Loading...
REVIEWED BLD2023-0917+Calculations+7.4.2023_10.05.12_AM+3646613RECEIVED BLD2023-0917 Jul 24 2023 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Structural Calculations Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction 17001 6811 Avenue West Edmonds, WA 98026 The following documentation shall be available on .REVIEWED. ■ site for the building inspector: ; BY CITY OF EDMONDS ■ ■ BUILDING DEPARTMENT; ■ - """"""""""""""""""""""" ; X❑ COE APPROVED ARCHITECTURAL PLAN SET = ALL WORK SUBJECT : ❑ COE APPROVED STRUCTURAL PLAN SET TO FIELD INSPECTION FOR X❑ COE REVIEWED CALCULATION PACKET CODE COMPLIANCE ; ❑ENERGY CREDIT WORKSHEET ■ ❑ SITE PLAN ; ■ ❑ CIVIL PLAN - ❑ = ■ �❑ - ■ CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2021 ■ Franklin Pacific Structural LLC Mukilteo, Washington t: 206.734-6971 Project Information Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Project Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Address 17001 68' Avenue West Edmonds, Wa 98026 Job No Designer Justin J Franklin Date 06-03-23 Scope: Gravity and lateral load analysis and design for wood framed residential deck. Building Information: Occupancy Class: R-3 Construction Type: V-B Referenced Building Code and Specifications, Product Guides and Manuals Design Code: 2021 International Building Code Design Specifications: ASCE 7-16 ACI 318-14 NDS and SDPWS — 2018 Edition Product Manuals: 2019-2020 Simpson Wood Construction Connectors Project Notes: Table of Contents: 1 Gravity load analysis and design for deck framing 2 Gravity load analysis and design for foundations 3 Lateral load analysis and design for railing Seal Justin J Franklin 1 Deck Framing Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Project Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Job No Designer Justin J Franklin Date 06-03-23 Pages Scope: Analysis and design of deck framing. Design Information: Deck Dead Load = 10 psf Deck Live Load = 60 psf Design Notes: Load Combination (IBC 1605.3.1) D+F D+H+F+L D+H+F+(Lr or S or R) D+H+F+0.75(L)+0.75(Lr or S or R) D+H+F+(0.6W or 0.7E) D+H+F+0.75(0.6W)+ 0.75L+0.75(Lr or S or R) D+H+F+0.75(0.7E)+ 0.75L+0.75S 0.6D+0.6W+H 0.6(D+F)+0.7E+H I 1 Deck Framing Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Deck Framing Elements B1 C1 B2 �412 6K12 Bx12 a r J2 e2°9a l 3 31"-1" VIF 374 (E) W2270 REMAIN" r r r N O 22'-10j�" V!F Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Joist 1 CODE REFERENCES Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set: IBC 2021 Material Properties Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Load Combination IBC 2021 Wood Species Douglas Fir -Larch Wood Grade No.2 Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral -torsional buckling Fb + 900.0 psi E : Modulus of Elasticity Fb - 900.0 psi Ebend- xx 1,600.0ksi Fc - Prll 1,350.0 psi Eminbend - xx 580.Oksi Fc - Perp 625.0 psi Fv 180.0 psi Ft 575.0 psi Density 31.210pcf D(0.0133) L(0.0798) D(0.0133) 1_(0.0798) 2x10 Span = 9.750 ft 2x10 Span = 2.250 ft pplied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Load for Span Number 1 Uniform Load : D = 0.010, L = 0.060 ksf, Tributary Width = 1.330 ft, (tributary deck loading) Load for Span Number 2 Uniform Load : D = 0.010, L = 0.060 ksf, Tributary Width = 1.330 ft, (tributary deck loading) DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending Stress Ratio Section used for this span fb: Actual F'b Load Combination Location of maximum on span Span # where maximum occurs Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection Max Upward Transient Deflection Max Downward Total Deflection Max Upward Total Deflection = 0.702 1 2x10 556.27 psi 792.00 psi +D+L 4.630 ft Span # 1 0.095 in Ratio = -0.060 in Ratio = 0.111 in Ratio = -0.070 in Ratio = Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations Maximum Shear Stress Ratio Section used for this span fv: Actual F'v Load Combination Location of maximum on span Span # where maximum occurs 1231 > 360 Span: 1 : L Only 902> 360 Span: 2: