Loading...
2024-09-11 Planning Board Packet41 OE LUMG do Agenda Edmonds Planning Board REGULAR MEETING BRACKETT ROOM 121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020 SEPTEMBER 11, 2024, 7:00 PM REMOTE MEETING INFORMATION: Meeting Link:https://edmondswa- gov.zoom.us/s/87322872194?pwd=WFdxTWJIQmxITG9LZkc3KOhuS014QT09 Meeting ID: 873 2287 2194 Passcode:007978 This is a Hybrid meeting: The meeting can be attended in -person or on-line. The physcial meeting location is at Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue N., 3rd floor Brackett R000m Or Telephone :US: +1 253 215 8782 LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES We acknowledge the original inhabitants of this place, the Sdohobsh (Snohomish) people and their successors the Tulalip Tribes, who since time immemorial have hunted, fished, gathered, and taken care of these lands. We respect their sovereignty, their right to self-determination, and we honor their sacred spiritual connection with the land and water. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Previous Meeting Minutes 3. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. AUDIENCE COMMENTS For topics not scheduled for a public hearing. Please limit your comments to 3 minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS PUBLIC HEARINGS NEW BUSINESS A. Preliminary Waterfront Vision Design Concept B. 2025-2030 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Draft Recommendation on Green Building Incentives SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA Edmonds Planning Board Agenda September 11, 2024 Page 1 A. Extended Agenda 11. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS 12. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS 13. ADJOURNMENT Edmonds Planning Board Agenda September 11, 2024 Page 2 2.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/11/2024 Previous Meeting Minutes Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning & Development Prepared By: Michelle Martin Background/History July 24 Special Meeting Minutes had recommended edits to clarify for transcription. Staff Recommendation 1. Review and approve meeting minutes from August 28th regular meeting. 2. Clarify edits from July 24 Special meeting minute changes. Narrative August 28th meeting minutes attached. July 24 special 6pm meeting minutes attached. Attachments: PB 08282024_draft PB 07242024 Special Mtg Packet Pg. 3 2.A.a CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Hybrid Meeting August 28, 2024 Vice Chair Golembiewski called the hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 7:01 p.m. at Edmonds City Hall and on Zoom. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES The Land Acknowledgement was read by Board Member Hankins. Board Members Present Staff Present Lauren Golembiewski, Vice Chair Mike Clugston, Acting Planning Manager Judi Gladstone Amber Brokenshire, Associate Planner Lee Hankins Nick Maxwell Steven Li Isaac Fontin, Student Rep. Board Members Absent Jeremy Mitchell, Chair (excused) Susanna Martini A. Student Representative to Planning Board Isaac Fortin was introduced to the Board as a candidate for the student representative position. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER LI, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, TO APPROVE ISAAC FONTIN AS THE PLANNING BOARD STUDENT REPRESENTATIVE. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. READING/APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. JULY 24, 2024 SPECIAL MEETING (6:00 P.M.) MINUTES This item was continued to the next meeting so amendments can be made. B. JULY 24, 2024 REGULAR MEETING (7:00 P.M.) MINUTES MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE DULY 24, 2024 REGULAR MEETING (7:00 Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 28, 2024 Pagel of 3 Packet Pg. 4 2.A.a P.M.) AS PRESENTED. MOTION PASSED (5-0) WITH VICE CHAIR GOLEMBIEWSKI ABSTAINING. ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA Vice Chair Golembiewski requested the addition of a discussion about a Green Building Incentives memo under Unfinished Business. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER HANKINS, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER LI, TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. MOTION PASSED (5-0) WITH BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE ABSTAINING. AUDIENCE COMMENTS None ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS None PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Public hearing on code amendments to update land use permit processes per SB 5290 and HB 1105 (AMD2024-0002) Associate Planner Amber Brokenshire made the staff presentation giving an overview of Senate Bill 5290, streamlining measures, and implementation of Substitute House Bill 1105. The group debated the proposed amendments including permit review timeline requirements, the annual performance report, and the refund process language. Public Testimony: None The public hearing was closed at 7:47 p.m. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE, TO RECOMMEND THE DRAFT CODE FOR APPROVAL WITH THE CAVEAT THAT IF STAFF FINDS THEY CAN REMOVE THE LANGUAGE REGARDING REFUNDS, THAT IT BE REMOVED. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Green Building Incentives Memo Vice Chair Golembiewski read the memo into the record. Board members brought up details they would like to add or clarify to the memo. Board Member Maxwell and Board Member Gladstone will work on some amendments to the memo and bring it back to the next meeting. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 28, 2024 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 5 2.A.a PLANNING BOARD EXTENDED AGENDA September l I — Transportation; Waterfront Vision; Introduction to the Capital Improvement Program/Capital Facilities Plan. There will be a special meeting starting at 6:00 p.m. There was some discussion about when the draft EIS will be issued given recent staff changes and what the Board's involvement with that will be like going forward. The group reviewed other topics to be addressed throughout the rest of year. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Board Member Hankins gave a report on the last meeting of the Economic Development Commission. The EDC discussed tax increment financing and if it can be used to potentially fund a Highway 99 Landmark -area N project. They also were introduced to a software application called Business Booster 2.0 intended to assist people who want to open businesses in the area. Board Member Hankins requested that going forward staff provide a link to slides that are used in meetings. E as a� The Board expressed appreciation to Planning Manager Clugston for his perseverance in light of significant U) staffing challenges and encouraged him to maintain communication with the Board about issues as they come o Up. L n Board Member Gladstone was pleased to have a student representative again. PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS Vice Chair Golembiewski thanked everyone for being patient with her as she chaired the meeting tonight. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Planning Board Meeting Minutes August 28, 2024 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 6 2.A.b CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING BOARD Minutes of Special Meeting July 24, 2024 Chair Mitchell called the special hybrid meeting of the Edmonds Planning Board to order at 6:00 p.m. at Edmonds City Hall and on Zoom. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES The Land Acknowledgement was read by Board Member Li. Board Members Present Staff Present Jeremy Mitchell, Chair Judi Gladstone Lee Hankins Nick Maxwell Steven Li Board Members Absent Lauren Golembiewski (excused) Susanna Martini Susan McLaughlin, Development Services Director Navyusha Pentakota, Urban Design Planner ANNOUNCEMENT OF AGENDA THERE WAS UNANIMOUS CONSENT TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS PRESENTED. AUDIENCE COMMENTS None UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Land Use Goals/Policies and Housing Elements Subcommittee chairs summarized the subcommittees' comments and recommendations on the draft Land Use Goals and the Housing Element. Both groups expressed a desire to restructure the existing documents; condense the number of goals; and clarify goals, policies, and actions/missions. Kirkland was mentioned as an understandable model for goals and policies for land use. A concern was raised about the focus on low income and affordable housing to the exclusion of every other type of home in Edmonds without addressing existing neighborhoods. There was a recommendation to retain material from the 2020 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element about single-family residential neighborhoods. U) as c a� c as 4) 2 U) M 0 as L n Planning Board Special Meeting Minutes July 24, 2024 Pagel of 3 Packet Pg. 7 2.A.b Staff explained that there are no more single-family residential neighborhoods because of state legislation. There was a recommendation to look to see how Kirkland addressed this. It was noted that new terms would be needed to discuss this topic. Board members also noted that some items should be reconsidered which are out of the City's purview. They pointed out a need to strengthen the focus on developing around centers and hubs. Staff invited the subcommittees to present their recommendations in a joint City Council/Planning Board meeting on August 6. There was discussion about the process going forward. Land Use Goals/Policies The group debated land use goals and policies related to equity. U) MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE, TO REQUEST THE "TOP BOX" REGARDING EQUITY BECOME THE LAND USE POLICY AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, UNDERSTANDING THEY ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT a, THE GROWTH IN HUBS AND CENTERS. as 4) Goals and policies promote equity by promoting development in underserved neighborhoods where � infrastructure and public resources (for example, parks, trails, libraries, community centers, o sidewalks, storm water systems, tea) are currently weaker than they are in other places. L n This includes not adding more infrastructure and public assets where they are already plentiful and strong. For example, not adding more public facilities and resources to Downtown or the Creative District. Equity means having Edmonds work as well for every Edmonds resident as it does for everyone else This policy includes dropping policies L U-1.1, L U-3.1, L U-3.2, L U-S 1. There was a question if the focus on equity was the best way to get the results they want. How can they invest in all the neighborhoods in a thoughtful way in order to benefit the entire city? Staff brought up the importance of Edmonds' two activity centers in the GMA framework. Policies that seem in conflict with each other were discussed. There was discussion about having a holistic approach to certain policies rather than just geographic. BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE MADE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT THAT THE MOTION INCLUDE REVISING THE POLICIES LISTED INSTEAD OF DROPPING THEM (EXCEPT LU- 3.1). BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE MADE ANOTHER FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO MODIFY THE FIRST SENTENCE TO SAY, "GOALS AND POLICIES PROMOTE EQUITY BY PROMOTING INVESTING IN DEVELOPMENT IN UNDERSERVED ..." MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0) TO APPROVE THE MOTION AS AMENDED. Sexually Oriented Businesses: Planning Board Special Meeting Minutes July 24, 2024 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 8 2.A.b It was recommended that this goal be removed since it is not required. MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE, THAT THE GOAL FOR SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESSES BE REMOVED. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0). Human/Pedestrian-scaled and public -transportation -oriented structures and infrastructure: MOTION MADE BY BOARD MEMBER MAXWELL, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER GLADSTONE, THAT HUMAN/PEDESTRIAN-SCALED AND PUBLIC -TRANSPORTATION - ORIENTED STRUCTURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE BE A GOAL FOR ALL OF EDMONDS. HUMAN SCALED STRUCTURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE INCLUDE WALKABILITY, HUMAN SCALED BUILDING HEIGHTS, GROUND -FLOOR PEDESTRIAN ENGAGEMENT, MIXED USE AND LIVE/WORK HOUSING CHOICES, AND MINIMIZING TRAFFIC, NOISE, WATER POLLUTION, AIR POLLUTION, AND NIGHTTIME LIGHT POLLUTION. Director McLaughlin explained that live/work can be problematic in areas where they want to promote ground level commercial or retail. It may not be appropriate in the core of downtown. Board members felt that all the centers and hubs should have the same standard as what is in downtown. THE MOTION WAS TABLED DUE TO LACK OF TIME. PLANNING BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None PLANNING BOARD CHAIR COMMENTS None ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:03 p.m. Planning Board Special Meeting Minutes July 24, 2024 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 9 7.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/11/2024 Preliminary Waterfront Vision Design Concept Staff Lead: Navyusha Pentakota Department: Planning & Development Prepared By: Navyusha Pentakota Background/History The Edmonds waterfront is one of the city's defining features, stretching more than a mile along the Puget Sound coast. This unique area contributes to the city's appeal and reflects its history and therefore is a key area of focus for planning and development. The 1995 Comprehensive Plan introduced a strategic approach for future development along the waterfront by establishing the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. This planning area, which has remained a key component of all subsequent Comprehensive Plans, identified many goals and policies for maintaining, enhancing, and better connecting the Downtown and Waterfront areas. One of those initial policies was to "[e]stablish a Point Edwards multimodal transportation center which provides convenient transportation connects for bus, ferry, rail, auto and bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal should be planned to reduce negative impacts to downtown Edmonds while providing the community with unique transportation resources and an economic stimulus for the larger community." Over the next decade, the Edmonds Crossing project took shape following extensive work by local, regional and federal partners with the intent to create that multimodal transportation hub at the south end of the waterfront area adjacent to the Point Edwards site. For a variety of reasons, the project was not realized, and now the Washington State Ferries' long-range plan no longer recognizes Edmonds Crossing and all previously dedicated funding for the project has been reallocated. The project's effective cancellation greatly impacts future land use within the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center, the restoration and enhancement of Edmonds Marsh, and transportation planning. As a result, the City needed to untangle Edmonds Crossing from the Comprehensive Plan during this periodic update and refine the approach to future development in the waterfront area. To that end, a Waterfront Issues Study was conducted in 2022 as an initial step to identify needs and opportunities for the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update (Attachment 1). MAKERS architecture and urban design, with Leland Consulting and The Watershed Company, conducted a comprehensive review of existing plans and studies, engaged in discussions with City staff, led an online open house and webinar, and interviewed stakeholder groups to understand the waterfront's current context, issues, and opportunities. The study's recommendations, which were presented to City Council, highlighted the need to create a new vision for the waterfront. It emphasizes that as part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, the City should engage the public in crafting an updated vision for the Downtown/Waterfront area. This vision should reflect the community's desires concerning land use and appeal while considering market realities and trends. Special attention should be given to the future use Packet Pg. 10 7.A of the Unocal Property and planning for sea level rise. Staff Recommendation No action is required. Staff will provide an overview of the preliminary design concept (Attachment 2) and requests the Board's initial feedback to guide additional work on the project. Narrative In response to the Waterfront Study and Council recommendations, the City initiated a high-level review of the planning area to assess the implications for the 2024-2044 Comprehensive Plan update. This review considered major properties, infrastructure, and environmental factors within the study area. Key recommendations from the 2022 Waterfront Study include: Creating a new vision for the waterfront. Recognizing and supporting the ferry terminal's current location. Prioritizing the restoration of Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek. Planning for improved emergency management of the waterfront. Similar to Edmonds Crossing, the status of several other ongoing projects has shifted over the years (cleanup of the Unocal property, bulkhead restoration, BNSF and Sound Transit's long-range planning, Marina Beach Park improvements), which could influence the future development in the area. In 2024, City staff reached out to the public to gather opinions on the Waterfront Study recommendations, seeking to understand which aspects still resonate with the community and remain relevant in today's context. A design charette was conducted, during which community members were asked specific questions about the waterfront goals outlined in the existing Comprehensive Plan. Discussions centered around which ideas should be carried forward and which might need to be rethought. During this session, the public participated in group design exercises facilitated by staff members, where they shared ideas and concerns on three main topics: future -forward urban design, marsh integration, and emergency access planning. It was a fun and interactive session where participants explored questions such as: "What do you envision the 'vibe' of the Waterfront area to be?" "What activities should be available?" "How should we connect the Waterfront to Downtown via Main St. and Dayton?" "How should parking be managed?" "How can we integrate the Marsh into the larger pedestrian network?" "How can we meet the needs of emergency services?" A summary of the design charette, highlighting key themes, was used to develop a preliminary concept for the waterfront area. Staff and consultants applied their expertise to translate the community's ideas into a graphic concept, which was presented back to the community in June 2024 for feedback. The concept was largely well -received, though concerns were raised regarding the hotel proposal, parking, and salmon restoration. All community responses can be reviewed here on City's web page - https://www.edmondswa.gov/cros/One.aspx?portalld=16495016&pageld=20153021. Revisions were made to the draft concept based on the feedback. Following additional feedback from the Planning Board and other local stakeholders, a set of goals and policies that support the implementation of the concept will be incorporate into the updated Comprehensive Plan, guiding future development and regulation in the waterfront area. Attachments: Packet Pg. 11 7.A Attachment 1 - Edmonds Waterfront Study Key Findings and Recommendations Attachment 2 - Waterfront Preliminary Concept Packet Pg. 12 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Study Key Findings and Recommendations Memo July 14, 2022 Executive Summary The purpose of this project was to identify strategic updates and high-level recommendations to be considered in the 2024 Edmonds Comprehensive Plan update to reflect new information about waterfront uses, needs, and issues. The Edmonds Crossing project, which proposed to relocate the Edmonds ferry terminal to the south end of the waterfront, is not recognized in the Washington State Ferries 2040 Long Range Plan and the Washington State Department of Transportation has made no recent efforts to advance it. The City's long-range planning efforts have been relying upon the Edmonds Crossing project for decades; the Comprehensive Plan currently includes 30 references and eight pages devoted to the project. o soo 1,000 Feet Figure 7 - Overview of keyproperties and projects in the Edmonds waterfront study area (MAKERS) The Edmonds Crossing project's effective cancellation also impacts future ownership and uses of key properties, restoration and enhancement of the Edmonds Marsh, transportation planning, and several other infrastructure and planning issues. shows the general relationship between key sites, features, and projects in the waterfront study area. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 1 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 13 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo This Waterfront Issues Project is intended to be the initial step in identifying needs and opportunities to incorporate into the Comprehensive Plan for the 2024 update. MAKERS architecture and urban design, with the help of Leland Consulting and The Watershed Company, conducted a thorough review of existing plans and studies, held numerous conversations with City staff, led an online open house/webinar with 37 participants, and interviewed nine stakeholder groups to gain a better understanding of the waterfront's current context, issues, and opportunities. The findings are organized by sections 1-11 pertaining to each issue or project. Based on the project team's findings and discussions, the top preliminary recommendations in this memo include: Create a new vision for the waterfront (Recommendation 11.A). Addressing the effective cancellation of Edmonds Crossing is not as simple as deleting its name from the Comprehensive Plan, because the plan heavily relies upon the project for land use assumptions and resolving the at -grade railroad crossing conflicts. As part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, the City should engage the public to craft an updated vision for the Downtown Waterfront area. The vision should clearly articulate the community's desires around land use and character within the framework of market realities and trends. The future use of the Unocal Property and planning for sea level rise should be special considerations in the visioning. See related Recommendations 13, 2.A, 5.A, and 3.C. Recognize and support the Edmonds ferry terminal's current location (Recommendation 2.A). Develop new and more specific land use and transportation policies that recognize the existing ferry terminal and guide the City's approach to planning around the terminal. Prioritize Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration (Recommendation 4.A-B). Continue planning and funding of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project, including refined cost estimates, design, and flood mitigation planning. If the Unocal Property is acquired by the City, update the design of Willow Creek to optimize ecological outcomes. Plan for improved emergency management of the waterfront (Recommendation 7.C). Street closures due to train crossings are a continued problem, and emergency service west of the tracks remains at risk of disruption. In coordination with other jurisdictions, this issue requires further study and possible improvements involving capital facilities investments or new transportation infrastructure. Emergency management planning must be conducted collaboratively with organizations such as the Port of Edmonds, BNSF Railway, Washington State Ferries, Snohomish County, and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. Several technical studies are recommended to support comprehensive planning and economic development. Refer to the recommendation number to find information on each study. Study Recommendation Number Ferry traffic study 2.13 Unocal Property real estate appraisal 3.A Federal Railroad Administration quiet zone application 6.13 Hotel feasibility study 11.13 Comprehensive parking study of the Downtown Waterfront area 11.H Figure 2 - List of recommended studies City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 2 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 14 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Introduction Project Purpose The Edmonds Crossing project, which proposed to relocate the Edmonds ferry terminal to the south end of the waterfront, is no longer active. The City's long-range planning efforts have been relying upon the Edmonds Crossing project for decades. This change affects future ownership and uses of key properties; it also relates to restoration and enhancement of the Edmonds Marsh. The City undertook this project as a first step in examining the implications of this change at a fairly high level for the purpose of updating the Comprehensive Plan for the 2024-2044 planning period. This project also considered other major properties, infrastructure, and environmental elements in the study area. Memo Overview This memo contains the key findings, relevant Comprehensive Plan Policies, and preliminary recommendations for the 11 waterfront issues studied: Section 1 -The status of Edmonds Crossing.........................................................................................4 Section 2 - Ferry operations on the Edmonds -Kingston route.....................................................12 Section 3 - Unocal Property cleanup, property rights, and future land use ............................15 Section 4 - Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration efforts.............................................19 Section 5 - Flooding and sea level rise potential impacts..............................................................24 Section 6 - Railroad double -tracking project impacts and planning considerations ........... 28 Section 7 - Waterfront emergency access next steps......................................................................30 Section 8 - Edmonds Station access and improvements...............................................................35 Section 9 - Bus service improvements and light rail connections..............................................36 Section 10 - Port of Edmonds projects and properties...................................................................39 Section 11 - Land use and economic development opportunities............................................40 Section12 - Sources.....................................................................................................................................47 The key findings and facts in this memo were developed from the project's background research and public outreach efforts. Many of the facts are pulled from existing public documents and studies and from stakeholder interviews conducted with property owners, transportation agencies, and environmental interests. Stakeholders interviewed were the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Washington State Ferries (WSF), Sound Transit, Community Transit, BNSF Railway, Port of Edmonds, Tulalip Tribes, Save Our Marsh, JSH Properties, and Lund Consulting representing Chevron/Unocal. Following each set of findings, the consultant team's recommendations to address the major issues are listed. Most recommendations relate to updating the Comprehensive Plan, while some recommendations are for City -led actions and studies. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 3 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo-22-0714 Packet Pg. 15 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 1 - Edmonds Crossing Key Findings The Edmonds Crossing project originated in the 1990s when Washington State Ferries (WSF) proposed a vehicle loading bridge over the Main Street railroad crossing. The City objected to that design, and a concept for a new ferry terminal on the south part of the waterfront was developed as an alternative. It would be located on the Unocal Property adjacent to the Edmonds Marsh (see Section 3) and on land occupied by the Port of Edmonds and Marina Beach Park. Conceptually, major elements of the Edmonds Crossing project would consist of a three -slip ferry dock, large vehicle holding areas, surface and structured parking, a new/relocated Edmonds Station and bus transit center, pedestrian access across the railroad tracks, daylighting of Willow Creek, and stormwater treatment. The project's most advanced milestone was a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) published in 2004. a 000 00 • uacu w. �aez— poa�.�owm a Figure 3 - Edmonds Crossing 'preferred alternative " from the 2004 FEIS Today, the Edmonds Crossing project, as originally envisioned and planned for, is effectively cancelled with no signs of life. This is evidenced by: • Edmonds Crossing has had no major plans, designs, cost estimates, or other project documentation published since the HIS was released nearly 20 years ago • The Edmonds Crossing project is not included in the WSF 2040 Long Range Plan (published 2019) • WSDOT has no staff assigned to work on the project • WSDOT has no funding for the project, nor did the Legislature include the project in its major 2022-2038 transportation funding package (known as Move Ahead Washington) City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 4 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 16 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo • WSDOT has not identified any further transportation need for the Unocal Property beyond the agency's original intent to use the property for Edmonds Crossing, and the Legislature's official stance is that the City of Edmonds should be able to purchase the Unocal Property for the purpose of rehabilitating near -shore habitat for salmon (read more in Section 3) The WSF Long Range Plan says, "Edmonds multimodal terminal improvements are proposed in the long term." WSF staff have confirmed these improvements are undefined, they do not include the Edmonds Crossing project, and no alternative terminal relocation schemes are planned. The scope of the "multimodal terminal improvements" will be determined later in a community planning process. City staff report that ferry traffic issues associated with the existing terminal remain unresolved. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Excerpts, Policies and Recommendations Addressing the effective cancellation of Edmonds Crossing is not a simple task. The Land Use Element heavily relies upon the project for assumptions and planned actions in the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center, and it has no policies on the existing ferry terminal. Therefore, each recommendation of Section 1 carefully considers how Edmonds Crossing should be unwrapped from the Comprehensive Plan. Unlike the other sections of this memo, here each relevant Comprehensive Plan passage is listed and immediately followed by an associated recommendation. Some passages are abbreviated for brevity, and the full Comprehensive Plan should be referred to for complete context. See Section 2 on Ferry Service for related recommendations. Land Use Element Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Plan Context (page 44): A number ofpublic plans and projects have been taking shape in recent years, and these could have a profound impact on the future of the city's downtown/waterfront area. Some of these ongoing activities include... • Transportation planning to accommodate ferry traffic, including options for a reservation system, additional parking for ferry users, and the possible Edmonds Crossing multimodal project. The latter project would move the existing ferry terminal at the base ofMain Street to a ne w multimodal transportation center at Pt. Edwards. Recommendation 1.A. Update the bullet point to reference the existing Edmonds ferry terminal and remove reference to Edmonds Crossing. Considering adding a reference to WSF's future undefined multimodal terminal improvements at the existing ferry terminal, potential changes to holding lanes, and the planned three -boat service (see Section 2 for additional ferry information and recommendations). Downtown/Waterfront Vision (page 44). Taken together, the goals and policies for the Do wn to wn/Wa terfron t A ctivity Cen ter presen t a vision for Edmondsdowntown/waterfront. By actively pursuing the ferry terminal's relocation, the City has set upon an ambitious and exciting course. It is a course that holds promise for the downtown/waterfront, but it is one that will require concerted action by the entire community, including local, state and federal public officials, business groups and citizens. While the challenges presented in this effort are substantial, the possible rewards are e ven greater, for with its existing physical assets, future opportunities and the energy of its citizens, Edmonds has the potential to create one of the region's most attractive and vital city centers in the midst ofa magnificent shoreline setting. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 5 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 17 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 1.B. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference and update this Downtown Waterfront vision in a community engagement process as part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update. Since the Edmonds Crossing project is inactive, the updated vision should clearly articulate the community's desires for the area and reorient the community's desires for how the existing ferry terminal is integrated into the Downtown Waterfront. For further guidance on updating the vision, please see related Recommendations 3.C. and 11.A. Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center (page 45). Components of the overall vision for the downtown/waterfront area Include. - The Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation centerprovides convenient transportation connections for bus, ferry, rail, auto and bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal reduces negative impacts to downtown Edmonds while still providing a link between the terminal and downtown Edmonds The project provides the community with varied transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community. Downtown is extended westward and connected to the shoreline by positive mixed -use development as well as by convenient pedestrian routes Redevelopment of the holding lanes and SR-104 is pursued after the ferry terminal relocates to Point Edwards. Recommendation 1.C. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference and update the Downtown Waterfront vision per Recommendation 1.13. The update should consider that "negative impacts to downtown Edmonds" are currently undefined and possibly unresolved by the continuation of ferry operations in the current configuration. See also Recommendation 2.13 for a ferry traffic study Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Goal B (page 46). B.1 Future development along the waterfront should support the continuation and compatible design ofthree regional facilities.• Edmonds Crossing at Pt. Edwards; the Port of Edmonds; and the regional parks, beaches and walkways making up the public shoreline. Recommendation 1.11). Replace the Edmonds Crossing reference with the existing Edmonds ferry terminal. Clearly define what "compatible design" means for the existing terminal or remove that from the goal. See also Recommendation 2.13 for a ferry traffic study. Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Goal C (page 47). Continue to plan for and implement the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center at Point Edwards - pursuing the design, permitting, land acquisition and development of the project, as resources allow. The completion of Edmonds Crossing will help address the competing needs of three regional facilities (transportation, parks and open space - including the Edmonds Marsh, and the Port of Edmonds) while providing opportunities for redevelopment and linkage between downtown Edmonds and its waterfront. C.1 Utilize the Point Edwards site to its best community and regional potential by developing a multimodal transit center with compatible development in the surrounding area. In addition to the regional benefits arising from its multimodal transportation function, an essential community benefit is in removing intrusive ferry traffic from the core area which serves to visually and physically separate downtown from the waterfront. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 6 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 18 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo C.2 When feasible, establish a Point Edwards multimodal transportation center which provides convenient transportation connections forbus, ferry, rail, auto, pedestrians and bicycle riders and makes Edmonds an integrated node in the regional transportation system. The new terminal should be planned to reduce negative impacts to downtown Edmonds - such as grade separation/safety concerns and conflicts with other regional facilities - while providing the community with unique transportation resources and an economic stimulus to the larger community. C.3 Extend Downtown westward and connect it to the shoreline by encouraging mixed -use development andpedestrian-orientedamenitiesand streetscapeimprovements, particularly along Dayton and Main Streets. Development in this area should draw on historical design elements found in the historic center of Edmonds to ensure an architectural tie throughout the Downtown Area. Pursue redevelopment of5R-104 and the existing holding lanes once the ferry terminal moves to Point Edwards. C 4 Impro ve traffic conditions by remo ving ferry traffic impacts from the do wntown core. Recommendation 1.E. Revise goal C and subgoals C.1, C2., and C.4 to acknowledge the continued existence of the ferry terminal in its current location. The issues of Downtown ferry traffic, the railroad crossings, and multimodal transportation are addressed in other recommendations (respectively, see Sections 2, 6-7, and 8-9). Most of subgoal C.3 could potentially be retained as a higher -level Downtown/Waterfront Area goal since it does not necessarily rely upon Edmonds Crossing to be achieved. An updated Downtown Waterfront vision is needed per Recommendations 1.13, 3.C, and 11.A. To replace subgoal CA, the updated visioning process should evaluate the extent of ferry traffic impacts on the downtown core and be addressed by the vision (see Recommendation 2.13 regarding a ferry traffic study). Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Goal H (page 49). H. I Improve and encourage economic development opportunities by providing space for local businesses and cottage industries and undertaking supporting public improvement projects. Ofparticular significance is the enhancement of economic development opportunities resulting from the Edmonds Crossing project and the enhancement of Edmonds as an arts and water -oriented destination. Recommendation 1.F. Update this goal to explain how the "enhancement of Edmonds as an arts and water -oriented destination" will occur with the existing ferry terminal in place. Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center Multi -modal Transportation (page 49). Primarygoals of the City's Downtown Waterfront Plan include integrating the downtown core with the waterfront, improving pedestrian access and traffic circulation, and encouraging mixed -use development. Current conditions limit the city' ability to achieve these plan goals by making it difficult to move between the two areas, thereby minimizing the value of the shoreline as a public resource and amenity while adversely affecting the potential for redevelopment, including greater public use. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 7 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 19 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo P U G L I - ` S 0 U N 0 \ concur. Pi" v,n of e,i.uny eockm•• .rry vap „ t,namo Party Isootnl INOM) PaC,slrian O Connaction•� � Comnln.. Figure 15:Integration of the Remaining Ferry Pier Structure into Surrounding Parks (page 49). Recommendation 1.G. Update the Multi -modal Transportation section to acknowledge the existing ferry terminal and update the Downtown Waterfront Vision. See related Recommendations 2.A, 11.A, and 11.G. Consider removing Figure 15 since there are no active plans to alter the ferry terminal or pier structures. Edmonds Crossing subsection (pages 49-55). The full text of these pages is not shown for brevity. Recommendation 1.H. Remove the multi -page Edmonds Crossing subsection. Relocate some of the text from pages 49-55 which remains relevant, as follows. 2015 Alternatives Analysis (page 52) The project remains the City's stated preference to resolve the many conflicts created by the at -grade railroad crossings at Dayton and Main Streets. Recommendation 1.1. In the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element and in the Transportation Element, integrate a new preference to resolve the at -grade railroad crossing conflicts. See Sections 6 and 7 for further information and recommendations. Also, update the Downtown Waterfront vision per Recommendations 1.13 and 1 I.A. Short Term Actions (page 53). 3. Improve the existing downtown rail station ,between Dayton and Main Streets in order to better accommodate inter -city passenger and commuter rail service, including pro visions for bus and commuter traffic as well as pedestrian connections to the waterfront and downtown. During the short term planning period, evaluate the feasibility and benefits ofretaining a commuter rail and transit presence downtown after the construction of Edmonds Crossing. Recommendation 1.J. In the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element and in the Transportation Element, relocate Short Term Action #3 and integrate the known Edmonds Station access improvements that are planned by Sound Transit (see Section 8). Also update Short Term Action #3 to include bus transit connections to light rail stations (see Recommendation 9.13). City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 8 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 20 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Short Term Actions (page 53) 4. Plan for future joint public/private development of the area .between SR-104 and the railroad tracks. Planning activities could potentially include infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, development incentives and guidelines or modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or master planning). Although Amtrak and commuter rad service will be included as a part of the Edmonds Crossing project, the Cityand transitservice providers should examine whether a commuter rail stop can be retained between Dayton and Main Streets in order to provide improved service and stimulate potential redevelopment of the surrounding area. Recommendation 1.K. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference. As part of the Downtown Waterfront vision update (see Recommendations 1.13 and 11.A), the community's desires for the area between SR-104 and the railroad tracks should be determined and if a joint public/private development of this area is still relevant. See Section 3 for information and recommendations for the Unocal Property, and Section 11 for details on the current zoning and status of major properties like Harbor Square and Salish Crossing. See Recommendation 11.H regarding a parking study. Short Term Actions (page 53) S. Upgrade secondary do wntown streets for pedestrians. Implement the city's public urban design plan and street tree plan while expanding public amenities and streetscape impro vements in areas where these do not already exist. These improvements are particularly needed along Main and Dayton Streets in the area between downtown and the waterfront in order to improve pedestrian connections between downtown and the waterfront area. Pedestrian improvements should be combined with traffic improvement projects where applicable. 6. Continue to promote sustainable shoreline management and public access to the city's beaches, parks, and walkways. 7. Continue implementing a continuous shoreline walkway (boardwalk/esplanade) from Bracketts Landing North to Point Edwards. Work with the Port of Edmonds to integrate recreation and marina functions into the long term plan. 9. Encourage a variety of housing to be developed as part of new development and redevelopment of downtown properties. Housing should be provided to serve a diverse community, including single family homes, multi family apartments and condominiums, housing as part of mixed use developments, and housing connected with live/work developments that could also encourage an arts -oriented community in the downtown area. A special focus forarts-supportinglive/work arrangements could be in the corridor and nearby residential areas linking downtown with the Edmonds Center for the Arts. 71. Develop 'gateways"at key entrances to the downtown area which enhance the identity and sense ofplace for downtown. Gateways should signal that visitors are entering downtown Edmonds, and should include elements such as public art, landscaping, signage and directional ("way -finding') aids. Recommendation 11. The above short term actions are relevant without the Edmonds Crossing project and could be integrated elsewhere in the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element, the Housing Element, and the Community Culture & Urban Design Element. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 9 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 21 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Long Term Actions (page 54) 3. Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port development. 4. Continue to protect and enhance existing wetlands and continue to develop supporting non - intrusive interpretive trails and exhibits to help educate local citizens and visitors about Edmonds' unique ecosystems and natural and cultural history. 