Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
APPROVED PLN Hazard Tree Removal PLN2023-0077
CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION '17C. 18y\3 December 12, 2023 Gregory Mashburn 19918 Maplewood Drive Edmonds, WA 98026 Subject: Hazard Tree Removal (PLN2023-0077) Dear Mr. Mashburn, The removal of 2 hazard trees has been approved per ECDC 23.10.040(F)(2) and as recommended by your arborist. The trees meet hazard criteria per the submitted TRAQ forms. The hazard trees are not within a mapped Critical Area and therefore do not require replacements. If you have any questions, please let me know at either rose.haas@edmondswa.gov or 425- 771-0220. Thank you, Rose Haas, Planner CITY OF EDMONDS MyBuildingPermit.com Clearing and Grading Application #1401136 - Hazardous Tree Removal - 19918 Applicant First Name Last Name Company Name Gregory Mashburn Number Street Apartment or Suite Number E-mail Address 10016 Edmonds Way #C318 greg@gregmashburn.com City State Zip Phone Number Extension Edmonds WA 98020 (206) 963-0561 Contractor Company Name GENTLE BEN'S TREE SERVICE INC Number Street Apartment or Suite Number 16627 NE 48th Court City State Zip Phone Number Extension Redmond WA 98052 (425) 881-3398 State License Number License Expiration Date UBI # E-mail Address GENTLBT110JD 2/27/2025 FD1 D4577D greg@gregmashburn.com Project Location Number Street Floor Number Suite or Room Number 19918 MAPLEWOOD DR City Zip Code County Parcel Number EDMONDS 98026 00548900002804 Associated Building Permit Number Tenant Name Additional Information (i.e. equipment location or special instructions)_ Work Location Property Owner First Name Last Name or Company Name Gregory Dee & Donna Marie Mashburn Number Street Apartment or Suite Number 10016 EDMONDS WAY C 318 City State Zip EDMONDS WA 98020 Certification Statement - The applicant states: I certify that I am the owner of this property or the owner's authorized agent. If acting as an authorized agent, I further certify that I have full power and authority to file this application and to perform, on behalf of the owner, all acts required to enable the jurisdiction to process and review such application. I have furnished true and correct information. I will comply with all provisions of law and ordinance governing this type of application. If the scope of work requires a licensed contractor to perform the work, the information will be provided prior to permit issuance. Date Submitted: 11/7/2023 Submitted By: Gregory Mashburn Page 1 of 2 i CITY OF EDMONDS MyBuildingPermit.com Clearing and Grading Application #1401136 - Hazardous Tree Removal - 19918 Project Contact Company Name: Name: Gregory Mashburn Email: greg@gregmashburn.com Address: 10016 Edmonds Way #C318 Phone #: (206) 963-0561 Edmonds WA 98020 Project Type Activity Type Scope of Work Single Family Residential Hazard Tree Removal Tree Removal Project Name: Hazardous Tree Removal - 19918 Removal of 2 Hazardous Trees from 19918 Maplewood Drive, Edmonds, WA 98026. Tree #1 Description of Scots Pine, 16 dbh, Height 49 feet, Crown Spread 32 feet Location: Front Yard - Driveway Work: Area & Kids Play (See Map Area #1) Tree #2 - Douglas Fir, 31 dbh, Height 61 feet, Crown Spread 42 feet. Location: Front Yard - 2 Driveways and & Neighbors House (See Map Area #2) Project Details Tree Information Total number of trees to be removed Description (species, diameter) Location (front yard, back yard, etc.) 2 Tree #1 - Scots Pine, 16 inches Tree #2 - Douglas Fir, 31 Inches Tree #1 Front Yard - Driveway Area & Kids Play Area Tree #2 Front Yard - 2 Driveways and & Neighbors House Page 2 of 2 Cover Letter Tree Removal 19918 Maplewood Drive, Edmonds, WA 98026 Plan: Removal of 2 Hazardous Trees from 19918 Maplewood Drive, Edmonds, WA 98026. Tree #1 Scots Pine, 16 dbh, Height 49 feet, Crown Spread 32 feet Location: Front Yard - Driveway Area & Kids Play (See