Vista Del Mar Detention Storage CalculationsLOVELL-SAUERLAND & ASSOCIATES, INC.
19400 33rd Avenue W.
Lynnwood, WA 98036
DETENTION STORAGE CALCULATIONS
AND DRAINAGE BASIN REPORT
FOR
PLAT OF VISTA DEL MAR
on Olympic View Drive
at 92nd Avenue West, Edmonds
vl•J
1.1 k'1% kfAt
S
L2
K14 f o
,6L01 l�
4k
Li Prepared By:
S J `.s i • �:
a�
')io��1gL
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND EXISTING CONDITONS
The project consists of the subdivision of several contiguous land parcels into
approximately 15 lots for construction of single family dwellings. Subdivision
improvements would include the construction of public and private roads, utilities, and a
storm water collection system.
The properties are situated at the top of a bluff adjacent to Puget Sound. A 100-foot
wide Burlington Northern Railroad right-of-way lies between Puget Sound and the
property. The site is currently occupied by two houses and some small out -buildings.
The smaller of the houses lies at the south boundary of the site, and is accessed by an
off -site private road from the south. The larger house lies near the center of the site,
and is accessed by a looped driveway having a total length of about 1000 feet.
About a half of the site is clear of trees and brush, and has historically been lawn with
large landscape shrubs and trees. The remainder of the site is covered with second
growth evergreen forest.
Existing Sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems cross the northernmost portion of
the site. The northern portion of the site is accessed by easement through an adjacent
single family lot.
EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
All surface runoff from the site eventually drains to the drainage ditch in the BNRR
right-of-way. Most is apparently transported by direct overland flow, but some from the
site's forested area is possibly collected in the private systems to the south. These
private systems would also eventually discharge in the same BNRR ditch. The ditch
drains to the 18-inch culvert crossing under the tracks adjacent to the site.
The northernmost end of the piped storm drainage system crossing the site discharges
into Puget sound just north of the site. It drains a basin which includes roughly 155
acres, but does not currently include any significant portion of the site. This basin is
discussed in detail below, as it is proposed to use this system to convey future
developed runoff.
A study of the overall basin was completed by URS Consultants for the City of
Edmonds, as documented in their report "Edmonds Drainage Basin'Studies" dated
June 1989. The basin was one of several subbasins identified in the Talbot Park
Drainage Basin.
Portions of the study relating to this basin were provided in a preliminary report to the
City dated 4/23/93 (by Lovell-Sauerland). It was noted that the elements in the area of
Lovell-Sauertand and Associates August23, 1996 Page 2
the project in general had sufficient capacity to convey the 100 year storm in a future
"built -out" basin. Upstream system capacities (above the proposed development) fall
well short of the requirements for this particular design storm.
DRAINAGE ISSUES
The drainage improvements must address two basic issues. First, it is considered
desirable to reduce or eliminate surface runoff onto or near the face of the bluff. In
particular, concentrated flows from impervious areas must be collected and safely
conveyed so as not to increase erosion on the face of the bluff.
Due to the BNRR right-of-way and the intolerance the BNRR has demonstrated for
improvements by others in land they control, and due to the steepness of the bluff
sloping to the BNRR right-of-way, it is not considered feasible to convey storm runoff by
any new piped system to Puget Sound, or to the BNRR ditch. Storm runoff must be
conveyed by pipe to the existing storm sewer crossing the property. The proposed
runoff collection system accomplishes this.
The second issue is whether the runoff can be released without control or whether it
must first be detained to match existing peak runoff levels. To answer this, the capacity
needs of the upstream basin and available capacity of the downstream system were
reviewed. The details of this study are at the end of this report in Appendix A.
The study showed that even at a maximum capacity of 55 cfs, the last pipe in the
downstream system is still undersized for the 100-year peak runoff from the basin of
65.63 cfs. Therefore, the Vista Del Mar project will require detention to comply with city
code. The detention will not eliminate the potential flooding, but will mitigate any
possible impact by the Vista Del Mar development.
In summary, given the apparent lack of downstream pipe capacity, the project will need
to provide detention for the plat because:
The entire upstream basin produces a calculated runoff greater than the capacity
of that pipe, and
2 Even though the pipe network feeding that pipe is of a lower capacity, it cannot
be guaranteed on paper that the combination of pipe and gutter flow would not
deliver enough water to overflow it. It also cannot be guaranteed that the City
won't correct the existing upstream capacity deficiencies.
3. The potential flooding of the BNRR property is an existing situation which may
occur, with or without the plat. Construction of the plat will likely result in a small
incremental increase in the probable maximum flow.
4. Construction of a detention system for the plat will not eliminate this problem. It
Lovell-Sauedand and Associates August 23, 1996 Page 3
will only mitigate the new plat's share of the problem, and "prove" that the plat is
not a contributor to future flooding.