5. Continue development ofa 'necklace"ofshoreline parks with improvements, focusing on missing links in the park and walkwaysystem. Retain and expand existing parks, providing linkages whenever property acquisitions or easements become available for public use. 6. Encourage the development of centralized parking facilities as part of redevelopment projects. Under the right circumstances, these types of facilities can provide an efficient mechanism for consolidating expensive parking improvements while freeing up land formore intensive and desirable uses that support local housing, commercial, and pedestrian activities Public/private partnerships should be explored when the opportunity arises, both in private and public projects (e.g. the commuter rail station downtown). Centralized parking facilities could be builtas part ofa master planned mixed -use development. 8. Redevelop the area from the east side ofSR-104 to the railroad tracks, from Harbor Square to Main Street, according to a mixed use master plan. This area could pro vide a significant opportunity for public/private partnerships. Under the right circumstances, consolidated parking or a pedestrian/bicycle crossing to the waterfront could be possible as part ofa redevelopment project. Every opportunity should betaken to improve the pedestrian streetscape in this area in order to encourage pedestrian activity and linkages between downtown and the waterfront. Uses developed along public streets should support pedestrian and bicycle activity and include amenities such as street trees, street furniture, flowers and mini parks. Main and Dayton Streets should receive special attention forpublic art or art integrated into private developments to reinforce the visual arts theme for downtown. Redevelopment of this area should also take advantage ofthe ability to reconfigure and remove the ferry holding lanes paralleling SR-104 once the Edmonds Crossing project is developed. 70. New development and redevelopment in the downtown waterfront area should be designed to meet overall design objectives and the intent of the various 'districts"described for the downtown area. Recommendation 1.M. The above long term actions are relevant without the Edmonds Crossing project and could be integrated elsewhere in the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element and in the Transportation Element. An updated Downtown Waterfront vison, with community desires about development and redevelopment is need, per Recommendations 1.13, 1.K, and 1 I.A. See also Section 4 regarding wetlands and Edmonds Marsh, and Recommendations 11.G and 11.1-1 regarding the waterfront walkway and waterfront parking. Master Plan Development planning designation (page 57) The waterfront area south of Olympic Beach, including the Port of Edmonds and the Point Edwards and multi modal developments. This area is recognized by master plans for the Port of Edmonds, Point Edwards, and the Edmonds Crossing project as described in an FE15issued on November 70, 2004. These areas are also developed consistent with the City' Shoreline Master Program, as it applies. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 10 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 22 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 1.N. Update this this description of the Master Plan Development designation based on the outcome of recommended visioning process for the downtown waterfront and Unocal Property (see the recommendations in Section 3). Transportation Element Policy 6.9 (page 230) Locate and design a multi -modal transportation center and terminal to serve the city's needs with the following elements. • A ferry terminal that meets the operational requirements to accommodate forecast ridership demand and that provides proper separation of automobile, ,bicycle and walk-on passenger loading; • A train station thatmeets intercitypassenger service and commuter railloading requirements, and provides the requisite amenities such as waiting areas, storage and ,bicycle lockers; • A transit center with connections to major regional destinations; • A linkage between stations/terminals thatmeets the operational and safety requirements of each mode, including a link between the multi -modal station terminal to the business/commerce center in downtown Edmonds; • Safety features thatinclude better separation between train traffic and othermodes of travel, particularly vehicle and passenger ferry traffic as well as the general public,• and • Overall facility design that minimizes the impact to the natural en vironment, in particular the adjacent marshes. Recommendation 1.0. Edit this policy with the assumption that the City is recognizing and supporting the ferry terminal in its existing location. Incorporate or update policies elsewhere in the plan that refer to all of these objectives. See Recommendation 2.A regarding ferry facilities, Section 8 regarding train service, Section 9 regarding bus service, Section 7 regarding separation between train traffic and other modes of travel, and Section 4 regarding the Edmonds Marsh. Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Facility (page 299) The City is also a partner in the Edmonds Crossing multimodal ferry, bus, and rail facility. Sound Transit is planning to relocate Edmonds station as part of the larger Edmonds Crossing Multimodal project being led by WSDOT. While there is no funding for this relocation, the multimodal facility would be an important transit hub for the city. Recommendation 1.P. Remove the Edmonds Crossing subsection under the "transit" heading Acknowledge the existing ferry terminal through the Comprehensive Plan consistent with the other recommendations of Sections 1 and 2. Interjurisdictional Coordination (page 378) Coordinate with WSDOTand the FHWA to move forward with the Edmonds Crossing Multimodal Project. Recommendation 1.Q. Remove the Edmonds Crossing reference. Coordinate with WSDOT on other ferry terminal and traffic improvements per the recommendations of Section 2. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 11 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 23 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 2 - Ferry Service Key Findings The Edmonds Ferry Terminal is located at the end of Main Street. Vehicle and foot passenger traffic to and from ferries must cross over railroad tracks at the end of the terminal pier. During regular two -boat service, Edmonds/Kingston ferry route has 25 daily round trips running approximately every 45 minutes (depending on time of day). In 2021, the route carried approximately 3.5 million passengers, which included 1.9 million vehicles. This is up from 2020 but still 15% below pre -pandemic volumes. The route has recently operated with only a single vessel due to ongoing pandemic and crew shortage impacts. <<> > Everett • Clinton N Mukilteo Kingston Edmonds Bainbridge Island ;1:0 1 Bremerton �� Seattle SERVICE ENHANCEMENTS Route capacity increase O New vessel O Additional service hours = Increase passenger capacity TERMINAL ENHANCEMENTS Major preservation or improvement Electrification Figure 4 - Summary ofplanned lmprovements to the Edmonds/Kingston route (Washington State Ferries) The route currently uses vessels carrying up to 144 or 188 vehicles. Starting in the 2028-2041 timeframe, Washington State Ferries plans to add a third boat to the route for the purpose of increasing service frequency and capacity. All boats on the service would be the 144-vehicle vessels that can be loaded and unloaded more quickly to meet 30-minute headways. One of the two current service vessels, the Puyallup, is planned to be converted to electric -hybrid propulsion and operate all -electric in 2023. Washington State Ferries has not received any data or plans from BNSF on the double -tracking project and therefore has not performed an analysis of how changes in train traffic will affect ferry operations. In one 30-day period in 2015 Washington State Ferries tracked ten ferry delays (ranging from 3 to 15 minutes each) attributed to railroad crossing issues. See Sections 6 and 7 for further information and recommendations on the train crossings. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 12 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 24 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Figure 5 - Main Street where it crosses the railroad and connects to the ferry dock (MAKERS) A reservation system for the Edmonds -Kingston route was studied in 2010, and it was determined that all central Puget Sound ferry routes would need to switch to reservations at the same time for the system to be feasible. The Long Range Plan anticipates a further study of Edmonds terminal improvements and what physical changes would be needed to the vehicle holding lanes. The City of Edmonds 2021-2041 Capital Facilities Plan includes a $357,00 project to "Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users" by 2024. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Economic Development Element Policy A.8 Leverage business opportunities related to travelers to/from Edmonds using the Washington State Ferry system. Transportation Element Policy 6.8 Form a multimodal system that links ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non -motorized travel providing access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local commercial districts and residential neighborhoods. Recommendations See Section 1 on Edmonds Crossing for related recommendations. Recommendation 2.A. Develop new and more specific land use and transportation policies that recognize the existing ferry terminal and reinforce the City's support for the terminal's current location. Policies should explain the City's stance and strategy around ferry traffic and holding lane configuration, a potential vehicle reservation system, transit and walking/biking connections to the terminal, and the implications of future three -boat service. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 13 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 25 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 2.B. Adopt a new transportation policy that calls for a ferry traffic study to assess the impacts of ferry traffic on the Downtown Waterfront. It is currently unclear what, if any, impacts ferry traffic currently has since the SR-104 holding lanes appear to effectively segregate waiting vehicles from the local street network and deboarding traffic occurs for 5-10 minutes during peak times. This study is needed to support the update of the Downtown Waterfront vision (per Recommendations 1.13 and 11.A). When the City conducts the study, it should direct staff to focus on street intersections to determine if ferry traffic has any impacts on transit reliability, private property and business access, and the safety and accessibility of pedestrian and bicycle routes between the waterfront and the core business district. The study should also quantify the current number and duration of train crossing closures at Main Street and Dayton Street, with averages developed over several days/weeks and which also consider the peak freight holiday season (see also Section 7 and Recommendation 7.A). The study should be done in time to support the updated Downtown Waterfront vision (see Recommendation 1 1.A). If WSF begins planning for a vehicle reservation system or three -boat service during the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, the study could potentially incorporate the considerations of Recommendations 2.0 and 2.11D below. Recommendation 2.C. If WSF moves to implement a vehicle reservation system, collaborate on joint transportation planning to balance traffic improvements with the mitigation of potential community impacts, such as pedestrian safety, vehicle idling, air and water pollution, transit reliability, local business impacts, and local street access. Recommendation 2.11). If WSF moves to implement three -boat service on the Edmonds -Kingston route, the City should evaluate the community impacts and opportunities. In particular, collaboration with WSF is needed to determine whether an additional boat slip, employee parking, or other terminal expansion will be built and where the third boat will be moored overnight. The City should also consider if higher service frequency would necessitate or allow changes to the configuration of holding lanes and how this relates to the current holding lane project in the Capital Facilities Plan. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 14 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 26 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 3 - Unocal Property Key Findings The Unocal Property is a large irregularly shaped parcel (ID 27032600102400) on the south end of the waterfront. The parcel is 21.31 acres in size. In 2005, the State of Washington signed a purchase and sale agreement with Union Oil Company of California (Unocal), a subsidiary of Chevron, to purchase the Unocal Property in anticipation of the Edmonds Crossing project. Figure 6 - View of the Unocal Property (with approximate ,boundaries in yellow), cleanup operations, Willow Creek, and storm water pond. The Edmonds Marsh is at far left. (MAKERS) The property remains contaminated after the shutdown of a bulk fuel terminal in 1991. The Washington State Department of Ecology has been monitoring the cleanup of the site since that time Unocal is using a dual phase extraction system, which is a vacuum pumping technology that removes contaminated ground water, petroleum products, and hydrocarbon vapor from the subsurface. According to an email from the Department of Ecology, the extraction system was installed in December 2017. Under an Interim Action Work Plan, the extraction system is expected to run for six years (until December 2023). At that point, an assessment will determine whether the cleanup goals have been met. If so, an additional two years of "confirmation monitoring" will occur through the end of 2025 to show long term success. If the cleanup goals are not met, then contingency cleanup actions will be taken with an uncertain schedule. The Department of Ecology will soon publish a draft Cleanup Action Plan with more details on these processes, with the public invited to comment. Per the terms of the purchase and sale agreement, the State will be given title to the property once the Department of Ecology has deemed it to be sufficiently cleaned. The City of Edmonds and stakeholders have an interest in the property because it could play a key role in the restoration of Willow Creek and Edmonds Marsh. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 15 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 27 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo In 2021 the State Legislature approved a proviso that provides the City of Edmonds the right of first purchase at fair market value to acquire property rights for the site: During the 2027-2023 ,biennium, if the [state transportation] department takes possession of the property situated in the city of Edmonds for which a purchase agreement was executed between Unocal and the department in 2005 (Tax Parcel Number 262703-2-003-0009), and if the department confirms that the property is still no longer needed for transportation purposes, the department shall provide the city of Edmonds with the right of firstpurchase at fair market value in accordance with RCW 47.72.063(3) for the city's intended use of the property to rehabilitate near -shore habitat forsalmon and related species. The end of the 2021-2023 biennium is June 30, 2023. Based on the information above provided by the Department of Ecology, this right will expire before a determination can be made on whether cleanup goals have been met at the property. When WSDOT is given title to the property, they will conduct a public process and determine whether the agency has any further need for the property for a transportation purpose. At this time, WSDOT has not identified any such need beyond the agency's original intent to use the property for the now - inactive Edmonds Crossing project. If the property is deemed surplus, WSDOT will be required to receive fair market value for the property either monetarily or through a land exchange. The WSDOT Real Estate Office will work with stakeholders on how that compensation requirement is met. The Unocal Property has a land use designation of Master Planned Development. The site is zoned Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP2) under a contract rezone signed with Unocal in 2002. The contract rezone is accompanied by a master plan showing two land use alternatives: Alternative One includes the Edmonds Crossing multimodal transportation center and a limited area set aside for mixed -use development; Alternative Two acknowledges the unlikelihood of Edmonds Crossing moving forward, and therefore exclusively includes only mixed -use development. The master plan proposed specific zoning provisions that are still in place under Chapter 16.75 EMC, MP - Master Plan Hillside Mixed -Use Zone, such as permitted uses and dimensional requirements. EMC 16.75.020(D) stipulates that, "(1) No development shall be permitted in an MP1 or MP2 zone unless a master plan has been prepared...", and "(3) All property identified in the master plan shall be developed in a manner consistent with the provisions of the master plan." Therefore, if the Unocal Property retains the MP2 zoning and the property owner desires a different land use type or configuration than that envisioned in the 2002 master plan, a new master plan is required to be approved by the City as a comprehensive plan amendment, a planned residential development, or as a contract rezone. Under the terms of the original contract rezone, the City of Edmonds may initiate a property rezone at any time, or the property owner may amend or terminate the contract using the City's rezoning procedures. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Open Space Goal A. Open space must be seen as an essential element determining the character and quality of the Edmonds en vironment, in accordance with the following policies A.1. Undeveloped public property should be studied to determine its suitability and appropriate areas designed as open space. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 16 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 28 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo A.2. All feasible means should be used to preserve the following open spaces: A.2.a Lands which have unique scientific or educational value. A.2.b Areas which have an abundance of wildlife, particularly where there are linked wildlife corridors or habitats of rare or endangered species. A.2.c Natural andgreen beltareas adjacent to highways and arterials with the priority to highways classified as scenic. A.2.d Areas which ha ve steep slopes or are in major stream drainage ways, particularly those areas which have significance to Edmonds residents as watersheds ornatural drainage ways. A.2.f Bogs and wetlands. A.2.h Lands which would have unique suitability for future passive or active recreational use. Open Space Goal B. Edmonds possesses a most unique and valuable quality in its location on Puget Sound. The natural supply of prime recreational open space, particularly beaches and waterfront areas, must be accessible to the public, in accordance with the following policies: B.1 Edmonds saltwater shorelines and other waterfront areas should receive special consideration in all future acquisition and preservation programs. B.2 Where ver possible, provide public access to public bodies of water. Recommendations Recommendation 3.A. The City should retain an outside firm to perform a development feasibility assessment of the Unocal Property to determine its fair market value. The assessment should account for the site's accessibility, presence of critical areas and other ecological features, historic soil and water contamination, proximity to the railroad and other neighboring land uses, and other customary real estate considerations. After completion of the assessment, the City should budget appropriately for the expected fair market value. Recommendation 3.113. The City should exercise its right of first purchase at fair market value on the Unocal Property if it becomes available before June 2023. If this right expires before being exercised, the City should update its 2023 state legislative agenda to include an extension of the right into the 2023-2025 biennium or permanently. This is because the Unocal property cleanup will likely continue past the right's current expiration, and the property's transfer to WSDOT and subsequent availability for purchase has an uncertain schedule. Recommendation 3.C. As part of a cohesive Downtown Waterfront vision and 2024 Comprehensive Plan Update, conduct a public process that determines the community's desired future land use of the Unocal Property. While there is vocal support for the City to acquire the property for the purpose of ecological restoration and wildlife habitat preservation, and the Legislature's understanding of the City's intended use of the property is to rehabilitate near -shore habitat for salmon and related species, this has not been affirmed by official City policy. The current Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and site - specific master plan all assume and allow for the now -inactive Edmonds Crossing project and commercial and mixed -use development. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 17 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 29 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo The public process could take a variety of forms and should be integrated into the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update and aligned with the visioning for the Downtown Waterfront, consistent with Recommendations 1.13 and 11.A. This recommended public process is expected to result in a redesignating and rezoning of the Unocal Property for open space purposes. If this is the case, the following Recommendations 3.D-F also apply. Recommendation 3.11). See Recommendation 3.0 above to determine if this recommendation applies. Consider updating the Comprehensive Plan map to redesignate the Unocal Property from Master Planned Development to Open Space. As documented by the key findings, the Edmonds Crossing project as originally envisioned and planned for is no longer active and there are no alternative development proposals by the property owner. Therefore, the Unocal Property's designation for Master Plan Development is outdated and should be updated. The Open Space designation is appropriate if the City's vision for the property is for ecological restoration and wildlife habitat preservation. The City may adopt findings of fact that the designation change meets Open Space goals and policy because the Edmonds Marsh system and associated uplands property: • provides unique scientific and educational value; • has an abundance of wildlife; • is a scenic natural area adjacent to a highway; • provides major drainage way containing salmonid habitat with significance to Edmonds residents; • consists of wetlands and saltwater estuary; and • already includes passive recreation uses. Lastly, update the Comprehensive Plan's description of the Master Plan Development designation (see Recommendation 1.N). Recommendation 3.E. See Recommendation 3.0 above to determine if this recommendation applies. Consider a City -initiated rezoning of the Unocal Property from Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use (MP2) to Open Space (OS) and prepare a staff report for Planning Board recommendation and City Council approval. The OS zone is appropriate if the City's vision for the property is for ecological restoration and wildlife habitat preservation. The OS zone purpose includes: "To designate land ... for open space use or which contributes significantly to the open space inventory of the community"; and "To regulate the use of these lands ... which provide an identifiable link to the city's open space or critical areas inventory." Permitted uses in the OS zone include "conservation areas including forest and wildlife preserves" and "reclamation areas limited to soil, forest, wildlife or watershed." Recommendation 3.F. See Recommendation 3.0 above to determine if this recommendation applies. Prepare an ordinance for the aforementioned Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone to be adopted simultaneously. This could be integrated into the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update process. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 18 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 30 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 4 - Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek Restoration Key Findings The Edmonds Marsh is one of the few urban, tidally -influenced, saltwater estuaries remaining in the Puget Sound area. The marsh is hydrologically connected to Puget Sound through Willow Creek. Before settlement, the marsh was 40 acres and today it is approximately 22 acres. The marsh is publicly accessible on a half -mile of walkways and boardwalks and is popular with bird watchers due to the variety of observed species. Coho salmon and cutthroat trout have a documented presence, and a volunteer -run fish hatchery is located at the southeast area of the marsh. The marsh is classified as a category II wetland. Figure 7-Left.•Aerial view of Edmonds Marsh and environs athigh tide, looking north. Right: Boardwalk and wildlife viewing areas on the north side of Edmonds Marsh (MAKERS). Willow Creek was diverted into an underground pipe in 1962 during the construction of the Port of Edmonds marina, which has since limited fish access to the marsh. The creek currently empties into Puget Sound under Marina Beach Park. The main action needed to restore the Edmonds Marsh is daylighting Willow Creek and improving fish access forjuvenile Chinook and other fish species to migrate, rear, and forage in the marsh. The 2016 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan estimated a cost of $12 million for the "Daylighting Willow Creek, salmon habitat and stormwater management project." The 2019 Expanded Marsh Concept Design and Hydraulic Modeling study estimated this a cost of $13.6-16.6 million (this estimate does not include additional work outside the scope of that study). City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 19 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 31 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Dayton St. Outfall Willow Creek Outfall WSDOT Stormdrain . Outfall 11���s- Q"�O Creek /Intersection with Recurrent Flooding EDMONDS MARSH a" 5� dO � 7� DAYTON ST ❑❑ 1 Jo- tf i W oa PROJECT, O Sm CITYPARY;D Figure 8 - Edmonds Marsh and existing drainage network. The inset photo shows the Willow Creek culvert west of the railroad tracks (Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan). The 2016 Marina Beach Park Master Plan, and subsequent 30% design drawings for the redesigned park, have the creek daylit west of the railroad and emptying into the Puget Sound on the beach. Pedestrian bridges over the creek will discourage human and dog interaction with fish habitat. Reconstruction of the park is estimated to cost $5.6 million. LEGEND FROPOSEDFL000 PROTECTION STRUCTURE PROPOSED DAYLIGHT CONTOUR 0 MTLAND RESTORATION RIPARIAN BUFFER SNOHgASH COUNTY GIS PARCELS Figure 9 - Excerpt from October2079 City Council presentation illustrating daylight alignment alternative #6, channel with flood wall orberm "(City of Edmonds) City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 20 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 32 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo East of the railroad, the 2019 study determined that a sinuous channel with a low flow habitat channel, large woody debris, and wetland and riparian buffers will provide beneficial habitat forjuvenile salmon, meet fish -passage criteria, and provide instream and marsh connectivity habitat functions. This channel was illustrated roughly parallel to the railroad tracks (see Figure 9). Stakeholders have expressed interest in moving the creek further away from the railroad tracks than illustrated in conceptual designs. In August 2020, WSDOT communicated to Save Our Marsh that is has no concerns with routing Willow Creek in a new channel across the middle of the Unocal Property if public process, environmental considerations (particularly with regard to remaining contamination), and appropriate compensation lead to that conclusion. The 2019 study considers this possibility, saying: We understand that the City staff and City Council are interested in expanding the Daylight channel and riparian buffer footprint to the fullest extent possible. In this study, the Daylight Project footprint is constrained by the assumption that WSDOT Ferries will use the site for the future Edmonds Crossing... if the WSDOT Ferries site constraints are later removed, the Daylight Channel alignment can be modified in final design. The one caution with expanding the Daylight Channel is that costs will increase due to increases in exca vation, fi//, and potential treatment and disposal quantities, as the risks for encountering residual contamination on the site increase with any additional excavation. The 2019 study also found water and sediment quality issues in the marsh and recommends sediment contamination remediation, water quality monitoring, and fecal coliform source studies to restore and improve the marsh health and ecosystem functions. During this project, stakeholders suggested vehicle pollutant runoff from non -point sources across the study area are additional challenges to improving the Edmonds Marsh water quality and creating a safe salmon habitat. The critical area regulations (Chapter 23.50, Edmonds Community Development Code) provide that ecological restoration of the Edmonds Marsh is an eligible location for off -site compensatory mitigation for development projects. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy See other relevant policies under the Unocal Property section above. Community Sustainability Element Environmental Quality Goal A.1 Ensure that the city's natural vegetation, especially native vegetation, associated with its urban forests, wetlands, and other wildlife habitat areas are protected and enhanced for future generations. Environmental Quality Goal B.1 The City should promote and increase public awareness and pride in its natural areas and wildlife heritage. Special emphasis should be directed toward preserving natural areas and habitats (forests, wetlands, streams and beaches), especially those with native vegetation, that support a diversity of wildlife. Land Use Element Vegetation and Wildlife Goal A. The city should ensure that its woodlands, marshes and other areas containing natural vegetation are preserved... City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 21 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 33 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Vegetation and Wildlife Goal B. The city should promote and increase public awareness and pride in its wildlife heritage. Special emphasis should be directed toward preserving the natural habitats (woodlands, marshes, streams and beaches) of the city' wildlife in accordance with the following policies: B. 7 Establish and maintain a variety of educational and recreational programs and activities for all age levels. B.2 Erect and maintain educational displays that identify some of the more common plants and animals and their ecosystems and habitats, including at streams, beaches, and marshes. B.3 Prevent the unnecessary disturbance of native species and their respective habitats. 8.4 Encourage landscaping and site improvement on city -owned property which recognizes value of habitat in overall site design. Community Culture and Urban Design Element Community Culture Goal B. Encourage recreational opportunities. B. 7 Encourage public access to significant recreational areas and development ofpedestrian friendly connections between areas. 8.2 Significant recreational areas would include, but not be limited to: Puget Sound Shorelines, Lake Ballinger, Edmonds Marsh, Yost Park, Lund' Gulch, etc. 8.3 Compatible land uses should be made ofsurrounding areas. B.4 Promote public awareness and recognition of the value of these resources. Utilities Element Storm and Surface Water Management Goal B. To preserve, protect, and (where feasible) restore surface water resources to provide beneficial uses to humans, fish, and wildlife. 2016 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Goal 3: Shoreline Use and Access Action plan item 3.F- Develop and implementa masterplan to restore the hydrological and ecological connection ofMarina Beach Park to the Edmonds Marsh. Goal4: Natural Resource and Habitat Conservation Action plan item 4.1- Consider expanding the function and facilities around the Willow Creek Hatchery to create a more expansive interpretive center that includes the Edmonds Marsh. Recommendations See related recommendations under Section 3 and Section 5. Recommendation 4.A. Continue planning and funding of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project, including refined cost estimates, engineering, and flood mitigation planning. A collection of projects related to marsh restoration are listed in the Edmonds 2021-2041 Capital Facilities Plan. See also the recommendations regarding flooding and sea level rise in Section 5, and the need to coordinate with a possible Admiral Way overpass under Recommendation TE. Recommendation 4.13. If Edmonds acquires the Unocal Property (see Section 3), update the design options for Willow Creek restoration to fully consider the land, optimize ecological outcomes, and City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 22 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 34 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo further improve fish habitat. Key considerations include adjacent land uses and potential pollutants, the width of vegetated riparian zones, avoiding potential fish stranding in connected seasonal inundation areas, avoiding residual contamination from site soils, and minimizing additional cost. Recommendation 4.C. Continue coordinating with property owners and public agencies on pollutant control to minimize untreated runoff into Edmonds Marsh. This may include capital improvements, joint application for grant funding, or enhanced maintenance. For example, the Port of Edmonds manages stormwater quality management with catch basin cleaning and regular power vacuum sweeping of paved areas. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 23 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 35 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 5 - Natural Hazards and Critical Areas Key Findings Figure 10 - National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance Rate Map showing ,base flood level in Edmonds (Federal Emergency Management Agency) The Downtown Waterfront is subject to impacts from several types of natural hazards and critical areas. In Edmonds, sea level rise of 4 inches to 4 feet is expected over the next century, and the intensity of storm surges is expected to increase during this time. Nearly the entire Edmonds waterfront is within the 100-year floodplain. Flood maps were updated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency TEMA) in June 2020. Base flood elevation (BFE) is the elevation of surface water resulting from a flood that has a one percent chance of equaling or exceeding that level in any given year. The BFE on the Edmonds waterfront is 12 feet above sea level. During a major flood event at BFE, the inundation area would include all waterfront properties along Admiral Way and Railroad Avenue, the ferry terminal, the railroad tracks, Edmonds Station and the transit center, a portion of Edmonds Way/Highway 104, Harbor Square, and part of Salish Crossing. This indicates that a major flood event could pose a risk to human life, property, and the environment. Major flooding would also disrupt a multimodal transportation hub of regional significance. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 24 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 36 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo The 2019 Expanded Marsh Concept Design and Hydraulic Modeling study found that without flood mitigation, the Willow Creek daylighting project in combination with extreme king tides, storm surges, and future sea level rise may increase flooding along the railroad, Harbor Square, and State Route 104. Flood protection berms or floodwalls in these locations will be necessary to reduce flood risks compared to existing conditions. The 2019 study included these elements in the cost estimates, and further noted: We estimated costs forAlternative 6A (flood berms $13.60 and 6B (floodwalls $16.60. Flood berms may be feasible but may be more difficult to permit as the floodberms will have increased wetland impacts. Depending on wetland permitting regulations, Project funding sources, and BNSF Railway input, there may be Project regulatory and landowner drivers that could dictate which of these structures is feasible and acceptable, regardless of the Project costs. The Port of Edmonds bulkhead project considered sea level rise during project development. The bulkhead is only being raised six inches to accommodate a grade change. Analysis by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Port determined a taller bulkhead was not necessary because the bulkhead does not support any structures, nor would a taller (and therefore more costly) bulkhead prevent flooding beyond its extents. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 25 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 37 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo **I City of Edmonds Critical Areas 0 - Legend — Creeks Seismic Hazard Areas Wetlands ((, — PHSPublic Points SHT8N — PHSPublic Lines ,— �•• Q� E PHS Public Polygon Outlines / AS MAPPED Masketl h PHS Public Polygons AS MAPPED j�� w MAIN ST /.' ETR TWP r> Q m TOWNSHIP j" Land dide Hazard Area 4096 l ❑ Severe Erosion Hazard 159640% ❑ Erosion Hazard Areas 1556-40% �S.—Ions L� I Secti ons Boundary Edmond s eoun dairy v {� Arc SDE.GIS.STREET_CENTERLINE — all otnervelues �, EDMONDS ,i _ k �25 U [ _ TT R errata PnnclpalAnenal MlnnrAnarlallcalednr WOODWAY — PINEST F. I_ peal sveeC on Hamp 1:12,125 ol Notes 0 1,11111 2,0213 Feet 18,�56 1,504.7 pisaos.—,Ira pu pV,mb.an This ma tafstaticout tf—I, lntern9 ma t d', for reference only. Data layers that appear on thl s map may or may not be accurate, WGS_1984 Web_Mercator_Auxillary_Sphere re,E, herxisereliable. (1) City of Edmonds THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR DESIGN OR CONSTRUCTION Figure I I - Critical areas map generated by the City of Edmonds online Geographic Information System. The purple shading represents sensitive species habitat areas. A large portion of the planning area is within a seismic hazard zone, meaning that soil may liquefy and cause additional damage to buildings and infrastructure in the event of an earthquake. In the Puget Sound area, this type of risk is typically found in waterfront areas of fill where land has been artificially expanded. Data from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources further subclassifies the liquefaction hazard area shown on Figure 11, with the area west of the railroad having a high -risk susceptibility the area around the Edmonds Marsh and Harbor Square having a moderate -to -high susceptibility. The slope between the Edmonds Marsh/Unocal Property and the Point Edwards development is mapped as an erosion hazard. Much of the offshore marine waters and the Edmonds Marsh system are mapped as sensitive species habitat area. As noted in Section 4, the Edmonds Marsh is classified as a category II estuarine and coastal lagoon wetland. The critical area regulations (Chapter 23.50, Edmonds Community Development Code) provide that ecological restoration of the Edmonds Marsh is an eligible location for off -site compensatory mitigation for development projects. Information on the relationship between the marsh and land use is in Section 11. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 26 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 38 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Relevant Comprehensive Plan and Hazard Mitigation Plan Policy Community Sustainability Element Climate Change Goal C. Assess the risks and potentia/impacts on ,both citygovernment operations and on the larger Edmonds community due to climate change. The assessment of risk and potentia/responses - ,both in terms of mitigation and adaptation -should evaluate the full range ofissues, paying particular attention to those arising from the city's location on Puget Sound. Implementation Action: By2017, update the City's Hazard Mitigation Plan to reference emerging risks and hazards related to climate change, such as rising sea levels and ocean acidification. Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan, City of Edmonds Annex Table 6-7 Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix. ED-23. Sea level rise mitigation planning, including assessment ofrisk and strategies to address. Lead department Development Services, Public Works, Parks and Recreation. CostLow. Timeline.• Short term. Recommendations Recommendation S.A. Update the Comprehensive Plan with more specific policies that address the City's preparation for and response to future major flooding events and long-term sea level rise in the Downtown Waterfront area. Utilize the latest information on flood levels and sea level rise projections. Sea level rise should be factored into the updated Downtown Waterfront vision (see Recommendation I I .A). Recommendation S.B. Using the latest sea level rise projections and FEMA flood data, update the assessment of the physical, economic, and social impacts of long-term sea level rise in the Downtown Waterfront area and the necessary actions or projects to protect lives, public infrastructure, and private property. This may support an update to the 2015 Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan and City of Edmonds Annex. Communicate findings on sea level rise to the Edmonds community. Recommendation S.C. Continue planning for flood mitigation as an essential component of the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration project (see also Recommendation 4.A.). This includes refined cost estimating and determining the preferred location for flood berms and/or floodwalls that most effectively protect lives and property. The construction and operation of flood berms and floodwalls should seek to minimize environmental disturbances and takings of private property. Coordinate with BNSF Railway, the Port of Edmonds, and WSDOT on planning, design, and potential cost sharing. Additionally, adequate sizing of the stream crossing near the Puget Sound shoreline would improve hydrologic connections to the marsh and the flood water storage functions it naturally provides. Given the modeled increases in flood event frequency and magnitude, site improvements in floodplains should be scaled accordingly. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 27 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 39 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 6 - Railroad Double -Tracking Key Findings BNSF Railway owns and operates railroad tracks along the eastern shoreline of Puget Sound, and a single-track segment runs through the Edmonds waterfront. Spurred by the business and operations efficiency needs of freight service and the reliability of passenger service (operated by Sound Transit and Amtrak), BNSF plans to add a second track to this segment. The project is anticipated to begin construction in 2024. According to Sound Transit, a second passenger platform on the west side of Edmonds Station is not planned since passenger service is infrequent and unidirectional. The project will fill the 2-mile gap between other double -track segments roughly between Edmonds Street in the north to Point Wells in the south. The second track will be located 15 feet east of the current track within BNSF right-of-way. Some site work has already occurred to prepare for the project, including embankment work on the west edge of the Edmonds Marsh and stockpiling of ties. BNSF Railway owns the land at the two railroad street crossings in the waterfront area, located at Main Street and Dayton Street, and the City possesses easements for the street crossings. Legal research on case law and property documents determined there is no evidence that the City of Edmonds has acquired fee simple title to the underlying property. BNSF has not shared any project plans with the City. MAKERS conducted a preliminary analysis of physical impacts based on the minimum track clearances for railroads being 8 feet horizontal and 23.5 feet vertical. The analysis shows Railroad Avenue should not be affected by the project. At Edmonds Station the existing ADA wheelchair ramp (mini -high platform) will be removed and the passenger platform and stationhouse at Edmonds Station are likely to remain in place. 10, x c� �rJ Figure 72 - Visualization of second railroad track (MAKERS) — v Visualization of Second Railroad Track at the Edmonds Waterfront Legend Approximate center of existing track Estimated center of second track Estimated horizontal clear zone of second track City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 28 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 40 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo BNSF is not planning any major mitigation work associated with the project. Sound Transit plans to rebuild the wheelchair ramp and make refinements to the existing platform edge, and the agency believes BNSF may provide track protection/flagging during these platform improvements. Figure 13 - Left.• View looking north at Edmonds Station. The second track will remove most of the asphalt pa ving and require replacing the wheelchair ramp in the distance. Right.