HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-10-24 Architectural Design Board PacketAgenda
Edmonds Architectural Design Board
REGULAR MEETING
BRACKETT ROOM
121 5TH AVE N, CITY HALL - 3RD FLOOR, EDMONDS, WA 98020
OCTOBER 24, 2024, 6:00 PM
Edmonds Architectural Design Board Agenda
October 24, 2024
Page 1
REGULAR MEETING INFORMATION
This is a Hybrid meeting. Attendees may appear in person or on-line via the zoom link provided.
Physical Meeting Location: Brackett Room, 3rd Floor Edmonds City Hall 121 5th Avenue N.
Zoom Link: https://edmondswa-
gov.zoom.us/j/88959586932?pwd=RzdPWUlwM09PZ1k1MHN2eWM1YXphZz09 Passcode: 591531
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
3. AUDIENCE COMMENTS
Statement: This is an opportunity to comment regarding any matter not listed on the agenda as
public hearing. Speakers are limited to five minutes. Please clearly state your name and city of
residence.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Previous Meeting Minutes
5. NEW BUSINESS
A. BLD2024-0979 Edmonds Swedish Signage Design Review
B. Streamline Design Review and Middle Housing
6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Draft Comprehensive Plan Element Review
7. BOARD REVIEW ITEMS
Items requiring review and recommendation from the ADB.
8. BOARD DISCUSSION ITEMS
9. ADB MEMBER COMMENTS
10. ADJOURNMENT
Architectural Design Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/24/2024
Previous Meeting Minutes
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning & Development
Prepared By: Michelle Martin
Background/History
N/A
Staff Recommendation
Review and approve minutes from September 26th meeting.
Narrative
Draft meeting minutes from September 26th attached.
Attachments:
ADB 09262024_draft
Packet Pg. 2
Architectural Design Board Meeting
Minutes of Regular Meeting
September 26, 2024
Page 1 of 3
DRAFT
CITY OF EDMONDS
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
Minutes of Regular Meeting
September 26, 2024
Chair Bayer called the hybrid meeting of the Architectural Design Board to order at 6:00 p.m. in the Brackett
Room at Edmonds City Hall, 121 – 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington.
Board Members Present
Kim Bayer, Chair (online)
Alexa Brooks, Vice Chair
Maurine Jeude (online)
Corbitt Loch (online)
Todd Stine
Board Members Absent
Alex Hutchinson
Steve Schmitz
Staff Present
Mike Clugston, Acting Planning Manager
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
AUDIENCE COMMENTS
None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
August 22, 2024 ADB Meeting Minutes
MOTION MADE BY VICE CHAIR BROOKS, SECONDED BY BOARD MEMBER STINE, TO
APPROVE THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
NEW BUSINESS
None
BOARD REVIEW ITEMS
None
a
Packet Pg. 3
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
D
B
0
9
2
6
2
0
2
4
_
d
r
a
f
t
(
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Architectural Design Board Meeting
Minutes of Regular Meeting
September 26, 2024
Page 2 of 3
BOARD DISCUSSION ITEMS
Planning Manager Clugston reviewed the status of the ADB, the Comprehensive Plan update, legislative
requirements, and the staffing situation. He explained that Interim Planning Director Shane Hope was looking
forward to attending the meeting tonight but perhaps had gotten the time mixed up. Chair Bayer praised the
changes she has noticed since Interim Planning Director Shane Hope has been on board and commented she
was also very pleased that Planning Manager Clugston was back to help guide them. She acknowledged the
time crunch with the Comprehensive Plan update and shortage of resources. She expressed appreciation to the
members of the ADB for the value they bring to the City.
Chair Bayer asked about any projects the Board might be reviewing by the end of the year. Planning Manager
Clugston explained there would be two coming up in October and one or two at a special meeting on December
9. Chair Bayer asked what happened to all the work the ADB did on multifamily design standards and design
work related to the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Manager Clugston explained that some of it could be
reintroduced in the future; they will try to incorporate as much as possible. The work plan is up in the air right
now. Because of lack of staff, things are on hold other than a few design review projects, the Comprehensive
Plan update, and working toward compliance with HB 1293 by end of June 2025.
There was some discussion about the ADB’s role going forward, potential changes with processes, and whether
their work should be focused more on permits or policies. Board Member Loch commented that they need to
concentrate on design guidelines, procedures for making sure that those are attended to, and a way for people
to propose other ideas. They also need to answer the question of who does the review once they have very clear
policies and regulations.
Board Member Jeude expressed concern about just having one meeting and no opportunity to require a better
design. Once the designs get to the ADB, she felt it would be too late in the process. She spoke to the need to
have very clear and precise design guidelines. She wondered how precise they can get without overwhelming
a project. Planning Manager Clugston concurred and stated he is still hoping for some guidance from the
Department of Commerce. He agreed that having an outside opportunity for Board review could be really
useful.
Board Member Stine agreed with the concern that no matter how well they write the design guidelines, they are
open for interpretation. He stated that design is an iterative process and just having one hearing will not likely
produce what they want for the city. There was general agreement with this.
Chair Bayer asked about the possibility of having the ADB get involved earlier in the process. Planning Manager
Clugston was not sure about that since they are only allowed to hold one public meeting. If they meet earlier in
the process, they would not be able to have another review later on. Vice Chair Brooks noted that if they have
a well written Comprehensive Plan, there wouldn’t be a need for an early review. Planning Manager Clugston
suggested possibly taking the design information out of the Comprehensive Plan and putting it into a design
manual. He thought that the design manual could be more subjective whereas the code has to be clear and
objective. He will try to get more clarity on if this would be acceptable.
Chair Bayer asked if there would be any opportunities for the ADB to have input on anything in the
Comprehensive Plan that would have a design impact. Planning Manager Clugston thought they would be
a
Packet Pg. 4
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
D
B
0
9
2
6
2
0
2
4
_
d
r
a
f
t
(
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Architectural Design Board Meeting
Minutes of Regular Meeting
September 26, 2024
Page 3 of 3
basically adopting the existing Comprehensive Plan language in the new Comprehensive Plan because they
have to meet the deadline; however, they know they will need to update the language next year.
