Loading...
DNS BLD2021-0810+Infiltration_Report+7.23.2021_8.53.06_AM+2317835COBALT G E 0 S C I E N C E S Preliminary Infiltration Evaluation Proposed Four Lot Plat Parcel No. 00452000400800 Edmonds, Washington February 27, 2019 PRELIMINARY INFILTRATION EVALUATION EDMONDS, WASHINGTON Table of Contents i.o INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................. 1 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................... 1 4.o FIELD INVESTIGATION............................................................................................... 2 4.1.1 Site Investigation Program................................................................................... 2 5.0 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS.............................................................. 2 5.1.1 Area Geology........................................................................................................ 2 5.1.2 Groundwater........................................................................................................ 3 6.o DISCUSSION................................................................................................................... 4 6.1.1 General.................................................................................................................4 7.o RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................. 4 7.1.1 Water Quality and Regulatory Guidance............................................................... 4 7.1.2 Preliminary Infiltration Recommendations.......................................................... 4 8.o CLOSURE......................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A — Statement of General Conditions Appendix B — Figures Appendix C — Exploration Logs Appendix D — Sieve Analyses PRELIMINARY INFILTRATION EVALUATION EDMONDS, WASHINGTON February 27, 2019 i.o Introduction COBALT GEOSCIENCES In accordance with your authorization, Cobalt Geosciences, LLC (Cobalt) has completed a preliminary infiltration evaluation for the proposed four lot plat located at 7901 - 240th Street SW in Edmonds, Washington (Figure 1). The purpose of the investigation was to identify subsurface conditions and to provide preliminary recommendations for infiltration system design, including infiltration rates for use in shallow and deep injection systems. 2.0 Project Description The project includes subdivision of the parcel into four new lots followed by construction of four new residences and an access roadway. The provided site plans indicate that the roadway will extend north along the western portion of the property and the residences will be situated generally to fit a relatively steep slope in the central portion of the property. Stormwater management may include infiltration devices (if feasible), detention, rain gardens, and/or detention systems. We should be provided with the plans to verify that our recommendations are valid. Deep infiltration wells, known as Underground Injection Control (UIC) wells, could be utilized depending on the depth to suitable soils with adequate clearance above groundwater. 3.0 Site Description The site is located at 7901 — 240th Street SW in Edmonds, Washington (Figure 1). The property consists of one rectangular shaped parcel (No. 00452000400800) with a total area of about o.9 acres. Based on a review of historic aerial photographs, the property has previously been developed with residential structures from at least 1958 up to the early to mid-196os. Currently, the property is undeveloped and vegetated with grasses, ivy, blackberry vines, along with variable diameter deciduous and evergreen trees. The site slopes from west to east at variable magnitudes. There is a steep slope within the central portion of the property that extends north to south and slopes to the east. The slope is generally 8 to 16 feet in height and has magnitudes of 30 to ioo percent. The western and eastern portions of the property are gently sloping to nearly level and the western portion appears to have been graded as an access roadway at one time. The site is bordered to the north, west, and east by residential developments and to the south by 240th Street SW. PO Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 cobaltgeo@gmail.com 2o6-331-1097 PRELIMINARY INFILTRATION EVALUATION EDMONDS, WASHINGTON February 27, 2019 4.o Field Investigation 4.1.1 Site Investigation Program COBALT G E 0 S C I E N C E S The field investigation program was completed on August 30, 2018 and included excavating and sampling five test pits within the property for subsurface analysis. We also drilled two hollow stem auger borings on December 7, 2018 and January 11, 2019 to evaluate the deeper subsurface soil and groundwater conditions. The borings were drilled using hollow stem auger truck -mounted and track -mounted rigs. Disturbed soil samples were obtained during drilling by using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) as described in ASTM D-1586. The Standard Penetration Test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2-inch outside -diameter, split barrel sampler into the subsoil with a 140-pound hammer free falling a vertical distance of 30 inches. The summation of hammer -blows required to drive the sampler the final 12-inches of an 18-inch sample interval is defined as the Standard Penetration