• This walkway, between the station and Main Street would also be removed by the second track construction. (MAKERS) Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Noise Pollution Goal A. A.3 It is the policy of the city to minimize noise created by the railroad. Recommendations See related recommendations under Sections 7 and 8. Recommendation 6.A. Create additional Comprehensive Plan policies in the Transportation Element that support mitigation of railroad traffic and crossing closures. Recommendation 6.B. Apply to the Federal Railroad Administration to establish a full quiet zone. Wayside horns are currently in place which still have sound impacts on surrounding land uses. A full quiet zone greatly reduces train horns sound impacts in exchange for upgrading the safety of at -grade crossings with additional gates, signals, and other measures. Local jurisdictions usually need to provide funding for the safety upgrades. Applying for a quiet zone requires the assistance of a specialized consultant. Recommendation 6.C. Coordinate with Sound Transit and BNSF to minimize construction impacts from the second track project and to expediate improvements to Edmonds Station that maintain passenger accessibility and capacity. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 29 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 41 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 7 - Waterfront Emergency Access Key Findings The waterfront and marina area west of the railroad have special emergency access considerations because the train tracks isolate it from the rest of Edmonds. On several occasions, train traffic has delayed ambulances or required first responders to cross through stopped trains on foot to treat/evacuate individuals needing care. In the period July 2010 to December 2015, emergency calls to locations west of the railroad track numbered 277 (including 72 advanced life support calls, 14 fires, and eight water rescues). This is an average of one call per week. Snohomish County Fire District No. 1 also receives 40-50 calls per year that requires accessing their emergency boat that is moored at the Edmonds Marina. Figure 74 -A freight train passing through the Dayton Street crossing (photo by Bill Anderson) Observed and projected train volumes vary widely (see Figure 15). Currently, approximately 40 trains of all kind pass travel through Edmonds daily. Various studies and plans estimate up to 80 trains per day in the future, with freight volumes being highly dependent on economic trends. A related factor is the average length of freight trains, which has been steadily increasing over time nationwide. The number and length of trains has implications for "gate down" time at the Dayton Street and Main Street crossings, which currently average about two minutes per train. In one 30-day period in 2015, Washington State Ferries tracked ten ferry delays ranging from three to 15 minutes, each attributed to railroad crossing issues. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 30 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 42 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Year Average Daily Trains Sources/Notes Observations 2008 48 Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan (2009) 2012 37 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study, page 18, citing 2012 City of Edmonds video recordings Note: This study found average gate down times of 1.33 hours daily and 2.16 minutes per train. 2012 40 Edmonds Resolution No. 1280 (2012) 2014 36-43 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study, pages 1 and 18 Projections/Forecasts 2028 80 Washington State 2010-2030 Freight Rail Plan (2009) 2035 82 PSRC Economic Evaluation of Regional Impacts for the Proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point (2014) Note: This projection includes 18 trains associated with the cancelled Gateway Pacific Terminal project. 2035 64 Washington State Rail Plan (2014) 2040 44-76 Washington State Rail Plan (2020), range of low/moderate/high growth scenarios Figure 15 - Observed and projected train volumes in Edmonds The 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study presented a near -term recommendation to implement an Edmonds Street Emergency Access Overpass, which was further studied in the January 2019 Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector Alternatives Analysis Report. The concept was a pedestrian -bike bridge that could also be used for emergency vehicle access and ferry loading during train blockages. The Connector project was in early design when, in June 2019, the Edmonds City Council voted to cancel the project due to public opposition to potential impacts to the waterfront's natural features. Reliable emergency access for the waterfront west of the railroad tracks remains unresolved. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Transportation Element Policy 5.6 Design streets to accommodate emergency service vehicles. Improve emergency service access to the waterfront, especially to west side of train tracks when there is a train crossing. Recommendations See related recommendations under Section 6. Recommendation 7.A. For planning purposes, assume 60-80 trains per day will pass through Edmonds by the end of the 2024-2044 planning period. To better understand current train traffic, perform the ferry traffic study described by Recommendation 2.13. Recommendation 7.113. Update the Comprehensive Plan transportation policy 5.6 to clarify that emergency service access to the waterfront includes considerations for both vehicular and non - vehicular access. Recommendation 7.C. Street closures due to train crossings are a continued problem, and emergency service in the waterfront area west of the railroad tracks remains at risk of disruption. Consider updating the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, Community Sustainability Element, City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 31 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 43 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo and Capital Facilities Plan with policies to support enhanced emergency management services in this area. Emergency considerations include fire and medical response, police response, boating and marine incidents, and natural disaster response (such as flooding). Further, the City should take such actions to implement the policies. Emergency management planning and investments must be conducted collaboratively with organizations such as the Port of Edmonds, BNSF Railway, Washington State Ferries, Snohomish County, and Snohomish County Fire District No. 1. Opportunities for capital facilities studies west of the tracks include a new staffed fire station or ambulance/paramedic facility, a staffed police kiosk or mini -precinct, and/or unstaffed storage of emergency response vehicles/equipment (which was considered in the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study). Transportation options that should be studied include a new pedestrian -only overpass (see Recommendation 7.D) and/or a new vehicular emergency vehicle roadway (see Recommendation 7.E). Recommendation 7.D. Update the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element and Capital Facilities Plan with policies to support planning, design, and funding of a pedestrian -only overpass across the railroad tracks. Further, the City should take such actions to implement the project. This is consistent with the "near -term" recommendation from the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study for a midblock pedestrian overpass, estimated to cost $6-8 million (not adjusted for inflation). To minimize costs and aesthetic impacts, the City should plan for the overpass to have a compact footprint with switchback stairs and elevators (no ramps or escalators) and clearances no greater than required by the railroad. There are several opportunities to site the overpass on public property, illustrated conceptually in Figure 16. Planning considerations include span length and subsequent cost, pedestrian safety, ease of use, staging areas for emergency responders, and changes to circulation systems (parking, transit center, sidewalks, etc.) depending on where structures are placed. Coordination with BNSF Railway will be needed to maintain railroad track clearances and manage construction. The project also will require agreements with any affected property owners. Figure 16 - Conceptual midblock pedestrian overpass locations illustrated in orange, generally on public property, between Dayton Street and Main Street (MAKERS) City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 32 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 44 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo 1 A T Figure 17- Concept fora midblockpedestrian overpass at Edmonds Station (2016Edmonds Waterfront Access Study) Recommendation 7.E. If vehicular emergency access remains desirable by the City and emergency response agencies, update the Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element and Capital Facilities Plan to support planning, design, and funding of an emergency vehicle roadway and overpass at the south end of the waterfront. Further, the City should take such actions to implement the project if it acquires the Unocal Property (see Section 3 for related recommendation). An "Admiral Way Overpass" was evaluated in the 2016 Edmonds Waterfront Access Study, receiving positive public feedback and scoring high for human and natural environment criteria, and was screened out after a second level evaluation. The estimated cost is $10 million for the overpass and $25-31 million for the full project (not adjusted for inflation). Cost assumptions could likely be updated around land acquisition needs, new parking, and hazardous material removal. The concept should be revisited because the route could utilize an existing roadway on the Unocal site, and it would not have the aesthetic or environmental concerns that were raised with the Edmonds Street Waterfront Connector. By hugging the base of the hillside below Point Edwards, the route is mostly out of public view, does not occupy a beach shoreline, and it would not be designed for ferry traffic. The route could be open for non -motorized use during non -emergency times, which would enhance pedestrian and bicycle access between the waterfront and residential areas south of Downtown. The design may need to be coordinated with the Edmonds Marsh and Willow Creek restoration (see Recommendations 4.A and 4.13). Close coordination with the Port of Edmonds will be necessary to minimize impacts to parking and marina operations. Coordination with BNSF Railway will be needed to maintain railroad track clearances, resolve any property issues, and manage construction. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 33 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 45 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Figure 78 - Conceptual route fora vehicular emergency access connection (MAKERS) City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 34 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 46 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo iection 8 - Edmonds Station Access Projects and Sound Transit Service Key Findings During regular service, the Sounder North commuter rail line operates eight daily trips from Everett to Seattle with an intermediate stop in Edmonds. Pre -pandemic, the route carried about 1,500 passengers daily. Service has been reduced to four daily trips during the pandemic. Inset Map Sq a� Qai op m � � y Edmonds h Station Q rya �dme � ssc J� W Dayton st 13 Dayton St Edmonds Station improvements recommended for further study 1. Washington State Ferries parking lot 2. Salish Crossing parking lot 4. Downtown pedestrian lighting improvements 8. Additional bus bays at Edmonds Station 10. Additional on -demand bicycle lockers 11. Wind and rain screening at Edmonds Station 12. Bus transfer timing improvements (not mapped) Figure 19 - Excerpt ofplanned access projects at Edmonds Station (Sound Transit, MAKERS) Sound Transit proposed several Edmonds Station access and mobility improvements in the Sound Transit 3 funding package, which voters approved in 2016. The value of the improvements is estimated at $25 million and includes parking improvements, pedestrian lighting, additional bus bays, bike lockers, and additional weather protection on the station platform. One of the parking improvement projects under consideration is reconfiguring or repainting the WSDOT parking lot on James Street so that it fits more parking spaces. Due to financial challenges, Sound Transit's mobility/access projects around Edmonds Station are delayed by about ten years, with completion expected in 2034 instead of 2024. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Downtown/Waterfront Area Short Term Actions 3. Improve the existing downtown rail station between Dayton and Main Streets in order to better accommodate inter -city passenger and commuter rail service, including provisions for bus and commuter traffic as well as pedestrian connections to the waterfront and downtown... Transportation Element Policy 6.8 Form a multimodal system that links ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non -motorized travel providing access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local commercial districts and residential neighborhoods. Recommendations Recommendation B.A. In the Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center section of the Land Use Element and in the Transportation Element, acknowledge the Edmonds Station access improvements that are planned by Sound Transit and support their implementation as soon as possible. See related Recommendation 6.C. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 35 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 47 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 9 - Bus Service Key Findings Community Transit operates four bus routes that stop at Edmonds Station. Three of the routes are local and one is an express service to Downtown Seattle. The agency is currently updating its Long Range Plan and network vision, with adoption targeted for late 2022. By 2024, the agency is planning a major service restructure in the area to leverage the new light rail stations opening at the nearby Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace transit centers. As part of the restructure, local bus service in Downtown Edmonds will increase 30-50% with most lines running every 15 minutes. Additional layover space is necessary to accommodate increased bus service but has not yet been located or designed (Sound Transit proposes new bus bays by the year 2034, see Section 8). Adjacent properties would be most desirable for this purpose and buses cannot be routed across the railroad tracks. The current local routes 116 and 130 connect people in Downtown Edmonds to the transit centers in Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace. City of Edmonds staff report community interest in improved bus service/speed for these connections. In 2022 Community Transit began construction on a bus rapid transit (BRT) route, known as the Swift Orange Line, running between Edmonds College to Lynnwood, Ash Way, and Mill Creek. The route will open by mid-2024 and connect to the Lynnwood light rail station. Community Transit anticipates a future extension of the Orange Line westward to the vicinity of Downtown Edmonds, possibly using 196th Street. Currently, the extension is conceptual and unfunded, and it requires a BRT-compliant terminal facility. Also, Community Transit's draft 2050 Long Range Plan includes a "transit emphasis corridor" along SR-104 between Downtown Edmonds and the Mountlake Terrace light rail station, with potential 15-minute service all day on weekdays. Legend Local Community Transit Routes Express Community Transit Routes Funded Swft Orange Line BRT (opening 2024) mllluulll Conceptual extenson of Swift Orange Line BRT (unofficial) mulllwuu Conceptual bus transit emphasis corridor ODowntown Edmonds 11411 Sound Transit light rail route and stations (opening 2024) eI ry Tes inai n, 00 Ferry Terminal � y�llllNII11��N1lIIIIIYIIIIIIIMIIIIIgII II �1iJ111H1�_ -_ I Edmonds Park & Rlde���o��� - C�Ilano l/ �/Z�/'/ //////,,/����//11IIH��\I\III I II I I I I II I III I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIII I Irk r 244th St Aurora Village Transit Center Swift BlueLine N 2 Oth St N O 101 115 130 98, K�n^ r n itv ^1Nrn Figure 20 -Edmonds transit map (Community Transit, MAKERS) z Lynnwood Transit Center 107 112 113 115 116 t MOUNTLA 228thstTERRACE 236th St mU, U T A I L I' Mountlake Terrace Transit Center SNOW., 112 119 130 410 KIN(- 511 512 513 Kina Countv Metro City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 36 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 48 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Figure 21- Edmonds Station ,bus transit center (MAKERS) Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal B. Continue to plan for and implement improvements in the downtown/waterfront area that resolve safety conflicts while encouraging multi -modal transportation and access to the waterfront. B.3 Provide a more efficient transportation system featuring improved ,bus service, pedestrian and ,bicycle routes, and adequate streets and parking areas. Transportation Element Policy 5.17 Encourage the provision ofa bus rapid transitsystem or other high -capacity frequent transit service along SR 704. Policy 6.8 Form a multimodal system that links ferry, rail, bus, auto, and non -motorized travel providing access to regional transportation systems while ensuring the quality, safety, and integrity of local commercial districts and residential neighborhoods. Recommendations Recommendation 9.A. Continue discussions with Community Transit and Sound Transit about the location and design of the additional bus bays that are planned at Edmonds Station. Consider a new policy in the Transportation Element that promotes that these new bus bays include a BRT-compliant terminal facility to facilitate future delivery of the Orange Line (e.g., see the transit design guidelines from the National Association of City Transportation Officials). Recommendation 9.13. Consider a new policy in the Transportation Element that promotes City actions to accelerate the delivery of the Swift Orange Line extension to Downtown Edmonds and/or frequent service to the Mountlake Terrace light rail station. The policy should support discussions with WSDOT about options for future bus service enhancements along SR-104 and SR-524. Avenues of City support could include, but are not limited to, City funding for planning and construction, joint grant applications, expedited right-of-way permitting/easements (e.g., for stations), transit spot improvements (e.g., bus lanes and signal priority), and proactive community discussions of preferred alignments. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 37 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 49 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 9.C. Continue coordinating with Community Transit generally on bus service revisions and transit facility planning to maximize multimodal connectivity, transit ridership, and pedestrian safety. of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Paqe 38 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 50 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 10 - Port of Edmonds Key Findings The Port of Edmonds owns and manages approximately 33 upland acres as well as a small boat harbor and marina, with space for 1,000 boats. A variety of services and marine -related businesses are located on the Port's properties. The Port is rebuilding part of the bulkhead at the marina, a project valued at $15-20 million. The project includes an improved walkway on the bulkhead and two new plazas, public restrooms, and landscaping. The bulkhead reconstruction is in the design phase with earliest estimated completion in 2025, depending on timing of permits. The Port's new administration building is in the permitting phase and estimated to be completed by 2024. After this current series of work, the Port of Edmonds does not have plans for major infrastructure or development work. Figure 22 - Port of Edmonds project sites (MAKERS) The Port recently considered building a parking structure at the corner of Admiral Way and Dayton Street. The current surface parking lot there has approximately 100 spaces for a mix of commuters and Port tenants. Due to the site's zoning (Commercial Waterfront with a 30 feet height limit), a parking structure could not be built large enough on the site to create a worthwhile increase in the current number of spaces, so the Port is not proceeding with the concept. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Downtown/Waterfront Area Long Term Actions. 3. Coordinate circulation and publicparking with Port development. Economic Development Element Economic Development Goal A.7 Continue to partner with business leaders, organizations and community members, such as the Port of Edmonds, Edmonds Chamber of Commerce, etc., to leverage business opportunities and to solicit and address feedback to enhance the business environment. Recommendations Recommendation 10.A. As they arise, continue coordinating infrastructure and development planning efforts with the Port of Edmonds. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 39 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 51 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 11 - Land Use and Economic Development Key Findings Land use and economic development considerations in the waterfront study area include several large properties. One such property is Harbor Square, a commercial site owned by the Port of Edmonds. The site is under a contract rezone dating from 1980 and updated in 1998. The site has several 1-2 story buildings containing a mix of commercial uses, including a hotel, athletic club, retail shops, medical clinics, professional offices, and associated parking lots. In 2012 the Port of Edmonds applied for an amendment to the Edmonds Comprehensive Plan to adopt a Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan with a vision for mixed -use development. The redevelopment plan intended to further the Port's statutory directive of "engaging in economic development programs" to benefit constituents of the Port District as well as the overall Edmonds community with an expanded tax base, increased downtown activity, and promotion of transit -oriented development. � A L L � _ L � IIIIIIIIIIIIU�II IIIIIJ.'�'sii � ®' s ■ �■ .T LEGEND venlcie access arb Parxmg II IIII aeae:i , or. mW sioreecros .ad "u. Resid 11 village ______. Primaryspeaesuian roue Mixed use aD GalewaY arcl,iledu2l element ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ AtVaz street—, sage Figure 23 -Left: Concept for the 2072 Harbor Square Redevelopment Plan (Port of Edmonds). Right A building at Harbor Square (MAKERS). A specific architectural design was not part of the Harbor Square amendment. The Edmonds Planning Board approved the Port's amendment with conditions, and the Edmonds City Council rejected the application due to public opposition to potentially taller buildings on the site and a desire to do a comprehensive review of the entire waterfront area. Today the Port considers Harbor Square to be economically stable and there are no other plans for major improvements or redevelopment. Another major property is the Salish Crossing commercial center. The center is fully leased, and the owner has no plans for major improvements or redevelopment. The non-profit Cascadia Art Museum, located at Salish Crossing, draws approximately 13,000 visitors per year. Harbor Square and Salish Crossing are located between SR-104 and the railroad tracks, which is the area subject to Land Use Element short term action #4 that calls for a joint public/private development and activities such as infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, and City of of EdmondsIDevelopment Services, Planning Division Page 40Services, Planning Division Page 40 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 52 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo development incentives and guidelines or modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or master planning). The Edmonds Waterfront Center, a two-story community facility owned by the non-profit Edmonds Senior Center, opened in July 2021. Along with hosting social, health, and recreation programs and a coffee shop, the venue is available to the public for events. The project also rebuilt a portion of the waterfront walkway. Figure 24 - Left: The Ebb Tide Condominiums (gray building) and the new Edmonds Waterfront Center. Right The Salish Crossing property and Edmonds Station (at far right). Images by MAKERS. There is an approximately 300-feet long gap in the recreational waterfront walkway that runs between Main Street and Dayton Street. The completion of this "missing link" has been delayed by litigation since at least 2017. The litigation is a result of disagreement between the Ebb Condominium homeowner association and the City of Edmonds about the use of an easement. Following a recommendation by City staff and the Citizens Economic Development Commission, in February 2021 the City Council amended the CW zone to allow hotels. The most likely prospect for a hotel in the study area is limited to adaptive reuse due to limited land availability and the CW zone height limit. Relevant Comprehensive Plan Policy Land Use Element Edmonds Crossing Short Term Actions (page 53) 4. Plan for future joint public/private development of the area between SR-704 and the railroad tracks. Planning activities could potentially include infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, development incentives andguidelines or modifications to land use regulations (such as zoning or master planning).. . Downtown/Waterfront Districts. In addition to the goals and policies for the downtown/waterfront area, the Comprehensive Plan Map depicts a number of districts in the downtown/waterfront area. These districts are described below. Downtown Mixed Commercial. To encourage a vibrant downtown, first floorspaces should be designed with adequate ceiling height to accommodate a range of retail and commercial uses., with commercial entries at street level. Buildings can be built to the property line. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development. The first floor of buildings must provide pedestrian weather protection along public sidewalks. Design guidelines should provide for pedestrian -scale design features, differentiating the lower, commercial floor from the upper floors of the building. The design of City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 41 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 53 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo interior commercial spaces must allow for flexible commercial space, so that individual business spaces can be provided with individual doorways and pedestrian access directly to the public sidewalk. When the rear of property adjoins a residentially -designated property, floor area that is located behind commercial street frontage may be appropriate for residential use. Where single family homes still exist in this area, de velopment regulations should allow for "live-work'arrangements where the house can accommodate both a business and a residence as principal uses. Downtown Mixed Residential. In this area, commercial uses would be allowed but not required (i.e. buildings could be entirely commercial or entirely residential, or anything in between). Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. Buildings facing the Dayton Street corridor should provide a pedestrian -friendly streetscape, providing pedestrian amenities and differentiating the ground floor from upper building levels. Downtown Mixed Residential. In this area, commercial uses would be allowed but not required (i.e. buildings could be entirely commercial or entirely residential, or anything in between). Height and design of buildings shall conform to the standards of the Downtown Mixed Commercial District. Buildings facing the Dayton Street corridor should provide a pedestrian-friendlystreetscape, providing pedestrian amenities and differentiating the ground floor from upper building levels. Downtown Master Plan. The properties between SR-104 and the railroad, including Harbor Square, the Edmonds Shopping Center (formerSafewaysite), and extending past the Commuter Rail parking area up to Main Street. This area is appropriate for design -driven master planned development which provides for a mix ofuses and takes advantage ofits strategic location between the waterfront and downtown. Any redevelopment in this area should be oriented to the street fronts, and provide pedestrian -friendly walking areas, especially along Dayton and Main Streets. Development design should also not ignore the railroad side of the properties, since this is an area that provides a 'first impression "of the city from railroad passengers and visitors to the waterfront. Artwork, landscaping, and modulated building design should be used throughout any redevelopment project. Shoreline Commercial. The waterfront, west of the railroad tracks between the public beaches and the Port (currentlyzoned CW). Consistent with the City' Shoreline Master Program, this area should allow a mix of public uses, supporting commercial uses, and water -oriented and water -dependent uses. Building heights shall be compatible with the goal of achieving pedestrian scale development while providing incentives to encourage public view corridors Roofand building forms should be an important consideration in design guidelines for this area, because of its high sensitivity and proximity to public open spaces. Redevelopment should result in singular, landmark buildings of high quality and sustainable design which take advantage of the visibility and natural environment of their location, and which contribute to the unique character of the waterfront. Pedestrian amenities and weather protection must be provided for buildings located along public walkways and street fronts. Downtown/Waterfront Area Goal A. A.4 Enhance shoreline features to include a full spectrum of recreational activities, park settings, natural features (such as the Edmonds Marsh), and marina facilities. Improve public access to the shoreline and link waterfront features by establishing a continuous esplanade along the shoreline. The esplanade will be constructed over time through public improvements and Shoreline Master Program requirements placed on private development. Downtown/Waterfront Area Short Term Actions 7. Continue implementing a continuous shoreline walkway (boardwalk/esplanade) from Brackett's Landing North to Point Edwards. Work with the Port of Edmonds to integrate recreation and marina functions into the long term plan. Economic Development Element Economic Development Goal B. Revitalize and enhance the city's business districts, balancing the needs for housing, commerce and employment development with neighborhood character, amenities and scale. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 42 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 54 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo B.4. Continue to foster and enhance the economic vitality of Downtown Edmonds, including retention and growth of existing businesses, attraction of new businesses, and promotion of appropriate in -fill redevelopment.. . B.6. Promote enhanced connectivity between the Edmonds Center of the Arts and the Downtown business community to maximize synergy and economic impacts. Economic Development Goal E. Expand and enhance the tourism sector to attract outside spending to help fuel the local economy. E.7. Support efforts to enhance the hospitality infrastructure, including potential for an increased number and/or wider range of lodging establishments Downtown... Community Culture and Urban Design Element Urban Design Goal B: Downtown/Waterfront Activity Center. Design objectives and standards should be carefully crafted for the Downtown/WaterfrontActivity Center to encourage its unique design characterand important place -making status within the city. B.9 Building Height. Create and preserve a human scale for downtown buildings. Building frontages along downtown streetscapes should be pedestrian in scale. Zoning Standards The table below summarizes key zones in the waterfront area. As noted in the recommendations below, the consultant team finds that the building height limits in most zones and the prohibition on residential use in the CW zone are a constraint to economic development on the Edmonds waterfront. Permitted Examples of Major Zones in the Residential Permitted Non - Waterfront Study Area Height Limit Density Limit Uses Residential Uses Commercial Waterfront 30 feet None None Marine -oriented (CW) service, retail, office, hotels General Commercial (CG) 35 feet None None Most non-residential with Harbor Square contract uses rezone Other Harbor Square contract rezone requirements include minimum 25 feet setbacks from streets and the marsh, required screening of service and storage areas, and requiring all development to receive Architectural Design Board approval. Community Business (BC) 25-30 feet* 3.0 FAR max. Single-family Retail, restaurants, and multifamily offices, services Downtown Mixed 30 feet None Single-family Retail, office, service, Commercial (BD2) and upper -story hotels multifamily Downtown Mixed 30 feet None Residential (BD4) Multi Family (RM-1.5) 25 feet 1,500 sq. ft. lot Single-family None area per unit and multifamily min. Multi Family (RM-2.4) 25-30 feet* 2,400 sq. ft. lot area per unit min. * Maximum height depends on roof design, see Title 16 EMC for details. Figure 25 - Summary of waterfront area zoning standards City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 43 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 55 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Historic Sites Sites on Edmonds Register of Historic Places Rezones Contract Rezones (contractual requirements apply) Single Family _ RS-6 Single Famlly, 6,000sq. ft. lots Multi Family RM-3 Multi Famfly, 3,000 sq. ft. of lot area per unit - RM-2.4 Multi Family, 2,400 sq. ft. of lot area per unit _ RM-1.5 Multi Family, 1,500 sq. ft. of lot area per unit Downtown Business BDt Downtown Retail Core BD2 Downtown Mixed Commercial BD3 Downtown Com,enlence Commercial BD4 Downtown Mixed Residential BD5 Downtown Arts Corridor ® OR Office -Residential Commercial - BC Community Business - CG General commercial Waterfront _ CW Commercial Waterfront ® MP1 Master Plan Hillside Mixed Use RE MP2 Master Pion Hil(side Mixed Use Other - P Public Use C j'j OS Open Space Marina 600 300 0 600 1,200 Fcct N W E S RM' e ? 4 dt. e Ter 01 D * D r R-1979-0 j{ I o D r' 3 CG o _ 4 h � o Ft T 2 RM-2. Edmonds ' Marsh D ti Y o rc p w� ty p RS-6 s °w x�u eq Figure 26 - Excerpt of Edmonds zoning map in the waterfrontarea (City ofEdmonds) Shoreline Management Standards The Edmonds Shoreline Master Program (SMP) provides standards for development and environmental protection along the shorelines of Puget Sound and the Edmonds Marsh. The shoreline jurisdiction generally extends 200 feet landward. Figure 27 shows shoreline designations. Figure 27 - South Edmonds Shoreline Master Program designations (City of Edmonds) City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 44 Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 56 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo In general, the shoreline designations impose stricter limitations on permitted uses than what is allowed by the underlying zoning. Some land uses have minimum shore setbacks that may exceed other setback requirements, such as minimum 50-60 feet shore setbacks for parking areas in some designations. The building height limits follow the standards of the underlying zoning. Notably, for the Edmonds Marsh, in the Urban Mixed Use IV designation the standards require a minimum 110-foot buffer and an additional 15-foot building setback beyond (Edmonds Community Development Code section 24.40.090). The buffer must be vegetated and maintained to protect ecological functions. The width of the required buffer impacts the future economic development potential of the Port of Edmonds' Harbor Square property. The code's footnote 18 allows for an alternative buffer width through a shoreline conditional use permit "if a site -specific scientific study determines that the default buffer is not necessary to protect and maintain the baseline functions of this wetland/tideland habitat and its other associated ecological functions from being adversely impacted by the proposed project." Recommendations The consultant team observes that the Edmonds Waterfront and Downtown are special places in Puget Sound. To be sure, there are other waterfront towns, but Edmonds stands out with its historic character, human -scaled development pattern, and walkable waterfront. These attributes appear to drive Edmonds' economic health (and economic development) in as much as people want to live, work, and visit in such a community. Recommendation 11.A. As part of the 2024 Comprehensive Plan update, conduct public engagement for the purpose of crafting an updated vision for the Downtown Waterfront area. The vision should clearly articulate the community's desires for the type and intensity of desired land uses for key properties within the framework of current market realities (building height is a significant controversy in the area, but the community's vision for the level of density and vibrancy on the Downtown Waterfront is unclear). Since Edmonds Crossing is inactive, the updated vision should also reorient the community's desires for how the existing ferry terminal is integrated into the Downtown Waterfront. Similarly, the updated vision should explain how the Port of Edmonds, the waterfront parks, the Unocal Property, Edmonds Station, and other major waterfront properties and amenities are best related and planned for in the future. Sea level rise should also be considered. This should include an update to the Downtown Master Plan land use designation and description that currently applies to Harbor Square, Salish Crossing, and the rail/bus transit center (see page 56 of the Comprehensive Plan). See related Recommendations 1.13, 3.C, 5.A, and 11.E. Recommendation 11.113. Based on land use patterns on other Pacific Northwest waterfronts, it is reasonable to believe that there may be demand for new hotel rooms on the Edmonds waterfront. Given the unique potential of a beachfront hotel, the City should adopt Comprehensive Plan policies that support working to attract a hotel operator and associated uses (restaurant, water -related, and/or other commercial). Hotels can anchor waterfront destinations and their customers typically have higher spending power than local permanent residents of an area, which will help support nearby commercial space in the area. The City should explore a range of strategies to attract a hotel, including first conducting a hotel feasibility study, developing a targeted incentives package, and identifying and potentially acquiring an appropriate site, among others. City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 45 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 57 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Recommendation 11.C. Consider adopting Comprehensive Plan policies, zoning updates, and shoreline management updates that facilitate allowing a wider mix of land uses of all types in the Commercial Waterfront (CW) zone. As demand for many office and retail uses ebbs (due to work -from home and online shopping trends), greater flexibility is needed for properties to find economically stable and viable uses that will in turn support employment and commercial activity in the waterfront and wider Downtown area. Recommendation 11.D. The height limitations in the waterfront area (generally three -stories) are likely to lock most buildings in place as they are today for the coming decades. Given that most development is likely to take place via adaptive reuse, the City should consider adopting Comprehensive Plan policies that support an adaptive reuse incentive program, which can provide technical or financial assistance to property owners for design and engineering assessments; fa4ade, systems or interior improvements; seismic retrofits; or other building improvements. Good local examples are in Vancouver and Tacoma. Recommendation 11.E. Where new development or adaptive reuse projects are proposed adjacent to the railroad, encourage buildings to incorporate soundproofing that mitigates the impacts of railroad traffic. This could occur through updates to zoning standards, the locally adopted building code, or education of permitting staff and applicants. Design standards should require that railroad - facing frontages avoid blank walls, however, and should incorporate artwork, landscaping, and modulated building design to provide a welcoming gateway to railroad passengers and visitors. Recommendation 11.F. The height limitations in the waterfront area (generally three -stories) are likely to lock most buildings in place as they are today for the coming decades. If the City is interested in encouraging redevelopment or infill development of surface parking lots, consider adopting Comprehensive Plan policies that support exploration of the tradeoffs of modest and strategic height or density bonuses in exchange for desired land uses and public benefits/amenities, and which consider view corridors. Recommendation 11.G. Continue the legal efforts to finish the waterfront walkway. Recommendation 11.H. Conduct a comprehensive parking study of the Downtown Waterfront area between SR-104 and the shoreline to understand current utilization, find opportunities for consolidated parking and shared parking, and analyze possible changes to parking regulations for off- street and on -street parking. The study should consider differences between residential and non- residential uses and the effects of priced parking. The study should include a comparison of the amount of surface parking between Edmonds and similar downtown waterfronts such as, but not limited to, Anacortes, Port Angeles, Bremerton, Port Townsend, and Kirkland. Recommendation 11.1. Consider changing the Marina Beach Park land use designation from Master Planned Development to Open Space and rezoning it from Commercial Waterfront to Public Use. This would more accurately accommodate the use and purpose of the park as a public recreation site. The redesignation and rezoning could potentially occur alongside similar actions for the Unocal Property (see the recommendations in Section 3). City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 46 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 58 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Section 12 - Sources Documents Document No. 8005060198 and Reference No. R-1979-4, Agreement and Covenant Constituting a Contract Rezone, (1998), City of Edmonds and Port of Edmonds. o Ordinance No. 3411 and Reference No. R-2002-38, Covenant Regarding Use and Future Development g (Contract Rezone), (2002), City of Edmonds and Union Oil Company of California. > Washington State 2010-2030FreightRailPlan(2009), Exhibit 3-12, Washington State Department of o Transportation. Final Vehicle Reservation System Predesign Study (2010), Washington State Ferries. co Edmonds City Council Resolution 1263 (2011). �a E Edmonds City Council Resolution 1280 (2012). L IL Memorandum: Cherry Point Coal Export Facility Rai/ Operations(2012), for City of Edmonds Public W Works by Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. o Washington State Rai/Plan: Integrated Freight and Passenger Rail Plan 2013-2035 (2014), Figure 4.3, c� c Washington State Department of Transportation. E E Economic Evaluation ofRegiona/ Impacts for the Proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point (2014), for the Puget Sound Regional Council by The PFM Group, Parametrix, and HR&A Advisors. Letter (January 8, 2014), from Washington State Department of Transportation to City of Edmonds. Snohomish County Hazard Mitigation Plan, Volume2, City of EdmondsAnnex(September 2015), a� _ Snohomish County. _ ii Edmonds Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan (2016), City of Edmonds. Y Letter (March 17, 2017), from Washington State Department of Transportation to City of Edmonds. r CO Letter (April 17, 2017), from City of Edmonds to Washington State Department of Transportation. 0 Sea Level Rise in Edmonds, WA: Expected Impacts & Recommended/1 ctions (2017), project report by L Disaster Reduction and Emergency Planning Studio, ENVS 476, Western Washington University. Topics Related to Restoration ofthe Edmonds Marsh (2017), project reports by Ecological Restoration 'a _ class, ESCI 470, Western Washington University. ° E New or Expanded Elements of the Port of Edmonds Master- East Side. Harbor Square Redevelopment w Plan (2014), Port of Edmonds. r Edmonds Waterfront A ccess Study (2016), for the City of Edmonds by Tetra Tech, Inc. _ d E Expanded Marsh Concept Design and Hydraulic Modeling Report(2019), for the City of Edmonds Public Works Department by Shannon and Wilson, Inc. Q w 20205ervice Implementation Plan, (November 2019), Sound Transit. E s c� r r City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 47 Q Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 59 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Washington State Ferries2040 Long Range Plan (2019), Exhibit 5-6, Exhibit 5-5, Exhibit 5-6, Washington State Department of Transportation. o U Washington State Rail Plan 2079-2040(2020), Washington State Department of Transportation. Marina Beach Park& Willow Creek Daylighting Project (2020), PowerPoint by City of Edmonds Parks, o Recreation & Cultural Services. 0 N Guide to the QuietZone Establishment Process (May 2020), Federal Railroad Administration. > https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2020-05/QuietZoneBrochure.pdf o L r- National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance Rate Map, panel 1292 of 1575 (revised June 19, CU 2020), Federal Emergency Management Agency. Comments to Save Our Marsh, document by Washington State Department of Transportation (August = 13, 2020). E d CityofEdmonds Comprehensive Plan (November 17, 2020), City of Edmonds. a 2027 Session Laws of the State of Washington, Chapter 333, Substitute Senate Bill 5165, 0 Transportation Budget, §213(5). https://Ieg.wa.gov/CodeReviser/documents/sessionlaw/2021 pam4.pdf#page=29 E Media c Edmonds City Council pulls plug on beleaguered Harbor Square project (October 8, 2013), My Edmonds News. Council votes to kill controversial Edmonds Waterfront Connector project (June 19, 2019), My N Edmonds News. _ =a c Council agrees to zoning change that will allowhotels on Edmonds waterfront (February 9, 2021), My ii Edmonds News. Q Y BNSFRailway confirms plans to double track Edmonds in 2023, but key questions remain (September 0 6, 2021), My Edmonds News. y Video Calls c ° Note: Consultant firm names below are abbreviated. Full names are: MAKERS architecture and urban It Q design; Leland Consulting Group; and The Watershed Company. Video calls with Washington State Department of Transportation and Washington State Ferries, City of c Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 12 and November 23, 2021). E w Video call with Tulalip Tribes, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Watershed (October 18, 2021). Video call with Sound Transit, City of Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 17, 2021). r E Video call with Port of Edmonds, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Leland (October 19, 2021). 