2024-01-23 Council Packet2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
J oV GllM
Agenda
V J1
�ar Edmonds City Council
1,00 REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020
JANUARY 23, 2024, 7:00 PM
PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR
THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING
ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE:
HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261
OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261
THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A
VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY
DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO
UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND
OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL
MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39.
"WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH)
PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE
HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR
SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL
CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ROLL CALL
PRESENTATIONS
1. Edmonds Arts Commission Annual Report (20 min)
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE
AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO
THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE.
Edmonds City Council Agenda
January 23, 2024
Page 1
7. RECEIVED FOR FILING
1. Written Public Comments (0 min)
2. Outside Boards and Committee Reports (0 min)
3. September P&L Report (0 min)
8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of Special Meeting Minutes January 16, 2024
2. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes January 16, 2024
3. Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
4. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Update (20 min)
2. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Code Amendment (45 min)
3. Council Affirmation of Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics (5 min)
4. Ordinance to Conform Code to Salary Commission (10 min)
5. Resolution Providing 2024 Workplan Prioritization to Planning Board (15 min)
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT 10:00 PM
Edmonds City Council Agenda
January 23, 2024
Page 2
4.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Edmonds Arts Commission Annual Report
Staff Lead: Frances Chapin
Department: Arts Commission
Preparer: Laurie Rose
Background/History
The Edmonds Arts Commission (EAC) was established by City Council in 1975 (Ordinance 1765). The
seven -member, volunteer commission is appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by City Council. The
Commission is charged with advising and making recommendations to the Mayor and City Council, and
as appropriate, to other boards and commissions of the City on areas pertaining to the arts, including
representing the City in art matters, encouraging and aiding programs for cultural enrichment, and
providing advise and assistance in the field of art, aesthetics and beautification. The mission of the Arts
Commission is to ensure that the arts are integral to our community's quality of life, economic vitality,
and central identity.
Staff Recommendation
No action required
Narrative
The presentation by Arts Commission Chair Tanya Sharp includes highlights from EAC activities in 2022
and 2023. The Edmonds cultural community continues to work with impacts of the pandemic and the
EAC has made significant efforts to support our creative sector. The EAC is managed by the Cultural
Services division of the Community, Culture, and Economic Development Department.
Attachments:
2022-3 EAC annual report brochure final
Packet Pg. 3
LITERARY ARTS
Pandemic
restrictions inspired
development of a fully
online writers' conference.
The 37th annual Write on
the Sound (WOTS) in 2022
was presented online. It
featured authors Dana Spiotta and Shawn
Wong; an online half day workshop and two
days of 20 online sessions by writing and
publishing industry professionals. Community
sponsorships included Writing Contest awards
by Patricia Thorpe & Heather Krause/RBC
Wealth Management and an online bookshop
hosted by Edmonds Bookshop.
The 38th WOTS returned to a full, in -
person event in 2023, featuring best-selling
author Jamie Ford as keynote, a special
presentation by Rick Steves, and 33 sessions.
About 200 participants came from 11 different
states, with presenters from 13 states. The
conference included a virtual pre -conference
to provide greater accessibility to writers.
The Best Book I Ever Read
Poster Contest for third graders was
presented for the final time, after 20 years, as
an online exhibit in 2022.
POET'S PERSPECTIVE '
-A PROGRAM OF CITY OF EDMOND- ARTS COMMISSION
A new program, Poet's Perspective,
was introduced in 2022. Six poems were
selected through a competitive process and
exhibited at the Library, the Neighborhood
City Hall and other locations. In 2023 Poet's
Perspective selected six adult poets' work and
three youth poems for exhibition throughout
the year.
4.1.a
edmonds
ARTS COMMISSION
Founded in 1975, the City of Edmonds Arts
Commission (EAC) ensures the arts are
integral to our community's quality of life,
economic vitality, and central identity.
The City of Edmonds Arts Commission i
comprised of seven Edmonds volunteer residenl
appointed by Mayor and City Council. Four
commissioners are required to have a professiol
background in arts. Staff support is provided by
the Cultural Services Division of the Community,
Culture and Economic Development Dept. EAC
Programs include literary, performing, and visua
arts, and cultural and creative sector planning.
Annual revenue includes 25% of the Lodging Tay
funds (approx. $25,000), Percent for Art, prograi
revenues (WOTS), and sponsorships. EAC is
committed to providing accessible and diverse a
to the community.
EDMONDS CREATIVE DISTRICT
Certified by the State
the end of 2018, the Creative
F
0
0_
0
_
Q
0
.y
N
E
0
U
t=
Q
_
0
E
w
E D M O N D S District advisory committee
CREATIVE includes representatives from
DISTRICT
businesses, nonprofits, City v
commissions (including EAC) and individuals in tl w
downtown creative sector. In the first five years N
efforts focused on branding, marketing, and c
concept development for the 4th Avenue Cultur`14
Corridor. With partial grant funding from the
State, the final phase of concept development \N =E
completed in 2023.
City staffing for the District is provided a
through Economic Development and Cultural
Services. The required application for
recertification was submitted at
Packet Pg. 4
PERFORMING ARTS PUBLIC ART ARTS ASSISTANCE I 4.1.a
Summer concerts
in the parks returned to
in -person events in
summer 2022. Fourteen
free Hazel Miller Plaza
Summer Concerts,
A. I sponsored by Hazel Miller
Foundation, were
presented on Tuesday and
Thursday afternoons in
July and August in both
2022 and 2023. Sunday
Summer Concerts in the
Parks added a concert at
Hickman Park for 2022
and 2023. Additionally in 2023, a special original
composition for the tubular bells at Mika's
Playground was created and performed by
composer Ed Hartman (the sheet music is
available online for free).
VISUAL ARTS
After a 2-year COVID hiatus, the exhibit
spaces in the Frances Anderson Center resumed in
2022. The EAC Display Case featured Terry
Olmsted photography, and selections from the
Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation collection. 2023
shows included Art for All group show, Samantha
Saether bead artistry, Art Studio Tour group show,
Sculptor's Workshop group show, and wood cut
prints by Dan Cautrell.
W-M..
Partnership shows
r •+"' _ with EAF Gallery at the
Anderson Center included
selections from the Hekinan
Collection in 2022, and a
solo exhibit by longtime Edmonds artist d'Elaine
Johnson, and a group show by Sculptor's
Workshop in 2023.
The Edmonds Library Exhibit program
resumed when the library reopened with
selections from the Public Art Collection.
Temporary art
installations through the
outdoor On the Fence
program provided public
art opportunities for
artists and the
community throughout
the pandemic. Emerging and established artists
created visuals which stimulate conversation
about topics of interest, including
environmental concerns, social justice, and
sense of place. Installations at the FAC Field,
and ArtWorks fence in 2022 and 2023 included
work by Mona Smiley -Fairbanks, Tsovinar
Muradyan, Sophia Fang, Christy Carvaglio,
Brook Fotheringham and Nina Vichayapai.
The City Public Art Collection has over
60 outdoor artworks, including 29 unique
flower pole sculptures by regional artists. Over
100 pieces of two and three-dimensional
artworks are exhibited in public buildings.
In 2022, the Arts Commission received
14 significant donations to the portable Public
Art Collection and one significant exterior
installation. Two large artworks were accepted
by the Arts Commission from well-known local
artists. Donna Leavitt's graphite drawing "From
Darkness to Light II" (pictured above) is
exhibited in the City Hall lobby, and "Silent Sea"
by d'Elaine Johnson is on display in the City
Council office. A major donation of 12 artworks
from the Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation in
2022 included 6 sculptures and 6 paintings,
pastel, and prints.
In 2022, the
Floretum Garden Club
o donated a sculptural
7 installation, Fleurescence,
by Jennifer Kuhns through
the public art donation
process facilitated b
p Y the
Arts Commission.
The newest
public art installation,
cascadia, at Civic Center
Playfield Park, began in
2020 with a Call for
Artists and remote review
panel which selected five
finalists. Interviews were
conducted online in 2021
in a public process. The
selected artist, Clark
Wiegman, engaged in a variety of public
outreach events and presented his design
proposal to City Council for approval with a
public hearing in 2022. Cascadia was installed
in May 2023.
Maintenance of public art is a key
responsibility of the Arts Commission.
In 2022, several prominent sculptures were
cleaned and waxed including Snowy Owl by
Tony Angell. Over 70 solar elements were
replaced in the Luminous
Forest installation by Tole
Alessandrini on 4th
Avenue Cultural Corridor.
Other maintenance in
2022-2023 included
works at the fire station,
along the waterfront, and
the 12 Stages of History
art plaques in the
downtown.
Y&AVERs One Time
It "Create Grant Prograi
REALITY
In response to the
hardships of the
c
•; pandemic on arts and
40)
. culture organizations
and artists, $50,000 w
=
awarded over two yez
a
(2021-2022) to local artists and nonprofits
c
including a youth filmmaker who completed
'N
project at the end of 2022.
E
Tourism Promotion Awards totaled
o
$19,700 in 2022 and $20,000 for 2023. Eight
w
Edmonds arts organizations received EAC
Q
recommended awards from Lodging Tax fun(
to assist nonprofit organizations in rebuildin€
o
audience lost during the pandemic.
C
The EAC emailed its quarterly Arts
w
Bulletin newsletter to 1000 recipients, and t
WOTS Newsletter to 2200 recipients.
;S
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT o
& PARTNERSHIPS
t=
EAC partners include Edmonds Arts 0
CL
Festival/Foundation (visual art exhibits, publ
art acquisition and public art maintenance) -
Edmonds Center for the Arts (arts education =
and We Speak spoken word event); Sno-Isle
t�
Edmonds Library and Friends of the Edmonc w
Library (exhibits, WOTS poetry reading, Best c?
Book, Music at the Library); Puget Sound Biro N
Fest (photo exhibits); EPIC Group Writers N
(Write on the Sound); and local businesses.l m
EAC assisted with the organization of Arts & E
Heritage Day at the state capitol, presented r
information booth at the first Community a
Services Fair in 2023, and prepared recognitil
of the national October Arts & Humanities
month.
Packet Pg. 5
7.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Written Public Comments
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Acknowledge receipt of written public comments.
Narrative
Public comments submitted to the web form for public comments
<https://www.edmondswa.gov/publiccomment>
between January 11, 2024 and January 17, 2024.
Attachments:
Public Comment January 23, 2024
Packet Pg. 6
7.1.a
Edmonds City Council Public Comments —January 23, 2024
Online Form 2024-01-17 09:42 AM(MST) was submitted by Guest on 1/17/2024 11:42:22 AM (GMT-
07:00) US/Arizona
FirstName Clara
LastName Cleve
Email
CityOfResidence Edmonds
AgendaTopic Saving mature forests
Comments Dear Edmonds city council members, I would like you to vote to protect mature forests.
Mature forests are storing carbon, that protects our environment and our community. I would like you
to vote to not allow the cutting down of our mature forests. Sincerely, Clara Cleve
Online Form 2024-01-16 05:31 PM(MST) was submitted by Guest on 1/16/2024 7:31:44 PM (GMT-
07:00) US/Arizona
FirstName Darrol
LastName Haug
Email
CityOfResidence Edmonds, WA 98020
AgendaTopic Council meeting time changes
Comments Wow the last 2 pages of your 342 page packet tonight has an interesting new idea that
could help the public become more engaged with your work. An earlier start and stop time could help
folks not only see you at work but make more constructive public comments for you use. Bottom line
this item may be done at 10 tonight but in the future 9 pm will this on the agenda. Good work on sorting
out new ideas to enhance public input.
Packet Pg. 7
7.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Outside Boards and Committee Reports
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
Outside Boards and Committee Reports will be submitted to the Received for Filing portion of the
agenda for last meeting of the month.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
The Council is asked to review the attached committee reports/minutes from the following
organizations:
Edmonds Public Facilities District
Port of Edmonds
SNO-911
Snohomish County Tomorrow
Attachments:
pfd-board-meeting-minutes-10-26-2023
Port Of Edmonds _ Commission Meeting Minutes 12-11-23
SCT Steering committee Oct 24 2023
SNO911-Board-Agenda-20240118
Packet Pg. 8
7.2.a
Edmonds Public Facilities District
Board of Directors Meeting
October 26, 2023
The Edmonds Public Facilities District Board hybrid meeting convened at 7:41 a.m. in the Edmonds
Center for the Arts Green Room, 410 4th Avenue North, Edmonds, and via Zoom.
EPFD Board Members Present
Ray Liaw, President
Bill Willcock, Vice President
Suzy Maloney
David Brewster
Wayne Grotheer
ECA Board Members Present
David Schaefer, President
1. Call to Order
ECA Staff Present
Lori Meagher, Interim Executive Director
Guests
Will Chen, City Council Liaison
Board President Liaw called the meeting to order.
• Attendance of those attending in person for minutes.
2. Land Acknowledgement & Equity Statement
Board Member Brewster read the Land Acknowledgement Statement and the Equity Statement
3. Board President's Comments
• Agenda Review & Approval
BOARD MEMBER BREWSTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. BOARD VP WILLCOCK
SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Board President Liaw reported November will include the Gala on November 17 and welcoming new
ED Kathy Liu. She reminded board members to complete OPMA training and submit their certificate of
OPMA training/refresher to Lexie Marsters.
4. Public Comment
There was no public comment.
5. Consent Agenda
• EPFD Board Meeting Minutes: September 28, 2023
• EPFD Disbursement Report: September 2023
BOARD VP WILLCOCK MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. BOARD MEMBER
MALONEY SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
October 26, 2023
Page I
Packet Pg. 9
7.2.a
6. Old Business
• Prior Action Items Review
Ms. Meagher reviewed progress on action items from the previous meeting and identified outstanding
items (see Action Items below).
• October Staff Report — Questions/Comments?
Board members commended staff for all their hard work and for assembling a very informative report.
7. PFD Board Business
• Resolution #2023-1 Appointment of Agent to Receive Claims for Damages
Ms. Meagher explained the resolution authorizes appointment of an agent to receive claims for
damages, a standard document required for liability insurance. Joe Mclalwain was the previous agent
so with his departure, the agent needed to be updated.
BOARD MEMBER BREWSTER MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2023-1 AUTHORIZING
APPOINTMENT OF LORI MEAGHER AS THE AGENT TO RECEIVE CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES.
BOARD MEMBER GROTHEER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
• Executive Director Transition/Onboarding Update
Ms. Meagher reported staff is preparing for Ms. Liu's arrival. At Ms. Liu's request, a meeting has been
scheduled with department heads and staff. An onboarding plan has been developed in coordination
with the Leadership Transition Team and the Steering Committee that will be shared with Ms. Liu for
her feedback.
Board President Liaw reported ECA Board President Lindsay Geyer and she plan to meet with Ms. Liu
on her first day to provide a formal welcome from the EPFD and ECA boards. Board presidents and
vice presidents plan to meet with her to provide board level mentorship/support/guidance during the
first 90 days and although the onboarding plan ends at 90 days, she hoped that small group could
continue to work with Ms. Liu. A public event will be held in January. Councilmember Chen offered to
meet with Ms. Liu on her first day on behalf of the City.
• AWSPFD Conference
Board Member Brewster reported on the conference held in Kennewick September 27-29. He will send
board members a link to a Dropbox file with information from the conference.
➢ Edmonds, Lynnwood and Everett will cohost the conference in September 2024
■ Second or third week of September
■ Have received an offer for a sponsorship
➢ Presentations from parties pertinent to the PFDs' work and existence
1. Lobbyist Jim Hedrick
a. Beginning discussions and engagement with legislators about extending legislation to
2051, the vision for the ECA campus, etc.
b. Legislature passed a bill in 2023 allowing 2 or more contiguous towns or counties with a
PFD to build a second PFD. Wenatchee plans to form a second PFD
c. Forecasted increase in sales tax revenues
d. The 2021 tax rebate to PFDs totaled approximately $40 million; the four PFDs in
Snohomish County received the largest portion, $7.5 million
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
October 26, 2023
Page 2
Packet Pg. 10
7.2.a
e. PFD needs to connect with Mr. Hedrick and begin forming a strategy to connection with
legislators
2. Marc Greenough, bond counsel
a. Restrictions on bond issuance with and without voter approval (1/2% of assessed value
bonds can be issued without voter approval, up to 1.25% of the assessed value requires
voter approval)
3. Enduris, liability insurer
a. Trips and falls
b. Documenting any incidents
4. Department of Commerce
a. Will do a financial feasibility review whenever the PFD issues bonds
5. Auditor's Office
a. Reviewed the work they do for PFDs
6. Department of Tourism
a. Cited encouraging statistics that tourism is returning to 2019 levels
b. $3 billion in tax revenue in 2021 from tourism
7. Architect & Design Build firm
a. Practices around designing and building facilities are moving away from design/bid/build
process.
b. Under current process, an architect is hired to design a project which is sent out to bid,
price is agreed upon and the process typically results in additional unforeseen costs.
c. With the new process, which many architects and builders support, is more collaborative;
the client and architect work together and the contractor is brought in earlier in the
process. Typically costs less, takes less time, and there is a happier client at the
conclusion.
8. Lynnwood PFD
a. Presented their expansion plans which include a hotel, two multifamily buildings, retail
and expanded convention center
Ms. Meagher commented on the presentation regarding the design/build process. The conference was
a great experience and included a tour of Toyota Center and driving the Zamboni. It was interesting to
hear from the other PFDs and their challenges, working together with the legislature, and ways PFD
facilities benefit the state, county and city.
Discussion followed regarding funding for Lynnwood PFDs expansion, PFDs that are members of the
AWSPFD (14 of the 20), unpaid association dues, Snohomish County PFDs taking on leadership of the
organization, opportunity for stronger leadership of the organization, Snohomish County PFDs co -
hosting next year's conference, and ability for PFD members to attend the conference. With regard to
an action item at a previous meeting, Appointment of a PFD Member to the AWSPFD, Board Member
Brewster expressed interest in continuing to represent the EPFD on the AWSPFD.
8. PFD Committee Reports
Board VP Willcock reported he participated in the Philanthropy Committee and Gala procurement; that
team is on target for the upcoming Gala and he enjoys their energy and the work they are doing.
Board Member Maloney reported the Philanthropy Committee is focused on the Gala and are doing a
terrific job. She looked forward to expanding the committee's focus after the Gala. She reported the 4tn
Avenue Committee has not met.
Board Member Grotheer reported the IDEA Committee is meeting next week. The Facilities and
Operation Committee toured the building today. Mithun's work is delayed due to the intensive work on
the ECA building that begins today.
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
October 26, 2023
Page 3
Packet Pg. 11
7.2.a
Board President Liaw reported the Hosting Committee did not meet this month; the committee is working
on a policy for the new Mclalwain Equity Access Fund. Yesterday's Admin & Finance Committee
meeting was primarily focused on the 2024 budget. Admin & Finance plans to review the procurement
policies to incorporate a minor statutory amendment that takes effect next year and other internal
changes related to authorizing contracts. Ms. Meagher will circulate the existing handbook/procurement
policy so board members can familiarize themselves with it before changes are proposed. The
Leadership Transition Team will be winding down in the next 1-2 months and will be documenting their
process, lessons learned, etc.
Discussion followed regarding whether Ms. Liu's onboarding plan included opportunities for her to get
to know the area in a more casual, informal way; introducing her to key community partners, volunteers,
etc.; and possibly involving board members and/or key community members in helping Ms. Liu get to
know the community.
9. Interim Executive Director Updates
• Finance Update
o ECA IRS Examination
Ms. Meagher reported the IRS examiner was on site for approximately 1.5 hours to verify the ECA is
operating as a tax exempt organizations. The audit was triggered by the listing of donor advised funds
on Form 990. The IRS's interpretation of donor advised funds is a donor contributes to a organization
and identifies a specific purpose which the ECA calls restricted funds. Donor advised funds in
QuickBooks are third party distribution such as an investment firm. That has been updated in
QuickBooks and the ECA does not need to refile for 2020 or 2021 and staff is updating the system for
2022 and beyond. A second trigger for the examination was the IRS did not show the ECA filed a
1099/1096 return for 2020. She was able to locate it and provide it to the examiner. However, when she
audited the 2020 vendors, she identified 6 additional 1099s that should have been issued. The examiner
will verify that those need to be reissued. A third trigger for the examination was a 1099 was not issued
to the CPA firm that prepared the 990. The examiner had no concerns and said the ECA was operating
as a tax exempt organization. She responded to a question regarding whether there would be any
impact on donors who use donor advised funds to make donations to the ECA.
o Grant Analysis
Ms. Meagher reported she is working with the grant writer on this analysis. Board VP Willcock requested
it be circulated to the EPFD Board prior to the next PFD meeting.
o September Financials
Ms. Meagher reviewed the Financial Dashboard, income statement — key amounts, highlighting
contributions revenue, rentals and presented event revenue; grant applications awaiting response. She
reviewed operating expenses, highlighting presenting events and concessions, payroll and employee
benefits, other operating expenses, and total surplus (loss).
o FY 2024 Budget— 1st Draft
Ms. Meagher presented the 2024 preliminary budget, highlighting opportunities, challenges and
assumptions:
➢ Operating revenue and expenses
■ 39 presented events, 80% are booked or in final negotiations
■ FTEs increase slightly due to increased shows and rentals
■ Budget assumes 3% COLA for all staff and a few market adjustments based on a market
analysis
■ Insurance premiums increased 9.5%, considering how to equitably compensate staff for that.
Will be reflected in next budget proposal.
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
October 26, 2023
Page 4
Packet Pg. 12
7.2.a
■ Investing in resources such as calendaring software, possibly upgrading development
software
■ Consulting for strategic plan and IDEA initiatives
■ Increase in audit fees
➢ Non -operating revenue and expenses
■ Implementation of GASB 87 (leases) and 96 (software subscriptions
■ Interest on City of Edmonds operating loan will remain high at 5.6%
■ Capital expenditures - $200,000 for estimated building upgrades
Questions and discussion followed regarding opportunity for increased rental income by adding FTEs
and new software, support for increasing FTEs in Rental, impact of additional presentations on the
production team and volunteers, increase in FTEs in 2024 compared to 2023, budgeting for a portion
of the 5-year strategic plan in 2024, cost to mitigate mold in the building, whether $200,000 for building
upgrades identified in Building Condition Assessment will be adequate, and including an estimate in the
budget for ongoing capital maintenance.
Ms. Meagher reviewed the 2025-2029 Future Years Projections, anticipating based on projections in
the preliminary budget that the organization will begin operating in the black in 2029. Two debt services
will be paid off in 2029. She will also prepare a 2025-2029 projection for each department.
Questions and discussion continued regarding average inflation for revenues and expenses, top three
worries in the budget, a request to review the 2025-2029 projections again at the next meeting, timeline
for approving the budget, board members sending questions to Ms. Meagher in advance of the
November 30 meeting, and EPFD members attending Admin & Finance meetings when the budget is
discussed.
• Human Resources
o Hiring Update
• Ticket Sales Update
o Season Analysis 22-23 to 18-19
Staff will provide an update at next month's meeting.
• Development Update
o Gala
Ms. Meagher reported planning is going well and there are no concerns.
o Year -End
Ms. Meagher reported this will be done by the consultant grant writer so the development team can
focus on the Gala.
(Board VP Willcock left the meeting at 9:04 am.)
10. New Business
11. Adjourn
The meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a.m.
Next EPFD Board Meeting: Thursday, November 30, 2023 - 7:30 AM
ACTION ITEMS:
1. November meeting
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
October 26, 2023
Page 5
Packet Pg. 13
7.2.a
a. 2024 budget
b. Review 2025-2029 projections
c. Ticket Sales Update
2. Prepare analysis of ticket sales'22-23 compared to '18-19
3. Create grant spreadsheet with analysis of available grants versus grants applied for and grants
received. Circulate to EPFD Board prior to the next meeting
4. Create policy regarding use of funds in the Mclalwain Access Fund
5. Send Onboarding Plan to ED Kathy Liu for her feedback
6. Amend procurement policy to reflect statutory amendment taking effect in 2024 and internal
changes related to authorizing contracts
a. Circulate existing procurement handbook/policy to EPFD Board so they can familiarize
themselves with it before changes are proposed
7. Consider informal ways to introduce/welcome ED Liu to the community
8. Consider in the 2024 budget how to equitably compensate staff for increase in insurance
premiums
9. EPFD board members invited to attend admin & finance committee meetings where 2024
budget will be reviewed. Notice admin & finance committee meetings as special EPFD Board
meetings if a quorum of EPFD board members attend
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes
October 26, 2023
Page 6
Packet Pg. 14
1/18/24, 3:20 PM Port Of Edmonds I Commission Meeting Minutes 12-11-23
PORT COMMISSION OF THE PORT OF EDMONDS MINUTES OF
REGULAR MEETING
(Zoom —Hybrid Meeting) December 11, 2023
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT
Steve Johnston, President y
Jim Orvis, Vice President
r_
0_
Jay Grant, Secretary
m
m
m
Janelle Cass
E
David Preston
o
U
c
STAFF PRESENT
Angela Harris, Executive Director
o
Brandon Baker, Deputy Executive Director
0
°°
Brittany Williams, Manager of Properties and Economic
y
Development
0
o
M
Roger Neumaier, Acting Finance Director `,'
OTHERS PRESENT
Jordan Stephens, Port Attorney
Greg Ferguson, Edmonds Marsh Estuary Advocates
Bill Derry, Edmonds Marsh Estuary Advocates
Andor Boeck, Edmonds Yacht Club
I. CALL TO ORDER
President Johnston called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. FLAG SALUTE
All those in attendance participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to
the American Flag.
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COMMISSIONER GRANT MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDAAS
SUBMITTED. COMMISSIONER CASS SECONDED THE MOTION,
WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-12-11-23/ Packet Pg. 15
1/18/24, 3:20 PM Port Of Edmonds I Commission Meeting Minutes 12-11-23
IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
V. CONSENT AGENDA
COMMISSIONER ORVIS MOVED THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA
BE APPROVED TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
A. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 27, 2023 MEETING MINUTES
B. APPROVAL OF PAYMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $351,027.46
COMMISSIONER PRESTON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
VI. PRESENTATIONS
A. Recognition of Commissioner Orvis
Commissioner Johnston announced that at the Washington Public
Port Association's winter meeting, WPPA President, Ryan Calkins,
presented Commissioner Orvis with the "Outstanding Service to the
Port Industry Award." Commissioner Johnston shared the
complementary citation that accompanied the award and thanked
Commissioner Orvis for his nearly 20 years of service as a Port
Commissioner.
Commissioner Orvis commented that, over his 20 years as a Port
Commissioner, he has worked with some very dedicated, talented,
hardworking people.
B. Climate Planning and Marsh Restoration - Greg Ferguson
and Bill Derry
Executive Director Harris introduced Mr. Ferguson and Mr. Derry
and shared details about their background and experience. Both are
https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-12-11-23/ Packet Pg. 16
1/18/24, 3:20 PM Port Of Edmonds I Commission Meeting Minutes 12-11-23
memoers of the community voiunteer group, tamonas iviarsn
Estuary Advocates.
7.2.b
Mr. Derry presented the group's proposal for restoring the Unocal
site into a marsh and/or estuary and cutting a channel through
Marina Beach Park under the existing railroad bridges to restore an
estuary flow in and out of the marsh. He shared a Department of
Ecology (DOE) map and letter and described the status of the site
cleanup and potential risk to a future owner.
Mr. Ferguson focused his presentation on the impacts of sea level
rise along the Edmonds Waterfront and marsh, framing the
problems and pointing out the need for adaptation planning to
minimize waterfront flood risks. He briefly shared a variety of ideas
for protecting coastal communities and stressed the importance of
incorporating information related to sea level rise into future updates
of the Port's Strategic Plan and the City of Edmonds'
Comprehensive Plan. Executive Director Harris advised that Port
staff is currently conducting outreach to other ports and
stakeholders to begin discussions around planning for future sea
level rise.
Mr. Derry shared details of a City project that will start in January
and involve updating the hydrologic and hydraulic model and
verifying flood elevations; collecting, summarizing and verifying the
risks from contamination; and identifying a path forward for public
planning and public involvement. Funding for the project will come
from a Coastal Cities Resiliency Using Natural Solutions Grant the
City recently received from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), as well as a local match from a number of
sources. In addition to the dedication of staff time by Executive
Director Harris, he asked the Port Commission to consider a
financial contribution of up to $25,000.
VII. POSSIBLE ACTION
There were no action items on the agenda.
https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-12-11-23/
Packet Pg. 17
1/18/24, 3:20 PM Port Of Edmonds I Commission Meeting Minutes 12-11-23 7 2 b
VIII. INFORMATION
A. 3rd Quarter Financial Reports
Mr. Neumaier shared about his positive experiences while serving
as interim Finance Director for the Port, particularly noting the
phenomenal support from other staff members. He briefly presented
the 3rd Quarter Financial Report, summarizing that the Port is well
managed and he found no significant concerns. He also reviewed
the Investing Summary and the Port's current investment strategy.
IX. CITY OF EDMONDS, TOWN OF WOODWAY, AND EDMONDS
YACHT CLUB REPORT
Andor Boeck, Edmonds Yacht Club, invited everyone to visit the
marina during the Holiday on the Docks event.
X. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Harris reported on the following items:
• New Administration Building Project. They are expecting the HVAC
=
0
units for the new Administration Building to arrive by Christmas, and
N
work will resume at that time. They anticipate moving into the
E
E
building by the end of February.
0
v
i
• North Portwalk and Seawall Restoration Project. The Substantial
Shoreline and Design Review Applications were resubmitted on
E
December 4th, and they are aiming to have 90% design for grant
M
4-
O
application submittal by the end of February. They are working
c
through three remaining elements of the Joint Aquatic Resource
a
Permit Application (JARPA): water quality certification, historic
_
resources consultation, and mitigation consultation. Mr. Menard is
s
working with CG Engineering on a plan for monitoring the existing
a
seawall, as he feels there has been some movement this past year.
Staff is working with the project team to prepare document for grant
applications. They are also continuing their advocacy plan for grant
support from congressional and state delegations, the community
Packet Pg. 18
https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-12-11-23/
1/18/24, 3:20 PM
Port Of Edmonds I Commission Meeting Minutes 12-11-23
7.2.b
and other key stakeholders.
• Calendar Reminders. The Staff and Commissioner Orvis
Appreciation Event is scheduled for December 14th at Salish
Crossing from 3:30 to 6:00 p.m. The Port's public event at the
marina will follow. The Administration Office will be closed from
December 22nd through December 26th.
• Strategic Planning. The first Strategic Plan Workshop will be held
on January 31st, followed by a second one in March.
XI. COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
• Commissioner Preston reported on his attendance at the WPPA
Winter Meeting. He also reported that he attended the Economic
Alliance of Snohomish County's (EASC) trustee meeting. He advised
that he would attend both the Edmonds Economic Development
Commission meeting and the EASC Coffee Chat on December 12th.
• On behalf of the Commission, Commissioner Grant presented
Commissioner Orvis with a John Kelly Liberty Ship stereograph with
an accompanying plaque honoring his years of dedication and
exceptional service to the community. The intent is to display the
ship in the new Commission office so people will always know the
great job that Commissioner Orvis did.
• Commissioner Grant reported on his attendance at two of the
City's Comprehensive Plan public meetings. One focused on the
waterfront and downtown Edmonds and the other was on Firdale.
He provided a brief update on the current status of the City's
proposed Landmark Project and reported on a conversation he had
with a State Auditor related to cyber management. He also reported
on his attendance at the WPPA Winter Meeting, where an
engineering firm shared what is available through an AutoCAD
program.
• Commissioner Orvis commented that during his time on the
Commission, the group has always been a healthy, supportive and
respectful organization with a bright future. He encouraged them to
continue this same pattern going forward. He has treasured his time
on the Commission.
• Commissioner Johnston shared some of the things that were
rlisrusserl at the WPPA Winter Meetinn relaterl to mitinatinn
https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-12-11-23/
Packet Pg. 19
1/18/24, 3:20 PM
Port Of Edmonds I Commission Meeting Minutes 12-11-23
requirements, rising marina costs, and reallocation of Model Toxic
Control Act funds.
• Commissioner Cass reported on things she learned at the City's
Downtown/Waterfront Neighborhood comprehensive planning. She
also reported on her attendance at the WPPA's New Commissioner
Training Meeting, as well as the WPPA's Winter Meeting where she
learned about Tsunami modeling done by the Washington State
Emergency Management Division, including a pamphlet for boaters
about what to do in a Tsunami. She will be following up with a
representative to discuss potential modeling of the Edmonds
Waterfront.
XII. WORKSHOP
There were no workshop items on the agenda.
XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
At 21:02, Commissioner Johnston announced that the Commission
would move into an Executive Session pursuant to RCW
42.30.110(1)(g) to review the performance of a public employee. He
advised that the Executive Session would start at 21:03 and would
last 30 minutes, concluding at 21:33, and no expected action would
be taken after the session. At 21:33, Commissioner Johnston
announced that the Executive Session would be extended 10
minutes to 21:43. The Executive Session concluded at 21:43, at
which time the Commission returned to the regular meeting to
adjourn.
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
The Commission meeting was adjourned at 9:43 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jay Grant
7.2.b
Port Commission Secretary
https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-12-11-23/
Packet Pg. 20
1/18/24, 3:20 PM Port Of Edmonds I Commission Meeting Minutes 12-11-23 7 2 b
TAGS: 2023 Port of Edmonds Commission Meeting
Minutes, 3rd Quarter Financial Reports, Climate Planning
and Marsh Restoration — Greg Ferguson and Bill Derry,
New Administration Building Project, North Portwalk and
Seawall Restoration Project, Recognition of Commissioner
Orvis, Strategic Planning
https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-12-11-23/ 1 Packet Pg. 21
I 7.2.c I
Stanwood Darrington
Tulalip Arlington
Tribes
Granite Falls
Marysville
Snohomish County Tomorrow
Everett Lake Stevens
ukilteo Mill Creek
Lynnwood Snohomish
A GR O WTH MANA GEMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL
Edmonds Mountlake Monroe
Terrace Sultan Gold Intlex
Woodway Brier Bothell Bar
1
2.
3
STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING
Wednesday, October 25, 2023
Via Zoom
6:00 p.m.
MEETING MINUTES
Particiaatina Jurisdictions/Members
City of Darrin ton
Mayor Dan Rankin
City of Edmonds
Councilmember Vivian Olson
City of Granite Falls
Councilmember Matt Hartman
City of Lynnwood
Councilmember Patrick Decker
City of Mill Creek
Mayor Pro Tern Stephanie Vi nal
City of Mountlake Terrace
Mayor Pro Tern Bryan Wahl
City of Snohomish
Councilmember Karen Guzak
Snohomish County Council
Councilmember Jared Mead
City of Gold Bar
Councilmember Chuck Lie
Snohomish County Executive
Josh Du an
Community Representative
Mike Appleby
Community Representative
Linda Hoult
Community Representative
Allan Giffen
Community Representative
Peter Battuello
Other Attendees/Presenters:
Puget Sound Regional Council
Gary Simonson
Puget Sound Regional Council
Ben Bakkenta
Snohomish County
Kristin Banfield
SCT Manager
Ann Larson
Economic Alliance of Snohomish
Count
Garry Clark
Economic Alliance of Snohomish
Count
Rashma Agarwal
Landrum & Brown
Michael Tubrid
Community Member
Melody Tucker
Snohomish County
Terry Ryan
Call to Order:
The meeting was called to order at 6:01 pm by Josh Dugan.
Introductions/Roll Call
Roll call was taken (as listed above).
Citizen Comments
Packet Pg. 22
7.2.c
No comments.
4. Approval of Meeting Minutes (9-27-23)
Bryan Wahl moved to approve the minutes. Karen Guzak seconded, and the motion
passed unanimously.
5. Update Items
a. Summary of PSRC Board Actions and Activities, Ben Bakkenta/ Gary
Simonson
Bakkenta shared that PSRC's Executive Board plans to meet for a briefing and
discussion to prepare for the upcoming 2024 regional project selection grant process.
b. Economic Alliance Snohomish County Update from Garry Clark, President,
and Chief Executive Officer
Clark shared that they have been facilitating a Swedish delegation that is exploring
foreign investments in the region. In 2024, a German delegation is also planning to visit
the region as well. EASC changed the name of the BIPOC Chamber to the Opportunity
Chamber. Clark and Agarwal provided an update on upcoming EASC events.
6. Briefings, Discussion Items
a. Landrum & Brown, Michael Tubridy
Tubridy provide and update on the Master Plan for the Airport.
b. Puget Sound Regional Council, Gary Simonson
Simonson provided and update on PSRC's Regional Roadway Safety plan.
c. SCT Manager's Report
SCT Manager Ann Larson shared the October SCT Committee's Report.
