Loading...
REVIEWED BLD-BLD2022-0616+ GEO REPORTRECEIVED May 11 2022 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT April 26, 2022 Project No. 22-086 Brian and Nicole Kunkel 752 Walnut Street Edmonds, WA 98020 BLD2022-0616 ............................................... REVIEWED BY CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, Washington Dear Brian and Nicole: F�LnGEO C O R P 9 R A T E D Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering Consultants As requested, PanGEO Inc. completed a geotechnical engineering study to assist the design team for the proposed remodeling located at 752 Walnut Street in Edmonds, Washington. This study was performed in general accordance with our mutually agreed scope of work outlined in our proposal dated February 1, 2022, and subsequently approved by you on February 15, 2022. Our service scope included reviewing readily available geologic and geotechnical data, drilling two test borings, conducting a site reconnaissance, performing engineering analysis, and developing the conclusions and recommendations presented in this report. SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at 752 Walnut Street in the City of Edmonds, Washington (see Figure 1, Vicinity Map). The subject property is an approximately 6,524 square foot, rectangular -shaped lot. It is bordered to the north by Walnut Street, to the south and east by access driveways, and to the west by an existing single-family residence. The site is currently occupied by a two-story single-family house. The site grade generally slopes down from south to north with a vertical relief of about 16 feet and average gradient of about 15%. The layout of the site is shown on Figure 2, Site and Exploration Plan. 3213 Eastlake Ave E, Ste B Seattle, WA 98102 Tel (206) 262-0370 Fax (206) 262-0374 Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 Plate 1. View of the existing house on the north side of Plate 2. Rear view of the existing house, deck, and patio. the property, looking south from Walnut Street. Looking north from the southwest property corner. We understand that the proposed project consists of a major interior remodel. A new deck and patio are also planned to be constructed to the west and south of the house. According to the City of Edmonds GIS maps, the site is mapped within an erosion geologic hazard area. As such, a geotechnical report will be required for the building permit application. The conclusions and recommendations outlined in this report are based on our understanding of the proposed improvements, which is in turn based on the project information provided to us. If the above project description is substantially different from your proposed improvements, or if the project scope changes, PanGEO should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this study and make modifications, if needed. SITE GEOLOGY According to the Geologic Map of the Edmonds East Quadrangle (Minard, 1983), the primary geologic unit in the vicinity of the site is Advance Outwash (Map Unit Qva). Advance outwash typically consists of moderately to well sorted, slightly oxidized sand and gravel deposited by glacial meltwater that was also subsequently overridden by glacial ice. Advance outwash therefore also typically exhibits low compressibility and high strength characteristics in its undisturbed state. 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 2 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND CONDITIONS CURRENT TEST BORINGS Two borings (PG-1 and PG-2) were drilled at the site on March 13, 2022, using an acker limited access drill rig operated by CN Drilling of Seattle, Washington under contract to PanGEO. The borings were drilled to a maximum depth of about 9 and 11 %2 feet below existing grade when drilling refusal was met. The approximate boring locations were located in the field by measuring from property corners and site features and are shown on Figure 2. The test borings were drilled using 6-inch outside diameter hollow stem augers. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed in the borings at 21/2-foot depth intervals using a standard, 2-inch diameter split -spoon sampler. The sampler was advanced with a 140-pound drop hammer falling a distance of 30 inches for each strike, in general accordance with ASTM D-1586, Standard Test Method for Penetration Test and Split Barrel Sampling of Soils. The number of blows required for each 6-inch increment of sampler penetration was recorded. The number of blows required to achieve the last 12 inches of sample penetration is defined as the SPT N-value. The N-value provides an empirical measure of the relative density of cohesionless soil, or the relative consistency of fine-grained soils. A geologist from PanGEO was present during the field explorations to observe the drilling, assist in sampling, and describe and document the soil samples obtained from the borings. The soil samples were described using the system outlined on Figure A-1. The summary boring logs are included in Appendix A as Figures A-2 and A-3. PREVIOUS TEST BORINGS As part of our study, we collected and reviewed readily available geologic and geotechnical data in the site vicinity. Specifically, we reviewed the logs of test borings B-1 through B-3 previously completed at the site for foundation underpinning (see Figure 2). The summary logs for the previous test borings are included as Appendix B for reference. SOIL The test borings advanced at the site generally encountered up to about 11 feet of loose fill overlying medium dense sand and gravel (Advance Outwash). The soils encountered in the test borings are generally consistent with the mapped geology at the site. The following is a brief 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 3 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 description of the soils encountered in the test borings drilled at the site. Please refer to the summary test boring logs in Appendices A and B for additional details. UNIT 1: Fill — This soil unit was encountered in all test boring. The fill encountered generally consisted of loose sand with gravel some debris. This soil unit extended to about 5 feet below the existing ground surface in PG-1, to about 1 foot in PG-2, to about 8 feet in the previous boring B-1, and to about I I feet in B-2 and B-3. We interpreted this soil unit as fill. UNIT 2: Advance Ouwwash (Qva) — Below