Since there is a potential downstream problem, which the plat may aggravate, the letter
of the code must be fulfilled to limit future liability.
DETENTION CALCULATIONS
Calculations and the drainage plan were completed to meet City of Edmonds 1995
standards, using an SCS-SBUH analysis. Since there is no downstream natural
watercourse, the criteria used includes restriction of 10-year and 100-year flows to
match the existing runoff for each of those events. The model used for the analysis is
called WaterWorksT", which was developed by Engenious Systems Inc. The program
generates runoff hydrographs for each design basin area and allows them to be routed
through various configurations of storage and discharge structures. Through a process
of trial and error, a configuration is found that meets the criteria for the design storm.
Due to the topography of the site, two detention pipes and a water quality swale are
proposed. All of the impervious areas of the site will be conveyed by the biofiltration
swale. About a 1/4 acre of the site bypasses the detention facilities, but the
calculations demonstrate that the release criteria are met by comparing the sum of all
developed release hydrogaphs with the existing site runoff. It is noted that although the
sum of pipe discharges and the bypass peak flows exceed the allowable discharge, the
peaks do not all occur at the same time and the peak of the total discharge hydrograph
is less.
Assumptions used for the detention calculation include
1. Site soils are of hydrologic group "C"
2. One offsite house will drain to the detention system, making a total of 3 existing
homes. The total existing impervious area on and offsite is over 20,000 square
feet. However, it is assumed that only 5,000 sf per home exists for the existing
homes on the site. New impervious is assumed to be the area of the roads, plus
5,000 sf per lot.
3, The design storms are per the City's new ordinance
4. Yard areas of lots 7-10 and 13-15 are already grass, and have been historically.
The hydrologic character of these areas will not change, and they are not
included in the calculation. Runoff from these areas can be routed to the
drainage system, but will bypass the detention.
5. Existing conditions are assumed to be 50 percent second growth forest and 50
percent meadow (with some existing impervious).
Lovell-Sauedand and Associates August 23, 1996 Page 4
SCS weighted average curve number calculations, are attached. Detailed detention
storage calculations follow.
A. DETENTION SUMMARY TABLE
Recurrence interval:
10-Year
100-Year
Exist. development area runoff
0.40 cfs
0.92 cfs
Peak pipe design discharge
Pipe in Kairez Drive
0.15 cfs
0.44 cfs
Pipe in Nicholas Lane
0.09_cfs
0 36 cfs
Peak runoff from bypass area
0.24 cfs,
0.42 cfs
Design discharge (detention
0.42 cfs
0.92 cfs
pipes + bypass)
Design detention storage
Pipe in Kairez Drive
4,064 cf
5.752 of
Pipe in Nicholas Lane
1,915 cf
2,363 cf
• no � ,,,ham
Vol b� k•✓^
Note: Since the waterworks program does hot model CMPA, and does not allow
the inclusion of structures, the ultimate detention pipe configuration is based on
the attached spreadsheets labelled "Detention pipe for Nicholas Lane" and
"Detention pipe for Kairez Place." These provide the final pipe and orifice size
and location.
B. DETENTION CALCULATION DETAILS — Waterworks printout
\r
waterworks batch file: INC
MOVE 1OB TO 3 -� ,/ tip'- ' - %U k. [A`'
MOVE OOB TO 13 f'x 1 `�
MOVE 10E TO 9 V A 6 J L13
MOVE DOE TO 19 (��� t,,,'T
LPOOL 1 "10-YEAR KAIREZ" 10E 1OFK PIPEK CTRLK 1
LPOOL 2 "100-YEAR KAIREZ" DOE OOFK PIPEK CTRLK 11
LPOOL 4 "10-YR NICHOLAS" l0E IOFN PIPEN CTRLN 2
LPOOL 5 "100-YR NICHOLAS" DOE OOFN PIPEN CTRLN 12
ADD 1 2 4
ADD 3 4 10
ADD 11 12 14
ADD 13 14 20
8/22/96 Lovell-Sauerland 6 Associates Inc page 1
Lovell-Sauerland and Associates August 23, 1996 Page 5
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: OOE
NAME: 100-YEAR EXISTING
-
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
3.99 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION....:
3.00 inches
AREA..:
3.65 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN....:
82.80
TIME OF CONC.....:
31.11 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
0.34 Acres
CN....:
98.00
TcReach - Sheet
L: 280.00 ns:0.4000 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.1600
PEAK RATE: 0.92
cfs VOL: 0.51
Ac-ft TIME:
490 min
BASIN ID: OOFB
NAME: 100-YEAR DEVELOPED
BYPASS
