the work he does is related to the General Fund. The landmark project would have little impact on the General Fund. If the City were to purchase the property, it would be from bond money or something like that with bond payments only for a few years. He said he was getting out of his comfort zone as he was not directly involved with the landmark project, but did not think the intent was to buy the property and own it for the next 30 years. He assumed the intent would be to buy it and be a partner in developing it and likely sell it at a profit to a developer in a few years once the City had an opportunity to participate in the concepts and development. It has relatively little impact on the General Fund in the next couple years. Councilmember Olson observed bond payments would be a General Fund expenditure. Mr. Turley answered not necessarily, it could be from REET, impact fees, etc. Councilmember Nand asked if there were any dates/time in the budget season calendar to discuss the RFA contract and potential annexation. Mr. Turley said that is not built into the calendar. The resolution was sent to the RFA last Wednesday and he has not heard from them. The ball is in their court to tell the City their next course of action. Councilmember Chen thanked Mr. Turley for the timeline and offering to work one-on-one with councilmembers. He asked about carryover, recalling in 2023 there were carryover budget amendments in March that increased spending by over $4 million. He asked how that would be handled in 2024. Mr. Turley answered that would be 2024 budget amendment question which is outside the scope of the 2024 budget. He was confused by Councilmember Chen's question because in the past he has been concerned about the beginning fund balance changes, but tonight he was asking about the magnitude of carryforwards. He Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 21 Packet Pg. 33 suggested that was a topic better left to when the council has more time to discuss it since it is outside the scope of the 2024 budget. Councilmember Chen said there can be different approaches in developing the 2024 budget, one is incorporating carryover into the 2024 budget. The traditional approach has been not to consider the carryover and then in March/April spending would possibly be increased $4-5M and council will be back in the same situation related to the reserve policy. The estimated General Fund balance will be below the $8.9 million requirement at $6.6 million. A good effort is been made to bring it back by the end of 2024; it looks good now, but if March budget amendments add $4-5 million, it is back to square one, dipping into reserves again. He asked what approach is being taken with regard to carryover. Mr. Turley answered the carryforward budget amendment is supposed to be for capital projects, not operating; therefore, the carryforward amendments almost exclusively affect non -General Fund items such as closing out sewer projects, parks projects, etc. Last year some labor contracts were settled in late December/early January which had a terrific impact on the General Fund. Steps have been taken this year to ensure that doesn't happen and there has been more effort to get everything into the budget to avoid any surprises. Councilmember Chen observed there was also the unexpected South County Fire $2 million increase later in 2023. Councilmember Paine commented this is an exciting time. She was glad to hear everything had been considered and it will be up to the council to look for other revenue opportunities. When the City hears from the RFA and they are interested in talking with Edmonds, she requested a solid timeline for that process. She recognized that would not solve the problem in 2024. Mr. Turley said anything that happens with the RFA will not affect the budget until 2025. Councilmember Paine looked forward to meeting with Mr. Turley and looking at other ideas. Councilmember Teitzel observed much of the budget was driven by assumptions. He asked if Mr. Turley would be willing to prepare a one page summary of budget assumptions such as inflation, estimated timing of the RFA transition, etc. Mr. Turley agreed, commenting that was the nature of the things he would like to discuss with councilmembers when he meets with them individually. Councilmember Buckshnis asked what percentage was included in the budget for salary increases. Mr. Turley said he did not have that off the top of his head. Councilmember Buckshnis said it was important to share that with the public. She suggested slowing down related to the 1% property tax and banking and using banked capacity. From the schedule it seems very fast; there needs to be time to explain to the public the concept of banking property tax increases. She envisioned that would be a very good revenue source, observing the City had several years banked. Mr. Turley advised November 21, 2017 was the last time the council approved a 1% increase, so there has been a less than 1% increase in property tax revenue since then. The amount of inflation since November 21, 2017 was 25%. 3. YEAR IN REVIEW / DECISION PACKAGE PRESENTATION Administrative Services Department Deputy Administrative Services Director Kim Dunscombe explained Administrative Services staff work backstage and it is not always readily apparent what they do. She reviewed: • Department of Administrative Services Overview Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 22 Packet Pg. 34 7.2.a c 0 n a u N Finance Division (8 FTE) o Budget and Reporting ■ Management and preparation for annual city budget, including 33 individual funds ■ Oversee General Fund and other "Managed Funds" ■ Responsible for preparation of annual financial report, monthly reports, and all accounting functions of the city o Audit ■ Annual Financial Audit ■ Annual Grants Audit ■ Annual Accountability Audit ■ Other miscellaneous audits: Sales Tax Audit, Use Tax Audit, Payroll Tax Audit, etc. o Accounts Payable ■ 3,825 - Checks issued year to date ■ 7,940 - Invoices paid year to date ■ 4,070 - Active vendors o Payroll ■ 2022 - 6,512 Pay checks processed ■ 2023 - 4,705 Pay checks processed year to date ■ 50 - New employees ■ 18 - Employee off boarding o Business Licenses ■ 3,574 Active licenses In -City ■ 2,627 Active licenses Non -Resident o Other Managed Funds ■ Non -Departmental ■ LEOFF Medical & Firemen's Pension Funds ■ Debt Service Funds ■ Contingency Reserve ■ Technology Rental Fund ■ ARPA Fund (Accounting Portion) ■ Employee Parking o Utility Billing (2 FTE) ■ Utility Customers - 14,000 for water, sewer, and storm drain ■ 2022 - $27,504,192 billed - 543 closing bills/escrow/ownership transfers ■ 2023 - $19,227,366.59 billed to date - 379 closing bills/escrow/ownership transfers to date Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 23 Packet Pg. 35 7.2.a ■ Phone Automation — Allows our customers to make their payments 24/7/365 — With this new phone system, we can spend more time with our customers that have billing questions, ownership changes, setting up auto pay etc. o Reception Desk (1 FTE) ■ Phones — In 2023 approx. 1,000 calls a month from January through September — Estimate about 12,000 calls per year ■ Parking Permits — 538 Parking permits to local businesses — 1129 Parking permits to City residents o Public Records Division (2 FTE) ■ 1,095 Total number of requests received ■ 1,001 Total number of requests fulfilled ■ 839 Total number of requests fulfilled within 5 business days ■ 17 Requests currently open for more than 6 months o Information Services Division (6 FTE) ■ Help Desk — 683 - Tickets Opened YTD — 642 - Tickets Closed YTD ■ Fix It Edmonds — Released a citizen reporting app that connects people directly to staff. — Through the app, citizens report issues like potholes, vegetation issues etc. ■ Carbon Black, anti-malware tool — This software was installed on all systems; PC's, servers, and networks. — It monitors for illicit activity as a result of viruses or un-authorized individuals. ■ Washington SAO Tech Audit — State Auditor performed a comprehensive technology systems audit for the City. — This is half -way complete with their recommendations already being implemented. ■ Police Dept laptop upgrade — All 49 of the Police Dept's mobile patrol laptops have been upgraded. — Laptops are configured on a new exclusive first responder network from ATT o City Clerk's Office (2 FTE) ■ Public Meetings — 80 Meetings year to date — — 103 public meetings in 2023 — Includes regular, special and all committee meetings ■ Digital Archives — 436 video files ( 200.14 GB) transferred — 2,576 records being prepared for transfer ■ Records Dispositioned — 47 Bankers boxes — — 292 pages of records ■ Laserfiche Content Management System (CMS) — 2,758 uploaded or modified documents — 100,536 uploaded document pages — Document types: Ordinances; Resolutions; Minutes/Agendas/Packets from Council and Boards, Committees, & Commissions; Interlocal Agreements; Contracts; and Public Notices ■ Research Requests — From staff - 112 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 24 Packet Pg. 36 Ms. Dunscombe reviewed the Administrative Services Department's Decision Packages, advising decision packages associated with Non -Departmental will not be presented tonight: • #310-24002 (Finance) o Description Increase the transfer from the General Fund to Fund 009 Medical Insurance Reserve Fund. o Justification The LEOFF Medical Insurance Fund was created in 1995 to establish reserves to cover the long-term health care and other related obligations of LEOFF I retirees. Fund 009's fund balance is analyzed each year to determine if the current transfer amount is sufficient. The actuals for 2022, the year-end estimate for 2023 and the budgeted 2024 expenditures, which are approved by the Disabilities Board, exceed the transfer revenues and are decreasing fund balance. o Funding Source General Fund o Amount $25,000 • #311-24001 (IT) o Description Increase the number of connection licenses from 25 to unlimited for Weblink o Justification Weblink is the public facing interface of the website server providing access to the City Clerks records library and Development Services property files. The city is currently only licensed for 25 simultaneous users, that includes the public and staff. Log -in errors occur when more than 25 individuals are accessing the system. Increasing to an unlimited number of concurrent users will eliminate the resource contention o Funding Source General Fund $13,663 or 91% Water Fund $292 or 2% Storm Fund $84 or 1% Sewer Fund $961 or 6% o Amount $15,000 • #311-24002 (IT) o Description Increase the number of licenses to security log monitoring across the entire organization o Justification Log management is used to trace the processes that transpire when there is a security breach. Our current Technology Security Tool only logs events on required servers. These new licenses would allow us to provide security to all servers and endpoints thereby reducing security vulnerabilities. o Funding Source General Fund $2,277 or 91% Water Fund $49 or 2% Storm Fund $14 or 1 % Sewer Fund $160 or 6% o Amount $2,500 • #311-24003 (IT) o Description Replacement systems including, desktops, laptops, and networking equipment o Justification The city implemented to replace equipment on a specified life cycle. Desktop computers are replaced on a 5-year cycle and laptops are replaced on a 4-year cycle. Networking equipment is replaced when new feature sets are required or when models are no longer covered under patching. This replacement procedure ensures maximum user availability. o Funding Source Technology Rental Fund o Amount $102,500 Municipal Court Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 25 Packet Pg. 37 7.2.a Municipal Court Judge Whitney Rivera advised the court did a state of court presentation in April so they will not be providing a year in review presentation. She and Court Administrator Uneek Maylor reviewed: • Decision package 230-24001 o Passport Expenditure Updates ■ Due to increased passport processing, Edmonds Municipal Court is asking that the bars account for communications (postage) and for rental/lease (printing) be increased - Increase bars account for communications to $10,000 - Increase bars account for rental/lease to $8,500 ■ Paused passport processing in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic ■ Restarted passport processing at the end of 2021 using an appointment system ■ In 2022, EMC processed 128 passports ■ In January 2023, transitioned to walk-in passport processing Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ■ Estimate that EMC will process more than 1,800 passports in 2023, which will generate approximately $65,00 in revenue ■ Expect that passport demand will stay strong in 2024 • Decision Package 23-24002 o Pretrial Monitoring ■ Request a new bars account in the amount of $20,000 for pretrial monitoring of defendants - Electronic Home Monitoring (EHM( - EHM with Victim Notification Technology (EHMVNT) - Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitoring (SCRAM) - Portable Alcohol Monitoring (PAM) - GPS Tracking o CrRLJ 3.2 governs factors to be considered by a Court when an accused person is released from custody while a case is pending. o If released, the Court may impose conditions that a defendant must follow, including pretrial monitoring o Devices for pretrial monitoring are not operated by the Court, but by private agencies o Reimbursement from the State for indigent defendants on EHM-VNT through Tiffany Hill Act 0 2019 Pretrial Reform Task Force Report repeatedly reiterated that costs for pretrial services should not fall to the defendant o Reduce jail costs Councilmember Paine was fascinated the court was processing so many passports. She observed the revenue was nice, but it was not enough to pay for another clerk. She asked about the fee that comes back to the court for processing passports. Ms. Maylor answered the court charges $35/passport that is retained by the court. Year-to-date revenues from passport processing are $41,321. The $35/passport is currently receipted to the City; one of the court's decision packages is funds to pay for the postage and printing. The $35 fee is set by statute. Councilmember Paine asked if that was state or federal statute. Ms. Maylor said she was uncertain. Councilmember Olson observed even though there has been a higher volume in passport processing, those funds do not go to the General Fund, it stays with the court. Ms. Maylor answered when she writes a check to the City every month, the funds generated by passport processing are included in that remittance. The court collects $35/passport and at the end of the month, she sends a check to the City's finance department which she assumed was deposited into the General Fund. Councilmember Olson observed the court's decision package was asking for funds for postage. Ms. Maylor agreed. Councilmember Olson observed the court was advertising for staff. She recalled there had been a court reorganization and due to the City's lean budget for 2024, she requested the court look at their organization Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 26 Packet Pg. 38 7.2.a to see if they could do without any positions. If that was a possibility, she requested the court staff communicate with the mayor and finance director. Councilmember Olson observed the absence of a domestic violence coordinator had been an issue for the judicial system. She invited the court to tell the council and the public the good news about that. Judge Rivera explained the domestic violence coordinator is part of the Edmonds Police Department. It was her understanding that position has been filled. The prosecuting attorney's office has to make contact with alleged victims immediately; when someone is arrested on a domestic violence offense, there is a mandatory booking, they have to be placed into custody and there has to be a hearing on the next possible judicial court date. Having as much information from that person presented at the first appearance is vitally important. Without a domestic violence coordinator, that information is often not available. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the court had a $405,000 decrease from the 2023 estimate to the 2024 budget. Ms. Maylor answered that $400,000 decrease was the result of an accounting error. Councilmember Nand asked about the status of human services provided at community court and whether funding via the Blake grants had been affected by state policy such that the City would need to supplement it in the 2025 budget. Judge Rivera answered in the 2023 legislative session as part of SB 5536, the bill related to possession of a controlled substance, there was money for therapeutic courts. The Edmonds Municipal Court received funding for the 2023-2024 biennium in the amount of $133,000. The court is using that money to support community court staffing and direct services. Also as part of that legislation the court is seeing possession of a controlled substance cases come in; those people are also generally served by the community court where there are substance use disorder providers available in the event they choose the route the prosecutor comes up with. There is diversion language in SB 5536 that does not necessarily apply to the municipal court because they do not have recovery navigators as statutory defined but the attorneys have developed a similar program. Councilmember Nand commented it is very fast paced with the changes in policy from the state. She recalled the PSPHSP Committee discussed grant funding and she was curious about the status. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 10:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED (6-1) COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING NO. Councilmember Chen commented it is amazing how hard the court staff work and how many passports they process. He asked if this level of demand was temporary coming out of the pandemic and people have the freedom to travel, or if the demand would continue. Ms. Maylor answered she did not have a magic ball, but her educated guess would be the volume would continue. In 2019 the court generated $22,000 from passport processing. Some courts stopped processing passports due to a lack of staffing which may account for the influx of individuals coming to Edmonds for their passports rather than other courts. Edmonds also does not do appointments like some other courts. When Edmonds did appointments, fewer people applied. The walk-in service Monday -Friday attracts people to the Edmonds location. The Edmonds location is also beautiful, court staff is great, there are great food choices downtown, etc. She envisioned the demand for passports would continue to be strong, but if there was a decrease, she will inform council. Councilmember Chen commented Highway 99 is also very beautiful and he anticipated there would be some demand for passport processing. He asked if that service was offered at the office on Highway 99. Judge Rivera answered there is not a court clerk on Highway 99 to provide that service. That could be considered possibly one day/week. A certification process is required to process passports. Although it was an excellent idea to offer that service on Highway 99, she was unsure it would work logistically with other staffing needs. Councilmember Chen suggested possibly one day/week or even a four hours/week. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 27 Packet Pg. 39 7.2.a 4. REPEAL OF ORDINANCE 4079 HIGHWAY 99 PLANNED ORDINANCE SPONSORED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER OLSON, TO MOVE AGENDA ITEM 9.4 TO NEXT WEEK. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Nelson reminded of Perrinville Palooza on October 7 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. The event will include free pumpkins, food trucks, booths, inflatables and more. 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Teitzel advised he received notice yesterday that the mayor's budget address was online on YouTube. He watched the address and felt it was very well done and included some good ideas that he was excited to come to fruition in 2024. However, he was concerned with a comment Mayor Nelson made during the budget address with regard to the fire district contract and the fact that the cost had increased approximately $4 million over the past 2 years, "We brought this to the attention of the City Council, but a majority of them have refused to take action. Without Council action soon, we risk losing fire and emergency medical services to our community. It is my belief that you, the voters, should have a say on this critical lifesaving service." Councilmember Teitzel took exception to that comment and wanted to correct the record, explaining the council has taken action, approving a resolution to investigate options with South County Fire as well as looking at other options to provide excellent fire and EMS to citizens at the lowest possible cost. The council owes it to the voters to do the due diligence so they can tell voters they have looked at the numbers and present the best option available. The council is not there yet and is not ready to proceed to the RFA option even though the mayor may believe that is the best option. Council needs to do the work necessary to prove that that is in fact the best option before it goes to the voters. Councilmember Paine thanked everyone who commented tonight on the CIP/CFP and their priorities. She appreciated the priority on pedestrian safety and wanted to ensure the City has a robust pedestrian safety program. The proposed budget tripled the budget for traffic calming which she hoped could be used to enhance pedestrian safety. She expressed appreciation for the community talking about the need to address the climate crisis. It is essential and something the City and residents can work toward together. If Edmonds joins a lot of other small towns, they can have the impact of a large country, recalling someone had indicated the impact could be as large as France. Everyone can have impact and she looked forward to the discussion about the climate action manager position proposed in the budget. Councilmember Chen also appreciated public comment about the CIP/CFP. It is timely to receive the 2024 proposed budget at this time; the Finance Committee and some members of the public are alarmed that the General Fund is dipping into reserves. The reserve requirement was $8.9 million in 2023 and the projection for 2023 shows it decreasing to $6.6 million. There are challenges ahead and he looked forward to working with the finance team, the council and City staff to carefully manage the budget so the City will be financially sound heading into 2024 and beyond. Council President Tibbott referred to the budget schedule and assured that is the best guess of how the deliberations will happen, but it is not set in concrete and is moldable. The council will carefully work its way through the process and adopt a budget at least by December 31. He was confident the council can work diligently through the budget together. Councilmember Olson referred to the mayor's budget address, expressing concern that residents may be stressed by the assertion that the City risks losing fire and EMS to the community as a result of council Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 28 Packet Pg. 40 7.2.a inaction. Residents can rest assured that that is not the case; the City's contract with the RFA for fire and EMS expires 7 years from now in 2030. While there is a clause that allows either party to the contract to terminate with two years notice and while the City knows the RFA prefers Edmonds be a member of the RFA rather than providing service as a contracted city, neither Edmonds nor the RFA have issued a notice of termination. Importantly, even if the notice came today, it would put the RFA annexation decision into 2025 after the 2024 comprehensive plan update is complete and that important process has been given its due. Alternatively the RFA may allow Edmonds the grace to come to that process voluntarily in 2025 without using the 2 year notice lever. Either way, the City gets to deal with this complex issue in 2025, better timing than in 2024. What and when things come up in municipal life cannot always be controlled, but this is not one of the times. Edmonds has fire and EMS secured with the same wonderful team from the RFA for the next two years. Councilmember Buckshnis recalled negotiations on the fire contract took three years. She urged the council to be contentious and listen to citizens with regard to joining the RFA because it will be very expensive. Councilmember Buckshnis announced the Halloween Howl on Saturday at 11 a.m. at the dog park with costume judging at 1 p.m. She gave kudos to Windermere's Beers in the Barn that raised $22,000 for the food bank. The Empty Bowl fundraiser for the food bank was also very successful. With great sadness, Councilmember Buckshnis announced the passing of John Osterhaug. She expressed appreciation for everything he did for the Waterfront Center, commenting he was a great guy. She gave a shout out to his family and assured things will get better. Councilmember Nand commented some of the people she met at a political event this weekend were excited to know about the next opportunity to meet candidates. Candidate Conversations with city council and mayoral candidates at the Edmonds Center for the Arts on October 12, cosponsored by My Edmonds News and the ECA. When one looks at what's happening in politics at the national level, especially today, she complimented her colleagues on the council, mayor, staff and audience for modeling democracy the way it is supposed to be; there are diverse views and people may not always agree, but they give each other professional courtesy and grace. She has never seen her colleagues on council boo someone in the middle of a speech which happened today at the U.S. Congress. Although there may be some sharp elbows, the council maintains a level of professional decorum that is important for community members and citizens to see democracy in action. 12. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:14 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 3, 2023 Page 29 Packet Pg. 41 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Approval of Special Meeting Minutes October 10, 2023 Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Approval of Council Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda. Narrative Council meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: 20231010 Special Meeting Packet Pg. 42 7.3.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DRAFT MINUTES October 10, 2023 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Nelson, Mayor Neil Tibbott, Council President Vivian Olson, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Dave Teitzel, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER STAFF PRESENT Michelle Bennett, Police Chief Kim Dunscombe, Deputy Admin. Serv. Director Susan McLaughlin, Planning & Dev. Dir. Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk The Edmonds City Council special meeting was called to order by Mayor Nelson at 6:01 p.m. in the Brackett Meeting Room, 121 5ti' Avenue N, City Hall — 3' Floor, Edmonds, and virtually. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO MOVE ITEM 5.1, AUGUST 2023 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT, TO COUNCIL BUSINESS ITEM 6.3. Councilmember Olson asked if action was allowed at a special meeting. Council President Tibbott advised there would not be any action, only discussion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Jim Ogonowski, Edmonds, agreed with moving the August 2023 Monthly Financial Report to the agenda for discussion. As the council discusses the report, they will see the financial situation emerging for the City, confirmed by the 2024 budget, which indicates the City is headed toward declaring a fiscal emergency due to being under the fund balance policy requirements. He encouraged the council to include that in their discussion and take it seriously. Projections show the need to use emergency funds Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 1 Packet Pg. 43 7.3.a and the council is required to authorize the expenditure of emergency funds for General Fund expenditures. Clara [last name inaudible], spoke in favor of funding a climate action manager in the budget who could focus their work on the climate and ensure people are not cutting down a lot of trees in Edmonds. She was advocating for the climate on behalf of her grandchildren and everyone's children and grandchildren. She became concerned after reading, "This Changes Everything" by Naomi Klein. One of the actions she took in 2016 was sleeping on the train tracks on Highway 20 to block trains to two Washington refineries. The City needs a full-time climate action manager who is not distracted by anything else but climate change and retaining trees which help reduce carbon. 5. RECEIVED FOR FILING 6. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. REPEAL OF ORDINANCE 4079 HIGHWAY 99 PLANNED ACTION Councilmember Buckshnis commented she has been working on this very complex topic for over a month, spending approximately 150 hours on it. She expressed appreciation for all the citizens who corresponded with her and other councilmembers. In 2017, three ordinances were developed, Ordinance 4077 put the Highway 99 subplan into the comprehensive plan, Ordinance 4078 changed the zoning for nine business and residential zones to CG, and Ordinance 4079 created a Planned Action Ordinance. The council had never seen a Planned Action Ordinance before. The Planned Action Ordinance required an environmental impact statement (EIS) which covered the subarea. The EIS is very informative and includes projections for housing, zoning, employment, traffic, land use etc. and the City was also to provide an ordinance that captured everything that needed to be done so the planned action could move forward and developers did not have to meet SEPA requirements. She noted SEPA requires large developments to do an EIS. The Planned Action Ordinance streamlined that process. Councilmember Buckshnis continued, in July 2022 then Planning Manager Kernen Lien put the 5-year review on the agenda under Received for Filing and the council requested a full presentation. A full presentation was provided to council in October and council requested a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) to update what had occurred since 2017. Many things have happened since 2017 including multimodal transportation, the pandemic, new stormwater code, multifamily design standards that had not been done, a housing commission provided new ideas for zoning, etc. The council voted 4-3 to have an SEIS completed. In 2023, the administration decided do a citywide EIS and move the SEIS for the subarea to 2025. Councilmember Buckshnis continued, this repeal will require developers to go through the SEPA process, like developers in other areas of the City do, instead of the streamlined process as part of the Planned Action Ordinance. Another reason is the environment today is completely different than it was in 2017. Attachment 5 to the agenda, Reasons to Repeal Ordinance #4079, includes a detailed list of issues including that the critical area aquifer code that has yet to be developed which will be instrumental for some large projects, and an emergency ordinance that was required for stepbacks because sufficient design standards were not provided. Councilmember Buckshnis requested councilmembers support the repeal of Ordinance 4079 to reassure residents of the Highway 99 area that developments will do the normal EIS procedure. When the citywide EIS is complete, a future council can decide whether to bring back the Planned Action Ordinance. Councilmember Olson thanked Councilmember Buckshnis for the extraordinary amount of time and research she has done on this subject, simplifying the original documentation to help the council Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 2 Packet Pg. 44 7.3.a understand this complex topic. There was a lot to absorb about what was done and why and what has changed and what the council may want to do going forward. She referred to Councilmember Buckshnis' comments that an SEIS for the subarea would be done after the citywide EIS. She recalled the citywide EIS would be sufficient as it would include extra emphasis on the Highway 99 subarea. That remains to be seen and the council can decide whether or not to do an SEIS at that point. The points made in the agenda memo were super relevant to her regarding changes such as the critical aquifer recharge area (CARA). She summarized this was the right move at this point in time. Councilmember Teitzel agreed there have been a lot of changes since 2017 when the council initially considered the Planned Action Ordinance including the housing density bills that the legislature passed this year such as HB I I10. Ordinance 4079 includes a goal to add 3,325 residential dwellings in the subarea. With the density bills, there will be more distribution of that density throughout the City, a critical issue that needs to be considered. That number is also likely not the correct number, but determining the correct number will take some analysis. He agreed there had been a sea of change since 2017 and it was time to repeal Ordinance 4079 and start over. The subarea plan has three legs, Ordinances 4077, 4078 and 4079 and he asked if repealing Ordinance 4079 would completely obviate the subarea plan. City Attorney Jeff Taraday responded Ordinances 4077 and 4078 remain in effect even if Ordinance 4079 is repealed; they stand independently. Councilmember Paine asked about the impacts of repealing Ordinance 4079. She referred to the impacts identified in documents provided by staff. She asked if there were projects in the hopper, noting there are 14 months until the comprehensive plan is completed. She asked how that will all merge together if Ordinance 4079 is repealed. Ms. McLaughlin responded that is a robust question. She acknowledged this is a complex issue with multiple documents, all within a fairly recent planning timeframe. Although some would not say 2017 is recent, it is a recent from a planning standpoint; developers rely on codes and policies to guide multi -million dollar projects. With regard to how it will change, she referred to staff s memo which was informed by the environmental consultant, Herrera, who is working on the comprehensive plan. One of the benefits of a planned action is certainty for developers with the environmental analysis already done. That also provides a cumulative analysis for the City to understand impacts that will happen with development if it occurs at the magnitude that was envisioned over time so the City can anticipate impacts. For example stepbacks were brought up, the environmental document thoroughly analyzed stepbacks in DEIS and the FEIS. At an individual project level it was not deemed to be a significant impact and that would not be mitigated regardless of whether the Planned Action Ordinance is repealed or retained. Even on a cumulative scale private developments were considered for impacts and not a lot of impacts were identified for mitigation as seen in the FEIS. Ms. Laughlin continued, if the Planned Action Ordinance is repealed, projects would do individual environmental analysis, but from Herrera's perspective and in her own experience, it would be very unlikely that an individual project would trigger an EIS. Individual projects would do a SEPA checklist and given the thresholds, it is unlikely there would be significant impacts. The benefit of a cumulative analysis was to have some certainty of the environmental impacts that were anticipated. There have been changes since 2017, but the only changes relevant to this discussion would be significant adverse impacts that were not anticipated. For example, by passing the CARA ordinance, the City is decreasing the environmental impacts associated with private development. That would not trigger an SEIS, it negates the need for an SEIS. Ms. McLaughlin continued, a lot of things have been done and some have not yet been completed like the multimodal level of service. If the Planned Action Ordinance is repealed today, there isn't a multimodal level of service in place so traffic impacts would be analyzed on an individual project level based on level of service and if anything is mitigated, it would be developers making capacity improvements. She wants to dig into the analysis and understand what is deficient in the subarea plan and the corresponding Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 3 Packet Pg. 45 7.3.a environmental document, listen to community members, understand the problems and have the environmental team as part of the comprehensive plan analyze it to determine what is the best vehicle moving forward, whether it is to mitigate for the comprehensive plan EIS or some level of supplementary EIS. Without getting into the analysis and explicitly understanding the problems, the risk is abandoning Ordinance 4079 prematurely and not having any level of cumulative analysis. Councilmember Paine asked if there was any development in the pipeline in the Highway 99 subarea. Ms. McLaughlin answered there is nothing formally in the pipeline; there is one in the pre -development stage. Councilmember Chen asked if this was a repeal and replace or just a repeal. If it is just a repeal, he asked what standards would be used for an individual project. Ms. McLaughlin answered even under the planned action, each project is required to do a SEPA checklist. If their impacts exceed what was anticipated in the planned action, mitigation would be required. If the Planned Action Ordinance is repealed, the environmental document that looks at cumulative impacts is no longer applicable which removes certainty for developers related to environmental impacts. Councilmember Chen appreciated the hours that Councilmember Buckshnis spent on the repeal in an attempt to get rid of something that is not as relevant today as it was in 2017. However, if applications are submitted for individual developments, they do not know what to expect and the individual building review is dependent on staff s professional judgment. He asked Councilmember Buckshnis to explain how individual development review would be handled if the Planned Action Ordinance is repealed. Councilmember Buckshnis disagreed with Ms. McLaughlin, commenting when completing a SEPA checklist, if something goes out of line, it triggers an EIS. For example, the Funtasia site, which consists of four warehouses, eight buildings and a critical area, will definitely require an EIS. A developer completes a SEPA checklist and if the SEPA Responsible Official feels it needs further investigation, it will happen. This is something developers in all cities have to do. The Planned Action Ordinance was unique and in today's world, environmentalist do not recommend Planned Action Ordinances because the environment is changing so much as well as changes due to HB 1110 that will result in more housing in the subarea. The comprehensive plan EIS covers the entire City and does not concentrate on a particular subarea. With the repeal of the Planned Action Ordinance, developers would revert to doing what all developers do today, a SEPA checklist which can trigger mitigation or an EIS. Councilmember Buckshnis continued, staff mentioned certainty for developers; she asked about certainty for citizens. The City needs to get the code updated with design standards, the CARA needs to be updated, and a multimodal level of service for traffic impact fees needs to be developed. As those things are updated and once the citywide EIS is completed, the council can again consider replacing the Planned Action Ordinance. The EIS has one preferred method, residential only, and does not have residential and mixed use. A variety of things have changed since 2017 that affect the Planned Action Ordinance. She summarized the council needs to respect what citizens have asked for and the best way to do that is to repeal the Planned Action Ordinance and return to the process required for other development in the City. Councilmember Chen asked in terms of timing, whether it would hurt or help to wait until the citywide EIS is done before repealing the Planned Action Ordinance so there is something in place. Ms. McLaughlin answered staffs recommendation and what council has taken action on is to roll the concerns of the SEIS into the comprehensive plan analysis and EIS for time efficiency, to understand the relevance, to determine if anything is missing and then determine whether the Planned Action Ordinance needs to be repealed. She did not have a strong problem statement, there wasn't anything to take the place of the Planned Action Ordinance, and there have not been significant changes. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 4 Packet Pg. 46 7.3.a Councilmember Nand referred to packet page 44, the first page of Ordinance 4079 and two Whereas clauses that are instrumental in looking at the push back and dismay from the community affected by the Planned Action Ordinance: "WHEREAS, designation of a Planned Action expedites the permitting process for subsequent, implementing projects whose impacts have been previously addressed in a Planned Action environmental impact statement (EIS), and thereby encourages desired growth and economic development; and" and "WHEREAS, the Highway 99 Planned Action EIS identifies impacts and mitigation measures associated with planned development in the subarea; and." She found it concerning that development has proceeded without the Highway 99 Planned Action EIS which was supposed to identify mitigating factors that the community needs to absorb this increased density and development. There is always concern about the aesthetic impact of new development in the Edmonds bowl; but the lack of a Planned Action EIS means development in the Highway 99 area has been allowed without identifying impacts or mitigation measures to allow neighborhoods to absorb changes in a way that does not impact their property values or expectations when they first bought their property and moved their families and lives there. This is why the community has asked the council for emergency ordinances and mitigation measures. She hoped when Herrera completes the citywide EIS, appropriate mitigation measures can be incorporated into the Highway 99 community commensurate to what other areas of town experience when they are asked to accept new development. Ms. McLaughlin responded the built form and aesthetics are part of the subarea plan; the subarea plan sets the density allowances and the built form of structural elements, stepbacks, setbacks, etc. The EIS associated with the subarea plan already analyzed all those at the worst case scenario, the highest density in the City. If the goal is to change the subarea plan, there will be less mitigation. People want outcomes via environmental documents, but it is often not the vehicle to make aesthetic changes which are more appropriately done through a design review process. For example, stepbacks were thoroughly analyzed in the DEIS and were deemed unnecessary. It is a policy choice by the council and those objective standards can be included in a development code that is administered via the design review process. The EIS is not used for that because of restrictions regarding what can be deemed a significant impact. The development allowances in the permit process are contained in the subarea plan and that is exactly what will be considered in the comprehensive plan update. Councilmember Nand said the reason she highlighted those whereas clauses is because the Highway 99 community was told they would take the highest density, highest building heights and most impactful development in the City, but the security they were provided via Ordinance 4079 included a Planned Action EIS to ensure impacts and mitigation were accounted for, however, the Planned Action EIS never happened. Ms. McLaughlin responded the Planned Action EIS was completed and adopted and is in effect and the mitigation measures are being acted upon which was addressed in the 5-year review last year. Councilmember Nand asked why the council had to fight so hard with the VIA contract to get an EIS for Highway 99 and was told the citywide EIS would be sufficient. Ms. McLauglin recalled given the council's interest in an SEIS and given that some of the issues in the Highway 99 subarea were associated with land use and densities, staff recommended the SEIS be rolled into the comprehensive plan EIS so there would be a more robust, time efficient and cost effective analysis. Council President Tibbott recalled there was discussion about deficiencies in Ordinance 4079 related to development and development standards. He asked Mr. Taraday to speak to any deficiencies he was aware of that would lend credibility to repealing Ordinance 4079. Mr. Taraday responded he also wanted to offer a slightly different perspective on some of the discussion that has occurred. He recommended when hypothesizing about individual projects that the council be very careful not to make blanket statements about whether a project will or will not definitely generate an EIS. He was skeptical of both statements because the reality is until there is an application and SEPA checklist that is reviewed by the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 5 Packet Pg. 47 SEPA responsible official, there is no way to evaluate whether there is a significant adverse environmental impact which is the purpose of the SEPA checklist. Analysis that done at a macros level as part of Ordinance 4079 was a slightly different than what would be done at a project specific level. Both look for environmental impacts, but the ability to focus on the particularly environmental impacts of a specific project at a specific location in the context of that specific property could potentially yield a different analysis by the SEPA responsible official. He was skeptical that a SEPA checklist for a project would lead to a requirement for a full EIS, but there is a middle ground that has not been discussed, the possibility of a mitigated determination of non -significance (MDNS). In an MDNS, the SEPA official states a determination of significance on a project can be avoided if the project is mitigated and the project can be conditioned to provide mitigation. With Ordinance 4079 in place, in most instances there will not be an opportunity to do an MDNS because no SEPA threshold determination is made with Ordinance 4079 in place. Repealing Ordinance 4079 at least provides an opportunity to do an analysis and determine whether mitigation might be appropriate. There is no guarantee that additional mitigation will be required because it depends on the specific project, the magnitude of the project, the impacts the project has on the surrounding area, etc. As far as deficiencies, Mr. Taraday recognized hindsight is 20/20 and everyone can look back on the mitigation measures that were conceived of when Ordinance 4079 was drafted. As example, the mitigation document on packet page 58 summarizes mitigation that was contemplated by Ordinance 4079. In several instances in the packet, there is the phrase, "no additional mitigation measures are recommended." That is the ordinance's way of saying it will not mitigate. For example in the context of land use mitigation measures, the ordinance basically states the City will rely on its plans and development regulations and no additional mitigation measures are recommended for land use impacts. He emphasized he was not saying there definitely would be additional mitigation if Ordinance 4079 was repealed, it just means there would not be that sentence and the SEPA official would be asked to evaluate whether a particular project on a particular site in a particular context had significant environmental impacts. He could not definitively say there was a deficiency in the document because it depends on the impacts. If the analysis was not done, no deficiencies would be found because under Ordinance 4079, a project would be exempt from additional mitigation. Mr. Taraday explained there is version of this EIS, which may be what the next version looks like, that would provide a streamlined process under the Planned Action Ordinance, but in order to use the streamlined process, the impacts need to be mitigated by making a SEPA mitigation payment into a particular fund that systematically over time generates revenue to offset impacts from smaller projects. What Ms. McLaughlin says is absolute true, the smaller the project, the harder it is to mitigate them on a case -by -case basis because smaller projects may not have significant environmental impacts. He could not anticipate what the project sizes will be over the next year; whether there will be a 50 unit building or a 500 unit building, which are very different things. What he found missing in Ordinance 4079 was an opportunity for the City to collect a SEPA mitigation from a 50 unit building. Council President Tibbott relayed his understanding of Mr. Taraday's explanation that one of the advantage of a SEPA review would be the analysis would occur in the area of that property and if mitigation was required, there would be an opportunity to do it near the site. Mr. Taraday explained most of the time when a project level SEPA analysis was performed, the impacts that would be identified and potentially mitigated would be near the site. Council President Tibbott referred to staff's reference to a problem statement and scoping that would go into the work being done with the consultant. He asked when that was expected and how would that help to develop a problem statement. Ms. McLaughlin answered that work is underway. The consultants have reviewed all the documentation on this topic including input from community members; a stakeholder meeting has been initiated with Highway 99 residents, particularly those most involved in developing the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 6 Packet Pg. 48 7.3.a SEIS to ensure their concerns can be itemized and studied in the citywide comprehensive plan EIS. She agreed it was absolutely true more could be gleaned out of a planned action than was in the existing Planned Action Ordinance. The risk she anticipated was not understanding the problem to be solved and not having any tools in place to backfill. With the threshold determinations, she did not think it would not yield much. As Mr. Taraday mentioned, the City could establish a SEPA mitigation fund and could update the planned action with more relevant mitigation based on a cumulative analysis. Councilmember Olson clarified the SEPA checklist would apply regardless of whether Ordinance 4079 was repealed. The project size would need to be significant for it to prompt a requirement for an EIS. She has established by talking with people in the construction industry that builders and contractors are familiar with the SEPA process and streamlining it is a bonus. Repealing Ordinance 4079 provides a little extra environmental protection until the results of the citywide EIS for that subarea are known. She summarized repealing Ordinance 4079 was the right step to take at this time and the planned action ordinance could be revisited during and after the comprehensive plan process. Ms. McLaughlin said there has not been any input from the development community. It would be worthwhile to have some level of conversation with the development community to assist in understanding the implications. Councilmember Olson asked whether the letter to editor in the media would have generated input from them if it was an issue. Ms. McLaughlin explained if this was a staff project, staff would have engaged in stakeholder conversation to understand impacts on both sides. Due to challenges with development related to financing and construction costs, people in the industry are looking to reduce their margins. Development has cooled substantially; the intent of the Planned Action Ordinance was to help foster redevelopment on Highway 99. She recognized the council and the community's concerns, but also wanted to understand the implication on the development community, noting it was a balance. Councilmember Buckshnis said staff has not completed the mitigation in the FEIS as shown in Attachment 5. She has also talked to developers and done a full spectrum of research. The council needs to think about the citizens and the environment and realize that the comprehensive plan should be the guiding light with the citywide EIS. Developers already know about a SEPA checklists and MDNS. There are other things coming on board such as the need to include policies about displacing people. Edmonds is behind the curve on its code and the code should be updated so the planned action EIS in the future addresses things that are missing such as the stormwater code, displacement, environmental mitigation, updating the zoning map, a multimodal transportation LOS, providing an alternate 2 for the EIS, open space, utilities, etc. She summarized it was appropriate to repeal Ordinance 4079 now, get the comprehensive plan done and assure the Highway 99 community that development will not continue with the Planned Action Ordinance as the City has not done what was promised such as updating the code, multifamily design standards, traffic mitigation, etc. A future council can address the Planned Action Ordinance after the citywide EIS and comprehensive plan update has been completed. Councilmember Paine asked how a MDNS would apply to design standards in Ordinance 4078 and how that would be harmonized. Mr. Taraday answered the development code remains the development code; the development code is not rewritten through SEPA. It is very difficult to hypothesize about an individual project and its impacts without an application. Whatever is in the code remains the same with or without Ordinance 4079. If the code allows for discretion in certain areas and if an impact is identified by locating a particularly building in a particular place, such as a building that will cast a huge shadow on someone's backyard, if the code allows a case -by -case basis application on setback or building heights, possibly through the SEPA process, there could be an MDNS that conditioned the project in a particular way. He was not certain the code allowed that. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 7 Packet Pg. 49 7.3.a Councilmember Paine commented what if there is an impact on design, but design in addressed in a different section of the code and not addressed by an EIS. Mr. Taraday explained a developer is entitled to develop pursuant to the code in place at the time the building permit application comes in. That does not change with or without Ordinance 4079. The question is whether there are ways someone can build pursuant to that code in a way that is less impactful or whether development with a significant adverse impact could be mitigated. He wanted to be clear that by repealing Ordinance 4079 there would not be a big increase in mitigation yield to the City; that is probably not realistic. It does provide the opportunity to go through that process on a case -by -case basis and determine on a case -by -case basis whether there is an impact that can be mitigated. Ms. McLaughlin explained because the ordinances were prepared as a package, the subarea plan and corresponding development standards, many of the potential impacts in the DEIS were mitigated by the development standards such as setbacks and design standards to avoid significant impacts. Although the FEIS says there are no impacts, that is because code was written to mitigate them. Many of the assurances, mitigations and protections are contained in the code so significant impacts from private development may be less likely. Councilmember Chen observed one of the reason's Councilmember Buckshnis wanted to repeal Ordinance 4079 was the following monitoring and review process in Section 5A and B (packet page 50) was not followed: A. The City shall monitor the progress of development in the designated Planned Action Subarea to ensure that it is consistent with the assumptions of this ordinance and the Planned Action EIS regarding the type and amount of development and associated impacts, and with the mitigation measures and improvements planned for the Highway 99 Planned Action Area. B. This Planned Action Ordinance shall be reviewed no later than five years from its effective date... Councilmember Chen asked if the monitoring and review had occurred. Ms. McLaughlin answered yes, explaining that was what sparked the debate. In August 2022, Kernen Lien, the SEPA responsible official at that time, did a robust analysis and said development was well within the thresholds anticipated by the FEIS and consistent with the planned action. Councilmember Chen asked why there was interest in repealing a good ordinance that a lot of time, energy and resources had been invested to develop, the monitoring and review process had been followed, and there was nothing to replace it if it was repealed. Councilmember Olson recalled during that review the council was not comfortable with the changes that had occurred which was the reason for the 4-3 vote to do an SEIS. Ms. McLaughlin advised that was later. Councilmember Olson recalled it happened close to that, staff made the presentation and the council came back and approved doing the SEIS. Ms. McLaughlin recalled the review sparked the emergency ordinances related to a singular development of concern. Councilmember Olson said through the process of the council's review, there were things the council wanted to draw more attention to and be more proactive with the mitigation. Councilmember Chen pointed out that was on a single project. Councilmember Olson disagreed, it was what that project symbolized with regard to general concerns. Ms. McLaughlin explained as a result of the August 2022 review, an emergency ordinance was adopted with regard to stepbacks which took about six months of staff time. The SEIS did not come into play until later, and from a sequencing standpoint, it was detached from 5-year review. She acknowledged they were topically related. In response to Councilmember Chen's question, Councilmember Olson felt it was all related, the desire for more protections was the reason the council requested an SEIS for that area. That was not done and now the plans is to rely on the citywide comprehensive plan EIS and wait for the results to determine if Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 8 Packet Pg. 50 7.3.a the council is comfortable and no longer needs a separate SEIS and possibly reinstate the Planned Action Ordinance. Ms. McLaughlin said Herrera emphases that the SEPA responsible official makes the determination whether the thresholds of the planned action are being met based on their review and subsequently makes a determination whether an SEIS is necessary; it is not a council action. The council did take action and the process of analyzing the deficiencies is underway. Councilmember Nand said if Ordinance 4079 is repealed, she hoped the comprehensive plan update process, the citywide EIS and the update to the code would yield a more nuanced view of how to incorporate increased density. She recalled Councilmember Chen stating instead of allocating all the density and the affordable housing on Highway 99, through the citywide EIS it could be distributed throughout the City so there are more integrated neighborhoods from a socioeconomic perspective. In response to Councilmember Chen's question, Councilmember Buckshnis explained if Ordinance 4079 is repealed, the City will go back to what the development services department did prior to 2017 and there will be no change to the way developers develop. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO REPEAL ORDINANCE 4079. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL, BUCKSHNIS, OLSON AND NAND AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN AND PAINE VOTING NO. 2. YEAR IN REVIEW / DECISION PACKAGE PRESENTATION Planning & Development Planning & Development Director McLaughlin reviewed: • Who We Are o Planning & Development is a multidisciplinary team of professionals specialized in building, planning and code enforcement. ■ Building (8) ■ Planning (10) ■ Code Enforcement (1) ■ Administration (3) • Permitting Team o Building ■ Leif Bjorback, Building Official Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 9 Packet Pg. 51 7.3.a ■ Kristin Johns, Permitting Supervisor ■ Denise Nelson, Senior Permit Coordinator ■ Christina Barson, Senior Permit Coordinator ■ Les Krestel, Building Inspector ■ Eric Carter, Senior Combination Building Inspector ■ Vacant, Plans Examiner ■ Donovan Akau, Plans Examiner o Planning ■ Michelle Martin, Administrative Assistant ■ Planning Manager, (Vacant) ■ Michael Clugston, Senior Planner (Code) ■ Jeff Levy, Senior Planner (LTE) ■ Deb Powers, Urban Forest Planner ■ Navyusha Pentakota, Urban Design Planner ■ Amber Brokenshire, Associate Planner ■ Tristan Sewell, Planner ■ Rose Haas, Planner o Additional Permit Review ■ Fire Safety - Eric Dyer, Deputy Fire Marshal ■ Engineering - Rob English, City Engineer - Emiko Rodarte, Administrative Assistant - Jennifer Machuga, Engineering Permit Coordinator - Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer - Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Engineering Program Manager - Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager - Jennifer Lambert, Engineering Technician - JoAnne Zulauf, Engineering Technician - Natalie Griggs, Engineering Technician What We Do o Planning & Development's mission is to preserve and enhance our community's environment and quality of life o We take pride in ■ Providing accurate, consistent, and timely permit processing ■ Improving and extending public infrastructure ■ Promoting building safety and managed land use ■ Implementing adopted City codes, policies, plans, and standards ■ Protecting the public's health and safety ■ Providing excellent customer service 2024 department goals o Efficient and accessible customer service o Operationalizing equity o Building resilience 2023 Development Review Snapshot o Park Impact Fees collected in 2022 (through October 31): $337,721.35 o Park impact Fees collected in 2023 (through September 30: $54,287 o Projected total of issued building permit for 2022: 1788 o Projec3ed total of issued building permits in 2023: 1674 o Building permit fees + Plan Review Fees = $985k projected revenue in 2023 o Staff time spent on permitting Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 10 Packet Pg. 52 7.3.a ■ Permitting Other 17% 37% 78% BUILDING PLANNING ADMIN • 2023 Key Planning Projects o Street Tree Plan ■ Status: consultant contract complete ■ Adoption in Q 12024 o Climate Action Plan ■ Status: Adopted o Highway 99 Community Renewal ■ Status: Consultant contract complete ■ Adoption anticipated in 2024 o Comprehensive plan ■ Status: work underway ■ Adoption in 2024 o Climate Champions Series ■ Status: In progress ■ Kickoff event held in Q2 2023 o Rooftop Solar Program ■ Status: In progress ■ Award grant in Q4 2023 o Tree Code amendments ■ Status: In progress o Reimaging Neighborhoods/Streets ■ Status: In progress ■ Adoption of legislation Q1 2024 o Code modernization ■ Status: in progress o Green Building Incentives ■ Status: In progress ■ Adoption anticipated Q 12024 o Building Code Updates ■ Status: In progress ■ Adoption anticipated Q4 2023 Councilmember Paine recalled Ms. McLaughlin mentioning a few weeks ago that as part of the comprehensive plan the consultant would synchronize what was mandated by the state and identify deficiencies and where the code needed to be updated. She asked if that was still accurate. Ms. McLaughlin answered the comprehensive plan is iterative with the development code, looking at those deficiencies and adding new policy that would direct the code update. Councilmember Paine clarified she was specifically asking about HB 1110. Ms. McLaughlin said that is being studied as part of the comprehensive plan. The City is waiting for guidance from the state; the consultant is moving forward with the guidance provided to date and will continue to adapt their approach as information is provided by the Department of Commerce. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 11 Packet Pg. 53 7.3.a Ms. McLaughlin continued her presentation: o Fagade Improvement program ■ Status: In progress ■ Grant awards anticipated Q4 2023 • 2024 Decision Packages o Climate Action Plan Manager - $149,623 ■ Description: To provide senior level expertise in climate change and corresponding action pursuant to the CAP; to coordinate climate action efforts across multiple city departments and to work collaboratively with community groups, schools, businesses and other stakeholders. o Boards & Commission Support - $10,000 ■ Description: To create one line item for Boards & Commissions to improve equitable distribution and to move the HPC fund to the General Fund; all budget commitments such as the HPC calendar will still be delivered while enabling flexibility for any saved funding to be distributed amongst the boards and commissions, as needed and as funding allows Councilmember Nand asked at what point will the City designate which area gets the alternative requirements for the 25% protection from HB 1110 for matters such as displacement, lack of infrastructure capacity, critical areas, etc., and if that would be part of the comprehensive plan. Ms. McLaughlin answered the density distribution and how the City meets its housing targets will be considered, taking HB 1110into account, as part of the comprehensive plan analysis and will include looking at growth alternatives throughout the City and balancing density distribution. Councilmember Nand asked if the criteria the City considered would be primarily environmentally or racially disparate and displacement impacts. Ms. McLaughlin answered displacement is a critical element that is required by the state in this comprehensive plan update and will definitely be analyzed. Councilmember Nand asked if the 25% would be contiguous or in separate neighborhoods. Ms. McLaughlin answered that had not been determined yet. Councilmember Nand asked at what point in the process should council check in with regard to that. Ms. McLaughlin answered the neighborhood level conversations around growth alternatives are just beginning. First will be existing conditions in November and December followed by conversations at the neighborhood level regarding growth alternatives which includes discussion about appropriate levels of density. Councilmember Nand anticipated the consultant would need to do a certain level of data gathering to justify their choices. She wanted to ensure data was provided in real time with regard to community impacts. She recognized Planning & Development had a process to reach out to stakeholders; councilmembers also heard from the community and she wanted to ensure those voices were included in the process. Councilmember Teitzel recalled staff mentioning the fagade improvement program was very complex to administer. Council set aside $300,000 in ARPA funds for that program in 2023, but no grant requests had been submitted and there were plans to discontinue the program.. Ms. McLaughlin responded no grant requests were received because the program hadn't been developed. Given council's decision to retain funding and to pursue that program, a term limited position was hired to work on a myriad things including developing criteria for that program and publicizing it. Councilmember Teitzel summarized his understanding no grant requests had been received, but they were expected in the fourth quarter of 2023. Ms. McLaughlin agreed. Council President Tibbott asked what a climate action plan manager's day-to-day responsibilities would be and what the impact of moving the hiring of that position to another budget year would be. Ms. McLaughlin said she could not emphasis enough how many community members have expressed frustration at the lack of progress and wanting a presence in the community related to personal actions Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 12 Packet Pg. 54 7.3.a they can take and what resources are available. She anticipated the climate action plan manager would be an expert in community engagement as well in climate change generally, a well-spoken professional who has been in the field. Planning & Development is responsible for carrying out the actions of the CAP and has largely been tackling the ones that the department has direct influence over such as things they can legislate. For example, Planning & Development has worked with the facilities team in making changes such as the solar array. Ninety-eight percent of emissions are the result of personal behavior; Planning & Development absolutely does not have the capacity to work with the energized, engaged and dedicated community members to encourage that 98% to make changes. That is the opportunity she sees with a climate action plan manager. Many other cities have a staff person dedicated to climate change and corresponding behavior. Council President Tibbott asked if the position would be 50% education and 50% administration. Ms. McLaughlin answered that would be a fair statement; she envisioned education would include interactive tools like a dashboard, access to recourses, information on making personal changes, etc. Councilmember Olson requested the presentation be sent to the council. On behalf of residents and contractors, she thanked Planning & Development for their longer hours for permits. She asked whether ADU regulations could be developed sooner rather than later, anticipating there was pent-up demand. She asked the impact ADUs would have on park impact fees. Ms. McLaughlin answered she did not believe detached ADU would not pay park impact fees because they were not large enough. Councilmember Olson expressed interest in having a conversation with staff about moving that forward and possibly having residents assist with developing code so that it could be implemented to address the pent-up demand. Ms. McLaughlin answered staff is working on that. The new term limited person who has a background in architecture and a planner has a background in urban design are working with the code modernization team to develop draft policy. Councilmember Olson asked for the names of those staff members. Ms. McLaughlin answered the Jeff Levy is the term limited senior planner, Navyusha Pentakota is the urban design planner and Rose Haas is the planner working on the code modernization. Councilmember Olson asked for a point of contact for the VIA contract for councilmembers and the public to submit information. For example, she wanted to submit a questionnaire done by Marysville regarding how residents would like to see density integrated. Ms. McLaughlin said that could be submitted through her; she wanted to be cognizant about the time the consultant is expending to ensure they stay on budget and on task. Councilmember Olson asked when the next code update packet would be provided to council. Ms. McLaughlin answered November. With regard to the climate action plan manager, Councilmember Olson said she took a class on C-PACER, a very cool financing tool for large sustainability upgrades. No one is getting the word on that program; she could see the value of someone who is aware of programs, teaching people about programs, etc., but looking at the budget she was hesitant to add an FTE. If this FTE was prioritized, she asked what could be cut to fund it. Nick Maxwell also informed her about a $500,000 Commerce grant available to the City Edmonds. She asked if there would be an option to apply for that grant and use it to fund the climate action plan manager. Ms. McLaughlin said that would require a term limited position. Councilmember Olson commented it may not need to be term limited as the funds would get through the short term when she did not envision adding staff. Mayor Nelson advised this level of detail was not appropriate for a decision package presentation. Councilmember Olson asked about the decision package related to board and commission support. Ms. McLaughlin answered there have been inconsistent budgets and inequitable access to resources for boards and commissions. Some have a dedicated fund, some request budget annually, and some have no budget at all. While still being mindful of the HPC's calendar which likely can be prepared inhouse, resources Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 13 Packet Pg. 55 will be made available to all boards and commissions. Councilmember Olson recalled when she was on the tree board, they took their own minutes, but a lot of boards and commission have their minutes done professionally which is an additional expense. She asked if that was an area where funding could be reduced. Ms. McLaughlin answered it is helpful to have a minute taker, it is not that expensive and it comes from Planning & Development's professional services budget, not the boards and commission budget. Having consistent minutes and someone dedicated to that task who is not distracted by the conversation or who may have a bias is important to ensure the record is clear and objective. With regard to the climate action plan manager, Councilmember Paine explained a lot of the work the climate protection committee would like to see is access to resources, basically a concierge to inform the community and businesses about opportunities for rebates. She often provides that information to people who contact her and she hoped that was something that position could provide. She asked how many grants staff could bring in with a climate action plan manager and grants manager. Councilmember Chen observed the FTE list had included an environmental programs manager for four years and now there is a decision package to hire a climate action plan manager. He asked if those positions had a similar function, commenting the environmental program manager may have accumulated knowledge. Ms. McLaughlin answered although they sound similar, the environmental program manager addressed critical areas and critical area -related legislation like the shoreline management plan (SMP), the urban forest management plan (UFMP), SEPA determinations, etc. That knowledge is now integrated in all planners. For example, Mike Clugston has taken on that role related to code modernization. When a code like the SMP needs to be updated, Mike Clugston is very adept at that code amendment work. The environmental programs manager deals more with code and or GMA requirements. The climate action plan manager is focused on the implications of climate change, holding the City accountable to the CAP and working with community members, organizations and businesses about making changes. Councilmember Chen said if there was interest in funding the climate action plan manager but there needed to be a tradeoff such as cutting 10% of the Planning & Development department's budget, where did she see opportunity for a 10% cut. Ms. McLaughlin answered Planning & Development is a lean department that does a lot with a little and could not manage a 10% cut. She anticipated a position like a climate action plan manager could seek grants that would pay for their position. Councilmember Nand agreed a climate action plan manager would be wonderful. However, Edmonds is a relatively small city and there are a number of similarly situated small cities in the region that might also be interested in community outreach especially related to education. She became a vegan and purchased an EV in 2013 because she was passionate about it, but it is mystifying for a lot of people. The more people that can be reached regionally, the more impact there can be on limiting GHGs. She asked if it would be possible to share a climate action plan manager with other cities, recalling the City shared a social worker with Lynnwood. She anticipated a shared climate action plan manager could broaden the impact and share the budgetary impacts. Ms. McLaughlin answered the CAP is ambitious and there is a lot of work to do in Edmonds without looking beyond its borders. Behavior changes relate regionally, but the CAP requires actions from each department which requires a lot of coordination, accountability, tracking and monitoring. Many local jurisdictions such as Shoreline have a climate action plan manager. Edmonds having its own climate action plan manager would allow the City to better collaborate regionally. She did not envision sharing a person at 25% would work. Councilmember Nand said the desired behavioral changes in the private sector, citizens and government are very similar between cities. Instead of having 4-5 people doing the same work, one person could disseminate the information. The same is true for a grants manager. She asked if it would be possible to Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 14 Packet Pg. 56 7.3.a redesign the climate action plan manager to be a more junior role in the N-28 or N-29 range. A salary of $150,000 will result in people advanced in their career competing for the position. As a young graduate in this region, it is difficult to find an entry level position. Creating those opportunities would be beneficial for the community or people who may not have considered government as a viable career option and could ease the budgetary pressure in 2024. Ms. McLaughlin answered the level of behavioral change in departments necessary to meet the climate neutral goal by 2050 requires a level of seniority to tell people what to do; a junior position would not have the same level of expertise or seniority. When departments are held accountable, it is important that the position be a senior level with some experience. Councilmember Nand responded giving the opportunity, a younger person could develop those leadership skills. Ms. McLauglin advised more associate level planners are being hired to provide upward level mobility. Councilmember Buckshnis said some of those things can be done locally or through the mayor's climate protection committee by brushing off Taming Bigfoot. It would not have to be competitive but it is a good way to train people on measuring their carbon footprint and ways to reduce it. She was not in favor of hiring an FTE and pointed out a complete CAP must have adaptation measures and implementation measures and Edmonds' CAP is GHG centric. She would like to have the mayor's climate protection committee and the planning board work on the CAP. The City can apply for the $500,000 Department of Commerce grant in June -July next year. She was interested in doing something with local groups that already exist such as the Interfaith Climate Action Group, the Mayor's Climate Protection Committee, etc. People had a good time with Taming Bigfoot; something like that could be done in the interim until the City can apply for the grant next year. Times are tight and the council needs to be conscious of the budget. She advised there were some number inconsistencies in the 2024 budget that she will bring up with Administrative Services Director Dave Turley. Police Department Police Chief Michelle Bennett reviewed: 2022-2023 Accomplishments o Recruiting and Hiring ■ Implemented three mid -level managers/commanders ■ Administrative staff assistant for commanders and assistant chiefs ■ Hired 16 staff: 10 officers, 6 civilians ■ Reinstated problem solving emphasis team personnel ■ Added a new patrol district ■ Hired back a domestic violence coordinator ■ Fully instituted body camera and added two public disclosure body camera employees ■ Hired back parking enforcement officer ■ Hired a crime analyst o Edmonds Police Department Personnel demographics ■ Sworn Officers - Male: 38 - Female: 14 - Department diversity: 14 ■ All positions - Male:39 - Female: 25 o Selected new K9 and officers o Purchased 18 patrol vehicles in process of outfitting o Strategic Plan: completion 12/23 o Department recruiting video, launched in September 2023 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 15 Packet Pg. 57 o Gov QA online pay portal for public disclosure records scheduled for launch in November 2023 o AEDs launched in patrol cars o Blue Team/IA Pro launch o Successful ACCESS Audit o Bike Patrol ■ This unit played a critical role in assisting with various public events, including the 4t1i of July Parade and the patrolling of civic events and parks, showcasing their adaptability and commitment to community safety Community engagement program o Community service vehicle donated by Lynnwood Honda o Community Academy ■ An interactive program designed to bridge the gap between the police and the public ■ Classes include patrol procedures, investigations, and community policing ■ Participants had the opportunity to engage in hands-on activities, interact with officers, and gain a deeper understanding of the challenges and responsibilities faced by law enforcement ■ Feedback from attendees was overwhelmingly positive, with many expressing newfound appreciation and trust in the Edmonds Police Department o Community Events ■ National Night Out - Event was a great success with an increase in participants compared to previous years, reinforcing the sense of unity and collaboration within the community ■ Sherwood Elementary Crossing Guard Swearing In - In collaboration with Sherwood Elementary School, a special event was organized to celebrate and acknowledge the invaluable contributions of crossing guards who play a pivotal role in ensuring the safety of students. The swearing -in ceremony provided the Edmonds Police Department with a platform to highlight the significance of these often unsung heroes in the community ■ Meadowdale Preschool Visit - Visit to preschool aimed to promote positive police interactions from an early age. Officers engaged with young children, introducing them to law enforcement in a friendly and approachable manner ■ Shop with a Cop - Heartwarming event that allows children to go on a shopping spree with police officers ■ Food Drive - Annual food drive, organized by the Edmonds Police Department, brought together community members, local businesses and officers to collect essential supplies for those in need ■ Paying for motel rooms for people experiencing homelessness (using funds in the police budget and funds donated by a local church) ■ Coffee with a Cop (3 in 2023) - Informal gathering designed to facilitate open dialogue between our dedicated police staff and the community members they serve and protect. This event is specifically organized for on -duty staff members who can participate without requiring overtime. Allows for open conversations, active listening, positive engagement and networking opportunity o Cadet Program, Explore Program in progress ■ In 2022 Edmonds Police Department relaunched its cadet program for actively enrolled college students Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 16 Packet Pg. 58 7.3.a - Introduction to varied careers related to public service and law enforcement - Opportunity to evaluate potential candidates for future employment in a full-time role - Enhances community police relations, creates opportunities for community members - Assists the police department with its dynamic workload ■ In the fall of 2022, we hired Cadet Jennifer Aguilar, a college student at Seattle University working toward her degree in criminal justice with a specialization in forensic psychology Additional Police Tools o Drone Unit ■ Introduction of the drone unit to Edmonds Police Department in 2022 has already been applied with success for not only our own agency but has been utilized to assist neighboring agencies that need aerial surveillance and crime scene documentation o K9 Welcomes: ■ Officer Ballard's K9 partner is a 1-year old male German Shepherd imported from Slovakia who has amazing energy and a clear head. ■ Officer Hwang selected a 16-month old male Dutch Shepherd who is long and athletic with great speed. His name is Dog. ■ Both teams will start K9 school on October 4 and should be road ready by mid -December [The following questions were asked while technology issues were being addressed.] Councilmember Teitzel inquired about K9 training, Chief Bennett advised the officers go through K9 training with the dogs and there is a great deal of field training. Councilmember Olson observed the funding for the AEDs was provided by the Edmonds Police Foundation. Councilmember Chen asked about police operations without any K9s. Chief Bennett explained unfortunately both of the department's K9s had unrecoverable illnesses. If there is a need, Edmonds will utilize a K9 from another agency. Chief Bennett continued her presentation: • Crime Rates o Crime Statistics - NIBRS Offenses 0 1 0 3 3 M6roYy1Mf 1 -10 0 1 0 0 0 k.pe 6 0l 0.1 3 1 soft" 2 0 0 0 0 sa IAs ..fOC1M _ 0 0 0 0 0 f0n 12 5 0. 3 0.1 5 2 61 0.016 LS 2) 131 160 0112 .) 102 a6162 0�A31JYk 65 0.196 1.5 22 JS9 ktlnpp6s0 k 0.31, 0.1 1 3 0 0 a 0 0 sut t 0 a o 0 0 O1f.— 0 0 0 0 0 _!At6g )Cl)Or01.0. 50 )3 o.s6 1.e 69 ss ko0b.v a3 32 0.256 0.) IS 2 B"0" 1)6 1)1 0.017 a X 6 mnyIMN W.— .2 661 -0012 20.5 — 6 Moor Velrle T6e11 101 103 U.C2 1A S 1 Anon 6 5 AW O.t 0 0 DesNuct .1—perty .36 6J5 -112 ]O.t 21 11 (wMerfekn(/fpgery 35 A 0.1)1 0.7 1 2 Hwb ONenxl .Mp 260O.t3l 6 23 2 ITb.ttMm.nr 2 01 0 0 0 6xtoncn/olKamd 5 1 J1.1 0.3 0 0 8r , 0 0 0 0 0 Stoll PMPWV Off— 61 56 OA62 L3 29 0 A-1 C—tv 2 2 0 0 1 0 _,Nersotc VObty Ill IN 0A62 3.9 IJ 0 Dny 30sgwn.nt V.iYtons 10. .1 012 3.7 0 0_V,04l.n,., 0 0 0 0 0 porno "P" 6 0 -1 0 1 0 prostwtan o3renles o 0 0 o a W..pon lJw vnWgnl N 26 C+ 0.) 1+ 0 OoM ioW 2Kk 2n7 0.0N $3.2 612 212 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 17 Packet Pg. 59 7.3.a Crime Statistics - NIBRS —'""""� e,a cnatlf: o 0 C�ffl'W /Viefdnty U U Weapons Used in Crimes Drxwdefly conduct 11 o ,` Drankenre Ss 0 0 % 700 DUI 64 0 150 r,m0y 011en," 0 0 t06 !b tlpuof taw 5q 0 II 6 IS Vobtens i 1 6 Oeep*VTom 0 0 f3'e tfcsa55 61 4 A All Oilier Offenses Y 0 art TOW 163 S ome.auts.c 0�ae•*�,lz n,ifaufatefL taz tz Me.�luwa, lt\ Str.fluflt� S6\ sm.*r a..aWn •o0w01.as Relationship of Victim to Offender wince f lm � :� FA+wM:. rrc m'e nfaru iMCf41f WASK'S Wnl ArMM Nfp01f fill nf'tlC.S af.4MlE du5or ..T Tf1t NTO'�rKUNt6%E04MOTK fanN : r, Slufr'lN61f51 4CTf6C/l Na tffoon 411 WA5K - Wmtw fw Aa llu & Sfof fts ero ro ce CMS Our I S 0 100 X0 i., &M we 600 • School zone cameras o Should be operational in January 2024 o There is a 30 day warning period o Five cameras were installed after a research study at high speed school zone areas o Red light cameras could simply be added to the existing contract • Decision package 7 o The proposed red-light camera enforcement systems (assuming approval ad agreement modification) will take several months into 2024 to engineer, install, and incorporate into the eco-system we are currently designing for school zone cameras ■ For 2024, they could be operational by May, so they would be functional for the remaining 8 months of the year ■ For 2025 and beyond, they would be operational year-round o Six red light cameras proposed at the highest volume intersection related accidents in the City ■ The City of Kirkland operates a school zone camera (not red light), program nearly identical to our proposed plan. Seattle, Kirkland, UP also operate cameras. Everett is in process of getting cameras. ■ A Lynnwood report is attached as an example - Lynnwood traffic camera infraction revenues are shown at $3.5M from the six new cameras - Lynnwood reports that over 80% of violators live outside the city limits o Lynnwood's 2022 Annual Automated Traffic Safety Camera Report Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 18 Packet Pg. 60 7.3.a X n Lynnwood Police Department Per RCW 46.63.170 cities using automated traffic safety cameras must post an annual report of the number of traffic accidents that occurred at each location where an automated traffic safety camera is located, as well as the number of notices of infraction issued for each camera on the City's website The below data comprises the number of accidents and citations issued at each respective intersection and school zone where traffic safety cameras are deployed. Intersection Number of Citations 'Number of Accidents 361h / 196th St S.W. 6,070 3 4411 / Aid. Mall Blvd. 3,514 8 (A) 441h / 1961h St S.W. 0 - Under Construction. 6 184111 I Ald. Mall Pkwy 4,728 6 19611 /Ald. Mall Pkwy 14,163 2 Maple / Ald. Mall Pkwy 1,900 3 1961" / Hwy 99 2,834 5 44'h / 20V St S.W. 5,063 8 (A) Hwy 991200" St S.W. 1,164 3 School Zone Number of Citations Number of Accidents 18200 -18800 BLK 44th Ave West 4,175 1 5500 - 6600 BLK 168th St S.W 2,660 4 'Number of Accidents reported reflect collisions occurring within the intersect on Highest Accident -related intersections in Edmonds ■ Highway 99 & 220th St SW ■ 220th St SW & 76f'' Ave W ■ 220th St SW & 9f'' Ave S ■ 212th St SW & 76th Ave W ■ Hwy 104 & Dayton St ■ Hwy 104 & 100` Ave W Edmonds accidents (2018-2023) 01 o` 0 0 o r�.t:�. o 00 ° 00 0 0 0 ' � O 00o0' 0 e 0_ 0, OO o 0 010 0 0 9 (� 0 Q0 e0e e 00 (G) 0"� 0 �� 0, e , taw"" L 0 0 a0 0_0 10 e e , e i Q0 000 00 . W. o"� e 0' .. 