2023-12-11 City Council Special Packet2
3
4
5
6
of c�,y
s
Agenda
Edmonds City Council
SPECIAL MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
DECEMBER 11, 2023, 6:00 PM
PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR
THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING
ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261
OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261
THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A
VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY
DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO
UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND
OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL
MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE
AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO
THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
Edmonds City Council Agenda
December 11, 2023
Page 1
1. 2024 Budget Deliberations and Potential Adoption of 2024 Budget Ordinance (120 min)
2. Adopt the 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program (10 min)
3. Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement Review (20 min)
7. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
8. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT 9:00 PM
Edmonds City Council Agenda
December 11, 2023
Page 2
6.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 12/11/2023
2024 Budget Deliberations and Potential Adoption of 2024 Budget Ordinance
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
On October 2, Mayor Nelson presented the proposed 2024 City Budget. On October 17 and November
6, Council held public hearings on the 2024 budget.
Recommendation
Consider a motion to approve the 2024 Proposed Budget as amended, and direct the city attorney to
finalize the 2024 Budget ordinance.
Narrative
City Councilmembers will have discussion on the budget and amendments they would like to consider
for the 2024 City Budget.
Included in this agenda packet is the outcome of Council action on 12/5/23, with two motions from
Councilmember Nand that were postponed to a date certain of December 11, 2023.
Staff has prepared some final decision packages for Council to consider, aligning Council amendments
made to the CIP/CFP and other recent Council action, that impact the 2024 budget.
An updated spreadsheet of all decision packages in the 2024 Proposed Budget with the status (as
proposed, reduced, removed) and decision package expenditure as adjusted, new decision packages
approved by council, new staff proposed changes approved by council, and the pending decision
packages. *Please note: this council -requested spreadsheet includes decisions packages that impact
several funds, including the general fund. This spreadsheet does not provide accurate analysis for
ending fund balance estimations.
An updated spreadsheet with the impact of decisions to date on the General Fund.
A draft of the 2024 budget ordinance.
Attachments:
outcome of Tues Dec 5 2023 Budget Meeting Spreadsheet
DP- Yost Trail, Bridges and Tennis Court
DP- Shell Creek Restoration
DP- Landmark 99 Placeholder
DP- Intergovernmental Loan
121123 Decision Package Status
2024 GF Proposed with changes
2023-12-06 budget ordinance
Packet Pg. 3
6.1.a
Outcome of 12/5 Action
Budget
Nand
Fund 016
Bond Proceeds in Fund 016 to reimburse Bldg Maint
Postponed to date
$400,000
to GF
General fund for Police and court Facility
certain 12/11/23
Remodel
Nand
Fund 016
Bond Proceeds in Fund 016 to reimburse
Bldg Maint
Postponed to date
$529,083.33
to GF
General fund for first three years of interest
certain 12/11/23
expense.
Parks
W/D
Discussed, no motion
DP 17
Chen
GF
End 761" Avenue Rental Space
$49,000
Pg 127
Chen
GF
Youth Coordinator - .5FTE
Parks
$40,000
Pg. 49
Olson
GF
Reduce Interfund Transfer to Sister City
Mayor
MOTION CARRIES
$5,000
DP 63
Olson
Fund 016
Reduce $80,000 (specific to the City Hall -
Bldg Maintenance
2-5 MOTION FAILS
$80,000
Interior main stairway hand railing replacement)
*CM Olson delays to
DP 64
Olson
Fund 016
Reconsider previous vote that removed $65,000
Bldg Maintenance
+$65,000
for replacement of motorized gate
2024 discussion
13137
Paine
GF
Initiate a red-light camera program for 3
Police
Motion to Postpone to
$?
intersections, and recognizing that red light
Q1 2024 (BY VOTE 4-3)
infractions are a helpful method for reducing
driver behavior which causes vehicle, pedestrian
and/or bicycle collisions.
w
C
d
E
t
U
f�
Q
Packet Pg. 4
6.1.b
Decision Package Budget Report
City of Edmonds — City Staff
New Decision Package - Title : Yost Trails, Bridges, and Tennis Court
Amendment Regarding DP#: 82
Date
Budget Year
Staff
Duration
Approval Status
12/11/2023
2024
Director Feser
One Time
Pending
Item Description
Repair, renovations and major maintenance to Yost trails, bridges, and tennis courts.
Justification
Remove decision package 82 from the 2024 capital budget for the amount of $154,300 and reallocating
the funds to another decision package. The initial expenditure of 74,300 allocated for tennis/pickleball
courts resurfacing is no longer needed in 2024 due to upcoming Yost Reservoir renovation project (on
which the courts are located). Therefore, it is recommended this amount plus the remaining $80,000 for
trail and bridge restoration is allocated to NEW Decision Package titled: SHELL CREEK RESTORATION
(#TBD) to be combined with additional REET funding to provide for a larger scope of work of Shell Creek
restoration package. (See Parks CIP/CFP illustration below).
Describe All Funding Sources
REET
Describe Future on Ongoing Costs (Expenditure) or Savings (Reduction of Expediture):
Proiect Status (if ADDlicable)
FISCAL DETAILS
Expenditures — ($154,300)
Revenues - $0.00
Net Budget — ($154,300)
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Parks CIP/CFP Amendments as of 111812023
Prole cl
OFF
Project Sit,& Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
S-Year Total
Shell Creek Restomebn "�"nevene..
Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based
R39
on asutly.-Study e,,stingconditionanalysisin2024.Design, per—birgand
$ 250,000
$ 380,000
630,000
onstrudion work in 2025,
R9
rut Pack&Pool
R4
R6
Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include
;--1Nr10B
$ 2,296,400
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,296,400
1131
playground and Pool upgrades in 2025.
ONmpk Beach Park
R7
R�sesveew'FReplacement of failed notation system in
$ 20,000
�
$�..e
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 53,000
oa rdlnation with roof replacement (by Fad ties/PW)
DI6
lm reet PakDl7
[P.,1M
enhanremana to include the. addkbn of a nature playground,$-$-
$ -
$ _
$ 100,000
$ 340,370
$ 440,370
R14
mall shaker wld, plrnic tables a ad habitat rest brin, antl mnsd..t,.n ofaag
park amenity with public design process.
r-0
Packet Pg. 5
6.1.c
Decision Package Budget Report
City of Edmonds — City Staff
New Decision Package - Title: Shell Creek Restoration
Amendment Regarding DP#: New
Date
Budget Year
Staff
Duration
Approval Status
12/11/2023
2024
Director Feser
One Time
Pending
Item Description
Shell Creek Restoration in Yost Park
Justification
The proposed project is an Existing Condition Analysis of Shell Creek in Yost Park to identify and analysis
stream health and erosion control including, but not limited to the existing pedestrian trails, boardwalks,
bridges and historic concrete structures and inform future design, permitting and construction work
preliminary planned for 2025.
Describe All Funding Sources
REET Funds including the reallocation of $153,400 from decision package #82: Yost Trails, Bridges and
Tennis Court. Approval of this decision package requires the deletion of decision package #82 to provide
the $153,400. (Parks CIP/CFP below illustrates these reallocations)
Describe Future on Ongoing Costs (Expenditure) or Savings (Reduction of Expediture): No ongoing costs
as this is a analysis project, however, future costs could include the restoration work prescribed by this
existing condition analysis.
Project Status (if Applicable)
Has not started.
FISCAL DETAILS
Expenditures — $250,000
Revenues - $0.00
Net Budget — $250,000
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Parks CIP/CFP Amendments as of 111812023
Prole
UP
Prefect SRe&Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Shell Creek Restoration 1.ARRYFCRWA40.
Rl9
Stream heahh and erosun control of shek Creek in Yost Park,smpe TgO bawd
on duly-4wdy exbting condition analysis in 2024, Design, permitting and
"^,^^^
$ 250,000
$ 3RO,OIXI
$
$
$
$
$ 630,000
p ,ftod- work in 2025.
a4
Yost Park&Pool
PPark
6
en hancementt, repair a nd maintenance toinclude -
S--iWriG9
$ 1,296A00
$ -
$ -
S -
$ -
51,296,4W
1111
plaag—odand pool uogradesln2025.
."mpk gaach Park
R2
Replacementaffailed Vent,Wtonsystemin
$ 20,000
_
53,000
oad'matbn with roof replacemmt IbV facilRiez/PtNI
5 33,000
016
Elm Street Park
D,
Pak enhancements fd lRtlude [he addition Ofd nature playground,
R14
mall shaker wgh plcnlc tables and habdat rakorabon, and oo—deration ofa
dog park amenity with public deg, process
Packet Pg. 6
6.1.d
Decision Package Budget Report
City of Edmonds — City Staff
New Decision Package - Title: Landmark 99 Placeholder
Amendment Regarding DP#: New
Date
Budget Year
Staff
Duration
Approval Status
12/11/2023
2024
Director Tatum
One Time
Pending
Item Description
Iuctifirntion
Describe All Funding Sources
Affordable Housing Sales Tax Credit (HB 1406) Fund 141
Describe Future on Ongoing Costs (Expenditure) or Savings (Reduction of Expenditure):
Project Status (if Applicable)
FISCAI DFTAII S
Expenditures — $300,000
Packet Pg. 7
6.1.e
Decision Package Budget Report
City of Edmonds — City Staff
New Decision Package - Title: Utility Interfund Loan to the General Fund
Amendment Regarding DP#: New
Date
Budget Year
Staff
Duration
Approval Status
12/11/2023
2024
Director Turley
One Time
Pending
Item Description
As described in Washington State Auditors BARS Manual Section 3.9.1 it is permissible to make interfund
loans of those moneys which are clearly inactive or in excess of anticipated cash needs throughout the
duration of the loan and legally available for investment. The utility funds have demonstrated financial
resilience and maintain healthy fund balances.
The proposed interfund loan is consistent with applicable legal and regulatory frameworks governing
municipal finance. All necessary approvals and compliance checks will be undertaken to ensure the
legitimacy and appropriateness of this financial transaction.
Justification
The General Fund is currently facing financial challenges due to unforeseen economic factors, increased
operational costs and fluctuations in revenue streams. To address this fiscal strain, we are proposing an
interfund loan from the utility funds.
The interfund loan from utility funds to the General Fund in 2024 is a strategic and necessary step to
stabilize finances, maintain consistent governmental services, and uphold the community's
expectations. This decision aligns with our commitment to responsible financial management and will
position us for sustainable success in the years ahead. We request careful consideration and approval of
this proposal to safeguard the financial well-being of our municipality and ensure the continued
satisfaction of our residents.
Describe All Funding Sources
Water and/or Storm Fund
Describe Future on Ongoing Costs (Expenditure) or Savings (Reduction of Expenditure):
Early 2024 a loan agreement will be completed which will include a General Fund loan repayment
schedule with interest.
Protect Status (if Applicable)
FISCAI I)FTAII S
Water Expenditures — $3,000,000
Storm Expenditures - $3,000,000
General Fund Revenues - $6,000,000
Packet Pg. 8
6.1.f
Status of 2024 Proposed Decision Packages
Council Proposed DP's and Staff Proposed Changes
2024 Proposed
Department/Fund DPff Decision Package Description Expenditure Budget DP Status
Court Passport Expenditure Updates 18,500 As Proposed
2 Pretrial Monitoring 20,000 As Proposed
Administrative Services 0 Increase Transfer to Medical Ins. Reserve (009) 25,000 As Proposed
Information Technology 4 Weblink additional connection licenses 30,000 As Proposed
5 Technology Security Monitoring 5,000 As Proposed
6 replacement systems including desktops, laptops 102,500 As Proposed
Police 0 Traffic Cameras 180,000 Removed
Community Services 8 New Position - Grants Specialist 183,000 Removed
9 Public Art 139,535 AS Proposed
10 Lodging Tax Fund Budget - Fund 120 131,400 As Proposed
11 Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Budget Proposal 43,400 As Proposed
12 BID Annual Budget 102,495 As Proposed
13 Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund - Household Support Grant 300,000 As Proposed
Planning and Development 14 Climate Action Manager 149,623 Removed
15 Boards and Commission Support 15,801 Reduced
Parks and Recreation 16 Sound Salmon Solutions Contract Increase 6,000 As Proposed
17 Parks Maintenance Yard Lease 49,000 As Proposed
Facilities ISecurity and safety system changes 125,000 Removed
Engineering 19 Public Works Records Administrator 207,20o As Proposed
20 Armadillo Tracker - Traffic Data Collector 3,500 Removed
Street Fund I Purchase of Brine Machine for Ice Control 1 70,000 As Proposed
Water Fund 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Storm Fund 33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Utility Customer Merchant Fees
Water Utility Small Equipment Replacement
Utility Locator Position - PW FTE
Phase 15 WL Replacement (2025)
Yost and Seaview Reservoirs Repairs & Upgrades
2024 Waterline Replacement Overlays
Drinking Water System Model Update
Records Management & Scanning Services
Phase 13 WL Replacement (2023)
Phase 14 WL Replacement (2024)
PW Parking Lot Apron Repair & UST Repl.
280,000
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
AS Proposed
As Proposed
AS Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
AS Proposed
As Proposed
8,960
140,959
426,000
850,000
225,000
100,000
100,000
10,000
3,300,000
105,000
8,000
90,000
275,000
324,000
350,000
594,390
315,000
2,625
100,000
1,377,000
120,000
Sewer Fund 44 Sewer Division Shoring Equipment 30,000
45 Sewer Maintenance/GIS Worker 140,959
46 Phase 10 Sewer Replacement (2023) 10,000
47 Phase 12 Sewer Replacement (2025) 363,000
48 Sanitary Sewer Model Update 200,000
49 Phase 11 Sewer Replacement (2024) 2,005,000
5o Cured in Place Pipe Sewer Rehab Phase 4 (2024) 522,000
51 12024 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Overlays 60,000
WWTP Fund 52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Waste Disposal
Edmonds Marsh Water quality Improvement Project
Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Project
Phase 5 Storm Maintenance Project (2025)
Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan Update
Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update
2024 SD Overlays
Utilities rate increase
Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects
Phase 4 Storm Maintenance Project (2024)
7317 Lake Ballinger Way Floodplain Purchase & Stru
172,201
488,500
904,740
453,370
753,950
226,185
376,975
3,015,800
40,000
Equipment Rental 12024 Vehicle Replacements 475,000
Asset/Project Management Specialist
O&M Budget Adjustments
WWTP Primary Clarifier 2 rehab
Gasification Bypass (Class A Solids Production
Carbon Recovery Project (Close-out/Hauling)
Asset Criticality Ranking and Condition Assessment
VFD Upgrades/Replacements
Nutrient Removal Project
Position Upgrade - WWTP OIT to WWTP Operator
2024 Adjusted
Expenditure Budget as of
12/5/2023
18,500
20,000
25,000
30,000
5,000
102,500
139,535
131,400
43,400
102,495
300,000
11,701
6,000
49,000
207,200
70,000
As Proposed
8,000
As Proposed
90,000
As Proposed
275,000
AS Proposed
324,000
As Proposed
350,000
AS Proposed
594,390
As Proposed
315,000
As Proposed
2,625
As Proposed
100,000
As Proposed
1,377,000
As Proposed
120,000
As Proposed
30,000
AS Proposed
140,959
As Proposed
10,000
As Proposed
363,000
As Proposed
200,000
As Proposed
2,005,000
As Proposed
522,000
As Proposed
60,000
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
740 1
185 1
AS Proposed 1 475,000
1 Packet Pg. 9
6.1.f
Department/Fund
Building Maintenance
Street Capital Projects
2024 Adjusted
2024 Proposed
Expenditure Budget as of
DPq
Decision Package Description
Expenditure Budget
DP Status
12/5/2023
62
Operations Expenditure Increase
13,250
As Proposed
r 13,250
63
660,000
gRemo
660,000
Bond -Funded Deferred Maintenance Projects
65
ital Projects
145,000
Reduced
80,000
Tra Funds from 16 and Pq
Z ,000
Removed
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
2024 Transportation Plan Update
76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th St. SW to OVD
Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to 8th Ave
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 2
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 3
Hwy 99 Revitalization Stage 4
76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW Improvements
SR-104 Adaptive System from 236th St. SW to 226th
2024 Traffic Signal Upgrades
2024 Pedestrian Safety Program
2025 Overlay Program
88th Ave Overlay and Sidewalk Repair
Citywide Bicycle Improvements
2024 Traffic Calming Program
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S
2024 Overlay Program
236,085
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
Reduced
20,000
789,553
114,000
1,290,000
1,290,000
948,712
186,575
30,290
80,770
100,000
150,000
15,000
82,000
10,000
1,500,000
712
770
Parks Capital Projects 82 Yost Trails, Bridges and Tennis Court (Fund 125) 154,300 Removed
83 Waterfront Emergency Study 50,000 Removed -
84 Park Signage & Wayfinding Enhancements (Fund 125) 75,000 As Proposed 75,000
85 Ballinger Park ILA wtih MLT (Fund 125) 200,000 As Proposed 200,000
86 Mathay Ballinger Upgrade Completion (Fund 125) 271,300 As Proposed 271,300
87 Land Acquisition Support (Fund 126) 50,000 Removed -
Administrative Projects
88
Update WCIA Insurance Allocation
89
Add Ongoing 2023 Budget Amendments
90
Vehicle Fleet Cost Allocation to City Departments
91
Update to Debt Service Allocation
92
Techology Services Cost Allocation to Departments
93
Annual Utility Overhead Allocation Update
94
Operational Adjustments for Building Dept.
95
Reallocate Non -Departmental Budgets
96
Vacancy Rate Adjustment
97
JADM - Line Item Adjustments
Council Decision Packages
4
5
6
7
9
10
12 (A)
14
15
16
17
18
19
Staff Recommended Changes
Olympic Park Bathrooms 2024 - REET funded
$6.25M Fire Service Contract funded by ARPA F142
Fire Service Feasibility Assessment
Reduce Departmental Supply Budgets
Reduce Departmental Travel Budgets
Reduce Departmental Misc Budgets
Reduce Departmental Prof Svc Budgets
Reduce Departmental Communication Budgets
Reduce Prisoner Care IG Budget
Reduce 50% ECA Support
Reduce Tech component of Grants Specialist (DP 8)
Reduce Neighborhood City Hall overall budget
Reduce PD Admin Uniform allowance
Reduce PD Small Equipment
Reduce Council Overtime
Reduce Council Contingency
Reduce Interfund Transfer to Sister City
Salary Commission - Council
Salary Commission - Mayor
Utility Rate Update - Water Fund NET
Utility Rate Update - Sewer Fund NET
Utility Rate Update - Storm Fund NET
Utility Rate Update - General Fund Revenue
EPD Admin Staff Salary Adjustment
EPD Commissioned Officer Negotiation
BID Budget Adjustment
Reduce TIF Revenue
Reduce Non -Rep COLA increase from 4.6%to 4.0%
499,902
1,990,197
448,730
(1,296)
636,047
1,740,190
(1,500)
(3,200,000)
(186,475)
38,685
21,904
685,249
302,846
(324,511)
189,647
50,021
200,414
(32,467)
(380,000)
(54,213)
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
As Proposed
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
902
197
190
2 Packet Pg. 10
6.1.g
2024 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
6,664,594
Staff ADJ's Less 2023 fund balance
(3,617,594)
3,047,000
2024 REVENUE - Proposed
62,492,771
Council ADJ's less $2M from F016
(2,000,000)
Council ADJ's less $3.5M Red Light
(3,500,000)
Council ADJ's less $6.5M ARPA
(6,500,000)
Staff ADJ's add Utility Tax
189,647
50,682,418
2024 EXPENSES - Proposed
59,429,234
Council ADJ's ADD Council Prof Svc - Fitch
44,500
Council ADJ's less $180K Red Light
(180,000)
Council ADJ's less Grant Specialist FTE
(183,000)
Council ADJ's less Climate Manager FTE
(149,623)
Council ADJ's less Security and Safety System
(125,000)
Council ADJ's less ARPA to pay this much of RFA
(6,250,000)
Council ADJ's less DP 15 Boards and Commissions Support
(4,100)
Council ADJ's less DP 20 Armadillo Tracker
(3,500)
Council ADJ's less Reduce Supplies
(53,940)
Council ADJ's less Reduce Travel Budgets
(22,833)
Council ADJ's less Reduce Misc Budgets
(94,382)
Council ADJ's less Reduce Prof Svc Budgets (as amend.)
(295,487)
Council ADJ's less Reduce Communication Budget
(14,000)
Council ADJ's less Prisoner Care IG
(375,000)
Council ADJ's less ECA Support
(25,000)
Council ADJ's less Tech component of Grants Spec
(3,000)
Council ADJ's less Neighborhood City Hall overall budget
(5,000)
Council ADJ's less EPD Uniforms (Admin)
(7,000)
Council ADJ's less EPD Small Equipment
(50,000)
Council ADJ's less Council OT Budget
(1,000)
Council ADJ's less Council Contingency Budget
(15,000)
Council ADJ's less Sister City Transfer
(5,000)
Staff ADJ's ADD Salary Commission - Council
38,685
Staff ADJ's ADD Salary Commission - Mayor
21,904
Staff ADJ's ADD PD Admin Staff Salary
50,021
Staff ADJ's ADD Meadowdale Preschool Subsidy
-
Staff ADJ's ADD Commissioned Officer Negotiations
200,414
Staff ADJ's less Reduce Non -Rep from 4.6% to 4%
(54,213)
51,868,680
2024 ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,860,738
Packet Pg. 11
6.1.h
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY
OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024
WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington completed and placed on file with the
City Clerk a proposed budget and estimate of the amount of moneys required to meet the public
expenses, bond retirement and interest, reserve funds, and expenses of government of the City
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024; and
WHEREAS, a notice was published that the City Council would meet on [insert date(s)
of public hearing(s) on budget], 2023 for the purpose of giving taxpayers within the limits of the
City an opportunity to be heard in a public hearing upon said budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hold a public hearing at that time and place and did
then consider the matter of the proposed budget for the fiscal year 2024; and
WHEREAS, the proposed budget does not exceed the lawful limit of taxation allowed by
law to be levied on the property within the City for the purposes set forth in the budget, and the
estimated expenditures set forth in the budget being all necessary to carry on the government of
the City for the fiscal year 2024 and being sufficient to meet the various needs of the City during
that period;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The budget for the City of Edmonds, Washington for the year 2024 is hereby
adopted at the fund level in its final form and content as set forth in the comprehensive budget
document, the City of Edmonds Adopted Budget, copies of which are on file in the Office of the
City Clerk.
Section 2. Estimated resources, including ending fund balances for each separate fund of
the City of Edmonds, for the year 2024 are set forth in summary form below, and are hereby
Packet Pg. 12
6.1.h
appropriated for expenditure at the fund level during the year 2024 as set forth in the City of
Edmonds Adopted Budget.
Section 3. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of the budget hereby
adopted to the State Auditors' Office and to the Municipal Research and Services Center
(MRSC).
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance, being exempt under RCW 35A.11.090, is not
subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an
approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
IM
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 13
6.1.h
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2023, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE
CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2024
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of 92023.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
4840-7251-8158,v. 1
Packet Pg. 14
s.z
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 12/11/2023
Adopt the 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program
Staff Lead: Rob English, Oscar Antillon, Angie Feser & Shannon Burley
Department: Engineering
Preparer: Emiko Rodarte
Background/History
On September 19, 2023, staff presented the proposed 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan & Capital
Improvement Program in a joint meeting with the City Council and Planning Board.
On October 10, 2023, a public hearing was held for this item.
On October 24, 2023, this item was forwarded to a future City Council meeting for further discussion.
On November 6, 2023, City Council continued discussion and approved amendments to the proposed
2024-2029 CFP-CIP documents.
On November 14, 2023, City Council continued discussion on the proposed 2024-2029 CFP-CIP
documents.
On December 5, 2023, City Council rescheduled approval of the 2024-2029 CFP-CIP documents to the
December 11th City Council meeting.
Staff Recommendation
Approve Ordinance.
Narrative
The Public Works and Utilities Department 2024-2029 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 1. The Parks,
Recreation & Human Services Department 2024-2029 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 2. The
presentations for Public Works & Utilities and Parks, Recreation and Human Services are attached.
(Attachments 3 & 4).
The Planning Board held a public hearing on September 27, 2023 (see Attachment 5 for the minutes).
The Planning Board prepared a memo to the City Council after their review of the CFP-CIP documents
(see Attachment 6). The Planning Board Chair notified City staff of a typo in the letter regarding the
reference to the sidewalks on 236th St. SW in the third paragraph. The limits on 236th St. SW should
have been 84th Ave W and State Route 104 (not HWY 99). The Planning Board minutes from the
October 11, 2023 meeting are attached (Attachment 7).
Packet Pg. 15
s.z
Public Works and Parks staff have responded to council member questions since the initial presentations
were made in September. Responses to council member questions are attached (Public Works -
Attachments 8 & 9 and Parks Attachments 10).
The amendments and changes discussed at the November 6th and 14th City Council meeting are
attached (Public Works - Attachment 11 and Parks Attachment 12).
Attachments 13 and 14 are proposed amendments submitted by council members Teitzel and
Buckshnis.
The Landmark 99 project has been added to the Public Works & Utilities CFP-CIP documents under the
Facilities section as Project PWF-24. The Facilities section has also been revised to show a reduction of
bond funds in 2026 by $529,083. A second option is attached showing a reduction of bond funds of
$929,083 in 2026, if the City Council decides to choose this option during the budget deliberations. The
reductions have been made to the Frances Anderson Center (PWF-05).
Attachment 16 is the proposed ordinance to adopt the 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital
Improvement Program for the Public Works & Utilities Department and Parks, Recreation and Human
Services Department.
BACKGROUND:
The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at
least the next six years, which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital
improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities in
order to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth
Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects.
These preservation projects are part of the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with
capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related
projects.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 -
2024 Public Works CIP.CFP
Attachment 2 -
2024 Parks CIP.CFP
Attachment 3 -
Public Works Presentation
Attachment 4 -
Parks Presentation
Attachment 5 -
Planning Board Minutes 09.27.23
Attachment 6 -
Planning Board Memo
Attachment 7 -
Planning Board Minutes 10.11.2023
Attachment 8 -
Public Works Q and A Matrix 10.03.2023
Attachment 9 -
PW CIP CFP Q and A Matrix 11.06.2023
Attachment 10
- Parks Capital Q and A Matrix 2023.11.08
Attachment 11
- PW CFP-CIP Amendments 12.05.23
Attachment 12
- Parks CIP-CFP 2024-2029 REVISIONS
Attachment 13
- Teitzel CIP CFP amendments 10 29 23
Attachment 14
- Buckshnis CFP-CIP Amendments
Attachment 15
- COE PW CIP Overview
Attachment 16
- Ordinance
Packet Pg. 16
6.2.a
TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECT MAP..............................................................ii
FACILITIES & WWTP PROJECT MAP............................................................................iii
TRANSPORTATION...........................................................................................................1 •
PRESERVATION/MAINTENANCE PROJECTS............................................................6
SAFETY/CAPACITY ANALYSIS......................................................................................5
NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS.........................................39
as
FERRYPROJECTS....................................................................................................62
TRAFFIC CALMING 64
................................................................................................
TRAFFICPLANNING.............................................................................................. 66
GREENSTREETS......................................................................................................69
WATER........................................................................................................................... 71
STORMWATER.............................................................................................................. 76
EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION RELATED PROJECTS.....................78
PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN PROJECTS..........................................................................80
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS................................................84
ANNUALLY FUNDED PROJECTS...........................................................................87
COMPLIANCE RELATED PROJECTS......................................................................90
SEWER........................................................................................................................... 92
FACILITIES......................................................................................................................
99
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.........................................................................122
CFP-CIP COMPARISON(2024-2029)....................................................................134
Packet Pg. 18
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
6.2.a
PWT-05
FPW,I,��T-07
PWT-65 �X-.�
PWT-04 ,—
PWT-51
PWT-25
•
PWT-03
PWT-09
PWT-12
W�6
PWT-35 "PVUT-3Z
PWT-19 PWT-16
•
PWT-11
PWT-15
-- — PWT-20 --
PWT-08
PWT-21
�_ PWT-�9 •
PWT-30 PWTI20 PWT-13 PWT-14
PWT-47 P.WT 3? PWT-3i
PWT-06 PWT-23 PWTi64 PWT-50
PWT-06 PWS-11
—.�.� PWD-07
MEMO = PWD-06
WPPWT-26 P
��' PWT-10
* Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. PWT-43 0 LPacket Pg. 19
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 H
i
ST
0
- �w
o PWF-13�����
O�
00' �ft �M
d4 =
IV
.
04 T
.■ no
PWF-014:
AN 141
>�� ~ PWF-16 '�''
PWF-03 7 0 jft wi :lI
W F-10 %W� 09 ; tow""
EFJJ-
�i
ev rgo,••'
1,!
■
"Im
t
4
W
NOWI:Ih
:*.����*. [IVU"lk
1 ■� ■EI
= �pp.I'
*
96
-
PWF-09 Go ' 11-7FAIM
IWF-03 • PWrPVFy�05 PWF
�@5 PWF-10 1
OAF-23 PWF1
PW_F-13
PWF-2
r
�Lr.l
V �111111 ��
N1111P LI
r
� ����
0
* Site specific projects only. Citywide/ —annual citywide
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 iii
PWF-08
•
�- - --FA--TWA
�-A
\rI
�i fI•, '
roiects no s own."
Packet Pg. 20
1 ` 1
6.2.a
Packet Pg. 21
6.2.a
TRANSPORTATION
w
Preservation / Maintenance
Projects
PWT-01
Annual Street Preservation
81 $1,525,000
$2,400,000
$1,300,000
$2,630,000
$2,630,000
$2,630,000
$13,115,000
$39,450,000
LL
$52,565,0( -
Program
.r
PWT-03
76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th
67 $20,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$20,0(
St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
U
PWT-04
Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to
68 $789,553
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$789,553
$0
$789,5., N
8th Ave.
N
PWT-05
Puget Dr. / OVD Signal Upgrades
$0
$0
$0
$90,000
$496,000
$0
$586,000
$0
v
$586,0( c
PWT-06
Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave /
$0
$0
$0
$165,000
$773,000
$0
$938,000
$0
N
$938,0( 0-
238th St. SW
-0a
PWT-07
Main St. / 3rd Signal Upgrades
$0
$0
$0
$0
$110,000
$383,000
$493,000
$0
$493,0( Q
PWT-61
Olympic View Dr Overlay - 196th /
$0
$200,000
$1,300,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$0
$1,500,0( c
SR-524 to Talbot Rd
PWT-68
88th Ave Overlay and Sidewalk
77 $150,000
$1,350,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$0
. LA
$1,500,0( >
Repair
Safety / Capacity Analysis
a.
PWT-08
X
St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th
$0
$0
$0
$1,447,000
$2,500,000
$13,100,000
$17,047,000
$0
$17,047,0( a
Pl. W Corridor
PI. W
U
PWT-09
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway -
69 $114,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$114,000
$0
$114,0( �
Stage 2
`-
PWT-10
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 3
70 $1,290,000
$1,630,000
$1,612,000
$13,000,000
$13,752,000
$0
$31,284,000
$0
$31,284,0(
PWT-11
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 4
71 $1,290,000
$1,500,000
$4,000,000
$2,369,000
$0
$16,434,000
$25,593,000
$16,000,000
$41,593,0( a
le
N
PWT-12
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 5
$0
$0
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,500,000
$43,673,000
$47,173,0( N
PWT-13
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 6
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$21,160,000
$21,160,0( r
c
m
PWT-14
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 7
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$40,430,000
$40,430,0( t
PWT-15
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 8
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$35,242,000
.r
$35,242,0( Q
PWT-16
X
Hwy 99 Revitalization - Stage 9
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$21,277,000
w
$21,277,0(
PWT-17
X
SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave. W
$0
$0
$0
$263,000
$238,000
$788,000
$1,289,000
$0
$1,289,0( cva
Intersection Improvements
Q
PWT-18
X
Main St. / 9th Ave. Intersection
$0
$0
$0
$198,000
$1,092,000
$0
$1,290,000
$0
$1,290,00u
Improvements
2024 PW CFP/CIP I
December 2023
2
1 Packet Pg. 22
TRANSPORTATION
6.2.a
PWT-19
X
76th Ave. W / 220th St. SW -
72
$650,000
$774,100
Intersection Improvements
PWT-20
SR-104 Adaptive System
73
$186,575
$0
PWT-21
X
SR-104 /100th Ave W. Intersection
$0
$0
Improvements
PWT-22
X
SR-104 / 95th PI. W Intersection
$0
$0
Improvements
PWT-23
X
SR-104 / 238th St. SW
$0
$0
Intersection Improvements
PWT-24
X
Olympic View Dr. / 76th Ave. W
$0
$0
Intersection Improvements
PWT-25
X
84th Ave. W (212th St. SW to
$0
$0
238th St. SW)
PWT-26
X
SR-104 / 76th Ave. W Intersection
$0
$0
Improvements
PWT-27
X
Olympic View Dr. / 174th St. SW
$0
$0
Intersection Improvements
PWT-28
175th Slope Repair
$0
$0
PWT-59
2024 Traffic Signal and Safety
74
$30,290
$0
Upgrades
PWT-67
Waterfront Emergency Response
83
$0
$0
Study
Non -Motorized Transportation Projects
PWT-29
X
232nd St. SW Walkway from
$0
$0
100th Ave. to SR-104
PWT-30
X
236th St. SW Walkway - Madrona
$0
$0
Elementary to 97th Ave. W
PWT-31
X
236th St. SW Walkway from Hwy.
$0
$0
99 to 76th Ave. W
PWT-32
X
84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th
$160,000
$1,350,000
St. SW to 234th St. SW
PWT-33
X
80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th
$0
$0
St. SW to 206th St. SW
PWT-34
X
80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th
$0
$0
St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
PWT-35
X
218th St. SW Walkway from 76th
$0
$0
Ave. W to 84th Ave. W
,, ,.
- -- U)
w
$50,000
$6,670,000
$0
$0
$8,144,100
$0
$8,144,1( 'v
0
u_
$0
$4,400,000
$0
$0
$4,586,575
$0
$4,586,5, 'o
$0
$180,000
$720,000
$1,600,000
$2,500,000
$0
.Q
$2,500,0( U
rn
N
$0
$42,000
$228,000
$0
$270,000
$0
$270,0( N
v
N
$0
$227,000
$1,292,000
$0
$1,519,000
$0
$1,519,0( N
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,347,000
a
$1,347,0(
a
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$17,615,000
$17,615,0( r
c
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,424,000
$3,424,0( 'y
d
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$715,000
$715,0(
a
$0
$1,000,000
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$0
u_
$11000,0( L)
a
$0
$0
$0
$0
$30,290
$0
$30,Z y
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
L
0
�:
2
a
$0
$0
$284,000
$1,572,000
$1,856,000
$0
$1,856,0( N
0
N
$0
$296,000
$1,692,000
$0
$1,988,000
$0
$1,988,0( '
r
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,937,000
r
$1,937,0(
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,510,000
$0
t
$1,510,0( r
Q
$0
$110,000
$120,000
$1,352,000
$1,582,000
$0
$1,582,0(
aD
$0
$482,000
$1,851,000
$0
$2,333,000
$0
$2,333,0( t
0
$0
$264,000
$1,474,000
$0
$1,738,000
$0
$1,738,0( Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
3 1 Packet Pg. 23
6.2.a
TRANSPORTATION
Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave.
PWT-36
X
S to 7th Ave S
PWT-37
X 216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy.
99 to 72nd Ave W
Citywide Bicycle Improvements
PWT-39
X
Project
78
PWT-40
X Maplewood Dr. Walkway from
Main St. to 200th St. SW
95th PI. W Walkway from 224th
PWT-41
X
St. SW to 220th St. SW
PWT-43
X SR-104 / 76th Ave. W Non -
Motorized Trans Improvements
PWT-45
X SR-104 Walkway - HAWK Signal to
Pine / Pine from SR-104 to 9th
PWT-46
X 191 st St. SW from 80th Ave. W to
76th Ave. W
104th Ave. W / Robinhood Lane
PWT-47
X
from 238th to 106th
PWT-48
X 80th Ave. W from 218th St. SW to
220th St. SW
84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to
PWT-49
X
186th St. SW
PWT-50
X 238th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 76th
Ave. W
Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave.
PWT-55
X
S to 9th Ave. S
80
PWT-60
2024 Pedestrian Safety Program
75
PWT-66
4th Avenue Cultural Corridor
Ferry Projects
PWT-51
X Ferry Storage Improvements from
Pine St. to Dayton St.
Traffic Calming
PWT-52
Traffic Calming Program
79
,, ,.
- --
w
$0
$0
$0
$290,000
$0
$0
$290,000
$0
$290,0( 'v
M
u_
$0
$0
$0
$220,000
$0
$0
$220,000
$0
$220,0( 'o
$15,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$15,000
$0
.Q
$15,0( U
0
N
$0
$0
$0
$220,000
$220,000
$2,511,000
$2,951,000
$0
$2,951,0( N
v
N
$0
$0
$0
$131,000
$731,000
$0
$862,000
$0
$862,0( N
$0
$0
$0
$261,000
$1,310,000
$0
$1,571,000
$0
a
$1,571,0( -00
a
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,276,000
$3,276,000
$0
$3,276,0( r
c
O
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$719,000
$719,0( 'y
d
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,124,000
$1,124,0(
a
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$344,000
LL
$344,0( L)
a
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$348,000
$348,0( y
$0
$0
$0
$199,000
$1,164,000
$0
$1,363,000
$0
L
O
$1,363,0( �:
$10,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,0(
a
$80,770
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$80,770
$0
$80,7, N
0
N
$0
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$0
$8,000,0( '
r
r
C
d
E
$0
$0
$0
$380,000
$0
$0
$380,000
$0
$380,0(
.r
r
Q
$100,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$22,000
$210,000
$330,000
c
$540,0(
t
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
4 1 Packet Pg. 24
6.2.a
TRANSPORTATION
:D
Traffic Planning
ADA Transition Plan (Right -of-
PWT-53
$0
$440,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$440,000
$0
LL
$440,0(
Way)
r
.Q
PWT-54 Transportation Plan Update
66 $236,085
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$236,085
$0
$236,M m
Green Streets
rn
o
PWT-64 X Green Streets 236th St SW - 84th
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,500,000
$3,500,000
$0
N
$3,500,0( N
Ave W to Highway 99
c
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
$6,647,273
$9,666,100
$8,284,000
$37,524,000
$36,619,000
$55,168,000
$153,908,373
$245,135,000
$396,655,3�
a
0
M
a
SUBTOTAL029
(2024-2029)
00-
r
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -
$251,570
$105,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$356,570
$0
$356,5,
modal revenue
.0
rn
REET Fund 125
$1,224,345
$850,000
$950,000
$1,190,000
$750,000
$750,000
$5,714,345
$11,250,000
$16,964,3,
REET Fund 126
$975,905
$872,000
$1,614,300
$1,212,000
$772,000
$772,000
$6,218,205
$11,580,000
$17,798,2( LL
U
Transportation Impact Fees
$423,361
$466,229
$1,033,475
$0
$0
$0
$1,923,065
$0
$1,923,0( U
General Fund
$0
$335,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$335,000
$0
u)
$335,0( L
0
Water Utility Fund 421
$18,000
$18,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$36,000
$0
$36,0(
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$69,000
$225,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$294,000
$0
$294,0( a
Sewer Utility Fund 423
$0
$40,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$40,000
$0
$40,0( c
N
Federal Grants
$2,070,355
$744,871
$2,716,525
$0
$0
$0
$5,531,751
$0
$5,531,7! r
State Grants
$1,572,237
$2,630,000
$1,969,700
$13,000,000
$6,688,000
$0
$25,859,937
$0
r
c
$25,859,9, E
t
Other (Sound Transit Grant)
$7,500
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,500
$0
$7,5( r
Q
ARPA
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
c
Unsecured Funding
$85,000
$3,380,000
$0
$22,122,000
$28,409,000
$53,646,000
$107,557,000
$222,305,000
a�
$329,862,0( t
$399,043,31
TOTAL REVENUE
$6,647,273
$9,666,100
$8,284,000
$37,524,000
$36,619,000
$55,168,000
$153,908,373
$245,135,000
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 5 1 Packet Pg. 25
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
Packet Pg. 26
6.2.a
Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets.
Maintains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital investment to rebuild City steets
mcmues pnur year expenuiiures
$1,600,000 1 Mn
rnipct C_nO 9n9d 9n95 9n96 9n97 9n9R 9n99 9n_
Design
$150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$130,000
$130,000
$130,000
$1,95O,OOC U
Right of Way
d
Construction
$1,450,000
$2,250,000
$1,150,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
$37,5OO,OOC )
Expense Total
$1,600,000
$2,400,000
$1,300,000
$2,630,000
$2,630,000
$2,630,000
$39,450,000 0
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
3:
REET Fund 125
$800,000
$750,000
$650,000
$750,000
$750,000
$750,000
$11,25O,OOC
REET Fund 126
$800,000
$750,000
$650,000
$750,000
$750,000
$750,000
$11,25O,OOC a
Transportation Impact Fees
N
General Fund
0
N
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
r
Federal Grants (D
E
State Grants
Unsecured Funding $900,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $16,95O,OOC
Funding Source Total $1,600,000 $2,400,000 $1,300,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $39,450,000 Q
c
d
E
t
v
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 7 1 Packet Pg. 27
185th PI SV!
II 'Il
"I' P1
w
> s
= a
00
= o
H
00,5t
192nd St SW
184th St SW
186th St SW
187th St SW
188th St SW
3
r,
Q
spy
Q
187th P1 SV!
T IR
3 �0
v
i 189th PI S/✓
a>190th St SW f OPT
�
o
1
191st
St SW
Sib 8014
192nd PI SW
I)r
193rd PI S
3 a
a
194th St
ss _
196TH ST SV
s s
7
103rd PI SW
F, � o
a'
O Q rn
� 113ah St SW 185th St SW
- �.-'o P v
O -
4y ^�
'�
v 3:
185th PI
� �
MP
Q SW
I
�
�c-
Q
1861h StSW
Stith St
I
e
Sw
�
187th P1 SW�,
Q
188TH ST SW=
�
1881h=P1.
—Penny�
_Penny
Ln
189th- PI-Shla9thalsv,
a 190th=St=SWs
190th_St=SW
iw,
N191 st PI SW
192nd St
PI SW
sW192nd
¢ 3
W192nd
PI=SW-Park Wa}
S 193rd PI SW�a -.
-193rdSt SW 193rd St SW
194r3P1 SW
; 194th SI SW
a
a N
A
A pavement overlay of 76th Ave from 196th St. SW (SR-524) to Olympic View Dr was completed in 2023. The project close-
out and required federal documents for the transportation grant will be completed in 2024. The east side of the street is
within the City of Lynnwood and was included in the project.
Improve pavement condition and upgrade pedestrian curb ramps to meet ADA standards. In addition to the existing
southbound bike lane, the project may add a new northbound bike lane as outlined in the City's Transportation
Comprehensive Plan.
$2,583,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Other
Funding Source Total
$20,000
$20,000
$7,500
$5,000
$7,500
$20,000
c
0
.N
a�
a
LL
U
a_
U
0
Y
L
0
3
a
N
0
N
c
m
E
s
0
to
Q
w
0
E
s
0
to
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 8 1 Packet Pg. 28
z
w
Q L
�L 5T O
a
r
Mw r iIINsS�T
0
cc
0 N
LU
kn
UJ
DAYTON ST
Pavement overlay along Main St. from 6th Ave. to 8th Ave. with pedestrian curb ramps upgrades. The project will be fundE
with a federal grant and City funds for a local match.
Improve pavement conditions and pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) on this segment of Main Street.
Estimated Project Cost
prior year expenditures
$937,500
Project Cost
Design
$9,000
Right of Way
Construction
$780,553
Expense Total
$789,553
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
$672
REET Fund 125
$158,001
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants $630,880
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total $789,553
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 9 1 Packet Pg. 29
6.2.a
Q
0
fir; S� J 2 Excelsior PI
cu
wood Ch a' <`G E
J o
rn �
O
PUGET DR
w
>
a
Puget WayW U
>, Edmonds d
Elementary
0 Puget Way — OJ
-1_ _
The project will rebuild the existing traffic signal and remove the signal heads currently on span wire and install standard
traffic signal poles with mast arms. Vehicle detention will also be upgraded as part of this project.
This upgrade will provide safer roadway conditions since the hanging signal heads will be replaced with fixed signal heads c
mast arms. The new vehicle detection will guarantee that all vehicles will be detected.
$586,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$90,000
$496,000
$90,000 $496,000
$90,000 $496,000
$90,000 $496,000
0
.N
d
a
u_
U
a_
U
M
L
0
v
a
v
N
O
N
c
d
v
w
Q
c
d
E
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 10 1 Packet Pg. 30
W °j� ° C
S <
N -
w i
1— 237th PI;
O ,
O s
V
238th St SW 3 •
� a
Faith =
Community Q o • 238th St SW
Church s� i
N
Q 2�9 i
�h u
o Stl,
Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system.
The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.
$938,000
Design
$165,000
Right of Way
Construction
$773,000
Expense Total
$165,000
$773,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$165,000
$773,000
Funding Source Total
$165,000
$773,000
c
0
TO
N
• ♦'i
a
u_
U
a_
U
w
0
2
3
a
N
O
N
21
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
Packet Pg. 31
Bracketts Jc _
Landing as a
South
Railroad
Station
✓awes J� Mini Park*
J?
= Post
Office
a
Q
CliJ�
.4W J�
IT
�
s �Q-
St
Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system.
The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.
$493,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
Edmonds Polic
' e%&t and Municipa
o` Court
Veteran'
Edmonds Centennial Plaz
City Hall Plaza Bell
2X
N
Fountain
MQlN �T
$383,000
$110,000 $383,000
$110,000 $383,000
$110,000 $383,000
_
0
y
N
a
u_
U
a_
U
0
2
3
a
N
O
N
c
m
E
s
0
ca
Q
w
a�
E
s
0
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 12 1 Packet Pg. 32
Pavement overlay along Olympic View Dr, from 196th St. SW / SR-524 to Talbot Road, along with ADA curb ramp upgrades.
Improve pavement condition and improve accessibility for pedestrians of all abilities.
$1,500,000
Design
$200,000
Right of Way
Construction
$1,300,000
Expense Total
$200,000
$1,300,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$100,000
$300,000
REET Fund 126
$100,000
$300,000
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants $700,000
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total $200,000 $1,300,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 13 1 Packet Pg. 33
rib O-V
will
♦r i -,IV- -
■ ♦ a • �•I�ir.► f Iw6/00
r
...
f ■1 Ir•„I
•.� I..■.�
•11 ii � •• 1•� l
•r
t`■
�, wi'
r►+ I it IN .' 1 / all■. �'
�� �� ,
r.r III, r. .� a •a..
::
�••
r 1
Imo" rll�I
►� �` ��• ,I►
`S
• _
PUGETOR—
W _r■ 1 �
185th PI SW 6. VB _
for.-rrrt J:lv�^♦dam r �■.:� ■Ili / 1 a i
RI_� l •i. t I f �!
•
-�� ��I / Lam■ i� �. v3V w�'1•r, ■� 1 ♦ C1
•�7
.r 'ram• � I■. 0� .: iwas
w, — � ��•—ra'.r�r�a�
III.44 ;'� !•1 •I _1� ---_.;
-- lsmsrsw - 3
This project will resurface 88th Ave and improve the existing asphalt sidewalk on the east side of 88th Ave from 196th St S\
to 185th PI SW in the Seaview neighborhood. All City utilities along this section of 88th Ave have been upgraded in recent
years and the street is ready to pave. The existing curb is in poor condition and varies in height. The project will install 6"
concrete vertical curbs and repave the existing asphalt sidewalk.
Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and pedestrian safety.
$1,500,000
Project Costirwr 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030-44
Design $150,000
Right of Way
Construction
$1,350,000
Expense Total
$150,000
$1,350,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$65,000
REET Fund 126
$65,000
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$20,000
$180,000
Sewer Utility Fund 423
$40,000
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$1,130,000
Funding Source Total
$150,000
$1,350,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 14 1 Packet Pg. 34
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 15
Packet Pg. 35
3 --0'-A Iw + r•� rf-==-�.i �'rlro, ESPLKANCL .• ��
Sth St SW 224th St SW ■' ■ r� ~ �'
_ 224th St S _224th St;SW
iR + '. ■ rq WI_ iNo Irr
23xhPisw 1 3& RaFrr-6 ■ ■ a��. `V�i� ;i�di■ff".
v1 a, i26PIS_w f + 1 a;i �. �h; e=a
�.a l�' "� �.� I.i�L■. L3 >9 a� 0�■ L�� r ■ �� a ac'�..J t<
a wZ.�s,L nsrn-swis ■ 7 �.�....3 �' �� �'
ii i �'a l 3 i ' m v a r a; (- Pi~sw
- � Zlc■+Im �1 a ,6 a, y!J 7-* -7 ■- N!- > ■ �r��Q �r7 �' .,
2 t- -- _ Q I J
a ■ a 226th St SW,--- _ 226thrSt SW
in 4� a-�'`�CCONOT 1 �II'j•.i 1 �Q�.r .'w f;. �;ism
�1-+ r
._..
iiw�r .�'rn -1 .e.* w �} a1A'1 it■11�,Is
f n"!%� ! ■ r L� 1I� ��7r%dl��
nnns sW .