L Only 1055 -180 Span: 1 : +D+L 774 > 180 Span: 2: +D+L = 0.306 : 1 2x10 = 44.00 psi = 144.00 psi +D+L = 8.987 ft Span # 1 Load Combination Max Stress Ratios Moment Values Shear Values Segment Length Span # M V CD CM Ct CLx CF Cfu C i C r M fb F'b V fv F'v D Only 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 9.750 ft 1 0.111 0.049 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.14 79.5 712.8 0.06 6.3 129.6 Length = 2.250 ft 2 0.026 0.049 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.03 18.9 712.8 0.02 6.3 129.6 +D+L 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 9.750 ft 1 0.702 0.306 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.99 556.3 792.0 0.41 44.0 144.0 Length = 2.250 ft 2 0.167 0.306 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.24 132.2 792.0 0.14 44.0 144.0 +D+0.750L 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 9.750 ft 1 0.441 0.192 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.78 437.1 990.0 0.32 34.6 180.0 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Joist 1 Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations Load Combination Max Stress Ratios Moment Values Shear Values Segment Length Span # M V CD CM Ct CLx CF Cfu C i C r M fb F'b V fv F'v Length = 2.250 ft 2 0.105 0.192 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.19 103.9 990.0 0.11 34.6 180.0 +0.60D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 9.750 ft 1 0.038 0.016 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.08 47.7 1,267.2 0.03 3.8 230.4 Length = 2.250 ft 2 0.009 0.016 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.02 11.3 1,267.2 0.01 3.8 230.4 Overall Maximum Deflections Load Combination Span Max. "-" Deft Location in Span Load Combination Max. °+° Deft Location in Span +D+L 1 0.1109 4.793 0.0000 0.000 2 0.0000 4.793 +D+L-0.0697 2.250 Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 Support 3 Max Upward from all Load Conditions 0.430 0.688 Max Upward from Load Combinations 0.430 0.688 Max Upward from Load Cases 0.368 0.589 D Only 0.061 0.098 +D+L 0.430 0.688 +D+0.750L 0.338 0.540 +0.60D 0.037 0.059 L Only 0.368 0.589 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Joist 2 CODE REFERENCES Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set: IBC 2021 Material Properties Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Load Combination IBC 2021 Wood Species Douglas Fir -Larch Wood Grade No.2 Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral -torsional buckling Fb + 900.0 psi E : Modulus of Elasticity Fb - 900.0 psi Ebend- xx 1,600.0ksi Fc - Prll 1,350.0 psi Eminbend - xx 580.Oksi Fc - Perp 625.0 psi Fv 180.0 psi Ft 575.0 psi Density 31.210pcf D(0.0133) L(0.0798) D(0.0133) L(0.0798) 2x10 Span = 9.750 ft pplied Loads Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Load for Span Number 1 Span = 4.50 ft Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Uniform Load : D = 0.010, L = 0.060 ksf, Tributary Width = 1.330 ft, (tributary deck loading) Load for Span Number 2 Uniform Load : D = 0.010, L = 0.060 ksf, Tributary Width = 1.330 ft, (tributary deck loading) DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending Stress Ratio Section used for this span fb: Actual F'b Load Combination Location of maximum on span Span # where maximum occurs Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection Max Upward Transient Deflection Max Downward Total Deflection Max Upward Total Deflection = 0.66& 1 2x10 528.81 psi 792.00 psi +D+L 9.750 ft Span # 1 0.054 in Ratio = -0.002 in Ratio = 0.063 in Ratio = -0.002 in Ratio = Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations Maximum Shear Stress Ratio Section used for this span fv: Actual F'v Load Combination Location of maximum on span Span # where maximum occurs 2150> 360 Span: 2: L Only 63830 -360 Span: 2: L Only 1843 > 180 Span: 2: +D+L 54710 > 180 Span: 2: +D+L 0.360 : 1 2x10 = 51.84 psi = 144.00 psi +D+L = 8.987 ft Span # 1 Load Combination Max Stress Ratios Moment Values Shear Values Segment