0 Video call with Community Transit, City of Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 19, 2021). Q w Video call with Save Our Marsh, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Watershed (October 19, 2021). E s c� r r City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 48 Q Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 60 7.A.a Edmonds Waterfront Issues Project - Key Findings and Recommendations Memo Video call with JSH Properties, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Leland (October 20, 2021). Video call with BNSF Railway, City of Edmonds, and MAKERS (October 22, 2021). Video call with Lund Consulting, City of Edmonds, MAKERS, and Watershed (November 3, 2021). Emails Email from Edmonds staff (October 7, 2021). Email from BNSF (October 15, 2021). Email from Sound Transit (November 24, 2021). Email from Washington State Department of Transportation and Washington State Ferries (November 22 and 23, 2021; February 8, 2022). Email from Long Bay Enterprises Inc. (December 16, 2021). Email from Washington State Department of Transportation (February 8, 2022). Email from Community Transit (February 11, 2022). Email from Washington State Department of Ecology (April 11, 2022). Websites Unocal, Edmonds Bulk Fuel Terminal,0778, Washington State Department of Ecology. https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/gsp/Sitepage.aspx?csid=5180 Edmonds Marsh, City of Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services. https://edmondswa.gov/services/parks rec/discovery programs/explore discovery places/edmon ds marsh TraffcStatistics, Washington State Department of Transportation, Washington State Ferries. https://wsdot.wa.gov/travel/washington-state-ferries/about-us/washington-state-ferries- planning/traffic-statistics Sal,monScape, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. https://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/salmonscape/map.html The Train Horn Rule and Quiet Zones, Federal Railroad Administration. https://raiIroads.dot.gov/highway-rail-crossing-and-trespasser-programs/train-horn-rulequiet- zones/train-horn-rule-and-quiet Washington Geol,ogical,l,nformation Portal,, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources. https://geologyportal.dnr.wa.gov/2d-view#wigm?-1 3628270,-13619098,6072591,6077019 City of Edmonds I Development Services, Planning Division Page 49 a Edmonds Waterfront Key Findings and Recommendations Memo_22-0714 Packet Pg. 61 7.A.b Waterfront Vision Design Concept Sept 11, 2024 �V1LzC Aqenda 7.A.b EpMOND ❑ Waterfront On -going Projects ❑ Study Recommendations ❑ Community Engagement Summary ❑ Design Concept - Key Elements ❑ Land use ❑ Goals & Policies ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 63 Ion Components of VDicesVision P 77-- Edmonds' Waterfront Ferry Terminal ..jpft The Puget Sound Edmonds Waterfront Center Olympic Beach Edmonds Fishing Pier Port of Edmonds Marina & Boardwalk l Marina Beach Park Unocal Site T diffu 1r j Brackett's Landing South Vill 46 Willow Creek Edmonds Marsh � m �4 � Y�, - 1N. }� • 1 - is i � r,. i : j ; n e+ r ..� � •�.N 7Gl`p5 EpMON . • OEdmonds Crossing New Ferry Terminal Project Cancelled ©Marsh Restoration Dependent on Unocal Property Clean Up © Transfer of Unocal Property Site cleanup almost complete OMissing Pedestrian Walkway link Litigation cleared Oct, 2023 ©Bulkhead Reconstruction construction estimated to begin in 2025 OSound Transit Station Access Projects Delayed O BNSF Railway Double Tracking Part of multi -year capital investment plan, Timeline unknown QMarina Beach Park improvements Design ana construction occurring 2024 - 2026 (Independent Masterplan) .- Ah 't Dina Pro -IF" 7.A.b N 0 a E a Packet Pg. 65 r �� L SDM�WN, nn Recommendations from 2022 Council H AW% 1. Create a New Vision for the Waterfront. 2. Recognize and Support the Edmonds Ferry Terminal's Current Location. 3. Prioritize Edmonds Marsh & Willow Creek Restoration. 4. Plan for Improved Emergency Management of the Waterfront. 7.A.b r --------------------------------- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------ City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 66 7.A.b c 0 d m L a Packet Pg. 67 EVMONDS Key Thi; Future forward urban design • what do you want the "vibe" of the Waterfront area to be? • What activities are preferred? • what should be open to the public and what is private? • How do we connect The Waterfront to Downtown through Main St. and Dayton? • Does this vision include more residential? Retail? Civic uses? • How do we manage parking here? Ah 7.A.b 0 L Marsh and ecological Waterfront functionality of the waterfront access/integration E L a • How can we make the Marsh How can we serve Q publicly accessible and emergency o protect the ecological services' needs?, restoration? • Do you think we need a L • How do we keep the flora and pedestrian bridge? fauna safe? • What are the benefits vs • How do we keep visitors safe? • How do we transition and integrate the Marsh into the larger pedestrian network? • How do we futureproof the - - Marsh for climate change? the costs? • Let's talk about aesthetics. What ideas are there for design? Packet Pg. 68 7.A.b Future Forward Urban Design What did we hear from the community? EDMO p5 Am • Elevate pedestrian experience with signature routes to parks, activity nodes and downtown • Activate the waterfront family friendly activities. • Seamlessly connect Brackett Landing and Olympic Beach. • Prioritize green space over vehicle space; consolidate parking and reduce impervious surface 7.A.b Olympic Beach 3 — — — — — — — � BrackeWs — — — — ., Marina � / � � � — _ — — _ Landing S i BeachlParki ®Port of 4 'an2 on1 Edmds Waterfront Center " Brackett's Edmonds' I Marsh i Willow 6 Creek My park Landing N Harbor Sq I I / ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 70 p5 EDM� • I MTNI T M Me ll: :rW11 [• 7.A.b Recreation: Dog parks, walking and biking trails, bird -watching. Waterfront: Beach activities and experiences (kayaking, paddleboarding, boating), waterfront seating, and umbrellas. Civic amenities: Public parks, cultural centers, senior center, restrooms, first aid centers and community spaces. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 71 Gp5 EDM0 •_ W OW__ 9l IRMS Community: Gathering spaces, cultural festivals, music, and seasonal events. Family -Friendly: Kid -friendly activities; playful street furnishings, nature -based learning History and Culture: Cultural walks, collaboration with local tribes on culturally appropriate art and representation Educational: Programs on environmental conservation and wildlife preservation 7.A.b ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 72 p5 EDM� 1r r'I • Support designs that blend with the surroundings while preserving its unique identity and charm. • Prioritize natural elements such as water features, native vegetation, and scenic views to enhance the overall aesthetic quality. • Infuse artistic elements such as murals, sculptures, and cultural exhibits reflecting local heritage and character. • Engage with local artists, architects and designers to gather ideas on a design identity. • Incorporate sustainable design such as green infrastructure, solar energy, and recycled materials 7.A.b ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 73 0 L d w+ 2CU 7 E L a 7.A.b 2.Marsh and ecological functionality of the waterfront What did we hear from the community? p5 EDM� •l [6I0 •l 1111 Y. Make Marsh publicly accessible and promote ecological restoration • Design elevated platforms, view pods, or observation decks. • Implement designated pathways to protect flora and fauna and prevent habitat destruction. • Implement educational signage to inform visitors about the importance of the marsh ecosystem. • Designate Marsh as an `Open space' with access to water, creating passive recreation — a unique opportunity for Edmonds. Cattail Marsh Wetlands Education Center I Beaumont,TX 7.A.b ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 75 0 L E a pS EDMO ate Resilience and • Address impacts of sea level rise, flooding, and temperature changes. • Establish natural buffers to mitigate sea level rise and increased flooding. • Collaborate with coastal and wetland ecology experts • Monitor and research climate impacts. • Provide community education on climate resilience and stewardship. • Follow natural shoreline designs to absorb waves and mitigate sea level rise effects. :llfi:ls 7.A.b By 2100, sea levels in Washington are likely to rise 1.5 to 2.5 ft. Sources: Miller et al. 2018, UW CIG 2023 Coastal Flooding Higher tides move storm surge higher and further inland. Extreme events will be more frequent; too -year floods could become to -year floods. Habitat Loss Rising seas reduce the size of mudflats, marshes and intertidal habitats. if there is no upland area available for migration, these habitats will be lost as sea level rise. at Salinity Change Higher sea levels cause higher groundwater levels. This increase in salinity harms wells, septic systems and vegetation, which reduces soil stability and water quality. Erosion and Deposition Higher waters move shoreline materials and sediments. Depending on shoreline conditions, this causes land to erode or grow. Source: Coastal Hazards Resilience Network — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 76 7.A.b 3-Waterfront Access and Integration What did we hear from the community? Multi -modal Connectivity • Concerns about traffic management, pedestrian safety, and accessibility for people with disabilities. • A multimodal hub to integrate ferry, bus, Amtrak, ride - share, and bike facilities, with improved public transit, and pedestrian -friendly amenities. • Pedestrian access on SR104, better connections to train, ferry station. • Create signage and wayfinding systems that guide pedestrians, highlighting its historic & ecological significance. Multi -purpose facility Wayfinding Town Centre integration Retail Access 9 Convenience Journey information Ticketing Waiting areas lit ; Toilets ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 78 p5 EDM� EIRT91STe"N r 0 0 7.A.b 0 L d • Expand pedestrian -only areas. • Design parking areas with permeable surfaces, GSI, and EV charging stations. • Consider parking maximums and ensure ADA access. • Encourage micro -mobility (e-bikes, bike share, scooter share) • Consider innovative strategies for peak demand periods (summer events) __________________________________________________________________________________ City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 79 p5 EDM� :111.1Am W • Plan for emergency access routes and services to ensure public safety. • Collaboration among different waterfront agencies for emergency preparedness. • Consider future technologies to help access between the east & west sides of the tracks. Ah Prepared By: Edmonds Police Department; Crime Analyst M. Reeves 7.A.b ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 80 7.A.b Draft Design Concept Staff approached the design based on Community's ideas Gl`�`� Our Approach 7.A.b EDN .. Balancing People & Nature E • Re -building Marina Beach Park Integrating green Enhancing the a pockets along the view corridors • Re -imagine Port walk & Admiral Way waterfro ; ---L- CL .. ------- • Re-claiming Edmonds Marsh -- ---- Activate Admiral way I U --_-, --- ' Ease of �� i ►1 E access to - •• - - - Marina �` �`' a Beach Park o . • 1 G0 � 't y eae ` C. New green pockets Safe netwi s Existing parks ,� from Dowl vn �e� to Waterfri Q View corridors Universally accessible Pedestrian connections NEW Bike connections ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 82 7.A.b .40 �• 2 -,me• ••.••• •N• ••w . ••••.• 0 r• , O • •##mire{ Wl� - .-• ....... .. .-.Gem i0_�d � m Railroad Ave. - '• _ • • �• ••• '•f• L 10 " •w • •- 0-0• • •• • •' • • • / r Ole, • • � �• • •, ` ♦ !� • • • •� • � to •• ti • • �' .• �� •.• • Aye. -Z .1 d `�,•?IL 14 • • Ord d • y� Existing Green Open Space • • N diet 40 •�•��Ole •• •''• �� E 46 a� illow Creek Salmon & 1 ��ti 16 't , sr �• ti � 4A• f/ Watershed Education Center • • • • • -Aft.r / •• 1� • .. • Packet Pg. 83 • _ .•. _ '. A 1 r - - ,A d"fw_779 Sao 7wolt .•• Emergency Access Road and Bike path .p • Proposed Green Open Space 1.1, w .L niversally Accessibl Pedestrian Path 12 0 10 44. z 21 �l�L• _ � .,�,nmwvvmm�vvnvrm�+* ..• fC *% .I • �� . - s a -f • • �•.. r Multi -modal Transit Hub Are -- •. 91. 1 INEW Pedestrian Crossing �.• •+ • :% -4at James Street 00 3rd A,je v. `NEW intersection at Alder Street/104 J N • • �jryCJ - N • ,;�. -s Proposed Green Open �'� • Space E ,Marsh Boardwalk ti . • Expand Edmonds Marsh. w • • Add marsh boardwalk loop; NEW Shared Use Path with viewin platforms and 5 1�,A•; tii !.%* educationalinstallations. • ' � . � • Consolidate parking along a � �• / } the boardwalk and replace .� % p illow Creek Salmon & 1 / ��•', with public open space/ Watershed Education Center # green spaces. Packet Pg. 84 / •;& �. I Emergency Access Road and Bike path =I I • • Waterfront Pedestrian Loop �JJJ1J 1Jlaaaa�'J J13) �.,• •w J niversally Accessibl /,i� edestrian Path A6,� 12 10 4J . a..► `-- 8• o . % yJi �, •� •� • 5IL ) , L Multi -modal Transit Hub Are 5 ° U NEW Pedestrian Crossing �..' • •� at James Street �. g � , ..•f`'�rd Ave 3 �•. / NEW intersection at Alder Street/104 6 -"•.��pN , �•'� S'+ ,• ' h Ave. ... J • Marsh Boardwalk . � ° • -t Create a network of `NEW Shared Use Path eL accessible pathways and 7. Z• • trails that prioritize '� r' • • • pedestrians and connects illow Creek Salmon & 1 Watershed Education Center key destinations. Packet Pg. 85 Emergency Access Road and Bike path % % 4r • 0 XXV 16 16.t; L P niversally Accessib Pedestrian Path 12 10 4 ----------- L M E Le Multi -modal Transit Hub ArE S 140 0 C-) kNEW Pedestrian Crossing 0 06 at James Street E p,,je. (L C 0 NEW intersection at Alder Street/104 > 00 K 4♦, IV oil 0 il� 0 a ill I ISO" W 04 % 10 W *� -5 Marsh Boardwalk VI kNEW§hared Use Path Create a bike loop I % :��►=:�.to promote active i0rckt--rpn+ir%n nnrl f-r%nnno-fca 401111, 00. . 0" • t, % key destinations Willow Creek Salmon & 00, ��% 4 -3 Edmonds Loop Marsh Loop 8 131., 1 1, Watershed Education Center Packet Pg. 86 Waterfront Bike Loop RE -IMAGINE PORTWALK AND ADMIRAL WAY Enhance the functionality �5 Transform Admiral and aesthetics of the > F , -� Way into a vibrant, boat parking area and �<� ,ti " " -" s' multimodal corridor that create a seamless, safe, and enjoyable supports diverse uses and encourages active pedestrian connection ="� transportation, creating a to Marina Beach Park, safer, more dynamic, and promoting accessibility and :��: :..: accessible environment for recreational use. ;.;,�~ all users. jCreate a wide f landscaped promenade along the boardwalk. i� ., n yii Ili k'* 1OR-� G Viewin 4 Platform Create open spaces that visually connect the Marsh to Puget Sound Create transition betwee a Portwalk and beach througCL landscaped steps down to the boat launch connectinc c to the pedestrian path L) RE -CONNECT DOWNTOWN AND WATERFRONT LAdmi. Po" Moll- - --------- Create a network of pathways Arts CentE of pathways and amenities that prioritize pedestrians and connects the main destinations between the Downtown and the Waterfront. Harbor Square Create mid -block Y streets with public squares as focal points of activity and function as gathering spaces. kk M M _j p Reorganize North Bracket CL Landing area: New building with view 0 3 terraces, spaces for divinc i>, related retail, coffee shop! S and public amenities. E Widened pedestrian path along the beach and a improved drop-off loop. 0 r4bW C4 E Create a multi -modal M 71mobility transit hub that 5 integrates ferry, bus, Amtr ncrease street ride -share, and bike facilit accessibility and providing commuters and E permeability travelers with convenient =0 M) from Downtown _,j transportation options. core to the Opportunity to create pub < Waterfront by plaza within the hub featuring creating more seating ar a s. landscar)in signalized art install Packet Pg .8�8 intersections. integrated small erc i a , :i RE -CONNECT DOWNTOWN AND r� WATERFRONT ALTERNATIVES FOR PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE OVER THE TRAIN TRACKS -Ji , t- Alternative 1: Across James Street To Waterfront r•,Center ................. Brackett's • Landing South To Ferry i '' ��dmonds WaYi SR 104 v^ From 3 Downtown �o N ; Core in Alternative 2: Connecting Art Center/Amtrak Station to Waterfront center To beach Waterfront Center Train Station' Arts Center i 7J ►•••e . •� �an, • FcO S�n9 `... Cros f 7.A.b Bridge connects to the beach with ram - and elevators. The elevators are sized to accommodate a c emergency vehicle o that is golf cart siz( Bridge landing within multi -modal mobility hub. .7a; a Traffic calming: Raised and widene crosswalk at Jame St/ Edmonds way intersection. Bridge lands withir the parking lot of Waterfront Center with ramp and elevators. The elevators are sized to accommodate a emergency vehicle that is golf cart siz( Bridge is actively used by commuter Bridge accessed a through the Q proposed public plaza next to Arts Center Packet Pg. 89 p5 EDM� N 7eTeTe=A a le I 10 =e: •Y.[llIAm w 1. New public plazas within Salish Crossing & Harbor Square. 2. Extending the Port's proposed plaza till the Marsh to create a visual corridor. 3. Reconfigure Boat Parking to optimize efficiency and allow additional uses and/or additional open space. 4. Additional pocket parks, open spaces along the boardwalk, and spaces for pop-up uses connected by bike and pedestrian pathways. 5. Multi -Use path along Edmonds Way to Marsh. 6. Wide landscape promenade along the boardwalk. too HarborSqu IV, 7.A.b k 4: 0 1 0 alish Cry 'ng � x � E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 90 EDM0N�S' • 3.� r HE MARSH t r, P = n • Create "Edmonds Marsh Visitor Education Center" • Enhance visitor experience while harmonizing with surroundings • Utilize natural S materials, low -impact building techniques 1 and reflect the Pacific Northwest aesthetic ---------------- f A boardwalk around the Marsh with viewing platforms, establishi a `Restoration Education Center' or `Salmon Awareness Center.' -- •. - yL- 1 •L a t aiK wiinin the tith educational and bird -watching VOW • p5 EDM� � (7 Explore opportunities to highlight the Underwater Dive Parkas a unique destination attracting visitors and promoting marine conservation awareness. • Install interpretive signage and educational displays to highlight the unique features and significance of the Underwater Dive Park. • Permit and support local dive shops and organizations to promote diving and snorkeling through guided tours and instructional programs. • Partner with schools, universities, and marine research institutions to promote marine conservation, education, and scientific research. • Encourage activities that allow visitors to explore the marine life and habitats of the Underwater Dive Park. 0 7.A.b ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 92 Ld 1 IH . 1 frr lot - 1 . .1 I �•\\ 1 f 1 • -� - _ rri II.I.-..� 11 11111 �1 - ��•�/ - - -��... '.s-3r. Boat Launch Locations ©Exisitng Port Administration Building! `� 1 ©New Public Plaza with Amenities �' y� �' • ' - • - • • OExisting Waterfront Center ©Art Center OTrain Station ORetail Village �+ • f OExisting Hotel �'' • - ONew Marina Beach Park • (Do Brackett's Landing South t s'' s,� • r' i, .r',. r_. 11vBrackett's Landing North ► • ��` / Enhanced North Jetty jDEducational Signage ;Viewing PlatformsIF �� - • O� �DaylightingCroe k f s , f 0Educational Pavillion �.'• --'. ♦r ' • Marsh Visitor's Center �' ,!'� . �,� � 0 • HotelCV �R Food and Beverage Anchor • v � ` � . '� �y \ Future Uses i ,, { , rI �.+,► Pedestrian TunnelATF1 Packet Pg. 93 • • , Brackett Landing Activity Area �' .� ♦ . , - - k "i ®, ED L=°` D -NW V�_ Voices GMpNpS Community isio 80 positive responses regarding community's likes about the concept vision Dislikes: • Strong opposition to the planned waterfront hotel. • Significant concern about parking, with some feeling that parking issues are being downplayed • Feasibility of a pedestrian tunnel. • Need for better recognition and acknowledgment of historical Indigenous presence • Sea -level rise, there is concern about climate change impacts. • Protecting underwater ecosystems. • Concerns about the overall costs and the feasibility of moving forward with the plans. Ah 7.A.b Do Vou think the CitV is moving in the right direction? 3a YES NO PARTIALLY AGREE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 94 0 L E L a 5 EDM p •12I911N[• Permitted Examples of Major Zones in the Residential Permitted Non - Waterfront Study Area Height Limit Density Limit Uses Residential Uses Commercial Waterfront 30 t-- - Pd - n Marine -oriented (CW) service, retail, office, hotels General Commercial (CG) 35 feet None None Most non-residential with Harbor Square contract uses rezone .. ........... -........................................................................................................................ ------------------------------------..------------......------------------------------. Other Harbor Square contract rezone requirements include minimum 25 feet setbacks from streets and the marsh, required screening of service and storage areas, and requiring all development to receive Architectural Design Board approval. Community Business (BC) 25-30 feet* 3.0 FAR max. Single-family Retail, restaurants, and multifamily offices, services Master Plan Hillside 35 feet 3 FAR Multi family Office, hotel, Mixed -use Zones restaurants, public MP1 facilities Master Plan Hillside 35 feet 4 FAR Multi family Neighborhood Mixed -use Zones (except ground oriented Retail, MP2 floor) Office, hotel, restaurants, public facilities * Maximum height depends on roof design •Ul l ot• 600 300 0 600 1,200 Feet N W E S Marina R-1979-4 CG Edmonds, �IVla�rg-h V 0 U) 0 Z 0 Z> 0 w 0 L R E =a IL ®®� � C a 0 o ' q Q V 3T 0 F ��I DA' T P Z ARM o ; N c t _ Q N c E City Park' R Q Packet Pg. 95 Gp5 EDMO An 71 61 2 14Ka •1 1MIeY The Edmonds waterfront is a vibrant, resilient, pedestrian -friendly recreational destination that supports diverse activities, preserves ecological integrity, and promotes community well-being. • Enhance pedestrian experiences and vibrant public realm. • Create a continuous network of green spaces, pathways, and trails • Preserve and enhance the waterfront's natural character • Enhance ecological functionality and promote the restoration of natural habitats • Promote educational awareness and community engagement • Foster resilience and sustainability • Address climate change impacts • Promote long-term ecological health • Improve public access to the shoreline • Address safety concerns • Implement effective parking management while encouraging multimodal integration • Plan for comprehensive emergency access and preparedness • Explore opportunities to highlight the Underwater Park as a unique destination • Honor the Indigenous history, recognize the existing presence of Indigenous groups and build relationships • Ensure context -appropriate future development 7.A.b ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 96 0 L E L a Implementation Strategies/Actions C O L Develop a sub -area plan with clear objectives, specific design guidelines, infrastructure plans, and phased implementation strategies E Includes transportation studies and analysis to • Identify potential locations to develop a multimodal transit hub O • Respond to growth and changing travel demands, improving connectivity for rail, ferry, bus, bicycle, walking, and ridesharing. E • Improve connections from the waterfront to neighboring areas to increase visibility and 7a; a visitors o • Enhance connections to the regional transit system • Conduct parking studies and develop a parking management plan • Coordinate circulation and public parking with Port development. Plan for future joint public/private development involving WSDOT , BNSF, Community Transit for infrastructure planning, property acquisition, parking management, development incentives, and potential modifications to land use regulations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- City of Edmonds Comprehensive Plan U Packet Pg. 97 7.A.b 00101:_TL• 1 1 scan the QR code to access the Design harette/Concept discussion materials & mmunity poll resul c 0 L M L M E .@ L a Packet Pg. 98 7.B Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/11/2024 2025-2030 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Staff Lead: Angie Feser Department: Parks, Recreation & Human Services Prepared By: Angie Feser Background/History The City's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Element is updated annually and identifies capital projects for at least the next six years, which support the City's Comprehensive Plan. CFP projects are capital improvement projects that expand existing facilities/infrastructure or provide new capital facilities to accommodate the City's projected population growth in accordance with the Growth Management Act. Thus, capital projects that preserve existing capital facilities are not CFP projects. These preservation projects are part of the six -year capital improvement program (CIP) along with capital facility plan projects that encompass the projected expenditure needs for all city capital related projects. Staff Recommendation Public Works and Parks & Recreation departments staff presentation, Planning Board questions and answers and related discussion. Narrative The 2025-2030 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) are being presented with project lists that identify Capital Facility projects and project information sheets for all projects and programs. The Public Works and Utilities Department proposed 2025-2030 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 1. The Parks & Recreation proposed 2025-2030 CFP/CIP is included as Attachment 2. With the city transitioning to a biennium operating budget format, the years alternating operating budget adoption provide a better opportunity to review capital budgets in greater depth. Next year in 2025 there will be more time and staff capacity to review in detail, and incorporate, the 2024 Transportation Plan, the Storm and Surface Water Plan Update, as well as the 2024 Comprehensive Plan (including a Facilities Element). Recommendations from these three significant plans, which will not be completed for this year's capital program review, will be instrumental in developing the 2026-2031 CFP/CIP Plans. The next steps include a Planning Board Public Hearing scheduled for September 25, 2024. A summary of this presentation will be provided and the Planning Board is requested to develop a recommendation to City Council. Following the Planning Board's action, the City Council will also hold a Public Hearing scheduled in October prior to final approval and adoption. Attachments: Packet Pg. 99 7.B Public Works and Utilities 2025-2030 CIP and CFP 2025-2030 Parks CIP CFP DRAFT Packet Pg. 100 Packet Pg. 101 TRANSPORTATION & UTILITY PROJECT MAP FACILITIES & WWTP PROJECT MAP TRANSPORTATION PRESERVATION/MAINTENANCE SAFETY/CAPACITY ANALYSIS NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION FERRY PROJECTS TRAFFIC CALMING TRAFFIC PLANNING GREEN STREETS WATER STORMWATER EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT ANNUALLY FUNDED COMPLIANCE RELATED SEWER FACILITIES WASTEWATER TREATMENT a um a v 0 M O N w N O N N d D M _ N L O c.i a a� E a Packet Pg. 102 7.B.a PWT-05 FPW,I,��T-07 PWT-65 �X-.� PWT-04 ,— PWT-51 • PWT-03 PWT-09 PWT-12 W�6 '�r ■■■■■■ PWT-35 `PWT-37 < WD-19 PWT-16 PWT'S5 � PWT-48 P� PWT-11 PWT-25 .'� PWT-15 PWT-20 PWT-22 PWT-08 PWT-21 �_ PWT-�9 • PWT-30 PWTI20 PWT-13 PWT-14 PWT-47 P.WT 3W, PWT-31 PWT-06 PWT-23 PWTi64 PWT-50 PWT-06 PWS-11 - -.�.� PWD-07 '� = �� ►� PWD-06 J WP PWT-26 ��' PWT-10 � • * Site specific projects only. Citywide/annual citywide projects not shown. PWT-43 Packet P g' 103 ST 0 - �w o PWF-13s���� O� 00' �m �M d4 = IV . 04 T .■ no PWF-01� � AN >�� ~ PWF-16 PWF-03 0 flo'iw: �i WF-10 •�PiW&09; tow"" Era- i ■a "Im I not - Cr, i m a �-j 4 w7l W 1 ■� ■E = PWF-09 IWF-03 I • PWrP 1FWAG PWF 7 PWF-10 1 M OAF-23 PWF_ PW_F-13 PWF-2A 6- r �Lr.l V �111111 �� • �1111� LI r 0 * Site specific projects only. Citywide/a—nnual citywide iii PWF-08 • --TWA �-A ROOM"., iv ' roiects no sown." PWF-1 • Packet Pg. 104 TRANSPORTATIO '540 r. 4�.�C7 - d r -47 OL t4 is ink C.ATE 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 7.B.a TRANSPORTATION PRESERVATION/ MAINTENANCE PWT-01 Annual Street Preservation Program PWT-04 Main St Overlay from 6th Ave to 8th Ave PWT-05 Puget Dr @ OVD Signal Upgrades PWT-06 ✓ Signal Upgrades -100th Ave @ 238th St SW PWT-07 Main St @ 3rd Signal Upgrades PWT-61 Olympic View Dr Overlay -196th / SR-524 to Talbot Rd PWT-68 88th Avenue Overlay and Sidewalk Repair SAFETY/ CAPACITY ANALYSIS PWT-08 228th St SW from Hwy 99 to 95th PI W Corridor PWT-09 Hwy 99 Revitalization & Gateway Project - Stage 2 PWT-10 ✓ Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 3 PWT-11 ✓ Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 4 PWT-12 ✓ Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 5 PWT-13 ✓ Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 6 PWT-14 ✓ Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 7 PWT-15 ✓ Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 8 PWT-16 ✓ Hwy 99 Revitalization Project - Stage 9 PWT-17 196th St SW / 88th Ave W - Intersection ✓ Improvements 24125 Z112b Z121Total E U- U_ c $1,801,800 $855,400 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $0 $10,547,200 $0 a $10,547,20( w m w $642,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $642,020 $0 $642,02( ' LL $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $526,000 $0 $621,000 $0 $621,00( Q cU $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $820,000 $0 $995,000 $0 $995,00( c M O $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $406,000 $0 $523,000 $0 $523,00( LO O $484,000 $963,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,447,700 $0 $1,447,70( a LL $1,180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,180,000 $0 $1,180,00( c c� a_ U $0 $0 $0 $1,533,000 $2,650,000 $13,900,000 $18,083,000 $0 $18,083,00( c N $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,00( c N $1,984,000 $1,683,000 $2,489,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $25,763,000 $0 N $25,763,00( °' $825,000 $1,620,000 $5,000,000 $4,955,000 $13,100,000 $10,000,000 $35,500,000 $0 r $35,500,00( c $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $1,060,000 $2,090,000 $3,680,000 $46,293,000 M $49,973,00( $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000 L O $22,500,00( �: 2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900,000 M $42,900,00( a $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,500,000 $37,500,00( m E $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000 t $22,500,00( r Q $0 $0 $0 $279,000 $252,000 $835,000 $1,366,000 $0 $1,366,006 Packet Pg. 106 7.B.a TRANSPORTATION PWT-18 ✓ Main St @ 9th Ave Intersection Improvements PWT-19 76th Ave W @ 220th St SW - Intersection ✓ Improvements PWT-20 SR-104 Adaptive System - 236th to 226th PWT-21 SR-104 @ 100th Ave W Intersection ✓ Improvements PWT-22 ✓ SR-104 @ 95th PI W Intersection Improvements PWT-23 SR-104 @ 238th St SW Intersection ✓ Improvements PWT-24 Olympic View Dr @ 76th Ave W Intersection ✓ Improvements PWT-25 ✓ 84th Ave W (212th St SW to 238th St SW) PWT-26 SR-104 @ 76th Ave W Intersection ✓ Improvements PWT-27 Olympic View Dr @ 174th St SW Intersection ✓ Improvements PWT-28 175th St SW Slope Repair PWT-59 Traffic Signal Program PWT-70 Safety Action Plan NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PWT-29 ✓ 232nd St SW Walkway from 100th Ave to SR-104 PWT-30 236th St SW Walkway from Madrona Elem to ✓ 97th Ave W PWT-31 236th St SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave ✓ W PWT-32 84th Ave W Walkway from 238th St SW to 234th ✓ St SW PWT-33 80th Ave W Walkway from 212th St SW to 206th ✓ St SW 24125 Z112b Z121i i i Total i E- LL tU $0 $0 $0 $210,000 $1,157,000 $0 $1,367,000 $0 $1,367,001 C $198,000 $1,488,500 $2,100,000 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0 $10,456,500 $0 a $10,456,501 d r $67,740 $0 $0 $3,515,000 $0 $0 $3,582,740 $0 $3,582,741 '5 LL $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,350,000 $2,650,000 $4,200,000 $0 $4,200,001 ;° a M $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $242,000 $0 $287,000 $0 $287,001CD M $0 $0 $0 $241,000 $1,370,000 $0 $1,611,000 $0 O $1,611,001 LO O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,428,000 $1,428,001 a LL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,672,000 $18,672,001 L) c $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,630,000 $3,630,001 a U $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $758,000 $758,0010 N $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $1,060,0010 N $30,280 $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,560 $0 N $60,561 r $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $375,001 c L O $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 $1,572,000 $1,856,000 $0 $1,856,001 $0 $0 $0 $313,000 $1,794,000 $0 $2,107,000 $0 $2,107,001 a $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,054,000 $2,054,001 t $100,000 $0 $0 $625,000 $2,550,000 $0 $3,275,000 $0 $3,275,001 .r a $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $127,000 $1,433,000 $1,677,000 $0 $1,677,006 Packet Pg. 107 TRANSPORTATION 7.B.a PWT-34 80th Ave W Walkway from 188th St SW to $0 $0 ✓ Olympic View Dr PWT-35 218th St SW Walkway from 76th Ave W to 84th $0 $0 ✓ Ave W PWT-36 ✓ Walnut St Walkway from 6th Ave S to 7th Ave S $0 $0 PWT-37 216th St SW Walkway from Hwy 99 to 72nd Ave $0 $0 ✓ W PWT-39 ✓ Citywide Bicycle Improvements Project $10,000 $0 PWT-40 Maplewood Dr Walkway from Main St to 200th St $0 $0 ✓ SW PWT-41 95th PI W Walkway from 224th St SW to 220th St $0 $0 ✓ SW PWT-43 SR-104 & 76th Non -Motorized Transportation $0 $0 ✓ Improvements PWT-45 SR-104 Walkway HAWK to Pine/Pine from SR- $0 $0 ✓ 104 to 9th PWT-46 ✓ 191 st St SW from 80th Ave W to 76th Ave W $0 $0 PWT-47 104th Ave W / Robinhood Ln from 238th St to $0 $0 ✓ 106th Ave W PWT-48 ✓ 80th Ave W from 218th St SW to 220th St SW $0 $0 PWT-49 ✓ 84th Ave W from 188th St SW to 186th St SW $0 $0 PWT-50 ✓ 238th St SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave W $0 $0 PWT-55 ✓ Elm Way Walkway from 8th Ave. S to 9th Ave. S $5,000 $0 PWT-60 Pedestrian Safety Program $20,180 $20,180 PWT-66 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor $0 $0 FERRY RELATED PWT-51 Ferry Storage Improvements from Pine St to $0 $0 ✓ Dayton St ota. E- LL U $0 $511,000 $1,962,000 $0 $2,473,000 $0 $2,473,001 a $0 $280,000 $1,563,000 $0 $1,843,000 $0 $1,843,001 u) d r $0 $308,000 $0 $0 $308,000 $0 $308,001 Z LL $0 $233,000 $0 $0 $233,000 $0 $233,001 ; a M $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,0010 M O $0 $233,000 $233,000 $2,662,000 $3,128,000 $0 $3,128,001 LO O $0 $139,000 $775,000 $0 $914,000 $0 $914,001 a LL $0 $277,000 $1,389,000 $0 $1,666,000 $0 $1,666,00( L) c $0 $0 $0 $3,473,000 $3,473,000 $0 $3,473,001 a U $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $762,000 $762,0010 N $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,192,000 $1,192,0010 N $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $365,000 N $365,001 r $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $369,000 $369,001 c $0 $211,000 $1,234,000 $0 $1,445,000 $0 $1,445,001 Y $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 L O $5,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,360 $0 $40,361 a $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $0 $8,000,001 m E $0 $403,000 $0 $0 $403,000 t a $0 $403,006 Packet Pg. 108 7.B.a TRANSPORTATION U TRAFFIC CALMING PWT-52 Traffic Calming Program $80,650 $80,650 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $233,300 $270,000 a $503,30( y m w TRAFFIC PLA NN►Nr, LL PWT-53 ADA Transition Plan (Right -of -Way) Update $0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $440,00( Q. M PWT-54 Transportation Plan Update $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,00( c M 0 N GL?FFAI CTI?rrT- LO N Green Streets 236th St SW - 84th Ave W to PWT-64 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,710,000 N $3,710,00( Highway 99 a EXPENSE TOTAL $7,853,670 $6,741,710 $12,237,000 $34,063,000 $51,399,000 $44,633,000 $156,927,380 $204,903,000 $361,830,38( v _ M 2025-31 a_ Total o M Federal Grants $1,351,200 $2,507,500 $4,463,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,321,700 $0 $8,321,70( N LO N Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax & Multi -Modal) $168,595 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $168,595 $0 $168,591 N Fund 125 - REET $836,465 $295,200 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 $0 $3,381,665 $0 y $3,381,66! r' Fund 126 - REET $2,037,610 $772,610 $768,000 $1,243,000 $768,000 $18,000 $5,607,220 $270,000 $5,877,221 Fund 421 -Water Utility $212,000 $194,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $406,400 $0 $406,40( y Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $501,000 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $507,500 $0 L $507,50( 0 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $236,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $236,800 $0 $236,80( State Grants $2,486,000 $2,683,000 $2,547,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $27,323,000 $0 $27,323,001 a Traffic Impact Fees $24,000 $198,500 $283,500 $0 $0 $0 $506,000 $0 c $506,001 E Transportation Impact Fees $0 $84,000 $2,295,500 $475,000 $0 $0 $2,854,500 $0 $2,854,501 .r Q Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $1,130,000 $21,595,000 $40,274,000 $44,615,000 $107,614,000 $204,633,000 $312,247,OO1 FUNDING TOTAL $7,853,670 $6,741,710 $12,237,000 $34,063,000 $51,399,000 $44,633,000 $156,927,380 $204,903, Packet Pg. 109 PWT-01 ANNUAL STREET PRESERVATION PROGRAM Benefit Description w Maintains the City's pavement infrastructure and reduces the need for larger capital investment to rebuild City steets. L) Annual pavement preservation program to maintain City streets. Estimated Project Cost $1,800,000 (2025) Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Design $110,000 $110,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 Construction $1,691,800 $745,400 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Expense Total $1,801,800 $855,400 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 Fund 125 - REET $732,500 $295,200 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 Fund 126 - REET $732,500 $377,800 $750,000 $750,000 $750,000 Fund 421 - Water Utility $200,000 $182,400 $0 $0 $0 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $136,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 Funding Source Total $1,801,800 $855,400 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 $2,630,000 2030 2031-45 CL m $0 $0 0 M $0 $0 O Ln N $0 $0 CD N $0 $0 a. $0 $0 $0 $0 _ a $0 $0 c $0 $0 M 0 N $0 $0 LO c N N d a Packet Pg. 110 PWT-04 >- L'LLL iJ MAIN ST OVERLAY _ FROM 6TH AVE TO 8TH AVE MAdiNFSiT z 0 2 z j DAVTON 5T � Benefit Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and bike safety on this segment of Main Street. Description The project will provide a full -width grind and pavement overlay of Main St. from 6th i Ave to 8th Ave. This project also includes upgrading all non -compliant ADA pedestri; curb ramps within the project limits, an eastbound bike lane and westbound bike sharrow markings. Estimated Project Cost $1,700,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Construction $642,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $642,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 125 - REET $84,820 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Federal Grants $557,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $642,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45LO N $0 0 N $0 a U_ $0 v _ $0 a_ $0 U 0 M O N LO N O N N d Packet Pg. 111 1 r PWT-05 oQ PUGET DR a@ OVD Z p''P� ��``� �r/woo � i� Sr .2 Excelsior PI__ i t17 Q Q�� T - ■ SIGNAL UPGRADES o�� -Sao Puget a` PUGET DR ■ > 2 a Puget Way uJ U _ T > * Edmonds d a Elementary J Benefit This upgrade will provide safer roadway conditions since the hanging signal heads wil be replaced with fixed signal heads on mast arms. The new vehicle detection will guarantee that all vehicles will be detected. Description The project will rebuild the existing traffic signal and remove the signal heads currentl, on span wire and install standard traffic signal poles with mast arms. Vehicle detentioi will also be upgraded as part of this project. Estimated Project Cost $621,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $526,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $526,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $526,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $526,000 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 112 PWT-06 SIGNAL UPGRADES - 100TH AVE @ 238TH ST SW oS 3 w a � �la N 2 I o bw 238th St SW 3 ' a I E y ��Q j♦ with c �— e •ommunity ¢ 2381h St SW � .« hurch Q I r / Benefit The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life. Description Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system. Estimated Project Cost $995,000 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 Design $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $175,000 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $820,000 $0 $0 $820,000 $0 $0 $820,000 $0 $0 $820,000 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 113 1 PWT-07 MAIN ST a@ 3RD SIGNAL UPGRADES Bra cketts P: Post Landing 2a South �o Office Railroad Station arT Q � Edmonds Po £ AJ S and Municil f a Court f �P Mini Park • 1 Edmonds Centennialnial PPI z 4 4 City Hall Plaza Q £ QQ < Fountain f MANS1 / £ Benefit The existing traffic signal is near the end of its anticipated service life. Description Install new traffic signal and vehicle detection system. Estimated Project Cost $523,000 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $406,000 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $406,000 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $406,000 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $406,000 $0 2031-45 Q $0 U O $0 N $0 LO N O $0 a $0 U- U _ a_ U O M O N LO N O N N d Packet Pg. 114 1 PWT-61 OLYMPIC VIEW DR OVERLAY - 196TH / SR- 524 TO TALBOT RD Benefit Improve pavement condition and improve accessibility for pedestrians of all abilities Description Pavement overlay along Olympic View Dr, from 196th St. SW / SR-524 to Talbot Roa( along with ADA pedestrian curb ramp upgrades. Estimated Project Cost $1,500,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 Design $100,000 $15,000 Construction $384,000 $948,700 Expense Total $484,000 $963,700 Fund 126 - REET $484,000 $263,700 Federal Grants $0 $700,000 Funding Source Total $484,000 $963,700 2027 2028 2029 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45 Fu $0 0 M O $0 N LO $0 N 0 N $0 a u- $0 U $0 = a_ U 0 M O N Ln N O N N d Packet Pg. 115 1 PWT-68 88TH AVENUE OVERLAY AND SIDEWALK REPAIR Benefit Improve pavement conditions, pedestrian accessibility (with ADA curb ramps) and pedestrian safety. Description This project will resurface 88th Ave and improve the existing asphalt sidewalk on the f° east side of 88th Ave from 196th St SW to 185th PI SW in the Seaview neighborhood uo-- All City utilities along this section of 88th Ave have been upgraded in recent years an( v the street is ready to pave. The existing curb is in poor condition and varies in height. o The project will install 6" concrete vertical curbs and repave the existing asphalt a sidewalk. a Estimated Project Cost $1,180,000 0 Li 'includes prior year expenditures Q U Budget 0 N Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 ICE 0 Design $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 N a Construction $1,070,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 v Expense Total $1,180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a Fund 126 - REET $585,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $495,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 c Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 to Funding Source Total $1,180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 N N M W D M L 2Q 7 a r m E a Packet Pg. 116 1 SAFETY/ CAPACITY ANALYSI XA- �A y is �'�►.