Resistance, or N- value. The blow count is presented graphically on the boring logs in this appendix. The resistance, or "N" value, provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or of the relative consistency of cohesive soils. The soils encountered were logged in the field and are described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). A Cobalt Geosciences field representative conducted the explorations, collected disturbed soil samples, classified the encountered soils, kept a detailed log of the explorations, and observed and recorded pertinent site features. The results of the explorations are presented on the logs enclosed in Appendix C. Laboratory analyses are also included in Appendix D. 5.o Soil and Groundwater Conditions 5-m Area Geology The site lies within the Puget Lowland. The lowland is part of a regional north -south trending trough that extends from southwestern British Columbia to near Eugene, Oregon. North of Olympia, Washington, this lowland is glacially carved, with a depositional and erosional history including at least four separate glacial advances/retreats. The Puget Lowland is bounded to the west by the Olympic Mountains and to the east by the Cascade Range. The lowland is filled with glacial and non -glacial sediments consisting of interbedded gravel, sand, silt, till, and peat lenses. The Geologic Map of the Edmonds East and West Quadrangle indicates that the site is underlain by Vashon Glacial Till. 2 PO Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 cobaltgeo@gmail.com 2o6-331-1097 PRELIMINARY INFILTRATION EVALUATION EDMONDS, WASHINGTON February 27, 2019 L � COBALT GEOSCIENCES Vashon Glacial Till is typically characterized by an unsorted, non -stratified mixture of clay, silt, sand, gravel, cobbles and boulders in variable quantities. These materials are typically dense and relatively impermeable. The poor sorting reflects the mixing of the materials as these sediments were overridden and incorporated by the glacial ice. Vashon Glacial Till is typically underlain by Vashon Advance Outwash. These materials consist of fine to medium grained sand with local interbeds of silt. Regional groundwater is often located near the base of the Vashon Advance Outwash unit. These deposits are typically permeable and suitable for infiltration of stormwater runoff. Test Pits In general, the test pits encountered variable thicknesses of topsoil and vegetation underlain by up to 8 feet of loose to dense fill. The fill appears to be thickest along the upper bench in the western portion of the property extending over and into the steep slope in the central portion of the property. The fill was underlain by weathered and/or unweathered glacial till which consists of medium dense to very dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel. It appears that the site was graded on one or more occasions during previous site development activities. The depth and extent of the fill could not be fully determined through test pit excavations due to access limitations. Soil Borings Both borings encountered approximately 8 to 12 inches of topsoil and vegetation underlain by about 3 to 5.5 feet of loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel and local debris (Fill). This layer was underlain by approximately 18 to 23 feet of medium dense to very dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel (Glacial Till). This layer was underlain by fine to medium grained sand trace to some gravel (Advance Outwash), which continued to the termination depths of the borings. 5.1.2 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in any of the test pits. We anticipate that perched groundwater could be present at the site within 10 feet below existing grades during the winter and early spring months. This groundwater would consist of shallow perched interflow between fill and weathered glacial till and underlying unweathered glacial till. Groundwater was not encountered in B-1 during our investigation. Groundwater was encountered in B-2 at a depth of 58 feet below grade. Groundwater was measured in B-2 on January 11, 2019 and February 15, 2019 at 57.2 and 56.8 feet below grade respectively. This groundwater likely represents a more regional groundwater table and is generally consistent with the elevation of nearby Lake Ballinger. Water table elevations often fluctuate over time. The groundwater level will depend on a variety of factors that may include seasonal precipitation, irrigation, land use, climatic conditions and soil permeability. Water levels at the time of the field investigation may be different from those encountered during the construction phase of the project. 3 PO Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 cobaltgeo@gmail.com 2o6-331-1097 PRELIMINARY INFILTRATION EVALUATION EDMONDS, WASHINGTON February 27, 2019 6.o DISCUSSION 6.1.1 General COBALT G E 0 S C I E N C E S Shallow infiltration is limited due to the presence of variable thicknesses of low -permeability Vashon Glacial Till. Based on our field explorations, a moderately thick sequence of unsaturated and permeable Vashon Advance Outwash is present beneath the low -permeability till and likely underlies the entire project area. The unsaturated Vashon Advance Outwash has the capacity to infiltrate treated stormwater runoff via UIC wells, allowing the water to slowly infiltrate downward to the regional Vashon Advance Outwash aquifer. Alternatively, it may be feasible to utilize infiltration trenches or galleries excavated through the upper glacial till and into the top of the underlying Vashon Advance Outwash. In either case, the depth to the outwash soils will vary throughout the property. Excavations of 20 to 30 feet below existing grades will likely be required to penetrate through the till and into the outwash soils. 