Map Area #1) Tree #2 - Douglas Fir, 31 dbh, Height 61 feet, Crown Spread 42 feet. Location: Front Yard - 2 Driveways and & Neighbors House (See Map Area #2) City of Edmonds HAZARD TREE 0 63.15 126.3 Feet 94.0 This ma is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for 1,128 P B P PP 6 reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere current, or otherwise reliable. © City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION Legend Contour Lines to -- so- too ArcSDE.GIS.STREET CENTERLINE: <all other values, 1 2 5; 4 9;71;7;8 Sections Boundary Sections Edmonds Boundary ArcSDE.GIS.PROPERTY_BUILDIN( ArcSDE.GIS.STREET CENTERLINE: <all other values> Interstate Principal Arterial Minor Arterial; Collector Local Street State Highways <all other values> _ 0 1 2 County Boundary Notes 19918 MAPLEWOOD DR ConsultingArborist USA.cont Bence MacC®y (M.S. Forestry) 1100 Bellevue Way NE, 0273 Bellevue, Washington 98004 My Desk Phone: 425-450-1584 ® My Cell Phone: 425-246-5778 PN-0159A 10828 Email: ConsultingAd)orist.USA®gmail.com A /� ISA Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client CTAf O 44-fUfQ1%A# . ChAMMOS Date oer 20&3 Time Ooti Address/Tree location -1911 • AUftegagaa lD/t;VO, ABOZ L Tree no. Sheet 1 of 2 Tree species Sew r. a #'0***VrL dbh it iK Height 49 Am Crown spread dia. 31 Assessor(s) Bruce MacCoy, , M : 425.246,5778 Time frame 6 months Tools used VTA , D tape, Mallett Target Assessment Targetzone �o Occupancy rate n ;, e a s ~ Target description g p .'c+ ' a X i-rare 2—occaslonel f 6 cz e 3—frequent -10 t= v 4—constant Ecc 12 n. 1 tt•vswa� :a f�.� �tw. 2 3 4 atte ractors History of failures '0 A/ 44- thEr R44-DA4GrA/-3Ue Topography Flatl�e❑ �l Y. Aspect /V4 SitechangesNone Qo6adechange ❑Slteclearing❑ Changed soil hydrology ❑ Rootcuts❑ Descri a ooOV4 Soil conditions Limited volume WASi:urated ❑ ShallowllCompacted ❑ Pavement over roots % Describe D A V6 w aV Prevailing winddlrectionIfLA Common weather Strong winds Er50 Snow GWeavyrain l3P-6escribe "tQ.V' rt.t 'T'eA'_.,t,(.r Tree Health and Species Pro le Vigor Low ❑ Normal Q/F(i'gh ❑ Foliage None (seasonal gP None (cleadWONormal 47 F % Chlorotic % Necrotic % Pests ao Abiotic ,• Species failure profile Branches n ❑ Roots❑ Describe KC.i Ohre Tit asr:-- Load Factors Wind exposure Protected❑ Partial la M0 Wind funneling � 1✓6t;W6Relativecrown size Small Medium arge❑ Crown density Sparse EJ NTrmal13-ftnse Interior branches FewWwRMmal❑ Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss �D V. ti+EX Recent or planned change in load factors,Qdeoji!- TWW-a- X b A0 jP d - .Or-, Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure Crown and Branches — ,./� Unbalanced crown G1/ LCR '�&_% Cracks W V421" ite,*V. Lightning damage.ty�. Dead twigs/branches ✓ % overall Max. dia. 2 It" Codominant ❑ /(iO Included bar e Broken/Hangers Number-.&j Max. dia. VA - Over -extended branches�'p Weak attachments ❑ Nv Cavity/Nest hole%circ. Pruning history Previous branch failures wf ` Similar branches presenoW Crown cleaned Thinned Raised /� Dead/Mis�in�g bar* Cankers/Galls/Bur Sapwood damage/decay 0� Reduced Topped D9 Lion -tailed t, Conl<i cP•r!' v Heartwood decay I�/QMisi /.f 4e. Flush cuts 0 Other IVA Response growth `A T b PO.6AIL , Main concern(s) --4qdP M A- zVr'Aoj9o4L / a. NT"49AIwiiV _ i 1a u Ag* Ad e. gep V � q„ Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate gnificant ❑ Likelihood of failure improbable ❑ Possible ❑ Probable 1 j/lmminent ❑ u -Trunlc ® ® Roots and Root Collar CDead/Missing bark G ' Abnormal bark texture/color _ / Collar burie /Not visible �epth -*A*, Stem girdling& odominantstems W� I�ded barlyl✓ Cracks D� Dead o Decay G� Conks/Mushroomapwood dama*aayI�Cankers/Galls/Burl�6p ooze p�� Ooze per' Cavity ❑ �/b% circ. Lightningdarrtwooddecayl�fonks/Mushroom Cracks ut/Damaged rootsQ4 ss1-nceffrom/trunk 481ti Cavity/Nest holcirc. Depth ,�iA Poor taper l� Root plate liftinwe Soil weakness a❑, Lean..ir.Q.