Loading...
2015.03.03 CC Agenda Packet              AGENDA EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL Council Chambers ~ Public Safety Complex 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds BUSINESS MEETING MARCH 3, 2015             7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER / FLAG SALUTE   1.(5 Minutes)Roll Call   2.(5 Minutes)Approval of Agenda   3.(5 Minutes)Approval of Consent Agenda Items   A.AM-7517 Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of February 24, 2015.   B.AM-7526 Approval of claim checks #213005 through #213121 dated February 26, 2015 for $560,279.01. Approval of payroll replacement check #61519 for $12.33.   C.AM-7520 Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Perteet for the 228th St. SW Corridor project   D.AM-7522 Authorization for Mayor to sign a grant agreement with the State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) for $157,331 for the Preliminary Design and Environmental Permitting of the Willow Creek Daylighting Project   E.AM-7523 Authorization for Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Lynnwood to formalize roles, responsibilities and usage of existing and proposed emergency interties that interconnect watermains between the City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood.   F.AM-7524 Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with The Blueline Group for Capital Projects Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Services for 2015.   4.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)*       Packet Page 1 of 344 4.Audience Comments (3 minute limit per person)* *Regarding matters not listed on the Agenda as Closed Record Review or as Public Hearings   5.(15 Minutes) AM-7482 Public Hearing and Potential Action regarding the Naming of Fire Station #16.   6.(5 Minutes) AM-7529 Authorization to Sell City Asset   7.(15 Minutes) AM-7528 City Park Award of Bid for Spray Pad and Authorizing Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement   8.(30 Minutes) AM-7519 Presentation of Proposed Goals & Policies of the 2015 Transportation Element Plan   9.(2 Hours) AM-7518 Council Position #2 Vacancy Deliberations   10.(5 Minutes)Report on Outside Boards and Committees   11.(5 Minutes)Mayor's Comments   12.(15 Minutes)Council Comments   13.Convene in executive session regarding pending or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i).   14.Reconvene in open session. Potential action as a result of meeting in executive session.   ADJOURN         Packet Page 2 of 344    AM-7517     3. A.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:Consent   Submitted By:Scott Passey Department:City Clerk's Office Type: Action  Information Subject Title Approval of City Council Meeting Minutes of February 24, 2015. Recommendation Review and approve meeting minutes. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative Attachment 1 - 2-24-2015 Draft Council Meeting Minutes Attachments 02-24-15 Draft Council Meeting minutes Form Review Form Started By: Scott Passey Started On: 02/23/2015 03:10 PM Final Approval Date: 02/23/2015  Packet Page 3 of 344 EDMONDS CITY COUNCIL DRAFT MINUTES February 24, 2015 The Edmonds City Council meeting was called to order at 6:45 p.m. by Mayor Earling in the Council Chambers, 250 5th Avenue North, Edmonds. ELECTED OFFICIALS PRESENT Dave Earling, Mayor Adrienne Fraley-Monillas, Council President Diane Buckshnis, Councilmember Kristiana Johnson, Councilmember Lora Petso, Councilmember Joan Bloom, Councilmember ELECTED OFFICIALS ABSENT Thomas Mesaros, Councilmember STAFF PRESENT Phil Williams, Public Works Director Carrie Hite, Parks, Rec. & Cult. Serv. Dir. Shane Hope, Development Services Director Patrick Doherty, Econ. Dev & Comm. Serv. Dir. Rob English, City Engineer Kernen Lien, Senior Planner Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Mgr. I Jennifer Lambert, Engineering Technician JoAnne Zulauf, Engineering Technician Jeff Taraday, City Attorney Scott Passey, City Clerk Jerrie Bevington, Camera Operator Jeannie Dines, Recorder 1. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PER RCW 42.30.140(1)(b) At 6:45 p.m., Mayor Earling announced that the City Council would meet in executive session to discuss collective bargaining per RCW 42.30.140(1)(b). He stated that the executive session was scheduled to last approximately 15 minutes and would be held in the Jury Meeting Room, located in the Public Safety Complex. No action was anticipated to occur as a result of meeting in executive session. Elected officials present at the executive session were: Mayor Earling, and Councilmembers Johnson, Fraley-Monillas, Buckshnis, Petso and Bloom. Others present were City Attorney Jeff Taraday, Sharon Cates, City Attorney Office, Public Works Director Phil Williams, Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services/Human Resources Reporting Director, Human Resources Manager Mary Ann Hardie and City Clerk Scott Passey. The executive session concluded at 7:02 p.m. Mayor Earling reconvened the regular City Council meeting at 7:05 p.m. and led the flag salute. 2. ROLL CALL City Clerk Scott Passey called the roll. All elected officials were present with the exception of Councilmember Mesaros. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA IN CONTENT AND ORDER. Packet Page 4 of 344 COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS, TO AMEND THE AGENDA BY MOVING ITEM 14 TO ITEM 6A. AMENDMENT CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS COUNCILMEMBER BUCKSHNIS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY- MONILLAS, TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. The agenda items approved are as follows: A. APPROVAL OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 17, 2015 B. APPROVAL OF CLAIM CHECKS #212946 THROUGH #213004 DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2015 FOR $99,966.33. APPROVAL OF PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT AND CHECKS #61502 THROUGH #61511 FOR $465,060.76, BENEFIT CHECKS #61512 THROUGH #61518 AND WIRE PAYMENTS OF $516,891.19 FOR THE PAY PERIOD FEBRUARY 1, 2015 THROUGH FEBRUARY 15, 2015 C. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF TWO CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FROM MARIAN UNGUREANU ($2,000.00 TOTAL) D. AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT WITH JAMES G. MURPHY TO SELL SURPLUS CITY VEHICLES 5. AUDIENCE COMMENTS David Meyer, Edmonds, was opposed to any change to Resolution 1005 and vehemently opposed to public access through the cemetery. A property owner on the north side of the cemetery, he noted funerals at the cemetery often have 50-100 cars and he questioned how public access would be possible. If the proposal would widen the road, it would be within inches of his rear property line which was not the situation when he purchased the property nor was it the situation the people who purchased the plots in that area envisioned. He spoke of the beautiful setting and found it ridiculous to clear the large pine trees to build nine homes and even more ridiculous to build a public thoroughfare in that area. People visiting the cemetery to mourn their loved ones appreciated the solitude and would not want the occupants of another nine homes staring at them. Craig Pierce, Bothell, representing Select Homes, who is specifically involved with the parcel that abuts 104th and the 20-foot alley/access road. He described their process; they originally came to the City in September for a pre-application process for the parcel to see if it could be developed. That meeting which involved Public Works, Fire, Planning and Building staff included discussion of a 4-lot short plat for the property. One of discussion items was the 20-foot access road and verifying ownership. Staff found it was owned by Edmonds and later said it was available for access for the 4-lot short plat. From that pre- application meeting, Select Homes completed feasibility, closed on the property and began a formal application for a 4-lot short plat. They were informed of the resolution and its impact on their application at the first review of the short plat. Staff’s presentation will include the original application for the 4 lots as well as a secondary, potential access but Select Homes does not think it would be as advantageous to the City to have two roads side-by-side. Jan Robertson, Edmonds, Forest Glenn, said she was opposed to the proposed construction. She referred to a letter she submitted from John Nordquist, a former Councilmember. When Woodway Highlands was being developed, Councilmembers and then-Mayor Haakenson walked area and subsequently adopted Resolution 1005. The resolution grandfathered the existing residents but did not Packet Page 5 of 344 allow additional access because most of the utilities were installed pre-code when the property was in Snohomish County such as a 9-inch diameter cast iron water pipe that serves all the residents, a sewer lift for Woodway Meadows and their area and pipes at depth of 2½ feet which is no longer allowed. The residents welcome new neighbors as it would not be a bad thing to get rid of the blackberries but not on the alley which cannot handle the weight of traffic. She suggested access be built on the north side where a lane could serve the properties without destroying what they were promised in Resolution 1005. Mayor Earling declared a break to resolve a technical issue. Eric Montgomery, Edmonds, Forest Glenn, said his property backs up to the alley and he was opposed to any change to the alley. He suggested access be provided on the north side off 104th. He was also speaking for a couple of his neighbors who could not be here tonight. He suggested if four houses were approved, there was the possibility of six more houses which would be 20 more cars using the access. He questioned whether there would be a 28-30-foot wide road with sidewalks, fire lane, street lights, etc. in his backyard. Jim Letson, owner, Beck Funeral Home and Restlawn Memorial Park, explained when they purchased the properties in 2006, they knew some changes would need to be made in the future to ensure economic viability and provide the necessary support facilities for maintenance, staging of equipment and inventory to support the activities of Restlawn. Cemeteries are a unique entity; few other businesses convey something that carries an obligation into perpetuity. When he sells the rights to use of cemetery or cremation space at Restlawn, he is contractually obligated and regulated by law to care for the property as long as he owns it. When ownership of the property is conveyed in the future, the new owner must comply with State board requirement that they will accept those obligations. Further a cemetery is the repository for a tremendous amount emotion. They began to look at options to secure a strong future for Restlawn quite some time ago and have met with staff a couple times to discuss the conversion of dedicated, unplatted and unneeded cemetery land, presently used for maintenance and storage, into tax lots that would be sold and constructed with moderately priced new homes consistent with the surrounding zoning. He invited Councilmembers to drive down the alley and look at the back corner of their property and the wooded area. He referred to things happening in that wooded area that should not; this transaction, which they support, would be a win-win for everyone and would provide for the future of Restlawn as a viable property. Rick Wurdeman, Edmonds, requested the Council consider repealing Resolution 1005. He has been working with owners of both parcels for approximately a year and was surprised to learn at this late stage of the existence of resolution that limits the way the 20-foot right-of-way can be used. He understood the residents to not want change but said it was somewhat unreasonable for them to ask that the land sit unused in perpetuity at the expense of Select Homes who has purchased approximately half of the property and are now facing the possibility of not being able to use it, and Mr. Letson who has over an acre of property he has no use for and can be developed. The development proposed by Mr. Letson and Mr. Pierce will be good for the City; it will create 9-10 new moderately priced homes that will help the City meet the demand for housing, meet Comprehensive Plan goals, and result in enormous improvements to the strip of property where undesirable activities occur. The concern about utilities is not realistic because Select Homes’ plans include bringing all utilities up to code including improved fire and safety access for all residents as well as increasing the City’s tax base as the cemetery property is currently exempt from tax. If the City repeals the resolution, it gives staffs an opportunity to promote and facilitate the orderly and logical development of the property consistent with the City’s obligation to make the best and highest use of their property. He urged the Council to seriously consider repealing Resolution 1005 or to refer it to staff or the Planning Board for recommendation regarding access to these large, unused properties. Packet Page 6 of 344 Charles Thompson, Edmonds, Forest Glenn, spoke in support of retaining Resolution 1005 as it is currently written. He referred to correspondence from 1996 from Edmonds’ Planning Manager to the Town of Woodway that states the City does not support any access roadway that provides anything more than a restricted, emergency-only access to the east. Unrestricted access would introduce through traffic into adjacent subdivision and seriously impact the safety and character of these developed areas. These subdivisions were not designed to support this type of traffic impact. He was not opposed to development and actually welcomed development because it would replace the blackberries and it would great for the City. He supported retaining Resolution 1005 and providing access on north side within the developer’s property. Evan Pierce, Edmonds, said the effect on him personally would be negligible as the houses would be across street and he and his neighbors were okay with the property being developed. When his house was developed in 2004, he was told the gate at the end of the strip of land that borders Woodway Highlands would never be opened and based on Resolution 1005 it was designated as emergency and he could not gain access from that area and needed to gain access from 104th. He referred to a survey done by the Orca Survey Company of the 4-lot as well as the 6-lot parcel that is still dedicated cemetery property and then a single family application was submitted in early December without any borders shown for the other lots and the 4-lot subdivision that was submitted in early January. He pointed out this is a 10-lot development running east to west and it should be viewed holistically as one project because regardless of whether the deed dedication of the cemetery property occurs now or in a year, they will be contiguous at some point. Speaking for most of his neighbors, he said this could be accomplished without spending any more City time or resources or publicly owned property by putting the access east to west on the north edge of the contiguous 10-lot parcel. This would also provide full access to the 5-6 lots in the back and would not require any action by the City. He referred to a letter he provided the Council. Marsha Fisher, Edmonds, said her property borders the alley on the south side. She agreed with the previous speakers in that she did not mind the development occurring but access should be on the north side instead of using the alley. She referred to an email she provided the Council. Marjorie Pemberton, Edmonds, said she lives on the alley and did not want the alley turned into major a road and everyone whose property borders the alley feels the same way. She disagreed that crime occurred in the alley. Eva Marie Bottle, Edmonds, a resident on the north side of the cemetery said her property would be affected by a road on that side. Their backyard is approximately 5 feet from the existing road. Backyards are where people retreat for privacy and no one wants their backyard to border a road. She feared a road would reduce property values and homes are many people’s most important investment. She said Woodway Meadows had been butchered in the last few years by the park and the baseball cage. Roger Hertrich, Edmonds, pointed out Councilmembers usually campaign on protecting neighborhoods; a lot of the audience members represent a neighborhood. He said the problem could be easily solved as some of the speakers have suggested. A member of Economic Development Commission, he reported Commissioners were told that no more than seven Commissioners could serve on a subcommittee or visit a subcommittee meeting because it would result in a quorum. He suggested advertising the subcommittee meetings would resolve this problem. Commissioners were also informed the annual report to the Council will be written by a few members and presented to Council without review by the entire the EDC. 6. DIVERSITY COMMISSION Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Director Carrie Hite reported in 2011 the Council discussed forming a Diversity Commission and in December 2014 the Council charged Councilmembers Packet Page 7 of 344 Buckshnis, Petso and Peterson with inviting interested citizens to form a task force for the purpose of bringing forth a recommendation for a Diversity Commission. Before the Council tonight are, 1) an ordinance creating a new ECC Chapter 10.65 forming a Diversity Commission, and 2) a recommendation for staff support and a budget for the Diversity Commission. Ms. Hite introduced three task force members, Mario Brown, Venus Gomez Deming and Gayle Ketzel. Other members of the Diversity Task Force include Emily Hill, Tung Bui, Jeanne Park, and Diane Talmadge. The task force along with Councilmembers Petso and Buckshnis did a lot heavy lifting in two meetings as well as homework between the meetings. The Council packet contains the agendas and minutes of those meetings Task Force Member Mario Brown presented the Diversity Task Force’s recommendation • Form a Diversity Commission comprised of nine members; two appointed by the Mayor and one by each Councilmember. After Commissioners’ terms expire, the Commission will find their own replacements • Include Woodway and Esperance in the Commission • Allow anyone who lives, goes to school or works in Edmonds, Woodway Esperance to apply to be on the Commission. With regard to why the City should have a Diversity Commission, Mr. Brown said some may think this is a post-racial world and it was obsolete to have discussions regarding diversity. He was honored to live in a City that was being proactive regarding this issue; several surrounding municipalities and the County have human rights and diversity issues. He pointed out there are two classes of people in the country, the in crowd and the out crowd. That happens in Edmonds illustrated by comments such as, “of course we have diversity, just look on Highway 99.” The City needs to be proactive to turn these two groups into one group; to turn two Edmonds into one Edmonds. Even though some people have lived without experiencing the pain of discrimination that does not mean the pain is not there. Society can be racist without having racist people because the system can be rigged against second class citizens. Mr. Brown described his own family, his father is a European Jewish man who worked for the Department of Defense in the Pentagon. He was raised in a 6-bedroom house in Eldorado Hills in Bremerton overlooking Puget Sound. He had all the privileges anyone could ask for growing up and has applied for the Council vacancy. Yet, when he sees a police car, he cringes and thinks about what to say if he gets pulled over. With all that he has accomplished, that thought is still in his head. Having a Diversity Commission means maybe his children will not have that fear. When someone has not experienced that feeling and are not prejudice themselves, they may think everything is fine; everything is not fine. He summarized the City can do something or hope it will go away; he encouraged the Council to do something. Ms. Deming commented it is time for Edmonds to have a Diversity Commission. She has lived in Edmonds since 1980. Her two American/Filipino children were raised in Edmonds but they are not sure they want to return to Edmonds and she can see their point. One of her children lives in Leavenworth and other lives near Green Lake in Seattle. Young families want to come to Edmonds; there is a dividing line between the bowl and Highway 99. It is time to show those who are hesitant to move here or be participants that Edmonds is open. Something is lacking and there is a way to bridge that the gap by creating a Diversity Commission that will work on creating one Edmonds. She hoped her grandchildren would enjoy diversity; although people love to come to Edmonds, many do not want to live here. Ms. Ketzel echoed Mr. Brown’s and Ms. Deming’s comments, stating these efforts are not for us, it is for the children. Inclusiveness or equality cannot be legislated but the City can reach out to the community to bring them in to encourage them to participate in the community and in government. Bringing people Packet Page 8 of 344 together will help move away from two Edmonds. She recalled speaking to a young Filipino woman last Halloween who moved away from Edmonds ten years ago because she felt there was too much prejudice and bias; she has since moved back to Edmonds because she wants to raise her daughter in a community that includes everyone. Mr. Brown commented the average age is Edmonds high, yet the United States will be a majority minority by 2050. As people age, others will take their place and Edmonds should be ahead of the curve in welcoming them. He commented the members representing the Diversity Commission tonight are privileged people of color and they are still nervous, what about the people without those privileges? He wanted the Diversity Commission to be a bridge for everyone else and recommended the Council form the Diversity Commission. Ms. Hite relayed her research of neighboring cities with regard to staff support for the commission; staff support ranges from a few cities with FTEs dedicated to diversity issues, cities that dedicated 5-10 hours/week to diversity issues as part of an FTE to 1-2 cities that dedicate 10 hours/month. The task force and Councilmembers Buckshnis and Petso suggested starting with contract staff working 10 hours/ month. The City does not have the internal staff capacity to staff this Commission. The recommended budget is $10,000; $6,000 for contract staff and a $4,000 budget for cultural awareness events. Councilmember Bloom referred to language in Chapter 10.65.030, “The commission shall set its own meeting dates and shall give notice of such meeting in compliance with the Open Public Meeting Act of the State of Washington, as it now exists and as it may be amended from time to time.” She questioned why the commission would be responsible for noticing their own meetings when that was an administrative function. City Attorney Jeff Taraday said it was not the intent to make commissioners themselves publish meeting notice. Mr. Hite advised that language was taken from the template for other boards and commissions. Mr. Taraday said the intent of the sentence was for the commission to establish the meeting date and direct the contract staff person to publish notice accordingly, not commissioners themselves. Councilmember Bloom commented other boards and commissions do not have dedicated staff. There needs to consistency in language and support for all boards and commissions. For example, the Tree Board has no dedicated staff and no funds to provide dedicated staff. She has repeatedly asked the Development Services Department to assign a staff person to support the Tree Board without success. She fully supported the Diversity Commission but had questions about the language, their responsibilities and the funds allocated to the Diversity Commission when other boards and commission do not receive that level of support. The Tree Board needs that level of support; the Tree Board must Tree City USA obligations and other cities have dedicated staff that does Arbor Day events. She was not ready to approve funds until the Council reviewed all other boards and commissions for consistency in the support they are provided. Mr. Taraday suggested the language be changed to “and City shall give notice of such meeting.” Councilmember Bloom agreed with that change. Councilmember Petso said it was a pleasure to work on the Diversity Task Force. She thanked Ms. Hite for the excellent assistance she provided to get the task force moving and bringing a proposal to the Council. With regard to the concerns raised by Councilmember Bloom and the concerns she has received via email this week, she suggested if the Council supported establishing a Diversity Commission, the Council authorize it now, start the application process and form the commission while OPMA compliance, consistency between boards and commission with regard to staff and budget is reviewed. Council President Fraley-Monillas thanked the task force, commented she has a multicultural family and does not live in the bowl. With regard to Councilmember Bloom’s comment regarding equal treatment of commissions, she agreed that was an issue the Council needed to consider. Some boards and commissions Packet Page 9 of 344 have support, some do not, some have posted notice, some do not, etc. It was not intentional other than different interests have developed without standardizing and that should not stop Diversity Commission from moving forward. She had concern with including citizens who live in Esperance and Woodway. Esperance is in Snohomish County which has a Diversity Commission and Woodway has its own resources to develop a Diversity Commission. She preferred the Diversity Commission be an Edmonds Commission. Although there needed to be discussion regarding funding, she was confident the entire Council was interested in forming a Diversity Commission. Councilmember Buckshnis expressed appreciation for the work done by the task force. She suggested the commission be staffed under Community Services and Economic Development Department. A consultant is necessary because staff does not have background in diversity. Ms. Hite said the consultant will need strong facilitation skills and the ability to jumpstart the commission; staff does not have that capacity at this time. Councilmember Buckshnis agreed the consultant will need to be a strong person with training in diversity. Councilmember Johnson suggested the commission provide the Council an annual report. To those who question the need for a Diversity Commission, her research found a variety of Diversity Commission in other cities. She suggested the commission or the Council develop a work program or tasks for the commission. Her research found one Diversity Commission that wants to have election debates; another sees domestic violence as an issue. Mr. Brown said the task force formed the structure; the commissioners and Council will determine what the commission will do. Councilmember Johnson expressed interest in the purpose of the Diversity Commission and what can be expected from the commission, especially since the commission will self-select its replacement members. Mr. Hite referred to Section 10.65.010 where the task force defined the mission for the Diversity Commission, knowing that the commission may want to change that once it’s formed. Section 10.65.040 contains three statements regarding the commission’s powers and duties. Councilmember Johnson remarked the statements are very general and suggested they be refined. She noted the commission will have a budget but it is not clear what they will do. There are funds allocated in the Council budget for all boards and commissions; that would be an appropriate funding mechanism. Councilmember Johnson suggested the Diversity Commission consider a student representative, a Council liaison and seven members instead of nine members that would include an alternate and a student representative. She echoed Council President Fraley-Monillas’ concern with including Woodway and Esperance residents; she preferred members be residents of Edmonds. With regard to specific duties, Mr. Brown assured the Diversity Commission will develop a work program. With regard to including Woodway and Esperance, he suggested the Town Woodway may be interested in providing funding. The spirit of including Woodway, Edmonds, and Esperance was to take care of those residents in the event something racially-related happened to them. He agreed with the suggestion regarding a Council liaison and a student representative. With regard to a student representative, Ms. Hite said by code all codified boards and commissions are allowed to have a student representative. Ms. Deming agreed with having a student representative on the Diversity Commission, noting students in the Edmonds School District speak more than 50 languages. Councilmember Petso inquired about the residency requirement for student representatives as lot of students at Edmonds-Woodway do not live in Edmonds. If the eligibility requirements were altered to require members be Edmonds residents, she was concerned that may be inconsistent with the student representative requirement on other boards and commissions. Ms. Hite offered to research that. She pointed out the ordinance as proposed would allow anyone who lives, works or goes to school in Packet Page 10 of 344 Edmonds to be eligible to serve on the commission. The intent of the task force of including them was they work, pay taxes and/or attend school in Edmonds and should benefit from the City’s programs. Mr. Taraday referenced Section 10.03.020 which states student representatives must be residents of the City of Edmonds. With regard to why Woodway and Esperance was included, Mr. Brown provided a scenario where a Jewish family who lives in Mountlake Terrace opens a business in Edmonds and someone breaks their windows and paints swastikas. He questioned whether the City’s Diversity Commission should be able to help take care of that. Ms. Hite recognized the existing code was in conflict with the proposed ordinance with regard to residency for the student representative; she will confer with the City Attorney and return to Council with a recommendation. With regard to Mr. Brown’s comment regarding a Jewish family’s business and the Diversity Commission, Council President Fraley-Monillas clarified the intent of the commission was not to track down what happened. Most of City’s commissions are comprised of citizens of Edmonds who pay taxes. Using Mr. Brown’s theory, residents of Shoreline and Mukilteo should be eligible for the commission. She preferred to have the Diversity Commission be an Edmonds project to start with and possibly expand it in the future to include other areas. Ms. Hite summarized Council consensus on the following policy questions: • Add language that the City will notice meetings • Remove Woodway and Esperance • Only Edmonds residents are eligible to serve on the commission (not work or go to school in Edmonds) • Add a Council liaison and student representative • Add a requirement for an annual report and work plan to the City Council Ms. Hite pointed out one outstanding question is staff support. If Council approves the ordinance and a Diversity Commission is formed, she can assist with advertising for applicants, etc. but it will “die on the vine” without staff support. She encouraged the Council to discuss consistency between boards and commissions. Mayor Earling summarized the ordinance will be returned to Council with the amendments as described above for action at a future meeting. Councilmember Petso asked whether a public hearing was required. Mr. Taraday answered there is no requirement for a public hearing; the Council could hold one if they wished. 6A. ACCESS OPTIONS FOR POTENTIAL LOTS NEAR RESTLAWN CEMETERY (previously Item 14) Councilmember Petso disclosed she lives in Woodway Meadows near one of the proposed access roads to the site. Her house does not actually back on the cemetery where the proposed road would be location but it is close by. As she was on the City Council in 2011, she suspected she voted in favor of Resolution 1005. She sought legal advice from City Attorney Jeff Taraday today who indicated although she could choose to excuse herself, she did not have to and her choice tonight did not prevent her from participating at a later date if she chose. Councilmember Petso announced she will excuse herself tonight and she left the Council Chambers at 8:18 p.m. Senior Planner Kernen Lien displayed an aerial map identifying Woodway Meadows, Woodway Highland, Forest Glenn, the cemetery and the City parcel. He provided history regarding Resolution 1005; in the late 1990s when Woodway Highlands was being built (in Woodway), the developer Packet Page 11 of 344 approached the City about using the alley as emergency access. At that time, it was discovered the City did not actually own the parcel. The strip of land is identified as a parcel on Snohomish County’s parcel layer and not identified as a City of Edmonds right-of-way. In 1999 it was discovered the parcel did not transfer into City ownership when this area was annexed in 1995. When the City accepted the deed for this area, the Council enacted a temporary resolution that restricted access to the area, forwarded it to the Planning Board and the Council ultimately adopted Resolution 1005. He provided further details regarding Resolution No. 1005: • Adopted by the City Council in 2001 • Use of the tract was limited to: o Those who had previously established access to private properties to the limited extent that such access was already established o For maintenance of and access to water, sewer and other public utilities o For emergency access purposes • May be revisited at the legislative discretion of the City Council Mr. Lien display an aerial view identifying the cemetery, potential cemetery redevelopment with 5 residential lots plus cemetery maintenance lot, and 4-lot short plat PLN20150001. An application has been submitted for a 4-lot short plat on the front parcel owned by Select Homes. The City is under statutory regulations to process the short plat. There is not an application for the back property that is owned by the cemetery. However, staff did not want to view the development proposal on the front lot in a vacuum knowing there is potential for development on the back lot. Mr. Lien displayed a drawing of the potential development area, the 4-lot short plat and the cemetery property using the City parcel for access. The cemetery owner has begun the deed dedication process for the cemetery property. His understanding is the cemetery intends to develop Tracts C-G with residential development and Tract B would be used for maintenance facilities to serve Restlawn Cemetery. Using the City parcel for access would require dedication from the property on the north to obtain the necessary width. He displayed another drawing of the 4-lot subdivision as submitted to the City using the City parcel for access; Tracts 2, 3 and 4 take access from that roadway and Tract 1 would take access off 104th. When Resolution 1005 was discovered, Select Homes was informed this configuration would not be allowed. Mr. Lien displayed a drawing of the 4-lot subdivision reconfigured to include Tract 999 that would provide access for the 4-lot plat on Select Homes’ property and not using the City’s parcel. This configuration limits development possibilities for the cemetery property in the back. The City cannot compel Select Homes to provide access to the properties in the back. Constructing the road on the north side of the development is an option but the configuration that Select Homes has proposed is code compliant and the City cannot require the road be constructed on the north side. Mr. Lien explained the back property is not land locked and there are no burial plots in that area. He displayed an aerial view that identified the boundaries of the cemetery parcel and a possible way to access the parcel if access is limited by development of the 4-lot short plat in front. Staff has not made a recommendation regarding the resolution. The question for the Council is not to make a decision whether to repeal Resolution 1005, only whether the Council wants to reconsider the resolution. If the Council wants to reconsider the resolution, future meetings and a public hearing would be held to discuss the issue. Council President Fraley-Monillas relayed she was not interested in reconsidering Resolution 1005, fearing it would set a bad precedent for City-owned land. She was sorry for the developers but was unsure Packet Page 12 of 344 it was the City responsibility to ensure they could maximize the number of homes and development of the lot. Councilmember Buckshnis commented she grew up with alley and knows what it is like to have an alley and a street. Although it makes common sense to change the alley into a road, Select Homes has developed an alternative and the cemetery has other options for access. She did not want to set a precedent that alleys could become roads. She was sorry the developer did not know about Resolution 1005 but there were alternatives. Councilmember Bloom said she was not in favor of reconsidering the resolution. Her concern is manifold; this is the back of residents’ property and the issue of privacy is very compelling to her, this has never been used as road, Woodway would like to have it be opened eventually and she did not want to introduce that option for a future Council. She inquired whether there were other options for access to the 4-lot shot other than providing access adjacent to the City parcel and the access to the back parcels through the cemetery. She asked whether it would be possible to provide access on the north side ; how wide it would need to be and whether it whether it would impact the number of lots on the cemetery property and the 4- lot short plat. Mr. Lien answered it is possible to provide access on the north all the way back. The properties are under different ownership and the City cannot compel the property owner in the front to provide access to the back. If the property owners wanted to work together to provide access to all the property on private property (not using the alley), the access tract would have to be 30 feet wide. Given the zoning and the minimum lot requirement, a 30-foot wide access tract would eliminate 1 of the 4 lots in the 4-lot short plat. He was not sure how it would impact the back property. Although a north access is possible, the City cannot compel them to provide access in that location. The front property owner can proceed with their code-compliant short plat and the City is required to process it. Councilmember Bloom relayed her understanding there was no space on the cemetery property north of the 4-lot short plat that would allow development of a 30 foot wide access. Mr. Lien answered there are burial plots against the property line and there is no room to provide access on the cemetery property without moving graves. Councilmember Johnson asked whether there were any deed restrictions on the City parcel. Mr. Lien did not recall any deed restrictions; the deed was included in the Council packet as Exhibit 2. The only restrictions are those imposed by Resolution 1005. Councilmember Johnson asked whether construction on the ten lots would require upgrading sewer and water. Engineering Program Mgr. I Jeanie McConnell responded the water and sewer in that area is owned and maintained by Olympic View Water and Sewer District and they would review any development proposals. Potentially there could be requirements to upgrade the utilities. Councilmember Johnson inquired about the timeline for the short plat process. Mr. Lien answered the short plat is currently in the comment period. The City issued a Letter of Completeness; the comment period ends March 5. In the Letter of Completeness, the City requested additional information. With the discovery of Resolution 1005, one of the City’s comments to the applicant was the alley cannot be used for access and they would need to propose another alignment; one option was shown during tonight’s presentation. The City has 60 days to process a short plat; the clock stops while the City awaits their response. The applicant is interested in how the Council views Resolution 1005 and may slow their development if the resolution is reconsidered but if not, he anticipated the developer would respond to City comments and the City will be required to continue processing the application. Packet Page 13 of 344 Councilmember Johnson inquired about the deed dedication process for the cemetery property. Jim Letson, owner, Restlawn Memorial Park, explained the process for removal of the dedication has started. Notice is provided to the State Funeral and Cemetery Board and the State Department of Archeology who have the opportunity to review in detail; they usually just acknowledge the application and no action is required on their part. The matter is then submitted to Superior Court for signature on the rededication for other use. The process of submitting to Superior Court has not yet been done. Councilmember Johnson asked whether the process would take years or months. Rick Wurdeman, Edmonds, said it is approximately a 100 day process, 60 day notice to the State Funeral and Cemetery Board; when that expires, there is a month of published notice before the matter is heard by the Snohomish County Superior Court. A Superior Court Judge makes the determination whether all the statutory requirements have been met to remove the property from dedication for cemetery purposes. The cemetery property is about halfway through that process. Councilmember Johnson inquired whether rezoning would be necessary. Mr. Lien advised that property and the surrounding property are currently zoned RS-8. Councilmember Bloom asked what alternatives staff would present if the Council was not open to changing the resolution. Mr. Lien displayed the aerial view showing options for access to the cemetery property, advising staff has not offered a recommendation. If the Council reconsidered the resolution, options include allowing access to development on the cemetery property. The City parcel is only 20 feet wide which is not enough area for a road through to Woodway. Unless Resolution 1005 is reconsidered, access to the properties must be provided internally. Council President Fraley-Monillas reiterated she had no interest in reversing the resolution. Mayor Earling observed there were three dissenting voices on the Council. Development Services Director Shane Hope said the intent of this item was to bring it to the Council’s attention in the event they wanted to reconsider the resolution, look at options and/or direct staff to return with alternatives. Hearing none, staff will proceed with Resolution 1005 in place. Mayor Earling declared a brief recess. Councilmember Petso returned to Council Chambers at 8:43 p.m. 7. PRESENTATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH PERTEET FOR THE 228TH ST. SW CORRIDOR PROJECT City Engineer Rob English explained the 228th project will be advertised in early March and construction is anticipated to begin in late spring. Perteet is the designer on the project; during the construction phase there will be times their support is needed to review and provide input on submittals, RFIs, shop drawings, etc. The $63,930 fee includes a $5,000 management reserve for items that may arise during the construction phase. The fee is split between Mountlake Terrace and Edmonds because a portion of the project is on the Lakeview Drive section of Mountlake Terrace. Staff recommends placing the item on next week’s Consent Agenda. He advised the contract will also be extended to June 30, 2016. Councilmember Buckshnis reported the Lake Ballinger/McAleer Creek Watershed Forum is planning to master plan Ballinger Park (the former golf course) and wanted to ensure the project is conscientious about their master plan. Perteet did a great job on the culverts in the Nile Golf Course. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this on the Consent Agenda. Packet Page 14 of 344 8. DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT FOR 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Development Services Director Shane Hope recalled a public hearing was held last week on the Economic Development Element. The focus of this discussion is changes made to the Element to reflect Council comments made at the public hearing. Economic Development & Community Services Director Patrick Doherty advised the packet contains a clean version of the Element highlight the changes made in response to Council comments: • Page 95: Changed “political governance” to “social and political equity.” • Page 108: One of the opportunities revised to read, “Large numbers of workers who commute to Edmonds create additional demand for affordable housing. • Page 110: Revised Policy B.5 to read, Provide staff support to businesses wishing to explore the potential of additional Business Improvement Districts in other commercial areas to help fund business promotion, marketing, improvement projects, beautification, etc., in a sustainable fashion. • Page 112: Revised Policy E.5 to read, “Market Edmonds as a year-round destination for its waterfront location, historic downtown, arts community and venues, eating and drinking establishments, international shopping and dining, natural amenities, gardens and flower displays, parks and recreational assets, etc. Ms. Hope invited Councilmembers to provide any additional direction. She reviewed next steps: • February 25 Open House on the Comprehensive Plan update (5 to 7 pm, City Hall, Brackett Room) • Ongoing work and public meetings to update other Comprehensive Plan elements Councilmember Johnson asked staff to describe how citizens can engage at the open house. Ms. Hope answered people can see/learn more about the Comprehensive Plan process and the schedule so they can choose to attend meetings as well as provide comment at the open house. Councilmember Bloom said the change to B.5 made the language worse. The first objective includes language about improving the economic well-being of the community through efforts that entail job creation, job retention, tax base enhancements and quality of life. Nowhere does it mention anything about taxing business owners for the benefit of other business owners and allowing a small group of business owners to decide how to spend other business owners’ money. She said the additional language was in stark contrast to another passage, develop or maintain business recruitment programs, including a toolbox of possible incentives to encourage a wide range of new business development including retail, service, artisanal, manufacturing and professional services sectors. Councilmember Bloom said incentives to businesses are usually getting something back, reducing taxes, providing a benefit to encourage businesses to come to Edmonds; exactly the opposite is happening with the BID. Ed! is controversial, a number of business owners do not support it and do not like being taxed for the benefit of other businesses and B.5 was changed from exploring the potential of additional BIDs to providing staff support to businesses wishing to explore the potential of additional BIDs. This suggested support would be provided to a small group of businesses who want to tax all the businesses in their district, whether Westgate, Five Corners, or Firdale Village, for the benefit of a small group of business owners. She felt it was inappropriate to include this statement in the Economic Development Element and requested it be removed as she suggested last week. Mr. Doherty suggested putting the EDBID aside for the moment and explained another business district may want to form a BID to tax them for beautification, extra security, graffiti removal, etc. The staff Packet Page 15 of 344 support would be to assist the business district with understanding and navigating the process. Ability to form a BID can be an incentive for businesses who want an improvement in their area. Formation of a BID is self-generated and requires Council approval. The additional language in B.5 was to state there would be staff support if businesses wished to explore additional BIDs. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested deleting “provide staff” so that the paragraph reads, “Support to businesses wishing to…” noting the support would differ depending on the area. Mr. Doherty noted Seattle developed a manual that is available online regarding how to establish a BID. Ms. Hope referred to Policy 2.E that says explore options such as BIDs. Councilmember Buckshnis commented the Finance Director does provide financial support to the BID. She noted the possibility of the International District forming a BID in the future. Councilmember Bloom reiterated her request to delete B.5 as she did not feel it was appropriate to include reference to supporting more BIDs in the Economic Development Element. The value has not been proven, a lot of businesses are unhappy, the work plan does not address the concerns of many open-door businesses, and it does not provide anything for open-door businesses. She saw no rationale for providing any staff support to a small group of business owners who want to tax other business owners for the benefit of a small group of business owners. All the other items in the Economic Development Element address promoting the City, recruiting businesses, beautification. She clarified the flower program was not the result of the BID; it was the result of the hard work of a lot of volunteer citizens, park staff, etc. Councilmember Buckshnis said she spearheaded the Adopt a Flower Basket and Adopt a Corner Flowerbeds program which is supported by donations from citizens and businesses. She preferred to retain B.5. Councilmember Buckshnis referred to an email from Rich Senderoff regarding property tax versus sales tax ratio and asked staff to explain. Mr. Doherty explained Dr. Senderoff raised the idea that the document includes a snapshot of the economy using the most recent data and not necessarily showing a trend analysis. Specifically, there is a percentage of municipal revenue from various tax sources such as property tax versus retail sales; Edmonds has a higher percentage of property tax. Dr. Senderoff inquired how that has changed over time. Even if the document illustrated how that has changed over time, it would not change the goals and policies. The policies recognize that the property tax percentage is too high and the City needs to grow the economy to enhance the retail sales tax sector of the municipal revenue. There was nothing missing in the document by not having that information. He summarized trending over a ten year period may not paint a picture from which conclusions can be derived and it would not change the policies. Councilmember Buckshnis recognized a large portion of the City’s sales tax revenue is from car dealers and that is significantly impacted during a recession. With regard to B.5, Councilmember Johnson said she is generally in support of BIDs. If another business district such as Five Corners, Perrinville, or Firdale Village was interested in forming a BID, she would be supportive of using staff time. She acknowledged Councilmember Bloom has consistently opposed that and Ed! in particular and a significant number of people share her point of view. Councilmember Johnson said BIDs are generally a good idea and the City needs to determine how to make them as good as possible so they reflect the needs and values of the people who are being taxed. To the extend people do not feel they are getting their money’s worth, an effort needs to be made to determine how to better serve them. Councilmember Petso referred to a remark she made at the Economic Development Commission (EDC) regarding the Economic Development Element regarding a tension she feels in the document whether it is a true comprehensive planning document or whether it is an action plan type of document. She found that Packet Page 16 of 344 more so than in the Economic Development Element than in any other Comprehensive Plan Element although she found some of it in the Land Use Element. As the City is not required to have an Economic Development Element, she asked whether the City should proceed with an Economic Development Element or instead include a paragraph in the Comprehensive Plan acknowledging economic development and then develop an Economic Development Action Plan. For example one area of the document says monitor and enhance the BID; she wanted to avoid a requirement to amend the Comprehensive Plan in the event the BID is disbanded. She questioned whether the element is too specific and whether it would be preferable to include general economic development policy statements in the Comprehensive Plan and develop an Economic Development Action Plan outside the Comprehensive Plan so that changes can be made without a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mayor Earling recognized Councilmember Bloom was opposed to B.5 but three Councilmembers have stated they would support an amendment to, “Support to businesses…” Mr. Doherty suggested revising the language in B.4 slightly to recognize the possibility the BID could cease to exist in the future. He explained the reason there are so many policies in the document is the number of day-to-day activity and statements in other documents related to economic development. It is appropriate to have an overarching policy document that provides the framework for which direction is derived. He noted 22 of the 88 action items in the Strategic Action Plan are related to the economy. In addition to those 22 items, many other things are done daily to fulfill these objectives. He viewed the Economic Development Element as the document that provides him policy direction. Councilmember Johnson acknowledged there are GMA-required chapters and there are optional elements of which the City’s Comprehensive Plan has many such as the Sustainability Element and the Arts and Culture Element. She viewed the Economic Development Element as an optional element that only enhances the Comprehensive Plan. Councilmember Buckshnis did not favor rewriting or eliminate the Economic Development Element. Her Google search found at least 15 cities that address economic development in their Comprehensive Plan. Staff has done a very good job; the largest issue continues to be the BID. Mayor Earling reminded of the February 25 open house. The Economic Development Element will continue to be refined along with other Comprehensive Plan elements. 9. PRESENTATION OF CODE REVISION TO CHAPTER 18.80.060 – DRIVEWAY AND CURB CUT REQUIREMENTS City Engineer Rob English distributed a revised redline version of Chapter 18.80.060 in response to comments from City Attorney Jeff Taraday. He explained the City Attorney made changes to the code in 2010 to make the appeal process more clear. This section of the code, particularly the driveway slope waiver, was an administrative decision and appealable but did not have a notice requirement. That was changed in 2010. Staff felt requiring notice on a driveway slope waiver was a burden to private property owners and the initial scope of this change was to address that. He summarized the two areas of change, 1) eliminating the notice requirement on the driveway slope for a change of 14% to 20%, and 2) changing the width for residential driveways to match the current Edmonds details. Engineering Technician Jennifer Lambert explained a Type II notification requires mailing to property owners within 300 feet, publishing notice in the Everett Herald, posting the site and a $820 permit to cover staff time, mailing and publication. Other reason for change this change is driveways do not create a fire or safety concern but it is a minimum 2-week process for public notification. Typically final grading and driveway pavement is done at the end of the project and the Type II notification process can impact the timeline for closing of the sale, etc. She provided an example, many properties want a flat driveway at the entrance to the garage; driveway slope is not an average, it is a spot point on the driveway so a waiver Packet Page 17 of 344 is required if any point exceeds 14%. Driveway widths were revised to be consistent with Edmonds standard details, providing minimums and maximums for 2-car and 3-car garages. Section 18.80.060.C separates the information for commercial and residential. With regard to driveway slope waiver, Mr. English said the appeal process remains as shown in the last sentence of 18.80.060.D.4. The intent of the changes was to make the code easier to read and reorganized the commercial and residential sections. Although the recommendation in the agenda memo was to forward to the Consent Agenda, it is a gray area whether a public hearing needed. In talking with Mr. Taraday today, he felt it best to have a public hearing. It is at the Council discretion whether the public hearing is held by the Planning Board or the City Council. Councilmember Petso asked why this change was not delayed until the code rewrite. Mr. English responded from an administrative standpoint he preferred to make this minor change now. This change will also eliminate the $820 fee that a property owner is required to pay. Councilmember Petso observed the revisions to the driveway slope waiver remove the public notice but retain the appeal. She asked whether that created a situation where the public cannot appeal but applicant can. Mr. English answered no, most often it will be the property owner who will appeal the decision not to approve a driveway slope waiver but it does not prevent anyone from appealing. Mr. Taraday said it was true without notice an appeal was much less likely because there was no way to find out about the permit. It was staff’s sense that these are the type of permits that would only be appealed by the owner because no one was likely to care about their neighbor’s driveway slope. Councilmember Petso said one of the concerns with the Resolution 1005 was the potential for a snake road around the back of her neighborhood; she did not know whether that would be an access road or a driveway. She could envision having a heightened concern over what is a driveway and whether she will be notified if that the driveway is adjacent to her neighbors’ residences. Although in that situation the property is level, she could envision a situation where neighbors may want to know about driveway width, slope, etc. She was concerned with eliminating the notice provision and encouraged the Council to have a public hearing. With regard to changing driveway widths, Councilmember Petso recalled interest in keeping driveway widths narrow downtown to enhance the pedestrian environment. She wanted an opportunity to research why the current driveway widths were established and what would be lost if they were wider. She recalled driveway widths arose during review of the Westgate proposal Councilmember Bloom referred to language in Section 18.80.060B.1, “No driveway shall be so located as to create a hazard to pedestrians, bicyclists or motorists or invite or compel illegal or unsafe traffic movements.” She relayed the unpleasant experience walking along 9th to PCC due to driveway cuts in the curb and sidewalk that require walking sideways on the driveway, an uncomfortable experience for pedestrians, bicycles, wheelchairs, people using walkers, etc. Mr. English said none of proposed changes address that; the changes address the throat of the driveway which is the ramp from the sidewalk to the structure. Ms. Lambert said those driveways were built under old driveway standards; current standards for driveway approaches must meet ADA compliance. The slope addressed in the proposed code is from the back of sidewalk to the structure. The ADA requirement for driveway approaches is a 2% cross slope. Councilmember Petso asked where the City’s driveway standards were located. Mr. English referred to E2.2.6 in the development section of the code. To the question about commercial driveway widths, Mr. English explained there are pros and cons to small and large driveways depending on the situation. Driveways on SR 104 would tend to be wider due higher speeds; smaller driveways are desirable downtown. No changes are proposed in driveway widths. Staff’s intent was to clean up the section and make it easier to read. Packet Page 18 of 344 Councilmember Petso observed someone can currently request a wider driveway even downtown. Mr. English answered yes, a request for a 40-foot driveway would require the Type II notice requirement in accordance with Section 18.80.060.C.a. He clarified more than one lot is a short plat which requires public notification. Council President Fraley-Monillas suggested scheduling a public hearing at Council on March 17. Councilmember Petso requested a public hearing at Planning Board and Council; this is a complicated issue and the Council spent a lot of time on it years ago. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked the purpose of a public hearing at both the Planning Board and the City Council. She suggested sending it to the Planning Board for a public hearing and recommendation. If there was only one public hearing, Councilmember Petso requested it be at Council. She asked why Planning Board would not have an opportunity to discuss this. Mr. Taraday explained certain matters are required to go to the Planning Board; according to the City’s code this did not appear to be one of the required matters but it is within the Council’s discretion to send it to the Planning Board for discussion and recommendation. Councilmember Petso said it would be appropriate to send it to the Planning Board and possibly even the Economic Development Commission because there may be suggested changes based on the commercial area. Council President Fraley-Monillas asked whether staff had considered different areas. Mr. English explained the focus of this revision was removing notification for a driveway slope waiver to return the code to the way it was prior to the change in 2010. There will be a more in-depth code rewrite in the future. Councilmember Buckshnis did not see this as a difficult issue. It appeared all staff did was separate commercial from residential and remove the Type II notification. Mr. English agreed the intent was a small piece of the code rewrite to facilitate a smoother process. Councilmember Petso asked whether the change was made accidentally in 2010 and at what meeting that was discussed so she could review the minutes. Mr. English answered the inadvertent change occurred in fall 2010; he will provide the exact date. Public Works Director Williams said this typically addresses one driveway at a time, usually due to construction of a new house but sometimes the replacement of an existing driveway. The size of the project is generally very limited and the publication requirement seemed onerous. Posting the site would be a better way to handle notification of something of this size/magnitude instead of publication in a newspaper that few people would see. Councilmember Petso said one reason she was particularly concerned about this was the access options for potential lots near Restlawn Cemetery. In talking with her neighbors, none of them saw the property posting and only some received the 300-foot notice. She liked the requirement for mailed notice although she was sorry it was only 300 feet. Mr. Williams commented this is related to an individual driveway which is different than a short plat. Council President Fraley-Monillas recommended this be referred to the Planning Board for discussion and a public hearing. She did not see any reason for two public hearings. Councilmember Petso was glad there would be a public hearing but preferred it be at Council. Given Councilmember Petso’s concerns, Councilmember Bloom suggesting sending the proposed revisions to the Planning Board for discussion and then to Council for a public hearing. Packet Page 19 of 344 Councilmember Johnson asked whether the Council can approve a code change without a public hearing. Mr. Taraday recommended holding a public hearing because this falls within the definition of a development regulation which requires a public hearing. The code does not state where the public hearing occurs. It was the consensus of Council to refer this to Planning Board for discussion and for the Council to hold a public hearing. 10. PRESENTATION OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITIES OF LYNNWOOD AND MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ON CITY-WIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS City Engineer Rob English advised this covers a $1.9 million Verdant grant Edmonds, Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace received last year. The ILA proposes Lynnwood be the lead agency. Edmonds’ share of the grant, approximately $736,000, will provide approximately 3.6 miles of new bike lanes within Edmonds, bike route and corridor signage and public outreach and education within the three communities that will be led by Lynnwood. The locations of the proposed bike routes are outlined in Exhibit A: • 212th St SW - 84th to Hwy99 (Bike Lanes/Sharrows) • 76th Ave W - 208th to OVD (Bike Lanes) • 76th Ave W - 220th to 208th (Bike Lanes) • 220th St SW - 84th to 76th (Bike Lanes) • Dayton/9th/Bowdoin (Bike Route Signing) • 9th/80th (Bike Route Signing) • Improved Bicycle Signing (existing routes, 220th, 76th) • Improved Bicycle Signing (Interurban Trail and proximity) Staff recommends forwarding this to the Consent Agenda for approval. Councilmember Johnson concurred with staff’s recommendation. She thanked Verdant for the grant to provide bike lanes and missing links. Councilmember Bloom asked whether the outreach and education will occur in all three communities. Mr. English answered yes. Councilmember Bloom asked whether the before/after usage study would be coordinated with all three communities. Mr. English answered yes, Lynnwood will be the lead. Councilmember Bloom asked why there were no bike parking installations in Edmonds. Mr. English answered the focus was tie together corridors and routes identified in the Transportation Plan; bike parking installations was not scoped in Edmonds. Councilmember Bloom asked whether they could be added, noting there were ideal places along the routes. Mr. English answered potentially; it will depend on whether any extra funds are available. Councilmember Petso asked whether this agreement was related to the reduction of travel lanes on 76th. Mr. English answered yes, it was related to the road diet on 76th Avenue. Councilmember Petso recalled questions were raised at that time about traffic flow, how to get in/out of the high school and College Place Elementary. She recalled staff planned to return to Council once design was completed. Mr. English advised design work cannot begin until the ILA is approved. The queue at the entrance to the high school has been evaluated as part of the 76th/212th project; the latest proposal that the City and School District are working on is adding a new right turn lane into the high school. Modeling has been done and that appears to be the best solution. Consideration was also given to providing access off 216th but the modeling recommended a right turn lane to accommodate the queue. Packet Page 20 of 344 Councilmember Petso asked what happened if the solution for College Place or Edmonds-Woodway High School did not work and the City wanted to omit the 76th portion of the project at some point in the design phase; whether that be done or was the City committed once it accepted the grant money. Mr. English did not have a specific answer; that discussion would need to occur with Verdant. To address drop off traffic, he could envision the possibility of sharrows at College Place Elementary instead of dedicated bike lanes but that would be determined during the design. Mr. Williams answered the issue in that area was parking north of 208th. The modeling states a center turn lane and travel lanes in each direction provide a better flow. Councilmember Petso asked what happened if the project is done and the reduced travel lanes do not allow cars to get from 220th to 208th fast enough. She asked whether the City would be required to pay to undo the project. Mr. Williams did not see that as a possibility. The traffic modeling is clear that more cars can be moved through the area from 76th to 196th with a different geometry. The issues at Edmonds-Woodway High School are resolvable with a right turn lane. Further answers will be available once the ILA is in place and design begins. Councilmember Petso requested staff advise if it becomes apparent the design does not work. Mr. Williams said if there is a section where parking is required and dedicated bike lanes will not fit, there may be bike sharrows. Councilmember Buckshnis asked how the locations of the bike links were determined. Mr. English answered when the grant application was submitted, the three agencies included what they identified as the highest priority bike lane locations. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this on a future Consent Agenda. 11. PRESENTATION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE RECREATION AND CONSERVATION OFFICE (RCO) FOR $157,331 FOR THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING OF THE WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHTING PROJECT COUNCIL PRESIDENT FRALEY-MONILLAS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER PETSO, TO EXTEND THE MEETING TO 10:20 PM. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. City Engineer Rob English advised the City received a $157,000 grant to begin preliminary design and permitting to daylight Willows Creek. The work will begin this fall after the Marina Beach master planning is completed and continue into 2016. The estimated cost for preliminary design and permitting is $200,000. Mr. Williams advised this is being done in stages; the City received a small grant to begin the feasibility study, a more sizeable grant supplemented with stormwater funds and now this final feasibility study and environmental permitting. This will take the project to the point of qualifying for detailed design money for improvements to connect Puget Sound with the marsh. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this on a future Consent Agenda. 12. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF LYNNWOOD TO FORMALIZE ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND USAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED EMERGENCY INTERTIES THAT INTERCONNECT WATERMAINS BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDMONDS AND CITY OF LYNNWOOD City Engineer Rob English advised this ILA, 1) documents the existing water line interties with Lynnwood, and 2) proposes to build a 5th intertie to solve a service problem in the north end of the City. There are currently approximately 150 homes that have a single source of water service, an 8-inch line 2600 feet in length. If that line has a disruption, water service will be disrupted to those 150 homes. The Packet Page 21 of 344 installation of the fifth intertie will provide a second source of redundancy for that area and improve service if there are problems in the future. He recommended forwarding this item to the Consent Agenda. Mayor Earling asked the location of the interties. Mr. English referred to exhibit A which identifies the locations: 1. 21000 block of Highway 99 2. Intersection of 76th Ave W and 208th St SW 3. On Olympic View Drive approximately 170 feet west of intersection with 73rd Ave W 4. Intersection of Olympic View Drive and 180th St SW 5. On 68th Ave W north of the intersection of North Meadowdale Road It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this on a future Consent Agenda. 13. PRESENTATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE BLUELINE GROUP FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, ENGINEERING & INSPECTION SERVICES FOR 2015 City Engineer Rob English advised in 2014 staff presented a contract for construction management and inspection services with the Blueline Group. That was done through a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issued in 2014 for work to be completed in 2014 and 2015. This agreement is for support construction management on capital improvement work for sewer, water and stormwater in 2015. Approximately $7,000 is carryover work to close out projects. The bulk of the services Blueline Group provides is inspection; an inspector in the field during construction, doing daily reports, documenting what the contractor is doing, taking measurement quantities, reviewing contractor submittals, requests for information, scheduling material testing, etc. He highlighted changes from last year’s contract including an increase in the level of effort. Two sewer line projects went to construction last year; they were scoped for .25 FTE, anticipating staff could provide the remainder. Staff found gravity sewer and stormwater installations require nearly full-time inspection due to the potential for conflicts. The work is funded through the capital project budgets approved by the Council for 2015. Those projects are identify in the agenda memo; the two largest are the 2015 sewer line replacement project report and 2015 water line replacement projects which total $4.7 million, 2 stormwater projects on 105th/106th and the citywide storm drainage project. Councilmember Buckshnis inquired about a hold harmless clause. Mr. Williams answered the contract requires they carry their own errors and omissions insurance. Councilmember Petso said she was informed Blueline also did work related to Item 14 on tonight’s agenda and she was asked by a citizen whether there was a cozy relationship between Blueline and the City. She promised the citizen she would ask how Blueline was selected and whether there was any relationship between Agenda Item 14. Mr. English answered no, Blueline does work for developers which may be why they did work related to Agenda Item 14. The City’s selection process included issuing an RFQ in 2014 in accordance with the City purchasing policy. The City received 10-12 submittals which were reviewed and scored based on their qualifications and from that Blueline determined to be the top firm. Councilmember Petso recalled comments regarding this contract last year; the Council budgeted for a project manager and then was told this contract was required because the position had not been filled. She asked whether that position has been filled. Mr. English advised it has been filled but that was not the sole purpose for needing Blueline’s services. There is more work than there are FTEs in the engineering division. The contract did not hinge on filling one of the project management positions; the workload for the capital improvement program is double the biggest year 3-4 years ago. Staff is still needed to oversee Packet Page 22 of 344 and facilitate projects but additional effort is needed when projects go to construction to ensure they are built in accordance with plans and specifications. Mr. Williams added private development review is also very busy. In the past staff whose primary job was reviewing permit applications could be used for inspections but they are now fully committed to private development reviews. Councilmember Petso recalled contract services were needed due to the complexity of certain projects like the hospital and the fishing pier. With those projects completed, she questioned why contract services were needed. Mr. English answered there is a separate consultant for the fishing pier. A budget amendment was approved last year to fund Blueline inspections for the improvements at Swedish. Due to the volume of work, the development fees were used to contract with Blueline to provide support and inspection services. That was not part of the Blueline contract approved in May 2014. He recalled when the Blueline contract was presented in May 2014 he explained there was a high potential staff would return with a budget amendment before yearend. It was the consensus of the Council to schedule this on a future Consent Agenda. 15. REPORT ON OUTSIDE BOARDS AND COMMITTEES Councilmember Buckshnis reported the Lake Ballinger McAleer Creek Watershed Forum discussed the relationship between Edmonds, Lake Forest, Mountlake Terrace, and Snohomish County and toured the culvert replacement in the Nile Golf Course which has helped reduce flooding in that area. With her connection to WRIA 8, there may be an effort to obtain funds for salmon streams in Lake Forest Park. The Affordable Housing Consortium and Snohomish County Tomorrow are meeting tomorrow. SCT will be discussing its legislative agenda and the transportation packages. Councilmember Bloom read from the minutes of the January 26 Port Commission meeting: Mr. McChesney announced that that the City’s Shoreline Master Program was forwarded to the Department of Ecology on December 17th. Comment period was through to begin on January 17 but has been delayed. The Port is now in the process of putting together appeal materials that will be comprised of legal, scientific and economic opinion. He reported the work is coming together nicely. Councilmember Bloom reported the Port has allocated $25,000 to appeal the City’s Shoreline Master Program. Councilmember Bloom reported the February 9, 2015 Port Commission meeting included finalization of an agreement with Puget Sound Express to operate wildlife excursions/whale watching from the Port. Mr. McChesney reported he continued to work with the Port attorney and consultant to finalize the Port’s appeal of the City’s Shoreline Master Program. The meeting also included discussion regarding the restroom project. She read from the minutes regarding the delay in the restroom project while staff attempts to provide additional technical information the City requested for the shoreline permit. The building likely will not be ordered and installed until late 2015/early 2016. Commissioner Gouge stated the Port has gotten nothing but grief from the City in this endeavor and that is why no one wants to build in Edmonds anymore. He was inclined to stop the project and let the City of Edmonds find a way to provide restrooms for its citizens. The Port also discussed the alternatives study and Commissioner Orvis relayed his understanding the Mayor is considering approaching the Commission with a request that the Port contribute and become a partner at least in name to enhance the potential of receiving grant funding to conduct the analysis. She suggested Councilmembers read the minutes regarding that discussion. Councilmember Bloom reported the January 21 Economic Development Commission (EDC) meeting included an update from the Business District Enhancement Subgroup. She noted up to four staff members attend EDC meetings and 2-3 staff participate on the Business District Enhancement Subgroup. In contrast, the Tree Board continues to function without any staff support. The EDC brainstormed ideas for 2014 which included finding a company to rent cars to those traveling by train and it was suggested Packet Page 23 of 344 the commission discuss with Council what they would like the EDC to do this year and in the future if the EDC is not sunseted. Councilmember Petso agreed the Tree Board meeting did not have a staff representative. Using a consultant, the Tree Board developed a Tree Code that will be reviewed by the Planning Board before coming to the Council. The Tree Board is also working on a list of trees for rights of-way. Councilmember Petso reported on the Regional Transit Oriented Development Group meeting (Growing Transit Communities) that she attended remotely. It appears by joining Growing Transit Communities the City agreed to their program as well as Sound Transit’s 2015 legislative agenda. Councilmember Petso reported the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) plans to bring a property to the Council for listing on the historic registry. The HPC is working on a calendar, but may need a budget amendment. She reported the February 23 EDC meeting included a presentation from Doug Spee who is developing the post office building. She recommended Council review the presentation via the meeting audio or the minutes. As reported by Mr. Hertrich, several members of the EDC were surprised to find the report to Council would not include their input. Due to the late hour Councilmember Johnson and Council President Fraley-Monillas offered to delay their reports to next week. Mayor Earling reported four finalists for the Community Transit CEO position will be interviewed on Friday. 16. DISCUSSION REGARDING CODE OF ETHICS Council President Fraley-Monillas distributed a revised version. Due to the late hour, this item was postponed to a future meeting. 17. MAYOR'S COMMENTS Mayor Earling reported when the fire station was built on 196th several years ago, the City has first right of refusal on the property to the east. The City has been asked by the property owner whether the City intends to exercise that right of refusal. The property owner has an offer on the property so the Council should make a decision as soon as possible. He noted a real estate executive session scheduled at the beginning of tonight’s meeting was canceled on the advice of Mr. Taraday because the Council would not be discussing price because the price was fixed in the first right of refusal. Mr. Taraday advised the 45- day period commences upon the delivery of the notice and a copy of the offer. The City received notice and a letter from the purchaser but he was uncertain the letter constituted the offer. An argument could be made that the 45 days has not started but he encouraged the Council to act quickly in determining whether there was interest in exercising the first right of refusal. Mayor Earling advised further information would be provided to Council this week via email. 18. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Bloom reminded of the open house on the Comprehensive Plan in the Brackett Room of City Hall on February 25 from 5 to 7 p.m. The open house will also include the SR 104 Complete Streets analysis for the Westgate portion of the SR 104 corridor study. She requested it be presented in another format and noticed in a way that people who are interested in Westgate could attend. She preferred it be noticed more formally instead of lumped together with the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Earling suggested she make that request to Ms. Hope. Packet Page 24 of 344 Councilmember Bloom reported the Council retreat is scheduled to be held in Lynnwood; she does not support holding the Council retreat outside the City of Edmonds and a number of citizens have objected to that in the past. Councilmember Petso asked whether the open house had been noticed as a public meeting in the event several Councilmembers attended. City Clerk Scott Passey advised it had not been noticed as a special Council meeting. As it is a City-sponsored meeting that relates to City business, Mr. Taraday discouraged four or more Councilmembers from attending as there was not sufficient time to provide special meeting notice. Councilmember Petso said she planned to attend the open house. Councilmember Johnson said as a member of the SR 104 Complete Streets Technical Advisory Committee, she has been asked to attend the open house. She announced the Planning Board’s regular meeting will follow the open house and will include the draft Tree Code and recommendations for SR 104. Council President Fraley-Monillas announced she planned to attend the open house. 19. CONVENE IN EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) This item was not needed. 20. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION. POTENTIAL ACTION AS A RESULT OF MEETING IN EXECUTIVE SESSION This item was not needed. 21. ADJOURN With no further business, the Council meeting was adjourned at 10:33 p.m. Packet Page 25 of 344    AM-7526     3. B.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:Consent   Submitted For:Scott James Submitted By:Nori Jacobson Department:Finance Review Committee: Committee Action:  Type: Action  Information Subject Title Approval of claim checks #213005 through #213121 dated February 26, 2015 for $560,279.01. Approval of payroll replacement check #61519 for $12.33. Recommendation Approval of claim and payroll checks. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In accordance with the State statutes, City payments must be approved by the City Council. Ordinance #2896 delegates this approval to the Council President who reviews and recommends either approval or non-approval of expenditures. Fiscal Impact Fiscal Year:2015 Revenue: Expenditure:560,279.01 Fiscal Impact: Claims $560,279.01 Payroll replacement check $12.33 Attachments Claim checks 02-26-15 Project Numbers 02-26-15 Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Finance Debra Sharp 02/26/2015 09:09 AM Packet Page 26 of 344 Finance Debra Sharp 02/26/2015 09:09 AM City Clerk Scott Passey 02/26/2015 09:11 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/26/2015 10:24 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/27/2015 07:00 AM Form Started By: Nori Jacobson Started On: 02/26/2015 08:26 AM Final Approval Date: 02/27/2015  Packet Page 27 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 1 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213005 2/26/2015 070322 A&A LANGUAGE SERVICES INC 14-18013 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 3,285.33 Total :3,285.33 213006 2/26/2015 065737 ADI D63WJ101 City Hall - Supplies City Hall - Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 110.49 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 10.50 Total :120.99 213007 2/26/2015 000850 ALDERWOOD WATER DISTRICT 9634 MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES MONTHLY WHOLESALE WATER CHARGES 421.000.74.534.80.33.00 96,887.49 Total :96,887.49 213008 2/26/2015 065568 ALLWATER INC 021915065 WWTP - DRINKING WATER water 423.000.76.535.80.31.00 38.15 Total :38.15 213009 2/26/2015 064246 ALS LABORATORY GROUP 32-EV15020030-0 Storm - Pine Street Spill Cleanup Storm - Pine Street Spill Cleanup 422.000.72.531.40.41.00 190.00 Total :190.00 213010 2/26/2015 001528 AM TEST INC 84873 WWTP - MERCURY TEST sludge metals testing 423.000.76.535.80.41.31 75.00 Total :75.00 213011 2/26/2015 074840 AMERICAN FOREST MANAGEMENT 76866 Street - 757 Main Tree Assesment Street - 757 Main Tree Assesment 111.000.68.542.90.41.00 250.00 1Page: Packet Page 28 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 2 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :250.002130112/26/2015 074840 074840 AMERICAN FOREST MANAGEMENT 213012 2/26/2015 075165 ARAIZA, ABRAHAM 2/17 REFUND DEP 2/17 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 2/17 REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 001.000.239.200 450.00 Total :450.00 213013 2/26/2015 069751 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 1987877417 WWTP - UNIFORMS, MATS, & TOWELS uniforms 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 3.80 mats & towels 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 70.94 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 0.36 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.41.11 6.74 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE1987877418 PARKS MAINT UNIFORM SERVICE 001.000.64.576.80.24.00 117.95 Total :199.79 213014 2/26/2015 070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 79600 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS UB Outsourcing area #800 printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 115.60 UB Outsourcing area #800 printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 115.60 UB Outsourcing area #800 printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 119.09 UB Outsourcing area # 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 422.60 UB Outsourcing area # 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 422.59 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 10.98 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 10.98 2Page: Packet Page 29 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 3 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213014 2/26/2015 (Continued)070305 AUTOMATIC FUNDS TRANSFER 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 11.32 OUT SOURCING OF UTILITY BILLS79683 UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 91.56 UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 91.56 UB Outsourcing area #100 Printing 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 94.33 UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 334.07 UB Outsourcing area #100 Postage 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 334.06 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.49.00 7.91 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 7.91 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 10.54 Total :2,200.70 213015 2/26/2015 002170 BARTON, RONALD 14 LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,649.79 Total :1,649.79 213016 2/26/2015 074307 BLUE STAR GAS 3294 Fleet Auto Propane - 169.5 Gal Fleet Auto Propane - 169.5 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 153.64 Fleet Auto Propane 316.8 Gal3373 Fleet Auto Propane 316.8 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 235.23 Fleet Auto Propane 322.6 Gal3396 Fleet Auto Propane 322.6 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 239.38 3Page: Packet Page 30 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 4 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213016 2/26/2015 (Continued)074307 BLUE STAR GAS Fleet Auto Propane 249.4 Gal3417 Fleet Auto Propane 249.4 Gal 511.000.77.548.68.34.12 186.99 Total :815.24 213017 2/26/2015 065739 BOBBY WOLFORD TRUCKING &1788 Storm Dump Fees Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 320.00 Storm Dump Fees1797 Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 120.00 Storm Dump Fees1871 Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 198.00 Total :638.00 213018 2/26/2015 018495 CALPORTLAND COMPANY 92352037 Water - Gravel Water - Gravel 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 104.49 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.93 Total :114.42 213019 2/26/2015 073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 14629741 Lease - Council Office copier/printer Lease - Council Office copier/printer 001.000.11.511.60.45.00 30.65 CANON COPIER CHARGES14629742 Canon copier charges for C1030 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 9.33 Canon copier charges for C1030 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 9.33 Canon copier charges for C1030 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 9.33 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.61.557.20.45.00 0.89 4Page: Packet Page 31 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 5 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213019 2/26/2015 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.22.518.10.45.00 0.89 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.21.513.10.45.00 0.88 INV 14629745 CUST 572105 EDMONDS PD14629745 COPIER RENTAL DUE 3/1/05 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 581.60 COPY CHARGES 1/1-1/31/15 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 260.06 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.45.00 79.97 CITY CLERK'S COPIER LEASE14629746 CITY CLERK'S COPIER LEASE 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 466.97 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 44.36 PARKS & REC COPIER IRC5051 CONTRACT 001-14629747 PARKS & REC COPIER IRC5051 CONTRACT 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 273.74 RECEPTIONIST DESK COPIER LEASE14629748 RECEPTIONIST DESK COPIER LEASE 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 20.11 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 1.91 LEASE- PLANNING DIVISION PRINTER14629749 Lease- Planning division printer 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 36.16 LEASE- BUILDING DIVISION PRINTER14629750 Lease- Bldg Div Printer 001.000.62.524.10.45.00 36.16 P & REC PRINTER IRC1030IF CONTRACT 001-014629751 P & REC PRINTER IRC1030IF CONTRACT 001.000.64.571.21.45.00 30.65 FLEET COPIER14636401 5Page: Packet Page 32 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 6 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213019 2/26/2015 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES Fleet Copier 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 33.02 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 3.14 PW ADMIN COPIER14636402 PW Office Copier for 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 68.55 PW Office Copier for 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 38.85 PW Office Copier for 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 38.85 PW Office Copier for 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 27.42 PW Office Copier for 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 27.42 PW Office Copier for 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 27.41 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.45.00 6.51 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.45.00 3.69 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.45.00 3.69 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 2.61 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 2.61 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.45.00 2.59 WATER SEWER COPIER14636403 Water Sewer Copier 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 70.68 Water Sewer Copier 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 70.68 6Page: Packet Page 33 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 7 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213019 2/26/2015 (Continued)073029 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.45.00 6.72 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.45.00 6.71 PARKS MAINT PRINTER IRC1030IF SCHEDULE14636404 PARKS MAINT PRINTER IRC1030IF SCHEDULE 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 36.16 WWTP - COPIER RENTAL14651655 Copier Rental - February 2015 423.000.76.535.80.45.41 85.80 Total :2,456.10 213020 2/26/2015 070334 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS STORES 2523-242368 Unit 31 - Filters Unit 31 - Filters 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 18.50 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.76 Unit 31 - Filters2523-242425 Unit 31 - Filters 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 32.22 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 3.06 Unit 63 - Filters2523-242858 Unit 63 - Filters 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 46.76 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 4.44 Unit 400 - Oil Filter2523-243204 Unit 400 - Oil Filter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.98 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.66 Unit 379 - Coil2523-243838 Unit 379 - Coil 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 69.41 7Page: Packet Page 34 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 8 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213020 2/26/2015 (Continued)070334 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS STORES 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.59 Unit 131 - Hinge Pin and Bushing Kit2523-243909 Unit 131 - Hinge Pin and Bushing Kit 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 7.30 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 0.69 Unit 400 - Brake Rotor2523-244153 Unit 400 - Brake Rotor 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 15.98 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.52 Total :215.87 213021 2/26/2015 068484 CEMEX LLC 9430139113 Roadway - Asphalt Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 284.30 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 27.01 Roadway - Asphalt9430147464 Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 175.