the fill, each boring encountered medium dense to dense sand to sandy gravel that extended to the termination depths of the borings. We interpreted this soil unit as the mapped Advance outwash deposits. GROUNDWATER Groundwater was observed within the drilling depth at each of the test borings at depths of about 2 to 5 feet below existing grade during drilling. Generally, the water table follows the existing grade, and water flows from south to north. The observed groundwater elevations are summarized in the Table 1 below. Table 1— Summary of Observed Groundwater at Time of Drilling Test Boring Approximate Ground Surface Elevation (ft) Approximate Depth to Groundwater (ft) Approximate Groundwater Elevation (ft) PG-1 212 5.0 207 PG-2 207 2.0 205 B-1 207 5.0 202 B-2 205 4.0 201 B-3 205 5.0 200 It should be noted that groundwater levels will fluctuate depending on the season, amount of rainfall, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally, the water level is higher and seepage rates are greater in the wetter, winter months (typically October through May). 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 4 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 GEOLOGICALLY HAZARDOUS AREAS ASSESSMENT Based on a review of the City of Edmonds GIS map and the Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC), the north and south portions of the subject site are mapped within an Erosion Hazard Area. The rockery and slope along the north property line is considered as a steep slope (greater than 33% slope). LANDSLIDE HAZARDS EVALUATION Based on review of the topographic survey map provided to us and our field observations, the site generally slopes down from the south to the north with an average slope gradient of about 15 percent. However, the rockery and slope along the north property line, which is approximately 5 feet in height, appears to meet the steep slope definition (33% or greater slopes). Based on the soil data in the test borings, it is our opinion that this steep slope is the result of the previous grading due to street and site development. It is also our opinion that the risk for the potential future landslide is considered minimum, and the site is not mapped as a landslide hazard area. A site reconnaissance of the subject property was conducted on March 13, 2022. During our site reconnaissance, we did not observe obvious evidence of past slope instability or ground movement at the subject site. Based on our field observations and the results of subsurface data at the subject site, in our opinion, the subject site appears to be globally stable in its current configuration. Furthermore, it is our opinion that the proposed remodeling as currently planned are feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint. It is our further opinion that the proposed remodeling as currently planned will not adversely affect the overall stability of the site or adjacent properties, provided the recommendations outlined herein are followed and the proposed remodeling is properly designed and constructed. EROSION HAZARDS EVALUATION According to USDA Soil Conservation Service Map, the site soil is mapped as the Alderwood- Urban land complex, 2 to 8 percent slopes. Based on the soils encountered in the test borings and site topography, the near -surface site soils are anticipated to exhibit slight to moderate erosion potential. However, due to very minor ground disturbance and excavations planned, in our opinion, the potential erosion hazards at the site can be effectively mitigated with the best management practice during construction and with properly designed and implemented landscaping for permanent erosion control. During construction, the temporary erosion hazard can be effectively managed with an appropriate erosion and sediment control plan, including but 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 5 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 not limited to installing silt fence at the construction perimeter, limiting removal of vegetation to the construction area, placing rocks or hay bales at the disturbed/traffic areas and on the downhill side of the project, covering stockpile soil or cut slopes with plastic sheets, constructing a temporary drainage pond to control surface runoff and sediment trap if needed, placing rocks at the construction entrance, etc. Permanent erosion control measures should include establishing vegetation, landscape plants, and hardscape established at the end of project. 23.80.060 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS — GENERAL REQUIREMENTS According to ECDC 23.80.060, alterations of geologically hazardous areas or associated buffers may only occur for activities that: 1. Will not increase the threat of the geological hazard to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions; 2. Will not adversely impact other critical areas; 3. Are designed so that the hazard to the project is eliminated or mitigated to a level equal to or less than predevelopment conditions; and 4. Are certified as safe as designed and under anticipated conditions by a qualified engineer or geologist, licensed in the state of Washington. Based on the site subsurface information and our understanding of the current plans, it is our opinion that the proposed project meets the above conditions, and will not have adverse impacts to the subject and surrounding properties during and after construction, provided that project is constructed in accordance with the approved plans and commonly accepted practice. 23.80.070 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS — SPECIFIC HAZARDS The portions of subject site are mapped as erosion hazard areas. However, based on the soil conditions and proposed improvements, it is our opinion that building setback and buffer distance are not required for the currently proposed improvements. ECDC 23.80.070 states that alterations of an erosion or landslide area hazard area, minimum building setback and/or buffer may only occur for activities for which a hazards analysis is submitted and certifies that: a. The alteration will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions; 22-086 752 walnut St Geoxpt Page 6 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 b. The alteration will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties; and c. Such alterations will not adversely impact other critical areas. In our opinion, the proposed improvements as currently planned meet the above conditions. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS MITIGATIONS Based on the results of our evaluation of the potential geologic hazards at the site, it is our opinion that no specific mitigation, other than the erosion measure discussed above, is required for the proposed improvements. GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS SEISMIC SITE CLASS We anticipate that the seismic design of the structures will be accomplished using the 2018 editions of the International Building Code (IBC), which specifies a design earthquake having a 2% probability of occurrence in 50 years (return interval of 2,475 years). Based on site soil conditions, it is our opinion that Site Class D (stiff soils) should be used for this project. BUILDING FOUNDATIONS Based on the subsurface conditions encountered at the site and our understanding of the planned remodeling, it is our opinion that the proposed building may be supported on conventional footings. The footings should bear on medium dense to dense native soils or on properly compacted structural fill placed on competent native soils. Exterior foundation elements should be placed at a minimum depth of 18 inches below final exterior grade. Interior spread foundations should be placed at a minimum depth of 12 inches below the top of slab. Soil Bearing Pressure We recommend that an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) be used to size the footings. The recommended allowable bearing pressure is for dead plus live loads. For allowable stress design, the recommended bearing pressure may be increased by one- third for transient loading, such as wind or seismic forces. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of 18 and 24 inches, respectively. 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 7 PanGEO, hic. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 In designing the footings, the shape of footings will need to be considered in regard to the available space for temporary excavations. Where space may be limited for an unsupported open cut, it may be necessary to use L-shaped perimeter footings in order to conserve space and to allow the temporary excavations to be made within the property limits. Foundation Performance Footings designed and constructed in accordance with the above recommendations should experience total settlement of less than one inch and differential settlement of about 1/2 inch. Most of the anticipated settlement should occur during construction as dead loads are applied. Lateral Resistance Lateral loads on the structures may be resisted by passive earth pressure developed against the embedded faces of the foundation system and by frictional resistance between the bottom of the foundation and the supporting subgrade soils. For footings bearing on the firm native soil or compacted structural fill, a frictional coefficient of 0.35 may be used to evaluate sliding resistance developed between the concrete and the compacted subgrade soil. Passive soil resistance may be calculated using an equivalent fluid weight of 320 pcf, assuming properly compacted structural fill will be placed against the footings. The above values include a factor of safety of 1.5. Unless covered by pavements or slabs, the passive resistance in the upper 12 inches of soil should be neglected. Perimeter Footing Drains Footing drains should be installed around the building perimeters, at or just below the invert of the footings. Under no circumstances should roof downspout drain lines be connected to the footing drain systems. Roof downspouts must be separately tightlined to appropriate discharge locations. Cleanouts should be installed at strategic locations to allow for periodic maintenance of the footing drain and downspout tightline systems. Footing Subgrade Preparation All footing subgrades should be in a firm and unyielding condition prior to setting forms and placing rebar. Any loose or softened soil should be removed from the footing excavations. The adequacy of the footing subgrade soils should be verified by a representative of PanGEO, prior to placing forms or rebar. 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 8 PanGEO, hic. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 PIPE PILES Based on the results of test boring PG-1, the southwest portion of the site is underlain approximately five feet of very loose to loose fill. The depth of bearing soil is estimated about five feet below existing grade. Depending on the final footing elevations, estimated 3 to 5 feet of over -excavation may be required to reach the bearing soil. As such, the proposed deck footings on the west side of the building may be supported on pin piles in lieu of over -excavation. Nominal two-inch diameter pin piles are typically installed using portable, handheld equipment and are suited for areas where limited site access exists. The number of piles required depends on the magnitude of the design load. An allowable axial compression capacity of 3 tons (6 kips) may be used per 2-inch diameter pile. Larger pin piles will require machine -mounted pile hammer, and therefore may not be practical for this project. The lateral capacity of 2-inch diameter pin piles should be ignored. In addition, the friction at the base of pile -supported footings should also be ignored. An allowable passive pressure of 250 pcf may be used to calculate the lateral resistance of foundation elements. If needed, the pin piles may be battered to provide additional lateral capacity. We recommend that the following specifications be included on the foundation plan for two-inch diameter pin piles: 1. 2-inch diameter piles should consist of Schedule-80, ASTM A-53 Grade "A" pipe. 2. 2-inch diameter piles shall be driven to refusal with a minimum 90-lb jackhammer. Refusal is defined as no more than 1 inch of penetration for 1 minute of continuous driving. 3. Piles shall be driven in nominal sections and connected with compression fitted sleeve couplers (see detail below — Courtesy of McDowell Pile King, Kent, WA). We discourage welding of pipe joints, particularly when galvanized pipe is used, as we have frequently observed welds broken during driving. 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 9 PanGEO, hic. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 IT to 18,. Pipe I D. 2" to 6" I I New Steel Pipe Section --�— ---1 T 1 1/4" to 2" wide X-Strong Steel Ring 1!4" filet welded to pipe sleeve Driven Steel Pipe Section Beveled End to aid insertion 4. The geotechnical engineer of record or his/her representative shall provide full time observation of pile installation. The quality of a pin pile foundation is dependent, in part, on the experience and professionalism of the installation company. We recommend that a company with experienced personnel be selected to install the piles. CONCRETE SLAB -ON -GRADE Conventional slab -on -grade concrete floors, if needed, may be used for this project. The floor slabs should be supported on competent native soil or structural fill placed on competent native soils. Any over -excavations, if needed, should be backfilled with structural fill. The concrete slab -on -grade floors should be underlain by at least 4 inches of capillary break, which consists of free -draining, clean crushed rock or well -graded gravel compacted to a firm and unyielding condition. The capillary break material should have no more than 20 percent passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 5 percent by weight of the material passing the U.S. Standard No. 100 sieve. We also recommend that a minimum 10-mil polyethylene vapor barrier be placed below the proposed floor slabs. UNDERSLAB DRAIN Due to the groundwater encountered near the proposed lower floor, a subslab drainage system is recommended below the concrete slabs in addition to perimeter footing drains. In general, the under -slab drainage system should consist of minimum 4-inch diameter perforated drainpipes 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 10 Paril Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 placed in narrow, approximately 18-inch deep trenches (measured from the bottom of slab) spaced about 15 feet apart. The trenches should be backfilled with clean, free -draining 3/8-inch washed gravel (City of Seattle Type 9) or 3/4-inch washed sandy gravel (City of Seattle Type 26). Water collected in these drainpipes should be conveyed to a permanent sump pump and discharged to an appropriate outlet. The design of the slab drain may be refined based on the final design of the building. RETAINING WALL DESIGN PARAMETERS Retaining walls, if needed, should be designed to resist the lateral earth pressures exerted by the soils behind the wall. Proper drainage provisions should also be provided behind the walls to intercept and remove groundwater that may collect behind the walls. Lateral Earth Pressures Cantilever walls should be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf for a level backfill condition behind the walls assuming the walls are free to rotate. If the walls are restrained at the top from free movement, such as basement walls with a floor diaphragm, an equivalent fluid pressure of 45 pcf should be used for a level backfill condition behind the walls. Permanent walls should be designed for an additional uniform lateral pressure of 8H psf for seismic loading, where H corresponds to the height of the buried depth of the wall. The recommended lateral pressures assume the backfill behind the walls consists of a free draining and properly compacted fill with adequate drainage provisions. Surcharge Surcharge loads, where present, should also be included in the design of retaining walls. We recommend that a lateral load coefficient of 0.3 be used to compute the lateral pressure on the wall face resulting from surcharge loads located within a horizontal distance of one-half wall height. Lateral Resistance Lateral forces from seismic loading and unbalanced lateral earth pressures may be resisted by a combination of passive earth pressures acting against the embedded portions of the foundations and by friction acting on the base of the wall foundation. Passive resistance values may be determined using an equivalent fluid weight of 320 pcf. This value includes a factor of safety of 1.5, assuming the footing is backfilled with structural fill. A friction coefficient of 0.35 may be 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 11 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 used to determine the frictional resistance at the base of the footings. The coefficient includes a factor of safety of 1.5. Wall Drainage Provisions for wall drainage should consist of a 4-inch diameter perforated drainpipe behind and at the base of the wall footings, embedded in 12 to 18 inches of clean crushed rock and pea gravel wrapped with a layer of filter fabric. A minimum 18-inch wide zone of free draining granular soils (i.e. pea gravel or washed rock) is recommended to be placed adjacent to the wall for the full height of the wall. Alternatively, a composite drainage material, such as Miradrain 6000, may be used in lieu of the clean crushed rock or pea gravel. The drainpipe at the base of the wall should be graded to direct water to a suitable outlet. Wall Backf ill Retaining wall backfill should consist of free draining granular material. The site soils are relatively silty and would not meet the requirements for wall backfill. We recommend importing a free draining granular material, such as Seattle Type 17 or a soil meeting the requirements of Gravel Borrow as defined in Section 9-03.14(1) of the WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction (WSDOT, 2022). In areas where space is limited between the wall and the face of excavation, pea gravel may be used as backfill without compaction. Wall backfill should be properly moisture conditioned, placed in loose, horizontal lifts less than 12 inches in thickness, and compacted to a dense and unyielding condition. If density tests will be performed, the test results should show at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density, as determined using test method ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor). Within 5 feet of the wall, the backfill should be compacted with hand -operated equipment to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS SITE PREPARATION Site preparation for the proposed project includes removing existing deck and patio, stripping and clearing of surface vegetation and excavations to the design subgrade. All stripped surface materials should be properly disposed off -site or be "wasted" on site in non-structural landscaping areas. 