Loading...
REVIEWED Earth Solutions Geo Compliance ResposneSeptember 23, 2020 ES-5839.01 Paradise Heights, LLC 24144 East Greystone Lane Woodway, Washington 98020 Attention: Mr. John Rettenmier Subject: Response to Comments Proposed Multi -Family Residences Paradise Heights 546 Paradise Lane Edmonds, Washington RESUB Sep 28 2020 CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Earth Solutions NW«C Earth Solutions NW LLC Geotechnical Engineering, Construction Observation/Testing and Environmental Services Reference: Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) Geotechnical Engineering Study, dated March 5, 2018 Plan Review, dated November 15, 2019 Donna Breske & Associates, LLC Civil Plans, dated November 10, 2020 Drainage Report, dated November 13, 2018 Dear Mr. Rettenmier: As requested, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared this letter responding to the City of Edmonds review comments. The comments pertinent to the geotechnical aspects of the project are provided below, followed by our responses. ESNW prepared the referenced geotechnical documents for the subject project. Review Comment 3 — The plan review letter prepared by Earth Solutions, dated November 15, 2019, lists under reference documents, the civil plans dated 11/7/2019, prepared by Donna Breske. There was no mention of the drainage report with this memo. Please provide confirmation that the drainage report was also reviewed for compliance. ESNW Response — As part of this response to comments, ESNW reviewed the referenced drainage manual and found the geotechnical recommendations have been incorporated and comply with the report. 15365 N.E. 90th Street, Suite 100 • Redmond, WA 98052 • (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711 Paradise Heights, LLC September 23, 2020 ES-5839.01 Page 2 Review Comment SW2-6 — It appears that the architectural plans show at least some degree of footing/foundation/stem walls with subsurface elements and the Geotech recommended footing drains such foundation types. Either: (a) Provide footing drains and appropriate discharge locations, or; (b) Explain in written response how the proposal meets the geotechnical recommendations to provide footing drains, or; (c) Provide geotechnical approval of the plans as proposed. ESNW Response — As documented in the referenced geotechnical engineering study, relatively clean coarse sand was predominant during the subsurface exploration. Because the native soils are relatively well -draining, it is our opinion the elimination of footing drains is acceptable from a geotechnical standpoint, provided footing excavation conditions are confirmed by ESNW during construction. Should you require additional information, or have questions, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC U) 53803 LtG ST L NA 09/23/2020 Henry T. Wright, P.E. Senior Project Manager cc: Michel Design Attention: Mr. Rob Michel (Email only) Earth Solutions NW. LLC