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
.0.27 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION....:
3.00 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN....:
85.50
TIME OF CONC.....:
10.00 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
0.27 Acres
CN....:
.00
PEAK RATE: 0.16
cfs VOL: 0.06
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
BASIN ID: OOFK
NAME: 100-YEAR DEVELOPED
KAIRE2 LANE
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
2.71 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION....:
3.00 inches
AREA..:
1.22 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN....:
$5.50
TIME OF CONC.....:
14.60 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
1.49 Acres
CN....:
T$ 0-6- �
TcReach - Sheet
L: 290.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50
s:0.1600
PEAK RATE: 1.23
cfs VOL: 0.51
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
8/22/96 Lovell-Sauerland 6 Associates Inc
BASIN ID: OOFN
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
RAINFALL TYPE .... :
PRECIPITATION....:
TIME INTERVAL....:
TIME OF CONC.....:
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
! �:�94:4FY+i3w�:7,y7
NAME: 100-YEAR DEVELOPED ttICHOLAS IN
�
IS
page 2
1.02 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
3.00 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
10.00 min
CN....:
85.50
10.00 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
0.20
AREA..:
1.Q2 Acres
PEAK RATE: 0.61 cfs VOL:
CN....: 98.00
0.23 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
Lovell-Sauedand and Associates August 23, 1996 Page 6
BASIN ID: 10E
NAME: 10-YEAR EXISTING
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
3.99 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION....:
2.00 inches
AREA..:
3.65 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN....:
82.80
TIME OF CONC.....:
31.11 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
0.34 Acres
CN....:
98.00
TcReach - Sheet
L: 280.00 ns:0.4000
p2yr: 1.50
s:0.1600
PEAK RATE: 0.40
cfs VOL: 0.26
Ac-ft TIME:
490 min
BASIN ID: 10FB
NAME: 10-YEAR
DEVELOPED BYPASS
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
0.27 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPElA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION....:
2.00 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN....:
85.50
TIME OF CONC.....:
10.00 min
IMPERVIOUS
AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..:
0.27 Acres
CN....:
98.00
PEAK RATE: 0.11
cfs VOL: 0.04
Ac-ft TIME:
480 min
8/22/96 Lovell-Sauerland 6
Associates
Inc page 3
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: 10FK
NAME: 10-YEAR
KAIREZ DEVELOPED
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
2.71 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPELA
PERVIOUS AREA
PRECIPITATION....:
2.00 inches
AREA..: 1.22 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN....: 85.50
TIME OF CONC.....:
14.60 min
IMPERVIOUS AREA
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
AREA..: 1.49 Acres
CN....: 98.00
TcReach - Sheet
W 290.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.1600
PEAK RATE: 0.72
cfs VOL: 0.30 Ac-ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: 1OFN
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
RAINFALL TYPE....:
PRECIPITATION....:
TIME INTERVAL....:
TIME OF CONC.....:
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
NAME: 10-YEAR DEVELOPED NICHOLAS
1.02 Acres
TYPELA
2.00 inches
10.00 min
10.00 min
0.20
PEAK RATE: 0.40 cfs VOL: 0
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
PERVIOUS AREA
AREA..: 0.00 Acres
CN....: 85.50
IMPERVIOUS AREA
AREA..: 1.02 Acres
CN....: 98.00
15 Ac-ft TIME: 48D min
8/22/96 Lovell-Sauerland 6 Associates Inc page 4
Love#-Sauerland and Associates August 23, 1996
Page 7
HYDROGRAPH SUMMARY
PEAK
TIME
VOLUME
HYD
RUNOFF
OF
OF
Contrib
NUM
RATE
PEAK
HYDRO
Area
cfS
min.
cf-AcFt
Acres
Ll
�0.154
810
13184
cf
2.71
2
0.087
690
6547
cf
1.02
3
0.238
480
4010
cf
0.91
4
0.240
800
19731
cf
3.73
9
0.399
490
11207
cf
3.99
10
0.418
480
23741
cf
4.64
11
0.436
570
22083
cf
2.71
12
0.359
510
10214
cf
1.02
13
0.422
480
6915
cf
0.91
14
0.739
530
32297
cf
3.73
19
0.921
490
22284
cf
3.99
20
0.916
520
39212
cf
4.64
8/22/96 Lovell-Sauerland s ASSoefates Inc
page 5
STAGE STORAGE TABLE •av-ei•-s_'�-
UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. PIPES
Description: PIPE IN 1UIIREE DRIVE
Diameter: 7.50 ft, Length: 150.00 ft.