There was some discussion and support for holding a joint meeting with City Council, Planning Board, and
staff in January to learn what the City Council values. Planning Manager Clugston agreed and said they could
look into that. The group talked about having a discussion at the December meeting about what they would like
to cover.
Chair Bayer asked for clarification about how project review is determined and why the ADB reviews some
projects and not others. Planning Manager Clugston explained that projects that require a SEPA determination
come to the Board for review.
Chair Bayer wondered if staff had heard anything from the Council about having the ADB involved with
DADUs. Planning Manager Clugston said he had not, but he noted there had been interest in the past about
having some sort of pre-approved plans for DADUs. That is something that the ADB could review if it moves
forward; this is something they could talk about at the meeting in January. Planning Manager Clugston
responded to questions regarding the consultants for the Comprehensive Plan and the status of the Baskin
Robbins site the ADB had reviewed.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS
Chair Bayer noted she would follow up with Board Members Hutchinson and Schmitz.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
a
Packet Pg. 5
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
A
D
B
0
9
2
6
2
0
2
4
_
d
r
a
f
t
(
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
M
i
n
u
t
e
s
)
Architectural Design Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/24/2024
BLD2024-0979 Swedish Medical Center Langer Building Sign Package Design Review
Staff Lead: Tristan Sewell
Department: Planning & Development
Prepared By: Tristan Sewell
Background/History
On August 9, 2024, the City received an application for new signs at the Edmonds Swedish Medical
Center's Langer Building at 21600 Highway 99. After subsequent staff review and feedback, the
applicant requested on October 8, 2024, that the Architectural Design Board review the proposed
modifications to the requirements of Chapter 20.60 ECDC as allowed in ECDC 20.60.015(B).
Staff Recommendation
Due to the needs of the onsite urgent care clinic and adjacent emergency room, visitor navigation of
these lots as one contiguous space, the frontage on two streets, and the proposed signage's
compatibility with the development in the vicinity, staff recommends the Architectural Design Board
approve the applicant's proposed signage.
Narrative
The applicant requested the Architectural Design Board review the modifications to the sign code
incorporated into the proposed signage because of the present difficulty patients face locating the
urgent care clinic onsite.
Attachments:
BLD2024-0979 Staff Report
BLD2024-0979 Staff Report Attachments
Packet Pg. 6
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
Phone: 425.771.0220 • Fax: 425.771.0221 • Web: www.edmondswa.gov
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • PLANNING DIVISION
Page 1 of 2
DESIGN REVIEW
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN BOARD
Project: Swedish Medical Center Langer Building Sign Package
File Number: BLD2024-0979
Date of Report: October 18, 2024
From: Tristan Sewell, Planner
Proposal: Modification to the sign design standards of Chapter 20.60 ECDC.
I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION:
Construct or update signage for the Langer Building at the Edmonds Swedish Medical Center.
The site contains an urgent care clinic and other medical services and is adjacent to the
emergency room.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Owner: Public Hospital District 2 Snohomish County
2. Applicant: Jorden Weiner, Division 10 Signs
3. Tax Parcel Number(s): 00580700002900
4. Location: 21600 Highway 99
5. Zoning: General Commercial (CG)
6. Existing Use: Medical & Other Health Services
7. Review Process: ECDC 20.60.015(B)(1) enables eligible applicants to request
modification to any of the standards of Chapter 20.60 ECDC, subject to review by the
Architectural Design Board using the criteria of ECDC 20.60.015(B)(2).
a
Packet Pg. 7
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
File No. BLD2024-0979
Request for ADB Approval of Modifications
Swedish Medical Center Langer Building Sign Package
Page 2 of 3
II. TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE:
The City of Edmonds’ Planning & Development department and Public Works
Engineering division staff reviewed and evaluated this application. Building and
Engineering each approved the attached plans already.
III. APPLICABLE CODES:
ECDC 20.60 – Sign Code
Section 025 – Total maximum permanent sign area
Maximum total area: 200 sq. ft.
Maximum total number: five
Staff Analysis: The applicant proposes a total number of four signs. The total proposed
sign area totals 110.2 square feet. The proposed signage complies with this section.
Section 045 – Freestanding signs – Regulation
Maximum Area: 160 sq. ft.
Location: As near to the center of the street frontage as possible.
Number: One at the corner or one on each frontage on arterial streets
Landscaping: A landscaped area twice the area of each sign at each’s base
Staff Analysis: The applicant aims to clarify patient navigation onsite to the urgent care
facility. Although Subsection A discourages freestanding signs, staff finds no reasonable
and feasible alternative to address the applicant’s need for legible navigation to crucial
medical facilities onsite. The proposed freestanding signage exceeds the maximum
number permitted on corner lots, with both one at the corner and one on each street face.
The total freestanding sign area totals 86.2 square feet. The proposal positions the signs
on each street frontage reasonably close to the center of the property line, with the
concern for legible navigation to the urgent care and emergency room in mind. The
locations proposed are already landscaped, though compliance with Chapter 20.13 was
not reviewed here. As proposed, the signage does not comply with this section; the
applicant seeks Architectural Design Board’s modification to this section’s requirements,
specifically the number and location of signs.
Section 030 – Wall signs – Maximum area and height
Maximum area: One square foot per lineal foot of attached wall
Maximum height: 14 feet or height of the building face
Staff Analysis: The proposed building identification wall sign complies with Section
030.
ECDC 20.60.015(B)(2) – Design review procedures – Review Criteria
a) Compatibility of the materials, colors, design, and proportions of the proposed
signage with development onsite and similar signage in the vicinity
b) Modification shall not exceed the maximum normally allowed by more than 50%
a
Packet Pg. 8
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
File No. BLD2024-0979
Request for ADB Approval of Modifications
Swedish Medical Center Langer Building Sign Package
Page 3 of 3
Staff Analysis: Within the Edmonds Swedish Medical Center’s campus and larger
Medical/Highway 99 Activity Center context, the proposed signage abides by the color
and design schemes used onsite and would not be out of character. Increasing the number
of freestanding signs from two (one on each street face) to three (each street face and the
corner) abides by the maximum increase of 50%. The proposed sign area (both
cumulative and for each sign type) complies with the normally permissible maximum.