3 m
at a 228TH ST SIB
c_e ,y r ilro 4 -rm i 'a• ■.'i, mvpMap .1 A • � 'i�s�ly +dam
■ uansrs;. or.-
d—
F * )=1 i a ■ . 229th St-
Q a A �f ■� � 1 i A..� � S' a- I
��■«A !� )� ■( 1 it 7 w
ip,• ter-r m 230th St -SW - 230th St SW'
�t��. , ell �� i i � �.' � e, "+�' � �� � � n
Y l+s�yoy�% 'Is 3 231stIStISW i ■
■,sl■�sl r m w Or31
lip
d. I lilt
232nd St SW t y a J Inuuu i ♦ I ■'! �i , , ,:,. �� �• acg.tG
■ �I
rr P ` �r.��17w��� �+Lw,.�. i►* tr :�� `�■ : Q•,z3�ri
zsnhn �isw-m ._ - . e h I
Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W to three lanes (with center two-way left turn lane), with curb and gutter,
sidewalk, and bike lanes.
This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this corridor. Community Transit will evalua a
the possibility of creating a new east -west bus route along 228th St. SW, if this project moves forward (connecting Edmond r
Transit Station to Mountlake Terrace Transit Station). _
0
N
Estimated Project Cost
$17,047,000
a
LL
0
•
a
- v
Design
$1,447,000 $1,500,000
L
Right of Way
$1,000,000
0
Construction
$13,100,000
V
Expense Total
$1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000
3
a
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
N
c
N
REET Fund 126
r
Transportation Impact Fees
=
d
General Fund
E
t
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
r
Federal Grants
r
Q
State Grants c
m
Unsecured Funding $1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000 t
Funding Source Total $1,447,000 $2,500,000 $13,100,000 M
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP 1 December 2023 16 1 Packet Pg. 36
V)
N
�
>
>
w
a
a
o
=
a
_
M
l~n
H
p,
3
Q�
>
Q
=
a
a
o
A.
o
�P
0
O
O
3
&OW,DOIIM
244TH ST
212TH S1 SW
w
a
Z
Ln
Ln
w
>
a
a 3
w
3
—
�
a
.c = >
3
a~o Q
Ln =
w
>
Q
Ln
2
F-
236TH ST SW
244TH ST SW
In 2023, the project constructed landscaped center medians on Highway 99 from 244th St. SW to 212th St. SW, a HAWK `c
signal — 600' north of 234th St. SW, and gateway signs on both ends of the corridor. Plant establishment and project close-
out will continue in 2024. c
The conversion of the center two-way left turn lane to a landscaped raised median will improve corridor safety along this
7
Highway of Regional Significance (HRS), with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of — 35,000 vehicles per day. The new HAWK
r_
signal will provide a signalized pedestrian crossing between the existing traffic signals at 238th St and 228th St.Estimated
0
a�
Project Cost
au_
expenditures*Includes prior year
$9,300,000
a
_U
U
Y
L
Design
C
Right of Way
2
Construction $114,000
3
Expense Total $114,000
le
REET Fund 125
N
c
N
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
c
General Fund
m
s
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
Q
State Grants $114,000
=
Unsecured Funding
a�
E
Funding Source Total $114,000
s
r
Q
Packet Pg. 37
CFP/CIP
2024 PW I December 2023 17
D
r�
2 iH[h 99 S[ SW 238th St SW
f
A Q��
240th St SW
Mathay
Batt. 9e'
ios 3 Park
a o n
A a
q 99
c
�c
s
242nd St SW
O_
S_
EdrnontlS wdy
104
. JSth Sr 1•an[h St SNJ N 20Sth St N 20Sth St
243rd PI SW
The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits are from 244th St SW to 238th St. SW. The project will widen the intersection of
Highway 99 and 238th St SW to provide a second northbound left turn lane. Additional improvements will include ADA
compliant sidewalks, a landscaped planter strip to separate sidewalk from adjacent traffic, enhanced street lighting, bike
lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with potential undergrounding of overhead utility
lines).
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this segment of the Hwy 99 corridor.
$32,500,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$1,075,000 $630,000 $409,000
$215,000 $1,000,000 $1,203,000
$13,000,000 $13,752,000
$1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $13,752,000
$1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $6,688,000
$7,064,000
$1,290,000 $1,630,000 $1,612,000 $13,000,000 $13,752,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 18 1 Packet Pg. 38
220th St SW
223rd St SW
224th St SW
3
D
W
C
�e
c
0
m
C
2 220th St SW
224th St SV
3
The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits are from 224th St SW to approximately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW. The project
will widen the intersection of Highway 99 and 220th St. SW to provide a second left turn lane for the northbound,
southbound and westbound movements. Highway 99 corridor improvements will include wider ADA compliant sidewalks,
landscaped planter to separate sidewalk from adjacent traffic, enhanced street lighting, bike lanes, ADA compliant
pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with potential to underground overhead utility lines).
Project Benefit
c
0
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved. a_,
.'
a�
$42,534,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Water Utility Fund 421
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Sewer Utility Fund 423
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
M
U-
U
a_
U
Y
L
$1,075,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $484,000 0
$215,000 $500,000 $3,000,000 $1,885,000
$16,434,000 $16,000,000 3
$1,290,000 $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $2,369,000 $16,434,000 $16,000,000
N
0
N
$642,300 c
m
$29,025 $67,500 $1,020,975 s
v
ca
Q
w
c
M
$1,092,738 $432,500 $1,979,025 E
s
$168,237 $1,000,000 $357,700
$2,369,000 $16,434,000 $16,000,000 Q
$1,290,000 $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $2,369,000 $16,434,000 $16,000,000
19 1 Packet Pg. 39
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
a
a
_216th St Sw
3 3
v W
a'
Q
H
�D
3 G
a 214th St SW V
o�N�
c�
216th St SW -
- - -� 21614
Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street
lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities,
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development will be improved along the
corridor. r_
0
N
Estimated Project Cost
$47,173, 000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000
$500,000
$500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000
$500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000
$500,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000
a
tL
U
a
U
$1,593,000 L
$3,951,000 0
$38,129,000 2
$43,673,000 3
a
N
O
N
1
a�
$43,673,000 E
$43,673,000
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 20 1 Packet Pg. 40
wfi-O&PIlIll
Madrona Ln
+7 ��,A 16 E5PEKANCE
_ 234th St SW
235th PI SW
� 3
s W
>
236th St SW x Q
236th St SW
3 =
< ono
-- --
A
238TH ST SW 3
�i� _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'
3
3
U
O
00 O
238th St SW--
234th St SW
v
a'
ro
236th St SW
s 3
n a
� 3
a'
s
28 th
2
.t
u
Along Hwy 99 from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street `c
lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities,
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. c
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the
corridor.
r-
0
N
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
$21,160,000
a
v_
U
a
- v
Design
$2,275,000 Ile
Right of Way
$1,519,000 0
Construction
$17,366,000 2
Expense Total
$21,160,000 3
a
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
le
REET Fund 125
N
c
N
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
m
General Fund
E
s
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
Q
State Grants
c
Unsecured Funding
a�
$21,160,000 s
Funding Source Total
$21,160,000
r
Q
CFP/CIP
Packet Pg. 41
2024 PW I December 2023
21
t5F'tKANCt +� �r,�L ��la! ��1L 1 �� ~. a Q'
U_ r� IMF' iF a ■ ■ ■■� t >tirrf"i� , r.. !!-
228TH-ST =SW
apa
�• ;
a „ ` 229th St -SW' a_
�t ' "� w r� N7 �� t r■ _ 229ih St SW /
i eiIr.-s f��! i 3r 1 r
r a m h rH SW �l/ c
■■ — — — a0 2$Oth St SW 230 h S zsotn 1�1 I
r
�.� �■LUL
23.1'stlStlSW�
Q "> �. �; r ^y r
w
Q
PMF
� �-
N
�jGo
Ir
C4,�. f
~
_ Holly_ Ln 7 r ± +
t
t1
r.
IWiAMPO `.r
1
111 �'�
233rd St A ir
-10 i
_
■
I room .lA��■F'� ■Ilk
■ _i
,r
q •
a � a
\
6,a
Maple Ln
�■� 41+"
, A 15 Y
v ao
,fir
�Q
rtr
234th St SW
234th St SW
M adrona Ln
A
Along Hwy 99 from 234th St. SW to 228th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street
lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities,
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the
corridor. r_
0
N
Estimated Project Cost
$40,430,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a
LL
U
a
U
$4,254,0013 L
$5,675,000 0
$30,501,0013 2
$40,430,000 3
a
N
O
N
1
az'
$40,430,OOc E
$40,430,000
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 22 1 Packet Pg. 42
up JPr� ti qr
3
J1
�■ .ir
'Elm
■ �� �-
225th PI SW
3 � -
/. 3 ■ �! I iisth PI SW. �f
—9� a
226in st sw 0 �. l
0
00
R . , Is �
.I 81sa+ 'r_-
z !�L 7 Y�
3 - 228TH ST SW`C�
224th St SW
224tfi St SW
in40
12-
i
y
L
a
M
EDMONDS WQ
MOUNTLAKE I^
Ir
a
V
v
226TH PL 3W
-
�
r �
Along Hwy 99 from 228th St. SW to 224th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street
lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities,
landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the
corridor. r-
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
Its
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
0
N
a�
a
IL
U
a
U
$3,596,000 L
$2,439,000 0
$29,207,000 2
$35,242,000 3
a
N
O
N
1
a�
$35,242,000 E
$35,242,000
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 23 1 Packet Pg. 43
J tv Z
E
216th st sW
99
e
Q
t
0
c
220th St SW
c
T
Along Hwy 99 from approximately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW to 216th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on bo
sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential
undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the
corridor. r-
0
N
Estimated Project Cost
$21,277,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
a
u_
U
a
U
$1,978,000 L
$2,159,00c 0
$17,140,000 2
$21,277,000 3
a
N
O
N
1
a�
$21,277,OOc E
$21,277,000
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 24 1 Packet Pg. 44
6.2.a
196TH ST SW
N�
Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in the 2009 Transportation Plan
indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through
N
movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one
N
concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate
c
solution, or as an interim solution until traffic signal warrants are met. The existing LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D).
a
This project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan.
.,
r
ProjectC
C
N
Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase tF
delay along 196th St. SW.
M
a
LL
Estimated Project Cost
ci
a
prior year expendituresv
$1,289,000
Y
L
C
ci
Design $263,000
3
Right of Way $238,000
a
Construction $788,000
N
0
Expense Total $263,000 $238,000 $788,000
N
r
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
_
REET Fund 125
E
E
REET Fund 126
v
Transportation Impact Fees
Q
General Fund
c
Federal Grants
E
State Grants
Unsecured Funding $263,000 $238,000 $788,000
�a
Q
Funding Source Total $263,000 $238,000 $788,000
1 Packet Pg. 45
2024 PW CFPICIP 1 December 2023 25
Bell St
z
aU
Q
00
Anderson
Center n
Field
W Bell St
MAIN ST I♦
Dayton Sty
t1J
>
Q
2
Dayton St
a
Yost Park
Bell
A
Installation of a traffic signal or mini -roundabout. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015
Transportation Plan. The preliminary cost estimate for a new traffic signal is $1,290,000. A conceptual cost estimate for a
mini -roundabout is $500,000.
The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below thi
City's concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B. r_
0
N
Estimated Project Cost
$1,290,000
a
v_
U
a
U
Design
$198,000 L
Right of Way
o
Construction
$1,092,000 2
Expense Total
$198,000 $1,092,000 3
a
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
N
c
N
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
m
General Fund
E
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
s
Federal Grants
Q
State Grants c
M
Unsecured Funding $198,000 $1,092,000 s
Funding Source Total $198,000 $1,092,000
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 26 1 Packet Pg. 46
219th St SW
U � I
N
� m
LO
oo
M Q �—
a 21919
00
a
t Lf
1
220TH ST SW I
W
W
Q 7514
4& ESPERANCE 221st PI SW
WINCO
1;2r_lN*IMNZ--1
Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through/ right turn lane. Add eastbound and westbound dedicated left
turn lanes with a protected -permitted phase. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left
turn phase. (Additional improvements include wider sidewalk, bike lanes, and various utility improvements (including
potential conversion overhead utility lines to underground). ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan .
Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2050 would be improved from LOS F to LOS D.
Improve active transportation conditions for pedestrians and bicycle riders.
$8,700,000
Design
$148,000
$326,100
Right of Way
$502,000
$448,000
Construction
Expense Total
$650,000
$774,100
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
$394,336
$398,729
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$45,000
$45,000
Water Utility Fund 421
$18,000
$18,000
Federal Grants
$192,664
$312,371
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$650,000
$774,100
$50,000
$6,670,000
$50,000 $6,670,000
$12, 500
$37,500
$6,670,000
$50,000 $6,670,000
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 27 1 Packet Pg. 47
quip
226th St
,t -
S�
225thP1SW ■i•
a
S'l
>
-J
Z
"x�.■.
v
L a
a a> a uQ - 226th St SW'
2
>
.o
a,
LO
rn N x R CO , 4 .
- ! CO 0.
�:.'
228th St
-
. a`
. ■ �'
- 228TH ST SW
Octet -fit
a
J
E
i -.c =K� 7 e a" a -1
■ y� ■� • �.� 229th St S,
Q-+�--D
■dJ ■ �-���� . ■
i—". %co, ,
w 230th St
Qe
ti :■
31
0 231 st St S�
W
3_��
_ �2 t
lL t ,00� �31'strSt'■SW
s� __t , li�� ��■ r, Z
y■iniu
0
232nd St
SW�.r
J. !�
7
a
D 5
0 ry
v
Q
2, D ,.�.,. ,� J Q, c
zaznarww m Holly Lnh..L,.:J t'Q -
sett Rd
j
Maple Ln •■-
�mH.
Nottingha Rd
-
v
>
234th St
SW �. a
` may{ 234th St S
o
a a
,: Madrona Ln -_ o
o
Z 235th PI SW a
Q
~2
a '� s N
•89y6
O
1 C
6 > ay! C St/
""F' I�
a
M
-236th St SW 236th St SW 236th�
3
UJ
The project will add a traffic signal adaptive system on a 1.25-mile segment of SR104 from 236th St to 226th St. The syster
will monitor and synchronize the timing of five existing signalized intersections (SR104 @ 236th St, SR104 @ 232nd St, SR1(
@ 95th PI, SR104 @ 100th Ave, SR104 @ 226th St) and improve traffic flows along SR104.
Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor with a current Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of - 25,000 vehicles per day.
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
$4,810,000
Design $186,575
Right of Way
Construction $4,400,000
Expense Total $186,575 $4,400,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- $7,313
REET Fund 125 $25,189 $440,000
REET Fund 126 $440,000
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants $154,073
State Grants
Unsecured Funding $3,520,000
Funding Source Total $186,575 $4,400,000
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 28 1 Packet Pg. 48
E
c
s
c
QFC
PCC NATURAL
MARKET
C,
i
�00
£
�y
Y
76 GA:
a
WALGREEN'S
�Q,
d
PARKING
i
s
BANK
o
_
ry
EDMONDS WAY
w
co O 00 O N co N CD(n
00 O 6) W O OM
N CD
`
co 00 00 co co r� h r_ r-
BANK rnrnrnm mrnrnmrn
Cp }
N
N N
r,r- c
IVAR'S
a
0
~
O
N
BARTELL'S
O
I
�
u
i
Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block pedestrian crossing along 100th Ave. W, improve safety to `c
access the driveways within proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100th Ave. W with the potential addition of bik
lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). c
Improve. .ve active transportation safety.
Estimated Project Cost
$2,5
*Includes prior year expenditures
11 111
EMSEhm2024 2025 2026 2027
Design
$180,000 $195,000 V
Right of Way
$525,000 L
Construction
$1,600,000 O
Expense Total
$180,000 $720,000 $1,600,000 2
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding $180,000 $720,000 $1,600,000 a
Funding Source Total $180,000 $720,000 $1,600,000 t
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023
�a
w
Q
29 Packet Pg. 49
227th p/ � j
227th St
Y O Q
' �o V M
In C
I
I
I 228tn St sw 228TH ST SW
9 rath P� . Z
Qy O c
Westgate 0 a °
�O540
Chapel w w '
�0 c
:i
PU D L
Sub Station y
Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete
Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles. a
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
;,270,000
2027 2028I I I M
ILL
Design $42,000 U
a_
Right of Way U
m
Construction $228,000 le
L
C
Expense Total $42,000 $228,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- 2
REET Fund 125
a
REET Fund 126 le
N
O
Transportation Impact Fees N
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
s
State Grants
0
y°
Unsecured Funding
$42,000 $228,000 Q
w
Funding Source Total
$42,000 $228,000
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 30 1 Packet Pg. 50
a
Y
Y Vi
238th St SW 238TH ST SW,,
0�/ a'
Os
x
lk
N
Korean i
Presbyter Li
Church
Install traffic signal. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015)
Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety.
$1,519,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
'' M-
$227,000 a
u_
U
a_
$1,292,000 U
$227,000 $1,292,000 0
2
3
a
N
O
N
_
m
E
s
$227,000 $1,292,000 ca
$227,000 $1,292,000 Q
w
a�
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
31 1 Packet Pg. 51
Seaview Park Post Office
� a
FQ1
W OD
00' 185th PI SW Q
I � .
2
F-
n
186th St SW?
3
a�
o,
a
it
184th PI SW
p4
s
OLYMPIC V!E►NpR
Lynndale Park i
u
i
Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015
Transportation Plan: #11).
The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City a
concurrency standards (LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
c
0
Estimateda,
prior year expenditures>
a�
$1,347,000
a
u_
a
Design
$230,000 U
Right of Way
L
Construction
$1,117,000 0
Expense Total
$1,347,000 2
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -
a
REET Fund 125
N
REET Fund 126
N
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
m
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
s
Federal Grants
v
ya
State Grants
Q
Unsecured Funding
w
$1,347,000 =
a�
Funding Source Total
$1,347,000 s
ca
r
Q
CFP/CIP
Packet Pg. 52
2024 PW 1 December 2023 32
U
i
w
>
a
UJ
Cn
w
y
So P—'
WD
—
21251A SrSW
3 i
i
Q
Q
��
> C
M
a
z <
aLO
220TH ST SWr=
R
LLI
>
J
a
�
C.
a
=
H
a
W
4
_
�
rn
_
Q
o
�o228TH ST SW
a
228TH Sr
UJ
CO
a
Q >
3LnC
%M
c
2
-
N
236TH ST W
�c
Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side of the street. (part of this project w `c
ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan).
Improve traffic flow, access and active transportation uses by installing a center two way left turn lane, sidewalks, bike IanE a
and street lighting.
c
0
Estimateda,
prior year expenditures>
a�
$17,615,000
a
U-
M
Design
$2,245,000 U
Right of Way
L
Construction
0
$15,370,000 0
Expense Total
$17,615,000 2
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -
a
REET Fund 125
N
REET Fund 126
N
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
m
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
s
Federal Grants
v
ya
State Grants
Q
Unsecured Funding
r
$17,615,000 =
M
Funding Source Total
$17,615,000 s
�a
r
Q
CFP/CIP
Packet Pg. 53
2024 PW I December 2023
33
Seattle W 243rd PI SW Lake
Baptist > Ballinger
4Q Church Q
tilp� F H
Os,�MONO
11, s wA Y
�Nt20.51H ST
- �z N 205TH ST
W
N 204TH PL -§� ���4TH PL a Z
Z
0 0
_ 0 C� N
N z 3o RD p J a
Q
� - e
Add a second westbound left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor
Analysis (completed in 2015).
Improve access, safety and delay at the intersection.
$3,424,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
c
0
N
d
- LL
$510,000 a
U
0
$2,914,000 L
0
$3,424,000 �:
2
3
a
N
O
N
c
m
E
s
ca
$3,424,000 Q
w
$3,424,000
E
s
�a
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 34 1 Packet Pg. 54
";�
O
DALE BEgC
N'�'O
174th St SW
69
v
O(0)4
2p
4W#
\Z
Q
"sth p,swe
o`
I �
a�
a�
�a
173rd PI SW
7�3rd St SW
174th St SW
St. Thomas
Moore School
A
Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50' storage length. Shift the northbound lanes to the east tc
provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay
(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13)
Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street.
c
0
ProjectEstimated
2
prior year expenditures
>
a�
$715,000
a
u_
a
Design
$120,000 U
Right of Way
L
Construction
0
$595,000 0
Expense Total
$715,000 2
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -
a
REET Fund 125
N
REET Fund 126
N
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
m
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
s
Federal Grants
v
ya
State Grants
Q
Unsecured Funding
w
$715,000 =
a�
Funding Source Total
$715,000 s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 35 1 Packet Pg. 55
� � 1
J1 ■
Ow'" M%-NM
175th St SW
Snohomish
,...—, o_..1.
The project will stabilize the roadway subgrade and embankment and rebuild the damaged pavement on 175th St. SW
Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankment.
9 C
<
im
prior expenditures0
$1,000,000
cn
N
Project Cost
2024 2025I 127
2028 2029I I M
Design
�
U
Right of Way
a
Construction
$1,000,000
U
Expense Total
$1,000,000
c
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
.2
REET Fund 126
3
a
Transportation Impact Fees
N
General Fund
0
N
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
4)
E
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$1,000,000
Funding Source Total
$1,000,000
Q
w
a�
E
s
ca
r
Q
CFP/CIP
Packet Pg. 56
2024 PW 1 December 2023
36
6.2.a
This program started in 2019 and will provide new signal upgrades, such as vehicle detection at intersections, new
vehicle/pedestrian head equipment and other signal -related upgrades. These improvements will improve the safety of the
City's transportation system.
Improve reliabilityof traffic signal operation.
Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
$30,290
P
Design
$500
Right of Way
Construction
$29,790
Expense Total
$30,290
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$30,290
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$30,290
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 37 1 Packet Pg. 57
6.2.a
The City Council added this study to the 2023-2028 CFP-CIP during the 2023 budget deliberations and postponed the study
for future discussion. This study will re-evaluate alternatives identified in the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Alternative Access
Study and potential new alternatives for improving the reliability of emergency responses to the Waterfront.
Both through and stopping trains can simultaneously block Main Street and Dayton Street impacting emergency response r
times to the Waterfront. The many amenities along the Edmonds Waterfront (including the new Waterfront/Senior Center
c
dive park, marina, whale watching service, off leash dog park, restaurants, etc.) on the west side of the BNSF train tracks ar
drawing an increasing number of visitors —meaning the potential for accidents and health emergencies is ever-increasing.
The study will develop potential solutions to address this issue.
X
a
Estimated Project Cost
LL
ci
a
prior year expendituresv
$50,000
Y
L
0
ci
Planning
Expense Total
a
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax &
le
c
REET Fund 125
N
REET Fund 126
r
Z
c
Transportation Impact Fees
E
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Q
Federal Grants
State Grants
E
Unsecured Funding
�a
Funding Source Total
er
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 38 1 Packet Pg. 58
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
39 1 1 Packet Pg. 59
WIVIUNION WAY
■
A
d �.
v
a
r
lu
a
Q
o,
2
O
O
y
�S
e �
L' a
2' r Pi s,v
v
a'
rn
233rd St SW
v
Q
L
1 a
Q
234th St SW
tSNtKANU
t
s
_ r�■ t
„ Ll�i c
3
Q231st St SW IL r�►40 �l►`�� <
O we ■
9�3ti�
232nd St SW _
3
v
Q
m
2.34th Pi
32nd PI y
Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranked #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 `c
Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
a
Estimated Project r. *Includes
c
0
prior year expenditures
to
$1,856,000
to
- a
IL
Design
$284,000
U
a_
Right of Way
U
Construction
to
$1,572,000 le
L
Expense Total
$284,000
C
$1,572,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
2
REET Fund 125
a
REET Fund 126
N
Transportation Impact Fees
O
N
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
s
State Grants
y°
Unsecured Funding
$284,000
$1,572,000 Q
w
Funding Source Total
$284,000
$1,572,000
E
s
to
r
Q
CFP/CIP
Packet Pg. 60
2024 PW I December 2023 40
•��~••�� iviaarona
Elementary School
236th St
Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W. This project ranked #4
Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
•:: 111
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$296,000
$1,692,000
$296,000 $1,692,000
$296,000 $1,692,000
$296,000 $1,692,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 41 1 Packet Pg. 61
e
q � E
>
Q
LLI
-
Q
2
0
236th St
D a a
� � s
0000
>
00
Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$1,937,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
c
0
N
d
- LL
$276,000 a
U
$1,661,000 L
0
$1,937,000 �:
2
3
a
N
O
N
c
m
E
s
ca
$1,937,000 Q
w
$1,937,000
E
s
�a
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 42 1 Packet Pg. 62
�
7�Jrt
1 ESPERANCE N
•� °0
f �*'sw
' �
J
z
z
�m
16 _
234th St SW
234th St
SIS-
H
Q
M c;,
PARK
EDM ONDS
WHIRLY
BALL
o
v
APTS
W
Rs
i I earn ` w
Christ " LL
NORTH
88
■r0�
235th
3
o
Lutheran
HAVEN
MANOR w "
�� d *� 60 Ama,
a
RIST LUTHERAN q
L
CHURCH -hurch
TRAILER
230h St SIN
236th St SW
Park and Ride 236th StESW 3�
COURT s
236th St SW
23601
23603 SAFEWAY @ '
J
y
•�
2,. .
23605 L KJIHG CF
23607 M-N F SUNSET
a
QN
n ICJ
23619 0 i
P
WILLOW
LL
PARK PL
o
0
CONDOS BROOK
'9 B1-10
D APT F
uJ
R AURORA
23701-32
o oLYMPIC
m EDWINDS WATER Ile
C E
S MARKETPLACE
m CRE
ST
B G
Q
T
78L
cj Q
A
=
U FAMILY PANCAKE
J
N
8901 m
238th St SW
H
238TH
H
ST SW 00
V "7-11"
u �o�o� o
-
238th St SW
23800
2380423810
_
A I SI
SEOUL" �F�_
4
�■ !
v '; Ar
The walkway project proposed approximately 1,000 LF of new sidewalk on the east side of 84th Ave W with ADA
compliant pedestrian curb ramps.
City Council has programmed $75,000 in 2024 to complete preliminary design. The City Council will evaluate the project
cost (anticipated in 2nd qtr of 2024) after the preliminary design is completed and decide whether to fund final design.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$1,510,000
Design
$160,000
Right of Way
Construction
$1,350,000
Expense Total
$160,000
$1,350,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$37,500
REET Fund 126
$37,500
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$85,000
$1,350,000
Funding Source Total
$160,000
$1,350,000
r
C
O
N
d
u
a
LL
0
a
v
Y
L
O
_v
a
N
CD
N
r
c
d
E
t
t�
r
r
Q
c
d
E
t
0
M
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 43 1 Packet Pg. 63
a
��206th St -SW
Q -- -
m
v co
207th
St
�
1
z°8t''-5,
`°
a
LYNNWOOD 208TH
�
i
a
EDMONDS -
ST SW
208th PI SV
D
s
Lu
;
PI SW
o
Q
f
a
v
�
i
C
O
Y
210th St SlM
sW
Q
a
a'
a'
i
v
P
c
s a
m
Gi
�_
E
>
a
--
co
^
v
N -
i
a
E
-
212TH ST SW
L
L---
m
r
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
The improvements will improve active transportation safety (including for school kids due to proximity of several schools). Q
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
$1,582,000
. .1 2024I I26 2027 2028I I I LaL
Design $110,000 $120,000 V
a_
Right of Way V
rn
Construction $1,352,000 L
0
Expense Total $110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000 3:
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- 2
REET Fund 125
a
REET Fund 126
N
O
Transportation Impact Fees N
General Fund
r
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Z
Federal Grants
t
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
r
$110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000 Q
Funding Source Total
$110,000 $120,000 $1,352,000 y
E
t
�a
w
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 44 1 Packet Pg. 64
0LYM
`180th St
��•.
-
�
SW
,day,
05
181st PI SW
Q�
3
2nd St SW
I
PI SW
m a
Q
�
3
a
a
.p a
f
n
w
-
e Way
�d9 '2
Q
84th S
Q
° 184th St SW
o
e
s
2
~
a
co
00
V
I
185th PI SW
O/�
A�b ��
o
_
186th St SW P
87th PI SW
v
LYNNWOOD
I
3
'
a 187th St SW
L a a
t
a' `, I
d
oco
C0 _Q
188th St SW-_
97th PI SW�
_--187th
I
Pi SW
188th PI SW
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #13 in Long Walkway List of the 2015
Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety. a
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
$2,333,000
I M
I ILL
Design $482,000 U
a_
Right of Way U
w
Construction $1,851,000 �
L
C
Expense Total $482,000 $1,851,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- 2
REET Fund 125
a
REET Fund 126 le
N
O
Transportation Impact Fees N
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
s
State Grants
0
y°
Unsecured Funding
$482,000 $1,851,000 Q
w
Funding Source Total
$482,000 $1,851,000
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 45 1 Packet Pg. 65
em a nta ry
Chase Lake
School
Q
c
N
00
216th St SW3
a i
a�
0
00
-Edmonds Woodway High
School
> Swedis
?r Edmorn
W
Q
2
St
00
W N d s
7
> a 9 ve W
9 u, s
_ `L 219th St SW
n. S' N
GO = —
Edmonds
kNCE Church of God 220TH ST SW F_
A
Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
The improvements will improve pedestrian safety.
$1,738,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$264,000
$1,474,000
$264,000 $1,474,000
$264,000 $1,474,000
$264,000 $1,474,000
c
0
N
d
a
u_
U
a_
U
L
0
2
3
a
N
O
N
c
m
E
s
0
ca
Q
w
c
a�
E
s
0
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 46 1 Packet Pg. 66
THE MARINER
Alder St
w COMMODORE
¢w
Q
w O
o
c
N
�KEGORY
+�
Q
Holly Dr
J
�3
0
6.2.a
E
s
c
3140 f
Cedar St N i
u
i
Install sidewalk on the south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S. This project is ranked #9 in the Short Walkway `c
List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch.Estimated
Q
Project• *Includes
r
_
O
prior year expenditures
$290,000
_N
d
u
Project Cost -
- a
LL
Design
$50,000
V
a_
Right of Way
V
Construction
$240,000
Y
L
Expense Total
$290,000
O
3:
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
2
REET Fund 125
a
REET Fund 126
N
Transportation Impact Fees
O
N
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
r
Federal Grants
State Grants
t
Unsecured Funding
$290,000
v
r
r
Funding Source Total
$290,000
Q
c
su
E
t
sa
w
Q
2024 CFPICIP 2023
Packet Pg. 67
PW I December 47
MCDONALD'S
4NT
a
a
STEVENS
COURT AEGIS
VALUE O�
Swedish
-----
VILLA GEO
Edmonds
216th St SW
EDMONDS
q�
MEDICAL
PAVILION
21605
KRUGER
CLINIC
=N'S
rH
ER
216th St S W
O
.1�0
N
OJT
Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of
216th St. SW). This project is ranked #3 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
To provide a safe and desirable walking route.
$220,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
im
$33,000
$187,000
$220,000
$220,000
$220,000
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 48 1 Packet Pg. 68
rpv
The project will add bike lanes or sharrows on the following streets:
• 100th Ave/9th Ave from 244th St to Walnut St
• Walnut/Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave to 84th Ave
• 228th St. from 76th Ave to 80th Ave
• Bike sharrows on 80th Ave from 228th St. to 220th St.
Pedestrian crossing improvements including curb ramps, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) and signing will be
installed at 100th Ave & 224th St, 9th Ave & Pine St, Bowdoin Way& 96th Ave and Bowdoin Way & Pioneer Way. The proje
is currently in the construction phase and completion will be subject to available weather in Fall 2023. Staff assumes grant
funds will be spent in 2023. Project close-out is scheduled for 2024.
This project will create new bike connections to various destination points throughout the City (such as schools, parks,
Downtown, Sound Transit Station). Sound Transit awarded the grant to fund improvements that will provide more
convenient access so that more people can use Sound Transit services.
$3,000,000
Project Cost
Design
Right of Way
Construction
$15,000
Expense Total
$15,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$10,095
REET Fund 126
$4,905
Funding Source Total
$15,000
r
0
N
u
a
LL
ci
a
v
v,
Y
L
0
_2
a
N
O
N
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 49 1 Packet Pg. 69
a
_CASP-ERS ST
- -- —
------200th-St-SW,
-
il
z
3
a' 4r
Mountain Ln z
Vista PI
a
>
a
$o
3 m
>
L
¢
c
a
�
201,� PI SW
CO�
Q
b-P
Z Carol Way
�202nd St SW-
a 7
ha St
SLLJ ierra PI
a
v
-o
j
W
= n
Z 2nd PI SW Q'
_
h
>
>
a - a
Q
H Glen St
Glen St U Q
s
^ °
O+
D a\e
N
St SWco
p
20a
m
z
1O
-'04 h
Daley St Daley St
J
10,
.3
a
O
W
-
SPI-i-si Sprague St
PIN
205th PI SW
a n
�
co
-
„ias St Edmonds St
EdmL,ndl sr Edmonds St
c�
m
c'
>�,--206th St SW�
o
3
Bell St
Fm�,at��lls
Bell St
o x207th
1207thPI SW
St
N a
a
m
N
- -- - - -
- - MAIN ST-
-
-
- -
208th PI SW
Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW (— 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW
from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan).
Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW and Main St., by encouraging kids t r
use non -motorized transportation to walk to / from school. c
N
Estimated Project Cost
$ 2, 951, 000
a
u_
V
a
v
Design
$220,000 $220,000 Y
L
Right of Way
o
Construction
$2,511,000 V
Expense Total
$220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000 3
a
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
N
CD
N
REET Fund 126
r
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
E
t
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
r
Federal Grants
r
Q
State Grants c
m
Unsecured Funding $220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000 t
Funding Source Total $220,000 $220,000 $2,511,000 M
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 50 1 Packet Pg. 70
pally - - 220TH ST SW --
F� a NW r�+� f.
0 V ■ •' OPY
a c m
a Z IN
C F
m � G W Re-
0 N
'-
'' W y r
W
zz, s,
Q
s M a Ik 4-
co
7
it � �►��;�� r� �'
3 D ��R •v r 4' ~
224th St SW ati
224th StIn
sw 3
Q1 �z
Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 22Oth St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in the LonE
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$862,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$131,000
$731,000
$131,000 $731,000
$131,000 $731,000
$131,000 $731,000
r
C
O
N
d
u
a
LL
ci
a
v
Y
L
O
_2
a
N
O
N
c
d
E
t
r
Q
c
m
E
t
0
M
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 51 1 Packet Pg. 71
a Seattle : 243rd PI SW
Baptist W Lake
FQMo 0 Church Q Ballinger
QMo
/VOS tv t•
AY
N 205TH' SiTiil�i •
N 205TH ST
z
N 204TH PL Q 204TH PL a Z
Z W
0 Q >
z Q
NERD p� I a W O�i02N�
, -n�ao sr m
Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners
and new ADA curb ramps.
Improve active transportation safety along this section of the Interurban Trail and across SR-104.
$1, 571, 000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$261,000
$1,310,000
$261,000 $1,310,000
$261,000 $1,310,000
$261,000 $1,310,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 52 1 Packet Pg. 72
Edmonds
Marsh
a
0
(z�
O �
O
W
0
3:L
W
y Holly Dr
Howell Way— f Pr jp- J Magndia
F1 * s
HanHand Ot.
19 Jr a
'.ffI Hemlock Way
NCa
� Erb en Dr v7 1n
Q cc Seamont Ln
a
ine St
0
JJL— Forsyth Ln 0
a'
s
Fir PI
Cedar St Cedar St
a i
i
Spruce Si p
Spruce St
Spruce P; S
to
Hemlock Si w
Laurel V, a
v
a Laurel St N ~
L > o
L II
00
ine S,
a a �
f
N
Fir St LI
'I i
Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb ramps along SR-104 from the HAWK signal to Pine St and along Pine St from SR-104 I `e
9th Ave S
This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along 3rd Ave. S to Downtown Edmonds an Q
City Park.
r
C
O
Estimated Project Cost
.y
prior . .
>
N
$3,276,000
IL
u_
a
Design
$546,000 t�
Right of Way
L
Construction
$2,730,000 00
Expense Total
$3,276,000 2
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi -
IL
REET Fund 125
N
REET Fund 126
CD
N
Transportation Impact Fees
r
General Fund
=
d
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
t
Federal Grants
r
State Grants
r
Q
Unsecured Funding
$3,276,000 a�
Funding Source Total
$3,276,000 s
ca
r
Q
2024 CFPICIP 2023
Packet Pg. 73
PW I December
53
Sierra
°�
Park
o
ti
0
<
00
0
�,
E
<
st St EsUV
r`
O
V,
i
300
c
I
WOJ
J
pp
�s
nd St S1N
,��
r e ■
�:���
�
W
�
>
c
a
tiffs
ILI
192nd N SW
Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
Q
Estimated Project C. *Includes
c
0
prior year expenditures
$719,000
d
a
v_
Design
$106,000 a
Right of Way
U
Construction
w
$613,000 L
Expense Total
0
$719,000 �:
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi
2
REET Fund 125
a
REET Fund 126
N
Transportation Impact Fees
O
N
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
s
State Grants
y°
Unsecured Funding
$719,000 Q
w
Funding Source Total
$719,000
E
s
�a
r
Q
CFP/CIP
Packet Pg. 74
2024 PW I December 2023 54
a
J
T
r
♦ r � I �
aobin Hood DrJ%
J �
P
n Fr),, pa
E
Q'Ln
?:Z
MO
O:E
�Lu
w
232nd St SW
Salem
Edmonds Lutheran
Heights Church
K-12
Scriber Lake ■ , ;r
High School" _
LLJ -
a
ost.� Hickman
236th PI
SW
z
o
:2 Park
a
�' N
73'1ih pj
SW
Edmonds
Faith
Memorial ?
237th P
Community
238tn St sw
Cemetery
rk.—k
2at� St
Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th Ave. W, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #10 in tr `c
Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
$1,124,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
0
N
N
G'
1126 2027• - a
u-
$170,000 a
U
w
$954,000 L
0
$1,124,000
$1,124,000
3
a
N
O
N
E
El
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 55 1 Packet Pg. 75
Public Works - Transportation
80th Ave W from 218th St SW to 220th St SW
�If2-20�TiH�SiT�S1W�
Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 22Oth ST. SW, with curb and gutter. This project ranked #7 in the
Short Walkway List of the 201S Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$344,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
r
C
O
N
d
LL
$63,000 a
V
$281,000 i
O
$344,000 3:
_2
a
N
O
N
Z
c
d
E
t
r
$344,000 Q
$344,000 m
E
s
�a
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 56 1 Packet Pg. 76
Public Works - Transportation
84th Ave W from 188th St SW to 186th St SW
I =a -
186th St SW m
,I PI SW
s
4
r
Ln
00
L 188th St SW
Seaview00
Elementary f.
187th St SW
A
Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Shor
Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
$348,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
r
C
O
N
d
LL
$53,000 a
V
$295,000 L
O
$348,000 3:
_2
a
N
O
N
Z
c
d
E
t
r
$348,000 Q
$348,000 m
E
s
�a
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 57 1 Packet Pg. 77
lit
OD
��
2.38th St SW
Q 00
o f� W C
C
i
0-
S� a
c
s L Q� r
&L 0 � �r N
00
2401h St SW 3 Mathay `L u
Ballinger
Park t
Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 <
Transportation Plan.
This project would improve pedestrian safety.
a
Estimated Project C. *Includes
c
0
prior year expenditures
T)
$1,363,000
d
- a
v_
Design
$199,000
U
a_
Right of Way
U
Construction
$1,164,000
w
le
L
Expense Total
$199,000
$1,164,000
0
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
2
REET Fund 125
a
REET Fund 126
N
Transportation Impact Fees
O
N
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
s
State Grants
y°
Unsecured Funding
$199,000
$1,164,000
Q
w
Funding Source Total
$199,000
$1,164,000
E
s
=a
r
Q
CFP/CIP
Packet Pg. 78
2024 PW I December 2023
58
f
Cn
7th and C Ave °' W
Vista PI Q
Elm Park
2
H
Elm St ON
s
F CO
W
Elm PI a° ~
� O
O
p°A/ar Goy° T
Q'k
220TH ST SW
3: 3:
a a
L L
rn 00
rn 0%
A
The walkway project is ranked #6 on the short walkway list from the 2015 Transportation Plan. The project will install
approximately 700 feet of new sidewalk, six pedestrian curb ramps and modify the existing stormwater system on Elm Wa)
between 8th Ave. S and 9th Ave. S. This project will complete an important missing sidewalk link.
The project is currently in the construction phase and completion will be subject to available weather in Fall 2023. Project a
close-out is scheduled for 2024.
c
Project Benefit O
N
The project will improve pedestrian safety and provide a missing link of sidewalk on Elm Way between 8th Ave and 9th Ave
(L
u_
L)
a
$1,100,000 v
Project11 •
124 2025
20261 128 2029 2030-44L
O
Design
0_
Right of Way
3
Construction
$10,000
a
le
Expense Total
$10,000
0
N
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
'
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
$6,000
m
E
Transportation Impact Fees
L
ca
General Fund
Q
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$4,000
Funding Source Total
$10,000
E
L
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 59 1 Packet Pg. 79
6.2.a
S
This program started in 2019 and will provide pedestrian safety improvements, such as RRFB's and flashing LED's around
stop signs. These improvements will improve the safety of the City's transportation system.
Improve safety at pedestrian crossings.
$80,770
r
Mnr-�
LDesign
$1,000
Right of Way
Construction
$79,770
Expense Total
$80,770
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
$80,770
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total $80,770
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 60 1 Packet Pg. 80
Final design of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to include site design and construction documents for a safe, pedestrian
friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N
between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concept was developed
includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", as well as preliminary design development through 2020-21.
Funding for this project has not been secured at this time. The 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Project is managed by the
Community Services/Economic Development Department.
The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic and provide a strong visual connecti(
between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor and
contribute to the economic vitality in downtown. The project has been supported by the community in the 2014 Communii
Cultural Plan and in the goals and priorities for the State certified Creative District. This project is supported by the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan.
$9,206,600
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax &
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
General Fund
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$1,000,000 $500,000
$500,000
$6,000,000
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000
$1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
61 1 Packet Pg. 81
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
W Da ton St_ -
-- Y_ _--
--
Dayton St
-
Dayton St
D'Syton St
Puget Sound
G
Q
i
N
>
Maple St
a
Alder St
I
�
Alder St
a
tq
N
r
w
"
w
Q --
Walnut_st
.
Edmonds Marsh
m
u) Holly Dr
c
Howell Way
N
U�O7
U)
H om ela.6 D r
>
L
o„COS
_
3
a>
dy
�
Erben
o
r
Dr
Hemlock
Way
0
W
Seamont Lr
Modify existing lane channelization on SR1O4 to add vehicle storage for ferry users.
Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways.
mcmues prior year expenunures
:1 111
raiect Cnst 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030_44
Design
$57,000
Lai
Right of Way
U
Li
Construction
$323,000
U
Expense Total
$380,000
w
c
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
.2
REET Fund 126
3
a
Transportation Impact Fees
N
General Fund
0
N
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
E
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
$380,000
Funding Source Total
$380,000
Q
w
a�
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 63 1 Packet Pg. 83
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
64 1 1 Packet Pg. 84
6.2.a
Install traffic calming devices along selected stretches throughout the City with speeding issues (through completion of
detailed evaluation). This ongoing annual program started in 2015 and is included in the City's 6-year Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that qualify under the City's Traffic Calming Policy.
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
$100,000 (2024)
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023
r
0
N
d
IL
u_
2029 2030-44q
a
v
Y
L
$22,000 $330,000 0
$22,000 $330,000 v
a
N
$100,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $33O,00a N
_
d
t
t�
0
r
r
Q
r
_
m
$100,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $330,000 s
�a
Q
65 Packet Pg. 85
$11,000
$89,000 $22,000
$100,000 $22,000
$22,000 $22,000 $22,000
$22,000 $22,000 $22,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
The 2017 Transition Plan completed an ADA evaluation and prioritization of the City's street right-of-way. This decision
package will update the 2017 plan and expand the evaluation to include City Buildings and Parks facilities. The Plan will
inventory physical barriers preventing accessibility and develop actions and preliminary cost estimates to address ADA non
compliance.
Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City right of way, as well as City buildings and parks facilities.
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
� � 1 111
Design $440,000
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total $440,000
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi- $105,000
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
General Fund $335,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Federal Grants
State Grants
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total $440,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 67 1 Packet Pg. 87
The Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan and is being updated in
coordination with the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update. Based upon existing and projected future land use and travel
patterns, the Transportation Plan describes street, pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure and services and provides
assessment of existing and projected future transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportation priorities and
guides the development of the six -year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital Improvement Program (CIP) an
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The plan was last updated in 2015.
The Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The
Transportation Plan is being updated in coordination with the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update. Based upon existing and
projected future land use and travel patterns, the Transportation Plan describes roadway pedestrian, bicycle and transit
infrastructure and services and provides an assessment of existing and projected future transportation needs. The Plan will
establish the transportation priorities and guides the development of the six -year Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP), Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and introduce Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS).
$406,000
Planning
$236,085
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
$236,085
Street Fund 112 - Gas Tax & Multi-
$236,085
REET Fund 125
REET Fund 126
Transportation Impact Fees
Funding Source Total
$236,085
r
C
O
y
a�
IL
LL
q
a
v
Y
L
O
ci
a
le
N
O
N
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 68 1 Packet Pg. 88
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
The City of Edmonds proposes the development of this project to demonstrate how green infrastructure can both address
stormwater flows and enhance the streetscapes to benefit the Hwy 99 neighborhood and the downtown core.
This project includes the following elements:
• Roadway narrowing to reduce traffic speeds and to reduce impervious surface (vehicular capacity retained)
• Sidewalks and planting strips added
• Bioretention cells collect runoff from the road through curb cuts
• Bioretention cells collect runoff directly from sidewalks
• Public private partnership potential with Housing Hope and Terrace Place developments.
Incorporating green streets into the urban fabric of the City of Edmonds is intended to demonstrate how trees, vegetation,
engineered green stormwater solutions, physical and visual narrowing of vehicular lane widths, and shortening pedestrian
crossings with curb bulbs help to slow traffic, ameliorate climate change impacts, and reinforce desired land use and
transportation patterns on appropriate street rights -of -way. This project is intended to increase the livability of a diverse,
growing city.
$3,500,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$350,000
$3,150,000
$3,500,000
$3,500,000
$3,500,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 70 1 Packet Pg. 90
6.2.a
PROJECT.-
2024
2025
20261
128
2029
(2024-2029)
2030-44In
COST aD
PWW-01
2024 WL Overlay
27
$225,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$225,000
$0
$225,000 0
LL
PWW-02
Phase 13 Annual Replacement Program (2023)
30
$10,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,000
$0
$10,000 :a
m
PWW-03
Phase 14 Annual Replacement Program (2024)
31
$3,300,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,300,000
$0
$3,300,000 L)
N
O
PWW-04
Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program (2025)
25
$426,000
$3,666,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,092,000
$0
$4,092,000
N
O
PWW-05
Phase 16 Annual Replacement Program (2026)
$0
$547,000
$3,813,000
$0
$0
$0
$4,360,000
$0
$4,360,000 C
a-
O
PWW-06
Phase 17 Annual Replacement Program (2027)
$0
$0
$569,000
$3,966,000
$0
$0
$4,535,000
$0
$4,535,000 Q
PWW-07
Phase 18 Annual Replacement Program (2028)
$0
$0
$0
$592,000
$4,124,000
$0
$4,716,000
$0
r
$4,716,000 r_
O
.y
PWW-08
Phase 19 Annual Replacement Program (2029)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$616,000
$4,289,000
$4,905,000
$0
$4,905,000 >
PWW-09
Phase 20 Annual Replacement Program (2030)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$641,000
$641,000
$102,677,000
$103,318,000 d
& Future Programs
U
PWW-11
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades
26
$850,000
$4,500,000
$3,850,000
$0
$0
$0
$9,200,000
$0
$9,200,000 U
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
$4,811,000
$8,713,000
$8,232,000
$4,558,000
$4,740,000
$4,930,000
$35,984,000
$102,677,000
'D
$138,661,OOa i
O
C.1
SOURCEFUNDING
124
2025
20261
128
2029
TOTAL
2030-44•
.0
(2024-2029)
a
Water Fund -421
$4,811,000
$8,713,000
$8,232,000
$4,558,000
$4,740,000
$4,930,000
$35,984,000
$102,677,000
$138,661,OOC N
O
N
r
r
C
d
t
V
R
r.+
r
Q
C
N
t
V
r
a�
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 72 1 Packet Pg. 92
Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the project will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at
various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone tc
breakage due to its material properties. Road pavement overlays will cover areas of roadways that were excavated and
patched in previous years as part of the Waterline Replacement Projects.
Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to the Annual Waterline Replaceme c
Projects. N
d
I nclu des prior year expenditures a
U-
$225,000 _U
a
U
Project Cost 2024 2025 2026 2027• • • • Ul
Y
L
Design $20,000 C
Right of Way 2
Construction $205,000
3
Expense Total $225,000 le
N
Water Fund 421 $225,000 c
N
Funding Source Total $225,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 73 1 Packet Pg. 93
Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at
various locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone tc
breakage due to its material properties.
