HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-09-11 Planning Board PacketAgenda
Edmonds Planning Board
REGULAR MEETING
BRACKETT ROOM
121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024, 7:00 PM
Edmonds Planning Board Agenda
September 11, 2024
Page 1
REMOTE MEETING INFORMATION:
Meeting Link:https://edmondswa-
gov.zoom.us/s/87322872194?pwd=WFdxTWJIQmxITG9LZkc3K0huS0l4QT09 Meeting ID: 873 2287
2194 Passcode:007978
This is a Hybrid meeting: The meeting can be attended in-person or on-line. The physcial
meeting location is at Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue N., 3rd floor Brackett Rooom
Or Telephone :US: +1 253 215 8782
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and
their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and
taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we
honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Previous Meeting Minutes
3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
4. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
For topics not scheduled for a public hearing. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Preliminary Waterfront Vision Design Concept
B. 2025-2030 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Draft Recommendation on Green Building Incentives
9. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT
10. PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
Edmonds Planning Board Agenda
September 11, 2024
Page 2
A. Extended Agenda
11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
12. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
13. ADJOURNMENT
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/11/2024
Previous Meeting Minutes
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning & Development
Prepared By: Michelle Martin
Background/History
July 24 Special Meeting Minutes had recommended edits to clarify for transcription.
Staff Recommendation
1. Review and approve meeting minutes from August 28th regular meeting.
2. Clarify edits from July 24 Special meeting minute changes.
Narrative
August 28th meeting minutes attached.
July 24 special 6pm meeting minutes attached.
Attachments:
PB 08282024_draft
PB 07242024 Special Mtg
2.A
Packet Pg. 3
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
August 28, 2024 Page 1 of 3
DRAFT
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of Hybrid Meeting
August 28, 2024
Vice Chair Golembiewski called the hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:01 p.m. at
Edmonds City Hall and on Zoom.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
The Land Acknowledgement was read by Board Member Hankins.
Board Members Present
Lauren Golembiewski, Vice Chair
Judi Gladstone
Lee Hankins
Nick Maxwell
Steven Li
Isaac Fontin, Student Rep.
Board Members Absent
Jeremy Mitchell, Chair (excused)
Susanna Martini
Staff Present
Mike Clugston, Acting Planning Manager
Amber Brokenshire, Associate Planner
A. Student Representative to Planning Board
Isaac Fortin was introduced to the Board as a candidate for the student representative position.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER LI, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, TO
APPROVE ISAAC FONTIN AS THE PLANNING BOARD STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. JULY 24, 2024 SPECIAL MEETING (6:00 P.M.) MINUTES
This item was continued to the next meeting so amendments can be made.
B. JULY 24, 2024 REGULAR MEETING (7:00 P.M.) MINUTES
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
MAXWELL, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JULY 24, 2024 REGULAR MEETING (7:00
2.A.a
Packet Pg. 4
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
B
0
8
2
8
2
0
2
4
_
d
r
a
f
t
(
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
August 28, 2024 Page 2 of 3
P.M.) AS PRESENTED. MOTION PASSED (5-0) WITH VICE CHAIR GOLEMBIEWSKI
ABSTAINING.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
Vice Chair Golembiewski requested the addition of a discussion about a Green Building Incentives memo under
Unfinished Business.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER HANKINS, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER LI, TO
APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION PASSED (5-0) WITH BOARD MEMBER
GLADSTONE ABSTAINING.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
None
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Public hearing on code amendments to update land use permit processes per SB 5290 and HB 1105
(AMD2024-0002)
Associate Planner Amber Brokenshire made the staff presentation giving an overview of Senate Bill 5290,
streamlining measures, and implementation of Substitute House Bill 1105. The group debated the proposed
amendments including permit review timeline requirements, the annual performance report, and the refund
process language.
Public Testimony: None
The public hearing was closed at 7:47 p.m.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
GLADSTONE, TO RECOMMEND THE DRAFT CODE FOR APPROVAL WITH THE CAVEAT
THAT IF STAFF FINDS THEY CAN REMOVE THE LANGUAGE REGARDING REFUNDS,
THAT IT BE REMOVED. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Green Building Incentives Memo
Vice Chair Golembiewski read the memo into the record. Board members brought up details they would like
to add or clarify to the memo. Board Member Maxwell and Board Member Gladstone will work on some
amendments to the memo and bring it back to the next meeting.
2.A.a
Packet Pg. 5
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
B
0
8
2
8
2
0
2
4
_
d
r
a
f
t
(
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Planning Board Meeting Minutes
August 28, 2024 Page 3 of 3
PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA
September 11 – Transportation; Waterfront Vision; Introduction to the Capital Improvement Program/Capital
Facilities Plan. There will be a special meeting starting at 6:00 p.m.
There was some discussion about when the draft EIS will be issued given recent staff changes and what the
Board’s involvement with that will be like going forward. The group reviewed other topics to be addressed
throughout the rest of year.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Board Member Hankins gave a report on the last meeting of the Economic Development Commission. The
EDC discussed tax increment financing and if it can be used to potentially fund a Highway 99 Landmark-area
project. They also were introduced to a software application called Business Booster 2.0 intended to assist
people who want to open businesses in the area.
Board Member Hankins requested that going forward staff provide a link to slides that are used in meetings.
The Board expressed appreciation to Planning Manager Clugston for his perseverance in light of significant
staffing challenges and encouraged him to maintain communication with the Board about issues as they come
up.
Board Member Gladstone was pleased to have a student representative again.
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
Vice Chair Golembiewski thanked everyone for being patient with her as she chaired the meeting tonight.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
2.A.a
Packet Pg. 6
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
B
0
8
2
8
2
0
2
4
_
d
r
a
f
t
(
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Planning Board Special Meeting Minutes
July 24, 2024 Page 1 of 3
DRAFT
CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD
Minutes of Special Meeting
July 24, 2024
Chair Mitchell called the special hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 6:00 p.m. at
Edmonds City Hall and on Zoom.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
The Land Acknowledgement was read by Board Member Li.
Board Members Present
Jeremy Mitchell, Chair
Judi Gladstone
Lee Hankins
Nick Maxwell
Steven Li
Board Members Absent
Lauren Golembiewski (excused)
Susanna Martini
Staff Present
Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Director
Navyusha Pentakota, Urban Design Planner
ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA
THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Land Use Goals/Policies and Housing Elements
Subcommittee chairs summarized the subcommittees’ comments and recommendations on the draft Land Use
Goals and the Housing Element. Both groups expressed a desire to restructure the existing documents; condense
the number of goals; and clarify goals, policies, and actions/missions. Kirkland was mentioned as an
understandable model for goals and policies for land use.
A concern was raised about the focus on low income and affordable housing to the exclusion of every other
type of home in Edmonds without addressing existing neighborhoods. There was a recommendation to retain
material from the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element about single-family residential neighborhoods.
2.A.b
Packet Pg. 7
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
B
0
7
2
4
2
0
2
4
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
t
g
(
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Planning Board Special Meeting Minutes
July 24, 2024 Page 2 of 3
Staff explained that there are no more single-family residential neighborhoods because of state legislation. There
was a recommendation to look to see how Kirkland addressed this. It was noted that new terms would be needed
to discuss this topic.
Board members also noted that some items should be reconsidered which are out of the City’s purview. They
pointed out a need to strengthen the focus on developing around centers and hubs. Staff invited the
subcommittees to present their recommendations in a joint City Council/Planning Board meeting on August 6.
There was discussion about the process going forward.
Land Use Goals/Policies
The group debated land use goals and policies related to equity.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
GLADSTONE, TO REQUEST THE “TOP BOX” REGARDING EQUITY BECOME THE LAND
USE POLICY AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, UNDERSTANDING THEY ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT
THE GROWTH IN HUBS AND CENTERS.
Goals and policies promote equity by promoting development in underserved neighborhoods where
infrastructure and public resources (for example, parks, trails, libraries, community centers,
sidewalks, storm water systems, tec.) are currently weaker than they are in other places.
This includes not adding more infrastructure and public assets where they are already plentiful and
strong. For example, not adding more public facilities and resources to Downtown or the Creative
District.
Equity means having Edmonds work as well for every Edmonds resident as it does for everyone else.
This policy includes dropping policies LU-1.1, LU-3.1, LU-3.2, LU-5.1.
There was a question if the focus on equity was the best way to get the results they want. How can they invest
in all the neighborhoods in a thoughtful way in order to benefit the entire city? Staff brought up the importance
of Edmonds’ two activity centers in the GMA framework. Policies that seem in conflict with each other were
discussed. There was discussion about having a holistic approach to certain policies rather than just geographic.
BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE MADE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT THAT THE MOTION
INCLUDE REVISING THE POLICIES LISTED INSTEAD OF DROPPING THEM (EXCEPT LU-
3.1).
BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE MADE ANOTHER FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO MODIFY
THE FIRST SENTENCE TO SAY, “GOALS AND POLICIES PROMOTE EQUITY BY
PROMOTING INVESTING IN DEVELOPMENT IN UNDERSERVED . . .”
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0) TO APPROVE THE MOTION AS AMENDED.
Sexually Oriented Businesses:
2.A.b
Packet Pg. 8
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
B
0
7
2
4
2
0
2
4
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
t
g
(
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Planning Board Special Meeting Minutes
July 24, 2024 Page 3 of 3
It was recommended that this goal be removed since it is not required.
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
GLADSTONE, THAT THE GOAL FOR SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES BE REMOVED.
MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0).
Human/Pedestrian-scaled and public-transportation-oriented structures and infrastructure:
MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER
GLADSTONE, THAT HUMAN/PEDESTRIAN-SCALED AND PUBLIC-TRANSPORTATION-
ORIENTED STRUCTURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE BE A GOAL FOR ALL OF EDMONDS.
HUMAN SCALED STRUCTURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDE WALKABILITY,
HUMAN SCALED BUILDING HEIGHTS, GROUND-FLOOR PEDESTRIAN ENGAGEMENT,
MIXED USE AND LIVE/WORK HOUSING CHOICES, AND MINIMIZING TRAFFIC, NOISE,
WATER POLLUTION, AIR POLLUTION, AND NIGHTTIME LIGHT POLLUTION.
Director McLaughlin explained that live/work can be problematic in areas where they want to promote ground
level commercial or retail. It may not be appropriate in the core of downtown. Board members felt that all the
centers and hubs should have the same standard as what is in downtown.
THE MOTION WAS TABLED DUE TO LACK OF TIME.
PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
None
PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS
None
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 7:03 p.m.
2.A.b
Packet Pg. 9
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
B
0
7
2
4
2
0
2
4
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
M
t
g
(
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/11/2024
Preliminary Waterfront Vision Design Concept
Staff Lead: Navyusha Pentakota
Department: Planning & Development
Prepared By: Navyusha Pentakota
Background/History
The Edmonds waterfront is one of the city's defining features, stretching more than a mile along the
Puget Sound coast. This unique area contributes to the city's appeal and reflects its history and therefore
is a key area of focus for planning and development.
The 1995 Comprehensive Plan introduced a strategic approach for future development along the
waterfront by establishing the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. This planning area, which has
remained a key component of all subsequent Comprehensive Plans, identified many goals and policies
for maintaining, enhancing, and better connecting the Downtown and Waterfront areas.
One of those initial policies was to “[e]stablish a Point Edwards multimodal transportation center which
provides convenient transportation connects for bus, ferry, rail, auto and bicycle riders and makes
Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal should be planned
to reduce negative impacts to downtown Edmonds while providing the community with unique
transportation resources and an economic stimulus for the larger community.” Over the next decade, the
Edmonds Crossing project took shape following extensive work by local, regional and federal partners
with the intent to create that multimodal transportation hub at the south end of the waterfront area
adjacent to the Point Edwards site.
For a variety of reasons, the project was not realized, and now the Washington State Ferries’ long-range
plan no longer recognizes Edmonds Crossing and all previously dedicated funding for the project has
been reallocated. The project’s effective cancellation greatly impacts future land use within the
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center, the restoration and enhancement of Edmonds Marsh, and
transportation planning. As a result, the City needed to untangle Edmonds Crossing from the
Comprehensive Plan during this periodic update and refine the approach to future development in the
waterfront area.
To that end, a Waterfront Issues Study was conducted in 2022 as an initial step to identify needs and
opportunities for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update (Attachment 1). MAKERS architecture and urban
design, with Leland Consulting and The Watershed Company, conducted a comprehensive review of
existing plans and studies, engaged in discussions with City staff, led an online open house and webinar,
and interviewed stakeholder groups to understand the waterfront’s current context, issues, and
opportunities. The study's recommendations, which were presented to City Council, highlighted the
need to create a new vision for the waterfront. It emphasizes that as part of the 2024 Comprehensive
Plan update, the City should engage the public in crafting an updated vision for the
Downtown/Waterfront area. This vision should reflect the community’s desires concerning land use and
appeal while considering market realities and trends. Special attention should be given to the future use
7.A
Packet Pg. 10
of the Unocal Property and planning for sea level rise.
Staff Recommendation
No action is required. Staff will provide an overview of the preliminary design concept (Attachment 2)
and requests the Board's initial feedback to guide additional work on the project.
Narrative
In response to the Waterfront Study and Council recommendations, the City initiated a high-level review
of the planning area to assess the implications for the 2024-2044 Comprehensive Plan update. This
review considered major properties, infrastructure, and environmental factors within the study area.
Key recommendations from the 2022 Waterfront Study include:
· Creating a new vision for the waterfront.
· Recognizing and supporting the ferry terminal's current location.
· Prioritizing the restoration of Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek.
· Planning for improved emergency management of the waterfront.
Similar to Edmonds Crossing, the status of several other ongoing projects has shifted over the years
(cleanup of the Unocal property, bulkhead restoration, BNSF and Sound Transit’s long-range planning,
Marina Beach Park improvements), which could influence the future development in the area.
In 2024, City staff reached out to the public to gather opinions on the Waterfront Study
recommendations, seeking to understand which aspects still resonate with the community and remain
relevant in today’s context. A design charette was conducted, during which community members were
asked specific questions about the waterfront goals outlined in the existing Comprehensive Plan.
Discussions centered around which ideas should be carried forward and which might need to be
rethought.
During this session, the public participated in group design exercises facilitated by staff members, where
they shared ideas and concerns on three main topics: future-forward urban design, marsh integration,
and emergency access planning. It was a fun and interactive session where participants explored
questions such as:
“What do you envision the 'vibe' of the Waterfront area to be?"
"What activities should be available?"
"How should we connect the Waterfront to Downtown via Main St. and Dayton?"
"How should parking be managed?"
"How can we integrate the Marsh into the larger pedestrian network?"
"How can we meet the needs of emergency services?"
A summary of the design charette, highlighting key themes, was used to develop a preliminary concept
for the waterfront area. Staff and consultants applied their expertise to translate the community's ideas
into a graphic concept, which was presented back to the community in June 2024 for feedback. The
concept was largely well-received, though concerns were raised regarding the hotel proposal, parking,
and salmon restoration. All community responses can be reviewed here on City's web page -
https://www.edmondswa.gov/cms/One.aspx?portalId=16495016&pageId=20153021. Revisions were
made to the draft concept based on the feedback.
Following additional feedback from the Planning Board and other local stakeholders, a set of goals and
policies that support the implementation of the concept will be incorporate into the updated
Comprehensive Plan, guiding future development and regulation in the waterfront area.
Attachments:
7.A
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment 1 - Edmonds Waterfront Study Key Findings and Recommendations
Attachment 2 - Waterfront Preliminary Concept
7.A
Packet Pg. 12
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 1
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study
Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
July 14, 2022
Executive Summary
The purpose of this project was to identify strategic updates and high-level recommendations to be
considered in the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan update to reflect new information about
waterfront uses, needs, and issues. The Edmonds Crossing project, which proposed to relocate the
Edmonds ferry terminal to the south end of the waterfront, is not recognized in the Washington State
Ferries 2040 Long Range Plan and the Washington State Department of Transportation has made no
recent efforts to advance it. The City’s long-range planning efforts have been relying upon the
Edmonds Crossing project for decades; the Comprehensive Plan currently includes 30 references and
eight pages devoted to the project.
Figure 1 - Overview of key properties and projects in the Edmonds waterfront study area (MAKERS)
The Edmonds Crossing project’s effective cancellation also impacts future ownership and uses of key
properties, restoration and enhancement of the Edmonds Marsh, transportation planning, and several
other infrastructure and planning issues. shows the general relationship between key sites, features,
and projects in the waterfront study area.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 13
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 2
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
This Waterfront Issues Project is intended to be the initial step in identifying needs and opportunities
to incorporate into the Comprehensive Plan for the 2024 update. MAKERS architecture and urban
design, with the help of Leland Consulting and The Watershed Company, conducted a thorough
review of existing plans and studies, held numerous conversations with City staff, led an online open
house/webinar with 37 participants, and interviewed nine stakeholder groups to gain a better
understanding of the waterfront’s current context, issues, and opportunities. The findings are
organized by sections 1-11 pertaining to each issue or project.
Based on the project team’s findings and discussions, the top preliminary recommendations in this
memo include:
Create a new vision for the waterfront (Recommendation 11.A). Addressing the effective
cancellation of Edmonds Crossing is not as simple as deleting its name from the
Comprehensive Plan, because the plan heavily relies upon the project for land use
assumptions and resolving the at-grade railroad crossing conflicts. As part of the 2024
Comprehensive Plan update, the City should engage the public to craft an updated vision for
the Downtown Waterfront area. The vision should clearly articulate the community’s desires
around land use and character within the framework of market realities and trends. The future
use of the Unocal Property and planning for sea level rise should be special considerations in
the visioning. See related Recommendations 1.B, 2.A, 5.A, and 3.C.
Recognize and support the Edmonds ferry terminal’s current location (Recommendation
2.A). Develop new and more specific land use and transportation policies that recognize the
existing ferry terminal and guide the City’s approach to planning around the terminal.
Prioritize Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration (Recommendation 4.A-B).
Continue planning and funding of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project,
including refined cost estimates, design, and flood mitigation planning. If the Unocal Property
is acquired by the City, update the design of Willow Creek to optimize ecological outcomes.
Plan for improved emergency management of the waterfront (Recommendation 7.C).
Street closures due to train crossings are a continued problem, and emergency service west of
the tracks remains at risk of disruption. In coordination with other jurisdictions, this issue
requires further study and possible improvements involving capital facilities investments or
new transportation infrastructure. Emergency management planning must be conducted
collaboratively with organizations such as the Port of Edmonds, BNSF Railway, Washington
State Ferries, Snohomish County, and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1.
Several technical studies are recommended to support comprehensive planning and economic
development. Refer to the recommendation number to find information on each study.
Study Recommendation Number
Ferry traffic study 2.B
Unocal Property real estate appraisal 3.A
Federal Railroad Administration quiet zone application 6.B
Hotel feasibility study 11.B
Comprehensive parking study of the Downtown Waterfront area 11.H
Figure 2 – List of recommended studies
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 14
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 3
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Introduction
Project Purpose
The Edmonds Crossing project, which proposed to relocate the Edmonds ferry terminal to the south
end of the waterfront, is no longer active. The City’s long-range planning efforts have been relying
upon the Edmonds Crossing project for decades. This change affects future ownership and uses of key
properties; it also relates to restoration and enhancement of the Edmonds Marsh. The City undertook
this project as a first step in examining the implications of this change at a fairly high level for the
purpose of updating the Comprehensive Plan for the 2024-2044 planning period. This project also
considered other major properties, infrastructure, and environmental elements in the study area.
Memo Overview
This memo contains the key findings, relevant Comprehensive Plan Policies, and preliminary
recommendations for the 11 waterfront issues studied:
Section 1 – The status of Edmonds Crossing ......................................................................................... 4
Section 2 – Ferry operations on the Edmonds-Kingston route ..................................................... 12
Section 3 – Unocal Property cleanup, property rights, and future land use ............................ 15
Section 4 – Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration efforts ............................................. 19
Section 5 – Flooding and sea level rise potential impacts .............................................................. 24
Section 6 – Railroad double-tracking project impacts and planning considerations ........... 28
Section 7 – Waterfront emergency access next steps ...................................................................... 30
Section 8 – Edmonds Station access and improvements ............................................................... 35
Section 9 – Bus service improvements and light rail connections .............................................. 36
Section 10 – Port of Edmonds projects and properties ................................................................... 39
Section 11 – Land use and economic development opportunities ............................................ 40
Section 12 – Sources ..................................................................................................................................... 47
The key findings and facts in this memo were developed from the project’s background research and
public outreach efforts. Many of the facts are pulled from existing public documents and studies and
from stakeholder interviews conducted with property owners, transportation agencies, and
environmental interests. Stakeholders interviewed were the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) and Washington State Ferries (WSF), Sound Transit, Community Transit, BNSF
Railway, Port of Edmonds, Tulalip Tribes, Save Our Marsh, JSH Properties, and Lund Consulting
representing Chevron/Unocal.
Following each set of findings, the consultant team’s recommendations to address the major issues
are listed. Most recommendations relate to updating the Comprehensive Plan, while some
recommendations are for City-led actions and studies.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 15
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 4
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 1 – Edmonds Crossing
Key Findings
The Edmonds Crossing project originated in the 1990s when Washington State Ferries (WSF) proposed
a vehicle loading bridge over the Main Street railroad crossing. The City objected to that design, and a
concept for a new ferry terminal on the south part of the waterfront was developed as an alternative.
It would be located on the Unocal Property adjacent to the Edmonds Marsh (see Section 3) and on
land occupied by the Port of Edmonds and Marina Beach Park.
Conceptually, major elements of the Edmonds Crossing project would consist of a three-slip ferry
dock, large vehicle holding areas, surface and structured parking, a new/relocated Edmonds Station
and bus transit center, pedestrian access across the railroad tracks, daylighting of Willow Creek, and
stormwater treatment. The project’s most advanced milestone was a Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) published in 2004.
Figure 3 - Edmonds Crossing "preferred alternative" from the 2004 FEIS
Today, the Edmonds Crossing project, as originally envisioned and planned for, is effectively cancelled
with no signs of life. This is evidenced by:
• Edmonds Crossing has had no major plans, designs, cost estimates, or other project
documentation published since the FEIS was released nearly 20 years ago
• The Edmonds Crossing project is not included in the WSF 2040 Long Range Plan (published
2019)
• WSDOT has no staff assigned to work on the project
• WSDOT has no funding for the project, nor did the Legislature include the project in its major
2022-2038 transportation funding package (known as Move Ahead Washington)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 5
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
• WSDOT has not identified any further transportation need for the Unocal Property beyond the
agency’s original intent to use the property for Edmonds Crossing, and the Legislature’s
official stance is that the City of Edmonds should be able to purchase the Unocal Property for
the purpose of rehabilitating near-shore habitat for salmon (read more in Section 3)
The WSF Long Range Plan says, “Edmonds multimodal terminal improvements are proposed in the
long term.” WSF staff have confirmed these improvements are undefined, they do not include the
Edmonds Crossing project, and no alternative terminal relocation schemes are planned. The scope of
the “multimodal terminal improvements” will be determined later in a community planning process.
City staff report that ferry traffic issues associated with the existing terminal remain unresolved.
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Excerpts, Policies and Recommendations
Addressing the effective cancellation of Edmonds Crossing is not a simple task. The Land Use Element
heavily relies upon the project for assumptions and planned actions in the Downtown/Waterfront
Activity Center, and it has no policies on the existing ferry terminal. Therefore, each recommendation
of Section 1 carefully considers how Edmonds Crossing should be unwrapped from the
Comprehensive Plan.
Unlike the other sections of this memo, here each relevant Comprehensive Plan passage is listed and
immediately followed by an associated recommendation. Some passages are abbreviated for brevity,
and the full Comprehensive Plan should be referred to for complete context. See Section 2 on Ferry
Service for related recommendations.
Land Use Element
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Plan Context (page 44): A number of public plans and projects have
been taking shape in recent years, and these could have a profound impact on the future of the city’s
downtown/waterfront area. Some of these ongoing activities include…
• Transportation planning to accommodate ferry traffic, including options for a reservation system,
additional parking for ferry users, and the possible Edmonds Crossing multimodal project. The latter project
would move the existing ferry terminal at the base of Main Street to a new multimodal transportation center
at Pt. Edwards.
Recommendation 1.A. Update the bullet point to reference the existing Edmonds ferry terminal
and remove reference to Edmonds Crossing. Considering adding a reference to WSF’s future
undefined multimodal terminal improvements at the existing ferry terminal, potential changes to
holding lanes, and the planned three-boat service (see Section 2 for additional ferry information
and recommendations).
Downtown/Waterfront Vision (page 44). Taken together, the goals and policies for the
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center present a vision for Edmonds downtown/waterfront. By actively
pursuing the ferry terminal’s relocation, the City has set upon an ambitious and exciting course. It is a course
that holds promise for the downtown/waterfront, but it is one that will require concerted action by the
entire community, including local, state and federal public officials, business groups and citizens. While the
challenges presented in this effort are substantial, the possible rewards are even greater, for with its existing
physical assets, future opportunities and the energy of its citizens, Edmonds has the potential to create one
of the region’s most attractive and vital city centers in the midst of a magnificent shoreline setting.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 6
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Recommendation 1.B. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference and update this Downtown
Waterfront vision in a community engagement process as part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan
update. Since the Edmonds Crossing project is inactive, the updated vision should clearly
articulate the community’s desires for the area and reorient the community’s desires for how the
existing ferry terminal is integrated into the Downtown Waterfront. For further guidance on
updating the vision, please see related Recommendations 3.C. and 11.A.
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center (page 45). Components of the overall vision for the
downtown/waterfront area include:
• The Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center provides convenient transportation
connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto and bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in
the regional transportation system. The new terminal reduces negative impacts to downtown
Edmonds while still providing a link between the terminal and downtown Edmonds. The project
provides the community with varied transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the
larger community.
• Downtown is extended westward and connected to the shoreline by positive mixed-use
development as well as by convenient pedestrian routes. Redevelopment of the holding lanes and
SR-104 is pursued after the ferry terminal relocates to Point Edwards.
Recommendation 1.C. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference and update the Downtown
Waterfront vision per Recommendation 1.B. The update should consider that “negative impacts to
downtown Edmonds” are currently undefined and possibly unresolved by the continuation of
ferry operations in the current configuration. See also Recommendation 2.B for a ferry traffic study.
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Goal B (page 46). B.1 Future development along the waterfront
should support the continuation and compatible design of three regional facilities: Edmonds Crossing at Pt.
Edwards; the Port of Edmonds; and the regional parks, beaches and walkways making up the public
shoreline.
Recommendation 1.D. Replace the Edmonds Crossing reference with the existing Edmonds ferry
terminal. Clearly define what “compatible design” means for the existing terminal or remove that
from the goal. See also Recommendation 2.B for a ferry traffic study.
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Goal C (page 47). Continue to plan for and implement the Edmonds
Crossing multimodal transportation center at Point Edwards – pursuing the design, permitting, land
acquisition and development of the project, as resources allow. The completion of Edmonds Crossing will
help address the competing needs of three regional facilities (transportation, parks and open space –
including the Edmonds Marsh, and the Port of Edmonds) while providing opportunities for redevelopment
and linkage between downtown Edmonds and its waterfront.
C.1 Utilize the Point Edwards site to its best community and regional potential by developing a
multimodal transit center with compatible development in the surrounding area. In addition to the
regional benefits arising from its multi modal transportation function, an essential community
benefit is in removing intrusive ferry traffic from the core area which serves to visually and
physically separate downtown from the waterfront.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 7
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
C.2 When feasible, establish a Point Edwards multimodal transportation center which provides
convenient transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto, pedestrians and bicycle riders and
makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal
should be planned to reduce negative impacts to downtown Edmonds – such as grade
separation/safety concerns and conflicts with other regional facilities – while providing the
community with unique transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger
community.
C.3 Extend Downtown westward and connect it to the shoreline by encouraging mixed-use
development and pedestrian-oriented amenities and streetscape improvements, particularly along
Dayton and Main Streets. Development in this area should draw on historical design elements
found in the historic center of Edmonds to ensure an architectural tie throughout the Downtown
Area. Pursue redevelopment of SR-104 and the existing holding lanes once the ferry terminal
moves to Point Edwards.
C.4 Improve traffic conditions by removing ferry traffic impacts from the downtown core.
Recommendation 1.E. Revise goal C and subgoals C.1, C2., and C.4 to acknowledge the
continued existence of the ferry terminal in its current location. The issues of Downtown ferry
traffic, the railroad crossings, and multimodal transportation are addressed in other
recommendations (respectively, see Sections 2, 6-7, and 8-9). Most of subgoal C.3 could potentially
be retained as a higher-level Downtown/Waterfront Area goal since it does not necessarily rely
upon Edmonds Crossing to be achieved.
An updated Downtown Waterfront vision is needed per Recommendations 1.B, 3.C, and 11.A. To
replace subgoal C.4, the updated visioning process should evaluate the extent of ferry traffic
impacts on the downtown core and be addressed by the vision (see Recommendation 2.B
regarding a ferry traffic study).
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Goal H (page 49). H.1 Improve and encourage economic
development opportunities by providing space for local businesses and cottage industries and undertaking
supporting public improvement projects. Of particular significance is the enhancement of economic
development opportunities resulting from the Edmonds Crossing project and the enhancement of
Edmonds as an arts and water-oriented destination.
Recommendation 1.F. Update this goal to explain how the “enhancement of Edmonds as an arts
and water-oriented destination” will occur with the existing ferry terminal in place.
Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Multi-modal Transportation (page 49). Primary goals of the City’s
Downtown Waterfront Plan include integrating the downtown core with the waterfront, improving
pedestrian access and traffic circulation, and encouraging mixed-use development. Current conditions limit
the city's ability to achieve these plan goals by making it difficult to move between the two areas, thereby
minimizing the value of the shoreline as a public resource and amenity while adversely affecting the
potential for redevelopment, including greater public use.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 19
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 8
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Figure 15: Integration of the Remaining Ferry Pier Structure into Surrounding Parks (page 49).
Recommendation 1.G. Update the Multi-modal Transportation section to acknowledge the
existing ferry terminal and update the Downtown Waterfront Vision. See related
Recommendations 2.A, 11.A, and 11.G. Consider removing Figure 15 since there are no active
plans to alter the ferry terminal or pier structures.
Edmonds Crossing subsection (pages 49-55).
The full text of these pages is not shown for brevity.
Recommendation 1.H. Remove the multi-page Edmonds Crossing subsection. Relocate some of
the text from pages 49-55 which remains relevant, as follows.
2015 Alternatives Analysis (page 52) The project remains the City’s stated preference to resolve the
many conflicts created by the at-grade railroad crossings at Dayton and Main Streets.
Recommendation 1.I. In the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use
Element and in the Transportation Element, integrate a new preference to resolve the at-grade
railroad crossing conflicts. See Sections 6 and 7 for further information and recommendations.
Also, update the Downtown Waterfront vision per Recommendations 1.B and 11.A.
Short Term Actions (page 53). 3. Improve the existing downtown rail station between Dayton and Main
Streets in order to better accommodate inter-city passenger and commuter rail service, including
provisions for bus and commuter traffic as well as pedestrian connections to the waterfront and
downtown. During the short term planning period, evaluate the feasibility and benefits of retaining a
commuter rail and transit presence downtown after the construction of Edmonds Crossing.
Recommendation 1.J. In the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use
Element and in the Transportation Element, relocate Short Term Action #3 and integrate the
known Edmonds Station access improvements that are planned by Sound Transit (see Section
8). Also update Short Term Action #3 to include bus transit connections to light rail stations
(see Recommendation 9.B).