7. Next Meeting Date
December 6, 2023
8. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:09pm by Josh Dugan.
All presentations given, discussions held, and actions taken at this meeting are kept on file (via recording) in PDS until six years
from December 315t of this year.
Packet Pg. 23
7.2.d
SNOHOMISH
COUNTY
SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BOARD MEETING AGENDA
January 18, 2024 at 8:30 a.m.
F3V%Q31UJ Web Conference — Join Zoom Meeting
https://uso2web.zoom.us/i/86274396181
Meeting ID: 860 00
46 6014, Passcode: 195881
or dial +1 253 215 8782
Physical location: 1121 SE Everett Mall Way, Everett Police Department, South Precinct.
Please note that most Board members and staff attend the meeting remotely. However,
pursuant to RCW 42.30, a physical location is also provided.
1. Call to Order
A. Roll Call
B. Announcements
2. Public Comments [Max 3 min. per speaker related to agency business]
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Consent Agenda
A. Minutes from the December 21, 2023 Regular Board Meeting
B. December 2023 Blanket Voucher & Payroll Approval Form:
i. Checks 1028 - 1031, 18246 - 18361, for a total of $2,013,041.61
ii. Payroll Direct Deposit, in the amount of $1,249,257.27
C. RRP: Subscriber and Inventory Support Funding Amendment
5. Old Business
A. Future Facility Budget & GMP
6. New Business
A. Appointive Staff Policy Updates
7. 2024 Planning
A. Committee Vacancies
B. Bi-Annual Board Member Caucuses
C. Proposal for In -Person Board Meetings (2/15, 4/18, 8/15 & 10/17)
8. Reports
A. Agency Report
B. New Facility Project Update
C. Radio Replacement Project (RRP)
D. Police TAC
E. Fire TAC
Packet Pg. 24
7.2.d
9. Committee Reports
A. Joint Future Facility & Finance Committee
B. Personnel Committee
C. EMS Joint Task Force
D. County EESCS Committee (formerly County E911 Office)
E. County ECSF Program Advisory Board
10. Executive Session (If Needed)
11. Good of the Order
12. Adjourn - The next meeting is scheduled for February 15, 2024
Packet Pg. 25
7.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
September P&L Report
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Dave Turley
Background/History
September P&L report.
Staff Recommendation
Information only.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
Jan -Sept 2023 P&L
Packet Pg. 26
7.3.a
GENERAL FUND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Preliminary
2022
(Jan -Sept)
2023
(Jan -Sept)
Beginning Fund Balance
10,273,342
11,233,279
15,552,188
13,868,744
15,915,322
15,915,322
11,902,955
Revenue
Taxes
30,755,578
30,846,665
30,738,452
32,979,704
34,209,103
22,538,625
23,486,944
Licenses and permits
2,401,855
2,299,972
2,276,861
2,453,186
2,560,170
1,940,066
1,629,358
Intergovernmental
1,014,434
1,008,432
1,633,633
1,608,646
1,367,288
1,050,462
1,112,179
Charges for services
5,810,961
6,419,836
5,412,044
5,913,557
3,020,623
4,384,598
5,809,867
Fines and forfeitures
616,783
496,093
287,693
272,302
182,881
116,322
146,188
Interest earnings
273,228
573,806
265,627
122,257
(34,099)
191,717
180,587
Miscellaneous
931,495
587,882
322,816
347,519
368,221
310,943
442,936
Operating Revenues
Nonoperatine Revenues
Transfers in
Debt proceeds
Sale of capital assets
Contracts
Insurance recoveries
Total Revenue
Expenditures
General government
Public safety
Transportation
Economic environment
Mental and physical health
Culture and recreation
Debt service
Capital outlay
Operating Expenditures
Nonoperating Expenditures
Leases
Transfers out
Debt refunding
Total Expenditures
Prior Period Adjustments
Change in position
41,804,334
42,232,686 40,937,126 43,697,171
41,674,187
30,532,733 32,808,060
75,884
4,793,650 1,535,800 388,547
26,300
13,150 97,066
5,273
- -
-
-
-
- -
482,709
15,570
- 16,977 -
257,520
- 722,723
41,901,061
47,026,336 42,489,903 44,085,718
42,440,716
30,545,883 33,627,848
10,288,694
11,565,563
12,514,526
11,866,885
9,821,698
9,304,352
11,336,568
22,585,212
23,036,185
23,759,212
22,765,260
26,107,688
19,476,923
23,801,502
4,779
5,012
5,012
2,088
-
-
-
1,460,763
1,562,702
1,675,334
1,991,624
2,245,945
1,573,686
2,139,466
178,859
164,888
147,957
84,642
38,676
34,724
68,839
4,331,806
4,158,397
3,732,644
4,341,658
4,926,663
3,519,496
4,562,725
197,694
197,967
296,624
60,228
321,989
72,505
65,733
93,105
110,935
835,048
268,885
1,605,828
155,426
488,941
39,140,912 40,801,649 42,966,358 41,381,270 45,068,487 34,137,113 42,463,775
- - - - 69,534 - -
1,800,212 1,905,778 1,206,990 657,870 1,315,062 542,500 986,522
40,941,124 42,707,427 44,173,348 42,039,140 46,453,083 34,679,613 43,450,297
959,937 4,318,909 (1,683,445) 2,046,578 (4,012,367) (4,133,730) (9,822,449)
Ending Fund Balance 11,233,279 15,552,188 13,868,744 15,915,322 11,902,955 11,781,593 2,080,506
F
0
m
J
06
a
L
d
E
0
Q
m
J
06
(L
M
N
0
N
r-.
Q
4)
to
C
R
C
d
E
t
V
R
Q
R:\Finance Committee\2023\Jan-Sept 2023 P&L 1/18/2024 Packet Pg. 27
8.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Approval of Special Meeting Minutes January 16, 2024
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Nicholas Falk
Background/History
N/A
Recommendation
Approval of Council Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
Council meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
2024-01-16 Council Special Meeting
Packet Pg. 28
8.1.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
DRAFT MINUTES
January 16, 2024
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Rosen, Mayor
Vivian Olson, Council President
Neil Tibbott, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Michelle Dotsch, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Chris Eck, Councilmember
Jenna Nand, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER
STAFF PRESENT
Sharon Cates, City Attorney
Scott Passey, City Clerk
The special Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Mayor Rosen in the Council
Chambers, 250 5'a' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually.
2. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY, RCW
42.30.140(4)(A),
The Council then convened in closed session to discuss collective bargaining strategy per RCW
42.30.140(4)(a).
The executive session concluded at 6:43 p.m.
3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION
The meeting reconvened at 6:43 p.m.
4. ADJOURN
With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 6:43 p.m.
SCOTT PASSEY, CITY CLERK
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 1
Packet Pg. 29
8.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes January 16, 2024
Staff Lead: Council
Department: City Clerk's Office
Preparer: Nicholas Falk
Background/History
N/A
Recommendation
Approval of Council Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda.
Narrative
Council meeting minutes are attached.
Attachments:
2024-01-16 Council Minutes
Packet Pg. 30
8.2.a
EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DRAFT MINUTES
January 16, 2024
ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT
Mike Rosen, Mayor
Vivian Olson, Council President
Chris Eck, Councilmember
Will Chen, Councilmember
Neil Tibbott, Council President
Michelle Dotsch, Councilmember
Susan Paine, Councilmember
Jenna Nand, Councilmember
1. CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE
STAFF PRESENT
Michelle Bennett, Police Chief
Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director
Susan McLaughlin, Planning & Dev. Dir.
Todd Tatum, Comm., Culture & Econ. Dev. Dir
Rob English, City Engineer
Jerry Shuster, Stormwater Engineer
Jeff Taraday, City Attorney
Nicholas Falk, Deputy Clerk
Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator
The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 7 p.m. by Mayor Rosen in the Council Chambers,
250 5' Avenue North, Edmonds, and virtually. The meeting was opened with the flag salute.
2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Councilmember Chen read the City Council Land Acknowledge Statement: "We acknowledge the original
inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who
since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their
sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land
and water."
3. ROLL CALL
Deputy Clerk Nicholas Falk called the roll. All elected officials were present.
4. PRESENTATIONS
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO NEIL TIBBOTT FOR SERVICE AS COUNCIL
PRESIDENT
On behalf of the city council, Council President Olson read a resolution commending and thanking
Councilmember Tibbott for his service as council president from January to December 2023.
Councilmember Tibbott thanked the council for their support during new experiences and job
responsibilities. He recalled a couple times when leading meetings that the council saved him and thanked
the council for their support. He looked forward to this year under Council President Olson's leadership
and the opportunity to work together.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 1
Packet Pg. 31
8.2.a
2. KOREAN AMERICAN DAY PROCLAMATION
Mayor Rosen read a proclamation proclaiming January 13, 2024 as Korean American Day in Edmonds. He
thanked Councilmember Chen for reading Edmonds' proclamation as part of the Koren Day celebration
and officially presenting it to them.
3. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. DAY
Mayor Rosen asked Donnie Griffin, the organizer of Life Every Voice Legacy, to join him at the podium.
Mayor Rosen read a proclamation acknowledging Martin Luther King Jr. Day and calling upon the people
of Edmonds to reflect upon their individual attitudes and prejudices and to establish or renew their
commitments to equal justice under the law and respect for their fellow human beings. He presented the
proclamation to Mr. Griffin.
Mr. Griffin thanked Mayor Rosen and the council for the this very special proclamation. Over the six years
he has been involved in the celebration, he and the community were thankful for having seen most
councilmembers, either involved with him personally or with Lift Every Voice. Dr. King left the recipe for
love and for a Beloved Community. The council and mayor are the representatives of that Beloved
Community in all they do publicly. When they agree or disagree respectfully, the public will follow them,
more than they will follow him. He embraced the notion of a Beloved Community as a way of life and
asked the council to embrace it as leaders of the City. Others will see that, seeing it even more when the
council disagrees with each other. The legacy of Dr. King rests on the council.
4. POLICE PRESENTATION ON 2024-183 INVESTIGATION
Police Chief Michelle Bennett provided an update regarding the recent homicide investigation and some
much needed thank yous related to the investigation. She provided a brief synopsis of the crime, Abdikadir
Shariif was killed just after 10:15 pm on January 3, 2024. He was working as rideshare driver and had just
dropped off a couple returning from vacation. He drove westbound on 236t' and with a green signal, began
making a left turn. The suspect was crossing Edmonds Way west to east. Mr. Shariif entered the crosswalk
during his turn. There was a near miss with the vehicle, the victim began to roll down his window to say he
was sorry, and without warning, the suspect fired multiple times at Mr. Shariif, mortally wounding him and
he later died at Harborview Hospital.
During the investigation, detectives received multiple tips from various sources including online,
anonymously, phone calls, etc. The community was asked for information and responded in mass providing
information. She thanked the community members who responded. Detectives followed up on numerous
tips, often working 15 hour days, wrote numerous search warrants and were able to recover physical, digital
and other types of evidence. On January 10, 2024, a suspect was arrested, an unusually short amount of
time, 6 days, to make an arrest in a stranger, no information, no suspect crime. She offered a big thank you
to the police department and their investigation. The suspect was arrested without incident by members of
the Snohomish County Violent Offenders Task as he walked away from his residence. At the time of his
arrest, the suspect was armed with two handguns and was wearing body armor. There were no injuries in
that arrest and the suspect was booked for second degree murder. The family of the victim attended the
court arraignment.
Chief Bennett continued, this investigation was an example of community involvement, investigative work,
and collaboration among law enforcement agencies and will continue. She offered a thank you to council
for their willingness to assist the police department with improvements over the past three years. She
described the resources utilized during this investigation which helped bring a prompt closure and arrest of
the suspect. The department utilized two K-9 units in tracking the suspect initially back to the apartments,
a big piece of the initial investigation. Due to medical kits provided in all patrol vehicles, officers were able
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 2
Packet Pg. 32
8.2.a
to provide advanced lifesaving efforts to the victim and allowed fire and EMS to transport the victim within
four minutes when the goal is ten. The medical kits have been used multiple times to save lives in the City.
The drone unit was deployed to assist with mapping of the crime scene with photogrammetry Pix4D, crime
mapping software attached to the drone. The police department also has a FARO scanner which was used
to capture crime scene data from the ground level in a fraction of the time of previous technology.
Chief Bennett continued, the crime analyst put in many long hours to provide critical investigative support,
taking workload off the detectives so they could focus on the main investigation including tracking down
tips and video evidence. The body worn cameras, which were mandated by the legislature, allowed the
department to review body worn camera footage of previous contacts with the suspect to obtain a
description. The Axon interview room technology, part of last year's remodel, was utilized to capture the
audio and video interrogation in compliance with state law. The Fleet system allowed constant surveillance
and recording of the suspect during all transports In Edmonds Police Department vehicles. Without some
of that equipment, she was unsure the arrest would have occurred as quickly. She wanted the council to
know what their investments in the police department have done to assist with solving this crime.
Councilmember Paine thanked Chief Bennett for the update and expressed appreciation for the description
of how the new resources installed under her leadership assisted with this investigation. She asked if there
would be a point when the City should consider installing gunfire receptors on poles to track when gunfire
occurs in the community. Chief Bennett answered that technology is available and comes with a price tag.
If that is a direction council wants the department to pursue, it can be researched. Councilmember Paine
acknowledged there would need to be further discussion. She asked if there would be any value in that
technology and whether Edmonds need it now. Chief Bennett answered it is hard to quantify at what point
that would be important to have. Statistically the City has higher crime rates along Highway 99, but she
was uncertain that technology would add value because many calls are received from neighbors and
anonymous reporting of gunshots which can be a muffler or an M-80. The department responds to those
calls; the gunfire receptors are an additional tool. Councilmember Paine thanked everyone involved in
investigating this crime, noting it was a difficult thing to go through.
Councilmember Tibbott added his thanks to the police department and for the report. The report highlights
the fact that the department works together at all levels. He asked Chief Bennett to extend the council's
appreciation to the entire department for the work they did. When she described the six days, he had not
realized it had been that short of a period of time, truly unprecedented and remarkable. The residents of
Edmonds appreciate that a dangerous person had been taken off the streets. He added his admiration for the
police department, facing danger the way they have, the fact that the suspect was armed with two guns and
wearing body armor illustrates extreme danger exist in the community that law enforcement is ready to
face. Chief Bennett assured she will pass on the council's appreciation.
Councilmember Nand pointed out council also approved the creation of a commander class. She
complimented the Edmonds Police Department, particularly Commander McClure, on its culturally
appropriate community outreach during the course of the investigation into this terrible tragedy. She is from
an immigrant community and understands when something like this happens, special cultural sensitivities
have to be adhered to which Commander McClure and Chief Bennett did, due in part to the extra training
and resources provided by the commander position. Chief Bennett agreed the commanders have been an
invaluable resource and she thanked Councilmember Nand for highlighting that. Chief Bennett thanked
Councilmember Nand for helping set up last night's meeting with the family and the rideshare community
lead.
Councilmember Eck also thanked the police department, noting there had been great concern in the
Westgate and Madrona communities and throughout the City. She relayed the community's gratitude for
the police department's fast action. Moving forward, she was curious if there were other things that would
have been helpful in the investigation. Chief Bennett commented the things she enumerated were very
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 3
Packet Pg. 33
8.2.a
valuable in reaching a quick solution and arrest. She thanked the council for providing the police department
the equipment needed to solve this case.
Councilmember Chen added his appreciation for the outstanding work the police department did that led to
the arrest of a suspect and bring the case to closure under Chief Benett's leadership. Although unfortunate
and a tragedy, this crime sends a message to those with an evil mind and intention that the Edmonds Police
Department is capable and illustrates to the Highway 99 high crime area that the police are here to protect
residents and visitors.
5. BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT
Community, Culture & Economic Development Director Todd Tatum explained the BID usually provides
their annual report during the budget timeframe, however, due to scheduling conflicts and budget
deliberations, it was delayed to January this year. The BID's budget has already been approved; this is an
opportunity to talk about the work the BID has done during the past year and the work to be done in the
future.
Jen Lawson, BID President, reviewed the history of Ed!:
• Why Ed!?
o A stable and predictable self -funding mechanism to support downtown -only marketing and
programs
o To create something bigger and better than any one of our businesses could accomplish on our
own
o Bring a new level of professionalism in our look and feel for promoting downtown • Focus on
our downtown core
Approved categories in BID ordinance
o Marketing & Hospitality
o Safety & Cleanliness
o Appearance & Environment
o Transportation
o Business Recruitment & Retention
o Organization
Ed!'s Mission Statement
o Ed! is a focused, funded organization that supports and improves business conditions in
Edmonds. Our goal is to ensure our downtown stays lively, attractive, prosperous and
welcoming to everyone.
2023-2024 Member Advisory Board
o Jen Lawson, President (Crow)
o Olivia Brown -Latham, Secretary (Sugarology Edmonds)
o Jason Arnhill, Treasurer (Peoples Bank)
o Ricky Bobadilla (Santa Fe Mexican Grill & Cantina)
o Robert Boehlke (House Wares)
o Cheryl Farrish (Certa Farrish Law Group)
o Lisa Epstein (Salish Insurance Group)
o Venus Forteza (Maize & Barley)
o Kimberly Koenig (Rogue)
o Beth Sanger (Ombu Salon + Spa)
o Carrie Hulbert (Program Manager)
Professional expertise
o Volunteer advisory board of member business representatives have a wide range of expertise,
offering their fresh ideas for free
o Paid experts with extensive professional experience are utilized strategically
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 4
Packet Pg. 34
8.2.a
o This combination of skills results in highly professional, targeted and nimble executions with
a small budget
Downtown organizations work together
o Ed! Edmonds Downtown Alliance
■ A Business Improvement District; fees are used to market, create environmental graphics,
promote and improve downtown Edmonds
o Downtown Edmonds Merchants MeetUp
■ (formerly DEMA) has become a sub -committee of Ed! and will continue to serve as an
information -sharing group for members
o City of Edmonds - Explore Edmonds
■ City government, supports greater Edmonds.
■ Promotes Edmonds as a premier destination at their Explore Edmonds website and
@exploreedmondswa
o Edmonds Chamber of Commerce
■ Provides networking and educational opportunities to members, puts on city events.
Carrie Hulbert, BID Program Manager, reviewed
• Appearance and environment programs
o Courtesy Umbrellas
o After Hours Parking Signs
■ 3locations:
- Sound Credit Union
- WA Federal
- US Bank
■ Adds 50 spots downtown
■ Working on adding additional lots
o "Discover Downtown" Directional Flags
o Temporary Lovin' Summer Mural
Communication and outreach programs
o Member outreach
■ Keep members up to date via Annual Meeting, Year in Review brochure, email newsletter,
web page and new member information & visits
o My Edmonds News Sponsored Content
■ Articles run as sponsored content six times per year for additional reach
Marketing programs
o Marketing Strategy
■ Promote Edmonds as a local and day trip destination
■ Hyper -local focus (Edmonds +10 miles)
■ Design & manage campaigns promoting Edmonds, utilizing digital content, ads, and social
to drive visits and keep Edmonds top of mind
■ A local writer and photographer work with the Program Manager to produce high -quality
content
o EdmondsDowntown.org
■ Member business directory
■ Feature articles
■ Business spotlights
■ Parking map
■ Edmonds info
o Site directory
■ Provide an additional digital presence for businesses
■ Category & business pages viewed over 70,000 times
o Web Feature Articles
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 5
Packet Pg. 35
8.2.a
■ Since 2018 Ed! has used compelling stories to promote downtown
■ Highlight Edmonds businesses, campaigns, events and the unique qualities of downtown
■ Viewed 23,000 times in last year
o Business Spotlights
o Digital Advertising
■ Promote Spotlights, Features, campaigns and services
■ Ads were seen 1.6M times in 2023
■ Strong average link clickthrough rate of 1.3%
o Social media
■ Instagram: 7,578 followers
- 25% follower growth
■ Facebook: 3,351 followers
- 11 % follower growth
o Edmonds Holidays Campaign
■ Holiday Trolley + Emily the Elf
■ Festive Drink Bingo
■ First Dibs
■ Window Clings
■ Edmonds Holidays website
■ Posters & table tents
■ Social Media ads & features
o Lovin' Summer Edmonds Campaign
■ Window clings
■ "Discover Downtown" flags
■ Posters & table tents
■ Family Scavenger Hunt
■ Ads and website features
o Love Lists Campaign
■ Videos on social media
■ Ads and website feature
■ Window clings
■ Water bottle stickers
o Green Edmonds Campaign
■ Highlight businesses limiting their environmental impact
■ Posted pledge videos
■ Gave out packets with stickers and wildflower seeds on Earth Day
■ Green Edmonds clings
Ms. Lawson reviewed the work plan and budget:
• 2024 Approved Budget
Administration
$22,200
Marketing
$47,145
Communication and Outreach
$5,400
Appearance & Environment
(includes Budget Supplement from Fund Balance for Directional
Si na e/Ma
$28,800
TOTAL BUDGETED EXPENDITURES
$103,545
TOTAL BUDGETED REVENUES incl $32,886 fund balance
$112,095
• 2013-2023 budget summary
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 6
Packet Pg. 36
8.2.a
2a,3 a15�p ,a,6
Buaee[e0 Mluai dM4evea Mt�Y BUOQoea 2MUui BuapeteU N116MauN BUYIneU }0114nuY
BWDnea
2a1B
.�W,
v10
h� >o2,
Bidi� 2019 M,N BWpn 1020 Mama 1011 hvpmeU 1021 M3uY BrUOUaed
Mfuai
YN haOUaea �
s'1D
p mnfi rce a sales 56,1a N.31) N311 65.E01 66,R3 66,543
SO.l3>
/1506 /LN,
26
N4 9-
1A. 115a6
101a1
19,192
13,151
29,132 II.SIB
39,1N
dO Msessmem ree fiyaap s],t16 e9Paa N'IDI 91.BB0 ]SA]/ etA4l J4600 alA®
Ja,La
16F63 az,0u
90A6J
]lAJ9
19� ]/.ales
J9,m9
]6FBfi
J9]®
9q]N 19.2m
]6,326
I.UceOenews I 0 D D D a 652 U
1M
0 690
0
0
0 12/
0
61
0 D
pD Umar.mc _ 0 0 0 D 0
lDaa
a 48fiU
0
1,DK
a -1
0
D
Ltm 0
L-
TmalMenue K,000 5].9a3 1/5.131 130.435 M., I]E,MI .1.1 I431966 1a6A13
]a.375
-A. 131.D63
II6,611
110.1i/
88bR B1,M3
89,556
96A00
10},3fi0
12- 101.12J
11-
FaOmae
Mmlreshatbn S,OW 0 1Upm S,W6 1Laa0 10,ebi 1- IJAN 16Fm
imimcel lmmsay 0 0 fa
-11
26,]m MABD
25,20C
20.JN
2/A2s 25.101
2-
26AJ3
2-
2- E1.950
.1.
3(N D D D a 0
raarhemOldease seenarEeiowl 2D J0.fisD 21.- 2Ln1 3laDo 31A95 36.0aD
a
3L3Ji
0 0
542Uo /]A]9
G
NAas
D
51,Ip]
0 D
3]Fr5 2a,s69
D
a2,sas
0
a,Na
a
11,145
a
NA01 /7.1/6
3tJ
MemBer [rgerRm BPneacF S,paD 1.Y9 1.- 1,9Y S,ODD 149 I1- 101311 11.000
151331
A- 13,183
fi,iID
1-
L9ID L031
3,1ID
1A,
SAID
3.900 /,BBO
L.,
haaez0mal fiumeas Beswuces /ADO 0 12AaD D 10.000 1.D11 S.aW a,800 6,1g0
5.X6
IA00 sR
C
0
0 0
0
D
0
0 0
0
SmriGalls haaram 0 0 0 50.000 /,000 I0.000 lAaa ID.000
3A31
5,000 3]22
SAOC
2.590
IFOa 1.500
D
0
a
D 0
0
4pUmrmcel Fm mnmem 0 0 SArfl 10./11 2a,Da0 17111 Mam 19,I33 M-
w66e M:3mem remm9mwm D D a D D
1-
1L1a111 15.11}
14/DD
15.IN
11b50 10,639
I'-
2M
1S,-
i1,18/ 15.i0D
11".
aam0
]eui [.Umxs /ga0o t.glfi espm 9- e/,DaD s5,tl0 t1LDm 9a318 tu5m
92Fu
DD
uq]ID tD6,9fi/
-2.
-1F
tgFla
6e,ln
D
na/o
D
Kb69
a
eL6lo
et�K �.2>s
64208
4lnm 26Aa0 56,13a Gala .'.1
NZa] 6l713 aW /401 3%-
/2,055
WI 2/A96
1,336
115/6
41fi5 19,151
I3.E16
29.112
1/,fiBO
39.]Ba IIASI
50,902
• Advisory Board Meetings
0 2nd Thursday each month at 8 am
o Zoom and in person at City Hall
Council President Olson thanked the presenters for the work they put into the BID year round, it is definitely
an ongoing endeavor and she has seen them in action at their meetings. For the public, she clarified the BID
structure is something that any business district can create with the help of the City. The businesses within
the BID contribute and the money is spent where it impacts those businesses the most. When people say
more money is spent in downtown Edmonds, that is true, but it is money BID members contribute and
decide how to spend, not tax dollars. There are BIDS in other cities that focus on security, graffiti removal,
or whatever needs or issues are most vital to that business district. She wanted to ensure people understand
what a BID is, it is a tool available to any business district. For anyone interested in forming a BID, she
suggested contacting Mr. Tatum for further information or a councilmember who could put them in contact
with Mr. Tatum. Ms. Lawson commented the items funded by the BID are fluid, for example, a new need
is identified that is important to board members and the BID at large. The BID does not necessarily have
the same program every year, it can be changed as needed.
Councilmember Nand commented she always enjoys the BID's presentation, especially as a downtown
business owner who was once a member of the BID who is now outside the BID, she found it a magical
experience. She relayed her support for everything the BID does to support brick and mortar businesses at
a time when they are under incredible pressure from globalization, major competition from multinational
corporations and online spending as well as inflation. She thanked the BID and Mr. Tatum and his staff for
everything they do. She asked whether within the structure of Green Edmonds there was potential for
synergy with the Mayor's Climate Protection committee or the tree board who are doing things like tree
give aways or Taming Bigfoot to help businesses reduce their carbon footprint. Ms. Lawson answered she
would love to work further with the City; last year's Green Edmonds pledge came from the City. Ms.
Hulbert recalled the BID worked with Kelsey Foster to coordinate and amplify each other's efforts, and
agreed more could be done. Councilmember Nand offered to help make that connections with staff liaisons.
Councilmember Chen referred to the BID's very limited budget and the amount of work they do, finding
the amount of effort and energy amazing, recognizing there were also a lot of volunteer efforts. He noted
the budget primarily shows expenditures and inquired about revenues and whether there were members
whose dues were in arrears. Ms. Lawson explained each business is assessed based on whether they are an
open door or closed door (appointment) business. As a retail business, she is open door, so she pays more
for her square footage than a business like a law firm because she may benefit more from the marketing
programs, ability to promote a sale, etc.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 7
Packet Pg. 37
8.2.a
Councilmember Chen asked if all the businesses within the BID are happy to be members and pay their
membership dues. Ms. Lawson answered there is delinquency list, people who do not find value in the BID
and haven't paid their dues. The best way to handle that has been an ongoing issue with the City and she
was unsure an agreement had been reached regarding how to handle it, acknowledging it was a tricky issue.
There are businesses that do not find benefit in the BID, but the majority do. Ms. Hulbert said the
delinquency list increased during Covid, but has decreased a lot in past year. She offered to provide the
latest delinquency report.
Councilmember Chen expressed amazement with the amount of work being done to keep downtown alive.
Mr. Tatum explained following last year's discussion about delinquency, it was agreed to expand
communication with members. That has been a focus of the BID over the last year and has had a direct
reflection in the lower number of delinquencies. The administration's policy has been to send delinquent
members to collections and that remains the most appropriate action. Ms. Lawson commented people want
to have a business in downtown Edmonds because it is lively, vibrant, energetic and full of people every
day of the week. The assessment is a small amount, a few hundred dollars a year, not a lot compared to
what businesses get back. People can choose to locate their business in a strip mall where they are an island
and do their own thing, but in the BID, businesses are part of something special and in her opinion the
benefits outweigh the assessment.
Councilmember Dotsch said she always likes seeing the umbrellas. As QR codes are becoming more
popular than URL, she asked if the BID had considered putting QR codes on the umbrellas versus the long
URL. With regard to parking, she asked if the parking lot below US Bank to the west behind Beresford
Booth was part of the afterhours parking program, noting there was a sign for afterhours parking. Ms.
Lawson advised that is part of the afterhours parking. Councilmember Dotsch commented people often
drive around looking for parking and suggested since there is no signage directing people to the parking
lots that businesses promote the parking via a handout or map identifying the afterhours lots. Ms. Lawson
agreed that would be great for restaurants and bars; retail is usually closed by the time the afterhours parking
is available. She was interested in encouraging employees not to park in front of businesses. The City offers
a $50/year parking permit that allows parking just blocks from stores/businesses. She was interesting in
finding ways to promote that so employees don't utilize the spaces in front of businesses.
Councilmember Dotsch commented the parking study she did a few years ago found 50% of vehicles within
a 3 block radius of the core had employee parking permits. She wondered how employee parking worked
and whether they played the game of moving their cars around. She recognized it was difficult for
downtown businesses to find employees. Ms. Lawson suggested increased messaging to inform business
owners of the permit. For example, Pam buys each of her employees a permit, a huge expense that she
carries to make sure spaces are available for her customers. There has been more parking enforcement lately
which prevents people from parking all day in the core.
Councilmember Dotsch commented there were areas where all -day parking was allowed with a permit but
she was unsure if vehicles without a permit would be ticketed for parking all day. In her experience,
enforcement has been loose for quite some time. Mr. Tatum commented there was a lack of enforcement
personnel for a couple years. As enforcement personnel were added, there was a period of issuing warnings
and now enforcement was getting more strict. Councilmember Dotsch wondered if there was enough
signage and whether there were enough spaces in relation to the number of permits. Mr. Tatum offered to
touch bases with the police chief on parking enforcement. Ms. Lawson said when a permit is issued, it
includes a map of where you can park with a permit.
6. PLANNING BOARD UPDATE
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 8
Packet Pg. 38
8.2.a
Planning & Development Director Susan McLaughlin thanked the planning board for their volunteer
contribution. They meet every other Wednesday which is no small feat, especially in 2024 when there will
be lot of larger initiatives including the comprehensive plan on work plan.
Planning Board Chair Jeremy Mitchell welcomed Councilmembers Eck and Dotsch and said he looked
forward to working with council. He reviewed:
• Planning Board Powers and Duties
o As outlined and codified in Title 10, ECC Chapter 10.40 and consistent with RCW Chapter
35.63, the Planning Board shall serve in an advisory capacity to the mayor and the city council
in the following matters
■ All amendments and elements of the comprehensive plan
■ All amendments or modifications to parking
■ Acquisition and development of all City parks and recreation facilities
■ Subcommittee work on special projects
• 2023 Highlights
o Staff / Admin Reports:
■ Election of Officers
■ Quarterly Parks Reports
■ Annual Summary Update to Council
o Joint Meetings:
■ (June 14th) Planning Board / City Council: Review of Recent Housing Legislation
■ (June 28th) Planning Board / Tree Board: Working Session on Tree Code (Development
& Private Property)
■ (November 8th) Planning Board / Economic Development Commission (EDC) / Comp
Plan Consultant VIA: Comp Plan Existing Conditions, Growth Targets, Zoning Capacity
o Code / Land Use / Policy Updates & Development:
■ Planning Board Handbook Update (3 meetings)
- Recommendation to Council
■ Step -back Standards in CG Zones Adjacent to Single -Family (RS) Zones (3 meetings)
- Recommendation to Council
■ Tree Code Updates: Private Property (8 meetings)
- In Development
■ Parks Athletic Field Use & Reservation Policy (1 meeting)
- Recommendation to Council
■ Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) Code Amendment (7 meetings)
- Recommendation to Council
■ HWY 99 Community Renewal Plan (1 meeting)
- In Development
■ Draft CIP/CFP
- Recommendation to Council
■ Site -specific Rezone (Edmonds Way)
- Recommendation to Council
■ Detached Accessory Dwelling Units (DADU)
- In Development
o Public Hearings:
■ Minor Code Amendments
■ Architectural Design Board (ADB) Review & Step Back Requirements in CG-Zones
■ Primary Use Code Amendment, Daycares in Neighborhood Business (BN) Zones
■ (2, spanning 4 PB Meetings) Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) Code Amendment
■ Draft Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) & Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
o Subcommittee Work:
■ Step -back Standards in CG Zones Adjacent to Single -Family (RS) Zones
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 9
Packet Pg. 39
8.2.a
■ Draft CIP/CFP Plan
■ Draft Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement Modifications
■ Tree Code for Private Property (currently being vetted)
o Parkland Acquisitions:
■ Hurst Property Potential Acquisition Overview
■ Landmark 99 (Burlington Coat Factory) Overview / Masterplan Options
■ Mee Property Park Acquisition Purchase Agreement
o Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update:
■ GMA / Comp Plan Basics Overview (1 meeting)
■ Draft Vision Statement (4 meetings)
- Optional
■ Climate Action Plan (1 meeting)
- Mandatory Element as of 2023
■ Comp Plan Outline of Consultant Work / Public Engagement Overview (1 meeting)
■ Comp Plan Update Briefings, Consultant Scoping, Subarea Plans Overview (2 meetings)
2024 Projected Workload
We have a busy workload this year which will include but not limited to the following:
f 1. Comprehensive Plan Development and Finalization
Mandatory Elements Optional Elements
F 1. Land Use 1. Subarea Plans
s 2. Housing
3. Transportation 2. Economic Development
d 4. Capital Facilities 3. Parks, Recreation & Open Space
= 5. Utilities
l7
= 6. Shoreline Policies
7. Climate Change &
Resiliency
2. Development Code
1. Multifamily Design Standards
J 2. ADU / DADUs
LU
3. General Code Modernization
J
3. Tree Code Development and Finalization (TBD)
a 1. Private Property
Z 2. Development
4. 2024 Capital Improvement Plan / Capital Facilities Plan (CIP/CFP)
Q S. HWY 99 Community Renewal Plan
Z 6. Landmark 99
7. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) Finalization
S. Climate Action Plan (CAP) implementation Policies (Green Incentives, etc)
9. Waterfront?
10. Others?
• 2024 Comp Plan Status Update
The Comprehensive Plan is moving into high gear in these beginning months of 2024.
Staff has provided the following update to the Planning Board:
Staff and consultants are working on several components in parallel:
1. VIA (City's consultant) is working on:
✓ Developing Existing Conditions Memo
a) Summarize findings from background documents, relevant
data, and feedback from community meetings held over the
past several months.
✓ Working Through Growth Scenario Methodologies
a) They are complex given the limited variables at the City's
disposal for housing bills 1337 and 1110.
b) From the results, the city will have options on how to
distribute the growth targets allocated by the State.
c) Once growth distribution targets are established (come
Marchthey will serve as the foundation for key changes in
the Comp Plan.
2. Next Phase of Community Engagement:
✓ Working with the Consultant to Setup Stakeholder Interviews
✓ Developing the First Online Open House
a) Expected to go online in early February
✓ Community Champions Outreach Has Begun
a) Will begin the selection process and first meetings in the
next month
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 10
Packet Pg. 40
8.2.a
• 2024 Goals & Expectations
Goals and expectations for the Planning Board to effectively do our job areas follows:
1. Deliver Sound Recommendations to the Mayor and Council
ut
a 2. Effective Prioritization of Workload Items
U3. Cohesive Collaboration with Council, Mayor, Staff, Boards & Commissions, and
the Community on the Comprehensive Plan and other City Planning Elements or
Issues
1. Adequate & Complete Information
Q
2. Adequate Time for Community Participation & Input
Vr 3. Adequate Time to Vet and Deliberate the Information
Z
W(Ideally More Than One Touch)
U 4. Regular Status Updates on Key Planning Components
Q
cc
0
LL
(A
Z
O
a
Lu
W
M.
x
W
• 2024 Council Feedback
o Given our projected workload and the expectations the planning board needs to make sound
recommendations to the mayor and council, what would council like the planning board to
prioritize?