�'E� ��'�e1 1 ;tp 1� NNW • � �,`�� tea; , ��,\ `1, , � �F4 Em � n .sue - - 1 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Packet .g C:YCKANt_r PWT-08 224th 5[ SW 224th St SW 224th SI SW �224th St -SW m 224th PISW ' 228TH ST SW FROM a 2 3 a 226th St SW 226[h St SWa ai±w =_ P y m HWY 99 O 95 T TH PL W i sw�� o n s v CORRIDOR 3 3 3 228TH ST CFO _ ,� • l • p 2291h St g� 3 ,G 230Ih S[ sw 230th .. �P• • t .t ��ss!4'"•+ '� � —23ist st. sw m m¢ ¢` Benefit This project would improve active transportation safety and traffic flows along this corridor. Community Transit will evaluate the possibility of creating a new east -west bt route along 228th St. SW, if this project moves forward (connecting Edmonds Transit Station to Mountlake Terrace Transit Station). Description Widen 228th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 95th PI. W to three lanes (with center two-way IE turn lane), with curb and gutter, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Estimated Project Cost $18,083,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $0 $0 $0 $1,533,000 $1,590,000 $0 Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,900,000 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $1,533,000 $2,650,000 $13,900,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $1,533,000 $2,650,000 $13,900,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $1,533,000 $2,650,000 $13,900,000 2031-45 `o" N_ $0 a $0 v $0 $0 a U $0 0 M O N $0 LO N O N N d a Packet Pg. 118 1 PWT-09 N N 8OW�o �Q' 212TH SS SW > HWY 99 a �� M x S o 3 m Z - 3 3 220TH ST SW REVITALIZATION & a a 3 GATEWAY PROJECT - �P Pia 3 228TH S3 SW N = 3 o ��� < ¢ F STAGE 2 3 N = v'—�'- 236TH ST W * 244TH - 2.TM 11TSW - Benefit The conversion of the center two-way left turn lane to a landscaped raised median will improve corridor safety along this Highway of Regional Significance (HRS), with an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of - 35,000 vehicles per day. The new HAWK signal will provide a signalized pedestrian crossing between the existing traffic signals at 238th and 228th St. Description In 2023, the project constructed landscaped center medians on Highway 99 from 2441 St. SW to 212th St. SW, a HAWK signal - 600' north of 234th St. SW, and gateway signs on both ends of the corridor. Plant establishment was completed in 2024. The project close-out will be completed in 2025. Estimated Project Cost $9,400,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Construction $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 State Grants $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a u_ 2031-45 U $0 $0 a U $0 0 M O N $0 LO N O N N d a Packet Pg. 119 1 PWT-10 / HWY 99 anssw a =,sw f U REVITALIZATION n r� w o«= sw 0 PROJECT - STAGE 3 w E O L Q E w+ Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience along this segment of the Hwy 99 corridor. C-) Description The Stage 3 Highway 99 project limits are from 244th St SW to 238th St. SW. The f° project will provide new sidewalk, landscaped planter strips, street lighting, separated uo-- bike lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with v potential undergrounding of overhead utility lines). The project will also widen the o intersection of Highway 99 and 238th St. SW to provide a second northbound left turn - lane widen 238th St. from Highway 99 to 84th Ave. a� Estimated Project Cost $27,500,000 L) Li 'includes prior year expenditures Q U Budget 0 N Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 LO 0 Design $1,100,000 $799,000 $257,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 N a Right of Way $884,000 $884,000 $2,232,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 U Construction $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0 a Expense Total $1,984,000 $1,683,000 $2,489,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0 State Grants $1,984,000 $1,683,000 $2,489,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0 c Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LO Funding Source Total $1,984,000 $1,683,000 $2,489,000 $10,000,000 $9,607,000 $0 $0 N N M a� M L 2Q 7 a r m E a Packet Pg. 120 1 PWT-11 HWY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 4 220th St SW 0 3�(a 229th 5[SW —th St SW Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved. Description The Stage 4 Highway 99 project limits are from 224th St SW to 220th St. SW. The project will provide new sidewalk, landscaped planter strips, street lighting, separated bike lanes, ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps and utility improvements (with potential undergrounding of overhead utility lines). The project will also widen the intersection of Highway 99 and 220th St. SW to provide a second left turn lane for the northbound, southbound, and westbound movements. Estimated Project Cost $37,000,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget b Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $825,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $475,000 $0 $0 Right of Way $0 $620,000 $4,000,000 $4,480,000 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,100,000 $10,000,000 Expense Total $825,000 $1,620,000 $5,000,000 $4,955,000 $13,100,000 $10,000,000 Transportation Impact Fees $0 $84,000 $2,295,500 $475,000 $0 $0 Federal Grants $338,000 $536,000 $2,646,500 $0 $0 $0 State Grants $487,000 $1,000,000 $58,000 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $4,480,000 $13,100,000 $10,000,000 Funding Source Total $825,000 $1,620,000 $5,000,000 $4,955,000 $13,100,000 $10,000,000 2031-45 a $0 U- U $0 _ $0 a_ U $0 0 M $0 O N (14 LO $0 N $0 $0 D $0 L 2Q 7 a r m E a Packet Pg. 121 1 PWT-12 HWY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 5 215th St SW - L -273th PI SV. Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development will be improved along the corridor. Description Along Hwy 99 from 216th St SW to 212th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip of both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Estimated Project Cost $49,700,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $1,060,000 $1,590,000 $1,689,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $4,188,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,416,000 $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $1,060,000 $2,090,000 $46,293,000 $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $1,060,000 $2,090,000 $46,293,000 $0 $0 $0 $530,000 $1,060,000 $2,090,000 $46,293,000 Packet Pg. 122 PWT-13 HWY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 6 s a Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Description Along Hwy 99 from 238th St. SW to 234th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip c i both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Estimated Project Cost $22,500,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design, ROW, and Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 ;�; $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 N $22,500,000 N a $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000 v $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,500,000 0 M O N LO N O N N d APITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS PWT-14 HWY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 7 t�-rtKANk-t ' 0■' 228TH ST SW,_ iF 229th St sw � 1 1' r • 11 230th " 3 3in St SWIL A�— 3 aisr s=sw�a 3■ter .:�a ■w-y� �I14wwL,A 17rr � — — HoIIY �� z r• . y y� Hr"4L V.�+ ,u9s1 _ _Maplee=Ln 1 ,�■ 1 *N -m s'e Q w ~ J a O Y z J O z Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Description Along Hwy 99 from 234th St. SW to 228th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip c both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Estimated Project Cost $42,900,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design, ROW, and Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,900,000 Packet Pg. 124 PWT-15 HWY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 8 V _ Q EDMoft�t /�WQ tAOUNTLAKET 7 6 V * 0 226TH PL S Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Description Along Hwy 99 from 228th St. SW to 224th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip c both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Estimated Project Cost $37,500,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design, ROW, and Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total s � i zzr P'W a _ 226th St SW 5 � -- r L q � 1 - � L 3P 228TH ST SW-0 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $37,500,000 Packet Pg. 125 �w PWT-16 216th St SW HWY 99 REVITALIZATION PROJECT - STAGE 9 220th St SW Benefit Improve aesthetics, safety, and user experience. In addition, future economic development would be improved along the corridor. Description Along Hwy 99 from approximately 500 feet north of 220th St. SW to 216th St. SW, the project will add a planter strip on both sides of the street, new street lighting, better stormwater management, targeted utility replacements, potential undergrounding of overhead utilities, landscaping and other softscape treatments to identify the area as being in Edmonds. Estimated Project Cost $22,500,000 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design, ROW, and $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45 `o" N $22,500,000 a U- U $22,500,000 $22,500,000 a U $22,500,000 M 0 N LO N 0 N N d I� a Packet Pg. 126 1 PWT-17 196TH ST SW / 88TH AVE W- INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 196th St SW PU D .OSub G Station 0<51 Maplewood O� Hill Park Seventh Day Adventist iq Church • 196TH ST SW W Q 2 f— W 00 zbmhd= Benefit Improve traffic flow characteristics and safety at the intersection. The improvement would modify LOS to A, but increase the delay along 196th St. SW. Description Install traffic signal at the intersection of 196th St. SW @ 88th Ave. W. The modeling i the 2009 Transportation Plan indicated that restricting northbound and southbound traffic to right -turn -only (prohibiting left -turn and through movements) would also address the deficiency identified at this location through 2025. This is same alternative as one concluded by consultant in 2007 study but not recommended by City Council. This could be implemented as an alternate solution, or as an interim solution until trafi signal warrants are met. The existing LOS is F (below City Standards: LOS D). This project was ranked #6 in the Roadway Project Priority in the 2015 Transportation Plar Estimated Project Cost $1,366,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget U_ U Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $0 $0 $0 $279,000 $0 $0 $0 2 Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $252,000 $0 $0 M Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $835,000 0 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $279,000 $252,000 $835,000 LO $0 N Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $279,000 $252,000 $835,000 $0 a Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $279,000 $252,000 $835,000 $0 L 2Q 7 a 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS PWT-18 IF 910111INi i�>�i�. 1 Z s ■sue aBell St Rol Q Bell St Bel MAIN ST @ 9TH AVE INTERSECTION 0 ,�•,-_ IMPROVEMENTS MAIN ST 48, Anderson to Center LU Field > � Yost Park < Q Dayton St F— O Benefit The existing intersection is stop -controlled for all approaches and the projected intersection LOS in 2035 is LOS F (below the City's concurrency standards: LOS D). The installation of a traffic signal would improve the intersection delay to LOS B. Description Installation of a traffic signal or mini -roundabout. The project ranked #4 in the Roadway Project Priority of the 2015 Transportation Plan. The preliminary cost estimate for a new traffic signal is $1,290,000. A conceptual cost estimate for a mini - roundabout is $500,000. Estimated Project Cost $1,367,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget r Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $0 $0 $0 $210,000 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,157,000 $0 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $210,000 $1,157,000 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $210,000 $1,157,000 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $210,000 $1,157,000 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 128 PWT-19 — a z,9th St sW 76TH AVE W @ 220TH m ■■ STSW- N 21919 STARBUCK! INTERSECTION T* T S W • 3,' 3 a a * * W1110 ! < IMPROVEMENTS, ,�� � ■ ,• 7514 � ti � s ■ ESPERANCE 221st PI s LYNWOOD / Benefit Reduce the intersection delay and improve the LOS. The projected LOS in 2050 woull be improved from LOS F to LOS D. Improve active transportation conditions for pedestrians and bicycle riders. Description Reconfigure eastbound lanes to a left turn lane and through/ right turn lane. Add eastbound and westbound dedicated left turn lanes with a protected -permitted phase. Provide right turn overlap for westbound movement during southbound left turn phase Additional improvements include wider sidewalk, bike lanes, street lighting, and variOL utility improvements (including potential conversion overhead utility lines to underground). ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY #1 in 2015 Transportation Plan . Estimated Project Cost $11,000,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget N Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 a- Design $198,000 $253,500 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right of Way $0 $1,235,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 c $0 a Construction $0 $0 $0 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0 $0 Expense Total $198,000 $1,488,500 $2,100,000 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0 0 $0 N Traffic Impact Fees $24,000 $198,500 $283,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 c Fund 421 - Water Utility $12,000 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 N Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $6,000 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 a� $0 Federal Grants $156,000 $1,271,500 $1,816,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $198,000 $1,488,500 $2,100,000 $3,370,000 $3,300,000 $0 $0 0 a 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS PWT-20 SR-104 ADAPTIVE SYSTEM - 236TH TO 226TH a l90 q„/ v 226th St SW ` T5h St 9/ym. 228th 't 731 �t St t. 0 0 �tl""ha Rd' Z �35th PI SW °Q CO C LU W 3 v 2261h 228TH ST SW.: y n s _ o ?o w ,30th > W £23t s�e w�-.2315[-SI-SW' = '232nd St SW 2 H Holly Ln Maple L,, 3 234th SI SW II — Madr . Ln m ° 236th St - Benefit Improve traffic flows along this regional corridor with a current Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of — 25,000 vehicles per day. Description The project will add a traffic signal adaptive system on a 1.25-mile segment of SR104 from 236th St to 226th St. The system will monitor and synchronize the timing of five existing signalized intersections (SR104 @ 236th St, SR104 @ 232nd St, SR104 @ 95th PI, SR104 @ 100th Ave, SR104 @ 226th St) and improve traffic flows along SR104. Estimated Project Cost $4,000,000 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax & Multi -Modal) Fund 125 - REET Fund 126 - REET Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $67,740 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,515,000 $0 $0 $0 $67,740 $0 $0 $3,515,000 $0 $0 $0 $58,595 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,145 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,040,000 $0 $0 $0 $67,740 $0 $0 $3,515,000 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 130 PWT-21 SR-104 a@ 100TH AVE W INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS QI PCC NATURAL MARKET �'Q u Oy x s w BANK Q ' O BARTELL'S O - 76 G WALGREEN'S PARKING BANK EDMONDS WAY IVAR'S Benefit Improve access and safety at the intersection and improve active transportation safety Description Implement Westgate Circulation Access Plan, install mid -block pedestrian crossing along 100th Ave. W, improve safety to access the driveways within proximity to the intersection, and re -striping of 100th Ave. W with the potential addition of bike lanes. This project was identified in the SR-104 Completed Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). Estimated Project Cost $4,200,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $250,000 $0 $0 Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,650,000 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,350,000 $2,650,000 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,350,000 $2,650,000 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $1,350,000 $2,650,000 $0 Packet Pg. 131 PWT-22 SR-104 a@ 95TH PL W INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS 227th p/ S� 3 an US 228th St SW 228TH ST SW — o `y P Z o� w �V Westgate ON Chapel ww s PUD / Sub Station 1 Benefit Improve intersection safety for pedestrians and vehicles. Description Upgrade all ADA Curb Ramps; and add C-Curb for access management. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Streets Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). L c Estimated Project Cost $287,000 ; 1 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $242,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $242,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $242,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $242,000 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 132 PWT-23 SR-104 a@ 238TH ST SW INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ■ Ir lei r a 3 zssth St sw 38TH ST SW3 Korean Presbyter) Church Benefit Improve vehicular and pedestrian safety. Description Install traffic signal. This project was identified in the SR-104 Complete Street Corridc Analysis (completed in 2015). Estimated Project Cost $1,611,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 Design $0 $0 $0 $241,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $241,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $241,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $241,000 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $1,370,000 $0 $0 $1,370,000 $0 $0 $1,370,000 $0 $0 $1,370,000 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 133 PWT-24 OLYMPIC VIEW DR a@ 76TH AVE W INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS view P`;� Post Office 784th PI S� LLJ 185th PI SW ) Q OLYMPIC VIEwOR Lynndale Park Benefit The improvement will reduce the intersection delay. The projected Level of Service is LOS F in 2035, which is below the City's concurrency standards (LOS D). The project will improve the Level of Service to LOS B. Description Install traffic signal (the intersection currently stop controlled for all movements). (ROADWAY ROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #11). Estimated Project Cost $1,428,000 "includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 Design $0 Right of Way $0 Construction $0 Expense Total $0 Unsecured Funding $0 Funding Source Total $0 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45 c $244,000 O $0 `= $1,184,000 v $1,428,000 $1,428,000 a $1,428,000 c M O N LO N O N N d t tv IL Packet Pg. 134 1 PWT-25 _ h y 212TH ST SW � 84TH AVE W (212TH ST M :w z ''a Z SW TO 238TH ST SW) - 220TH ST SM PpE a a = a > 03 P�228TH ST SW q 228TH ST a 3�° Obi w 236TH ST Benefit Improve traffic flow, access and active transportation uses by installing a center two way left turn lane, sidewalks, bike lanes and street lighting. Description Widen 84th Ave. W to (3) lanes with curb, gutter, bike lanes, and sidewalk on each sic of the street. (part of this project was ranked #6 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). Estimated Project Cost $18,672,000 "includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,380,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,292,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,672,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,672,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,672,000 Packet Pg. 135 PWT-26 SR-104 a@ 76TH AVE W INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS FoM olo FoM �1), 'VA N 205TH c N 204TH PL 3 Seattle W 243rd PI SW Baptist > Church Q 4TH PL Lake Ballinger C7 I i Ga N 202� G! l G f Benefit Improve access, safety and delay at the intersection IL Description Add a second westbound left turn lane along SR-104. This project was identified in & SR-104 Complete Street Corridor Analysis (completed in 2015). c u C Estimated Project Cost $3,630,000 s c Includes prior year expenditures p Budget Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $541,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,089,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,630,000 Packet Pg. 136 PWT-27 Qc •! � � as >3rd St SW I OLYMPIC VIEW `'9 DR UCH °0WDALEBEgCN • U 174TH ST SW 773rdPIS�W �° M INTERSECTION =oa 174th St SW 174111 St SV,' C L a IMPROVEMENTS v St. Thomas �t Moore School E d E w+ Benefit Improve intersection efficiency and safety of drivers accessing either street. U _ Description Widen Olympic View Dr. to add a northbound left turn lane for 50' storage length. Shif a the northbound lanes to the east to provide an acceleration lane for eastbound left U- turns. Install traffic signal to increase the LOS and reduce intersection delay. L) (ROADWAY PROJECT PRIORITY in 2015 Transportation Plan: #13) o a Estimated Project Cost $758,000 "includes prior year expenditures U- Budget CL Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 O 0 Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,000 N Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 O Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $631,000 v Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $758,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $758,000 a Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $758,000 0 M O N LO N O N N d D _ M N Y L 2Q 7 a r m E 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTV Packet Pg. 137 PWT-28 175TH ST SW SLOPE REPAIR Benefit Repair roadway and stabilize slope embankment. Description The project will stabilize the roadway subgrade and embankment and rebuild the damaged pavement on 175th St. SW. Estimated Project Cost $1,060,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2028 2029 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $0 $1,060,000 $0 $0 2031-45 a $0 U O $0 0 N $0 `n N O $0 $0 a u_ U $0 _ a_ U O M O N LO N O N N d Packet Pg. 138 1 PWT-59 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROGRAM Benefit Improve reliability of traffic signal operation. Description This program started in 2019 and will provide new signal upgrades, such as vehicle detection at intersections, new vehicle/pedestrian head equipment and other signal - related upgrades. These improvements will improve the safety of the City's transportation system. Estimated Project Cost $30,280 *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Fund 126 - REET Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,280 $29,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,280 $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,280 $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,280 $30,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 139 PWT-70 SAFETY ACTION PLAN Benefit Complete this document so safety projects for all modes of transportation can be completed (by securing future grants). Description A comprehensive safety plan aimed at reducing and eliminating serious -injury and fat, crashes affecting all roadway users. In order to qualify for future Infrastructure Implementation Grant or Planning / Demonstration Grant (through Safe Streets for All SS4A0, the projec needs to be identified in this plan. i Estimated Project Cost $375,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Expense Total Federal Grants Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax & Multi -Modal) Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45LO N $0 0 N $0 a U_ $0 U _ $0 a_ U $0 0 N LO N 0 N N d Packet Pg. 140 1 NON -MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATIO m 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS��� PWT-29 232ND ST SW WALKWAY FROM 100TH AVE TO SR-104 Benefit Description This project would improve pedestrian safety. 1 I NO a: A� ri Install sidewalk along 232nd St. SW from 100th Ave. W to SR-104. This project ranke #3 in the Long Walkway List of 2015 Transportation Plan. Estimated Project Cost $1,856,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 2030 $0 $1,572,000 $1,572,000 $1,572,000 $1,572,000 2031-45 a $0 U O $0 0 N $0 `n N O $0 $0 a v_ U _ a_ U O M O N LO N O N N d Packet Pg. 142 1 PWT-30 236TH ST SW WALKWAY FROM MADRONA ELEM TO 97TH AVE W 234th 235th St SW _s alb L ,W Woodway Elementary Madrona 236th St SJ f r Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Description Install sidewalk with curb and gutter along 236nd St. SW from Madrona Elementary tc 97th Ave. W. This project ranked #4 in Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation c Plan. c s Estimated Project Cost $2,107,000 c 'includes prior year expenditures i Budget r Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $313,000 $0 $0 $0 < $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,794,000 $0 $0 ; $0 $0 $0 $313,000 $1,794,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $313,000 $1,794,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $313,000 $1,794,000 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 143 PWT-31 236TH ST SW WALKWAY FROM HWY 99 TO 76TH AVE W q UJ r 2A' th t SW VIr M I Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Description Install sidewalk along 236th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Estimated Project Cost $2,054,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Right of Way Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $293,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,761,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,054,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,054,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,054,000 Packet Pg. 144 PWT-32 84T H AVE W WALKWAY FROM 238TH ST SW TO 234TH ST SW _ r ti �7�Y1�'7rr1�r. • ! i3 Mad— Ln y i -, - t��e�su�1 � a =RON ti f s. 236t6 ' O �Q N LE1f0 p Aa SPLr �Nts WA 1 9901 - ER 7B u Q C E G A H PARK EDMONDS gA�� APTS m Christ Lutheran -° TL—ERAN Church n CHURCH C a m Park and Ride 2 6o6cicE v 3� �oNNT 236th St SWS 23601 q �� 23603 SAE B f3fi05 L NJIHGHG f �F 23fi0] M-N SUNSET 23619 O R NaoN q AURORA z� u g MARKETPLACE 3/ot = T L U FAMILY INIAKI J V - 238TH ST Sl 23eth St SW: / SEOUL Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Description The walkway project proposed approximately 1,000 LF of new sidewalk on the east side of 84th Ave W with ADA compliant pedestrian curb ramps. Estimated Project Cost $3,325,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design ROW Construction Expense Total Fund 126 - REET Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 $100,000 $0 $0 $296,000 $0 $0 $0 $329,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $625,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $625,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $625,000 2029 $0 $0 $2,550,000 $2,550,000 $0 $2,550,000 $2,550,000 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 U O $0 0 N $0 `n N O $0 $0 a U $0 c $0 a_ U O M O N in N O N N d _ N Y L Q c.i IL a� E a Packet Pg. 145 1 PWT-33 BOTH AVE W WALKWAY FROM 212TH ST SW TO 206TH ST SW 206th St SW_a m207,n s' MAIN ST SW 5 � m 212TH ST SW LYNNWOOD208TH ST EDMONDS 3 3 Benefit The improvements will improve active transportation safety (including for school kids due to proximity of several schools). Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 206th St. SW to 212th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Estimated Project Cost $1,677,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $127,000 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,433,000 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $127,000 $1,433,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $127,000 $1,433,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $127,000 $1,433,000 2031-45 c M $0 N $0 N O N_ $0 a $0 v $0 _ a_ U 0 M O N In N O N N d a Packet Pg. 146 1 PWT-34 80TH AVE W WALKWAY FROM 188TH ST SW TO OLYMPIC VIEW DR Benefit Description i J0 vMP�� This project would improve pedestrian safety. F�41ON9h o LYNNWOOD Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to OVD. This project ranked #1 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Estimated Project Cost $2,473,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Design $0 $0 $0 $511,000 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,962,000 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $511,000 $1,962,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $511,000 $1,962,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $511,000 $1,962,000 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45 a M$0 V 0 $0 0 N $0 Ln N O $0 $0 a u_ t� M a v 0 M O N LO N O N N d a� E a Packet Pg. 147 PWT-35 218TH ST SW WALKWAY FROM 76TH AVE W TO 84TH AVE W Edmonds Woodway High School Swe� 3 3�, Edmc C LLJ 3 218th S y a � y s s ^ ^ ^ 219th S' _ `� 219th St SW 'IT00 a 3 i n ��Edmonds ESPERANCE ChurchofGod_- 220TH ST SW ^ ( r Benefit The improvements will improve pedestrian safety. Description Install sidewalk along 218th St. SW from 76th Ave. W to 84th Ave. W with curb and gutter. This project ranked #2 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. c u C Estimated Project Cost $1,843,000 s ( Includes prior year expenditures p Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total a r nChase Lake � School W 3 w N 6 > ° qve W Q � 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,563,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $1,563,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $1,563,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $1,563,000 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 148 PWT-36 WALNUT ST WALKWAY FROM 6TH AVE S TO 7TH AVE S THE MARINER Alder St C/w� ■i*� BECKS COMMODORE v y� �. , : . aw r y Walnut St a� ■�� v a GREGORY Ste Holly Dr t lira~ Nigel Cedar St Benefit This project will improve pedestrian safety along this stretch. Description Install sidewalk on the south side of Walnut St. from 6th Ave. S to 7th Ave. S. This project is ranked #9 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). Estimated Project Cost $308,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $53,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $255,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $308,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $308,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $308,000 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 149 PWT-37 kEGIS 216TH ST SWSTEVENSWALKWAY FROM HWY COURT VALUESwedish VILL99 TO 72ND AVE W Edmonds 216th St SW �� 210h St SW EDMONDS � q � / MEDICAL Op RP 21605 PAVILION KRUGER S1O�C�` CLINIC `� y EN'S TH �� ER 0 Benefit To provide a safe and desirable walking route. Description Install 150' sidewalk on north side of 216th St. SW from Hwy. 99 to 72nd Ave. W (completing a missing link on north side of 216th St. SW). This project is ranked #3 in the Short Walkway List (from 2015 Transportation Plan). Estimated Project Cost $233,000 'includes prior year expenditures Budget r Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $198,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 150 PWT-39 CITYWIDE BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT w Benefit This project will create new bike connections to various destination points throughout the City (such as schools, parks, Downtown, Sound Transit Station). Sound Transit U awarded the grant to fund improvements that will provide more convenient access so c that more people can use Sound Transit services. f° a u_ U c Description The project will add bike lanes or sharrows on the following streets: a. • 100th Ave/9th Ave from 244th St to Walnut St a • Walnut/Bowdoin Way from 9th Ave to 84th Ave • 228th St. from 76th Ave to 80th Ave M • Bike sharrows on 80th Ave from 228th St. to 220th St. Pedestrian crossing improvements including curb ramps, rectangular rapid flashing a beacons (RRFB) and signing will be installed at 100th Ave & 224th St, 9th Ave & Pine 0 St, Bowdoin Way& 96th Ave and Bowdoin Way & Pioneer Way. The project is current M in the construction phase and completion will be subject to available weather in Fall N 2023. Staff assumes grant funds will be spent in 2023. Project close-out is scheduled N for 2025. N Estimated Project Cost $2,800,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 125 - REET $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 151 PWT-40 CASPERS ST --- h 001h75t MAPLEWOOD DR �Mo�ntaln�n� VlstePl — N a s3 � WALKWAY FROM MAIN o she S[ Z Carol Way ` a terra PI � w v cos 13 m '202nd St SW. dPISN _ m a ST TO 200TH ST SW S Glm St O2°°� °aley sta - .,i .. Sprague St .}.i O o FIN N\9r�ynd 3 - �� s Q - J �.205th PI SW Ed zon ds St I Edmmds St Edmonds Sl a a Bell St -- _ Bell St Eme.a1°5%ll-0� = 20��h PI SW 207m St' MAIN ST Benefit Create pedestrian connection between Maplewood Elementary School on 200th St. S' and Main St., by encouraging kids to use non -motorized transportation to walk to / fror school. Description Construct sidewalk on Maplewood Dr. from Main St. to 200th St. SW (- 2,700'). A sidewalk currently exists on 200th St. SW from Main St. to 76th Ave. W, adjacent to Maplewood Elementary School (rated #18 in the Long Walkway list of the 2015 Transportation Plan). Estimated Project Cost $3,128,000 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $233,000 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,662,000 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $233,000 $2,662,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $233,000 $2,662,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $233,000 $2,662,000 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 152 PWT-41 95TH PL W WALKWAY FROM 224TH ST SW TO 220TH ST SW 0000011"�� .a -�`+ 0 ! t. a `mil m.'�s TH ST SW ^ � F V 0OZZc� J C LU o �` sN �, 5� WLn 271s W Ai L L 211 s 5 sl O d '- zzai, s' sw _ CL E Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Description Install sidewalk along 95th PI. W from 224th St. SW to 220th St. SW with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation PI, Estimated Project Cost $914,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 $0 $0 $0 $139,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $139,000 $0 $0 $0 $139,000 $0 $0 $0 $139,000 2029 $0 $775,000 $775,000 $775,000 $775,000 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 M 0 $0 N LO N $0 CD $0 a LL $0 U a_ U 0 M O N LO N O N N d D _ LO N L O c.i a. a� E a Packet Pg. 153 PWT-43 SR-104 & 76TH NON - MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS S a a Seattle 3 243 rd P I SW Baptist ; FQ� Church Q otio MoNos 146201M.l �T1111h Z N 204TH PL P ?O4TH PL �LL Z Z� Q V 2p3Rp p� Lake Ballinger Benefit Improve active transportation safety along this section of the Interurban Trail and acro SR-104. Description Extend bike lanes within proximity of the intersection in northbound and southbound directions. Install APS on all corners and new ADA curb ramps. Estimated Project Cost $1,666,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $0 $0 $0 $277,000 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,389,000 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $277,000 $1,389,000 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $277,000 $1,389,000 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $277,000 $1,389,000 $0 2031-45 Fu $0 0 M O $0 N $0 N 0 N $0 a LL $0 U �a a_ U 0 M O N LO N O N N d Packet Pg. 154 PWT-45 SR-104 WALKWAY HAWK TO PINE/PINE FROM SR-104 TO 9TH edmonds Marsh a 3 z 0 0 w Benefit This project will improve pedestrian connectivity between the residential areas along 3rd Ave. S to Downtown Edmonds and City Park. Description Installation of sidewalk with ADA curb ramps along SR-104 from the HAWK signal to Pine St and along Pine St from SR-104 to 9th Ave S Estimated Project Cost $3,473,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $579,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,894,000 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,473,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,473,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,473,000 2031-45 c M $0 N $0 C4 N O N_ $0 a $0 v $0 _ a_ U 0 M O N LO N O N N d Packet Pg. 155 1 PWT-46 191 ST ST SW FROM 80TH AVE W TO 76TH AVE W Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. r Description Install sidewalk along 191th St. SW from 80th Ave. W to 76th Ave., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #8 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan Estimated Project Cost $762,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design, ROW, and Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $762,000 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $762,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $762,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $762,000 Packet Pg. 156 PWT-47 104TH AVE W / ROBINHOOD LN FROM 238TH ST TO 106TH AVE W Scriber I High Scl Hickman Park Edmonds Faith Memorial Community Salem Edmonds Lutheran 11 Heights Church K-12 �(( 34th f 3 fo z6�PJSW a f Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Description Install sidewalk along 104th Ave. W from 238th ST. SW to 106th Ave. W, with curb an gutter. This project ranked #10 in the Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation c Plan. c s Estimated Project Cost $1,192,000 c 'includes prior year expenditures 11 Budget r Project Cost Design, ROW, and Construction Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,192,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,192,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,192,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,192,000 Packet Pg. 157 PWT-48 80TH AVE W FROM 218TH ST SW TO 220TH ST SW 3 a c . F& I r V., 15 �20TH ST SW Edmonds Church of God 219 r Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Description Install sidewalk along 80th Ave. W from 218th ST. SW to 220th ST. SW, with curb an( gutter. This project ranked #7 in the Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Estimated Project Cost $365,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget 11, Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design, ROW, and $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction Expense Total 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45 $365,000 $365,000 N $365,000 a $365,000 LUL �a a 0 M O N LO N O N N d c.i IL Packet Pg. 158 PWT-49 84T H AVE W FROM 188TH ST SW TO 8 hPI SW 186TH ST SW Benefit Description 86th St SWor _ 187th St SW ` a a r Seaview 1881h St SW / Elementary .. This project would improve pedestrian safety. Install sidewalk along 84th Ave. W from 188th St. SW to 186th St. SW., with curb and gutter. This project ranked #5 in Short Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. Estimated Project Cost $369,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design, ROW, and $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45 $369,000 $369,000 LO N $369,000 N $369,000 ULM t� �a a v 0 M O N LO N O N W d c.i IL Packet Pg. 159 PWT-50 3 3 3 U U J 238TH ST SW FROM ' ■ 2,3&th t SW 3 HWY 99 TO 76TH AVE W s� o � r 3 R 3 3 a L O O o] 240tn sr SW Mathay Ballinger / Park - Benefit This project would improve pedestrian safety. Description Install sidewalk along 238th St. SW from Hwy 99 to 76th Ave. W. This project ranked #10 in Long Walkway List of the 2015 Transportation Plan. o u C Estimated Project Cost $1,445,000 Includes prior year expenditures p Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $0 $0 $0 $211,000 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,234,000 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $211,000 $1,234,000 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $211,000 $1,234,000 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $211,000 $1,234,000 $0 2031-45 a $0 U O $0 0 N $0 `n N O $0 $0 a u_ U _ a_ U O M O N u7 N O N N d a Packet Pg. 160 N I N ziea Vista P\.' 4F JF I PWT-5511 � - 7th and c Aye ° W VL�sta PI > 0. ELM WAY WALKWAY Elm Park , N 220TH E ST SW FROM 8TH AVE. S TO Elm St ay E 9TH AVE. S W w, > 3 3 d a = a a E F- L r d PI O E fC w Benefit The project will improve pedestrian safety and provide a missing link of sidewalk on El Way between 8th Ave and 9th Ave. U Description The walkway project is ranked #6 on the short walkway list from the 2015 U_ Transportation Plan. The project constructed approximately 700 feet of new sidewalk, v six pedestrian curb ramps and modify the existing stormwater system on Elm Way o between 8th Ave. S and 9th Ave. S. Project close-out in 2025. a as Estimated Project Cost $1,000,000 M *includes prior year expenditures LL Q Budget CD M O Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45LO N Construction $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CD N Expense Total $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a. Fund 126 - REET $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 _ a_ U 0 M O N LO N O N N d D _ M N Y L 2Q 7 a r m E 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Packet Pg. 161 PWT-60 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PROGRAM Benefit Improve safety at pedestrian crossings. �- Description This program started in 2019 and will provide pedestrian safety improvements, such e additional signage / stripng, flashing LED's around stop signs, or other improvements. a These improvements will improve the safety of the City's transportation system. U. _ Estimated Project Cost $20,180 a *includes prior year expenditures y v La Budget r Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 CL Design $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 c Construction $19,180 $19,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0Ln Expense Total $20,180 $20,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0CD N Fund 126 - REET $20,180 $20,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $20,180 $20,180 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a_ U O M O N LO N O N N d c.i IL a� E a 325-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJEcTrM0011—A PWT-66 4TH AVENUE CULTURAL CORRIDOR Benefit The corridor improvements in the public right of way will encourage pedestrian traffic and provide a strong visual connection between the ECA and downtown retail. Improvements will enhance connectivity as an attractive walking corridor and contribui to the economic vitality in downtown. The project has been supported by the communi in the 2014 Community Cultural Plan and in the goals and priorities for the State certified Creative District. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Description Final design of 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor to include site design and construction documents for a safe, pedestrian friendly, and art enhanced corridor in the public righ- of way which provides a strong visual connection along 4th Avenue N between Main Street and Edmonds Center for the Arts. Interim work on this project since the concep was developed includes a 2015 temporary light artwork "Luminous Forest", as well as preliminary design development through 2020-21. Funding for this project has not beE secured at this time. The 4th Avenue Cultural Corridor Project is managed by the Community Services/Economic Development Department. Estimated Project Cost $9,206,600 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 $0 Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 $0 Packet Pg. 163 1 IEEEEEL�� PWT-51 FERRY STORAGE IMPROVEMENTS FROM PINE ST TO DAYTON ST � • Davao s� I,'grr�• Of r �� C Edmonds Marsf M! . N Hey D, Howell Way < 3 III Zv Hemlock Way w {_ Benefit Reduce conflicts between ferry storage and access to local driveways. Description Modify existing lane channelization on SR104 to add vehicle storage for ferry users Estimated Project Cost $403,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $0 $0 $0 $61,000 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $342,000 $0 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $403,000 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $403,000 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $403,000 $0 $0 2031-45 •Q $0 U O $0 M 0 N $0 LO N O $0 a $0 u- U _ a_ U O M O N LO N O N N d Packet Pg. 165 1 7.B.a r swl jt ^�xrt� .rM��r r C ys fi > ,,,,,. a �, J3 �� r 1- ✓f s� � a .. y t �B'r``�- x� � � � �,�,�,�''yaQ = AA , I ew Packet Pg. 166 7.B.a PWT-52 TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM Benefit Reduce vehicle speeds on City streets that qualify under the City's Traffic Calming Policy. Description Install traffic calming devices along selected stretches throughout the City with speeding issues (through completion of detailed evaluation). This ongoing annual program started in 2015 and is included in the City's 6-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Estimated Project Cost $80,650 *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $10,000 $10,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Construction $70,650 $70,650 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000 Expense Total $80,650 $80,650 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 Fund 126 - REET $80,650 $80,650 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 Funding Source Total $80,650 $80,650 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 $18,000 2031-45 $15,000 $255,000 $270,000 v $270,000 $270,000 a a 0 M O N Ln N O N N d c.i IL Packet Pg. 167 W' V4 TRAFFIC PLANNINI y � ti.� 1 • t a - .�► < r; �� •tip •� 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PWT-53 ADA TRANSITION PLAN (RIGHT-OF-WAY) UPDATE Benefit Inventories and prioritizes ADA issues in the City right of way, as well as City building: and parks facilities. Description The 2017 Transition Plan completed an ADA evaluation and prioritization of the City's street right-of-way. This decision package will update the 2017 plan and expand the evaluation to include City Buildings and Parks facilities. The Plan will inventory physical barriers preventing accessibility and develop actions and preliminary cost estimates to address ADA non-compliance. Estimated Project Cost $440,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 169 7.B.a PWT-54 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE w Benefit Based upon existing and projected future land use and travel patterns, the Transportation Plan describes roadway pedestrian, bicycle and transit infrastructure L) and services and provides an assessment of existing and projected future c transportation needs. The Plan will establish the transportation priorities and guides th a development of the six -year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Capital U_ Improvement Program (CIP), Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and introduce Multimodal -- Level of Service (MMLOS). o a d 0 M Description The Transportation Plan serves as the transportation element of the City's Comprehensive Plan and is being updated in coordination with the 2024 a Comprehensive Plan Update. The plan was last updated in 2015. The Transportation Plan Update will be completed in Fall 2024. The funding in 2025 v 0 N develop the new multi -modal impact fee and provide staff training on implementing the N program on private development projects. N Estimated Project Cost $406,000 a v *includes prior year expenditures _ a_ U Budget M 0 N Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 N Planning $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 N Total $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2Expense Fund 112 - Street (Gas Tax & $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Multi -Modal) c M Funding Source Total $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 (n L 2Q 7 a r m E U 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS Packet Pg. 170 GREEN STREET; `' .1 `"\ M �! ! •. �� .ram _ .t�. .