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of breakages and
r
leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. _
0
N
Estimated Project Cost
$2.1 to $4.9 million/year a
LL
0
a
V
Design $461,000 $547,000 $569,000 $592,000 $616,000 $641,000 $13,348,O1C L
Right of Way o
Construction $3,525,000 $3,666,000 $3,813,000 $3,966,000 $4,124,000 $4,289,000 $89,328,990 2
Expense Total $3,986,000 $4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $102,677,000 3
IL
Water Fund 421 $3,736,000 $4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $1O2,677,OOC q
N
Funding Source Total $3,736,000 $4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $102,677,000 N
c
d
E
t
v
r
r
Q
c
m
E
t
�a
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 74 1 Packet Pg. 94
Yost Park
�► 'W%
185th PI SW Q
0
rn
�db
186th PI SW Seaview
Water Tank
W
Q
2
00
00
This work is being done to provide structural upgrades, repair leakages, and upgrades to our two underground potable wat
storage reservoirs. Preliminary findings completed in early 2023 were used to determine order of magnitude/preliminary
costs and next steps for the now planned repairs and upgrades project. The Yost Reservoir report shows that it will need a
major structural and seismic retrofit, plus repairs to address leakage from the reservoir. The report for the Seaview
Reservoir shows similar issues as the Yost Reservoir, with a less serious leakage issue.
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of leakage, retrofit
structures so that they meet current structural codes to improve their resiliency during earthquakes, and decrease overall
day to day maintenance costs.
$9,659,430
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Water Fund 421
Funding Source Total
$850,000 $650,000
$3,850,000
$3,850,000
$850,000 $4,500,000
$3,850,000
$850,000 $4,500,000
$3,850,000
$850,000 $4,500,000
$3,850,000
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 75 1 Packet Pg. 95
00,
\` �. +, _ ,�• '_ .,, 1. ." f ter..it
6.2.a
O
IL
c
O
N
O
Q
E
� r
Q
• O
U
ca
C
m
FL
N
6.2.a
STORMWATER
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration Related
Projects
PWD-01
X Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements
34
$90,000
$644,843
$0
$0
$0
$0
$734,843
$0
$734,8
LL
Perrinville Creek Basin Projects
PWD-03
Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects
41
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$100,000
$600,000
$1,400,000
$2,000,C tQo
U
PWD-04
X Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Phase 1
35
$275,000
$4,105,000
$3,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$7,380,000
$0
$7,380,C N
0
N
PWD-23
Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update
38
$594,390
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$594,390
$0
$594,2
N
O
Storm Drainage Improvement Projects
N
PWD-06
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility Design & Construction
$0
$0
$200,000
$3,000,000
$0
$0
$3,200,000
$0
a
$3,200,C 0
PWD-22
7317 Lake Ballinger Way Floodplain Purchase &
43
$120,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$120,000
$0
$120,C Q
Structure Removal
r
Annually Funded Projects
c
PWD-11
Phase 4 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2023)
42
$1,377,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,377,000
$0
$1,377,C A
d
PWD-12
Phase 5 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2024)
36
$324,000
$1,687,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,011,000
$0
$2,011,C
a
PWD-13
Phase 6 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2025)
$0
$337,000
$1,755,000
$0
$0
$0
$2,092,000
$0
$2,092,C U
a
PWD-14
Phase 7 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2026)
$0
$0
$351,000
$1,825,000
$0
$0
$2,176,000
$0
$2,176,C U
PWD-15
Phase 8 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2027)
$0
$0
$0
$365,000
$1,898,000
$0
$2,263,000
$0
rn
$2,263,C C
PWD-16
Phase 9 Annual Storm Replacement Project (2029)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$380,000
$1,974,000
$2,354,000
$0
$2,354,C
PWD-18
Phase 10 Annual Storm Replacement (2030) &
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$395,000
$395,000
$49,360,000
$49,755,C
Future Projects
a
PWD-19
2024 SD Overlays
39
$315,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$315,000
$0
$315,C N
N
Compliance Related Projects
r
PWD-17
Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan
37
$350,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$350,000
$0
$350,C
d
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
$3,545,390
$6,873,843
$5,406,000
$5,290,000
$2,378,000
$2,469,000
$25,962,233
$50,760,000
$76,722,2 t
v
SOURCEFUNDING
124
2025
20261
128
2029
TOTALco
2030-44•
r
1 1
Q
Stormwater Utility Fund - 422
$2,871,750
$3,683,611
$3,156,000
$3,040,000
$2,378,000
$2,469,000
$17,598,361
$50,760,000
$68,358,3 c
ARPA Funds
$114,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$114,000
$0
$114,C E
Secured Grants
$524,450
$575,632
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,100,082
$0
$1,100,C v
City of Lynnwood
$35,190
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$35,190
$0
cc
$35,1 Q
Unsecured Grants
$0
$2,614,600
$2,250,000
$2,250,000
$0
$0
$7,114,600
$0
$7,114,6uu
TOTAL REVENUE
$3,545,390
$6,873,843
$5,406,000
$5,290,000
$2,378,000
$29469,000
$259962,233
$50,
Packet Pg. 97
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
77
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
78
raLneL ry. ZVo
Public Works - Stormwater
Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements
Edmonds Marsh �•
Q
N
0
Z
L o
WI
Wildlife
Refuge
City Park
Howell Way
T
—0—M
a A i iW
�t
I_1
The project will be improving water quality of stormwater runoff by replacing existing catch basins along the west side of &
104 funded via a DOE grant and on the east side of SR-104 via a state funded appropriation. The catch basins will be
replaced with catch basins that include water filter cartridges. Staff proposes this effort in order to provide water quality
mitigation for all discharges that directly enter the marsh from these locations.
Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the west portions of SR-104 located near tl o
marsh. The improvements will provide better habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh.
d
prior year expendituresLL
$876,000
U_
a
U
w
Design
$90,000
L
0
Right of Way
2
Construction
$644,843
Expense Total
$90,000
$644,843
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$11,250
$69,211
N
c
N
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
$78,750
$575,632
c
Unsecured Grants
d
E
Funding Source Total
$90,000
$644,843
w
Q
c
d
E
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 79 1 Packet Pg. 99
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
80 1 1 Packet Pg. 100
6.2.a
Reducing scouring flows to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified in a previous basin report completed ii
2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The project! N
CD
funded by this program are incremental steps toward recovering this stream run as adequate fish habitat. These efforts ha) N
become even more critical given recent challenges around the Perrinville Creek outfall area. This program is a fund for
r
o
implementing projects within the Perrinville Creek basin to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allows staff flexibility to
Q
respond to ad -hoc opportunities such as rain garden cluster projects, or ensure matching funds are available for chasing
grant applications for flow reductions projects.
_
0
.N
Project Benefit
d
The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, improve fish passage and decrease creek bed scour during peak flow
a
events.
u_
U
a
Estimated ProjectU
*Includes prior year expenditures
(n
$100,000/year
L
Project Cost 2024 2025• •27 2028 2029• •
Design $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $140,000
a
Right of Way
v
N
0
Construction $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $1,260,000
N
Expense Total $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,400,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,400,000
E
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
w
Q
Unsecured Grants
+:
Funding Source Total $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $1,400,000
c
E
M
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 81 1 Packet Pg. 101
The purpose of this project is to improve the environmental health of the creek necessary to support fish habitat, and to
restore the storm water capacity. The project consists of the modifications to three structures that currently prevent fish
passage and are undersized for the flows on the creek, (1) the culvert at the BNSF track, remove and replace with a fish -
friendly culvert or bridge with adequate flow capacity, (2) return flow to the creek between the diversion structure and the
BNSF culvert by blocking the structure and restoring creek capacity and (3) culvert at Talbot Road, remove and replace witl-
fish-friendly culvert or bridge that provides adequate fish passage and storm water flow capacity. This project will increase
the resiliency of the watershed by building the structures that mimic the natural channel performance necessary for fish
habitat and stormwater flow capacity. The project also includes time and effort to research and apply for
supplemental/additional funding sources for construction. Due to the project complexity and number of stakeholders, the
planning and design phase is estimated to be 2-years.
The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and improve fish passage.
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
$7,636,000
Project Cost
Design
Right of
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$275,000 $1,305,000
$2,800,000 $3,000,000
$275,000 $4,105,000 $3,000,000
$161,000 $1,490,400 $750,000
$114,000
$2,614,600 $2,250,000
$275,000 $4,105,000 $3,000,000
c
0
.N
a
LL
U
a_
U
L
0
t2
3
a
N
O
N
C
m
E
s
0
ca
Q
w
c
a�
E
s
0
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 82 1 Packet Pg. 102
City of Edmonds and Lynnwood joint project to supplement/update the Perrinville Creek 2015 basin analysis that
determined possible locations for projects that would help decrease the peak storm flows during high rain events. Project
will be updated to reflect projects completed and also determine if there are other locations within the basin to aid in the
reduction of peak flows in the basin.
Improve overall basin and stream health, by using green stormwater infrastructure methods. This will make it so that rainf
is not simply collected and conveyed downstream and instead behaves as close as possible to natural conditions. This
includes infiltrating rainfall runoff as close as possible to where it fell. This will also decrease stream peak flows, which will
decrease stream erosion and improve the overall stream habitat for aquatic life.
$649,200
Design
$594,390
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
$594,390
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$141,000
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
$418,200
City of Lynnwood
$35,190
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$594,390
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 83 1 Packet Pg. 103
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
84 1 1 Packet Pg. 104
> Q\ S �a
`r o
co 240th St SW `1n'�
Mathay
Ballinger
Park W
240th PI SW = 241st St SW
79th P�
i-
�O
n
a a
00
242nd St SW
Lake Ballinger suffers from urban flooding & seasonal algae blooms along with other water quality impairments. The
Highway 99 corridor is an area of high development, including a future City project which will require stormwater
mitigation. By creating a regional facility, the City can improve the stormwater mitigation achieved by development,
addressed stormwater mitigation needs for the future Highway project, and treat runoff from one of the City bigger polluti
generating areas. The City can drastically improve Lake Ballinger water quality. The project proposes to implement water
quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Bal linger Park as green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) whic
would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhance a valued neighborhood, but underutilized,
park.
The project proposes to implement water quality and flow control improvements at City -owned Mathay-Ballinger Park as
green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) which would significantly benefit the Lake ecology and habitat conditions and enhan
a valued neighborhood, but underutilized, park.
$3,200,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$200,000 $200,000
$2,800,000
$200,000 $3,000,000
$200,000 $750,000
$2,250,000
$200,000 $3,000,000
c
0
N
a�
a
LL
U
a_
U
L
0
<.i
3
a
N
O
N
c
m
E
s
0
ca
Q
w
c
a�
E
s
0
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 85
Packet Pg. 105
The project purchases an existing single family residential property in 2023 located within the Lake Ballinger flood plain. Th
City secured a $500,000 Department of Ecology grant to aid in this process. The home is the lowest property on the lake w
is badly damaged from previous flooding to the point it is generally uninhabitable.
The City intends to remove the home and any pollution generating surfaces from the site in 2024 as part of the initial 2023 a
purchase. The grant has restrictions that prevent this parcel to be used for public use. After demolition of the structures an
impervious surfaces, the planned site use would be for public utility benefit only. Because the City storm drain line for SR-1 =
cuts through in an easement immediately adjacent to this parcel, the City plans to pursue a future project to split
°
appropriate flows from the City storm drain system and provide water quality treatment to the maximum extent feasible.
N
5
The future project would provide water quality treatment for a very heavily trafficked highway (SR-104) and would make
X
significant improvement in water quality to Lake Ballinger and its downstream course to Lake Washington via McAleer Cre(
a-
c�
Project Benefit
a
v
Improve the health and water quality of Lake Ballinger by removing hard surfaces and a home that is generally
L
uninhabitable. Project will also provide a future location to treat stormwater runoff from portions SR-104.
°
Estimated Project Cost
prior year expendituresa
$750,000
�
N
O
N
Project.st 2024 2025I 127 2028 20291 1
r
Design
Right of Way $10,000
t
Construction $110,000
r
Expense Total $120,000
r
Q
Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $92,500
m
Secured Grants $27,500
E
t
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total $120,000
w
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 86 1 Packet Pg. 106
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
87 1 1 Packet Pg. 107
Annual storm drain replacement/maintenance projects. Projects propose to replace or rehab storm drain infrastructure in
several locations throughout the City. Locations of work identified by City crews and staff via firsthand knowledge or video
inspection results. Much of Edmonds stormwater infrastructure is past its useful lifespan and requires routine replacement
or repair to preserve the function of the storm drain system. Failure to conduct annual maintenance projects will increase
chances of storm drain system failure.
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs
$1.7 to $2.4 million/year
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
Funding Source Total
$354,000 $337,000 $351,000 $365,000 $380,000 $395,000 $8,230,139
$1,347,000
$1,687,000
$1,755,000
$1,825,000
$1,898,000
$1,974,000
$41,129,861
$1,701,000
$2,024,000
$2,106,000
$2,190,000
$2,278,000
$2,369,000
$49,360,000
$1,701,000
$2,024,000
$2,106,000
$2,190,000
$2,278,000
$2,369,000
$49,360,000
$1,701,000
$2,024,000
$2,106,000
$2,190,000
$2,278,000
$2,369,000
$49,360,000
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 88 1 Packet Pg. 108
6.2.a
Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the
Annual Storm Maintenance Projects.
Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to the Annual Storm Replacement
Projects.
Estimated Project Cost
prior year expenditures
$315,000
Design
$25,000
Right of Way
Construction
$290,000
Expense Total
$315,000
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$315,000
ARPA Funds
Secured Grants
Unsecured Grants
Funding Source Total
$315,000
r
0
N
d
a
u_
0
a
v
Y
L
0
_v
a
N
O
N
_
d
E
t
0
r
r
Q
c
m
E
t
0
M
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 89 1 Packet Pg. 109
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 90
Packet Pg. 110
WOODWAv
nkt rv�
'. EDMONDS
4
ssswsrsw
u"Woavaut
cou"w
r = MOUNTLAKE
rtsn.u¢e 1ERRACE
�Y
...in.�x. OdG COIIN7Y 1MN13 W .....
The City of Edmonds (City) owns and operates an extensive system of drainage pipes, ditches, and other assets to convey
stormwater runoff into streams, lakes, and Puget Sound to prevent and minimize damage to private property, streets, and N
other infrastructure. The City is faced with the challenge of conveying this runoff safely and cost-effectively while preventir N
r
or minimizing the adverse impacts of high flows (erosion, flooding, and sediment deposition) and of stormwater pollutants c
on water quality and aquatic habitat. In addition, recent state and federal stormwater regulations make it technically and a
financially challenging to address these issues while balancing utility ratepayer costs. To proactively address these challeng
and remain in compliance with the State -mandated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Western Washington
Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Phase II permit) and other increasing regulatory requirements, the City is °
N
updating its current comprehensive storm and surface water management plan. This permit has and will continue to have � 5
significant impact on the workload and operational budget of both the Engineering Division and the Storm Crews within the L
Public Works Department. Per the State Department of Ecology, the plan will also include the work findings from their
required (stormwater Management Action Plan) SMAP process of City drainage watersheds. Project will also include �?
recommendations for stormwater utilities rates to be adjusted at the discretion of Council. a
U
Project Benefit
A holistic summary of the City's Stormwater system with recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance 0
and improvements projects. 3
a
Estimated Project Cost 04
0
priorp . N
$733,000
c
m
r r E
s
Design $350,000
Right of Way Q
Construction c
(D
Expense Total $350,000 E
s
Stormwater Utility Fund 422 $350,000
Funding Source Total $350,000 Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 91 1 Packet Pg. 111
i
W-W
Packet Pg. 112
6.2.a
SEWER
PWS-01 2024 SS Overlays
PWS-02 Phase 10 Annual Sewer Replacement (2023)
PWS-03 Phase 11 Annual Sewer Replacement (2024)
PWS-04
Phase 12 Annual Sewer Replacement (2025)
PWS-05
Phase 13 Annual Sewer Replacement (2026)
PWS-06
Phase 14 Annual Sewer Replacement (2027)
PWS-07
Phase 15 Annual Sewer Replacement (2028)
PWS-08
Phase 16 Annual Sewer Replacement (2029)
PWS-09
Phase 17 Annual Sewer Replacement (2030) &
Future Projects
PWS-10
Annual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabiliation
PWS-11
Lake Ballinger Sewer
PWS-13
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 4
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
Sewer Fund - 423
.-
0-0•
.!D
w
51
$60,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$60,000
$0
$60,0C
46
$10,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,000
$0
M
u-
$10,0C -
M
49
$2,005,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,005,000
$0
$2,005,0C
U
47
$363,498 $2,043,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,406,498
$0
$2,406,4� N
$0
$378,000 $2,125,000
$0
$0
$0
$2,503,000
$0
0
CN
$2,503,0C 4
N
O
$0
$0
$393,000
$2,210,000
$0
$0
$2,603,000
$0
$2,603,0C N
$0
$0
$0
$409,000
$2,299,000
$0
$2,708,000
$0
$2,708,0C 0
a_
$0
$0
$0
$0
$425,000
$2,391,000
$2,816,000
$0
$2,816,0C
r
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$442,000
$442,000
$58,991,000
$59,433,0C o
y
$0
$542,000
$565,000
$587,000
$611,000
$636,000
$2,941,000
$13,228,000
$16,169,0C
$0
$0
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
$0
$0
$7,000,000
$0
$7,000,0C CL
U
50 $522,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$522,000
$0
$522,0C a_
U
$2,960,498
$2,963,000
$4,083,000
$9,206,000
$3,335,000
$3,469,000
$26,016,498
$72,219,000
$98,235,4E y
Y
L
C
TOTAL
)24 2025
2026
2027 2028
2029
2030-44
TOT
(2024-2029)
$2,960,498 $2,963,000 $4,083,000 $9,206,000 $3,335,000 $3,469,000 $26,016,498 $72,219,000 $98,235,4� r
r
c
d
E
t
v
.r
.r
Q
c
aD
E
t
v
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 93 1 Packet Pg. 113
Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the
Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects.
Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to Sanitary Sewer Replacement
Projects.
$60,000
roject Cost i 2024
Design
$2,000
Right of Way
Construction
$58,000
Expense Total
$60,000
Sewer Fund 423
$60,000
Funding Source Total
$60,000
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 94 1 Packet Pg. 114
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace pipe and related appurtenances at various
locations throughout the City due to old age, being undersized, need to increase capacity, or more prone to breakage due t
its material properties.
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to r
day maintenance costs. _
0
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Funding Source Total
$378,000 $378,000 $393,000 $409,000 $425,000 $442,000
$2,000,000 $2,043,000 $2,125,000 $2,210,000 $2,299,000 $2,391,000
$2,378,000 $2,421,000 $2,518,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000
$2,378,000 $2,421,000 $2,518,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000
$2,378,000 $2,421,000 $2,518,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000
N
a�
IL
LL
ci
. v
$9,203,679 L
0
$49,787,321 2
$58,991,000 3
IL
$58,991,000 -e
N
$58,991,000 N
_
d
E
t
0
r
r
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 95 1 Packet Pg. 115
LPV
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line
existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this
trenchless method.
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to r
day maintenance costs. _
0
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
�I I I 1 .
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Funding Source Total
$81,000 $85,000 $88,000 $92,000
$461,000
$480,000
$499,000
$519,000
$542,000
$565,000
$587,000
$611,000
$542,000
$565,000
$587,000
$611,000
$542,000
$565,000
$587,000
$611,000
$96,000
$540,000
$636,000
$636,000
$636,000
N
a�
IL
LL
U
a
. v
$1,996,679 L
0
$11,231,321 v
$13,228,000 3
IL
$13,228,000 -e
N
$13,228,000 N
_
d
E
t
0
r
r
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 96 1 Packet Pg. 116
tbrtKANUL.
.d PISwLk-
Maple
234th`St SW—
3Q 2341h St SW Q
Q Madrona Ln
Z w m
7
N 236th St SW Q 236th St SW
2361h St SN' C
00
h St SW 238TH ST SW __
�t v
238th St sw _ a
3
� _'
0
Oth St SW 240th St
�
SW
79th�
a 242nd St SW 7 --
— a sy
—
242nd St SWa a
onian
a
CO
blk
244i-H ST SW
- �%S WAY I ea
Lake
Ballinger
232nd st Sw 232nd St SW
l
�232nd_ St_ i
m
f: N i
in
in y
-
;3 235thStSW.,LO
235TH PL.SWhW
236TH ST SW i
C'")l s
� C
,
f.�
s
t
c
LLINGER_WAY_ —2"TH-ST SW u
i
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the sewer pipe along Lak `c
Ballinger will require additional flow capacity in the near future. These improvements are needed to account for populatio `c
growth, reduce Infiltration and Inflow from the pipe and improve maintenance and emergency access for this major trunk cc
system.
7
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, and decrease overall day to day maintenance cost c
Improved access will help ease maintenance
and access for emergencies,
which will further decease any chance of potenti� 'FA
sewer spills into Lake Ballinger.
a
U-
Estimated Project
U
a_
$7,000,000
U
N
Y
Project•st
2024 20251
•27
2028 20291 1 O
Design
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Right of Way
3
Construction
$5,000,000
a
Expense Total
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
0
Sewer Fund 423
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
N
'
Funding Source Total
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
m
E
s
ca
Q
w
c
a�
E
s
ca
r
Q
CFP/CIP
Packet Pg. 117
2024 PW I December 2023
97
6.2.a
Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line
existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this
trenchless method.
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to r
Tay maintenance costs.
Estimated Project Cost
$522,000 a
LL
0
a
V
Design $70,000 L
Right of Way
Construction $452,000 2
Expense Total $522,000 3
a
Sewer Fund 423 $522,000
N
Funding Source Total $522,000 N
c
d
E
t
v
r
r
Q
c
m
E
t
�a
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 98 1 Packet Pg. 118
so . A(
LLJ
H I S r U K I C A L
-MUSEUM
I I
r, K
10
2024 PW CFP/CIP December 2023
99
6.2.a
FACILITIES
PWF-02
Cemetery Building
PWF-03
City Hall
PWF-04
Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station
PWF-05
Frances Anderson Center
PWF-06
Fire Station 16
PWF-07
Fire Station 17
PWF-08
Fire Station 20
PWF-09
Historic Log Cabin
PWF-10
Historical Museum
PWF-11
Library
Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing
PWF-23
Project
PWF-12
Meadowdale Club House
PWF-13
Old Public Works
PWF-14
Parks Maintenance Building
PWF-15
Public Safety
PWF-16
Public Works O&M
PWF-17
Wade James Theater
PWF-18
Yost Pool House
PWF-19
Fire Life Safety Communications
PWF-24 X
Landmark 99
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
7P ZU24 ZU25 ZU26 ZU27 ZU213 ZU29 (2024-2029) ZU3U-44 CO
63
$24,048
$8,414
$3,377
$818
$1,000
$0
$37,657
$0
$37,6! um
u_
63
$80,000
$279,064
$70,949
$108,628
$80,000
$0
$618,641
$0
$618,6, ;g
$2,971
$2,918
$5,628
$1,043
$1,500
$0
$14,060
$0
.Q
$14,01 L)
63
$110,000
$98,892
$1,000,000
$113,029
$80,000
$0
$1,401,921
$0
rn
$1,401,9: N
$49,280
$69,388
$30,107
$31,631
$35,000
$0
$215,406
$0
v
$215,41 0
N
$50,000
$221,922
$27,575
$122,245
$45,000
$0
$466,742
$0
$466,7, c
$36,274
$94,248
$69,782
$23,765
$20,000
$0
$244,069
$0
$244,01 Q
$30,000
$546
$1,361
$6,469
$1,500
$0
$39,876
$0
r
$39,8' c
63
$65,000
$10,000
$4,621
$10,199
$5,000
$0
$94,820
$0
y
$94,8: '>
d
63
$100,000
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
$0
$0
$233,363
$0
$233,31 a
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,900,000
$0
$4,900,000
$0
LL
$4,900,01 a
$97,091
$7,985
$4,446
$1,159
$5,000
$0
$115,681
$0
$115,61 y
$132,051
$25,000
$25,000
$24,519
$25,000
$0
$231,570
$0
L
$231,5' 0
2
63
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
$0
$144,074
$0
$144,0'
a
63
$220,000
$55,169
$151,481
$515,071
$80,000
$0
$1,021,721
$0
$1,021,7: ,*
N
O
63
$180,000
$80,315
$79,348
$43,821
$50,000
$0
$433,484
$0
$433,41 N
$99,077
$43,880
$115,734
$21,872
$25,000
$0
$305,563
$0
r
$305,51 c
d
E
$26,128
$8,409
$19,127
$30,389
$30,000
$0
$114,053
$0
$114,0!
$125,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$125,000
$0
.r
$125,01 Q
$290,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$290,000
$0
$290,01
E
$1,757,240 $1,068,824 $1,658,751 $1,158,886 $5,404,000 $0 $11,047,701 $0 $11,047,71
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
100 1 Packet Pg. 120
FACILITIES
6.2.a
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$605,000
$452,796
$470,917
$0
$0
Fund 016(non-bond proceeds)
$0
$591,028
$276,729
$76,592
$31,500
General Fund
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Water Utility Fund 421
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Sewer Utility Fund 423
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Unsecured Funding
$862,240
$25,000
$911,105
$1,082,294
$5,372,500
TOTAL REVENUE
$1,757,240
$1,068,824
$1,658,751
$1,158,886
$5,404,000
$0 $1,528,713
$0 $975,849
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,253,139
$0 $11,047,701
w
$0
$1,528,7'
U_
$0
$975,8, coo
$0
.Q
U
$0
rn
c
N
$0
c
N
$0
a
$0
0
$8,253,1: Q
$0 $11,047,71
0
.y
d
lY
a
LL
U
a_
U
Y
L
0
:.:
a
N
O
N
C
d
t
V
R
r.+
r
Q
C
N
t
V
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 101
Packet Pg. 121
This small structure houses the Edmonds Cemetery funerary services and the cemetery Sextant office. The building is in
relatively good condition and has little deferred maintenance backlog. Minor security and communications updates will be
needed as technology dictates.
Projects:
Q
Minor repair and maintenance
Project Benefit
c
C
N
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well -maintained facility creates a safe work environmei
rY
a
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
v
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
a
lifespan.Estim
v
• •ProjectCost
Includes
L
C
prior year expenditures
$24,048 (2024)
3
a
-
'e
N
Construction\Professional Services $24,048 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000
O
N
Expense Total $24,048 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $20,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $8,414
Unsecured Funding $4,048 $3,377 $818 $1,000
Funding Source Total $24,048 $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000
Q
w
c
W
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 102 1 Packet Pg. 122
1
ylil U f1�; (r..1�1I1 i'f�..f
City Hall was built in 1979 and was operated as a private business office center until the City purchased and renovated the
building in the 199Os. The City has operated Edmonds City Hall from this location since the renovations were completed. Th
building is in near original condition and needs substantial repair and maintenance.
Projects: All Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing systems need replacement, Restroom remodels w/gender neutral
Q
consideration, Center Stairway Code updates and replacement, Lobby remodel, Entry Awning re -glazing, Interior Painting,
ADA accessibility improvements.
0
V)
a)
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the 2�
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well -maintained facility creates a safe work environmei u-
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance a
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected v
lifespan. L
0
Estimated Project Cost
c,
inauoes prior year expenaicures
$80,000 1 '
roiect Cost 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030-44
Construction\Professional Services
$80,000
$279,064
$70,949
$108,628
$80,000
r
Expense Total
$80,000
$279,064
$70,949
$108,628
$80,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$80,000
$129,064
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$150,000
ca
Unsecured Funding
$70,949
$108,628
$80,000
Q
w
Funding Source Total
$80,000
$279,064
$70,949
$108,628
$80,000
W
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 103 1 Packet Pg. 123
The Pier was recently renovated and is generally in good condition. The Beach Ranger Office is a 1200 square foot office an
restroom facility located near the east end of the pier. There are season programs and visitor support functions that operas
out of this facility.
Projects: Electrical panel clean up and safety inspection, minor repairs, and maintenance, Beach Ranger Station/restroom
Q
roof replacement.
Project Benefit
c
C
N
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
a
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
u_
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
a
lifespan.
v
Estimated ProjectCost
Includes
L
C
prior year expenditures
$2,971 (2024)
3
a
-
'e
N
Construction\Professional Services $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500
O
N
Expense Total $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $2,918
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
s
Unsecured Funding $2,971 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500
Funding Source Total $2,971 $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500
Q
w
c
a�
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 104 1 Packet Pg. 124
The Frances Anderson Center serves as the City's main recreation center offering arts, athletic and cultural programing yea
round. Due to the age and high usage of the building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or
restoration.
Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilers with Electric alternatives that will add ventilation, cooling and heating Investment a
grade audit approved by City Council, Replacement of all exterior doors scheduled for 2024, ADA accessible door closures,
Plumbing drainage collector, Restroom remodels (w/ gender neutral consideration), Replacement of all plumbing fixtures,
Addition of building security card readers, Building HVAC controls to maximize efficiency, Fire Sprinkler replacement, and 2
clean building act compliance efforts will be addresses by IGA.)
•
a
u_
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
U
a
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
U
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
L
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
0
lifespan.
Project Cost
a
prior year p .
N
$110,000 (2024)
O
N
c
Construction\Professional Services $110,000 $98,892 $1,000,000 $113,029 $80,000
m
E
s
Expense Total $110,000 $98,892 $1,000,000 $113,029 $80,000
M
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $110,000 $98,892 $470,917
Q
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
w
_
W
Unsecured Funding $529,083 $113,029 $80,000
E
s
Funding Source Total $110,000 $98,892 $1,000,000 $113,029 $80,000
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 105 1 Packet Pg. 125
This facility is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue and was built in 2003 and has a building area of 10,70(
square feet. The building is in fair condition and will require some infrastructure updates or replacements to remain
operationally ready for the needs of the City.
Projects: Roll -up Bay door controller replacements, HVAC unit assessment, Gutter replacement, interior coatings updates
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.
$49,280 (2024)
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$49,280 $69,388
$49,280 $69,388
$69,388
$49,280
$49,280 $69,388
$30,107 $31,631 $35,000
$30,107 $31,631 $35,000
$30,107 $31,631 $35,000
$30,107 $31,631 $35,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 106 1 Packet Pg. 126
MIM,M
MML-M:
MMM
MMM
This building is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue, was built in 1999 and has a building area of 9,800
square feet. This building has had some updates but will need some infrastructure upgrades to remain operationally ready
Projects: Bay Door assessment, Electrical infrastructure updates, roof soffit enclosure, interior painting.
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.
$50,000 (2024)
Construction\Professional Services
$50,000
$221,922
$27,575
$122,245
$45,000
Expense Total
$50,000
$221,922
$27,575
$122,245
$45,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$221,922
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
$50,000
$27,575
$122,245
$45,000
Funding Source Total
$50,000
$221,922
$27,575
$122,245
$45,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 107 1 Packet Pg. 127
PVC
6 J
This building is the eldest of the City's three fire stations and is operated by South County Fire and Rescue. This station sery
Esperance and supports the other two fire stations in Edmonds. The building is 6400 square feet and was built in 1990. Th(
building has had significant updates to the exterior envelope and is in need of interior and HVAC system updates.
Projects: interior painting, restroom fixture replacement
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.
$36,274 (2024)
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$36,274 $94,248
$36,274 $94,248
$94,248
$36,274
$36,274 $94,248
$69,782
$23,765
$20,000
$69,782
$23,765
$20,000
$69,782
$23,765
$20,000
$69,782
$23,765
$20,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 108 1 Packet Pg. 128
EMEMMI
PVC
J
This Historic log cabin is home to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce visitor center, the structure was a purpose built cabi
from the turn of the century. The structure is professionally maintained on a three year cycle by a log cabin specialist and
requires only minor maintenance and upkeep annually.
Projects: new thick cut shingle replacement, chinking of exterior log finish, interior lighting.
Project Benefit
c
0
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a_,
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected v
lifespan.Estimated Project Cost
a
v
L
*Includes•- 0
$30,000 (2024) 2
M
Project Cost 2024 2025I I27 2028 20291 1 7
a
Construction\Professional Services $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 c
Expense Total $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 N
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $30,000
c
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 E
Unsecured Funding M
ca
Funding Source Total $30,000 $546 $1,361 $6,469 $1,500 Q
w
c
a�
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP 1 December 2023 109 1 Packet Pg. 129
The 110-year-old original Carnegie Library building is home to the Edmonds Museum. The building is on the State of
Washington Historic registry and has been well maintained over the last several years. Buildings of this age require
specialized maintenance and coordination with the state historic architect to maintain the historic status. Structural
stabilization, weatherproofing, and updating the restroom to meet ADA compliance are the most significant priorities to
maintain this facility.
Projects: minor structural reinforcement, entry fagade masonry repair, lower entry restoration
0
Project Benefit
.y
N
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
IL
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer u-
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance a
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected t�
lifespan. L
0
Estimated Project Cost
$45,000 (2024) a
N
C
Project Cost
1
•
1
1
•
• • N
Construction\Professional Services
$65,000
$10,000
$4,621
$10,199
$5,000
r
Z
Expense Total
$65,000
$10,000
$4,621
$10,199
$5,000
a=i
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$65,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$10,000
$4,621
$10,199
$5,000
r
Unsecured Funding
Q
Funding Source Total
$65,000
$10,000
$4,621
$10,199
$5,000
y
E
s
t�
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 110 1 Packet Pg. 130
- Facilit
Public
Works
Library
The Edmonds Library is operated by the Sno-Isle Library system with exception of the Second floor Plaza room rental space
The library is a 19,000 square foot building built in 1982. The building hosts special event rentals and daily Library
programming and community services. This is one of the City's most heavily used buildings by the public and has significant
deferred maintenance needs, including the building fagade and plaza deck waterproofing.
Projects: window replacement, ADA access device upgrades or replacement, gender inclusive public restroom creation, Pla —
Room restroom/changing facilities, Plaza Room A/V installation, building masonry restoration or building cladding, exterior
stairway restoration, HVAC ventilation fan assessment, building breezeway remodel, flood damage restoration, and plaza .°
level green roof now on CIP.
a
u_
U
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the a
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer U
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance L
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected 0
lifespan.
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
$100,000 (2024) N
Construction\Professional Services
$100,000
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
Expense Total
$100,000
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$100,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$100,000
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 ill I Packet Pg. 131
MMM
This 4000 square foot facility was built in 1965 as a community theater facility and later was transformed into the
Meadowdale community club house. The building is currently owned and maintained by the City of Edmonds and houses tl
City operated Meadowdale pre-school and the 1500 square foot Meadowdale club house rental facility. This facility while
dated has been well maintained and only requires minor maintenance and repairs.
Projects: minor maintenance and repairs, interior flooring and painting, and bath fixture replacement.
Project Benefit
c
C
N
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
a
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
v
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
a
lifespan.
v
Estimated ProjectCost
Includes
L
C
prior year expenditures
$97,091 (2024)
3
a
N
Construction\Professional Services $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000
O
N
Expense Total $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
c
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000
M
Unsecured Funding $97,091
Funding Source Total $97,091 $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000
Q
w
c
W
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 112 1 Packet Pg. 132
This facility was built in 1965 to house the City's Public Works Department, the building was converted in 1995 to tenant
space and City storage, as well as Edmonds Police large evidence storage. This is a vital piece of property adjacent to the
Waste Water Treatment Plant, and could be converted for utility use if regulatory requirements dictate. Building is primaril
used as storage and will need some updates to maintain current operational readiness.
Projects: HVAC updates, roll -up door replacement, security camera system.
Project Benefit
c
C
N
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
a
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
v
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
a
lifespan.Estim
v
• •ProjectCost
Includes
L
C
prior year expenditures
$132,051 (2024)
3
a
-
'e
N
Construction\Professional Services $132,051 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000
O
N
Expense Total $132,051 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
c
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
s
Unsecured Funding $132,051 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000
Funding Source Total $132,051 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000
Q
w
c
M
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 113 1 Packet Pg. 133
6.2.a
This facility was built in 1967 by Ed Huntley who at the time was the City Facilities supervisor. The 4800 square foot facility
now houses all City Facility Operations staff(11) and all of Park and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+ seasonal help) This
Facility is home to the City Carpentry Shop, Key Shop, City Flower program, Parks engine repair shop and Parks and Facilitie
maintenance supply storage as well as Parks and Facilities Manager offices. This Facility is near end of life and is undersized
to support the departmental staffing that are assigned to this facility.
Projects: maintenance and repair to maintain operational capacity, ADA restroom updates, shop floor replacement, Pine St =
facility exit, exterior painting. °
N
Proiect Be-fefit
d
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
v
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
a
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
t�
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
L
lifespan.
°
Estimated Project Cost
prior year expendituresa
$40,320 (2024)
N
0
N
Project Cost 2024 20251 127 2028 20291 1
r
Construction\Professional Services $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000
Z
=
d
Expense Total $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000
t
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $25,000
v
r
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $9,349
r
Q
Unsecured Funding $15,320 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000
m
Funding Source Total $40,320 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000
t
ra
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 114 1 Packet Pg. 134
The Public Safety building houses Edmonds Police Department, Edmonds Municipal Court and the City Council Chambers.
The building was built in 1999 encompassing 30,000 square feet of office, court and municipal government uses. The buildi
houses one of the City emergency operations centers, large police training, simulator facilities and evidence processing anc
storage. The building has had minimal system updates over it's life and has a significant amount of deferred maintenance
and should be retrofitted with new fire sprinklers.
Projects: air handler and outdoor ventilation unit replacements, new solar plant installation, parking lot reconfiguration to
meet current usage, fire sprinkler installation, interior hallway renovation and painting, sleeping room remodel and gender
specific/neutral accommodations, gender inclusive public restrooms, operable windows is specific locations, courts flat roo
replacement.
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
lifespan.
$220,000 (2024)
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$220,000
$55,169
$151,481
$220,000
$55,169
$151,481
$140,000
$55,169
$151,481
$80,000
$220,000
$55,169
$151,481
$515,071 $80,000
$515,071 $80,000
$515,071 $80,000
$515,071 $80,000
c
0
N
a
u_
U
a_
U
Y
L
C
a
N
O
N
c
m
E
s
0
ca
Q
w
c
0
E
s
V
cc
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 115 1 Packet Pg. 135
E
This building built in 1995 houses four Public Works divisions and the auxiliary City Emergency Operations Center. This
building is 28,000 square feet and is capable of operations 24/7 during weather emergencies and natural disasters. The
building has significant deferred maintenance needs and infrastructure updates.
Projects: vehicle yard leveling, HVAC unit replacements, roof system for material bunkers, ventilation fan replacements, firs a
alarm system replacement, lobby remodel, restroom remodel with gender inclusivity considerations, electric vehicle
charging and maintenance infrastructure, emergency communications updates, interior hallway flooring thresholds, utility
bay HVAC replacement, water main replacement (building connection). °
N
Be-refitProiect
a�
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the v
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer a
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance v
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected L
lifespan. o
CSTlmaiea rrolecT LosT
*Includes prior year expenditures
$285,000(2024)
Construction\Professional Services $180,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000
m
Expense Total $180,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 s
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $35,000
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $80,315 Q
w
General Fund =
a�
Water Fund 421 E
s
Stormwater Fund 422
r
Sewer Fund 423 Q
Unsecured Funding $145,000 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000
Funding Source Total $180,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 Packet Pg. 136
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 116
This community theater was built by the Driftwood Players theater group in 1967 and was deeded to City ownership at a
later date. The facility is 6,300 square feet in size and houses the Driftwood Players theatrical performances and City
meetings. The City's maintenance responsibilities are limited to large infrastructure, parking lot, roofing, and grounds.
Projects: parking lot repair and recoating, minor repair, and maintenance.
Project Benefit
o
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
N
'>
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
W
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
M
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
�?
lifespan.
a
v
EstimatedProjectCost
*Includes prior year expenditures
L
$99,077 (2024)
2
3
Project--
a
Construction\Professional Services $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000
N
c
N
Expense Total $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds) $43,880
E
Unsecured Funding $99,077 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000
Funding Source Total $99,077 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000
Q
w
c
W
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 117 1 Packet Pg. 137
This recreational facility houses the City's aquatic programing and some Parks and Recreation programs. Built in 1971 the
pool house historically was only operated seasonally. The tenant run aquatic programing is currently expanding to year
round lap and team aquatic activities and will continue to support summer open swim programing. The facility requires
minimal maintenance to remain operational and is subject to tenant lease terms of use.
Projects: security updates, roof replacement, gutter replacement, plumbing fixture updates, exterior door replacements,
operational repair and maintenance to accommodate 365 operations.
0
V)
a)
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the W
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer v
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance a
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected v
lifespan. L
0
Estimated Project Cost
c,
inauoes prior year expenaicures
1 '
roiect Cost 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030-44
Construction\Professional Services
$26,128
$8,409
$19,127
$30,389
$30,000
Expense Total
$26,128
$8,409
$19,127
$30,389
$30,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
M
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
$8,409
ca
Unsecured Funding
$26,128
$19,127
$30,389
$30,000
Q
w
Funding Source Total
$26,128
$8,409
$19,127
$30,389
$30,000
W
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 118 1 Packet Pg. 138
s
,y
All fire and life safety systems are required to be monitored 24/7 in case of emergency. Previously this monitoring has beer
done by traditional phone lines (POTS). This infrastructure is aging in place and is not required to be maintained by the
telecommunications providers as of 2020. In 2022 we have had 3 catastrophic communications failures that resulted sever;
thousand dollars expense and lack of compliance with fire code. The City has eleven facilities with life safety monitoring, ar
six locations with elevators, making a total of 17 locations with monitoring requirements that will need to be updated.
Maintaining and updating aging infrastructure allows the City to continue to operate older buildings by staying compliant
with fire code and L&I regulations.
$125,000
Construction\Professional Services $125,000
Expense Total $125,000
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
Unsecured Funding $125,000
Funding Source Total $125,000
c
0
.N
a�
a
u_
U
a_
U
0
Y
L
0
3
a
N
0
N
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 119 1 Packet Pg. 139
The Library Plaza Deck is essentially a green roof on the second floor of the Edmonds Sno-Isle Library. The deck surface was
waterproofed and remodeled in 2003, since that project continuous water intrusion has occurred through the waterproof
membrane. This water intrusion has been successfully mitigated over the years and has not been deemed a project of
significance previously. In 2018 Western Specialty Contractors inspected the water intrusion and offered an initial ROM
price to demolish and waterproof the existing plaza deck. Rebuilding the plaza deck and replacement of landscape, planter!
grass, pavement, flashing and hand railings would be a separate construction project. The Parks Director in 2018 offered ar
estimate to replace landscaping and irrigations systems. In 2021 a draft structural report was performed by MLA Engineenr
to discover any structural consequences from the years of water intrusion, building was deemed structurally sound and
water intrusion not factoring in to building structural stability.
Maintaining building in operational and safe condition, in order to maintain partnership with Sno-Isle Library system.
Preservation of the City's physical assets in appropriate condition vs. the age of the facility and historic capital investment
$4,900,000
Construction\Professional Services
Expense Total
Fund 001 (Repair & Maint, Prof
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
Unsecured Funding
Funding Source Total
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
$4,900,000
E
�a
L
0
L
a
c
0
N
a�
a
LL
U
a_
U
Y
L
0
2
3
a
N
O
N
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 120 1 Packet Pg. 140
Site Plan Options
The Town Square The Village Green The Neighborhood
Total BUA 1.23 Million SF
Civic space 90,500 SF (7.35%)
Public Open Space 2 Acres
a ,
All
Total BUA 1.09 Million SF Total BUA 1.09 Million SF
Civic space 70,500 SF (6.4%) Civic space 70,500 SF (6.4%)
Public Open Space 1.8 Acres Public Open Space 1.8 Acres
�. 01 O •�I
! as Ov r
\� 7 f
fy v
L®L°I
Community Uses Retail Uses Open Space
Site acquisition and development through public -private partnership. Costs for 2023 were approximately $240,000, which N
includes $100,000 to secure the option to purchase. Costs for 2024 will include due diligence, development agreement N
CD
consultation, real estate consulting, and project communications. These costs — approximately $290,000 - will be split N
between a grant from Snohomish County ($75,000) and the Affordable and Supportive Housing Sales and Use Tax Credit c
(approximately $300,000 available in 2024). All expenses and funding beyond 2024 will be determined pending research a
provided in 2024. .,
c
This project is managed by Economic Development and Planning and Development Services jointly. °
N
Proiect Be-fefit
a�
This project is a public -private partnership focused on community -oriented design at the Burlington Coat Factory site. The u-
city's portion of funds will go toward public benefits, such as open/park space, recreation areas or facilities, a police annex, a
and community center. v
L
Estimated Project Cost 0
*Includes prior year expenditures JA
2
2023 $240,000 2024 $290,000 3
a
- 'e
N
O
Design $290,000 N
Expense Total $290,000
c
Grants & Taxes $290,000 m
E
Funding Source Total $290,000
ca
Q
w
c
W
E
s
ca
r
21
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 121 1 Packet Pg. 141
Q
Packet Pg. 142
low —I
6.2.a
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
-.
0- ••
,.
PWP-01
WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In House
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,250,000
$1,250,000
$5,000,000
$18,750,000
$23,750,00
Projects
PWP-02
Carbon Recovery Project
56
$500,000
$500,000
$500,00 LL
R
.r
PWP-04
Nutrient Removal Project
59
$350,000
$750,000
$750,000
$20,000,000
$20,000,000
$41,850,000
$41,850,00 Q-
U
PWP-08
Gasification Bypass (Class A Solids Production)
55
$300,000
$300,000
$300,00 N
PWP-09
WWTP Asset Criticality Ranking and Condition
57
$150,000
$150,000
$150,00 N
Assessment
PWP-10
VFD Upgrades
58
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
$750,000
N
$750,00 N
PWP-11
Primary Clarifier 2 Rehab
54
$600,000
$600,000
$600,00 O
M
PWP-12
Primary Clarifier 3 Rehab
$950,000
$950,000
$950,00 Q
r
PWP-13
ODS (Primary Sludge) Pump Replacement
$350,000
$250,000
$600,000
$600,00 C
PWP-14
Chlorine Contact Channel Sluice Gates
$375,000
$375,000
$375,00 y
Replacement
>
d
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
$2,650,000
$2,450,000
$1,8509000
$21,250,000
$21,6259000
$1,250,000
$51,075,000
$18,750,000
$69,825,00
a
U_
U
a_
U
TOTALY
SOURCEFUNDING
124
2025
20261
128
20291
1 29)
1 1
•
C
$1,345,935
$1,244,355
$939,615
$10,792,875
$10,983,338
$634,875
$25,940,993
$9,523,125
$35,464,11 c�
Edmonds (Sewer Fund 423) - 50.79%
$614,005
$567,665
$428,645
$4,923,625
$5,010,513
$289,625
$11,834,078
$4,344,375
.0
$16,178,45 =
Mountlake Terrace - 23.17%
$438,575
$405,475
$306,175
$3,516,875
$3,578,937
$206,875
$8,452,912
$3,103,125
d
$11,556,03 N
Olympic View Water Sewer District - 16.55%
$251,485
$232,505
$175,565
$2,016,625
$2,052,212
$118,625
$4,847,017
$1,779,375
c
$6,626,39 N
TOTAL REVENUE"° $2,650,000
$2,450,000
$1,850,000
$21,250,000
$21,625,000
$1,250,000
$51,075,000
$18,750,000
$69,825,00 Y
c
d
E
t
v
R
.r
.r
Q
C
N
t
c�
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 123 1 Packet Pg. 143
The WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In -House Projects is intended to maintain infrastructure and equipment to ensure
that the treatment plant is well maintained.
This project ensures that critical infrastructure is maintained and equipment is replaced in order to reduce risk to the City
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
11 111 1
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $250,000 $250,000
$400,000
$400,000
$400,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,250,000
$1,250,000
$253,950
$253,950
$253,950
$507,900
$634,875
$634,875
$115,850
$115,850
$115,850
$231,700
$289,625
$289,625
$82,750
$82,750
$82,750
$165,500
$206,875
$206,875
$47,450
$47,450
$47,450
$94,900
$118,625
$118,625
$500,000
$500,000
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,250,000
$1,250,000
X
1 1 CLL
$3,750,000 a
V
rn
$15,000,OOC L
0
$18,750,000 3:
$9,523,125
$4,344,375 a
$3,103,125 N
CD
$1,779,375 N
$18,750,000 r
c
d
E
t
�a
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 124 1 Packet Pg. 144
To cover any carryover or close-out costs associated with the Carbon Recovery Project that occur in FY 2024.
To complete and close out all items associated with the Carbon Recovery Project.
$500,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
$500,000
Expense Total
$500,000
Sewer Fund 423
$253,950
Mountlake Terrace
$115,850
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$82,750
City of Shoreline
$47,450
Funding Source Total
$500,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 125 1 Packet Pg. 145
6.2.a
The WA Dept of Ecology has imposed the Puget Sound Nutrient General Permit upon us. It is anticipated that our current
process will not be able to meet these new permit requirements. This decision package will allow us to team with an
engineering firm to study our current process and design a solution that will allow our plant to meet the new PSNGP
requirements as well as accommodate projected service area growth over the next decade.
To meet new permit requirements and increase capacity for projected 20-year service area expansion.