0 i � t e �,mrgsx r 1 00 O o o a ' r aM4� 0 0 0 �' Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 19 Packet Pg. 61 7.3.a o Highway 99 Red -Light Intersections Intersections with Highway 99 212th St SW 216th St SW 220th St SW 224th St SW 228"' St SW 238"' St SW 224th St SW Jurisdictional Direction SB and EB SB and EB SB, NB, EB and WB SB, NB, EB and WB SB, NB, EB and WB SB, NB, EB and WB SB and WB Councilmember Teitzel assumed staffing was required to review the red-light camera footage and send out citations; however, there did not appear to be any staff costs in the decision package. Chief Bennett answered additional staffing would be required eventually. It wasn't necessary to request it now because it will be at least six months before they would be operational and the warning period expired. There would be a budget amendment for additional staff once the cameras were operational. Councilmember Paine asked if the red-light ticket review could be done by officers on light duty. Chief Bennett answered potentially although the department has not had a lot of light duty in the past. Councilmember Paine asked what resources would be required to have more than six cameras, recognizing it would affected the courts as well as the police department. Chief Bennett answered depending on volume, additional staff would be required to review footage and the court may need additional staff to process tickets as well as possibly an additional day to process contested tickets which might also require more public disclosure requests. Councilmember Paine said if there is interest in six, maybe there should be nine. Councilmember Paine observed the prisoner care budget is high, almost $1M. She asked who controls that contract. Chief Bennett answered the police department does not administer that contract. Councilmember Paine expressed interest in determining who administers the contract and determining whether other jurisdictions offered lower cost post -conviction jail housing, recalling Yakima offered that at a lower cost. Chief Bennett answered some of those long distance housing facilities no longer offer services. Someone would need to research where those services are offered; the police department is not involved in that process. She noted the increased cost is also because jails have add on costs for mental health, addiction, suicide watch, etc. Councilmember Chen observed the police department head count on page 77 of the budget book was 83.5 in 2023 and 2024; on page 79, the 2023 estimate was $13M and the 2024 budget was $17.6M, an increase of $4.5M. He asked about the increased cost with the same head count. Chief Bennett answered she was not aware of how Mr. Turley calculated that increase. One factor may be the EPOA union contract that is in the process of being bargained. That would be a question for Mr. Turley. Councilmember Chen recalled the 2023 budget included funds for a Highway 99 substation search. He asked for an update on the search. Chief Bennett answered there is a study group that meets weekly and the search is ongoing. Mayor Nelson advised Public Works is taking lead on that. Councilmember Nand relayed she met a young community member interested in meeting police officers; she will share the community programs with her. She thanked the police department for their community outreach. Councilmember Nand was skeptical about expanding traffic cameras outside of school zones. She could see a nexus to public safety for the school zone cameras due to young pedestrians. Many people who travel through Lynnwood have relayed their negative perception of the red light cameras. She was Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 20 Packet Pg. 62 7.3.a concerned with red light cameras as a source of revenue estimated at $3.5M and the strong perception in the community that red light cameras are a revenue generating activity and less of a nexus to public safety. The reason Lynnwood has gotten away with a wide spread red light camera program is the attraction of Alderwood Mall. There is nothing comparable in Edmonds' business community and she feared people getting tickets would discourage tourism activity. Councilmember Nand was also concerned that four of the six identified intersections were targeted to the Highway 99 community, a community that gets very disparate treatment compared to other areas of the City. Chief Bennett responded only one of the high accident intersections is on Highway 99, the rest are not. Councilmember Nand commented the intersections may not be on Highway 99 but they are streets off Highway 99 which will disparately affect that community. For example if someone is commuting into the bowl or lives in north Edmonds, they would not be impacted by the cameras as much as someone living in the Highway 99 community. Chief Benett displayed the list of highest accident -related intersections, explaining the intersections were identified solely based on accident data and there have been a number of resident complaints, especially high speed accidents on 76t' and 212t' and 220t''. Chief Bennett continued, explaining for her, the red light cameras are a public safety measure for accident reduction as well as pedestrian safety. Generally people living in a community know where the red light cameras are and GPS apps warn of red light cameras. The goal is to get people to stop at red lights to allow pedestrians to cross safely as well as to reduce accidents. She referred to a video of an accident at 220t' & 76t' where a parent and child were hit. Red light cameras are a surefire way in high accident intersections to get people to slow down. She admitted receiving a red light ticket in Lynnwood and realizing after she watched the video that she had unintentionally run the red light. The ticket is like a parking ticket, is not a moving violation and does not impact a person's insurance or ability to have a driver's license. Many of the drivers who receive red light camera tickets in Lynnwood are not residents, most of the tickets are for people traversing through the community. She assured the red light cameras are a public safety measure and the data is strictly related to high accident intersections. Councilmember Nand said she was definitely in favor of reducing speeds on the streets off Highway 99 via community emphasis patrols and traffic calming such as speed bumps but she was not quite there with traffic cameras due to people's perception that Lynnwood is hostile to people traveling through. She knew of people who have gotten red light camera tickets who refuse to travel in Lynnwood. With regard to the comment that bowl residents would not be targeted by the proposed location of the red light cameras, Councilmember Olson said it is nearly impossible to reach the freeway without driving on 212th, 220th or SR 104. She asked if Shoreline had red light cameras. Chief Bennett explained Shoreline is a contract city for police services. She was uncertain if any of the contract cities have red light cameras because it is a complicated, multiagency, multigovernmental arrangement. Councilmember Olson said she was interested in the context of competition for people driving through. Councilmember Olson observed the budget forecast projects $4M from red light cameras. She asked if that amount was optimistic or should the amount be $2M-2.5M. She asked what that amount was based on. Chief Bennett said most of her conversations have been related to accidents, safety and the data. Anything related to revenue was on the very conservative, low end. Councilmember Olson asked if there was a community service option for someone who gets a red light camera ticket and cannot afford to pay. Chief Bennett advised there are options through the court. Councilmember Olson expressed interest in having a community service option. She congratulated the police department on passing their audit, the fact that only three departments in the state passed is very impressive. Chief Bennett recognized the department's amazing administrative staff. Councilmember Olson asked what the audit looks at. Chief Bennett offered to send it to council. Councilmember Olson Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 21 Packet Pg. 63 7.3.a also inquired about the recruiting video. Mayor Nelson advised the video is on the City's Facebook at City Police. Councilmember Teitzel referred to the slide about the bike program and their use for crowd control. He receives numerous emails about crime and drug use on the Interurban Trail and asked if random bike patrols on the trail had been considered to calm that type of activity. Chief Bennett responded there are jurisdictional issues because the trail and parks are not necessarily owned by the City of Edmonds. Councilmember Olson asked if a ILA would be required. Chief Bennett responded addressing that would require further discussion. In her previous position, the police department patrolled city -owned trails and parks especially in the summer, but the variety of ownership of the Interurban Trail makes that more difficult. Councilmember Teitzel asked if additional funding would be required for bike patrols on the Interurban Trail. Chief Bennett advised it likely would be overtime based on staffing. Current patrols are done with on -duty officers as much as possible, but current staffing makes that difficult. Councilmember Chen argued it is the City's responsibility because although the Interurban Trail is in Mountlake Terrace, the residences are in Edmonds. Chief Bennett relayed her support for as much patrol as humanly possible. If additional patrols are requested and approved, she was happy to put those resources on the Interurban Trail if the police department has the resources available. Mayor Nelson declared a brief recess. 3. AUGUST 2023 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT (Previously Received for Filing Item Council President Tibbott advised he asked the Finance Committee Chair, Councilmember Chen, to lead this discussion. To the question of why this was not done at the Finance Committee meeting, he explained there was interest by several councilmembers in the monthly financial report and this provides an opportunity for the entire council to hear the same information as the council proceeds into the budget season. Councilmember Chen explained typically Administrative Services Director Dave Turley reviews the monthly financial report with the Finance Committee followed by questions from councilmembers. He asked Deputy Administrative Service Director Kim Dunscombe if she would like to proceed in that manner. Ms. Dunscombe answered she has only been with the City for a month and was not entirely familiar with the reports and numbers. She will answer the questions she is able to but was not prepared to present the monthly report. Councilmember Chen said another format the Finance Committee utilizes is staff responds to questions. Councilmember Chen refer to the Investment Portfolio Summary, packet page 4, which summarizes the City's cash investments amounts. He referred to $10.6M invested in the Washington State LGIP generating a return of 5.34% and $33.7M invested in the Snohomish County LGIP generating a return of 2.31 %. Funds from both sources can be accessed on demand and based on prior discussions with Mr. Turley, the Snohomish County LGIP requires 1-2 weeks' notice to access the funds versus the Washington State LGIP which is almost instantaneous similar to a checking account. His observation for the last 6-7 months was the City is heavily invested in the lower performing investment pool, Snohomish County LGIP which has a 2.3% return. He has been asking for several months why the City does not invest more in the higher return investment which is also more liquid and easier to access. Ms. Dunscombe recalled Councilmember Chen asking that question at a previous Finance Committee meetings' she did not recall Mr. Turley's his answer but was certain he had a reason. Mayor Nelson expressed surprise at the questioning, relay concern he just learned that council planned to have the deputy director answer questions that the director would typically answer. The council knows Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 22 Packet Pg. 64 7.3.a Mr. Turley is out this week so he was unsure why the council was engaging in this type of discussion. Council President Tibbott said the intent was just to make the council aware of this question. The investment policy is something the council wants to review in the coming year to ensure the City is doing the best it can. In his mind, the more important issue was fund balances. Councilmember Chen agreed this was a special meeting and no actions were anticipated. The main focus is for the council to discuss this so the public is aware of the City's financial position as reported the August financial report. Councilmember Buckshnis raised a point of order, suggesting a special Finance Committee meeting next week when Mr. Turley is available to answer questions. The council president canceled the Finance Committee meeting and apparently this agenda item is trying to make up for that. She preferred to wait to have Mr. Turley answer questions instead of asking a new employee. Committee meetings are an informal place to hold discussions. Mayor Nelson agreed. Councilmember Chen agreed it was probably better to have Mr. Turley answer questions. The intent today is to have a discussion. Council President Tibbott and he felt this was critical and time sensitive considering the General Fund reserve policy. Councilmember Paine, a member of the Finance Committee, said she was upset and irritated she was not consulted. She found that discourteous and something that should be addressed by the three of them. She requested that be scheduled as soon as possible. Councilmember Teitzel said looking at the August financial report was like driving down the freeway looking in the rearview mirror. The real issue is the budget and the fund balance going negative and how that will be addressed by policy. He was not sure how to blend the August financial report with the budget and the end of the year forecast and he tended to agree with Councilmember Buckshnis about holding a special Finance Committee meeting when Mr. Turley returns. Councilmember Chen responded the intent was to review the August financial report which was placed on the agenda as Received for Filing. It was his understanding the council has no knowledge of items on the agenda under Received for Filing and there was no opportunity for discussion. He asked City Clerk Scott Passey to explain the intent of Received for Filing. Mr. Passey answered the Received for Filing category was adopted based on the parliamentary consultant's advice for items that are for information and no council discussion or action is expected. Received for Filing items do not include policy proposals or recommendations, they are just for information. In response to Councilmember Paine's objection about this agenda item, Councilmember Chen began to explain. Councilmember Paine raised a point of order, stating she preferred to have this discussion in council chambers with the council president. Councilmember Chen pointed out there was a motion and second to amend the agenda and the council voted unanimously to add to this as an agenda item under Council Business. Council President Tibbott suggested tabling this to another meeting. He was glad this was before the council, commenting the council should be especially aware of the General Fund balance and how that relates to budget decisions. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO TABLE THIS TO A SPECIAL MEETING LATER IN THE MONTH. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 23 Packet Pg. 65 7.3.a Councilmember Teitzel asked what was meant by later in the month and suggested next week. Council President Tibbott advised a special meeting requires notice. City Clerk Scott Passey explained postponing to a date certain would require a specific date, otherwise the matter would be postponed indefinitely and the council president could bring it back whenever there was room on an agenda. COUNCIL PRESIDENT TIBBOTT MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO POSTPONE INDEFINITELY. MOTION CARRIED (6-0-1), COUNCILMEMBER PAINE ABSTAINING. 7. ADJOURN With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes October 10, 2023 Page 24 Packet Pg. 66 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Kimberly Dunscombe Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Lori Palmer Background/History Approval of payroll checks #65817 through #65821 dated October 5, 2023 for $10,051.99, payroll direct deposit for $883,906.08, benefit checks #65822 through #65826 and wire payments for $840,788.61 for the pay period of September 16, 2023 through September 30, 2023. Staff Recommendation Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of payments. Attachments: benefit checks summary 09-30-2023 payroll earnings summary 09-30-2023 Packet Pg. 67 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,104 - 09/16/2023 to 09/30/2023 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 65822 10/05/2023 bpas BPAS 22,019.98 0.00 65823 10/05/2023 chap1 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 175.00 0.00 65824 10/05/2023 icma MISSIONSQUARE PLAN SERVICES 6,157.81 0.00 65825 10/05/2023 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 4,301.83 0.00 65826 10/05/2023 afscme WSCCCE, AFSCME AFL-CIO 3,099.85 0.00 35,754.47 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 3577 10/05/2023 pens DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 375,106.81 0.00 3580 10/05/2023 aflac AFLAC 3,341.30 0.00 3583 10/05/2023 us US BANK 178,784.27 0.00 3584 10/05/2023 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 162,122.94 0.00 3585 10/05/2023 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 50,769.00 0.00 3586 10/05/2023 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 34,204.82 0.00 3587 10/05/2023 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 705.00 0.00 805,034.14 0.00 Grand Totals: 840,788.61 0.00 7.4.a 10/4/2023 Packet Pg. 68 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,104 (09/16/2023 to 09/30/2023) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 111 ABSENT NO PAY LEAVE 36.00 0.00 112 ABSENT NO PAY NON HIRED 96.00 0.00 120 SICK SICK LEAVE - L & 1 80.00 3,606.50 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 661.25 35,522.04 122 VACATION VACATION 1,026.67 56,270.60 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 169.00 8,401.64 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 26.00 1,404.13 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 245.25 12,327.74 128 HOLIDAY Holiday Bank WWTP 44.00 2,238.56 129 SICK Police Sick Leave L & 1 36.00 1,725.94 131 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE 24.00 1,368.88 135 SICK WASHINGTON STATE SICK LEAVE 8.00 178.00 141 BEREAVEMENT BEREAVEMENT 27.00 2,264.13 149 KELLY DAY KELLY DAYS BUY BACK 48.00 2,969.68 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Day Used 49.00 2,460.33 153 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY BUY BACK 70.00 4,330.78 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 92.28 5,158.38 157 SICK SICK LEAVE PAYOFF 1,255.12 75,470.63 158 VACATION VACATION PAYOFF 766.43 46,118.49 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 132.00 11,557.09 161 VACATION VACATION PREMIUM PAYOFF 12.00 742.42 170 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL BASE PAY 700.00 9,916.62 174 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PRESIDENTS PAY 0.00 300.00 175 REGULAR HOURS COUNCIL PAY FOR NO MEDICAL 0.00 4,866.36 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 18,035.00 965,645.58 191 REGULAR HOURS FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS 3.00 4,462.19 193 REGULAR HOURS LIGHT DUTY 35.00 1,917.79 194 SICK Emerqency Sick Leave 159.00 11,848.39 195 REGULAR HOURS ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE 80.00 4,645.00 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 7.00 306.10 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 48.00 3,365.51 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 5.00 625.56 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 653.25 56,647.17 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 23.25 1,988.68 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 -16,466.59 10/04/2023 Packet Pg. 69 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,104 (09/16/2023 to 09/30/2023) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 564.73 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 2,724.97 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 5,513.80 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 63.25 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 196.00 0.00 902 MISCELLANEOUS BOOT ALLOWANCE 0.00 211.00 acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 198.72 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 243.66 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstruction ist 0.00 54.76 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 201.58 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 113.61 deftat MISCELLANEOUS DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 94.36 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 138.08 det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 964.64 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 859.16 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 420.60 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 10,371.97 firear MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 487.05 hol HOLIDAY HOLIDAY 10.00 876.77 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 138.08 less MISCELLANEOUS LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR 0.00 98.73 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 875.52 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 1,477.09 Ig12 LONGEVITY Longevity 9% 0.00 1,836.83 Ig13 LONGEVITY Longevity 7% 0.00 1,349.83 Ig14 LONGEVITY Longevity 5% 0.00 777.69 Iq2 LONGEVITY PAY LONGEVITY PAY 4% 0.00 346.28 Iq4 LONGEVITY Longevity 1% 0.00 1,229.95 Iq5 LONGEVITY Longevity 3% 0.00 2,792.30 Iq7 LONGEVITY Longevity 1.5% 0.00 562.08 mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 138.08 ooc MISCELLANEOUS OUT OF CLASS 200.63 1,941.04 pfml ABSENT Paid Family Medical Leave 8.00 0.00 pfmp ABSENT Paid Family Medical Unpaid/Sup 11.50 0.00 pfmv VACATION Paid Family Medical Vacation 17.50 958.86 10/04/2023 Packet Pg. 70 Hour Type Hour Class Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,104 (09/16/2023 to 09/30/2023) Description Hours Amount pfnp ABSENT PAID FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAID 8.00 0.00 phy MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,195.19 sqt MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE SERGEANT 0.00 219.02 slw SICK SICK LEAVE ADD BACK 408.00 0.00 St REGULAR HOURS Serqeant Pay 0.00 164.27 str MISCELLANEOUS STREET CRIMES 0.00 219.02 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 262.90 25,575.38 $1,365,806.54 Total Net Pay: $893,958.07 7.4.b 10/04/2023 Packet Pg. 71 7.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #259462 through #259560 dated October 5, 2023 for $715,543.93, checks #259561 through #259701 dated October 12, 2023 for $994,538.60 and wire payments of $1,451.72 & $7,811.86. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks and wire payments. Narrative The Council President shall be designated as the auditing committee for the city council. The council president shall review the documentation supporting claims paid and review for approval by the city council at its next regular public meeting all checks or warrants issued in payment of any claim, demand or voucher. A list of each claim, demand or voucher approved and each check or warrant issued indicating the check or warrant number, the amount paid and the vendor or payee shall be filed in the city council office for review by individual councilmembers prior to each regularly scheduled public meeting. Attachments: Claims 10-05-23 Agenda copy Claims 10-12-23 Agenda copy Packet Pg. 72 7.5.a apPosPay Positive Pay Listing Page: 1 10/5/2023 7:21:40AM City of Edmonds Document group: jacobson Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 259462 10/5/2023 5,973.02 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 259463 10/5/2023 513.84 000135 ABSCO ALARMS INC 259464 10/5/2023 1,719.57 064088 ADT COMMERCIAL 259465 10/5/2023 302.87 075836 AKTIVOV LLC 259466 10/5/2023 870.19 065568 ALLWATER INC 259467 10/5/2023 104.15 074718 AQUATIC SPECIALTY SERVICES INC 259468 10/5/2023 2,126.24 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 259469 10/5/2023 311.34 064341 AT&T MOBILITY 259470 10/5/2023 43.35 028050 BILL PIERRE FORD INC 259471 10/5/2023 77.94 074587 BOURNE, CHRISTINE D 259472 10/5/2023 250.00 077181 BOYER ELECTRIC CO INC 259473 10/5/2023 142,304.00 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 259474 10/5/2023 70.66 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY 259475 10/5/2023 362.42 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS 259476 10/5/2023 6,120.00 063902 CITY OF EVERETT 259477 10/5/2023 693.00 019215 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 259478 10/5/2023 42,307.00 064369 CODE PUBLISHING LLC 259479 10/5/2023 10,599.95 068358 COLUMBIA CASCADE COMPANY 259480 10/5/2023 37,050.65 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 259481 10/5/2023 562.76 065891 CONLEY, LISA M 259482 10/5/2023 160.00 065683 CORRY'S FINE DRY CLEANING 259483 10/5/2023 142.60 079408 CRANDELL, DOUG 259484 10/5/2023 130.00 079077 D & D CARPET CLEANING LLC 259485 10/5/2023 6,320.60 079013 DEALERSHIP GLASS AUTO GLASS 259486 10/5/2023 703.99 079405 DESIGN WEST ENGINEERING INC 259487 10/5/2023 6,400.00 079411 DETHLEFS, STEPHANIE YVONNE 259488 10/5/2023 130.00 078419 DIAMOND PARKING 259489 10/5/2023 3,000.00 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 259490 10/5/2023 812.00 076172 DK SYSTEMS 259491 10/5/2023 907.57 007253 DUNN LUMBER 259492 10/5/2023 207.88 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 259493 10/5/2023 71.81 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 259494 10/5/2023 1,083.97 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 259495 10/5/2023 100.90 079400 ERSFELD, ALISON 259496 10/5/2023 130.00 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 259497 10/5/2023 101.48 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 259498 10/5/2023 1,913.06 012199 GRAINGER 259499 10/5/2023 435.13 012560 HACH COMPANY 259500 10/5/2023 739.80 063819 HALL, LESLIE 259501 10/5/2023 130.00 064357 HARTMAN, EDMUND 259502 10/5/2023 350.00 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 259503 10/5/2023 6,187.76 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 259504 10/5/2023 208.47 061013 HONEY BUCKET 259505 10/5/2023 4,216.72 075966 HULBERT, CARRIE 259506 10/5/2023 5,618.34 076488 HULBERT, MATTHEW STIEG 259507 10/5/2023 600.00 069733 ICONIX WATERWORKS INC 259508 10/5/2023 2,265.80 075062 JAMESTOWN NETWORKS 259509 10/5/2023 651.95 079227 JAMTOW N LLC 259510 10/5/2023 264.00 078946 KITCHENS, KYLEE 259511 10/5/2023 621.60 067568 KPG PSOMAS INC 259512 10/5/2023 5,303.50 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 259513 10/5/2023 116.38 079409 KUYATT, MEGAN 259514 10/5/2023 130.00 Page: 1 Packet Pg. 73 apPosPay Positive Pay Listing 10/5/2023 7:21:40AM City of Edmonds Document group: jacobson Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount 078471 LEMM, KEVIN 259515 10/5/2023 718.90 074848 LONG BAY ENTERPRISES INC 259516 10/5/2023 6,425.73 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO 259517 10/5/2023 771.79 066258 MARENAKOS INC 259518 10/5/2023 16,160.63 076177 MCKINSTRY LOCKBOX 259519 10/5/2023 23,256.45 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 259520 10/5/2023 40.22 075746 MCMURRAY, LAURA 259521 10/5/2023 166.50 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 259522 10/5/2023 317.65 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 259523 10/5/2023 85.52 064215 NORTHWEST PUMP & EQUIP CO 259524 10/5/2023 15,318.34 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 259525 10/5/2023 289.23 065051 PARAMETRIX INC 259526 10/5/2023 15,231.25 027450 PAWS 259527 10/5/2023 2,541.00 079406 PECK, ROBERT 259528 10/5/2023 85.60 073266 PILGRIM MEDIA SERVICES 259529 10/5/2023 200.00 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 259530 10/5/2023 196.95 078800 POPA & ASSOCIATES 259531 10/5/2023 1,200.00 046900 PUGET SOUND ENERGY 259532 10/5/2023 5,947.07 030455 PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL 259533 10/5/2023 19,222.00 068657 ROBERT HALF 259534 10/5/2023 629.28 064769 ROMAINE ELECTRIC 259535 10/5/2023 238.90 079387 SAYBR CONTRACTORS INC 259536 10/5/2023 160,571.05 067262 SENIOR SOFTBALL USA 259537 10/5/2023 820.13 063306 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 259538 10/5/2023 139.62 079404 STALER, LUIS 259539 10/5/2023 171.00 079410 SIELING, ARIELE 259540 10/5/2023 130.00 060889 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL 259541 10/5/2023 560.47 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 259542 10/5/2023 3,624.49 076433 SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 259543 10/5/2023 79,997.25 075875 SOUND CLEANING RESOURCES INC 259544 10/5/2023 1,165.67 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 259545 10/5/2023 3,770.36 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 259546 10/5/2023 99.75 076114 SOUND SALMON SOLUTIONS 259547 10/5/2023 2,500.00 075025 THE BRANDING IRON LLC 259548 10/5/2023 1,142.13 065459 THE HERALD SUBSCRIPTION 259549 10/5/2023 307.68 079359 THE WALLS LAW FIRM INC 259550 10/5/2023 25,000.00 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 259551 10/5/2023 64.37 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 259552 10/5/2023 14,988.92 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 259553 10/5/2023 558.07 067917 WALLY'STOWING INC 259554 10/5/2023 561.85 071424 WASHINGTON ENERGY SERVICES 259555 10/5/2023 72.80 075283 WAVE 259556 10/5/2023 304.98 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 259557 10/5/2023 33.13 075926 WESTERN EXTERMINATOR 259558 10/5/2023 140.28 064213 WSSUATREASURER 259559 10/5/2023 6,000.00 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 259560 10/5/2023 1,258.66 GrandTotal: 715,543.93 Total count: 99 Page: 2 Packet Pg. 74 7.5.b apPosPay Positive Pay Listing Page: 1 10/12/2023 11:21:43AM City of Edmonds Document group: jacobson Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount 078925 425 MAGAZINE 259561 10/12/2023 1,900.00 076040 911 SUPPLY INC 259562 10/12/2023 1,339.23 073947 A WORKSAFE SERVICE INC 259563 10/12/2023 230.00 065052 AARD PEST CONTROL 259564 10/12/2023 103.87 079415 ADRIENNE ROSS SCANLAN 259565 10/12/2023 250.00 079403 AGUILAR, JENNIFER 259566 10/12/2023 291.25 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 259567 10/12/2023 199,976.00 074488 ALPHA COURIER INC 259568 10/12/2023 201.16 064246 ALS LABORATORY GROUP 259569 10/12/2023 904.00 001528 AM TEST INC 259570 10/12/2023 965.00 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 259571 10/12/2023 388.02 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 259572 10/12/2023 178.71 064341 AT&T MOBILITY 259573 10/12/2023 1,748.19 079382 ATWELL LLC 259574 10/12/2023 20,332.00 079407 AUTHORS UNBOUND AGENCY 259575 10/12/2023 7,013.81 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 259576 10/12/2023 355.00 079401 BAUGHMAN, APRIL 259577 10/12/2023 299.25 072577 BAURECHT, MAGRIT 259578 10/12/2023 1,530.00 012005 BENDIKSEN & BALL POLYGRAPH 259579 10/12/2023 900.00 069226 BHC CONSULTANTS LLC 259580 10/12/2023 6,335.46 075672 BOATWRIGHT, ALICE KARTH 259581 10/12/2023 250.00 070052 BOONE, MARY ELIZABETH 259582 10/12/2023 364.00 002800 BRAKE & CLUTCH SUPPLY 259583 10/12/2023 176.25 072005 BROCKMANN, KERRY 259584 10/12/2023 1,878.50 077079 BUCHANAN PHD, LAURIE J 259585 10/12/2023 412.00 003001 BUILDERS SAND & GRAVEL 259586 10/12/2023 6,881.56 079015 BURKLANE, AMBER 259587 10/12/2023 199.49 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 259588 10/12/2023 1,801.47 071816 CARLSON, JESSICA 259589 10/12/2023 888.25 078937 CARTAINO, CAROL 259590 10/12/2023 240.00 069813 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 259591 10/12/2023 283.65 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY 259592 10/12/2023 229.19 073249 CG ENGINEERING, PLLC 259593 10/12/2023 10,297.50 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 259594 10/12/2023 661.59 079412 COLE, DOUGLAS 259595 10/12/2023 425.00 078902 COLEMAN OIL COMPANY LLC 259596 10/12/2023 41,559.90 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 259597 10/12/2023 207.06 075384 CONOM LAW FIRM PLLC 259598 10/12/2023 771.09 079416 COOK, MELISSA 259599 10/12/2023 412.00 075648 COVICH-WILLIAMS CO INC 259600 10/12/2023 613.50 077245 CRASH DATA GROUP INC 259601 10/12/2023 1,500.00 074444 DATAQUEST LLC 259602 10/12/2023 205.00 079417 DE DAKIS, JOHN 259603 10/12/2023 837.00 047450 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 259604 10/12/2023 285.00 079411 DETHLEFS, STEPHANIE YVONNE 259605 10/12/2023 202.00 078419 DIAMOND PARKING 259606 10/12/2023 3,000.00 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 259607 10/12/2023 484.00 074592 DRISCOLL, SCOTT 259608 10/12/2023 162.00 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 259609 10/12/2023 234.93 079434 EHLERT, ALEXANDRA 259610 10/12/2023 229.65 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 259611 10/12/2023 1,021.94 079430 ETTINGER, AMELIA 259612 10/12/2023 412.00 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 259613 10/12/2023 122.12 Page: 1 Packet Pg. 75 apPosPay Positive Pay Listing 10/12/2023 11:21:43AM City of Edmonds Document group: jacobson Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount 078073 FALLS, KATHLEEN 259614 10/12/2023 574.00 079361 FEAREY 259615 10/12/2023 1,308.56 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 259616 10/12/2023 2,983.50 079184 FORMA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 259617 10/12/2023 1,845.53 072634 GCP WW HOLDCO LLC 259618 10/12/2023 381.08 063137 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER 259619 10/12/2023 377.34 012199 GRAINGER 259620 10/12/2023 60.97 079012 HARLOWE & FALK LLP 259621 10/12/2023 160.00 079423 HARTUNG, MARIE 259622 10/12/2023 100.00 076047 HEDREEN, ANN 259623 10/12/2023 162.00 079399 HERITAGE SEEDLINGS & LINERS 259624 10/12/2023 699.25 078923 HKA GLOBAL INC 259625 10/12/2023 2,760.00 076240 HM PACIFIC NORTHWEST INC 259626 10/12/2023 803.61 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 259627 10/12/2023 174.25 061013 HONEY BUCKET 259628 10/12/2023 290.95 079170 HOOPLA FACE PAINTING &BALLOONS 259629 10/12/2023 600.00 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 259630 10/12/2023 1,164.87 079398 INTEGRA REALTY RESOURCES 259631 10/12/2023 3,500.00 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 259632 10/12/2023 408.74 079428 JONES, FALAAH 259633 10/12/2023 100.00 072101 KCR MEDIA GROUP INC 259634 10/12/2023 400.00 079069 KISHA POST 259635 10/12/2023 4,865.00 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC 259636 10/12/2023 149.12 070120 L E A D S.ONLINE INC 259637 10/12/2023 2,887.00 079431 LANCTOT, REBECCAANN 259638 10/12/2023 202.00 078360 LANGUAGE LINE SOLUTIONS 259639 10/12/2023 1,299.34 079427 LEHNERZ, LARRY ROBERT 259640 10/12/2023 100.00 070643 LETKO, KENNETH 259641 10/12/2023 140.00 073603 LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC 259642 10/12/2023 59,177.10 079425 LOW, BENSON 259643 10/12/2023 75.00 079433 MAGGI, NICOLE MARIE 259644 10/12/2023 160.00 020900 MILLERS EQUIP & RENT ALL INC 259645 10/12/2023 2,918.04 075596 MOE, LAURA L 259646 10/12/2023 250.00 079414 MONSON, MARIANNE 259647 10/12/2023 337.00 018950 NAPA AUTO PARTS 259648 10/12/2023 219.55 074798 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE 259649 10/12/2023 965.41 067834 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS 259650 10/12/2023 39.78 070855 NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 259651 10/12/2023 228.25 024960 NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY 259652 10/12/2023 158.06 075542 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 259653 10/12/2023 582.86 064215 NORTHWEST PUMP & EQUIP CO 259654 10/12/2023 9,391.95 072739 O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 259658 10/12/2023 48.68 076902 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF WA 259655 10/12/2023 177.00 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 259656 10/12/2023 4,116.97 002079 OPEN SQUARE 259657 10/12/2023 17,811.23 068451 OSW EQUIPMENT & REPAIR LLC 259659 10/12/2023 4,530.35 075130 PATRICK DOHERTY PROF SVCS 259660 10/12/2023 546.00 072507 PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT 259661 10/12/2023 404.00 079402 PELLERIN, MAKENNA 259662 10/12/2023 592.38 074793 PETDATA INC 259663 10/12/2023 69.70 078952 PHONXAYLINKHAM, PHAIVANH 259664 10/12/2023 82.75 073266 PILGRIM MEDIA SERVICES 259665 10/12/2023 400.00 078364 PILLOW FORT LLC 259666 10/12/2023 574.00 079426 PINTO, CHRISTINE A 259667 10/12/2023 162.00 Page: 2 Packet Pg. 76 apPosPay Positive Pay Listing 10/12/2023 11:21:43AM City of Edmonds Document group: jacobson Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 259668 10/12/2023 201.87 078792 PP -WA LLC PILCHUCK VET HOSP 259669 10/12/2023 559.16 030780 QUIRING MONUMENTS INC 259670 10/12/2023 675.00 079394 RAEDEKE ASSOCIATES INC 259671 10/12/2023 2,444.17 079421 RAVEN, CATHERINE LUCILLE 259672 10/12/2023 837.00 062657 REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY 259673 10/12/2023 2,161.53 068657 ROBERT HALF 259674 10/12/2023 4,620.00 074834 ROBINSON, JASON 259675 10/12/2023 174.25 067439 SANELLI, MARY LOU 259676 10/12/2023 134.00 079221 SEATOWN ELECTRIC PLUMBING 259677 10/12/2023 73.94 079418 SHARPER WORDS LLC 259678 10/12/2023 162.00 079420 SIT WRITE HERE 259679 10/12/2023 574.00 075590 SMARSH INC 259680 10/12/2023 22.94 075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC 259681 10/12/2023 36,290.00 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 259682 10/12/2023 21,235.84 037303 SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE 259683 10/12/2023 18,528.26 075675 SORENSON FORENSICS LLC 259684 10/12/2023 7,448.00 039775 STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE 259685 10/12/2023 39,853.61 079422 STENBERG, NAOMI S 259686 10/12/2023 75.00 079424 TAYLOR, LISA C 259687 10/12/2023 412.00 075025 THE BRANDING IRON LLC 259688 10/12/2023 396.40 079432 TRUE, ARIANNE 259689 10/12/2023 202.00 075762 VECA ELECTRIC & TECHNOLOGIES 259690 10/12/2023 7,696.33 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 259691 10/12/2023 27.54 075155 WALKER MACY LLC 259692 10/12/2023 4,135.00 077785 WASHINGTON KIDS IN TRANSITION 259693 10/12/2023 84,625.39 065035 WASHINGTON STATE PATROL 259694 10/12/2023 68.50 078314 WASTE MGMT DISPOSAL SVC OF OR 259695 10/12/2023 185,550.16 073552 WELCO SALES LLC 259696 10/12/2023 66.26 071467 WEST COAST PET MEMORIAL 259697 10/12/2023 57.00 069691 WESTERN SYSTEMS 259698 10/12/2023 110,566.26 064008 WETLANDS & WOODLANDS 259699 10/12/2023 9,167.52 063008 WSDOT 259700 10/12/2023 215.35 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 259701 10/12/2023 278.56 GrandTotal: 994,538.60 Total count: 141 Page: 3 Packet Pg. 77 7.6 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Approval of Supplemental Agreement with WSP for construction management services on the 76th Ave Overlay project. Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On August 23, 2022, City Council approved a Local Agency Consultant Agreement with WSP for construction management and inspection services on the 76th Ave Overlay project. On August 15, 2023, City Council approved a supplemental agreement with WSP. On October 10, 2023, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the consent agenda. Staff Recommendation Approve supplemental agreement. Narrative The City contracted with WSP in August 2022 to provide construction management and material services for the 76th Ave Overlay project. The construction work is complete and final close-out will continue into 2024. The term of the agreement is being extended thru June 2024 so WSP can assist with the close-out process and be available if WSDOT performs an audit on the federal documents and project billing. Local agencies must use WSDOT's Local Agency Consultant Agreement when there are federal or state transportation grant funds. The Agreement includes a completion date. The proposed Supplemental Agreement is only necessary to extend the contract time and it is a no cost adjustment. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Supplemental Agreement Attachment 2 - Area Map Packet Pg. 78 7.6.a Washington State Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address Number 2 WSP USA Inc 1001 4th Ave, Ste 3100 Seattle, WA 98154 Original Agreement Number LA-10024 Phone: 206-431-2269 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date STPUL-2511(005) 08/24/2022 06/30/2024 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable City of Edmonds 76th Avenue W Overlay Project $ 137,612 (Unchanged) Description of Work Extending the contract date. (No cost change) The Local Agency of City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with WSP USA Inc and executed on 8/24/2022 and identified as Agreement No. LA-10024 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: No change 11 Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: No change III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: No change If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. LIM Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature r Q E a� a� a, Q co w a� E a� a a U) c a) E s 0 Q m E 0 r r Q DOT Form 140-063 Revised 09/2005 Packet Pg. 79 7.6.b 76TH AVE PAVE - AREA MAP 4r, llol n d� f END PAVE T�� iC o� j yM .,. � I F= �^ - & � � � V EW DRY r r ` z , —k' PERRINVILLE 3- f rr �. e . R- - • � FJ -in t,. u � t r ,.ter � • r�} t ! T 4 �_� •�T �' � � -Err i —J F �— , r �(t- I,q� �1� � �, ' � ✓ �- ..r. - ��j'*�+uw^ A � � � yr{ �p5 �;�. �` .1 r 'r j rl G .-�...�.._ � i i:rz v �,,� ;fir x.�'✓ - ,r � �• 6 ' u cT7"• I r r - -ram _ �— v_:'A:. • ..-� r ^ Fry. F. ' 191 st St SW r r n, F v� 193rd PI SW_' Q Packet Pg. 80 7.7 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Approval of Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for Highway 99 Stage 2 Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On September 9, 2017, City Council approved Local Agency Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project. On December 13, 2018, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project. On December 17, 2019, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project. On July 21, 2020, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project. On October 19, 2021, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project. On April 19, 2022, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project. On June 27, 2023, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with SCJ for the Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project. On October 10, 2023, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the consent agenda. Staff Recommendation Approve supplemental agreement. Narrative As part of the Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway project - Stage 2, a landscaped raised median with mid - block left turns was installed along Hwy 99 from 244th St. SW to 212th St. SW. In addition, gateway signs were installed on both ends of the corridor and a HAWK signal was added just north of Highway 99 @ 234th St. SW. SCJ has been working on Construction Support since the beginning of the construction phase in 2022. This supplemental agreement extends their contract date from January 1, 2024 to Packet Pg. 81 7.7 December 31, 2024 in order for SG to complete additional Construction Support tasks (records drawings) and is a no cost adjustment to the current Agreement. The only remaining work for the contractor is for plant establishment. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Agreement Packet Pg. 82 7.7.a Washington State TAF Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address Number 7 Shea, Carr, & Jewell, Inc. 8730 Tallon Lane NE, Suite 200 Original Agreement Number Lacey, WA 98516 LA-9146 Phone: 360-352-1465 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date HLP-CNWA(13) 9/13/2017 12/31/2024 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Highway 99 Gateway/Reviialization Project No Change ($1,588,613 Maximum Amount Payable) Description of Work No change in scope of work. Extend the completion date to 12/31/2024. The Local Agency of City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with Shea. Carr, & Jewell, Inc. and executed on September 13, 2017 and identified as Agreement No. LA-9146 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: No change in scope. Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion Of the work to read: Comnletion date to extend to December 31, 2024. III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: No change - Maximum Amount Payable $1.588.613.00 as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: Lisa M. Reid, PE, PMP I Principal By: Consuy§n&gnature Approving Authority Signature Date DOT Form 140-063 Revised 09/2005 Packet Pg. 83 7.8 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Approval of Supplemental Agreement with WSP for Highway 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project Staff Lead: Rob English Department: Engineering Preparer: Emiko Rodarte Background/History On May 17, 2022 City Council approved the Local Agency Consultant Agreement with WSP for the Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project Stage 2. On June 27, 2023, City Council approved a Supplemental Agreement with WSP for the Highway 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project. On October 10, 2023, staff presented this item to the Parks and Public Works Committee and it was forwarded to the consent agenda. Staff Recommendation Approve supplemental agreement. Narrative The City contracted with WSP in May 2022 to provide construction management and material testing services for the Highway 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project Stage 2. The services were needed to support City staff during the construction phase. The majority of construction work is now complete and staff will be working with WSP over the next several months to finalize project documents and close-out the project. Local agencies must use WSDOT's Local Agency Consultant Agreement when there are federal or state transportation grant funds. This Agreement includes a completion date. The proposed Supplemental Agreement will extend the completion date to December 31, 2024 to provide ample time to complete the close-out phase since the plant establishment work will continue into 2024. The Supplemental Agreement is only necessary to extend the contract time and it is a no cost adjustment to the original Agreement. Attachments: Attachment 1 - Supplemental Agreement Packet Pg. 84 7.8.a Washington State wo Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Organization and Address Number 2 WSP USA Inc 1001 4th Ave, Ste 3100 Seattle, WA 98154 Original Agreement Number Phone: 206-431-2269 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date HLP-CNWA(013) 12/31/2024 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Highway 99 Revitalization and Gateway Project (Stage 2) $636,578 Description of Work Extending the contract date. (No cost change) The Local Agency of City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with WSP USA Inc and executed on 5/24/2022 and identified as Agreement No All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: No change 11 Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: New Contract Completion Date 12/31/2024 III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: No change If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. 'ZJ Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature DOT Form 140-063 Revised 09/2005 Packet Pg. 85 7.9 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Amending ECC 5.05.122 F.1-Ammending the Dangerous Dog Statute Staff Lead: Shane Hawley Department: Police Services Preparer: Alexandra Ehlert Background/History Edmonds City Code allows for certain dogs to be declared "dangerous", in certain circumstances. These animal complaints are handled by the Edmonds Police Department (generally animal control). The entire process is a police matter. However, the city code specifically points an applicant seeking to properly register their dog, to City Hall. The police department has agreed to take over the process of accepting payments for this process. This is a way to streamline the process. It also just makes more sense to have the police department handle the entire process from start to finish. This amendment would only change one part of the city code. It removes the direction for the form and payment to go to the City Clerk and directs the applicant to the police department. Recommendation Passing the attached on the consent agenda for 10/17. Accept and amend ECC 5.05.122 F.1, changing "City Clerk" to "Police Department" in the ordinance. Narrative N/A Attachments: DRAFT Ordinance Amending ECC 5.05.122 9.22.2023 Packet Pg. 86 7.9.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 5.05 ECC (ANIMAL CONTROL) TO UPDATE CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR DANGEROUS DOGS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has, under Edmonds City Code (ECC) Section 5.05.122 (Animal Control, Dangerous Dogs), adopted certain requirements relating to the keeping of dangerous dogs in the City of Edmonds; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Police Department is taking over processing certain elements of dangerous dog applications from the City Clerk's Office; and WHEREAS, the ECC currently directs applicants to the City Clerk's Office to obtain applications and contains minor typographical errors; and WHEREAS, after review and discussion, the City Council has determined it to be appropriate to amend ECC 5.05.122 to update certain dangerous dog provisions to provide accurate information to the public; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ECC 5.05.122, Subsection F, is hereby amended to read as follows (new text shown in underline; deleted text shown in stfike thfa ig ): 5.05.122 Dangerous dogs. The provisions of this section apply to the extent they are not inconsistent with the provisions of Chapter 16.08 RCW. A. Declaration. Upon declaration by the animal control authority that a dog is a dangerous dog as defined in ECC 5.05.010, the owner shall be served with a dangerous dog declaration. B. Declaration — Final Determination Unless Appealed. The service of a dangerous dog declaration shall, unless timely appealed, be a final determination that the dog is a dangerous dog. C. Notice — Contents of Dangerous Dog Declaration. A dangerous dog declaration shall contain: Packet Pg. 87 7.9.a 1. The name and address, if known, of the owner of the animal; 2. The license number, if available, and description of the animal or dog; 3. A statement that the animal control authority has found the animal to be a dangerous dog as defined in ECC 5.05.010 and a concise description explaining why the declaration has been made; 4. A statement that service of the dangerous dog declaration is a final determination unless appealed and that an appeal must be filed within five days of service of the dangerous dog declaration; 5. A copy of ECC 5.05.123 regarding appeal procedures; 6. A copy of ECC 5.05.124 regarding disposition of seized and removed animals. D. Notice — Service. Service of the dangerous dog declaration upon the owner of the animal may be made either by personal service to the owner, by posting such notice at the residence of the owner or by certified mail to the last known address of the owner. E. Appeal. Appeals shall be heard by the judge of the Edmonds municipal court and conducted in accordance with ECC 5.05.123. F. Requirements for Dangerous Dogs. Strict compliance with each of the following conditions is required to keep a dangerous dog in the city of Edmonds: 1. In addition to any license required under the provisions of this chapter, all dog owners who are required to obtain a certificate of registration, pursuant to the dangerous dog provisions of Chapter 16.08 RCW, must obtain a city of Edmonds dangerous dog certificate of registration. The applicant shall apply for such certificate upon forms supplied by the Edmonds Police Department e and pay an annual fee of $100.00, which shall not be prorated for any part of a year. A copy of a valid certificate of registration issued pursuant to Chapter 16.08 RCW shall be attached to the application. The city of Edmonds dangerous dog certificate of registration shall be issued upon completing the requirements of this section. 2. The owner of a dangerous dog shall provide for proper enclosure of a the dangerous dog. A dangerous dog may not be outside of the dwelling of the owner or outside of a proper enclosure of a dangerous dog unless muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash and under the control of a responsible person. The muzzle shall be made Packet Pg. 88 7.9.a in a manner that will not cause injury to the dog nor interfere with its vision or respiration but shall prevent it from biting any person or animal. 3. The owner of a dangerous dog shall secure liability insurance coverage or a surety bond as required by Chapter 16.08 RCW. 4. The owner of a dangerous dog shall be required to post the premises with a clearly visible warning sign that there is a dangerous dog on the property. In addition, the owner shall conspicuously display a sign with a warning symbol that informs children of the presence of a dangerous dog. G. Failure to Comply with Dangerous Dog Requirements. Any dangerous dog shall be seized and removed by animal control officer i£ 1. The dog is not validly registered under this chapter and Chapter 16.08 RCW; 2. The owner does not secure liability insurance coverage or a surety bond as required by Chapter 16.08 RCW; 3. The dog is not maintained in a proper enclosure; 4. The dog is outside of the dwelling of the owner or outside of a proper enclosure and not muzzled and restrained by a substantial chain or leash and under the control of a responsible person; or 5. The owner has failed to post the property with warning signs as required. H. Penalty. Failing to comply with any dangerous dog requirement is a gross misdemeanor. A dangerous dog seized and removed in violation of dangerous dog requirements shall not be released during investigation of or prosecution for failure to comply with dangerous dog requirements. Any person convicted of failing to comply with dangerous dog requirements shall make restitution to the city of Edmonds for all costs incurred in boarding and disposition of such dog and shall forfeit any interest in such dog. I. The provisions of this section shall not apply to dogs used by law enforcement officials for police work. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Packet Pg. 89 7.9.a Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 90 7.9.a On the Ordinance No. provides as follows: SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington day of 2023, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 5.05 ECC (ANIMAL CONTROL) TO UPDATE CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS FOR DANGEROUS DOGS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 2023. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 91 7.10 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Amending ECC 5.01.010-Adoption of RCW 9.94A.835 (Special Allegation -Sexual Motivation) Staff Lead: Shane Hawley Department: Police Services Preparer: Alexandra Ehlert Background/History For many years, RCW 9.94A.835 has existed to enhance the penalties for those who commit crimes based on sexually motivated criteria. While the vast majority of "sex crimes" are specifically codified as separate offenses, there are times when an individual might commit a crime that would not normally be of a sexual nature, but the underlying motives prove otherwise. In those cases, RCW 9.94A.835 allows a prosecuting attorney to file the charge with a "special allegation" and flag the offense as being committed for the sexual gratification of the person committing the crime. The RCW specifically allows for ANY level of crime to carry this special allegation. It is not solely reserved for felony level crimes. As such, the City of Edmonds can adopt this and have these allegations brought forward in municipal court charging. For reference, an example of this in practice would be a misdemeanor trespass charge. Most of those charges are for someone being on private property without permission. However, if a person was trespassing on someone's private property and engaged in sexually motivated conduct while doing so, the special allegation might apply. As you can imagine, these sorts of crimes are very concerning to the police department and the public in general. This amendment adopts by reference RCW 9.94A.835 into ECC 5.01.010. Recommendation Approve the attached on consent at the 10/17 meeting. Accept and modify Edmonds Municipal Code section 5.01.010 adding RCW 9.94A.835 to the city code. Narrative N/A Attachments: DRAFT Ordinance Amending ECC 5.01.010 7.13.2023 RCW 9.94A.835 Special allegation --Sexual motivation--Procedures[1] Packet Pg. 92 7.10.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 5.01 ECC (PUBLIC SAFETY AND MORALS, PRELIMINARY ARTICLE) TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE RCW 9.94A.835; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has, under Edmonds City Code (ECC) Section 5.01.010 (Public Safety and Morals, Preliminary Article, General Provisions), adopted certain Washington State statutes by reference, which have general application to the prosecution of crimes; and WHEREAS, the prosecuting attorney is authorized under RCW 9.94A.835 (Special allegation — Sexual motivation — Procedures) to file a special allegation of sexual motivation in every criminal case, including misdemeanors and gross misdemeanors, other than sex offenses as defined in RCW 9.94A.030 when sufficient admissible evidence exists to do so; and WHEREAS, the City's Prosecuting Attorney's Office has determined that it is not currently authorized under the ECC to file such special allegation; and WHEREAS, after review and discussion, the City Council has determined it to be appropriate to amend ECC 5.01.010 to adopt RCW 9.94A.835 by reference; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ECC 5.01.010 is hereby amended to read as follows (new text shown in underline): 5.01.010 General provisions. The following statutes of the state of Washington are adopted by reference: RCW 9.01.055 Citizen immunity of aiding officer 9.01.110 Omission, when not punishable 9.01.120 Civil remedies preserved 9.01.130 Sending letter, when complete 9.01.160 Application to existing civil rights 9.94A.835 Special allegation — Sexual motivation — Procedures 9A.04.020 Purposes — Principles of construction 9A.04.040 Classification of crimes 9A.04.050 People capable of committing crimes (capability of children) 9A.04.060 Common law to supplement statutes 9A.04.070 Who amenable to criminal statutes 9A.04.090 Application of general provisions of the code Packet Pg. 93 7.10.a 9A.04.100 Proof beyond a reasonable doubt 9A.04.110 Definitions Chapter 89, Sections 16 and 17, Laws of 1993 amending RCW 15.60.150 and 15.60.170 establishing criminal penalties for violation of the state beekeeping statutes. Chapter 208, Section 2, Laws of 1993 amending RCW 14.20.020, establishing criminal penalties for acting as an aircraft dealer without a valid aircraft dealer's license. Section 2. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi- cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAYOR MIKE NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 94 7.10.a On the Ordinance No. provides as follows: SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington day of 2023, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 5.01 ECC (PUBLIC SAFETY AND MORALS, PRELIMINARY ARTICLE) TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE RCW 9.94A.835; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 2023. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY Packet Pg. 95 9.94A.835. Special allegation --Sexual motivation --Procedures, WA ST 9.94A.835 7.10.b West's Revised Code of Washington Annotated Title 9. Crimes and Punishments (Refs & Annos) Chapter 9.94A. Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (Refs & Annos) Special Allegations West's RCWA 9.94A.835 9.94A.835. Special allegation --Sexual motivation --Procedures Effective: August 1, 2009 Currentness (1) The prosecuting attorney shall file a special allegation of sexual motivation in every criminal case, felony, gross misdemeanor, or misdemeanor, other than sex offenses as defined in RCW 9.94A.030 when sufficient admissible evidence exists, which, when considered with the most plausible, reasonably foreseeable defense that could be raised under the evidence, would justify a finding of sexual motivation by a reasonable and objective fact finder. (2) In a criminal case wherein there has been a special allegation the state shall prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime with a sexual motivation. The court shall make a finding of fact of whether or not a sexual motivation was present at the time of the commission of the crime, or if a jury trial is had, the jury shall, if it finds the defendant guilty, also find a special verdict as to whether or not the defendant committed the crime with a sexual motivation. This finding shall not be applied to sex offenses as defined in RCW 9.94A.030. (3) The prosecuting attorney shall not withdraw the special allegation of sexual motivation without approval of the court through an order of dismissal of the special allegation. The court shall not dismiss this special allegation unless it finds that such an order is necessary to correct an error in the initial charging decision or unless there are evidentiary problems which make proving the special allegation doubtful. Credits [2009 c 28 § 15, eff. Aug. 1, 2009; 2006 c 123 § 2, eff. July 1, 2006; 1999 c 143 § 11; 1990 c 3 § 601. Formerly RCW 9.94A.127.] OFFICIAL NOTES Effective date--2009 c 28: See note following RCW 2.24.040. Effective date--2006 c 123: See note following RCW 9.94A.533. Effective date--Application--1990 c 3 §§ 601-605: "(1) Sections 601 through 605 of this act, for purposes of sentencing adult or juvenile offenders, shall take effect July 1, 1990, and shall apply to crimes or offenses committed on or after July 1, 1990. (2) For purposes of defining a `sexually violent offense' pursuant to section 1002(4) of this act, sections 601 through 605 of this act shall take effect July 1, 1990, and shall apply to crimes committed on, before, or after July 1, 1990." [1990 c 3 § 606.] WESTLAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Packet Pg. 96 9.94A.835. Special allegation --Sexual motivation --Procedures, WA ST 9.94A.835 7.10.b Notes of Decisions (17) West's RCWA 9.94A.835, WA ST 9.94A.835 Current with all effective legislation of the 2023 Regular Session and First Special Session of the Washington Legislature. Some statute sections may be more current, see credits for details. End of Document © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. r O Lf! U U W C� C 'a3 C E Q OMAW © 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Packet Pg. 97 7.11 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Amending ECC 5.36.045-Creation of the crime of Vehicle Trespass Staff Lead: Shane Hawley Department: Police Services Preparer: Alexandra Ehlert Background/History On average, about 200 thefts from vehicle/vehicle prowling reports are filed with the police department each year. On top of that, another 30-40 "attempts" are also reported. This number is likely much, much higher, as we know that a number of victims never report these crimes if nothing was missing from their vehicle. The crime of Vehicle Prowling currently exists in RCW 9A.52.095 (1st Degree) and RCW 9A.52.100 (2nd Degree). Both of those crimes require someone to ever a motorhome (1st degree) or vehicle (2nd degree) with the intention of committing a crime inside the vehicle. Realistically, this is an incredibly difficult charging standard unless someone has already committed a theft from the vehicle. Often times, we find someone inside a vehicle, or just having entered a vehicle but showing the intention of committing a crime inside that vehicle is challenging. Several cities in the Puget Sound region have independent city codes which have created the crime of "Vehicle Trespass". This is a misdemeanor crime that criminalizes the actual, unlawful entry into a vehicle. Intent is not relevant to the commission of this crime. This amendment creates the misdemeanor crime of Vehicle Trespass. Recommendation Approve the attached on consent at the 10/17 meeting. Accept and amend ECC 5.36.045, creating the crime of Vehicle Trespass. Narrative N/A Attachments: 2023-09-22 Ordinance adopting 5.36.045 Packet Pg. 98 7.11.a ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING SECTION 5.36.045 ECDC ENTITLED "VEHICLE TRESPASS"; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Art. XI, Sec. I I of the Washington State Constitution provides: "Any county, city, town or township may make and enforce within its limits all such local police, sanitary and other regulations as are not in conflict with general laws"; and WHEREAS, Chapter 35A.I I RCW establishes the broad powers that code cities are authorized to perform; and WHEREAS, many cities criminalize vehicle trespass to allow their prosecutors to file criminal charges against an individual who knowingly enters, attempts to enter, or remains unlawfully in a vehicle that belongs to another in circumstances that do not rise to the level of, or are not pursued as, vehicle prowling charges; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to adopt a new misdemeanor of vehicle trespassing in order to combat rising levels of vehicle trespass in the City; NOW THEREFORE; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A new section 5.36.045 of the Edmonds City Code (ECC), entitled "Vehicle Trespass." is hereby added to read as follows: A. A person is guilty of vehicle trespass if he or she knowingly enters or remains in or upon a vehicle belonging to another when he or she is not licensed, invited, or otherwise privileged to so enter or remain. Packet Pg. 99 7.11.a B. As used in this section the word "enter" shall include the entrance of a person, the insertion of any part of his or her body, or any instrument or weapon held in his or her hand. C. Vehicle trespass shall be a misdemeanor punishable as provided in ECC 5.50.020. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance. APPROVED: MAYOR MICHAEL NELSON ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Im JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO. Packet Pg. 100 7.11.a SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the day of , 2023, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING SECTION 5.36.045 ECDC ENTITLED "VEHICLE TRESPASS"; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this day of 92023. CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY 3 Packet Pg. 101 7.12 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Verdant Grant Acceptance Staff Lead: Shannon Burley Department: Parks, Recreation & Human Services Preparer: Shannon Burley Background/History The Human Services Division of the City of Edmonds applied for a Grant from Public Hospital District No.2 (Verdant Health Commission) to received funds to help offset the expenses for the existing contract with Compass Health's Community Transitions Program (social worker). This effort led to a $20,000 allocation of funding to be transferred into the City's General Fund by the end of 2024. Staff Recommendation Approve contract (attached) on consent authorizing the Mayor to sign and accept funding. Narrative Staff was notified of the allocation from Verdant in September and received the contract on October 10, 2024. The contract expires at the end of December 2023. Council agendas are very full and there is no Committee Meeting in November. Due to this time constraint and the straightforward nature of the request to accept funding, Staff respectfully requests approval on Consent. Staff expects the funding to transfer to the general fund prior to the end of this calendar year as the conditions have already been met and the reporting requirement is very minimal. The expenses for the Compass Health Care Coordinator (Social Worker) are charged to the General Fund which is why this allocation, intended to offset a portion of the contract, is intended to be deposited into the General Fund. This grant is NOT associated with the Department of Commerce (DOC) Motel Voucher Grant that staff has also secured. The contracts associated with the DOC allocation are complicated and are still in legal review. Those contracts will be brought before council once a thorough review of reporting requirements has been completed. The funding for that program extends through December 2024 and therefore is less time sensative. Attachments: Verdant Contract_(S550) Packet Pg. 102 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A635OF-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a �Iverdant' HEALTH COMMISSION SERVING SOUTH SNOHOMISH COUNTY Public Hospital District No. 2, Snohomish County, Washington d/b/a Verdant Health Commission GRANT AGREEMENT NO. S550 This Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into on this day, Tuesday, October 10, 2023, by and between Public Hospital District No. 2, Snohomish County, Washington, d/b/a Verdant Health Commission ("Verdant") and City of Edmonds Human Services (the "Contractor"). In consideration of the covenants and agreements included herein, Verdant and Contractor agree as follows: d Agreement Summary: Contractor Name: City of Edmonds Human Services a Program Title: Care Coordinator Address: 700 Main Street, Edmonds, WA 98020 a Agreement Start Date: October 01, 2023 Agreement End Date: December 31, 2023 Project Grant Amount: $20,000.00 E L 1. Authority j 1.1. Verdant is authorized under RCW 70.44.240 to "contract" with any "legal entity" to "provide any hospital or other health care facilities or other health care services to be LO used by individuals, districts, Cn hospitals, or others, including providing health care maintenance services." RCW 70.44.007 UI defines "other health care services" to include "services that promote health, wellness, and prevention of illness and injury." o 1.2. Contractor is established to advance its mission: To serve Edmonds citizens that are financially, mentally or housing -stressed with support and connections to local and regional resources that can help improve their quality of life. Term This Agreement shall commence and end on the dates outlined above, unless terminated earlier, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreement. Such period shall be referred to as the "Term." 3. Scope of Work 3.1. The contractor shall provide services as defined in their project application and accepted by Verdant (hereinafter, the "Project") and achieve the outcomes as outlined below. 3.2. Project Summary: In partnership with Compass Health, the City of Edmonds recognizes the need to connect citizens with a spectrum of services including mental health and substance use treatment, medical and dental care, shelter assistance, food resources, motel vouchers, and more. Ultimately the goal is to reduce the reliance on law enforcement, local emergency rooms, and other emergency services and to manage health and safety needs sustainably through collaboration, outreach, and engagement. By partnering with the Compass Health Community Transitions Program, Edmonds can offer a full-time Care Coordinator who works directly with Human Services and the Edmonds Police Department to support their response S550 Packet Pg. 103 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A635OF-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a and assist individuals in need of these services. In addition, the Care Coordinator is meeting with clients at our south Edmonds Neighborhood Office near Hwy 99, where the needs are highest, which reduces barriers and increases access to services. This grant helps to offset the contract for the Care Coordinator and allows us to provide more services and case management to vulnerable individuals who otherwise might fall through the cracks. The Care Coordinator works with the Community Transitions team at Compass Health, so there is a solid team to support the work being done. 3.3. Annual Project Outcomes: Goal loutcomes Clients receive case management support 25-30 (per month) 3.4. Project Budget: Description Amount ($) Personnel Costs — Care Coordinator Salary $ 20,000 Direct Program Costs $ 0 Indirect Costs $ 0 Other $ 0 otal $ 20,000 4. Compensation, Method of Payment, and Budget vs. Actual Expense 4.1 Verdant shall provide funding to the Contractor -in the amount specified above for the Program per the schedule below. Funding is contingent on project deliverables having been met to date. Due Date Amount October 15, 2023 $20,000.00 4.2 The Contractor shall apply the funds received from Verdant under this Contract in accordance with the budget in Section 3. Funds must be expended by the end of the contract term and, unless otherwise approved in writing by Verdant, any unexpended funds must be returned to Verdant within 30 days of the contract end date. 4.3 The Contractor must receive prior approval from Verdant for an amendment to the approved project budget when the cumulative amount of transfers across all budget line items is expected to exceed 10% of the total contract amount by submitting a grant modification request. Supporting documents necessary to explain fully the nature and purpose of the amendment must accompany each request for an amendment. 4.4 Verdant shall have the sole and exclusive discretion to approve any requested changes and any such approved changes must be set forth in an amendment to this Contract. Verdant will accept changes to the budget and/or project summary modification requests up to 30 days 9 S550 Packet Pg. 104 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A6350E-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a before the contract end date. Smaller budget variations not exceeding the cumulative 10% rule must still be explained in bi-annual budget reports. 5. Political Activity and Lobbying Prohibited No funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or indirectly under this Contract shall be used for any partisan political activity or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office. Costs associated with lobbying at the federal, state, or local levels are not allowed under this Contract. Definitions of unallowable lobbying activities/costs are detailed in applicable Uniform Guidance and Chapter 42.17A RCW and all applicable Public Disclosure Commission materials. 6. Reporting and Evaluation Using templates provided by Verdant, Contractor shall submit reports of activities carried on under the program including summaries of outcomes and financial reports detailing use of the funds according to the schedule below: Date Due to Verdant lReport Type January 31, 2024 JAnnual Outcome, Budget, and Demographics Reports The contractor may submit a grant modification request to amend the project and deliverables of the grant agreement at any time. Contractor shall comply with requests for any additional information or reports relevant to the Contract or provision of funded services that may be requested at any time by Verdant during the Term. 7. Publicity and Materials Contractor shall acknowledge in all promotional, informational, and educational materials developed under this grant that funding was received from Verdant. Additionally, Contractor will acknowledge in any publicity given to this grant that funding was received from Verdant. Contractor shall enclose copies of any publicity or reports relevant to the Verdant -funded project with its Quarterly reports to Verdant. 8. Site Visits and Monitoring 8.1. When requested by Verdant, the Contractor shall host, at a mutually agreeable date, a virtual or in -person site visit/monitoring review during the Term. The site visit may include any combination of a review of fiscal, administrative, and programmatic components. Key personnel involved in the implementation of the Project should be available. If requested by Verdant, Contractor shall prepare a corrective action plan, implement corrective measures, and establish agreed timelines for addressing Verdant concerns. 8.2. Verdant reserves the right to audit all supporting financial documentation of grant fund expenditures. If any expenses are found to be unallowable or without justification or documentation, as determined at Verdant's sole discretion and with reference to the attached budget, Verdant reserves the right to terminate the Contract pursuant to Sectionll of this Contract and/or to require that the Contractor return to Verdant the funds issued. d c c� a am U U a c M c �a `m 5550 Packet Pg. 105 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A635OF-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a 9. Participation in Verdant Grantee Meetings and Technical Assistance Workshops Verdant is dedicated to the success of each grantee. Verdant intends to convene at least one grantee meeting and one technical assistance workshops during the Term. The Contractor agrees to send at least one representative to each meeting. Verdant will provide meeting notice at least one month in advance. 10. Subcontracting 10.1. The Contractor shall not assign or subcontract any portion of this Contract without the written consent of Verdant. Said consent must be sought in writing by the Contractor not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date of any proposed assignment. 10.2. Any subcontracted entity performing work under this Contract is subject to all the provisions and requirements of the Contract. Subcontracted entities are accountable CD = to Contractor regarding fiscal record keeping and Project activities. Contractor must enter Q. into a formal subcontract agreement with any subcontractor and such agreement must specify what services are to be provided, to whom and over what time, the line item a breakdown of each cost associated with the subcontract, reimbursement provisions, and c language which addresses compliance with all applicable regulations related to this funding source. A copy of each sub -contract agreement must be submitted to Verdant within thirty = (30) days of the proposed subcontracted activities. A subcontract is not required for procurement of goods and one-time or infrequent services. Contractor should contact L Verdant with any questions related to this term. _ 10.3. The following language must be included in all subcontracts: Subcontractor acknowledges that the contract for subcontractor's services relates to a contract between the Contractor and Verdant Health Commission. Subcontractor shall, at its sole cost and expense, protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Verdant Health Commission, its commissioners, officers, employees, and agents, from any and all demands, liabilities, causes of action, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees), claims, judgments, or awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from the acts or omissions of the subcontractor, its directors, officers, employees, or agents, relating in any way to the subcontractor's performance as it relates to the contracted matter. These indemnification obligations shall survive the termination of the contract. Subcontractor expressly agree and understand that the Verdant Health Commission is a third -party beneficiary to the contract between Contractor and subcontractor and shall have the right to bring an action against the Subcontractor to enforce the provisions of this paragraph. 11. Termination 11.1. Subject to Section 16 (Corrective Action), Verdant may terminate or suspend this Contract, in whole or in part, upon seven (7) days advance written notice to Contractor in the event that: (1) the Contractor materially breaches any duty, obligation or service required pursuant to this Contract, or (2) the duties, obligations or services required herein become impossible, illegal or not feasible. 11.2. If the termination results from any act or omission of the Contractor, including but not limited to misappropriation, nonperformance of required services, or fiscal mismanagement, the Contractor shall return to Verdant any funds, misappropriated and/or 4 S550 Packet Pg. 106 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A635OF-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a unexpended, which have been paid to the Contractor by Verdant. Contractor shall return such funds within ten (10) business days of receipt of notice of termination and request for return of funds. Funds shall be returned to Verdant by wire, certified check, or business check. 12. Compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Neither party to this Contract shall use protected health information created or shared under this Contract in any manner that would constitute a violation of HIPAA and any regulations enacted pursuant to its provisions. 13. Maintenance of Records The Contactor shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, financial, and programmatic records and other such records as may be deemed necessary by Verdant for six (6) years to ensure proper accounting for all contract funds and compliance with this Contract. Medical 1° a records shall be maintained and preserved by the Contractor in accordance with state and federal medical records statutes, and standard medical records practice. If the Contractor ceases operations a under this Contract, the Contractor shall be responsible for the disposition and maintenance of such medical records. Contractor acknowledges that records may be subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW. �a 14. Audits `m If the Contractor has an external audit, financial review, and/or Single Audit during the c LO agreement term, Contractor must submit the audit, including any management letters, to Verdant `Cn " within two weeks of issue 15. Internal Control and Accounting System 15.1 The Contractor shall establish and maintain a system of accounting and internal controls which complies with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB), or both as applicable to the Contractor's form of incorporation. 15.2 Contractor will provide reasonable stewardship of grant funds, ensuring that they are used for the purposes, and in the ways set forth, in this Agreement. 15.3 Verdant seeks to work with organizations and individuals who perform at the highest levels and who share our commitment to ethical conduct and practices. Contractor represents and agrees that: A) Contractor aspires to provide a tolerant and civil workplace that fully encourages equal employment opportunities for underrepresented groups allowable under applicable law and is free of discrimination, harassment, and misconduct. B) Contractor has in place, and enforces in accordance with their terms, policies, procedures, and practices that help ensure a tolerant and civil workplace, including, but not limited to, staff training regarding workplace misconduct, mechanisms for complaints to be made to an impartial person, fair processes for investigation and adjudication, and 5550 Packet Pg. 107 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A635OF-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a prohibitions of retaliation against persons making good faith complaints. If Verdant asks, you will provide copies of such policies and procedures as then in effect. 16. Corrective Action If Verdant determines a breach of this Contract has occurred, that is, the Contractor has failed to comply with any terms or conditions of this Contract or the Contractor has failed to provide in any manner the work or services agreed to herein, and if Verdant, in its sole discretion, deems said breach to warrant corrective action, the following sequential procedure will apply: A. Verdant will notify the Contractor in writing of the nature of the breach. The Contractor shall reply within three (3) working days of its receipt of such notification and shall indicate the steps being taken to correct the specified deficiencies. The corrective action plan shall specify the proposed completion date for bringing the Contract into compliance, which shall be no more than ten (10) days from the date of the Contractor's response, unless Verdant, at its sole discretion, specifies in writing an extension in the number of days to complete the corrective actions; B. Verdant will notify the Contractor in writing of Verdant's determination as to the sufficiency of the Contractor's corrective action plan. The determination of sufficiency of the Contractor's action plan shall be at the sole discretion of Verdant; and C. In the event the Contractor does not respond within the appropriate time with a corrective action plan, or the Contractor's corrective action plan is determined by Verdant to be insufficient, Verdant may commence termination pursuant to Section 5 of this Contract. 17. Dispute Resolution The parties shall use good -faith efforts to cooperatively resolve disputes and problems that arise in connection with this Contract. Without limiting Verdant's rights hereunder, both parties shall make a good faith effort to continue without delay to carry out their respective responsibilities under this Contract while attempting to resolve any dispute. 18. Debarment and Suspension Certification Contractor, by signature of this Contract, certifies that the Contractor are not presently debarred, suspended or proposed for debarment by any governmental entity. The Contractor agrees to notify Verdant in the event it, or a subcontractor, is debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment by any governmental entity. 19. Independent Contractor; Indemnification; Insurance 19.1. Contractor is an independent Contractor, and neither it nor its officers, agents, or employees shall be considered for any reason to be employees of Verdant for any purpose. The Contractor shall be responsible for all federal and/or state tax, industrial insurance, and Social Security liability that may result from the performance of and compensation for these services. Verdant assumes no responsibility for the payment of any compensation, wages, d V _ 2 a m a L Fa S550 Packet Pg. 108 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A635OF-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a benefits, or taxes, by, or on behalf of the Contractor, their employees, and/or others by reason of this Contract. 19.2. Contractor shall, at its cost and expense, protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Verdant Health Commission, its directors, officers, employees, and agents, from and against any and all demands, liabilities, causes of action, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees), claims, judgments, or awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting from the acts or omissions of each Contractor, its directors, officers, employees, or agents, relating in any way to the Contractor's performance under the Contract. These indemnification obligations shall survive the termination of the Contract. 19.3. The Contractor further agrees that they are financially responsible for and will repay Verdant all indicated amounts following an audit exception which occurs due to the negligence, intentional act, and/or failure, for any reason, to comply with the terms if this Contract by each Contractor, its officers, employees, agents, and/or representatives. This duty to repay Verdant shall not be diminished or extinguished by the prior termination of the Contract pursuant to the Term or Termination section. 19.4. By the first date of the Term, Contractor shall procure at its own expense and agree to maintain, for the duration of the Term, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from, or in connection with, the performance of work by Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees and/or subcontractor. Copies of certificates of insurance shall be provided to Verdant prior to contract execution. Minimum insurance includes general liability, professional liability, errors and omissions, automobile liability and workers' compensation in amounts reasonably acceptable to Verdant as determined based on the Contract. Failure by the Contractor, its agents, employees, officers, subcontractor, providers, and/or provider subcontractor to comply with the insurance requirement shall constitute a material breach of this Contract. 