IV. CONCLUSION:
Based on the above analysis of the project proposal, staff finds the proposal satisfies the
criteria for modification of sign code requirements by the Architectural Design Board
listed in ECDC 20.60.015(B)(2).
V. RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the analysis of applicable codes, conclusions, and attachments to this report,
staff recommends that the Architectural Design Board APPROVE the proposed
modifications. Staff identified no necessary conditions to this approval at this time.
VI. ATTACHMENTS:
1. Applicant Cover Letter
2. Signage Plan Set
3. Site Plan
a
Packet Pg. 9
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
ADB Cover Letter
www.Division10Sign.com 1 of 1
www.Division10Sign.com
Initials:
10/11/24
City of Edmonds Planning and Development Services
121 5th Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
RE: Langer Building Signage
BLD2024-0979
Location: 21600 Highway 99, Edmonds, WA 98026
We kindly request that the design review of this sign permit be referred to the Architectural Design Board in time
for their meeting on Thursday, October 24th.
This sign permit is being submitted on behalf of the Verdant Health Commission for a medical building renovation
project that houses an Urgent Care facility at the corner of Highway 99 and 216th St. SW. Verdant is trying to remedy
a chronic problem faced by its patrons who, during a medical emergency, are having a very difficult time identifying
and locating the urgent care facility within this property.
The sign code 20.60.045 (E) and 20.60.045 (F) allows either one sign at the corner of two public streets or one sign
for each frontage. We are requesting that the Architectural Design Board modify this requirement to allow for three
free-standing signs at this property. Verdant, myself, and their design team, JPC Architects, has determined that a
sign at the corner of Highway 99 and 216th St. SW, as well as at each driveway entrance on Highway 99 and 216th St.
SW, is critical for directing patrons in to the facility. Since most visitors will be directed to the corner of Highway 99
and 216th St. SW, having a sign here is our first opportunity to grab their attention and give them confirmation they
are near their destination. Having a sign at the driveway entrance on 216th St. SW is equally important because the
Swedish Medical Facility is located further down 216th St. SW and it is imperative we have a sign that directs people
off of 216th St. SW in to our parking lot.
The sign code 20.60.015 (B-1a) allows the board to consider our request due to the unique configuration of the
property, and sign code 20.60.015 (B-2b) would allow the board to increase the allowable sign quantity by 50% from
2 to 3. In the interest of public safety, we strongly encourage you to approve this modification.
Sincerely,
Jorden Weiner | President
DIVISION 10 SIGNS
19410 Hwy 99, Ste A – 225 | Lynnwood, WA 98036
c 425.563.9599 | f 425.740.0184 | e Jordenw@Division10sign.com
b
Packet Pg. 10
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
E7.1-1 | E7.1-2 E7.2-1 | E7.2-2
Drawing Index
Jorden Weiner
c 425.563.9599 | f 425.740.0184
e Jordenw@Division10Sign.com
PROJECT ADDRESS
Langer Medical Building
21600 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
CLIENT
Verdant Health Commission
4710 196th St. SW
Lynnwood, WA 98036
Ania McCleary | 425.894.2238
ARCHITECT / DESIGNER
JPC Architects
909 112th Ave NE, Ste 206
Bellevue, WA 98004
Christine Benda | 425.641.9200
contact
project information
SIGNAGE IS TO BE PRODUCED FROM THESE
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CLIENT SHALL VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS, SPELLING, MATERIALS, AND
ACCURACY. PRODUCTION WILL BEGIN ONCE THE
FINAL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS ARE RECEIVED BY
DIVISION 10 SIGNS.
COLORS SHOWN ARE FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES
ONLY. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR CHARTS, SAMPLES,
AND MOCK-UPS FOR TRUE COLOR MATCHES.
disclosures
revisions
Cover Page Langer Medical Building
1. Issued | 6.29.24
2. Submittal 02 Review Comments | 7.12.24
3. Re-issued | 7.29.24
4. Submittal 02.1 Review Comments | 8.1.24
5. Submittal 02.1 Meeting Notes | 8.27.24
6. Re-issued | 8.30.24
Customer Signature:Date of Customer Review:
E6-1E5-1
b
Packet Pg. 11
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
AVENIR MEDIUM (Default font unless noted otherwise) abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ1234567890
AVENIR ROMAN
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1234567890
AVENIR HEAVY
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
1234567890
Fonts
Jorden Weiner
c 425.563.9599 | f 425.740.0184
e Jordenw@Division10Sign.com
PROJECT ADDRESS
Langer Medical Building
21600 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
CLIENT
Verdant Health Commission
4710 196th St. SW
Lynnwood, WA 98036
Ania McCleary | 425.894.2238
ARCHITECT / DESIGNER
JPC Architects
909 112th Ave NE, Ste 206
Bellevue, WA 98004
Christine Benda | 425.641.9200
contact
project information
SIGNAGE IS TO BE PRODUCED FROM THESE
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CLIENT SHALL VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS, SPELLING, MATERIALS, AND
ACCURACY. PRODUCTION WILL BEGIN ONCE THE
FINAL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS ARE RECEIVED BY
DIVISION 10 SIGNS.
COLORS SHOWN ARE FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES
ONLY. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR CHARTS, SAMPLES,
AND MOCK-UPS FOR TRUE COLOR MATCHES.
disclosures
Typography & Finishes Langer Medical Building
General Notes
1. Review shop drawings carefully for missing information and
provide a detailed response.