° Corrected7_ D �— Response growth F .*. z Tb mr D/t • Response growth 7-0r"�a' R n DO /L Main concern(s) C 1126, 4404f t� OiVTO Main concerns) -TO tt".ba UP%ZOD a^. Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate 01 -Vgnificant ❑ Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant o/ Likelihoodoftallure - / Likelihood offailure -- Improbable❑ Possible ❑ Probable &- Imminent ❑ Improbable❑ Possible ❑ Probable Imminent E3j Consulting Arborist 0 t T 0 01 4 A Bruce MaXoy, 1100 Bellevue. WaT , NE #273 � 0 Bellevue, Washing -ton, 98004 Risk Categorization Conditions of concern Target 1=0�- Risk rating of part (from i0101.1111 loll Bill C:01:01W C 0 C C C C A Eel C A C 0 ����C� ��CCCCC��C70C�CrC� ACOC CI:RC» WARN W MM CIRRI CNAO C`WWW WARN M M M C0 CWr A C A1*1 Nj N Ci:C9, 70A A A WAW� N 9 XEel 9 C 9 X C C DE 1011*190� c [01 o 101ccc X roll W 101 W 101 W A • C O C Eel CC C C C A Co7 © CC A C � M M M C A A A C CC C PSIA,A 7 CC C A � 1 ACC NO Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood of Failure Likelihood of Impacting Target Very low Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable I Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikel MatrI Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Failure & Impact Consequences of Failure Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Low Low Notes, explanations, descriptions ConsultingArbodst.USA@gmall.com Ex tt e s s 0 iv 1 I-C-I '=it..! wo'sIS Le, ; -rua rtu.&Ok 0 e xe o s tv. ✓e, czIor. N �% O t North J • v seCUR %rw �1/ita GAT -a Mitigation options T1 C. CplaA er-r 'ill CO t W : C.t de Also Residual risk �t4o�l Apt sid/�G,r� D/ar'y�aw A - t: D V+c. /9. Sw A2:e-* . Residual risk S A4 At 14• c.. et'a Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low Moderate 0 High xtreme C3 Work priority 1 ■ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ Overall residual risk Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High ❑ Extreme I] Recommended inspection interval 6 Months. Data ■ Final ❑ Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ■No DYes-Type/Reason N / A Inspection limitations NNone []Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe N / A This detasheet was produced by the hrternational Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists — 2013 Page 2 of 2 ConsultingArborlst USA.com Bruce MacCoy (M.S. Forestry) 1100 Bellevue Way NE, #273 Bellevue, Washington 98004 My Desk Phone: 425-450-1584 ® My Cell Phone: 425-246-5778 PN-0159A 10828 Email: Consul►ingArborist.USA@gmail.com I Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client Ao AFbA40Date L7 r., 20" Time Address/Tree location r t ISOXG Tree no. Z Sheet t of 2 Tree species d b h '3 iN. Height Crown spread dla. W2 Assessor(s) Bruce MacCoy , M : 425.246.5778 Time frame 6 months Tools used VTA , D tape, Mellott Threat AcsPccmP_nt Target zone occupancy rate n. $ e e e e description ,cyrr1-rarieoTarget X2-occa nal 3-frequent @ ii i Bo 8 4-constant i E a 2 3 4 aae rdUors History of failures oc"JedobAMIL wr RX aa o? er4 es Ze TopographyFlatU-S!6pe❑Aspect Site changes None rade change❑ Site clearing Changed soil hydrology [3 Root cuts❑ Describe Soil conditions Limited volume ( rated ❑ Shallow®'CDmpacted l*avement over roots I1117:2Y0% Describe i t ✓.E 4J,4 Y Prevailing wind direction .5*k) Common weather Strong winds GNLe-❑ SnowO-HMUv rain OF -Describe Ss.as�C7 VIA.'e.��, Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low ❑ Normal Igh ❑ foliage None (seasonal) O None (dea Normal % Chiorotic •% Necroticd&% Pests-ekaeyc A AA4 R t .v7-' Abiotic Gelole.st.`.t��s-.ter- L e.�,�Ie.Qs. Species failure profile Branches❑ TrunkMRMs❑ Describe ?rw v A.