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 20
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 9
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Short Term Actions (page 53) 4. Plan for future joint public/private development of the area between
SR-104 and the railroad tracks. Planning activities could potentially include infrastructure planning,
property acquisition, parking management, development incentives and guidelines or modifications to
land use regulations (such as zoning or master planning). Although Amtrak and commuter rail service
will be included as a part of the Edmonds Crossing project, the City and transit service providers should
examine whether a commuter rail stop can be retained between Dayton and Main Streets in order to
provide improved service and stimulate potential redevelopment of the surrounding area.
Recommendation 1.K. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference. As part of the Downtown
Waterfront vision update (see Recommendations 1.B and 11.A), the community’s desires for
the area between SR-104 and the railroad tracks should be determined and if a joint
public/private development of this area is still relevant. See Section 3 for information and
recommendations for the Unocal Property, and Section 11 for details on the current zoning
and status of major properties like Harbor Square and Salish Crossing. See Recommendation
11.H regarding a parking study.
Short Term Actions (page 53)
5. Upgrade secondary downtown streets for pedestrians. Implement the city’s public urban design plan
and street tree plan while expanding public amenities and streetscape improvements in areas where
these do not already exist. These improvements are particularly needed along Main and Dayton Streets
in the area between downtown and the waterfront in order to improve pedestrian connections
between downtown and the waterfront area. Pedestrian improvements should be combined with
traffic improvement projects where applicable.
6. Continue to promote sustainable shoreline management and public access to the city’s beaches,
parks, and walkways.
7. Continue implementing a continuous shoreline walkway (boardwalk/esplanade) from Brackett’s
Landing North to Point Edwards. Work with the Port of Edmonds to integrate recreation and marina
functions into the long term plan.
9. Encourage a variety of housing to be developed as part of new development and redevelopment of
downtown properties. Housing should be provided to serve a diverse community, including single
family homes, multi family apartments and condominiums, housing as part of mixed use developments,
and housing connected with live/work developments that could also encourage an arts-oriented
community in the downtown area. A special focus for arts-supporting live/work arrangements could be
in the corridor and nearby residential areas linking downtown with the Edmonds Center for the Arts.
11. Develop “gateways” at key entrances to the downtown area which enhance the identity and sense
of place for downtown. Gateways should signal that visitors are entering downtown Edmonds, and
should include elements such as public art, landscaping, signage and directional (“way-finding”) aids.
Recommendation 1.L. The above short term actions are relevant without the Edmonds
Crossing project and could be integrated elsewhere in the Downtown/Waterfront Activity
Center section of the Land Use Element, the Housing Element, and the Community Culture &
Urban Design Element.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 21
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 10
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Long Term Actions (page 54)
3. Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port development.
4. Continue to protect and enhance existing wetlands and continue to develop supporting non-
intrusive interpretive trails and exhibits to help educate local citizens and visitors about Edmonds’
unique ecosystems and natural and cultural history.
5. Continue development of a “necklace” of shoreline parks with improvements, focusing on missing
links in the park and walkway system. Retain and expand existing parks, providing linkages whenever
property acquisitions or easements become available for public use.
6. Encourage the development of centralized parking facilities as part of redevelopment projects. Under
the right circumstances, these types of facilities can provide an efficient mechanism for consolidating
expensive parking improvements while freeing up land for more intensive and desirable uses that
support local housing, commercial, and pedestrian activities. Public/private partnerships should be
explored when the opportunity arises, both in private and public projects (e.g. the commuter rail station
downtown). Centralized parking facilities could be built as part of a master-planned mixed-use
development.
8. Redevelop the area from the east side of SR-104 to the railroad tracks, from Harbor Square to Main
Street, according to a mixed use master plan. This area could provide a significant opportunity for
public/private partnerships. Under the right circumstances, consolidated parking or a
pedestrian/bicycle crossing to the waterfront could be possible as part of a redevelopment project.
Every opportunity should be taken to improve the pedestrian streetscape in this area in order to
encourage pedestrian activity and linkages between downtown and the waterfront. Uses developed
along public streets should support pedestrian and bicycle activity and include amenities such as street
trees, street furniture, flowers and mini parks. Main and Dayton Streets should receive special attention
for public art or art integrated into private developments to reinforce the visual arts theme for
downtown. Redevelopment of this area should also take advantage of the ability to reconfigure and
remove the ferry holding lanes paralleling SR-104 once the Edmonds Crossing project is developed.
10. New development and redevelopment in the downtown waterfront area should be designed to
meet overall design objectives and the intent of the various “districts” described for the downtown area.
Recommendation 1.M. The above long term actions are relevant without the Edmonds
Crossing project and could be integrated elsewhere in the Downtown/Waterfront Activity
Center section of the Land Use Element and in the Transportation Element. An updated
Downtown Waterfront vison, with community desires about development and
redevelopment is need, per Recommendations 1.B, 1.K, and 11.A.
See also Section 4 regarding wetlands and Edmonds Marsh, and Recommendations 11.G and
11.H regarding the waterfront walkway and waterfront parking.
Master Plan Development planning designation (page 57) The waterfront area south of Olympic Beach,
including the Port of Edmonds and the Point Edwards and multi modal developments. This area is
recognized by master plans for the Port of Edmonds, Point Edwards, and the Edmonds Crossing project as
described in an FEIS issued on November 10, 2004. These areas are also developed consistent with the City's
Shoreline Master Program, as it applies.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 22
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 11
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Recommendation 1.N. Update this this description of the Master Plan Development designation
based on the outcome of recommended visioning process for the downtown waterfront and
Unocal Property (see the recommendations in Section 3).
Transportation Element
Policy 6.9 (page 230) Locate and design a multi-modal transportation center and terminal to serve the city’s
needs with the following elements:
• A ferry terminal that meets the operational requirements to accommodate forecast ridership
demand and that provides proper separation of automobile, bicycle and walk-on passenger
loading;
• A train station that meets intercity passenger service and commuter rail loading requirements, and
provides the requisite amenities such as waiting areas, storage and bicycle lockers;
• A transit center with connections to major regional destinations;
• A linkage between stations/terminals that meets the operational and safety requirements of each
mode, including a link between the multi-modal station terminal to the business/commerce center
in downtown Edmonds;
• Safety features that include better separation between train traffic and other modes of travel,
particularly vehicle and passenger ferry traffic as well as the general public; and
• Overall facility design that minimizes the impact to the natural environment, in particular the
adjacent marshes.
Recommendation 1.O. Edit this policy with the assumption that the City is recognizing and
supporting the ferry terminal in its existing location. Incorporate or update policies elsewhere in
the plan that refer to all of these objectives. See Recommendation 2.A regarding ferry facilities,
Section 8 regarding train service, Section 9 regarding bus service, Section 7 regarding separation
between train traffic and other modes of travel, and Section 4 regarding the Edmonds Marsh.
Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Facility (page 299) The City is also a partner in the Edmonds Crossing
multimodal ferry, bus, and rail facility. Sound Transit is planning to relocate Edmonds station as part of the
larger Edmonds Crossing Multimodal project being led by WSDOT. While there is no funding for this
relocation, the multimodal facility would be an important transit hub for the city.
Recommendation 1.P. Remove the Edmonds Crossing subsection under the “transit” heading.
Acknowledge the existing ferry terminal through the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the
other recommendations of Sections 1 and 2.
Interjurisdictional Coordination (page 318) Coordinate with WSDOT and the FHWA to move forward with
the Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Project.
Recommendation 1.Q. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference. Coordinate with WSDOT on
other ferry terminal and traffic improvements per the recommendations of Section 2.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 12
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 2 – Ferry Service
Key Findings
The Edmonds Ferry Terminal is located at the end of Main Street. Vehicle and foot passenger traffic to
and from ferries must cross over railroad tracks at the end of the terminal pier.
During regular two-boat service, Edmonds/Kingston ferry route has 25 daily round trips running
approximately every 45 minutes (depending on time of day). In 2021, the route carried approximately
3.5 million passengers, which included 1.9 million vehicles. This is up from 2020 but still 15% below
pre-pandemic volumes. The route has recently operated with only a single vessel due to ongoing
pandemic and crew shortage impacts.
Figure 4 - Summary of planned Improvements to the Edmonds/Kingston route (Washington State Ferries)
The route currently uses vessels carrying up to 144 or 188 vehicles. Starting in the 2028-2041
timeframe, Washington State Ferries plans to add a third boat to the route for the purpose of
increasing service frequency and capacity. All boats on the service would be the 144-vehicle vessels
that can be loaded and unloaded more quickly to meet 30-minute headways.
One of the two current service vessels, the Puyallup, is planned to be converted to electric-hybrid
propulsion and operate all-electric in 2023.
Washington State Ferries has not received any data or plans from BNSF on the double-tracking project
and therefore has not performed an analysis of how changes in train traffic will affect ferry operations.
In one 30-day period in 2015 Washington State Ferries tracked ten ferry delays (ranging from 3 to 15
minutes each) attributed to railroad crossing issues. See Sections 6 and 7 for further information and
recommendations on the train crossings.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 13
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Figure 5 - Main Street where it crosses the railroad and connects to the ferry dock (MAKERS)
A reservation system for the Edmonds-Kingston route was studied in 2010, and it was determined that
all central Puget Sound ferry routes would need to switch to reservations at the same time for the
system to be feasible. The Long Range Plan anticipates a further study of Edmonds terminal
improvements and what physical changes would be needed to the vehicle holding lanes.
The City of Edmonds 2021-2041 Capital Facilities Plan includes a $357,00 project to “Modify existing
lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users” by 2024.
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy
Economic Development Element
Policy A.8 Leverage business opportunities related to travelers to/from Edmonds using the Washington
State Ferry system.
Transportation Element
Policy 6.8 Form a multimodal system that links ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non-motorized travel providing
access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local
commercial districts and residential neighborhoods.
Recommendations
See Section 1 on Edmonds Crossing for related recommendations.
Recommendation 2.A. Develop new and more specific land use and transportation policies that
recognize the existing ferry terminal and reinforce the City’s support for the terminal’s current
location. Policies should explain the City’s stance and strategy around ferry traffic and holding lane
configuration, a potential vehicle reservation system, transit and walking/biking connections to the
terminal, and the implications of future three-boat service.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 25
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 14
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Recommendation 2.B. Adopt a new transportation policy that calls for a ferry traffic study to assess
the impacts of ferry traffic on the Downtown Waterfront. It is currently unclear what, if any, impacts
ferry traffic currently has since the SR-104 holding lanes appear to effectively segregate waiting
vehicles from the local street network and deboarding traffic occurs for 5-10 minutes during peak
times. This study is needed to support the update of the Downtown Waterfront vision (per
Recommendations 1.B and 11.A).
When the City conducts the study, it should direct staff to focus on street intersections to determine if
ferry traffic has any impacts on transit reliability, private property and business access, and the safety
and accessibility of pedestrian and bicycle routes between the waterfront and the core business
district. The study should also quantify the current number and duration of train crossing closures at
Main Street and Dayton Street, with averages developed over several days/weeks and which also
consider the peak freight holiday season (see also Section 7 and Recommendation 7.A).
The study should be done in time to support the updated Downtown Waterfront vision (see
Recommendation 11.A). If WSF begins planning for a vehicle reservation system or three-boat service
during the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, the study could potentially incorporate the
considerations of Recommendations 2.C and 2.D below.
Recommendation 2.C. If WSF moves to implement a vehicle reservation system, collaborate on joint
transportation planning to balance traffic improvements with the mitigation of potential community
impacts, such as pedestrian safety, vehicle idling, air and water pollution, transit reliability, local
business impacts, and local street access.
Recommendation 2.D. If WSF moves to implement three-boat service on the Edmonds-Kingston
route, the City should evaluate the community impacts and opportunities. In particular, collaboration
with WSF is needed to determine whether an additional boat slip, employee parking, or other terminal
expansion will be built and where the third boat will be moored overnight. The City should also
consider if higher service frequency would necessitate or allow changes to the configuration of
holding lanes and how this relates to the current holding lane project in the Capital Facilities Plan.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 26
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 15
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 3 – Unocal Property
Key Findings
The Unocal Property is a large irregularly shaped parcel (ID 27032600102400) on the south end of the
waterfront. The parcel is 21.31 acres in size. In 2005, the State of Washington signed a purchase and
sale agreement with Union Oil Company of California (Unocal), a subsidiary of Chevron, to purchase
the Unocal Property in anticipation of the Edmonds Crossing project.
Figure 6 - View of the Unocal Property (with approximate boundaries in yellow), cleanup operations, Willow
Creek, and stormwater pond. The Edmonds Marsh is at far left. (MAKERS)
The property remains contaminated after the shutdown of a bulk fuel terminal in 1991. The
Washington State Department of Ecology has been monitoring the cleanup of the site since that time.
Unocal is using a dual phase extraction system, which is a vacuum pumping technology that removes
contaminated ground water, petroleum products, and hydrocarbon vapor from the subsurface.
According to an email from the Department of Ecology, the extraction system was installed in
December 2017. Under an Interim Action Work Plan, the extraction system is expected to run for six
years (until December 2023). At that point, an assessment will determine whether the cleanup goals
have been met. If so, an additional two years of “confirmation monitoring” will occur through the end
of 2025 to show long term success. If the cleanup goals are not met, then contingency cleanup actions
will be taken with an uncertain schedule. The Department of Ecology will soon publish a draft Cleanup
Action Plan with more details on these processes, with the public invited to comment.
Per the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the State will be given title to the property once
the Department of Ecology has deemed it to be sufficiently cleaned. The City of Edmonds and
stakeholders have an interest in the property because it could play a key role in the restoration of
Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 16
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
In 2021 the State Legislature approved a proviso that provides the City of Edmonds the right of first
purchase at fair market value to acquire property rights for the site:
During the 2021-2023 biennium, if the [state transportation] department takes possession of
the property situated in the city of Edmonds for which a purchase agreement was executed
between Unocal and the department in 2005 (Tax Parcel Number 262703-2-003-0009), and if
the department confirms that the property is still no longer needed for transportation
purposes, the department shall provide the city of Edmonds with the right of first purchase at
fair market value in accordance with RCW 47.12.063(3) for the city's intended use of the
property to rehabilitate near-shore habitat for salmon and related species.
The end of the 2021-2023 biennium is June 30, 2023. Based on the information above provided by the
Department of Ecology, this right will expire before a determination can be made on whether cleanup
goals have been met at the property.
When WSDOT is given title to the property, they will conduct a public process and determine whether
the agency has any further need for the property for a transportation purpose. At this time, WSDOT
has not identified any such need beyond the agency’s original intent to use the property for the now-
inactive Edmonds Crossing project. If the property is deemed surplus, WSDOT will be required to
receive fair market value for the property either monetarily or through a land exchange. The WSDOT
Real Estate Office will work with stakeholders on how that compensation requirement is met.
The Unocal Property has a land use designation of Master Planned Development. The site is zoned
Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP2) under a contract rezone signed with Unocal in 2002. The
contract rezone is accompanied by a master plan showing two land use alternatives: Alternative One
includes the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center and a limited area set aside for
mixed-use development; Alternative Two acknowledges the unlikelihood of Edmonds Crossing
moving forward, and therefore exclusively includes only mixed-use development.
The master plan proposed specific zoning provisions that are still in place under Chapter 16.75 EMC,
MP – Master Plan Hillside Mixed-Use Zone, such as permitted uses and dimensional requirements.
EMC 16.75.020(D) stipulates that, “(1) No development shall be permitted in an MP1 or MP2 zone
unless a master plan has been prepared…”, and “(3) All property identified in the master plan shall be
developed in a manner consistent with the provisions of the master plan.”
Therefore, if the Unocal Property retains the MP2 zoning and the property owner desires a different
land use type or configuration than that envisioned in the 2002 master plan, a new master plan is
required to be approved by the City as a comprehensive plan amendment, a planned residential
development, or as a contract rezone. Under the terms of the original contract rezone, the City of
Edmonds may initiate a property rezone at any time, or the property owner may amend or terminate
the contract using the City’s rezoning procedures.
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy
Land Use Element
Open Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining the character and
quality of the Edmonds environment, in accordance with the following policies.
A.1. Undeveloped public property should be studied to determine its suitability and appropriate areas
designed as open space.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 28
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 17
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces:
A.2.a Lands which have unique scientific or educational value.
A.2.b Areas which have an abundance of wildlife, particularly where there are linked wildlife corridors or
habitats of rare or endangered species.
A.2.c Natural and green belt areas adjacent to highways and arterials with the priority to highways
classified as scenic.
A.2.d Areas which have steep slopes or are in major stream drainage ways, particularly those areas
which have significance to Edmonds residents as water sheds or natural drainage ways.
A.2.f Bogs and wetlands.
A.2.h Lands which would have unique suitability for future passive or active recreational use.
Open Space Goal B. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on Puget Sound.
The natural supply of prime recreational open space, particularly beaches and waterfront areas, must be
accessible to the public, in accordance with the following policies:
B.1 Edmonds saltwater shorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special consideration in all
future acquisition and preservation programs.
B.2 Wherever possible, provide public access to public bodies of water.
Recommendations
Recommendation 3.A. The City should retain an outside firm to perform a development feasibility
assessment of the Unocal Property to determine its fair market value. The assessment should account
for the site’s accessibility, presence of critical areas and other ecological features, historic soil and
water contamination, proximity to the railroad and other neighboring land uses, and other customary
real estate considerations. After completion of the assessment, the City should budget appropriately
for the expected fair market value.
Recommendation 3.B. The City should exercise its right of first purchase at fair market value on the
Unocal Property if it becomes available before June 2023. If this right expires before being exercised,
the City should update its 2023 state legislative agenda to include an extension of the right into the
2023-2025 biennium or permanently. This is because the Unocal property cleanup will likely continue
past the right’s current expiration, and the property’s transfer to WSDOT and subsequent availability
for purchase has an uncertain schedule.
Recommendation 3.C. As part of a cohesive Downtown Waterfront vision and 2024 Comprehensive
Plan Update, conduct a public process that determines the community’s desired future land use of the
Unocal Property. While there is vocal support for the City to acquire the property for the purpose of
ecological restoration and wildlife habitat preservation, and the Legislature’s understanding of the
City's intended use of the property is to rehabilitate near-shore habitat for salmon and related species,
this has not been affirmed by official City policy. The current Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and site-
specific master plan all assume and allow for the now-inactive Edmonds Crossing project and
commercial and mixed-use development.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 29
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 18
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
The public process could take a variety of forms and should be integrated into the 2024
Comprehensive Plan update and aligned with the visioning for the Downtown Waterfront, consistent
with Recommendations 1.B and 11.A.
This recommended public process is expected to result in a redesignating and rezoning of the Unocal
Property for open space purposes. If this is the case, the following Recommendations 3.D-F also apply.
Recommendation 3.D. See Recommendation 3.C above to determine if this recommendation
applies. Consider updating the Comprehensive Plan map to redesignate the Unocal Property from
Master Planned Development to Open Space. As documented by the key findings, the Edmonds
Crossing project as originally envisioned and planned for is no longer active and there are no
alternative development proposals by the property owner. Therefore, the Unocal Property’s
designation for Master Plan Development is outdated and should be updated.
The Open Space designation is appropriate if the City’s vision for the property is for ecological
restoration and wildlife habitat preservation. The City may adopt findings of fact that the designation
change meets Open Space goals and policy because the Edmonds Marsh system and associated
uplands property:
• provides unique scientific and educational value;
• has an abundance of wildlife;
• is a scenic natural area adjacent to a highway;
• provides major drainage way containing salmonid habitat with significance to Edmonds
residents;
• consists of wetlands and saltwater estuary; and
• already includes passive recreation uses.
Lastly, update the Comprehensive Plan’s description of the Master Plan Development designation (see
Recommendation 1.N).
Recommendation 3.E. See Recommendation 3.C above to determine if this recommendation applies.
Consider a City-initiated rezoning of the Unocal Property from Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP2) to
Open Space (OS) and prepare a staff report for Planning Board recommendation and City Council
approval. The OS zone is appropriate if the City’s vision for the property is for ecological restoration
and wildlife habitat preservation. The OS zone purpose includes:
• “To designate land…for open space use or which contributes significantly to the open space
inventory of the community”; and
• “To regulate the use of these lands…which provide an identifiable link to the city’s open space
or critical areas inventory.”
Permitted uses in the OS zone include “conservation areas including forest and wildlife preserves” and
“reclamation areas limited to soil, forest, wildlife or watershed.”
Recommendation 3.F. See Recommendation 3.C above to determine if this recommendation applies.
Prepare an ordinance for the aforementioned Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone to be
adopted simultaneously. This could be integrated into the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update process.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 19
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 4 – Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek Restoration
Key Findings
The Edmonds Marsh is one of the few urban, tidally-influenced, saltwater estuaries remaining in the
Puget Sound area. The marsh is hydrologically connected to Puget Sound through Willow Creek.
Before settlement, the marsh was 40 acres and today it is approximately 22 acres. The marsh is publicly
accessible on a half-mile of walkways and boardwalks and is popular with bird watchers due to the
variety of observed species. Coho salmon and cutthroat trout have a documented presence, and a
volunteer-run fish hatchery is located at the southeast area of the marsh. The marsh is classified as a
category II wetland.
Figure 7 – Left: Aerial view of Edmonds Marsh and environs at high tide, looking north. Right: Boardwalk and
wildlife viewing areas on the north side of Edmonds Marsh (MAKERS).
Willow Creek was diverted into an underground pipe in 1962 during the construction of the Port of
Edmonds marina, which has since limited fish access to the marsh. The creek currently empties into
Puget Sound under Marina Beach Park. The main action needed to restore the Edmonds Marsh is
daylighting Willow Creek and improving fish access for juvenile Chinook and other fish species to
migrate, rear, and forage in the marsh.
The 2016 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan estimated a cost of $12 million for the “Daylighting
Willow Creek, salmon habitat and stormwater management project.” The 2019 Expanded Marsh
Concept Design and Hydraulic Modeling study estimated this a cost of $13.6-16.6 million (this
estimate does not include additional work outside the scope of that study).
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 31
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 20
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Figure 8 - Edmonds Marsh and existing drainage network. The inset photo shows the Willow Creek culvert west
of the railroad tracks (Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan).
The 2016 Marina Beach Park Master Plan, and subsequent 30% design drawings for the redesigned
park, have the creek daylit west of the railroad and emptying into the Puget Sound on the beach.
Pedestrian bridges over the creek will discourage human and dog interaction with fish habitat.
Reconstruction of the park is estimated to cost $5.6 million.
Figure 9 - Excerpt from October 2019 City Council presentation illustrating daylight alignment alternative #6,
“channel with flood wall or berm” (City of Edmonds)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 32
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 21
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
East of the railroad, the 2019 study determined that a sinuous channel with a low flow habitat channel,
large woody debris, and wetland and riparian buffers will provide beneficial habitat for juvenile
salmon, meet fish‐passage criteria, and provide instream and marsh connectivity habitat functions.
This channel was illustrated roughly parallel to the railroad tracks (see Figure 9).
Stakeholders have expressed interest in moving the creek further away from the railroad tracks than
illustrated in conceptual designs. In August 2020, WSDOT communicated to Save Our Marsh that is has
no concerns with routing Willow Creek in a new channel across the middle of the Unocal Property if
public process, environmental considerations (particularly with regard to remaining contamination),
and appropriate compensation lead to that conclusion. The 2019 study considers this possibility,
saying:
We understand that the City staff and City Council are interested in expanding the Daylight
channel and riparian buffer footprint to the fullest extent possible. In this study, the Daylight
Project footprint is constrained by the assumption that WSDOT Ferries will use the site for the
future Edmonds Crossing…If the WSDOT Ferries site constraints are later removed, the
Daylight Channel alignment can be modified in final design. The one caution with expanding
the Daylight Channel is that costs will increase due to increases in excavation, fill, and
potential treatment and disposal quantities, as the risks for encountering residual
contamination on the site increase with any additional excavation.
The 2019 study also found water and sediment quality issues in the marsh and recommends sediment
contamination remediation, water quality monitoring, and fecal coliform source studies to restore and
improve the marsh health and ecosystem functions. During this project, stakeholders suggested
vehicle pollutant runoff from non-point sources across the study area are additional challenges to
improving the Edmonds Marsh water quality and creating a safe salmon habitat.
The critical area regulations (Chapter 23.50, Edmonds Community Development Code) provide that
ecological restoration of the Edmonds Marsh is an eligible location for off-site compensatory
mitigation for development projects.
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy
See other relevant policies under the Unocal Property section above.
Community Sustainability Element
Environmental Quality Goal A.1 Ensure that the city’s natural vegetation, especially native vegetation,
associated with its urban forests, wetlands, and other wildlife habitat areas are protected and enhanced for
future generations.
Environmental Quality Goal B.1 The City should promote and increase public awareness and pride in its
natural areas and wildlife heritage. Special emphasis should be directed toward preserving natural areas and
habitats (forests, wetlands, streams and beaches), especially those with native vegetation, that support a
diversity of wildlife.
Land Use Element
Vegetation and Wildlife Goal A. The city should ensure that its woodlands, marshes and other areas
containing natural vegetation are preserved…
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 22
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Vegetation and Wildlife Goal B. The city should promote and increase public awareness and pride in its
wildlife heritage. Special emphasis should be directed toward preserving the natural habitats (woodlands,
marshes, streams and beaches) of the city's wildlife in accordance with the following policies:
B.1 Establish and maintain a variety of educational and recreational programs and activities for all age
levels.
B.2 Erect and maintain educational displays that identify some of the more common plants and animals
and their ecosystems and habitats, including at streams, beaches, and marshes.
B.3 Prevent the unnecessary disturbance of native species and their respective habitats.
B.4 Encourage landscaping and site improvement on city-owned property which recognizes value of
habitat in overall site design.
Community Culture and Urban Design Element
Community Culture Goal B. Encourage recreational opportunities.
B.1 Encourage public access to significant recreational areas and development of pedestrian friendly
connections between areas.
B.2 Significant recreational areas would include, but not be limited to: Puget Sound Shorelines, Lake
Ballinger, Edmonds Marsh, Yost Park, Lund's Gulch, etc.
B.3 Compatible land uses should be made of surrounding areas.
B.4 Promote public awareness and recognition of the value of these resources.
Utilities Element
Storm and Surface Water Management Goal B. To preserve, protect, and (where feasible) restore surface
water resources to provide beneficial uses to humans, fish, and wildlife.
2016 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan
Goal 3: Shoreline Use and Access
Action plan item 3.F - Develop and implement a master plan to restore the hydrological and ecological
connection of Marina Beach Park to the Edmonds Marsh.
Goal 4: Natural Resource and Habitat Conservation
Action plan item 4.I - Consider expanding the function and facilities around the Willow Creek Hatchery
to create a more expansive interpretive center that includes the Edmonds Marsh.
Recommendations
See related recommendations under Section 3 and Section 5.
Recommendation 4.A. Continue planning and funding of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek
restoration project, including refined cost estimates, engineering, and flood mitigation planning. A
collection of projects related to marsh restoration are listed in the Edmonds 2021-2041 Capital
Facilities Plan. See also the recommendations regarding flooding and sea level rise in Section 5, and
the need to coordinate with a possible Admiral Way overpass under Recommendation 7.E.
Recommendation 4.B. If Edmonds acquires the Unocal Property (see Section 3), update the design
options for Willow Creek restoration to fully consider the land, optimize ecological outcomes, and
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 34
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 23
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
further improve fish habitat. Key considerations include adjacent land uses and potential pollutants,
the width of vegetated riparian zones, avoiding potential fish stranding in connected seasonal
inundation areas, avoiding residual contamination from site soils, and minimizing additional cost.
Recommendation 4.C. Continue coordinating with property owners and public agencies on
pollutant control to minimize untreated runoff into Edmonds Marsh. This may include capital
improvements, joint application for grant funding, or enhanced maintenance. For example, the Port of
Edmonds manages stormwater quality management with catch basin cleaning and regular power
vacuum sweeping of paved areas.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 24
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 5 – Natural Hazards and Critical Areas
Key Findings
Figure 10 - National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance Rate Map showing base flood level in Edmonds
(Federal Emergency Management Agency)
The Downtown Waterfront is subject to impacts from several types of natural hazards and critical
areas.
In Edmonds, sea level rise of 4 inches to 4 feet is expected over the next century, and the intensity of
storm surges is expected to increase during this time. Nearly the entire Edmonds waterfront is within
the 100-year floodplain. Flood maps were updated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) in June 2020.
Base flood elevation (BFE) is the elevation of surface water resulting from a flood that has a one
percent chance of equaling or exceeding that level in any given year. The BFE on the Edmonds
waterfront is 12 feet above sea level.
During a major flood event at BFE, the inundation area would include all waterfront properties along
Admiral Way and Railroad Avenue, the ferry terminal, the railroad tracks, Edmonds Station and the
transit center, a portion of Edmonds Way/Highway 104, Harbor Square, and part of Salish Crossing.
This indicates that a major flood event could pose a risk to human life, property, and the environment.
Major flooding would also disrupt a multimodal transportation hub of regional significance.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 25
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
The 2019 Expanded Marsh Concept Design and Hydraulic Modeling study found that without flood
mitigation, the Willow Creek daylighting project in combination with extreme king tides, storm surges,
and future sea level rise may increase flooding along the railroad, Harbor Square, and State Route 104.
Flood protection berms or floodwalls in these locations will be necessary to reduce flood risks
compared to existing conditions. The 2019 study included these elements in the cost estimates, and
further noted:
We estimated costs for Alternative 6A (flood berms $13.6M) and 6B (floodwalls $16.6M). Flood
berms may be feasible but may be more difficult to permit as the floodberms will have
increased wetland impacts. Depending on wetland permitting regulations, Project funding
sources, and BNSF Railway input, there may be Project regulatory and landowner drivers that
could dictate which of these structures is feasible and acceptable, regardless of the Project
costs.
The Port of Edmonds bulkhead project considered sea level rise during project development. The
bulkhead is only being raised six inches to accommodate a grade change. Analysis by the Army Corps
of Engineers and the Port determined a taller bulkhead was not necessary because the bulkhead does
not support any structures, nor would a taller (and therefore more costly) bulkhead prevent flooding
beyond its extents.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 26
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Figure 11 - Critical areas map generated by the City of Edmonds online Geographic Information System. The
purple shading represents sensitive species habitat areas.
A large portion of the planning area is within a seismic hazard zone, meaning that soil may liquefy and
cause additional damage to buildings and infrastructure in the event of an earthquake. In the Puget
Sound area, this type of risk is typically found in waterfront areas of fill where land has been artificially
expanded. Data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources further subclassifies the
liquefaction hazard area shown on Figure 11, with the area west of the railroad having a high-risk
susceptibility the area around the Edmonds Marsh and Harbor Square having a moderate-to-high
susceptibility.
The slope between the Edmonds Marsh/Unocal Property and the Point Edwards development is
mapped as an erosion hazard.
Much of the offshore marine waters and the Edmonds Marsh system are mapped as sensitive species
habitat area.
As noted in Section 4, the Edmonds Marsh is classified as a category II estuarine and coastal lagoon
wetland. The critical area regulations (Chapter 23.50, Edmonds Community Development Code)
provide that ecological restoration of the Edmonds Marsh is an eligible location for off-site
compensatory mitigation for development projects. Information on the relationship between the
marsh and land use is in Section 11.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 27
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Relevant Comprehensive Plan and Hazard Mitigation Plan Policy
Community Sustainability Element
Climate Change Goal C. Assess the risks and potential impacts on both city government operations and on
the larger Edmonds community due to climate change. The assessment of risk and potential responses –
both in terms of mitigation and adaptation – should evaluate the full range of issues, paying particular
attention to those arising from the city’s location on Puget Sound.
Implementation Action: By 2017, update the City’s Hazard Mitigation Plan to reference emerging risks and
hazards related to climate change, such as rising sea levels and ocean acidification.
Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan, City of Edmonds Annex
Table 6-7 Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix. ED-23. Sea level rise mitigation planning, including
assessment of risk and strategies to address. Lead department: Development Services, Public Works, Parks
and Recreation. Cost: Low. Timeline: Short term.
Recommendations
Recommendation 5.A. Update the Comprehensive Plan with more specific policies that address the
City’s preparation for and response to future major flooding events and long-term sea level rise in the
Downtown Waterfront area. Utilize the latest information on flood levels and sea level rise projections.
Sea level rise should be factored into the updated Downtown Waterfront vision (see Recommendation
11.A).
Recommendation 5.B. Using the latest sea level rise projections and FEMA flood data, update the
assessment of the physical, economic, and social impacts of long-term sea level rise in the Downtown
Waterfront area and the necessary actions or projects to protect lives, public infrastructure, and
private property. This may support an update to the 2015 Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan
and City of Edmonds Annex. Communicate findings on sea level rise to the Edmonds community.
Recommendation 5.C. Continue planning for flood mitigation as an essential component of the
Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project (see also Recommendation 4.A.). This includes
refined cost estimating and determining the preferred location for flood berms and/or floodwalls that
most effectively protect lives and property. The construction and operation of flood berms and
floodwalls should seek to minimize environmental disturbances and takings of private property.
Coordinate with BNSF Railway, the Port of Edmonds, and WSDOT on planning, design, and potential
cost sharing.
Additionally, adequate sizing of the stream crossing near the Puget Sound shoreline would improve
hydrologic connections to the marsh and the flood water storage functions it naturally provides. Given
the modeled increases in flood event frequency and magnitude, site improvements in floodplains
should be scaled accordingly.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 28
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 6 – Railroad Double-Tracking
Key Findings
BNSF Railway owns and operates railroad tracks along the eastern shoreline of Puget Sound, and a
single-track segment runs through the Edmonds waterfront. Spurred by the business and operations
efficiency needs of freight service and the reliability of passenger service (operated by Sound Transit
and Amtrak), BNSF plans to add a second track to this segment. The project is anticipated to begin
construction in 2024. According to Sound Transit, a second passenger platform on the west side of
Edmonds Station is not planned since passenger service is infrequent and unidirectional.
The project will fill the 2-mile gap between other double-track segments roughly between Edmonds
Street in the north to Point Wells in the south. The second track will be located 15 feet east of the
current track within BNSF right-of-way. Some site work has already occurred to prepare for the project,
including embankment work on the west edge of the Edmonds Marsh and stockpiling of ties.
BNSF Railway owns the land at the two railroad street crossings in the waterfront area, located at Main
Street and Dayton Street, and the City possesses easements for the street crossings. Legal research on
case law and property documents determined there is no evidence that the City of Edmonds has
acquired fee simple title to the underlying property.
BNSF has not shared any project plans with the City. MAKERS conducted a preliminary analysis of
physical impacts based on the minimum track clearances for railroads being 8 feet horizontal and 23.5
feet vertical. The analysis shows Railroad Avenue should not be affected by the project. At Edmonds
Station the existing ADA wheelchair ramp (mini-high platform) will be removed and the passenger
platform and stationhouse at Edmonds Station are likely to remain in place.
Figure 12 - Visualization of second railroad track (MAKERS)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 29
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
BNSF is not planning any major mitigation work associated with the project. Sound Transit plans to
rebuild the wheelchair ramp and make refinements to the existing platform edge, and the agency
believes BNSF may provide track protection/flagging during these platform improvements.
Figure 13 – Left: View looking north at Edmonds Station. The second track will remove most of the asphalt
paving and require replacing the wheelchair ramp in the distance. Right: This walkway between the station
and Main Street would also be removed by the second track construction. (MAKERS)
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy
Land Use Element
Noise Pollution Goal A. A.3 It is the policy of the city to minimize noise created by the railroad.
Recommendations
See related recommendations under Sections 7 and 8.
Recommendation 6.A. Create additional Comprehensive Plan policies in the Transportation Element
that support mitigation of railroad traffic and crossing closures.
Recommendation 6.B. Apply to the Federal Railroad Administration to establish a full quiet zone.
Wayside horns are currently in place which still have sound impacts on surrounding land uses. A full
quiet zone greatly reduces train horns sound impacts in exchange for upgrading the safety of at-grade
crossings with additional gates, signals, and other measures. Local jurisdictions usually need to
provide funding for the safety upgrades. Applying for a quiet zone requires the assistance of a
specialized consultant.
Recommendation 6.C. Coordinate with Sound Transit and BNSF to minimize construction impacts
from the second track project and to expediate improvements to Edmonds Station that maintain
passenger accessibility and capacity.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 30
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 7 – Waterfront Emergency Access
Key Findings
The waterfront and marina area west of the railroad have special emergency access considerations
because the train tracks isolate it from the rest of Edmonds. On several occasions, train traffic has
delayed ambulances or required first responders to cross through stopped trains on foot to
treat/evacuate individuals needing care.
In the period July 2010 to December 2015, emergency calls to locations west of the railroad track
numbered 277 (including 72 advanced life support calls, 14 fires, and eight water rescues). This is an
average of one call per week. Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 also receives 40-50 calls per year
that requires accessing their emergency boat that is moored at the Edmonds Marina.
Figure 14 – A freight train passing through the Dayton Street crossing (photo by Bill Anderson)
Observed and projected train volumes vary widely (see Figure 15). Currently, approximately 40 trains
of all kind pass travel through Edmonds daily. Various studies and plans estimate up to 80 trains per
day in the future, with freight volumes being highly dependent on economic trends. A related factor is
the average length of freight trains, which has been steadily increasing over time nationwide.
The number and length of trains has implications for “gate down” time at the Dayton Street and Main
Street crossings, which currently average about two minutes per train. In one 30-day period in 2015,
Washington State Ferries tracked ten ferry delays ranging from three to 15 minutes, each attributed to
railroad crossing issues.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 42
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 31
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Year
Average
Daily Trains Sources/Notes
Observations
2008 48 Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan (2009)
2012 37 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study, page 18, citing 2012 City of Edmonds
video recordings
Note: This study found average gate down times of 1.33 hours daily and 2.16
minutes per train.
2012 40 Edmonds Resolution No. 1280 (2012)
2014 36-43 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study, pages 1 and 18
Projections/Forecasts
2028 80 Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan (2009)
2035 82 PSRC Economic Evaluation of Regional Impacts for the Proposed Gateway Pacific
Terminal at Cherry Point (2014)
Note: This projection includes 18 trains associated with the cancelled Gateway
Pacific Terminal project.
2035 64 Washington State Rail Plan (2014)
2040 44-76 Washington State Rail Plan (2020), range of low/moderate/high growth scenarios
Figure 15 - Observed and projected train volumes in Edmonds
The 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study presented a near-term recommendation to implement an
Edmonds Street Emergency Access Overpass, which was further studied in the January 2019 Edmonds
Street Waterfront Connector Alternatives Analysis Report. The concept was a pedestrian-bike bridge
that could also be used for emergency vehicle access and ferry loading during train blockages. The
Connector project was in early design when, in June 2019, the Edmonds City Council voted to cancel
the project due to public opposition to potential impacts to the waterfront’s natural features.
Reliable emergency access for the waterfront west of the railroad tracks remains unresolved.
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy
Transportation Element
Policy 5.6 Design streets to accommodate emergency service vehicles. Improve emergency service access to
the waterfront, especially to west side of train tracks when there is a train crossing.
Recommendations
See related recommendations under Section 6.
Recommendation 7.A. For planning purposes, assume 60-80 trains per day will pass through
Edmonds by the end of the 2024-2044 planning period. To better understand current train traffic,
perform the ferry traffic study described by Recommendation 2.B.
Recommendation 7.B. Update the Comprehensive Plan transportation policy 5.6 to clarify that
emergency service access to the waterfront includes considerations for both vehicular and non-
vehicular access.
Recommendation 7.C. Street closures due to train crossings are a continued problem, and
emergency service in the waterfront area west of the railroad tracks remains at risk of disruption.
Consider updating the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, Community Sustainability Element,
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 43
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 32
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
and Capital Facilities Plan with policies to support enhanced emergency management services in this
area. Emergency considerations include fire and medical response, police response, boating and
marine incidents, and natural disaster response (such as flooding).
Further, the City should take such actions to implement the policies. Emergency management
planning and investments must be conducted collaboratively with organizations such as the Port of
Edmonds, BNSF Railway, Washington State Ferries, Snohomish County, and Snohomish County Fire
District No. 1.
Opportunities for capital facilities studies west of the tracks include a new staffed fire station or
ambulance/paramedic facility, a staffed police kiosk or mini-precinct, and/or unstaffed storage of
emergency response vehicles/equipment (which was considered in the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront
Access Study). Transportation options that should be studied include a new pedestrian-only overpass
(see Recommendation 7.D) and/or a new vehicular emergency vehicle roadway (see Recommendation
7.E).
Recommendation 7.D. Update the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element and Capital Facilities
Plan with policies to support planning, design, and funding of a pedestrian-only overpass across the
railroad tracks. Further, the City should take such actions to implement the project. This is consistent
with the “near-term” recommendation from the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study for a
midblock pedestrian overpass, estimated to cost $6-8 million (not adjusted for inflation).
To minimize costs and aesthetic impacts, the City should plan for the overpass to have a compact
footprint with switchback stairs and elevators (no ramps or escalators) and clearances no greater than
required by the railroad. There are several opportunities to site the overpass on public property,
illustrated conceptually in Figure 16. Planning considerations include span length and subsequent
cost, pedestrian safety, ease of use, staging areas for emergency responders, and changes to
circulation systems (parking, transit center, sidewalks, etc.) depending on where structures are placed.
Coordination with BNSF Railway will be needed to maintain railroad track clearances and manage
construction. The project also will require agreements with any affected property owners.
Figure 16 – Conceptual midblock pedestrian overpass locations illustrated in orange, generally on public
property, between Dayton Street and Main Street (MAKERS)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 44
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 33
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Figure 17 - Concept for a midblock pedestrian overpass at Edmonds Station (2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access
Study)
Recommendation 7.E. If vehicular emergency access remains desirable by the City and emergency
response agencies, update the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element and Capital Facilities Plan
to support planning, design, and funding of an emergency vehicle roadway and overpass at the south
end of the waterfront. Further, the City should take such actions to implement the project if it acquires
the Unocal Property (see Section 3 for related recommendation).
An “Admiral Way Overpass” was evaluated in the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study, receiving
positive public feedback and scoring high for human and natural environment criteria, and was
screened out after a second level evaluation. The estimated cost is $10 million for the overpass and
$25-31 million for the full project (not adjusted for inflation). Cost assumptions could likely be updated
around land acquisition needs, new parking, and hazardous material removal.
The concept should be revisited because the route could utilize an existing roadway on the Unocal
site, and it would not have the aesthetic or environmental concerns that were raised with the
Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector. By hugging the base of the hillside below Point Edwards, the
route is mostly out of public view, does not occupy a beach shoreline, and it would not be designed
for ferry traffic. The route could be open for non-motorized use during non-emergency times, which
would enhance pedestrian and bicycle access between the waterfront and residential areas south of
Downtown.
The design may need to be coordinated with the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration (see
Recommendations 4.A and 4.B). Close coordination with the Port of Edmonds will be necessary to
minimize impacts to parking and marina operations. Coordination with BNSF Railway will be needed
to maintain railroad track clearances, resolve any property issues, and manage construction.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 45
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 34
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Figure 18 - Conceptual route for a vehicular emergency access connection (MAKERS)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 46
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 35
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 8 – Edmonds Station Access Projects and Sound Transit Service
Key Findings
During regular service, the Sounder North commuter rail line operates eight daily trips from Everett to
Seattle with an intermediate stop in Edmonds. Pre-pandemic, the route carried about 1,500
passengers daily. Service has been reduced to four daily trips during the pandemic.
Figure 19 - Excerpt of planned access projects at Edmonds Station (Sound Transit, MAKERS)
Sound Transit proposed several Edmonds Station access and mobility improvements in the Sound
Transit 3 funding package, which voters approved in 2016. The value of the improvements is
estimated at $25 million and includes parking improvements, pedestrian lighting, additional bus bays,
bike lockers, and additional weather protection on the station platform. One of the parking
improvement projects under consideration is reconfiguring or repainting the WSDOT parking lot on
James Street so that it fits more parking spaces.
Due to financial challenges, Sound Transit’s mobility/access projects around Edmonds Station are
delayed by about ten years, with completion expected in 2034 instead of 2024.
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy
Land Use Element
Downtown/Waterfront Area Short Term Actions 3. Improve the existing downtown rail station between
Dayton and Main Streets in order to better accommodate inter-city passenger and commuter rail service,
including provisions for bus and commuter traffic as well as pedestrian connections to the waterfront and
downtown…
Transportation Element
Policy 6.8 Form a multimodal system that links ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non-motorized travel providing
access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local
commercial districts and residential neighborhoods.
Recommendations
Recommendation 8.A. In the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element
and in the Transportation Element, acknowledge the Edmonds Station access improvements that are
planned by Sound Transit and support their implementation as soon as possible. See related
Recommendation 6.C.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 47
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 36
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 9 – Bus Service
Key Findings
Community Transit operates four bus routes that stop at Edmonds Station. Three of the routes are
local and one is an express service to Downtown Seattle. The agency is currently updating its Long
Range Plan and network vision, with adoption targeted for late 2022.
By 2024, the agency is planning a major service restructure in the area to leverage the new light rail
stations opening at the nearby Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace transit centers. As part of the
restructure, local bus service in Downtown Edmonds will increase 30-50% with most lines running
every 15 minutes. Additional layover space is necessary to accommodate increased bus service but
has not yet been located or designed (Sound Transit proposes new bus bays by the year 2034, see
Section 8). Adjacent properties would be most desirable for this purpose and buses cannot be routed
across the railroad tracks.
The current local routes 116 and 130 connect people in Downtown Edmonds to the transit centers in
Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace. City of Edmonds staff report community interest in improved bus
service/speed for these connections.
In 2022 Community Transit began construction on a bus rapid transit (BRT) route, known as the Swift
Orange Line, running between Edmonds College to Lynnwood, Ash Way, and Mill Creek. The route will
open by mid-2024 and connect to the Lynnwood light rail station.
Community Transit anticipates a future extension of the Orange Line westward to the vicinity of
Downtown Edmonds, possibly using 196th Street. Currently, the extension is conceptual and
unfunded, and it requires a BRT-compliant terminal facility. Also, Community Transit’s draft 2050 Long
Range Plan includes a “transit emphasis corridor” along SR-104 between Downtown Edmonds and the
Mountlake Terrace light rail station, with potential 15-minute service all day on weekdays.
Figure 20 - Edmonds transit map (Community Transit, MAKERS)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 48
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 37
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Figure 21 - Edmonds Station bus transit center (MAKERS)
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy
Land Use Element
Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal B. Continue to plan for and implement improvements in the
downtown/waterfront area that resolve safety conflicts while encouraging multi-modal transportation and
access to the waterfront.
B.3 Provide a more efficient transportation system featuring improved bus service, pedestrian and
bicycle routes, and adequate streets and parking areas.
Transportation Element
Policy 5.17 Encourage the provision of a bus rapid transit system or other high-capacity frequent transit
service along SR 104.
Policy 6.8 Form a multimodal system that links ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non-motorized travel providing
access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local
commercial districts and residential neighborhoods.
Recommendations
Recommendation 9.A. Continue discussions with Community Transit and Sound Transit about the
location and design of the additional bus bays that are planned at Edmonds Station. Consider a new
policy in the Transportation Element that promotes that these new bus bays include a BRT-compliant
terminal facility to facilitate future delivery of the Orange Line (e.g., see the transit design guidelines
from the National Association of City Transportation Officials).
Recommendation 9.B. Consider a new policy in the Transportation Element that promotes City
actions to accelerate the delivery of the Swift Orange Line extension to Downtown Edmonds and/or
frequent service to the Mountlake Terrace light rail station. The policy should support discussions with
WSDOT about options for future bus service enhancements along SR-104 and SR-524. Avenues of City
support could include, but are not limited to, City funding for planning and construction, joint grant
applications, expedited right-of-way permitting/easements (e.g., for stations), transit spot
improvements (e.g., bus lanes and signal priority), and proactive community discussions of preferred
alignments.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 49
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 38
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Recommendation 9.C. Continue coordinating with Community Transit generally on bus service
revisions and transit facility planning to maximize multimodal connectivity, transit ridership, and
pedestrian safety.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 50
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 39
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 10 – Port of Edmonds
Key Findings
The Port of Edmonds owns and manages approximately 33 upland acres as well as a small boat harbor
and marina, with space for 1,000 boats. A variety of services and marine-related businesses are located
on the Port's properties.
The Port is rebuilding part of the bulkhead at the marina, a project valued at $15-20 million. The
project includes an improved walkway on the bulkhead and two new plazas, public restrooms, and
landscaping. The bulkhead reconstruction is in the design phase with earliest estimated completion in
2025, depending on timing of permits. The Port’s new administration building is in the permitting
phase and estimated to be completed by 2024. After this current series of work, the Port of Edmonds
does not have plans for major infrastructure or development work.
Figure 22 - Port of Edmonds project sites (MAKERS)
The Port recently considered building a parking structure at the corner of Admiral Way and Dayton
Street. The current surface parking lot there has approximately 100 spaces for a mix of commuters and
Port tenants. Due to the site’s zoning (Commercial Waterfront with a 30 feet height limit), a parking
structure could not be built large enough on the site to create a worthwhile increase in the current
number of spaces, so the Port is not proceeding with the concept.
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy
Land Use Element
Downtown/Waterfront Area Long Term Actions. 3. Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port
development.
Economic Development Element
Economic Development Goal A.7 Continue to partner with business leaders, organizations and community
members, such as the Port of Edmonds, Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, etc., to leverage business
opportunities and to solicit and address feedback to enhance the business environment.
Recommendations
Recommendation 10.A. As they arise, continue coordinating infrastructure and development
planning efforts with the Port of Edmonds.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 51
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 40
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 11 – Land Use and Economic Development
Key Findings
Land use and economic development considerations in the waterfront study area include several
large properties.
One such property is Harbor Square, a commercial site owned by the Port of Edmonds. The site is
under a contract rezone dating from 1980 and updated in 1998. The site has several 1-2 story
buildings containing a mix of commercial uses, including a hotel, athletic club, retail shops, medical
clinics, professional offices, and associated parking lots. In 2012 the Port of Edmonds applied for an
amendment to the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan to adopt a Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan with
a vision for mixed-use development. The redevelopment plan intended to further the Port’s statutory
directive of “engaging in economic development programs” to benefit constituents of the Port District
as well as the overall Edmonds community with an expanded tax base, increased downtown activity,
and promotion of transit-oriented development.
Figure 23 – Left: Concept for the 2012 Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan (Port of Edmonds). Right: A building
at Harbor Square (MAKERS).
A specific architectural design was not part of the Harbor Square amendment. The Edmonds Planning
Board approved the Port’s amendment with conditions, and the Edmonds City Council rejected the
application due to public opposition to potentially taller buildings on the site and a desire to do a
comprehensive review of the entire waterfront area. Today the Port considers Harbor Square to be
economically stable and there are no other plans for major improvements or redevelopment.
Another major property is the Salish Crossing commercial center. The center is fully leased, and the
owner has no plans for major improvements or redevelopment. The non-profit Cascadia Art Museum,
located at Salish Crossing, draws approximately 13,000 visitors per year.
Harbor Square and Salish Crossing are located between SR-104 and the railroad tracks, which is the
area subject to Land Use Element short term action #4 that calls for a joint public/private development
and activities such as infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, and
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 52
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 41
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
development incentives and guidelines or modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or
master planning).
The Edmonds Waterfront Center, a two-story community facility owned by the non-profit Edmonds
Senior Center, opened in July 2021. Along with hosting social, health, and recreation programs and a
coffee shop, the venue is available to the public for events. The project also rebuilt a portion of the
waterfront walkway.
Figure 24 - Left: The Ebb Tide Condominiums (gray building) and the new Edmonds Waterfront Center.
Right: The Salish Crossing property and Edmonds Station (at far right). Images by MAKERS.
There is an approximately 300-feet long gap in the recreational waterfront walkway that runs between
Main Street and Dayton Street. The completion of this “missing link” has been delayed by litigation
since at least 2017. The litigation is a result of disagreement between the Ebb Condominium
homeowner association and the City of Edmonds about the use of an easement.
Following a recommendation by City staff and the Citizens Economic Development Commission, in
February 2021 the City Council amended the CW zone to allow hotels. The most likely prospect for a
hotel in the study area is limited to adaptive reuse due to limited land availability and the CW zone
height limit.
Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy
Land Use Element
Edmonds Crossing Short Term Actions (page 53) 4. Plan for future joint public/private development of the
area between SR-104 and the railroad tracks. Planning activities could potentially include infrastructure
planning, property acquisition, parking management, development incentives and guidelines or
modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or master planning)…
Downtown/Waterfront Districts. In addition to the goals and policies for the downtown/waterfront area,
the Comprehensive Plan Map depicts a number of districts in the downtown/waterfront area. These districts
are described below.
Downtown Mixed Commercial. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floor spaces should be designed
with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses., with commercial
entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line. Building heights shall be compatible with
the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development. The first floor of buildings must provide pedestrian
weather protection along public sidewalks. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian-scale design
features, differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. The design of
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 53
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 42
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual business spaces can
be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. When the rear
of a property adjoins a residentially-designated property, floor area that is located behind commercial street
frontage may be appropriate for residential use. Where single family homes still exist in this area,
development regulations should allow for “live-work” arrangements where the house can accommodate
both a business and a residence as principal uses. Downtown Mixed Residential. In this area, commercial
uses would be allowed but not required (i.e. buildings could be entirely commercial or entirely residential, or
anything in between). Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown
Mixed Commercial District. Buildings facing the Dayton Street corridor should provide a pedestrian-friendly
streetscape, providing pedestrian amenities and differentiating the ground floor from upper building levels.
Downtown Mixed Residential. In this area, commercial uses would be allowed but not required (i.e.
buildings could be entirely commercial or entirely residential, or anything in between). Height and design of
buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. Buildings facing the
Dayton Street corridor should provide a pedestrian-friendly streetscape, providing pedestrian amenities and
differentiating the ground floor from upper building levels.
Downtown Master Plan. The properties between SR-104 and the railroad, including Harbor Square, the
Edmonds Shopping Center (former Safeway site), and extending past the Commuter Rail parking area up to
Main Street. This area is appropriate for design-driven master planned development which provides for a
mix of uses and takes advantage of its strategic location between the waterfront and downtown. Any
redevelopment in this area should be oriented to the street fronts, and provide pedestrian-friendly walking
areas, especially along Dayton and Main Streets. Development design should also not ignore the railroad
side of the properties, since this is an area that provides a “first impression” of the city from railroad
passengers and visitors to the waterfront. Art work, landscaping, and modulated building design should be
used throughout any redevelopment project.
Shoreline Commercial. The waterfront, west of the railroad tracks between the public beaches and the Port
(currently zoned CW). Consistent with the City's Shoreline Master Program, this area should allow a mix of
public uses, supporting commercial uses, and water-oriented and water-dependent uses. Building heights
shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development while providing incentives to
encourage public view corridors. Roof and building forms should be an important consideration in design
guidelines for this area, because of its high sensitivity and proximity to public open spaces. Redevelopment
should result in singular, landmark buildings of high quality and sustainable design which take advantage of
the visibility and natural environment of their location, and which contribute to the unique character of the
waterfront. Pedestrian amenities and weather protection must be provided for buildings located along
public walkways and street fronts.
Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal A. A.4 Enhance shoreline features to include a full spectrum of
recreational activities, park settings, natural features (such as the Edmonds Marsh), and marina facilities.
Improve public access to the shoreline and link waterfront features by establishing a continuous esplanade
along the shoreline. The esplanade will be constructed over time through public improvements and
Shoreline Master Program requirements placed on private development.
Downtown/Waterfront Area Short Term Actions 7. Continue implementing a continuous shoreline
walkway (boardwalk/esplanade) from Brackett’s Landing North to Point Edwards. Work with the Port of
Edmonds to integrate recreation and marina functions into the long term plan.
Economic Development Element
Economic Development Goal B. Revitalize and enhance the city’s business districts, balancing the needs for
housing, commerce and employment development with neighborhood character, amenities and scale.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 54
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 43
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
B.4. Continue to foster and enhance the economic vitality of Downtown Edmonds, including retention
and growth of existing businesses, attraction of new businesses, and promotion of appropriate in-fill
redevelopment…
B.6. Promote enhanced connectivity between the Edmonds Center of the Arts and the Downtown
business community to maximize synergy and economic impacts.
Economic Development Goal E. Expand and enhance the tourism sector to attract outside spending to help
fuel the local economy.
E.7. Support efforts to enhance the hospitality infrastructure, including potential for an increased
number and/or wider range of lodging establishments Downtown…
Community Culture and Urban Design Element
Urban Design Goal B: Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. Design objectives and standards should be
carefully crafted for the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center to encourage its unique design character and
important place-making status within the city.
B.9 Building Height. Create and preserve a human scale for downtown buildings. Building frontages
along downtown streetscapes should be pedestrian in scale.
Zoning Standards
The table below summarizes key zones in the waterfront area. As noted in the recommendations
below, the consultant team finds that the building height limits in most zones and the prohibition on
residential use in the CW zone are a constraint to economic development on the Edmonds waterfront.
Major Zones in the
Waterfront Study Area Height Limit Density Limit
Permitted
Residential
Uses
Examples of
Permitted Non-
Residential Uses
Commercial Waterfront
(CW)
30 feet None None Marine-oriented
service, retail, office,
hotels
General Commercial (CG)
with Harbor Square contract
rezone
35 feet None None Most non-residential
uses
Other Harbor Square contract rezone requirements include minimum 25 feet setbacks from streets and the
marsh, required screening of service and storage areas, and requiring all development to receive Architectural
Design Board approval.
Community Business (BC) 25-30 feet* 3.0 FAR max. Single-family
and multifamily
Retail, restaurants,
offices, services
Downtown Mixed
Commercial (BD2)
30 feet None Single-family
and upper-story
multifamily
Retail, office, service,
hotels
Downtown Mixed
Residential (BD4)
30 feet None
Multi Family (RM-1.5) 25 feet 1,500 sq. ft. lot
area per unit
min.
Single-family
and multifamily
None
Multi Family (RM-2.4) 25-30 feet* 2,400 sq. ft. lot
area per unit
min.
* Maximum height depends on roof design, see Title 16 EMC for details.
Figure 25 - Summary of waterfront area zoning standards
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 55
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 44
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Figure 26 - Excerpt of Edmonds zoning map in the waterfront area (City of Edmonds)
Shoreline Management Standards
The Edmonds Shoreline Master Program (SMP) provides standards for development and
environmental protection along the shorelines of Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. The shoreline
jurisdiction generally extends 200 feet landward. Figure 27 shows shoreline designations.
Figure 27 – South Edmonds Shoreline Master Program designations (City of Edmonds)
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 56
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 45
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
In general, the shoreline designations impose stricter limitations on permitted uses than what is
allowed by the underlying zoning. Some land uses have minimum shore setbacks that may exceed
other setback requirements, such as minimum 50-60 feet shore setbacks for parking areas in some
designations. The building height limits follow the standards of the underlying zoning.
Notably, for the Edmonds Marsh, in the Urban Mixed Use IV designation the standards require a
minimum 110-foot buffer and an additional 15-foot building setback beyond (Edmonds Community
Development Code section 24.40.090). The buffer must be vegetated and maintained to protect
ecological functions. The width of the required buffer impacts the future economic development
potential of the Port of Edmonds’ Harbor Square property. The code’s footnote 18 allows for an
alternative buffer width through a shoreline conditional use permit “if a site-specific scientific study
determines that the default buffer is not necessary to protect and maintain the baseline functions of
this wetland/tideland habitat and its other associated ecological functions from being adversely
impacted by the proposed project.”
Recommendations
The consultant team observes that the Edmonds Waterfront and Downtown are special places in
Puget Sound. To be sure, there are other waterfront towns, but Edmonds stands out with its historic
character, human-scaled development pattern, and walkable waterfront. These attributes appear to
drive Edmonds' economic health (and economic development) in as much as people want to live,
work, and visit in such a community.
Recommendation 11.A. As part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, conduct public
engagement for the purpose of crafting an updated vision for the Downtown Waterfront area. The
vision should clearly articulate the community’s desires for the type and intensity of desired land uses
for key properties within the framework of current market realities (building height is a significant
controversy in the area, but the community’s vision for the level of density and vibrancy on the
Downtown Waterfront is unclear).
Since Edmonds Crossing is inactive, the updated vision should also reorient the community’s desires
for how the existing ferry terminal is integrated into the Downtown Waterfront. Similarly, the updated
vision should explain how the Port of Edmonds, the waterfront parks, the Unocal Property, Edmonds
Station, and other major waterfront properties and amenities are best related and planned for in the
future. Sea level rise should also be considered. This should include an update to the Downtown
Master Plan land use designation and description that currently applies to Harbor Square, Salish
Crossing, and the rail/bus transit center (see page 56 of the Comprehensive Plan). See related
Recommendations 1.B, 3.C, 5.A, and 11.E.
Recommendation 11.B. Based on land use patterns on other Pacific Northwest waterfronts, it is
reasonable to believe that there may be demand for new hotel rooms on the Edmonds waterfront.
Given the unique potential of a beachfront hotel, the City should adopt Comprehensive Plan policies
that support working to attract a hotel operator and associated uses (restaurant, water-related, and/or
other commercial). Hotels can anchor waterfront destinations and their customers typically have
higher spending power than local permanent residents of an area, which will help support nearby
commercial space in the area. The City should explore a range of strategies to attract a hotel, including
first conducting a hotel feasibility study, developing a targeted incentives package, and identifying
and potentially acquiring an appropriate site, among others.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 57
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 46
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Recommendation 11.C. Consider adopting Comprehensive Plan policies, zoning updates, and
shoreline management updates that facilitate allowing a wider mix of land uses of all types in the
Commercial Waterfront (CW) zone. As demand for many office and retail uses ebbs (due to work-from-
home and online shopping trends), greater flexibility is needed for properties to find economically
stable and viable uses that will in turn support employment and commercial activity in the waterfront
and wider Downtown area.
Recommendation 11.D. The height limitations in the waterfront area (generally three-stories) are
likely to lock most buildings in place as they are today for the coming decades. Given that most
development is likely to take place via adaptive reuse, the City should consider adopting
Comprehensive Plan policies that support an adaptive reuse incentive program, which can provide
technical or financial assistance to property owners for design and engineering assessments; façade,
systems or interior improvements; seismic retrofits; or other building improvements. Good local
examples are in Vancouver and Tacoma.
Recommendation 11.E. Where new development or adaptive reuse projects are proposed adjacent
to the railroad, encourage buildings to incorporate soundproofing that mitigates the impacts of
railroad traffic. This could occur through updates to zoning standards, the locally adopted building
code, or education of permitting staff and applicants. Design standards should require that railroad-
facing frontages avoid blank walls, however, and should incorporate artwork, landscaping, and
modulated building design to provide a welcoming gateway to railroad passengers and visitors.
Recommendation 11.F. The height limitations in the waterfront area (generally three-stories) are
likely to lock most buildings in place as they are today for the coming decades. If the City is interested
in encouraging redevelopment or infill development of surface parking lots, consider adopting
Comprehensive Plan policies that support exploration of the tradeoffs of modest and strategic height
or density bonuses in exchange for desired land uses and public benefits/amenities, and which
consider view corridors.