2. All finishes shall be low-sheen unless noted otherwise.
MP 18100 Silver Star Metallic
P-1| Centria 9989 Platinum
Rowmark 204 Bright White
M-1| Bright White
Rowmark 201 White
M-2| White
Rowmark 401 Black
M-3| Black
MP 00547 Mudstone
P-3 | Centria 9921 Charcoal Gray
PMS 485C
P-4 | Red
Centria 850 Light Oak
M-4 | Centria 850 Light Oak
3M 7125 Controltac Matte Black
V-1 | Black
3M 7125 Controltac Matte White
V-2 | White
Engineer Grade Reflective
V-4 | White
Standard White
P-12 | White
PMS 152C
P-6| Urgent Orange
Pantone 7406C
P-10 | Yellow
Standard Black / SW 6258 Tricorn Black
P-11 | Black
PMS 3506C / CMYK 92, 59, 0, 0
P-5| Blue
PMS 7698C
P-7 | Blue Green
PMS 5545C
P-9| Green
PMS 3506C / CMYK 92, 59, 0, 0
P-8| Dark Red
MP 18170 TI Grey Metallic
P-2| Centria 9960 XL Medium Gray
3M 7125 Scotchcal PMS 186C
V-3 | Perfect Match Red
Plastics & Metals Paint Finishes Vinyl
Brushed aluminum with satin clear coat
M-5 | Brushed Aluminum
b
Packet Pg. 12
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
Sign Type E5Quantity | 1 Sheet E5-1
Jorden Weiner
c 425.563.9599 | f 425.740.0184
e Jordenw@Division10Sign.com
PROJECT ADDRESS
Langer Medical Building
21600 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
1 Submittal 02 Review Comments | 7.12.24
2
3
4
5
contact
project information
revisions
fabrication notes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SIGNAGE IS TO BE PRODUCED FROM THESE
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CLIENT SHALL VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS, SPELLING, MATERIALS, AND
ACCURACY. PRODUCTION WILL BEGIN ONCE THE
FINAL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS ARE RECEIVED BY
DIVISION 10 SIGNS.
COLORS SHOWN ARE FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES
ONLY. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR CHARTS, SAMPLES,
AND MOCK-UPS FOR TRUE COLOR MATCHES.
disclosures
WA
L
L
CONDUIT TO HOUSE
PRIMARY POWER
POWER SUPPLY
TO PRIMARY
POWER
RACEWAY
MOUNTING CLIPS
FASTENED WITH
NON-CORROSIVE
FASTERNERS.
DETERMINED BY
WALL CONDITIONS
3.5"
2.5” D TRIMLESS FACE-LIT CH. LTRS. ON A RACEWAY
3MM ACM BACKS, P-2
LED COLOR: WHITE
1/4” EASY CLIP
STRUCTURAL ADHESIVE
NON-CORROSIVE SCREWS
PAINTED TO MATCH RETURNS
LETTERFORM ALUM
RETURNS W/ PVC LEDGES
FOR FACE & BASE
COLOR: P-2
1/4” ACRYLIC FACE
COLOR: WHITE
2.5"
NIGHT VIEW
N.T.S.
DETAIL VIEW
SCALE: 1/2” = 1’
PROVIDED RENDERING N.T.S.
16"
(1'-4")
216.362"
(18'-0 3/8")
216.375” RACEWAY, P-3 C-2 DIGITAL PRINT ON PERF W/ GLOSS LAM
(TO LIGHT WHITE AT NIGHT)
b
Packet Pg. 13
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
Sign Type E6Quantity | 1 Location Sheet E6-1
Jorden Weiner
c 425.563.9599 | f 425.740.0184
e Jordenw@Division10Sign.com
PROJECT ADDRESS
Langer Medical Building
21600 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
1
2
3
4
5
contact
project information
revisions
fabrication notes
Enlarged Elevation View
Scale: 1” = 1’-0”1 Side Elevation View
Scale: 1” = 1’-0”2
Existing Sign
Not to Scale3
SIGNAGE IS TO BE PRODUCED FROM THESE
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CLIENT SHALL VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS, SPELLING, MATERIALS, AND
ACCURACY. PRODUCTION WILL BEGIN ONCE THE
FINAL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS ARE RECEIVED BY
DIVISION 10 SIGNS.
COLORS SHOWN ARE FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES
ONLY. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR CHARTS, SAMPLES,
AND MOCK-UPS FOR TRUE COLOR MATCHES.
disclosures
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
8
9
Push-through clear acrylic lettering with
perforated black vinyl
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-2, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-3, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-1, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-4, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-6, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Remove peeling/chipping paint and refinish
with Sherwin Williams Pro-Industrial DTM Paint, P-11
NOTE: Please provide us with a PMS color match
for the Swedish blue logo.
Avenir Heavy font
8"
31
.
5
"
8"
12
.
5
"
60
"
4"
2"2"60.25"
120.5"
8.
9
2
2
"
18
"
4"
12"b
Packet Pg. 14
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
Sign Type E7.1Quantity | 1 Location Sheet E7.1-1
Jorden Weiner
c 425.563.9599 | f 425.740.0184
e Jordenw@Division10Sign.com
PROJECT ADDRESS
Langer Medical Building
21600 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
1 Submittal 02 Review Comments | 7.12.24
2 Submittal 02.1 Review Comments | 8.1.24
3 Submittal 02.1 Meeting Notes | 8.27.244
4
5
contact
project information
revisions
fabrication notes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Internally illuminated sign cabinet, P-1
Push-through clear acrylic lettering with
perforated black vinyl
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-2, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-4, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-6, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Enlarged Elevation View - Side A
Scale: 1” = 1’-0”1 Enlarged Elevation View - Side B
Scale: 1” = 1’-0”2 Enlarged Side Elevation View
Scale: 1” = 1’-0”3
SIGNAGE IS TO BE PRODUCED FROM THESE
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CLIENT SHALL VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS, SPELLING, MATERIALS, AND
ACCURACY. PRODUCTION WILL BEGIN ONCE THE
FINAL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS ARE RECEIVED BY
DIVISION 10 SIGNS.
COLORS SHOWN ARE FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES
ONLY. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR CHARTS, SAMPLES,
AND MOCK-UPS FOR TRUE COLOR MATCHES.
disclosures
Avenir Heavy font
2
3
3
3
4
5
6
6
6
6
6
Finished
Grade
126
20” deep concrete footing per structural engineer’s design.20” deep concrete footing per structural engineer’s design.
20” deep concrete footingper structural engineer’s design.
Electrical rough-in to be coordinated
with Axiom Contractors.
60.000"24.000"
6"
5"
3"
1"
1"
16
"
36
"
6"48"
2"2"
54"
(Center building name horizontally)
8"
6"
3.
2
5
"
3.
5
"
2.
5
"
52
.