Length Span # M V CD CM Ct CLx CIF Cfu C i C r M fb F'b V fv F'v D Only 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 9.750 ft 1 0.106 0.057 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.13 75.5 712.8 0.07 7.4 129.6 Length = 4.50 ft 2 0.106 0.057 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.13 75.5 712.8 0.05 7.4 129.6 +D+L 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 9.750 ft 1 0.668 0.360 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.94 528.8 792.0 0.48 51.8 144.0 Length = 4.50 ft 2 0.668 0.360 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.94 528.8 792.0 0.35 51.8 144.0 +D+0.750L 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 9.750 ft 1 0.420 0.226 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.74 415.5 990.0 0.38 40.7 180.0 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Joist 2 Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations Load Combination Max Stress Ratios Moment Values Shear Values Segment Length Span # M V CD CM Ct CLx CF Cfu C i C r M fb F'b V fv F'v Length = 4.50 ft 2 0.420 0.226 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.74 415.5 990.0 0.27 40.7 180.0 +0.60D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 9.750 ft 1 0.036 0.019 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.08 45.3 1,267.2 0.04 4.4 230.4 Length = 4.50 ft 2 0.036 0.019 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.08 45.3 1,267.2 0.03 4.4 230.4 Overall Maximum Deflections Load Combination Span Max. "-" Deft Location in Span Load Combination Max. °+° Deft Location in Span +D+L 1 0.0635 4.303 0.0000 0.000 +D+L 2 0.0271 4.500 +D+L-0.0020 0.679 Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 Support 3 Max Upward from all Load Conditions 0.357 0.969 Max Upward from Load Combinations 0.357 0.969 Max Upward from Load Cases 0.306 0.831 D Only 0.051 0.138 +D+L 0.357 0.969 +D+0.750L 0.281 0.762 +0.60D 0.031 0.083 L Only 0.306 0.831 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Beam 1 CODE REFERENCES Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set: IBC 2021 Material Properties Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Fb + 900.0 psi E : Modulus of Elasticity Load Combination IBC 2021 Fb - 900.0 psi Ebend- xx 1,600.0ksi Fc - Prll 1,350.0 psi Eminbend - xx 580.Oksi Wood Species Douglas Fir -Larch Fc - Perp 625.0 psi Wood Grade No.2 Fv 180.0 psi Ft 575.0 psi Density 31.210pcf Beam Bracing Beam is Fully Braced against lateral -torsional buckling D(0.138) L(0.831) D(0.098) L(0.589) D(0.098) 1_(0.589) 6x12 6x12 Span = 1.750 ft Span = 7.250 ft Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Beam self weight calculated and added to loading Load for Span Number 1 Uniform Load : D = 0.0980, L = 0.5890 , Tributary Width = 1.0 ft, (Joist Reaction) Load for Span Number 2 Uniform Load : D = 0.0980, L = 0.5890 k/ft, Extent = 0.0 --» 5.0 ft, Tributary Width = 1.0 ft, (Joist Reaction) Uniform Load : D = 0.1380, L = 0.8310 k/ft, Extent = 5.0 --» 7.250 ft, Tributary Width = 1.0 ft, (Joist Reaction) DESIGN SUMMARY • Maximum Bending Stress Ratio = 0.614 1 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = 0.351 : 1 Section used for this span 6x12 Section used for this span 6x12 fb: Actual = 442.23psi fv: Actual = 50.60 psi F'b = 720.00psi F'v = 144.00 psi Load Combination +D+L Load Combination +D+L Location of maximum on span = 3.969ft Location of maximum on span = 1.750 ft Span # where maximum occurs = Span # 2 Span # where maximum occurs = Span # 1 Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.033 in Ratio = 2628> 360 Span: 2: L Only Max Upward Transient Deflection -0.021 in Ratio = 1966 > 360 Span: 1 : L Only Max Downward Total Deflection 0.039 in Ratio = 2213 -180 Span: 2: +D+L Max Upward Total Deflection -0.025 in Ratio = 1656 -180 Span: 1 : +D+L Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations Load Combination Max Stress Ratios Moment Values Shear a ues Segment Length Span # M V CD CM Ct CLx CF Cfu C i Cr M fb F'b V fv F'v D Only Length = 1.750 ft Length = 7.250 ft +D+L Length = 1.750 ft Length = 7.250 ft +D+0.750L 1 0.026 0.062 0.90 2 0.108 0.062 0.90 1 0.148 0.351 1.00 2 0.614 0.351 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.17 16.9 648.0 0.34 8.0 129.6 0.71 69.8 648.0 0.34 8.0 129.6 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 1.07 106.2 720.0 2.13 50.6 144.0 4.47 442.2 720.0 2.13 50.6 144.