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 16.63 Storm Dump Fees9430155473 Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 217.36 Roadway - Asphalt9430176925 Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 360.60 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 34.26 Roadway - Asphalt9430184264 Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 290.60 8Page: Packet Page 35 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 9 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213021 2/26/2015 (Continued)068484 CEMEX LLC 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 27.61 Roadway - Asphalt9430190761 Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 232.80 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 22.12 Roadway - Asphalt9430200391 Roadway - Asphalt 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 359.90 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.31.31.00 34.20 Storm Dump Fees9430228561 Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 268.44 Storm Dump Fees9430228562 Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 417.65 Storm Dump Fees9430235428 Storm Dump Fees 422.000.72.531.10.49.00 451.10 Total :3,219.58 213022 2/26/2015 003510 CENTRAL WELDING SUPPLY LY 217063 PM CUTOFF WHL, POLIFAN, BATTERIES PM CUTOFF WHL, POLIFAN, BATTERIES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 39.27 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.73 Total :43.00 213023 2/26/2015 004867 COOPER, JACK F 15 LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement 617.000.51.517.20.23.00 239.92 Total :239.92 9Page: Packet Page 36 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 10 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213024 2/26/2015 068161 COSCO FIRE PROTECTION INC 1000279780 PS - Annual Monitoring Fees PS - Annual Monitoring Fees 001.000.66.518.30.48.00 393.25 Total :393.25 213025 2/26/2015 005965 CUES INC 423936 Sewer - Camera Repairs Sewer - Camera Repairs 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 100.00 Parts and Shipping 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 96.73 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 9.21 E4FF.PIGTAILS FOR DUC CAMERA426473 E4FF.Pigtails for DUC Camera 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 414.02 E4FF.Handling charges 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 2.95 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 39.61 Total :662.52 213026 2/26/2015 006200 DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE 3297011 E5JA.RFQ ADVERTISEMENT E5JA.RFQ Advertisement 421.000.74.594.34.41.10 405.60 HISTORIC RECON SURVEY NOTICES3297300 HISTORIC RECON SURVEY NOTICES 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 226.20 Total :631.80 213027 2/26/2015 046150 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 171569 Sr Center - Annual Cert 2015 Sr Center - Annual Cert 2015 001.000.66.518.30.49.00 129.00 Total :129.00 213028 2/26/2015 069030 DETECTION INSTRUMENTS CORP 3660-29495 WWTP - L2 CALIBRATION L2 Calibrate 10Page: Packet Page 37 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 11 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213028 2/26/2015 (Continued)069030 DETECTION INSTRUMENTS CORP 423.000.76.535.80.41.22 47.50 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.41.22 10.30 Total :57.80 213029 2/26/2015 073757 DEX MEDIA WEST INC 651150804 CEMETERY ADVERTISING CEMETERY ADVERTISING 130.000.64.536.20.41.40 63.38 Total :63.38 213030 2/26/2015 074492 EARTHCORPS 5102ES 317-14-01 WILLOW CREEK DAYLIGHT PROJECT TASK 1: GENERAL PROJECT MGMT AND ADMIN 125.000.64.575.50.41.00 2,062.50 Total :2,062.50 213031 2/26/2015 070884 EARTHWORK ENTERPRISES INC E4JA.Pmt 6 E4JA.PMT 6 THRU 1/30/15 E4JA.Pmt 6 thru 1/30/15 421.000.74.594.34.65.10 166,885.81 Total :166,885.81 213032 2/26/2015 007675 EDMONDS AUTO PARTS 45005 PM FUEL FIL, OIL FILTER, FUEL/WATER SEPA PM FUEL FIL, OIL FILTER, FUEL/WATER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 74.89 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 7.11 WWTP - SUPPLIES, MECHANICAL45007 4pc premium rubber ring 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 34.99 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 3.32 Total :120.31 213033 2/26/2015 071969 EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS 2/7 KIDSTOCK SPONS 2/7/15 KIDSTOCK ARTIST SPONSORSHIP 2/7/15 KIDSTOCK ARTIST SPONSORSHIP 117.100.64.573.20.41.00 1,500.00 11Page: Packet Page 38 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 12 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :1,500.002130332/26/2015 071969 071969 EDMONDS CENTER FOR THE ARTS 213034 2/26/2015 074302 EDMONDS HARDWARE & PAINT LLC 000606 Fac Maint - Old PW - Repair Kit Fac Maint - Old PW - Repair Kit 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 17.99 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 1.71 Total :19.70 213035 2/26/2015 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 1-00655 LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST / METER 7 LIFT STATION #7 71 W DAYTON ST / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 41.02 LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AVE / METER1-00925 LIFT STATION #8 107 RAILROAD AVE / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 41.02 LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE / METER 91-01950 LIFT STATION #1 450 SUNSET AVE / METER 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 37.77 OLD PUBLIC WORKS (NORTH) 200 DAYTON ST /1-03950 OLD PUBLIC WORKS 200 DAYTON ST / METER 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 551.03 OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200 DAYTON ST /1-05350 OLD PUBLIC WORKS (SOUTH) 200 DAYTON ST 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 84.47 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER 92371-05705 LIFT STATION #6 100 PINE ST / METER 9237 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 76.88 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 690138971-13975 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 69013897 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 527.73 CITY HALL 115 5TH AVE N / METER 24351-14000 CITY HALL 115 5TH AVE N / METER 2435 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 95.37 LIFT STATION #14 7909 211TH PL SW / METE4-34080 LIFT STATION #14 7909 211TH PL SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 37.77 12Page: Packet Page 39 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 13 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :1,493.062130352/26/2015 008705 008705 EDMONDS WATER DIVISION 213036 2/26/2015 031060 ELECSYS INTERNATIONAL CORP 132625 RADIX MONTHLY MAINT AGREEMENT Radix Monthly Maint Agreement - 421.000.74.534.80.48.00 152.00 Total :152.00 213037 2/26/2015 008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 108344 WATER SEWER COPY USE Water Sewer Copy Use~ 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 5.31 Water Sewer Copy Use~ 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 5.31 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 0.51 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 0.50 WWTP - OFFICE MACHINE USE110226 01/07/15 to 02/07/15 423.000.76.535.80.45.41 79.60 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.45.41 7.56 WATER SEWER COPY USE110275 Water Sewer Copy Use~ 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 94.85 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 9.01 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 9.01 Water Sewer Copy Use~ 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 94.85 PW COPY USE110286 PW Copy Use~ 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 28.86 PW Copy Use~ 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 16.36 PW Copy Use~ 13Page: Packet Page 40 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 14 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213037 2/26/2015 (Continued)008812 ELECTRONIC BUSINESS MACHINES 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 16.36 PW Copy Use~ 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 11.55 PW Copy Use~ 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 11.55 PW Copy Use~ 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.53 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 2.74 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 1.55 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 1.55 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 1.10 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 1.10 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.10 ZSYST MK0315 PRINTER MAINTENANCE110324 Maintenance for printers 02/21/15 - 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 343.98 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 32.68 METER READING 01/21/15-02/21/15110360 METER READING 01/21/15-02/21/15 001.000.25.514.30.45.00 15.01 FLEET COPY USE110366 Fleet Copy Use~ 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 11.96 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1.14 Total :816.63 213038 2/26/2015 008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES 19651 FRIDAY DANCE 19651 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE INSTRUCTOR FEE 14Page: Packet Page 41 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 15 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213038 2/26/2015 (Continued)008969 ENGLAND, CHARLES 19651 FRIDAY NIGHT DANCE INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 360.00 Total :360.00 213039 2/26/2015 009350 EVERETT DAILY HERALD EDH612639 E5FB.RFQ ADVERTISEMENT E5FB.RFQ Advertisement 422.000.72.594.31.41.20 185.76 LEGAL DISCRIPTION PLN20140075EDH614548 LEGAL DISCRIPTION PLN20140075 001.000.62.558.60.41.40 86.00 Total :271.76 213040 2/26/2015 009410 EVERETT STEEL INC 78526 Traffic - Alum Angles Traffic - Alum Angles 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 87.00 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 8.27 Total :95.27 213041 2/26/2015 009332 EVERETT TENT & AWNING 4552 Storm - Tarps Storm - Tarps 422.000.72.531.10.31.00 504.00 9.2% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.10.31.00 46.37 Total :550.37 213042 2/26/2015 066378 FASTENAL COMPANY WAMOU34692 Shop Supplies Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 134.13 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 12.74 Storm - PartsWAMOU34693 Storm - Parts 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 31.11 9.5% Sales Tax 15Page: Packet Page 42 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 16 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213042 2/26/2015 (Continued)066378 FASTENAL COMPANY 422.000.72.531.40.31.00 2.96 Total :180.94 213043 2/26/2015 075168 FBCI 1625056-77400703 FBC 201 PLACEMAKING WITH FORM BASED CO event- FBC 201 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 650.00 Total :650.00 213044 2/26/2015 009815 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC 3241240 PM PVC COUP PM PVC COUP 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 24.40 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 2.32 Total :26.72 213045 2/26/2015 075015 FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING 5601321501 INV 5601321501 ACCT 941978 EDMONDS PD CREDIT CHECK - ENTRY LEVEL CANDIDATE 001.000.41.521.10.41.00 9.00 Total :9.00 213046 2/26/2015 011900 FRONTIER 253-007-4989 SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE SEAVIEW RESERVOIR TELEMETRY CIRCUIT 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 29.02 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES253-012-9166 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 151.72 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINES 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 281.76 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE253-014-8062 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 18.53 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 34.42 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE253-017-4360 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 16Page: Packet Page 43 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 17 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213046 2/26/2015 (Continued)011900 FRONTIER 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 43.86 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 81.46 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE425-712-0417 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 32.22 TELEMETRY CIRCUIT LINE 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 32.21 PUBLIC WORKS OMC ALARM, FAX, SPARE LINES425-712-8251 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 001.000.65.518.20.42.00 16.14 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 80.69 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 67.78 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 67.78 PUBLIC WORKS OMC FIRE AND INTRUSION 511.000.77.548.68.42.00 90.36 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE LINE425-712-8347 CIVIC CENTER ELEVATOR PHONE LINE 250 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 66.02 CIVIC CENTER ALARM LINES 250 5TH AVE N425-775-2455 CIVIC CENTER FIRE AND INTRUSION ALARM 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 60.43 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER ALARM LINE425-776-3896 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER FIRE AND 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 128.11 Total :1,282.51 213047 2/26/2015 075163 GARCIA-GARCIA, CESAR 7457 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.23.523.30.41.01 105.64 INTERPRETER FEE7499 INTERPRETER FEE 17Page: Packet Page 44 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 18 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213047 2/26/2015 (Continued)075163 GARCIA-GARCIA, CESAR 001.000.23.512.50.41.01 105.64 Total :211.28 213048 2/26/2015 011910 GEOLINE BELLEVUE 329513 Storm - Juno 3B Storm - Juno 3B 422.000.72.531.40.35.00 719.00 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.40.35.00 68.31 Total :787.31 213049 2/26/2015 012199 GRAINGER 9658997490 PS - Motor Supplies PS - Motor Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 124.90 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 11.87 Total :136.77 213050 2/26/2015 075164 GROWING SYSTEMS INC 90169 PARKS GREENHOUSE SEEDER PARKS GREENHOUSE SEEDER 001.000.64.576.80.35.00 4,417.06 Total :4,417.06 213051 2/26/2015 012560 HACH COMPANY 9235656 WWTP - SUPPLIES, LAB supplies 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 133.50 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 12.69 Total :146.19 213052 2/26/2015 075166 HELMUT & LOIS RUEB 8-13050 #6CHOB/.01 UTILITY REFUND #6CHOB/.01 Utility refund - received 411.000.233.000 81.51 Total :81.51 213053 2/26/2015 067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 1011770 PM SUPPLIES PM SUPPLIES: WREC BLD, TORCH BLADE, HEX 18Page: Packet Page 45 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 19 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213053 2/26/2015 (Continued)067862 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 207.87 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 19.75 PM SUPPLIES: DRILL BITS, RATCHET1021045 PM SUPPLIES: DRILL BITS, RATCHET 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 69.23 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 6.58 PM GALVWAHSER, SCREW, FENCE BRKT1023041 PM GALVWAHSER, SCREW, FENCE BRKT 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 51.25 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 4.87 PM SUPPLIES1063019 PM SUPPLIES: KNEEPAD, PRUNER, SAW, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 237.59 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 22.57 PM CADDY, M18-3AH2PK, 8" SCREW3023958 PM CADDY, M18-3AH2PK, 8" SCREW 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 169.52 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 16.10 PM TOOL BAGS, WIREGALV183071318 PM TOOL BAGS, WIREGALV18 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 34.22 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.25 PM SUPPLIES9051051 PM SUPPLIES: H3D18SWS, 10PCRWSAE, 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 117.85 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 11.20 Total :971.85 19Page: Packet Page 46 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 20 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213054 2/26/2015 073548 INDOFF INCORPORATED 2583223 TASK CHAIR- ENG TASK CHAIR- ENG 001.000.62.524.10.35.00 268.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.35.00 25.46 WWTP - SUPPLIES, OFFICE2585421 calculators and pendaflex sorter 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 98.94 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 9.40 WWTP - SUPPLIES, OFFICE2585457 pens 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 26.66 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.41 2.54 WRITING PADS2586881 SKILCRAFT Writing Pads - 8.5x11 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 45.03 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.31.514.23.31.00 4.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES- DEV SERV2588436 stapler 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 76.13 monitor riser 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 50.75 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.524.10.31.00 12.05 SUPPLIES2589272 SUPPLIES 001.000.23.523.30.31.00 117.30 Total :736.54 213055 2/26/2015 069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS 000040702 Shop Supplies Shop Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 281.96 Freight 20Page: Packet Page 47 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 21 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213055 2/26/2015 (Continued)069040 INTERSTATE AUTO PARTS 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 11.90 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.20 27.92 Total :321.78 213056 2/26/2015 014940 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 523499 Unit 124 - Batteries Unit 124 - Batteries 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 102.45 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.73 Unit 132 - Batteries523570 Unit 132 - Batteries 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 227.44 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 21.61 Total :361.23 213057 2/26/2015 065947 INTL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE 2015 MEMBERSHIP DILL 2015 MEMBERSHIP DILL PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIP $130, PACIFIC 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 180.00 ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST APPLICATION-DILLISA CERTIF ARBORIST ISA CERTIFICATION FEE FOR MEMBER $150, 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 250.00 Total :430.00 213058 2/26/2015 070192 JA SEXAUER 328911953 FAC - Single Temp Meter Faucet FAC - Single Temp Meter Faucet 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 171.90 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 16.33 Total :188.23 213059 2/26/2015 015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 645803 WWTP - SUPPLIES, HYPOCHLORITE hypochlorite, 4716 gallons 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 3,156.18 21Page: Packet Page 48 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 22 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213059 2/26/2015 (Continued)015270 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.53 299.84 Total :3,456.02 213060 2/26/2015 075167 JORGENSON COMPANIES SI16273 WWTP - C411 LOCKERS lockers 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 451.50 Freight 423.100.76.594.39.65.10 105.00 Total :556.50 213061 2/26/2015 075137 KELAYE CONCRETE LLC E3DE.Pmt 2 E3DE.PMT 2 THRU 2/2/15 E3DE.Pmt 2 thru 2/2/15 112.200.68.595.33.65.00 43,193.49 E3DE.Ret 2 112.200.223.400 -2,159.67 Total :41,033.82 213062 2/26/2015 071137 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER 19697 KIDZ LOVE SOCC 19697 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 19697 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 223.20 19698 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE19698 KIDZ LOVE SOCC 19698 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 334.80 19699 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE19699 KIDZ LOVE SOCC 19699 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 372.00 19700 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE19700 KIDZ LOVE SOCC 19700 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.25.41.00 186.00 Total :1,116.00 213063 2/26/2015 067568 KPG INC 112715 E3DB.SERVICES THRU 1/25/15 E3DB.Services thru 1/25/15 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 5,365.12 22Page: Packet Page 49 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 23 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213063 2/26/2015 (Continued)067568 KPG INC E3DD.SERVICES THRU 1/25/15112815 E3DD.Services thru 1/25/15 112.200.68.595.33.41.00 5,383.66 Total :10,748.78 213064 2/26/2015 016850 KUKER RANKEN INC INV-008058 24X300 COPIER PAPER 24X300 COPIER PAPER 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 120.80 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.62.558.60.49.00 11.48 Total :132.28 213065 2/26/2015 067631 LODESTAR COMPANY INC 139955 WWTP - PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, FACILITIES HVAC service 423.000.76.535.80.48.23 490.02 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.48.23 46.55 Total :536.57 213066 2/26/2015 018980 LYNNWOOD HONDA 896978 Unit M16 - Filters Unit M16 - Filters 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 95.12 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 9.04 Total :104.16 213067 2/26/2015 072992 LYNNWOOD ICE CENTER 19639 ICE SKATE 19639 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE 19639 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 357.00 19640 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE19640 ICE SKATE 19640 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 178.50 19643 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE19643 ICE SKATE 19643 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 297.50 23Page: Packet Page 50 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 24 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213067 2/26/2015 (Continued)072992 LYNNWOOD ICE CENTER 19644 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE19644 ICE SKATE 19644 LEARN TO ICE SKATE INSTRUCTOR FEE 001.000.64.571.22.41.00 535.50 Total :1,368.50 213068 2/26/2015 074263 LYNNWOOD WINSUPPLY CO 006745-00 PM KNOBBY TIRE & WHEEL, RAKE ALUM PM KNOBBY TIRE & WHEEL, RAKE ALUM 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 159.38 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 15.14 Total :174.52 213069 2/26/2015 019582 MANOR HARDWARE 607076-00 Traffic - Supplies Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 15.96 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1.52 Traffic - Supplies607471-00 Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 14.64 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 1.39 Total :33.51 213070 2/26/2015 069362 MARSHALL, CITA 1598 INTERPRETER FEE INTERPRETER FEE 001.000.39.512.52.41.00 86.90 Total :86.90 213071 2/26/2015 019920 MCCANN, MARIAN 13 LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.29.00 8,526.25 Total :8,526.25 213072 2/26/2015 020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 21859233 WWTP - SMALL EQUIPMENT 24Page: Packet Page 51 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 25 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213072 2/26/2015 (Continued)020039 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO Telescopic Ladder 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 387.14 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.35.00 87.57 WWTP - SUPPLIES, MECHANIC22772679 sanding discs 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 143.63 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 6.59 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, MECHANICAL22874681 pressure regulator 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 223.98 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 7.57 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, MECHANICAL2288799 bar steel, fittings and valves 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 487.09 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 34.96 WWTP - SUPPLIES, MECHANIC22913899 bushings and couplings 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 560.20 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.21 14.68 Total :1,953.41 213073 2/26/2015 021983 MOTOR TRUCKS INC ME72787 Unit 11 - Transmitter Unit 11 - Transmitter 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 131.16 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.46 Total :143.62 213074 2/26/2015 072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 14-1590-6 E4GA.SERVICES THRU 1/31/15 E4GA.Services thru 1/31/15 25Page: Packet Page 52 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 26 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213074 2/26/2015 (Continued)072746 MURRAY SMITH & ASSOCIATES 423.000.75.594.35.41.30 24,358.00 Total :24,358.00 213075 2/26/2015 064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 0396853-IN Water Sewer - Boots Water Sewer - Boots 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 92.60 Water Sewer - Boots 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 92.60 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 8.81 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 8.79 Sewer - LS 8 - CH4 Sensor0396926-IN Sewer - LS 8 - CH4 Sensor 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 1,400.00 Freight 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 10.87 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 134.04 Street Storm - Work Gloves, Rain Gear0397199-IN Street Storm - Work Gloves, Rain Gear 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 355.35 Street Storm - Work Gloves, Rain Gear 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 355.35 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 33.76 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 33.76 Storm - Work Jacket0398106-IN Storm - Work Jacket 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 39.45 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 3.74 Storm outer ware0398120-IN Storm outer ware 26Page: Packet Page 53 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 27 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213075 2/26/2015 (Continued)064570 NATIONAL SAFETY INC 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 88.15 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 8.37 Total :2,665.64 213076 2/26/2015 024001 NC MACHINERY SECS0597671 Unit 63 - Oil Supplies Unit 63 - Oil Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 288.37 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 27.40 Total :315.77 213077 2/26/2015 074306 NEBCO/NPRIT 3580766 LEOFF 1 Medical Premuims LEOFF 1 Medical Premuims 617.000.51.517.20.23.10 1,310.62 LEOFF 1 Medical Premiums 009.000.39.517.20.23.10 9,032.24 Total :10,342.86 213078 2/26/2015 024302 NELSON PETROLEUM 0543804-IN WWTP - SUPPLIES, OPERATING Analysis kit C4PC - Chevron 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 864.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.11 82.08 Total :946.08 213079 2/26/2015 066391 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 59306 WWTP - SODIUM BISULFITE sodium bisulfite 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 1,105.00 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.54 104.98 Total :1,209.98 213080 2/26/2015 061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 2-1132251 SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET SIERRA PARK HONEY BUCKET 27Page: Packet Page 54 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 28 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213080 2/26/2015 (Continued)061013 NORTHWEST CASCADE INC 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 113.85 MADRONA ELEMENTARY HONEY BUCKET2-1132490 MADRONA ELEMENTARY HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 113.85 MARINA BEACH PARK HONEY BUCKET2-1133843 MARINA BEACH PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 600.05 PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKET2-1134750 PINE STREET PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 113.85 CIVIC CENTER HONEY BUCKET2-1135635 CIVIC CENTER HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 113.85 CIVIC FIELD HONEY BUCKET2-1136827 CIVIC FIELD HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 113.85 HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUCKET2-1138410 HAINES WHARF PARK HONEY BUCKET 001.000.64.576.80.45.00 218.78 Total :1,388.08 213081 2/26/2015 073012 NORTHWEST SIGN RECYCLING 1985 Traffic - Hydrostripping Signs Traffic - Hydrostripping Signs 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 321.43 Total :321.43 213082 2/26/2015 025690 NOYES, KARIN 000 00 539 PLANNING BOARD MINUTETAKER 2/11/15 PLANNING BOARD MINUTETAKER 2/11/15 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 459.00 HPC MINUTES000 00 540 HPC MINUTES 001.000.62.558.60.41.00 153.00 Total :612.00 213083 2/26/2015 063511 OFFICE MAX INC 071092 INV 071092 ACCT 520437 250POL - EDMONDS 28Page: Packet Page 55 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 29 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213083 2/26/2015 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC 5 BOXES MEDIUM BINDER CLIPS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 2.70 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 0.26 Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Hand285121 Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Hand 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 25.10 Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Hand 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 25.10 Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Hand 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 25.10 Water/Sewer/Street/Storm - Hand 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 25.10 PW - Office Supplies 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 85.13 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.31.00 2.39 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.31.00 2.39 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.31.00 2.39 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 2.39 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 8.07 PW Office Supplies -Legal Paper381253 PW Office Supplies -Legal Paper 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 16.37 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.65.518.20.31.00 1.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES426286 Office Supplies 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 240.33 9.5% Sales Tax 29Page: Packet Page 56 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 30 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213083 2/26/2015 (Continued)063511 OFFICE MAX INC 001.000.25.514.30.31.00 22.83 INV 510065 ACCT 520437 250 POL510065 DOZEN LETTER SIZE LEGAL PADS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 12.08 RETRACTABLE PENS 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 70.92 24-PACK OF 3X3 POST IT NOTES 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 25.94 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.10.31.00 10.35 P&R FLIPCHARTS551975 P&R FLIPCHARTS 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 38.14 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.571.21.31.00 3.62 Total :648.25 213084 2/26/2015 068746 ONYX VALVE CO.034036 WWTP - REPAIR/MAINTENANCE, MECHANICAL gauges, valves, and sleeves 423.000.76.535.80.48.21 1,296.26 Total :1,296.26 213085 2/26/2015 002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 00074454 Unit 66 - Filter Housing Unit 66 - Filter Housing 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 80.62 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 13.20 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 8.91 Unit 138 - Supplies00074540 Unit 138 - Supplies 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 2,623.73 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 38.56 9.5% Sales Tax 30Page: Packet Page 57 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 31 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213085 2/26/2015 (Continued)002203 OWEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 252.92 Unit 106 - Debris Hose00074541 Unit 106 - Debris Hose 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 1,180.76 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 112.17 Total :4,310.87 213086 2/26/2015 060945 PACIFIC POWER BATTERIES 19001333 Unit 405 - Battery Unit 405 - Battery 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 115.33 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 10.96 Total :126.29 213087 2/26/2015 027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 187491 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 120.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187654 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 84.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187663 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187678 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 84.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187702 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 120.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187717 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187755 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 31Page: Packet Page 58 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 32 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213087 2/26/2015 (Continued)027060 PACIFIC TOPSOILS 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 120.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187763 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187781 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 120.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187826 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187836 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 PM YARD WASTE DUMP CUST # 5130187855 PM YARD WASTE DUMP 001.000.64.576.80.47.00 96.00 Total :1,224.00 213088 2/26/2015 069873 PAPE MACHINERY INC 9311600 Fleet - Hose Fleet - Hose 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 52.15 Freight 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.92 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 6.18 Total :71.25 213089 2/26/2015 065051 PARAMETRIX INC 18-82310 WWTP - PLC & SCADA SYSTEM UPGRADE phase 04-PLC-301, ~ 423.100.76.594.39.41.10 40,493.08 Total :40,493.08 213090 2/26/2015 070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 105920 Unit 448 - Towing Unit 448 - Towing 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 166.00 32Page: Packet Page 59 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 33 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213090 2/26/2015 (Continued)070962 PAULSONS TOWING INC 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.48.00 15.77 Total :181.77 213091 2/26/2015 028860 PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC G093402 Sewer LS 8 - Gas Detector Ports Sewer LS 8 - Gas Detector Ports 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 251.18 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 23.86 Traffic - SuppliesG108484 Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 25.69 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 2.44 PM PLSTC MED LAMPHOLDERG118335 PM PLSTC MED LAMPHOLDER 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 36.52 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 3.47 WWTP - SUPPLIES, ELECTRICG146331 electric supplies 423.000.76.535.80.31.22 1,259.11 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.22 119.62 FAC - Emergency Lights SuppliesG161686 FAC - Emergency Lights Supplies 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 168.75 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 16.03 Total :1,906.67 213092 2/26/2015 064735 PNWS - AWWA 2305 WWUC Dues 2015 WWUC Dues 2015 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 500.00 33Page: Packet Page 60 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 34 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :500.002130922/26/2015 064735 064735 PNWS - AWWA 213093 2/26/2015 071811 PONY MAIL BOX & BUSINESS CTR 214770 WWTP - POSTAGE to: Dept of L&I~ 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 43.19 Total :43.19 213094 2/26/2015 064088 PROTECTION ONE 291104 ALARM MONITORING - PARKS MAINT./FS #16 ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 21.33 ALARM MONITORING FOR PARKS MAINTENANCE 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 21.33 Total :42.66 213095 2/26/2015 070955 R&R STAR TOWING 97490 INV 97490 EDMONDS PD CASE 15-0549 TOW 1999 SILVER VW (VIN -2784) TO 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 166.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.41.521.22.41.00 15.77 Total :181.77 213096 2/26/2015 061540 REPUBLIC SERVICES #197 3-0197-0800478 FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W FIRE STATION #20 23009 88TH AVE W 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 147.28 Total :147.28 213097 2/26/2015 072387 RUSSELL SIGN CO E-21572 City Hall - ADA Sign City Hall - ADA Sign 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 95.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 9.03 Total :104.03 213098 2/26/2015 065001 SCHIRMAN, RON 16 LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 3,646.81 34Page: Packet Page 61 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 35 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount (Continued)Total :3,646.812130982/26/2015 065001 065001 SCHIRMAN, RON 213099 2/26/2015 037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 2002-0254-7 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95TH AVE W / PEDEST CAUTION LIGHT 21930 95TH AVE W / 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 31.80 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W / METER 12003-4823-3 TRAFFIC LIGHT 22000 84TH AVE W / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 92.17 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / METE2003-9895-6 FIRE STATION #16 8429 196TH ST SW / 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,451.08 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE W / METER2006-1131-7 LIFT STATION #9 19300 80TH AVE W / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 275.21 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / METER 100002007-2302-1 TRAFFIC LIGHT 961 PUGET DR / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 51.22 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / METER 100042014-4175-5 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21531 HWY 99 / METER 111.000.68.542.63.47.00 95.25 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 1002015-5174-4 SNO-ISLE LIBRARY 650 MAIN ST / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 1,907.67 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW / METER 12017-5147-6 TRAFFIC LIGHT 9932 220TH ST SW / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 133.80 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / METE2019-4248-9 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 001.000.65.518.20.47.00 94.66 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 111.000.68.542.90.47.00 359.69 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 359.69 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 423.000.75.535.80.47.10 359.69 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 35Page: Packet Page 62 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 36 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213099 2/26/2015 (Continued)037375 SNO CO PUD NO 1 511.000.77.548.68.47.00 359.69 PUBLIC WORKS OMC 7110 210TH ST SW / 422.000.72.531.90.47.00 359.67 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / METER 100042022-8945-0 TRAFFIC LIGHT 21931 HWY 99 / METER 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 200.54 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #17 250 5TH2022-9166-2 CIVIC CENTER & FIRE STATION #17 250 5TH 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 4,726.12 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 100012612024-3924-6 CITY HALL 121 5TH AVE N / METER 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 2,677.94 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW (FS #16)2028-0763-2 TRAFFIC LIGHT 8429 196TH ST SW (FIRE 001.000.66.518.30.47.00 35.53 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / METER 10001353812030-9778-7 WWTP 200 2ND AVE S / METER 1000135381 423.000.76.535.80.47.61 28,917.71 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 8519 BOWDOIN WAY2036-5215-1 FIVE CORNERS RESERVOIR 8519 BOWDOIN WAY 421.000.74.534.80.47.00 648.87 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MAIN ST /2202-1638-6 PEDEST CAUTION LIGHTS 8410 MAIN ST / 111.000.68.542.64.47.00 177.67 Total :43,315.67 213100 2/26/2015 038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 2076629-01 Street - Work Jeans, TShirts & Jacket - Street - Work Jeans, TShirts & Jacket - 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 394.50 9.2% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 36.29 Storm - Work Jeans and T Shirts - M2076636-01 Storm - Work Jeans and T Shirts - M 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 182.65 9.2% Sales Tax 36Page: Packet Page 63 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 37 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213100 2/26/2015 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 16.80 Storm - TShirt - M Brown2078075-01 Storm - TShirt - M Brown 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 30.70 9.2% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 2.82 Storm - T Shirs - M Brown2078719-01 Storm - T Shirs - M Brown 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 64.55 9.2% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 5.94 Storm - Work Jeans, T Shirts - K Harris4247248-01 Storm - Work Jeans, T Shirts - K Harris 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 259.30 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 24.63 Storm - Work Jeans, T Shirts,4247586-01 Storm - Work Jeans, T Shirts, 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 333.45 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 31.68 Street - 5 Work Jeans C Hiatt4247697-01 Street - 5 Work Jeans C Hiatt 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 310.50 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 29.50 Storm - 5 Work Jeans, and T Shirts - ~4247706-01 Storm - 5 Work Jeans, and T Shirts - ~ 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 331.75 9.5% Sales Tax 422.000.72.531.90.24.00 31.52 Sewer - 5 Work Jeans - S Long4247708-01 Sewer - 5 Work Jeans - S Long 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 200.95 37Page: Packet Page 64 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 38 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213100 2/26/2015 (Continued)038410 SOUND SAFETY PRODUCTS 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 19.09 Street - Work Jeans, T Shirts - D4247764-01 Street - Work Jeans, T Shirts - D 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 338.55 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 32.16 Street - Work Sweatshirt, Jeans,4247769-01 Street - Work Sweatshirt, Jeans, 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 334.40 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.90.24.00 31.77 Water - 5 Work Jeans - R Shore4247819-01 Water - 5 Work Jeans - R Shore 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 203.50 9.5% Sales Tax 421.000.74.534.80.24.00 19.33 Sewer - Work Jeans 5 - T Harris4247889-01 Sewer - Work Jeans 5 - T Harris 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 149.40 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.24.00 14.19 WWTP - 2015 UNIFORM, JIM NORDQUIST4248365-01 2015 uniform, Jim Nordquist 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 175.56 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 16.68 WWTP - 2015 UNIFORM, JIM NORDQUIST4248367-01 2015 uniform, Jim Nordquist 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 43.25 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 4.11 Total :3,669.52 213101 2/26/2015 065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC 17162 LS 1 - Modifications 38Page: Packet Page 65 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 39 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213101 2/26/2015 (Continued)065578 SYSTEMS INTERFACE INC LS 1 - Modifications 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 1,986.16 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.48.00 188.69 Total :2,174.85 213102 2/26/2015 040917 TACOMA SCREW PRODUCTS INC 11434203 Traffic - Supplies Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 410.34 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 38.98 PM YOST POOL SCREW, NUT, WASHER, BIT HOL18067059 PM YOST POOL SCREW, NUT, WASHER, BIT 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 129.08 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.31.00 12.26 Total :590.66 213103 2/26/2015 062319 TAUNTON DIRECT INC 000112628393 FINE GARDENING MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION ACC FINE GARDENING MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION 001.000.64.576.80.49.00 69.95 Total :69.95 213104 2/26/2015 073255 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES, INC PSV1302784 Fac Maint - Filters Fac Maint - Filters 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 92.88 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 8.82 Fac Maint - FiltersPSV1305321 Fac Maint - Filters 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 135.96 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 12.92 Fac Maint - FiltersPSV1305388 Fac Maint - Filters 39Page: Packet Page 66 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 40 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213104 2/26/2015 (Continued)073255 TOTAL FILTRATION SERVICES, INC 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 280.44 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 26.64 Total :557.66 213105 2/26/2015 068724 US HEALTHWORKS MED GROUP OF WA 0588470-WA - 2 Sewer - 1 DOT Sewer - 1 DOT 423.000.75.535.80.49.00 99.00 INV 0590367-WA ACCT 001447 EDMONDS PD -0590367-WA LEAD WITH ZPP-BLOOD - JUSTIN LEE 001.000.41.521.40.41.00 60.00 Total :159.00 213106 2/26/2015 064423 USA BLUE BOOK 534691 Sewer - Lifting Slings Supplies Sewer - Lifting Slings Supplies 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 264.80 Freight 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 23.82 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.75.535.80.31.00 27.42 Total :316.04 213107 2/26/2015 065269 VALLEY FREIGHTLINER INC 2250050034 Unit PS17 - Anti Freeze Unit PS17 - Anti Freeze 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 127.80 9.5% Sales Tax 511.000.77.548.68.31.10 12.14 Total :139.94 213108 2/26/2015 067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 9740495841 C/A 671247844-00001 Cell Service-Bldg 001.000.62.524.20.42.00 48.76 Cell Service-Eng 001.000.67.532.20.42.00 171.17 Cell Service Fac-Maint 40Page: Packet Page 67 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 41 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213108 2/26/2015 (Continued)067865 VERIZON WIRELESS 001.000.66.518.30.42.00 112.74 Cell Service-Parks Discovery Program 001.000.64.571.23.42.00 24.38 Cell Service Parks Maint 001.000.64.576.80.42.00 57.93 Cell