Council President Olson thanked Chair Mitchell for the presentation, the clarity and what the planning
board needs from staff and council. She looked forward to working collaboratively as a City to get
everything done this year. She agreed it was a daunting list and appreciated his acknowledgement that not
everything can be done and done well. She thanked the planning board for asking council and the
administration for their priorities. She reminded council direction to the planning board has to be as a body
and encouraged councilmembers to affirm or agree with things stated by another councilmember. She will
try to synthesize the council's comments and have the council's administrative assistant send a list to
councilmembers for confirmation. Council's inputs today will ultimately be reflected in resolution, on a
future agenda for council approval, to ensure the panning board gets clear input from the council.
Councilmember Nand thanked Chair Mitchell for his excellent presentation. She refreshed the suggestion
she made last year that the tree board undertake some of the responsibilities for parks, recreation and open
space, to reduce the planning board's very heavy workload and especially since the tree board's staff liaison
is now Parks, Recreation and Human Services Director Angie Feser. Chair Mitchell expressed interest in
that suggestion.
Councilmember Nand suggested similarly, subarea plans and economic development could be the
responsibility of the economic development commission. With those suggestions, the planning board can
focus on the mandatory elements. She thanked the planning board for their hard work and volunteerism.
Councilmember Paine observed the PROS Plan was recently developed and would not need to be redone.
She recalled funding was added for the economic development optional element due to its importance. She
asked if the economic development element would be reviewed by the planning board. Ms. McLaughlin
answered the comprehensive plan has mandatory and optional elements. Some elements have recently been
updated and do not need additional work such as the PROS Plan. The transportation, economic
development, capital facilities, and utilities elements as well as the land use and housing elements will be
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 11
Packet Pg. 41
8.2.a
significantly revised in this update. That being said, she emphasized the City has a comprehensive plan and
is not starting from scratch. The bulk of the work is looking at anticipated growth and meeting growth
targets. A lot of the policies are still relevant and will be carried forward into the 2024 update. She did not
want to over or underestimate the work that will be necessary; the City has a firm foundation with a lot of
great policies that can be carried over.
Councilmember Paine said her two main requests are related to the transportation element and the climate
change & resiliency elements. With regard to the transportation element, she wanted to add multimodality
throughout all aspects and connect it with housing and access to the subareas and commercial districts and
creating communities that welcome walking and biking. That will also encompass a lot of the climate action
plan goals and ensure there is climate resilience within the community through the goals in the climate
action plan and multimodality which will help with clean air, multi -modalities and incorporating that into
housing where appropriate such as Five Corners, Firdale, Perrinville, etc. The comprehensive plan update
is a chance to put that all together. She expressed appreciation for all the volunteer hours the planning board
puts toward their twice a month meetings, an intense four hours/month. She has watched the planning
board's meetings; they have an extensive extended agenda and devote a great deal of time.
Councilmember Eck commented having had some exposure to planning commissions, she agreed this was
a lot. She was used to the county meeting once a month. She gave kudos to the planning board members
for the significant time and expertise they invest. She asked if the planning board was looking at efficiencies
so the same topics do not continually come back. Chair Mitchell answered yes, the planning board wants
to ensure in addition to other planning activities that happen in unison with the comprehensive plan that
they can still get to the comprehensive plan, hold public hearings, provide vetted input on the elements in
timely manner and provide the city council a good recommendation at the conclusion of the process. The
efficiency of meetings and workload priorities are key. Some meetings may have three topics, another may
only have 1-2; there also needs to be flex room for one-off land use changes that come up 1-2 times/year.
Councilmember Eck said her comments were not intended to be a criticism; she admired the work that has
been done and wanted it to be more satisfying for the planning board.
Councilmember Eck asked if there were things the planning board did not think they should be involved
with reviewing. Chair Mitchell answered the planning board would love to look at all the planning elements
because that is their role, but a lot of the legal aspects are not within the planning board's purview so things
that require attorney input or review could be eliminated. The planning board has done a good job requesting
input from the city attorney. Some of the code amendments on minor things such as conditional uses require
multiple touches and public hearings. He suggested giving consideration to eliminating the requirement for
a public hearing for uses that aren't significant, and only require staff review. Councilmember Eck thanked
him for those ideas. She offered her priorities: land use, housing development codes, climate and the
shoreline.
Council President Olson echoed the priorities of land use and housing and suggested also emphasizing
parking especially when amenities are not distributed perfectly, parking is a bigger issue to allow people to
use amenities where they exist. She was also interested in areas having knowledgeable citizen groups such
as economic development and transportation work with staff on that element so the element would come to
the planning board pretty well vetted. That would allow the planning board to deemphasize review of an
element even though it is important. Her other priorities include subarea plans, finalizing the CARA code
due to its environmental impact, and multifamily design standards, and implementation of the climate action
plan green incentives.
Councilmember Dotsch said she has watched and attended a lot of planning board meetings; they do great
work and are a very diverse group. She referred to the GMA and comprehensive plan that require continuous
public participation. She was concerned this late in the process people have no idea what is going on. With
minimal people attending meetings, she doubted many knew about the DADU code update. One of the
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 12
Packet Pg. 42
8.2.a
priorities she did not see listed was public engagement and she wanted to ensure the planning board
considering public input in their recommendation to council. She emphasized the need to ensure public
hearings are well advertised so the public knows what's happening and that they have an opportunity to
provide input. Decisions regarding land use are some of the most impactful decisions the City makes and
she wants the comprehensive plan to be Edmonds -specific. Edmonds has many diverse areas so land use
will be a big topic because different areas necessitate different discussions. The development code and land
use impact the stormwater code update. She recognized the challenge of a silo effect, considering one thing
at a time and wanted to ensure things are woven together due to the impacts they have on each other.
Councilmember Dotsch continued, referring to the planning board's extended agenda which does not have
much on it even though it is halfway through January. She recognized it is a big lift for the planning board
with two meetings per month. With regard to not touching things twice, she questioned how the DADU
code update jumped the line. More information is coming from the state and the Department of Commerce
website includes Q&A regarding units per lot, how HB 1337 melds with HB 1110, and two units per lot
versus four. It seems a lot of work is being done on the DADU code when more guidance will be provided
by the state and the City has until mid-2025 to comply with HB 1337. There is a lot of information in the
DADU code including heights, views, slopes, setbacks, etc., and the more global comprehensive plan
update should be more of a priority.
Councilmember Dotsch asked about the unified development code, whether that was coming forward as
well. Ms. McLauglin commented some of Councilmember Dotsch's questions about the planning board are
related to the planning & development department's workplan which she can schedule on a future agenda.
With regard to the unified development code, there is no budget for that in 2024 which is serendipitous
given the amount of work on the planning board's plate. The code modernization work, proposed in 2023,
continues as described last year; minor code amendments are presented quarterly and major code
amendments continue as mandated by regulatory agencies or as they arise via plans such as the climate
action plan. That is not to say code work is not being done, that is still part of the code modernization work.
The unified development code is a wholesale content evaluation of the code which would make much more
sense to do in 2025 after the comprehensive plan policies are adopted at the end of 2024 and follow that
with codification of the policies. Councilmember Dotsch agreed multifamily design standards should be a
priority. She reiterated updating the code related to DADUs can wait.
Councilmember Nand referred to shoreline policies in the list of mandatory elements of the comprehensive
plan, and asked if that included Lake Ballinger or only the waterfront. Ms. McLaughlin answered portions
of Lake Ballinger are within the City's jurisdiction so she would assume they are considered shoreline, but
she offered to follow up with Councilmember Nand on that.
Councilmember Nand referred to mandatory comprehensive plan element 7, climate change and resiliency,
and asked if that would consider shade equity and public safety related to heat domes and exposed concrete.
Ms. McLaughlin answered that was part of the climate action plan and gaps in the tree canopy. Equity is
also part of the gap analysis as part of broader comprehensive plan. Councilmember Nand recommended,
if the planning board were to engage in a public process related to the City's response to extreme weather
events under the climate change & resiliency mandatory element, that would be helpful for the council.
Councilmember Chen advised his priorities for this year are land use, housing, multifamily design standards
and the DADU code, especially housing. Given HB 1337 and HB 1110, the City has to make plans for
housing options. With regard to housing, he recalled a lot of work was done by the housing commission in
2021 that supports HB 1110 and 1337. He suggested referencing that work instead of reinventing the wheel.
Ms. McLaughlin agreed, relaying that was part of the existing conditions memo; taking all the work that
has been done and ensuring it informs the comprehensive plan and does not duplicate work or analysis done
previously.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 13
Packet Pg. 43
8.2.a
Councilmember Chen commented on the increased need for ADUs and DADUs in the community due to
the aging population and increased costs including property taxes. The Edmonds School District is also
looking at big levies and property tax increases so DADUs and ADUs will be more and more important
and need to be a priority.
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Matt Richardson read the first whereas clause in Ordinance 3909 that created the BID, "Whereas the
owners and operators of a business located in the area representing approximately 60% or more of
businesses levied by the ordinance signed a petition in support of establishing an Edmonds Downtown
Business Improvement District." He said it was not true that 60% of the businesses signed a petition. The
video of that 2013 council meeting is available on the City's website. He has a business in Edmonds and
has had businesses and corporations in other states and has never been on a delinquency list, but is one of
the businesses who hasn't paid their BID membership dues of approximately $300 for almost a year. He
did not believe the ordinance was created legally; the RCW requires a petition but in the case of the
Edmonds' BID, it failed to pass. A hearing was held straddling the holidays and 10 days' mailed notice per
the RCW was not provided. During the hearing, business owners testified regarding their belief the petition
failed and the BID was no longer under consideration. Two motions were made to table and hold another
public hearing which were denied. He referred to businesses in the BID who are not paying their dues,
including lawyers. Unlike other BIDS in the state, the Edmonds BID has never gaveled a meeting. The
Pioneer Square BID meets twice a year, gavels their meetings, adopts bylaws and operates democratically.
If the Edmonds BID wants participation and wants businesses to pay their dues, it should be operated
democratically. Things the BID does like parking cost money. He knew of a kid in Edmonds who was
paying for his college tuition by money put into a box for parking. He distributed a white paper to council.
He recommended watching the council meeting, asserting it was not ratified.
Mayor Rosen declared a brief recess.
7. RECEIVED FOR FILING
1. OCTOBER 2023 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
2. NOVEMBER 2023 MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
3. APPOINTMENT OF COUNCILMEMBERS TO COMMITTEES, BOARDS AND
COMMISSIONS FOR 2024
4. CITY OF EDMONDS FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT UPDATE BY
MCKINSTRY
5. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FOR FILING
6. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS
8. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TIBBOTT, TO
APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items
approved are as follows:
1. APPROVAL OF REGULAR MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 2, 2024
2. APPROVAL OF COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 9, 2024
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS AND WIRE PAYMENTS
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 14
Packet Pg. 44
4. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL AND BENEFIT CHECKS, DIRECT DEPOSIT AND WIRE
PAYMENTS
5. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO NEIL TIBBOTT FOR SERVICE AS COUNCIL
PRESIDENT
6. NALOXONE AGREEMENT
7. PROPOSED LISTING OF 820 MAIN STREET ON THE EDMONDS' REGISTER OF
HISTORIC PLACES
8. PROPOSED LISTING OF 820 MAPLE STREET ON THE EDMONDS' REGISTER OF
HISTORIC PLACES
9. PROPOSED LISTING OF 116 - 4TH AVE N ON THE EDMONDS' REGISTER OF
HISTORIC PLACES
10. PROPOSED LISTING OF 100 - 5TH AVE N ON THE EDMONDS' REGISTER OF
HISTORIC PLACES
11. FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER BUILDING USE AGREEMENTS
12. EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT - EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO CITY COUNCIL
13. APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN SERVICES
FOR PHASE 15 WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
14. PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING SOLAR PROJECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT AND POWER OF ATTORNEY
15. APPROVAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL LAG AGREEMENT WITH KPG PSOMAS, INC. FOR
THE MAIN ST OVERLAY PROJECT
16. FIRE STATION 16 FIRE ALARM PANEL AND SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
9. COUNCIL BUSINESS
1. UPDATE ON THE INITIAL PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS AND GOALS FOR THE
STORM AND SURFACE WATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Stormwater Engineer Jerry Shuster advised this is an update on progress on the storm and surface water
comprehensive plan. He introduced Rebecca Dugopolski, Herrera Environmental Consultants.
Ms. Dugopolski reviewed:
• What is the SCP?
Water
Sanitary Sewer
BEortw dt
iolid Waste
itl Faiwaa C°nnu Homing fransportatiwr
Other lhilities
o Sets direction for managing storm & surface waters in the City
o Operations & Maintenance plan
o Asset Management plan
o Regulatory compliance
o Capital improvements
o Financial plan
o Equity plan
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 15
Packet Pg. 45
8.2.a
• What projects and programs will the SCP include?
Keep streets and private
property dry to the
maximum extent possible
(Public health and safety&
economic vitality).
Operate, maintain, and
upgrade stormwater
infrastructure in a
cost-efficient manner.
Comply with Ecology's
Municipal Stormwater
Permit and all other
applicable environmental
regulations.
Improve existing
infrastructure to reduce
the impact of City
stormwater flows on
aquatic environments
(On the Land).
Reconnect floodplains,
re -plant riparian
(streamside) corridor,
remove barrier culverts,
and improve in -stream
:onditions. (In and adjacent
to the stream; City -owned
property only).
5 Stormwater Utility aril Other 1
• Prepare updated Storm and Surface
�,,,� Presentation �j� Water Comprehensive Plan
�.. to Council �f
• Continue opportunities for public input
• Public Workshop
• Public Survey
iiYfiiii/ � ' IIMM Implementation
• Public Workshop
FA Project ALI I . Public Survey
Kick-off • Community Event
• Presentation to Council
Summary of Phase 1 Public Engagement
o October 4 — Project web page and public survey live on City website.
o October 6 — Promote project and ways to get involved (online workshop, public survey, and
in -person event):
■ City Press release
■ Notice provided in local Korean and Spanish -language publications.
■ Facebook post
o October 16 — Email to parties who have shown past interest in storm and surface water issues
including external stakeholders (Tribes, state- regulatory agencies, and adjacent jurisdictions).
o October 17 & 26, November 1 & 14 - Additional Facebook posts regarding project.
o October 18 — Two online workshops — 12-1 pm and 6-7 pm.
o November 4 — City staff at Edmonds Market to promote project, answer questions, and remind
residents to take public survey; Project Flyer distributed (English & Spanish).
o November 17 — Public survey closed.
o November 28 — Public survey results reviewed by Staff.
Project Web Page
o Project background
o Relevant documents
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 16
Packet Pg. 46
8.2.a
o Workshop slides and recording
o Link to public survey (now closed)
Workshop Summary - October 18, 2023
0 11 participants in 2 workshops
o SCP building blocks were the main topic of the presentation
0 10+ questions from participants on the topics that included
■ Stormwater management complexity with nearby municipalities
■ Climate change considerations
■ Impact of the railroad right-of-way on the shoreline
■ Upcoming changes to State Stormwater permit
■ Damage to stream & salmon habitat needs to be addressed
■ Fish passage barriers, roadway contaminants & flooding around Harbor Square
■ Restoration of Edmonds Marsh and connection to Puget Sound
o Stormwater Education Preference Poll
■ Rolled into responses from survey
In -Person Booth at Edmonds Market - Nov. 4, 2023
o Encouraged multiple participants to take public survey.
o Topics of concern/discussion
■ Shell Creek waterfall on private property prohibiting salmon migration upstream
■ Daylighting Willow Creek between Edmonds Marsh and Puget Sound
Public Survey Summary
o Provided an opportunity to:
■ Provide input on proposed SCP actions
■ Add areas for consideration for potential stormwater projects
0 37 Participants - 31 residents, 3 business owners (also residents), and 3 non-residents
(shoppers/visitors)
■ Issues reported:
- 8 flooding issues
- 2 water quality issues
- 1 fish passage barrier
- 1 other (localized flooding)
o What are some topics that you would like to learn more about?
■ How climate change is being incorporated into the SCP.
■ Technical assistance for constructing rain gardens on private property.
■ Natural yard care to reduce harmful chemicals entering our streams.
■ Stewardship opportunities to improve stream health.
■ Removing hard surfaces (driveways/patios) and replacing them with native vegetation.
■ Technical assistance for streamside landowners regarding improving streams and/or runoff
from their property.
■ Assisting with stormwater facility maintenance.
Council President Olson referred to the map of stormwater issues identified by respondents (yellow circles
for flooding) and asked if that include the Lake Ballinger waterfront where residents have experienced
flooding. Mr. Shuster answered that issue was not identified by the 37 participants in the public survey, but
staff is aware of flooding at Lake Ballinger. Council President Olson referred to flooding at Mathay
Ballinger and flooding experienced by residents adjacent to the Landmark property. She offered contact
information for a resident involved with flooding issues in that area. Mr. Shuster said he has not heard of
that issue and asked Council President Olson to forward him the information.
Councilmember Paine referred to a question she submitted earlier today, asking if the stormwater
comprehensive plan and development of associated infrastructure looked at 50 or 100 year major event
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 17
Packet Pg. 47
horizons and how were climate change impacts accommodated in the stormwater comprehensive plan. Mr.
Shuster advised he will address that when he addresses goals later in the presentation.
Councilmember Dotsch referred to the public participation, noting she participated in one of the Zoom
meetings, and asked if staff visited the areas where flooding was reported and actively sought out those
stakeholders. Mr. Shuster said everyone who submitted information via the survey has been contacted about
the flooding or water quality issue they identified and staff is working to resolve those issues.
Councilmember Dotsch referred to the limited number of people who responded to the survey, relaying
unless residents were aware of the survey, they would not respond. Mr. Shuster said people are always
welcome to call the City if they have an issue.
Councilmember Dotsch asked whether episodes of flooding were tracked, noting it would be great to hear
from people who are experiencing stormwater issues. Ms. Dugopolski answered in addition to the survey,
they looked at areas of the City that have known flooding issues as identified by field crews, past reports,
etc. to identify where a capital project could make an improvement. There is a longer list of projects than
just those identified by the survey.
Councilmember Nand asked once the comprehensive plan and storm and surface water work is completed,
how will it impact permitting and how the plan will interact with policies related to construction. Mr.
Shuster answered the City's Phase 2 stormwater permit with the Department of Ecology covers five years
and during that term, the City has to update its stormwater code which affects construction, what people
can/cannot do on their property, and how they manage stormwater. The code was updated in 2022 in
response to the current permit. The current permit expires this year and there will be new requirements in
the new permit. The City will have until 2027 to update the code again to include stricter stormwater rules.
That update can be done earlier if the City chooses.
Councilmember Nand said she is originally from Louisiana where people raise their houses on stilts due to
flooding. She asked if Mr. Shuster foresaw any drastic measures in the future related to construction. Mr.
Shuster commented it was hard to predict the future. Climate change is supposed to produce more intense,
more frequent storms. In terms of flooding, he said Edmonds is in pretty good shape compared to other
cities. There are some problem areas, areas that should not have been built on in the first place such as
located at the bottom of a hill or in a wetland when that was allowed. There will always be problem areas,
but he did not anticipate anything major. Of course, everyone is looking at climate change and sea level
rise which may impact the City.
Mr. Shuster explained these goals are the result of staff and consultant ideas and input from the public
engagement process. Goals 4-7 were most influenced by the public engagement. These draft goals will be
in the utility element of the upcoming comprehensive plan. The first three goals are must -have goals, the
backbone of the storm and surface water comprehensive plan. He reviewed:
• Draft SCP Project Goals
1. Reduce recurring flooding for a safe and healthy community.
2. Replace, protect, and maintain stormwater infrastructure.
3. Comply with all applicable regulatory requirements.
o Several environmental regulations associated with operating a stormwater utility, the
primary is the Department of Ecology's Municipal Stormwater Program
■ City of Edmonds and over 80 other jurisdictions are under Phase 2 permit
■ In exchange for the City performing activities related to development, public education
and outreach, responding to illicit discharges, performing maintenance and planning
for future growth, the State permits the City to discharge stormwater into the waters of
the state which in Edmonds are creeks, wetlands, Lake Ballinger and Puget Sound.
■ A new version of the 5-year permit is scheduled to come out this year and new
regulations are generally more protective of the environment.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 18
Packet Pg. 48
8.2.a
■ This storm and surface water plan will include a roadmap for the City to comply with
all new Ecology requirements.
4. Reduce the impact of stormwater runoff on aquatic habitat through retrofit projects, prioritized
by watershed, that address flow control and water quality improvement.
o This overlaps somewhat with Goal 3 as Ecology is moving to require the City to address
legacy stormwater systems and retrofit them to provide flow control and water quality
treatment. Stormwater systems built before 2010 were not required to control flows into
creeks or treat the runoff. Consequently, about 95% of the stormwater systems in Edmonds,
as in other jurisdictions, do not have flow control or treatment.
o Retrofitting, including the use of Green Streets, is a way to begin to fix this issue.
o High flows, streams scouring and poor water quality affect aquatic organisms. The current
Ecology permit required the City to start planning for retrofits which has been done in parts
of the Perrinville Creek Basin. The next permit will likely require implementing that
project and others.
5. Engage and educate our community on stormwater and surface water issues to promote
environmental stewardship opportunities on public and private properties.
o Required by the permit on several topics. The survey asked the public about topics they
were interested in. Streamside property owners want information on how to do the right
thing for streams and the public is interested in learning more about stewardship
opportunities
6. Devote resources to resolve local storm and surface water issues that require cooperation from
and coordination with other stakeholders.
o A number of storm and surface water issues in the City were identified in the public
engagement process that involve multiple owners, stakeholders, City department, funding
sources and permits.
■ These are very difficult projects that include daylighting Willow Creek to connect the
Marsh with an open channel to Puget Sound, improving the health of the Marsh and its
tributary streams and a number of Perrinville Creek projects.
■ These projects involve WSDOT, Port of Edmonds, BNSF, City of Lynnwood, Tribes,
private property owners and myriad state and federal agencies.
■ Resources need to be allocated to make headway on these important projects and high
priority given to the projects.
■ Projects are extremely complex and have very long timelines
7. Partner with external stakeholders on important regional issues such as salmon recovery,
climate change impacts, barrier culvert removal, and emerging contaminants.
o Several stormwater issues that affect Edmonds will not be solved on our own. These
include climate change impacts, sea level rise, salmon recovery, barrier culvert removal
and emerging contaminates in stormwater.
o City needs to work regionally with partners on these issues to move ahead on topics
important to residents.
8. Train and empower stormwater staff members to thrive in their positions and likely add staff
and additional expertise.
9. Adequately fund the Stormwater Utility to meet all other goals in an equitable and cost-efficient
manner from both stormwater ratepayers and outside sources such as grants and loans. Develop
an equitable financial package to meet these goals.
Councilmember Tibbott said he was intrigued by the list of goals, and agreed the first three were absolutely
essential to the process. Regarding Goal 6, he asked if there was a state or federal authority that could bring
all the pieces together to streamline the work that needs to be done as it seems like a gordian knot. Mr.
Shuster said there is not one agency; there are numerous agencies involved with stormwater and streams
including Fish & Wildlife, Ecology and federal agencies. Councilmember Tibbott asked if there was a state
agency that could cut through the red tape; he did not see how the City could work through all that in a
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 19
Packet Pg. 49
8.2.a
reasonable way. Mr. Shuster answered the City needs a strong, experienced program manager who has
worked on these complex projects as well as a good consultant team. Public Works Director Oscar Antillon
agreed it is very challenging and essential to have staff to perform the review. Many other jurisdictions are
doing the same thing so the City also needs to review their plans and provide input. It requires someone
who understands the environment and can coordinate everything that is happening. Often the City does not
receive input from the agencies who are supposed to provide input or neighboring jurisdictions who are
supposed to participate in the process. Mr. Shuster noted it is difficult because sometimes the City's
priorities are not necessarily the agencies' or other jurisdictions' priorities. Councilmember Tibbott
commented the City's funding challenges in 2024 will not allow hiring more people.
Councilmember Eck was intrigued by the tie in with green streets and she looked forward to hearing more
soon. With regard to empowering staff, she asked about things that could be done, that are not happening
now, to make staff feel empowered. Mr. Shuster answered training is key; the stormwater world is changing
very fast and sending people to the right training so they understand their job and what needs to be done is
important. City Engineer Rob English advised Mr. Shuster will be retiring February 2 so the City will be
losing qualified and experienced staff. Mr. Shuster is a professional who does great work and the City has
been lucky to have him over the years. He started in 2008, left to work at another agency, and came back
to the City 11/2 years ago to stabilize the City's situation after losing Zach Richardson to the City of
Shoreline. That is one of the challenges, recruiting engineers and it will be a difficult to fill Mr. Shuster's
position. Finding qualified staff is a difficult challenge so training and experience is very important.
Councilmember Eck congratulated Mr. Shuster on his retirement. She commented stormwater is very
meaningful work for the City as well as for the climate and security and safety.
Councilmember Paine asked what event catastrophe the plan was planning for. She asked about being in
compliance with Ecology. Mr. Shuster answered the City is currently complying with Ecology and is
actually doing more retrofitting than Ecology requires. The City will have to see what the new permit looks
like. There is some talk that that permit may be appealed, delayed and changed, but that is unknown.
Councilmember Paine observed the City can still set targets that are known to be good and stable because
the science is still solid and lawsuits don't change science. She congratulated Mr. Shuster on his retirement,
commenting she was not happy about it. Ms. Dugopolski advised in the draft manual that Ecology recently
published there is mention of climate change but it hasn't impacted design yet. Some jurisdictions are
proactively looking at upsizing facilities and studying it regionally, but few have taken the jump to actually
upsize facilities. She acknowledged the impact on design is looming and she anticipated it would be in the
plan in the next 5-10 years.
Councilmember Chen congratulated Mr. Shuster on his upcoming retirement. He observed the nine goals
are very ambitious and it will be great if the City can get there. He wondered if there was an annual
evaluation process to determine which goals have been met during the past year. Mr. Shuster answered not
that he knew of, but the next step in the new plan is to write policies related to the goals to ensure progress
is being made. Goals are aspirational at the 20,000 foot level; policies are where the rubber hits the road
and the budget and it remains to be seen whether they can be accomplished.
Councilmember Chen thanked Council President Olson for pointing out Lake Ballinger flooding issues. He
referred to Goal 1, reduce flooding, which is a continuous issue. He referred to the Lake Ballinger Forum
which has been meeting for many years and has similar goals including working with multiple agencies to
resolve issues. He suggested Mr. Shuster's successor work with the Forum. Mr. Shuster said he worked for
the City of Shoreline 20 years ago and was on that group so he is familiar with it. Edmonds' Stormwater
Technician Pat Johnson attends those meetings.
Councilmember Dotsch congratulated Mr. Shuster on his retirement, noting it will be the City's loss. With
regard to Lake Ballinger, she recalled the City planned to purchase property to help with flooding. Mr.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 20
Packet Pg. 50
8.2.a
English answered staff is working on a property acquisition, a house within the flood zone that is currently
vacant where water has entered structure. The City received a grant and is in the process of acquiring that
property; he anticipated learning more about that in the next month. Councilmember Dotsch asked if grant
funding was available for that type of project. Mr. English answered yes, for removing the structure from
the floodplain. In this instance, the property acquisition will allow the City to remove the structure, but it
does not solve the flooding issue. Mr. Shuster advised there are also environmental benefits to restoring the
property and the shoreline. There is a stormwater pipe from SR 104 that discharges into the lake; there is
talk about installing a treatment system on that property to help with water quality entering the lake.
Councilmember Dotsch referred to Mr. Shuster's comment that stormwater systems built before 2010 were
not required to control flows into creeks or treat the runoff, relaying her assumption that many of the City's
stormwater system were older than that. With the challenges of land use, development, the comprehensive
plan, stormwater, capacity issues and events, adding more buildings and roofs, downtown Edmonds is a
bowl, and stormwater is being discharged into waterways and at the same time trying to preserve waterways
from destruction, she was curious how that stormwater reality is addressed in terms of informing land use.
Mr. Shuster responded unlike a sewer system, stormwater regulations are site specific. When someone
builds on a site, they are encouraged to keep the water on their site as long as possible, to infiltrate it into
ground if possible and store the water on site until the rain ends and then release it. Stormwater regulations
are getting more restrictive related to holding water on a building site. Holding water on site impacts the
design of the site and the size of building, kind of a push-pull that is frankly pretty challenging. The state
has some pretty good stormwater rules.
Councilmember Dotsch commented with the volume and runoff of stormwater and silt into creeks, was
there a way to inform council of areas that are challenges to growth. She understood some of those issues
were built into some of the housing legislation. She asked if there were ways to be informed as those issues
are progressing. Mr. English responded the stormwater comprehensive plan has five building blocks, one
of which is identifying capital projects which will include identifying problems within the system and
potential fixes to solve those issues. As Mr. Shuster mentioned, the next version of the permit will
eventually require code amendments to accommodate more conservative stormwater requirements related
to development. The big thing this plan will do is identify capital needs and problem areas and the code
will address development issues. Mr. Shuster advised the capital part of plan includes developing basin
plans that look at what is happening in Shell Creek, Willow Creek, and Shellabarger Creek which will
inform whether a higher flow control standard is required, That takes a lot of work, but staff is heading in
that direction.
Council President Olson observed the goals include addressing pollutants before they enter Puget Sound
and asked whether the plan will include having stormwater treatment channels to Puget Sound and the
creeks to eliminate erosion problems. Mr. Shuster said the basin plans will identify and prioritize areas that
need it the most. Capital projects will then need to be designed to reduce flows to prevent scouring and
sediment or water quality treatment. Most of the City's stormwater system was built when engineers
designed storm systems to get water off roads as quickly as possible and dump it into the streams; retrofits
will be necessary to reverse that.
Ms. Dugopolski reviewed:
• Next Steps
o Develop polices and identify stormwater program needs to meet the goals;
o Finalize needed capital project list for the next 7 years;
o Develop the draft SCP including a financial plan to pay for the identified needs;
o Second round of public engagement to get feedback on the draft SCP;
o Finalize the SCP.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 21
Packet Pg. 51
8.2.a
Councilmember Nand referred to Goal 5 related to education in the community, and asked if it would be
helpful if the council addressed things like manure runoff, the use of pesticides that impact wildlife, etc. via
ordinances. Mr. Shuster answered the City's code related to illicit discharge prohibits direct discharge and
if someone dumps it in the street, that is considered dumping in the storm system. The City does not have
an employee driving around looking for those, but people call all the time to report illicit discharges.
Councilmember Nand said she was referring to lawn care and accidental runoff and asked if that was
something the council could address. Mr. Shuster said the City has had natural yard care seminars in the
past; that could be done again. Ms. Dugopolski said natural yard care was one of topics survey respondents
wanted to hear more about so sharing those materials could be helpful. Councilmember Nand commented
that would be voluntary, but the council could make things mandatory via ordinances.
2. DISCUSSION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO ECC 1.04 COUNCIL
MEETINGS
Council President Olson relayed in government, decisions cannot be made simply by administration; code
based changes have to go through the public process. The council has been meeting at 7 pm for many years
and there have been some changes to the reality in life that may support a change. Although the staff
recommendation in the packet is to have discussion and direct the city attorney to prepare an ordinance, the
intent of this item is discussion only via a round robin to gather the council's input which may include input
they received from the public. She learned after writing the agenda memo that the City of Lynnwood has
been meeting at 6 pm for a couple years and they found it to be an improvement. She did not propose this
based on any other city making that change and was not aware Lynnwood had changed their meeting time.
She has gotten feedback over the past year, usually after a long council meeting when things went off the
rails toward the end and council made bad decisions or used bad process, that making decisions that late at
night may not be prudent.
Councilmember Eck commented it was definitely worth discussing the pros and cons. She agreed the
culture and lifestyle changes over the past few years may make it easier to make this change. She looked
forward to a longer, more robust conversation. She supported revisiting things the council does and not just
continuing to do them just because.
Councilmember Chen said he was personally open to the idea. He has the luxury of being flexible with his
own time, but wanted to take into consideration other councilmembers who are working or potentially
future councilmembers who hold 9-5 jobs as well as the public when deciding whether to begin meetings
an hour earlier. Personally, he welcomed the idea.
Councilmember Tibbott said he also personally welcomed the idea. He reached out to some of the active
participants in council meetings who said moving the time to 6 pm would encourage them to stay through
the end of the meeting which seemed like a positive tradeoff. He ran into Lynnwood's Mayor last night
and asked how the earlier start time worked for them. She said the council is making better decisions at the
end of meetings and she viewed it as a positive change. He summarized it was definitely worth looking into
and agreed public input would be an important part of the decision.
Council President Olson said one of things she ruminated on when proposed this was the council often
convenes prior to meetings such as today's closed session at 6 pm for collective bargaining. If the council
changed the start time of meetings to 6 pm, it would require holding executive sessions at entirely different
times or at the end of meeting which is what the Port of Edmonds does. That would also impact the schedule
as council currently holds executive session before regular meetings. She was also concerned about
excluding the public's participation at meetings, noting even if someone is still at work, they may be able
to provide audience comments via Zoom.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 22
Packet Pg. 52
8.2.a
Council President Olson continued, she did not want to change the meeting time if it impacted working
people with families. The feedback she has received indicated it would be more challenging for people with
young families if meetings started an hour earlier. She reached out a few people who have young families
and work full-time who are interested in civic matters who indicated weeknights are so busy for young
families that the start time didn't matter, they wouldn't participate. Another person agreed it would be
harder, but they would appreciate the council making better decisions, recalling times when the council had
not made good decisions at a late meeting. On balance, most people were more in favor than not. She
appreciated the council thinking about this issue and gathering input about the community's preferences.
For anyone wanting to provide input, the council's email is council@Edmondswa.gov.
Councilmember Dotsch was glad this was open for discussion as it was good to look at things with fresh
eyes. She was in favor of making a change. She recalled being an audience member waiting until 10 pm to
make comments at a public hearing or during audience comments. An earlier meeting start time might shift
the time of the public hearing to earlier in the meeting and encourage more public participation. There are
many ways to engage including via Zoom or email. She pointed out another city has a second opportunity
for public comment later in meeting which would be an option. Another issue related to council meetings
lasting late into the evening is staff having to be at work early the next day. She summarized good decision
making is best done at more normal hours.
Councilmember Paine did not support making any change to regular meetings. She agreed the council asks
better questions earlier in meeting which is why it is important to hold closed meetings or executive sessions
prior to regular meeting as that is where the council is considering information dense topics. She also
supported the council meeting at a time when it is the most convenient for the public to provide input. Most
people transition from work life to home life at 6 pm which allows them to participate in council meetings
starting at 7 pm. She appreciated looking at this, but felt it would be a tough transition when it involves a
lot of people. She acknowledged the council does not always finish their meetings on time, but that can be
self -regulated by submitting questions to staff early, staying on topic and moving things along. There is
always room for improvement and councilmembers need to do everything they can before making a change
like this.
Councilmember Paine continued, she was not in favor of changing the meeting start time. With regard to
executive sessions, she agreed short updates could happen at the end of the meeting, but for new topic that
requires discussion between council, staff and the city attorney, in her opinion those need to occur in
advance of the regular meeting. She did not want to make it difficult for councilmembers and community
members to come to meetings. There have been occasions when the council chambers are full of people
who want to speak to the council; it is the council's obligation to ensure people have an opportunity to
speak to council. With regard to the second issue, a recess from council meeting, she supported that idea.
Councilmember Nand thanked Councilmembers Chen and Paine for expressing concerns about equity and
potentially shutting the door on participation from various segments of the community. She attempted to
discreetly share her personal concerns about changing the start time and how it would impact her via email.
To illustrate her point, she shared a story, her high school tennis team did a secret Santa and one girl could
not afford to participate. The coach handled it well, saying not everyone can afford to spend money so
please don't pressure people who leave a nice note instead of buying a snack. Councilmember Nand said
felt the response of this council to her request to handle this in a more discreet fashion instead of having to
lay out how it would personally impact her in a very negative way was as if the coach said to that girl that
she had to stand up in front of all her classmate and publicly expose herself by telling everyone she's poorer
than all the other kids on the team.
Council President Olson commented this was on the agenda before that email came through. With regard
to the second topic, changing the code to provide a recess from council meetings, potentially the last
meeting in August and first meeting in September, that is something done in other cities. This would not
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 23
Packet Pg. 53
8.2.a
mean that the City or all councilmembers would be on vacation that week, just that meetings wouldn't be
held. The administration was asked whether they could support this. Mayor Rosen said the staff members
who had an opportunity to respond were in favor, advising there would need to be some accommodation
for approval processes, but it was not a fatal flaw.
Councilmember Eck understood the council was not making a decision tonight, only providing their initial
thoughts in preparation for further conversation at another time. Her initial thought about the recess was a
break would be incredibly beneficial as everyone needs self -care and it would give staff time to plan around
it.
Councilmember Chen expressed support for a break in August and the last two weeks of December.