Slope...: 0.0050 ft/ft
STAGE <---- STORAGE ---- > STAGE <---- STORAGE ---- >
(ft)---of-----Ac-Ft- (ft) --cf----AC-Ft-
146.00
0.0000
0.0000
140.20
1165
0.0267
146.10
1.1502
0.0000
149.20
1260
0.0289
146.20
6.4801
0.0001
148.30
1356
0.0311
146.30
17.782
0.0004
148.40
1455
0.0334
146.40
36.354
0.0008
148.50
1554
0.0357
146.50
63.244
0.0015
148.60
1656
0.0380
146.60
99.344
0.0023
148.70
1758
0.0404
146.70
145.44
0.0033
148.80
1862
0.0428
146.80
192.62
0.0044
148.90
1968
0.0452
146.90
241.05
0.0055
149.00
2074
0.0476
147.00
296.51
0.0068
149.10
2181
0.0501
147.10
357.57
0.0082
149.20
2289
0.0525
147.20
423.35
0.0097
149.30
2398
0.0550
147.30
493.35
0.0113
149.40
2507
0.0576
147.40
567.09
0,0130
149.50
2617
0.06D1
147.50
644.19
0.0148
149.60
2728
0.0626
147.60
724.46
0.0166
149.70
2838
0.0651
147.70
807.63
0.0185
149.80
2951
0.0677
147.80
893.44
0.0205
149.90
3061
0.0703
141.90
981.75
0.0225
150.00
3174
0.0729
148.00
1072
0.0246
250.10
3286
0.0754
STAGE < ---- STORAGE ---- > STAGE <---- STORAGE----:
(It) --cf-----Ac-Ft- (ft) --cf---Ac-Ft-
150.20
3391
0.0700
152.30
5600
0.1286
150.30
3509
0.0806
152,40
5689
0.1306
150.40
3621
0.0831
152.50
5777
0.1326
150.50
3732
0,0057
152.60
5661
0.1346
150.60
3844
0.0862
152.70
5943
0.1364
150.70
3954
0.0908
152.80
6022
0.1382
150.50
4065
0.0933
152.90
6097
0.1400
150.90
4174
0.0958
153.00
6169
0.1416
151.00
4284
0.0983
153.10
6237
0.1432
151.10
4392
0.1008
153.20
6300
0.1446
151.20
4500
0.1033
153.30
6359
0.1460
151.30
4606
0.1057
153.40
6411
0.1472
151.40
4712
0.1082
153.50
6454
0.1482
151.50
4817
0.1106
153.60
6506
0.1494
151.60
4920
0.1129
153.70
6547
0.1503
151.70
5022
0.1153
153.80
6578
0.1510
151.80
5122
0.1176
153.90
6601
0.1515
151.90
5222
0.1199
154-00
6616
0.1519
152.00
5319
0.1221
154.10
6624
0.1521
152.10
5415
0.1243
154.20
6627
0.1521
152.20
5500
0.1265
154.25
6627
0.1521
8/22/96 Lovell-Sauerland 4 Associates Inc page 6
Lovell-Sausdand and Associates August 23, 1996
Page 8
^__�•__~•-a-"ii6'- STAGE STORAGE TABLE ®vRv
UNDERGROUND PIPE ID No. PIPEN
Description: PIPE IN NICHOLAS LANE
Diameter: 5.00 ft. Length: 150.00 ft.
Slope...: 0.0050 ft/ft
STAGE <---STORAGE--->
STAGE <---- STORAGE--->
STAGE <---- STORAGE ---- >
STAGE <--STORAGE ---- >
(ft)---cf-----AC-Ft-
(ft)---cf---
--Ac-Ft-
(ft)--cf---
--Ac-Ft-
(ft)
---Cf-
--AC-Ft-
95 00�
0. 0000-
0.0000
96.50
510. 70
0. 0117
98.00
1565
0.0359�
99.50
2581
0.0592•i
95.10
0.9370
0.0000
96.60
572.26
0.0131
98.10
1639
0.0376
99.60
2634
0.0605
95.20
5.2689
0.0001
96.70
636.32
0.0146
98.20
1713
0.0393
99.70
2684
0.0616
95.30
14.431
0.0003
96.80
702.09
0.0161
90.30
1786
0.0410
99.80
2731
0.0627
95.40
29.435
0.0007
96.90
769.36
0.0177
98.40
1859
0.0427
99.90
2172
0.0636
95.50
51.094
0.0012
97.00
837.98
0.0192
98.50
1931
0.0443
100.00
2807
0.0644
95.60
80.083
0.0018
97.10
907.75
0.0208
96.60
2002
0.0460
100.10
2648
0.0654
95.70
116.96
0.0027
97.20
978.59
0.0225
98.70
2073
0.0476
100.20
2881
0.0661
95.80
154.57
0.0035
97.30
1050
0.0241
98.90
2142
0.0492
100.30
2906
0.0667
95.90
193.13
0.0044
97.40
1123
0.0258
90.90
2210
0.0507
100.40
2924
0.0671
96.00
237.19
0.0054
97.50
1196
0.0274
99.00
2276
0.0523
100.50
2936
0.0674
96.10
285.54
0.0066
97.60
1269
0.0291
99.10
2341
0.0537
100.60
2943
0.0676
96.20
337.43
0.0077
97.10
1343
0.0309
99.20
2404
0.0552
100.70
2945
0.0616
96.30
392.37
0.0090