� 1 M- I. •ems. ��'�1�' � {; r�' •��i+ �� �+ � � � � ' Ll 4 _ I �` ` � ,. �, � , ... � �: -(.* •l. _' `tea �,, t r �.1 • y / Fir► r� ` i T%"�'•� - 4r�� t + � ���. t ' � ,y � ~ /- �t � :•�,_ ��?' Cam, ��''�1 � •, 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS PWT-64 �' %L: rdw GREEN STREETS t 236TH ST SW - 84TH AVE W TO HIGHWAY 99 Benefit Incorporating green streets into the urban fabric of the City of Edmonds is intended to demonstrate how trees, vegetation, engineered green stormwater solutions, physical and visual narrowing of vehicular lane widths, and shortening pedestrian crossings wii curb bulbs help to slow traffic, ameliorate climate change impacts, and reinforce desir( land use and transportation patterns on appropriate street rights -of -way. This project is intended to increase the livability of a diverse, growing city. Description The City of Edmonds proposes the development of this project to demonstrate how green infrastructure can both address stormwater flows and enhance the streetscape: to benefit the Hwy 99 neighborhood and the downtown core. This project includes the following elements: • Roadway narrowing to reduce traffic speeds and to reduce impervious surface (vehicular capacity retained) • Sidewalks and planting strips added • Bioretention cells collect runoff from the road through curb cuts • Bioretention cells collect runoff directly from sidewalks • Public private partnership potential with Housing Hope and Terrace Place developments. Estimated Project Cost $3,710,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $371,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,339,000 Expense Total $0 $0 , $0 $0 $0 $3,710,000 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,710,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $0, $0 $0 $0 $3,710,000 a U- U _ a_ U 0 M O N LO N O N N L Q a m E M U a Packet Pg. 172 1 WAT E Y-, , = Ai i Af 4 Zv f 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 7.B.a WATER PWW-01 Annual Waterline Overlay (2024) PWW-02 2027 Water Comprehensive Plan Update PWW-03 Phase 14 Annual Replacement Program (2024) PWW-04 Phase 15 Annual Replacement Program (2025) PWW-05 Phase 16 Annual Replacement Program (2026) PWW-06 Phase 17 Annual Replacement Program (2027) PWW-07 Phase 18 Annual Replacement Program (2028) PWW-08 Phase 19 Annual Replacement Program (2029) PWW-10 Phase 20 Annual Replacement Program (2030) PWW-11 Yost & Seaview Reservoir Repairs & Upgrades PWW-20 Phase 21 Annual Replacement Program (2031) EXPENSE TOTAL U5 21112b Z121 21126i Total . lotal a U- U $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $0 $500 = c� a $0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 y m w $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $15,000 13 LL $3,576,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,576,100 $0 $3,576,100 Q M $547,000 $3,289,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,836,000 $0 $3,836,000 U 0 M $0 $569,000 $3,966,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,535,000 $0 $4,535,000 0 LO 0 $0 $0 $592,000 $4,124,000 $0 $0 $4,716,000 $0 $4,716,000 v a LL $0 $0 $0 $616,000 $4,289,000 $0 $4,905,000 $0 $4,905,000 U c $0 $0 $0 $0 $641,000 $4,460,000 $5,101,000 $0 $5,101,000 c� a U $4,760,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,610,000 $0 $8,610,000 c N $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $666,000 $666,000 $4,638,000 $5,304,000 c N $8,898,600 $7,858,000 $4,908,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $36,460,600 $4,638,000 $41,098,600 Fund 421 - Water Utility $8,898,600 $7,858,000 $4,908,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $36,460,600 $4,638,000 $41,098,600 FUNDING TOTAL $8,898,600 $7,858,000 $4,908,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $36,460,600 $4,638,000 $41,098,600 Packet Pg. 174 PWW-01 ANNUAL WATERLINE OVERLAY (2024) Benefit Description Estimated Project Cost "includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Construction Expense Total Fund 421 - Water Utility Funding Source Total Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to the Annual Waterline Replacement Projects. Road pavement overlays will cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patched in previous years as part of the Waterline Replacement Projects. $295,000 (2024) 2025 2026 $500 $0 $500 $0 $500 $0 $500 $0 2027 2028 2029 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45 $0 N LO $0 N 0 _ $0 Na $0 v c U 0 M O N LO N O N N d D _ LO N L O c.i IL a� E a Packet Pg. 175 PWW-02 2027 WATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. F" Description The existing water comprehensive plan was last updated in 2017 and is required to bE updated by the State Dept of Health (DOH) every 10 years. This project would be a o comprehensive evaluation of the City's drinking water system, its replacement progral a and its operations and with include recommendations for improvements or adjustment ,a and recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance projects. M U- Estimated Project Cost $500,000° *includes prior year expenditures C U O M Budget O C4 N O Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 V Design $0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 U- Expense Total $0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 421 - Water Utility $0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 a Funding Source Total $0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 U 0 0 N LO N O N N d l� a 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS PWW-03-09 PHASE 14-35 WATER REPLACEMENT PROJECTS (2024-45) Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of breakages and leakage, improve fire flows, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Description Per the approved 2017 Water Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/maintain pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old ag being undersized, need to increase flow or pressure, or more prone to breakage due i its material properties. Estimated Project Cost $4.2 to $9.2 million/year 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $547,000 $569,000 $592,000 $616,000 $641,000 $666,000 $13,873,000 Construction $3,666,000 $3,813,000 $3,966,000 $4,124,000 $4,289,000 $4,460,000 $92,891,000 Expense Total $4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $106,764,000 Fund 421 - Water Utility $4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $106,764,000 Funding Source Total $4,213,000 $4,382,000 $4,558,000 $4,740,000 $4,930,000 $5,126,000 $106,764,000 F" a U- U _ a_ U 0 M O N LO N O N N d _ N Y L 2Q 7 a r m E U a Packet Pg. 177 1 PWW-11 YOST & SEAVIEW RESERVOIR REPAIRS & UPGRADES w Benefit Maintain a high level of drinking water quality, improve overall system reliability, decrease probability of leakage, retrofit structures so that they meet current structural L) codes to improve their resiliency during earthquakes, and decrease overall day to day c maintenance costs. f° a u_ U Description This work is being done to provide structural upgrades, repair leakages, and upgrade., o to our two underground potable water storage reservoirs. Preliminary findings a completed in early 2023 were used to determine order of magnitude/preliminary costs . and next steps for the now planned repairs and upgrades project. The Yost Reservoii report shows that it will need a major structural and seismic retrofit, plus repairs to LL address leakage from the reservoir. The report for the Seaview Reservoir shows - similar issues as the Yost Reservoir, with a less serious leakage issue. a U Estimated Project Cost $9,659,000 CD *includes prior year expenditures 0 N LO N 0 N Budget U- U Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $260,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 Construction $4,500,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 M Expense Total $4,760,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Fund 421 - Water Utility $4,760,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LO N Funding Source Total $4,760,000 $3,850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a D L 2Q 7 a r m E 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS Packet Pg. 178 STORMWATEI willow if 10 y- r.� s` ^ I R w- _- ��•�' .'=ifs � i �I. � rz� _ a ,i C ro mot' ,e4*'�'rp�,s�:h� `d' b:j�` c.` 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 7.B.a STORMWATER 1• 1211125) 21112(i 211121 Z126 Z12b 4iz,113111a Total LL U PWD-11 Phase 4 Storm Maintenance Project (2024) $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 PWD-12 Phase 5 Storm Maintenance Project (2025) $1,597,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,597,000 $0 a $1,597,( v) d r PWD-13 Phase 6 Storm Maintenance Project (2026) $249,000 $981,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,2305000 $0 $1,230,( ' U- PWD-14 Phase 7 Storm Maintenance Project (2027) $0 $351,000 $1,825,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,176,000 $0 $2,176,( ; a 0 PWD-15 Phase 8 Storm Maintenance Project (2028) $0 $0 $365,000 $1,898,000 $0 $0 $2,263,000 $0 $2,263,( c M PWD-16 Phase 9 Storm Maintenance Project (2029) $0 $0 $0 $380,000 $1,974,000 $0 $2,354,000 $0 O $2,354,( LO O PWD-18 Phase 10 Annual Storm Replacement (2030) $0 $0 $0 $0 $395,000 $2,053,000 $2,448,000 $0 $2,448,( a U- PWD-19 Annual SD Overlays (2024) $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $0 $! U c PWD-22 7317 Lake Ballinger Way Floodplain Purchase & Structure $256,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,000 $0 $261,( a Removal U EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATION O N PWD-01 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements (phase 1) $321,928 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3215928 $0 $32155 c N PWD-05 Edmonds Marsh Water Quality Improvements (phase 2) $386,708 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $386,708 $0 N $386,, PWD-24 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Planning Study $89,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $89,000 $0 $895( c PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN L PWD-03 Perrinville Creek Flow Management Projects $104,000 $108,000 $112,000 $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $685,000 $2,641,000 0 $3,3265( �: 2 PWD-04 Lower Perrinville Creek Restoration Project $350,000 $1,520,000 $2,122,500 $0 $0 $0 $3,992,500 $0 $3,992,! a PWD-23 Perrinville Creek Basin Analysis Update $468,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4685343 $0 $468,: STORm umAiivHut IMPROVEMENT w a PWD-07 Phase 11 Annual Storm Replacement (2031) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $411,000 $411,000 $2,135,000 $2,546,Guu Packet Pg. 180 7.B.a STORMWATER olect UN ZU25 ZU26 ZUZ7 ZUZS ZUZu $Z,U3U Total ZU31-45 Grand low-- COMPLIANCE RELATED c� a PWD-17 Storm and Surface Water Comprehensive Plan $213,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $213,000 $0 $213,( u) ANNUAL TOTAL $4,045,479 $2,965,000 $4,424,500 $2,394,000 $2,489,000 $2,589,000 $18,906,979 $4,776,000 $23,682,f U- M 2025-31 r 'a c • U Citizen Cash Donation $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 0 $25,( o N City of Lynnwood $30,086 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,086 $0 LO $30,( N Federal Grants $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $35,( UQ_- t) Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $3,081,476 $1,825,000 $2,832,625 $2,394,000 $2,489,000 $2,589,000 $15,211,101 $4,776,000 $19,987,' 0- Marsh Preservation Fund $29,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $29,( c M Secured Grants $582,417 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $582,417 $0 O $582,� N Unsecured Grants $262,500 $1,140,000 $1,591,875 $0 $0 $0 $2,994,375 $0 O $2,994,' w d FUNDING TOTAL $4,045,479 $2,965,000 $4,424,500 $2,394,000 $2,489,000 $2,589,000 $18,906,979 $4,776,000 $23,682,4 c L O :.: a c m E .r a Packet Pg. 181 PWD-11-16,18 PHASE 4-25 STORM MAINTENANCE PROJECTS (2025-45) w Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease breakages, and decrease overall da to day maintenance costs. U CU Description Annual storm drain replacement/maintenance projects. Projects propose to replace or rehab storm drain infrastructure in several locations throughout the City. Locations of work identified by City crews and staff via firsthand knowledge or video inspection o results. Much of Edmonds stormwater infrastructure is past its useful lifespan and a requires routine replacement or repair to preserve the function of the storm drain system. Failure to conduct annual maintenance projects will increase chances of story drain system failures. LL Estimated Project Cost $2.0 to $4.4 million/year C *includes prior year expenditures U 0 M O N Budget LO o Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 a- Design $337,000 $351,000 $365,000 $380,000 $395,000 $411,000 $8,539,000 Construction $1,687,000 $1,755,000 $1,825,000 $1,898,000 $1,974,000 $2,053,000 $42,741,000 _ a_ Expense Total $2,024,000 $2,106,000 $2,190,000 $2,278,000 $2,369,000 $2,464,000 $51,280,000 L) Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $2,024,000 $2,106,000 $2,190,000 $2,278,000 $2,369,000 $2,464,000 $51,280,000 0 N Funding Source Total $2,024,000 $2,106,000 $2,190,000 $2,278,000 $2,369,000 $2,464,000 $51,280,000 c N N d a 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS PWD-19 ANNUAL SD OVERLAYS (2024) Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due C to the Annual Storm Replacement Projects. L) c �a Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patche UO.- in previous years as part of the Annual Storm Maintenance Projects. v _ Estimated Project Cost $35,000 (2024) a N d *includes prior year expenditures v R LL Budget CL Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 c Construction $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 M N Expense Total $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 N N Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a v �a a v 0 M O N LO N O N N d D _ 10 N L O c.i IL a� E a 325-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PWD-22 7317 LAKE BALLINGER WAY FLOODPLAIN PURCHASE & STRUCTURE REMOVAL w Benefit Improve the health and water quality of Lake Ballinger by removing hard surfaces and home that is generally uninhabitable. Project will also provide a future location to trea L) stormwater runoff from portions SR-104. c a u_ Description The project purchases an existing single family residential property in 2023 located L) within the Lake Ballinger flood plain. The City secured a $500,000 Department of o Ecology grant to aid in this process. The home is the lowest property on the lake and a badly damaged from previous flooding to the point it is generally uninhabitable. a The City intends to remove the home and any pollution generating surfaces from the LL site in 2024 as part of the initial 2023 purchase. The grant has restrictions that preven - this parcel to be used for public use. After demolition of the structures and impervious a surfaces, the planned site use would be for public utility benefit only. Because the City storm drain line for SR-104 cuts through in an easement immediately adjacent to this M parcel, the City plans to pursue a future project to split appropriate flows from the City N storm drain system and provide water quality treatment to the maximum extent feasibl N The future project would provide water quality treatment for a very heavily trafficked N highway (SR-104) and would make significant improvement in water quality to Lake Ballinger and its downstream course to Lake Washington via McAleer Creek. v Estimated Project Cost $940,000 *includes prior year expenditures a U 0 M O N Budget LO N 0 N Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 a Design $43,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $213,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 = Expense Total $256,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 N Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $256,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Funding Source Total $256,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 a r m E 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS Packet Pg. 184 EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY RESTORATIOI IN No Vt �. ,1�. to •.Sf��`�� �• S AOL Z - r .may . , iL 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PWD-01 Wildlife Refuge EDMONDS MARSH WATER QUALITY N L IMPROVEMENTS Edmonds Marsh Q d (PHASE 1) �• M Z, Cit�Park ` d G w E w Benefit Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the we portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better U habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh. c a LL Description The project will be improving water quality of stormwater runoff by replacing existing L) catch basins along the west side of SR-104 funded via a DOE grant. The catch basin o will be replaced with catch basins that include water filter cartridges. Staff proposes a this effort in order to provide water quality mitigation for all discharges that directly ent Cn .2 the marsh from these locations. M Estimated Project Cost $418,000° ILL *includes prior year expenditures U O M Budget O N N O Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 V Construction $321,928 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a ILL Expense Total $321,928 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $80,482 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a Secured Grants $241,446 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 U 0 Funding Source Total $321,928 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 N LO N O N in d D _ M N Y L 2Q 7 a r m E 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS Packet Pg. 186 PWD-05 ' f , P. a Off EDMONDS MARSH seav'eWP% sw WATER QUALITY 3 185th3t� IMPROVEMENTS 185th PI SW (PHASE 2) ! J wm w * T 186th St SW a ■ min t Benefit Improve water quality of stormwater discharging into the Edmonds Marsh from the we portions of SR-104 located near the marsh. The improvements will provide better habitat for the return of salmon to the marsh. Description The project will be improving water quality of stormwater runoff by replacing existing catch basins along the east side of SR-104 via a state funded appropriation. The cat( basins will be replaced with catch basins that include water filter cartridges. Staff proposes this effort in order to provide water quality mitigation for all discharges that directly enter the marsh from these locations. Estimated Project Cost $458,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget r N N O Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45a. V Design $39,868 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 U- Construction $346,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a Expense Total $386,708 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 U 0 Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $386,708 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 N ARPA Funds $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LO N Secured Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Grants $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 D Funding Source Total $386,708 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 c L 2Q 7 a r m E 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT4 Packet Pg. 187 PWD-24 EDMONDS MARSH ESTUARY PLANNING STUDY Benefit Aid for future planning of Marsh Restoration. Description This study will include completing a gap analysis of existin data, hydrologic evaulatior hydraulic modeling, listing restoration alternatives, minimizing the potential for exposu to contamination, listing permits and approvals required for restoration, evaluating project land purchase and restoration funding options, identifying a process that define community goals for the marsh, and producing scoping documents that list the tasks required to complete the restoration plan. Estimated Project Cost $204,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $89,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $89,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Federal Grants $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Marsh Preservation Fund $29,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Citizen Cash Donation $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $89,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 188 PERRINVILLE CREEK BASH � :�; \'`• A „-tea` a � - �Y; Y ~` � - Rill na • k � �' � � � � ��_, `� .�, ,mow: -a ' • .1� f s.;f' '.` -• a ,y+� '� ,.��•�.'�' •• � _ .. 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PWD-03 PERRINVILLE CREEK FLOW MANAGEMENT PROJECTS w Benefit The project will reduce peak flows in Perrinville creek, improve fish passage and decrease creek bed scour during peak flow events. CU Description Reducing scouring flows to reduce sediments load in Perrinville Creek was identified i U_ a previous basin report completed in 2015 as a critical element of restoring this creek which has been significantly impacted by urban development. The projects funded by o this program are incremental steps toward recovering this stream run as adequate fisl - habitat. These efforts have become even more critical given recent challenges arounc .� the Perrinville Creek outfall area. This program is a fund for implementing projects within the Perrinville Creek basin to reduce scour flows in the creek. It allows staff 1 flexibility to respond to ad -hoc opportunities such as rain garden cluster projects, or ensure matching funds are available for chasing grant applications for flow reductions a projects. Estimated Project Cost $100,000 to $229,000 per year 0 M N *includes prior year expenditures LO c N a u_ Budget _ Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 a Design $10,400 $10,800 $11,200 $11,600 $12,000 $12,500 $300,000 c Construction $93,600 $97,200 $100,800 $104,400 $108,000 $112,500 $2,341,000 M N Expense Total $104,000 $108,000 $112,000 $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $2,641,000 c Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $104,000 $108,000 $112,000 $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $2,641,000 N Funding Source Total $104,000 $108,000 $112,000 $116,000 $120,000 $125,000 $2,641,000 L 2Q 7 a r m E 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS Packet Pg. 190 PWD-04 LOWER PERRINVILLE CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT Benefit The project will reduce City maintenance needs in the future and improve fish passag( Description The purpose of this project is to improve the environmental health of the creek necessary to support fish habitat, and to restore the storm water capacity. The project consists of the modifications to three structures that currently prevent fish passage an are undersized for the flows on the creek, (1) the culvert at the BNSF track, remove and replace with a fish -friendly culvert or bridge with adequate flow capacity, which wi be led and funded by BNSF and the Tulalip Tribes using grant funds, (2) return flow tc the creek between the high flow bypass structure and the BNSF culvert by blocking th structure and restoring creek capacity and (3) culvert at Talbot Road, will be removed and replaced with a fish -friendly culvert or bridge that provides adequate fish passage and storm water flow capacity. This project will increase the resiliency of the watershe by building the structures that mimic the natural channel performance necessary for fish habitat and stormwater flow capacity. The project also includes time and effort to research and apply for supplemental/additional funding sources for construction of the Edmonds portions of the work (Items 2 & 3). Due to the project complexity and numbE of stakeholders, the planning and design phase is estimated to be 2-years. Estimated Project Cost $4,500,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $350,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $1,070,000 $2,122,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $350,000 $1,520,000 $2,122,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $87,500 $380,000 $530,625 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Grants $262,500 $1,140,000 $1,591,875 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $350,000 $1,520,000 $2,122,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 a U_ U _ a_ U 0 M O N LO N O N M a� 0 a r m E M U a Packet Pg. 191 1 PWD-23 PERRINVILLE CREEK BASIN ANALYSIS UPDATE Pernnvdle Geek Lynnwood '(-�hrf-rig I Benefit Improve overall basin and stream health, by using green stormwater infrastructure methods. This will make it so that rainfall is not simply collected and conveyed downstream and instead behaves as close as possible to natural conditions. This includes infiltrating rainfall runoff as close as possible to where it fell. This will also decrease stream peak flows, which will decrease stream erosion and improve the overall stream habitat for aquatic life. Description City of Edmonds and Lynnwood joint project to supplement/update the Perrinville Crel 2015 basin analysis that determined possible locations for projects that would help decrease the peak storm flows during high rain events. Project will be updated to reflE projects completed and also determine if there are other locations within the basin to aid in the reduction of peak flows in the basin. Estimated Project Cost $649,200 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $468,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $468,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $97,286 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Secured Grants $340,971 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 City of Lynnwood $30,086 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $468,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a U- U _ a_ U 0 M O N LO N O N N d L 2Q 7 a r m E M U a Packet Pg. 192 1 7.B.a !I'•.` , > art r�t'�I Sri +'{, ":�: �j � - • > �,�x� l��lr5\!�;?`�flklZT�,- y b� �.�l.;a'+/�.�� `�i'4y�rS ', , �;J%,�? �j�� � V�'1�v'�l�E i�t � •� �� � �/►'1���� � i. �, t� ll' I✓, r,1 r.• I fi if ti7Atl, y n +, 4 _, ��. _ � u�tlt it .j�1•. ?V!1��1�� � � �'iY��� �i';% t, _ �-�. _ � S„ �.+ '�: 4 � ��Ar;� `�{, r'. i aR %�'-a �` •-, 1y 3'y '� ' :+�il�i 'fir► '-�`- _ .+ ram. Packet Pg. 193 PWD-17 STORM AND SURFACE WATER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Benefit Description F2 FOMo„os ww'•••• - Mauxnnx A holistic summary of the City's Stormwater system with recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance and improvements projects. The City of Edmonds (City) owns and operates an extensive system of drainage pipe: ditches, and other assets to convey stormwater runoff into streams, lakes, and Puget Sound to prevent and minimize damage to private property, streets, and other o infrastructure. The City is faced with the challenge of conveying this runoff safely and a cost-effectively while preventing or minimizing the adverse impacts of high flows (erosion, flooding, and sediment deposition) and of stormwater pollutants on water quality and aquatic habitat. In addition, recent state and federal stormwater regulation m make it technically and financially challenging to address these issues while balancinc - utility ratepayer costs. To proactively address these challenges and remain in a compliance with the State -mandated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System M Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Phase II permit) M and other increasing regulatory requirements, the City is updating its current N comprehensive storm and surface water management plan. This permit has and will N continue to have a significant impact on the workload and operational budget of both N the Engineering Division and the Storm Crews within the Public Works Department. P a the State Department of Ecology, the plan will also include the work findings from thei � required (Stormwater Management Action Plan) SMAP process of City drainage watersheds. Project will also include recommendations for stormwater utilities rates tc be adjusted at the discretion of Council. a_ U Estimated Project Cost $733,000 0 0 *includes prior year expenditures N 0 N N d Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 = Design $213,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Y L Expense Total $213,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $213,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 .9 Funding Source Total $213,000 $0 $01 $0 $0 $0 $0 a r a� E 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS Packet Pg. 194 SEWEI i a r ti- •y 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 7.B.a SEWER PWS-01 Annual Sanitary Sewer Replacement Overlays (2024) PWS-02 2027 Sanitary Sewer Comprehensive Plan Update PWS-03 Phase 11 Sewer Replacement (2024) PWS-04 Phase 12 Sewer Replacement (2025) PWS-05 Phase 13 Sewer Replacement (2026) PWS-06 Phase 14 Sewer Replacement (2027) PWS-07 Phase 15 Sewer Replacement (2028) PWS-08 Phase 16 Sewer Replacement (2029) PWS-10 Annual Citywide CIPP Sewer Rehabilitation PWS-12 Phase 17 Sewer Replacement (2030) PWS-13 Phase 18 Sewer Replacement (2031) EXPENSE TOTAL Z1125 Z1112b 2121 Zi,26 Zfz1bi Total i E- LL tU $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500 $0 $500 $0 $150,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 a $500,000 q) d r $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $10,000 z U- $2,302,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,302,000 $0 $2,302,000 ; a M $378,000 $2,126,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,504,000 $0 $2,504,000 c M O $0 $393,000 $2,210,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,603,000 $0 $2,603,000 LO O $0 $0 $409,000 $2,299,000 $0 $0 $2,708,000 $0 $2,708,000 a LL $0 $0 $0 $425,000 $2,391,000 $0 $2,816,000 $0 $2,816,000 L) c $0 $0 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $662,000 $2,496,000 $13,735,000 $16,231,000 a_ U $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $460,000 $460,000 $2,586,000 $3,046,000 c N $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LO $0 c N $2,690,500 $2,669,000 $3,556,000 $3,335,000 $3,027,000 $1,122,000 $16,399,500 $16,321,000 $32,720,500 MO Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $2,690,500 $2,669,000 $3,556,000 $3,335,000 $3,027,000 $1,122,000 $16,389,500 $16,321,000 $32,710,500 i FUNDING TOTAL $2,690,500 $2,669,000 $3,556,000 $3,335,000 $3,027,000 $1,122,000 $16,389,500 $16,321,000 $32,710,500 ! Packet Pg. 196 PWS-01 ANNUAL SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT OVERLAYS (2024) w Benefit Improve overall pavement condition in locations that were excavated and patched due to Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects. L) CU Description Road pavement overlays to cover areas of roadways that were excavated and patche U- in previous years as part of the Sanitary Sewer Replacement Projects. -- _ Estimated Project Cost $30,000 N a� Includes prior year expenditures LL Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 c Construction $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 M N Expense Total $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 c Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 N Funding Source Total $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 a U Packet Pg. 197 1 PWS-02 2027 SANITARY SEWER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Description The existing sewer comprehensive plan was last updated in 2013 and is in need of ar update. This project would be a comprehensive evaluation of the City's sewer systerr its replacement program and operations, with recommendations for improvements or adjustments and recommended priorities for selecting future capital maintenance projects. Estimated Project Cost $500,000 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 Design $0 $150,000 $350,000 Expense Total $0 $150,000 $350,000 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $150,000 $350,000 Funding Source Total $0 $150,000 $350,000 2028 2029 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45 $0 a $0 v $0 = $0 a U 0 M O N LO N O N N d _ N Y L 2Q 7 a Packet Pg. 198 1 PWS-03-09 PHASE 11-30 SEWER REPLACEMENT (2025- 45) Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive Plan, the projects will replace/rehab pipe and related appurtenances at various locations throughout the City due to old ag being undersized, need to increase capacity, or more prone to breakage due to its material properties. Estimated Project Cost $2.7 to $5.3 million/year Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Design $378,000 $393,000 $409,000 $425,000 $442,000 $460,000 Construction $2,312,000 $2,126,000 $2,210,000 $2,299,000 $2,391,000 $2,487,000 Expense Total $2,690,000 $2,519,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000 $2,947,000 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $2,690,000 $2,519,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000 $2,947,000 Funding Source Total $2,690,000 $2,519,000 $2,619,000 $2,724,000 $2,833,000 $2,947,000 2031-45LO N $9,568,000 N $51,780,000 a. $61,348,000 _ $61,348,000 a $61,348,000 U 0 M O N LO N O N N d i� a Packet Pg. 199 1 PWS-10 ANNUAL CITYWIDE CIPP SEWER REHABILITATION Benefit Improve system reliability and capacity, decrease infiltration and inflow, decrease breakages, and decrease overall day to day maintenance costs. Description Per the approved 2013 Sewer Comprehensive plan and current video inspections of sewer mains, the project will line existing sewer mains that are subject root intrusion, infiltration and inflow, and damage that can be repaired by this trenchless method. 2025 and 2026 funds will be combined with the Annual Sewer Replacement Program. This is because the annual replacement rehab program for these years will be focusir on pipe lining as well thereby requiring only 1 design and 1 construction contract to administer. Estimated Project Cost $587,000 to $662,000/year Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $0 $0 $88,000 $92,000 $96,000 $100,000 $2,070,000 Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $499,000 $519,000 $540,000 $562,000 $11,665,000 Expense Total $0 $0 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $662,000 $13,735,000 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $0 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $662,000 $13,735,000 Funding Source Total $0 $0 $587,000 $611,000 $636,000 $662,000 $13,735,000 Packet Pg. 200 1 FACILITIE I d - USEUM - •1O1(1•: -M 1 ILL � cowiemu 2025-2030 PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL FACILITIES PROGRAM I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS 7.B.a FACILITIES Project .- 211125 21112b Z11Z1 Z1126Total a U- U PWF-01 Boys and Girls Club $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $0 $132,364 $0 $132,364 = c� PWF-02 Cemetery Building $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 $5,000 $2,500 $21,109 $0 $21,109 a y m w PWF-03 City Hall $25,000 $25,000 $258,628 $150,949 $65,000 $50,000 $574,577 $0 $574,577 '5 LL PWF-04 Fishing Pier/Beach Ranger Station $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 $3,000 $5,000 $19,089 $0 $19,089 Q- M PWF-05 Frances Anderson Center $20,000 $30,000 $98,892 $385,274 $113,029 $80,000 $727,195 $0 $727,195 v 0 M PWF-06 Fire Station 16 $35,000 $40,000 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $241,126 $0 $2417126 0 LO PWF-07 Fire Station 17 $30,000 $25,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 $471,742 $0 $471,742 0 v a U- PWF-08 Fire Station 20 $5,000 $5,500 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $218,295 $0 $2187295 v c PWF-09 Historic Log Cabin $1,000 $30,000 $6,469 $1,500 $2,000 $1,500 $42,469 $0 $42,469 c� a U PWF-10 Historical Museum $3,000 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $77,820 $0 $777820 c N PWF-11 Library $160,000 $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $25,000 $418,363 $0 $418,363 c N PWF-12 Meadowdale Club House $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $28,590 $0 $28,590 N d w PWF-13 Old Public Works $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $149,519 $0 $149,519 w c PWF-14 Parks Maintenance Building $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $123,754 $0 $123,754 PWF-15 Public Safety $50,000 $10,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 $861,721 $0 $861,721 L O 3: 2 PWF-16 Public Works 0&M $524,000 $1,017,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $1,794,484 $0 $1,794,484 a PWF-17 Wade James Theater $3,000 $45,000 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $254,486 $0 $254,486 E PWF-18 Yost Pool House $5,000 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $25,000 $117,925 $0 $117,925 s r a PWF-23 Library Plaza Deck Waterproofing Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $4,900,000 $0 $4,900,000 EXPENSE TOTAL $942,399 $1,461,990 $1,140,688 $1,159,399 $1,081,152 $5,389,000 $11,174,628 $0 Packet Pg. 202 7.B.a FACILITIES 1-unaing source Z125 Z112bi i i Total a U_ U Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) $450,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $800,000 = c� Fund 016 (non -bond) $93,399 $134,813 $151,159 $70,949 $0 $0 $450,320 $0 $450,320 a y m w Fund 421 - Water Utility $133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $457,000 $0 $457,000 '3 U_ Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility $133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $457,000 $0 $457,000 Q. m Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $457,000 $0 $457,000 v 0 M Unsecured Funding $0 $5,177 $989,529 $1,088,450 $1,081,152 $5,389,000 $8,553,308 $0 $8,553,308 0 `� uO N FUNDING TOTAL $942,399 $1,461,990 $1,140,688 $1,159,399 $1,081,152 $5,389,000 $11,174,628 $0 $11,174,628 N Packet Pg. 203 PWF-01 BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This building built in 1900 was the original field house for Edmonds High School. The property is located at Civic Field and not part of the large Civic Field Park restoration project. The building is solely operated by the Snohomish County Boys and Girls Club in partnership with the City's Parks and Recreation department. The building has sustained some interior settling that will require immediate repair to back hallway floor and the back stairway. It has significant need for major renovations if it is expected to be in operation for another 10 years. Renovation and deferred maintenance may eclipse the building value in its current location. Floor stabilization work was completed, and building is now on a run to fail model waiting replacement of building through a private public partnership. Building will be maintained in operational readiness to support the Boys and Girls Club, until their new building is constructed. Estimated Project Cost Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (non -bond) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total Projects: Exterior plumbing access, Window replacement, Roof replacement, Siding N replacement, ADA Access, Plumbing replacement, Front entry door replacement, Fire a Alarm System new installation, Fire Sprinkler updates, Baseboard heating replacemel U_ If the Boys and Girls Club builds a new facility in the future, then maintenance funding programmed for the building will be adjusted to align with the project schedule. a_ G 0 $27,733 (2025) 0 N LO N O N N d 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 -Or_$27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $0 $0 Y $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $0 $0 0 $27,733 $37,453 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3 $0 $0 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $0 $0 a r $27,733 $37,453 $32,077 $15,101 $20,000 $0 $0 E a Packet Pg. 204 1 PWF-02 CEMETERY BUILDING Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This small structure houses the Edmonds Cemetery funerary services and the cemetery Sextant office. The building is in relatively good condition and has little deferred maintenance backlog. Minor security and communications updates will be needed as technology dictates. Projects: Minor repair and maintenance Estimated Project Cost $8,414 (2025) 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction\Professional $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 $5,000 $2,500 $0 Services Expense Total $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 $5,000 $2,500 $0 Fund 016 (non -bond) $8,414 $3,377 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $818 $1,000 $5,000 $2,500 $0 Funding Source Total $8,414 $3,377 $818 $1,000 $5,000 $2,500 $0 Packet Pg. 205 1 PWF-03 CITY HALL Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description City Hall was built in 1979 and was operated as a private business office center until the City purchased and renovated the building in the 1990s. The City has operated Edmonds City Hall from this location since the renovations were completed. The building is in near original condition and needs substantial repair and maintenance. Projects: All Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing systems need replacement, Restroom remodels w/gender neutral consideration, Center Stairway Code updates and replacement, Lobby remodel, Entry Awning re -glazing, Interior Painting, ADA accessibility improvements. Estimated Project Cost $25,000 (2025) 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction\Professional $25,000 $25,000 $258,628 $150,949 $65,000 $50,000 $0 Services Expense Total $25,000 $25,000 $258,628 $150,949 $65,000 $50,000 $0 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond) $0 $0 $150,000 $70,949 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $108,628 $80,000 $65,000 $50,000 $0 Funding Source Total $25,000 $25,000 $258,628 $150,949 $65,000 $50,000 $0 Packet Pg. 206 1 PWF-04 FISHING PIER/BEACH RANGER STATION Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description The Pier was recently renovated and is generally in good condition. The Beach Rang( Office is a 1200 square foot office and restroom facility located near the east end of tl- pier. There are season programs and visitor support functions that operate out of this facility. Projects: Electrical panel clean up and safety inspection, minor repairs, and maintenance, Beach Ranger Station/restroom roof replacement. Estimated Project Cost $2,971 (2025) 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction\Professional $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 $3,000 $5,000 $0 Services Expense Total $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 $3,000 $5,000 $0 Fund 016 (non -bond) $2,918 $5,628 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $1,043 $1,500 $3,000 $5,000 $0 Funding Source Total $2,918 $5,628 $1,043 $1,500 $3,000 $5,000 $0 Packet Pg. 207 1 PWF-05 FRANCES ANDERSON CENTER Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description The Frances Anderson Center serves as the City's main recreation center offering art athletic and cultural programing year round. Due to the age and high usage of the building there are many building systems that are in need of replacement or restoratic Projects: Replacement of Heating Boilers with Electric alternatives that will add ventilation, cooling and heating Investment grade audit approved by City Council, Replacement of all exterior doors scheduled for 2024/25, ADA accessible door closures, Plumbing drainage collector, Restroom remodels (w/ gender neutral consideration), Replacement of all plumbing fixtures, Addition of building security carc readers, Building HVAC controls to maximize efficiency, Fire Sprinkler replacement, and clean building act compliance efforts will be addresses by IGA.) Estimated Project Cost $20,000 (2025) Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction\Professional $20,000 $30,000 $98,892 $385,274 $113,029 $80,000 $0 Services Expense Total $20,000 $30,000 $98,892 $385,274 $113,029 $80,000 $0 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities $20,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bond) Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $98,892 $385,274 $113,029 $80,000 $0 Funding Source Total $20,000 $30,000 $98,892 $385,274 $113,029 $80,000 $0 Packet Pg. 208 1 PWF-06 FIRE STATION 16 Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This facility is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue and was built it 2003 and has a building area of 10,700 square feet. The building is in fair condition ar will require some infrastructure updates or replacements to remain operationally read) for the needs of the City. Projects: Roll -up Bay door controller replacements, HVAC unit assessment, Gutter replacement, interior coatings updates. Estimated Project Cost $35000 (2025) *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction\Professional $35,000 $40,000 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $0 Services Expense Total $35,000 $40,000 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $0 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities $35,000 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bond) Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $0 Funding Source Total $35,000 $40,000 $69,388 $30,107 $31,631 $35,000 $0 Packet Pg. 209 MMMMMMMMMML��� PWF-07 FIRE STATION 17 Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This building is operated by South Snohomish County Fire and Rescue, was built in 1999 and has a building area of 9,800 square feet. This building has had some update but will need some infrastructure upgrades to remain operationally ready. Projects: Bay Door assessment, Electrical infrastructure updates, roof soffit enclosure interior painting. Estimated Project Cost $30,000 (2025) *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 a- Construction\Professional $30,000 $25,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 $0 Services Expense Total $30,000 $25,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 $0 U Fund 016 (2021 Facilities $30,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CD Bond) N Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 LO $0 N Funding Source Total $30,000 $25,000 $221,922 $27,575 $122,245 $45,000 $0 a L 2Q 7 a m E 2025-2030 PUBLIC Packet Pg. 210 MEMEMEMEMEL 7.B.a PUBLIC WORKS -FACILITIES I! FIRE STATION 20 Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This building is the eldest of the City's three fire stations and is operated by South County Fire and Rescue. This station serves Esperance and supports the other two fii stations in Edmonds. The building is 6400 square feet and was built in 1990. The