Recommendation 11.G. Continue the legal efforts to finish the waterfront walkway.
Recommendation 11.H. Conduct a comprehensive parking study of the Downtown Waterfront area
between SR-104 and the shoreline to understand current utilization, find opportunities for
consolidated parking and shared parking, and analyze possible changes to parking regulations for off-
street and on-street parking. The study should consider differences between residential and non-
residential uses and the effects of priced parking. The study should include a comparison of the
amount of surface parking between Edmonds and similar downtown waterfronts such as, but not
limited to, Anacortes, Port Angeles, Bremerton, Port Townsend, and Kirkland.
Recommendation 11.I. Consider changing the Marina Beach Park land use designation from Master
Planned Development to Open Space and rezoning it from Commercial Waterfront to Public Use. This
would more accurately accommodate the use and purpose of the park as a public recreation site. The
redesignation and rezoning could potentially occur alongside similar actions for the Unocal Property
(see the recommendations in Section 3).
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 58
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 47
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Section 12 – Sources
Documents
Document No. 8005060198 and Reference No. R-1979-4, Agreement and Covenant Constituting a
Contract Rezone, (1998), City of Edmonds and Port of Edmonds.
Ordinance No. 3411 and Reference No. R-2002-38, Covenant Regarding Use and Future Development
(Contract Rezone), (2002), City of Edmonds and Union Oil Company of California.
Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan (2009), Exhibit 3-12, Washington State Department of
Transportation.
Final Vehicle Reservation System Predesign Study (2010), Washington State Ferries.
Edmonds City Council Resolution 1263 (2011).
Edmonds City Council Resolution 1280 (2012).
Memorandum: Cherry Point Coal Export Facility Rail Operations (2012), for City of Edmonds Public
Works by Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc.
Washington State Rail Plan: Integrated Freight and Passenger Rail Plan 2013-2035 (2014), Figure 4.3,
Washington State Department of Transportation.
Economic Evaluation of Regional Impacts for the Proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point
(2014), for the Puget Sound Regional Council by The PFM Group, Parametrix, and HR&A Advisors.
Letter (January 8, 2014), from Washington State Department of Transportation to City of Edmonds.
Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan, Volume 2, City of Edmonds Annex (September 2015),
Snohomish County.
Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (2016), City of Edmonds.
Letter (March 17, 2017), from Washington State Department of Transportation to City of Edmonds.
Letter (April 17, 2017), from City of Edmonds to Washington State Department of Transportation.
Sea Level Rise in Edmonds, WA: Expected Impacts & Recommended Actions (2017), project report by
Disaster Reduction and Emergency Planning Studio, ENVS 476, Western Washington University.
Topics Related to Restoration of the Edmonds Marsh (2017), project reports by Ecological Restoration
class, ESCI 470, Western Washington University.
New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master: East Side. Harbor Square Redevelopment
Plan (2014), Port of Edmonds.
Edmonds Waterfront Access Study (2016), for the City of Edmonds by Tetra Tech, Inc.
Expanded Marsh Concept Design and Hydraulic Modeling Report (2019), for the City of Edmonds
Public Works Department by Shannon and Wilson, Inc.
2020 Service Implementation Plan, (November 2019), Sound Transit.
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 59
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 48
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Washington State Ferries 2040 Long Range Plan (2019), Exhibit 5-6, Exhibit 5-5, Exhibit 5-6,
Washington State Department of Transportation.
Washington State Rail Plan 2019-2040 (2020), Washington State Department of Transportation.
Marina Beach Park & Willow Creek Daylighting Project (2020), PowerPoint by City of Edmonds Parks,
Recreation & Cultural Services.
Guide to the Quiet Zone Establishment Process (May 2020), Federal Railroad Administration.
https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2020-05/QuietZoneBrochure.pdf
National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance Rate Map, panel 1292 of 1575 (revised June 19,
2020), Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Comments to Save Our Marsh, document by Washington State Department of Transportation (August
13, 2020).
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan (November 17, 2020), City of Edmonds.
2021 Session Laws of the State of Washington, Chapter 333, Substitute Senate Bill 5165,
Transportation Budget, §213(5).
https://leg.wa.gov/CodeReviser/documents/sessionlaw/2021pam4.pdf#page=29
Media
Edmonds City Council pulls plug on beleaguered Harbor Square project (October 8, 2013), My
Edmonds News.
Council votes to kill controversial Edmonds Waterfront Connector project (June 19, 2019), My
Edmonds News.
Council agrees to zoning change that will allow hotels on Edmonds waterfront (February 9, 2021), My
Edmonds News.
BNSF Railway confirms plans to double track Edmonds in 2023, but key questions remain (September
6, 2021), My Edmonds News.
Video Calls
Note: Consultant firm names below are abbreviated. Full names are: MAKERS architecture and urban
design; Leland Consulting Group; and The Watershed Company.
Video calls with Washington State Department of Transportation and Washington State Ferries, City of
Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 12 and November 23, 2021).
Video call with Tulalip Tribes, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Watershed (October 18, 2021).
Video call with Sound Transit, City of Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 17, 2021).
Video call with Port of Edmonds, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Leland (October 19, 2021).
Video call with Community Transit, City of Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 19, 2021).
Video call with Save Our Marsh, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Watershed (October 19, 2021).
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 60
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project – Key Findings and Recommendations Memo
City of Edmonds | Development Services, Planning Division Page 49
Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714
Video call with JSH Properties, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Leland (October 20, 2021).
Video call with BNSF Railway, City of Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 22, 2021).
Video call with Lund Consulting, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Watershed (November 3, 2021).
Emails
Email from Edmonds staff (October 7, 2021).
Email from BNSF (October 15, 2021).
Email from Sound Transit (November 24, 2021).
Email from Washington State Department of Transportation and Washington State Ferries (November
22 and 23, 2021; February 8, 2022).
Email from Long Bay Enterprises Inc. (December 16, 2021).
Email from Washington State Department of Transportation (February 8, 2022).
Email from Community Transit (February 11, 2022).
Email from Washington State Department of Ecology (April 11, 2022).
Websites
Unocal Edmonds Bulk Fuel Terminal 0178, Washington State Department of Ecology.
https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/gsp/Sitepage.aspx?csid=5180
Edmonds Marsh, City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services.
https://edmondswa.gov/services/parks___rec/discovery_programs/explore_discovery_places/edmon
ds_marsh
Traffic Statistics, Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Ferries.
https://wsdot.wa.gov/travel/washington-state-ferries/about-us/washington-state-ferries-
planning/traffic-statistics
SalmonScape, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
https://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/salmonscape/map.html
The Train Horn Rule and Quiet Zones, Federal Railroad Administration.
https://railroads.dot.gov/highway-rail-crossing-and-trespasser-programs/train-horn-rulequiet-
zones/train-horn-rule-and-quiet
Washington Geological Information Portal, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Division of
Geology and Earth Resources.
https://geologyportal.dnr.wa.gov/2d-view#wigm?-13628270,-13619098,6072591,6077019
7.A.a
Packet Pg. 61
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
1
-
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
K
e
y
F
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
V
i
s
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
)
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
Waterfront Vision
Design Concept
Sept 11, 2024
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 62
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
❑Waterfront On-going Projects
❑Study Recommendations
❑Community Engagement Summary
❑Design Concept - Key Elements
❑Land use
❑Goals & Policies
2
Agenda 7.A.b
Packet Pg. 63
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 3
Components of Edmonds’ Waterfront
Harbor Square
Edmonds MarshUnocal Site
Marina Beach
Park
Edmonds Waterfront Center
Brackett’s Landing South
Olympic Beach
Edmonds Fishing Pier
Port of Edmonds
Marina & Boardwalk
Edmonds Amtrak
Station
Willow Creek
Ferry Terminal
The Puget Sound
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 64
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 4
Status of Waterfront On-Going Projects
Edmonds Crossing
New Ferry Terminal Project Cancelled
Marsh Restoration
Dependent on Unocal Property Clean Up
Transfer of Unocal Property
Site cleanup almost complete
Marina Beach Park improvements
Design and construction occurring 2024 -
2026 (Independent Masterplan)
Missing Pedestrian Walkway link
Litigation cleared Oct, 2023
Sound Transit Station Access Projects
Delayed
Bulkhead Reconstruction
Construction estimated to begin in 2025
BNSF Railway Double Tracking
Part of multi-year capital investment plan,
Timeline unknown
4
1
6
2
5
3
7
4
2
5
3
6
17
8
8
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 65
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 5
Top Recommendations from 2022 Council Briefing
1.Create a New Vision for the
Waterfront.
2.Recognize and Support the
Edmonds Ferry Terminal’s Current
Location.
3.Prioritize Edmonds Marsh & Willow
Creek Restoration.
4.Plan for Improved Emergency
Management of the Waterfront.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 66
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
Design Charette Recap
What we asked & What we heard
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 67
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 7
Key Themes
7
•what do you want the "vibe"
of the Waterfront area to be?
•What activities are preferred?
•what should be open to the
public and what is private?
•How do we connect The
Waterfront to Downtown
through Main St. and Dayton?
•Does this vision include more
residential? Retail? Civic
uses?
•How do we manage parking
here?
•How can we make the Marsh
publicly accessible and
protect the ecological
restoration?
•How do we keep the flora and
fauna safe?
•How do we keep visitors
safe?
•How do we transition and
integrate the Marsh into the
larger pedestrian network?
•How do we futureproof the
Marsh for climate change?
•How can we serve
emergency
services'needs?
•Do you think we need a
pedestrian bridge?
•What are the benefits vs
the costs?
•Let's talk about aesthetics.
What ideas are there for
design?
Future forward urban design Marsh and ecological
functionality of the waterfront
Waterfront
access/integration
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 68
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
Future Forward Urban
Design
What did we hear from the community?
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 69
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 9
Public realm
•Elevate pedestrian experience with signature
routes to parks, activity nodes and downtown
•Activate the waterfront family friendly activities.
•Seamlessly connect Brackett Landing and
Olympic Beach.
•Prioritize green space over vehicle
space;consolidate parking and reduce
impervious surface
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 70
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 10
Community Amenities & Recreation
Recreation: Dog parks, walking and biking trails, bird-watching.
Waterfront: Beach activities and experiences (kayaking, paddleboarding, boating), waterfront
seating, and umbrellas.
Civic amenities: Public parks, cultural centers, senior center, restrooms, first aid centers and
community spaces.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 71
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 11
Community Amenities & Recreation Continued
Community: Gathering spaces, cultural festivals, music, and seasonal events.
Family-Friendly: Kid-friendly activities; playful street furnishings, nature-based learning
History and Culture: Cultural walks, collaboration with local tribes on culturally appropriate art
and representation
Educational: Programs on environmental conservation and wildlife preservation
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 72
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 12
Aesthetics
•Support designs that blend with the surroundings while
preserving its unique identity and charm.
•Prioritize natural elements such as water features,
native vegetation, and scenic views to enhance the
overall aesthetic quality.
•Infuse artistic elements such as murals, sculptures,
and cultural exhibits reflecting local heritage and
character.
•Engage with local artists, architects and designers to
gather ideas on a design identity.
•Incorporate sustainable design such as green
infrastructure, solar energy, and recycled materials
•Balance aesthetics with functionality.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 73
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
2.Marsh and ecological
functionality of the waterfront
What did we hear from the community?
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 74
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 14
Marsh and Ecological Functionality
Make Marsh publicly accessible and promote ecological restoration
•Design elevated platforms, view pods, or
observation decks.
•Implement designated pathways to protect
flora and fauna and prevent habitat
destruction.
•Implement educational signage to inform
visitors about the importance of the marsh
ecosystem.
•Designate Marsh as an ‘Open space’ with
access to water, creating passive recreation –
a unique opportunity for Edmonds.
Cattail Marsh Wetlands Education Center | Beaumont,TX
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 75
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 15
Climate Resilience and Sustainability
•Address impacts of sea level rise, flooding,
and temperature changes.
•Establish natural buffers to mitigate sea level
rise and increased flooding.
•Collaborate with coastal and wetland
ecology experts
•Monitor and research climate impacts.
•Provide community education on climate
resilience and stewardship.
•Follow natural shoreline designs to absorb
waves and mitigate sea level rise effects.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 76
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
3.Waterfront Access and
Integration
What did we hear from the community?
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 77
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 17
Multi-modal Connectivity
•Concerns about traffic management, pedestrian
safety, and accessibility for people with disabilities.
•A multimodal hub to integrate ferry, bus,Amtrak, ride-
share, and bike facilities, with improved public transit,
and pedestrian-friendly amenities.
•Pedestrian access on SR104, better connections to
train, ferry station.
•Create signage and wayfinding systems that guide
pedestrians, highlighting its historic & ecological
significance.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 78
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 18
Managing Parking
•Expand pedestrian-only areas.
•Design parking areas with permeable surfaces,
GSI, and EV charging stations.
•Consider parking maximums and ensure ADA
access.
•Encourage micro-mobility (e-bikes, bike share,
scooter share)
•Consider innovative strategies for peak
demand periods (summer events)Suggested trolley route
Edmonds Way
surrounding destinations.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 79
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
Emergency access
•Plan for emergency access
routes and services to ensure public
safety.
•Collaboration among different
waterfront agencies for emergency
preparedness.
•Consider future technologies to help
access between the east & west
sides of the tracks.
Prepared By: Edmonds Police Department; Crime Analyst M. Reeves
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 80
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
Draft Design Concept
Staff approached the design based on Community’s ideas
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 81
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 21
Our Approach
Balancing People & Nature
•Re-building Marina Beach Park
•Re-imagine Port walk & Admiral Way
•Re-claiming Edmonds Marsh
View corridors
Universally accessible
Pedestrian connections
NEW Bike connections
Ease of
access to
Marina
Beach Park
Integrating green
pockets along the
waterfront
Enhancing the
view corridors
Safe network
from Downtown
to Waterfront
Activate Admiral way
New green pockets
Existing parks
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 82
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 22
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 83
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 23
Proposed Green Open Space
•Expand Edmonds Marsh.
•Add marsh boardwalk loop with viewing platforms and educational installations.
•Consolidate parking along the boardwalk and replace with public open space/ green spaces.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 84
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 24
Create a network of
accessible pathways and
trails that prioritize
pedestrians and connects
key destinations.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 85
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 25
Create a bike loop
to promote active
recreation and connects
key destinations
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 86
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 26
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 87
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 27
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 88
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 28
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 89
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 29
Proposed Open Spaces
1.New public plazas within Salish Crossing &
Harbor Square.
2.Extending the Port’s proposed plaza till the
Marsh to create a visual corridor.
3.Reconfigure Boat Parking to optimize efficiency
and allow additional uses and/or additional open
space.
4.Additional pocket parks, open spaces along the
boardwalk, and spaces for pop-up uses
connected by bike and pedestrian pathways.
5.Multi-Use path along Edmonds Way to Marsh.
6.Wide landscape promenade along the
boardwalk.
Harbor Square
Salish Crossing
Landscape promenade
Boat Parking
1 1
2
3
4
4
5
6
4
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 90
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 30
Continue to be the
regional leader in
protecting and expanding
natural resources
•Create “Edmonds
Marsh Visitor
Education Center”
•Enhance visitor
experience while
harmonizing with
surroundings
•Utilize natural
materials, low-impact
building techniques
and reflect the Pacific
Northwest aesthetic
Create viewing
platforms along the
boardwalk within the
Marsh with educational
signage and bird-watching
towers.
Create multi-modal
landscaped path
along Edmonds Way
THE MARSH
A boardwalk around the Marsh with viewing platforms, establishing
a ‘Restoration Education Center’or ‘Salmon Awareness Center.’
Build an ‘Education
Center’ to encourage
conservation, awareness
sustainability and
restoration.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 91
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 31
Significance of Underwater Dive Park
31
Explore opportunities to highlight the Underwater Dive
Park as a unique destination attracting visitors and
promoting marine conservation awareness.
•Install interpretive signage and educational displays to
highlight the unique features and significance of the
Underwater Dive Park.
•Permit and support local dive shops and organizations to
promote diving and snorkeling through guided tours and
instructional programs.
•Partner with schools, universities, and marine research
institutions to promote marine conservation, education, and
scientific research.
•Encourage activities that allow visitors to explore the marine
life and habitats of the Underwater Dive Park.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 92
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 93
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 33
Community Response
80 positive responses regarding community’s
likes about the concept vision
Dislikes:
•Strong opposition to the planned waterfront hotel.
•Significant concern about parking, with some
feeling that parking issues are being downplayed.
•Feasibility of a pedestrian tunnel.
•Need for better recognition and acknowledgment of
historical Indigenous presence
•Sea-level rise, there is concern about climate
change impacts.
•Protecting underwater ecosystems.
•Concerns about the overall costs and the
feasibility of moving forward with the plans.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 94
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 34
Existing Conditions: Zoning
Master Plan Hillside
Mixed-use Zones
MP1
35 feet 3 FAR Multi family Office, hotel,
restaurants, public
facilities
Master Plan Hillside
Mixed-use Zones
MP2
35 feet 4 FAR Multi family
(except ground
floor)
Neighborhood
oriented Retail,
Office, hotel,
restaurants, public
facilities
* Maximum height depends on roof design
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 95
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
Preliminary Concept Goals
The Edmonds waterfront is a vibrant, resilient, pedestrian-friendly recreational destination that
supports diverse activities, preserves ecological integrity, and promotes community well-being.
•Enhance pedestrian experiences and vibrant public realm.
•Create a continuous network of green spaces, pathways, and trails
•Preserve and enhance the waterfront's natural character
•Enhance ecological functionality and promote the restoration of natural habitats
•Promote educational awareness and community engagement
•Foster resilience and sustainability
•Address climate change impacts
•Promote long-term ecological health
•Improve public access to the shoreline
•Address safety concerns
•Implement effective parking management while encouraging multimodal integration
•Plan for comprehensive emergency access and preparedness
•Explore opportunities to highlight the Underwater Park as a unique destination
•Honor the Indigenous history, recognize the existing presence of Indigenous groups and build relationships
•Ensure context-appropriate future development
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 96
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update | 36
Implementation Strategies/Actions
Develop a sub-area plan with clear objectives, specific design guidelines, infrastructure plans, and
phased implementation strategies
Includes transportation studies and analysis to
•Identify potential locations to develop a multimodal transit hub
•Respond to growth and changing travel demands, improving connectivity for rail, ferry,
bus, bicycle, walking, and ridesharing.
•Improve connections from the waterfront to neighboring areas to increase visibility and
visitors
•Enhance connections to the regional transit system
•Conduct parking studies and develop a parking management plan
•Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port development.
Plan for future joint public/private development involving WSDOT , BNSF, Community Transit
for infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, development incentives, and
potential modifications to land use regulations.
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 97
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan Update |
Thank you!
EdmondsWA.gov/EveryonesEdmonds
everyonesedmonds@edmondswa.gov
425-775-0220
Scan the QR code to access the Design
charette/Concept discussion materials &
community poll results
7.A.b
Packet Pg. 98
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
2
-
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
(
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
W
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
n
t
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/11/2024
2025-2030 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Staff Lead: Angie Feser
Department: Parks, Recreation & Human Services
Prepared By: Angie Feser
Background/History
The City’s Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at
least the next six years, which support the City’s Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital
improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities to
accommodate the City’s projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act.
Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects. These preservation
projects are part of the six-year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan
projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects.
Staff Recommendation
Public Works and Parks & Recreation departments staff presentation, Planning Board questions and
answers and related discussion.
Narrative
The 2025-2030 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are being presented
with project lists that identify Capital Facility projects and project information sheets for all projects and
programs.
The Public Works and Utilities Department proposed 2025-2030 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 1.
The Parks & Recreation proposed 2025-2030 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 2.
With the city transitioning to a biennium operating budget format, the years alternating operating
budget adoption provide a better opportunity to review capital budgets in greater depth. Next year in
2025 there will be more time and staff capacity to review in detail, and incorporate, the 2024
Transportation Plan, the Storm and Surface Water Plan Update, as well as the 2024 Comprehensive Plan
(including a Facilities Element). Recommendations from these three significant plans, which will not be
completed for this year’s capital program review, will be instrumental in developing the 2026-2031
CFP/CIP Plans.
The next steps include a Planning Board Public Hearing scheduled for September 25, 2024. A summary
of this presentation will be provided and the Planning Board is requested to develop a recommendation
to City Council. Following the Planning Board’s action, the City Council will also hold a Public Hearing
scheduled in October prior to final approval and adoption.
Attachments:
7.B
Packet Pg. 99
Public Works and Utilities 2025-2030 CIP and CFP
2025-2030 Parks CIP_CFP DRAFT
7.B
Packet Pg. 100
PUBLIC WORKS
2025-2030
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN &
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 101
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
CONTENTS
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS
TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECT MAP
FACILITIES & WWTP PROJECT MAP
TRANSPORTATION
PRESERVATION/MAINTENANCE
SAFETY/CAPACITY ANALYSIS
NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION
FERRY PROJECTS
TRAFFIC CALMING
TRAFFIC PLANNING
GREEN STREETS
WATER
STORMWATER
EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION
PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT
ANNUALLY FUNDED
COMPLIANCE RELATED
SEWER
FACILITIES
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 102
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
PWD-04 PWT-27 PWT-28
PWT-34 PWT-24 PWW-09 PWD-05 PWT-61
PWT-49 PWT-03 PWT-68
PWT-46
PWT-05 PWT-17
PWT-40
PWT-42 PWT-07 PWT-18 PWT-65 PWT-04 PWT-33 PWT-36 PWW-09 PWT-51 PWD-01 PWD-02 PWT-09 PWT-12 PWT-45
PWT-37 PWT-35 PWT-16 PWT-48 PWT-19 PWT-55
PWT-41 PWT-11
PWT-25 PWT-15 PWT-22PWT-20 PWT-08 PWT-21
PWT-29 PWT-20 PWT-14 PWT-13 PWT-30 PWT-47 PWT-32 PWT-31 PWT-06 PWT-23 PWT-64 PWT-50 PWS-11 PWT-06 PWD-07PWD-06PWT-26 PWD-22 PWT-10 PWT-43
Public Works & Utilities Department
TRANSPORTATION &
UTILITY PROJECTS MAP
Projects
Sewer
Stormwater
Street/Intersection Project
Non-Motorized Transportation Project
Water
Sewer
Street/Intersection Project
Non-Motorized Transportation Project
¯
*Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown.
ii
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 103
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
PWP 0
WM
ST
AIN
VES MAIN
SUNSETA
ED
M
O
N
D
S
W
A
Y
N
A
V
E
ST 3RD
MAIN ST
AVE
S
3
R
5T
H
A
V
E
S
Public Works & Utilities Department
FACILITIES &
WWTP PROJECTS MAP
Projects
Facilities
WWTP
¯
*Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown.
PWP-06
PWP-04
D
PWF-07 PWF-01
PWF-16PWF-03 PWF-09PWF-10
PWF-13 - 5PWP-07 PWF-06
PWF-07 PWF-01PWF-09PWF-04 PWF-16PWF-03 PWF-05PWF-10PWP-06PWP-05PWP-04 PWF-23 PWF-11PWF-13PWP-07
PWF-22
PWF-17
PWF-18 PWF-16
PWF-02
PWF-08
PWF-12
PWF-11PWF-23 PWF-05
iii
PWF-24
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 104
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
TRANSPORTATION
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 1
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 105
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
TRANSPORTATION
#CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
PRESERVATION/ MAINTENANCE
PWT-01 Annual Street Preservation Program $1,801,800 $855,400 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $0 $10,547,200 $0 $10,547,200
PWT-04 Main St Overlay from 6th Ave to 8th Ave $642,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $642,020 $0 $642,020
PWT-05 Puget Dr @ OVD Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $526,000 $0 $621,000 $0 $621,000
PWT-06 Signal Upgrades - 100th Ave @ 238th St SW $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $820,000 $0 $995,000 $0 $995,000
PWT-07 Main St @ 3rd Signal Upgrades $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $406,000 $0 $523,000 $0 $523,000
PWT-61 Olympic View Dr Overlay - 196th / SR-524 to
Talbot Rd $484,000 $963,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,447,700 $0 $1,447,700
PWT-68 88th Avenue Overlay and Sidewalk Repair $1,180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,180,000 $0 $1,180,000
SAFETY/ CAPACITY ANALYSIS
PWT-08 228th St SW from Hwy 99 to 95th Pl W Corridor $0 $0 $0 $1,533,000 $2,650,000 $13,900,000 $18,083,000 $0 $18,083,000
PWT-09 Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage
2 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000
PWT-10 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 3 $1,984,000 $1,683,000 $2,489,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $25,763,000 $0 $25,763,000
PWT-11 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 4 $825,000 $1,620,000 $5,000,000 $4,955,000 $13,100,000 $10,000,000 $35,500,000 $0 $35,500,000
PWT-12 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 5 $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $1,060,000 $2,090,000 $3,680,000 $46,293,000 $49,973,000
PWT-13 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000 $22,500,000
PWT-14 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900,000 $42,900,000
PWT-15 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,500,000 $37,500,000
PWT-16 Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 9 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000 $22,500,000
PWT-17
196th St SW / 88th Ave W - Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $279,000 $252,000 $835,000 $1,366,000 $0 $1,366,000
2
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 106
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
TRANSPORTATION
#CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
PWT-18 Main St @ 9th Ave Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $210,000 $1,157,000 $0 $1,367,000 $0 $1,367,000
PWT-19
76th Ave W @ 220th St SW - Intersection
Improvements $198,000 $1,488,500 $2,100,000 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0 $10,456,500 $0 $10,456,500
PWT-20 SR-104 Adaptive System - 236th to 226th $67,740 $0 $0 $3,515,000 $0 $0 $3,582,740 $0 $3,582,740
PWT-21
SR-104 @ 100th Ave W Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,350,000 $2,650,000 $4,200,000 $0 $4,200,000
PWT-22 SR-104 @ 95th Pl W Intersection Improvements $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $242,000 $0 $287,000 $0 $287,000
PWT-23
SR-104 @ 238th St SW Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $241,000 $1,370,000 $0 $1,611,000 $0 $1,611,000
PWT-24
Olympic View Dr @ 76th Ave W Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,428,000 $1,428,000
PWT-25 84th Ave W (212th St SW to 238th St SW)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,672,000 $18,672,000
PWT-26
SR-104 @ 76th Ave W Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,630,000 $3,630,000
PWT-27
Olympic View Dr @ 174th St SW Intersection
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $758,000 $758,000
PWT-28 175th St SW Slope Repair $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $1,060,000
PWT-59 Traffic Signal Program $30,280 $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,560 $0 $60,560
PWT-70 Safety Action Plan $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $375,000
NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION
PWT-29 232nd St SW Walkway from 100th Ave to SR-104 $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 $1,572,000 $1,856,000 $0 $1,856,000
PWT-30
236th St SW Walkway from Madrona Elem to
97th Ave W $0 $0 $0 $313,000 $1,794,000 $0 $2,107,000 $0 $2,107,000
PWT-31
236th St SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave
W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,054,000 $2,054,000
PWT-32
84th Ave W Walkway from 238th St SW to 234th
St SW $100,000 $0 $0 $625,000 $2,550,000 $0 $3,275,000 $0 $3,275,000
PWT-33
80th Ave W Walkway from 212th St SW to 206th
St SW $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $127,000 $1,433,000 $1,677,000 $0 $1,677,000
3
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 107
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
TRANSPORTATION
#CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
PWT-34
80th Ave W Walkway from 188th St SW to
Olympic View Dr $0 $0 $0 $511,000 $1,962,000 $0 $2,473,000 $0 $2,473,000
PWT-35
218th St SW Walkway from 76th Ave W to 84th
Ave W $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $1,563,000 $0 $1,843,000 $0 $1,843,000
PWT-36 Walnut St Walkway from 6th Ave S to 7th Ave S $0 $0 $0 $308,000 $0 $0 $308,000 $0 $308,000
PWT-37
216th St SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 72nd Ave
W $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $0 $0 $233,000 $0 $233,000
PWT-39 Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
PWT-40
Maplewood Dr Walkway from Main St to 200th St
SW $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $233,000 $2,662,000 $3,128,000 $0 $3,128,000
PWT-41
95th Pl W Walkway from 224th St SW to 220th St
SW $0 $0 $0 $139,000 $775,000 $0 $914,000 $0 $914,000
PWT-43
SR-104 & 76th Non-Motorized Transportation
Improvements $0 $0 $0 $277,000 $1,389,000 $0 $1,666,000 $0 $1,666,000
PWT-45
SR-104 Walkway HAWK to Pine/Pine from SR-
104 to 9th $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,473,000 $3,473,000 $0 $3,473,000
PWT-46 191st St SW from 80th Ave W to 76th Ave W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $762,000 $762,000
PWT-47
104th Ave W / Robinhood Ln from 238th St to
106th Ave W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,192,000 $1,192,000
PWT-48 80th Ave W from 218th St SW to 220th St SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $365,000 $365,000
PWT-49 84th Ave W from 188th St SW to 186th St SW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $369,000 $369,000
PWT-50 238th St SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave W $0 $0 $0 $211,000 $1,234,000 $0 $1,445,000 $0 $1,445,000
PWT-55 Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000
PWT-60 Pedestrian Safety Program $20,180 $20,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,360 $0 $40,360
PWT-66 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $8,000,000
FERRY RELATED
PWT-51
Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St to
Dayton St $0 $0 $0 $403,000 $0 $0 $403,000 $0 $403,000
4
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 108
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
TRANSPORTATION
#CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
TRAFFIC CALMING
PWT-52 Traffic Calming Program $80,650 $80,650 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $233,300 $270,000 $503,300
TRAFFIC PLANNING
PWT-53 ADA Transition Plan (Right-of-Way) Update $0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $440,000
PWT-54 Transportation Plan Update $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,000
GREEN STREETS
PWT-64
Green Streets 236th St SW - 84th Ave W to
Highway 99 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,710,000 $3,710,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $7,853,670 $6,741,710 $12,237,000 $34,063,000 $51,399,000 $44,633,000 $156,927,380 $204,903,000 $361,830,380
Funding Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
Federal Grants $1,351,200 $2,507,500 $4,463,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,321,700 $0 $8,321,700
Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax & Multi-Modal) $168,595 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $168,595 $0 $168,595
Fund 125 - REET $836,465 $295,200 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $0 $3,381,665 $0 $3,381,665
Fund 126 - REET $2,037,610 $772,610 $768,000 $1,243,000 $768,000 $18,000 $5,607,220 $270,000 $5,877,220
Fund 421 - Water Utility $212,000 $194,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $406,400 $0 $406,400
Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $501,000 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $507,500 $0 $507,500
Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $236,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $236,800 $0 $236,800
State Grants $2,486,000 $2,683,000 $2,547,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $27,323,000 $0 $27,323,000
Traffic Impact Fees $24,000 $198,500 $283,500 $0 $0 $0 $506,000 $0 $506,000
Transportation Impact Fees $0 $84,000 $2,295,500 $475,000 $0 $0 $2,854,500 $0 $2,854,500
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $1,130,000 $21,595,000 $40,274,000 $44,615,000 $107,614,000 $204,633,000 $312,247,000
FUNDING TOTAL $7,853,670 $6,741,710 $12,237,000 $34,063,000 $51,399,000 $44,633,000 $156,927,380 $204,903,000 $361,830,380
5
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 109
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Description Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets.