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Beam 1 Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations Load Combination Max Stress Ratios Moment Values Shear Values Segment Length Span # M V CD CM Ct CLx CF Cfu C i C r M fb F'b V fv F'v Length = 1.750 ft 1 0.093 0.222 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.85 83.9 900.0 1.68 40.0 180.0 Length = 7.250 ft 2 0.388 0.222 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 3.53 349.1 900.0 1.68 40.0 180.0 +0.60D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 1.750 ft 1 0.009 0.021 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.10 10.2 1,152.0 0.20 4.8 230.4 Length = 7.250 ft 2 0.036 0.021 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.42 41.9 1,152.0 0.20 4.8 230.4 Overall Maximum Deflections Load Combination Span 1 +D+L 2 Vertical Reactions Max. "-" Deft Location in Span Load Combination Max. °+° Deft Location in Span 0.0000 0.000 +D+L-0.0254 0.000 0.0393 3.767 0.0000 0.000 Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 Support 3 Max Upward from all Load Conditions 4.013 2.928 Max Upward from Load Combinations 4.013 2.928 Max Upward from Load Cases 3.375 2.471 D Only 0.638 0.457 +D+L 4.013 2.928 +D+0.750L 3.169 2.310 +0.60D 0.383 0.274 L Only 3.375 2.471 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Beam 2 CODE REFERENCES Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set: IBC 2021 Material Properties Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Fb + 900.0 psi E : Modulus of Elasticity Load Combination IBC 2021 Fb - 900.0 psi Ebend- xx 1,600.0ksi Fc - Prll 1,350.0 psi Eminbend - xx 580.Oksi Wood Species Douglas Fir -Larch Fc - Perp 625.0 psi Wood Grade No.2 Fv 180.0 psi Ft 575.0 psi Density 31.210pcf Beam Bracing Beam is Fully Braced against lateral -torsional buckling D(0.098) L(0.589) D(0.138) L(0.831) 6x 12 Span = 8.50 ft Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Beam self weight calculated and added to loading Load for Span Number 1 Uniform Load : D = 0.1380, L = 0.8310 k/ft, Extent = 0.0 - > 7.250 ft, Tributary Width = 1.0 ft, (Joist Reacion) Uniform Load : D = 0.0980, L = 0.5890 k/ft, Extent = 7.250 -->> 8.50 ft, Tributary Width = 1.0 ft, (Joist Reaction) DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending Stress Ratio = 0.964 1 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = 0.426 : 1 Section used for this span 6x12 Section used for this span 6x12 fb: Actual = 867.64psi fv: Actual = 76.74 psi F'b = 900.00psi F'v = 180.00 psi Load Combination +D+L Load Combination +D+L Location of maximum on span = 4.219ft Location of maximum on span = 0.000 ft Span # where maximum occurs = Span # 1 Span # where maximum occurs = Span # 1 Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.087 in Ratio = 1 176 > 360 Span: 1 : L Only Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio = 0 <360 n/a Max Downward Total Deflection 0.103 in Ratio = 994 > 180 Span: 1 : +D+L Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in Ratio = 0 <180 n/a Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations Load Combination iwax stress ratios moment values snear values Segment Length Span # M V CD CM Ct CLx CIF Cfu C i C r M fb F'b V fv F'v D Only 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 8.50 ft 1 0.166 0.073 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.35 134.1 810.0 0.50 11.9 162.0 +D+L 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 8.50 ft 1 0.964 0.426 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 8.77 867.6 900.0 3.24 76.7 180.0 +D+0.750L 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 8.50 ft 1 