Councilmember Tibbott recalled last year when he, Council President Olson and the council's executive
assistant worked on the council's schedule, that timeframe was optimal because there is also a holiday the
first week of September and would give people an opportunity for a 3-day weekend and still be engaged.
That time period is optimal for break and he supports it.
Council President Olson commented it could also be important from a morale standpoint. She noted if this
were changed in the code, it could be changed back. As a parent, that back -to -school week is very intense,
a lot of information coming home and a lot of to-do's. Having a recess the last week of August and the first
week of September would have an extra advantage for councilmembers and staff who are also parents and
would also include the holiday when many have the day off.
Councilmember Dotsch expressed support for a break. She saw it as an opportunity for a mental break and
it was good timing in anticipation of things that ramp up after that. It may give staff extra time to things
prepared. She agreed it was a good idea on multiple fronts.
Councilmember Paine expressed support for the proposed recess. She hoped when the council discussed it
again, it would be discussed on the dais and not at the retreat where the council doesn't make decisions.
Councilmember Nand abstained from providing input.
10. MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Mayor Rosen relayed since the last regular meeting, there was celebration, aspiration and inspiration related
to the diversity of the community through Martin Luther King Jr. Day and Korean American Day. There
was also valuable partnerships with other organizations when the disaster at the library turned into an
opportunity that hundreds came to celebrate. There was value in partnering with the people of Edmonds;
the youth commission, planning board, art commission, tree board, climate protection committee and the
diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility commission all met since the last meeting. He summarized the
people of Edmonds come together to make this great place even greater and he loves this place.
11. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Eck said she was reminded of the silent heroes on City staff who prepared the roads for
the artic weather the area has experienced. She appreciated the use of more environmentally friendly
products on the roads. This is an example of staff taking care of the community, silently making sure the
community is provided for. She shared her gratitude for staff.
Councilmember Chen commented on how lucky we are to live in this City and community where diversity
is celebrated and every voice is lifted. He participated in the uplifting Korean American Day celebration
that included good food and good programs. He commented on last night's inspirational Martin Luther
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 24
Packet Pg. 54
8.2.a
King Jr. Day celebration. He encourage everyone to look out for one another and help each other at times.
It is very tempting to escalate conflicts and he encouraged people to step back and treat each other like
brothers and sisters to make the planet a better place.
Councilmember Tibbott echoed Councilmember Chen's comments about last night's inspiring celebration.
He was particularly touched by the family of the slain rideshare driver and thanked Councilmember Nand
for orchestrating that moment. It was an opportunity for Edmonds to express their grief and sadness with
that tragedy. It was very meaningful for the City and hopeful for the victim's family and friends as well.
Council President Olson highlighted Received for Filing Item 4, City of Edmonds Facility Condition
Assessment Update by McKinstry, explaining items on the agenda under Received for Filing may
communicate that something is not important which is not the case for this item. It has gone through
committee and will come back to full council. Having it on the agenda under Received for Filing was an
opportunity to provide it in advance as it will be fundamental in the City's long range financial planning.
Council President Olson said she has attended the BID's annual meeting and was unsure if they used a
gavel, but there was definitely business conducted and information shared. The monthly board meetings
are open to all members as well as the public. If there is some way the BID can improve their process, she
was sure they would be open to change.
With regard to the library reopening, Council President Olson said she was unaware how many staff
members were involved with the library project as well as with the library opening. She expressed her
appreciation to them, commenting it was a happy, celebratory occasion that everyone can feel great about.
Councilmember Dotsch echoed other councilmembers' comments, noting she was not able to attend all the
event but attended the library reopening and was excited to see a packed house. The work that went into
the library rehab was phenomenal; it is very open, exciting and the kids seem to love the kids area. She
thanked staff who are out at crazy hours ensuring the roads are safe and was glad to hear the City was using
environmental friendly products.
Councilmember Dotsch reported she attended the historic preservation commission and the youth
commission meetings as the council liaison. Community volunteers help inform the council and it is very
exciting to hear from them and the work they do. She thanked all the volunteers who give their time to the
City.
COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER CHEN, TO
EXTEND TO 10:10. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Councilmember Paine echoed the council's comments. She reported last night's program presented by
Donnie Griffin and Lift Every Voice Legacy was about reclaiming the dream. She thanked Councilmember
Nand for organizing to have the murder victim's family and the rideshare president there. Reclaiming the
dream means exactly what Mr. Griffin said, it is the council's responsibility to eliminate hate and mistrust
and to have good dialogue and be part of the Beloved Community. That is a priority for her and she hoped
it was for others. The Lift Every Voice is a marvelous, uplifting program that make you feel good about the
people who live here, joining together with a bigger goal in mind. She was dismayed and disheartened by
gun violence and taking of the life of a young man the same age as her children. Gun violence does not
belong in Edmonds. Education, being meaningful about showing love, and protecting the community is
important.
Councilmember Nand thanked Chami Joe Ro and Carolyn LaFave in the mayor's office for their hard work
on the Korean American Day proclamation and inviting a contingent from Edmonds to Burien to read the
proclamation. She also thanked Imraan Siddiqi and Katie Walker, Council on American Islamic Relations,
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 25
Packet Pg. 55
8.2.a
Washington State Chapter; Chief Michelle Bennett and Commander Josh McClure, Edmonds Police
Department; Ahmed Mumin, Seattle Rideshare Driver's Association; and Donnie Griffin, Lift Every Voice
Legacy; for facilitating Abdirahman Shariif and Uma Shariff s attendance at last night's Reclaim the Dream
Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. celebration and giving them a safe and respectful place in which to address the
community. There was a very beautiful moment in which Mr. Mumin thanked and shook hands with Police
Chief Bennett on behalf of the Edmonds Police Department. At the end of the presentation, the Board of
Lift Every Voice Legacy presented Abdirahman, Abdikadir's little brother, and Uma, Abdikadir's little
sister, with a bouquet of flowers. That was a real testament to the spirit of Edmonds and how we react to
tragedy; we try to find a way to heal and grow together.
12. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 10:03 p.m.
Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes
January 16, 2024
Page 26
Packet Pg. 56
8.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Dave Turley
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Nori Jacobson
Background/History
Approval of claim checks #261007 through #261093 dated January 18, 2024 for $1,400,159.61 (re -issued
checks #261030 $16,666.00, #261041 $1,872.56, #261067 $207.00 & #261068 $71.50) and wire
payments of $3,997.33 & $30,791.37.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of claim checks and wire payments.
Narrative
The Council President shall be designated as the auditing committee for the city council. The council
president shall review the documentation supporting claims paid and review for approval by the city
council at its next regular public meeting all checks or warrants issued in payment of any claim, demand
or voucher. A list of each claim, demand or voucher approved and each check or warrant issued
indicating the check or warrant number, the amount paid and the vendor or payee shall be filed in the
city council office for review by individual councilmembers prior to each regularly scheduled public
meeting.
Attachments:
Claims 01-18-24 agenda copy
Packet Pg. 57
8.3.a
apPosPay Positive Pay Listing Page: 1
1/18/2024 12:32:55PM City of Edmonds
Document group: jacobson
Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount
075085
1 LINGUA LLC
261007
1/18/2024
1,122.00
079319
ADVANCED POWER LLC
261008
1/18/2024
17,430.27
000850
ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT
261009
1/18/2024
137,473.60
069751
ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES
261010
1/18/2024
384.26
079353
ASPECT CONSULTING LLC
261011
1/18/2024
5,013.68
001699
ASSOC OF WA CITIES
261012
1/18/2024
2,480.00
064341
AT&T MOBILITY
261013
1/18/2024
1,749.08
071174
AXON ENTERPRISE INC
261014
1/18/2024
69,174.50
069226
BHC CONSULTANTS LLC
261015
1/18/2024
12,500.00
071421
BIO CLEAN INC
261016
1/18/2024
469.63
073029
CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
261017
1/18/2024
362.87
069813
CDW GOVERNMENT INC
261018
1/18/2024
21,909.28
003510
CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY
261019
1/18/2024
255.74
035160
CITY OF SEATTLE
261020
1/18/2024
27.48
074255
COAL CREEK ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOC
261021
1/18/2024
3,717.18
076783
COMBAT FIRST AID -FOREMAN CONSL
261022
1/18/2024
3,420.00
064531
DINES, JEANNIE
261023
1/18/2024
560.00
075153
DOPPS, MARIA
261024
1/18/2024
130.00
007253
DUNN LUMBER
261025
1/18/2024
398.71
007675
EDMONDS AUTO PARTS
261026
1/18/2024
7.46
071969
EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS
261027
1/18/2024
15,000.00
007775
EDMONDS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
261028
1/18/2024
5,000.00
076610
EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE
261029
1/18/2024
32.02
038500
EDMONDS SENIOR CENTER
261030
1/18/2024
16,666.00
008705
EDMONDS WATER DIVISION
261031
1/18/2024
3,224.83
075200
EDUARDO ZALDIBAR
261032
1/18/2024
130.00
008812
ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES
261033
1/18/2024
785.21
009350
EVERETT DAILY HERALD
261034
1/18/2024
20.64
075673
FARMER, MARIA
261035
1/18/2024
390.00
072493
FIRSTLINE COMMUNICATIONS INC
261036
1/18/2024
292.83
079465
GCH DISASTER SOLUTIONS
261037
1/18/2024
9,225.00
079505
HEBBAABULSAAD
261038
1/18/2024
130.00
066575
HERC RENTALS INC
261039
1/18/2024
2,946.52
072647
HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL
261040
1/18/2024
6,012.39
070673
HID GLOBAL CORPORATION
261041
1/18/2024
1,872.56
078923
HKAGLOBAL INC
261042
1/18/2024
1,207.50
067862
HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
261043
1/18/2024
702.41
061013
HONEY BUCKET
261044
1/18/2024
290.95
072422
JE HORTON INTERPRETING SVCS
261045
1/18/2024
130.00
076136
JEFFANDERSON
261046
1/18/2024
1,250.00
079491
KALILIKANE CONSULTING SVCS LLC
261047
1/18/2024
252.00
067568
KPG PSOMAS INC
261048
1/18/2024
131,200.57
074158
LASER UNDERGROUND & EARTHWORKS
261049
1/18/2024
131,602.92
073603
LIGHTHOUSE LAW GROUP PLLC
261050
1/18/2024
61,223.90
075149
LIM, VANNARA
261051
1/18/2024
130.00
067235
MARYS TOWING INC
261052
1/18/2024
280.67
074556
MOORE, IACOFANO & GOLTSMAN INC
261053
1/18/2024
5,626.73
069689
MULTI SVC TECH SOLUTIONS INC
261054
1/18/2024
28.03
075735
PACIFIC SECURITY
261055
1/18/2024
4,129.81
069873
PAPE MACHINERY INC
261056
1/18/2024
423.57
065051
PARAMETRIX INC
261057
1/18/2024
7,289.55
027450
PAWS
261058
1/18/2024
1,404.00
079464
PERKINS EASTMAN ARCHITECTS DPC
261059
1/18/2024
64,592.38
Page: 1
Packet Pg. 58
8.3.a
apPosPay Positive Pay Listing
1/18/2024 12:32:55PM City of Edmonds
Document group: jacobson
Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount
028860
PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY
261060
1/18/2024
635.52
029117
PORT OF EDMONDS
261061
1/18/2024
4,567.65
079448
PUGET SOUND ENERGY
261062
1/18/2024
708.00
074712
RAINIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAB
261063
1/18/2024
900.00
068657
ROBERT HALF
261064
1/18/2024
1,876.88
065044
ROTARY CLUB OF EDMONDS
261065
1/18/2024
1,000.00
079080
SENTRY EQUIPMENT CO
261066
1/18/2024
207,121.18
077345
SHAPE GUARD
261067
1/18/2024
207.00
077345
SHAPE GUARD
261068
1/18/2024
71.50
079492
SKYCORP LTD
261069
1/18/2024
104,124.14
037375
SNO CO PUD NO 1
261070
1/18/2024
7,042.18
063941
SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE
261071
1/18/2024
31,538.08
063941
SNO CO SHERIFFS OFFICE
261072
1/18/2024
3,000.00
037303
SO SNOHOMISH CO FIRE & RESCUE
261073
1/18/2024
20,077.81
038300
SOUND DISPOSAL CO
261074
1/18/2024
4,903.54
079501
SOUND DRILLING LLC
261075
1/18/2024
302.40
039775
STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE
261076
1/18/2024
2,882.25
079502
STAVIG, CRANE
261077
1/18/2024
314.40
079136
THE GORDIAN GROUP INC
261078
1/18/2024
649.23
066056
THE SEATTLE TIMES
261079
1/18/2024
2,000.00
079500
TRAFFIC LOGIX CORPORATION
261080
1/18/2024
41,147.99
068141
TRANSPO GROUP
261081
1/18/2024
36,796.70
071549
UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA INC
261082
1/18/2024
1,758.07
067865
VERIZON WIRELESS
261083
1/18/2024
27.48
079503
WAHI, SANTOSH
261084
1/18/2024
130.00
075155
WALKER MACY LLC
261085
1/18/2024
10,622.50
067917
WALLY'STOWING INC
261086
1/18/2024
561.84
078314
WASTE MGMT DISPOSAL SVC OF OR
261087
1/18/2024
164,001.74
065568
WATER SERVICES NW INC
261088
1/18/2024
56.63
073552
WELCO SALES LLC
261089
1/18/2024
749.75
077286
WSP USA INC
261090
1/18/2024
14,162.81
071634
ZAYO GROUP LLC
261091
1/18/2024
1,840.13
011900
ZIPLY FIBER
261092
1/18/2024
689.74
079499
ZIPLY FIBER
261093
1/18/2024
430.80
G randTotal :
1,418,976.67
Total count:
87
Page: 2
Packet Pg. 59
8.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Staff Lead: Kimberly Dunscombe
Department: Administrative Services
Preparer: Lori Palmer
Background/History
Approval of clothing allowance checks #65944 through #65947 and direct deposit dated January 11,
2024 for $11,208.47, payroll checks #65948 through #65950 dated January 19, 2024 for $8,289.66,
direct deposit for $890,132.37, benefit checks #65951 through #65957 and wire payments for
$850,199.50 for the pay period of January 1, 2024 to January 15, 2024.
Staff Recommendation
Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments.
Narrative
In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance
#2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or
non -approval of payments.
Attachments:
benefit checks summary report 01-19-2024
payroll earnings summary report 01-10-2024
payroll earnings summary report 01-19-2024
Packet Pg. 60
Benefit Checks Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,139 - 01/01/2024 to 01/15/2024
Bank: usbank - US Bank
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
65951
01/19/2024
bpas
BPAS
6,010.39
0.00
65952
01/19/2024
chap1
CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE
175.00
0.00
65953
01/19/2024
epoa2
EPOA-POLICE
6,831.00
0.00
65954
01/19/2024
epoa3
EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT
1,030.76
0.00
65955
01/19/2024
icma
MISSIONSQUARE PLAN SERVICES
6,120.47
0.00
65956
01/19/2024
flex
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS
5,463.01
0.00
65957
01/19/2024
teams
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763
6,831.76
0.00
32,462.39
0.00
Bank: wire - US BANK
Check #
Date
Payee #
Name
Check Amt
Direct Deposit
3621
01/19/2024
awc
AWC
444,586.59
0.00
3627
01/19/2024
mebt
WTRISC FBO #N3177B1
160,761.14
0.00
3628
01/19/2024
us
US BANK
170,508.70
0.00
3630
01/19/2024
pb
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
5,055.83
0.00
3631
01/19/2024
wadc
WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER
36,119.85
0.00
3633
01/19/2024
oe
OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
705.00
0.00
817,737.11
0.00
Grand Totals: 850,199.50
0.00
8.4.a
d
L_
vi
v
d
s
w
a�
c
m
c
ca
0
M
CL
0
�a
O
L
Q
Q
Q
N
0
N
d>
0
1=
0
a
m
L
M
E
E
n
d
s
w
m
c
m
w
c
m
E
s
c�
r
r
Q
1/19/2024 Packet Pg. 61
Hour Type Hour Class
903 MISCELLANEOUS
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,168 (01/10/2024 to 01/10/2024)
Description
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
Hours
N M
Amount
12,600.00
0.00 $12,600.00
Total Net Pay: $11,208.47
8.4.b
01/19/2024 Packet Pg. 62
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,139 (01/01/2024 to 01/15/2024)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
118
ABSENT
UNPAID L & 1
88.00
0.00
121
SICK
SICK LEAVE
633.25
29,804.42
122
VACATION
VACATION
830.00
43,500.01
123
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY HOURS
284.00
13,026.38
124
HOLIDAY
FLOATER HOLIDAY
35.00
1,507.51
125
COMP HOURS
COMPENSATORY TIME
149.75
7,728.23
128
HOLIDAY
Holiday Bank WWTP
209.00
9,936.84
131
MILITARY
MILITARY LEAVE
48.00
2,710.57
141
BEREAVEMENT
BEREAVEMENT
16.00
726.82
150
REGULAR HOURS
Kelly Day Used
12.00
782.21
155
COMP HOURS
COMPTIME AUTO PAY
116.66
6,791.08
157
SICK
SICK LEAVE PAYOFF
39.11
1,007.34
160
VACATION
MANAGEMENT LEAVE
12.00
1,097.85
190
REGULAR HOURS
REGULAR HOURS
17,291.75
904,620.64
210
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -STRAIGHT
241.25
13,192.40
215
OVERTIME HOURS
WATER WATCH STANDBY
38.00
2,713.17
216
MISCELLANEOUS
STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT
4.00
494.19
220
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME 1.5
552.25
49,012.43
225
OVERTIME HOURS
OVERTIME -DOUBLE
45.50
4,710.47
400
MISCELLANEOUS
MISC PAY
0.00
2,000.00
410
MISCELLANEOUS
WORKING OUT OF CLASS
0.00
3,952.30
411
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL
0.00
2,710.61
600
RETROACTIVE PAY
RETROACTIVE PAY
0.00
723.87
602
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP 1.0
115.50
0.00
604
COMP HOURS
ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5
176.25
0.00
902
MISCELLANEOUS
BOOT ALLOWANCE
0.00
19,008.00
acc
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCREDITATION PAY
0.00
348.70
acs
MISCELLANEOUS
ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT
0.00
255.71
colre
MISCELLANEOUS
Collision Reconstruction ist
0.00
54.76
cpl
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAINING CORPORAL
0.00
201.58
crt
MISCELLANEOUS
CERTIFICATION III PAY
0.00
118.83
ctr
MISCELLANEOUS
CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM
0.00
240.00
deftat
MISCELLANEOUS
DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
94.36
det
MISCELLANEOUS
DETECTIVE PAY
0.00
138.08
det4
MISCELLANEOUS
Detective 4%
0.00
972.90
01/19/2024 Packet Pg. 63
Payroll Earnings Summary Report
City of Edmonds
Pay Period: 1,139 (01/01/2024 to 01/15/2024)
Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount
ed1
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 2%
0.00
921.44
ed2
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 4%
0.00
575.92
ed3
EDUCATION PAY
EDUCATION PAY 6%
0.00
10,873.93
firear
MISCELLANEOUS
FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR
0.00
532.94
fmla
ABSENT
FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAID
27.00
0.00
fmis
SICK
FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK
40.00
2,484.88
hol
HOLIDAY
HOLIDAY
2,799.72
148,308.39
k9
MISCELLANEOUS
K-9 PAY
0.00
269.53
less
MISCELLANEOUS
LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR
0.00
144.62
Iq1
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2%
0.00
1,027.00
Ig11
LONGEVITY
LONGEVITY PAY 2.5%
0.00
1,440.10
Ig12
LONGEVITY
Longevity 9%
0.00
1,439.16
Ig13
LONGEVITY
Longevity 7%
0.00
1,349.83
Ig14
LONGEVITY
Longevity 5%
0.00
777.69
Iq2
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY PAY 4%
0.00
166.92
Iq3
LONGEVITY PAY
LONGEVITY 6%
0.00
289.83
Iq4
LONGEVITY
Longevity 1%
0.00
1,283.36
Iq5
LONGEVITY
Longevity 3%
0.00
3,098.03
Iq7
LONGEVITY
Longevity 1.5%
0.00
507.60
mtc
MISCELLANEOUS
MOTORCYCLE PAY
0.00
138.08
pfmh
HOLIDAY
Paid Family Medical Holiday
18.00
894.96
pfmk
KELLY DAY
Paid Family Medical Kelly Day
12.75
764.92
pfmp
ABSENT
Paid Familv Medical Unpaid/Sup
176.25
0.00
pfms
SICK
Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK
57.00
2,923.42
phv
MISCELLANEOUS
PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY
0.00
2,251.35
st
REGULAR HOURS
Serqeant Pay
0.00
164.27
str
MISCELLANEOUS
STREET CRIMES
0.00
219.02
traf
MISCELLANEOUS
TRAFFIC
0.00
262.90
vap
VACATION
Vacation Premium
12.00
719.93
24,079.99 $1,308,012.28
Total Net Pay: $898,422.03
8.4.c
R
01/19/2024 Packet Pg. 64
9.1
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Update
Staff Lead: Todd Tatum
Department: Community Services
Preparer: Todd Tatum
Background/History
The vision for the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor has been developing for almost 20 years. Originally
discussed by Parks and Cultural Services and the Planning Board in 2002-2004 as a way to connect the
new performing arts center and Main Street, the project has gone through many iterations. Two years
prior to the project presented tonight, the city contracted with CREA consultants to create a 10%
concept design for the majority of the corridor south from Edmonds Street to just north of Main Street.
This project ended with a presentation to Council on the preferred street design - a one-way north
configuration retaining parking on both sides.
The most recent project began in 2022 with a $34,000 capital grant from ArtsWA, with matching funds
from the city. This project was designed to complete the concept design from Edmonds Street to 3rd Ave
N. in partnership with Edmonds Center for the Arts and in the context of reviewing past design
elements. The purpose of the project was to make this important pedestrian connection between
Downtown Edmonds' premier arts/culture venue and the restaurant, shops and services of Main Street
and heart of Downtown Edmonds a safer, more welcoming, more inviting, and more interesting
pedestrian experience, maximizing connectivity between Downtown, ECA and the new Civic Park.
The portion of 4th Avenue subject to this project is in fair to poor condition. The existing roadway
pavement is in poor condition and will need to be resurfaced in a few years. The sidewalks are aging
cement concrete that are in poor condition and varies in width from 5 to 7 feet along the corridor. The
five feet wide sections often have street sign and lighting poles next to the curb which further reduce
sidewalk width. A majority of the ADA ramps and crosswalks at the intersections of 4th and Main Street,
Bell Street, Daley Street and near 3rd Avenue N, do not meet ADA standards. The water mains are in
need of replacement, and while there is no need to rush this maintenance, it is one more item to take
into account when planning the future of the Corridor.
Public engagement was conducted for this project, starting at the end of June to late August 2023. This
started with a booth at the Summer Market and an open house at ECA, and ended with a walking tour of
the Corridor where residents and interested individuals could see the project elements on the ground
and discuss with the project team their impacts. About 30 people attended the open house events,
while more information was gathered at the market and using an online survey.
Edmonds Center for the Arts was included in the project team in order to ensure compatibility between
right of way design and future improvements that may be implemented on the adjoining Public Facilities
District property. An idea for the frontage of the building was developed for discussion purposes, but
remains at a high level.
Packet Pg. 65
9.1
The attached 10% plan calls for raised intersections, curb bulbs, an expanded bulb out area at Sprague,
improved pedestrian lighting, replacement of water utilities, resurfacing, and an expansion of the 5 foot
sections of sidewalk by 1.5 feet into the city's ROW at a cost of $9,764,000 in 2026 inflation -adjusted
dollars. As discussed below, this number is not a request for funding at this time.
Staff Recommendation
Our next step in this project is to get to 30% design. Staff recommends departing from the full
compliment of construction outlined in the attachment due to cost, cost/benefit, the character of the
existing neighborhood, and the need to lock in the core components of this project.
Staff recommends moving the following components to 30% design:
- Widening the sidewalk by approximately 1.5 feet to make the sidewalks ADA accessible
- Pedestrian lighting improvements along the sidewalks
- Including curb bulb -outs along with ADA improvements at the intersections along the corridor
- Including water main replacement and road resurfacing in this project
- Replacement of "Luminous Forest" roadway art installation during resurfacing work
Staff also recommends conceptualizing the project as a necessary package of improvements to
downtown and funding 30% design subject to budget availability in future years. There is no budgetary
ask associated with this agenda item for 2024 or 2025.
Narrative
As noted in the background section, the concepts for this project have been part of an ongoing
discussion for twenty years. During this time, the visitation to downtown has grown, events have
expanded, amenities have improved, and the regulatory requirements for ADA improvements have
increased (along with our desire to address them). ECA's visitation and regional importance has also
increased, putting additional pedestrian demand on the streetscape. The condition of the roadway,
sidewalks and cross walks continues to deteriorate and safety for pedestrians is an ongoing concern. The
pedestrian experience is poor for able-bodied people, and extremely challenging for those with
disabilities or mobility issues. This project is as important as it's ever been for those reasons alone.
During our outreach, residents questioned the cost of the more grand ideas contained in previous
iterations of planning while interest in the aesthetic and pedestrian experience remained strong.
Residents expressed concern about the walkability of the existing sidewalks, remarking that a narrower
sidewalk than previously proposed would still be a significant improvement. It is important to note that
the sidewalk expansion uses the city's right of way, which extends many feet into residents' yards.
Residents and attendees at the open houses also expressed the need to keep improvements in line with
the character of the homes and shops along the Corridor, which is also in keeping with the intent of the
BD5 Arts Corridor zoning for the area.
Retaining the spirit of the Cultural Corridor in a more modest project, providing for ADA improvements,
moderate additions to pedestrian space at intersections, pedestrian lighting, and incorporating our
existing infrastructure projects seamlessly into these can keep costs under control, while providing much
needed improvements which will serve a proportionally large number of city pedestrians.
Attachments:
4th Ave Cultural Corridor 10 Percent Design
Packet Pg. 66
I
l-
OFFOMONDS.NI -
i
j.. � O • J � J,fl `� j
0
0
U
0
A
d
U
m
Q
t
w
-tOV EDtij� c
v E
Q
Packet Pg. 67
9.1.a
this page intentionally left blank
Q
Packet Pg. 68
9.1.a
4TH AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDOR TEAM
EdmO ^'
Public hdlWes District
edmonds center for the arts
Joe Mclalwain
Former Executive Director
Lori Meagher
Associate Executive Director
Nicole Giordano
Director of Patron Experience
Liz Dawson
Director of Programming & Communications
Suzy Maloney
Edmonds Public Facilities District Board
Corbitt Loch
Edmonds Center for the Arts Board
Jeannne Thorsen
Edmonds Center for the Arts Board
Todd Tatum
Community Services Director
Frances Chapin
Arts & Culture Manager
Mike De Lilla
Senior Utilities Engineer
Bertrand Hauss
Transportation Engineer
Kelsey Foster
Communications Strategist/PIO
u pC"4
Paul Fuesel
Senior Landscape ArchitectlUrban Designer
Project Manager
Phuong Nguyen
Senior Landscape Architect/Urban Designer
Stakeholder Outreach
Holly Williams
Senior Landscape ArchitectlUrban Designer
Streetscope Design
Jake Stephens
LandscapelUrban Designer
Graphics & Communication
Kelsey Anderson
Civil Engineer
Michael Lapham
Transportation Planner
Grant Funding
Packet Pg. 69
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Whythis Project..............................................................................
Project Background.....................................................................................
Site Context In Downtown Edmonds ....................................
VisionGoals......................................................................................................
Review of Existing Conditions and 2020 Concept
Funding And Criteria For Grants .................................
......5 Project Phasing.................................................................................
.......6 Appendix A
.......7 Stakeholder Outreach Materials ..................................
.......8 Appendix B
9-15 Stakeholder Outreach & Feedback Log ....................
Roadway Pavement Condition............................................................................ 9
Sidewalk Pavement Condition, and (ADA)....................................................... 9
Corridor Utilities............................................................................................
10-1 1
The 2020 Plan Review from Fire Marshall and Emergency Response
....... 11
Existing Sidewalks Widths..................................................................................12
Private Property Lines and Right of Way (ROW).........................................1
2
Traffic Circulation and On -Street Parking.......................................................13
Vehicular Access to Properties...........................................................................14
Parcels and Existing Land use Along the Corridor........................................14
Edmond Center for the Arts Frontage Idea.....................................................15
Community and Stakeholder Outreach............................................16-19
Overview.......................................................................................................
16-17
Notification and Publications.............................................................................18
Reoccurring Public Feedback.............................................................................19
Updated 10% Plan Project Elements.....................................................20-25
ECAFrontage Ideas............................................................................................24
Activation and Closure of Street for Programmed Events ...........................25
10% Illustrative Plan............................................................................................25
10% Illustrative Plan Layout..........................................................................26-27
10% Roadway Plan Layout.............................................................................28-31
CostEstimate.....................................................................................................................32-33
4
Packet Pg. 70
9.1.a
INTRODUCTION
Why this Project?
Discussion of the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor over the past
17 years emerged originally from the recognition that a
new performing arts center at the north end of 4th Avenue
would bring visitors, vibrancy, and economic vitality into the
downtown and that it was important to support and foster
the flow of people between this attraction and the downtown
retail and restaurant sector. Edmonds Center for the Arts is
a prime destination bringing economic vitality to downtown
Edmonds, however the connecting corridor is currently a weak
link limiting potential vibrancy and community use.
The impact of the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor concept is far
greater than sidewalk, lighting and roadway improvements
along one of the oldest streets in downtown Edmonds. The 4th
Avenue Corridor is a catalyst connector in a highly walkable
Figure 1: 4th Avenue looking northeast towards ECA
downtown, linking to Main St. businesses, to the new Civic Park, and towards the
waterfront. The street embodies much of the history of downtown Edmonds and should
better showcase the historic 1910 High School, historic homes, and offices, and even
the non -conforming orientation of the street layout which predates the overall north -
south east -west street grid. Improvements along this segment of 4th Avenue will enhance
the whole experience of downtown Edmonds for residents, downtown visitors, and ECA
patrons.
The Cultural Corridor is currently a poor link, that is in poor condition, for both pedestrian
and vehicular traffic. There have been accidents including a pedestrian fatality, as it is
not uncommon to see people walking in the street, because the sidewalks are narrow
and uneven with inadequate ADA accommodations.
The 4th Avenue Corridor project focuses on retaining the character of the street, the
intimacy and historic nature of small homes and buildings, while improving the pedestrian
experience of residents and visitors who frequent the corridor on popular walking routes,
during programmed events, and as a destination to the performing arts. Enhancing
this experience on 4th Avenue with wider unencumbered and inviting sidewalks, ADA
compliant crosswalks, improved street lighting, traffic calming at intersections, and
creative visual and landscape elements expands the downtown experience and time
spent by visitors.
The basics of the project:
1. Retain intimacy and historic character of corridor with inviting, safe, and comfortable
pedestrian amenities.
2. Impact of improvements will be broad reaching and utilized by a wider range of
visiors.
3. Expand the overall inventory of downtown experience, and enhance vital connections.
4. Leverage planned utility improvements into community improvements through utility
upgrades planned for at least water lines in near future. This is an opportunity to
then upgrade street pavement and sidewalks that are currently in a bad condition.
Packet Pg. 71
9.1.a
PROJECT BACKGROUND
This vision has been developing for almost 20 years, through continuing
conceptual design and stakeholder outreach. The history of the Fourth
Avenue Cultural Corridor's studies and development are summarized as
follows:
2002-04 - Ideas discussed by Parks & Cultural Services and Planning Board
for connecting new arts center and Main St. and highlighting the unique
character of 4th Ave.
2005-06 - Planning Board zoning changes, creation of BD 5 zone for 4th
Avenue Arts Corridor, concept part of downtown/waterfront activity center
planning in Comprehensive Plan.
2006 - Update of Streetscape Plan including Appendix on Arts Corridor,
reviewed by Planning Board and adopted by City Council.
2008-09 - National Park Service Preserve America matching grant of
$50,000 for preliminary concept design of Cultural Corridor, public process
conducted by consultant SVR. Quarterly updates to Planning Board.
2012-15 - Preserve America grant to create "Stages of History" public art
installation by Judith Caldwell in downtown highlighting history on 4th Ave.,
City contribution approved in budget process by City Council.
2014 - Community Cultural Plan update, PROS Plan update, both including
4th Avenue Arts corridor, adopted by City Council.
2016 - Public art, "Luminous Forest" by lole Alessandrini, roadway light
installation celebrated in partnership with ECA front lawn event. Jointly
funded by Edmonds Arts Commission and Edmonds Arts Festival Foundation
with approval by City Council.
0
2017-18 - Public meetings regarding 5-year work plan for Creative District
identified 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor as a capital project priority in the
City Council approved application to State of Washington.
2019-20 - Parks Department budgeted contract with CREA consultants to
create 10% concept design for majority of corridor south from Edmonds St.
to just north of Main St. Included public process, Creative District Advisory
Committee, Arts Commission, and neighborhood meeting. Presentation
regarding preferred street design at City Council with public meeting,
approved one-way north configuration retaining parking on both sides.
2022 — City Council budget process approval of match for grant from
ArtsWA of $34,000 to complete concept design from Edmonds St. to 3rd
Ave. in partnership with Edmonds Center for the Arts (this plan).
Figure 2: Edmonds High School (Source: ECA)
PROJECT SITE CONTEXT IN DOWNTOWN EDMONDS
'L
O
U
IN
4th Ave Cultural Corridor
Caspers St U
E r r 1 r 1 r .. i, Access to and from waterfront
Downtown Creative District Boundary
EDMONDS CENTER
_ Q
Proposed Cultural Corridor Gateway - FOR THE ARTS �
Nodes: pedestrian amenties, art, lighting,
landscaping & placemaking elements -
Proposed Cultural Corridor Activation / ShellCr
Nodes: pedestrian amenties, art, landscap-
ing, %,� < Glen St eP� C
wayfinding & placemaking elements Eq aQ �o`
„ OVA) 3i l i >
0ex exHististing historical Walking
Tour
unique theme • y♦♦♦♦♦ '��rs i��i�e� y� :' kaley St
�` rn
Existing Mural Sprague St
""�.,,��-"fit-:• p 9 �
,�'�, ,,^s,•C LOCATION OF
!i G
• • • • • • • �` /Ilerr�'S''"''('" BULB OUT SPACEcivic
• p, ,'� C�
♦♦♦ 8y•i ���� �J4
PARK
�EDMONDS d ea\k' SUMMER
�e��`���n (/y. MARKET O
®�r�� : •'�/i,. Bell St `p
CASCADIA .............. } "C
ART MUSEUM ¢`' ���'''•,,, •'.,� i L
��a° ``® clrY �� o
HALL U
Main St L
.�.'"�nIUIIIIII111111Jllluiiiiu ...................... 7
r; EDMONDS EDMONDS PUBLIC LIBRARY
'i. HISTORICAL \
• MUSEUM 2 4 \ Q
Dayton 5 �.
41,
a� � � � 1-:� � a ram. r , ,• M- �/ � �' � t
'a r
Figure 3• Downtown Context Diagram for 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor
Packet Pg. 73
9.1.a
VISION GOALS
(From City of Edmonds Website)
The purpose of the project is to make this important pedestrian connection
between Downtown Edmonds' premier arts/culture venue and the restaurant,
shops and services of Main Street and heart of Downtown Edmonds a safer,
more welcoming, more inviting, and more interesting pedestrian experience,
maximizing connectivity between Downtown and ECA.
Another important purpose is to create a special linear venue that could
accommodate celebrations, events, art, and performance - all resulting in
4th Avenue becoming a destination unto itself, only steps away from the
waterfront and the new Civic Park.
Figure 4: 4th Avenue looking north east between Bell Street and Daley Street
8
0
•L
L
0
U
L
3
a.+
U
d
c
d
a
t
v
The Luminous Forest on 4th Avenue by lole Alessandrini
Figure 5: Examples of artistic expression possible along the cultural corridor
Packet Pg. 74
9.1.a
REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Roadway Pavement Condition
The existing roadway pavement along 4th Avenue is asphalt pavement
and is in poor condition. There is visual presence of surface cracking, loss
of HMA binder, spalling, separation from curb and gutter, and past surface
crack sealant down the corridor.
Sidewalk Pavement Conditions, and American Disability Act
(ADA)
The existing sidewalk pavement along 4th Avenue is aging cement concrete
that is in poor condition, with many panels misaligned with vertical
discontinuities making them non-ADA compliant. Most driveway entrances
have severe cracking and non-ADA compliant cross slopes through the
sidewalk. There is noticeable cracking and settling around the existing
water meter service boxes in the sidewalk panels throughout the project
limits.