$1,800,000 (2025)
ANNUAL STREET
PRESERVATION
PROGRAM
PWT-01
*includes prior year expenditures
Maintains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital
investment to rebuild City steets.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$110,000 $110,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $0 $0Design
$1,691,800 $745,400 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0Construction
$855,400 $2,630,000Expense Total $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $0$0$1,801,800
$732,500 $295,200 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET
$732,500 $377,800 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET
$200,000 $182,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 421 - Water Utility
$136,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$0 $0 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$855,400 $2,630,000Funding Source Total $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $0$0$1,801,800
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 6
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 110
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The project will provide a full-width grind and pavement overlay of Main St. from 6th
Ave to 8th Ave. This project also includes upgrading all non-compliant ADA pedestrian
curb ramps within the project limits, an eastbound bike lane and westbound bike
sharrow markings.
$1,700,000
MAIN ST OVERLAY
FROM 6TH AVE TO 8TH
AVE
PWT-04
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and bike
safety on this segment of Main Street.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$642,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$642,020
$84,820 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET
$557,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Federal Grants
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$642,020
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 7
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 111
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The project will rebuild the existing traffic signal and remove the signal heads currently
on span wire and install standard traffic signal poles with mast arms. Vehicle detention
will also be upgraded as part of this project.
$621,000
PUGET DR @ OVD
SIGNAL UPGRADES
PWT-05
*includes prior year expenditures
This upgrade will provide safer roadway conditions since the hanging signal heads will
be replaced with fixed signal heads on mast arms. The new vehicle detection will
guarantee that all vehicles will be detected.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $526,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $95,000 $526,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $95,000 $526,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $95,000 $526,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 8
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 112
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system.
$995,000
SIGNAL UPGRADES -
100TH AVE @ 238TH
ST SW
PWT-06
*includes prior year expenditures
The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $820,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $175,000 $820,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $175,000 $820,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $175,000 $820,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 9
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 113
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system.
$523,000
MAIN ST @ 3RD SIGNAL
UPGRADES
PWT-07
*includes prior year expenditures
The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $117,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $406,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $117,000 $406,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $117,000 $406,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $117,000 $406,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 10
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 114
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Pavement overlay along Olympic View Dr, from 196th St. SW / SR-524 to Talbot Road,
along with ADA pedestrian curb ramp upgrades.
$1,500,000
OLYMPIC VIEW DR
OVERLAY - 196TH / SR-
524 TO TALBOT RD
PWT-61
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve pavement condition and improve accessibility for pedestrians of all abilities.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$100,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$384,000 $948,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$963,700 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$484,000
$484,000 $263,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET
$0 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Federal Grants
$963,700 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$484,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 11
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 115
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This project will resurface 88th Ave and improve the existing asphalt sidewalk on the
east side of 88th Ave from 196th St SW to 185th Pl SW in the Seaview neighborhood.
All City utilities along this section of 88th Ave have been upgraded in recent years and
the street is ready to pave. The existing curb is in poor condition and varies in height.
The project will install 6” concrete vertical curbs and repave the existing asphalt
sidewalk.
$1,180,000
88TH AVENUE
OVERLAY AND
SIDEWALK REPAIR
PWT-68
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and
pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$1,070,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$1,180,000
$585,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET
$495,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$1,180,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 12
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 116
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
SAFETY/ CAPACITY ANALYSIS
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 13
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 117
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th Pl. W to three lanes (with center two-way left
turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes.
$18,083,000
228TH ST SW FROM
HWY 99 TO 95TH PL W
CORRIDOR
PWT-08
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this
corridor. Community Transit will evaluate the possibility of creating a new east-west bus
route along 228th St. SW, if this project moves forward (connecting Edmonds Transit
Station to Mountlake Terrace Transit Station).
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $1,533,000 $1,590,000 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,900,000 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $1,533,000 $2,650,000 $0$13,900,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $1,533,000 $2,650,000 $13,900,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $1,533,000 $2,650,000 $0$13,900,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 14
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 118
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description In 2023, the project constructed landscaped center medians on Highway 99 from 244th
St. SW to 212th St. SW, a HAWK signal ~ 600’ north of 234th St. SW, and gateway
signs on both ends of the corridor. Plant establishment was completed in 2024. The
project close-out will be completed in 2025.
$9,400,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION &
GATEWAY PROJECT -
STAGE 2
PWT-09
*includes prior year expenditures
The conversion of the center two-way left turn lane to a landscaped raised median will
improve corridor safety along this Highway of Regional Significance (HRS), with an
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of ~ 35,000 vehicles per day. The new HAWK signal will
provide a signalized pedestrian crossing between the existing traffic signals at 238th St
and 228th St.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$15,000
$15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0State Grants
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$15,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 15
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 119
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits are from 244th St SW to 238th St. SW. The
project will provide new sidewalk, landscaped planter strips, street lighting, separated
bike lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with
potential undergrounding of overhead utility lines). The project will also widen the
intersection of Highway 99 and 238th St. SW to provide a second northbound left turn
lane widen 238th St. from Highway 99 to 84th Ave.
$27,500,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 3
PWT-10
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this segment of the Hwy 99
corridor.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$1,100,000 $799,000 $257,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$884,000 $884,000 $2,232,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0Construction
$1,683,000 $2,489,000Expense Total $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0$0$1,984,000
$1,984,000 $1,683,000 $2,489,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0State Grants
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$1,683,000 $2,489,000Funding Source Total $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0$0$1,984,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 16
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 120
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits are from 224th St SW to 220th St. SW. The
project will provide new sidewalk, landscaped planter strips, street lighting, separated
bike lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with
potential undergrounding of overhead utility lines). The project will also widen the
intersection of Highway 99 and 220th St. SW to provide a second left turn lane for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound movements.
$37,000,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 4
PWT-11
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$825,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $475,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $620,000 $4,000,000 $4,480,000 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $13,100,000 $10,000,000 $0Construction
$1,620,000 $5,000,000Expense Total $4,955,000 $13,100,000 $0$10,000,000$825,000
$0 $84,000 $2,295,500 $475,000 $0 $0 $0Transportation Impact Fees
$338,000 $536,000 $2,646,500 $0 $0 $0 $0Federal Grants
$487,000 $1,000,000 $58,000 $0 $0 $0 $0State Grants
$0 $0 $0 $4,480,000 $13,100,000 $10,000,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$1,620,000 $5,000,000Funding Source Total $4,955,000 $13,100,000 $0$10,000,000$825,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 17
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 121
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on
both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted
utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and
other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
$49,700,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 5
PWT-12
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development will be improved along the corridor.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $530,000 $1,060,000 $1,590,000 $1,689,000Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $4,188,000Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,416,000Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $530,000 $1,060,000 $46,293,000$2,090,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $530,000 $1,060,000 $2,090,000 $46,293,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $530,000 $1,060,000 $46,293,000$2,090,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 18
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 122
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Along Hwy 99 from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on
both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted
utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and
other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
$22,500,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 6
PWT-13
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $22,500,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $22,500,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 19
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 123
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Along Hwy 99 from 234th St. SW to 228th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on
both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted
utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and
other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
$42,900,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 7
PWT-14
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $42,900,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $42,900,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 20
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 124
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Along Hwy 99 from 228th St. SW to 224th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on
both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted
utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and
other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds.
$37,500,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 8
PWT-15
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,500,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $37,500,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,500,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $37,500,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 21
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 125
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Along Hwy 99 from approximately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW to 216th St. SW, the
project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street lighting, better
stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of
overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as
being in Edmonds.
$22,500,000
HWY 99
REVITALIZATION
PROJECT - STAGE 9
PWT-16
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic
development would be improved along the corridor.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $22,500,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $22,500,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 22
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 126
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling in
the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and southbound
traffic to right-turn-only (prohibiting left-turn and through movements) would also
address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative
as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council.
This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until traffic
signal warrants are met. The existing LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This
project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plan.
$1,366,000
196TH ST SW / 88TH
AVE W -
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-17
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement
would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St. SW.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $279,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $252,000 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $835,000 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $279,000 $252,000 $0$835,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $279,000 $252,000 $835,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $279,000 $252,000 $0$835,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 23
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 127
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Installation of a traffic signal or mini-roundabout. The project ranked #4 in the
Roadway Project Priority of the 2015 Transportation Plan. The preliminary cost
estimate for a new traffic signal is $1,290,000. A conceptual cost estimate for a mini-
roundabout is $500,000.
$1,367,000
MAIN ST @ 9TH AVE
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-18
*includes prior year expenditures
The existing intersection is stop-controlled for all approaches and the projected
intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City’s concurrency standards: LOS D).
The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $210,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,157,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $210,000 $1,157,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $210,000 $1,157,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $210,000 $1,157,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 24
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 128
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through/ right turn lane. Add
eastbound and westbound dedicated left turn lanes with a protected-permitted phase.
Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase.
Additional improvements include wider sidewalk, bike lanes, street lighting, and various
utility improvements (including potential conversion overhead utility lines to
underground). ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan .
$11,000,000
76TH AVE W @ 220TH
ST SW -
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-19
*includes prior year expenditures
Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2050 would
be improved from LOS F to LOS D. Improve active transportation conditions for
pedestrians and bicycle riders.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$198,000 $253,500 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $1,235,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0 $0Construction
$1,488,500 $2,100,000Expense Total $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0$0$198,000
$24,000 $198,500 $283,500 $0 $0 $0 $0Traffic Impact Fees
$12,000 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 421 - Water Utility
$6,000 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$156,000 $1,271,500 $1,816,500 $0 $0 $0 $0Federal Grants
$0 $0 $0 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$1,488,500 $2,100,000Funding Source Total $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0$0$198,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 25
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 129
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The project will add a traffic signal adaptive system on a 1.25-mile segment of SR104
from 236th St to 226th St. The system will monitor and synchronize the timing of five
existing signalized intersections (SR104 @ 236th St, SR104 @ 232nd St, SR104 @
95th Pl, SR104 @ 100th Ave, SR104 @ 226th St) and improve traffic flows along
SR104.
$4,000,000
SR-104 ADAPTIVE
SYSTEM - 236TH TO
226TH
PWT-20
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor with a current Average Daily Traffic
(ADT) of ~ 25,000 vehicles per day.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$67,740 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $3,515,000 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $3,515,000 $0 $0$0$67,740
$58,595 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax &
Multi-Modal)
$9,145 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET
$0 $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET
$0 $0 $0 $3,040,000 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $3,515,000 $0 $0$0$67,740
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 26
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 130
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid-block pedestrian crossing
along 100th Ave. W, improve safety to access the driveways within proximity to the
intersection, and re-striping of 100th Ave. W with the potential addition of bike lanes.
This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis
(completed in 2015).
$4,200,000
SR-104 @ 100TH AVE W
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-21
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve active transportation safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $200,000 $250,000 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,650,000 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $200,000 $1,350,000 $0$2,650,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,350,000 $2,650,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $200,000 $1,350,000 $0$2,650,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 27
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 131
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. This project
was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
$287,000
SR-104 @ 95TH PL W
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-22
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $242,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $45,000 $242,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $45,000 $242,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $45,000 $242,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 28
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 132
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install traffic signal. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridor
Analysis (completed in 2015).
$1,611,000
SR-104 @ 238TH ST SW
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-23
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $241,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,370,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $241,000 $1,370,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $241,000 $1,370,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $241,000 $1,370,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 29
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 133
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements).
(ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11).
$1,428,000
OLYMPIC VIEW DR @
76TH AVE W
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-24
*includes prior year expenditures
The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is
LOS F in 2035, which is below the City’s concurrency standards (LOS D). The project
will improve the Level of Service to LOS B.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244,000Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,184,000Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $1,428,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,428,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $1,428,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 30
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 134
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each side
of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan).
$18,672,000
84TH AVE W (212TH ST
SW TO 238TH ST SW)
PWT-25
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve traffic flow, access and active transportation uses by installing a center two
way left turn lane, sidewalks, bike lanes and street lighting.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,380,000Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,292,000Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $18,672,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,672,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $18,672,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 31
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 135
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Add a second westbound left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in the
SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015).
$3,630,000
SR-104 @ 76TH AVE W
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-26
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve access, safety and delay at the intersection.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $541,000Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,089,000Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $3,630,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,630,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $3,630,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 32
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 136
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50’ storage length. Shift
the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left
turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay.
(ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13)
$758,000
OLYMPIC VIEW DR @
174TH ST SW
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-27
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,000Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $631,000Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $758,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $758,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $758,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 33
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 137
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The project will stabilize the roadway subgrade and embankment and rebuild the
damaged pavement on 175th St. SW.
$1,060,000
175TH ST SW SLOPE
REPAIR
PWT-28
*includes prior year expenditures
Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankment.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $1,060,000 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $1,060,000 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 34
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 138
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This program started in 2019 and will provide new signal upgrades, such as vehicle
detection at intersections, new vehicle/pedestrian head equipment and other signal-
related upgrades. These improvements will improve the safety of the City’s
transportation system.
$30,280
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
PROGRAM
PWT-59
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve reliability of traffic signal operation.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$29,280 $29,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$30,280 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$30,280
$30,280 $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET
$30,280 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$30,280
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 35
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 139
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description A comprehensive safety plan aimed at reducing and eliminating serious-injury and fatal
crashes affecting all roadway users. In order to qualify for future Infrastructure
Implementation Grant or Planning / Demonstration Grant (through Safe Streets for All /
SS4A0, the projec needs to be identified in this plan.
$375,000
SAFETY ACTION PLAN
PWT-70
*includes prior year expenditures
Complete this document so safety projects for all modes of transportation can be
completed (by securing future grants).Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$375,000
$300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Federal Grants
$75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax &
Multi-Modal)
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$375,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 36
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 140
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 37
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 141
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranked
#3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan.
$1,856,000
232ND ST SW
WALKWAY FROM
100TH AVE TO SR-104
PWT-29
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,572,000 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $284,000 $0$1,572,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 $1,572,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $284,000 $0$1,572,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 38
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 142
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary to
97th Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation
Plan.
$2,107,000
236TH ST SW
WALKWAY FROM
MADRONA ELEM TO
97TH AVE W
PWT-30
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $313,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,794,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $313,000 $1,794,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $313,000 $1,794,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $313,000 $1,794,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 39
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 143
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked
#10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
$2,054,000
236TH ST SW
WALKWAY FROM HWY
99 TO 76TH AVE W
PWT-31
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $293,000Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,761,000Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $2,054,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,054,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $2,054,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 40
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 144
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The walkway project proposed approximately 1,000 LF of new sidewalk on the east
side of 84th Ave W with ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps.
$3,325,000
84TH AVE W
WALKWAY FROM
238TH ST SW TO
234TH ST SW
PWT-32
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$100,000 $0 $0 $296,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $329,000 $0 $0 $0ROW
$0 $0 $0 $0 $2,550,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $625,000 $2,550,000 $0$0$100,000
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET
$0 $0 $0 $625,000 $2,550,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $625,000 $2,550,000 $0$0$100,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 41
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 145
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St. SW with curb and
gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
$1,677,000
80TH AVE W
WALKWAY FROM
212TH ST SW TO
206TH ST SW
PWT-33
*includes prior year expenditures
The improvements will improve active transportation safety (including for school kids
due to proximity of several schools).Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $117,000 $127,000 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,433,000 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $117,000 $127,000 $0$1,433,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $117,000 $127,000 $1,433,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $117,000 $127,000 $0$1,433,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 42
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 146
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #13
in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
$2,473,000
80TH AVE W
WALKWAY FROM
188TH ST SW TO
OLYMPIC VIEW DR
PWT-34
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $511,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,962,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $511,000 $1,962,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $511,000 $1,962,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $511,000 $1,962,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 43
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 147
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W with curb and
gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
$1,843,000
218TH ST SW
WALKWAY FROM 76TH
AVE W TO 84TH AVE W
PWT-35
*includes prior year expenditures
The improvements will improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $280,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,563,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $280,000 $1,563,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $280,000 $1,563,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $280,000 $1,563,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 44
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 148
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk on the south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S. This
project is ranked #9 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
$308,000
WALNUT ST WALKWAY
FROM 6TH AVE S TO
7TH AVE S
PWT-36
*includes prior year expenditures
This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $53,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $255,000 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $308,000 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $308,000 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $308,000 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 45
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 149
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install 150’ sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W
(completing a missing link on north side of 216th St. SW). This project is ranked #3 in
the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan).
$233,000
216TH ST SW
WALKWAY FROM HWY
99 TO 72ND AVE W
PWT-37
*includes prior year expenditures
To provide a safe and desirable walking route.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $198,000 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $233,000 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $233,000 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $233,000 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 46
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 150
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The project will add bike lanes or sharrows on the following streets:
• 100th Ave/9th Ave from 244th St to Walnut St
• Walnut/Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave to 84th Ave
• 228th St. from 76th Ave to 80th Ave
• Bike sharrows on 80th Ave from 228th St. to 220th St.
Pedestrian crossing improvements including curb ramps, rectangular rapid flashing
beacons (RRFB) and signing will be installed at 100th Ave & 224th St, 9th Ave & Pine
St, Bowdoin Way& 96th Ave and Bowdoin Way & Pioneer Way. The project is currently
in the construction phase and completion will be subject to available weather in Fall
2023. Staff assumes grant funds will be spent in 2023. Project close-out is scheduled
for 2025.
$2,800,000
CITYWIDE BICYCLE
IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT
PWT-39
*includes prior year expenditures
This project will create new bike connections to various destination points throughout
the City (such as schools, parks, Downtown, Sound Transit Station). Sound Transit
awarded the grant to fund improvements that will provide more convenient access so
that more people can use Sound Transit services.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$10,000
$10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 125 - REET
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$10,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 47
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 151
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW (~ 2,700’). A
sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to
Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015
Transportation Plan).
$3,128,000
MAPLEWOOD DR
WALKWAY FROM MAIN
ST TO 200TH ST SW
PWT-40
*includes prior year expenditures
Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. SW
and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non-motorized transportation to walk to / from
school.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $233,000 $233,000 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,662,000 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $233,000 $233,000 $0$2,662,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $233,000 $233,000 $2,662,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $233,000 $233,000 $0$2,662,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 48
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 152
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 95th Pl. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW with curb and
gutter. This project ranked #8 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
$914,000
95TH PL W WALKWAY
FROM 224TH ST SW TO
220TH ST SW
PWT-41
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $139,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $775,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $139,000 $775,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $139,000 $775,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $139,000 $775,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 49
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 153
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in northbound and southbound
directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb ramps.
$1,666,000
SR-104 & 76TH NON-
MOTORIZED
TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS
PWT-43
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve active transportation safety along this section of the Interurban Trail and across
SR-104.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $277,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,389,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $277,000 $1,389,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $277,000 $1,389,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $277,000 $1,389,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 50
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 154
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb ramps along SR-104 from the HAWK signal to
Pine St and along Pine St from SR-104 to 9th Ave S
$3,473,000
SR-104 WALKWAY
HAWK TO PINE/PINE
FROM SR-104 TO 9TH
PWT-45
*includes prior year expenditures
This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along
3rd Ave. S to Downtown Edmonds and City Park.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $579,000 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,894,000 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$3,473,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,473,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$3,473,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 51
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 155
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave., with curb and
gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
$762,000
191ST ST SW FROM
80TH AVE W TO 76TH
AVE W
PWT-46
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $762,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $762,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $762,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $762,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 52
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 156
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th Ave. W, with curb and
gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation
Plan.
$1,192,000
104TH AVE W /
ROBINHOOD LN FROM
238TH ST TO 106TH
AVE W
PWT-47
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,192,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $1,192,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,192,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $1,192,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 53
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 157
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST. SW, with curb and
gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation
Plan.
$365,000
80TH AVE W FROM
218TH ST SW TO
220TH ST SW
PWT-48
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $365,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $365,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $365,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $365,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 54
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 158
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW., with curb and
gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
$369,000
84TH AVE W FROM
188TH ST SW TO
186TH ST SW
PWT-49
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $369,000Design, ROW, and
Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $369,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $369,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $369,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 55
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 159
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked
#10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan.
$1,445,000
238TH ST SW FROM
HWY 99 TO 76TH AVE
W
PWT-50
*includes prior year expenditures
This project would improve pedestrian safety.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $211,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,234,000 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $211,000 $1,234,000 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $211,000 $1,234,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $211,000 $1,234,000 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 56
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 160
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The walkway project is ranked #6 on the short walkway list from the 2015
Transportation Plan. The project constructed approximately 700 feet of new sidewalk,
six pedestrian curb ramps and modify the existing stormwater system on Elm Way
between 8th Ave. S and 9th Ave. S. Project close-out in 2025.
$1,000,000
ELM WAY WALKWAY
FROM 8TH AVE. S TO
9TH AVE. S
PWT-55
*includes prior year expenditures
The project will improve pedestrian safety and provide a missing link of sidewalk on Elm
Way between 8th Ave and 9th Ave.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$5,000
$5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$5,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 57
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 161
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This program started in 2019 and will provide pedestrian safety improvements, such as
additional signage / stripng, flashing LED’s around stop signs, or other improvements.
These improvements will improve the safety of the City’s transportation system.
$20,180
PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
PROGRAM
PWT-60
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve safety at pedestrian crossings.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$19,180 $19,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$20,180 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$20,180
$20,180 $20,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 126 - REET
$20,180 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$20,180
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 58
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 162
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Final design of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to include site design and construction
documents for a safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public right
of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main
Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concept
was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork “Luminous Forest”, as well as
preliminary design development through 2020-21. Funding for this project has not been
secured at this time. The 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Project is managed by the
Community Services/Economic Development Department.
$9,206,600
4TH AVENUE
CULTURAL CORRIDOR
PWT-66
*includes prior year expenditures
The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic
and provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown retail.
Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor and contribute
to the economic vitality in downtown. The project has been supported by the community
in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and in the goals and priorities for the State
certified Creative District. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and
Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0$6,000,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0$6,000,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 59
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 163
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
FERRY RELATED
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 60
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 164
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users.
$403,000
FERRY STORAGE
IMPROVEMENTS FROM
PINE ST TO DAYTON ST
PWT-51
*includes prior year expenditures
Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $61,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $342,000 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $403,000 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $403,000 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $403,000 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 61
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 165
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
TRAFFIC CALMING
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 62
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 166
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Install traffic calming devices along selected stretches throughout the City with
speeding issues (through completion of detailed evaluation). This ongoing annual
program started in 2015 and is included in the City's 6-year Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
$80,650
TRAFFIC CALMING
PROGRAM
PWT-52
*includes prior year expenditures
Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that qualify under the City's Traffic Calming
Policy.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$10,000 $10,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $15,000Design
$70,650 $70,650 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $255,000Construction
$80,650 $18,000Expense Total $18,000 $18,000 $270,000$18,000$80,650
$80,650 $80,650 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $270,000Fund 126 - REET
$80,650 $18,000Funding Source Total $18,000 $18,000 $270,000$18,000$80,650
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 63
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 167
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
TRAFFIC PLANNING
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 64
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 168
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The 2017 Transition Plan completed an ADA evaluation and prioritization of the City’s
street right-of-way. This decision package will update the 2017 plan and expand the
evaluation to include City Buildings and Parks facilities. The Plan will inventory
physical barriers preventing accessibility and develop actions and preliminary cost
estimates to address ADA non-compliance.
$440,000
ADA TRANSITION
PLAN (RIGHT-OF-WAY)
UPDATE
PWT-53
*includes prior year expenditures
Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City right of way, as well as City buildings
and parks facilities.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0Expense Total $440,000 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $440,000 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 65
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 169
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan and is being updated in coordination with the 2024
Comprehensive Plan Update. The plan was last updated in 2015.
The Transportation Plan Update will be completed in Fall 2024. The funding in 2025 will
develop the new multi-modal impact fee and provide staff training on implementing the
program on private development projects.
$406,000
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN UPDATE
PWT-54
*includes prior year expenditures
Based upon existing and projected future land use and travel patterns, the
Transportation Plan describes roadway pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure
and services and provides an assessment of existing and projected future
transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportation priorities and guides the
development of the six-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and introduce Multimodal
Level of Service (MMLOS).
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Planning
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$35,000
$35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax &
Multi-Modal)
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$35,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 66
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 170
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
GREEN STREETS
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 67
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 171
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The City of Edmonds proposes the development of this project to demonstrate how
green infrastructure can both address stormwater flows and enhance the streetscapes
to benefit the Hwy 99 neighborhood and the downtown core.
This project includes the following elements:
• Roadway narrowing to reduce traffic speeds and to reduce impervious surface
(vehicular capacity retained)
•Sidewalks and planting strips added
•Bioretention cells collect runoff from the road through curb cuts
•Bioretention cells collect runoff directly from sidewalks
• Public private partnership potential with Housing Hope and Terrace Place
developments.
$3,710,000
GREEN STREETS
236TH ST SW - 84TH
AVE W TO HIGHWAY 99
PWT-64
*includes prior year expenditures
Incorporating green streets into the urban fabric of the City of Edmonds is intended to
demonstrate how trees, vegetation, engineered green stormwater solutions, physical
and visual narrowing of vehicular lane widths, and shortening pedestrian crossings with
curb bulbs help to slow traffic, ameliorate climate change impacts, and reinforce desired
land use and transportation patterns on appropriate street rights-of-way. This project is
intended to increase the livability of a diverse, growing city.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TRANSPORTATION
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $371,000Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,339,000Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $3,710,000$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,710,000Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $3,710,000$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 68
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 172
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
WATER
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 69
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 173
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
WATER
#CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
PWW-01 Annual Waterline Overlay (2024)$500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $0 $500
PWW-02 2027 Water Comprehensive Plan Update $0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
PWW-03 Phase 14 Annual Replacement Program (2024) $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000
PWW-04 Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program (2025) $3,576,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,576,100 $0 $3,576,100
PWW-05 Phase 16 Annual Replacement Program (2026) $547,000 $3,289,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,836,000 $0 $3,836,000
PWW-06 Phase 17 Annual Replacement Program (2027)$0 $569,000 $3,966,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,535,000 $0 $4,535,000
PWW-07 Phase 18 Annual Replacement Program (2028)$0 $0 $592,000 $4,124,000 $0 $0 $4,716,000 $0 $4,716,000
PWW-08 Phase 19 Annual Replacement Program (2029)$0 $0 $0 $616,000 $4,289,000 $0 $4,905,000 $0 $4,905,000
PWW-10 Phase 20 Annual Replacement Program (2030)$0 $0 $0 $0 $641,000 $4,460,000 $5,101,000 $0 $5,101,000
PWW-11 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades $4,760,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,610,000 $0 $8,610,000
PWW-20 Phase 21 Annual Replacement Program (2031)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $666,000 $666,000 $4,638,000 $5,304,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $8,898,600 $7,858,000 $4,908,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $36,460,600 $4,638,000 $41,098,600
Funding Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
Fund 421 - Water Utility $8,898,600 $7,858,000 $4,908,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $36,460,600 $4,638,000 $41,098,600
FUNDING TOTAL $8,898,600 $7,858,000 $4,908,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $36,460,600 $4,638,000 $41,098,600
70
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 174
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Description Road pavement overlays will cover areas of roadways that were excavated and
patched in previous years as part of the Waterline Replacement Projects.
$295,000 (2024)
ANNUAL WATERLINE
OVERLAY (2024)
PWW-01
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due
to the Annual Waterline Replacement Projects.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$500
$500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 421 - Water Utility
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$500
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 71
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 175
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The existing water comprehensive plan was last updated in 2017 and is required to be
updated by the State Dept of Health (DOH) every 10 years. This project would be a
comprehensive evaluation of the City’s drinking water system, its replacement program
and its operations and with include recommendations for improvements or adjustments
and recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance projects.
$500,000
2027 WATER
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN UPDATE
PWW-02
*includes prior year expenditures
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability,
decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease
overall day to day maintenance costs.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$150,000 $350,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 421 - Water Utility
$150,000 $350,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 72
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 176
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/maintain
pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age,
being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone to breakage due to
its material properties.
$4.2 to $9.2 million/year
PHASE 14-35 WATER
REPLACEMENT
PROJECTS (2024-45)
PWW-03-09
*includes prior year expenditures
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability,
decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease
overall day to day maintenance costs.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$547,000 $569,000 $592,000 $616,000 $641,000 $666,000 $13,873,000Design
$3,666,000 $3,813,000 $3,966,000 $4,124,000 $4,289,000 $4,460,000 $92,891,000Construction
$4,382,000 $4,558,000Expense Total $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $106,764,000$5,126,000$4,213,000
$4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $106,764,000Fund 421 - Water Utility
$4,382,000 $4,558,000Funding Source Total $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $106,764,000$5,126,000$4,213,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 73
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 177
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This work is being done to provide structural upgrades, repair leakages, and upgrades
to our two underground potable water storage reservoirs. Preliminary findings
completed in early 2023 were used to determine order of magnitude/preliminary costs
and next steps for the now planned repairs and upgrades project. The Yost Reservoir
report shows that it will need a major structural and seismic retrofit, plus repairs to
address leakage from the reservoir. The report for the Seaview Reservoir shows
similar issues as the Yost Reservoir, with a less serious leakage issue.
$9,659,000
YOST & SEAVIEW
RESERVOIR REPAIRS
& UPGRADES
PWW-11
*includes prior year expenditures
Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability,
decrease probability of leakage, retrofit structures so that they meet current structural
codes to improve their resiliency during earthquakes, and decrease overall day to day
maintenance costs.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$260,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$4,500,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$3,850,000 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$4,760,000
$4,760,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 421 - Water Utility
$3,850,000 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$4,760,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 74
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 178
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
STORMWATER
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 75
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 179
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
STORMWATER
# CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 $2,030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
PWD-11 Phase 4 Storm Maintenance Project (2024)$10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
PWD-12 Phase 5 Storm Maintenance Project (2025)$1,597,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,597,000 $0 $1,597,000
PWD-13 Phase 6 Storm Maintenance Project (2026)$249,000 $981,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,230,000 $0 $1,230,000
PWD-14 Phase 7 Storm Maintenance Project (2027)$0 $351,000 $1,825,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,176,000 $0 $2,176,000
PWD-15 Phase 8 Storm Maintenance Project (2028)$0 $0 $365,000 $1,898,000 $0 $0 $2,263,000 $0 $2,263,000
PWD-16 Phase 9 Storm Maintenance Project (2029)$0 $0 $0 $380,000 $1,974,000 $0 $2,354,000 $0 $2,354,000
PWD-18 Phase 10 Annual Storm Replacement (2030)$0 $0 $0 $0 $395,000 $2,053,000 $2,448,000 $0 $2,448,000
PWD-19 Annual SD Overlays (2024)$500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $0 $500
PWD-22 7317 Lake Ballinger Way Floodplain Purchase & Structure
Removal $256,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,000 $0 $261,000
EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION
PWD-01 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements (phase 1) $321,928 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $321,928 $0 $321,928
PWD-05 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements (phase 2) $386,708 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $386,708 $0 $386,708
PWD-24 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Planning Study $89,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $89,000 $0 $89,000
PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN
PWD-03 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects $104,000 $108,000 $112,000 $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $685,000 $2,641,000 $3,326,000
PWD-04 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Project $350,000 $1,520,000 $2,122,500 $0 $0 $0 $3,992,500 $0 $3,992,500
PWD-23 Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update $468,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $468,343 $0 $468,343
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT
PWD-07 Phase 11 Annual Storm Replacement (2031)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $411,000 $411,000 $2,135,000 $2,546,000
76
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 180
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
STORMWATER
# CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 $2,030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
COMPLIANCE RELATED
PWD-17 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan $213,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $213,000 $0 $213,000
ANNUAL TOTAL $4,045,479 $2,965,000 $4,424,500 $2,394,000 $2,489,000 $2,589,000 $18,906,979 $4,776,000 $23,682,979
Funding Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
Citizen Cash Donation $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $25,000
City of Lynnwood $30,086 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,086 $0 $30,086
Federal Grants $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,000
Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $3,081,476 $1,825,000 $2,832,625 $2,394,000 $2,489,000 $2,589,000 $15,211,101 $4,776,000 $19,987,101
Marsh Preservation Fund $29,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $29,000
Secured Grants $582,417 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $582,417 $0 $582,417
Unsecured Grants $262,500 $1,140,000 $1,591,875 $0 $0 $0 $2,994,375 $0 $2,994,375
FUNDING TOTAL $4,045,479 $2,965,000 $4,424,500 $2,394,000 $2,489,000 $2,589,000 $18,906,979 $4,776,000 $23,682,979
77
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 181
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Description Annual storm drain replacement/maintenance projects. Projects propose to replace or
rehab storm drain infrastructure in several locations throughout the City. Locations of
work identified by City crews and staff via firsthand knowledge or video inspection
results. Much of Edmonds stormwater infrastructure is past its useful lifespan and
requires routine replacement or repair to preserve the function of the storm drain
system. Failure to conduct annual maintenance projects will increase chances of storm
drain system failures.