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 12 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 Following site clearing and excavations, the adequacy of the subgrade where structural fill, foundations, slabs, or pavements are to be placed should be verified by a representative of PanGEO. The subgrade soil in the improvement areas, if recompacted and still yielding, should also be over - excavated and replaced with compacted structural fill. TEMPORARY EXCAVATIONS As currently planned, the proposed construction may require excavations up to five feet below the existing grade. We anticipate the excavations to mainly encounter loose fill over medium dense to dense native soils. All temporary excavations should be performed in accordance with Part N of WAC (Washington Administrative Code) 296-155. The contractor is responsible for maintaining safe excavation slopes and/or shoring. All temporary excavations deeper than a total of 4 feet should be sloped or shored. Based on the soil conditions at the site, for planning purposes, it is our opinion that temporary excavations for the proposed construction may be sloped 1H:1V (Horizontal:Vertical) or flatter. Based on our current understanding of the anticipated building layout and finished floor elevation, it appears that sufficient space is available for unsupported open cuts. Where space may be limited, the use of L-shaped footings may be required to conserve space for the temporary cuts. In event that sufficient space is not available for unsupported open cuts, temporary shoring will be needed to support the temporary excavations. The temporary excavations and cut slopes should be re-evaluated in the field during construction based on actual observed soil conditions, and may need to be flattened in the wet seasons and should be covered with plastic sheets. We also recommend that heavy construction equipment, building materials, excavated soil, and vehicular traffic should not be allowed within a distance equal to 1/3 the slope height from the top of any excavation. MATERIAL REUSE In the context of this report, structural fill is defined as compacted fill placed under footings, concrete stairs and landings, and slabs, or other load -bearing areas. In our opinion, the on -site soils are relatively silty with high moisture content and will be difficult to compact to a dense condition. As such, on -site sand is not suitable to be used as structural fill, but can be used as wall backfill and general fill in the non-structural areas. If use of the on -site soil is planned, the 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 13 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 excavated soil should be stockpiled and protected with plastic sheeting to prevent softening from rainfall in the wet season. STRUCTURAL FILL PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION Structural fill, if needed, should consist of imported, well -graded, granular material, such as City of Seattle Type 17, WSDOT Section 9-03.9(3) Crushed Surfacing Base Course (WSDOT 2022), or an approved equivalent. Structural fill should be properly moisture conditioned, placed in loose, horizontal lifts less than 12 inches in thickness, and compacted to a dense and unyielding condition. The adequacy of compaction should be verified by a PanGEO representative. Alternatively, if density tests will be performed, the test results should indicate a minimum 95 percent relative compaction level as determined using ASTM D-1557 (Modified Proctor). The procedure to achieve proper density of a compacted fill depends on the size and type of compaction equipment, the number of passes, thickness of the lifts being compacted, and certain soil properties. If the excavation to be backfilled is constricted and limits the use of heavy equipment, smaller equipment can be used, but the lift thickness will need to be reduced to achieve the required relative compaction. Generally, loosely compacted soils are a result of poor construction technique or improper moisture content. Soils with high fines contents are particularly susceptible to becoming too wet and coarse -grained materials easily become too dry, for proper compaction. Soils with a moisture content too high for adequate compaction should be dried as necessary, or moisture conditioned by mixing with drier materials, or other methods. WET WEATHER EARTHWORK In our opinion, the proposed construction may be accomplished during wet weather (such as in winter) without adversely affecting the site stability. However, earthwork construction performed during the drier summer months likely will be more economical. Winter construction will require the implementation of best management erosion and sedimentation control practices to reduce the chance of off -site sediment transport. Some of the site soils contain a high percentage of fines and are moisture sensitive. Any footing subgrade soils that become softened either by disturbance or rainfall should be removed and replaced with structural fill, Controlled 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 14 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 Density Fill (CDF), or lean -mix concrete. General recommendations relative to earthwork performed in wet conditions are presented below: • Site stripping, excavation and subgrade preparation should be followed promptly by the placement and compaction of clean structural fill or CDF; • The size and type of construction equipment used may have to be limited to prevent soil disturbance; • The ground surface within the construction area should be graded to promote run-off of surface water and to prevent the ponding of water; • Geotextile silt fences should be strategically located to control erosion and the movement of soil; • Structural fill should consist of less than 5% fines; and • Excavation slopes should be covered with plastic sheets. SURFACE DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONSIDERATIONS Surface runoff can be controlled during construction by careful grading practices. Typically, this includes the construction of shallow, upgrade perimeter ditches or low earthen berms in conjunction with silt fences to collect runoff and prevent water from entering excavations or to prevent runoff from the construction area from leaving the immediate work site. Temporary erosion control may require the use of hay bales on the downhill side of the project to prevent water from leaving the site and