Service-PD 001.000.41.521.22.42.00 365.02 Cell Service-PD 104 Fund 104.000.41.521.21.42.00 188.89 Cell Service-PW Street 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 48.84 Cell Service-PW Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 29.24 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 111.000.68.542.90.42.00 46.11 Cell Service-PW Street/Storm 422.000.72.531.90.42.00 46.10 Cell Service-PW Water 421.000.74.534.80.42.00 86.96 Cell Service-PW Sewer 423.000.75.535.80.42.00 119.56 Cell Service-WWTP 423.000.76.535.80.42.00 51.65 Total :1,397.35 213109 2/26/2015 069816 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 8040365030 WWTP - SUPPLIES, LAB crucible, L.F. Coors 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 268.96 Freight 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 6.89 9.5% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.31.31 26.20 Total :302.05 213110 2/26/2015 068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE 20114738 INV 20114738 ACCT 23104-001 DT LEVEL 2 - 41Page: Packet Page 68 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 42 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213110 2/26/2015 (Continued)068259 WA ST CRIMINAL JUSTICE DT LEVEL 2 CLASS - JUSTIN LEE~ 001.000.41.521.40.49.00 250.00 Total :250.00 213111 2/26/2015 061485 WA ST DEPT OF HEALTH 22500 U 2015 Operating Permit System Cert 2015 Operating Permit System Cert 421.000.74.534.80.49.00 11,265.15 Total :11,265.15 213112 2/26/2015 045517 WACA 2015 WACA DUES 2015 WACA DUES - DAWSON, SHOEMAKE - EDMO 2015 DUES - DAWSON 001.000.41.521.70.49.00 35.00 2015 DUES - SHOEMAKE 001.000.41.521.70.49.00 35.00 Total :70.00 213113 2/26/2015 075154 WALTER E NELSON CO 475552 Fac Maint - Hand Soap, Towels, TT, Fac Maint - Hand Soap, Towels, TT, 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 309.84 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.66.518.30.31.00 29.43 Total :339.27 213114 2/26/2015 067195 WASHINGTON TREE EXPERTS I15-075 PM TREE SERVICE 5TH & WALNUT PM TREE SERVICE 5TH & WALNUT 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 580.00 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.80.48.00 55.10 Total :635.10 213115 2/26/2015 064800 WEHOP 2201 FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS CREDIT FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS CREDIT 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 -80.91 9.5% Sales Tax 001.000.64.576.81.31.00 -7.69 42Page: Packet Page 69 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 43 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213115 2/26/2015 (Continued)064800 WEHOP PM FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS470846 PM FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 2,214.81 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 210.41 PM FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS470847 PM FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 2,502.93 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 237.78 PM FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS470936 PM FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 235.33 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 22.36 PM FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS470937 PM FLOWER PROGRAM PLANTS 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 636.16 9.5% Sales Tax 125.000.64.576.80.31.00 60.44 Total :6,031.62 213116 2/26/2015 075161 WHISTLE WORKWEAR 76536 WWTP - 2015 UNIFORM, DAN GARCIA 2015 uniform, Dan Garcia 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 236.75 8.7% Sales Tax 423.000.76.535.80.24.00 20.60 Total :257.35 213117 2/26/2015 065179 WSAPT 1 WSAPT SPRING CONFERENCE- KRISTIN JOHNS WSAPT SPRING CONFERENCE- KRISTIN JOHNS 001.000.62.524.20.49.00 175.00 Total :175.00 213118 2/26/2015 051050 WYATT, ARTHUR D 12 LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement 43Page: Packet Page 70 of 344 02/26/2015 Voucher List City of Edmonds 44 7:56:35AM Page:vchlist Bank code :usbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #Description/Account Amount 213118 2/26/2015 (Continued)051050 WYATT, ARTHUR D LEOFF 1 Medical Reimbursement 009.000.39.517.20.23.00 1,519.50 Total :1,519.50 213119 2/26/2015 070432 ZACHOR & THOMAS PS INC 1042 FEB-15 RETAINER Monthly Retainer 001.000.36.515.33.41.00 13,930.96 Total :13,930.96 213120 2/26/2015 071604 ZOHO CORPORATION 2096420 HELP DESK & DESKTOP MANAGEMENT MAINTENAN Annual Subscription fee for 001.000.31.518.88.48.00 5,391.00 Total :5,391.00 213121 2/26/2015 051282 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 0174242 Traffic - Supplies Traffic - Supplies 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 325.00 Freight 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 15.69 9.5% Sales Tax 111.000.68.542.64.31.00 32.37 Total :373.06 Bank total :560,279.01117 Vouchers for bank code :usbank 560,279.01Total vouchers :Vouchers in this report117 44Page: Packet Page 71 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC STM 190th Pl SW Wall Construction c428 E3FF STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA SWR 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE STM 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c406 E3FA STM 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects c407 E3FB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA STR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC WTR 2014 Waterline Replacement Program c422 E4JA STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC SWR 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA WTR 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA STR 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk c421 E3DA STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 72 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB STR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)c390 E2GB WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB STR Citywide Safety Improvements c404 E2AC SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c409 E3FD STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA FAC Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades c393 E3LA STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 73 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM NPDES m013 E7FG SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB WTR OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)c141 E3JB STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA STR School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant c420 E3AA PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation c307 E9FB Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 74 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA ENG Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 75 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STR E0AA c329 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade STM E0FC c326 Stormwater GIS Support WTR E0IA c324 AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements WTR E0JA c363 2010 Waterline Replacement Program FAC E0LA c327 Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project FAC E0LB c332 Senior Center Roof Repairs STR E1AA c342 Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR E1AB c343 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming STR E1CA c368 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements STR E1DA c354 Sunset Walkway Improvements General E1EA c372 SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM E1FD c339 Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades STM E1FF c341 Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects STM E1FH c349 Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) STM E1FM c374 Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives STM E1FN c376 Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement SWR E1GA c347 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement WTR E1GB c370 Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update WTR E1JA c333 2011 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JB c344 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood WTR E1JC c345 Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study WTR E1JD c346 PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment WTR E1JE c340 2012 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E1JK c375 Main Street Watermain STR E2AA c391 Transportation Plan Update STR E2AB c392 9th Avenue Improvement Project STR E2AC c404 Citywide Safety Improvements STR E2AD c405 Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) WTR E2CA c388 2012 Waterline Overlay Program WTR E2CB c389 Pioneer Way Road Repair STR E2CC c399 5th Ave Overlay Project PM E2DB c146 Interurban Trail STM E2FA c378 North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM E2FB c379 SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM E2FC c380 Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STM E2FD c381 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 76 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STM E2FE c382 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements SWR E2GA c369 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update SWR E2GB c390 Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP) STR E3AA c420 School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant STR E3AB c427 SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STR E3DA c421 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk STR E3DB c423 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR E3DC c424 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR E3DD c425 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR E3DE c426 ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STM E3FA c406 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement STM E3FB c407 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects STM E3FC c408 Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM E3FD c409 Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM E3FE c410 Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive STM E3FF c428 190th Pl SW Wall Construction STM E3FG c429 Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM E3FH c430 SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements SWR E3GA c398 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E3GB c142 OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements WTR E3JA c397 2013 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E3JB c418 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) WTR E3JB c141 OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) FAC E3LA c393 Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades FAC E3LB c419 ESCO III Project STR E4CA c438 2014 Overlay Program STR E4CB c451 2014 Chip Seals STR E4CC c452 2014 Waterline Overlays STR E4CD c462 220th Street Overlay Project ENG E4DA c453 Train Trench - Concept STR E4DB c454 SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing STM E4FA c433 2014 Drainage Improvements STM E4FB c434 LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM E4FC c435 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM E4FD c436 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STM E4FE c455 Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 77 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Engineering Number) Funding Engineering Project Number Project Accounting Number Project Title STM E4FF c459 Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines SWR E4GA c441 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project SWR E4GB c456 Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I SWR E4GC c461 Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study WWTP E4HA c446 Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring WTR E4JA c422 2014 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JB c440 2015 Waterline Replacement Program WTR E4JC c460 2016 Water Comp Plan Update FAC E4LA c444 Public Safety Controls System Upgrades PRK E4MA c417 City Spray Park FAC E4MB c443 Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab STR E5AA c470 Trackside Warning System STR E5AB c471 2015 Traffic Calming STR E5CA c463 2015 Overlay Program STM E5FA c466 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM E5FB c467 Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects SWR E5GA c469 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects WTR E5JA c468 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects STR E6DA c245 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project STR E6DB c256 Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project General E6MA c238 SR99 Enhancement Program STR E7AA c265 Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements STR E7AC i005 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STR E7CB c268 Shell Valley Emergency Access Road STM E7FG m013 NPDES PM E7MA c276 Dayton Street Plaza SWR E8GA c298 Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) SWR E8GD c301 City-Wide Sewer Improvements PM E8MA c282 Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PM E8MB c290 Marina Beach Additional Parking STR E9CA c294 2009 Street Overlay Program STR E9DA c312 226th Street Walkway Project STM E9FB c307 Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation SWR E9GA c304 Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design PM E9MA c321 Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 78 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title WTR c141 E3JB OVD Watermain Improvements (2003) SWR c142 E3GB OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements PM c146 E2DB Interurban Trail General c238 E6MA SR99 Enhancement Program STR c245 E6DA 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project STR c256 E6DB Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project STR c265 E7AA Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements STR c268 E7CB Shell Valley Emergency Access Road PM c276 E7MA Dayton Street Plaza PM c282 E8MA Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor PM c290 E8MB Marina Beach Additional Parking STR c294 E9CA 2009 Street Overlay Program SWR c298 E8GA Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08) SWR c301 E8GD City-Wide Sewer Improvements SWR c304 E9GA Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design STM c307 E9FB Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation STR c312 E9DA 226th Street Walkway Project PM c321 E9MA Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements WTR c324 E0IA AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements STM c326 E0FC Stormwater GIS Support FAC c327 E0LA Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project STR c329 E0AA 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade FAC c332 E0LB Senior Center Roof Repairs WTR c333 E1JA 2011 Waterline Replacement Program STM c339 E1FD Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades WTR c340 E1JE 2012 Waterline Replacement Program STM c341 E1FF Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects STR c342 E1AA Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W) STR c343 E1AB 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming WTR c344 E1JB 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood WTR c345 E1JC Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study WTR c346 E1JD PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment SWR c347 E1GA 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement STM c349 E1FH Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity) Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 79 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title STR c354 E1DA Sunset Walkway Improvements WTR c363 E0JA 2010 Waterline Replacement Program STR c368 E1CA 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements SWR c369 E2GA 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update WTR c370 E1GB Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update General c372 E1EA SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing STM c374 E1FM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives WTR c375 E1JK Main Street Watermain STM c376 E1FN Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement STM c378 E2FA North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements STM c379 E2FB SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System STM c380 E2FC Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study STM c381 E2FD Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 STM c382 E2FE 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements WTR c388 E2CA 2012 Waterline Overlay Program WTR c389 E2CB Pioneer Way Road Repair SWR c390 E2GB Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP) STR c391 E2AA Transportation Plan Update STR c392 E2AB 9th Avenue Improvement Project FAC c393 E3LA Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades WTR c397 E3JA 2013 Waterline Replacement Program SWR c398 E3GA 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project STR c399 E2CC 5th Ave Overlay Project STR c404 E2AC Citywide Safety Improvements STR c405 E2AD Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III) STM c406 E3FA 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement STM c407 E3FB 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects STM c408 E3FC Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study STM c409 E3FD Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave) STM c410 E3FE Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive PRK c417 E4MA City Spray Park WTR c418 E3JB 224th Waterline Relocation (2013) FAC c419 E3LB ESCO III Project STR c420 E3AA School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 80 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title STR c421 E3DA 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk WTR c422 E4JA 2014 Waterline Replacement Program STR c423 E3DB 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave) STR c424 E3DC 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave) STR c425 E3DD 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School) STR c426 E3DE ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S STR c427 E3AB SR104 Corridor Transportation Study STM c428 E3FF 190th Pl SW Wall Construction STM c429 E3FG Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th STM c430 E3FH SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements STM c433 E4FA 2014 Drainage Improvements STM c434 E4FB LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin STM c435 E4FC 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration STM c436 E4FD 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects STR c438 E4CA 2014 Overlay Program WTR c440 E4JB 2015 Waterline Replacement Program SWR c441 E4GA 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project FAC c443 E4MB Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab FAC c444 E4LA Public Safety Controls System Upgrades WWTP c446 E4HA Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring STR c451 E4CB 2014 Chip Seals STR c452 E4CC 2014 Waterline Overlays ENG c453 E4DA Train Trench - Concept STR c454 E4DB SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing STM c455 E4FE Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station SWR c456 E4GB Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I STM c459 E4FF Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines WTR c460 E4JC 2016 Water Comp Plan Update SWR c461 E4GC Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study STR c462 E4CD 220th Street Overlay Project STR c463 E5CA 2015 Overlay Program STM c466 E5FA 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects STM c467 E5FB Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects WTR c468 E5JA 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 81 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By New Project Accounting Number) Funding Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number Project Title SWR c469 E5GA 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects STR c470 E5AA Trackside Warning System STR c471 E5AB 2015 Traffic Calming STR i005 E7AC 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements STM m013 E7FG NPDES Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 82 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number ENG Train Trench - Concept c453 E4DA FAC Edmonds Museum Exterior Repairs Project c327 E0LA FAC Senior Center Roof Repairs c332 E0LB FAC Frances Anderson Center Accessibility Upgrades c393 E3LA FAC ESCO III Project c419 E3LB FAC Public Safety Controls System Upgrades c444 E4LA FAC Edmonds Fishing Pier Rehab c443 E4MB General SR104 Telecommunications Conduit Crossing c372 E1EA General SR99 Enhancement Program c238 E6MA PM Interurban Trail c146 E2DB PM Dayton Street Plaza c276 E7MA PM Fourth Avenue Cultural Corridor c282 E8MA PM Marina Beach Additional Parking c290 E8MB PM Senior Center Parking Lot & Landscaping Improvements c321 E9MA PRK City Spray Park c417 E4MA STM Stormwater GIS Support c326 E0FC STM Public Facilities Water Quality Upgrades c339 E1FD STM Storm Contribution to Transportation Projects c341 E1FF STM Stormwater Development Review Support (NPDES Capacity)c349 E1FH STM Dayton Street & SR104 Storm Drainage Alternatives c374 E1FM STM Perrinville Creek Culvert Replacement c376 E1FN STM Edmonds Marsh Feasibility Study c380 E2FC STM 2012 Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements c382 E2FE STM 2013 Citywide Drainage Replacement c406 E3FA STM 2013 Lake Ballinger Basin Study & Associated Projects c407 E3FB STM Perrinville Creek Stormwater Flow Reduction Retrofit Study c408 E3FC STM Dayton Street Storm Improvements (6th Ave - 8th Ave)c409 E3FD STM Northstream Pipe Abandonment on Puget Drive c410 E3FE STM 190th Pl SW Wall Construction c428 E3FF STM Storm Drainage Improvements - 88th & 194th c429 E3FG STM SW Edmonds-105th/106th Ave W Storm Improvements c430 E3FH STM 2014 Drainage Improvements c433 E4FA STM LID Retrofits Perrinville Creek Basin c434 E4FB STM 2014 Willow Creek Daylighting/Edmonds Marsh Restoration c435 E4FC STM 2014 Lake Ballinger Associated Projects c436 E4FD Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 83 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STM Dayton Street Stormwater Pump Station c455 E4FE STM Video Assessment of Stormwater Lines c459 E4FF STM Update Stormwater Management Code & Associated Projects c467 E5FB STM NPDES m013 E7FG STM Talbot Rd. Storm Drain Project/Perrinville Creek Mitigation c307 E9FB STM North Talbot Road Drainage Improvements c378 E2FA STM SW Edmonds Basin #3-238th St. SW to Hickman Park Infiltration System c379 E2FB STM Lake Ballinger Associated Projects 2012 c381 E2FD STM 2015 Citywide Drainage Improvements/Rehab Projects c466 E5FA STR 100th Ave W/Firdale Ave/238th St. SW/Traffic Signal Upgrade c329 E0AA STR Five Corners Roundabout (212th Street SW @ 84th Avenue W)c342 E1AA STR 2011 Residential Neighborhood Traffic Calming c343 E1AB STR 76th Ave W at 212th St SW Intersection Improvements c368 E1CA STR Sunset Walkway Improvements c354 E1DA STR Transportation Plan Update c391 E2AA STR 9th Avenue Improvement Project c392 E2AB STR Citywide Safety Improvements c404 E2AC STR Hwy 99 Enhancements (Phase III)c405 E2AD STR 5th Ave Overlay Project c399 E2CC STR School Zone Flashing Beacon/Lighting Grant c420 E3AA STR SR104 Corridor Transportation Study c427 E3AB STR 220 7th Ave N Sidewalk c421 E3DA STR 238th St. SW Walkway (100th Ave to 104th Ave)c423 E3DB STR 15th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to 8th Ave)c424 E3DC STR 236th St. SW Walkway (Edmonds Way to Madrona School)c425 E3DD STR ADA Curb Ramp Upgrades along 3rd Ave S c426 E3DE STR 2014 Overlay Program c438 E4CA STR 2014 Chip Seals c451 E4CB STR 2014 Waterline Overlays c452 E4CC STR 220th Street Overlay Project c462 E4CD STR SR104/City Park Mid-Block Crossing c454 E4DB STR Trackside Warning System c470 E5AA STR 2015 Traffic Calming c471 E5AB STR 2015 Overlay Program c463 E5CA STR 76th Avenue West/75th Place West Walkway Project c245 E6DA Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 84 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number STR Caspers/Ninth Avenue/Puget Drive (SR524) Walkway Project c256 E6DB STR Main Street Lighting and Sidewalk Enhancements c265 E7AA STR 228th St. SW Corridor Improvements i005 E7AC STR Shell Valley Emergency Access Road c268 E7CB STR 2009 Street Overlay Program c294 E9CA STR 226th Street Walkway Project c312 E9DA SWR 2012 Sewermain-Alder/Dellwood/Beach Pl/224th St. Sewer Replacement c347 E1GA SWR 2012 Sanitary Sewer Comp Plan Update c369 E2GA SWR Alder Sanitary Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation (2013 Sewer Pipe Rehab CIPP)c390 E2GB SWR 2013 Sewerline Replacement Project c398 E3GA SWR OVD Sewer Lateral Improvements c142 E3GB SWR 2015 Sewerline Replacement Project c441 E4GA SWR Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehab Phase I c456 E4GB SWR Lift Station #1 Basin & Flow Study c461 E4GC SWR 2016-17 Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects c469 E5GA SWR Lift Station 2 Improvements (Separated from L/s 13 - 09/01/08)c298 E8GA SWR City-Wide Sewer Improvements c301 E8GD SWR Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Design c304 E9GA WTR AWD Intertie and Reservoir Improvements c324 E0IA WTR 2010 Waterline Replacement Program c363 E0JA WTR Sewer, Water, Stormwater Revenue Requirements Update c370 E1GB WTR 2011 Waterline Replacement Program c333 E1JA WTR 76th Ave W Waterline Extension with Lynnwood c344 E1JB WTR Edmonds General Facilities Charge Study c345 E1JC WTR PRV Station 11 and 12 Abandonment c346 E1JD WTR 2012 Waterline Replacement Program c340 E1JE WTR Main Street Watermain c375 E1JK WTR 2012 Waterline Overlay Program c388 E2CA WTR Pioneer Way Road Repair c389 E2CB WTR 2013 Waterline Replacement Program c397 E3JA WTR 224th Waterline Relocation (2013)c418 E3JB WTR OVD Watermain Improvements (2003)c141 E3JB WTR 2014 Waterline Replacement Program c422 E4JA WTR 2015 Waterline Replacement Program c440 E4JB WTR 2016 Water Comp Plan Update c460 E4JC WTR 2016-17 Waterline Replacement Projects c468 E5JA Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 85 of 344 PROJECT NUMBERS (By Project Title) Funding Project Title Project Accounting Number Engineering Project Number WWTP Sewer Outfall Groundwater Monitoring c446 E4HA Revised 2/25/2015 Packet Page 86 of 344    AM-7520     3. C.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:Consent   Submitted For:Bertrand Hauss Submitted By:Megan Luttrell Department:Engineering Type: Action  Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with Perteet for the 228th St. SW Corridor project Recommendation Authorize Mayor to sign the Supplemental Agreement. Previous Council Action On October 16, 2012, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement #1 with Perteet for the 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement project. On June 11, 2013, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplement Agreement #2 with Perteet for the 228 th St. SW Corridor Improvement project. On April 15, 2014, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplement Agreement #3 with Perteet for the 228 th St. SW Corridor Improvement project.   On September 9, 2014, City Council authorized the Mayor to sign Supplement Agreement #4 with Perteet for the 228th St. SW Corridor Improvement project. On February 24, 2015, City Council forwarded this item to the consent agenda at the March 3, 2015 for approval. Narrative The design and right-of-way phases for the 228 th St. SW Corridor Improvements project were recently completed and the construction phase is scheduled to start this April. The proposed supplemental agreement provides the following engineering support services (for work completed in Edmonds / Mountlake Terrace as part of this project):  Attendance at Contractor pre-construction / coordination meetings; Attendance at construction site meetings; Request for Information: address any contractor specific questions about the design documents that City Staff is unable to answer; Constructability issues / plan clarifications; Approval of shop drawings / submittals; Prepare As-Built Record Drawings; and Packet Page 87 of 344 Structural Construction Support. The total fee for the supplemental agreement is $63,930 and will be paid by project funds. Construction is scheduled to begin in April. Attachments Perteet Supplemental Agreement Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering (Originator)Robert English 02/25/2015 04:11 PM Public Works Kody McConnell 02/26/2015 08:02 AM City Clerk Scott Passey 02/26/2015 08:04 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/26/2015 08:19 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/26/2015 09:12 AM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 02/25/2015 08:23 AM Final Approval Date: 02/26/2015  Packet Page 88 of 344 DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 Washington State Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Number 6 Organization and Address Perteet, Inc. 2707 Colby Avenue, Suite 900 Everett, WA 98201 Phone: (425) 252-7700 Original Agreement Number Project Number Execution Date August 11, 2011 Completion Date June 30, 2016 Project Title City of Edmonds 228th Street S.W. Corridor New Maximum Amount Payable $ 705,199 Description of Work See attached Exhibit A – Scope of Services The Local Agency of City of Edmonds desires to supplement the agreement entered into with Perteet, Inc. and executed on August 11, 2011 and identified as Agreement No. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: I Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: See Exhibit “A-1” for scope of services II Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: June 30, 2016 III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: Additional services as described in Exhibit “A-1” will cause an increase in the amount of Sixty-Three Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Dollars ($63,930) as shown in Exhibit “E-1” for a new contract Maximum amount payable of Seven Hundred Five Thousand One Hundred Ninety-Nine Dollars ($705,199). If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: Perteet, Inc. By: Crystal L. Donner, President Approving Authority Signature Date Packet Page 89 of 344 DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 Exhibit “A-1” Scope of Services City of Edmonds 228th Street S.W. Corridor Improvement Project Task 32 – Construction Support Services The CONSTULANT shall provide professional services to support the CITY during the construction of the project. It is assumed that construction will occur during a 12-month period beginning in April 2015. The 12-month construction period may be extended by weather days or winter suspension. This work shall include the following design construction support services: 32.1 Preconstruction Meeting, Public and Coordination Meetings As requested by the CITY, the CONSULTANT will attend the pre-construction, public, and contractor coordination meetings during the construction period. For budgetary purposes, it is assumed the CONSULTANT will attend the pre-construction meeting, a public meeting prior to start of construction, and three contractor coordination meetings in person. A separate supplement will be prepared if additional meetings are required during construction. 32.2 Site Meetings As requested by the CITY, the CONSTULANT shall attend site visits and record observations made. Ten (10) site visits are assumed. A separate supplement will be prepared if additional meetings are required during construction. 32.3 Requests for Information (RFIs) The CONSULTANT shall provide responses in a timely matter. Generally, the CITY will need RFI responses within 3 business days of the request, however more or less time may be allocated for this task depending on the issue. 32.4 Constructibility Issues/Plan Clarifications The CONSULTANT will be required to provide input and guidance on the constructibility issues. This include on-site visits, design revisions based on field conditions, or suggested plan changes by CITY staff. The CONSULTANT shall provide written review and input in a timely matter so that the CITY Contractor’s work flow is not unnecessarily disrupted. This may necessitate the CONSULTANT providing direction at the time of the field visit. 32.5 Approval of Shop Drawings/Submittals The CONSULTANT shall evaluate shop drawings and proposals for substitutions of materials and procedures as submitted by the Contractor for general conformance with the project requirements and intent. The CONSULTANT shall provide review and approval of shop drawings and other submittals within 5 business days. Shop drawings for work related to the following will be reviewed by the CONSULTANT: • Stormwater vaults Packet Page 90 of 344 DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 • Stormwater media filter catch basins and vaults • Walls • Signals • Metal railings • Metal median artwork • Radar feedback signs • Illumination system (designed by Perteet) 32.6 Prepare As-Built Record Drawings It is assumed the CITY will provide complete, consolidated set of redlines for the CONSULTANT to use in the as-built drawing preparation. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a draft 11”x17” as-built record drawing for the CLIENT’s review prior to finalizing. As-built mylars will not be prepared. Assumptions: • Another firm is performing construction administration support in accordance with City and FHWA requirements. • MEF documentation will not be prepared. • A separate supplement will be prepared if additional services are needed to review shop drawings or submittals not directly related to the work mentioned in Task 32.5. • Geotechnical support or review. • A separate supplement will be prepared if additional design support or review services are required during construction. • Upon City approval the CONSULTANT can shift funds within the Contract between tasks, and between members of the CONSULTANT team during the prosecution of the work. Deliverables: • Invoices with Progress Reports (12 total) • RFI Responses • Signed and Stamped Approval of Shop Drawings • As-Built Drawings – 11”x17” and 22”x34” paper, Electronic PDF and Electronic CAD files – 1 copy each of Draft and Final Task 33 – Construction Support Services – Mountlake Terrace Time billed to this Task will be for Construction Support Services related to work in the Mountlake Terrace portion of the project. This work shall include the following design construction support services: 33.1 Site Meetings – Mountlake Terrace As requested by the CITY, the CONSTULANT shall attend site visits and record observations made. Two (2) site visits are assumed. A separate supplement will be prepared if additional meetings are required during construction. Packet Page 91 of 344 DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 33.2 Requests for Information (RFIs) – Mountlake Terrace Same as Task 32.3. 33.3 Constructibility Issues/Plan Clarifications – Mountlake Terrace Same as Task 32.4. Assumptions: • Same as Task 32. Deliverables: • Invoices with Progress Reports (12 total) • RFI Responses Packet Page 92 of 344 DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 Packet Page 93 of 344 DOT Form 140-063 EF Revised 9/2005 Exhibit “E-1” Consultant Fee Determination Summary 2707 Colby Avenue, Suite 900, Everett, WA 98201 | P 425.252.7700 | F 425.339.6018 Project: 228th Street SW Corridor Improve Project - Supplement#6 Client: City of Edmonds Hourly Costs Plus Fixed Fee Estimate Classification Hours Rate Amount Sr. Associate 44.00 67.50 $2,970 Lead Engineer / Mgr 211.00 38.46 $8,115 Lead Engineer / Mgr 24.00 50.00 $1,200 Lead Technician/Designer 100.00 37.00 $3,700 Lead Technician/Designer 12.00 37.50 $450 Total Direct Salary Costs 391.00 $16,435 Overhead @ 162.58% $26,720 Fixed Fee @ 30.00% $4,931 Total Labor Costs $48,086 Reimbursables In-House Costs Qty Rate Amount Mileage - $.575 646 $0.575 $371.00 Total In-House Costs $371.00 Subconsultants Subconsultants Cost Markup Amount CG Engineering, PLLC $9,972.00 1.05 $10,471.00 Total Subconsultants $9,972.00 $10,471.00 Other Management Reserve $5,002.00 Total Other Costs $5,002.00 CONTRACT TOTAL $63,930.00 Rates shown reflect the typical compensation rate of employees assigned to the billing category listed. Each category may have multiple employees assigned to that billing category and each employee may have a different hourly rate of pay. Employee compensation is subject to adjustment in June of each calendar year. Prepared By: Darrell C. Smith Date: February 20, 2015 Packet Page 94 of 344 PM 16 2 . 5 8 % Co n t r a c t T o t a l Ci t y o f M o u n t l a k e T e r r a c e T o t a l Ci t y o f E d m o n d s T o t a l 63 , 9 3 0 . 0 0 $ Markup 499 499 16 2 . 5 8 % Su m m a r y - C i t y o f M o u n t l a k e T e r r a c e 2,327.00 3,783.00 698.00 6,808.00 6,808.00 57 , 1 2 2 . 0 0 Ex p e n s e s 37 0 . 0 0 Su b c o n s u l t a n t s 10 , 4 7 1 . 0 0 14 , 1 0 9 . 0 0 Ov e r h e a d C o s t 22 , 9 3 8 . 0 0 Su b c o n s u l t a n t s Ma n a g e m e n t R e s e r v e Fe e 3 0 % La b o r Ex p e n s e s Fe e 3 0 % 4, 2 3 2 . 0 0 La b o r 41 , 2 7 9 . 0 0 10,471 To t a l s : 37 0 Di r e c t S a l a r y C o s t Ma n a g e m e n t R e s e r v e 5, 0 0 2 . 0 0 Di r e c t S a l a r y C o s t Ov e r h e a d C o s t Su m m a r y - C i t y o f E d m o n d s Ex p e n s e s : Su b c o n s u l t a n t F e e s : C o s t B i l l Mi l e a g e - $ . 5 7 5 37 0 C G E n g i n e e r i n g , P L L C 9 , 9 7 2 10,471 To t a l s : 9, 9 7 2 21 1 . 0 0 3 9 1 . 0 0 T o t a l D o l l a r s $3 , 7 0 0 . 0 0 $ 4 5 0 . 0 0 $ 2 , 9 7 0 . 0 0 $ 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $ 8 , 1 1 6 . 0 0 $16,436.00 T o t a l H o u r s 10 0 . 0 0 12 . 0 0 4 4 . 0 0 2 4 . 0 0 8. 0 0 2 2 . 0 0 1 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 To t a l T a s k 3 3 12 . 0 0 6. 0 0 8 . 0 0 2 8 . 0 0 5 4 . 0 0 2 , 3 2 7 . 0 0 Ta s k 3 3 . 3 - C o n s t r u c t i b i l i t y I s s u e s / P l a n C l a r i f i c a t i o n s - M L T 6. 0 0 4. 0 0 4 . 0 0 8. 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 8 6 5 . 0 0 Ta s k 3 3 . 2 - R F I s - M o u n t l a k e T e r r a c e 6. 0 0 2. 0 0 4 . 0 0 12 . 0 0 1 2 . 0 0 4 6 2 . 0 0 Ta s k 3 3 . 1 - S i t e M e e t i n g s – M o u n t l a k e T e r r a c e Ta s k 3 3 - C o n s t r u c t i o n S u p p o r t S e r v i c e s - M o u n t l a k e T e r r a c e 8. 0 0 5 2 . 0 0 2 , 0 5 8 . 0 0 To t a l T a s k 3 2 88 . 0 0 12 . 0 0 3 8 . 0 0 1 6 . 0 0 1 8 3 . 0 0 3 3 7 . 0 0 1 4 , 1 0 9 . 0 0 Ta s k 3 2 . 6 - P r e p a r e A s - B u i l t D r a w i n g s 40 . 0 0 4. 0 0 22 . 0 0 4 0 . 0 0 1 , 7 0 1 . 0 0 Ta s k 3 2 . 5 - A p p r o v a l o f S h o p D r a w i n g s 12 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 40 . 0 0 9 6 . 0 0 4 , 3 2 4 . 0 0 Ta s k 3 2 . 4 - C o n s t r u c t i b i l i t y I s s u e s / P l a n C l a r i f i c a t i o n s 28 . 0 0 20 . 0 0 8 . 0 0 40 . 0 0 7 2 . 0 0 2 , 9 4 8 . 0 0 Ta s k 3 2 . 3 - R F I s 20 . 0 0 4. 0 0 8 . 0 0 48 . 0 0 4 8 . 0 0 1 , 8 4 6 . 0 0 Ta s k 3 2 . 2 - S i t e M e e t i n g s 25 . 0 0 2 9 . 0 0 1 , 2 3 2 . 0 0 Ta s k 3 2 . 1 - P r e c o n s t r u c t i o n M e e t i n g a n d C o o r d i n a t i o n M e e t i n g s 4. 0 0 La b o r D o l l a r s Ta s k B i l l i n g R a t e $3 7 . 0 0 $ 3 7 . 5 0 $ 6 7 . 5 0 $ 5 0 . 0 0 $ 3 8 . 4 6 To t a l Ho u r s Ta s k 3 2 - C o n s t r u c t i o n S u p p o r t S e r v i c e s Da r r e l l S m i t h Le a d Te c h / D e s i g n e r Le a d Te c h / D e s i g n e r Sr . As s o c i a t e Le a d En g / M g r Le a d En g / M g r Cl i e n t C i t y o f E d m o n d s Pr o j e c t 2 2 8 t h S t r e e t S W C o r r i d o r I m p r o v e P r o j - S u p p l e m e n t # 6 Packet Page 95 of 344    AM-7522     3. D.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:Consent   Submitted For:Jerry Shuster Submitted By:Megan Luttrell Department:Engineering Type: Action  Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign a grant agreement with the State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) for $157,331 for the Preliminary Design and Environmental Permitting of the Willow Creek Daylighting Project Recommendation Authorize Mayor to sign the grant agreement. Previous Council Action On November 20, 2012, the Council authorized the Mayor to sign a $67,113 grant agreement from the RCO for the Early Feasibility Study for the Willow Creek Daylighting project/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Project.    On February 18, 2014, the Council Authorized the Mayor to a sign $200,000 grant agreement from the RCO for the Final Feasibility Study for the Willow Creek Daylighting project/Edmonds Marsh Restoration Project.  On February 24, 2015, staff presented a grant agreement with the State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) for $157,331 for the Preliminary Design and Environmental Permitting of the Willow Creek Daylighting Project; Council forwarded the item to the March 3, 2015 consent agenda for approval. Narrative The City of Edmonds will use this grant to complete the preliminary design and permitting for the project that will improve the connection of Edmonds Marsh to Puget Sound through Willow Creek, which currently flows through a system of buried pipes and vaults built in the 1960s. Restoring an open channel connection from the marsh to Puget Sound will give salmon access to the marsh for rearing.   The City will complete the Final Feasibility for the Willow Creek Daylighting project in the 3nd quarter of 2015. This schedule incorporates the on-going Marina Beach Master Planning project that will include reconfiguring the park to accommodate the future daylighted channel.  The next step in the daylighting project is preliminary design and permitting. This phase will also include continued discussion with BNSF Railway, Unocal/Chevron, Washington State Ferries, and the Port of Edmonds to ensure its successful completion.   In August 2014, the City applied to the RCO for additional funding to complete the Feasibility Study.  In December 2014, RCO awarded the City $157,331 this project.  This grant is from the Puget Sound Packet Page 96 of 344 Acquisition and Restoration Fund (PSAR). The grant is part of more than $18 million given to organizations around the state for projects that restore and protect salmon habitat This grant will add $157,331 to the Stormwater Capital Fund. The grant requires an 18.69% match by the City ($36,160). The matching money plus additional funding for other improvements in the area will be funded from the Stormwater Capital Fund. Attachments Grant Agreement Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering (Originator)Robert English 02/25/2015 02:22 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/25/2015 04:06 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 02/26/2015 08:04 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/26/2015 08:21 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/26/2015 09:12 AM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 02/25/2015 08:48 AM Final Approval Date: 02/26/2015  Packet Page 97 of 344 14-1299P Salmon Project Agreement Salmon Funding Accounts City of Edmonds Project Number:Project Sponsor: 12/4/2014Approval Date:Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary DesignProject Title: PARTIES OF THE AGREEMENTA. This project grant Agreement (Agreement) is entered into between the State of Washington by and through the Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) and the Recreation and Conservation Office, P.O. Box 40917, Olympia, Washington 98504-0917 and City of Edmonds (sponsor), 121 5th Ave N, Edmonds, WA 98020 and shall be binding on the agents and all persons acting by or through the parties. This Agreement sets out the terms and conditions by which a grant is made from the Salmon Funding Accounts of the State of Washington. The grant is administered by the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) to the sponsor for the project named above. B. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT C. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT City of Edmonds will use this funding to prepare preliminary designs for the daylighted channel connection of Edmonds Marsh to Puget Sound by reconfiguring Willow Creek connection under BNSF railroad and across Marina Beach. Permit applications will be completed during this project phase, and the project team will continue negotiations with adjacent landowners regarding project design elements. The overall goal is restoration of Edmonds Marsh, a remnant barrier estuary located in the nearshore within the City of Edmonds (WRIA 8). This future restoration action is being designed to benefit juvenile Chinook salmon. Preliminary Design deliverables will align to the requirements in Manual 18 Appendix D-2. The full scope of the future Edmonds Marsh restoration involves: 1) construction of a ‘daylight’ tidal channel connection from Edmonds Marsh to Puget Sound, 2) improvement of fish passage barrier issues and tributary connectivity upstream of the marsh complex, 3) eradicating invasive species, and 4) addressing potential water quality and flooding issues from urban stormwater runoff. In addition, the project will address access and recreation opportunities, economic and social value of a restored ecosystem in terms of climate change and sea-level rise preparedness, carbon sequestration capacity, and economic value of ecosystem services. This project builds upon previous planning grants (11-1553 and 13-1107) focused on feasibility and conceptual design alternatives for the marsh restoration project. The project reimbursement period shall begin on December 4, 2014 and end on June 30, 2017. No expenditure made before or after this period is eligible for reimbursement unless incorporated by written amendment into this Agreement or specifically provided for by RCFB and/or SRFB policy or WAC. Requests for time extensions are to be made at least 60 days before the Agreement end date. If the request is made after the Agreement end date, the time extension may be denied. The sponsor has obligations beyond this period of performance as described in Section E. D. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE E. ON-GOING OBLIGATION The Project Sponsor's on-going obligation for the project shall be the same as the Period of Performance period identified in Section D. The total grant award provided by the funding board for this project shall not exceed $157,331.00. The funding board shall not pay any amount beyond that approved for grant funding of the project and within the funding board’s percentage as identified below. The sponsor shall be responsible for all total project costs that exceed this amount. The contribution by the sponsor toward work on this project at a minimum shall be as indicated below: F. PROJECT FUNDING Percentage Dollar Amount $157,331.00 81.31%SRFB - Salmon Federal Projects 18.69%Project Sponsor $36,160.00 Total Project Cost $193,491.00 100.00% PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 1 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 98 of 344 All rights and obligations of the parties to this Agreement are subject to this Agreement and its attachments, as now existing or hereafter amended, including the sponsor’s application, eligible scope activities, project milestones, and the Standard Terms and Conditions of the project Agreement, all of which are incorporated herein. Except as provided herein, no amendment/deletions of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement will be effective unless provided in writing. All such amendment/deletions must be signed by both parties except the RCO director may unilaterally make amendments to extend the period of performance. Period of performance extensions need only be signed by RCO’s director or designee. G. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS This agreement is governed by, and the sponsor shall comply with, all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, including Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC, and published agency policies, which are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. H. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES, RULES, AND RCFB-SRFB POLICIES I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS a) Cultural Resources The cultural resources assessment was completed for a portion of the site (the marina beach property) under a prior phase of the project and is attached in PRISM. The future restoration project will be subject to the National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106, but preliminary designs may require additional ground disturbing activities for geotechnical and other investigations. In order to be exempt from Governor’s Executive Order 05-05 Archaeological and Cultural Resources (EO 05-05) as described in Section 9 of this project agreement, sponsor must have an archaeologist monitor any ground disturbing activities necessary for design development, and incorporate observations and results into the Cultural Resources Assessment that will be prepared for the Section 106 consultation. Please note, in order for a future RCO funded restoration project to be exempt from EO 05-05, the Section 106 Area of Potential Effect (APE) must include all ground-disturbing activities (e.g., restoration staging area, riparian planting areas). The sponsor is encouraged to work with the federal permitting agency to align the Section 106 APE with the scope of work subject to a future RCO funded restoration project proposal. If the APE does not include all ground-disturbing activities proposed for RCO funding, RCO will need to initiate cultural resources consultation following EO 05-05 for those activities not included in the federal APE. b) Design and Restoration Project Deliverables: The project will meet the standards for Design and Restoration Project Deliverables described in Manual 18 (2014) Appendix D-2 “Preliminary Design Deliverables”. The following must be submitted to RCO: 1) Preliminary Design Deliverables (See Appendix D-2 for additional details): a) Preliminary Design Report, Drawings, and Engineering Cost Estimate; b) Design Review Comments c) Permit Applications J. FEDERAL FUND INFORMATION A portion or all of the funds for this project are provided through a federal funding source. Funds provided from the US Dept of Commerce must be reported under CFDA #11.438 - PCSRF and Award Number NA14NMF4380297 for federal fiscal year 2014. If the sponsor’s total federal expenditures are $750,000.00 or more during the sponsor’s fiscal-year, the sponsor is required to have a federal single audit conducted for that year in compliance with Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133. A copy of the final audit report must be provided to RCO within nine months of the end of the sponsor’ s fiscal year, unless a longer period is agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency. Failure to provide required A-133 audits will lead to a suspension of payments and may lead to a suspension of RCO Agreements. PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 2 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 99 of 344 PROJECT GRANT AGREEMENT REPRESENTATIVE All written communications and notices under this Agreement will be addressed and sent to at least the mail address or the email address listed below if not both: Project Contact 121 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Address: Title: Jerry ShusterName: Natural Resources Building PO Box 40917 Olympia, Washington 98504-0917 K. SRFB Recreation and Conservation Office Jerry.Shuster@edmondswa.govEmail: These addresses shall be effective until receipt by one party from the other of a written notice of any change. L. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement, with all amendments and attachments, constitutes the entire Agreement of the parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding this Agreement shall exist or bind any of the parties. M.EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement, for project 14-1299P, shall be subject to the written approval of the RCO’s authorized representative and shall not be effective and binding until executed by both the Sponsor and the RCO. Reimbursements for eligible and allowable costs incurred within the period of performance identified in Section D above are allowed only when this Agreement is fully executed and an original is received by RCO. City of Edmonds Assistant Attorney General By: Title: Date: Pre-approved as to form: By: /s/ Name: (printed) State of Washington On behalf of the Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) Date:By: Kaleen Cottingham Director Date: The sponsor/s has read, fully understands, and agrees to be bound by all terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement. The signators listed below represent and warrant their authority to bind the parties to this Agreement. June 7, 2013 PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 3 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 100 of 344 Standard Terms and Conditions of the Project Agreement Table of Contents Page SECTION 1. CITATIONS, HEADINGS AND DEFINITIONS…………………………………………………...6 SECTION 2. PERFORMANCE BY THE SPONSOR…………………………………………………………… SECTION 3. ASSIGNMENT………………………………………………………………………………………. SECTION 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROJECT………………………………………………………………. SECTION 5. INDEMNIFICATION………………………………………………………………………………… SECTION 6. INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF THE SPONSOR…………………………………………….... SECTION 7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST………………………………………………………………………… SECTION 8. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND SIGNS……………………………………………………………… SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW……………………………………………………… SECTION 10. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES……………………………………………………………………. SECTION 11. RECORDS…………………………………………………………………………………………... SECTION 12. TREATMENT OF ASSETS………………………………………………………………………... SECTION 13. RIGHT OF INSPECTION…………………………………………………………………………... SECTION 14. STEWARDSHIP AND MONITORING……………………………………………………………. SECTION 15. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION………………………………………………………………….. SECTION 16. PROJECT FUNDING………………………………………………………………………………. SECTION 17. PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS…………………………………………………………………. SECTION 18. ADVANCE PAYMENTS…………………………………………………………………………… SECTION 19. RECOVERY OF PAYMENTS…………………………………………………………………….. SECTION 20. CONVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES………………………………………………... SECTION 21. PROVISIONS APPLYING TO DEVELOPMENT, RENOVATION AND RESTORATION PROJECTS………………………………………………………………………. SECTION 22. PROVISIONS APPLYING TO ACQUISITION PROJECTS…………………………………… SECTION 23. RESTRICTION ON CONVERSION OF REAL PROPERTY AND/OR FACILITIES TO OTHER USES……………………………………………………….. SECTION 24. CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, USE AND MAINTENANCE OF ASSISTED PROJECTS………………………………………………………………………. SECTION 25. INCOME AND INCOME USE…………………………………………………………………….. SECTION 26. PREFERENCES FOR RESIDENTS…………………………………………………………….. 8 8 10 10 11 7 7 7 7 7 13 13 12 11 11 11 10 10 10 9 9 9 8 12 13 PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 4 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 101 of 344 SECTION 27. PROVISIONS RELATED TO CORPORATE (INCLUDING NONPROFIT) SPONSORS………………………………………………………………………………………… SECTION 28. LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIRMENTS FOR FIREARMS AND ARCHERY RANGE SPONSORS…………………………………………………………. SECTION 29. REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE……………………………………... SECTION 30. FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACCOUNT……………………………………………………. SECTION 31. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE……………………………………………………………………... SECTION 32. AMENDMENTS……………………………………………………………………………………. SECTION 33. LIMITATION OF AUTHORITY…………………………………………………………………… SECTION 34. WAIVER OF DEFAULT…………………………………………………………………………… SECTION 35. APPLICATION REPRESENTATIONS - MISREPRESENTATIONS OR INACCURACY OR BREACH……………………………………………………………….. SECTION 36. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE…………………………………………………………………….. SECTION 37. TERMINATION……………………………………………………………………………………. SECTION 38. DISPUTE HEARING……………………………………………………………………………… SECTION 39. ATTORNEYS’ FEES……………………………………………………………………………... SECTION 40. GOVERNING LAW/VENUE……………………………………………………………………... SECTION 41. SEVERABILITY…………………………………………………………………………………… 16 16 15 15 15 14 14 14 14 14 13 14 15 15 16 PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 5 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 102 of 344 14-1299P Standard Terms and Conditions of the Project Agreement City of Edmonds Project Number:Project Sponsor: 12/4/2014Approval Date:Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary DesignProject Title: SECTION 1. CITATIONS, HEADINGS AND DEFINITIONS A.Any citations referencing specific documents refer to the current version at the date of project Agreement and/or any revisions in the future. B.Headings used in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not be considered a substantive part of this Agreement. C.Definitions. As used throughout this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below: acquisition -The purchase of fee or less than fee interests in real property. These interests include, but are not limited to, conservation easements, access/trail easements, covenants, water rights, leases, and mineral rights. Agreement - The accord accepted by all parties to the present transaction; this Agreement, any supplemental Agreements, any amendments to this Agreement and any intergovernmental Agreements. applicant - Any agency or organization that meets the qualifying standards, including deadlines, for submission of an application soliciting a grant of funds from the funding Board. application - The documents and other materials that an applicant submits to the RCO to support the applicant’s request for grant funds; this includes materials required for the “Application” in the RCO’s automated project information system, and other documents as noted on the application checklist including but not limited to legal opinions, maps, plans, evaluation presentations and scripts. asset - Equipment purchased by the sponsor or acquired or transferred to the sponsor for the purpose of this Agreement. This definition is restricted to non-fixed assets, including but not limited to vehicles, computers or machinery. cognizant or oversight agency - Federal agency responsible for ensuring compliance with federal audit requirements. contractor - Shall mean one not in the employment of the sponsor who is performing all or part of the eligible activities for this project under a separate Agreement with the sponsor. The term "contractor" and "contractors" means contractor(s) in any tier. development - The construction of or work resulting in new elements, including but not limited to structures, facilities, and/or materials to enhance outdoor recreation, salmon recovery or habitat conservation resources. director - The chief executive officer of the Recreation and Conservation Office or that person’s designee. elements, items and worktypes - Components of the funded project as provided in the project description. funding board - The board that authorized the funds in this Agreement, either the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board (RCFB) created under chapter 79A.25.110 RCW, or the Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) created under chapter 77.85.110 RCW. grantee - The organizational entity or individual to which a grant (or cooperative agreement) is awarded and signatory to the Agreement which is responsible and accountable both for the use of the funds provided and for the performance of the grant-supported project or activities. landowner agreement - A landowner agreement is required between a SRFB and/or RTP project sponsor and landowner for projects located on land not owned, or otherwise controlled, by the sponsor. lower tier participant - refers to any sponsor receiving a federal grant through RCO. Lower tier participants also refer to any grantee, subgrantee, or contractor of any grantee or subgrantee from the original sponsor funded by RCO. milestone - An important event with a defined deadline for an activity related to implementation of a funded project. period of performance - The time period specified in the Agreement, under Section D, period of performance. project - The undertaking that is the subject of this Agreement and that is, or may be, funded in whole or in part with funds administered by RCO on behalf of the funding board. RCO - Recreation and Conservation Office - The state office that provides administrative support to the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board and Salmon Recovery Funding Board. RCO includes the director and staff, created by Chapters 79A.25.110 and 79A.25.150 RCW and charged with administering this Agreement by Chapters 77.85.110 and 79A.25.240 RCW. reimbursement - Payment of eligible and allowable costs that have already been paid by the sponsor per the terms of the Agreement. renovation - The activities intended to improve an existing site or structure in order to increase its service life or functions. This does not include maintenance activities. restoration -Bringing a site back to its original function as part of a natural ecosystem or improving the ecological functionality of a site. RTP - Recreational Trails Program - A federal grant program administered by RCO that allows for the development and maintenance of backcountry trails. secondary sponsor - one of two or more eligible organizations that sponsors a grant-funded project. Of these two sponsors, only one - the primary sponsor - may be the fiscal agent. sponsor - The eligible applicant who has been awarded a grant of funds and is bound by this executed Agreement; includes its officers, employees, agents and successors. subgrantee - The government or other legal entity to which a subgrant is awarded and which is accountable to the grantee for the use of the funds provided. PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 6 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 103 of 344 The sponsor, and secondary sponsor where applicable, shall undertake the project as described in this Agreement, post evaluation summary, the sponsor's application, and in accordance with the sponsor's proposed goals and objectives described in the application or documents submitted with the application, all as finally approved by the funding board. All submitted documents are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein. The Order of Precedence is covered in Section 31. Timely completion of the project and submission of required documents, including progress and final reports, is important. Failure to meet critical milestones or complete the project, as set out in this Agreement, is a material breach of the Agreement. SECTION 2. PERFORMANCE BY THE SPONSOR Neither this Agreement, nor any claim arising under this Agreement, shall be transferred or assigned by the sponsor without prior written consent of the Recreation and Conservation Office. SECTION 3. ASSIGNMENT While the funding board undertakes to assist the sponsor with the project by providing a grant pursuant to this Agreement, the project itself remains the sole responsibility of the sponsor. The funding board undertakes no responsibilities to the sponsor, a secondary sponsor, or to any third party, other than as is expressly set out in this Agreement. The responsibility for the implementation of the project is solely that of the sponsor, as is the responsibility for any claim or suit of any nature by any third party related in any way to the project. When a project is sponsored by more than one entity, any and all sponsors are equally responsible for the project and all post-completion stewardship responsibilities. SECTION 4. RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROJECT The sponsor shall defend, indemnify, and hold the State and its officers and employees harmless from all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the actual or alleged acts, errors, omissions or negligence of, or the breach of any obligation under this Agreement by, the sponsor or the sponsor’s agents, employees, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the sponsor may be legally liable. Provided that nothing herein shall require a sponsor to defend or indemnify the State against and hold harmless the State from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the negligence of, or breach of any obligation under this Agreement by the State, its agents, officers, employees, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the State may be legally liable. Provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) the sponsor or the sponsor’s agents, employees, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the Sponsor is legally liable, and (b) the State its agents, officers, employees , subcontractors and or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the State may be legally liable, the indemnity obligation shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the sponsor’s negligence or the negligence of the sponsor’s agents, employees, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the sponsor may be legally liable. This provision shall be included in any Agreement between sponsor and any subcontractor and vendor, of any tier. The sponsor shall also defend, indemnify, and hold the State and its officers and employees harmless from all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from the alleged patent or copyright infringement or other allegedly improper appropriation or use of trade secrets, patents, proprietary information, know-how, copyright rights or inventions by the sponsor or the sponsor’s agents, employees, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the sponsor may be legally liable, in performance of the Work under this Agreement or arising out of any use in connection with the Agreement of methods, processes, designs, information or other items furnished or communicated to State, its agents, officers and employees pursuant to the Agreement; provided that this indemnity shall not apply to any alleged patent or copyright infringement or other allegedly improper appropriation or use of trade secrets, patents, proprietary information, know-how, copyright rights or inventions resulting from State’s, its agents’, officers’ and employees’ failure to comply with specific written instructions regarding use provided to State, its agents, officers and employees by the sponsor, its agents, employees, subcontractors or vendors, of any tier, or any other persons for whom the sponsor may be legally liable. The sponsor specifically assumes potential liability for actions brought by the sponsor’s own employees or its agents against the State and, solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the sponsor specifically waives any immunity under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW. The RCO is included within the term State, as are all other agencies, departments, boards, or other entities of state government. SECTION 5. INDEMNIFICATION The sponsor and its employees or agents performing under this Agreement are not officers, employees or agents of the funding board or RCO. The sponsor will not hold itself out as nor claim to be an officer, employee or agent of RCO, a funding board or of the state of Washington, nor will the sponsor make any claim of right, privilege or benefit which would accrue to an employee under Chapters 41.06 or 28B RCW. The sponsor is responsible for withholding and/or paying employment taxes, insurance, or deductions of any kind required by federal, SECTION 6. INDEPENDENT CAPACITY OF THE SPONSOR PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 7 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 104 of 344 state, and/or local laws. Notwithstanding any determination by the Executive Ethics Board or other tribunal, RCO may, in its sole discretion, by written notice to the sponsor terminate this Agreement if it is found after due notice and examination by RCO that there is a violation of the Ethics in Public Service Act, Chapter 42.52 RCW; or any similar statute involving the sponsor in the procurement of, or performance under, this Agreement. In the event this Agreement is terminated as provided above, RCO shall be entitled to pursue the same remedies against the sponsor as it could pursue in the event of a breach of the Agreement by the sponsor. The rights and remedies of RCO provided for in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. SECTION 7. CONFLICT OF INTEREST SECTION 8. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND SIGNS Publications. The sponsor shall include language which acknowledges the funding contribution of the applicable grant program to this project in any release or other publication developed or modified for, or referring to, the project during the project period and in the future. A. Signs. The sponsor also shall post signs or other appropriate media during the project period and in the future at project entrances and other locations on the project which acknowledge the applicable grant program's funding contribution, unless exempted in funding board policy or waived by the director. B. Ceremonies. The sponsor shall notify RCO no later than two weeks before a dedication ceremony for this project. The sponsor shall verbally acknowledge the applicable grant program’s funding contribution at all dedication ceremonies. C. Federally Funded Projects. When issuing statements, press releases, requests for proposals, bid solicitations, and other documents describing a project funded in whole or in part with federal money provided for in this grant, sponsors shall clearly state: 1. The percentage of the total costs of the project that is financed with federal money ; 2. The dollar amount of federal funds for the project; and 3. The percentage and dollar amount of the total costs of the project that is financed by nongovernmental sources . D. The sponsor will implement the Agreement in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations and RCO and funding board policies regardless of whether the sponsor is a public or non-public organization. The sponsor shall comply with, and RCO is not responsible for determining compliance with, any and all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and/or policies, including, but not limited to: State Environmental Policy Act; Industrial Insurance Coverage; Architectural Barriers Act; permits (shoreline, Hydraulics Project Approval, demolition); land use regulations (critical areas ordinances, Growth Management Act); federal and state safety and health regulations (Occupational Safety and Health Administration/Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act); and Buy American Act. Endangered Species For habitat restoration projects funded in part or whole with federal funds administered by the SRFB the sponsor shall not commence with clearing of riparian trees or in-water work unless either the sponsor has complied with 50 CFR 223.203 (b)(8), limit 8 or until an Endangered Species Act consultation is finalized in writing by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Violation of this requirement may be grounds for terminating this project Agreement. This section shall not be the basis for any enforcement responsibility by RCO. Nondiscrimination Laws The sponsor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local nondiscrimination laws and/or policies, including but not limited to: the Americans with Disabilities Act; Civil Rights Act; and the Age Discrimination Act. In the event of the sponsor’s noncompliance or refusal to comply with any nondiscrimination law or policy, the Agreement may be rescinded, cancelled, or terminated in whole or in part, and the sponsor may be declared ineligible for further grant awards from the funding board. The sponsor is responsible for any and all costs or liability arising from the sponsor’s failure to so comply with applicable law. Wages and Job Safety The sponsor agrees to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies of the United States and the State of Washington which affect wages and job safety. The sponsor agrees when state prevailing wage laws (RCW 39.12) are applicable, to comply with such laws, to pay the prevailing rate of wage to all workers, laborers, or mechanics employed in the performance of any part of this contract, and to file a statement of intent to pay prevailing wage with the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries as required by RCW 39.12.040. The sponsor also agrees to comply with the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act, and other federal laws, and the rules and regulations of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. Archaeological and Cultural Resources The RCO reviews all applicable projects for potential impacts to archaeological sites and state cultural resources. The sponsor must comply with Executive Order 05-05 or the National Historic Preservation Act before initiating ground disturbing activity. The funding board requires documented compliance with Executive Order 05-05 or Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, whichever is applicable to the project. If a federal agency declines to consult, the sponsor shall comply with the requirements of SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 8 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 105 of 344 Executive Order 05-05. In the event that archaeological or historic materials are discovered during project activities, work in the location of discovery and immediate vicinity must stop instantly, the area must be secured, and notification must be provided to the following: concerned Tribes’ cultural staff and cultural committees, RCO, and the State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. If human remains are discovered during project activity, work in the location of discovery and immediate vicinity must stop instantly, the area must be secured, and notification provided to the concerned Tribe’s cultural staff and cultural committee, RCO, State Department of Archaeology, the coroner and local law enforcement in the most expeditious manner possible according to RCW 68.50 Restrictions on Grant Use No part of any funds provided under this grant shall be used, other than for normal and recognized executive-legislative relationships, for publicity or propaganda purposes, or for the preparation, distribution, or use of any kit, pamphlet, booklet, publication, radio, television, or video presentation designed to support or defeat legislation pending before the U.S. Congress or any state legislature. No part of any funds provided under this grant shall be used to pay the salary or expenses of any sponsor, or agent acting for such sponsor, related to any activity designed to influence legislation or appropriations pending before the U.S. Congress or any state legislature. SECTION 10. HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES Certification. The sponsor shall inspect, investigate, and conduct an environmental audit of the proposed acquisition site for the presence of hazardous substances, as defined in Chapter 70.105D.020 (10) RCW, and certify: A. No hazardous substances were found on the site, or1. Any hazardous substances found have been treated and/or disposed of in compliance with applicable state and federal laws, and the site deemed “clean.” 2. Responsibility. Nothing in this provision alters the sponsor's duties and liabilities regarding hazardous substances as set forth in Chapter 70.105D RCW. B. Hold Harmless. The sponsor will defend, protect and hold harmless RCO and any and all of its employees and/or agents, from and against any and all liability, cost (including but not limited to all costs of defense and attorneys' fees) and any and all loss of any nature from any and all claims or suits resulting from the presence of, or the release or threatened release of, hazardous substances on the property the sponsor is acquiring. C. SECTION 11. RECORDS Maintenance. The sponsor shall maintain books, records, documents, data and other evidence relating to this Agreement and performance of the services described herein, including but not limited to accounting procedures and practices which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended in the performance of this Agreement. Sponsor shall retain such records for a period of six years from the date RCO deems the project complete , as defined in Section 17(C) below. If any litigation, claim or audit is started before the expiration of the six (6) year period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. A. Access to records and data. At no additional cost, the records relating to the Agreement, including materials generated under the Agreement, shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, review or audit by RCO, personnel duly authorized by RCO, the Office of the State Auditor, and federal and state officials so authorized by law, regulation or Agreement. This includes access to all information that supports the costs submitted for payment under the grant and all findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the sponsor’s reports, including computer models and methodology for those models. B. Public Records. Sponsor acknowledges that the funding board is subject to chapter 42.56 RCW and that this Agreement and any records sponsor submits or has submitted to the State shall be a public record as defined in chapter 42.56 RCW. Additionally, in compliance with RCW 77.85.130(8), sponsor agrees to disclose any information in regards to expenditure of any funding received from the SRFB. By submitting any record to the state sponsor understands that the State may be requested to disclose or copy that record under the state public records law, currently codified at RCW 42.56. The sponsor warrants that it possesses such legal rights as are necessary to permit the State to disclose and copy such document to respond to a request under state public records laws. The Sponsor hereby agrees to release the State from any claims arising out of allowing such review or copying pursuant to a public records act request, and to indemnify against any claims arising from allowing such review or copying and pay the reasonable cost of state’s defense of such claims. C. SECTION 12. TREATMENT OF ASSETS Assets shall remain in the possession of the sponsor for the duration of the project or applicable grant program. When the sponsor discontinues use of the asset(s) for the purpose for which it was funded, RCO will require the sponsor to deliver the asset(s) to RCO, dispose of the asset according to RCO policies, or return the fair market value of the asset(s) to RCO. Assets shall be used only for the purpose of this Agreement, unless otherwise provided herein or approved by RCO in writing. A. The sponsor shall be responsible for any loss or damage to assets which results from the negligence of the sponsor or which results from the failure on the part of the sponsor to maintain and administer that asset in accordance with sound management practices. B. PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 9 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 106 of 344 The sponsor shall provide right of access to the project to RCO, or any of its officers, or to any other authorized agent or official of the state of Washington or the federal government, at all reasonable times, in order to monitor and evaluate performance, compliance, and/or quality assurance under this Agreement. If a landowner agreement or other form of control and tenure has been executed, it will further stipulate and define the funding board and RCO’s right to inspect and access lands acquired or developed with funding board assistance. SECTION 13. RIGHT OF INSPECTION Sponsor agrees to perform monitoring and stewardship functions as stated in policy documents approved by the funding boards or RCO. Sponsor further agrees to utilize, where applicable and financially feasible, any monitoring protocols recommended by the funding board. SECTION 14. STEWARDSHIP AND MONITORING SECTION 15. DEBARMENT CERTIFICATION For Federally Funded Projects By signing the Agreement with RCO, the sponsor certifies that neither it nor its principals nor any other lower tier participant are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. Further, the sponsor agrees not to enter into any arrangements or contracts related to this Agreement with any party that is on the Office of Inspector General Suspension and Debarment List at http://www.gsaig.gov/index.cfm?LinkServID=C4C89080-D2BE-D29A-96355D44A13E4356. The sponsor (prospective lower tier participant) shall provide immediate written notice to RCO if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that the above certification was not correct when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. A. For State Funded Projects By signing the Agreement with RCO, the sponsor certifies that neither it nor its principals nor any other lower tier participant are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by Washington State Labor and Industries. Further, the sponsor agrees not to enter into any arrangements or contracts related to this Agreement with any party that is on the “Contractors not Allowed to Bid on Public Works Projects” list at http://www.lni.wa.gov/TradesLicensing/PrevWage/AwardingAgencies/DebarredContractors/ B. SECTION 16. PROJECT FUNDING Additional Amounts. The funding board shall not be obligated to pay any amount beyond the dollar amount as identified in this Agreement, unless an additional amount has been approved in advance by the funding board or director and incorporated by written amendment into this Agreement. A. Before the Agreement. No expenditure made, or obligation incurred, by the sponsor before the project start date shall be eligible for grant funds, in whole or in part, unless specifically provided for by funding board policy, such as a waiver of retroactivity or program specific eligible pre-Agreement costs. For reimbursements of such costs, this Agreement must be fully executed and an original received by RCO. The dollar amounts identified in this Agreement may be reduced as necessary to exclude any such expenditure from reimbursement. B. After the period of performance. No expenditure made, or obligation incurred, following the period of performance shall be eligible, in whole or in part, for grant funds hereunder. In addition to any remedy the funding board may have under this Agreement, the grant amounts identified in this Agreement shall be reduced to exclude any such expenditure from participation. C. Disclosure notice. Projects funded with state Salmon Recovery Funding Board and Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration money may be used by RCO, the Puget Sound Partnership or Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission as match to one of the following federal assistance agreements: 1) United States Department of Commerce Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 11.438, or 2) United State Environmental Protection Agency Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 66.123 and 66.456. D. Compliance and Retainage. RCO reserves the right to withhold disbursement of up to the final ten percent (10%) of the total amount of the grant to the sponsor until the project has been completed. A project is considered "complete" when: 1. All approved or required activities outlined in the Agreement are done; 2. On-site signs are in place (if applicable); C. Compliance and Payment. The obligation of RCO to pay any amount(s) under this Agreement is expressly conditioned on strict compliance with the terms of this Agreement by the sponsor. B. This contract is administered on a reimbursement basis. The sponsors may only request reimbursement after eligible and allowable costs have already been paid by the sponsor and remitted to their vendors. RCO will then reimburse the sponsor for those costs based upon RCO’s percentage as defined in Section F of the Project Agreement of the amount billed to RCO. RCO does not reimburse for donations which the sponsor may use as part of its percentage. All reimbursement requests must include proper documentation of expenditures as required by RCO. A. SECTION 17. PROJECT REIMBURSEMENTS PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 10 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 107 of 344 3. A final project report is submitted to and accepted by RCO; 4. Any other required documents are complete and submitted to RCO; 5. A final reimbursement request is submitted to RCO; 6. The completed project has been accepted by RCO; 7. Final amendments have been processed; and 8. Fiscal transactions are complete. 9. RCO has accepted a final boundary map, if required for the project, for which the Agreement terms will apply in the future. Reimbursement Request Frequency. Sponsors are encouraged to send RCO a reimbursement request at least quarterly. Sponsors are required to submit a reimbursement request to RCO, at a minimum for each project at least once a year for reimbursable activities occurring between July 1 and June 30. Sponsors must refer to the most recently published/adopted RCO policies and procedures regarding reimbursement requirements. D. Advance payments of or in anticipation of goods or services to be provided under this Agreement are limited to grants approved by the SRFB and must comply with SRFB policy. See WAC 420-12-060 (5). SECTION 18. ADVANCE PAYMENTS In the event that the sponsor fails to expend funds under this Agreement in accordance with state and federal laws, and/or the provisions of the Agreement, or meet its percentage of the project total, RCO reserves the right to recover grant award funds in the amount equivalent to the extent of noncompliance in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity. The sponsor shall reimburse RCO for any overpayment or erroneous payments made under the Agreement. Repayment by the sponsor of such funds under this recovery provision shall occur within 30 days of demand by RCO. Interest shall accrue at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum from the time that payment becomes due and owing. SECTION 19. RECOVERY OF PAYMENTS The sponsor warrants that no person or selling agent has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this Agreement on an Agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee, excepting bona fide employees or bona fide established agents maintained by the sponsor for the purpose of securing business. RCO shall have the right, in the event of breach of this clause by the sponsor, to terminate this Agreement without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the Agreement grant amount or consideration or recover by other means the full amount of such commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee. SECTION 20. COVENANT AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES The following provisions shall be in force only if the project described in this Agreement is for development, renovation and restoration of land or facilities for outdoor recreation, habitat conservation, or salmon recovery: SECTION 21. PROVISIONS APPLYING TO DEVELOPMENT, RENOVATION AND RESTORATION PROJECTS Document Review and Approval. The sponsor agrees to submit one copy of all development, renovation, restoration or construction plans and specifications to RCO for review prior to implementation. Review and approval by RCO will be for compliance with the terms of this Agreement. A. Contracts for Development, Renovation, or Restoration. Sponsors must have a procurement process that follows applicable state and/or required federal procurement principles. If no such process exists the sponsor must follow these minimum procedures: (1) publish a notice to the public requesting bids/proposals for the project (2) specify in the notice the date for submittal of bids/proposals (3)specify in the notice the general procedure and criteria for selection; and (4) comply with the same legal standards regarding unlawful discrimination based upon race, ethnicity, sex, or sex-orientation that are applicable to state agencies in selecting a bidder or proposer. This procedure creates no rights for the benefit of third parties, including any proposers, and may not be enforced or subject to review of any kind or manner by any other entity other than the RCO. Sponsors may be required to certify to the RCO that they have followed any applicable state and/or federal procedures or the above minimum procedure where state or federal procedures do not apply. B. Contract Change Order. Only change orders that impact the amount of funding or changes to the scope of the project as described to and approved by the funding board or RCO must receive prior written approval. C. Control and Tenure. The sponsor must provide documentation that shows appropriate tenure (landowner agreement, long term lease, easement, or fee simple ownership) for the land proposed for development, renovation or restoration. The documentation must meet current RCO requirements. D. Nondiscrimination. Except where a nondiscrimination clause required by a federal funding agency is used, the sponsor shall insert the following nondiscrimination clause in each contract for construction of this project: E. "During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees to comply with all federal and state nondiscrimination laws, regulations and policies.” Use of Best Management Practices. Project sponsors are encouraged to use best management practices developed as part of the Washington State Aquatic Habitat Guidelines (AHG) Program. The best management practices are described in three documents: “Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines: Final Draft”, 2004; “Design of Road Culverts for Fish Passage”, 2003; and “Integrated Streambank Protection Guidelines”, 2002. These documents and other information can be found on the AHG website. F. PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 11 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 108 of 344 Conveyance of Rights to the State of Washington. Document securing long-term rights for the State of Washington. When real property rights (both fee simple and lesser interests) are acquired, the sponsor agrees to execute an appropriate document conveying certain rights and responsibilities to RCO, on behalf of the State of Washington. These documents include a Deed of Right, Assignment of Rights, Easements and/or Leases. The sponsor agrees to use document language provided by RCO, to record the executed document in the County where the real property lies, and to provide a copy of the recorded document to RCO. The document required will vary depending on the project type, the real property rights being acquired and whether or not those rights are being acquired in perpetuity. D. Legal Description of Real Property Rights Acquired. The legal description of the real property rights purchased with funding assistance provided through this project Agreement (and protected by a recorded conveyance of rights to the State of Washington) shall be incorporated into the Agreement before final payment. C. Evidence of Title. The sponsor agrees to provide documentation that shows the type of ownership interest for the property that has been acquired. This shall be done before any payment of financial assistance. B. Evidence of Land Value. Before disbursement of funds by RCO as provided under this Agreement, the sponsor agrees to supply documentation acceptable to RCO that the cost of the property rights acquired has been established according to funding board policy. A. The following provisions shall be in force only if the project described in this Agreement is for the acquisition of interest in real property (including easements) for outdoor recreation, habitat conservation, salmon recovery purposes, or farmland preservation: SECTION 22. PROVISIONS APPLYING TO ACQUISITION PROJECTS Easements and Leases. The sponsor may incorporate required language from the Deed of Right or Assignment of Rights directly into the easement or lease document, thereby eliminating the requirement for a separate document. Language will depend on the situation; sponsor must obtain RCO approval on the draft language prior to executing the easement or lease. 3. Assignment of Rights. The Assignment of Rights document transfers certain rights such as access and enforcement to RCO. Sponsors shall use this document when an easement or lease is being acquired for habitat conservation or salmon recovery purposes. The Assignment of Rights requires the signature of the underlying landowner and must be incorporated by reference in the easement document. 2. Deed of Right. The Deed of Right conveys to the people of the state of Washington the right to preserve, protect, and/or use the property for public purposes consistent with the fund source. Sponsors shall use this document when acquiring real property rights that include the underlying land. This document may also be applicable for those easements where the sponsor has acquired a perpetual easement for public purposes. 1. Real Property Acquisition and Relocation AssistanceE. When federal funds are part of this Agreement, the Sponsor agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 1894 (1970)--Public Law 91-646, as amended by the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act, PL 100-17-1987, and applicable regulations and procedures of the federal agency implementing that Act. 1. Housing and Relocation. In the event that housing and relocation costs, as required by federal law set out in subsection (1) above and/or state law set out in subsection (2) above, are involved in the execution of this project, the sponsor agrees to provide any housing and relocation assistance required. 3. When state funds are part of this Agreement, the sponsor agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policy of the State of Washington, Chapter 8.26 RCW, and Chapter 468-100 WAC. 2. Buildings and Structures. In general, grant funds are to be used for outdoor recreation, habitat conservation, or salmon recovery. Sponsors agree to remove or demolish ineligible structures. Sponsors must consult RCO regarding compliance with section 9 - Archaeological and Cultural Resources before structures are removed or demolished. F. The sponsor shall not at any time convert any real property or facility acquired, developed, renovated, and/or restored pursuant to this Agreement to uses other than those purposes for which funds were approved without prior approval of the funding board in compliance with applicable statutes, rules, and funding board policies. It is the intent of the funding board’s conversion policy, current or as amended in the future, that all real property or facilities acquired, developed, renovated, and/or restored with funding assistance remain in the public domain in perpetuity unless otherwise identified in the Agreement or as approved by the funding board. Determination of whether a conversion has occurred shall be based upon applicable law and RCFB/SRFB policies. For acquisition projects that are term limited, such as one involving a lease or a term-limited restoration, renovation, or development project or easement, this restriction on conversion shall apply only for the length of the term, unless otherwise provided in written documents or required by applicable state or federal law. In such case, the restriction applies to such projects for the length of the term specified by the lease, easement, deed, or landowner agreement. When a conversion has been determined to have occurred, the sponsor is required to remedy the conversion per established funding board policies. SECTION 23. RESTRICTION ON CONVERSION OF REAL PROPERTY AND/OR FACILITIES TO OTHER USES PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 12 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 109 of 344 According to applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including public health standards and building codes.A. For acquisition, development, renovation and restoration projects, sponsors must ensure that properties or facilities assisted with funding board funds, including undeveloped sites, are built, operated, used, and maintained: SECTION 24. CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, USE AND MAINTENANCE OF ASSISTED PROJECTS In a reasonably safe condition for the project’s intended use.B. Throughout its estimated life so as to prevent undue deterioration.C. In compliance with all federal and state nondiscrimination laws, regulations and policies.D. Be available for use by the general public without reservation at reasonable hours and times of the year, according to the type of area or facility. G. Appear attractive and inviting to the public except for brief installation, construction, or maintenance periods.F. Be constructed and maintained to meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the most current local or state codes, Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards, guidelines, or rules, including but not limited to: the International Building Code, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Architectural Barriers Act, as updated. E. For acquisition, development, renovation and restoration projects, facilities open and accessible to the general public must: Income.A. SECTION 25. INCOME AND INCOME USE Fees. User and/or other fees may be charged in connection with land acquired or facilities developed with funding board grants if the fees are consistent with the: (a) Value of any service(s) furnished; (b) Value of any opportunities furnished; and (c) Prevailing range of public fees in the state for the activity involved. Excepted are Firearms and Archery Range Recreation Program safety classes (firearm and/or hunter) for which a facility/range fee must not be charged (Chapter 79A.25.210 RCW). 