7.o Recommendations 7.1.1 Water Quality and Regulatory Guidance Stormwater that flows into the UIC wells or other infiltration systems should flow through pretreatment facilities (bioretention swales or other approved devices/systems) designed to meet the Washington State Department of Ecology's (DOE) water quality requirements presented in Guidance for UIC Wells That Manage Stormwater Runoff, Publication Number 05-10-o67 (DOE UIC Manual, 2oo6) or any relevant updated versions that are applicable to this project. Treated stormwater flows that enter the UIC wells should be conveyed via an underdrain pipe below the bioretention swales or other system. The bioretention swales or other system should be designed in accordance with the 2014 DOE Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington requirements. 7.1.2 Preliminary Infiltration Recommendations UIC Wells We performed in situ infiltration tests in B-1 and B-2 in early February 2019. The testing included an approximate 3 to 4 hour saturation period until a steady inflow rate was achieved. Measurements were taken every minute to verify a consistent inflow rate and height of testing water above the base of the well. Measurements were collected after the inflow was stopped until all of the water infiltrated beyond the well zones. Based on our calculations from the site testing in conjunction with sieve analyses on collected soil samples, we estimate that new 6-inch diameter wells may be capable of infiltrating 20 gallons per minute (gpm) of treated stormwater into the unsaturated outwash soils. 4 PO Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 cobaltgeo@gmail.com 2o6-331-1097 PRELIMINARY INFILTRATION EVALUATION EDMONDS, WASHINGTON February 27, 2019 L � COBALT GEOSCIENCES The infiltration receptor horizon (Vashon Advance Outwash) is not homogeneous. Deeper portions of the Vashon Advance Outwash may have a lower infiltration rate because the grain size consists of finer sand than the upper tested portions. Due to the depth to groundwater and a required minimum 5 feet clearance above groundwater, the length of screen in UIC wells will likely be limited to about 15 feet. Since the underlying outwash can vary in composition and the depth to outwash will vary throughout the site, we recommend testing of at least two production wells in order to determine if additional or fewer wells are required for the project. We should be provided with the site plans and details of both surface and subsurface storm systems for review prior to submission for permitting. Other Systems The site is underlain by local areas of fill, glacial till, and at depth by advance outwash. Infiltration in fill and glacial till is not feasible at this site. Infiltration is feasible in the underlying advance outwash deposits; however, infiltration basins will require significant excavation in order to allow for infiltration that DOE does not consider deep injection. DOE considers any system that includes an excavation or hole that is deeper than the largest surface dimension and/or utilizes perforated pipe to disperse flow into the subsurface soils to be UIC wells and must be constructed and maintained per their requirements (see DOE Guidance for UIC Wells that Manage Stormwater). UIC wells must be registered with DOE. If a large infiltration system is constructed at the site, we anticipate that excavations of at least 20 feet will be required to penetrate through the glacial till and into the underlying outwash. Based on our testing from the borings, a preliminary infiltration rate of 2 inches per hour may be used for the outwash soils. The side walls (but not the bottom) of the deep infiltration gallery should be lined with a layer of non- woven filter fabric (MIRAFI 14oN). The trenches/galleries are then to be filled with clean washed 3/4 to 1-- 1/2 inch gravel or other approved clean rock up to the design elevation. The gravel particles should be clean and not coated with mud. Depending on the system design, it may be necessary to cap the gallery with a minimum thickness of `impermeable' fill. This could include on site glacial till compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified proctor. It may be necessary to locally amend these soils with additional fines (clay or silt) to prevent surface waters and precipitation from flowing into the infiltration system. We can provide additional recommendations once a general stormwater management system is designed. We should be provided with final plans for review to determine if the intent of our recommendations has been incorporated or if additional modifications are needed. Verification testing of infiltration systems should be performed during construction. 