97.80
1417
O.D325
99.30
2465
0.0566
100.75
2945
0.0676
96.40
450.03
0.0103
97.90
1491
O.D342
99.40
2524
0.0580
8/22/96
Lovell-Sauerland
a Associates
Inc
page 7
STAGE DISCHARGE-TABLB=---�._..__-_--
COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. CTRLR
Description: AAIREE DRIVE CONTROL STRUCTURE
Structure: OE structure:
Structure: RE Structure:
Structure:
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- > STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
(ft)
--- cfs---------
w148.30
(ft)
--- cfs--
------- (ft)
--- cfs---------
(ft)
---cfs---------
146.000.0000-`tom
0.1067
150.6D
0.1509
152.90
0.4750-
146.10
0.0222
148.40
0.1090
150.70
0.1525
153.00
0.4835
146.20
0.0315
148.50
0.1112
150.B0
0.1541
153.10
0.4918
146.30
D.0385
148.60
0.1134
150.90
0.1557
153.20
0.5000
146.40
D.0445
240.70
0.1156
151.00
0.2222
153.30
0.5080
146.50
0.0497
148.80
0.1177
151.10
0.2506
153.40
0.5158
146.60
0.0545
148.90
0.1198
151.20
0.2728
153.50
0.5236
146.70
0.0589
149.00
0.121E
151.30
0.2917
153.60
0.5311
116.80
0.0629
149.10
0.1239
151.4D
0.3006
153.70
0.5396
146.90
0.0661
149.20
0.1258
151.50
0.3239
153.80
0.5459
147.00
0.0703
149.30
0.1278
151.60
0.3382
153.90
0.5532
147.10
0.0738
149.40
0.1297
151.70
0.3515
154.00
0.5603
147.20
0.0771
149.50
0.1316
151.80
0.3641
154.30
0.8753
147.30
0.0802
149.60
0.1335
151.GD
0.3761
154.20
1.4453
147.40
0.0832
149.70
0.1353
152.(0
0.3875
154.30
2.1813
147.50
0.0862
149.80
0.1371
152.10
0.3985
154.40
2.9790
147.60
0.0890
149.90
0.1389
152.20
0.4091
154.50
3.2687
147.70
0.0917
150.00
0.1407
152.30
0.4194
154.60
3.5306
147.80
0.0944
150.10
0,1424
152.40
0.4293
154.70
3.7718
147.90
0.0970
150.20
0.1442
152.50
0.4389
154.80
3.9967
148.00
0.0995
150.30
0.1459
152.60
0.4483
154.90
4.2082
148.10
0.1019
150.40
0.1476
152.70
0.4574
155.00
4.4086
148.20
0.1043
150.50
0.1492
152.80
0.4663
Lovell-Sausdand and Associates
August 23, 1996
Page 9
8122/96 Lovell-Sauerland 4 Associates Inc page e
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
COMBINATION DISCHARGE ID No. CTRIA
Description: NICHOLAS LANE CONTROL STRDCT
Structure: ON Structure:
Structure: RN Structure:
STAGE <-DISCHARGE--> STAGE <--DISCHARGE--> STAGE <--DISCHARGE--> STAGE <-DISCHARGE-->
(it) ---cfs--------- Ift) ---cfa--------- (ft) --- cfa--------- (ft) ---cfs-- ------
95.00
0.0000
96.60
0.0589
98.20
0.0833
99.00
0.4811
95.10
0.0147
96.70
0.0607
98.30
0.0846
99.90
0.4964
95.20
0.0208
96.80
0.0625
98.40
0.0859
100.00
0.5113
95.30
0.0255
96.90
0.0642
98.50
0.0871
100.10
0.5257
95.4D
0.0295
97.00
0.0659
98.60
0.1935
100.20
0.5396
95.50
0.0329
97.20
0.0675
98.70
0.2382
100.30
0.5532
95.6D
0.0361
97.20
0.0691
98.80
0.2729
100.40
0.5664
95.70
0.0390
97.30
0.0706
WED
0.3022
100.50
0.5793
95.00
D.0417
97.40
0.0721
99.10
0.3282
100.60
O.B999
95.90
0.0442
97.50
0.0736
99.10
0.3518
100.70
2.4153
96.00
0.0466
97.60
0.0751
99.20
0.3736
100.80
2.2166
96.10
0.0488
97.70
0.0765
99.30
0.3939
100.90
3.0919
96.20
0.0510
97.80
0.0779
99.40
0.4131
101.00
3.3140
96.30
0.0531
97.90
0.0793
99 50
0.4312
96.40
0.0551
98.00
0.0807
99.60
0.4485
96.50
0.0570
90.10
O.D820
99.70
0.4651
8/22/96 Lovell-Sauerland c Associates Inc page 9
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. OE
Description: ORIFICE FOR 101IREi DRIVE
Outlet Elev: 146.00
Elev: 146.00 ft Orifice Diameter: 1.6100 in.
