Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2024-03-26 Council Packet
2 of c�,y s Agenda Edmonds City Council REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 250 5TH AVE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 MARCH 26, 2024, 7:00 PM PERSONS WISHING TO JOIN THIS MEETING VIRTUALLY IN LIEU OF IN -PERSON ATTENDANCE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING AUDIENCE COMMENTS CAN CLICK ON OR PASTE THE FOLLOWING ZOOM MEETING LINK INTO A WEB BROWSER USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE: HTTPS://ZOOM. US/J/95798484261 OR COMMENT BY PHONE: US: +1 253 215 8782 WEBINAR ID: 957 9848 4261 THOSE COMMENTING USING A COMPUTER OR SMART PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO RAISE A VIRTUAL HAND TO BE RECOGNIZED. PERSONS WISHING TO PROVIDE AUDIENCE COMMENTS BY DIAL -UP PHONE ARE INSTRUCTED TO PRESS *9 TO RAISE A HAND. WHEN PROMPTED, PRESS *6 TO UNMUTE. WHEN YOUR COMMENTS ARE CONCLUDED, PLEASE LEAVE THE ZOOM MEETING AND OBSERVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING ON THE COUNCIL MEETINGS WEB PAGE. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETINGS BEGINNING AT 7:00 PM ARE STREAMED LIVE ON THE COUNCIL MEETING WEBPAGE, COMCAST CHANNEL 21, AND ZIPLY CHANNEL 39. "WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE ORIGINAL INHABITANTS OF THIS PLACE, THE SDOHOBSH (SNOHOMISH) PEOPLE AND THEIR SUCCESSORS THE TULALIP TRIBES, WHO SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL HAVE HUNTED, FISHED, GATHERED, AND TAKEN CARE OF THESE LANDS. WE RESPECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY, THEIR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION, AND WE HONOR THEIR SACRED SPIRITUAL CONNECTION WITH THE LAND AND WATER. - CITY COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT CALL TO ORDER/FLAG SALUTE LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3. ROLL CALL 4 5. 6 PRESENTATIONS 1. Annual Report - South County Fire and Rescue (30 min) 2. Citizen's Tree Board 2024 Annual Report (20 min) APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AUDIENCE COMMENTS THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT REGARDING ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA AS CLOSED RECORD REVIEW OR AS A PUBLIC HEARING. SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO Edmonds City Council Agenda March 26, 2024 Page 1 THREE MINUTES. PLEASE STATE CLEARLY YOUR NAME AND CITY OF RESIDENCE. 7. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. Claim for Damages for filing (0 min) 2. January Monthly Report (0 min) 3. Council Appointment to a Board/Commission (0 min) 4. Outside Boards and Committee Reports (0 min) 8. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of Committee Meeting Minutes March 12, 2024 2. Approval of Special Meeting Minutes March 12, 2024 3. Approval of claim checks and wire payment. 4. Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. 5. Council Rules of Procedure Sections 3 9. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. Resolution Adopting Traffic Safety Camera Location Analysis (20 min) 2. Resolution Concerning ReEstablishment Workplan of the Edmonds Downtown Business Improvement District (20 min) 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT 10:00 PM Edmonds City Council Agenda March 26, 2024 Page 2 4.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Annual Report - South County Fire and Rescue Staff Lead: Fire Services Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History In 2005, the Washington State Legislature adopted a bill (HB 1756) that requires substantially career fire departments to maintain policy establishing the existence of the fire department, identifying the services provided and the basic organizational structure of the fire department, and the service delivery/response time objectives for the fire department for those emergency services. On November 3, 2009, the City and Fire District entered into an initial agreement for fire and emergency medical services. The agreement was later amended in 2012 to address a fire boat, and again in January 2015. The District and the City analyzed the performance of the agreement during the period of 2010 - 2016 (the "Introductory Period") and determined that it was in their mutual interests to revise and update the Agreement. This agreement, known as the "Restated Agreement" was executed on January 26, 2017. Sections 8.1 and 8.2 of the Restated Agreement outline the reporting and meeting requirements related to the provision of fire and emergency medical services in the City of Edmonds. The District Fire Chief is required to present an annual report covering the previous calendar year to the Edmonds City Council prior to March 1. Within 30 days of the annual report, the Edmonds City Council and Board of Fire District Commissioners are required to convene a joint annual meeting to discuss items of mutual interest related to the Restated Agreement. By mutual agreement, the City and SCF determined the annual report would be scheduled on 3/26, and the joint meeting will be scheduled for 4/23. Staff Recommendation For information only. The presentation is estimated at 30 minutes. The annual report was not available at the time of packet production but will be added to the packet as soon as possible. Narrative South County Fire & Rescue will provide the 2023 comprehensive annual report to the City on fire, paramedical services, training, prevention, and public educational activities. This report is intended to provide our elected officials and the community with a picture of how well the fire department has performed in meeting the adopted response objectives. Attachments: Packet Pg. 3 4.1 2017 Fire District 1 EMS -Fire Agrmt Edmonds Annual Report 2023 RD (003) print copy Packet Pg. 4 4.1.a REVISED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES THIS REVISED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ("Restated ILA") by and between SNOHOMISH COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1, a Washington municipal corporation (the "District') and the CITY OF EDMONDS, a Washington city (the "City") v is for the provision of fire and emergency medical services (EMS). m WHEREAS, a consolidated Fire and EMS service, by a single vendor or through a n Regional Fire Protection Service Authority (RFA), has recently gained support of most elected officials in Southwest Snohomish County; and c WHEREAS, the City and District agree that a long-term agreement between the City and d the District for fire and emergency medical services is beneficial to the City and District and their w stakeholders: and 0 U WHEREAS, on November 3, 2009, the City and District entered into an Interlocal Agreement (the "Agreement') for the District to provide fire and emergency medical services to 0 the City beginning January 1, 2010; � 0 WHEREAS, such Agreement was amended pursuant to a First Amendment dated April 0- d 17, 2012 to address a fire boat; and WHEREAS, such Agreement was amended pursuant to a Second Amendment approved on January 27, 2015; and a WHEREAS, the District and the City are authorized, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 of the E a� Revised Code of Washington, to enter into Interlocal Agreements which allow the District and Q the City to cooperate with each other to provide high quality services to the public in the most m LL efficient manner possible; and do WHEREAS, the parties have analyzed the performance of the Agreement during the w period of 2010 — 2016 (the "Introductory Period") and have determined that is in their mutual •L interests and the interests of their respective stakeholders to revise and update the Agreement; n and WHEREAS, the District and City now wish to revise and restate the Agreement as provided herein; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the City and District hereto agree as follows: 0. DEFINITIONS. The following definitions shall apply throughout this Restated ILA. Packet Pg. 5 4.1.a Adjustment Year: The year in which a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA) is effective between the District and the local chapter of the IAFF. When a new CBA has retroactive effect, the Adjustment Year shall be the date to which the CBA is retroactively applied. For example, if a CBA expires on December 31, 2014 and a new CBA is executed on December 1, 2016 but made retroactive to January 1, 2015, the Adjustment Year would be 2015. b. Assigned: As used in the definitions of Unit Utilization Factor and Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor, the term "Assigned" shall describe the period of time in seconds from dispatch time to clear time, when the Unit becomes available to respond to another call c. City: City of Edmonds. d. City Fire Stations: Fire Station 16, Fire Station 17, and Fire Station 20. e. Commencement Date: January 1, 2010. f. Contract Payment: The amount that the City shall pay to the District pursuant to this Restated ILA. g. District: Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1. Edrnonds Unit: An Edmonds Unit is any Unit based at one of the City Fire Stations with the exception of the Battalion Chief. Effective Date: February 1, 2017. E j. Esperance: "Esperance" refers to the entirety of the contiguous unincorporated area a that is completely surrounded by the City of Edmonds and commonly known as Esperance. U_ rn k. Esperance Offset: The amount of tax revenue and fire benefit charges, if fire benefit w charges are imposed in the future, to be received by the District from Esperance for the year in which the Contract Payment is calculated. The Esperance Offset shall not drop below $1,117,150 (the amount derived by multiplying the 2017 Esperance Assessed 0 Value of $565,469,115 by the District's 2017 tax rate of $1.97561714741 divided by 1,000) even if the actual tax revenue received by the District drops below that amount as LL a result of reductions in assessed valuation or tax rate. The Esperance Offset for any given year shall not exceed $1,117,150, multiplied by the compounded percentage increase in City Station Personnel Costs from 2017 to the year for which the Esperance Offset is being calculated. For example, if City Station Personnel Cost increases 3% from 2017 to 2018 and 4% from 2018 to 2019, the 2019 cap for the Esperance Offset would be $1,197,516 and be calculated as follows: Packet Pg. 6 4.1.a $1,117,150 x 1.03 = $1,150,664 x 1.04 = $1,196,691 I. District Fire Chief: The Fire Chief of Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1. m. Firefighters: Full-time, compensated employees, captains, firefighters, emergency medical technicians, and/or paramedics. Insurance: The term "insurance" as used in this Restated ILA means either valid insurance offered and sold by a commercial insurance company or carrier approved to do business in the State of Washington by the Washington State Insurance Commissioner or valid self-insurance through a self-insurance pooling organization approved for operation in the State of Washington by the Washington State Risk Manager or any combination of valid commercial insurance and self-insurance pooling if both are approved for sale and/or operation in the State of Washington. o. Law: The term "law" refers to state and federal statutes and regulations. Unless expressly identified herein, City ordinances, codes and resolutions shall not be considered "law." Material Breach: A Material Breach means the District's failure to provide minimum staffing levels as described within this Restated ILA, the City's failure to timely pay the Contract Payment as described within this Restated ILA, or the City's or District's failure to comply with other material terms of this Restated ILA. q. Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor: See Exhibit E. E a r. Negotiation Threshold. A designated occurrence or condition that requires the parties Q m to renegotiate the Restated ILA. LL Cl) s. Non -Edmonds Unit: A Non -Edmonds Unit is any Unit stationed at any station other w than the City Fire Stations. t. Transport Balance Factor: See Exhibit E. u. Unit: A Unit is a group of Firefighters that work together and are based at the same station. Where a station is staffed by three firefighters at any one time, that station shall be considered a Unit. Where a station is staffed by five or more firefighters at any one time, without counting the Battalion Chief or Medical Services Officer, that station shall be deemed to have two Units and the District shall clearly allocate the Firefighters at that station in such a manner that the two Units at that station can be clearly distinguished for the purposes of determining the Unit Utilization Factor for each Unit. v. Unit Utilization Factor: See Exhibit E. Packet Pg. 7 4.1.a w. Wind -Up Period: Except in the context of Material Breach as defined in Section 10.2, the two years immediately following notice of termination under 11.2. SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.1 Services Provided. The District shall provide all services necessary for fire suppression, emergency medical service, hazardous materials response, technical rescue, and disaster response (not including an Emergency Operations Center, which is provided by the City at the time of this Restated ILA) to a service area covering the corporate limits of the City of Edmonds. In addition, the District shall provide support services including, but not limited to, fire marshal, fire prevention and life safety, public education, public information, and fleet maintenance, payroll and finances, human resources, and legal and risk management pertaining to the operations and delivery of the District's services. 1.2 Training. Education, and Career Development. The District shall provide training and education to all firefighter and emergency medical service personnel in accordance with State, County and local requirements. Furthermore, the District shall offer professional development and educational and training opportunities for unrepresented and civilian employees. 1.3 City Fire Chief. The District Fire Chief shall be designated as the City Fire Chief for purposes of statutory provisions, regulations and the Edmonds City Code. 1.4 District Fire Chief Designates Fire Marshal. The District Fire Chief shall designate an individual to serve as City Fire Marshal, and shall assign necessary personnel to support E L the functions and needs of the Fire Marshal as mutually agreed to and partially funded Q by the City (See Exhibit A), subject to the City's right to provide its own fire inspectors pursuant to Section 2.8.2, below. LL Cn 2. STANDARDS FOR SERVICES/STAFFING w 2.1 Battalion Chief. A Battalion Chief shall continue to be available for response within the City twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week as during the Introductory Period. The District agrees to provide Incident Command response for all emergency incidents twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week. 2.2 Fire Station Staffing. The City Fire Stations shall each be staffed twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week with a minimum of one (1) fire captain and two (2) firefighters, at least one of whom shall be a firefighter/paramedic. Any increase in staffing above this level shall not increase the Contract Payment unless the increase occurs through an amendment of this Restated ILA. 2.2.1 The parties shall renegotiate this Restated ILA upon the occurrence of any of the following Negotiation Thresholds: 4 Packet Pg. 8 4.1.a a. When the Unit Utilization Factor ("UUF") at any one of the City Fire Stations exceeds 0.250; b. When the Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor ("NUUF") is out of balance as defined in this Restated ILA; PROVIDED THAT this subsection shall not trigger a renegotiation any earlier than January 1, 2018. c. When the Transport Balance Factor (TBF) is out of balance as defined in this Restated ILA, PROVIDED THAT this subsection shall not trigger a renegotiation earlier than January 1, 2018. d. When the Esperance Offset drops by ten percent (10%) or more over any consecutive three (3) year period. 2.2.2 The District shall provide written notice to the City ("Threshold Notice") whenever any of the foregoing Negotiation Thresholds occurs. Within thirty (30) days of issuance of a Threshold Notice, the parties shall meet to renegotiate this Restated ILA. Such negotiations shall include, at least the following topics: (i) Methodologies intended to reduce the UUF substantially below 0.250 or to balance the NUUF or TBF, as applicable (collectively "Remedial Measures"). Remedial Measures may include, but shall not be limited to, changes to the staffing mix and/or levels, adding another Unit; changing fire response plans in CAD, and/or implementing other service changes; and Adjusting the Contract Payment to account for the District's increased a cost in employing the selected Remedial Measures. Where the Threshold Notice pertains to subsection 2.2.1(d), topics of a, negotiation shall include increasing the amount of the Esperance Offset Q m and/or reducing staff and/or reducing overhead charges that are billed to the City. Cn w 2.2.3 The District shall identify various Remedial Measures that are likely to expeditiously achieve the applicable goals in Section 2.2.2(i). The City may opt to L identify and notify the District about alternative Remedial Measures. After consulting with y the District, the City shall select one or more of the Remedial Measures and shall L provide written notice of same within one hundred twenty (120) days following the issuance of the Threshold Notice (the "Negotiation Deadline"). The City's selection shall be subject to mediation under paragraph 18.1 if the District finds the City's selection to N be ineffective or inappropriate, but it shall not be subject to arbitration under paragraph 18.2. Any disputes regarding the cost impacts of the City's selection shall be subject to E the complete Dispute Resolution procedures, and any adjustment to the Contract Payment arising out of the Dispute Resolution Procedures shall be retroactive to the a earlier of the Negotiation Deadline or the date that the Remedial Measures were initially employed. If the City fails to designate one or more Remedial Measures by the Negotiation Deadline, such failure shall be deemed a Material Breach. Packet Pg. 9 4.1.a 2.2.4 The parties shall endeavor to execute an amendment prior to the Negotiation Deadline. If the parties cannot agree upon an amendment to this Restated ILA before the Negotiation Deadline, either party may terminate the Restated ILA pursuant to 11.2, PROVIDED THAT during the ensuing two-year Wind -Up Period, the District shall be authorized to increase service levels at the City Fire Stations as it deems necessary, and FURTHER PROVIDED THAT the marginal increase in the Contract Payment resulting from any such District -imposed service level increases during the Wind -Up Period shall be shared equally by the parties during the Wind -Up Period. 2.3 Shift Arrangements. The City prefers that the following shift arrangements apply to personnel assigned to stations within the City: no Firefighter shall start a 24-hour shift at any of the City Fire Stations if that Firefighter has just completed a 48-hour shift at a City Fire Station or any other fire station in the District without having taken a rest day between shifts. The District commits that it will undertake in good faith; pursuant to Chapter 41.56 RCW, to negotiate successfully for those arrangements, to be implemented. 2.4 Review of Service Delivery Objectives. The parties acknowledge that the service tz delivery objectives adopted in 2006 ("Response Objectives") have never been met in U) their entirety, even when the City had its own fire department. During the Introductory Period, the parties contracted for a particular staffing level at the City Fire Stations. It has a a been recommended that the parties move toward a performance -based contract where W the City pays for a particular level of service that is measured by service delivery 6 objectives (e.g. response time) instead of a particular number of positions. The parties would like to continue to evaluate this recommendation, but acknowledge that it would a take significant additional work to implement such a change, not the least of which includes adoption of achievable performance standards. The City and the District agree a, to work toward adoption of a revised set of service delivery objectives in the first quarter of 2018. 2.4.1 Turnout Time. The District has adopted a standard of 2 minutes and 15 seconds vn w on 90% of all calls. Failure to meet this standard shall not be deemed a Material Breach. If this standard is not being met during calendar year 2017 for the City Fire Stations, the •L District shall provide the City, no later than December 31, 2017, with a report containing y the following information: (i) a list of possible measures that could be implemented to L improve Turnout Time, (ii) the estimated cost of each measure (if reasonably available) and (iii) estimates concerning the amount that turnout time could be reduced with each 0 measure. N 2.5 Reporting. The District agrees to annually report to the City in accordance with chapter 35.103 RCW. In addition to the regular quarterly report content and the content required by law, the annual report shall contain the Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor for each of the following jurisdictions: Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace. The annual report shall contain the total number of seconds that City Fire Stations responded to calls in Woodway and the total number of automatic aid responses from Shoreline into Packet Pg. 10 4.1.a Edmonds. The annual report shall, to the extent practicable, also state the amount of transport fees that the District sought to recover from incidents occurring within the City and Esperance, respectively, and the amount of those fees that were actually recovered. If the District has data that identifies the number of seconds during which two or more Units were Assigned to different calls at the same time, it shall include that data in the annual report. 2.5.1 Quarterly Reporting. In addition, the District shall provide a quarterly report to the City Clerk, no later than 30 days after the end of each quarter. The quarterly report shall contain the Unit Utilization Factor for each of the City Fire Stations, the Transport Balance Factor, as well as the turnout time, travel time, and overall response time. 2.6 [section relocated for clarity] 2.7 Criteria -Based 9-1-1 Dispatch. It is understood and agreed by the City and District that the dispatch of Units during emergencies is determined by criteria -based dispatch protocols of the dispatch centers and Automatic Vehicle Location (AVL). Nothing herein shall require the District to respond first within the City as opposed to other areas served by the District. The City and District recognize that responses to emergencies shall be determined by the District based upon dispatch protocols, the location of available Units and the District's operational judgment, without regard to where the emergencies occur. 2.8 Level of Service Changes. During the term of this Restated ILA, service level changes Er may be mandated that are beyond the control of either party. Additionally, either party may desire to change the service level, including but not limited to, those services a identified in Section 1 Scope of Services and Section 2 Standards for Services/Staffing. When a service level change is mandated by law, adopted by the Edmonds City Council E as part of the City's chapter 35.103 RCW Response Objectives, or is mutually agreed to a by the parties, the City and the District shall renegotiate the Contract Payment at the m request of either party. If the parties are unable to reach agreement within one hundred twenty (120) days after the change is mandated or mutually agreed, the matter shall be vn 2 subject to the complete Dispute Resolution procedures, and any adjustment to the w Contract Payment arising out of the Dispute Resolution Procedures shall be retroactive 2 •L to the date that the service level change was initially employed. Failure of either party to y participate in, or comply with, the Dispute Resolution Procedures in Section 18.1 and/or m 18.2 shall be deemed a Material Breach. 2.8.1 The City acknowledges that the District may be required by law to notify and bargain with the local chapter of the IAFF any level of service changes made pursuant to this section 2.8. 2.8.2 The City reserves the right to remove the Fire Inspector services from this Restated ILA upon one year's written notice to the District, in which case the Contract Payment shall be equitably reduced, PROVIDED THAT in no case shall such notice be provided less than 90 days prior to the beginning of a new fiscal year, AND FURTHER PROVIDED THAT the City shall consult with the District regarding the impacts of a Packet Pg. 11 4.1.a proposed removal of the Fire Inspector services at least 90 days in advance of the City providing such notice , AND FURTHER PROVIDED THAT if the City exercises this option, it shall provide fire inspection services using one or more inspectors with current or previous firefighting experience. 2.9 Response Time Questions. In the event that response times should consistently deviate from the City's Response Objectives, as they may be amended from time to time by the City, the District Fire Chief and the City Mayor, or their designees, shall meet and confer to address the cause, potential remedies, and potential cost impacts. 3. USE OF CITY FIRE STATIONS 3.1 Use of City Fire Stations. The City shall retain ownership of three existing City Fire Stations and shall make them available for use by the District pursuant to the terms set forth in Exhibit B. The parties acknowledge that none of these three fire stations are ideally located and that the City could be better served by two ideally located fire stations. The parties also acknowledge that the internal configuration of the City's three stations contributes to slower turnout times than could be achieved with new stations built according to current standards. In light of the above, the parties contemplate that the City may opt to replace the three current fire stations with two new fire stations for ro , use by the District during the term of this Restated ILA. In the event of a conflict o between the provisions of the Restated ILA and Exhibit B, the provisions of Exhibit B shall control with respect to fire stations and fixtures contained therein, PROVIDED THAT Exhibit B shall be amended in the event that the City moves to a two -station service, and FURTHER PROVIDED THAT nothing in Exhibit B shall be construed to a prevent the City from moving to a two -station service; and FURTHER PROVIDED, that the cost of providing turn key fire stations with equivalent technology to current fire E stations shall be borne entirely by the City. a m L 3.1.1 In the event the City decides to replace or relocate any of the City Fire Stations, the City shall provide notice to the District concerning the location, design and layout of rn w the new City Fire Stations, the time frame for completion, and any other information reasonably requested by the District to plan for the transition. Not later than thirty (30) •L days following such notice, the parties shall meet to discuss the impact of any such v, changes on this Restated ILA and to negotiate an amendment to this Restated ILA to m address such impacts. The parties recognize that there may be initial cost impacts that LL are not ongoing, and the parties agree to negotiate these as well. The parties shall endeavor to execute an amendment no later than one hundred twenty (120) days following such notice to address such initial cost impacts. If the parties cannot agree upon an amendment to this Restated ILA within such time, either party may invoke the E Dispute Resolution procedures. 13 Packet Pg. 12 4.1.a 3.2-3.3 [Completed. Deleted for clarity]' 4 ANNUAL CONTRACT AND TRANSPORT FEES PAYMENT TERMS 4.1 Annual Contract Payment. The City shall pay the District a sum referred to as the Contract Payment for the services provided herein. The annual total amount of the Contract Payment shall be determined according to Exhibit C. The Contract Payment shall be paid in equal monthly installments by the 10" day of each month. Failure to pay monthly installments in a timely manner shall be considered a Material Breach as defined in the Definitions section of this Restated ILA. 4.1.1 If a service level change requiring an adjustment in the Contract Payment occurs on a date other than January 1, the Contract Payment shall be adjusted on the effective date of the service level change, and the monthly installment payments shall be adjusted accordingly. 4.2 Contract Payment Adjustment. Each year, no later than September 1, the District shall submit to the City an invoice for the ensuing year, including any revision to the Contract Payment for the ensuing year. 4.2.1 Annual Percent Increase Based on Labor Costs. The cost of City Station Personnel identified in Exhibit C shall be adjusted annually pursuant to the negotiated a labor collective bargaining agreement between the District and the local chapter of the IAFF (`CBA"); provided that, notwithstanding the actual terms of the CBA, the City 6 Station Personnel cost in Exhibit C shall increase from one labor agreement to the next c no more than the greater of (i) the median increase in the total cost of compensation a (i.e., combined cost of wages and benefits) of comparable fire agencies, (ii) the increase in the Consumer Price Index as measured by the CPI-W Seattle -Tacoma -Bremerton a, metropolitan area for the twelve (12) month period ending June 30, or (iii) the percentage increase in compensation awarded by an interest arbitrator. The phrase L ii "comparable fire agencies" shall refer to a list of comparables agreed upon by the N Employer and Union through the collective bargaining process or the comparables w accepted by an interest arbitrator in an interest arbitration proceeding. 4.2.1.1 The parties recognize that the cost of the District's community paramedic program is currently covered by grants. At the time the grants expire, the City may opt to continue the community paramedic program in which case Exhibit C shall be revised to add an equitable share of the cost of such community paramedics, taking into account the other jurisdictions that are served by the community paramedics. If the City opts not to continue with the program, the community paramedic program will not be continued within the City limits after the grant term ends. ' The Parties acknowledge that a number of actions described in the Agreement have been completed. For clarity and conciseness, those provisions are removed and replaced with the words "Completed. Deleted for clarity." Packet Pg. 13 4.1.a 4.2.2 Adjustment Date Not Met. If a new CBA between the District and IAFF Local 1828 has not been finalized by September 1 of the final year of the then -effective CBA, the City Station Personnel costs and the Indirect Operating Costs for the ensuing year shall be adjusted following execution of the new CBA and shall be retroactive to January 1 of the Adjustment Year. For example, as of the date of this Restated ILA, the last CBA expired on December 31, 2014; thus, the Adjustment Year is 2015. In such instances, the District shall send the City (directed to the City Clerk), no later than September 1 of each year for which a CBA has not yet been executed for the ensuring year, a range within which the Contract Payment for the ensuing year is likely to fall, which range shall be informed by the current status of negotiations between the District and IAFF Local 1828. To enhance the District's ability to provide the City with a predictable range for the Contract Payment, the District shall, to the extent practicable, commence negotiations with IAFF Local 1828 no later than July 1 s' of any year in which a CBA is expiring. If a new CBA has not been executed by November 1" of the year in which a CBA is expiring, the District shall notify the City of the economic issues on which the parties have not reached tentative agreement. 4.2.3 Documentation of Labor Costs. Upon executing a new CBA, the District shall provide supporting documentation sufficient to allow the City to confirm that the labor costs have not increased more than the limits set forth in Section 4.2.1, including comparable agency compensation data used by the parties or the interest arbitrator to establish new compensation levels. 4.3 -4.4 [sections relocated and renumbered for clarity] 4.5 Indirect Operating Cost Portion of Contract Payment. The District shall determine the Indirect Operating Cost portion of the Contract Payment according to the following: E a • Overhead shall be ten percent (10%) of the cost of the City Station Personnel cost; ;v • Equipment maintenance and operation, medications, and supplies shall be ten N percent (10%) of the City Station Personnel cost; w • Fire Marshal allocation of fifty percent (50%) of wage and benefit cost of the position, and Fire Inspector at one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of wage and benefit cost of the position (See Exhibit A); and • Apparatus replacement costs based upon the District Apparatus Replacement Schedule —Rolling Stock designated as Exhibit D. The total of the City Station Personnel cost and the Indirect Operating Costs, plus any additional amounts due to annexations as provided in Section 4.6, less the "Esperance Offset", shall constitute the Contract Payment for the ensuing year. 4.6 Annexation. The City's Urban Growth Area contains property within the boundaries of the District. Should the City seek to annex portions of the District, the District will not oppose the annexation. In the event the City annexes portions of the District other than Esperance, the Contract Payment shall be increased by an amount calculated by applying the then current District levy rate and emergency medical services levy rate to 10 Packet Pg. 14 4.1.a the assessed value of the annexed area, plus revenue from a Fire Benefit Charge, if imposed, that the District would have received from the annexed area in the year in which the Contract Payment is calculated. The increase in the Contract Payment shall occur on the first month on which the District is no longer entitled to collect non - delinquent tax revenue from the annexed area pursuant to RCW 35.13.270(2). 4.6.1 Esperance Annexation. If the City annexes all of the area commonly referred to as "Esperance", the District will support the annexation. Whenever any portion of Esperance is annexed, the Esperance Offset attributable to the annexed area shall no longer be used to reduce the calculation of the Contract Payment at such time as the District is no longer entitled to collect non -delinquent tax revenue from the annexed area pursuant to RCW 35.13.270(2). 4.7 Significant Change in Cost of Providing Services. In the event that there is a material and significant increase or decrease in the costs of providing services under this Restated ILA because the District was required to comply with a legislative or regulatory decision by an entity other than the City, then at the request of either party, the City and District shall seek to renegotiate this Restated ILA and the Contract Payment to fully compensate the District for actual costs incurred according to the methodology in Exhibit C. An example of a significant increase in cost would be if the state required that fire engines be staffed with four firefighters per engine instead of three. If the City and District are unable to successfully renegotiate the Contract Payment in this context through good faith negotiations, then the complete Dispute Resolution provision of this Restated ILA shall apply. Failure of either party to participate in, or comply with, the Dispute Resolution Procedures in Section 18.1 and/or 18.2 shall be deemed a Material Breach. Nothing herein prevents either party from terminating the Restated ILA pursuant to Section 11.2, whether before or after exercise of the Dispute Resolution provisions of this Restated ILA. L_ 4.8 EMS Transport Fees. The District shall charge fees for the basic life support and di advanced life support transports that it performs. As the EMS service provider for the w City, the District shall receive and pursue collection of all Transport Fees in accordance with District policy for transports that originate within the City limits. The District shall •L remit the amount so received to the City, less an administration fee not to exceed the actual cost of collection on a quarterly basis. The District shall be responsible for, and L agrees to prepare and provide in a timely fashion, reasonable documentation and/or reports to the City. ti 4.9 Creating Unfunded Mandates. The City shall not create any unfunded mandates for increased service or reporting by the District without fully compensating the District for actual costs incurred. 5. CITY EMPLOYEES 5.1-5.8 [Completed. Deleted for clarity]. 11 Packet Pg. 15 4.1.a 5.9 Former City Employees. The City shall indemnify, defend, and hold the District harmless from any and all demands, claims, or actions by former City personnel, which arise out of, or relate to, the time prior to the Commencement Date, provided, however, that the indemnification shall not apply to any claims arising as a result of the District's actions under the Agreement or the Restated ILA. 6. ROLLING STOCK (APPARATUS AND VEHICLES) 6.1 — 6.5 [Completed. Deleted for clarity]. 6.6 District Apparatus Replacement Schedule. The District has provided current information regarding existing and proposed Apparatus Replacement Schedule attached in Exhibit D. The District, in its sole discretion, may elect to purchase new rolling stock or otherwise assign District rolling stock for use within the City. 6.7 Public Safety Boat. Title to the City Public Safety Boat known as Marine 16 (the "Vessel") has been transferred to the District. The District's use of Marine 16 for training and emergencies as a county -wide asset is described in the First Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for Use of Rescue and Fire Boat. Exhibit H to the Agreement is hereby deleted. 6.7.1 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 6.7.2 The District assumes responsibility for maintenance and repairs to the Vessel. However, upon the District's request, the City agrees to provide maintenance and repair c services for the Vessel in exchange for receipt from the District of the City's normal c a hourly shop rates for labor. E 6.7.3 The Apparatus Replacement Schedule (Exhibit D to the Agreement and the Q Restated ILA) is amended to include the Outboard Motors of the Vessel for as long as the Vessel is in operation. The amended Apparatus Replacement Schedule is attached vn hereto. The Contract Payment shall reflect the addition of the Outboard Motors to this 2 w schedule. 6.7.4 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 6.7.5 Use of the vessel by the City of Edmonds Police Department shall continue as agreed to before this Restated ILA. The City is solely responsible for maintaining and certifying its operators. 6.7.5.1 The City's use of the Vessel is at the City's risk. The City acknowledges that the District is making no representations or warranties concerning the Vessel. Further, if the City uses the Vessel without a District operator, the City agrees to be solely responsible for all damage or loss to the Vessel and its apparatus while the Vessel is within the City's control and/or possession. 6.7.5.2 The City agrees to release the District from any claims associated with any training provided to it. The City further agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the 12 Packet Pg. 16 4.1.a District harmless from any and all claims for bodily injury or property damage arising out of the City's use and operation of the Vessel. 6.7.5.3 The City specifically and expressly waives any immunity that may be granted under the Washington State Industrial Insurance Act, Chapter 51 RCW as to any claims by its employees arising from the use of the Vessel. EQUIPMENT 7.1 — 7.4 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 8. OVERSIGHT AND REPORTING 8.1 Agreement Administrators. The District Fire Chief and the City Mayor and/or their designees, shall act as administrators of this Restated ILA for purposes of RCW 39.34.030. During the term of this Restated ILA, the District Fire Chief shall provide the Mayor with quarterly written reports concerning the provision of services under this Restated ILA. The format and topics of the reports shall be as set forth in Section 2.5. The District Fire Chief shall present an annual report covering the previous calendar year to the Edmonds City Council prior to March 1, and at such meeting the Chief shall request, and the City Council shall schedule, the Joint Annual meeting provided for in section 8.2. 8.1.1 The parties agree to meet on a quarterly basis to address the performance of the Restated ILA. It is expected that these quarterly meetings will be attended by at least c one City Council member, the Mayor, the City Attorney, the Finance Director, the District a Fire Chief and at least one Commissioner from the District. E 8.2 Joint Annual Meetinq. In addition to the meeting(s) referred to in Section 8.1 above, the Q Edmonds City Council and Board of Fire District #1 Commissioners shall have a joint annual meeting after, but within 30 days, of the annual report at a properly noticed place N and time to discuss items of mutual interest related to this Restated ILA. 2 w 8.3 Representation on Intergovernmental Boards. The District shall represent the City on intergovernmental boards or on matters involving the provision of services under this Restated ILA as reasonably requested by the Mayor. The City reserves the right to represent itself in any matter in which the interests of the City and the District are not aligned or whenever any matter relates to the appropriation of or expenditure of City funds beyond the terms of this Restated ILA. 9. EXISTING AGREEMENTS 9.1 DEM. SNOCOM and SERS. The City currently has contractual relationships with other entities or agencies including the Department of Emergency Management (DEM) (or successor), Snohomish County Communications Center (SNOCOM) (or successor), and Snohomish County Emergency Radio System Agency (SERS) (or successor). The City shall maintain its representation and financial obligations with those entities or agencies 13 Packet Pg. 17 4.1.a and will act to represent itself and retain authority to negotiate on its behalf. At the discretion of the City, the District may provide representation on behalf of the City on various committees, boards, and/or commissions as requested, as appropriate, and/or as agreed to by mutual agreement of the parties. The parties shall meet to address any changes to the foregoing entities that result in a change to the City's representation or financial obligations. 9.2 Mutual and Automatic Aid. The District shall assume any of the City's remaining contractual responsibility and obligations for the provision of mutual and automatic aid. 9.3 Full Information as Basis for Relationship. The City and District agree to coordinate their individual relationships with other entities and agencies so that the services under this Restated ILA will be provided in an efficient and cost effective manner. The City and District agree to keep each other fully informed and advised as to any changes in their respective relationships with those entities or agencies, whether or not those changes impact the City and/or the District obligations shall be provided to the other party in writing in a timely manner that allows a reasonable opportunity to discuss proposed changes in relationships or obligations. 10. TERM OF AGREEMENT 10.1 20-Year Agreement. The Effective Date of this Restated ILA shall be February 1, 2017. The Commencement Date of the Agreement was January 1, 2010. This Restated ILA shall continue in effect until December 31, 2030, unless terminated earlier as provided in section 11. After December 31, 2030, this Restated ILA shall automatically renew under the same terms and conditions for successive, rolling five (5) year periods unless terminated as provided in section 11. 10.2 Material Breach and Wind -Up Period. In the event of a Material Breach of this Restated ILA, the City and District shall, unless the City and District mutually agree otherwise, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Restated ILA for a minimum of twelve (12) months after notice of the Material Breach (the "Wind -Up Period") provided, however; that the Wind -Up Period shall be (i) ninety (90) days if the Material Breach involves the City's failure to make the Contract Payment or (ii) 180 days if the City fails to timely select a Remedial Measure following the District's issuance of a Threshold Notice; provided further, that during the Wind -Up Period, the City and District shall coordinate their efforts to prepare for the transition to other methods of providing fire and EMS service to the City. The City shall be responsible for all Contract Payment installments required herein until the conclusion of the Wind -Up Period. 11. TERMINATION AND RETURN OF ASSETS 11.1 (Completed. Deleted for clarity) 14 E L Q L_ LL v) 2 w Packet Pg. 18 4.1.a 11.2 Termination — Notice. In addition to terminating this Restated ILA for a Material Breach, either party may terminate this Restated ILA at any time by providing the other party with two (2) years written notice of its intent to terminate. 11.3 Termination Costs. Except as otherwise provided herein, the costs associated with terminating this Restated ILA shall be borne equally between the parties, or in the event of a Material Breach, by the breaching party, provided that in the following circumstances, the cost of termination shall be apportioned as provided below. 11.3.1 Termination Due to Change in Law or by Mutual Agreement. In the event that this Restated ILA is terminated due to a change in law or by mutual agreement, each party shall bear its own costs associated with the termination. 11.3.2 Regional Fire Protection Service Authority. In the event that the District, along with one or more fire protection jurisdictions, elects to create a Regional Fire Protection Service Authority Planning Committee ("RFA Planning Committee") as provided in RCW 52.26.030, the District agrees to notify the City of its intent and subject to mutual approval of the District and other participating jurisdictions, to afford the City an opportunity to be a participant on the RFA Planning Committee. Declining the opportunity to participate in the RFA Planning Committee shall not be construed as a Material Breach on the part of the City. In the event that a Regional Fire Protection Service Authority (RFA) or another legally recognized means of providing fire and emergency medical services is created, inclusive of District, the District's powers and duties under this Restated ILA shall be assigned to the RFA as the District's successor - in -interest as provided by RCW 52.26.100. 11.3.2.1 If the District forms a RFA with any other agency, the parties shall E confer to determine whether any efficiencies have resulted from the creation of the RFA Q that could warrant reconfiguring the service provided to the City. m ii 11.4 (reserved] Cl) r- w 11.5 [reserved] 11.6 Duty to Mitigate Costs. The City and District have an affirmative duty to mitigate their respective costs of termination, irrespective of the party who elects to terminate this Restated ILA and irrespective of the party who must bear the costs of termination. 11.7 Return of Assets to the City. Regardless of the reason for termination, the City and District agree that like assets purchased by and transferred to the District as part of the Agreement shall be purchased by the City as described below. This provision shall not apply to the formation of an RFA in which both the City and the District are participants. 11.7.1 Purchase Back Rolling Stock. All rolling stock in use by the District at the City Fire Stations at the time of termination shall be purchased back at a price that considers the fair market value of the asset and any adjustments to fair market value that would be 15 Packet Pg. 19 4.1.a fair and equitable, including, for example, City contributions to apparatus replacement, costs incurred by the District for acquisition, maintenance, and repair, depreciation, etc. 11.7.2 Purchase Back Equipment. All equipment in use by the District at the City Fire Stations at the time of termination shall be purchased back at fair market value. 11.7.3 [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 11.7.4 District Employees. The District shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any and all demands, claims, or actions by District personnel, which arises out of or relate to the time that such personnel were employees of the District, PROVIDED HOWEVER, that the indemnification shall not apply to any claims arising as a result of the City's actions during the term of the Agreement or the Restated ILA. 12. DECLINE TO MERGE 12.1 City Declines to Merge. In the event that the District enters into an agreement with any other fire district or agency that is functionally equivalent to a merger, the City may opt to terminate this Restated ILA without prejudice or penalty. To exercise this option the City shall provide written notice to the District of its intent to end the Restated ILA. Such notice shall be provided not more than ninety (90) days after receiving written notification from the District in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.1 that the District intends to merge with another entity. 12.1.1 Not a Material Breach. The City's decision to terminate under 12.1 does not c constitute a Material Breach of the Restated ILA and none of the penalties associated a with a Material Breach shall apply to the City. E L 12.1.2 12-Month Notice. The City's notice shall provide an effective date of termination Q which shall be no more than twelve (12) months after the City officially notifies the District of its termination, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, and the costs of vn termination shall be split evenly between the parties. 2 w 12.1.3 City Exit from Agreement. If the City elects to terminate the Restated ILA because of an impending merger between the District and one or more other jurisdiction, the City's exit will be under the terms and conditions described in Section 11.7. 13. [deleted] 14. TOWN OF WOODWAY 14.1 Service to Woodway. The City may, in accordance with the terms herein, subcontract with the Town of Woodway to have the District provide fire and emergency medical services to the Town of Woodway. The City shall consult with the District in advance of entering into any such subcontract, and the District shall have the opportunity for input into any issues that may affect service and/or the cost of providing service. The City shall provide advance written notice to the District of at least twelve (12) months prior to any commencement of such service. The City's subcontracting of the District's service to 16 Packet Pg. 20 4.1.a Woodway shall not be considered an unfunded mandate, and no change in the Contract Payment shall result from such a subcontract, provided that the City is not requesting additional staff to serve Woodway. Any and all payments from such a subcontract with Woodway shall be paid to the City of Edmonds only. The District agrees not to compete with the City of Edmonds in such negotiations. 14.1.1 If the City is requesting additional staff to serve Woodway, the parties shall renegotiate the Contract Payment retroactive to the date that the District begins providing the additional staff. If the parties have not executed an amendment prior to the commencement of service to Woodway, either party may invoke the Dispute Resolution procedures in Section 18.1 and 18.2; provided, however, that any adjustment to the Contract Payment arising out of the Dispute Resolution Procedures shall be retroactive to the date that the District begins providing the additional staff to serve Woodway. In this context, failure of either party to participate in, or comply with, the Dispute Resolution Procedures in Section 18.1 and/or 18.2 shall be deemed a Material Breach. 14.1.2 The City of Edmonds right to subcontract with the Town of Woodway constitutes the consideration for the City's agreement to incur the additional 9.13% in Exhibit C initially attributable to Woodway under the Agreement. 14.1.3 At the City's request, the District agrees to work with Shoreline Fire Department to adjust automatic aid responses into the Town of Woodway. 14.1.4 In the event that the Point Wells development is to become part of the service area for the District, such event shall be deemed a "Negotiation Threshold", and the negotiation provisions of 2.2.3 - 2.2.4 shall apply. 15. [Completed. Deleted for clarity] 16. CITY AND DISTRICT ARE INDEPENDENT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS 16.1 Independent Governments. The City and District recognize and agree that the City and District are independent governments. Except for the specific terms herein, nothing herein shall be construed to limit the discretion of the governing bodies of each party. Specifically and without limiting the foregoing, the District shall have the sole discretion and the obligation to determine the exact method by which the services are provided within the District and within the City unless otherwise stipulated within this Restated I LA. 16.2 Resource Assignments. The District shall assign the resources available to it without regarding to internal political boundaries, but rather based upon the operational judgment of the District as exercised within the limitations and obligations of Sections 2.4 through 2.8. 16.3 Debts and Obligations. Neither the City nor District, except as expressly set forth herein or as required by law, shall be liable for any debts or obligations of the other. 17 E L a� Q m L ii vh 2 w Packet Pg. 21 4.1.a 17. INSURANCE 17.1 Maintenance of Insurance. For the duration of this Restated ILA, each Party shall maintain insurance as follows: Each party shall maintain its own insurance policy insuring damage to its own fire stations, real and personal property and equipment if any, and "policy" shall be understood to include insurance pooling arrangements or compacts such as the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA). The City shall maintain an insurance policy insuring against liability for accidents occurring on City owned property. Such insurance policy shall be in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more than five -thousand dollars ($5,000.00). The District shall maintain an insurance policy insuring against liability arising out of work or operations performed by the District under this Restated ILA in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more than five -thousand dollars ($5,000.00). The phrases "work or operations" and "maintenance and operations' shall include the services identified in Section 1. Scope of Services, the services of the Fire Marshal and the District Fire Chief, acting in the capacity of City Fire Chief and any obligation covered by Exhibit B, Section 9. 17.2 Claims of Former City Employees. The City has provided proof of coverage that it has maintained insurance against claims by former City Personnel for incidents and occurrences which may have occurred prior to the Commencement Date of the Agreement, including but not limited to, injuries, employment claims, labor grievances, and other work -related claims. Such insurance was at all times in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more g than five -thousand dollars ($5,000.00). The City will hold harmless the District and its E insurance provider for any such claims lawsuits or accusations that occurred prior to the Q Commencement Date. L 17.3 Claims of Former District EmploVees. The District represents and warrants that it has do maintained insurance against claims by District employees for incidents and occurrences w which may have occurred during the time period prior to the Commencement Date of the Agreement, including but not limited to injuries, employment claims, labor grievances, L and other work -related claims. Such insurance was at all times in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence with a deductible of not more 0 than five -thousand dollars ($5,000.00). u= 17.4 Hold Harmless. To the extent each party's insurance coverage is not voided, each party agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from any and all claims, costs, including reasonable attorneys' and expert witness fees, losses and judgments arising out of the negligent and intentional acts or omissions of such party's officers, officials, employees and volunteers in connection with the performance of the Agreement or the Restated ILA. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of the Agreement and the Restated ILA. 18 Packet Pg. 22 4.1.a 17.5 Release from Claims. Except as specifically provided in this Restated ILA, and except in the event of breach of this Restated ILA, the District and the City do hereby forever release each other from any claims, demands, damages or causes of action arising prior to the Commencement Date and related to damage to equipment or property owned by the City or District or assumed under the Agreement or the Restated ILA. It is the intent of the City and District to cover this risk with the insurance noted above. 18. DISPUTE RESOLUTION It is the intent of the City and District to resolve all disputes between them without litigation. In the event that any dispute between the City and District cannot be resolved by good faith negotiations between the City and District, then the dispute resolution provision of this Restated ILA shall apply. Excluded from these dispute resolution provisions are issues related to the legislative authority of the Edmonds City Council to make budget and appropriation decisions, decisions to contract, establish levels of service or staffing under Section 2 of this Restated ILA and Chapter 35.103 RCW and other policy matters that state law vests with the City Council. The above exclusions from the dispute resolution process shall not abridge the right of the District to pursue an increase in the Contract Payment as a result of any decision which, itself, is not subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions of this Restated ILA. Nothing herein shall prevent either party from providing notice of termination of the Restated ILA pursuant to Section 11.2 prior to completion of the dispute resolution processes described below; however, such notice shall not affect any obligations to proceed with the Dispute Resolution provisions. 18.1 Mediation. Upon a request by either party to mediate a dispute that is subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions, the parties shall mutually agree upon a mediator. If the E City and District cannot agree upon a mediator within ten (10) business days after such Q request, the City and District shall submit the matter to the Judicial Arbitration and m L Mediation Service (JAMS) and request that a mediator be appointed. This requirement ii N to mediate the dispute may only be waived by mutual written agreement before a party w may proceed to litigation as provided within this Restated ILA. Except for unusual reasons beyond the reasonable control of either party, mediation shall be completed within ninety (90) days after the mediator is selected. Any expenses incidental to mediation, including the mediator's fee, shall be borne equally by the City and District. 0 a, 18.2 Binding Arbitration. If the City and District are unsuccessful in resolving any dispute subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions through mediation, either party may demand binding arbitration as provided herein, unless the nature of the dispute is not subject to arbitration pursuant to other provisions of this Restated ILA. 18.2.1 The arbitration shall be conducted by JAMS in Seattle, Washington or other mutually agreeable dispute resolution service. The dispute shall be governed by the selected arbitration service's Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures. The parties shall agree on a JAMS arbitrator with twenty (20) days from the date the matter is submitted to JAMS. In the event that the parties fail to agree on a JAMS arbitrator within 19 Packet Pg. 23 4.1.a such time, then JAMS shall be asked to submit the names of at least three arbitrators. Each party shall have ten (10) days after receiving the list to strike one name from that list. JAMS shall select the arbitrator from the names on the list that have not been struck by either party. The parties may agree on another arbitrator in JAMS or another person at any time. In the event that JAMS is unable or unwilling to provide an arbitrator and the parties cannot otherwise agree, then either party may request the Snohomish County Superior Court to designate an arbitrator. 18.2.2 At any arbitration involving the Contract Payment, the arbitrator shall, as nearly as possible, apply the analysis used in this Restated ILA and supporting Exhibits to adjust the Contract Payment. The arbitrator may deviate from such analysis and use principles of fairness and equity, but should do so sparingly. 18.2.3 Unless the City and District mutually consent, the results of any binding arbitration session shall not be deemed to be precedent for any subsequent mediations or arbitrations. 18.2.4 The decision of the arbitrator shall be final and binding upon both parties, subject only to the right of appeal as provided in RCW 7.04; provided, however, that in arriving at such decision, neither of the parties nor the arbitrator shall have the authority to alter this Restated ILA in whole or in part. 18.2.5 The arbitrator cannot order either party to take action contrary to law. 18.2.6 The substantially prevailing party, if any, in any binding arbitration action shall be entitled to an award of its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. a 18.3 Litigation. For disputes that are not subject to binding arbitration, either party may file an E L action in Superior Court. Jurisdiction and venue for such actions shall lie exclusively in Q m Superior Court for Snohomish County, Washington. Each party expressly waives the LL right to a jury trial. The party substantially prevailing in any such action or proceeding do shall be awarded its reasonable costs and attorneys' fees. w 19.1 Noticing Procedures. All notices, demands, requests, consents and approvals which may, or are required to be given by any party to any other party hereunder, shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered personally, sent by electronic mail (provided a read receipt is obtained by the sender), sent by nationally recognized overnight delivery service, or if mailed or deposited in the United States mail, sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid to: District Secretary: City Clerk: Snohomish County Fire Protection District No. 1 City of Edmonds 12425 Meridian Avenue 121 51h Avenue North Everett, WA 98208 Edmonds, WA 98020 0141,. Packet Pg. 24 4.1.a Or, to such other address as the foregoing City and District hereto may from time -to -time designate in writing and deliver in a like manner. All notices shall be deemed complete upon actual receipt or refusal to accept delivery. Facsimile transmission of any signed original document and retransmission of any signed facsimile transmission shall be the same as delivery of an original document. 