19.5. A copy of the Contractor's Certificate of Insurance shall be submitted to Verdant at the beginning of the Term. 20. Credentialing of Indeoendent Health Care Practitioners and Allied Health Professionals 20.1. Verdant recognizes that the provision of health care and health -related services encompasses a wide variety of providers, including licensed medical providers, community health workers, interpreters, outreach workers, etc. These individuals may be paid or contract staff and/or volunteers. 20.2. Contractor shall ensure appropriate licensure and/or credentialing exists for all health providers defined by the State of Washington as independent health care practitioners (IHCPs) and Allied Health Professionals (AHPs). IHCPs are those health care providers who, within the scope of their training, licensure, and experience, independently diagnose, initiate, alter or terminate health care treatment. IHCP providers include, but are not limited to, physicians, pathologists, dentists, nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, chiropractors and naturopaths. AHPs are health services personnel who are required to maintain a WA State license to satisfy their job requirements (e.g., pharmacists, paramedics, counselors, LPNs, social workers, and d V _ Q. m a L m Fa S550 Packet Pg. 109 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A6350E-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a acupuncturists). Contractor must conduct appropriate background checks for any non- credentialed personnel providing services under this Contract. 21. Nondiscrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity 21.1. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws regarding discrimination, including those set forth in this section. 21.2. During performance of this Contract, the Contractor agree that it will not discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, or client seeking services, because of the employee, applicant, or client's sex, race, marital status, national origin, religious affiliation, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, veteran status, or age except by minimum age and retirement provisions, unless based upon a bonafide occupational qualification. The Contractor will make equal employment opportunity efforts to ensure that .-. applicants, employees, and clients are treated equally, without regard to their sex, race, CD color, marital status, national origin, religious affiliation, disability, sexual orientation, gender Q. identity or expression, veteran status, or age. Contractor will have and enforce in accordance with their terms, policies, procedures, and practices that help ensure a tolerant and civil a workplace, including but not limited to: staff training regarding workplace misconduct; _ mechanisms for complaints to be made to an impartial person; fair processes for investigation and adjudication; and prohibitions of retaliation against persons making good = faith complaints. If Verdant asks, contractor will provide Verdant with copies of such policies and procedures then in effect. 22. Conflict of Interest The Contractor agrees to abide by generally accepted conflict of interest standards in the areas of hiring, promotion, and subcontracting. 23. Future Support Verdant makes no commitment to support the Project contracted for herein and assumes no obligation for future support of the Project except as expressly set forth in this Contract. 24. Entire Contract/Waiver of Default The parties agree that this Contract is the complete expression of the terms hereto and any oral or written representations or understanding not incorporated herein are excluded. Both parties recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Contract. Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of the Contract shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of the Contract unless stated to be such through written approval by Verdant, which shall be attached to the original Contract. 25. Grant Modification 5550 Packet Pg. 110 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A635OF-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a This Contract may not be amended or modified unless the parties agree in a separate writing, signed by both parties, and the amendment is incorporated by reference as an additional attachment to this Contract. 26. Proiect Delivered in Accordance with Law and Rule and Regulation The Contractor agrees and will require any subcontractor to agree abide by the laws of the state of Washington, rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. 27. Prohibited Uses & Repayment If any grant funds are used in ways this Agreement does not permit and that Verdant has not otherwise agreed to, contractor will notify Verdant immediately. Verdant may choose to terminate the grant pursuant to Section 5 if grant funds are used for purposes that are not considered charitable, contractor will immediately repay those funds plus, if applicable, any additional amounts necessary for Verdant to correct taxable expenditures. 28. Notice Any and all notices or other communications required or permitted to be given under any of the provisions of this Contract shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given (a) upon receipt when personally delivered, (b) sent by overnight courier or two days after deposit in the United States mail if by first class, certified or registered mail, return receipt requested; or (c) by electronic mail transmission on or before 5:00 p.m. on a business day, provided that notice sent by one of the above methods is also given that same day. All notices shall be addressed to the Parties at the addresses set forth below or at such other addresses as a Party may specify by notice to the other Party and given as provided herein: If to Verdant: Ceil Erickson Director of Community Impact grants@verdanthealth.org Verdant Health Commission 4710 196thSt. SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 If to Contractor: City of Edmonds Human Services Mindy Woods mindy.woods@edmondswa.gov 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 29. Governing Law This Contract and all amendments thereof shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington applicable to contracts made and to be performed therein, Fa S550 Packet Pg. 111 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A635OF-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a without giving effect to its conflicts of law rules or choice of law provisions. Each provision of this Agreement must be interpreted in a way that is enforceable under applicable law. If any provision is held unenforceable, the rest of the Agreement will remain in effect. 30. No Third-Partv Beneficiaries This Contract is made only to and for the benefit of the parties hereto and shall not create any rights in any other person or entity. 31. Counterparts This Contract may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same original agreement. <<Signatures on Next Page>> 10 S550 Packet Pg. 112 DocuSign Envelope ID: A5A635OF-D7B4-42EE-862C-A7F46E5BOFD4 7.12.a Verdant Health Commission DocuSigned by: Signed: rbsa, f�warh Date: 10/10/2023 Lisa E wards, Superintendent City of Edmonds Human Services Signed: Date: Mindy Woods d c c� r a am U U Q c M /L^ V E L d LO LO Cn I :.i L r O U c c� E L d E t V a 11 S550 Packet Pg. 113 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 PLN2023-0024 Rezone at 9530 & 9620 Edmonds Way Staff Lead: Amber Brokenshire Department: Planning & Development Preparer: Amber Brokenshire Edmonds Way LLC (Matt Driscoll, rep.) has applied to rezone two parcels located at 9530 and 9620 Edmonds Way from Multiple Residential - Edmonds Way (RM-EW) to Community Business - Edmonds Way (BC-EW). In 2022, Council approved a rezone of the two parcels from Multiple Residential (RM-1.5) to Multiple Residential - Edmonds Way (RM-EW) in file PLN2022-0009. According to ECDC 20.01.003, site -specific rezones are a Type IV review process where the Planning Board conducts a public hearing and makes a recommendation to City Council on whether the proposal is consistent with the rezone criteria in ECDC 20.40.010. The Council holds a closed -record review of the project and makes the final decision on the rezone request. Because this a closed -record review and the Council's decision is quasi-judicial in nature, only the information in the record may be considered by Council per ECDC 20.06.120. No new testimony or other evidence can be added to the record except any new information required to rebut the substance of any written or oral ex parte communication that is placed on the record during an appearance of fairness disclosure. The proposal was introduced to the Planning Board at their meeting on July 26, 2023. Based on feedback from the Planning Board, staff contacted Snohomish County PUD about including an additional adjacent parcel located at 9620 Edmonds Way. That site contains a PUD substation and is currently zoned RM-1.5. Including the parcel in the rezone request would not affect the existing use at 9620 Edmonds Way but would provide a more consistent zoning pattern along this portion of Edmonds Way. PUD had no objections to including their property as part of the proposal, so the boundaries of the proposed rezone were expanded (minutes from the July 26 meeting are attached and video from the meeting linked). On September 13, 2023 the Planning Board held a public hearing and after taking public testimony and deliberation concluded that the request met the criteria for a rezone in ECDC 20.40 and recommended that Council approve the request (minutes from the meeting are September 13 are attached and video from the meeting linked). Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that City Council review the Planning Board's recommendation to approve the rezone. If the Council concurs with the Planning Board's approval recommendation, direct staff to prepare an ordinance for adoption on a future consent agenda. If the Council does not agree with the recommendation, direct staff to prepare a decision describing the denial of the request. Packet Pg. 114 8.1 The BC-EW zone does not change the allowed uses but would allow for increased densities, reduced setbacks, a smaller floor area ratio, and an increased height to 40-feet for buildings fronting Edmonds Way provided that additional site development standards are applied pursuant to 16.50.020.A.3 Development on the ground floor shall consist only of commercial uses on buildings fronting Edmonds Way. The criteria to evaluate a rezone request are found in ECDC 20.40.010: A. Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The subject properties are located in the Edmonds Way Corridor comprehensive plan designation. An explicit purpose of the BC-EW zone is "to implement the policies of the Edmonds' comprehensive plan for the Edmonds Way Corridor." The compatible zoning classifications for the Edmonds Way Corridor are BP, BN, BC, or similar commercial zone and RM zones. B. Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district; The BC zone specifically notes that its purpose is to reserve areas to allow for mixed -use development which includes multiple dwelling unit(s) that support business uses. A rezone from RM- EW and RM-1.5 to BC-EW has the potential to increase density on the site, but to opt for the increased height it would require the use of sustainability and/or inclusion of affordable housing in its design which can help to achieve a variety of housing types. C. Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property; Multi -family zoning exists on the east and west sides of the subject properties. The adjacent properties to the east are developed with a combination of a duplex and single-family housing which are zoned RM-1.5 and RM-EW, and these properties could potentially be developed with multi- family housing at some point. A single-family neighborhood with an RS-8 zoning classification sits south at a higher elevation than the subject parcels. The north side of Edmonds Way contains a mix of zoning designations such as WMU, BC-EW, one RS-8 parcel and RM- 1.5. The WMU zone contains a variety of commercial developments including a gas station, bank, drive -through Starbucks, grocery stores, drug stores and other development. D. Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone, The primary change in the area and the subject property is the establishment of the Westgate Mixed Use zone in 2015. Additionally, the parcel located across Edmonds Way from the PUD substation was rezoned to BC-EW in 2017. A rezone from RM-EW and RM-1.5 to BC-EW would require additional site development standards in addition to the use of sustainable, low -impact development and/or inclusion of affordable housing in its design for an increased height, which could help promote housing diversity as well as provide ground floor commercial uses to a minimum depth of 30-feet as measured from the street front of the building. E. Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area, and parcels elsewhere with the some zoning, There has been interest in 9530 Edmonds Way over the past several years as the property is currently undeveloped. As noted above, the parcel was previously rezoned from RM-1.5 to RM-EW Packet Pg. 115 8.1 in 2022. The proposed BC-EW zoning designation reduces lot coverage and allows for smaller setbacks while allowing for the developer to opt for an increased building height with the provision of sustainability components and/or inclusion of affordable housing in its design. F. Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. Development of either site will require compliance with all development and critical area regulations. Attachments: Amended Staff Report_2023-0024_PublicHearing with attachments PLN2023-0024 Public Hearing Presentation 2023-08-23 Planning Board Public Hearing- Full Minutes 2023-09-13 Planning Board Continued Public Hearing- Full Minutes August 23, 2023 Planning Board Video Link Sept 13, 2023 Public Hearing Continued Public Hearing Video Link Packet Pg. 116 8.1.a +,7C. I S9v Xk_i We] 9411LTA [91U011 121 51" Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION ADVISORY REPORT FINDINGS, ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION To: Edmonds Planning Board From: Amber M. Brokenshire / Planner Date: September 8, 2023 File: PLN2023-0024 I. INTRODUCTION A. Application Matt Driscoll of d/Arch LLC. (applicant/contact) and Shawn Leiser (owner) have applied for a rezone on the property located at 9530 Edmonds Way (Attachments 1 - 2). The requested rezone would change the zoning of the property from Multiple Residential Edmonds Way (RM-EW) to Community Business Edmonds Way (BC-EW). The property was previously rezoned from RM-1.5 to RM-EW in 2022 under PLN2022-0009, Based on feedback provided by the Planning Board during their July 26 introduction to the proposal, City staff contacted the Snohomish County Public Utility District (PUD) about including the adjacent parcel located at 9620 Edmonds Way (Parcel Number 27033600114000) — which includes a PUD substation- as part of the rezone, so as to provide a consistent zoning pattern along this portion of Edmonds Way. The District had no objections to include their property as part of the proposal, so the boundaries of the rezone have been expanded. (Attachment 9). B. Location The properties subject to the rezone are located at 9530 Edmonds Way (Tax Parcel Number 27033600117600) and 9620 Edmonds Way (Tax Parcel Number 27033600114000). (Attachment 3). C. Review Process A site -specific rezone is a "Type IV" application, per ECDC 20.01.003. Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Board who conducts a public hearing and forwards a recommendation to the City Council. The Council holds a closed -record review of the project and makes the final decision. The application was determined complete on May 30, 2023 (Attachment 6). An initial Packet Pg. 117 8.1.a Notice of Application dated June 13, 2023 with a comment period running through June 27, 2023 was posted at the subject site, mailed to property owners with 300 feet of the site, and published in the Herald Newspaper on June 13, 2023. Documentation demonstrating compliance with the notice requirements of ECDC 20.03 are provided in Attachment 4. A Notice of Public Hearing was issued on August 9 and distributed in the same manner (Attachment 10). However, because the additional PUD parcel was included in the project scope, additional mailed notice was required to property owners within 300 feet of the PUD parcel as well. The public hearing for the proposal that was opened by the Planning Board on August 23 was continued until September 13 to allow time for additional mailed notice to be provided. A Notice of Continued Public hearing was issued on August 29, 2023 to properties within 300 feet both parcels, with a comment period running through September 13, 2023 (Attachment 10). No additional comments were received during this time. II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND ANALYSIS A. Site Context The subject parcels lie directly south off Edmonds Way with a frontage of approximately 485 feet. The properties are currently zoned RM-EW (Multiple Residential - Edmonds Way, one dwelling unit for every 1,500 square feet of lot area) and RM 1.5 (Multi -family residential, 1500 square foot lot minimum). The RM-EW zone has a height limit of 35 feet with specific conditions. The BC-EW zone contains a floor area ratio (FAR) of three (3) square feet per square foot of lot area and would allow for the maximum height of any building fronting on Edmonds Way to be increased to 40 feet with specific conditions. The Edmonds Way designation to the BC zone and specific regulations that apply to the BC-EW properties were established pursuant to Ordinance No. 3627 in part to recognize and accommodate the unique nature and physical constraints of the Edmonds Way entryway to the City of Edmonds and accommodate additional and more flexible development requirements for the Edmonds Way Corridor. B. Neighboring Development and Zoning According to city LiDAR data, the single-family (RS-8) neighborhood south of 9530 and 9620 Edmonds Way sits approximately 22 feet higher than the subject parcels, and the elevation increases as you move east. 9620 Edmonds Way contains a PUD substation that is currently zoned RM 1.5. The adjacent properties to the east are developed with a combination of a duplex and single-family housing which are zoned RM-1.5, and these properties could potentially be developed with multi -family housing at some point. The north side of Edmonds Way contains a mix of zoning designations such as WMU, BC- PLN2023-0024— Rezone Staff Report Page 2 of 9 Packet Pg. 118 8.1.a EW, one RS-8 parcel and RM- 1.5. The WMU zone contains a variety of commercial developments including a gas station, bank, drive -through Starbucks, grocery stores, drug stores and other development. B. State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) SEPA review for this site -specific rezone is exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(c) because the site is located within an urban growth area, the rezone does not require a comprehensive plan change, and the applicable comprehensive plan was previously subjected to environmental review and analysis. C. Technical Review Committee This application was reviewed by the City of Edmonds' Engineering Division staff, who determined that the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code & Engineering standards. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with future building permit application for development on the site. A transportation analysis is not required at this time and may be deferred to the future development/building permit phase of the project. Traffic studies are typically required for projects that generate at least 25 PM peak hour trips. D. Public Comments To date, one public comment has been submitted on the proposed rezone from Rachel Ross speaking for Brad and Rachel Ross and Colin and Alek Adams (Attachment 8). Ms. Ross is concerned this rezone will increase the volume and frequency of traffic entering and exiting Highway 104. Staff Response: Traffic impact studies are specific to a development application and will be reviewed by the City's Transportation Engineer. Traffic impacts are mitigated through the collection of traffic impact fees in accordance with ECC 3.36.125. At this time, there are no development applications for this property. E. Edmonds Community Development Code Compliance According to ECDC Chapter 20.40 (Rezones), the Planning Board shall review the proposed rezone and consider the following factors at a minimum: A. Comprehensive Plan. Whether the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The Comprehensive Plan map designation for the subject property is "Edmonds Way Corridor" (Attachment 6). The Comprehensive Plan has specific goals listed for the Edmonds Way Corridor as listed below. PLN2023-0024— Rezone Staff Report Page 3 of 9 Packet Pg. 119 8.1.a Commercial Development Goal E. The Edmonds Way Corridor consists of portions of Edmonds Way between the 100th Avenue West intersection and Highway 99. This corridor serves as a key transportation corridor, and also provides a key link between Edmonds and Interstate S. Established residential areas lie on both sides of the corridor. An established pattern of multiple family residential development lies along much of the corridor, while small- scale businesses can be found primarily near intersections. A major concern is that the more intensive development that occurs along the corridor should not interfere with the flow of through traffic or intrude into adjoining established communities. E.1 Permit uses in planned multiple family or small-scale business developments that are designed to minimize contributing significantly to traffic congestion. E.2 Provide for transit and pedestrian access to development. E.3 Use design review to encourage the shared or joint use of driveways and access points by development onto SR-104 in order to support the movement of traffic in a safe and efficient manner. Site access should not be provided from residential streets unless there is no feasible alternative. E.4 Use design review to ensure that development provides a transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. For uses in transitional areas adjacent to single family neighborhoods, use design techniques such as the modulation of facades, pitched roofs, stepped -down building heights, multiple buildings, and landscaping to provide designs compatible with single family development. Make use of natural topography to buffer incompatible development whenever possible The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan lists compatible zoning classifications for the different Comprehensive Plan Map designations (Attachment 6). The compatible zoning classifications for the Edmonds Way Corridor are BP, BN, BC, or similar commercial zone and RM zones. The applicant has referenced additional comprehensive plan goals and policies such as sustainability, residential development, and design objectives which are summarized here and included in the applicant's narrative as Attachment 2. The applicant has noted that a height increase provides an incentive to support and promote sustainability and provide people with a mix of housing types and styles. Additionally, the increased height should not be an impact to the adjacent RS zoned lots which are substantially higher than the subject parcels. The design objectives for site design also encourages the use of a shared access easement. PLN2023-0024— Rezone Staff Report Page 4 of 9 Packet Pg. 120 8.1.a B. Zoning Ordinance. Whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance, and whether the proposal is consistent with the purposes of the proposed zone district; According to ECDC 16.00.010, the zoning ordinance has the following purposes: A. To assist in the implementation of the adopted comprehensive plan for the physical development of the city by regulating and providing for existing uses and planning for the future as specified in the comprehensive plan; and B. To protect the character and the social and economic stability of residential, commercial, industrial and other uses within the city, and to ensure the orderly and beneficial development of those uses by: 1. Preserving and retaining appropriate areas for each type of use; 2. Preventing encroachment into these areas by incompatible uses; and 3. By regulating the use of individual parcels of land to prevent unreasonable detrimental effects of nearby uses. Finally, the Community Business (BC) zone district has its own purposes as identified in ECDC 16.50.005: A. To reserve areas for those retail stores, offices, service establishments and amusement establishments which offer goods and services to the entire community; B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings; C. To allow for mixed -use development which includes multiple dwelling units) that support business uses; D. To implement the policies of Edmonds' comprehensive plan for the Edmonds Way Corridor; E. To meet the goals of the Growth Management Act and the city of Edmonds' comprehensive plan for housing diversity and economic vitality. The subject properties are located in the Edmonds Way Corridor comprehensive plan designation. An explicit purpose of the BC-EW zone is "to implement the policies of the Edmonds' comprehensive plan for the Edmonds Way Corridor." PLN2023-0024— Rezone Staff Report Page 5 of 9 Packet Pg. 121 8.1.a The properties are encouraged to utilize a shared or joint use driveway and access points in order to reduce access onto SR-104 and make use of the natural topography of the properties to neighboring single family development. Per the project narrative a shared access would be utilized/provided between 9530 Edmonds Way and the three adjacent parcels to the east (9516, 9520, and 9524 Edmonds Way (Attachment 2). The BC zone specifically notes that its purpose is to reserve areas to allow for mixed -use development which includes multiple dwelling unit(s) that support business uses. The project narrative states a rezone on this site will allow for a mixed -use community within walking distance of existing commercial and service uses (Attachment 2). A rezone from RM-EW and RM-1.5 to BC-EW has the potential to increase density on the site, but to opt for the increased height it would require the use of sustainability and/or inclusion of affordable housing in its design which can help to achieve a variety of housing types. Rezoning the site to BC-EW is consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance. A. Surrounding Area. The relationship of the proposed zoning change to the existing land uses and zoning of surrounding or nearby property; Multi -family zoning exists on the east and west sides of the subject properties. The adjacent properties to the east are developed with a combination of a duplex and single-family housing which are zoned RM-1.5 and RM-EW, and these properties could potentially be developed with multi -family housing at some point. A single-family neighborhood with an RS-8 zoning classification sits south at a higher elevation than the subject parcels. The north side of Edmonds Way contains a mix of zoning designations such as WMU, BC-EW, one RS-8 parcel and RM- 1.5. The WMU zone contains a variety of commercial developments including a gas station, bank, drive -through Starbucks, grocery stores, drug stores and other development. The BC-EW zone allows for increased density, reduced setbacks, and allows for an increased maximum height of any building fronting Edmonds Way from 35 feet to 40 feet, provided that the development includes sustainability, low impact development and/or inclusion of affordable housing pursuant to ECDC 16.30.030.4. D. Changes. Whether there has been sufficient change in the character of the immediate or surrounding area or in city policy to justify the rezone; The primary change in the area and the subject property is the establishment of the Westgate Mixed Use zone in 2015. Additionally, the parcel located across Edmonds Way from the PUD substation was rezoned to BC-EW in 2017. PLN2023-0024— Rezone Staff Report Page 6 of 9 Packet Pg. 122 8.1.a The purposes of the zone districts are to implement the policies of the Edmonds comprehensive plan, and the BC zone specifically notes that its purpose is to meet the goals of the Growth Management Act and the city of Edmonds' comprehensive plan for housing diversity and economic vitality. A rezone from RM-EW and RM-1.5 to BC-EW would require the use of sustainable, low -impact development and/or inclusion of affordable housing in its design for an increased height, which could help promote housing diversity as well as provide ground - floor commercial uses to a minimum depth of 30-feet as measured from the street front of the building. Rezoning the site to RM-EW would be consistent with the City's policies and intent for the Edmonds Way Corridor. E. Suitability. Whether the property is economically and physically suitable for the uses allowed under the existing zoning, and under the proposed zoning. One factor could be the length of time the property has remained undeveloped compared to the surrounding area, and parcels elsewhere with the same zoning; There has been interest in 9530 Edmonds Way over the past several years as the property is currently undeveloped. As noted above, the parcel was previously rezoned from RM-1.5 to RM-EW in 2022. The proposed BC-EW zoning designation reduces lot coverage and allows for smaller setbacks while allowing for the developer to opt for an increased building height with the provision of sustainability components and/or inclusion of affordable housing in its design. Given the proximity to Edmonds Way and the elevation change of the RS zoned properties from Edmonds Way the requested rezone is a suitable zone for the subject property. F. Value. The relative gain to the public health, safety and welfare compared to the potential increase or decrease in value to the property owners. The public health, safety and welfare will not be adversely impacted by rezoning from RM-EW and RM-1.5 to BC-EW. With development of the site, any potential critical area regulations must address the critical area code as necessary. The applicant for 9530 Edmonds Way states in part the following: "The developer in opting for the 40' height increase gains flexibility in design at the expense of the optional requirements. The public gains in sustainability and/or affordable housing, which are goals of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan." Development of either site will require compliance with all development regulations which should provide protection to the public health, safety, and welfare. III. CONCLUSIONS A. The proposed rezone is consistent with the requirements of ECDC 20.40.010 as identified PLN2023-0024— Rezone Staff Report Page 7 of 9 Packet Pg. 123 8.1.a in the staff report and specifically implements policies of the Edmonds' comprehensive plan for the Edmonds Way Corridor in which the properties are located. B. Design standards within the BC-EW zone and other City of Edmonds development regulations will ensure that public health, safety and welfare is protected. IV. RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings of facts, analysis, conclusions, and attachments to this report, staff proposes that the Planning Board find the proposed rezone is consistent with the requirements of ECDC 20.40.010 and make a recommendation to the City Council to APPROVE the rezone from RM-EW and RM-1.5 to BC-EW. V. ATTACHMENTS 1. Land Use Application 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Zoning and Vicinity Map 4. Public Notice Documentation 5. Comprehensive Plan Map & Compatible Zoning Page 6. Letter of Complete Application 7. Engineering Division Comments 8. Public Comments 9. SnoPUD Email VI. PARTIES OF RECORD City of Edmonds 121 — 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Brad and Rachel Ross 22804 — 96th PI W Edmonds, WA 98020 d/SnoPUD No. 1 Mark Flury P.O. Box 1107 PLN2023-0024— Rezone Staff Report Page 8 of 9 d/Arch LLC Matt Driscoll 2412— Westlake Ave. N. Ste. 3 Seattle, WA 98109 Colin and Alek Adams 22806 — 96th PI W Edmonds, WA 98020 Packet Pg. 124 8.1.a Everett, WA 98206 PLN2023-0024— Rezone Staff Report Page 9 of 9 O E w 0 N to 06 O M LO M d C O N d N O O Cl) N O N Z J a _ d w r w 3 w Q Packet Pg. 125 Attach CITY OF EDMONDS MyBuildingPermit.com Land Use Application #1307425 - 9530 Edmonds Way Mixed -Use Applicant First Name Last Name Company Name Matt Driscoll d/Arch LLC Number Street Apartment or Suite Number E-mail Address 2412 Westlake Ave N Ste 3 mattd(Lbdarchllc.com City State Zip Phone Number Extension Seattle WA 98109 (206) 214-8839 Contractor Company Name Number Street City State License Number Project Location State Zip License Expiration Date UBI # Number Street 9530 EDMONDS WAY City Zip Code EDMONDS 98026 Associated Building Permit Number Additional Information (i.e. equipment location or special instructions). Work Location Property Owner First Name Number Street PO BOX 60216 County Parcel Number 27033600117600 Tenant Name Last Name or Company Name EDMONDS WAY LLC Apartment or Suite Number Phone Number Extension E-mail Address Floor Number Suite or Room Number Apartment or Suite Number City State Zip SHORELINE WA 98160 Certification Statement - The applicant states: certify that I am the owner of this property or the owner's authorized agent. If acting as an authorized agent, I further certify that I have full power and authority to file this application and to perform, on behalf of the owner, all acts required to enable the jurisdiction to process and review such application. have furnished true and correct information. I will comply with all provisions of law and ordinance governing this type of application. If the scope of work requires a licensed contractor to perform the work, the information will be provided prior to permit issuance. Date Submitted: 5/1/2023 Submitted By: Matt Driscoll Packet Pg. 126 Page 1 of 2 Attach CITY OF EDMONDS MyBuildingPermit.com Land Use Application #1307425 - 9530 Edmonds Way Mixed -Use Project Contact Company Name: d/Arch LLC Name: Matt Driscoll Email: mattd@darchllc.com Address: 2412 Westlake Ave N Ste 3 Phone #: (206) 214-8839 Seattle WA 98109 Project Type Activity Type Scope of Work New Rezone Rezone to Any Other Zone Project Name: 9530 Edmonds Way Mixed -Use Description of Work: Rezone parcel from RM-EW to BC-EW Project Details Project Information Zoning - existing Zoning - requested RM-EW BC-EW Packet Pg. 127 Page 2 of 2 I 8.1.a I City of Edmonds Land Use Application ❑ ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW • ' • ❑ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ❑ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FILE # ZONE ❑ HOME OCCUPATION DATE REC'D BY ❑ FORMAL SUBDIVISION ❑ SHORT SUBDIVISION FEE RECEIPT # ❑ LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT HEARING DATE ❑ PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ❑ OFFICIAL STREET MAP AMENDMENT HE ❑ STAFF ❑ PB ❑ ADB ❑ CC ❑ STREET VACATION ❑ REZONE ❑ SHORELINE PERMIT ❑ VARIANCE / REASONABLE USE EXCEPTION ❑ OTHER: • PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED WITHIN THE APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC RECORD • PROPERTY ADDRESS OR LOCATION PROJECT NAME (IF APPLICABLE) PROPERTY OWNER PHONE # ADDRESS E-MAIL FAX # TAX ACCOUNT # SEC. TWP. RNG. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR PROPOSED USE (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) DESCRIBE HOW THE PROJECT MEETS APPLICABLE CODES (ATTACH COVER LETTER AS NECESSARY) APPLICANT PHONE # ADDRESS E-MAIL FAX # CONTACT PERSON/AGENT PHONE # ADDRESS E-MAIL FAX # The undersigned applicant, and his/her/its heirs, and assigns, in consideration on the processing of the application agrees to release, indemnify, defend and hold the City of Edmonds harmless from any and all damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising from any action or infraction based in whole or part upon false, misleading, inaccurate or incomplete information furnished by the applicant, his/her/its agents or employees. By my signature, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that I am authorized to file this application on the behalf of the owner as listed below. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT/AGENT DATE Property Owner's Authorization I, , certify under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the following is a true and correct statement: I have authorized the above Applicant/Agent to apply for the subject land use application, and grant my permission for the public officials and the staff of the City of Edmonds to enter the subject property for the purposes of inspection and posting attendant to this application. SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE Questions? Call (425) 771-0220. Revised on 8122112 B - Land Use Application A. Land Use application - 9530 Edmonds Way Rezone Page I of 1 Packet Pg. 128 Attach 28 April 2023 City of Edmonds Permitting and Planning Division 121-5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Rezone Application for 9530 Edmonds Way to BC-EW This application to rezone 9530 Edmonds Way from RM-EW to BC-EW. We are submitting the following in support of this rezone: A. Land Use Application (attached) B. Narrative describing how rezone satisfies the requirements of the Edmonds Community Development code and Comprehensive Plan (see below) C. Scale Map of 9530 Edmonds Way (attached) D. Vicinity Map of 9530 Edmonds Way (attached) E. Environmental Checklist (SEPA) for 9530 Edmonds Way Rezone Packet Pg. 129 Attach B. REZONE NARRATIVE 9530 Edmonds Way CONTENTS SUMMARY 1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2. ZONING ORDINANCE 3. SURROUNDING AREA 4. CHANGE 5. VALUE SUMMARY We're requesting a rezone of one parcel of land at 9530 Edmonds Way from RM-EW to BC-EW. (Tax Acct #270336001176001) This rezone is in keeping with the policies and goals of the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan (Revision Date: May 18, 2021), which designates the parcel as Edmonds Way Corridor. This rezone is in compliance with the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code (ECDC) which is current through Ordinance 4235, passed October 12, 2021. This rezone to BC-EW allows commercial uses (ECDC 16.50.010) which are not allowed in the current RM-EW Zone (ECDC 16.30.010). This rezone to BC-EW modifies the Site Development Standards of the parcel from the RM-EW Standards (ECDC 16.30.030) to the BC-EW Standards (ECDC 16.50.020).t As in the current RM-EW Zone, the rezone to BC-EW allows the developer to opt for a higher height limit. In this case, 40' instead of 25' with conditions as stated in ECDC 16.50.020.Table A. 2 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 130 Attach COMPREHENSIVE This rezone to BC-EW is consistent with the City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. See below The City of • • •s Comprehensive Plan Map, Revision I.2021,designates site as Edmonds Way Corridor. Which is indicated for Mixed -Use Development. � � ■.■�:■■ - �� ■ all Madrona K-8 School Form r Flementary .� � �■ 1 i r ' i 1'1 C � � �aimi ate/ ■■ ■ ■ 1� ►i�i's ►•�•• • ,�i� : •i�i•� �•�• �i ••� •�i�i �i�i�i�i�i••��ii�� ►�i�i�i �i�i�i�i'�'��i�i4 1 • ••• •�•� i•�•i•Edmonds Way C• •• • • •s Way Corridor ::6Md COMPREHENSIVE•SCOPE The Comprehensive Plan has the following purposes: B. Rezone Narrative - 9530 Edmonds Way 3 Packet Pg. 131 Attach • To provide a framework for moving the Edmonds community toward a sustainable future that integrates and responds to environmental, economic, and social needs in a way which "meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." • To promote the public health, safety, and welfare consistent with the values of the community. • To serve as the basis for municipal policy on land use and development and to provide guiding principles and objectives for the development of regulations and programs that support sustainable development within the city while seeking to conserve, protect, and enhance the community's assets and natural resources. • To anticipate and influence the orderly and coordinated development of land and building use of the city and its environs, and conserve and restore natural beauty and other natural resources. • To encourage coordinated development and discourage piecemeal, spot or strip zoning and inharmonious subdividing. • To facilitate adequate provisions for public services such as transportation, police and fire protection, water supply, sewage treatment, and parks. • To facilitate the provision of sustainable public services consistent with the community's values and needs. Growth Management Goals & Policies A.3. The role of commercial and industrial enterprises, the attendant tax base and provision for consumer needs should be considered as a supporting part of achieving a sustainable community. A.4. Any growth or development should strive to preserve for itself and its neighbors the following values: A.4.a Light (including direct sunlight) A.4.b Privacy A.4.c Public views, open spaces, shorelines and other natural features. A.4.d Freedom from air, water, noise, and visual pollution. A.5. Any residential growth should be designed to accommodate and promote a balanced mixture of income and age groups. The rezone from to BC-EW will have a positive effect on the property's tax base, as well as creating more opportunity for diverse housing types. It will not affect any public views. State Framework Goals Urban Growth — Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public services and facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. Reduce Sprawl — Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling low - density development. Housing — Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. The rezone of this site, which has adequate public services and facilities, will encourage development on this undeveloped site with a density appropriate to its location, as well as creating more opportunity for diverse housing types. Regional Goals Development Patterns — focus growth within already urbanized areas to create walkable, compact and transit -oriented communities. 4 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 132 Attach Housing — The region will preserve, improve, and expand its housing stock to provide a range of affordable, healthy, and safe housing choices to every resident. The region will continue to promote fair and equal access to housing for all people. The rezone of this site to BC-EW will encourage development within this already urbanized area and is within walking distance of Westgate Village. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — ELEMENTS Sustainability Goals & Policies Sustainability Goal A. Develop land use policies, programs, and regulations designed to support and promote sustainability. Encourage a mix and location of land uses designed to increase accessibility of Edmonds residents to services, recreation, jobs, and housing. Sustainability Goal E. Develop economic development policies, programs, and regulations designed to support co -location of jobs with housing ... and encourage business activities that supplement traditional businesses and employment concentrations. Sustainability Goal G. Develop housing policies, programs, and regulations designed to support and promote sustainability. Support and encourage a mix of housing types and styles which provide people with affordable housing choices geared to changes in lifestyle. The rezone to BC-EW allows an increase in density and the provision of commercial space which supports the goals above. The housing provides an opportunity for more residents to stay in the community. Climate Change Goals and Policies Climate Change Goal E. Encourage Existing land use. Buildings and infrastructure to reduce their carbon footprint. The rezone to BC-EW will allow a higher -density building to be constructed that meets current energy codes, facilitates by location alternative means of transportation, and provides sustainable features yielding a reduction in housing unit carbon footprint. Environmental Quality Goals & Policies Environmental Quality Goal A. Protect environmental quality within the Edmonds community through the enforcement of community -based environmental regulations that reinforce and are integrated with relevant regional, state, and national environmental standards. The rezone to BC-EW will allow a potentially taller building that provides features enhancing the environmental quality such as Low Impact Development (LID) Residential Development Goal & Policies Residential Goal A. High quality residential development which is appropriate to the diverse lifestyle of Edmonds residents should be maintained and promoted. A.3 Minimize encroachment on view of existing homes by new construction... A.5 Protect residential areas from incompatible land uses... A.6 Require that new residential development be compatible... natural constraints... The rezone to BC-EW will limit building height to an elevation below the living levels of existing single-family residences to the South. Its orientation towards Edmonds Way is not incompatible with those residences that are accessed from 231It PI. SW. Development on the site will fit and be constrained by the existing natural features. 5 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 133 Attach Residential Goal B. A broad range of housing types and densities should be encouraged in order that a choice of housing will be available to all Edmonds residents. B.2 Multiple. The City's development policies encourage sustainable high -quality site and building design to promote coordinated development and to preserve the trees, topography and other natural features of the site. Stereotyped, boxy multiple unit residential (RM) buildings are to be avoided. B.2.a Location Policies. B.2.a.i. RM uses should be located near arterial or collector streets. B.2.b Compatibility Policies. B.2.b.i RM developments should preserve the privacy and view of surrounding buildings, wherever feasible. B.2.b.ii The height of RM buildings that abut single family residential (RS) zones shall be similar to the height permitted in the abutting RS zone except where the existing vegetation and/or change in topography can substantially screen one use from another. The adjacent RS zoned lots (9529 & 9515-231st PI SW) uphill of the site proposed for rezone are substantially higher than the increased height available through the rezone. Additionally, there is a substantial amount of vegetative growth at the southern portion of 9530 Edmonds Way and the northern side of the closest RS zoned lots. B.2.b.iiiThe design of RM buildings located next to RS zones should be similar to the design idiom of the single family residence. B.2.c. General Design Policies. B.2.c.i The nonstructural elements of the building (such as decks, lights, rails, doors, windows and window easements, materials, textures and colors) should be coordinated to carry out a unified design concept. B.2.c.ii Site and building plans should be designed to preserve the natural features (trees, streams, topography, etc.) of the site rather than forcing the site to meet the needs of the imposed plan. A building on the rezoned site will have no visual relationship with the uphill single-family residences. Because of the slope of 9530 Edmonds Way, development would likely be at the bottom of the slope closer to Edmonds Way preserving some trees uphill and fitting into the slope. Commercial Land Use Goals & Policies Commercial Development Goal A. Commercial Development in Edmonds shall be located to take advantage of unique opportunities while being consistent with and compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The site is identified in the Comprehensive Plan as Edmonds Way Corridor for mixed -use development. The site shares access off Edmonds Way with one curb cut shared with the three parcels to the East. The two parcels directly across Edmonds Way are zoned BC-EW Commercial Development Goal B. The Westgate Commercial area, which is nearby and to the West of this site is intended for commercial development and services. The rezone of this site will support many of the goals identified as being important for the Westgate Commercial Area Commercial Development Goal C. Neighborhood Commercial areas are intended to provide a mix. 6 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 134 Attach Rezoning this site will allow a mixed -use project without creating a `strip mall.' It would allow an appealing mixed -use community within walking distance of shopping and service. Commercial Development Goal D. This goal references the Westgate Corridor which starts West at 100th Ave W. Rezoning this site will allow a project that would meet several goals identified in this policy such as shared access. Commercial Development Goal E. This site is in the Edmonds Way Corridor which runs from 100th Ave W to Highway 99. Concern is expressed that development along the corridor should not interfere with the flow of traffic or intrude into adjoining residential communities. E.1 Minimize contributing significantly to traffic congestion. E.2 Provide transit and pedestrian access to development. E.3 Encourage shared use of driveways and access points EA Encourage design and use of topography to buffer development with adjacent communities Rezoning this site will allow a mixed -use community within walking distance of shopping and service. Additionally, the shared driveway and the effects of the topography meet these goals. Housing Goals & Policies Housing Goal F. Provide for a variety of housing that respects the established character of the community and is located according to the Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Element. Rezoning this site is in keeping with the pattern of development in the Edmonds Way Corridor. Housing Goal J. Recognize that in addition to traditional height and bulk standards, design is an important aspect of housing and determines, in many cases, whether it is compatible with its surroundings. Design guidelines for housing should be integrated, as appropriate, into the policies and regulations governing the location and design of housing. J.1. Provide design guidelines that encourage flexibility in housing types while ensuring compatibility of housing with the surrounding neighborhood. Rezoning the site to BC-EW will be consistent with this goal. Urban Design Goals & Policies General Design Objectives Design Objectives for Site Design. The development of parking lots, pedestrian walkways and landscaping features is an integral part of how a building interacts with its site and its surrounding environment. Good design and site planning improves access by pedestrians, bicycles and automobiles, minimizes potential negative impacts to adjacent development, reinforces the character and activities within a district and builds a more cohesive and coherent physical environment. A.1 Vehicular Access. Reduce the number and width of driveways (curb cuts) in order to improve pedestrian, bicycle and auto safety. 9530 Edmonds Way and the three lots to the East share an access easement from Edmonds Way. There will be only one curb cut on Edmonds Way. A.2 Layout of Parking. Locating buildings in proximity to the street to facilitate direct pedestrian access and help define the street edge. Parking should be placed to the side and rear. Rezoning the site will require buildings on the site to be located close to Edmonds Way. Parking will be garaged and partially underground due to the BC-EW Site Development Standards and the topography. 7 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 135 Attach A.3 Connections On- and Offsite. Design site access and circulation within and between sites to encourage linkages for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. Special attention should be paid to providing and improving connections to transit. The common access from Edmonds Way will tie the circulation between the sites creating a pedestrian, vehicular and bicycle linkage to Edmonds Way A.4 Building Entry Location. Building entries should be configured to provide clear entry points to buildings, be oriented to pedestrian walkways/pathways, and support the overall intent of the streetscape environment. Space at the entry for gathering or seating is desirable for residential or mixed -use buildings. The common access from Edmonds Way will create a clear entry and departure point for vehicles and pedestrians. Internal circulation will support the `streetscape' by extending circulation into the project. Sharing the single driveway provides opportunities for seating or shared space. A.5 Setbacks. Create and maintain the landscape and site characteristics of each neighborhood area and provide a common street frontage tying each site to its neighbor. Setbacks should be appropriate to the desired streetscape, providing for transition areas between public streets and private building entries where a variety of activities and amenities can occur. The setback on this parcel and 9516 Edmonds Way will match because of the constraint of the overhead power line and the Development Standards. Both will provide a landscape transition to the activity of Edmonds Way. A.6 Open Space. For residential settings, create green spaces to enhance the visual attributes of the development and provide places for interaction, play, seating, and other activities. The constraints of maximum building size, required parking, vehicular and fire access will work to provide open space. Goals A.7 through A.13 will inform good design on the site. A.7 Building/Site Identity. Improve pedestrian access and way -finding by providing variety in building forms, colors, materials and individuality of buildings. A.8 Weather Protection. Provide covered walkways and entries for pedestrian weather protection. A.9 Lighting. Provide adequate and appropriate illumination in all areas used by automobiles, bicycles and pedestrians — including building entries, walkways, parking areas, circulation areas and other open spaces — to support activity and security. A.10 Signage. Encourage signage that provides clear information and direction for properties and businesses while preventing the streetscape from becoming cluttered. Encourage the use of graphics and symbols in signage to support the city's emphasis on uniqueness and the arts. A.11 Site Utilities, Storage, Trash and Mechanical Systems. Minimize the noise, odor and visual impacts of utility systems using such features as landscaping, building forms, or integrated design. A.12 Integrating Site Features. Integrate natural landscape features and unique landforms — such as rocky outcroppings or significant trees — into site design whenever possible. A.13 Landscape Buffers. Use landscaping and/or other features such as fences to maintain privacy and create a visual barrier between incompatible uses. These buffering techniques should also be used to soften hard edges (such as the perimeters of parking lots) and reinforce pedestrian ways and circulation routes. Native plants and rain gardens should be promoted as alternatives to lawns and runoff retention areas. The constraints of maximum building size, required parking, vehicular and fire access will work to provide open space. Goals A.7 through A.13, as we'll as the City Code and Design Review, will inform good design on the site. Design Objectives for Building Form. Building height and modulation guidelines are essential to create diversity in building forms, minimize shadows cast by taller buildings upon the pedestrian areas and to ensure compliance s B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 136 Attach with policies in the city's Comprehensive Plan. Protecting views from public parks and building entries as well as street views to the mountains and Puget Sound are an important part of Edmonds character and urban form. A.14 Building Form. Encourage new construction to avoid repetitive, monotonous building forms. A.15 Massing. Reduce the apparent bulk and mass of buildings by encouraging human scale elements in building design and/or by subdividing building masses vertically or horizontally. A.16 Roof Modulation. Use roof forms to help identify different programs or functional areas within the building and support differentiation of building form and massing. Roof design, in combination with wall modulation, can allow for additional light to enter buildings or pedestrian spaces. A.17 Wall Modulation. Variation in materials, decorative elements, or other features should be employed to support pedestrian scale environments and streetscapes, or to help break up large building masses to keep in scale with the surrounding environment. Design Objectives for Building Fagade. Building fagade objectives ensure that the exterior of a building — the portion of a building that defines the character and visual appearance of a place — is of high quality and demonstrates the strong sense of place and integrity valued by the residents of the City of Edmonds. A.18 Building Fagade Design. Encourage building fagades that reinforce the appearance and consistency of streetscape patterns while supporting diversity and identity in building design. A.19 Window Variety and Articulation. Use window size and placement to help define the scale and character of the building. Use the organization and combinations of window types to reinforce the streetscape character or to provide variation in a fagade, as well as provide light and air to the building interior. A.20 Variation in Fagade Materials. Employ variation in materials, colors or design elements on building fagades to help define the scale and style of the structure. Variation in fagade materials can help reduce the apparent bulk of larger buildings while allowing variety and individuality of building design. The constraints of a mixed -use building with its requirements for light and air to the residential units and visibility and openness for the commercial space will direct adherence to these goals. The varying uses will structure the building masses both vertically and horizontally and direct fagade differences that meet goals A.14 through A.20. Urban Design Goals & Policies for Specific Areas Streetscape and Street Trees Goals & Policies Streetscape and Street Trees Goal A. Enhance the public realm through streetscape and street tree choices. Through the development of this parcel and 9516 Edmonds Way to the East, the streetscape will be improved. Storm & Surface Water System Goals & Policies Storm and Surface Water Management Goal A. Manage the storm and surface water system by combining preservation of natural systems and engineered solutions to: • Provide for public safety; • Minimize property damage; • Preserve and enhance critical areas; • Promote sustainability; • Comply with applicable local, state, and Federal regulations. 9 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 137 Attach The term low impact development (LID) refers to systems and practices that use or mimic natural processes that result in the infiltration, evapotranspiration or use of stormwater in order to protect water quality and associated aquatic habitat. This rezone to BC-EW will encourage Low Impact Development through the allowable height provisions of the BC-EW Zoning. 10 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 138 Attach 2. ZONING ORDINANCE This rezone to BC-EW is consistent with the Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code. See below. The Edmonds City Code and Community Development Code is current through Ordinance 4294, passed February 28, 2022. The City of Edmonds Zoning Plan Map, Revision Date: August 3, 2022, designates 9530 Edmonds Way as RM-EW i i i z e 9530 Edmonds Way- " todway A PRo2000. 2�.-I Madrona • K-R Inhonl Multi Family RM 3 Multi Family. 3,000 sq. ft. of lot area Per unit RM 2.4 Muir$ Famllg 2.400 sq. ft. of lot area Per unit _ RM. 1,5 Multi Family, f, 500 sq. ft. of lot a,— Per unit I- RM-CW Multi Family. RMddmonds Way Commercial WMU Westgate Mixed Use BP Planned Business BN Neighborhood Business ® FVMU Fociale Village Mixed Use - BC Community Business - BC EW Comrnum ty Business. BC -Edmonds Wuy Cu General Commercial B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way 11 Packet Pg. 139 Attach Title 16 ZONE DISTRICTS 16.00.010 Purposes states that in addition to the purposes stated in the city's comprehensive plan, the zoning ordinance shall have the purpose to assist in the implementation of the adopted comprehensive plan for regulating and providing for existing uses and planning for the future. It further states that the zoning ordinance's purpose is to protect the character and the social and economic stability of residential, commercial, industrial and other uses within the city, and to ensure the orderly and beneficial development of those uses by: 1. Preserving and retaining appropriate areas for each type of use; 2. Preventing encroachment into these areas by incompatible uses; and 3. By regulating the use of individual parcels of land to prevent unreasonable detrimental effects of nearby uses. 16.50 BC — COMMUNITY BUSINESS 16.50.005 Purposes The BC and BC -Edmonds Way zones have the following specific purposes in addition to the general purposes for business and commercial zones: A. To reserve areas for... offices... which offer... services to the entire community; B. To ensure compact, convenient development patterns by allowing uses that are operated chiefly within buildings; C. To allow for mixed -use development which includes multiple dwelling units that support business uses: D. To implement the policies of Edmonds' Comprehensive Plan for the Edmonds Way Corridor; E. To meet the Growth Management Act and the City of Edmonds' Comprehensive plan for housing diversity and economic vitality This rezone to BC-EW is fully in keeping with each of the above stated purposes. 16.50.010 Uses Permitted Primary Uses include offices and multiple dwelling units (except on ground floor per ECDC 16.50.020(B). Permitted Secondary Uses include off-street parking and loading to serve a permitted use. 12 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 140 Attach 16.50.020 Site Development Standards A Table Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Street Side Rear Maximum Maximum Floor Lot Area Lot Width Setback Setback Setback Height Area BC None None None None' None' 25,2 3 s q. ft. per sq. ft. of lot area BC— None None 10, None' None' 25i3 3 sq. ft. per sq. Edmonds ft. of lot area Way ' The setback for buildings and structures located at or above grade (exempting buildings and structures entirely below the surface of the ground) shall be 15 feet from the lot line adjacentto residentially (R) zoned property. The required setback shall be completely [an dscaped with Type I Ian escaping permanently maintained by the owner of the BC -zoned lot. s Roof only may extend five feet above the stated height limit if all portions of the roof above the stated height are modulated in design and are designed as a hip, gable, arch, shed or other similar roof form (see illustrations). Vertical parapet walls or flat roofs with a pitch of less than three-in-12 are not allowed to protrude above the 25-foot height limit unless they are part of an approved modulated design. Examples of Modulated Root Designs how P. ����, rr�■ .ter — ® 0 I!!lill Will I!!e 'ar�i Wl 7 The stated height limit may be increased to 40 feet; provided, that: (a) The street setback of art/ proposed building shall be increased to 15 feet in depth. Type III landscaping shall be located within this setback; (b) Where the proposed development abuts a single-family residential (IRS) zoned property, in addition to complying with subsection (a) of this footnote, the proposed development shall modulate the design of any building facades facing the single-family residentially (RS) zoned property; (c) At least three of the following techniques shall be incorporated into the building and/or site's design: (1) Achievement of least LEED gold certification or comparable green building certification; (2) Inclusion of housing units affordable to persons at low/moderate income as determined by Snohomish County Tomorrow. The number of affordable units must beat least 15 percent of the gross number of units proposed; (3) Public amenities within an area comprising at least 25 percent of the length of any required street setback such as outdoor seating, plazas, walkways or other usable open space. The remainder of the setback area will be landscaped with Type III landscaping; (4) Low impact development (LID) techniques are employed. LID best management practices include, but are not limited to: bioretention/rain gardens, permeable pavements, roof downspout controls, dispersion, soil quality and depth, minimal excavation foundations, vegetated roofs, and water re -use. (d) Seventy-five percent of a building facade facing a public right-of-way shall be clad with preferred building materials which include natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass. Concrete, laminates, veneers, fiber cement products and the like may be permitted if they replicate the appearance of the listed preferred materials. At least 55 percent of building facade materials must be salvaged, recycled content, bio-based or indigenous. 13 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 141 Attach B. Ground Floor. Development on the ground floor shall consist of only uses to a minimum of 30' measured from the street front of the building C. See Parking (Chapter 17.50 ECDC), Design Review (Chapter 20.10 ECDC), and Sign Code (Chapter 20.60 ECDC) for additional standards. The following design standards shall also apply to buildings within the BC-EW zone: 1. Massing and Articulation a. Intent. To reduce the massiveness and bulk of large box -like buildings and articulate the building from a pedestrian perspective b. Standards. Buildings shall convey a visually distinct base and top. A "base" can be emphasized by a different masonry pattern, more architectural detail, visible plinth above which the wall rises, storefront, canopies, or a combination. The top edge is highlighted by a prominent cornice, projecting parapet or other architectural element that creates a shadow line. 2. Ground Level Details. a. Intent. To reinforce the character of the streetscape by encouraging the greatest amount of visual interest along the ground level of buildings facing Edmonds Way b. Standards. Ground -floor street -facing facades of commercial and mixed -use buildings shall incorporate at least five of the following elements: lighting or hanging baskets; medallions; belt courses; plinths for columns; bulkhead for storefront window; projecting sills; tile work; transom or clerestory windows; planter box; an element not listed here that meets the intent as approved by the Architectural Design Review Board 3. Treating Blank Walls a. Intent. To ensure that buildings do not display blank, unattractive walls b. Standards. Walls or portions of walls on abutting streets or visible from residential areas where windows are not provided shall have architectural treatment. At least five of the following elements shall be incorporated into such walls: Masonry (except flat, nondecorative block); concrete or masonry plinth at bas of wall; belt course of a different texture and color; projecting cornice; decorative tile work; medallions; opaque or translucent glass; artwork or wall graphics; lighting fixture; green walls; an element not listed here that meets the intent as approved by the Architectural Design Review Board 16.50.030 Operating Restrictions A. Enclosed Building. All uses shall be carried out entirely within a completely enclosed building B. Nuisances. All uses shall comply with Chapter 17.60 ECDC, Property Performance Standard 1. Seventy-five percent of a building facade facing a public right-of-way shall be clad with preferred building materials which include natural stone, wood, architectural metal, brick and glass. Concrete, laminates, veneers, fiber cement products and the like may be permitted if they replicate the appearance of the listed preferred materials. At least 55 percent of building facade materials must be salvaged, recycled content, bio-based or indigenous. C. Location of Parking. No parking spaces may be located within the street setback. 14 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 142 Attach Title 17 GENERAL ZONING REGULATIONS Chapter 17.50 OFF-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS 17.50.020 Parking Space Requirements A. Residential. 1. Single-family and multifamily. a. Single-family dwellings: two spaces per dwelling unit, except: b. Multiple residential according to the following table: Type of multiple dwelling unit Required parking spaces per dwelling unit Studio 1.2 1 bedroom 1.5 2 bedrooms 1.8 3 or more bedrooms 2.0 B. Commercial 4. Medical/Dental offices: one space per 200 sf 5. Business and professional offices with on -site customer service: one space per 400 sf 6. Offices not providing on -site customer service: one space per 800 sf Chapter 17.115 ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE 17.115.040 Required Facilities Table 17.115.040: Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Requirements Number of EV Capable Number of EV Ready Number of EV Installed Type of Use Parking Spaces Parking Spaces Parking Spaces Single-family dwelling N/A 1 per dwelling unit N/A units' Multiple dwelling units' 40% of parking spaces 40% of parking spaces 10% of parking spaces Nonresidential uses 40% of parking spaces 0% of parking spaces 10% of parking spaces Chapter 17.120 BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES 17.115.040 Required Facilities Table 17.120-1: Short -Term Bicycle Parking Requirements Type of Use Minimum Number of Spaces Required Multiple dwelling units 1 per 10 dwelling units; not less than 2 spaces Nonresidential uses 1 per 12 vehicle parking spaces; not less than 2 spaces 15 B. Rezone Narrative - 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 143 Attach Table 17.120-2: Long -Term Bicycle Parking Requirements Minimum Number of Spaces Number of E-bike Installed Type of Use Required Spaces Multiple dwelling units' 0.75 per unit 40 percent of spaces Nonresidential uses 2 per 25,000 square feet of floor 10 percent of spaces area; not less than 3 spaces Title 20 REVIEW CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES Chapter 20.10 DESIGN REVIEW 20.10.010 Types of Design Review The project will be subject to General Design Review per the ECDC. Chapter 20.60 SIGN CODE The project will be subject to the Sign Code per the ECDC. Title 23 NATURAL RESOURCES Chapter 23.10 TREE RELATED REGULATIONS 20.10.010 Administrative Authority The Development Services Director or a designee shall have the authority and rersponsibility to administer and enforce all provisions of this chapter 20.10.060 Tree Retention Associate with Development Activity The City's objective is to retain as many viable trees as possible on a developing site while still allowing a feasible development proposal to move forward in a timely manner. To that end, the City requires approval of a tree retention and protection plan. 16 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 144 Attach 3. SURROUNDING AREA The City of Edmonds Zoning Plan Map, Revision Date: August 3, 2022, designates 9530 Edmonds Way as RM-EW d� PL SW r1 Y Z30M e'� Z 0 150 300ft Zoning The proposed rezone of the site to BC-EW will be compatible with the existing zoning and land use of adjacent sites. To the West, the RM-1.5 parcel is a PUD Substation and will not change in the foreseeable future. To the south, the RS-8 zone is up a steep slope and about 30'-40' higher than 9530 Edmonds Way. To the East of the site in the RM-1.5 Zone, there are currently two houses. Access to 9530 Edmonds Way will come from the shared easement with 9516 Edmonds Way and turn West on to 9530 Edmonds Way. This will create further separation 17 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 145 Attach between a project on the site and those two houses. The RM-EW parcel to the East at 9516 Edmonds Way is being developed as eight townhouse units. SW V. "o`fi' '"` 22804 M c �t GAS r27 co ��_ X N 1 \ 9715 °' a�.. ,'o �' L 9620 d !� ----��1 _ 2300.323001 - - - - r a► N w 23009 ZO D - W r 9ca G 23014 Q l 23017 !V 9629 4- 23024?28 = 23027 9WI Qti SSOg 23030 960in 9 y't 9s? D 9507 9717 9707 c� in 0 o c� 231ST PL SW i 23109 9610 9716 9706 .., Addresses/Vehicular Circulation 9530 Edmonds Way cD m co There are no direct vehicle connections from 9530 Edmonds Way to the residential neighborhood to the South. The rezone to BC-EW will not change this. A •A B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way 18 Packet Pg. 146 Attach El. 338' per �• survey •• • • r P 07 El. 334' per i� survey ■ 9 2C El. 34-9 per �-survey �. 0 50 100ft Topography 9530 Edmonds Way Assuming an approximate average grade for a project on 9530 Edmonds Way of el. 340'. A 40' high building, allowed under the proposed BC-EW Zone, will only be as high as the top of slope on the adjacent single-family properties to the South. It would be approximately 65' away from the houses and separated by trees and other vegetation. 19 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 147 Attach • ��• ��� i PD15- 7 v' '• ; �� � . � . 9530 Edmonds Way �7 20' PUD Easement �• 20' Shared Access i Easement ■ • ■ • ■ •• Approximate center .............r . : location of 10' Edmonds 23017V 3027 7DU7tL 0 s0 100ft Stormwater & Easements t rr 0 O, Stormwater from the uphill residential lots to the South apparently flows through the 9530 Edmonds Way site in a City of Edmonds 10' Easement. Development on 9530 Edmonds Way will have to relocate this easement and, in the process, improve the drainage. This is a benefit to the uphill neighbors and the city by creating a more controlled flow. Access to 9530 Edmonds Way will be in the shared access easement on the west side of 9516 Edmonds Way. 9520 and 9524 Edmonds Way will benefit from the improvement of this single access point. 20 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 148 Attach 9620 f 0 P 21V 0 • ,• r 9530 Edmonds Way - � w< • '---------- OIVMPM View W-a lIL .7 EM 1 10 1 �� 96J9r� r ndsv.. IY 0 50 100ft Water Service Water service connects the uphill residential lots to Edmonds Way through an easement to the East of 9530 Edmonds Way. The rezone to BC-EW will not affect this. 21 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 149 Attach LL. NSI'SW 287H PLSW 0 150 300ft Critical Areas I. Id �I 9530 Edmonds Way, ■ r dF 228THS'SM r = r Mapped Critical �, �� �Lj Areas (colored areas) �- L OilASI Department of Natural Resources (DNF There are a few minor mapped critical areas on the 9530 Edmonds Way site. Uphill to the South of the site there are more substantial steep slopes and slide hazard areas mapped on the single-family lots. Development on the 9530 Edmonds Way site through this rezone may help to stabilize the uphill properties. 22 B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way Packet Pg. 150 Attach 4. CHANGE The City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Map, Revision Date: May 18, 2021, designates the site as Edmonds Way Corridor. Which is indicated for Mixed -Use Development. This rezone of 9530 Edmonds Way will allow the site to build a mixed -use project in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan. Property across Edmonds Way is currently zoned BC-EW. 5. SUITABILITY The property is economically and physically suitable for mixed -use under the proposed BC-EW Zone. Its size of 36,375 sf (0.835 acres) is large enough to develop an economically feasible mixed -use project. It is topographically separated and screened by vegetation from adjacent IRS zones. The site is on Edmonds Way keeping the mixed -use traffic out of the IRS neighborhoods. The site is proximate to the Westgate Commercial Center. a a _�, �2�32SS �NND �-T SSW—�� 1 Commercial WMU Westgate Mixed Use BP Planned Business BN Neighborhood Business FVMU Firdole Wlloge Mixed Use - BC Community Business - BC-EW Community Business. BC -Edmonds Way !. CG General Commercial B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way I Packet Pg. 151 Attach 6. VALUE The relative gain to the public interest value is commensurate with the relative gain to the developer. The mixed -use development allowed by this rezone will provide development in an area designated by the city for this type of development. There is an increase in the density for the developer. The developer, if opting for the increase to 40' height gains flexibility in design by providing the optional requirements. The infill development resulting from this rezone will increase housing diversity in the community and raise the site's tax basis.The public gains in sustainability and housing, which are goals of the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan. B. Rezone Narrative — 9530 Edmonds Way I Packet Pg. 152 Attachment 3 8.1.a Iq__- City of Edmonds PLN2023-0024 REZONE PTRN RS-8 i 5 J �p5 ` L�0 +1 1 .R Wimp W CD 017 il'q 29 < G 950, 2�t30i2.OW 7`. 960� �. b 96'`� 1: 1,516 O 0 126.30 252.6 Feet 188.1 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site anc 2,257 p � B p pp B reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be act WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise re © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUC Legend ReZones PRD RoW Zoning . RS-6 RS-6 RS-10 RS-12 © RSW-12 RS-20 RS-MP RM-3 ■ RM-2.4 ■ RM-1.5 RM-EW 13131 BD2 13133 13134 BD5 OR WMU ® BP BN ® FVMU BC Notes ZONING MAP 0 N d N CD CD M N O N Z J IL Packet Pg. 153 Attachment 3 8.1.a City of Edmonds PLN2023-0024 REZONE Ilk CNI ■ N Legend N �I--- 4 J .Y�V f_ i �t '•' a- 4 '.Y _ ►.�.i �� a. , t:�z ! ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN d I .\ • .y �► ri • <all other values> 4h tw 5;4 State Highways = A ` <all other values> •3 vt► Sections Boundary • • s• �' �� .. _ t� �''�"r` Sections a • �• t L x„ a "� ,e Edmonds Boundary N mo 0 0 .0 ,T ✓. -- .� .. 4 fir, 1b -n.A Q 9�,, � �� � [ . � 1� ArcSDE.G IS. PRO PERTY_BUILDIP M ;ram % - ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN NO ]� � � r ` -�•- ,may_' � <all other values> N Interstate O `V "IMF Principal Arterial Minor Arterial; Collector � (R'. ��yL�„�1. • i - .1 - f - 1- �� - .- t- - Local Street; On Ramp w State Highways "F. .1rM. - _-j '—gip ,y' 1° - ., >:��-I�MQ�.iao• <all other values> At 10 2 �. yS � Notes 0 252.60 505.2 Feet 376.2 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping 4,514 p f B p pp g site and is reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accur� WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise relial © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTII VICINITY MAP Packet Pg. 154 Attach CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION & COMMENT PERIOD FILE NUMBER PLN2023-0024 '11c. 10\3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from Multiple Residential — Edmonds Way (RM-EW) to Community Business — Edmonds Way (BC-EW). The review criteria for rezones are contained within Edmonds Community Development Code 20.40. PROJECT LOCATION: 9530 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA. Tax Parcel Number 27033600117600 NAME OF APPLICANT: d/Arch LLC. — Matt Driscoll FILE NUMBER: PLN2023-0024 DATE OF APPLICATION: May 2, 2023 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: May 30, 2023 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: June 13, 2023 REQUESTED PERMIT: Rezone OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: SEPA Determination EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: SEPA Checklist COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: June 27, 2023 (A Future Hearing Date and Notice will be Provided) Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The city may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record pre -decision hearing, if any, or, if no open record pre -decision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined in ECDC 20.06.020 have standing to initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at httas://www.edmondswa.Rov/services/Dublic involvement/public notices/development notices under the development notice for application number PLN2023-0024, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. CITY CONTACT: Amber Brokenshire, Planner /425-771-0220/ amber. brokenshire@edmondswa.gov Packet Pg. 155 Attach FILE NO.: PLN2023-0024 Applicant: Matt Driscoll, d/Arch I.I.C. DECLARATION OF POSTING On June 13, 2023, the attached Notice of Public Application and Request for Public Comment was posted at the subject property, Civic Hall, Library, and the Public Safety buildings. I, Amber M. Brokenshire, hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct this 1 Th day of June, 2023, at Edmonds, Washington. Signed. {BFP747893.DOC;1\00006.900000\ } Packet Pg. 156 E' er e4f Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH978696 PLN20234-0024 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 06/13/2023 and ending on 06/13/2023 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount f the fee for uch publication is $65.36. Subscribed and sworn fore me on this A! day of Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. City or Ednmud, D-1,4—oa S—,-186031703 MICHHLU MAHrIN PLl� 2 d 2 - �C2aac� 8.1.a cj 1;36 —'cwnONC Linda Phillips Notary Public State of Washington My Appointment Expires 8129/2025 Commission Number 4417 Packet Pg. 157 Attach -Classified Proof �� � . 023- 0_62 � CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF APPLICATION & COMMENT PERIOD FILE NUMBER PLN2023-0024 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject property from klultlple Residential — Edmonds Way (RM-EW) to Community Business — Edmonds Way (BC-EW). The review criteria for rezones are contained within Edmonds Community Development Code 20.40. PROJECT LOCATION: 9530 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA. Tax Parcel Number 27033600117600 NAME OF APPLICANT: d/Arch LLC. — Matt Driscoll FILE NUMBER: PLN2023-0024 DATE OF APPLICATION: May 2, 2023 DATE OF COMPLETENESS: May 30, 2023 DATE OF PUBLIC NOTICE: June 13, 2023 REQUESTED PERMIT: Rezone OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: SEPA Determination EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: SEPA Checklist COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: June 27, 2023 (A Future Hearing Dale and Notice will be Provided) Any person has the right to comment on this application during the public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application, The city may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record pre -decision hearing, if any, or, If no open record pre -decision hearing Is provided, prior to the decislon on the project permit. Only parties of record as defined In ECDC 20 06.020 have standing to Initiate an administrative appeal. Information on this development application can be obtained online at https:ilwwvi.edmondswa.gov/servlces/publlc_involvement/publlc_n oticesldevelopment_notices under the development notice for application number PLN2023-0024, by emalling the City contact listed below, or by tolling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all Inquiries. CITY CONTACT: Amber Brokenshire, Planner /425-771-0220/ amber.brokenshire'@edmondswo.gov Published: June 13, 2023. EDH978696 Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 06/15/2023 10:00:20 am Page: 2 Packet Pg. 158 Attachment 4 Click2Mail MOL Pro Tracing Data Page 1 of 3 For Click2Mail Order #21064513 Tracking Number Mailing Address Scan Status Scan Date Scan Address/Standard Type Location Address (ZipCode) 00270200802188147923 FARMER DANIEL T & GASIMOVA DUNYA 437 NE 72nd St Apt 321 Seattle WA 98115-1406 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147923 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147945 BEAUCHENE JASON D & HOLLY L 12050 15th Ave NE Apt 401 Seattle WA 98125-5065 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147945 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147924 CASCARA LLC 9516 Edmonds Way Edmonds WA 98020-5936 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147924 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147946 SNOHOMISH CO PROP MGMT 3000 Rockefeller Ave # 404 M/S Everett WA 98201 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147946 Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147925 CALDERA GUILLERMO 9512 Edmonds Way Edmonds WA 98020-5936 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147925 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147947 BARNES RICHARD M & MAURENE 23022 94th PI W Edmonds WA 98020-5004 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147947 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147926 GETACHEW DESTA & SOLOMON GENET 20204 37th Ave W Lynnwood WA 98036-9192 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147926 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147941 MURRAY JASON & ELIZABETH 9609 231st PI SW Edmonds WA 98020-5023 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147941 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147920 WZL ENTERPRISES LLC 2800 Western Ave Apt 112 Seattle WA 98121-1154 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147920 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147942 9611 EDMONDS LLC 14150 NE 20th St Ste F1307 Bellevue WA 98007 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147942 Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147921 PUBLIC UTILITY DIST 1 SNO CO 2320 California St Everett WA 98201-3750 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147921 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147943 NGUYEN KEVIN DUY/LE LISA MINH NGOC 9520 231st PI SW Edmonds WA 98020-5022 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147943 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147922 MANTOOTH JENNIFER RAE PO Box 462 Edmonds WA 98020-0462 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147922 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147944 MENCKE CHARLES & MARY 857 NE 67th St Apt 201 Seattle WA 98115-5552 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147944 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147927 COMMERS TESSA\SARTHY JAY 9504 231st PI SW Edmonds WA 98020-5022 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147927 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility Attachment 4 Page 2 of 3 Tracking Number Mailing Address Scan Status Scan Date Scan Address/Standard Type Location Address (ZipCode) 00270200802188147928 DOYLE TIMOTHY P / MCCLOSKEY MARY E 9529 231st PI SW Edmonds WA 98020-5022 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147928 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147929 HARDIN WILLIAM C 9511 Edmonds Way Edmonds WA 98020 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147929 Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147934 EDMONDS WAY LLC PO Box 60216 Seattle WA 98160-0216 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147934 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147913 MOORE GARY B & SHARENE D 424 Lakeview Rd Lynnwood WA 98087-2140 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147913 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147935 HOVLAND MARK A 23014 94th PI W Edmonds WA 98020-5004 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147935 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147914 CONNELL MARISA 23003 97th Ave W Edmonds WA 98020-5009 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147914 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147936 LINNANE SCOTT G/LINNANE RONNE M & SHARON 23006 94th PI W Edmonds WA 98020-5004 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147936 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147915 FOSTER JOHN THOMAS & KIMBERLY JUNE 23027 97th Ave W Edmonds WA 98020-5009 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147915 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147937 THE CASCADIAN IN EDMONDS LLC 901 Westminster Cir Everett WA 98203-3204 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147937 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147930 KORN JOSEPH & MELISSA 9524 Edmonds Way Edmonds WA 98020-5936 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147930 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147931 DUBBELAAR DIRK 9520 Edmonds Way Edmonds WA 98020-5936 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147931 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147932 DANBERG JENNIFER M & KEVIN 9515 231st PI SW Edmonds WA 98020-5022 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147932 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147933 SANCHEZ GEORGE A & KISSKEYS-SANCHEZ RAND 9521 231st PI SW Edmonds WA 98020-5022 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147933 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147916 LINDENSTEIN EDMUND H & JENNIFER L 22808 96th PI W Edmonds WA 98020-4544 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147916 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147938 LONG JEFFREY J 4826 45th Ave SW Seattle WA 98116-4417 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147938 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147917 ADAMS COLIN M & ALEXANDRA 22806 96th PI W Edmonds WA 98020-4544 UNITED STATES Attachment 4 Page 3 of 3 Tracking Number Mailing Address Scan Status Scan Date Address/Standard Type Address Scan Location (ZipCode 00270200802188147917 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147939 HUGHES PATRICIA A 23001 97th Ave W Edmonds WA 98020-5009 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147939 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147918 ROSS RACHEL S & BRADLEY T 22804 96th PI W Edmonds WA 98020-4544 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147918 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147919 J ROBERTS PROPERTIES LLC 702 N 90th St Seattle WA 98103-3810 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147919 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility 00270200802188147940 FAIRWAY APARTMENTS LLC PO Box 713 Mercer Island WA 98040-0713 UNITED STATES 00270200802188147940 Standard Provided to Postal 08/08/23 13:44 EDT 485029998 Processing Facility Report Generated on : August 08, 2023 8.1 a City of Edmonds PLN2023-0024 - Mailing Map 2� •w.