0
0
0
"
b
Packet Pg. 15
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
Sign Type E7.1Quantity | 1 Location Sheet E7.1-2
Jorden Weiner
c 425.563.9599 | f 425.740.0184
e Jordenw@Division10Sign.com
PROJECT ADDRESS
Langer Medical Building
21600 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
1 Submittal 02 Review Comments | 7.12.24
2 Submittal 02.1 Review Comments | 8.1.24
3 Submittal 02.1 Meeting Notes | 8.27.244
4
5
contact
project information
revisions
fabrication notes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Internally illuminated sign cabinet, P-1
Push-through clear acrylic lettering with
perforated black vinyl
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-2, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-4, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-6, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mounting Elevation View - Side A
Not to Scale1 Mounting Elevation View - Side B
Not to Scale2
SIGNAGE IS TO BE PRODUCED FROM THESE
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CLIENT SHALL VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS, SPELLING, MATERIALS, AND
ACCURACY. PRODUCTION WILL BEGIN ONCE THE
FINAL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS ARE RECEIVED BY
DIVISION 10 SIGNS.
COLORS SHOWN ARE FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES
ONLY. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR CHARTS, SAMPLES,
AND MOCK-UPS FOR TRUE COLOR MATCHES.
disclosures
Division 10 Signs to remove
existing signs
Avenir Heavy font
Axiom Construction to provide gravel backfill under sign cabinet and over entirety of concrete footing.
60" Min.
18’
60” Min.
EQ
EQ
b
Packet Pg. 16
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
Sign Type E7.2Quantity | 1 Location Sheet E7.2-1
Jorden Weiner
c 425.563.9599 | f 425.740.0184
e Jordenw@Division10Sign.com
PROJECT ADDRESS
Langer Medical Building
21600 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
1 Submittal 02 Review Comments | 7.12.24
2 Submittal 02.1 Review Comments | 8.1.24
3 Submittal 02.1 Meeting Notes | 8.27.244
4
5
contact
project information
revisions
fabrication notes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Internally illuminated sign cabinet, P-1
Push-through clear acrylic lettering with
perforated black vinyl
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-2, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-4, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-6, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Enlarged Elevation View - Side B
Scale: 1” = 1’-0”1 Enlarged Elevation View - Side A
Scale: 1” = 1’-0”2 Enlarged Side Elevation View
Scale: 1” = 1’-0”3
SIGNAGE IS TO BE PRODUCED FROM THESE
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CLIENT SHALL VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS, SPELLING, MATERIALS, AND
ACCURACY. PRODUCTION WILL BEGIN ONCE THE
FINAL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS ARE RECEIVED BY
DIVISION 10 SIGNS.
COLORS SHOWN ARE FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES
ONLY. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR CHARTS, SAMPLES,
AND MOCK-UPS FOR TRUE COLOR MATCHES.
disclosures
Avenir Heavy font
2
3
3
5
6
6
6
Finished
Grade
126
3
4 6
6
20” deep concrete footing per structural engineer’s design.20” deep concrete footing per structural engineer’s design.
20” deep concrete footingper structural engineer’s design.
Electrical rough-in to be coordinated
with Axiom Contractors.
60.000"24.000"
6"
5"
3"
1"
1"
16
"
36
"
6"48"
2"2"
54"
(Center building name horizontally)
8"
6"
3.
2
5
"
3.
5
"
2.
5
"
52
.
0
0
0
"
b
Packet Pg. 17
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
Sign Type E7.2Quantity | 1 Location Sheet E7.2-2
Jorden Weiner
c 425.563.9599 | f 425.740.0184
e Jordenw@Division10Sign.com
PROJECT ADDRESS
Langer Medical Building
21600 Highway 99
Edmonds, WA 98026
1 Submittal 02 Review Comments | 7.12.24
2 Submittal 02.1 Review Comments | 8.1.24
3 Submittal 02.1 Meeting Notes | 8.27.244
4
5
contact
project information
revisions
fabrication notes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Internally illuminated sign cabinet, P-1
Push-through clear acrylic lettering with
perforated black vinyl
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-2, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-4, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mechanically fastened face panel, P-6, lettering
backed with white translucent polycarbonate
Mounting Elevation View - Side A
Not to Scale1 Mounting Elevation View - Side B
Not to Scale2
SIGNAGE IS TO BE PRODUCED FROM THESE
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CLIENT SHALL VERIFY
ALL DIMENSIONS, SPELLING, MATERIALS, AND
ACCURACY. PRODUCTION WILL BEGIN ONCE THE
FINAL APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS ARE RECEIVED BY
DIVISION 10 SIGNS.
COLORS SHOWN ARE FOR PRESENTATION PURPOSES
ONLY. PLEASE REFER TO COLOR CHARTS, SAMPLES,
AND MOCK-UPS FOR TRUE COLOR MATCHES.
disclosures
Division 10 Signs to remove
existing sign
Avenir Heavy font
Axiom Construction to provide gravel backfill under sign cabinet and over entirety of concrete footing.
60" Min.
15’15’
Landscaped Area
60" Minimum
from sidewalk
b
Packet Pg. 18
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
Sign Type E6
Sign Type E5
Sign Type E7.2
Sign Type E7.1
b
Packet Pg. 19
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
s
(
B
L
D
2
0
2
4
-
0
9
7
9
E
d
m
o
n
d
s
S
w
e
d
i
s
h
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
Architectural Design Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/24/2024
Streamline Design Review and Middle Housing
Staff Lead: Brad Shipley
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Brad Shipley
Background/History
HB 1293 required local governments that utilize a design review process to streamline their process by
only requiring design guidelines that can be considered “clear and objective.”
Additionally, HB 1110 requires local governments to allow middle housing options on all residentially
zoned lots that do not already allow densities greater than what can be achieved through middle
housing.
Fully-planning cities must effectuate the requirements beginning six months after the periodic
comprehensive plan update, being July 1, 2025.
Over the course of the last year, the ADB has had much discussion about what this means for Edmonds
and the design review process. This agenda item is a continuation of those discussions and an effort to
advance the conversation.
Staff Recommendation
N/A
Narrative
Planning will present a more in-depth look at HB 1293 and provide some examples of what “clear and
objective” design standards look like and don’t look like, as well as provide concepts of design review
processes to consider.