$2.0 to $4.4 million/year
PHASE 4-25 STORM
MAINTENANCE
PROJECTS (2025-45)
PWD-11-16,18
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day
to day maintenance costs.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$337,000 $351,000 $365,000 $380,000 $395,000 $411,000 $8,539,000Design
$1,687,000 $1,755,000 $1,825,000 $1,898,000 $1,974,000 $2,053,000 $42,741,000Construction
$2,106,000 $2,190,000Expense Total $2,278,000 $2,369,000 $51,280,000$2,464,000$2,024,000
$2,024,000 $2,106,000 $2,190,000 $2,278,000 $2,369,000 $2,464,000 $51,280,000Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$2,106,000 $2,190,000Funding Source Total $2,278,000 $2,369,000 $51,280,000$2,464,000$2,024,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 78
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 182
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched
in previous years as part of the Annual Storm Maintenance Projects.
$35,000 (2024)
ANNUAL SD
OVERLAYS (2024)
PWD-19
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due
to the Annual Storm Replacement Projects.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$500
$500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$500
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 79
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 183
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The project purchases an existing single family residential property in 2023 located
within the Lake Ballinger flood plain. The City secured a $500,000 Department of
Ecology grant to aid in this process. The home is the lowest property on the lake and is
badly damaged from previous flooding to the point it is generally uninhabitable.
The City intends to remove the home and any pollution generating surfaces from the
site in 2024 as part of the initial 2023 purchase. The grant has restrictions that prevent
this parcel to be used for public use. After demolition of the structures and impervious
surfaces, the planned site use would be for public utility benefit only. Because the City
storm drain line for SR-104 cuts through in an easement immediately adjacent to this
parcel, the City plans to pursue a future project to split appropriate flows from the City
storm drain system and provide water quality treatment to the maximum extent feasible.
The future project would provide water quality treatment for a very heavily trafficked
highway (SR-104) and would make significant improvement in water quality to Lake
Ballinger and its downstream course to Lake Washington via McAleer Creek.
$940,000
7317 LAKE BALLINGER
WAY FLOODPLAIN
PURCHASE &
STRUCTURE REMOVAL
PWD-22
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve the health and water quality of Lake Ballinger by removing hard surfaces and a
home that is generally uninhabitable. Project will also provide a future location to treat
stormwater runoff from portions SR-104.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$43,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$213,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$5,000 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$256,000
$256,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$5,000 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$256,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 80
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 184
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 81
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 185
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The project will be improving water quality of stormwater runoff by replacing existing
catch basins along the west side of SR-104 funded via a DOE grant. The catch basins
will be replaced with catch basins that include water filter cartridges. Staff proposes
this effort in order to provide water quality mitigation for all discharges that directly enter
the marsh from these locations.
$418,000
EDMONDS MARSH
WATER QUALITY
IMPROVEMENTS
(PHASE 1)
PWD-01
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the west
portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better
habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$321,928 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$321,928
$80,482 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$241,446 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Secured Grants
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$321,928
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 82
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 186
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The project will be improving water quality of stormwater runoff by replacing existing
catch basins along the east side of SR-104 via a state funded appropriation. The catch
basins will be replaced with catch basins that include water filter cartridges. Staff
proposes this effort in order to provide water quality mitigation for all discharges that
directly enter the marsh from these locations.
$458,000
EDMONDS MARSH
WATER QUALITY
IMPROVEMENTS
(PHASE 2)
PWD-05
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the west
portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better
habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$39,868 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$346,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$386,708
$386,708 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0ARPA Funds
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Secured Grants
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Grants
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$386,708
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 83
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 187
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This study will include completing a gap analysis of existin data, hydrologic evaulation,
hydraulic modeling, listing restoration alternatives, minimizing the potential for exposure
to contamination, listing permits and approvals required for restoration, evaluating
project land purchase and restoration funding options, identifying a process that defines
community goals for the marsh, and producing scoping documents that list the tasks
required to complete the restoration plan.
$204,000
EDMONDS MARSH
ESTUARY PLANNING
STUDY
PWD-24
*includes prior year expenditures
Aid for future planning of Marsh Restoration.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$89,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$89,000
$35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Federal Grants
$29,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Marsh Preservation Fund
$25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Citizen Cash Donation
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$89,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 84
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 188
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 85
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 189
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Reducing scouring flows to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified in
a previous basin report completed in 2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek
which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The projects funded by
this program are incremental steps toward recovering this stream run as adequate fish
habitat. These efforts have become even more critical given recent challenges around
the Perrinville Creek outfall area. This program is a fund for implementing projects
within the Perrinville Creek basin to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allows staff
flexibility to respond to ad-hoc opportunities such as rain garden cluster projects, or
ensure matching funds are available for chasing grant applications for flow reductions
projects.
$100,000 to $229,000 per year
PERRINVILLE CREEK
FLOW MANAGEMENT
PROJECTS
PWD-03
*includes prior year expenditures
The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, improve fish passage and
decrease creek bed scour during peak flow events.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$10,400 $10,800 $11,200 $11,600 $12,000 $12,500 $300,000Design
$93,600 $97,200 $100,800 $104,400 $108,000 $112,500 $2,341,000Construction
$108,000 $112,000Expense Total $116,000 $120,000 $2,641,000$125,000$104,000
$104,000 $108,000 $112,000 $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $2,641,000Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$108,000 $112,000Funding Source Total $116,000 $120,000 $2,641,000$125,000$104,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 86
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 190
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The purpose of this project is to improve the environmental health of the creek
necessary to support fish habitat, and to restore the storm water capacity. The project
consists of the modifications to three structures that currently prevent fish passage and
are undersized for the flows on the creek, (1) the culvert at the BNSF track, remove
and replace with a fish-friendly culvert or bridge with adequate flow capacity, which will
be led and funded by BNSF and the Tulalip Tribes using grant funds, (2) return flow to
the creek between the high flow bypass structure and the BNSF culvert by blocking the
structure and restoring creek capacity and (3) culvert at Talbot Road, will be removed
and replaced with a fish-friendly culvert or bridge that provides adequate fish passage
and storm water flow capacity. This project will increase the resiliency of the watershed
by building the structures that mimic the natural channel performance necessary for
fish habitat and stormwater flow capacity. The project also includes time and effort to
research and apply for supplemental/additional funding sources for construction of the
Edmonds portions of the work (Items 2 & 3). Due to the project complexity and number
of stakeholders, the planning and design phase is estimated to be 2-years.
$4,500,000
LOWER PERRINVILLE
CREEK RESTORATION
PROJECT
PWD-04
*includes prior year expenditures
The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and improve fish passage.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$350,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $1,070,000 $2,122,500 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$1,520,000 $2,122,500Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$350,000
$87,500 $380,000 $530,625 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$262,500 $1,140,000 $1,591,875 $0 $0 $0 $0Unsecured Grants
$1,520,000 $2,122,500Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$350,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 87
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 191
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description City of Edmonds and Lynnwood joint project to supplement/update the Perrinville Creek
2015 basin analysis that determined possible locations for projects that would help
decrease the peak storm flows during high rain events. Project will be updated to reflect
projects completed and also determine if there are other locations within the basin to
aid in the reduction of peak flows in the basin.
$649,200
PERRINVILLE CREEK
BASIN ANALYSIS
UPDATE
PWD-23
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve overall basin and stream health, by using green stormwater infrastructure
methods. This will make it so that rainfall is not simply collected and conveyed
downstream and instead behaves as close as possible to natural conditions. This
includes infiltrating rainfall runoff as close as possible to where it fell. This will also
decrease stream peak flows, which will decrease stream erosion and improve the
overall stream habitat for aquatic life.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$468,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$468,343
$97,286 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$340,971 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Secured Grants
$30,086 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Lynnwood
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$468,343
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 88
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 192
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
COMPLIANCE RELATED
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 89
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 193
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The City of Edmonds (City) owns and operates an extensive system of drainage pipes,
ditches, and other assets to convey stormwater runoff into streams, lakes, and Puget
Sound to prevent and minimize damage to private property, streets, and other
infrastructure. The City is faced with the challenge of conveying this runoff safely and
cost-effectively while preventing or minimizing the adverse impacts of high flows
(erosion, flooding, and sediment deposition) and of stormwater pollutants on water
quality and aquatic habitat. In addition, recent state and federal stormwater regulations
make it technically and financially challenging to address these issues while balancing
utility ratepayer costs. To proactively address these challenges and remain in
compliance with the State-mandated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Phase II permit)
and other increasing regulatory requirements, the City is updating its current
comprehensive storm and surface water management plan. This permit has and will
continue to have a significant impact on the workload and operational budget of both
the Engineering Division and the Storm Crews within the Public Works Department. Per
the State Department of Ecology, the plan will also include the work findings from their
required (Stormwater Management Action Plan) SMAP process of City drainage
watersheds. Project will also include recommendations for stormwater utilities rates to
be adjusted at the discretion of Council.
$733,000
STORM AND SURFACE
WATER
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PWD-17
*includes prior year expenditures
A holistic summary of the City’s Stormwater system with recommended priorities for
selecting future capital maintenance and improvements projects.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - STORMWATER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$213,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$213,000
$213,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$213,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 90
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 194
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
SEWER
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 91
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 195
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
SEWER
#CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
PWS-01 Annual Sanitary Sewer Replacement Overlays (2024)$500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $0 $500
PWS-02 2027 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update $0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
PWS-03 Phase 11 Sewer Replacement (2024)$10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000
PWS-04 Phase 12 Sewer Replacement (2025)$2,302,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,302,000 $0 $2,302,000
PWS-05 Phase 13 Sewer Replacement (2026)$378,000 $2,126,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,504,000 $0 $2,504,000
PWS-06 Phase 14 Sewer Replacement (2027)$0 $393,000 $2,210,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,603,000 $0 $2,603,000
PWS-07 Phase 15 Sewer Replacement (2028)$0 $0 $409,000 $2,299,000 $0 $0 $2,708,000 $0 $2,708,000
PWS-08 Phase 16 Sewer Replacement (2029)$0 $0 $0 $425,000 $2,391,000 $0 $2,816,000 $0 $2,816,000
PWS-10 Annual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation $0 $0 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $662,000 $2,496,000 $13,735,000 $16,231,000
PWS-12 Phase 17 Sewer Replacement (2030)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $460,000 $460,000 $2,586,000 $3,046,000
PWS-13 Phase 18 Sewer Replacement (2031)$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
EXPENSE TOTAL $2,690,500 $2,669,000 $3,556,000 $3,335,000 $3,027,000 $1,122,000 $16,399,500 $16,321,000 $32,720,500
Funding Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $2,690,500 $2,669,000 $3,556,000 $3,335,000 $3,027,000 $1,122,000 $16,389,500 $16,321,000 $32,710,500
FUNDING TOTAL $2,690,500 $2,669,000 $3,556,000 $3,335,000 $3,027,000 $1,122,000 $16,389,500 $16,321,000 $32,710,500
92
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 196
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched
in previous years as part of the Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects.
$30,000
ANNUAL SANITARY
SEWER REPLACEMENT
OVERLAYS (2024)
PWS-01
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due
to Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$500
$500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$500
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 93
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 197
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The existing sewer comprehensive plan was last updated in 2013 and is in need of an
update. This project would be a comprehensive evaluation of the City’s sewer system,
its replacement program and operations, with recommendations for improvements or
adjustments and recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance
projects.
$500,000
2027 SANITARY
SEWER
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN UPDATE
PWS-02
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease
breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$150,000 $350,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$150,000 $350,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 94
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 198
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/rehab
pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old age,
being undersized, need to increase capacity, or more prone to breakage due to its
material properties.
$2.7 to $5.3 million/year
PHASE 11-30 SEWER
REPLACEMENT (2025-
45)
PWS-03-09
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease
breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$378,000 $393,000 $409,000 $425,000 $442,000 $460,000 $9,568,000Design
$2,312,000 $2,126,000 $2,210,000 $2,299,000 $2,391,000 $2,487,000 $51,780,000Construction
$2,519,000 $2,619,000Expense Total $2,724,000 $2,833,000 $61,348,000$2,947,000$2,690,000
$2,690,000 $2,519,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000 $2,947,000 $61,348,000Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$2,519,000 $2,619,000Funding Source Total $2,724,000 $2,833,000 $61,348,000$2,947,000$2,690,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 95
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 199
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of
sewer mains, the project will line existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion,
infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this trenchless method.
2025 and 2026 funds will be combined with the Annual Sewer Replacement Program.
This is because the annual replacement rehab program for these years will be focusing
on pipe lining as well thereby requiring only 1 design and 1 construction contract to
administer.
$587,000 to $662,000/year
ANNUAL CITYWIDE
CIPP SEWER
REHABILITATION
PWS-10
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease
breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - SEWER
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $88,000 $92,000 $96,000 $100,000 $2,070,000Design
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Right of Way
$0 $0 $499,000 $519,000 $540,000 $562,000 $11,665,000Construction
$0 $587,000Expense Total $611,000 $636,000 $13,735,000$662,000$0
$0 $0 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $662,000 $13,735,000Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$0 $587,000Funding Source Total $611,000 $636,000 $13,735,000$662,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 96
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 200
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
FACILITIES
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 97
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 201
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
FACILITIES
#CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
PWF-01 Boys and Girls Club $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $0 $132,364 $0 $132,364
PWF-02 Cemetery Building $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 $5,000 $2,500 $21,109 $0 $21,109
PWF-03 City Hall $25,000 $25,000 $258,628 $150,949 $65,000 $50,000 $574,577 $0 $574,577
PWF-04 Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 $3,000 $5,000 $19,089 $0 $19,089
PWF-05 Frances Anderson Center $20,000 $30,000 $98,892 $385,274 $113,029 $80,000 $727,195 $0 $727,195
PWF-06 Fire Station 16 $35,000 $40,000 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $241,126 $0 $241,126
PWF-07 Fire Station 17 $30,000 $25,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 $471,742 $0 $471,742
PWF-08 Fire Station 20 $5,000 $5,500 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $218,295 $0 $218,295
PWF-09 Historic Log Cabin $1,000 $30,000 $6,469 $1,500 $2,000 $1,500 $42,469 $0 $42,469
PWF-10 Historical Museum $3,000 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $77,820 $0 $77,820
PWF-11 Library $160,000 $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $25,000 $418,363 $0 $418,363
PWF-12 Meadowdale Club House $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $28,590 $0 $28,590
PWF-13 Old Public Works $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $149,519 $0 $149,519
PWF-14 Parks Maintenance Building $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $123,754 $0 $123,754
PWF-15 Public Safety $50,000 $10,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 $861,721 $0 $861,721
PWF-16 Public Works O&M $524,000 $1,017,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $1,794,484 $0 $1,794,484
PWF-17 Wade James Theater $3,000 $45,000 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $254,486 $0 $254,486
PWF-18 Yost Pool House $5,000 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $25,000 $117,925 $0 $117,925
PWF-23 Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $4,900,000 $0 $4,900,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $942,399 $1,461,990 $1,140,688 $1,159,399 $1,081,152 $5,389,000 $11,174,628 $0 $11,174,628
98
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 202
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
FACILITIES
Funding Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond)$450,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $800,000
Fund 016 (non-bond)$93,399 $134,813 $151,159 $70,949 $0 $0 $450,320 $0 $450,320
Fund 421 - Water Utility $133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $457,000 $0 $457,000
Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $457,000 $0 $457,000
Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $457,000 $0 $457,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $5,177 $989,529 $1,088,450 $1,081,152 $5,389,000 $8,553,308 $0 $8,553,308
FUNDING TOTAL $942,399 $1,461,990 $1,140,688 $1,159,399 $1,081,152 $5,389,000 $11,174,628 $0 $11,174,628
99
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 203
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Description This building built in 1900 was the original field house for Edmonds High School. The
property is located at Civic Field and not part of the large Civic Field Park restoration
project. The building is solely operated by the Snohomish County Boys and Girls Club
in partnership with the City’s Parks and Recreation department. The building has
sustained some interior settling that will require immediate repair to back hallway floors
and the back stairway. It has significant need for major renovations if it is expected to
be in operation for another 10 years. Renovation and deferred maintenance may
eclipse the building value in its current location. Floor stabilization work was
completed, and building is now on a run to fail model waiting replacement of building
through a private public partnership. Building will be maintained in operational
readiness to support the Boys and Girls Club, until their new building is constructed.
Projects: Exterior plumbing access, Window replacement, Roof replacement, Siding
replacement, ADA Access, Plumbing replacement, Front entry door replacement, Fire
Alarm System new installation, Fire Sprinkler updates, Baseboard heating replacement
If the Boys and Girls Club builds a new facility in the future, then maintenance funding
programmed for the building will be adjusted to align with the project schedule.
$27,733 (2025)
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
PWF-01
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $0 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$37,453 $32,077Expense Total $15,101 $20,000 $0$0$27,733
$27,733 $37,453 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $0 $0Unsecured Funding
$37,453 $32,077Funding Source Total $15,101 $20,000 $0$0$27,733
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 100
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 204
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This small structure houses the Edmonds Cemetery funerary services and the
cemetery Sextant office. The building is in relatively good condition and has little
deferred maintenance backlog. Minor security and communications updates will be
needed as technology dictates.
Projects:
Minor repair and maintenance
$8,414 (2025)
CEMETERY BUILDING
PWF-02
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 $5,000 $2,500 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$3,377 $818Expense Total $1,000 $5,000 $0$2,500$8,414
$8,414 $3,377 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $818 $1,000 $5,000 $2,500 $0Unsecured Funding
$3,377 $818Funding Source Total $1,000 $5,000 $0$2,500$8,414
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 101
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 205
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description City Hall was built in 1979 and was operated as a private business office center until
the City purchased and renovated the building in the 1990s. The City has operated
Edmonds City Hall from this location since the renovations were completed. The
building is in near original condition and needs substantial repair and maintenance.
Projects: All Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing systems need replacement,
Restroom remodels w/gender neutral consideration, Center Stairway Code updates
and replacement, Lobby remodel, Entry Awning re-glazing, Interior Painting, ADA
accessibility improvements.
$25,000 (2025)
CITY HALL
PWF-03
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$25,000 $25,000 $258,628 $150,949 $65,000 $50,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$25,000 $258,628Expense Total $150,949 $65,000 $0$50,000$25,000
$25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$0 $0 $150,000 $70,949 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $108,628 $80,000 $65,000 $50,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$25,000 $258,628Funding Source Total $150,949 $65,000 $0$50,000$25,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 102
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 206
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The Pier was recently renovated and is generally in good condition. The Beach Ranger
Office is a 1200 square foot office and restroom facility located near the east end of the
pier. There are season programs and visitor support functions that operate out of this
facility.
Projects: Electrical panel clean up and safety inspection, minor repairs, and
maintenance, Beach Ranger Station/restroom roof replacement.
$2,971 (2025)
FISHING PIER/BEACH
RANGER STATION
PWF-04
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 $3,000 $5,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$5,628 $1,043Expense Total $1,500 $3,000 $0$5,000$2,918
$2,918 $5,628 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $1,043 $1,500 $3,000 $5,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$5,628 $1,043Funding Source Total $1,500 $3,000 $0$5,000$2,918
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 103
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 207
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The Frances Anderson Center serves as the City’s main recreation center offering arts,
athletic and cultural programing year round. Due to the age and high usage of the
building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or restoration.
Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilers with Electric alternatives that will add
ventilation, cooling and heating Investment grade audit approved by City Council,
Replacement of all exterior doors scheduled for 2024/25, ADA accessible door
closures, Plumbing drainage collector, Restroom remodels (w/ gender neutral
consideration), Replacement of all plumbing fixtures, Addition of building security card
readers, Building HVAC controls to maximize efficiency, Fire Sprinkler replacement,
and clean building act compliance efforts will be addresses by IGA.)
$20,000 (2025)
FRANCES ANDERSON
CENTER
PWF-05
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$20,000 $30,000 $98,892 $385,274 $113,029 $80,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$30,000 $98,892Expense Total $385,274 $113,029 $0$80,000$20,000
$20,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$0 $0 $98,892 $385,274 $113,029 $80,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$30,000 $98,892Funding Source Total $385,274 $113,029 $0$80,000$20,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 104
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 208
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This facility is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue and was built in
2003 and has a building area of 10,700 square feet. The building is in fair condition and
will require some infrastructure updates or replacements to remain operationally ready
for the needs of the City.
Projects: Roll-up Bay door controller replacements, HVAC unit assessment, Gutter
replacement, interior coatings updates.
$35000 (2025)
FIRE STATION 16
PWF-06
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$35,000 $40,000 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$40,000 $69,388Expense Total $30,107 $31,631 $0$35,000$35,000
$35,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$0 $0 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$40,000 $69,388Funding Source Total $30,107 $31,631 $0$35,000$35,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 105
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 209
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This building is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue, was built in
1999 and has a building area of 9,800 square feet. This building has had some updates
but will need some infrastructure upgrades to remain operationally ready.
Projects: Bay Door assessment, Electrical infrastructure updates, roof soffit enclosure,
interior painting.
$30,000 (2025)
FIRE STATION 17
PWF-07
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$30,000 $25,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$25,000 $221,922Expense Total $27,575 $122,245 $0$45,000$30,000
$30,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$0 $0 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$25,000 $221,922Funding Source Total $27,575 $122,245 $0$45,000$30,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 106
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 210
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This building is the eldest of the City's three fire stations and is operated by South
County Fire and Rescue. This station serves Esperance and supports the other two fire
stations in Edmonds. The building is 6400 square feet and was built in 1990. The
building has had significant updates to the exterior envelope and is in need of interior
and HVAC system updates.
Projects: interior painting, restroom fixture replacement
$5000 (2025)
FIRE STATION 20
PWF-08
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$5,000 $5,500 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$5,500 $94,248Expense Total $69,782 $23,765 $0$20,000$5,000
$5,000 $5,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$5,500 $94,248Funding Source Total $69,782 $23,765 $0$20,000$5,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 107
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 211
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This Historic log cabin is home to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce visitor center,
the structure was a purpose built cabin from the turn of the century. The structure is
professionally maintained on a three year cycle by a log cabin specialist and requires
only minor maintenance and upkeep annually.
Projects: new thick cut shingle replacement, chinking of exterior log finish, interior
lighting.
$1000 (2025)
HISTORIC LOG CABIN
PWF-09
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$1,000 $30,000 $6,469 $1,500 $2,000 $1,500 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$30,000 $6,469Expense Total $1,500 $2,000 $0$1,500$1,000
$0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $6,469 $1,500 $2,000 $1,500 $0Unsecured Funding
$30,000 $6,469Funding Source Total $1,500 $2,000 $0$1,500$1,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 108
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 212
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The 110-year-old original Carnegie Library building is home to the Edmonds Museum.
The building is on the State of Washington Historic registry and has been well
maintained over the last several years. Buildings of this age require specialized
maintenance and coordination with the state historic architect to maintain the historic
status. Structural stabilization, weatherproofing, and updating the restroom to meet
ADA compliance are the most significant priorities to maintain this facility.
Projects: minor structural reinforcement, entry façade masonry repair, lower entry
restoration
$3000 (2025)
HISTORICAL MUSEUM
PWF-10
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$3,000 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$45,000 $10,000Expense Total $4,621 $10,199 $0$5,000$3,000
$0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$45,000 $10,000Funding Source Total $4,621 $10,199 $0$5,000$3,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 109
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 213
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The Edmonds Library is operated by the Sno-Isle Library system with exception of the
Second floor Plaza room rental space. The library is a 19,000 square foot building built
in 1982. The building hosts special event rentals and daily Library programming and
community services. This is one of the City’s most heavily used buildings by the public
and has significant deferred maintenance needs, including the building façade, roof and
plaza deck waterproofing.
Projects: window replacement, ADA access device upgrades or replacement, gender
inclusive public restroom creation, Plaza Room restroom/changing facilities, Plaza
Room A/V installation, building masonry restoration or building cladding, exterior
stairway restoration, HVAC ventilation fan assessment, building breezeway remodel,
flood damage restoration, and plaza level green roof now on CIP.
$160,000 (2025)
LIBRARY
PWF-11
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$160,000 $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $25,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$100,000 $53,325Expense Total $45,038 $35,000 $0$25,000$160,000
$160,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$0 $0 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $25,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$100,000 $53,325Funding Source Total $45,038 $35,000 $0$25,000$160,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 110
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 214
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This 4000 square foot facility was built in 1965 as a community theater facility and later
was transformed into the Meadowdale community club house. The building is currently
owned and maintained by the City of Edmonds and houses the City operated
Meadowdale pre-school and the 1500 square foot Meadowdale club house rental
facility. This facility while dated has been well maintained and only requires minor
maintenance and repairs.
Projects: minor maintenance and repairs, interior flooring and painting, and bath fixture
replacement.
$7,985 (2025)
MEADOWDALE CLUB
HOUSE
PWF-12
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$4,446 $1,159Expense Total $5,000 $5,000 $0$5,000$7,985
$7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$4,446 $1,159Funding Source Total $5,000 $5,000 $0$5,000$7,985
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 111
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 215
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This facility was built in 1965 to house the City’s Public Works Department, the building
was converted in 1995 to tenant space and City storage, as well as Edmonds Police
large evidence storage. This is a vital piece of property adjacent to the Waste Water
Treatment Plant, and could be converted for utility use if regulatory requirements
dictate. Building is primarily used as storage and will need some updates to maintain
current operational readiness.
Projects: HVAC updates, roll-up door replacement, security camera system.
$25000 (2025)
OLD PUBLIC WORKS
PWF-13
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$25,000 $25,000Expense Total $25,000 $24,519 $0$25,000$25,000
$25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$25,000 $25,000Funding Source Total $25,000 $24,519 $0$25,000$25,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 112
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 216
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This facility was built in 1967 by Ed Huntley who at the time was the City Facilities
supervisor. The 4800 square foot facility now houses all City Facility Operations
staff(11) and all of Park and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+ seasonal help) This
Facility is home to the City Carpentry Shop, Key Shop, City Flower program, Parks
engine repair shop and Parks and Facilities maintenance supply storage as well as
Parks and Facilities Manager offices. This Facility is near end of life and is undersized
to support the departmental staffing that are assigned to this facility.
Projects: maintenance and repair to maintain operational capacity, ADA restroom
updates, shop floor replacement, Pine St. facility exit, exterior painting.
$9,349 (2025)
PARKS MAINTENANCE
BUILDING
PWF-14
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$5,177 $69,228Expense Total $20,000 $10,000 $0$10,000$9,349
$9,349 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$5,177 $69,228Funding Source Total $20,000 $10,000 $0$10,000$9,349
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 113
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 217
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The Public Safety building houses Edmonds Police Department, Edmonds Municipal
Court and the City Council Chambers. The building was built in 1999 encompassing
30,000 square feet of office, court and municipal government uses. The building
houses one of the City emergency operations centers, large police training, simulator
facilities and evidence processing and storage. The building has had minimal system
updates over it’s life and has a significant amount of deferred maintenance and should
be retrofitted with new fire sprinklers.
Projects: air handler and outdoor ventilation unit replacements, new solar plant
installation, parking lot reconfiguration to meet current usage, fire sprinkler installation,
interior hallway renovation and painting, sleeping room remodel and gender
specific/neutral accommodations, gender inclusive public restrooms, operable windows
is specific locations, courts flat roof replacement.
$50000 (2025)
PUBLIC SAFETY
PWF-15
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$50,000 $10,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$10,000 $55,169Expense Total $151,481 $515,071 $0$80,000$50,000
$50,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$0 $0 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$10,000 $55,169Funding Source Total $151,481 $515,071 $0$80,000$50,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 114
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 218
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This building built in 1995 houses four Public Works divisions and the auxiliary City
Emergency Operations Center. This building is 28,000 square feet and is capable of
operations 24/7 during weather emergencies and natural disasters. The building has
significant deferred maintenance needs and infrastructure updates.
Projects: vehicle yard leveling, HVAC unit replacements, roof system for material
bunkers, ventilation fan replacements, fire alarm system replacement, lobby remodel,
restroom remodel with gender inclusivity considerations, electric vehicle charging and
maintenance infrastructure, emergency communications updates, interior hallway
flooring thresholds, utility bay HVAC replacement, water main replacement (building
connection).
$125000 (2025)
PUBLIC WORKS O&M
PWF-16
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$524,000 $1,017,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$1,017,000 $80,315Expense Total $79,348 $43,821 $0$50,000$524,000
$125,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$0 $0 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 421 - Water Utility
$133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility
$133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$1,017,000 $80,315Funding Source Total $79,348 $43,821 $0$50,000$524,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 115
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 219
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This community theater was built by the Driftwood Players theater group in 1967 and
was deeded to City ownership at a later date. The facility is 6,300 square feet in size
and houses the Driftwood Players theatrical performances and City meetings. The
City’s maintenance responsibilities are limited to large infrastructure, parking lot,
roofing, and grounds.
Projects: parking lot repair and recoating, minor repair, and maintenance.
$3000 (2025)
WADE JAMES THEATER
PWF-17
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$3,000 $45,000 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$45,000 $43,880Expense Total $115,734 $21,872 $0$25,000$3,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$3,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$45,000 $43,880Funding Source Total $115,734 $21,872 $0$25,000$3,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 116
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 220
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description This recreational facility houses the City’s aquatic programing and some Parks and
Recreation programs. Built in 1971 the pool house historically was only operated
seasonally. The tenant run aquatic programing is currently expanding to year round lap
and team aquatic activities and will continue to support summer open swim
programing. The facility requires minimal maintenance to remain operational and is
subject to tenant lease terms of use.
Projects: security updates, roof replacement, gutter replacement, plumbing fixture
updates, exterior door replacements, operational repair and maintenance to
accommodate 365 operations.
$5000 (2025)
YOST POOL HOUSE
PWF-18
*includes prior year expenditures
Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property
operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an
expected lifespan.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$5,000 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $25,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$8,409 $19,127Expense Total $30,389 $30,000 $0$25,000$5,000
$5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (2021 Facilities
Bond)
$0 $8,409 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 016 (non-bond)
$0 $0 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $25,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$8,409 $19,127Funding Source Total $30,389 $30,000 $0$25,000$5,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 117
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 221
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The Library Plaza Deck is essentially a green roof on the second floor of the Edmonds
Sno-Isle Library. The deck surface was waterproofed and remodeled in 2003, since
that project continuous water intrusion has occurred through the waterproof membrane.
This water intrusion has been successfully mitigated over the years and has not been
deemed a project of significance previously. In 2018 Western Specialty Contractors
inspected the water intrusion and offered an initial ROM price to demolish and
waterproof the existing plaza deck. Rebuilding the plaza deck and replacement of
landscape, planters, grass, pavement, flashing and hand railings would be a separate
construction project. The Parks Director in 2018 offered an estimate to replace
landscaping and irrigations systems. In 2021 a draft structural report was performed by
MLA Engineering to discover any structural consequences from the years of water
intrusion, building was deemed structurally sound and water intrusion not factoring in to
building structural stability.