Estimated Project Cost
*Includes prior year expenditures
� 1 111
Project Cos
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
$350,000 $750,000 $750,000
$20,000,000 $20,000,000
$350,000 $750,000 $750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000
$177,765
$380,925
$380,925 $10,158,000 $10,158,000
$81,095
$173,775
$173,775 $4,634,000 $4,634,000
$57,925
$124,125
$124,125 $3,310,000 $3,310,000
$33,215
$71,175
$71,175 $1,898,000 $1,898,000
$350,000
$750,000
$750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 126 1 Packet Pg. 146
This allows the ability to continue production of class A solids if/when the gasification system is shut down for repairs or
preventative maintenance. The ability to produce and haul class A solids will eliminate a temporary but substantial cost
increase hauling as this product is essentially the same in volume as biochar or concentrated minerals and is accepted at th
local transfer station whereas if this option is not available, sludge will need to be loaded into trailers and hauled to Oregor
as was done during the Carbon Recovery Project at a cost of up to $200,000 per month. This redundant solids processing
mode was an option to add to the Carbon Recovery Project and was rejected by previous administration. Along with the
savings in hauling costs, there will be no additional odor issues or daily sludge truck traffic in the adjacent neighborhood.
Allow solids handling system redundancy and the ability to run the dryer unit independently in the event of a gasification
system failure or repair. The dryer is capable of producing Class A biosolids, which would negate the need for temporary
hauling and disposal of wet cake at a rate of up to $200,000/month.
$300,000
Design
$50,000
Right of Way
Construction
$250,000
Expense Total
$300,000
Sewer Fund 423
$152,370
Mountlake Terrace
$69,510
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$49,650
City of Shoreline
$28,470
Funding Source Total
$300,000
c
0
N
a�
a
u_
U
a_
U
L
0
3
a
N
O
N
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 127 1 Packet Pg. 147
Work with engineering firm to develop a comprehensive asset management system which includes an asset condition
assessment as well as asset criticality ranking. This will allow the WWTP to develop a 5 and 10 year asset repair and
replacement and CIP schedule which will improve overall plant reliability.
Develop a short and long term plan to improve plant reliability by ranking critical assets and creating a capital improvemen r
plan. As the majority of this facility is coming to the end of its useful life, the planned replacement/repair of failing =
0
equipment and structures will be much more cost effective than replacing upon failure and ensure that the plant maintains 'v_,
its ability to meet discharge permit requirements. This will also be valuable in future rate studies.
EstimatedProject•
a
LL
expenditures
0
prior
a_
$150,000
v
v7
Y
Project•st
2024 20251
127 2028 20291 1 C
Design
$150,000
Right of Way
Construction
a
Expense Total
$150,000
0
Sewer Fund 423
$76,185
N
'
r
Mountlake Terrace
$34,755
=
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$24,825
d
E
City of Shoreline
$14,235
t
Funding Source Total
$150,000
r
Q
c
m
E
t
�a
w
Q
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 128 1 Packet Pg. 148
The WWTP has several VFD's (variable frequency drives) on various critical equipment influent pumps, effluent pumps,
RAS/WAS pumps, aeration blowers, etc. These VFD's have an expected useful life of 15-20 years. Several of the VFD's here N
at the plant range in age between 20-30 years old. There have already bees some failures and replacements made. These N
r
outdated VFD's need to be replaced to avoid a catastrophic failure event that could happen to these weakened state VFD's c
for any number of reasons, including abrupt starting and stopping due to power bumps/loss, switching from grid to
Q
generator power supply or just a parts failure. If multiple critical components fail simultaneously, then the plant may lose it
ability to treat wastewater that meets NPDES permit requirements resulting in pollution of our receiving waters and possib
fines by our governing agency. °
N
a)
Be-refitProiect W
To keep critical equipment reliable and in working condition.
0.
v
a
Estimated Project Cost
U
prior year expendituresw
$250,000
L
°
2
Design
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
3
a
Right of Way
N
0
Construction
$200,000
$200,000
$200,000
N
Expense Total
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
Sewer Fund 423
$126,975
$126,975
$126,975
c
Mountlake Terrace
$57,925
$57,925
$57,925
0
View Water Sewer District
$41,375
$41,375
$41,375
2Olympic
Q
City of Shoreline
$23,725
$23,725
$23,725
Funding Source Total
$250,000
$250,000
$250,000
c
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 129 1 Packet Pg. 149
Primary Clarifier #2 cage, center column, feedwell, corner sweeps, weir, counterweight, skimming device and rake arms ne
replacement due to severe corrosion. The steel has not been replaced since the original construction. The limited access wi
require that pieces be assembled inside the tank. The concrete structure also needs to be inspected and repaired as neede
as corrosion of the concrete in spots has led to exposed rebar and may have compromised the structural integrity of the
clarifier.
Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is in a state of imminent failure. Ensure WWTP's ability to treat wastewate
up to its rated capacity and meet discharge permit requirements.
Design
$100,000
Right of Way
Construction
$500,000
Expense Total
$600,000
Sewer Fund 423
$304,740
Mountlake Terrace
$139,020
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$99,300
City of Shoreline
$56,940
Funding Source Total
$600,000
c
0
.N
a�
a
LL
U
a_
U
0
Y
L
0
3
a
N
0
N
c
m
E
s
ca
Q
w
c
a�
E
s
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 130 1 Packet Pg. 150
Primary Clarifier #3 (dual drive) cages, center columns, feedwells, corner sweeps, weirs, counterweights, skimming devices
and rake arms need replacement due to severe corrosion. The steel is in a highly corrosive environment and has not been
replaced since the original construction approximately 30 years ago. The limited access will require that pieces be assembl(
inside the tank. The concrete structure also needs to be inspected and repaired as needed as corrosion of the concrete in
spots has led to exposed rebar and may have compromised the structural integrity of the clarifier.
Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is approaching a state of imminent failure. Ensure WWTP's ability to treat
wastewater up to its rated capacity and meet discharge permit requirements.
$950,000
Design
$150,000
Right of Way
Construction
$800,000
Expense Total
$950,000
Sewer Fund 423
$482,505
Mountlake Terrace
$220,115
Olympic View Water Sewer District
$157,225
City of Shoreline
$90,155
Funding Source Total
$950,000
c
O
.N
a�
a
LL
U
a_
U
N
Y
O
3
a
N
0
N
c
m
E
s
0
ca
Q
w
c
aD
E
s
V
ca
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 131 1 Packet Pg. 151
Public Works - Treatment Plant P
ODS (Primary Sludge) Pump Replacement
The ODS pumps are over 30 years old and are at the end of their useful life. The maintenance, reliability and efficiency of t
primary sludge pumping system would be greatly improved by replacing the current diaphragm pumps with progressive
cavity pumps. During this pump replacement, piping modifications would also be done to allow pumps to support more th
one clarifier, improving system redundancy along with reliability.
Improve reliability, redundancy and efficiency of the primary sludge and scum pumps by replacing 30+ year old pumps and
improving piping system.
$600,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
$100, 000
$250,000 $250,000
$350,000 $250,000
$177,765
$126,975
$81,095
$57,925
$57,925
$41,375
$33,215
$23,725
$350,000 $250,000
2024 PW CFPICIP I December 2023 132 1 Packet Pg. 152
Replace two gate valves and actuators at the inlets of the two chlorine contact channels. These gates have repeatedly
failed. Repair is often expensive and time consuming, as access is an issue, so it is necessary to rent scaffolding and other
equipment to make repairs. When a gate fails, it effectively cuts the disinfection capacity of the plant in half. These are
critical pieces of equipment and need to be replaced with a different technology to improve performance and reliability.
To replace problematic, yet critical valves with more reliable technology that helps to ensure disinfection system
functionality and the ability to continue to meet NPDES discharge permit requirements.
$375,000
Design
Right of Way
Construction
Expense Total
Sewer Fund 423
Mountlake Terrace
Olympic View Water Sewer District
City of Shoreline
Funding Source Total
$75,000
$300,000
$375,000
$190,463
$86,888
$62,062
$35,587
$375,000
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 133
Packet Pg. 153
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
134
6.2.a
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2023 TO 2024)
PROJECTS ADDED
Transportation
PROJECTType
2024 Traffic Signal and Safety Upgrades
•
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Transportation
2024 Pedestrian Safety Program
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Transportation
88th Ave. Overlay and Sidewalk Repair
Estimated future costs for transportation project.
Water
2024 Waterline Overlays
Estimated future costs for road repairs due to waterline replacements.
Water
Phase 20 Annual Replacement Program (2030)
Estimated future costs for waterline replacements.
Storm
2024 Stormwater Overlays
Estimated future costs for road repairs due to storm replacements
Storm
Phase 10 Annual Storm Replacement (2030)
Estimated future costs for stormline replacements
Sewer
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 4
Estimated future costs for sewer project.
Sewer
2024 Sanitary Sewer Overlays
Estimated future costs for road repairs due to sewer line replacements.
Sewer
Phase 17 Annual Sewer Replacement/Rehab (2030)
Estimated future costs for sewerline replacements
Facilities
Landmark 99
New project added December 2023
WWTP
Gasification Bypass (Class A Solids Production)
Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project.
WWTP
WWTP Asset Criticality Ranking and Condition Assessment
Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project.
WWTP
VFD Upgrades
Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project.
WWTP
Primary Clarifier 2 Rehab
Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project.
WWTP
Primary Clarifier 3 Rehab
Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project.
WWTP
ODS Primary Sudge Pump Replacement
Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project.
WWTP
Chlorine Contact Channel Sluice Gates Replacement
Estimated future costs for waste water treatment plant project.
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2023 TO 2024)
PROJECTS REMOVED
Type
Transportation
PROJECT NAME
2023 Guardrail Program
DESCRIPTION
to be completed in late 2023
Transportation
2023 Traffic Signal Upgrades
to be completed in late 2023
Transportation
2023 Pedestrian Safety Program
Completed
Transportation
Citywide Lighting Study
to be completed in late 2023
Water
2023 Waterline Overlays
Completed
Water
Phase 12 Annual Replacement Program
Completed
Storm
2023 Stormwater Overlays
Completed
Sewer
2023 Sewer Overlays
Completed
a�
U
0
LL
Q
M
U
a�
N
O
N
4
N
O
N
w
Q
0
Q
c
0
m
a
LL
U
a_
U
N
L
0
a
v
N
O
N
c
m
E
Q
c
d
E
t
cU
w
w
Q
2024 PW UNCIP I December 2023 135 1 Packet Pg. 155
6.2.a
Sewer
PROJECTType
Phase 9 Annual Sewer Replacement/Rehab
Completed
•
Sewer
Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation Phase 3
Completed
Facilities
Parks Restrooms Maintenance
Six -year cost and funding
2024-2029
removed
Facilities
Public Works EV Conduit Addition
Six -year cost and funding
2024-2029
removed
Facilities
City Park Gazebo Roof
Six -year cost and funding
2024-2029
removed
WWTP
Primary Clarifier
Completed
WWTP
Joint Sealant
Completed
WWTP
I Vacuum Filter
lCompleted
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2023 TO 2024)
PROJECTS REVISED
.-
PROJECT
Transportation
Puget Dr. @ OVD Signal Upgrades
Cost and funding moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
Signal Upgrades -100th Ave Q 238th St. SW
Cost and funding moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
Main St. @ 3rd Signal Upgrades
Cost and funding moved from 2026-2027 to 2028-2029
Transportation
228th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI. W Corridor
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2028 to 2027-2029
Transportation
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 3
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2022-2027 to 2023-2028
Transportation
Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 4
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2022-2028 to 2023-2029
Transportation
SR 524 (196th St. SW) / 88th Ave. W - Intersection Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved form 2026-2028 to 2027-2029
Transportation
Main St. @ 9th Ave. Intersection Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
76th Ave. W @ 220th St. SW - Intersection Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2023-2026 to 2024-2027
Transportation
SR-104 Adaptive System -236th to 226th
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2023-2025 to 2024-2027
Transportation
SR-104 @100th Ave W. Intersection Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
SR-104 @ 95th PI. W Intersection Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
SR-104 @ 238th St. SW Intersection Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2043 to 2030-2044
Transportation
Olympic View Dr @ 76th Ave. W Intersection Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2029-2043 to 2030-2044
Transportation
175th St SW Slope Repair
Cost moved from 2026 to 2027
Transportation
232nd St. SW Walkway from 100th Ave. to SR-104
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2027-2028 to 2028-2029
Transportation
236th St. SW Walkway from Madrona Elementary to 97th Ave. W
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2027-2028 to 2028-2029
Transportation
84th Ave. W Walkway from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2028 to 2027-2029
Transportation
80th Ave. W Walkway from 212th St. SW to 206th St. SW
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
80th Ave. W Walkway from 188th St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2028 to 2027-2029
Transportation
Walnut St. Walkway from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave S
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026 to 2027
Transportation
216th St. SW Walkway from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave W
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026 to 2027
Transportation
Maplewood Dr. Walkway from Main St. to 200th St. SW
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2028 to 2027-2029
Transportation
95th PI. W Walkway from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW
Cost and fundingrevised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
SR-104 @ 76th Ave. W Non -Motorized Trans Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2028 to 2027-2029
a�
M
LL
.Q
M
U
rn
N
0
N
v
N
O
N
Q
0
a
r
c
0
.y
d
a
U_
U
a_
U
`0
2
a
le
N
O
N
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 136 1 Packet Pg. 156
6.2.a
.-
PROJECT
Transportation
Downtown Lighting Improvements
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2027 to 2027-2028
Transportation
SR-104 Walkway: HAWK to Pine / Pine from SR-104 to 9th
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2026-2028 to 2027-2029
Transportation
Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St. to Dayton St.
Moved from 2026 to 2027
Transportation
Transportation Plan Update
Cost and funding revised
Transportation
Green Streets 236th St SW - 84th Ave W to Highway 99
Cost and funding revised, moved from 2023-2024 to 2025-2026
Water
Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs and Upgrades
Added estimated construction costs to 2025 and 2026
Storm
Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update
Added grant funding for project to 2024
Storm
7317 Lake Ballinger Way Purchase & Structure Removal
Move $120,000 from 2023 to 2024
Storm
Lake Ballinger Regional Facility Design and Construction
Moved project funding from 2024/2025 to 2026/2027
Storm
Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan
Cost revised from $315,000 in 2023 funds moved to 2024
Sewer
Annual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation
Cost and funding 2025-2029 revised
Sewer
Lake Ballinger Sewer
Cost and funding shifted from 2024-2025 to 2026-2027
WWTP
Nutrient Removal Project
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Cemetery Building
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
City Hall
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Frances Anderson Center
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Fire Station 16
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Fire Station 17
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Fire Station 20
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Fire Life Safety Communications
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Historic Log Cabin
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Historical Museum
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Library
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Meadowdale Club House
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Old Public Works
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Parks Maintenance Building
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Public Safety
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Public Works O&M
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Wade James Theater
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
Facilities
Yost Pool House
Six -year cost and funding 2024-2029 revised
aD
M
LL
M
.Q
m
U
rn
N
O
N
N
O
N
Q
O
a
r
c
O
A
d
W
a
U-
U
a_
U
L
O
2
a
le
N
O
N
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 137 1 Packet Pg. 157
6.2.a
PWF-05 FRANCES ANDERSON
OPTION 2
SUMMARY TABLE AND
PROJECT PAGE
Packet Pg. 158
6.2.a
FACILITIES
PWF-02
Cemetery Building
PWF-03
City Hall
PWF-04
Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station
PWF-05
Frances Anderson Center
PWF-06
Fire Station 16
PWF-07
Fire Station 17
PWF-08
Fire Station 20
PWF-09
Historic Log Cabin
PWF-10
Historical Museum
PWF-11
Library
Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing
PWF-23
Project
PWF-12
Meadowdale Club House
PWF-13
Old Public Works
PWF-14
Parks Maintenance Building
PWF-15
Public Safety
PWF-16
Public Works O&M
PWF-17
Wade James Theater
PWF-18
Yost Pool House
PWF-19
Fire Life Safety Communications
PWF-24
X Landmark 99
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
7P ZU24 ZU25 ZU26 ZU27 ZU213 ZU29 (2024-2029) ZU3U-44 CO
63
$24,048
$8,414
$3,377
$818
$1,000
$0
$37,657
$0
$37,6! um
u_
63
$80,000
$279,064
$70,949
$108,628
$80,000
$0
$618,641
$0
$618,6, ;g
$2,971
$2,918
$5,628
$1,043
$1,500
$0
$14,060
$0
.Q
$14,01 L)
63
$110,000
$98,892
$1,000,000
$113,029
$80,000
$0
$1,401,921
$0
rn
$1,401,9: N
$49,280
$69,388
$30,107
$31,631
$35,000
$0
$215,406
$0
v
$215,41 0
N
$50,000
$221,922
$27,575
$122,245
$45,000
$0
$466,742
$0
$466,7, c
$36,274
$94,248
$69,782
$23,765
$20,000
$0
$244,069
$0
$244,01 Q
$30,000
$546
$1,361
$6,469
$1,500
$0
$39,876
$0
r
$39,8' c
63
$65,000
$10,000
$4,621
$10,199
$5,000
$0
$94,820
$0
y
$94,8: '>
d
63
$100,000
$53,325
$45,038
$35,000
$0
$0
$233,363
$0
$233,31 a
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4,900,000
$0
$4,900,000
$0
LL
$4,900,01 a
$97,091
$7,985
$4,446
$1,159
$5,000
$0
$115,681
$0
$115,61 y
$132,051
$25,000
$25,000
$24,519
$25,000
$0
$231,570
$0
L
$231,5' 0
2
63
$40,320
$9,349
$5,177
$69,228
$20,000
$0
$144,074
$0
$144,0'
a
63
$220,000
$55,169
$151,481
$515,071
$80,000
$0
$1,021,721
$0
$1,021,7: ,*
N
O
63
$180,000
$80,315
$79,348
$43,821
$50,000
$0
$433,484
$0
$433,41 N
$99,077
$43,880
$115,734
$21,872
$25,000
$0
$305,563
$0
r
$305,51 c
d
E
$26,128
$8,409
$19,127
$30,389
$30,000
$0
$114,053
$0
$114,0!
$125,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$125,000
$0
.r
$125,01 Q
$290,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$290,000
$0
$290,01
E
$1,757,240 $1,068,824 $1,658,751 $1,158,886 $5,404,000 $0 $11,047,701 $0 $11,047,71
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023
100 1 Packet Pg. 159
FACILITIES
6.2.a
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)
$605,000
$452,796
$70,917
$0
$0
Fund 016(non-bond proceeds)
$0
$591,028
$276,729
$76,592
$31,500
General Fund
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Water Utility Fund 421
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Stormwater Utility Fund 422
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Sewer Utility Fund 423
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Unsecured Funding
$862,240
$25,000
$1,311,105
$1,082,294
$5,372,500
TOTAL REVENUE
$1,757,240
$1,068,824
$1,658,751
$1,158,886
$5,404,000
$0 $1,128,713
$0 $975,849
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8,653,139
$0 $11,047,701
w
$0
$1,128,7'
U_
$0
$975,8, coo
$0
.Q
U
$0
rn
c
N
$0
c
N
$0
a
$0
0
$8,653,1: Q
$0 $11,047,71
0
.y
d
lY
a
LL
U
a_
U
Y
L
0
:.:
a
N
O
N
C
d
t
V
R
r.+
r
Q
C
N
t
V
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 101
Packet Pg. 160
The Frances Anderson Center serves as the City's main recreation center offering arts, athletic and cultural programing yea
round. Due to the age and high usage of the building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or
restoration.
Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilers with Electric alternatives that will add ventilation, cooling and heating Investment a
grade audit approved by City Council, Replacement of all exterior doors scheduled for 2024, ADA accessible door closures,
Plumbing drainage collector, Restroom remodels (w/ gender neutral consideration), Replacement of all plumbing fixtures,
Addition of building security card readers, Building HVAC controls to maximize efficiency, Fire Sprinkler replacement, and 2
clean building act compliance efforts will be addresses by IGA.)
•
a
u_
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the
U
a
protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. A well maintained facility creates a safe work environmer
U
that is clean and sanitary which promotes workplace efficiency and confidence. Routine and preventative maintenance
L
reduces energy consumption and provides for building systems to operate as designed during manufacturer expected
0
lifespan.
Project Cost
a
prior year p .
N
$110,000 (2024)
O
N
c
Construction\Professional Services $110,000 $98,892 $1,000,000 $113,029 $80,000
m
E
s
Expense Total $110,000 $98,892 $1,000,000 $113,029 $80,000
M
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $110,000 $98,892 $70,917
Q
Fund 016 (non -bond proceeds)
w
_
W
Unsecured Funding $929,083 $113,029 $80,000
E
s
Funding Source Total $110,000 $98,892 $1,000,000 $113,029 $80,000
r
Q
2024 PW CFP/CIP I December 2023 105 1 Packet Pg. 161
�w
- kt-
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
2024-2029
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN &
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
��i'�. � .] . mil', � �r �a.�''l' �_ .rlA •..� 7' r �I • _
... .• fig - .+ t
III�IIILvIIBItf 114EIII11iiI11111inmm�mm�mnnuum
k - `
NOVEMBER 2023 FINAL
"EDMONDS
PARKS. RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Table of Contents
Director's Letter................................................................ 2
CIP/CFP Worksheets.......................................................3-7
Project Distribution Map ................................................. 8
Project Descriptions......................................................9-31
Program Descriptions...................................................32-34
Acquisition Descriptions...............................................35-37
FundDetail.....................................................................
38
Fund 332 (Capital Const. & Impact Fee) Detail ............39-40
Fund 125 (REET 11) Detail ................................................
41
Fund 126 (REET 1) Detail .................................................
42
Fund 143 (Tree) Detail ....................................................
43
Fund 137 (Cemetery) Detail ...........................................
44
Annual Project Comparison ............................................ 45
via
'fi7V
6.2.b
ti EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
September 19, 2023
Members of the City Council, Parks & Planning Board, Staff and Citizens of Edmonds,
The following document outlines the 6-year Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan
(CFP). The CIP/CFP serve as a planning guide identifying parks capital projects and related funding sources and
reflects the priorities established in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan based largely on
citizens' priorities. The CIP/CFP is updated annually through a public process including presentations and Public
Hearings hosted by both the Parks & Planning Board and the City Council.
There were several significant Parks Capital project accomplishments in 2023 to include:
1. Completion of the 8-acre Civic Center Playfield two-year construction project with a June 23rd Grand
Opening.
2. Completion of the 96th Avenue Infiltration project required for Civic Center Playfield which will
significantly reduce the contaminated water run-off into Shell Creek in Yost Park.
3. An Interlocal Agreement with City of Mountlake Terrace supporting the Ballinger Park Phase 3
development to provide improved park access for Edmonds residents.
The 2023 projects in process include:
1. Demolition of the structures on the property donated by Shirley Johnson (abatement completed).
2. Improvements to the Edmonds Lake Ballinger Access (McAleer) area.
3. Improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park — engineering completed, and permit submitted for paved path,
shade structure, permanent restroom and parking improvements.
4. Tree maintenance for large oak trees at 5th and Main.
5. Many deferred maintenance projects throughout the park system.
After completing two significant multi -million -dollar park projects consecutively (Edmonds Waterfront Center and
Civic Center Playfield), the Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department will turn our focus on deferred
maintenance throughout the city's existing parks system and recreation facilities.
Further, the department will remain focused on acquisition of additional parkland to fill system gaps in
park services and to address inequities in parkland distribution as identified in the 2022 PROS Plan.
Your Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department is proud to serve the citizens and visitors of Edmonds and
we look forward keeping the Edmonds parks safe, accessible, and enjoyable for all.
Sincerely,
Angie Feser
Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director
425-771-0256
Angie.Feser@EdmondsWA.gov
Page 2
Packet Pg. 164
6.2.b
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
#
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD*
D19
Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III
$ 200,000
$
$
$
$
$
$ 200,0(
Development. Payment due upon completion of project.
D5
Mathay Ballinger Park *CARRYFORWARD*
D6
Construction of improvements including permanent restroom, paved trail, picnic
$ 271,300
$
$
$
$
$
$ 271,3(
D7
shelter ADA access and other amenities.
Shell Creek Restoration
R19
Stream health and erosion control of Shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based
$ 250,000
$ 380,000
$
$
$
$
$ 630,0(
on existing conditions analysis in 2024. Design, permitting and construction work
in 2025.
Yost Playground & Pool
R6
Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include playground replacement
$
$ 1,296,400
$
$
$
$
$ 1,296,4(
R11
and pool upgrades in 2025.
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
D8
Expansion of the current columbarium. Funding provided through the Cemetery
$
$ 159,100
$
$
$
$
$ 159,1(
Trust Fund 137.
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting
X
D20
In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park
$
$ 1,500,000
$
$
$
$
$ 1,500,0(
and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and
future construction of two additional fields.
Neighborhood Park SE 1
X
D13
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds
$
$ 79,600
$ 819,500
$
$
$
$ 899,1(
(funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
R8
Sierra Park
$
$ -
$ 415,000
$
$
$
$ 415,0(
Playground replacement and upgrade to inclusive standards.
Olympic Beach Park
R7
Replacement of failed ventilation system in coordination with roof replacement
$ 20,000
$ 33,000
$ -
$
$
$
$ 53,0(
(by Facilities / PW)
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
r
Q-
M
U
0a
C
M
a
U)
d
cv
u_
to
U
N
O
N
4
N
O
N
SZ
O
Q
Page 3 Packet Pg. 165
6.2.b
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
#
D10
Pine Street Park
D11
Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables,
$
$ 40,000
$ 124,400
$
$
$
$ 164,4(
D12
canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway.
Johnson Property
R2
Master plan for future park use. Site development not included in estimate.
$
$
$ 82,000
$
$
$
$ 82,0(
P5
Demolition, debris removal and site security completed in 2023.
Neighborhood Park SR99
X
D15
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$
$
$ 82,000
$ 844,100
$
$
$ 926,1(
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
x
P1
Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building
$
$
$ 1,125,500
$ 4,637,100
$
$
$ 5,762,6(
D2
Replace and/or renovate shop facilities located in City Park.
R12
Maplewood Hill Park
$
$
$ -
$ 347,800
$
$
$ 347,8(
Playground replacement.
Neighborhood Park SE 2
X
D18
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$
$
$
$ 84,400
$ 869,500
$
$ 953,9(
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
Waterfront Walkway
P3
Connecting the waterfront walkway from Brackett's Landing North to
$
$
$
$
$ 515,000
$ 819,500
$ 1,334,5(
D14
Marina Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide
_
Condominiums, to provide ADA improvements.
R16
Seaview Park
$
$
$
$
$ 417,900
$ -
$ 417,9(
Replacement of permanent restroom to provide ADA upgrades.
Elm Street Park
D1 6
D1
Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground,
$
$
$
$
$ 100,000
$ 340,370
$ 440,3;
small shelter with picnic tables, habitat restoration and public process to consider
R14
possible off -leash dog park area.
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
r
Q-
M
U
0a
C
M
a
w
cv
u_
R
to
U
rn
N
O
N
N
O
N
Q
O
Q
Page 4 Packet Pg. 166
6.2.b
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
#
X
R15
Pool Replacement
$
$ _
$ -
$ _
$
$ 23,881,000
$ 23,881,0(
Replacement of the existing Yost pool. Design, location, and funding TBD.
Meadowdale Playfields
R3
Renovations as suggested by the City of Lynnwood and consistent with re
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$
negotiated and updated Interlocal Agreement. May include addition of dugout
-
roofs, athletic field light replacement and turf.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
Master Plan development and implementation of the Edmonds Marsh to daylight
X
P4
D9
the waterway connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and two fresh
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$
water creeks providing restoration of fresh water/salt water estuary and natural
-
D1
tidal exchange. (All expenses are TBD per Council direction in December 2022).
Acquisition funding identified in Parkland Acquisition program.
(A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS
$ 741,300
$ 3,488,100
$ 2,648,400
$ 5,913,400
$ 1,902,400
$ 25,040,870
$ 3%734,4;
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year
Tot:
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
R17
Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular and deferred maintenance,
$ 450,000
$
450,000
$
450,000
$
450,000
$
450,000
$
450,000
$
2,700,0(
repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment.
Signage & Wayfinding
R10
Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a
$ 75,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
75,0(
consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system.
Parkland Acquisition Support
$
$
50,000
$
50,000
$
50,000
$
50,000
$
50,000
$
250,0(
Funds utilized to evaluate potential acquisitions and complete due diligence.
Debt Service and Interfund Transfers
Debt service on Civic Park $1.6M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to
$ 123,000
$
123,000
$
123,000
$
123,000
$
123,000
$
123,000
$
738,0(
Engineering for Capital Project Support.
(B) SUBTOTAL - PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
$ 648,000
$
623,000
$
623,000
$
623,000
$
623,000
$
623,000
$
3,763,0(
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
r
Q.
M
U
0a
C
ca
a
vJ
w
cv
u_
.r
.Q
co
U
rn
N
0
N
N
0
N
SZ
O
a
Page 5 Packet Pg. 167
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
6.2.b
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
PARKLAND ACQUISITION
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
X
A2
Neighborhood Park SE 1
$ 1,500,000
$ -
$
$
$
$
$ 1,500,0(
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
X
A3
Neighborhood Park SR99
$ -
$ 1,545,000
$
$
$
$
$ 1,545,0(
Acquisition of parkland near SR 99.
X
A4
Neighborhood Park SE 2
$
$ -
$ 2,185,500
$
$
$
$ 2,185,5(
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
A5
Interurban Trail
$
$
$ -
$
$
$ 895,585
$ 895,5E
Acquisition for trail extension.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
X
Al
Acquisition of the Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$
restoration.
(C) SUBTOTAL - PARKLAND ACQUISITION
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,545,000
$ 2,185,500
$ -
$
$ 895,585
$ 6,126,0i
Q-
U
06
c
ca
a
2D
:r
cv
u_
R
..1
.Q
to
U
rn
N
O
N
4
N
O
N
O
Q
(D) TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B+C) $ 2,889,300 $ 5,656,100 $ 5,456,900 $ 6,536,400 $ 2,525,400 $ 26,559,455 $ 49,623,5! d
u_
U
PARKS CIP REVENUE
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot:
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,01
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 9,500,0
Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 1,800,0
Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 1,290,0
Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - Columbarium Expansion
$ 159,100
$ 159,1(
ARPA Contribution
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
Investment Interest (3%)
$ 18,918
$ 24,795
$ 30,849
$ 37,085
$ 43,507
$ 50,122
$ 205,2-
Donations
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$
Bond Proceeds
$ -
$
$
$
$
$
$
Secured Grants (Snohomish County Conservation Futures)
$ 880,000
$
$
$
$
$
$ 880,0(
Unsecured Grants/Funding - Land Acquisition
$ 175,000
$
$
$
$
$
$ 175,0(
Unsecured Grants/Funding - non -land acquisition
$ -
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,945,000
$ 5,481,200
$ 869,500
$ 24,756,800
$ 34,552,5(
(E) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE
$ 3,788,918
$ 3,898,895
$ 4,190,849
$ 7,733,285
$ 3,128,007
$ 27,021,922
$ 49,761,8,
a_
V
I:
t
c�
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) w
Q
Page 6 Packet Pg. 168
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
6.2.b
Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(F) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 3,150,795
$ 4,050,413
$ 2,293,208
$ 1,027,157
$ 2,224,042
$ 2,826,649
(E) Revenue
$ 3,788,918
$ 3,898,895
$ 4,190,849
$ 7,733,285
$ 3,128,007
$ 27,021,922
(D) Expenditures
$ 2,889,300
$ 5,656,100
$ 5,456,900
$ 6,536,400
$ 2,525,400
$ 26,559,455
(G) Ending Fund Balance (F+E-D)
$ 4,050,413
$ 2,293,208
$ 1,027,157
$ 2,224,042
$ 2,826,649
$ 3,289,117
Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new)
Page 7 Packet Pg. 169
6.2.b
P5 Johnson Property
R3 Meadowdale Playfields
D6 Mathay Ballinger Park
R6, R11 Yost Playground & Pool
D19 Lake Ballinger Park (MLT)
D8 Columbarium Expansion - Phase II i
R7 Olympic Beach Park
D10, D11, D12 Pine Street Park
R8 Sierra Park
P3, D14 Waterfront Walkway
R12 Maplewood Hill Park
P4, D9, D1 Edmonds Marsh Restoration _
D16, D17, R14 Elm Street Park
P1, D2 Parks Maintenance Building
R16 Seaview Park
R15 Pool Replacement
Al Edmonds Marsh Restoration I
A5 Interurban Trail �I ,
R19 Shell Creek Restoration �
D20 Woodway Campus Athletic
Complex EN`�
* Non -site specific projects
A2 , P2, D13
Neighborhood Park SE 1
A3, P6, D15
Neighborhood Park SR99
A4, P7, D18
Neighborhood Park SE 2
R17
Citywide Park Improvements
R10
Signage & Wayfinding
���M_N ■ice=:■■i■i F__A�
P4
R7 �1=
Al • •D9
Mill ORA
MrA
XV14
19
•
* Site specific projects only.
Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown
DRAFT I Packet Pg. 170
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
PROJECTS
4EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Page 9
Packet Pg. 171
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Lake Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA — D19
Interurban Trail
° Improved Park Entry y
or
6 ft Wood Chips Path
6 ft Gravel Path%
F— Boardwalk & Viewing Platform
Lake Ballinger
dill
Proposed Crossing by the U.S.
41 -Army Corps of Engineers
"v Senior Center
Proposed Channel by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Oil
Lake Ballinger Park, City of Mountlake Terrace
k _ x.
1'-,;.
Y
Proposed Boardwalk by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers
Project Summary: Through an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mountlake Terrace, the City of Edmonds will
support the construction of the planned improvements in the northwest area of Lake Ballinger Park including a park
entry, pathways and access to Lake Ballinger. The project is underway and payment is due upon completion of the
project.
Project Justification: This western boundary of the park is Edmonds city limits and these improvements will provide
better access to Lake Ballinger Park for Edmonds residents. The revenue contribution supports the construction of the
improvements which will benefit the City of Edmonds. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and
Open Space (PROS) Plan including 3 Recommendations, 1 Goal and 3 Objectives. Recommendation 1.2 Expand
partnerships and agreements with other nearby jurisdictions. Recommendation 3.6 Explore options for access to Lake
Ballinger with the City of Mountlake Terrace to include possible joint development and consideration of a fishing pier.
Recommendation 5.2 Repair and improve or extend trails and boardwalks to allow improved public access to natural
areas for nature/wildlife viewing, hiking and outdoor experience. PROS Goal 3, Objectives 3.2, 3.8 and 3.11.
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Page 10
Packet Pg. 172
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Mathay Ballinger Park - D6
24100 78th Place West
Project Summary: Park improvements to Mathay Ballinger Park began in 2023 and are continuing into 2024.
Improvements include the addition of a permanent restroom, a shelter with picnic tables and a paved pathway to
provide ADA accessibility to the playground as well as connect the paved Interurban Trail spur. Approximately
$228,000 was expended in 2023 for the engineering, permitting and restroom procurement.
Project Justification: Upgrades to this park are supported by 5 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 8 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.3 is to prioritize improvements to Mathay
Ballinger Park and upgrade, enhance or replace park amenities, specifically the play amenities. Recommendation 3.5
is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park... and paved pathway connections
in Mathay Ballinger Park. Recommendation 6.4 is to install permanent restrooms at Marina Beach Park and Mathay
Ballinger Park. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.6, Goal 3 Objectives 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9 Goal 9 Objective 9.1
and Recommendations 3.1 and 6.2 also align with these upgrades.
Estimated Cost: $499,300 (approx. $228,000 expended in 2023)
Page 11
Packet Pg. 173
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Shell Creek Restoration — R19
Shell Creek, Yost Park
Project Summary: The overall goal of this project is the restoration of Shell Creek ecosystem in Yost Park. Phase
1 is the completion of a preliminary Existing Conditions Analysis scheduled to be conducted in 2024 which will
determine what improvements are needed to support a healthy environment for the natural ecosystem within
the park as it relates to Shell Creek in its entirety within park boundaries including stream bank and bed erosion.
Phase 2 is the restoration work as identified and prioritized in the Analysis including design, permit and
construction and may include habitat and environmental protection and enhancement, mitigation opportunities,
and bridge, trail and boardwalk replacement/relocation, concrete structure removal or modification.
Project Justification: The 45-acre Yost Park, containing a portion of Shell Creek, has a need to prevent erosive
conditions. With Shell Creek being a salmon -bearing stream silting issues caused by erosion within Yost Park
impact spawning habitat. Erosion has caused closure of a pedestrian bridge in the upper creek corridor in the park,
causing significant impact to trail users by lack of ability to cross the creek to access both sides of the park. In
addition, other pedestrian bridges are deteriorating and in short order, require replacement.
2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan - Goal 3: Parks, Trails & Open Space, Objectives 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9;
Goal 4: Waterfront Use & Access, Objectives 4.2 and 4.4; Goal 5: Natural Resource & Habitat Conservation
Objectives, 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6: Climate Change, Adaptation & Resiliency, Objective 6.5; and Goal 9: Park
Operations & Administration Objectives 9.1 and 9.2.
Estimated Cost: $630,000
Construction (R19) — Creek Restoration
$250,000
2028 2029 Total
$250,000
Construction (R4) — Bridge, Trail, Stream
$380,000
$380,000
Total Expenses
$250,000
$380,000
$630,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II — Fund 125
$250,000
$380,000
$630,000
Total Revenue
$250,000
$380,000
$630,000
Page 12
Packet Pg. 174
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Yost Playground & Pool - R6 & R11
fry
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: Future park enhancements, repair, and maintenance to include a playground replacement and
pool. The playground at Yost Park has reached the end of its lifecycle being 27 years old having been installed in 1995,
and is not ADA accessible. Both playground replacement and pool improvements including re -plastering are
scheduled for 2025.
Project Justification: To maintain safety amenities should be repaired and/or replaced as supported in the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan Recommendation 3.1 which is to maintain, renovate or replace aging or
damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety and Recommendation
3.4 replace the playgrounds at... Yost Memorial Park. In addition, this work is supported by PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective
1.1 and 1.4; Goal 3, Objective 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4, Objective 4.4, Goal 5, Objective 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.5; Goal
9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.10 and 6.2 for a total of 4 Recommendations, 6 Goals and 9 Objectives.
Estimated Cost: $1,296,400
Page 13
Packet Pg. 175
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Olympic Beach Park - R7
200 Admiral Way, Entrance of the Fishing Pier
Project Summary: Replacement of non -operable ventilation system while roof replacement project is completed
(Public Works — Facilities Division)
Project Justification: This work is supported by 3 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach,
Seaview Park and Brackett's Landing North. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 4, Objective 4.1; Goal 9, Objective
9.1 and Recommendation 6.3 also align with these upgrades.
Estimated Cost: $53,000
Planning (R7) — Restroom Renovation
0-
$20,000
$20,000
Construction (R7) — Restroom Renovation
$33,000 $33,000
Total Expenses
$20,000
$33,000 $53,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$20,000
$33,000 $53,000
Total Revenue
$20,000
Mr
$33,000 $53,000
*Project moved earlier to 2024 per Council direction.
Page 14
Packet Pg. 176
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
D20: Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase I Lighting
23200 1001h Ave. W
Project Summary: This project consists of two components: Phase I lighting addition, Phase II renovation of
existing underdeveloped athletic field and would be coordinated with the property owner, Edmonds School
District.
Project Justification: By adding lighting to the renovated Phase I year-round field, usage of the multi -use facility
would significantly increase. Phase II would renovate a currently poorly maintained and underutilized large
athletic field to provide community significantly more multi -sport use of an existing facility. This Athletic Complex
serves a densely populated area of more than 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance costs
could be offset by user fees. Phase I without lighting installation was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phase II
estimated at $6-8M with funding and timing undetermined. This partnership improvement is supported by a
Recommendation, 2 Goals and 5 Objectives in the 2022 PROS Plan including Recommendation 3.2 "expand
partnerships and agreements with Edmonds School District ... to provide public access and opportunities for
outdoor recreation". And PROS Plan Goal 3, Objectives 3.3, 3.9, 3.10 and 3.11; and Goal 9, Objective 9.4.
Estimated Cost: Phase I Lighting: $1,500,000; Phase II: $6 — 8M
Page 15
Packet Pg. 177
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SE 1— P2, D13
Project Summary: Acquire and develop an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address an
existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized (see
Land Acquisition Section for details) a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding
community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1
Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor.
PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and
3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park.
Estimated Cost: $899,100 + Parkland Acquisition
Planning— Neighborhood Park SE 1 (P2)
$79,600
$79,600
Construction — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (D13)
$819,500
$819,500
Total Expenses
$79,600 $819,500
$899,100
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$79,600
$79,600
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$79,600
$0 00
$79,600
i0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 16
Packet Pg. 178
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Sierra Park — R8
81st Ave W & 190th St SW
Project Summary: Replacement of the playground and fall surfacing at Sierra Park. The playground is 27 years old and
is currently the smallest and most limited playground in the park system. The new playground is intended to be
inclusive level design.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at
Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8, Goal
9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.1 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $415,000
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 17
Packet Pg. 179
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Pine Street Park - D10, D11 & D12
r
Project Summary: Park improvements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, canopy shade trees
and a paved interior connecting pathway.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.5 is to add amenities to existing parks, such
as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park and paved pathway connections in
Mathay Ballinger Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and
Recommendation 6.2 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $164,400
Planning (D10, 11, 12) $40,000
2028 2029
Total
$40,000
Construction (D10) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables
$59,600
$59,600
Construction (D11) — Paved Pathway
$38,300
$38,300
Construction (D12) — Canopy Shade Trees
$26,500
$26,500
Total Expenses $40,000
$124,400
$164,400
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $40,000
$124,400
$164,400
Total Revenue $40,000
$124,400
$164,400
Page 18
Packet Pg. 180
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Maplewood Hill Park — R12
19800 89th PI W
Project Summary: Replacement of the existing playground installed in 1985. This playground is 38 years old and is
the oldest in the park system.
Project Justification: This improvement is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 3 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.4 is to replace the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill
Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1
and Recommendation 3.1 also align with this improvement.
Estimated Cost: $347,800
Page 19
Packet Pg. 181
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SR 99 — P6 & D15
Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SR 99 area to address an
existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized (see
Land Acquisition Section for details) a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding
community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1
Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor.
PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and
3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park.
Estimated Cost: $926,100 + Parkland Acquisition
Planning— Neighborhood Park SR99 (P6)
$82,000
$82,000
Construction — Neighborhood Park SR 99 (D15)
$844,100
$844,100
Total Expenses
7
$82,000 $844,100
$926,100
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$82,000
$82,000
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$82,000
$0 00
$82,000
00
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 20
Packet Pg. 182
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Johnson Property - P5
9309 Bowdoin Way
Project Summary: This project is to design a master plan for this 1-acre property donated by Shirley Johnson in 2021.
The house and outbuildings were removed in 2023. The site includes historic fruit and nut trees which have all been
neglected for years. The master planning process uses a combination of park system -wide goals (PROS Plan), property
opportunities and constraints and community input on future design and usage for the space and provides supporting
documentation for potential grants for future improvements.
Project Justification: This project is supported by 1 Recommendation, 5 Goals and 11 Objectives of the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.1 — Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged
infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1;
Goal 3, Objective 3.7, 3.8 and 3.10; Goal 5, Objective 5.1; Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5; Goal 9, Objectives 9.1,
9.3 and 9.5 also align with this project.
Estimated Cost: $82,000
Page 21
Packet Pg. 183
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building - P1 & D2
600 3rd Avenue South, City Park
Project Summary: Replacement of 40+ year old Parks and Facilities Maintenance building and renovation of the yard
area in City Park. Currently undersized to accommodate staff, vehicles and equipment, mechanical work spaces and
employee facilities and the facility is reaching the end of its useful life.
Project Justification: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work
areas and fixed equipment storage in order to more efficiently maintain City parks and Capital facilities. The city's
small equipment repair garage is used as the Park Maintenance locker room, daily meeting room, computer access
(two for 17 FTEs) and work preparation space. It is insufficient for work efficiency and creates a conflicting work space
of small machinery repair and gathering space. This project is supported by 1 Goals, 3 Objectives in the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.9 align with this project.
Estimated Cost: $5,762,600
Planning & Design (P1)
$1,125,500
$1,125,500
Construction (D2)
$4,637,100
$4,637,100
Total Expenses
$1,125,500
$4,637,100
$5,762,600
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Park Impact Fees — Fund 332-100
Bond Proceeds
Operating Contribution — General Fund
Park Donations
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
00
00
.00
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 22
Packet Pg. 184
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Columbarium Expansion Phase II — D8
820 15th St SW, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery
Project Summary: Expansion of the Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Columbarium. Funding provided through the
Cemetery Trust Fund 137 which accumulates fund balance based on Cemetery usage and revenue generated.
Project Justification: As the existing columbarium continues to fill up, it is appropriate to begin planning for the Phase
II expansion. The design is complete and since it is continuation of phase improvements, could be relatively simple to
implement.
Estimated Cost: $159,100
Page 23
Packet Pg. 185
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Waterfront Walkway Completion — Ebb Tide Section - P3 & D14
t
Beachfront in front of Ebb Tide Condominiums (200 Beach Place)
Project Summary: This improvement would provide a continuous ADA accessible waterfront walkway from Brackett's
Landing North to Marina Beach Park ensuring all individuals, including those with mobility challenges and those using
wheeled carriers can safely enjoy the waterfront. The final missing piece is a constructed pathway beach side of the
Ebb Tide condominiums in the easement owned by the City of Edmonds.
Project Justification: To provide public ADA access along the waterfront for all individuals. Completion of the walkway
would meet ADA requirements, support efforts to keep dogs off of the beaches and was recognized as a high priority
by residents participating in the development of the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. This project is
supported by 1 Recommendation, 3 Goals and 5 Objectives in the PROS Plan. Recommendation 6.2 is to implement
upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure
universal accessibility to include required parking, providing ramped entrances and site furnishings. PROS Plan Goal 3,
Objective 3.8; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4, Goal 6, Objective 6.7 also align with this project.
Estimated Cost: $1,334,500
Planning & Design
$515,000
$515,000
Construction
$819,500 $819,500
Total Expenses
$515,000
$819,500 $1,334,500
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$515,000
$515,000
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$515,000
$515,000
ii 00
Page 24
Packet Pg. 186
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SE 2 — P7, D18
FOU
Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address
an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition (see Land Acquisition
Section for details) has been authorized a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding
community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 11 Objectives in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1
Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor.
PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and
3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park.
Estimated Cost: $953,900 + Parkland Acquisition
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 25
Packet Pg. 187
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Seaview Park Restroom — R16
80th Ave W & 186th St SW
Project Summary: Improvements to include renovation or replacement of the permanent restroom to provide ADA
compliant facilities.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 3 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 6 is to make improvements to existing parks
as needed to ensure proper maintenance, usability and quality of park features and grounds to remove barriers and
improve universal access. Recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park
and Brackett's Landing North. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendations 3.1 and
6.2 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $417,900
Page 26
Packet Pg. 188
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Elm Street Park- D16, D17 & R14
7th & Elm Street
Project Summary: Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, small shelter with picnic tables,
habitat restoration and pubic process to consider possible off -leash dog park area.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.1 is to add amenities to existing parks, such
as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 6, Objective 6.5; Goal
9, Objective 9.1; and Recommendation 3.5 also align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $440,370
Planning (R14, D16, D17)
$100,000
$100,000
Construction (R14) — Habitat Restoration
$56,300
$56,300
Construction (D16) — Nature Playground
$199,670
$199,670
Construction (D17) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables
$84,400
$84,400
Total Expenses
$100,000
$340,370
$440,370
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$100,000
$284,070
$384,070
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$100,000
$0
$284,070
0i
$384,070
00
Page 27
Packet Pg. 189
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Yost Pool Replacement — R15
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: Yost Pool was built nearly 50 years ago and continues to provide recreational opportunities for
many residents and visitors. In addition to teaching youth lifesaving water safety, the pool serves as an opportunity
for community members of all ages to lead healthy and active lifestyles. Funding for this project has not been
identified and would likely require voter approval.
Project Justification: Replacing Yost Pool is supported by 4 Recommendations, 4 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 4 is to replace Yost Pool. PROS Plan Goal 1,
Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 7, Objective 7.4; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendations
3.1, 4.1, 4.2 and 6.2 also align with this replacement.
Estimated Cost: $23,881,000
Planning & Construction (1115)
2027 2028
2029
$23,881,000
Total
$23,881,000
Total Expenses
$23,881,000
$23,881,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Secured Grants
Bonds
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$0
000($23,881,00011
$0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 28
Packet Pg. 190
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Meadowdale Playfields - R3
1681h ST SW, Lynnwood
Project Summary: Currently identifying potential budget allocation for shared improvements and related
expenditures dependent upon pending Interlocal Agreement negotiations.
Project Justification: The cities of Lynnwood and Edmonds and Edmonds School District currently have an Interlocal
Agreement (ILA) for Meadowdale Park for shared cost of capital improvements, renovations, and ongoing
maintenance. This work is supported by 2 Recommendations, 3 Goals and 5 Objectives of the 2022 Parks, Recreation
and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 1.2 — Expand partnerships and agreements with the Edmonds School
District, Snohomish County, and other nearby jurisdictions (cities of Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, Woodway, and
Shoreline) to improve public access and opportunities for outdoor recreation and Recommendation 6.2 - Implement
upgrades and improvements to park facilities to conform with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure
universal accessibility to include required parking, providing ramped entrances and site furnishings. PROS Plan Goal 2,
Objective 2.6; Goal 3, Objective 3.8, 3.10 and 3.11 and Goal 7, Objective 7.2 also align with this work.
Estimated Cost: TBD, negotiations are ongoing with the City of Lynnwood.