building has had significant updates to the exterior envelope and is in need of interior and HVAC system updates. Projects: interior painting, restroom fixture replacement Estimated Project Cost $5000 (2025) 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 ConstructionTrofessional $5,000 $5,500 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $0 Services Expense Total $5,000 $5,500 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $0 Fund 016 (non -bond) $5,000 $5,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $0 Funding Source Total $5,000 $5,500 $94,248 $69,782 $23,765 $20,000 $0 Packet Pg. 211 1 PWF-09 HISTORIC LOG CABIN Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This Historic log cabin is home to the Edmonds Chamber of Commerce visitor center, the structure was a purpose built cabin from the turn of the century. The structure is professionally maintained on a three year cycle by a log cabin specialist and requires only minor maintenance and upkeep annually. Projects: new thick cut shingle replacement, chinking of exterior log finish, interior lighting. Estimated Project Cost $1000 (2025) *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $1,000 $30,000 $6,469 $1,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $30,000 $6,469 $1,500 $2,000 $1,500 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,469 $1,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $30,000 $6,469 $1,500 $2,000 $1,500 R a u_ 2031-45 v $0 a_ U $0 O M O $0 N N O $0 N `� $0 $0 �a L 2Q 7 c,> a Packet Pg. 212 PWF-10 HISTORICAL MUSEUM Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description The 110-year-old original Carnegie Library building is home to the Edmonds Museum The building is on the State of Washington Historic registry and has been well maintained over the last several years. Buildings of this age require specialized maintenance and coordination with the state historic architect to maintain the historic status. Structural stabilization, weatherproofing, and updating the restroom to meet ADA compliance are the most significant priorities to maintain this facility. Projects: minor structural reinforcement, entry fagade masonry repair, lower entry restoration Estimated Project Cost $3000 (2025) 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction\Professional $3,000 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $0 Services Expense Total $3,000 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $0 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond) $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $0 Funding Source Total $3,000 $45,000 $10,000 $4,621 $10,199 $5,000 $0 Packet Pg. 213 1 MMMMMMMMM"�� PWF-11 LIBRARY Benefit Description w Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an L) expected lifespan. c CU a LL The Edmonds Library is operated by the Sno-Isle Library system with exception of the v Second floor Plaza room rental space. The library is a 19,000 square foot building bui o in 1982. The building hosts special event rentals and daily Library programming and a community services. This is one of the City's most heavily used buildings by the public .0 and has significant deferred maintenance needs, including the building fagade, roof ai plaza deck waterproofing. LL Projects: window replacement, ADA access device upgrades or replacement, gender a inclusive public restroom creation, Plaza Room restroom/changing facilities, Plaza Room AN installation, building masonry restoration or building cladding, exterior M stairway restoration, HVAC ventilation fan assessment, building breezeway remodel, N flood damage restoration, and plaza level green roof now on CIP. N 0 N Estimated Project Cost $160,000 (2025) Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Construction\Professional $160,000 $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $25,000 Services Expense Total $160,000 $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $25,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities $160,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bond) Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $25,000 Funding Source Total $160,000 $100,000 $53,325 $45,038 $35,000 $25,000 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 214 1 PWF-12 MEADOWDALE CLUB HOUSE Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This 4000 square foot facility was built in 1965 as a community theater facility and IatE was transformed into the Meadowdale community club house. The building is currentl owned and maintained by the City of Edmonds and houses the City operated Meadowdale pre-school and the 1500 square foot Meadowdale club house rental facility. This facility while dated has been well maintained and only requires minor maintenance and repairs. Projects: minor maintenance and repairs, interior flooring and painting, and bath fixtur replacement. Estimated Project Cost $7,985 (2025) 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction\Professional $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 Services Expense Total $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 Fund 016 (non -bond) $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 Funding Source Total $7,985 $4,446 $1,159 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 Packet Pg. 215 1 7.B.a PWF-13 OLD PUBLIC WORKS Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This facility was built in 1965 to house the City's Public Works Department, the buildir was converted in 1995 to tenant space and City storage, as well as Edmonds Police large evidence storage. This is a vital piece of property adjacent to the Waste Water Treatment Plant, and could be converted for utility use if regulatory requirements dictate. Building is primarily used as storage and will need some updates to maintain current operational readiness. Projects: HVAC updates, roll -up door replacement, security camera system Estimated Project Cost $25000 (2025) Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016(non-bond) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $24,519 $25,000 $0 Packet Pg. 216 1 PWF-14 PARKS MAINTENANCE BUILDING Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This facility was built in 1967 by Ed Huntley who at the time was the City Facilities supervisor. The 4800 square foot facility now houses all City Facility Operations staff(11) and all of Park and Rec Parks Maintenance Staff(12+ seasonal help) This Facility is home to the City Carpentry Shop, Key Shop, City Flower program, Parks engine repair shop and Parks and Facilities maintenance supply storage as well as Parks and Facilities Manager offices. This Facility is near end of life and is undersizec to support the departmental staffing that are assigned to this facility. Projects: maintenance and repair to maintain operational capacity, ADA restroom updates, shop floor replacement, Pine St. facility exit, exterior painting. Estimated Project Cost $9,349 (2025) Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (non -bond) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $9,349 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $9,349 $5,177 $69,228 $20,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 Packet Pg. 217 1 PWF-15 PUBLIC SAFETY Benefit ti-c Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description The Public Safety building houses Edmonds Police Department, Edmonds Municipal Court and the City Council Chambers. The building was built in 1999 encompassing 30,000 square feet of office, court and municipal government uses. The building houses one of the City emergency operations centers, large police training, simulator facilities and evidence processing and storage. The building has had minimal system updates over it's life and has a significant amount of deferred maintenance and shout( be retrofitted with new fire sprinklers. Projects: air handler and outdoor ventilation unit replacements, new solar plant installation, parking lot reconfiguration to meet current usage, fire sprinkler installation interior hallway renovation and painting, sleeping room remodel and gender specific/neutral accommodations, gender inclusive public restrooms, operable windo\n is specific locations, courts flat roof replacement. Estimated Project Cost $50000 (2025) '`includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Construction\Professional $50,000 $10,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 Services Expense Total $50,000 $10,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities $50,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bond) Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 Funding Source Total $50,000 $10,000 $55,169 $151,481 $515,071 $80,000 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 218 PWF-16 PUBLIC WORKS O&M "44 . Pi Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This building built in 1995 houses four Public Works divisions and the auxiliary City Emergency Operations Center. This building is 28,000 square feet and is capable of operations 24/7 during weather emergencies and natural disasters. The building has significant deferred maintenance needs and infrastructure updates. Projects: vehicle yard leveling, HVAC unit replacements, roof system for material bunkers, ventilation fan replacements, fire alarm system replacement, lobby remodel, restroom remodel with gender inclusivity considerations, electric vehicle charging and maintenance infrastructure, emergency communications updates, interior hallway flooring thresholds, utility bay HVAC replacement, water main replacement (building connection). Estimated Project Cost $125000 (2025) 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Unsecured Funding Fund 421 -Water Utility Fund 422 - Stormwater Utility Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $524,000 $1,017,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $0 $524,000 $1,017,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $0 $125,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $0 $133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $133,000 $324,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $524,000 $1,017,000 $80,315 $79,348 $43,821 $50,000 $0 Packet Pg. 219 PWF-17 WADE JAMES THEATER Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This community theater was built by the Driftwood Players theater group in 1967 and was deeded to City ownership at a later date. The facility is 6,300 square feet in size and houses the Driftwood Players theatrical performances and City meetings. The City's maintenance responsibilities are limited to large infrastructure, parking lot, roofing, and grounds. Projects: parking lot repair and recoating, minor repair, and maintenance Estimated Project Cost $3000 (2025) 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction\Professional $3,000 $45,000 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $0 Services Expense Total $3,000 $45,000 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $0 Fund 016 (2021 Facilities $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Bond) Fund 016 (non -bond) $3,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Unsecured Funding $0 $0 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $0 Funding Source Total $3,000 $45,000 $43,880 $115,734 $21,872 $25,000 $0 Packet Pg. 220 1 7.B.a PWF-18 YOST POOL HOUSE Benefit Public owned facilities and properties are maintained to assure safe and property operating conditions and to assure the protection of the physical asset throughout an expected lifespan. Description This recreational facility houses the City's aquatic programing and some Parks and Recreation programs. Built in 1971 the pool house historically was only operated seasonally. The tenant run aquatic programing is currently expanding to year round la and team aquatic activities and will continue to support summer open swim programing. The facility requires minimal maintenance to remain operational and is subject to tenant lease terms of use. Projects: security updates, roof replacement, gutter replacement, plumbing fixture updates, exterior door replacements, operational repair and maintenance to accommodate 365 operations. Estimated Project Cost $5000 (2025) "includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Fund 016 (2021 Facilities Bond) Fund 016(non-bond) Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $5,000 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $25,000 $5,000 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $25,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,409 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $25,000 $5,000 $8,409 $19,127 $30,389 $30,000 $25,000 a a_ U _ a 2031-45 L) 0 $0 M 0 N LO N $0 0 N $0 N $0 $0 M 0 19 $0 0 a Packet Pg. 221 PWF-23 LIBRARY PLAZA DECK WATERPROOFING PROJECT Benefit Maintaining building in operational and safe condition, in order to maintain partnership with Sno-Isle Library system. Preservation of the City's physical assets in appropriate condition vs. the age of the facility and historic capital investment. Description The Library Plaza Deck is essentially a green roof on the second floor of the Edmond! Sno-Isle Library. The deck surface was waterproofed and remodeled in 2003, since that project continuous water intrusion has occurred through the waterproof membran This water intrusion has been successfully mitigated over the years and has not been deemed a project of significance previously. In 2018 Western Specialty Contractors inspected the water intrusion and offered an initial ROM price to demolish and waterproof the existing plaza deck. Rebuilding the plaza deck and replacement of landscape, planters, grass, pavement, flashing and hand railings would be a separate construction project. The Parks Director in 2018 offered an estimate to replace landscaping and irrigations systems. In 2021 a draft structural report was performed Is MLA Engineering to discover any structural consequences from the years of water intrusion, building was deemed structurally sound and water intrusion not factoring in building structural stability. Estimated Project Cost $4,900,000 (2030) Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Construction\Professional Services Expense Total Unsecured Funding Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,900,000 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 222 1 0 WASTEWATER TREATEMENT PLANT 7.B.a PWP-01 WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In -House Projects PWP-04 Nutrient Removal Project PWP-10 VFD Upgrades PWP-12 Primary Clarifier 3 Rehab PWP-13 ODS (Primary Sludge) Pump Replacement Chlorine Contact Channel Sluice Gates PWP-14 Replacement PWP-15 Screw Press Feed System Rehab PWP-16 NPW Pumping System Improvements PWP-17 600 Bldg Air Quality Evaluation PWP-18 LPA Blower 303 Rehab PWP-19 600 Bldg Electrical Rehab PWP-20 600 Bldg Air Quality Rehab/Upgrade PWP-21 Secondary Clarifier 2 Rehab EXPENSE TOTAL City of Shoreline Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District FUNDING TOTAL $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $750,000 $750,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,760,000 $2,850,000 $21,450,000 $21,625,000 $1,250,000 $261,924 $270,465 $2,035,605 $2,052,212 $118,625 $1,401,805 $1,447,515 $10,894,455 $10,983,338 $634,875 $639,492 $660,345 $4,969,965 $5,010,513 $289,625 $456,779 $471,675 $3,549,975 $3,578,937 $206,875 $2,760,000 $2,850,000 $21,450,000 $21,625,000 $1,250,000 $0 $4,500,000 $0 $41,500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $950,000 $0 $600,000 $0 $375,000 $0 $150,000 $0 $75,000 $0 $50,000 $0 $35,000 $0 $250,000 $0 $450,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $49,935,000 $0 $4,738,831 $0 $25,361,988 $0 $11,569,940 $0 $8,264,241 $0 $49,935,000 ' a U_ U $0 $4,500,000 = a $0 $41,500,000 y m w $0 $500,000 '5 U_ $0 $950,000 Q cU $0 $600,000 c M $0 $375,000 O LO $0 $150,000 O v a U_ $0 $75,000 c c� $0 $50,000 a U $0 $35,000 c N $0 $250,000 c N N $0 $450,000 2 w $0 $500,000 c $0 $49,935,000 $0 $4,738,831 a $0 $25,361,988 $0 $11,569,940 M $0 $8,264,241 Q $0 $49,935,000 Packet Pg. 224 PWP-01 WWTP ANNUAL CAPITAL REPLACEMENT IN- HOUSE PROJECTS Benefit This project ensures that critical infrastructure is maintained and equipment is replace in order to reduce risk to the City. Description The WWTP Annual Capital Replacement In -House Projects is intended to maintain infrastructure and equipment to ensure that the treatment plant is well maintained. Estimated Project Cost $500,000 (2024) Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000 $250,000 $250,000 $400,000 $400,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $253,950 $253,950 $507,900 $634,875 $634,875 $115,850 $115,850 $231,700 $289,625 $289,625 $82,750 $82,750 $165,500 $206,875 $206,875 $47,450 $47,450 $94,900 $118,625 $118,625 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 2030 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 225 1 7.B.a PWP-04 NUTRIENT REMOVAL PROJECT Benefit To meet new permit requirements and increase capacity for projected 20-year service area expansion. Description The WA Dept of Ecology has imposed the Puget Sound Nutrient General Permit upor us. It is anticipated that our current process will not be able to meet these new permit requirements. This decision package will allow us to team with an engineering firm to study our current process and design a solution that will allow our plant to meet the new PSNGP requirements as well as accommodate projected service area growth ov, the next decade. Estimated Project Cost $41,850,000 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $750,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 i20,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $750,000 $750,000 >20,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $0 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $380,925 $380,925 i10,158,000 $10,158,000 $0 $0 $0 Mountlake Terrace $173,775 $173,775 $4,634,000 $4,634,000 $0 $0 $0 Olympic View Water Sewer $124,125 $124,125 $3,310,000 $3,310,000 $0 $0 $0 District City of Shoreline $71,175 $71,175 $1,898,000 $1,898,000 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $750,000 $750,000 >20,000,000 $20,000,000 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 226 1 NNNNNNNL��� PWP-10 VFD UPGRADES Benefit To keep critical equipment reliable and in working condition. Description The WWTP has several VFD's (variable frequency drives) on various critical equipme influent pumps, effluent pumps, RAS/WAS pumps, aeration blowers, etc. These VFD have an expected useful life of 15-20 years. Several of the VFD's here at the plant range in age between 20-30 years old. There have already bees some failures and replacements made. These outdated VFD's need to be replaced to avoid a catastrophic failure event that could happen to these weakened state VFD's for any number of reasons, including abrupt starting and stopping due to power bumps/loss, switching from grid to generator power supply or just a parts failure. If multiple critical components fail simultaneously, then the plant may lose it's ability to treat wastewater that meets NPDES permit requirements resulting in pollution of our receiving waters and possible fines by our governing agency. Estimated Project Cost $250,000 'includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $126,975 $126,975 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,925 $57,925 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,375 $41,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,725 $23,725 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 227 1 PWP-12 PRIMARY CLARIFIER 3 REHAB Benefit Improve reliability of critical infrastructure as it is approaching a state of imminent failure. Ensure WWTP's ability to treat wastewater up to its rated capacity and meet discharge permit requirements. Description Primary Clarifier #3 (dual drive) cages, center columns, feedwells, corner sweeps, weirs, counterweights, skimming devices and rake arms need replacement due to severe corrosion. The steel is in a highly corrosive environment and has not been replaced since the original construction approximately 30 years ago. The limited acce will require that pieces be assembled inside the tank. The concrete structure also needs to be inspected and repaired as needed as corrosion of the concrete in spots has led to exposed rebar and may have compromised the structural integrity of the clarifier. Estimated Project Cost $950,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $482,505 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $220,115 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $157,225 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,155 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 228 PWP-13 ODS (PRIMARY SLUDGE) PUMP REPLACEMENT Benefit Improve reliability, redundancy and efficiency of the primary sludge and scum pumps I replacing 30+ year old pumps and improving piping system. Description The ODS pumps are over 30 years old and are at the end of their useful life. The maintenance, reliability and efficiency of the primary sludge pumping system would bE greatly improved by replacing the current diaphragm pumps with progressive cavity pumps. During this pump replacement, piping modifications would also be done to allow pumps to support more than one clarifier, improving system redundancy along with reliability. Estimated Project Cost $600,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget b Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $250,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $0 $350,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $177,765 $126,975 $0 $0 $0 $0 Mountlake Terrace $0 $81,095 $57,925 $0 $0 $0 $0 Olympic View Water Sewer $0 $57,925 $41,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 District City of Shoreline $0 $33,215 $23,725 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $350,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 229 1 PWP-14 CHLORINE CONTACT CHANNEL SLUICE GATES REPLACEMENT Benefit To replace problematic, yet critical valves with more reliable technology that helps to ensure disinfection system functionality and the ability to continue to meet NPDES discharge permit requirements. Description Replace two gate valves and actuators at the inlets of the two chlorine contact channels. These gates have repeatedly failed. Repair is often expensive and time consuming, as access is an issue, so it is necessary to rent scaffolding and other equipment to make repairs. When a gate fails, it effectively cuts the disinfection capacity of the plant in half. These are critical pieces of equipment and need to be replaced with a different technology to improve performance and reliability. Estimated Project Cost $375,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $190,463 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $86,888 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,062 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,587 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 230 1 PWP-15 SCREW PRESS FEED SYSTEM REHAB Benefit -.Av, Replacing these pumps allows for consistent and reliable operation of the sludge dewatering system which supplies dewatered biosolids to the new gasification system Description Replace two sludge feed pumps and three polymer pumps that are reaching the end c U, their useful life and are often down for repairs. s c Estimated Project Cost $150,000 ° Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Construction Expense Total Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,185 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,755 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,825 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,235 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 231 1 PWP-16 NPW PUMPING SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Benefit Description r � W '%i - . I" 1_1 11 _1 Current NPW system in non-functional as currently built. Only current one pump provides the needed system pressure to allow the standby generator to function. In thl event of that pump failing, the standby generator (which is required as a backup powe source per our NPDES permit) is not operable. This project will allow for much needec i NPW redundancy. Relocate one NPW pump, replace one NPW pump and modify piping as needed to achieve system functionality. Estimated Project Cost $75,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget b Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $38,093 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Mountlake Terrace $17,378 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Olympic View Water Sewer $12,412 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 District City of Shoreline $7,118 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 232 1 PWP-17 600 BLDG AIR QUALITY EVALUATION Benefit After rehab/upgrade project is complete (2026-part 2 of this project), it will improve performance and reliability as well as lowering operational and maintenance costs for the systems mentioned above. Description Evaluate the AQ issues within the 600 Bldg with a focus on the lower level where H2S gas appears to be accumulating at levels that are high enough to do damage to sensitive electronic equipment such as VFD's, control boards and relay switches. These electronic failures cause shutdowns in the primary sludge pumping system, hig pressure plant aie system and sludge dewatering system. Estimated Project Cost $50,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget b Project Cost Design Expense Total Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,395 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,585 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,275 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,745 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 233 1 PWP-18 LPA BLOWER 303 REHAB Benefit Description As this is our medium sized blower, it allows for more efficient and cost -saving operation of the LPA system. Blower is currently running at 75% capacity as it is at the end of it's useful life (30,000 . hrs, put in service in 2017) and is due for a rebuild. Estimated Project Cost $35,000 *includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Construction $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $17,777 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Mountlake Terrace $8,110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Olympic View Water Sewer $5,792 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 District City of Shoreline $3,322 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I Packet Pg. 234 1 PWP-19 600 BLDG ELECTRICAL - -ir REHAB Y ■ W, � �9M i rr •ro Benefit Rehab of the 600 Bldg electrical system will result in a tremendous increase in the reliability of the critical systems within the 600 Bldg including sludge dewatering, prime sludge pumping, high-pressure air, chemical disinfection pumps and several others. Description Both the high and low voltage electrical systems are in a degraded state and have funtionality issues during periods of high demand, often resulting in equipment failure due to MCC or breaker failures. This is a critical system and is at the end of it's useful life, being well over thirty years old. Estimated Project Cost $250,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget b Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $126,975 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,925 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,725 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 235 1 PWP-20 600 BLDG AIR QUALITY REHAB/UPGRADE 7 7- ' m Benefit Improve performance and reliability as well as lowering operational and maintenance costs for the systems mentioned above. Description Perform AQ system repairs and modifications from the prior years' AQ Evaluation Project to resolve the AQ issues within the 600 bldg with a focus on the lower level where 1-12S gas appears to be accumulating at levels that are high enough to do damage to sensitive electronic equipment such as VFD's, control boards and relay switches. These electronic failures cause shutdowns in the primary sludge pumping system, high pressure plant aie system and sludge dewatering system. Estimated Project Cost $250,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget b Project Cost 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 Design $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Expense Total $0 $250,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Fund 423 - Sewer Utility $0 $126,975 $101,580 $0 $0 $0 $0 Mountlake Terrace $0 $57,925 $46,340 $0 $0 $0 $0 Olympic View Water Sewer $0 $41,375 $33,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 District City of Shoreline $0 $23,725 $18,980 $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source Total $0 $250,000 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 236 1 PWP-21 SECONDARY CLARIFIER 2 REHAB Benefit This will increase reliability/redundancy in the secondary system and help ensure the final effluent meets NPDES discharge permit standards. Description Secondary Clarifier 2 has reached the end of useful life as it's components are over 31 years old and need to be replaced. Clarifier drive, drive motor and steel structure hav( corroded and need repair or replacement. Concrete needs to be evaluated and repaired if necessary. Estimated Project Cost $450,000 Includes prior year expenditures Budget Project Cost Design Construction Expense Total Fund 423 - Sewer Utility Mountlake Terrace Olympic View Water Sewer District City of Shoreline Funding Source Total 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031-45 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $253,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $115,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,450 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Packet Pg. 237 1 A ,!P�EDMONDS 0, PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES 2025-2030 PROPOSED CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN & CAPITALIMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 8 .4 DRAFT SEPTEMBER 2024 "EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Table of Contents Director's Letter................................................................ 2 CIP/CFP Worksheets.......................................................3-6 Project Distribution Map ................................................. 7 Project Descriptions......................................................8-26 Program Descriptions...................................................27-29 Acquisition Descriptions...............................................30-31 FundDetail..................................................................... 32 Fund 332 (Capital Const. & Impact Fee) Detail ............33-34 Fund 125 (REET 11) Detail ................................................ 35 Fund 126 (REET 1) Detail ................................................. 36 Fund 143 (Tree) Detail .................................................... 37 Fund 137 (Cemetery) Detail ........................................... 38 Annual Project Comparison ............................................ 39 A&I r 4 �" V ee� t 7.B.b EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES September 30, 2024 Members of the City Council, Parks & Planning Board, Staff and Citizens of Edmonds, The Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department presents the City of Edmonds Parks 6-year Parks Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The CIP/CFP serve as a planning guide identifying parks capital projects and related funding sources. It reflects the priorities established in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan priorities as well as unforeseen opportunities and demands. The CIP/CFP is updated annually through a public process including presentations and Public Hearings hosted by both the Parks & Planning Board and the City Council during the budget process. Highlights of the 2024 parks capital project accomplishments through August include: 1. Acquisition of the Mee property expands the Mathay Ballinger Park by 50% and the purchase and related costs were 80% grant funded ($880,000 grant). 2. Demolition of unusable structures, removal of invasive plants and site security of the 1-acre parcel donated by Shirley Johnson adjacent to Yost was completed. 3. Improvements to the McAleer Lake Ballinger Access area. 4. Installation of automated door locks on all park restrooms to decrease damage and vandalism. 5. Standardization of park entry signage. 6. Replacement of the outdoor shower, an additional foot wash station and installation of ADA compliant water bottle filler to replace a non -working drinking fountain. The remaining 2024 capital projects in process include: 1. Improvements continue at Mathay Ballinger Park with installation of a permanent restroom and remaining improvements including ADA accessible pathway, parking improvement, picnic shelter and additional park amenities. 2. Completing open space improvements to meet a 2008 State of Washington grant non-compliance issue. 3. Installation of "No Boating" buoys along the Waterfront as resulting from US Coast Guard audit. Currently, the focus of our capital work is on deferred maintenance throughout the city's existing parks system and recreation facilities. With an aging system and lack of adequate asset management through Edmonds' parks and facilities, amenities are reaching the end of their useful life and require significant repairs or replacement. Some of which require significant permitting due to proximity to salmon -bearing waterways. Another priority in our capital work is addressing ADA accessibility compliance issues both during renovation and repair work as well as stand-alone new projects to address the issue. Ensuring our parks, trails, open spaces and recreation facilities and amenities are inclusive and welcoming and equitability available to all Edmond's residents and visitors is an emphasis of all our parks capital work. Your Parks, Recreation & Human Services Department strives to keep our parks safe, accessible, and enjoyable for all and we are proud to continue to implement the parks capital program to better serve the Edmonds community. Sincerely, Ii \X Angie Feser, Edmonds Parks, Recreation & Human Services Director 425-771-0256 Angie.Feser@EdmondsWA.gov Page 2 Packet Pg. 240 2025-2030 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7.B.b Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site & Description 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total # Shell Creek Restoration Phase 2 R19 Project to provide improved environmental health and erosion control of Shell $ 380,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 380,00( Creek in Yost Park, may include trail, bridge and boardwalk repair or relocation. Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA *CARRYFORWARD* D19 Funding to support City of Mountlake Terrace Ballinger Park Phase III $ 200,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 200,00( Development. Payment due upon completion of project. Columbarium Expansion - Phase II D8 Expansion of the current columbarium. Funding provided through the Cemetery $ 175,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 175,00( Trust Fund 137. Mee Property X P2 Master plan and future development providing expansion of the Mathay $ 80,000 $ $ 250,000 $ $ $ $ 330,00( D13 Ballinger neighborhood park. Property purchased in 2024. Johnson Property X Master plan for future use and expansion of Yost Park. Site development not $ $ 100,000 $ $ $ $ $ 100,00( P5 included in estimate. Demolition, debris removal and site security completed in - - 2023. Parks & Facilities Maintenance and Operations Building X P1 Replace and/or renovate Parks & Facilities Maintenance Shop located in City $ $ 250,000 $ 875,500 $ 4,700,000 $ $ $ 5,825,50( D2 Park. Preliminary design in 2026. Marsh Boardwalk Replacement D21 Renovation and replacement of northwest Edmonds Marsh boardwalk to include $ $ 75,000 $ 750,000 $ - $ $ $ 825,00( R20 ADA upgrades. Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation R11 Repairs and renovations of 50+year old pool as needed to include a complete $ $ - $ 350,000 $ $ $ $ 350,00( replaster of the pool. Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting X D20 In cooperation with the Edmonds School District, complete a community park $ $ $ 1,500,000 $ $ $ $ 1,500,00( and athletic complex at Former Woodway High School to include lighting and future construction of two additional fields. Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) to U C IL IL U_ c ltf IL W W LL Q ca U O CM O N u7 N O N H LL ILL C] a U I a U W Y M IL O Cl) O N N O N c W E s U M r Q Page 3 Packet Pg. 241 7.B.b 2025-2030 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Costs inflated at 3% per year Project CFP Project Site & Description 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total # Sierra Park R8 Replacement of a 25+ year old playground and related improvements to included $ $ $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ $ $ 400,00( ADA compliance. D10 Pine Street Park D11 Park enhancements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, $ $ $ $ 100,000 $ 60,000 $ 200,000 $ 360,00( D12 canopy shade trees and a paved connecting pathway. Maplewood Hill Park R12 Replacement of a nearly 40 year old playground for improved play experience $ $ $ $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ 400,00( and ADA compliance. Neighborhood Park SR99 X D15 Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast $ $ $ $ $ 80,000 $ 850,000 $ 930,00( Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase). D16 Elm Street Park D17 Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, small shelter $ $ $ $ $ 105,000 $ 385,000 $ 490,00( R14 with picnic tables, habitat restoration and possible addition of a dog park. Neighborhood Park SE 2 X Master plan and development of a new neighborhood park in Southeast $ $ $ $ $ $ 82,000 $ 82,00( D18 Edmonds (funding is in Parkland Acquisition program for purchase). Pool Replacement X R15 Replacement of the existing Yost pool due to end of life cycle. Design, location, $ $ $ $ $ $ 24,000,000 $ 24,000,00( and funding TBD and consideration of possible partnerships. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) Master Plan development and implementation of the Edmonds Marsh to P4 daylight the waterway connection of Puget Sound to the Edmonds Marsh and X D9 two fresh water creeks providing restoration of fresh water/salt water estuary TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD $ - D1 and natural tidal exchange. (All expenses are TBD per Council direction in December 2022). Property acquisition identified in Parkland Acquisition program. (A) SUBTOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP PROJECTS $ 835,000 $ 425,000 $ 3,775,500 $ 5,200,000 $ 595,000 $ 25,517,000 $ 36,347,50( Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) R ..1 R U C a LL U_ C CU IL N LL Q ca U O M O N u7 N O N H LL Q 0 a LL U I a_ U Y M IL 0 M 0 N u7 N O N C N E s c� co r Q Page 4 Packet Pg. 242 7.B.b 2025-2030 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Costs inflated at 3% per year Project PARKS CIP PROGRAMS 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program Ongoing program of funding allocation for regular, major and deferred R17 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,700,00( maintenance, repair and replacement of parks amenities, structures and equipment. ADA Improvements & Replacement R16 Ongoing replacement or improvements to meet ADA standards within park $ $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ $ $ $ 500,001 system. (Example is of the Seaview Park restroom replacement and - - - - improvements to pathway). Debt Service and Interfund Transfers Debt service on Civic Park $1.6M bond (2021), Marina Beach Acquisition and $ 412,518 $ 416,188 $ 410,438 $ 416,350 $ 407,912 $ 414,225 $ 2,477,631 Interfund transfers to Engineering for Capital Project Support. (B) SUBTOTAL - PARKS CIP PROGRAMS $ 862,518 $ 1,066,188 $ 1,160,438 $ 866,350 $ 857,912 $ 864,225 $ 5,677,631 Costs inflated at 3% per year Project PARKLAND ACQUISITION 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total X A3 Neighborhood Park SR99 $ $ $ $ 900,000 $ - $ $ 900,00( Acquisition of parkland near SR 99 to fill park system gaps. X A4 Neighborhood Park SE 2 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,001 Acquisition of parkland in South Edmonds to fill park system gaps. Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Willow Creek Daylighting) X Al Acquisition of the Unocal property in support of greater Edmonds Marsh TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD $ restoration project. (C) SUBTOTAL - PARKLAND ACQUISITION 1 $ - $ - $ $ 900,000 $ 900,000 1 $ $ 1,800,001 R .r .Q m U C a LL U_ C IL rn N LL M .Q La U O M 0 N LO N O N H LL 0 a LL UI a_ U rn Y L M IL 0 M O N LO (D) TOTAL PARKS CIP/CFP EXPENDITURES (A+B+C) $ 1,697,518 $ 1,491,188 $ 4,935,938 $ 6,966,350 $ 2,352,912 $ 26,381,225 $ 43,825,131 N Project Type: A: Acquisition - R: Replacement/Upgrade - P: Master Planning - D: Development (new) N E s c� La r Page 5 Q Packet Pg. 243 7.B.b 2025-2030 SIX -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PARKS CIP REVENUE 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126 $ 512,518 $ 516,188 $ 510,438 $ 516,350 $ 507,912 $ 514,225 $ 3,077,63( Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125 $ 1,110,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 910,000 $ 950,000 $ 6,145,00( Park Impact Fees - Fund 332-100 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,00( Tree Fund 143 - Land Acquisition $ 70,152 $ 45,749 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 315,90' Cemetery Trust Fund 137 - Columbarium Expansion $ 175,000 $ 175,00( Investment Interest (3%) $ 7,870 $ 8,220 $ 35,132 $ 34,363 $ 46,081 $ 54,385 $ 186,051 Donations $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Bond Proceeds $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Secured Grants $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Unsecured Grants/Funding - non -land acquisition $ $ $ 3,125,000 $ 4,700,000 $ 55,000 $ 24,167,000 $ 32,047,001 (E) TOTAL PARKS CIP REVENUE $ 2,075,540 $ 1,845,157 $ 5,070,569 1 $ 6,450,713 1 $ 1,768,993 $ 25,935,610 $ 43,146,58: Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 (F) Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,458,932 $ 1,846,994 $ 2,211,633 $ 2,350,684 $ 1,842,187 $ 1,268,265 (E) Revenue $ 2,075,540 $ 1,845,157 $ 5,070,569 $ 6,450,713 $ 1,768,993 $ 25,935,610 (D) Expenditures $ 1,701,518 $ 1,495,188 $ 4,939,938 $ 6,970,350 $ 2,556,912 $ 26,385,225 (G) Ending Fund Balance (F+E-D) $ 1,832,954 $ 2,196,963 $ 2,342,265 $ 1,831,047 $ 1,054,268 $ 818,650 Restricted Land Acquisition Funds: $ 1,352,583 $ 1,509,002 $ 1,663,421 $ 920,561 $ 180,557 $ 333,554 Available Funding (assuming $2001(in PIF + Interest): $ 480,371 $ 687,961 $ 678,844 $ 910,486 $ 873,711 $ 485,096 Page 6 M .Q m U C a ILL U_ c a W N M LL Q M U O M O N u7 N O FI Packet Pg. 244 I 7.B.b I 2025-2030 Parks Capital Improvement Program & Capital Facilities Plan PROJECTS ti t v EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES r LL Li a LL U I a_ U L a 0 M 0 N LO N O N C d E U a Page 8 Packet Pg. 246 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Shell Creek Restoration Phase 2 - R19 Shell Creek Valley, Yost Park Project Summary: The goal of this project is the restoration of the northern portion of Yost Park and may include habitat and environmental protection and enhancement, mitigation opportunities, bridge, trail and boardwalk replacement/relocation and concrete structure removal or modification. After completion of the Existing Conditions Analysis, funding is needed for the next phase which includes scope of work development and may include architecture, engineering and ecological design, document development to support and start the permit process and potential construction estimates. Project Justification: The 45-acre Yost Park, containing a portion of Shell Creek, is experiencing environmental degradation to the creek's ecosystem and the bridges are nearing end of life cycle. Shell Creek is identified as a salmon -bearing stream and erosion and silting issues within Yost Park impact stream bed conditions and spawning habitat within the park and downstream. This erosion has caused the closure of a pedestrian bridge in the upper creek corridor, resulting in significant impact to trail users by lack of ability to cross the creek to access both sides of the park. Additional pedestrian bridges are deteriorating and will require replacement or repair. 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan - Goal 3: Parks, Trails & Open Space, Objectives 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4: Waterfront Use & Access, Objectives 4.2 and 4.4; Goal 5: Natural Resource & Habitat Conservation Objectives, 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6: Climate Change, Adaptation & Resiliency, Objective 6.5; and Goal 9: Park Operations & Administration Objectives 9.1 and 9.2. PROS Plan Recommendations 3.1, 3.10. 