2. Compatible source. The source of any income generated in a funded project or project area must be compatible with the funding source and the Agreement. 1. Income use. Regardless of whether income or fees in a project work site (including entrance, utility corridor permit, cattle grazing, timber harvesting, farming, etc.) are gained during or after the reimbursement period cited in the Agreement, unless precluded by state or federal law, the revenue may only be used to offset: B. The sponsor’s matching funds;1. The project’s total cost; 2. The expense of operation, maintenance, stewardship, monitoring, and/or repair of the facility or program assisted by the funding board grant; 3. The expense of operation, maintenance, stewardship, monitoring, and/or repair of other similar units in the sponsor’s system; and/or 4. Capital expenses for similar acquisition and/or development.5. Sponsors shall not express a preference for users of grant assisted projects on the basis of residence (including preferential reservation, membership, and/or permit systems) except that reasonable differences in admission and other fees may be maintained on the basis of residence. Even so, the funding board discourages the imposition of differential fees. Fees for nonresidents must not exceed twice the fee imposed on residents. Where there is no fee for residents but a fee is charged to nonresidents, the nonresident fee shall not exceed the amount that would be imposed on residents at comparable state or local public facilities. SECTION 26. PREFERENCES FOR RESIDENTS A corporate sponsor, including any nonprofit sponsor, shall: SECTION 27. PROVISIONS RELATED TO CORPORATE (INCLUDING NONPROFIT) SPONSORS Maintain corporate status with the state, including registering with the Washington Secretary of State’s office, throughout the sponsor’s obligation to the project as identified in the Agreement. A. Notify RCO prior to corporate dissolution. Within 30 days of dissolution the sponsor shall name a qualified successor that will agree in writing to assume any on-going project responsibilities. A qualified successor is any party eligible to apply for funds in the subject grant program and capable of complying with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. RCO will process an amendment transferring the sponsor’s obligation to the qualified successor if requirements are met. B. Sites or facilities open to the public may not require exclusive use, (e.g., members only).C. PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 13 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 110 of 344 The sponsor of a firearms or archery range recreation project shall procure an endorsement, or other addition, to liability insurance it may currently carry, or shall procure a new policy of liability insurance, in a total coverage amount the sponsor deems adequate to ensure it will have resources to pay successful claims of persons who may be killed or injured, or suffer damage to property, while present at the range facility to which this grant is related, or by reason of being in the vicinity of that facility; provided that the coverage shall be at least one million dollars ($1,000,000) for the death of, or injury to, each person. A. SECTION 28. LIABILITY INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR FIREARMS AND ARCHERY RANGE SPONSORS The liability insurance policy, including any endorsement or addition, shall name Washington State, the funding board, and RCO as additional insured and shall be in a form approved by the funding board or director. B. The policy, endorsement or other addition, or a similar liability insurance policy meeting the requirements of this section, shall be kept in force throughout the sponsor's obligation to the project as identified in this Agreement. C. The policy, as modified by any endorsement or other addition, shall provide that the issuing company shall give written notice to RCO not less than thirty (30) calendar days in advance of any cancellation of the policy by the insurer, and within ten (10) calendar days following any termination of the policy by the sponsor. D. The requirement of Subsection A through D above shall not apply if the sponsor is a federal, state, or municipal government which has established a program of self-insurance or a policy of self-insurance with respect to claims arising from its facilities or activities generally, including such facilities as firearms or archery ranges, when the applicant declares and describes that program or policy as a part of its application to the funding board. E. By this requirement, the funding board and RCO does not assume any duty to any individual person with respect to death, injury, or damage to property which that person may suffer while present at, or in the vicinity of, the facility to which this grant relates. Any such person, or any other person making claims based on such death, injury, or damage, must look to the sponsor, or others, for any and all remedies that may be available by law. F. If the project has been approved by the National Park Service, US Department of the Interior, for funding assistance from the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), the “Project Agreement General Provisions” in the LWCF State Assistance Program Federal Financial Assistance Manual are also made part of this Agreement. The sponsor shall abide by these LWCF General Provisions, in addition to this Agreement, as they now exist or are hereafter amended. Further, the sponsor agrees to provide RCO with reports or documents needed to meet the requirements of the LWCF General Provisions. SECTION 29. REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE For projects funded through the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program Farmland Preservation Account, the following sections will not apply if covered separately in a recorded RCO approved Agricultural Conservation Easement. • Section 8 - Acknowledgement and Signs, • Section 10 - Hazardous Substances, • Section 14 - Stewardship and Monitoring • Section 22 - Provisions Applying to Acquisition Projects, Sub-sections F and G. • Section 23 - Restriction on Conversion of Real Property and/or Facilities to Other Uses, • Section 24 - Construction, Operation, Use and Maintenance of Assisted Projects, Sub-sections E, F, G, and • Section 25 - Income and Income Use SECTION 30. FARMLAND PRESERVATION ACCOUNT This Agreement is entered into, pursuant to, and under the authority granted by applicable federal and state laws. The provisions of the Agreement shall be construed to conform to those laws. In the event of an inconsistency in the terms of this Agreement, or between its terms and any applicable statute, rule, or policy or procedure, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: SECTION 31. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE Applicable federal and/or state statutes, regulations, policies and procedures including RCO/funding board policies and procedures, applicable federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circulars and federal and state executive orders; A. Project agreement including attachments;B. Special Conditions;C. Standard Terms and Conditions of the Project Agreement.D. Amendments to this Agreement shall be binding only if in writing and signed by personnel authorized to bind each of the parties except period of performance extensions and minor scope adjustments need only be signed by RCO’s director or designee. SECTION 32. AMENDMENTS Only RCO or RCO’s delegate by writing (delegation to be made prior to action) shall have the express, implied, or apparent authority to alter, amend, modify, or waive any clause or condition of this Agreement. Furthermore, any alteration, amendment, modification, or waiver of any clause or condition of this Agreement is not effective or binding unless made in writing and signed by RCO. SECTION 33. LIMITATION OF AUTHORITY PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 14 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 111 of 344 Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver or breach of any provision of the Agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of the Agreement unless stated to be such in writing, signed by the director, or the director’s designee, and attached to the original Agreement. SECTION 34. WAIVER OF DEFAULT The funding board and RCO rely on the sponsor’s application in making its determinations as to eligibility for, selection for, and scope of, funding grants. Any misrepresentation, error or inaccuracy in any part of the application may be deemed a breach of this Agreement. SECTION 35. APPLICATION REPRESENTATIONS -- MISREPRESENTATIONS OR INACCURACY OR BREACH The funding board and RCO may enforce this Agreement by the remedy of specific performance, which usually will mean completion of the project as described in this Agreement. However, the remedy of specific performance shall not be the sole or exclusive remedy available to RCO. No remedy available to the funding board or RCO shall be deemed exclusive. The funding board or RCO may elect to exercise any, a combination of, or all of the remedies available to it under this Agreement, or under any provision of law, common law, or equity. SECTION 36. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE The funding board and RCO will require strict compliance by the sponsor with all the terms of this Agreement including, but not limited to, the requirements of the applicable statutes, rules and all funding board and RCO policies, and with the representations of the sponsor in its application for a grant as finally approved by the funding board SECTION 37. TERMINATION For Cause. The funding board or the director may suspend or terminate the obligation to provide funding to the sponsor under this Agreement: i. In the event of any breach by the sponsor of any of the sponsor's obligations under this Agreement; or ii. If the sponsor fails to make progress satisfactory to the funding board or director toward completion of the project by the completion date set out in this Agreement. Included in progress is adherence to milestones and other defined deadlines In the event this Agreement is terminated by the funding board or director, under this section or any other section after any portion of the grant amount has been paid to the sponsor under this Agreement, the funding board or director may require that any amount paid be repaid to RCO for redeposit into the account from which the funds were derived. A. Non Availability of Funds. The obligation of the RCO to make payments is contingent on the availability of state and federal funds through legislative appropriation and state allotment. If amounts sufficient to fund the grant made under this Agreement are not appropriated to RCO for expenditure for this Agreement in any biennial fiscal period, RCO shall not be obligated to pay any remaining unpaid portion of this grant unless and until the necessary action by the Legislature or the Office of Financial Management occurs. If RCO participation is suspended under this section for a continuous period of one year, RCO’s obligation to provide any future funding under this Agreement shall terminate. Termination of the Agreement under this section is not subject to appeal by the sponsor. B. For Convenience. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, RCO may, by ten (10) days written notice, beginning on the second day after the mailing, terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part. If this Agreement is so terminated, RCO shall be liable only for payment required under the terms of this Agreement for services rendered or goods delivered prior to the effective date of termination. C. Except as may otherwise be provided in this Agreement, when a dispute arises between the sponsor and the funding board, which cannot be resolved, either party may request a dispute hearing according to the process set out in this section. Either party’s request for a dispute hearing must be in writing and clearly state: A. The disputed issues; B. The relative positions of the parties; C. The sponsor's name, address, project title, and the assigned project number. In order for this section to apply to the resolution of any specific dispute or disputes, the other party must agree in writing that the procedure under this section shall be used to resolve those specific issues. The dispute shall be heard by a panel of three persons consisting of one person chosen by the sponsor, one person chosen by the director, and a third person chosen by the two persons initially appointed. If a third person cannot be agreed on, the third person shall be chosen by the funding board’s chair. Any hearing under this section shall be informal, with the specific processes to be determined by the disputes panel according to the nature and complexity of the issues involved. The process may be solely based on written material if the parties so agree. The disputes panel shall be governed by the provisions of this Agreement in deciding the disputes. The parties shall be bound by the decision of the disputes panel, unless the remedy directed by that panel shall be without the authority of either or both parties to perform, as necessary, or is otherwise unlawful. Request for a disputes hearing under this section by either party shall be delivered or mailed to the other party. The request shall be delivered or mailed within thirty (30) days of the date the requesting party has received notice of the action or position of the other SECTION 38. DISPUTE HEARING PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 15 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 112 of 344 party which it wishes to dispute. The written Agreement to use the process under this section for resolution of those issues shall be delivered or mailed by the receiving party to the requesting party within thirty (30) days of receipt by the receiving party of the request. All costs associated with the implementation of this process shall be shared equally by the parties. In the event of litigation or other action brought to enforce contract terms, each party agrees to bear its own attorney fees and costs. SECTION 39. ATTORNEYS’ FEES This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event of a lawsuit involving this Agreement, venue shall be in Thurston County Superior Court if legally proper; otherwise venue shall be in a county where the project is situated. The sponsor, by execution of this Agreement acknowledges the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of Washington. In the cases where this Agreement is between the funding board and a federally recognized Indian Tribe, the following governing law/venue applies: SECTION 40. GOVERNING LAW/VENUE Notwithstanding the above venue provision, if the State of Washington intends to initiate a lawsuit against a federally recognized Indian tribe relating to the performance, breach or enforcement of this Agreement, it shall so notify the Tribe. If the Tribe believes that a good faith basis exists for subject matter jurisdiction of such a lawsuit in federal court, the Tribe shall so notify the State within five days of receipt of such notice and state the basis for such jurisdiction. If the Tribe so notifies the State, the State shall bring such lawsuit in federal court; otherwise the State may sue the Tribe in the Thurston County Superior Court. Interpretation of the Agreement shall be according to applicable State law, except to the extent preempted by federal or tribal law. In the event suit is brought in federal court and the federal court determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction to resolve the dispute between the State and Tribal Party, then the parties agree to venue in Thurston County Superior Court. A. Any judicial award, determination, order, decree or other relief, whether in law or equity or otherwise, resulting from such a lawsuit shall be binding and enforceable on the parties. Any money judgment or award against a Tribe, tribal officers and members, or the State of Washington and its officers and employees may exceed the amount provided for in Section F- Project Funding of the Agreement in order to satisfy the judgment. B. The Tribe hereby waives its sovereign immunity for suit in state court for the limited purpose of allowing the State to bring such actions as it determines necessary to give effect to this section and to the enforcement of any judgment relating to the performance or breach of this Agreement. This waiver is not for the benefit of any third party and shall not be enforceable by any third party or by any assignee of the parties. In any enforcement action, the parties shall bear their own enforcement costs, including attorneys’ fees. C. For purposes of this provision, the State includes the RCO and any other state agencies that may be assigned or otherwise obtain the right of the RCO to enforce this Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement are intended to be severable. If any term or provision is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the Agreement. SECTION 41. SEVERABILITY PROJAGR.RPT Salmon Funding Accounts Page 16 of 16 Salmon Project Agreement - RCO #14-1299P Chapter 77.85 RCW, Chapter 420 WAC Packet Page 113 of 344 Eligible Scope Activities 14-1299 Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary Design Planning City of Edmonds 12/4/2014 Project Number: Project Type: Approval: Project Sponsor: Project Title: Program:Salmon Federal Projects Planning Metrics Worksite #1, Edmonds Marsh Chinook Salmon-Puget Sound ESU, Chum Salmon-Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia ESU, Coho Salmon-Puget Sound/Strait of Georgia ESU Targeted salmonid ESU/DPS: CutthroatTargeted species (non-ESU species): 28.0Area Encompassed (acres): 0.10Miles of Stream Affected: Design for Salmon restoration Preliminary design Willow Creek Estuary Restoration Preliminary Design Name of the Plan: Shannon&Wilson. 2013. Willow Creek Daylighting Final- Early Feasibility Study, Edmonds, WA. Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th St, Suite 100, Seattle, WA 98103. 21-1-12393-206. Preliminary design to daylight Willow Creek and restore fish access to Edmonds marsh. Description of the Plan: The intent of the plan was to explore the feasibility of providing and maximizing Chinook salmon access to rearing habitat in Edmonds Marsh, and to evaluate the potential size and habitat types that would become available to juvenile salmon within the marsh. The Early Feasibility study included a conceptual design of marsh restoration actions. ELIGREIM.RPT 1Page: January 30, 2015 Packet Page 114 of 344 Milestone Report By Project 14-1299 PProject Number: Project Name: Sponsor: Willow Creek Daylighting Preliminary Design Edmonds City of Project Manager:Elizabeth Butler Target DateMilestoneX Comments/Description! Project Start 12/04/2014 Eligible Preagreement Expenses per Acquisitions Manual 5X Data Gathering Started 03/01/2015 RFP Complete/Consultant Hired 08/01/2015 Scope and Budget Negotiated. Progress Report Submitted 08/15/2015! Annual Project Billing 09/30/2015! Cultural Resources Complete 11/30/2015 If Ground Disturbing Activities are necessary.! Progress Report Submitted 01/30/2016! Draft Design to RCO 04/30/2016 Preliminary Design Deliverables per Manual 18 Appendix D-2 Progress Report Submitted 06/01/2016! Annual Project Billing 06/30/2016! Special Conditions Met 07/31/2016 Design Review comments received from stakeholders Applied for Permits 08/31/2016 Preliminary Design to RCO 11/30/2016 Preliminary Design Deliverables per Manual 18 Appendix D-2! Final Report in PRISM 12/30/2016 Agreement End Date 06/30/2017 Project End Date, all expenses must be incurred by this date.! Final Billing to RCO 08/31/2017 X = Milestone Complete ! = Critical Milestone Page:11MILESTO.RPT January 30, 2015 Packet Page 115 of 344    AM-7523     3. E.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:Consent   Submitted For:Mike De Lilla Submitted By:Megan Luttrell Department:Engineering Type: Action  Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Lynnwood to formalize roles, responsibilities and usage of existing and proposed emergency interties that interconnect watermains between the City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood. Recommendation Authorize Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement. Previous Council Action On February 24, 2015, staff presented an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Lynnwood to formalize roles, responsibilities and usage of existing and proposed emergency interties that interconnect watermains between the City of Edmonds and City of Lynnwood; Council forwarded the item to the March 3, 2015, Council meeting for approval. Narrative The City of Edmonds is in the process of designing an emergency watermain intertie that, in a watermain breakage situation/emergency situation, would allow for an emergency/alternate water source to supply approximately 150 single family residences located in the northern most part of Edmonds.  This area is currently supplied by a single 8”, 2600’ long watermain, that starts at the City’s main supply from the Alderwood Water and Wastewater District, located in Lynnwood.  The addition of the intertie will greatly decrease water outage times in emergency situations and add greater redundancy to our water system in this area of the City.   City staff has received concurrence with Lynnwood staff in regard to building this intertie.  In addition, City staff has determined that there currently is no Interlocal Agreement with Lynnwood even though Edmonds and Lynnwood have four other intertie locations.  To rectify this, the Cities of Edmonds and Lynnwood have drafted this Interlocal Agreement so that it covers roles and responsibilities for the four existing interties and the one that is currently in design. Attachments ILA with City of Lynnwood Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering (Originator)Robert English 02/25/2015 02:20 PM Packet Page 116 of 344 Public Works Phil Williams 02/25/2015 04:05 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 02/26/2015 08:04 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/26/2015 08:20 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/26/2015 09:12 AM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 02/25/2015 09:24 AM Final Approval Date: 02/26/2015  Packet Page 117 of 344 Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 1 of 6 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT 1 CITY OF EDMONDS AND CITY OF LYNNWOOD 2 For Emergency Watermain Interties 3 4 5 THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the 6 City of Edmonds, Washington (“Edmonds”) and the City of Lynnwood, Washington 7 (“Lynnwood”) (collectively, the “Parties”). 8 9 WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW authorizes two or more political subdivisions or units 10 of local government of the State of Washington to cooperate on a basis of mutual advantage to 11 provide for services and facilities; and 12 13 WHEREAS, Edmonds and Lynnwood are each authorized to provide water service, and 14 each currently provides water service to persons and properties located within its respective 15 water service area; and 16 17 WHEREAS, Edmonds’ and Lynnwood’s water service boundaries are located adjacent to 18 each other; and 19 20 WHEREAS, the Parties desired to obtain supplemental water supply for emergency 21 purposes through interties between their respective water systems, subject to certain terms and 22 conditions; and 23 24 WHEREAS, the Parties have constructed four emergency watermain interties at places 25 along their respective water service boundaries; and 26 27 WHEREAS, Edmonds is undertaking the construction of a fifth emergency watermain 28 intertie along those boundaries; and 29 30 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of defining 31 their respective rights, obligations, and liabilities regarding these emergency watermain interties; 32 and 33 34 WHEREAS, the City Councils of the City of Edmonds and the City of Lynnwood have 35 taken appropriate action to approve each Party’s entry into this Agreement; 36 37 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions and covenants contained 38 herein, Edmonds and Lynnwood agree as follows: 39 40 TERMS 41 42 Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to allocate and define the Parties’ 43 respective rights, obligations, and liabilities concerning the establishment, ownership, operation, 44 use and maintenance of the one new and four existing emergency watermain interties. The 45 Packet Page 118 of 344 Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 2 of 6 terms, conditions and covenants of this Agreement shall accordingly be interpreted to advance 1 this purpose. 2 3 Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon its execution by both of the 4 Parties hereto, as indicated by the dates written below. Unless terminated in accordance with 5 Section 3, this Agreement shall remain in effect in perpetuity. 6 7 Section 3. Termination. Either Party may terminate this Agreement with or without 8 cause by providing the other Party with thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intent to 9 terminate. Termination shall not alter the Parties’ obligations under Section 4 with respect to 10 obligations already performed by the other Party, and shall not alter the Parties’ respective 11 obligations under Section 8 of this Agreement. 12 13 Section 4. Obligations. 14 15 A. Edmonds and Lynnwood agree to provide each other with an emergency standby 16 source of water through intertie connections between the Parties’ water systems at the 17 five locations described and depicted in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated 18 herein by this reference. 19 20 B. Each intertie shall consist of water main, and two normally-closed valves, as depicted 21 on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The new, 22 fifth, intertie shall be constructed by Edmonds at its sole expense, at the location 23 described and depicted on Exhibit A. 24 25 C. To the extent necessary, each Party shall transfer ownership of any portion of an 26 intertie, including the water main and valves, that is located within the other Party’s 27 water service area boundaries by a bill of sale at no cost to the other Party. Each 28 Party shall accept the transferred intertie facilities, if any, in an “as-is” condition. 29 Each Party shall then own, operate, repair, replace and maintain in good working 30 condition and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations that portion of 31 each intertie located within its respective water service area boundaries. 32 33 D. Each intertie shall be used only in the event of an emergency as defined in Section 34 4.E, or when otherwise required due to a planned, temporary disruption of water 35 service resulting from construction or maintenance impacting the requesting Party’s 36 water system or water supply. 37 38 E. For purposes of this Agreement, an emergency shall be any event that requires either 39 Party’s water supply to be augmented on a temporary, unplanned basis, including but 40 not limited to a water shortage, a major water line break, fire demand, contamination 41 of water supply, mechanical or electrical equipment failure, or power supply failure. 42 Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the Parties, the maximum duration of an 43 emergency shall be seven calendar (7) days. 44 45 Packet Page 119 of 344 Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 3 of 6 F. In case of water supply required for emergency use, Edmonds and Lynnwood shall 1 provide water immediately upon oral notification of such emergency by the other 2 Party. Follow-up written notice of such emergency request shall be made by the 3 requesting Party to the supplying Party within fourteen (14) business days of the oral 4 notification. In the event that the requesting Party anticipates that the emergency will 5 require use of the intertie for more than seven calendar (7) days, the requesting Party 6 shall provide an estimate of the duration of the emergency and request that the 7 supplying Party agree in writing to the requesting Party’s use of the intertie for this 8 duration. 9 10 G. In case of water supply required for a planned, temporary disruption of service, the 11 requesting Party shall notify the supplying Party in writing at least five (5) business 12 days in advance of the dates on which the requesting Party desires to receive water 13 through an intertie. The request shall include the startup time and the estimated 14 duration of intertie service, and shall state the reason for the service disruption 15 requiring use of the intertie. 16 17 H. When activating intertie service, each Party shall operate their respective system 18 components only, and shall provide adequate flushing of the system prior to 19 activating the intertie. 20 21 I. The Parties shall make reasonable efforts to provide an uninterrupted supply of water 22 during any period that an intertie is activated; provided, that neither Party shall be 23 liable for any shortage of or interruption in the delivery of water through an intertie. 24 In addition, neither Party shall be liable for any failure, interruption in or shortage of 25 water, or any loss or damage resulting therefrom occasioned by any cause beyond the 26 control of either Party. Neither Party guarantees the availability of water through any 27 intertie at all times because of each Party’s respective needs and water demand. 28 Further, during critical water shortage periods as determined by a supplying Party, the 29 supplying Party, in that Party’s sole discretion, may deny use of any intertie until 30 sufficient water supply exists to make such available for use by the requesting Party. 31 32 J. The quality of water delivered by either Party through any intertie shall comply with 33 all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, and shall be of the same 34 quality as that delivered by the supplying Party to that Party’s other customers. Upon 35 request of either Party, the other Party shall provide information regarding the current 36 quality of water provided through any intertie, so that blending, compatibility, and 37 other water quality issues may be addressed. 38 39 Section 5. Billing for Water Used. 40 41 A. A written estimate of the quantity of water used shall be reported by the receiving 42 Party to the supplying Party within three (3) business days after the termination of 43 any intertie use. The estimate of water used shall be agreed upon by both parties and 44 shall include a detailed explanation as to how the estimate was derived. If the intertie 45 use continues for more than thirty (30) calendar days, the written estimate of water 46 Packet Page 120 of 344 Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 4 of 6 use shall be provided on the first day of the following month. If unmetered use of 1 water is expected to exceed thirty (30) calendar days, the recipient agency shall install 2 a meter within thirty (30) days of activation of the unmetered intertie. 3 4 B. In the event that Edmonds or Lynnwood receives water through any intertie, both 5 Parties agree to pay the other Party for such water delivered at the wholesale rate plus 6 ten percent (10%). The wholesale rate per CCF shall be determined based on the 7 preceding complete calendar year, by dividing the total annual volume of water (in 8 CCF) delivered to Edmonds’ or Lynnwood’s end users within their respective water 9 service boundaries, into the total annual costs of potable water purchased from the 10 wholesale supplier(s) during the same calendar year. The Party delivering such water 11 shall bill the Party receiving such water monthly for the amount of water delivered. 12 The Party receiving such water shall pay the supplying Party within forty-five (45) 13 calendar days of the date of such billing. Any billings not paid by the receiving Party 14 within such 45-day period shall accrue interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per 15 annum until paid. 16 17 Section 6. Ownership of Property. Neither Party shall by virtue of this Agreement 18 acquire any proprietary or governmental interest in the water system of the other Party. Each 19 Party shall be solely responsible for the operation and maintenance of its own system of water 20 distribution. 21 22 Section 7. Administration; No Separate Entity Created. This Agreement shall be 23 administered jointly by the Edmonds City Engineer and the Lynnwood City Engineer. No 24 separate legal entity is formed by this Agreement. 25 26 Section 8. Release, Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement. Each Party to this 27 Agreement shall be responsible for its own negligent and/or wrongful acts or omissions, and 28 those of its own officers, agents, employees, representatives, contractors or subcontractors, to the 29 fullest extent required by the laws of the State of Washington. Each Party agrees to protect, 30 indemnify and save the other Party harmless from and against any and all such liability for injury 31 or damage to the other Party or the other Party’s property, and also from and against all claims, 32 demands and causes of action of every kind and character arising directly or indirectly, or in any 33 way incident to, in connection with, or arising out of the performance of this Agreement, caused 34 by its own negligence or wrongful acts or omissions, or that of its officers, agents, employees, 35 representatives, contractors or subcontractors; provided, that the indemnifying Party’s obligation 36 to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other Party for claims caused by or resulting from 37 the concurrent negligence or wrongful acts or omissions of the indemnifying Party shall apply 38 only to the extent of the negligence or wrongful acts or omissions of the indemnifying Party. 39 40 Section 9. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of 41 the State of Washington. Any action arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in 42 Snohomish County Superior Court. 43 44 Section 10. No Employment Relationship Created. The Parties agree that nothing in this 45 Agreement shall be construed to create an employment relationship between Edmonds and any 46 Packet Page 121 of 344 Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 5 of 6 employee, agent, representative or contractor of Lynnwood, or between Lynnwood and any 1 employee, agent, representative or contractor of Edmonds. 2 3 Section 11. No Third Party Rights. This Agreement is intended for the sole and 4 exclusive benefit of the Parties hereto and no third Party rights are created by this Agreement. 5 6 Section 12. Notices. Notices to Edmonds shall be sent to the following address: 7 8 City of Edmonds 9 Public Works Director 10 7110 210th St SW 11 Edmonds, WA 98026 12 13 Notices to Lynnwood shall be sent to the following address: 14 15 City of Lynnwood 16 City Engineer 17 P.O. Box 5008 18 Lynnwood, WA 98046 19 20 21 Section 13. Duty to File Agreement with County Auditor. Edmonds shall, after this 22 Agreement is executed by both Parties, file this Agreement with the Snohomish County Auditor. 23 24 Section 14. Integration/Amendment. This document constitutes the entire embodiment 25 of the agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein and supersedes and 26 replaces all prior agreeements, both written and oral. This Agreement may only be modified or 27 amended by an agreement in writing signed by both Parties hereto. 28 29 Section 15. Non-Waiver. Waiver by any Party of any of the provisions contained within 30 this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision. 31 32 Section 16. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the 33 benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 34 35 36 CITY OF EDMONDS 37 38 By:_____________________________ 39 Dave Earling, Mayor 40 41 Date:_____________________________ 42 43 44 ATTEST: 45 46 Packet Page 122 of 344 Interlocal Agreement for Emergency Watermain Interties Page 6 of 6 _____________________________ 1 Scott Passey, City Clerk 2 3 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 5 6 _____________________________ 7 Office of the City Attorney 8 9 10 11 CITY OF LYNNWOOD 12 13 By:____________________________ 14 Nicola Smith, Mayor 15 16 Date:_____________________________ 17 18 19 ATTEST: 20 21 _____________________________ 22 Art Ceniza, City Clerk 23 24 25 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 26 27 _____________________________ 28 Office of the City Attorney 29 Packet Page 123 of 344 In t e r i e # In t e r t i e V a l v e L o c a t i o n (E d m o n d s ) E d m o n d s M e t e r Ed m o n d s M e t e r Si z e Ed m o n d s P i p e Si z e Ed m o n d s V a l v e # Op e n i n g i n t e r t i e In t e r t i e V a l v e L o c a t i o n (L y n n w o o d ) L y n n w o o d M e t e r Lynnwood Meter SizeLynnwood Pipe SizeLynnwood Valve # Opening intertie 1 21 0 0 0 B l o c k o f H i g h w a y 99 No No n e 8 i n c h 10 - 1 We s t s i d e o f H i g h w a y 99 a t s o u t h D r i v e w a y o f 20 9 1 0 N o N o n e 1 2 i n c h E - 3 2 In t e r s e c t i o n o f 7 6 t h Av e W a n d 2 0 8 t h S t S W N o N o n e 1 2 i n c h 1 0 - 1 9 E No n e * No None 8 inch E-1* 3 On O l y m p i c V i e w D r i v e ap p r o x 1 7 0 f e e t w e s t o f in t e r s e c t i o n w i t h 7 3 r d Av e W N o N o n e 8 i n c h 6- 4 2 A So u t h w e s t h i l l s i d e n e a r wa l k i n g p a t h n e a r Ol y m p i c V i e w D r i v e a n d 73 r d A v e W No None 8 inch E-4 4 In t e r s e c t i o n o f O l y m p i c Vi e w D r i v e a n d 1 8 0 t h St S W N o N o n e 8 I n c h 3 - 1 4 A Ol y m p i c V i e w D r i v e E a s t si d e a t 1 8 0 t h S t S W No None 8 inch E-15 5 On 6 8 t h A v e W N o r t h of t h e i n t e r s e c t i o n o f No r t h M e a d o w d a l e Ro a d Y e s 6 i n c h ( T o B e co n s t r u c t e d b y en d o f 2 0 1 5 ) 8 i n c h ( T o B e co n s t r u c t e d b y en d o f 2 0 1 5 ) T o b e d e t e r m i n e d On 6 8 t h A v e W N o r t h o f th e i n t e r s e c t i o n o f No r t h M e a d o w d a l e Ro a d N o N o n e 8 inch (To Be constructed by end of 2015) T o b e d e t e r m i n e d *E - 1 i s E d m o n d s i n t e r t i e v a l v e a t t h i s l o c a t i o n . L y n n w o o d d o e s n o t h a v e a v a l v e a t t h i s i n t e r t i e l o c a t i o n . Ex h i b i t A In t e r t i e L o c a t i o n M a t r i x Packet Page 124 of 344    AM-7524     3. F.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:Consent   Submitted For:Mike De Lilla Submitted By:Megan Luttrell Department:Engineering Type: Action  Information Subject Title Authorization for Mayor to sign a Supplemental Agreement with The Blueline Group for Capital Projects Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Services for 2015. Recommendation Authorize Mayor to sign the Supplemental Agreement. Previous Council Action On May 6, 2014 Council approved a professional services agreement with The Blueline Group (Blueline) to provide Capital Projects Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Services for 2014.   On February 24, 2015 staff presented a Supplemental Agreement with The Blueline Group for Capital Projects Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Services for 2015; Council forwarded the item to the consent agenda at the March 3, 2015 Council meeting.  Narrative The City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in February, 2014 to hire a consultant to support City staff with construction management, engineering and inspection services for various City funded capital projects that are scheduled to begin construction in 2014 and 2015. The City received statements of qualifications from twelve engineering firms and the selection committee chose The Blueline Group to provide services during construction based on their qualifications, experience and approach.   The proposed supplemental agreement will provide construction management and inspection services for construction projects beginning in 2015 and closeout projects that started in 2014.  The City has negotiated a consultant fee of $293,200.  The supplemental work will be funded by utility funds budgeted for the projects listed below:     1. 2015 Sewerline Replacement Budget: $2.05M Status: 90% Design Construction: June 2015 – December 2015 2. 105th & 106th Ave SW Drainage Improvement Project (SW Edmonds Storm Project) Budget: $517,000 Status: 90% Design Packet Page 125 of 344 Construction: June 2015 – September 2015   3. Citywide Storm Drainage Improvements Budget: $220,000 Status: 90% Design Construction: June 2015 – September 2015 4. 2015 Waterline Replacement Project Budget: $2.73M Status: 90% Design Construction: June 2015 - January 2016   Each project will be managed by a City Capital Projects Manager. The consultant will assist the City’s project manager by providing daily field inspection and assisting with contract administration duties such as preparation of monthly pay estimates, review of contractor’s progress schedule, manage request for information (RFI’s) log, change order documentation, review certified payrolls, coordinate on-site material testing, assist with project close-out activities, respond to citizen questions and other duties as outlined in the scope of work.     Attachments The Blueline Group Supplemental Agreement Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering (Originator)Robert English 02/25/2015 02:17 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/25/2015 04:04 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 02/26/2015 08:04 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/26/2015 08:20 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/26/2015 09:12 AM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 02/25/2015 09:27 AM Final Approval Date: 02/26/2015  Packet Page 126 of 344 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT Capital Projects Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Services WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and The Blueline Group, hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”, entered into an underlying agreement for design, engineering and consulting services with respect to a project known as Capital Projects Construction Management, Engineering & Inspection Services project, dated May 7, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a consulting firm to provide consulting services; NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of mutual benefits occurring, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The underlying Agreement of May 7, 2014 between the parties, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth, is amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the underlying agreement shall be amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 1.2 The $170,000.00 amount set forth in paragraph 2A of the underlying Agreement and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed amount of $293,200 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the total contract amount is increased to a new total not-to-exceed amount of $463,200 ($170,000 plus $293,200). 1.3 Exhibit B to the underlying agreement consisting of the rate and cost reimbursement schedule is hereby amended to include the form set forth on the attached Exhibit B to this addendum, incorporated by this reference as fully as if herein set forth. 2. In all other respects, the underlying agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth herein, but only as set forth herein. Packet Page 127 of 344 DONE this day of , 20 . CITY OF EDMONDS THE BLUELINE GROUP By: By: Mayor David O. Earling Title: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 20____, before me, the under-signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Packet Page 128 of 344 Exhibit ‘A’ to the Contract Agreement for Professional Services between The Blueline Group, LLC and the City of Edmonds for Construction Services for 2015 Projects, dated February 6, 2015. Task 001 – CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES Fee: Time and Expense (Estimated $224,700) Blueline will provide as-needed inspection services at the City’s request during the 2015 construction season, and will coordinate construction management activities with the City. Services under this task are anticipated to include: 1. Review plans/specifications and visit the site. 2. Review materials delivered to the site to review compliance with City approved submittals. 3. Provide inspection for all aspects of the construction activity to review Contractor compliance with the contract plans and specifications. 4. Coordinate compaction and materials testing with the testing agency selected by the City under a separate contract. 5. Coordinate all testing with the City and Contractor for water, sewer and storm projects. 6. Coordinate final connections with the City and Contractor for water main projects. 7. Record and report the progress of the construction operations to the City throughout the duration of the contract. 8. Furnish the City with verification of all quantities of materials. 9. Provide final project inspection including punchlists. 10. Provide as-built redlines to supplement the Contractor’s redlines. 11. Monitor the Contractor’s traffic control operations to review compliance with City approved Traffic Control Plan. 12. Be responsive to requests from citizens and businesses. Deliverables (to be submitted weekly during construction):  Inspector’s Daily Reports.  Records of Force Account Work.  Weekly Tabulation of Quantities Placed (with all truck tickets attached).  Construction Progress Photos. It is anticipated that the City will:  Provide purity testing (with coordination provided by Inspector).  Review submittals and project schedules. Assumptions:  Projects include the remaining 2014 Water project plus the 2015 Water, 2015 Sanitary Sewer and 2015 Storm Drain projects.  The Contractor will provide construction staking for the projects.  