Loading...
2024-08-22 Architectural Design Board Packet41 OE LUMG do Agenda Edmonds Architectural Design Board REGULAR MEETING BRACKETT ROOM 121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020 AUGUST 22, 2024, 6:00 PM REGULAR MEETING INFORMATION This is a Hybrid meeting. Attendees may appear in person or on-line via the zoom link provided. Physical Meeting Location: Brackett Room, 3rd Floor Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue N. Zoom Link: https://edmondswa- gov.zoom.us/j/88959586932?pwd=RzdPWUIwM09PZ1k1MHN2eWM1YXphZz09 Passcode:591531 1. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. AUDIENCE COMMENTS Statement: This is an opportunity to comment regarding any matter not listed on the agenda as public hearing. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please clearly state your name and city of residence. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. 8835 : Previous meeting minutes June 27th 5. NEW BUSINESS 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. BOARD REVIEW ITEMS Items requiring review and recommendation from the ADB. 8. BOARD DISCUSSION ITEMS A. ADB RECAP OF FIRST HALF OF 2024 B. ADB ROLE AND CURRENT VS FUTURE SCOPE OF WORK i. State Mandates ii. Design Standards iii. Edmonds Planning Department Support Edmonds Architectural Design Board Agenda August 22, 2024 Page 1 C. QUESTIONS FOR PLANNING DEPT/CITY OF EDMONDS 9. ADB MEMBER COMMENTS 10. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Architectural Design Board Agenda August 22, 2024 Page 2 Architectural Design Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 08/22/2024 Approval of Previous meeting minutes Staff Lead: Kim Bayer Department: Architectural Design Board Prepared By: Michelle Martin Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Approve minutes from June 27th. Narrative Draft minutes from June 27th meeting attached. Attachments: ADB 06272024_draft Packet Pg. 3 CITY OF EDMONDS ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD Minutes of Regular Meeting June 27, 2024 Chair Bayer called the hybrid meeting of the Architectural Design Board to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Brackett Room at Edmonds City Hall, 121— 5d' Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington. Board Members Present Kim Bayer, Chair Maurine Jeude Corbitt Loch Steve Schmitz Todd Stein Board Members Absent Alexa Brooks, Vice Chair (excused) Alex Hutchinson APPROVAL OF AGENDA The agenda was approved as presented. AUDIENCE COMMENTS None APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 25, 2024 ADB Meeting Minutes Staff Present Mike Clugston, Planning Manager MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER SCHMITZ, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER LOCH, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. PUBLIC HEARINGS None NEW BUSINESS A. Review of the draft Community Design Element of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting June 27, 2024 Pagel of 3 Packet Pg. 4 Planning Manager Clugston introduced the topic of integrated placemaking as prepared by the consultant and contained in the attachment to the packet. There was some confusion about where product came from and how this approach fits in with the type of design guidance they have had in the past. Chair Bayer shared she had expressed frustration and disappointment to Mayor Rosen and Director McLaughlin about the high staff turnover they have had over the past several years. She thanked Planning Manager Clugston for being a constant with them but acknowledged he has been bearing heavy loads due to the lack of support. She noted it is hard for the Board to do its job with the lack of support and continuity. Board Member Loch thought there must have been some miscommunication with the work product the consultant was supposed to provide. He didn't think this looked anything like an urban design element of a comprehensive plan. It didn't make sense to him to even try to wordsmith it or tweak it. He recommended adjourning the meeting and allowing a redo of this at some point as determined by staff. He noted that an urban design element is not a requirement of the Growth Management Act, and the Comprehensive Plan can proceed with all of the other elements. Chair Bayer asked what ever happened to the comments the Board had made on the previous work product. Mr. Clugston was not sure. He had also thought they would have been looking at the elements they had looked at in April with their comments integrated. Board Member Jeude commented that this was neither clear nor objective and had nothing to do with what their mission supposedly is. It did not seem to fit Edmonds at all. She agreed that this was very disappointing and surprising. Board Member Stein asked what would happen if they don't adopt a new urban design element. Mr. Clugston explained that the existing element would stay in place until the new Comprehensive Plan is adopted. It is possible that there would just not be an urban design element. Board Member Loch noted that it is possible that the existing rules could be adopted as interim standards as a stopgap measure. Chair Bayer expressed support for that. The group debated how to proceed and questioned how this took such a different turn from what they had been working on. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER LOCH TO DECLINE TO ADVANCE THE WORK PRODUCT DELIVERED TO THE ADB; TO REMAIN SUPPORTIVE OF DEVELOPING AN URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT APPROPRIATE FOR EDMONDS; AND TO SUPPORT THE USE OF THE EXISTING REGULATIONS AS INTERIM REGULATIONS AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN CONTINUITY UNTIL THAT OTHER WORK CAN BE DONE. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER SCHMITZ AND PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0). ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Mr. Clugston noted that staff would try to find out what is going on with this and how to proceed. Chair Bayer again expressed great frustration and stated her intention to send another letter to Director McLaughlin, the Mayor, and Council expressing her concerns about the situation. Board Member Schmitz also Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting June 27, 2024 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 5 expressed disappointment in the process and said he would like to add his name to the letter. Board Member Loch concurred. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Architectural Design Board Meeting Minutes of Regular Meeting June 27, 2024 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 6