The existing sidewalk width varies from 5 to 7 feet along the corridor. The
five feet wide sections that have street sign and lighting poles next to the
curb reduce the usable access route to less than five feet continuous width.
Existing sidewalk usable space is additionally narrowed by the parked
cars along the curb and overgrown hedges and fencing along the back of
existing sidewalk.
A majority of the ADA ramps and crosswalks at the intersections of 4th and
Main Street, Bell Street, Daley Street and near 3rd Avenue N, do not meet
ADA standards.
Figure 6: Views of 4th Avenue
Packet Pg. 75
9.1.a
REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Corridor Utilities
Water
Water — Per the City of Edmonds 2016 Comprehensive Water System
Plan — there is a schedule to replace the existing 8" diameter water main
along 4th Avenue. As of now, the City plans to replace the old water main
under the Annual Water Main Replacement. There is no exact schedule
for this replacement, but it is on the Water Main Improvement Project
list. The selection and implementation of the water main projects on this
comprehensive list tend to be accomplished by utilizing both the priority
ranking information in the comprehensive plan and other information to
ensure projects representing the greatest need are completed first. This
approach provides the City with the flexibility to coordinate water main
projects with other projects planned for the same area to capture efficiencies
and reduce project costs.
Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary sewer lines cross 4th Avenue N at the intersections of Edmonds
Street and Daley Street. During the 10% Design kick-off there was no
discussion about need to replace these lines. Final design will confirm any
replacement needs and adjust any sewer lids to final grade.
Gas
Natural Gas lines cross at Edmonds Street. Coordination with Puget Sound
Energy during final design will review any upgrades or conflicts.
Franchise Utilities
No Franchise utilities were identified by the survey. Coordination with
Franchise Utilities will occur during final design.
LC
Am
Figure'7: Existing utilities along 4th Avenue N
Packet Pg. 76
9.1.a
REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Street Illumination
Street lighting levels vary along the corridor. At Main St. the downtown
decorative pedestrian scale pole is located on each corner. The remainder
of the corridor has inconsistently placed Cobra head fixtures attached
to wood utility poles. There are four cobra head lights between Main St.
and Bell St., one light is located at Edmonds St., one light at Daley St.
and between Daley St. and 3rd Ave., there are two lights along the ECA.
Final design will need to determine the appropriate lighting levels for the
corridor.
The 2020 Plan and review from the Fire Marshall
and Emergency Response
The 2020 Plan provided a preference survey for selecting a street cross
section that included sidewalk widths, for the section between Main St.
and Edmonds St. The preferred option for future schematic design was the
One-way Two -Parking Alternative with a focus on enhancing the pedestrian
realm. This alternative has 8' sidewalks with 4' planters along the back of
curb.
The selected alternative identified that the sidewalk/planter zone would
include new seating, add colorful art, and unique lighting to the street. It
would also be available to host occasional exhibits, sculptures, and events.
This option maintained parking, while enhancing walkability. The proposed
cross section is widened towards private property, but is located within the
existing right of way.
To achieve the combined 1 2' sidewalk/planter width, the sidewalks would
need to widen outwards into the existing right of way. This right of way
is currently landscaped as front yards and includes fences, hedges, stairs
and other elements. Because of the range of impacts to front yards this
study reviewed narrowing the roadway in order to reduce the widening.
A meeting with the Fire Marshall determined that the street cannot be
narrowed because of emergency access requirements, that have a 20' wide
minimum. Hence, the 30' existing curb to curb width from Bell Street to 3rd
Avenue must be maintained in order to preserve on street parking.
Figure 8: 4th Avenue looking southwest towards Main Street
Figure: 8
Packet Pg. 77
9.1.a
REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing Sidewalk Widths
EXISTING SIDEWALK
SIDEWALK WIDTH
NOTES
(not including curb)
Main Street to Bell Street
6.5'
Bell Street to Edmonds Street
6'
All these private owned parcels have front yards be -
to Daley Street
7.5' + at Church parcel
hind the existing sidewalk that are located within the
ROW. The chart below locates the property lines
Daley Street to 3rd Avenue
East side: 5'
Recent development on the west side installed new
West side: Varies 5.5' to 8'
wider sidewalks
Private Property Lines and Right of Way (ROW)
CROSS STREET TO
CROSS STREET
LOCATION OF PRIVATE
PROPERTY LINES
(related to existing sidewalks)
PUBLIC
RIGHT OF WAY
WIDTH
NOTES
Main Street to Bell
Property lines location:
50 feet wide
All these privately owned par -
Street /
along existing back of sidewalk /
cels have front yards behind
Daley Street to 3rd
Property lines random because
the existing sidewalk that are
Avenue
roadway is not centered
located within the ROW.
Bell Street to Daley
Property lines location:
60 feet wide
Street
Approximately 8.5 feet from back
of existing sidewalk on both sides.
One parcel the property line is
7.5 feet from back of existing
sidewalk
12
Packet Pg. 78
9.1.a
REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Traffic Circulation and On -Street Parking
The existing corridor, from Main Street to 3rd Avenue N, is two-way traffic
with on street parallel parking on both sides of the street. From Main Street
to Bell the travel lanes and parallel parking locations are channelized.
From Bell Street to 3rd Avenue N. the travel lanes and on street parking are
not channelized (not pavement striping).
In 2009, the initial plan emphasized the corridor as a curbless linear plaza
with decorative pavement. It reduced on street parking, and proposed
operating it a one-way street northbound. This idea was reviewed by
city staff with the three following conclusions. First, making it look like a
pedestrian plaza/woonerf using pavers the entire length, was deemed to
be too expensive to build and was removed from consideration. Second,
the idea of reducing substantial amounts of on -street parking was deemed
problematic because parking is needed in downtown during peak events
and weekends. Third, the change from two-way to one-way operation
northbound was left as an approved consideration. The idea of one-way
traffic was reexamined in the 2020 Outreach survey. The survey supported
the idea of one-way operation northbound, from Main Street to Edmonds
Street.
Because the curb location will not change along the corridor, except at
intersections for curb bulbs, and the corridor has a very low average
daily traffic count (ADT), this study did not formally address whether the
corridor should have a one-way or two-way operation. If it remains as
two-way, there is a natural traffic calming element between Bell Street and
3rd Avenue because the on -street parking, makes passing traffic relatively
tight (depending on the size of vehicle parked on either side of the street
the drivable space can be —16' to 20'. It is relatively difficult to speed
down the corridor because the distance between passing cars is very tight,
which at times can force one driver to wait in a gap until the other car
passes. If the road becomes one way, the travel lane will be approximately
16' wide, allowing a very wide travel lane that could encourage faster
vehicular speeds or increase cut thru traffic. Hence, the idea of any change
to one-way (along all or any segment of the corridor) can be reviewed
with additional traffic analysis during final design. The decision should be
partially considered on the goal of making the corridor more pedestrian
safe and aesthetically pleasing. Please note, one-way operation will have
visual impacts to the corridor because of the required signage needed at
each block for traffic safety, including directional arrow signs on the cross
streets, do not enter signs on each block, painted directional arrows on the
pavement and any other additional signs that meet both City and Federal
standards (Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices MUTCD).
Figure 9: 4th Avenue looking northeast towards the ECA
1
Packet Pg. 79
9.1.a
REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Vehicular Access to Properties
All properties have vehicular access. Approximately 15 driveways access
properties along 4th Avenue accessing commercial and residential
properties. In addition, approximately 28 driveways access from alleys
located behind properties on both sides of the street.
Existing driveways along 4th would be replaced in kind, or updated to city
standards where appropriate, in coordination with property owners.
Parcels and Existing Land Use Along the Corridor
There are 40 parcels along the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor, between
a half -block south of Main St. to Third Ave. They represent a mixture
of commercial, public, rental and residential owner -occupied properties,
with about half currently single-family residential and the other half as
commercial, church, multifamily and public properties.
3RD AVE N
sGt
o a'• w
Figure 10: Parcel map provided by City of Edmonds GIS Map
14
GENERAL NUMBER OF NOTES
TYPE OF USE PARCELS (Information may not be accurate)
Commercial
12
Unknown current number of businesses
along corridor
Church
2
First baptist Church Edmonds
Public
2
Edmonds Public Facility District/ECA,
a small parcel across from ECA along 4th
Rental LLC
3
Unknown current number of dwelling units
Multifamily
Residential
SF Residential
21
Owner or Rental
Figure 11: Two existing driveways along 4th Ave.
Packet Pg. 80
9.1.a
REVIEW OF EXISTING CONDITIONS
Edmond Center for the Arts Frontage Idea
The Edmonds Public Facilties District (EPFD), who owns and operates
Edmond's Center for the Arts (ECA), and property, is a key stakeholder in this
project. The EPFD/ECA frontage along 4th Avenue has untapped potential
to create a much stronger destination for its patrons and local residents. The
main doors, that ECA patrons access for events and performances, faces
onto 4th Avenue and the existing space is currently underutilized.
The Project Team interviewed the former Executive Director of the ECA, to
record any thoughts of what might enhance the frontage along 4th Avenue.
A range of ideas were expressed, and these were distilled into four design
ideas identified in the plan view on this page.
1. Provide additional terrace space, between the two main entrances, that
allow ECA patrons to congregate more comfortably outside before and
after each event. Note: the existing lawn area is underutilized by patrons
and the existing sidewalk between the two main doorways is too narrow to
accommodate larger groups of patrons.
2. Provide a new plaza space midway in elevation between 4th Avenue and the
ECA entrances. Place a center staircase in the middle to access the entrance
terrace and new plaza space. ADA access can be provided north and south
along the perimeter sidewalk. Landscape can be located along the perimeter
planter areas. Stairs can be added along the 4th Avenue sidewalk in a
couple of locations.
3. Provide a "Busker" musician stage area. This will be a focal area in the new
plaza that patrons can meet with friends before and after events and allow
for scheduled busker musicians to play.
4. Provide a large iconic art scultpure representative of both the ECA & the
Edmonds Creative District branding, reflecting local culture and history. The
size should be—20-30' tall, colorful and visible from Main Street looking
down the middle of street. The image has to be highly evocative and create
a sense of place. It should entice visitors to take pictures in front of it, for
example the Cloud Gate/"Bean", in downtown Chicago.
• -.A
Figure 12: ECA frontage idea perspective
'expand,
!�\ entrancE
seat
steps
-, addition R '
sculptural r
NORTH` t
Figure 13: ECA frontage idea plan view
Packet Pg. 81
9.1.a
COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
Overview
Building upon the 2020 Conceptual Design, the Project Team representing
the City, Edmonds Public Facilities District (PFD) and Edmonds Center for
the Arts (ECA), and KPG Psomas, developed a public engagement plan to
guide the community and stakeholder outreach process.
The Project Team held several stakeholder advisory meetings to clarify
design ideas with Public Works, Utilities, Fire Marshall, Community Services
& Economic Development, EPFD and ECA. These meetings refined the
corridor plan to ensure that the unresolved design considerations from the
2020 plan were reviewed and resolved before soliciting public feedback.
The Project Team launched a public engagement campaign starting at
the end of June to mid -July 2023, which included email notifications, City
media press releases, updates to the City's project website, and three
information sandwich boards located outdoors in downtown Edmonds.
Various outreach methods were used to encourage in -person feedback at
the Edmonds Museum Summer Market (I2:00pm-2:00pm) and Community
Figure 14: Community outreach at the Summer Market
16
Figure 15: Community outreach at the ECA.
L.Packel Pg. 82
9.1.a
COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
Overview (cont'd)
Open House held at the ECA (4:00pm-6:00pm) which were both held on
Saturday, July 29, 2023. About 30 visitors attended each event.
The morning event at the Summer Market used a venue -provided pop-up
tent on 5th Avenue near City Hall. This outreach was more informal since
it was a part of the Summer Market. Exhibits included an illustrative scroll
on a table and several presentation boards on easels around the tent's
perimeter as well as a button -making station where participants made their
own custom project buttons.
The afternoon Community Open House was held outdoors in front of the
Edmonds Center for the Arts. A presentation was given by Todd Tatum and
Paul Fuesel, followed by a question/answer session and then one-on-one
conversations for feedback. Many attendees at this event reside and/or
work along the corridor.
To improve decision -making and help ensure that the final outcome of the
10% plan reflects the needs of the community, the Project Team circled
back with another outreach event to confirm stakeholder input. Weeks
prior to this second touchpoint, the City advertised the upcoming event by
distributing letters to each resident/business along the project corridor, as
well as updating the posted sandwich boards in Downtown Edmonds. The
`Cookies at the Corridor' was held on Saturday, August 26th, at 3:00pm-
5:00pm at the Edmonds Center for the Arts. The event started with a short
presentation by Todd Tatum and Paul Fuesel for those gathered in the
ECA lobby. Following the Q/A session participants walked along project
corridor for more discussion. The event finished back in the ECA lobby.
Throughout the event, representatives from the City, EPFD, ECA, and KPG
Psomas shared project ideas, answered questions and comments that helped
further refine the 10% plan presented in this document.
Figure 16: Community outreach along 4th Avenue
Packet Pg. 83
9.1.a
COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH
Notifications and Publications
Several a -news articles from My Edmonds News came out prior to and
following the outreach events. Public commentaries of the following articles
below can be found in the appendix.
• Reminder: Community open house Community open house July for 4th Avenue Cultural
4th Avenue Cultural
Corridor Project Project - MyEdmonds News
• Residents get a closer look at 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor design get a closer look at 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor design - My
Edmonds News
The City's project webpagee (https://www.edmondswa.gov/doing—business/
edmonds_creative_district/4th_ avenue _ cultural_ corridor ) was updated
with the outreach exhibit materials and a link to the public online survey
was provided for information gathering. Presentation exhibits from the
outreaches are located in Appendix A.
Immediately after the Community Open House, the Project Team launched
the online survey which ran until the end of September 2023. Presentation
exhibits were left in the Edmonds Center for
TH AVE CULTURAL the Arts lobby for patrons and visitors to
- CORRIDOR
review and a QR code linked to the online
PUBLIC OUTREACH
survey also prompted the public for feedback.
7 / The Stakeholder Outreach & Feedback Log
q� ,f (see Appendix B) catalogs participant user
-J im
information, quoted feedback from the public
' LEI
•'it� CAN CODE TO outreach from all three public engagement
•,'
�• SHARE FEEDBACK. ' .V events, and online survey feedback received
throughout the duration of the project.
18
4- CULTURAL
TH AVE CORRIDOR
a-
il Cearq about what's haaargigq gyour rorgrqugityl
• dsk questiogs aqd share your ideas!
The City wdl present proposed d ,gn impowmeRs far Ath A.mve
bar,— Edrnonda Str W end 3rd A— N Your input n .dad to
prehmemry desgn layout to he —.ed fprwmd ,mo
plan for tM 4th Av CA" Projeet
COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE
Edmpda Canter far the Arts (ECA) • ¢
410 4' Av-r.ue N. Ed—ds, WA 98020
Saturday, July 29, 2023 between 4Pm W epr-,
COORUea ON THE CORRIDOR
Meet a+ th- ECA 3pm I Pre•e "'t 320pm
.,'-,-4th A— rl Wrap up 430-5pin
Saturday, Auguat 26, 2023 .,m to 5pm \•
For additional q.ezt5onz. comments or translation services.
Figure 17: Community Outreach materials
Packet Pg. 84
I.2'
• Many residents are generally interested in the project. Many
believe this is a placemaking project which will add to the
cohesiveness of downtown.
• The project is for both visitors and local users and enhances the
economic livelihood of downtown, because of ECA patrons.
• The presentation materials were well received by members at the
EPFD board meeting.
• Heard excitement for the ECA and it's connection to downtown.
• It was surprising that people don't know that much about ECA.
• The plaza concept at the ECA was a dynamite idea and the young
folks were eager and excited about the street project, while being
mindful of future zoning as well.
• Many visitors and residents appreciated the efforts to create a
more walkable downtown. There were expressed needs for more
trees and art to be integrated along the corridor.
0 Preserving the character of the neighborhood is very important.
9.1.a
UPDATED 10% PLAN PROJECT ELEMENTS
Based upon review of the 2020 plan and current stakeholder input, the 4th
Avenue Cultural Corridor plan has been updated and refined to 10% as
follows:
Roadway and Raised Intersection:
The corridor plan layout is a combination of raised curbless intersections
with curbed sections along each block. The raised curbless intersections
allow for ease of ADA access and create a stronger visual and accessible
pedestrian environment, as well as provide a perceived traffic calming
element. The curb sections are located where parallel parking occurs, with
the curb providing an edge to park along.
Street Width:
The existing street width, curb -to -curb, along each block will remain, due
to emergency access requirements that will allow for retaining parallel
parking along both sides of the street. At the raised intersections there will
be curb bulbs that will provide the minimum 20' roadway width required
by the Fire Marshal.
Parking:
Existing parallel parking is retained along the corridor. It will be slightly
reduced wherever short mid -block curb bulbs are located for pedestrian
amenities. These locations will be confirmed and refined during final design.
At intersections, the curb bulbs will be located at the corners where parking
is currently prohibited.
Two -Way vs One -Way Operation:
The 2009 and 2020 plans proposed one-way northbound operation.
Because the street width and on street parking is not changing, the ability
to operate the corridor for either two-way or one-way operation is viable.
The final decision for operating two-way or one-way should be verified by
a transportation study that can be completed during final design.
20
3
Figure 19: Raised Intersection examples in Eastsound (above) and Renton (below)
Packet Pg. 86
9.1.a
UPDATED 10% PLAN PROJECT ELEMENTS
Wider Sidewalks:
The 10% Corridor plan reflects wider sidewalks within the existing public
right of way (ROW). Between Bell Street and Daley Street, the existing
6' wide sidewalk is proposed to be widened 1.5'. This widening will occur
within the ROW, but is currently being used by private properties as their
front yards, with a wide variety of landscape and physical elements, such
as fences. Any features removed are recommended for restoration behind
the new sidewalk width. Between Daley Street and 3rd Avenue, on the east
side, the sidewalk is proposed to be widened 1.5' along the ECA frontage,
with no additional widening up to 3rd Street, except for curb bulbs at the
existing crosswalk. The west side has been partially widened near Daley
Street. No more widening is proposed on the remainder of the west side.
The wider sidewalk provides for the required ADA width by the proposed
decorative street light poles that will be set back from the face of curb.
Between Main Street and Bell Street, the existing back of sidewalk is
located at the ROW. The sidewalk is not proposed to be widened.
Crosswalks:
At raised intersections, the proposed crosswalks will be flush with the
sidewalks. Detectable warning surface (truncated domes) are installed
at the street edge to delineate crossings for pedestrians with impaired
vision. These elevated crosswalks make the pedestrian more prominent in
the driver's field of vision. The approach ramps at the roadway intersection
acts as a traffic calming effect as vehicles may reduce speeds and improve
motorist yielding.
A 4W
qw$qw
Figure 20: Raised Intersection examples in Olympia (above) and Burien (below)
Packet Pg. 87
9.1.a
UPDATED 10% PLAN PROJECT ELEMENTS
Utilities:
A range of new, modified and preserved utilities are proposed as follows:
Provide new decorative pedestrian scale Illumination system along
each block. Identify during final design the lighting levels that best suit
the Cultural Corridor and follow city standards for intersection lighting.
Note selected light fixtures should shield light into adjacent residential
properties.
Modifying the existing storm water conveyance system for the raised
intersections and curb bulbs may require complete rebuild of the system.
Flow control and water quality requirements per the City of Edmonds
2022 stormwater manual and adopted DOE Stormwater Manual for
Western Washington will also be reviewed and implemented into final
design. Detention may be required.
Provide new water main, services, and hydrants at the direction of the
City Water Department and their Comprehensive Plan.
There will be adjustment of franchise utilities and sewer manhole lids,
as identified and coordinated during final design.
Pedestrian Streetscape Amenities:
A goal of the project is to provide an historic, cultural and artistic streetscape
along 4th to encourage pedestrian activity along the corridor between
downtown businesses and the ECA. The amenities are shown in the 10%
Illustrative Plan on the following pages, as colorful streetscape areas and
represent:
• Decorative street furniture
• Decorative pavement
• Decorative street illumination
• Public art with interpretive cultural and historic elements
• Tree and landscape areas
22
These elements can be expressed through graphics, photos, mosaics,
sculpture and embedded in pavement, stand vertically, and be attached to
poles. The selection of specific cultural corridor elements public art pieces
will be identified during final design.
The Luminous Forest by lole Alessandrini
Figure 21: Examples of artistic expression possible along the Cultural Corridor
UPDATED 10% PLAN PROJECT ELEMENTS
-w
- �1� � 91 , ti ►L
MEMO
Figure 22: Sketch of Pedestrian Amenities at Raised Intersections
Large Curb Bulb "Parklet" at NE corner of Edmonds St Intersection:
Continuing on the intial vision of the Cultural Corridor, the NE corner at
4th Avenue, Edmonds Street, and Sprague Street will be enhanced with a
large curb bulb "parklet" with landscape and pedestrian amenities as an
informal public open space.
�+
-
Figure 23: Illustrative Plan of Raised intersection and large curb bulb "parklet"
on Sprague Street
2
Packet Pg. 89
9.1.a
UPDATED 10% PLAN PROJECT ELEMENTS
ECA Frontage Idea
The following concept plan iIlustratesthe potential enhancements
for creating a stronger destination for the ECA for its patrons,
visitors, and residents. It consists of 4 ideas:
1. Provide additional terrace space, between the two main
entrances, that allow ECA patrons to congregate more
comfortably outside, before and after each event.
2. Provide a new plaza space midway in elevation between
4th Avenue and the ECA entrances. Place a center staircase
in the middle to access the entrance terrace and new plaza
space. ADA access can be provided north and south along
the perimeter sidewalk. Landscape can be located along
the plaza perimeter. Stairs can be added along the 4th
Avenue sidewalk in a couple of locations.
3. Provide a small musician stage area for "busker' type
performances. This will be a focal area in the new plaza
that patrons can meet with friends before and after events
and allow for musicians to play.
4. Provide a large iconic art sculpture representative of
both the ECA & the Edmonds Creative District branding,
reflecting local culture and history. The size should be —20-
30' tall, colorful and visible from Main Street looking down
the middle of street. The image has to be highly evocative
and create a sense of place. It should entice visitors to take
pictures in front of it.
This concept is not included in the cost estimate for the
Implementation Plan, as it is not a part of the proposed 4th
Avenue Improvements. In addition the concept has not been
formally considered by the EPFD.
24
Figure 24: ECA frontage idea plan view
L
0
�L
L
0
U
3
U
d
a
c
d
a
t
v
Packet Pg. 90
9.1.a
UPDATED 10% PLAN PROJECT ELEMENTS
Activation and Closure of Street for Programmed Events
As described in the 2020 plan, programmed events can focus on arts,
commerce and neighborhood themes. The raised intersections are designed
to be used as "bookends" for road closure that can be scaled to the size
of the event. For example, if the event is related to performing arts, the
section between 3rd Avenue and Daley Street can be closed. If the activity
is related to commerce, the section between Main Street and Bell Street can
be closed. If the event is larger multiple blocks can be closed.
In addition there are two other spaces along the Cultural Corridor, the
ECA frontage and the large curb bulb "parklet", that can be programmed
formally or activated informally. The plaza idea in front of the ECA can
provide a space for smaller performances, like Buskers (musicians) that can
be managed by the EPFD & ECA. The large curb bulb "parklet" on Sprague
Street at Edmonds Street can also be used as an informal place to meet or
gather, for informal or planned activities.
10% Illustrative Plan
The following 10% Illustrative Plan, on the next pages, conveys the
proposed placemaking design of the Cultural Corridor. It consists of the
four raised intersections at Main St., Bell St., Edmonds St., and Daley St. that
include decorative pavement treatments and curb bulbs for integrated art
representing the culture and history of Edmonds. In between the intersectons,
also the sidewalk is widened between Bell St. and Daley St. with mid -block
curb bulbs for additional artistic expressions and pedestrian amenities,
including street lighting. A large curb bulb parklet is located on Sprague
St. From Daley St. to 3rd Ave. the sidewalk is widened along the ECA, and
shows the plaza enhancement idea at existing lawn area.
Figure 25: Example Programmed Events along the Cultural Corridor
2
Packet Pg. 91
26
10% ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN LAYOUT L
•L
L
0
U
L
U
d
_
d
a
_
0
.N
d
0
w
_
m
L
a
0
r
L
0
�L
L
O
(U
_
a�
Figure: 8 E
t
v
c�
w
Q
Packet Pg. 92
Z;
�
ILL
J. 2
4TH AVE N
LL
tzi�, -7
Li
L-JL
.7 V.
L
--- t7� ,
LL—
(,p4
NOT TO SCALE NORTH
2
L)
,,- 7t
2
Packet Pg. 93
9.1.a
10% ROADWAY PLAN LAYOUT
28
10% Roadway Plan
The 10% Roadway Plan on the following pages, illustrates the engineering
layout of the roadway, intersections, and sidewalks. It shows the geometric
layout of the curbline and raised intersections with crosswalks. It also shows
where mid -block curb bulbs could be introduced. Please note the plan does
not show any channelization for one-way operation or on -street parking or
centerlines that exist between Main Street and Bell Street. Also note that the
layout can accommodate either one-way or two-way vehicle travel.
The proposed extents of improvements along each cross street is also shown.
These extents contain the raised intersection ramps and curb bulbs. These
extents may be longer, if required or desired for the existing utilities that
are located along each cross street. This can be reviewed and refined
during final design.
Utilities such as street illumination and stormwater system modifications are
not shown, as they will be included in future final design plans.
Packet Pg. 94
10% ROADWAY PLAN LAYOUT
U
NORTH
1 " = 60'
On 8.5" x 11 " Paper-
v M.
k . !► <
,,�, C
;� /
lop, LIM
pap Zs dw
'.ZS Qyc
Figure: 9
Packet Pg. 95
30
10% ROADWAY PLAN LAYOUT
-6
nm.w
---Y------tt------#---- --�
40 Y iMOp k( pyp �a
—
+�.
r tt
■R
--------------- —
/HG0 fIMO
_ _ _�—tt-----
1HQD
------
SL f011D
low 1
----
..
• r wY >. • �w r
.,T e ;I
r ■ ■
..•.•; �d I
r r ■ • ■ r
- -I
I fit- ' I
Y r
AS
I
v
•
der
I I I
I
I -
I
I �
-.•.�e�-� �
V 1l
- Tv^'
I
Figure: 10
Packet Pg. 96
10% ROADWAY PLAN LAYOUT
An
Ll
erao, Fran Hao `— erm srao � aro _ i "°° 'w°
L------------------------ --------------------- L----- ---- — --- i \
r. \
I I I I • J � I \�'
I I I -- ----
I
!""L = I�-
----J�----L--------J--- L-----------
i
Figure: 11
NORTH
1 ' = 60'
On 8.5" x 11" Paper
Packet Pg. 97
9.1.a
COST ESTIMATES
32
The following project cost estimate is a high-level estimate reflecting the
1 0% Illustrative Plan, and 1 0% Engineering Layout Plan created during this
study.
This estimate reflects estimated quantities and current comparable unit
costs for 2023, including a 20% contingency factor. It also includes a
3-year inflation cost factor, assuming that final design will proceed, and
that construction will begin in 2026. It also includes City Administration and
Construction Management (CM) and Inspection.
The estimate does not include:
The cost for Final Design (PS&E) and Permitting. The estimated cost is
1 5% of total estimated construction cost.
All the art, historic, cultural elements that will need to be designed by
artists and related designers.
ECA frontage plaza idea illustrated in this report.
Packet Pg. 98
9.1.a
COST ESTIMATES
4TH AVE CULTURAL CORRIDOR PROJECT COST ESTIMATE KPG
(following City of Edmonds Capital Projects policy)
from Main St. to 3rd Ave. S.
1.8.2024
No.
Spec No.
Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total
ROADWAY
IMPROVEMENTS
1
1-04
Minor Change, Unexpected Site Changes
1
EST
$ 25,000.00
$ 25,000.00
2
1-05
Roadway Surveying(2% of Const. Subtotal)
1
LS
$ 79,990.00
$ 79,990.00
3
1-05
ADA Features Surveying
1
LS
$ 30,000.00
$ 30,000.00
4
1-09
Mobilization (8% of Const. Subtotal)
1
LS
$ 319,960.00
$ 319,960.00
5
1-10
Project Temporary Traffic Control (10% of Const. Subtotal)
1
LS
$ 399,950.00
$ 399,950.00
6
1-10
Pedestrian Traffic Control
1
LS
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
7
2-01
Clearing and Grubbing
1
LS
$ 15,000.00
$ 15,000.00
8
2-02
Removal of Structure & Obstruction (see notes)
1
LS
$ 25,000.00
$ 25,000.00
9
1 2-03
lEarthwork - Low Grading (1-2' Grading)
71040
SF
$ 1.00
$ 71,040.00
10
2-03
lRoadway Excavation Removals (pavement, sidewalk, curb, etc.)
1860
CY
$ 50.00
$ 93,000.00
11
4-04
Gravel Borrow
90
TON
$ 50.00
$ 4,500.00
12
4-04
Crushed Surfacing Top Course
1710
TON
$ 50.00
$ 85,500.00
13
5-04
Planing Bituminous Pavement
2740
SY
$ 8.00
$ 21,920.00
14
5-04
HMA Cl. 1/2" PG 5SH-22
1140
TON
$ 200.00
$ 228,000.00
15
5-05
Cement Conic. Pavement RI Ramps (see notes)
649
SY
$ 150.00
$ 97,350.00
16
5-05
Decorative Cement Conc Paver RI X-walks
516
SY
$ 235.00
$ 121,260.00
17
5-05
Decorative Cement Conc Paver RI Table Top
490
SY
$ 235.00
$ 115,150.00
18
5-05
Decorative Cement Conc Paver RI Rat Slab
1005
SY
$ 35.00
$ 35,175.00
19
6-13
Modular Block Walls
630
SF
$ 80.00
$ 50,400.00
20
6-13
Structural Walls
1050
SF
$ 100.00
$ 105,000.00
21
7-17
Adjust Sewer Utilities
1
LS
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
22
8-01
Erosion Control and Water Pollution Prevention
1
LS
$ 25,000.00
$ 25,000.00
23
8-02
Roadway Planters (see notes)
3100
SF
$ 35.00
$ 108,500.00
24
8-02
Property Restoration (see notes)
1
LS
$ 300,000.00
$ 300,000.00
25
8-04
Cement Conic. Traffic Curb and Gutter
4140
LF
$ 45.00
$ 186,300.00
26
8-09
Cement Conc. Driveway Entrance
260
SY
$ 150.00
$ 39,000.00
27
8-14
Standard Cement Conc. Sidewalk
3000
SY
$ 75.00
$ 225,000.00
28
8-14
Decorative Cement Conc. Paver Sidewalk
590
SY
$ 225.00
$ 132,750.00
29
8-14
Cement Conc. Curb Ramp
4
EA
$ 10,000.00
$ 40,000.00
30
8-21
Permanent Signing
1
LS
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
31
8-22
Pavement Markings
1
LS
$ 4,600.00
$ 4,600.00
32
8-30
Art Feature Foundations
1
LS
$ 50,000.00
$ 50,000.00
33
8-31
Site Furnishings
1
LS
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
34
8-33
Franchise Utilities (Adjustments & Relomtions)(see notes)
1
LS
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
Subtotal $ 3,124,345.00
STORMWATER SYSTEM
35
7-04
Drainage System - Modified (see notes)
500
LF
$ 1,300.00
$ 650,000.00
36
7-05
Drainage System - Flow Control
1
LS
$ 150,000.00
$ 150,000.00
37
1 7-05
1 Drainage System - Water Quality
1
LS
$ 150,000.00
$ 150,000.00
Subtotal $ 950,000.00
ILLUMINATION SYSTEM
38
8-20
Remove and Reset Luminous Forest, Complete
1
LS
$ 50,000.00
$ 50,000.00
39
1 8-20
IDecorative Pedestrian Illumination, Complete (see notes)
1500
LF
$ 500.00
$ 750,000.00
Subtotal
$ 800,000.00
Construction SubTotal
Contingency (20%)
$ 4,874,345.00
$ 974,870.00
2023 Total Estimated Construction Cost
1 $ 5,849,215.00
Figure: 12
No.
Spec No.
Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total
18 % of Construction Cost for Design/Permitting/Staff Coordination & City of Edmonds Project Management
$ 877,382.10
30 % Design Contingency (30% of the 18 % Design/Permitting/Staff Coord & PM
$ 263,214.63
10% of Construction Costs for ROW/Easement/Encroachment Coordination/Resolution with Property Owners
$ 487,434.50
18% of Construction Costs for Construction Management
$ 877,382.10
10% of Construction Costs for Management Reserve
$ 487,434.50
5% of Construction Costs for Inflation per Year - 2026
$ 921,982.51
2026 Total Estimated Project Cost
$ 9,764,045.34
NOTES
1) Unit prices are based on 2023 bid tabs and prior estimates.
2) Project estimate based on City preferred concept as laid out by KPG Psomas and described in the Sept 23' Funding and Implementation
Plan.
3) BI# 8 - includes trees, signs, fencing, etc.
4) BI# 9 - "Earthwork Low" assumed to be everything in the existing roadway footprint.
5) BI# 15 - includes escalations for ramp handwork and tactile strips at raised crossings.
6) BI# 21 - Assume Sewer utilities in good condition and to remain. Improvements include adjustments to grade.
7) BI# 23 - Roadway Planters cost includes street trees, shrubs and irrigation.
8) BI# 24 - Property restoration includes shrubs, steps/walkway, fences, etc.
9) BI# 34 - Franchise Utilities - assumes only on east west crossings and none along 4th Avenue. This is for minor adjustments.
10) BI# 35 - Drainage System - assumes curb line remains in place. Stone modifications at curb bulbs and raised intersections - approx
4701f.
11) BI# 39 - Decorative Ped. IIIum. - for roadway illumation with no tall roadway scaled fixtures.
12) Assume no permanent ROW acquisitions are required. Temporary construction easements possible depending funding. Otherwise ROE
by owner signatures only.
13) Assume no aerial utility undergrounding at cross streets. Carried costs for minor adjustment of any peds or vaults in BI#34.
14) Water Main Replacement not included in Project Cost. It was not included in percentage of overhead items TC, Survey, and Mobilization
see below
WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT
40
7-04
Upgrade 8" to 12" DI Main (includes spot removals of existing)
2000
LF
$ 700.00
$ 1,400,000.00
41
7-OS
Services (verify size and count)
36
EA
$ 2,500.00
$ 90,000.00
42
7-05
Hydrants and Apparatuses
1
LS
$ 50,000.00
$ 50,000.00
Construction
SubTotal
$ 1,540,000.00
Contingency (20%)
S 308,000.00
Sales Tax 10.6%
S 195,888.00
Subtotal
$ 2,043,888.00
Packet Pg. 99
9.1.a
FUNDING AND CRITERIA FOR GRANTS
The funding for the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor is expected to require
both city funding and non -city grants. Grant funding is based upon criteria
from a wide range of grant funding agencies.
The existing corridor has both infrastructure maintenance issues as well
as pedestrian safety and access issues. Infrastructure includes future
replacement of the water lines and services to properties. Pedestrian
safety and access include a lack of ADA facilities, particularly ADA ramps,
as well as safety given there have been 2 reported vehicle -pedestrian
crashes along the corridor in the last five years.
The goal of enhancing the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to create a more
inviting pedestrian experience, can build upon the following:
City Planned Improvements
Water line replacement:
The City has identified the need to replace water lines, which include
service connections and possibly fire hydrants with removal and patching
of roadway trenching and concrete sidewalk removal. There is no schedule
for this work.
Roadway HMA pavement:
The roadway pavement is in need of repair. There is no schedule for this
work to be completed.
34
Potential Grants Criteria
Safety Grants Criteria:
• 2 pedestrian -vehicle crashes in the last five years.
• Pedestrian Improvements with ADA access on 4th Avenue at the
intersections of Main St, Bell St, Edmonds St, Daley St and 3rd Avenue.
• No defined crosswalks at the intersections of Edmonds St and Daley St.
• With the inclusion of decorative streetlights in sidewalks, and the need
to meet PAR, the sidewalks will need to be wider.
• Provide raised intersections to eliminate the need for ADA ramps and
landings, which will provide more space next to adjacent private
property.
• Raised intersections with curb bulbs, and mid -block curb bulbs will also
provide traffic calming with grade change at intersections and visual
cue that intersections are pedestrian oriented places.
• New Street illumination will improve vehicle and pedestrian visibility.