$4,900,000 (2030)
LIBRARY PLAZA DECK
WATERPROOFING
PROJECT
PWF-23
*includes prior year expenditures
Maintaining building in operational and safe condition, in order to maintain partnership
with Sno-Isle Library system. Preservation of the City’s physical assets in appropriate
condition vs. the age of the facility and historic capital investment.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $0Construction\Professional
Services
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$4,900,000$0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $0Unsecured Funding
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$4,900,000$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 118
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 222
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 119
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 223
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
WASTEWATER TREATEMENT PLANT
#CFP Project DP 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
PWP-01 WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In-House
Projects $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $0 $4,500,000 $0 $4,500,000
PWP-04 Nutrient Removal Project $750,000 $750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $41,500,000 $0 $41,500,000
PWP-10 VFD Upgrades $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
PWP-12 Primary Clarifier 3 Rehab $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $0 $950,000
PWP-13 ODS (Primary Sludge) Pump Replacement $0 $350,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $0 $600,000
PWP-14 Chlorine Contact Channel Sluice Gates
Replacement $0 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $375,000
PWP-15 Screw Press Feed System Rehab $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $150,000
PWP-16 NPW Pumping System Improvements $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $75,000
PWP-17 600 Bldg Air Quality Evaluation $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $50,000
PWP-18 LPA Blower 303 Rehab $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,000
PWP-19 600 Bldg Electrical Rehab $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $250,000
PWP-20 600 Bldg Air Quality Rehab/Upgrade $0 $250,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $0 $450,000
PWP-21 Secondary Clarifier 2 Rehab $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000
EXPENSE TOTAL $2,760,000 $2,850,000 $21,450,000 $21,625,000 $1,250,000 $0 $49,935,000 $0 $49,935,000
Funding Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
2025-31
Total 2031-45 Grand Total
City of Shoreline $261,924 $270,465 $2,035,605 $2,052,212 $118,625 $0 $4,738,831 $0 $4,738,831
Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $1,401,805 $1,447,515 $10,894,455 $10,983,338 $634,875 $0 $25,361,988 $0 $25,361,988
Mountlake Terrace $639,492 $660,345 $4,969,965 $5,010,513 $289,625 $0 $11,569,940 $0 $11,569,940
Olympic View Water Sewer District $456,779 $471,675 $3,549,975 $3,578,937 $206,875 $0 $8,264,241 $0 $8,264,241
FUNDING TOTAL $2,760,000 $2,850,000 $21,450,000 $21,625,000 $1,250,000 $0 $49,935,000 $0 $49,935,000
120
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 224
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
Description The WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In-House Projects is intended to maintain
infrastructure and equipment to ensure that the treatment plant is well maintained.
$500,000 (2024)
WWTP ANNUAL
CAPITAL
REPLACEMENT IN-
HOUSE PROJECTS
PWP-01
*includes prior year expenditures
This project ensures that critical infrastructure is maintained and equipment is replaced
in order to reduce risk to the City.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0Design
$400,000 $400,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0Construction
$500,000 $1,000,000Expense Total $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $0$0$500,000
$253,950 $253,950 $507,900 $634,875 $634,875 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$115,850 $115,850 $231,700 $289,625 $289,625 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$82,750 $82,750 $165,500 $206,875 $206,875 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$47,450 $47,450 $94,900 $118,625 $118,625 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$500,000 $1,000,000Funding Source Total $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $0$0$500,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 121
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 225
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The WA Dept of Ecology has imposed the Puget Sound Nutrient General Permit upon
us. It is anticipated that our current process will not be able to meet these new permit
requirements. This decision package will allow us to team with an engineering firm to
study our current process and design a solution that will allow our plant to meet the
new PSNGP requirements as well as accommodate projected service area growth over
the next decade.
$41,850,000
NUTRIENT REMOVAL
PROJECT
PWP-04
*includes prior year expenditures
To meet new permit requirements and increase capacity for projected 20-year service
area expansion.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$750,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $0Construction
$750,000 $20,000,000Expense Total $20,000,000 $0 $0$0$750,000
$380,925 $380,925 $10,158,000 $10,158,000 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$173,775 $173,775 $4,634,000 $4,634,000 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$124,125 $124,125 $3,310,000 $3,310,000 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$71,175 $71,175 $1,898,000 $1,898,000 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$750,000 $20,000,000Funding Source Total $20,000,000 $0 $0$0$750,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 122
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 226
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The WWTP has several VFD's (variable frequency drives) on various critical equipment
influent pumps, effluent pumps, RAS/WAS pumps, aeration blowers, etc. These VFD's
have an expected useful life of 15-20 years. Several of the VFD's here at the plant
range in age between 20-30 years old. There have already bees some failures and
replacements made. These outdated VFD's need to be replaced to avoid a
catastrophic failure event that could happen to these weakened state VFD's for any
number of reasons, including abrupt starting and stopping due to power bumps/loss,
switching from grid to generator power supply or just a parts failure. If multiple critical
components fail simultaneously, then the plant may lose it's ability to treat wastewater
that meets NPDES permit requirements resulting in pollution of our receiving waters
and possible fines by our governing agency.
$250,000
VFD UPGRADES
PWP-10
*includes prior year expenditures
To keep critical equipment reliable and in working condition.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$250,000 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$250,000
$126,975 $126,975 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$57,925 $57,925 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$41,375 $41,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$23,725 $23,725 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$250,000 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$250,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 123
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 227
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Primary Clarifier #3 (dual drive) cages, center columns, feedwells, corner sweeps,
weirs, counterweights, skimming devices and rake arms need replacement due to
severe corrosion. The steel is in a highly corrosive environment and has not been
replaced since the original construction approximately 30 years ago. The limited access
will require that pieces be assembled inside the tank. The concrete structure also
needs to be inspected and repaired as needed as corrosion of the concrete in spots
has led to exposed rebar and may have compromised the structural integrity of the
clarifier.
$950,000
PRIMARY CLARIFIER 3
REHAB
PWP-12
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is approaching a state of imminent
failure. Ensure WWTP’s ability to treat wastewater up to its rated capacity and meet
discharge permit requirements.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$950,000
$482,505 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$220,115 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$157,225 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$90,155 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$950,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 124
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 228
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description The ODS pumps are over 30 years old and are at the end of their useful life. The
maintenance, reliability and efficiency of the primary sludge pumping system would be
greatly improved by replacing the current diaphragm pumps with progressive cavity
pumps. During this pump replacement, piping modifications would also be done to
allow pumps to support more than one clarifier, improving system redundancy along
with reliability.
$600,000
ODS (PRIMARY
SLUDGE) PUMP
REPLACEMENT
PWP-13
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve reliability, redundancy and efficiency of the primary sludge and scum pumps by
replacing 30+ year old pumps and improving piping system.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$350,000 $250,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $177,765 $126,975 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$0 $81,095 $57,925 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$0 $57,925 $41,375 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$0 $33,215 $23,725 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$350,000 $250,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 125
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 229
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Replace two gate valves and actuators at the inlets of the two chlorine contact
channels. These gates have repeatedly failed. Repair is often expensive and time
consuming, as access is an issue, so it is necessary to rent scaffolding and other
equipment to make repairs. When a gate fails, it effectively cuts the disinfection
capacity of the plant in half. These are critical pieces of equipment and need to be
replaced with a different technology to improve performance and reliability.
$375,000
CHLORINE CONTACT
CHANNEL SLUICE
GATES REPLACEMENT
PWP-14
*includes prior year expenditures
To replace problematic, yet critical valves with more reliable technology that helps to
ensure disinfection system functionality and the ability to continue to meet NPDES
discharge permit requirements.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $375,000 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $0 $0 $190,463 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$0 $0 $0 $86,888 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$0 $0 $0 $62,062 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$0 $0 $0 $35,587 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$0 $0Funding Source Total $375,000 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 126
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 230
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Replace two sludge feed pumps and three polymer pumps that are reaching the end of
their useful life and are often down for repairs.
$150,000
SCREW PRESS FEED
SYSTEM REHAB
PWP-15
*includes prior year expenditures
Replacing these pumps allows for consistent and reliable operation of the sludge
dewatering system which supplies dewatered biosolids to the new gasification system.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$150,000
$76,185 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$34,755 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$24,825 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$14,235 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$150,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 127
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 231
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Relocate one NPW pump, replace one NPW pump and modify piping as needed to
achieve system functionality.
$75,000
NPW PUMPING
SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS
PWP-16
*includes prior year expenditures
Current NPW system in non-functional as currently built. Only current one pump
provides the needed system pressure to allow the standby generator to function. In the
event of that pump failing, the standby generator (which is required as a backup power
source per our NPDES permit) is not operable. This project will allow for much needed
NPW redundancy.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$75,000
$38,093 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$17,378 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$12,412 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$7,118 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$75,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 128
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 232
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Evaluate the AQ issues within the 600 bldg with a focus on the lower level where H2S
gas appears to be accumulating at levels that are high enough to do damage to
sensitive electronic equipment such as VFD's, control boards and relay switches.
These electronic failures cause shutdowns in the primary sludge pumping system, high
pressure plant aie system and sludge dewatering system.
$50,000
600 BLDG AIR
QUALITY EVALUATION
PWP-17
*includes prior year expenditures
After rehab/upgrade project is complete (2026-part 2 of this project), it will improve
performance and reliability as well as lowering operational and maintenance costs for
the systems mentioned above.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$50,000
$25,395 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$11,585 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$8,275 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$4,745 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$50,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 129
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 233
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Blower is currently running at 75% capacity as it is at the end of it's useful life (30,000
hrs, put in service in 2017) and is due for a rebuild.
$35,000
LPA BLOWER 303
REHAB
PWP-18
*includes prior year expenditures
As this is our medium sized blower, it allows for more efficient and cost-saving
operation of the LPA system.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$0 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$35,000
$17,777 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$8,110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$5,792 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$3,322 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$0 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$35,000
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 130
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 234
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Both the high and low voltage electrical systems are in a degraded state and have
funtionality issues during periods of high demand, often resulting in equipment failure
due to MCC or breaker failures. This is a critical system and is at the end of it's useful
life, being well over thirty years old.
$250,000
600 BLDG ELECTRICAL
REHAB
PWP-19
*includes prior year expenditures
Rehab of the 600 bldg electrical system will result in a tremendous increase in the
reliability of the critical systems within the 600 bldg including sludge dewatering, primary
sludge pumping, high-pressure air, chemical disinfection pumps and several others.
Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$250,000 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $126,975 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$0 $57,925 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$0 $41,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$0 $23,725 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$250,000 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 131
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 235
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Perform AQ system repairs and modifications from the prior years' AQ Evaluation
Project to resolve the AQ issues within the 600 bldg with a focus on the lower level
where H2S gas appears to be accumulating at levels that are high enough to do
damage to sensitive electronic equipment such as VFD's, control boards and relay
switches. These electronic failures cause shutdowns in the primary sludge pumping
system, high pressure plant aie system and sludge dewatering system.
$250,000
600 BLDG AIR
QUALITY
REHAB/UPGRADE
PWP-20
*includes prior year expenditures
Improve performance and reliability as well as lowering operational and maintenance
costs for the systems mentioned above.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$250,000 $200,000Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $126,975 $101,580 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$0 $57,925 $46,340 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$0 $41,375 $33,100 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$0 $23,725 $18,980 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$250,000 $200,000Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 132
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 236
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Description Secondary Clarifier 2 has reached the end of useful life as it's components are over 30
years old and need to be replaced. Clarifier drive, drive motor and steel structure have
corroded and need repair or replacement. Concrete needs to be evaluated and
repaired if necessary.
$450,000
SECONDARY
CLARIFIER 2 REHAB
PWP-21
*includes prior year expenditures
This will increase reliability/redundancy in the secondary system and help ensure the
final effluent meets NPDES discharge permit standards.Benefit
Estimated Project Cost
PUBLIC WORKS - TREATMENT PLANT
Budget
DRAFT v2.0
Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45
$0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Design
$0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Construction
$500,000 $0Expense Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
$0 $253,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Fund 423 - Sewer Utility
$0 $115,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Mountlake Terrace
$0 $82,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Olympic View Water Sewer
District
$0 $47,450 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0City of Shoreline
$500,000 $0Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0$0$0
2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 133
7.B.a
Packet Pg. 237
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
I
P
a
n
d
C
F
P
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
2025-2030 PROPOSED
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN &
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2024
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 238
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 1
Table of Contents
Director’s Letter ................................................................ 2
CIP/CFP Worksheets ....................................................... 3-6
Project Distribution Map ................................................. 7
Project Descriptions ...................................................... 8-26
Program Descriptions ................................................... 27-29
Acquisition Descriptions ............................................... 30-31
Fund Detail ..................................................................... 32
Fund 332 (Capital Const. & Impact Fee) Detail ............ 33-34
Fund 125 (REET II) Detail ................................................ 35
Fund 126 (REET I) Detail ................................................. 36
Fund 143 (Tree) Detail .................................................... 37
Fund 137 (Cemetery) Detail ........................................... 38
Annual Project Comparison ............................................ 39
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 239
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 2
September 30, 2024
Members of the City Council, Parks & Planning Board, Staff and Citizens of Edmonds,
The Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department presents the City of Edmonds Parks 6-year Parks Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The CIP/CFP serve as a planning guide identifying
parks capital projects and related funding sources. It reflects the priorities established in the 2022 Parks,
Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan priorities as well as unforeseen opportunities and demands. The CIP/CFP
is updated annually through a public process including presentations and Public Hearings hosted by both the Parks
& Planning Board and the City Council during the budget process.
Highlights of the 2024 parks capital project accomplishments through August include:
1.Acquisition of the Mee property expands the Mathay Ballinger Park by 50% and the purchase and related
costs were 80% grant funded ($880,000 grant).
2.Demolition of unusable structures, removal of invasive plants and site security of the 1-acre parcel
donated by Shirley Johnson adjacent to Yost was completed.
3.Improvements to the McAleer Lake Ballinger Access area.
4.Installation of automated door locks on all park restrooms to decrease damage and vandalism.
5.Standardization of park entry signage.
6.Replacement of the outdoor shower, an additional foot wash station and installation of ADA compliant
water bottle filler to replace a non-working drinking fountain.
The remaining 2024 capital projects in process include:
1.Improvements continue at Mathay Ballinger Park with installation of a permanent restroom and
remaining improvements including ADA accessible pathway, parking improvement, picnic shelter and
additional park amenities.
2.Completing open space improvements to meet a 2008 State of Washington grant non-compliance issue.
3.Installation of “No Boating” buoys along the Waterfront as resulting from US Coast Guard audit.
Currently, the focus of our capital work is on deferred maintenance throughout the city’s existing parks system
and recreation facilities. With an aging system and lack of adequate asset management through Edmonds’ parks
and facilities, amenities are reaching the end of their useful life and require significant repairs or replacement.
Some of which require significant permitting due to proximity to salmon-bearing waterways.
Another priority in our capital work is addressing ADA accessibility compliance issues both during renovation and
repair work as well as stand-alone new projects to address the issue. Ensuring our parks, trails, open spaces and
recreation facilities and amenities are inclusive and welcoming and equitability available to all Edmond’s residents
and visitors is an emphasis of all our parks capital work.
Your Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department strives to keep our parks safe, accessible, and enjoyable for
all and we are proud to continue to implement the parks capital program to better serve the Edmonds community.
Sincerely,
Angie Feser, Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director
425-771-0256 Angie.Feser@EdmondsWA.gov
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 240
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
2025‐2030 SIX‐YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CFP Project
#Project Site & Description 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
R19
Shell Creek Restoration Phase 2
Project to provide improved environmental health and erosion control of Shell
Creek in Yost Park, may include trail, bridge and boardwalk repair or relocation.
380,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 380,000$
D19
Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD*
Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III
Development. Payment due upon completion of project.
200,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 200,000$
D8
Columbarium Expansion ‐ Phase II
Expansion of the current columbarium. Funding provided through the Cemetery
Trust Fund 137.
175,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 175,000$
X P2
D13
Mee Property
Master plan and future development providing expansion of the Mathay
Ballinger neighborhood park. Property purchased in 2024.
80,000$ ‐$ 250,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 330,000$
X P5
Johnson Property
Master plan for future use and expansion of Yost Park. Site development not
included in estimate. Demolition, debris removal and site security completed in
2023.
‐$ 100,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 100,000$
X P1
D2
Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building
Replace and/or renovate Parks & Facilities Maintenance Shop located in City
Park. Preliminary design in 2026.
‐$ 250,000$ 875,500$ 4,700,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 5,825,500$
D21
R20
Marsh Boardwalk Replacement
Renovation and replacement of northwest Edmonds Marsh boardwalk to include
ADA upgrades.
‐$ 75,000$ 750,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 825,000$
R11
Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation
Repairs and renovations of 50+ year old pool as needed to include a complete
replaster of the pool.
‐$ ‐$ 350,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 350,000$
X D20
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex ‐ Phase I ‐ Lighting
In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park
and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and
future construction of two additional fields.
‐$ ‐$ 1,500,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 1,500,000$
Project Type: A: Acquisition ‐ R: Replacement/Upgrade ‐ P: Master Planning ‐ D: Development (new)
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Page 3
Page 3
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 241
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
2025‐2030 SIX‐YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CFP Project
#Project Site & Description 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
R8
Sierra Park
Replacement of a 25+ year old playground and related improvements to included
ADA compliance.
‐$ ‐$ 50,000$ 350,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 400,000$
D10
D11
D12
Pine Street Park
Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables,
canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway.
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 100,000$ 60,000$ 200,000$ 360,000$
R12
Maplewood Hill Park
Replacement of a nearly 40 year old playground for improved play experience
and ADA compliance.
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 50,000$ 350,000$ ‐$ 400,000$
X P6
D15
Neighborhood Park SR99
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 80,000$ 850,000$ 930,000$
D16
D17
R14
Elm Street Park
Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, small shelter
with picnic tables, habitat restoration and possible addition of a dog park.
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 105,000$ 385,000$ 490,000$
X P7
D18
Neighborhood Park SE 2
Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast
Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase).
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 82,000$ 82,000$
X R15
Pool Replacement
Replacement of the existing Yost pool due to end of life cycle. Design, location,
and funding TBD and consideration of possible partnerships.
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 24,000,000$ 24,000,000$
X
P4
D9
D1
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
Master Plan development and implementation of the Edmonds Marsh to
daylight the waterway connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and
two fresh water creeks providing restoration of fresh water/salt water estuary
and natural tidal exchange. (All expenses are TBD per Council direction in
December 2022). Property acquisition identified in Parkland Acquisition program.
TBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBD ‐$
835,000$ 425,000$ 3,775,500$ 5,200,000$ 595,000$ 25,517,000$ 36,347,500$
Project Type: A: Acquisition ‐ R: Replacement/Upgrade ‐ P: Master Planning ‐ D: Development (new)
Costs inflated at 3% per year
(A)SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS
Page 4
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 242
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
2025‐2030 SIX‐YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Project
#PARKS CIP PROGRAMS 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
R17
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program
Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular, major and deferred
maintenance, repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and
equipment.
450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 2,700,000$
R16
ADA Improvements & Replacement
Ongoing replacement or improvements to meet ADA standards within park
system. (Example is of the Seaview Park restroom replacement and
improvements to pathway).
‐$ 200,000$ 300,000$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 500,000$
Debt Service and Interfund Transfers
Debt service on Civic Park $1.6M bond (2021), Marina Beach Acquisition and
Interfund transfers to Engineering for Capital Project Support.
412,518$ 416,188$ 410,438$ 416,350$ 407,912$ 414,225$ 2,477,630$
862,518$ 1,066,188$ 1,160,438$ 866,350$ 857,912$ 864,225$ 5,677,630$
Project
#PARKLAND ACQUISITION 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
X A3 Neighborhood Park SR99
Acquisition of parkland near SR 99 to fill park system gaps. ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 900,000$ ‐$ ‐$ 900,000$
X A4 Neighborhood Park SE 2
Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds to fill park system gaps.‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 900,000$ ‐$ 900,000$
X A1
Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting)
Acquisition of the Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh
restoration project.
TBDTBDTBDTBDTBDTBD ‐$
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ 900,000$ 900,000$ ‐$ 1,800,000$
1,697,518$ 1,491,188$ 4,935,938$ 6,966,350$ 2,352,912$ 26,381,225$ 43,825,130$
(C)SUBTOTAL ‐ PARKLAND ACQUISITION
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Project Type: A: Acquisition ‐ R: Replacement/Upgrade ‐ P: Master Planning ‐ D: Development (new)
(B)SUBTOTAL ‐ PARKS CIP PROGRAMS
(D)TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B+C)
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Page 5
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 243
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
2025‐2030 SIX‐YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PARKS CIP REVENUE 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I ‐ Fund 126 512,518$ 516,188$ 510,438$ 516,350$ 507,912$ 514,225$ $ 3,077,630
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II ‐ Fund 125 $ 1,110,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 910,000 $ 950,000 $ 6,145,000
Park Impact Fees ‐ Fund 332‐100 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,000
Tree Fund 143 ‐ Land Acquisition $ 70,152 $ 45,749 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 315,901
Cemetery Trust Fund 137 ‐ Columbarium Expansion $ 175,000 $ 175,000
Investment Interest (3%) $ 7,870 $ 8,220 $ 35,132 $ 34,363 $ 46,081 $ 54,385 $ 186,051
Donations $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐
Bond Proceeds $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐
Secured Grants $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐ $‐
Unsecured Grants/Funding ‐ non‐land acquisition $‐ $‐ $ 3,125,000 $ 4,700,000 $ 55,000 $ 24,167,000 $ 32,047,000
2,075,540$ 1,845,157$ 5,070,569$ 6,450,713$ 1,768,993$ 25,935,610$ 43,146,582$
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
(F) Beginning Fund Balance 1,458,932$ 1,846,994$ 2,211,633$ 2,350,684$ 1,842,187$ 1,268,265$
(E) Revenue 2,075,540$ 1,845,157$ 5,070,569$ 6,450,713$ 1,768,993$ 25,935,610$
(D) Expenditures 1,701,518$ 1,495,188$ 4,939,938$ 6,970,350$ 2,556,912$ 26,385,225$
1,832,954$ 2,196,963$ 2,342,265$ 1,831,047$ 1,054,268$ 818,650$
Restricted Land Acquisition Funds: 1,352,583$ 1,509,002$ 1,663,421$ 920,561$ 180,557$ 333,554$
Available Funding (assuming $200K in PIF + Interest): 480,371$ 687,961$ 678,844$ 910,486$ 873,711$ 485,096$
(G)Ending Fund Balance (F+E‐D)
(E)TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE
Parks Fund 6‐Year Overview
Page 6
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 244
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
D19
R19
D20
D21R20
D13P2
D6
P1D2
P4D1D9A1 D10D11D12
D16D17
R14
D8
R11R15
P5
R12
R8
¯
DRAFT August 2024
Parks & Recreation
2025 - 2030 PARKS PROJECTS
Projects
2025
2026-2030
P2,D13D6D19D8R19P5R11D10, D11, D12R8R12P4, D9, D1D16, D17, R14P1, D2R15A1D20D21, R20
R17A3, P6, D15A4, P7, D18R16
Mee PropertyMathay Ballinger ParkLake Ballinger Park (MLT)Columbarium Expansion - Phase IIShell Creek RestorationJohnson PropertyYost Pool RepairPine Street ParkSierra ParkMaplewood Hill ParkEdmonds Marsh RestorationElm Street ParkParks Maintenance BuildingPool ReplacementEdmonds Marsh RestorationWoodway Campus Athletic ComplexMarsh Boardwalk Replacement
* Non-site specific projectsCitywide Park ImprovementsNeighborhood Park SR99Neighborhood Park SE 2ADA Improvements & Replacement
Page 7
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 245
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 8
2025-2030
Parks Capital Improvement Program
& Capital Facilities Plan
PROJECTS
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 246
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 9
Parks & Recreation
Shell Creek Restoration Phase 2 – R19
Shell Creek Valley, Yost Park
Project Summary: The goal of this project is the restoration of the northern portion of Yost Park and may include habitat
and environmental protection and enhancement, mitigation opportunities, bridge, trail and boardwalk
replacement/relocation and concrete structure removal or modification. After completion of the Existing Conditions
Analysis, funding is needed for the next phase which includes scope of work development and may include architecture,
engineering and ecological design, document development to support and start the permit process and potential
construction estimates.
Project Justification: The 45-acre Yost Park, containing a portion of Shell Creek, is experiencing environmental degradation
to the creek’s ecosystem and the bridges are nearing end of life cycle. Shell Creek is identified as a salmon-bearing stream
and erosion and silting issues within Yost Park impact stream bed conditions and spawning habitat within the park and
downstream. This erosion has caused the closure of a pedestrian bridge in the upper creek corridor, resulting in significant
impact to trail users by lack of ability to cross the creek to access both sides of the park. Additional pedestrian bridges are
deteriorating and will require replacement or repair.
2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan - Goal 3: Parks, Trails & Open Space, Objectives 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal
4: Waterfront Use & Access, Objectives 4.2 and 4.4; Goal 5: Natural Resource & Habitat Conservation Objectives, 5.1, 5.3
and 5.4; Goal 6: Climate Change, Adaptation & Resiliency, Objective 6.5; and Goal 9: Park Operations & Administration
Objectives 9.1 and 9.2. PROS Plan Recommendations 3.1, 3.10. 5.2 and 6.2.
Estimated Cost: Phase 1 - $250,000 & Phase 2 - $380,000 = $630,000 total
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (R19) – Bridge, Trail, Stream $380,000 $380,000
Total Expenses $380,000 $380,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II – Fund 125 $380,000 $380,000
Total Revenue $380,000 $630,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 247
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 10
Parks & Recreation
Lake Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA – D19
Lake Ballinger Park, City of Mountlake Terrace
Project Summary: Through an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with the City of Mountlake Terrace, the City of Edmonds will
support the construction of the planned improvements in the northwest area of Lake Ballinger Park including a pedestrian
entry, pathways and access to Lake Ballinger. The ILA was executed in 2023, with the project underway and payment is
due upon completion.
Project Justification: This western boundary of the park is Edmonds city limits, and these improvements will provide better
access to Lake Ballinger Park for Edmonds residents. The revenue contribution supports the construction of the
improvements which will benefit the City of Edmonds. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open
Space (PROS) Plan including a goal, three objectives and three recommendations. PROS Goal 3, Objectives 3.2, 3.8 and
3.11. Recommendation 1.2 Expand partnerships and agreements with other nearby jurisdictions. Recommendation 3.6
Explore options for access to Lake Ballinger with the City of Mountlake Terrace to include possible joint development and
consideration of a fishing pier. Recommendation 5.2 Repair and improve or extend trails and boardwalks to allow
improved public access to natural areas for nature/wildlife viewing, hiking and outdoor experience.
Estimated Cost: $200,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (D19) – ILA $200,000 $200,000
Total Expenses $200,000 $200,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $200,000 $200,000
Total Revenue $200,000 $200,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 248
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 11
Parks & Recreation
Columbarium Expansion Phase 2 – D8
820 15th St SW, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery
Project Summary: Expansion of the existing Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Columbarium. Funding is provided through the
Cemetery Trust Fund 137 which is designated for capital projects such as this. This accumulated fund balance is generated
from revenue collected through ongoing cemetery sales and services.
Project Justification: As the existing columbarium continues to fill up, it is appropriate to begin planning for the Phase 2
expansion to accommodate additional inurnments. The project design was developed with the original design and
therefore, could be relatively simple to implement.
Estimated Cost: $159,100
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (D8) – Columbarium Expansion $159,100 $159,100
Total Expenses $159,100 $159,100
Fund Balance Cemetery Trust – Fund 137 $159,100 $159,100
Total Revenue $159,100 $159,100
Unsecured Funding $0 $0
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 249
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 12
Parks & Recreation
Mee Property – P2, D13
24024 76th Ave.
Project Summary: This project is the Master Planning process supporting development of the recently acquired Mee
Property adjacent to and expanding Mathay Ballinger Park. This planning effort is the next step to providing improvements
to expand the adjacent park and address park services gap and inequities in geographic distribution in underserved areas
of Edmonds. The Master Plan relies on community engagement and will be developed in collaboration with Edmonds
community. Opening this property to the public requires site improvements determined by a community-based Master
Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of new parkland and amenities is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open
Space (PROS) Plan including Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6,
3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10; Goal 5, Objectives 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4; and Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.3, and 6.4. Recommendations
include 6.2 which supports development of a new park and recommendations 3.2 and 3.5.
Estimated Cost: $330,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Planning – Neighborhood Park SE 1 (P2) $80,000 $80,000
Construction – Neighborhood Park SE 1 (D13) $250,000 $250,000
Total Expenses $80,000 $250,000 $330,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $80,000 $80,000
Park Impact Fees – Fund 332-100 $250,000 $250,000
Total Revenue $80,000 $250,000 $330,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Need image of Mee property
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 250
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 13
Parks & Recreation
Johnson Property - P5
9309 Bowdoin Way
Project Summary: This project is for the first phase of design including a Master Plan for the 1-acre property donated by
Shirley Johnson in 2021. The house, outbuildings and invasive plants material were removed in 2023 and the site is
currently secured with fencing. The master planning process uses a combination of park system-wide goals (PROS Plan),
property opportunities and constraints, property donation conditions and community input on future design and usage
for the space as well as providing documentation for grant opportunities for future improvements.
Project Justification: This project is supported by five goals and 11 related objectives and a recommendation of the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. They include Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objectives 3.7, 3.8 and 3.10;
Goal 5, Objective 5.1; Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5; Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.5 support this project. In
addition, Plan Recommendation 3.1 - Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City
properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety applies to this work.
Estimated Cost: $100,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Planning & Design (P5) $100,000 $100,000
Total Expenses $100,000 $100,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
$100,000 $100,000
Total Revenue $100,000 $100,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 251
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 14
Parks & Recreation
Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building - P1 & D2
600 3rd Avenue South, City Park
Project Summary: Replacement of 40+ year old Parks and Facilities Maintenance building and renovation of the yard
area in City Park. Currently undersized to accommodate staff, vehicles and equipment, mechanical workspaces and
employee facilities and the facility is reaching the end of its useful life.
Project Justification: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas
and fixed equipment storage to more efficiently maintain City parks and Capital facilities. The city’s small equipment
repair garage is used as the Park Maintenance locker room, daily meeting room, computer access (two for 17 FTEs) and
work preparation space. It is insufficient for work efficiency and creates a conflicting workspace of small machinery repair
and gathering space. This project is supported by a Goals and three Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open
Space (PROS) Plan including Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.9.
Estimated Cost: $5,825,000
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Planning & Design (P1) $250,000 $875,000 $1,125,000
Construction (D2) $4,700,000 $4,700,000
Total Expenses $250,000 $875,000 $4,700,000 $5,825,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $250,000 $250,000
Bond Proceeds
Operating Contribution – General Fund
Park Donations
Total Revenue $250,000 $250,000
Unsecured Funding $0 ($875,000) ($4,700,000) ($5,575,000)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 252
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 15
Parks & Recreation
Marsh Boardwalk Replacement – D21, R20
180 West Dayton, Edmonds Marsh
Project Summary: Initial work for repair and possible replacement of the failing Marsh Boardwalk. Work may include
evaluation of existing structure, architecture and engineering design for repair or replacement, development of
construction drawings and the start of a complex permitting process.
Project Justification: The deck of the wooden boardwalk is nearing the end of its useful life and the supporting structure
and footings may be starting to settle into the underlying marsh. If this repair/replacement is not completed, there may
need to be closed to the public due to unsafe surface conditions and trip hazards.
