Loading...
BLD2023-1596+Inspection Report+12.12.2023_9.18.18_AM+3947205y WASHINGTON STATE Recreation and Conservation Office Inspection Report EDMONDS YOST PARK, 12/02/21 Current Status: Accepted Inspection Details IM Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Method: Desk & Field Review Data Sources: RCO project file, Sponsor webpage, Snohomish County Assessor webpage, Google maps, in -person inspection Compliance Area: Edmonds Yost Park Inspected By: CPopek Inspection Date & Time: 12/02/21 12:30 PM Inspection Reference #: 2945 Inspection Note: The site was inspected on 12/02/2021 at 12:30pm. Worksites Inspected City of Edmonds Project # Project Name Proj Type WorkSite Name Status Primary Pgm 06-1674 Shell Creek Property Closed Completed WWRP - RPA - RP Acq #1 Shell Creek Property Sponsor Contacts City of Edmonds Person Name Angie Feser Edmonds City of Brian McIntosh Questions All Projects Project Role Project Contact Alt Project Contact Phone Number (425) 361-5697 Email Address angie.feseroedmondswa.gov #1: Function - Does the site continue to function as originally approved and as reflected in the project agreement(s)? If no or unsure, describe how or why. Unsure. During the site visit, staff were unable to find public access into the property. It is unclear how the city is managing the site, it appears to be as open space. Please contact Chris Popek at christopher.popek@rco.wa.gov to discuss. #2: Worktypes (or Elements) - Are the workypes (or elements) funded by the grant in conformance with the project agreement? If no or unsure, describe the worktypes (or elements) that are missing, no longer functioning as intended, or obsolete. N/A. #3: Missing Worktypes (or Elements) - If there are missing or non-functioning worktypes (or elements), do they negatively affect the function of the project overall? If no, process a minor element change. If yes, describe the negative effects and process a major element change. N/A. #4: Project Area - Does the project area continue to function as originally intended without impairment from other public or private non -project related uses? If no, describe the non -project related uses in the project area. Yes. #5: Indoor Facilities - Is the project area free of ineligible indoor facilities? If no, describe the ineligible indoor facilities in the project area. Yes. #6: Ineligible Facilities - If there is an ineligible facility in the project area, has it been approved by RCO? N/A. #7: Funding Acknowledgement - Are the funding programs and partners acknowledged at the site? This question does not apply to acquisition projects with conservation easements. No. A funding acknowledgement sign was not found during the inspection, a sign will be sent to the sponsor to install. #8: Funding Acknowledgement - If the acknowledgement sign is missing, has the sign requirement been waived by RCO? This question does not apply to acquisition projects with conservation easements. No. The funding acknowledgement sign requirement has not been waived by RCO, the sign is missing, a new sign will be sent to the sponsor to install. #9: Management - Does the project sponsor manage and operate the project area? If no, identify the site operator or concessionaire. This question does not apply to acquisition projects with conservation easements. 12/02/2021 Inspection Page 1 of 3 Date printed 12/21/2021 Yes. Acquisition Projects #1: Property Boundary - Is the property (or the 6f boundary) intact without the appearance of any property rights conveyed for non -project related uses? If no, describe the potential property interests conveyed for non -project uses. No. Adjacent landowner appears to be using a section of the property for parking of vehicles and trailers. #2: Property Ownership - Is the property still owned by the project sponsor? Yes. #3: Property Ownership - If the property is no longer owned by the project sponsor, is it owned by an entity eligible to receive a grant in the funding program(s)? For yes or no, identify who now owns the property. N/A. #4: Interim Uses - For acquisition projects that have not yet been developed or restored as originally intended, are the interim uses of the project in agreement with grant program policies? If no, describe the interim uses and whether they have been previously approved by RCO. N/A. #5: Future Development or Restoration - For acquisition projects acquired for future development or restoration, has the site been developed or restored within 5 years? If yes, describe how the site has been developed or restored. No. No development since project area was acquired. All Acq projects and RCFB Dev and Rst projects #1: Public Use - Is the project area available for public use? If no, describe how the area is not available for public use. This question does not apply to acquisition projects with conservation easements. No. No public access or use on the site which remains undeveloped. #2: Public Use - If there is no public use, has it been waived by RCO? This question does not apply to acquisition projects with conservation easements. No. There is no documentation of RCO waiving or restricting public access. #3: Public Use - If there is a public use restriction in the project area, will it last 180 days or less? This question does not apply to acquisition projects with conservation easements. No. See above. Acquisition projects with conservation easements #1: Conservation Easement Terms - Are the terms of the farmland, habitat, or recreation conservation easement being met? If no, describe the potential easement issues? This question only applies to acquisition projects with conservation easements. N/A. #2: Conservation Easement Monitoring - Has the project sponsor submitted an easement monitoring report at least once in the last five years? If yes, identify the date of the report and the PRISM attachment number. This question only applies to acquisition projects with conservation easements. N/A. Acquisition and Restoration Projects #1: Specific Species - If the project was originally funded for a specific plant or animal and that species has been lost from the project area, is the loss something that was out of the project sponsor's control? If no, describe the impacts to the species that were within the project sponsor's control. This question applies to restoration projects and only those acquisition projects where the primary purpose is "habitat conservation" or "habitat restoration". N/A. #2: Functioning Habitat - If the project was not originally funded for a specific plant or animal, does the project area continue to provide properly functioning habitat conditions? If no, describe how the project area lacks functioning habitat. This question applies to restoration projects and only those acquisition projects where the primary purpose is "habitat conservation" or "habitat restoration". Yes. #3: Stewardship Plan - If there is a stewardship plan for the project area, has the project sponsor followed the details outlined in the plan? If not, describe what has not been implemented. This question applies to SRFB projects and only those WWRP projects with the stewardship plan in the scope of work. N/A. 12/02/2021 Inspection Page 2 of 3 Date printed 12/21/2021 Attachments ALL PHOTOS AND FILES Attachment Type Title File Name User, Attach Date Map: Boundary map — Final Shell Creek Project Shell Creek Project Boundary ChristopherP, 12/15/2021 Boundary Map.pdf Map.pdf Inspection Photos Shell Creek Property Shell Creek Property 12.02.2021 ChristopherP, 12/16/2021 12.02.2021 Compliance Compliance Inspection 2.pdf Inspection 2.pdf Issues/Tasks From This Inspection 11111W�- # Issue/Task Title Type SubType Status Assigned Relationships 608 Shell Creek Property- Compliance Other Open CPopek Shell Creek Property_(06-1674 Acq)PROJECT Ci of No Public Access Issue issue #2945: Edmonds Yost Park, 12/2/21, 06-1674 Aca. Edmonds Compliance, Christopher P. Edmonds City ofINSPECTION Other Open Issues/Tasks # Issue/Task Title Type SubType Status Assigned Relationships Spons� 12/02/2021 Inspection Page 3 of 3 Date printed 12/21/2021