0.608 0.269 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 6.91 684.2 1,125.0 2.55 60.5 225.0 +0.60D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 8.50 ft 1 0.056 0.025 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 80.4 1,440.0 0.30 7.1 288.0 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 LIC# : KW-06013278, Build:20.23.2.14 Franklin Pacific Structural LLC (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2022 DESCRIPTION: Beam 2 Overall Maximum Deflections Load Combination Span Max. "" Defl Location in Span Load Combination Max. "+" Defl Location in Span +D+L 1 0.1026 4.250 0.0000 0.000 Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 Max Upward from all Load Conditions 4.151 3.850 Max Upward from Load Combinations 4.151 3.850 Max Upward from Load Cases 3.510 3.251 D Only 0.641 0.598 +D+L 4.151 3.850 +D+0.750L 3.273 3.037 +0.60D 0.385 0.359 L Only 3.510 3.251 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Column Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Column 1 Code References Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combinations Used : IBC 2021 General Information Analysis Method Allowable Stress Design Wood Section Name 4x6 End Fixities Top & Bottom Pinned Wood Grading/Manuf. Graded Lumber Overall Column Height 8 ft Wood Member Type Sawn ( Used for non -slender calculations) Exact Width 3.in Allow Stress Modification Factors Wood Species Douglas Fir -Larch Exact Depth 5250 in Cf or Cv for Bending 1.0 Wood Grade No.2 .250 Area 19.25 inA2 Cf or Cv for Compressioi 1.0 Fb + 900.0 psi Fv 180.0 psi Ix 266.93 in^4 Cf or Cv for Tension 1.0 Fb - 900.0 psi Ft 575.0 psi ly 68.78 in^4 Cm : Wet Use Factor 1.0 Fc - PrII 1,350.0 psi Density 31.210 pcf Incising Factors : Ct : Temperature Fact 1.0 Fc - Perp 625.0 psi for Bending 0.80 Cfu :Flat Use Factor 1.0 E : Modulus of Elasticity ... x-x Bending y-y Bending Axial for Elastic Modulus 0.95 Kf : Built-up columns 1.0 NDS 15.3.2 Basic 1,600.0 1,600.0 1,600.0ksi Use Cr: Repetitive ? No Minimum 580.0 580.0 Brace condition for deflection (buckling) along columns : X-X (width) axis: Unbraced Length for buckling ABOUT Y-Y Axis = 8 ft, K Y-Y (depth) axis: Unbraced Length for buckling ABOUT X-X Axis = 8 ft, K Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Column self weight included : 33.377 Ibs * Dead Load Factor AXIAL LOADS ... Beam 1 Reaction: Axial Load at 8.0 ft, D = 0.4570, L = 2.471 k Beam 2 Reaction: Axial Load at 8.0 ft, D = 0.6410, L = 3.510 k DESIGN SUMMARY Bending & Shear Check Results PASS Max. Axial+Bending Stress Ratio = 0.8704 : 1 Maximum SERVICE Lateral Load Reactions. . Load Combination +D+L Top along Y-1 0.0 k Bottom along Y-Y 0.0 k Governing NDS Forumla Comp Only, fc/Fc' Top along X-� 0.0 k Bottom along X-X 0.0 k Location of max.above base 0.0 ft Maximum SERVICE Load Lateral Deflections ... At maximum location values are . Along Y-Y 0.0 in at 0.0 ft above base Applied Axial 7.112 k for load combination : n/a Applied Mx 0.0 k-ft Applied My 0.0 k-ft Along X-X 0.0 in at 0.0 ft above base Fc: Allowable 444.711 psi for load combination : n/a Other Factors used to calculate allowable stresses .. . PASS Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = 0.0 : 1 Bendina Compression Tension Load Combination +0.60D Location of max.above base 8.0 ft Applied Design Shear 0.0 psi Allowable Shear 230.40 psi Load Combination Results Maximum Axial + Bending Stress Ratios Maximum Shear Ratios Load Combination C D CP Stress Ratio Status Location Stress Ratio Status Location D Only 0.900 0.449 0.1412 PASS 0.0 ft 0.0 PASS 8.0 ft +D+L 1.000 0.412 0.8704 PASS 0.0 ft 0.0 PASS 8.0 ft +D+0.750L 1.250 0.340 0.6652 PASS 0.0 ft 0.0 PASS 8.0 ft +0.60D 1.600 0.273 0.07834 PASS 0.0 ft 0.0 PASS 8.0 ft Maximum Reactions Note: Only non -zero reactions are listed. X-X Axis Reaction k Y-Y Axis Reaction Axial Reaction My - End Moments k-ft Mx - End Moments Load Combination @ Base @ Top @ Base @ Top @ Base @ Base @ Top @ Base @ Top +D+L 7.112 