0-
Construction (R3)
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Total Expenses
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Ending Fund Balance/Impact Fees - 332
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Total Revenue
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
i
TBD
TBD
TBD
Page 29
Packet Pg. 191
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Edmonds Marsh -Estuary Expansion & Restoration - Al, P4, D9 & D1
Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh, Marina Beach Park and property owned by Unocal (Chevron)
Project Summary: Reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh near -shore estuary by restoring the natural
tidal exchange. This project will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation including
daylighting of Willow Creek within the park and the Edmonds Marsh. In addition, this project encompasses the
possible acquisition or use of the adjacent 21-acre parcel known as the Unocal property to support a larger estuary
restoration project. Once acquired, an integrated restoration plan can be developed to restore functioning conditions
of the tidal wetland for salmon recovery, wildlife conservation and improved public access for recreational use,
environmental education and wildlife viewing.
Project Justification: The marsh estuary restoration project will allow for and provide a natural tidal exchange, allow
salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek, support migratory birds and waterfowl, provide a natural redistribution
of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna and address sea level rise impacts. This project is supported by 3
Recommendations, 5 Goals and 8 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 2.2 — Expand the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary to include the Unocal property. Develop funding strategy
for purchase of the Unocal property or negotiate with the State of Washington to have the property become part of
the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 4, Objective 4.3; Goal 5, Objectives 5.1, 5.3 and
5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.5 and 6.7; Goal 9, Objective 9.1; Recommendation 2.1 and 3.11 also align with this project.
Estimated Cost: TBD Acquisition and Planning + Restoration + Marina Beach Park renovation
Continued on next page.
Page 30
Packet Pg. 192
6.2.b
Edmonds Marsh -Estuary Expansion & Restoration— continued.
.
2027
2028
2029
Total
Land Acquisition (Al)
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Master Plan (134)
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Master Plan Implementation (D9)
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Restoration (D1) - TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Total Expenses
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Real Estate Excise Tax I — Fund 126
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Bond Proceeds
Secured Grants
Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition
Park Donations
Operating Contribution — General Fund
Stormwater — Fund 422
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
D
Project Accounting #M070
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Expense estimates and funding sources changed to TBD per Council direction December 2022.
Page 31
Packet Pg. 193
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
PROGRAMS
v EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Page 32
Packet Pg. 194
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program - R17
...W.
f
Project Summary: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) plan identified a significant list of deferred park
maintenance projects. With the addition of a Parks Capital Project Manager, hired in 2022 and the Job Order
Contracting program, the Parks Department will continue to make progress on the numerous system -wide repairs,
renovations and replacements of an aging parks infrastructure.
Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and related assets lead to higher deferred maintenance costs,
increased City liability and decreased level of service and community satisfaction. This program is supported by 5
Recommendations, 6 Goals and 21 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 3.1 is to Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties
to ensure public accessibility, use and safety. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objectives 3.6, 3.7, 3.8
and 3.9; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2, 4.4; Goal 5, Objective 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5 and 6.7;
Goal 9, Objective 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.9 and Recommendations 3.7, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 also align with this program.
Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 (6-year total)
2024
2025i
Repair & Maintenance $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000
Professional Services $150,000
$150,000
$150,000 $150,000
$150,000
$150,000
$900,000
Total Expenses $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000
$2,700,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000
$2,700,000
Total Revenue $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000
Unsecured Funding i i i i
Page 33
Packet Pg. 195
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Signage & Wayfinding — R10
• VIEW POINT PLAY STRUCTURE
NATURAL AREA&DOG WALK
PARK OPEN DAWN TO DUSK
Project Summary: Update park and recreation facilities signage system -wide to include uniform and accurate trail
identification information, orientation markers, safety and regulatory messaging, park hours, park rules and etiquette,
interpretive information and warning signs.
Project Justification: A comprehensive and consistent signage system is necessary to inform, orient and educate park
users. This program is supported by 2 Recommendations, 4 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and
Opens Space (PROS) plan. Recommendation 6.5 is to develop and provide consistent graphics and citywide signage to
improve communication on access, usability and "branding" of the city's park and open space system. PROS Plan Goal
2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objective 3.6; Goal 5, Objectives 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and
Recommendation 6.2 also align with this program.
Estimated Cost: $75,000
Page 34
Packet Pg. 196
6.2.b
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
PARKLAND
ACQUISITION
.sw
Y
n
EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Page 35
Packet Pg. 197
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Parkland Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1, SR 99 & SE 2 - A2, A3 & A4
Project Summary: Acquisition of parkland that will benefit citizens and support the priorities identified in the PROS
Plan. Currently, $1,100,000 is reserved for parkland and open space acquisition. These funds were accumulated from
2019 through 2023. There is no specific request to purchase a particular parcel as opportunities are somewhat limited
in a mostly built -out city, but staff continues to search for, develop and negotiate opportunities.
Project Justification: Parkland Acquisitions are supported by 1 Recommendation, 2 Goals and 5 Objectives (land
purchase only, see previous projects for development) in the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Recommendation 1 is to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas
such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor. PROS Plan Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.1, 3.2,
3.3 and 3.9 also align with the acquisition of parkland.
Estimated Cost: $5,230,500
i
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (A2)
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3)
$1,545,000
$1,545,000
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4)
$2,185,500
$2,185,500
Total Expenses
$1,500,000
$1,545,000
$2,185,500
$5,230,500
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126
$325,000
$200,000
$200,000
$725,000
Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD
$120,000
$120,000
Snohomish County Conservation Futures
$880,000
$880,000
Total Revenue
$1,325,000
$200,000
$200,000
$1,725,000
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Page 36
Packet Pg. 198
6.2.b
Parks & Recreation
Interurban Trail Expansion — A5
24100 78th Place West
Project Summary: Acquisition of additional lands, easements and/or right-of-ways to continue the Interurban Trail,
including more off -road segments.
Project Justification: This Expansion is supported by 3 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 6 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 5 is to improve trail connections including
sidewalks and bike lanes to help link destinations across the community. Recommendation 5.1 suggests the City
peruse opportunities to acquire additional lands, easements and/or right of way to continue the Interurban Trail. Goal
2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.6 and Recommendations 1.1 and 5.2 also align with this
expansion.
Estimated Cost: $895,585
2024 2025 2026Total
Land Acquisition — Park Facilities (A5) $895,585 $895,585
Total Expenses $895,585 $895,585
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126
Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding ($895,585) ($895,585)
Page 37
Packet Pg. 199
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
FUND DETAIL
v EDMONDS
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES
Page 38
Packet Pg. 200
Fund 332
6.2.b
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Fund 332 Expenditures
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
D9
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan Implementation)
$
D1
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Restoration)
$ -
R14
Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration
$ 56,300
$ 56,300
D6
Mathay Ballinger Park Permanent Restrooms
$ -
R3
Meadowdale Playfields (Renovations, City of Lynnwood ILA)
$
A2
Neighborhood Park -SE1 (Park Acquisition)
$ 1,055,000
D13
Neighborhood Park -SE1 (Park Development)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
D15
Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Park Development)
$ 844,100
$ 844,100
D18
Neighborhood Park -SE2 (Park Development)
$ 869,500
$ 869,500
R15
Pool Replacement
$23,881,000
$ 23,881,000
P1
Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design)
$ 1,125,500
$ 1,125,500
D2
Parks Facilities M&O Building (Construction)
$ 4,637,100
$ 4,637,100
D14
Waterfront Walkway (Construction)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
D20
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
Interfund Services
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 150,000
Debt Service Civic Park $1.6M (2021)
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 98,000
$ 588,000
(C) TOTAL Fund 332 Expenditures
$ 1,178,000
$ 1,623,000
$ 2,068,000
$ 5,604,200
$ 992,500
1 $24,879,800
$35,290,500
Fund 332 Revenue
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Park Impact Fees (Fund 332-100)
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 1,800,000
Investment Interest (3%)
$ 18,918
$ 24,795
$ 30,849
$ 37,085
$ 43,507
$ 50,122
$ 205,277
Miscellaneous Park Donations
$ -
Bond Proceeds
$ -
Conservation Futures Grant - Neighborhood Park SE 1 (Acquisition)
$ 880,000
$ 880,000
Unsecured Funding - Neighborhood Park SE 1 (Acquisition)
$ 175,000
Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SR99 (Development)
$ 819,500
Unsecured Funding - Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase 1
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
Unsecured Grants - Marsh Estuary Restoration
$ -
Unsecured Grants - Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration
$ 56,300
$ 56,300
Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SR99 (Development)
$ 844,100
$ 844,100
Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SE 2 (Development)
$ 869,500
$ 869,500
Unsecured Funding (Bonds, Levy, Misc.) Pool Replacement
$ 23,881,000
$ 23,881,000
Unsecured Funding Park Facilities M&O Building
$ 1,125,500
$ 4,637,100
$ 5,762,600
Unsecured Grants - Waterfront Walkway (Construction)
$ 819,500
$ 819,500
(D) TOTAL Fund 332 Revenue
$ 1,373,918
$ 1,824,795
$ 2,275,849
$ 5,818,285
$ 1,213,007
$25,106,922
$36,618,277
.r
Q
Page 39
Packet Pg. 201
Fund 332
6.2.b
Fund 332 Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance (332 + 332-100)
$ 630,594
$ 826,512
$ 1,028,308
$ 1,236,157
$ 1,450,242
$ 1,670,749
(D) Revenue
$ 1,373,918
$ 1,824,795
$ 2,275,849
$ 5,818,285
$ 1,213,007
$25,106,922
(C) Expenditures
$ 1,178,000
$ 1,623,000
$ 2,068,000
$ 5,604,200
$ 992,500
$24,879,800
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 826,512
1 $ 1,028,308
1 $ 1,236,157
1 $ 1,450,242
1 $ 1,670,749
1 $ 1,897,871
Project Type:
A Acquisition
P Master Planning
D Development - New
R Replacement / Upgrade
Page 40
Packet Pg. 202
REET II Fund 125
6.2.b
Costs inflated at 3% per year
REET II(Fund 125)Expenditures
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
P4
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan)
$ -
D16
Elm Street Park (Nature Playground)
$ 100,000
$ 199,670
$ 299,670
D17
Elm Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables)
$ 84,400
$ 84,400
R2
Johnson Property (Demo & Secure Site)
$
P5
lJohnson Property (Master Plan)
$ 82,000
$ 82,000
R12
Maplewood Hill Park (Playground Replacement)
$ 347,800
$ 347,800
D5
Mathay Ballinger Park (Paved Loop Pathway)
$
D7
Mathay Ballinger Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables)
$ -
D6
Mathay Ballinger Park Permanent Restrooms
$ 271,300
$ 271,300
D19
Mountlake Terrace ILA (Lake Ballinger Park)*
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
P2
Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Master Plan)
$ 79,600
$ 79,600
P6
Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Master Plan)
$ 82,000
$ 82,000
P7
Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Master Plan)
$ 84,400
$ 84,400
R7
Olympic Beach Park (Restroom Upgrade)
$ 20,000
$ 33,000
$ 53,000
D10
Pine Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables)
$ 20,000
$ 59,600
$ 79,600
D11
Pine Street Park (Paved Connecting Pathway)
$ 20,000
$ 38,300
$ 58,300
D12
Pine Street Park (Canopy Shade Trees)
$ 26,500
$ 26,500
R16
Seaview Park (Restroom Replacement)
$ 417,900
$ 417,900
R19
Shell Creek Restoration (Yost Park)
$ 250,000
$ 380,000
$ 630,000
R8
Sierra Park (Playground Replacement)
$ 415,000
$ 415,000
P3
Waterfront Walkway Design Completion
$ 515,000
$ 515,000
R11
Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation
$ 546,400
$ 546,400
R6
Yost Park (Playground Replacement - Inclusive)
$ 750,000
$ 750,000
R10
Signage and Wayfinding
$ 75,000
1
1
1
1 $ 75,000
R17
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 2,700,000
(C) TOTAL PARKS REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures
$ 1,266,300
$ 2,279,000
$ 1,153,400
$ 882,200
$ 1,482,900
$ 734,070
$ 7,797,870
REET II(Fund 125)Revenue
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 9,500,000
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 9,500,000
REET II (Fund 125) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 1,222,000
$
1,955,700
$
1,176,700
$
1,523,300
$ 2,141,100
$
2,158,200
(D) Revenue
$ 2,000,000
$
1,500,000
$
1,500,000
$
1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$
1,500,000
(C) Expenditures
$ 1,266,300
$
2,279,000
$
1,153,400
$
882,200
$ 1,482,900
$
734,070
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 1,955,700
$
1,176,700
$
1,523,300
$
2,141,100
$ 2,158,200
$
2,924,130
Page 41
*Project added via Council amendment in 2023 Packet Pg. 203
REET I Fund 126
6.2.b
Costs inflated at 3% per year
REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Al
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Acquisition)
$
A5
Interurban Trail (Expansion/Acquisition)
$ 895,585
$ 895,585
A2
Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Acquisition)
$ 325,000
$ 325,000
A3
Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Acquisition)
$ 1,545,000
$ 1,545,000
A4
Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Acquisition)
$ 2,185,500
$ 2,185,500
Land Acquisition Services
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 300,000
(C) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures
$ 375,000
$ 1,595,000
$ 2,235,500
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 945,585
$ 5,251,085
REET I(Fund 126)Revenue
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,000
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,000
REET I (Fund 126) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 872,136
$ 697,136
$ (697,864)
$ (2,733,364)
$ (2,583,364)
$ (2,433,364)
(D) Revenue
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
(C) Expenditures
$ 375,000
$ 1,595,000
$ 2,235,500
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 945,585
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 697,136
$ (697,864)
$ (2,733,364)
$ (2,583,364)
$ (2,433,364)
$ (3,178,949)
Q
M
U
06
C
M
a
O
w
cv
u_
R
.r
.Q
to
U
rn
N
O
N
N
O
N
O
Q
a
u_
U
a
v
Y
i
O
a
It
N
O
N
Page 42
Packet Pg. 204
CEMETERY Trust Fund 137
6.2.b
Costs inflated at 3% per year
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Expenditures
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
D8
lColumbarium Expansion -Phase II
$ 159,100
$ 159,100
Repair & Maintenance
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 125,000
(C) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust(Fund 137) Expenditures
$ 25,000
$ 184,100
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 284,100
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Investment Interest (@5%)
$ 62,673
$ 65,306
$ 60,117
$ 62,623
$ 65,254
$ 68,016
$ 315,972
Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Sales Revenue
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 15,000
$ 90,000
(D) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue
$ 77,673
$ 80,306
$ 75,117
$ 77,623
$ 80,254
$ 83,016
$ 405,972
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 1,253,456
$ 1,306,129
$ 1,202,335
$ 1,252,452
$ 1,305,075
$ 1,360,328
(D)Revenue
$ 77,673
$ 80,306
$ 75,117
$ 77,623
$ 80,254
$ 83,016
(C)Expenditures
$ 25,000
$ 184,100
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
$ 25,000
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 1,306,129
$ 1,202,335
$ 1,252,452
$ 1,305,075
$ 1,360,328
$ 1,418,345
Q
M
U
06
c
ca
a
:r
cv
u_
R
.r
.Q
to
U
0)
N
0
N
N
0
N
O_
O
Q
a
u_
U
a
v
Y
i
O
a
It
N
O
N
N
C
N
E
t
0
O
r
r
Q
r.+
C
N
E
L
V
O
Page 43
Packet Pg. 205
TREE Fund 143
6.2.b
Costs inflated at 3% per year
TREE (Fund 143)Expenditures
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Park and Open Space Acquisition Program
$ 120,000
$ 120,000
Tree Maintenance - Oak Tree's 5th & Main*
$ -
(C) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Expenditures
$ 120,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 120,000
TREE (Fund 143)Revenue
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Tree - Fund 143
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 1,290,000
(D) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Revenue
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 1,290,000
TREE (Fund 143) 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(E) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 426,065
$
521,065
$ 736,065
$ 951,065
$
1,166,065
$ 1,381,065
(D) Revenue
$ 215,000
$
215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$
215,000
$ 215,000
(C) Expenditures
$ 120,000
$
-
$ -
$ -
$
-
$ -
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C)
$ 521,065
$
736,065
$ 951,065
$ 1,166,065
$
1,381,065
$ 1,596,065
*Added via Council Budget Amendment Dec. 2022
Page 44
Packet Pg. 206
6.2.b
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
PROJECTS ADDED
Type I PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
None
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
PROJECTS REMOVED
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
DESCRIPTION
Parks
Lake Ballinger Access (McAleer)
Project completion scheduled in 2023
Parks
Johnson Property Demolition
Demolition to be complete in 2023
Parks
Playground Upgrade Program
Playground upgrades identified each year, no need for additional program
Parks
lYost Park Tennis Court Re -Surface
Will be completed as part of the Public Works reservoir project
Parks
IYost Park Bridge Repairs
lCombined with Shell Creek Restoration Project
CFP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
,EVISED
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
CHANGE
Parks
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
Funded through Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - scheduled in 2025 vs. 24
Parks
Elm Street Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2027 and construction in 2028 vs. 2026
Parks
Interurban Trail Expansion
Moved to 2029 vs. 28
Parks
Johnson Property Master Plan
Removed demolition, master plan scheduled in 2026 vs. 25
Parks
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA
ILA completed in 2023; payment due upon construction completion in 2024, carryforward
Parks
Maplewood Hill Park
Playground replacement moved to 2027 vs. 25, significant price increase
Parks
Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements
permanent restroom installation scheduled to take place in 2024, carryforward
Parks
Neighborhood Park SE1, SR99, SE2
X
Master plan and construction of all three parks pushed back one year (must acquire first)
Parks
Olympic Beach Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2024 and construction in 2025 per Council Amendment
Parks
Parkland Acquisition/Neighborhood Parks
X
JAII three bumped back one year to 2024, 2025 and 2026. Funding identified for 2024.
Parks
Pine Street Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24
Parks
Seaview Park Improvements
Restroom replacement moved to 2028 vs. 27
Parks
Shell Creek Restoration
Study funding increased to $250,000 in; restoration in 2025 vs. 24 per Council Amendment
Parks
Signage and Wayfinding
Price increase to $75K vs. $51,500
Parks
IYost Park & Pool Improvements
Playground replacement moved to 2025 vs. 23, significant price increase due to topography
Page 45
Packet Pg. 207
6.2.c
Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) &
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
City Council— October 3, 2023
2
M
U
N
O
N
N
O
N
rr
Q
O
Q
C
O
ca
C
d
N
d
L
a
r✓
N
Y
L
O
ci
�
4
M
�
C
d
O_ Mo E
ltL ° M
a
E
r
Q
Packet Pg. 208
6.2.c
CIP
6-year maintenance 6-year capital
projects w/fundin projects w/
sources funding
sources
OComponents found only in the CIP
OComponents found only in the CFP
O Components found in both the CIP & CFP
CFP
Long-range (20-year)
capital project needs
Packet Pg. 209
6.2.c
Public Works & Utilities
2024-2029 CFP
Combined CFP & CIP Document
• Transportation
• Utilities
• Water
• Stormwater
• Sewer
• Facilities
• Wastewater Treatment Plant
• Comparison to previous year
3
Packet Pg. 210
6.2.c
Public Works & Utilities CFP & CIP
Citywide Project Maps
PWW-09 P'
1
PWT-a
-PWT-17
P'A'T 24
-05
IT 44
PWT p3
PWT 4G
do[
Packet Pg. 211
s.2.�
.Q
U
06
c
a
CFP & CIP Format
In
2
oject List
Capital
2024 Buc
o
Facilities
Decision Pa
et
LL
Nun
Project
Numb
nt
AmoBudunt
U
N
PROJECTD' 2024
2025
20261
128
2029
TOTAL
(2024-2029)
2030-"•
O
N
IV
N
O
N
Preservation / Maintenance Projects
a
PWT-01
Annual Street Preservation
$1,600,000 $2,400,000
$1,300,000 $2,630,000
$2.630,000
$2,630,000
$13,190,000
$39,450,000
$52,64 Q 0
Program
....
PWT-03
76th Ave. W Overlay from 196th $20,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,000
$0
$2 2 10
St. SW to Olympic View Dr.
PWT-04
Main St. Overlay from 6th Ave. to
$789,553
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$789,553
$0
=
$78 y 3
gth Ave.
m
PWT-05
Puget Dr. / OVD Signal Upgrades $0
$0
$0
$90,000
$496,000
$0
$586,000
$0
$58 N 0
Y
PWT-06
Signal Upgrades - 100ttt Ave / $0
$0
$0
$165,000
$773,000
$0
$938,000
$0
L
$93 3 0
238th St. SW
PWT-07
Main St. / 3rd Signal Upgrades $0
$0
$0
$0
$110,000
$383,000
$493,000
$0
$49 3 0
a
PWT-61
Olympic View Dr Overlay - 196th / $0 $200,000
$1,300,000
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$0
$1,50 �0
SR-524 to Talbot Rd
PWT-68
88th Ave Overlay and Sidewalk $150,000 $1,350,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,500,000
$0
$1,50 E i0
Repair
�a
Safety / Capacity Analysis
r
a
w
c
>_ 5
U
Q
Packet Pg. 212
6.2.c
Public Works & Utilities CFP & CIP
Project Sheets
Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets
Maintains the City's pavemem infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital investment to rebuild City steels.
0mgn
5350,000 SI50,000 5150.000 5130,000 5330,000 5130p00 51.950,000
mgbt of way
Conitruttpn
S1,a5a,00a 52,250,00a 51,150000 52,SOD,O(p 52,SOD,00a 52,50apW 53],500,00a
Ea►e^.e Terel
$s.Eaaa6a $ir�.aaa $tjlDApp 521-100 S2.53%111100 Sliall,.00a $39MDM
street Fund 132 -GES tat & bUti
—Fund 125
S1100,000 51150,00(1 565b" 5>50,000 S150.— 5—00a S31.250,000
0.E1t Fund L6
$400,000 $)50,000 5650,000 51.000 STS0.b00 S150,000 531.250.000
mnsportatbn �mpaa Fels
Ge— Fund
stormuvter u01Ry Fund A22
Federal Grants
state Grains
umecved FUMing
590a,00a 51.130,at10 51.13a.0aa 51.—Coa 516.950,000
foadin9 aewte Ural
S1,500,000 S2,a0o,000 $1300,000 S2530,000 S2.M.000 $2,630,OW S39,a50,OW
Parks & Recreation
Lake Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA —D19
ai"i, tr '
AA
Y
lake Ballinger Park, City of Mountlake Terrace
Project Summary: Through an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mountlake Terrace, the City of Edmonds will
support the Construction of the planned improvements in the northwest area of Lake Ballinger Park including a park
entry, pathways and access toLake Ballinger. The project is underway and payment is due upon completion of the
project.
Project luslifitution: This western boundary of the park is Edmonds dry limits and these improvements will provide
better access to Lake Ballinger Park for Edmonds residents. The revenue contribution supports me construction of the
improvements which will benefit the City of Edmonds. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and
Open Space (PROS) Plan including 3 Recommendations. 1 Goal and 3 Objectives. Recommendation 12 Expand
partnerships and agreements wah other nearby jurisdictions. Recommendation 3.6 Explore optransfor access to Lake
Ballinger with the Cn' of Mountlake Terrace to include possible joint development and Consideration of o fishing pier.
Recommendation 52 Repair and imprave or extend trails and boardwalks to allow improved public access to natural
arepsfar narure/wildlrfe viewing, hiking and outdoor experience. PROS Goal 3, Objec —3.2, 3.6 and 3.11.
Estimated Cost: $200,000
Construction 1019)—IIA 5200.000 5200,000
Total E�evn $200,000 $200.000
Real Ertate Excise Tax ll - Fund 125 5200,000 5200,000
Total Reverue $200,000 $200,000
1t
.Q
U
o�S
c
a
as
U
LL
flf
.r
Q
M
U
0)
N
O
N
N
O
N
Q
O
Q
10
Packet Pg. 213
s.2.�
2024 Public Works Comprehensive Plan Updates
Transportation & Stormwater/Surface Water
A
F E H R %PEERS
STORM AND SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT
o s COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WORK IN
City of Edmonds PROGRESS
of E�Mo�Q
City of Edmonds
Public Works Department/Engineering Division
Approved by City Council on
July 6, 2010
October 2010
Q
U
06
a
a�
LL
.Q
R
ci
N
O
N
qq
N
O
N
a
0
7
Packet Pg. 214
6.2.c
Public Works & Utilities —Transportation
2024 Pavement Preservation Projects
• 2024 Pavement Preservation Program ($1.5M)
• Construction - 6 Lane Miles
• 2025 Pavement Preservation Program ($100K)
• Design 2024; Construction 2025
• Main St. Overlay 6t" Ave — 8t" Ave ($790k)
• 2024 Construction
• $750K Federal Grant
• 11 New ADA Ramps
• 88tn Ave Overlay &Sidewalk Repair ($150K)
• Design 2024
• 76th Ave Overlay Close-out ($20k)
r•s
.Q
U
06
c
a
as
U
LL
71
M
U
N
O
N
N
O
N
rr
CL
0
a
1.1
Packet Pg. 215
6.2.c
Public Works & Utilities —Transportation
2024 Safety &Capacity Projects
• Hwy 99 Revitalization/Gateway ($114K)
• Hwy 99 Stage 3 2441"St-238t"St ($1.2M)
• Hwy 99 Stage 4 224thSt-220t"St ($1.2M)
• 76th Ave/220th St Intersection ($650K)
• SR-104 Adaptive System ($186K)
• Traffic Signal Upgrades ($30K)
� N
o
N
N
O
N
L
O
13
E
Packet Pg. 216
6.2.c
Public Works & Utilities —Transportation
2024 Active Transportation Projects & Planning
• Transportation Plan Update($236K)
• Citywide Bicycle Improvements($15K)
• Elm Way Walkway($10K)
• Traffic Calming Program($100K)
• Pedestrian Safety Program ($80K)
N
O
N
Q
O
Q
0
CO
L
a
N
Y
L
O
a
M
C
d
E
t
� V
f�
Q
LO
C
t
V
R
a�
a+
Q
Packet Pg. 217
6.2.c
Public Works & Utilities — Utilities
2024 Water Utility
• 2024 Replacement Program ($3.3M)
• Construction 2024
• 41000 ft of Watermain Replacement
• 2025 Replacement Program ($426K)
• Design 2024; Construction 2025
• Yost & Seaview Reservoir Final Design ($850K)
• $3.5M-$4M rehabilitation cost for each Reservoir
• 2025-26 Construction
• Waterline Overlays ($225K)
o..`
y
.Q
U
06
c
a
as
U
U-
M
U
N
O
N
N
O
N
rr
Q
0
a
i L1
Packet Pg. 218
6.2.c
Public Works & Utilities — Utilities
2024 Stormwater Utility
• Storm &Surface Water Comp Plan ($350K)
• Perrinville Creek Basin Projects
• Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration ($275K)
• Perrinville Creek Flow Mgmt ($100K)
• Perrinville Creek Basin Update ($594K)
• Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Impr ($90K)
• Lake Ballinger Floodplain Purchase ($120K)
• 2024 Replacement Program ($1.3M)
• Stormwater Overlays ($315K)
• 2025 Replacement Program ($324K)
am
Packet Pg. 219
6.2.c
Public Works & Utilities — Utilities
2024 Sewer Utility
• 2024 Replacement Program($2.01VI)
• 800 ft of Sewerline Replacement
• 2025 Replacement Program($363K)
• Cured in -place pipe rehabilitation ($522K)
• 41000 ft of sewer CIPP rehab
• Sewerline Overlays($60K)
2024 WWTP
• WWTP Annual Capital Replace ment($500K)
• Carbon Recovery Project($500K)
• Nutrient Removal Project($350K)
• Gasification Bypass($300K)
• Condition Assessment ($150K)
• Variable Frequency Drives(VFD) Upgrades ($250K)
• Primary Clarifier 2 Rehabilitation ($600K)
- 7-
.Q
U
ojS
c
a.
as
U
LL
M
U
N
O
N
N
O
N
CL
0
a
13
Packet Pg. 220
s.2.�
Public Works & Utilities — Facilities
• Boys & Girls Club
• Cemetery Building
• Historic Museum
• Library
• City Hall • Meadowdale Club House
• Fishing Pier • Old Public Works
• Frances Anderson Center • Parks Maintenance Bldg
• Fire Station 16
• Fire Station 17
• Fire Station 20
• Historic Log Cabin
• Public Safety
• Public Works O&M
• Wade James Theater
• Yost Pool House
.Q
U
06
c
a
go
N
14
Packet Pg. 221
6.2.c
-ured Funding $862,240 4%
bond $585,000 3%
)ortation Impact Fees $423,361 2%
112 $251,570 1.1%
=unds $114,000 0.5%
General Fund
0.4% City of Lynnwood
Other
Packet Pg. 222
6.2.c
Q
U
06
c
'_,550 4% a
General Fund
Fund112
Other 0.3% ARPA
City of Lynnwood a
i Other
N
O
N
Facilities 016 bond/non-bond $2,013,645 0.7% o
N
rr
Q
Transportation Impact Fees $1,923,065 1% a
Packet Pg. 223
6.2.c
CIP/CFP Schedule
July
• City staff begins development of capital budgets
August
• Submit proposed Capital budget to Finance
• Prepare draft CFP and CIP
September
• Joint Presentation City Council/Planning Board (September 19tn)
• Planning Board Public Hearing (September 27tn)
October
• City Council Public Hearing (October 3rd)
• Planning Board Recommendations/Approval (October 11tn)
• City Council Discussion (October 17th)
• City Council Discussion/Approval (October 24tn)
\• -Ia•-I
• Adopt CFP w/ Budget into the Comprehensive Plan (November 21st)
Q
U
ojS
c
a
as
U
U-
.Q
M
U
N
O
N
N
O
N
CL
0
a
17
Packet Pg. 224
6.2.c
Questions
Q
Packet Pg. 225
6.2.d
Parks, Recreation & Human Services
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP
Angie Feser, Director
September 27, 2023
Packet Pg. 226
6.2.d
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP Overview
Framework for CIP/CFP
Current/Ongoing Projects
Capital Projects — 2024 Highlighted
Projects
Programs
Acquisition
Changes
Packet Pg. 227
6.2.d
2024-2029 Parks CIP / CFP- FRAMEWORK
Department Staff Resources
PROS Plan Capital Recommendations
1. Acquisition to Fill Park System Gaps - Secure additional land for neighborhood parks to
address gaps
2. Open Space & Conservation Acquisitions - Pursue acquisitions that adjoin city properties or
conserve unique natural areas
3. Park Development & Enhancements — significant repairs needed for aging infrastructure
4. Yost Pool Replacement - Refine options for the replacement of Yost Pool
5. Trail Connections — Needed to help link destinations across the community
6. ADA, Accessibility & Other User Convenience Enhancements - Remove barriers and improve
universal access
Packet Pg. 228
6.2.d
2024-2029 Parks CIP / CFP - FRAMEWORK
PROS Plan Goals (9)
1. ENGAGEMENT - Encourage and facilitate meaningful public involvement in park and recreation
planning.
2. DIVERSITY, EQUITY & INCLUSION - Decrease barriers and provide increased opportunities for
participation and representative cultural, heritage and art programs, events representing the diversity
of Edmonds demographics.
3. PARKS, TRAILS & OPEN SPACE - Provide an interconnected park system that offers a wide variety of
year-round recreation opportunities and experiences which support and enhance Edmonds' cultural
identity and the natural environment.
4. WATERFRONT USE & ACCESS - Preserve and pursue opportunities to expand public access and
enjoyment of Edmonds' waterfront.
5. NATURAL RESOURCE & HABITAT CONSERVATION - Conserve and provide access to natural resource
lands for habitat conservation, recreation, and environmental education.
Packet Pg. 229
6.2.d
2024-2029 Parks CIP / CFP FRAMEWORK
PROS Plan Goals (Cont.)
6. CLIMATE CHANGE, ADAPTATION & RESILIENCY -Adopt to climate change and increase local park
system resiliency by improving environmental conditions, stewardship and sustainability in parks, trails,
open spaces and recreation facilities within planning, development, maintenance, and operations.
7. RECREATION PROGRAMS & FACILITIES -Provide a varied and inclusive suite of recreation opportunities
and experiences to promote health and wellness, year-round activity and social engagement.
8. CULTURAL SERVICES -Provide arts and cultural opportunities and experiences to promote an engaged
and vibrant community.
9. PARK OPERATIONS & ADMINISTRATION - Maintain and operate a modern, efficient park system that
provides a high level of user comfort, safety and aesthetic quality, and protects capital investments.
PROS Plan
G2—Obj2.6
G3—Obj3.8,3.10,3.11
G7— Obi 7.2
Rec. — 1.2, 6.2
Packet Pg. 230
6.2.d
2024 - 2029 Parks CIP / UP Geographic Distribution
Ps
Johnson Property
R3
Meadowdale Playllelds
D6
Mathay Ballinger Park
119,114 R6, RIl
Yost Park & Pool
D19
lake Ballinger Park (Min
DS
[alumharium Expansion - Phase ll
R7
Olym plc Beach Park
DSD, D11, D32
Pine street Park
RB
stets Park
PI, D14
WMertron[ Walkway
R12
Maplewood Hill Park
P4, D9, DI
Edmonds Marsh Restoration
D36, D17, RI4
Elm street Park
PI, D2
Parks M.1—nonce Building
R16
Seavlew Park
R35
Pool Replacement
Al
Edmonds Marsh Restoration
AS
Interurban Troll
R19
Shell Creek Restoration
D20
Woodwey Campus Athletic
Complex
14,"te specHic projects
A2, P2, D23
Nelghborhoad Park SEI
A3, P6, Dls
Neighborhood Park SR99
A4, P7, DSa
Neighborhood Park sE 2
R27
Cltywlde Park Improvements
RIO
Signege B WWfinding
P4
•D1
D9
F,
A2, P2, D13
7
A3,P6,D15
A4, P7, D18
R16
R17
��
R10
VP
* Non -site specific projects
Neighborhood Park SE 1
Neighborhood Park SR99
Neighborhood Park SE 2
Citywide Park Improvements
Signage & Wayfinding
R4
RB
R11 R19
R[S • 7
R14
�R6
010 •
D12 ;' 2024 Projects
•
•D17
:8
L,-/ I?19 2025 - 2029 Projects
• D6
• \
ns
Site specific projects only.
Citywide/annual citywide projects not drown.
A of EDAf
/1C. 1890
Q
M
U
015
a
a)
LL
Q
M
U
N
O
N
N
0
N
Q
O
a
Packet Pg. 231
6.2.d
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - FORMAT
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site& Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD*
D19
Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III
$ 200,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 200,000
Development. Payment due upon completion of project.
DS
Mathay Ballinger Park *CARRYFORWARD*
D6
Construction of improvements including permanent restroom, paved trail, picnic
$ 271,300
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 271,300
D7
shelter ADA access and other amenities.
Shell Creek Restoration *CARRYFORWARD*
R19
Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based
$ 120,000
$ 380,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 500,000
on study. Study in 2024, work in 2025.
R9
Yost Park & Pool
R4
Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include resurface of tennis courts
$ 154,300
$ 1,296,400
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,450,700
R6
and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs/replacement in 2024, inclusive
R11
iplaVground and pool upgrades in 2025.
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
D8
Expansion ofthe current colum barium. Funding provided throughthe Cemetery
$ -
$ 159,100
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 159,100
Trust Fund 137.
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting
X
D20
In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park
$ _
$ 1,500,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,500,000
and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and
future construction of two additional fields.
Neighborhood Park SE 1
X
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds
$ -
$ 79,600
$ 819,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 899,100
D13
(funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
Sierra Park
R8
$ _
$ -
$ 415,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 415,000
Playground replacement and upgradeto inclusive standards.
R7
Olympic Beach Park
$
$ 20,000
$ 33,000
$
$
$
$ 53,000
Renovation of existing restrooms.
Packet Pg. 232
6.2.d
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP Funding Overview
PARKS CIP REVENUE
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
$ 1,200,000
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125
$ 2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 9,500,000
Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 300,000
$ 1,800,000
Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 215,000
$ 1,290,000
Cemetery Trust Fund 137-ColumbariumExpansion
$ 159,100
$ 159,100
ARPA Contribution - Shell Creek Study
$ 120,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 120,000
Investment Interest (3%)
$ 18,918
$ 24,795
$ 30,849
$ 37,085
$ 43,507
$ 50,122
$ 205,277
Donations
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Bond Proceeds
$
$
$ -
$
$
$
$
Secured Grants
$
$
$ -
$
$
$
$
L(E)TOTAL
Unsecured Grants/Funding- non -land acquisition
$
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,945,000
$ 5,481,200
$ 869,500
$ 24,756,800
$ 34,552,500
PARKS CIP REVENUE
$ 2,853,918
$ 3,898,895
$ 4,190,849
$ 7,733,285
$ 3,128,007
$ 27,021,922
$ 48,826,877
Parks Fund 6-Year Overview
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
(F) Beginning Fund Balance
$ 3,150,795
$ 3,061,113
$ 1,316,908
$ 17,857
$ 1,214,742
$ 1,817,349
(E) Revenue
$ 2,853,918
$ 3,898,895
$ 4,190,849
$ 7,733,285
$ 3,128,007
$ 27,021,922
(D) Expenditures
$ 2,943,600
$ 5,643,100
$ 5,489,900
$ 6,536,400
$ 2,525,400
$ 26,559,455
(G) Ending Fund Balance (F+E-D)
$ 3,061,113
$ 1,316,908
$ 17,857
$ 1,214,742
$ 1,817,349
$ 2,279,817
Packet Pg. 233
6.2.d
Current/Ongoing Capital Projects
.Q
U
06
m
a
a�
)emolition Q
m
U
:s (2023-2024) N
N
O
N
r
Q
O
a
Packet Pg. 234
6.2.d
Current/Ongoing Capital Projects
,
Q
M
U
06
M
a
W
A)
Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA M
LL
Parkland Acquisition Program M
U
rn
N
Deferred Maintenance/Small Capital Projects N
BLN Shower replacement N
Cemetery Gate repair o
Mathay Ballinger Apollo Swing replacem( a
Park Restroom Doors (12) — automatic Ic c >
Viewer repairs
OUTS I OR INSIDE IN9DE OUTSIDE
In
T
21/a In. ■ ht m� i
-43I6In_� Y4 �2Y18 F.ti
■
1
Packet Pg. 235
6.2.d
Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP
PROJECTS
Highlight — 2024 projects
IL
In
L
a
E
s
Ot EQ41 10
i 04 �+
��a•. I Kai- C�,1
Q
Packet Pg. 236
6.2.d
CL
.. . U,
c
Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA- D19 DP y
M
U-
I
Boardwalk & Viewing Platform
Lake Ballinger
1=
O
• Interlocal agreement to support development
PROS Plan
of phase 3 which includes improved access for
G3—Obj. 3.2, 3.8, 3.11
i
G5 — Obj 5.2
Edmonds residents
Rec.- 3.6
Y
• Estimated Cost $200,000
a
E
t
V
t of Eb4f04
+�O+
r.i
C
cd
G
r.+
Packet Pg. 237
6.2.d
Mathay Ballinger Park —D6 (CarryforwardlDP)
• ADA parking and paved pathway
• Shelter with Picnic Tables
• Permanent Restroom
• Estimated Total Cost: $499,300
a
PROS Plan
G2— Obj 2.6
G3 — Obj 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.8, 3.9
G9 — Obj 9.1
Rec.— 3.1,3.3,3.5, 6.2, 6.4
A of EDAf
/Ic. 1890
Packet Pg. 238
6.2.d
Shell Creek Restoration- x19 (Carryforward)
Construction (1119) — Creek Restoration
$120,000
$380,000
i
$500,(
Total Expenses
$120,000
$380,000
$500,(
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$380,000
$380,(
ARPA Funding Transfer
$120,000
$120,(
Total Revenue
Funding M��Mffw
$120,000
$380,000
$500,Unsecured
• Study to determine scope & obtain permits - 2024
• Restorative work - 2025
• Estimated Cost $500,000
PROS Plan
G3 - Obj 3.7, 3.8, 3.9
G4 - Obj 4.2, 4.4
G5 - Obj 5. 1, 5.3, 5.4
G6 - Obj 6.5
G9 - Obj 9.1, 9.2
sa.,
M
U
c
a
A)
LL
Q
M
U
rn
N
O
N
N
O
N
Q
O
13
a
Packet Pg. 239
6.2.d
Yost Park &Pool - R9, R41 R6, R11 (DP)
Construction (R4)—Trail/Bridge Repair
,.
$80,000
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
$8
Construction (R6)—Playground Replacement
$750,000
$75i
Construction (R9)—Tennis Court Resurface
$74,300
$7
Construction (R11) — Pool Upgrades
$546,400
$54
Total Expenses
$154,300
$1,296,400
$1,45,
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$154,300
$1,296,400
$1,45
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding
$154,300
$0
$1,296,400
i
$1,45,
• Trail / Bridge Repair— 2024
• Tennis Court Resurface — 2024
• Playground Replacement - 2025
• Pool Upgrades — 2025
• Estimated Cost: $1,450,700
PROS Plan
G1 — Obj 1.1, 1.4
G3 — Obj 3.6, 3.8, 3.9
G4 — Obj. 4.4
G5— Obj 5.4
G6 — Obj 6.5
G9 — Obj. 9.1
Rec.— 3.1,3.4,3.10
Rec. — 6.2
Q.,
M
U
c
a
U_
Q
M
U
N
O
N
4
N
O
N
r
Q
O
a
Packet Pg. 240
6.2.d
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - PROJECTS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD*
D19
Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III
$ 200,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 200,000
Development. Payment due upon completion of project.
DS
Mathay Ballinger Park *CARRYFORWARD*
D6
Construction of improvements including permanent restroom, paved trail, picnic
$ 271,300
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 271,300
D7
shelter ADA access and other amenities.
Shell Creek Restoration *CARRYFORWARD*
R19
Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based
$ 120,000
$ 380,000
$ -
S -
$ -
$ -
$ 500,000
on study. Study in 2024, work in 2025.
R9
Yost Park & Pool
R4
Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include resurface of tennis courts
$ 154,300
$ 1,296,400
$ -
5 -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,450,700
R6
and trail, bridge and boardwalk repairs/replacement in 2024, inclusive
R11
iplaVground and pool upgrades in 2025.
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
D8
Expansion ofthe current colum barium. Funding provided throughthe Cemetery
$ -
$ 159,100
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 159,100
Trust Fund 137.
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting
X
D20
In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park
$ _
$ 1,500,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,500,000
and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and
future construction of two additional fields.
Neighborh nod Park SE 1
X
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in South Edmonds
$ -
$ 79,600
$ 819,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 899,100
D13
(funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
Sierra Park
R8
$ _
$ -
$ 415,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 415,000
Playground replacement and upgradeto inclusive standards.
R7
Olympic Beach Park
$
$ 20,000
$ 33,000
$
$
$
$ 53,000
Renovation of existing restrooms.
Packet Pg. 241
6.2.d
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - PROJECTS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
D10
Pine Street Park
D11
Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables,
$ -
$ 40,000
$ 124,400
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 164,400
D12
canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway.
Johnson Property
R2
Master plan forfuture park use. Site development not included in estimate.
$ -
$ -
$ 82,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 82,000
PS
Demolition, debris removal and site security completed in 2023.
Neighborhood Park SR99
•
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$ -
$ -
$ 82,000
$ 844,100
$ -
$ -
$ 926,100
D15
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
X
P1
Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building
$ _
$ -
$ 1,125,500
$ 4,637,100
$ -
$ -
$ 5,762,600
D2
Replace and/or renovate shop facilities located in City Park.
R12
Maplewood Hill Park
$ _
$ _
$ -
$ 347,800
$ -
$ -
$ 347,800
Playground replacement.
Neighborhood Park SE 2
X
D18
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 84,400
$ 869,500
$ -
$ 953,900
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
Waterfront Walkway
P3
Connectingthe waterfront walkwayfrom Brackett's Landing North to
$
$
$
$ 515,000
$ 819,500
$ 1,334,500
D14
Marina Beach Park by adding missing section in front of the Ebb Tide
-
_
_
S _
Condominiums, to provide ADA improvements.
R16
Seaview Park
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ 417,900
$ -
$ 417,900
Replacement of permanent restroom to provide ADA upgrades.
D16
Elm Street Park
D17
Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground,
$ -
$ -
$ -
S -
$ 100,000
$ 340,370
$ 440,370
R14
small shelter with picnic tables and habitat restoration.
Packet Pg. 242
6.2.d
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP - PROJECTS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
X
R15
Pool Replacement
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ _
$ -
$ 23,881,000
$ 23,881,000
Replacement of the existing Yost pool. Design, location, and funding TBD.
Meadowdale Playfields
R3
Renovations as suggested by the City of Lynnwood and consistent with re-
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$
negotiated and updated Interlocal Agreement. May include addition of dugout
-
roofs, light replacement and playground upgrade.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
Master Plan development and implementation of the Edmonds Marsh to daylight
P4
the waterway connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and twofresh
X
D9
water creeks providing restoration of freshwater/salt water estuary and natural
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
$ -
D1
tidal exchange. (All expenses are TBD per Council direction in December 2022).
Acquisition funding identified in Parkland Acquisition program.
(A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS
1 $ 745,600
$ 3,475,100
$ 2,6874 00
$ 5,913,400
$ 1,902,40
$ 25,0 00,870
$ 33,070,070
Packet Pg. 243
6.2.d
Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP
PROGRAMS
Highlight — 2024 projects
IL
In
L
a
E
s
Ot EQ4, 10
E
��a•. I Kai- V
Q
Packet Pg. 244
6.2.d
Signage & Wayfinding - R10 (DP)
0
r
Trail identification, orientation markers, safety & regulatory messagin
park hours, park rules and etiquette, interpretive information and
warning signs. a
Estimated Cost: $75,000
PROS Plan Y
G2 — Obj. 2.1, 2.3 a
G3 — Obi. 3.6 y
G5 — Obi. 5.3, 5.4
G9 — Obi. 9.1 t
b
Rec. — 6.2, 6.5
w°
y +r
11"c�1191 V
O
Q
Packet Pg. 245
6.2.d
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP - PROGRAMS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project (4) Programs
PARKS CIP PROGRAMS 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total
R17
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular and deferred maintenance,
repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment.
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 2,700,000
signage m waynnamg
R10 Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a
consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system.
Parkland Acquisition Support
Funds utilized to evaluate potential acquisitions and complete due diligence.
Debt Service and Interfund Transfers
Debt service on Civic Park $1.61M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to
Engineering for Capital Project Support.
I SUBTOTAL- PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
$ 75,000 $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ 75,000
5 50,000 $ 50,000 5 50,000 5 .50,000 $ 50,000 5 50,000 $ 300,000
$ 123,000 j $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 1 $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 j $ 123,000 1 $ 738,000
.Q
U
015
a
A)
i�
LL
R
r
.Q
M
U
N
O
N
r
N
O
N
r
Q
O
a
Packet Pg. 246
6.2.d
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / UP - PROGRAMS
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
�
PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
R17
Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular and deferred maintenance,
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 450,000
$ 2,700,000
repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment.
Signage & Wayfinding
R10
Replacement of aging signage to improve accuracy and provide a
$ 75,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 75,000
consistent City of Edmonds Parks visual identification system.
Parkland Acquisition Support
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 300,000
Funds utilized to evaluate potential acquisitions and complete due diligence.
Debt Service and Interfund Transfers
Debt service on Civic Park $1.61M bond (2021) and Interfund transfers to
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 123,000
$ 738,000
Engineering for Capital Project Support.
(B)SUBTOTAL- PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
$ 698,000
$ 623,000
$ 623,000
$ 623,000
$ 6237000
$ 623,000
$ 3,813,000
(4) Programs
Packet Pg. 247
6.2.d
Parks, Recreation and Human Services
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP
PARKLAND ACQUISITIONS
Highlight — 2024 project
0
w
L
E
s
Ot E041 10
i 04 �+
lid,
Inc. I Sad- Csi
Q
Packet Pg. 248
6.2.d
Parkland Acquisition - a2, A3, A4 (No DP -Council Authorization)
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (A2)
$1,500,000
Acquisition —Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3)
Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4)
Total Expenses
$1,500,000
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126
$1,300,000
Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD
Total Revenue
$1,300,000
• Neighborhood Parks SE1
• Acquisition as Feasible
• Estimated Cost: $1,500,00
pant pin.,
G2 — Obj. 2.1
G3 — Obi. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3A
Rec. —1.1
sa.,
M
U
c
a
u_
.Q
M
U
rn
N
O
N
N
O
N
r
Q
O
M
a
Packet Pg. 249
6.2.d
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project
tf
PARKLAND ACQUISITION
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Total
X
A2
Neighborhood Park SE 1
$ 1,500,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,500,000
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
X
A3
Neighborhood Park SR99
$ -
$ 1,545,000
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,545,000
Acquisition of parkland near SR 99.
X
A4
Neighborhood Park SE 2
$ -
$ -
$ 2,185,500
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,185,500
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds.
AS
Interurban Trail
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 895,585
$ 895,585
Acquisition for trail extension.
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
X
Al
Acquisition ofthe Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh
TBD
TED
TED
TED
TED
TED
$ -
restoration.