2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan - Goal 3: Parks, Trails & Open Space, Objectives 3.4, 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9;
Goal 4: Waterfront Use & Access, Objectives 4.2 and 4.4; Goal 5: Natural Resource & Habitat Conservation Objectives, 5.1,
5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6: Climate Change, Adaptation & Resiliency, Objective 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5; and Goal 9: Park Operations &
Administration Objectives 9.1 and 9.5. PROS Plan Recommendations 3.1 and 3.10, 5.2 and 6.2.
Estimated Cost: $825,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Planning & Design (D21) $75,000 $75,000
Construction (R20) $750,000 $750,000
Total Expenses $75,000 $750,000 $825,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $75,000 $75,000
Total Revenue $75,000 $75,000
Unsecured Funding $0 ($750,000) ($750,000)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 253
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 16
Parks & Recreation
Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation - R11
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: Future pool repair and maintenance to include a full replaster project.
Project Justification: The outdoor Yost Pool, built in the early 1970’s, is more than 50 years old and has numerous
maintenance needs to enable the pool to remain operational and meet safety requirements. These repairs and amenity
replacements are supported in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan including Goal 1, Objective 1.4;
Goal 2, Objective 2.1, Goal 3, Objectives 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4, Objective 4.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.3; Goal 7, Objectives
7.2 and 7.4; Goal 9, Objectives 9.1 and 9.5 and Recommendation 3.1, and 6.2.
Estimated Cost: $350,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (R11) $350,000 $350,000
Total Expenses $350,000 $350,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $350,000 $350,000
Total Revenue $350,000 $350,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 254
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 17
Parks & Recreation
Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase 1 Lighting – D20
23200 100th Ave. W
Project Summary: This project consists of two components: Phase 1 lighting addition, Phase 2 renovation of existing
underdeveloped athletic field and would be coordinated with the property owner, Edmonds School District.
Project Justification: By adding lighting to the renovated Phase 1 year-round field, usage of the multi-use facility would
significantly increase. Phase 2 would renovate a currently poorly maintained and underutilized large athletic field to
provide community significantly more multi-sport use of an existing facility. This Athletic Complex serves a densely
populated area of more than 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance costs could be offset by user
fees. Phase I without lighting installation was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phase II estimated at $6-8M with funding and
timing undetermined. This partnership improvement is supported by a Recommendation, 2 Goals and 5 Objectives in the
2022 PROS Plan including Recommendation 3.2 “expand partnerships and agreements with Edmonds School District…to
provide public access and opportunities for outdoor recreation”. And PROS Plan Goal 3, Objectives 3.3, 3.9, 3.10 and 3.11;
and Goal 9, Objective 9.4.
Estimated Cost: Phase 1 Lighting: $1,500,000; Phase 2: $6 – 8M
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (D20) - Lighting $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Total Expenses $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Park Impact Fees – Fund 332-100
Total Revenue $0 $0
Unsecured Funding ($1,500,000) ($1,500,000)
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Phase 2
Phase 1
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 255
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 18
Parks & Recreation
Sierra Park – R8
81st Ave W & 190th St SW
Project Summary: Replacement of the playground and fall surfacing at Sierra Park. The playground is 27 years old and is
currently the smallest and most limited playground in the park system. The new playground will be ADA accessible and
could be an inclusive level design.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by three Goals and Objectives and two Recommendations in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. The improvement project is supported by Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal
3, Objective 3.8, Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.1. In addition, Recommendation 3.4 states “replace the
playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park”.
Estimated Cost: $400,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (R8) – Playground Replacement $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Total Expenses $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Total Revenue $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 256
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 19
Parks & Recreation
Pine Street Park - D10, D11 & D12
6th and Pine Street
Project Summary: Park improvements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, canopy shade trees and
a paved interior connecting pathway.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the 2022
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.5 is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic
shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park and paved pathway connections in Mathay
Ballinger Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 6.2 also
align with these improvements.
Estimated Cost: $360,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (D10) – Shelter w/Picnic Tables $100,000 $100,000
Construction (D11) – Paved Pathway $35,000 $200,000 $235,000
Construction (D12) – Canopy Shade Trees $25,000 $25,000
Total Expenses $100,000 $60,000 $200,000 $360,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $100,000 $60,000 $200,000 $360,000
Total Revenue $100,000 $60,000 $200,000 $360,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 257
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 20
Parks & Recreation
Maplewood Hill Park – R12
19800 89th Pl W
Project Summary: Replacement of the existing playground installed in 1985. This playground is 38 years old and is the
oldest in the park system.
Project Justification: This improvement is supported by three Goals and Objectives as well as two Recommendations in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9,
Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.1 also align with this improvement. Recommendation 3.4 specifically states “replace
the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park”.
Estimated Cost: $400,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (R12) – Playground Replacement $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Total Expenses $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Total Revenue $50,000 $350,000 $400,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 258
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 21
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SR 99 – P6 & D15
Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SR 99 area to address an existing
gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized (see Land Acquisition
Section for details) a Master Plan should be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Eventual
development of the park will be based on the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by three Goals and 11 Objectives two recommendations in
the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3,
Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a
new park. Recommendation 1 states “to fill the park system gaps…1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in
underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor”.
Estimated Cost: $930,000 + Parkland Acquisition
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Planning – Neighborhood Park SR99 (P6) $80,000 $80,000
Construction – Neighborhood Park SR 99 (D15) $850,000 $850,000
Total Expenses $80,000 $850,000 $930,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Park Impact Fees – Fund 332-100 $80,000 $850,000 $930,000
Total Revenue $80,000 $850,000 $930,000
Unsecured Funding
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 259
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 22
Parks & Recreation
Elm Street Park - D16, D17 & R14
7th & Elm Street
Project Summary: Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, small shelter with picnic tables,
habitat restoration and public process to consider possible off-leash dog park area.
Project Justification: These improvements are supported by two Goals and Objectives and two Recommendations in the
2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 6, Objective 6.5; Goal 9, Objective 9.1; and
Recommendation 3.5 support these improvements. Recommendation 3.1 is to “add amenities to existing parks, such as
picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park”.
Estimated Cost: $490,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (R14) – Habitat Restoration $55,000 $55,000
Construction (D16) – Nature Play & Dog park $50,000 $300,000 $350,000
Construction (D17) – Shelter w/Picnic Tables $85,000 $85,000
Total Expenses $105,000 $385,000 $490,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $50,000 $300,000 $350,000
Total Revenue $50,000 $300,000 $350,000
Unsecured Funding (55,000) ($85,000) ($140,000)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 260
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 23
Parks & Recreation
Neighborhood Park SE 2 – P7, D18
Project Summary: Design and future development of an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address
an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition (see Land Acquisition Section
for details) has been authorized a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community.
Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan.
Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by three Goals and 11 Objectives and two
Recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan including Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2,
Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 support the
development of a new park. Recommendation 1 states “to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for
neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor”.
Estimated Cost: $82,000 + Parkland Acquisition
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Planning – Neighborhood Park SE 2 (P7) $82,000 $82,000
Construction – Neighborhood Park SE 2 (D18)
Total Expenses $82,000 $82,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Total Revenue
Unsecured Funding ($82,000) ($82,000)
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 261
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 24
Parks & Recreation
Yost Pool Replacement – R15
96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park
Project Summary: Yost Pool was built nearly 50 years ago and continues to provide recreational opportunities for many
residents and visitors. In addition to teaching youth lifesaving water safety, the pool serves as an opportunity for
community members of all ages to lead healthy and active lifestyles. Funding for this project has not been identified, may
need partnerships and would likely require voter approval.
Project Justification: Replacing Yost Pool is supported by four Goals and six Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and
Open Space (PROS) Plan lists Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objectives 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 7, Objective 7.4; Goal 9,
Objective 9.1 and Recommendations 3.1, 4.1, 4.2 and 6.2. Recommendation 4 actually states “replace Yost Pool”.
Estimated Cost: $24,000,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Planning & Construction (R15) $24,000,000 $24,000,000
Total Expenses $24,000,000 $24,000,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Secured Grants
Bonds
Total Revenue $0 $0
Unsecured Funding ($24,000,000) ($24,000,000)
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 262
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 25
Parks & Recreation
Edmonds Marsh-Estuary Expansion & Restoration - A1, P4, D9 & D1
Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh, Marina Beach Park and property owned by Unocal (Chevron)
Project Summary: Reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh near-shore estuary by restoring the natural tidal
exchange. This project will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation including daylighting of
Willow Creek within the park and the Edmonds Marsh. In addition, this project encompasses the possible acquisition or
use of the adjacent 21-acre parcel known as the Unocal property to support a larger estuary restoration project. Once
acquired, an integrated restoration plan can be developed to restore functioning conditions of the tidal wetland for
salmon recovery, wildlife conservation and improved public access for recreational use, environmental education and
wildlife viewing.
Project Justification: The marsh estuary restoration project will allow for and provide a natural tidal exchange, allow
salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek, support migratory birds and waterfowl, provide a natural redistribution of
saltwater-freshwater flora and fauna and address sea level rise impacts. This project is supported by 3 Recommendations,
5 Goals and 8 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 2.2 – Expand the
Edmonds Marsh/Estuary to include the Unocal property. Develop funding strategy for purchase of the Unocal property or
negotiate with the State of Washington to have the property become part of the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary. PROS Plan
Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 4, Objective 4.3; Goal 5, Objectives 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.5 and 6.7; Goal 9,
Objective 9.1; Recommendation 2.1 and 3.11 also align with this project.
Estimated Cost: TBD Acquisition and Planning + Restoration + Marina Beach Park renovation
Continued on next page.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 263
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 26
Edmonds Marsh-Estuary Expansion & Restoration– continued.
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Land Acquisition (A1) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Master Plan (P4) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Master Plan Implementation (D9) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Restoration (D1) - TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Total Expenses TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125
Real Estate Excise Tax I – Fund 126
Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees
Bond Proceeds
Secured Grants
Tree Fund 143 – Land Acquisition
Park Donations
Operating Contribution – General Fund
Stormwater – Fund 422
Total Revenue TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Unsecured Funding TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Project Accounting #M070
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
Expense estimates and funding sources changed to TBD per Council direction December 2022.
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 264
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 27
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement
& Capital Facilities Plan
PROGRAMS
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 265
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 28
Parks & Recreation
Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program - R17
Project Summary: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) plan identified a significant list of deferred park
maintenance projects. With the addition of a Parks Capital Project Manager, hired in 2022 and the Job Order Contracting
program, the Parks Department will continue to make progress on the numerous system-wide repairs, renovations and
replacements of an aging parks infrastructure and ADA accessibility.
Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and related assets lead to higher deferred maintenance costs,
increased City liability and decreased level of service and community satisfaction. This program is supported by six Goals
and 21 Objectives and five Recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan. These include
Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objectives 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2, and 4.4; Goal 5,
Objectives 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4; Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5 and 6.7; and Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.9.
Recommendation 3.1 is “Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to
ensure public accessibility, use and safety” and additional recommendations are found in 3.7, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4.
Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 (6-year total)
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Repair & Maintenance $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000
Professional Services $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000
Total Expenses $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000
Total Revenue $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 266
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 29
Parks & Recreation
ADA Improvements / Replacement – R16
Project Summary: Systemic accessibility installations, upgrades, replacements and or renovations are needed throughout
the City of Edmonds parks, open spaces, trails and recreation facilities and amenities. Examples of projects include Seaview
Park restroom access and pathway to the playground, ADA compliant access in the Marina Beach Park dog park and
Edmonds Marsh viewing pier and platform and among other numerous projects throughout the city parks and city-owned
public spaces. This funding to be used for professional design, permits and arranging construction of these projects.
Project Justification: In addition to building code compliance and ADA requirements, these improvements are supported
by three goals and objectives and three recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Included are Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objectives 3.3, 3.7, 3.8 and 3,9; and Goal 9, Objective 9.1. Recommendations
3.1 “ensuring public accessibility” and 6.2 includes “improvements to park facilities to conform with American with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure universal accessibility”. In addition, recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate
restrooms at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park and Brackett's Landing North.
Estimated Cost: $500,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Construction (R16) $200,000 $300,000 $500,000
Total Expenses $200,000 $300,000 $500,000
Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $200,000 $300,000 $500,000
Total Revenue $200,000 $300,000 $500,000
Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 267
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 30
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement
& Capital Facilities Plan
PARKLAND
ACQUISITION
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 268
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 31
Parks & Recreation
Parkland Acquisition – Neighborhood Park SR 99 & SE 2 - A3 & A4
Project Summary: Acquisition of parkland that will benefit the Edmond community and support the priorities identified
in the PROS Plan. Currently, $1,140,625 is reserved for parkland and open space acquisition. These funds were
accumulated from 2019 through 2024. There is no specific request to purchase a particular parcel as opportunities are
somewhat limited in a mostly built-out city, but staff continues to search for, develop and negotiate opportunities.
Project Justification: Parkland acquisitions are supported by two Goals and five Objectives (land purchase only, see
previous projects for development) and a Recommendation in the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan.
Those include Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.9 also support the acquisition of parkland.
Recommendation 1 is to “Fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such
as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor”.
Estimated Cost: $1,800,000
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Total
Acquisition – Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3) $900,000 $900,000
Acquisition – Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4) $900,000 $900,000
Total Expenses $900,000 $900,000 $1,800,000
Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $900,000 $700,000 $1,600,000
Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD $200,000 $200,000
Snohomish County Conservation Futures
Total Revenue $900,000 $900,000 $1,800,000 $0
*Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 269
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Page 32
2024-2029
Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan
FUND DETAIL
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 270
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
C
I
P
)
)
Fund 332
Fund 332 Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
D9 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan Implementation) $‐
D1 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Restoration) $‐
R14 Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration $ 55,000 $ 55,000
D17 Elm Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ 85,000 $ 85,000
R20 Marsh Boardwalk Replacement $ 750,000 $ 750,000
D13 Mee Property (Park Development) $ 250,000 $ 250,000
D15 Neighborhood Park ‐ SR99 (Park Development) $ 80,000 $ 850,000 $ 930,000
D18 Neighborhood Park ‐ SE2 (Park Development)82,000$ $ 82,000
R15 Pool Replacement 24,000,000$ $ 24,000,000
P1 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design) $ 875,500 $ 875,500
D2 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Construction) $ 4,700,000 $ 4,700,000
D20 Woodway Campus Athletic Complex ‐ Phase I ‐ Lighting $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
‐$ ‐$ 3,375,500$ 4,700,000$ 135,000$ 25,017,000$ 33,227,500$
Fund 332 Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
Park Impact Fees (Fund 332‐100) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,000
Miscellaneous Park Donations $‐
Bond Proceeds $‐
Park Impact Fees ‐ Mee Property (Park Development) $ 250,000 $ 250,000
Park Impact Fees ‐ Neighborhood Park SR99 (Development) $ 80,000 $ 850,000 $ 930,000
Unsecured Funding ‐ Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase I $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
Unsecured Grants ‐ Marsh Estuary Restoration $‐
Unsecured Grants ‐ Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration & Shelter $ 55,000 $ 85,000 $ 140,000
Unsecured Grants ‐ Neighborhood Park SE 2 (Development) $ 82,000 $ 82,000
Unsecured Funding (Bonds, Levy, Misc.) Pool Replacement $ 24,000,000 $ 24,000,000
Unsecured Funding Park Facilities M&O Building $ 875,000 $ 4,700,000 $ 5,575,000
Unsecured Grants ‐ Marsh Walkway Replacement $ 750,000 $ 750,000
200,000$ 200,000$ 3,575,000$ 4,900,000$ 335,000$ 25,217,000$ 37,357,000$
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
(E) Beginning Fund Balance (332)106,309$ 110,729$ 115,349$ 120,617$ 126,648$ 132,980$
(F) Investment Interest (5%)4,420$ 4,620$ 5,767$ 6,031$ 6,332$ 6,649$
(D) Revenue ‐ Non Park Impact Fees ‐$ ‐$ 3,375,000$ 4,700,000$ 135,000$ 25,017,000$
(C) Expenditures ‐$ ‐$ 3,375,500$ 4,700,000$ 135,000$ 25,017,000$
110,729$ 115,349$ 120,617$ 126,648$ 132,980$ 139,629$
Costs inflated at 3% per year
(C) TOTAL Fund 332 Expenditures
(D) TOTAL Fund 332 Revenue
Fund 332 Parks Fund 6‐Year Overview
(H) Ending Fund Balance (E+F+D‐C)
Page 33
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 271
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
Fund 332
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
(E) Beginning Fund Balance (332‐100) ‐ Park Impact Fees 180,232$ 383,682$ 587,282$ 566,646$ 794,978$ 954,727$
(F) Investment Interest (5%)3,450$ 3,600$ 29,364$ 28,332$ 39,749$ 47,736$
(D) Revenue ‐ Park Impact Fees Only 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$
(C) Expenditures ‐$ ‐$ 250,000$ ‐$ 80,000$ 850,000$
383,682$ 587,282$ 566,646$ 794,978$ 954,727$ 352,464$
Project Type:
A Acquisition
P Master Planning
D Development ‐ New
R Replacement / Upgrade
(I) Ending Fund Balance (E+F+D‐C)
Fund 332‐100 Fund Park Impact Fee 6‐Year Overview
Page 34
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 272
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
REET II Fund 125
REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
P4 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan) $‐
D16 Elm Street Park (Nature Playground & Dog Park) $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ 350,000
P5 Johnson Property (Master Plan) $ 100,000 $ 100,000
R12 Maplewood Hill Park (Playground Replacement) $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ 400,000
R20 Marsh Boardwalk Replacement (Design) $ 75,000 $ 75,000
D19 Mountlake Terrace ILA (Lake Ballinger Park)* $ 200,000 $ 200,000
P2 Mee Property ‐ (Master Plan) $ 80,000 $ 80,000
P1 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design) $ 250,000 $ 250,000
D10 Pine Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ 100,000 $ 100,000
D11 Pine Street Park (Paved Connecting Pathway) $ 35,000 $ 200,000 $ 235,000
D12 Pine Street Park (Canopy Shade Trees) $ 25,000 $ 25,000
R19 Shell Creek Restoration Phase 2 (Yost Park) $ 380,000 $ 380,000
R8 Sierra Park (Playground Replacement) $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ 400,000
R11 Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation $ 350,000 $ 350,000
R16 ADA Improvements (Seaview Restroom & Pathway) $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 500,000
R17 Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ 450,000$ $ 2,700,000
1,110,000$ 1,075,000$ 1,150,000$ 950,000$ 910,000$ 950,000$ 6,145,000$
REET II (Fund 125) Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II ‐ Fund 125 $ 1,110,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 910,000 $ 950,000 $ 6,145,000
1,110,000$ 1,075,000$ 1,150,000$ 950,000$ 910,000$ 950,000$ 6,145,000$
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
(E) Beginning Fund Balance ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$
(D) Revenue 1,110,000$ 1,075,000$ 1,150,000$ 950,000$ 910,000$ 950,000$
(C) Expenditures 1,110,000$ 1,075,000$ 1,150,000$ 950,000$ 910,000$ 950,000$
‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$ ‐$
(C) TOTAL PARKS REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
REET II (Fund 125) Parks Fund 6‐Year Overview
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D‐C)
Costs inflated at 3% per year
*Project added via Council amendment in 2023 Page 35
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 273
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
REET I Fund 126
REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
A1 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Acquisition) $‐
A2 Neighborhood Park ‐ SE1 (Acquisition) $‐
A3 Neighborhood Park ‐ SR99 (Acquisition) $ 900,000 $ 900,000
A4 Neighborhood Park ‐ SE2 (Acquisition) $ 700,000 $ 700,000
Debt Interest & Principal (Civic & Marina Beach) $ 412,518 $ 416,188 $ 410,438 $ 416,350 $ 407,912 $ 414,225 $ 2,477,630
412,518$ 416,188$ 410,438$ 1,316,350$ 1,107,912$ 414,225$ $ 4,077,630
REET I (Fund 126) Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I ‐ Fund 126 ‐ Land Acquisition $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 600,000
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I ‐ Fund 126 ‐ Debt Interest & Principal $ 412,518 $ 416,188 $ 410,438 $ 416,350 $ 407,912 $ 414,225 $ 2,477,630
512,518$ 516,188$ 510,438$ 516,350$ 507,912$ 514,225$ 3,077,630$
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
(E) Beginning Fund Balance 1,140,625$ 1,240,625$ 1,340,625$ 1,440,625$ 640,625$ 40,625$
(D) Revenue 512,518$ 516,188$ 510,438$ 516,350$ 507,912$ 514,225$
(C) Expenditures 412,518$ 416,188$ 410,438$ 1,316,350$ 1,107,912$ 414,225$
1,240,625$ 1,340,625$ 1,440,625$ 640,625$ 40,625$ 140,625$
(C) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures
(D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue
REET I (Fund 126) Parks Fund 6‐Year Overview
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D‐C)
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Page 36
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 274
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
TREE Fund 143
TREE (Fund 143) Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
Park and Open Space Acquisition Program $‐
Mee Property Acquisition $‐
A4 Neighborhood Park ‐ SE2 (Acquisition)200,000$ $ 200,000
Tree Board Supplies and Minute Taker 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ $ 24,000
4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 204,000$ 4,000$ 224,000$
TREE (Fund 143) Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
Tree ‐ Fund 143 $ 70,152 $ 45,749 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 315,901
Investment Interest (@5%) $ 14,040 $ 14,670 $ 8,419 $ 11,140 $ 13,997 $ 6,997 $ 69,262
84,192$ 60,419$ 58,419$ 61,140$ 63,997$ 56,997$ 385,163$
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
(E) Beginning Fund Balance 31,766$ 111,958$ 168,377$ 222,796$ 279,936$ 139,932$
(D) Revenue 84,192$ 60,419$ 58,419$ 61,140$ 63,997$ 56,997$
(C) Expenditures 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 204,000$ 4,000$
111,958$ 168,377$ 222,796$ 279,936$ 139,932$ 192,929$
(C) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Expenditures
(D) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Revenue
TREE (Fund 143) 6‐Year Overview
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D‐C)
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Page 37
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 275
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
CEMETERY Trust Fund 137
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
D8 Columbarium Expansion ‐ Phase II 175,000$ $ 175,000
Repair & Maintenance 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ $ 150,000
200,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 325,000$
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6‐Year Total
Cemetery Trust ‐ Fund 137 Investment Interest (@5%) $ 77,880 $ 81,400 $ 70,091 $ 73,145 $ 76,352 $ 79,720 $ 458,588
Cemetery Trust ‐ Fund 137 Sales Revenue $ 18,540 $ 19,096 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 101,636
96,420$ 100,496$ 86,091$ 89,145$ 92,352$ 95,720$ 560,224$
2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
(E) Beginning Fund Balance 1,429,895$ 1,326,315$ 1,401,811$ 1,462,902$ 1,527,047$ 1,594,399$
(D) Revenue 96,420$ 100,496$ 86,091$ 89,145$ 92,352$ 95,720$
(C) Expenditures 200,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$
1,326,315$ 1,401,811$ 1,462,902$ 1,527,047$ 1,594,399$ 1,665,119$
(C) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust(Fund 137) Expenditures
(D) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue
CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) 6‐Year Overview
(G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D‐C)
Costs inflated at 3% per year
Page 38
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 276
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
PARKS CIP / CFP COMPARISON 2025 ‐ 30 vs. 2024‐29
Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
Parks ADA Improvements & Replacement Ongoing replacement or improvements to meet ADA Standards.
Parks Marsh Boardwalk Replacement Renovation and replacement of NW Edmonds Marsh Boardwalk to include ADA upgrades.
Parks Mee Property Master Plan X Was part of Parkland Acquisition, now stand alone project.
Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION
Parks Interurban Trail Extension Removed due to lack of available funding.
Parks Mathay Ballinger Park Project completion scheduled for 2024.
Parks Neighborhood Park SE 1Mee Property Purchased in 2024. Master Plan listed above as new item.
Parks Olympic Beach Park Restroom Interior renovation completed.
Parks Parkland Acquisition Support Removed, will be requested if/when potential acquisition is identified.
Parks Signage & Wayfinding Project completion scheduled for 2024.
Parks Waterfront Walkway (missing link) Removed due to lack of available funding and other capital priorities.
Parks Yost Park Playground Improvements Project expenses deemed replacement as not feasible at this time.
Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE
Parks Elm Street Park Improvements Moved to 2029‐30 vs. 2028‐29.
Parks Johnson Property Master Plan X Expenditure estimate updated to reflect more current pricing.
Parks Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA ILA completed in 2023; payment due upon construction completion estimated for 2025, carryforward.
Parks Maplewood Hill Park Improvements Moved to 2028‐29 vs. 2027.
Parks Neighborhood Park SE 2 X Acquisition moved to 2029 vs. 2026 and Master Plan moved to 2030 vs. 2027.
Parks Neighborhood Park SR 99 X Acquisition moved to 2028 vs. 2025 and Master Plan/Construction moved to 2029‐30 vs. 2026‐27.
Parks Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building X Construction shifted to 2028 vs. 2027; preliminary design funded via REET Fund 125.
Parks Pine Street Park Improvements Moved to 2028, 29 & 30 vs. 2025‐26.
Parks Pool Replacement X Moved to 2030 vs. 2029.
Parks Seaview Park Restroom Replacement Moved into ADA Improvements & Replacement Program 2026‐2027 vs. 2028.
Parks Sierra Park Improvements Moved to 2027‐28 vs. 2026.
Parks Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase 1XMoved to 2027 vs. 2025 due to required ESD partnership development and coordination.
Parks Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation Moved to 2027 vs. 2025.
Parks Yost Pool Replacement XReplacement of existing pool ‐ moved to 2030 vs. 2029.
PROJECTS REVISED
PROJECTS ADDED
PROJECTS REMOVED
Page 39
7.B.b
Packet Pg. 277
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
P
a
r
k
s
C
I
P
_
C
F
P
D
R
A
F
T
(
2
0
2
5
-
2
0
3
0
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
(
C
F
P
)
a
n
d
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/11/2024
Draft Recommendation on Green Building Incentives
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michael Clugston
Background/History
The Planning Board discussed this topic several times during 2024 and held a public hearing about it on
June 12. The project is ready to move forward to review by City Council but needs a recommendation on
the proposed code changes from the Planning Board.
Staff Recommendation
Discuss the draft recommendation on the Green Building Incentive code update and make a
recommendation to City Council.
Narrative
NA
Attachments:
Draft Memo PB Green Building Recommendation to Council V.3
8.A
Packet Pg. 278
DRAFT MEMO
September 11, 2024
To: Edmonds City Council Members
From: Edmonds Planning Board Members
Subject: PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION REGARDING GREEN BUILDING INCENTIVES
Background
The 2023 Edmonds Climate Action Plan included a provision that Edmonds could “create and
implement a green building incentive program” (action BE-2.2). This was intended to address the
fact that Edmonds’ buildings produce a third of greenhouse gas emissions within Edmonds.
(Edmonds 2017 GHG Inventory, p. 12). Green buildings reduce those greenhouse gas emissions as
well as reduce electricity consumption. The program discussed in this memo implements action
BE-2.2 of the Climate Action Plan.
The Proposed Green Building Program
The proposed Green Building Program provides developers incentives if they construct buildings
that meet the requirements for a Built Green 4-star certification, and obtain that certification.
Incentives
The proposed incentives for the program include:
• Expedited permit review
• Additional 5 feet in height
• Smaller setbacks, matching the setbacks of the next smallest zone (for example, an RS-12
site would have to meet RS-10 setbacks)
• Reduced parking requirement to 1 space per unit
• Additional 5% of structural lot coverage for ADUs
Penalties
If a developer participated in the program by constructing a building and received the incentives,
but failed to obtain a certification, the builder would be penalized in the form of forfeiting to the City
of Edmonds bonds equaling:
• 50% of the building permit fee, and
• 5% of the project valuation
Planning Board Review and Public Comment
The Planning Board met with staff from the Planning and Development Department on four
separate occasions between January and July 2024 to discuss a staff proposal for a new Green
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 279
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
M
e
m
o
P
B
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
V
.
3
(
D
r
a
f
t
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
I
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
)
Building Incentives program. These Planning Board meetings included a public hearing held on June
12.
Staff shared the objectives, proposed methods and desired outcomes of the program in
presentations to the Board members. The Planning Board members discussed the program
following the staff presentations. While Planning Board members thought staff performed sufficient
research and outreach and involved the appropriate stakeholders, there was much discussion
about the incentives and penalties proposed for the program. Staff provided refinements to the
proposed penalties as a result of Planning Board input to have penalties that are appropriately
scaled.
Planning Board Recommendation
At the July 24 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board voted to recommend that City Council
approve the proposed Green Building program.
8.A.a
Packet Pg. 280
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
M
e
m
o
P
B
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
V
.
3
(
D
r
a
f
t
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
I
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
)
Planning Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 09/11/2024
Extended Agenda
Staff Lead: Michael Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michael Clugston
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Discuss the attached extended agenda.
Narrative
N/A
Attachments:
September 11 Extended Agenda
10.A
Packet Pg. 281
.13
-
M
a
r
27
-
M
a
r
10
-
A
p
r
24
-
A
p
r
8-
M
a
y
22
-
M
a
y
12
-
J
u
n
26
-
J
u
n
10
-
J
u
l
24
-
J
u
l
6-
A
u
g
14
-
A
u
g
20
-
A
u
g
28
-
A
u
g
11
-
S
e
p
25
-
S
e
p
9-
O
c
t
23
-
O
c
t
13
-
N
o
v
27
-
N
o
v
11
-
D
e
c
16
-
D
e
c
25
-
D
e
c
1/
8
/
2
0
2
5
22
-
J
a
n
28
-
J
a
n
12
-
F
e
b
26
-
F
e
b
12
-
M
a
r
26
-
M
a
r
2-
A
p
r
23
-
A
p
r
Comprehensive Plan
Joint Discussion w/EDC D/R D/R
Final Review Draft Alternatives D/R
Housing Policy Discussion D/R
Transportation D/R D/R
Land Use D/R D/R D/R
Housing D/R D/R D/R
Draft DEIS Impacts and Preliminary Mitigations D/R
Waterfront Vision - Preliminary Concept D/R
Draft EIS Comments Summary D/R
FEIS/Preferred Plan Framework D/R
Preferred Plan Recommendation D/R
Code Updates
Critical Aquifer Recharge D/R
CAO Update (RCW 36.70A.130 - end 2025)
Tree Code Update
Detached Accessory Dwelling Units (HB 1337 - mid 2025) D/R D/R
Green Building Incentives D/R PH D/R
Climate Legislative Package I PH
Land use permit timelines (SB 5290 - end 2024)R PH
Middle Housing (HB 1110 - mid 2025) I D/R D/R PH D/R
Design standards and processes (HB 1293 - mid 2025), including
multfamily design standards I D/R PH D/R
Long Range
Capital Improvement Program/Capital Facilties Plan I PH
Tree Canopy Policy D/R
Administrative
Site specific rezone request PH
Election of Officers D/R
Planning & Development Annual Work Plan B
Annual Retreat I
Planning Board report to City Council D/R B
Parks, Recreation & Human Services Report R B
KEY
I- Introduction & Discussion
PH- Public Hearing
D/R- Discussion/Recommendation
B- Briefing/Q&A
R- Report with no briefing/presentation
Regular meeting cancelled
January 28, 2025 is a presentation to Council
December 16, 2024 is a special meeting
Comp Plan Implementation
September 11, 2024 is a special meeting at 6PM
Planning Board Extended Agenda - September 11, 2024
Future Items
Code Modernization Projects:
1. Unified Development Code (late 2025 - 2026)
Neighborhood Center/Hub Plans
Highway 99 Community Renewal Program
10.A.a
Packet Pg. 282
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
1
1
E
x
t
e
n
d
e
d
A
g
e
n
d
a
(
E
x
t
e
n
d
e
d
A
g
e
n
d
a
)