19.2 Other Cooperative Agreements. Nothing in the Restated ILA shall preclude the City and the District form entering into contracts for service in support of this Restated ILA. 19.3 Public Duty Doctrine. This Restated ILA shall not be construed to provide any benefits to any third parties. Specifically, and without limiting the foregoing, this Restated ILA shall not create or be construed as creating an exception to the Public Duty Doctrine. The City and District shall cooperate in good faith and execute such documents as necessary to effectuate the purposes and intent of this Restated ILA. 19.4 Entire Agreement. The entire agreement between the City and District hereto is contained in this Restated ILA and exhibits thereto. This Restated ILA supersedes all of their previous understandings and agreements, written and oral, with respect to this transaction. This Restated ILA supersedes the Agreement except where provisions have expressly been omitted for clarity and conciseness. Only those exhibits referenced in this Restated ILA shall continue to be effective. 19.5. Amendment. This Restated ILA may be amended only by written instrument approved by the governing bodies of the City and District subsequent to the date hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties agree that the formulas for NUUF, UUF, and TBF may be changed administratively by mutual agreement of the parties if executed by the Mayor and Council President (for the City) and the District Fire Chief (for the District) in the event that a significant change occurs which would affect such formulas (e.g. RFA is formed, changes in dispatch technology); provided however, that any changes to the formulas shall be consistent with the underlying intent. Dated this _jjjday of It V 1 017 SNOHOMISH COUNTY FIRE PR TECTION DISTRICT NO a, � �A1�te,uvti 0 21 By: E a� Q m L ii Ch r- w Packet Pg. 25 4.1.a Approv as to form: By: YlstricAtfdm,iiK CITY OF EDMONDS By: Attest: Approved as to form: 0 City Attorney 22 E L Q L_ Cn C W Packet Pg. 26 4.1.a Attest: Approved as to form: District Attorney CITY O EDMONDS D 6 By: Attest: - Approved as to form: By: City Attorney 22 E L Q L_ Cn C W Packet Pg. 27 4.1.a EXHIBIT A FIRE MARSHAL AND FIRE INSPECTOR 1 In consultation with the City, the District Fire Chief shall designate an individual to serve as City Fire Marshal, and ensure the assignment of necessary personnel to support the needs and functions of the Fire Marshal as specified in the International Fire Code, City ordinances, and other fire service -related national, state, and local standards adopted and/or followed by the City. 2. As employees of the District, the City Fire Marshal and Fire Inspector shall perform all of the customary roles and duties associated with their positions: fire prevention, fire investigation; code development, application, interpretation, and enforcement, permit processes, plans review; records retention, response to public records requests and other legal summons; fire and life safety public education; and other duties as assigned in the City and throughout the jurisdictional areas served by the District. 3. The City agrees to pay fifty percent (50%) of the annual personnel cost (wages and benefits) of providing one (1) Fire Marshal, and one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the annual personnel cost (wages and benefits) of providing one (1) Fire Inspector. 4. The City Engine Company Inspection Program shall be maintained in its current form unless modified by mutual agreement of the parties. 5. The City agrees to provide office space, office furnishings, computers, fax, copier, a printer, telephone landlines, and postal support for the use of the Fire Marshal and Fire Inspector in Edmonds City Hall. a 6. All fees collected for Fire Permits/Special use, Fire Plan Checks, and Construction Q Inspections shall be retained by the City. ii vn r- w 23 Packet Pg. 28 4.1.a EXHIBIT B USE OF FIRE STATIONS For as long as the Restated ILA remains in effect, the City hereby grants to the District exclusive use and possession of premises for use as fire stations on the terms and conditions described below. Three Fire Stations. The City shall provide use of the three fire stations located at 8429 - 196" Street Southwest, 275 - 6" Avenue North, and 23009 - 88`h Avenue West in the City of Edmonds, Washington, PROVIDED THAT the City reserves the right to substitute these stations with new stations as further described in the Restated ILA. 2. Compliance with Applicable Codes. The fire stations provided by the City shall be compliant with all applicable codes, including without limitation, the applicable provisions of the Edmonds City Code and applicable Washington State Standards and regulations (currently WAC 296-305-06501 et seq.). 3. No Use Charge. No use charge shall be assessed to the District. The parties agree that the rights and contractual obligations contained within the Restated ILA constitute adequate consideration for District use and possession of the premises. 4. Utilities and Services. The City shall ensure the supply of all utilities necessary for the use of the premises, to include: water, sewer, garbage, heating, air conditioning, electrical power, telephone and information tech noIogylsystem data lines. 4.1 Cost for Utilities. The District shall be responsible for the cost of all utilities used on the premises, except for those utilities supplied by the City. If a separate meter is unavailable for any utility that the District is responsible to pay, then the cost shall be equitably apportioned to the District in a manner agreeable to both parties. 5. Conditions and Repairs. The City agrees to keep the premises and the buildings in good condition and repair as reasonably requested by the District for use as fire stations during the term of this Restated ILA at its own expense. The City shall at all times keep the buildings suitably equipped as fully functioning and operational fire stations. 6. Improvements. Upon District request, the City shall install such reasonable improvements as are normal and customary in connection with District use of premises set forth herein. The City shall pay for such improvements. 24 E a� Q ii M w Packet Pg. 29 4.1.a Removal of Personal Property Upon Termination of Agreement. Upon termination of this Restated ILA, the District shall remove all non -fixed equipment and personal property placed upon the premises by the District during the period of this Restated ILA unless those items are subject to repurchase by the City as provided in the Restated ILA. Any personal property not removed from the fire stations within 60 days after termination of this Restated ILA shall become the property of the City. 8. Maintenance of Premises. 8.1 Maintenance of the buildings, the premises and all improvements thereon is the sole responsibility of the City. Such responsibility includes without limitation, repair of walls, floors, ceiling, interior doors, interior and exterior windows and fixtures, sidewalks, landscaping, driveways, parking areas, walkways, building exterior and signs. 8.2 City shall maintain in good condition the structural parts of the fire stations and exterior buildings and structures which shall include emergency lighting, fences, enclosures, curbs, gutters and sidewalks, foundations, bearing and exterior walls, subflooring and roof, roof -mounted structures, unexposed electrical, plumbing and sewerage systems, including those portions of the systems lying outside the premises, exterior doors, apparatus bay doors, window frames, gutters, downspouts on the building and the heating, ventilating and air conditioning system servicing the premises. 8.3 All janitorial services for routine cleaning of the buildings shall be the a responsibility of the District. E L 8.4 All grounds maintenance of the premises, to include fencing, enclosures, gates, Q landscape, stairs, rails, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drains, and water retention structures shall be the responsibility of the City. LL Cn 9. Insurance and Financial Security. w 9.1 The parties agree that the City shall not be responsible to the District for any property loss or damage done to the District's personal property occasioned by reason of any fire, storm or other casualty whatsoever beyond the control of the City. The District shall insure its personal property located on the premises. 9.2 The District shall not be responsible to the City for any loss or damage to the buildings or premises that is not caused by the sole negligence of the District. The City shall insure the premises and buildings against such loss or damage. The District shall repair any damage to the buildings caused by its sole negligence 9.3 In the event of a casualty loss that renders the premises reasonably unsuitable for the use set forth herein, the City shall provide the District with another suitable location(s) for the District until such time as the premises have been repaired. The cost 25 Packet Pg. 30 4.1.a of repairs, and the costs of relocation between the premises and the substitute location(s), shall be borne by the City. 10. Indemnification for Environmental Claims: Each party shall indemnify and hold the other party harmless from any and all claims, demands, judgments, orders, or damages resulting from the release of hazardous substances on the premises caused in whole or in part by the activity of the indemnifying party, its agents, employees, licensees or invitees. The term "hazardous substances" shall mean any substance heretofore of hereafter designated as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C.Sec. 6901 et seq.; the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. Sec. 1257 et seq.; the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2001 et seq.; the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et. Seq.; or the Hazardous Waste Cleanup -Model Toxic Control Act, RCW 70.105D all as amended and subject to all regulations promulgated thereunder. 11. Indemnification and Hold Harmless: Each party agrees to protect, save, defend, hold harmless and indemnify the other party, its officers, employees and agents from any and all demands, claims, judgments, or liability for loss or damage arising as a result of accidents, injuries, or other occurrences on the premises, occasioned by either the negligent or willful conduct of the indemnifying party, regardless of who the injured party may be. 12. Termination of Agreement. Upon termination of this Restated ILA or any extension 6 thereof, whether by expiration of the stated term or sooner termination thereon as c provided in the Restated ILA, the District shall surrender to City the premises peaceably a and quietly. E L 13. Default and Remedies. Q m L 13.1 Failure of the City to perform repairs or maintenance to the buildings or premises as described in 8 above within a reasonable N period after notice by the District shall constitute a Material Breach under the terms of w this Restated ILA. For purposes of this Restated ILA, a reasonable period shall be construed to mean five (5) business days, for repairs and maintenance that could •L feasibly be performed in such time. 0 13.2 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, if the nature of the repair constitutes an operational, safety, and/or security emergency which materially affects District use of the premises or building for their intended purpose, the City shall perform the repair as soon as possible regardless of the day or hour and no later than forty-eight (48) hours after receiving notification from the District. 13.3 If the City fails to timely perform the repair or maintenance under the conditions described above after notification, the District may have such repair or maintenance performed at City expense. The cost of the repair or maintenance shall be forwarded to the City, which shall pay the cost within thirty (30) days after notice. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the City shall not be in breach of any repair or maintenance ez- Packet Pg. 31 4.1.a obligation herein if the repair cannot be completed within the time set forth herein so long as the City is diligently pursuing completion of the repairs. 27 E L Q L_ CM C W Packet Pg. 32 EXHIBIT C CONTRACT PAYMENT 4.1.a Station Costing Model Station Personnel (FTEs) FTE Battalion Chiefs FTE Captains FTE Firefighter/Paramedics FTE Firefighters Firefighter/Paramedics-12 Hour Firefighters-12 Hour 2017 Sta 16, 17, 20 All Cross Staffed\ALS Average Wage & Benefits per FTE Position 2.424 186,248 13.746 161,593 18.000 147,936 9.492 133,343 147,936 133,343 Total Positions 41.238 FTE Factor 4.582 Station Staffing 9.000 0 ADD: Administrative Overhead 10% Maintenance & Operations 10% Apparatus Replacement 2017 TOTAL SUPPRESSION/EMS CONTRACT COST 2017 Esperance AV 565,469,115 Esperance Est. Property Tax Revenue ADD: Additional Staff Paid Separately by the Contracting Agency Count Fire Chief 254,227 Assistant Chief 213,009 Deputy Chief 199,030 Department Manager - Executive Assistant Manager Professional/Specialist Admin Assistant Technicians - Fire Marshal I 0.500 203,408 Deputy Fire Marshal (Inspector) 1 1.250 169,958 TOTAL ADDITIONAL COSTS TOTAL FIRE/EMS SERVICES COST Cost of living increases based on CPI-W, not Comps Total Labor Costs per Position 451,465 2,221,260 2,662,854 1,265,692 660,127 660,127 310,062 8,231,587 (1,117,150) 7,114,436 101,704 212,448 314,152 7,428,588 Q 28 Packet Pg. 33 4.1.a EXHIBIT D APPARATUS REPLACEMENT 29 r� Q Packet Pg. 34 4.1.a EXHIBIT E Definitions Subject to Administrative Amendments Pursuant to Article 19.5 1. NEIGHBORING UNIT UTILIZATION FACTOR. Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor or NUUF is the method used by the parties to determine how much time Units associated with one jurisdiction are Assigned to calls in another jurisdiction. Because the District provides service across a number of different cities and unincorporated areas, and because those various jurisdictions make payments to the District for those services, Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor is relevant even where a District Unit is dispatched to a call that is still within an area served by the District but outside of the normal area served by that Unit. NUUF is determined by converting the following fraction to a decimal rounded to the nearest thousandths: NUUF = total seconds that non -Edmonds Units are Assigned to calls in Edmonds over the previous calendar year total seconds that Edmonds Units are Assigned to calls outside of Edmonds over the previous calendar year E Formula Explanation: In this fraction, the numerator shall equal the total number of seconds a, that non -Edmonds Units are assigned to calls in Edmonds (not including Fsperance, unless Q m Esperance is annexed) over the previous calendar year. The denominator shall equal the total number of seconds that Edmonds Units are assigned to calls outside of Edmonds (Esperance M shall be considered "outside of Edmonds" for the purpose of this calculation unless Esperance w is annexed) over the previous calendar year. Calculation: Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor shall be calculated separately for the City of Lynnwood (stations 14 and 15 combined) and any non -Edmonds unit within the District, e.g., Station 19, for as long as Lynnwood and the District are not part of the same Regional Fire Authority. Determination of Whether NUUF is in Balance: Unlike the Unit Utilization Factor, the NUUF need only be calculated on an annual basis after the completion of each calendar year. NUUF shall be considered balanced if the NUUF falls somewhere between 0.900 and 1.100. For example; if Lynnwood's Units are assigned to calls in Edmonds that total 1,000,000 seconds during a calendar year, and Edmonds Units are assigned to calls in Lynnwood that total 1,095,000 seconds during a calendar year, the NUUF for that year would equal 0.913 and would be considered in balance. If, on the other hand, the numerator were to remain the same, but the 30 Packet Pg. 35 4.1.a Edmonds Units are assigned to calls in Lynnwood that total 880,000 seconds, the NUUF for that year would equal 1.136 and would be considered out of balance. Special Calculation for 2017: Since this Restated ILA takes effect after January 1, 2017, the 2017 NUUF shall be calculated proportionally for that portion of 2017 following the Effective Date. 2. TRANSPORT BALANCE FACTOR. Transport Balance Factor (TBF) is the method used by the parties to determine how frequently Units associated with one jurisdiction transport patients resulting from calls in another jurisdiction. Because the District provides service across a number of different cities and unincorporated areas, and because Edmonds is entitled to receive transport fee revenue for all District transports resulting from calls in Edmonds regardless of whether the transport is performed by an Edmonds Unit or a non -Edmonds Unit, Transport Balance Factor is relevant to whether transport fees are being distributed in an equitable manner. TBF is determined by converting the following fraction to a decimal rounded to the nearest thousandths: number of transports that non -Edmonds Units provide from calls in Edmonds over 6 months number of transports that Edmonds Units provide from calls outside of Edmonds over 6 months Formula Explanation: In this fraction, the numerator shall equal the total number of transports that non -Edmonds Units provide from calls in Edmonds (not including Esperance, unless Esperance is annexed) over the previous six-month period. When an Edmonds Unit and a non -Edmonds Unit both respond to a call in Edmonds and the non - Edmonds Unit transports the patient, that call may not be counted in the numerator, even if the Edmonds Unit responded with a non -transport vehicle. The denominator shall equal the total number of transports that Edmonds Units provide from calls outside of Edmonds (Esperance shall be considered "outside of Edmonds' for the purpose of this calculation unless Esperance is annexed) over the previous six-month period. Determination of Whether TBF is in Balance: TBF shall be considered "balanced" if the TBF falls somewhere between 0.900 and 1.100. While TBF is intended to be analyzed by looking back over the previous six months, during 2017, a special quarterly TBF shall be calculated that looks at TBF on a quarterly basis and adjusts the calculation method accordingly. The quarterly analysis shall be performed beginning with the second quarter 31 Packet Pg. 36 4.1.a of 2017. The quarterly TBF is intended to give the District the ability to analyze the effect of minor dispatch adjustments before TBF could result in a Threshold Notice being issued. 3. UNIT UTILIZATION FACTOR UUF = Unit Utilization Factor or UUF is the method used by the parties to determine how busy a particular Unit is. Unit Utilization Factor is determined by converting the following fraction to a decimal rounded to the nearest thousandths: number of seconds a Unit is Assigned to all calls over the previous twelve-month period 31,536,000 Formula Explanation: In this fraction, the numerator shall equal the total number of seconds a Unit is Assigned to all calls over the previous twelve-month period. The denominator shall always be 31,536,000 (the number of seconds in a twelve-month M period). Because this contract initially contemplates exactly one Unit at each station, with each station having multiple apparatus types. the total number of seconds a Unit is c a Assigned to all calls shall be the total for all apparatus types used by that Unit. The activity of the Battalion Chief and Medical Services Officer shall not be counted in the E numerator for any unit. For example, if, over the previous twelve-month period, Engine Q 20 was Assigned to calls totaling 72,089 seconds, and Ladder 20 was Assigned to calls totaling 229,320 seconds, and Medic 20 was Assigned to calls totaling 4,008,640 vn seconds, then the calculation for UUF would be made as follows: w 4,310,049 UUF = = 0.1366 (rounded to 0.137) 31,536,000 Frequency of Calculation: Unit Utilization Factor shall be calculated as soon as possible after the end of each quarter, looking back over the previous twelve-month period. While UUF is intended to be analyzed by looking back over the previous twelve months, during the each of the last three quarters of 2017, a special UUF shall be calculated that looks at UUF on a quarterly basis and adjusts the calculation method accordingly. The quarterly analysis during 2017 is intended to keep data from the service delivery model prior to the Effective Date from contaminating the data applicable to the Restated ILA. 32 Packet Pg. 37 c w r c d E w r a Packet Pg. 38 4.1.b South County Fire by the numbers South County Fire serves nearly 300,000 people across 53 square miles in south Snohomish County 15 neighborhood fire stations — — staffed 24/7, including three fire stations in Edmonds aaaaa���n�rnnnn aeaasaaaa3 rrrr�r��aaa � nxnnnnxnn to arrrrarrnrrrrnnnnnx 350+ uniformed personnel 70 firefighters on duty during the day and 64 overnight >(1 37,677 incidents in 2023, including 6,147 in Edmonds Most calls are medical emergencies -o--o= (86% in Edmonds) A F ff/lZi I �Mo n 6 D Lake Keeler's Corner Martha y� Lake i Lynnwood Mountlake Terrace c Brier I 0 U) 0 iz f = I "� w • i = Q i a 0 i Lake Hilton ' o Mill _ M i Creek o Silver Fi o i nv N _ o Q 0 w r = q ® South County Fire Sta a -is LI Packet Pg. 39 o�� Served Under Contract Serving Our Residents • Fires • Medical emergencies • Motor vehicle collisions • Hazardous materials • Rescues • Marine / Water • Other hazards and emergency situations • Community health, safety and risk reduction 0 0 CL Packet Pg. 40 Emergency Medical Services • This is our most requested service • All firefighters are emergency medical technicians or paramedics • 86% of incidents in the City of Edmonds were dispatched as EMS in 2023 South County Fire is the first agency in the county to carry whole blood to provide in -field blood transfusions for patients with life -threatening medical conditions or trauma injuries. O 0 CL Packet Pg. 41 Emergency Medical Services Cardiac arrest saves South County Fire's cardiac arrest save rate across the RFA is consistently well above state and national averages O 0 CL Packet Pg. 42 Community Resource Paramedics • Non -emergency service to help reduce 911 calls and hospital use • Serves older adults, behavioral health patients, disabled people, homeless and veterans • Breaks down barriers and creates access to care Cz Packet Pg. 43 0 0 CL Community Outreach Free online classes • ACT First Aid & CPR • Disaster Preparedness • Child Car Seat Safety • Virtual Car Seat Checks • Home Fire Safety • Aging in Place • Child Safety & CPR Distribution of lifesaving devices • Child car seats • Smoke alarms • CO alarms • Infant safe sleep sacks • Bike helmets • File of Life Community events in Edmonds More than 7,500 residents reached at events including Fire Camp, Fourth of July Parade and fire station open events in the city 0 0 CL Packet Pg. 44 Fire Prevention lq Packet Pg. 45 O O CL Q CL O U C 'i Q M O O_ 0 M N O N r- O Q d O 7 C C Q N C O E W C d E t v w r Q Training 2023 ACAD E MY GRADUATES 3 14 0 0 CL C a CL 0 U C 'i Q M O O_ 0 M N O N r- 0 CL a c 0 E w c d w r Q Packet Pg. 46 EMERGENCY RESPONSES 2023 by the numbers and contract -required metrics 10 Packet Pg. 47 vj 0 o_ 0 M N 0 N O CL a 0 E W E w a How many calls*?. Total incidents in the City of Edmonds in 2023: 6,147 2019 12.05% increase from 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Source: Snohomish County 911 data 11 Packet Pg. 48 0 0 CL What type of calls? 86% of calls are dispatched as emergency medical aid Source: Snohomish County 911 data 12 Packet Pg. 49 0 0 CL Response times • Looks at 8-minute response time in four categories • This measures Sno911's call receipt to arrival • Comparisons of data for 2019-2023 13 Packet Pg. 50 0 0 CL Response Times Percentage of calls within 8 minutes or less 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Response time on 90% of calls 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Source: Snohomish County 911 data 14 Packet Pg. 51 0 Cn 0 Turnout Time • Measures the time from when Sno911 call is dispatched to the time the apparatus leaves the station • The reporting standard in the contract is different from the city's adopted standard in the 1756 compliance report: 2:15 (contract) vs. 2:45 (compliance report) • South County Fire nearly met the city adopted standard of 2:45 (89.05%) Turnout time percentage at 2:15 82.34% L 90 percent turnout time 77.66%78.07% 75.03% 2:34 2:42 2:43 1 1 1• 1 1 1 1 qn,?o Source: Snohomish County 911 data 15 Packet Pg. 52 O 0 CL _ Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor What it evaluates: Response of units across jurisdictional boundaries. What the numbers mean: • 100% = an equal balance of cross -jurisdictional response • Contract considers 90%-110% to be within balance range • Over 100% = units from neighboring jurisdictions are responding into Edmonds more than Edmonds units are responding outside the city Why does this matter? ■ We have a regional emergency delivery system ■ This evaluates if level of service decisions in one jurisdiction negatively impact a neighboring jurisdiction 16 Packet Pg. 53 0 0 CL Neighboring Unit Utilization Factor Added aid unit, March 2022 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ■ Mountlake Terrace ■ Lynnwood RFA Source: Snohomish County 911 data 17 Packet Pg. 54 0 Cn 0 Unit Hour Utilization Factor What it evaluates: Percentage of time a fire unit is on a call What the numbers mean: The higher the number, the busier the unit is • Unit Hour Utilization Factor is up for Edmonds stations, but within compliance with contract standards • This number is up at two of three Edmonds fire stations • 20% is the trigger to start looking at deployment options and additional resources 18 Packet Pg. 55 O 0 CL Unit Hour Utilization Factor ■ Station 16 ■ Station 17 Station 20 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Source: Snohomish County 911 data 19 Packet Pg. 56 0 0 CL Transport Balancing Factor 2021 2022 2023 Looks at the balance between EDMONDS OUTSIDE CITY The number of times Edmonds -based units ari doing transports outside the city OUTSIDE CITY EDMONDS The number of times South County Fire units based outside the city are doing transports in Edmonds In 2023, the factor was under 1.0 OUTSIDE CITY units transporting in EDMONDS LESS THAN EDMONDS units transporting OUTSIDE CITY A factor of 1.0 = in balance Source: Snohomish County 911 data Packet Pg. 57 0 0 CL • e required metrics SUUTH COUNTY FIRE FM5 Transport fees billed and collected in Edmonds and Esperance $3,000,000 , $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 Edmonds Billed 02019 $2,310,729 02020 $2,164,260 ■2021 $2,314,119 02022 $2,500,700 02023 $2,689,951 Edmonds collected $973,880 $896,643 $870,562 $995,040 $1,154,454 r- MMMM Esperance Esperance Billed collected $118,595 $48,838 $85,807 $34,927 $68,059 $27,601 $79,605 $33,188 $71,805 $31,865 Shoreline into Edmonds (measured in incident responses) 140 119 120 97 100 80 60 56 48 40 16 20 0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Edmonds unit into Woodway (measured in seconds) 14000 12000 10000 8000 6000 5288 5544 4713 4000 2000 287 0 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 21 Packet Pg. 58 Standards of Cover compliance Turnout time in Turnout time in First arriving engine Standards of Cover contract company to a fire Full first -alarm assignment at residential fire Full first -alarm assignment at commercial fire BLS response ALS response ■ Standard ■ 2021 2022 ■ 2023 Source: Snohomish County 911 data Packet Pg. 59 0 0 CL 4.1.b House fire response A minimum of 22 firefighters are dispatched to a house fire ,d„5 0 0 O it it �I 1 Technical Rescue Truck Q Q 11 II II fp1 Ip11p1 Q O 11 11 11 Ip1�p�Ip� 0 � Q 11 11 11 3 Fire Engines v v 1 Ladder Truck 1 Medical Services Officer O O 111 111, 111' y�1 Ida y:� y-t �IIp�Ip1 Ip11p1 Ip1 JI 11 11 O O 11 11 � O 11 2 EMS Units 2 Battalion Chiefs 23 Packet Pg. 60 t r O Cn O CL M _ a 4.1.b questions? ����w pwoww w��e.a�wroo .. yy 24 Packet Pg. 61 0 0 a d R 4.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Citizen's Tree Board 2024 Annual Report Staff Lead: Angie Feser Department: Parks, Recreation & Human Services Preparer: Angie Feser Background/History The 2024 Citizens' Tree Board is required to provide an Annual Report in the first quarter of the year to City Council. This year's report will be provided by Board Chairperson, Wendy Kliment and the PowerPoint presentation is attached. Staff Recommendation No action by Council required, this is an Annual Report by the Citizens' Tree Board as per Edmonds City Code. Narrative The Citizens' Tree Board actively encourages the planting, protecting, and proper maintenance of trees for long-term community benefit. The Board was created in 2010 under Chapter 10.95 of the Edmonds City Code. The Board has seven members plus one alternate and one non -voting, ex off icio position filled by an Edmonds City Council member. All Board members must be Edmonds residents and, if possible, represent different watersheds and neighborhoods. The code also notes a preference for members to have professional or hobbyist interest/experience in urban forestry, horticulture, habitat restoration, and related plant or wildlife backgrounds. GOALS 1. Encourage Edmonds residents to become stewards of the urban forest. 2. Sponsor an annual Arbor Day event. 3. Increase community outreach and education on the value of trees, proper selection of trees, and correct methods for planting and caring for trees. 4. Partner with community organizations on urban forest stewardship projects, including invasive plant removal and native vegetation planting. 5. Provide advisory recommendations on draft tree codes to the City Council and/or Planning Board to help preserve and protect existing trees, encourage planting of additional trees, and protect trees with development. 6. Work to develop funding sources to expand tree related programs. 7. Help achieve and maintain Tree City USA status and Growth Awards. Attachments: Packet Pg. 62 4.2 Tree Board 2024 Annual Presentation to City Council Packet Pg. 63 4.2.a O-V E-Djf'n. lree, City of Edmonds Citizens' Tree Board Presentation 2023 annual report to City Council Packet Pg. 64 4.2.a OF EDVO �r Meet our Members, 2024 �Rht Tree. RiRh�e\ 0 Wendy Kliment (Chair) Bill Phipps (Vice -Chair) Janelle Cass Ian Higgins Ben Mark Crane Stavig Ross Dimmick (Alternate) • Jenna Nand (City Council/Ex-Officio) U Packet Pg. 65 4.2.a Tree Board's Main Mission C4 CD C4 0 The Citizens'Tree Board actively encourages the planting, protecting, and 0 proper maintenance of trees for long-term community benefit. t-tv EDAM 1 ree, R-10" Packet Pg. 66 4.2.a Year in Review -2023 Packet Pg. 67 4.2.a OF EDVO � Year in Review - 2023 ��hr rrce' RiP,h�e`� • Edmonds is now in its 13t" year as a Tree City USA • Earth Day — The Tree Board is now supported by the Edmonds Parks & Recreation Department, creating more opportunities for partnership, such as ➢Yost Park Tree Planting ➢Bark Chips at Pine Ridge Park • Partnered with Edmonds in Bloom on their Garden Tour (7t" year) a N O N O m d Jn U Packet Pg. 68 4.2.a OF EDVO � Year in Review - 2023 ��hr rrce' RiP,h�e`� • Arbor Day Event in October ➢Booth at the Farmers Market ➢ Education component about critical areas ✓ GIS interactive map at the Farmers Market ➢ Gave away 90 trees to Edmonds residents ➢Afternoon tree tour with Instructor, Horticultura list and Certified Arborist, Bess Bronstein • Winter market - Gave away 60 conifers to Edmonds residents at the December winter market • Provided input on the tree code a N O N O m d Jn U Packet Pg. 69 4.2.a Earth Day 2023 0 Packet Pg. 70 4.2.a Packet Pg. 71 4.2.a rfto f, j V Packet Pg. 72 'RD '4jLOA Farmers Market — October 2023 I Packet Pg. 73 1 4.2.a t v ` owe! Winter Market — December 2023 Packet Pg. 74 4.2.a Packet Pg. 75 4.2.a OF ED-IVO Al 2024 Plans in Summary d'h� Trec, Rig��e` • Educate and assist through various activities and events including: ➢ Earth Day, April 2024 ➢ Tree seedling potting and giveaway at Watershed Fun Fair, May 2024 ➢ Downtown Edmonds - educational tree tags ➢ Edmonds in Bloom garden tour - tree identification ➢ Farmers Market • Partner with Edmonds Parks and Recreation Department and Sound Salmon Solutions at Edmonds Parks • Continue to provide input on the Tree Code N O N O m d Jn U Packet Pg. 76 7.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Claim for Damages for filing Staff Lead: NA Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Marissa Cain Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Acknowledge receipt of Claims for Damages for filing. Narrative Kaylin Woolley Alley of 5th Ave ($220.45) Attachments: Claim for Damages - Woolley - for council Packet Pg. 77 7.1.a CITY OF EDMONDS CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FORM Date Claim Form Received by City — :1, Id Please take note that KCkul °1 Up N LI who currently resides at ma ling address home phone # k phone # , and who resided at at the time of the occurrence and hose date of birth IS is claiming damages against W �in the sum of $ rising out of the following circumstances listed below. DATE OF OCCURRENCE: tl I -;7- LN TIME. `Z— &" LOCATION OF OCCURRENCE: DESCRIPTION escribe the conduct and circumstance that brought about the injury or damage. Also describe the injury or damage. l'n LA- O:l 1�) a� rS�hcQ (attach an extra sheet for additional mrorrnduun, It IIV�... ) Provide a list \o\--f witnesses, if annlirable. to the occurrence including names, addresses, and phone numbers. lw/'vLTI.- 3. Attach copies of all documentation relating to expenses, injuries, losses, and/or estimat7forair. Have ou submitted a claim for damages to your insurance company? s No 4. y If so, please provide the name of the insurance company: and the policy #: Packet Pg. 78 7.1.a This Claim form must be signed by the Claimant, a person holding a written power of attorney from the Claimant, by the attorney in fact for the Claimant, by an attorney admitted to practice in Washington State on the Claimant's behalf, or by a court -approved guardian or guardian ad litem on behalf of the Claimant. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct. Signat re of Claimant Da a an place (residential address, city and county) Or Signature of Representative Date and place (residential address, city and county) Print Name of Representative Bar Number (if applicable) Please present the completed claim form to: City Clerk's Office City of Edmonds 121 51h Avenue North Edmonds, WA, 98020 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Form Revised 04/09/2021 Page 2 oI2 E U 9 Packet Pg. 79 7.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 January Monthly Report Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Dave Turley Background/History January monthly report. Staff Recommendation Information only. Narrative N/A Attachments: January Monthly Report Packet Pg. 80 O-V U~/ EDP � O CITY OF EDMONDS MONTHLY BUDGETARY FINANCIAL REPORT JAN UARY 2024 Packet Pg. 81 GENERAL FUND SUMMARY 7.2.a General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Rolling 24 months) r. General Fund Revenues .—General Fund Expenses 10,000,000 — — 9,000,000 —� 8,000, 000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000 000 — _ /- 2,000,000 1,000,000 - -- February May August November February May August November General Fund Tax Revenue (2018 through 2023) — — -- Sales Tax Property Tax EMS Tax Other Taxes 12,000,000 -- 10,000, 000 —�—�� 8,000,000 — a — 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600, 000 1,400, 000 1,200,000 1,000, 000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 General Fund Tax Revenue (2024 YTD) Sales Tax Property Tax $599,964 6,012 W_ EMS Tax Other Taxes Y1m O d _ 0 _ ca r 0 d c 0 cc _ W E a 1 Packet Pg. 82 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -General Fund 2024 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 2,696,328 $ 2,696,328 February 5,382,958 2,686,630 March 8,188,834 2,805,875 April 12,797,317 4,608,484 May 21,760,095 8,962,778 June 24,435,228 2,675,133 July 27,403,259 2,968,031 August 30,732,913 3,329,654 September 33,505,242 2,772,329 October 39,039,376 5,534,133 November 47,850,227 8,810,851 December 51,056,792 3,206,565 Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 $ 2,532,339 -6.08% General Fund o: vw.wV - 50000.W0 45,000,000 / 40AW,000 35,000,000 300W.W0 ; 25 000,000 20,OMWO 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC —0—Current Year Budget � Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Estate Excise Tax 2024 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 225,388 $ 225,388 5 February 376,297 150,909 March 569,768 193,471 April 775,427 205,659 May 1,036,020 260,593 June 1,293,139 257,119 July 1,573,012 279,874 August 1,849,679 276,667 September 2,151,102 301,423 October 2,420,735 269,633 November 2,687,175 266,440 December 3,000,000 312,825 158,734-29.57% Real Estate Excise Tax 1 & 2 0 Z70.000 700,OW 400,000 r - 100,000 / 1.800.000 �- 1,500,000 /- 1,200.000 - 900,000 600,000 300,000 0 —r —r-- —t—T —r- JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --p—Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 2 Packet Pg. 83 7.2.a SALES TAX SUMMARY Health & Personal Care, $5,207 Construction Trade, $141,832 Accommodation, $3,451 Clothing and Accessories, $30,451 Communications, $20,914 Wholesale Trade, $32,242 Sales Tag Analysis By Category Current Period: January 2024 Year -to -Date Total $975,066 Amusement & Automotive Repair, Recreation, $8,083 $23,007 Business Services, $112,981 _ Gasoline, $0 Retail Food Stores, $32,250 Retail .Automotive. $226.620 A Misc Retail, 5202.1 IS Others, $22,777 Manufacturing, $8,081 Eating & Drinking, $105,051 Annual Sales Tax Revenue 14,000,000 - 12,000,000 $11,257,927 $11,614,826 $10,302,518 10,000;000 $8,406,296 $8 452 715 $8,317,046 8,000, 000 6,000, 000 4,000,000 2,000,000 — $975066 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 YTD 2024 I 3 Packet Pg. 84 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sales and Use Tax 2024 Sales and Use Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 956,967 $ 956,967 ; 975,066 1.89% February 2,084,047 1,127,080 March 2,987,849 903,802 April 3,814,928 827,079 May 4,821,039 1,006,111 June 5,796,759 975,721 July 6,836,449 1,039,690 August 7,953,072 1,116,623 September 9,995,564 1,042,491 October 10,116,626 1,121,062 November 11,238,239 1,121,613 December 12,300,000 1,061,761 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Real Personal/Property Tax 2024 Real Personal/Property Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 28,172 $ 28,172 $ February 156,833 128,661 March 877,571 720,738 April 5,200,702 4,323,131 May 6,113,323 912,621 June 6,167,757 54,434 July 6,192,819 25,062 August 6,247,276 54,457 September 6,423,953 176,676 October 10,550,884 4,126,931 November 11,287,789 736,905 December 11,327,000 39,211 15,003 -46.75% *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 4 Packet Pg. 85 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Water Utility Tax 2024 Water Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 90,844 $ 90,844 92,691 2 03% February 154,355 63,511 March 244,152 89,797 April 304,356 60,204 May 393,634 89,278 June 463,947 70,313 July 573,149 109,202 August 666,476 93,327 September 791,033 124,557 October 881,630 90,597 November 983,292 101,662 December 1,047,289 63,997 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Sewer Utility Tax 2024 Sewer Utility Tax Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 101,297 $ 101,297 $ 101,472 0.17% February 185,730 84,433 March 286,530 100,799 April 371,027 84,497 May 472,427 101,400 June 557,139 84,712 July 659,773 102,634 August 744,838 85,065 September 850,226 105,388 October 936,127 85,902 November 1,039,506 103,379 December 1,123,814 84,308 Sewer Utility Tax 1.2(w.000 - - - 1,100,000 I.M0,000 I 900,000 800,000 i 700,000 ' 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 1 200,000 100,000 ' 0 I -� JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget Prior Year *Tire monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 5 Packet Pg. 86 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Meter Water Sales 2024 Meter Water Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Bu dget Fo re ca st Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 907,961 $ 907,961 S 927,056 2.10% February 1,542,839 634,879 March 2,440,331 897,492 April 3,042,049 601,718 May 3,934,362 892,313 June 4,637,093 702,731 July 5,733,149 1,096,056 August 6,665,886 932,738 September 7,911,002 1,245,116 October 8,816,518 905,516 November 9,832,625 1,016,107 December 10,472,890 640,265 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary -Storm Water Sales 2024 Storm Water Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 493,589 $ 493,589 S 474,260 -3.92% February 1,573,695 1,080,106 March 2,071,892 498,197 April 2,515,478 443,586 May 3,014,352 498,874 June 3,458,035 443,682 July 3,948,598 490,563 August 5,030,812 1,082,214 September 5,530,169 499,357 October 5,974,369 444,200 November 6,473,743 499,375 December 6,901,960 428,217 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 6 Packet Pg. 87 7.2.a City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Revenue Summary-UnmeterSewer Sales 2024 Unmeter Sewer Sales Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 1,013,537 $ 1,013,537 $ 1,015,482 0.19% February 1,857,511 843,974 March 2,866,119 1,008,607 April 3,710,735 844,616 May 4,725,346 1,014,611 June 5,572,110 846,764 July 6,598,121 1,026,011 August 7,448,415 850,294 September 8,502,903 1,054,488 October 9,361,565 858,662 November 10,395,964 1,034,399 December 11,238,143 842,179 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 7 Packet Pg. 88 1 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -General Fund 2024 General Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 4,809,941 $ 4,809,941 $ 4,652,570 -3.27% February 8,929,460 4,119,519 March 12,949,656 4,020,196 April 16,605,542 3,655,886 May 20,680,830 4,075,289 June 25,263,943 4,583,113 July 29,265,855 4,001,912 August 33,410,962 4,145,107 September 37,568,248 4,157,286 October 41,684,233 4,115,985 November 46,834,881 5,150,648 December 51,892,793 5,057,912 General Fund 60,000.000 , 55,000.000 + 50,000,000 45,000,000 40,000,000 35,000,000 30.000,00u t 25,000,000 20.000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 / 5,000,000 it — 0 JAN FEB — MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --s—Current Year — Budget Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Non -Departmental 2024 Non -Departmental Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 926,027 $ 926,027 $ 1,244,387 34.38% February 1,489,596 563,569 March 2,012,000 522,404 April 2,395,260 383,260 May 2,923,480 528,220 June 3,677,256 753,776 July 4,126,291 449,035 August 4,662,507 536,216 September 5,123,698 461,191 October 5,544,111 420,414 November 6,294,725 750,614 December 6,857,495 562,770 Non -Departmental 20,UTAi tIVO 18,000,000 16,000,000 - — - --- — — - 14,000,000 12,000.000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 - 4,000,000 ` 1,000,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC — —Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. . O IZ 4) t C O to 3 C c� O CL Q s C O CU 3 C fE C d E L C� CU r Q 8 Packet Pg. 89 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Council 2024 City Council Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 34,240 $ 34,240 $ 40,574 18.50% February 71,153 36,913 March 112,189 41,036 April 150,403 38,214 May 193,081 42,678 June 234,428 41,347 July 275,019 40,591 August 316,493 41,474 September 357,868 41,375 October 394,551 36,684 November 435,285 40,734 December 479,286 44,001 Office of Mayor City Council 500,000-- 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 / 100,000 50,000 �. 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -Current Year Budget Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Office of Mayor 2024 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 40,561 $ 40,561 $ 33,901-16.42% February 82,159 41,598 March 124,596 42,436 April 165,441 40,846 May 205,791 40,350 June 245,843 40,052 July 287,251 41,408 August 327,468 40,217 September 367,326 39,858 October 406,988 39,662 November 449,726 42,738 December 490,875 41,149 Office of Mayor 500,000 450,000 400,000 350,000 300,000 250.000 '_'00.000 - 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --0--Current Year -Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 9 Packet Pg. 90 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Human Resources 2024 Human Resources Cumulative Monthly Y-rD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 110,919 $ 110,919 $ 129,960 17A7% February 206,083 95,165 March 293,020 86,937 April 385,026 92,006 May 477,507 92,481 June 609,764 132,257 July 691,435 81,671 August 781,445 90,009 September 882,461 101,016 October 976,331 93,870 November 1,084,356 108,025 December 1,222,438 138,082 Human Resources 1,300,000 11200,000 1,100,000 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 600,000 ti 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC *-Current Yea Budget Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Municipal Court 2024 Municipal Court Cumulative Monthly Y-rD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 133,120 $ 133,120 $ 136,698 February 268,761 135,641 March 408,462 139,701 April 549,323 140,861 May 702,755 153,432 June 841,629 138,874 July 987,720 146,091 August 1,144,145 156,425 September 1,291,990 147,845 October 1,441,979 149,989 November 1,629,476 187,497 December 1,811,176 181,700 2.69 Municipal Court 2.000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400.000 1,200,000 1.000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 - 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -+-Current Yea Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 10 Packet Pg. 91 I 7.2.a I City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Community Services/Economic Development 2024 Community Services/Economic Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 70,938 $ 70,938 $ 84,711 19.42% February 150,629 79,691 March 228,686 78,058 April 308,932 80,246 May 391,061 82,128 June 480,392 89,331 July 570,789 90,397 August 679,369 108,580 September 777,142 97,773 October 877,976 100,834 November 1,007,121 129,145 December 1,162,045 154,924 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 11 Packet Pg. 92 7.2.a City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report - Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund 2024 Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 278,067 $ 278,067 5 450,425 61.98% February 459,653 181,586 March 687,018 227,364 April 781,894 94,876 May 882,974 101,080 June 1,005,318 122,345 July 1,131,059 125,740 August 1,299,834 168,775 September 1,465,789 165,955 October 1,643,179 177,391 November 1,772,621 129,442 December 2,011,076 238,455 Fund 512 - Technology Rental Fund 2,200,000 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 - 400,000 - 200,000 - 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Administrative Services 2024 Administrative Services Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 288,918 $ 288,918 $ 274,596 February 523,687 234,769 March 733,695 210,008 April 944,992 211,297 May 1,157,177 212,186 June 1,442,022 284,845 July 1,684,828 242,805 August 1,896,259 211,431 September 2,116,379 220,121 October 2,344,386 228,007 November 2,598,917 254,531 December 2,825,453 226,536 -4.96% Administrative Services 3,000,000 2,800,000 2,600.000 2,400,000 �l 2,200.000 1000.000 - 1,800.000 1,6000111 1,400,000 1,200,000 i,000,000 -� 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -Current Year Budget Prior Year 'The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 12 Packet Pg. 93 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -City Attorney 2024 City Attorney Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 96,815 $ 96,815 $ 0.00% February 193,630 96,815 March 290,445 96,815 April 387,260 96,815 May 484,075 96,815 June 580,890 96,815 July 677,705 96,815 August 774,520 96,815 September 871,335 96,815 October 968,150 96,815 November 1,064,965 96,815 December 1,161,780 96,815 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Police 2024 Police Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 1,325,644 $ 1,325,644 $ 1,320,779 -0.37% February 2,644,333 1,318,689 March 4,027,557 1,383,224 April 5,378,981 1,351,424 May 6,782,808 1,403,826 June 8,239,937 1,457,130 July 9,689,531 1,449,593 August 11,039,396 1,349,866 September 12,478,176 1,438,780 October 13,942,747 1,464,571 November 15,677,275 1,734,528 December 17,478,540 1,801,265 Police 18,000,000 16.000,000 — - 14,000,000 12,000,000 - 10,000,000 8,000,000 - - - - 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC --*--Current Year Budget Prior Year *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. .F O IZ Q t C O to 3 C c� O IZ Q s C O CU 3 C t4 C d E L C� fU r r.+ Q 13 Packet Pg. 94 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Planning & Development 2024 Planning & Development Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Bu dget Fo re ca st Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 328,959 $ 328,959 $ 269,177-18.17% February 671,531 342,572 March 999,838 328,306 April 1,348,844 349,006 May 1,692,557 343,714 June 2,024,917 332,360 July 2,387,504 362,587 August 2,727,099 339,594 September 3,071,846 344,748 October 3,418,696 346,949 November 3,799,763 381,067 December 4,251,605 451,842 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Parks & Recreation 2024 Parks & Recreation Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 498,850 $ 498,850 5 453,277 -9.14% February 986,757 487,907 March 1,483,576 496,818 April 1,955,557 471,981 May 2,461,256 505,698 June 2,984,923 523,667 July 3,580,661 595,738 August 4,186,784 606,123 September 4,840,484 653,700 October 5,394,700 554,215 November 5,962,605 567,905 December 6,520,597 557,992 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 14 - Packet Pg. 95 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report - Fund 016 - Building Maintenance Fund 2024 Fund 016 - Building Maintenance Fund Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 93,773 $ 93,773 $ 138,032 47.20% February 187,546 93,773 March 281,318 93,773 April 375,091 93,773 May 468,864 93,773 June 562,637 93,773 July 656,410 93,773 August 750,182 93,773 September 843,955 93,773 October 937,728 93,773 November 1,031,501 93,773 December 1,125,275 93,773 Facilities Maintenance Fund 016 -Building Maintenance Fund 1,200,000 1,100,000 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 - 600,000 500,000 -� 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Current Year Budget Prior Year City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Facilities Maintenance 2024 Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals January $ 156,777 $ 156,777 5 280,811 79.11% February 389,680 232,903 March 593,580 203,900 April 769,287 175,707 May 948,286 178,999 June 1,082,262 133,976 July 1,241,226 158,964 August 1,449,125 207,900 September 1,701,717 252,591 October 1,994,291 292,575 November 2,251,871 257,580 December 2,638,179 386,308 *The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 15 Packet Pg. 96 City of Edmonds, WA Monthly Expenditure Report -Engineering 2024 Engineering Cumulative Monthly YTD Variance Budget Forecast Budget Forecast Actuals % January $ 301,531 $ 301,531 $ 283,081 -6.12% February 604,565 303,034 March 913,824 309,259 April 1,223,821 309,997 May 1,553,842 330,021 June 1,868,266 314,424 July 2,185,239 316,973 August 2,491,236 305,997 September 2,797,476 306,240 October 3,102,475 304,999 November 3,439,952 337,477 December 3,777,853 337,901 "The monthly budget forecast columns are based on a five-year average. 16 Packet Pg. 97 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 1 CITY OF EDMONDS REVENUES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount No. Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received 001 GENERAL FUND $ 51,056,792 $ 2,320,252 $ 2,532,339 $ 48,524,453 5% 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 250,000 - - 250,000 0% 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 112,290 7,854 9,461 102,829 8% 017 MARSH RESTORATION & PRESERVATION FUND - - 200 (200) 0% 019 EDMONDS OPIOID RESPONSE FUND 50,000 - - 50,000 0% 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 4,520 127 292 4,228 6% III STREET FUND 2,630,600 120,069 102,407 2,528,193 4% 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 4,946,998 14,713 39,657 4,907,341 1% 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 87,776 1,283 4,702 83,074 5% 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 124,371 7,918 9,099 115,272 7% 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 38,900 9,050 7,182 31,718 18% C 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 1,740 29 128 1,612 7% r- 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 44,193 2,799 3,627 40,566 8% 0� T 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 1,627,900 81,737 94,784 1,533,116 6% 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 1,639,520 82,970 108,305 1,531,215 7% C O 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 215,830 9,751 22,140 193,690 10% 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 152,990 23,518 11,561 141,429 8% M 136 PARKS TRUST FUND - 303 - - 0% 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FD 55,580 4,628 9,790 45,790 18% 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 5,680 37 134 5,546 2% p O_ 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 79,209 29,798 23,822 55,387 30% 4) 141 AFFORDABLE AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING FUND 65,000 7,639 8,397 56,603 13% >% 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 6,550,000 350 1,834,501 4,715,499 28% t C 143 TREE FUND 220,930 425 1,646 219,284 1% O 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 310,420 - 350 310,070 0% O 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 316,240 341 30,104 286,136 10% 411 COMBINED UTILITY OPERATION - 11,010 12,430 (12,430) 0% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 12,314,744 986,743 1,090,370 11,224,374 9% 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 8,499,216 471,107 542,348 7,956,868 6% d 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 20,019,768 1,225,668 1,476,339 18,543,429 7% s 0 O 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,996,270 - 2,147 1,994,123 0% Q 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 2,706,730 192,708 249,620 2,457,110 9% 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 2,173,664 117.106 181,567 1,992.097 8% S 118,297.871 S 5,729,932 S 8,409,447 S 109.888,424 70% 17 Packet Pg. 98 I 7.2.a I Page 1 of 1 C TTY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - SUMMARY Fund 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount No Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent 001 GENERAL FUND $ 51,892,793 $ 4,868,760 $ 4,652,570 $ 47,240,223 9% 009 LEOFF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE 367,140 27,422 25,348 341,792 7% 014 HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFT FUND 11,701 - - 11,701 0% 016 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND 1,125,274 81,158 138,032 987,242 12% 104 DRUG ENFORCEMENT FUND 39,000 - - 39,000 0% III STREET FUND 2,662,492 450,818 340,359 2,322,133 13% 112 COMBINED STREET CONST/IMPROVE 4,699,705 - - 4,699,705 0% 117 MUNICIPAL ARTS ACQUIS. FUND 282,880 475 - 282,880 0% 120 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX REVENUE FUND 131,400 3,222 - 131,400 0% 121 EMPLOYEE PARKING PERMIT FUND 26,880 - - 26,880 0% 122 YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND 3,000 - 75 2,925 3% O 123 TOURISM PROMOTIONAL FUND/ARTS 43,400 780 - 43,400 0% C 125 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 2 2,460,645 7,348 9,268 2,451,377 0% 126 REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX 1 1,379,355 855 1,378,500 0% t 127 GIFTS CATALOG FUND 618,646 3,731 26,382 592,264 4% C 130 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE/IMPROVEMT 290,559 32,414 15,594 274,965 5% 137 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE TRUST FUND 25,000 - - 25,000 0% 3 138 SISTER CITY COMMISSION 11,900 - - 11,900 0% 140 BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 103,545 17 - 103,545 0% 142 EDMONDS RESCUE PLAN FUND 6,550,000 241,583 1,834,084 4,715,916 28% 0 143 TREE FUND 214,800 - - 214,800 0% CL 4) 231 2012 LT GO DEBT SERVICE FUND 310,420 - - 310,420 0% >, 332 PARKS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 139,685 141,463 - 139,685 0% 421 WATER UTILITY FUND 13,568,408 688,320 503,314 13,065,094 4% 0 422 STORM UTILITY FUND 8,495,157 409,316 397,818 8,097,339 5% 423 SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 22,720,243 1,340,398 1,373,009 21,347,234 6% ca 3 C 424 BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,830 - - 1,988,830 0% 511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 1,976,212 423.902 148,912 1,827,300 8% 512 TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND 2,011,076 355,645 450,425 1,560,651 22% d E S 124,150,146 $ 9,076,775 $ 9,916,045 S 114,234,101 8°/a u CU Z Q 18 Packet Pg. 99 7.2.a Page 1 of 3 CITY OF EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received TAXES: REAL PERSONAL / PROPERTY TAX $ 11,327,000 $ 26,466 $ 15,003 $ 11,311,997 0% EMS PROPERTY TAX 4,578,000 10,534 6,012 4,571,988 0% VOTED PROPERTY TAX 500 - 1 499 0% 4 LOCAL RETAIL SALEWSE TAX 1 5 NATURAL GAS USE TAX 6 1 /10 SALES TAX LOCAL CRIM JUST 7 ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX 8 GAS UTILITY TAX 9 SOLID WASTE UTILITY TAX 10 WATERUTILITY TAX 11 SEWERUTILITY TAX 12 STORMWATER UTILITY TAX 13 T.V. CABLE UTILITY TAX 14 TELEPHONE UTILITY TAX 15 PULLTABSTAX 16 AMUSEMENT GAMES 17 LEASEHOLD EXCISE TAX LICENSES AND PERMITS: 18 FIRE PERMITS -SPECIAL USE 19 POLICE -FINGERPRINTING 20 VENDINGMACHINE/CONCESSION 21 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT -COMCAST 22 FRANCHISE FEE-EDUCATION/GOVERNMENT 23 FRANCHISE AGREEMENT-ZIPLY FIBER 24 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT FRANCHISE 25 GENERAL BUSINESS LICENSE 26 DEV SERV PERMIT SURCHARGE 27 RIGHT OF WAY FRANCHISE FEE 28 BUILDINGPERMITS 29 FIRE PERMIT 30 ENGINEERING PERMIT 31 ANIMAL LICENSES 32 STREET AND CURB PERMIT 33 STREET AND CURB PERMIT W/LEASEHOLD TAX 34 OTRNON-BUSLIC/PERMITS 35 SPECIAL EVENT REVIEW INTERGOVERNMENTAL: 36 DOJ 15-0404-0-1-754 - BULLET PROOF VEST 37 HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT 38 STATE GRANTS- BUDGET ONLY 39 PUD PRIVILEDGE TAX 40 TRIAL COURT IMPROVEMENT 41 CJ - POPULATION 42 CRIMINAL JUSTICE -SPECIAL PROGRAMS 43 MARIJUANA EXCISE TAX DISTRIBUTION 44 DUI - CITIES 45 FIRE INS PREMIUM TAX 46 LIQUOR EXCISE TAX 47 LIQUORBOARD PROFITS 48 MISCELLANEOUS INTERLOCAL REVENUE 49 INTERLOCAL GRANTS 50 FIRST RESPONDERS FLEX FUND 12,300,000 879,231 975,066 11,324,934 8% 9,600 - 1,205 8,395 13% 1,150,000 85,227 84,922 1,065,078 7% 1,900,000 185,846 - 1,900,000 0% 895,000 125,375 88,533 806,467 10% 384,000 30,272 41,273 342,727 11 % 1,047,289 86,092 92,691 954,598 9% 1,123,814 89,935 101,472 1,022,342 9% 690,196 41,771 47,430 642,766 7% 850,000 66,442 65,149 784,851 8% 773,000 14,206 69,318 703,682 9% 80,200 19,201 7,969 72,231 10% 350 - - 350 0% 326,000 0 - 326.000 0% 37,434,949 1,660,598 1,596,045 35,838,904 4% 250 - - 250 0% 700 75 40 660 6% 84,500 12,476 6,128 78,372 7% 702,700 - 165,020 537,680 23% 41,000 2,796 2,497 38,503 6% 100,600 - - 100,600 0% 450,000 101,463 - 450,000 0% 250,000 24,287 27,400 222,600 11% 80,000 6,360 9,450 70,550 12% 30,000 13,962 62,575 (32,575) 209% 160,000 32,405 8,194 151,806 5% - - 700 (700) 0% - - 10,607 (10,607) 0% 24,000 7,060 2,801 21,199 12% 50,000 5,830 (330) 50,330 -1% - - 1,587 (1,587) 0% 20,000 - 1,486 18,514 7% - 1,664 - - 0% 1,993,750 208,378 298,154 1,695,596 15% 9,000 - - 9,000 0% 11,100 - - 11,100 0% 20,000 - - 20,000 0% 210,500 - - 210,500 0% 16,740 - - 16,740 0% 13,070 3,758 4,002 9,068 31% 50,600 13,294 14,091 36,509 28% 125,000 - - 125,000 0% 4,500 53 1,429 3,071 32% 75,000 - - 75,000 0% 325,000 71,223 73,033 251,967 22% 343,200 - - 343,200 0% - 500 - - 0% - - 94,684 (94,684) 0% 1.000 - - 1.000 0% 1,204,710 88,828 187,239 1,017,471 16% 1 2024 Local Retail Sa/es(Use Tax revenues are $95,835 higher than 2023 revenues Please also see pagespages3 & 4. 19 Packet Pg. 100 Page 2 of 3 CITY OF EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received CHARGES FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: 1 RECORD/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS $ 3,000 $ $ 1,295 $ 1,706 43% 3 ATM SURCHARGE FEES 600 16 61 539 10% 4 CREDIT CARD FEES 1,000 1,000 0% 5 COURT RECORD SERVICES 150 150 0% 6 D/M COURT REC SER 300 300 0% 7 WARRANT PREPARATION FEE 4,000 4,000 0% 8 IT TIME PAY FEE 1,000 6 1 999 0% 9 MUNIC.