potential storm water detention to trap sand and silt before the water is discharged to a suitable outlet. All collected water should be directed under control to a positive and permanent discharge system. Permanent control of surface water should be incorporated in the final grading design. Adequate surface gradients and drainage systems should be incorporated into the design such that surface runoff is directed away from structures. Potential problems associated with erosion may also be reduced by establishing vegetation within disturbed areas immediately following grading operations. ADDITIONAL SERVICES To confirm that our recommendations are properly incorporated into the design and construction of the proposed remodeling, PanGEO should be retained to conduct a review of the final project plans and specifications, and to monitor the construction of geotechnical elements. Modifications 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 15 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 to our recommendations presented in this report may be necessary, based on the actual conditions encountered during construction. CLOSURE We have prepared this report for Brian and Nicole Kunkel and the project design team. Recommendations contained in this report are based on a site reconnaissance, a subsurface exploration program, review of pertinent subsurface information, and our understanding of the project. The study was performed using a mutually agreed -upon scope of work. Variations in soil conditions may exist between the locations of the explorations and the actual conditions underlying the site. The nature and extent of soil variations may not be evident until construction occurs. If any soil conditions are encountered at the site that are different from those described in this report, we should be notified immediately to review the applicability of our recommendations. Additionally, we should also be notified to review the applicability of our recommendations if there are any changes in the project scope. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions. Our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. Additionally, the scope of our work specifically excludes the assessment of environmental characteristics, particularly those involving hazardous substances. We are not mold consultants nor are our recommendations to be interpreted as being preventative of mold development. A mold specialist should be consulted for all mold -related issues. This report has been prepared for planning and design purposes for specific application to the proposed project in accordance with the generally accepted standards of local practice at the time this report was written. No warranty, express or implied, is made. This report may be used only by the client and for the purposes stated, within a reasonable time from its issuance. Land use, site conditions (both off and on -site), or other factors including advances in our understanding of applied science, may change over time and could materially affect our findings. Therefore, this report should not be relied upon after 24 months from its issuance. PanGEO should be notified if the project is delayed by more than 24 months from the date of this report so that we may review the applicability of our conclusions considering the time lapse. 22-086 752 walnut St Geoxpt Page 16 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 It is the client's responsibility to see that all parties to this project, including the designer, contractor, subcontractors, etc., are made aware of this report in its entirety. The use of information contained in this report for bidding purposes should be done at the contractor's option and risk. Any party other than the client who wishes to use this report shall notify PanGEO of such intended use and for permission to copy this report. Based on the intended use of the report, PanGEO may require that additional work be performed and that an updated report be reissued. Noncompliance with any of these requirements will release PanGEO from any liability resulting from the use this report. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, PanGEO, Inc. ► ZyW C��-K,' Gam'�_La 0412612022 Chien -Lin (Johnny) Chen, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer Attachments: Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Site and Exploration Plan Appendix A — Summary Test Boring Logs Figure A-1 Terms and Symbols for Boring and Test Pit Logs Figure A-2 Log of Test Boring PG-1 Figure A-3 Log of Test Boring PG-2 Appendix B — Previous Test Boring Logs 22-086 752 walnut St Geoxpt Page 17 PanGEO, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report - Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA April 26, 2022 REFERENCES ASTM International (ASTM), 2021, Annual book of standards, Section 04.08 Soil and Rock (I): D420-D5876: West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. International Code Council, 2018, International Building Code (IBC). Minard, J.P., 1983, Geologic map of the Edmonds East and part of the Edmonds West Quadrangles, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF- 1541, scale 1:24000. City of Seattle, 2020, Standard Specifications for Road, Bridges, and Municipal Construction. South Fork Geosciences, PLLC, 2019, Williams Settlement Assessment, 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, Washington, dated December 20, 2019, Project No. 19081. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), 2022, Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction, M 41-10. Washington Administrative Code (WAC), 2021, Chapter 296-155 - Safety Standards for Construction Work, Part N - Excavation, Trenching, and Shoring, Olympia, Washington. 22-086 752 walnut St GeoRpt Page 18 PanGEO, Inc. .' `. �•r :` - - '{iJ�.-� - .1_; i _=�UT.