The presentation will also look at middle housing and a potential approach to updating our development
code.
Packet Pg. 20
Architectural Design Board Agenda Item
Meeting Date: 10/24/2024
Draft Comprehensive Plan Element Review
Staff Lead: Mike Clugston
Department: Planning Division
Prepared By: Michael Clugston
Background/History
Under the Growth Management Act (GMA) in Washington State, cities are required to update their
Comprehensive Plans. These plans serve as the foundation of local planning efforts, outlining a
community's vision over a 20-year period through goals, policies, and actions that guide the decisions of
elected officials and local government staff.
The GMA mandates that Comprehensive Plans include certain essential elements, while also allowing
cities and counties to incorporate additional optional elements. Housing and land use are critical
mandatory elements as they direct future community growth. In addition to housing and land use, the
2020 Comprehensive Plan includes several other important elements: Community Sustainability,
Economic Development, Community Culture and Urban Design, Utilities, Capital Facilities, and
Transportation.
The City released the draft 2024 Comprehensive Plan on October 3, 2024. The draft Culture, History,
and Urban Design element is attached for the Board's review.
Staff Recommendation
Staff will provide a brief overview of the draft element. Following discussion, the Board should make a
recommendation on the draft language in the proposed element. Any proposed edits can be provided to
staff after the meeting.
Narrative
Edmonds stands out for its historic character and natural beauty, which distinguishes it from its
neighboring cities. As redevelopment occurs, it is crucial to maintain the city's unique identity while
addressing the specific challenges and priorities raised by residents.
An optional but significant element in the Comprehensive Plan is the Community Culture and Urban
Design. Edmonds has a vibrant arts community supported by various local organizations. The community
values its cultural heritage, environmental beauty, and recreational opportunities. As such, this element
is proposed to be renamed to Culture, History, and Urban Design, emphasizing the integration of these
aspects to create vibrant public spaces that resonate with residents and attract visitors. This section
encourages the use of public spaces for cultural activities, includes a historic preservation focus, and
promotes urban design that enhances both aesthetics and functionality.
There is one proposed Urban Design goal (CD-5), which states: “Achieve well-planned areas and public
spaces within the city.” Several policies to achieve the goal are proposed, including Policy CD-5.3 which
Packet Pg. 21
states:
“Until specific design standards are adopted by code for the downtown and waterfront area, the
following sections from the Culture and Urban Design Element of the Edmonds 2020 Comprehensive
Plan shall continue to serve as design guidelines for the development of buildings and sites: the Urban
Design Goals and Policies section, the General Design Objectives section, and the Urban Design Goals
and Policies for Specific Areas.”
It is anticipated that work on updating the design guidelines that are being carried over from the 2020
Plan will continue in 2025.
Attachments:
Draft 2024 Culture History Urban Design Element
2020 Community Culture and Urban Design Element
Packet Pg. 22
EVERYONE’S EDMONDS: CULTURE, HISTORY AND URBAN DESIGN 109
CULTURE, HISflCULTURE, HISfl
CULTURE,CULTURE,
HISTORY &HISTORY &
URBAN DESIGNURBAN DESIGN
Guiding Principle:Guiding Principle:
“Community quality of life in Edmonds is enhanced
by weaving culture, arts, historic preservation, and
thoughtful urban design into community activities and
placemaking”
a
Packet Pg. 23
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
110 CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | DRAFT OCTOBER 2024
a
Packet Pg. 24
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
EVERYONE’S EDMONDS: CULTURE, HISTORY AND URBAN DESIGN 111
Introduction
The purpose of the culture, history and urban design element is to ensure that the city’s growth and
development reflect its unique cultural identity while enhancing the quality of the built environment.
This element emphasizes the importance of preserving historical landmarks, promoting local arts and
traditions, and designing spaces that celebrate the community’s heritage. It also guides the aesthetic
and functional aspects of urban spaces, ensuring they are both visually appealing and culturally
significant, fostering a strong sense of place.
The integration of culture, history, and design elements is essential in shaping vibrant and meaningful
spaces that resonate with communities and attract visitors. Culture reflects the values, traditions, and
identity of a place, while history provides context and continuity, connecting the past with the present.
Thoughtful design, informed by these aspects, not only enhances the aesthetic and functional quality
of a space but also fosters a sense of belonging and pride among residents.
a
Packet Pg. 25
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
112 CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | DRAFT OCTOBER 2024
Arts and Culture
To expand public experience throughout the
broad spectrum of the arts, the city has planned
for and invested in arts and culture, including
through the establishment of the Edmonds Arts
Commission in 1975. The Community Cultural
Plan (CCP), developed by the Edmonda Arts
Commission and last updated in 2014, has
been adopted by reference as a part of the
Comprehensive Plan. This provides the vision,
goals, and implementation strategies for the
cultural development of the community. The
plan seeks to integrate artistic and cultural
experiences into everyday life, work, and visits in
Edmonds.
As an implementation strategy of the CCP,
Edmonds downtown became Washington’s first
Certified Creative District in 2018. An economic
impact study shows Edmonds’ arts and culture
sector consists of over 100 arts and culture-
related entities, organizations and businesses
with an estimated revenue of $19.6 million in
revenue to the local economy, 440 full-time
jobs and $17 million in labor income (2017). The
Edmonds Arts Festival has been a draw for 60
years, the Edmonds Center for the Arts opened
10 years ago and brings about 90,000 people
through its doors a year.
Edmonds Community Cultural Plan 2014
Goal 1. Reflect Edmonds’ commitment to arts
and culture through integration of the arts
in the city’s physical infrastructure, event
planning, image, and brand.
Goal 2. Embrace an expansive view of
art and culture to include and respond
to multiple forms of artistic and cultural
expression.
Goal 3. Foster creative community
partnerships to increase and secure
accessibility to the arts and cultural
experiences.
Goal 4. Maximize and diversify use of spaces
for arts and cultural activities in Edmonds.
Goal 5. Strengthen communication among
arts and cultural organizations and projects
to enhance scheduling, information sharing
and collaboration and to increase cultural
awareness in the community.