-DIST. COURT CURR EXPEN 50 32 32 18 64% 10 CLERKS TIME FOR SALE OF PARKING PERMITS 25,000 - - 25,000 0% 12 PHOTOCOPIES 100 - 20 80 20% 13 POLICE DISCLOSURE REQUESTS 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 14 ENGINEERING FEES AND CHARGES 190,000 9,238 - 190,000 0% 15 ELECTION CANDIDATE FILING FEES 1,400 - - 1,400 0% 16 CUSTODIAL SERVICES(SNO-ISLE) 80,000 11,605 600 79,400 1% 17 PASSPORTS AND NATURALIZATION FEES 70,000 2,380 3,320 66,680 5% 18 POLICE SERVICES SPECIAL EVENTS 30,000 - - 30,000 0% 19 CAMPUS SAFETY-EDM. SCH. DIST. 14,000 - - 14,000 0% 20 WOODWAY-LAW PROTECTION 210,970 56,856 - 210,970 0% 23 FIRE DISTRICT #1 STATION BILLINGS 67,000 19,794 - 67,000 0% 24 LEGAL SERVICES 1,050 - - 1,050 0% 25 ADULT PROBATION SERVICE CHARGE 38,000 643 509 37,491 1% 26 BOOKING FEES 3,000 21 38 2,962 1% 27 FIRE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION FEES 10,000 1,300 827 9,173 8% 28 EMERGENCY SERVICE FEES 3,500 59 111 3,389 3% 29 EMS TRANSPORT USER FEE 1,200,000 - - 1,200,000 0% 30 FLEX FUEL PAYMENTS FROM STATIONS 5,000 303 - 5,000 0% 32 ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEE 65,600 12,960 - 65,600 0% 33 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION 940,000 40,074 67,186 872,814 7% 34 FIRE PLAN REVIEW 19,000 1,422 1,639 17,361 9% 35 PLANNING REVIEW AND INSPECTION 50,500 - 8,148 42,352 16% 36 S.E.P.A. REVIEW 6,000 740 - 6,000 0% 37 ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION 225,000 - 12,103 212,897 5% 38 CRITICAL AREA STUDY 14,000 1,705 2,331 11,669 17% 39 GYM AND WEIGHTROOM FEES 9,500 1,138 1,315 8,185 14% 40 PROGRAM FEES 787,792 29,730 54,777 733,015 7% 41 HOLIDAY MARKET REGISTRATION FEES 5,000 455 140 4,860 3% 42 UPTOWN EVENING MARKET FEES 5,000 - - 5,000 0% 43 WINTER MARKET FEES 5,000 4,680 4,060 940 81% 45 LUNAR NEW YEARS FEES - - 740 (740) 0% 46 BIRD FEST REGISTRATION FEES 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 47 INTERFUND REIMBURSEMENT -CONTRACT SVCS 4,027,314 106,755 138,726 3.888,588 3% 8,120,826 301,913 297,980 7,822,846 4% 20 Packet Pg. 101 1 7.2.a Page 3 of 3 CITY OF EDMO NDS REVENUES - GENERAL FUND 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Revenues Revenues Remaining %Received FINES AND PENALTIES: 1 PROOF OF VEHICLE INS PENALTY 2 TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 3 NC TRAFFIC INFRACTION 4 TRAFFIC CAMERA INFRACTIONS 5 CRT COST FEE CODE LEG ASSESSMENT (LGA) 6 CURRENT TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS 7 NON -TRAFFIC INFRACTION PENALTIES 8 OTHER INFRACTIONS'04 9 PARKING INFRACTION PENALTIES 10 PARK/INDDISZONE 11 DWI PENALTIES 12 DUI - DP ACCT 13 CRIM CNV FEE DUI 14 DUI - DP FEE 15 CRIMINAL TRAFFIC MISDEMEANOR 8/03 16 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CT 17 CRIM CONV FEE CT 18 OTHER NON-TRAF MISDEMEANOR PEN 19 OTHER NON TRAFFIC MISD. 8/03 20 COURT DV PENALTY ASSESSMENT 21 CRIMINAL CONVICTION FEE CN 22 CRIM CONV FEE CN 23 PUBLIC DEFENSE RECOUPMENT 24 BANK CHARGE FOR CONV. DEFENDANT 25 COURT COST RECOUPMENT 26 BUS. LICENSE PERMIT PENALTY 27 MISC FINES AND PENALTIES MISCELLANEOUS: 28 INVESTMENT INTEREST 29 INTEREST ON COUNTY TAXES 30 INTEREST - COURT COLLECTIONS 31 LOAN INTEREST 32 SPACE/FACILITIESRENTALS 33 BRACKET ROOM RENTAL 34 LEASESLONG-TERM 35 DONATION/CONTRIBUTION 36 PARKSDONATIONS 37 BIRD FEST CONTRIBUTIONS 38 POLICE CONTRIBUTIONS FROM PRIV SOURCES 39 SALE OF JUNK/SALVAGE 40 SALES OF UNCLAIM PROP ERT Y 41 CONFISCATED AND FORFEITED PROPERTY 43 POLICE JUDGMENTS/RESTITUTION 45 OTHER MISC REVENUES 46 SMALL OVERPAYMENT 47 NSF FEES - PARKS & REC 48 NSF FEES - MUNICIPAL COURT 51 US BANK REBATE TRANSFER IN: 54 TRANSFERFROM014 55 INTERFUND TRANSFER FROM 016 TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 2,000 $ 151 $ 295 $ 1,705 15% 130,000 12,824 4,310 125,690 3% 18,000 208 139 17,861 1% 500,000 - - 500,000 0% 10,000 317 49 9,951 0% 50,000 - 6,994 43,006 14% 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 1,500 108 - 1,500 0% 125,000 1,370 5,685 119,315 5% 2,000 - 83 1,917 4% 7,000 297 330 6,670 5% 300 - - 300 0% 100 - - 100 0% 1,500 87 164 1,336 11% 25,000 469 137 24,863 1% 2,000 84 103 1,897 5% 700 - 2 698 0% 100 - - 100 0% 12,000 75 - 12,000 0% 800 - - 800 0% 1,000 13 - 1,000 0% 200 - - 200 0% 6,000 480 51 5,949 1% 4,000 477 654 3,346 16% 1,000 172 25 975 2% 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 150 - - 150 0% -902,350 I7, 2% 527,860 19,518 25,378 502,482 5% 22,630 2,560 3,824 18,806 17% 2,430 169 49 2,381 2% 7,270 - 55,316 (48,046) 761% 194,500 1,535 6,290 188,210 3% 2,100 - - 2,100 0% 219,192 18,869 20,922 198,270 10% 1,500 - - 1,500 0% 5,000 500 500 4,500 10% 1,500 - - 1,500 0% 5,000 - 231 4,769 5% 300 - - 300 0% 3,800 34 225 3,575 6% 2,000 - - 2,000 0% 200 - 13 187 7% 5,000 216 21,123 (16,123) 422% 100 1 - 100 0% 100 - 30 70 30% 150 - 150 0% 8.500 - - 8,500 0% 1,009,132 4 ,402 133,900 7 ,232 13% 5,801 - - 5,801 0% 385,274 - - 385,274 0% 391,075 - - 391,075 0% S 51,056,792 S 2,320,252 S 2,532,339 S48,524,453 5% 21 Packet Pg. 102 2.aPag;1�. f 6 C ITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES (001) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 23,095,383 $ 1,976,003 $ 1,868,992 $ 21,226,391 8% 2 OVERTIME 643,080 75,728 116,684 526,396 18% 3 HOLIDAY BUY BACK 294,001 - - 294,001 0% 4 BENEFITS 7,868,408 662,382 740,340 7,128,068 9% 5 UNIFORMS 126,931 14,473 13,909 113,022 11% 6 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 141,668 7,431 2,932 138,736 2% 7 SUPPLIES 677,285 10,870 13,474 663,811 2% 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 239,791 5,535 1,388 238,403 1% 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,918,360 1,040,754 414,539 10,503,821 4% 10 COMMUNICATIONS 236,105 1,967 11,170 224,935 5% 11 TRAVEL 51,187 4,360 695 50,492 1% 12 EXCISE TAXES 30,000 1,365 2,725 27,275 9% 13 RENTALILEASE 3,913,541 218,020 315,916 3,597,625 8% 14 INSURANCE 883,686 625,650 910,495 (26,809) 103% 15 UTILITIES 663,800 55,926 56,826 606,974 9% 16 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 388,300 73,337 81,539 306,761 21% 17 MISCELLANEOUS 424,867 94,959 66,908 357,959 16% 18 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PAYMENTS 25,000 - - 25,000 0% 19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 650,000 - - 650,000 0% 20 BUILDINGS - - 34,040 (34,040) 0% 21 PRINCIPAL PAYMENT LEASES 300,000 - 300,000 0% 22 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 197,120 - - 197,120 0% 23 INTEREST ON LONG-TERM EXTERNAL DEBT 123,780 - 123,780 0% 24 OTHER INTEREST & DEBT SERVICE COSTS 500 - - 500 0% 51,892,793 S 4,86 7 7, 4 + LEO FF-MEDICAL INS. RESERVE (009) 25 BENEFITS $ 206,650 $ 24,129 $ 22,055 $ 184,595 11% 26 PENSION AND DISABILITY PAYMENTS 152,990 3,293 3,293 149,697 2% 27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,000 - - 7,000 0% 28 MISCELLANEOUS 500 - - 500 0% �67,140 S 27,422 S 25,348 S 341,792 7% HISTORIC PRESERVATION GIFTFUND (014) 29 SUPPLIES $ 100 $ - $ - $ 100 0% 30 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200 200 0% 31 MISCELLANEOUS 5,600 5,600 0% 32 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 5,801 5,801 0% I 1,701 s 11,701 % BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND (016) 33 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ - $ - $ 138,529 $ (138,529) $ - 34 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 740,000 81,158 - 740,000 0% 35 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 385,274 - - 385,274 0% 36 CONST RUCT IONS P ROJECT S - - (497) 497 0% 5, 74 S 81,158 S 138,032 S 987,242 /o DRUG INFO RCEMENTFUND (104) 37 SMALL EQUIPMENT $ 39,000 $ - $ - $ 39,000 0% 0 0 O Q d t C O C to O O_ d Q' t w c O to c CU C a� E t 0 O Q 22 Packet Pg. 103 7.2.a Page 2 of 6 1 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL Title 2024 Adopted Budget 1/31/2023 Expenditures 1/31/2024 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent S TREET FUND (l l 1) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 974,440 $ 224,815 $ 83,744 $ 890,696 9% 2 OVERTIME 38,400 4,014 5,827 32,573 15% 3 BENEFITS 444,582 61,857 36,399 408,183 8% 4 UNIFORMS 6,000 - 1,768 4,232 29% 5 SUPPLIES 263,000 1,407 6,685 256,315 3% 6 SMALL EQUIPMENT 90,000 - - 90,000 0% 7 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,210 4,184 34 23,176 0% 8 COMMUNICATIONS 4,500 128 557 3,943 12% 9 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 10 RENTAL/LEASE 311,630 25,244 25,815 285,815 8% 11 INSURANCE 167,350 126,467 172,427 (5,077) 103% 12 UTILITIES 273,730 2,703 3,633 270,097 1% 13 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 52,000 - 2,044 49,956 4% 14 MISCELLANEOUS 8,000 - 1,427 6,573 18% 15 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND PRINCIPAL 4,420 - - 4,420 0% 16 INTEREST 230 - - 230 0% $ 2,662,492 $ 450,818 $ 340,359 $ 2,322,133 13% COMBINED STREEI'CONST/IMPROVE(112) 17 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 3,319,856 $ - $ - $ 3,319,856 0% 18 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 541,167 - - 541,167 0% 19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 320,002 - - 320,002 0% 20 LAND 375,000 - - 375,000 0% 21 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 89,000 - - 89,000 0% 22 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 54,070 - 54,070 0% 23 INTEREST 610 - 610 0% $ 4,699,705 $ - $ - $ 4,699,705 0% MUNICH'ALARTS ACQUIS. FUND (117) 24 SUPPLIES $ 4,700 $ 475 $ - $ 4,700 0% 25 SMALL EQUIPMENT 1,700 - - 1,700 0% 26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 266,500 - 266,500 0% 27 TRAVEL 80 80 0% 28 RENTAL/LEASE 3,000 3,000 0% 29 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 300 300 0% 30 MISCELLANEOUS 6,600 - - 6,600 0% $ 282,880 $ 475 $ - $ 282,880 0% HO TEL/MO TEL TAX REVENUE FUND (120) 31 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 127,400 $ 3,222 $ - $ 127,400 0% 32 TNTERFUND SUBSIDIES 4,000 - - 4,000 0% S 131,400 S 3,222 S - $ 131,400 0% EMPLO YEE PARKING PERMIT FUND (121) 33 SUPPLIES $ 1,790 $ $ $ 1,790 0% 34 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 25,090 25,090 0% $ 26,880 S S - S 26,880 0111, YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP FUND (122) 35 MISCELLANEOUS $ 3,000 S $ 75 $ 2,925 3% $ 3,000 $ - S 75 S 2,925 ° TO URISM PRO MO TIONAL FUND/ARTS (123) 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 43,400 $ 780 $ - $ 43,400 0% S 43.400 S 780 S - S 43,400 O 1Z O lY t C O O C to O O_ d Q' t C O O C C d E t 0 cc Q 23 Packet Pg. 104 Page 3 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent REAL. ESTATE EXCISETAX 2 (125) I PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $ 760,293 $ - $ 2,685 S 757,608 0% 2 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 1.132.992 7,349 5,928 1,127,064 1% 3 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 1,060 - - 1,060 0% 4 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 566,300 655 565,645 0% $ 2,460,645 5 7,348 S 9,268 S 2,451,377 0% REAL ESTATE EXCISETAX 1 (126) 5 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 7 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 8 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 9 INTEREST GIFTS CATALOG FUND (127) 10 SALARIES AND WAGES 11 OVERTIME 12 BENEFITS 13 UNIFORMS 14 SUPPLIES 15 SMALL EQUIPMENT 16 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17 RENT AL/LEASE 18 MISCELLANEOUS 19 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES CEMETERY MAINTENANCFAMPRO VEMFNT (130) 20 SALARIES AND WAGES 21 OVERTIME 22 BENEFITS 23 UNIFORMS 24 SUPPLIES 25 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 27 COMMUNICATIONS 28 TRAVEL 29 RENTAL/LEASE 30 UTILITIES 31 REPAIRS& MAINTENANCE 32 MISCELLANEOUS C EVIE EERY MAINTENANC E TRUS T FUND (13 7) 33 SMALL EQUIPMENT SISTER CITY COMMISSION (138) 34 SUPPLIES 35 TRAVEL 36 MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS IMPRO VEVIENT DISTRICT FUND (140) 37 SUPPLIES 38 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 39 MISCELLANEOUS EDMONDS RESCUEPLAN FUND (142) 40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE FUND (143) 41 SUPPLIES 42 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 43 LAND $ 295,291 $ $ 855 $ 294,436 0% 680,288 - 680,288 0% 141,026 141,026 0% 165,700 165,700 0% 97,050 - 97,050 0% $ 1,379,355 5 5 855 S 1,378,500 0% $ 269,146 $ $ 16,046 $ 253,100 6% - - 0% 127,000 - 6,469 120,531 5% 2,240 - - 2,240 0% 170,000 2,272 2,478 167,522 1% 500 - - 500 0% 32,500 - - 32,500 0% 16,660 1,459 1,388 15,272 8% 600 - - 600 0% - 0% S 618,646 $ 3.731 S 26,382 S 592,264 4% $ 152,092 $ 23,988 $ 10,101 $ 141,991 7% 3,500 - 234 3,266 7% 82,132 6,277 1,627 80,505 2% 11120 - - 1,120 0% 7,000 164 1,765 5,235 25% 20,000 1,006 18,994 5% 4,200 793 - 4,200 0% 1,700 144 144 1,556 8% 500 - - 500 0% 8,250 795 709 7,541 9% 5,565 253 9 5,556 0% 500 - - 500 0% 4,000 - - 4,000 0% $ 290,559 S 32,414 S 15,594 $ 274,965 5% $ 25,000 $ $ $ 25,000 0% 25,000 S S - S 25,000 06/. $ 1,500 4,500 5,900 $ - $ - $ - - 1,500 4,500 5,900 0% 0% 0% $ 11,900 $ S - $ 11,900 0% $ 10,750 88,425 4,370 $ $ 17 $ 10,750 88,425 4,370 0% 0% 0% 103,545 17 S 4 /o $ 6,550.000 $ 241,583 $ 1,834,084 $ 4,715,916 28°/ y 6,5 5 1,000 S 241,583 S 1.834.084 6 $ 1,000 14,800 199,000 $ - $ - $ - - 1,000 14,800 199,000 00/( 0°/ 00/( S214,800 S 24 Packet Pg. 105 7.2.a Page 4 of 6 C ITY O F EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spcnt 2012 LTGO DEBTSERVIC FUND (231) 1 GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND $ 240,000 $ $ $ 240,000 0% 2 INTEREST 70.420 70.420 0% 10.42(i S - b $ 310,420 0% PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (332) 3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 5 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 6 INTEREST WATER FUND (421) 7 SALARIES AND WAGES 8 OVERTIME 9 BENEFIT S 10 UNIFORMS 11 SUPPLIES 12 WATER PURCHASED FOR RESALE 13 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 14 SMALL EQUIPMENT 15 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16 COMMUNICATIONS 17 TRAVEL 18 EXCISE TAXES 19 RENTAL/LEASE 20INSURANCE 21 UTILITIES 22 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 23 MISCELLANEOUS 24 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 25 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 26 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 27 REVENUE BONDS 28 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 29 INTEREST STO RM FUND (422) 30 SALARIES AND WAGES 31 OVERTIME 32 BENEFITS 33 UNIFORMS 34 SUPPLIES 35 SMALL EQUIPMENT 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37 COMMUNICATIONS 38 TRAVEL 39 EXCISE TAXES 40 RENTAL/LEASE 41 INSURANCE 42 UTILITES 43 REPAIR&MAINTENANCE 44 MISCELLANEOUS 45 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 46 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 47 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 48 REVENUE BONDS 49 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 50 INTEREST $ - $ 2,938 $ $ - U 39,535 138,526 - 39,535 0% 55,000 - - 55,000 0% 45,150 - - 45,150 0% $ 139,685 b 141,463 $ - 5 139,685 0% $ 1,126,709 $ 167,623 $ 71,935 $ 1,054,774 6% 24,000 253 2,814 21,186 12% 505,643 43,274 35,399 470,244 7% 4,000 551 1,311 2,689 33% 150,000 227 8,308 141,692 6% 2,398,000 - - 2,398,000 0% 180,000 11,871 19,471 160,529 11 % 22,460 - - 22,460 0% 2,707,750 28,111 43,408 2,664,342 2% 35,000 1,095 2,633 32,367 8% 200 - - 200 0% 1,487,289 118,468 125,737 1,361,552 8% 189,052 15,339 15,428 173,624 8% 135,625 225,379 139,740 (4,115) 103% 35,000 2,993 3,574 31,426 10% 216,130 11,338 10,508 205,622 5% 203,600 14,514 23,049 180,551 11% 642,130 - - 642,130 0% 2,955,000 47,283 - 2,955,000 0% 2,970 - - 2,970 0% 353,590 - - 353,590 0% 25,840 - 25,840 0% 168,420 - - 168,420 0% $ 13,568,408 $ 688,320 $ 503,314 S 13,065,094 4% $ 1,013,672 $ 198,434 $ 104,456 $ 909,216 10% 26,000 1,415 150 25,850 1% 413,048 51,177 33,425 379,623 8% 6,500 - 2,118 4,382 33% 46,000 1,000 801 45,199 2% 4,000 - - 4,000 0% 3,200,481 27,176 34,811 3,165,670 1% 3,200 24 467 2,733 15% 41300 - - 4,300 0% 754,196 47,866 53,689 700,507 7% 314,693 23,976 25,762 288,931 8% 110,972 31,680 114,339 (3,367) 1030/c 13,125 1,603 2,016 11,109 15% 289,130 10,796 10,508 278,622 4% 240,300 14,169 15,277 225,023 6% 279,560 - - 279,560 00/( 1,345,000 - - 1,345,000 00/c 108,240 - - 108,240 00/c 168,500 - - 168,500 00/( 61,600 - 61,600 00/( 92,640 - 92,640 00/( S 8,495.157 $ 409,316 S 397,818 S 8,097,339 50A O Q O t C O L cc 3 C ca O CL O t C O ca 3 C ca C d t 0 ca Q 25 Park+ Pn 1 f1R 7.2.a Page 5 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent SEWER FUND (423) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 3,111,357 $ 440,524 $ 259,732 $ 2,851,625 8% 2 OVERTIME 130,000 23,412 18,966 111,034 15% 3 BENEFITS 1,199,819 122,066 93,702 1,106,117 8% 4 UNIFORMS 11,500 888 1,601 9,899 14% 5 SUPPLIES 571,500 46,146 15,224 556,276 3% 6 FUEL CONSUMED 20,000 - - 20,000 0% 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INV OR RESALE 5,000 - - 5,000 0% 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 75,000 642 - 75,000 0% 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,811,500 93,468 76,216 4,735,284 2% 10 COMMUNICATIONS 48,000 1,476 3,309 44,691 7% 11 TRAVEL 5,000 - - 5,000 0% 12 EXCISE TAXES 1,338,814 105,265 119,748 1,219,066 9% 13 RENTAL/LEASE 438,031 25,451 35,861 402,170 8% 14 INSURANCE 553,988 360,663 570,794 (16,806) 103% 15 UTILITIES 1,972,060 74,201 81,190 1,890,870 4% 16 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 600,630 19,061 65,067 535,563 11% 17 MISCELLANEOUS 338,350 27,134 31,597 306,753 9% 18 INTERFUND SUBSIDIES 3,066,814 - - 3,066,814 0% 19 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 1,580,000 - - 1,580,000 0% 20 CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS 2,202,000 - - 2,202,000 0% 21 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 130,980 - 130,980 0% 22 REVENUE BONDS 57,930 - - 57,930 0% 23 INTERGOVERNMENTAL LOANS 104,730 - - 104,730 0% 24 INTEREST 347,240 - - 347,240 0% S 22,720,243 S 1,340,398 S 1,373,009 $ 21,347,234 6% BOND RESERVE FUND (424) 25 REVENUE BONDS $ 875,020 $ - $ - $ 875,020 0% 26 INTEREST 1,113,810 - - 1,113,810 0% $ 1,988,830 5 - $ - S 1,98 ,930 0% 26 Packet Pg. 107 7.2.a Page 6 of 6 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES BY FUND - DETAIL 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (511) 1 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 425,142 $ 75,618 $ 36,332 $ 388,810 9% 2 OVERTIME 2,000 - - 2,000 0% 3 BENEFITS 155,443 18,292 13,058 142,385 8% 4 UNIFORMS 1,500 80 65 1,435 4% 5 SUPPLIES 149,120 2,146 8,366 140,754 6% 6 FUEL CONSUMED 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 7 SUPPLIES PURCHASED FOR INVENTORY/RESALE 458,880 50,024 7,635 451,245 2% 8 SMALL EQUIPMENT 58,000 - - 58,000 0% 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 47,500 192 138 47,362 0% 10 COMMUNICATIONS 3,000 138 346 2,654 12% 11 TRAVEL 1,000 - - 1,000 0% 12 RENTAL/LEASE 16,830 1,399 1,343 15,487 8% 13 INSURANCE 70,797 50,178 72,881 (2,084) 103% 14 UTILITIES 24,000 2,681 2,793 21,207 12% 15 REP AIRS & MAINTENANCE 60,000 3,851 5,320 54,680 9% 16 MISCELLANEOUS 12,000 623 635 11,365 5% 17 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 490,000 218,681 - 490,000 0% 5 1,976,212 S 423,902 5 148.912 $ 1,827,300 8% TECHNOLOGY RENTAL FUND (512) 18 SALARIES AND WAGES $ 654,329 $ 40,955 $ 48,279 $ 606,050 7% 19 OVERTIME 2,000 - - 2,000 0% 20 BENEFITS 226,298 12,215 19,193 207,105 8% 21 SUPPLIES 5,000 78 126 4,874 3% 22 SMALL EQUIPMENT 220,300 (1,447) 8,750 211,550 4% 23 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61,860 - - 61,860 0% 24 COMMUNICATIONS 58,770 4,213 2,952 55,818 5% 25 TRAVEL 1,500 - - 1,500 0% 26 RENTAL/LEASE 5,190 137 183 5,008 4% 27 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 664,229 299,495 370,941 293,288 56% 28 MISCELLANEOUS 55,600 - - 55,600 0% 29 MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT 56,000 - - 56,000 0% S 2,011,076 S 355,645 $ 450,425 S 1.560.651 TOTAL EXPENDITURE ALL FUNDS S 124,150,146 5 9.076,775 S 9,916,045 S 114,234,101 Q 27 Packet Pg. 108 7.2.a Page 1 of 1 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN SUMMARY Title 2024 Adopted Budget 1/31/2023 Expenditures 1/31/2024 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent CITY COUNCIL $ 479,286 $ 33,649 $ 40,574 $ 438,712 8% OFFICE OF MAYOR 490,875 32,343 33,901 456,974 7% HUMAN RESOURCES 1,222,438 93,116 129,960 1,092,478 11% MUNICIPAL COURT 1,811,176 114,975 136,698 1,674,478 8% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2,825,453 253,437 274,596 2,550,857 10% CITY ATTORNEY 1,161,780 24,570 - 1,161,780 0% NON -DEPARTMENTAL 6,857,495 1,642,894 1,244,387 5,613,108 18% POLICE SERVICES 17,478,540 1,041,369 1,320,779 16,157,761 8% SATELLITE OFFICE 172,105 8,786 11,538 160,567 7% COMMUNITY SERVICESIECONOMIC DEV. 1,162,045 84,200 84,711 1,077,334 7% PLANNING& DEVELOPMENT 4,251,605 286,492 269,177 3,982,428 6% HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM 320,940 11,995 13,526 307,414 4% PARKS & RECREATION 6,520,597 589,720 453,277 6,067,320 7% PUBLIC WORKS 4,500,279 316,193 358,635 4,141,644 8% FACILITIES MAINTENANCE 2,638,179 335,018 280,811 2,357,368 11% $ 51,892,793 $ 4,868,760 $ 4,652,570 $ 47,240,223 9% CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - UTILITY- BY FUND IN SUMMARY Title 2024 Adopted Budget 1/31/2023 Expenditures 1/31/2024 Expenditures Amount Remaining %Spent WATER UTILITYFUND $ 13,568,408 $ 688,320 $ 503,314 $ 13,065,094 4% STORM UTILITY FUND 8,495,157 409,316 397,818 8,097,339 5% SEWER/WWTP UTILITY FUND 22,720,243 1,340,398 1,373,009 21,347,234 6% BOND RESERVE FUND 1,988,830 - - 1,988,830 0% $ 46,772,638 $ 2,438,035 $ 2,274,141 $ 44,498,497 5% 28 Packet Pg. 109 PI.f2 C ITY O F IDMO NDS Pag EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMENT IN DETAIL 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent C ITY C O UNC H, SALARIES AND WAGES $ 253,724 $ 18,593 $ 21,296 $ 232,428 8% BENEFITS 106,715 8,644 14,970 91,745 14% SUPPLIES 1,462 69 81 1,381 6% SERVICES 117385 6,342 4.227 113.158 4% $ 479,286 $ 33,649 $ 40,574 $ 438,712 8%. O FFIC E O F MAYO R SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES MUNICIPAL C O URT SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFITS SUPPLIES SERVICES ADMINISTRATIVE SERVIC ES SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES CITY ATTO RNEY SERVICES NON -DEPARTMENTAL SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES INTERFUND SUBSIDIES DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL DEBT SERVICE- INTEREST POLICESERVICES SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES DEBT SERVICE - PRINCIPAL SATELLITE O FFIC E SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES $ 302,809 $ 21,423 $ 23,423 $ 279,386 8% 96,402 7,476 7,629 88,773 8% 1,097 265 104 993 9% 90,567 3.179 2,744 87.823 3% $ 490,875 $ 32,343 $ 33,901 $ 456,974 7% $ 752,306 $ 43,217 $ 53,124 $ 699,182 7% 241,822 15,560 20,351 221,471 8% 10,026 - 172 9,854 2% 218,284 34.340 56.313 161,971 26% $ 1,222,438 $ 93,116 $ 129,960 $ 1,092,478 11% $ 1,137,525 $ 80,791 $ 84,316 $ 1,053,209 7% 349,462 25,506 28,789 320,673 8% 11,600 - - 11,600 0% 312,589 8,677 23.592 288,997 8% $ 1,811,176 $ 114,975 $ 136,698 $ 1,674,478 8% $ 1,886,891 $ 134,674 $ 142,090 $ 1,744,801 8% 539,701 39,141 45,251 494,450 8% 11,965 105 1,539 10,426 13% 386.896 79,518 85.716 301.180 22% $ 2,825,453 $ 253.437 $ 274,596 $ 2.550.857 10% $ 1.161.780 $ 24.570 $ $ 1,161,780 0% $ 1,161,780 $ 24,570 $ $ 1,161,780 0% $ (2,100,000) $ - $ - $ (2,100,000) 0% (805,332) 16,905 4,628 (809,960) 0% 5,000 - - 5,000 0% 8,761,427 1,625,989 1,239,759 7,521,668 14% 675,000 - - 675,000 0% 197,120 - - 197,120 0% 124,280 124.280 0% $ 6,857,495 $ 1,642.894 $ 1,244,387 $ 5,613,108 18% $ 11,085,782 $ 667,834 $ 834,888 $ 10,250,894 8% 3,799,900 245,766 317,002 3,482,898 8% 276,426 1,852 2,161 274,265 1% 2,016,432 125,917 166,728 1,849,704 8% 300,000 - 300,000 0% $ 17,478,540 $ 1,041,369 $ 1,320.779 $ 16,157,761 8% 45,689 $ 3,640 $ 3,807 $ 41,882 8% 31,570 692 2,844 28,726 9% 12,000 - - 12,000 0% 82,846 4,454 4,886 77,960 6% $ 172,105 $ 8,786 $ 11,538 $ 160,567 7% 29 Packet Pg. 110 I 7.2.a I Page 2 of 2 CITY OF EDMO NDS EXPENDITURES - GENERAL FUND - BY DEPARTMFNTIN DETAIL 2024 Adopted 1/31/2023 1/31/2024 Amount Title Budget Expenditures Expenditures Remaining %Spent COMMUNITY SERVICES/ECON DEV. SALARIES AND WAGES $ 673,413 $ 52,358 $ 56,531 $ 616,882 8% BENEFIT S 168,009 13,447 16,770 151,239 10% SUPPLIES 233 - 72 161 31% SERVICES 320,390 18,396 11.338 309,052 4% $ 1,162,045 $ 84,200 $ 84,711 $ 1,077,334 7% PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAM SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFITS SUPPLIES SERVICES PARKS & REC REATIO N SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES FACILITIES MAINTENANCE SALARIES AND WAGES BENEFIT S SUPPLIES SERVICES MACHINERY/EQUIPMENT $ 2,394,050 $ 182,385 $ 166,784 $ 2,227,266 7% 870,471 64,899 63,741 806,730 7% 15,879 171 - 15,879 0% 971,205 39,038 38.652 932,553 4% $ 4,251,605 $ 286,492 $ 269,177 $ 3,982,428 6% $ 121,472 $ 9,290 $ 10,203 $ 111,269 8% 34,330 2,670 3,107 31,223 9% 10,968 - - 10,968 0% 154,170 35 217 153,953 0% 11,995 S 13,526 $ 307,414 4% $ 3,394,355 $ 403,588 $ 256,349 $ 3,138,006 8% 1,200,364 109,575 104,654 1,095,710 9% 433,980 3,630 5,797 428,183 1% 1,491,898 72,926 86.477 1,405,421 6% $ 6,520,597 $ 589,720 $ 453,277 $ 6,067,320 7% $ 422,973 $ 34,412 $ 46,434 $ 376,540 11% 128,003 10,535 15,259 112,744 12% 8,740 2,684 635 8,105 7% 162,710 7,144 13,227 149,483 8% $ 722,426 $ 54,775 $ 75,554 $ 646,872 10% 1,132,741 217,058 99,554 1,033,187 9% 488,518 59,632 41,977 446,541 9% 115,500 7,629 4,301 111,199 4% 901,420 50,699 100,940 800,480 11% 34,040 (34,040) 0% $ 21638,179 $ 335,018 $ 280,811 $ 2,357,368 11% ENGINEERING SALARIES AND WAGES $ 2,528,734 $ 182,468 $ 186,877 $ 2,341,857 7% BENEFITS 887,072 63,838 70,208 816,864 8% SUPPLIES 2,200 - - 2,200 0% SERVICES 359,847 15,113 25,996 333,851 7% $ 3,777,853 $ 261,418 $ 283.081 $ 3,494,772 7% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 51,892,793 $ 4,868,760 $ 4,652,570 $ 47,240,223 9% 30 Packet Pg. 111 7.2.a GENERAL FUND SUBFUNDS OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GENERAL FUND --- ESTIMATES ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- SUBFUNDS 1 /31 /2024 1 /31 /2024 011 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 009-Leoff-Medical Ins. Reserve 123,405 123,405 (25,348) 011-Risk Management Reserve Fund - - 012-Contingency Reserve Fund 2,228,672 2,228,672 014-Historic Preservation Gift Fund 8,944 8,944 016-Building Maintenance 3,681,471 3,681,471 (128,572) 017 - Marsh Restoration & Preservation 853,795 853,795 200 018 - Edmonds Homelessness Response Fd 200,000 200,000 - 0 019 - Opioid Response Fund 74,119 74,119 Total General Fund Subfunds $ 7,170,406 $ 7,170,406 $ $ (153,719) w c 0 There are no interfund loans outstanding at this time. c GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW o w 0 BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL ---- ESTIMATES ---- ---- ACTUAL ---- M FUNDS 1 /31 i2024 1 /31 /2024 (0-1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance c d General Fund Subfunds $ 7,170,406 $ 7,170,406 $ (153,719) t Special Revenue 13,768,651 20,079,880 55,556 M Capital Projects - Fund 332 168,037 159,273 30,104 Q Total $ 21,107,094 $ 27,409,559 $ $ (68,060: Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. I 31 Packet Pg. T2 7.2.a SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL ---- ESTIMATES --- --- ACTUAL -- SPECIAL REVENUE 1 /31 /2024 1 /31 /2024 Q1 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 104 - Drug Enforcement Fund $ 40,610 $ 40,610 $ 292 111 - Street Fund (376,998) (345,917) (237,952) 112 - Com bined Street Const/Im prove 1,853,251 1,218,217 39,657 117 - Municipal Arts Acquis. Fund 653,483 653,483 4,702 120 - Hotel/Motel Tax Revenue Fund 142,482 142,482 9,099 121 - Employee Parking Permit Fund 89,919 89,919 7,182 122 - Youth Scholarship Fund 17,691 17,766 53 123 -Tourism Promotional Fund/Arts 134,817 134,817 3,627 a- 125 - Real Estate Tax 2,059,779 2,111,199 85,516 IY 126 - Real Estate Excise Tax 1 " 4,014,080 4,014,080 107,450 % 127 - Gifts Catalog Fund 3,095,630 3,095,630 (4,242) _ 0 130- Cemetery Maintenance/improvement 189,541 189,561 (4,033) 137 - Cemetery Maintenance Trust Fund 1,206,330 1,206,330 9,790 138 - Sister City Com mission 18,571 18,571 134 140 - Business Improvement Disrict 62,170 62,170 23,822 141 -Affordable and Supportive Housing Fd 309,127 309,127 8,397 142 - Edmonds Rescue Plan Fund 37,349 6,901,015 417 0 0 143 - Tree Fund 220,820 220,820 1,646 Total Special Revenue $ 13,768,651 $ 20,079,880 $ $ 55,556 >, *$200,000 fund balance in Fund 126 has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding, as well as $1,000,000 w of the for the purchase of Open Space. 0 ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW _ _ E BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES ENTERPRISE --- ESTIMATES ---- --- ACTUAL --- Q FUNDS 1 /31 /2024 1 /31 /2024 011 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 421 -Water Utility Fund $ 33,272,522 $ 10,373,086 $ 587,057 422 -Storm Utility Fund* 18,810,709 6,863,386 144,529 423 - Sewer/ W TP Utility Fund 61,366,899 15,265,882 103,330 424 - Bond Reserve Fund 864,341 864,341 2,147 411 - Combined Utility Operation 12,430 70,425 12,430 Total Enterprise Funds $ 114,326,901 $ 33,437,120 $ $ 849,493 *$250,000 of the Storm Utility Fund Balance has been reserved for Marsh Restoration Funding. *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 32 Packet Pg. T3 7.2.a INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS OVERVIEW BALANCES CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES INTERNAL SERVICE --- ESTIMATES -- --- ACTUAL --- FUNDS 1 /31 /2024 1 /31 /2024 CL11 YTD Fund Balance Cash Balance 511 - Equipment Rental Fund $ 9,584,878 $ 5,298,063 $ 100,707 512 -Technology Rental Fund 465,059 169,176 (268,858) Total Internal Service Funds $ 10,049,937 $ 5,467,239 $ (168,150) Q *Please note that these revenues and expenses occur within annual cycles. This Interim Report is not adjusted for accruals or those annual cycles. 33 — Packet Pg. 114 7.2.a N N m y Q 4 T O m N W lll n W N ti yi .r w O A d o C n N v "I m m ry v V VWrq pp O� LL N O m ^ Y M ool3�,H8HHH �Op 80 � n ti n h h Si LL m a .. HER v 0 o ry O 75 o O O J N "rye RaSt�tlet v m y LL l aoq�vm m o Q n O W m t\ m S b m a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O LL y H� A n yQj Q N� R ~ n N N n n co W r N U N v' 3 g O u h m m ry o m m W ry m o m 16 m ul N N� v V C t A yt u ;:i O O m C x u LL O N a X " E (, - U W O ob n c O U N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N i yi v ai �i h �i o �u � 'i o vi v ad m m m M �0 W m O n o 0 o O� m a N b N m Q m Q m Q T n n ut o W Q v �j yS v �ri ao v ni m .-i n o o� ai o W yi � ri n o r a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Li 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O �1 N M m N N O N T m n m yl m u1 m yt T yl m m m y1 W N 1� b m M O N b O O m h m 1O ry e m m W b rvLQ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 16 "i yi a aj N � C m N N ul N yl m b m O N m o m O b O Qi 1p A O N n vi yl q;n e.� oNry.+ m QmQ ry � nj 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ri N d o ad v iti ry of � �i e v yi o w o m �m o ry ry ry o ry � m N ry ry ry m m W o y� o Q m b m m �n b Q W N o o n le b ll�T O Oj � ,y I� M � Q OW �� 16 N Q O b DO M ,l N N e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o H H 8 8 8 0 0 �ym1l m Q O Iq I+f 10 yi m N Di N �j n n W N O .-i O 01 yl N W b N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 o ,,,, ti R n W O O 'V . O O m rOi W W� ry n` 16 i . Ql 01 �O O Q N Vl O1 m N u�l a O O O o 0 0 0 o O o O O ^ OW1 ^ Omj b a O O O O O O O O O g Q Q H H H O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tv7 v O O O O i o0 yj f\ V W aoo ovoo �w m a o y 0 0 O o o O o o J O Otr�� tr Wpp i ymj 0 n b NH N N N C1 ti N. ry 00 V o m m cc N b o Q W N o o m m �-: Id-6 mNry io n O ry a? m allomnM..'m W b n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ H 00 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 ni ^ O O H O e 0nppp{ q uC�( I Q b b O O Q u1 O IA N O O O 16 I N ti n h N N N H lmo M N •~-I a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O yi I+o vi �i a ro m �i Ri o a I n m m nl m N N m T W m m O O N n m N 0 0 O N .y ti Q O N W H W Q at O� u1 n b N N Q yl . O1 M Cj W R K m O R R yi R m Ql W m T N Q W T O M N W m N m N m N T 0 y Q b m m m Q m m n b n LQ W h m O O j b Is n �1 � .-j R ^; N j O N ap b m O to f N O L w a u E - y Y a En a u N n a a o 2 m 7 as vi U O Q NN4) L7� t C O 3 C c� yv.I L O CL NO 1.6 t CO G cu 3 _ cu C 4) 0 cu w Q Packet Pg. 115 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY City of Edmonds Investment Portfolio Detail As of January 31, 2024 Years Agency/ Issuer Investment Type Purchase Price to Maturity Par Value Market Value Maturity Date Coupon Rate FHLB Bonds 954,866 0.19 1,000,000 990,515 04/10/24 0.35% FM Bonds 996,082 0.38 1,000,000 990,360 06/17/24 2.80% FNMA Bonds 992,693 0.42 1,000,000 985,417 07/02/24 1 75% FFCB Bonds 1,960,906 062 2,000,000 1,980,007 09/13/24 3.50% FHLB Bonds 950,774 0.80 1,000,000 966,143 11/18/24 0.90% Spokane County WA Bonds 207,260 0.84 200,000 195,326 12/01/24 2 10% First Financial - Waterfront Center CD 245,000 091 245,000 245,000 12/27/24 2.47% FHLMC Bonds 974,798 1.12 1,000,000 988,290 03/13/25 3 75% Farmer Mac Bonds 1,995,088 1.21 2,000,000 1,987,416 04/17/25 425% FHLB Bonds 969,524 1.49 1,000,000 986,091 07/28/25 3.60% US Treasury Note Note 964,597 1 54 1,000,000 979,414 08/15/25 313% FFCB Bonds 1,982,692 1.85 2,000,000 1,986,639 12/08/25 4.13% Farmer Mac Bonds 1,994,172 2.01 2,000,000 1,984,322 02/02/26 3.95% FHLMC Bonds 993,661 2.47 1,115,000 1,020,976 07/22/26 0.83% Farmer Mac Bonds 2,057,309 2.80 2,305,000 2,117,373 11/17/26 1 15% First Financial - ECA CD 2,803,516 3.79 2,803,516 2,803,516 11/15/27 2.96% TOTAL SECURITIES 21,042,939 1.40 21,668,516 21,206,805 Washington State Local Gov't Investment Pool 27,481,195 27,481,195 Demand 5 42% Snohorrish County Local Gov't Investment Pool 11,529,768 11,529,768 Demand 2.44% TOTAL PORTFOLIO $ 60,679,479 $ 60,217,768 Issuer Diversification 0` Spokane County Farmer WA, 1% Mac, 29% i, FFCB, 18% 4FHHLKjAC, Cash and Investment Balances Checking, (in $ Millions) Note, $1.00, 2% Bonds, $17.62, — CD's, $3.05 27% State LGI NVO ,5% $27.48 County 41% LGIP, $11.53 , 17% 34 Packet Pg. 116 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY 7.2.a $2,000,000 $1,500, 000 $1,000, 000 $500,000 $- Annual Interest Income $1 236 875 $947,931 2019 2020 72 2021 2022 2023 $224,417 _jw YTD 2024 I 35 Packet Pg. 117 7.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Council Appointment to a Board/Commission Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Volunteer boards and commissions serve our community by providing advice and recommendations to the Mayor and City Council regarding programs, activities, and issues unique to their mission and purpose. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative Councilmember Neil Tibbott appoints Pete Spear to the Economic Development Commission. Councilmember Will Chen appoints Carrie Mandak to the Economic Development Commission. Attachments: Spear_Econ Dev_Redacted Packet Pg. 118 I 7.3.a I City o f Edmonds Citizen Board and Commission Application (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) NOTE: This form is a public record and maybe subject to disclosure upon request Economic Development (Board or Commission) Name: Pete Spear Address: Edmonds, WA 98020 Date:3/7/2024 Day Phone: Evening Phone: Cell: E-mail: @gmail.com Occupational status and background: I work for 3Cloud LLC v:,hich is a Microsoft Cloud (Azure) consultancy. We work with commercial customers to modernize their IT infrastructure and applications in Microsoft's cloud. We also get involved with Al and data analytics projects which I hope will be a focus for Edmonds as a city going forward! Organizational affiliations: Edmonds Civic Roundtable. 101 Club (supports amateur athletics), Year UP Puget Sound Why are you seeking this appointment? I hope to bring a technological focus to economic development through the use of data and data analytics, for example looking at %vhere foot traffic and parking can impact business for retailers, I also enjoy talking to small business owners and understanding their pain points and how we can help them thrive What skills and knowledge do you have to meet the selection criteria? I've been in business development for over 20 years and have a financial analytics background. I hope to bring thesee skills to bear Please list any other Board, Commission, Committee, or official positions you currently hold with the City of Edmonds:. None Additional comments: I look forward to contributing my time and effort towards ensuring Edmonds is a great place to conduct business for owners and consumers alike! Please return this completed form to: Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 carolvn.lafave0edmondswa.eov Phone:425.771.0247 1 Fax: 425.771.0252 Signature Revised 4130114 d a� >I m 0 0 U W I m CL U) _ a) E 0 a Packet Pg. 119 7.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Outside Boards and Committee Reports Staff Lead: Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History Outside Boards and Committee Reports will be submitted to the Received for Filing portion of the agenda for last meeting of the month. Staff Recommendation N/A Narrative The Council is asked to review the attached committee reports/minutes from the following organizations: Snohomish County Tomorrow Port of Edmonds Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Seashore Transportation SnoCom 911 Attachments: _01242024-2180 Snohomish County Tomorrow Commission Meeting Minutes 2-12-24 - Port Of Edmonds Commission Meeting Minutes 2-26-24 - Port Of Edmonds pfd-board-meeting-minutes-01-25-2024 Seashore Agenda 03.01.2024 Seashore Minutes 02.02.2024-1 SNO911-Board-Agenda-20240321 Packet Pg. 120 I 7.4.a I Stanwood Darrington Snohomish County Tomorrow A GROWTH MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, January 24, 2024 Via Zoom 6:00 p.m. MEETING MINUTES Participating Jurisdictions/Members Tulalip Arlington Granite Falls Marysville Tribes Everett Lake Stevens "'"" ' Mill Creek Lynnwood Snohomish Mountlake nonds Terrace Monroe Sultan Gold Index Ddway Brier Bothell Bar City of Darrin ton Mayor Dan Rankin City of Edmonds Councilmember Vivian Olson City of Everett Councilmember Ben Zarlin o City of Gold Bar Councilmember Chuck Lie City of Granite Falls Mayor Matt Hartman City of Lake Stevens Mayor Brett Gaile , PAC -Co Chair Russ Wright City of Lynnwood Mayor Christine Frizzell City of Marysville Councilmember Peter Cond les City of Mill Creek Mayor Pro Tern Stephanie Vi nal City of Monroe Councilmembers Kyle Fisher, Jacob Walker City of Mountlake Terrace Mayor Pro Tern Bryan Wahl City of Mukilteo Jason Moon City of Snohomish Lea Anne Burke City of Woodway John Brock Snohomish County Council Councilmembers Nate Nehrin , Jared Mead Snohomish County Executive Josh Dugan Snohomish County ICC Co -Chair Doug McCormick Community Representative Allan Giffen Community Representative Peter Battuello Community Representative Linda Hoult Community Representative Mike Appleby Other Attendees/Presenters: Snohomish County Human Services Mary Jane Brell Vujovic Snohomish County Eileen Canola Snohomish County Diana Dannoun Snohomish County Molly Beeman Alliance for Housing Affordability Chris Collier Snohomish County Molly Beeman City of Monroe Lance Bailey SCT Manager Ann Larson Economic Alliance of Snohomish County Wendy Poischbeg Packet Pg. 121 7.4.a Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 6:01 pm by Brett Gailey. 2. Introductions/Roll Call Roll call was taken (as listed above). 3. Citizen Comments No comments. 4. Approval of Meeting Minutes (12-6-23) Bryan Wahl moved to approve the minutes. Josh Dugan seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 5. Update Items a. PSRC Board Actions and Activities, Ben Bakkenta was unable to join, but update linked in agenda. b. Economic Alliance Snohomish County Update Wendy Poischbeg, Interim President & CEO, Vice President of Economic Development 6. Briefings, Discussion Items a. Housing and Behavioral Health Capital Fund Investment Plan Update, Mary Jane Brell-Vujovic, Snohomish County Human Services Director b. Snohomish County Office of Energy and Sustainability, Molly Beeman, Environmental and Sustainability Manager c. Tax Increments Financing/City of Arlington, Marc Hayes, Community and Development Director was unable to join but will present at February's meeting d. SCT Manager's Report SCT Manager Ann Larson shared the SCT Committee's Report 7. Next Meeting Date February 28, 2024 8. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 7:27pm by Brett Gailey All presentations given, discussions held, and actions taken at this meeting are kept on file (via recording) in PDS until six years Packet Pg. 122 7.4.a from December 3111 of this year. N O O_ d w d d E E O U c N L O m d .y w O 3 O L L O E O O U t E O t O c U) O CO N N O N ql N O I C d E t O Q Packet Pg. 123 3/19/24, 3:32 PM Commission Meeting Minutes 2-12-24 - Port Of Edmonds PORT COMMISSION OF THE PORT OF EDMONDS MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING (Zoom —Hybrid Meeting) February 12, 2024 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Jay Grant, President David Preston, Vice President 0 Janelle Cass, Secretary a Steve Johnston m r Selena Killin E E 0 U STAFF PRESENT Angela Harris, Executive Director 0 Brandon Baker, Deputy Executive Director m Brittany Williams, Manager of Properties and Economic a� N r 3 Development 0 Tsz Yan Brady, Director of Finance and Administration M OTHERS PRESENT Jordan Stephens, Port Attorney Will Chen, Edmonds City Council I. CALL TO ORDER President Grant called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. FLAG SALUTE All those in attendance participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COMMISSIONER PRESTON MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS SUBMITTED. COMMISSIONER CASS SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS --- - - r-- I - -- — - - - - - ,- - .,- - r- - -= — - https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-2-12-24/ I Packet Pg. 124 3/19/24, 3:32 PM Commission Meeting Minutes 2-12-24 - Port Of Edmonds l,omment Trom F'uget JOuna Anglers inanKing ine HOri OT LOmonos for the partnership and providing overview of the areas the Port and Puget Sound Anglers partner and insights into upcoming events this year. V. CONSENT AGENDA COMMISSIONER KILLIN MOVED THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: APPROVAL OF JANUARY 29 AND JANUARY 31, 2024 MEETING MINUTES APPROVAL OF PAYMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $342,783.23 RESOLUTION NO. 24-04 APPROVAL OF AUTHORIZING SALE OF 3 ABANDONED BOATS COMMISSIONER JOHNSTON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. VI. PRESENTATION A. An Update from the Corinthian Yacht Club of Edmonds Mike Fitch, current Commodore of the Corinthian Yacht Club of Edmonds (CYCE) provided a brief history of CYCE and recapped the 2023 season. He also provided a look ahead to 2024, including club activities at the Port of Edmonds. VII. POSSIBLE ACTION A. Approval of a contribution to the City of Edmonds for the National Coastal Resilience Grant local match for the Edmonds Marsh Study Executive Director Harris provided background on the request from the Marsh Estuary Advocates for financial support from the Port of Edmonds to the City of Edmonds for a grant awarded to the City for further data analysis for the Edmonds Marsh in the case of future daylighting. 7.4.b https://www.portofed monds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-2-12-24/ Packet Pg. 125 3/19/24, 3:32 PM Commission Meeting Minutes 2-12-24 - Port Of Edmonds THE COMMISSION RAISED QUESTIONS THEY HAVE BEFORE THEY ARE READY TO VOTE ON THIS ITEM. The questions raised included finding out the total amount for the consultants as well as the process of selection, when the community match funds need to be available, and the timing of the study relative to the property clean-up and subsequent presumed sale. Vill. INFORMATION A. Marketing & Communications Annual Review Manager Williams highlighted 2023 events and communication pieces, as well as the results from various marina programs and promotions. She also provided an overview of the 2024 marketing and communications strategy. B. 2023 Preliminary Financial Report Director Brady reviewed the 2023 preliminary financial report. Financial highlights for 2023 included: • Marina revenues/other income increased from 2022 by $0.5 million or 6%. • Rental Property revenues/other income increased from 2022 by $0.2 million or 8%. • The combined Port gross revenue increased from 2022 by $0.8 million or 7% and increased from 2023 budgeted amount by $1.0 million or 9%. • The combined Port gross margin (revenue less cost of goods sold) increased from 2022 by $0.8 million or 9% and increased from 2023 budgeted amount by $0.6 million or 6%. • The combined Port operating expenses (before depreciation and amortization) increased from 2022 by $1.1 million or 22% and decreased from 2023 budgeted amount by $0.3 million or 4%. • The Port has spent $7.3 million on new capital projects in 2023. The completion of the new administrative/maintenance building (Phase 1 of the North Portwalk and Seawall Reconstruction Project) was the main focus as well as other capital maintenance projects. IN/ /-ITV r1r Cr%RAr%KIr1G` A K1r% T/1\A/QI /lr \A/f%r%r%\A/AV MITMf1P]TC https://www. portofedmonds.org/comm ission-meeting-minutes-2-12-24/ Packet Pg. 126 3/19/24, 3:32 PM Commission Meeting Minutes 2-12-24 - Port Of Edmonds 1^. VII 1 \Jr, r-UlMilmul)FUVV I%JVVIV \Jr, VVV\JVVVM1 RCr\Jr%1.3 7.4.b • Councilmember Chen provided a brief update for the City of Edmonds, explaining that Councilmembers Olson and Tibbitt were authorized to speak on behalf of the council with Governor Inslee's office on the future of the Unocal property. He also shared that the City would be having an open house to get public input about DADU's on February 28, 2024. X. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Harris provided an update on the following topics: • North Portwalk & Seawall Reconstruction state funding update — we will know by end of session if we receive any funding this session, with early indicators in the Senate budget being released this week. Depending on the state funding and the current RCO grant parameters we have, we may want to move into contract phase this Fall for a Winter construction on Phase 2. Executive Director Harris also shared that DC planning will be discussed in our next meeting. • Staffing — currently interviewing for maintenance and marina operations, the administration role has been filled. • Communications — discussed monthly memo to commissioners and scheduled or ad hoc meetings, depending on commissioner preference, with each commissioner. • Administration building — gave an update on our move -in this week. • Leasing — provided update that we're continuing to look into options for the Admin building leased space. XI. COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS • Commissioner Cass provided an overview of Port Day in Olympia and her discussions. She also provided an update on the Rotary club presentation she recently gave and mentioned she will attend the Unocal Update from Department of Ecology on Tuesday night. • Commissioner Johnston provided an overview of Port Day in Olympia and his perspective on discussions. He also mentioned he's enjoying the Strategic Planning process, summarized the EASC https://www. portofedmonds.org/comm ission-meeting-minutes-2-12-24/ Packet Pg. 127 3/19/24, 3:32 PM Commission Meeting Minutes 2-12-24 - Port Of Edmonds February 6 Transit Update meeting and will be attending the Unocal Update on February 13. • Commissioner Killin gave an overview of Port Day in Olympia from her perspective and mentioned the importance of our messaging as some in the community are thinking our Portwalk is connected to the Ebb Tide waterfront walkway. • Commissioner Preston thanked staff for the pressure washing of the boardwalk, and then summarized his visit to the Boat Show, the Chamber of Commerce luncheon, and the most recent Edmonds Downtown Alliance meeting. • Commissioner Grant provided a summary of the Boat Show, the legislative day in Olympia, and mentioned that the City's Blue Panel recommendations are expected by June. He also met with the City of Edmonds Mayor and discussed a regionally coordinated disaster plan. XII. ADJOURNMENT The Commission meeting was adjourned at 9:29 p.m. Janelle Cass, Port Commission Secretary TAGS: 2023 Preliminary Financial Report, 2024 Port of Edmonds Commission Meeting Minutes, contribution to the City of Edmonds for the National Coastal Resilience discussion, Marketing & Communications Annual Review, Update from the Corinthian Yacht Club of Edmonds https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-2-12-24/ I Packet Pg. 128 3/19/24, 3:33 PM Commission Meeting Minutes 2-26-24 - Port Of Edmonds PORT COMMISSION OF THE PORT OF EDMONDS MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING (Zoom —Hybrid Meeting) February 26, 2024 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Jay Grant, President David Preston, Vice President 0 Janelle Cass, Secretary a Steve Johnston m r Selena Killin E E 0 U STAFF PRESENT co Angela Harris, Executive Director 0 Brandon Baker, Deputy Executive Director m Brittany Williams, Manager of Properties and Economic a� N r 3 Development 0 Tsz Yan Brady, Director of Finance and Administration OTHERS PRESENT Jordan Stephens, Port Attorney Will Chen, Edmonds City Council John Brock & Jim Willett, Town of Woodway I. CALL TO ORDER President Grant called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. FLAG SALUTE All those in attendance participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to the American Flag. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COMMISSIONER CASS MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDAAS SUBMITTED. COMMISSIONER PRESTON SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-2-26-24/ Packet Pg. 129 3/19/24, 3:33 PM Commission Meeting Minutes 2-26-24 - Port Of Edmonds There were no public comments. V. CONSENT AGENDA COMMISSIONER KILLIN MOVED THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 12, 2024 MEETING MINUTES APPROVAL OF PAYMENTS FOR $245,192.29 RESOLUTION NO. 24-05 RESOLUTION APPOINTING AGENT TO RECEIVE CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES (ADDRESS CHANGE) RESOLUTION NO. 24-06 RECONFIRMING SCHEDULEAND LOCATION OF COMMISSION MEETINGS (ADDRESS CHANGE) COMMISSIONER CASS SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY VI. PRESENTATION A. Puget Sound Express Update Sarah Copley, General Manager & Co -Owner of Puget Sound Express provided an overview of 2023 operations for Puget Sound Express. The review included a background of Puget Sound Express's time and operations while at the Port of Edmonds, details of an economic study done on whale watching in Washington state, insights of the typical whale watching guest and information on their tourism & conservation partners. President Grant recessed the Commission meeting at 7:25 p.m. to address a technology issue. President Grant called the meeting back to order at 7:35 p.m., with all technology issues being resolved. VII. INFORMATION A. Legislative Report Executive Director Harris, along with David Marten and Marian https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-2-26-24/ I Packet Pg. 130 3/19/24, 3:33 PM Commission Meeting Minutes 2-26-24 - Port Of Edmonds Dacca from Elevate Government Affairs, provided an update on the projects the government affairs team is currently focused on as well as the regulatory and funding priorities for this year. Opportunities for Commissioner engagement was discussed as was the upcoming AAPA Legislative Summit. VIII. DISCUSSION A. Naming of Port of Edmonds Commission Room Commissioner Grant introduced the idea of naming the Commission Room after the first secretary of the Commission who held the position for 30 years, T. P. Chittenden. The commission discussed the idea and decision was made to workshop this after the strategic plan is adopted this spring to determine a naming strategy for commission room and public spaces. IX. CITY OF EDMONDS AND TOWN OF WOODWAY REPORTS • Councilmember Chen provided a brief update for the City of Edmonds — commenting on upcoming planning meetings on DADUs. X. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT • Executive Director Harris noted she's attending a stakeholder meeting on the City's Comprehensive Plan process for the Waterfront area prior to the public Waterfront charrette coming and is engaging with the City on Emergency Management. XI. COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS • Commissioner Cass thanked staff for the hard work in making the administration move and provided a brief overview of Department of Ecology's Unocal meeting. She also mentioned the Emergency Planning Meeting on February 29 and attended the Edmonds Economic Development presentation for our North Portwalk and Seawall Reconstruction. • Commissioner Killin attended the EASC meeting and provided an https://www. portofedmonds.org/comm ission-meeting-minutes-2-26-24/ Packet Pg. 131 3/19/24, 3:33 PM Commission Meeting Minutes 2-26-24 - Port Of Edmonds overview of the Edmonds Economic Development meeting. • Commissioner Preston provided an overview of the EASC annual meeting and a family tour of 9 different Washington Ports. • Commissioner Johnston attended the Department of Ecology's Unocal meeting and planning for the AAPA Mission to DC and the upcoming strategic planning continuation. • Commissioner Grant attended the Town of Woodway council meeting and discussed some other non -Port committees he sits on. XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION At 8:44p.m., Commissioner Grant announced that the Commission would move into Executive Session pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1) (i) to review pending litigation to which the agency, the governing body, or member acting in an official capacity is, or is likely to become, a party. Commissioner Grant also announced that the Executive Session would last 15 minutes and conclude at 8:59 p.m. Commissioner Grant announced that at the conclusion of the Executive Session, the Commission would adjourn the meeting with no related announcements or actions taken. XIII. ADJOURNMENT The Commission meeting was adjourned at 8:55 p.m. with no related announcements or actions taken. Janelle Cass Port Commission Secretary TAGS: 2024 Commission Meeting Minutes, legislative report, Naming of Port of Edmonds Commission Room, Puget Sound Express Update, Resolutions 24-05 and 24-06 Address Change https://www.portofedmonds.org/commission-meeting-minutes-2-26-24/ I Packet Pg. 132 7.4.d Edmonds Public Facilities District Board of Directors Meeting January 25, 2024 The Edmonds Public Facilities District Board hybrid meeting convened at 7:32 a.m. in the Edmonds Center for the Arts Green Room, 410 4t" Avenue North, Edmonds, and via Zoom. EPFD Board Members Present ECA Staff Present Ray Liaw, President Kathy Liu, Executive Director Bill Willcock, Vice President Lori Meagher, Associate Executive Director Suzy Maloney David Brewster City Staff Present Wayne Grotheer Dave Turley, Admin. Serv. Director (Ex-Officio) Guests Chris Eck, City Council Liaison 1. Call to Order Board President Liaw called the meeting to order. 2. Land Acknowledgement & Equity Statement Board VP Willcock read the Land Acknowledgement Statement and the Equity Statement. 3. Agenda Review and Approval BOARD MEMBER BREWSTER MOVED TO AMEND THE CONSENT AGENDA TO ADD APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 30, 2023 MINUTES. BOARD VP BOARD VP WILLCOCK SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. BOARD MEMBER BREWSTER MOVED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. BOARD MEMBER GROTHEER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. Board President's Comments Board President Liaw welcomed Councilmember Eck, the new city council liaison to the EPFD. Councilmember Eck said she asked to be the liaison to the EPFD and looked forward to bringing information to/from the council and offered to chat offline. Board President Liaw recognized Kidstock! happening this weekend and thanked everyone who is volunteering. Ms. Meagher advised are over 1500 preregistrations. 5. Public Comment There were no public comments. 6. Consent Agenda Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 25, 2024 Page 1 Packet Pg. 133 7.4.d EPFD Disbursement Report: November & December 2023 EPFD Board Minutes — November 30, 2023 BOARD MEMBER MALONEY MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. BOARD MEMBER BREWSTER SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6. Old Business Prior Action Items Review Ms. Meagher reviewed progress on action items from the previous meeting and identified outstanding items (see Action Items below). Discussion followed regarding staff providing the EPFD Board the ticket sales report each month (does not need to be agenda item), purpose of a joint EPFD Board/Philanthropy Committee meeting, and having the Steering Committee discuss creating a joint operating agreement prior to review by the EPFD Board. December & January Staff Report — Questions/Comments? Board members expressed appreciation for the good work reported in the Staff Report, acknowledged the changing of the guard in some key positions, and welcomed Production Manager King Prescott. 7. PFD Board Business Board Committee Assignments Board President Liaw advised this agenda item was an opportunity to review the external committee liaison roles and possibly change assignments. She identified the following external committees the EPFD engages with: Snohomish County PFD, State Association of PFDs, 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor, Boys & Girls Club Joint Discussion Committee/Taskforce, and Creative District Advisory Board. Board Member Brewster advised he has been appointed to the Creative District Board. 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Board Member Brewster referred to a report at city council regarding the 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor. After using grant funds for a 10% design, the project is being pared down due to cost and other factors. The project is also dependent on campus improvements EPFD/ECA decides to pursue. The project needs a hero, someone leading the effort, galvanizing City resources, etc. Discussion followed regarding EPFD/ECA representation on the committee, $20,000 budgeted in 2022 that was never spent and was reabsorbed into the EPFD budget, and having staff or ECA board members provide the EPFD Board updates and reengaging when plans are made for the ECA campus. Board Member Brewster offered to share the presentation that was provided to the city council. State Association of PFDs - Board Member Brewster Board Member Brewster relayed he will continue to represent the EPFD on this organization. He provided an update on the association, advising Cowlitz PFD Board Member Betty Erickson testified before a legislative committee last week in support of SB 6158 related to extending and amending the PFD legislation and recommended the EPFD also advocate for that legislation Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 25, 2024 Page 2 Packet Pg. 134 7.4.d when meeting with legislators. Cowlitz PFD Board Member Erickson is trying to get the association organized; there are a number of PFDs whose dues are in arrears and the website needs to be updated. He has offered to assist her as needed. Snohomish County PFD - Board President Liaw and Board VP Willcock Board President Liaw advised historically the Board President and Vice -President have attended when they are able and she Board VP Willcock will continue to do so. Board President Board President Liaw and Board VP Willcock were unable to attend their last meeting. Ms. Liu relayed sales tax revenues for Snohomish County are below projections and the Tier 2 allocation also decreased by approximately $35,000 for 2024. The next meeting is April 18 in Everett and the EPFD will host the July 18 meeting. Boys & Girls Club Discussion Group — Board President Liaw & Board Member Grotheer Board President Liaw reported this group has been on hiatus for about a year pending the Mithun study. As the Mithun study may result in recommendations related to a master planning option and the EPFD has state capital funds earmarked for continued master planning related to a partnership with the Boys & Girls Club, discussion regarding that analysis and engagement needs to continue. She suggested Board Member Grotheer and she be the EPFD representatives on this group. Ms. Liu advised she met with Boys & Girls Club of Snohomish County Executive Director Bill Tsoukalas who encouraged her to tour the Edmonds and Mukilteo clubs. Board President Liaw offered to create a bulleted list of what has been done to date. Board President Liaw reviewed committee assignments: ❖ Admin & Finance: Board President Liaw & Board VP Willcock ❖ Philanthropy: Board VP Willock & Board Member Maloney ❖ Facilities & Operations: Board Member Grotheer ❖ Hosting: Board President Liaw ❖ IDEA: Board Member Grotheer ❖ Education & Outreach: Board Member Brewster ❖ Board Governance: no EPFD representation as it is an ECA Board committee ❖ Steering: Board President Liaw & Board VP Willcock Board President Liaw requested staff include a list of internal and external assignments in a future packet. • Board Terms Board President Liaw this is just a reminder of board member terms. Board Member Brewster's term expires this year and he plans to request reappointment. In next five months her term as president and Board VP Willcock's term as VP will end. She encouraged board members to think about those offices. • Youth Protection & Safety Policy Ms. Meagher explained Director of Education and Engagement Diane Ortega brought to leadership's attention the need for this policy due to hosting minors in the facility. The policy addresses any abuse or neglect observed by staff or volunteers as well as provides guidance and parameters regarding the treatment of youth while in ECA programs and on the ECA campus. A draft policy was provided to the board in November. Upon further research of the University of Washington and Harvard's youth programs, the policy was updated and expanded to include a process if neglect or abuse was discovered by a staff member or volunteer and to clearly define Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 25, 2024 Page 3 Packet Pg. 135 7.4.d the treatment of minors while on the ECA campus. As Kidstock! is this weekend and hundreds of kids will be on site, there was a push to get this policy in place. Questions and discussion followed regarding appreciation for the robust policy; concern the policy goes beyond programs ECA controls; concern the policy was formatted as an addendum to the employee handbook but lists board members, volunteers and contractors who are not subject to the employee handbook; concern the board was not in a position to adopt the policy today; training for Kidstock! volunteers that addresses these issues; organizations used as basis for the policy, and organizations that have similar policies. Board members were asked to submit comments/suggestions regarding the proposed policy to Ms. Meagher by February 8. Review of the policy will be on the February EPFD Board agenda. 8. PFD Board Member Reports Education & Outreach Board Member Brewster reported the committee is consumed with Kidstock! Philanthropy Board Member Maloney reported staff is closing out the Gala, talking about the year ahead and thinking strategically beyond the Gala. Activities include grant writing, major gifts, etc. She expressed her appreciation for Ms. Liu's involvement with development. Board VP Willcock reported the committee is reviewing and updating their charter. Revenue assurance from Philanthropy is one of the reasons for the EPFD Board participating in their next meeting and getting a better handle on the outlook for 2024 including strategies the development team will employ. IDEA Board Member Grotheer reported the committee is working on organizational culture and updating the land acknowledgement, as well as working with other local organizations on a community reception. Facilities & Operations Board Member Grotheer reported the committee reviewed the Mithun report. Admin & Finance Board VP Willcock reported the committee is reviewing and updating their charter. The committee continues to provide rigorous review of finances. The committee will also provide feedback to Ms. Meagher on the three policies. Hosting Board President Liaw relayed the committee also reviewed their charter. She suggested the board consider which committees should be official committee of the EPFD as well as research whether any of the internal committees were created by resolution. In reviewing their charter, Hosting realized rental fees should be approved by the EPFD Board annually. 9. Associate Executive Director Update • Operations Update o Interlocal & Administrative Agreements between EPFD and ECA Ms. Meagher requested these be moved to the February EPFD Board meeting. Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 25, 2024 Page 4 Packet Pg. 136 7.4.d o Mclalwain Access Fund Ms. Meagher reported this policy that came about due to interest in providing funds to allow better access to the campus and programs. This draft policy, which addresses funding for three elements 1) hosting (scholarship that reduces the rental rate), 2) IDEA funds (DEI and ADA improvements), and 3) Arts for Everyone and Aunt Betty's Bus Fund. The policy has been discussed by the Hosting Committee and she has reached out to the State Auditor who will provide a recommendation by Friday. Discussion followed regarding coordination between the EPFD and ECA related to this fund, how rental rate discounts would be addressed in the EPFD's budget, ECA policy related to how the funds are utilized, additional work effort for staff as an ECA managed fund, process for reporting the use of funds from the Mclalwain Access Fund, and the Hosting Committee's participation in administration of the funds. • Human Resources Update o Board/Staff EEO Survey Ms. Meagher relayed the packet includes a voluntary survey that is conducted with staff to track demographics as part of the commitment to the APAP REDI Pledge. The survey has also been shared with the ECA Board to collect demographics for board members which is often requested when writing grants. She requested the boards complete the survey annually along with staff to track demographics for funders, board recruitment, and the IDEA Action Plan. The survey contains standard EEOC questions. o Hiring Update Ms. Meagher reported a new production manager, King Prescott, has been hired and starts today A part-time accounting associate and a rental event assistant are also being hired. o Policy Updates Ms. Meagher advised Pets at the Workplace and Children at the Workplace policies are included in the packet for review. The policies have been reviewed by Admin & Finance, and will be reviewed by the PFD attorney and insurance carrier. Board members were asked to submit comments/suggestions regarding the proposed policies to Ms. Meagher by February 8. Review of the policies will be on the February EPFD Board agenda. • Facilities Update o Mithun Building Envelop & Seismic Assessment Update Ms. Meagher reported slides from the meeting with Mithun in early January are included in the packet which include initial key findings and recommended options. Another meeting will be scheduled to review cost analysis for the alternatives proposed in the finding. Ms. Liu advised the cost analysis that Facilities & Operations requested was repairs versus replacement in the same footprint. Board President Liaw recommended a presentation also be provided to the EPFD Board once that information is available to invite the ECA Board to that presentation. Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 25, 2024 Page 5 Packet Pg. 137 7.4.d Ms. Meagher advised an insurance claim has been filed with Enduras related to a water leak in the music building roof. Facilities & Operations Member Norm Brown will provide a report regarding the condition of the music building to the Steering Committee. Board VP Willcock requested Mithun provide a presentation to EPFD Board following presentation to Facilities & Operations Committee that included time associated with renovations versus replacement, safety of occupying buildings in the interim, and anticipated deterioration in the interim. He suggested ECA Board members be invited to that EPFD Board meeting. • Finance Update o November & December Financials Ms. Meagher reported the November financial were included in the packet. Year-end reconciliation is still being done. She anticipated year end 2023 financials will be provided at next month's meeting. There is a considerable operating loss due to contributions and programming. As of the end of November, the deficit is higher deficit than budgeted and she did not anticipate that would change with the December financials. 10. Executive Director Update • Development Update o Monthly Status Update o Gala Finalization Ms. Liu reported the final number for the Gala was $420,237. Some outstanding expenses are still being analyzed to realize the net revenue, but expenses were within budget. She anticipated the net would be approximately $40,000 above budget. o Year -End Ms. Liu reported the 2023 year-end appeal totaled $26,600 from 62 donors which was lower than budgeted and lower than the 2022 year-end appeal due to timing of the Gala, some appeals went out late, the Gala poached some of year-end appeal donors, and a few gifts received earlier in 2023 were not counted as part of the year-end appeal. Several returning donors from the 2022 year-end appeal increased their donation and some lapsed donors returned due to the development team reaching out personally via email/phone. For 2024, she is assisting the development team with putting best practices in place. The team has created a development calendar for 2024, will soon launch planning for Center Stage, and are planning first quarter events including a Center Circle reception in conjunction with Michael Cavanaugh's performance on February 8, an evening with Schubert and Ethan on February 27 and a few more events throughout the spring. Overall philanthropy fell short in a few areas in 2023, specifically season sponsorships, grants and increased major giving, areas she is will be working with development team on to develop renewed strategies. • Programming/Revenue Update Ms. Liu reported Director of Programming & Communications Liz Dawson, Talent Buyer Greg Garcia, and she were at APAP last week and met with a number of agents and artists and participated in some great workshops. She is excited about what they saw and what they will potentially be able to contract for the next season. Five special engagement have been added for Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 25, 2024 Page 6 Packet Pg. 138 7.4.d the 2024/2025 season. A ticketing revenue report will be provided following this meeting; she expected to see variances between this week and next due to those five new shows going on sale. Sales are strong for February shows. Marketing will refocus on March shows when there are a few more experiential artists. She and Ms. Dawson are working on a programming philosophy for 2024/2025 to capitalize on both diversity and revenue generation. Prioritization of Items — Joint Board & Staff Leadership Retreat Ms. Liu referred to the post -retreat wish list and analysis; the staff report identified items already being worked on. Other priorities include continuing to monitor and address staff capacity; supporting the IDEA work occurring in committees, the endowment and planned giving; mapping out the strategic plan; and the Board Governance Committee's efforts related to board recruitment. • Strategic Planning Update Ms. Liu advised she is developing a timeline and elements which will be presented to various committees and then to the EPFD Board next month. She anticipated the RFP will be available by the end of the second quarter, a consultant engaged by the end of the third quarter, and the strategic planning process beginning in 2025. • Organizational Capacity Ms. Liu relayed outlines have been provided by all department heads; she and Ms. Meagher expect to finalize the information in February. Staff development enhancements are moving forward including bimonthly/quarterly Lunch & Learn with a speaker related to professional development. Board President Liaw recalled a survey done of board members' skills which could be a source for speakers. 11. New Business Administrative Services Director Dave Turley advised the EPFD is supposed to provide an annual presentation to the city council. This year will be particularly important due to the new executive director and to inform new councilmembers about the EPFD/ECA. Following a brief discussion, a presentation to council was tentatively scheduled for March 5 12. Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 9:08 a.m. Next EPFD Board Meeting: Thursday, February 22, 2024 - 7:30 AM ACTION ITEMS: 1. February EPFD Board meeting a. Yearend 2023 financials b. Prepare list of external and internal committees with assigned board members c. Review Youth Protection & Safety Policy (board members submit comments/suggestion to Ms. Meagher by February 8) d. Interlocal & Administrative Agreements between EPFD and ECA e. Review and approve Pets at the Workplace and Children at the Workplace policies (board members submit comments/suggestions to Ms. Meagher by February 8) f. Prepare timeline and elements of next Strategic Plan Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 25, 2024 Page 7 Packet Pg. 139 7.4.d 2. Provide EPFD Board ticket sales report each month (does not need to be agenda item) 3. Grant writer create spreadsheet with analysis of available grants, grants applied for and grants received. 4. Notice next Philanthropy Committee meeting as a joint meeting with the EPFD Board to discuss overall development strategy 5. Change column in Ticket Sales Report that compares ticket sales to capacity to a comparison of actual ticket sales to budgeted ticket sales 6. Research whether internal committees were created by resolution 7. Mithun provide presentation to EPFD Board following presentation to Facilities & Operations Committee. Presentation to include time associated with renovations versus replacement, safety of occupying buildings in the interim and anticipated deterioration in the interim. Invite ECA Board Members to that EPFD Board meeting. 8. Presentation to city council at their March 5 meeting Edmonds Public Facilities District Board Draft Minutes January 25, 2024 Page 8 Packet Pg. 140 7.4.e SeaShore Agenda Friday, March 1, 2024 7:30 a.m.-8:55 a.m. Zoom Link: https://kingcounty.zoom.us/u/83760016727 (No password required) 1. Open Meeting Action 7:30am • Name and affiliation in chat • Welcome from the Chair 2. Reports and Communications Report 7:35am • Participant Updates (Metro, RTC, PSRC, Sound Transit, WSDOT, and other regional committees) 3. Chair calls for: Report & Vote 7:45am • Public comment • Approve previous meeting minutes 4. PSRC Regional Project Review - King County Area Report 7:50am Peter Heffernan (King County Metro, Intergovernmental Relations) 5. Letter of Support Process Discussion 8:05am 7. Good of the Order Discussion 8:25am 8. Adjourn Action 8:30am 0 a 0 m a� w E E 0 tU CU -a M 0 m m r 3 O N O N O M O M m a as L 0 L U) M d U) r _ E t ci y.+ Q Packet Pg. 141 7.4.f Seashore Minutes 02.02.2024 The meeting was called to order at 7:34 a.m. Genevieve Jones reported that there was no RTC meeting January, but there is a new Co -Chair, King County Councilmember Teresa Mosqueda and several other jurisdictions picked new members. New members introduced themselves including Lake Forest Park Mayor Tom French. Heather Marx introduced herself as a staff member for Seattle City Councilmember Rob Saka. Councilmember Rob Loutsis from Kenmore introduced himself. The January meeting minutes were unanimously approved. Robin Koskey of the PSRC gave a state legislative update. The transportation budget is facing a shortfall due to rising costs and declining gas tax revenues. Legislators are not expected to make any major changes in this short session. There may be an effort to fund and build several needed ferries in the coming years. HB 2492 would create a new Ferry Commission to represent ferry issues. HB 2160 promotes TOD near transit. Some legislators are seeking additional clarification on BRT lines. Co -Chair Goldman asked if the BRT definition is based on federal guidelines. A —there is no Federal definition of BRT, but there is often federal funding for BRT. Not all BRT lines use Federal funding so that is an issue to be resolved. CM Paine asked about smaller cities and BRT standards. Would they be impacted. A —We don't think so, the map shown last year covered too many areas and included any bus in any HOV lane. This version of the bill has fixed that. There was also a question about FAR, which stands for Floor Area Ratio. CM Loutsis provided extra definition on FAR. Co -Chair Goldman asked about the bill banning right turns on red. A— presenter was not sure where that bill was but will try to track it down. Carmen Bendixen or Washington State Ferries presented on the 2023 Ferry Passenger Demographic Survey Report. She is a senior transportation planner for WSF. Ther report looks at the demographic makeup of riders and their usage of the system. Reaching underserved communities was a priority. The survey was in Spanish for the first time. Braille and phone survey options were offered as well. The survey was done in August and October. They did onboard outreach, used posters at facilities, used email and text alerts, and put survey invites on tickets. There were 15, 371 survey responses, mostly from the summer period. Survey users represented all routes. Most riders ride at least 1-3 times a month and 14.3% ride four times or more a week. 15% of riders were people of color. More women answered than men. Nearly a quarter of respondents were below the federal poverty level. Most respondents live in a two -person household. Many riders use ferries to visit friends or family and for tourism. The share of commuters has dropped from 54% to 23% since the pandemic. Most riders paid a single fare, but 27% used a multi -fare pass. Co -Chair Goldman asked about the mode people use to ride ferries. A —most riders use cars but about 18% walk on system ride. He also asked if they were going to analyze line by line. A —that is coming soon. Packet Pg. 142 7.4.f Genevieve Jones asked how legislators will use this survey data. A —we haven't gotten any response yet from legislators so that is unclear. Genevieve Jones reviewed last month's discussion of dues and in person meeting options and provided a recommendation for four changes to the operating agreements. Members confirmed that they wanted to meet as Seashore in person in March. Shoreline has offered to host us in March. Members did not necessarily want to collect dues. There are four suggested changes to the operating agreements: change shall collect dues to may collect dues; clarify what dues can be used for; change says shall meet in person to may meet as hybrid; requiring comments to be relevant to SeaShore to address Zoombombing. Co -Chair Goldman asked about voting. A —only cities who are voting members can vote Jim Hammond of Shoreline said that March 1 is the date of Shoreline's Council retreat and that there is not any Shoreline members here today. He suggested perhaps meeting in person in April and voting in the future. Deputy Mayor Randolph said he likes some in -person meetings and a hybrid options. CM Paine asked about what measures are being taken for Zoombombing. A —we have a waiting room so people must be admitted. Genevieve can remove or mute participants or override someone taking control of the screen. CM Randolph said most of these changes are things we are already doing so he supports voting on these changestoday. Mayor Matsumoto -Wright endorsed the changes and supports voting today. The procedural changes were adopted unanimously. March will be a Zoom meeting and the hybrid in -person meeting will be on April 5. Genevieve Jones reported under good of the order that we will always use Zoom and to ignore any Teams link. Genevieve also screen shared the membership roster and members confirmed its accuracy. Mayor Matsumoto -Wright asked for a letter of support for a RAISE grant to finish the main street in the town center. Jim Hammond of Shoreline said that he was fine with supporting a letter of support. They can run the letter by Shoreline council members. Several other members said they would support wordsmithing There was a motion to support a letter of support for a Mountlake Terrace RAISE grant pending inclusion of boiler plate language by staff and the final version being emailed to the board as a whole. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:01 a.m. Attendees• Andie Parnell, Sound Cities Association Packet Pg. 143 7.4.f Brock Howell, Snohomish County Transportation Coalition Carmen Bendixen, Washington State Ferries Chris Arkills, King County Metro Elsa Brown, City of Seattle Erik Ashlie-Vinke, Sound Transit Genevieve Jones, King County Metro Heather Marx, Office of Seattle City Councilmember Rob Saka James Randolph, Woodinville Deputy Mayor Jamyang Dorjee, Community Transit Jeffrey Perrigo, Lake Forest Park Public Works Jim Hammond, City of Shoreline Kelly McGourty, PSRC Kyoko Mastumoto-Wright, Mountlake Terrace Mayor Larry Goldman, Lake Forest Park Councilmember Matthew Kenna, WSDOT Mike Dee, Lake Forest Park Citizen's Commission Nathan Loutsis, Kenmore Councilmember Nytasha Walter, City of Shoreline Oscar Antillon, Edmonds Public Works Phillip Hill, Lake Forest Park Ryan Packer, The Urbanist Susan Paine, Edmonds Councilmember Tom French, Lake Forest Park Mayor Packet Pg. 144 7.4.g SNOHOMISH COUNTY SNOHOMISH COUNTY 911 BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD MEETING AGENDA s = March 21, 2024 at 8:30 a.m. 3FROJEJ Web Conference — Join Zoom Meeting https://uso2web.zoom.us/i/86274396181 Meeting ID: 860 00 46 6014, Passcode: 195881 or dial +1 253 215 8782 Physical location: 1121 SE Everett Mall Way, Everett Police Department, South Precinct. Please note that most Board members and staff attend the meeting remotely. However, pursuant to RCW 42.30, a physical location is also provided. 1. Call to Order A. Roll Call B. Announcements C. Public Comments: Limited to 3 minutes on items related to agency business 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Consent Agenda A. Minutes from the February 15, 2024 Regular Board Meeting B. February 2024 Blanket Voucher & Payroll Approval Form: i. Checks 1034-1039, and 18483-18600, for a total of $2,096,213.21 ii. Payroll Direct Deposit, in the amount of $1,382,797.14 C. Tower Leases — FBI Master Lease Agreement; Marysville Tank and Gunnysack Hill Site License Agreements 4. Old Business A. Vacancy in ECSFP (Emergency Communication Systems and Facilities Program) B. Board Member Caucus Structural Changes for Consideration C. Mountlake Terrace South Campus Lease D. SAO Audit 5. New Business A. Approval of 2023 Annual Report 6. Reports A. Agency Report i. April Meeting: In -person at South County Fire HQ ii. Board Membership Caucuses Packet Pg. 145 7.4.g iii. Radio Interference Hunting B. New Facility Project Update i. GMP Review & Approval C. Radio Replacement Project (RRP) D. Police TAC (No meeting in March) E. Fire TAC 7. Committee Reports A. Finance Committee B. Personnel Committee C. Future Facility Committee (No meeting) D. County EESCS Committee (formerly County E911 Office) E. County ECSF Program Advisory Board 8. Good of the Order 9. Adjourn - The next meeting is scheduled for April 18, 2024 at 8:30 a.m., and will meet at South County Fire - Commissioner's meeting room. Packet Pg. 146 8.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Approval of Committee Meeting Minutes March 12, 2024 Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Approval of Council Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda. Narrative Council meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: 2024-03-12 Council PPW Minutes 2024-03-12 Council PSPHSP Minutes 2024-03-12 Council FIN Minutes Packet Pg. 147 8.1.a PARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE SPECIAL MEETING March 12, 2024 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Susan Paine (Chair) Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director Councilmember Michelle Dotsch Rob English, City Engineer Council President Olson (ex-officio) Shannon Burley, Deputy Parks, Rec. & Human Serv. Dir. Councilmember Jenna Nand Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Mgr. Bertrand Hauss, Transportation Engineer Nicholas Falk, Deputy Clerk CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council PPW Committee special meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 — 51h Avenue North, Edmonds, at 1:30 pm by Councilmember Paine. 2. RECEIVED FOR FILING 1. Public Works Update 4th Quarter 2023 3. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Summer Market, Edmonds SpringFest, Edmonds Arts Festival, 4th of July and Taste Edmonds Special Event Agreements Ms. Burley explained because these large special events impact street right-of-way and/or residents in the area, the contracts require council authorization. Each contract has been reviewed by the city attorney as well as staff from each department. Summer Market - Saturdays, May 4 - October 19 (excluding August 10, Taste of Edmonds weekend) Expanding slightly with 3-4 additional booths on Bell Street which will allow the City to have a booth one Saturday/month to gather public feedback. Contract is nearly identical to previous years. SpringFest — May 11 Held annually the Saturday before Mother's Day. Organizers were given the option of Frances Anderson Center (FAC) and Civic Park and they chose to stay at FAC. Event is free and open to the public and no alcohol is served. West side of 8th Avenue will be closed between Main and Dayton for food trucks, east side remains open to provide local access. Edmonds Arts Festival — June 14 - 16 Held annually on Father's Day weekend. Utilizes the entire FAC, Plaza Room and Plaza. Rental fee is higher than other events due to utilization of space. Free and open to the public with minimal alcohol (Rotary runs a small beer/wine garden). Has become a significant economic and tourist event. 4th of July Parade and 5/1 K — July 4 Chamber puts on this event. Includes a 5K and 1 K run in cooperation with the Town of Woodway, parade and children's parade. Taste Edmonds — August 9 - 11 Moving back to Civic Park (temporary relocated to FAC while Civic under construction). Civic Park was designed to hold large festivals; amount of available potable water and festival power in the park is significant. Event will utilize nearly the entire park. Chamber working on planning related to traffic flow in the park, what's allowed where, etc. Do not plan to close any streets, Parking on 6th & 7th will be Packet Pg. 148 8.1.a 03/12/24 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2 restricted for ADA and artist parking. Parks will service the permanent restroom throughout the event and there will also be temporary restrooms. Ms. Burley relayed staff's recommendation for approval of the contracts on the consent agenda which will authorize the mayor to sign the agreements. Questions and discussion followed regarding master planning that envisioned significant festivals at Civic, uncertainty in March 2023 if Civic would be completed in time for Taste, RCO approval to have temporary events at Civic that charge admission, topics covered in the event agreement, admission fee determined by promoter, the Chamber's funding of police for Taste, and the mayor's decision whether the Chamber pays for police related to the 4th of July parade. Committee recommendation: Consent Agenda 2. Design Update on the Highway 99 Revitalization Projects - Stage 3 and Stage 4 Mr. Hauss introduced Scott Sawyer, SCJ Alliance, and reviewed: • Scope of Improvements o Previous Projects • Stage 1 - Corridor Planning • Stage 2 - Center Medians - HAWK signal - Gateway signs on both ends ■ Current Projects - Stage 3: 244th to -238th - Stage 4: 224th to -220th ■ Scope of work - Sidewalks - added buffer - Separated bike lanes - Landscape buffers - Stormwater treatment Packet Pg. 149 8.1.a 03/12/24 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3 - Street / pedestrian light poles - Capacity Improvements at signalized intersections (238th and 220th) - SR-104 Interchange Active Transportation Safety Improvements - Art opportunities - Distinct districts - Possible conversion to underground utilities Notable Changes since start design phase o Items approved by Council at March 2023 Meeting • WSDOT Complete Streets Implementation - Added separated bike lanes along entire corridor ■ Improvements along 238th and 220th - Added bike lanes along 238t" from Hwy 99 to 84th - Added active transportation path along 220th from Highway 99 to Interurban Trail / 70th Ave W (City of Mountlake Terrace) Mr. Sawyer reviewed: • Notable Environmental Stormwater Changes o Stormwater Treatment - Salmon and 6PPD-quinone ■ 2020: 6PPD-quinone identified as toxic to adult salmon, especially for coho - Dust from vehicle tires contains 6PPD-q - Stormwater runoff carries tire dust from roadways ■ 2022: USFW and NMFS requires formal consultation for the ESA (salmon), unless stormwater is 100% infiltrated - Previously, ESA for stormwater was usually informal and programmatic - Now, formal ESA consultations add -2 years to the timeline for NEPA ■ 2024: WSDOT is working with NMFS on new programmatic guidance - New programmatic agreements may help reduce schedule impacts - New stormwater manuals through Ecology potentially out in 2024 - Litigation likely between advocacy groups and US EPA Mr. Sawyer responded to questions regarding stormwater standards, treating stormwater using standards in the 2024 stormwater manual, what happens if new standards related to 6PPD-q are enacted before the City receives NEPA approval, and time and cost to implement new technology. Mr. Hauss reviewed: Highway 99 Corridor Districts o Gateway District ■ 244th to 228th o International District ■ 228th to 220th o Health District ■ 220th to 210th • Preliminary Schedule o Risks and Focus Areas Health District a4vq International ~ District -�j lbt�•j a r_Gateway District 21 Packet Pg. 150 8.1.a 03/12/24 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 4 Endangered Species Act permitting - salmon 6ppdq Right of way acquisition Construction funding Milestones and Schedule Preliminary Design Final Design Environmental WE ARE HERE Right of Way Public Involvement Construction ® Preliminary Design Final Design Environmental Right of aW y Construction r Public Involvement Right -of -Way o Facts and Figures ■ Existing width -100 feet ■ Proposed width -105 feet to 112 feet ■ Number of parcels - Stage 3: 18 parcels - Stage 4: 28 parcels o Preliminary Cost Estimate (planning level in 2022) ■ Stage 3: $2.4 million ■ Stage 4: $5.6 million 0 30% Design Level Preliminary Cost Estimate ■ Stage 3: $4.0 million ■ Stage 4: $9.0 million o Reasons for increase ■ Added width for Complete Streets (-1 foot to 9 feet) ■ Extended improvements along 238th and 220th ■ Added acquisition locations for art opportunities ■ Inflation and value appreciation Overhead Utilities o Aerial to underground conversion costs ■ Fully paid by certain utility companies (Comcast & Wave) ■ Paid by the City for other utility companies (PUD & Ziply) - With aerial to aerial cost credited to the City ■ In franchise negotiations with PUD, plan to increase contribution for aerial to underground conversion Overhead Utility Conversions o Preliminary Cost Summary ■ Stage 3 - Aerial to Aerial-$800,000 - Aerial to Underground (net City cost) $5.8 million ■ Stage 4 - Aerial to Aerial $1.8 million - Aerial to Underground (net City cost) $8.4 million Mr. English reviewed: • Stage 3 o Preliminary Cost Estimate $26.5 million ■ Design Phase $3.85 million ■ Right of Way Phase $4 million ■ Construction Phase $18.55 million Packet Pg. 151 8.1.a 03/12/24 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 5 (includes utility undergrounding at $5.8M) o Funding • Design & right-of-way phases - Connecting Washington $5.2 million - Move Ahead *** $2.7 million • Construction Phase - Move Ahead *** $18.6 million ***pending request to move forward Move Ahead WA Funds Stage 4 o Preliminary Cost Estimate $35.7 million ■ Design $4.5 million ■ Right of Way $9.1 million • Construction $22.1 million (includes utility undergrounding at $8.4M) o Funding Sources (Design & ROW Phases) ■ Connecting Washington $1.6 million ■ Federal Grants $4.2 million ■ Move Ahead *** $1.3 million ■ Local Funds (local match) - Traffic Impact Fees $3 million - REET $1.3 million ***pending request to move forward Move Ahead WA Funds • Shortfall - ROW Phase $2.2 million - Construction Phase $22.1 million Next Steps o Decision to underground overhead utility lines o Pending legislative request to program Move Ahead WA funds earlier than 2031 ■ $4.3 million included in the supplemental budget for the 2025-2027 biennium and $18+ million in the 2027-2029 biennium, pending approval by the governor. o Amend SCJ Agreement to continue design work ■ New environmental / stormwater requirements ■ Design work for 238th St and 220th St extensions ■ Work on ILA with WSDOT regarding future Highway 99 overlay ■ Public outreach Questions and discussion followed regarding improvements on 84t" and 238t", utility undergrounding in Shoreline, funding sources for utility undergrounding, when the PUD franchise agreement update will be completed, support for removing 6PPD-quinone, timeline for spending RAISE grant funds, Complete Streets redesign, designing features between the BAT lane and sidewalk to prevent pedestrian collisions, considering an easement for art versus ROW acquisition, batching ROW acquisitions to council rather than individually, including businesses in public outreach, and providing council a map of ROW acquisitions. Committee recommendation: Presentation to full council March 19 3. Presentation of 2024 Update of Development Related Fees Ms. McConnell explained typically the City updates development related fees every three years. The engineering division recently recognized some fees do not cover the cost of staff time due to inflation, increased complexity, etc. and adjustments need be made to the fees. She reviewed the proposed fee increases. a) Increase hourly review and inspection fees for all reviewing departments/divisions based on CPI. General review and inspections fees will increase from $126/hour to $132/hour Packet Pg. 152 8.1.a 03/12/24 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 6 b) Increase flat fees for engineering permits and reviews based on CPI c) Add Fill/Grade Permit type for large multi -family & commercial projects with hourly review fees d) Add Meter Drop -In Only Fee e) Clarify applicability of Development Project Peer Review (outside consultant) fees f) Add an in-house arborist review fee g) Update Subdivision review fees to include an hourly fee for technical staff review Questions and discussion followed regarding itemized billing for telecom, support for updating fees, time increments for billing fees, and ability to bill the cost of consultants. Committee recommendation: Consent Agenda 4. Presentation of Professional Services Agreement for Design Engineering Services with DEA for Phase 12 & 13 Sewerline Realacement and Rehabilitation Proiects Mr. English explained this is part of the annual replacement program. The City issued an RFP in November 2023 for a consultant to design Phases 12 and 13. Five engineering firms responded; via a selection process, David Evans & Associated was selected as the most qualified. This agreement is for the preliminary assessment and 30% design work on the entire 9,000 feet of replacement/rehabilitation work. The 9,000 feet will be divided approximately in half for Phases 12, built in 2025, and Phase 13, built in 2026. The $237,000 fee includes a management reserve of approximately $21,000. Once the 30% design is complete for Phase 12, staff will return to council to request a supplement to do final design for Phase 12 and 6-9 months later request a supplement for final design of Phase 13. This is funded by the sewer utility fund. Questions and discussion followed regarding replacement/rehabilitation projects citywide, CIPP sites versus new pipe, coordinating utility replacement with utility undergrounding, pipe diameter for CIPP, use of CIPP for stormwater pipes, and tree root intrusion. Committee recommendation: Consent Agenda 5. Amendment for On -Call Stormwater Review Services Mr. English recalled last year the council approved an on -call consultant for stormwater review services for private development permit applications to free up the stormwater engineer to work on the stormwater and surface water comprehensive plan update. This amendment is to provide on -call stormwater review until the stormwater position is filled following Jerry Shuster's retirement. The work done by the consultant is fully recoverable via fees. The amendment is $120,000 is based on estimated usage; actual amount will depend on permit activity. The stormwater engineer is a difficult position to fill as it requires specific qualifications and experience and recruiting in the civil engineer field is difficult in the region due to the amount of work. Questions and discussion followed regarding the consultant working on the comprehensive plan update Committee recommendation: Consent Agenda 6. Planning Study for Edmonds Marsh and Estuary Restoration Mr. Antillon explained in partnership with a citizen volunteer group, the City applied for a National Fish and Wildlife Foundation grant to support the planning process for the eventual restoration of the Edmonds Marsh. The scope of the work includes completing a gap analysis of the existing data, listing restoration alternatives, potential impact of exposing contaminated soil to surface water, listing permits and approvals required for restoration, evaluating project land purchase and restoration funding options, Packet Pg. 153 8.1.a 03/12/24 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 7 identifying a process that defines community goals for the marsh and producing a scoping document that lists the tasks required to complete the restoration plan. This is a multiyear process that will assist with applying for future grants if the City purchases the property. He proposed the marsh restoration and preservation fund, Fund 017, provide required matching funds. Questions and discussion followed regarding amount available in the marsh fund, expenditure from the marsh fund for the match, what the consultant can do awaiting DOE's final determination on cleanup, whether an RFQ will be done, work done by volunteers, who will do analysis, community input into the analysis, community members assisting with the grant, volunteer management, study timeline, site analysis includes the dog park, process for authorizing the grant, budget amendment for matching funds, and required approvals. Committee recommendation: Full council 7. Parks and Public Works Committee Meeting Proposed Time Change Councilmember Paine proposed changing the start time of the PPW committee from 7:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. to use staff and councilmember's time appropriately and so rescheduled meeting are not special meetings. Both she and Councilmember Dotsch are available 1:30-3:30 pm on committee meeting day and staff feedback on the time change has been favorable. Discussion followed regarding what happens if a meeting takes longer than 2 hours. Committee recommendation: Consent Agenda 3. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 3:12 pm. Packet Pg. 154 8.1.b PUBLIC SAFETY, PLANNING, HUMAN SERVICES & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING March 12, 2024 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Neil Tibbott (Chair) Shane Hawley, Police Commander Councilmember Chris Eck Rob English, City Engineer Council President Vivian Olson(ex-officio) Emily Wagener, Human Resources Analyst Councilmember Jenna Nand Nicholas Falk, Deputy Clerk CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council PSPHSP Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 — 5t" Avenue North, Edmonds, at 3:31 pm by Councilmember Tibbott. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Approval of Public Works Records Administrator Job Description Mr. English explained this position was approved in the 2024 budget (DP #19), and is funded by the Utility funds. The position was identified due to the ongoing need to organize, track and retain documents in Public Works. Some existing documents have been migrated to electronic and incorporated into the GIS system, but a great deal more needs to be done. It is critical to have accurate information related to as-builts, easements, etc. Questions and discussion followed regarding who has done this work in the past, and divisions the position will provide services to. Committee recommendation: Consent Agenda 2. Amending ECC 5.34 - Adding a New Section (ECC 5.35.010) to City Code for "Computer Crimes" and Adopting Several Parts of RCW 9A.90 Commander Hawley explained this ECC amendment creates a new city code section (ECC 5.35.010) for misdemeanor computer crimes. During an ECC amendment last month, cyberstalking was removed from the city code, and replaced with cyber harassment. This amendment adopts by reference RCWs related to definitions, computer trespass in the second degree, spoofing, electronic data tampering in the second degree, commission of other crime, and cyber harassment. Questions and discussion followed regarding computer crime based on the location of the victim, and the federal government intervening with major crimes. Committee recommendation: Consent Agenda 3. Amending ECC 5.04.010 - Removing RCW 66.44.291 and RCW 66.44.320 Commander Hawley explained this amendment removes two RCWs from ECC 5.04.010 related to minors and alcohol that no longer exist and are covered in other RCWs. Committee recommendation: Consent Agenda 4. Amending ECC 5.12.020-Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor Packet Pg. 155 8.1.b 3/12/24 PSPHSP Committee Minutes, Page 2 Commander Hawley explained this is related to adults committing crimes where a minor might be a willing party, but due to their age, are not able to consent or are unable to possess something. The amendment adopts RCWs by reference related to selling or giving tobacco to a minor and applying a tattoo to a minor. The amendment also removes several RCWs that have been removed or merged with other RCWs. Committee recommendation: Consent Agenda 5. Council Rules of Procedure Sections 3 & 8 Councilmember Tibbott explained the council approved allowing public comment after the staff presentation on an agenda topic; this amendment to the council rules of procedure will implement it. Questions and discussion followed regarding the amount of time an organization is allowed to speak, providing opportunity for organizations to make a presentation to council, concern with restrictions in Section 8.4 related to allowing only one five-minute presentation/year, rewording Section 8.4, a suggestion to limit comments during an agenda item to in -person, equity concerns with limiting comments during an agenda item to in -person, technology issues with allowing virtual comments during an agenda item, providing a disclaimer that virtual comments are allowed only during audience comments, whether to allow public comment following staff's presentation during an agenda item, and members of the public communicating with councilmembers during a meeting. Committee recommendation: Section 3 on Consent Agenda, bring Section 8 back to next PSPHSP meeting. 3. ADJOURN The meeting was adjourned at 4:09 pm. Packet Pg. 156 8.1.c FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING March 12, 2024 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Will Chen (Chair) Dave Turley, Administrative Services Director Councilmember Jenna Nand Kim Dunscombe, Deputy Admin. Serv. Director Council President Vivian Olson (ex-officio) Nicholas Falk, Deputy Clerk Councilmember Michelle Dotsch Councilmember Susan Paine CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council Finance Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 — 5` Avenue North, Edmonds, at 5:31 pm by Councilmember Chen. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) Policy Ms. Dunscombe explained the State Auditor's Office (SAO) recommends the City implement a written policy in accordance with RCW 39.58.750 for all electronic funds. She highlighted elements required by the RCW: 1. Implementation of bank -offered security measures to prevent unauthorized individuals from initiating or modifying a transfer. Each user initiating or approving bank transactions must have a separate banking user ID. Addressed in Section 6.0 Internal Controls 2. Define the process for creating, securing, sending, and authenticating direct deposit transmittal files to prevent unauthorized modification or submission. Addressed in Section 6.0 Internal Controls — Transfer Verification and Approval and Segregation of Duties 3. Policies and procedures should be in place to validate these authorizations to protect resources being transferred electronically. Ms. Dunscombe highlighted additional revisions as a result of discussion with Councilmember Chen today: • First bullet under 5.0 Electronic Funds Transfer — add Accountant and Director as positions authorized to make transfers • Third bullet under 5.0 Electronic Funds Transfer — Revise to read, " GGO Rts Payable One-time EFT: Once -time vender EFTs are..." Questions and discussion followed regarding support for the changes to strengthening internal controls, fraud the state experienced, how long the City has been doing EFTs, bank practices related to EFTs, limited EFTs, Munis' ability to do EFTs, dollar amounts that are considered high and low, director preapproved templates, reasons not to include a dollar amount in policy, whether the policy should specifically disallow tools that banks offer such as distributed ledger technology, having the finance chair or council president sample EFTs annually before the audit, concern it is not the council's role to audit Finance, and the council's ability to authorize and fund an independent audit. Committee recommendation: Policy with amendments on agenda at next Finance Committee meeting 2. Fund Balance/Reserve Policy Amendment Discussion Councilmember Chen explained a Fiscal Policy Work Group was formed consisting of himself and Councilmember Nand and community members Dave Teitzel, Diane Buckshnis, Darrol Haug and Thatcher Boddendeitchel to suggest revisions to strengthen the existing reserve policy that was established in 2019. Packet Pg. 157 8.1.c 03/12/24 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 2 Councilmember Chen shared proposed revisions to the policy and committee members and staff provided input: Goals The goals of this Fund Reserve Policy is to provide clear guidance for the appropriate level of Fund Balance Reserve for our city, set reporting and monitoring requirements, define the appropriate triggering warning mechanism, set Council approval before any Restricted Reserve can be used, define replenishment timeline and requirements, obtain consensus between Council and Administration that our city's finances should be managed responsibly, and that uncommitted fund balances should not be spent down to the ceiling of the General Fund reserve level, and earn a consistent AAA bond rating from the bond rating agencies. Discussion followed regarding concern with the language, "...obtain consensus between council and admin that our city's finances should be managed responsibly," intent of that language to be an aspirational statement not criticism, a suggestion to revise the last sentence in the "Policy" paragraph to read, "In addition, this policy incorporates provisions of Government Accounting Standards Board Statement (GASB) no. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Government Fund Type Definitions for financial reporting on an annual basis." ARTICLE III COMNUTTED GENERAL FUND BALANCE RESERVES POLICY This Policy shall establish a committed fund balance reserve , define funding levels and call the reserve the General Fund Operating Reserve. The purpose of the reserve is for meeting economic uncertainties, and unanticipated expenses or revenue shortfalls. This Policy requires the City to establish and maintain a General Fund Operating Reserve, , in an amount equal to or greater than 16% of the General Fund's Adopted Annual Operating Expenditure Budget. If it is determined that the reserve balances are not adequate, the Mayor shall propose an amendment to these policies. The General Fund Operating Reserve Fund shall be a separate fund outside of the General Fund. This is to achieve its visibility, much like the Contingency Reserve Fund. Fund number 011 shall be the designated fund number for The General Fund Operating Reserve. Discussion followed regarding the intent of removing "within the General Fund" is to establish a separate fund for 16% portion of reserve so it is easier for the administration to manage, whether establishing a separate reserve funds is legal and concern it would not be easier for administration, whether the operating reserve is within the General Fund in other cities, need to choose a different fund number as 011 is an existing fund, segregating funds within General Fund to achieve goals of the new paragraph without creating a separate fund, goal of the work group to create segregation between the reserve and the rest of the General Fund, concern the council was unaware when the reserve was used in the past, the goal to provide notification when the operating reserve is being utilized, and timeline in which the mayor is legally obligated to notify the council that the operating reserve is being utilized. A detailed accounting of this reserve account will be maintained by the Finance Department to show deposits, withdrawals (when authorized pursuant to policies contained herein) and interest earned. All accounting for these accounts shall be recorded in the City's ERP system theugM we have sinee implemented a e .. . I A detailed report, prepared by the Finance Department, shall be presented annually to the Council. In addition, a monthly report by the Finance Department shall be presented to Council showing a projection of end of year general fund balance. If in any two consecutive months, this report indicates the City's end of year fund balance will be less than 2521% of budgeted operating expenditures, the Mayor shall implement measures to ensure the end of year general fund balance does not drop below 2016% of adopted budgeted operating expenditures unless Council explicitly approves use of general fund committed reserves. Note: A 5% of the budgeted general fund operating expenditures is built in as the warning mechanism. During the time when the restricted reserve is already below the required 16%, the 5% warning mechanism is waived. The Mayor and the administration shall focus on rebuilding the reserve back to its required 16% level. Packet Pg. 158 8.1.c 03/12/24 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 3 There was no input on the above revisions. The Mayor has the power to declare a fiscal emergency based upon one of the tollowing: 1) A natural catastrophe_; 2) An immediate threat to health and public safety; or ILA significant decline in General Fund revenues. Or 3) 4) Unexpected expenditures that outpaced General Fund revenue. The fiscal emergency declared by the Mayor must be approved by a simple majority of the City Council._ Discussion followed regarding a comparator city that uses "market forces" instead of unexpected expenditures. Tr-ANsWOR p9hey Getineil adeptien of this pekey will tfigge net less than 16,04 of the General Fund's There was no input on the above revisions. ARTICLE IV CONTINGENT RESERVE FUND BALANCE POLICY This Policy shall establish a fund and define funding levels for a committed Fund Balance Reserve to be called the Contingent Reserve Fund The primary purpose of the reserve is for meeting emergencies of the City and, secondarily, if the General Fund Operating Reserve have been exhausted, the Contingent Reserve Fund can be use in times of economic uncertainties, and for unanticipated expenses or revenue shortfalls. The target balance of the Reserve shall I) not exceed the limitations set forth by RCW 35A.33.145, which sets the statutory maximum at $0.375 per $1,000 of assessed valuation and 2) not pwr-,Ppd o Budget. In other- weEds, if the Genterall. Fund Opera&Wg Resmwe balanee equals 0 9,a of operating - budget then the Contingent Reserve Fund balance cannel exceed shall be 4% of the General Fund expenditures operating budget. The actual dollar amount shall be determined based on the annual adopted General Fund expenditures. It further requires a simple majority vote of Council with a statement declaring the reason for their use. Discussion followed regarding a suggestion to revise "General Fund expenditures" to "General Fund operating expenditures." A detailed accounting of the Fund shall be maintained by the Finance Department to show deposits, withdrawals (when authorized pursuant to policies contained herein) and be presented semi -annually - in February and August to the Council. The Mayor has the power to declare a fiscal emergency based upon one of the following: 1) A natural catastrophe; 2) An immediate threat to health and public safety; or 2LA significant economic decline in General Fund revenues. 3)4) Unexpected expenditures that outpaced General Fund revenue. The fiscal emergency declared by the Mayor must be approved by a simple majority of the City Council. - Note: if the mayor is unable to act or refuses to act to declare a fiscal emergencv when any one of these three conditions are present, City Council may declare a fiscal emergency by a simple maiority vote. Discussion followed regarding requiring council approval when the mayor is aware the 16% reserve or the 4% contingency reserve is being utilized, changing "unexpected expenditures" to "market forces," when council is required to declare a fiscal emergency, whether the mayor has the ability to shut down spending, and the Limitations of Fund Use section of the policy related to use of contingency reserves. Packet Pg. 159 8.1.c 03/12/24 Finance Committee Minutes, Page 4 ARTICLE V ANNUAL FUND BALANCE TYPES -STATUS REPORT Once a year, in August, the Mayor shall present to the Council Finance Committee a comprehensive report on the City's fund balance reserve types as of June 30th. The report shall include an updated fund balance reserve level for each fund balance type. This report shall include the following funds: 1. General Fund Operating Reserve balance; 2. Contingency Reserve Fund balance. Discussion followed regarding whether annual or mid -year review is appropriate, intent of the Fiscal Policy Work Group and the Mayor's Blue Ribbon Panel, and requirement for budget adjustments with a biennial budget. ARTICLE VI FINqg VEkRANNUAL RESERVE RATE REVIEW Every five yeaFsOnce a year, during the annual budget hearings, the Mayor, based upon a comprehensive financial and economic review of all City fund balance types and in consultation with the City Finance Director, and Department Directors as necessary, shall make recommendations to the City Council for either maintaining existing fund balance reserve polices or revising fund balance reserve policies including percentage ranges established by category herein and replenishment requirements by categories established herein. Discussion followed regarding a suggestion to do a review every 2 years, difficulty replenishing reserves, possibly reducing the 16% reserve level, long term financial planning, not changing the reserve level while reserves are being replenished, GFOA policies related to determining the right reserve level, and whether reserves are a factor in the City's credit rating. Committee recommendation: Work group continue refining the policy 3. January Monthly Report Mr. Turley highlighted • REET revenue is up $7,650 compared to last year, but below budget • Sales tax is up $95,000 compared to last year o Increasing but just keeping pace with inflation • Development services revenue is up $59,000 compared to last year • Total interest earning is up $102,790 compared to last year Questions and discussion followed regarding whether to revise revenue projections to address fluctuations in REET, IT fund expenditures higher than last year due to significant software price increases, shoutout to Senior Accountant Marrisa Cain and Ms. Dunscombe for improvements in the monthly report, the 2024 Genal Fund (001) Cash Flow Forecast (packet page 140), suggested changes to the Cash Flow Forecast, council approval required for use of contingency reserve, Mr. Taraday's opinion regarding annual review of the fund balance reserve policy, appreciation to Finance for developing the Cash Flow Forecast, the Cash Flow Forecast assisting council with prioritization, limitations on the use of contingency reserve funds in the existing policy, whether the City is currently spending contingency reserve funds, how long the declaration of a fiscal emergency lasts, and whether declaration of a fiscal emergency covers use of contingency funds. Committee recommendation: Received for Filing 3. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 7:13 pm. Packet Pg. 160 8.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Approval of Special Meeting Minutes March 12, 2024 Staff Lead: Council Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History N/A Recommendation Approval of Council Meeting minutes as part of the Consent Agenda. Narrative Council meeting minutes are attached. Attachments: 2024-03-12 Council Special Minutes Packet Pg. 161 8.2.a EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES DRAFT MINUTES March 12, 2024 ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Mike Rosen, Mayor Vivian Olson, Council President Neil Tibbott, Councilmember Will Chen, Councilmember Michelle Dotsch, Councilmember Susan Paine, Councilmember Chris Eck, Councilmember Jenna Nand, Councilmember 1. CALL TO ORDER STAFF PRESENT Sharon Cates, City Attorney Nickolas Falk, Deputy City Clerk Jessica Neil-Hoyson, Human Resources Director The special Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 — 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, at 5:00 p.m. by Mayor Rosen. 2. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRATEGY, RCW 42.30.140(4)(A), The Council then convened in closed session to discuss collective bargaining strategy per RCW 42.30.140(4)(a). The executive session concluded at 5:15 p.m. 3. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION The meeting reconvened at 5:15 p.m. 4. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 5:15 p.m. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes March 12, 2024 Page 1 Packet Pg. 162 8.3 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Approval of claim checks and wire payment. Staff Lead: Dave Turley Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Nori Jacobson Background/History Approval of claim checks #261796 through #261864 dated March 14, 2024 for $1,434,976.60 and wire payment of $12,973.70. Staff Recommendation Approval of claim checks and wire payment. Narrative The Council President shall be designated as the auditing committee for the city council. The council president shall review the documentation supporting claims paid and review for approval by the city council at its next regular public meeting all checks or warrants issued in payment of any claim, demand or voucher. A list of each claim, demand or voucher approved and each check or warrant issued indicating the check or warrant number, the amount paid and the vendor or payee shall be filed in the city council office for review by individual councilmembers prior to each regularly scheduled public meeting. Attachments: Claims 03-14-24 Agenda copy Packet Pg. 163 8.3.a apPosPay Positive Pay Listing Page: 1 3/14/2024 10:57:19AM City of Edmonds Document group: jacobson Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount 078745 A-1 LANDSCAPING & CONSTRUCTION 261796 3/14/2024 5,194.10 061029 ABSOLUTE GRAPHIX 261797 3/14/2024 269.84 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 261798 3/14/2024 134,468.80 079530 ALLIANCE ONE INC 261799 3/14/2024 532.72 001528 AM TEST INC 261800 3/14/2024 220.00 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 261801 3/14/2024 385.70 064341 AT&T MOBILITY 261802 3/14/2024 1,749.15 001801 AUTOMATIC WILBERT VAULT CO 261803 3/14/2024 1,006.00 063408 BARTELS & STOUT INC 261804 3/14/2024 193.00 075217 BASLER, ANTHONY C 261805 3/14/2024 165.00 078083 BUYCE JR, RICHARD J 261806 3/14/2024 510.00 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 261807 3/14/2024 298.41 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY 261808 3/14/2024 86.21 073249 CG ENGINEERING, PLLC 261809 3/14/2024 2,422.50 077727 CHINN, MARNIE 261810 3/14/2024 59.20 074537 CITY OF BELLEVUE 261811 3/14/2024 8,325.04 069457 CITY OF EDMONDS 261812 3/14/2024 890.00 073135 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 261813 3/14/2024 661.59 070323 COMCAST BUSINESS 261814 3/14/2024 212.31 076107 COMPASS HEALTH 261815 3/14/2024 9,530.18 072786 CTS LANGUAGE LINK 261816 3/14/2024 24.01 006626 DEPT OF ECOLOGY 261817 3/14/2024 46,981.00 064531 DINES, JEANNIE 261818 3/14/2024 480.00 075153 DOPPS, MARIA 261819 3/14/2024 130.00 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 261820 3/14/2024 52.91 076610 EDMONDS HERO HARDWARE 261821 3/14/2024 60.47 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 261822 3/14/2024 440.34 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD 261823 3/14/2024 247.68 079488 GRADER, SHARON M 261824 3/14/2024 1,000.00 076333 HASA INC 261825 3/14/2024 8,802.16 066575 HERC RENTALS INC 261826 3/14/2024 1,327.41 072647 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL 261827 3/14/2024 1,176.76 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 261828 3/14/2024 2,097.16 061013 HONEY BUCKET 261829 3/14/2024 701.90 079489 HUANG, AI-CHUN 261830 3/14/2024 1,000.00 079524 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES INC 261831 3/14/2024 52,100.32 074135 LAFAVE, CAROLYN 261832 3/14/2024 32.16 078470 LEVESON, NANCYANN 261833 3/14/2024 260.00 074848 LONG BAY ENTERPRISES INC 261834 3/14/2024 42.50 079529 MOLDOVAN DO AMARAL, CRISTINA 261835 3/14/2024 130.00 075542 NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 261836 3/14/2024 619.35 026200 OLYMPIC VIEW WATER DISTRICT 261837 3/14/2024 391.12 063750 ORCA PACIFIC INC 261838 3/14/2024 779.73 075735 PACIFIC SECURITY 261839 3/14/2024 4,402.95 072507 PEACE OF MIND OFFICE SUPPORT 261840 3/14/2024 264.00 073231 POLYDYNE INC 261841 3/14/2024 37,004.24 076342 PONTEM SOFTWARE BY RIA 261842 3/14/2024 2,730.00 079020 PRECISION LANGUAGE SERVICES 261843 3/14/2024 260.00 078925 PREMIER MEDIA GROUP INC 261844 3/14/2024 995.00 066786 RELIABLE SECURITY SOUND & DATA 261845 3/14/2024 657.95 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 261846 3/14/2024 1,838.08 068657 ROBERT HALF 261847 3/14/2024 1,617.00 075742 ROSE, LAURIE 261848 3/14/2024 175.85 Page: 1 Packet Pg. 164 apPosPay Positive Pay Listing 3/14/2024 10:57:19AM City of Edmonds Document group: jacobson Vendor Code & Name Check # Check Date Amount 076328 SCJ ALLIANCE 261849 3/14/2024 998,386.42 074997 SEITEL SYSTEMS, LLC 261850 3/14/2024 486.20 070495 SEPULVEDA, PABLO 261851 3/14/2024 130.00 075543 SNO CO PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC 261852 3/14/2024 38,737.00 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 261853 3/14/2024 21,314.49 038300 SOUND DISPOSAL CO 261854 3/14/2024 1,490.68 078874 STRAIGHT, COURTNEY LEA 261855 3/14/2024 90.00 027269 THE PART WORKS INC 261856 3/14/2024 3,702.49 066056 THE SEATTLE TIMES 261857 3/14/2024 1,000.00 070774 ULINE INC 261858 3/14/2024 1,788.87 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 261859 3/14/2024 27.48 067086 WASHINGTON CRANE AND HOIST CO 261860 3/14/2024 23,556.46 064800 WEHOP 261861 3/14/2024 951.92 079511 WILLIAMS, CAROL R 261862 3/14/2024 5,000.00 071634 ZAYO GROUP LLC 261863 3/14/2024 1,858.10 011900 ZIPLY FIBER 261864 3/14/2024 454.69 G randTota I: 1,434,976.60 Total count: 69 w: c a� E M a m �3 c c� Y m t E M U 4- 0 �a 0 L Q Q Q Q 0 ii Q N A O 0 E U c E t t� ca r w Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 165 8.4 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Staff Lead: Kimberly Dunscombe Department: Administrative Services Preparer: Lori Palmer Background/History Approval of payroll checks #65982 through #65983 dated March 8, 2024 for $2,931.80, payroll check #65984 dated March 20, 2024 for $1,338.32, direct deposit for $834,153.88, benefit checks #65985 through #65991 and wire payments for $830,385.87 for the pay period of March 1, 2024 to March 15, 2024. Staff Recommendation Approval of payroll and benefit checks, direct deposit and wire payments. Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non -approval of payments. Attachments: payroll earnings summary 03-15-2024 payroll earnings summary 03-07-2024 benefit checks summary report 03-15-2024 Packet Pg. 166 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,143 (03/01/2024 to 03/15/2024) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount 112 ABSENT NO PAY NON HIRED 80.00 0.00 118 ABSENT UNPAID L & 1 88.00 0.00 121 SICK SICK LEAVE 773.00 40,471.74 122 VACATION VACATION 644.75 33,432.01 123 HOLIDAY HOLIDAY HOURS 139.50 6,571.30 124 HOLIDAY FLOATER HOLIDAY 87.00 4,046.22 125 COMP HOURS COMPENSATORY TIME 160.00 8,065.82 128 HOLIDAY Holiday Bank WWTP 9.00 463.65 131 MILITARY MILITARY LEAVE 36.00 1,870.32 150 REGULAR HOURS Kelly Day Used 188.00 10,025.38 155 COMP HOURS COMPTIME AUTO PAY 78.76 4,610.73 160 VACATION MANAGEMENT LEAVE 90.00 7,973.82 190 REGULAR HOURS REGULAR HOURS 19,314.50 1,019,008.95 194 SICK Emergency Sick Leave 15.50 814.99 210 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -STRAIGHT 13.50 709.21 215 OVERTIME HOURS WATER WATCH STANDBY 48.00 3,301.40 216 MISCELLANEOUS STANDBY TREATMENT PLANT 4.00 493.66 220 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME 1.5 328.25 27,498.78 225 OVERTIME HOURS OVERTIME -DOUBLE 37.00 3,704.44 400 MISCELLANEOUS MISC PAY 0.00 3,000.00 410 MISCELLANEOUS WORKING OUT OF CLASS 0.00 1,115.74 411 SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 2,816.24 600 RETROACTIVE PAY RETROACTIVE PAY 0.00 1,954.25 602 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 1.0 108.50 0.00 604 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP TIME 1.5 127.75 0.00 606 COMP HOURS ACCRUED COMP 2.0 4.50 0.00 901 SICK ACCRUED SICK LEAVE -43.38 0.00 acc MISCELLANEOUS ACCREDITATION PAY 0.00 351.82 acs MISCELLANEOUS ACCRED/POLICE SUPPORT 0.00 255.71 colre MISCELLANEOUS Collision Reconstruction ist 0.00 54.76 cpl MISCELLANEOUS TRAINING CORPORAL 0.00 201.58 crt MISCELLANEOUS CERTIFICATION III PAY 0.00 118.83 ctr MISCELLANEOUS CTR INCENTIVES PROGRAM 0.00 240.00 deftat MISCELLANEOUS DEFENSE TATICS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 94.36 det MISCELLANEOUS DETECTIVE PAY 0.00 138.08 03/19/2024 Packet Pg. 167 Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,143 (03/01/2024 to 03/15/2024) Hour Type Hour Class Description Hours Amount det4 MISCELLANEOUS Detective 4% 0.00 972.90 ed1 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 2% 0.00 925.54 ed2 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 4% 0.00 575.92 ed3 EDUCATION PAY EDUCATION PAY 6% 0.00 10,892.65 firear MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR 0.00 532.94 fmla ABSENT FAMILY MEDICAL/NON PAID 88.00 0.00 hol HOLIDAY HOLIDAY 50.00 3,112.84 k9 MISCELLANEOUS K-9 PAY 0.00 269.53 less MISCELLANEOUS LESS LETHAL INSTRUCTOR 0.00 144.62 Iq1 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2% 0.00 1,189.95 Ig11 LONGEVITY LONGEVITY PAY 2.5% 0.00 1,440.10 Ig12 LONGEVITY Longevity 9% 0.00 1,439.16 Ig13 LONGEVITY Longevity 7% 0.00 1,349.83 Ig14 LONGEVITY Longevity 5% 0.00 1,029.67 Iq2 LONGEVITY PAY LONGEVITY PAY 4% 0.00 166.92 Iq3 LONGEVITY PAY LONGEVITY 6% 0.00 289.83 Iq4 LONGEVITY Longevity 1% 0.00 1,235.21 Iq5 LONGEVITY Longevity 3% 0.00 2,937.59 Iq7 LONGEVITY Longevity 1.5% 0.00 582.94 mtc MISCELLANEOUS MOTORCYCLE PAY 0.00 138.08 pfmp ABSENT Paid Family Medical Unpaid/Sup 334.25 0.00 pfms SICK Paid FAMILY MEDICAL/SICK 73.45 3,842.73 pfmv VACATION Paid Family Medical Vacation 82.30 4,382.47 phv MISCELLANEOUS PHYSICAL FITNESS PAY 0.00 2,254.42 st REGULAR HOURS Serqeant Pay 0.00 164.27 str MISCELLANEOUS STREET CRIMES 0.00 219.02 traf MISCELLANEOUS TRAFFIC 0.00 262.90 22,960.13 $1,223,755.82 Total Net Pay: $835,492.20 03/19/2024 Packet Pg. 168 Hour Type Hour Class Payroll Earnings Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,170 (03/07/2024 to 03/07/2024) Description 191 REGULAR HOURS FIRE PENSION PAYMENTS Hours Amount 2.00 2,931.80 2.00 $2,931.80 Total Net Pay: $2,931.80 8.4.b 03/19/2024 Packet Pg. 169 Benefit Checks Summary Report City of Edmonds Pay Period: 1,143 - 03/01/2024 to 03/15/2024 Bank: usbank - US Bank Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 65985 03/20/2024 bpas BPAS 6,568.52 0.00 65986 03/20/2024 chap1 CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE 175.00 0.00 65987 03/20/2024 epoa2 EPOA-POLICE 7,038.00 0.00 65988 03/20/2024 epoa3 EPOA-POLICE SUPPORT 1,030.76 0.00 65989 03/20/2024 icma MISSIONSQUARE PLAN SERVICES 6,195.97 0.00 65990 03/20/2024 flex NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIONS 5,363.01 0.00 65991 03/20/2024 teams TEAMSTERS LOCAL 763 6,808.50 0.00 33,179.76 0.00 Bank: wire - US BANK Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit 3648 03/20/2024 awc AWC 448,931.63 0.00 3654 03/20/2024 edm CITY OF EDMONDS 312.00 0.00 3656 03/20/2024 us US BANK 154,855.56 0.00 3657 03/20/2024 mebt WTRISC FBO #N3177B1 149,248.57 0.00 3658 03/20/2024 pb NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 5,713.79 0.00 3660 03/20/2024 wadc WASHINGTON STATE TREASURER 37,439.56 0.00 3662 03/20/2024 oe OFFICE OF SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 705.00 0.00 797,206.11 0.00 Grand Totals: 830,385.87 0.00 8.4.c d L_ vi v d s w a� c m 0 c� a 0 O L Q Q Q N 0 N M 0 1= 0 a m L ca E E n N Y t1 d t U d C d w C N E t V r r Q 3/19/2024 Packet Pg. 170 8.5 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Council Rules of Procedure Sections 3 Staff Lead: City Clerk Department: City Clerk's Office Preparer: Scott Passey Background/History In 2013, the City Council passed Resolution No. 1295, which adopted Robert's Rules of Order as its parliamentary authority for the conduct of City Council meetings. In December 2013, the Council passed Resolution No. 1306 adopting a Code of Conduct and in June 2015, the Council approved a Code of Ethics by motion. On January 25, 2021, the Council adopted a new Code of Conduct by motion. Because Resolution No. 1295 is limited to parliamentary procedure in the context of Council meetings, such rules do not address many other processes and procedures in the conduct of City business. It is thought that a more comprehensive set of rules would provide greater understanding and transparency about the roles, rights, and responsibilities of councilmembers and facilitate the orderly conduct of business within the context of council meetings. The draft rules of procedure address Council organization, duties of officers, agenda preparation, meeting management, consent agenda, public testimony, decorum, motions, and other important areas. The draft also includes Council's recent adoption of a Code of Conduct as Section 6; this was done to consolidate all applicable rules into one document. It is important to note that many provisions of these rules of procedure are already governed by other codes, statutes, and rulings. Any provision that is footnoted with a citation to the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the Edmonds City Code (ECC), or other statute or ruling is included for ease of reference only and is not intended to be adopted as a rule because it already constitutes governing law. Provisions that are not footnoted with a citation to the RCW or ECC are adopted by City Council resolution as the Council's procedural rules and may be amended at any time by subsequent resolution. On April 6, 2021, the Council passed Resolution 1470, which established that the Council adopted its own Code of Conduct separate from that which applies to the Mayor and members of City boards, commissions, committees, and work groups. The proposed Rules of Procedure and the Code of Conduct were presented and discussed on February 4, 2020, January 26, 2021, and April 6, 2021. For comparison purposes, prior drafts of the rules of procedure are included in the online Council meeting packets of February 4, 2020 and March 3, 2020. On April 6, 2021, a motion was passed to table consideration of the draft Rules of Procedure for a period of three weeks. The draft rules were scheduled on the June 1, 2021 council agenda, but consideration was postponed due to lack of time. Packet Pg. 171 8.5 On August 3, 2021, the Council considered the draft rules, made amendments, and instructed the city attorney to bring back additional language for potential amendments to various sections of the rules. A new Section 7 entitled "Code of Ethics" has been added to incorporate the Code of Ethics adopted by the City Council on June 2, 2015. On February 13, 2024, the PSPHSP Committee considered the proposed rules for Section 3 - Agenda Preparation and Section 8 - Public Testimony. There was consensus to approve both sections but to include an amendment to Section 8 - Public Testimony which would allow an attendee to speak either during audience comments or following the staff report on a specific agenda item. It is proposed that this change apply to in -person attendees and to use a modified sign -in sheet to enable the chair to facilitate public testimony during the meeting. On March 12, 2024, the PSPHSP Committee considered the proposed rules for Section 3 - Agenda Preparation and Section 8 - Public Testimony. There was consensus to place Section 3 on the March 19, 2024 consent agenda and to bring back Section 8 to the next PSPHSP Committee meeting for further deliberation and potential amendments. In consultation with the PSPHSP Committee members and staff involved with previous versions, this version reflects revisions made between Mar 17-Mar 19 to section 3.1 which now more carefully expresses the roles of the City Clerk versus those of the Council President. Recommendation Approve revised Section 3 - Agenda Preparation. Narrative It is thought that approving the draft Rules of Procedure by Section, or in segments, would be the most practical approach to accomplishing this 2024 goal. The draft includes 14 sections, as follows: SECTION 1. AUTHORITY SECTION 2. COUNCIL ORGANIZATION SECTION 3. AGENDA PREPARATION SECTION 4. CONSENT AGENDA SECTION 5. COUNCIL MEETINGS SECTION 6. COUNCIL CONDUCT SECTION 7. CODE OF ETHICS SECTION 8. PUBLIC TESTIMONY SECTION 9. MOTIONS SECTION 10. ITEMS REQUIRING FOUR VOTES SECTION 11. ITEMS REQUIRING A UNANIMOUS VOTE SECTION 12. COUNCIL REPRESENTATION SECTION 13. REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES SECTION 14. SUSPENSION AND AMENDMENT OF RULES Proposed Workplan for Adopting Council Rules of Procedure Address the draft rules of procedure by section or segments, starting with the most Packet Pg. 172 8.5 timely/highest priority section(s). Focus on one segment each month: a. City Clerk and Council staff review and indicate any recommended revisions. b. Council President review. C. Place on agenda for review of Council Committee d. If committee recommends segment for council approval on consent - place on a future consent agenda for approval and implement that segment as adopted policy. e. If committee recommends revisions or full council discussion - add to future council business when agenda time allows. Once all segments are approved, adopt a resolution with the comprehensive set of rules of procedures as an attachment. Attachments: ROP Section 3 Packet Pg. 173 8.5.a Section 3. Agenda Preparation. 