� 262s 2�10 22 7v 12620 P 2J 92 10 2712 1 22706 11. 227# 7 o ® � 3 a ^ 9 21718 224 a J 227, a. 9 o )r 2 L T ,w c 2 Qp � ry � 7 Y, 126 � a ^ — _ 22E Is 9511 9721 Q� P N S 9� 2 8� 804 c c -- 1W- Zr 9727 910 9801 EDMONDS WAY 23003 mono �o m m m m m } 23009 P OOP � C POD PP NF C P?■ -o 23014 ?3 23 23024 2 230T8 01■ 2 no 230� 104! 215 1 97=1 idr 03 a ,a 20 a 231 T 1118 , 2Z 97- P 1825 a 231� 97 211 0 * ` .o N N D� P 9620 0 2311 sc IF Mill 227o� 1: 3,031 O 0 252.60 505.2 Feet 4,514 376.2 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurz WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise reliak © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTI( _ O N 0) N o M em Legend O N Z J - Sections Boundary Il Sections N Edmonds Boundary = 0) ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY _BUILDIP t ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN — <all other values> r � Interstate t Principal Arterial .3 Minor Arterial; Collector C Local Street; On Ramp L State Highways t=i <all other values> 3 -- 0 d 1 �I N 2 CD O County Boundary C Parks NI ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_WASHIF 0 ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES 4) ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_CITIES tIXk City of Edmonds City of Lynnwood 'a 0) City of Mountlake Terrace = Unincorporated King Co; Unincor City of Woodway Q Citv of Arlington: Citv of Bothell: ( W _ Notes s t� 9530 Edmonds Way r RM-EW to BC-EW Site Rezone Q Packet Pg. 162 V7 �� N O s ON 23,01,1i Attachment 5 8.1.a Land Use Element Land Use Map Whenever there are references in this plan to categories of land use, they shall apply to areas shown on the Comprehensive Plan Map as follows: Plan Map Designation Land Use Type Compatible Zoning Density Classifications Units/Acre Activity Center Corridor Development Designated Park or School Site Single Family, Resource Single Family, Urban 3 Single Family, Urban 2 Single Family, Urban 1 ............................................................................................ Multi Family - High Density Multi Family — Medium Density ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mixed Use Commercial Community Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Highway 99 Corridor Edmonds Way Corridor Westgate Corridor (Planned Business) Hospital / Medical Master Plan Development Public Use or Park/Open Space Mix of uses; refer to specific plan designations within activity center Mixed use development corridor; refer to specific plan designations within corridor See appropriate category below; also refer to specific activity center discussion in plan See appropriate category below; also refer to specific corridor discussion in plan Public Facility P-zone or appropriate R-zone compatible with neighborhood. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single family RSW-12, RS-12, RS-20 < 4 RS-10 < 4.4 RS-8 < 5.5 RS-6, RS-8 5-8 Multi family RM-1.5, RM-2.4 18-30 RM-2.4, RM-3.0 < 18 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Commercial Mixed Use Commercial or mixture of zones WMU, BC, BN, or equivalent BN or equivalent based on neighborhood plan CG; may include transitional zones as appropriate BP, BN, BC, or similar commercial zone; RM zones BP, BN Special Use District Hospital or Medical zone ................................................................................................_.................................................................................................. Master Plan Master Plan Overlay or equivalent classification ................................................................................................_.................................................................................................. Public or Parks P, OS, or equivalent classification Land Use 37 Packet Pg. 164 Attach CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5ch Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION +,7C. 18y,J May 30, 2023 Matt Driscoll 2412 Westlake Ave. N. Ste. 3 Seattle, WA 98109 mattd(a,darchllc.com Subject: Letter of Completeness Rezone Application Number PLN2023-0024 Mr. Driscoll: On behalf of the City of Edmonds Planning Division, I have reviewed the application for a rezone on the property located at 9530 Edmonds Way from Multiple Residential Edmonds Way (RM EW) to Community Business Edmonds Way (BC-EW) for completeness pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.02.002. The City has determined that the application meets the procedural submission requirements and therefore is complete. Please accept this letter as the City's notice to applicant of determination of completeness pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003. Additional information may be needed as staff continues with review of the application. Staff will contact you as our review continues if any additional information is necessary. Since the application has been determined to be procedurally complete, a notice of application will be posted on the subject property and mailed to adjacent property owners within the next two weeks consistent with ECDC 20.03.002. A public hearing before the Planning Board will be scheduled at a later date. The Planning Board meets on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month. I will work with you on scheduling the meeting before the Planning Board based on your availability. If you have any questions of me, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or via email at amber.brokenshire&edmondswa. gov. Sincerely, �& ljuaau Amber Brokenshire, Planner Packet Pg. 165 Attach MEMORANDUM Date: June 21, 2023 To: Amber Brokenshire, Planning Division From: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Division Subject: PLN2023-0024 — Rezone RM-EW to BC-EW 9530 Edmonds Way Engineering has reviewed the subject application and found the information provided is consistent with Title 18 Edmonds Community Development Code. Compliance with Engineering codes and construction standards will be reviewed with any future building permit application for development of the site. The proposed rezone is understood to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, which identifies the Edmonds Way Corridor for Mixed -Use development. Depending on the future use of the site, either a tranpsortation study or an analysis will be required. Please note, the City's GIS utility map indicates stormwater flows through the subject property. Snohomish County records indicate a 4-lot subdivision was recorded in 2003 (AFN 200301175007) which granted a 10-ft drainage easement to the City of Edmonds through the property. While the subject rezone will not impact this easement, future development will need to give consideration to the easement. Any modifications to the easement will need to be addressed with any future development permits for the site. Thank you. City of Edmonds Packet Pg. 166 Attach Brokenshire, Amber From: Rachel Ross <raross1010@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 9:49 PM To: Brokenshire, Amber Cc: Brad Ross; Alek; cadams05O2@gmail.com Subject: PLN2023-0024 Comment Period Hi Amber - We are writing to oppose the request to rezone the lot at property location 9530 Edmonds Way from RM-EW to BC-EW. We are concerned this change in zoning will increase the volume and frequency of traffic entering and exiting Hwy 104 at a spot in the road where there is increase risk for collision. The following reasons support this conclusion: 1. There have already been multiple accidents along the curve at 95th PI W each year, which this lot is very near to. 2. Cars continue to speed along the highway at this location making it unsafe to enter and exit the highway when not at an intersection. 3. This would cause potential risk for collision for cars heading east and wanting to turn left at 95th PI W, as the turn lane would compete with drivers heading west and looking to turn left into the lot at 9530. The cars paths would cross within the same turn lane. 4. The lot across the street at 9601 is zoned for commercial use and their proposed site plans has the entrance/exit in conflict with this lot (9530), whereby drivers would be crossing the highway within the same turn lane section (also competing with 95th PI W). 5. Having commercial use at both locations (9601 & 9530) would cause a linchpin at a dangerous section of the highway, similar to the challenges of multiple intersections of cross traffic just west of this location - where PCC and the gas station sits. 6. No other commercial property resides east of 97th Ave W along the south side of the road where it is all residential properties. 7. Safety is our biggest concern as we walk along this section of the highway and an increase in cross traffic could pose a risk for pedestrians. As parties of record, we kindly request you consider our concerns when evaluating whether to approve this application to rezone to BC-EW. Thanks, Packet Pg. 167 Attach Brad & Rachel Ross 22804 96th PI W Edmonds, 98020 Colin & Alek Adams 22806 96th PI W Edmonds, 98020 Packet Pg. 168 Attach Brokenshire, Amber From: Levitan, David Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:02 AM To: Brokenshire, Amber Subject: FW: Potential Rezone of PUD substation from Multifamily Residential to Commercial in City of Edmonds Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged FYI From: Flury, Mark <MMFlury@SNOPUD.com> Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 10:43 AM To: Levitan, David <David.Levitan @EdmondsWa.Gov> Cc: Zyskowski, Jason <JAZyskowski@SNOPUD.com>; Johnston, Kim <KDJohnston@Snopud.com>; Payne, Guy <GOPayne@Snopud.com>; Oens, Mark <MAOens@snopud.com>; Barnes, Maureen <MLBarnes@Snopud.com> Subject: Potential Rezone of PUD substation from Multifamily Residential to Commercial in City of Edmonds David: Thank you for your time this week to discuss the subject rezone proposal. Thank you also for your e-mail (7/27) and for the opportunity to consider a potential re -zone of parcel no. 27033600114000 from RM-1.5 to BC-EW. Our phone conversation was very helpful and I gained an understanding of the zoning differences between residential and commercial and the City of Edmonds' approach to zoning public facilities such as a substation. The subject parcel is the site of the District owned and operated Westgate Substation. The substation was constructed in 1968 under the jurisdiction of Snohomish County, prior to annexation by the City of Edmonds. The District has no objection to the proposed re -zone from RM-1.5 to BC-EW with the understanding that the re -zone will not result in the requirement to remedy any existing conditions that may be considered non -conforming, such as: • no changes will be required to poles or structures that exceed 25 ft. in height; • no changes will be required to fence height or materials; • no changes will be required to landscaping setbacks or screening; and, • no changes will be required to the driveway or sidewalk. Thank you for your pro -active outreach regarding the proposed re -zone. The District looks forward to working collaboratively with the City of Edmonds on any future improvements to this site. Please let me know if you have any questions or require additional information. Regards, Mark Mark Flury, P.E. Senior Manager, Trans. & Distr. System Operations & Engineering Snohomish County PUD No. 1 PH: (425) 783-1722 Cell: (425) 293-6301 mmflury@snopud.com Packet Pg. 169 of ED41 d CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to rezone the 9530 Edmonds Way from Multiple Residential — Edmonds Way to Commercial Business — Edmonds Way (BC-EW). The rezone is being extended to the adjacent parcel at 9620 Edmonds Way. The review criteria for rezones are contained within Chapter 20.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. PROJECT LOCATION: 9530 & 9620 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA Tax Parcel Numbers 27033600117600, 27033600114000 NAME OF APPLICANT: d/Arch LLC. — Matt Driscoll FILE NO.: PLN2023-0024 COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: September 13, 2023 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Information on this development application can be obtained online at https://www.edmondswa.gov/services/public_involvement/public_ notices/devel opment_notices under the development notice for application number PLN2023- 0024, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. A copy of the staff report will be available at least seven days prior to the hearing. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: A hybrid public hearing will be held by the Planning Board on September 13, 2023 at 7 p.m. The public hearing was opened at the Planning Board's August 23, 2023 meeting, but not all property owners with 300 feet of 9620 Edmonds Way were notified, so the public hearing was continued to September 13 to allow for re - noticing. The public comment portion of the hearing remains open and public comments will be accepted through the public hearing (September 13). The physical location is at Edmonds City Hall, 1215th Avenue N, 3rd Floor, Brackett Room. Or join the Zoom meeting at: https://edmondswa- aov.zoom. us/i/87322872194?Dwd=W FdxTWJ IQmxlTG9LZkc3KOhuS014QT09 Or via phone by dialing 253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 873 2287 2194 Password: 007978 CITY CONTACT: Amber Brokenshire, Planner/Amber.Brokenshire@edmondswa.gov/425-771-0220 DATE OF NOTICE: August 29, 2023 Packet Pg. 170 I 8.1.a I �__- City of Edmonds PLN2023-0024 - MAILING MAP 0 252.60 505.2 Feet 376.2 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for 4,514 p B p pp B reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION 0 N d N O O O M N Legend O N z J ArcSDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLIN i3 — <all other values> N 1 r.+ C d 2 E S 5; 4 9;71;7;8 +' M State Highways <all other values> 3 0 C 1 lv 2 Sections Boundary Sections Edmonds Boundary ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_BUILDIP ArcSDE.G IS.STREET_CE NTERLI N <all other values> Interstate Principal Arterial Minor Arterial; Collector Local Street; On Ramp State Highways <all other values> 0 1 2 Notes 9530 & 9620 Edmonds Way RM-EW, RM-1.5 to BC-EW Site Rezone 08/28/2023 Packet Pg. 171 1 8.1 a City of Edmonds q 9l�� 22809 9"0 6 9� 00 PLN2023-0024 REZONE 22804 C, 1 Ln KM-1.:; JMU os WE - ____ =--- "� 0 M-1.5 t MoNos E� 23003 23001 23006 0o� l i rjm N I 9S "� 23009 Ln Ln CD 23014 23017 N n' 9529 o 9508 23024 23027 9601 1:1,516 Q 9S, 0 126.30 2S2.6 Feet 188.1 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is 2,257 P B P PP g reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accura WGS_1984_Web-Mercator _Auxiliary -Sphere current, or otherwise reliab © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTIC Legend QReZones PRD Ro W Zoning RS-6 RS-8 RS-10 RS-12 r7 RSW-12 RS-20 RS-MP RIM-3 ■ RIM-2.4 ■ RIM-1.5 RM-EW BD1 BD2 F BD3 +\ BD4 BD5 +\ OR WMU BP BN ® FVMU BC Notes 9530 & 9620 EDMONDS WAY Packet Pg. 172 8.1.a From: Rothfus, Debbie To: Martin, Michelle Subject: FW: Thank you for placing your classified advertisement. Date: Monday, August 28, 2023 8:05:06 AM From: Sound Search <Oregon-Washington-Classifieds@clicknbuy.com> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2023 6:06 AM To: Rothfus, Debbie <debbie.rothfus@edmondswa.gov> Subject: Thank you for placing your classified advertisement. Ad # 983067 Thank you for placing your classified advertisement. The following represents the current text of your advertisement: CITY OF EDMONDS NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is proposing to rezone the 9530 Edmonds Way from Multiple Residential - Edmonds Way to Commercial Business - Edmonds Way (BC-EW). The rezone is being extended to the adjacent parcel at 9620 Edmonds Way. The review criteria for rezones are contained within Chapter 20.40 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. PROJECT LOCATION: 9530 & 9620 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA Tax Parcel Numbers 27033600117600, 27033600114000 NAME OF APPLICANT: d/Arch LLC. - Matt Driscoll FILE NO.: PLN2023-0024 COMMENTS ON PROPOSAL DUE: September 13, 2023 Any person has the right to comment on this application during public comment period, receive notice and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application. The City may accept public comments at any time prior to the closing of the record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the decision on the project permit. Information on this development application can be obtained online at https://www.edmondswa.gov/services/public involvement/public notices/development notices under the development notice for application number PLN2023-0024, by emailing the City contact listed below, or by calling the City of Edmonds at 425-771-0220. Please refer to the application number for all inquiries. A copy of the staff report will be available at least seven days prior to the hearing. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: A hybrid public hearing will be held by the Planning Board on September 13, 2023 at 7 p.m. The public hearing was opened at the Planning Board's August 23, 2023 meeting, but not all property owners with 300 feet of 9620 Edmonds Way were notified, so the public hearing was continued to September 13 to allow for re -noticing. The public comment portion of the hearing remains open and public comments will be accepted through the public hearing (September 13). The physical location is at Edmonds City Hall, 121 5th Avenue N, 3rd Floor, Brackett Room. Orjoin the Zoom meeting at: https://edmondswa-gov.zoom.uszi/87322872194? pwd=WFdxTWJIQmxlTG9LZkc3KOhuS0140T09 Or via phone by dialing 253-215-8782 Meeting ID: 873 2287 2194 Password: 007978 CITY CONTACT: Amber Brokenshire, Planner Amber.Brokenshire(@edmondswa.gov 425-771-0220 DATE OF NOTICE: August 29, 2023 Published: August 29, 2023. EDH983067 Packet Pg. 173 8.1.a You also have the exciting option to enhance your online advertisement with extended text, photos and even multimedia at no additional cost. Enhancing your classified advertisement will give you increased exposure to thousands of online shoppers that visit our classified section every day. You can also choose to add shipping and delivery options for the buyer. Enhancing your advertisement is easy; just follow the online AdWizard to add an expanded description, photos and even video/audio of your item. To log in to the New Ad Wizard use your email address and existing password. Go to: https://secure.adpay.com/adwizard_login.aspx?1=32387714 , if this link is inactive, cut and paste it into your browser address window. If you need any assistance with your advertisement, please contact our classifieds department. Thank you for using Click-N-Buy Classifieds. Packet Pg. 174 8.1.a Brokenshire, Amber From: Martin, Michelle Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 2:40 PM To: Rothfus, Debbie Cc: Lakefish, Heather; Brokenshire, Amber Subject: FW: click2mail.com: New Order # 14020993232 Hi Debbie, This is for Amber's Renotice Project #PLN2023-0024. Thanks ClickgMail* Order No.14020993232 Order Total: $54.77 Order DateAug 28, 2023, 9:38:08 PM Accountmmartin Payment Method Credit Card Crcdit Cued Credit Card Type Visa Credit Card Number XXXX-4929 Number of Jobs 1 Billing Address Ms Michelle Martin City of Edmonds - Attn./A. Brokenshire Renotice PLN2023-0024 121 5th Ave N Edmonds Washington 98020-3163 United States Job and Product Information Job ID: 21329565 Letter - Separate Address Page in a #10 Envelope - 5 sheet max. Product SKU.- LT41-P Job Source: PMUI Product Type: Letter 8.5 X 11, Paper Type: White 24#, Print Color: Black And White, Print Options: Printing Both Sides, Mail Class: First Class, Production Time: Next Day, Com: NO, Base Document Name: PLN2023 0024 Click2mail Renotice 0829202 Job Address List Name: Mailing List 9 Production Cost for 50 Pieces:$24.00 First Class Automation Letter Postage for 48 Pieces: $26.93 1 Packet Pg. 175 8.1.a First Class Unsorted Letter Postage for 2 Pieces: $1.32 Invoice Subtotal: Tax: Total Invoice: From: Click2Mail Customer Support <support@click2mail.com> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 2:38 PM To: Martin, Michelle <michelle.martin@edmondswa.gov> Subject: click2mail.com: New Order # 14020993232 Dear Ms Michelle Martin, Thank you for your order from click2mail.com. Below is a copy of your invoice. You can check the status of your order at any time or by loggia into nto your account. Thank you again for your business. Ms Michelle Martin Credit Card City of Edmonds - Attn./A. Brokenshire Credit Card Renotice PLN2023-0024 121 5th Ave N Credit Card Type Visa Edmonds Washington 98020-3163 Credit Card XXXX- United States Number 4929 ,1 X Completeln progressAttention 2 Packet Pg. 176 8.1.a Letter - Separate Address Page in a #10 Envelope - 5 sheet max. SKU: LT41-P Job id: 21329565 Document Name: PLN2023 0024 Click2mail Renotice 08292023 1 Mailinglist Name: Mailing_List_9 product type Letter 8.5 x 11 paper type White 24# print color Black and White envelope # 10 Double Window print options Printing both sides mail class First Class production_ time Next Day personalizing Yes isCom NO Thanks again! C1ick2Mail Customer Support 2023-08- 50 $52.25 1 processing 29 Subtotal $52.25 Tax $2.52 Grand Total $54.77 If you have any questions about your account or any other matter, please feel free to contact us at support@click2mail.com or by phone at (866) 665-2787. C1ick2Mail Customer Support is available Monday - Friday from 9am 8pm EST. View our terms and conditions For more details write to us at support@click2mail.com 3 Packet Pg. 177 8.1.b PLN2023-0024 REZONE 2 PARCELS FROM RM-EW/RM-1.5 TO BC-EW 9530 & 9620 Edmonds Way Amber Brokenshire, Planner Planning Board Public Hearing September 13, 2023 W C O E W 0 N w M LO O N d N O O M N O N Z J a Packet Pg. 178 8.1.b y C O E LU Overview N O O M LO • Applicant requested rezone from Multiple Residential — O Edmonds Way (RM-EW) to Community Business — Edmonds Way (BC-EW) for property at 9530 Edmonds Way 0 M N O N Z J • Addition of adjacent PUD substation (zoned RM-1.5) PL r • Site Context • Rezone Review Criteria • Recommendation MT Packet Pg. 179 Site Context l • The proposal includes two parcels fronting Edmonds Way o PUD substation added following inquiry from Planning Board • In 20071, Ordinance 3627 established the Edmonds Way designation. • The eastern site has remained undeveloped, even after being rezoned from RM-1.5 to RM-EW in 2022. � v O r N M c 0 E w O N W M 06 O M LO M 0 N N O O M N O N Z J IL Packet Pg. 180 8.1.b Addition of PUD Substation at 9620 Edmonds Way • During July 26 introduction to proposal, Planning Board members inquired about adding the adjacent PUD substation to provide a consistent zoning framework in this portion of Edmonds Way • City staff reached out to PUD on July 27 asking about including the property as part of the rezone proposal • PUD confirmed in August 7 email (Attachment 9) that they had no objections to the proposed zoning change • Proposal boundaries have been expanded to include both properties M C O E W O N O M LO O d C O N d W N O O M N O N Z J a Packet Pg. 181 8.1.b Surrounding Area • Western lot is developed with a PUD substation. • Eastern lot is undeveloped. • Multi -family zoning east and west of the subject properties • Properties east developed with mix of MF & SF, could develop to MF with current RM designation. • Edmonds Way north of sites. • Residential south (approx. 26' change in elevation) • BC-EW allows buildings fronting EW to increase height to 40 feet with development requirements. (ECDC 16.30.020) 0 C O E W CD W M LA d O N d ICT O O M N O N Z J a Packet Pg. 182 8.1.b Rezone Review Criteria • Per ECDC 20.40.010, the Planning Board review shall at least consider the following factors in reviewing a proposed rezone • Comprehensive Plan • Zoning Ordinance • Surrounding Area • Changes • Suitability • Value W C O E W N W O M LO d C O N d W N O O M N O N Z J a Packet Pg. 183 8.1.b Comprehensive Plan and Compatible Zoning • Comprehensive Plan Designation • Edmonds Way Corridor • Compatible Zoning • BP, BN, BC, or similar commercial zone and RM zones • A rezone to BC-EW would be consistent with the Comp Plan and would not require SEPA review o SEPA review required at project stage At M C O E W O N O O M LO O d C O N d W N O O M N O N Z J a Packet Pg. 184 8.1.b Zoning Analysis • A rezone to BC-EW would allow for increased densities, reduced setbacks, a smaller floor area ratio, and an increased height to 40 feet for buildings fronting Edmonds Way. • However, additional/revised site development standards would also apply to the site, including: • The street setback of any proposed building shall be increased to 15 feet in depth. Type III landscaping shall be located within this setback • Where the proposed development abuts a single-family residential (RS) zoned property, the proposed development shall modulate the design of any building facades facing the single-family residentially (IRS) zoned property; • The rezone appears consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and would be consistent with the comp plan while helping to achieve a variety of housing types. Packet Pg. 185 8.1.b Public Benefits of BC-EW Zoning • At least 3 of the following must be incorporated into the building and/or site design within the BC-EW zone: • Sustainable building techniques (LEED gold certification) • Inclusion of housing units affordable to persons at low/moderate income as determined by Snohomish County Tomorrow. The number of affordable units must be at least 15 percent of the gross number of units proposed; • Public amenities within an area comprising at least 25 percent of the length of any required street setback such as outdoor seating, plazas, walkways or other usable open space. The remainder of the setback area will be landscaped with Type III landscaping; • Low impact development (LID) techniques are employed Packet Pg. 186 8.1.b Public Notice and Public Comments • Notice of Application issued on June 13 and initial Notice of Public Hearing issued on August 8, 2023 • With this notice, staff received one public comment in opposition to the proposal based on concerns about traffic and site access on this portion of Edmonds Way (Attachment 8) • Traffic impacts will be further reviewed and addressed at the project stage • A Notice of Continued Public Hearing was issued on August 29 to properties within 300' of both parcels (Attachment 10) • No additional comments were received • Following the staff presentation, the public will have an opportunity to provide oral testimony M C O E W N W O M LO O N d W N O O M N O N Z J a Packet Pg. 187 8.1.b Process, Recommendation &Next Steps • Site specific rezones are a Type IV (legislative) permit, with the Planning Board holding a public hearing and making a recommendation to City Council • The Planning Board is asked to take public testimony before discussing and deliberating on the proposal • Based on its analysis, staff is proposing that the Planning Board forward a recommendation to City Council to approve the rezone • City Council would then hold a separate public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance to change the zoning 'r MT Questions. Packet Pg. 188 8.1.c CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Hybrid Meeting August 23, 2023 Chair Gladstone called the hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:05 p.m. at Edmonds City Hall and on Zoom. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES The Land Acknowledgement was read by Board Member Maxwell. Board Members Present Judi Gladstone, Chair Lauren Golembiewski Susanna Martini Nick Maxwell Jeremy Mitchell (online) Beth Tragus-Campbell, Vice Chair Lily Distelhorst (student rep) (online) Board Members Absent Richard Kuehn (excused) Emily Nutsch (alternate) (excused) READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES Staff Present David Levitan, Planning Manager Amber Brokenshire, Planner Deb Powers, Urban Forest Planner MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSI, SECONDED BY VICE PRESIDENT TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 26 AS AMENDED. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Bill Phipps, Edmonds resident, spoke regarding the Tree Code amendment. He noted he had submitted a letter today. He stressed the importance of the Tree Code for the environment and for the future of Edmonds. He wished the Board luck getting through it. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 23, 2023 Pagel of 6 Packet Pg. 189 8.1.c ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS None PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Public Hearing on updates to Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Code Amendment (CARA) (AMD2023-0004) Staff Presentation: The hearing was opened at 7:10 p.m. Planning Manager Levitan reviewed this item. In the last few weeks, staff has continued to have discussions on the stormwater portion of this, but there is additional work that needs to be done. Staff is continuing to have conversations with Olympic View Water and Sewer District and continuing to have conversations about the integration of the stormwater code into the CARA code. Staff recommended continuing the public hearing to a date certain of September 13. They are confident they will have fully developed draft code language, including the stormwater component, at that time. MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MARTINI, TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Chair Gladstone noted that the Department of Ecology has issued its Stormwater Manual and Permits draft for update. It has a lot of new regulations regarding protection of aquifers from stormwater use and underground injection control wells, which is Olympic View's primary concern. Olympic View, and her organization, the Washington Association of Sewer and Water Districts, have been actively involved in making this more rigorous. Public Comments: None MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL REFINEMENTS TO THE DRAFT CODE LANGUAGE. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. B. Public Hearing for Rezone Proposal at 9530/9620 Edmonds Way (PLN2023-0024) The public hearing was opened at 7:18 p.m. Chair Gladstone read the script regarding the purpose and procedures of the hearing. She asked if any member of the Board had engaged in communication with opponents or proponents regarding the issues in this rezone application outside of the public hearing process. All members answered in the negative. She asked if anyone on the Board had a conflict of interest or believed that he or she could not hear and consider this application in a fair and obj ective manner. All members responded in the negative. She asked if there was anyone in the audience who objected to her participation or any other board member's participation as a decision maker in this hearing. There were no responses from the audience in the room or online. She asked everyone planning on testifying to raise their right hand and affirm that their testimony would be truthful. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 23, 2023 Page 2 of 6 Packet Pg. 190 Staff Presentation: Planner Amber Brokenshire made the staff presentation regarding the applicant -requested rezone from Multiple Residential — Edmonds Way (RM-EW) to Community Business — Edmonds Way (BC- EW) for property at 9530 Edmonds Way. She reviewed the addition of the adjacent PUD substation (zoned RM 1.5) in response to the Board's request and PUD's approval; site context; and rezone review criteria. A rezone to BC-EW would allow for increased densities, reduced setbacks, a smaller floor area ration, and an increased height to 40 feet for buildings fronting Edmonds Way. However, additional/revised site development standards would also apply to the site such as increased street setbacks (to 15 feet) and modulation requirements where adjacent to single-family residential (RS). The rezone appears to be consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance and would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan while helping to achieve a variety of housing types. At least three types of public benefits must be incorporated into the building and/or site design within the BC-EW zone. To date, staff has received one public comment in opposition to the proposal based on concerns about traffic and site access on this portion of Edmonds Way. Traffic impacts will be further reviewed and addressed at the project state. Following public testimony and deliberation, staff is proposing that the Planning Board forward a recommendation to City Council to approve the rezone. City Council would then hold a separate public hearing and consider adoption of an ordinance to change the zoning. General clarification questions followed. Chair Gladstone asked if the notice requirements were sufficient since the rezone had added on the PUD property. She thought it should be expanded since they expanded the proposal area. Planning Manager Levitan left the meeting briefly (so he could have internet access) to confirm that adequate noticing was done for the notice of public hearing to include a 300-foot radius from both parcels, not just the original parcel. Applicant Testimony: Shaun Leiser, 2024 NW 190t1' Street, Shoreline, WA, said he grew up in Edmonds and is invested in the community. He explained that he has owned the property for 20 years. Regarding why the change to BC now, he said he previously didn't want to deal with the commercial aspect but he has had a change of heart. He explained they are planning on doing underground parking. Regarding the drainage easement, they will work with the Edmonds Engineering Department to work on rerouting that around the buildable area at the appropriate time. Currently the stormwater from the development above his is just dumped onto his property. They will be improving the existing situation with low impact development and creating better water quality with whatever the regulations are. His goal is to build a nice building for the community. Board Member Martini asked what type of building he plans to build. Mr. Leiser replied that the intent is to build an apartment building with a mix of sizes. He noted that with the new development there would be a planting strip and a much larger sidewalk than currently exists. Chair Gladstone said she assumed there was a stormwater line to tap into from his property and that there was just no one there to connect it before. Mr. Leiser was not sure but said he has located the end of the pipe. Mr. Leiser referred to concerns that had been raised about traffic and access. He noted that there are four properties that will be sharing the curb cut to SR 104. They will not be adding an additional curb cut; they will actually be making it better than it is now. The access road currently is gravel. Additionally, because of the PUD substation, his setback will actually be further back than 15 feet because of overhead powerlines. It will likely be closer to 30 feet back. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 23, 2023 Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 191 8.1.c Public Testimony: Larry Williamson commented that there is a group of single-family homes to the immediate east of this parcel. He asked if those would be rezoned as well. Ms. Brokenshire explained that they would not change. They have an access easement to Edmonds Way and will not be directly impacted by this rezone. Mr. Williamson wondered if the increased height, increased density, and commercial activity will be in the interest of the single- family properties adjacent to this property and in the area. He noted that if they rezone this property, they will be creating a commercial parcel in the middle of a residential row of properties. Ms. Brokenshire explained there is a 15-foot required setback from R-zoned properties. They would also have to modulate their height adjacent to those R-zoned properties. Seeing no further comments, the public testimony portion of the hearing was closed. Board Questions and Deliberation: Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell referred to the three properties immediately adjacent to the subject property. She asked for confirmation that 9516 has already been rezoned to residential multifamily (RM-EW). Staff confirmed this. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell asked about the current zoning of 9520 and 9524. Ms. Brokenshire explained they are zoned RM 1.5. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell summarized that the three properties to the east of the subject property are all zoned multifamily even though they might currently have single-family residences on them. Ms. Brokenshire concurred. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell referred to the properties to the south of 9620, the PUD substation — 2303 and 2301 and asked if they are currently zoned at RS-8. Ms. Brokenshire affirmed that they are. Planning Manager Levitan reported that there was not a 300-foot radius from 9620 (the expanded area) included in the public hearing notice for this application. He recommended not making a final recommendation to Council tonight so staff could re -notice the project to be compliant with noticing requirements. He proposed reopening the public comment period and leaving it open. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MITCHELL, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS- CAMPBELL, TO REOPEN THE PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THE HEARING. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Public Testimony: Jake Lam, 9516 property owner/developer directly east of the subject property. He is in favor of the rezone. He spoke to the need to provide more housing in Edmonds. He thinks there are a lot of opportunities along Edmonds Way for both commercial and residential activity. He thinks the characteristics of the project fit in with what he believes the City of Edmonds is trying to do along Edmonds Way. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MITCHELL, TO CONTINUE THE HEARING TO SEPTEMBER 13. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 23, 2023 Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 192 8.1.c UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Work Session on Private Property Tree Regulations (AMD2022-0004) Urban Forest Planner Deb Powers made the presentation on code options related to property owner tree removals. Due to technical difficulties with sharing the PowerPoint, Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell requested that a copy of the presentation be included with the minutes. At the previous meeting there was general agreement to keep the regulations simple, that no healthy trees should be removed in critical areas, and to allow two trees to be removed per 12 months. Does this apply to larger trees? What about replacement requirements? She reviewed public and stakeholder feedback. She stated there was general support for limiting or prohibiting tree removal in critical areas. Additionally, the Tree Board had a strong recommendation to limit landmark tree removals. There was also previously a discussion about allowing a greater number of tree removals on larger properties. She reviewed a table showing options for property sizes with greater numbers of tree removal allowances for larger properties. The Board needs to decide if removal limits based on property size is a preferred approach. She reviewed some draft code options related to tree removal allowances depending on the size of the removed trees and noted that this would also increase the complexity and involvement by both the staff and applicant. Is this consistent with the stated goal of having a simple code? Chair Gladstone asked if there are other jurisdictions that use property size as part of their reporting and notification. Ms. Powers replied that Kirkland, Woodinville, and Bellevue all look at differences in property sizes, but it is up to the community. There was some discussion about the process of code development and how that affects the complexity or simplicity of the resulting code. Chair Gladstone noted it was important to answer the question of which trees to which this would apply. Would they even allow tree removals for trees over 23.9" DBH? Ms. Powers referred to a matrix that showed various code options related to landmark trees available to the Board, staff recommendations and solicited feedback. After landmark trees are defined, that code option is shown under Code Option III, Tree Removal Allowance - applicable tree size, in blue text under number 2. Code Option III2: Any private property owner of developed property may remove up to one landmark tree within a 12-month period with the submittal of a Tree Removal Notification form. The Board had expressed support for limiting but not prohibiting landmark tree removals. Ms. Powers explained that rather than create a new size definition for trees in between significant and landmark trees, that the removal allowance just applies to landmark trees. The matrix shows the more complex code options in red text. There was some discussion if the number of allowed landmark tree removals should be one or two per 12 months. A permit would be required to exceed that numerical allowance, as shown under Code Option IV. Code Option IV.1: Tree removal scenarios that require a permit. The following activities shall require a Tree Removal Permit and tree replacements: The proposed removal of.• • Hazard or nuisance trees that exceed allowances (new) • Hazard or nuisance trees located within wetlands, streams and associated buffers, high landslide%rosion hazard areas and slopes greater than 25% critical areas (new) Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 23, 2023 Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 193 8.1.c • Trees located on commercial and multi family -zoned properties (current) • Trees located on vacant lots and/or subdividable properties (current) • Healthy landmark trees that exceed the number of tree removal allowances. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell spoke in support of the allowance and not having the graduated sizes because of the cleanliness of it. She likes the idea of the graduated sizes but it feels like it will cause more of a burden from an applicant and processing standpoint. She thinks allowing two landmark trees is too much. If they are going to do an across-the-board allowance of two trees, she thinks they should be 20 inches or smaller. Chair Gladstone said she agrees that landmark trees feel different. She realizes this adds complexity to the code but she thinks they need to figure out a way to differentiate them. Ms. Powers explained that Kirkland has two categories — significant and landmark. Significant is defined as trees at least 6 inches in trunk diameter. If they want to regulate trees of a certain size range between significant and landmark trees (such as over 12 inches), they need to define that category though. There was discussion about how these definitions relate to the development code. Vice Chair Campbell expressed an interest in staying consistent with the development code definitions and possibly increasing the allowance for significant trees. Chair Gladstone acknowledged the late hour and recommended they come back to this at the next work session in order to have enough time to get feedback from everyone. She also requested that staff provide a clear staff preferred recommendation for the tree code as a starting point so they can get through it a little quicker. Board Member Golembiewski suggested jumping right back in where they left off at the next meeting and skipping the introduction. NEW BUSINESS None. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA There was discussion about the extended agenda and agreement to revisit the tree code on September 13 if there is time after the two hearings and then again on September 27. Staff needs to consider how pushing this out impacts everything else on the extended agenda including the Comprehensive Plan, the planned public hearing for the CFP/CIP, and a couple other projects. Staff will review this and come back with a revised schedule on a proposed approach for the tree code. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Gladstone commented that the earlier staff can provide the CFP/CIP to the Board the better. She urged all board members to review the tree code and submit questions to staff ahead of the meeting in order to save time at the meeting. She asked Planning Manager Levitan to pass along her appreciation to Deb Powers for the format of the information she had provided tonight. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:22 p.m. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 23, 2023 Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 194 8.1.d CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Hybrid Meeting September 13, 2023 Chair Gladstone called the hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. at Edmonds City Hall and on Zoom. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES The Land Acknowledgement was read by Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell. Board Members Present Judi Gladstone, Chair Lauren Golembiewski Richard Kuehn Susanna Martini Nick Maxwell Jeremy Mitchell Beth Tragus-Campbell, Vice Chair Emily Nutsch (alternate) Lily Distelhorst (student rep) Board Members Absent None Staff Present Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Amber Brokenshire, Planner Deb Powers, Urban Forest Planner READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MARTINI, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 23, 2023 AS PRESENTED. MOTION PASSED 6-0 WITH BOARD MEMBER KUEHN ABSTAINING. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Larry Williamson made comments about the tree code. He has lived on a large lot with about half a dozen very large trees for 45 years; some of them are landmark trees. If he is allowed to take down two landmark trees a year as proposed he would be able to basically strip his property of trees in about three years. He expressed concern that the tree code isn't really protecting trees that much. Even though this would be simple to understand and easy to administer, are they really protecting trees? Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 13, 2023 Page 1 of 9 Packet Pg. 195 8.1.d Debora Ashland expressed support for the tree code, particularly regulations regarding the removal of trees in Edmonds. She noted that she has only seen regulations related to single family tree removals but she is also interested in regulations for all developed properties. She stated she supported regulations that limit tree removal much like Kirkland. She thinks people should be able to remove nuisance or hazardous trees but there needs to be a definition of those. She encouraged the Planning Board to work jointly with the Tree Board in these efforts. Bill Phipps commented in the online chat that he had submitted written comments already and agrees with the comments of Larry Williamson. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS None PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Continued Public Hearing on updates to Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) Code Amendment (AMD2023-0004) Senior Planner Mike Clugston noted that the hearing has been continued a couple times. Staff found out in the last week or so that they need to do some more work on the draft CARA regulations, especially as it relates to the Stormwater Code. Staff's recommendation is to close the current public hearing, and when the draft is ready, staff can notice a new public hearing. He asked if the Board would want another work session to go over those things before holding another public hearing. Board Member Golembiewski asked about the Board's purview as it relates to the stormwater code. Mr. Clugston explained that staff is now leaning toward putting the stormwater language in the CARA chapter. If so, it would be something the Planning Board would look at. Board Member Golembiewski spoke in support of having a work session on the draft code. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell concurred. Chair Gladstone also expressed support noting that the stormwater code is the critical piece for the CARA for the aquifer protection. She is pleased that it will be in the CARA code because it makes it easier for developers to sort out what is required. MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CARA CODE AMENDMENTS TO ALLOW STAFF TIME TO COMPLETE THE WORK AND REQUEST THAT STAFF BRINGS THE DRAFT BACK TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR A WORK SESSION PRIOR TO A NEW PUBLIC HEARING. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Board Member Mitchell asked about a timeline. Mr. Clugston said they hope to bring it back to a work session in October and a public hearing soon after that. He noted, however, that there have been some staff changes that will impact this. B. Continued Public Hearing for Rezone Proposal at 9530/9620 Edmonds Way (PLN2023-0024) Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 13, 2023 Page 2 of 9 Packet Pg. 196 8.1.d Planner Amber Brokenshire pointed out the inclusion of noticing 300 feet around both parcels. She reviewed the proposed project to rezone two parcels along Edmonds Way to BC-EW Community Business. The adjacent PUD substation was added to the proposal. The site to the east is still undeveloped even after being rezoned last year from RM-1.5 to RM-EW. Upon a request by the Planning Board, staff had reached out to the PUD about including the property as part of the rezone proposal. The PUD had no objections to the proposed zoning change. The proposal boundaries have been expanded to include both properties. She reviewed the surrounding area, compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, zoning analysis, public benefits of BC-EW zoning, public notice, and public comments. Staff is recommending that the Planning Board forward a recommendation to City Council to approve the rezone. Chair Gladstone commented that they had had a pretty thorough discussion at the last hearing; the only issue was the noticing of 300 feet around both parcels. Staff had re -noticed this and received no additional public comments. She asked if there were any other questions. Public Testimony: Shaun Leiser, 2024 NW 190th Street, Shoreline, WA, applicant, said he was available to answer any questions. Seeing no further public testimony, the public hearing was closed. Deliberation: MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MARTINI TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REZONE TO CITY COUNCIL. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. AMD2022-0004, Tree Code Amendments Urban Forest Planner Deb Powers shared public testimony on the tree code amendments since the last meeting and continued the discussion from the last meeting on property owner tree removals. She shared the following verbiage as a starting point for discussions and stated they would need to determine the number, tree size, and timeframe metrics to fill in the gaps in the draft code. X. Tree removal allowance 4. Any private property owner of developed property may remove up to [number] [tree size] within [timeframe] with the submittal of a Tree Removal Notification form. No replacement trees are required for trees removed under the tree removal allowance. Ms. Powers explained that they had discussed having mandatory minimums so that when a property owner gets to a certain number of trees left on a lot or if they started with a low number of trees, it could trigger tree replacement requirements. She reminded the Board that the tree removal allowance is meant to be an extremely easy process that does not require extensive review. Staff believes it will still slow the loss of canopy as well as Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 13, 2023 Page 3 of 9 Packet Pg. 197 8.1.d provide a way to track tree removals over time. Prior Planning Board considerations for property owner tree removals are to keep it simple, prohibit tree removal in critical areas, and limit larger tree removals. Board Member Mitchell asked if they are tracking by neighborhood or area. Ms. Powers explained that the TRAKit software tracks permit activity by parcel and would need to check if it can be queried for removal information by area. Ms. Powers reviewed the Planning Board's previous leaning toward allowing two landmark trees (24" DBH or larger) per 12-months. Replacement trees could be triggered when the property owner has the last two or three trees on the property. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell said she strongly supports requiring a permit and replacement (3:1) for removal of any landmark trees. She does not want landmark trees under the allowance. She feels this is where there is consensus with public comments they have heard. Chair Gladstone agreed and asked if there is a way to incentivize the replacement of the types of trees they want to see. Maybe have a 2:1 replacement? Staff replied that 3:1 replacement requirements are consistent with the current development code. Board Member Martini asked who pays for the replacement. Staff replied that the property owner pays for the removal and the replacement. What happens if it's a hazard tree that needs to come down and somebody can't afford the 3:1 replacement. Ms. Powers explained that under the current code, hazardous or a nuisance tree removal outside critical areas do not have replacement requirements. Under the proposed allowance approach, there is no permit or arborist report cost but under a hazard or nuisance tree removal permit, documentation by a certified arborist is required and is subject to staff review. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell clarified that she thought anything that is hazardous or nuisance should not require a permit or replacements. Staff clarified that a permit would be required for hazard or nuisance tree removals over and above the allowance. For trees removed under the allowance, no permit would be involved, and the board has considered mandatory minimums to address replacements. Board Member Golembiewski said her concern about requiring a permit for landmark trees is that it would take away the opportunity for someone to remove a hazard tree without the expense to do so. She thought if they could allow removal of one landmark tree every three or five years as part of the tree allowance it could help with the equity and affordability issue. Board Member Maxwell agreed and added that his understanding of a reason to have an allowance is that it would allow low-income families to remove nuisance and hazard trees without any costs as long as they are within the allowance. On top of that he is concerned that they have a $325 fee for a permit because it involves some sort of evaluation, but what is the evaluation in this situation? Board Member Kuehn suggested they could possibly make it more economically feasible for low-income families if that is something they want to do, but he had concerns about making it easier to remove landmark trees unless they are hazardous or nuisance. Chair Gladstone noted that equity can be achieved in different ways than just code. She suggested that the City could have a fund that pays for permits for low-income residents. She was concerned about just allowing landmark trees to be included in the allowance because of equity because they then forego the balance of taking Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 13, 2023 Page 4 of 9 Packet Pg. 198 8.1.d care of the canopy. Maybe they need to be more creative about how they accomplish the equity and allow for ease of removal of the hazard trees since that is what they are really concerned about. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell agreed with Chair Gladstone. She wondered about having the permit for hazardous trees potentially be free so you have to go through the process but there is no charge for it. The hazard/nuisance tree is a different topic to her than the healthy landmark tree. She asked the Board's thoughts on healthy landmark trees. MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER KUEHN, THAT THE TREE CODE IS UPDATED TO REFLECT THAT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ANY TREES OF 24" DBH OR GREATER ARE NOT INCLUDED IN TREE REMOVAL ALLOWANCES AND WOULD REQUIRE A PERMIT AND REPLACEMENTS IN ORDER TO BE REMOVED. Board Member Maxwell spoke against the motion and said he was in support of having different allowances for the larger trees than they have for the smaller trees. To him, this hasn't dealt with the problems that were brought up about equity. MOTION FAILED. Board Member Golembiewski suggested having an allowance to remove one landmark tree every three years. Board Member Maxwell referred to public comments by Larry Williamson and Bill Phipps and suggested an allowance of three trees that are 12" or larger every 36 months. For larger trees such as landmark trees and up, the allowance would be one tree per 36 months. The landmark tree would count toward the total of three per 36 months. Ms. Powers spoke to the decrease in code effectiveness and difficulty in administration when there are multiple timeframes for different sized trees and when timeframes are over 12 months. She discussed the Shoreline code as an example how 4 trees on an 8,000 square foot lot could be removed all at the same time, even with a 36 month timeframe and discussed various ways to look at this. Board Member Mitchell recommended just starting somewhere, tracking tree removals, and looking at this again in the near future to evaluate how it is working. Board Member Maxwell said it was his understanding that was what they were doing. Board Member Golembiewski recommended allowing three "regulated" trees over 12" DBH every three years or one landmark tree over 24" DBH every three years. There was further discussion about the complexities of having an extended timeline applied to different tree sizes. Would it be a rolling three years or a set three years? Chair Gladstone asked about the tradeoff from a canopy management standpoint of protecting the 6" and above trees versus starting at the 12" and up trees. Ms. Powers explained that Edmonds canopy data wasn't that detailed yet and spoke to the importance of getting something on the books so they can begin to track this. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell spoke in support of the 12-month allowance as opposed to the 36-month allowance. She pointed out you are far more likely to see a change in ownership in a 36-month period versus a Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 13, 2023 Page 5 of 9 Packet Pg. 199 8.1.d one-year period. She thinks a 12-month timeframe would be easier for both the consumer and the City. Ms. Powers noted that the removals, whether as allowance or permit are tied to the parcel and not necessarily the property owner. Board Member Kuehn also was in favor of the 12-month time period. He asked if the system would allow one tree removal per 12-months, but if it's a landmark tree, you can't take another one out for a certain period of time. Ms. Powers noted that could work under a 1-per 12 month allowance that applies to trees at least 6" DBH, without a permit or replacements and that additional landmark tree removals would require a permit with an extended time and replacement requirements. Mr. Clugston thought they could make that work. Board Member Golembiewski suggested increasing the size of landmark trees to something bigger than 24" and still making them permit required. This might be a good compromise. She also asked that the size of landmark trees in the definition be based on a single trunk. She suggested that they also clarify the definition to reflect what they are really concerned about. Do they want to protect conifers? Native trees? Ms. Powers noted that the current DBH definition for multiple-trunked trees is already a proposed code change to follow industry standards. She thought that regulating tree removals based on retaining desired species would increase code complexity and its administration. MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, TO DEFINE LANDMARK TREES AS 28 INCHES OR GREATER WITHIN A SINGLE TRUNK, THAT THOSE TREES WOULD REQUIRE A PERMIT AND REQUIRE REPLACEMENTS, AND THAT THE BOARD CONTINUE TO EXPLORE OPTIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR FINANCIAL EQUITY TO DEAL WITH THE VARIETY OF ISSUES SUCH AS PERMIT FEES AND REPLACEMENTS. Board Member Maxwell recommended that the permit fee should be used for inspecting the replacement trees. Chair Gladstone did not think the Board had the authority to specify what the City should be charging fees for. Board Member Kuehn thought this was getting closer. Taking care of the landmark trees is a huge issue for the residents of Edmonds. Chair Gladstone said she was weighing the public education needs that would be required with changing the size from 24 to 28 inches and other implications of the size of the tree that may affect the loss of canopy cover. She wondered about including landmark trees in the allowance but only allowing one tree above significant per year. Student Representative Distelhorst asked about the rationale for making the size bigger since it counteracts the goal of trying to prevent people from cutting down larger trees. She thought they should keep the size for landmark trees the same and noted that people are already familiar with this size. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell explained that she agrees that 24 inches is an appropriate size, but her rationale for changing the definition of landmark trees to a larger size is to make it more palatable to everybody. Board Member Kuehn asked how the permit process works. Ms. Powers explained the main difference from the allowance process is that the permit requires staff review and a site visit, which is why a permit fee is charged and that the timeframe can be different from the allowance and it ensures that the replacements happen. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 13, 2023 Page 6 of 9 Packet Pg. 200 8.1.d Currently, permits for tree removal in critical areas, street trees, commercial, multifamily properties and vacant lots all require a site visit. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell commented on some quick research she had just done that a 24-inch DBH Douglas Fir would be about 120 years old based on a standard growth factor. She commented that there would not be many trees bigger than that since most of Edmonds is second growth forest. In order to get closer to a decision, Chair Gladstone asked if the Board would rather have one tree allowance that allows the landmark trees or have them permitted. Board Member Golembiewski said she would be in favor of two trees per year with a permit required for landmark trees. A big concern she had about landmark trees is adding the multiple trunks together. If that is rectified, she feels better about permitting landmark trees. She thinks a good definition of what they are trying to protect is important. Board Member Nutsch said she really likes separating out the landmark trees into a permit, noting that there are not many of them left. She thinks having landmark trees included in the allowance is inviting people to try to sneak it in. Chair Gladstone recommended concluding the discussion for tonight and asking staff to come back with a definition of landmark trees and the revised development code language regarding measuring multiple trunks. Board Member Maxwell commented that for critical areas if the slope is less than 25% you can cut the trees down, and he doesn't think that is a good idea. Also, in section 23.10.040 it appears to say that the limit for the allowance doesn't apply to invasive trees, and people are welcome to cut down invasive trees as much as they like. He doesn't approve of that either. Ms. Powers explained that "invasive" is defined by Washington State and county noxious weed boards for different levels of control. Board Member Maxwell said he was comfortable with allowing compliance with what is required to be cut down but he is not comfortable cutting down something that is stabilizing landscape and providing canopy just because it is invasive. Chair Gladstone recommended adding this to a list of things to discuss in the future. Board Member Golembiewski asked the difference between developed properties and improved properties. She asked for clarification about if this code applies to property that has a house on it but could be subdividable. Ms. Powers explained the current definitions for improved lot and developable site and noted that we may need a new definition for a property of any size regardless of the presence of critical areas. Board Member Golembiewski said the way she was reading it was if you could subdivide your lot then you don't get an allowance. Ms. Powers noted that is why we need to define "developed property" . Board Member Golembiewski requested clarity on which properties this applies to and how the changing state regulations affect any of it. Are they addressing only what the situation is today or are they thinking about what the changing regulations will mean for developable lots? VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL RETRACTED HER MOTION. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell offered to chat with Board Member Maxwell offline about his invasive species management concerns. She noted that the way the code is written, it excludes sections of property containing critical areas. She added she has a lot of materials she can share with him on this topic. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 13, 2023 Page 7 of 9 Packet Pg. 201 8.1.d The discussion was continued to the next meeting. NEW BUSINESS None PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA Mr. Clugston informed the Board they have lost two staff members in the last two weeks — Planning Manager David Levitan and Associate Planner Michele Szafran - so they will need to make some changes in the upcoming schedules. He discussed the impact this will have on topics coming up. September 27 was supposed to be a discussion about the development tree code, but now it will be another discussion about property owner tree removals. The public hearing that was scheduled for October 25 will have to be bumped out. Chair Gladstone recommended trying to wrap up the property owner tree code on September 27 and starting the discussion on the development tree code on October 11. Mr. Clugston thought that would work. Chair Gladstone commented that Councilmember Olsen asked her about trying to have the Planning Board consider the vision statement. She asked Mr. Clugston about the status of that. He was not sure but indicated he could check on it. Mr. Clugston said he would try to adjust the schedule for the next meeting and bring it back with consideration of staffing challenges and all the projects they are juggling. He will be staffing the Planning Board for now. Chair Gladstone said she had been meeting with David Levitan every other week to discuss the upcoming agenda and extended agenda. Mr. Clugston indicated he could continue those meetings with her for now. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Student Representative Distelhorst discussed a scholarship program she did over the summer with Puget Sound Regional Council. Board Member Mitchell expressed appreciation to David Levitan and Michele Szafran and wished them the best in their new positions. Board Member Golembiewski concurred. Board Member Martini also wished David Levitan well. She said she appreciated that the Board had more time for discussion at this meeting. Board Member Maxwell said he appreciated how well they were able to work with people on Zoom tonight. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell welcomed Mr. Clugston back to the Planning Board and thanked him for filling in as staff liaison again. Best of luck to David Levitan. She thanked Ms. Powers for continuing to come back and give them as much information as she can. She felt like this was a really good meeting. She appreciates the Planning Board's patience with her as she tries to move them closer to a determination. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 13, 2023 Page 8 of 9 Packet Pg. 202 8.1.d Chair Gladstone said she would be out of town on October 11 and joining the meeting remotely. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell will be leading the meeting in person. She agreed with comments already stated tonight. She appreciated David Levitan's presence. He brought a lot of knowledge, was a good listener, and added a lot to the group. He will be missed, but thanks to Mr. Clugston for stepping in. She also appreciates Ms. Power's persistence with them knowing that it can't be easy for her with as long as the deliberations are taking. She knows this is an important and sensitive issue. It may make Council's job a little easier if they have a recommendation that is solid and well thought through. Thanks to everyone for the engagement. I\ DIJ111i1 sofa 1011a W The meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 13, 2023 Page 9 of 9 Packet Pg. 203 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 2024 Budget Public Hearing #1 Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Dave Turley Background/History The Proposed Budget has been available for two weeks, this is the first opportunity for Council to hear from members of the public in the form of a Public Hearing. This gives members of the public an early opportunity for their voices to be heard, so that Council members will have this information as they begin budget deliberations. Staff Recommendation Public Hearing only, no staff recommendation. Narrative N/A Packet Pg. 204 10.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Parkland Acquisition Purchase & Sale Agreement - Mee Property Staff Lead: Angie Feser Department: Parks, Recreation & Human Services Preparer: Angie Feser Narrative The City of Edmonds has the opportunity to acquire a one -acre property in Southeast Edmonds adjacent to Mathay Ballinger Park which will preserve existing open space and a well -established tree canopy, expand the only small park in the underserved southern area of Edmonds and support a trailhead for the regional Interurban trail. Two parcels, known as the Mee property (more information below and in attached presentation), will provide a significant expansion of Mathay Ballinger Park, the only city -owned park in south Edmonds. The shared 260-foot long property line provides easy access to the adjacent park and provides a seamless transition between the existing park and this property's heavily treed perimeter with an open lawn area. Mathay Ballinger Park has a playground, basketball courts and parking and currently in the permitting process for $450,000 improvements including a permanent restroom and water fountain, paved path through the park connecting to the Interurban trail, picnic shelter, benches and picnic tables. With these improvements slated for completion in 2024, the addition of the Mee property supports and expands a rarely found trailhead for the Interurban trail as well. With demolition of the existing small, older dwelling and two out -buildings having no contributory value, this site will become an important 55% expansion of an existing passive -use city park. The willing owner, who has resided for on the site 50 years, has asked a purchase price of $925,000 which is below the value provided from a city -ordered real estate appraisal. Funding The Parks capital program has more than $1,000,000 available for acquisitions and sufficient funding for the asking price and related costs. The city has received a preliminary funding award through a successful Snohomish County Conservation Futures Program grant application which will reimburse 75% of purchase price and acquisition related costs up to $880,000 pending County Council approval scheduled for December this year. Purchase & Sale Agreement Council's approval of the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) allows for up to 75 days (January 2024) for the city to perform due diligence such as a survey and Phase 1 ESA (Environmental Site Assessment). The PSA also allows time for the city receive confirmation of the Snohomish County grant funding by the end of the year. Packet Pg. 205 10.1 This parkland acquisition is supported by numerous goals, objectives and recommendations found the recently adopted 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan including - Goal #3 - Parks, Trails & Open Space: Provide an interconnected park system that offers a wide variety of year-round recreation opportunities and experiences which support and enhance Edmonds' cultural identity and the natural environment. Objectives #3.1, 3.2 and 3.7. Goal #5 - Natural Resource & Habitat Conservation: Conserve and provide access to natural resource lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education. Objectives #5.1, 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5. Recommendation #1 - Acquisitions to Fill Park System Gaps Sect. 1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas, such as the south Edmonds and the SR (Highway) 99 corridor. Recommendation #2 - Open Space and Conservation Acquisitions The City should continue to seek options to expand its open space holdings and pursue acquisitions that adjoin city properties or conserve unique natural areas, such as wetlands, forested areas and vistas. Recommendation #5: Trail Connections Sect 1. Pursue opportunities to acquire additional lands, easements and/or rights -of -way to continue the Interurban Trail, including more off -road segments. Sect 2. Repair and improve or extend trails and boardwalks to allow improved public access to natural areas for nature/ wildlife viewing, hiking, and outdoor experience. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Mee property. Background Basic property information includes - Parcel number: (West parcel) 00491100000805, (East parcel) 00491100000904 Address: 24024 76TH West, Edmonds, WA 98026 Owner: Gerald and Evelyn Mee Size: 0.99 Acre (0.87, 0.12) Zoning: R-8 Use Code: 111 Single Family Residence - Detached Utilities on site: Water (public), sewer Site location: Accessed off of 76th Avenue West at the western end of 240th Place SW. Conditions: Property is about 1 acre of land with an existing small, older dwelling and out- buildings having no contributory value. It has a flat, open lawn area and also located on the site are significant coniferous and deciduous trees, including a sequoia of substantial size and more than 20 significant and/or unique trees. The site is relatively flat, gently sloping down from northwest to southeast (6'). The site is not constrained by any mapped sensitive areas. Attachments: 2023.10.17 CC - Mee Property Presentation Purchase and Sale Agreement final agreed upon Signed by Mee 9-21-23 Packet Pg. 206 10.1.a c 0 Conservation Futures Program L a Mee PropertyCL 0 L (L m a� ti 0 City Council M pF EL) O October 17, 2023 E a Packet Pg. 207 10.1.a Overview Property City Park System Next Steps Level to gently sloping topography, view along southerly property boundary c2> a Mo 0 N v Z y�c. Ix9 M Q Packet Pg. 208 10.1.a Mee Property o= � kIp— I I,e ��Ea a=m••�o,.•a� ,. tso��e fD JJ Ly—od MEL Wood—y _ M- tyke Terrace Unincorporated Snohomish Co. �e� Q sho, h- 51ze:.`J`J Acre Property Zoned: R-8 location One house/two outbuildings Utilities on site: water, power, sewer d 0a d N M IL c O N 0 Q c O a c O c m W a� (L r- a) a O a m a� a � e � ti 0 Motivated Seller <11 N Threat of development Appraisal Complete v O Purchase &Sale Agreement Negogiated E Inc. 189�' M . � Q Packet Pg. 209 10.1.a Mee Property Property Highlights • Existing park -like setting • 260 LF of shared property line • Numerous and varied significant trees • Expands existing passive -use park by 55% • Provides additional access from east • Expands Interurban connection • Supports only Interurban Trail trailhead for miles o w c� c m W a� L a a� a 0 L a Views from property into Mathay Ballinger Park <4> Packet Pg. 210 Mee Propert rr Q Packet Pg. 211 City Park System Park System gaps Legend _�,�����ao e me�.= Puget Sound NP Lynnwood OIL 90,4% M Woodway 771� Mountlake Terrace Unincorporated Snohomish Cc Shoreline I Packet Pg. 212 1 City Park System 2022 Parks, Recreation &Open (PROS) Plan • Goal #3 - Parks, Trails & Open Space, objectives #3.1, 3.2 and 3.7 • Goal #5 - Natural Resource & Habitat Conservation, objectives #5.1, 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5 • Recommendation #1 - Acquisitions to Fill Park System Gaps • Recommendation #2 - Open Space and Conservation Acquisitions • Recommendation #5 — Trail Connections (7) Legend Q City Limits t/4-mile Travelstied to City Parks Y 1/2-mile TravelsNetl to Giry Parks e 1 /4-mile TravelsNetl to AccessiNe Open Space 9 Non-Clly Parks p ug e t S a u n tl 1/2-mile Travelsked to Axes 11 Open Space A Non -City Parks - Cky Parks Open Space & Spedal Use Areas _ Noncky Parks t � N—ky Parks w/ Inted..l Agreemems _ I s --rds Schaal OisZ Water @ "i — 14 -residential Zming i Lynnwood i t aaa nn. J 8 t Woodway a i k�.i Mountlake Terrace Unincorporated Snohomish Co.""" d � w., Shoreline a� 06 N W U a 0 .a Q M Y L M a r- N d a CL 0 a m Cm C U 0 M of EDM O G N r.i t Q Packet Pg. 213 10.1.a Wider Benefits Interurban Trail and non - motorized transportation Proximity to - • Mountlake Terrace (.5 mi) • Shoreline (.25 mi) • Mountlake Terrace Transit Center via trail (1.5 mi) Bike Lanes Interurban Trail Property C- K, N Q Packet Pg. 214 Funding Capital Improvement Program (CIP) /Capital Facility Plan (CFP) 2023-2028 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Project PARKLAND ACQUISITION 2023 X A2 Neighborhood Park SE 1 $ 1,500,000 Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds. Costs inflated at 3% per year 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 6-Year Total $ - $ - $ - 5 - $ - $ 1,500,000 X A3 Neighborhood Park SR99 $ $ 1,545,000 $ - Acquisition of parkland in near SR 99. X A4 Neighborhood Park SE $ $ _ $ 2,185,500 Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds. <9> I$ 1,545,000 I > 1 5 I S I$ 2,185,500 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) X Al Acquisition ofthe Unocal property in support ofgreater Edmonds Marsh TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD $ - restoration. AS Interurban Trail $ $ $ $ 5 $ 895,585 $ 895,585 Extension and acquisition (C) SUBTOTAL- PARKLAND ACQUISITION $ 1,500,000 $ 1,545,000 $ 2,185,500 $ - $ - $ 895,585 1 $ 6,126.085 2 Q Packet Pg. 215 10.1.a Funding 2023 Snohomish County Conservation Future Program (SCCFP) Grant • Successful application — SCCFP Board • Award of 75% of acquisition and related costs up to $880,000 • Appraisal • Due diligence • Closing costs • Demolition • Securing site • Awaiting County Council approval in December (10) Packet Pg. 216 10.1.a Next Steps Council approval of Purchase & Sale Agreement $30,000 Escrow Due Diligence (75 days) Site Survey Phase 1 ESA (Environmental Site Assessment) Confirmation of $880,000 grant award (December) Close on property January of 2024/take possession c r 0 L a CL 0 L a m m U U ti 0 M F ECM 04 O N v r-� a Packet Pg. 217 10.1.a Questions? d 0 Oa d N t V L IL c 0 .N Q c 0 L IL c 0 w c� L a m a 0 L IL as as c� c.� 0 ri N O N C E s R Q Packet Pg. 218 10.1.b REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN GERALD J MEE AND EVELYN M MEE AND CITY OF EDMONDS 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 219 10.1.b REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT THIS REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement') is made as of the day of , 2023 (the "Effective Date"), by and between Gerald J Mee and Evelyn M Mee, Husband and Wife ("Seller") and City of Edmonds, a Washington Municipal Corporation ("Purchaser'). ARTICLE I 1.1 Property Description. Seller owns that certain real property located at 24024 76th Avenue West, Washington, and as more particularly described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Real Property"). 1.2 Agreement of Purchase and Sale. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, Seller agrees to sell, convey, transfer, and assign, and Purchaser agrees to purchase, all of Seller's right, title and interest in and to the Real Property, together with all of Seller's right, title and interest in and to the following (collectively, the "Property'): (a) Real Property Rights. Any and all land lying in the bed of any street, road, highway or avenue, open or proposed, in front of, or adjoining all or any part of the Real Property, and all strips, gores or rights -of -way, lakebeds, streams, riparian rights, appurtenances, rights, licenses, and easements, in any way benefitting or otherwise in front of or adjoining all or any part of the Real Property (the "Real Property Rights'). (b) Improvements. Any and all buildings, fixtures, structures, landscaping, parking areas, improvements, and related improvements or amenities erected or located on, over, or beneath the Real Property (the "Improvements"). (c) Leases. Any and all leases of the Real Property, if any, including all leases, work letter agreements, improvement agreements, and other rental agreements with respect to occupancy or use of the Real Property by tenants, and such other leases, work letter agreements, improvement agreements, and other rental agreements as may be approved by Purchaser in accordance with the terms of this Agreement (the "Leases"). (c) Contracts. Any and all contracts, agreements, commitments, employment agreements, service contracts, utility contracts, construction contracts, maintenance agreements, leasing and brokerage agreements and all other contracts, agreements and obligations, whether or not in writing, which relate in any way to the ownership, development, operation, management, maintenance, use or occupancy of the Real Property (the "Contracts'). (d) Intangible Property. Any and all intangible property (other than the Real Property, Real Property Rights, Improvements, Leases, Contracts, and Personal Property) owned or held by Seller and used in connection with the ownership, development, operation, management, maintenance, use, or occupancy of the Property, including, to the extent such Intangible Property exists and without warranty or representation of any kind, without limitation, the plans and specifications relating to the Property, all engineering, soil, land use, pest control and all other non -confidential studies or reports relating to the Property, the Improvements and/or the Personal - 1 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 220 10.1.b Property, all pre -paid fees, utility agreements, and connections for water and sewer, if any, all rights to reimbursements and credits pertaining to the Real Property, including without limitation, all those from any governmental jurisdiction, all rights to development impact fee credits pertaining to the Real Property and the development thereof, all awards or payments made or to be made for or with respect to any taking in condemnation or eminent domain (including awards or payments for damage resulting from change of grade or impairment of access) of any part of the Property, the Improvements and/or the Personal Property prior to, on or after the date hereof, all rents, issues and profits therefrom and to the extent, if any, approved by Purchaser pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, all consents, licenses, franchises, permits, entitlements, approvals, utility and/or subdivision bonds or deposits, purchase or construction warranties or guarantees (the "Intangible Property'). (e) Sellers shall retain the right to remove any personal property, including any appliances, furniture, or furnishings whether inside the premises or outside on the Property. (f) Sellers reserve the right to remove any kitchen cabinets, whether the cabinets are fixtures or not. (g) Sellers reserve the right to remove any fencing on or around the Real Property (h) Sellers reserve the right to remove the brick from any pathways on the Real Property. 1.3 Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Property is Nine Hundred and Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars and no cents ($ 925,000.00) (the "Purchase Price"). 1.4 Purchaser's Deposit; Escrow. Within three (3) business days after the Effective Date, Purchaser shall deliver to the Everett, Washington office of Chicago Title Insurance Company located at 3002 Colby Ave., Everett, Washington 98201 ("Escrow Agent" or "Title Company"), a cash deposit in the amount of Thirty Thousand Dollars and no cents ($30,000.00) (which, together with any interest earned thereon, is the "Earnest Money'). Escrow Agent shall invest the Earnest Money in an interest -bearing account as instructed by Purchaser. The Earnest Money shall be applicable to the Purchase Price at Closing, except as specifically provided elsewhere in this Agreement. If the Closing does not occur as the result of a breach or default by Seller, all of the Earnest Money, and all accrued interest thereon, shall be immediately refunded to the Purchaser, and the parties shall promptly execute and deliver cancellation instructions to the Escrow Agent. ARTICLE II TITLE REVIEW; SELLER'S CONDITIONS 2.1 Title Examination; Commitment for Title Insurance; Survey. Within two (2) business day after the Effective Date, Purchaser shall order from the Title Company a commitment for an extended coverage A.L.T.A. Policy of Title Insurance (the "Title Commitment"), and copies of all recorded instruments referenced in the Title Commitment, if any. Purchaser shall have thirty (30) days after the Effective Date to examine title to the Property (the "Title Review Period'). Purchaser may, in Purchaser's sole discretion and at Purchaser's sole cost and expense - 2 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 221 10.1.b during the Title Review Period, obtain an ALTA or other survey of the Property as required to obtain extended coverage (the "Survey'). 2.2 Title Obiections, Cure of Title Obiections. (a) Purchaser shall have until the expiration of the Title Review Period to give written notice to Seller of such objections as Purchaser may have to any exceptions to title insurance coverage as disclosed in the Title Commitment. Any such exception to title disclosed in the Title Commitment to which Purchaser does not object by timely written notice shall be a "Permitted Exception." Purchaser shall not be required to object to any mortgage or deed of trust liens, the lien of any financing of Seller, any exceptions related to Seller's authority to convey the Property, and the same shall not be deemed Permitted Exceptions. Following delivery of the Title Commitment, Seller shall not alter the condition of title to the Property without the written consent of Purchaser. (b) In the event Purchaser gives timely written notice of objection to any exceptions to title, Seller shall have the right, but not the obligation, to elect to remove, satisfy or otherwise cure ten (10) days prior to Closing any exceptions to title or matters identified on the Survey so objected to by Purchaser. Within five (5) business days after receipt of Purchaser's notice of objection, Seller shall give written notice to Purchaser informing Purchaser of Seller's election with respect to such exceptions. If Seller fails to give written notice of its election within such five (5) business day period, Seller shall be deemed to have elected not to cure any such exceptions or matters. (c) If Seller elects or is deemed to have elected not to cure any exceptions to title or matters identified on the Survey as objected to by Purchaser or if, after electing to cure, Seller determines and provides written notice to Purchaser that it is unwilling or unable to remove, satisfy or otherwise cure any such exceptions or matters by Closing, Purchaser's sole remedy hereunder in such event shall be either (i) to accept title to the Property subject to such exceptions as if Purchaser had not objected thereto and without reduction of the Purchase Price, or (ii) to terminate this Agreement, in which case the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser by the Escrow Agent, and neither party hereto shall have any further rights, obligations or liabilities hereunder except to the extent that any right, obligation or liability set forth herein expressly survives termination of this Agreement. Purchaser shall provide Seller with written notice of its election pursuant to this Section 2.2(c) prior to the end of the Inspection Period. If Purchaser fails to provide Seller with timely notice of its election to terminate this Agreement prior to the end of the Inspection Period pursuant to this Section 2.2(c), Purchaser shall be deemed to have elected to purchase the Property in accordance with and as contemplated in this Agreement. Any exceptions to title to which Purchaser has objected and that Seller has elected or is deemed to have elected not to remove, satisfy or otherwise cure which is not otherwise removed from the Title Commitment or final Title Policy shall also be a "Permitted Exception." 