(C)SUBTOTAL- PARKLAND ACQUISITION
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,545,000
$ 2,185,500
$
$
$ 895,585
$ 6,126,085
Packet Pg. 250
6.2.d
Changes to CIP/CFP
UP 1 CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
PROJECTS ADDED
Type PROJECT NAME CFP r DESCRIPTION
None
UP / CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
PROJECTS REMOVED
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
I DESCRIPTION
Parks
Lake Ballinger Access (McAleer)
Project completion scheduled in 2023
Parks
Johnson Property Demolition
Demolition to be complete in 2023
Parks
Playground Upgrade Program
IPlayground upgrades identified each year, no need for additional program
UP 1 CIP COMPARISON (2024 TO 2029)
Type
PROJECT NAME
CFP
CHANGE
Parks
Columbarium Expansion - Phase II
Funded through Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - scheduled in 2025 vs. 24
Parks
Elm Street Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2027 and construction in 2028 vs. 2026
Parks
Interurban Trail Expansion
Moved to 2029 vs. 28
Parks
Johnson Property Master Plan
Removed demolition, master plan scheduled in 2026 vs. 25
Parks
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA
ILA completed in 2023; payment due upon construction completion in 2024, carryforward
Parks
Maplewood Hill Park
Playground replacement moved to 2027 vs. 25, significant price increase
Parks
Mathay Ballinger Park Improvements
permanent restroom installation scheduled to take place in 2024, carr forward
Parks
Neighborhood Park SE1, SR99, SE2
X
Master plan and construction of all three parks pushed back one year must acquire first
Parks
Olympic Beach Park Improvements
Se arated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24
Parks
Parkland Acquisition/Neighborhood Parks
X
All three bumped back one year to 2024, 2025 and 2026
Parks
Pine Street Park Improvements
Separated into planning in 2025 and construction in 2026 vs. 24
Parks
Seaview Park Improvements
Restroom replacement moved to 2028 vs. 27
Parks
Shell Creek Restoration
IPlayground
Plan carried forward to 2024, restoration in 2025 vs. 24
Parks
Si na e and Wayfinding
Price increase to $75K vs. $51,500
Parks
Yost Park & Pool Improvements
replacement moved to 2025 vs. 23, significant price increase due to topography
F E
Packet Pg. 251
6.2.d
Questi,
ons?
rr
Q
Packet Pg. 252
6.2.d
Parks, Recreation & Human Services
Parks 2024-2029 CIP / CFP
Angie Feser, Director
October 3, 2023
Packet Pg. 253
6.2.e
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of Hybrid Meeting
September 27, 2023
Chair Gladstone called the hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. at Edmonds
City Hall and on Zoom.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
The Land Acknowledgement was read by Board Member Maxwell.
Board Members Present Staff Present
Judi Gladstone, Chair Mike Clugston, Senior Planner
Lauren Golembiewski Rob English, City Engineer
Richard Kuehn (online) Mike De Lilla, Senior Utilities Engineer
Susanna Martini Angie Feser, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Director
Nick Maxwell Shannon Burley, Parks, Recreation, & Human Services Deputy Director
Jeremy Mitchell
Beth Tragus-Campbell, Vice Chair
Board Members Absent
Emily Nutsch (alternate)
Lily Distelhorst (student) - excused
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
MARTINI, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 13.
MOTION MADE BY CHAIR GLADSTONE, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
GOLEMBIEWSKI, TO APPROVE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS.
• On page 3 of 9 of the minutes, in the second full paragraph, the second sentence should be
corrected to: Replacement trees wem could be triggered when the property owner has the last
two or three trees on the property.
• Page 3 of 9, the fourth full paragraph, delete the third sentence starting with, "Chair Gladstone.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENTS.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS AMENDED.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 1 of 7
Packet Pg. 254
6.2.e
THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Sue Oskowski, Edmonds resident, asked why the sidewalk on 84th (from 238 h to 234th) in the Public Works
planned schedule for 2027. When Public Works presented their transportation plan to the City Council in June
of this year the sidewalk was scheduled to be built in 2024. Her neighbor drives an electric wheelchair in the
road because there are no sidewalks on 84t'. She urged the City to put that section of the sidewalk in the plan
for 2024. It is definitely needed now.
Teresa Hollis, Edmonds resident, had the following comments for Public Works:
1. She stated that this plan uses priorities for walkways that were set in 2015 which is before the City
Council decided to put almost all of the new housing growth in the Highway 99 subarea. This CFP
mostly ignores the planning decisions that were made by the City Council about where future density
would be. She requested that in future cycles staff pays attention to where the housing density is planned.
2. She referred to the EIS for the Highway 99 subarea plan which says to build flexibility into each cycle
of the 6-year Transportation Improvement Program to modify the priority and the funding of capital
projects serving the study area as new development occurs and creates opportunities for matching funds
from private development. A building permit was issued for the Apollo apartments at 236t` and
Highway 99. It's waiting for the developer to pick it up and pay the big fees. So where are the city
infrastructure projects for that neighborhood?
3. She said she doesn't support the amount of spending in the Green Streets demonstration project. A
Green Street is a Tesla, but they would be happy with a used Prius. She suggested the City just provide
some sort of walkway so they don't have to walk in the street, especially when they walk their kids to
school. Also, please add a project for a paved walkway on 236 h between 84th and Edmonds Way since
that's a route to Madrona School. It would also support the neighborhood where development will
eventually happen on the empty lot at 236th and 84th.
4. She expressed support for the big increase in traffic calming programs for 2024.
She had the following comments for Parks:
1. She supports the emphasis on working down the maintenance and repair backlog.
2. She expressed concern that the Burlington Coat Factory site project is missing from the portfolio. She
wondered why there wasn't at least a placeholder for it in this CFP cycle for some reasonable estimate
of the city spending.
Angela Winzen, Mayor's Climate Protection Committee member and Edmonds Climate Advisory Board
member, commented on behalf of both of the groups to convey their shared desire for a climate action manager
to be part of the City's new budget. Climate mitigation is not a task that should be on a list of many others. It
deserves, at minimum, a dedicated individual who can take the lead on implementation of the 2023 Climate
Action Plan and the writing of future plans, including adaptation plans and all business related to climate
mitigation in the City of Edmonds. Edmonds needs a leader in the city office who is able to focus their efforts
entirely on the goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. They cannot wait another 13 years to begin when
they are already years behind. A climate action manager for this city is long overdue and needs to be part of the
new budget.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 2 of 7
Packet Pg. 255
6.2.e
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Public Hearing
City Engineer Rob English introduced staff members and explained the difference between the CFP and the
CIP and how they have been combined into one document. He highlighted the project lists and explained the
way they are prioritized and organized. He also reviewed the layout of the project sheets. He explained that the
Transportation Plan Update will be coordinated with the Comprehensive Plan Update. The Storm and Surface
Water Management Comprehensive Plan is just beginning an update.
Chair Gladstone asked for confirmation that the priorities established in the CIP are based on the 2015 Plan.
Mr. English confirmed that is true.
Mr. English reviewed Pavement Preservation Projects, Safety and Capacity Projects, Active Transportation
Projects and Planning, Water Utility Projects, and Stormwater Projects. There was discussion about waterline
overlays and patches. Staff explained the importance of coordinating between departments to determine the
prioritization of projects. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell asked if the City is on track for water utility replacement.
Mr. English replied that they are. The utility rate analysis currently underway will reassess the utility rates that
are needed to maintain the city's infrastructure.
Mr. English continued to review 2024 projects and programs including the Stormwater Utility, Sewer Utility
Projects, Wastewater Treatment Plant, and Facilities.
Comments/Questions:
Board Member Golembiewski asked how coordination happens with other agencies if it is a road that has other
ownership. Mr. English explained it depends on the project and gave some examples. Sometimes there are joint
projects where jurisdictions share costs. Highway 99 is a state route. The state's responsibility on a state route
is the pavement condition. The local agencies are responsible for any improvements. Sometimes there are state
dollars available for this too.
Board Member Mitchell asked if the estimated project cost is an engineer's ROM (rough order of magnitude)
type estimate from a cost consultant. Mr. English replied that it is. When the Comprehensive Plan updates are
done there is typically a high-level engineer's estimate attached to each project. Board Member Mitchell asked
how many projects end up with leftover contingency funds and what happens with leftover funds. Mr. English
said it depends on the scope of the project. Mr. English explained that complex projects tend to use more of the
contingency funds, while the pavement preservation program rarely touches the contingency fund. If it is a local
funding source like REET, the money gets put back into the fund and is part of the balance available for
subsequent year projects.
Board Member Golembiewski asked how private development influences prioritization of projects, particularly
transportation and sidewalk projects. For example, there could be an area where they want to encourage
development and the City takes the lead in doing some frontage work or an area that has some developable,
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 3 of 7
Packet Pg. 256
6.2.e
attractive land where they want the developer to do some of those sidewalk projects. Does that lead into the
City's decision making and prioritization? Mr. English affirmed that it can. He referred to Highway 99 as an
example of a high priority investment area by the current administration. On that corridor, projects will be done
to beautify the corridor as well as subsequent frontage improvements that would typically be required by a
developer. These improvements save costs for the developers and help to spur redevelopment.
Chair Gladstone noted that the CIP is based on the 2015 Transportation Plan and asked how the prioritization
of the CIP is impacted by the passage of the subarea plan. Was that evaluated and incorporated at all? Mr.
English noted they will have an opportunity to do that with the current update. At the planning level, they go
through the Transportation Plan each six years, and this is the big effort to look at overall planning and tie that
into the Comprehensive Plan. Chair Gladstone asked if the Transportation Plan will come to the Planning Board.
Mr. English replied that it would. Chair Gladstone said it didn't seem like there were really any new sidewalks
before 2027. Why is that? Mr. English said there is no funding. The first three years are projects that have
secured money or are reasonably expected to have secured money. There is no dedicated funding for sidewalks.
Chair Gladstone asked what the replacement rate is for replacing the utility system with the dollar amounts that
are in the budget for replacement. Mr. De Lilla replied it would be about 100 years. Mr. English commented
that for transportation, at a rate of $2.8 million per year they could repave the streets in 25 to 30 years. The City
is only currently funding about half that amount. He explained that traffic impact fees are restricted to growth
related projects that address level of service. With this update they will be changing the way they do impact fees
by looking at a multimodal level of service. Part of that will be looking at sidewalks and bike lanes in an effort
to have a more holistic complete street approach.
Board Member Mitchell referred to areas that don't have sidewalks and asked about the possibility of taking
away some of the right-of-way that the City owns to incorporate some pedestrian right of way. Mr. English
noted that a local impact district would be one way to fund a sidewalk on a local street if all the neighbors agreed
to it. Board Member Mitchell explained that the City of Shoreline sometimes will put in temporary delineator
curbs into the right of way. This is a way to provide a community that doesn't have any sidewalks with a
designated area while funding for sidewalks is being generated. Mr. English said they don't have any active
programs like this. They are already $1.3 million short on paving, so to pave something like that takes them
further away from preservation efforts. He noted that there have been occasions where they have a wider
shoulder and have striped it in a way so that pedestrians could walk there. However, they don't have an active
program where they go look for wider shoulders to make a temporary path. Chair Gladstone asked if this could
potentially be a temporary solution for the area on 236' brought up by a resident today that had no place for
school kids to walk, not even a shoulder. Mr. English expressed concern that it could trigger stormwater
requirements related to detention and water quality. They typically look for opportunities where there is existing
pavement to maintain what they have so they don't have the stormwater triggers. Director Feser suggested that
some of these ideas might be able to be addressed with the new Transportation Improvement Plan's multimodal
transportation focus. Mr. England concurred.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell referred to packet page 154 and stated that they need to figure out how to prevent
the massive block of sidewalk projects continuing to be pushed out because of lack of funding. She asked why
parks restrooms maintenance funding had been removed. Director Feser stated that might just be a facilities
budget issue. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell asked staff to provide clarification on that. Director Feser noted that
there is a $450,000 program for projects like that. They are still doing the restroom projects; it just isn't under
the facilities budget.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 4 of 7
Packet Pg. 257
6.2.e
Director Feser presented the Parks, Recreation, and Human Services 2024-2029 CIP/CFP. She introduced
Deputy Director Shannon Burley and expressed appreciation for the large role she plays in the budget process.
She also thanked Public Works and Rob English for working with them. She presented the framework for the
CIP/CFP; current and ongoing projects; capital projects (2024 highlighted projects, programs, and acquisitions);
and a summary of changes in the program from last year's capital program.
Public Testimony: None
Questions/Comments:
Board Member Martini referred to signage and wayfinding and encouraged the City to include accessibility
Director Feser concurred and stated they intend to do that.
Board Member Golembiewski asked if Parks is responsible for the maintenance of all street trees. Director Feser
replied that they are, and it is a challenge. They need to do an inventory of all trees so they know what they have
and how they are working with it.
Chair Gladstone referred to parkland acquisition and asked what the minimum size is for a neighborhood park.
Director Feser replied that there is no minimum or maximum; it is more about the location and what it provides.
Board Member Martini referred to the waterfront walkway and asked if the apartments agreed with the City to
finally put in an accessible walkway. Director Feser explained they had not, but the courts said yes.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell referred to the ADA restroom upgrade at Seaview Park and asked if they could
use REET funding for that one since they are increasing access. Director Feser said they could use REET
funding, but that doesn't have to do with increasing access. She didn't think they could use park impact fees
because it isn't about increasing capacity. Board Member Martini argued that it would increase capacity for her.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell encouraged staff to move this project up earlier with the justification that they
can't fully utilize the existing structure they have built and paid for because it doesn't have an ADA restroom.
Director Feser asked for suggestions about what in exchange could get pushed back. Vice Chair Tragus-
Campbell suggested pushing back the Maplewood Hill Park playground replacement one year because then
you are swapping playground for playground and increasing access to the playground you have. Board Member
Golembiewski pointed out that Sierra Park desperately needs to be replaced. As far as neighborhood concerns,
Seaview has access to Seaview Park so they aren't lacking a park space. This could be another potential swap.
Chair Gladstone asked if there are any concerns about recommending the CIP for approval to the Council. She
stated that the Council needs to understand that the way that this CIP is set up perpetuates the inequities in the
city. She appreciates the philosophy that the priority is that they need to maintain what they have before they
put new things in, but if the Council wants to walk the walk about leveling the playing field here, there is some
real hard thinking they need to do. She understands that there are funding issues, but how you direct your REET
dollars is somewhat discretionary. She is unhappy that they are not seeing any new sidewalks until 2027 when
they have kids walking down a street where there is no place to walk. There are people using wheelchairs on an
arterial that is becoming busier by the day, and it is not being addressed. That overall philosophy flies in the
face what Council has been talking about in terms of trying to address some of the inequities in the City.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 5 of 7
Packet Pg. 258
6.2.e
Board Member Golembiewski asked if there is a breakdown of the amount of money being spent on
maintenance of existing facilities versus money towards new facilities each year. She also commented that it
appears that a large chunk of the improvement funds toward new items are being dedicated towards the
Highway 99 revitalization stages 3 and 4, and that maybe some of the smaller neighborhood sidewalks and
streets are getting pushed out further to prioritize this area. She acknowledged that Highway 99 is underserved
so they are putting funds there, but maybe those aren't the streets that the community is actually wanting to
improve. Maybe the issue with prioritization isn't necessarily between maintenance of existing and
development of new. In 2024 and 2025 it appears that most of the capital facilities budget is going toward
Highway 99. Maybe if some of those funds were diverted towards areas like 84" or 236th off the main arterial,
you would have more support. Chair Gladstone said in her mind it isn't an "either/or" issue; it's probably an
"and".
Mr. English noted that the majority of the funding for Highway 99 is grant funding so they can't move it to local
streets. He acknowledged that it is a complex issue. Board Member Golembiewski agreed and spoke to the
importance of communicating that sort of thing well. The neighborhoods around there don't understand these
issues. Chair Gladstone reiterated that it's more about the BEET dollars and impact fees and where they are
used. Board Member Golembiewski recommended highlighting to Council the way impact fees for the
transportation program can be used is going to change.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell said she would be comfortable recommending support of this with the caveat that
the City Council needs to find additional funds to get at least one of those sidewalk projects done every year
because it's important to the community.
Board Member Mitchell spoke in support of the Green Streets program but suggested taking some of the funding
and first putting it towards sidewalks or at least delineating walkways to give these communities a safe walking
space. After those needs are met there might be more support from the community for the program. Vice Chair
Tragus-Campbell said she also supports the Green Streets program but is concerned about the safety of people
walking or riding their bikes down the street. She is very pleased about the traffic calming program in the plan
because people are going down streets way too fast, especially with the growing population. Having calming
measures, sidewalks, and bike lanes to make it safer outside of the bowl areas is something she would
recommend.
Chair Gladstone suggested a couple board members could work on a draft memo to be reviewed by the Planning
Board at the October 11 meeting. Director Feser noted that the memo would need to be ready to go into the
Council packet on October 12.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GOLEMBIEWSKI, SECONDED BY VICE CHAIR
TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THAT A SMALL GROUP
PREPARE A DRAFT MEMO. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chair Gladstone and Board Member Mitchell volunteered to work on the memo.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 6 of 7
Packet Pg. 259
6.2.e
NEW BUSINESS
None
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
Senior Planner Clugston noted he would be on vacation from October 6 through October 15. Michelle Martin
is also on leave right now, so logistically it will be difficult to get things done. He pointed out that the Tree Code
was already bumped to October 11. Tonight, the Board added the discussion regarding the CIP/CFP memo to
that meeting as well. Director McLaughlin was going to be at the October 11 meeting to talk about the
Comprehensive Plan, Highway 99 Community Renewal Program Update, and the Highway 99 Landmark Site
Discussion. Chair Gladstone noted they also need to have the discussion about the vision statement. Mr.
Clugston indicated that would be part of the Comprehensive Plan discussion on October 11.
Chair Gladstone proposed bumping the presentation to City Council to Monday, November 6 and doing it in
person.
There was discussion about having a small group work on a recommendation for trees similar to what they are
doing for the CIP/CFP recommendation. Board Members Golembiewski, Maxwell, and Tragus-Campbell
volunteered to have a memo ready for discussion at the October 11 meeting.
There was discussion about using the Comprehensive Plan discussion time for the vision statement and pushing
the Highway 99 Community Renewal Program Update out.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Gladstone noted she would be available but would be on east coast time on October 11.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
None
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 9:34 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
September 27, 2023 Page 7 of 7
Packet Pg. 260
6.2.f
October 11, 2023
Memo
To: Edmonds City Council Members
From: Edmonds Planning Board Members
Subject: 2024 CIP/CFP
The Planning Board received a presentation from the Public Works and Parks Departments outlining the
projects that make up their recommended 2024 CIP/CFP at the September 27 Planning Board meeting.
While some of the Board members had attended the Council briefing on September 19, some had not.
However, a copy of the CIP/CFP had been provided to Planning Board members by Planning Department
staff in early September.
The presentation provided to the Planning Board and Council was similar to those provided in past years
Individual and groups of projects were reviewed without background on how project decisions were
made. It was a list of what projects would be done, when, at what cost and from what funds. We
presume a lot of thought went into developing this, yet the document does not include any analysis or
ranking criteria that provides an understanding of how projects were prioritized. We believe Council and
the community needs to understand those ranking criteria to assess if the CIP/CFP is accomplishing
desired policies, objectives, and priorities.
The one policy direction that staff indicated is prioritizing the maintenance and repair of existing
infrastructure over installing new. The current CIP/CFP prioritization of existing and new projects is likely
to perpetuate and exacerbate the inequities that exist in the city that the Council has indicated they
want to improve upon. Project prioritization in the current CIP/CFP results in those parts of the city that
already have infrastructure amenities getting better ones and those without continuing to not have any.
This becomes a glaring inequity when most all of the REET dollars are spent on street preservation in the
near future in lieu of expanding sidewalk networks. No new sidewalks are planned to be constructed
until 2028 at the earliest. Some of the badly needed sidewalks, like 2361h St. SW between 84th Ave. W.
and HWY 99 where children walk to school every day on this arterial, are not in the 2024 CIP/CFP. We
recommend that Council seek from staff the ranking criteria of how the projects within the CIP/CFP were
selected.
In addition, if the Council is serious about addressing infrastructure inequities, then the information
provided to the Council needs to be organized and analyzed differently for better informed decision -
making. This can be done by organizing the revenues and expenditures for specific projects to more
easily see which projects are benefiting from the most discretionary of funding sources- REET. It would
also be informative to see a list of projects that are being funded by development impact fees. This will
give Council a better picture of what can be moved around to accomplish Council objectives to improve
equity. The Parks CIP/CFP has information organized this way; Public Works portion of the document
does not.
To accomplish equity goals, we also recommend that select projects in the current CIP/CFP be deferred
to address community needs. One example is the Green Streets project (PWT-64). While it does not have
any current secured sources of funding, the fact that it is listed in the CIP indicates where staff resources
Packet Pg. 261
6.2.f
will go to secure funding. For example, instead of seeking grants or other funding sources for that, they
could reallocate the projected estimate dollars of that project towards seeking funding for sidewalks that
are critical for pedestrian safety and wheelchair bound residents trying to navigate arterials without any
form of walkway.
To meet the timeline for Council's approval of the CIP/CFP the Planning Board is providing
recommendations for how you can make a better -informed decision rather than making a
recommendation to approve or not approve this CIP/CFP. In previous years the Planning Board has
requested to get information earlier about the criteria and policy direction for identifying projects and
their timing. Perhaps next year we will be better able to provide a more conclusive recommendation to
you.
Packet Pg. 262
6.2.g
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of Hybrid Meeting
October 11, 2023
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell called the hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:00 p.m. at
Edmonds City Hall and on Zoom. She announced she would be serving as administrator of the meeting since
Chair Gladstone was online in a different time zone and might need to drop off.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
The Land Acknowledgement was read by Board Member Mitchell.
ROLL CALL
Board Members Present
Judi Gladstone, Chair (online)
Lauren Golembiewski (online)
Richard Kuehn (online)
Susanna Martini
Nick Maxwell
Jeremy Mitchell
Beth Tragus-Campbell, Vice
Chair
Lily Distelhorst (student rep)
Board Members Absent
Emily Nutsch (altemate)(excused)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Staff Present
Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Director
Deb Powers, Urban Forest Planner
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell noted that Chair Gladstone had submitted amended comments to the group prior
to the meeting.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MITCHELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
MAXWELL, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 27, 2023 AS AMENDED. MOTION
PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL MOVED, CHAIR GLADSTONE SECONDED, TO ADD A
BRIEF DISCUSSION REGARDING THE TREE CODE AND SOME OF THE CONCLUSIONS THE
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Pagel of 8
Packet Pg. 263
6.2.g
GROUP CAME TO BEFORE THE CURRENT FIRST ITEM IN UNFINISHED BUSINESS. THE
MOTION PASSED.
BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL MOVED, CHAIR GLADSTONE SECONDED, REMOVING THE
PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT - 2023 Q3 ACCOMPLISHMENTS
FROM THE AGENDA IN LIEU OF BOARD MEMBERS READING THE REPORT ON THEIR
OWN AND FORWARDING QUESTIONS TO STAFF. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
None
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
A. Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department - 2023 Q3 Accomplishments - REMOVED
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Brief Tree Code Discussion
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell explained the subcommittee discussed all the various proposals and public
comments on the tree code and submitted a document with suggested language for the code. Board
Member Maxwell didn't think it was appropriate to discuss the code language specifically, just the
summary table of the guiding principles. There was concern about discussing this at all since it was not
included in the packet.
Director McLaughlin commented that it was not an accident this item was not included on the agenda.
The project is on pause at the staff level for legal review and director review. Chair Gladstone expressed
a concern about waiting too long to discuss this and having to start over again. Vice Chair Tragus-
Campbell suggested putting it on the agenda for the next meeting so they can stay updated on the staff
review. She thinks it is important for this to stay on the agenda every meeting until they can get an
answer and move forward. Board Member Maxwell suggested that legal review would be easier if they
actually had some clear language to review. He also pointed out that there was no legal review of the
step back ordinance. Board Member Martini asked what triggered this. Director McLaughlin said she
was not able to answer that. Board Member Martini did not like the prospect of repeatedly pushing this
down the road. Board Member Golembiewski expressed the concern about delaying this too long and
ending up with a Council that proposes an emergency ordinance. She hopes they get to a point where
they stop ruling by emergency ordinance.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 2 of 8
Packet Pg. 264
6.2.g
MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR TRAGUS-CAMPBELL, SECONDED BY BOARD
MEMBER MAXWELL, THEY HAVE A REVIEW OF THE PLANNING BOARD
SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION MEMO AND RECEIVE AN UPDATE FROM
STAFF ABOUT STATUS OF THE REVIEWS PROCESS AT THE OCTOBER 25 MEETING.
Board Member Kuehn expressed frustration about the situation. He doesn't understand why they can't
even have a discussion about this to keep the ball moving forward.
Board Member Maxwell noted that they could continue to share the key concepts tonight. Other board
members disagreed because the public didn't have a chance to review the documentation ahead of time.
Chair Gladstone expressed concern about having any process violations on this important topic. It was
noted there would need to be continued discussion about how all of this would impact the extended
agenda.
MOTION PASSED WITH BOARD MEMBER MITCHELL ABSTAINING.
B. Planning Board Action on 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) & Capital Improvement
Program (CIP)
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell referred to a memo drafted by another subcommittee regarding the Planning
Board's recommendation. The memo states that the Board does not have sufficient information to make a clear
recommendation. Chair Gladstone added that in the memo they tried to capture the concerns raised at the last
meeting around the CIP/CFP. She explained that they had primarily tried to characterize what the concerns were
around equity. They recognized there were gaps in the information that was provided in order to make a solid
recommendation. Board Member Mitchell commented that there is a time crunch to present this to Council. It
would take significant staff work to provide that backup information in time for the Board to make a formal
decision. For that reason, they have left it open and recommended that specific questions be asked.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell thought the memo captured what was discussed at the last meeting and also during
the last year. Mainly, they were raising questions about how items were prioritized. The public has consistently
brought up concerns around sidewalks, and there was concern about not having any of that in the plan. She
encouraged the Council to ask questions around prioritization and how they can make some progress toward
addressing inequities in the infrastructure.
Board Member Golembiewski asked if the intent was for these priorities to be presented to Council or for this
to come back to Planning Board before making a recommendation to Council. Chair Gladstone did not think
there was time for this to come back to the Planning Board which is why the memo ends up with things the
Board thinks the Council should look at to make an informed decision.
Board Member Martini thought that providing the Council with what they collectively agree on would be useful.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell concurred and noted that the memo outlines that.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MARTINI, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
MITCHELL, TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION MEMO TO CITY COUNCIL
REGARDING THE CIP/CFP AS WRITTEN. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 3 of 8
Packet Pg. 265
6.2.g
NEW BUSINESS
A. Landmark 99 Project Overview
Director McLaughlin made the presentation regarding the Landmark 99 project. She expressed appreciation to
Board Members Mitchell and Golembiewski for sitting on the advisory committee for this project and
representing the Planning Board. The site is located at the southern gateway of Edmonds at 24111 Highway 99.
It is ten acres, owned by one owner, and zoned General Commercial. She reviewed details about the site and
noted it is ideally situated for frequent transit by BRT and in close proximity to the upcoming light rail in
Mountlake Terrace. Burlington has a lease on the property until 2029.
Board Member Maxwell asked about the ownership of the cloverleaf. Director McLaughlin explained that is
owned by WSDOT. She added that one of the recommendations in the Community Renewal Plan is to pursue
rationalizing or removing that cloverleaf which would do a great deal to revitalize open space and perhaps
provide new parcels.
Director McLaughlin continued the presentation and explained that initially this site acquisition was led by
Parks for the purpose of seeking parks space. Parks did the zoning and massing study which shows how much
could be on that site. There has been interest from the community for years on revitalizing the southern gateway
and providing housing, open space, and community amenities. She reviewed illustrations about possibilities for
the site. She then discussed project organization, research/education, the community poll, tasks, timeline, and
co -dependencies. Staff is pursuing a master plan process on this site.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell asked about the possibility of this remaining greenspace. Director McLaughlin
explained that given the price tag, the location, and the fact that the City could not carry the costs alone she
doesn't anticipate that it would be a significant amount of green space. Plus, the location affords itself to
something a bit more dynamic that could absorb a lot of people on the site. However, this will be part of the
community conversation.
Board Member Golembiewski commented that it is likely that the project would not proceed if there were not
a strong private development partnership established before the decision deadline. Director McLaughlin
concurred and reviewed examples of public -private partnerships including Tukwila Village, Federal Way, and
Woodinville. She discussed poll results and noted there is strong support for a community center, recreation
facility, a police annex, park space, housing, retail, and dining.
Chair Gladstone asked if the respondents to the poll were self-selected or random. Director McLaughlin replied
they were self-selected. Chair Gladstone commented that the other category was quite large. Director
McLaughlin agreed and noted 120 of the 351 other comments said not to buy the property. Chair Gladstone
also asked if they knew where the respondents came from. Director McLaughlin said they did not. The first
broad community conversation will be held on October 21 from 10-12 at Edmonds Woodway High School.
For the October 21 public meeting, staff mailed the invitation to properties in the adjacent area and in multiple
languages. They will also be posting in the local papers, posting yard signs, running Facebook ads, etc. Vice
Chair Tragus-Campbell asked about the notification radius. She hasn't received anything in the mail but lives
very close to this. Director McLaughlin commented that since Council did not approve funding for this, they
have a very limited amount to spend. Chair Gladstone said she received an invitation in the mail.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 4 of 8
Packet Pg. 266
6.2.g
Board Member Golembiewski asked if it is safe to assume they would not see groundbreaking until 2029 since
Burlington has a lease through that date. Director McLaughlin thought they would probably need that much
time, and relocation prior to a lease expiration tends to be very expensive.
Board Member Martini asked about Council support for this. Board Member Mitchell explained they voted to
do the purchase agreement. Advisory committees and the team were formed to give them the best information
possible to make that decision in December. He encouraged the Planning Board to look at the project in the
context of the good it will be for the city and how it will benefit that area node. The price tag is a small thing in
his mind because he works in that area and is aware of all the tools available for cities to do that. The big part
of this is the partnership. He is excited for the potential, but he thinks there is a lot of work to do.
Chair Gladstone wondered how the location of this property compares to the geographic location of the example
properties in relation to what else is going on in their cities. Director McLaughlin explained that Tukwila is on
the northern boundary of city limits. In other ways, the consultant has indicated that both the Tukwila and
Federal Way examples are nearly identical to Edmonds.
Chair Gladstone asked if the property would be rolled into the community renewal area to take advantage of
those funding opportunities. Director McLaughlin replied that the community renewal plan affords more powers
by municipalities in the realm of land development. The City has the draft plan, which is not adopted, but if they
did adopt it, they would become a community renewal agency and would have a lot of flexible powers
associated with that. Pursuing site acquisition is not entirely relevant right now. They may want to consider
adopting it next year if they decide to exercise the purchase option. Tax increment financing (TIF) is a state tool
that is available to all municipalities. You are restricted to having two TIF areas in your jurisdiction, but the size
is not limited in area as much as it is in anticipated revenue. Federal Way created a very large TIF area, and
their project is right in the middle of it. There are a lot of opportunities with the Edmonds project as well.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell asked that staff provide plenty of examples to the public of how they are not just
planning on raising property taxes to come up with the $37 million. Director McLaughlin agreed.
Chair Gladstone referred to the comparisons and noted that each had a fair amount of housing associated with
it. She wondered how that related to housing goals for that area and for the rest of the city. Director McLaughlin
replied that they have consistently heard that housing, especially affordable housing, is of high demand. Right
now, it is more feasible to build housing than it is to build commercial. Board Member Mitchell clarified that
regarding meeting housing goals, all they are required to do per the GMA is to make adjustments in zoning to
provide that capacity. That parcel is already zoned for the capacity anyway, so it's already in the GMA
projections. Director McLaughlin concurred. She stressed that they are focusing on building the community and
finding the right balance of uses, not just the number of units.
Chair Gladstone asked if the repeal of Ordinance 4079 would affect this property at all. Director McLaughlin
replied that it would. SEPA is costly. It also elevates the risk for the developer because of the unknowns
associated with not only the environmental analysis, but the public process associated with an environmental
review.
Chair Gladstone said she was surprised to learn that there was Planning Board representation on the advisory
group. Director McLaughlin explained the members were recently chosen by the Mayor in collaboration with
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 5 of 8
Packet Pg. 267
6.2.g
the Council President, and they got off to a bumpy start. They just had their first meeting two weeks ago. They
anticipate keeping the advisory group going until final decisions are made on the property. Vice Chair Tragus-
Campbell suggested adding a section to the agenda for an advisory board report out.
Board Member Maxwell said it is somewhat important to acknowledge that the success of the Civic Park
indicates that they have some talent at creating public spaces which matters. Based on other public spaces in the
City, it is very promising that it would work out well. Board Member Martini concurred and added that the
accessibility for the new Civic Park is amazing.
B. Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement Review
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell said the City Council requested that the Planning Board review the original vision
statement and associated word cloud and make a recommendation to the Council by November 30. Director
McLaughlin provided some background on the Comprehensive Plan branding process and the six -week targeted
public outreach process. Throughout the process, 8500 comments were received and categorized. From this, a
draft vision statement was created along with a graphic illustration of the process. The statement was put through
a multilingual review process to make sure that words weren't misinterpreted or not understood by different
languages.
Draft community vision statement:
Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value environmental
stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, and a thriving arts scene. We
are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient future.
A survey was put in the city newsletter to see if they generally got the statement right. 51 % of those who
responded were supportive of the statement. 49% were not. Director McLaughlin reviewed how each of the
phrases correspond to the most commonly used words. She explained that Council had specific concerns about
the phrase "healthy streets". While "healthy" was not a word that was necessarily represented, staff thought it
did represent the other words used such as walkability, green, biking, pedestrian, kids, etc. She summarized the
Council resolution as previously discussed by Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell with the request that Planning Board
provide feedback and recommendations to the City Council about which of the versions to adopt ("as is" or
with suggested revisions) as soon as possible. Director McLaughlin stated she is confident in their process and
believes that the draft community vision statement is representative of the comments. She thinks if they have to
revisit the statement for an extended period of time, they risk delaying the plan itself. She pointed out that the
State does not require a vision statement to be part of the comprehensive plan for the Growth Management Act.
It was something staff wanted to use to energize people around in high level conversation. They did that and
were able to categorize key themes to be used moving forward. If the Board wishes to advance another version,
staff recommend striking the word "healthy" and just keeping it to "safe streets".
Discussion:
Board Member Mitchell pointed out that the Council wouldn't have drafted the resolution if they were happy
with it. He assumed they wanted the Board to revise it. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell concurred. Board Member
Mitchell said he didn't like how the resolution was drafted in the first place, pinning the original draft vision
statement to the Bloom version. A more appropriate resolution would have been to send it to a steering
committee of some kind to evaluate the data, come up with two versions, and bring those two versions to the
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 6 of 8
Packet Pg. 268
6.2.g
Planning Board. It seems like a step was missed in the process engagement by just picking Ms. Bloom's version.
He suggested making the revisions to the original statement rather than just sending one or the other back.
Board Member Maxwell thought that Director McLaughlin's approach was reasonable rather than jumping to
rewriting the vision statement.
Vice Chair Tragus Campbell asked the Board if they wanted to tackle any sort of revision or if they support
going with the staff recommendation of just moving forward.
Chair Gladstone recalled they had discussed the vision statement earlier in the year and that there was a general
feeling that it wasn't really a vision statement; instead, it was more of a statement of values. She thought that
the phrases in the vision statement were fair representations of the comments they received. In her mind, it
would be improved by voicing it as a vision statement and not a value statement, but she didn't know if this was
what Council had in mind. She thinks to go without a value statement is going to plague the process of the
comprehensive plan with various residents. She recommended spending time on this at a different meeting to
try to coalesce around a vision statement that contains most of the concepts here.
Board Member Golembiewski said she thinks this vision statement is very close to acceptable. She thinks it
accurately reflects the comments received. She thinks it could be as simple as, "Edmonds strives to be a
welcoming city ..." She agrees that the word "healthy" associated with streets is a little weird although she
understands the thought process behind it. Health is something they value as far as being an active, healthy
community that takes pride in outdoor spaces and walkability and things like that.
Board Member Kuehn agreed with Chair Gladstone that this seems more like a statement of values rather than
a vision statement. He also agreed that it was very close and could use some tweaking to voice it as a vision
statement. He would like to tweak it at a future meeting and send a recommendation to Council.
Board Member Martini expressed concern about kicking this down the road. She recommended establishing a
timeframe in which to finish this.
Student Representative Distelhorst said she was surprised they were still talking about the vision statement. She
doesn't understand why this has taken so long.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell recommended forming another subcommittee. Director McLaughlin commented
that staff would want to be part of that to make sure that all those statements are taken into account. The
translation issue is also very important. They do not have any consultant funding at all for this right now.
Board Member Kuehn thought that if they just tweak some of the wording to make it a vision statement, but
don't change the message, it could be good enough. It wouldn't need to be anything that changes from the word
cloud. Director McLaughlin explained it was intended to be written in the present tense as if you were already
in the future.
Board Member Golembiewski asked if they could just call it a value statement since a vision statement isn't a
required element of the comprehensive plan. Board Member Kuehn said he recommended that months ago.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 7 of 8
Packet Pg. 269
6.2.g
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MARTINI TO DECLARE THIS TO BE A VALUE
STATEMENT INSTEAD OF A VISION STATEMENT AND THAT THE PLANNING BOARD
CONSTRUCT MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO IT AT THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
MOTION MADE BY CHAIR GLADSTONE, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER KUEHN, THAT
THEY WORK WITH STAFF TO TWEAK THIS AND COME BACK TO THE PLANNING BOARD
NO LATER THAN TWO MEETINGS FROM NOW. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
There will be a tree code update at the next meeting. There will also be a discussion or recommendation on the
Critical Aquifer Recharge Zone and a comprehensive plan discussion. Highway 99 community renewal
program update is being removed from the 25th. If there are any comments regarding the Parks, Recreation &
Human Services Department - 2023 Q3 Accomplishments, they should be sent to Director Feser.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Gladstone said it was nice to see Director McLaughlin at the meeting. She thanked Ms. Powers for filling
in for Mike Clugston.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell thanked everyone for their participation.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 9:17 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 8 of 8
Packet Pg. 270
6.2.h
#
CM
Question/Response
1
DT
PWT-01: When Council approved the $20 car tab increase earlier in 2023, we did so with the understanding the incremental $700k in
revenue would be applied to the 2024 street preservation budget on top of the 2023 level of investment in the program. At $1.6m, the
2024 proposed investment level shown in the CIP/CFP appears to fall short of that understanding. Why?
PW
The tab fees is for street preservation "solely for transportation improvements that preserve, maintain and operate the existing
transportation infrastructure of the city" Since established, the city has used this revenue to fund our in-house maintenance and repair
efforts not the annual CIP. CIP pavement preservation funds use mostly REET funds, and to maximize these funds engineers coordinate
pavement preservation projects with utilities to "repair once" a section of our transportation network.
2
DT
PWT-31: the 236th walkway appears to be considered for investment beyond 2030. Can this be moved forward in the schedule? With
revitalization of the subarea, there will be far more residents walking in that neighborhood. Also, is there any way the walkway can be
installed at a lower cost? For instance, in the Sherwood neighborhood, the walkway is generally on one side of the street and is simply
asphalt with a painted white line —similar to a bike lane. Where we are lacking walkways, can we consider installing asphalt sidewalks
rather than concrete to stretch our dollars and deliver sidewalks earlier than now planned?
PW
Council can direct staff to change the priority, will need to identify what project will not be completed or a new revenue source to fund
the project.
Alternate methods to meet pedestrian needs can be considered during the design process, in addition the council can direct staff to
develop new standards for new construction and adopt those standards. That said the best surface has been proven to be concrete
sidewalks, all other possible options would have to be evaluated to our conditions.
3
DT
PWT 64: total cost is shown as $3.5m: many times more expensive than standard sidewalks. I'd recommend moving this entire concept
back into the "2030-2044" column until the city can determine how we can integrate green streets into the budget without delaying
much needed sidewalks where they are most needed.
PW
There are no funds identified for this project, design can only start when funds become available, it will keep sliding to the right until
funded. However if we show that we are not committed to do something until 2030-2044 we will not be able to compete for grants.
4
DT
PWT 36: If there is already a sidewalk on one side of Walnut, I'd recommend moving this project back into the "2030-2044" column and
reserve this investment for areas of the city with no sidewalks on either side of the street.
PW
Same answer as PWT 64. There is no sidewalk on either side.
U)
aD
0
U_
M
.r
.Q
t�
0
N
0
N
v
N
0
N
a
0
a
M
N
0
N
ri
0
0
x
�L
Q
c
0
CY
U)
Y
L0
2
a
0
c
d
E
z
0
r
r
Q
r
c
m
E
M
U
0
w
r
Q
Packet Pg. 271
6.2.h
5 DT PWT-04: Why is the Main St overlay not being done all the way to 9th Ave, when Main St has been excavated for storm sewer upgrades
between 6th and 9th?
PW The City received a federal grant for a pavement overlay between 6th Ave to 8th Ave. The grant has a specific deadline to meet to
obligate construction funds. Changing the project limits would require a PSRC amendment and supplement agreement with the
consultant to modify the project which will slow progress and risk meeting the grant timeline and advertising the project in the first
quarter of 2024. The section on Main St. between 8th Ave to 9th Ave will be paved in a following year as part of the City's locally
funded paving program.
6 DT PWT-12: It appears the project on Highway 99 on the east side of the highway is either in MLT or Lynnwood. Are either of those cities
contributing to the cost of installing the planter strip on the east side of the highway? Same question for PWT-16.
PW During the planning stages (prior to Federal / State grant application submittals), discussions with the different agencies impacted will
be held in order to determine the local funding contributions for the project phases.
7 DT PWT-21: Minor issue: the project description refers to Completed Streets. Should say Complete Streets. And a general question: are
we still working toward the goals the city earlier defined about Complete Streets? I've seen nothing in recent planning discussion about
Complete Streets, yet things like bicycle lanes, safer pedestrian crossings, etc. all fall within that concept.
PW Typo has been corrected. Yes on complete streets, it is a work in progress and part of our comprehensive transportation plan update.
Good to see that you are paying attention on what a complete street is.
8 1 DT PWT-25: Much of this project appears to lie within Esperance. Is the County splitting the project costs with Edmonds?
Packet Pg. 272
6.2.h
#
CM
Question/Response
PW
This project along 84th Ave. W is shared between Edmonds and Snohomish County. During the planning stages (prior to submitted grant
applications). discussions will be held with Snohomish County to determine local contributions for this project (serving as local match).
9
DT
PWT-26: This is a traffic project on SR-104 involving an additional turning lane. Is the state contributing to the cost of this project?
PW
WSDOT will most likely not fund this type of improvement project. Since the intersection is shared between Edmonds and Shoreline
(signal owned by Shoreline), Federal / State grant applications will need to be submitted to fund this project (combined with local
funding contributions / serving as local match).
10
DT
PWT-67: What will be achieved with expenditure of $50k? If this item involves a review of the work done in 2016-2017 that led up to
the Waterfront Connector proposal, can't a citizen/city task force be assembled to review those options? Also, I believe the scope
should be expanded to include more than emergency waterfront access, should involve the Port and should examine what more can be
done to ensure health/safety on the west side of the tracks (e.g., training additional personnel on use of the fire boat stationed at the
marina, placing aid kits at regular intervals for use in quick response to injuries, identifying landing sites for a helicopter to evacuate an
injured person if the tracks are blocked, etc.)
PW
Council requested this, and it can change if that is the goal.
11
DT
PWT-31: Please move up the schedule for this project to 2026. Also, does this project involve a sidewalk on both sides of 236th? If so,
can we consider placing a sidewalk on one side of the street (such as now exists in many parts of Edmonds) to deliver a much needed
sidewalk amenity sooner and at lower cost?
PW
Will wait for council to provide direction in moving the project forward. The cost reflects sidewalk on one -side of the street.
Too early to know what is possible, the design will determine if there is enough right of way, issues with utilities, parking etc.
12
DT
PWT-32: Please move this project up to 2026 or earlier.
PW
Staff can move it forward at council's direction if City Council identifies a funding source. The ARPA funds identified for design have
been transferred to the General Fund.
13
DT
PWT-33: This is the top rated long walkway project identified in the 2015 transportation plan, yet it is not yet complete. Please move
this project into the 2025 schedule.
PW
Funding? Identify a source of funding and these projects can be moved forward.
14
DT
PWT-39: This item is shown as only $15k for 2024, yet the total project cost for these bike lanes is estimated at $3m. The narrative
doesn't explain the discrepancy. Is the $15k just project close out costs? If so, that should be explained.
PW
lComment addressed in revised PW CIP-CFP draft.
15
DT
Please move this item out to the 2030-2044 column, pending further discussion about a pedestrian/bicycle overpass near this
IPWT-43:
site, which may eliminate the need for this item.
U)
aD
0
U_
.r
.Q
0
0
0
N
O
N
v
N
O
N
a
0
a
M
N
O
N
ri
0
0
x
�L
M
2
Q
c
0
CY
U)
Y
L0
2
a
r
a
Packet Pg. 273
6.2.h
#
CM
Question/Response
PW
Several unsuccessful grant applications have been submitted for this project over the last 5 years (through joint Federal / State grant
applications with Shoreline since shared intersection). As part of the 2024 Transportation Plan, the pedestrian / bicycle overpass
project will be discussed to determine its inclusion into the plan. Staff recommends keeping the project in the six year plan until
completion of the 2024 Transportation Plan update.
16
DT
PWT-50: This project addresses a serious and long-standing pedestrian safety problem along 238th from 76th to Highway 99. This is
one of the primary walking routes from 76th to the amenities at the Safeway complex —including the new neighborhood city hall.
There have been no sidewalks along 76th for decades and this area simply must have them. Please move this project up to begin in
2025 as a priority.
PW
Funding? Identify a source of funding and this project can be moved forward.
17
DT
PWT-55: The 2024 project cost shows $10k, but the overall project cost shows as $1.1m. I presume the $10k cost is for project close
out, but the narrative doesn't indicate what the cost is for. Please clarify.
PW
Comment addressed in revised PW CIP-CFP draft. The $10k in 2024 is for project close-out.
18
DT
PWT-60: RFIB signals are needed at the crosswalk on 7th Ave between Daley and Bell Streets. The new Civic Field is very heavily used,
with many more cars now parked on both sides of 7th. When cars are parked near the sidewalk, pedestrians aren't visible until they are
well out into the crosswalk. Please program RFIB signals at that location for 2024.
PW
As part of the 2024 Pedestrian Safety Program (if approved as part of 2024 Budget), RRFB's will be added at selected locations. A list of
potential locations has already been created and this specific crosswalk will be included in the evaluation (with the highest ranked
locations to be funded / based on funding available).
19
DT
PWT-69: this project is for replacement of deteriorated sidewalk on the east side of Civic Field on 7th Ave. The funding is shown as
being spent in 2027 and 2028. However, my understanding is this project will be undertaken in 2024 and that funding has been fully
identified to cover the cost. Please revise this item to show the project commencing in 2024 and that funding is secured.
PW
Project has been removed from document and will start in spring 2024.
20
DT
PWT-51: this project is for restriping SR-104 to accommodate additional ferry vehicle storage space. This project is 100% on a state
highway and provides no benefit to Edmonds. The state should be responsible for 100% of the cost of this project. It is now shown as
"unsecured funding." Please explain why Edmonds taxpayers would be responsible for this $380k cost. And if the state is responsible,
please revise the project cost matrix accordingly.
PW
This project was identified in SR-104 Study (completed in 2015). This project is 100% within WSDOT Limited Access. WSDOT recently
completed Ferry Storage Improvements within the opening of one of their STORAGE lanes and through striping improvements.
However in order to further reduce queues going up SR-104 (impacting driveways along this corridor), additional improvements are
needed. The project sheet shows funding unsecured. The project could be funded by WSDOT or a future grant and is shown in this
document since there may be an opportunity for the City to secure a future grant to complete the work.
a�
0
U_
.r
.Q
C.�
N
O
N
v
N
0
N
a
0
Q
M
N
O
N
ri
0
0
x
�L
Q
c
0
CY
U)
Y
L0
2
a
0
c
d
E
z
0
r
Q
c
m
E
M
U
0
w
r
a
Packet Pg. 274
6.2.h
#
CM
Question/Response
21
DT
PWT-52: Edmonds residents living in the area of 76th Ave. W. and Meadowdale Beach Road have been complaining for years about
drivers travelling southbound on 76th at high rates of speed to get their vehicles airborne at the dip and rise in the road there. During
the past decade, there have been 15 documented vehicular accidents there, some of them with injuries (Chief Bennett provided
documentation of these accidents —this information has been forward to Director Antillon). 76th Ave. W. between Haines Wharf and
Olympic Ave. is nearly two miles of straight road and is highly prone to speeding. Since the street is straight for such a long stretch, it is
highly unusual that there would be that many accidents in that area. One suggestion is to make the 76th Ave. W and Meadowdale
Beach Road intersection (a T intersection) a three way stop to prevent drivers from accelerating all the way from Haines Wharf to
Perrinville. Please strongly consider this suggestion, which could be implemented at relatively low cost and would be much appreciated
by the area residents as a means of keeping them and drivers safer.
PW
As part of the 2023 Traffic Calming Program, this specific stretch was evaluated. However following the speed study, the 85th
percentile speeds didn't meet the threshold (less than 5 mph over the speed limit) / stretch didn't move forward in evaluation. The
conversion of 76th Ave. @ Meadowdale Beach Rd to an ALL -WAY stop would be warranted if the volumes along 76th Ave. W were — 2X
greater than along Meadowdale Beach Rd (since 3 approach roadway / based on MUTCD requirements). A study was completed in 2022
and the warrant wasn't met. Another traffic county will be completed in 2023.