• 4th Avenue is local street and not a functionally classified street so it will
not be eligible for some grant programs.
Pedestrian Grants Criteria:
Walkability, ADA, shorter crosswalks, more inviting with placemaking
design.
Connecting two important places within downtown; Edmonds Center for
the Arts and Main Street shops and businesses.
Arts Grants Criteria:
• Public art expressing Edmond's cultural and historical roots.
Packet Pg. 100
9.1.a
0
L
Potential Grants 0
M
Transportation Improvement Board - http://www.tib.wa.gov/grants/grants.cfm: 2
U
• TIB Urban Arterial Program UAP- safety
o The Urban Arterial Program funds projects in one of the following bands: Safety, Commercial Q
Growth and Development, Mobility, and Physical Condition. t
.r
o Street Lighting
o ADA '- r
o Safety o
• TIB Complete Streets:
• WSDOT Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Grants:
• WA State Certified Creative District Capital Project Program
• ArtWA Grants to Organizations GTO Grants
• WA State Department of Ecology DOE stormwater treatment huge incentive
• Clean Water Grants (High Priority)https://public.tableau.com/views/WaterQuality
CombinedFundingProgramFinalSFY 1 80fferList/2018FinalList?:embed=y&:display_
count=yes&:showVizHome=no
3
Packet Pg.:,
g. 101
9.2
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Code Amendment
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Preparer: Michael Clugston
Background/History
Critical aquifer recharge areas (CARAs) are established to protect groundwater and public drinking
supplies from potential contamination and to ensure adequate groundwater availability. They are
treated as critical areas under the Growth Management Act (GMA) and defined in Chapter 23.60 ECDC,
which was last updated in 2016 and states:
Critical aquifer recharge areas (CARAs) are those areas with a critical recharging effect on
aquifers used for potable water as defined by WAC 365-190-030(2). CARAs have prevailing
geologic conditions associated with infiltration rates that create a high potential for
contamination of ground water resources or contribute significantly to the replenishment of
ground water. CARAs are protected as critical areas under the Washington State Growth
Management Act. However, no areas meeting criteria for CARAs exist in the vicinity of the
city of Edmonds. Thus, additional specific provisions for protection of this critical area type
are not provided within this title. [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016, Ord. 3527 § 2, 2004].
[Emphasis added]
In 2022, Edmonds became aware of the presence of CARAs within the City's jurisdiction when the
Olympic View Water and Sewer District (OVWSD) appealed the City's SEPA Determination of
Nonsignificance (DNS) for a stormwater code update. While OVWSD's appeal was denied by the hearing
examiner, staff committed to updating the ECDC to reflect the presence of possible CARAs within city
boundaries. Olympic View provided best available science and mapping of their wellhead protection
areas and buffer to the City (Attachment 2), which were then added to the City's geographic information
system (GIS). The code update in file AMD2023-0004 is a follow-up to that work and will establish
regulations for CARAs in Edmonds consistent with the GMA in RCW 36.70A.020 and RCW 36.70.330.
There are two locations in Edmonds considered critical aquifer recharge areas. Both are locations where
Olympic View has drinking water wells, which supplement the drinking water they purchase from the
City of Seattle: Deer Creek Springs and 228th Street. Deer Creek Springs is in the Town of Woodway
and has operated for decades but much of the protection area and buffer around the springs that will
comprise the CARA are in Edmonds. Land uses in this CARA are low intensity, primarily single-family
residential uses. The 228th Street wellfield, recently completed but awaiting final approval from the
state before it can come online, is in Esperance. Much of the wellhead protection area around this
wellfield is in Esperance (under Snohomish County's jurisdiction) but some of the area and buffer is in
Edmonds. The CARA code will apply to both areas to continue to protect groundwater and ensure
continued access to clean drinking water for Olympic View customers.
Packet Pg. 102
9.2
Staff from the City and Olympic View have been working closely on the draft code amendments and will
continue to do so until the amendment is completed.
Staff Recommendation
No action is required at this meeting. Staff will provide a presentation to Council to orient their future
discussions on the topic. An additional work session is tentatively scheduled for February 6, if necessary.
A public hearing on the topic is tentatively scheduled for February 27 with action anticipated on March
19.
Narrative
Amendments to Chapter 23.60 ECDC are a Type V legislative decision, which requires the Planning Board
to hold a public hearing before making a recommendation to the City Council. A public hearing is also
held by City Council prior to adoption of the code amendment by ordinance.
Consistent with ECDC 20.15A, a SEPA Determination of Nonsignificance was issued on November 9, 2023
- no comments or appeals were received. Notice of the draft code amendment was also provided to the
Department of Commerce.
PrncPss tn datP
The Planning Board held several meetings on the topic (meeting materials from each of the meetings are
weblinked as are reference documents on CARAs from Olympic View and the Departments of
Commerce, Ecology and Health):
1) May 24, 2023 - Introduction to the CARA code amendment
2) July 12, 2023 - Work session
3) July 26, 2023 - Public hearing #1 (held open to August 23 and then to September 13 but
ultimately closed to allow time for additional work, primarily regarding stormwater)
4) October 25, 2023 - Work session on stormwater
5) November 29, 2023 - Public hearing #2
Following the November 29 public hearing, the Planning Board recommended to Council the
redline/strikeout language in Attachment 1. The language includes prohibitions on more intensive land
uses in the both CARAs as well as restrictions on where and how stormwater can be infiltrated into the
ground within the CARAs.
Two items need further work:
1) Whether pollution liability insurance could be required for certain land uses in the CARAs - the
City Attorney is investigating.
2) Whether shallow Underground Injection Control wells (UICs) can be used throughout the Deer
Creek CARA. The City's Stormwater Engineer had proposed that both drilled (deep) and shallow
UICs and all other stormwater infiltration best management practices (BMPs) be prohibited
within the 228th St. CARA because there are more intense land uses in that area (mixed
intensities including the General Commercial zone) and there is existing municipal stormwater
infrastructure that new development can tie into to avoid infiltration (see Attachment 3 for the
stormwater presentation from October 25, 2023).
Packet Pg. 103
9.2
Within the Deer Creek CARA, deep UICs are proposed to be prohibited but shallow UIC systems
and other stormwater infiltration BMPs would be allowed due to the lower intensity land uses in
the area (primarily single family residential) and because there are closed stormwater basins
that completely infiltrate all runoff within the existing portions of that CARA - there is no other
way to feasibly manage stormwater in those specific areas but for infiltration. The shallow
systems would have specific treatment requirements prior to the stormwater being released
into the ground and the proposed requirements for infiltration would be more protective of the
aquifer than current Department of Ecology requirements.
In their recommendation, the Planning Board moved to "disallow any UIC wells - shallow or
drilled - in the QVa areas of the Deer Creek Aquifer but allow shallow UIC wells in the other
areas of that watershed." QVa soils are unconfined and therefore more likely to transfer
contaminants from the surface to the aquifer. Prohibiting all UICs in the Deer Creek CARA would
be the most protective of the aquifer but it would also restrict development in those areas in
the Deer Creek CARA that have no other way to manage stormwater except for infiltration.
Prohibiting infiltration could also lead to:
Increased localized flooding, since infiltration would not be allowed
Depletion of the aquifer due to lack of recharge since the City would be modifying the
existing water rights within drainage basins that are in this CARA
Requiring stormwater runoff be discharged into other drainage basins since runoff
would be stored with no way of conveyance or infiltration out of the closed basins. This
would require approval by the state because the City would be modifying the existing
water rights of those basins.
o If this was approved by the state it would require retention vaults, pumps, and
upsizing/upgrading miles of existing downstream stormwater infrastructure in
Edmonds and the Town of Woodway.
§ Discharging into Deer Creek or Willow Creek/Edmonds Marsh which is
not recommended since the discharge would go directly to:
The well that the CARA is trying to protect for Deer Creek and
increase stream scour occurrences in Deer Creek which would
not be beneficial to aquatic habitat
Edmonds Marsh, which experiences frequent flooding
Attachments:
Attachment 1 - Draft CARA code for CAO and Stormwater Addendum - PB recommended
Attachment 2 - 2018 Olympic View Wellhead Delineation Report
Attachment 3 - Stormwater slides 10.25.23
Olympic View 2023 Watershed Protection Plan
Department of Health Wellhead Protection Guidance
Department of Ecology Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Guidance
Department of Commerce Critical Aquifer Recharge Area Webinar
Department of Commerce Critical Areas Handbook
Planning Board 5.24.23 materials
Planning Board 7.12.23 materials
Planning Board 7.26.23 materials
Report to Council 9.26.23
Packet Pg. 104
9.2
Planning Board 10.25.23 materials
Planning Board 11.29.23 materials
Packet Pg. 105
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
Chapter 23.60
CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS
SeGti.
D+ra 1 Designation
32 60 010 rritisal
23 60 010 rrlti..-.l
Critical
Rating and Mappin..
aquifer rerhar-Re n r dec:..n ntien
aquifer re,.haFge areas designation
(CARAs) thE)s,-- ruitical
aquifer
aquifers
rechaFge areas are areas; %Avith a reehaFging effect en
f9F wateF as def4ned by WAC 365 190 039(2). GARAs have
used
p9table prevailing
r9f F-drnn-.nd--;.
Thus, additional spe6fic for E)f this e-rifir—al type are not
,idprl , oithin
provisions protection
this title [9Fd 4026 § 1 (Att. n) 2016;. nr.r 3527 § 2, 20041
ff
Sections:
23.60.010
23.60.020
23.60.030
23.60.010
Scope.
Administration.
Regulated Activities.
Scope.
Critical aquifer recharge areas (CARAs) are those areas with a critical recharging effect on
aquifers used for potable water as defined by WAC 365-190-030(3). CARAs have prevailing
geologic conditions that create a high potential for contamination of ground water resources or
contribute significantly to the replenishment of ground water. The Growth Management Act
requires cities to adopt regulations to protect CARAs.
The purpose of this chapter is to establish critical aquifer recharge area (CARA) and
groundwater protection standards to protect aquifers from degradation and depletion. The
intent is to minimize loss of recharge quantity, to maintain the protection of public drinking
water sources, and to prevent contamination of groundwater.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended
Packet Pg. 106
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
23.60.020 Administration.
A. Designation. Olympic View Water and Sewer District (Olympic View) has two wellhead
protection areas in Edmonds: Deer Creek Springs and the 228th Street Wellfield. Deer
Creek Springs itself is located west of Edmonds in the Town of Woodway while the 2281h
Street Wellfield is located in Esperance (unicorporated Snohomish County), which is
surrounded by Edmonds. Both areas have been mapped and modeled using best available
science and include four travel time zones (6 month, 1 year, 5 year, and 10 year) plus an
additional buffer. An area of exposed highly sensitive soils (Qva aquifer) is also mapped.
B. Classification. CARAs are classified using the following criteria:
1. Class 1 CARAs include those mapped areas located within the 6 month, one (1) and five
(5) year capture zones of a wellhead protection area.
2. Class 2 CARAs include those mapped areas located within the ten (10) year capture zone
of a wellhead protection area.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended
Packet Pg. 107
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
3. Class 3 CARAs include those mapped areas in the critical aquifer recharge area buffer.
C. Applicability. The provisions of this chapter apply to regulated activities occurring within
Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 CARAs as identified in the City of Edmonds GIS, which may be
updated as new information becomes available.
D. Local consultation. The City of Edmonds will notify Olympic View when new development
applications are submitted within the mapped CARAs. TVpical applications will include but
not be limited to: single family/multifamily/commercial building permits, and short/formal
subdivisions.
E. Hydrogeologic report. A hydrogeologic report is required for activities as noted in the table
ECDC 23.60.030.C. The report must contain the following information:
1. The surface location of all critical aauifer recharge areas located on site or immediatelv
adjacent to the site, and the permeability of the unsaturated zone;
2. Groundwater depth, flow direction, and gradient based on available information;
3. Currently available data on wells and springs within one fourth mile of the site;
4. Currently available information on the location of surface waters within one fourth mile
of the site;
5. Historic water quality data for the area to be affected by the proposed activity or use
compiled for at least the previous five-year period;
6. Discussion of the effects of the proposed protect on the groundwater quality and
quantity, including:
a. Predictive evaluation of groundwater withdrawal effects on nearby wells and
surface water features;
b. Predictive evaluation of contaminant transport based on potential releases to
groundwater;
c. Recharge potential of the site including permeability and transmissivity; and
d. If water use is proposed for the development activity, a description of the
groundwater source of water to the site or a letter from an approved water
purveyor stating the ability to provide water to the site;
7. Best management practices relevant to the proposed activity or use;
8. Provisions to monitor the groundwater quality and quantity;
9. A spill plan that identifies equipment and structures that could fail, resulting in an
impact to the critical aquifer recharge area. Spill plans shall include provisions for
regular inspection, repair, and replacement of structures and equipment with the
potential to fail;
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended
Packet Pg. 108
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
10. An assessment of how the development activity meets the protection standards
established in ECDC 23.60.030.D;
11. If the hydrogeologic report identifies impacts to critical aquifer recharge areas, the
protect applicant will be required to:
a. Identify and provide an analysis of alternatives by which such impacts could be
avoided or prevented; and
b. Provide a detailed mitigation plan for any unavoidable impacts. The mitigation plan
should include preventative measures, monitoring, process control and remediation
and a contingency plan, as appropriate;
12. Recommendations for implementation and operation of activities, including size
limitations, monitoring, reporting and best management practices (BMP); and
13. Any other information necessary to determine compliance with this chapter.
23.60.030 Regulated Activities.
A. Stormwater.
1. The use of stormwater infiltration best management practices (BMPs) including those
that qualify as a Class V Underground Infection Control well (UIC), are prohibited for all
land uses within all wellhead protection areas (WHPAs), including the buffer, associated
with Olympic View Water and Sewer District's (OVWSD) 228th Street Wellhead.
2. Within all WHPAs, associated with Olympic View's Deer Creek Springs, including the
buffer, the following shall apply:
a. All new bored, drilled, or driven shaft UICs for stormwater management purposes
are prohibited.
b. All other new stormwater infiltration BMPs that are not bored, drilled, or driven
shaft UICs shall be regulated by:
Chaster 173-218 WAC. that meet that chaater's definition of a Class V UIC well.
The UIC regulations are implemented by the Washington State Department of
Ecology (Ecology).
ii. The requirements of ECDC 18.30 (Stormwater Management), including the
Ecoloev stormwater manual adoated by ECDC 18.30. and the current Edmonds
Stormwater Addendum
c. In addition, these requirements shall apply to the following allowed activities:
i. All new UICs that replace any existing UIC that has reached its useful life.
ii. Any area that proposes connecting to an existing City -owned and operated UIC.
d. These requirements shall apply until Ecology approves a subsequent version of its
stormwater manual that is more protective of the aquifers than the above
requirements. At that time, the more protective requirements shall apply.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended
Commented [CM1]: Planning Board recommend(
prohibiting deep and shallow UIC wells in the Qva sc
allowing shallow UIC wells in the other areas of the
Creek CARA. This would be a change from the langu
recommended by the City's Stormwater Engineer, w
would allow shallow UICs throughout the Deer Cree
subject to the proposed treatment requirements th.
be added to the Stormwater Addendum.
Packet Pg. 109
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
B. Table 23.60.030.1, CARA Prohibited and Restricted Uses, establishes land uses and related
activities that are prohibited and restricted within a specific CARA classification and applies
to any new use or activity proposed after [MONTH DAY], 2024. New land uses or activities
that pose a hazard to the City's groundwater resources, resulting from storing, handling,
treating, using, producing, recycling, or disposing of hazardous materials or other
deleterious substances, are prohibited in Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas 1 and 2. Some uses
are prohibited in all CARA classes. Uses and activities lawfully established prior to [MONTH
DAY], 2024, are not considered to be legal nonconforming uses subject to Chapter 17.40
ECDC, and may continue to operate within the scope of the existing use.
Table 23.60.030.1. CARA Prohibited and Restricted Uses
All mineral resource uses
Cemeteries
Hazardous liquid transmission pipelines
Hazardous waste storage and/or
treatment facilities and/or processing, or
disposal of radioactive substances
low the water table or the upper surface of the
RA and in exposed OVa soils in Class 3 CARA. A
nd in exposed QVa soils in Class 3 CARA. Best
ianagement practices (BMPs) and integrated pest
ianaeement OPM) are reauired for the use in Class
defined in Chanter 181.881 RCW. DiDelines are
Ireport is reauired for the use in Class 3 CARA outside
all CARA classes.
Draee. Drocessine. or disposal of radioactive
Ieauioment and/or material and medical waste.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended
5
Packet Pg. 110
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
plan are prohibited in Class 1 and 2 CARA as well as
in exposed QVa soils in Class 3 CARA. A
hydrogeologic report is required for the use in Class
3 CARA outside of the area of exposed QVa.
Automotive uses
Wrecking yards are prohibited in all CARA classes.
Vehicle towing yards that store vehicles on
permeable surfaces are also prohibited. Service
stations are prohibited in Class 1 and 2 CARA as well
as in exposed QVa soils in Class 3 CARA. In Class 3
CARA outside of the area of exposed QVa, vehicle
repair and servicing must be conducted indoors over
impermeable pads. For underground storage tanks
(UST) with hazardous substances, applicants must
demonstrate that the facility complies with federal
and state laws.
Dry cleaning
Dry cleaning using chlorinated solvents or using
solvent perch Ioroethylene is prohibited in all CARA
classes.
Large on -site sewage systems, as defined
Prohibited in all CARA.
in Chapter 246 272
WAC
Solid waste landfills
Prohibited in all CARA.
Solid waste is defined in WAC 173 304 100.
Solid waste transfer stations
Prohibited in all CARA.
Solid waste is defined under WAC 173 304 100.
Petroleum refinement processes,
including any related reprocessing or
Prohibited in all CARA.
storage
Bulk storage facilities where flammable or
Prohibited in all CARA.
combustible liquids, solids, or gels are
received by pipeline or tank vehicle, and
are stored or blended in bulk for the
purpose of distributing such substances
by pipeline, tank vehicle, portable tank, or
container
Chemical manufacturing, including but not
Prohibited in Class 1 and 2 CARA as well as in
limited to organic and inorganic
chemicals, plastics and resins,
pharmaceuticals, cleaning compounds,
exposed QVa soils in Class 3 CARA. A hydrogeologic
report is required for the use in Class 3 CARA outside
of the area of exposed QVa. Applicants must
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended
E
Packet Pg. 111
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
paints and lacquers, and agricultural
demonstrate that the facility complies with federal
chemicals
and state laws.
Primary and secondary metal industries
Prohibited in all CARA.
that manufacture, produce, smelt, or
refine ferrous and nonferrous metals from
molten materials
Commercial wood preserving and wood
Prohibited in all CARA.
products preserving
Mobile fleet fueling operations
Prohibited in all CARA.
"Mobile fleet fueling" means the practice of filling
fuel tanks of vehicles from tank vehicles. Mobile fleet
fueling is also known as wet fueling and wet hosing.
Mobile fleet fueling does not include fueling at
construction sites.
Permanent dewatering of the aquifer
Prohibited in all CARA.
when done as part of remediation action
that is approved by the Department of
Ecology
Irrigation and infiltration of greywater
Prohibited in all CARA.
Reclaimed or recycled water use with the
Prohibited in all CARA.
exception of uses that discharge to the
sanitary sewer
Rainwater collection and use
Allowed in all CARA.
Hydrocarbon extraction
Prohibited in all CARA.
Metal recycling facilities with outdoor
Prohibited in Class 1 and 2 CARA as well as in
storage and handling activities
exposed QVa soils in Class 3 CARA. A hydrogeologic
report is required for the use in Class 3 CARA outside
of the area of exposed QVa.
C. Regulation of facilities handling and storing hazardous materials.
Activities may only be permitted in a critical aquifer recharee area if the applicant can show
through providing a hydrogeologic report prepared by a qualified professional, that the
proposed activity will not cause contaminants to enter the groundwater by compliance with
the best management practices (BMPs) for handling and storing hazardous materials. The
Citv may impose development conditions in accordance with BMPs to Drevent deeradation
of groundwater
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended
Packet Pg. 112
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
1. Best Management Practices for Handling and Storing Hazardous Materials.
Any facility, activity, or residence in the City in which hazardous materials or other
deleterious substances are present must be operated in a manner that ensures safe
storage, handling, treatment, use, production, and recycling or disposal of such
materials and substances and prevents their unauthorized release to the environment.
Businesses. cemeteries and schools that store and/or handle hazardous materials must
at a minimum, comply with the following BMPs:
a. Waste disposal and record keeping of disposal and use activity;
b. Spill containment supplies and an emergency response plan;
c. An emergency response training plan for all employees;
d. Hazardous materials must be stored using secondary containment measures at all
times;
e Periodic monitoring of the storage areas and methods used for containment must be
reviewed:
i. On a regular basis;
ii. Whenever business practices change regarding hazardous materials; and
iii. As required by laws and regulations;
f. In no case may hazardous materials or other deleterious substances be stored,
handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, or disposed of in a way that would pose
a significant groundwater hazard within the City.
2. Hazardous Materials Inventory (HMI).
The HMI statement is intended reflect all current and anticipated types and quantities of
hazardous materials that will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced, recycled, or
disposed of at a facility. The HMI must always be kept on site. New and existing
commercial land uses, schools and cemeteries located in Class 1 and Class 2 CARAs must
submit an HMI statement:
a. Within 1 year of the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter;
b. With any new land use or building permit application;
c. With a new business license; and
d. At periodic intervals as needed to keep up with changing business practices.
3. Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP). Hazardous materials quantities
correspond to the aggregate total of all hazardous materials, not individual chemicals.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended
Packet Pg. 113
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
Facilities that use aggregate quantities of hazardous materials equal to or greater than
20 gallons or the equivalent of 200 pounds, or that use hazardous materials that may be
a potential risk to the WHPA, are reviewed to determine the potential risk to the
groundwater and the need for an HMMP. Commercial land uses and activities using
aggregate quantities of hazardous materials equal to or greater than 50 gallons or the
equivalent of 500 pounds, or that use hazardous materials that are considered to be a
potential risk to the groundwater in lower quantities, must submit an HMMP to the City.
a. The City requires an HMMP based on the type and aggregate quantity of inventoried
material. The following are exempt from an HMMP:
i. Retail sale of containers 5 gallons or less in size when the business has fewer than
500 gallons on the premises at anv one time; and
ii. Hazardous materials of no potential risk to the wellhead protection areas.
b. HMMPs must demonstrate implementation of BMPs. An HMMP must be completed
by the facility operator and must always kept on site and include:
i. A description of the facility including a floor plan showing storage, drainage and
use areas. The plans must be legible and approximately to scale;
ii. The plan must include and identify all hazardous materials containers, sizes,
storage locations and methods of secondary containment of the hazardous
materials; and
iii. The plan must, at a minimum, include how the facility implements the BMPs as
identified in this code.
4. Inspections. The Citv has the right to insaect a facilitv at reasonable times for the
purpose of determining compliance with this chapter. Inspections may include, but are
not limited to:
a. Visual inspections of hazardous materials storage and secondary containment area<
b. Inspections of HMMP; and
c. Sampling of soils, surface water and groundwater.
5. Third -Party Review. The City may employ a hydrogeologic consultant licensed in
Washington State at the applicant's expense for third -party review for compliance with
the BMPs, the HMI and the HMMP.
6. Enforcement. Whenever a person has violated any provisions of this chapter, the
Planning and Development Director, in consultation with the Public Works Director as
necessarv. may take code enforcement action based on the nature of the violation
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended
Packet Pg. 114
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
including, but not limited to, abatement, intunction, mitigation, fines and penalties as set
forth in Section 18.30.100 ECDC, Stormwater Management.
D. General requirements.
1. A protect applicant must make all reasonable efforts to avoid and minimize impacts to
critical aauifer recharge areas according to the reauirements of this section. in the
following sequential order of priority:
a. Avoiding impacts altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; or
when avoidance is not possible;
b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation, using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps, such as
protect redesign, relocation, or timing, to avoid or reduce impacts; and
2. Any activity or use specifically listed in this chapter must comply with the best
management practices and mitigation plan identified in the hydrogeologic report.
3. All development activities must comply with the groundwater quality standards
contained in WAC Chapter 173-200 and RCW Chapter 90.48.
4. Where the Director determines that an activitv or use not specifically listed in this
chapter has the potential to harm water quality or quantity within critical aquifer
recharge areas, the applicant must apply best management practices and all known and
available reasonable technology (AKART) appropriate to protect critical aquifer recharge
areas.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended 10
Packet Pg. 115
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
23.40.005 Definitions pertaining to critical areas.
For the purposes of this chapter and the chapters on the five specific critical area types
(Chapters 23.50, 23.60, 23.70, 23.80 and 23.90 ECDC) the following definitions shall apply:
"Adjacent" means those activities located on site immediately adjoining a critical area; or
distance equal to or less than 225 feet of a development proposal or subject parcel.
"Alteration" means any human -induced action which changes the existing condition of a critical
area or its buffer. Alterations include, but are not limited to: grading; filling; dredging; draining;
channelizing; cutting, pruning, limbing or topping, clearing, relocating or removing vegetation;
applying herbicides or pesticides or any hazardous or toxic substance; discharging pollutants;
paving, construction, application of gravel; modifying for surface water management purposes;
or any other human activity that changes the existing landforms, vegetation, hydrology, wildlife
or wildlife habitat value of critical areas.
"Aquifer" means a body of soil or rock that contains sufficient saturated material to conduct
groundwater and yield usable quantities of groundwater to springs and/or wells.
Best Available Science. See ECDC 23.40.310.
"Best management practices" means a system of practices and management measures that:
1. Control soil loss and reduce water quality degradation caused by nutrients, animal waste,
and toxics;
2. Control the movement of sediment and erosion caused by land alteration activities;
3. Minimize adverse impacts to surface and ground water quality, flow, and circulation
patterns; and
4. Minimize adverse impacts to the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of
critical areas.
"Buffer" means the designated area immediately next to and a part of a steep slope or landslide
hazard area and which protects slope stability, attenuation of surface water flows and landslide
hazards reasonably necessary to minimize risks to persons or property; or a designated area
immediately next to and part of a stream or wetland that is an integral part of the stream or
wetland ecosystem. For critical aquifer recharge areas, the buffer is that area outside of the
WHPA time of travel zones established by WAC 246-290, which defines the entire zone of
contribution for the CARA.
"Chapter" means those sections of this title sharing the same third and fourth digits.
"City" means the city of Edmonds.
City Council or Council. See ECDC 21.15.030.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended 11
Packet Pg. 116
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
"Class" or "wetland class" means descriptive categories of wetland vegetation communities
within the wetlands taxonomic classification system of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Cowardin, et al., 1979).
"Clearing" means the act of cutting and/or removing vegetation. This definition shall include
grubbing vegetation and the use or application of herbicide.
"Compensation project" means an action(s) specifically designed to replace project -induced
critical area or buffer losses. Compensation project design elements may include, but are not
limited to: land acquisition procedures and detailed plans including functional value
assessments, detailed landscaping designs, construction drawings, and monitoring and
contingency plans.
"Compensatory mitigation" means replacing project -induced losses or impacts to a critical area,
and includes, but is not limited to, the following:
1. "Creation" means actions performed to intentionally establish a wetland at a site where it
did not formerly exist.
2. "Reestablishment" means actions performed to restore processes and functions to an
area that was formerly a critical area, where the former critical area was lost by past
alterations and activities.
3. "Rehabilitation" means improving or repairing processes and functions to an area that is
an existing critical area that is highly degraded because one or more environmental
processes supporting the critical area have been disrupted.
4. "Enhancement" means actions performed to improve the condition of existing degraded
wetlands so that the functions they provide are of a higher quality
5. "Preservation" means actions taken to ensure the permanent protection of existing high -
quality wetlands.
"Creation" means a compensation project performed to intentionally establish a wetland or
stream at a site where one did not formerly exist.
"Critical aquifer recharge areas (CARAs)" are areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers
used for potable water, including areas where an aquifer that is a source of drinking water is
vulnerable to contamination that would affect the potability of the water, or is susceptible to
reduced recharge. These areas are identified on the City's GIS using information provided by
Olympic View Water and Sewer District, as periodically updated.
"Critical areas" for the city of Edmonds means wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas,
frequently flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, and fish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas as defined in Chapters 2L.5 23.60, 23.70, 23.80 and 23.90 ECDC,
respectively.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended 12
Packet Pg. 117
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
"Deleterious substances" include, but are not limited to, chemical and microbial substances that
are not classified as hazardous materials per this chapter, whether the substances are in usable
or waste condition, that have the potential to pose a significant groundwater hazard, or for
which monitoring requirements or treatment -based standards are enforced under Chapter 246-
290 WAC.
"Development proposal" means any activity relating to the use and/or development of land
requiring a permit or approval from the city, including, but not limited to: commercial or
residential building permit; binding site plan; conditional use permit; franchise; right-of-way
permit; grading and clearing permit; mixed use approval; planned residential development;
shoreline conditional use permit; shoreline substantial development permit; shoreline variance;
short subdivision; special use permit; subdivision; flood hazard permit; unclassified use permit;
utility and other use permit; variance; rezone; or any required permit or approval not expressly
exempted by this title.
"Director" means the city of Edmonds development services director or his/her designee.
"Division" means the planning division of the city of Edmonds development services
department.
"Enhancement" means an action taken to improve the condition and function of a critical area.
In the case of wetland or stream, the term includes a compensation project performed to
improve the conditions of an existing degraded wetland or stream to increase its functional
value.
"Erosion" means the process in which soil particles are mobilized and transported by natural
agents such as wind, rain, frost action, or stream flow.
Erosion Hazard Areas. See ECDC 23.80.020(A).
Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. See Chapter 23.90 ECDC.
"Floodplain" means the total area subject to inundation by a "100-year flood." "100-year flood"
means a flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year.
"Footprint of existing development" or "footprint of development" means the area of a site that
contains legally established: buildings; roads, driveways, parking lots, storage areas, walkways or
other areas paved with concrete, asphalt or compacted gravel; outdoor swimming pools; patios.
Frequently Flooded Areas. See Chapter 23.70 ECDC.
"Functions" means the roles served by critical areas including, but not limited to: water quality
protection and enhancement; fish and wildlife habitat; food chain support; flood storage,
conveyance and attenuation; ground water recharge and discharge; erosion control; wave
attenuation; aesthetic value protection; and recreation. These roles are not listed in order of
priority.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended 13
Packet Pg. 118
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
Geologically Hazardous Areas. See Chapter 23.80 ECDC
"Geologist" means a person licensed as a geologist, engineering geologist, or hydrologist in the
state of Washington. For geologically hazardous areas, an applicant may choose a geologist or
engineering geologist licensed in the state of Washington to assess the potential hazard.
"Geotechnical engineer" means a practicing geotechnical/civil engineer licensed as a
professional civil engineer in the state of Washington who has at least five years of professional
employment as a geotechnical engineer in responsible charge including experience with
landslide evaluation.
"Grading" means any one or a combination of excavating, filling, or disturbance of that portion
of the soil profile which contains decaying organic matter.
"Habitats of local importance" means areas that include a seasonal range or habitat element
with which a given species has a primary association, and which, if altered, may reduce the
likelihood that the species will maintain and reproduce over the long term. These might include
areas of high relative density or species richness, breeding habitat, winter range, and movement
corridors. These might also include habitats that are of limited availability or high vulnerability
to alterations such as cliffs, talus, and wetlands. In urban areas like the city of Edmonds, habitats
of local importance include biodiversity areas and corridors, which are characterized by a
framework of ecological components which provides the physical conditions necessary for
ecosystems and species populations to survive in a human -dominated landscape.
"Hazardous materials" means any material, either singularly or in combination, that is a physical
or health hazard, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition: and any material that
may degrade surface water or groundwater quality when improperly stored, handled, treated,
used, produced, recycled, disposed of, or otherwise mismanaged. Hazardous materials also
include: all materials defined as or designated by rule as a dangerous waste or extremely
hazardous waste under Chapter 70A.300 RCW and Chapter 173-303 WAC: hazardous materials
also include petroleum or petroleum products that are in liquid phase at ambient temperatures,
including any waste oils or sludges.
"Hazardous materials inventory (HMI)" is an inventory of all current and anticipated types and
quantities of hazardous materials that will be stored, handled, treated, used, produced,
recycled, or disposed of at a facility as required in ECDC 23.60.030.C.2, Hazardous Materials
Inventory (HMI).
"Hazardous materials management plan (HMMP)" is a plan completed by the operator that
demonstrates how the facility implements required BMPs as required in ECDC 23.60.030.C.3,
Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP).
"In -lieu fee program" means a program which sells compensatory mitigation credits to
permittees whose obligation to provide compensatory mitigation is then transferred to the in -
lieu program sponsor, a governmental or nonprofit natural resource management entity.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended 14
Packet Pg. 119
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
Landslide Hazard Areas. See ECDC 23.80.020(B).
"Mitigation" means the use of any or all of the following actions for activities and development
on sites containing critical areas, except critical area aquifer recharge areas, which are listed in
descending order of priority:
1. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
2. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its
implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps such as
project redesign, relocation, or timing to avoid or reduce impacts;
3. Rectifying the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently flooded
areas, and habitat conservation areas by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the
affected environment to the historical conditions or the conditions existing at the time of
the initiation of the project;
4. Minimizing or eliminating the hazard by restoring or stabilizing the hazard area through
engineered or other methods;
5. Reducing or eliminating the impact or hazard over time by preservation and maintenance
operations during the life of the action;
6. Compensating for the impact to wetlands, critical aquifer recharge areas, frequently
flooded areas, and habitat conservation areas by replacing, enhancing, or providing
substitute resources or environments; and
7. Monitoring the hazard or other required mitigation and taking remedial action when
necessary.
"Native vegetation" means vegetation comprised of plant species which are indigenous to the
Puget Sound region and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the
site. "Native vegetation" does not include noxious weeds as defined by the state of Washington
or federal agencies.
"Normal maintenance of vegetation" means removal of shrubs/nonwoody vegetation and trees
(less than four -inch diameter at breast height) that occurs at least every other year.
Maintenance also may include tree topping that has been previously approved by the city in the
past five years.
"Noxious weeds" means any plant that is highly destructive, competitive or difficult to control
by cultural or chemical practices, limited to those plants on the state noxious weed list
contained in Chapter 16-750 WAC.
"Planning staff" means those employed in the planning division of the city of Edmonds
development services department.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended 15
Packet Pg. 120
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
"Qualified critical areas consultant" or "qualified professional" means a person who has the
qualifications specified below to conduct critical areas studies pursuant to this title, and to make
recommendations for critical areas mitigation. For geologically hazardous areas, the qualified
critical areas consultant shall be a geologist or engineering geologist licensed in the state of
Washington to assess the potential hazard. If development is to take place within a geologically
hazardous area, the qualified critical areas consultant developing mitigation plans and design
shall be a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington and familiar with landslide
and slope stability mitigation. For wetlands and streams, the qualified critical areas consultant
shall be a specialist in botany, fisheries, wetland biology, and/or hydrology with a minimum of
five years' field experience with wetlands and/or streams in the Pacific Northwest.
Requirements defining a qualified critical areas consultant or qualified professional are
contained within the chapter on each critical area type. For critical aquifer recharge areas, the
qualified professional must be a currently licensed Washington State geologist holding a current
specialty license in hydrogeology.
"Reasonable economic use(s)" means the minimum use to which a property owner is entitled
under applicable state and federal constitutional provisions in order to avoid a taking and/or
violation of substantive due process.
"Recharge" means the process involved in the absorption and addition of water from the
unsaturated zone to groundwater.
"Redeveloped land(s)" means those lands on which existing structures are demolished in their
entirety to allow for new development. The director shall maintain discretion to determine if
the demolition of a majority of existing structures or portions thereof constitute the
redevelopment of a property or subject parcel.
"Restoration" means the actions necessary to return a stream, wetland or other critical area to
a state in which its stability, functions and values approach its unaltered state as closely as
possible. For wetlands, restoration as compensatory mitigation may include reestablishment or
rehabilitation.
Seismic Hazard Areas. See ECDC 23.80.020(C).
"Species of local importance" means those species that are of local concern due to their
population status, their sensitivity to habitat manipulation, or that are game (hunted) species
(See ECDC 23.90.010(A)(4).)
"Storm Water Management Manual" means the storm water manual specified in
Chapter 18.30 ECDC.