2.3 Supplemental Title Report. If there are any changes or additions to the Title Commitment after the expiration of the Title Review Period, Title Company shall deliver to Purchaser a supplement to the Title Commitment (the "Supplemental Report'). Purchaser shall have the right to review and approve any new items appearing in the Supplemental Report. Purchaser shall deliver notice of approval or disapproval of the items set forth in the Supplemental - 3 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 222 10.1.b Report to Seller within five (5) business days after the delivery of the Supplemental Report. The failure of Purchaser to deliver notice of disapproval within said three (3) business day period shall be deemed to be Purchaser's approval of the Supplemental Report. In the event Purchaser delivers notice of disapproval, Seller shall have five (5) business days after receipt of Purchaser's notice to deliver notice as to whether Seller intends to remove, satisfy or otherwise cure any or all of the items in the Supplemental Report disapproved by Purchaser by Closing. Seller shall conclusively be deemed to have elected not to cure or remove each such item ("Disapproved Exceptions") for which Seller fails to notify Purchaser of its intention to cure or remove within such three (3) business day period. If Seller does not elect to cure or remove any Disapproved Exception within such three (3) business day period, Purchaser shall elect by notice to Seller within two (2) business days after expiration of such three (3) business day period to either (i) waive the Disapproved Exception, in which event the Disapproved Exception shall become a Permitted Exception (and failure of Purchaser to provide such notice within the two (2) business day period shall be deemed to be Purchaser's election to proceed under this clause (i)), or (ii) terminate this Agreement, in which case the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser by the Escrow Agent, and neither party hereto shall have any further rights, obligations or liabilities hereunder except to the extent that any right, obligation or liability set forth herein expressly survives termination of Agreement. Closing shall be extended as necessary to provide for the notice and response periods set forth above. 2.4 Conveyance of Title. At Closing, Seller shall convey and transfer to Purchaser title to the Property by Deed (as deemed in Section 4.2(a) subject only to the Permitted Exceptions and the standard preprinted exceptions in the Title Company's standard form of owner's title policy. At Closing, Seller shall cause the Title Company to issue to Purchaser an A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (or the Title Company's irrevocable commitment to issue such policy) in the same form as the Title Commitment, unless revised in accordance with this Agreement or otherwise upon Purchaser's prior written approval (the "Title Policy'), covering the Property in the full amount of the Purchase Price, subject only to the Permitted Exceptions and the standard preprinted exceptions in the Title Company's extended form of owner's title policy. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary specified herein, Purchaser shall be responsible for providing the Survey, delivering the same to the Title Company and providing any other information or documentation required by the Title Company in order for the Title Company to issue to Purchaser at Closing an extended coverage A.L.T.A. Owner's Policy of Title Insurance (the "Extended Coverage Conditions"). Seller shall deliver to Escrow Agent such additional documents as the Title Company requires from Seller in order to issue Purchaser the Title Policy, including, but not limited to, an owner's/seller's affidavit. ARTICLE III PROPERTY DOCUMENTS; PURCHASER'S CONTINGENCIES 3.1 Property Documents. Within three (3) business days after the Effective Date, Seller shall provide to Purchaser disclosure materials made available by Seller pertaining to the - 4 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 223 10.1.b condition and/or operation of the Property, including, without limitation, all Contracts, Leases, and written evidence of Personal Property and Intangible Property, land use permits, studies, analyses and entitlements related to the Property (collectively, the "Property Documents"). 3.2 Inspection Period. Commencing on the Effective Date and continuing until l 1:59 P.M., Pacific time on the date that is seventy-five (75) days after the Effective Date (hereinafter referred to as the "Inspection Period"), Purchaser shall have the right, at Purchaser's expense, to make physical inspections of the Property pursuant to Section 3.3 below. 3.3 Property Inspection Conditions. Upon reasonable prior notice to Seller, Purchaser shall have the right, at Purchaser's expense, to make physical inspections of the Property at times and at locations reasonably convenient to Purchaser in order to make the determination of suitability as provided in this Section 3.3, provided that such inspection activities do not unreasonably interfere with Seller's use of, or obligations relating to, the Property. In addition, Purchaser and Purchaser's representatives and authorized agents shall have the right, upon reasonable prior notice to Seller, to enter on the Property from the Effective Date to the Closing Date (defined below) or the earlier termination of this Agreement, to undertake inspections and investigations and make such tests, surveys and other studies of the Property as Purchaser deems appropriate, provided that such inspections, investigations or tests do not unreasonably interfere with Seller's use of, or obligations relating to, the Property. Purchaser's physical inspection and testing activities of the Property shall be conditioned upon the following: (a) Purchaser shall cooperate with and adhere to all reasonable requirements of Seller that affect the timing of all such activities; (b) Purchaser shall not conduct any drilling or other invasive testing on the Property without the prior written consent of Seller, not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; provided, however, that Purchaser may perform a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment; and (c) Seller shall provide Purchaser and Purchaser's representatives with reasonable access to the Property at reasonable business hours for such purposes; (d) prior to any entry upon the Property, Purchaser shall provide Seller with proof of commercial general liability insurance on an occurrence basis (CG 11-93 form including ISO 2010 11-85 or equivalent, if available) with limits not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury or property damage and $2,000,000 aggregate, and naming Seller as additional insured; (e) Purchaser shall bear the entire cost of all tests and studies performed by Purchaser or at Purchaser's direction; and (f) Purchaser agrees at its sole cost to restore the Property to substantially the condition it was in immediately prior to such inspections, including, but not limited to the immediate removal of anything placed on the Property in connection with such inspections (Sections 3.3(a) - (f) shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Property Inspection Conditions"). Seller shall permit and provide access for Purchaser, at Purchaser's sole cost and expense, to contact and have discussions with any contractors or consultants who have performed any work or inspections relating to the Property, and Seller shall permit Purchaser to contact and discuss development of the Property with the permitting jurisdiction and all relevant governmental agencies. For the avoidance of doubt, Purchaser shall pay all fees, costs and expenses of any contractors or consultants contacted by Purchaser as contemplated herein. Following Seller's written request, copies of any reports, letters or other written information, if any, generated as a result of such inspections shall be provided to Seller if the sale contemplated by this Agreement does not close for any reason. 3.4 Property Indemnity Conditions. Purchaser shall defend, indemnify and hold Seller and the Property harmless from any and all costs, expenses, claims, losses, liabilities and - 5 - 145960583A Packet Pg. 224 10.1.b demands arising from the exercise of these rights referred to in this Section 3.4, except with respect to Property conditions that existed before Purchaser's exercise of these rights (but, with respect to any such pre-existing conditions, Purchaser's indemnification obligations shall include any liabilities and expenses arising out of the exacerbation of such conditions caused by Purchaser's activities). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Purchaser's liability under this Section 3.4 shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 3.5 Right of Termination. Seller agrees that in the event Purchaser determines (such determination to be made in Purchaser's sole discretion, and which may be made for any reason or no reason at all) that the Property is not suitable for Purchaser's purposes, then Purchaser shall have the right to terminate this Agreement prior to the expiration of the Inspection Period. If Purchaser fails to give a notice of approval of its review of the Property ("Approval Notice") to Seller within the Inspection Period, Purchaser shall be deemed to have elected to terminate this Agreement and the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser. If Purchaser does deliver to Seller the Approval Notice prior to the expiration of the Inspection Period, the Earnest Money shall be non-refundable and applicable towards the Purchase Price, except as otherwise expressly provided herein and this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 3.6 Seller Disclosure Statement. The Property constitutes "improved residential property" as defined in RCW 64,06.005. Pursuant to RCW 64.06.020, Seller shall provide to Purchaser the seller disclosure statement required pursuant thereto, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B (the "Disclosure Statement"). The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the Disclosure Statement shall be considered part of this Agreement. 3.7 Purchaser's Council Approval Contingency. Purchaser's performance under this Agreement is contingent on approval by resolution of the purchase of the Property by the Edmonds City Council ("Council Approval Contingency"). The Council Approval Contingency will be satisfied only if the Edmonds City Council (the "Council") adopts a resolution approving the purchase of the Property pursuant to the terms of this Agreement ("Resolution") no later than seventy-five (75) days after the Effective Date ("Council Approval Period"), (a) If the Council does not adopt this Resolution within the Council Approval Period, this Agreement and all of the City's obligations hereunder shall be rendered null and void and the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser. (b) If the Council does adopt this Resolution prior to the expiration of the Council Approval Period, the Earnest Money shall be non-refundable and applicable towards the Purchase Price, except as otherwise expressly provided herein and this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. ARTICLE IV CLOSING 4.1 Time and Place. (a) The consummation of the transactions contemplated hereunder ("Closing") shall occur on a date mutually agreed upon by Seller and Purchaser, but not later than the date that is thirty (30) days after the date on which Purchaser delivers the Approval Notice pursuant to - 6 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 225 10.1.b Section 3.5 and the Council Approval has been issued pursuant to Section 3.7 (the "Closing Late'). 4.2 Seller's Obligations at Closing. On or before the Closing Date, Seller shall: (a) Deliver to Escrow Agent a duly executed Statutory Warranty Deed (the "Deed") in recordable form, conveying the Real Property to Purchaser, subject only to the Permitted Exceptions; (b) Deliver to Escrow Agent such evidence as the Title Company may reasonably require as to the authority of the person or persons executing documents on behalf of Seller; (c) Delivery to Escrow Agent an affidavit duly executed by Seller stating that Seller is not a "foreign person" as defined in the Federal Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax; (d) Immediately after completion of the Closing, deliver to Purchaser possession and occupancy of the Property, subject only to the Permitted Exceptions; and (e) Deliver to Purchaser and Escrow Agent such additional documents as shall be reasonably required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement, including a standard Title Company form of owner's affidavit, but Seller makes no representation that the Title Company will be able to issue extended coverage to Purchaser and the Closing is not contingent on Purchaser being able to obtain extended coverage. 4.3 Purchaser's Obligations at Closina. On or before the Closing Date, Purchaser shall: (a) Pay to Escrow Agent the full amount of the Purchase Price as increased or decreased by prorations and adjustments as herein provided, less the Earnest Money, and less interest accrued thereon, by wire transfer of immediately available federal funds; (b) Deliver to Escrow Agent and Seller such evidence as the Title Company may reasonably require as to the authority of the person or persons executing documents on behalf of Purchaser; and (c) Deliver to Escrow Agent and Seiler such additional documents as shall be reasonably required to consummate the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. 4.4 Credits and Prorations. Real estate property taxes shall be apportioned with respect to the Property as of 12:01 a.m., on the Closing Date, as if Purchaser were vested with title to the Property during the entire day upon which Closing occurs. Any taxes paid at or prior to Closing shall be prorated based upon the amounts actually paid. If taxes and assessments for the current year have not been paid before Closing, Seller shall be charged at Closing an amount equal to that portion of such taxes and assessments which relates to the period before Closing and Purchaser shall pay the taxes and assessments prior to their becoming delinquent. To the extent that the actual taxes and assessments for the current year differ from the amount apportioned at - 7 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 226 10.1.b Closing, the parties shall make all necessary adjustments by appropriate payments between themselves within thirty (30) days following Closing when such final amounts are known. 4.5 Closine Costs. (a) Seller shall pay (i) the fees of any counsel representing Seller in connection with this transaction; (ii) one-half ('/z) of any escrow fee which may be charged by the Escrow Agent or Title Company; (iii) the standard coverage portions of the Title Policy to be issued to Purchaser by the Title Company at Closing; and (iv) any real estate commissions owed by Seller pursuant to Section 8.1 below. (b) Purchaser shall pay (i) the fees of any counsel representing Purchaser in connection with this transaction; (ii) the extended coverage portion of the Title Policy to be issued to Purchaser by the Title Company at Closing as well as any additional endorsements issued by the Title Company; (iii) one-half ('/z) of any escrow fees charged by the Escrow Agent or Title Company; and (iv) the cost of any recording fees for recording the Deed. (c) All other costs and expenses incident to this action and the Closing shall be apportioned by the parties equally in accordance with local custom. ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, COVENANTS AND INDEMNITIES 5.1 Representations and Warranties of Seller. Seller hereby makes the following representations and warranties to Purchaser as of the Effective Date and at Closing, except as otherwise disclosed to Purchaser in the Property Documents or discovered by Purchaser in connection with its inspections during the Inspection Period: (a) Authority and Ownership. Seller has the full right and authority to enter into this Agreement, to transfer all of the Property to Purchaser, and to consummate, or cause to be consummated, the transactions contemplated herein. The person or persons signing this Agreement on behalf of Seller are authorized to do so. (b) Pending Actions. To Seller's actual knowledge, there are no actions, suits, arbitrations, unsatisfied orders or judgments, or governmental investigations pending or threatened in writing against the Property, or the transaction contemplated by this Agreement, except as disclosed in writing to Purchaser. (c) Leases. There are no parties other than Seller in possession of any portion of the Property or improvements thereon as lessees, licensees, tenants, claimants to any right of possession or ownership or trespassers. (d) Property Documents. The documents to be delivered to Purchaser under this Agreement, including the Property Documents, are complete and correct copies of the same. Seller has no actual knowledge of any other documents, correspondence, or other materials that could have a material impact on the Property except for the Property Documents. - 8 - 145960583-4 Packet Pg. 227 10.1.b (e) Outstanding Agreements. There are no outstanding agreements of sale, options or any other rights of third parties to acquire or use the Property or to any interest therein, except for the Permitted Exceptions. There are no contracts applicable to the Property that will survive Closing. (0 Hazardous Materials. To Seller's actual knowledge, there are no, and have been no, releases of Hazardous Substances on or about the Property. To Seller's actual knowledge, there are no pending proceedings or inquiries by any governmental body with respect to the Property. For purposes of this Agreement, "Hazardous Substances" shall refer to the definition provided under the Model Toxics Control Act, Chapter 70.105D RCW and Chapter 173-340 WAC, as amended or revised after the Effective Date. (g) Mechanic's Liens. There are no contractors, subcontractors, materials suppliers, or any other third parties that are unpaid, that have provided Seller with notice of a claim of lien, or that otherwise have any other rights to impose, enforce, file, record, or foreclose a lien against the Real Property pursuant to RCW 60.04 or otherwise. 5.2 Representations and Warranties of Purchaser. Purchaser hereby represents and warrants to Seller that Purchaser has the full right, power and authority to purchase the Property as provided in this Agreement, subject to Section 3.7 above, and to carry out Purchaser's obligations hereunder, and all requisite actions necessary to authorize Purchaser to enter into this Agreement and to carry out its obligations hereunder have been, or by Closing will have been, taken, and Purchaser has the financial capability to consummate the Closing. The person signing this Agreement on behalf of Purchaser is authorized to do so, subject to Section 3.7 above. 5.3 Indemnification by Seller. Seller agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Purchaser, its successors and assigns, members, managers, shareholders, officers, directors and/or employees of each of them, harmless for, from and against any and all claims, demands, liabilities, costs, expenses, damages and losses, cause or causes of action and suit or suits of any nature whatsoever, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees, arising from any misrepresentation or breach of any warranty or covenant by Seller in this Agreement. 5.4 Survival. The provisions of this Section 5 shall survive Closing and the delivery of the Deed for twelve (12) months. ARTICLE VI CONDEMNATION 6.1 Purchaser's Elections. In the event condemnation proceedings are commenced against all of the Property or any material portion thereof (and for this purpose, "material" is defined as a proposed condemnation which would reasonably be expected to be valued at more than Fifty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($50,000.00)) or would have a material adverse impact on Purchaser's intended development or use of the Property as communicated by Purchaser or Purchaser's Broker (as defined below) to Seller on or before the Effective Date hereof, Purchaser may elect, on notice to Seller within fifteen (15) days after receipt of notice of the commencement of such proceedings either: (i) to terminate this Agreement in which case the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser by the Escrow Agent, and neither party hereto shall have any further - 9 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 228 10.1.b rights, obligations or liabilities hereunder except to the extent that any right, obligation or liability set forth herein expressly survives termination of Agreement; or (ii) to proceed to Closing in which case Seller shall at Closing assign to Purchaser all of Seller's right, title and interest to any claims and proceeds Seller may have with respect to any condemnation awards relating thereto, less any costs and expenses reasonably incurred by Seller from the date of the commencement of such condemnation through the date of Closing relating to such condemnation. If Purchaser does not make such an election within fifteen (15) days after the commencement of condemnation proceedings, Purchaser shall be deemed to have elected to proceed under clause (ii) above. ARTICLE VII DEFAULT 7.1 Liquidated Damages. IF THE CLOSING IS NOT CONSUMMATED DUE TO ANY DEFAULT BY PURCHASER HEREUNDER, AND PURCHASER FAILS TO CURE SUCH DEFAULT WITHIN FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS AFTER PURCHASER'S RECEIPT OF WRITTEN NOTICE FROM SELLER SPECIFYING SUCH BREACH (PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE FOREGOING NOTICE AND CURE RIGHTS SHALL NOT APPLY TO PURCHASER'S FAILURE TO CLOSE ON THE CLOSING DATE), THEN SELLER, AS ITS SOLE REMEDY, SHALL RETAIN THE EARNEST MONEY AND EXTENSION OPTION FEES (IF ANY) AS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, WHICH RETENTION SHALL OPERATE TO TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT AND RELEASE PURCHASER FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY HEREUNDER, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT. THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED THAT SELLER'S ACTUAL DAMAGES, IN THE EVENT OF A FAILURE TO CONSUMMATE THIS SALE DUE TO PURCHASER'S DEFAULT, WOULD BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT OR IMPRACTICABLE TO DETERMINE. AFTER NEGOTIATION, THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED THAT, CONSIDERING ALL THE CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING ON THE DATE OF THIS AGREEMENT, THE AMOUNT OF THE EARNEST MONEY AND EXTENSION OPTION FEES IS A REASONABLE ESTIMATE OF THE DAMAGES THAT SELLER WOULD INCUR IN SUCH EVENT. EACH PARTY SPECIFICALLY CONFIRMS THE ACCURACY OF THE STATEMENTS MADE ABOVE AND THE FACT THAT EACH PARTY WAS REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL WHO EXPLAINED, AT THE TIME THIS AGREEMENT WAS MADE, THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISION. THE FOREGOING IS NOT INTENDED TO LIMIT PURCHASER'S SURVIVING OBLIGATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ITS INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS, UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. 7.2 Seller Default. In the event of a Seller Default, Purchaser shall provide Seller with written notice of such default and Seller shall have five (5) business days after Seller's receipt from Purchaser of such written notice to cure such default, or if such default cannot be cured in such period, to commence the cure during such period and thereafter diligently complete such cure. If after such notice, the Closing fails to occur due to such Seller Default, Purchaser may elect to either (i) terminate this Agreement and receive the return of the Earnest Money and any Extension Option Fees paid to Seller; or (ii) commence an action against Seller for specific performance of its obligations under this Agreement. Any such action for specific performance must be commenced within sixty (60) days after the then scheduled Closing Date. In no event shall Seller - 10 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 229 10.1.b be liable to Purchaser for any lost profits or other consequential or special damages. If Purchaser elects to terminate this Agreement, (a) this Agreement shall not be terminated automatically, but only upon delivery to Escrow Agent and Seller of written notice of termination from Purchaser; and (b) Escrow Agent shall return all sums (including the Earnest Money and all interest earned thereon while held in escrow) deposited by Purchaser. As used in this Agreement, a "Seller Default" shall mean (i) the failure by the Seller to deliver the Deed; (ii) the failure by the Seller to discharge, satisfy, release or terminate the matters of record Seller is required to remove from title as set forth herein above; (iii) any material breach of representation, warranty or covenant of Seller hereunder, or (iv) the failure by the Seller to perform any of Seller's other obligations under this Agreement. ARTICLE V1II BROKERS 8.1 Brokers. Purchaser represents to Seller that Long Bay Enterprises Inc., ("Purchaser's Broker") is the only real estate broker that Purchaser has engaged or dealt with in connection with this transaction, and that Purchaser will compensate Purchaser's Broker pursuant to a separate agreement. Seller represents to Purchaser that Seller has not engaged a Seller's Broker in connection with this transaction, and that if Seller does engage a Seller's Broker Seller is obligated to pay a real estate brokerage commission to Seller's Broker pursuant to a separate agreement. Each party shall indemnify, defend and hold the other harmless with respect to claims for real estate brokerage commissions or finder's fee for which such party is allegedly obligated. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Seller shall indemnify, defend and hold Purchaser harmless with respect to any claims by Seller's Broker for real estate brokerage commissions or finder's fees. The provisions of this Section 8.1 shall survive Closing. ARTICLE IX AS -IS PURCHASE AND SALE 9.1 At or before the end of the Inspection Period, Purchaser will have approved the physical and environmental characteristics and condition of the Property, as well as the economic characteristics of the Property. Purchaser hereby waives any and all defects in the physical, environmental and economic characteristics and condition of the Property which would be disclosed by such inspection. Purchaser further acknowledges that neither Seller nor any other person or entity acting on behalf of Seller, except as otherwise expressly provided in Section 5.1, have made any representations, warranties or agreements (express or implied) by or on behalf of Seller as to any matters concerning the Property, the economic results to be obtained or predicted, or the present use thereof or the suitability for Purchaser's intended use of the Property, including, without limitation, the following: the size or acreage of the Property; the suitability of the topography; the availability of water rights or utilities; the present and future zoning, subdivision and any and all other land use matters; the condition of the soil, subsoil, or groundwater; the purpose(s) to which the Property is suited; drainage; flooding; access to public roads; or proposed routes of roads or extensions thereof. Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that the Property is to be purchased, conveyed and accepted by Purchaser in its present condition, "AS -IS" and that no =0= 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 230 10.1.b patent or latent defect in the physical or environmental condition of the Property whether or not known or discovered, shall affect the rights of either party hereto. Any documents furnished to Purchaser by Seller relating to the Property including, without limitation, service agreements, management contracts, maps, surveys, reports and other information shall be deemed furnished as a courtesy to Purchaser but without warranty from Seller. All work done in connection with preparing the Property for the uses intended by Purchaser including any and all fees, studies, reports, approvals, plans, surveys, permits, and any expenses whatsoever necessary or desirable in connection with Purchaser's acquiring, developing, using and/or operating the Property shall be obtained and paid for by, and shall be the sole responsibility of, Purchaser. Purchaser has investigated and has knowledge of operative or proposed governmental laws and regulations including land use laws and regulations to which the Property may be subject and shall acquire the Property upon the basis of its review and determination of the applicability and effect of such laws and regulations. Purchaser has neither received nor relied upon any representations concerning such laws and regulations from Seller. Except for claims of fraud or willful misrepresentation on the part of Seller, and except for those representations and warranties expressly set forth herein, Purchaser, on behalf of itself and its employees, agents, successors and permitted assigns, attorneys and other representatives, and each of them, hereby releases Seller from and against any and all claims, demands, causes of action, obligations, damages and liabilities of any nature whatsoever, whether alleged under any statute, common law or otherwise, directly or indirectly, arising out of or related to the condition, operation or economic performance of the Property. ARTICLE X MISCELLANEOUS 10.1 Public Disclosure. Prior to Closing, any release to any third party, except for the Escrow Agent, the Title Company, the permitting jurisdiction and all relevant governmental agencies, or Seller's or Purchaser's attorneys, accountants, engineers and confidential advisors, of information with respect to the sale contemplated herein or any matters set forth in this Agreement, will be made only in the form approved by Purchaser and Seller and their respective counsel; provided, however, that Seller acknowledges that Purchaser is a public entity, that Purchaser will have already held public hearings concerning this transaction, and that Purchaser may be required to disclose or otherwise release information about this Agreement and this transaction pursuant to applicable public disclosure or other laws in the State of Washington. 10.2 Notices. Any notice pursuant to this Agreement shall be given in writing by (i) personal delivery, (ii) nationally recognized overnight delivery service with proof of delivery, or (iii) legible facsimile transmission sent to the intended addressee at the address set forth below and receipt confirmed by telephone, or to such other address or to the attention of such other person as the addressee shall have designated by written notice sent in accordance herewith, and shall be deemed to have been given either at the time of delivery or, in the case of facsimile transmission, as of the date of the facsimile transmission (or, if such date is not a business day, then on the next business day) provided that an original of such facsimile is also sent to the intended addressee by means described in clauses (i) or (ii) above. In addition, notice may be given by email at the email address set forth hereinbelow for the party to whom notice is given, and such notice shall be deemed given and served upon transmission so long as such notice is also given by no later than the following business day via a method provided for in (i) through (iii) above. Unless changed - 12 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 231 10.1.b in accordance with the preceding sentence, the addresses for notice given pursuant to this Agreement shall be: If to Purchaser: Angie Feser Angie. feser&edmondswa. og_v 425-771-0230 With a copy to: Jeff Taraday jeff@lighthouselawgroup.com If to Seller: Gerald and Evelyn Mee 24024 76th Ave W Edmonds, WA 98026 With a copy to: Joseph Rockne joseph@rocknelaw.com 10.3 Bindine Effect. This Agreement shall not be binding in any way upon Seller and Purchaser unless and until Seller and Purchaser shall execute and deliver this Agreement. The binding effect upon Purchaser is subject to Section 3.7 above. 10.4 Modifications. This Agreement cannot be changed orally, and no executory agreement shall be effective to waive, change, modify or discharge it in whole or in part unless such executory agreement is in writing and is signed by the parties against whom enforcement of any waiver, change, modification or discharge is sought. 10.5 Business Days. References to "business days" herein shall mean any day except Saturday, Sunday or day on which commercial banks located in Seattle, Washington, are authorized or required by law to be closed for business. If the Closing Date or the day for performance of any act required under this Agreement falls on a day which is not a business day, then the Closing Date or the day for such performance, as the case may be, shall be the next following regular business day. The final day of any such period shall be deemed to end at 5:00 p.m. Pacific time unless otherwise specifically stated. 10.6 Successors and Assigns. The terms and provisions of this Agreement are to apply to and bind the permitted successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 10.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including the exhibits and documents to be delivered at Closing, contains the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and fully supersedes all prior written or oral agreements and understandings between the parties pertaining to such subject matter. - 13 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 232 10.1.b 10.8 Further Assurances. Each party agrees that it will, without further consideration, execute and deliver such other documents and take such other action, whether prior or subsequent to Closing, as may be reasonably requested by the other party to consummate more effectively the purposes or subject matter of this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Purchaser shall, if requested by Seller, execute acknowledgments of receipt with respect to any materials delivered by Seller to Purchaser with respect to the Property. The provisions of this Section 10.8 shall survive the Closing. 10.9 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and all such executed counterparts shall constitute the same agreement. It shall be necessary to account for only one such counterpart in proving this Agreement. Fax copies of signatures shall be treated for all purposes as original signatures. 10.10 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. 10.11 Applicable Law. This Agreement is performable in the state in which the Property is located and shall in all respects be governed by, and construed in accordance with the substantive federal laws of the United States and the laws of the State of Washington. Seller and Purchaser hereby irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of any state or federal court sitting in the state in which the Property is located in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement and hereby irrevocably agree that all claims in respect of such action or proceeding shall be heard and determined in a state or federal court sitting in the state in which the Property is located. Purchaser and Seller agree that the provisions of this Section 10.11 shall survive Closing. 10.12 No Third Party Beneficiary. The provisions of this Agreement and of the documents to be executed and delivered at Closing are and will be for the benefit of Seller and Purchaser only and are not for the benefit of any third party, and accordingly, no third party shall have the right to enforce the provisions of this Agreement or the documents to be executed and delivered at Closing. 10.13 Survival. The terms of this Agreement shall survive the Closing, or any termination of this Agreement prior thereto, and shall not be merged into the execution and delivery of the Deed; provided, however, that the representations and warranties of Seller and Purchaser in Article 5 shall survive the Closing for a period of twelve (12) months. 10.14 Attorneys' Fees. In the event any dispute between Purchaser and Seller should result in litigation, arbitration or mediation, the substantially prevailing party shall be reimbursed for all reasonable costs incurred in connection with such action, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees. 10.15 Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in this Agreement and each of its provisions. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank; separate signature page attached.] - 14 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 233 10.1.b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. PURCHASER: By: City of Edmonds Name: Its: Date: SELLER: By: Gerald Evelyn Name: A n Its: Hu and and Wife Date: 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 234 10.1.b EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: For APN/Parcel ID(s): 004911-000-008-05 ALL THAT PORTION OF TRACTS 8 AND 9, LAKE MCALEER FIVE ACRE TRACT, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS PAGE 48, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 375 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9; THENCE NORTH 15 FEET; THENCE NORTH TO WEST LINE OF TRACT 9; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT 9,140 FEET; THENCE WEST TO EAST LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SEATTLE EVERETT INTERURBAN RAILWAY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO WEST LINE OF TRACT 8; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT 8 TO A POINT WEST OF POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST TO POINT OF BEGINNING EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD ON EAST SIDE TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF TRACT 9, MCALEER FIVE ACRE TRACTS, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 48, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT NORTH 2*32'33" WEST 530 FEET FROM THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9; THENCE SOUTH 88°06'2" WEST 300.14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 2°34'26" EAST 140 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°06'02" WEST 32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2°34'26" WEST 140 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°06'02" EAST 32 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. For APN/Parcel ID(s): 004911-000-009-04 THAT PORTION OF TRACT 9, MCALEER FIVE ACRE TRACTS, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 48, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT NORTH 2°32'33" WEST 530 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9; THENCE SOUTH 88°06'2" WEST 300.14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 2°34'26" EAST 140 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°06'02" WEST 32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2°34'26" WEST 140 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°06'02" EAST 32 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 235 10.1.b EXHIBIT B Form 17 SELLER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CCoprtgnt 2G19 Seller Dlurosuresulenlent IMPROVED PROPERTY Wkftte useng SeMce Rev. 7.119 ALL RIGHT RESERVED Page 1 offi SELLER_ 1 aw, ew. To be used in transfers of improved residential real property. inducing residential dweikrVs up to four units, new construction, 2 condor wows not subject to a public offering statement. certain timeshares, and manufactured and mabie homes. See RCW 3 Chapter 64.00 fur further rdormatlon. 4 INSTRUCTIONS TO THE SELLER 5 Please complete the following farm. Do not leave any spaces blank. If the question dearty does not apply to the property check B 'NA' If the answer a 'yes' to any astensked (') item(s). please explain on attached streets. Please refer to the line numbers) of 7 the queskon(s) when you provide your expfanataXs). For yw Protection you must dale and initial each page of this disdosyre 5 statement and each attacAhrnent Delivery of the disclosure statement must occur not later than free (5) business days. cress 4 otherwise weed, after mutual acceptance of a written purchase and sale agreement between Buyer and Seller 10 NOTICE TO THE BUYER t t THE FOLLOWING DISCLOSURES ARE MADE BY THE SELLER ABOUT THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12 CITY . 13 STATE . ZIP COUNTY rTHE PROPERTY-) OR AS 14 LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON THE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A_ 15 SELLER MAKES THE FOLLOWING DISCLOSURES OF EXISTING MATERIAL FACTS OR MATERIAL DEFECTS TO BUYER BASED 16 ON SELLERS ACTUAL. KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROPERTY AT THE TIME SELLER COMPLETES THIS DISCLOSURE 17 STATEMENT. UNLESS YOU AND SELLER OT14 RWISE AGREE IN WRITING, YOU HAVE THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS FROM to THE DAY SELLER OR SELLER'S AGENT DELIVERS THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TO YOU TO RESCIND THE AGREEMENT t9 BY DELIVERING A SEPARATELY SIGWD WRITTEN STATEMENT OF RESCISSION TO SELLER OR SELLER'S AGENT. IF THE 20 SELLER DOES NOT GIVE YOU A COMPLETED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, THEN YOU MAY WANE THE RIGHT TO RESCIND 21 PRIOR TO OR AFTER THE TIME YOU ENTER INTO A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT. 22 THE FOLLOWING ARE DISCLOSURES MADE BY SELLER AND ARE NOT THE REPRESENTATIONS OF ANY REAL ESTATE 23 LICENSEE OR OTHER PARTY. THIS INFORMATION IS FOR DISCLOSURE ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A PART OF 24 ANY WRITTEN AGREEMENT BETWEEN BUYER AND SELLER. z FOR A MORE COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION OF THE SPECIFIC CONDITION OF THIS PROPERTY YOU ARE ADVISED 26 TO OBTAIN AND PAY FOR THE SERVICES OF QUALIFIED EXPERTS TO INSPECT THE PROPERTY. WHICH MAY INCLUDE, 27 1NIT40UT LIMITATION, ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, PLUMBERS, ELECTRICIANS. ROOFERS, 25 BUILDING INSPECTORS, ON -SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT INSPECTORS. OR STRUCTURAL PEST INSPECTORS. 24 THE PROSPECTIVE BUYER AND SELLER MAY WISH TO OBTAIN PROFESSIONAL ADVICE OR INSPECTIONS OF THE 30 PROPERTY OR TO PROVIDE APPROPRIATE PROVISIONS IN A CONTRACT BETWEEN THEM WITH RESPECT TO ANY 31 ADVICE. INSPECTION, DEFECTS OR WARRANTEES. 32 SELLER ❑ LIU ❑ IS NOT OCCUPYING THE PROPERTY. 33 I. SELLER'S DISCLOSURES: 34 'If you answer -Yes' to a question with an asterisk ('), please explain your answer and attach documents, d available and not 36 otherwise publicly recorded. t( necessary. use an attached sheet. 36 YES NO 10Wt DMA 37 I. TITLE lOtOtfr 38 A_ Do you have legal authority to sell the property? If no, please explain... _ __ _ _ _ .D D D O 39 'B Is We to the property subjed to any of the blowing? i1D (1) First right afreit............ _............................ _ _ __. _-....__ _D D D 13 41 (2) Opt>ion._..................... ................ _.. _... _�. _._ _... ___... _ .__....D D Q L3 42 (3) Lease ar rental avednert .. _........ ,.._____..____.._._ Y _ ._- ........_ ---...D D 13 D 43 (4) Life estate? D D 13 44 'C. Are there any enaawcinents,bcurxWyaplehnMthlsorEywhdarydelpu4esT.__»_ __».__....._.D D D D 45 'D. is there a private road oreasemerttaWeernerhlfor aaoesr&IDffteprtipatijl?._._..__....._........_...D D n CI 46 'E. Are there airy rights# -way, easeanenm or access littitalons Itat may affect the Buyer S use of 47 theproperty? .. ..... ........ ..... .._......._........._...... ......__........ ..... ._,,.......... _----_....__.....__•-__..O ❑ I] ❑ 4E ' F. Arethere arty written agreements for joist mair4 enance of an easement or right ~.....____..O ❑ ❑ ❑ 49 'G. Is there arty spry. survey project or notice CA would adversely affect the property? ... __ ._.D ❑ ❑ ❑ 5i1 'H. Are there arty pending or existing assessments against the property(f ..»._ _.--- ..._ __ -_._ D ❑ ❑ D St SELLERS MITLALS Date SELLER'S t14TIALS Date 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 236 10.1.b Fore 17 SELLER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Selma DlscwAn,U*Trwr IMPROVED PROPERTY Rev. 7) 19 Page 2 col E (mil *CopyrX .9it 2019 etormwest lo ttsang uWce ALL RIGHTS RESERVED YES HD WF" RYA 52 WHOM 53 'l. Are there any zoning Violations, nor000r0onning uses, or any 11111= a11101 tCbonS oll *0 54 property that would a#ied futur construction or remodeling? ..._-------- 13 O ❑ ❑ ss 'J. Is there a boundary survey for the properW............................__.._................_....._0 D a 56 'K- Are there any covenants, corhditierws, or resbVbOns recorded a WISt she propeny'd ...... --.......... Al 0 ❑ ❑ 57 PLEASE NOTE. Covenants, conditions. and restrictions vouch purport to forbid or restrict the 58 conveyance. encumbrance, occupancy, or lease of read property to Indrvinuats based on race. =3 creed. color. sex, national origin. faimilial status, ordisabfty are void, unenforceable, and 60 ftal. RCW 40,60.224, 01 2. WATER 62 A. Hmsehold Water 63 (1) The source of water for the property is, ❑ Primate or pubhoty owned water system 64 ❑ Private wee serving arty the subject Property 013 Other wafer system as 'If shared. are there any written agreements? .... ......... ................... _._ .,._....._._ ......n ❑ CI ❑ 66 '(2) is there an easement (recorded or unrecorded) for arrows to andkw nftiAMWIFIM of fhe 67 water source? . ------------ --- ...._......... ...__........ 0 D 611 '(3) Are there any problems or repairs needed? ................. 69 (4) Wn yourow nesshp, has the scarce provided an a* ale ywea 4M1nd soppy d PQWe a _0 a a ❑ Im If no, please explain: 7t (5) Are there any water treatrnent systems for tte property? .......................... .0 0 ❑ n P2 If yes, are they: ❑ Leased :1Owned . 3 '(6) Are there any water rights for the property associated with its domestic water supply. such 78 as a water nghtpennkcertificate.ordarrh?___....-......_._,.-_.-..........__.___.._.._.--- ...... D a n n 75- (a) F yes, has the water right permit certificate. or dam been assigned, transferred, or charged? 7 ❑ 7 ❑ �6 '(b) If yes, has ad or cry portion of the water right not been used for five or rt,"e successhe years? 7 ❑ n ❑ 77 '(7) Are there any defects in the operation of the water system (e.9 Pipes, tank, Pump. etc.)? ... n D n ❑ 79 B. inigation Water 79 (1) Are there any rV3von water n#ft for the property, mic h as a rraler right pem*. 80 certific-ate. or cL-wn? ._..._.. 31 `(a) IS yes. has all or arty portion of the wAm right not been used for fine of more 82 su=ess4e years? ...__._.._.........._.._....._._. _..._ .__.... _... _... __ ... ___ _...❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 83 '(b) tf so. is the certificate avalabile? (If yes. please attach a copy.) ................ ❑ n ❑ lot '(c) If so. has the water right perm cerlificcale. ordain been assgned, kandterred, ordlunged? ...0 0 a ❑ as '(2) Does fie property receive rrigadan valer from a cl dh company. irigalion drstit, or otweren*p._..0 0 n a 86 If so. Please Kkn* tie entity that supplies wader to tthe protherly_ 5F ea C. Outdoor Sprinkler System a, (1) is there an outdoor spnrltiW system for the property?.».._......_.......»...._.r.__.._._.....___.»._.a a 3 3 90 '(2) If yes, are there arty defects in #* system? ....... '(3) If yes, is the sprinkler system connected to Irrigation water? __......__ w. _._.. _ ._..0 0 ] D 9< 3. SEWERION-SITE SEWAGE SYSTEM A. The property is served by g' ❑ Pork sewer system D On -sate sewage system (r vdudirg Apes. tanlis, dranfields, and all other oompiorrent parts) ❑ Other disposal system 9' Please describe: _ r, SELLER'S INITIALS Date SELLER',' INMALS Date — 18 — 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 237 10.1.b Farm 17 SELLER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 0Cogy" nt2019 Seller �.ti e� tl1 IMPROVED PROPERTY NoALL �L-RE:�RVEDCe Page 3 d6 t �) YES ND 00WT NW4 98 B 0 public sewer system service is available to the property. isUtle house connecled ko KNDW 99 thesewer main? .. .......... .......... ................ .......... ... ...... .................................... ..................... ..._...3 ❑ ] ❑ 100 11 no, please explain: 101 'C Is the property sutject to any sewage system fees or charges in addition to those covered 11112 in yourregularty bled sewer or on -site sewage system maintenance service?.... _ .........._...____.❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 103 D. If the property is connected to an on -site sewage system: 104 '(t) Was a permit issued for its construction, and was it approlred by the local heatdt to department or disc ict following its consbtac4on?.............__...............__ _-___._. ..._..__.❑ (3 ❑ ❑ 106 (2) When was it last pumped? 107 '( 3) Are there any defects in the operation of the on -she sewage wlrsietn? ......................... (4) When was it last inspected? ❑ ❑ M By whom: tic (5f For how mmy bedroom was tie on -see sewage sy'mm apVv ed? bedrooms O ❑ t t t E. Are all plumbing fixtures, including lautMry drain, eonnectied to it* sewedon-sde 112 sewagesystem? ..._..... ........._......,.._.,..... ....,........... ............... ....... ...._. ........ ...... _.-......_.._..fa O ❑ ❑ 113 If no- please explain: 114 IF. Have there been any changes or repairs to the on -site sewage system? ................ G. Is the art -site sewage system. induding the dtaimfieid, located entirely w iiin the 116 boundaries of the properiy?.____...._......._._.__...___..._....._.._._.__..__.._........_...._._...... _...,..___.❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 117 if no, please explain: 113 'H. Does tie on-sne sewage system mgre morrlorxg and m3rite-nance services more itegtlently 119 thanonce ayear?........................._............................ ......... ...... ........................ ............... ............ ❑ ❑ n ❑ 120 NOTICE: IF THIS RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY DISCLOSURE IS BEING COMPLETED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION 121 WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN OCCUPIED. SELLER IS NOT REWIRED TO COMPLETE THE QUESTIONS LISTED IN ITEM 4 122 (STRUCTURAL) OR ITEM 5 (SYSTEMS AND FIXTURES). 123 i_ STRUCTURAL 124 'A Has the roof leaked within the last 5 years? ______.. .___.._...__._...._.___.__.-._...._­_.,❑ ❑ n ❑ 425 IS Has the basement flooded or leaked? ................ ...... .... .......... ____ _....._ .__ ___._ ._. _ ___O O ❑ ❑ 125 'C. Have there been any conversions, atdditm or remodekq? .. _.. .._. '(1) of yes, were all budding permits obtained? ..__.___...... '(2) If yes, were all final inspections obtairted?.................... _.................. _____.........,.._____..o ❑ ❑ ❑ M D. Do you know the age of the house? ............ .......... ,.._..._...._.....____..........__ ._.............._____..O ❑ ❑ ❑ 130 If yes_ year of original construction- 131 'E. Has there been any settling, slippage, or sliding of the property or is impovernents? ...... O ❑ ❑ 132 IF. Are there any defects with the foifawing: (ff yes, please check applicable items and explain) .........13 ❑ ❑ ❑ 133 ❑ Foundations ❑ Decks 3 Exterior Walls 134 I35 ❑ Chimneys D Interior Walls ❑ Fee Alarms 136 ❑ Doors U Wrmlows 3 Pat,o 135 [3Ceilings ❑ Slab Floors :3Driveways 133 ts ❑ ❑ PooHot Tub :1 Sauna 10 ❑ Sidewalks ❑ outtmadi❑ Freptaces 14ngs ❑ Garage Floors ❑ Walkways 3 Siding tat1 ❑ Wood Staves ❑ Elrwalors ❑ Incline Elevators tit ❑ Stairway Chair Luis ❑ MYlreelrha tr Lifts ❑ Other 'G- Was a sttucMai pest or'whole house inspection dome? _-..._-_ .. 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ 143 It yes, when and by wham was the it gxxbw oompk & im 145 H. UrPest"estagm?....__..❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ too 1. Is the attic insulated? ............. 0 13 at47 J. is the baseatrertt insulated? _.________._.__.___ ____...__....__...______. _.._.___.__...__._._ —_.__❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 140 SEILER S HTIALS Dam SLUE" 111010" ¢Irate - 19 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 238 10.1.b Fate 17 SELLER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Mopyn9n 2019 Seiler Disclosure Statement IMPROVED PROPERTY I,4onhwest ►ltu%* useng Service Rev. If 19 kLL RIGHTS RESERVED Page t at 6 (Cued) YE3 NO DON'T WA ts9 5. SYSTEMS AND FIXTURES KNOW IM 'A It any of the totlow»p systems or fixtures are included arch the transfer, are the, any &-fees? 151 If yes, please explain: 152 Electrical system including vnrirtg, switches, outlets, and stwwice ..._ _...... _ ..._ D ❑ ❑ ❑ 153 Plumbing system, including pipes. faucets, hxhues, and Toilets............ ❑ ❑ ❑ m hbt wabef tank ........... ..»».__.._.....__........._».__.._.D D ❑ ❑ 155 Giarbage ❑ D ❑ 1% Appliances ....._._._...._._.n ❑ D ❑ 157 Sumppump -......_._.._.._.___._.»_....._.. ___........___... _ _ ,.----._ .».....___O O ❑ O 158 Heating and, systems .................... ❑ ❑ ❑ 159 Se -aunty syslem: O Oxned ❑ ❑ ❑ 160 Other.. .._._...._...-------�•--- ....._...0 D D ❑ 161 'B - 1' any ol the following fixures or property is indttded with the b refit ate Btey leased? 162 (if yes. please attach copy of lease.) 161 Security System D D ❑ ❑ 164 Tanks (type): _ ❑ ❑ D ❑ 165 Satellite rush: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 166 Other _ -.-❑ ❑ ❑ O 167 'C. Are any of the following kinds oil' mood burning appliances present at the property? 168 (1) Woodstove?............... ... .._..................... (2) Fireplaceinsert?..__.....__...__................_..._ .._......._______.........___...._.....»... _.._D ❑ D ❑ 17o (3) Pellet stove? ................... ..... __.............. _..._............. __._...... ... - -...CI ❑ ❑ O 171 (4) Fireplace? ..................... ...... ».............. ....... ,...._.........._..........._..._..»._..................... ... _.... D D ❑ ❑ 172 If yes. are all of the (1) woo&Aoves o►(2) fireplace inserts oerbT+ed by the U.S_ EEmkonnered 173 Protectim Agency as clean burmg appliances to uprose ail gtrafti y and partite health'? ._... ___❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 174 D. Is the property located within a city. county, or district or vWhin a daparlttead of rtaliral 175 resources fie protection zone drat provides fire Protection ❑ D ❑ 1-75 E. Is the property equipped with cabonmonatidealarms? Ohm. PursuaribRCW 1927.530, Seller 177 must equip the m-Adence with carbon monamle alarms as required by to stale building code-) 0 El D O 178 F. is the property equipped with, smoke delectiat devices? ................ --.--............ ..._.............. ____.a ❑ D ❑ 179 (We: Pursuant to RCW 43.44.110, d the property is not equipped with at least one smoke tea debecbon device, at Least one must be provided by the seller) 181 6, HOMEOWNERS* ASSOCtATIOWCO1M10MM1TERESTS 102 A. Is there a Homeowners' Associatieo? ....._......__-_____.__..__.___._....._._.....__...... _....(] D fl ❑ im Ran* of Association and mrracl iifottubon for an offica d reclot. employee. or otter &*armed 184 agent, if any. who may prove* the assmabon's frtancial shiernenAs, rrtihu0es, byta . If" loficy 185 and other i nfamhabon tot is not publicly available: 166 B. Are there regular periodic assessmerks? .......... ......... __.__...... S per ❑ month ❑ year 168 ❑ Other. tie 'C Are there any pending special assessments? _._.._............. _. D ❑ ❑ ISO D. Are there any shied 'common areas or any joi^t mairrlenarte! agr�rrrerres tTaclities t91 such as walls. fences. landscaping. pods. tennis taros. r 0 or COW areas 192 coowned in undivided inberestwith others)? 193 7. ENVIRONMENTAL 194 'A Have there been arty flooding, standing water. or drainage problems on the property 195 than affect the property or access to the property? ......................... D O D ❑ 196 IS, Does any part of the peopeety contain fir dirt, waste. or other fir rttalerial?_____ _ .»_...__ ....0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 197 'C. any damage to the property tram fire, wind, floods. beachnreverr+erll4s Is m�ake, 195 expansive sorts. or landslides? ._._... ............ D. Are there any shareiirtes, wetlands, floodpians, or critical areas on the property? ._..._.._._.._____.O ❑ ❑ ❑ 200 'E Are there any substances, materials, or pmd x*s in or on the property flat may be erwironmerilld 20t concerns, such as asbestos. formaldehyde. radon gas, lead -based paint, fuel or chemical 2Q2 storage tanks, or contaminated soil or water? ............................ ...... ❑ ❑ ❑ 203 IF. Has the property been used for commercial or industrial purposes? ............ ___ _. _. »..__.».O D D O 2M SELLERS INITIALS Date SELLEMS INITIAL-1 Dale - 20 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 239 10.1.b Pam 17 SELLER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT "rVt 2019 Seller DISCkrAre S13*1 It IMPROVED PROPERTY NOFVr'mM WAlple UsMig ''Vice Rev. 7,119 ALL MKI'S RESERVED Page 5 of (CormLkV1 1rF3 NO OOWi ti54 205 tllNm 206 'G_ Is there any soil or groundlYater tarrtarrunat+on?.---_.__...-..._.._.._.._.............._.........._.....-..__...I] ❑ ❑ ❑ 27 'H. Are there transmission poles or otter eleclriral utility equipmertt installed, rnairdainad. or 20B buried on the property that do not provide utility senioe to the st uckm on the pfapettr.__ -._.O ❑ ❑ ❑ 209 'I. Has the property been used as a legal or iltegal dumping site? ..... ____,____.___ _ .____._.L] ❑ ❑ ❑ 210 'J. Has the property been used as an illegal dug ri—Oachwing site? O ❑ ❑ 211 'K. Are there any radio lavers in the area that cause interference wilt ddMiar leleptwne reception?..____.0 O ❑ ❑ 212 S. LEAD BASED PAINT (Applicable tf the house was built before 1978). M A Presence of lead -rased paint arWor lead -based pant hazards (ohedt one below): 214t ❑ Known lead -based paint and/or lead -based paint hazards are present in the housing 215 (explain) 216 ❑ Seller has no knowledge of lead -based pant a nd7or lead -based pant hazards in the housing. 217 B Records and reports available to the Seller (check one below): 218 ❑ Seller has provided the purchaser wtah all available records and reports perlaining fa 219 lead -based paint andibr lead -based pant hazards in the housing (list documents below). 2M 221 ❑ Seller has no reports or records pertaining to le� pant ard'ar lead -based pal# hazards in the housing 222 9. MANUFACTURED AND MOBILE HOMES 223 it the property mdudes a mameactured or mobile home, 224 'A. Did you ruche any alterations to the home? ❑ D ❑ 225 if yam, please describe the alterabons: 226 'B- Did any previous owner make any atterations to the home? ...._. _....._. __... 'C. K alterations were made, were permits or variances for these altemilim dAaited? ._......._____..O ❑ ❑ ❑ 225 10. FULL DISCLOSURE BY SELLERS 229 A. Other conditions or defects: 230 'Are there other exile material detects affectingthe property that a prospective 231 buyershotidknowabaR .___.. ___. .,._..._ _. _..,....._...-.....__.. _......_...._......❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 232 B. Verification 233 The foregoing answers and attad*ed explarobms (f any) are con'Oebe and correct to the best of Sellers knowledge and tat Seller has received a copy hereof. Seller agrees to deJend. rxlerrniy and hold real estate licensees hatniess ban and 235 against cry and all darts that the above inforrnation is inaccurate- Seller authorizes real estate licensees. if a". to dleWer a 2M copy of this disclosure staliernent m other real estate licensees and all prospective buyers of the property. 237 23B Daft Seier DW 239 If the answer is Yes to any asreriskeo i') ferns, please exprain below (use additexr W sheets 0 necessary). Please refer to the We 240 rwrnb"s)ofit* quesbonis). 341 - 21 - 342 243 2!t 245 245 20 m 249 2W 251 252 m 2St 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 240 10.1.b Form 17 Seller DostloA" statement Rev. V19 Page 6 OF 6 It. NOTICES TO THE BUYER SELLER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT GCopytl¢1t2019 IMPROVED PROPERTY W'mweat Mur** Llsnrg �i1ce ALL RIGHTS RESERVED (CantlricreQ) 255 t. SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION ter, INFORMATION REGARDING REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS MAY BE OBTAINEO FROM LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 257 AGEI"iM. THIS NOTICE IS WENDED ONLY TO 94FORM YOU OF WHERE TO OBTAIN THIS INFORMATION AND IS NOT 255 AN INDICATION OF THE PRESENCE OF REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS. 2% 2. PROXISM TO FARMINCIWORKNG FOREST 2® TM NOTICE IS TO INFORM YOU THAT THE REAL PROPERTY YOU ARE OONSIDERM FOR PURCHASE MAY LIE IN 261 CLOSE PROXIMITY TO A FARM OR WORKING FOREST. THE OPERATION OF A FARM OR WORKING FOREST 252 hVOLVES USUAL AND CUSTOMARY AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES OR FOREST PRACTICES. WHICH ARE PROTECTED 20 UNDER RCW 7.48.305. THE WASHINGTON RIGHT TO FARM ACT. 264 3. OIL TANK INSURANCE 265 THIS NOTICE IS TO INFORM YOU THAT IF THE REAL PROPERTY YOU ARE CONSIDERING FOR PURCHASE UTILIZES Z- AN OIL TANK FOR HEATING PURPOSES. NO COST INSURANCE MAY BE AVAILABLE FROM THE POLLUTION LIABILITY 29 INS&1RAINCE AGENCY. 266 Itt. BUYER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 2% BUYER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT: 270 A. Buyer has a duty to pay diligent attention to any material detects that are lurovm to Buyer or can be known to Buyer by 271 utilizing di igem attention and observation. 272 B. The disdosures set birth in this statement and in any ,amendments to this sttal irnent are made only by the Seller and 213 not by any mai estate licensee or other party. 274 C Buyer acknoww6edges that, pursuant to RCW 64.06.050(2). real estate licensees are not liable bor uiaccurate mformaban 013 provided by Setter, except to the extent Its real estate licensees know of such inaccurate infortnation. Z75 D This ntrinatcon is for dadoscre only, and is not intended to be a part of the written agreement between the Buyer and Seller. 277 E. Buyer (wrhich term includes all persons signing the "Buyer's acceptance" portion of this disdosure statement beiow) has 278 received a copy of this D+scliosure Statement (indwryg attachments, rf any) bearing Settees sipnarctre(s). _179 F. If the house was bust prior to 1978, Buyer adawowwledges receipt of the pamphlet PmW YowrFamiy Fran Lead n Your Horne. 2W DISCLOSURES CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ARE PROVIDES BY SELLER BASED ON SELLER'S 291 ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE PROPERTY AT THE TIME SELLER COMPLETES THIS DISCLOSURE, UI%ESS BUYER 21C AND SELLER OTHERWISE AGREE IN WRITING. BUYER SHIV.L HAVE THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS FROM THE DAY 2M SELLER OR SELLERS AGENT DELIVERS THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TO RESCIND THE AGIVEEMENT BY Zest DELIVERING A SEPARATELY SIGNED VWME N STATEME14T OF RESCISSION TO SELLER OR SELLERS AGENT. YOU 2% MAY WAIVE THE RICER TO RESCIND PRIOR TO OR AFTER THE TIME YOU ENTER INTO A SALE AGREEMENT. 2% BUYER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COPY OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES 2St THAT THE DISCLOSURES MADE HEREIN ARE THOSE OF THE. SELLER ONLY, AND NOT OF ANY REAL ESTATE Zee LICENSEE OR OTHER PARTY_ 2% 290 evlw U. 291 2. BUYER'S WAIVER OF RIGHT TO REVOKE OFFER Buyer has read and reviewed the Setter's responses to Ovs Setter Disclosure Statement- Buyer approves this statement and m wravves Buyers right to revoke Buyer's of?er based on this disclosure. 294 fto. b" 295 2915 3. BUYER'S WAIVER OF RIGHT TO RECEIVE COMPLETED SELLER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 297 Buyer has been advised cf Buyer`s right io receive a completed Setter Disclosure Statement Buyer waives that tight. 295 However. if the answer ko any d the queskms in Ire section entitled 'Ertvitorrnentar would be 'yes." Buyer may not waive 299 the rie" of the "EtrvironnrmW* section of the Setter Disclosure Statement Jim SELLER'S FWTIALS Date SELLERS t16MLS Date — 22 — 3m �.r 3m 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 241 10.1.b NOTICE TO BUYER INFORMATION REGARDING REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. THIS NOTICE IS INTENDED ONLY TO INFORM YOU OF WHERE TO OBTAIN THIS INFORMATION AND IS NOT AN INDICATION OF THE PRESENCE OF REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS. II. BUYER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT A. Buyer hereby acknowledges that: Buyer has a duty to pay diligent attention to any material defects that are known to Buyer or can be known to Buyer by utilizing diligent attention and observation. B. The disclosures set forth in this statement and in any amendments to this statement are made only by the Seller and not by any real estate licensee or other party. C. Buyer acknowledges that, pursuant to RCW 64.06.050(2), real estate licensees are not liable for inaccurate information provided by Seller, except to the extent that real estate licensees know of such inaccurate information. D. This information is for disclosure only and is not intended to be a part of the written agreement between the Buyer and Seller. E. Buyer (which term includes all persons signing the "Buyer's acceptance" portion of this disclosure statement below) has received a copy of this Disclosure Statement (including attachments, if any) bearing Seller's signature. DISCLOSURES CONTAINED IN THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ARE PROVIDED BY SELLER BASED ON SELLER'S ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF THE REAL PROPERTY AT THE TIME SELLER COMPLETES THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. UNLESS BUYER AND SELLER OTHERWISE AGREE IN WRITING, BUYER SHALL HAVE THREE BUSINESS DAYS FROM THE DAY SELLER OR SELLER'S AGENT DELIVERS THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TO RESCIND THE AGREEMENT BY DELIVERING A SEPARATELY SIGNED WRITTEN STATEMENT OF RESCISSION TO SELLER OR SELLER'S AGENT. YOU MAY WAIVE THE RIGHT TO RESCIND PRIOR TO OR AFTER THE TIME YOU ENTER INTO A SALE AGREEMENT. BUYER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF A COPY OF THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE DISCLOSURES MADE HEREIN ARE THOSE OF THE SELLER ONLY, AND NOT OF ANY REAL ESTATE LICENSEE OR OTHER PARTY. Date: BUYER - 23 - 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 242 10.1.b EXHIBIT A to Disclosure Statement Legal Description ol'the Real Property For APN/Parcel ID(s): 004911-000-008-05 ALL THAT PORTION OF TRACTS 8 AND 9, LAKE MCALEER FIVE ACRE TRACT, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS PAGE 48, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 375 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9; THENCE NORTH 15 FEET; THENCE NORTH TO WEST LINE OF TRACT 9; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT 9,140 FEET; THENCE WEST TO EAST LINE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SEATTLE EVERETT INTERURBAN RAILWAY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO WEST LINE OF TRACT 8; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT 8 TO A POINT WEST OF POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST TO POINT OF BEGINNING EXCEPT COUNTY ROAD ON EAST SIDE TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF TRACT 9, MCALEER FIVE ACRE TRACTS, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 48, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT NORTH 2°32'33" WEST 530 FEET FROM THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9; THENCE SOUTH 88°06'2" WEST 300.14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 2°34'26" EAST 140 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°06'02" WEST 32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2°34'26" WEST 140 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°06'02" EAST 32 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. For APN/Parcel ID(s): 004911-000-009-04 THAT PORTION OF TRACT 9, MCALEER FIVE ACRE TRACTS, RECORDED IN VOLUME 5 OF PLATS, PAGE 48, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT A POINT NORTH 2°32'33" WEST 530 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9; THENCE SOUTH 88°06'2" WEST 300.14 FEET TO A POINT WHICH IS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 2'34'26" EAST 140 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88°06'02" WEST 32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2°34'26" WEST 140 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°06'02" EAST 32 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON. 24 145960583.4 Packet Pg. 243 10.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Year in Review / Decision Package Presentation Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Dave Turley Background/History Year in Review for the Parks, Recreation & Human Services (PRHS), Public Works, Community, Culture and Economic Development (CCED), and Human Resources Departments. Staff Recommendation Presentation only, no recommendation. For information and brief discussion purposes. Narrative N/A Attachments: 2024 HR Department Presentation CSED Budget Presentation OCT1723 Packet Pg. 244 HUMAN RESOU� 2023 Department Overview Human Resources Functions of the HR Department (High-level overview) • HR Planning: Aligning HR functions with the goals of the City • Recruitment/Hiring • HR assists with the full -spectrum of recruitment which includes: • Job description review • Building job postings • Conducting minimum qualification reviews • Supporting departments with interview processes as needed • Background checks • Review of job offers for compliance with policy or collective bargaining agreements • Production of offer letters • Onboarding new employees (benefits, personnel policy review, initial required training) • Compensation & Benefits • Administers the City's benefit programs • Processes all benefit paperwork • Reviews benefit offerings to ensure the City continues to be competitive • Currently manages 13 benefit lines Packet Pg. 245 n 10.2.a 2023 Department Overview • Health and Safety • Responsible for all employee safety issues • Manages all on the job injury claims • Works with claims manager to return the employee to work • Labor Law Compliance • Responsible for the City's compliance with all federal and state labor laws • Establish policies and bargaining agreements that ensure compliance • Areas include: working hours/conditions, harassment protections, equal employment opportunity, compensation, leave laws • Employee Relations • Assisting departments with employee and performance management issues • Addressing employee complaints and concerns • Conducting investigations „I Packet Pg. 246 1 10.2.a 2023 Department Overview • Labor Relations • Conduct bargaining for all 5 represented employee groups • Conduct all bargaining for issue that arise outside of the contract • Manage the City's responses to union grievances, unfair labor practice filings, and PERC hearings • Administrative Duties • Responsible for maintaining all personnel records • Employee personnel files • Investigatory files • Benefit policies and information • Risk Management • HR is also responsible for the Risk Management function of the City • Acts as the delegate to WCIA • Contact for claims and some litigation • Manages all outside insurance purchases • Provides risk advisement as requested by departments OF E DM cC a Packet Pg. 247 10.2.a 2023 Department Overview HR Statistics from January 2023 through September 2023 • Leaves Managed: 36 • This category includes FMLA, ADA Accommodations, Military Leave, and Bereavement Leave • L&I Claims Managed: 17 • Emergency Sick Leave Requests processed: 40+ • Jobs posted: 52 • Employees Hired: 67 • Employee Separations: 20 • Collective Bargaining Contracts Completed: 3 • Collective Bargaining Retroactive Pay implementations: 2 • This was a very large project that took up much of the HR Department's time OF E DM cC O�O � a Packet Pg. 248 10.2.a 2023 Decision Packages Questions? _ 0 r r a� m L a m E ca a m 0 o: x N O N _ d E s OF EDM O "- Q V N Packet Pg. 249 10.2. b Community, Culture, and Economic Development Budget brief 10/17/23 Todd Tatum, Director Community/Culture/Economic Development Organization Administrative Assistant (PT) Community Services Program Coordinator Economic Development & Community Services Todd Tatum Arts & Cultural Services Program Manager Cultural Arts Program Specialist Communications Strategist/Public Diversity Commission Information Officer Coordinator (PT) �y OF E DMO' cvC O w G N Q Packet Pg. 251 Neighborhood City Hall Front Desk Community Services Communications Rent Intergovernmen Relations Construction f Special Projects Space use and interdepartmental coordination DEIA Commission Community/Culture/Economic Develop,___'___' Economic Development LTAC Tourism ME Economic Development Commission Creative District Cultural Services Arts Commissioi WOTS Concerts Public Art Exhibits Tourism Promotion Creative District Neighborhood City Hall s The Neighborhood City Hall office continues to improve and evolve • Community Court is key component, using space for court and classes Human Services hold events in the space often, and draw people from across many demographics Space is used even when doors aren't open to the public for meetings with residents in need of Presence is appreciated by residents and businesses Community/Culture/Economic Develop,___'___' 2022 10 2023 1P 2024 Moving in Implementing Investigating alternate improvements spaces Modifying space Improving connections Working with Police on Getting to know the la future staffing of the land Expanding the Human Services programming Improving the Human Meeting people Services programming Expanding the Courts offered onsite Planning for the future programming Working with Court on 1 0 programming 9 Communications Press releases Newsletter Social Media Events Community/Culture/Economic Develop,___'___' Special Projects Relations obbyist MM[ ARPA Other governments Neighborhood City Hall and agencies: Lynnwood, Comm DEIA Commission Transit, WSDOT, SnoCo Community Events Community Services - Communications o= dmonds 'Ityofe 107 D, ro 40 1061 Following posts Followers �Ity of Edmonds hotos of our beautiful 0omrnunity 0fficiallnsta9ram dmonds and P City: E for news events, Follow us shin9ton city 1 1215th Pve N, Edmonds, Wa L•) www.edmondswa gov professional now dos'..' de a ..,.. the L nN0 W, • Launched Instagram account City of Edmonds - Common. © r.e q Posts • 95 press releases as of 10/10/23 About Videos More . City ons • • Translated 11 board recruitment ntnds- Community and • Se"' • Human Services Program • ZOSee notices into three languages (Spanish, EOMO Manager Mind //// NOS CITY � COM mo of Edmonds Employee of the Year:: � l I�IL1111y1 / MUNITy UppATESI PALI�E Korean, Chinese) ARLy WINftftftftftlft—TER 2023 EDMONDS'"'MA' Program SERVICES • Reach 21K households via print Mono ROCKS! Awarded Em 9er Mintly W beYo�ae°"S`r„«a Di„sion o/they Qds ver Y Provi 6 ve �ro�d°r newsletter • Produced in person State of the City, 2 WOR0MIMAYOR Y / W MIK E fOME 7 ` heroin mis umeo �,' �nayn„r,.xY .� E "roa Ikea O EDMO " %lhr i Nauawre r e l aronm oroa""wnleem'r;wneuwm NDS! simulcast online and TV ourlaPan^"Innd`"yr<ar �� nacre%xeu "'9 ,"r °rry lawn a<r r. rkne: rrom - "eba°°°'°'aPa°.�°""°'b°,mb" ; 9Wrryy°cirµy' am and lh�4Pa�1n IViI„In<Nardy°M"e lot � �n'lill H !coda 11-Oersan raa"qrM marryw T^'<Li8ndn8 ceiaN°v<mber aM I' an \�� �1 Ilonaflhe mbe,aln. rN+u later • Produced promotional video for new ralmare„nW trrr� ax ud"e9d1io°rro'0m4 For andyo°�mY � <h that month, h„r°8 nle ma ",lal L :binh.lnx Ym<nm< ,v°"`P' aneadnnmh<au' 'won a� holidaye` --- 'Markecand M kollp j�,me nearoY/a 5mi ten ror < aional Thinks hdi - rkebgnter Dainln Museumhyolsil "ke Pyre an<rk onbre byodln8'hos<w{,�m nandlov<dWl' Wbll<arlln0 9(enpr. IAe ra9lowlorsimj�bonw ayn<�"�° Fix It app arp vevilie °PY"aa"m°a° m whn;° „ nyn,�me wr"araro "e'siv<loalo rkwnr bar fe ^xwngl ^roll mr°ngh bwn, "mmin8 h ' xallo 'M'ba0a1 aPNlp( mm�drarea we 'llw Increased local and regional news rat ve ln[ lh< ' aw`Mn, wlipivlairea kO:xily °Ms, andoura<8 e°I war to ludedin lhixa".winkr As weaonw h'<s We �Pnur n<igh 'Our tore tobinHo AeeO�l�^9sllq'i Be°�WM din w:°��p�re°du �m mnrue° d wNreyour Downtown re rqn 6ngh <ne ronamwiminrearowyw mono coverage online, in print, radio, and TV ronrs.lw 8communl,k" n 'lltliomel� m'Yo.koso•w w^aMaR �l'0u IIasY Fro Y mil'"V /^\o Community Services T MATTER A MO\JIEs V - I�� pCCESSIBILITV COMMISSION EEF ILM INCLUSION & FRpIVERSTTY E4UITV goo BV THE EDMONpS 1 '40�,,001 n ApR c� r 2 0 G � ondslheate� Noon at Edm VIG�IGLIO OC-T 2�1' VE NO .TRACE NOV )A8: LEA MISER LAND 0 2 pp,0 ]AN ' MOONLIGHT FEg 117' KuMu HINA NIAF'AMEF.ICAIV FACTOF'V App.20 • Staff Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility Commission • Continue the Diversity Film e CAri Ac • DEIA Commission grant program - $2000 Increased community outreach and support activities such as Lunar New Year; Pride Event; Community Fair; Juneteenth a Economic Development Cl) N U O c 0 w 0 c m as L (L m a� 0 m 0 w U) a r _ d E OF EDM v V N Q Packet Pg. 258 Economic Development ARPA funding: • Account "B" shall be the "Edmonds Rescue Plan Household Support" account • On track to grant the entirety of the $920,000 allocated to household grants this year • Account "C" shall be the "Edmonds Rescue Plan Business Support" account • No funds were disbursed from this account • Account "D" shall be the "Edmonds Rescue Plan Nonprofit Organization Support" • Disbursed final $79,000 of grants • Account "E" shall be the "Edmonds Rescue Plan Job Retraining Program" • Disbursed additional $108,300 to Edmonds College • Additional ARPA distributions • $210,000 to Edmonds School District for SINC positions OF EDM v V N Q Packet Pg. 259 Economic Development .,W, ,, % t Edmonds Tourism Marketing • Consolidated a talented local team of marketing professionals • Focused on improving the branding and delivery of tourism �e- messages �� E D M O N D S Increased organic social media • Continued to build web presence and work with regional publications such as 425 and The Seattle Times w Q Packet Pg. 260 Community/Culture/Economic Develop,___'___' edamonay fatr Camunity C, &,NFo Sp f0oQ' MV5,_3:oC)pm F,ESchool 6th20231 s-W°°dwayw go e nd rnon EdoO2tIn St.Swf Ealteaf sf stevarFFtEE 602 tm1 offered 00 'Enl°Yasyen�e rnF,�dan°PP°��zHoesvnvolved twttn tne��tas omsofine rde mdwConnect E^�°y fo. listen to some on. Est r vend om Wt ne�erRidPant svitny artns.Parwn�q endo{fer tnls°P Kes, V vs.P e aye excae u� W°9romknowkd9e °��tee�s°PP°ttunf Edm ndsres�hets. volun w,�mnge ostanootn°^ 1tn �'���_ wM1ha p\ease aPbPage and ee an tutt�ell at ¢vent we . anY Quesi 7�40f me9an.lutttell@ ge15775]swa 9nv. ,� 0:.. Vol adddi d to aPP�Y details a QF code. scan the Decision Package #610-24001 Business Improvement District FISCAL DETAILS Operating Expenditures 140.000.61.558.70.31.00 SUPPLIES 140.000.61.558.70.41.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140.000.61.558.70.41.40 ADVERTISING 140.000.61.558.70.49.00 MISCELLANEOUS Total Operating Expenditures Revenues 140.000.321.99.000.00 ED! ASSESSMENT FEE Total Expenditures 2024 10,650.00 67,500.00 19,975.00 4,370.00 102,495.00 102,495.00 -110,626.00 Total Revenues-110,626.00 Net Budget-8,131.00 This decision package was developed by the BID and approved by the BID board in August 2023 l L Packet Pg. 262 Decision Package #610-24002 Lodging Tax Fund Budget - Tourism Promotion FISCAL DETAILS 2024 Operating Expenditures 120.000.31.575.42.41.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 72,400.00 120.000.31.575.42.41.40 ADVERTISING 55,000.00 120.000.31.597.73.55.17 TRANSFER TO FUND 117 4,000.00 Total Operating Expenditures 131,400.00 Total Expenditures 131,400.00 Revenues 117.100.397.73.120.00 TRANSFER FROM FUND 120-4,000.00 120.000.313.31.000.00 HOTEL/MOTEL EXCISE TAX-120,941.00 Total Revenues-124,941.00 Net Budget 6,459.00 This decision package allocates Lodging Tax funds. The LTAC approved the allocation of funds on June 15th, 2023 Packet Pg. 263 Decision Package #610-24004 Grant Specialist FISCAL DETAILS Operating Expenditures 001.000.61.557.20.11.00 SALARIES/WAGES 001.000.61.557.20.23.00 BENEFITS 001.000.61.557.20.31.00 SUPPLIES 512.000.31.518.88.35.00 SMALL EQUIPMENT Total Operating Expenditures Total Expenditures Net Budget 2024 142,450.00 32,550.00 5,000.00 3,000.00 183,000.00 183,000.00 183.000.00 This decision package requests a new position for a grant specialist. This specialist's work will focus on bringing new money in to the city, specifically from the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. This position will focus initially on preparing grants for multi -modal infrastructure and on preparing a cross -department grant -writing work plan to support the city's most strategic initiatives. Packet Pg. 264 Decision Package #610-24008 Household Support Grants FISCAL DETAILS Operating Expenditures 142.000.39.518.63.41.00 COMMUNITY RELIEF FUNDS Total Operating Expenditures Total Expenditures Revenues 142.000.333.21.019.00 CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND 2024 300,000.00 300.000.00 300,000.00 -300,000.00 Total Revenues-300,000.00 Net Budget 0.00 Household Support Grants have used the Edmonds Rescue Plan Funds to supplement Edmonds resident's income during the COVID pandemic recovery. Households who meet strict criteria are eligible for a $2,500 grant that can help pay for household expenses that they are struggling to pay. Packet Pg. 265 Cultural Services Cl) N U O c 0 w 0 _ m as L (L m a� 0 m 0 w U) a r _ d E OF EDM v V N Q Packet Pg. 266 Cultural Services - WOTS nationally known conference CU Edmonds Arts Commission a. s i edmonds writeonthesound.com Complete schedule, workshop descriptions and link to registration 0 0 • Three day Writers' Conference - M 197 people attended 2023 in - person conference, 47 attended the Online Preconference • Attendees from 11 states and Canadian provinces c 0 w r • Presenters from 13 states across the L country • Keynote by Jamie Ford, featured W presentation by Rick Steves L) t • 30+ overnight stays Q Packet Pg. 267 1 Cultural Services - Public Art Acquisition/ M Edmonds Arts Commission - Permanent Public Art a 2023 Civic Park art by Clark Wiegman completed, Hwy 99 permanent replacement banner project in o N progress, 2024 Library art project (approved by City Council in 2020) Ramlsh: Z r Edmonds L Library ��yv650 MAIN ST yam+ Front view of existing site at 650 Main St. N EDMONDS LIBRARY PROJECT CALL -TO -ARTISTS City of Edmonds, WA Request for Proposals [RFP] a m a� The City of Edmonds Arts Commission is seeking an artist or artist -led team to create a site -specific commis for the Main Street entry area outside the City owned Edmonds Sno-Isle Library building, Edmonds WA. ThE m artist for this commission will be selected through an open call process review of qualifications, with the fin W artwork decided on the basis of paid, competitive proposals. Cl) U r c d E OF EDM v v O w+ v� N Q Decision Package #610-24005 Municipal Arts Fund Budget — Increase $100,000 for Library project from ending cash, $39,535 from 332 Fund FISCAL DETAILS Operating Expenditures 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE Total Operating Expenditures Capital Expenditures 332.000.64.594.76.65.00 CONSTRUCTION -PARK FACILITIES 2024 100,000.00 100,000.00 39,535.00 Total Capital Expenditures 39,535.00 Total Expenditures 139,535.00 Net Budget 139,535.00 The proposed public art includes two projects: one on Hwy 99 for permanent metal banners in the International District, and one in the Creative District for the Library site. Both are near term implementation as one -time expenditures. Packet Pg. 269 Cultural Services - Temporary Public Art Edmonds Arts Commission - On the Fence installations, Poet's Perspective poetry, Mika's Playground performance at Civic TINYURL.COM/POETSPERSPECTIVE 1425.771.0228 Community/Culture/Economic Develd� AW 44 ^ � n.�\ *r'... _ � � 'ram `-- `�u � \ '' , �� \' •, f, ` / D AMAif Cultural Services - Tourism Promotion Awards Edmonds Arts Commission - $20,000 Lodging Tax funds allocated in 2023, $32,000 proposed 2024 Supports nonprofit arts organizations to promote events that attract tourists OF ED y� w Packet Pg. 272 � 1 179 ��c. 1 �q0 Decision Package #610-24011 Lodging Tax Fund Budget - Arts Promotion - Increase to $43,400, use ending cash FISCAL DETAILS 2024 Operating Expenditures 123.000.64.573.20.41.40 ADVERTISING Revenues 43,400.00 Total Operating Expenditures 43,400.00 Total Expenditures 43,400.00 123.000.313.31.000.00 25% HOTEL/MOTEL TOURISM TAX Total Revenues Net Budget -40,313.00 -40,313.00 3,087.00 $31,400 LTAC approved budget on June 15, 2023. Additional $12,000 for tourism promotion grants pending approval by LTAC due to higher than forecasted ending balance and increased need to attract audience as local arts organizations continue to recover from impacts of pandemic. Packet Pg. 273 Cultural Services & Economic Development Washington State Creative Economy - Industry Snapshot -The Creative Economy's contribution to the state's GDP is 10.3%. •Washington's creative sector is #1 in the nation in share of state GDP. California is a distant second at 7.5%. •The sector contributes $119.2 billion to the state's economy. •The Creative Economy employs more than 180,000 workers. Washington State Dept of Commerce - 2023 Packet Pg. 274 Cultural Services & Economic Development EDMONDS CREATIVE DISTRICT 2024-2028: 11 Recertification Application December 2023 Develop continuing work plan areas • Area A. Strengthening and expanding the creative identity of Edmonds • Area B. Leveraging and connecting creative experiences in Edmonds • Area C. Retaining and attracting creative businesses and nonprofits in Edmonds CU a C14 N 1� .. 0 W N ) � Packet Pg. 275 Neighborhoo��� Community City Hall Services Improve Engagement connection with community 11 torytelling Improve Leadership in programming MMI tate's creative Community/Culture/Economic Develop,___'___' Economic development Supporting all residents Strategic marketing Cultural Services In person WOTS Public Art Creative District recertification economy 9MI �Placemaking 11LF-- 4t" Ave project discussion Econ. Dev. Plan Cultural Plan Community, Culture and Economic Development QUESTIONS? Cl) N H U O c 0 w L (L m a� m 0 w U) a r _ d E OF EDM v � N Q Packet Pg. 277 10.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 2024 COLA for non -represented employees Staff Lead: Jessica Neill Hoyson Department: Human Resources Preparer: Jessica Neill Neill Hoyson Background/History Per City policy, the Mayor will recommend the adjustment of the salary schedule for non -represented employees to the City Council for approval as part of the budget process. Staff Recommendation Recommend the following be approved: 4% COLA for 2024 Narrative Please see attached PowerPoint which will be presented by HR at the Council meeting. Attachments: Proposed 2024 Wage Adjustment Presentation Packet Pg. 278 Proposed 20' Wage Adjust Non -Represented Employees Personnel Policies - Chapter 5 Compensation Annual Salary Adjustments Personnel Policy 5.10 NON -REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES' ANNUAL SALARY ADJUSTMENTS The Mayor will recommend the adjustment of salary schedule for non -represented employees to the City Council for approval as part of the budget process. ■ 2024 Wage Adjustments for Represented Groups Currently the AFSCME , Teamsters, and EPOA Law Support collective bargaining agreements are settled for 2024 AFSCME 4.6% Teamsters 4.6% Law Support 4% The EPOA Commissioned contract is not settled for 2024 but as this is a represented group that has binding arbitration, taking this group's wage adjustments into consideration for the non -represented employees would not be appropriate. Other Data points Using "comparator" organizations is often the standard in establishing compensation and has been used by Edmonds for both represented and non - represented employees Using the Consumer Price Index for Urban wage earners in the Seattle/Tacoma/Bellevue area is also used as data point to establish compensation levels. Comparator Organization proposed non - rep adjustments for 2024 Given that so many of Edmond's comparators have not yet established the non -rep wage adjustment for 2024 it is advised not to use the median of the comparators for 2024 Using the CP1-U to determine wage adjustment,, In order to determine the cost of inflation from one year to the next the year a period is established be setting a base month between two years. The June to June period is the most commonly used. The 2023 CPI-U, which is used to establish 2024 wages, was 4.6% Washington State Minimum Wage Increase for 20240 Washington State minimum wage will increase to $16.28 per hour in 2024 State law requires an automatic annual inflation adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) for the August to August period. What was proposed in the preliminary budget The preliminary budget includes a proposal of a 4.6% wage adjustment for non -represented employees ■ 2024 COLA Recommendation Based on the wage adjustments being provided to represented groups which range between 4.6% and 4%; and The CPI-U for 2023 June to June being 4.6% It is recommended that the non -rep employees receive a 4% wage adjustment for 2024 Recommendation Budget Impact Current proposed COLA in the 2023 budget is for a 4.6% wage adjustment. This will cost $176,832 in wages and $37,154 in benefits for 2024 The recommended wage adjustment of 4% would have the following budget impact: $175,818 in wages and $37,123 in benefits DHP!;tiC L O a J 0 Ci le N O N C O R C O W d L a c m E a as am �a 3 N O N d N O Q O L a c as E is a Packet Pg. 289 10.