The City or Design Engineering Firm will prepare as-built drawings based off of the as-built redlines.  Mileage associated with onsite construction inspection has been included in this task. Packet Page 129 of 344 Exhibit ‘A’ to the Contract Agreement for Professional Services between The Blueline Group, LLC and the City of Edmonds for Construction Services for 2015 Projects, dated February 6, 2015. Task 002 – CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES Fee: Time and Expense (Estimated $32,800) Blueline will provide construction administration services for this project during the construction period. Services under this task are anticipated to include: 1. Review plans and specifications and visit the site prior to the Pre-Construction Conference. 2. Attend Pre-Construction Conference. 3. Send out minutes from Pre-Construction Conference. 4. Review and approve Contractor progress schedules. 5. Review and approve contract pay estimates, and prepare pay requests for the City approval. 6. Prepare change orders, as needed. 7. Prepare and submit weekly reports (Statement of Working Days and Project Progress Chart). 8. Log affidavits/intents/certified payroll. 9. Provide project filing. 10. Provide RFI log. 11. Coordinate changes to drawings or specifications as necessary to respond to field conditions (As needed – coordinating with the City Project Manager). 12. Monitor construction to determine contractor compliance and prepare associated documentation. 13. General consultation and coordination on an as-needed basis to address construction questions. 14. Assist with preparing punch lists and final inspection. 15. Prepare recommendation of project acceptance. 16. Attend and conduct construction meetings as required. Provide meeting minutes to attendees. We assume at this point that a construction meeting will be held approximately every two weeks. 17. Additional construction inspection services and project management, as needed. Assumptions:  Projects include the remaining 2014 Water project plus the 2015 Water, 2015 Sanitary Sewer and 2015 Storm Drain projects.  The City or Design Engineering Firm will prepare as-built drawings based off of the as-built redlines.  The City will be reviewing submittals and maintaining the submittal log.  Mileage associated with construction administration has been included in this task.  If additional inspection time or project management is requested beyond the scope of Tasks 001 and 003, it will be billed under this task. Packet Page 130 of 344 Exhibit ‘A’ to the Contract Agreement for Professional Services between The Blueline Group, LLC and the City of Edmonds for Construction Services for 2015 Projects, dated February 6, 2015. Task 003 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT Fee: Time and Expense (Estimated $35,700) This task is for general coordination and meetings on the project, including: 1. Management of all tasks and staff for construction inspection services. 2. Communication with the City of Edmonds regarding the construction. 3. Budget tracking and providing weekly updates to the City. 4. Preparation of consultant monthly invoices for work performed during the previous month, including any pertinent backup materials. Assumptions:  Projects include the remaining 2014 Water project plus the 2015 Water, 2015 Sanitary Sewer and 2015 Storm Drain projects.  If additional inspection time or construction administration time is requested beyond the scope of Tasks 001 and 002, it will be billed under this task. GENERAL ASSUMPTIONS AND NOTES 1. Scope and fees outlined above are based on the following information (any changes to these documents may result in changes to the fees): a. Correspondence between the Blueline Group and the City of Edmonds on January 27, 2015, February 2, 2015, and February 6, 2015. 2. The client shall provide The Blueline Group with approved plans, contract documents, and any necessary inspection forms. 3. The fees stated above do not include reimbursable expenses such as large format copies (larger than letter/legal size), and plots. These items will be billed under a separate task called Expenses. 4. Compaction and materials testing will be billed directly to the City by the testing agency. 5. Time and expense items are based on The Blueline Group’s current hourly rates. Packet Page 131 of 344 At t a c h m e n t ‘ B ’ t o t h e C o n t r a c t A g r e e m e n t f o r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s be t w e e n t h e C i t y o f E d m o n d s a n d T h e B l u e l i n e G r o u p , L L C f o r Co n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s f o r 2 0 1 5 P r o j e c t s da t e d F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 1 5 Jo b N u m b e r : 1 5 - 0 2 6 Pr e p a r e d B y : D e a n n a M a r t i n , P E Da t e : Ch e c k e d B y : K e n L a u z e n , P E Ho u r s Ho u r s Ho u r s 00 1 0- $ 0 - $ 1 , 9 7 8 2 0 7 , 6 9 0 $ 17 , 0 0 0 1 , 9 7 8 2 2 4 , 6 9 0 $ 00 2 C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n S e r v i c e s 0- $ 2 0 5 2 9 , 1 1 0 $ 19 1, 9 9 5 $ 1 , 6 5 0 2 2 4 32,755 $ 00 3 P r o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t 22 6 3 5 , 7 0 8 $ 0 - $ 0 - $ 0 2 2 6 35,708 $ 22 6 3 5 , 7 0 8 $ 20 5 2 9 , 1 1 0 $ 1 , 9 9 7 2 0 9 , 6 8 5 $ 18 , 6 5 0 $ 2 , 4 2 8 2 9 3 , 1 5 3 $ To t a l C o s t ( R o u n d e d ) 293,200 $ To t a l Mi l e a g e Co n s t r u c t i o n Ad m i n i s t r a t o r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r To t a l Co n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t i o n S e r v i c e s Co n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r $1 0 5 / h r Ci t y o f E d m o n d s 2 0 1 5 C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s Fe b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 1 5 Ta s k Ta s k # Total Hours $1 4 2 / h r $1 5 8 / h r Total Cost Th e B l u e l i n e G r o u p Packet Page 132 of 344 At t a c h m e n t ‘ B ’ t o t h e C o n t r a c t A g r e e m e n t f o r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s be t w e e n t h e C i t y o f E d m o n d s a n d T h e B l u e l i n e G r o u p , L L C f o r Co n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s f o r 2 0 1 5 P r o j e c t s da t e d F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 1 5 00 1 A It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 10 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 4 0 . 0 4 , 2 0 0 $ 4 0 . 0 4 , 2 0 0 $ 2 P r o j e c t C l o s e - o u t , i n c l u d i n g p u n c h l i s t s , A s - b u i l t R e d l i n e s 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 8 . 0 8 4 0 $ 8 . 0 8 4 0 $ 3 500 $ To t a l 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 4 8 . 0 5 , 0 4 0 $ 4 8 . 0 5 , 5 4 0 $ 00 1 A 5 , 5 0 0 $ 00 1 B It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 10 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 1 6 . 0 1 , 6 8 0 $ 1 6 . 0 1 , 6 8 0 $ 20 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 6 5 0 . 0 6 8 , 2 5 0 $ 6 5 0 . 0 6 8 , 2 5 0 $ 3 P r o j e c t C l o s e - o u t , i n c l u d i n g p u n c h l i s t s , A s - b u i l t R e d l i n e s 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 1 6 . 0 1 , 6 8 0 $ 1 6 . 0 1 , 6 8 0 $ 4 6,500 $ To t a l 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 6 8 2 . 0 7 1 , 6 1 0 $ 6 8 2 . 0 7 8 , 1 1 0 $ *A s s u m e s 1 3 0 t o t a l w o r k i n g d a y s 00 1 B 7 8 , 1 0 0 $ 00 1 C It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 10 .0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 1 6 . 0 1 , 6 8 0 $ 16.0 1 , 6 8 0 $ 20 .0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 8 0 0 . 0 8 4 , 0 0 0 $ 800.0 8 4 , 0 0 0 $ 3 P r o j e c t C l o s e - o u t , i n c l u d i n g p u n c h l i s t s , A s - b u i l t R e d l i n e s 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 1 6 . 0 1 , 6 8 0 $ 16.0 1 , 6 8 0 $ 4 5,000 $ To t a l 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 8 3 2 . 0 8 7 , 3 6 0 $ 832.0 9 2 , 3 6 0 $ *A s s u m e s 1 0 0 t o t a l w o r k i n g d a y s 00 1 C 92,400 $ TOTAL FEE Co n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r TO T A L H R S Pa r t - t i m e f i e l d ( 2 w k s x 2 0 h r s / w k ) Co n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r Mi l e a g e ( 2 w k s x 2 5 0 m i / w k @ $ 1 / m i ) Ci t y o f E d m o n d s 2 0 1 5 C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r Co n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t i o n S e r v i c e s 20 1 4 W a t e r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r $1 0 5 / h r Co n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t i o n S e r v i c e s 20 1 5 W a t e r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n f e r e n c e & P r e p Pa r t - t i m e f i e l d ( 2 6 w k s x 2 5 h r s / w k ) * Mi l e a g e ( 2 6 w k s x 2 5 0 m i / w k @ $ 1 / m i ) Co n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t i o n S e r v i c e s 20 1 5 S a n i t a r y S e w e r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n f e r e n c e & P r e p Fu l l - t i m e f i e l d ( 2 0 w k s x 4 0 h r s / w k ) * Mi l e a g e ( 2 0 w k s x 2 5 0 m i / w k @ $ 1 / m i ) Th e B l u e l i n e G r o u p Packet Page 133 of 344 At t a c h m e n t ‘ B ’ t o t h e C o n t r a c t A g r e e m e n t f o r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s be t w e e n t h e C i t y o f E d m o n d s a n d T h e B l u e l i n e G r o u p , L L C f o r Co n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s f o r 2 0 1 5 P r o j e c t s da t e d F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 1 5 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s 2 0 1 5 C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s 00 1 D It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 10 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 8 . 0 8 4 0 $ 8 . 0 8 4 0 $ 20 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 4 0 0 . 0 4 2 , 0 0 0 $ 4 0 0 . 0 4 2 , 0 0 0 $ 3 P r o j e c t C l o s e - o u t , i n c l u d i n g p u n c h l i s t s , A s - b u i l t R e d l i n e s 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 8 . 0 8 4 0 $ 8 . 0 8 4 0 $ 4 5,000 $ To t a l 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 4 1 6 . 0 4 3 , 6 8 0 $ 4 1 6 . 0 4 8 , 6 8 0 $ *A s s u m e s 1 0 0 t o t a l w o r k i n g d a y s 00 1 D 4 8 , 7 0 0 $ 00 2 A It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 10 .0 - $ 2. 0 2 8 4 $ 0. 0 - $ 2.0 2 8 4 $ 2 P a y E s t i m a t e s & C h a n g e O r d e r s ( 1 e s t x 4 h r s ) 0. 0 - $ 4. 0 5 6 8 $ 0. 0 - $ 4.0 5 6 8 $ To t a l 0. 0 - $ 6. 0 8 5 2 $ 0. 0 - $ 6.0 8 5 2 $ 00 2 A 900 $ 00 2 B It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 10 .0 - $ 12 . 0 1 , 7 0 4 $ 0. 0 - $ 12.0 1 , 7 0 4 $ 20 .0 - $ 39 . 0 5 , 5 3 8 $ 0. 0 - $ 39.0 5 , 5 3 8 $ 3 P a y E s t i m a t e s & C h a n g e O r d e r s ( 7 m o x 4 h r s / m o ) 0. 0 - $ 28 . 0 3 , 9 7 6 $ 8. 0 8 4 0 $ 36.0 4 , 8 1 6 $ 4 650 $ To t a l 0. 0 - $ 79 . 0 1 1 , 2 1 8 $ 8. 0 8 4 0 $ 87.0 1 2 , 7 0 8 $ 00 2 B 12,700 $ TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE We e k l y A d m i n T a s k s ( 2 w k s x 1 h r s / w k ) Co n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n S e r v i c e s 20 1 5 W a t e r Co n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n S e r v i c e s 20 1 4 W a t e r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r Co n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t i o n S e r v i c e s 20 1 5 S t o r m D r a i n Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n f e r e n c e & P r e p Pa r t - t i m e f i e l d ( 2 0 w k s x 2 0 h r s / w k ) * Mi l e a g e ( 2 0 w k s x 2 5 0 m i / w k @ $ 1 / m i ) Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n f e r e n c e & P r e p We e k l y A d m i n T a s k s ( 2 6 w k s x 1 . 5 h r s / w k ) Mi l e a g e ( 1 3 w k s x 5 0 m i / w k @ $ 1 / m i ) Th e B l u e l i n e G r o u p Packet Page 134 of 344 At t a c h m e n t ‘ B ’ t o t h e C o n t r a c t A g r e e m e n t f o r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s be t w e e n t h e C i t y o f E d m o n d s a n d T h e B l u e l i n e G r o u p , L L C f o r Co n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s f o r 2 0 1 5 P r o j e c t s da t e d F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 1 5 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s 2 0 1 5 C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s 00 2 C It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 10 .0 - $ 12 . 0 1 , 7 0 4 $ 0. 0 - $ 12.0 1 , 7 0 4 $ 20 .0 - $ 30 . 0 4 , 2 6 0 $ 0. 0 - $ 30.0 4 , 2 6 0 $ 3 P a y E s t i m a t e s & C h a n g e O r d e r s ( 5 m o x 4 h r s / m o ) 0. 0 - $ 20 . 0 2 , 8 4 0 $ 5. 0 5 2 5 $ 25.0 3 , 3 6 5 $ 4 500 $ To t a l 0. 0 - $ 62 . 0 8 , 8 0 4 $ 5. 0 5 2 5 $ 67.0 9 , 8 2 9 $ 00 2 C 9,800 $ 00 2 D It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 10 .0 - $ 8. 0 1 , 1 3 6 $ 0. 0 - $ 8.0 1 , 1 3 6 $ 20 .0 - $ 30 . 0 4 , 2 6 0 $ 0. 0 - $ 30.0 4 , 2 6 0 $ 3 P a y E s t i m a t e s & C h a n g e O r d e r s ( 5 m o x 4 h r s / m o ) 0. 0 - $ 20 . 0 2 , 8 4 0 $ 6. 0 6 3 0 $ 26.0 3 , 4 7 0 $ 4 500 $ To t a l 0. 0 - $ 58 . 0 8 , 2 3 6 $ 6. 0 6 3 0 $ 64.0 9 , 3 6 6 $ 00 2 D 9,400 $ 00 3 A It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 1 R e m a i n i n g P M t a s k s 4. 0 6 3 2 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 4.0 6 3 2 $ To t a l 4. 0 6 3 2 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 4.0 6 3 2 $ 00 3 A 600 $ TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t 20 1 4 W a t e r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r Co n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n S e r v i c e s 20 1 5 S a n i t a r y S e w e r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n f e r e n c e & P r e p We e k l y A d m i n T a s k s ( 2 0 w k s x 1 . 5 h r s / w k ) Mi l e a g e ( 1 0 w k s x 5 0 m i / w k @ $ 1 / m i ) Co n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n S e r v i c e s 20 1 5 S t o r m D r a i n Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE Pr e - C o n s t r u c t i o n C o n f e r e n c e & P r e p We e k l y A d m i n T a s k s ( 2 0 w k s x 1 . 5 h r s / w k ) Mi l e a g e ( 1 0 w k s x 5 0 m i / w k @ $ 1 / m i ) Th e B l u e l i n e G r o u p Packet Page 135 of 344 At t a c h m e n t ‘ B ’ t o t h e C o n t r a c t A g r e e m e n t f o r P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s be t w e e n t h e C i t y o f E d m o n d s a n d T h e B l u e l i n e G r o u p , L L C f o r Co n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s f o r 2 0 1 5 P r o j e c t s da t e d F e b r u a r y 6 , 2 0 1 5 Ci t y o f E d m o n d s 2 0 1 5 C o n s t r u c t i o n S e r v i c e s 00 3 B It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 1 8 . 0 1 , 2 6 4 $ 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 8 . 0 1 , 2 6 4 $ 2 R e v i e w I D R s / d o c u m e n t a t i o n ( 2 6 w k s x 1 h r / w k ) 2 6 . 0 4 , 1 0 8 $ 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 2 6 . 0 4 , 1 0 8 $ 3 2 6 . 0 4 , 1 0 8 $ 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 2 6 . 0 4 , 1 0 8 $ 4 2 6 . 0 4 , 1 0 8 $ 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 2 6 . 0 4 , 1 0 8 $ To t a l 8 6 . 0 1 3 , 5 8 8 $ 0 . 0 - $ 0 . 0 - $ 8 6 . 0 1 3 , 5 8 8 $ 00 3 B 13,600 $ 00 3 C It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 1 8. 0 1 , 2 6 4 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 8.0 1 , 2 6 4 $ 2 R e v i e w I D R s / d o c u m e n t a t i o n ( 2 0 w k s x 1 h r s / w k ) 20 . 0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 20.0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 3 20 . 0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 20.0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 4 20 . 0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 20.0 3 , 1 6 0 $ To t a l 68 . 0 1 0 , 7 4 4 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 68.0 1 0 , 7 4 4 $ 00 3 C 10,700 $ 00 3 D It e m # HR S F E E H R S F E E H R S F E E 1 8. 0 1 , 2 6 4 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 8.0 1 , 2 6 4 $ 2 R e v i e w I D R s / d o c u m e n t a t i o n ( 2 0 w k s x 1 h r / w k ) 20 . 0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 20.0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 3 20 . 0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 20.0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 4 20 . 0 3 , 1 6 0 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 20.0 3 , 1 6 0 $ To t a l 68 . 0 1 0 , 7 4 4 $ 0. 0 - $ 0. 0 - $ 68.0 1 0 , 7 4 4 $ 00 3 D 10,700 $ Pr o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t 20 1 5 W a t e r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE In i t i a l P r o j e c t S e t u p , R e v i e w p l a n s / s p e c s Bu d g e t T r a c k i n g & I n v o i c i n g ( 2 6 w k s x 1 h r / w k ) Co o r d i n a t i o n w i t h S t a f f a n d C i t y ( 2 6 w k s x 1 h r / w k ) Pr o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t 20 1 5 S a n i t a r y S e w e r Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE In i t i a l P r o j e c t S e t u p , R e v i e w p l a n s / s p e c s Bu d g e t T r a c k i n g & I n v o i c i n g ( 2 0 w k s x 1 h r s / w k ) Co o r d i n a t i o n w i t h S t a f f a n d C i t y ( 2 0 w k s x 1 h r s / w k ) Pr o j e c t M a n a g e m e n t 20 1 5 S t o r m D r a i n Pr o j e c t M a n a g e r C o n s t r u c t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t o r C o n s t r u c t i o n I n s p e c t o r De s c r i p t i o n $1 5 8 / h r $1 4 2 / h r $1 0 5 / h r TO T A L H R S TOTAL FEE In i t i a l P r o j e c t S e t u p , R e v i e w p l a n s / s p e c s Bu d g e t T r a c k i n g & I n v o i c i n g ( 2 0 w k s x 1 h r / w k ) Co o r d i n a t i o n w i t h S t a f f a n d C i t y ( 2 0 w k s x 1 h r / w k ) Th e B l u e l i n e G r o u p Packet Page 136 of 344    AM-7482     5.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:15 Minutes   Submitted For:Phil Williams Submitted By:Jim Stevens Department:Public Works Type: Potential Action  Information Subject Title Public Hearing and Potential Action regarding the Naming of Fire Station #16. Recommendation Consider the results from the public hearing associated with this agenda item to determine if the Council wishes to memorialize this City building as proposed by citizens. Previous Council Action On June 17, 2014, Council approved the attached policy to guide decisions on naming City facilities.  On February 10, 2015, the Council moved this item forward to a regular meeting with a public hearing to determine the final action on naming Fire Station #16. Narrative Staff received direction from Council members earlier this year to work with citizen input and City policy guidelines in order for the Council to consider the naming of Fire Station #16 in honor of Betty Mueller.  This has been proposed by citizens to recognize her considerable work behind the levy that provided funding for its construction.  The City policy on naming facilities is the first attachment to this agenda item.  The citizen input that staff received is contained in the second, third, and fourth attachments to this agenda item. Last year staff did some preliminary investigative work on how memorial signage might work at this Fire Station.  In terms of the options explored, there are several choices that vary in cost and visibility to consider.  In general terms, they consist of reworking the existing monument signage on the street at a cost of approximately $1000, or reworking the existing bronze plaque or creating an entirely new one for essentially this same cost.  Two additional alternatives would consist of introducing new stainless steel lettering directly to the side of the building.  This could be done in 2” or 5” letters, depending on the location of the installation.  The costs would run between $1800 and $2750, based on the size chosen.  A photo of the existing monument signage on 196th St. is the fifth attachment.  The existing building bronze plaque is the sixth attachment, and a graphic representation showing how two lettering schemes might work (beneath the address numbers and beneath the station number) is the final attachment for this agenda item.  The current understanding is that any memorial signage authorized and chosen for this fire station would be funded through citizen contribution. Attachments Nmaing City Facilities Packet Page 137 of 344 Citizen Input on Naming Edmonds Enterprise Article Monument Sign Bronze Plaque Metal Letter Options Betty Mueller Information Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Public Works Phil Williams 02/13/2015 08:17 AM Parks and Recreation Carrie Hite 02/27/2015 08:47 AM City Clerk Scott Passey 02/27/2015 08:48 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/27/2015 08:50 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/27/2015 08:51 AM Form Started By: Jim Stevens Started On: 02/11/2015 10:15 AM Final Approval Date: 02/27/2015  Packet Page 138 of 344 City of Edmonds City policy related to the naming of City buildings and physical resources shall be administered by the City Clerk's Office. The City will choose names for public buildings and property owned by the City of Edmonds based on the building or property’s relationship to any of the following criteria: A. Neighborhood, geographic or common usage identification. B. Building or property’s purpose. C. A natural or geological feature. D. A historical figure or place. E. An individual, living or deceased, who has made a significant land, building, or monetary contribution to the &ity for the building or property being named. F. An individual, living or deceased, who has contributed outstanding civic service to the city and, if deceased, has been so for a period of at least one year. 12.62.020 Naming of City-owned Public Buildings and Properties – Procedure. A. Whenever the City Council wishes to consider naming a City-owned building or property, the issue shall be referred to the City Council’s 3DUNV3ODQQLQJ 3XEOLF:RUNV&RPPLWWHH to establish thespecific process and to make a recommendation(s) to the full Council. B. Before taking action, the City Council shall provide an opportunity for public comment on the recommendation(s) from the 3DUNV3ODQQLQJ 3XEOLF:RUNV&RPPLWWHH. 12.62.030 Naming of Interior Features. The interior features or spaces of a City-owned building may be named separately from the main building subject to the criteria and procedures set forth in this Chapter. 12.62.040 Name Changes. A. Designation of a name shall not prohibit the renaming of the building or property at a future date, or the designation of a sunset for the name at the time of approval. B. Name changes shall be subject to the criteria and procedures set forth in this Chapter. Packet Page 139 of 344 There is a movement to name Fire Station 16 after one of Edmonds's pioneer woman, Betty Mueller. I want you to know a little about Betty so you can be proud to have her name on your building. Betty is the number one person most responsible for your station and the entire city hall complex to have been built. Betty was also the one who got the fire foundation organized and off the ground. Betty and I were on Mayor Laura Hall's think tank in 1994 when Betty announced that the city buildings were old, dilapidated and out of code. She said the firehouse was so dangerous and cramped that getting down the pole during a fire call was more hazardous than going to the fire. It was cold in the winter and hot in the summer. 1994 was the first big El Nino with temps over 100 degrees upstairs where the firefighters tried to sleep. Betty proposed to the city council that we float a bond issue for the 10 million estimated costs. It was voted down 5 to 2. The prevailing attitude was that a bond issue would never pass. That's when Betty went to work. With the help of the community services director, Betty organized tours of the out of code buildings. She showed people in groups what the problems were and what it would take to fix it. After meeting with the council in May of 1994, they again showed reluctance. Undeterred Betty called Connie Chung of Channel 5 News and had a televised news conference in my office building at Edmonds Realty. That did it. We had to raise the $17,000 to put it on the ballot. Everybody chipped in. The firefighters collected money in boots and helped man phone banks to get the job done. In November of 1994 71% of the citizens voted yes. Up to then, that was the largest majority in history. Betty Mueller never minced words. She called a spade a spade regardless of what anyone else thought and some people got their feelings hurt. She was not invited to the groundbreaking nor was she invited to the ribbon cutting when it was finished. Let me tell you friends, she couldn't care less. She did what she did because it needed to be done. She started the fire foundation with another big supporter of firefighters, Mr. Chuck Cain. We should name one after him. In closing, Betty had a bulldog's strength in her convictions and she had moral fiber of steel. I have read about the greatness of Eleanor Packet Page 140 of 344 Roosevelt. She and Betty would have been great friends. Betty passed away recently, I think she was 93 or 94. She directed her family to keep it on the low down, private not public. Many of us didn't get a chance to say goodbye, I wish I could have because I loved her. Betty Mueller was one of a kind. The world could use more people like her. Betty Mueller was a great friend to firefighters. I hope you read this and wish you would have known her. Thank you for taking the time. If you all support the movement, please email Joan Bloom at Joan.bloom@edmondswa.gov. She is the chairperson for the Parks/Planning and Public Works. One email from the chief will suffice. David Page 1233 Olympic View Dr. Edmonds, WA 98020 Cell: 425-319-1234 Packet Page 141 of 344 P a c k e t P a g e 1 4 2 o f 3 4 4 Packet Page 143 of 344 Packet Page 144 of 344 Packet Page 145 of 344 Betty Mueller Before moving to Edmonds in 1949, Betty studied at Dance Masters of America to become a certified dance instructor. For many years she taught Dance classes for countless young girls and boys in Edmonds. Betty volunteered for many Edmonds related organizations including the 4th of July Parade and South Snohomish County Museum. During the early 1990s Betty found her true calling, as a community organizer. From this time period and well into her eighties, she made an immeasurable impact on this beautiful city on Puget Sound: Chairman of “Repeal of the EMS Transport Fee” initiative. Petition drive to ban casinos in Edmonds. Founder of Edmonds Police Foundation Founder of Edmonds Public Safety Foundation Founder ACE: Alliance of Citizens of Edmonds I believe that a fitting tribute to Betty Mueller’s tireless efforts to enhance the quality of life for the citizens of edmonds ,would be the naming of the 196th Street fire hall in her memory. Regards, Rich demeroutis Packet Page 146 of 344    AM-7529     6.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:5 Minutes   Submitted By:James Lawless Department:Police Department Type: Action  Information Subject Title Authorization to Sell City Asset Recommendation It is the request and recommendation of staff that Council authorize the sale of Police K9 Kira to the Everett Police Department. Previous Council Action N/A Narrative In July 2011, the Police Department purchased a German Shepard puppy (Kira), for $1,500, in order to replace a recently retired police K9, Rocky.  The purchase was made with funds that were raised and donated by the Edmonds Police Foundation, a non-profit organization that has been integral in assisting the police department with funding for their K9 program for well over 15 years.   Due to several staffing issues that currently exist, the department is unable to fill a vacant K9 handler position. The department will be leaving that specialty position vacant until such time as three officers currently in the academy graduate, and three additional vacant positions can be filled and those officers complete academy and field training.  Given that Kira is still relatively young and has at least 4-5 good "working" years left, the department reached out to other agencies in order to find a department with a K9 program that may be interested in purchasing Kira. The Everett Police Department has agreed to purchase Kira for $1,500 and they will be placing her with one of their K9 handlers.  While purchased with donated funds, Kira is still a City asset, therefore, Council Approval is required for that sale to take place.  Attached is a Purchase and Sale Agreement and a Hold Harmless Agreement that have been reviewed and approved as to form by both the Edmonds City Attorney's Office and the Everett City Attorney's Office. Attachments Hold Harmless Agreement Purchase and Sale Agreement Form Review Packet Page 147 of 344 Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 02/27/2015 07:00 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/27/2015 08:13 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/27/2015 08:14 AM Form Started By: James Lawless Started On: 02/26/2015 03:25 PM Final Approval Date: 02/27/2015  Packet Page 148 of 344 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT AND RELEASE FROM LIABILITY IN ACCEPTING transfer from the Edmonds Police Department of the following described canine, to wit Kira, a tan and black female, German Shepherd dog, date of birth 08/25/10, after the payment of $1,500.00 to the City of Edmonds, the City of Everett, recognizes that said animal has received training in police canine procedures and tactics, including, but not limited to, attack training and other forms of aggressive conduct, and by acceptance of this animal that is being sold by the Edmonds Police Department as one of its police canines, the City of Everett, for and in consideration of the transfer to the City of Everett of Kira, agrees as evidenced by signature hereto to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, the Edmonds Police Department and its employees and agents from any and all liability whatsoever including all costs and attorneys fees that might arise from any acts engaged in by the aforesaid canine after the Purchaser takes possession of the canine resulting from his training as herein described as well as any other acts of said canine after the Purchaser takes possession of the canine whether or not attributable to such training. The City of Everett furthermore agrees to waive any and all claims of liability insofar as the City of Edmonds, the Edmonds Police Department, its employees and agents are concerned that might arise as a result of the City of Everett’s use and/or possession of said animal. Moreover, it is understood by the undersigned that in consideration of this transfer, the Edmonds Police Department surrenders all responsibility and obligation for the condition of, care of and acts of said animal. By signing this instrument, the undersigned acknowledges the City of Everett’s full understanding of all of the language contained herein and specifically agrees to all of the terms of this document. CITY OF EVERETT WASHINGTON By: ____________________________ Ray Stephanson, Mayor ______________________________ Date Packet Page 149 of 344 ATTEST: Sharon Fuller, City Clerk Date: ______________ APPROVED AS TO FORM: James D. Iles, City Attorney Date: _______________ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH ) On this _____ day of __________, _______, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Ray Stephanson, to me known (or proved by satisfactory evidence) to be the Mayor of the City of Everett, the municipal corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said municipal corporation, for the purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written. ______________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at ___________________ My Commission expires __________________ Print name:_____________________________ Packet Page 150 of 344 1 PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the City of Edmonds Police Department (hereinafter “Seller”), and the City of Everett (hereinafter "Purchaser"). WHEREAS, the Seller desires to sell a trained K9 unit police dog to the Purchaser; and WHEREAS, the Purchaser desires to purchase the police dog from the Seller under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Property. The Seller has agreed to sell and the Purchaser has agreed to purchase the following described canine, to wit: Kira, a tan and black German Shepard, DOB 08/25/10. 2. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the canine described in paragraph 1 above shall be one thousand five hundres dollars ($1,500), which shall be paid by Purchaser to Seller by check immediately upon execution of this Agreement. 3. Warranties of the Seller. The Seller hereby warrants and represents to the Purchaser that the Seller owns the canine being conveyed herein, free and clear of any encumbrances, claims or contract rights; no approval or consent of any third person is required to effect the sale; and the execution and performance of this Agreement will not violate any agreements to which the Seller is a party or any federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations. 4. Hold Harmless Agreement. In purchasing the above-described canine from the Seller, the Purchaser recognizes that said animal has received training in police canine procedures and tactics, including, but not limited to, attack training and other forms of aggressive conduct. By acceptance of this canine, the Purchaser, for and in consideration of the transfer to the Purchaser of Kira, agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Seller, including the City of Edmonds, the Edmonds Police Department and its employees and agents, from any and all liability whatsoever, including all costs and attorneys fees that might arise from any acts engaged in by the aforesaid canine after Purchaser takes possession of the canine resulting from his/her training as herein described, as well as any other acts of said canine after Purchaser takes possession of the canine whether or not attributable to such training. The Purchaser furthermore agrees to waive any and all claims of liability insofar as the Seller, including the City of Edmonds, the Edmonds Police Department, its employees and agents, are concerned that might arise as a result of the Purchaser’s use and/or possession of said canine. Packet Page 151 of 344 2 Moreover, it is understood by the Purchaser that, in consideration of this transfer, the Seller surrenders all responsibility and obligation for the condition of, care of and acts of said animal. 5. Benefit. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their legal representatives, successors and assigns. 6. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. Any action to interpret or enforce this Agreement shall be brought before the Superior Court of Snohomish County, Washington, and the Parties agree that, as between them, all matters shall be resolved in that venue. 7. Invalid Provision. In the event any provision of this Agreement is held to be void, invalid or unenforceable in any respect, then the same shall not affect the remaining provisions hereof, which shall continue in full force and effect. 8. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties and may only be amended or modified in writing and with such writing being executed by both parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year last below written. CITY OF EDMONDS, SELLER CITY OF EVERETT, PURCHASER ____________________________ ____________________________ Dave Earling, Mayor Ray Stephanson, Mayor Date ________________________ Date ________________________ Packet Page 152 of 344    AM-7528     7.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:15 Minutes   Submitted By:Carrie Hite Department:Parks and Recreation Review Committee: Parks/Planning/Public Works Committee Action: Recommend Review by Full Council Type: Action  Information Subject Title City Park Award of Bid for Spray Pad and Authorizing Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement Recommendation Council approve award of bid to Aquatic Specialty Services for the Spray Pad at City Park. Council authorize Mayor to sign Supplemental Agreement with Site Workshop for additional services. Previous Council Action Council authorized expenditures and received grants for City Park Spray and Play revitalization. Council authorized a Professional Services Agreement with MacLeod Reckord for Architectural and Engineering services for the City Park revitalization project.  Council authorized the Mayor to sign an award of bid for the Play Equipment. Council authorized the Mayor to sign an award of bid for the Spray Equipment. Council terminated contracts with MacLeod Reckord and Aquatic Specialty Services Council awarded bid to Site Workshop to design the Spray pad portion of the project. Council approved updated project budget in December 2014 ( see attached) Narrative Since the last update to Council in December, and the approval of the project budget, the City issued an RFP for the spray pad equipment for City Park ( see attached) for $280,000.  We received two bids and scored them according to the criteria outlined in the bid document.  The bid tabulation is attached. As Council can see the winning bid came in under the $280,000 threshold.  This request is for Council to officially Award the bid to Aquatic Specialty Services for the provision of the Spray pad equipment, and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement for Equipment ( Attachment 4 and 5 to this memo). Also, in preparation for the construction permit and bid documents, the City has relied on Site Workshop to provide additional services.  These include the addition of design services for the pedestrian Packet Page 153 of 344 improvements into the park.  It also included Site Workshops preparation of separate bid documents for the Spray Pad equipment.   The pedestrian improvements were required by the SEPA that was issued, and something that is necessary for the project.  As a recommendation from our City transportation engineer, there will be lights added to the already existing crosswalk.  Site Workshop is in the process of designing this portion so it can be included in the construction bid documents.  The design services cost an additional $1800 and were included in the Council approved budget in December 2014. The bid documents that were prepared for the Spray equipment cost an additional $5,770, but saved the 20% markup to have it included in the general contractor's bid.  This was also in the approved budget in December.  This $5770 cost saved the City $55,000 because we didn't have to pay a general contactor a 20% fee to order and supply the equipment. This request is for the Council to authorize the Mayor to sign this supplemental agreement ( Attachments 6 and 7 to this memo). Attachments Spray Pad RFP Bid Tab Spray Equipment Aquatic Specialty Services Bid Aquatic Specialty Services Agreement Aquatic Specialty Services Attachment A Supplemental Agreement Attachment A and B Site Workshop Site Workshop Original Agreement Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 02/27/2015 08:58 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/27/2015 09:00 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/27/2015 09:03 AM Parks and Recreation Carrie Hite 02/27/2015 12:09 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 02/27/2015 12:09 PM Mayor Dave Earling 02/27/2015 12:13 PM Form Started By: Carrie Hite Started On: 02/26/2015 12:21 PM Final Approval Date: 02/27/2015  Packet Page 154 of 344 CITY OF EDMONDS 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98 020 Request for Bid Proposals City Park Water Spray Park The City of Edmonds is requesting bid proposals for the design and supply of equipment for the Spray Park at City Park, Edmonds, Washington 98020. INSTRUCTIONS & GUIDELINES Bid proposals will be received for the design and supply of equipment for the City Park Water Spray Park for the City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department: All bid proposals are based on the specifications included in this packet. 1. City of Edmonds will award the selection based on the guidelines below. 2. Bid proposals should be mailed or hand delivered to: City of Edmonds Carrie Hite 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 3. Bid proposals must be received by 9:00 a.m. on February 12, 2015, in order to be considered. 4. The spray park must match the Instructions and Guidelines in this bid. 5. Questions concerning the specifications should be directed to Carrie Hite in writing at carrie.hite@edmondswa.gov. 6. Area of Work City Park 600 3rd Avenue South Edmonds, WA Spray Park The City will purchase all features and equipment (as noted) for the spray park from the winner of this bid. Packet Page 155 of 344 We plan to bid the construction of the spray park with the overall park play area renovation project. The City will coordinate the delivery of the features and equipment, and the installation with the park general contractor. The Spray Park system will be installed by the project General Contractor. Basic Spraypark System Overview • Basis of Design is attached drawings and specifications – refer to mechanical drawings & specifications for specific requirements for products included in list below. Substitutions will be considered if the request does not require extensive revisions to existing design, changes are in keeping with the general intent of the existing design and meet or exceed level of quality represented by existing design, and the request is fully documented and properly submitted. • Owner will provide mechanical building to house equipment, pumps and controls as indicated in drawings. • System is single-loop, recirculating • System controls o Spray park control panel  Panel shall control spray park functions  Provide panel with outputs for control of pumps/VFD’s for all systems listed above.  Panel shall sequence recirculation & treatment system w/ autobackwash valves/functions, UV operation, etc. • Spray feature manifold o Manifold shall be mounted in mechanical building. o Provide quantity of feature valves shown on design drawings. o Each feature connection at the manifold shall be provided with unions, ball valve, and solenoid valve as shown on the design drawings. • Water treatment system o Water treatment system shall be mounted in mechanical building o UV water treatment unit o Solid chlorine system o (2) Sand filters for water treatment • Water storage tank o 5000-gallon tank (6’ diameter) • Rain diverter (with integral strainer basket) • Water features for spray pad (ground sprays and vertical features) o Spray pad layout, flow rates, and feature selection shall be as shown on design drawings. • (2) Activators for spray pad What to submit with this Bid • Color presentation board (24” x 36” max) should include but not limited to: • Attachment A: Complete manufacturer’s parts specifications; • Attachment B: Layout drawing to scale of the proposed water spray park features (including overspray zones) and equipment Packet Page 156 of 344 • Detailed list of all components used in system. • Product cut-sheets for all components used in system (filters, UV, valves, controllers, water features, etc.). Cut-sheets showing multiple sizes or products shall indicate which sizes are being provided with system. • Cost separated into the following categories (excluding tax): • Water features, as shown on water feature schedule • Winterization plates for removable features • Activators, 2x post-type as shown on schedule • Water filtration system including UV, filters, chemistry control components, flowmeters, etc. • Support assembly for UV treatment chamber & water feature manifold as shown on design documents (detail 1, sheet M4.00) • Main loop circulation pump & VFD • Water storage tank • Diverter • Spray feature control panel & control components • Engineering support and start-up for the system (to be provided to installing contractor) • Shipping costs and delivery schedule from time of order placement. • Training for parks staff on maintenance and operating systems (to be provided once systems are installed). • Provide a detailed schedule for procurement and delivery based on estimated contract completion date of February 25, 2015. • List of (3) three project references in Washington State for work completed within the past 7 years, for a similar water park system. • Contact information for local technical support representative and brief narrative describing technical support process. The Bidder on this Proposal is NOT Responsible for the Following • Design or engineering of any mechanical, electrical, water service system needed to supply the water spray park. • Hardscape features including but not limited to spraypad pavement, adjacent walls, columns or stairs. • Design or engineering of other site work or general contractors work not related to the water spray park. • Installation of any components. This bid is intended to be for the pre-purchase of products only. Water Spray Park Bids Maximum expenditure for all costs related to this proposal is $280,000 excluding tax. Packet Page 157 of 344 The City of Edmonds will select the preferred company by February 6, 2015. Features and equipment will be purchased directly by the City of Edmonds in early March 2015. Coordination with our Mechanical Engineer and Landscape Architect may be required after this selection process in order to complete construction documents. Additional Comments Items quoted shall be F.O.B. Edmonds, Washington 98020. City of Edmonds reserves the right to make any minor deviations which could be considered beneficial to the City. WATER SPRAY PARK SELECTION City of Edmonds will award the contract /purchase to the best proposal according to their best judgment. The City reserves the right to reject any or all quotes for cause and to waive any formalities. The evaluation matrix is as follows: • Cost 30 points • Product Quality 30 points • References 20 points • Schedule 10 points • Local Support 10 points Planned Schedule RFP advertised January 28, 2015 Proposals due 9:00 AM February 12, 2015 Award/ Proposal selection February 18, 2015 City Council final approval February 24, 2015 Complete contract February 25-March 1, 2015 Bid construction project February 2015 Finalize order Early March, 2015 Completed construction June 2015 Packet Page 158 of 344 Bid Scoring: Spray Play: City Park February 12, 2015 Renee Rich Carrie Henry Total Vortex Ranking Score 80 65 80 76 301 Waterplay (Aquatic Specialty Services) Ranking Score 95 90 95 96 376 Notes: Vortex • Color scheme a bit too busy • Layout looks tight • Appears that spray zones aren’t met • Not organized in proposal • Lacking contact information for references • Didn’t provide complete information in proposal • Difficult to find some information in proposal i.e., gallons big bucket holds • Plans call for a 5,000 gallon tank; proposal lists 6,000, but cut sheet has 2,000, 3,000 and 4,000. Had to find dimensions outside of proposal. • No warranty information in proposal • Pricing under maximum expenditure Waterplay (Aquatic Specialty Services) • Good local support • Provided complete contact information for references • Easy to locate information in proposal • Willing to work with schedule • Pricing under maximum expenditure Packet Page 159 of 344 Packet Page 160 of 344 Packet Page 161 of 344 Packet Page 162 of 344 Packet Page 163 of 344 Packet Page 164 of 344 Packet Page 165 of 344 Packet Page 166 of 344 Packet Page 167 of 344 Packet Page 168 of 344 Packet Page 169 of 344 Packet Page 170 of 344 Packet Page 171 of 344 Packet Page 172 of 344 Packet Page 173 of 344 Packet Page 174 of 344 Packet Page 175 of 344 Packet Page 176 of 344 Packet Page 177 of 344 Packet Page 178 of 344 Packet Page 179 of 344 Packet Page 180 of 344 Packet Page 181 of 344 Packet Page 182 of 344 Packet Page 183 of 344 Packet Page 184 of 344 Packet Page 185 of 344 Packet Page 186 of 344 Packet Page 187 of 344 Packet Page 188 of 344 Packet Page 189 of 344 Packet Page 190 of 344 Packet Page 191 of 344 Packet Page 192 of 344 Packet Page 193 of 344 Packet Page 194 of 344 Packet Page 195 of 344 Packet Page 196 of 344 Packet Page 197 of 344 Packet Page 198 of 344 Packet Page 199 of 344 Packet Page 200 of 344 Packet Page 201 of 344 Packet Page 202 of 344 Packet Page 203 of 344 Packet Page 204 of 344 Packet Page 205 of 344 Packet Page 206 of 344 Packet Page 207 of 344 Packet Page 208 of 344 Packet Page 209 of 344 Packet Page 210 of 344 Packet Page 211 of 344 Packet Page 212 of 344 Packet Page 213 of 344 Packet Page 214 of 344 Packet Page 215 of 344 Packet Page 216 of 344 Packet Page 217 of 344 Packet Page 218 of 344 Packet Page 219 of 344 GOODS & MATERIALS AGREEMENT between the CITY OF EDMONDS and AQUATIC SPECIALTY SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made by and between the City of Edmonds, a Washington municipal corporation (the "City"), and Aquatic Specialty Services, located and doing business at 1605 South 93rd Street, Seattle, WA 98108, telephone number (206) 275-0694 (the "Vendor") as a procurement contract for goods and materials. AGREEMENT 1. DESCRIPTION OF WORK. The Vendor shall provide the goods and materials set forth in its bid proposal letter to the City, dated February 11, 2015, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. TIME OF COMPLETION. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, the Vendor shall provide all goods and materials within sixty (60) days of order. Time is of the essence for this Agreement. The delivery date shall be mutually agreed upon. 3. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Vendor an amount not to exceed Three Hundred One Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Six Dollars and Fourteen Cents ($301,936.14), applicable Washington State Tax inclusive, for the goods and materials included in this Agreement. The City shall pay the Vendor the full amount within 30 days of receipt of all merchandise listed in Attachment A when received in good condition. If the City objects to all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify the Vendor and reserves the option to only pay that portion of the invoice not in dispute. In that event, the parties will immediately make every effort to settle the disputed portion. Defective Goods. The Vendor guarantees the City that the goods and materials shall be free of any and all defects in the workmanship and materials. The City reserves its right to withhold payment from the Vendor for any defective or unauthorized goods or materials. Final Payment: Waiver of Claims. VENDOR’S ACCEPTANCE OF FINAL PAYMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF CLAIMS, EXCEPT THOSE PREVIOUSLY AND PROPERLY MADE AND IDENTIFIED BY VENDOR AS UNSETTLED AT THE TIME REQUEST FOR FINAL PAYMENT IS MADE. 4. WARRANTY. This Agreement is subject to all warranty provisions established under the Uniform Commercial Code, Title 62A, Revised Code of Washington. The Vendor warrants that the goods and materials to be provided pursuant to this Agreement are merchantable, are fit for the particular purpose for which they were obtained, and will perform in accordance with their specifications and the Vendor’ representations to the City. The Vendor shall correct all defects in workmanship and materials within one (1) year from the date of the Packet Page 220 of 344 City’s acceptance of the goods or materials. In the event any part of the goods or materials are repaired, only original replacement parts shall be used—rebuilt or used parts will not be acceptable. When defects are corrected, the warranty for that portion of the work shall extend for one (1) year from the date such correction is completed and accepted by the City. The Vendor shall begin to correct any defects within seven (7) calendar days of the receipt of notice from the City of the defect. If the Vendor does not accomplish the corrections within a reasonable time as determined by the City, the City may complete the corrections and the Vendor shall pay all costs incurred by the City in order to accomplish the correction. 5. INDEMNIFICATION. The Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including all legal costs and attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the Vendor’s performance of this Agreement, except for that portion of the injuries and damages caused by the City's sole negligence. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 6. INSURANCE. The Vendor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the provision of goods or materials to the City. A. No Limitation. The Vendor’s maintenance of insurance as required by the Agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Vendor to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City’s recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. B. Minimum Scope of Insurance. The Vendor shall obtain insurance of the types described below: Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover products liability. The City shall be named as an insured under the Vendor’ Commercial General Liability insurance policy using ISO Additional Insured-Vendor Endorsement CG 20 15 or a substitute endorsement providing equivalent coverage. C. Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Vendor shall maintain the following insurance limits: Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and a $2,000,000 product liability aggregate limit. D. Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Commercial General Liability insurance: i. The Vendor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained Packet Page 221 of 344 by the City shall be excess of the Vendor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. ii. The Vendor’s insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. E. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. F. Verification of Coverage. The Vendor shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Vendor before goods or materials will be accepted by the City. 7. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Non-Waiver of Breach. The failure of the City to insist upon strict performance of any of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, or to exercise any option conferred by this Agreement in one or more instances shall not be construed to be a waiver or relinquishment of those covenants, agreements or options, and the same shall be and remain in full force and effect. B. Resolution of Disputes and Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. If the parties are unable to settle any dispute, difference or claim arising from the parties’ performance of this Agreement, the exclusive means of resolving that dispute, difference or claim, shall only be by filing suit exclusively under the venue, rules and jurisdiction of the Snohomish County Superior Court, Snohomish County, Washington, unless the parties agree in writing to an alternative dispute resolution process. In any claim or lawsuit for damages arising from the parties' performance of this Agreement, each party shall pay all its legal costs and attorney's fees incurred in defending or bringing such claim or lawsuit, including all appeals, in addition to any other recovery or award provided by law; provided, however, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to limit the City's right to indemnification under Section 4 of this Agreement. C. Written Notice. All communications regarding this Agreement shall be sent to the parties at the addresses listed on the signature page of the Agreement, unless notified to the contrary. Any written notice hereunder shall become effective three (3) business days after the date of mailing by registered or certified mail, and shall be deemed sufficiently given if sent to the addressee at the address stated in this Agreement or such other address as may be hereafter specified in writing. D. Assignment. Any assignment of this Agreement by either party without the written consent of the non-assigning party shall be void. If the non-assigning party gives its consent to any assignment, the terms of this Agreement shall continue in full Packet Page 222 of 344 force and effect and no further assignment shall be made without additional written consent. E. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the City and Vendor. F. Entire Agreement. The written provisions and terms of this Agreement, together with any Exhibits attached hereto, shall supersede all prior verbal statements of any officer or other representative of the City, and such statements shall not be effective or be construed as entering into or forming a part of or altering in any manner this Agreement. All of the above documents are hereby made a part of this Agreement. However, should any language in any of the Exhibits to this Agreement conflict with any language contained in this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. G. Compliance with Laws. The Vendor agrees to comply with all federal, state, and municipal laws, rules, and regulations that are now effective or in the future become applicable to Vendor’s business, equipment, and personnel engaged in the provision of goods or materials as set forth in this Agreement or accruing out of the provision of those goods or materials. IN WITNESS, the parties below execute this Agreement, which shall become effective on the last date entered below. AQUATIC SPECIALTY SERVICES: By: Print Name: Its DATE: CITY OF EDMONDS: By: Print Name: David O. Earling Its Mayor DATE: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: VENDOR: NOTICES TO BE SENT TO: CITY: City Clerk, City of Edmonds 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 Packet Page 223 of 344 ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney AQUATIC SPECIALTY SERVICES: (PLACE CORPORATE SEAL HERE) By Title STATE OF ) ) ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2015 before me personally appeared known to be the (president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, or other authorized officer or agent, as the case may be) of the corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and upon oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed hereto is the corporate seal of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Packet Page 224 of 344 Attachment A Packet Page 225 of 344 Packet Page 226 of 344 Packet Page 227 of 344 Packet Page 228 of 344 Packet Page 229 of 344 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT City Park Revitalization WHEREAS, the City of Edmonds, Washington, hereinafter referred to as the “City”, and Site Workshop, hereinafter referred to as the “Consultant”, entered into an underlying agreement for professional services and assistance of a consulting firm to provide landscape design services with respect to the revitalization of City Park in July 2014; and WHEREAS, additional tasks to the original Scope of Work have been identified; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and between the parties thereto as follows: 1. The underlying Agreement of July 2014 between the parties, which is incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein (“Underlying Agreement”), is amended in, but only in, the following respects: 1.1 Scope of Work. The Scope of Work set forth in the Underlying Agreement shall be amended to include the additional services and material necessary to accomplish the stated objectives as outlined in the attached Exhibit A, incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein. 1.2 Contract Amount. The $115,000 amount set forth in section 2.A of the Underlying Agreement, and stated as an amount which shall not be exceeded, is hereby amended to include an additional not to exceed amount of $7,570 for the additional scope of work identified in Exhibit A to this supplemental agreement. As a result of this supplemental agreement, the contract amount is increased to a new total not-to-exceed amount of $122,570. 1.3 Exhibit B. Exhibit B to the Underlying Agreement, consisting of the rate and cost reimbursement schedule, is hereby amended to include the form set forth in the attached Exhibit B, incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein. 2. In all other respects, the Underlying Agreement between the parties shall remain in full force and effect, amended as set forth herein, but only as set forth herein. Packet Page 230 of 344 DATED this day of , 2015. CITY OF EDMONDS SITE WORKSHOP By: By: David O. Earling Mayor Title: ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Scott Passey, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2015, before me, the under-signed, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared , to me known to be the of the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Packet Page 231 of 344 WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Packet Page 232 of 344 SiteWorkshop LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 222 Etruria Street Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98109 T: 206 285 3026 F: 206 285 3629 www.siteworkshop.net February 26, 2015 Carrie Hite Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Services Director City of Edmonds 700 Main Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Contract Amendment #1 City Park Spraypark Project Dear Carrie: This is a request for additional services based on your request to modify project scope for City Park Spraypark. The first task involves adding plan/detail information to the Bid Documents to reflect pedestrian safety signage required by SEPA DNS . The second task involves bid support and revisions to documentation based on Owner procurement of spraypark equipment. To address these modifications, both Site Workshop and our sub- consultant team have extended our scope beyond that of the existing Construction Documents services and are proposing the following additional services: Task A Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Site Workshop Fee $0 LPD Engineering (includes 10% markup) $1,800 Total: $1,800 Task B Spraypark Equipment Bid Support Site Workshop Fee $3,120 Enginuity Engineering (includes 10% markup) $2,650 Total: $5,770 Total Proposed Additional Fee: $7,570 Please contact me or Mark Brands if you have any questions or comments regarding this amendment proposal. Sincerely, Brian Bishop Site Workshop Attachment A Packet Page 233 of 344 2/26/2015 Ci t y P a r k S p r a y p a r k - A m e n d m e n t # 1 - P e d e s t r i a n C r o s s i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s / S p r a y p a r k E q u i p B i d S u p p o r t SI T E W O R K S H O P T E A M Po s i t i o n : PM / L A C i v i l M e c h El e c t Na m e : Br i a n B i s h o p L P D En g i n u i t y G e r b e r Ra t e : $ 1 2 0 To t a l F e e s / T a s k No t e s BA S I C S E R V I C E S Ta s k A - P e d e s t r i a n C r o s s i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s Re v i s e D r a w i n g s / S p e c s Ap p l i e s o n l y t o r e q u i r e d s i g n a g e ; C r o s s w a l k an d c u r b b u l b r e v i s i o n s a r e e x c l u d e d . TO T A L H O U R S 0 0 SU B T O T A L $0 $ 1 , 8 0 0 $1 , 8 0 0 Ta s k B - S p r a y p a r k E q u i p B i d S u p p o r t De v e l o p R F P 4 Pr e p a r e B i d D o c u m e n t s f o r R F P 4 Re s p o n d t o V e n d o r Q u e s t i o n s 4 Re v i e w B i d s / S e l e c t i o n P r o c e s s 10 Up d a t e C D s t o r e f l e c t O w n e r P r o v i s i o n 4 TO T A L H O U R S 2 6 26 SU B T O T A L $ 3 , 1 2 0 $ 2 , 6 5 0 $ 5 , 7 7 0 TO T A L A S R $7 , 5 7 0 At t a c h m e n t B Packet Page 234 of 344 Packet Page 235 of 344 Packet Page 236 of 344 Packet Page 237 of 344 Packet Page 238 of 344 Packet Page 239 of 344 Packet Page 240 of 344 Packet Page 241 of 344 Packet Page 242 of 344 Packet Page 243 of 344 Packet Page 244 of 344 Packet Page 245 of 344    AM-7519     8.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:30 Minutes   Submitted For:Bertrand Hauss Submitted By:Megan Luttrell Department:Engineering Type: Information  Information Subject Title Presentation of Proposed Goals & Policies of the 2015 Transportation Element Plan Recommendation Provide comments on the Proposed Goals & Policies. Previous Council Action None. Narrative The City is currently working with the engineering firm of Fehr and Peers on updating the Transportation Plan. The project began in October 2014 and is scheduled for completion in June 2015. The plan will identify various improvements that will lead to the development of an integrated multimodal transportation system, that facilitates the safe and efficient movement of people while addressing current and future transportation demand as well as land use. The last Transportation Plan was completed in 2009.   The City’s 2009 Transportation Plan included 19 goals, 22 objectives, and 132 policies organized by eight major categories. While the document includes a number of policies aimed at smart planning, the length and structure of the document makes it difficult for daily use by City staff. As a part of the 2015 Transportation Plan, the consultant is updating the Goals and Policies section (Chapter 2 of the Plan) to create a more user-friendly structure and also ensure that the final version meets the requirements of Vision 2040.  At the February 11, 2015 Planning Board meeting, the Board provided comments on the City’s transportation related Goals & Policies. The Transportation Committee was also involved in reviewing this document at their January 2015 monthly meeting. Planning Board and Transportation Committee comments have been incorporated in this updated version of Goals & Policies. The purpose of this presentation is to obtain additional feedback from City Council. Attachments Proposed Goals & Policies Presentation Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date Packet Page 246 of 344 Inbox Reviewed By Date Engineering (Originator)Megan Luttrell 02/25/2015 03:07 PM Public Works Phil Williams 02/25/2015 04:06 PM City Clerk Scott Passey 02/26/2015 08:04 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/26/2015 10:27 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/27/2015 07:00 AM Form Started By: Megan Luttrell Started On: 02/25/2015 07:47 AM Final Approval Date: 02/27/2015  Packet Page 247 of 344 PROPOSED GOALS AND POLICIES Assessments of existing and future conditions, as well as development of the Transportation Plan, are guided by transportation goals and policies developed by the City. Major updates of the goals and policies take place during updates of the Transportation Element, under the direction of the Citizen Advisory and Technical Advisory Committees. Goals are generalized statements which broadly relate the physical environment to values. Under each goal, Policies are listed that provide specific direction for meeting the goals. Conflict will occasionally arise between a transportation policy and real-world constraints. The conflict will be resolved using the best judgment of the City Council, as advised by City staff and the Citizen Advisory Transportation Committee. GOALS In 2011, the City of Edmonds adopted a Complete Streets Ordinance, which pledges that the City will plan, design, and implement transportation projects, accommodating bicycles, pedestrians, and transit riders. This Transportation Element has six overarching goals that work together to achieve this vision of providing a transportation system that accommodates all users: • Provide a safe and user-friendly travel experience for all users. • Build a transportation system that enhances the City’s land use vision. • Be sustainable, financially, environmentally, and socially. • Foster an active and healthy community. • Create a complete and connected system that offers efficient transportation options. • Partner with other entities to create a logical system that integrates within the regional transportation network. Each of these goals is described in more detail below, and include specific policies to achieve individual goals. Packet Page 248 of 344 GOAL 1: PROVIDE A SAFE AND COMFORTABLE TRAVEL EXPERIENCE FOR ALL USERS. Policy X (3.5) Design new streets and, when the opportunity arises, redesign streets to a standard that reduces lane width to accommodate vehicles that use the street most frequently; rather than large vehicles that may use the street only occasionally. Policy X (3.6) Relate required street widths to the function and operating standards for the street. Policy X (3.11) Design street improvements to enhance the safe and efficient movement of pedestrians and bicycle traffic. Incorporate traffic calming measures where appropriate. Policy X (6.2) Design walking paths for use by people at all mobility levels. Improvements to walking paths and curb cuts should meet the requirements of the ADA. Policy X (6.6) Place highest priority on provision of lighting on walking paths, crosswalks and bicycle facilities that regularly carry non-motorized traffic at night. Non-motorized traffic includes motorized bicycles, scooters, and segways, in addition to pedestrians and people riding bicycles. Policy X (8.1) Seek opportunities to improve safety for those who bicycle in the city. Policy X (new) Coordinate planning, construction, and operation of transportation facilities and programs with the State, Counties, neighboring cities, Puget Sound Regional Council, Community Transit, Sound Transit, and other entities to ensure critical infrastructure is in place to respond to both natural and human-caused disasters. Packet Page 249 of 344 GOAL 2: BUILD A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT ENHANCES THE CITY’S LAND USE VISION. Policy X (1.1) Locate and design transportation facilities to meet the demands of existing and projected land uses as provided for in the Comprehensive Plan. Policy X new Work with transit agencies to ensure existing and planned transit creates connections to existing and future employment and activity centers. Policy X (1.2) Locate and design transportation facility improvements to respect the community’s residential character, natural features, and quality of life. Policy X (3.1) Design local residential streets to prevent or discourage use as shortcuts for vehicle through-traffic. Coordinate local traffic control measures with the affected neighborhood. Policy X (3.13) Design street improvements to encourage downtown traffic circulation to flow in and around commercial blocks, promoting customer convenience and reducing congestion. Separate through-traffic from local traffic circulation to encourage and support customer access. Policy X (3.14) Carefully review parking requirements for downtown development proposals both for autos and bikes to promote development while still ensuring adequate balance between parking supply and demand. Policy X (3.16) Encourage underground parking as part of new development. Policy X (6.19) Provide a complete walking path network in commercial areas, especially downtown, as an element of public open space that supports pedestrian and commercial activity. Policy X (15.6) Reassess the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) annually to ensure that transportation facility needs, financing, and levels of service are consistent with the City’s land use plan. The annual update should be coordinated with the annual budget process, and the annual amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy X (16.1) Ensure city transportation facilities and services are provided concurrent with new development or redevelopment to mitigate impacts created from such development. Road improvements may be funded with impact fees, and provided at the time of or within 10 years of development. Packet Page 250 of 344 Policy X (18.3) Encourage neighborhoods to fund improvements that exceed City standards (e.g. for parking, median strips, landscaping, traffic calming, walking paths or other locally- determined projects). Policy X (new) Guide the development of new streets and maintenance of existing streets to form a well-connected network that provides for safe, direct, and convenient access to the existing roadway network for automobiles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Prioritize transportation investments that reinforce the City’s vision of developing a compact, pedestrian and transit-oriented center. Packet Page 251 of 344 GOAL 3: BE SUSTAINABLE, FINANCIALLY, ENVIRONMENTALLY, AND SOCIALLY. Policy X (1.3) Minimize the adverse impact of transportation facility improvements on the natural environment both in established neighborhoods and undeveloped areas. Policy X (2.1) Design streets with the minimum pavement areas needed and utilized innovative materials were feasible, to reduce impervious surfaces. Policy X (3.7) Include analyses of geological, topographical, and hydrological conditions in street design. Policy X (3.8) Encourage landscaping along residential streets to preserve existing trees and vegetation, increase open spaces, and decrease impervious surfaces. Landscaping may be utilized to provide visual and physical barriers but should be carefully designed not to interfere with motorists’ sight distance and traffic, pedestrian, bicycle, and wheel chair safety. Landscaping improvements should take maintenance requirements into consideration. Policy X (3.9) Encourage underground placements of utilities when existing roadways are improved. Policy X (3.10) Encourage placement of underground conduit for future installation of fiber optic cable for new roadways and as roadways are improved. Policy X (5.4) Convert private streets to public streets only when: • The City Council has determined that a public benefit would result. • The street has been improved to the appropriate City public street standard. • The City Engineer has determined that conversion will have minimal effect on the City’s street maintenance budget. • In the case that the conversion is initiated by the owner(s) of the road, that the owner(s) finance the survey and legal work required for the conversion. Policy X (6.4) Construct walking paths in an ecologically friendly manner, encouraging the use of pervious paving materials where feasible. Policy X (16.2) Maximize efficiencies of existing transportation facilities through: • Transportation Demand Management Packet Page 252 of 344 • Encouraging development to use existing facilities • Technologies that improve the efficiency of travel, including signal improvements and changeable message signs. Policy X (18.1) Base the financing plan for transportation facilities on estimates of local revenues and external revenues that are reasonably anticipated to be received by the City. Policy X (18.2) Finance the six-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) within the City's financial capacity to achieve a balance between available revenue and expenditures related to transportation facilities. If projected funding is inadequate to finance needed transportation facilities, based on adopted LOS standards and forecasted growth, the City should explore one or more of the following options: • Lower the LOS standard • Change the Land Use Plan • Increase the amount of revenue from existing sources • Adopt new sources of revenue Policy X (18.4) Seek funding to complete multimodal solutions to transportation needs. Policy X (19.3) Ensure that ongoing operating and maintenance costs associated with a transportation facility are financially feasible prior to constructing the facility. Policy X (20.2) Ensure that future development pays a proportionate share of the cost to mitigate impacts associated with growth. Future development's payments may take the form of impact fees, SEPA mitigation payments, dedications of land, provision of transportation facilities, or special assessments. Policy X (23.1) Strive to conform to the Federal and State Clean Air Acts by working to help implement PSRC’s Vision 2040 and by following the requirements of Chapter 173-420 of the WAC. Policy X (23.2) Support transportation investments that advance alternatives to driving alone, as a measure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and in turn reduce the effect of citywide transportation on global climate change. New potential policies based on Planning Board feedback: Packet Page 253 of 344 Maintenance/Good state of repair policy: Keep roadways operating in safe condition by taking steps to secure roadway funding from a variety of sources to maintain, rehabilitate, or replace roadways. Edmonds will work with its partners to understand street maintenance and rehabilitation needs. Prioritize roadway preservation projects and consider the long term maintenance costs of new capacity as part of the up-front cost of development. Easements for pedestrian connections and protect natural environment: Where possible, preserve easements that provide pedestrian connections and protect the natural environment. Social equity policy Support the transportation needs of traditionally underserved neighborhoods and vulnerable populations through investment in equitable modes of transportation, in addition to potential catch-up investment for areas in need as necessary. Packet Page 254 of 344 GOAL 4: FOSTER AN ACTIVE AND HEALTHY COMMUNITY. Policy X (2.2) Encourage active transportation by providing safe facilities for bicycle and pedestrians. Policy X (4.3) Leverage funding opportunities and the City’s right of way to complete the arterial walking path system according to the following priority list: • Arterial roadways without walking paths or shoulders on which transit service is provided; • Arterial roadways without walking paths or shoulders on which transit service is not provided; • Arterial roadways with shoulders too narrow or in or poor walking condition for pedestrians; • Arterial roadways with adequate shoulders for pedestrians but without walking paths; and • The remainder of the arterial roadway system (e.g. roads with walking paths along one side, or roads with walking paths in disrepair). Policy X (?) As funding permits and right of way is available, complete collector walking path system according to the following priority list: • Collector roadways without walking paths or shoulders (or with narrow shoulders) on which transit service is provided; and • Collector roadways without walking paths that are adjacent to retail, schools, bus stops or parks. Policy X (5.3) When appropriate, acquire easements and/or development rights in lieu of rights-of- way for installation of smaller facilities such as sidewalks, walking paths, and bikeways. Policy X (6.5) Locate utilities and walking path amenities, including but not limited to poles, benches, planters, trashcans, bike racks, and awnings, so as to not obstruct non- motorized traffic or transit access. Policy X (6.7) Locate walking paths and bicycle facilities to facilitate community access to parks, schools, neighborhoods, shopping centers and transit facilities/stops. Packet Page 255 of 344 Policy X (6.11) Place highest priority on pedestrian safety in areas frequented by children, such as near schools, parks, and playgrounds. Provide walking paths in these areas at every opportunity. Policy X (6.10) Maintain existing public walking paths. Policy X (6.12) Periodically review and update walking path construction priorities in the Transportation Plan. Policy X (6.16) Encourage the use of innovative crosswalk treatments, such as pedestrian actuated flashing signals or pedestrian crossing flags. Policy X (6.17) Encourage collaboration across departments to develop a network of walking paths throughout the city. This network could include but not be limited to signed loop trails in neighborhoods, park-to-park walking paths, and theme-related walks. Policy X (6.18) Encourage separation of walking paths from bikeways, where feasible or multi-use paths. Policy X (8.2) Place highest priority for improvements to bicycle facilities and installation of bike racks and lockers near schools, commercial districts, multi-family residences, recreation areas, and transit facilities. Policy X (8.4) Provide bicycle lanes where feasible, to encourage the use of bicycles for transportation and recreation purposes. Sharrows can be provided on lower volume roadways to create motorist awareness. Policy X (8.5) Identify bicycle routes through signage. Policy X (8.7) Ensure that existing public bicycle facilities are maintained and upgraded when feasible. New potential policy based on Planning Board feedback: Transit node policy Prioritize connectivity to transit nodes that provide important connections to regional destinations. Packet Page 256 of 344 GOAL 5: CREATE A COMPLETE AND CONNECTED SYSTEM THAT OFFERS EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS Policy X (2.4) Design all streets as complete streets that serve automobile, transit, pedestrian and bicycle travel according to City ordinance 3842, where feasible. Policy X (3.2) Periodically review functional classifications of city streets and adjust the classifications when appropriate. Policy X (3.3) Provide on-street parking as a secondary street function only in specifically designated areas such as in the downtown business district and in residential areas where off- street parking is limited. Streets should not be designed to provide on-street parking as a primary function, particularly in areas with frequent transit service. Policy X (3.4) Encourage parking on one side rather than both sides of streets with narrow rights-of- way, with the exception of downtown. Policy X (4.1) Encourage the efficient movement of people and goods through an effective and inter-connected transportation network that includes: collector and arterial streets, , trails, bike paths, public transit and other transportation facilities. Policy X (4.4) Design streets to accommodate emergency service vehicles. Improve emergency service access to the waterfront. Policy X (4.5) Coordinate traffic signals located within ½ mile of each other to decrease delay and improve operations. Policy X (5.2) Use public rights-of-way only for public purposes. The private use of a public right-of- way is prohibited unless expressly granted by the City. Policy X (6.1) Construct pedestrian facilities on all streets and highways, interconnecting with other modes of transportation. Policy X (6.8) Locate walking paths and additional street features such as benches and shelters along transit routes to provide easy access to transit stops. Packet Page 257 of 344 Policy X (9.12) Explore future funding for a city-based circulator bus that provides local shuttle service between neighborhoods (Firdale Village, Perrinville, Five Corners, Westgate) and downtown. Policy X (11.1) Place priority on coordinating bus routes and bus stop sites in City plans for street lighting improvements. Policy X (11.3) Consider transit stop sites in the design of roadways, walking path improvements and land use permit reviews. Policy X (12.1) Design Arterial and Collector roadways to accommodate buses and other modes of public transportation including the use of high occupancy vehicle priority treatments, transit signal priority, queue bypass lanes, boarding pads and shelter pads, and transit-only lanes where appropriate. Policy X (15.7) Work toward development of a multi-modal LOS standard that considers transit and non-motorized operations as well as automobile operations. Policy X (16.3) Provide additional transportation facility capacity when existing facilities are used to their maximum level of efficiency consistent with adopted LOS standards. Packet Page 258 of 344 GOAL 6: PARTNER WITH OTHER ENTITIES TO CREATE A LOGICAL SYSTEM THAT INTEGRATES WITHIN THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. Policy X (3.15) Provide access between private property and the public street system that is safe and convenient, and incorporates the following considerations: • Limit and provide access to the street network in a manner consistent with the function and purpose of each roadway. Restrict number of driveways located along arterials. Coordinate with local businesses and property owners to consolidate access points in commercial and residential areas. • Require new development to consolidate and minimize access points along all state highways, principal arterials, and minor arterials. • Design the street system so that the majority of direct residential access is provided via local streets. • For access onto state highways, implement Chapter 468-52 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC), Highway Access Management -- Access Control Classification System and Standards. Policy X (8.3) Provide safe bicycle connections to existing bicycle facilities in adjacent jurisdictions. Policy X (9.1) Work with transit providers to ensure that transit service within the city is: • Convenient and flexible to meet community and user needs; • Dependable, affordable, and maintains regular schedules; • Provides adequate service during evening hours, weekends, and holidays; and • Comfortable and safe for all users. Policy X (9.2) Work with transit providers to ensure that public transit is accessible within a half mile of any address in the city. Policy X (9.3) Work with transit providers to serve designated activity centers with appropriate levels of transit service. Transit stops should be properly located throughout the activity center, and designed to serve local commuting and activity patterns, and significant concentrations of employment. Policy X (9.4) Design new development and redevelopment in activity centers to provide pedestrian access to transit. Packet Page 259 of 344 Policy X (9.5) Work with transit agencies to coordinate public transit with school district transportation systems to provide transit connections for school children. Policy X (9.7) Form a multimodal system that links ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non-motorized travel providing access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local commercial districts and residential neighborhoods. Policy X (9.9) Locate and design a multi-modal transportation center and terminal to serve the city’s needs with the following elements: • A ferry terminal that meets the operational requirements to accommodate forecast ridership demand and that provides proper separation of automobile, bicycle and walk-on passenger loading; • A train station that meets intercity passenger service and commuter rail loading requirements, and provides the requisite amenities such as waiting areas, storage and bicycle lockers; • A transit center with connections to major regional destinations; • A linkage between stations/terminals that meets the operational and safety requirements of each mode, including a link between the multi-modal station terminal to the business/commerce center in downtown Edmonds; • Safety features that include better separation between train traffic and other modes of travel, particularly vehicle and passenger ferry traffic as well as the general public; and • Overall facility design that minimizes the impact to the natural environment, in particular the adjacent marshes. Policy X (9.10) Encourage joint public/private efforts to develop and implement transportation demand management and traffic reduction strategies. Policy X (9.11) Work with both public and private entities to ensure the provision of adequate transportation facilities and services necessary to mitigate impacts to Edmonds’ transportation system. Policy X (10.1) Participate in local and regional forums to coordinate strategies and programs that further the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy X (10.2) Coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions and regional and state agencies to make transportation system improvements and assure that funding requirements are met. Packet Page 260 of 344 Policy X (10.3) Encourage public transportation providers within the city to coordinate services to ensure the most effective transportation systems possible and provide comfortable stop amenities. Policy X (10.4) Coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions and regional and state agencies to encourage their support of the City’s policies and planning processes. Policy X (10.5) Participate on the boards of Community Transit and other public transit providers, and regularly share citizen and business comments regarding transit services to the appropriate provider. Policy X (11.4) Work with Community Transit to provide additional passenger shelters and benches at bus stops sites within Edmonds. Policy X (12.2) Coordinate with local public transit agencies and private transit providers regarding road closures or other events that may disrupt normal transit operations in order to minimize impacts to transit customers. Policy X (16.5) Work with Community Transit and local employers to encourage ridesharing to employment centers and major activity centers. Policy X (17.1) Coordinate with non-City providers of transportation facilities and services on a joint program for maintaining adopted LOS standards, funding and construction of capital improvements. Work in partnership with non-City transportation facility providers to prepare functional plans consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan. Policy X (17.2) Regularly coordinate with WSDOT, Washington State Ferries, Community Transit, King County Metro, Snohomish County, the Town of Woodway, and the Cities of Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood, Shoreline, and Mukilteo, to ensure planning for transportation facilities is compatible. New potential policies based on Planning Board feedback: Electric Vehicle Policy Encourage and promote the use of electric vehicles as they are developed in all automobile, truck, and commercial vehicle classes. Encourage the use of such vehicles in a way that conditions are safe and don’t impede traffic flow. Provide for a broad range of charging opportunities at public and private parking venues throughout the city, including minimum standards for new developments that provide parking facilities. Position Edmonds to respond to technical innovations, such as electric vehicles and driverless cars. Coordinate with PSRC and other regional entitles to understand regional plans for electric vehicle charging and accommodation of other alternative fuel sources. Packet Page 261 of 344 City of Edmonds Transportation Plan Update Goals and Policies Check-In Packet Page 262 of 344 Overview of Topics GMA Requirements State Guidance Existing Goals & Policies Input Packet Page 263 of 344 GMA Requirements for Transportation Element Travel forecasts align with land use assumptions Intergovernmental coordination Define level of service for all modes Projects align with level of service objectives Financially constrained Goals & Policies layout is consistent with the rest of the Comprehensive Plan Packet Page 264 of 344 Vision 2040 Requirements Maintenance, Management, and Safety – Maintain, preserve, and operate the existing transportation system in a safe and usable state. Support the Growth Strategy – Support the regional growth strategy by focusing on connecting centers with a highly efficient multimodal transportation network. Greater Options, Mobility, and Access – Invest in transportation systems that offer greater options, mobility, and access in support of the regional growth strategy. Packet Page 265 of 344 Goals and Policies: State Guidance ▪Goals and polices define priorities in written terms. ▪Address all modes of travel (autos, transit, walking, biking), transportation demand management, and funding. ▪GMA requires development regulations, capital budget decisions, and other activities to be consistent with goals and policies. Packet Page 266 of 344 Existing Document Structure Overall Vision: ??? Goal •Aspirational, overarching theme Objective •More concrete, allows for measurement Policy •Actionable steps Packet Page 267 of 344 Proposed Streamlining Currently 19 goals, 22 objectives, 132 policies organized into 8 major categories. Suggest no more than 6 goals Objectives/policies should nest within Projects and programs should be extracted as action items Packet Page 268 of 344 Proposed Goals Provide a safe and user-friendly travel experience for all users. Build a transportation system that enhances the City’s land use vision. Be sustainable, financially, environmentally, and socially. Foster an active and healthy community. Create a complete and connected system that offers efficient transportation options. Partner with other entities to create a logical system that integrates within the regional transportation network. Packet Page 269 of 344 Input received from Planning Board Highlight City’s commitment to Complete Streets Define non-motorized users broadly Describe walkways, not just sidewalks Focus on connectivity to major transit nodes Position City for electric vehicles Add explicit policies around keeping the City’s facilities in a state of good repair Packet Page 270 of 344 Input from the Council Do the proposed goals accomplish the City’s overall vision? Are there any changes to the goals and policies that you would like to see? Packet Page 271 of 344 Next Steps Early April: Return to PB with draft project list, based on goals and policies Late April: Bring draft project list (with PB edits) to City Council Packet Page 272 of 344 Questions? Kendra Breiland k.breiland@fehrandpeers.com Packet Page 273 of 344    AM-7518     9.              City Council Meeting Meeting Date:03/03/2015 Time:2 Hours   Submitted For:Council President Fraley-Monillas Submitted By:Jana Spellman Department:City Council Review Committee: Committee Action:  Type: Potential Action  Information Subject Title Council Position #2 Vacancy Deliberations Recommendation Previous Council Action On February 17, 2015, the Council interviewed 10 applicants for the Council Position #2 Vacancy. Narrative The following candidates will be taken into consideration to fill the vacancy for Council Position #2. Applicant 1. Mario Brown 2. Stephen Clifton 3. Adam Cornell 4. Debbie Matteson 5. Michael Jay Nelson 6. David Preston 7. Alvin Rutledge 8. Jeff Scherrer 9. Neil Tibbott 10. David L. Teitzel Attached are the interviewees' applications.  Please note they are in alphabetical order.  Attachments Council Position #2 applications Form Review Inbox Reviewed By Date City Clerk Scott Passey 02/26/2015 09:43 AM Mayor Dave Earling 02/26/2015 10:24 AM Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/27/2015 07:00 AM Packet Page 274 of 344 Finalize for Agenda Scott Passey 02/27/2015 07:00 AM Form Started By: Jana Spellman Started On: 02/24/2015 09:33 AM Final Approval Date: 02/27/2015  Packet Page 275 of 344 Packet Page 276 of 344 Packet Page 277 of 344 Packet Page 278 of 344 Packet Page 279 of 344 Packet Page 280 of 344 Packet Page 281 of 344 Packet Page 282 of 344 Packet Page 283 of 344 Packet Page 284 of 344 Packet Page 285 of 344 Packet Page 286 of 344 Packet Page 287 of 344 Packet Page 288 of 344 Packet Page 289 of 344 Packet Page 290 of 344 Packet Page 291 of 344 Packet Page 292 of 344 Packet Page 293 of 344 Packet Page 294 of 344 Packet Page 295 of 344 Packet Page 296 of 344 Packet Page 297 of 344 Packet Page 298 of 344 Packet Page 299 of 344 Packet Page 300 of 344 Packet Page 301 of 344 Packet Page 302 of 344 Packet Page 303 of 344 Packet Page 304 of 344 Packet Page 305 of 344 Packet Page 306 of 344 Packet Page 307 of 344 Packet Page 308 of 344 Packet Page 309 of 344 Packet Page 310 of 344 Packet Page 311 of 344 Packet Page 312 of 344 Packet Page 313 of 344 Packet Page 314 of 344 Packet Page 315 of 344 Packet Page 316 of 344 Packet Page 317 of 344 Packet Page 318 of 344 Packet Page 319 of 344 Packet Page 320 of 344 Packet Page 321 of 344 Packet Page 322 of 344 Packet Page 323 of 344 Packet Page 324 of 344 Packet Page 325 of 344 Packet Page 326 of 344 Packet Page 327 of 344 Packet Page 328 of 344 Packet Page 329 of 344 Packet Page 330 of 344 Packet Page 331 of 344 Packet Page 332 of 344 Packet Page 333 of 344 Packet Page 334 of 344 Packet Page 335 of 344 Packet Page 336 of 344 Packet Page 337 of 344 Packet Page 338 of 344 Packet Page 339 of 344 Packet Page 340 of 344 Packet Page 341 of 344 Packet Page 342 of 344 Packet Page 343 of 344 Packet Page 344 of 344