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Woof) Column --AL Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Column 1 Maximum Reactions Note: Only non -zero reactions are listed. X-X Axis Reaction k Y-Y Axis Reaction Axial Reaction My - End Moments k-ft Mx - End Moments Load Combination @ Base @ Top @ Base @ Top @ Base @ Base @ Top @ Base @ Top +D+0.750L 5.617 +0.60D 0.679 L Only 5.981 Maximum Deflections for Load Combinations Load Combination Max. X-X Deflection Distance Max. Y-Y Deflection Distance D Only 0.0000 in 0.000ft 0.000 in 0.000ft +D+L 0.0000 in 0.000ft 0.000 in 0.000ft +D+0.750L 0.0000 in 0.000ft 0.000 in 0.000ft +0.60D 0.0000 in 0.000ft 0.000 in 0.000ft L Only 0.0000 in 0.000ft 0.000 in 0.000ft Sketches C 0 LO N L6 a +^ 8.888k 2 Deck Foundation Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Project Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Job No Designer Justin J Franklin Date 06-03-23 Pages Scope: Analysis and design of deck foundations. Design Information: Allowable Soil Pressure = 2000 psf Based on table 1804.2 soil class 4 Design Notes: Load Combination (IBC 1605.3.1.) D+F D+H+F+L D+H+F+(Lr or S or R) D+H+F+0.75(L)+0.75(Lr or S or R) D+H+F+(0.6W or 0.75E) D+H+F+0.75(0.6W)+0.75L+0.75(Lr or S or R) D+H+F+0.75(0.7E)+0.75L+0.75S 0.6D+0.6W+H 0.6(D+F)+0.7E+H 2 Deck Foundation Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Foundation Elements 2,0y" Y<<"VEF T-3}z'ViF B'd'VIF 8'-'Ji':'vI' tr-a"VIF t4'-3yz"VIF VIF F4 F1 F-F.71 J-1 F� L. L�J 2-1 F. � - a �f EXISTING FOOTING TO REMAEN ��f Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck General Footing Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Footing 1 Code References Calculations per ACI 318-14, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combinations Used : IBC 2021 General Information Material Properties f'c : Concrete 28 day strength = fy : Rebar Yield = Ec : Concrete Elastic Modulus = Concrete Density = (P Values Flexure = Shear = Analysis Settings Min Steel % Bending Reinf. Min Allow % Temp Reinf. Min. Overturning Safety Factor Min. Sliding Safety Factor Add Ftg Wt for Soil Pressure Use ftg wt for stability, moments & shears Add Pedestal Wt for Soil Pressure Use Pedestal wt for stability, mom & shear Dimensions Width parallel to X-X Axis = Length parallel to Z-Z Axis = Footing Thickness = Pedestal dimensions... px : parallel to X-X Axis pz : parallel to Z-Z Axis =_ Height Rebar Centerline to Edge of Concrete... at Bottom of footing = Reinforcing Bars parallel to X-X Axis Number of Bars Reinforcing Bar Size = # Bars parallel to Z-Z Axis Number of Bars = Reinforcing Bar Size = # Bandwidth Distribution Check (AC I 15.4.4.2) Direction Requiring Closer Separation # Bars required within zone # Bars required on each side of zone plied Loads Soil Design Values 2.50 ksi Allowable Soil Bearing = 2.0 ksf 60.0 ksi Soil Density = 110.0 pcf 3,122.0 ksi Increase Bearing By Footing Weight = No 150.0 pcf Soil Passive Resistance (for Sliding) = 250.0 pcf 0.90 Soil/Concrete Friction Coeff. = 0.30 0.750 Increases based on footing Depth Footing base depth below soil surface = ft = Allow press. increase per foot of depth = ksf = 0.00180 when footing base is below = ft = 1.0:1 = 1.0 : 1 Increases based on footing plan dimension Yes Allowable pressure increase per foot of depth Yes = ksf Yes when max. length or width is greater than = ft No 2.0 ft 2.0 ft 10.0 in 6.0 in 6.0 in 6.0 in 3.0 in 3.0 4 3.0 4 X 0 N 3-#4Bars M X-X Section Looking to +Z Z X p3m, 0 N Q) m w 3-#4Bars 10 co -- Z-Z Section Looking to +X D Lr L S W E H P : Column Load = 1.131 5.981 k OB : Overburden = ksf M-xx = k-ft M-zz = k-ft V-x = k V-z = k Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck General Footing Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Footing 1 DESIGN SUMMARY Min. Ratio Item Applied Capacity Governing Load Combination PASS Soil Bearing ksf ksf PASS Z Flexure (+X) k-ft/ft k-ft/ft PASS Z Flexure (-X) k-ft/ft k-ft/ft PASS X Flexure (+Z) k-ft/ft k-ft/ft PASS X Flexure (-Z) k-ft/ft k-ft/ft PASS 