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 10/17/2023 Proposed 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program Staff Lead: Rob English, Oscar Antillon, Angie Feser & Shannon Burley Department: Engineering Preparer: Rob English Background/History On September 19, 2023, staff presented the proposed 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program in a joint meeting with the City Council and Planning Board. On October 10, 2023, a public hearing was held for this item. Staff Recommendation Review and discuss proposed CFP-CIP documents. Narrative The Public Works and Utilities Department proposed 2024-2029 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 1. The Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department proposed 2024-2029 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 2. The presentations for Public Works & Utilities and Parks, Recreation and Human Services are attached. (Attachments 3 & 4). The Planning Board held a public hearing on September 27, 2023 (see Attachment 5 for the draft Minutes). The Planning Board prepared a memo to the City Council after their review of the CFP-CIP documents (see Attachment 6). BACKGROUND: The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years, which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities in order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects. These preservation projects are part of the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects. Attachments: Attachment 1 - 2024 Public Works CIP.CFP DRAFT Attachment 2 - 2024 Parks CIP.CFP DRAFT Attachment 3 - Public Works Presentation Attachment 4 - Parks Presentation Packet Pg. 290 10.4 Attachment 5 - Draft Planning Board Minutes 09.27.23 Attachment 6 - Planning Board Memo COE CIP Overview Packet Pg. 291 . W CRY OF EDMONDS PUBLIC WORKS 2024-2029 PROPOSED CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM oi- pw- l f ' - -woo0-- Rl Packet Pg. 292 10.4.a TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECT MAP..............................................................ii FACILITIES & WWTP PROJECT MAP............................................................................iii TRANSPORTATION...........................................................................................................1 . PRESERVATION/MAINTENANCE PROJECTS............................................................6 SAFETY/CAPACITY ANALYSIS....................................................................................15 NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS.........................................39 as FERRYPROJECTS....................................................................................................63 TRAFFIC CALMING 65 ................................................................................................ TRAFFICPLANNING.............................................................................................. 67 GREENSTREETS......................................................................................................70 WATER........................................................................................................................... 72 STORMWATER.............................................................................................................. 77 EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION RELATED PROJECTS.....................79 PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN PROJECTS..........................................................................81 STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS...............................................85 ANNUALLY FUNDED PROJECTS..........................................................................88 COMPLIANCE RELATED PROJECTS.....................................................................91 SEWER............................................................................................................................ 93 FACILITIES.....................................................................................................................100 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.........................................................................122 CFP-CIP COMPARISON(2024-2029)....................................................................1 34 Packet Pg. 293 2024 CFPICIP Al 0 10.4. a PWT-05 VPW,I,��T-07 PWT-65 �X-.� PWT-04 ,— PWT-51 PWT-03 PWT-09 PWT-12 W�6 PWT-35 `PWT-37 PWT-48 PWT-19 PWT-16 • PWT-11 PWT-25 PWT-15 -- — PWT-20 -- PWT-08 PWT-21 • PWT-30 PWTI20 A PWT-13 PWT-14 PWT-47 P.WT W, PWT-31 PWT-06 PWT-23 PWTi64 PWT-50 PWT-06 PWS-11 '� = �� ►� PWD-06 J WP PWT-26 P ��' PWT-10 _ * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. PWT-43 •L Packet Pg. 294 2024 CFP/CIP vl.10 II DRAFT S41 , ���� 4el Zak ���� PWF-07 #WF-01 � a 99.*►�p ♦ �s, • W �► `y PWF-16 �^T '► PWF-03 0 f�lj 'i�11 : �I o yJ=y PWF-100 �PiWr�09: A IN-oall FitFor p "umf �1. o q PWF-13�� . ,, 014 If I �111111111111114 J92M. ELTi 54, �k IOU .L. - - PWF-09 M fF-03 IP • PW 3 PWF-10 14 RUB' IEPF-23 F PWF=13�� 0 * Site specific projects only. Citywide/a—nnual citywide 2024 CFP/CIP v1.10 ill' PWF-08 • �- - --FA--TWA �-A rolects no sown." Packet Pg. 295 DRAFT 10.4.a 01 E Packet Pg. Pg. 2966 TRANSPORTATION O 0 d r Preservation / Maintenance Projects PWT-01 Annual Street Preservation 81 $1,600,000 $2,400,000 $1,300,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $13,190,000 $39,450,000 $52,640,0( LL Program ca PWT-03 76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th 67 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $20,0( St. SW to Olympic View Dr. U PWT-04 Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to 68 $789,553 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $789,553 $0 $789,5! 8th Ave. c N PWT-05 Puget Dr. / OVD Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $496,000 $0 $586,000 $0 $586,0( N PWT-06 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave / $0 $0 $0 $165,000 $773,000 $0 $938,000 $0 0 $938,0( 238th St. SW PWT-07 Main St. / 3rd Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $383,000 $493,000 $0 0 $493,0( 0 L- PWT-61 Olympic View Dr Overlay - 196th / $0 $200,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 a $1,500,0( SR-524 to Talbot Rd F- PWT-68 88th Ave Overlay and Sidewalk 77 $150,000 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 LL $1,500,0( < Repair 0 Safety / Capacity Analysis LL PWT-08 X 228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th $0 $0 $0 $1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000 $17,047,000 $0 v $17,047,0( a PI. W Corridor V PWT-09 X Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway - 69 $114,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $114,000 $0 $114,0( Y Stage 2 c PWT-10 X Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 3 70 $1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $13,752,000 $0 $31,284,000 $0 $31,284,0( PWT-11 X Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 4 71 $1,290,000 $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $2,369,000 $0 $16,434,000 $25,593,000 $16,000,000 $41,593,0( a Iq N PWT-12 X Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 5 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,500,000 $43,673,000 $47,173,0( N PWT-13 X Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,160,000 $21,160,0( m E PWT-14 X Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,430,000 $40,430,0( PWT-15 X Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,242,000 .r $35,242,0( Q PWT-16 X Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,277,000 r c $21,277,0( PWT-17 X SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave. W - $0 $0 $0 $263,000 $238,000 $788,000 $1,289,000 $0 t $1,289,0( Intersection Improvements Q PWT-18 X Main St. / 9th Ave. Intersection $0 $0 $0 $198,000 $1,092,000 $0 $1,290,000 $0 $1,290,00u Improvements 2024 PW CFP/CIP Al 2 Packet Pg. 297 PWT-19 X 76th Ave. W / 220th St. SW - 72 $650,000 $774,100 Intersection Improvements PWT-20 SR-104 Adaptive System 73 $186,575 $0 PWT-21 X SR-104 /100th Ave W. Intersection $0 $0 Improvements PWT-22 X SR-104 / 95th PI. W Intersection $0 $0 Improvements PWT-23 X SR-104 / 238th St. SW $0 $0 Intersection Improvements PWT-24 X Olympic View Dr. / 76th Ave. W $0 $0 Intersection Improvements PWT-25 X 84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to $0 $0 238th St. SW) PWT-26 X SR-104 / 76th Ave. W Intersection $0 $0 Improvements PWT-27 X Olympic View Dr. / 174th St. SW $0 $0 Intersection Improvements PWT-28 175th Slope Repair $0 $0 PWT-59 2024 Traffic Signal and Safety 74 $30,290 $0 Upgrades PWT-67 Waterfront Emergency Response 83 $50,000 $0 Study Non -Motorized Transportation Projects PWT-29 X 232nd St. SW Walkway from $0 $0 100th Ave. to SR-104 PWT-30 X 236th St. SW Walkway - Madrona $0 $0 Elementary to 97th Ave. W PWT-31 X 236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. $0 $0 99 to 76th Ave. W PWT-32 X 84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th $0 $0 St. SW to 234th St. SW PWT-33 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th $0 $0 St. SW to 206th St. SW PWT-34 X 80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th $0 $0 St. SW to Olympic View Dr. PWT-35 X 218th St. SW Walkway from 76th $0 $0 Ave. W to 84th Ave. W d $50,000 $6,670,000 $0 $0 $8,144,100 $0 r $8,144,1( LL $0 $4,400,000 $0 $0 $4,586,575 $0 $4,586,5, $0 $180,000 $720,000 $1,600,000 $2,500,000 $0 Q $2,500,0( 'j rn $0 $42,000 $228,000 $0 $270,000 $0 $270,0( N $0 $227,000 $1,292,000 $0 $1,519,000 $0 $1,519,0( N $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,347,000 13 $1,347,0( c a- $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,615,000 $17,615,0( 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,424,000 $3,424,0( LL Q $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $715,000 $715,0( a LL $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $1,000,0( a U $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,290 $0 $30,2f Y $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 0 $50,0( 3: 2 a $0 $0 $284,000 $1,572,000 $1,856,000 $0 $1,856,0( N 0 N $0 $296,000 $1,692,000 $0 $1,988,000 $0 $1,988,0( r $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,937,000 .r c $1,937,0( E t $0 $160,000 $1,350,000 $0 $1,510,000 $0 $1,510,0( Q $0 $110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000 $1,582,000 $0 $1,582,0( d E $0 $482,000 $1,851,000 $0 $2,333,000 $0 $2,333,0( $0 $264,000 $1,474,000 $0 $1,738,000 $0 .r $1,738,0( Q 2024 PW CFP/CIP Al 3 1 Packet Pg. 298 Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. PWT-36 X S to 7th Ave S PWT-37 X 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W Citywide Bicycle Improvements PWT-39 X Project 78 PWT-40 X Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW 95th PI. W Walkway from 224th PWT-41 X St. SW to 220th St. SW PWT-43 X SR-104 / 76th Ave. W Non - Motorized Trans Improvements PWT-44 X Downtown Lighting Improvements PWT-45 X SR-104 Walkway - HAWK Signal to Pine / Pine from SR-104 to 9th PWT-46 X 191 st St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave. W 104th Ave. W / Robinhood Lane PWT-47 X from 238th to 106th PWT-48 X 80th Ave. W from 218th St. SW to 220th St. SW 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to PWT-49 X 186th St. SW PWT-50 X 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th Ave. W Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. PWT-55 X S to 9th Ave. S 80 PWT-60 2024 Pedestrian Safety Program 75 PWT-66 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Ferry Projects PWT-51 X Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St. to Dayton St. Traffic Calming PWT-52 Traffic Calming Program 79 V FfA d $0 $0 $0 $290,000 $0 $0 $290,000 $0 r $290,0( LL $0 $0 $0 $220,000 $0 $0 $220,000 $0 $220,0( $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 Q- $15,0( U rn $0 $0 $0 $220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000 $2,951,000 $0 $2,951,0( N $0 $0 $0 $131,000 $731,000 $0 $862,000 $0 It $862,0( N $0 $0 $0 $261,000 $1,310,000 $0 $1,571,000 $0 $1,571,0( c a- $0 $0 $0 $328,000 $1,310,000 $0 $1,638,000 $0 $1,638,0( a $0 $0 $0 $273,000 $273,000 $2,730,000 $3,276,000 $0 $3,276,0( � Q $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $719,000 $719,0( 0 a $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,124,000 LL $1,124,0( U a_ U $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $344,000 $344,0( w Y i $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $348,000 O $348,0( 3: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,363,000 $1,363,0( a $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,0( c N $80,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,770 $0 $80,71 r $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 .r c $8,000,0( t $0 $0 $0 $380,000 $0 $0 $380,000 $0 .r $380,0( Q c d E $100,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $210,000 $330,000 $540,0( ;a .r Q 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 4 1 Packet Pg. 299 10.4.a d r Traffic Planning ADA Transition Plan (Right -of- PWT-53 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 Li $440,0( Way) PWT-54 Transportation Plan Update 66 $236,085 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $236,085 $0 $236,M V Green Streets rn N Green Streets 236th St SW - 84th PWT-64 X $0 $350,000 $3,150,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $0 0 N $3,500,0( c Ave W to Highway 99 TOTAL EXPENDITURE $6,612,273 $8,666,100 $11,434,000 $37,758,000 $37,078,000 $51,122,000 $152,670,373 $246,498,000 $398,418,3� N a� 0 FUNDINGSOURCE• SUBTOTALa- , 0 (2024-2029) a_ Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- $251,570 $105,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $356,570 $0 $356,5, H modal revenue LL Q REET Fund 125 $1,224,345 $850,000 $950,000 $1,190,000 $750,000 $750,000 $5,714,345 $11,250,000 $16,964,3, REET Fund 126 $975,905 $872,000 $1,614,300 $1,212,000 $772,000 $772,000 $6,218,205 $11,580,000 a $17,798,2( U Transportation Impact Fees $423,361 $466,229 $1,033,475 $0 $0 $0 $1,923,065 $0 a $1,923,0( U General Fund $0 $335,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $335,000 $0 N $335,0( C Water Utility Fund 421 $18,000 $18,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000 $0 $36,0( u_ Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $69,000 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $294,000 $0 $294,0( a N Sewer Utility Fund 423 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $40,0( N Federal Grants $2,070,355 $744,871 $2,716,525 $0 $0 $0 $5,531,751 $0 $5,531,7! r c m State Grants $1,572,237 $2,630,000 $1,969,700 $13,000,000 $6,688,000 $0 $25,859,937 $0 $25,859,9, t Other (Sound Transit Grant) $7,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,500 $0 $7,5( w Q ARPA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 d Unsecured Funding $0 $2,380,000 $3,150,000 $22,356,000 $28,868,000 $49,600,000 $106,354,000 $223,668,000 $330,022,0( 0 TOTAL REVENUE $6,612,273 $8,666,100 $11,434,000 $37,758,000 $37,078,000 $51,122,000 $152,670,373 $246,498,000 $399,168,3, Q 2024 PW CFP/CIP Al 5 1 Packet Pg. 300 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 Packet Pg. 301 Public Works - Transportation nnual Street Preservation Program Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets. Maintains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital investment to rebuild City steets $1,600,000 (2024) Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $1,950,OOC $1,450,000 $2,250,000 $1,150,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $37,500,OOC $1,600,000 $2,400,000 $1,300,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $39,450,000 $800,000 $750,000 $650,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $11,250,OOC $800,000 $750,000 $650,000 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $11,250,OOC $900,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $16,950,OOC $1,600,000 $2,400,000 $1,300,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $39,450,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 7 1 Packet Pg. 302 184th St SW o` A z3rd-WSW I €U Qq, m 185th St SW 185th St SW 85th PI SW �y 0<1- �__11�4 W 185th PI 186th St SW ¢ � ¢' SW ;h Pl SWMp �snnais:y 9 V Q IC m r Q 1861h St SW r bth 18 St 187th St SW co n L 3 SN e,thPl sv: ko b W ¢ LlJ s 188th St SW Q 187th-P1 SW Q 188TH-ST+SWL=w., a 188th-PvsW-- -Penny Ln 0 1189th PIS 9� ✓ ¢190th St SW Q ry 189th PI- 3 S* _ 189th PI SW 189th PI SW 9t�tP v 190th=St SW"=190th=St=SW� a 191st St Sw 3 -.. 192nd St SW w Nl 91 st PI SW ) —''l n I 3 192nd -�1-91st=St-SWI I �a7e 80t S16 h 192nd PI Sw Q St SW 192nd-PI SW W t = w� 193rd '-W 3 192nd"P_I=SW _ Park W 1 a ' PI SW H 3 ^ r 193rd PI SW J Q==193rd St SW-= = -S 3 194th St SW ^ L �194th 2 193rd St SW � 195ih St SW PI SW_ _E 3 j F. w > 1941ns<sw ¢ N to St sw 1-96TH-ST=SW a 0 A pavement overlay of 76th Ave from 196th St. SW (SR-524) to Olympic View Dr was completed in 2023. The project close- out and required federal documents for the transportation grant will be completed in 2024. The east side of the street is within the City of Lynnwood and was included in the project. Improve pavement condition and upgrade pedestrian curb ramps to meet ADA standards. In addition to the existing southbound bike lane, the project may add a new northbound bike lane as outlined in the City's Transportation Comprehensive Plan. $2,583,000 Design Right of Way Construction $20,000 Expense Total $20,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- $7,500 REET Fund 125 $5,000 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Other $7,500 Funding Source Total $20,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 8 1 Packet Pg. 303 Z Q E n � S1 cm O MW ►AIiN�S�T Cence, Center Reid N W > Q DAYTON ST Pavement overlay along Main St. from 6th Ave. to 8th Ave. with pedestrian curb ramps upgrades. The project will be fundE with a federal grant and City funds for a local match. Improve pavement conditions and pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) on this segment of Main Street. Estimated Project Cost prior year expenditures $937,500 Project Cost Design $9,000 Right of Way Construction $780,553 Expense Total $789,553 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- $672 REET Fund 125 $158,001 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $630,880 State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $789,553 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 9 1 Packet Pg. 304 10.4. a Q 0 fir; S� J 2 Excelsior PI cu wood Ch a' <`G E J o rn � O PUGET DR w > a Puget WayW U >, Edmonds d Elementary 0 Puget Way — OJ -1_ _ The project will rebuild the existing traffic signal and remove the signal heads currently on span wire and install standard traffic signal poles with mast arms. Vehicle detention will also be upgraded as part of this project. This upgrade will provide safer roadway conditions since the hanging signal heads will be replaced with fixed signal heads c mast arms. The new vehicle detection will guarantee that all vehicles will be detected. $586,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $90,000 $496,000 $90,000 $496,000 $90,000 $496,000 $90,000 $496,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 10 1 Packet Pg. 305 W a a 23�t i �' 2 hP�SW E N �- o 1— 237th PI; O s O = V { 238th St SW 3 • c } C Faith au o Q� s > c s Community Q 0 • 238th St SW Church s� NN tea, ,— N f - h u Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system. The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life. $938,000 Design $165,000 Right of Way Construction $773,000 Expense Total $165,000 $773,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding $165,000 $773,000 Funding Source Total $165,000 $773,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 11 1 Packet Pg. 306 Bracketts Jc _ Landing as a South ���° �m021 4' 'A�! Railroad Station ✓awes J� Mini Park* = Post St Office I � � J� �ST O Q CliJ� .4W J� IT St Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system. The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life. $493,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Edmonds Polic ' e%&t and Municipa o` Court Veteran' Edmonds Centennial Plaz City Hall Plaza Bell : FountainSAC 2028 $383,000 $110,000 $383,000 $110,000 $383,000 $110,000 $383,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 12 1 Packet Pg. 307 Pavement overlay along Olympic View Dr, from 196th St. SW / SR-524 to Talbot Road, along with ADA curb ramp upgrades. Improve pavement condition and improve accessibility for pedestrians of all abilities. $1,500,000 Design $200,000 Right of Way Construction $1,300,000 Expense Total $200,000 $1,300,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 $100,000 $300,000 REET Fund 126 $100,000 $300,000 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $700,000 State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $200,000 $1,300,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 13 1 Packet Pg. 308 F 1,w*i,ff���t ita.*lrtil7 S: •r `.'' ,rs Litt r10 r w16 91 r r f'r"i. * r/ r • sl�. r ■. tl�'� ta■L t� rr ! T r ! 7Vft plant WE do -11 i „ .• s r 11It i~# ter ♦ 1 r -011 *' t •1 r oil a r - 4 PU ,FT DR /�\\ {e, = r W11:\.,... 185th PI SW _' 4. rr` � r ., r•tir � 11-- wl llr" , '. at .- II s 1 {jjt +�l�a.�ti•..rrw{III it �'• illy r i 1'rA��_.i7'i L f L __ r w r 71 .. �1 7 Yr you:::: ■ 1' 7 rr. *I' .. �.1..• i i t r ; r 1 r. Jr Lam_, 1 Ir �:., it 1^� 1 .• . rrJ___I �.� A, `Q - _. - R 1 r •s r , 'i . 7 -w—a+—w46 wi � y w� r � 1 4� ��4��►� rr'a' Jv LL 1 `1 V' 1 f�+J j +'[0�12 j• 1 I► r y!! 1 �w••w it : t '�+��''t r vw1.W+y�r.��.' F 44 I 1• •�a ti � i r a ■ a -e II+ * \�' rr._J 1:! L. � "1r�A�..r.wwrti. � i. .��__ r 1 -�, ■ l�.al.'.,�. ram.._= = 1 IF`I '� � a ■ a a' �w� � a ! -w_w1. a S F.+.tiJ�Nrrr�rr� . IL a a 1 �11.0EL 16 r ire .• y 1 I ~! r •� -_--' iri 11r*--iL Ii .r mew... ll_...."! ■ ■'J� This project will resurface 88th Ave and improve the existing asphalt sidewalk on the east side of 88th Ave from 196th St S\ to 185th PI SW in the Seaview neighborhood. All City utilities along this section of 88th Ave have been upgraded in recent years and the street is ready to pave. The existing curb is in poor condition and varies in height. The project will install 6" concrete vertical curbs and repave the existing asphalt sidewalk. Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and pedestrian safety. $1,500,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Sewer Utility Fund 423 State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 $150,000 $1,350,000 $150,000 $1,350,000 $65,000 $65,000 $20,000 $180,000 $40,000 $1,130, 000 $150,000 $1,350,000 14 Packet Pg. 309 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 15 Packet Pg. 310 3-.r.� Iw+r•� rf-==-� ,, �'rlli. LSPI:KAN(-t .•i L, i Sth St SW 224th St SW ■' r� ~ _ 224th St S _ _ _�224th St;SW iR + '.. ■ rN V.' iRih1�r .� ram' �'� , •� zzmnPiswIA ■ 3aFrr-1 ■ ■ j�`. �' IY��i■ �i��■Sraw�L7 r �,i la' .� �.� I.i�L■. L3 aq .� -� ��� r �� IL ac'�■.Lr 6- f,C'4 r a :nsrhPisw1� 7 11 - �Ic■ ilm & r ,�a�■ y J 7� ��i� 11-'■■ N! ,. �r�•�Q R zI A. ��: _t- -- _ Q I J �- � ■ a226th St SW,--_226th-`St SW ir) 4� 00 a' -� '` �m* I! II'j..rriJJ ��1 LQ�.s ��i♦ J;o� - I r ._..co- emiiw�r .�'rn -I .e.* w �} a1Ar1 it■11�,f n"!s� ! r SWL1I� dl$�� nnns sW . �a> Z 3 m t a 228TH ST S� n-1 4 -r m i 'a • , aI iJJ�w �� ■'r A • �_'A ffi l +d am ■ z2ansrs;. a J- F * )_ ■ i-jar. `` a ■ . 229th St- �� ` ��s �■«1 Q4. !� )2�(�■ it 7 w > vIJ ti Rao - � �■ a"R 3 > �O 1 a µ J _.♦ 1m■ �27 iF ■ r .a ! _ S• •ter-r ■ a' n �} - a-- m 230th St SW - 230th St SWI`- Ll AT +s oy?% ' �r 3 231st■StaSW a' .�a Q i ■ ■,sl■■s� r m w �r f w lilt 232nd St SW l y a J ■�■��■fit■ I ♦ I ,-1 �i . , ,:,. ",ram �• W g�1� V ILI rI A=_„P � i►* tr :�� `�■ .. Q•,za2�ri Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W to three lanes (with center two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this corridor. Community Transit will evalua the possibility of creating a new east -west bus route along 228th St. SW, if this project moves forward (connecting Edmond Transit Station to Mountlake Terrace Transit Station). Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures 1� 111 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,447,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $13,100,000 $1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000 $1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000 $1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 16 1 Packet Pg. 311 V) 0 � > > w a a o = a _ M LO H p, 3 Q� LLJ > Q = a a o A. o �P 0 0 3 &OW,DoIIM 9 220TH ST SW a LO 228TH ST SW FQ' 3 3 w w o� a - > a 00 � 212TH S1 SW w -; a Z Ln Ln w > w 3 Q w a 3 � = w > a~o Q 3 �n = w Q L _ F- 236TH ST SW {- - 244TH ST lip - 244TH ST SW N . In 2023, the project constructed landscaped center medians on Highway 99 from 244th St. SW to 212th St. SW, a HAWK signal — 600' north of 234th St. SW, and gateway signs on both ends of the corridor. Plant establishment and project close- out will continue in 2024. The conversion of the center two-way left turn lane to a landscaped raised median will improve corridor safety along this Highway of Regional Significance (HRS), with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of — 35,000 vehicles per day. The new HAWK signal will provide a signalized pedestrian crossing between the existing traffic signals at 238th St and 228th St. $9,300,000 Design Right of Way Construction $114,000 Expense Total $114,000 REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants $114,000 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $114,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 17 1 Packet Pg. 312 r� 2 iH[h 99 S[ SW 238th St SW £ A Q�� i 240th St SW Mathay Batt. 9e' 3 Park a o n v j 9tv t`wa m c £ �c .. 242nd St SW v £ v Edmonds 1.ydy tw N 205th St 2.1nth St SW N 205th St N 20501 St 243rd PI SW The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits are from 244th St SW to 238th St. SW. The project will widen the intersection of Highway 99 and 238th St SW to provide a second northbound left turn lane. Additional improvements will include ADA compliant sidewalks, a landscaped planter strip to separate sidewalk from adjacent traffic, enhanced street lighting, bike lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with potential undergrounding of overhead utility lines). Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this segment of the Hwy 99 corridor. $32,500,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,075,000 $630,000 $409,000 $215,000 $1,000,000 $1,203,000 $13,000,000 $13,752,000 $1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $13,752,000 $1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $6,688,000 $7,064,000 $1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $13,752,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 18 1 Packet Pg. 313 220th St SW 223rd St SW 224th St SW 3 D W C r 0 c 2 220th St SW 224th St SV 3 The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits are from 224th St SW to approximately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW. The project will widen the intersection of Highway 99 and 220th St. SW to provide a second left turn lane for the northbound, southbound and westbound movements. Highway 99 corridor improvements will include wider ADA compliant sidewalks, landscaped planter to separate sidewalk from adjacent traffic, enhanced street lighting, bike lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with potential to underground overhead utility lines). Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved $42,534,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees Water Utility Fund 421 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Sewer Utility Fund 423 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,075,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $484,000 $215,000 $500,000 $3,000,000 $1,885,000 $1,290,000 $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $2,369,000 $642,300 $29,025 $67,500 $1,020,975 $1,092,738 $432,500 $1,979,025 $168,237 $1,000,000 $357,700 $2,369,000 $1,290,000 $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $2,369,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 19 $16,434,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 $16,000,000 $16,434,000 $16,000,000 Q $16,434,000 $16,000,000 Packet Pg. 314 __- a a _216th St Sw 3 3 v W a' Q H �D 3 G a 214th St SW V o�N� c� 216th S - t SW - - -� 21614 Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development will be improved along the corridor. $47,173, 000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,593,000 $500,000 $3,951,000 $ 38,129, 000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $43,673,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $43,673,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $43,673,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 20 1 Packet Pg. 315 wfi-O&PIal Madrona Ln +7 A b ESPEKANCE LL — _ 2341h St SW 235th PI SW � 3 s W > 236th St SW x Q 236th St SW 3 = a> ono -- -- A 238TH ST SW 3 �i� _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, 3 3 U CO" k - 238th St Sl'. 234th St SW v a ro 236th St SW s 3 n a � 3 a' s 78 th Along Hwy 99 from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street c lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. $21,160,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $2,275,000 $1,519,000 $17,366,000 $21,160,000 $21,160,000 J' $21,160,000 j 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 21 1 Packet Pg. 316 tSNtKANCt +� �r,�L ��la! ��1L 1 �� ~. a Q' U_ r� IMF' iF a ■ ■ ■■� t >tirrf"i� , r.. !!- 228TH-ST =SW apa �• ; a „ ` 229th St -SW' a_ �t ' "� w r� N7 �� t r■ _ 229ih St SW / i eiIr.-s f��! i 3r 1 r r a m h rH SW �l/ c ■■ — — — a0 2$Oth St SW 230 h S zsotn 1�1 I r �.� �■LUL 23.1'stlStlSW� Q "> �. �; r ^y r w Q PMF � �- N �jGo Ir f ~ C4,�. _ Holly_ Ln 7 r ± + t t1 r. IWiAMPO `.r 1 111 �'� 233rd St A ir -10 i _ ■ I room .lA��■F'� ■Ilk ■ _i ,r q • a � a \ 6,a Maple Ln �■� 41+" , A 15 Y v ao ,fir �Q rtr 234th St SW 234th St SW M adrona Ln A Along Hwy 99 from 234th St. SW to 228th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. $40,430,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $4,254,000 $5,675,000 $30,501,000 $40,430,000 $40,430,000 $40,430,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 22 1 Packet Pg. 317 up JPr� ti qr 3 J1 �■ .ir 'Elm ■ � �� �- - ' 225th PI SW /. 3 • - 3 ■ �! I iisth PI SW. — �f � < 226th St SW -S 0 � i�� �°° E ■ BMW a / -LI a 81st , �• r_-- W a �'q y,� 3 - 228TH ST SW`C� 224tti Si SW 2- y L 3 M EDMONDS WQ MOUNTLAKE I V I 226TH PL 3W v - Along Hwy 99 from 228th St. SW to 224th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures Its Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $3,596,000 $2,439,000 $29,207,000 $35,242,000 $35,242,000 $35,242,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 23 1 Packet Pg. 318 J tv Z Ea 216th st sW 99 e Q t 0 c 220th St SW c T Along Hwy 99 from approximately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW to 216th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on bo sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. $21,277,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,978,000 $2,159,000 $17,140, 000 $21,277,000 $21,277,000 $21,277,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 24 1 Packet Pg. 319 196TH ST SW N� A Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. The existing LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan. Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase tf• delay along 196th St. SW. $1,289,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 $263,000 $238,000 $788,000 $263,000 $238,000 $788,000 $263,000 $238,000 $788,000 Q $263,000 $238,000 $788,000 25 1 Packet Pg. 320 Zell St W Bell St °' a Q 0 MAIN ST qF Anderson Cn Ir- Center W Field Q 2 Payton H„ a Yost Park 1 Bell : c N ; u i i Installation of a traffic signal or mini -roundabout. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015 Transportation Plan. The preliminary cost estimate for a new traffic signal is $1,290,000. A conceptual cost estimate for a mini -roundabout is $500,000. The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below thi c City's concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B. F u e Estimated. expenditures0 $1,290,000 u c Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $198,000 $1,092,000 $198,000 $1,092,000 $198,000 $1,092,000 $198,000 $1,092,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 26 1 Packet Pg. 321 219th St SW U � I N � m LO oo M Q �— a 21919 00 a t Lf 1 220TH ST SW Q 7514 ■ I ��M 4& ESPERANCE (V2st PI SW WINCO STARBUCKS 01 s Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through/ right turn lane. Add eastbound and westbound dedicated left turn lanes with a protected -permitted phase. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase. (Additional improvements include wider sidewalk, bike lanes, and various utility improvements (including potential conversion overhead utility lines to underground). ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan . Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2050 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D. Improve active transportation conditions for pedestrians and bicycle riders. $8,700,000 Design $148,000 $326,100 Right of Way $502,000 $448,000 Construction Expense Total $650,000 $774,100 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees $394,336 $398,729 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $45,000 $45,000 Water Utility Fund 421 $18,000 $18,000 Federal Grants $192,664 $312,371 State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $650,000 $774,100 $50,000 $6,670,000 $50,000 $6,670,000 $12, 500 $37,500 $6,670,000 $50,000 $6,670,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 27 1 Packet Pg. 322 � v Algonquin R 226th St SW �bth St Sty a 228th St SW Deep=Dr ` v N � Q s Q O c 2-31 St St S� O a � 5 Wachusett-Rd v E ° rs Nottingham Rd' Q 0 0 0 z )35th Pi SW o O 6 ooayl� O CC �C p5th UJ > a J > a L a 2 m '0LO t D 5 :2231s� a 232nd St SW V 3 ,s■3 r > 225thP\SW ■i' '. a v f e r 2261h St'SW CO i rn $ 1 "'0 . T.,+a y 1� 228TH ST SW_ '"" � s 1 :2 �. a. �aaa� ■ FO D ■.■.J ■��"R•+.L.1 r i 401 Q y N 1 M i• 1L11' r , . �■ W 230th St e > 231 st*SVaSw 'a F+ ~ 9 a 1 y,H -nu1. 1 ♦ I. !� QOq-J 22211d ai Se: ° Holly Ln - r �.•- m n� P I" ' a Maple Ln ♦�r- N co 234th St SW� + 234th-St S Madrona Ln a N -236th St SW 236th St SW 236th� The project will add a traffic signal adaptive system on a 1.25-mile segment of SR104 from 236th St to 226th St. The syster will monitor and synchronize the timing of five existing signalized intersections (SR104 @ 236th St, SR104 @ 232nd St, SR1( @ 95th PI, SR104 @ 100th Ave, SR104 @ 226th St) and improve traffic flows along SR104. Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor with a current Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of — 25,000 vehicles per day. Estimated Project Cost prior year expenditures $4,810,000 Design $186,575 Right of Way Construction $4,400,000 Expense Total $186,575 $4,400,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- $7,313 REET Fund 125 $25,189 $440,000 REET Fund 126 $440,000 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants $154,073 State Grants Unsecured Funding $3,520,000 Funding Source Total $186,575 $4,400,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 28 1 Packet Pg. 323 E R L QFC PCC NATURAL p MARKET a �C, C) �y Y 76 GA; a WALGREEN'S �Q, d PARKING BANK i EDMONDS WAY 9rh Ave w co O 00 O N co N CD(n 00 O 6) W O 6M N CD q ` BANK co 00 00 co co f� h f— h rnrnrnm mrnrnmrn CO } 04� N N rnrn i IVARS � o = o N BARTELL'S O C, uI Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block pedestrian crossing along 100th Ave. W, improve safety to c access the driveways within proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100th Ave. W with the potential addition of bik lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). ` c Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve active transportation safety.Estimated Project Cost a t` *Includes prior year expenditures $2,500,000 a U. V a_ Design $180,000 $195,000 V N Right of Way $525,000 C Construction $1,600,000 Expense Total $180,000 $720,000 $1,600,000 2 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- a REET Fund 125 v N O REET Fund 126 N Transportation Impact Fees General Fund 4) Stormwater Utility Fund 422 v Federal Grants State Grants Q Unsecured Funding $180,000 $720,000 $1,600,000 y Funding Source Total $180,000 $720,000 $1,600,000 s ca Q 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 29 1 Packet Pg. 324 227th p/ S PU D Sub Station 228th St SW 4P 27th St a > o a M Lam_ G _ 0' 228TH ST S W Westgate Chapel V)w Ov ZZ oQ �Lu w Da wLn w Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles. $270,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $42,000 $228,000 $42,000 $228,000 $42,000 $228,000 $42,000 $228,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 30 1 Packet Pg. 325 O Q y c z 238th St SW 238TH ST SW, FO' c 0 a' OS, _ _ !y x c Korean Presbyter L Church Install traffic signal. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015) Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. $1,519,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total r 2028, $227,000 $1,292,000 $227,000 $1,292,000 $227,000 $1,292,000 $227,000 $1,292,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 31 1 Packet Pg. 326 Seaview Park � a >I al 00' 185th PI SW 186th St SW, Post Office �• � NMoN LLi NVV64D a 3 a� o, a it 184th PI SW OLYMPIC V1EV pR Lynndale Park u Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11). The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City = concurrency standards (LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B. $1,347,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $230,000 $1,117,000 $1,347,000 $1,347,000 $1,347,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 32 1 Packet Pg. 327 U W UJ > Cn > SpWD Qy 2121NSTSW { 3 _ LU a p� > s M LO T W � N N { 220TH ST SWr= ' W > J a _ W > 3 { a a = a > a Q rn ST SW UJ CO s 00 �o228TH �02 q 228TH Sr _ a 3 > N c N 236TH ST W u i Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project w `c ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). 19 el Improve traffic flow, access and active transportation uses by installing a center two way left turn lane, sidewalks, bike IanE _ and street lighting. $17,615,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $2,245,000 i $15, 370, 000 $17,615,000 $17,615,000 ; $17,615,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 33 1 Packet Pg. 328 Seattle W 243rd PI SW Lake Baptist > Ballinger 4Q r, r- Church Q tilp� F H Os,�MONO 11, s wA Y �Nt20.51H ST - �z N 205TH ST W N 204TH PL ��� ���4TH PL a Z Z 0 0 _ 0 C� N N z 3o RD p J a Q � - e Add a second westbound left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Improve access, safety and delay at the intersection. $3,424,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $510,000 $2,914,000 $3,424,000 $3,424,000 $3,424,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 34 1 Packet Pg. 329 ";� O DALE BEgC N'QO 174th St SW 69 v ' ��Sth p�swe OR 7�3rd St SW 174th St SW St. Thomas Moore School A Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50' storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east tc provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13) Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street. $715,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $120,000 $595,000 $715,000 $715,000 $715,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 35 1 Packet Pg. 330 f aim 1 J1 ■ Ow'" 0%.&" 175th St SW Snohomish .--.—., o_..1, The project will stabilize the roadway subgrade and embankment and rebuild the damaged pavement on 175th St. SW Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankment. $1,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 N u 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 36 1 Packet Pg. 331 This program started in 2019 and will provide new signal upgrades, such as vehicle detection at intersections, new vehicle/pedestrian head equipment and other signal -related upgrades. These improvements will improve the safety of the City's transportation system. Improve reliabilityof traffic signal operation. Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures $30,290 P Design $500 Right of Way Construction $29,790 Expense Total $30,290 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 $30,290 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $30,290 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 37 1 Packet Pg. 332 The City Council added this study to the 2023-2028 CFP-CIP during the 2023 budget deliberations. This study will re-evaluat alternatives identified in the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Alternative Access Study and potential new alternatives for improving the reliability of emergency responses to the Waterfront. Both through and stopping trains can simultaneously block Main Street and Dayton Street impacting emergency response times to the Waterfront. The many amenities along the Edmonds Waterfront (including the new Waterfront/Senior Center dive park, marina, whale watching service, off leash dog park, restaurants, etc.) on the west side of the BNSF train tracks ar drawing an increasing number of visitors —meaning the potential for accidents and health emergencies is ever-increasing. The study will develop potential solutions to address this issue. Project Cost 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030-44 Planning 000 Expense Total $50,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & REET Fund 125 $50,000 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $50,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 38 1 Packet Pg. 333 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 39 1 1 Packet Pg. 334 WIVIUNUJ WAY I ■ v Q r lu a Q o, 2 O O y �S e � L' a 23l st PI s64 a' rn 233rd St SW v Q L 1 a Q 234th St SW tSNtKANU t r. ■ s > 231 st St SW IL �3 232nd 3 v Q All m 2.34th PI 32nd PI _ w u Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 c Transportation Plan. This project would improve pedestrian safety. $1,856,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $284,000 $1,572,000 $284,000 $1,572,000 $284,000 $1,572,000 $284,000 $1,572,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 40 1 Packet Pg. 335 •��~••�� iviaarona Elementary School 236th St Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W. This project ranked #4 Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan. This project would improve pedestrian safety. •:: 111 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $296,000 $1,692,000 $296,000 $1,692,000 $296,000 $1,692,000 $296,000 $1,692,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 41 1 Packet Pg. 336 hStSW e q � E > Q LLI - Q 2 0 236th St D � a � a > s 00 r` Q n ++ 00 Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. This project would improve pedestrian safety. $1,937,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $276,000 $1, 661, 000 $1,937,000 $1,937,OOC $1,937,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 42 1 Packet Pg. 337 LSPLRANU: W o Z y �: !*11v 1 - E = 16 234th St SN' 4th St 2 W i � _4 o Madrona Ln PARK EDMONDS WHIRLV s BALL 0 O - la APTS N s W��' r W I Christ �u NORTH 81h ■rr� 235th PI S%1 s Lutheran HAVE N a MANOR w i r CHRIST LUTHERAN Church 1 L CHURCH TRAILER o, a _ 236th St S1^/ - RT.E Park and Ride OFFICE �Q COURT 236th St SW� m - 23601 23603� Y L KJIH 23606 KJIH G 6 C' -�c 3aD 23607 M N SUNSET � ! q N 236119 0 P WILLOW �1 LL PARK PL Q CONDOS BROOK i '9 B1-10 D APT F W R AURORA 2370132 Q Eo44os ,. C E ] S MARKETPLACE ro CREST B G Q T 04 ` 0 A = U FAMILY PANCAKE L 06 J N 8901 m H V '7-11" •� 238TH ST SW °' rh1,u A 23800 2380423810 - SEOUL — - The walkway project proposed approximately 1,000 LF of new sidewalk on the east side of 84th Ave W with ADA compliant `c pedestrian curb ramps. This project would improve pedestrian safety. $1,510,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 ARPA Funds Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total lim $160,000 $1,350,000 $160,000 $1,350,000 $160,000 $1,350,000 $160,000 $1,350,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 43 1 Packet Pg. 338 £ a ��206ths St -SW v a -- — t �_ y 207th St m = � a < 208th_S1 5�; D208TH-ST EDMOND SW 208th PI SW ID g < a LLI > w PI SW o Q = r Y C A/ N 211thP,S`N ^ Q 210th St SW oc�e� ` v v a t o � < 5 a m � N w E a E - 212TH ST SW u Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. The improvements will improve active transportation safety (including for school kids due to proximity of several schools). $1,582,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000 $110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000 $110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000 $110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 44 1 Packet Pg. 339 v\�R c • sr4 Q \C ��� sahst.sw, `180th St s SW �a i — 05 Q 0 181st PI SW 3 c O 3 1 •'J ri D W 78 2nd St SW £ PI SW m a f a -d WaY ri ss• � n W I� �d9e M 84th S s Q 184th St SW � 2° C v = ►- a� � i a' co Cr c I�sns�. 185th PI SW 41�c I p ` 186th St SW ^ - V/Q Q� Ov t C 87tn PI sw v LYNNWOOD 3 a 187th St SW a o � t > f �a " C0 _Q 188th St SW " 187th PI SW f -187th PI SW f u 188th PI SW Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. This project would improve pedestrian safety. $2,333,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $482,000 $1,851,000 $482,000 $1,851,000 $482,000 $1,851,000 $482,000 $1,851,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 45 1 Packet Pg. 340 em a nta ry Chase Lake School Q c N 00 216th St SW3 a i a� 0 00 -Edmonds Woodway High School > Swedis ?r Edmorn W Q 2 - r11, Is � s W N d s 7 > a 9 ve W r _ `L 219th St SW F- n. 5 N 00 Edmonds kNCE Church of God 220TH ST SW F_ A Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. The improvements will improve pedestrian safety. $1,738,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $264,000 $1,474,000 $264,000 $1,474,000 $264,000 $1,474,000 $264,000 $1,474,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 46 1 Packet Pg. 341 THE MARINER y j LW 'W Wad m o II,I L7 Alder St - -AMR" �� # BECK'S000MMODORE > • ¢W Q W O 22 AMELV � f _ Walnut St lei ME a� a � L ,JREGORY E vim W P4 q > a Holly Dr L i° 5 Cedar St Install sidewalk on the south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S. This project is ranked #9 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch. $290,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $50,000 $ 240, 000 $290,000 $290,000 $290,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 47 1 Packet Pg. 342 MCDONALD'S ANT a a STEVENS COURT AEGIS VALUE O� Swedish ----- VILLA GEO Edmonds 216th St SW EDMONDS q� MEDICAL PAVILION 21605 KRUGER CLINIC EN'S TH ER 216th St SWT O .1�0 N OJT Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of 216th St. SW). This project is ranked #3 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). To provide a safe and desirable walking route. $220,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total im $33,000 $187,000 $220,000 $220,000 $220,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 48 1 Packet Pg. 343 The project will add bike lanes or sharrows on the following streets: • 100th Ave/9th Ave from 244th St to Walnut St • Walnut/Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave to 84th Ave • 228th St. from 76th Ave to 80th Ave • Bike sharrows on 80th Ave from 228th St. to 220th St. Pedestrian crossing improvements including curb ramps, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) and signing will be installed at 100th Ave & 224th St, 9th Ave & Pine St, Bowdoin Way& 96th Ave and Bowdoin Way & Pioneer Way. The project is currently in the construction phase and completion will be subject to available weather in Fall 2023. Project close-out is scheduled for 2024. This project will create new bike connections to various destination points throughout the City (such as schools, parks, Downtown, Sound Transit Station...). Sound Transit awarded the grant to fund improvements that will provide more convenient access so that more people can use Sound Transit services. $3,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction $15,000 Expense Total $15,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 $10,095 REET Fund 126 $4,905 Funding Source Total $15,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 49 1 Packet Pg. 344 - J s a a _CASP-ERS ST - M 4 6 3: ..r. - -- — ----- -200th-St-SW z 3 - a' 4r Mountain Ln z Vista PI a > a 3 Q L ¢ O � 201 st PI SW CO� Q b-P Z Carol Way 202nd St SW- � a y ha St SLLJ ierra PI a v 's -o j W = n Z 2nd PI SW Q' > = > > a - a Q Glen 8[ Q Glen St U Q a s � � St SWCO � s 203rd s D aAems 20a �' �04 10 a- _ h St SW Daley St Daley St J 10, 13 a O WZZ SPr,O-si Sprague St PIN 205th PI SW a n a as St Edmonds St E6111L"jdl sr Edmonds St m �,-206th St-SWr - o Bell St Fm�,at��lls Bell St o x207th 1207thPI SW St N a a m N - -- - - - - - MAIN ST- - - - - 208th PI SW Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids t use non -motorized transportation to walk to / from school. Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures • 111 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000 $220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000 $220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000 $220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 50 1 Packet Pg. 345 - — — 220TH W ST S - LU a NV 3 3 0 '' ■ a a m ZZ ■ m m LU IF o d t St S� S V z W W 221s v. r a v of `� ♦ 221 st P a �� M1 ♦ ` �- Q ,� CD s M a r l� V}, CO -a 7 it � �►��;�� �'� �' ♦ �'_ ; MOB,. 3' N 224th St SW ati — 224th St sw Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in the Lonf Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. This project would improve pedestrian safety. $862,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $131,000 $731,000 $131,000 $731,000 $131,000 $731,000 $131,000 $731,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 51 1 Packet Pg. 346 a Seattle : 243rd PI SW Baptist W Lake FQMo 0 Church Q Ballinger QMo /VOS tv t• AY N 205TH' SiTiil�i . N 205TH ST z Z- N 204TH PL Q 204TH PL a Z Z W 0 Q > z Q NERD p� I a W O�i02N� , -n�ao sr m Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb ramps. Improve active transportation safety along this section of the Interurban Trail and across SR-104. $1, 571, 000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $261,000 $1,310,000 $261,000 $1,310,000 $261,000 $1,310,000 $261,000 $1,310,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 52 1 Packet Pg. 347 A Installation of street lights along various streets within Downtown Edmonds. This project will add new street lighting in Downtown to improve pedestrian safety at night. $1,638,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $328,000 $1,310,000 $328,000 $1,310,000 $328,000 $1,310,000 $328,000 $1,310,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 53 1 Packet Pg. 348 Public Works - Transportation P SR-104 Walkway HAWK to Pine/Pine from SR-104 to Edmonds j Holly Dr � Cedar S { Marsh � � Howell Way I Magndia ( Spnrra S+ i N Q Homeland 01 Spruce St p Z N Spruce P O v w Hemlock Way � Hemlock St V7 Lu < V) M j Erben Dr j H Q ;, Q Seamont Ln a Laurel St v �. 0 < 2 F- L > a M Ln r = - PINE ST Pine sty ^n �. C G a }IN N Forsyth Ln < > G - - a e '- z Fir PI a ... no N 02 Fir St On Fi,. °I u �j w Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb ramps along SR-104 from the HAWK signal to Pine St and along Pine St from SR-1041 `e 9th Ave S 7 This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along 3rd Ave. S to Downtown Edmonds an = City Park. $3,276,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 u_ a 0 a LL 29 2030-44 ` $273,000 $273,000 $2,730,000 N 0 $273,000 $273,000 $2,730,000 a N O N c a� E t v Q r $273,000 $273,000 $2,730,000 a=i $273,000 $273,000 $2,730,000 s Q 54 Packet Pg. 349 Sierra Park ,d St ; O o 0 �- 00 O 1st St S1N " 4 w ■ en ■ A- '. 192nd PI No I Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. This project would improve pedestrian safety. $719,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $106,000 $613,000 $719,000 $719,000 y $719,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 55 1 Packet Pg. 350 a J T 3 r ♦ r � I � aobin Hood DrJ% J � P n Fr),, pa E Q'Ln ?:Z MO O:E �Lu w 232nd St SW Salem Edmonds Lutheran Heights Church K-12 Scriber Lake ■ , ;r High School" LU a ost.� Hickman 236th PI SW s o :2 Park a �' N 73'1ih pj SW Edmonds Faith Memorial ? 237th P Community 238tn St sw Cemetery rk.—k N i u Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in tr c Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. This project would improve pedestrian safety. Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures $1,124,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $170,000 C $954,000 $1,124,000 $1,124,000 y $1,124,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 56 1 Packet Pg. 351 218th St SW � o n_ s c 219th St SW c a s c 00 N 220TH ST SW - - Edmonds Church of God - ESPERANCE Project Description C c c Install sidewalk along 8Oth Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 22Oth ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the c Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. This project would improve pedestrian safety. $344,000 r LDesign Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $63,000 $281,000 $344,000 $344,000 y $344,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 57 1 Packet Pg. 352 ii PI SW s 4 r Ln 00 . 186th St SW m 187th St SW e Q N Seaview 188th St SW00 u Elementary K— Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Shor c Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. This project would improve pedestrian safety. $348,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $53,000 $295,000 $348,000 $348,000 y $348,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 58 1 Packet Pg. 353 f U U J 78� > >j i L — Q i CD0 +� 00 Co 00 00 N S q�1 < > a i o w { 00 > M a M f �■wf � a c _ c 0 o N 2401h St SW Mathay Ballinger u Park f 'i Project Description f C c c Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 c Transportation Plan. c c Project Benefit s c This project would improve pedestrian safety. _ c Estimated Project Cost 0 ..r year expen u $1,363,000 G Project . a u C Design $199,000 C Right of Way c Construction $1,164,000 c Expense Total $1,363,000 c Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- s REET Fund 125 C REET Fund 126 `c c Transportation Impact Fees General Fund s Stormwater Utility Fund 422 c E Federal Grants s c State Grants f Unsecured Funding $1,363,000 Funding Source Total $1,363,000 i 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 59 1 Packet Pg. 354 a �I The walkway project is ranked #6 on the short walkway list from the 2015 Transportation Plan. The project will install approximately 700 feet of new sidewalk, six pedestrian curb ramps and modify the existing stormwater system on Elm Wa) between 8th Ave. S and 9th Ave. S. This project will complete an important missing sidewalk link. The project is currently in the construction phase and completion will be subject to available weather in Fall 2023. Project close-out is scheduled for 2024. The project will improve pedestrian safety and provide a missing link of sidewalk on Elm Way between 8th Ave and 9th Ave $1,100,000 Design Right of Way Construction $10,000 Expense Total $10,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 $6,000 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $4,000 Funding Source Total $10,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 60 1 Packet Pg. 355 This program started in 2019 and will provide pedestrian safety improvements, such as RRFB's and flashing LED's around stop signs. These improvements will improve the safety of the City's transportation system. Improve safety at pedestrian crossings. Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures :1 1 r LDesign $1,000 Right of Way Construction $79,770 Expense Total $80,770 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 $80,770 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $80,770 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 61 1 Packet Pg. 356 Final design of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to include site design and construction documents for a safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concept was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", as well as preliminary design development through 2020-21. Funding for this project has not been secured at this time. The 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Project is managed by the Community Services/Economic Development Department. The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic and provide a strong visual connecti( between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor and contribute to the economic vitality in downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014 Communii Cultural Plan and in the goals and priorities for the State certified Creative District. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. $9,206,600 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 General Fund Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $500,000 $500,000 $6,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 62 1 Packet Pg. 357 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 63 ' Packet Pg. 358 Public Works - Transportation Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St to Dayton St W Dayton St Dayton St Dayton St _ - Puget Sound G Q L N > Maple a Alder St I � a In N r w " w Q -- Walnut _St Edmonds Marsh m u) Holly Dr c Howell Way N Homela.6 Dr > L C C'o 3 �o a rr c cnl dy Ol w o Hemlock Way X Erben Dr L Seamont Ln Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users. Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways. $380,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $57,000 $323,000 $380,000 $380,000 $380,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 64 1 Packet Pg. 359 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 65 Packet Pg. 360 Install traffic calming devices along selected stretches throughout the City with speeding issues (through completion of detailed evaluation). This ongoing annual program started in 2015 and is included in the City's 6-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that qualify under the City's Traffic Calming Policy. Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures $100,000 (2024) Design $11,000 Right of Way Construction $89,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $330,000 Expense Total $100,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $330,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- REET Fund 125 C c REET Fund 126 $100,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $330,000 c Transportation Impact Fees General Fund Stormwater Utility Fund 422 j Federal Grants e State Grants y Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $100,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $330,000 J 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 66 1 Packet Pg. 361 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 67 Packet Pg. 362 The 2017 Transition Plan completed an ADA evaluation and prioritization of the City's street right-of-way. This decision package will update the 2017 plan and expand the evaluation to include City Buildings and Parks facilities. The Plan will inventory physical barriers preventing accessibility and develop actions and preliminary cost estimates to address ADA non compliance. Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City right of way, as well as City buildings and parks facilities. $440,000 Design $440,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $440,000 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- $105,000 REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees General Fund $335,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Federal Grants State Grants Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $440,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 68 1 Packet Pg. 363 The Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan and is being updated in coordination with the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update. Based upon existing and projected future land use and travel patterns, the Transportation Plan describes street, pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure and services and provides assessment of existing and projected future transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportation priorities and guides the development of the six -year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital Improvement Program (CIP) an Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The plan was last updated in 2015. The Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Transportation Plan is being updated in coordination with the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update. Based upon existing and projected future land use and travel patterns, the Transportation Plan describes roadway pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure and services and provides an assessment of existing and projected future transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportation priorities and guides the development of the six -year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and introduce Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS). $406,000 Planning $236,085 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $236,085 Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- $236,085 REET Fund 125 REET Fund 126 Transportation Impact Fees Funding Source Total $236,085 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 69 Packet Pg. 364 DRAFT 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 70 Packet Pg. 365 DRAFT AMMOUL-_,�r t The City of Edmonds proposes the development of this project to demonstrate how green infrastructure can both address stormwater flows and enhance the streetscapes to benefit the Hwy 99 neighborhood and the downtown core. This project includes the following elements: • Roadway narrowing to reduce traffic speeds and to reduce impervious surface (vehicular capacity retained) • Sidewalks and planting strips added • Bioretention cells collect runoff from the road through curb cuts • Bioretention cells collect runoff directly from sidewalks • Public private partnership potential with Housing Hope and Terrace Place developments. Incorporating green streets into the urban fabric of the City of Edmonds is intended to demonstrate how trees, vegetation, engineered green stormwater solutions, physical and visual narrowing of vehicular lane widths, and shortening pedestrian crossings with curb bulbs help to slow traffic, ameliorate climate change impacts, and reinforce desired land use and transportation patterns on appropriate street rights -of -way. This project is intended to increase the livability of a diverse, growing city. $3,500,000 Design $350,000 Right of Way Construction $3,150,000 Expense Total $350,000 $3,150,000 Unsecured Funding $350,000 $3,150,000 Funding Source Total $350,000 $3,150,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 71 Packet Pg. 366 DRAFT 1O.4.a Mm O a c m WATER 1 ' 1 •) COST N d r PWW-01 2024 WL Overlay 27 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $0 $225,000 v O LL PWW-02 Phase 13 Annual Replacement Program (2023) 30 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 +a .Q co PWW-03 Phase 14 Annual Replacement Program (2024) 31 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,300,000 $0 $3,300,000 U rn N PWW-04 Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program (2025) 25 $426,000 $3,666,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,092,000 $0 O $4,092,000 N It N PWW-05 Phase 16 Annual Replacement Program (2026) $0 $547,000 $3,813,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,360,000 $0 O $4,360,000 N N rn PWW-06 Phase 17 Annual Replacement Program (2027) $0 $0 $569,000 $3,966,000 $0 $0 $4,535,000 $0 $4,535,000 Q O i PWW-07 Phase 18 Annual Replacement Program (2028) $0 $0 $0 $592,000 $4,124,000 $0 $4,716,000 $0 $4,716,000 er H LL PWW-08 Phase 19 Annual Replacement Program (2029) $0 $0 $0 $0 $616,000 $4,289,000 $4,905,000 $0 $4,905,000 0 PWW-09 Phase Annual Replacement Program (2030) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $641,000 $641,000 $102,677,000 $103,318,000 LL & Futuree Programs U a PWW-11 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades 26 $850,000 $4,500,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,200,000 $0 $9,200,000 U TOTAL EXPENDITURE $4,811,000 $8,713,000 $8,232,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $35,984,000 $102,677,000 $138,661,000 V 1 • 14 1 1 1 1 1' TOTALFUN 1 14 • � ' ' a Water Fund -421 $4,811,000 $8,713,000 $8,232,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $35,984,000 $102,677,000 $138,661,OOC N O N C N E L V r.+ Q r C d t V R r-' r Q 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 73 1 Packet Pg. 368 10.4.a E R L- aM 0 Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the project will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone tc breakage due to its material properties. Road pavement overlays will cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Waterline Replacement Projects. Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to the Annual Waterline Replaceme Projects. $225,000 Design $20,000 Right of Way Construction $205,000 Expense Total $225,000 Water Fund 421 $225,000 Funding Source Total $225,000 2024 PW CFPOP 0.10 74 Packet Pg. 369 DRAFT Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone tc breakage due to its material properties. Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. $2.1 to $4.9 million/year Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Water Fund 421 Funding Source Total $461,000 $547,000 $569,000 $592,000 $616,000 $641,000 $13,348,O1C $3,525,000 $3,666,000 $3,813,000 $3,966,000 $4,124,000 $4,289,000 $89,328,99C $3,986,000 $4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $102,677,000 $3,736,000 $4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $1O2,677,OOC $3,736,000 $4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $102,677,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 75 Packet Pg. 370 DRAFT �► 'W% 185th PI SW < Yost Park rn W >i Q 2 �db I- 186th PI SW Seaview 00 00 �0 Water Tank a I�OO/ G' y y � , This work is being done to provide structural upgrades, repair leakages, and upgrades to our two underground potable wat storage reservoirs. Preliminary findings completed in early 2023 were used to determine order of magnitude/preliminary costs and next steps for the now planned repairs and upgrades project. The Yost Reservoir report shows that it will need a major structural and seismic retrofit, plus repairs to address leakage from the reservoir. The report for the Seaview Reservoir shows similar issues as the Yost Reservoir, with a less serious leakage issue. Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of leakage, retrofit structures so that they meet current structural codes to improve their resiliency during earthquakes, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. $9,659,430 Design $850,000 $650,000 Right of Way Construction $3,850,000 $3,850,000 Expense Total $850,000 $4,500,000 $3,850,000 Water Fund 421 $850,000 $4,500,000 $3,850,000 Funding Source Total $850,000 $4,500,000 $3,850,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 76 Packet Pg. 371 DRAFT 10.4.a R tm O a_ 4) d 0 Q E m Q • is c.> R a U) 10.4.a STORMWATER N Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration Related Projects r PWD-01 X Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements 34 $90,000 $644,843 $0 $0 $0 $0 $734,843 $0 $734,E LL Perrinville Creek Basin Projects +a PWD-03 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects 41 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $600,000 $1,400,000 $2,000,C rL U PWD-04 X Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Phase 1 35 $275,000 $4,105,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,380,000 $0 $7,380,C N PWD-23 Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update 38 $594,390 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $594,390 $0 0 $594,2 Storm Drainage Improvement Projects N N PWD-06 Lake Ballinger Regional Facility Design & Construction $0 $0 $200,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,200,000 $0 $3,200,C N PWD-22 7317 Lake Ballinger Way Floodplain Purchase & 43 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $120,C p Structure Removal Annually Funded Projects a F- PWD-11 Phase 4 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2023) 42 $1,377,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,377,000 $0 $1,377,C Q PWD-12 Phase 5 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2024) 36 $324,000 $1,687,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,011,000 $0 $2,011,C 0 a PWD-13 Phase 6 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2025) $0 $337,000 $1,755,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,092,000 $0 $2,092,C U a_ PWD-14 Phase 7 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2026) $0 $0 $351,000 $1,825,000 $0 $0 $2,176,000 $0 $2,176,C U Y PWD-15 Phase 8 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2027) $0 $0 $0 $365,000 $1,898,000 $0 $2,263,000 $0 $2,263,C C PWD-16 Phase 9 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2029) $0 $0 $0 $0 $380,000 $1,974,000 $2,354,000 $0 $2,354,C .0 PWD-18 Phase 10 Annual Storm Replacement (2030) & $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $395,000 $395,000 $49,360,000 $49,755,C d Future Projects PWD-19 2024 SD Overlays 39 $315,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,000 $0 $315,C c N Compliance Related Projects ' r PWD-17 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan 37 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $350,C d TOTAL EXPENDITURE $3,545,390 $6,873,843 $5,406,000 $5,290,000 $2,378,000 $2,469,000 $25,962,233 $50,760,000 $76,722,2 • c� M SOURCEFUNDING 1 1 1. 1 1 I' 1 1 • Q (2024-2029) Stormwater Utility Fund - 422 $2,871,750 $3,683,611 $3,156,000 $3,040,000 $2,378,000 $2,469,000 $17,598,361 $50,760,000 $68,358,2 c ARPA Funds $114,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $114,000 $0 d $114,C E Secured Grants $524,450 $575,632 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,082 $0 t $1,100,C City of Lynnwood $35,190 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,190 $0 .r $35,1 Q Unsecured Grants $0 $2,614,600 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 $0 $0 $7,114,600 $0 $7,114,6uu TOTAL REVENUE $3,545,390 $6,873,843 $5,406,000 $5,290,000 $2,378,000 $29469,000 $259962,233 $50, 1 Packet Pg. 373 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 78 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 wr 79 Packet Pg. 374 DRAFT Wildlife - Refuge, Ar. Walnut Sta N Edmonds Marsh • Q�_ Howell -Way [/ Q M ` %i N a� 0 City Park - > 7y O �O' 0 W The project will be improving water quality of stormwater runoff by replacing existing catch basins along the west side of & 104 funded via a DOE grant and on the east side of SR-104 via a state funded appropriation. The catch basins will be replaced with catch basins that include water filter cartridges. Staff proposes this effort in order to provide water quality mitigation for all discharges that directly enter the marsh from these locations. Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the west portions of SR-104 located near tl marsh. The improvements will provide better habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh. $876,000 Design $90,000 Right of Way Construction $644,843 Expense Total $90,000 $644,843 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $11,250 $69,211 ARPA Funds Secured Grants $78,750 $575,632 Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $90,000 $644,843 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 80 1 Packet Pg. 375 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 Packet Pg. 376 DRAFT Reducing scouring flows to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified in a previous basin report completed ii 2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The project! funded by this program are incremental steps toward recovering this stream run as adequate fish habitat. These efforts ha) become even more critical given recent challenges around the Perrinville Creek outfall area. This program is a fund for implementing projects within the Perrinville Creek basin to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allows staff flexibility to respond to ad -hoc opportunities such as rain garden cluster projects, or ensure matching funds are available for chasing grant applications for flow reductions projects. The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, improve fish passage and decrease creek bed scour during peak flow events. $100,000/year Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $140,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $1,260,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,400,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,4OO,OOC $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,400,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 82 1 Packet Pg. 377 The purpose of this project is to improve the environmental health of the creek necessary to support fish habitat, and to restore the storm water capacity. The project consists of the modifications to three structures that currently prevent fish passage and are undersized for the flows on the creek, (1) the culvert at the BNSF track, remove and replace with a fish - friendly culvert or bridge with adequate flow capacity, (2) return flow to the creek between the diversion structure and the BNSF culvert by blocking the structure and restoring creek capacity and (3) culvert at Talbot Road, remove and replace witl- fish-friendly culvert or bridge that provides adequate fish passage and storm water flow capacity. This project will increase the resiliency of the watershed by building the structures that mimic the natural channel performance necessary for fish habitat and stormwater flow capacity. The project also includes time and effort to research and apply for supplemental/additional funding sources for construction. Due to the project complexity and number of stakeholders, the planning and design phase is estimated to be 2-years. The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and improve fish passage. $7,636,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $275,000 $1,305,000 $2,800,000 $3,000,000 $275,000 $4,105,000 $3,000,000 $161,000 $1,490,400 $750,000 $114,000 $2,614,600 $2,250,000 $275,000 $4,105,000 $3,000,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 83 1 Packet Pg. 378 City of Edmonds and Lynnwood joint project to supplement/update the Perrinville Creek 2015 basin analysis that determined possible locations for projects that would help decrease the peak storm flows during high rain events. Project will be updated to reflect projects completed and also determine if there are other locations within the basin to aid in the reduction of peak flows in the basin. Improve overall basin and stream health, by using green stormwater infrastructure methods. This will make it so that rainf is not simply collected and conveyed downstream and instead behaves as close as possible to natural conditions. This includes infiltrating rainfall runoff as close as possible to where it fell. This will also decrease stream peak flows, which will decrease stream erosion and improve the overall stream habitat for aquatic life. $649,200 Design $594,390 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $594,390 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $141,000 ARPA Funds Secured Grants $418,200 City of Lynnwood $35,190 Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $594,390 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 84 Packet Pg. 379 DRAFT 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 85 Packet Pg. 380 DRAFT Public Works - Stormwater P Lake Ballinger Regional Facility Design & Construction J1 WE O 0 10� 70 1 Ire■■MIP 79th P� M 0 IN■ Iva' men , Mathay Ballinger Park Me a a - 0 r` 242nr1 St cw W 24Oth PI SW = 241st St SW � t Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flooding & seasonal algae blooms along with other water quality impairments. The Highway 99 corridor is an area of high development, including a future City project which will require stormwater mitigation. By creating a regional facility, the City can improve the stormwater mitigation achieved by development, addressed stormwater mitigation needs for the future Highway project, and treat runoff from one of the City bigger polluti ' generating areas. The City can drastically improve Lake Ballinger water quality. The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Bal linger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) whic would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park. The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhan 1 a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park. $3,200,000 2024 2025 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $200,000 $200,000 $2,800,000 $200,000 $3,000,000 $200,000 $750,000 $2,250,000 $200,000 $3,000,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 86 1 Packet Pg. 381 The project purchases an existing single family residential property in 2023 located within the Lake Ballinger flood plain. Th City secured a $500,000 Department of Ecology grant to aid in this process. The home is the lowest property on the lake w is badly damaged from previous flooding to the point it is generally uninhabitable. The City intends to remove the home and any pollution generating surfaces from the site in 2024 as part of the initial 2023 purchase. The grant has restrictions that prevent this parcel to be used for public use. After demolition of the structures an impervious surfaces, the planned site use would be for public utility benefit only. Because the City storm drain line for SR-1 cuts through in an easement immediately adjacent to this parcel, the City plans to pursue a future project to split appropriate flows from the City storm drain system and provide water quality treatment to the maximum extent feasible. The future project would provide water quality treatment for a very heavily trafficked highway (SR-104) and would make significant improvement in water quality to Lake Ballinger and its downstream course to Lake Washington via McAleer Cre( Improve the health and water quality of Lake Ballinger by removing hard surfaces and a home that is generally uninhabitable. Project will also provide a future location to treat stormwater runoff from portions SR-104. $750,000 �IYZI Design Right of Way $10,000 Construction $110,000 Expense Total $120,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $92,500 Secured Grants $27,500 Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $120,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 87 Packet Pg. 382 DRAFT 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 88 Packet Pg. 383 DRAFT Annual storm drain replacement/maintenance projects. Projects propose to replace or rehab storm drain infrastructure in several locations throughout the City. Locations of work identified by City crews and staff via firsthand knowledge or video inspection results. Much of Edmonds stormwater infrastructure is past its useful lifespan and requires routine replacement or repair to preserve the function of the storm drain system. Failure to conduct annual maintenance projects will increase chances of storm drain system failure. Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs $1.7 to $2.4 million/year Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Stormwater Utility Fund 422 Funding Source Total $354,000 $337,000 $351,000 $365,000 $380,000 $395,000 $8,230,139 $1,347,000 $1,687,000 $1,755,000 $1,825,000 $1,898,000 $1,974,000 $41,129,861 $1,701,000 $2,024,000 $2,106,000 $2,190,000 $2,278,000 $2,369,000 $49,360,000 $1,701,000 $2,024,000 $2,106,000 $2,190,000 $2,278,000 $2,369,000 $49,360,000 $1,701,000 $2,024,000 $2,106,000 $2,190,000 $2,278,000 $2,369,000 $49,360,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 89 Packet Pg. 384 DRAFT Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Annual Storm Maintenance Projects. Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to the Annual Storm Replacement Projects. Estimated Project Cost prior year expenditures $315,000 Design $25,000 Right of Way Construction $290,000 Expense Total $315,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $315,000 ARPA Funds Secured Grants Unsecured Grants Funding Source Total $315,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 90 Packet Pg. 385 DRAFT 2024 PW CFP/CIP vl.10 Packet Pg. 386 DRAFT WOODWAv nkt rv� '. EDMONDS 4 ssswsrsw u"Woavaut cou"w r = MOUNTLAKE rtsnfu¢e TERRACE �Y ...in.�.x OdG COIIN7Y 1MN13 W ..... The City of Edmonds (City) owns and operates an extensive system of drainage pipes, ditches, and other assets to convey stormwater runoff into streams, lakes, and Puget Sound to prevent and minimize damage to private property, streets, and other infrastructure. The City is faced with the challenge of conveying this runoff safely and cost-effectively while preventir or minimizing the adverse impacts of high flows (erosion, flooding, and sediment deposition) and of stormwater pollutants on water quality and aquatic habitat. In addition, recent state and federal stormwater regulations make it technically and financially challenging to address these issues while balancing utility ratepayer costs. To proactively address these challeng and remain in compliance with the State -mandated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Phase II permit) and other increasing regulatory requirements, the City is updating its current comprehensive storm and surface water management plan. This permit has and will continue to have significant impact on the workload and operational budget of both the Engineering Division and the Storm Crews within the Public Works Department. Per the State Department of Ecology, the plan will also include the work findings from their required (stormwater Management Action Plan) SMAP process of City drainage watersheds. Project will also include recommendations for stormwater utilities rates to be adjusted at the discretion of Council. A holistic summary of the City's Stormwater system with recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance and improvements projects. $733,000 Design $350,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $350,000 Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $350,000 Funding Source Total $350,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 92 Packet Pg. 387 DRAFT i W-W Packet Pg. 388 10.4.a SEWER PWS-01 2024 SS Overlays PWS-02 Phase 10 Annual Sewer Replacement (2023) PWS-03 Phase 11 Annual Sewer Replacement (2024) PWS-04 Phase 12 Annual Sewer Replacement (2025) PWS-05 Phase 13 Annual Sewer Replacement (2026) PWS-06 Phase 14 Annual Sewer Replacement (2027) PWS-07 Phase 15 Annual Sewer Replacement (2028) PWS-08 Phase 16 Annual Sewer Replacement (2029) PWS-09 Phase 17 Annual Sewer Replacement (2030) & Future Projects PWS-10 Annual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabiliation PWS-11 Lake Ballinger Sewer PWS-13 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 4 TOTAL EXPENDITURE Sewer Fund - 423 _ 040, •`0 2 51 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $0 $60,0C 46 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 Co $10,0C LL 49 $2,005,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,005,000 $0 $2,005,0( U 47 $363,498 $2,043,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,406,498 $0 $2,406,4� N O $0 $378,000 $2,125,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,503,000 $0 $2,503,0C N It N $0 $0 $393,000 $2,210,000 $0 $0 $2,603,000 $0 $2,603,0( N $0 $0 $0 $409,000 $2,299,000 $0 $2,708,000 $0 $2,708,0C N O O_ $0 $0 $0 $0 $425,000 $2,391,000 $2,816,000 $0 $2,816,0C o a_ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $442,000 $442,000 $58,991,000 $59,433,0( 1.— LL Q $0 $542,000 $565,000 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $2,941,000 $13,228,000 $16,169,0C 0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $0 $7,000,0( om U 50 $522,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $522,000 $0 $522,0C a U $2,960,498 $2,963,000 $4,083,000 $9,206,000 $3,335,000 $3,469,000 $26,016,498 $72,219,000 $98,235,4E Y O V 7 a 20220264 2025 1 1 • 1' I AL 1 1 • N 1 1 O N $2,960,498 $2,963,000 $4,083,000 $9,206,000 $3,335,000 $3,469,000 $26,016,498 $72,219,000 $98,235,4� r .r c d E t v .r Q r c d E t v .r .r Q 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 94 Packet Pg. 389 Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects. Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects. $60,000 roject Cost i 2024 Design $2,000 Right of Way Construction $58,000 Expense Total $60,000 Sewer Fund 423 $60,000 Funding Source Total $60,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 95 Packet Pg. 390 DRAFT Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase capacity, or more prone to breakage due t its material properties. Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures • • Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Funding Source Total $378,000 $378,000 $393,000 $409,000 $425,000 $442,000 $9,203,679 $2,000,000 $2,043,000 $2,125,000 $2,210,000 $2,299,000 $2,391,000 $49,787,321 $2,378,000 $2,421,000 $2,518,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000 $58,991,000 $2,378,000 $2,421,000 $2,518,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000 $58,991,000 $2,378,000 $2,421,000 $2,518,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000 $58,991,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 96 Packet Pg. 391 DRAFT Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this trenchless method. Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures 1 111 • 1 111 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Funding Source Total $81,000 $85,000 $88,000 $92,000 $96,000 $1,996,679 $461,000 $480,000 $499,000 $519,000 $540,000 $11,231,321 $542,000 $565,000 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $13,228,000 $542,000 $565,000 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $13,228,000 $542,000 $565,000 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $13,228,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 97 Packet Pg. 392 DRAFT tbrtKANUL. ��■ e4sw Ln a- i� i.• Mi 5 �a �H011y Maple 234th`St SW— 3Q 234th St SW Q Q Madrona Ln Zw z N 236th St SW Q 236th St SW 2361h St SN' �z = 00 �t v h St SW 238TH ST SW __ 238th St sw _ a `'a i Oth St SW 240th St SW A. _Ire, 244TH ST SW 3: 3: 242nd St SWa a F c V%S WAY 0- Lake Ballinger 232nd St sw 232nd St SW �232 a, fN V) % a vO o Pf «« Ln 6' Y L 9 i9 I- a.v 235thStSW s�sw 235TH PL.SWhW 236TH ST SW �i a�i'�i w o LO y ro a o -24r 242"d LLINGER_WAY-244TH-ST SW Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the sewer pipe along Lak Ballinger will require additional flow capacity in the near future. These improvements are needed to account for populatio growth, reduce Infiltration and Inflow from the pipe and improve maintenance and emergency access for this major trunk system. Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, and decrease overall day to day maintenance cost. Improved access will help ease maintenance and access for emergencies, which will further decease any chance of potentiz sewer spills into Lake Ballinger. $7,000,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 98 Packet Pg. 393 DRAFT Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this trenchless method. Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures 111 Design $70,000 Right of Way Construction $452,000 Expense Total $522,000 Sewer Fund 423 $522,000 Funding Source Total $522,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 99 Packet Pg. 394 DRAFT I I i • ' W JAd 1• 'i 00001, r, K H I S r U K I C A L - MUSEUM 10 .�� 2024 PW CFP/CIP vl.10 - 100_. 10.4.a E m L- im 0 L a c 4) E m 0 a E �a r 1 1 • • ` ayi r PWF-02 Cemetery Building 63 $24,048 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 $0 $37,657 $0 $37,& 75 LL PWF-03 City Hall 63 $80,000 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 $0 $618,641 $0 $618,6, PWF-04 Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 $0 $14,060 $0 Q $14,01 V PWF-05 Frances Anderson Center 63 $110,000 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 $0 $422,855 $0 rn $422,8; c N PWF-06 Fire Station 16 $49,280 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $0 $215,406 $0 $215,41 c N PWF-07 Fire Station 17 $50,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 $0 $466,742 $0 $466,7, 0 PWF-08 Fire Station 20 $36,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $0 $244,069 $0 $244,01 0 PWF-09 Historic Log Cabin $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 $0 $39,876 $0 $39,8' a u- PWF-10 Historical Museum 63 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $0 $74,820 $0 $74,8: < 0 PWF-11 Library 63 $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $0 $0 $233,363 $0 $233,31 a PWF-23 Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $0 $4,900,000 $0 u_ $4,900,01 a Project U PWF-12 Meadowdale Club House $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $0 $115,681 $0 $115,& Y PWF-13 Old Public Works $132,051 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $0 $231,570 $0 0 $231,5' 3: PWF-14 Parks Maintenance Building 63 $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $0 $144,074 $0 $144,0' 0 a PWF-15 Public Safety 63 $220,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 $0 $1,021,721 $0 $1,021,7: N PWF-16 Public Works O&M 63 $285,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $0 $538,484 $0 0 $538,41 N r PWF-17 Wade James Theater $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $0 $305,563 $0 r.+ $305,51 E PWF-18 Yost Pool House $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $0 $114,053 $0 $114,0 PWF-19 Fire Life Safety Communications $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,000 $0 .r $125,01 Q r TOTAL EXPENDITURE $1,552,240 $1,068,824 $679,685 $1,158,886 $5,404,000 $0 $9,863,635 $0 $9,863,6: t .r .r Q 2024 PW CFP/CIP Al 101 1 Packet Pg. 396 TOTAL REVENUE d r Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $585,000 $452,796 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,037,796 $0 $1,037,75 LL Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $0 $591,028 $276,729 $76,592 $31,500 $0 $975,849 $0 $975,8, General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 m Water Utility Fund 421 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,0( c N Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,01 N 0 N Sewer Utility Fund 423 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,01 D Unsecured Funding $862,240 $25,000 $402,956 $1,082,294 $5,372,500 $0 $7,744,990 $0 $7,744,95 a 0 $1,552,240 $1,068,824 $679,685 $1,158,886 $5,404,000 $0 $9,863,635 $0 $9,863,6: Pm. 2024 PW CFP/CIP Al 102 1 Packet Pg. 397 This small structure houses the Edmonds Cemetery funerary services and the cemetery Sextant office. The building is in relatively good condition and has little deferred maintenance backlog. Minor security and communications updates will be needed as technology dictates. Projects: Minor repair and maintenance Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well -maintained facility creates a safe work environmei that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $24,048 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $24,048 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 Expense Total $24,048 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $20,000 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $8,414 Unsecured Funding $4,048 $3,377 $818 $1,000 Funding Source Total $24,048 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 103 Packet Pg. 398 DRAFT 1 ,r,11tilU f1�; (MIY SI'L l City Hall was built in 1979 and was operated as a private business office center until the City purchased and renovated the building in the 199Os. The City has operated Edmonds City Hall from this location since the renovations were completed. Th building is in near original condition and needs substantial repair and maintenance. Projects: All Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing systems need replacement, Restroom remodels w/gender neutral consideration, Center Stairway Code updates and replacement, Lobby remodel, Entry Awning re -glazing, Interior Painting, ADA accessibility improvements. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well -maintained facility creates a safe work environmei that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $80,000 (2024) Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $80,000 $279,064 $80,000 $279,064 $80,000 $129,064 $150,000 $80,000 $279,064 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 $70,949 $108,628 $80,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 104 Packet Pg. 399 DRAFT The Pier was recently renovated and is generally in good condition. The Beach Ranger Office is a 1200 square foot office an restroom facility located near the east end of the pier. There are season programs and visitor support functions that operas out of this facility. Projects: Electrical panel clean up and safety inspection, minor repairs, and maintenance, Beach Ranger Station/restroom roof replacement. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $2,971 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 Expense Total $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $2,918 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $2,971 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 Funding Source Total $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 105 1 Packet Pg. 400 The Frances Anderson Center serves as the City's main recreation center offering arts, athletic and cultural programing yea round. Due to the age and high usage of the building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or restoration. Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilers with Electric alternatives that will add ventilation, cooling and heating Investment grade audit approved by City Council, Replacement of all exterior doors scheduled for 2024, ADA accessible door closures, Plumbing drainage collector, Restroom remodels (w/ gender neutral consideration), Replacement of all plumbing fixtures, Addition of building security card readers, Building HVAC controls to maximize efficiency, Fire Sprinkler replacement, and clean building act compliance efforts will be addresses by IGA.) Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $110,000 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $110,000 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 Expense Total $110,000 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $110,000 $98,892 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 Funding Source Total $110,000 $98,892 $20,934 $113,029 $80,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 106 1 Packet Pg. 401 This facility is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue and was built in 2003 and has a building area of 10,70( square feet. The building is in fair condition and will require some infrastructure updates or replacements to remain operationally ready for the needs of the City. Projects: Roll -up Bay door controller replacements, HVAC unit assessment, Gutter replacement, interior coatings updates Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $49,280 (2024) Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $49,280 $69,388 $49,280 $69,388 $69,388 $49,280 $49,280 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 107 1 Packet Pg. 402 MIM,M MML-M: MMM MMM F��_ ML & . qm"a This building is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue, was built in 1999 and has a building area of 9,800 square feet. This building has had some updates but will need some infrastructure upgrades to remain operationally ready Projects: Bay Door assessment, Electrical infrastructure updates, roof soffit enclosure, interior painting. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $50,000 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $50,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 Expense Total $50,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $221,922 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $50,000 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 Funding Source Total $50,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 108 1 Packet Pg. 403 This building is the eldest of the City's three fire stations and is operated by South County Fire and Rescue. This station sery Esperance and supports the other two fire stations in Edmonds. The building is 6400 square feet and was built in 1990. Th( building has had significant updates to the exterior envelope and is in need of interior and HVAC system updates. Projects: interior painting, restroom fixture replacement Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $36,274 (2024) Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $36,274 $94,248 $36,274 $94,248 $94,248 $36,274 $36,274 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 109 1 Packet Pg. 404 MF�0.4.a �: 4- .y �' This Historic log cabin is home to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce visitor center, the structure was a purpose built cabi from the turn of the century. The structure is professionally maintained on a three year cycle by a log cabin specialist and requires only minor maintenance and upkeep annually. Projects: new thick cut shingle replacement, chinking of exterior log finish, interior lighting. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $30,000 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 Expense Total $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $30,000 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 110 1 Packet Pg. 405 The 110-year-old original Carnegie Library building is home to the Edmonds Museum. The building is on the State of Washington Historic registry and has been well maintained over the last several years. Buildings of this age require specialized maintenance and coordination with the state historic architect to maintain the historic status. Structural stabilization and weatherproofing are the most significant priorities to maintain this facility. Projects: minor structural reinforcement, entry fagade masonry repair, lower entry restoration Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $45,000 (2024) Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 Packet Pg. 406 - Facilit Public Works Library The Edmonds Library is operated by the Sno-Isle Library system with exception of the Second floor Plaza room rental space The library is a 19,000 square foot building built in 1982. The building hosts special event rentals and daily Library programming and community services. This is one of the City's most heavily used buildings by the public and has significant deferred maintenance needs, including the building fagade and plaza deck waterproofing. Projects: window replacement, ADA access device upgrades or replacement, gender inclusive public restroom creation, Pla Room restroom/changing facilities, Plaza Room A/V installation, building masonry restoration or building cladding, exterior stairway restoration, HVAC ventilation fan assessment, building breezeway remodel, flood damage restoration, and plaza level green roof now on CIP. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $100,000 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 Expense Total $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $100,000 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 112 1 Packet Pg. 407 MMM This 4000 square foot facility was built in 1965 as a community theater facility and later was transformed into the Meadowdale community club house. The building is currently owned and maintained by the City of Edmonds and houses tl City operated Meadowdale pre-school and the 1500 square foot Meadowdale club house rental facility. This facility while dated has been well maintained and only requires minor maintenance and repairs. Projects: minor maintenance and repairs, interior flooring and painting, and bath fixture replacement. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $97,091 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 Expense Total $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 Unsecured Funding $97,091 Funding Source Total $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 113 1 Packet Pg. 408 This facility was built in 1965 to house the City's Public Works Department, the building was converted in 1995 to tenant space and City storage, as well as Edmonds Police large evidence storage. This is a vital piece of property adjacent to the Waste Water Treatment Plant, and could be converted for utility use if regulatory requirements dictate. Building is primaril used as storage and will need some updates to maintain current operational readiness. Projects: HVAC updates, roll -up door replacement, security camera system. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $132,051 (2024) Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $132,051 $25,000 $132,051 $25,000 $132,051 $25,000 $132,051 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 114 1 Packet Pg. 409 This facility was built in 1967 by Ed Huntley who at the time was the City Facilities supervisor. The 4800 square foot facility now houses all City Facility Operations staff(11) and all of Park and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+ seasonal help) This Facility is home to the City Carpentry Shop, Key Shop, City Flower program, Parks engine repair shop and Parks and Facilitie maintenance supply storage as well as Parks and Facilities Manager offices. This Facility is near end of life and is undersized to support the departmental staffing that are assigned to this facility. Projects: maintenance and repair to maintain operational capacity, ADA restroom updates, shop floor replacement, Pine St facility exit, exterior painting. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $40,320 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 Expense Total $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $25,000 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $9,349 Unsecured Funding $15,320 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 Funding Source Total $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 115 1 Packet Pg. 410 The Public Safety building houses Edmonds Police Department, Edmonds Municipal Court and the City Council Chambers. The building was built in 1999 encompassing 30,000 square feet of office, court and municipal government uses. The buildi houses one of the City emergency operations centers, large police training, simulator facilities and evidence processing anc storage. The building has had minimal system updates over it's life and has a significant amount of deferred maintenance and should be retrofitted with new fire sprinklers. Projects: air handler and outdoor ventilation unit replacements, new solar plant installation, parking lot reconfiguration to meet current usage, fire sprinkler installation, interior hallway renovation and painting, sleeping room remodel and gender specific/neutral accommodations, gender inclusive public restrooms, operable windows is specific locations, courts flat roo replacement. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $220,000 (2024) Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $220,000 $55,169 $151,481 $220,000 $55,169 $151,481 $140,000 $55,169 $151,481 $80,000 $220,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 $515,071 $80,000 $515,071 $80,000 $515,071 $80,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 116 1 Packet Pg. 411 E a� =- = o E rt+ .Q This building built in 1995 houses four Public Works divisions and the auxiliary City Emergency Operations Center. This building is 28,000 square feet and is capable of operations 24/7 during weather emergencies and natural disasters. The building has significant deferred maintenance needs and infrastructure updates. Projects: vehicle yard leveling, HVAC unit replacements, roof system for material bunkers, ventilation fan replacements, firs alarm system replacement, lobby remodel, restroom remodel with gender inclusivity considerations, electric vehicle charging and maintenance infrastructure, emergency communications updates, interior hallway flooring thresholds, utility bay HVAC replacement, water main replacement (building connection). Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $285,000 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $285,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 Expense Total $285,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $35,000 Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $80,315 General Fund Water Fund 421 $35,000 Stormwater Fund 422 $35,000 Sewer Fund 423 $35,000 Unsecured Funding $145,000 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 Funding Source Total 2024 PW CA A10 $285,000 $80,315 117 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 Packet Pg. 412 10.4. a This community theater was built by the Driftwood Players theater group in 1967 and was deeded to City ownership at a later date. The facility is 6,300 square feet in size and houses the Driftwood Players theatrical performances and City meetings. The City's maintenance responsibilities are limited to large infrastructure, parking lot, roofing, and grounds. Projects: parking lot repair and recoating, minor repair, and maintenance. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer C that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance i reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. $99,077 (2024) Construction\Professional Services $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 Expense Total $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $43,880 Unsecured Funding $99,077 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 Funding Source Total $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 118 1 Packet Pg. 413 This recreational facility houses the City's aquatic programing and some Parks and Recreation programs. Built in 1971 the pool house historically was only operated seasonally. The tenant run aquatic programing is currently expanding to year round lap and team aquatic activities and will continue to support summer open swim programing. The facility requires minimal maintenance to remain operational and is subject to tenant lease terms of use. Projects: security updates, roof replacement, gutter replacement, plumbing fixture updates, exterior door replacements, operational repair and maintenance to accommodate 365 operations. Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected lifespan. roject Cost 2024 2025 2028 Construction\Professional Services $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 Expense Total $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $8,409 Unsecured Funding $26,128 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 Funding Source Total $26,128 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 119 1 Packet Pg. 414 All fire and life safety systems are required to be monitored 24/7 in case of emergency. Previously this monitoring has beer done by traditional phone lines (POTS). This infrastructure is aging in place and is not required to be maintained by the telecommunications providers as of 2020. In 2022 we have had 3 catastrophic communications failures that resulted sever; thousand dollars expense and lack of compliance with fire code. The City has eleven facilities with life safety monitoring, ar six locations with elevators, making a total of 17 locations with monitoring requirements that will need to be updated. Maintaining and updating aging infrastructure allows the City to continue to operate older buildings by staying compliant with fire code and L&I regulations. $125,000 Construction\Professional Services $125,000 Expense Total $125,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) Unsecured Funding $125,000 Funding Source Total $125,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 120 1 Packet Pg. 415 The Library Plaza Deck is essentially a green roof on the second floor of the Edmonds Sno-Isle Library. The deck surface was waterproofed and remodeled in 2003, since that project continuous water intrusion has occurred through the waterproof membrane. This water intrusion has been successfully mitigated over the years and has not been deemed a project of significance previously. In 2018 Western Specialty Contractors inspected the water intrusion and offered an initial ROM price to demolish and waterproof the existing plaza deck. Rebuilding the plaza deck and replacement of landscape, planter! grass, pavement, flashing and hand railings would be a separate construction project. The Parks Director in 2018 offered ar estimate to replace landscaping and irrigations systems. In 2021 a draft structural report was performed by MLA Engineerir to discover any structural consequences from the years of water intrusion, building was deemed structurally sound and water intrusion not factoring in to building structural stability. Maintaining building in operational and safe condition, in order to maintain partnership with Sno-Isle Library system. Preservation of the City's physical assets in appropriate condition vs. the age of the facility and historic capital investment. $4,900,000 Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total $4,900,000 $4,900,000 $4,900,000 $4,900,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 121 Packet Pg. 416 DRAFT Q � - _ Packet Pg. 417 10.4.a WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (2024-2029) Cos N d PWP-01 WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In House $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $5,000,000 $18,750,000 $23,750,00 Projects v PWP-02 Carbon Recovery Project 56 $500,000 $500,000 O $500,00 LL PWP-04 Nutrient Removal Project 59 $350,000 $750,000 $750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $41,850,000 $41,850,00 'Q PWP-08 Gasification Bypass (Class A Solids Production) 55 $300,000 $300,000 O $300,00 rn PWP-09 WWTP Asset Criticality Ranking and Condition 57 $150,000 $150,000 N $150,00 N Assessment It PWP-10 VFD Upgrades 58 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $750,000 $750,00 N PWP-11 Primary Clarifier 2 Rehab 54 $600,000 $600,000 $600,00 N O PWP-12 Primary Clarifier 3 Rehab $950,000 $950,000 $950,00 Q- O L_ PWP-13 ODS (Primary Sludge) Pump Replacement $350,000 $250,000 $600,000 a $600,00 H PWP-14 Chlorine Contact Channel Sluice Gates $375,000 $375,000 $375,00 Q Replacement TOTAL EXPENDITURE $2,650,000 $2,450,000 $1,850,000 $21,250,000 $21,625,000 $1,250,000 $519075,000 $189750,000 $69,825,00 0 IL U. t) a_ U N Y Lo SOURCEFUNDING 1 1 1 1 1 1• 1 1 1 1 • Edmonds (Sewer Fund 423) - 50.79% $1,345,935 $1,244,355 $939,615 $10,792,875 $10,983,338 $634,875 $25,940,993 $9,523,125 $35,464,11 .2 Mountlake Terrace - 23.17% $614,005 $567,665 $428,645 $4,923,625 $5,010,513 $289,625 $11,834,078 $4,344,375 $16,178,45 d Olympic View Water Sewer District - 16.55% $438,575 $405,475 $306,175 $3,516,875 $3,578,937 $206,875 $8,452,912 $3,103,125 $11,556,03 c N City of Shoreline - 9.49% $251,485 $232,505 $175,565 $2,016,625 $2,052,212 $118,625 $4,847,017 $1,779,375 $6,626,39 TOTAL REVENUE $2,650,000 $29450,000 $19850,000 $219250,000 $219625,000 $1,2509000 $519075,000 $189750,000 r $69,825900 N E t c� Iv .r Q r c d t v R .r Q 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 123 1 Packet Pg. 418 The WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In -House Projects is intended to maintain infrastructure and equipment to ensure that the treatment plant is well maintained. This project ensures that critical infrastructure is maintained and equipment is replaced in order to reduce risk to the City Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures 11 111 1 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $250,000 $250,000 $3,750,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $15,000,OOC $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $18,750,000 $253,950 $253,950 $253,950 $507,900 $634,875 $634,875 $9,523,125 $115,850 $115,850 $115,850 $231,700 $289,625 $289,625 $4,344,375 $82,750 $82,750 $82,750 $165,500 $206,875 $206,875 $3,103,125 $47,450 $47,450 $47,450 $94,900 $118,625 $118,625 $1,779,375 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $18,750,000 2024 PW CFPICIP v1.10 124 Packet Pg. 419 DRAFT To cover any carryover or close-out costs associated with the Carbon Recovery Project that occur in FY 2024. To complete and close out all items associated with the Carbon Recovery Project. $500,000 Design Right of Way Construction $500,000 Expense Total $500,000 Sewer Fund 423 $253,950 Mountlake Terrace $115,850 Olympic View Water Sewer District $82,750 City of Shoreline $47,450 Funding Source Total $500,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 125 Packet Pg. 420 DRAFT 10.4.a The WA Dept of Ecology has imposed the Puget Sound Nutrient General Permit upon us. It is anticipated that our current process will not be able to meet these new permit requirements. This decision package will allow us to team with an engineering firm to study our current process and design a solution that will allow our plant to meet the new PSNGP requirements as well as accommodate projected service area growth over the next decade. To meet new permit requirements and increase capacity for projected 20-year service area expansion. Estimated Project Cost *Includes prior year expenditures � 1 111 Project Cos Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total $350,000 $750,000 $750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $350,000 $750,000 $750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $177,765 $380,925 $380,925 $10,158,000 $10,158,000 $81,095 $173,775 $173,775 $4,634,000 $4,634,000 $57,925 $124,125 $124,125 $3,310,000 $3,310,000 $33,215 $71,175 $71,175 $1,898,000 $1,898,000 $350,000 $750,000 $750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 126 Packet Pg. 421 DRAFT This allows the ability to continue production of class A solids if/when the gasification system is shut down for repairs or preventative maintenance. The ability to produce and haul class A solids will eliminate a temporary but substantial cost increase hauling as this product is essentially the same in volume as biochar or concentrated minerals and is accepted at th local transfer station whereas if this option is not available, sludge will need to be loaded into trailers and hauled to Oregor as was done during the Carbon Recovery Project at a cost of up to $200,000 per month. This redundant solids processing mode was an option to add to the Carbon Recovery Project and was rejected by previous administration. Along with the savings in hauling costs, there will be no additional odor issues or daily sludge truck traffic in the adjacent neighborhood. Allow solids handling system redundancy and the ability to run the dryer unit independently in the event of a gasification system failure or repair. The dryer is capable of producing Class A biosolids, which would negate the need for temporary hauling and disposal of wet cake at a rate of up to $200,000/month. $300,000 Design $50,000 Right of Way Construction $250,000 Expense Total $300,000 Sewer Fund 423 $152,370 Mountlake Terrace $69,510 Olympic View Water Sewer District $49,650 City of Shoreline $28,470 Funding Source Total $300,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 127 Packet Pg. 422 DRAFT Work with engineering firm to develop a comprehensive asset management system which includes an asset condition assessment as well as asset criticality ranking. This will allow the WWTP to develop a 5 and 10 year asset repair and replacement and CIP schedule which will improve overall plant reliability. Develop a short and long term plan to improve plant reliability by ranking critical assets and creating a capital improvemen plan. As the majority of this facility is coming to the end of its useful life, the planned replacement/repair of failing equipment and structures will be much more cost effective than replacing upon failure and ensure that the plant maintains its ability to meet discharge permit requirements. This will also be valuable in future rate studies. $150,000 Design $150,000 Right of Way Construction Expense Total $150,000 Sewer Fund 423 $76,185 Mountlake Terrace $34,755 Olympic View Water Sewer District $24,825 City of Shoreline $14,235 Funding Source Total $150,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 128 Packet Pg. 423 DRAFT The WWTP has several VFD's (variable frequency drives) on various critical equipment influent pumps, effluent pumps, RAS/WAS pumps, aeration blowers, etc. These VFD's have an expected useful life of 15-20 years. Several of the VFD's here at the plant range in age between 20-30 years old. There have already bees some failures and replacements made. These outdated VFD's need to be replaced to avoid a catastrophic failure event that could happen to these weakened state VFD's for any number of reasons, including abrupt starting and stopping due to power bumps/loss, switching from grid to generator power supply or just a parts failure. If multiple critical components fail simultaneously, then the plant may lose it ability to treat wastewater that meets NPDES permit requirements resulting in pollution of our receiving waters and possib fines by our governing agency. To keep critical equipment reliable and in working condition. $250,000 Design $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Right of Way Construction $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 Expense Total $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Sewer Fund 423 $126,975 $126,975 $126,975 Mountlake Terrace $57,925 $57,925 $57,925 Olympic View Water Sewer District $41,375 $41,375 $41,375 City of Shoreline $23,725 $23,725 $23,725 Funding Source Total $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 129 Packet Pg. 424 DRAFT Primary Clarifier #2 cage, center column, feedwell, corner sweeps, weir, counterweight, skimming device and rake arms ne replacement due to severe corrosion. The steel has not been replaced since the original construction. The limited access wi require that pieces be assembled inside the tank. The concrete structure also needs to be inspected and repaired as neede as corrosion of the concrete in spots has led to exposed rebar and may have compromised the structural integrity of the clarifier. Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is in a state of imminent failure. Ensure WWTP's ability to treat wastewate up to its rated capacity and meet discharge permit requirements. $600,000 Design $100,000 Right of Way Construction $500,000 Expense Total $600,000 Sewer Fund 423 $304,740 Mountlake Terrace $139,020 Olympic View Water Sewer District $99,300 City of Shoreline $56,940 Funding Source Total $600,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 130 Packet Pg. 425 DRAFT r-- Primary Clarifier #3 (dual drive) cages, center columns, feedwells, corner sweeps, weirs, counterweights, skimming devices and rake arms need replacement due to severe corrosion. The steel is in a highly corrosive environment and has not been replaced since the original construction approximately 30 years ago. The limited access will require that pieces be assembl( inside the tank. The concrete structure also needs to be inspected and repaired as needed as corrosion of the concrete in spots has led to exposed rebar and may have compromised the structural integrity of the clarifier. Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is approaching a state of imminent failure. Ensure WWTP's ability to treat wastewater up to its rated capacity and meet discharge permit requirements. $950,000 Design $150,000 Right of Way Construction $800,000 Expense Total $950,000 Sewer Fund 423 $482,505 Mountlake Terrace $220,115 Olympic View Water Sewer District $157,225 City of Shoreline $90,155 Funding Source Total $950,000 2024 PW CFP/CIP 0.10 131 Packet Pg. 426 DRAFT The ODS pumps are over 30 years old and are at the end of their useful life. The maintenance, reliability and efficiency of t primary sludge pumping system would be greatly improved by replacing the current diaphragm pumps with progressive cavity pumps. During this pump replacement, piping modifications would also be done to allow pumps to support more th one clarifier, improving system redundancy along with reliability. Improve reliability, redundancy and efficiency of the primary sludge and scum pumps by replacing 30+ year old pumps and improving piping system. $600,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total $100, 000 $250,000 $250,000 $350,000 $250,000 $177,765 $126,975 $81,095 $57,925 $57,925 $41,375 $33,215 $23,725 $350,000 $250,000 2024 PW CFPICIP 0.10 132 Packet Pg. 427 DRAFT Replace two gate valves and actuators at the inlets of the two chlorine contact channels. These gates have repeatedly failed. Repair is often expensive and time consuming, as access is an issue, so it is necessary to rent scaffolding and other equipment to make repairs. When a gate fails, it effectively cuts the disinfection capacity of the plant in half. These are critical pieces of equipment and need to be replaced with a different technology to improve performance and reliability. To replace problematic, yet critical valves with more reliable technology that helps to ensure disinfection system functionality and the ability to continue to meet NPDES discharge permit requirements. $375,000 Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Sewer Fund 423 Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total $75,000 $300,000 $375,000 $190,463 $86,888 $62,062 $35,587 $375,000 2024 PW CFPICIP A10 133 Packet Pg. 428 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 134 10.4. a ON ii 9 LL W Co W 0 Q. ui � c m E E O U U U U U U U U U N @ (U N U U Q N O_ 0Z C1 0Z 0_ 0Z O_ L Q) Q) N O C C C C C C C C — Cn LO N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q C C C C C C C C Q) a) N � E O E Cn E E E E E E E E QQ Q 0 Q)U (U U Q U N Co C E0 C O C O C O U) -O Q Q)L L L L L L L .� .� .M cl)L Q) O 0 W L N CU N N N If O ItL� O O QQ) C Q C6 >N i >N O _ L O — E Q)O a)O O N fll N O O C C C Q) MO Q) Q)- L L L O L L Q L L (n L O L (n L L L L L L L L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .N (n N O O O N OU 0 O O O Cn OU 0 O O O O O O O U U U U U U U C)U U U U U U U Q) L N L N L CU N L N L N L Q) L CD N L N L N L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L R Z� C Z") R R C m m Q) E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w c m o E c CD m CD Cn Cn m E Co CD_ It N O_ O O L CD N CO O Q) (n -0 C) C Q C 0 U m E m E N Q C) ML N (6 C a- (n T Q) U d 0 > C N > a--. O E CU O Cn C)U -0 (nU' 0 Q � > O o m Q L'^E 00 O O E E " O moo/ LL O Q) O_ (n ON L O O a— O U m E / DL ///O/� VJ N C6 O_ L L VJ c� >,N L Q E O N L C) C12 Co MN L � (n� U U C ' vJ C) Q) O O D c w m U) vJ mvJ / M E M E T L U O N CDC CD Q N C m U C�6 N Q N U CDC _U d d Q CD CD N N Q O - L U_ C o N N M U N U Cp N U (n m z;-- Cn Cn Q N a_ U o m Q O C .L d U d 0 F- d U C C C O O O m a� a) a) a) wwdwdwd • Q Q Q Q) C C C 'E ^ /'1 'E /'1 ^ /) V J L L L F— F— F— N 0 N 0 CN 0 N Cl) m CO O O O N N N a) CU N fB (0 C C C N N a) a2 t t 0-a a _0 _070_0 EEa)E ��0 0 U 0 U 0 — 0 U Q E Q E E E E 0 o U ° U U U U E (0 E N 0 U O 2 O T -O O T C6 N (0 O � > E O L a O L O > O �/C�) a)O C Q L m J 0 E • L ++ O N CO L O fll • C� L-0 CO C (') N CDC`') O d U C Q CO CD N NN m N N_ CD N O U N L C C C C 0 0 o O O L L O L L L CU L CU E LO _ O C1 U O 0? U O C1 U O Q U L Co C C C C >> Cn (6 L (0 L (6 L (0 L 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 135 1 Packet Pg. 430 10.4.a > > > E E E 0 0 0 • N N N O O O ' N N N N N N ON N N C C C 0-0 _0 C C C co m co U U U O O O 0 0 0 0) 0) _� co cu m Q 0 0Q Q Q 0 0 X 25 JID O O O U U cn cn U U U Q M 0 Co O .0 N C 0"a_ -0O 0 m C a)Q U (O }' — C 0 L 0 yr L Q L 0 n U N ULL L � E > //(mo�o ,,^^ U) Nc L O w V Y L 0 C • CO ) E ' O (0 ' �/� U 0 O LL I..L > • 0 A- Y U Q U 0") 0 Cl 0 � d U d U L^ L^ N N T U) U) m m m U- U- LK ,-a ril 10 mwmm00r`[I-w00w 1- 0')rn0')000r CY)000n N N N N N N N N N N I N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 000 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N f-� M M I-� ti 4 4 r-� ti r�- 66 OO 00 I,� r,� rl� rl� rl� N N N N N N N N N N CO CO N N N N N N N N 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O N O N O N O O — O — O +J O O O O O O O O O O O O O I.- � O O O f� I� 00 c0 � 00 00 C` co Cn I-- � ti co M 00 00 00 ti 00 O O 00 I- 00 N N N N N N N N N N N N N�'It N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C)O N N N N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N N N i N i N i O O O CO N N co Cfl M M CO Cfl Cfl O M fl- ti CD CO CO Cfl CO Cfl Cfl Cfl N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ti r— ti O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E O L O L O L L O O L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 ... 0 N O N O N O "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 70 "0 -0-0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -O -O w -O -O w -O -O N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E E O O O O O O O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O E E E E E E E E E E E E N E E E E E E E E E E -0 -0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O U > U > U > Mn > U > Mn > Mn > > D > D > D > _D > Cfl NO N��( > > > > In > au) > > au) > > U > E E E 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L N 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L C C C C C C C C O C C C C C C C C C C - C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C H 4H H 4H H 4H H 4H H 4H H 4H H 4H \H \H H \H H \� H \� \� 2 > C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c C Cc C C C C C C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U C0 E En L C M c > co U) > p -9 0 0 Q U E C +U C C C c > OCD r ti > U)> 0> U)� 0 > > L U > < L O CA In C E 0 0- 0 > E 0>> Q U) OQ M (CO) E L O O c U U .� .� O> E N 0 Q 0 0 0- 0- Q i N N> ti N O N N N U L 00co 0 U 0 U 0 j 0 O Q O O E Q E Q E C .0 .L ai > C O O O O O - O �p �0 07 Q N 0) O d O L U +. C E C U C6 Q 0 > > �_ U) _ L Q� 7c Ci C 0 co CV O C ,O 0 U in a) :E- CD 0 LLJ �_ > 0 CA U 0 (6 a) Or) CO CO O a) O co U) U) r�_/� Q .Sm N .2) Q C 0 _a) 0 0 � E L 0 L L L �- O E C O +�+ c0 +=+ N U) CO T> 2` O U) cl 2) CAOOO CA N > L 1 uC � (>>n O�NN � E E 0 E 0N� O > O CO C-6 06 Q � U) U >>C > > > > >, co .2: E E � 0 • O/�� `l M1^�\1 2 C C 0 0) 0 > > U> Q V-C � 0 0 E >, N co O Z • 0 0 U) 0 M N (6 N\ C80D Q L L OCo Q Q (L Ui Q Cfl F- S Co (� f6 N Y Fu Y >+ m 0 L C0 m m N C\jQ L O LO 00 .r CO > (a 1 1 3 C6 >(6 > � 0 0)j N N @�� N 0 VNco> 0 U -It C) C)"tCO C)O> C �1 0o0 >+ > Cfl (6 > U N U) > Q > Q > (0 O N [L V N 2 2 Q U) U)U) Q M N L Q Q� 0 0 N O E > U) �t O N L f` O � 00 00O U) (Y co co co N C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 — c6 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0- Q 0- Q 0- Q 0- a 0- Q 0- Q 0- Q 0- Q 0- Q L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL LLL 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 136 1 Packet Pg. 431 10.4.a N N N O O O 1 r` 1 � 1 N N N N O O O O co N 0 0 O NO N 0 fl- M It N O -O O O O (D > N O N N N (6 N O N O O O O 0 O 0 O O O O O O Cfl c0 co LO ON E 0 (1) U N U 0 U N U N 2 N U O U N to O U N Mto O (1) Mn 0) U N U O) U N U N U N N O) U N U NO NO O O O U- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > N N N N LO N 0)0 L L 0) L 0) L 0) L 0) L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0 L 0) L 0 L 0 L 0 L O L 0 L 0) L 0 L E E -0 N O N -ON 0 O O O O O O O O O OC3�O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O U) N O N N cn 1 N O N O N O N O N O N CD N CD N CD N CD N CD N CD N N O N O N O N O N O N CD N N O O O O N O > N N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 >> > U Q O N N O L O N Nt It It It It It It It qt It qt It qtNt qt c0 U N O c N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0) ON - o f O 00000000000000C 0000 O E NO O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U L OL M O Cc) O CV N0L N NN N Q) O NN N c7 C c U O N Oc Oc Oc 0 Occ Oc OC OU > >> O co CD 0L) L L U N0 U) � � � � � � � w w w w � � � � � � � � N c \H cc c c c c c c c c c cc c c c c cc c c c O c c N p O `� O c -6 c "6 (0 m m c0 m N m N m c0 m c0 m c0 m N m m m c0 0 c c c O c E U U U U U U U U N U U U U U U U U U U E - c 0 'p N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U) p N r L Q U > -a_0 U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L U L a) c m c cu cu m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O 0 a) O a) a) 0) O� �� �� a) O O O O O O O O > () () -0 -0 > 0 > 0 (/� 0 (/� 0 (/� 0 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x UU2UU Q Q22U UU to tointoinuoiocnin inC0intAi)Cn L 00 CO > c .0 c N U O U 7 c O O cLo N -" N c c o U) U) 0 _ 2 a o U _ a... c -O O- U "O U c 0 c c CD Ocu .� 0) D O� p c 0 Lnot> fa) C N L O 0) L C 0) U U) _O Lco Q N -2) Q UcOti o O O U N N U (c6 QL N Qcn a) O >i N - (u c N U U) cB 0 O To2Q O L F- 00O O � �/ LL C L L > C C O c O >> U c M (n T c 4" IL 00 .� L U) O O O m = L L .O .- 0 O c c L Y U Y L U - c0 > O M 7 'U C1 E E U N c� cv co U J C-) c U O L O +. r^ i m d O U c < (n (n U) _U L ca U_ J L O c > c0 O d _� J Y Ea) L V J (V >l U E co L U L_ Qi L_ L � O L O m-0 >j U > 0 Q 'y-^+ C/J L N C (D V LL LL LL U) cn cn N M 0 _ G GU L.L O O U U L O � (� U [L c 0) = 2 (� O 0- c6 O= O J O� J C m M N > z L cu O -F- O aU O >__�-a L (6 L 0) C U � (n LL 0- Y Cn m O m 7 LL J M L O L^ U) a) co E C) c 0 m J m O N U) Q� LL CD Cn I- J 0 0 0 0 0 Z- - m - m - m - m N E E E E N U 0) U N U L U N N LD U N� U U LD U LD U N� U U N U N U N U 2 U N U 0) U N U N _ QQQQQ > U .0 .0 U .�.) U .0 •U •U •U •U U .0 U .0 U .0 .0 .0 vo^ v0^ v0^ v0^ v�^ V�^ L L LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL c4 O CLL.. c i O Q E R Q R U ca R a N ) WI R LL I1 U rn N O N 4 N O N N N O 0- 0 a H LL a LL U a_ C) N O J 3 a N O N 2024 PW CFP/CIP v1.10 137 1 Packet Pg. 432 rOft EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES 2024-2029 PROPOSED CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM r s -- 7� - / - ' 0 i DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2023 EDMONDS PARKS. RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Table of Contents Director's Letter................................................................ 2 CIP/CFP Worksheets.......................................................3-7 Project Distribution Map ................................................. 8 Project Descriptions......................................................9-31 Program Descriptions...................................................32-34 Acquisition Descriptions...............................................35-37 FundDetail..................................................................... 38 Fund 332 (Capital Const. & Impact Fee) Detail ............39-40 Fund 125 (REET 11) Detail ................................................ 41 Fund 126 (REET 1) Detail ................................................. 42 Fund 143 (Tree) Detail .................................................... 43 Fund 137 (Cemetery) Detail ........................................... 44 Annual Project Comparison ............................................ 45 r n r,kL 10.4. b EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES September 19, 2023 Members of the City Council, Parks & Planning Board, Staff and Citizens of Edmonds, The following document outlines the 6-year Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The CIP/CFP serve as a planning guide identifying parks capital projects and related funding sources and reflects the priorities established in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan based largely on citizens' priorities. The CIP/CFP is updated annually through a public process including presentations and Public Hearings hosted by both the Parks & Planning Board and the City Council. There were several significant Parks Capital project accomplishments in 2023 to include: 1. Completion of the 8-acre Civic Center Playfield two-year construction project with a June 23rd Grand Opening. 2. Completion of the 96th Avenue Infiltration project required for Civic Center Playfield which will significantly reduce the contaminated water run-off into Shell Creek in Yost Park. 3. An Interlocal Agreement with City of Mountlake Terrace supporting the Ballinger Park Phase 3 development to provide improved park access for Edmonds residents. The 2023 projects in process include: 1. Demolition of the structures on the property donated by Shirley Johnson (abatement completed). 2. Improvements to the Edmonds Lake Ballinger Access (McAleer) area. 3. Improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park — engineering completed, and permit submitted for paved path, shade structure, permanent restroom and parking improvements. 4. Tree maintenance for large oak trees at 5th and Main. 5. Many deferred maintenance projects throughout the park system. After completing two significant multi -million -dollar park projects consecutively (Edmonds Waterfront Center and Civic Center Playfield), the Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department will turn our focus on deferred maintenance throughout the city's existing parks system and recreation facilities. Further, the department will remain focused on acquisition of additional parkland to fill system gaps in park services and to address inequities in parkland distribution as identified in the 2022 PROS Plan. Your Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department is proud to serve the citizens and visitors of Edmonds and we look forward keeping the Edmonds parks safe, accessible, and enjoyable for all. Sincerely, I ,SL�w ti-- Angie Feser Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director 425-771-0256 Angie.Feser@EdmondsWA.gov Page 2 Packet Pg. 435 2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10.4.b Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site & Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Tot: # Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD* D19 Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III $ 200,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 200,0( Development. Payment due upon completion of project. D5 Mathay Ballinger Park *CARRYFORWARD* D6 Construction of improvements including permanent restroom, paved trail, picnic $ 271,300 $ $ $ $ $ $ 271,3( D7 shelter ADA access and other amenities. Shell Creek Restoration *CARRYFORWARD* R19 Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based $ 120,000 $ 380,000 $ $ $ $ $ 500,0( on study. Study in 2024, work in 2025. R9 Yost Park & Pool R4 Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include resurface of tennis courts $ 154,300 $ 1,296,400 $ $ $ $ $ 1,450,7( R6 and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs/replacement in 2024, inclusive - - - - R11 playground and pool upgrades in 2025. Columbarium Expansion - Phase II D8 Expansion of the current columbarium. Funding provided through the Cemetery $ $ 159,100 $ $ $ $ $ 159,1( Trust Fund 137. Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting X D20 In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ $ $ $ 1,500,0( and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and future construction of two additional fields. Neighborhood Park SE 1 X D13 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds $ $ 79,600 $ 819,500 $ $ $ $ 899,1( (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase). R8 Sierra Park $ $ - $ 415,000 $ $ $ $ 415,0( Playground replacement and upgrade to inclusive standards. R7 Olympic Beach Park $ $ 20,000 $ 33,000 $ $ $ $ 53,0( Renovation of existing restrooms. Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) 08 c IL d r ca u_ Q U rn N 0 N 1* N 0 N N W O O_ O L IL Page 3 Packet Pg. 436 2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10.4.b Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site & Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Tot: # D10 Pine Street Park D11 Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, $ $ 40,000 $ 124,400 $ $ $ $ 164,4( D12 canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway. Johnson Property R2 Master plan for future park use. Site development not included in estimate. $ $ $ 82,000 $ $ $ $ 82,0( P5 Demolition, debris removal and site security completed in 2023. Neighborhood Park SR99 X D15 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast $ $ $ 82,000 $ 844,100 $ $ $ 926,1( Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase). x P1 Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building $ $ $ 1,125,500 $ 4,637,100 $ $ $ 5,762,6( D2 Replace and/or renovate shop facilities located in City Park. R12 Maplewood Hill Park $ $ $ - $ 347,800 $ $ $ 347,8( Playground replacement. Neighborhood Park SE 2 X D18 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast $ $ $ $ 84,400 $ 869,500 $ $ 953,9( Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase). Waterfront Walkway P3 Connecting the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to $ $ $ $ $ 515,000 $ 819,500 $ 1,334,5( D14 Marina Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide _ Condominiums, to provide ADA improvements. R16 Seaview Park $ $ $ $ $ 417,900 $ - $ 417,9( Replacement of permanent restroom to provide ADA upgrades. D16 Elm Street Park D17 Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, $ $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ 340,370 $ 440,3, R14 small shelter with picnic tables and habitat restoration. Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) 08 c IL N d r u_ CL U rn N 0 N 1* N 0 N N U) O O_ O L IL Page 4 Packet Pg. 437 2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10.4.b Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site & Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Tot: # X R15 Pool Replacement $ $ $ $ $ $ 23,881,000 $ 23,881,0( Replacement of the existing Yost pool. Design, location, and funding TBD. Meadowdale Playfields R3 Renovations as suggested by the City of Lynnwood and consistent with re TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD $ negotiated and updated Interlocal Agreement. May include addition of dugout - roofs, light replacement and playground upgrade. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Master Plan development and implementation of the Edmonds Marsh to daylight X P4 D9 the waterway connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and two fresh TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD $ water creeks providing restoration of fresh water/salt water estuary and natural - D1 tidal exchange. (All expenses are TBD per Council direction in December 2022). Acquisition funding identified in Parkland Acquisition program. (A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS $ 745,600 $ 3,475,100 $ 2,681,400 $ 5,913,400 $ 1,902,400 $ 25,040,870 $ 33,070,01 Costs inflated at 3% per year Project PARKS CIP PROGRAMS 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Tot: Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program R17 Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular and deferred maintenance, $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,700,0( repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment. Signage & Wayfinding R10 Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,0( consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system. Parkland Acquisition Support $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,0( Funds utilized to evaluate potential acquisitions and complete due diligence. Debt Service and Interfund Transfers Debt service on Civic Park $1.6M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 738,0( Engineering for Capital Project Support. (B) SUBTOTAL - PARKS CIP PROGRAMS $ 698,000 $ 623,000 $ 623,000 $ 623,000 $ 623,000 $ 623,000 $ 3,813,0( Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) 08 Page 5 Packet Pg. 438 2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10.4.b Costs inflated at 3% per year Project PARKLAND ACQUISITION 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Tot: X A2 Neighborhood Park SE 1 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ $ $ $ $ 1,500,0( Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds. X A3 Neighborhood Park SR99 $ - $ 1,545,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,545,0( Acquisition of parkland near SR 99. X A4 Neighborhood Park SE 2 $ $ - $ 2,185,500 $ $ $ $ 2,185,5( Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds. A5 Interurban Trail $ $ $ $ $ $ 895,585 $ 895,5i Acquisition for trail extension. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) X Al Acquisition of the Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD $ - restoration. (C) SUBTOTAL - PARKLAND ACQUISITION $ 1,500,000 $ 1,545,000 $ 2,185,500 $ - $ $ 895,585 $ 6,126,Of 08 c O IL W r .v cc u_ CL U rn N O N 1* N O N N W O O_ O L IL H u_ Q a (D) TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B+C) $ 2,943,600 $ 5,643,100 $ 5,489,900 $ 6,536,400 $ 2,525,400 $ 26,559,455 $ 43,009,1! V a PARKS CIP REVENUE 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Tot: Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,01 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 9,500,0 Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,800,0 Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 1,290,0 Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - Columbarium Expansion $ 159,100 $ 159,1( ARPA Contribution - Shell Creek Study $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ 120,0( Investment Interest (3%) $ 18,918 $ 24,795 $ 30,849 $ 37,085 $ 43,507 $ 50,122 $ 205,2- Donations $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ $ Bond Proceeds $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Secured Grants $ $ $ - $ $ - $ $ Unsecured Grants/Funding - non -land acquisition $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,945,000 $ 5,481,200 $ 869,500 $ 24,756,800 $ 34,552,5( (E) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE $ 2,853,918 $ 3,898,895 $ 4,190,849 $ 7,733,285 $ 3,128,007 $ 27,021,922 $ 48,E26 v N Y i a It N O N N C N E s c� O r r Q C N E t c� Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) w Q Page 6 Packet Pg. 439 2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10.4.b Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 (F) Beginning Fund Balance $ 3,150,795 $ 3,061,113 $ 1,316,908 $ 17,857 $ 1,214,742 $ 1,817,349 (E) Revenue $ 2,853,918 $ 3,898,895 $ 4,190,849 $ 7,733,285 $ 3,128,007 $ 27,021,922 (D) Expenditures $ 2,943,600 $ 5,643,100 $ 5,489,900 $ 6,536,400 $ 2,525,400 $ 26,559,455 (G) Ending Fund Balance (F+E-D) $ 3,061,113 $ 1,316,908 $ 17,857 $ 1,214,742 $ 1,817,349 $ 2,279,817 Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) Page 7 Packet Pg. 440 10.4. b P5 Johnson Property R3 Meadowdale Playfields D6 Mathay Ballinger Park R9, R4, R6, R11 Yost Park & Pool D19 Lake Ballinger Park (MLT) D8 Columbarium Expansion - Phase II i R7 Olympic Beach Park D10, D11, D12 Pine Street Park R8 Sierra Park P3, D14 Waterfront Walkway R12 Maplewood Hill Park P4, D9, D1 Edmonds Marsh Restoration _ D16, D17, R14 Elm Street Park P1, D2 Parks Maintenance Building R16 Seaview Park R15 Pool Replacement Al Edmonds Marsh Restoration A5 Interurban Trail R19 Shell Creek Restoration � D20 Woodway Campus Athletic Complex MILE`� * Non -site specific projects A2 , P2, D13 Neighborhood Park SE 1 A3, P6, D15 Neighborhood Park SR99 A4, P7, D18 Neighborhood Park SE 2 R17 Citywide Park Improvements R10 Signage & Wayfinding r40 D1 P4 D1 Al • D9 P1 ID2 MrA XV14 19 • * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown DRAFT I Packet Pg. 441 10.4. b 2024-2029 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan PROJECTS � ... 1 Y� � �. �.�1 ,rep �y� �y��,• f 11;�d`+. 1 . C Yi r i� x 7 (', (� .>A �yy�'�+J"',,y�il�i � Q y l F �4 ) �I -� N 'ij � �J�� Si Y ('ryy' ✓ ' ,�"1� F �Fi '.� �*M� l:(A /�y� � 1 Y� � i �1 '} M 1 �✓" i .rb A- , . EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Page 9 Packet Pg. 442 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Lake Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA — D19 v Interurban Trad Improved Park Entry Proposed Crossing by the U S. _rfr' Army Corps of Engineers J Senior Center Proposed Channel by the 6 ft Asphalt Path U.S. Army Corps of Engineers I 6 It Wood Chips Path`* a 6 ft Gravel Path Proposed Boardwalk by the U.S. f _ _- Army Corps of Engineers t Boardwalk & Viewing Platform Lake Ballinger � Lake Ballinger Park, City of Mountlake Terrace I Project Summary: Through an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mountlake Terrace, the City of Edmonds will I support the construction of the planned improvements in the northwest area of Lake Ballinger Park including a park ! entry, pathways and access to Lake Ballinger. The project is underway and payment is due upon completion of the I project. I I I Project Justification: This western boundary of the park is Edmonds city limits and these improvements will provide I better access to Lake Ballinger Park for Edmonds residents. The revenue contribution supports the construction of the improvements which will benefit the City of Edmonds. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan including 3 Recommendations, 1 Goal and 3 Objectives. Recommendation 1.2 Expand partnerships and agreements with other nearby jurisdictions. Recommendation 3.6 Explore options for access to Lake Ballinger with the City of Mountlake Terrace to include possible joint development and consideration of a fishing pier. Recommendation 5.2 Repair and improve or extend trails and boardwalks to allow improved public access to natural areas for nature/wildlife viewing, hiking and outdoor experience. PROS Goal 3, Objectives 3.2, 3.8 and 3.11. Estimated Cost: $200,000 Page 10 Packet Pg. 443 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Mathay Ballinger Park - D6 24100 78th Place West Project Summary: Park improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park began in 2023 and are continuing into 2024. Improvements include the addition of a permanent restroom, a shelter with picnic tables and a paved pathway to provide ADA accessibility to the playground as well as connect the paved Interurban Trail spur. Approximately $228,000 was expended in 2023 for the engineering, permitting and restroom procurement. Project Justification: Upgrades to this park are supported by 5 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 8 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.3 is to prioritize improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park and upgrade, enhance or replace park amenities, specifically the play amenities. Recommendation 3.5 is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park... and paved pathway connections in Mathay Ballinger Park. Recommendation 6.4 is to install permanent restrooms at Marina Beach Park and Mathay Ballinger Park. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.6, Goal 3 Objectives 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9 Goal 9 Objective 9.1 and Recommendations 3.1 and 6.2 also align with these upgrades. Estimated Cost: $499,300 (approx. $228,000 expended in 2023) Page 11 Packet Pg. 444 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Shell Creek Restoration — R19 Shell Creek, Yost Park Project Summary: Restorative work of Shell Creek waterway in Yost Park to address erosion issues. Scope of this work will be determined based on a study conducted in 2024. The goal of the study is to determine what improvements are needed to support a healthy environment for the natural ecosystem within the park. and decrease stream bed erosion. With Shell Creek in its entirety being a salmon -bearing stream silting issues caused by erosion within Yost Park may impact spawning habitat. Erosion has caused closure of a pedestrian bridge in the upper creek corridor in the park, causing significant impact to trail users by lack of ability to cross the creek to access both sides of the park. In addition, other pedestrian bridges are deteriorating and in short order, require replacement. Restoration, including near t erm actions to address severe erosion issues caused by the creek, may include habitat and environmental protection and enhancement, mitigation opportunities and potential trail and bridge relocations. Project Justification: The 45-acre Yost Park, containing a portion of Shell Creek, has a need to prevent erosive conditions. This work is the second phase in addressing the pedestrian system (boardwalks, bridges, and trails) and Shell Creek water quality and health. 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan - Goal 3: Parks, Trails & Open Space, Objectives 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4: Waterfront Use & Access, Objectives 4.2 and 4.4; Goal 5: Natural Resource & Habitat Conservation Objectives, 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6: Climate Change, Adaptation & Resiliency, Objective 6.5; and Goal 9: Park Operations & Administration Objectives 9.1 and 9.2. Estimated Cost: $500,000 Construction (R19) — Creek Restoration 2024 $120,000 2025 2026 $380,000 2027Total $500,000 Total Expenses $120,000 $380,000 $500,000 ARPA Funding Transfer $120,000 $120,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II — Fund 125 $380,000 $380,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $120,000 i $380,000 $500,000 Page 12 Packet Pg. 445 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Yost Park & Pool - R91 R41 R6 & R11 96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park Project Summary: Future Park enhancements, repair, and maintenance to include a playground replacement, resurface of tennis/pickleball courts, pool upgrades and trail, bridge, and boardwalk repairs / replacement. The playground at Yost Park installed in 1995, is 27 years old, has reached the end of its lifecycle, is not ADA accessible and is scheduled to be replaced in 2025. Project Justification: To maintain safety amenities should be repaired and/or replaced as supported in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan Recommendation 3.1 which is to maintain, renovate or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety and Recommendation 3.4 replace the playgrounds at... Yost Memorial Park. In addition, this work is supported by PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1 and 1.4; Goal 3, Objective 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4, Objective 4.4, Goal 5, Objective 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.5; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.10 and 6.2 for a total of 4 Recommendations, 6 Goals and 9 Objectives. Estimated Cost: $1,450,700 Construction (M) — Bridge repairs $80,000 $80,000 Construction (R6) — Playground Replacement $750,000 $750,000 Construction (R9)—Tennis Court Resurface $74,300 $74,300 Construction (R11) — Pool Upgrades $546,400 $546,400 Total Expenses $154,300 $1,296,400 1,450,700 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $154,300 $1,296,400 1,450,700 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $154,300 i 1 $1,296,400 1,450,700 Page 13 Packet Pg. 446 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Olympic Beach Park - R7 —.JV a. 200 Admiral Way, Entrance of the Fishing Pier Project Summary: Renovation of existing restroom and Visitor Center. Project Justification: This work is supported by 3 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park and Brackett's Landing North. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 4, Objective 4.1; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 6.3 also align with these upgrades. Estimated Cost: $53,000 Planning (R7) — Restroom Renovation $20,000 $20,000 Construction (R7) — Restroom Renovation $33,000 $33,000 Total Expenses $20,000 $33,000 $53,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $20,000 $33,000 $53,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $20,000 so $33,000 $0 $53,000 $1 Page 14 Packet Pg. 447 10.4. b Parks & Recreation D20: Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase I Lighting 23200 1001h Ave. W Project Summary: This project consists of two components: Phase I lighting addition, Phase II renovation of existing underdeveloped athletic field and would be coordinated with the property owner, Edmonds School District. Project Justification: By adding lighting to the renovated Phase I year-round field, usage of the multi -use facility would significantly increase. Phase II would renovate a currently poorly maintained and underutilized large athletic field to provide community significantly more multi -sport use of an existing facility. This Athletic Complex serves a densely populated area of more than 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance costs could be offset by user fees. Phase I without lighting installation was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phase II estimated at $6-8M with funding and timing undetermined. This partnership improvement is supported by a Recommendation, 2 Goals and 5 Objectives in the 2022 PROS Plan including Recommendation 3.2 "expand partnerships and agreements with Edmonds School District ... to provide public access and opportunities for outdoor recreation". And PROS Plan Goal 3, Objectives 3.3, 3.9, 3.10 and 3.11; and Goal 9, Objective 9.4. Estimated Cost: Phase I Lighting: $1,500,000; Phase II: $6 — 8M Page 15 Packet Pg. 448 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Park SE 1— P2, D13 Project Summary: Acquire and develop an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized (see Land Acquisition Section for details) a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan. Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park. Estimated Cost: $899,100 + Parkland Acquisition Planning— Neighborhood Park SE 1 (P2) $79,600 2029 Total $79,600 Construction — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (D13) $819,500 $819,500 Total Expenses $79,600 $819,500 $899,100 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $79,600 $79,600 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $79,600 $0 00 $79,600 00 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 16 Packet Pg. 449 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Sierra Park — R8 81st Ave W & 190th St SW Project Summary: Replacement of the playground and fall surfacing at Sierra Park. The playground is 27 years old and is currently the smallest and most limited playground in the park system. The new playground is intended to be inclusive level design. Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8, Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.1 also align with these improvements. Estimated Cost: $415,000 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 17 Packet Pg. 450 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Pine Street Park - D10, D11 & D12 6th and Pine Street Project Summary: Park improvements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, canopy shade trees and a paved interior connecting pathway. Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.5 is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park and paved pathway connections in Mathay Ballinger Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with these improvements. Estimated Cost: $164,400 Planning (D10, 11, 12) $40,000 2028 2029 Total $40,000 Construction (D10) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables $59,600 $59,600 Construction (D11) — Paved Pathway $38,300 $38,300 Construction (D12) — Canopy Shade Trees $26,500 $26,500 Total Expenses $40,000 $124,400 $164,400 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $40,000 $124,400 $164,400 Total Revenue $40,000 1 $124,400 $164,400 Page 18 Packet Pg. 451 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Maplewood Hill Park — R12 19800 89th PI W Project Summary: Replacement of the existing playground installed in 1985. This playground is 38 years old and is the oldest in the park system. Project Justification: This improvement is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.1 also align with this improvement. Estimated Cost: $347,800 Page 19 Packet Pg. 452 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Park SR 99 — P6 & D15 Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SR 99 area to address an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized (see Land Acquisition Section for details) a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan. Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park. Estimated Cost: $926,100 + Parkland Acquisition Planning— Neighborhood Park SR99 (P6) $82,000 $82,000 Construction — Neighborhood Park SR 99 (D15) $844,100 $844,100 Total Expenses F7 $82,000 $844,100 $926,100 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $82,000 $82,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $82,000 $0 00 $82,000 00 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 20 Packet Pg. 453 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Johnson Property - P5 9309 Bowdoin Way Project Summary: This project is to design a master plan for this 1-acre property donated by Shirley Johnson in 2021. The house and outbuildings were removed in 2023. The site includes historic fruit and nut trees which have all been neglected for years. The master planning process uses a combination of park system -wide goals (PROS Plan), property opportunities and constraints and community input on future design and usage for the space and provides supporting documentation for potential grants for future improvements. Project Justification: This project is supported by 1 Recommendation, 5 Goals and 11 Objectives of the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.1 — Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.7, 3.8 and 3.10; Goal 5, Objective 5.1; Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5; Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.5 also align with this project. Estimated Cost: $82,000 024 Planning & Design (P5) $82,000 $82,000 Total Expenses $82,000 $82,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $82,000 $82,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $82,000 $0 $82,000 $0 Page 21 Packet Pg. 454 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building - P1 & D2 600 3rd Avenue South, City Park Project Summary: Replacement of 40+year old Parks and Facilities Maintenance building and renovation of the yard area in City Park. Currently undersized to accommodate staff, vehicles and equipment, mechanical work spaces and employee facilities and the facility is reaching the end of its useful life. Project Justification: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment storage in order to more efficiently maintain City parks and Capital facilities. The city's small equipment repair garage is used as the Park Maintenance locker room, daily meeting room, computer access (two for 17 FTEs) and work preparation space. It is insufficient for work efficiency and creates a conflicting work space of small machinery repair and gathering space. This project is supported by 1 Goals, 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.9 align with this project. Estimated Cost: $5,762,600 Planning & Design (P1) $1,125,500 $1,125,500 Construction (D2) $4,637,100 $4,637,100 Total Expenses $1,125,500 $4,637,100 $5,762,600 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fees — Fund 332-100 Bond Proceeds Operating Contribution — General Fund Park Donations Total Revenue Unsecured Funding 00 00 .00 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 22 Packet Pg. 455 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Columbarium Expansion Phase II — D8 820 15th St SW, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Project Summary: Expansion of the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Columbarium. Funding provided through the Cemetery Trust Fund 137 which accumulates fund balance based on Cemetery usage and revenue generated. Project Justification: As the existing columbarium continues to fill up, it is appropriate to begin planning for the Phase II expansion. The design is complete and since it is continuation of phase improvements, could be relatively simple to implement. Estimated Cost: $159,100 Page 23 Packet Pg. 456 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section - P3 & D14 Beachfront in front of Ebb Tide Condominiums (200 Beach Place) Project Summary: This improvement would provide a continuous ADA accessible waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to Marina Beach Park ensuring all individuals, including those with mobility challenges and those using wheeled carriers can safely enjoy the waterfront. The final missing piece is a constructed pathway beach side of the Ebb Tide condominiums in the easement owned by the City of Edmonds. Project Justification: To provide public ADA access along the waterfront for all individuals. Completion of the walkway would meet ADA requirements, support efforts to keep dogs off of the beaches and was recognized as a high priority by residents participating in the development of the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. This project is supported by 1 Recommendation, 3 Goals and 5 Objectives in the PROS Plan. Recommendation 6.2 is to implement upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure universal accessibility to include required parking, providing ramped entrances and site furnishings. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4, Goal 6, Objective 6.7 also align with this project. Estimated Cost: $1,334,500 Planning & Design $515,000 $515,000 Construction $819,500 $819,500 Total Expenses $515,000 $819,500 $1,334,500 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $515,000 $515,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $515,000 $515,000 ii ii Page 24 Packet Pg. 457 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Park SE 2 — P7, D18 f 11 Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition (see Land Acquisition Section for details) has been authorized a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan. Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park. Estimated Cost: $953,900 + Parkland Acquisition *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 25 Packet Pg. 458 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Seaview Park Restroom — R16 80th Ave W & 186th St SW Project Summary: Improvements to include renovation or replacement of the permanent restroom to provide ADA compliant facilities. Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 3 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 6 is to make improvements to existing parks as needed to ensure proper maintenance, usability and quality of park features and grounds to remove barriers and improve universal access. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park and Brackett's Landing North. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendations 3.1 and 6.2 also align with these improvements. Estimated Cost: $417,900 Construction (R16) — Restroom Replacement $417,900 $417,900 Total Expenses $417,900 $417,900 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $417,900 $417,900 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $417,900 $0 $417,900 $0 Page 26 Packet Pg. 459 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Elm Street Park - D161 D17 & R14 ".0 J-1-.1 7th & Elm Street Project Summary: Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, small shelter with picnic tables and habitat restoration. Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.1 is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 6, Objective 6.5; Goal 9, Objective 9.1; and Recommendation 3.5 also align with these improvements. Estimated Cost: $440,370 Planning (R14, D16, D17) $100,000 $100,000 Construction (R14) — Habitat Restoration $56,300 $56,300 Construction (D16) — Nature Playground $199,670 $199,670 Construction (D17) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables $84,400 $84,400 Total Expenses $100,000 $340,370 $440,370 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $100,000 $284,070 $384,070 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $100,000 i $284,070 i0 $384,070 0i Page 27 Packet Pg. 460 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Yost Pool Replacement — R15 96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park Project Summary: Yost Pool was built nearly 50 years ago and continues to provide recreational opportunities for many residents and visitors. In addition to teaching youth lifesaving water safety, the pool serves as an opportunity for community members of all ages to lead healthy and active lifestyles. Funding for this project has not been identified and would likely require voter approval. Project Justification: Replacing Yost Pool is supported by 4 Recommendations, 4 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 4 is to replace Yost Pool. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 7, Objective 7.4; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendations 3.1, 4.1, 4.2 and 6.2 also align with this replacement. Estimated Cost: $23,881,000 Planning & Construction (1115) 2028 2029 $23,881,000 Total $23,881,000 Total Expenses $23,881,000 $23,881,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees Secured Grants Bonds Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $0 000($23,88,100011 $0 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 28 Packet Pg. 461 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Meadowdale Playfields - R3 168th ST SW, Lynnwood Project Summary: Currently identifying potential budget allocation for shared improvements and related expenditures dependent upon pending Interlocal Agreement negotiations. Project Justification: The cities of Lynnwood and Edmonds and Edmonds School District currently have an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) for Meadowdale Park for shared cost of capital improvements, renovations, and ongoing maintenance. This work is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 5 Objectives of the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1.2 — Expand partnerships and agreements with the Edmonds School District, Snohomish County, and other nearby jurisdictions (cities of Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, Woodway, and Shoreline) to improve public access and opportunities for outdoor recreation and Recommendation 6.2 - Implement upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure universal accessibility to include required parking, providing ramped entrances and site furnishings. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.6; Goal 3, Objective 3.8, 3.10 and 3.11 and Goal 7, Objective 7.2 also align with this work. Estimated Cost: TBD, negotiations are ongoing with the City of Lynnwood. Construction (R3) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Total Expenses TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Ending Fund Balance/Impact Fees - 332 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Total Revenue TBD TBD TBD TBD i TBD i TBD TBD Page 29 Packet Pg. 462 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Edmonds Marsh -Estuary Expansion & Restoration - Al, P4, D9 & D1 Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh, Marina Beach Park and property owned by Unocal (Chevron) Project Summary: Reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh near -shore estuary by restoring the natural tidal exchange. This project will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation including daylighting of Willow Creek within the park and the Edmonds Marsh. In addition, this project encompasses the possible acquisition or use of the adjacent 21-acre parcel known as the Unocal property to support a larger estuary restoration project. Once acquired, an integrated restoration plan can be developed to restore functioning conditions of the tidal wetland for salmon recovery, wildlife conservation and improved public access for recreational use, environmental education and wildlife viewing. Project Justification: The marsh estuary restoration project will allow for and provide a natural tidal exchange, allow salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek, support migratory birds and waterfowl, provide a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna and address sea level rise impacts. This project is supported by 3 Recommendations, 5 Goals and 8 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 2.2 — Expand the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary to include the Unocal property. Develop funding strategy for purchase of the Unocal property or negotiate with the State of Washington to have the property become part of the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 4, Objective 4.3; Goal 5, Objectives 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.5 and 6.7; Goal 9, Objective 9.1; Recommendation 2.1 and 3.11 also align with this project. Estimated Cost: TBD Acquisition and Planning + Restoration + Marina Beach Park renovation Continued on next page. Page 30 Packet Pg. 463 10.4. b Edmonds Marsh -Estuary Expansion & Restoration— continued. . 2027 2028 2029 Total Land Acquisition (Al) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Master Plan (P4) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Master Plan Implementation (D9) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Restoration (D1) -TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Total Expenses TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Real Estate Excise Tax I — Fund 126 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees Bond Proceeds Secured Grants Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition Park Donations Operating Contribution — General Fund Stormwater — Fund 422 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBID Project Accounting #M070 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Expense estimates and funding sources changed to TBD per Council direction December 2022. Page 31 Packet Pg. 464 10.4. b 2024-2029 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan PROGRAMS EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Page 32 Packet Pg. 465 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program - R17 �4- A rm a Project Summary: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) plan identified a significant list of deferred park maintenance projects. With the addition of a Parks Capital Project Manager, hired in 2022 and the Job Order Contracting program, the Parks Department will continue to make progress on the numerous system -wide repairs, renovations and replacements of an aging parks infrastructure. Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and related assets lead to higher deferred maintenance costs, increased City liability and decreased level of service and community satisfaction. This program is supported by 5 Recommendations, 6 Goals and 21 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.1 is to Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objectives 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2, 4.4; Goal 5, Objective 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5 and 6.7; Goal 9, Objective 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.9 and Recommendations 3.7, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 also align with this program. Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 (6-year total) 024 2025 Repair & Maintenance $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000 Professional Services $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 Total Expenses $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000 Total Revenue $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000 Unsecured Funding i i i Page 33 Packet Pg. 466 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Signage & Wayfinding — R10 � •VIEW POINT PLAY STRUCTURE NATURAL AREA&DOG WALK PARKOPEN DAWN TO DUSK Project Summary: Update park and recreation facilities signage system -wide to include uniform and accurate trail identification information, orientation markers, safety and regulatory messaging, park hours, park rules and etiquette, interpretive information and warning signs. Project Justification: A comprehensive and consistent signage system is necessary to inform, orient and educate park users. This program is supported by 2 Recommendations, 4 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) plan. Recommendation 6.5 is to develop and provide consistent graphics and citywide signage to improve communication on access, usability and "branding" of the city's park and open space system. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objective 3.6; Goal 5, Objectives 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with this program. Estimated Cost: $75,000 Page 34 Packet Pg. 467 91 2024-2029 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan PARKLAND ACQUISITION r-. EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Page 35 Packet Pg. 468 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Parkland Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1, SR 99 & SE 2 - A2, A3 & A4 Project Summary: Acquisition of parkland that will benefit citizens and support the priorities identified in the PROS Plan. Currently, $1,100,000 is reserved for parkland and open space acquisition. These funds were accumulated from 2019 through 2023. There is no specific request to purchase a particular parcel as opportunities are somewhat limited in a mostly built -out city, but staff continues to search for, develop and negotiate opportunities. Project Justification: Parkland Acquisitions are supported by 1 Recommendation, 2 Goals and 5 Objectives (land purchase only, see previous projects for development) in the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.9 also align with the acquisition of parkland. Estimated Cost: $5,230,500 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (A2) $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3) $1,545,000 $1,545,000 Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4) $2,185,500 $2,185,500 Total Expenses $1,500,000 $1,545,000 $2,185,500 $5,230,500 Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $1,300,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,700,000 Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD Total Revenue $1,300,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,700,000 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 36 Packet Pg. 469 10.4. b Parks & Recreation Interurban Trail Expansion — A5 24100 78th Place West Project Summary: Acquisition of additional lands, easements and/or right-of-ways to continue the Interurban Trail, including more off -road segments. Project Justification: This Expansion is supported by 3 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 5 is to improve trail connections including sidewalks and bike lanes to help link destinations across the community. Recommendation 5.1 suggests the City peruse opportunities to acquire additional lands, easements and/or right of way to continue the Interurban Trail. Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6 and Recommendations 1.1 and 5.2 also align with this expansion. Estimated Cost: $895,585 Land Acquisition — Park Facilities (A5) $895,585 $895,585 Total Expenses $895,585 $895,585 Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition Total Revenue Unsecured Funding ($895,585) ($895,585) Page 37 Packet Pg. 470 10.4. b 2024-2029 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan FUND DETAIL EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Page 38 Packet Pg. 471 Fund 332 10.4.b Costs inflated at 3% per year Fund 332 Expenditures 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total D9 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan Implementation) $ D1 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Restoration) $ - R14 Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration $ 56,300 $ 56,300 D6 Mathay Ballinger Park Permanent Restrooms $ 100,000 $ R3 Meadowdale Playfields (Renovations, City of Lynnwood ILA) $ - D13 Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Park Development) $ 819,500 $ 819,500 D15 Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Park Development) $ 844,100 $ 844,100 D18 Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Park Development) $ 869,500 $ 869,500 R15 Pool Replacement $ 23,881,000 $ 23,881,000 P1 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design) $ 1,125,500 $ 1,125,500 D2 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Construction) $ 4,637,100 $ 4,637,100 R19 Shell Creek Restoration (Yost Park) $ 120,000 $ 120,000 D14 Waterfront Walkway (Construction) $ 819,500 $ 819,500 D20 Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Interfund Services 1 $ 68,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 150,000 Debt Service Civic Park $1.6M (2021) 1 $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ 98,0001 $ 98,0001 $ 98,000 $ 98,000 $ 98,0001 $ 588,000 (C) TOTAL Fund 332 Expenditures 1 $ 266,000 1 $ 243,000 $ 1,623,000 1 $ 2,068,000 1 $ 5,604,200 $ 992,500 $24,879,800 1 $35,410,500 Fund 332 Revenue 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Park Impact Fees (Fund 332-100) $ 682,681 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,800,000 Investment Interest (3%) $ 6,230 $ 18,918 $ 24,795 $ 30,849 $ 37,085 $ 43,507 $ 50,122 $ 205,277 Miscellaneous Park Donations $ - Bond Proceeds $ - ARPA Transfer - Shell Creek Restoration (Study) $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Unsecured Funding - Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase 1 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Unsecured Grants - Marsh Estuary Restoration $ - Unsecured Grants - Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration $ 56,300 $ 56,300 Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SE 1 (Development) $ 819,500 $ 819,500 Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SR99 (Development) $ 844,100 $ 844,100 Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SE 2 (Development) $ 869,500 $ 869,500 Unsecured Funding (Bonds, Levy, Misc.) Pool Replacement $ 23,881,000 $ 23,881,000 Unsecured Funding Park Facilities M&O Building $ 1,125,500 $ 4,637,100 $ 5,762,600 Unsecured Grants - Waterfront Walkway (Construction) $ 819,500 $ 819,500 (D) TOTAL Fund 332 Revenue $ 688,911 $ 438,918 1 $ 1,824,795 $ 2,275,849 $ 5,818,285 $ 1,213,007 $25,106,922 $36,677,777 08 C R a N 41 r LL CL O U N O N 4 N O N N N O CL O a I- LL Q r� a LL U a v N Y i a N 0 N N C N E s 0 O r Q r-� C N E t V M Page 39 Packet Pg. 472 Fund 332 10.4.b Fund 332 Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 (E) Beginning Fund Balance (332 + 332-100) $ 207,683 $ 630,594 $ 826,512 $ 1,028,308 $ 1,236,157 $ 1,450,242 $ 1,670,749 (D) Revenue $ 688,911 $ 438,918 $ 1,824,795 $ 2,275,849 $ 5,818,285 $ 1,213,007 $ 25,106,922 (C) Expenditures $ 266,000 $ 243,000 $ 1,623,000 $ 2,068,000 $ 5,604,200 $ 992,500 $ 24,879,800 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 630,594 $ 826,512 $ 1,028,308 $ 1,236,157 $ 1,450,242 $ 1,670,749 $ 1,897,871 Project Type: A Acquisition P Master Planning D Development - New R Replacement/Upgrade Page 40 Packet Pg. 473 REET II Fund 125 10.4.b Costs inflated at 3% per year REET II(Fund 125)Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total P4 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan) $ - D16 Elm Street Park (Nature Playground) $ 100,000 $ 199,670 $ 299,670 D17 Elm Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ 84,400 $ 84,400 R2 Johnson Property (Demo & Secure Site) $ P5 lJohnson Property (Master Plan) $ 82,000 $ 82,000 R12 Maplewood Hill Park (Playground Replacement) $ 347,800 $ 347,800 D5 Mathay Ballinger Park (Paved Loop Pathway) $ D7 Mathay Ballinger Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ - D6 Mathay Ballinger Park Permanent Restrooms $ 271,300 $ 271,300 D19 Mountlake Terrace ILA (Lake Ballinger Park)* $ 200,000 $ 200,000 P2 Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Master Plan) $ 79,600 $ 79,600 P6 Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Master Plan) $ 82,000 $ 82,000 P7 Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Master Plan) $ 84,400 $ 84,400 R7 Olympic Beach Park (Restroom Upgrade) $ 20,000 $ 33,000 $ 53,000 D10 Pine Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ 20,000 $ 59,600 $ 79,600 D11 Pine Street Park (Paved Connecting Pathway) $ 20,000 $ 38,300 $ 58,300 D12 Pine Street Park (Canopy Shade Trees) $ 26,500 $ 26,500 R16 Seaview Park (Restroom Replacement) $ 417,900 $ 417,900 R19 Shell Creek Restoration (Yost Park) $ 380,000 $ 380,000 R8 Sierra Park (Playground Replacement) $ 415,000 $ 415,000 P3 Waterfront Walkway Design Completion $ 515,000 $ 515,000 R11 Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation $ 546,400 $ 546,400 R9 Yost Park (Tennis Court Resurface) $ 74,300 $ 74,300 R4 Yost Park (Trail, Bridge & Boardwalk Repairs) $ 80,000 $ 80,000 R6 Yost Park (Playground Replacement - Inclusive) $ 750,000 $ 750,000 R10 lSignage and Wayfinding $ 75,000 $ 75,000 R17 ICitywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,700,000 (C) TOTAL PARKS REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures $ 1,150,600 $ 2,266,000 $ 1,186,400 $ 882,200 $ 1,482,900 $ 734,070 $ 7,702,170 REET II(Fund 125)Revenue 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 9,500,000 (D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 9,500,000 REET II (Fund 125) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,222,000 $ 2,071,400 $ 1,305,400 $ 1,619,000 $ 2,236,800 $ 2,253,900 (D) Revenue $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 (C) Expenditures $ 1,150,600 $ 2,266,000 $ 1,186,400 $ 882,200 $ 1,482,900 $ 734,070 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 2,071,400 $ 1,305,400 $ 1,619,000 $ 2,236,800 $ 2,253,900 $ 3,019,830 *Project added via Council amendment in 2023 Page 41 Packet Pg. 474 REET I Fund 126 10.4.b Costs inflated at 3% per year REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Al Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Acquisition) $ - A5 Interurban Trail (Expansion/Acquisition) $ 895,585 $ 895,585 A2 Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Acquisition) $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 A3 Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Acquisition) $ 1,545,000 $ 1,545,000 A4 Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Acquisition) $ 2,185,500 $ 2,185,500 6C) Land Acquisition Services $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures $ 1,550,000 $ 1,595,000 $ 2,235,500 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 945,585 $ 6,426,085 REET I(Fund 126)Revenue 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,000 (D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,000 REET I (Fund 126) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 872,136 $ (477,864) $ (1,872,864) $ (3,908,364) $ (3,758,364) $ (3,608,364) (D) Revenue $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 (C) Expenditures $ 1,550,000 $ 1,595,000 $ 2,235,500 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 945,585 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ (477,864) $ (1,872,864) $ (3,908,364) $ (3,758,364) $ (3,608,364) $ (4,353,949) 08 C O IL O N r u_ .Q O U rn N O N I* N O N N O O M O L a H u_ a u_ U a v N Y i a N O N N C N E t 0 O r r Q r-� C N E L V Page 42 Packet Pg. 475 CEMETERY Trust Fund 137 1O.4.b Costs inflated at 3% per year CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total D8 lColumbariurn Expansion -Phase II $ 159,100 $ 159,100 Repair & Maintenance $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 125,000 (C) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust(Fund 137) Expenditures $ 25,000 $ 184,100 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 284,100 CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Investment Interest (@5%) $ 62,673 $ 65,306 $ 60,117 $ 62,623 $ 65,254 $ 68,016 $ 315,972 F I Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Sales Revenue $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 90,000 (D) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue $ 77,673 $ 80,306 $ 75,117 $ 77,623 $ 80,254 $ 83,016 $ 405,972 CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) 6-Year Overview 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,253,456 $ 1,306,129 $ 1,202,335 $ 1,252,452 $ 1,305,075 $ 1,360,328 (D)Revenue $ 77,673 $ 80,306 $ 75,117 $ 77,623 $ 80,254 $ 83,016 (C)Expenditures $ 25,000 $ 184,100 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 1,306,129 $ 1,202,335 $ 1,252,452 $ 1,305,075 $ 1,360,328 $ 1,418,345 Page 43 Packet Pg. 476 TREE Fund 143 10.4.b Costs inflated at 3% per year TREE (Fund 143)Expenditures 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Park and Open Space Acquisition Program $ Tree Maintenance - Oak Tree's 5th & Main* $ (C) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Expenditures $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - TREE (Fund 143)Revenue 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Tree - Fund 143 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 1,290,000 (D) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Revenue $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 1,290,000 TREE (Fund 143) 6-Year Overview 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 426,065 $ 641,065 $ 856,065 $ 1,071,065 $ 1,286,065 $ 1,501,065 (D) Revenue $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 (C) Expenditures $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 641,065 $ 856,065 $ 1,071,065 $ 1,286,065 $ 1,501,065 $ 1,716,065 *Added via Council Budget Amendment Dec. 2022 Page 44 Packet Pg. 477 10.4.b CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029) PROJECTS ADDED Type I PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION None CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029) PROJECTS REMOVED Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION Parks Lake Ballinger Access (McAleer) Project completion scheduled in 2023 Parks Johnson Property Demolition Demolition to be complete in 2023 Parks Playground Upgrade Program Playground upgrades identified each year, no need for additional program CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029) Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE Parks Columbarium Expansion - Phase II Funded through Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - scheduled in 2025 vs. 24 Parks Elm Street Park Improvements Separated into planning in 2027 and construction in 2028 vs. 2026 Parks Interurban Trail Expansion Moved to 2029 vs. 28 Parks Johnson Property Master Plan Removed demolition, master plan scheduled in 2026 vs. 25 Parks ILake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA ILA completed in 2023; payment due upon construction completion in 2024, carryforward Parks Maplewood Hill Park Playground replacement moved to 2027 vs. 25, significant price increase Parks Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements permanent restroom installation scheduled to take place in 2024, carryforward Parks Neighborhood Park SE1, SR99, SE2 X Master plan and construction of all three parks pushed back one year (must acquire first) Parks Olympic Beach Park Improvements Separated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24 Parks Parkland Acquisition/Neighborhood Parks X All three bumped back one year to 2024, 2025 and 2026 Parks Pine Street Park Improvements Separated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24 Parks Seaview Park Improvements Restroom replacement moved to 2028 vs. 27 Parks Shell Creek Restoration Plan carried forward to 2024; restoration in 2025 vs. 24 Parks Signage and Wayfinding Price increase to $75K vs. $51,500 Parks Yost Park & Pool Improvements I Playground replacement moved to 2025 vs. 23, significant price increase due to topography Page 45 Packet Pg. 478 10.4. c Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) City Council— October 3, 2023 06 ivogbk �y0p EDj,' Packet Pg. 479 10.4. c CIP 6-year maintenance 6-year capital projects w/fundin projects w/ sources funding sources OComponents found only in the CIP OComponents found only in the CFP O Components found in both the CIP & CFP CFP Long-range (20-year) capital project needs Packet Pg. 480 10.4. c Public Works & Utilities 2024-2029 CFP Combined CFP & CIP Document • Transportation • Utilities • Water • Stormwater • Sewer • Facilities • Wastewater Treatment Plant • Comparison to previous year 06 a U f� U- w .Q U M N O N NT N N d N 0 CL 0 L a 3 Packet Pg. 481 10.4. c Public Works & Utilities CFP & CIP Citywide Project Maps PWW-09 P' 1 PWT-68 PWT-17 P'A'T 24 -05 IT 44 PWT03 PWT 4G do[ 06 a a� U f� LL fC U 0) N O N N O N d N O O_ O L a 0 m _ d y i a L O V a M 2 C d Packet Pg. 482 Cd _ a m CFP & CIP Format U- oject List Capital 2024 Bu CL Pro Facilities Decision Pa Budget Nu Project Numb Amount � N N N PROJECT�' 1- 1 1 1 1 1 TOTALO (2024-2029) 1 1 • N Iv N Preservation / Maintenance Projects O c L PWT-01 Annual Street Preservation $1,600,000 $2,400,000 $1,300,000 $2,630,000 $2.630,000 $2,630,000 $13,190,000 $39,450,000 $52,64 a 10 Program = PWT-03 76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0 ° $2 10 St. SW to Olympic View Dr. = PWT-04 Alain St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to $789,553 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $789,553 $0 y $78 ` 3 gth Ave. a PWT-05 Puget Dr. / OVD Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $496,000 $0 $586,000 $0 $58 L 0 PWT-06 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave / $0 $0 $0 $165,000 $773,000 $0 $938,000 $0 O $93 10 2 238th St. SW PWT-07 Main St. / 3rd Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,000 $383,000 $493,000 $0 $49 a 0 PWT-61 Olympic View Dr Overlay - 196th / $0 $200,000 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $1,50 5 10 SR-524 to Talbot Rd PWT-68 88th Ave Overlay and Sidewalk $150,000 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $1,50 0 Repair IYa Safety / Capacity Analysis Q a� s 5 U Q Packet Pg. 483 10.4. c Public Works & Utilities CFP & CIP Project Sheets Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets Mamtains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital investment to rebuild City steels. 0mgn 5350,000 SI50,000 5150.000 5130,000 5330,000 5130p00 51.950,000 mgbt of way Conitruttpn S1,a5a,000 52,250,00a 51,150000 52,SOD,000 52,SOD,00a 52,50apW 53],500,00a Earenae Teml Sa,Em.00a $irk00.Uaa St,3mPaa S2,63Q111110 $2,53a111100 S2faap0o S3%MDM street Fnmd 132 -GES tat & bUti mt, Fund 125 S1100,000 51150,00(1 565b" 5>50,000 S150.— 5—00a S31.250,000 0.Fe*Fund L6 $&10,000 $)50,000 5650,000 51.000 St50,000 `v)50,000 531.250.000 mnsportatbn �mpaa Fels Ge— Fund stormuvter u01Ry Flmtl A22 Federal Grants state Grains umecved FUMing 590a,00a 51.130,000 51.13a.00a 51,330,0oa 516.950,000 f—din9 aewce Ural S1,500,000 S2,a0o,000 $1300,000 S2530,000 S2.M.000 $2,630,OW S39,a50,OW Parks & Recreation Lake Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA —D19 v lake Ballinger Park, City of Mountlake Terrace Project Summary: Through an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mountlake Terrace, the City of Edmonds will support the Construction of the planned improvements in the northwest area of Lake Ballinger Park including a park entry, pathways and access toLake Ballinger. The project is underway and payment is due upon completion of the projeR. Project Justification: This western boundary of the park is Edmonds dry limits and these improvements will provide better access to Lake Ballinger Park for Edmonds residents. The revenue contribution supports me construction of the improvements which will benefit the City of Edmonds. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan including 3 Recommendations. 1 Goal and 3 Objectives. Recommendation 12 Expand partnerships and agreements wah other nearby jurisdictions. Recommendation 3.6 Explore optransfor access to Lake Ballinger with the Crty of Mountlake Terrace to include possible joint development and Consideration of o fishing pier. Recommendation 52 Repair and imprave or extend trails and boardwalks to allow improved public access to natural arepsfar narure/wildlrfe viewing, hiking and outdoor experience. PROS Goal 3, Objec —3.2, 3.6 and 3.11. Estimated Cost: $200,000 Construction pal —RA S200.000 5200,000 Tool Fs�vc $200,000 $200.000 Real Ertate Excise Tax ll - Fund 125 5200,000 5200,000 Total Revenue $200,000 $200= It W 06 a Packet Pg. 484 2024 Public Works Comprehensive Plan Updates Transportation & Stormwater/Surface Water FEHR') PEERS STORM AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT o s COMPREHENSIVE PLAN City of Edmonds of E�Mo�Q Inc. 1890 City of Edmonds Public Works Department/Engineering Division Approved by City Council on July 6, 2010 October 2010 I Is WORK IN PROGRESS 06 a U f� U- U Cn N O N IT N 0 N In 0 a 0 a Packet Pg. 485 10.4. c Public Works & Utilities —Transportation 2024 Pavement Preservation Projects • 2024 Pavement Preservation Program ($1.5M) • Construction - 6 Lane Miles • 2025 Pavement Preservation Program ($100K) • Design 2024; Construction 2025 • Main St. Overlay 6t" Ave — 8t" Ave ($790k) • 2024 Construction • $750K Federal Grant • 11 New ADA Ramps • 88tn Ave Overlay &Sidewalk Repair ($150K) • Design 2024 • 76th Ave Overlay Close-out ($20k) 06 a U f� LL fC Cn U N O N NT N O N 0 CL 0 a K Packet Pg. 486 10.4. c Public Works &Utilities—Trancnnrtatinn 2024 Safety &Capacity Projects • Hwy 99 Revitalization/Gateway ($114K) • Hwy 99 Stage 3 2441"St-238t"St ($1.2M) • Hwy 99 Stage 4 224thSt-220t"St ($1.2M) • 76th Ave/220th St Intersection ($650K) • SR-104 Adaptive System ($186K) • Traffic Signal Upgrades ($30K) 06 a M U. C. M N O N N 0 N d N 0 CL 0 a -:L E Packet Pg. 487 10.4. c a Public Works Utilities —Transportation U_ 2024 Active Transportation Projects & Planning - U ., M • Transportation Plan Update($236K) CD _ � N -' O • Citywide Bicycle Improvements($15K) • Elm Way Walkway($10K) a • Traffic Calming Program($100K) • Pedestrian Safety Program ($80K)a. y o Packet Pg. 488 10.4. c Public Works & Utilities — Utilities 2024 Water Utility • 2024 Replacement Program ($3.3M) • Construction 2024 • 41000 ft of Watermain Replacement • 2025 Replacement Program ($426K) • Design 2024; Construction 2025 • Yost & Seaview Reservoir Final Design ($850K) • $3.5M-$4M rehabilitation cost for each Reservoir • 2025-26 Construction • Waterline Overlays ($225K) o..` y 06 a U f� LL fC U M N O N NT N N d 0 CL 0 a : L1 Packet Pg. 489 10.4. c Public Works & Utilities — Utilities 2024 Stormwater Utility • Storm &Surface Water Comp Plan ($350K) • Perrinville Creek Basin Projects • Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration ($275K) • Perrinville Creek Flow Mgmt ($100K) • Perrinville Creek Basin Update ($594K) • Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Impr ($90K) • Lake Ballinger Floodplain Purchase ($120K) • 2024 Replacement Program ($1.3M) • Stormwater Overlays ($315K) • 2025 Replacement Program ($324K) 06 a U f� LL f� r .Q U rn N O N N O N O Q 0 a am Packet Pg. 490 10.4. c Public Works & Utilities — Utilities 2024 Sewer Utility • 2024 Replacement Program($2.01VI) • 800 ft of Sewerline Replacement • 2025 Replacement Program($363K) • Cured in -place pipe rehabilitation ($522K) • 41000 ft of sewer CIPP rehab • Sewerline Overlays($60K) 2024 WWTP • WWTP Annual Capital Replace ment($500K) • Carbon Recovery Project($500K) • Nutrient Removal Project($350K) • Gasification Bypass($300K) • Condition Assessment ($150K) • Variable Frequency Drives(VFD) Upgrades ($250K) • Primary Clarifier 2 Rehabilitation ($600K) 06 a U f� LL U M N 0 N N O N 0 0 CL 0 a 13 Packet Pg. 491 10.4.c Public Works & Utilities — Facilities • Boys & Girls Club • Cemetery Building • Historic Museum • Library • City Hall • Meadowdale Club House • Fishing Pier • Old Public Works • Frances Anderson Center • Parks Maintenance Bldg • Fire Station 16 • Fire Station 17 • Fire Station 20 • Historic Log Cabin • Public Safety • Public Works O&M • Wade James Theater • Yost Pool House 06 c a m .Q U rn N � O N U� O N d o L a c pi M a O a ch �o w N 14 E Q Packet Pg. 492 10.4. c -ured Funding $862,240 4% bond $585,000 3% )ortation Impact Fees $423,361 2% 112 $251,570 1.1% =unds $114,000 0.5% General Fund 0.4% City of Lynnwood Other Packet Pg. 493 10.4. c 06 a a� ,550 4% U General Fund LL Fund112 w a Other 0.3% ARPA v City of Lynnwood N i Other N IT N O N Facilities 016 bond/non-bond $2,013,645 0.7% N 0 CL 0 Transportation Impact Fees $1,923,065 1% a Packet Pg. 494 10.4. c CIP/CFP Schedule July • City staff begins development of capital budgets August • Submit proposed Capital budget to Finance • Prepare draft CFP and CIP September • Joint Presentation City Council/Planning Board (September 19tn) • Planning Board Public Hearing (September 27tn) October • City Council Public Hearing (October 3rd) • Planning Board Recommendations/Approval (October 11tn) • City Council Discussion (October 17th) • City Council Discussion/Approval (October 24tn) \• -Ia•-I • Adopt CFP w/ Budget into the Comprehensive Plan (November 21st) 06 a a� U f� LL fC w .Q U M N O N IT N O N W In 0 CL 0 L a 17 Packet Pg. 495 10.4. c Questions 06 M 2 C d E Packet Pg. 496 10.4. d Parks, Recreation & Human Services Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP Angie Feser, Director September 27, 2023 Packet Pg. 497 10.4. d Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP Overview Framework for CIP/CFP Current/Ongoing Projects Capital Projects — 2024 Highlighted Projects Programs Acquisition Changes 0 w U) IL N Y CU IL Packet Pg. 498 10.4. d 2024-2029 Parks CIP / CFP- FRAMEWORK Department Staff Resources PROS Plan Capital Recommendations 1. Acquisition to Fill Park System Gaps - Secure additional land for neighborhood parks to address gaps 2. Open Space & Conservation Acquisitions - Pursue acquisitions that adjoin city properties or conserve unique natural areas o w 3. Park Development & Enhancements — significant repairs needed for aging infrastructure 4. Yost Pool Replacement - Refine options for the replacement of Yost Pool a N 5. Trail Connections — Needed to help link destinations across the community CU 6. ADA, Accessibility & Other User Convenience Enhancements - Remove barriers and improve Z universal access of EDtiJO C1 r Packet Pg. 499 10.4. d 2024-2029 Parks CIP / CFP - FRAMEWORK PROS Plan Goals (9) 1. ENGAGEMENT- Encourage and facilitate meaningful public involvement in park and recreation planning. 2. DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION -Decrease barriers and provide increased opportunities for participation and representative cultural, heritage and art programs, events representing the diversity of Edmonds demographics. 3. PARKS, TRAILS & OPEN SPACE -Provide an interconnected park system that offers a wide variety of year-round recreation opportunities and experiences which support and enhance Edmonds' cultural identity and the natural environment. 4. WATERFRONT USE & ACCESS -Preserve and pursue opportunities to expand public access and enjoyment of Edmonds' waterfront. 5. NATURAL RESOURCE & HABITAT CONSERVATION -Conserve and provide access to natural resource lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education. _ 0 w w 4) a CO) Y L CU a Packet Pg. 500 10.4. d 2024-2029 Parks CIP / CFP FRAMEWORK PROS Plan Goals (Cont.) 6. CLIMATE CHANGE, ADAPTATION & RESILIENCY -Adopt to climate change and increase local park system resiliency by improving environmental conditions, stewardship and sustainability in parks, trails, open spaces and recreation facilities within planning, development, maintenance, and operations. 7. RECREATION PROGRAMS & FACILITIES -Provide a varied and inclusive suite of recreation opportunities and experiences to promote health and wellness, year-round activity and social engagement. 8. CULTURAL SERVICES -Provide arts and cultural opportunities and experiences to promote an engaged and vibrant community. 9. PARK OPERATIONS & ADMINISTRATION - Maintain and operate a modern, efficient park system that provides a high level of user comfort, safety and aesthetic quality, and protects capital investments. PROS Plan G2—Obj2.6 G3 — Obi 3.8, 3.10, 3.11 G7 — Obi 7.2 Rec. — 1.2, 6.2 Packet Pg. 501 10.4.d 2024 - 2029 Parks CIP / UP Geographic Distribution Ps Johnson Property R3 Meadowdale Playllelds D6 Mathay Ballinger Park 119,114 R6, RIl Yost Park & Pool D19 lake Ballinger Park (Min Da [alumharium Expan:ion - Phase ll R7 Olym plc Beach Park DSD, D11, D32 Pine street Park R. stets Park PI, D14 WMertron[ Walkway R12 Maplewood Hill Park P4, D9, DI Edmonds Marsh Restoration Di6, D17, R14 Elm street Park PI, D2 Parks M.1—nonce Building R16 Seavlew Park R35 Pool Replacement Al Edmonds Marsh Restoraion AS Interurban Troll R19 Shell Creek Restoration D20 Woodwey Campus Athletic Complex 14,"te specHic projects A2, P2, D23 Nelghborhoad Park SEI A3, P6, Dls Neighborhood Park SR99 A4, P7, D39 Neighborhood Park sE 2 R27 Cltywlde Park Improvements RIO Signege B WWfinding P4 •D1 D9 F, A2, P2, D13 A3,P6,D15 A4, P7, D18 R16 R17 �� R10 VP * Non -site specific projects Neighborhood Park SE 1 Neighborhood Park SR99 Neighborhood Park SE 2 Citywide Park Improvements Signage & Wayfinding R4 RB R11 R19 R[S • 7 R14 �R6 D10 • D12 ;' 2024 Projects • •D17 :8 I � L,-/ I?19 2025 - 2029 Projects • D6 • \ 7l6 Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not drown. Q 0 U 016 M a a) 0 LL Wr Q M U N Q N N N 0 M 0 L. a C N i a N Y a Packet Pg. 502 10.4. d Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - FORMAT Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site& Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD* D19 Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Development. Payment due upon completion of project. DS Mathay Ballinger Park *CARRYFORWARD* D6 Construction of improvements including permanent restroom, paved trail, picnic $ 271,300 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 271,300 D7 shelter ADA access and other amenities. Shell Creek Restoration *CARRYFORWARD* R19 Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based $ 120,000 $ 380,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 on study. Study in 2024, work in 2025. R9 Yost Park & Pool R4 Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include resurface of tennis courts $ 154,300 $ 1,296,400 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,450,700 R6 and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs/replacement in 2024, inclusive R11 iplaVground and pool upgrades in 2025. Columbarium Expansion - Phase II D8 Expansion ofthe current colum barium. Funding provided throughthe Cemetery $ - $ 159,100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 159,100 Trust Fund 137. Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting X D20 In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park $ _ $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and future construction of two additional fields. Neighborhood Park SE 1 X Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds $ - $ 79,600 $ 819,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 899,100 D13 (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase). Sierra Park R8 $ _ $ - $ 415,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 415,000 Playground replacement and upgradeto inclusive standards. R7 Olympic Beach Park $ - $ 20,000 $ 33,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 53,000 Renovation of existing restrooms. Ict Z C E �A of EDAf0 C1 v O t4 w v !0 a Packet Pg. 503 10.4.d Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP Funding Overview PARKS CIP REVENUE 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,000 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 9,500,000 Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,800,000 Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 215,000 $ 1,290,000 Cemetery Trust Fund 137-ColumbariumExpansion $ 159,100 $ 159,100 ARPA Contribution - Shell Creek Study $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 120,000 Investment Interest (3%) $ 18,918 $ 24,795 $ 30,849 $ 37,085 $ 43,507 $ 50,122 $ 205,277 Donations $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Bond Proceeds $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ Secured Grants $ $ $ - $ $ $ $ L(E)TOTAL Unsecured Grants/Funding- non -land acquisition $ $ 1,500,000 $ 1,945,000 $ 5,481,200 $ 869,500 $ 24,756,800 $ 34,552,500 PARKS CIP REVENUE $ 2,853,918 $ 3,898,895 $ 4,190,849 $ 7,733,285 $ 3,128,007 $ 27,021,922 $ 48,826,877 Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 (F) Beginning Fund Balance $ 3,150,795 $ 3,061,113 $ 1,316,908 $ 17,857 $ 1,214,742 $ 1,817,349 (E) Revenue $ 2,853,918 $ 3,898,895 $ 4,190,849 $ 7,733,285 $ 3,128,007 $ 27,021,922 (D) Expenditures $ 2,943,600 $ 5,643,100 $ 5,489,900 $ 6,536,400 $ 2,525,400 $ 26,559,455 (G) Ending Fund Balance (F+E-D) $ 3,061,113 $ 1,316,908 $ 17,857 $ 1,214,742 $ 1,817,349 $ 2,279,817 E Packet Pg. 504 Current/Ongoing Capital Projects )emolition m U rn N :s (2023-2024) N O N d N O 0. O L a c 0 c a� N d L a N Y L a v Packet Pg. 505 10.4. d Current/Ongoing Capital Projects , w .Q c� U 015 _ a d w Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA U- fC Parkland Acquisition Program L) N O N Deferred Maintenance/Small Capital Projects N BLN Shower replacement N Cemetery Gate repair o Mathay Ballinger Apollo Swing replacem( o Park Restroom Doors (12) — automatic Ic a; Viewer repairs OUTS I OR INSIDE IN9DE OUTSIDE In T 211/a In. ■ Ft ink i a� a -43I6In_� H2Y18 F.ti _ 0 CIO _ 4) L a Packet Pg. 506 10.4. d Parks, Recreation and Human Services Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP PROJECTS Highlight — 2024 projects Packet Pg. 507 Q PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL SERVIC. c a Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA- D19 (DP) M U- -•m— .v. irW411111111 Boardwalk & Viewing Platform Lake Ballinger t I M w .Q M U N O N N O N d N O rL O L. a c 0 • Interlocal agreement to support development PROS Plan of phase 3 which includes improved access for G3—obj. 3.2, 3.8, 3.11 y G5 — Obj 5.2 Edmonds residents Rec.— 3.6 a • Estimated Cost $200,000 (L v .r c N E t Of EDy,o V `may _ tia ca Q 4) 0 E . t V !0 a Packet Pg. 508 Mathay Ballinger Park -D6 (CarryforwardlDP) • ADA parking and paved pathway • Shelter with Picnic Tables • Permanent Restroom • Estimated Total Cost: $499,300 M U- Iq N O N d N O M O L a PROS Plan o G2- Obi 2.6 G3 - Obi 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8, 3.9 y G9- Obi 9.1 a Rec. - 3.1, 3.3, 3.5, 6.2, 6.4 Y a v c a� �A of EDMo� C1 M Inc. l_ E . t v !0 a Packet Pg. 509 10.4.d Shell Creek Restoration- x19 (Carryforward) Construction (R19) — Creek Restoration $120,000 $380,000 i $500,( Total Expenses $120,000 $380,000 $500,( Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $380,000 $380,( ARPA Funding Transfer $120,000 $120,( Total Revenue $120,000 $380,000 $500,1 • Study to determine scope & obtain permits - 2024 • Restorative work - 2025 • Estimated Cost $500,000 Q M U , c a M U- w Q M U rn N O N N O N d to O M O L a c 0 PROS Plan G3 - Obj 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 G4 - Obj 4.2, 4.4 a G5 - Obj 5. 1, 5.3, 5.4 to G6 - Obj 6.5 a G9 - Obj 9.1, 9.2 c aD E �A OF EDMo� C1 O t v !0 a Packet Pg. 510 Yost Park &Pool - R9, R41 R6, R11 (DP) Construction (R4)—Trail/Bridge Repair $80,000 $8i Construction (R6)—Playground Replacement $750,000 $75i Construction (R9)—Tennis Court Resurface $74,300 $7 Construction (R11) — Pool Upgrades $546,400 $54 Total Expenses $154,300 $1,296,400 $1,45, Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $154,300 $1,296,400 $1,45 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $154,300 $0 $1,296,400 i $1,45, • Trail / Bridge Repair— 2024 • Tennis Court Resurface — 2024 • Playground Replacement - 2025 • Pool Upgrades — 2025 • Estimated Cost: $1,450,700 PROS Plan G1 — Obj 1.1, 1.4 G3 — Obj 3.6, 3.8, 3.9 G4 — Obj. 4.4 G5— Obj 5.4 G6 — Obj 6.5 G9 — Obj. 9.1 Rec.— 3.1,3.4,3.10 Rec. — 6.2 Q M U , c a M U_ w Q M U Cn N O N Iq N O N d N O Q O a` Packet Pg. 511 10.4. d Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - PROJECTS Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site& Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD* D19 Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Development. Payment due upon completion of project. DS Mathay Ballinger Park *CARRYFORWARD* D6 Construction of improvements including permanent restroom, paved trail, picnic $ 271,300 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 271,300 D7 shelter ADA access and other amenities. Shell Creek Restoration *CARRYFORWARD* R19 Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based $ 120,000 $ 380,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500,000 on study. Study in 2024, work in 2025. R9 Yost Park & Pool R4 Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include resurface of tennis courts $ 154,300 $ 1,296,400 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,450,700 R6 and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs/replacement in 2024, inclusive R11 iplaVground and pool upgrades in 2025. Columbarium Expansion - Phase II D8 Expansion ofthe current colum barium. Funding provided throughthe Cemetery $ - $ 159,100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 159,100 Trust Fund 137. Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting X D20 In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park $ _ $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and future construction of two additional fields. Neighborhood Park SE 1 X Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds $ - $ 79,600 $ 819,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 899,100 D13 (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase). Sierra Park R8 $ _ $ - $ 415,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 415,000 Playground replacement and upgradeto inclusive standards. R7 Olympic Beach Park $ - $ 20,000 $ 33,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 53,000 Renovation of existing restrooms. Ict Z C E �A of EDAf0 C1 v O fC w v !0 a Packet Pg. 512 10.4.d Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - PROJECTS Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site & Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total D10 Pine Street Park D11 Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, $ - $ 40,000 $ 124,400 $ - $ - $ - $ 164,400 D12 canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway. Johnson Property R2 Master plan forfuture park use. Site development not included in estimate. $ - $ - $ 82,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 82,000 PS Demolition, debris removal and site security completed in 2023. Neighborhood Park SR99 • Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast $ - $ - $ 82,000 $ 844,100 $ - $ - $ 926,100 D15 Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase). X P1 Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building $ _ $ - $ 1,125,500 $ 4,637,100 $ - $ - $ 5,762,600 D2 Replace and/or renovate shop facilities located in City Park. R12 Maplewood Hill Park $ _ $ _ $ - $ 347,800 $ - $ - $ 347,800 Playground replacement. Neighborhood Park SE 2 X D18 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast $ - $ - $ - $ 84,400 $ 869,500 $ - $ 953,900 Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase). Waterfront Walkway P3 Connectingthe waterfront walkwayfrom Brackett's Landing North to $ $ $ $ 515,000 $ 819,500 $ 1,334,500 D14 Marina Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide - _ _ S _ Condominiums, to provide ADA improvements. R16 Seaview Park $ - $ - $ - S - $ 417,900 $ - $ 417,900 Replacement of permanent restroom to provide ADA upgrades. D16 Elm Street Park D17 Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, $ - $ - $ - S - $ 100,000 $ 340,370 $ 440,370 R14 small shelter with picnic tables and habitat restoration. Packet Pg. 513 10.4.d Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP - PROJECTS Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site & Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Pool Replacement X R15 $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ - $23,881,000 $ 23,881,000 Replacement ofthe existing Yost pool. Design, location, and funding TBD. Meadowdale Playfields R3 Renovations as suggested by the City of Lynnwood and consistent with re- TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD $ negotiated and updated Interlocal Agreement. May include addition of dugout - roofs, light replacement and playground upgrade. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Master Plan development and implementation of the Edmonds Marsh to daylight P4 the waterway connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and two fresh X D9 water creeks providing restoration of fresh water/salt water estuary and natural TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD $ - D1 tidal exchange. (All expenses are TBD per Council direction in December 2022). Acquisition funding identified in Parkland Acquisition program. (A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS 1 $ 745,600 $ 3,475,100 $ 2,6874 00 $ 5,913,400 $ 1,902,400 $ 25,0 00,870 $ 33,070,070 Packet Pg. 514 10.4. d Parks, Recreation and Human Services Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP PROGRAMS Highlight — 2024 projects Packet Pg. 515 10.4.d Signage & Wayfinding - R10 (DP) >_ O Trail identification, orientation markers, safety & regulatory messagin CU park hours, park rules and etiquette, interpretive information and N warning signs. a Estimated Cost: $75,000 PROS Plan L G2 — Obj. 2.1, 2.3 CU G3 — Obj. 3.6 a ' G5 — Obj. 5.3, 5.4 PARK HOURS-. MAW G9 — Obj. 9.1 Rec. — 6.2, 6.5 DUSKto Port Security 425 508-71 E V !0 a Packet Pg. 516 Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP - PROGRAMS Costs inflated at 3% per year Project (4) Programs PARKS CIP PROGRAMS 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total R17 Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular and deferred maintenance, repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment. $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,700,000 signage m waynnamg R10 Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system. Parkland Acquisition Support Funds utilized to evaluate potential acquisitions and complete due diligence. Debt Service and Interfund Transfers Debt service on Civic Park $1.61M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to Engineering for Capital Project Support. I SUBTOTAL- PARKS CIP PROGRAMS $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ 75,000 5 50,000 $ 50,000 5 50,000 5 .50,000 $ 50,000 5 50,000 $ 300,000 $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 1 $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 1 $ 738,000 Q M U c a W a) M ILL rr .Q M U rn N O N N O N d fn 0 CL 0 L. a c 0 c a� to d s_ a to Y s_ ftis a Packet Pg. 517 10.4.d Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - PROGRAMS Costs inflated at 3% per year Project � PARKS CIP PROGRAMS 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program R17 Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular and deferred maintenance, $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,700,000 repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment. Signage & Wayfinding R10 Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 75,000 consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system. Parkland Acquisition Support $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 300,000 Funds utilized to evaluate potential acquisitions and complete due diligence. Debt Service and Interfund Transfers Debt service on Civic Park $1.61M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 123,000 $ 738,000 Engineering for Capital Project Support. (B)SUBTOTAL- PARKS CIP PROGRAMS $ 698,000 $ 623,000 $ 623,000 $ 623,000 $ 6237000 $ 623,000 $ 3,813,000 (4) Programs 1 S9O Packet Pg. 518 10.4. d Parks, Recreation and Human Services Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP PARKLAND ACQUISITIONS Highlight — 2024 project Packet Pg. 519 10.4.d Parkland Acquisition - a2, A3, A4 (No DP -Council Authorization) Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (A2) .. $1,500,000 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Acquisition —Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3) Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4) Total Expenses $1,500,000 Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $1,300,000 Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD Total Revenue $1,300,000 • Neighborhood Parks SE1 • Acquisition as Feasible • Estimated Cost: $1,500,00 N Y i PROS Plan a G2 — Obj. 2.1 G3 — Obj. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3A Rec. —1.1 E v o a c a� I � . �a a Packet Pg. 520 10.4.d Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP Costs inflated at 3% per year Project tf PARKLAND ACQUISITION 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total X A2 Neighborhood Park SE 1 $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds. X A3 Neighborhood Park SR99 $ - $ 1,545,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,545,000 Acquisition of parkland near SR 99. X A4 Neighborhood Park SE 2 $ - $ - $ 2,185,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,185,500 Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds. AS Interurban Trail $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 895,585 $ 895,585 Acquisition for trail extension. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) X Al Acquisition ofthe Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh TBD TED TED TED TED TED $ - restoration. (C)SUBTOTAL- PARKLAND ACQUISITION $ 1,500,000 $ 1,545,000 $ 2,185,500 $ $ $ 895,585 $ 6,126,085 1 S9O Packet Pg. 521 10.4.d Changes to CIP/CFP UP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029) PROJECTS ADDED Type PROJECT NAME CFP r DESCRIPTION None UP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029) PROJECTS REMOVED Type PROJECT NAME CFP I DESCRIPTION Parks Lake Ballinger Access (McAleer) Project completion scheduled in 2023 Parks Johnson Property Demolition Demolition to be complete in 2023 Parks Playground Upgrade Program IPlayground upgrades identified each year, no need for additional program UP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029) Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE Parks Columbarium Expansion - Phase II Funded through Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - scheduled in 2025 vs. 24 Parks Elm Street Park Improvements Separated into planning in 2027 and construction in 2028 vs. 2026 Parks Interurban Trail Expansion Moved to 2029 vs. 28 Parks Johnson Property Master Plan Removed demolition, master plan scheduled in 2026 vs. 25 Parks Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA ILA completed in 2023; payment due upon construction completion in 2024, carryforward Parks Maplewood Hill Park Playground replacement moved to 2027 vs. 25, significant price increase Parks Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements permanent restroom installation scheduled to take place in 2024, carr forward Parks Neighborhood Park SE1, SR99, SE2 X Master plan and construction of all three parks pushed back one year must acquire first Parks Olympic Beach Park Improvements Se arated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24 Parks Parkland Acquisition/Neighborhood Parks X All three bumped back one year to 2024, 2025 and 2026 Parks Pine Street Park Improvements Separated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24 Parks Seaview Park Improvements Restroom replacement moved to 2028 vs. 27 Parks Shell Creek Restoration IPlayground Plan carried forward to 2024, restoration in 2025 vs. 24 Parks Si na e and Wayfinding Price increase to $75K vs. $51,500 Parks Yost Park & Pool Improvements replacement moved to 2025 vs. 23, significant price increase due to topography Packet Pg. 522 10.4. d Questions? Packet Pg. 523 10.4. d Parks, Recreation & Human Services Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP Angie Feser, Director October 3, 2023 Packet Pg. 524 10.4.e CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Hybrid Meeting September 27, 2023 Chair Gladstone called the hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. at Edmonds City Hall and on Zoom. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES The Land Acknowledgement was read by Board Member Maxwell. Board Members Present Judi Gladstone, Chair Lauren Golembiewski Richard Kuehn (online) Susanna Martini Nick Maxwell Jeremy Mitchell Beth Tragus-Campbell, Vice Chair Board Members Absent Emily Nutsch (alternate) Lily Distelhorst (student) - excused Staff Present Mike Clugston, Senior Planner Rob English, City Engineer Mike De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Director Shannon Burley, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Deputy Director READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MARTINI, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 13. MOTION MADE BY CHAIR GLADSTONE, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS. • On page 3 of 9 of the minutes, in the second full paragraph, the second sentence should be corrected to: Replacement trees wou could be triggered when the property owner has the last two or three trees on the property. • Page 3 of 9, the fourth full paragraph, delete the third sentence starting with, "Chair Gladstone. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENTS. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 27, 2023 Page 1 of 7 Packet Pg. 525 10.4.e THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Sue Oskowski, Edmonds resident, asked why the sidewalk on 84ffi (from 238t' to 234tb) in the Public Works planned schedule for 2027. When Public Works presented their transportation plan to the City Council in June of this year the sidewalk was scheduled to be built in 2024. Her neighbor drives an electric wheelchair in the road because there are no sidewalks on 84th. She urged the City to put that section of the sidewalk in the plan for 2024. It is definitely needed now. Teresa Hollis, Edmonds resident, had the following comments for Public Works: 1. She stated that this plan uses priorities for walkways that were set in 2015 which is before the City Council decided to put almost all of the new housing growth in the Highway 99 subarea. This CFP mostly ignores the planning decisions that were made by the City Council about where future density would be. She requested that in future cycles staff pays attention to where the housing density is planned. 2. She referred to the EIS for the Highway 99 subarea plan which says to build flexibility into each cycle of the 6-year Transportation Improvement Program to modify the priority and the funding of capital projects serving the study area as new development occurs and creates opportunities for matching funds from private development. A building permit was issued for the Apollo apartments at 236th and Highway 99. It's waiting for the developer to pick it up and pay the big fees. So where are the city infrastructure projects for that neighborhood? 3. She said she doesn't support the amount of spending in the Green Streets demonstration project. A Green Street is a Tesla, but they would be happy with a used Prius. She suggested the City just provide some sort of walkway so they don't have to walk in the street, especially when they walk their kids to school. Also, please add a project for a paved walkway on 236th between 84th and Edmonds Way since that's a route to Madrona School. It would also support the neighborhood where development will eventually happen on the empty lot at 236th and 80. 4. She expressed support for the big increase in traffic calming programs for 2024. She had the following comments for Parks: 1. She supports the emphasis on working down the maintenance and repair backlog. 2. She expressed concern that the Burlington Coat Factory site project is missing from the portfolio. She wondered why there wasn't at least a placeholder for it in this CFP` cycle for some reasonable estimate of the city spending. Angela Winzen, Mayor's Climate Protection Committee member and Edmonds Climate Advisory Board member, commented on behalf of both of the groups to convey their shared desire for a climate action manager to be part of the City's new budget. Climate mitigation is not a task that should be on a list of many others. It deserves, at minimum, a dedicated individual who can take the lead on implementation of the 2023 Climate Action Plan and the writing of future plans, including adaptation plans and all business related to climate mitigation in the City of Edmonds. Edmonds needs a leader in the city office who is able to focus their efforts entirely on the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. They cannot wait another 13 years to begin when they are already years behind. A climate action manager for this city is long overdue and needs to be part of the new budget. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 27, 2023 Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 526 10.4.e None PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Public Hearing City Engineer Rob English introduced staff members and explained the difference between the CFP and the CIP and how they have been combined into one document. He highlighted the project lists and explained the way they are prioritized and organized. He also reviewed the layout of the project sheets. He explained that the Transportation Plan Update will be coordinated with the Comprehensive Plan Update. The Storm and Surface Water Management Comprehensive Plan is just beginning an update. Chair Gladstone asked for confirmation that the priorities established in the CIP are based on the 2015 Plan. Mr. English confirmed that is true. Mr. English reviewed Pavement Preservation Projects, Safety and Capacity Projects, Active Transportation Projects and Planning, Water Utility Projects, and Stormwater Projects. There was discussion about waterline overlays and patches. Staff explained the importance of coordinating between departments to determine the prioritization of projects. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell asked if the City is on track for water utility replacement. Mr. English replied that they are. The utility rate analysis currently underway will reassess the utility rates that are needed to maintain the city's infrastructure. Mr. English continued to review 2024 projects and programs including the Stormwater Utility, Sewer Utility Projects, Wastewater Treatment Plant, and Facilities. Comments/Questions: Board Member Golembiewski asked how coordination happens with other agencies if it is a road that has other ownership. Mr. English explained it depends on the project and gave some examples. Sometimes there are joint projects where jurisdictions share costs. Highway 99 is a state route. The state's responsibility on a state route is the pavement condition. The local agencies are responsible for any improvements. Sometimes there are state dollars available for this too. Board Member Mitchell asked if the estimated project cost is an engineer's ROM (rough order of magnitude) type estimate from a cost consultant. Mr. English replied that it is. When the Comprehensive Plan updates are done there is typically a high-level engineer's estimate attached to each project. Board Member Mitchell asked how many projects end up with leftover contingency funds and what happens with leftover funds. Mr. English said it depends on the scope of the project. Mr. English explained that complex projects tend to use more of the contingency funds, while the pavement preservation program rarely touches the contingency fund. If it is a local funding source like REET, the money gets put back into the fund and is part of the balance available for subsequent year projects. Board Member Golembiewski asked how private development influences prioritization of projects, particularly transportation and sidewalk projects. For example, there could be an area where they want to encourage development and the City takes the lead in doing some frontage work or an area that has some developable, Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 27, 2023 Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 527 10.4.e attractive land where they want the developer to do some of those sidewalk projects. Does that lead into the City's decision making and prioritization? Mr. English affirmed that it can. He referred to Highway 99 as an example of a high priority investment area by the current administration. On that corridor, projects will be done to beautify the corridor as well as subsequent frontage improvements that would typically be required by a developer. These improvements save costs for the developers and help to spur redevelopment. Chair Gladstone noted that the CIP is based on the 2015 Transportation Plan and asked how the prioritization of the CIP is impacted by the passage of the subarea plan. Was that evaluated and incorporated at all? Mr. English noted they will have an opportunity to do that with the current update. At the planning level, they go through the Transportation Plan each six years, and this is the big effort to look at overall planning and tie that into the Comprehensive Plan. Chair Gladstone asked if the Transportation Plan will come to the Planning Board. Mr. English replied that it would. Chair Gladstone said it didn't seem like there weren't really any new sidewalks before 2027. Why is that? Mr. English said there is no funding. The first three years are projects that have secured money or are reasonably expected to have secured money. There is no dedicated funding for sidewalks. Chair Gladstone asked what the replacement rate is for replacing the utility system with the dollar amounts that are in the budget for replacement. Mr. De Lilla replied it would be about 100 years. Mr. English commented that for transportation, at a rate of $2.8 million per year they could repave the streets in 25 to 30 years. The City is only currently funding about half that amount. He explained that traffic impact fees are restricted to growth related projects that address level of service. With this update they will be changing the way they do impact fees by looking at a multimodal level of service. Part of that will be looking at sidewalks and bike lanes in an effort to have a more holistic complete street approach. Board Member Mitchell referred to areas that don't have sidewalks and asked about the possibility of taking away some of the right-of-way that the City owns to incorporate some pedestrian right of way. Mr. English noted that a local impact district would be one way to fund a sidewalk on a local street if all the neighbors agreed to it. Board Member Mitchell explained that the City of Shoreline sometimes will put in temporary delineator curbs into the right of way. This is a way to provide a community that doesn't have any sidewalks with a designated area while funding for sidewalks is being generated. Mr. English said they don't have any active programs like this. They are already $1.3 million short on paving, so to pave something like that takes them further away from preservation efforts. He noted that there have been occasions where they have a wider shoulder and have striped it in a way so that pedestrians could walk there. However, they don't have an active program where they go look for wider shoulders to make a temporary path. Chair Gladstone asked if this could potentially be a temporary solution for the area on 236t' brought up by a resident today that had no place for school kids to walk, not even a shoulder. Mr. English expressed concern that it could trigger stormwater requirements related to detention and water quality. They typically look for opportunities where there is existing pavement to maintain what they have so they don't have the stormwater triggers. Director Feser suggested that some of these ideas might be able to be addressed with the new Transportation Improvement Plan's multimodal transportation focus. Mr. England concurred. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell referred to packet page 154 and stated that they need to figure out how to prevent the massive block of sidewalk projects continuing to be pushed out because of lack of funding. She asked why parks restrooms maintenance funding had been removed. Director Feser stated that might just be a facilities budget issue. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell asked staff to provide clarification on that. Director Feser noted that there is a $450,000 program for projects like that. They are still doing the restroom projects; it just isn't under the facilities budget. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 27, 2023 Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 528 10.4.e Director Feser presented the Parks, Recreation, and Human Services 2024-2029 CIP/CFP. She introduced Deputy Director Shannon Burley and expressed appreciation for the large role she plays in the budget process. She also thanked Public Works and Rob English for working with them. She presented the framework for the CIP/CFP; current and ongoing projects; capital projects (2024 highlighted projects, programs, and acquisitions); and a summary of changes in the program from last year's capital program. Public Testimony: None Questions/Comments: Board Member Martini referred to signage and wayfinding and encouraged the City to include accessibility Director Feser concurred and stated they intend to do that. Board Member Golembiewski asked if Parks is responsible for the maintenance of all street trees. Director Feser replied that they are, and it is a challenge. They need to do an inventory of all trees so they know what they have and how they are working with it. Chair Gladstone referred to parkland acquisition and asked what the minimum size is for a neighborhood park. Director Feser replied that there is no minimum or maximum; it is more about the location and what it provides. Board Member Martini referred to the waterfront walkway and asked if the apartments agreed with the City to finally put in an accessible walkway. Director Feser explained they had not, but the courts said yes. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell referred to the ADA restroom upgrade at Seaview Park and asked if they could use REET funding for that one since they are increasing access. Director Feser said they could use REET funding, but that doesn't have to do with increasing access. She didn't think they could use park impact fees because it isn't about increasing capacity. Board Member Martini argued that it would increase capacity for her. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell encouraged staff to move this project up earlier with the justification that they can't fully utilize the existing structure they have built and paid for because it doesn't have an ADA restroom. Director Feser asked for suggestions about what in exchange could get pushed back. Vice Chair Tragus- Campbell suggested pushing back the Maplewood Hill Park playground replacement one year because then you are swapping playground for playground and increasing access to the playground you have. Board Member Golembiewski pointed out that Sierra Park desperately needs to be replaced. As far as neighborhood concerns, Seaview has access to Seaview Park so they aren't lacking a park space. This could be another potential swap. Chair Gladstone asked if there are any concerns about recommending the CIP for approval to the Council. She stated that the Council needs to understand that the way that this CIP is set up perpetuates the inequities in the city. She appreciates the philosophy that the priority is that they need to maintain what they have before they put new things in, but if the Council wants to walk the walk about leveling the playing field here. There is some real hard thinking they need to do. She understands that there are funding issues, but how you direct your REET dollars is somewhat discretionary. She is unhappy that they are not seeing any new sidewalks until 2027 when they have kids walking down a street where there is no place to walk. There are people using wheelchairs on an arterial that is becoming busier by the day, and it is not being addressed. That overall philosophy flies in the face what Council has been talking about in terms of trying to address some of the inequities in the City. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 27, 2023 Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 529 10.4.e Board Member Golembiewski asked if there is a breakdown of the amount of money being spent on maintenance of existing facilities versus money towards new facilities each year. She also commented that it appears that a large chunk of the improvement funds toward new items are being dedicated towards the Highway 99 revitalization stages 3 and 4, and that maybe some of the smaller neighborhood sidewalks and streets are getting pushed out further to prioritize this area. She acknowledged that Highway 99 is underserved so they are putting funds there, but maybe those aren't the streets that the community is actually wanting to improve. Maybe the issue with prioritization isn't necessarily between maintenance of existing and development of new. In 2024 and 2025 it appears that most of the capital facilities budget is going toward Highway 99. Maybe if some of those funds were diverted towards areas like 84t' or 236`l' off the main arterial, you would have more support. Chair Gladstone said in her mind it isn't an "either/or" issue; it's probably an "and". Mr. English noted that the majority of the funding for Highway 99 is grant funding so they can't move it to local streets. He acknowledged that it is a complex issue. Board Member Golembiewski agreed and spoke to the importance of communicating that sort of thing well. The neighborhoods around there don't understand these issues. Chair Gladstone reiterated that it's more about the REET dollars and impact fees and where they are used. Board Member Golembiewski recommended highlighting to Council the way impact fees for the transportation program can be used is going to change. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell said she would be comfortable recommending support of this with the caveat that the City Council needs to find additional funds to get at least one of those sidewalk projects done every year because it's important to the community. Board Member Mitchell spoke in support of the Green Streets program but suggested taking some of the funding and first putting it towards sidewalks or at least delineating walkways to give these communities a safe walking space. After those needs are met there might be more support from the community for the program. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell said she also supports the Green Streets program but is concerned about the safety of people walking or riding their bikes down the street. She is very pleased about the traffic calming program in the plan because people are going down streets way too fast, especially with the growing population. Having calming measures, sidewalks, and bike lanes to make it safer outside of the bowl areas is something she would recommend. Chair Gladstone suggested a couple board members could work on a draft memo to be reviewed by the Planning Board at the October 11 meeting. Director Feser noted that the memo would need to be ready to go into the Council packet on October 12. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THAT A SMALL GROUP PREPARE A DRAFT MEMO. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Chair Gladstone and Board Member Mitchell volunteered to work on the memo. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 27, 2023 Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 530 10.4.e NEW BUSINESS None PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA Senior Planner Clugston noted he would be on vacation from October 6 through October 15. Michelle Martin is also on leave right now, so logistically it will be difficult to get things done. He pointed out that the Tree Code was already bumped to October 11. Tonight, the Board added the discussion regarding the CIP/CFP memo to that meeting as well. Director McLaughlin was going to be at the October 11 meeting to talk about the Comprehensive Plan, Highway 99 Community Renewal Program Update, and the Highway 99 Landmark Site Discussion. Chair Gladstone noted they also need to have the discussion about the vision statement. Mr. Clugston indicated that would be part of the Comprehensive Plan discussion on October 11. Chair Gladstone proposed bumping the presentation to City Council to Monday, November 6 and doing it in person. There was discussion about having a small group work on a recommendation for trees similar to what they are doing for the CIP/CFP recommendation. Board Members Golembiewski, Maxwell, and Tragus-Campbell volunteered to begin working on this before October 11. There was discussion about using the Comprehensive Plan discussion time for the vision statement and pushing the Highway 99 Community Renewal Program Update out. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Chair Gladstone noted she would be available but would be on east coast time on October 11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:34 p.m. Planning Board Meeting Minutes September 27, 2023 Page 7 of 7 Packet Pg. 531 10.4.f October 11, 2023 Memo To: Edmonds City Council Members From: Edmonds Planning Board Members Subject: 2024 CIP/CFP The Planning Board received a presentation from the Public Works and Parks Departments outlining the projects that make up their recommended 2024 CIP/CFP at the September 27 Planning Board meeting. While some of the Board members had attended the Council briefing on September 19, some had not. However, a copy of the CIP/CFP had been provided to Planning Board members by Planning Department staff in early September. The presentation provided to the Planning Board and Council was similar to those provided in past years Individual and groups of projects were reviewed without background on how project decisions were made. It was a list of what projects would be done, when, at what cost and from what funds. We presume a lot of thought went into developing this, yet the document does not include any analysis or ranking criteria that provides an understanding of how projects were prioritized. We believe Council and the community needs to understand those ranking criteria to assess if the CIP/CFP is accomplishing desired policies, objectives, and priorities. The one policy direction that staff indicated is prioritizing the maintenance and repair of existing infrastructure over installing new. The current CIP/CFP prioritization of existing and new projects is likely to perpetuate and exacerbate the inequities that exist in the city that the Council has indicated they want to improve upon. Project prioritization in the current CIP/CFP results in those parts of the city that already have infrastructure amenities getting better ones and those without continuing to not have any. This becomes a glaring inequity when most all of the REET dollars are spent on street preservation in the near future in lieu of expanding sidewalk networks. No new sidewalks are planned to be constructed until 2028 at the earliest. Some of the badly needed sidewalks, like 2361h St. SW between 84th Ave. W. and HWY 99 where children walk to school every day on this arterial, are not in the 2024 CIP/CFP. We recommend that Council seek from staff the ranking criteria of how the projects within the CIP/CFP were selected. In addition, if the Council is serious about addressing infrastructure inequities, then the information provided to the Council needs to be organized and analyzed differently for better informed decision - making. This can be done by organizing the revenues and expenditures for specific projects to more easily see which projects are benefiting from the most discretionary of funding sources- REET. It would also be informative to see a list of projects that are being funded by development impact fees. This will give Council a better picture of what can be moved around to accomplish Council objectives to improve equity. The Parks CIP/CFP has information organized this way; Public Works portion of the document does not. To accomplish equity goals, we also recommend that select projects in the current CIP/CFP be deferred to address community needs. One example is the Green Streets project (PWT-64). While it does not have any current secured sources of funding, the fact that it is listed in the CIP indicates where staff resources Packet Pg. 532 10.4.f will go to secure funding. For example, instead of seeking grants or other funding sources for that, they could reallocate the projected estimate dollars of that project towards seeking funding for sidewalks that are critical for pedestrian safety and wheelchair bound residents trying to navigate arterials without any form of walkway. To meet the timeline for Council's approval of the CIP/CFP the Planning Board is providing recommendations for how you can make a better -informed decision rather than making a recommendation to approve or not approve this CIP/CFP. In previous years the Planning Board has requested to get information earlier about the criteria and policy direction for identifying projects and their timing. Perhaps next year we will be better able to provide a more conclusive recommendation to you. Packet Pg. 533 10.4.g CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW Packet Pg. 534 10.4.g The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a six -year financial planning tool that identifies future capital investments and potential strategies for funding those investments. The CIP also satisfies various requirements of city planning under Washington State's Growth Management Act. The City of Edmonds owns and operates a variety of physical assets, ranging from community parks, roadways, and public facilities including, City Hall a library building, fire stations, maintenance yard and wastewater treatment plan, utilities infrastructure and more. The City must properly maintain these assets in order to ensure they are safe, lasting, and provide a welcoming and usable space to serve their intended purposes. The City's capital infrastructure supports City operations, direct public services and programs, and in some cases, provides direct public benefits themselves. Every year during the annual budget process, the city adopts a six -year CIP, which outlines anticipated investments over that timeframe. The 2024-2029 Proposed CIP totals $301.7 million over six years, with approximately $22.1 million of that amount designated for the 2024 budget year. CAPITAL PLANNING POLICIES The City has historically based capital planning efforts on a set of criteria that help set priorities among potential capital programs. Each department has its own policies to prioritize projects based on Council Priorities and specific department needs. Specifically for public works, Facilities, Transportation and Utility infrastructure the department utilizes a number of planning documents including the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Comprehensive Water System Plan, Comprehensive Sewer Plan, Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan and Facilities condition assessment, other planning documents include the ADA transition plan. For the Public Infrastructure Public works primary goal is to protect the city's investment by maintaining its assets and investing at the right time. Most capital assets when properly maintained can continue to provide a high level of service throughout their life, but if not maintained it can turn into the proverbial money pit, in which minimum investment reduces the level of service and require higher cost to bring back to adequate level of service. The criteria used to prioritize projects include: • Risk to Health, Safety and Environment and Regulatory or Mandated Requirement • Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs and Asset Longevity Packet Pg. 535 10.4.g • Level and quality of Service • Sustainability and Conservation • Funding Availability • Project Readiness • Multiple Category Benefit and Bundling Opportunities • Preserve and maintain existing capital assets; • Support the goals of the City's plans; • Support economic development; • Seek regional funding for regional projects; • Pursue cost -saving commitments; and, • Pursue conservation and sustainability investments. Project Cost Estimate Review and Validation Process Estimated cost for CIP is a difficult process that requires extensive due diligence to adequately reflect the expected cost of a project. The first year is the most accurate while years 2-3 can be costs based on conceptual or early designs and years 4-6 can be only a rough order of magnitude based on conceptual design or other engineering knowledge of similar project costs in our area. In general, as projects get closer to construction the estimates improve as designs get finalized and estimates include the most recent cost factors that can affect a project. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDIN Like all municipalities, Edmonds relies on a variety of sources to pay for capital projects. These include locally generated revenues (taxes, fees, voter -approved levies, utility rates, and user fees), intergovernmental revenues (including state and federal grants), private funding (franchise utilities, philanthropy) and debt issuance. These traditional sources continue to provide the majority of funding for capital facility investments. The City's level of capital investment is based on the mix and amount of financial resources available to the City. DEBT FINANCING For public works projects the city traditionally has used debt finance only for projects that are not part of the normal maintenance or planned replacement program. These projects include high cost projects or programs to meet new regulatory requirements or projects that require significant investment and new or unexpected needs, examples of this is the replacement of the incinerator at the wastewater treatment plant and the seismic upgrades to the water reservoirs, in both cases the debt payment is built into the utility rate fees. Other financed projects must be repaid from the same limited resources Packet Pg. 536 10.4.g used to fund the operation and maintenance of the specific infrastructure, for example facilities maintenance projects use the same general fund sources to pay that debt. Current financed projects: Project Program Amount Carbon Recovery Project Wastewater Treatment Plant Facilities Backlog of Maintenance and repair Facilities PUBLIC UTILITY FUNDING Edmonds Water, Wastewater and Storm drain projects are funded with revenues from utility rates (Enterprise Funds). Each utility has adopted financial policies that determine what share of their capital investments are funded through cash, and what share from debt. Generally, the long range utility upgrades and replacement projects are planned and financed through cash, this provides a steady improvement process for the utility and at the same time maintain steady utility rates, this projects include yearly pipe replacement and minor maintenance items. Large projects like the reservoir improvements or the replacement of the incinerator at the WWTP are financed from debt. REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (REET) Funding of the City's general government capital program is highly dependent on revenue from Real Estate Excise Tax, which is an excise tax imposed on the sale of real property. REET is a relatively volatile revenue source that generally tracks closely to local economic activity. REET funds are divided 50/50 between Public Works and Parks, Public Works uses these primarily to fund the pavement preservation program. REET revenue has been a significant source to fund the pavement preservation program, in addition to fuel tax and general fund, over the last few years general fund contributions have declined and the pavement preservation program has invested only a fraction of what is recommended, reduced preservation efforts are not immediate but the city is starting to see those effects in current pavement condition index, it has declined from mid 70's to low 60's. The 2024 Proposed Budget maintains the commitment made in the 2020 budget to use $25 million of the City's REET revenue for capital investments in new affordable housing. While additional funding for affordable housing is clearly a priority for the City, ongoing investments in our existing facilities is necessary to support the provision of other City services and to avoid costly projects that result from neglect and deferred maintenance. Packet Pg. 537 10.4.g EDMONDS'S RECENT HISTORY - DEBT FINANCE AND NEW REVENUE SOURCES In addition to reliance upon general tax sources, Edmonds has recently taken major capital projects that required debt finance. Projects include improvements to Civic Field, construction of a new system to replace the incinerator at the wastewater treatment plant, and facilities backlog of maintenance and repair needs. The following is a list recent funding sources that contribute to the CIP: • Vehicle tab fees: The vehicle tab fee was increased from $20 to $40, this provides for approximately $700K increase per year that is used to fund the in-house maintenance and preservation efforts of our street infrastructure, this increase is a welcome revenue to keep up with the costs of growth of our infrastructure and systems and increased salaries, materials and equipment costs. While it is not directly contributing to our annual pavement preservation program it provides some relief by providing ongoing maintenance and repair and preventing significant degradation of our roadway infrastructure. As our preservation program continues to struggle with adequate funding it is critical that funding for our in-house crews is available, the less invested in preservation the more the city will have to invest in frequent calls for repairs. • Reservoir Improvements: It is expected that debt finance will be required for the repairs and improvements necessary for this project. • Nutrient Removal (WWTP): This is a long term project that will require significant changes to the treatment process and will require debt financing. Given general resource funding challenges, the City will continue to rely on mix of general government resources, grants and debt funding packages to complete major capital projects and to secure needed funding for basic asset preservation. The City has identified several major priority areas for which significant capital investments will be needed. The following sections describe these priority areas at a high level. PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES Planning for the future of Edmonds's public safety facilities is critical to maintaining the high level of service expected of Edmonds Police Department (EPD). The departments has grown significantly and outgrow the existing facility, in addition there is a need to establish a facility that better serves the area around HWY 99 and options for that are being explored. Thes include neighborhood precinct projects that will accommodate police staffing growth. Packet Pg. 538 10.4.g TRANSPORTATION The City's existing transportation network faces an extensive backlog of major maintenance. Current funding is insufficient to maintain the City's roads, traffic signals, signs, etc. In addition, the city is in the process of updating the General Transportation Plan this will provide with a better CIP needs for investments in a transit network, bicycle facilities, and pedestrian -oriented infrastructure. As funding becomes available the city will need to update the ADA transition plan and find funding sources to make progress on correcting ADA deficiencies. Over the last five years with a combination of strategies including grant funding and bundling of ADA projects in our pavement preservation the city has made significant improvement, updating approximately 10% of the identified deficiencies, however at that rate it will take 50 years to correct all deficiencies. Projects The largest project — the Highway 99 Corridor —Gateway proiect is a multiyear project. Highway 99 is a key regional corridor that extends into Edmonds from 244th Street SW to 210th Street SW It is comprised of a 2.25-mile stretch of Highway 99 (a state highway) and the land area around it. Parts of this corridor are adjacent to the jurisdictions of Shoreline, Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, and Snohomish County. It is also within WSDOT's limited access at the SR 104 interchange. The City of Edmonds has been working with the community, business owners, and other stakeholders on planning for the future revitalization of the Highway 99 Corridor for several years now. Five major projects have been undertaken toward revitalizing this corridor Pedestrian Safety Traffic Calming Pavement Preservation UTILITIES The City Wastewater Treatment Plant is nearing the completion of the Carbon Recovery Project, this project replaces the old incinerator. The plant as the all plants in the Peugeot sound will have to comply with new nutrient removal standards, this will require significant investment to meet the new requirements The city has completed upgrades to one reservoir and recent inspection and condition assessment resulted in required seismic upgrades to two concrete reservoirs. The projects will be designed in 2024 with the goal to complete construction in 2024. Packet Pg. 539 10.4.g Current Projects The largest project —the Carbon Recovery project —construct a new system to replace the incinerator and is nearing completion. Annual pipe replacement projects for water and sewer systems and annual projects to update or improve the stormwater system are planned every year to keep up with the need to replace systems that are past their life expectancy or that have records of failure. Funding All utility projects are funded by the Enterprise fund, either cash financed or debt. The 2024-2029 Proposed CIP totals $301 million for six years and includes approximately 60 projects'. Approximately $106 million of the six -year total, or 35 %, are utility projects funded by utility rates. The Edmonds Transportation's CIP totals $XX.XX million (XX%) over the six -year period, while the remaining departments (Parks and Recreation, Finance and Administrative Services, , and Edmonds Information Technology Department) account for approximately $XX million, or XX%, of the six- year CIP. 1 The project total includes all projects with a CIP Project Page in the 2024-2029 Proposed CIP. 2024-2029 PROPOSED CIP BY DEPARTMENT (OOOS) Packet Pg. 540 10.4.g Department 2023 Adopted 2024 Proposed 2023- 2027Propose d CIP 2024-2029 Proposed CIP Total Transportation Facilities Parks and Recreation Subtotal City -owned Utilities Storm Water Wastewater Water Subtotal City Total Note: 2021 Adopted totals are based on the 2021-2026 Adopted CIP. Not all funds above are appropriated; see the 2024 Proposed Budget for a list of capital appropriations by department. 2024 PROPOSED CIP BY DEPARTMENT - $XXXX MILLION Insert chart here (2024 proposed column) Packet Pg. 541 10.4.g The table below identifies funding sources for the 2024-2029 Proposed CIP by Revenue Source Group 2024-2029 PROPOSED CIP REVENUES (OOOS) Revenue Source Group 2023 Adopted 2024 Proposed 202-2026 Proposed CIP 2024-2029 Proposed CIP Total General Fund Grants (Federal) Grants (State) REET Utilities Other TBD Note: 2024 Adopted totals are based on the 2024-2029 Adopted CIP 2024 PROPOSED CIP BY REVENUE SOURCE - $XXXXX MILLION Insert chart here (use 2024 column) Packet Pg. 542 10.4.g ASSET PRESERVATION Asset Preservation studies are required for all utilities, the city also completes these for facilities and pavement system. The studies include analysis to determine condition of the asset and predict the level of deterioration of all systems. This results in the recommended level of investment on preservation efforts and in some cases the replacement schedule for an asset. As result of facilities condition assessment, the council approved a bond to invest in the backlog of facilities maintenance, and is expected that it will take 2-3 years to complete recommended projects. The utilities teams continuously rate the infrastructure, for example the operations team perform video inspection of sewer and storm drainpipes and rates those to update the on -going annual replacement program and performs leak detection of the water system to identify what pipes are failing and plan for the repair or replacement. The team also tracks age of all systems and failures to determine what must be replaced to prevent emergency repair and higher costs. The pavement preservation program is completed every other year and provides the condition of our network and generates the recommended investment to maintain our network in a safe and reliable condition. The most current Pavement Condition Index (PCI) map is included below. As described above, City investments in capital projects are guided by a set of key policies reflecting the City's values and priorities. These policies shape how the City takes care of buildings and infrastructure, invests in capital projects in areas that have accepted growth as envisioned in the City's Comprehensive Plan, preserves the City's buildings, supports sustainable building practices, and ensures that all members of the community have access to the economic opportunities capital projects create. The following section details some of these key policies. CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan is a 20-year vision and roadmap for Edmonds's future. The plan guides City decisions on where to focus development for new jobs and households, how to improve our transportation system, and where to make capital investments such as utilities, sidewalks, and other public facilities. The Plan is the framework for most of Edmonds's big -picture decisions on how to grow The latest update of the City's Comprehensive Plan was completed in 2020. The City began the process of updating its Comprehensive Plan in 2023 and the work is scheduled to be complete in 2024. 10 Packet Pg. 543 10.4.g The current Comprehensive Plan helped inform the development of the 2024-2029 Proposed CIP. This effort is intended to make sure areas receiving growth have the appropriate physical infrastructure to accommodate such growth, while balancing the major maintenance of existing facilities, such as adequate transportation systems, utilities, and other public facilities. UTILITIES MASTER PLANS The three utilities are required to have plans that to ensure the utility is keeping up with the growth and being properly operated to ensure its safety and reliability the there plans are: Comprehensive Water System Plan, Comprehensive Sewer Pla Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS The City's utilities have several facility projects in their Capital Improvement Programs to meet federal and state regulatory requirements. The City of Edmonds must abide by the City's two National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, one for storm water and one for combined sewer system. The City is required, for example, to invest in the combined sewer/storm water system to control the meet state and federal requirements for city generated flows into receiving bodies of water, including creeks and Puget Sound. This work is necessary to meet Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Ecology (DOE) requirements, regarding sewage releases from the city conveyance system. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT(ADA)TRANSITION PLAN In an effort to make the City of Edmond's public right-of-way facilities accessible to all, the City is in engaged in developing an American with Disabilities Act (ADA) ADA transition plan for the Public Right - of -Way. The ADA Transition Plan for the Right -of -Way demonstrates the City of Edmond's commitment to providing equal access to all of its public programs, services, facilities, and activities for citizens with disabilities. This plan is focused on pedestrian access routes within the right-of-way and includes sidewalks, curb ramps, street crossings, driveway crossings, rail crossings, hazards, and pedestrian activated signal systems. The Plan includes the following: Program accessibility guidelines, standards and resources Physical obstacles that limit the accessibility of facilities to individuals with disabilities Methods to be used to make the facilities accessible Prioritization and scheduling process 11 Packet Pg. 544 10.4.g • Estimated budget for barrier removal • Identification of the ADA Coordinator • Public outreach process for Plan development • ADA grievance procedure CLIMATE ACTION PLAN In 2010, the City adopted its first Climate Action Plan (CAP) to substantially reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The City hired local consultants in 2018 to prepare a new GHG inventory and advise the City on updating its CAP for 2023 and beyond. This updated plan focuses on the most important steps Edmonds can take to address climate change. City Council adopted the 2023 Climate Action Plan on March 21st, 2023, via Resolution 1518. The 2023 Plan serves as Edmonds' guide to climate neutrality for municipal and community greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. This goal aligns with the maximum average global temperature increase of 1.52C/2.72F aspired to in the 2016 Paris Climate Accords. 12 Packet Pg. 545