8.o Closure This report was prepared for the exclusive use of Luke Shamp and his appointed consultants. Any use of this report or the material contained herein by third parties, or for other than the intended purpose, should first be approved in writing by Cobalt Geosciences, LLC. The recommendations contained in this report are based on assumed continuity of soils with those of our test holes, and assumed structural loads. Cobalt Geosciences should be provided with final architectural and civil drawings when they become available in order that we may review our design recommendations and advise of any revisions, if necessary. 5 PO Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 cobaltgeo@gmail.com 2o6-331-1097 PRELIMINARY INFILTRATION EVALUATION EDMONDS, WASHINGTON February 27, 2019 COBALT GEOSCIENCES Use of this report is subject to the Statement of General Conditions provided in Appendix A. It is the responsibility of Luke Shamp who is identified as "the Client" within the Statement of General Conditions, and its agents to review the conditions and to notify Cobalt Geosciences should any of these not be satisfied. Respectfully submitted, Cobalt Geosciences, LLC Original signed by: Phil Haberman, PE, LG, LEG Principal PH/se 6 PO Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 cobaltgeo ftmail. co m 2o6-331-1097 uwD \ 111 WIMAI Statement of General Conditions Statement of General Conditions USE OF THIS REPORT: This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of the Client or its agent and may not be used by any third parry without the express written consent of Cobalt Geosciences and the Client. Any use which a third parry makes of this report is the responsibility of such third party. BASIS OF THE REPORT: The information, opinions, and/or recommendations made in this report are in accordance with Cobalt Geosciences present understanding of the site specific project as described by the Client. The applicability of these is restricted to the site conditions encountered at the time of the investigation or study. If the proposed site specific project differs or is modified from what is described in this report or if the site conditions are altered, this report is no longer valid unless Cobalt Geosciences is requested by the Client to review and revise the report to reflect the differing or modified project specifics and/or the altered site conditions. STANDARD OF CARE: Preparation of this report, and all associated work, was carried out in accordance with the normally accepted standard of care in the state of execution for the specific professional service provided to the Client. No other warranty is made. INTERPRETATION OF SITE CONDITIONS: Soil, rock, or other material descriptions, and statements regarding their condition, made in this report are based on site conditions encountered by Cobalt Geosciences at the time of the work and at the specific testing and/or sampling locations. Classifications and statements of condition have been made in accordance with normally accepted practices which are judgmental in nature; no specific description should be considered exact, but rather reflective of the anticipated material behavior. Extrapolation of in situ conditions can only be made to some limited extent beyond the sampling or test points. The extent depends on variability of the soil, rock and groundwater conditions as influenced by geological processes, construction activity, and site use. VARYING OR UNEXPECTED CONDITIONS: Should any site or subsurface conditions be encountered that are different from those described in this report or encountered at the test locations, Cobalt Geosciences must be notified immediately to assess if the varying or unexpected conditions are substantial and if reassessments of the report conclusions or recommendations are required. Cobalt Geosciences will not be responsible to any party for damages incurred as a result of failing to notify Cobalt Geosciences that differing site or sub -surface conditions are present upon becoming aware of such conditions. PLANNING, DESIGN, OR CONSTRUCTION: Development or design plans and specifications should be reviewed by Cobalt Geosciences, sufficiently ahead of initiating the next project stage (property acquisition, tender, construction, etc), to confirm that this report completely addresses the elaborated project specifics and that the contents of this report have been properly interpreted. Specialty quality assurance services (field observations and testing) during construction are a necessary part of the evaluation of sub -subsurface conditions and site preparation works. Site work relating to the recommendations included in this report should only be carried out in the presence of a qualified geotechnical engineer; Cobalt Geosciences cannot be responsible for site work carried out without being present. LIVIWIJAZ 1WIII Figures: Vicinity Map, Site Plan 8.2 PO Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 cobaltgeo ftmail. co m 206-331-1097 122-22.000W 3s84 122°19.000' W PU WASHINGTON �, {ty. ■ +� c a r ¢ - N C > �' n9th 9t'SW �.. N N �'. •� m1 , t7 •. - 11 . N L /29 OthI ;t 'SW .3: 1 d a••u r, a Utq nr-. Edmonds ``�j Q d 'L a >• < ;« f I 2 - �� •�m L _ I Project li• •�r ' t Cl"'il h I �•� a Location I sw 5. Su`� �1 :_, - .10 e< _ _ 4r i /a �> I •� - I' • I- rQ''I hth. �t-SW '� 7 Z t3ih �t SW �10th L t tN' ' �!. i h' ' 3 OF 'r•-••22oth 222nd St W' 99 1 '> 224th S , SW " / a 24th �� W . i' !1 1 0 24th St SW s i ' - �`'• 1 3 :Q> .