"Streams" means any area where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed which
demonstrates clear evidence, such as the sorting of sediments, of the passage of water. The
channel or bed need not contain water year-round. This definition is not meant to include
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended 16
Packet Pg. 121
9.2.a
Draft Edmonds CARA Update 2023 - 2024
irrigation ditches, canals, storm or surface water runoff devices (drainage ditches) or other
entirely artificial watercourses unless they are used by salmonids or used to convey streams
naturally occurring prior to construction of such watercourse. Streams are further classified into
Categories S, F, Np and Ns and fishbearing or nonfishbearing 1, 2 and 3. (See
ECDC 23.90.010(A)(1).)
"Title" means all chapters of the city of Edmonds Development Code beginning with the digits
23.
"Undeveloped land(s)" means land(s) on which manmade structures or land modifications
(clearing, grading, etc.) do not exist. The director retains discretion to identify undeveloped
land(s) in those instances where historical modifications and structures may have existed on a
property or subject parcel in the past.
"Underground Infection Control Well" as defined in Chapter 173-218 WAC and associated
guidance documents.
"Wellhead protection area (WHPAY' means protective areas associated with public drinking
water sources established by water systems and approved or assigned by the state Department
of Health.
"Wetland functions" means those natural processes performed by wetlands, such as facilitating
food chain production; providing habitat for nesting, rearing and resting sites for aquatic,
terrestrial or avian species; maintaining the availability and quality of water; acting as recharge
and/or discharge areas for ground water aquifers; and moderating surface water and storm
water flows.
"Wetland mitigation bank" means a site where wetlands are restored, created, enhanced, or in
exceptional circumstances, preserved expressly for the purpose of providing compensatory
mitigation in advance of authorized impacts to similar resources.
"Wetlands" means those areas that are inundated or saturated by ground or surface water at a
frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support,
a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands do
not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland sites, including, but
not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass -lined swales, canals, detention facilities,
wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands
created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a
road, street or highway. However, wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally
created from nonwetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands if permitted by the
city (WAC 365-190-030(22)). Wetlands are further classified into Categories 1, 2, 3 and 4. (See
ECDC 23.50.010(B).) [Ord. 4026 § 1 (Att. A), 2016; Ord. 3952 § 1, 2013; Ord. 3931 § 2, 2013; Ord.
3527 § 2, 2004. Formerly 23.40.3201.
draft Edmonds CARA ECDC 23.60 v6 1.23.24 - Planning Board recommended 17
Packet Pg. 122
9.2.a
Managing Stormwater Runnoff in CARAs — For Stormwater Addendum Only
• The City of Edmonds does not implement or enforce the UIC regulations, and they are
independent of the City's stormwater regulations. It is the responsibility of the applicant to
abide by all applicable Federal and State requirements related to UICs.
• The use of stormwater infiltration best management practices (BMPs) including those that
qualify as a Class V Underground Injection Control well (UIC), are prohibited for all land uses
within all wellhead protection areas (WHPAs), including the buffer, associated with Olympic
View Water and Sewer District's (OVWSD) 228th Street Wellhead.
Within all WHPAs, associated with OVWSD's Deer Creek Springs, including the buffer,
stormwater infiltration systems including UICs, shall be regulated using Ecology's 2019
Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW), including Volume I,
Section 1.4 (UIC Program); provided that Tables 1-4.2 (Vadose Zone Treatment Capacity), 1-4.3
(Pollutant Loading Classifications for Solids, Metals, and Oil in Stormwater Runoff Directed to
UIC Wells), and 1-4.4 (Treatment Required for Solids, Oil, and Metals) in the SWMMWW shall not
apply and are superseded by the following tables, respectively, to be more protective of the
aquifers:
Table 1- Assumed Vadose Zone Treatment Capacity by Wellhead Protection Area
Assumed Treatment
Wellhead Protection Areal
Capacity2
Additional Protection Areas for Exposed Ova Aquifer
None
All other Zones
Low
1-From Figure 8, Appendix B (Wellhead Protection Areas Delineation, Robinson Noble, Inc.) - 2018
Watershed Protection Plan. Olympic View Water & Sewer District. Pace Engineering, 11/2018.
2 -- From Table 1-4.2 (Vadose Zone Treatment Capacity) - 2019 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual
for Western Washington, modified to be more protective of aquifer.
Table 2 - - Pollutant Loading Classifications for Solids, Metals,
and Oil in Stormwater Runoff Directed to UIC Wells
Pollutant Loading
Land Use'
Risk
Single -Family Residential (SFR) lots
Low
Multifamily Residential
Medium
All Other not mentioned above
High
Roadway'
Local
Low
Collector
Minor Arterial
Medium
Principal Arterial
High
1- Site zoning at time of permit application
2 - From Table 1-4.3 (Pollutant Loading Classification for Solids, Metals and Oil in
Stormwater Runoff Directed to UIC Wells) - 2019 Ecology Stormwater
Management Manual for Western Washington, modified to be more protective.
3 - Figure 3-1- Roadway Functional Classification - Edmonds 2015
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Packet Pg. 123
9.2.a
Managing Stormwater Runnoff in CARAs — For Stormwater Addendum Only
Table 3: Treatment Required for Solids, Oil, and Metals'
Assumed Treatment Capacity
Pollutant Loading
Risk
Low
None
Low
Pretreatment'
Remove Solids'
Medium
Remove SolidS3
Remove SolidS3
High
Remove Oil & SolidS3'
Remove Oil & SolidS3•4
1- From the 2019 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington
(SWMMWW), modified to be more protective (Table 1-4.4).
2 - Pretreatment removes solids, but at a level less than basic treatment. Ecology's definition
for pre-treatment is 50% removal. See the definition for pretreatment in the Glossary of the
SwMMWw.
3 - Treatment to remove solids means basic treatment. See the definition of basic treatment in
the Glossary of the SWMMWW. Removal of solids removes a large portion of the total metals
in most stormwater runoff. Any special treatment requirements in the SWMMWW still apply.
4 -Treatment to remove oil is to be accomplished by applying one of the oil control BMPs
identified in the SWMMWW. See BMP T11.10: API (Baffle type) Separator and BMP T11.11:
Coalescing Plate (CP) Separator in the SWMMWW.
• At high -density intersections and at commercial or industrial sites subject to an expected
average daily traffic (ADT) count of 100 vehicles/1,000 sf gross building area, sufficient
quantities of oil may be generated to justify operation of a separator BMP.
• At other high -use sites, project proponents may select a basic treatment BMP that also
provides adsorptive capacity, such as a biofiltration or bioinfiltration swale, a filter, or other
adsorptive technology, in lieu of a separator BMP. A catch basin with a turned down elbow is
not adequate for oil control in this case.
• The requirement to apply a basic treatment BMP with adsorptive characteristics also applies
to commercial parking and to streets with ADT> 7,500.
E
r
Z
C
d
E
t
ca
Q
C
E
t
U
M
Q
Packet Pg. 124
9.2.b
ROBINSON
NOBLE
OLYMPIC VIEW WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA DELINEATION
DEER CREEK SPRINGS AND 228" STREET WELLFIELD
August 2018
by
Max T. Wills, LHG
Associate Hydrogeologist
Max Thomas Wills
2105 South C Street 17625 130th Avenue NE. Suite 102
Tacoma, Washington 9UO2 www.robinson•noble.com Wwdinvilfe, Ww;, - I - - »'^'
P- 253.475,7711 1 F: 253.472.5846 P. 425.488.0599 1 Packet Pg. 125
9.2.b
Olympic View Water and Sewer District
Wellhead Protection Area Delineation
Deer Creek Springs and 22811 Street Wellfield
August 2018
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND................................................................................1
2.0 WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA DELINEATION................................................................1
2.1 GENERAL...............................................................................................................................1
2.2 NUMERICAL GROUNDWATER MODEL.......................................................................................2
2.2.1 Previous Studies and Other Model Input Sources........................................................
2
2.2.2 Conceptual Model.........................................................................................................3
2.2.2.1 Hydrostratigraphic Units.........................................................................................4
YoungerAlluvium (Qyal).................................................................................................5
Vashon Recessional Outwash (Qvr)...............................................................................5
VashonTill(Qvt)..............................................................................................................5
Vashon Advance Outwash (Qva)....................................................................................5
Pre-Vashon Transitional Beds (Qtb)................................................................................6
2.2.2.2 Boundary Identification..........................................................................................6
2.2.2.3 General Flow System.............................................................................................7
2.2.3 Numerical Model Construction.....................................................................................
8
2.2.3.1 Numerical Model Inputs.........................................................................................8
2.2.3.2 Model Calibration.................................................................................................10
2.3 WELLFIELD AND SPRING SOURCE WHPA DELINEATION..........................................................
10
3.0 SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................11
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................................12
5.0 REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................12
FIGURES
1 . VICINITY MAP WITH SERVICE AREA
2. CONCEPTUAL MODEL
3. SURFICIAL GEOLOGY MAP
4. MODEL BOUNDARIES
5. MODEL CALIBRATION
6. POTENTIOMETRIC CONTOUR MAP
7. WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA MAP
8. ADDITIONAL PRECAUTION AREA MAP
TABLES
1. HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNITS
2. MODEL CALIBRATION STATISTICS
Robinson Noble, Inc. 1686-007A Packet Pg. 126
9.2.b
Olympic View Water and Sewer District
Wellhead Protection Area Delineation
Deer Creek Springs and 22811 Street Wellfield
August 2018
1.0 Introduction and Background
The Olympic View Water & Sewer District (District) provides water to an estimated 13,000 cus-
tomers within an approximately two square mile service area in southwestern Snohomish
County (PACE, 2009). The District currently receives about 60% of their supply water through
an intertie with the City of Seattle. The remaining 40% is derived from the District's water
treatment plant at Deer Creek Springs. The District is also currently in the process of develop-
ing an additional groundwater source at their 228th Street wellfield. This wellfield will augment
the supply from Deer Creek Springs and reduce dependency on the water purchased from Se-
attle. The District recently completed the construction and testing of two supply wells at the
228th Street site and is currently in the process of constructing site infrastructure. Figure 1 pre-
sents a map of the District's service area and shows the locations of the Deer Creek Springs
and 2281h Street wellfield source areas.
In anticipation of bringing the new wellfield online, the District is updating their existing Well-
head Protection Program (WHPP) to include the new wellfield source and a more current as-
sessment of the spring source. As part of the WHPP update, Robinson Noble was retained to
delineate wellhead protection areas (WHPAs) for the 2281h Street wellfield and to re -delineate
and update the WHPAs for the spring source. This report documents the methods utilized to
complete the delineation process and presents the new wellfield WHPAs and the updated
WHPAs for the existing spring source.
2.0 Wellhead Protection Area Delineation
2.1 General
The Washington State Department of Health's (DOH) Wellhead Protection Program Guidance
(DOH, 2010) states that all Group A public water systems' must prepare a Water System Plan
(WAC 246-290-100), which will include a Wellhead Protection Program (WHPP). The WHPP will
in turn include Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) delineated for each well, wellfield, or spring
source (WAC 246-290-135). DOH requires that each source have three designated WHPAs, la-
beled Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3, based respectively on the one-year, five-year, and ten-year
time -of -travel capture zones2. Per DOH guidance (DOH, 2010), Zone 1 (the one-year capture
zone) should also include a six-month capture zone to focus greater protection on potential viral
and microbial contamination that may pose a higher degree of risk to the drinking water supply.
A Group A public water system is defined by WAC 246-290 generally as any pubic water system that serves 15 or
more connections on a year-round bases.
2 The capture zone refers to the zone of groundwater contribution for a given source. Specific time -of -travel capture
zones (i.e. one-year capture zone) refer to that portion of the total capture zone in which water will travel to the
source within the specified travel time. Travel times to the source, and consequently the size and shape of the
time -of -travel capture zone, will vary depending on the hydrogeologic properties associated with that specific
zone (i.e. gradient, porosity, pumping rates, etc.).
Robinson Noble, Inc. 1686-007A Packet Pg. 127
9.2.b
DOH has also established the use of a buffer zone as required to provide additional source pro-
tection up -gradient of the ten-year capture zone. According to DOH guidance (DOH, 2010),
buffer zones may incorporate the entire capture zone for a given source or select portions of it
and, as appropriate, may also include areas outside of a given capture zone. As described in this
report, buffer zones which incorporate the entirety of the defined capture zones for both the
228' wellfield and Deer Creek Spring sources are included with the WHPAs for each source.
The WHPAs for both the 228t" Street wellfield and the Deer Creek Springs sources were delin-
eated using a numerical groundwater model that was specifically developed for this project.
Because there is a reasonably sufficient amount of geologic and hydrogeologic data available
for the study area, a modeling approach for WHPA delineation was deemed to be more accu-
rate (and more appropriate) than the standard calculated -fixed radius (CFR) method. Model de-
velopment and calibration are described below in Section 2.2. WHPA delineation is described in
Section 2.3.
2.2 Numerical Groundwater Model
The development of a numerical groundwater model involves several key steps, starting with
the review and compilation of data from existing studies and other sources, which provide in-
formation pertaining to the various model inputs. Once the available data have been compiled
and evaluated, model construction begins with the development of a conceptual model. The
conceptual model, which is typically diagrammatic, provides a generalized overview of the ma-
jor model components and guides the overall groundwater model construction. Once a basic
groundwater model is constructed, it is then finalized by calibrating outputs to known data
points (i.e. head values, discharge, etc.). The calibrated model can then be used to perform a
number of analytical tasks, which for this project includes the delineation of the wellfield and
spring source WHPAs.
2.2.1 Previous Studies and Other Model Input Sources
Parameter inputs for the groundwater model developed for this project were obtained from a
number of sources, including well construction and testing reports, geologic and hydrogeologic
studies, government databases, and geologic maps. The following is a summary of the key data
sources utilized for this project.
King County, Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment Division,
2003; Brightwater Treatment Plant, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Appendix 6-B
(Geology and Groundwater). This study provides key data pertaining to subsurface geologic
conditions and aquifer elevations. Groundwater monitoring data and potentiometric maps
from this study were also utilized in part for final model calibration.
Liesch, B.A., Price, C.E., and Walters, K.C., 1963; Geology and Groundwater Resources of
Northwest King County, Washington. Washington State Department of Conservation, Wa-
ter Supply Bulletin No. 20. This study provides key information for the southern portion of
the modeled area, including recharge and model unit descriptions.
Minard, J.P., 1983; Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles,
Washington; USGS Miscellaneous Field Studies, Map MF-1541. This map was utilized for a
variety of model inputs, including the surficial distribution of geologic units, estimated re-
charge values, and aquifer elevations.
Newcomb, R.C., 1952; Groundwater Resources of Snohomish County, Washington; USGS ``
Water Supply Paper 1135. This report provides detailed information about the geologic and
Page 2 1686-007A Robinson No Packet Pg. 128
9.2.b
hydrogeologic units within the project area, as well as information pertaining to general flow
characteristics of area aquifers.
Robinson Noble, Inc., 2003; Olympic View Water & Sewer District, Modification and Testing
of the 2281h Street Production Well (Shop Well). This report provides key model input data
for the area around the 2281h Street wellfield. This includes hydraulic conductivity values and
aquifer elevation data. Groundwater elevation data for this site was also utilized in part for
final model calibration.
Robinson Noble, Inc., 2015; Olympic View Water & Sewer District, 8605 228' Street Test
Well. This report provides additional information pertaining to model feature elevations in
the area of the 2281h Street wellfield, hydraulic conductivity values, and other hydrogeologic
parameters. Survey data from this study also provided key information pertaining to the
gradient and flow directions of groundwater in the area of the 22811 Street wellfield. Water
level data from this study was also used for model calibration.
Robinson Noble, Inc., 2018; Olympic View Water & Sewer District, Construction and Test-
ing of Production Well 2. This report provides key model input data for the area around the
228' Street wellfield. This includes hydraulic conductivity values, production rates, and aqui-
fer elevation data. Water level and drawdown data from this study were also used in part
for final model calibration.
Shannon and Wilson, Inc., 2016; Hydrogeologic Report New Madrona K-8 Project, 9300
236`h Street SW, Edmonds, Washington. This report provides specific model input data, in-
cluding hydraulic conductivity values, water level data, and flow directions, in the up -
gradient areas east of Deer Creek Springs. Monitoring data from this study was also used in
part for final model calibration.
Thomas, B.E., Wilkenson, J.M., and Embrey, S.S., 1997; The Groundwater System and
Groundwater Quality in Western Snohomish County, Washington; USGS Water Resources
Investigations Report 96-4312. This report provides detailed information regarding the char-
acteristics of the hydrogeologic units within the project area. It also provides key infor-
mation regarding aquifer elevations, recharge values, and flow data that was utilized in part
for final model calibration.
In addition to the reports and studies listed above, this project utilized a number of other mis-
cellaneous sources to support model development. Between 2004 and 2010, in conjunction
with the Brightwater sewer tunnel construction, Robinson Noble conducted extensive ground-
water monitoring at the both the Deer Creek Springs site and the original shop well (located
near the current 2281h Street wellfield). Hydrographs created during this monitoring were used
for final model calibration, and precipitation data collected during the monitoring effort were
used to evaluate the modeled recharge values. We also accessed the Washington State De-
partment of Ecology's (Ecology) online well log data base. We estimate that this database con-
tains approximately 1,200 well reports (well logs) for the study area. These logs were first
screened for reliability, and then reliable logs were utilized for a variety of model input infor-
mation (i.e. aquifer elevation, water levels for calibration, etc.).
2.2.2 Conceptual Model
A hydrogeologic conceptual model is a representation of a groundwater flow system that sim-
plifies and organizes various geologic and hydrologic information so that the flow system can
be more readily analyzed (Anderson and Woessner, 1992). The conceptual model synthesizes
available data (maps, cross -sections, hydrographs, well logs, etc.) into a generalized representa-
Robinson Noble, Inc. 1686-007A Packet Pg. 129
9.2.b
tion of the geology as it affects the groundwater flow system in a given area. Ideally, a concep-
tual model should be as simple as possible but still contain all of the applicable components
necessary to recreate flow system behavior. Once it is developed, the conceptual model serves
as a guide for the construction of the final groundwater model.
Figure 2 presents the conceptual model that was developed for this project as a schematic
cross section. The conceptual model for this project contains three major components: hy-
drostratigraphic units, model boundaries, and general flow system inflow and outflow infor-
mation. These components are described in detail below.
2.2.2.1 Hydrostratigraphic Units
A key step in developing the conceptual model is to define the various hydrostratigraphic units
that will affect the flow system being modeled. Hydrostratigraphic units are groupings of sedi-
ments that exhibit similar hydrogeologic properties. They are typically divided into two general
groups which include aquifers and confining units and may or may not correspond with the area
geologic units.
Within the project area, the hydrostratigraphic units modeled do generally correspond with the
area geologic units. Figure 3 shows the surficial geology within the study area (Minard, 1983).
Table 1 summarizes the hydrostratigraphic units applicable to this project, which are listed from
top to bottom in stratigraphic order (youngest to oldest or in general order of deposition).
Table 1: Hydrostratigraphic Units
Hydrostratigraphic
Hydrogeologic
Unit Description
Unit
Classification
Aquifer (when in
Fluvial sands and gravels with lesser organic mate -
Younger Alluvium
direct contact with
rial. Thin and limited lateral extent. For modeling
(Qyal)
Qva)
purposes, this unit is grouped with the Qva aquifer
when it is in direct contact with Qva materials.
Aquifer (when in
Sands and gravels with lesser clay and silt. For
Vashon Recessional
direct contact with
modeling purposes, this unit is grouped with the
Outwash (Qvr)
Qva)
Qva aquifer when it is in direct contact with Qva
materials.
Dense, unsorted clay -through gravel- and cobble -
size material. This is the most extensive surficial
Vashon Till (Qvt)
Confining Unit
deposit in the study area. It has a low permeability,
is upwards of 100 feet thick, and forms a protec-
tive cap over the Qva aquifer.
Sands with lesser gravel. Laterally extensive
Vashon Advance
Aquifer
across the study area with thicknesses ranging
Outwash (Qva)
from 100 to 150 feet. This unit is partially saturated
and considered an unconfined aquifer system.
Low permeability sequence of layered clay -
Transitional Beds
Confining Unit
through find sand -size material. This unit is relative-
ly thick across the model area and forms the base
of the model.
Page 4 1686-007A Robinson No Packet Pg. 130
9.2.b
Both the Deer Creek Springs and the 228th Street wellfield derive groundwater from the Vashon
advance outwash (Qva), which is referred to in this study as the Ova aquifer. As shown on Fig-
ure 3, the Ova aquifer is exposed at the surface in several parts of the study area, but is largely
overlain by Quaternary Vashon till (Qvt). As shown in Figure 2, the Qvt forms the upper surface
of the model where it is present. In areas where the Qvt is absent, the Ova forms the upper
surface of the model. The Ova aquifer is underlain across the study area by pre-Vashon transi-
tional beds (Qtb). This unit constitutes the lower surface of the model (see Figure 2). A detailed
description of the hydrostratigraphic units utilized for this project is presented below.
Younger Alluvium (Qyal)
As shown in Figure 3, the Qyal hydrostratigraphic unit has limited aerial extent within the study
area, and is generally constrained to narrow zones along stream corridors. As described by vari-
ous authors (see Section 2.2.1), the Qyal consists of fluvial sand and gravel deposits with some
organic materials. The Qyal is relatively thin and typically underlain by adjacent map units. Be-
cause the Qyal is relatively porous, when it is in direct contact with the Ova aquifer, it responds
hydraulically as an extension of the aquifer. In these situations, the Qyal is considered part of
the Ova aquifer. In situations where the Qyal is geologically isolated from the Ova, there isn't
hydraulic continuity with the Ova aquifer, so it is grouped with the Qvt hydrostratigraphic unit.
Vashon Recessional Outwash (Qvr)
Similar to the Qyal, the Qvr has limited aerial extent within the study area and is relatively thin.
The Qvr is comprised of stratified sands and gravels with lesser silt- and clay -size material,
which were deposited by the receding Vashon continental glacier. Similar to the Qyal, the Qvr
is relatively porous, so when it is in direct contact with the Ova aquifer, it responds hydraulically
as an extension of the aquifer. As such, the Qvr is considered part of the Ova aquifer in these
situations. Where the Qvr is geologically isolated from the Ova it is grouped with the Qvt hy-
drostratigraphic unit.
Vashon Till (Qvt)
The Qvt consists of a dense, unsorted mixture of clay- through gravel- and cobble -size sedi-
ments that were deposited in situ by the Vashon continental glacier. The Qvt is the predomi-
nant surficial deposit within the study area, and typically extends to depths of over 100 feet.
The Qvt has a low permeability, and where present, it impedes infiltration of precipitation. This
provides a protective cap for the underlying Ova aquifer. The Qvt often contains isolated pock-
ets of more permeable material, which may contain perched groundwater'. However, these
perched zones are usually very limited in extent, and the Qvt hydrostratigraphic unit, for the
purpose of modeling, is considered to be unsaturated.
Vashon Advance Outwash (Qva)
The Qva is comprised of stratified sands with lesser gravel- and silt -size materials, which were
laid down by meltwater issuing from the advancing Vashon continental glacier. The Qva is lat-
erally extensive within the study area, but there are a few isolated areas, primarily along the
study area boundaries, where the Qva is not present. The thickness of the Qva within the study
area generally ranges from between 100 to 130 feet. The Qva materials are not fully saturated
within the study area, and the Qva aquifer is considered an unconfined aquifer system. As
a Perched groundwater is groundwater that accumulates in isolated pockets of permeable material at elevations
above that of the local water table (hence the term "perched").
Robinson Noble, Inc. 1686-007A Packet Pg. 131
9.2.b
mentioned previously, the Qva aquifer is the groundwater source for Deer Creek Springs and
the 22811 Street wellfield.
Pre-Vashon Transitional Beds (Qtb)
The Qtb is a layered sequence of very low permeability materials that were laid down in lakes
and non -glacial fluvial systems prior to the deposition of the Qva sands. The Qtb consists of
beds and laminae of clay-, silt-, and very fine sand -size material, with occasional zones of peat
and organic material. The Qtb is consistently present across the study area and has an estimat-
ed thickness of approximately 130 feet within the model area. As mentioned previously, the
Qtb forms the base of the model for this project (see Figure 2).
2.2.2.2 Boundary Identification
Generally there are two types of hydrologic boundaries: physical boundaries and hydraulic
boundaries. Physical boundaries are formed by the presence of a physical impediment to
groundwater flow such an impermeable geologic unit or the truncation/absence of an aquifer.
Hydraulic boundaries are groundwater conditions that impede groundwater movement, such as
a large lake or a groundwater divide. Ideally, model boundaries can be placed along naturally
occurring boundaries such as groundwater divides or surface water bodies. However, this is
not always feasible.
Figure 4 presents the aquifer boundaries and how they were represented in the model. The
western edge of the modeled area corresponds to the exposure of the Qva aquifer in the cliffs
along Puget Sound and where the Qva drops to sea level and is bounded by Puget Sound (in
the extreme southwest corner of the model area). In the real world, this is a discharge bounda-
ry for the Qva aquifer. Water in the aquifer discharges through springs, as evapotranspiration to
vegetation on the bluffs, and (where the boundary is below sea level) as underf low into Puget
Sound. In the model, we've represented the western boundary with drain s4, set with relatively
low conductance values along areas where minor seepage occurs and with relatively high con-
ductance values at points were streams emanate from the exposed Qva aquifer. The most
prominent of these is Deer Creek (which emanates from Deer Creek Springs), but also includes
(to the north of Deer Creek) Shell Creek, Shelleberger Creek, and an unnamed creek.
A similar aquifer boundary occurs in the southeast corner of the model area where Lyon Creek
has eroded down to and through the base of the Qva. Here water discharges from the aquifer
as springs, seepage, and evapotranspiration above the creek. Again, this natural discharge
boundary is represented in the model with drains.
Within the modelled area, there are a number creeks and lakes which are bedded in the Qva, or
are in other ways in hydraulic continuity with the Qva (bedded in Qyal or Qvr materials that are
in direct contact with the Qva). These include the before mentioned streams on the northwest
and southeast sides of the model as well as Hall Creek, McAleer Creek, Hall Lake, and Lake
Ballinger in the interior of the model. Where streams and lakes are in direct continuity with the
aquifer, groundwater discharge or recharge naturally occurs depending on the head relationship
4 A drain is a model condition that allows water to flow out of the model if the groundwater level in the model cell
containing the drain exceeds the drain's assigned elevation. The amount of flow out of the drain is controlled by a
conductance value assigned to the drain as well as the groundwater elevation. Drains are often used to model
springs and groundwater seepage. Drains only allow water to exit (discharge) from a model and not to enter (re-
charge).
Page 6 1686-007A Robinson No Packet Pg. 132
9.2.b
of the surface water and the groundwater. These surface water bodies are represented in the
model as general head boundaries'.
The natural real -world northern, southern, and eastern boundaries of the Qva aquifer system
are not present within the study area. In order to keep the size of the model reasonable, these
distant boundaries are represented in the model as groundwater streamlines. Streamlines rep-
resent a direction of groundwater flow (flow line) within an aquifer. Within the project area, flow
in the aquifer in the northern and southern portions of the modeled area is generally east -west.
Because these areas are distant from the portion of the model that will be affected by modeled
production from the 228th Street wellfield, it is very unlikely that there is any significant contri-
bution of flow into the aquifer from either the north or south sides of these streamlines. There-
fore, in the model, they are represented by no -flow boundaries placed parallel to the general
flow direction.
Such no -flow boundaries are conceptually valid for the model as long as no modeled stresses
are placed near the boundaries that would alter the direction of the natural flow lines that are
essentially parallel to the boundaries. Consequently, the northern, southern and eastern model
boundaries, were also purposely located a significant distance away from the main areas of in-
terest, namely the Deer Creek Springs and 228th Street wellfield source areas. This was done
specifically to minimize any significant boundary effect in these areas of the model. In the
model, flow is generally parallel to these boundaries except for near the lower reaches of Hall
Creek. However, this area is distant enough from the area of interest that it does not likely im-
pact the model results.
2.2.2.3 General Flow System
The final step in developing a conceptual model is to define the general flow system. This es-
sentially amounts to diagraming the basic pathways by which water enters, passes through,
and exits the model. Figure 2 presents the conceptual model that was developed for this pro-
ject, which diagrams the various flow pathways in cross-section view.
As shown on Figure 2, water enters the system primarily as precipitation. When precipitation
falls on the land surface, only a portion of it actually infiltrates into the ground. The portion that
is not infiltrated may flow overland as runoff or evaporate back to the atmosphere. Runoff may
be infiltrated further down -slope or flow overland out of the model area. A portion of the water
that infiltrates into the ground may be taken up through the roots of plants and trees and tran-
spire back to the atmosphere through their leaves. Typically, the combined effects of evapora-
tion and plant transpiration are considered together as evapotranspiration. That portion of water
that infiltrates into the ground and is able to replenish the aquifer system is referred to as re-
charge. Recharge is always a percentage of the total precipitation value and varies from place
to place depending on specific conditions (i.e. plant cover, temperature, soil permeability, etc.).
For this study, recharge is largely a function of the surficial geology. For the surface areas
mapped with Qvt (see Figure 3), because the Qvt has relatively low permeability, recharge
rates are fairly low and much of the precipitation that falls on these areas flows overland as
runoff. Conversely, because the Qva is fairly permeable, in areas where the Qva is exposed at
5 General -head boundaries are model conditions that allow water to flow out of the model (discharge) if the ground-
water level in the model cell containing the general -head boundary exceeds the assigned boundary elevation or
into the model (recharge) if the groundwater level is lower than the assigned boundary elevation. The amount of
flow into or out of the boundary is controlled by a conductance value assigned to the drain as well as the
groundwater elevation.
Robinson Noble, Inc. 1686-007A Packet Pg. 133
9.2.b
land surface, infiltration (and recharge) is significantly higher. Furthermore, much of the precipi-
tation that runs off in the Qvt covered areas is readily infiltrated when it reaches areas of ex-
posed Ova. Additional recharge occurs where streams (or lakes) have losing reaches (when
streams lose water through infiltration into the ground).
As shown on Figure 2, groundwater that reaches the Ova aquifer flows primarily horizontally
down -gradient through the aquifer. This occurs because the underlying Qtb has a very low
permeability compared to the Ova, which impedes downward migration of water. As with most
confining units, there is some vertical leakage from the Ova aquifer downward through the Qtb.
However, it is minor and is not considered a significant out -flow for this modeling project.
Aside from minor leakage to the underlying Qtb, groundwater exits the Ova aquifer through one
of several routes. As shown on Figure 2, groundwater may be extracted from the system
through production withdrawal from a well (i.e. the 22811 Street wellfield). It may also flow out
of the system through one of the major springs (i.e. Deer Creek Springs), it may exit the sys-
tem as minor seepage through the Ova exposures in the cliffs along the west side and south-
east corner of the model, it can become stream (or lake) flow in gaining reaches, or it can be
discharged into Puget Sound (which is not shown on Figure 2 and only occurs in the extreme
southwestern corner of the model area).
2.2.3 Numerical Model Construction
The numerical groundwater model developed for this project was constructed using the De-
partment of Defense Groundwater Modeling System (GMS). GMS is a comprehensive graph-
ical user program that serves as a pre- and post -processing interface for a variety of groundwa-
ter modelling and analytical programs. For this project, GMS was used to interface with MOD -
FLOW, which is an open -source and widely utilized finite -difference groundwater model' devel-
oped and distributed by the USGS (Harbaugh, 2005). The model developed for this project was
constructed as a steady-state groundwater model'.
2.2.3.1 Numerical Model Inputs
Once a conceptual model is developed, the initial step for constructing the numerical model is
to create a finite difference grid to cover the horizontal (aerial) and vertical space to be modeled.
The horizontal model area for this project is shown on Figure 4, which covers the area within
the model boundaries previously described in Section 2.2.2.2. Figure 4 also shows the finite
difference grid (grid) used for the final model. As shown on Figure 4, horizontal dimensions of
the individual grid cells are refined around the two primary source areas (Deer Creek Springs
and the 2281h Street wellfield) to provide more detail in the near -field areas around these two
sources. The horizontal dimension of the cells adjacent to the two sources is 50 feet square.
The cell size was increased at increments of 10% away from the source areas to a maximum
cell size of 250 feet square. The horizontal elements of the model are geographically referenced
to NAD83/UTM Zone 101.
For the vertical space, the model utilizes a single layer of grid cells (a one -layer model) to repre-
sent the Ova aquifer flow system. Because the Qvt is unsaturated, it is not necessary to set up
a separate layer to represent the till because there is no flow within the Qvt to simulate. As
6 The finite difference approach utilizes a grid system to represent individual flow cells, which are hydraulically
(mathematically) connected to surrounding cells and manipulated together to simulate a flow system.
7 In a steady-state groundwater model, the magnitude and direction of flow is constant with time, versus a transient
model where the magnitude and direction of flow varies with time. For a steady-state model, the volume of wa-
ter within the model domain is constant (flow into the model is equal to the flow out of the model).
"The North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)/Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Zone 10; EPSG:26910.
Page 8 1686-007A Robinson No packet Pg. 134
9.2.b
discussed previously in Section 2.2.2.3, leakage through the underlying Qtb is negligible, and
the top surface of the Qtb was used to represent the base of the model. Cell elevations for the
top of the model were incorporated into the model by importing LIDAR9 data available for the
study area. Cell elevations for the base of model were derived by importing and interpolating
data from a combination of sources, including published USGS maps of the top surface of the
Qtb (Thomas, et al, 1997), the elevations of the exposed contact between the Qtb and the Ova
(Minard, 1983), and several cross sections that traverse the study area generated by King Coun-
ty during the construction of the Brightwater sewer tunnel (King County, 2003).
Once the model grid was established, additional model inputs were incorporated into the mod-
el. The elevations of the drains and general -head boundaries shown on Figure 4 were set re-
spectively to the mapped elevations along the Qtb/Qva contact and the mapped elevations of
the streams and lakes bedded in the Qva (see Section 2.2.2.2). There are no established con-
ductance values for the drains and general -head boundaries for the study area. As such, some-
what arbitrary conductance values were initially set for these features, and these values were
adjusted during the calibration process. Initial conductance values for the drains corresponding
to major springs (i.e. Deer Creek Springs) were set relatively high as compared to the other
drain features without obvious discharge points. Similar proportions were maintained during the
calibration process.
As discussed in Section 2.2.2.3, recharge is largely a function of surficial geology, with highest
recharge occurring in areas where the Qva is exposed at the surface, and lessor recharge oc-
curring in areas covered by the Qvt. Aerial recharge values were applied to the model using this
assumption by creating aerial cove rag e-polygons10 corresponding to the areas mapped as Qvt
and Qva (Minard, 1983). During monitoring efforts conducted by Robinson Noble between 2004
and 2010 (see Section 2.2.1), it was established that the average annual precipitation for the
study area is approximately 37 inches/year. This is in agreement with other area studies (see
Section 2.2.1). Regression analyses conducted by the USGS (Woodward, et al, 1995) and other
information provided specifically for Snohomish County (Thomas, et al, 1997) indicate recharge
values of 13 and 26 inches/year, respectively for areas mapped as Qvt and Qva. These values
were applied accordingly to the current model for the areas mapped as Qvt and Qva.
Similar to the recharge, different values of hydraulic conductivity (K) were applied to the model
(again using a series of polygons created in GMS). Pumping test data for the wells constructed
at the 228' Street wellfield (Robinson Noble, 2003, 2015, and 2018) indicate K values of 50
feet/day for the near -field area around the wellfield. Testing of injection wells at the recently
constructed Madrona Elementary School (Shannon & Wilson, 2016), which is located just south
of the 2281" Street wellfield, indicate similar K values of 55 feet/day. These K values were ap-
plied to these two areas of the model accordingly.
Elsewhere, the K values are less known. However, the USGS (Thomas, et al, 1997) indicates
that K values for the Qva in the southwest corner of Snohomish County ranges from 3 to 310
feet/day with a median value of 42 feet/day. This is comparable to the K values established for
the 228' Street wellfield and the Madrona School site. Median K values were initially applied to
all of the areas of the model, save for the areas around the 228t" Street wellfield and the Ma-
drona School site, and then adjusted accordingly during the calibration process (see Section
2.2.3.2). For the final calibrated model, in 24 separate polygons used to designate K values
9 Light imaging, detection, and ranging (LIDAR) is a surveying method that uses lasers to produce high -resolution
digital maps, including topographic maps.
0 GMS utilizes polygons that are created by the user to apply aerial or map -view features such a recharge and hy-
draulic conductivity to groups of cells within the model area.
Robinson Noble, Inc. 1686-007A Packet Pg. 135
9.2.b
across the model area, K values ranged from 10 to 60 feet/day with a median value of 50
feet/day. This is comparable to the K values determined by the USGS for the Qva aquifer in this
portion of Snohomish County.