5.2 and 6.2. Estimated Cost: Phase 1- $250,000 & Phase 2 - $380,000 = $630,000 total Construction (R19) — Bridge, Trail, Stream 2025 20261 $380,000 MOY4:1111111111111111MOM 2030 Total $380,000 Total Expenses $380,000 $380,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II — Fund 125 $380,000 $380,000 Total Revenue $380,000 $630,000 FundingUnsecured 1 H u_ a 0 a u_ U I a_ U a O M O N LO N O N C d E M U a Page 9 Packet Pg. 247 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Lake Ballinger Park/Mountlake Terrace ILA - D19 Interurban Trail Improved Park Entry Proposed Crossing by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Senior Center l Proposed Channel by the )halt Path y U.S. Army Corps of Engineers �r 6 ft Wood Chips Path 4k r y 6 ft Gravel Path -rsAW Proposed Boardwalk by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Boardwalk & Viewing Platform Lake Ballinger Lake Ballinger Park, City of Mountlake Terrace Project Summary: Through an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) with the City of Mountlake Terrace, the City of Edmonds will cat support the construction of the planned improvements in the northwest area of Lake Ballinger Park including a pedestrian c entry, pathways and access to Lake Ballinger. The ILA was executed in 2023, with the project underway and payment is due upon completion. LL Q Project Justification: This western boundary of the park is Edmonds city limits, and these improvements will provide better o access to Lake Ballinger Park for Edmonds residents. The revenue contribution supports the construction of the LL improvements which will benefit the City of Edmonds. This project is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open vl a Space (PROS) Plan including a goal, three objectives and three recommendations. PROS Goal 3, Objectives 3.2, 3.8 and v 3.11. Recommendation 1.2 Expand partnerships and agreements with other nearby jurisdictions. Recommendation 3.6 ,0 L Explore options for access to Lake Ballinger with the City of Mountlake Terrace to include possible joint development and consideration of a fishing pier. Recommendation 5.2 Repair and improve or extend trails and boardwalks to allow M improved public access to natural areas for nature/wildlife viewing, hiking and outdoor experience. N LO N Estimated Cost: $200,000 c N Construction (D19) — ILA 1 126 $200,000 2027 20281 1 1 Total $200,000 Total Expenses $200,000 $200,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $200,000 $200,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $200,000 so $200,000 $0 d E U .r a Page 10 Packet Pg. 248 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Columbarium Expansion Phase 2 - D8 LL 820 15th St SW, Edmonds Memorial Cemetery a Project Summary: Expansion of the existing Edmonds Memorial Cemetery Columbarium. Funding is provided through the LS) Cemetery Trust Fund 137 which is designated for capital projects such as this. This accumulated fund balance is generated c from revenue collected through ongoing cemetery sales and services. LO Project Justification: As the existing columbarium continues to fill up, it is appropriate to begin planning for the Phase 2 N expansion to accommodate additional inurnments. The project design was developed with the original design and LL therefore, could be relatively simple to implement. 0 a u_ U Estimated Cost: $159,100 a U L a 0 M O N LO N O N a Page 11 Packet Pg. 249 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Mee Property - P2, D13 24024 76th Ave. Project Summary: This project is the Master Planning process supporting development of the recently acquired Mee Property adjacent to and expanding Mathay Ballinger Park. This planning effort is the next step to providing improvements to expand the adjacent park and address park services gap and inequities in geographic distribution in underserved areas of Edmonds. The Master Plan relies on community engagement and will be developed in collaboration with Edmonds community. Opening this property to the public requires site improvements determined by a community -based Master Plan. Project Justification: The addition of new parkland and amenities is supported by the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan including Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10; Goal 5, Objectives 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4; and Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.3, and 6.4. Recommendations include 6.2 which supports development of a new park and recommendations 3.2 and 3.5. Estimated Cost: $330,000 Planning —Neighborhood Park SE 1 (P2) 2025 $80,000 20261 128 2029 2030, $80,000 Construction — Neighborhood Park SE 1 (D13) $250,000 $250,000 Total Expenses $80,000 $250,000 $330,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $80,000 $80,000 Park Impact Fees — Fund 332-100 $250,000 $250,000 Total Revenue $80,000 $250,000 $330,000 Unsecured Funding i 1 i *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) u_ Q o: 0 a u_ tU a� U N L a 0 M O N LO N O N c m E s v M Q Page 12 Packet Pg. 250 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Johnson Property - P5 9309 Bowdoin Way Project Summary: This project is for the first phase of design including a Master Plan for the 1-acre property donated by Shirley Johnson in 2021. The house, outbuildings and invasive plants material were removed in 2023 and the site is currently secured with fencing. The master planning process uses a combination of park system -wide goals (PROS Plan), property opportunities and constraints, property donation conditions and community input on future design and usage for the space as well as providing documentation for grant opportunities for future improvements. Project Justification: This project is supported by five goals and 11 related objectives and a recommendation of the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. They include Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objectives 3.7, 3.8 and 3.10; Goal 5, Objective 5.1; Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5; Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.5 support this project. In addition, Plan Recommendation 3.1 - Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety applies to this work. Estimated Cost: $100,000 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) U_ Q o: 0 a U_ U a_ U N L c� a 0 M O N LO N O N C d E s 0 c� w Q Page 13 Packet Pg. 251 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building - P1 & D2 6003 d Avenue South, City Park Project Summary: Replacement of 40+ year old Parks and Facilities Maintenance building and renovation of the yard area in City Park. Currently undersized to accommodate staff, vehicles and equipment, mechanical workspaces and employee facilities and the facility is reaching the end of its useful life. Project Justification: Parks and Facilities Divisions have long outgrown this existing facility and need additional work areas and fixed equipment storage to more efficiently maintain City parks and Capital facilities. The city's small equipment repair garage is used as the Park Maintenance locker room, daily meeting room, computer access (two for 17 FTEs) and work preparation space. It is insufficient for work efficiency and creates a conflicting workspace of small machinery repair and gathering space. This project is supported by a Goals and three Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan including Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.3 and 9.9. Estimated Cost: $5,825,000 Planning & Design (P1) 2025 20261 $250,000 $875,000 128 2029 2030 Total $1,125,000 Construction (D2) $4,700,000 $4,700,000 Total Expenses $250,000 $875,000 $4,700,000 $5,825,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $250,000 $250,000 Bond Proceeds Operating Contribution —General Fund Park Donations Total Revenue $250,000 $250,000 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) u_ Q o: 0 a u_ tU I a_ U N L c� a 0 M O N LO N O N c m E t 0 M w Q Page 14 Packet Pg. 252 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Marsh Boardwalk Replacement - D21, R20 S •at�r •twe -� il� 180 West Dayton, Edmonds Marsh Project Summary: Initial work for repair and possible replacement of the failing Marsh Boardwalk. Work may include evaluation of existing structure, architecture and engineering design for repair or replacement, development of construction drawings and the start of a complex permitting process. Project Justification: The deck of the wooden boardwalk is nearing the end of its useful life and the supporting structure and footings may be starting to settle into the underlying marsh. If this repair/replacement is not completed, there may need to be closed to the public due to unsafe surface conditions and trip hazards. 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan - Goal 3: Parks, Trails & Open Space, Objectives 3.4, 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4: Waterfront Use & Access, Objectives 4.2 and 4.4; Goal 5: Natural Resource & Habitat Conservation Objectives, 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6: Climate Change, Adaptation & Resiliency, Objective 6.1, 6.4 and 6.5; and Goal 9: Park Operations & Administration Objectives 9.1 and 9.5. PROS Plan Recommendations 3.1 and 3.10, 5.2 and 6.2. Estimated Cost: $825,000 12026 20271 1 2030 .. Planning & Design (D21) $75,000 $75,000 Construction (1120) $750,000 $750,000 Total Expenses $75,000 $750,000 $825,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $75,000 $75,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $75,000 $0 ($750,000) $75,000 ($750,000) u_ 0 a u_ U I a_ U a 0 M 0 N LO N 0 N c m E U a Page 15 Packet Pg. 253 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation - R11 96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park Project Summary: Future pool repair and maintenance to include a full replaster project. Project Justification: The outdoor Yost Pool, built in the early 1970's, is more than 50 years old and has numerous maintenance needs to enable the pool to remain operational and meet safety requirements. These repairs and amenity replacements are supported in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan including Goal 1, Objective 1.4; Goal 2, Objective 2.1, Goal 3, Objectives 3.6, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4, Objective 4.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.3; Goal 7, Objectives 7.2 and 7.4; Goal 9, Objectives 9.1 and 9.5 and Recommendation 3.1, and 6.2. Estimated Cost: $350,000 Construction (1111) i is 2029 $350,000 2030 Total $350,000 Total Expenses $350,000 $350,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $350,000 $350,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $350,000 1 $350,000 1 Page 16 Packet Pg. 254 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase 1 Lighting - D20 23200 100th Ave. W Project Summary: This project consists of two components: Phase 1 lighting addition, Phase 2 renovation of existing underdeveloped athletic field and would be coordinated with the property owner, Edmonds School District. Project Justification: By adding lighting to the renovated Phase 1 year-round field, usage of the multi -use facility would significantly increase. Phase 2 would renovate a currently poorly maintained and underutilized large athletic field to provide community significantly more multi -sport use of an existing facility. This Athletic Complex serves a densely populated area of more than 150,000 residents within 5-mile radius. Future maintenance costs could be offset by user fees. Phase I without lighting installation was completed in 2015 for $4.2M, Phase II estimated at $6-8M with funding and timing undetermined. This partnership improvement is supported by a Recommendation, 2 Goals and 5 Objectives in the 2022 PROS Plan including Recommendation 3.2 "expand partnerships and agreements with Edmonds School District ... to provide public access and opportunities for outdoor recreation". And PROS Plan Goal 3, Objectives 3.3, 3.9, 3.10 and 3.11; and Goal 9, Objective 9.4. Estimated Cost: Phase 1 Lighting: $1,500,000; Phase 2: $6 — 8M 2025 20261 Construction (D20) - Lighting $1,500,000 128 2029 2030 Tot $1,500,000 Total Expenses $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 7 Park Impact Fees — Fund 332-100 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $0 MIM11IM111111MI $0 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 17 I— LL Q 0 a LL U I a_ U �a a 0 M O N L! N O N r.+ c a� E t v R a Packet Pg. 255 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Sierra Park - R8 81st Ave W & 190th St SW Project Summary: Replacement of the playground and fall surfacing at Sierra Park. The playground is 27 years old and is currently the smallest and most limited playground in the park system. The new playground will be ADA accessible and could be an inclusive level design. Project Justification: These improvements are supported by three Goals and Objectives and two Recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. The improvement project is supported by Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8, Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.1. In addition, Recommendation 3.4 states "replace the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park". Estimated Cost: $400,000 Construction (R8) — Playground Replacement 125 � 2026 20271 1 $50,000 $350,000 2030 Total $400,000 Total Expenses $50,000 $350,000 $400,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $50,000 $350,000 $400,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $50,000 $350,000 1 1 $400,000 so u_ a 0 a u_ U I a_ U L a 0 M 0 N Lh N 0 N c d E U a Page 18 Packet Pg. 256 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Pine Street Park - D10, D11 & D12 6th and Pine Street Project Summary: Park improvements to include the addition of a small shelter with picnic tables, canopy shade trees and a paved interior connecting pathway. Project Justification: These improvements are supported by 2 Recommendations, 2 Goals and 2 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 3.5 is to add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park and paved pathway connections in Mathay Ballinger Park and Pine Street Park. PROS Plan Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with these improvements. Estimated Cost: $360,000 Construction (D10) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables $100,000 030 Total $100,000 Construction (D11) — Paved Pathway $35,000 $200,000 $235,000 Construction (D12) — Canopy Shade Trees $25,000 $25,000 Total Expenses $100,000 $60,000 $200,000 $360,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $100,000 $60,000 $200,000 $360,000 Total Revenue $100,000 $60,000 $200,000 $360,000 Page 19 Packet Pg. 257 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Maplewood Hill Park — R12 19800 89th PI W Project Summary: Replacement of the existing playground installed in 1985. This playground is 38 years old and is the oldest in the park system. Project Justification: This improvement is supported by three Goals and Objectives as well as two Recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objective 3.8; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendation 3.1 also align with this improvement. Recommendation 3.4 specifically states "replace the playgrounds at Maplewood Hill Park, Sierra Park and Yost Memorial Park". Estimated Cost: $400,000 Construction (R12) — Playground Replacement 2025 20261 128 $50,000 L 2029 $350,000 2030 Total $400,000 Total Expenses $50,000 $350,000 $400,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $50,000 $350,000 $400,000 Total Revenue $50,000 $350,000 $400,000 Unsecured Funding 1 1 a Page 20 Packet Pg. 258 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Park SR 99 - P6 & D15 Project Summary: Design and development of an additional neighborhood park in the SR 99 area to address an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition has been authorized (see Land Acquisition Section for details) a Master Plan should be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Eventual development of the park will be based on the Master Plan. Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by three Goals and 11 Objectives two recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 also align with the development of a new park. Recommendation 1 states "to fill the park system gaps ... 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor". Estimated Cost: $930,000 + Parkland Acquisition Planning —Neighborhood Park SR99 (P6) 2025 20261 128 2029 $80,000 2030 Total $80,000 Construction — Neighborhood Park SR 99 (D15) $850,000 $850,000 Total Expenses $80,000 $850,000 $930,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Park Impact Fees — Fund 332-100 $80,000 $850,000 $930,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $80,000 $850,000 $930,000 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 21 Packet Pg. 259 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Elm Street Park - D16, D17 & R14 7th & Elm Street Project Summary: Park enhancements to include the addition of a nature playground, small shelter with picnic tables, habitat restoration and public process to consider possible off -leash dog park area. Project Justification: These improvements are supported by two Goals and Objectives and two Recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. PROS Plan Goal 6, Objective 6.5; Goal 9, Objective 9.1; and Recommendation 3.5 support these improvements. Recommendation 3.1 is to "add amenities to existing parks, such as picnic shelters to Mathay Ballinger Park, Elm Street Park and Pine Street Park". Estimated Cost: $490,000 Construction (R14) — Habitat Restoration 2025 20261 128 2029 $55,000 2030- $55,000 Construction (D16) — Nature Play & Dog park $50,000 $300,000 $350,000 Construction (D17) — Shelter w/Picnic Tables $85,000 $85,000 Total Expenses $105,000 $385,000 $490,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 1 1 $50,000 $300,000 $3501,000 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $50,000 111 $300,000 111 $350,000 41 111 F_ u_ a 0 a u_ U I a_ U a 0 M 0 N LO N 0 N C d E M U a Page 22 Packet Pg. 260 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Neighborhood Park SE 2 - P7, D18 Project Summary: Design and future development of an additional neighborhood park in the SE Edmonds area to address an existing gap in park services and inequities in parkland distribution. Once an acquisition (see Land Acquisition Section for details) has been authorized a Master Plan will be developed in collaboration with the surrounding community. Development of the park will be based on the Master Plan. Project Justification: The addition of a new park is supported by three Goals and 11 Objectives and two Recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan including Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3, Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 and 3.10 and Recommendation 6.2 support the development of a new park. Recommendation 1 states "to fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor". Estimated Cost: $82,000 + Parkland Acquisition 2025 20261 128 2029 2030 Total Planning — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (P7) $82,000 $82,000 Construction — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (D18) Total Expenses $82,000 $82,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding 111 111 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 23 Packet Pg. 261 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Yost Pool Replacement - R15 96th Ave W & Bowdoin Way, Yost Park Project Summary: Yost Pool was built nearly 50 years ago and continues to provide recreational opportunities for many residents and visitors. In addition to teaching youth lifesaving water safety, the pool serves as an opportunity for community members of all ages to lead healthy and active lifestyles. Funding for this project has not been identified, may need partnerships and would likely require voter approval. Project Justification: Replacing Yost Pool is supported by four Goals and six Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan lists Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 3, Objectives 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 7, Objective 7.4; Goal 9, Objective 9.1 and Recommendations 3.1, 4.1, 4.2 and 6.2. Recommendation 4 actually states "replace Yost Pool". Estimated Cost: $24,000,000 Planning & Construction (1115) 2025 2026 2027is 2029 2030 Total $24,000,000 $24,000,000 Total Expenses $24,000,000 $24,000,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees Secured Grants Bonds Total Revenue Unsecured Funding $0 $0 ($24,000,000) ($24,000,000) *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) u_ Q G a u_ tU I a_ U N a 0 M 0 N LO N 0 N c m E t t� ca w Q Page 24 Packet Pg. 262 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Edmonds Marsh -Estuary Expansion & Restoration - Al, P4, D9 & D1 Edmonds Marsh - City of Edmonds Marsh, Marina Beach Park and property owned by Unocal (Chevron) Project Summary: Reconnect the Puget Sound with the Edmonds Marsh near -shore estuary by restoring the natural tidal exchange. This project will impact the existing Marina Beach Park and its proposed renovation including daylighting of Willow Creek within the park and the Edmonds Marsh. In addition, this project encompasses the possible acquisition or use of the adjacent 21-acre parcel known as the Unocal property to support a larger estuary restoration project. Once acquired, an integrated restoration plan can be developed to restore functioning conditions of the tidal wetland for salmon recovery, wildlife conservation and improved public access for recreational use, environmental education and wildlife viewing. Project Justification: The marsh estuary restoration project will allow for and provide a natural tidal exchange, allow salmon to again migrate into Willow Creek, support migratory birds and waterfowl, provide a natural redistribution of saltwater -freshwater flora and fauna and address sea level rise impacts. This project is supported by 3 Recommendations, 5 Goals and 8 Objectives in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Recommendation 2.2 — Expand the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary to include the Unocal property. Develop funding strategy for purchase of the Unocal property or negotiate with the State of Washington to have the property become part of the Edmonds Marsh/Estuary. PROS Plan Goal 1, Objective 1.1; Goal 4, Objective 4.3; Goal 5, Objectives 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4; Goal 6, Objective 6.5 and 6.7; Goal 9, Objective 9.1; Recommendation 2.1 and 3.11 also align with this project. Estimated Cost: TBD Acquisition and Planning + Restoration + Marina Beach Park renovation Continued on next page. U_ Q o: 0 a U_ tU a_ U N L c� a 0 M O N LO N O N m E t 0 c� w Q Page 25 Packet Pg. 263 7.B.b Edmonds Marsh -Estuary Expansion & Restoration— continued. Land Acquisition (Al) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD 030 TBD Total TBD Master Plan (P4) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Master Plan Implementation (D9) TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Restoration (D1) - TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Total Expenses TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 Real Estate Excise Tax I — Fund 126 Fund 332 Balance + Park Impact Fees Bond Proceeds Secured Grants Tree Fund 143 — Land Acquisition Park Donations Operating Contribution —General Fund Stormwater— Fund 422 Total Revenue Unsecured Funding TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD Project Accounting #M070 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Expense estimates and funding sources changed to TBD per Council direction December 2022. Page 26 Packet Pg. 264 I 7.B.b I 2024-2029 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan PROGRAMS Y EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES a Page 27 Packet Pg. 265 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program - R17 t L.f Project Summary: The 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) plan identified a significant list of deferred park maintenance projects. With the addition of a Parks Capital Project Manager, hired in 2022 and the Job Order Contracting program, the Parks Department will continue to make progress on the numerous system -wide repairs, renovations and replacements of an aging parks infrastructure and ADA accessibility. Project Justification: Insufficiently maintained parks and related assets lead to higher deferred maintenance costs, increased City liability and decreased level of service and community satisfaction. This program is supported by six Goals and 21 Objectives and five Recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Opens Space (PROS) Plan. These include Goal 2, Objectives 2.1 and 2.3; Goal 3, Objectives 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9; Goal 4, Objectives 4.1, 4.2, and 4.4; Goal 5, Objectives 5.1, 5.3, and 5.4; Goal 6, Objectives 6.1, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5 and 6.7; and Goal 9, Objectives 9.1, 9.2, 9.3 and 9.9. Recommendation 3.1 is "Maintain, renovate, or replace aging or damaged infrastructure in existing City properties to ensure public accessibility, use and safety' and additional recommendations are found in 3.7, 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4. Estimated Cost: $2,700,000 (6-year total) 2025 20261 128 2029 2030 Total Repair & Maintenance $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,800,000 Professional Services $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $900,000 Total Expenses $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000 Real Estate Excise Tax II - Fund 125 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,700,000 Total Revenue 1 $450,000 1 Unsecured Funding 1 $450,000 1 $450,000 1 1 1 $450,000 1 1 $450,000 1 $450,000 1 so 1 $2,700,000 1 u_ Q G a u_ tU I a U N L c� IL 0 M O N LO N 0 N c m E t v M Q Page 28 Packet Pg. 266 7.B.b Parks & Recreation ADA Improvements / Replacement - R16 Project Summary: Systemic accessibility installations, upgrades, replacements and or renovations are needed throughout the City of Edmonds parks, open spaces, trails and recreation facilities and amenities. Examples of projects include Seaview Park restroom access and pathway to the playground, ADA compliant access in the Marina Beach Park dog park and Edmonds Marsh viewing pier and platform and among other numerous projects throughout the city parks and city -owned public spaces. This funding to be used for professional design, permits and arranging construction of these projects. Project Justification: In addition to building code compliance and ADA requirements, these improvements are supported by three goals and objectives and three recommendations in the 2022 Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan. Included are Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objectives 3.3, 3.7, 3.8 and 3,9; and Goal 9, Objective 9.1. Recommendations 3.1 "ensuring public accessibility" and 6.2 includes "improvements to park facilities to conform with American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and ensure universal accessibility". In addition, recommendation 6.3 is to replace or renovate restrooms at Olympic Beach, Seaview Park and Brackett's Landing North. Estimated Cost: $500,000 I— U_ Q o: 0 a U_ U I a U N L c� IL 0 M O N Ln N O N C d E L 0 �4 w Q Page 29 Packet Pg. 267 I 7.B.b I 2024-2029 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan PARKLAND ACQUISITION EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Page 30 Packet Pg. 268 7.B.b Parks & Recreation Parkland Acquisition - Neighborhood Park SR 99 & SE 2 - A3 & A4 Project Summary: Acquisition of parkland that will benefit the Edmond community and support the priorities identified in the PROS Plan. Currently, $1,140,625 is reserved for parkland and open space acquisition. These funds were accumulated from 2019 through 2024. There is no specific request to purchase a particular parcel as opportunities are somewhat limited in a mostly built -out city, but staff continues to search for, develop and negotiate opportunities. Project Justification: Parkland acquisitions are supported by two Goals and five Objectives (land purchase only, see previous projects for development) and a Recommendation in the 2022 Parks, Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan. Those include Goal 2, Objective 2.1; Goal 3, Objectives 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and 3.9 also support the acquisition of parkland. Recommendation 1 is to "Fill the park system gaps, 1.1 Acquire property for neighborhood parks in underserved areas such as the south Edmonds area and the SR 99 corridor". Estimated Cost: $1,800,000 Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SR99 (A3) 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $900,000 Total $900,000 Acquisition — Neighborhood Park SE 2 (A4) $900,000 $900,000 Total Expenses $900,000 $900,000 $1,800,000 Real Estate Excise Tax I - Fund 126 $900,000 $700,000 $1,600,000 Tree Fund 143 - land acquisition - TBD $200,000 $200,000 Snohomish County Conservation Futures Total Revenue $900,000 $900,000 $1,800,000 *Project is both in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) Page 31 Packet Pg. 269 I 7.B.b I 2024-2029 Parks Capital Improvement & Capital Facilities Plan FUND DETAIL r EDMONDS PARKS, RECREATION & HUMAN SERVICES Page 32 Packet Pg. 270 7.B.b Fund 332 Costs inflated at 3% per year Fund 332 Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total D9 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan Implementation) $ D1 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Restoration) $ - R14 Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration $ 55,000 $ 55,000 D17 Elm Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ 85,000 $ 85,000 R20 Marsh Boardwalk Replacement $ 750,000 $ 750,000 D13 Mee Property (Park Development) $ 250,000 $ 250,000 D15 Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Park Development) $ 80,000 $ 850,000 $ 930,000 D18 Neighborhood Park - SE2 (Park Development) $ 82,000 $ 82,000 R15 Pool Replacement $24,000,000 $ 24,000,000 P1 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design) $ 875,500 $ 875,500 D2 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Construction) $ 4,700,000 $ 4,700,000 D20 Woodway Campus Athletic Complex - Phase I - Lighting $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 (C) TOTAL Fund 332 Expenditures $ $ $ 3,375,500 $ 4,700,000 $ 135,000 1 $25,017,000 $33,227,500 Fund 332 Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total Park Impact Fees (Fund 332-100) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,200,000 Miscellaneous Park Donations $ - Bond Proceeds $ - Park Impact Fees - Mee Property (Park Development) $ 250,000 $ 250,000 Park Impact Fees - Neighborhood Park SR99 (Development) $ 80,000 $ 850,000 $ 930,000 Unsecured Funding - Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase 1 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 Unsecured Grants - Marsh Estuary Restoration $ - Unsecured Grants - Elm Street Park Habitat Restoration & Shelter $ 55,000 $ 85,000 $ 140,000 Unsecured Grants - Neighborhood Park SE 2 (Development) $ 82,000 $ 82,000 Unsecured Funding (Bonds, Levy, Misc.) Pool Replacement $ 24,000,000 $ 24,000,000 Unsecured Funding Park Facilities M&O Building $ 875,000 $ 4,700,000 $ 5,575,000 Unsecured Grants - Marsh Walkway Replacement $ 750,000 $ 750,000 (D) TOTAL Fund 332 Revenue $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 3,575,000 $ 4,900,000 $ 335,000 $25,217,000 $37,357,000 Fund 332 Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 (E) Beginning Fund Balance (332) $ 106,309 $ 110,729 $ 115,349 $ 120,617 $ 126,648 $ 132,980 (F) Investment Interest (5%) $ 4,420 $ 4,620 $ 5,767 $ 6,031 $ 6,332 $ 6,649 (D) Revenue - Non Park Impact Fees $ - $ - $ 3,375,000 $ 4,700,000 $ 135,000 $25,017,000 (C) Expenditures $ $ - $ 3,375,500 $ 4,700,000 $ 135,0010 $25,017,000 (H) Ending Fund Balance (E+F+D-C) $ 110,729 1 $ 115,349 $ 120,617 $ 126,648 $ 132,980 $ 139,629 Q Page 33 Packet Pg. 271 Fund 332 7.B.b Fund 332-100 Fund Park Impact Fee 6-Year Overview 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 (E) Beginning Fund Balance (332-100) - Park Impact Fees $ 180,232 $ 383,682 $ 587,282 $ 566,646 $ 794,978 $ 954,727 (F) Investment Interest (5%) $ 3,450 $ 3,600 $ 29,364 $ 28,332 $ 39,749 $ 47,736 (D) Revenue - Park Impact Fees Only $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 (C) Expenditures $ - $ $ 250,000 $ - $ 80,000 $ 850,000 (I) Ending Fund Balance (E+F+D-C) $ 383,682 $ 587,282 $ 566,646 $ 794,978 $ 954,727 $ 352,464 Project Type: A Acquisition P Master Planning D Development - New R Replacement / Upgrade Page 34 Packet Pg. 272 REET II Fund 125 7.B.b Costs inflated at 3% per year REET II(Fund 125)Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total P4 Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Master Plan) $ - D16 Elm Street Park (Nature Playground & Dog Park) $ 50,000 $ 300,000 $ 350,000 P5 Johnson Property (Master Plan) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 R12 Maplewood Hill Park (Playground Replacement) $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ 400,000 R20 Marsh Boardwalk Replacement (Design) $ 75,000 $ 75,000 D19 Mountlake Terrace ILA (Lake Ballinger Park)* $ 200,000 $ 200,000 P2 Mee Property - (Master Plan) $ 80,000 $ 80,000 P1 Parks Facilities M&O Building (Design) $ 250,000 $ 250,000 D10 Pine Street Park (Shelter w/Picnic Tables) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 D11 Pine Street Park (Paved Connecting Pathway) $ 35,000 $ 200,000 $ 235,000 D12 Pine Street Park (Canopy Shade Trees) $ 25,000 $ 25,000 R19 Shell Creek Restoration Phase 2 (Yost Park) $ 380,000 $ 380,000 R8 Sierra Park (Playground Replacement) $ 50,000 $ 350,000 $ 400,000 R11 Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation $ 350,000 $ 350,000 R16 ADA Improvements (Seaview Restroom & Pathway) $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 500,000 R17 Citywide Park Improvements / Capital Replacement Program $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 450,000 $ 2,700,000 (C) TOTAL PARKS REET II (Fund 125) Expenditures $ 1,110,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 910,000 $ 950,000 $ 6,145,000 REET II(Fund 125)Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) II - Fund 125 $ 1,110,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 910,000 $ 950,000 $ 6,145,000 (D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue $ 1,110,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 910,000 $ 950,000 $ 6,145,000 REET II (Fund 125) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - (D) Revenue $ 1,110,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 910,000 $ 950,000 (C) Expenditures $ 1,110,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 1,150,000 $ 950,000 $ 910,000 $ 950,000 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ *Project added via Council amendment in 2023 Page 35 Packet Pg. 273 REET I Fund 126 7.B.b Costs inflated at 3% per year REET I(Fund 126)Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total Al Edmonds Marsh Estuary Restoration (Acquisition) $ A2 Neighborhood Park - SE1 (Acquisition) $ - A3 Neighborhood Park - SR99 (Acquisition) $ 900,000 $ 900,000 A4 Neighborhood Park -SE2 (Acquisition) $ 700,000 $ 700,000 Debt Interest & Principal (Civic & Marina Beach) $ 412,518 $ 416,188 $ 410,438 $ 416,350 $ 407,912 $ 414,225 $ 2,477,630 (C) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Expenditures $ 412,518 $ 416,188 $ 410,438 $ 1,316,350 $ 1,107,912 $ 414,225 $ 4,077-630 REET I(Fund 126)Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126 - Land Acquisition $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 600,000 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) I - Fund 126 - Debt Interest & Principal $ 412,518 $ 416,188 $ 410,438 $ 416,350 $ 407,912 $ 414,225 $ 2,477,630 (D) TOTAL PARKS REET I (Fund 126) Revenue $ 512,518 $ 516,188 $ 510,438 $ 516,350 $ 507,912 $ 514,225 $ 3,077,630 REET I (Fund 126) Parks Fund 6-Year Overview 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,140,625 $ 1,240,625 $ 1,340,625 $ 1,440,625 $ 640,625 $ 40,625 (D) Revenue $ 512,518 $ 516,188 $ 510,438 $ 516,350 $ 507,912 $ 514,225 (C) Expenditures $ 412,518 $ 416,188 $ 410,438 $ 1,316,350 $ 1,107,912 $ 414,225 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 1,240,625 $ 1,340,625 $ 1,440,625 $ 640,625 $ 40,625 $ 140,625 R Lo U Z3 C a LL U_ c Lo a N LL .r Q U O M O N L0 N O N H LL Q d' 0 a LL U I a_ U Y L M IL O M O N LO N O N C N E t 0 LC r Q Page 36 Packet Pg. 274 TREE Fund 143 7.B.b Costs inflated at 3% per year TREE (Fund 143)Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total Park and Open Space Acquisition Program $ Mee Property Acquisition $ - A4 Neighborhood Park -SE2 (Acquisition) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Tree Board Supplies and Minute Taker $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 24,000 (C) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Expenditures 1 $ 4,0001 $ 4,000 1 $ 4,0001 $ 4,000 1 $ 204,000 1 $ 4,000 1 $ 224,000 TREE (Fund 143)Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total Tree - Fund 143 $ 70,152 $ 45,749 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 315,901 Investment Interest (@5%) $ 14,040 $ 14,670 $ 8,419 $ 11,140 $ 13,997 $ 6,997 $ 69,262 (D) TOTAL TREE (Fund 143) Revenue $ 84,192 $ 60,419 $ 58,419 $ 61,140 $ 63,997 $ 56,997 $ 385,163 TREE (Fund 143) 6-Year Overview 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 31,766 $ 111,958 $ 168,377 $ 222,796 $ 279,936 $ 139,932 (D) Revenue $ 84,192 $ 60,419 $ 58,419 $ 61,140 $ 63,997 $ 56,997 (C) Expenditures $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 $ 204,000 $ 4,000 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 111,958 $ 168,377 $ 222,796 $ 279,936 $ 139,932 $ 192,929 to U C a ur U_ c Lo a rn d u_ .r Q LC U O M O N LO N O H u_ Q 0 a ur U I a_ U rn Y L M IL O M O N LO N O N C N E t t) LC r Q Page 37 Packet Pg. 275 CEMETERY Trust Fund 137 7.B.b Costs inflated at 3% per year CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Expenditures 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total D8 lColumbarium Expansion -Phase II $ 175,000 $ 175,000 Repair & Maintenance $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 150,000 (C) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust(Fund 137) Expenditures $ 200,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 325,000 CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 6-Year Total Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Investment Interest (@5%) $ 77,880 $ 81,400 $ 70,091 $ 73,145 $ 76,352 $ 79,720 $ 458,588 Cemetery Trust - Fund 137 Sales Revenue $ 18,540 $ 19,096 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 16,000 $ 101,636 (D) TOTAL CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) Revenue $ 96,420 $ 100,496 $ 86,091 $ 89,145 $ 92,352 $ 95,720 $ 560,224 CEMETERY Trust (Fund 137) 6-Year Overview 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 (E) Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,429,895 $ 1,326,315 $ 1,401,811 $ 1,462,902 $ 1,527,047 $ 1,594,399 (D) Revenue $ 96,420 $ 100,496 $ 86,091 $ 89,145 $ 92,352 $ 95,720 (C) Expenditures $ 200,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 (G) Ending Fund Balance (E+D-C) $ 1,326,315 $ 1,401,811 $ 1,462,902 $ 1,527,047 $ 1,594,399 $ 1,665,119 R to U C a ur U_ C tC a N LL C. LC U O M O N LO N O N I- LL ILL a U I a_ U Y L M IL O M O N LO N O N C N E t t) LC r Q Page 38 1 Packet Pg. 276 7.B.b PARKS CIP /CFP COMPARISON 2025 - 30 vs. 2024-29 PROJECTS ADDED Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION Parks ADA Improvements & Replacement Ongoing replacement or improvements to meet ADA Standards. Parks Marsh Boardwalk Replacement Renovation and replacement of NW Edmonds Marsh Boardwalk to include ADA upgrades. Parks Mee Property Master Plan X Was part of Parkland Acquisition, now stand alone project. PROJECTS REMOVED Type PROJECT NAME CFP DESCRIPTION Parks Interurban Trail Extension Removed due to lack of available funding. Parks Mathay Ballinger Park Project completion scheduled for 2024. Parks Neighborhood Park SE 1 Mee Property Purchased in 2024. Master Plan listed above as new item. Parks Olympic Beach Park Restroom Interior renovation completed. Parks Parkland Acquisition Support Removed, will be requested if/when potential acquisition is identified. Parks Signage & Wayfinding Project completion scheduled for 2024. Parks Waterfront Walkway (missing link) Removed due to lack of available funding and other capital priorities. Parks Yost Park Playground Improvements Project expenses deemed replacement as not feasible at this time. PROJECTS REVISED Type PROJECT NAME CFP CHANGE Parks Elm Street Park Improvements Moved to 2029-30 vs. 2028-29. Parks Johnson Property Master Plan X Expenditure estimate updated to reflect more current pricing. Parks Lake Ballinger Park Mountlake Terrace ILA ILA completed in 2023; payment due upon construction completion estimated for 2025, carryforward. Parks Maplewood Hill Park Improvements Moved to 2028-29 vs. 2027. Parks Neighborhood Park SE 2 X Acquisition moved to 2029 vs. 2026 and Master Plan moved to 2030 vs. 2027. Parks Neighborhood Park SR 99 X Acquisition moved to 2028 vs. 2025 and Master Plan/Construction moved to 2029-30 vs. 2026-27. Parks Parks & Facilities Maintenance Building X Construction shifted to 2028 vs. 2027; preliminary design funded via REST Fund 125. Parks Pine Street Park Improvements Moved to 2028, 29 & 30 vs. 2025-26. Parks Pool Replacement X Moved to 2030 vs. 2029. Parks lSeaview Park Restroom Replacement lMoved into ADA Improvements & Replacement Program 2026-2027 vs. 2028. Parks Sierra Park Improvements Moved to 2027-28 vs. 2026. Parks Woodway Campus Athletic Complex Phase 1 X Moved to 2027 vs. 2025 due to required ESD partnership development and coordination. Parks Yost Pool Upgrades & Renovation Moved to 2027 vs. 2025. Parks Yost Pool Replacement X Replacement of existing pool - moved to 2030 vs. 2029. Page 39 Packet Pg. 277 8.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/11/2024 Draft Recommendation on Green Building Incentives Staff Lead: Mike Clugston Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michael Clugston Background/History The Planning Board discussed this topic several times during 2024 and held a public hearing about it on June 12. The project is ready to move forward to review by City Council but needs a recommendation on the proposed code changes from the Planning Board. Staff Recommendation Discuss the draft recommendation on the Green Building Incentive code update and make a recommendation to City Council. Narrative NA Attachments: Draft Memo PB Green Building Recommendation to Council V.3 Packet Pg. 278 8.A.a DRAFT MEMO September 11, 2024 To: Edmonds City Council Members From: Edmonds Planning Board Members Subject: PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATION REGARDING GREEN BUILDING INCENTIVES Background The 2023 Edmonds Climate Action Plan included a provision that Edmonds could "create and implement a green building incentive program" (action BE-2.2). This was intended to address the fact that Edmonds' buildings produce a third of greenhouse gas emissions within Edmonds. (Edmonds 2017 GHG Inventory, p. 12). Green buildings reduce those greenhouse gas emissions as well as reduce electricity consumption. The program discussed in this memo implements action BE-2.2 of the Climate Action Plan. The Proposed Green Building Program The proposed Green Building Program provides developers incentives if they construct buildings that meet the requirements for a Built Green 4-star certification, and obtain that certification. Incentives The proposed incentives for the program include: • Expedited permit review • Additional 5 feet in height • Smaller setbacks, matching the setbacks of the next smallest zone (for example, an RS-12 site would have to meet RS-10 setbacks) • Reduced parking requirement to 1 space per unit • Additional 5% of structural lot coverage for ADUs Penalties If a developer participated in the program by constructing a building and received the incentives, but failed to obtain a certification, the builder would be penalized in the form of forfeiting to the City of Edmonds bonds equaling: • 50% of the building permit fee, and • 5% of the project valuation Planning Board Review and Public Comment The Planning Board met with staff from the Planning and Development Department on four separate occasions between January and July 2024 to discuss a staff proposal for a new Green Packet Pg. 279 8.A.a Building Incentives program. These Planning Board meetings included a public hearing held on June 12. Staff shared the objectives, proposed methods and desired outcomes of the program in presentations to the Board members. The Planning Board members discussed the program following the staff presentations. While Planning Board members thought staff performed sufficient research and outreach and involved the appropriate stakeholders, there was much discussion about the incentives and penalties proposed for the program. Staff provided refinements to the proposed penalties as a result of Planning Board input to have penalties that are appropriately scaled. Planning Board Recommendation At the July 24 Planning Board meeting, the Planning Board voted to recommend that City Council approve the proposed Green Building program. Packet Pg. 280 10.A Planning Board Agenda Item Meeting Date: 09/11/2024 Extended Agenda Staff Lead: Michael Clugston Department: Planning Division Prepared By: Michael Clugston Background/History N/A Staff Recommendation Discuss the attached extended agenda. Narrative N/A Attachments: September 11 Extended Agenda Packet Pg. 281 10.A.a Planning Board Extended Agenda - September 11, 2024 cn -1 N CL Q O -1 Q (V > 6 2 00 N (V N rl lD (V O -1 (V Q ri Q 00 (V Q N cn L1 N u Ql c� O M (V O Z cn rl O Z00 r� (V U v -1 U N l6 ri U v Lf1 N Ln o \ -4 N N 00 NCL N lD (V N rl l6 N Q Q rV Q cn N Comprehensive Plan Joint Discussion w/EDC D/R D/R Final Review Draft Alternatives D/R Housing Policy Discussion D/R Transportation D/R D/R Land Use D/R D/R D/R Housing D/R D/R D/R Draft DEIS Impacts and Preliminary Mitigations D/R Waterfront Vision - Preliminary Concept D/R Draft EIS Comments Summary D/R FEIS/Preferred Plan Framework D/R Preferred Plan Recommendation D/R Code Updates Critical Aquifer Recharge D/R CAO Update (RCW 36.70A.130 - end 2025) Tree Code Update Detached Accessory Dwelling Units (HB 1337 - mid 2025) D/R D/R Green Building Incentives D/R PH D/R Climate Legislative Package I PH Land use permit timelines (SB 5290 - end 2024) R PH Middle Housing (HB 1110 - mid 2025) 1 D/R D/R PH D/R Design standards and processes (HB 1293 - mid 2025), including multfamily design standards I D/R PH D/R Long Range Capital Improvement Program/Capital Facilties Plan I PH Tree Canopy Policy D/R ++ Administrative Site specific rezone request PH Election of Officers D/R Planning & Development Annual Work Plan B Annual Retreat I Planning Board report to City Council D/R B Parks, Recreation & Human Services Reporti R B KEY I- Introduction & Discussion PH- Public Hearing D/R- Discussion/Recommendation B- Briefing/Q&A R- Report with no briefing/presentation Regular meeting cancelled Future Items Neighborhood Center/Hub Plans Code Modernization Projects: 1. Unified Development Code (late 2025 - 2026) Comp Plan Implementation Highway 99 Community Renewal Program September 11, 2024 is a special meeting at 6PM December 16, 2024 is a special meeting January 28, 2025 is a presentation to Council Q Packet Pg. 282