Elev: 150.90 ft Orifice 2 Diameeter: 2.7500 in.
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- > STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE-->
(it)
--- cfs---------
(ft)
--- cfs--
------- (it)
--- cfs---------
(ft)
--- cis ---------
146.00
0.0000
148.30
0.1067
150.0
0.1509
152.90
0.4150
146.10
0.0222
148.40
0.1090
150.70
0.1525
153.00
0.4835
146.20
0.0315
148.50
0.1112
150.80
0.1541
153.10
0.4918
146.30
0.0385
148.60
0.1134
150-90
0.1557
153.20
0.5000
146.40
0.0445
148.70
0.1156
151.00
0.2222
153.30
0.5080
146.50
0-0497
148.80
0.1177
151 10
0.2506
153.40
0.5158
146.60
0.0545
148.90
0.1198
151.20
0.2728
153.50
0.5236
146.70
0.0589
149.00
0.1218
151.30
0.2917
153.60
0.5311
146.80
0.0629
149.10
0.1238
151.40
0.3086
153.70
0.5386
146.90
0.0667
149.20
0.1258
151.50
0.3239
153.80
0.5459
147.00
0.0703
149.30
0.1278
151.60
0.3382
153.90
0.5532
147.10
0.0738
149.40
0.1297
151.79
0.3515
154.00
0.5603
147.20
0.0771
149.50
0.1316
151.80
0.3641
154.10
0.5673
147.30
0.0802
149.60
0.1335
151.90
0.3761
154.20
0.5742
147.40
0.0832
149.70
0.1353
152.00
0.3875
154.30
0.5811
147.50
0.0862
149.80
0.1371
152.10
0.3985
154.40
0.5878
141.60
0.0890
149.90
0.1389
152.20
0.4091
154-50
0.5945
147.70
0.0917
150.00
0.1407
15;'.30
0.4194
154.60
0.6010
147.80
0.0944
150.10
0.1424
152.40
0.4293
154.10
0.6075
147.90
0.0970
150.20
0.1442
152.50
0.4389
154.80
0.6140
148.00
0.0995
150.30
0.1459
152.60
0.4483
154.90
0.6203
148.10
0.1019
150.40
0.1476
152.70
0.4574
155-00
0.6266
148.20
0.1043
150.50
0.1492
152.80
0.4663
Lovell-Sauerland and Associates
August 23, 1996
Page 10
8/22/96 Lovell-Sanerland 6 Associates Inc page 10
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
MULTIPLE ORIFICE ID No. ON
Description: ORIFICE IN NICHOLAS LANE
Outlet Elev: 95.00
Elev: 95.00 ft Orifice Diameter: 1.3100 in.
Elev: 98.50 ft Orifice 2 Diameter: 3.5000 in.
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<-DISCHARGE-->
STAGE
<--DI-SCH Rrc--->
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
(ft)
--- cfa---------
(ft)
•96.60
--- cfs-- ------
(ft)
--- cfs__ _______
(ft)
---cfs-- -_____
95.00
0.0000
0.0589
98.20
0.0033 y:
99-00
0.4611 =iiaa�'•
95.10
0.0147
96.70
0.0607
98.30
O.D046
99.90
0.4964
95.20
0.0208
96.80
0.0625
98.40
0.0859
100.00
0.5113
95.30
0-0255
96.90
0.0642
98.50
0.0871
100.10
0.5257
95.40
0.0295
97-00
0.0659
98.60
0.1935
100.20
0.5396
95.50
0.0329
97.10
0.0675
98.70
0.2382
100.30
0.5532
95.60
0.0361
97.20
0.0691
98.80
0.2729
100.40
0.5664
95.70
0.0390
97.30
0.0706
98.90
0.3022
100.50
0.5793
95.80
0.0417
97.40
0.0721
99.00
0.3282
100.60
0.5919
95.90
0.0442
97.50
0.0736
99.10
0.3518
100.70
0.6043
96.00
0.0466
97.60
0.0751
99.20
0.3736
100.80
0.6163
96.10
0.0488
97.70
0.0765
99.30
0.3939
100.90
0.6291
96.20
0.0510
97.80
0.0779
99.40
0.4131
101.00
0.6397
96.30
0.0531
97.90
0.0793
99.50
0.4312
96.40
0.0551
90.00
0.0807
99.60
0.4485
96.50
0.0570
98.10
0.0820
99.10
0.4651
8/22/96
Lovell-Sauerland 6 Associates Inc
pa;c
11
--...........................................a_.......�... .....�.