1-way Shear (+X) psi psi PASS 1-way Shear (-X) psi psi PASS 1-way Shear (+Z) psi psi PASS 1-way Shear (-Z) psi psi PASS 2-way Punching psi psi Detailed Results Soil Bearing Rotation Axis & Xecc Zecc Actual Soil Bearing Stress @ Location Actual / Allow Load Combination... Gross Allowable (in) Bottom, -Z Top, +Z Left, -X Right, +X Ratio X-X, D Only 2.0 n/a 0.0 0.4124 0.4124 n/a n/a 0.206 X-X, +D+L 2.0 n/a 0.0 1.908 1.908 n/a n/a 0.954 X-X, +D+0.750L 2.0 n/a 0.0 1.534 1.534 n/a n/a 0.767 X-X, +0.60D 2.0 n/a 0.0 0.2475 0.2475 n/a n/a 0.124 Z-Z, D Only 2.0 0.0 n/a n/a n/a 0.4124 0.4124 0.206 Z-Z, +D+L 2.0 0.0 n/a n/a n/a 1.908 1.908 0.954 Z-Z, +D+0.750L 2.0 0.0 n/a n/a n/a 1.534 1.534 0.767 Z-Z, +0.60D 2.0 0.0 n/a n/a n/a 0.2475 0.2475 0.124 Overturning Stability Rotation Axis & Load Combination... Overturning Moment Resisting Moment Stability Ratio Status Footing Has NO Overturning Sliding Stability All units k Force Application Axis Load Combination... Sliding Force Resisting Force Stability Ratio Status Footing Has NO Sliding Footing Flexure Flexure Axis & Load Combination Mu Side Tension As Req'd Gvrn. As Actual As Phi*Mn Status k-ft Surface in^2 in^2 in^2 k-ft X-X, +1.40D 0.1132 +Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK X-X, +1.40D 0.1132 -Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK X-X, +1.20D+1.60L 0.7697 +Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK X-X, +1.20D+1.60L 0.7697 -Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK X-X, +1.20D+0.50L 0.3072 +Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK X-X, +1.20D+0.50L 0.3072 -Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK X-X, +1.20D 0.09699 +Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK X-X, +1.20D 0.09699 -Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK X-X, +0.90D 0.07275 +Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK X-X, +0.90D 0.07275 -Z Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Z-Z, +1.40D 0.1132 -X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Z-Z, +1.40D 0.1132 +X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Z-Z, +1.20D+1.60L 0.7697 -X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Z-Z, +1.20D+1.60L 0.7697 +X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Z-Z, +1.20D+0.50L 0.3072 -X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Z-Z, +1.20D+0.50L 0.3072 +X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Z-Z, +1.20D 0.09699 -X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck General Footing Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 LIC# : KW-06013278, Build:20.23.2.14 Franklin Pacific Structural LLC (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2022 DESCRIPTION: Footing 1 Footing Flexure Flexure Axis & Load Combination Mu Side Tension As Req'd Gvrn. As Actual As Phi*Mn Status k-ft Surface in^2 in^2 in^2 k-ft Z-Z, +1.20D 0.09699 +X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Z-Z, +0.90D 0.07275 -X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK Z-Z, +0.90D 0.07275 +X Bottom 0.2160 AsMin 0.30 8.974 OK One Way Shear Load Combination... Vu @ -X Vu @ +X Vu @ -Z Vu @ +Z Vu:Max Phi Vn Vu / Phi*Vn Status +1.401D 0.77 psi 0.77 psi 0.77 psi 0.77 psi 0.77 psi 75.00 psi 0.01 OK +1.20D+1.60L 5.21 psi 5.21 psi 5.21 psi 5.21 psi 5.21 psi 75.00 psi 0.07 OK +1.20D+0.50L 2.08 psi 2.08 psi 2.08 psi 2.08 psi 2.08 psi 75.00 psi 0.03 OK +1.20D 0.66 psi 0.66 psi 0.66 psi 0.66 psi 0.66 psi 75.00 psi 0.01 OK +0.90D 0.49 psi 0.49 psi 0.49 psi 0.49 psi 0.49 psi 75.00 psi 0.01 OK Two -Way "Punching" Shear All units k Load Combination... Vu Phi*Vn Vu / Phi*Vn Status +1.401D 3.13 psi 150.00psi 0.02088 OK +1.20D+1.60L 21.31 psi 150.00psi 0.1421 OK +1.20D+0.50L 8.51 psi 150.00psi 0.0567 OK +1.20D 2.69 psi 150.00psi 0.0179 OK +0.90D 2.01 psi 150.00psi 0.01343 OK 3 Deck Railing Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Project Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Job No Designer Justin J Franklin Date 06-03-23 Pages Scope: Lateral load analysis