Edmonds’ Public Art program includes a permanent collection of sculpture, 2D works, temporary
installations, and special commissions. The collection includes over 65 outdoor installations
permanently sited downtown and in other locations throughout the city. Over 150 portable two- and
three-dimensional original works are located within several City buildings.
The Community Cultural Plan encourages the expanded use of public spaces as flexible and
accessible venues for a wide range of artistic and cultural activities.
a
Packet Pg. 26
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
EVERYONE’S EDMONDS: CULTURE, HISTORY AND URBAN DESIGN 113
Goal CD-1. Strengthen Edmonds’ creative
identity.
Policy CD-1.1 Recognize and encourage the City’s
role as a regional arts destination - with
participation from interested organizations
and stakeholders.
Policy CD-1.2 Support strategies from the
Community Cultural Plan to enrich
Edmonds’ physical environment, including
public spaces.
Goal CD-2. Leverage the creative arts
to foster dialogue with diverse
communities
Policy CD-2.1 Infuse art into existing city programs
and services. Partner with local artists
to create more accessible and inclusive
community engagement processes, such
as facilitating a community meeting,
exploring future scenarios, or storytelling.
Policy CD-2.2 Consider investing in the next
generation of Edmond’s artists, including
through programs for youth and young
adults.
Figure 6.1 “AOSAGI” installed in September 2021 by
Shogo Ota with Urban Artworks
Figure 6.2 “THE SALISH SEA” installed in November
2018 by Nick Goettling
Mural Project Edmonds’ (MPE’s) works:
Goal CD-3. Advance neighborhood pride through investments in the cultural arts
Policy CD-3.1 Encourage programs and pilot ideas about how to creatively use Edmond’s public places.
Policy CD-3.2 Encourage a diverse, year-round audience for Edmonds’ neighborhood and city-wide
events, such as festivals, installations, and exhibitions. Energize and activate neighborhood
public spaces with innovative performances and exhibits.
Policy CD-3.3 Identify, maintain, and develop cultural facilities, especially for areas of the city that lack
cultural spaces.
Policy CD-3.4 Seek to support public art projects such as neighborhood murals, art, bus shelters,
pocket parks and streetscapes.
a
Packet Pg. 27
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
114 CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | DRAFT OCTOBER 2024
Celebrating our Heritage
Certain geographic areas and sites within
Edmonds hold special significance due to their
archaeological, architectural, recreational,
social, cultural, and scenic importance. Historic
preservation aims to understand, acknowledge,
and conserve the cultural heritage of a
community.
The Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission
(HPC) maintains a register of historic places. HPC
promotes historic preservation in the community
and encourages owners of historically significant
properties to voluntarily add them to the Edmonds
Register of Historic Places. The HPC partners
with arts and historical organizations, such as
the Edmonds Arts Commission, and Edmonds
South Snohomish County Historical Society and
Museum, in pursuing its mission.
Edmonds’ Carnegie Library houses the Edmonds Historical Museum operated by the Edmonds–South
Snohomish County Historical Society. The museum offers text, oral and photographic archives of the
town’s early history. The museum’s 1910 building is on the National Register of Historic Places.
On a statewide level, the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation helps
identify and preserve cultural resources and historic properties. This includes using the Washington
Statewide Archaeological Predictive Model (WSAPM) by analyzing sites based on a selection of
environmental variables—such as slope aspect and percentage, elevation, distance to water, geology,
soils, and landforms—to help determine areas that may have a high probability of containing previously
unknown archaeological materials.
Goal CD-4. Continue to identify, celebrate, preserve, and maintain the cultural
resources and historic sites that reflect Edmonds’ heritage.
Policy CD-4.1 Support programs for the preservation of the city’s historic architectural, archeological,
and cultural resources through incentives, regulations, and informational activities.
Policy CD-4.2 Continue to maintain and expand the inventory of historic properties.
Policy CD-4.3 Collaborate with public agencies and the Edmonds Historic Preservation Commission to
determine priorities and incentives for identifying and preserving historic properties.
Figure 6.3 Honoring the land and the Coast Salish
tribes, ‘Marsh Life’ is an artistic depiction
and window into what life may have been
like for Coast Salish communities living
in the area. (Source: Edmonds Historical
Museum)
a
Packet Pg. 28
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
EVERYONE’S EDMONDS: CULTURE, HISTORY AND URBAN DESIGN 115
Urban Design
Urban design is a term that refers to the art and practice of designing buildings and the spaces around
them in a way that meets both aesthetic and functional objectives. Cities often employ urban design
concepts and standards to shape the built environment. In turn, the built environment, as it evolves, is
an important factor in a community’s qualify of life.
Use of Urban Design Standards
Edmonds practices design review of many types of development, with specific standards that apply
to types of use or designated areas of the city. The process for design review is carried out by the
Architectural Design Board and/or City staff, consistent with city regulations. Over the past decade,
Edmonds has used urban design guidelines and standards for development in designated Activity
Centers - namely, the Downtown/Waterfront Area and Highway 99 Subarea. Some of these urban
design standards have been included in sections of the municipal code and some in elements
of previous comprehensive plans. Having design standards in the Comprehensive Plan, which
is generally considered a broad policy document, rather than in the development regulations, is
confusing for development applicants, who normally rely on adopted regulations to set the rules for
design. It also makes review more time-consuming for City staff and the Architectural Design Board.
Updating City regulations to incorporate, add to, and/or update all design standards would be a more
effective approach.
In addition, recent state legislation has directed the need for changes to some aspects of local design
review processes, with the intent to enable more predictability and timeliness.
Place-making
Place-making is about creating attractive, comfortable spaces that reflect the identity, physical features
and objectives for a site or neighborhood. A place-making approach is particularly useful in designing
public places. The approach works best when it is based on understanding how people will use the
space and the barriers and opportunities that that will influence their choices.
Over the past decade, Edmonds has strategically planned for future development in Activity Centers.
Complementary to Activity Centers, the 2024 Comprehensive Plan identifies a Neighborhood Centers
and Hubs strategy to strengthen existing neighborhood mixed-use areas by accommodating growth
while providing for local needs and amenities. In designing public places for any particular site or use,
three critical human needs should be considered, namely: enjoyment comfort, and protection.
