Loading...
2024-04-09 Council PPW MinutesPARKS & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING April 9, 2024 Elected Officials Present Staff Present Councilmember Susan Paine (Chair) Oscar Antillon, Public Works Director Councilmember Michelle Dotsch Rob English, City Engineer Council President Olson (ex-officio) Angie Feser, Parks, Rec. & Human Serv. Dir. Councilmember Jenna Nand Ryan Hague, Project Manager Scott Passey, City Clerk CALL TO ORDER The Edmonds City Council PPW Committee meeting was called to order virtually and in the City Council Conference Room, 121 — 5t" Avenue North, Edmonds, at 1:30 pm by Councilmember Paine. 2. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Snohomish County - City of Edmonds Interlocal Agreement for Mee Parkland Acquisition Ms. Feser explained this City of Edmonds - Snohomish County Conservation Futures Grant Interlocal Agreement for reimbursement of eligible expenditures is related to the Mee parkland acquisition. The grant allows up to 75% reimbursement on acquisition costs as well as activities associated with acquiring the property such as due diligence, securing the site, demolition of buildings, etc. The property acquisition closed on March 22, 2024 and the property is now in the City's possession per council action on February 20, 2024. The ILA has been reviewed and approved by the city attorney and Snohomish County attorneys. Discussion followed regarding congratulations to staff for obtaining funding, when the public will have access to the property, future master planning of the site, and the conservation easement that limits some uses. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 2. 2023 Transportation Impact Fee Annual Report Mr. English reviewed: • 2023 Annual Report Beginning Balance $2,280,814 I pact fees $323,573 Expenditures 220t" St. Loan Payment ($2,388 76t"/220t" Intersection Improvements ($35,976 2023 Interest $74,640 Ending Balance $2,621,663 • History of Impact Fees Year Impact Fees 2004-2013 $1,083,941 2014 $202,295 2015 $66,334 2016 $139,031 04/09/24 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 2 2017 $372,481 2018 $201,384 2019 $442,245 2020 $805,648 2021 $292,730 2022 $323,888 2023 $323,573 Total $4,249,514 Questions and discussion followed regarding the 76th/220th intersection improvements, management and best practices related to the traffic impact fee account, and 10 year window to expend fees. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 3. Presentation of Professional Services Agreement for KPG/Psomas to Provide Design Engineering Services for the Phase 5 Storm Utility Replacement/Rehab Protect Mr. English explained an RFQ was issued in 2021 to select the design consultant for a 2-year period; the first year of design was for Phase 4 which is now out to bid. This is design of Phase 5 which will be built in 2025. The scope of work includes over 2,100 feet of cured in place pipe (CIPP) lining in two locations, 24" diameter corrugated metal pipe (CMP) on 80th, and 48" diameter CMP on SR 104 in the Westgate area. The consultant fee of approximately $137,000 includes a $15,000 in management reserve. The schedule is to finish design in the first quarter of 2025 and construction in summer 2025. Questions and discussion followed regarding a potential third location of pipe replacement left over from Phase 4, and CIPP not requiring trenching so it does not impact roadway surface. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 4. 5-ft Dedication for 98th Ave W Right -of -Way adjacent to 22214 98th Ave W Mr. English explained this is a proposed 3-lot short plat on 98th Ave W. The street plan requires a 60- foot right-of-way and the current right-of-way on the west side where the short plat connects has a 25- foot right-of-way so the City is requiring a 5-foot dedication as part of development to increase the right- of-way to 30 feet. Questions and discussion followed regarding another parcel on 98th Ave W that has not dedicated 5- feet of right-of-way, and requirement for dedication of right-of-way with development. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda 5. A&T Dreams 10-ft Street Dedication and 20-ft Public Sewer Easement Mr. English explained this is related to a proposed single family development at 16516 74th Place W. The street map indicates a 10-foot right-of-way dedication is required along the 76th Ave W property frontage of the subject development which will be dedicated to the City as a condition of development. Before this is scheduled on a future consent agenda, staff will verify that the dedication is across the entire parcel as shown on the survey. In addition, an existing public sanitary sewer main is located within the subject property and a 20-ft wide sewer easement shall be provided to the City as a condition of development. 04/09/24 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 3 Questions and discussion followed regarding the location of the easement, sewer line shown on the City's GIS map but there is no recorded sewer easement, City requiring the easement be dedicated as part of approval, and prescriptive easement based on years the sewer line has existed. Committee recommendation: Consent agenda (after verification with surveyor) 6. Update on Main Street Mr. English advised this update was a result of questions asked at the end of last week's presentation to council. He reviewed: Comprehensive Transportation Plan 2015 Bicycle Facilities Map 04/09/24 PPW Committee Minutes, Page 4 • Funding Source Phase Amount Bike Lanes Bike Sharrows No bike facilities Federal Construction $527k No change No change No change State-TIB Construction $305k No change No change Reduced Estimated $2,540 • Transit o Existing Route 102; proposed route 130 0 3 bus stops • Traffic calming o Request submitted a few years ago • 85th percentile in uphill (westbound) direction 33 mph (8 mph over speed limit) would trigger more investigation per traffic calming policy ■ 85th percentile downhill (westbound) 29 mph • Design change o Cost approximately $2,000 to remove bike lane and reconfiguring striping plan Mr. Antillon commented if traffic calming is needed uphill, reducing the lane width can have a calming effect on traffic. The preference is always to have bike lanes first, and sharrows as a last option. Sharrows are only recommended when there is little difference between vehicle and bike speeds. Questions and discussion followed regarding Bike for Health Pathways identified by EBAG via a Verdant grant, whether the bulb -outs would remain, consequences of not following the Complete Streets ordinance, support for marked sharrows on both sides, transition at intersections, federal project 6th to 8th and local overlay 8th to 9th, right turn lane uphill at 91h & Main, pedestrians and parking in the section where the library and FAC are located, bike lane providing a buffer for people exiting their vehicles, and narrower travel lanes helping to reduce speeds. Committee recommendation: Send link to slides with designated bike routes to council 3. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 2:20 pm.