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
RISER DISCHARGE
ID No. RE
Description: RISER IN KAIREZ
DRIVE
Riser Diameter (in):
12.00
elev:
154.00 ft
Weir Coefficient...:
3.782
height:
155.00 ft
Orif Coefficient...:
9.739
increm:
0.10 ft
STAGE <--DISCHARGE-->
STAGE
<-DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE
<--DISCHARGrt--- >
_-------
cfa- (ft) __ -
--0.0000
_
(ft)
--- cfs__ _______
(ft)
___cfs -- _______
(ft)
___cfs__
154�00
154.20-�0.8711
154 5D
i2.6743 �
,I54 80
3.3827 --
154.00 0.0000
154.30
1.6003
154.60
2.9295
154.90
3.5879
154.10 0.3080
154.40
2.3919
154.10
3.1642
155_DO
3.7820
8/22/96 Lovell-Sauerland 6 Associates Inc
pa)E 12
STAGE DISCHARGE TABLE
RISER DISCHARGE ID No. RN
Description: RISER IN KAIREZ DRIVE
Riser Diameter (in): 12.00 elev: 100.50 ft
Weir Coefficient...: . 3.782 height: 101.00 ft
Orif Coefficient...: 9.739 increm: 0.10 ft
STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- > STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- >
STAGE <--DISCHARGE--->
(ft) ---cfs--------- (ft) ---cfs---------
(ft) --- cfs-- ----- -
Lovell-Saue<iend and Associates August 23, 1996
STAGE <--DISCHARGE --- >
(ft) ---cfa---------
Page 11
S00'S06 O'0000 100.60 0.3080 _. 100.80 L1.6003w 201.00 2.6143
100.50 0.0000 100.70 0.8711 100.90 2.4638 101.00 2-6743
8/22/96 Lovell-Sauerland i Associates Inc page 13
LEVEL POOL TABLE SUMMARY
MATCH INFLOW -STO- -DIS- <-PEAK-> STORAGE
<-------- DESCRIPTION --------- > (cfs) (cfs) --id- --id- <-STAGE> id VOL (cf)
10-YEAR KAIREZ ............... 0.40 0.72 PIPEK CTRLK 150.00 1 4064.24
100-YEAR KAIREZ .............. 0.921.23 PIPEK CTRLK 152.47 11 5752.99
10-YR NICHOLAS 0.90 PIPEN CTRLN 98.48 2 1915.09
100-YR NICHOLAS .............. - 0.61 PIPEN CTRLN 99.13 12 2363.08
1
y� f
i
1
+"I too y Y
UUE.)
lxt nuM�C'c, 1Ir on -i
�}hl5 L`` D�4wth n4J� IA(, C2
Lovell-SaueAand and AssocWw August 23, 1990 Page 12
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS 23-Aug-96
DETENTION PIPE FOR KAIREZ PLACE 08:50 AM
Y7a"1R1`yr1I94WA-=
Estimate of required detention storage volume = 6000 d
Assume a det pipearch 117.0 x 79.0 (width and height)
Goss section area = 52.0 sf
Usable vol. of Type I CS 6.0 s0ft = of
Usable vN. of 2.0 Type 11 MH 54.0 inch dia = 2004 d
Usable vol. of Type II MH 72.0 inch dia = d
Usable vol. of 18.0 inch pipe: It long = of 5
Usable vol. of 36.0 inch pipe: 4.0 ft long = 28 3 d
Required pipe volume = 5762.3 cubic feet
Required pipe length = 110.8 linear feet (,+C
Length of pipe used = 111.0 FT_
Storage provided = 6009.7 cubic feet
Minimum grade elevations: ei- 02 (�
Top DIS detention CB 156.19 with 2.50 It Overflow ctearance
Top DIS detention CB 155.08 with 2.0 ft cover j' (i• \, 7 �,\ r .
Top U/S detention CB 155.69 with 2.0 ft cover
Inv Grind surf. elev = 147,09 (over arty inlet 0.5 ft above OF �
Inv slay at U15 end = 1a7.06
Max water surface slay = 153.69 (detn. pipe sl. = 0 5D%) /
Invert elevation = 146.5001
CALCULATION OF OUTLET SIZE ,kb �K ` i / 1 Y�✓ y" bu�
Required release rate, orifice 1 = n 0
Required release rate, orifice 2= ` . 70 rr{"l / �Q J �• g
Required release rate, onfice 3 -
At elevation: H, It a, at d,6 d,inches prow. Y
146.50 6.63
150.50 2.03
Full storage -
area, a=Odo/(.62 x(2 xg xh)".5)
orifice diameter. d = (4/pi x a)".5
06
N
`u
!D
N
2
y 04
0.015 0.14
0.033 0.21
i
100-YEAR TARGET o
10•YEAR TARGET c
ob
a 2 4 5
T -"z
Detention Volume, cubic feet
1 - 11/16 0
2 - 12 4052
-0
------------ ---- 6010
g = 32.2
V
I Vs
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
DETENTION PIPE FOR NICHOLAS LANE 08.53 AM
DETENTION PIPE SIZE
Estimate of required detention storage volume = 2500 d
Assume a det. pipe 72.0 inches, diameter
Cross section area = 28.3 sf
Usable Vol of Type I C8 6.0 sUR = d
Usable Vol. of 2.0 Type II MH 54.0 inch dia = ' 90 9 d
Usable vol. of Type II MH 72.0 inch din = d
Usable vol. of 18.0 inch pipe: ft long - d
Usable vol. of 36.0 inch pipe: 4.0 It long = 28 3 d
Required pipe volume = 2280.9 cubic feet
Required pipe length = 80.7 linear feet
Length of pipe used = 81.0 FT.