� i c• s 3. m ? i •{lac :~ �'o,• e+2LtshS SW v •; 22ih5 541�)•�tlt 5t5 - , `>A},e,(�-� 31nh StS4"Jt. - II' q.00 �I Q Q• ` - Q �lafi '..ln5 �. aoi~ ° -. II = > _ .c23tkh SW •_ oJyl ]tip n-3�• _ ....L.. o, 2nd f1.S-.W -Holly L`n . I • ' I •v �s .\ t ind c['CW ndIs SW Y .. ry.�. . i. Maple Ln ��� •1 :. I¢ i I \ _ ,I `I e dFU 2341h5 SW 23tn 4thRSl11 c 3 'S ISW c m dt • i s13stnstsw41 • - :p toad •:7, �. - •I ` Q > :238th.St'Allk ` d<r. - ' Labe i r¢ I yL 40tFi'SrsW i BallinpF: I+ t - ~t T a Of III st SIw NMI-" v- A•f 4�nd St t f r - '43[h ��S.W •H t06 __z44th St'SVIf^ 205th t'lE.2n5tn_S ?.4�40St SW r7 203rd w _ !. - ^` _rz 1II a- f1 202nd'S � r n 20 rd sc a. _ �� f -Z� t a z ; I' d , n 2atst St > '� 1 NW A It ch a' N 200th`'St - m $• _ ti [ Q �� ¢' = 9th Li 112 I G r=' 55th 't• /� IN 196[h St I, �y�) •a'= m. oN z w ' •' _`.. N. 4 t 'r/ a • N 19Sth 9t -> •z la - •�� e� �.• ; � •o � + 99 _ ' 3 N 19Uth R -_ N 190th Sr pp> i.-A .. I f` ,It � I -Q � 'z !N 18St ti Si = • o � R I - �. � -> .t ', L 1 � S I I _ '; rJ 9E5th_G�>a � �"' NE 1C5th•St,' � _ t w i w z w wr c�► r• 3 t m z 3 J: �;• �_..«_ .. ! +I > uu L ' � JZ '.'q> .•QC 111 QIL jai 4. ¢ r�N SOthiS I f�°,a �?- h s Bth.St N,i y�; to .� •q - I 1 ,tl• •--S „ t rI = NW 7 thiSt ctJe:ZSthSt '7•1 _ - 1i - •Z I• �� I�f7 777 M iI Ronald � � �o .l•, tTz+c �� � y S�hob� P"ter r _;;a N 1'7.Otn St r T Plap C ar m •,Th' 2010 Napona Ge�lyrahy_ 2C 07 TelerP z 0 0 7 7 C XT 0 5 1 TN MPJ NATIONAL MILES I � 1000 20D0 30D0 4000 5000 15'h` GEOGRAPHIC _ _ a Klto�tt�.; FEET t 'Iff, _ • A METERS 1r01 09/13/11 Cobalt Geosciences, LLC Proposed Four Lot Plat VICINITY P.O. Box 82243 24oth Street SW MAP Kenmore, 1OA 98028 () 33 • S C I E N C E S Edmonds, Washington FIGURE i www.cobaltgeoeo.com cobaltgeo(&gmail.com 1 »<».nnrr w 1 »<•:;1-nnn' w �OQ 1r. Q�NF I� NE171. S 1EIr NE-1 A 177-?n frnir' w vv ,,q4 1?;,o19. nnfr' w FND 1/7- RERAR W/CAP W 0.40* OF CALC. CORNER —111-< * 1. v .3 492 10. 4 17 f 0, 317 , 1114. - HELD an a. AND ENCROACHES 02 c N. Li 140.9 34DA CONC.ENCROACHES 41.0 340'2 IN 00W5W E W-A& 0()'51*0'r E 310-37 PLAT 71 310.670 MEA!L' 33963 ,39W 33M Alo 0 39,460 so. Fr. 3W i ! �^.. ...----- i 0.906WCRtE 34U 336.4 36 350 42.1 all 7 'TOP 4pf 46. 10 33U % 3 4- 30A 10. 331%.� 1 14. 2• 0. 2- 12' 33" 351A ITOF` 351. 33U 33962 35U TOP OF BANK O357.2 le 357J 3WA 357.4 255� t-4 .......... 310-08' PLAT 310.W MFA&��- • mo___� S 0031'07' W PLAT S OVWW W W-Al TOP 32B.0 3MAOP OF BA 38L9 msx FNO 1/2- REBAR SENT OVER w 1 0' 3678 36'.9 0 2- 35 APPENDIX C Exploration Logs Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION Clean Gravels Gw Well -graded gravels, gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines Gravels (more than 50% (less than 5% fines) GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines COARSE GRAINED SOILS of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve) Gravels with Fines (more than 12% fines) GM Silty gravels, gravel -sand -silt mixtures GC Clayey gravels, gravel -sand -clay mixtures (more than 50% retained on Clean Sands :•: sw Well -graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines No. 200 sieve) Sands (50% or more of coarse fraction (less than 5% fines) sP Poorly graded sand, gravelly sands, little or no fines passes the No. 4 sieve) Sands with Fines sM Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures (more than 12% fines) sc Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures ML Inorganic silts of low to medium plasticity, sandy silts, gravelly silts, FINE GRAINED (50% or more Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50) Inorganic cL or clayey silts with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays silty clays, lean clays Organic rganic oL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity passes the MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sands or silty soils, No. 200 sieve) Silts and Clays (liquid limit 50 or more) Inorganic elastic silt CH Inorganic clays of medium to high plasticity, sandy fat clay, or gravelly fat clay Organic OHOrganic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silts HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat, humus, swamp soils with high organic content (ASTM D4427) Classification of Soil Constituents MAJOR constituents compose more than 50 percent, by weight, of the soil. Major constituents are capitalized (i.e., SAND). Minor constituents compose 12 to 50 percent of the soil and precede the major constituents (i.e., silty SAND). Minor constituents preceded by "slightly" compose 5 to 12 percent of the soil (i.e., slightly silty SAND). Trace constituents compose o to 5 percent of the soil (i.e., slightly silty SAND, trace gravel). Relative Density (Coarse Grained Soils) Consistency (Fine Grained Soils) N, SPT, Relative N, SPT, Relative Blows/FT Density Blows/FT Consistency 0-4 Very loose Under 2 Very soft 4 -10 Loose 2-4 Soft 10 - 30 Medium dense 4-8 Medium stiff 30 - 50 Dense 8 -15 Stiff Over 50 Very dense 15 - 30 Very stiff Over 3o Hard Grain Size Definitions Description Sieve Number and/or Size Fines <#200 (o.o8 mm) Sand -Fine #200 to #40 (o.o8 to 0.4 mm) -Medium #40 to #10 (0.4 to 2 mm) -Coarse #10 to #4 (2 to 5 mm) Gravel -Fine #4 to 3/4 inch (5 to 19 mm) -Coarse 3/4 to 3 inches (19 to 76 mm) Cobbles 3 to 12 inches (75 to 305 mm) Boulders >12 inches (305 mm) 1 Moisture Content Definitions 1 Dry Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Moist Damp but no visible water Wet Visible free water, from below water table Cobalt Geosciences, LLC P.O. Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 Soil Classification Chart Figure Ci (2o6) 331-1097 _ www.cobaltgeo.com cobaltgeo(&gmail.com Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION Clean Gravels Gw Well -graded gravels, gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines Gravels (more than 50% (less than 5% fines) GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines COARSE GRAINED SOILS of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve) Gravels with Fines (more than 12% fines) GM Silty gravels, gravel -sand -silt mixtures GC Clayey gravels, gravel -sand -clay mixtures (more than 50% retained on Clean Sands :•: sw Well -graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines No. 200 sieve) Sands (50% or more of coarse fraction (less than 5% fines) sP Poorly graded sand, gravelly sands, little or no fines passes the No. 4 sieve) Sands with Fines sM Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures (more than 12% fines) sc Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures ML Inorganic silts of low to medium plasticity, sandy silts, gravelly silts, FINE GRAINED (50% or more Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50) Inorganic cL or clayey silts with slight plasticity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays silty clays, lean clays Organic rganic oL Organic silts and organic silty clays of low plasticity passes the MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sands or silty soils, No. 200 sieve) Silts and Clays (liquid limit 50 or more) Inorganic elastic silt CH Inorganic clays of medium to high plasticity, sandy fat clay, or gravelly fat clay Organic OHOrganic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silts HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor PT Peat, humus, swamp soils with high organic content (ASTM D4427) Classification of Soil Constituents MAJOR constituents compose more than 50 percent, by weight, of the soil. Major constituents are capitalized (i.e., SAND). Minor constituents compose 12 to 50 percent of the soil and precede the major constituents (i.e., silty SAND). Minor constituents preceded by "slightly" compose 5 to 12 percent of the soil (i.e., slightly silty SAND). Trace constituents compose o to 5 percent of the soil (i.e., slightly silty SAND, trace gravel). Relative Density (Coarse Grained Soils) Consistency (Fine Grained Soils) N, SPT, Relative N, SPT, Relative Blows/FT Density Blows/FT Consistency 0-4 Very loose Under 2 Very soft 4 -10 Loose 2-4 Soft 10 - 30 Medium dense 4-8 Medium stiff 30 - 50 Dense 8 -15 Stiff Over 50 Very dense 15 - 30 Very stiff Over 3o Hard Grain Size Definitions Description Sieve Number and/or Size Fines <#200 (o.o8 mm) Sand -Fine #200 to #40 (o.o8 to 0.4 mm) -Medium #40 to #10 (0.4 to 2 mm) -Coarse #10 to #4 (2 to 5 mm) Gravel -Fine #4 to 3/4 inch (5 to 19 mm) -Coarse 3/4 to 3 inches (19 to 76 mm) Cobbles 3 to 12 inches (75 to 305 mm) Boulders >12 inches (305 mm) 1 Moisture Content Definitions 1 Dry Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Moist Damp but no visible water Wet Visible free water, from below water table Cobalt Geosciences, LLC P.O. Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 Soil Classification Chart Figure Ci (2o6) 331-1097 _ www.cobaltgeo.com cobaltgeo(&gmail.com Test Pit TP-i USCS Graphic Topsoil/Vegetation SM Fill 4'............. X................................ ...... SM \ Weathered Glacial Till? 6' ............... ..................... ......... I SM Glacial Till y. Test Pit TP-2 USCS Graphic Topsoil/Vegetation 1' ............................................. ... SM Fill 2' ............ ............................. ...... SM \ Weathered Glacial Till 3' ............... .................../ ........... SM Glacial Till i 0-1' Vegetation/Topsoil 1-4' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel and roots, dark yellowish brown to grayish brown, dry. (Fill) 4-6' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, mottled yellowish brown to grayish brown, moist. (Weathered Glacial Till?) 6-8' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Dense to very dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, grayish brown, moist. (Glacial Till) End of Test Pit 8' No Groundwater No Caving 0-1' Vegetation/Topsoil 1-2' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel and roots, dark yellowish brown to grayishb brown, dry. (Fill) 2-3' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, mottled yellowish brown to grayish brown, dry to moist. (Weathered Glacial Till) 3-10' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Dense to very dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, grayish brown, moist. (Glacial Till) End of Test Pit io' No Groundwater No Caving Test Pit TP-3 Graphic USCS ^� 0-2' Vegetation/Topsoil Topsoil/Vegetation 2'........................................... .... SM Weathered Glacial Till 4................. .......................... .........{ SM Glacial Till ' 2-4' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, mottled yellowish brown to grayish brown, moist. (Glacial Till) 4-7' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Dense to very dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, grayish brown, moist. (Glacial Till) End of Test Pit 7' No Groundwater No Caving Proposed Four Lot Plat 24oth Street SW Edmonds, Washington TEST PIT LOGS Cobalt Geosciences, LLC P.O. Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 (2o6) 331-1097 www.cobaltgeo.com cobaltgeo@gmail.com Test Pit TP-4 USCS Graphic Topsoil/Vegetation SM Fill 6' ............... ..................... ......... SM Glacial Till y Test Pit TP-5 USCS Graphic Topsoil/Vegetation SM Fill 81 ............... ..................... ......... SM Glacial Till i 0-1' Vegetation/Topsoil 1-6' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, asphalt, debris, and roots, dark yellowish brown to grayish brown, dry. (Fill) 6-8' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Dense to very dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, grayish brown, moist. (Glacial Till) End of Test Pit 8' No Groundwater No Caving 0-1' Vegetation/Topsoil 1-8' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, debris, and roots, dark yellowish brown to grayishb brown, dry. (Fill) 8-1o' Silty Sand with Gravel (SM) Dense to very dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel, grayish brown, moist. (Glacial Till) End of Test Pit io' No Groundwater No Caving Proposed Four Lot Plat 24oth Street SW Edmonds, Washington TEST PIT LOGS Cobalt Geosciences, LLC P.O. Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 (2o6) 331-1097 www.cobaltgeo.com cobaltgeo@gmail.com Log of Boring B-1 Date: December 7, 2018 Depth: 46.5' Initial Groundwater: None Observed Contractor: EDI Elevation: - 358' Sample Type: Split Spoon Method: Hollow Stem Auger Logged By: PH Checked By: SC Final Groundwater: N/A 3 0 0 Moisture Content (%) Q Plastic Liquid _ - U E 3 Limit Limit t _ V o o Material Description o m V� o SPT N-Value 2 O 0 10 20 30 40 5 Vegetation/Topsoil --- - -- 3 ------------------------------------------------- SM Loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with — 3 3 gravel and debris, dark yellowish brown to grayish brown, moist. 4 (Fill) —6 - SM Medium dense to very dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with — 9 . , gravel, mottled dark yellowish brown to grayish brown, moist. (Glacial Till) — 12 - 12 — — 14 15 — 15 = —1 8 = 16 16 4.1 o Moisture = 23 — 21 — 24 — 27 = 22 29 4.6%Moisture 50 --- SP - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dense to very dense, fine to medium grained sand trace gravel, grayish brown, moist. (Advance Outwash) 33 12 20 30 ` 6.9% Moisture 36 13 s 16.9% Moisture 39 20 :N� 42 12 20 s 6.7% Moisture 30 45 19 32 - 9.8% Moisture 40 End of Boring 46.5' 48 Well Construction: Flush mount monument; 2-inch diameter pipe, slotted from 33 to 43 feet; sand backfill up to 28 feet below grade. 51 Cobalt Geosciences, LLC P.O. Box 82243 Proposed Short Plat Kenmore, WA 98028 2 oth Street SW Boring (2o6) 381-1097 79XX - 4 www.cobaltgeo.com Edmonds, Washington Log cobaltgeopgmail.com Log of Boring B-2 Date: January 11, 2019 Depth: 61.5' Initial Groundwater: 58' Contractor: EDI Elevation: - 342.5' Sample Type: Split Spoon Method: Hollow Stem Auger Logged By: PH Checked By: SC Final Groundwater: 57.2' 3 0 0 Moisture Content (%) Q Plastic 1 Liquid _ - U E 3 Limit Limit t _ V o o Material Description o m � o SPT N-Value 0 :D O 0 10 20 30 40 50 Vegetation/Topsoil --- - - -- --- SM -------------------------------------------- Loose to medium dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with gravel and debris, dark yellowish brown to grayish brown, moist. ■ — 4 Fil1------------------------------------------ ---- SM Medium dense to very dense, silty -fine to medium grained sand with = gravel, mottled dark yellowish brown to grayish brown, moist. —8 _ Glacial Till — 12 Vp — 16 - —20 = 22 29 4.1 % Moisture = 50 —24 = 1 SP Dense to very dense, fine to medium grained sand trace gravel, 16 :'•,iy �', grayish brown, moist. (Advance Outwash) = 16 23 ' —2 8 22 J _ 29 •ti — 32 _ 50 22 '-N — 36 29 % + 50 4.6% Moisture — 40 22 29 ` 50 44 12 +'; 6.9%Moisture 20 30 _ 48 13 18 16.9% Moisture 52 20 12 _ 56 20 30 6.7% Moisture 60 9 32 4 9.8% Moisture End of Boring 61.5' 64 Well Construction: Flush mount monument; 2-inch diameter pipe, slotted from 37 to 57 feet; sand backfill up to 34 feet below grade. 68 Cobalt Geosciences, LLC P.O. Box 82243 Proposed Short Plat Kenmore, WA 98028 2 oth Street SW Boring (2o6) 381-1097 79XX - 4 www.cobaltgeo.com Edmonds, Washington Log cobaltgeopgmail.com APPENDIX D Laboratory Analyses 100 90 80 70 c LL 60 a) 50 a 40 30 20 10 0 100 100 90 80 70 c E 60 Q) 50 a 40 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution - ASTM D 422 - - Extended Gradation Interpolation • Data - Gradation Functbn • D10 (mm) • D30 (mm) • D60 (-) ---Gravel -----Sand ---Fines d30 d10 O d60 B-1 at 17.5' In 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size (mm) Particle Size Distribution - ASTM D 422 Extended Gradation Interpolation • Data - Gradation Function • D10 (mm) • D30 (mm) • D60 (-) ---Gravel -SandFines d30 a d10 O d60 0.68 1j0.52 0.34 100 10 B-1 at 37.5' 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size (mm) Material Properties Description = Edmonds Soil ID = B-1-17.5 Depth = 17.5 Max D Densl = 0.00 O timum Moisture = 0.00 WD Offset = 0 % Moisture Offset = 4.1 %> 3 In. • 0.00 %> 314In. • 13.40 % Gravel = 36.30 % Sand = 53.70 % Fines = 10.00 PL = 0.00 LL = 0.00 Cu = 41.00 Cc = 0.60 File Name SP-.. Extrapolated Coefficients see Limitations on Input Screen d10 d30 d60 Cu Cc 0.075 0.371 1 3.075 1 41.00 0.60 Material