and design of deck railing. Design Information: Guardrail Uniform Load at top Rail = 50 plf Guardrail Concentrated Load at Top Rail = 200 plf Guardrail Uniform Load at Components = 50 Ibs (applied over a 1 sq ft) Design Notes: Load Combination (IBC 1605.3.1.) D+F D+H+F+L D+H+F+(L, or S or R) D+H+F+0.75(L)+0.75(L, or S or R) D+H+F+(0.6W or 0.75E) D+H+F+0.75(0.6W)+0.75L+0.75(Lr or S or R) D+H+F+0.75(0.7E)+0.75L+0.75S 0.6D+0.6W+H 0.6(D+F)+0.7E+H 3 Deck Railing Sadowski Residence Deck Reconstruction Guardrail Post Attachment Through Bolts Loading M = 50*5*3.25 = 813 lb-ft Tmax = 813/(0.5) = 1625 Ibs Vmax = (50*5)/2 = 125 Ibs For 3/8" Diameter Through Bolts and Simpson DTT2 Deck Tension Tie Tallow = 1825 Ibs per tie Vallow = 410 Ibs per bolt Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION: Railing Posts CODE REFERENCES Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set: IBC 2021 Material Properties Analysis Method : Allowable Stress Design Fb + 900.0 psi E : Modulus of Elasticity Load Combination IBC 2021 Fb - 900.0 psi Ebend- xx 1,600.0ksi Fc - Prll 1,350.0 psi Eminbend - xx 580.Oksi Wood Species Douglas Fir -Larch Fc - Perp 625.0 psi Wood Grade No.2 Fv 180.0 psi Ft 575.0 psi Density 31.210pcf Beam Bracing Beam is Fully Braced against lateral -torsional buckling U0.25) 4x4 Span = 0.50 ft Applied Loads Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Load for Span Number 2 Point Load : L = 0.250 k @ 3.250 ft, (Top Railing Reaction) DESIGN SUMMARY Maximum Bending Stress Ratio = 0.758 1 Section used for this span 4x4 fb: Actual = 1,023.32 psi F'b = 1,350.00psi Load Combination +0.750L Location of maximum on span = 0.500ft Span # where maximum occurs = Span # 1 Maximum Deflection Max Downward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio = Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio = Max Downward Total Deflection 0.299 in Ratio = Max Upward Total Deflection -0.001 in Ratio = 4x4 Span = 3.250 ft Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations. Maximum Shear Stress Ratio = 0.829 : 1 Section used for this span 4x4 fv: Actual = 149.23 psi F'v = 180.00 psi Load Combination +0.750L Location of maximum on span = 0.000ft Span # where maximum occurs = Span # 1 0 <360 n/a 0 <360 n/a 260 -180 Span: 2: L Only 5028 -180 Span: 1 : L Only Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations Load Combination Max Stress F<atios Moment Values Shear a ues Segment Length Span # M V CD CM Ct CLx CIF Cfu C i C r M fb F'b V fv F'v 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 0.50 ft 1 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.500 1.00 0.80 1.00 972.0 0.00 0.0 129.6 Length = 3.250 ft 2 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.500 1.00 0.80 1.00 972.0 0.00 0.0 129.6 +0.750L 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.500 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 Length = 0.50 ft 1 0.758 0.829 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.500 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.61 1,023.3 1,350.0 1.22 149.2 180.0 Length = 3.250 ft 2 0.758 0.829 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.500 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.61 1,023.3 1,350.0 0.19 149.2 180.0 Overall Maximum Deflections Load Combination Span Max. "-" Defl Location in Span Load Combination Max. "+" Defl Location in Span 1 0.0000 0.000 L Only -0.0012 0.291 L Only 2 0.2990 3.250 0.0000 0.291 Project Title: Sadowski Residence Deck Remodel Engineer: Justin Franklin Project ID: Project Descr: Framing and Foundations for Deck Wood Beam %— Project File: framing and foundations.ec6 DESCRIPTION Vertical Reactions Railing Posts Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 Support 3 Max Upward from all Load Conditions 1.875 Max Upward from Load Combinations 1.406 Max Upward from Load Cases 1.875 Max Downward from all Load Conditio -1.625 Max Downward from Load Combinations -1.219 Max Downward from Load Cases (Resis -1.625 L Only -1.625 1.875 +0.750L -1.219 1.406