22
DT
PWT-53: The city is behind schedule on addressing ADA issues citywide. This proposal shows $440k in funding to do an evaluation and
prioritization of ADA issues in 2025. Please move this up to 2024 and allocate ARPA funds for the update. Also, the DEIA commission is
working to identify the highest priority ADA issues that need to be completed and will be providing that input to Council and Public
Works. This input can feed directly into the ADA transition plan update.
PW
I Funding? Staff can move it forward at council's direction if the City Council identifies a funding source.
23
DT
PWT-64: Council has not yet approved implementation of Green Streets, as the cost of these projects is very high and the city needs to
first prioritize pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular safety projects where they are sorely needed and have been lacking for decades. Please
treat Green Streets as a concept that should be further investigated and move the $3.5m funding shown in this item out to the 2030-
2044 column. However, elements of green streets (such as rain gardens, proper street tree planting, permeable paving, etc.) should be
pursued incrementally as budget allows.
PW
City Council can decide to move this project to the out years.
24
DT
PWD-04: funding sources as shown indicate nearly half of the cost of this project will be from local and/or ARPA funds. However, we
have discussed that BNSF and federal funds will be available for a significant portion of this project, as well as contributions by
Lynnwood. If this is correct, please update the cost matrix accordingly. If nearly $2m of the project cost will be actually be charged to
the Stormwater Fund, it will create continued upward pressure on stormwater rates charged to Edmonds citizens.
U)
aD
0
U_
M
.r
.Q
t�
0
N
O
N
v
N
0
N
a
0
a
M
N
0
N
M
0
0
�L
r.+
0
Q
c
0
CY
U)
Y
L
0
a
0
c
d
E
z
0
r
r
Q
r
c
m
E
M
U
0
w
r
a
Packet Pg. 275
6.2.h
#
CMI
Question/Response
PW
This reflects the best available information that we have for the funds needed to complete the project at this time. Any funding not
covered by ARPA will need to be grant funds which historically requires at least a 25% local matching fund source. Contributions from
the City of Lynnwood for this project are highly unlikely, since this system is not part of their MS4. BNSF does not use their own funds
for projects. They will build/retrofit these types of projects if they get grants. Matching funds need to be available to allow us to
pursue and qualify for grants. If these funds are not available, we would not be able to apply or qualify and/or improve our standing for
the vast majority of grants that need to be pursued to complete this project and any other project that is pursuing grant funds. If
council decides it does not desire to use stormwater funds for matching funds, council would need to determine the alternate source.
25
DT
PWD-04: In addition to a watershed analysis for Perrinville Creek, we need to identify a similar analysis for Shell Creek, which has been
identified as the second highest priority restoration focus (Perrinville Creek is the highest priority restoration focus). The Shell Creek
analysis can be funded, in part, by the $120k carryforward Council allocated for Yost Park restoration. If additional funding is needed,
please show ARPA as the funding source, and show this analysis as beginning in 2024.
PW
A project can be added, but council needs to identify a funding source. ARPA funds may not be available. This study can be considered
for future funding/prioritization as part of the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan update.
26
DT
PWD-23: Please update the cost matrix to indicate Lynnwood's contribution to the Perrinville Creek basin analysis cost.
PW
Comment addressed in revised PW CIP-CFP draft.
27
DT
PWF-10: The Edmonds Museum restroom is not ADA-compliant. The toilet in the single restroom in the building is raised off the floor,
making it extremely difficult for a wheelchair -bound person to use. Please add this needed upgrade to this item.
PW
Noted, please provide direction, at this point we don't have an ADA transition plan for facilities but this can be prioritized. The building
is old and it might be difficult to meet ADA.
28
DT
PWF-18: the costs shown in the expense matrix seem very low for the scope of work identified in the narrative for the Yost Pool pool
house. For instance, the highest cost shown in any of the five years in the matrix is $30k. Yet, the narrative shows roof and gutter
replacement is needed. Please verify the cost numbers as shown are correct.
PW
These are preliminary estimates, once a more detail investigation is completed possibly partnering with JOC contractors the estimates
will be updated.
U)
aD
0
U_
M
.r
.Q
t�
0
N
O
N
v
N
O
N
a
0
a
M
N
O
N
ri
0
0
x
�L
.r
0
Q
c
0
CY
U)
Y
`0
2
a
r
a
Packet Pg. 276
6.2.h
#
CM
Question/Response
29
DT
PWF-23: As discussed in the project narrative, the library roof membrane has been leaking for over 20 years since it was initially
installed. The newly -refurbished library (which was severely damaged by a major water leak) will reopen in late 2023. It is simply
unwise to reopen the library to the public without a near -term plan to permanently address the chronically leaking roof, as continued
water leakage may lead to mold -related public health issues in the building. As stated in the narrative, the city obtained an estimate in
2018 for demolish and replace the entire roof membrane. Additionally, a structural assessment was completed in 2021. This project
can and should be broken into two components: first, the current "green roof" structures should be demolished and the roof
membrane replaced to make the library roof waterproof. The cost of this item is shown as $4.9m, with the project apparently initiated
and completed in 2029. Please revise this item to show the project commencing with final design in 2024 with project completion in
2026. This item can be funded via ARPA funds, since the city has remaining approx. $8m in unused ARPA funds (and our contract with
Snolsle shows they will contribute a portion of the cost of this project, so they should be shown as a partial funding source). The ARPA
guidelines state these funds must be fully expended by the end of 2026. The second phase of this project is rebuilding of the planters
and surface features on the library roof. That portion of the project should be shown as commencing during or after 2026, as
determined by design.
PW
There are no funds assigned for the project, if council prioritizes this project funding will have to be identified for the design
30
DT
PWP-04: This project cost is shown as over $40m across a five year period. However, litigation is pending about the level of nutrient
removal required of the cities. If the cities are given legal relief from Dept. of Ecology's standards, will that relief reduce the cost
estimates shown?
PW
Preliminary costs. Once design has been completed we will have a more accurate estimate.
31
DT
PWP-10: the total estimated project cost is shown as $250k. Yet, the expense matrix below shows he cost as $250k for each of the
years of 2024, 2025 and 2026. Is the total cost actually $750k?
PW
Comment addressed in revised PW CIP-CFP draft. Cost is for 2024.
32
VO
76th street by Meadowdale road and/or by 171- too long a stretch without a signal or traffic calming
PW
As part of the 2023 Traffic Calming Program, this specific stretch was evaluated. However following the speed study, the 85th
percentile speeds didn't meet the threshold (less than 5 mph over the speed limit) / stretch didn't move forward in evaluation. The
conversion of 76th Ave. @ Meadowdale Beach Rd to an ALL -WAY stop would be warranted if the volumes along 76th Ave. W were — 2X
greater than along Meadowdale Beach Rd (since 3 approach roadway / based on MUTCD requirements). A study was completed in 2022
and the warrant wasn't met. Another traffic count will be completed in 2023.
33
VO
100th and SR 104- c page 29 CIP/CFP- no right of way purchase expense is detailed when infrastructure can/should be improved so bike
lanes can be added without losing driving lanes (packet page 35)
PW
Comment addressed in revised PW CIP-CFP draft. Preliminary right of way cost added.
34
VO
76th and OVD- is this a shared cost between COL and COE? Is it in their CFP too (our CFP page 32, packet page 38). Same with OVD at
Meadowdale beach rd and 174th, CFP page 35, packet page 41)
Also, shared with COShoreline? 104 and 76 at 205 (CFP/CIP page 52)
U)
aD
0
U_
M
.r
.Q
t�
0
N
O
N
v
N
O
N
a
0
a
M
N
O
N
M
0
0
x
�L
Q
c
0
CY
U)
Y
L
0
2
a
0
c
d
E
z
0
r
Q
c
m
E
M
0
w
Q
Packet Pg. 277
6.2.h
#
CM
Question/Response
PW
Yes, 76th @ OVD is a shared intersection. During the planning stages (prior to submitted grant applications). discussions will be held
with Lynnwood to determine local contributions for this project (serving as local match).
35
VO
Isn't some part of 84th sidewalk (CFP page 33) being prioritized in 2024 budget? Yes sidewalk design (from 234-238th) in 2024 1 see on
CFP page 43 but work not until 2027. Is this timing acceptable?
PW
Staff can move it forward at council's direction if City Council identifies a funding source. The ARPA funds identified for design have
been transferred to the General Fund.
36
VO
DT street lighting- how about pedestrian street lighting needed near Inter urban trail? CIP Page 53
PW
A Citywide Lighting Study is currently being completed. The Interurban Trail is one of the stretches being evaluated. Further lighting
evaluation may be included in the Safety Action Plan (if city receives federal grant).
37
VO
4th Ave corridor- private funding/ capital campaign or move back in timeline
PW
Keeping the project in the six -year list will make it eligible to pursue public/private grant funding in the future.
38
VO
I am confused by the numbers on CFP page 88 (7317 Lake Ballinger away Floodplain purchase and structure removal): secured 500k
ecology grant is referenced in narrative (which also says that the purchase is intended/ not yet done) ward project costs are 750k and
2024 costs are only ones there (and 120k)
PW
Narrative clarified to show that the current schedule is to purchase the property in 2023. So the majority of funds will be expended
before 2024, which is when the site demolition and revegetation will take place.
39
VO
Update references to RFA (from South Sno Co Fire) CIP/CFP pages 108, 109, 110 for fire stations
PW
Noted
40
VO
Meadowdale clubhouse page 114, PWF-12- almost 100k in 2024 unsecured funding. Does this mean no more bonding for deferred
maintenance or doesn't that qualify?
PW
Noted, will evaluate if these fit the bond requirements
41
VO
Old Public Works- page 115 do the 2024 and 2025 expenditures make sense in the context of upcoming change in use being talked
about? See page 127 with construction (probably on that same site) in 2027.
Also same as above. What does it mean to have work planned in 2024 and no secured funding?
Also- wade James theater (2024 work and no secured funding)
Also fire life safety communications PWF 19 on page 121— don't we need to prioritize this?
PW
Roll up door is dangerous, and HVAC system need to be repaired since the building is still occupied, and eligible for bonds funds. Not
included on list for Bonds project, these projects are typically funded with Facilities General Funds.
42
VO
Library Plaza roof deck waterproofing project PWF 23, page 122 move design to 2024 and construction to 2025 ARPA
PW
There are no funds assigned for the project, if council prioritizes this project funding will have to be identified for the design
43
VO
Will the restroom/showers at the Bracketts landing waterfront get addressed? (This was covered 1. Todays presentation- I am glad this
is being prioritized in the maintenance budget). What about the signage at Bracketts landing that says marine sanctuary overhead?
U)
aD
0
U_
M
.r
.Q
t�
0
N
O
N
v
N
0
N
a
0
Q
M
N
O
N
M
O
0
x
�L
Q
c
0
CY
U)
Y
`0
2
a
0
c
d
E
z
0
r
Q
c
m
E
M
0
w
r
a
Packet Pg. 278
6.2.h
#
CM
Question/Response
PW
Parks led projects
44
VO
175th slope repair- when was the problem first established/id'd? In 2019, it was said that the temporary fix (cones) had already been
there for years). How many years is acceptable number for something like this to be unaddressed? What does 2023 construction cost
moved to 2026 to 2027 mean?
PW
Based on documents, the issue dates back to at least 2004. Staff will continue to monitor the slope. Staff can move the project forwarc
if City Council identifies a funding source.
45
VO
232nd from 100th to 105 timing move may not be okay (from2027-28 to 28-29).
PW
IStaff can move it forward at council's direction if City Council identifies a funding source.
46
VO
Same Re 84th from 238 to 234 (move from 26-28 to 27-29)
PW
Staff can move it forward at council's direction if City Council identifies a funding source.
U)
aD
0
U-
M
.r
.Q
t�
CD
N
O
N
v
N
O
N
a
0
a
M
N
O
N
M
O
O
x
�L
r.+
C�
C
Q
C
ry�
V
U)
Y
L
0
:.:
a
00
c
a�
E
z
0
r
r
Q
r
c
m
E
U
R
El
Packet Pg. 279
6.2.i
# JCM Question/Response
Submitted 11/2/23
47 SP
When the updated Transportation plan is approved, will all of these out year projects get reassigned in order of community priority?
Could you describe that process? (CM Paine)
PW
As part of the 2024 Transportation Plan (currently being worked on), all proposed projects will be ranked based on a set of criteria.
Following this evaluation, the ranking will be reviewed by the Transportation Committee and the public during Open Houses. Revisions
might be made based on Committee and public comments. The prioritized project list will be included in the draft plan when it is
presented to the Planning Board and City Council for review and discussion.
48 SP
PWT 68 Is there any opportunity for utility coordination/undergrounding? (CM Paine)
PW
The 881h Ave Overlay/Sidewalk repair is a follow-up project after the City completed water and stormwater replacement work in 88th
Ave. Staff has not pursued expanding the scope of work to include the conversion of overhead utilities to underground due to cost.
49 SP
PWT 08 This project will need extensive community input and I would like to see significant funding from County and Sound Transit to
support this project. (CM Paine)
PW
During the Planning Phase / prior to the submittal of grant application for this project (228th St from Hwy 99 to 95th), coordination and
many discussions will need to take place between the City and the County (since the ROW for the entire project is split 50 / 50 between
both Cities). In order to reduce the total grant request (possible contribution toward local match of future grant application), the City
can discuss with the County to see if they have available funding.
50 SP
PWT 12 Will we coordinate with Lynnwood?(CM Paine)
PW
Since this project (Hwy 99 from 216th St to 212th St) is partially within City of Lynnwood ROW, discussions with Lynnwood will occur
during the Planning Phase (prior to grant application submittal).
51 SP
PWT 181 would like to see the placement of a stop light rather than a small roundabout. There are some challenges about how to use a
roundabout. In addition, those are quite expensive due to ROW needs. (CM Paine)
PW
As part of the 2024 Transportation Plan, this intersection will be re-evaluated based on the existing traffic conditions / projected
growth rate. A new intersection delay / Level of Service will be determined. The proposed improvements at this intersection will also be
identified (based on comparing different intersection configuration modeling results).
52 SP
PWT 19 I'd like to have more discussion regarding active transportation being included there and I'd also like to have any utility work
coordinated for the purpose of undergrounding PUD and telecom facilities. (CM Paine)
PW
The active transportation improvements at this intersection (76th Ave/220th St) include adding bike lanes to the intersection (currently
ends — 300' from the intersection for the eastbound and southbound movement) and adding bike lanes both approaching and departing
the southern portion of the intersection (currently not existing). Planter strips will be added in front of sidewalk along certain sections
of the intersection and sidewalks will be widened (improving pedestrian safety conditions).
w
m
M
u.
Ta
CL
M
U
rn
N
0
N
le
N
0
N
a
0
a
M
N
0
N
to
0
X
�L
a
a
M
a
a
LL
U
I
U
a
rn
d
E
t
�a
Q
0
E
a
Packet Pg. 280
s.2.i
# JCM
I
Question/Response
53 SP
PWT 24 76th and OVD — Can this be moved up to 2027? (CM Paine)
PW
As part of the 2024 Transportation Plan , this intersection is being re-evaluated based on the existing traffic volumes and projected
growth rate. As previously indicated, all proposed projects will be ranked based on a set of criteria. This new priority ranking will help
determine the year(s) each project will be identified within future planning documents (such as CIP / TIP).
54 SP
PWT 32 84th sidewalks — Will the design proposed for this sidewalk placement help get additional funding sources opportunities. (CM
Paine)
PW
Completing design and environmental review prior to submitting a grant application can increase the score for grant applications that
include points for project readiness. Completing design work also improves the accuracy of cost estimates that are submitted with
grant applications.
55 SP
PWT 45 The neighbors using 5th and Pine would like to have a more secure/safer crossing going across 5th. (CM Paine)
PW
Pedestrian -Actuated Flashing Beacons will be installed at 5th Ave. S @ Pine St. before the end of this year.
56 SP
PWT 69 7th Ave curb and gutter - need more information on the critical nature of this project and the prior decisions made by Council,
source of funding for the work and how transferable are these funds to go towards other projects. (CM Paine)
PW
The proposed source of funding is bond proceeds since the sidewalk is adjacent to City property and $100k in stormwater utility
funding.
57 SP
PWT 53 ADA Transition Plan — Citywide I'd love to see this moved forward. As I understand the dimension- we need the funding and it's
not due to staff constraints. (CM Paine)
PW
A funding source needs to be identified to include it in the 2024 Budget. Waiting until 2025 may provide an opportunity to fund a
portion ($100k-$1SOK) of the Plan related to public right of way with grant funds from Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program in
the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL).
58 SP
PWW 01 Can there be utility coordination with the PUD & telecom with the replacement projects? (CM Paine)
PW
Staff coordinates all projects with utility providers in Edmonds during the design phase to identify potential conflicts and reduce the
possibility of incurring extra costs during construction.
59 SP
PWF — general question for the Facilities projects These will need the bond money to proceed?(CM Paine)
PW
Submitted
60 VO Per resident Liz Smalley, the worst parts of 238th are from 104 (Westgate Chapel) to 84th. My sense is that this walkway project is the
Edmonds section and the rest is Esperance. Does this sound right? Dir Antillon, do you know if Snohomish County has the rest of this
walkway identified in their plan? If not, how do we go about making the request for them to add it?
Packet Pg. 281
6.2.i
#
JCM
Question/Response
PW
The street referenced in the question is misidentified as 238th St. It appers the question is related to 228th Stand is project PWT-08 in
the CIP / CFP. Discussions have previously been held with Snohomish County about this project. Follow-up discussions need to be held
with the County in order to confirm this stretch is within their plan as well. During the preliminary planning phase of the project (prior
to submitting the grant applications), meetings will be held with the County (in order to determine if they have any funding available /
serving as local match for future grant applications).
61 VO
I know we have know money, but these residents have had cones marking breakage on their street so they don't drive into the part that
falls off... it will be for 20 years in 2024! What is the best we can offer them in the CIP/CFP? This year moved it another year out which
is definitely unacceptable. Can we do any better than putting it back in 2026 where it was before this year's revision? I at least need to
get it back in 2026.
PW
A funding source is needed to move the project forward. The project was moved back to 2027, since the first 3 years of the plan are for
projects that have secured funding or at least funding that is reasonably expected to be secured.
62 VO
One was about need for sidewalk on 80th Ave between Seaview Park at 188th and OVD due to limited sight from hills, and people with
strollers commuting on foot from the park (in the street when it had been raining and the shoulder was muddy
PW
The 2015 Transportation Plan includes a walkway on 80th Ave from 188th St to OVD. Staff has submitted several grant applications for
this project, but none have scored high enough to receive funding. This project will be included in the evaluation of walkway projects
with the current Transportation Comprehensive Plan update.
63 VO
Another was asking about why in PWT-68 the sidewalk improvements were not being made in concrete? My guess is that much of the
existing is in okay shape and being left as is so rather than redoing whole project at much greater cost? Could you confirm this though?
If it is just (or close to) the upgrade cost to cement, we should look at that.
PW
The preliminary scope of work for sidewalk replacement is to install concrete vertical curb and asphalt concrete sidewalk to replace the
existing deteriorating asphalt concrete curb and sidewalk. Some sections of the sidewalk have been replaced with concrete sidewalk as
part of private development work. During the design phase, staff will evaluate the cost difference between concrete and asphalt
concrete sidewalk to determine if there is sufficient funding
64 VO
The other comment that person made was about PWT 17 (making it a complete streets approach adding a short sidewalk to the
Maplewood Hill park entrance).
PW
This segment of sidewalk can be added to the upcoming walkway evaluation as part of the Transportation Comprehensive Plan update.
65 DB
I have heard this for a number of years about Olympic view Drive in terms of the speeding, but also in terms of the pedestrian safety on
that intersection of OVD and 76 where we have the Edmonds parcels and then the one Lynnwood parcel? Is the state still giving out
grant money for roundabouts? Would it be feasible to do a small roundabout at that location or would it be difficult because of the
Lynnwood connection to that one parcel?
m
M
u_
M
Q
M
U
rn
N
O
N
le
N
O
N
a
0
a
M
N
O
N
O
O
•L
M
a
M
a
a
LL
U
I
U
a
rn
r
d
E
t
�a
w
a
0
E
a
Packet Pg. 282
6.2.i
# CM Question/Response
PW
As part of the 2024 Transportation Plan, this existing / future intersection delay / Level of Service (LOS) at this intersection will be
evaluated. For roadway projects with failing LOS (LOS E or LOS F in existing and / or out -years), the proposed improvements will be
identified (roundabout is definitely a possibility / has been identified as alternative solution as part of prior plans). Those projects will
then be ranked based on a set of different criteria. Considering this project will remain in the list of projects within the 2024
Transportation Plan (very good chance since existing LOS is LOS D), future grant applications could be submitted for this project.
Anytime a grant funding opportunity comes out, the City determines which project from the list is the best candidate for submitting a
grant application (not always the highest ranked project). Grant programs to improve intersection LOS and / or pedestrian safety
frequently come up at the State and Federal level. Communication with Lynnwood would also be needed since this intersection is
shared with Lynnwood.
Packet Pg. 283
6.2.j
Parks 2024-2029 Capital Program - Questions and Answers
Updated as of. November 7, 2023, New items in blue
Council-
Q&A member
(intial) Councilmember question or statement Staff response
Budget program revision (if applicable)
1
DT
P. 7 of six year fund overview: revenue is
Page 7 is a continuation of the table at the
shown as increasing by approx. $3m from
bottom of page 6. On page 6 the revenue
2026 to 2027. What is the source of this
breakdown shows the biggest difference is
additional $3m?
in "unsecured grants/funding". Specifically
there is a large project programmed in
2027 which will require securing extra
funding. The source of the funding is not
yet determined, as is the case with most
large projects in out years. This specific
project is the construction of a new
Parks/Facilities maintenance shop. In
absence of funding, this project will likely
continue to be bumped farther out in the
schedule. As a reminder, the CIP/CFP is a
planning document and not a budget
document. It is important to list projects
without funding to remain eligible for
funding and keep on the planning horizon.
Page 1
Packet Pg. 284
6.2.j
2
DT
R-19: the narrative states "...erosion within
(A) A study on the entire length of Shell
(1319)
Yost Park may impact spawning habitat."
Creek within Yost Park is staff's
Shell Creek Restoration
Please revise to state "...within Yost Park
recommended next step. This will help
*rAIR ovFnR�NAIR D*
that impacts spawning habitat." Also, the
identify sources of erosion, more
Stream health and erosion control of Shell
narrative states "near term actions are
effeciently prepare and submit for
Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based on
needed to address severe erosion issues in
necessary permits for any project in the
study. Study in 2024, work in 2025. Funding
the creek." We agree. However, waiting
stream corridor including the weirs, bridges
for 2024 TBD.
until 2025 to begin remediation is a missed
and trails for the entire length of the
opportunity. Please consider updating this
stream. It will also determine if the weir
item to, at a minimum, reflect removal of
removal is the highest priority and best
the two concrete weirs in 2024 as a
course of action for long-term stream
proactive step toward minimizing
health. Staff's professional opinion is the
continued severe erosion and destruction
most fiscally responsible approach is to
of salmon spawning habitat.
study the stream bed as a whole which
would then enable all necessary projects
(bridge replacement, trail enhancements,
weir removal) to begin the over- and in -
water repair work (and required permits)
as prioritized by the study.
(B) The Study is not currently funded due to
a recent hold on all remaining 2023
unspent ARPA funded projects.
0
d
r
U_
Q
M
U
rn
N
0
N
4
N
0
N
Q.
0
Q
0
0
ri
N
0
N
X
a
c
0
Cl
r
.Q
0
U
Y
L
M
IL
.r
a
Page 2 Packet Pg. 285
6.2.j
2B
Council
Item: R19 (p. 12): Shell Creek Restoration
Staff recommendation is to eliminate R9
(R19)
Proposed change: This item requests
tennis court resurfacing (project with Public
Shell Creek Restoration
approx.. $500k in funding for 2024 and
Works in 2025), move R4 trail, bridge and
*PARRVFO- RIMARW
2025 to study and remediate erosion
boardwalk repair to R19 and add REET
Stream health and erosion control of shell
problems in Shell Creek within Yost Park.
funds to allocate $250,000 for an Existing
Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based on
$120k of that amount is programmed for
Conditions Analysis of the entire length of
study. Study existing condition analysis in
2024 for a professional study of this issue,
Shell Creek in Yost Park.
2024. Design, permitting and construction
with $380k programmed in 2025 for actual
work in 2025.
remediation work. However, apparently
$ 74,300 R9 Tennis Court surfacing
direction has been given by the
$ 80,000 R4 Yost trail and bridges repair
(R9, R4, R6, R11)
Administration to remove the ARPA
Yost Park & Pool
funding for 2024 for the professional study.
95,700 REET funding
Park enhancements, repair and
Council does not agree with this, and
$250,000
maintenance to include re -surface ^f *^^^
wishes the $120k to remain in this DP as it
,
is currently shown. Further, please revise
..S�Feplaeement On 2Q24
the project summary narrative to state
playground and pool upgrades in 2025.
"...stream silting issues caused by erosion
within Yost Park impact salmon spawning
(See Parks CIP/CFP Amendments as of
habitat" rather than "...stream silting issues
11/8/2023 for full revisions)
caused by erosion within Yost Park may
impact salmon spawning habitat." Impact
Project narrative (page 12 of the Parks
on other projects: Council will vote in its
CIP/CFP) was significantly revised to reflect
2024 budget deliberation on how to
proposed changes of the Analysis and
preserve $120k in funding for the
restoration work.
professional study of the critical erosion
issues within Yost Park. Until Concil holds
that vote, funding should continue to be
shown in this item for 2024.
a
Page 3 Packet Pg. 286
6.2.j
2C
DB
R19 Shell Creek Restoration and DP 82
The CIP/CFP listed R19 as $120,000 funded
See above
- What is the total 2024 number?
by ARPA and a carryforward from 2023.
However, after the CIP/CFP was drafted,
The CIP has the $120 carryforward
ARPA funds were paused and no longer
from 2023 but yet, DP 82 has $154,300
available. The corresponding DP was not
and both seem to address Yost which if
advanced in the Mayor's budget due to lack
you read the CFP, some of the DP is
of funding.
captured in the text regarding second
phase. Please reconcile this amount
for us in addition to answering Dave
Tetzel's questions.
3
DT
R-7: the project summary doesn't describe
R7 is the renovation of the existing
(117) Olympic Beach Park Renewatien ^F
what work is being done. Please expand to
restroom. The scope of work specifics will
a)(siting FestFeemsReplacement of failed
state the scope of work.
be determined closer to permitting and
ventilation system in coordination with
bidding process. Typically, this includes
roof replacement (by PW - Facilties).
improvments such as ADA compliance,
replacement of fixtures, partitions,
ventilation systems , etc.
3B
DT
Item: R7 ( p 14)—Olympic Beach Park
CIP/CFP amendment motion passed during
Moved one year earlier in CIP/CFP to 2024
(fishing pier restroom) Proposed change:
11/6/2023 Council meeting
(design/permit) and 2025 (construction).
This item requests approx. $53k for
renovation of the fishing pier restroom.
However, this project has been moved
from 2024 back to 2025. Funding is fully
secured via REET Fund 125. This restroom is
heavily used by visitors to Olympic Beach
and the fishing pier, and it is in strong need
of renovation. Please move this item up to
begin in 2024..
0
2
r
LL
Q.
M
U
0
N
0
N
It
N
0
N
Q.
0
Q
0
0
M
N
0
N
x
a
c
0
Cl
0
U
Y
L
0
IL
.r
a
Page 4 Packet Pg. 287
6.2.j
4
DT
D-20: I recall, when the Woodway Campus
This project will have community outreach
athletic fields were built in approx. 2015,
and require a conditional use permit. To
there was discussion of installing field
meet the increased demand for athletic
lighting. However, the residents living near
field opportunities, it is more feasible to
the field complained loudly that lighting
light existing fields rather than building
would be very intrusive, and the plan to
new ones. This athletic field complex is
add field lighting was shelved. Has
significantly underutlized most of the year
outreach been done to the residents living
due to only being accessible a few hours
near the field to resolve their concerns?
after school until dark. As demontrated at
Civic Field, modern lighting technology is
very efficient, direct and limited to the
playing field.
5
DT
P2, D-13: will this project item be updated
Yes, if a park is purchased in 2024, the goal
if potential park/open space in SE Edmonds
of the current plan would be to Master
comes to fruition in 2024? The expense
Plan the Park in 2025 and renovate in 2026.
matrix shows expenditures in 2025 and
The extend of the planning and
2026.
improvements to provide access
determined by the site conditions of the
purchase.
6
DT
P3 and D14: the estimated construction
This estimate was developed as part of the
costs for the Ebb Tide walkway seems
feasibility process. The walkway has yet to
extremely low. Please review this estimate
be fully designed and there is still potential
and update as appropriate.
to work with the Ebb Tide. As such, it is too
premature to pay for an engineers estimate
for the project. The CIP/CFP is a planning
document creating placeholders for
projects up to six years on the horizon. This
projects funding is unsecured and will likely
require grant funding.
.r
a
Page 5 Packet Pg. 288
6.2.j
7
DT
R-16: the city installed an ADA-compliant
When the playground at Seaview Park
The Parks & Planning Board suggested
playground at Seaview Park in approx.
when the playground was built, pathway
moving the 2028 restroom ADA compliance
2018. However, access by kids in
improvements were made made. It is
project to be a year or two earlier.
wheelchairs is very difficult. In the project
recognized, even with access from 184th
justification for this item, the narrative
and 185th which are more direct than the
states "..make improvements to existing
parking lot, there is opportunity for an
parks as needed to ensure proper
enhanced approached to the playground.
maintenance, usability and quality of park
This project is being considered in the 2024
features and grounds...." Requiring kids in
city-wide improvement project list. In
wheelchairs to travel across a grass field to
addition, the draft CIP/CFP does list a 2028
access the playground equipment means
improvement to replace the existing
that playground is not as usable as is
restroom (adjacent to the playground) to
necessary. Please revise this item to show
provide ADA complicance.
improvements to access to the play
equipment.
As a point of clarification, the three points
of access to the playground are all on
paved surfaces and do not require children
to travel across grass to reach the
playground.
8
DT
R-10: please specify in the project summary
The "dog prohibited" signs are scheduled to
that updated signage will include
be installed this year, so excluded from the
prominent signage at Brackett's Landing
2024 R-10 "Signage & Wayfinding" project.
North that dogs are not allowed anywhere
in that park, per the recent ordinance
approved by Council.
9
VO
Trash can and Service for trash pickup at
OPERATING BUDGET
SW county park by county or ILA with
This would be a new program and would
Snohomish county for us to be able to have
require Council direction through a vote -
a can there (city code says trash can at all
either requesting the County to provide
parks in edmonds)
trash service or trash can service provided
by City of Edmonds. Staff will need more
direction to determine the level of service
impacts to other city parks if Edmonds
were to perform this service.
0
d
r
U_
.Q
c�
tU
rn
N
O
N
4
N
O
N
.r
Q.
0
Q
0
0
ri
N
O
N
X
a
c
0
Cl
r
.Q
0
U
Y
a
a
Page 6 Packet Pg. 289
6.2.j
10 1 VO (Volunteer coordinator
11A I VO
11B I VO
Parks and Rec kiosk for renting paddle
boards and kayaks at Lake Ballinger
VO follow-up (10/26/2023)
"I was referring to the Lake Ballinger
(Edmonds side) boat launch when I made
the inquiry about having paddle boards
available to rent (like you have at Marina
beach).
OPERATING BUDGET
This is a general fund expense proposed in
the 2023 budget as a part time position for
$42,249 per year. Staff supports the
addition of this position.
OPERATING BUDGET
Clarification needed - hand -carry rental
kiosk at the City of Edmonds Lake Ballinger
access at McAleer Street or on Lake
Ballinger through City of Mountlake
Terrace?
OPERATING BUDGET
The kayak rental service at Marina Beach
Park is provided through a vendor using a
Request for Proposals (RFP) process.
Vendors typically approach the city and
submit through the RFP process based on
their desire to locate their concessionaire
It doesn't take much room, only seasonal Iservices at a particular park. The city has
and no permanent fixtures. I know there
are grant related restrictions but with the
above characteristics it seems like it should
be okay. Would it be worth trying?
Wouldn't they just tell us to stop if the
grantors had a problem with it?"
not been approached to provide rental
services at the McAleer Access (Lake
Ballinger/Edmonds side).
Page 7 Packet Pg. 290
6.2.j
12
VO
Overhead signage and art at Bracketts
Dogs prohibited signs are in process this
landing to include Signage for marine
year, the 2024 Signage and Wayfinding
sanctuary and no dogs
project in the CIP will address additional
park signage. Art installation is lead by the
Cultural Arts Division in the Cultural and
Arts Services and Economic Development
Department.
13
VO
Safety lighting in areas we have been made
This is a Public Works department project
aware they are needed including by
and it is listed in the PW CIP/CFP as a
interurban trail
lighting study as a first step.
14
VO
Where is funding for lighting near
See above.
interurban trail?
15
VO
improvements to Yost pool in 2025 are
The pool will require a full tank replastering
over 1M- should we make this investment
project in 2025 (the last few were patches)
without knowing outcome of decision Re
and that will take a majority of the $1M. If
landmark and possible aquatics center?
the re -plastering is not completed, the pool
(Yost replacement decision for another
is no longer operational. There will be
24M is in 2029)
additional information about the Landmark
99 project in 2024 that will available to
inform the 2025 pool expenditures.
16
VO
Do the dollars look right for Yost
There are two projects that impact this
considering the work needed there
park, Project R19 which is the Shell Creek
Restoration Project and the Yost Park &
Pool Project (119, R4, R6 and R11). Without
completing a Stream Study, it is difficult to
determine all expenses until projects are
identified.
a
Page 8 Packet Pg. 291
6.2.j
17
VO
Moving the playfield lighting project to
This project will require planning,
2027 from 2026 is disappointing. Any
community engagement, design and
option to move back?
coordination with the Edmonds School
District (which will more than likely manage
the construction). Currently, funding is
unsecured. RCO grant funding cycle is every
two years, so application in 2026 and if
successful, funds available in 2027 for
construction.
18
VO
Elm street playground - residents have
Yes, revision to the to the description of
(D16, D17, R14)
asked for it to be a dog park. Where did the
the Elm Street renovation in the final
Elm Street Park
specific improvements for this park (per the
version of the CIP/CFP will note
Park enhancements to include the addition
CIP/CFP) come from? Can the desires of the
consideration of a potential dog park
of a natural playground, small shelter with
local community for one amenity versus
amenity (with public engagement).
picnic tables, a+�d habitat restoration, and
the other be verified before proceeding?
consideration of a dog park amenity with
public design process.
19
VO
We have a lot of professional services
Professional services encompass
associated with deferred park maintenance
contracted work such as tree abortist
projects now that we have full time parks
services, on -call maintenance services, as
capital project manager (150k per year)?
well as engineering, design, site surveys,
geotech testing, etc. These services are
necessary to provide required materials for
project permits.
20
VO
Is this the same amount as in past years
This is actually an increase (previously $50K
before we had this position?
for both professional services and materials
and equipment). With the Parks Capital
Project Manager we are able to perform
work that requires professional services
and contractors to complete major
maintenance projects that the parks
maintenance crew does not skills or time
capacity to do.
0
d
r
U_
Q
M
U
rn
N
0
N
It
N
0
N
r.,
CL
0
Q
0
0
ri
N
0
N
X
a
c
0
Cl
r
.Q
0
U
Y
E
IL
a
Page 9 Packet Pg. 292
6.2.j
21
VO
Where are the Landmark and green belt
The entire Landmark 99 project is not a
proposals?
parks capital project. However, there are
park capital projects such as parkland
acquisition, design and improvements as
well as Interurban Trail expansion which
could be part of the Landmark 99 project.
Assuming the "green belt" proposal being
referred to is the Edmonds Greenway Loop,
that is not a project that is found in the
Parks CIP/CFP, but either in Planning &
Community Development (during project
development) or Public Works (Street
improvements)
22
VO
I am noting that the Interurban trail
Correct, the acquisition of easements or
expansion is being put off to 2029 from
property to expand the Interurban trail is
2028 even without adding the trails from
long-term planning and identified as a
green belt idea
potential future project. At this time, that
project is unfunded and may need grant
funding to complete.
0
d
r
U_
Q
M
U
rn
N
0
N
It
N
0
N
Q.
0
Q
0
0
ri
N
0
N
X
a
c
0
Cl
r
.Q
0
U
Y
L
a
.r
a
Page 10 Packet Pg. 293
6.2.j
P3 and D14 Ebb Tide Section - remove
Voted on by Council at 11/6/2023 meeting.
entirely
Motion did not pass.
We have spent probably more than a million
in attorney's fees on this project that we
know will never happened because of
environmental issues and/or costs and/or
23
DB
equity issues that the money should be sent
elsewhere and/or we have a work -around
where the sidewalk between the two
buildings can be painted or highlighted to
afford those that need the ADA access can
move easily on the East side of the three
parcels and connect again at Olympic
Beach.
Add Interlocal Agreement with Snohomish
OPERATING BUDGET
County for Esperance Park for animal
control and park maintenance (grass
Animal control services are managed by the
cutting) I realize that we are very short of
Edmonds Police Department and this
funding for new positions, but we could
engage in workforce help via animal control
request for services outside of the city
for their dog park (which is heavily used by
limits needs to be answered by EPD.
Edmonds citizens) and grass cutting or
minor assistance since we are leasing a
Performing parks maintenance tasks
place up there for the highway 99 area.
outside of the City of Edmonds park system
24
DB
Again, lots of Edmonds Citizens use this
will require a decrease in levels of service
park, heavily.
for existing Edmonds parks and facilitites.
As guidance for the Interlocal Agreement,
please provide what maintenance services
would be provided at Esperance Park and
related estimated number of annual hours
per service. In addition, please suggest
what Edmonds parks will have decreased
levels of service.
0
d
r
U_
Q
M
tU
rn
N
0
N
It
N
0
N
r.,
Q.
0
Q
0
0
ri
N
0
N
X
a
c
0
Cl
'a
0
U
Y
L
0
IL
a
Page 11 Packet Pg. 294
6.2.k
c
M
a
as
2024-2029 CFP-CIP
Amendments
LL
1
.Q
CFP-CIP
Amendments
N
0
N
Project
2024 2029
N
Item
CFP CIP
+,
No.
No.
Project
DP#
Action
Change
0
1
PWT-32
84th Ave Walkway (238th St — 234th St)
New
Program $75k in 2024 for Pre -design and Construction in 2025
Yes
a
2
PWT-39
Citywide Bicycle Improvement Project
78
Revise narrative to clarify staff has assumed grant funds will be
Yes
M
LO
spent in 2023.
o
N
3
PWT-44
Downtown Lighting Improvements
N/A
Delete project from CFP-CIP
Yes
r"
w
4
PWT-45
SR104/Pine St Walkway
N/A
Move expenditures/unsecured funds to 2029
Yes
c
(SR104 to Pine St & Pine St-9th Ave)
Green Streets 236th St
a
5
PWT-64
th
(84 Ave — Hwy 99)
N/A
Move expenditures/unsecured funds to 2029
Yes
a.
3
Add $20k in 2024 budget to upgrade existing restroom to
CL
U_
6
PWF-10
Historical Museum
New
meet ADA compliance
Yes
3:
7
PWT-50
238th St. SW Walkway
N/A
Move expenditures/unsecured funds to 2027 (design) and
Yes
a
th
(Hwy99 — 76 Ave)
2028 (construction)
T"
a�
E
0T,dL
fC
rt+
Q
CEO
t
t�
w
w
Q
Packet Pg. 295
2024-2029 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
6.2.1
Parks CIP/CFP Amendments as of 111812023
Project
CFP
Project Site & Description
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
6-Year Tot
Shell Creek Restoration * *
R19
Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based
$gin 099
$ 380,000
$
$
$
$
$ 630,0(
on study. Study existing condition analysis in 2024. Design, permitting and
$ 250,000
-
-
-
-
construction work in 2025.
A9
Yost Park & Pool
R4
Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include resurface of tenRis courts
rd trail bridge h r rs/reps -, rnp..t i.. ?n?n ,,G'us",,
r 154,3A0
$ 1,296,400
$
$
$
$
$ 1,296,4(
R6
@Rd arrtwalk
R11
playground and pool upgrades in 2025.
Olympic Beach Park
$ 28 Qgg
R7
ReRE)Vat'^^ of ^)('St'^^ restFoams. Replacement of failed ventilation system in
$ 20,000
93,000
$
$
$
$ 53,0(
$ 33,000
coordination with roof replacement (by Facilities/PW)
Elm Street Park
D1 6
Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground,
D1
$
$
$
$
$ 100,000
$ 340,370
$ 440,3;
small shelter with picnic tables a -Rd habitat restoration, and consideration of a
R14
dog park amenity with public design process.
Q
Packet Pg. 296
6.2.m
TEITZEL CIP/CFP AMENDMENTS
Item: PWT-32 (P. 43): 84" Ave walkway from 2381h SW to 2341h SW
Proposed change:
The estimated project cost for this project is $1.5 million. Please revise this project to show design in
2024 with construction in 2025 (rather than 2027), with $750k in secured funding being transferred from
PWT-69 and the remaining $750k funded by ARPA funds.
Impact on other projects:
Requires $750k of new funding to be identified for design/completion of the 7th Ave walkway (PWT 69)
Item: PWT-39 (P. 49)—Citywide bicycle lanes
Proposed change:
The estimated project cost for the citywide bike lane project is $3 million. Yet, there is no discussion
about this project being grant funded by a Sound Transit grant. Rather, it shows $15k in 2024
construction cost, to be funded by REET revenue. Please either revise this item to show the $15k cost
funded by the Sound Transit grant with zero impact to REET, or explain that the entire $3 million was
spent in 2023 and the $15k is residual cost that must be covered by city funds.
Impact on other projects:
N/A
Item PWT-44 (p. 53)—Downtown Lighting Improvements
Proposed change:
This item requests approx. $1.6m in unsecured funding to install additional street lighting in downtown
Edmonds in 2027 and 2028. The narrative does not provide sufficient justification for this investment.
Please delete PWT-44 and reserve this funding for more urgent lighting improvements in other parts of
Edmonds (such as Matthay Ballinger Park, the Interurban Trail, the north Edmonds/Meadowdale area,
etc). If additional downtown lighting is determined to be needed, this request can be resubmitted at a
later time with appropriate justification.
Impact on other projects:
This change frees up $1.6m in city resources for more urgent lighting improvements in Edmonds
Packet Pg. 297
6.2.m
Item PWT-45 (p. 54)—SR 104 walkway on Pine St. to 9th
Proposed change:
This item requests funding of $3.3 million for a new walkway with ADA-complaint curb ramps on Pine St.
from SR 104 to 9th Ave. While a worthy concept, there are areas in Edmonds with no sidewalks at all
(Pine St. already has sidewalks along most of its length from 9th Ave to SR 104). Also, the narrative for
this item does not indicate its priority ranking. Please move this entire funding request back to 2029 until
it can be ranked in priority order with other funding needs for sidewalks in Edmonds.
Impact on other projects:
This change frees up $3.3 million for use earlier in the planning period for other sidewalk priorities.
Item: PWT-50 (p. 59)—sidewalk from 238th SW from SR 99 to 76th Ave W
Proposed change:
The estimated project cost for this project is $1.4 million, and is scheduled for the 2030-2044 time
frame. It is ranked #10 in the long walkway priority list in the most recent Transportation Plan. Please
move the schedule for this project up to begin in 2025. The Highway 99 subarea is undergoing
redevelopment, this route is one of the primary walking/biking routes for residents of SE Edmonds to
transit and amenities on SR 99, is a major walking/biking route to the soon -to -be improved Mathay
Ballinger Park and will be a major walking/biking route to the new Edmonds access to the Ballinger Park.
It is a dangerous walking route with insufficient or non-existent sidewalks and needs to be reprioritized
for sooner sidewalk construction.
Impact on other projects:
Will require reprioritization of funding for capital projects elsewhere in Edmonds.
Item: PWT-69 (p. 63)-7th Ave sidewalk project
Proposed change:
This item requests $750k in funding, and has now been advanced in the 2024 city budget to occur in
2024. The full $750k in funding has now been secured by Public Works from existing sources. Please
remove the secured funding for this project and transfer it to PWT-32 (84th Ave. walkway from 238th St.
SW to 230 St. SW). This project may stay in the CIP/CFP as it is currently shown, with design scheduled
for 2027 and construction in 2028, with funding shown as "unsecured"
Impact on other projects:
Transfers secured funding of $750k to PWT-32 for 2024 construction costs of that project.
Packet Pg. 298
6.2.m
Item: PWT-51 (p 65)—ferry storage improvements from Pine St. to Dayton St
Proposed change:
This item requests $380k in unsecured funding to add vehicle storage for ferry users. However, this
project involves restriping of a section of SR-104: a state highway. This project should not be shown as
suggesting funding is a city obligation. Rather, it is a WSDOT obligation. Please modify this item to either
show the funding source as a state grant or remove this item entirely from the CIP/CFP.
Impact on other projects:
Removes $380k from city funding obligations for 2027 so this funding can be dedicated to other city
purposes.
Item: PWT-64 (p. 72)—Green Streets 236th SW
Proposed change:
This item requests approx.. $3.5 million in funding for a green street project on 236th St. SW, with design
beginning in 2025. This is premature and dedicates scarce city resources to a project that should take
lower priority in favor of other high priority sidewalk installation projects. Please move funding for this
project back to the 2030 category, with funding shown as "unsecured"
Impact on other projects:
Frees up $3.5 million for other high priority city sidewalk projects requiring investment in 2025 and
2026.
Item: PWF-10 (p. 112): Historical Museum
Proposed change:
This item requests approx.. $75k in funding from 2024 through 2028 for upgrades and maintenance of
the Edmonds museum building. However, there is no reference to the need for upgrades to the only
restroom in the building to be ADA complaint (which it currently is not). Please add $20k in 2024
(showing as "unsecured funding" pending identification by Council of funding sources) in funding for this
item to upgrade the restroom to bring it into ADA compliance.
Impact on other projects:
Requires identification of 2024 funding source for the additional $20k cost.
3
Packet Pg. 299
6.2.m
Item: R19 (p. 12): Shell Creek Restoration
Proposed change:
This item requests approx.. $500k in funding for 2024 and 2025 to study and remediate erosion
problems in Shell Creek within Yost Park. $120k of that amount is programmed for 2024 for a
professional study of this issue, with $380k programmed in 2025 for actual remediation work. However,
apparently direction has been given by the Administration to remove the ARPA funding for 2024 for the
professional study. Council does not agree with this, and wishes the $120k to remain in this DP as it is
currently shown. Further, please revise the project summary narrative to state "...stream silting issues
caused by erosion within Yost Park impact salmon spawning habitat" rather than "...stream silting issues
caused by erosion within Yost Park may impact salmon spawning habitat."
Impact on other projects:
Council will vote in its 2024 budget deliberation on how to preserve $120k in funding for the
professional study of the critical erosion issues within Yost Park. Until Concil holds that vote, funding
should continue to be shown in this item for 2024.
Item: R7 ( p 14)—Olympic Beach Park (fishing pier restroom)
Proposed change:
This item requests approx. $53k for renovation of the fishing pier restroom. However, this project has
been moved from 2024 back to 2025. Funding is fully secured via REET Fund 125. This restroom is
heavily used by visitors to Olympic Beach and the fishing pier, and it is in strong need of renovation.
Please move this item up to begin in 2024..
Impact on other projects:
n/a
2
Packet Pg. 300
6.2.n
1. Bond maintenance projects.
A big issue that seems to have fallen through the cracks is how many of projects in 2023
and then in 2024 will qualify for the bond maintenance ordinance? Last year (May 2023)
you gave CM Chen and I over $1.2MM in repairs that would qualify? Dave Turley says none
of the bond money has been used since issuance in 2121? Please help us understand this
issue on this issue and has your total costs of items on your list since last year
increased? In DP 63, it appears that $660K was a total given that would quality - is this
accurate reflection or is there more?
2.
3. PWT-64 Green Streets - remove entirely
I am recommending removing this entire PWT as it is not only premature but we have no
code. I have consistently asked for code since Green Streets appeared in the budget in
2121 and have been ignored. Instead an expense "manual" was created" to provide
examples of Green Streets but manual are not code and enforcement cannot happen. We
have heard consistentlyto have more sidewalks and that is a lot of money (regardless if
partially funded by grants) and Council must START looking at the costs to our taxpayer's
utility rates for expensive projects like this one.
3. P3 and D14 Ebb Tide Section -remove entirely
We have spent probably more than a million in attorney's fees on this project that we know
will never happened because of environmental issues and/or costs and/or equity issues
that the money should be sent elsewhere and/or we have a work -around where the
sidewalk between the two buildings can be painted or highlighted to afford those that need
the ADA access can move easily on the East side of the three parcels and connect again at
Olympic Beach.
4. R19 Shell Creek Restoration and DP 82 -What is the total 2024 number?
The CIP has the $120 carryforward from 2023 but yet, DP 82 has $154,300 -and both seem
to address Yost which if you read the CFP, some of the DP is captured in the text regarding
second phase. Please reconcile this amount for us in addition to answering Dave Tetzel's
questions.