*-ora to•!c Load Factors Wind exposure Protected ❑ Partial ull ❑ Wind funneling Relative crown size Small edlum["rge❑ Crowndensity Sparse❑ Normal�nse❑ Interior branches Few❑ NormalO.B¢rtse❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑,� a` 4r Recent or planned change In load factors .4Z L 7-i4 .s. r _ Kiy Ow O F - Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure Crown and Branches — TDe'd crown ail/ LCR 6 % Cracks 0/ 4�GS Lightning damage ranches fY %overall Max. dia.'Z:.✓ Codominant B� [ G ,r Included bark Gl�ers Number A,�A Max. dia. Over -extended branche�p Weak attachments [ilY Cavity/Nest hole o circ. Pruning history Previous branch failures all - Pruning S(milar branches present ®� d �9 P. Dead/Miss nn bark Mk�ankers/Galls/Bur oSapwood damage/decay G� Crown cleaned �9 Thinned�D Raise Reduced A Topped 61 Lion -tailed Con ks.Cli' O M r Heartwood decay -/r_%"L A W Flush cuts A791 Other ' Response growth 7'D Ay a e ? . Main concern(s) SAL a. a: G TA A t t 6 A V C sl Sif s j> Load on defect N/A [3 Minor ❑ Moderate ❑�, �Significant Yet S Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ ❑ W Possible Probable ,-' mminent ❑ � —Trunk — — Roots nd Root Collar — 7Dead/Missinig bark AID Abnormal bark texture/color m� Collar buried/Not visiblg� epth�i� Stem girdlin stems W" Included bark 4� Cracks m/ Dead ,P�%P Decay,PJs' O Conks/Mushroo mage/ ay m<a__nkers/Galls/Bur Aap ooze M Ooze �,Ielf' O Cavity❑�%06circ. ma artwood decaym� nks/Mushroom Cracks tut/Damaged roots Is ante from trunk c3 FV1 Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth-AZ-4- Poortaper Q/ Root plate IiftingJr%r Soil weakness Lean -LOL Corrected? �1 Response growth F�� TO Response growth ► ,4, A T"O Ar pet Main concern(s) Co 0I12dol 440,111 .vr- S'M;•D- Main concerns) T-V r R' L U 2V O t— Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant m- Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant Likelihood of failure - / Likelihood offailure / Improbable❑ Possible ❑ Probable Imminent ❑ Improbable❑ Possible ❑ Probable 9 Imminent 13 Maswi VA 00V Consulting Ai- borist �� � a 05 � &nice JWacGoy OL 41 71 1100 Bellevue Wrcy, , NE #293IDS • Belleime , Wushr igion , 98004 Tot f Risk Catenorization Conditions of concern Likelihood rating of part glop, ' 97 9P9 W,M AAdAAAAA WIW,W,AAAC �M �AAAl A C AACCAAAA AAX = �MM A AAAAAAAC7AAAAC0A M M W AAAA AGOG roll AnA AAAA M AAAAAA AACA 'Lei AA WjC0A� AA��A191Psi AC7 roll 7AC7 re, AA CDuu 9CCE CCO2 CC9. AAAA A lei AA C7 AAA AAAA M AAAA AAC7 A 17AAA AAAA� ���� AAAA AAAA C7 AAA AAAA � 0 AAAA AAAA C7 re, Ar7 ACAA 0 101A1*11011011011*1AAA AAAAA Eel � Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood of Failure Likelihood of Impacting Target Very low low Medium High imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely limprobablel Unlikely I Unlikely I Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Failure & Impact Consequences of Failure Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Low Low Notes, explanations, descriptions ConsultingArborist.USA@gmall.com t.Vc c.V b c..a i3,a-Aw 0 1&2•6y 6W X 'f- AA& o N 4 041-- 7 D PAIL-37, i++ kGA-Y CO tsp'ow r A0.'C VT- Owy0. North SeCWA; Ty �v GaTt 1 A /lea. Mitigation options 7-94 e- CoA Z 4. G 7T it 1-74 t R c. ty 4' e- c 13 e. JV o Residual risk dM,4A dR N Qyy medT%o~ re -A f o a W'4 cG 4 : f N Residual risk A e "U O ✓4-L • i4 Fr-t A /4 4e,K OVac. • Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low El Moderate ❑ High ❑ Extreme 0 Overall residual risk Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High xtreme ❑ Residual risk Work priority 1 ■ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ 4 ❑ Recommended inspection Interval _ Data ■ Final ❑ Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ■No ❑Yes-Type/Reason _ Inspection limitations ENone ❑Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe N/A N/A 6 Months. This datasheet was produced by the International Society otArboriculture (ISA) and is intended for use by Tree Risk Assessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborists - 2013 Page 2 of 2