2.2.3.2 Model Calibration
Following initial model construction, the overall flow pattern simulated using the initial model
inputs was compared to known flow patterns (potentiometric surface maps) developed for the
area by previous workers. These include potentiometric maps created by the USGS (Newcomb,
1952; and Thomas, et al, 1997) and by King County during the construction of the Brightwater
sewer tunnel (King County, 2003). The initial flow pattern simulated by the model was noted to
approximate the general flow patterns and heads (water level elevations) of these other poten-
tiometric maps.
At this point, select model parameters were systematically modified to adjust simulated heads
to approximate observed heads in a series of model observation wells". Select model parame-
ters were also modified to adjust the modelled discharge rate for Deer Creek Springs to approx-
imate actual rates recorded by the District. For this project, the model parameters available for
calibration were limited to drain and general -head conductance values, and the K within the
specified range of values determined by 1997 USGS study (Thomas, et al, 1997). Recharge, the
known areas of K, and various elevation information are considered fixed values and were not
modified during the calibration process.
The final groundwater model was considered calibrated when the simulated heads and dis-
charge rate from Deer Creek Springs were in general agreement with observed conditions. Fig-
ure 5 presents a plot of the calibration results for the observation wells. It should be noted that
the three outliers indicated in red on Figure 5 are for observation wells located along the north-
ern and southern margins of the model, areas where the model might be expected to be less
calibrated due to the boundary conditions. The calibration residuals" for the remaining observa-
tion wells (disregarding the noted outliers) range from -13.1 to 8.7 feet, with a mean residual
value of 1.5 feet and a root mean squared (RMS) error of the residuals of 5.1 (see Table 2). The
calibrated residual value for the flow of Deer Creek Springs is 60 gpm. These are all considered
acceptable calibration values. Figure 6 presents a potentiometric map of the Qva aquifer show-
ing simulated heads that were generated from the final calibrated model.
Table 2: Model Calibration Statistics
Number of Water Level
Mean Error of Water Level
Observations
23
Residuals
1.5
Mean Absolute Error of Water
Root Mean Squared Error of
Level Residuals
3 2
Water Level Residuals
5.1
Deer Creek Springs Observed
Deer Creek Springs Modeled
Deer780
Flow
840 gpm
gpm
2.3 Wellfield and Spring Source WHPA Delineation
Using the calibrated groundwater model, WHPAs were delineated for the 228th Street wellfield
and Deer Creek Springs sources using the MODPATH module of GMS. MODPATH is a particle -
Observation wells are calibration points that are incorporated into the model at the corresponding locations of real -
world wells with recorded water levels.
12 The difference between observed and computed head.
Page 10 1686-007A Robinson No Packet Pg. 136
9.2.b
tracking post -processing prograM13 designed to work directly within MODFLOW (Pollock,
2017). Within the MODPATH interface, a porosity value of 20% was set for the Qva aquifer.
This value, which is near the lower end of typical porosity values for sand aquifers like the Qva
(Heath, 2004), was used to generate conservative WHPAs.
The WHPAs for the 2281h Street wellfield were delineated using a simulated withdrawal rate of
500 gallons per minute (gpm), which is the full instantaneous quantity (Qi) allocated by District's
current water right14. The current allocated annual quantity (Qa) for the water right is 560 acre-
feet/year, so the wellfield can feasibly only be pumped at a maximum continuous rate of 347
gpm without exceeding the allocated Qa. However, there are only minimal deference's be-
tween the WHPAs delineated using a rate of 347 gpm and those delineated using a rate of 500
gpm. Delineation at the higher rate results in slightly larger, more conservative WHPAs for the
wellfield, which is intended to cover all conceivable pumping conditions.
Using MODPATH, particles were introduced at the 2281h Street wellfield and Deer Creek
Springs, and then tracked up -gradient for specified time intervals. Particle tracking at both
sources was conducted for six-month, one-year, five-year, and ten-year intervals. Additional par-
ticle tracking was also conducted using the "to beginning" option in MODPATH to track the
particles to their ultimate origin within the model. This allowed delineation of the entire zone of
contribution for the two sources. MODPATH was then used to convert the particle tracks to
specific time -of -travel capture zones (see Section 2.1) for the two sources. Figure 7 presents
the time -of -travel capture zones (WHPAs) that were delineated for the two sources. In addition
to the standard six-month, one-year, five-year, and ten-year WHPAs, the capture zones that
were calculated for the entire zone of contribution for each of the two sources were used to
define the recommended buffer zones.
3.0 Summary
DOH requires the definition of wellhead protection zones based on travel rates of groundwater
(DOH, 2010). DOH defines five zones for which wellhead protection strategies should be con-
sidered. These include the following:
• The sanitary control area: Typically the 100-foot radius of control around a wellhead or a
spring (WAC 246-290-135).
• Zone 1: The one-year time -of -travel capture zone. Zone 1 also includes an additional six-
month time -of -travel capture zone to focus greater protection on potential viral and microbial
contamination.
• Zone 2: The five-year time -of -travel capture zone.
• Zone 3: The ten-year time -of -travel capture zone.
• The buffer zone: This zone may extend up -gradient of Zone 3 to include the entire zone of
contribution for a given source.
The first four of these zones are required components of a WHPP and define areas requiring
differing levels of response to a contamination event based on the expected time of travel to a
given groundwater source. The buffer zone is considered optional, but is often vital in planning
13 MODPATH mathematically tracks particles from a given source, up -gradient along the flow lines in a MODFLOW
model for a user specified time -frame.
a Water right G1-26021 allocates an instantaneous withdrawal (Qi) of 500 gpm and an annual withdrawal (Qa) of 560
acre-feet/year for the District's 2281h Street wellfield.
Robinson Noble, Inc. 1686-007A P Packet Pg. 137
9.2.b
for comprehensive protection of the supply sources (DOH, 2010). These specific WHPAs, in-
cluding buffer zones, have been delineated for the 22811 Street wellfield and the Deer Creek
Springs sources and are presented in Figure 7.
4.0 Recommendations
The recommended WHPAs, which correspond to the one-year, five-year, and ten-year time -of -
travel zones (Zones 1, 2, and 3, respectively), for both the Deer Creek Springs and the 2281h
Street wellfield are shown on Figure 7. However, the Qva aquifer is a relatively shallow system
which is directly exposed at the surface in many places within the study area and extra protec-
tion is recommended. As such, we also recommend the incorporation of a buffer zone as part
of the WHPAs for both sources. The recommended buffer zones, which incorporate the entire
zone of contribution up -gradient of Zone 3 for both sources, are shown on Figure 7.
Within the recommended WHPAs presented on Figure 7, there is cause for additional concern
in the areas where the Qva is mapped as the surficial geologic unit. Figure 8 presents a compo-
site map that identifies these specific areas. The Qva aquifer has no natural geologic protection
in these locations and is highly vulnerable to impact from various activities that may occur with-
in these areas. As such, additional precautions are warranted for these specific areas.
Additionally, the buffer zone (zone of contribution) for the 228th Street wellfield reaches Hall
Creek (see Figure 8). This indicates that water from Hall Creek directly recharges a portion of
the aquifer that supplies water to the wellfield. Based on the current modeling, water from the
creek will reach the wellfield within an estimated period of about 18 years. It is recommended
that the District interface with any agencies or entities monitoring water quality along this por-
tion of the creek and request that the Department of Ecology and Snohomish County Environ-
mental Health inform the District of any catastrophic pollution events that may occur in this
reach of Hall Creek.
5.0 References
Anderson, M.P., and Woessner, W.W., 1992; Applied groundwater modeling, simulation of
flow and advective transport; San Diego, Academic Press, Inc.
Golder Associates, Inc., 2008; Hydrogeologic conditions, greater Hall Lake, Hall Creek,
3
m
'>
Chase Lake, Echo Lake, Lake Ballinger, and McAleer Creek watershed; Technical Mem-
2
CL
orandum
E,
Harbaugh, A.W., 2005: MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground -water
00
model, the ground -water flow process; U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods
o
6-Al 6
N
N
Heath, R.C., Basic groundwater hydrology, 2004; USGS Water Supply Paper 2220, (revised)
E
King County, Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Wastewater Treatment Division,
2003; Brightwater treatment plant, final environmental impact statement, Appendix 6-B
w
(geology and groundwater)
a
Liesch, B.A., Price, C.E., and Walters, K.C., 1963; Geology and groundwater resources of
c
northwest King County, Washington; Washington State Department of Conservation,
Water Supply Bulletin No. 20. 3 plates
a
Minard, J.P., 1983; Geologic map of the Edmonds East and Edmonds West Quadrangles,
Washington; USGS Miscellaneous Field Studies, Map MF-1541, scale 1:24,000
Page 12 1686-007A Robinson No Packet Pg. 138
9.2.b
Newcomb, R.C., 1952; Groundwater resources of Snohomish County, Washington; USGS
Water Supply Paper 1135. 2 plates
Pace Engineers, Inc., 2009; Olympic View Water & Sewer District, 2009 comprehensive
water system plan
Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc., and Robinson Noble, Inc., 1999; Olym-
pic View Water & Sewer District, Deer Creek water supply protection plan
Pollock, D.W., 2017; MODPATH v7.2.01, A particle -tracking model for MODFLOW; U.S.
Geological Survey Software Release, 15 December 2017
Robinson Noble, Inc., 2003; Olympic View Water & Sewer District, modification and testing
of the 2281 Street production well
Robinson Noble, Inc., 2015; Olympic View Water & Sewer District, 8605 228' Street test
well
Robinson Noble, Inc., 2018; Olympic View Water & Sewer District, construction and testing
of Production Well 2
Shannon and Wilson, Inc., 2016; Hydrogeologic report new Madrona K-8 project, 9300 23611
Street SW, Edmonds, Washington
Thomas, B.E., Wilkenson, J.M., and Embrey, S.S., 1997; The groundwater system and
groundwater quality in western Snohomish County, Washington; USGS Water Re-
sources Investigations Report 96-4312. 9 plates
Washington State Department of Health, 2010; Washington State wellhead protection pro-
gram guidance document; Washington State Department of Health, Environmental
Health Programs, DOH 331-018 (revised)
Woodward, D.G., Packard, F.A., Dion, N.P., and Sumioka, S.S., 1995; Occurrence and quali-
ty of groundwater in southwestern King County, Washington; USGS Water Resources
Investigation Report 92-4098. 4 plates
The statements, conclusions, and recommendations provided in this report are to be exclusively
used within the context of this document. They are based upon generally accepted hydrogeologic
practices and are the result of analysis by Robinson Noble, Inc. staff. This report, and any attach-
ments to it, is for the exclusive use of Olympic View Water & Sewer District. Unless specifically
stated in the document, no warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
Robinson Noble, Inc. 1686-007A P Packet Pg. 139
9.2.b
C
a)
E
C
a)
E
Q
a�
0
U
m
d
L
Q
L
Figures
L
cr
Q
w
�L
L
0
Q
Nd
LPL
C
0
d
C
0
t
d
3
a�
.Q
E
21
O
00
0
N
N
C
a)
E
t
C,1
Q
r�+
C
a)
E
t
V
f�
Q
Packet Pg. 140
t 9.2.b
err r
a
LW- -ion
CU
L
Cr
IL
'7 _ ,Olympic View Water and Sewer District Service Area o
Deer Creek Springs
Vz t ,T-
0' 4000'
1 1
Note: Basemap from PM: MTW Snohomish County
USGS Edmonds August 2018 T 27 N/R 3,4 E
West and East 1686-007A Scale 1" = 4000'
ROBINSON Quadrangles
NOBLE
28th Str6et Wellfield
rl � •'
` t
LOU r
of 0
f
• r
/to _ :.•
Li � ( r •�f S1 �'
Figure
Vicinity Map with Service Are.
c View Water and Sewer Dis
Packet Pg. 141
I 9.2.b I
Model
Boundary
Runoff
Qvt Infiltration
1G1 Precipitation
v v-
Qvt
Spring --
Discharge Flow Direction
Puget Sound
Well
Discharge
Qtb
Precipitation
i Infiltration
_ ' _ - --
Qva
LeaKage
Model
Boundary
Qvt
Stream
Water Table
❑ PM: MTW Snohomish County Figure
August 2018 T 27 N/R 3,4E Conceptual Mods,
ROBINSON 1686-007A Drawing Not to Scale
NOBLE Olympic View Water and Sewer Dis
Packet Pg. 142
9.2.b
Legend ,� i - r-- Ovt
Model Boundary 1
Geological Symbols:
Qyal Holocene younger alluvium , -- _ _ _ ' •� _ ~; r �,• -! .. 4)
Qvr Vashon recessional outwash . ' _ T�• .- _ y"%"
QV Vashon till Oc. ' t �' f �•� _ s — jCU
Qva Vashon advance outwash
Qtb Pre-Vashon transitional beds r _i% '.t - • d
w 0"
Oyal
Otb` .,.i.,.r{St Cr
M cc
�-- J.j
CL
low /' 'j' / .�i-•^ `T�■■`n'"'•
00
1f \ 1
- / � �•.:�: _. .�. � : t ,_ - 0.t ire �� \�•.-• t �L� Oib ovt . �Tcc
ow
\ M
ow-
i r
it OyaI .- r v
OVS —t I 0% stil C,
E
! ao
0' 3200' Oar
a
E
Ova (i v
Note: Geological PM: MTW Snohomish County Figure 2
Map from Minard August 2018 T 27 N/R 3,4 E Q
1983 USGS 1686-007A Scale 1" = 3200' Surficial Geology Mah.
ROBINSON Edmonds East and
NOBLE West Quadrangles Olympic View Water and Sewer Dis '
Packet Pg. 143
9.2.b
380
360
340
320
�
300
a)
a)
az
280
E
0
U
WZ&I
OWzrl]
220
200
♦ Model Observation Well
♦ Outlier
Perfect Correspondence
--------------------------------------------------------------------
200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380
Observed Head (feet)
PM: MTW
ROBINSON August 2018
NOBLE 1686-007A
i,
Figure 5 r
Model Calibration a
Olympic View Water and Sewer District: 2018 WHPA
Packet Pg. 145
Legend
Water Sources
Groundwater Contours
Groundwater Flow Direction
Model Boundary
Credk Spri
1
1
' 3200' - .. . -
i
Note: Basemap from PM: MTW Snohomish County
USGS Edmonds August 2018 T 27 N/R 3,4 E
West and East 1686-007A Scale 1" = 3200'
ROBINSON Quadrangles
NOBLE
� 3 •
9.2.b
i
Figure
Potentiometric Contour Ma.
)ic View Water and Sewer Dis '
Packet Pg. 146
Figure
Potentiometric Contour Ma.
)ic View Water and Sewer Dis '
Packet Pg. 146
I 9.2.b I
`\`�� '3 Legend
-T•
• . ' • • L J 6 Month Travel Time Zone
Rd ra 1.
1 'f Zone 1 (1 Year Travel Time Zone)
`� Zone 2 (5 Year Travel Time Zone) �
\'N I f : '� ; ~' ` / L J Zone 3 (10 Year Travel Time Zone) t
r• ♦ • .. 1 ►� - 1 - •• .. LJ Buffer Zone F)
♦ I� 1 i
s 11 , • �' Water Sourceslp
i
Edw4wds Ill%,,- • ' r;'. I •r Olympic View Water and Sewer District Service Ar 3
Cr
lip
• - \`
• - • f
CL
CU
228t at Wellf�el ; f t / • • •`` / /
Deer Creek
r %-,.Springs,./
�w a�
�,� ,:sue��.it ) ` — I >j•''�: • ~ `. 2
cra
00
110,
_4 E
09 2060 ! •� �' i r ram,
�'. E
s
Note: Basemap from PM: MTW Snohomish County Figure 2
USGS Edmonds August 2018 T 27 N/R 3,4 E Q
West and East 1686-007A Scale 1" = 2000' Well Head Protection Area Mah.,
ROBINSON Quadrangles
NOBLE Olympic View Water and Sewer Dis '
Packet Pg. 147
9.2b
23 ' _._._ _- .. .• Legend
•'
L J 6 Month Travel Time Zone
J.dm t] 8 ` - Zone 1 (1 Year Travel Time Zone)
{111 V9/ Zone 2 (5 Year Travel Time Zone)CU
8�
• ��```` -`, , �•_. •l i . -, t� 7 �"* _ Y, �`': w L J Zone 3 (10 Year Travel Time Zone)
+"• I • .• L J BufferZone d
�K % • .Z 1 a (', I I1 i i ,; Water Sources
Edwards. t 1 r 1I .�• Additional Protection Areas for Exposed Qva Aquii 3
A� Sark Tft
Olympic View Water and Sewer District Service Ar Cr
. t '�• • T,IMs t
1. sit
'�• - •� - 2
1 ! CL
CU
,.dam', • •i ' C�
• - Imo. _'�� ..�� WHPA
- ••�� Influenced 1 M
r.. _ •.� —.. j Hall Creek
`-Deer Creek ..:..,
,Springs ...... ` �'
;_• 1 °'
117
l 4 • •
Of T4
ban Wells' . ' r • .-� •. 00
tit Wtta r►►a► <"
�� !. i I 1•, , �. - '. •� - t. Ballinger N
eF: �•C 'Nc�jHOMimi
• \ 6
-Una cc
is ` •
��— Note: Basemap from PM: MTW Snohomish County Figure 2
USGS Edmonds August 2018 T 27 N/R 3,4 E Q
West and East 1686-007A Scale 1" = 2000' Additional Protection Area
ROBINSON Quadrangles
NOBLE Olympic View Water and Sewer Dis'
Packet Pg. 148
9.2.c
Well
Surface
-
Water table
Aquifer
Impermeable rock
lnuitpw Rp-charnt:
:qLA 119 1 ii i 177 M. 7':
Packet Pg. 149
Agenda
• Purpose of stormwater regulations in CARA
• OVWSD WHPAs
• How is Stormwater Managed in Edmonds
• Stormwater Management in Southwest Edmonds
Drainage Basins — Special Case
• What is an Underground Injection Control (UIC)
well?
• CARA proposal for Risk -based approach for
managing stormwater in WHPAs
• Questions
Purpose
Proposed stormwater management requirements
were developed to:
1. Meet the intent of the CARA:
To minimize loss of recharge quantity, to maintain the
protection of supply wells for public drinking water,
and to prevent contamination of groundwater.
2. Provide flood protection for Edmonds
residents & businesses
3. Meet all our Dept of Ecology stormwater
Permit Requirements
Qr
38TH ST SW
Cl
9z
!1J
Z
Q
J
W
m
G
T
0
Gs.
'V 4 V
;%j
228t" St Wellfield
J
a
s
Deer Creek Springs
EDMONDS
SHORELINE
11
> Q 1
1
> z
Q Q 1
E$PERAWE _
EDMONDS Q`
f � i
0
4 q
238TH ST SW P
s
1
`Vt `
y
J
1
F')MONDS WAY
244TH !, • KING COUNTY LAKE BALLffYGER W/
SHORELINE
Packet Pg. 152
Managing
Stormwater
most of
Edmonds
RUNOFF
FROM
ROOF
STREET
RUNOFF
OF
I_
BMP
--GUTTER
Mir •
�1-
L
`LAWN
RUNOFF
STREET
RUNOFF
1�ilr'
0
ko!
i
{
9.2.c
b
i
o 0
0
U
Intersection of
100th Ave W &
238th St SW
L
goo
Q
M
N +IJ
O N
O �All
D
R a
9
W.-
If
.•
g�
w
- � a
- 0 c
0E
a
•—• • 0 cG
Packet Pg. 154
9.2.c
:I@rleII@t•■►`IIr•»1ILT17rrI[_
M■u,� 'Mak u �■� "mob, Am i!
a FIIUF]Ub Dab! rib I
L
Q
d
L
t
NN�
L7�
L
.3
INFILTRATION INFILTRATION '
GALLERY TRENCH 1
M
N
Ground LO
N
0
Street surface
.y
L
rt+
Q. 0. Q'. 1. _ 3
o
Distributioncs i �� •
PP !ice y
infiltration
infiltration ation
If .
Vadose Zone
E
s
a
Packet Pg. 155
•
f
to
j
LA
9.2.c
Intersection
100th Ave W
7 Z Qth c+ CIA/ o
U
L
Q
w
Li
M
N
N
O
Tmm
d
N
•, , Packet Pg. 156
What is a n Underground Injection Cori--_
• A bored, drilled, or driven shaft whose depth
is greater than the largest surface dimension;
• A subsurface fluid distribution system
(Stormwater Infiltration System) that include
an assemblage of perforated pipes, drain
tiles, or other similar mechanisms intended to
distribute fluids below the surface of the
ground.
Aquifer
d
0
U
m
d
L
a
Q
L
LL
L
d
a
76
•L
U
M
N
LO
N
O
N
d
.y
L
W
3
E
L
0
M
C
d
E
t
V
fC
w
rr
Q
C
d
E
t
a
Packet Pg. 158
Risk Factors for Stormwater Management in WHPA
1. Land Use
2. Type of stormwater control
3. Vadose Zone treatment
capacity
Risk Factors for Stormwater Management in WHPAs
1. Land Use
VI
Hwy 99/Commercial Single-family residential
Low Risk
Risk Factors for Stormwater Management in WHPAs
2. Type Stormwater Control
Bored, drilled, or
driven shaft UIC
igh Rise_
�if11•� �- •_-i .l
Infiltration trench
Low Risk
3. Vadose Zone Treatment Capacity
CARA proposal for Risk -based approach for managing stormwater.
228thSt Welffield - High Risk Due to Land Use
• All UICs prohibited —High risk
• All other stormwater infiltration BMPs prohibited
• Other feasible means of managing stormwater
Deer Creek Springs - Low Risk Due to Land Use
• Prohibited: All new bored, drilled, or driven shaft UICs -High Risk
• Allowed (Low risk stormwatercontrols/Low Risk Land Use):
• Infiltration trenches w/pipes (UIQ
• Must treat stormwater stricter than per Ecology Stormwater
manual before infiltrating (will be stormwater regulations)
• No other feasible means of managing stormwater
Stormwater Infiltration Systems in WHPAs
Basis:
• 2019 Ecology - Stormwater Management Manual for Western
Washington (SWMMWW) Volume I, Chapter 4 (UIC Wells)
• Discussions with Nikki Guillot, WA Dept. Of Health
• OVWSD - 2018 Watershed Protection Plan.
Result:
• The proposed requirements for infiltrating storm water in
WHPAs more restrictive than Ecology 2019 SWMMWW to
meet the intent of the CARA ordinance.
9.2.c
Pollutant Loadine Risk
Assumed Treatment Capacity
Low
Pretreatment
Remove Solids
Remove Oil &
Solids
None (Qva)
Remove Solids
Remove Solids
Remove Oil &
Solids
Packet Pg. 166
Stormwater Infiltration Systems in WHPAs
Summary•
• All bored., drilled,, or driven shaft UICs prohibited in
WHPAs (including "holes" and "sinkholes").
• Infiltration only means of managing stormwater in
SW Edmonds basins A & B.
• Proposed requirements for stormwater infiltration
are more protective of aquifers than current
Ecology requirements.
• Should Ecology update the requirements in the nex
SWMMWW, they will be adopted automatically, if
more protective than the proposed requirements
9.3
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Council Affirmation of Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
Council approved a Code of Conduct on January 26, 2021 (attached). This Code of Conduct states that
councilmembers will review and re -affirm the Code of Conduct annually.
The Code of Ethics (attached) was approved by Council on June 6, 2015, and applies to elected officials
and appointed citizen volunteers serving in an official capacity (i.e. Boards and Commissions).
Recommendation
A motion to affirm the Council Code of Conduct.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
Final Code of Conduct 01-26-21
Code of Ethics
Packet Pg. 169
9.3.a
Section 6. Council Code of Conduct
The City Council finds that Councilmembers should seek to continually improve the quality of
public service and ensure public confidence in the integrity of local government and its
effective, transparent, and equitable operation.
Councilmembers have a public stage and privileged platform to show how individuals with
contrasting points of view can find common ground, demonstrate problem -solving approaches,
and achieve solutions that benefit the community as a whole.
Central to these principles is that civility and decorum shall apply to all Councilmember conduct
in relation to city business.
To this end, the following Code of Conduct for members of the Edmonds City Council is
established:
6.1 General Conduct
A. Councilmembers shall focus discussions and debates on vision, policies, and their
implementation.
B. No Councilmember shall dominate proceedings during Council or other public meetings.
C. Personal, insulting, or intimidating language, body language and actions, are not allowed.
Councilmembers may raise a point of order for ruling by the Chair or by the Body to address
inappropriate remarks.
D. Ensuring that all meeting participants feel welcome is a vital part of the democratic process.
No signs of partiality, prejudice, or disrespect should be evident on the part of Councilmembers
toward any individual participating in a public meeting. Every effort should be made to be
respectful in listening to Council, staff and public testimony and discussions.
E. Technology allows words written or said to be distributed far and wide. Councilmember
written notes, voicemail messages, texts, email, or other electronic communications, are public
records and shall follow this code.
6.2 Conduct with City Staff and the Council Legislative Assistant
The community is best served when the abilities, experience, and knowledge of staff and
contract employees work alongside councilmembers, and councilmembers will value these
resources and relationships by:
A. Using respectful language and avoiding aggressive tones.
B. Whenever possible, provide questions ahead of public meetings and otherwise avoid
surprises.
C. Recognize that calls and emails may not be returned outside of business hours.
Packet Pg. 170
9.3.a
D. Expressing concerns about performance only to the Mayor, in the case of staff, and the
Council President, in the case of Council legislative aide.
E. Understanding that Council, as a legislative body, directs City business via policy change
initiated by majority Council vote only; councilmembers acting individually shall refrain from
directing staff or otherwise intruding on the City's administrative functions.
6.3 Conduct with Boards, Committees, Commissions, and Outside Agencies
A. The City maintains several boards and commissions as a means of encouraging and gathering
community input. Residents who serve on boards and commissions are a valuable resource to
the City's leadership and shall be treated with appreciation and respect.
B. Councilmembers are appointed as non -voting members to serve as the primary two-way
communication liaison between the Council and boards, commissions, and committees.
Councilmembers are not to direct the activities or work of the board, commission, or
committee.
C. Councilmembers may attend any board or commission meeting to which they are not
appointed but shall do so as a member of the public. Personal comments or positions, if given,
will be identified as such and shall not be represented as the position of the City or Council.
D. Councilmembers shall not contact a board or commission member to lobby on behalf of an
individual, business, or organization, with the exception of the hearing examiner or
architectural design board. It is acceptable for Councilmembers to contact boards or
commissions and their members, so long as all interactions are in line with the Edmonds Code
of Ethics.
E. When attending a non -city sponsored event, meeting, conference, or other activity,
Councilmembers shall do so in an individual Councilmember capacity only. Likewise, a
Councilmember may be authorized to represent the City only in compliance with RCW
35A.12.100.
6.4 Implementation, Compliance, and Enforcement
As an expression of the standards of conduct that best serve the City, the Code of Conduct is
intended to be self -enforcing and is most effective when members are thoroughly familiar with
it and embrace its provisions.
A. This Council Code of Conduct shall be included in the regular orientations for newly seated
Councilmembers. Members entering office shall sign a statement affirming they read and
understood the City of Edmonds Council Code of Conduct.
B. The Code of Conduct shall be reviewed and reaffirmed annually by the City Council.
Packet Pg. 171
9.3.a
C. When a breach of this code occurs, Councilmembers are encouraged to remind one another
of the Code of Conduct terms. These communications may be documented with the subject
line, "Code of Conduct Reminder."
D. Repeated breaches, or egregious instances, may be dealt with according to the terms set out
in the Council's adopted Robert's Rules of Order or other applicable laws and regulations.
Packet Pg. 172
9.3.b
CODE OF ETHICS
The purpose of the Edmonds Code of Ethics is to strengthen the quality
of government through ethical principles which shall govern the conduct
of elected officials and appointed citizen volunteers serving in an official
capacity (i.e. Boards and Commissions).
We shall:
• Be dedicated to the concepts of effective and democratic government.
• Affirm the dignity and worth of the services rendered by government and
maintain a sense of social responsibility.
• Be dedicated to the highest ideals of honor and integrity in all public and
personal relationships.
• Recognize that the chief function of local government at all times is to serve
the best interest of all the people.
• Keep the community informed on municipal affairs and encourage
communications between the citizens and all municipal officers. Emphasize
friendly and courteous service to the public and each other; seek to improve
the quality of public service, and confidence of citizens.
• Seek no favor; do not personally benefit or profit by confidential information
or by misuse of public resources.
• Conduct business of the city in a manner which is not only fair in fact, but
also in appearance.
Approved by the Edmonds City Council on 06-02-2015.
Packet Pg. 173
9.4
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Ordinance to Conform Code to Salary Commission
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
The Salary Commission, as authorized by City Ordinance 4252 and ECC Chapter 10.80, is a five -member
commission that meets every other (odd) year (beginning in 2023) to review and make binding salary
and benefits recommendations for the City's elected positions of Mayor and Council.
Recommendation
Approve the proposed code amendments to acknowledge the current existence of the Salary
Commission, as they have the authority to increase or decrease the salary of elected officials.
Narrative
The salary of the mayor is referenced in ECC 2.01.050, and the additional compensation paid to the
council president is referenced in ECC 1.02.031.
A minor update to these codes will more clearly address the salary of the mayor and council president
are established by the Salary Commission.
Attachments:
2024-01-18 Ordinance to conform code to salary commission v2
Packet Pg. 174
9.4.a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS CITY CODE
TO ADDRESS THE 2022 REESTABLISHMENT OF A
SALARY COMMISSION AND REFLECTING THE
COMMISSION'S IMPACT ON MAYOR AND COUNCIL
PRESIDENT PAY.
WHEREAS, as a means of preventing the use of public office for self -enrichment, the
Washington State Constitution, Article 11, Section 8, initially prohibited any changes in the pay
applicable to an office having a fixed term, either after the election of that official or during his
or her term; and
WHEREAS, by Article 30 (Amendment 54), adopted in 1967, and an amendment to
Article 11, Section 8 (Amendment 57) in 1972, the rule was modified to permit pay increases for
officials who do not fix their own compensation; and
WHEREAS, the State Legislature adopted RCW 35.21.015 to provide the ability for city
councilmembers and commissioners to receive mid-term compensation increases, provided that a
local salary commission was established and that the commission set compensation at a higher
level; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.21.015 authorizes the creation of a salary commission of city
residents that may increase the salary of elected officials effective mid-term, and decrease the
salary of elected officials effective upon subsequent terms of office, by filing a change in salary
to the city clerk without further action of the city council; and
WHEREAS, the Edmonds City Council has established, repealed, and reestablished a
salary commission at various times over the years with the following ordinances: Ordinance
3275 (establishing a salary commission in 1999); Ordinance 3508 (repealing and reenacting a
salary commission in 2004); Ordinance 3975 (repealing the salary commission in 2014);
Ordinance 4057 (adopting a salary commission in 2017); Ordinance 4223 (repealing a salary
commission in 2021); and Ordinance 4252 (adopting a salary commission in 2022); and
Packet Pg. 175
9.4.a
WHEREAS, outside of chapter 10.80 ECC, the city code should be drafted to
acknowledge the current existence of the salary commission and any future comings and goings
of the salary commission; and
WHEREAS, certain provisions of the city code address the salary of the mayor and
council president without acknowledging the current existence of the salary commission; and
WHEREAS, the city code is silent on the compensation of council members who are not
the council president;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 1.02.031 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Council President," is
hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
The council president shall be elected for a one-year term by the city council at
the first council meeting of each year and shall serve until his or her successor is
elected at the first council meeting of the next year; provided, that, in years when
the composition of the city council will not change in the forthcoming year, either
because it was not an election year or because all incumbents were reelected, the
council president for the forthcoming year may be elected at the last meeting of
the year preceding the start of the president's term, in which case the president's
term shall begin on January 1 st of the forthcoming year.
A. At the same meeting that the council president is elected, the city
council shall elect a council president pro tempore who shall serve in the absence
of the council president. In the event that both the council president and president
pro tempore are unavailable, the council president shall appoint a member of the
council to fulfill his/her duties while both are unavailable.
B. In addition to any other duties assigned by the city council, the council
president shall have the following responsibilities:
1. Assign members of the city council as members and liaisons to boards,
commissions, and committees, and otherwise supervise the committee system;
2. Formulate and prepare the agenda for city council meetings; and
Packet Pg. 176
9.4.a
3. Supervise and direct the activities of any staff whose primary
responsibility is to support the city council.
C. In addition to the salary as a member of the city council, the council
president shall be entitled to receive additional compensation not to exec
$200 00 per- ri.e as established by the salary commission created pursuant to
RCW 35.21.015. If no salary commission has established the additional
compensation to be paid to the council president, then the council president shall
be paid in accordance with the salary commission determination that was most
recently in effect.
Section 2. Section 2.01.050 of the Edmonds City Code, entitled "Salary," is hereby
amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in
The mayor shall receive a salary in such amount
time time establish by or-d ranee as established by the salary commission
created pursuant to RCW 35.21.015. If no salary commission has established the
compensation to be paid to the mayor, then the mayor shall be paid in accordance
with the salary commission determination that was most recently in effect.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this
ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of
the remaining portions of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance is subject to referendum and shall take effect
thirty (30) days after final passage of this ordinance.
APPROVED:
MAYOR MIKE ROSEN
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
Packet Pg. 177
9.4.a
C
JEFF TARADAY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.
Packet Pg. 178
9.4.a
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
of the City of Edmonds, Washington
On the day of , 2024, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed
Ordinance No. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting
of the title, provides as follows:
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE EDMONDS CITY
CODE TO ADDRESS THE 2022 REESTABLISHMENT
OF A SALARY COMMISSION AND REFLECTING
THE COMMISSION'S IMPACT ON MAYOR AND
COUNCIL PRESIDENT PAY.
The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request.
DATED this day of 92024.
4840-7251-8158, v. 1
5
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
Packet Pg. 179
9.5
City Council Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 01/23/2024
Resolution Providing 2024 Workplan Prioritization to Planning Board
Staff Lead: City Council
Department: City Council
Preparer: Beckie Peterson
Background/History
On January 16, the Planning Board presented to Council an update and included their projected 2024
workplan, and requested that Council provide guidance to the prioritization for their work.
Recommendation
Adopt the resolution, and direct Council staff to send to the Planning Board's chair.
Narrative
Following the Planning Board presentation, councilmembers each discussed their priorities of the
Planning Board's 2024 project workload. This resolution reflects the compilation of these comments,
and summarizes the Council's top priorities as Climate Action Plan Integration, Land Use, Multi -Family
Design Standards and Housing/Housing Development Codes.
Attachments:
Resolution Planning Board 2024 1.18.2024
Packet Pg. 180
9.5.a
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL
PROVIDING DIRECTION AND 2024 WORKPLAN
PRIORITIZATION TO THE PLANNING BOARD
WHEREAS, the Planning Board is established and codified in Title 10, ECC Chapter 10.40,
consistent with RCW 35.63, and serves in an advisory capacity to the mayor and city council in
regional and local planning, including the development and review of the comprehensive plan;
and
WHEREAS at the City Council meeting on January 16, 2024, the Planning Board presented a
periodic update including the board's projected 2024 workload and requested Council's guidance
of the prioritization of their work; and
WHEREAS, Councilmembers generally agreed to direct topic areas to other citizen groups to
work with staff and consultants to vet them, instead of the Planning Board. Examples are
Economic Development, Transportation, and Parks; and
WHEREAS, this Council prioritizes support for the adopted Comprehensive Vision Statement
and meaningful public participation in the process for the below stated priorities; and
WHEREAS, both parking and multi -modal transportation are recognized components of the land
use, transportation, and economic development sections for the comprehensive plan, and
similarly, that the waterfront and shorelines deserve emphasis and consideration in our climate
action and park planning; and
WHEREAS, we recognize the distinct character of each of our subareas and the opportunity to
develop that character further; and
WHEREAS, guidance from the State of Washington on implementing regulations concerning
Detached Additional Dwelling Units is still forthcoming, council supports progress "with caution
and care"; and
WHEREAS, Council appreciates Planning Board efforts to manage time and workload evenly
throughout the year, and we further appreciate their expertise, volunteer time, and efforts on
behalf of our wonderful City;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Edmonds City Council establishes the
following items as the highest priority for Planning Board vetting and recommendations in
Calendar year 2024:
1. Climate Action Plan Integration
2. Land Use
3. Multifamily Design Standards
4. Housing/Housing Development Codes
Packet Pg. 181
9.5.a
RESOLVED this day of January 2024.
CITY OF EDMONDS
MAYOR, MIKE ROSEN
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
0
A
a�
v
N
O
N
co
T"
Packet Pg. 182