The figure 6.4 illustrates this concept, showing various factors related to the three critical human
needs.
a
Packet Pg. 29
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
116 CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | DRAFT OCTOBER 2024
ENJOYMENT COMFORT PROTECTION
Protection
against traffic and
accidents- feeling
safe
•Protection for pedestrians
•Eliminating fear of traffic
Scale
•Buildings and spaces
designed for human
scale
Opportunities to
see
•Reasonable viewing
distances
•Unhindered Views
•Lighting (when dark)
Opportunities to
talk/listen
•Low noise levels
•Street furniture that
provides ‘talkscapes’
Opportunities for
play and exercise
•Physical activity,
exercise
•Play and street
entertainment
Opportunities to
walk
•Room for walking
•Interesting facades
•No obstacles
•Accessibility for
everyone
Opportunities to
stand/stay
•Edge effect/attractive
zones for standing/
staying
•Supports for standing
Opportunities to
sit
•Zones for sitting
•Utilizing advantages:
view, Sun, people
•Good places to sit
Opportunities to
enjoy the positive
aspects of climate
•Sun/shade
•Shelter from wind/
breeze
Positive sensory
experience
•Good design and
detailing
•Good materials
•Fine views
•Trees, plants, water
Protection
against crime and
violence- feeling
secure
•Lively public realm
•Eyes on the street
•Overlapping functions
day and night
Protection against
unpleasant
sensory
experiences
•Wind, Rain/Snow
•Pollution
•Dust/Noise
Figure 6.4 12 urban quality criteria as developed by the Gehl Institute.
Goal CD-5. Achieve well-planned areas and public spaces within the city.
Policy CD-5.1 Create neighborhood-level plans for key centers and hubs to guide place-making and
public investments that reflect the needs and characteristics of the area.
Policy CD-5.2 Ensure that the City has appropriate design standards for development, especially
for multifamily housing and commercial development. The standards may reflect unique
characteristics and opportunities for a particular center or hub.
Policy CD-5.3 Until specific design standards are adopted by code for the downtown and waterfront
area, the following sections from the Culture and Urban Design Element of the Edmonds
2020 Comprehensive Plan shall continue to serve as design guidelines for the development
of buildings and sites: .the Urban Design Goals and Policies section, the General Design
Objectives section, and the Urban Design Goals and Policies for Specific Areas.
a
Packet Pg. 30
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
EVERYONE’S EDMONDS: CULTURE, HISTORY AND URBAN DESIGN 117
Policy CD-5.4 Consider place-making
opportunities for public spaces and rights-
of-way., as needs and resources allow.
The study should be carefully designed
to enable comparison between spaces
in the city and to other locations. It is
recommended to use the “Public Life Data
Protocol” (developed by Gehl Institute).
This data set should be used over time
to track, share, and compare information
about the relative success of the City’s
public spaces. Data should be collected
through:
•Observation
•On-site Surveys
•Focus Groups
•Qualitative ranking on urban quality criteria
Policy CD-5.5 Ensure that the Edmonds design
review process uses clear and objective
standards and processes that comply with
state law for timely and predictable design
review
Definition of art installation:
Temporary or permanent work of art
created specifically for a particular space
or environment. It often involves the
arrangement and placement of objects,
materials, or media in a way that transforms
the space and engages viewers in a unique
aesthetic or conceptual experience. Art
installations can vary widely in form and
medium, ranging from sculptures and
multimedia presentations to immersive
environments and interactive displays.
Potential Action Items
The following list outlines potential action items that can be further explored to guide implementation
efforts, considering the city’s priorities, available resources, and other critical factors. Any such action
that is selected will be designed to support the City’s long-term vision while ensuring compliance with
the Growth Management Act (GMA).
•Strategize distribution of restricted funds collected for the acquisition, installation and maintenance of
public art.
•Work with local schools and youth organizations to dedicate spaces for youth perspectives in
community-wide conversations.
•Support the maintenance of a strategic plan to guide the priorities and activities of the Historic
Preservation Commission.
•The city should invest in a set of “urban design frameworks” to be updated on an estimated 5-year
cycle for each identified Activity Center, Neighborhood Center and/or Hub
a
Packet Pg. 31
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
118 CITY OF EDMONDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | DRAFT OCTOBER 2024
•Urban design frameworks should follow a standardized method, such as the “12 urban quality
criteria” developed by the Gehl Institute and shown in Figure 6.4 to assess urban design
opportunities along with the utilization of the Gehl Public Life Data Protocol to inform public realm
investments. These criteria center around three critical human needs – protection, comfort, and
enjoyment. (Gehl, J. (1987). Life between Buildings. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.)
•The urban Design framework shall be developed with participation from relevant city departments
including Planning & Development, Public Works, Community, Culture & Economic Development and
Parks, Recreation and Human Services. The framework should be developed with Edmonds’ identity
as an arts destination as one of the key criteria for assessment.
•The Urban Design Frameworks shall include a “Public life study”. The public life study should include
data on items such as:
•The scale and urban characteristics of the space
•How many people are there, and for how long
•Who is there, by gender, age, etc.
•What activities are people engaging in
•Mapping of existing public spaces, transportation networks and community amenities including art
installations.
•Using data collected through public life studies, the city should create Public Life Action Plans
as a core component of each urban design framework to identify both design and programming
opportunities, gaps and areas for improvement. integrating artistic expression and cultural activities
to enrich the community’s distinct character and enhance quality of life.
•Update and develop policy to implement the goals as defined in the Community Cultural plan with a
focus on strategies of the ‘Creative Arts’ to enrich Edmonds’ physical environment, including public
spaces.
•Strategize distribution of restricted funds collected for the acquisition, installation ad maintenance of
public art under ‘Municipal arts fund’ and ‘Public art acquisition fund’.
•Based on Urban Design Framework and the completed Public Life Studies, identify areas with limited
access to cultural resources and opportunities for artistic expression.
a
Packet Pg. 32
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
D
r
a
f
t
2
0
2
4
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
H
i
s
t
o
r
y
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 33
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 34
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 35
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 36
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 37
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 38
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 39
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 40
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 41
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 42
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)
b
Packet Pg. 43
At
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
U
r
b
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
D
r
a
f
t
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
)