3.1 Under the d'reGtiE)R the GE)URGOI President Mayor, the City Clerk ef and will time the ferth brief si E) and plaGe of rneetiRg and setting a general In an administrative capacity. the Citv Clerk receives aaenda topics and preferred dates from the administration for council or council committee aaendas. The same process applies to the extended council meetina aaendas The Citv Clerk provides these inputs to the Council President for aaenda settin in advance of publishing the agenda for the next public meeting. The Council President is responsible for determining which items will be moved forward for council business or moved to a future date. In the same way, the president determines what section of the meetina an item will appear and in what order. The resulting agendas for Council committees and Council regular meetings will set forth a brief general description of each item to be considered by the Council and specify the time and place of the meeting. The agenda for the next council meetina and the extended aaenda are aublished online by the Citv Clerk. 3.2 An item for a Council meeting may be placed on the agenda by one of the following methods: 0 A Majority vote or consensus of the Council. B. By the Council President or Council President Pro Tern when acting in the M absence of the Council President. o The Council President will make every effort to place an item Council Cn approved by consensus or majority vote on an agenda. If time is not 0 available for the requested date, it shall be placed on the next available w agenda. E 3.3 Agenda memos shall be in a standard format. The Mayor shall determine the format. a 3.4 Agenda items will generally be prioritized in the following order of importance: 1) joint meetings or presentations involving outside agencies; 2) items scheduled for statutory compliance; 3) advertised public hearings; 4) continued items from a prior meeting; and 5) items scheduled for convenience, such as those involving outside consultants. 3.5 Except when the Council President has authorized an exception for items of an emergency or unexpected nature requiring immediate action, ordinances scheduled for Council action will receive a minimum of two readings. Action by the Council (by the consent agenda, or council motion and vote) will always be one of the readings. Other reading(s) will be in the number the topic warrants - and could include any or all of the following: I Packet Pg. 174 8.5.a 1. publication on the extended agenda 2. presentation of the topic by staff 3. discussion at council committee and/or meetings of the full council 4. public hearings (sometimes mandated by law) Packet Pg. 175 9.1 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Resolution Adopting Traffic Safety Camera Location Analysis Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History February 2023 - Council passed Ordinance 4292 authorizing the use of automated traffic safety cameras in approved school zone locations and adopting ECC 8.01 automated traffic safety cameras. (attached) November 14, 2023 - (minutes attached) Red Light Camera Presentation to Edmonds City Council by Edmonds Police Department. Public Hearing on Installation of Red Light Cameras During 2024 Budget deliberations, a motion "to deny decision package 7, red light cameras, at this time and reconsider in 2024" passed 5-2. February 20, 2024 - At Council President Olson's request, Red Light Camera Presentation to Edmonds City Council by Edmonds Police Department. (updated slides used during February 20, 2024 presentation and minutes attached) Staff Recommendation Adopt the attached resolution, which summarizes the data received by the Council and adopts the location analysis for the purpose of informing the Council's upcoming decisions to implement, or not implement, the red light traffic safety cameras at any of the nine intersections under consideration. Narrative Council is undertaking an analysis of the possible use of traffic safety cameras at signalized intersections. At the request of Council President Olson, the city attorney has drafted a resolution that, if passed, acknowledges Council's satisfaction with data collected and adopts the analysis provided of proposed intersection locations for stoplight automated traffic safety cameras. The resolution's Exhibit A: Summary of Location Analysis is a table organizing the intersection location data presented to Council in the February 20, 2024 presentation by Chief Bennett. Supporting documents referenced in the February 20, 2024 presentation to council are attached to this agenda memo. The November 6, 2023 SLS Report includes average annual daily traffic and the Verra Mobility rating. A spreadsheet containing 2020-2022 Intersection Accidents data is also attached. New, still -preliminary data of 2023 Accidents displayed in the presentation as a table showing some (not all) intersections with multiple accidents in 2023 is also attached. Packet Pg. 176 9.1 Any decision to authorize the use of traffic safety cameras for any or all of these nine signalized intersection locations will occur not through this resolution but through subsequent council action. Attachments: 2024-03-12 resolution adopting analysis for red-light cameras Exhibit A Summary of Location Analysis Ordinance 4292 pages from November 14, 2023 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL MINUTES pages from Edmonds City Council Minutes February 20, 2024 Presentation - Edmonds Police Redlight Camera Council Meeting 2.15.24 - Updated November 6 2023 SLS Report 2020-2022 Data Red Light Camera Intersections slides with 2023 Data from Edmonds Police Redlight Camera Council Meeting 2.15.24 - Updated Packet Pg. 177 9.1.a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A SECOND TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERA LOCATION ANALYSIS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO RCW 46.63.170 WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature, under Chapter 46.63 RCW, established its intent to promote the public safety and welfare on public highways and facilitate the implementation of a uniform and expeditious system for the disposition of traffic infractions; and WHEREAS, as part of that effort, the Legislature enacted RCW 46.63.170 relating to the use of automated traffic safety cameras; and WHEREAS, that statute authorizes the use of automated traffic safety cameras by local jurisdictions, provided that, before enacting an ordinance allowing for the use of such cameras, the appropriate local legislative authority first prepares an analysis of the locations within the jurisdiction where automated traffic safety cameras are proposed to be located; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted such an analysis for the use of traffic safety cameras in school zones; and WHEREAS, certain school zone traffic safety cameras were subsequently authorized by Ordinance 4292; and WHEREAS, the City Council is now undertaking an analysis of the possible use of traffic safety cameras at signalized intersections; and WHEREAS, the City Council is considering whether to authorize the addition of traffic safety cameras at up to nine specific signalized intersection locations; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after review and discussion, has determined that it is in the best interests of the city to adopt the automated traffic safety camera analysis of these nine signalized intersection locations pursuant to RCW 46.63.170(1)(a); and WHEREAS, any decision to authorize the use of traffic safety cameras for any or all of these nine signalized intersection locations will occur, not through this resolution, but through subsequent council action; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein. Packet Pg. 178 9.1.a Section 2. Adoption of Analysis. Pursuant to RCW 46.63.170(1)(a), the Edmonds City Council hereby adopts the automated traffic safety camera analysis of nine signalized intersection locations, as summarized in the table attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections, or sentences of this Resolution are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Resolution and the same shall remain in full force and effect. RESOLVED this day of March, 2024. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, MIKE ROSEN ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. Packet Pg. 179 9.1.b Exhibit A Summary of Location Analysis 22011 and Highway 99 Average Daily Traffic' 20,000 Accidents in 2020-20222 10 Verra Mobility Analysis Rating3 5.3 2023 Accidents' 12 212th and 76th Average Daily Traffic 6,000 Accidents in 2020-2022 15 Verra Mobility Analysis Rating 4.08 / 4.06 / 3.995 2023 Accidents 4 Highway 104 and 100th Average Daily Traffic 13,000 Accidents in 2020-2022 6 Verra Mobility Analysis Rating 3.5 / 3.42* 2023 Accidents Not yet available 224th and Highway 99 Average Daily Traffic 16,000 Accidents in 2020-2022 12 Verra Mobility Analysis Rating 3.41 2023 Accidents Not yet available 238th and Highway 99 Average Daily Traffic 20,000 Accidents in 2020-2022 5 Verra Mobility Analysis Rating 4.72 2023 collisions Not yet available 216th and Highway 99 Average Daily Traffic 20,000 Accidents in 2020-2022 5 Verra Mobility Analysis Rating 3.68 2023 Accidents Not yet available 228th and Highway 99 Average Daily Traffic 16,000 Accidents in 2020-2022 3 Verra Mobility Analysis Rating 4.05 2023 collisions 5 212th and Highway 99 Average Daily Traffic 20,000 Accidents in 2020-2022 2 Verra Mobility Analysis Rating 3.1 2023 Accidents Not yet available 220th and 76th Average Daily Traffic 12,000 Accidents in 2020-2022 13 Verra Mobility Analysis Rating 2.91 2023 Accidents 6 ' Source: City of Edmonds, presented to Council February 20, 2024 2 Source: Edmonds Police Department, presented to Council February 20, 2024 3 Source: Verra Mobility, presented to Council February 20, 2024 4 Source. preliminary 2023 data, Edmonds Police Department, presented to Council February 20, 2024 5 When more than one Verra Mobility rating exists, individual directions of the intersections were rated. Packet Pg. 180 9.1.c ORDINANCE NO.4292 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE USE OF AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERAS IN APPROVED LOCATIONS AND ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 8.10 (AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERAS); PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CORRECTIONS; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, in 2022, the City initiated a pedestrian safety campaign and expressed interest in the use of automated traffic safety cameras, as governed by RCW 46.63.170; and WHEREAS, in 2022, the Washington State Legislature adopted amendments to that statute to authorize the use of such cameras in additional areas, including on any roadway identified in a school walk area, as well as in the previously authorized school speed zones; and WHEREAS, RCW 46.63.170 requires that local legislative authorities prepare an analysis of proposed camera locations, and the City Council has approved Resolution No. 1514 to adopt the required analysis prepared at the request of City staff; and WHEREAS, RCW 46.63.170 requires that the City provide public notice and signage relating to the automated traffic safety cameras, to include signs following the specifications of the manual of uniform traffic control devices that clearly indicate that the driver is within a school walk area or that the driver is entering an area where speed violations are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Police Department has coordinated with the City Engineer to provide the public with the required notice and signage; and WHEREAS, RCW 46.63.170 requires that the City post annual reports with traffic accident and infraction information and other relevant information about the automated traffic safety cameras that the City deems appropriate on the City's website; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Police Department has coordinated with other City departments to generate and post the reports required under the statute; and Packet Pg. 181 9.1.c WHEREAS, the City Council approves the use of automated traffic safety cameras at the locations identified in the City's location analysis in school speed zones and school walk areas within the City of Edmonds in accordance with the provisions of RCW 46.63.170; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Authorization. City staff is authorized to install, operate, maintain and administer five (5) automated traffic safety cameras at the locations identified in the City's location analysis in school speed zones and school walk areas within the City of Edmonds in accordance with the provisions of RCW 46.63.170, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to enter into any necessary agreements to effectuate this purpose. Section 2. Adoption of New Code Section. A new Chapter 8.10 as set forth in full in the document attached to this ordinance is hereby adopted into the Edmonds City Code. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Corrections. The City Clerk is authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance and the new Chapter 8.10 ECC including, but not limited to, the correction of scrivener's and clerical errors, references, numbering, and any references thereto. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum, and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. APPROVED: MAY MIKE NELSON 2 Packet Pg. 182 9.1.c ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: CIT RK, COTT EY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY JEFF TARADA FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: February 17, 2023 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: February 21, 2023 PUBLISHED: February 24, 2023 EFFECTIVE DATE: March 1, 2023 ORDINANCE NO. 4292 Packet Pg. 183 9.1.c SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.4292 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 21" day of February 2023, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 4292. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE USE OF AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERAS IN APPROVED LOCATIONS AND ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 8.10 (AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERAS); PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND CORRECTIONS; AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 21" day of February 2023. 4 CLERK, SCOTTIPASSEY Packet Pg. 184 9.1.c Chapter 8.10 AUTOMATED TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERAS Sections: 8.10.010 Automated traffic safety cameras - Detection of violations - Restrictions. 8.10.020 Notice of infraction. 8.10.030 Prima facie presumption. 8.10.040 Infractions processed. 8.10.050 Fine. 8.10.060 Nonexclusive enforcement. 8.10.010 Automated traffic safety cameras - Detection of violations - Restrictions. A. City law enforcement officers and persons commissioned by the Edmonds police chief are authorized to use automated traffic safety cameras and related automated systems to detect and record the image of: (1) school speed zone violations; and (2) speed zone violations on any roadway identified in a school walk area as defined by RCW 28A.160.160; provided, however, pictures of the vehicle and the vehicle license plate may be taken only while an infraction is occurring, and the picture shall not reveal the face of the driver or of any passengers in the vehicle. B. Before adding additional cameras or relocating any existing camera to a new location, an analysis of the locations where automatic traffic safety cameras are proposed must be presented to the city council for approval. C. Each location where an automated safety camera is used shall be clearly marked by signs and/or flashing beacons placed in locations that clearly indicate to a driver that the driver is entering a zone where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera. D. "Automated traffic safety camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in conjunction with a speed measuring device, and a camera synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle whenever a vehicle exceeds a speed limit to a school speed zone or school walk area as detected by a speed measuring device. 1 8.10.020 Notice of infraction. A. A notice of infraction must be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle within 14 days of the violation, or to the renter of a vehicle within 14 days of establishing the renter's name and address. A person receiving a notice of infraction based on evidence detected by an automated traffic safety camera may respond to the notice by mail. Packet Pg. 185 9.1.c B. If the registered owner of the vehicle is a rental car business, the law enforcement agency shall, before a notice of infraction is issued, provide a written notice to the rental car business that a notice of infraction may be issued to the rental car business if the rental car business does not, within 18 days of receiving the written notice, provide to the agency by return mail: (1) a statement under oath stating the name and known mailing address of the individual driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred; or (2) a statement under oath that the business is unable to determine who was driving or renting the vehicle when the infraction occurred; or (3) in lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car business may pay the applicable penalty. Timely mailing of this statement to the agency shall relieve the rental car business of any liability under this chapter for the infraction. C. The law enforcement officer issuing a notice of infraction shall include with it a certificate or facsimile thereof, based upon the inspection of photographs, microphotographs or electronic images produced by an automated traffic safety camera, citing the infraction and stating the facts supporting the notice of infraction. This certificate or facsimile shall be prima facie evidence of the facts contained in it and shall be admissible in a proceeding charging a violation under this chapter. The photographs, microphotographs or electronic images evidencing the violation must be available for inspection and admission into evidence in a proceeding to adjudicate the liability for the infraction. D. The registered owner of a vehicle is responsible for an infraction detected through the use of an automated traffic safety camera unless the registered owner overcomes the presumption set forth in EMC 8.10.030, or, in the case of a rental car business, satisfies the conditions under subsection B of this section. if appropriate under the circumstances, a renter identified under subsection B of this section is responsible for an infraction. E. All photographs, microphotographs or electronic images prepared under this chapter are for the exclusive use of law enforcement in the discharge of duties under this chapter and, as provided in RCW 46.63.170(1)(i), they are not open to the public and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding relates to a violation under this chapter. No photograph, microphotograph or electronic image may be used for any purpose other than enforcement of violations under this chapter nor retained longer than necessary to enforce this chapter. 8.10.10.030 Prima facie presumption. A. In a traffic infraction case involving an infraction detected through the use of an automated traffic safety camera under this chapter, proof that the particular vehicle described in the notice of traffic infraction was involved in a stoplight violation or school speed zone violation, together with proof that the person named in the notice of infraction was at the time of the violation the registered owner of the vehicle, shall constitute in evidence a prima facie presumption that the registered owner of the vehicle was the person in control of the vehicle at the point where, and for the time during which, the violation occurred. Packet Pg. 186 9.1.c B. This presumption may be overcome only if the registered owner, under oath, states in a written statement to the court or in testimony before the court that the vehicle involved was, at the time, stolen or in the care, custody or control of some person other than the registered owner. I 8.10.040 Infractions processed. Infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety cameras shall be processed in the same manner as parking infractions. 8.10.050 Fine. The fine for an infraction detected under authority of this chapter shall be a base monetary penalty of $130.00; and provided further, that whenever, in the future, the state of Washington increases the fine imposed under this chapter, by legislation or court rule, the city's fine shall be increased to a like amount upon the effective date of such legislation or court rule. 8.10.060 Nonexclusive enforcement. Nothing in this chapter prohibits a law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.63.030(1)(a), (b) or (c). Packet Pg. 187 9.1.c Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: that he/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH972164 ORDINANCE 4292/4293 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement fornn thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 02/24/2023 and ending on 02/24/2023 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amount the fee for s h publication is P Uncia $37.84. My P r_==_ b 'sJ'" ,25 Subscribed and sworn bef re me on this day ,,t /i Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. Cay of Edmonds- LEGAL ADS 114101416 SCOTI PASSEY Packet Pg. 188 Classified Proof 9.1.c OF:DINANCE SLlh+1_.tARY uFlhz Cdy GI drclrm OgjllnAran On Phe 71%1 clay 0I Fatru0Fy 2023 Itie Coy Cauncu Or IIN@ Clty OI FW&l5ntl5. passed lnI following OFalrlafAe5- !hO sum n14rICS Of sa ra Ordinamas Lansm%ing of atlas are prOVIded SS 1p1I0 Yy: L')ROlN0.NCE NO 4242 AN ORDINANCE � CI:Y OF £DFJONDS 1NASii NGTON. AUTHORIZING -IHE USE OF ALTOMATED TRAFFIC SAFETY CAMERAS IN APPROVE.O LOCATIONS AND ADOPTING. A NEW CHAPTER 8.10 (AUTOMATE© TRAFFIC SAFETY GAMERAS); PROVIDoNG FOR SEVERABILITY AND CORRECTION& AND SETTING AN EFFECTIVF DATE, 6RDIplANt;E N(}, q28? AN ORDNANCE d• THE MY OF EDMONDS. WASHINGSON. CHANGING THE REGULAR MEETING TIME OF THE CITY COUNCIL'S PUBLIC SAFETY PLANNING, HUMAN SERvICE.S. AND PERSONNEL CPSPHSP') GOI.IMITTEE DATED1hls 7.ta+Day of F®hrunry. 2023. CITY CLERK. SCO PASS EDH9721fiA Pubrf51led: February 24. 2023 Proofed by Phillips, Linda, 02/24/2023 02:22:31 pm .N m a C O O J m d E U m cn U w L Q O Q O 3 O 0) Nd LPL (V cn N d U C m C a L 0 C d E t m Q Page: 2 Packet Pg. 189 9.1.d 1. WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS 2. PUBLIC WORKS UPDATE 3RD QUARTER 2023 6. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Peter Moon, Edmonds, a resident on Olympic View Drive, thanked the city council, mayor and engineering department for listening to their concerns about speeding on Olympic View Dive. The situation was studied and action is being taken to install four speed tables in the near future which will, 1) improve public safety for pedestrian, cyclists and residents on Olympic View Drive (all his neighbors are in favor); 2) result in a reduction in traffic speeds, and 3) potentially reduce the overall traffic volumes because it will no longer be the fast backdoor in/out of Edmonds. He assured there will be complaints because people do not like change. He suggested being prepared for those complaints by having an online form for people to provide their contact information, a description of their complaint, and the reason for the complaint so that the people complaining are held accountable and it is reasonable to listen to all comments pro and con. He thanked the City for taking their concerns seriously, studying the matter and taking action which will benefit the community as a whole. Greg Goodman, Edmonds, Mr. Moon's neighbor, thanked the council and staff for listening to them, analyzing the data and recognizing there was a hazard. He acknowledged not everyone would like the calming tables, but he anticipated they would get over it. For the councilmembers who are moving on, he thanked them for their service. He recognized traffic is an issue all over City, commenting on an issue he experienced yesterday at the 4-way stop at the fountain on 5' & Main. He suggested doing something there like a signal because currently drivers don't stop and pedestrians crisscross across the street. 7. CONSENT AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM OLSON, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda item approved is as follows: AUTHORIZING VACATION ACCRUAL FOR A CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGER CANDIDATE 8. COUNCIL BUSINESS 1. RED LIGHT CAMERA PRESENTATION Police Chief Michelle Bennett introduced Assistant Police Chief Rod Sniffen and Commander Dave Machado and advised there is a Verra Mobility representative available virtually to answer technical questions related to the system. She explained the presentation is designed to address some misconceptions and clarify why red light cameras are proposed. She reviewed: • Decision package 7 o The proposed red-light cameras enforcement system (assuming approval and agreement modification) will take several months into 2024 to engineer, install and incorporate into the eco-system we are currently designing for school zone cameras o For 2024, best case scenario is having them operational by May, so for the remaining eight months of the year they would be functional ■ For 2025 and beyond, they would be operational year-round ■ There is a 30-day warning period o In justification section: 3-5 red light camera intersections proposed as a pilot program • Comparable data o The intersections suggested are the highest volume intersection related accidents. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 2 Packet Pg. 190 9.1.d o The cities of Lynnwood and Lake Forest Park have red-light cameras, many other agencies (Everett, Bothell) are also looking at them. o The city of Lynnwood is a relevant comparable city 0 2022 Annual Automated Traffic Safety Camera Report Lynnwood Police Department Per RCW 46.63.170 cities using automated traffic safety cameras must post an annual report of the number of traffic accidents that occurred at each location where an automated traffic safety camera is located. as well as the number of notices of infraction issued for each camera on the City s websile. The below data comprises the number of accidents and citations issued at each respective intersection and school zone where traffic safety cameras are deployed. Intersection Number of citations 'Number of Accidents 361h 1196th St S.W. 6,070 3 "I" I Aid. Mall Blvd. 3,514 8(") 441h 1196ih St S.W. 0 - Under Construction. 6 184111 Aid. Mall Pkwy 4,728 6 1961h 1 Ald. Mall Pkwy 14,163 2 Maple I Ald, Mall Pkwy 1,900 3 1961h 1 Hwy 99 2,834 5 "in / 2001h St S.W. 5,063 8 " Hwy 9912001h St S.W. 1,164 3 School Zone Number of Citations Number of Accidents 18200.18800 BILK 44th Ave West 4,175 1 5500 - 6600 BLK 168th St S.W. 2,660 4 Number of Accidents reported reflect collisions occurring wdhin the intersection. e Red light camera accident reductions Lynnwood Red Light Camera Collisions �w o In 10 years, 114% decrease in actions. Although there was a small upward trend in the last 2- 3 years minor, there has been a significant reduction in accidents. Edmonds Proposed Pilot red light cameras program: Collision data o Data for the intersections from 2020-2022 was collected o These intersections were considered based off collision data, as well as with input from the officers who investigate collisions the most o Officers also considered their observations of high pedestrian areas and areas of citizen complaints Commander Machado provided anecdotal evidence of what he sees while on patrol on a daily basis, all hours of the day as his shifts fluctuate between days and graveyard hours. He assured if he left the station now and made his way to 220' & Highway 99 going through a number of these intersections, as someone who tends to observe and in spite of being in a police car, in uniform and performing the function of Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 3 Packet Pg. 191 9.1.d traffic enforcement, he would likely see violations of this type at each intersection. As to why he doesn't do something about it, he explained the function of traffic enforcement and the ability to observe red-light violations are two different things. For example, if he is 1-2 cars back at the intersection of 84' & 220' he may see a violation, a near miss, which is often overlooked in the aggregate of the danger margin. When he is 1-2 cars back, he likely would be unable to do anything about the red-light violator due to the speed, transition to the intersection and ability to get into a position to do something. State law requires to enforce that infraction, he or one of his partners must see it happen. For example, if Assistant Chief Sniffen was at the other side of the intersection, he could tell him and he could intervene. In the big scheme of things, it is a relatively high labor function to intervene and create a safety margin to deal with one motorist doing a red light violation. Commander Machado explained the police's function is safety so when they can, they make an effort to intervene. The difference between face-to-face intervention and technology -based intervention is dramatic. A technology intervention as it relates to modifying human behavior as a driver approaches the dangerous process of arriving at an intersection is an opportunity to leverage the safety parameter. From the human performance and human behavior, it is usually mostly human behavior because when a driver sees a yellow light, they are supposed to slow down, analyze the circumstances and proceed with caution, that is generally the most risky behavior. Chief Bennett continued her presentation • Accidents: Three years of data 2020-2022 in proposed intersections o Intersections were researched based on traffic volumes and high numbers of accidents Location and Accident Data: Car Volume per day 0 220t' & Highway 99: 10 accidents, 20,000 cars/day 0 220' & 76'h: 13 accidents, 12,000 cars/day 0 212t' & 76'a': 15 accidents, 6,000 cars/day o Highway 104 & 100': 6 accidents, 13,000 cars/day 0 238' & Highway 99: 4 accidents, 20,000 cars/day 0 228' & Highway 99: 2 accidents, 16,000 cars/day Accident data for above accidents was reviewed by Chief Bennett and Sergeant Strum Chief Bennett explained her friends own a driving school; they show a video that asks how many accidents are okay. For her, any accident should be prevented, the target is zero. The way she looks at the data, the intersection with 15 accidents in a 3-year period, that is 15 too many and illustrates there is a problem at that intersection. She noted the accidents are ones that actually resulted in cars crashing, it does not include near misses or issues with that type of driving behavior. The number one complaint the police department receives is speeding and cars driving recklessly. It is not unusual that the police department would try to address this behavior since it is the number one complaint. With the police department's limited resources, they do in -person traffic enforcement, but in addition to being short staffed, they cannot be everywhere because the City is large geographically and there are 16,000-20,000 cars on Highway 99 per day. A lot of those drivers don't live in Edmonds, but they still use the roadways and their driving behaviors potentially putting drivers at risk. Assistant Chief Rod Sniffen explained Verra Mobility is the contractor the City is using for the school zone camera project. They are well known and do this work throughout the country including many systems in Washington State. He displayed a sample of the analysis performed by Verra Mobility that the RCW requires before installing red-light cameras. Their analysis looks at traffic volumes, topography, and many other factors that go into an algorithm that determines an SLS factor that rates intersections for automated enforcement. He reviewed: • Highest rating per Verra Mobility (combined with accidents and average per day car volume) Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 4 Packet Pg. 192 9.1.d 0 220t' & Highway 99: 5.3 (10 accidents) 20,000 cars/day 0 238t1' & Highway 99, southbound: 4.72 (4 accidents) 20,000 cars/day 0 228t' & Highway 99: 4.05 (2 accidents) 16,000 cars/day 0 212t' & 761'' Northbound: 4.08 (15 accidents) 6,000 cars/day 0 212' & 76t' Westbound: 4.06 (15 accidents) 6,000 cars/day 0 212t' & 76t' Eastbound: 3.99 (15 accidents) 6,000 cars/day 0 238' & Highway 99, Northbound: 3.91 (4 accidents) 16,000 cars/day o Highway 104 & 100t'' Southbound: 3.5 (6 accidents) 13,000 cars/day o Highway 104 & 100t1i Northbound: 3.42 (6 accidents) 13,000 cars/day o Highway 104 & 100t' Westbound: 3.19 (6 accidents) 13,000 cars/day Chief Bennett continued: • Other intersections with high traffic volume and ratings but not currently proposed o SR 99 & 216t'': 20,000 cars per day, Verra Rating — 3.68 o SR 99 & 224t'': 16,000 cars per day, Verra Rating — 3.41 o SR 99 & 212t'': 20,000 cars per day, Verra Rating — 3.1 Chief Bennett added if this was simply a funding mechanism, there would be cameras proposed at all the intersections. That is not the proposal, the proposal is to address traffic safety. Assistant Chief Sniffen said Verra Mobility considers a rating of 2.7 or higher a viable location for a traffic camera system. Chief Bennett said that is a result of Verra's data analysis and observing red-light camera infractions. Though there may not be as many accidents at these intersections, there are clearly red light running occurring. Pedestrian Accidents 0 20t' & Highway 99 — 1 0 212t' & 76' — 2 o Hwy 104 & 100t' — 0 0 238t' & Highway 99 — 0 0 238t' & Highway 99 — 0 0 228t' & Highway 99 - 0 Empirical Research says: o Road crashes are a prime cause of death and disability and red-light running is a common cause of crashes at signalized intersections ■ Red-light cameras are increasingly used to promote compliance with traffic signals ■ Manual enforcement methods are resource intensive and high risk, whereas red-light cameras can operate 24 hours a day and do not involve high speed pursuits o More than one million crashes occur annually at traffic signals in the United States and red- light cameras increasingly are being used to supplement police enforcement efforts by automatically photographing vehicles whose drivers run red lights o Red light running at signalized intersections is a significant problem in the United States; it results in more than 95,000 crashes and approximately 1,000 deaths per year ■ Red light camera systems aimed at reducing this problem have become a popular tool in local jurisdictions Today's My Edmonds News: o In Washington state, traffic fatalities were up 38% last year compared with 2019, reaching a 30-year high. In response, the state is considering expanding its limited speed camera use. State officials plan a visit to Finland next month to see how that country used automated enforcement to reduce traffic deaths o "Law enforcement has really stepped back from enforcing traffic law," said Jonathan Adkins, CEO of the Governors Highway Safety Association. "We have to get police back out there and get support for police back. But this has to be done the right way, and it has to be done Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 5 Packet Pg. 193 9.1.d fairly. And we do want to look at technology - cameras don't see race, they don't see gender." o Edmonds police on Sunday afternoon were called to the scene of a vehicle collision in the Perrinville neighborhood where two pedestrians were struck near 76t' Avenue West and Olympic View Drive. Both patients were transported to Seattle's Harborview Medical Center. Seven empirical studies related to red light cameras, all indicating red light cameras are effective at reducing total casualty crashes o Academic research ■ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine ■ Insurance Institute for Highway Safety - Article entitled "Effects of turning off and on red-light cameras on fatal crashes in large U.S. Cities." All fatal crashes at signalized intersections in 14 cities that terminated camera programs during 2010-14 were 30 and 16 percent higher, respectively, after cameras were turned off than would have been expected had cameras remained. - Article entitled, "Effects of red light camera enforcement on red light violations in Arlington County, Virginia." Consistent with prior research, red light violations at camera -enforced intersections declined significantly. Reductions were greater the longer after the light turned red, when violations are more likely to cause crashes. ■ Safety Evaluationof Red -Light Cameras, Federal Highway Administration - Similar in direction but somewhat smaller in magnitude than those indicated in past studies. Right-angle crashes (the surrogate for red-light running crashes) decrease significantly. ■ National Library of Medicine - Article entitled, "Effects of red light running camera systems installation and then deactivation on intersection safety." The results indicate statistically significant collision reductions on all red-light running (RLR) crash types (37%) as well as right- angle RLR crashes (47%) at the treated intersections after RLC activation. - Article entitled, "Red-light cameras for the prevention of road traffic crashes." Authors' conclusions: red-light cameras are effective in reducing total casualty crashes - Article entitled "Reductions in injury crashes associated with red light camera enforcement in Oxnard, California." Overall, crashes at signalized intersections throughout Oxnard were reduced by 7% and injury crashes were reduced by 29%. Right angle crashes, those most associated with red light violations, were reduced by 32%; right angle crashes involving injuries were reduced by 68%. Because red light cameras can be a permanent component of the transportation infrastructure, crash reductions attributed to camera enforcement should be sustainable. ■ Journal of Safety Research ■ TRB Annual Meeting - Article entitled, "Evaluation of red-light camera enforcement in Fairfax, VA, USA." One year after enforcement began, violation rates were lower at all camera and noncamera sites. Overall reductions at the five camera sites were 7% 3 months after enforcement began and 44% after one year. Didn't some cities do away with red light cameras? o Called Kent Police Chief Padilla, "Heck no, they are very effective for the city, we are actually adding six more. Also funded our body worn camera program." When asked if year- end collisions increased, he stated they have actually gone down. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 6 Packet Pg. 194 9.1.d o Communicated with Redmond Police Lieutenant Julie Bear and Chief Darrell Lowe, "We had them in around 2012 for several months. Microsoft lobbied hard (with company attorneys assisting) against them. We've been talking about putting them back." o Communication sent to Burien Chief Ted Boe, who said they have "not had them in at least six years, speculated reason for removal was labor based, lowest staffed city and most calls per service in King County; no new officers in 12 years. No traffic cars or motor officers assigned to the city. We have 26 cops to handle 21,000 calls per year." o Kenmore is adding two cameras this year o Everett is also considering adding traffic cameras o Edmonds decision last year to start with school zone cameras and then look at red-light cameras Recommended Pilot Program Red -Light Camera Sites: Three intersections with highest number of accidents, highest daily traffic and highest rating from Verra Mobility of people running red lights 1. 220t' & Highway 99: 5.3 (10 accidents) 20,000 cars/day o One approach 2. 212t' & 76t1i: 4.08 (15 accidents) 6,000 cars/day o Three approaches 3. Highway 104 & 100r'': 3.5 (6 accidents) 13,000 cars/day o Three approaches Potential intersections for future evaluation 1. 238t' & Highway 99 Southbound: 4.72 (4 accidents) 20,000 cars/day 2. 228t' & Highway 99: 4.05 (2 accidents) 16,000 cars/day Are the costs of the cameras offset or will they cost the city additional money? o Verra charges $5,000/camera/month ■ Seven cameras would be $35,000 total/month o Court costs: monthly 2,475 tickets = $17,859 + $5,000 (est. cost $24,900 per month) 2,475 tickets a month would be 82.5/day = 11 per camera/day o Police costs are currently neutral ■ 2,475 tickets per month x $130 average fine = $321,000 - $24,900 costs - $262,000 delta in the positive per month and $3,144,000/year ■ 1680 tickets per month x $130 average fine = $262,000 - $21,700 costs - $229,300 delta in the positive per month and $2,751,600/year What is the impact related to court costs? o In Lynnwood Municipal Court, 18.5% of people who received parking citations in 2022 requested a hearing ■ Individuals who request a hearing may choose whether to appear in -person or remotely ■ IRLJ 2.6 requires that hearings be set within 120 days from the date of the notice of infraction o Edmonds Municipal Court (EMC) currently conducts pro se infractions hearings on the second and fourth Fridays of the month ■ These hearings take place from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., and 1 p.m. to 2 p.m. ■ Current calendars allow for 80 pro se infraction hearings per month ■ Typically, ten infraction hearings are scheduled per hour, which provides an average of six minutes per hearing ■ Workload impact assuming 2,475 red light citations per month with 18.5% of individuals cited requesting a hearing, this will result in an additional 458 infraction hearings per month. This is a 572% increase in the number of infraction hearings that EMC conducts each month Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 7 Packet Pg. 195 9.1.d - The increase in hearings would require EMC to move from infractions being held on two days per month to 13.5 days per month Assuming 2,475 citations per month, EMC estimates that the increased court clerk workload from red-light cameras would require an additional 2 to 3 FTEs - The annual salary of a court clerk at Step 1 is $65,184. Including benefits, the total annual cost for one court clerk is $84,739 - This would result in a monthly cost per court clerk of $7,061 - If two additional court clerks were needed, the monthly cost would be $14,122 - If three additional court clerks were needed, the monthly cost would be $21,183 Additional capacity could be created by increasing pro tempore judge budget and brining in an additional judicial officer to preside over additional calendars - This would result in an estimated additional cost of $3,337 per month Assuming 2,475 citations per month, EMC estimates that its increased monthly costs would be between $17,859 and $24,920 Assuming a total of 1,60 citations per month with 18.5% of individuals cited requesting a hearing, this will result in an additional 311 infraction hearings per month. - This is a 389% increase in the number of infraction hearings that EMC conducts each month ■ The increase in hearings would require EMC to move from infraction hearings being held two days per month to ten days per month ■ Additional capacity can be created by increasing the pro tempore judge budget and bringing in an additional judicial officer to preside over additional calendars. This would result in an estimated additional cost of $2,600 per month. ■ Assuming 1,680 citations per month, EMC estimates that the increased court clerk workload from red light cameras would require an additional 2 FTEs. EMC estimates that its increased monthly costs would be $16,722. What are the impacts to Police? o Conservatively, based on conversations with Lynnwood PD, it takes approximately one minute to review three tickets o In speaking with the Edmonds traffic sergeant, this workload would be split up among multiple officers, thereby minimizing the workload and staying current with the volume o The infraction that is sent to the violator with a picture of the violation, the steps on how to respond to the infraction, and a hyperlink to view a video f the violation online ■ The steps on how to respond to the infraction are decided by the court ■ There is a boilerplate narrative from police on each ticket 0 2,475 tickets per month, divided by 3 tickets a minute = 825 minutes per month (or 13.75 hours/month) 0 1,680 tickets per month, divided by 3 tickets a minute = 560 minutes per month (or 9.3 hours/month) o Does not require additional staffing at this time. What does the offender get in the mail? o Notice of the violation that identifies options and includes links to video What the offender sees when the click on the hyperlink o Video and/or image associated with violation o Additional resources What about school zones? o Schools in Edmonds currently in the process of getting cameras ■ Chase Lake Elementary ■ Westgate Elementary ■ Edmonds-Woodway High School ■ Scriber Lake High School Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 8 Packet Pg. 196 9.1.d o To add additional school zone cameras, we would have to request the vendor come out and do a speed study to determine whether that specific school would qualify for a speed camera o Cameras should be up in January o There is a 30-day warning period Councilmember Paine thanked Chief Bennett for the fantastic information. She recalled a public comment last week that the City should not install red light cameras because they are heavy handed and do not take into consideration other options. She appreciated the police department's lens of using safety controls better. As Commander Machado said, there is a need for situational awareness at every intersection. She asked how car versus pedestrian near misses are calculated, assuming there was a mathematical equation that provides a ratio for every person hit, there have been numerous near misses. Commander Machado referred to 220t1i & Highway 99 which is one of the intersection proposed for the pilot which has seven north -south lanes and five east -west lanes. The features of a red light violator tend to include an acceleration of speed and a follow through with very little time and responsiveness. A pedestrian in that situation who is managing their movement lawfully and responsibility utilizing pedestrian signals, as they receive a walk signal and begin crossing, that near miss factor becomes extremely problematic because everyone involved must engage in a perception reality; the walker may need to stop suddenly, other drivers about to get the green have to pause. Commander Machado realized that explanation did not answer Councilmember Paine's question with specificity related to data sets, but that is the anecdotal reality of what happens light cycle to light cycle. There are so many moving parts and the idea of automated enforcement endeavors to create an environment where drivers approach an intersection with due caution and attentiveness that the realities of 12 lanes requires. Councilmember Paine said she was hoping for a ratio but understood that would be a tough calculation. She wanted to apply that to the pedestrian environment impacts in neighborhoods and if there were any noted human behavior characterization at camera -enforced intersections. She recalled from drivers ed, the pedestrian has the right-of-way at any intersection. She asked if situational awareness and drivers' behavior changed at intersections in areas surrounding a camera -enforced intersection. Assistant Chief Sniffen answered data regarding near miss collisions is typically not collected. Human behavior tends to improve at intersections near a camera controlled intersection because drivers may be unsure which intersections are controlled. Putting cameras at 220th & Highway 99 would likely impact human behavior at nearby entrances and exits and even up to 84th Chief Bennett clarified the goal is not to ticket anyone, the goal is for drivers to follow the law. She was confused by people complaining about red light cameras because drivers are either following the law or they are not. She did not want to cite anyone and would love for the program to be a dismal failure although she knew it would not. The goal is to change behavior. Drivers receive ample warning of a camera controlled intersection including signs and notification from navigation apps. Running a red light is very risky behavior that could and often does lead to an accident. The mere signage changes driver behavior. She may or may not have received a red light ticket and she now approaches red lights with caution. She noted pedestrians often do not look as they walk into the street because they have the right- of-way. Commander Machado said when he pulls someone over on a traffic violation, he often tells them, "nobody needs another bill in their life." His friend got a red light camera ticket and told everyone how upset they were about it. He welcomed that and hoped drivers would tell others. The process of driving a motor vehicle in an intersection involves numerous variables that require a human to do a bunch of things at the same time. He compared it to trying to parallel park while your dog is barking and you are listening to your favorite song as loud as possible. That driver would probably turn down the radio, tell their dog to Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 9 Packet Pg. 197 9.1.d be quiet so they could parallel park. That process is effectively the same collection of things that humans have to do when they arrive at an intersection. If people can be empowered to make good choices as they are meandering in the roadway particularly as they arrive at an intersection, that maximizes capacity to create a safer environments. Councilmember Paine commented she would be in therapy for the rest of her life if she hit and killed someone. Council President Pro Tem Olson said because this was brought up as a budget revenue first, she was very predisposed to be against it and that is what the council is also hearing from residents, that it is not responsible to begin looking at this as a revenue source. She listened to the presentation with interest and is definitely thinking about the information provided and good points were made. She thanked the police department for putting together such a good presentation and for providing the data. She specifically appreciated, 1) so many of the intersections where people run red lights, but may not generate a lot of accidents, red light cameras would not be installed there, and 2) the explanation of why cities with red light cameras are discontinuing them and the three examples. She did not understand the explanation about labor being a reason Burien discontinued their cameras. Chief Bennett explaining Burien does not have any traffic officers or sergeants to review the tickets. Burien has very high traffic counts and likely generated a high volume of tickets. When a department is that short staffed on patrol, it creates a perfect storm of who will review the tickets within the required 15 days. She recalled hearing from Burien, "it just became such a hassle." She did not think it had anything to do with traffic safety; it was related to the need for officers to review each ticket and Burien did not have the staff to do that. Council President Pro Tem Olson referred to hardship and people unable to pay, she wanted there to be a consequence in fairness to the process and in support of the idea of trying to change behavior such as requiring an hour of community service and not just letting those drivers off the hook. Chief Bennett answered that is a court process; the EMC is pretty good about hardship and alternatives to monetary penalty. Council President Pro Tem Olson commented due to the fact that this was brought up as budget revenue first, she probably will not support it as part of the budget process. However, outside of the budget process, if after studying all the materials it seemed like a good idea, a policy could be adopted and the program added as a budget amendment. The issue of fairness in fact or in appearance is part of the public's perception. Chief Bennett commented this was discussed length last year with the mayor and amongst themselves and it had nothing to do with the budget. Her original idea when the school zone cameras were considered was to also do red light cameras knowing the traffic safety issues in the City, car -pedestrian accidents and vehicular accidents. When she asked the mayor about red light cameras, he suggested baby steps and starting with school zone cameras and see how those go. There were a lot of kinks to work out with the school zone cameras but once they learned red light cameras could be added as an addendum to the contract, it seemed like a reasonable pilot program to start to impact driver behavior especially with the increase in traffic accidents and fatalities. Council President Pro Tem Olson said most people have noticed an uptick in reckless driving, not just speeding that exceeds the limit by 5 mph but 20+ mph. Councilmember Teitzel thanked the police department for the additional data. He was not inherently opposed to the concept, recognizing there was good rationale. However, he agreed with Council President Pro Tem Olson that coming to the council in the sausage making process of the budget gives the appearance of it being a revenue related issue. He recognized Chief Bennett felt it was a safety related issue but the optics aren't good. He believed it should be decoupled from the budget and considered next year as a separate item to give the new council time to dig into the information which the council saw for the first time tonight as much of this data was not in the decision package. There is lot of nuance and detail as well as a lot of citizen concern that needs to be considered before proceeding. He reiterated he was not inherently opposed to the idea but it needed further analysis and research by council. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 10 Packet Pg. 198 9.1.d Councilmember Teitzel referred to cities that have had cameras and removed them. It was his understanding Burien and Auburn removed their cameras and asked if Chief Bennett spoke to those police departments about the rationale. Chief Bennett said she mentioned Burien in her presentation and it was her understanding that Auburn still has red light cameras, but she could doublecheck. Councilmember Teitzel said he read Auburn was removing their cameras. Council needs to see data from those cities to see what caused that decision. He concluded more consideration and time was needed so he would not support including red light cameras in the budget process, but would certainly support considering it second quarter 2024. Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for the detailed analysis and the pilot project approach. He recalled going to the Chief Bennett's office a year ago after receiving numerous complaints about speeding and driver behavior and ways to mitigate those situations. Red light cameras was one of the recommendations. He recognized the desire for public safety drives this proposal, but in terms of how this works with the budget, he questioned the estimate of $3.5 million in revenue in the proposed budget when the cameras at three intersections would be operational May -December. Chief Bennett answered the numbers she provided are for the three intersections. She noted the three members of the police department who are present have about 100 years of collective experience and are all very interested in safety. With regard to the perceptions about this as a budget item, she assured this was brought up a year ago. She cannot control discussions that were or were not happening, but this is something she has been asking about for two years. Now that the Verra Mobility contract is in place, it is a great time to add red light cameras. Chief Bennett reiterated the goal would be to write no tickets, but the data sets show it is cost neutral. If implementing red light cameras sooner rather than later can save one accident, two accidents, three accidents, ten accidents, or one fatality, as public servants and stewards of the city, they have a duty to do that. Politics aside, there is a duty related to public safety and traffic safety as that is the top complaint by residents. She wanted it to be clear that from the police department's viewpoint that this is a safety issue. Councilmember Chen said he also has a friend who received a red light camera citation in Lynnwood and was in total denial, but when they clicked on the link and saw themselves rolling through the light, they were convinced they ran the red light and their behavior changed, driving more cautiously and telling their friends about it. Councilmember Buckshnis commented she is a huge code, process and policy person and has a very good memory. She did not recall the police department bringing this to council in the past. She recalled the council discussing school zone cameras and recommending they be included in the CIP/CFP. She recognized Chief Bennett may have discussed red light cameras with Councilmember Chen, but she did not recall the council ever discussing them on the dais. If the council had, she definitely would have recommended having information brought to council early in the year followed by a very process -oriented examination. Doing it this way, the council is on the firing end, getting snowballs thrown at them. Chief Bennett agreed she did not bring it to council, she brought it to the mayor after talking with Councilmember Chen and other citizens concerned about traffic safety. The process that was discussed was to start slow and steady with school zone cameras. It was a cautious approach to try a pilot program and see how the system and vendor worked with the school zone cameras and then move into red light cameras. That was discussed with the mayor almost two years ago. Chief Bennett acknowledged what Councilmember Buckshnis was saying, but when she looks at being pelted with snowballs versus someone being hit by a car, she was interested in what could be done as soon as humanly possible to mitigate traffic accidents and potential car -pedestrian or other incidents in intersections. Command staff all do monthly ridealongs and almost every one includes an intersection Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 11 Packet Pg. 199 9.1.d traffic accident. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was not discounting the police department's experience, but she was not a kneejerk type of person. This could be presented to the new council in six months and they can hold a noticed public hearing, get information well before 2:30 p.m. and make a thoughtful decision. She suggested it was a great idea to research. She does not speed herself but knew there was a lot of speeding in areas such as Olympic View Drive. She preferred to issue tickets to people to prevent speeding. The first day she lived in Edmonds, she got a ticket which is why she never speeds. Chief Bennett recognized that changed driver behavior. Councilmember Buckshnis said she has not seen many motorcycle cops issuing tickets although she was impressed with the statistics. She wanted to move very thoughtfully with this so all the citizens are on the same page. Chief Bennett commented due to the staffing shortage, there is only one motor officer and one motor sergeant. It has been announced but no officers have expressed interest. Although it would be great to do a lot of traffic enforcement, the department simply doesn't have the staff. Commander Machado said minimum staffing is the least amount of officers that can be on duty on any given 12-hour shift/watch; the department is at or below minimum every day, below minimum means an officer working overtime to fulfill the need. Minimum staffing is significant bare bones functionality from the standpoint of responding to 911 calls. The police department never closes and will always be there, but bottom line, staffing is an issue. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was impressed with the data provided and could commiserate with staffing issues. However, as an old policy wonk, she is all about code, process and policy. Councilmember Nand thanked Chief Bennett, Judge Rivera and Court Administrator Maylor for responding to her questions. She referred to the $3.5 million revenue generated by this program in 2024 in decision package 7 which equates to 29,700 tickets/year, and requiring 2-3 additional FTEs for the court and an additional pro tem judge which would add $299,040/year. She urge councilmembers to consider whether they want to issue 29,700 tickets/year to generate an income target of $3.5million in revenue and whether the City was prepared to add additional FTEs to the court. She referred to Chief Bennett's comment that there may be a need to add a traffic cop to review red light camera footage and asked how much that would cost. Chief Bennett answered this is a pilot program and those costs are unknown until the program is instituted. If the workload was much greater than the estimated 13 hours/month or if staffing drops further, an FTE may need to be added. She reiterated the cost offset delta would cover that cost; if it is a workload issue, the revenue would cover the position. Councilmember Nand pointed out it would lessen the amount of net revenue generated for the City and wanted to ensure that was being accounted for. Councilmember Nand pointed out there are many things that can be done to address public safety on City streets including radar signs, speed bumps, etc. She thanked the police department for bringing this forward, but wanted to look at all the options and ensure there was a clear understanding of the costs associated with this program versus looking at it as a budget plug of $3.5 million. Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott observed there are a lot of accidents at the intersection of 212t'' & 76t' near Edmonds-Woodway High School which was concerning due to the number of pedestrians. He observed there would be school zone cameras in that area and asked if would make sense to see how the school zone cameras affect the data for the intersection or was having both a good idea. Chief Bennett said in her opinion both were a good idea to slow drivers in a school zone as well as not run red lights. It would be great if having school zone cameras caused people to pay more attention to their driving. Aside from revenue, the goal is to keep community members safe. The department's ideal would not to issue any tickets because everyone is paying attention, no one runs a red light and no one speeds. Unfortunately, human behavior doesn't work that way. Even in Lynnwood where cameras have existed for 10 years, that has not negated the number of red light offenders. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 12 Packet Pg. 200 9.1.d Chief Bennett continued, from a traffic and public safety standpoint and as the mother of four children who attend school, school zone cameras and red light cameras are imperative to provide safety for community members. If it just saves one life, it will be worthwhile. She reiterated the goal is no tickets, so if people are following the law, she was baffled by their fears. It is important to stop at red lights and not to speed in school zone; that is taught in drivers' ed and it is state law. According to scientific studies, every mile per hour is another percentage chance of death for a child. Any measure that can be taken to reduce the number one complaint, traffic, the City is obligated to do. 9. PUBLIC HEARING 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON INSTALLATION OF RED LIGHT CAMERAS Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott opened the public hearing. Janelle Cass, Edmonds, thanked the police department for their wonderful presentation and data. As a mom and an engineer, safety is very important to her. When she drives through Lynnwood, she has yellow light anxiety. For a long time, she would not drive in Lynnwood because although she is a confident driver, she wasn't not sure she was doing it right. As a safety professional, she asked what metrics were used, and what was the goal. She heard Chief Bennett say zero or no accidents and questioned whether that was feasible and whether policy could be established based on that. She asked whether the goal would be one accident per million cars or one in 10,000 as that is an important design factor in figuring out what the City wants to do for safety. She ran a few numbers, for the intersection of 220t' & Highway 99, it is 1.8 accidents per million cars, 220ti' & 76 is .99 accidents per million cars, 212t' & 76' is 2.28 accidents per million cars, SR 104 & 100t' is .4 accidents per million cars, and 238t' & Hwy 99 is .18 per million cars. She requested as council makes their decision to look the total picture, and come up with attainable goals, anticipating zero was unreasonable. Ken Reidy, Edmonds, said it is unfortunate the council has allowed the police department to take the legislative lead on this matter because that results in citizens who disagree with the legislation having to take a stance opposite the police department which is not something most citizens want to do. He wants to support the police department and not arguing with them over a legislative matter. This is council's role, council with the legislative authority must prepare the analysis. Council is the entity that should initiate this and should be the legislative lead on this matter. He urged the council not to pit citizens against the police department because he wants to support them. Unfortunately the presentation regarding red light cameras was not provided in advance which provided little time to digest the presentation before the public hearing. He referred to mention in the presentation of Lynnwood safety data between the years of 2012 and 2022 and that there has been significant reduction in accidents during that time. That is not the complete story, the 2017 Lynnwood automated traffic safety camera report states the number of accidents reported reflects collisions occurring within the intersection. Prior year reports included accidents occurring upon approach but not necessarily within the intersection. Lynnwood changed their reporting in 2017 so it is inaccurate to say their accident data has gone down over that time. Mr. Reidy continued, with regard to what happened last year, at the February 7, 2023 city council meeting, Councilmember Paine asked Assistant Chief Rod Sniffen if there was any intention to have Edmonds move to red light cameras and he said no, there is no plan to move to red light cameras. Councilmember Paine asked about right turn cameras and the answer was none. He asked what changed over the last eight months. Typically when a driver approaches a traffic light, it isn't yellow, it is green and drivers have to consider what to do if the light suddenly turns yellow. He recommended if the council proceeds, to install a countdown clock on the traffic signal so people approaching the intersection know when the light will turn from green to yellow. That technology exists and would do amazing things to eliminate rearend collisions caused by red light cameras. He urged the council to end consideration of this Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 13 Packet Pg. 201 9.1.d matter at this point in time. Should council want to prepare a study in the future, he urged them to follow the RCW and ensure the council is the legislative lead. Finis Tupper, Edmonds, thanked Chief Bennett for the presentation, commenting he found some of the information very interesting. It would have been nicer to have the information available a few days before the meeting, but that seems to be the modius operandi on this subject, sandbag the public and not provide information. He quoted from page 17 of the approved minutes of February 7, 2023 council meeting where all councilmembers, Mayor Nelson and City Attorney Jeff Taraday were present, "In response to audience comment, Councilmember Paine asked if there was any intent to have Edmonds install red light cameras. Assistant Chief Sniffen answered there is no plan to install red light cameras in this program. Councilmember Paine asked if there were plans to install right hand turn cameras. Assistant Chief Sniffen answered there was not." RCW 46.73.170 is very clear and he suggested the council review Resolution 1514 passed on February 21, 2023 which states Whereas the statute authorizes the use of automated traffic safety cameras by local jurisdictions in among other areas school speed zones, school walk areas, provided that before enacting an ordinance or allowing for the use of such cameras, the appropriate local legislative authority first prepares an analysis of the location within the jurisdiction where automated traffic safety cameras are proposed to be located. The February 7 and 21, 2023 agendas do not include that traffic study; it was never provided to the public and similar to what is going on now, the police department has not provided any traffic analysis. He assumed the only reason the red light cameras are being proposed is because there is a humpty dumpty budget, a $3.5 million deficit, that needs to be fixed and he recommended not fixing the budget this way. Deborah Arthur, Edmonds, said she has a lot of respect for the Edmonds Police Department and appreciated Chief Bennett's presentation. She accidentally drove through a red light camera in the past and due to a car tailgating, had to make a decision whether to go through on the yellow or stop and get rearended. She drove through on the yellow, got a red light camera ticket and paid the ticket after seeing the video. A Wikipedia article described Finland's practice of basing ticket amounts on income and one executive's ticket amount was two weeks' salary. She was not proposing that. From what she has heard tonight, the red light cameras seem like a good idea because she believed in deterrents. She has seen drivers run stop signs and red lights throughout Edmonds. The police department would not propose this if they didn't think it was necessary. She hoped the council would decide to implement red light cameras. She disagreed with Councilmember Nand's comment that people wouldn't shop in Edmonds if there were red light cameras. With no further public comment, Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott closed the public hearing. 10. COUNCIL BUSINESS - CONTINUED 1. PROPOSED 2024-2029 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Councilmember Teitzel referred to PWT-50, Walkway on 238' St. SW from Highway 99 to 76' Ave W, which is on the CIP/CFP to begin in the 2030-2044 timeframe. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO MOVE THE SCHEDULE UP FOR DESIGN TO BEGIN 2026 WITH CONSTRUCTION TO BEGIN IN 2027. SECOND Councilmember Teitzel relayed the estimated project cost is $1.4 million. It is scheduled for the 2030- 2044 timeframe, but ranked #10 in the long walkway priority list in the most recent transportation plan. The Highway 99 Subarea is undergoing rapid redevelopment. This route is one of the primary walking and biking routes for residents of southeast Edmonds to transit and amenities on SR 99. It is a major Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 14 Packet Pg. 202 9.1.d walking and biking route to the soon to be improved Mathay Ballinger Park and will be a major walking and biking route to the new Edmonds access to the Ballinger Park. It is a dangerous walking route with insufficient or non-existent sidewalks currently and it needs to be reprioritized for design in 2026 and construction in 2027. COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, MOVE TO AMEND TO MOVE THE PROJECT TO 2027 FOR DESIGN AND 2028 FOR CONSTRUCTION. Council President Pro Tem Olson explained projects are included in the first three years of the CIP/CFP if they have designated funding sources. Knowing there is no funding source for that project at this time, she recommended moving it into the unfunded portion of the plan with the understanding if a funding source is identified, the CIP/CFP could be amended to move it up. City Engineer Rob English commented that would be consistent with the practice of putting unfunded projects in the back 3 years of the CIP/CFP. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION CARRIED (5-2) MAYOR PRO TEM TIBBOTT, COUNCIL PRESIDENT PRO TEM OLSON, AND COUNCILMEMBERS BUCKSHNIS, PAINE AND NAND VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS TEITZEL AND CHEN VOTING NO. Councilmember Buckshnis said she was confused by the process; the council already voted on amendments in the packet that she and Councilmember Teitzel proposed. Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott advised was this a new amendment to CIP/CFP, a motion was made by Councilmember Teitzel and amended by Council President Pro Tem Olson and now the council will vote on the main motion as amended. Councilmember Teitzel recalled discussions by Public Works Director Oscar Antillon and City Attorney Jeff Taraday regarding the code related to sidewalks which states the property owner adjacent to the right- of-way where sidewalk is installed may bear some of that cost. If the intent is for design in 2027, the property owners need to be clear what the code requires. He suggested that be sussed out in the next three years Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott observed this is an important connector to the Interurban Trail as well as the future light rail station. He asked if there were grant funding opportunities to complete that project sooner rather than later. Mr. Antillon answered sidewalks are typically built by the developer during construction and turned over to the property owner. The current code does not prevent the City from building sidewalks, but they are not the City's responsibility. Staff will ensure projects comply with the code and will continue to look for grants and other opportunities to fund this and other projects. The City does not have a grants manager that does that but engineering staff, particularly Transportation Engineer Bertrand Hauss, continuously search for opportunities. Mr. English said the state's bike and pedestrian program as well as Safe Routes to School are potential funding sources for this and other sidewalk projects. A new program, the Active Infrastructure Program, is another potential funding source, but they have not done a call for projects yet. The challenge will be how competitive that project or another sidewalk project in the City will be in a nationwide program. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if the council would receive a summary of projects the council has voted on or should councilmembers continue to propose amendments. Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott referred to packet page 353 which is a list of public works and parks amendments and the action/change. Councilmember Buckshnis observed the packet did not reflect her motion to remove the waterfront walkway project. Councilmember Teitzel recalled the motion failed for lack of a second. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 15 Packet Pg. 203 9.1.d COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL, TO REJECT THE $500,000 COST IN PWP-02 TO COMPLETE AND CLOSE OUT ALL ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CARBON RECOVERY PROJECT. Councilmember Buckshnis explained this was supposed to be an all-inclusive project. The council has not had an update for a long time other than it is now working. There have been issues with whoever is doing the construction and it was supposed to be all-inclusive so she questioned why the City would bear $500,000 more to close out the project. She asked if this should be discussed in executive session since it was an all-inclusive contract. Mr. Antillon agreed it could be discussed in executive session. Mr. Taraday suggested scheduling an executive session at a subsequent meeting to allow him to confer with staff to ensure the topic was proper for an executive session. COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS WITHDREW THE MOTION WITH THE AGREEMENT OF THE SECOND. Mayor Pro Tern Tibbott requested staff update the list of amendments. He expected the CIP/CFP would be brought back to council at the next meeting for approval. Councilmember Teitzel recalled during the council's last discussion regarding the CIP/CFP, funding sources for Yost Park projects including R19 were moved around. He asked if council needed to make an amendment or would staff restate the costs and resubmit them for council consideration. Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director Angie Feser displayed the following which is a result of past discussions/presentations: • Parks CIP/CFP Amendments as of 11/8/2023 CW Project Site & Description 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 6-Year Total Shell Creek Restoration �ARBYFORIYAR0. R39 Stream health and erosion control of shell Creek in Yost Park, scope TBD based 5 120,1e $ 380,000 S - S - S - $ - S 610,000 on study-3twly existing condition analysis in 2024- Design, permitting and S 250,000 construction work in 2025. R8 Yost Park & Pool R4 Park enhancements, repair and maintenance to include c �154,99 5 1,296,400 S S S $ S 1,296,400 R6 R31 playground and pool upgrades in 2025. Olympic Beach Park 2fle.e R7 - Replacement of failed ventilation system in 5 20,000 5 33,900 5 - 5 - S - S 53 000 coordination with roof replacement (by Facilities/PW) S 33,000 Elm Street Park D36 Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, 1 5 100,000 5 340,370 R14 small shelter with picnic tables and habitat restoration, and consideration of a dog park amenity with public design process. Councilmember Teitzel asked if this was sufficient to document how the costs were moved rather than revising R10, R9 and R4. Ms. Feser answered these change will be reflected in the CIP/CFP that will be presented to council for adoption. Mayor Pro Tern Tibbott declared a brief recess 2. COUNCIL BUDGET DISCUSSION Mayor Pro Tern Tibbott suggested the following approach: councilmembers first focus on decision packages in the proposed budget and at a future meeting, cover decision packages in outlying years and new decision packages proposed by councilmembers. Councilmember Teitzel referred to DP7, red light cameras. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO DENY DECISION PACKAGE 7, RED LIGHT CAMERAS, AT THIS TIME AND RECONSIDER IN 2024. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 16 Packet Pg. 204 9.1.d Councilmember Teitzel provided the following justification for his motion: installation of red light cameras purportedly results in a reduction of accidents at busy intersections. However, supporting data shows conflicting results in this regard. In fact, the Redond City Council recently voted to remove all red light cameras that had previously been installed there because the safety benefits were not clear. More research is needed to justify installation of red light cameras in Edmonds to clearly demonstrate the safety benefits. In addition, this DP does not identify additional costs that will result from the addition of personnel in EPD and the Court to process the citations and resultant appeals. Until that research and quantification is completed, this DP should be denied. After all empirical evidence and quantification of revenue and expenses can be quantified (including identification of additional EPD and Court FTEs required to process the citations), this proposal should be reintroduced in 2024 for Council consideration. Council President Pro Tem Olson commented the council got really good food for thought and some of the items mentioned in the narrative for this decision package that were addressed in tonight's presentation are not necessarily her concerns. There is more information for the council to vet and to give more time and consideration to public safety concerns. However, it is not appropriate for the council to include it as a decision for revenue in the short term and she agreed with Councilmember Teitzel's desire to consider it outside that process next year. Councilmember Paine argued against this amendment to remove DP7. Red light cameras and school zone cameras offer a lot of public safety. The council has heard from over a dozen neighborhood that traffic safety is a neighborhood need right now and red light cameras offer immediate results for those neighborhoods. Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott expressed appreciation for the amount of information the police department provided tonight. It raised a number of questions in his mind that still have not been answered so it is difficult for him to support moving forward with the red light cameras at this time. However, it peaked his interest and he was interested in pursuing it in 2024 when the council has time for more deliberation on the topic. In response to Councilmember Paine's comment, Councilmember Teitzel advised the motion had nothing to do with school zone cameras and those should proceed. This decision package pertained only to red light cameras. Councilmember Chen relayed the police department's presentation indicated the motive is public safety. The council has received many complaints from residents about driving behavior including running red lights and he has witnessed many near misses in front of his office on 76th & 224t1i at the one-way stop sign that was replaced with a flashing red light that drivers continue to run. This is a public safety improvement approach. He was skeptical three intersections will generate $3.5 million in revenue, but in principle, he can accept that it is related to safety concerns. Councilmember Paine reiterated over a dozen neighborhoods have expressed concern. Red light cameras would release police from the responsibility for traffic enforcement at intersections and allow them to do traffic enforcement in the more than a dozen neighborhoods the council has heard from. She urged councilmembers not to support the amendment. Councilmember Buckshnis asked if Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott was allowing only two comments per councilmember. Mayor Pro Tem Tibbott answered that sounded like a good idea. Councilmember Buckshnis said Roberts Rules allows two comments per councilmember, but does not restrict questions. Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 17 Packet Pg. 205 9.1.d Councilmember Buckshnis expressed her total support for this amendment. As she has stated previously, this is policy driven issue and should start with the council, have a slow roll out with a public hearing at the planning board, and a complete process. Councilmember Nand expressed support for the amendment, commenting it would be quite significant if the City began issuing 29,700 tickets/year through red light cameras which, according to her calculation, would be required to reach $3.5 million in revenue. She found it bizarre at a time the City is facing a budget crisis to consider adding FTEs to serve this program when there are vital services that needed to be funded and the council may have to contemplate eliminate positions in 2024 and beyond. She summarized red light cameras would be the wrong move for the City at this time. MOTION CARRIED (5-2), COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN AND PAINE VOTING NO. Councilmember Teitzel referred to DP8, grant specialist, relaying he is very torn on this position because he sees a very clear benefit. However, there are very unusual circumstance related to the budget and strong actions will be required to get it under control. COUNCILMEMBER TEITZEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO DENY DECISION PACKAGE 8 FOR THE GRANT SPECIALIST, BUT RECONSIDER IT NEXT YEAR ESPECIALLY IF FEDERAL GRANT MONEY BECOMES AVAILABLE FOR THIS SORT OF WORK. Councilmember Teitzel provided the following justification for his motion: This FTE is purported to be able to bring in an incremental amount of grant funding that would more than offset the annual cost of the position (benefits and salaries). While this position is worthy of consideration, this DP should be denied at this time. The city's financial condition is currently uncertain, and adding an FTE adds significant expenditure with an uncertain return. This request should be reevaluated in mid-2024 and brought forward as a mid -year budget amendment for consideration after the city's actual 2024 financial condition becomes more clear. Council President Pro Tem Olson expressed support for the motion, noting she has ruminated about this a lot. She was open to a short term contract because infrastructure money and the Inflation Reduction Act money is available now, there are a lot of requirements and possibly a specialist could get the City more of that money. However, for the City to take on a reoccurring and forever FTE, according to what she has read, there won't be as grants available once those pots are depleted. Staff will also continue to look for grants. She preferred a professional services approach where someone looks for grants for the City although she noted some of the departments' professional services budget may be reduced via the budget process. She expressed support for eliminating the FTE in the budget, anticipating the need will decrease in future years as funds are no longer available. Councilmember Paine argued against eliminating this position. What some may not understand is grants include administrative fees to support a grant writer. For example, a $200,000 grant would help support the $120,000 salary for a grants manager as well as the position's overhead, 10% is a common amount. Eliminating this position is shortsighted as it is a way to have projects developed and moved forward in ways that serve the City. She did not understand the proposal to eliminate this position other than putting the City into a situation that was very shortsighted. Nonprofits and other cities have grant managers. She feared not having a grants manager would result in City projects not moving forward. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed support for the motion. She has read over 250 grants over the last 8 years and assured a grant writer is as important as the people they work with to get sufficient information. She is a fiscal conservative and did not believe this was short sighted. Eliminating this position is being smart, and the most important thing is for the new administration and new councilmembers to have a Edmonds City Council Approved Minutes November 14, 2023 Page 18 Packet Pg. 206 9.1.e Councilmember Dotsch commented she saw something recently about Porchfest and asked about the cost. Ms. McLaughlin answered the intent was to empower residents to do things on their own; Porchfest is an example of how that is working. Councilmember Dotsch asked about the budget for Porchfest. Ms. McLauglin answered there is no funding in 2024 for Porchfest; she believed a nonprofit organization had been formed and it was not City supported except get it to where they are which is very exciting. Councilmember Eck commented whenever that many people come to the City core for 4t1i of July, Porchfest, etc., it increases revenue and results in repeat customers. She asked whether Ms. McLaughlin or Mr. Tatum have considered what that looks like. Ms. McLaughlin answered they have had conversations with downtown retailers relative to those events and the anecdotal answer is yes, it those events boost business. One of the exciting things that came out of reimaging is leveraging those events to advertise other City events. For example, bringing hundreds of people out for a comprehensive plan conversation typically does not happen, but combining that with a music festival or an exciting public event leverages the money that would have been spent on a basic public open house that a fraction of the people would have attended. It is a great way to get money to go further. Councilmember Eck commented she knew of a number of people who made a day of those events with brunch, dinner, shopping. She agreed those events inspire that type of behavior. Councilmember Nand commented as a former Edmonds Chamber of Commerce board member, the City is not responsible for the 4t1i of July, that is put on by the Chamber, although the City helps subsidize it by providing security. There have been issues in the past where the Chamber feels the City takes credit for their events, using their images without permission, etc. For the public's edification, she wanted to clarify the 4' of July is funded by the nonprofit Chamber and has no General Fund impact other than subsidizing it via a police presence to manage crowds. Mayor Rosen declared a brief recess. 10. PRESENTATION 1. RED LIGHT CAMERA PRESENTATION Mayor Rosen reminded this is intended to be a presentation and discussion only, no action will be taken tonight. Police Chief Michelle Bennett explained they were asked to return with more data about red light cameras. Data for 2023 was received two days ago which will be included in this presentation. She reviewed: My Edmonds News o From hiring challenges to Hwy 99 to homelessness, new police chief addresses community questions o Posted: November 22, 2021 o Chief Bennett made it clear that she would like to see traffic cameras at every school crossing; in fact, "I would make all traffic infractions covered by cameras." Traffic issues, she added, are the number -one complaint the city gets. Fair warning. — By Bob Throndsen Using cameras for traffic -related citations tends to lead to less conflict between officers/police department and drivers because a camera states evidence that is hard to argue with versus discretionary decision making by officers which can often lead to anger, disruption and poor relations with the police department Comparable Data o The intersections suggested are the highest volume intersection related accidents in the city. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 19 Packet Pg. 207 9.1.e o Lynnwood, Kent, Lake Forest Park, Renton, Sea-Tac, Seattle have these, and many other agencies (Everett, Bothell) are also looking at them. o The City of Lynnwood is a relevant comparable city. 2022 Annual Automated Traffic Safety Camera Report X Lynnwood Police Department Per RCW 46.63.170 cities using automated traffic safety cameras must post an annual report of the number of traffic accidents that occurred at each location where an automated traffic safety camera is located, as well as the number of notices of infraction issued for each camera on the Ciy's website. The below data comprises the number of accidents and citations issued at each respective intersection and sch0ot zone where traffic safety cameras are deployed. Intersection Number of Citations 'Numberof Accidents 36a 1 196th St S.W. 6,070 3 4411 / Ald. Mall Blvd. 3,514 8 " 44- / 196r" St S.W. 0 - Under Construction. 6 1841h I Aid. Mall Pkwy 4,728 6 1961° / Aid. Mall Pkwy 14,163 2 Maple / Md. Mall Pkwy 1,900 3 1;" J Hwy 99 2,834 5 1 -1/ 0°sts.W. 5,063 8 " Hwy 99 / 200- St S.W. 1,164 3 School Zone Numberof Citations Numberof Accidents 18200 -18800 BLK 44th Ave West 4,175 1 5500 - 6600 BILK 168th St S.W. 2,660 4 -number or "moena repor—i renea wnisions oaurring wnnm me mcersemon. Lynnwood Cameras: Red Light Camera Accident Reductions - Cameras went live in 2011 ■ 2022 44 Lynnwood Red Light Camera Collisions ■ 2021 36 ■ 2020 29 ■ 2019 11 w ■ 2018 14 „o ■ 2017 20 ■ 2016 80 ■ 2015 92 ■ 2014 83 ■ 2013 111 / ■ 2012 161 ,a • Didn't some cities do away with red light cameras: o Called Kent Police Chief Padilla, `Heck no, they are very effective for the city, we are actually adding six more. Also funded our body worn camera program.' When asked if rear -end collisions increased, he stated that they have actually gone down. o Kenmore is adding two cameras this year. o Auburn: Researching their website yesterday, led me to their links about photo enforcement... Reinstating cameras: March 22nd , 2022, adding 6-12 cameras. o Communicated with Redmond Police Lieutenant Julie Beard and Chief Darrell Lowe, ` We had them in around 2012 for several months, Microsoft lobbied hard (with company attorneys assisting) against them. We've been talking about putting them back.' o Communication sent to Chief Ted Boe of Burien PD. Chief Boe said they have `not had them in at least six years, speculated reason for removal was labor based, lowest staffed city and most calls per service in King County; no new officers in 12 years. No traffic cars or motor officers are assigned to the city. We have 26 cops to handle 21,000 calls per year. • Accidents and Safety o Edmonds Proposed Pilot Red -Light Camera Program: Collision Data ■ Data for accidents in Edmonds intersections was collected from 2020-2022. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 20 Packet Pg. 208 9.1.e ■ An analysis of collision data was conducted, in addition to gathering input from the officers who investigate many of these collisions. ■ Also considered were officer's observations of high pedestrian areas as well as areas of common citizen complaints. o Accidents: Three Years of Data (2020-2022) Potential Red -Light Camera Intersections (A formula was used to analyze potential intersections based on high traffic volumes and high numbers of accidents.) ■ Highway 99 - Total: 39 accidents - Highway 99, (11* intersection verified) - Average Daily Traffic: 6,000-20,000 cars *there is a percentage of intersection related accidents miscategorized, up to 75% o Six Potential Highway 99 Red -Light Camera Intersections ■ 224th and Highway 99: 12 Accidents, 16,000 cars per day ■ 220th and Highway 99: 11 Accidents, 20,000 cars per day ■ 238th and Highway 99: Five Accidents, 20,000 cars per day ■ 216th and Highway 99: Five Accidents, 20,000 cars per day ■ 228th and Highway 99: Three Accidents, 16,000 cars per day ■ 212th and Highway 99: Two Accidents, 20,000 cars per day o Additional High Accident and Car Volume Intersections (Non -Highway 99) ■ 220th and 76th: 13 Accidents, 12,000 cars per day ■ 212th and 76th: 15 Accidents, 6000 cars per day ■ Highway 104 and 100th: 6 Accidents, 13,000 cars per day Comparison of Daily Intersection Traffic Volumes (high to low) o Verra Mobility Rating (high to low) ■ Column L on spreadsheet represents the number of daily projected violations for that specific movement (based on the running of their algorithm). ■ If all 9 were installed, the total would be 50.4 total per day based on Verra Mobility's algorithm. 50.4 x 30 = 1,512, x 31 = 1,562 violations per month o Highest Rating per Verra Mobility (combined with accidents and Average Per Day Car Volume) ■ 220th and Highway 99: Verra Rating- 5.3 (10 accidents) 20,000 cars per day ■ 238th and Highway 99, Southbound: Verra Rating- 4.72 (five accidents) 20,000 cars ■ 228th and Highway 99: Verra Rating- 4.05 (three accidents) 16,000 cars ■ 212th and 76th Northbound: Verra Rating- 4.08 (15 accidents) 6000 cars ■ 212th and 76th Westbound Verra Rating- 4.06 (15 accidents) 6000 cars ■ 212th and 76th Eastbound Verra Rating- 3.99 (15 accidents) 6000 cars ■ 238th and Highway 99 Northbound: Verra Rating- 3.91 (five accidents) 16,000 cars ■ SR 99 and 216th : Verra Rating- 3.68 (five accidents) 20,000 cars ■ Hwy 104 and 100th Southbound: Verra Rating- 3.5 (six accidents) 13,000 cars ■ Hwy 104 and 100th Northbound: Verra Rating- 3.42 (six accidents) 13,000 cars ■ SR 99 and 224th : Verra Rating- 3.41 (12 accidents) 16,000 cars ■ Hwy 104 and 100th Westbound: Verra Rating- 3.19 (six accidents) 13,000 cars ■ SR 99 and 212th Verra Rating- 3.1 (two accidents) 20,000 cars Pedestrian accidents are another potential danger of intersection related crashes o Analysis from 2020-2022 ■ 220th and HWY 99 = 1 ■ 212th and 76th = 2 ■ SR 104 and 100th = 0 (Recently a homicide at the light at Hwy 104 and the 8800 block, (12 blocks away) Intersection related near pedestrian crash. Academic and Empirical Research o Empirical Research Says: Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 21 Packet Pg. 209 9.1.e 9 ■ Road crashes are a prime cause of death and disability, and red- light running is a common cause of crashes at signalized intersections. - Red-light cameras are increasingly used to promote compliance with traffic signals. 13 Manual enforcement methods are resource intensive and high risk, whereas red- light cameras can operate 24 hours a day and do not involve high-speed pursuits. ■ More than one million crashes occur annually at traffic signals in the United States, and red-light cameras increasingly are being used to supplement police -enforcement efforts by automatically photographing vehicles whose drivers run red lights. ■ Red-light running at signalized intersections is a significant crashes and approximately 1,000 deaths per year. - Red -light -camera systems aimed at reducing this problem have become a popular tool in local jurisdictions. Recent Article in My Edmonds News: ■ In Washington state, traffic fatalities were up 38% last year compared with 2019, reaching a 30-year high. In response, the state is considering expanding its limited speed camera use. State officials plan a visit to Finland next month to see how that country used automated enforcement to reduce traffic deaths. ■ "Law enforcement has really stepped back from enforcing traffic laws," said Jonathan Adkins, CEO of the Governors Highway Safety Association. "We have to get police back out there and get support for police back. But this has to be done the right way, and it has to be done fairly. And we do want to look at technology — cameras don't see race, they don't see gender." ■ Two Pedestrians Struck in Perrinville Neighborhood Sunday Empirical Studies related to Red Light Cameras (Academically based) ■ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine ■ Insurance Institute for Highway Safety ■ Safety Evaluation of Red -Light Cameras, Federal Highway Administration ■ National Library of Medicine ■ Journal of Safety Research ■ National Academies - National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine - American scientific academy - The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, also known as the National Academies, is a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national nationalacademies.org - Founder Federal Government of the United States - Headquarters Keck Center • 500 5th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001 - Subsidiaries National Academy of Sciences (NAS) • National Academy of Engineering (NAE) National Academy of Medicine (NAM) - Legal status Congressionally Chartered Nonprofit Organization - Purpose Provide independent, objective advice to inform policy with evidence, spark progress and innovation, and confront challenging issues for the benefit of society. - Location Executive Office National Academy of Sciences Building 2101 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20418, United States - Membership Scientists, engineers, and health professionals - The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine - (NASEM), also known as the National Academies, is a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United Statesl. These esteemed institutions provide independent, objective advice to inform policy decisions, ignite progress and innovation, and address complex challenges for the betterment of society2. - National Academy of Sciences (NAS): Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 22 Packet Pg. 210 9.1.e o Reference in presentation to numerous studies/research o Governor's Highway Safety Association www.ghsa.org @GHSAHQ ■ Pedestrian 2021 PRELIMINARY DATA (January - December) - Automated traffic enforcement (particularly speed enforcement), while controversial, has irrefutably led to reductions in motorist speeds and crashes. A literature review of studies evaluating speed cameras concluded that all studies measuring speed or speeding saw reductions when the cameras were present. 31. Cecilia, W., Charlene, W., Joan, H. K., Le Brocque, R., & Bellamy, N. (2010, November 10). Speed cameras for the prevention of road traffic injuries and deaths. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CDO04607.pub4 32 Sep 9, 2022 — The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) just released the numbers of pedestrian deaths of 2021, and it has hit a 20-year high. o Pedestrian Fatalities on the Rise in Washington State o Washington State sees a high number of pedestrian fatalities on its roads every year. Even though lawmakers have enacted measures to reduce traffic- related deaths, our numbers have continued to claim. Pedestrians continue to be vulnerable road users, with nothing to protect them from the force of a colliding vehicle How Many Pedestrian Fatalities are There in Washington? o More than 100 pedestrians are killed by motorists every year in Washington State. o However, that does not paint the full picture of the hundreds of additional pedestrians who are struck and seriously injured on our roads. Not to mention, the lives of families and friends impacted by each victim. City researched red light cameras in 2008 o September 19 2008, Everett Herald reported Edmonds approved trial run of red light cameras at Highway 99 & 200', Highway 99 & 238t' St SW and Edmonds Way & 100t' Ave W 2023 data o 2023 Collision Results Month of Year Total Collisions Fatal Collisions Injury Collisions Number of Fatalities Number of Injuries January 48 0 6 0 6 February 45 0 12 0 14 March 43 0 6 0 6 April 43 0 8 0 8 May 49 0 7 0 10 June 52 0 16 0 18 July 41 0 10 0 14 August 51 0 13 0 18 September 55 0 12 0 15 October 49 0 13 0 15 November 41 0 12 0 13 December 44 0 1 5 0 5 Report Totals: 561 0 1 120 0 1 142 o Heat map of accidents: 2023 CC 0 ,4 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 23 Packet Pg. 211 9.1.e o Total accidents by day of the week: 2023 Day of the Week Total Collisions Fatal Collisions In)ury Collisions Number of Fatalities Number of Injuries MONDAY 86 0 19 0 23 TUESDAY 79 0 18 0 22 WEDNESDAY 83 0 11 0 11 THURSDAY 74 0 16 0 20 FRIDAY 103 0 22 0 24 IT DAY 77 0 18 0 21 SUNDAY 59 0 16 0 21 Report Totals: 1 561 0 1 120 1 0 1 242 o 2023 Pedestrian Accidents 1 1 2 3 Total Parking Lots 3 1 4 8 HWY99 0 2 1 3 HWY 104 1 0 0 1 HWY524 0 2 0 2 Downtown 1 0 4 5 Other 1 3 10 14 Total 6 8 19 o 2023 Vehicle vs. Pedestrian accidents 35 30 25 20 1s 10 0 2018 2019 2020 2021 I022 2023 o Intersection related collisions total and location ■ Total of 204 collisions occurred in intersections in 2023. Many intersections that had multiple collisions, but some of the more prevalent locations are as follows: ■ Locations highlighted in red are controlled by traffic signals; locations highlighted in gray are controlled by stop signs (in at least one direction). Further discussion with the City's traffic engineer will be needed to identify if there is an engineering adjustment that can be made for these locations. However, one adjustment that can be made for these locations in red is the implementation of red light cameras. Traffic Sergeant Recommendation o The implementation of red light cameras at specific locations would also help decrease the number of collisions in Edmonds. In addition to decreasing collisions, the cameras would decrease the risky behavior that results in collisions, even in locations where ethe number of collisions is relatively low. The Edmonds PD Traffic Unit will continue working with other Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 24 Packet Pg. 212 9.1.e members of the City as well as the Snohomish County Target Zero Task Force to promote vehicle and pedestrian safety. - Sergeant Kraig Strum #2833 Are the costs of the camera offset or will they cost the city additional money? o Verra charges $5000 per camera per month ■ Seven cameras would be $35,000 total per month o Court costs: Monthly 2475 tickets=$17,859 + $5000 (est. cost $24,900 per month) 2475 tickets a month would be 82.5 a day-- 11 per camera, per day. o Court costs: Monthly 1680 tickets $16,722 + $5000 (est. cost $21,700 per month) 1680 tickets per month would be 56 tickets a day-- 8 per camera, per day. o Police costs are currently neutral 0 2,475 tickets per month x $130 average fine = $321,000 ■ $24,900 costs - $262,000 delta in the positive per month - (A year: $3,144,000) 0 1680 tickets per month x $130 average fine=$262,000 ■ $21,700 costs - $229,300 delta in the positive - (A year: $2,751,600) What is the impact related to court costs? o In Lynnwood Municipal Court, 18.5% of people who received parking citations in 2022 requested a hearing. ■ Individuals who request a hearing may choose whether to appear in -person or remotely. ■ IRLJ 2.6 requires that hearings be set within 120 days from the date of the notice of infraction. o Edmonds Municipal Court currently conducts pro se infractions hearings on the second and fourth Fridays of the month. ■ These hearings take place from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. ■ Current calendars allow for 80 pro se infraction hearings per month. ■ Typically, ten infraction hearings are scheduled per hour, which provides an average of six minutes per hearing. o Workload impact assuming (1) 2,475 red light citations per month; and (2) 1,680 red light citations per month. o Assuming 2,475 red light citations each month with 18.5% of individuals cited requesting a hearing, this will result in an additional 458 infraction hearings per month. ■ This is a 572% increase in the number of infraction hearings that Edmonds Municipal Court conducts each month. o The increase in hearings would require Edmonds Municipal Court to move from infractions being held on two days per month to 13.5 days per month. o Assuming 2,475 citations per month, Edmonds Municipal Court estimates require an additional two to three FTEs. ■ The annual salary of a Court Clerk at Step One is $65,184. Including benefits, the total annual cost for one Court Clerk is $84,739. - This would result in a monthly cost per Court Clerk of $7,061. - If two additional Court Clerks were needed, the monthly cost would be $14,122. - If three additional Court Clerks were needed, the monthly cost would be $21,183. ■ Additional capacity could be created by increasing the pro tempore judge additional calendars. - This would result in an estimated additional cost of $3,737 per month. o Assuming 2,475 citations per month, Edmonds Municipal Court estimates that its increased monthly costs would be between $17,859 and $24,920 Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 25 Packet Pg. 213 9.1.e o Assuming a total of 1,680 citations per month with 18.5% of individuals cited requesting a hearing, this will result in an additional 311 infraction hearings per month. ■ This is a 389% increase in the number of infractions hearings that Edmonds Municipal Court conducts each month. o The increase in hearings would require Edmonds Municipal Court to move from infractions hearings being held two days per month to 10 days per month. o Additional capacity could be created by increasing the pro tempore judge budget and bringing in an additional judicial officer to preside over additional calendars. This would result in an estimated additional cost of $2,600 per month. o Assuming 1,680 citations per month, Edmonds Municipal Court estimates that the increased Court Clerk workload from red light cameras would require an additional 2 FTEs. Edmonds Municipal Court estimates that its increased monthly costs would be $16,722. What are the impact to Police? o Conservatively, based on conversations with Lynnwood PD, it takes approximately one minute to view three tickets. o In speaking with the Edmonds traffic sergeant, this workload would be split up among multiple officers, thereby minimizing the workload and staying current with the volume. o The infraction that sent to the violator includes a picture of the violation, the steps on how to respond to the infraction and hyperlink to view a video of the violation online. ■ The steps on how to respond to the infraction are decided upon by the court. ■ There is a boiler plate narrative from police on each ticket. 0 2,475 tickets per month, divided by 3 tickets a minute, is 825 minutes a month (or 13.75 hours a month). 0 1680 tickets per month, divided by 3 tickets a minute, is 560 minutes a month (or 9.3 hours a month) ■ Traffic Unit indicates 9.3 hours/month is doable within their current work shifts or by offices on light duty Options and Recommendations — Three Potential Recommendations o Option 1 1. 220th and Highway 99: 5.3 (10 accidents) 20,000 cars per day ■ One approach 2. 212th and 76th: 4.08 (15 accidents) 6000 cars per day ■ Three approaches 3. Hwy 104 and 100th: 3.5 (six accidents) 13,000 cars per day ■ Three approaches, Three Intersections 1,680 potential citations o Option 2 ■ Install cameras at 6 Highway 99 intersections and 3 additional high accident intersections, 9 intersections total 1. 224th and Highway 99: 12 Accidents, 16,000 cars per day 2. 220th and Highway 99: 11 Accidents, 20,000 cars per day 3. 238th and Highway 99: Five Accidents, 20,000 cars per day 4. 216th and Highway 99: Five Accidents, 20,000 cars per day 5. 228th and Highway 99: Three Accidents, 16,000 cars per day 6. 212th and Highway 99: Two Accidents, 20,000 cars per day 7. 220th and 76th: 13 Accidents, 12,000 cars per day 8. 212th and 76th: 15 Accidents, 6000 cars per day 9. Highway 104 and 100th: Six Accidents, 13,000 cars per day ■ Nine Intersections 2,475 potential citations o Option 3 ■ Install red-light cameras at three Highway 99 intersections and three non -Highway 99 intersections. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 26 Packet Pg. 214 9.1.e ■ Six intersections: 2,077 potential citations Red Light Cameras Proposal o The proposed red-light camera enforcement systems (assuming approval and agreement modification) will take several months into 2024 to engineer, install, and incorporate into the eco-system we are currently designing for school zone cameras. o For 2024, best case scenario is having cameras operational by July, so for the remaining six months of the year they would be functional. o For 2025 and beyond, they would be operational year-round. There is a 30-day warning period. o The proposal is to install red light cameras at determined high accident risk intersections. Assistant Chief Rod Sniffen addressed traffic engineering, explaining Verra Mobility did most the analysis for the school zone cameras; they have many systems operating in Washington State and are very familiar with the RCW and its requirements. They use algorithms and publicly available traffic data to predict what will happen from their systems and make recommendations. That is what was used for installation of the City's five school zone cameras. The algorithms they use are based on similar systems and traffic counts in the area. When he and Traffic Engineer Bertrand Hauss looked at the data, they found Verra was using outdated data that wasn't very accurate and they provided them better traffic counts for many of the locations to assist Verra's analysis. That analysis satisfies the analysis required by state law before the legislative body can enact these legislative programs. Assistant Chief Sniffen continued, Verra takes publicly available data that is published either by the city, state or DOT and their staff gather snapshot in time information using tube counters or sophisticated radar equipment to count cars on the street. That information is used in calculations to predict the number of violations, the flow of cars, etc. Using that data, Verra came up with a number that makes it cost neutral for the jurisdiction to put in red light cameras. If the numbers as a result of their analysis find there is not enough activity to warrant cameras, Verra will not recommend installation of cameras in that location because it will not be cost neutral. Chief Bennett advised Verra will not recommend installation of cameras at an intersection if it does not meet the algorithm in Column L of their analysis which is typically 3 or above before they recommend installation of a camera. The nine locations in Option 2 all have an algorithm above 3. Chief Bennett continued her presentation: • Economic and Geographic Diversity in Edmonds o Economic and Geographic Differences in camera placement ■ Camera violations do not distinguish gender, economic status, race, etc. ■ Most Highway 99 traffic is through traffic travelling through the city to other destinations. ■ Highway 104 and 104th would potentially capture those heading to the ferry or living in the Edmonds Bowl. ■ 212th/220th and 76th captures a more residential area of Edmonds and high school traffic. o Economic Diversity in Edmonds Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 27 Packet Pg. 215 9.1.e Income by Location RACUCTXMI(ITY Total MIGNEW MEDIAN MOUSEMOID INCOME nolr U L Census Tract 506 z Census Tract 503 3. Census Tract 502 In 2021, the place with the highest Median Household Income (Total) in Edmonds, WA was Census Tract 506 with a value of $191,250, followed by Census Tract 503 and Census Tract 50Z with respective values of $152,613 and $131.136 The following map shows all of the places in Edmonds, WA colored by their Median Household Income ITotall. Data 1— ��+ Save image Sh_c/C—d Add Dala to Can 5 Openstreewap can--, 0 CAWO Ned- 1- Wd iMa S4091, S69.8k S699k S92.2k 0 592 A S124k081251, 819W0$191k- 2013 2014 2015 2016 201) 2018 2019 2020 —1 Assistant Chief Sniffen added with the school zone speed camera enforcement, the court was adamant that there be methodologies for people who have an inability to pay and those are listed on the citation. There are several options on the citation for violators to petition the court, have hearings and mitigate the cost of the violation. • Citation Information wnat does me otiender aet mine maiir o What the offender sees when they click on the hyperlink Info �~ ADDITIONAL RESOURCES LTNNWOOD City of Lynnwood, WA REVIEW EVIDENCE MEMO ..._..rr •— w. r..w w.0 Need to talk to wineone2 30 help by phone. • School Zones in the City o The schools highlighted in green are the schools currently in the process of getting a camera. o We would have to request the vendor to come out and do a speed study to determine whether that specific school would qualify for a speed camera. o Cameras went up in January o There was 30-day warning period. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 28 Packet Pg. 216 9.1.e ■ Almost 900 warnings were given during that 30-day period - 900 x $130 = $117,000. Five cameras at 5k each = $25,000, assuming highest in city of 2475 citations a month, max cost $24,920 a month, $117,000-$49,920 = $67,080 o School Zone Cameras 2 3 a 5 6 7 e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 D E F G H School Zone Times School Add—, Office Phone Start Tl me End Time Early Release Times School Zone Flashin t Lights On Off 5- 931-7495 8:40 15:10 11:40 8:10 15:00 8:50 15:30 Edmonds Elementary 1215 Olympic Ave 425.431.7374 M 14:30 11:00 7:40 8:10 14:20 14:50 Seasiew Elementary 8426188th St. SW 425-431-7383 &00 14:30 11:00 7:40 8:10 14:20 14:50 Sherwood Elementa 22901105th Ave W 425-432-7460 920 15:50 11:00 9'00 9:30 15:40 16:10 West ate Ei—nwy 9601 220th St. SW 425-431-7470 8:40 Madmna K-8 9300 236M St. SW 425431.7979 9:20 15:50 12:20 9:00 9:30 15:25 16:10 Maplewood K-8 8500200th St. SW 425.431.7515 9:20 15:50 12:20 9.00 9:30 15:40 16:10 Holy Pose K-8 770 Aloha St. 425-778-3197 8:10 15:15 M 7:55 8:25 13:30 15:05 15:35 St. SW 425d31-7900 7:20 13:50 201.30 7.00 7:30 14:10 13:40 MENWillif Lain HS 1 23200 100th Ave W 425-431-7270 9:35 14:38 1LU 8:15 14:28 8:45 14:58 Councilmember Nand recognized that the police department put a lot of work and effort into this presentation and she appreciated how data driven it was. For the public, she explained this is one potential tool the council is considering to deal with traffic safety issues at targeted busy intersections. During the pandemic, a friend ended up in the hospital with a broken pelvis due to a pedestrian/vehicle conflict on Highway 99. She was very annoyed when the engineering department put in the raised medians because she was worried her car would get scraped, but she noticed people have stopped running across 7 lanes of traffic going 45+ mph on Highway 99. This is very much a policy decision that will come from the leadership of the administration which is the mayor, and the city council. She assured the police department is very neutral in presenting this information. Councilmember Tibbott said he has a lot of questions and will email some of them to staff. If the City were to move forward with red light cameras, one of his desired outcomes would be that the number of citations would decrease over time. He recalled Chief Bennett thought that could happen, but there was no data provided relative to that. Chief Bennett displayed the graph of Lynnwood's red light cameras accident reduction which is the closest comparable. Councilmember Tibbott pointed out that graph is accident reduction; he was talking about a reduction in citations or in other words, more compliance with following the law. Chief Bennett displayed Lynnwood Police Department's comparable data for 2022 that lists the number of citations and offered to provide data for 2023 and previous years. Councilmember Tibbott relayed an experience while driving in Lynnwood toward the mall when he stopped at a red light and someone sped through the intersection, nearly hitting a pedestrian on the other side of the street at a high rate of speed. He was concerned behavior wouldn't change and as the population increases in the area and it takes longer to get around and people look for shortcuts, one of the ways is to run a red light. The second desired outcome would be an increase in the number police officers in other parts of the City versus parked by a red light writing citations. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 29 Packet Pg. 217 9.1.e Chief Bennett assured officers do not spend their time parked at red lights, that is currently not part of their duties. The police department is very busy and short staffed. There are currently ten vacancies and overtime is mandated almost every day to keep up with minimum staffing. She would be surprised if there wasn't a reduction in behavior just based on people knowing there is a red light cameras at an intersection and anticipated the data would bear that out. As Councilmember Nand said, it is one of the tools to reduce red light running. With a multitude of tools such as education, media, driving school presentations, automated traffic enforcement, etc. will assist with that reduction. This is just one method. Chief Bennett continued, having received a red light camera ticket herself, she guaranteed it changed her behavior when approaching a red light. She assumed most reasonable people would be concerned about running red lights or exceeding the speed limit in a school zone once they received a citation. She has not received a school zone camera infraction; she has four children and is very careful in school zones. In her experience, when drivers see the flashing light in school zones, they slow to 20 mph almost all the time. That speed reduction is very important because studies show every mph more increases the likelihood of serious injury or death to a child. Councilmember Eck expressed appreciation for the analysis and statistics which help show a very logical picture. She agreed no decision has not made; it is something for the council to consider. In her view, any injury resulting from someone running a red light is one too many regardless of the seriousness of the injury. Drivers are distracted by phones and there is no shortage of stress in people's lives. From the standpoint of saving planet, people are encouraged to get out of the cars and walk and bike more often which increases the danger. If a driver is following the law, there is nothing to worry about. When she hears the concern that people will not drive through Edmonds due to red light cameras, she does not sense that Lynnwood's red light cameras have been a problem or impacted their revenue. People from all over the region, not just Edmonds residents or residents of specific areas, use the City's roads. Councilmembers are also community members and are prepared to comply with the law related to red lights. Councilmember Eck asked if a community member is driving and complying with all applicable laws, was there any reason for worry if the City implemented red light cameras. Chief Bennett answered no. Every single citation has to be reviewed to ensure the violation actually occurred. When the light turns red, the car has to be all the way past the line in the intersection to be an infraction Assistant Chief Sniffen said one of the criticism of red light cameras programs he hears a lot is the slow roll right turns and when the violation actually occurs. The law states the vehicle has to enter the intersection when the light turns red; if a driver enters the intersection when the light is yellow, it is not violation. That is why there are white lines in all the intersections to show when the violation actually occurred. With regard to not completely stopping before a right turn on red, in discussions with Lynnwood, that has been the most controversial. Edmonds can set the BRQ rules so those violations aren't triggered or set rules for the people doing the reviewing so it doesn't become a lightning rod for the program. The goal is not a gotcha for people not coming to a complete stop before making a right turn; it is to look for egregious violations that are accident causing behavior. Chief Bennett explained the City would have the ability to determine whether a slow right turn roll through a red light was egregious behavior and whether it was something for which a citation would be issued. It is not intended to be a gotcha program, it is to cite people who are blowing red lights, something she has seen happen with increasing regularity while in her personal car but couldn't do anything about it. That is the behavior the red light cameras are trying to address to avoid death and injury. Councilmember Paine asked Chief Bennett to send out the presentation as it contained more data than the presentation in the packet. With regard to a comment from the public, there are engineering things that can be done to help make things safter. One of those is to slow the walk cycle to give pedestrians more time to cross with no cars in the intersection. She asked what the police department has heard from the 900 warnings Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 30 Packet Pg. 218 9.1.e that were issued from the school zone cameras, noting that was a lot in one month especially considering the amount of time the cameras are operational. Assistant Chief Sniffen answered the cameras are on for 30 minutes in the morning and afternoon in five school zones. The goal is to change driver behavior. There have been 800 citations issued in the 2% weeks the school zone cameras have been live. The City began issuing citations on February 5 so he was uncertain if any of them had reached the court yet. There was very little feedback from the public from the warnings. An automated system sent out the warnings; infractions have to be reviewed, warnings do not, although most of them were reviewed. Anecdotally he heard some people who received a warning said Edmonds is getting serous. From watching the cameras, he has noticed that traffic has slowed in school zones. Councilmember Paine said the decision process in the presentation was very helpful such as cities who couldn't install red light cameras do due to staffing. Other cities like Redmond didn't install red light cameras due to Microsoft which is a political decision, not a public safety decision. She appreciated the data driven proposal, commenting it is good for everyone to remember there are still a lot of decisions to be made. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ECK, THAT THIS COME BACK TO CITY COUNCIL FOR A DECISION DURING APRIL WHETHER TO GO WITH ANY OF THE OPTIONS OR GO WITH RED LIGHT CAMERAS AT ALL. Councilmember Paine commented this is the third presentation; there was one in February when the ordinance was prepared and in November where more information was provided and now the City has some experience with the school zone cameras. For planning and workload purposes, a decision needs to be made regarding whether to proceed with red light cameras and April would be a good timeline to do that. Council President Olson commented this was intended to be a presentation today. Although she acknowledged parliamentary procedures allow the council to take action at any time, she will vote no on the motion in the spirit of this being a presentation. Council will have further discussions and at some point will need to make a decision whether or not to move forward. Councilmember Nand said Councilmember Paine's motion was premature. Red light cameras in Edmonds would require an ordinance or an amendment to the school zone camera ordinance. There still needs to be discussions about funding the studies and the General Fund impacts from the additional FTEs. She felt attempting to rush this through when the school zones cameras were just installed and the community was getting used to them would be unfortunate. As the council contemplates making this major change, there needs to be 100% transparency with the public and appropriate outreach and community engagement which is not the police department's job, it is the council's job because this is a political decision. She will also vote against the motion. Councilmember Paine commented there is an ordinance in place, the one she sent around earlier today also allows for traffic enforcement via red light cameras and the studies are already authorized via that ordinance. Councilmember Dotsch said in reviewing the ordinance she did not believe it allowed for red light cameras as that was a totally separate issue than school zone cameras. This is her first bite at the apple as a councilmember regarding red light cameras and she has a lot of questions that have not yet been answered. She will vote no on the motion as this was intended to be information only. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (3-4), COUNCILMEMBERS ECK, CHEN AND PAINE VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS TIBBOTT, DOTSCH, AND NAND AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING NO. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 31 Packet Pg. 219 9.1.e Council President Olson explained this was brought back by council for discussion, not by the administration or police department staff. She thanked the police department staff for being responsive to her request for a presentation. For the public who may not have been following the issue in November, she referred to the November 14, 2023 minutes that include a vote on red light cameras She quoted from the minutes, "Councilmember Teitzel moved, seconded by Councilmember Buckshnis, to deny decision package 7, red light cameras, at this time and reconsider in 2024." The minutes reflect that several councilmembers explicitly stated they wanted to come back and study red light cameras outside the construct of the budget. That is the reason for this presentation and she thanked police department staff for the data they provided. is. For residents who said they have found information in the media saying red light cameras don't help, she acknowledged support for any position on any subject can be found on the internet and in the media. The sources provided by the police department were very carefully vetted and used source data and peer reviewed articles that support the value of red light cameras. Council President Olson continued, whether there are other ways to achieve the same values can be discussed, but in full transparency, there are several realities, one of which is an increased in reckless driving since the pandemic which she has noticed even on her street. There is also less police enforcement, whether due to a decrease in staffing, increase in violent crimes that keeps officers otherwise occupied, changes in philosophy about the police's engagement with the public, etc. Another reality is the City has some serious financial woes and there is probably a net positive from implementing red light cameras. It is unlikely the City can get out of its financial difficulties by just cutting expenses, there will need to be ways to generate revenue. To the extent the council can deal with some of the problems, such as reckless driving, in a way that helps with public safety as well as addresses the revenue situation in a net positive way is certainly something the council needs to consider as an option. Some people have said red light cameras are not a deterrent; however, she drives very differently than she did before she got pulled over for speeding and received a red light cameras citation. Council President Olson referred to Olympic View Drive, an area with reckless driving, recalling that was not one of the options for a speed camera or red light cameras. Chief Bennett answered Edmonds Elementary is near Olympic View Drive so a school zone camera was something the traffic sergeant believed was implementable. An analysis would need to be done to determine if there are speeding issues. Council President Olson commented that may not be the segment of Olympic View Drive where the fastest speeds are occurring, but if a school zone camera would improve safety for the students, it may be of interest. With higher density comes more pedestrians and near misses don't show up in the data. She applauded the information provided and hoped residents who are so sure the cameras are not needed for a public safety reason would take time to read the presentation which she found very helpful and enlightening. Councilmember Chen expressed appreciation for the studies, data and evidence to support public safety. He agreed his behavior also changed after getting a ticket in Lynnwood. The presentation mentioned red light cameras were studied in 2008 and the same 3 intersections identified then were identified in 2023/2024 so this is nothing new. The council needs to make a decision that will save lives and reduce accidents. The cameras can be studied for another 20-30 years, but lives are being lost and accidents are happening. The council needs to make decision and not wait another 10 years. There is plenty of evidence that red light cameras will improve public safety. He encouraged the council and the public to think about what if the person hit in a red light accident was their family member. COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PAINE, TO EXTEND TO 10:15. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Councilmember Nand said she was glad Councilmembers Paine, Olson and Chen raised the policy part of discussion. It is a happy accident that the presentation from Ms. Kyle regarding the Snohomish County Public Defenders Association and the amount of privilege and barriers to access to justice for low income, immigrant populations, and people with disabilities and vulnerabilities was also tonight. She cautioned the Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 32 Packet Pg. 220 9.1.e council to think about the privilege it requires to be able to take off time in the middle of a work day to go to court and face a judge and prosecutor to contest a ticket. She knew people whose income is over $ 1 00,000/year with college educations who speak English as a first language who have done it; not a lot of people who have to work 40+ hours/week who speak English as a second language or might have trauma or issues of intimidation going to court will do it. This is a policy discussion that needs to occur between politicians that should not involve the police department or courts. She encouraged the council when sharing their personal stories about paying a ticket and it being what they spent on a dinner to consider that that is not the reality for a lot of people who would be affected by this proposal. Councilmember Dotsch relayed in researching 2008, she learned cameras were set up and it was determined it would not have been worth the money to install them. To her, school zone cameras and red light cameras are two totally different things; school zones cameras are universally accepted by the community as necessary to keep kids safe. In looking at the numbers, there is no comparison of the accidents at red lights, stop signs or no traffic control. The data needs to be objective; when driving around Edmonds, she routinely sees drivers running stop signs including a van that ran the stop sign at Dayton & 5' today. She travels 220' a lot; in the data provided regarding the number of vehicles and the number of accidents, it would be 1 accident for every 2.19 million car trips, and Hwy 104 & 100t' would be 1 accident for every 2.37 million car trips. She was trying to understand if the effort and time, especially the police's time when there is such limited staffing, is best used to review red light cameras citations. Councilmember Dotsch referred to the signal at 220' & Highway 99 heading east, at 9:30 a.m. today, the left turn to go north on Highway 99 let 3 cars through and the 4' car ran the light. She referred to an automated enforcement checklist she shared today that was produced by Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, the Governor's Highway Safety Association, National Safety Council, and AAA that states successful programs are transparent and have a strong public information component. She advocated for more engagement with the public regarding red light cameras and the location of cameras. She referred to the intersection comparisons which do not reflect what is happening two blocks away where there isn't a red light cameras. The safety groups caution against comparing the same intersections and data because it does not indicate whether there is an overall reduction. With regard to speeding in school zones, she said it would be interesting to know if speeds are decreasing there as well. Councilmember Dotsch suggested considering how to engage with the public before making a decision on red light cameras. It may be worthwhile to consider the timing of signals and whether it is appropriate for the volume of traffic; signals that only let a limited number of cars through may motivate drivers to run the red light. She asked if that was reviewed as part of this proposal, something that the safety group's checklist recommended. Chief Bennett said most of the studies Councilmember Dotsch cited were the same ones she cited in her presentation. The safety group's recommendation follows Verra's program including media piece, identification, doing research, etc. Community engagement is important such as was done with the school zone cameras. Traffic engineers can consider timing of signals; they utilize an algorithm and methodology for signal timing as there are a lot of factors in determining signal timing. Even if someone gets delayed at a signal, it does not give them the right to run the red light because the other direction then has a green light and running the red light can result in a T-bone accident that often results in major injuries. Assistant Chief Sniffen agreed the proposal went through a lot of the same steps cited by the safety group. There was engagement done regarding the school zone cameras and agreed the engagement the safety groups recommended such as stakeholder groups would be a good step. With regard to timing of the signals, engineering would need to be involved due to the number of inputs that determine timing. Chief Bennett commented on the importance of an advisory group having a diverse set of opinions including schools, law enforcement, fire department, etc. She was not opposed to an advisory group as long as it was well balanced with a variety of stakeholders including the court. The data she received for 2020-2022 did not have a lot of depth and breadth to it. The 2023 data does identify actual intersection related collisions; at 220t' & Highway 99, there were 13 in 2023. She referred to the intersection related collisions total and location for Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 33 Packet Pg. 221 9.1.e 2023, indicating the ones in gray are stop sign controlled intersections, the intersections in red are signal controlled intersections. Information will continue to be tracked through 2024; it is really important to be transparent and communicate with the community about the numbers as it should not be a program that is implemented without due process and transparency. Councilmember Dotsch asked if those accidents were all the result of running the red light or just accidents that happened at the intersection. Chief Bennett answered the accidents are intersection -related. Councilmember Dotsch said she was surprised to see how many one car accidents there were. As there are are now U turns on Highway 99; Councilmember Dotsch asked if the red light cameras would catch those. Chief Bennett answered if the light is still green or yellow when the vehicle enters the intersection, it is not a violation. Assistant Chief Sniffen said the camera takes a series of three photographs as the car moves through the intersection. Councilmember Eck commented as the council discusses this over the next few weeks or months, she encouraged councilmembers to look at the logic and the statistics and keep in mind this is about empathy and caring for our family members, neighbors, and community members and not having one person injured. COUNCILMEMBER PAINE MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON, TO EXTEND TO 10:23. UPON ROLL CALL, MOTION FAILED (4-3) FOR LACK OF A SUPER MAJORITY, COUNCILMEMBERS ECK, PAINE, AND NAND AND COUNCIL PRESIDENT OLSON VOTING YES; COUNCILMEMBERS CHEN, TIBBOTT AND DOTSCH VOTING NO. 11. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Rosen had no comments. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Eck acknowledged February is Black History Month. It is a tradition that started in the Jim Crow era and was officially recognized in 1976 as part of the national bicentennial celebration. It aims to honor the contributions that African Americans have made and to recognize their sacrifices. It is an important recognition to pause and take note of. Councilmember Paine expressed appreciation for the conversation about red light cameras. She pointed out driver's ed is no longer taught in schools so there are at least 20 years' worth of students who if they did not receive driver training through a private vendor, no longer get it in school which is something to consider in the driving mishaps that occur. Council President Olson expressed her extreme appreciation to Snohomish County for the wonderful, supportive grant they provided for parks and open space. Councilmember Nand acknowledged the loss of Alexei Navalny on February 16, the leader of the opposition to Vladimir Putin and his murderous regime. This is a great loss for the opportunity for peace, democracy, and government accountability in Russia. She is making these comments due to disturbing pro- Putin comments she has seen in local Facebook groups. ADJOURNMENT With no further business, the council meeting was adjourned at 10:14 pm. Edmonds City Council Draft Minutes February 20, 2024 Page 34 Packet Pg. 222 Police Departmei__ Edmonds Police Depart Red -Light Cameras oz/Zo/Zoz4 N LO N C d d a ent 11 FIA, I Packet Pg. 224 1 9.1.f • From hiring challenges to Hwy 99 to homelessness, new police chief addresses community questions • Posted: November 22, 2021 • Chief Bennett made it clear that she would like to see traffic cameras at every school crossing; in fact, "I would make all traffic infractions covered by cameras." Traffic issues, she added, are the number -one complaint the city gets. Fair warning. — By Bob Throndsen Packet Pg. 225 r- I► AL J1� mik a �l W-1 I. , l /1 1 10 4H) y , OW *40 Mo� • nT'1iFTit:17[7IFif' Ao AF M07. 9.1.f r 1 a Packet Pg. 226 9.1.f Comparable Data • The intersections suggested are the highest volume intersection related accidents in the city. • Lynnwood, Kent, Lake Forest Park, Renton, Sea-Tac, Seattle have these, and many other agencies (Everett, Bothell) are also looking at them. • The city of Lynnwood is a relevant comparable city. LYNNWOOD W A S H I N G T O N 2022 Annual Automated Traffic Safety Camera Report Lynnwood Police Department Per RCW 46.63.170 cities using automated traffic safety cameras must post an annual report of the number of traffic accidents that occurred at each location where an automated traffic safety camera is located, as well as the number of notices of infraction issued for each camera on the City's website. The below data comprises the number of accidents and citations issued at each respective intersection and school zone where traffic safety cameras are deployed. Intersection Number of Citations *Number of Accidents 361h / 196th St S.W. 6,070 3 44'h /Aid. Mall Blvd. 3,514 8 (A) 44'h / 19611- St S.W. 0 - Under Construction. 6 184'h / Aid. Mall Pkwy 4,728 6 196'h / Ald. Mall Pkwy 14,163 2 Maple / Aid. Mall Pkwy 1,900 3 19611 / Hwy 99 2,834 5 441" / 20011 St S.W. 5,063 8 (A) Hwy 99 / 20011 St S.W. 1,164 3 Number of Number of School Zone Citations Accidents a 18200 -18800 BLK 44th Ave West 4,175 1 5500 - 6600 BLK 168th St S.W. 2,660 Number of Accidents reported reflect collisions occurring within the intersection Packet Pg. 227 Lynnwood Red Light Camera Collisions 280 260 240 220 200 so so i40 2D 2022 44 2021 36 2020 29 2019 11 2018 14 2017 20 2016 80 2015 92 2014 83 2013 111 2012 161 0 Packet Pg. 228 9.1.f 11:481 .I LTE CE AA & mynorthwest.com 6 97.3FM K1�RROADIO _ CHOKEPOINTS 'Speeding is getting to be a bigger concern': Auburn's school zone traffic cameras return Mar 22, 2022, 5:38 AM I Updated: 9:39 am (Chris Sullivan, KIRO Newsradio) BY CHRIS SULLIVAN KIRO Newsradio traffic reporter < > U Share P► � l Didn't some cities do away with Red Light Cameras? • Called Kent Police Chief Padilla, 'Heck no, they are very effective for the city, we are actually adding six more. Also funded our body worn camera program' When asked if rear -end collisions increased, he stated that they have actually gone down. • Kenmore is adding two cameras this year. • Auburn: Researching their website yesterday, led me to their links about photo enforcement... Reinstating cameras: March 22nd, 2022, adding 6-12 cameras. • Communicated with Redmond Police Lieutenant Julie Beard and Chief Darrell Lowe, 'We had them in around 2012 for several months, Microsoft lobbied hard (with company attorneys assisting) against them. We've been talking about putting them back: • Communication sent to Chief Ted Boe of Burien PD. Chief Boe said they have 'not had them in at least six years, speculated reason for removal was labor based, lowest staffed city and most calls per service in King County; no new officers in 12 years. No traffic cars or motor officers are assigned to the city. We have 26 cops to handle 21,000 calls per year. Packet Pg. 229 Accidents and Safety 9.1.f Packet Pg. 230 Edmonds Proposed Pilot Red -Light Camera Program: Collision Data Data for accidents in Edmonds intersections was collected from 2020- 2022. An analysis of collision data was conducted, in addition to gathering input from the officers who investigate many of these collisions. Also considered were officer's observations of high pedestrian areas as well as areas of common citizen complaints. Accidents: Three Years of`�.at� �2020-2022) tential Red -Light Camera Intersections 9.1.f A 6 C D E F G H I J K 1` Collision Report Number Collision Date County City Jurisdiction Agency Primary TraljiCWdy Secondary Tra(Acway Block Number Intersection Related Weather Condition 2 EA01404 1/1/202018:23 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 224THSTSW 22400 Y Raining 3 EA17398 2/22/202021,58 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220TH ST SW 22000 Y Raining 4 EA20495 3/3/202017:36 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220THSTSW 22000 Y Clear 5 EA21122 3/8/202013:12 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 23UH ST SW 23700 Y Overcast 6 EA30525 4/17/202014:53 Snohomish Lynnwood State Road State Patrol SR 99 228TH ST SW 22800 Y Clear 7 EA61800 9/6/202023:00 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR 99 244TH ST SW 24400 Y Clear 8 EA63049 9/8/202014:48 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 Y Clear 9 EA68779 10/2/202022.28 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 2381HSTSW 23800 Y Clear 10 EA76826 10/31/202013:22 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 216TH ST SW 21600 Y Clear 11 EA82349 11/18/20208:SO Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/CityPolice HWY 99 224STSW 22400 Y Raining 12 EA86389 12/3/20209:20 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR99 216TH ST SW 21600 Y Clear 13 EB09806 2/26/202116,34 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224THSTSW 22300 N Y 14 EB10820 3/2/202113:48 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR99 216THSTSW 21600 N Y 15 EB13203 3/10/202115:36 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR99 244THSTSW 24400 N Y 16 EB14597 3/17/202113:42 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/CityPolice HIGHWAY 99 220THSTSW 22D00 N Y 17 E518605 4/1/202116:30 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 220TH ST SIN 21900 N Y 18 EB33976 5/27/202115:30 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 239TH ST SW 23800 N Y 19 EB63582 9/1/202117:55 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220TH ST SW 22000 N Y 20 E569371 9/19/202117:25 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 236TH ST SW 23600 N Y 21 EBBo909 10/17/202121:18Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/CityPolice HWY 99 220STSW 21900 N Y 22 EB81118 10/2412021227 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/CityPolice HIGHWAY 99 220THSTSIN 21900 N Y 23 EB83111 10/28/202120:54 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR99 229TH ST SW 22800 N Y 24 EB98477 12/2/202119.14 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224 ST SW 22400 N Y 25 EC14225 1/22/202215.36 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 224THSTSW 22400 N Y 26 EC16976 2/2/20220.57 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR99 216THSTSW 21600 N Y 27 EC20595 2/14/20226:30 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/CityPolice HIGHWAY 99 244THSTSW 24400 N Y 28 EC20173 2/14/20221148 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 N Y 29 EC21933 2/20/202222,50 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 23UHSTSW 23800 N Y 30 EC45462 5/10/202216.40 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR-99 224TH ST SW 22400 N Y 31 EC51868 6/2/2022 21:16 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 220 ST SW 21900 N Y 32 EC54781 6/10/202213:36 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 N Y 33 EC59118 6/23/202218:30 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 220TH ST SW 22D00 N Y 34 EC70496 8/3/20226:31 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 212TH ST SW 21200 N Y 35 EC82621 9/10/2022 20.56 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 22UH ST SW 22800 N Y 36 EC84480 9/15/202218:16 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 212TH ST SW 21200 N Y 37 EC98425 10/29/202222:11 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 224THSTSW 22400 N Y 38 E010622 12/2/202223:37 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224THSTSIN 22400 N Y 39 ED13020 12/10/20226:35 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224 ST SW 22300 N Y 40 ED18246 12/24/20221942 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220TH ST SW 22000 N Y 41 L M N Light ng Condition Injury Severity Object Struck Dark -Street Lights On Minor Injury Collision Dark -Street lights On Minor Injury Collision Daylight Minor Injury Collision Daylight Minor Injury Collision Daylight NoInjury Collision Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Daylight NoInjury Collision Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision NONE Daylight NoInjury Collision Daylight Minor injury Collision Metai l) ity Boa Daylight NoInjury Collision Overcast Daylight NoInjury Collision Clear Daylight linorInjury Collisic Clear Daylight NoInjury Collision Clear Daylight NoInjury Collision Clear Daylight Noinjury Collision Raining Daylight NoInjury Collision Clear Daylight NoInjury Collision Overcast Daylight linor Injury Collisic Raining Dark -Street lights On NoInjury Collision Clear Dark -Street Lights On linor Injury Collisic Raining Dark -Street Lights On Noinjury Collision Clear Dark -Street lights On NoInjury Collision Clear Daylight linor Injury Collisic Clear Dark -Street Lights On linor Injury Collisic Overcast Dark -Street Lights On linor Injury Collisic Clear Daylight linor Injury Collisic Clear Dark -Street Lights On NoInjury Collision Clear Daylight NoInjury Collision Clear Dark -Street Lights On linor Injury Collisic Overcast Daylight Noinjury Collision Clear Daylight Noinjury Collision Clear Daylight NoInjury Collision Fog or Smog or Smoke Dark -Street lights On linor Injury Collisic Clear Daylight known Injury Collis Clear Dark -Street Lights On NoInjury Collision Snowing Dark -Street Lights On linor Injury Collisic Raining Dark -Street Lights On linorInjury Collisic Clear Dark -Street lights On NoInjury Collision Damage Threshold Met Hitand Run Motor Vehices wl Y N 2 Y N 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 3 2 2020 HWY 99 Collisions 220th and 76th Collisions 22Dth and 9th Collisions 212th and 76th Collisions HWY 104 and Dayton Collisions HWY 104 and 100th Collisions 228th and 76th Collisions Packet Pg. 233 Six Potential Highway 99 Red - Light Camera Intersections • 224t" and Highway 99: 12 Accidents, 16,000 cars per day • 220t" and Highway 99: 11 Accidents, 20,000 cars per day • 238t" and Highway 99: Five Accidents, 20,000 cars per day • 216t" and Highway 99: Five Accidents, 20,000 cars per day • 228t" and Highway 99: Three Accidents, 16,000 cars per day • 212t" and Highway 99: Two Accidents, 20,000 cars per day Additional High Accident and Car Volume Intersections (Non -Highway 99) • 2201" and 761": 13 Accidents, 12,000 cars per day • 2121" and 761": 15 Accidents, 6000 cars per day • Highway 104 and 1001": Six Accidents, 13,000 cars per day File Home Insert Draw 19 v n v Page Layout Formulas Data Review View Automate Help Q Tell me what you want to do F 9.1.f P Cor Z4 v A A B C D E F G F• K Collision Report Number Collision Date County City Jurisdiction Agency PrimaryTrafficway Secondary Trafficway Block Number School Zone Intersection Rel; EA15884 2/5/2020 14:10 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 220TH ST SW 76TH AVE W 7500 N y EA21441 3/6/2020 19:29 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 220TH ST SW 76TH AVE W N EA55371 8/14/2020 15:00 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 220TH ST SW 76TH AVE W N 5 EA61190 9/3/2020 20:26 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 220 ST SW 76 AVE W 7600 N 6 EA23427 3/12/2020 10:45 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76 AVE W 220 ST SW 22000 N 7 EA12363 2/4/2020 17:52 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVE W 220TH ST SW 21900 N 8 EA14906 2/14/2020 12:48 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVE W 220TH ST SW 22000 N 9 EA88314 12/9/2020 17:25 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVE W 220TH ST SW 2200 N 10 EA92026 12/21/2020 16:40 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVE W 220TH ST SW N 11 EB06244 2/14/2021 19:40 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVE W 220TH ST SW N 12 EB23743 4/20/2021 16:15 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 220TH ST SW 76TH AVE W N 13 EC63100 7/10/2022 21:36 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 220TH ST SW 76TH AVE W 7600 N 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 > - 2020 HWY 99 Collisions Workbook Statistics 220th and 76th Collisions 220th and 9th Collisions 212th and 76th Collisions HWY 104 and I Packet Pg. 236 Excel Red Light Camera Intersectionsidu 4, Download Q Save to OneDrive File Horne Insert Draw Page Layout Formulas Data Review View Automate Help Q Tell me what you rit to do 9.1.f N LO 7 N C X ® C netts C � A B C D E F G N I 1 K l M N O 1 Collision Report Number Collision Date County City Jurisdiction Agency PrimaryTrafhcway SecondaryTrafticway Block Number School Zone Intersection Related Weather Condition Lighting Condition Injury Severity �0♦ Damage Thresh( V Hit a' 2 EA15169 2/15/202020:06 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 212TH ST SW 76TH AVE W N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision N 3 EA59850 8/31/202015:06 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 212TH Sr SW 76TH AVEW 7600 N Y Clear Daylight Minor I njury Coll ision N L 4 EA01885 1/12/2020 21:17 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVE W 212TH ST SW N Y Snowing Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y di 5 EA11297 2/5/202013:17 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVEW 212TH ST SW 21200 N Y Raining Daylight No Injury Collision Y E 6 EA70780 10/9/202017:28 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVEW 212TH ST SW 7600 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y CU 7 EB98901 12/8/202117:20 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVE W 212TH Sr SW 21200 N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y U 8 EB29948 5/13/202218:20 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 212TH ST SW 76TH AVEW 7600 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision N 4+ 9 EB38228 6/11/202115:32 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 212TH ST SW 76TH AVEW 7600 N Y Raining Daylight No Injury Collision Y 10 EB67478 9/14/20217:10 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 212 ST SW 76 AVEW N Y Clear Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y 11 EC66447 7/21/202210:00 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 222 ST SW 76 AVEW N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y 12 ED16286 12/19/20229:00 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 212 ST SW 76 AVEW N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y 13 ED16188 12/19/202210:30 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 212 ST SW 76 AVEW N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 6L 14 EC46309 5/12/2022 21:30 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 212TH ST SW 76TH AVE W N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y 15 EC29476 3/17/202215:24 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/CityPolice 76THAVE W 212THSTSW N Y Raining Daylight Minor Injury Collision IN ci 16 17 O 18 a 19 N 20 21 22 0 23 E 24 25 W 26 r 27 28 0 (13 O 31 i 32 < = HWY 99 Collisions 220d1 and 76th Collisions 22001 and 9th Collisions 21M and 76th Coll' '- HWY 104 and Dayton Collisions HWY 104 and 100th Collisions 226th and 76th Collisions w a Packet Pg. 237 1 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 I 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A A B C D E F G H , Collision Report Number Collision Date County City Jurisdiction Agency Primary Trafficway Secondary Trafficway Block Number School Zone EA16280 2/19/2020 15:10 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR 104 100TH AVE W 10000 N EA18534 2/26/2020 11:21 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 104 100TH AVE W N EA56441 8/17/2020 12:40 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 104 100TH AVE W N EB30611 5/16/2021 12:53 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 104 100 AVE W N ED01660 11/6/2022 23:00 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR 104 100TH AVE W N ICI < > = 220th and 9th Collisions 212th and 76th Collisions HWY 104 and Dayton Collisions Workbook Statistcs HWY 104 and 100th Collisions 2 9.1.f N L0 7 N K C Intersection Rel Y N Y Y O Y = 3 Y O U to m E M U w s a� O V O a m C O E W C t4 C tv N d L a- r c d t1 RQ Q Packet Pg. 238 9.1.f I 2.38 1 Name SLS Request T O Ion Number SLS Stage Name 1 V 2 •• 3 4 Average Dal Traffic Vear ADT Count 5 Approval Value Updated AADT Da ADT Source URI Constructable Constpuctabifity Comments WAEDM 2 Red Light IComplete EB 224th St@SW Padfic Hwy/SR 99 F T N/A (donY have data for that approach) N/A 3.82 N/A Yes Google earth shows vehicles parl 3 WAEDM Red Light 1Complete NB SR 99/Pacific Hwy @220th St SW F 't` ?' 20,000 2022 3.71 Provided by Ci Yes 20'slanted stop bar seperationG 4 WAEDM Red Light 1Complete SB SR 99 Pacific Hwy @220th St SW F % ?' 20,000 2222 3.83 Provided by Cit Yes 27 slanted stc, bar seperation b 5 WAEDM Red Light 1Comlete SB Pacific HV/SR 99@212th St SW F t T 4 20,0Do 2022 3.1 Provided by Yes 16'slanted stop barSin lepole re 6 WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB Pacific Hwy/ SR 99 @ 216th St SW F % % 20,000 2022 3.63 Provided by Ci Yes 22'slanted stop bar,Sin le pole r 7 WAEDM Red Light IComplete NO SW Pacific H / SR 99@ 238th St SW E 'P 11 20,000 2022 3.91 Provided by Cit Yes 27 slanted stop bar/stop bar sep 8 WAEDM Red Light 3Complete SB SW Pacific Hwy /SR 99@238th St SW F % % 20,000 2022 4.72 Provided by CH, Yes 17 slanted stop bar,Sin le poles 9 WAEDM Red Light IComplete NO Pacific Hwy /SIR 99@224th St SW F 'i' T 16,000 2022 3.41 Provided by CI Yes 23'slanted stop bar,5 stem place 10 WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB Pacific Hwy/ SR 99 @ 224th St. SW F % % 16,000 2D22 2.52 Provided by CI Yes 20'slanted stop bar,5 stem plaa U. WAEDM Red Light IComplete NO SW Pacific Hwy /SR 99@228th St SW F 'P 'r 16,000 2022 4.05 Provided by CI Yes 22'slanted stop bar,Sin le poles 12 WAEDM Red Light 1Complete SB SW Pacific Hwy SR 99@228th St SW F % % 16,000 2D22 2.53 Provided by Cl Yes At max distance;21'slanted stop 13 WAEDM Red Light IComplete WB220th St SW@SR 99/Pacific Hwy 14,000 2022 2.95 Provided by Ci Yes 20'slanted stop bar seperation b, L4 WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible WB 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW FT 14,000 2D22 N/A N/A No System placement issue due to a L5 WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete NB Hwy 104 @ IODth Ave W Ti 13,000 2022 3.42 Provided by Cit Yes At min distance from stop bar,Sir L6 WAEDM RedU ht 1 Complete WB 100th Ave W @ Hwy 104 13,000 2022 3.19 Provided by Cit Conditional Conditional, Ma'or tree trim;Tree L7 WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 220th St SW @ 76th Ave W F T 'T'i 12,000 2022 2.91 Provided by Ci Yes Single pole rear radar in range or M WAEDM RedUht 1 Complete SB Hwy 104 @ 100th Ave W 32,ODO 2022 3.5 Provided by CI Yes Sin le pole rear radar in ran a or L9 WAEDM Red Light I Complete EB 100th Ave W @ Hwy 104 F % T� 12,DOO 2022 3.46 Provided by Ci Yes Slightly curved approach;Sin le LO WAEDM Red Light IComplete EB 220th St SW@SR 99/Pacific H F T 'r 11,OD0 2022 5.3 Provided by Ci Yes 16'slanted stop bar separation b, U. WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete NB 1ODth Ave /9th Ave S @ Elm Way / 200th St SW FT i 8,000 2022 2.81 Provided by Ci Yes Single pole rear radar in ran eor 12 WAEDM Red Light 1Complete SB 100th Ave/9th Ave S@Elm Way/200th St SW F 'r4 81000 2022 2.69 Provided by CI Yes Single pole rear radar in range or I3 WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW 6'WG 2D22 2.95 Provided by CH, Yes Single pole rear radar in range or M WAEDM Red Light I Complete NO 76th Ave W @ 212th Street SW F 'r 61000 2022 4.08 Provided by CI Yes Utilities in areaSin le Pole rear r. IS WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible SB 76th Ave W @ 212th Street SW F t 6,000 2D22 N/A N/A No S stemplacement issue, not witl 26 WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 212th Street SW @ 76th Ave W F t 4 61000 2022 3.99 Provided by Cit Yes Single pole rear radar in range, 27 WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete WB 212th Street SW @ 76th Ave W F t i 6,000 2022 4.06 Provided by Ci Yes Single pole rear radar in range or 28 WAEDM Red Light Complete EB 212th St SW 9D Pacific SR 99 F'r ?�6,000 2M 2.52 Provided by Ci Yes Single pole rear radar in range or 29 WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible WB Elm Way/200th St SW@100th Ave/9th Ave FT 4,000 2D22 N/A N/A No Donot recommend, X'ADA Ilea io WAEDM Red Light IComplete EB 216th St SW@Pacific Hwy /SR 99 3,200 2023 2.38 Provided CI Yes Single pole rear radarm rang, or it WAEDM Red Light 1Complete WB 224th St@SW Pacific Hwy /SR 99 F'j' 3,200 2D23 2.661Provided by Cit Yes NO ROW on shoulder,Recommen 12 WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible NO 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW F 14 Z500 2022 N/A N/A No System placement issue, no ADA 13 WAEDM Red Light 3Com fete WB 228th St SW@SW Pacific Hwy /SR 99 F T� 2,SW 2023 2.73 Providetlb CI Yes Sin le of a re arradarinran eor ib WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible EB 278th St @SW Pacific /SR 99 F q'� 2,000 2D23 N/A Providedb Cl No System placement issue due tod IS WAEDM Red Light N/ANot Const—tiblel EB Elm We /20Dth St SW@100th Ave /9th Ave <- 1,500 1 2022 1 N/A N/A No I Do not recommend, no ROW, cu 16 WAEDM Red Light IComplete I EB 238th St SW@SW Pacific Hwy/SR 99 <- 100 ,5 2023 6 OA Provided by Ci Yes I Bus stop on zhoulder,Yielding RT r Q Packet Pg. 239 11 - fx Average Daily Traffic . u n 9.1.f JA—W N Mar AOfCWt AOf%—UQComa—tal C—unattal ltymare N/A dont have data 2 for that aoproaCh) N/A N/A Yes (3oogle earth snows venides parked on ROW,Small raised curbed shoulder;Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder night before driveway, about 98' from stop bar to capture Ll & 2; 3 20.000 2022 3. Provided by City Yes 20slanted stop bar seperstion betwem Ll and 4.&rqle pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway, about 100'" the bottom of the slanted stop bar to capture Ll Mru 4; 4 20,000 2022 SM Provided by City Yes 27' slanted stop bar separation between Ll and 4,Sngle pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway, about 100' from the bottom of the slanted stop bar to capture L1 thru 4, 5 20000 2022 3.1 Provided by City Yes I6'slamed stop badingle pole rear radar in nittile on shoulder after drivewary to capture LI tlfru 4; 6 20,000 2022 SM Provided by City Yes 22' slanted stop bar,Ssngle pole rear radar in range on shoulder to capture Ll thru 4; 7 200000 2022 3N Provided by City Yes 27' slanted stop bar/stop bar sepmrion,Single pole rear radar in range w shoulder, about 93' from LT stop bar to capture LI Uru 4;20mm ANPR required; 8 20,000 2022 4.72 Provided by City Yes 17' slanted stop bar,Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder about 100' from bottom of the stop bar to capture Ll thru 4;20mm ANPR required; 9 16,000 2022 3AI Provided by Vas 23' slanted stop bar;5ystem placement limitation due to driveway, Unable to capture LT lane,Sngle pole rear radar In range on shoulder, about 102' from stop bar to capture L2 thru 4,Possible tree thm 10 16,000 2022 25 Provided by Yes 20' slanted stop bar;System placement limitation due to driveway, unable to capture RT lane 4At max distance,Single pole rear repair in range on shoulder right after driveway/befbm storm drain, about 117 from bottom of LT stop bar to capture Ll thru 3; Il 16,000 2022 4.05 Provided by City Yes 22' slanted stop bar;Single pole rear radar on shoulder after storm brain / before driveway, abort 120 from top of the stop bar to capture Ll thru 4;20mm ANPR required; 12 16,000 2022 253 Provided by City Yes At max distance,21' slanted stop bar,Uneble to capture RT lane 4 due to driveway; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder right after or,veway/before storm drain to capture LI thru 3; 13 11000 2022 2 Provided by Yes 20' slanted stop bar separation between Ll and 3Approach is uphill, about 9%mclineSystern placement limitation clue to curve and obstruction from utility pole near stop bar driveM, unable to capture RTSingle pole rear radar in range on shoulder after utility pole, about 14 14,000 2022 N/A NO System placement issue due to obstruction from unity poles; other utilities in area; 15 13 Wl) 2022 3.4 Provided by Yes At min distance from stop bar;Single pole rear radar in range m shoulder before norm drain, about 100' from stop bar to capture Ll & 2; 16 13000 2022 3.19 Provided by City Conditional Conditional, Major tree tnm;Tree on snoulder obstructing traffic signal.Unde,ground unimes in area;Si pole rear radar in range on shoulder, about 100' from stop bar to capture Ll thnl 3; 17 12,01W 2022 29 Provided by City Yes Single pole rear radar in range w shoulder before utility pole, about 95' from the stop bar to capture Ll & 2; 18 IzW0 2022 3. Provided by CityVas Si ngle pole fear radar In range w shoulder before driveway, about 122' from stop bar to capture LI thru 3; 19 izow 2022 3.4rA Provided by CityYes Sr ntiy Curved approach;5i ! Ode rear raper in ra eon shoulder, abort 100' horn stop bar to Capture LI tinN 3; 20 1 000 2022 5. Provided by Yes 16' slanted stop bar separation between Ll and 3,Si a pole rear radar in ran eon shoulder after udliry pole, about 100' iron the bottom of Ne slanted nap Osr tocara Ll Vau 3; 21 SAW 2022 2.8 Provided by City Yes Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before utility pole, about 95' from stop bar to capture L3 & 2; 22 8,000 2022 2. Provided Oy City Yes Si ngle pole rear radar in range on shoulder before storm dram, about 95' from stop bar to capture Ll & 2; 23 6,000 2022 2.0 Provided by City Yes Si ngle pole rear radar in range on shoulder before utility pole, about 92' from the L2 stop bar to capture Ll & 2; 24 6,000 2022 4. Provided by Cityvas Utilities in area5in a pole rear radar In range on shoulder before before light pole, about 95' from stop bar to capture LI thru 3; 25 60000 2022 N/A NO System placement issue, not vAthm recommended placement due to Onveway and underground utilmes; 26 6.000 2022 3.0 Provided by City Yes Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after, abort 122' from stop bar to capture Ll thru 3; 27 6,000 2022 4. Provided by City Yes Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway, about 125ftom stop bar to capture Ll thru 3; 28 6 OW 2022 2.52 P—ded IN, Clef Yes Sirale pole rear raper In range on shoulder about 100' from SWO bar to capture LI & 1 29 4,000 2022 Wt4 N/A NO Do not recommend, >4' ADA clearance; 30 3,200 2023 Provided by City Yes Singlepoierear radar in range on shoulder after driveway to capture Ll 8, 2; 31 3,200 2023 2fA Provided by City Yes No ROW on shoulder;Recornmend single pole rear radar on opposde side after driveway, about 100' from the stop bar to capture L3 & 2; 32 Z500 2022 Ill N/A No System placement issue, no ADA Clearance; 33 2,500 2023 2.731 ProvdWWy Orly Yes I Sinoepole rear radar in range on shoulder about 100' from bottom of the stop bar to capture LI & 2; 34 2,W0 2023 Provided by No System placement issue due to driveway, 35 1,500 36 1,500 37 700 2022 2023 1 2023 N/A Provided bV Smyes Provided bvcimy. Imp Do not recommend, no ROW curved road, approach is on a Ngh slope, I Bus stop of shoulderfilelcing RT lane 2,single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after bus stop, about 115' from stop br to cal U; ISingle pole rear radar in range w shoulder after driveway, about 110'trom stop bar to capture Ll; Page 1 } Workbook Statistics ® P Type here to search Gi - 50°F Cloudy n 4D I,)) 13,11 11/11/2021 50.4 Total per day x 30 = 1512, x31 = 1562 • Column L represents the number of daily projected violations for that specific movement (based on the running VERRA Mobility of their algorithm). • The rows where a N/A is shown are the ones where specific Rating ( to low) restrictions have been identified for such an addition (such as limited ROW, topography issues (as identified in Column P). Packet Pg. 240 • 2201" and Highway 99: VERRA Rating- 5.3 (10 accidents) 20, cars per day • 2381" and Highway 99, Southbound: VERRA Rating- 4.72 (five accidents) 20,000 cars LO • 2281" and Highway 99: VERRA Rating- 4.05 (three accidents) 161000 cars • 2121" and 76t" Northbound: VERRA Rating- 4.08 (15 accidents) 6000 cars 0 U • 2121" and 761" Westbound VERRA Rating- 4.06 (15 accidents) 6001 ca rs • 2121" and 761" Eastbound VERRA Rating- 3.99 (15 accidents) 6000 ca rs • 238t" and Highway 99 Northbound: VERRA Rating- 3.91 (five 0 accidents) 16,000 cars 0 • SR 99 and 216t": VERRA Rating- 3.68 (five accidents) 20,000 cars W • Hwy 104 and 100t" Southbound: VERRA Rating- 3.5 (six accidents) o 131000 cars 0 • Hwy 104 and 100t" Northbound: VERRA Rating- 3.42 (six a accidents) 13,000 cars 0 • SR 99 and 224t": VERRA Rating- 3.41 (12 accidents) 16,000 cars Hwy 104 and 100t" Westbound: VERRA Rating- 3.19 (six accidents a 131000 cars • SR 99 and 212t"VERRA Rating- 3.1 (two accidents) 20,qPacket Pg. 241 9.1.f Another Potential Danger Of Intersection Related Crashes Police: Edmonds man `overreacted,' shot apologetic rideshare driver Alex Waggoner was reportedly crossing the street when Abdulkadir Shariff Gedi almost hit him. Waggoner then opened fire. by Jonathan Tall Friday, January 12, 2024 5:24pm EDMONDS — After Abdulkadir Shariff Gedi almost struck a pedestrian while making a left turn in Edmonds, the driver appeared to roll down the window to apologize, according to a police review of dashcam footage. Detectives believe Alex Waggoner, 21, then shot the rideshare driver to death in a brief and random confrontation, where the shooter was in no imminent danger. Amare Geda, a longtime ride -hail driver and father of two, was killed while on the iob in Sodo in August. Prosecutors charged an 18-year-old woman with first -degree murder in that case. Driver advocates have previously pushed for more cameras, improved technology and legislation to ensure drivers are paid enough to avoid working second jobs or late -night hours. Packet Pg. 242 9.1.f nrL6destrlan 2201" and HWY 99 = 1 • 212t"and 76t"=2 iccidents • HWY 104 and 100t" = 0 (Recently a homicide at the light at Hwy 104 and .ntersection the 8800 block, (12 blocks away) Intersection related near pedestrian crash. Packet Pg. 243 AL rY"iil no Academic and Empirical Research +rig U L. M (3) C) nrolo U Road crashes are a prime cause of death and disability, and red- light running is a common cause of crashes at signalized intersections. More than one million crashes occur annually at traffic signals in the United States, and red-light cameras increasingly are being used to supplement police -enforcement efforts by automatically photographing vehicles whose drivers run red lights. Red-light running at signalized intersections is a significant . problem in the United States; it results in more than 95,000 crashes and approximately 1,000 deaths per year. A U � z , � o U In Washington state, traffic fatalities were up 38% last year compared with 2019, reaching a 30-year high. In response, the state is considering expanding its limited speed camera use. State officials plan aXM,-,.,:T.M • to see how that country used automated en orcement to reduce traffic deaths. "Law enforcement has really stepped back from enforcing traffic laws," said Jonathan Adkins, CEO of the Governors Highway Safety Association. "We have to get police back out there and get support for police back. But this has to be done the right way, and it has to be done fairly. And we do want to look at technology — cameras don't see race, they don't see gender." ad 9.1.f Two pedestrians struck in Perrinville neighborhood Sunday Edmonds police on Sunday afternoon were called to the scene of a vehicle collision in the Perrinville neighborhood, where two pedestrians were struck near 76th Avenue West and Olympic View Drive. Both patients were transported to Seattle's Harborview Medical Center, Edmonds Packet Pg. 247 9.1.f C J Academic Research: Studies Cited PUBLICATIONS: • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety • Safety Evaluation of Red - Light Cameras, Federal Highway Administration • National Library of Medicine • Journal of Safety Research OWN 6GO&a7 N O&OW © :+•v.� dmft r. M 4 .c Packet Pg. 248 9.1.f • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine • American scientific academv • The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, also known as the National Academies, is a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national nations lacadem ies.org Founder Federal Government of the United States • Headquarters Keck Center • 500 5th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20001 • Subsidiaries National Academy of Sciences (NAS) • National Academy of Engineering (NAE) • National Academy of Medicine (NAM) • Legal status Congressionally Chartered Nonprofit Organization • Purpose Provide independent, objective advice to inform policy with evidence, spark progress and innovation, and confront challenging issues for the benefit of society. • Location Executive Office National Academy of Sciences Building 2101 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20418, United States • Membership Scientists, engineers, and health professionals • The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), also known as the National Academies, is a congressionally chartered organization that serves as the collective scientific national academy of the United States-. These esteemed institutions provide independent, objective advice to inform policy decisions, ignite progress and innovation, and address complex challenges for the betterment of society-. Let's delve into their significant contributions: • National Academy of Sciences (NAS): • the NAS iz a prestigious organization that recognizes outstanding scientific achievements across various fields, including the physical, biological, social, and medical sciences. Packet Pg. 249 9.1.f Evaluation of Red -Light Came Publication Type: Technical Report Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-05-048 Abstract: The objective of this final study was to determine the effectiveness of red -light -camera (RLC) systems in reducing crashes. The study used empirical Bayes before -and -after research using data from seven jurisdictions across the United States at 13: treatment sites. The purpose of the study was to estimate the crash and associated economic effects of RLC systems and specially derived rear end and right-angle unit crash costs for various severity levels. Crash effects detected were consistent in direction with those found in many previous studies: decreased right-angle crashes and increased rear end ones. The economic analysis examined the extent to which the increase in rear end crashes negates the benefits for right-angle crashes. The analysis showed an aggregate crash cost benefit of RLC systems. A disaggregate analysis found that the greatest economic benefits are associated with the highest total entering average annual daily traffic, the largest ratios of right-angle to rear crashes, and with the presence of protected left turn phases. There were weak indications of a spillover effect that points to a need for a more definitive, perhaps prospective, study of this issue. Publishing Date: April 2005 Author(s): Council, Forrest Persaud, Bhagwant Eccles, Kim Lyon, Criag Publishing Office: Office of Safety Research and Development FHWA Program(s): Safety Research AMRP Program(s): Safety Data and Analysis FHWA Activities: Highway Safety Information System Subject Area: Safety and Human Factors U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration 1200 NEW JERSEY AVENUE, SE WASHINGTON, DC 20590 202-366-4000 Packet Pg. 250 fill j - 4t' ss it dip The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) is an independent, nonprofit scientific and educational organization dedicated to reducing deaths, injuries and property damage from motor vehicle crashes through research and evaluation and through education of consumers, policymakers and safety professionals. The Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) shares and supports this mission through scientific studies of insurance data representing the human and ;conomic losses resulting from the ownership and operation of different types of vehicles and by publishing insurance loss results by vehicle make and nodel. 3oth organizations are wholly supported by An IIHS-HLDI resource for students and teaches Newsletter archive 9.1.f A Safety and Health Research Forum A Joint Publication of the National Safety Council The Journal of Safety Research is a multidisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of scientific evidence in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and ... National Safety Council Inin MCC $3220 Article publishing charge for open access 12 days Time to first decision 180 days Review time 294 days Submission to acceptance 30 June 2021 View all special issues and article collections ViOIAI all icci icc Print ISSN: 0022-4375 Online ISSN: 1879-1247 Copyright © 2024 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved For authors Resources for authors Track your accepted paper Journal_Finder Researcher -Academy Rights and permissions Journal Article u iPT fishing Support Center For editors Resources for editors Publishing Ethics Resource Kit Guest editors For reviewers Resources for reviewers Reviewer recognition All content on this site: Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, Al training, and similar technologies. for all open access content, the Creative Commons ,Icensln9 t—,ppiy M a U . ns; 4o National Safety Council Packet Pg. 252 9.1.f T NMDI P R NA TIONA I RAR O MEDICINE N M An official website of the United States government C O I C T A NC II NMT N D 223224M C C P M I A 2 24 N MI R P Intramural research at NLM consists of the development and application of computational approaches to a broad range of problems in biomedicine, molecular biology, and health. READ RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS I MEET OUR PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS I EXPLORE TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894 Web Policies FOIA NLM NIH HHS USA.gov Packet Pg. 253 All fatal crashes at signalized intersections in 14 cities that terminated cameras programs during 2010-14 were 30 and 16 percent higher, respectively, after cameras were turned off than would have been expected had cameras remained ©1996-2023, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute, 501(c)(3) organizations Effects of turning on and off red IigLht cameras on fatal crashes in large U.S. cities Hu, Wen I Cicchino, Jessica B. Journal of Safety Research June 2017 Introduction: Although numerous studies have demonstrated that automated enforcement reduces red light running, a growing number of communities have deactivated their [ed_ 2 camera programs in recent years This study updates estimates of the effects of turning on cameras and offers a first look at the effects of turning them off Method: Among the 117 large U S cities with more than 200,000 residents in 2014, trends in citywide per capita rates of fatal red light running crashes and of all fatal crashes at intersections were compared among 57 cities that initiated camera programs during 1992-2014 and 33 cities without cameras during this period to examine the effects of activating camera programs Trends also were compared between 19 cities that turned off cameras and 31 regionally matched cities with continuous camera programs to evaluate the effects of terminating camera programs Because several cities turned cameras off during 2005-08, the estimated effects might have been confounded by the U.S economic downturn immediately afterward The primary analyses were limited to the 14 cities that turned off cameras during 2010-14 and compared trends in the 14 cities with those in 29 regionally matched cities with continuous camera programs Poisson regression was used to examine the relationship of activating and deactivating camera programs with fatal crash rates Results: After controlling for temporal trends in annual fatal crash rates, population density, and unemployment rates, rates of fatal red light running crashes and of all fatal crashes at signalized intersections in cities with cameras programs were 21 and 14 percent lower, respectively. after cameras were turned on than what would have been expected without cameras Rates of fatal red light running crashes and of all fatal crashes at signalized intersections in 14 cities that terminated cameras programs during 2010-14 were 30 and 16 percent higher, respectively, after cameras were turned off than would have been expected had cameras remained Increases in rates of fatal red light running crashes (18%) and of all fatal crashes at signalized intersections (8%) in all 19 cities that turned cameras off were not significant Conclusions: The current study adds to the body of existing research indicating that red light cameras can reduce the most serious crashes and is the first to demonstrate that kerminating camera programs increases fatal crashes Practical applications: Communities interested in improving intersection safety should consider this evidence Legislators and communities thinking about terminating camera programs should consider the impact to safety if programs end Packet Pg. 254 9.1.f Effects of red light running camera systems installation and then deactivation on intersection safety Munehoon Ko=, Srinivas Reddc Gccdinalls=: Troy Duane Walden-, Robert Carl Wunderl[ch' Affiliations and Abstract Introduction: The primary objective of this paper is to evaluate the safety impacts of red-light running camera (RLC) system installation and then deactivation at 48 intersections in Houston, Texas. The second objective is to evaluate the spillover effect at nearby non -treated intersections in Houston after the deactivation. Methods: To accomplish study objectives, an Empirical Bayes (EB) before -after analysis was used. Results: The results indicate statistically significant collision reductions on all red-light running (RLR) crash types (37 percent) as well as right-angle RLR crashes (47 percent) at the treated intersections after RLC activation. By way of comparison, the RLC deactivation analysis indicated that crashes increased by 20 percent for all RLR crash types and by 23 percent in right-angle RLR crashes at the formerly treated intersections. After deactivation, all severity RLR crashes increased more than expected at nearby non - treated intersections, which indicates the possibility of an adverse spillover effect. However, fatal/injury crashes associated with rear -end decreased after deactivation at both formerly treated and non -treated intersections, although those rear -end crashes account for smaller proportions when compared to all crash types/right-angle crashes. Practical applications: Overall, removing RLC treatments results in a negative reaction to the safety benefits that the treatment provides when it is in place and actively working and to the nearby intersections where the treatment has not been implemented. This study helps define the effects that RLCs have on safety at signalized intersections after installation and deactivation. The results indicate statistically significant collision reductions on all red-light running (RLR) crash types (37 percent) as well as right-angle RLR crashes (47 percent) at the treated intersections after RLC activation Packet Pg. 255 9.1.f Effects of refit camera enforcement on red light violations in Arlington County, Virginia McCartt, Anne T. I Hu, Wen Journal of Safety Research February 2014 Objectives: In June 2010, Arlington County. Virginia, installed red light cameras at four heavily traveled signalized intersections Effects of camera enforcement on red light y tQD5A= examined Methods: Traffic was videotaped during the 1-month warning period and 1 month and 1 year after ticketing began at the four camera intersections, four non -camera "spillover" intersections in Arlington County (two on travel corridors with camera intersections, two on different corridors), and four non -camera "control" intersections in adjacent Fairfax County Logistic regression models estimated changes in the likelihood of violations at camera and spillover intersections. relative to expected likelihood without cameras, based on changes at control intersections. Results: At camera intersections. there were significant reductions 1 year after ticketing in odds of violations occurring at least 0 5 s (39%) and at least 1 5 s (86%) after lights turned red, relative to expected odds without cameras, and a marginally significant 48% reduction in violations occurring at least 1 s into red At non -camera intersections on corridors with camera intersections, odds of violations occurring at least 0 5 s (14%). 1 s (25%). and 1 5 s (63%) into the red phase declined compared with expected odds, but not significantly Odds of violations increased at the non -camera intersections located on other Arlington County travel corridors Conclusions: Consistent with prior research, red light violations at camera -enforced intersections declined significantly Reductions were greater the longer after the light turned red, when violations are more likely to cause crashes. Spillover benefits were observed only for nearby intersections on travel corridors with cameras and were not always significant Practical application: This evaluation examined the first year of Arlington County's red light camera program, which was modest in scope and without ongoing publicity A larger. more widely publicized program is likely needed to achieve community -wide effects. Consistent with prior research, red light violations at camera - enforced intersections declined significantly. Reductions were greater the longer after the light turned red, when violations are more likely to cause crashes. • 01996-2023, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute, 501(c)(3) organizations Packet Pg. 256 9.1.f Red-light cameras for the prevention of road traffic crashes A S Aeron-Thomas . S He„ Abstract Background: Road crashes are a prime cause of death and dudbil and red-light running is a common cause of crashes at b lam, intersections. Red-light cameras are increasingly used to promote compliance with traffic signals Manual enforcement methods are resource intensive and high risk, whereas red-light cameras can operate 24 hours a day and do not involve high- speed pursuits. Obiectives: To quantify the impact of red-light cameras on the incidence and severity of road crashes and casualties, and the incidence of red-light violations. Search strategy: We searched the following electronic databases TRANSPORT (NTIS, TRIS, IRRD,TRANSDOC), Cochrane Injuries Group 5g=d�Register, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Australian Transport Index. We checked the reference lists of relevant papers and contacted research and advocacy 9%0,0 A"i Selection criteria: Rd or quasi -controlled trials and controlled before -after studies of red-light cameras. For crash impact evaluation, the before and after periods each had to be at least one year in length. For violation studies, the after period had to occur at least one year after camera installation. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted data on study type, charactenstics of camera and control areas, and data collection period. Before -after data were collected on number of crashes by severity, collision type, deaths and injuries, and red-light violations. Rate ratio was calculated for each study Where there was more than one, rate ratios were pooled to give an overall estimate, using a generic inverse variance method and a random -effects model Main results: No (Ap0 controlled trials were identified but 10 controlled before -after studies from Australia, Singapore and the USA met our inclusion criteria. Authors' conclusions: Red-light cameras are effective in total casualty crashes. reducing Packet Pg. 257 9.1.f 1 TRIDthe TRIS and ITRD database EVALUATION OF RED LIGHT CAMERA ENFORCEMENT IN FAIRFAX, VA., USA More than one million crashes occur annually at traffic signals in the United States, and redli htht cameras increasingly are being used to supplement police - enforcement efforts by automatically photographing vehicles whose drivers run red lights. This feature evaluates nine intersections studied in the city of Fairfax, Virginia. Red light camera enforcement in Fairfax was preceded by a 30-day warning period, during which cameras were used to photograph violators, but no tickets were issued. Red light violation data were collected immediately prior to the warning period and then 3 months and one year after enforcement began. Random sample telephone surveys of residents about their awareness and opinions of red light camera enforcement were also conducted approximately one month before and one year after the enforcement program began. One year after enforcement began, violation rates were lower at all camera and noncamera sites. Overall reductions at the five camera sites were 7% 3 months after enforcement began and 44% after one year. Overall reductions at the two noncamera sites were 14% after 3 months and 34% after one year. The overall violation rate at the control sites essentially was unchanged. Public support for camera use increased from 75% before enforcement to 84% one year after enforcement. Corporate Authors: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Washington, DC United States • Authors: o Retting, R A o Williams, A F o Farmer, C M o Feldman, A F • Publication Date: 1999-8 One year after enforcement began, violation rates were lower at all camera and noncamera sites. Overall reductions at the five camera sites were 7% 3 months after enforcement began and 44% after one year. Packet Pg. 258 9.1.f Safety Evaluation of Red -Light Cameras. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration XII. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Red-light running at signalized intersections is a significant problem in the United States; it results in more than 95,000 crashes and approximately 1,000 deaths per year. Red -light -camera systems aimed at reducing this problem have become a popular tool in local jurisdictions. Their use has not been without controversy, primarily related to the use of private firms to implement the program, and questions concerning changes in signal timing during program implementation. Part of the controversy has stemmed from the lack of sound research concerning the effects of RLCs on intersection crashes. Many studies of RLC effectiveness were conducted in jurisdictions outside the United States, and most of the U.S. and non-U.S. studies have experienced methodological problems, as was documented by the critical review of literature conducted in this effort. This current study was an attempt to overcome these methodological issues and to examine the crash -related effects in multiple U.S. jurisdictions to see if consistent results were found AAat using the same methodology, "fine and points" was found to be associated with a greater benefit than "fine only." In summary, the multijunsdictional database deY ed and the crash - based and economic analyses used made it possible to answer most of the questions posed by FHWA. This economic analysis represents the first attempt in the known literature to combine the positive effects of right-angle crash reductions with the negative effects of rear end crash increases, and to identify factors that might further enhance the effects of RLC systems Larger crash sample sizes would have added even more information The following primary conclusions are based on these current analyses • Even though the positive effects on right-angle crashes of RLC systems is partially offset by negative effects related to increases in rear end crashes, there is still a modest to moderate economic benefit of between $39,000 and $50,000 per treated site year, depending on whether one examines only injury crashes or includes PDOs, and on whether the statistically non -significant shift to slightly more severe right-angle crashes remaining after treatment is, in fact, real. • Even if modest, this economic benefit is important. In many instances today, the RLC systems pay for themselves through red -light -running fines generated. However, in many jurisdictions, this differs from most safety treatments where there are installation, maintenance, and other costs that must be weighed against the treatment benefits. • The modest benefit per site is an average over all sites. As the analysis of factors that impact showed, this benefit can be increased through careful selection of the sites to be treated (e.g., sites with a high ratio of right-angle to rear end crashes as compared to other potential treatment sites) and program design (e.g., high publicity, signing at both intersections and jurisdiction limits) Similar in direction but somewhat smaller in magnitude than those indicated in past studies. Right-angle crashes (the surrogate for "red-light running" crashes) decrease significantly and rear end crashes increase Similar in direction but somewhat smaller in magnitude than those indicated in past studies. Right-angle crashes (the surrogate for "red-light running" crashes) decrease significantly Packet Pg. 259 9.1.f Reductions in injury crashes associated with red light camera enforcement in Oxnard, California Retting, Richard A. l KyUgbjWI Q. Sergey Y. Amencan Joumal of Public Hea;,'� November 2002 Objectives: This study estimated the impact of red light camera enforcement on motor vehicle crashes in one of the first US communities to employ such cameras — Oxnard, California. Methods: Crash data were analyzed for Oxnard and for 3 comparison cities. Changes in crash frequencies were compared for Oxnard and control cities and for signalized and nonsicinalized intersections by means of a generalized linear regression model. Results: Overall, crashes at signalized intersections throughout Oxnard were reduced by 7% and injury crashes were reduced by 29%. Right-angle crashes. those most associated with red light violations, were reduced by 32%; right-angle crashes involving injuries were reduced by 68%. Conclusions: Because red light cameras can be a permanent component of the transportation infrastructure, crash reductions attributed to camera enforcement should be sustainable. Overall, crashes at signalized intersections throughout Oxnard were reduced by 7% and injury crashes were reduced by 29%. Right-angle crashes, those most associated with red light violations, were reduced by 32%; right-angle crashes involving injuries were reduced by 68%. Because red light cameras can be a permanent component of the transportation infrastructure, crash reductions attributed to camera enforcement should be sustainable. Packet Pg. 260 9.1.f • or s nig (Assoc! ww. g h %cm • • Pedestrian 2021 PRELIMINARY DATA k)h y (January- December) • Automated traffic enforcement ion (particularly speed enforcement), while controversial, has irrefutably led 'firg to reductions in motorist speeds and crashes. A literature review of studies Ole evaluating speed cameras concluded that all studies measuring speed or speeding saw reductions when the cameras were present.31 • 31. Cecilia, W., Charlene, W., Joan, H. K., Le Brocque, R., & Bellamy, N. (2010, November 10). Speed cameras for the prevention of road traffic injuries and deaths. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CDO04607.pub4 32 Packet Pg. 261 Pedestrian Fatalities on the Rise in Washington State Washington State sees a high number of pedestrian fatalities on its roads every year. Even though lawmakers have to reduce traffic - related deaths, our numbers have continued to claim. Pedestrians continue to be vulnerable road users, with nothing to protect them from the force of a colliding vehicle. 9.1.f 2 P 2 22 T D 2 2 0 T M DOT How Many Pedestrian Fatalities are There in Washington? More than 100 pedestrians are killed by motorists every year in Washington State. However, that does not paint the full picture of the hundreds of additional pedestrians who are struck and seriously injured on our roads. Not to mention, the lives of families and friends impacted by each victim. Packet Pg. 263 9.1.f 2008 Red -Light Cameras Is -a p proves-tria I-ru n-of-red-light-cam eras/ = Q � 51*F HeraldNet Tuesday, February 20, 2024 EVERETT. WAENINGTON Local news Sports Food & Drink Life Business Opinion Obituaries Classifieds Edmonds approves trial run of red -light cameras By Chris Fyall For The Herald Friday. September 19.2008 9:37pm EDMON DS LOCAL NEWS 00000 EDMONDS — First they were in Seattle, then Lynnwood, then almost everywhere — Issaquah, Puyallup, Spokane — and now red-light cameras appear headed to Edmonds, at least on a trial basis. The city approved this week the installation of trial cameras at three busy intersections in south Edmonds. The intersections are at Highway 99 at 22oth Street SW, Highway 99 at 238th Street SW and Edmonds Way at both Avenue W. If the city ultimately installs the cameras, red-light violators would be subject to $124 fines. There need to be 1.2 violations daily in each direction to justify permanent cameras, Assistant Police Chief Gerry Gannon said. Packet Pg. 264 9.1.f 2008 Red -Light Cameras Sign In _ 51*F Herald cell Tuesday, February 20,2024 O U Local news Sports Food 8 Drink Life Business Opinion Ubrtuaries Classifieds Jobs Marketplace All sections L y E fC U "There are probably a lot of near -misses at those intersections that we don't even know about," he said. d W Not everybody is in favor of the cameras. For instance, some believe the cameras are used to help cities increase revenue. a� v .o Lynnwood, for example, raised $1.i million in red-light violations in the d first six months after it installed 12 cameras last summer. Seattle also has to raised millions in violations revenue. O M That isn't Edmonds' priority, council member Deanna Dawson said. W Some nearby cities, including Mill Creek and Mountlake Terrace, have ' considered the cameras, but found they didn't want them, or that drivers p didn't run enough red lights. That could happen in Edmonds, too. "Going through the survey is an important thing to do," Edmonds Mayor c N Gary Haakenson said in August. "We may actually find out that we do not L have a problem." d In Edmonds, the test cameras would be installed and monitored by d American Traffic Solutions, the same company that has installed cameras in E Lynnwood. v If an intersection warrants a permanent camera, the city would have to Q approve the final installation, but ATS would install and monitor it for free. ATS' fee is more than $4,000 per camera, but the company takes that .earn Packet Pg. 265 9.1.f 2008 Red -Light Cameras .m/news/edmonds-approves-trial-ru n-of-red-light-cameras/ Q 51'F &ral&et Sign In Tuesday, February 20, 2024 EYEE[TT, wALNINOTOM e1 - Local news Sports Food & Drink Life Business Opinion Obituaries Classifieds Jobs Marketplace All sections The trial will take place within the next month, officials said. It could be 2OO9 before permanent cameras are installed, Gannon added. Advocates believe the cameras increase safety at dangerous intersections. "If you have a crash in the middle of an intersection, it is usually because somebody was not paying attention to the traffic signal," Edmonds Police Chief Al Compaan said. "I don't think there's any question that at those intersections where cameras are installed, people are better at taking the traffic signals seriously." Each of the intersections getting a camera in Edmonds has averaged about one right-angle collision a year, said Bertrand HaUSs, a traffic engineer with the city. Thev eet crowded durine rush hour, and drivers uush the limits, Hauss told The City suggested cameras at three busy intersections including: • Highway 99 and 220th • Highway 99 and 238th • Edmonds Way and 100th 16 years later... Packet Pg. 266 9.1.f 2023 Data: Hot off the Press Although pedestrian involved collisions represented a low number of parking lot collisions, the overall number of pedestrian related collisions in 2023 increased. The table below categorizes pedestrian related collisions into 6 locations for each trimester of 2023. 1 2 3 Tota I Parking Lots 3 1 4 8 H WY 99 0 1 2 1 3 H WY 104 1 0 0 1 HWY 524 0 2 0 1 2 Downtown 1 0 4 5 Other 1 1 3 10 14 Total 6 8 19 The total number of pedestrian related collisions for the first two trimesters are typical of previous years. However. the total number of pedestrian related collisions in the third trimester is over 3 times more than it was in 2022 (6) and almost 2 times as much as 2021 (10). Since 2020, there was a significant decrease in pedestrian related collisions. However. the totals for 2023 resemble pre -pandemic numbers with 22 total collisions in 2018 and 28 total collisions in 2019. Packet Pg. 267 9.1.f Vehicle vs. Pedestrian Collisions by Year 3,-) 30 ;.) 2U 1 10 S 0 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Packet Pg. 268 201Q 202u 2021 2022 2023 9.1.f The last data set that I analyzed was intersection collisions. There were 204 collisions that occurred in intersections in 2023. There were many intersections that had multiple collisions. but some of the more prevalent locations are as follows: HWY 99 and 220th St. SW 7q HWY 99 and 228th S HWY 104 and 240th St. SW 220th St. SW and 76th Ave W 6 220th St. SW and 100th Ave W/9th Ave S 6 212th St SW and 72nd Ave W 212Mt. SW and 76thARv6reW 228th St. SW and Main St. and 9th Ave 13 The locations highlighted in red are locations that are controlled by traffic signals. while the locations highlighted in gray are controlled by stop signs (in at least one direction). Further discussion with the City's traffic engineer will be needed in order to identify if there is an engineering adjustment that can be made for these locations. However, one adjustment that can be made for the locations in red are the implementation of red light cameras. There are multiple studies that have been done that support the positive impact that red light cameras have on decreasing the number of violations, which lead to intersection related collisions. I believe that these could be a benefit at these intersections, as well as a few others that may not have the collision data to support it, but have a high volume of pedestrian traffic and a high volume of complaints about drivers running red lights (such as HWY 104 and Dayton St.). Packet Pg. 269 4, Costs and Offsets of a Red -Light Camera Program 9.1.f Are the costs of the camera offset or will they cost the city additional money? • VERRA charges $5000 per camera per month • Seven cameras would be $35,000 total per month • Court costs: Monthly 2475 tickets=$17,859 + $5000 (est. cost $24,900 per month) 2475 tickets a month would be 82.5 a day= 11 per camera, per day. • Court costs: Monthly 1680 tickets $16,722 + $5000 (est. cost $21,700 per month) 1680 tickets per month would be 56 tickets a day= 8 per camera, per day. • Police costs are currently neutral. • 2,475 tickets per month x $130 average fine = $321,000 •-$241900 costs • $262,000 delta in the positive per month • (A year: $3,144,000) • 1680 tickets per month x $130 average fine=$262,000 •-$21,700 costs • $229,300 delta in the positive • (A year: $2,751,600) Packet Pg. 271 9.1.f What is the impact related to court costs? • Individuals who request a hearing may choose whether to appear in -person or remotely. • IRLJ 2.6 requires that hearings be set within 120 days from the date of the notice of infraction. • These hearings take place from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. • Current calendars allow for 80 pro se infraction hearings per month. • Typically, ten infraction hearings are scheduled per hour, which provides an average of six minutes per hearing. Packet Pg. 272 Workload impact assuming (1) 2,475 red light citations per month; and (2) 1,680 red light citations per month. Assuming 2,475 red light citations each month with 18.5% of individuals cited requesting a hearing, this will result in an additional 458 infraction hearings per month. The increase in hearings would require Edmonds Municipal Court to move from infractions being held on two days per month to 13.5 days per month. . • Assuming 2,475 citations per month, Edmonds Municipal Court estimates that the increased Court Clerk workload from red light cameras would require an additional two to three FTEs. • The annual salary of a Court Clerk at Step One is $65,184. Including benefits, the total annual cost for one Court Clerk is $84,739. • This would result in a monthly cost per Court Clerk of $7,061. • If two additional Court Clerks were needed, the monthly cost would be $14,122. • If three additional Court Clerks were needed, the monthly cost would be $21,183. • Additional capacity could be created by increasing the pro tempore judge budget and bringing in an additional judicial officer to preside over additional calendars. • This would result in an estimated additional cost of $3,737 per month. • Assuming 2,475 citations per month, Edmonds Municipal Court estimates that its increased monthly costs would be between $17,859 and $24,920 9.1.f Packet Pg. 274 9.1.f • Assuming a total of 1,680 citations per month with 18.5% of individuals cited requesting a hearing, this will result in an additional 311 infraction hearings per month. • This is a 389% increase in the number of infractions hearings that Edmonds Municipal Court conducts each month. • The increase in hearings would require Edmonds Municipal Court to move from infractions hearings being held two days per month to 10 days per month. • Additional capacity could be created by increasing the pro tempore judge budget and bringing in an additional judicial officer to preside over additional calendars. This would result in an estimated additional cost of $2,600 per month. • Assuming 1,680 citations per month, Edmonds Municipal Court estimates that the increased Court Clerk workload from red light cameras would require an additional 2 FTEs. Edmonds Municipal Court estimates that its increased monthly costs would be $16,722. Packet Pg. 275 • Conservatively, based on conversations with Lynnwood PD, it takes approximately one minute to view three tickets. • In speaking with the Edmonds traffic sergeant, this workload would be split up among multiple officers, thereby minimizing the workload and staying current with the volume. • The infraction that is sent to the violator with a picture of the violation, the steps on how to respond to the infraction, and a hyperlink to view a video of the violation online. • The steps on how to respond to the infraction are decided upon by the court. • There is a boiler plate narrative from police on each ticket. • 2,475 tickets per month, divided by 3 tickets a minute, is 825 minutes a month (or 13.75 hours a month). • 1680 tickets per month, divided by 3 tickets a minute, is 560 minutes a month (or 9.3 hours a month). 9.1.f Packet Pg. 276 Options and Recommendations Red Light Camera Program 9.1.f Packet Pg. 277 9.1.f Pilot Program Red -Light Camera Sites: Three Intersections 1. 220t" and Highway 99: 5.3 (10 accidents) 20,000 cars per day 1. One approach :16101U1 1,1P.11116 MIN [o • • 2. 212t" and 76t" : 4.08 (15 accidents) 6000 cars per day 1. Three approaches 3. Hwy 104 and 100t" : 3.5 (six accidents) 13,000 cars per day 1. Three approaches Thre'71Mtersect�1,680 potential citations Packet Pg. 278 Install Cameras at six Highway 99 intersections an three additional high accident intersections: Nine intersections total • 224t" and Highway 99: 12 Accidents, 16,000 cars per day • 220t" and Highway 99: 11 Accidents, 20,000 cars per day • 238t" and Highway 99: Five Accidents, 20,000 cars per day • • • • 216t" and Highway 99: Five Accidents, 20,000 cars per day Option 2 • 228t" and Highway 99: Three Accidents, 16,000 cars per day • 212t" and Highway 99: Two Accidents, 20,000 cars per day • 2201" and 761": 13 Accidents, 12,000 cars per day • 2121" and 761": 15 Accidents, 6000 cars per day • Highway 104 and 1001": Six Accidents, 13,000 cars per day Nine Intersections 2,475 potential citations Packet Pg. 279 9.1.f 0 • Install red-light cameras at three Highway 99 intersections and three non -highway 99 intersections. Six intersectiM2,077 potential citations Packet Pg. 280 Nrnnn The proposed red-light camera enforcement systems (assuming approval and agreement modification) will take several months into 2024 to engineer, install, and incorporate into the eco-system we are currently designing for school zone cameras. I For 2024, best case scenario is having cameras operational by July, so for the remaining six months of the year they would be functional. The proposal is to install red light cameras at determined high accident risk intersections. 9.1.f �•l 1 f*] „l 1=00 1 1 f / eographic U 0 As 2 N� I.f. d :.i O a O E W Packet Pg. 282 Economic and Geographic Differencesin camera placement = A Camera violations do not distinguish gender, economic status, race, etc. Most Highway 99 traffic is through traffic travelling through the city to other destinations. Highway 104 and 100t" would potentially capture those heading to the ferry or living in the Edmonds Bowl. 212tn/220tn and 76t" captures a more residential area of Edmonds and high school traffic. Income by Location Use the dropdown to filter by race/ethnicity. RACUETHNICITY Total HIGHEST MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME (TOTAL) 1. Census Tract 506 2. Census Tract 503 3. Census Tract 502 In 2021, the place with the highest Median Household Income (Total) in Edmonds, WA was Census Tract 506 with a value of S191,250, followed by Census Tract 503 and Census Tract 502, with respective values of S152,613 and S131,136. The following map shows all of the places in Edmonds, WA colored by their Median Household Income (Total). Data from the Census Bureau ACS 5-year Estimate. 0 ❑a ston View Data Save Image 4 Aountlakc Share / Embed Add Data to Cart Aiderwood Manor Mill Crcck North Cry O OpenStreetMap contributors. © CARTO Median Household Income $40.9k - $69.8k $69.9k - $92.2k $92.2k - $124k 0 $125k - $190k E $191 k+ 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Packet Pg. 284 Citation Information g Packet Pg. 285 Pa�4 DECLARATION OF NON -RESPONSIBILITY Complete the Declaration of Non Responsibility If you wero not the driver. This Doctanfnm may no1 be used by amployors/pnncipals to he"fal.spons,NNy b their emptuyaeslagents. As a mane, of law. a vehicle ,egistared 10 an empby"lo"crpal that Is tlriven by an employee remains h the "cam, custody, aM mnhol' a/ the ampbyer/agent and thus, file empbye,/pnncrpal is responsrbla To, the payment of the penalty. Notice Number: Liens. Plata Number: State: I received the above-releranced Notice of Inhactlon. At the time of Mindu e Aollrbon llld In the Notice of Infraction, the vehlcla described In the Notice as ( I Stolen () Sold I I In the care, custody, or control of another person Tno statement —, rebuts the prasumptmn of 1 ad q Vou may also provide the loeovnng Infor—bon to confirm espors:blity a odice repUn (,electing the vehicle was elites). Report of Sale from the DepaUhhent of Licenairag (mnecting that the vehde was sad). or the person ITIO had care, custodyor co,"i of the vehhde at the lime of the violation Driver's Name' _ Drlver'a Address: CityState ZIP I declare under penalty of perjury ,it,, the limn of this State of Washington that the Information provided In this Declaration is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signed this_ day of (month)_(year) at (cly state) Print your name Telephone N—I,ar your street address Coy. State ZIP Return the Completed and signed Declararon Lynnwood Municlpal Court 19321 Oath Ave W Lynnwood, WA 98036 STATEMENT OF DECLARATION FOR HEARING BY MAIL Thu following le my wines statement for my mitigation or contested hearing. PUT—: to IRLJ 3 5(a I(4) there can be, n. appr:rl Irn,- a tletSirn o^ a written statammmt I declare under penalty of ,jury under the laws of the State of Washington that the IMnrm rtion provided! in this declaaion UT true and cor t Io the bast of my knowledge. Dated thls_day of ,2_., (city, state) Signals. NIraai$rawl LYNNWOOD MUNICIPAL COURT Pege3 Hearing Request Form Automstad Traffic S." Canon IOU uUST RESPOND TO T.s iglKE aF INFRAGMIH WRHH THIRTY-THREE 111) all OF ns DATE TTIE HOME WAs YAIFD. wihee nsperrss raaral M alai Ilesmra,ssel na rm Mn mdngM m M ssy Or reeaPsae 4 em. REQUEST FOR HEARINGNm : < Dw.on recalwy • Pea Mecca, Mxb w eassme by r soory ra bale, so* mnrns They m.Dwd b M more oy miw nr renew Thal Ym ,mud t a ine a .umm . DM.,.ssn a 1MRppaIMRy. Thar mavn a «raw w aver : ,i irw+wooawa a«.ears. to may ,.,Dina a ,Maweer m.X. Dw.w wl.r m M mmm cum raaw M dwraam win m M iw,A a re Da9a ..ma you woub IiM io rave a Mwiy. yin msy m9unl ahMr a MInWlION HEnNING a • LONIESTED HEAR,NO WbsHwa hw.cn A asfiriM Ebbw. S�M4rmtT!uttpaucm ML wGwid H far sew am mpoms. Mara ras LYmweea YrlDW coral erwaan a:]a AY.rd aim Pr w I.el1 noamo. MIIaIAITON MlAPoNG pN PERaON): B Psrwn aMraefd)]aa®T, you span m app.rt a ynur acnMura rwnry a that you w r emlrW b Nw ronuMwe M iNr.,em. Vou ^W rsN neNeoa wNMaa b M M.nry Vm warb rawwH • 'n:Mann I yin qa. you cwmia M ssr.ctm Y- Euh OW+e M amrntrcw mry Ee .W, is is ran rm reaucs or www M Danny vm w. rmtawP n n^uO a Your miaassn hrmk9 en.. Ym inn a:err M neersie R.msn rawwr Sabaasuamn—aa Ibsave Dmrya.m DTanLynrwaoem.e«rmwL aay0A111IlN YeMaaO My aua- Y --Aw; selme a.vaa.ro n moil You Mve M ogion a. MawaaeOaaer (sty mr l ef.a): Ym w w a rerAea b rpa b mrt aWa, sh mug mngrr • Dha.114snf. 6Wemerh rb DaJw.em .ra nre M mirm b M .diar blow. TN errs w .dew yaw awrraere rearr Rim ay eltrlrmss. M I IN, dNaYa awwn atar.m R, 1M DlmmeYnn a M .l ilr aar.1. w r bW mnnae.e ad •misty raises w s aNlmewd TM MPT m« ,mum M Darra.r e.Daiwy m rry mxgmy draxlwuree. Ths coon w maa.4edaon.d yin w a miss b rriq aThe kme.'. fairy.. CMWSTED HeAfrG ON Pang At a masked bes" M CPr va me 0.rssn a —N by . DNmnssrwvo a M evdawe em M ns.caon aaha rmhaa vm m« rRI—arum. YW Wii M am r — n.uM tM maa a Mrctm Vw w M — in w" a yw, —ve you mrsr«wrM Munro Reeser ra.Pon Esbs w wMM—r salmvnlmrepecumDWwatLrwwamwe.am— cONT MO HGLRehG (BY MAILI: li,.re4 a sDDsaar n mot you Mrs M PDEm a • -Naas Mercy (W mu.nr. ): y u w w r mus4 b amaar in ,inn. Inr mur cw.w. D—. suwmm .d Dedsbn ham cues, b M Lyo:wmo wish, Cowl TN cw- w nor« yore aecurmo., wvd.r.r �«.ry a1.Nirisnb. M DDer arch. pan am«rwv and M Ivm--- a M ,,ties. Tne — wr maw uI bcem r •+ir,Daearra+Ea iwar.en..iaiyaMliro.'. nrame.. TTraamheN m.DDwowna mmna.ar wrN.wa Er w..in... Vcu con aMa M hearse Rawma cwaon Eapw a auMM--sayy b rn rmdape and Dior r LywNooaeapwrmn io aDDar tar . rsmmse MMYg w Irua b PaY . Dorsal' rieo.aa aM • liaaisN wa muX m your Hoa'ca a henxsm iwne ,re,wa ro e na agM:ET, seeNMW Dariaaes pw ,oreraan wa. w be eoasa b M D Taevd Irn.Ih F DaY. a hill o,. to p .mr r . rs9r.l hsrsie. mw hisaa m This rwr craw ware.faElabasae r.aewtr.rirw ara..a n... 1a Ewn..U.Md. r. ns.er rmwmww. ra.X..e. M.ar.ss a r,ry woes em w.aow wmw. mawn.rwawr,.am raw.mm. w.•wers+ir_w.+a. NAME: Itr2021 IrmrYwrrmxrwbwsr niYra�paawari NOTN;E e: 035230p300915 VERSION: 1 „ip6Rp23 3a..rs,+.seWrwa w�p PLATE: c-El 4 STATE: WA amrar,s�m: a HEMMG COUPON Lynnwood Municipal Court 19321 44th Ave W Lynnwood. WA 98036 rgu rar Raven No uTr T1fM1 aaONMR ON al ryas THE eta an al lllt#ONf aTlr IIOIIgL rm r h W rrr r ar Raaw r aakrm eMsa a aeaa a w. era ta. Nasae r arYL err ilMarw a✓iYl. eaaaws a.IIA assss — wa a srs s.aa:e rn. qss it saw — cur sr .mina awn rasa sw a .arw aai.Y wawa, Nnr/:w I---.. mri w.lerasaa a- be- rrrra.Mssr rwa.harbna mgaLRawme A.w rwhr l... as srs eimmr sssra araswa.r r a.amd s.a,.shsw wa.aa aeirav mr O►rLPawese ws wa.h fossHe 1Lle.rws M a..rmi a taarmrarsrYa.... w—McM.malaii ar«ws. nrr.a rrrarle as as,weed.,., mire aIm s.«amimrsa a sew are asgerm arrr saMk as rheaaeo.. w�ewr rcuM.m Mrarwr..areassMrwW.1r.we•al=rPa.MasIwsassewaLwraaaaa ne wIaanWawaalrwltYrhamaMws.r.sreaamaraweaM.wareesam ssw �s.,-ward a is esi.ss•:..awre:tiimw.nr»mr.rs.wWw.rw�anarrIaarl.ab.mrssMWaa.wOsbcrdaaw.lIbyatwbrNhr..warwMa1r/ah..ww.maaaa.,ne.Mwr..Wmm eai..avT.aumr.irarWInliskaerararasagarMwbsswwa-maarfb.aaIwwMrremab. wssse•w wrrla. waMawrayb.wsrrahmma.rbiWa.nriERWwecM1aWDw.ararra+.aararMa.ra9asbmwM unansrRpMeawerr rtiwaigw rvaerrsa0 e.lrmaaaawb.rgr.araRr.LwWa:,aey. saa.Rebass Aran wanaut's /Ie se-aieor4absawa MSYObawawsga•Llrsalki—i-rrver,� rararrraw xwsleaaW bib irrslMd Irr—Reassess W aarasea keys alcumase. miuraaubnr T baeve nbw aer aw asaar curs im aa,aw n w worm. siwe r.mN ivrriaa. s wmq am mraYA�w WWHmaw Wraarwrrmrmr.rmrYm rMm iarre lssmr, Wabi.wiaw Mvae awcan cur.,:. rp.r�r.rrama Maws srlmrssM. an Yn�aaaq r��aorraMaayaurawMbwawsabsmbmnaFarw rraawpy.v rasasaherr ass airs ewraawnsa.rnnr.aaiwP. nam n n• aa; o.,E o-r....,�.,.. ,. Dw�n< _w :,,.. :. �,w, ramraawar.m>arwaa,o-.o-m«.yam nEysE oo ro+waa seat. rPwn m. wa� a. e. mAmmshse� TIa w.mrmrie w. a.ra m e .y o-a.. abewr bind, rrw. a-n Au m. m w a p e.,n Pm+.a caw mime . wl:, .aa a._,. w tra.n .�ra Par«awi.r+,amTolavo eaD Au b.m Pv rw.. woyn.nM o-.wmam.mmnmw „r. r.qu. a. pq.eea Pan.wr M Lyas.oaa uabgr coin r aair.e m new bnT r rqb �+ Mrs ami am: navrw.N v Aa rsiawa.Ir ear ..r,w r•ian.evy mlwbn a r i. ,aim.ai.,w a ry •^r•v v Pa Mown Pr m.r r sine ar W. b M.w rr aria b Y r yw aw ar a .<ir.iDm,am+aa..Rwo-aarwr.TPww.mi.+ar«rr..Ln..�a,: rmP+�aiam'�'"oa,,.rP%r,.�.e �oym.remni:.n� a ya+ � cur n m Pw. lr a ear.., a n ra a.. rah r I.lr ehoala. .s.0 « ahXy w . O.owwm a Nen.R.yoil.ur hem a ar . b Lrrmma aa.vaaa Cml nor ar GM. r]e1 caw awns . Lyrwml WA.eaM rM rim. as w nrrra aw PuaP,ip. rtl.r.a, rl rpT waurryy.aria in M sore. a . rer a.—.oldmwk.b—. awn..—.m l.=rmrmo—'. o-nar. a fi_. wDwaawy am m r a.rmm a 9.+e b i1EYWYY� w .r . con m p .i. . r. >. ., ..• Ts Packet Pg. 286 Info. L LYNNWOOD w A S H I N G T O N City of Lynnwood, WA REVIEW EVIDENCE Print © Photosensitive Warning: Videos may contain flashes of light that may be harmful to those who have photo sensitivities Click on an icon below to view an image or video associated with your violation EOibitA Exhibit License Plate Video clip 0 Frequently Asked Questions 1111Y23, 12 ac : hone ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 4 R � Hearing Request Pay Your Declaration of Non- Form Infraction Responsibility Form Need to talk to someone? Get help by phone. 1-866-790-4111 Monday - Friday between the hours of 5:00 am - 5:00 pm (PST) Please direct email inquiries to Info@Vlolationlnfo.com include your Notice a in your a -mail. Copyright 0 2022 Vero Mobility. MI right: q *r d. P,Nscy Policy I Terms L Conditions I cookies Policy I Accessibility Info -,,n Packet Pg. 287 What about School Zones? School Zones In The City • The next document shows the schools within the City. • The schools highlighted in green are the schools currently in the process of getting a camera. • We would have to request the vendor to come out and do a speed study to determine whether that specific school would qualify for a speed camera. • Cameras went up in January • There was 30-day warning period. • Almost 900 warnings were given during that 30-day period • 900 x $130 = $117,000. Five cameras at 5k each = $25,000, assuming highest in city of 2475 citations a month, max cost $24,920 a month, $117,000-$49,920 = $67,080 or I 9.1.f Packet Pg. 289 jx School Zone Times 9.1.f 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 11 B C, H School Zone Times Early Release School Zone Scnocl Address Office Phone Start Time End Time Times Flashing Lights On Off Chase Lake Elementary 21603 84th Ave W 25-431-749 8:40 15:10 11:40 8:10 8:50 15:00 15:30 Edmonds Elementary 1215 Olympic Ave 425-431-7374 3:00 14:30 11:00 7:40 8:10 14:20 14:50 Seavie%v Elementary 8426 188th St. SW 425-431-7383 8:00 14:3C 11:00 7:40 8:10 14:20 14:50 Sherwood Elementary 22901 106th Ave W 425-431-7460 9:20 15:50 11:00 9:00 9:30 15:40 16:10 West ate Elementary 9601 220th St. SW 425-431-7470 8:40 15:10 11:40 8:20 8:90 IL 15:00 15:30 Madrona K-8 9300 236th St. SW 425-431-7979 9:20 15:5C 12:20 9:00 9:30 15:25 16:10 Maplewood K-8 8500 200th St. SW 425-431-7515 9:20 15:50 12:20 9:00 9:30 15:40 16:10 Holy Rosary K-8 770 Aloha St. 425-778-3197 8:10 15:15 Mondays 7:55 8:25 13:30 15:05 15:35 Edmonds-Woodway HS 7600 212th St. SW 425-431-7900 7:20 13:50 10:30 7:00 7:30 13.40 14:10 Scriber Lake HS 23200 100th Ave W 425-431-7270 8:35 14:38 11:32 8:15 8.45 14:28 14:58 Packet Pg. 290 9.1.f End of Presentation "k iiiiillllln Packet Pg. 291 9.1.g November 6, 2023 SLS Report Name SLS Request Type Option N SLS Stage Name 1 2 3 4 Average Daily Traffic Year ADT Count SLS Approval Value Updated AADT Data ADT Source URL Constructable WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete NB SR 99 / Pacific Hwy @ 220th St SW 20,000 2022 3.71 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB SR 99 / Pacific Hwy @ 220th St SW 20,000 2022 3.83 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 220th St SW @ SR 99 / Pacific Hwy F 'r I' 70 11,000 2022 5.3 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete WB 220th St SW @ SR 99 / Pacific Hwy F 14,000 2022 2.85 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible NB 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW 2,500 2022 N/A N/A No WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW 6,000 2022 2.85 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 220th St SW @ 76th Ave W F'I` 'ram 12,000 2022 2.91 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible WB 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW 4 14,000 2022 N/A N/A No WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete NB 100th Ave / 9th Ave S @ Elm Way / 200th St SW 4 8,000 2022 2.81 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB 100th Ave / 9th Ave S @ Elm Way / 200th St SW F 'ram 8,000 2022 2.69 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible EB Elm Way / 200th St SW @ 100th Ave / 9th Ave S F'I` 1,500 2022 N/A N/A No WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible WB Elm Way / 200th St SW @ 100th Ave / 9th Ave S F'i` 4 4,000 2022 N/A N/A No WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete NB 76th Ave W @ 212th Street SW F 'r 6,000 2022 4.08 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible SB 76th Ave W @ 212th Street SW F T 6,000 2022 N/A N/A No WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 212th Street SW @ 76th Ave W 4 61000 2022 3.99 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete WB 212th Street SW @ 76th Ave W F 'j` 4 6,000 2022 4.06 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete NB Hwy 104 @ 100th Ave W F 13,000 2022 3.42 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB Hwy 104 @ 100th Ave W 4 12,000 2022 3.5 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 100th Ave W @ Hwy 104 12,000 2022 3.46 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete WB 100th Ave W @ Hwy 104 F T T4 13,000 2022 3.19 Provided by City Conditional WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB Pacific Hwy / SR 99 @ 212th St SW F T T 4 20,000 2022 3.1 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 212th St SW @ Pacific Hwy / SR 99 4 6,000 2022 2.52 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB Pacific Hwy / SR 99 @ 216th St SW F 'j` 'j` 20,000 2022 3.63 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 216th St SW @ Pacific Hwy / SR 99 4 3,200 2023 2.38 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete NB Pacific Hwy / SR 99 @ 224th St SW F T 16,000 2022 3.41 Provided by City Yes .N _ Q 0 r ca 0 0 J L E M U d U) L a� _ a 0 Q _ 0 0 0 W a� Q: 0 a m W N J U) M N O N L E 0 z w _ m t Q Packet Pg. 292 9.1.g WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB Pacific Hwy / SR 99 @ 224th St. SW F 'j` 16,000 2022 2.52 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 224th St @ SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 F'r N/A (don't have data for that ar N/A 3.82 N/A Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete WB 224th St @ SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 F'j` 3,200 2023 2.66 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete NB SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 @ 228th St SW F 'r 'j` 16,000 2022 4.05 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 @ 228th St SW F 'r 'j` 16,000 2022 2.53 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light N/A Not Constructible EB 228th St SW @ SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 2,000 2023 N/A Provided by City No WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete WB 228th St SW @ SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 2,500 2023 2.73 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete NB SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 @ 238th St SW F 'j` 'j` 20,000 2022 3.91 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete SB SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 @ 238th St SW F 'j` 'j` 4 20,000 2022 4.72 Provided by City Yes WAEDM Red Light 1 Complete EB 238th St SW @ SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 <- �' 1,500 2023 0.73 Provided by City Yes WAEDM iRed Light I 1 Complete JWB 238th St SW @ SW Pacific Hwy / SR 99 1 F'r-> I 1 1 700 1 2023 1 1.591 Provided by City IYes in (SR_104 @ Dayton: State Intersection / Hwy 99 @ 244th: City of Shoreline) Shared intersction between City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood (Lynnwood owns the east side of intersection) Packet Pg. 293 9.1.g Constructability Comments 20' slanted stop bar seperation between L1 and 4; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway, about 100' from the bottom of the slanted stop bar to capture L1 thru 4; 27' slanted stop bar seperation between L1 and 4; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway, about 100' from the bottom of the slanted stop bar to capture L1 thru 4; 16' slanted stop bar seperation between L1 and 3; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after utility pole, about 100' from the bottom of the slanted stop bar to capture L1 thru 3; 20' slanted stop bar seperation between L1 and 3; Approach is uphill, about 9% incline; System placement limitation due to curve and obstruction from utility pole near stop bar driveway, unable to capture RT; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after utility pole, about 100' from the bottom of the slanted stop bar to capture L1 thru 3, LT & ST only; System placement issue, no ADA Clearance; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before utility pole, about 92' from the L2 stop bar to capture L1 & 2; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before utility pole, about 95' from the stop bar to capture L1 & 2; System placement issue due to obstruction from utility poles; other utilities in area; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before utility pole, about 95' from stop bar to capture L1 & 2; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before storm drain, about 95' from stop bar to capture L1 & 2; Do not recommend, no ROW, curved road, approach is on a high slope; Do not recommend, >4' ADA clearance; Utilities in area Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before before light pole, about 95' from stop bar to capture L1 thru 3; System placement issue, not within recommended placement due to driveway and underground utilities; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after, about 122' from stop bar to capture L1 thru 3; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway, about 125' from stop bar to capture L1 thru 3; At min distance from stop bar; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before storm drain, about 100' from stop bar to capture L1 & 2; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder before driveway, about 122' from stop bar to capture L1 thru 3; Slightly curved approach; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder, about 100' from stop bar to capture L1 thru 3; Conditional, Major tree trim; Tree on shoulder obstructing traffic signal; Underground utilities in area; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder, about 100' from stop bar to capture L1 thru 3; 16' slanted stop bar Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway to capture L1 thru 4; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder about 100' from stop bar to capture L1 & 2; 22' slanted stop bar; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder to capture L1 thru 4; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway to capture L1 & 2; 23' slanted stop bar; System placement limitation due to driveway, Unable to capture LT lane; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder, about 102' from stop bar to capture L2 thru 4; Possible tree trim N .y 21 c a c 0 0 0 J M a� M U T 0 L a� c a 0 a c 0 :r 0 0 a� 0 0_ d CO J Cn M N O N W m E am 0 z c d z U 0 r Q Packet Pg. 294 9.1.g 20' slanted stop bar; System placement limitation due to driveway, unable to capture RT lane 4; At max distance; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder right after driveway/before storm drain, about 117' from bottom of LT stop bar to capture L1 thru 3; Goo le earth shows vehicles parked on ROW; No ROW on shoulder; Recommend single pole rear radar on opposite side after driveway, about 100' from the stop bar to capture L1 & 2; 22' slanted stop bar; Single pole rear radar on shoulder after storm drain / before driveway, about 120 from top of the stop bar to capture L1 thru 4; 20mm ANPR required; At max distance; 21' slanted stop bar; Unable to capture RT lane 4 due to driveway; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder right after driveway/before storm drain to capture L1 thru 3; System placement issue due to driveway; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder about 100' from bottom of the stop bar to capture L1 & 2; 27' slanted stop bar/stop bar seperation; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder, about 93' from LT stop bar to capture L1 thru 4; 20mm ANPR required; 17' slanted stop bar; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder about 100' from bottom of the stop bar to capture L1 thru 4; 20mm ANPR required; Bus stop on shoulder; Yielding RT lane 2; single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after bus stop, about 115' from stop bar to capture L1; Single pole rear radar in range on shoulder after driveway, about 110' from stop bar to capture L1; N .1 0 c Q c O O J M a� E M U r JT L a� c r a O a c O :r 0 a� O a d U) J N M N O N W i d E d O Z C N E t ct R r r Q Packet Pg. 295 9.1.h Collision Report Secondary Intersection Weather Damage Hit and Motor Vehicles Passengers Commercial School Bus Pedestrians Pedalcyclists Number Collision Date County City Jurisdiction Agency Primary Trafficway Trafficway Block Number Related Condition Lighting Condition Injury Severity Object Struck Threshold Met Run Involved Involved Carrier Involved Involved Involved Involved EA01404 1/1/2020 18:23 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On Minor Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EA17398 2/22/2020 21:58 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220TH ST SW 22000 Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On Minor Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 EA20495 3/3/2020 17:36 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220TH ST SW 22000 Y Clear Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y N 1 Y N N 1 0 EA21722 3/8/2020 13:12 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 238TH ST SW 23700 Y Overcast Daylight Minor Injury Collision N N 1 N N N 1 0 EA30525 4/17/2020 14:53 Snohomish Lynnwood State Road State Patrol SR 99 228TH ST SW 22800 Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EA61800 9/6/2020 23:00 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR 99 244TH ST SW 24400 Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 EA63049 9/8/2020 14:48 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y Y 2 Y N N 0 0 EA68779 10/2/2020 22:28 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 238TH ST SW 23800 Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision NONE Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EA76826 10/31/2020 13:22 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 216TH ST SW 21600 Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EA82349 11/18/2020 8:50 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224 ST SW 22400 Y Raining Daylight Minor Injury Collision Metal Utility Box Y N 3 Y N N 0 0 EA86389 12/3/2020 9:20 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR 99 216TH ST SW 21600 Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 EB09806 2/26/2021 16:34 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224TH ST SW 22300 N Y Overcast Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EB10820 3/2/2021 13:48 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR 99 216TH ST SW 21600 N Y Clear Daylight Ainor Injury Collisio Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EB13203 3/10/2021 15:36 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR 99 244TH ST SW 24400 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EB14597 3/17/2021 13:42 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220TH ST SW 22000 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 N Y N 0 0 EB18605 4/1/2021 16:30 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 220TH ST SW 21900 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y Y 2 Y N N 0 0 EB33976 5/27/2021 15:30 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 238TH ST SW 23800 N Y Raining Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 EB63582 9/1/2021 17:55 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220TH ST SW 22000 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision N N 2 Y N N 0 0 EB69371 9/19/2021 17:25 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 236TH ST SW 23600 N Y Overcast Daylight Ainor Injury Collisio N N 1 Y N N 0 1 EB80909 10/17/2021 21:18 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 220 ST SW 21900 N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y Y 2 N N N 0 0 EB81118 10/24/2021 2:27 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220TH ST SW 21900 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On Ainor Injury Collisio Y N 2 N N N 0 0 EB83111 10/28/2021 20:54 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR 99 228TH ST SW 22800 N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision N N 2 N N N 0 0 EB98477 12/2/2021 19:14 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224 ST SW 22400 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y Y 2 N N N 0 0 EC14225 1/22/2022 15:36 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 N Y Clear Daylight Ainor Injury Collisio Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EC16976 2/2/2022 0:57 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR 99 216TH ST SW 21600 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On Ainor Injury Collisio Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EC20595 2/14/2022 6:30 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 244TH ST SW 24400 N Y Overcast Dark -Street Lights On Ainor Injury Collisio Y N 2 N N N 0 0 EC20173 2/14/2022 11:48 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 N Y Clear Daylight Ainor Injury Collisio Y N 1 N N N 0 1 EC21933 2/20/2022 22:50 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 238TH ST SW 23800 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 EC45462 5/10/2022 16:40 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police SR-99 224TH ST SW 22400 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y Y 2 N N N 0 0 EC51868 6/2/2022 21:16 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 220 ST SW 21900 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On Ainor Injury Collisio Y N 3 Y N N 0 0 EC54781 6/10/2022 13:36 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 N Y Overcast Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 3 N N N 0 0 EC59118 6/23/2022 18:30 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 220TH ST SW 22000 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EC70496 8/3/2022 6:31 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 212TH ST SW 21200 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EC82621 9/10/2022 20:56 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 228TH ST SW 22800 N Y Fog or Smog or Smoke Dark -Street Lights On Ainor Injury Collisio Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EC84480 9/15/2022 18:16 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 212TH ST SW 21200 N Y Clear Daylight known Injury Collis) Y Y 1 N N N 0 0 EC98425 10/29/2022 22:11 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 ED10622 12/2/2022 23:37 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224TH ST SW 22400 N Y Snowing Dark -Street Lights On Ainor Injury Collisio Y Y 2 Y N N 0 0 ED13020 12/10/2022 6:35 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HWY 99 224 ST SW 22300 N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On Ainor Injury Collisio Y N 2 N N N 0 0 ED18246 12/24/2022 19:42 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police HIGHWAY 99 220TH ST SW 22000 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 Packet Pg. 296 9.1.h Collision Report Number EA15884 EA21441 EA55371 EA61190 EA23427 EA12363 EA14906 EA88314 EA92026 EB06244 EB23743 EC63100 Collision Date 2/5/2020 14:10 3/6/2020 19:29 8/14/2020 15:00 9/3/2020 20:26 3/12/2020 10:45 2/4/2020 17:52 2/14/2020 12:48 12/9/2020 17:25 12/21/2020 16:40 2/14/2021 19:40 4/20/2021 16:15 7/10/2022 21:36 County City Jurisdiction Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Snohomish Edmonds City Street Agency Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Primary Trafficway 220TH ST SW 220TH ST SW 220TH ST SW 220 ST SW 76 AVE W 76TH AVE W 76TH AVE W 76TH AVE W 76TH AVE W 76TH AVE W 220TH ST SW 220TH ST SW Damage Commercial Secondary Intersection Threshold Hit and Motor Vehicles Passengers Carrier School Bus Pedestrians Pedalcyclists Trafficway Block Number School Zone Related Weather Condition Lighting Condition Injury Severity Met Run Involved Involved Involved Involved Involved Involved 76TH AVE W 7500 N Y Clear Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y Y 2 N N N 0 0 76TH AVE W N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 3 N N N 0 0 76TH AVE W N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision N N 2 Y N N 0 0 76 AVE W 7600 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y Y 2 N N N 0 0 220 ST SW 22000 N Y Overcast Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 3 N N N 0 0 220TH ST SW 21900 N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 220TH ST SW 22000 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 220TH ST SW 2200 N Y Overcast Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 220TH ST SW N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 220TH ST SW N Y et or Hail or Freezing R Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y Y 2 N N N 0 0 76TH AVE W N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 76TH AVE W 7600 N Y Clear Dusk No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 Packet Pg. 297 9.1.h Collision Report Secondary Block School Intersection Number Collision Date County City Jurisdiction Agency Primary Trafficway Trafficway Number Zone Related EA45963 7/5/2020 4:05 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 9TH AVE S 220TH ST SW N Y EB18852 4/2/2021 20:50 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 220TH ST SW 100TH AVE W 9900 N Y EB24518 4/23/2021 15:42 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 100TH AVE W 220TH ST SW N Y EB48665 7/14/2021 15:40 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 9TH AVE S 220TH ST SW N Y EB83491 10/28/2021 18:44 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 220TH ST SW 100TH AVE W 9900 N Y EC75696 8/19/2022 8:28 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 100TH AVE W 220TH ST SW N Y ED01006 11/4/2022 18:40 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 9TH AVE S 220TH ST SW 22000 N Y ED14161 12/12/2022 18:05 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 9TH AVE S 220TH ST SW 1100 N Y Weather Condition Lighting Condition Clear Dark - Unknown Lighting Clear Dark -Street Lights On Clear Daylight Clear Daylight Raining Dark -Street Lights On Raining Daylight Overcast Dark -Street Lights On Clear Dark -Street Lights On Injury Severity No Injury Collision No Injury Collision Minor Injury Collision No Injury Collision No Injury Collision No Injury Collision Minor Injury Collision Minor Injury Collision Damage Motor Commercial Threshold Hit and Vehicles Passengers Carrier Met Run Involved Involved Involved Y Y 1 Y N Y N 1 N N Y N 3 Y N Y N 2 N N Y N 2 Y N Y N 2 N N Y N 2 N N Y N 3 N N School Bus Pedestrians Pedalcyclists Involved Involved Involved N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 Packet Pg. 298 9.1.h Collision Report Number EA15169 EA59850 EA01885 EA11297 EA70780 EB98901 EB29948 EB38228 EB67478 EC66447 ED16186 ED16188 EC46309 EC29476 Collision Date 2/15/2020 20:06 8/31/2020 15:06 1/12/2020 21:17 2/5/2020 13:17 10/9/2020 17:28 12/8/2021 17:20 5/13/2021 18:20 6/11/2021 15:32 9/14/2021 7:10 7/21/2022 10:00 12/19/2022 9:00 12/19/2022 10:30 5/12/2022 21:30 3/17/2022 15:24 County Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish Snohomish City Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Edmonds Jurisdiction City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street City Street Agency Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Primary Trafficway 212TH ST SW 212TH ST SW 76TH AVE W 76TH AVE W 76TH AVE W 76TH AVE W 212TH ST SW 212TH ST SW 212 ST SW 212 ST SW 212 ST SW 212 ST SW 212TH ST SW 76TH AVE W Secondary Trafficway 76TH AVE W 76TH AVE W 212TH ST SW 212TH ST SW 212TH ST SW 212TH ST SW 76TH AVE W 76TH AVE W 76 AVE W 76 AVE W 76 AVE W 76 AVE W 76TH AVE W 212TH ST SW Damage Block School Intersection Weather Threshold Hit and Motor Vehicles Passengers Commercial Carrier School Bus Pedestrians Pedalcyclists Number Zone Related Condition Lighting Condition Injury Severity Met Run Involved Involved Involved Involved Involved Involved N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision N N 2 Y N N 0 0 7600 N Y Clear Daylight Minor Injury Collision N N 2 Y N N 0 0 N Y Snowing Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 1 N N N 0 0 21200 N Y Raining Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 7600 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 21200 N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 7600 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision N N 2 Y N N 0 0 7600 N Y Raining Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 N Y Clear Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y N 1 N N N 0 1 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y Y N 0 0 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 N Y Raining Daylight Minor Injury Collision N Y 1 N N N 1 0 Packet Pg. 299 9.1. h Damage Collision Report Primary Weather Lighting Threshold Hit and Motor Vehicles Passengers Commercial School Bus Pedestrians Pedalcyclists Number Collision Date County City Jurisdiction Agency Trafficway Secondary Trafficway School Zone Intersection Related Condition Condition Injury Severity Met Run Involved Involved Carrier Involved Involved Involved Involved ED07421 11/24/2022 11:07 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Municipal/City Police ;R104 DAYTON ST N Y Clear Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 Packet Pg. 300 9.1.h Collision Report Number EA16280 EA18534 EA56441 EB30611 ED01660 Collision Date County City Jurisdiction 2/19/2020 15:10 Snohomish Edmonds State Road 2/26/2020 11:21 Snohomish Edmonds State Road 8/17/2020 12:40 Snohomish Edmonds State Road 5/16/2021 12:53 Snohomish Edmonds State Road 11/6/2022 23:00 Snohomish Edmonds State Road Agency Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Municipal/City Police Primary Trafficway SR 104 HWY 104 HWY 104 HWY 104 SR 104 Secondary Trafficway 100TH AVE W 100TH AVE W 100TH AVE W 100 AVE W 100TH AVE W School Intersection Weather Block Number Zone Related Condition 10000 N Y Clear N Y Clear N Y Clear N Y Clear N Y Raining Lighting Condition Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Dark -Street Lights On Injury Severity No Injury Collision No Injury Collision Minor Injury Collision No Injury Collision Minor Injury Collision Damage Threshold Hit and Motor Vehicles Passengers Commercial Carrier Met Run Involved Involved Involved Y N 2 N N Y N 2 N N Y N 2 N N Y N 2 Y N Y N 2 N N School Bus Pedestrians Pedalcyclists Involved Involved Involved N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 Packet Pg. 301 9.1.h Collision Report Primary Secondary School Intersection Weather Damage Hit and Motor Vehicles Passengers Commercial Carrier School Bus Pedestrians Pedalcyclists Number Collision Date County City Jurisdiction Agency Trafficway Trafficway Block Number Zone Related Condition Lighting Condition Injury Severity Threshold Met Run Involved Involved Involved Involved Involved Involved EA79824 11/10/2020 15:20 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 228 ST SW 76 AVE W 22700 N Y Overcast Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EA73654 10/16/2020 9:09 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVE W 228TH ST SW 22800 N Y Clear Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EB87781 11/7/2021 15:20 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76 AVE W 228 ST SW N Y Overcast Daylight No Injury Collision Y Y 2 N N N 0 0 EB53244 7/29/2021 11:55 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 76TH AVE W Z28TH ST SW 22800 N Y Clear Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EB15428 3/21/2021 16:04 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police ?28TH ST SW 76TH AVE W N Y Raining Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 EB62301 8/23/2021 16:16 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police ?28TH ST SW 76TH AVE W 7600 N Y Clear Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y Y 2 N N N 0 0 EB67889 9/15/2021 9:32 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police ?28TH ST SW 76TH AVE W N Y Overcast Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 EB94309 11/26/2021 17:11 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police ?28TH ST SW 76TH AVE W 7600 N Y Raining Dark -Street Lights Off No Injury Collision Y N 3 N N N 0 0 EC32547 3/28/2022 13:33 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 228 ST SW 76 AVE W 7700 N Y Overcast Daylight No Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EC78407 8/23/2022 17:14 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police 228 ST SW 76 AVE W N Y Clear Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y N 2 Y N N 0 0 EC61068 7/3/2022 13:44 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police ?28TH ST SW 76TH AVE W 7600 N Y Raining Daylight Minor Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 ED14162 12/12/2022 18:30 Snohomish Edmonds City Street Municipal/City Police ?28TH ST SW 76TH AVE W 22800 N Y Clear Dark -Street Lights On No Injury Collision Y N 2 N N N 0 0 Packet Pg. 302 9.1.i 2023 Data: Hot off the Press Although pedestrian involved collisions represented a low number of parking lot collisions, the overall number of pedestrian related collisions in 2023 increased. The table below categorizes pedestrian related collisions into 6 locations for each trimester of 2023. 1 2 3 Total Parking Lots 3 1 4 8 HWY 99 0 2 1 3 HWY 104 1 0 0 1 HWY 524 0 2 0 2 Downtown 1 0 4 5 Other 1 3 10 14 Total 6 8 19 The total number of pedestrian related collisions for the first two trimesters are typical of previous years. However, the total number of pedestrian related collisions in the third trimester is over 3 times more than it was in 2022 (6) and almost 2 times as much as 2021 (10). Since 2020, there was a significant decrease in pedestrian related collisions. However, the totals for 2023 resemble pre -pandemic numbers with 22 total collisions in 2018 and 28 total collisions in 2019. N LO N 0 U a� CU U t a� as U 0 a y c 0 E w E 0 L CU r CU 0 M N 0 N a� .N a) E a Packet Pg. 303 9.1.i Vehicle vs. Pedestrian Collisions by Year 35 30 2S 20 is 10 0 2018 2019 2020 2021 N LO 7 N m C d d C 7 O U O L d E Cu U 2M a) / U_ O a y C O E W E O L Cu r Cu 0 M N O N t as .N a� E a Packet Pg. 304 9.1.i 2019 202u 2021 2022 2023 The last data set that I analyzed was intersection collisions. There were 204 collisions that occurred in intersections in 2023. There were many intersections that had multiple collisions, but some of the more prevalent locations are as follows: • HWY 99 and 220th St. SW 12 HWY 99 and 228th St. SW 5 HWY 104 and 240th St. SW 5 220th St. SW and 76th Ave W 19 6 220th St. SW and 100th Ave W/9th Ave S 212th St SW and 72nd Ave \N 5 212th St. SW and 76th Ave W 4 228th St. SW and 76th Ave W Main St. and 9th Ave 13 The locations highlighted in red are locations that are controlled by traffic signals, while the locations highlighted in gray are controlled by stop signs (in at least one direction). Further discussion with the City's traffic engineer will be needed in order to identify if there is an engineering adjustment that can be made for these locations. However, one adjustment that can be made for the locations in red are the implementation of red light cameras. There are multiple studies that have been done that support the positive impact that red light cameras have on decreasing the number of violations, which lead to intersection related collisions. I believe that these could be a benefit at these intersections, as well as a few others that may not have the collision data to support it, but have a high volume of pedestrian traffic and a high volume of complaints about drivers running red lights (such as HWY 104 and Dayton St.). N LO 7 N _ a� as _ 0 U O L m E CU U t aM M a� a� U_ O a y _ 0 E w E 0 L CU CU 0 M N 0 N t M W 2 .N a� E r a Packet Pg. 305 9.2 City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: 03/26/2024 Resolution Concerning ReEstablishment Workplan of the Edmonds Downtown Business Improvement District Staff Lead: City Council Department: City Council Preparer: Beckie Peterson Background/History When the Edmonds Downtown Business Improvement District was established by Ordinance 3909 in January 2013, there was no termination date included in the establishment documents. Recommendation A motion to approve the attached resolution concerning the Edmonds Downtown Business Improvement District workplan. Narrative It is considered a best practice to include a specific term of duration in establishment documents. The BID Executive Board and Advisory Committee and the City administration are aligned in wanting to research this and other best practices, and to consider changes to the Edmonds Downtown BID as a result of that exploration. Per discussion at the BID Advisory Board meeting on March 14, 2024, the BID intends to explore using money from the BID budget to engage a consultant who specializes in BIDs and Main Street USA programs to help prepare a workplan. The Council, by passing this resolution, indicates support, and sets an expectation of the timeline for Council to receive and take action on this BID workplan. Attachments: 2024-03-19 BID resolution post meeting draft 4 Packet Pg. 306 9.2.a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A TIMEFRAME FOR CONSIDERATION OF A REESTABLISHMENT WORKPLAN FOR THE EDMONDS DOWNTOWN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS Executive Board and Advisory Committee of the Edmonds Downtown Business Improvement District (BID) along with City leadership are aligned in wanting to make sure that the BID is operating in alignment with best practices, which include, but are not limited to, a term of duration in its establishment documents; and WHEREAS, the BID Advisory Committee, per discussion at its meeting on March 14, 2024, intends to explore using money from the BID budget to engage a consultant who specializes in BIDs and Main Street USA programs; and WHEREAS, the city council anticipates that, with or without the assistance of a consultant, the BID will prepare a workplan for the reestablishment of the BID; and WHEREAS, this work plan is likely to include the various procedural steps available to reestablish it with different terms, including a fixed term or duration; and now therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council intends to take action on the BID's reestablishment workplan not later than summer of 2025. RESOLVED this 26`h day of March, 2024. CITY OF EDMONDS MAYOR, MIKE ROSEN ATTEST: CITY CLERK, SCOTT PASSEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: Packet Pg. 307 9.2.a PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO. a Packet Pg. 308