REV1 REVIEWED BLD2023-1397+LETTER OF CHANGES+5.29.2024_9.11.24_PM+4289133PRIOR TO DEMO
During the initial structural
assessment prior to the demo, the
structural engineers expected there to
be a structural support beam running
perpendicular to the joists in the main
level ceiling / top level floor.
L
...............................................
REVIEWED
BY
CITY OF EDMONDS
BUILDING DEPARTMENT;
INFILL EXIST OPENING
(NON-STRUCTURAL)
N N
LPL LL
X X
N N
N N
EXIST BEAM
BM205
I
POCKET BEAM J �
PER 5/S3.1 �
m
BLD2023-1397
./
°'"
,6 o
`S3� 4x10
(V
V
o EXIST FLOOR
z
JOISTS
0
J
EXIST BEAM Q
LL N
N
X
LOADS TO THESE POST
DECREASING OVERALL
HDR
✓IDE)
REVISION
May 30 2024
CITY OF EDMONDS
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
EXIST BEAM
Ln
Ln
0
0
LL
0
0
0
J
LL
— — — — — — t
—
— —
—
CONNECT HOLDOWN
— TO FOUNDATION PER
DIET 1/S3.1
ST 4xg HDR
(VFY/P
POST -DEMO ADJUSTMENTS (3/21/24)
y�
,
1,
�FILLEN
ST
PENING
o
After demo, it was discovered that I
(NON-
R
URAI)i
LL
I s WL LL
a x r
there was not a beam where I 4x10JOIST BLKGW/HU
C
BEAM
l g
X LL00
I !Q ^
HANGER EA SIDE BELOW
P
expected. Instead, the joists ran the I POST ABOVE
full width of the house.
G
I 0
o
1 4x10 4#2 ILI
�I
To ensure proper support for the top o
HDR _F7
15,_31n„
i
EXIST 4x6HDR
level, structural engineers ,
(VFY/PROVIDE)
N
x
N
�
recommended the addition of sister XVT
x
I EXIST FLOOR
joists in main level ceiling /top level
'GISTS
O
SI NEW JOIST TO EXIST uX, -
•+
W/ROWS 16d NAILS @
f l o o r. 12" 4C STAGGERED, TYP. (4)
ao
0
EXIST BEAM
LOC TIONS
n
,..,
N
;:�
"
X L
N X
14
X
v/
x
c
t; w
X
�
W
`
W
IK1
M
I
I
I
VERIFY EXIST JOIST / MIN 2"
BEARING ON WALL.INEW JOIST
MAY BE CUT AT FACE OF
— — — —
—
WALL, TYP. (4) �C TIONS
EXIST BEAM
BEAM
Ln
0
O
O
LL
h