Properties Description = Edmonds Soil ID = B-1-37.5 Depth - 37.5 Max Dry Density = 0.00 Optimum Moisture = 0.00 WD Offset = 0 % Moisture Offset = 16.9 %> 3 In. - 0.00 %> 314In. -0.00 % Gravel = 2.00 % Sand = 96.00 % Fines = 0.00 PL = 0.00 LL = 0.00 Cu = 1.99 Cc = 1.16 File Name SP Extrapolated Coefficients see Limitations on In ut Screen d10 d30 d60 Cu Cc 0.339 0.521 1 0.676 1 1.99 1 1.16 Cobalt Geosciences, LLC COBALT24oth Proposed Four Lot Plat Street SW Edmonds, Washington SIEVE ANALYSES P.O. Box Kenmore,, WA WA 98028 (2o6) 331-1097 www.cobaltgeo.com cobaltgeo(&gmail.com 100 90 80 70 c ii 60 c 50 a 40 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution - ASTM D 422 Extended Gradation Interpolation ♦ Data - Gradation Function • D10(mm) • D30(mm) • D60(mm) -Gravel -Sand -Fines d30 = d10 0 660 0.89 0.61 0.43 _ 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size (mm) B-1 at 42.5' 100 90 80 70 c ii 60 a) 50 a 40 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution - ASTM D 422 Extended Gradation Interpolation • Data - Gradation E..o 0 D10 (mm) D30 (mm) • D60 (mm) -Gmvel -Sand -Flnes 0 d30 0 d10 0 d60 0.68 0.50 0.29 100 10 B-1 at 45' Martial Properties Oescdptlon = Edmonds Soil ID - B4-42.5 Depth = 42.5 Max Dry Density - 0.00 Optimum Moisture - 0.00 WD Offset = 0 % Moisture Offset = 6.7 %>3 in.= 0.00 %>314In. =0.00 % Gravel - 11.50 % Sand - 68.50 % Fines = 0.00 PL = 0.00 LL - 0.00 Cu = 2.08 Cc = 0.97 File Name SP EAra olated Coefficients see Limitations on Input Screen d10 d30 d60 CuT Cc 0.428 1 0.60E 1 0.890 1 2.08 1 0.97 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size (mm) Proposed Four Lot Plat 24oth Street SW Edmonds, Washington Material Properties Description = Edmonds Soil ID = B-1-45 Depth = 45 Max Dry Density = 0.00 Optimum Moisture = 0.00 WD Offset = 0 % Moisture Oftet = 9.8 %>3In. = 0.00 %>314 In. 0.00 % Gravel = 2.80 % Sand = 97.00 % Fines = 0.20 PL = 0.00 LL = 0.00 Cu = 2.33 Cc- 129 File Name SP 6dra olated Coeficients see Limitations on Input Screen d10 d30 d60 CuT Cc 0.291 0.504 1 0.677 1 2.33 1 1.29 Cobalt Geosciences, LLC SIEVE P.O. Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 ANALYSES (2o6) 331-1097 www.cobaltgeo.com cobaltgeo(&gmail.com Particle Size Distribution - ASTM D 422 -- Extended Gradation Interpolation • Data - Gradation Function • D10 (mm) • D30 (mm) • D60 (mm) -Gravel -Sww -Flnes 0 d30 o d10 o d50 100 90 80 >- 70 (D c ii 60 c (D 50 a 40 30 20 10 0 100 B-2 at 30' 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size (mm) Particle Size Distribution - ASTM D 422 ---- Extended Gradation Interpolation • Data Gradation Function • D10 (mm) • 030 (mm) • D60 (mm) -Gravel -Sand -Fines - d30 O d10 d60 100 90 80 a� 70 c u- 60 c a) 50 a. 40 30 20 10 0 • 0.72 0.46 0.30 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 Grain Size (mm) B-2 at 35' Proposed Four Lot Plat 24oth Street SW Edmonds, Washington Material Properties Description = Edmonds Soil ID = B-2-30 Depth = 30 Max Dry Density = 0.00 Optimum Moisture = 0.00 WD Otfset = 0 % Moisture Offset = 5.3 %>3In. = 0.00 %>314 in. =0.00 % Gravel = 0.00 % Sand - 99.80 % Fin" - 0.20 PL - 0.00 LL - 0.00 Cu Cc= 1.04 File Name SP Extrapolated Coefficients see Limitations on In ut Screen d10 d30 d60 Cu Cc 0.224 1 0.319 1 0.440 1 1.96 1 1.04 Material Properties Description = Edmonds Soil ID = B-2-35 Depth = 35 Max Dr Density= 0.00 Optimum Moisture = 0.00 WD Offset = 0 % Moisture Offsat - 4.7 %> 3 In. - 0.00 %>314 in. =0.00 % Gravel = 9.80 % Send = 90.00 % Fines = 0.20 PL . 0.00 LL = 0.00 Cu = 2.40 Ce= 0.98 Flla Nama SP Extrapolated Coefficients see Limita0ons on Input Screen d10 d30 d60 Cu Cc 0.300 1 0.460 1 0.720 1 2.40 1 0.98 Cobalt Geosciences, LLC SIEVE P.O. Box 82243 Kenmore, WA 98028 ANALYSES (2o6) 331-1097 www.cobaltgeo.com cobaltgeo(&gmail.com 100 90 80 >` 70 m c ii 60 c 50 a 40 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution - ASTM D 422 Ddended Gradation Interpolation ♦ Data - Gradation Function D10 (mm) • D30 (mm) a D60 (MM) -Gravel -Sand -Flnes d30 O d10 O d60 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 Grain Size (mm) B-2 at 40' Particle Size Distribution - ASTM D 422 Extended Gradation Interpolation • Data - Gradation Function e D10 (mm) • D30 (mm) • D60 (mm) -Gravel -Sand -Fine. d30 O 00 O d60 100 90 80 70 c LL 60 c 50 a 40 30 20 10 0 100 B-2 at 50' IN 0.56 0.39 0.30 1 0.1 Grain Size (mm) 0.001 Material Properties Description = Edmonds Soil ID = B-2-40 Depth = 40 Max Dry Density = 0.00 Optimum Moisture = 0.00 WD Ofset = 0 % Moisture Offset = 5 %>3In. = 0.00 %>314 in. 0.00 % Gravel = 1.70 % Sand = 97.50 % Fines = 0.80 Pl. = 0.00 ILL = 0.00 Cu = 2.S7 Cc = 0.93 File ..!Sp EA- olaled Coefficients see Limitations on input Screen d10 d30 d60 Cu Cc 0.279 0.432 0.718 1 2.57 i 0.93 0.01 0.001 Material Properties Description = Edmonds Soil ID - B-2-50 Depth = 50 Max Dry Density - 0.00 Optimum Moisture - 0.00 WD Otfset = 0 % Moisture Otfset = 7 %> 3 In. = 0.00 % > 314 In. = 0.00 % Gravel = 1.30 % Sand = 97.20 % Fines = 1.50 PL = 0.00 LL = 0.00 Cu = 1.s9 cc = 9.92 File Name SP E)drapolated Coeficients sea l.imttations on In ut Screen d10 d30 d60 Cu Cc 0.299 0.395 0.565 1.89 0.92 Cobalt Geosciences, LLC COSALT 7G E 0 S C I E N C E S Proposed Four Lot Plat 24oth Street SW Edmonds, Washington SIEVE ANALYSES P.O. Box Kenmore,, WA WA 98028 (2o6) 331-1097 www.cobaltgeo.com cobaltgeo(&gmail.com