-_ �N'N • •- Ott-F.U., P P—P 884522" W 5992' PLA eY •b_ v,I �RE13AR/CAP I....E tl —ww w—W W ENE./SE.j8 FB2 V EtE.J e'caNc.196sa• *% WD (6W PLAT) N 88.46'07' W 59.92' (60' PLAT) LEGEND: Approx. Test Boring Location - PanGEO, 2022 (Approx. Depth to Bearing Soil, ft) Approx. Previous Boring Location - South Fork Geosciences, 2019 FbnGEe Proposed Remodeling 752 Walnut Street I N C O R P O R A T E D Edmonds, Washington zo O yl j AO Z I • � wC 111 •' z.a J d - �11.9J t r'VC x.DD' NORTH SEr R®M/CM Approx. Scale: 1"=20' Note: Base map modified from Topographic & Boundary Survey by Terrane dated 08/03/2021 SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN Project No. Figure No. 22-086 2 APPENDIX A SUMMARY TEST BORING LOGS RELATIVE DENSITY / CONSISTENCY SAND / GRAVEL SILT / CLAY SPT Approx. Relative SPT Approx. Undrained Shear Density N-values Density (/o) Consistency N-values Strength (psf) Very Loose <4 <15 Very Soft <2 <250 Loose 4 to 10 15 - 35 Soft 2 to 4 250 - 500 Med. Dense 10 to 30 35 - 65 Med. Stiff 4 to 8 500 -1000 Dense 30 to 50 65 - 85 Stiff 8 to 15 1000 - 2000 Very Dense >50 85 -100 Very Stiff 15 to 30 2000 - 4000 Hard >30 >4000 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP DESCRIPTIONS •�' .. GW: Well -graded GRAVEL Gravel GRAVEL (<5% fines) .....: ...................................................... 50% or more of the coarse GP : Poorly -graded GRAVEL fraction retained on the #4 sieve. Use dual symbols leg. o D .....: GM: ...................................................... Silty GRAVEL GP -GM) for 5% to 12% fines. GRAVEL (>12% fines) •• GC : ...................................................... Clayey GRAVEL .......................................................... .............................................................. SW: Well -graded SAND Sand SAND (<5 /o fines) 50% or more of the coarse '' % SP : Poor/ raded SAND Poorly -graded fraction passing the #4 sieve. Use dual symbols leg. SP-SM) ..............................:....>.. " " ' ......................................................... SM : Silty SAND for 5% to 12% fines. ............................... SAND (>12% fines) ............................. ............................................................ SC : ............................................................ Clayey SAND ML : : SILT Liquid Limit < 50 CL : ............................................................ ...................................................... Lean CLAY Silt and Clay == _ OL : Organic SILT or CLAY 50%or more passing #200 sieve :.................................. .......................................................... MH : Elastic SILT Liquid Limit> 50 CH Fat CLAY OH Organic SILT or CLAY .......................... ...................................... HighlyOrganic Soils u ............................................................. PT : . PEAT Notes: 1. Soil exploration to s contain material descriptions based on visual observation and field tests using a system modified from the Uniform Soil Classification System (USCS). Where necessary laboratory tests have been conducted (as noted in the "Other Tests" column), unit descriptions may include a classification. Please refer to the discussions in the report text for a more complete description of the subsurface conditions. 2. The graphic symbols given above are not inclusive of all symbols that may appear on the borehole togs. Other symbols may be used where field observations indicated mixed soil constituents or dual constituent materials. DESCRIPTIONS OF SOIL STRUCTURES Layered: Units of material distinguished by color and/or Fissured: Breaks along defined planes composition from material units above and below Slickensided: Fracture planes that are polished or glossy Laminated: Layers of soil typically 0.05 to 1 mm thick, max.1 cm Blocky: Angular soil lumps that resist breakdown Lens: Layer of soil that pinches out laterally Disrupted: Soil that is broken and mixed Interlayered: Alternating layers of differing soil material Scattered: Less than one per foot Pocket: Erratic, discontinuous deposit of limited extent Numerous: More than one per foot Homogeneous: Soil with uniform color and composition throughout BCN: Angle between bedding plane and a plane normal to core axis COMPONENT DEFINITIONS COMPONENT SIZE / SIEVE RANGE COMPONENT SIZE / SIEVE RANGE Boulder: > 12 inches Sand Cobbles: 3 to 12 inches Coarse Sand: #4 to #10 sieve (4.5 to 2.0 mm) Gravel Medium Sand: #10 to #40 sieve (2.0 to 0.42 mm) Coarse Gravel: 3 to 3/4 inches Fine Sand: #40 to #200 sieve (0.42 to 0.074 mm) Fine Gravel: 3/4 inches to #4 sieve Silt 0.074 to 0.002 mm Clay <0.002 mm TEST SYMBOLS for In Situ and Laboratory Tests listed in "Other Tests" column. ATT Atterberg Limit Test Comp Compaction Tests Con Consolidation DID Dry Density DS Direct Shear %F Fines Content GS Grain Size Perm Permeability PP Pocket Penetrometer R R-value SG Specific Gravity TV Torvane TXC Triaxial Compression UCC Unconfined Compression Sample/In Situ test types and intervals 2-inch OD Split Spoon, SPT (140-lb. hammer, 30" drop) OD Spilt Spoon H3.25-inch (300-lb hammer, 30" drop) Non-standard penetration test (see boring log for details) Thin wall (Shelby) tube Grab Rock core ® Vane Shear MONITORING WELL SZ Groundwater Level at time of drilling (ATD) 1 Static Groundwater Level Cement / Concrete Seal Bentonite grout / seal Silica sand backfll Slotted tip Slough Bottom of Boring MOISTURE CONTENT Dry Dusty, dry to the touch Moist Damp but no visible water Wet Visible free water PanGE@) Terms and Symbols for I N C O R P O R A T E D Boring and Test Pit Logs Figure A-1 Phone: 206.262.0370 Project: Proposed Remodeling Surface Elevation: 212.Oft Job Number: 22-086 Top of Casing Elev.: N/A Location: 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA Drilling Method: HSA Coordinates: Northing: 47.80702, Easting:-122.36987 Sampling Method: SPT N-Value A o Z T C: U) p PL Moisture LL Q a ; ~ E MATERIAL DESCRIPTION p E U) 1= U) El Recovery 0 0 50 100 0 3 Loose, mixed dark and orange -brown, slightly silty and gravelly SAND; moist; poorly graded, iron oxide staining, trace debris, disturbed S-1 3 appearance [Fill]. 4 2 1 --becomes very loose with trace organics. S-2 0 1 4 28 Dense, gray -brown, sandy GRAVEL; wet; poorly graded, blow count likely inflated by gravel [Qva - Vashon Advance Outwash]. S-3 16 o'•D: 6 19 17 o'•D: 8 S-4 6 _____________________________ Medium dense, gray, slightly gravelly, silt SAND; wet; poorly graded Qva 9 Y 9 Y 9 Y Y p� Y 9 [ Vashon Advance Outwash]. 7 Boring terminated at about 9 feet below ground surface due to practical drilling refusal on cobble. Groundwater was observed at about 5 feet depth 10 during drilling. 