5. PWT 67 and DP 83 Waterfront Emergency- is this a carryforward?
These funds are coming from REET or so the DP states. Why would this not come from
Transportation Impact fees?
Packet Pg. 301
6.2.n
6. PWT 32 - 8411 AVE walkway- move timeline up to 2024-2025
We have heard a lot about this busy street and the lack of sidewalks or having sidewalks on
the wrong side of the street away from bus stop? Let's try and get this right and I know for a
while the sidewalk issue was going to be picked up by the developer - which fell through.
7. PWP 02 Carbon Recovery Project -reject this cost to complete as is this not an all-
inclusive build?
This entire project is becoming clearly a expensive mess and Council is not up to date
about the all -in contract that was approved. If we need to have an executive session on
this fine, but I cannot believe the amount of time and costs we have spent on this
project and it's just now being operational. Also, was there not a management fee
included? This is all too confusing to me and the City of Edmonds' utility ratepayers should
not be required to pay for their errors.
8. R7 Olympic Beach Park - move entire $53K to 2024
We have heard numerous complaints regarding this restroom both from citizens and the
Port. There is no reason why this project cannot be prioritized to accommodate getting
both the planning and construction done in one year.
9. Add InterlocalAgreement with Snohomish County for Esperance Park for animal
control and park maintenance (grass cutting)
Packet Pg. 302
6.2.0
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
OVERVIEW
Packet Pg. 303
6.2.0
TABLE OF CONTENT
CapitalImprovement Program Purpose............................................................................................................................3
Introduction.......................................................................................................................................................................3
CapitalPlanning Policies....................................................................................................................................................3
AssetPreservation.........................................................................................................................................................4
Project Cost Estimate Review and Validation Process...................................................................................................5
Capital Improvement Program Funding.............................................................................................................................5
DebtFinancing...............................................................................................................................................................5
Public Utility Funding (Enterprise Funds).......................................................................................................................6
RealEstate Excise Tax (REET).........................................................................................................................................6
Edmonds's Recent History — New Revenue Sources and Debt Finance.........................................................................6
NewRevenue Sources...............................................................................................................................................6
DebtFinancing...........................................................................................................................................................7
Funding Dynamics for Significant Future Capital Projects.................................................................................................7
PublicSafety Facilities....................................................................................................................................................7
Transportation...............................................................................................................................................................7
Projects......................................................................................................................................................................8
Utilities...........................................................................................................................................................................8
CurrentProjects.........................................................................................................................................................9
2024-2029 Proposed Capital Improvement Program Summary......................................................................................10
2024-2029 Proposed CIP by Department....................................................................................................................10
Background of Capital Improvement Program Policy Drivers.........................................................................................11
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan.........................................................................................................................11
UtilitiesMaster Plans...................................................................................................................................................11
Comprehensive Transportation Plan...........................................................................................................................11
Federal and State Regulatory Requirements...............................................................................................................12
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan.................................................................................................12
ClimateAction Plan......................................................................................................................................................13
Packet Pg. 304
6.2.0
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a six -year financial planning tool that identifies future capital
investments and potential strategies for funding those investments. The CIP also satisfies various
requirements of city planning under Washington State's Growth Management Act.
The City of Edmonds owns and operates a variety of physical assets, ranging from community parks,
roadways, and public facilities including, City Hall a library building, fire stations, maintenance yard
and wastewater treatment plant, utilities infrastructure and more. The City must properly maintain
these assets to ensure they are safe, lasting, and provide a welcoming and usable space to serve their
intended purposes. The City's capital infrastructure supports City operations, direct public services
and programs, and in some cases, provides direct public benefits themselves.
Every year during the annual budget process, the city adopts a six -year CIP, which outlines anticipated
investments over that timeframe. The 2024-2029 Proposed CIP totals $301.7 million over six years,
with approximately $22.1 million of that amount designated for the 2024 budget year.
CAPITAL PLANNING POLICIES
The City has historically based capital planning efforts on a set of criteria that help set priorities
among potential capital programs. Each department has its own policies to prioritize projects based
on Council Priorities and specific department needs. Specifically for public works, Facilities,
Transportation and Utility infrastructure the department utilizes a number of planning documents
including the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Comprehensive Water System Plan,
Comprehensive Sewer Plan, Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan and Facilities condition
assessment, other planning documents include the ADA transition plan.
For the Public Infrastructure Public works primary goal is to protect the city's investment by
maintaining its assets and investing at the right time. Most capital assets when properly maintained
can continue to provide a high level of service throughout their life, but if not maintained it can turn
into the proverbial money pit, in which minimum investment reduces the level of service and require
higher cost to bring back to adequate level of service.
The criteria used to prioritize projects include:
• Risk to Health, Safety and Environment and Regulatory or Mandated Requirement
• Asset Condition, Annual Recurring Costs and Asset Longevity
• Level and Quality of Service
• Sustainability and Conservation
• Funding Availability
• Project Readiness
Packet Pg. 305
6.2.0
Multiple Category Benefit and Bundling Opportunities
Preserve and maintain existing Capital Assets
Support the goals of the City's Plans
Support Economic Development
Seek regional funding for Regional Projects
Pursue cost -saving commitments; and,
Pursue conservation and sustainability investments.
ASSET PRESERVATION
Legend
2022 Pavement Condition
70-65
i 60 - 70
50-60
40-50
>5-40
0 - '5
Network Average 66
tTy
"NNWOOD
T�
',_._
I
d
r
MOUNTLAKE
Y TERRACE
10x..W
,
1 �
1
W.r
Asset Preservation studies are required for
all utilities, the city also completes these
for facilities and pavement system. The
studies include analysis to determine the
condition of the asset and predict the
level of deterioration of all systems. This
results in the recommended level of
investment on preservation efforts and in
some cases the replacement schedule for
an asset.
4
Packet Pg. 306
6.2.0
As result of facilities condition assessment, the council approved a bond to invest in the backlog of
facilities maintenance and is expected that it will take 2-3 years to complete recommended projects.
The utilities teams continuously rate the infrastructure, for example the operations team perform
video inspection of sewer and storm drainpipes and rates those to update the on -going annual
replacement program and performs leak detection of the water system to identify what pipes are
failing and plan for the repair or replacement. The team also tracks age of all systems and failures to
determine what must be replaced to prevent emergency repair and higher costs.
The pavement preservation program is completed every other year and provides the condition of our
network and generates the recommended investment to maintain our network in a safe and reliable
condition. The most current Pavement Condition Index (PCI).
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE REVIEW AND VALIDATION PROCESS
Estimated cost for CIP is a difficult process that requires extensive due diligence to adequately reflect
the expected cost of a project. The first year is the most accurate while years 2-3 can be costs based
on conceptual or early designs and years 4-6 can be only a rough order of magnitude based on
conceptual design or other engineering knowledge of similar project costs in our area.
In general, as projects get closer to construction the estimates improve as designs get finalized and
estimates include the most recent cost factors that can affect a project.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDING
Like all municipalities, Edmonds relies on a variety of sources to pay for capital projects. These
include locally generated revenues (taxes, fees, voter -approved levies, utility rates, and user fees),
intergovernmental revenues (including state and federal grants), private funding (franchise utilities,
philanthropy) and debt issuance. These traditional sources continue to provide the majority of
funding for capital facility investments. The City's level of capital investment is based on the mix and
amount of financial resources available to the City.
DEBT FINANCING
For public works projects the city traditionally has used debt finance only for projects that are not
part of the normal maintenance or planned replacement program. These projects include high -cost
projects or programs to meet new regulatory requirements or projects that require significant
investment and new or unexpected needs, examples of this are the replacement of the incinerator at
the wastewater treatment plant and the seismic upgrades to the Yost and Seaview water reservoirs,
in both cases the debt payment is built into the utility rate fees. Other financed projects must be
repaid from the same limited resources used to fund the operation and maintenance of the specific
infrastructure, for example facilities maintenance projects use the same general fund sources to pay
that debt.
Packet Pg. 307
6.2.0
PUBLIC UTILITY FUNDING (ENTERPRISE FUNDS)
Edmonds Water, Wastewater and Storm drain projects are funded with revenues from utility rates
(Enterprise Funds). Each utility is in the process of drafting, and eventually adopting, formal financial
policies that determine what share of their capital investments are funded through cash, and what
share from debt. Currently, the annual utility upgrades, maintenance and replacement projects are
financed through cash since this annual investment needs to be made in perpetuity. This provides a
measured process to ensure long term system reliability for the respective utility and at the same
time helps decrease the volatility of utility rate increases due to inflationary factors and decreases in
maintenance and upkeep levels. Large projects like the reservoir improvements or the replacement
of the incinerator at the WWTP will be financed from debt.
REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX (REET)
Funding of the City's general government capital program is highly dependent on revenue from Real
Estate Excise Tax, which is an excise tax imposed on the sale of real property. REET is a relatively
volatile revenue source that generally tracks closely to local economic activity.
REET funds are shared between Public Works and Parks, Public Works uses these primarily to fund the
pavement preservation program.
In addition to fuel tax and general funds, REET revenue has been a significant source to fund the
pavement preservation program. Over the last few years general fund contributions have declined,
causing the pavement preservation program to invest only a fraction of what is recommended. The
effects of reduced preservation efforts are not immediately evident, but the City is starting to see
those impacts in current pavement condition index, declining from mid-70's to mid-60's.
EDMONDS'S RECENT HISTORY — NEW REVENUE SOURCES AND DEBT FINANCE
In addition to reliance upon general tax sources, Edmonds has recently taken major capital projects
that required debt finance. Projects include improvements to Civic Field, construction of a new
system to replace the incinerator at the wastewater treatment plant, and facilities backlog of
maintenance and repair needs. The following is a list recent funding sources that contribute to the
CIP and projects that are expected to be financed with debt.
NEW REVENUE SOURCES
• Vehicle tab fees: The vehicle tab fee was increased from $20 to $40; this provides for
approximately $700K increase per year that is used to fund the in-house maintenance and
preservation efforts of our street infrastructure, this increase is a welcome revenue to keep up
with the costs of growth of our infrastructure and systems and increased salaries, materials, and
equipment costs. While it is not directly contributing to our annual pavement preservation
program it provides some relief by providing ongoing maintenance and repair and preventing
Packet Pg. 308
6.2.0
significant degradation of our roadway infrastructure. As our preservation program continues to
struggle with adequate funding it is critical that funding for our in-house crews is available, the
less invested in preservation the more the city will have to invest in frequent calls for repairs.
• Utility Rate Fees: Utilities rates studies are completed every three years to keep up with the cost
of inflation, regulatory requirements, and infrastructure repair or replacement needs. During the
last four years the average increase has been 4.37% for water, 5% for Storm drain and 8.12% for
Sewer.
DEBT FINANCING
• Reservoir Improvements: It is expected that debt finance will be required for the repairs and
improvements necessary for this project.
• Nutrient Removal (WWTP): This is a long-term project that will require significant changes to the
treatment process and will require debt financing.
Given general resource funding challenges, the City will continue to rely on mix of general
government resources, grants, and debt funding packages to complete major capital projects and to
secure needed funding for basic asset preservation. The City has identified several major priority
areas for which significant capital investments will be needed. The following sections describe these
priority areas at a high level.
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITIES
Planning for the future of Edmonds's public safety facilities is critical to maintaining the high level of
service expected of Edmonds Police Department (EPD). The department has grown significantly and
outgrown the existing facility, in addition there is a need to establish a facility that better serves the
area around HWY 99 and options for that are being explored. This includes neighborhood precinct
projects that will accommodate police staffing growth.
TRANSPORTATION
The City's existing transportation network faces an extensive backlog of major maintenance. Current
funding is insufficient to maintain the City's roads, traffic signals, signs, etc. In addition, the city is in
the process of updating the Transportation Comprehensive Plan. This will provide better CIP needs
for investments in a transit network, bicycle facilities, and pedestrian -oriented infrastructure.
As funding becomes available the city will need to update the ADA transition plan and find funding
sources to make progress on correcting ADA deficiencies. Over the last five years with a
combination of strategies including grant funding and bundling of ADA projects in our pavement
preservation the city has made significant improvement, updating approximately 10% of the
identified deficiencies, however at that rate it will take 50 years to correct all deficiencies.
Packet Pg. 309
6.2.0
PROJECTS
• Highway 99 Corridor: This is the City's largest project — the Highway 99 Corridor — Gateway
project is a multiyear project. Highway 99 is a key regional corridor that extends into Edmonds
from 244th Street SW to 210th Street SW. It is comprised of a 2.25-mile stretch of Highway 99 (a
state highway) and the land area around it. Parts of this corridor are adjacent to the jurisdictions
of Shoreline, Lynnwood, Mountlake Terrace, and Snohomish County. It is also within WSDOT's
limited access at the SR 104 interchange. The City of Edmonds has been working with the
community, business owners, and other stakeholders on planning for the future revitalization of
the Highway 99 Corridor for several years now. Several major projects have been undertaken
toward revitalizing this corridor.
• Pedestrian Safety: The Pedestrian Safety Program is designed to assist City staff in responding to
resident concerns related to improving pedestrian safety at specific locations throughout the
City. The Implementation of a pedestrian safety program allows local pedestrian concerns to be
addressed, with the goal of improving pedestrian safety and increasing the number of
pedestrians using our non -motorized transportation facilities.
• Traffic Calming: The City of Edmonds Traffic Calming Program is designed to assist residents and
City staff in responding to neighborhood traffic issues related to speeding, cut -through traffic,
and safety. Implementation of a traffic calming program allows local traffic concerns to be
addressed consistently, and traffic calming measures to be efficiently developed and put into
operation.
• Pavement Preservation: Our in-house street maintenance and operations crew perform
maintenance for all transportation systems, these include pavement repairs, striping for all
roads, striping on all city crosswalks and maintenance of streetlights and signs. In addition to this
work the city evaluates pavement condition as part of our asset management program to
determine what sections of our pavement require additional pavement preservation treatments,
most will be pavement overlays. This program has been underfunded as the funding sources
(Fuel tax, REET, and GF) are not enough to fund the recommended amount to maintain our road
network in good condition. Investing now will save money later, as regular maintenance extends
the lifetime of pavement. If pavement condition declines too much, the roadways require
rebuilding — which is both costly and disruptive to traffic flow.
UTILITIES
The utilities enterprise funds are used for all utilities projects, both cash and financed projects. In
addition to enterprise funds, the city seeks grants for some utilities projects that have significant
environmental benefits and are competitive on grants. Two examples are the Perrinville Creek and
Edmonds March projects.
• Carbon Recovery Project: The City Wastewater Treatment Plant is nearing the completion of
the Carbon Recovery Project; this project replaces the old incinerator.
Packet Pg. 310
6.2.0
• Nutrient Removal Project: To stop the flow of nitrogen pollution and improve the health of
Puget Sound, the Department of Ecology is requiring wastewater treatment plants to monitor
discharges, optimize operations, and plan for infrastructure investments. Excess nitrogen is
the main pollutant causing low, unhealthy oxygen levels in Puget Sound, and a cascade of
problems for fish and other marine life. The Department of Ecology is in the process of
establishing new nutrient removal standards for all Puget Sound wastewater treatment plans.
To meet the new standards the Edmonds plant will require significant treatment process
modifications, initial studies have been completed and further research is required to select
the right alternative for the plant. the Peugeot sound will have to comply with new nutrient
removal standards, this will require significant investment to meet the new requirements.
• Perrinville Creek restoration: This is a multiyear restoration project necessary to restore the
habitat in the creek and prevent as much as possible the flooding of the neighboring
properties and scouring of the creek bed. The project establishes fish passage structures in
two locations, establishes a new alignment for the creek, and allows full surface flow to the
sound. The project relies on a combination of funding sources including stormwater fund and
grants.
• Reservoir repairs: The city has completed upgrades to two above grade reservoirs. In addition,
a recent inspection and condition assessment resulted in required seismic upgrades to the two
below ground concrete reservoirs. The projects will be designed in 2024 with the goal to
complete construction in 2025-2026.
• Edmonds Marsh: The city is working with the state to potentially purchase the Unocal
property and eventually restore the entire marsh as a true estuary with improved fish habitat
and to mitigate flooding in the surrounding area.
CURRENT PROJECTS
The largest project —the Carbon Recovery project —construct a new system to replace the incinerator
and is nearing completion.
Annual pipe replacement projects for water and sewer systems and annual projects to update or
improve the stormwater system are planned every year to keep up with the need to replace systems
that are past their life expectancy that have records of failure or need additional capacity.
FUNDING
All utility projects are funded by the respective utility's Enterprise fund. The funds are generated
from monies collected from each user of the respective utility. These projects are either cash
financed (e.g., annual replacement/rehab projects) or financed via bonds for larger multi -year capital
projects.
Packet Pg. 311
6.2.0
The 2024-2029 Proposed CIP totals $250 million for six years and includes approximately 60 projects
Approximately $87 million of the six -year total, or 35 %, are utility projects funded by utility rates.
The Edmonds Transportation's CIP totals $152 million (61%) over the six -year period, and Facilities
total is $9.7 Million (4%).
2024-2029 PROPOSED CIP BY DEPARTMENT
Department
2023 Adopted
2024
Proposed
2023-
2027Proposed
CIP
2024-2029
Proposed CIP
Total
Storm Water
$ 3,236,843
$ 3,545,390
$ 23,781,768
$ 25,962,233
Sewer
$ 2,692,439
$ 2,960,498
$ 25,128,359
$ 26,016,498
Water
$ 3,041,128
$ 4,811,000
$ 25,016,658
$ 35,984,000
Utilities Total
$ 8,970,410
$ 11,316,888
$ 73,926,785
$ 87,962,731
Transportation
$ 10,750,891
$ 6,612,273
$165,922,741
$ 152,670,373
Facilities
$ 1,367,539
$ 1,183,845
$ 12,206,046
$ 9,758,635
Total
$ 21,088,8401
$ 19,113,006
$252,055,572
$ 250,391,739
2024-2029 Proposed CIP Total
$9,758,635
, 4%
■ Utilities Total ■Transportation Facilities
2023 & 2024
$12,000
$10,000
t $8,000
H
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
.�c
■ 2023 Adopted ■ 2024 Proposed
Note: 2021 Adopted totals are based on the 2024-2029 Adopted CIP. Not all funds above are appropriated;
see the 2024 Proposed Budget for a list of capital appropriations by department.
10
Packet Pg. 312
6.2.0
As described above, City investments in capital projects are guided by a set of key policies reflecting the
City's values and priorities. These policies shape how the City takes care of buildings and infrastructure,
invests in capital projects in areas that have accepted growth as envisioned in the City's Comprehensive
Plan, preserves the City's buildings, supports sustainable building practices, and ensures that all
members of the community have access to the economic opportunities capital projects create. The
following section details some of these key policies.
CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Comprehensive Plan is a 20-year vision and roadmap for Edmonds's future. The plan guides City
decisions on where to focus development for new jobs and households, how to improve our
transportation system, and where to make capital investments such as utilities, sidewalks, and other
public facilities. The Plan is the framework for most of Edmonds's big -picture decisions on how to
grow. The latest update of the City's Comprehensive Plan was completed in 2020. The City began the
process of updating its Comprehensive Plan in 2023 and the work is scheduled to be complete in
2024.
The current Comprehensive Plan helped inform the development of the 2024-2029 Proposed CIP.
This effort is intended to make sure areas receiving growth have the appropriate physical
infrastructure to accommodate such growth, while balancing the major maintenance of existing
facilities, such as adequate transportation systems, utilities, and other public facilities.
UTILITIES MASTER PLANS
The three utilities have plans to ensure the utility is keeping up with the growth and is being properly
operated to ensure its safety and reliability, the three plans are:
Comprehensive Water System Plan,
Comprehensive Sewer Plan,
Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan
COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
The Comprehensive Transportation Plan was updated in July 2015 and the previous Transportation Plan
was completed in 2009. The plan includes both short-range and long-range strategies that will lead to
the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system that facilitates the safe and
efficient movement of people and goods, while addressing current and future transportation demand as
well as land use. The plan identifies all existing conditions for the various modes of transportation, as
well as proposed safety and mobility improvements. Those projects consist of projected improvements
through 2035 (20-year plan), including roadway (intersection and corridor), transit, and non -motorized
11 Packet Pg. 313
6.2.0
improvements. The document conforms with all requirements for comprehensive planning listed in the
Washington State Growth Management Act Chapter 36.70A.RCW and is consistent with PSRC
Transportation 2040.
FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
The City's utilities have several facility projects in their Capital Improvement Programs to meet
federal and state regulatory requirements. The City of Edmonds must abide by the City's two
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, one for storm water and one for
our publicly owned treatment works (POTW permit) for the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant
(WWTP). The City is required, for example, to invest in the WWTP/storm water system to control and
meet state and federal requirements for city generated flows into receiving bodies of water, including
creeks and Puget Sound. This work is necessary to meet Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
the Department of Ecology (DOE) requirements, regarding sewage releases from the city conveyance
system.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) TRANSITION PLAN
In an effort to make the City of Edmond's public right-of-way facilities accessible to all, the City is in
engaged in developing an American with Disabilities Act (ADA) ADA transition plan for the Public
Right -of -Way. The ADA Transition Plan for the Right -of -Way demonstrates the City of Edmond's
commitment to providing equal access to all its public programs, services, facilities, and activities for
citizens with disabilities. This plan is focused on pedestrian access routes within the right-of-way and
includes sidewalks, curb ramps, street crossings, driveway crossings, rail crossings, hazards, and
pedestrian activated signal systems.
The Plan includes the following:
Program accessibility guidelines, standards, and resources
Physical obstacles that limit the accessibility of facilities to individuals with disabilities
Methods to be used to make the facilities accessible
Prioritization and scheduling process
Estimated budget for barrier removal
Identification of the ADA Coordinator
Public outreach process for plan development
• ADA grievance procedure
12 Packet Pg. 314
6.2.0
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
In 2010, the City adopted its first Climate Action Plan (CAP) to substantially reduce greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions. The City hired local consultants in 2018 to prepare a new GHG inventory and advise
the City on updating its CAP for 2023 and beyond. This updated plan focuses on the most important
steps Edmonds can take to address climate change.
City Council adopted the 2023 Climate Action Plan on March 21st, 2023, via Resolution 1518. The
2023 Plan serves as Edmonds' guide to climate neutrality for municipal and community greenhouse
gas emissions by 2050. This goal aligns with the maximum average global temperature increase of
1.5°C/2.7°F aspired to in the 2016 Paris Climate Accords.
13 Packet Pg. 315
6.2.p
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2024-2029 CAPITAL
FACILITIES PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AS AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL
FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENT OF THE EDMONDS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE
SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
WHEREAS, on September 19, 2023, staff presented the proposed 2024-2029
Capital Facilities Plan & Capital Improvement Program in a joint meeting with the City Council
and Planning Board; and
WHEREAS, on October 10, 2023, a public hearing was held for this item; and
WHEREAS, on October 24, 2023, this item was forwarded to a future City Council
meeting for further discussion; and
WHEREAS, on November 6, 2023, City Council continued discussion and
approved amendments to the proposed 2024-2029 CFP-CIP documents; and
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2023, City Council continued discussion on the
proposed 2024-2029 CFP-CIP documents; and
WHEREAS, the City Council expressly finds that, consistent with RCW
36.70A.130, the adoption of these amendments to the Capital Facilities Plan are the only 2023
amendments to the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan, thereby satisfying the general rule requiring
concurrent review of all amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, NOW THEREFORE
-1-
Packet Pg. 316
6.2.p
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Capital Facilities Plan element of the Edmonds Comprehensive
Plan is hereby amended to incorporate the 2024-2029 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital
Improvement Program to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifi-
cally delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five
(5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
LI-M,
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE NELSON
-2-
Packet Pg. 317
6.2.p
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2023, the City Council of the City of Edmonds,
passed Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2024-
2029 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AS
AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN ELEMENT OF THE EDMONDS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME
EFFECTIVE.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of , 2023.
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
4814-2355-3038,v. I
-3-
Packet Pg. 318
6.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 12/11/2023
Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement Review
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
In September 2023, Council passed Resolution 1529 (attachment 1), tasking the Planning Board to
engage in further review of the draft Comprehensive Plan vision statement. On November 8, 2023
Planning Board suggested minor modifications to the vision statement, which was unanimously support
in their motion to forward the alternative vision statement to Council for consideration by November
30, 2023. On November 21, 2023 this recommendation was presented to Council (minutes attached.)
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council review and approve the Planning Board's recommended revised
community vision statement.
Narrative
Resolution 1529 states:
5. That the Council will approve and make final the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan
Update Vision Statement as soon as possible, but no later than the last Council meeting of
2023, for the purposes of guiding the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update work by the staff,
consultants, and any other parties guiding or leading the update process.
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Resolution 1529
Attachment 2 - Planning Board recommendation to Council
Attachment 3 - October 11, 2023 Planning Board minutes
Attachment 4- November 8, 2023 Planning Board minutes
Pages from 2023-11-21 City Council
Packet Pg. 319
6.3.a
RESOLUTION NO. 1529
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDMONDS, WASHINGTON FOR FINALIZING THE CITY OF
EDMONDS 2024 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VISION
STATEMENT
WHEREAS, a Vision Statement is a legislative policy; and
WHEREAS, the Council is the legislative branch of government with the authority to set policy;
and
WHEREAS, a State requirement does not require a Vision Statement to be part of the
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, much outreach was done to gather inputs on the community vision; and
WHEREAS, data was collected in a fair and representative way during this outreach; and
WHEREAS, the Administration, Council, and public all want to honor the inputs and have a
Vision Statement for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update process that represents those inputs;
and
WHEREAS, the Council is dissatisfied that an ambiguous term in the Vision Statement was not
defined in the initial validation survey issued; and
WHEREAS, the validation survey of the public as to whether the City got the Vision Statement
right generated only 150 responses, and those were evenly split 5 1 % "yes" to 49% "no"; and
WHEREAS, the community provided more validation input in a public hearing on August 2,
2023 and in other input processes since concerning how the vision statement could be edited to
better represent the inputs from the community engagement; and
WHEREAS, the Council wants to make sure the community's true values and vision are guiding
our 2024 Comprehensive Plan process by ensuring the vision statement accurately reflects the
citizen input submitted, and reflects the best iterative process, rather than finalized with first
draft;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. That the vision statement validation inputs (from the August 2, 2023 public hearing and
other) be considered by staff for best representation of the original data collected, and
then the staff s second draft, modified or not from the first, be sent to the Planning Board
and Council as soon as possible, but not later than October 11, 2023.
2. That the word cloud, Edmonds Visioning Survey results, the original draft vision
statement, and the Bloom revision of the draft vision statement will be provided to the
Packet Pg. 320
6.3.a
Planning Board in their board packet, as soon as possible, but not later than October 11,
2023.
3. That the Planning Board will provide feedback and recommendations to the City Council
about which of the versions to adopt ("as is" or with suggested revisions) as soon as
possible, but not later than November 30, 2023.
4. That the revised draft Vision Statement will then come to Council for approval, and
5. That the Council will approve and make final the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan
Update Vision Statement as soon as possible, but no later than the last Council meeting of
2023, for the purposes of guiding the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update work by the staff,
consultants, and any other parties guiding or leading the update process.
RESOLVED this 51h day of September 2023.
CITY OF EDMONDS
Jr
MAYOR, MIKE NELSOI
ATTEST:
C CLERK, C ASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: September 1, 2023
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: September 5, 2023
RESOLUTION NO. 1529
Packet Pg. 321
6.3.b
►OFPLME
To: Edmonds City Council
From: Judi Gladstone, Planning Board Chair
Date: November 16, 2023
City staff developed a vision statement for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) Update
after conducting a community engagement process. In September 2023, Council passed
Resolution 1529, tasking the Planning Board to review the draft Comp Plan vision statement and
provide a recommendation to Council by November 30, 2023, which could include
recommending the statement as -is or a revised statement.
Discussion by the Planning Board at the October 11 meeting resulted in a subcommittee being
created to bring a recommendation for a revised vision statement to consider by the November
8 meeting. The goal was to honor the community input while making it more of a vision
statement rather than a values statement.
The subcommittee offered a statement that aligned with what a vision statement is: forward -
thinking, aspirational, concise, and clearly communicated to create a picture of what we want
the city to be. The proposed revisions still use the most common words from the community
input, although in a slightly different structure that better aligns with what a vision statement is
intended to do.
The subcommittee offered the following for Planning Board discussion:
"Edmonds is a welcoming city that has a small town feel offering outstanding
quality of life for all with vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe streets,
parks, and a thriving arts scene shaped in a way to promote healthy lifestyles,
climate resiliency, and the natural beauty of our community."
Board members discussed the public comment received and input from the student
representative. That discussion considered two concepts. The first concept discussed was "small
town feel." While those are words that emerged from the community input, Planning Board
members agreed that they could be misconstrued. For that reason, Planning Board members
thought it best not to include them. The second concept discussed was the importance of
"access to" the natural beauty of our community. That concept seemed important to be clear
what it was that the community was seeking, so the Planning Board members agreed to include
this in the vision statement. The discussion resulted in the unanimous recommendation to the
Council to approve the following vision statement for the 2024 Comp Plan Update:
"Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all with
vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe streets, parks, and a thriving arts scene
shaped in a way to promote healthy lifestyles, climate resiliency, and access to
the natural beauty of our community."
Packet Pg. 322
6.3.c
the Council President, and they got off to a bumpy start. They just had their first meeting two weeks ago. They
anticipate keeping the advisory group going until final decisions are made on the property. Vice Chair Tragus-
Campbell suggested adding a section to the agenda for an advisory board report out.
Board Member Maxwell said it is somewhat important to acknowledge that the success of the Civic Park
indicates that they have some talent at creating public spaces which matters. Based on other public spaces in the
City, it is very promising that it would work out well. Board Member Martini concurred and added that the
accessibility for the new Civic Park is amazing.
B. Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement Review
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell said the City Council requested that the Planning Board review the original vision
statement and associated word cloud and make a recommendation to the Council by November 30. Director
McLaughlin provided some background on the Comprehensive Plan branding process and the six -week targeted
public outreach process. Throughout the process, 8500 comments were received and categorized. From this, a
draft vision statement was created along with a graphic illustration of the process. The statement was put through
a multilingual review process to make sure that words weren't misinterpreted or not understood by different
languages.
Draft community vision statement:
Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all. We value environmental
stewardship, vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe and healthy streets, and a thriving arts scene. We
are engaged residents who take pride in shaping our resilient future.
A survey was put in the city newsletter to see if they generally got the statement right. 51 % of those who
responded were supportive of the statement. 49% were not. Director McLaughlin reviewed how each of the
phrases correspond to the most commonly used words. She explained that Council had specific concerns about
the phrase "healthy streets". While "healthy" was not a word that was necessarily represented, staff thought it
did represent the other words used such as walkability, green, biking, pedestrian, kids, etc. She summarized the
Council resolution as previously discussed by Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell with the request that Planning Board
provide feedback and recommendations to the City Council about which of the versions to adopt ("as is" or
with suggested revisions) as soon as possible. Director McLaughlin stated she is confident in their process and
believes that the draft community vision statement is representative of the comments. She thinks if they have to
revisit the statement for an extended period of time, they risk delaying the plan itself. She pointed out that the
State does not require a vision statement to be part of the comprehensive plan for the Growth Management Act.
It was something staff wanted to use to energize people around in high level conversation. They did that and
were able to categorize key themes to be used moving forward. If the Board wishes to advance another version,
staff recommend striking the word "healthy" and just keeping it to "safe streets".
Discussion:
Board Member Mitchell pointed out that the Council wouldn't have drafted the resolution if they were happy
with it. He assumed they wanted the Board to revise it. Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell concurred. Board Member
Mitchell said he didn't like how the resolution was drafted in the first place, pinning the original draft vision
statement to the Bloom version. A more appropriate resolution would have been to send it to a steering
committee of some kind to evaluate the data, come up with two versions, and bring those two versions to the
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 6 of 8
Packet Pg. 323
6.3.c
Planning Board. It seems like a step was missed in the process engagement by just picking Ms. Bloom's version.
He suggested making the revisions to the original statement rather than just sending one or the other back.
Board Member Maxwell thought that Director McLaughlin's approach was reasonable rather than jumping to
rewriting the vision statement.
Vice Chair Tragus Campbell asked the Board if they wanted to tackle any sort of revision or if they support
going with the staff recommendation of just moving forward.
Chair Gladstone recalled they had discussed the vision statement earlier in the year and that there was a general
feeling that it wasn't really a vision statement; instead, it was more of a statement of values. She thought that
the phrases in the vision statement were fair representations of the comments they received. In her mind, it
would be improved by voicing it as a vision statement and not a value statement, but she didn't know if this was
what Council had in mind. She thinks to go without a value statement is going to plague the process of the
comprehensive plan with various residents. She recommended spending time on this at a different meeting to
try to coalesce around a vision statement that contains most of the concepts here.
Board Member Golembiewski said she thinks this vision statement is very close to acceptable. She thinks it
accurately reflects the comments received. She thinks it could be as simple as, "Edmonds strives to be a
welcoming city ..." She agrees that the word "healthy" associated with streets is a little weird although she
understands the thought process behind it. Health is something they value as far as being an active, healthy
community that takes pride in outdoor spaces and walkability and things like that.
Board Member Kuehn agreed with Chair Gladstone that this seems more like a statement of values rather than
a vision statement. He also agreed that it was very close and could use some tweaking to voice it as a vision
statement. He would like to tweak it at a future meeting and send a recommendation to Council.
Board Member Martini expressed concern about kicking this down the road. She recommended establishing a
timeframe in which to finish this.
Student Representative Distelhorst said she was surprised they were still talking about the vision statement. She
doesn't understand why this has taken so long.
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell recommended forming another subcommittee. Director McLaughlin commented
that staff would want to be part of that to make sure that all those statements are taken into account. The
translation issue is also very important. They do not have any consultant funding at all for this right now.
Board Member Kuehn thought that if they just tweak some of the wording to make it a vision statement, but
don't change the message, it could be good enough. It wouldn't need to be anything that changes from the word
cloud. Director McLaughlin explained it was intended to be written in the present tense as if you were already
in the future.
Board Member Golembiewski asked if they could just call it a value statement since a vision statement isn't a
required element of the comprehensive plan. Board Member Kuehn said he recommended that months ago.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 7 of 8
Packet Pg. 324
6.3.c
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MARTINI TO DECLARE THIS TO BE A VALUE
STATEMENT INSTEAD OF A VISION STATEMENT AND THAT THE PLANNING BOARD
CONSTRUCT MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO IT AT THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
MOTION MADE BY CHAIR GLADSTONE, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER KUEHN, THAT
THEY WORK WITH STAFF TO TWEAK THIS AND COME BACK TO THE PLANNING BOARD
NO LATER THAN TWO MEETINGS FROM NOW. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
There will be a tree code update at the next meeting. There will also be a discussion or recommendation on the
Critical Aquifer Recharge Zone and a comprehensive plan discussion. Highway 99 community renewal
program update is being removed from the 25th. If there are any comments regarding the Parks, Recreation &
Human Services Department - 2023 Q3 Accomplishments, they should be sent to Director Feser.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Chair Gladstone said it was nice to see Director McLaughlin at the meeting. She thanked Ms. Powers for filling
in for Mike Clugston.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Vice Chair Tragus-Campbell thanked everyone for their participation.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 9:17 p.m.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
October 11, 2023 Page 8 of 8
Packet Pg. 325
6.3.d
• Prior to the 2017 up zone, the Census Tract 509 was already designated as an area with a moderate risk
of displacement. It is a historically disadvantaged community which has gotten worse in terms of what
people are making versus what it costs to live there. The bubbles overlying the transit places to up zone
are the exact same locations that would trigger the other part of that House Bill around anti -displacement
strategies. How are the anti -displacement strategies for that community going to be developed. Director
McLaughlin replied this is something that is high on their radar but it is too early to be able to answer
it.
The group recessed for five minutes from 8:53 to 8:57 p.m. while the Economic Development Commission
members left the meeting.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement Review
Director McLaughlin thanked the subcommittee for taking a look at this. She commented that they honored the
commonly used words while modifying it modestly so it is still consistent with community feedback. She spoke
to the importance of acknowledging Student Representative Distelhort's concerns. Chair Gladstone explained
that unfortunately Student Rep. Distelhorst was not able to participate in the discussion. In order to do this in a
timely fashion they had to do it via email. She presented a draft to the group which attempts to convert this from
a part vision/part value statement to a vision statement. She thinks that a vision statement is important for the
Comprehensive Plan because the community is expecting it and because it sets the stage for policy to come. A
vision statement should be forward thinking and aspirational. She reviewed the process taken to convert the
statement to a vision statement encompassing the responses from the engagement survey. She invited discussion
regarding Student Representative Distelhort's concerns about "small town feel" conjuring up something of the
past and not of the future. Chair Gladstone explained that "small town feel" was included because it had 211
hits in the community responses. There was also a comment from Ron Eber mentioning access to natural beauty,
and not just the fact that it exists.
Board Member Maxwell said he thought he understood what people meant by "small town feel" but Student
Representative Distelhorst's comment made it clear that there are other interpretations. She is concerned that a
small town could become synonymous with suburban. To him it is related to grid streets, easy walkability, and
short buildings not more than three stories tall.
Board Member Golembiewski agreed but noted that it is hyper -focused on the bowl. Using it to describe
Edmonds as a whole, and so early in the vision statement, re-emphasizes that the bowl is where they are focusing
their priorities. She thought it would be inaccurate to list "small town" in the vision statement for Edmonds as
a whole.
Chair Gladstone said she felt comfortable having it in there because it relates to the walkability, the
interconnectedness, and the shorter buildings. She lives near Highway 99 and isn't sure that having 75-foot
buildings everywhere is what they want to aim for either. She was fine with striking it but noted that if they tried
to put something else in there, they would be moving away from reflecting some of the language in the
responses.
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
November 8, 2023 Page 5 of 7
Packet Pg. 326
6.3.d
Board Member Kuehn expressed appreciation for Board Member Distelhorst's comments. He noted that "small
town feel" was something that was continuously brought up in the responses. He thinks this is more a character
of the city itself and a lot of the neighborhoods or communities. A lot of areas within the city have characteristics
of their own that have that kind of feel. Also, a lot of people are drawn to Edmonds because of that small town
feel within it. He doesn't want to get away from that characteristic because it is one of the things they
consistently heard from the respondents.
Board Member Mitchell commented that from an urban planning perspective, they could still plan from that
term. It could mean things like smaller streets, larger public realms, etc. You can still have a small town feel in
a densified area.
Director McLaughlin commented that the phrase might be challenging for non-English speakers. She also
thought that the fact that people need to explain what they mean by it also raises some concerns.
Board Member Nutsch commented that what it seemed like they were trying to get at is that Edmonds is a place
you want to live and where you want to be, not just where you have your address.
Chair Gladstone asked if there was any other word they would want to include if they drop that phrase. There
was agreement to strike the phrase, "that has a small town feel".
Chair Gladstone asked for feedback about the suggestion to include "access to" the natural beauty of the
community. There was general agreement to include this.
She read the revised proposed vision statement as follows:
Edmonds is a welcoming city offering outstanding quality of life for all with vibrant and diverse
neighborhoods, safe streets, parks, and a thriving art scene, shaped in a way to promote healthy
lifestyles, climate resiliency, and access to the natural beauty of our community.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MITCHELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
MAXWELL, TO RECOMMEND THE ALTERNATIVE VISION STATEMENT AS READ TO THE
CITY COUNCIL. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
• November 29 meeting - Private property tree code recommendations from the work group, CARA
public hearing, and introduction of detached ADUs.
• The December 5 City Council meeting report will be pushed out to January because of the City Council
schedule.
• December 13 meeting — Detached Accessory Dwelling Units.
• Some adjustments will need to be made to the extended agenda for everything beyond November 29.
• Chair Gladstone requested more specificity as they move forward on which elements of the Comp Plan
will be addressed and when they will be addressed. Director McLaughlin agreed.
• Commissioner Maxwell asked about the process of making land use changes that are reflected in the
Comprehensive Plan. Director Mclaughlin explained that the Comprehensive Plan is first adopted and
that leads code development. Subsequent to adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, staff will work to
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
November 8, 2023 Page 6 of 7
Packet Pg. 327
6.3.e
Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott read a resolution of the Edmonds City Council thanking Councilmember Dave
Teitzel for his service on the city council.
Councilmember Teitzel thanked council for the nice words, commenting it is amazing how fast the last year
and three months have gone by, but a lot had been accomplished. He was appointed to briefly occupy the
late-Councilmember Kristiana Johnson's seat. She set very high standards on council and was very
collaborative, even tempered, data driven and nonpartisan, great standards for all councilmembers to keep
in mind while serving on council. He was sure Chris Eck would do a great job. It has been great, rewarding
and a privilege to work with the citizens and an honor to work with the City's professional, talented staff
who do great things for the City. He also thanked his fellow councilmembers, commenting it had been very
rewarding to work with them although they agreed and disagree at times. There is a talent and skill to
disagreeing in an agreeable way and he hoped the council would continue in that regard.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM OLSON MOVE SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER NAND,
THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE THE RESOLUTION THANKING COUNCILMEMBER
TEITZEL FOR HIS SERVICE ON CITY COUNCIL.
Council President Pro Tem Olson expressed her gratitude to Councilmember Teitzel and to Kathy Teitzel
who saw very little of Dave as he literally squeezed four years of work into a spectacular year of service to
the City of Edmonds. It was a gift to her that he put in his name in the hat and was appointed by council.
The vacancy left by Councilmember Kristiana Johnson's death left voids of process, parliamentary
knowledge, and friendship. While she was irreplaceable, Councilmember Teitzel leapt in on day one,
proceeded as the experienced councilmember he was, and contributed immensely to council's success
during the time he served. He is an amazing colleague and an amazing Edmonds councilmember.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
2. THANK YOU FROM CHASE LAKE ELEMENTARY
Councilmember Paine read a thank you from the students of Chase Lake Elementary School and referenced
the compassion award the council received for providing the needed funds to support the student 0
intervention coordinator position in their school; ARPA funds allocated for those positions helped over
1000 students in Edmonds. Chase Lake Elementary has a set of beliefs that guide their school culture: take t�
care of yourself, take care of others and take care of this place. The council received the compassion N
certificates because they have those beliefs in common with the student body. r
3. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VISION
STATEMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott advised the council was not taking action tonight. The intent is to hear the planning
board's recommendation, continue to gather community input, and take action at a subsequent council
meeting.
Planning & Development Susan McLaughlin explained the planning & development department worked
collaboratively with the community during summer 2022 to develop a draft community vision statement
meant to guide the work of the comprehensive plan. Via resolution 1529, the council asked for the vision
statement to be returned to the planning board for their consideration. Based on discussion at the planning
board on October 11, 2023, a slightly modified version of the vision statement was proposed, discussed and
recommended to the city council. She read the revised vision statement: "Edmonds is a welcoming city
offering outstanding quality of life for all with vibrant and diverse neighborhoods, safe streets, parks, and
a thriving arts scene shaped in a way to promote healthy lifestyles, climate resiliency, and access to the
natural beauty of our community." Staff supported the modifications as they reflected on the commonly
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 21, 2023
Page 4
Packet Pg. 328
used words for each of the phrases in the vision statement and determined it was consistent with the 8500
comments received.
Councilmember Nand asked Ms. McLaughlin to speak to the phrase "small town feel," on which council
has received a significant volume of comments. As a person of color, she understood some people felt this
statement was exclusionary, however, when a councilmember in another city disparagingly referred to
Edmonds as quaint and small town, she laughed and said that was what people like about Edmonds. She
recognized in terms of density, housing justice, history of redlining and racial segregation, this is a very
fraught topic. On the surface a small town feel is not a controversial term. She asked staff to speak on that
and why the planning board felt that could be misconstrued and should be removed.
Ms. McLaughlin answered there is a lot of subjective to interpretation; the planning board student rep
strongly objected to small town feel as she did not feel it represented the youth or a 20-year vision of
Edmonds. The student rep put her objections in writing which Ms. McLaughlin offered to share with
council. Upon receipt of that youth perspective, it was discussed at the planning board and some members
agreed and some disagreed, but ultimately the board felt because of that reaction and perhaps the
subjectivity and interpretation of that phrase, if it needed further definition or explanation, maybe it was
not the best phrase for universal understanding. She recalled the vision statement went through a pretty
robust interpretation process to ensure it was understood in a variety of languages with easy to understand
phrases that wouldn't be misconstrued. Small town feel was not used initially and would need to go through
that process to understand if it was understandable in multiple languages.
Councilmember Buckshnis spoke in favor of restoring the small town feel language. In reading the source =
data, there were a lot of comments about small town feel. She found it interesting that one youth's comments s
were used to represent all youth in Edmonds. Another approach would have been to ask the youthCL
commission and she offered to ask them at Wednesday's meeting. She found it unfortunate that the vision
E
statement was changed based on one person's comments when the council's suggestion to include gem of
0
the Puget Sound was rejected. She did not view the proposed statement as a vision statement. In her opinion,
small town feel should be restored to the vision statement as one student does not represent all youth in the
City. Ms. McLaughlin said the role of the planning board's student rep is to represent the youth perspective
c
for the planning board in their discussions which is what she did.
v
Council President Pro Tem Olson said some people may think small town feel is colloquial, small and
r
undeveloped. She said Washington DC has a small town feel although it is definitely an urban environment.
`"
r
It has a small town vibe, people know each other and there is a welcoming feeling so small town feel
r
portrayed something very different to her. She referred to a comment by Planning Board Member Nutsch
c
that it seemed like what they were trying to get at is that Edmonds is a place you want to live and where
N
you want to be, not just where you have your address. She said that was an expression of what small town
c
feel meant to her.
w
Council President Pro Tem Olson recalled one of the original vision statements referenced engaged
residents. Ms. McLaughlin said it was in the original vision statement. Council President Pro Tem Olson
missed that phrase in the version that the planning board recommended because that is an identifier that
separates Edmonds from others in the current day as well as into the future. That is one of the City's best
traits and something she wanted to build on and expand.
Councilmember Teitzel expressed support for including small town feel in the vision statement. A vision
statement is aspirational in nature so small town feel is where the City is now and where residents want to
go. He doubted anyone on the dais aspired to be Bellevue, Seattle or Ballard; they aspire to be Edmonds
which has small town charm, not only downtown but Firdale Village, Perrinville, Westgate, Five Corners,
the International District, the Hospital District, etc., each of which has its own small town charm. He
reiterated that phrase should be included because that is what residents aspire to be.
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 21, 2023
Page 5
Packet Pg. 329
6.3.e
Councilmember Nand liked Councilmember Teitzel's use of the phrase small town charm because
Edmonds is famous for its charm. That is what people talk about, a quality that is not necessarily linked to
density or size because Edmonds is one of densest, largest cities in Snohomish County. Given consideration
of the 8500 comments, the discussion between the subcommittee and the planning board and their
recommendation, she did not necessarily want there to be more process and preferred to finalize the vision
statement and proceed. She recalled a lot of people liked the phrase gem of Puget Sound and Council
President Pro Tern Olson wanted to have engaged citizens included and she would like to have the word
charm included because she thinks of Edmonds as a charming place. In considering the allocation of staff
resources and volunteer time, it would behoove the council to adopt some version of the vision statement
tonight. Although she would like to add small town charm to the vision statement, she did not want it to be
a point of contention that takes more time.
Councilmember Chen commented small town charm is what everybody loves and wishes the City would
continue to be, but the reality is there are different parts of Edmonds with different demographics and that
feel different. Highway 99 is very dense and the crime rate is higher than other parts of the City. If the
council wants to be all inclusive, they needed to face reality.
Councilmember Paine appreciated the efforts of staff, the planning board and the community to get this
right. The vision statement is a profound statement for the next 20 years. She agreed with Councilmember
Chen that there are differences in the City. The proposed vision statement is 95% accurate and further
wordsmithing will gain very little. She will be curious to hear what the youth commission says and looked
forward to the vision statement coming back to council for action.
Councilmember Chen commented the council has spent so much time on the vision statement, something
that is not required. He suggested tabling it because it was too controversial.
Councilmember Buckshnis supported Councilmember Chen's suggestion to table, noting branding and the
vision statement are not required. If the correct language cannot be found, perhaps it should be left out.
M
0
Councilmember Nand disagreed with tabling the vision statement because she wanted to respect the work
v
of the planning department, volunteers, and citizen activists. The reason this discussion has become so
fraught and absorbed a lot of time and attention and has been more controversy than anyone anticipated is
v
r
because it is of high value to the community. The vision statement won't be branded on city hall, it will be
r
included in the comprehensive plan. The community felt this was an opportunity to announce a common
r
identity for Edmonds and the council needs to respect that.
Council President Pro Tern Olson commented the resolution was written to be passed by the end of the
year. She did not anticipating having any difficulty doing that so there was no reason to table.
Councilmembers can listen to each other, digest what was said tonight, and finish it in early December.
4. REPLENISHMENT REPORT
Administrative Services Director Dave Turley presented a Replenishment Report in accordance with the
Fund Balance the Fund Balance Reserve Policy adopted in July 2019. He reviewed:
• Introduction
o What is this report tonight?
■ Fund Balance Reserve Policy Article III — If any use of the General Fund Operating
Reserve has occurred, the Finance Director must present to Mayor and City Council an
annual Replenishment Report during the month of November. The Replenishment Report
must be presented each year, until the reserves are fully replenished. The Replenishment
Report must include the following information:
Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes
November 21, 2023
Page 6
Packet Pg. 330