Storage provided = 2509.3 cubic feel
Minimum grade elevations:
Top D/S detention CB 103.96 with 2 50 It Overflow clearance
Top D/S detention CB 103.00 with 2 0 It cover
Top U/S detention CB 103.46 with 2 0 ft cover
Min Gmd surf. elev = 101.96 (over any inlet 0 5 It above OF
Inv elev at U/S end = 95.41
Max water surface elev = 101.46 (detn. pipe sl, = 0.50% )
Invert elevation - 95.00
CALCULATION OF OUTLET SIZE ��•�'r+`t'�1� r^ �,
Required release rate, orifice 1 = 0.100 �� • rV ��•� f,
Required release rate, orifice 2 = 0.350
Required release rate, orifice 3 = A.
Storage
At elevation: H. ft a, sf d,ft d,inches �, f pmvd. a l
95.00 6.05 0.006 0.10 1 - 3116 0 n•'� O
99.50 1.55 0.057 0.27 3- 114 1968 Q �"
0
Full storage = 2509
area, a s Odo 1(.62 z(2 x 9 z hr.6) y=32.2 o r
orifice diameter, d - ( 410 x ar.5 r QL
oK
m os DL L41L4�
Wk04
` 0 �
'0 100-YEAR TARGET a �� If 1
oz
01
1
Detention Volume, cubic feet
VISTA DEL MAR, LSA 2926
23Aug-96
SCS Weighted average curve number calculations
08:54 AM
SCS Hydrologic Soils type:->
C
C
EXISTING
BASIN
n1a
Na
TOTAL
Basin area, sf.
174,000
0
0
174.000
Basin area acres:
3.99
0.00
0.00
3.99
Existing conditions (in square feet)
Assumptions:
CN:
CN
Undisturbed forest land
76
76
0
0
0
Second growth forest
81
87,000
81
87,000
Meadow or pasture
85
72,000
65
72,000
Grass, > 75% coverage
86
86
Dirt roadtparking lot
87
87
Gravel mad/parking lot
89
89
Grass, > 50% coverage
90
90
Orchard with crop cover
92
92
Cultivated land
94
94
Impervious
98
15,000
98
15,000
Existing onsde impervious =
13,9W
Open water
1 D0
------------
100
Total Weighted CN for each basin.
841
76.0
76.0
84.1
------------'--
Pervious:
---
Area, acres:
3.65
0.00
0,00
3.65
Weighted CN:
82.8
76.0
76.0
82.8
Impervious:
Area, acres:
0.34
0.34
Percent impervious area:
8.6%
8.6%
Detention 1
Detention 2
bypass
TOTAL
Future conditions Total AC
2.71
1.02
027
3.99
Total sf.
118,000
44,250
11,750
174,000
Assumptions:
CN:
CN
Undisturbed forest land
76
76
Second growth forest (@ 10% of grass)
81
4,818
81
0
0
4,818
Meadow or pasture
85
85
Grass, > 75% coverage
86
48.182
86
0
0
48,1a2
Dirt road/parking lots
87
87
Gravel road/parking lot
89
89
Grass, > 50% coverage
90
90
Orchard with crop cover
92
92
Cultivated land
94
94
Impervious
98
65,000
98
44,250
11,750
121,000
Other impervious
5.000
8,000
1.760
14.750
LF of road/sidewalk, plat road.
500
5W
Avg. Width of road/sidewalk
30 ft
LF of road/sidewalk, frontage.
200
250
450
Avg. Width of roadisidewalk
25 It
No. of housesnots
8
6
2
16
House/lot impervious
5,000 sUlot
5,000
5,000
5,000
Open water
100
100
-----------------------
--- ------ ----
----
Total Weighted CN for each basin:
------
---------------
g2.4
------------
98.0
98.0
--------------
94.2
Pervious:
Area, acres:
122
0.00
0.00
122
Weighted CN:
85.5
85.5
85.5
85.5
Impervious:
Area, acres:
1.49
1.02
0.27
2.78
Percent impervious area:
55.1%
100.0%
100.0%
69.5%