12 14 16 Completion Depth: 9.0ft Remarks: Boring drilled using an acker portable drill rig. Standard penetration test (SPT) Date Borehole Started: 3/13/22 sampler driven with a 140 lb. safety hammer. Hammer operated with a rope and cathead Date Borehole Completed: 3/13/22 mechanism. Surface elevation estimated from Topographic & Boundary Survey by Terrane Logged By: B. Weitering dated 08/03/2021. Drilling Company: CN Drilling PmGEE) LOG OF TEST BORING PG-1 I N C O R P O R A T E D Figure A-2 The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 Of 1 Project: Proposed Remodeling Surface Elevation: 207.Oft Job Number: 22-086 Top of Casing Elev.: N/A Location: 752 Walnut Street, Edmonds, WA Drilling Method: HSA Coordinates: Northing: 47.807, Easting:-122.36968 Sampling Method: SPT N-Value A o Z T C (n p PL Moisture LL Q a ; ~ E MATERIAL DESCRIPTION p E U) 1= U) 0 El Recovery 0 50 100 0 6 _2"Asphalt Driveway. -------------------- S-1 6 Medium dense, mixed gray -brown, orange -brown, and brown, slightly silty and gravelly SAND; moist; poorly graded, trace organics [Fill]. Medium dense, gray- and orange -brown, SAND interlayered with gravelly 5 SAND to sandy GRAVEL; moist; poorly graded, iron oxide staining [Qva - 2 Vashon Advance Outwash]. --becomes wet. 7 a:.:•:. ° .. N. S-2 12 14 .' 4 4 :o:•:'•.'. —3" heave, sampled through. a:.:•:. S-3 12 6 ° .. 14 .•�. s 10 --2' heave, removed. ° S-4 15 .. Boring terminated at about 11.5 feet below ground surface due to practical 12 drilling refusal in heave. Groundwater was observed at about 2 feet depth during drilling. 14 16 Completion Depth: 11.5ft Remarks: Boring drilled using an acker portable drill rig. Standard penetration test (SPT) Date Borehole Started: 3/13/22 sampler driven with a 140 lb. safety hammer. Hammer operated with a rope and cathead Date Borehole Completed: 3/13/22 mechanism. Surface elevation estimated from Topographic & Boundary Survey by Terrane Logged By: B. Weitering dated 08/03/2021. Drilling Company: CN Drilling PmGEE) LOG OF TEST BORING PG-2 i N C U R P O R A T E D Figure A-3 The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries. The transition may be gradual. Sheet 1 Of 1 APPENDIX B PREVIOUS TEST BORING LOGS Williams Settlement Assessment 752 Walnut Street Edmonds, Washington Soil Exploration Locations SOUTH FORK GEOSCIENCES, PLLC PC) Box 1 275 NORTH BEND, WA 98045 425-89❑-4858 1 INF00-SFGEQ.00M December 20, 2019 Project #19081 Source: Google Maps South Fork Geosciences LOG OF BORING B-1 P❑ Box 1275, North Bend, WA 98045 info@Sfgeo.Com (Page 1 of 1 ) Williams Settlement Assessment Date Started 12-20-2019 Drilling Co. Geologic Drill Partners 752 Walnut Street. Date Completed 12-20-2019 Driller Name . Jeremy Coleman Edmonds, Washington Hole Diameter 6" oD, 2112" ID Start Time 0846 SFG #19081 Drllling Method HSA Mini Track End Time 0940 Sampling Method . Split Spoon Lagged By Andrew Glandon, LEG � Z C 7 a DESCRIPTION 81aw Count Graph REMARKS a rn C�0 r° m ❑ 2Q d❑ 6U 6 4 Hand dug to 2.5ft 0-6" - hark mulch, 6"-2.5ft - moist, light brown fine to Full recovery unless noted sp medium SAND with gravel (SP) otherwise No recovery SPT 3-5 -1 6. No Recovery SP 4- 5 saturated, brown fine to coarse SAND with gravel SPT 1-1-0=1 2 sw (SW) 1 3 saturated, brown fine to coarse SAND with fine gravel, 3" zone of organic silt mid sample (SW) s SPT 2-3-6=9 svu sw . Water at 8 feet after drilling 10 saturated, hrwon Fine to coarse SAND with gravel SPT 12-25-28=53 4 SQ-SM . (SW) 53 H saturated, brown fine to coarse SAND (SW) SPT 17-17-7=24 5 SW 24 15 p wet to saturated, brown fine to coarse SAND with SPT 23-23-23=46 afine gravel (SW) 46 N sw 20 SPT 11-15-20=35 'I saturated, gray fine to medium SAND with fine gravel 7 sP L (SP) - possible older unit based on color and 35 apparent difference in provenance Total Depth = 21.5 feet Water at 9 feet bgs after drilling Boring backfilled with hentonite chips 25 South Fork Geosciences LOG OF BORING B-2 PO Box 1275, North Bend, WA 98045 info@sfgeo.com (Page 1 of 1) Williams Settlement Assessment Date Started 12-20-2019 Drilling Co. Geologic Drill Partners 752 Walnut Street Date Completed 12-20-2019 Driller Name - Jeremy Coleman Edmonds, Washington Hole Diameter 6" QD, 2 112" ID Start Time 0945 SFG #19081 Drilling Method i HSA Mini Track End Time 1030 Sampling Method : Split Spoon Logged By Andrew Glandon, LEG m U_ rl U c m n C E < o DESCRIPTION n rn c�LL Cuttings moist, brown fine to coarse SAND with gravel (SW) SP Bark mulch in sampler, no soil recovery SP 5-wet " to saturated, brown fine to coarse SAND with 2 $vV-SPI.: gravel and silt (SP 5M) saturated, brown -gray fine to coarse SAND with 3 SW -so gravel and silt (SW-SM) 10 ° Blow Count U o Graph m p 2D 40 so 6 15 3 swroL::: saturated, brown fine to coarse SAND with gravel, 4 zone of organic silt in middle of sample approximately 10 4" thick (SWIOL) SWrOL . wet to saturated, brown -gray fine to coarse SAND, n5 H trace gravel (SW) 22 O "IF1 f 25 Total Depth = 20 feet Rod was bound up due to heaving sands Water at 4 feet after drilling Boring backfilled with bentonite chips 29 14=11M►I122M Full recovery unless noted otherwise SPT 4-3-3=6 No Recovery Water at 4 feet after driving SPT 3-6-9=15 SPT 4-2-1=3, 1)3 recovery SPT 5-5-5=10 SPT 8-9-13=22 SPT 11-12-17=29 South Fork Geosciences LOG OF BORING B-3 PO Box 1275. North Bend, WA 98045 info@sfgeo.com (Page 1 of 1) Williams Settlement Assessment Date Started 1 Z-20-2019 drilling Ca. Geologic Drill Partners 752 Walnut Street Date Completed 12-20-20'19 driller Name Jeremy Coleman Edmonds, Washington Hole Diameter 6' fl0, 2 IQ` ID Stan Time 1040 SFG #19081 Drilling Method HSA Mini Track End Time 1120 Sampling Method 5plil Spoon Logged By Andrew Gfandon, LEG m LL r 0.1 _ Blow Count u U �, DESCRIPTION 3 Graph REMARKS CL a E to in (5 L L m 0 20 40 50 9 Q Cuttings moist, brown fine to coarse SAND with gravel (SW) Full recovery unless noted Sw otherwise moist, light brawn fine to coarse SAND, SPT 2-2-2=4, 213 recovery 1 sw predominantly medium sand {SW) a Water at 5 feet after drilling 5— moist, black -brown gray fine to medium SAND with SPT 4-6 4=10 2 U. gravel and silt, charcoal/wood debris present 14 SP-SM. ` r .} (SP-SM) saturated, brown -gray fine to medium SAND with sPT 2-0-2:--2 3 sp-SM gravel and silt (SP-SM) 2 10 saturated, brown fine to medium SAND (SP) SPT 4-4-7=11 4 SP 11 SP saturated. brown -gray fuse to coarse SAND with fine SPT 9-B-10=1 B gravel (SW) 1B 5 sw � SPT 11-14.20=34 g 34 C r N > No SPT {Heavey saturated. gray fine to medium SAND (SP) 7 SP 0 20-- Total Depth = 20 feet Drilled to 20 feet, encountered 2 feet of heave Water at 5 feet after drilling Baring backfilled with bentonite chips 25