REVIEWED PLN BLD2024-0266+ARBORIST REPORT+2.28.2024_12.33.47_PM+4089110Greenforest Incorporated
(�, _90 J_ consulting
TO: Rick Cuevas
REFERENCE: Arborist Report
Arporist
SITE ADDRESS: 648 Walnut Street, Edmonds WA
DATE: August 11, 2021
REPORT REVISION: January 5, 2022
PREPARED BY: Favero Greenforest, ISA Certified Arborist # PN -0143A
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified
ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist® #379
You contacted me and contracted my services as a consulting arborist. My assignment is to
inspect trees at the above referenced site. The purpose of this arborist report is to establish the
condition of the significant trees to satisfy City of Edmonds submittal requirements (Edmonds
Code §23.10.060.B.2.c).
You provided me a topographic survey prepared by Pacific Coast Surveys, Inc., dated
5/29/2020. 1 visited the site 8/10/2021 and visually inspected the trees indicated on the survey,
which are the subject of this report, and represent all regulated trees on the parcel.
REVISED SUMMARY. all 3 onsite trees are proposed for removal.
TREE INSPECTION
I visually inspected each tree from the ground. I performed a Level 1 risk assessment.' This is
the standard assessment for populations of trees near specified targets, conducted in order to
identify obvious defects or specified conditions such as a pre -development inventory. This is a
1 Companion publication to the ANSI A300 Part 9: Tree Shrub and Other woody Plant Management — Standard
Practices, Tree Risk Assessment. 2011. ISA.
4547 South Lucile Street, Seattle, WA 98118 Tel. 206-723-0656
Rick Cuevas
RE: Arborist Report for 648 Walnut Street, Edmonds WA
August 11, 2021
Page 2 of 11
limited visual assessment focuses on identifying trees with imminent and/or probable
likelihood of failure, and/or other visible conditions that will affect tree retention.
I recorded tree species and size (DBH). I estimated the average dripline of each tree. I rated the
condition of each tree, both health and structure. A tree's structure is distinct from its health.
This inspection identifies what is visible with both.
High -risk trees can appear healthy in that they can have a dense, green canopy. This may occur
when there is sufficient sapwood or adventitious roots present to maintain tree health, but
inadequate strength for structural support.
Conversely, trees in poor health may or may not be structurally stable. For example, tree
decline due to root disease is likely to cause the tree to be structurally unstable, while decline
due to drought or insect attack may not.
One way that tree health and structure are linked is that healthy trees are more capable of
compensating for structural defects. A healthy tree can develop adaptive growth that adds
strength to parts weakened by decay, cracks, and wounds.
This report identifies unhealthy trees based on existing health conditions and tree structure,
and specifies which trees are most suitable for preservation .Z No invasive procedures were
performed on any trees. The results of this inspection are based on what was visible at the time
of the inspection.
The attached inventory summarizes my inspection results and provides the following
information for each tree:
Proposed Action — Indicates if tree is to be removed or retained.
Tree number as shown on attached exhibit.
DBH stem diameter in inches measured 4.5 feet from the ground.
Dripline average branch extension from the trunk as radius in feet.
Health and Structure ratings '1' indicates good to excellent condition; no visible health -
related problems or structural defects, 7 indicates fair condition; minor visible
problems or defects that may require attention if the tree is retained, and 'T
indicates poor condition; significant visible problems or defects and tree removal is
recommended.
Comments on Condition obvious structural defects or diseases visible at time of
inspection.
z Companion publication to the ANSI A300 Part 5: Tree Shrub and Other woody Plant Maintenance — Standard
Practices, Managing Trees During Construction. 2008. ISA.
Greenforest O Registered Consulting Arborist
Rick Cuevas
RE: Arborist Report for 648 Walnut Street, Edmonds WA
August 11, 2021
Page 3 of 11
Viability - a determination by the arborist whether the tree is viable for retention, and
complies with §23.10.080.B.1.
SUBJECT TREES
A moss cypress stands at the NE corner of the existing house. The tree is mature (over the hill,
so to speak) and has outlived it useful life as a landscape amenity. If the existing foundation is
removed, the tree will fall over as it relies on it for support.
Four Leyland cypress trees stand in a hedgerow along the west lot boundary. Trees 2 & 3 are
onsite, trees 4 & 5 on the abutting parcel to the west.
Both onsite cypress trees lean SE. Though all four trees were planted in a hedgerow, the trees
have never been maintained as a hedge. As a result, the 'inside' trees (#3) have very
asymmetric and skinny structures because the end trees, in particular tree 2, has out competed
tree 3 for light and space.
The removal of tree 2 will leave tree 3 exposed, asymmetric and leaning. Tree 3 literally has no
branches on the NE side of its trunk, or the SW side, as there are two other cypress trees
opposite on the adjoining parcel.
Below is the municipal definition of a hazard tree, and the exemption clause for removal of a
hazard tree.
23.10.020.H. "Hazard tree" means a tree that is dead, dying, diseased, damaged, or
structurally defective as determined by a qualified tree professional.
23.10.040 Exemptions.
F. Trees that do not meet the exemptions in subsections (A) through (E) of this
section may be removed with supporting documentation:
2. Hazard tree located outside a critical area with a tree risk assessment
prepared by the applicant's qualified professional documenting how the
tree meets the definition of a hazard tree.
It is my opinion that tree #3 having developed inside a hedgerow of 4 trees now lacks the
structural integrity to stand exposed as an edge tree when tree #2 is removed. I recommend
the removal of both trees.
The images on the next page show the 2 onsite cypress trees, their trunks, and their canopies
relative to each other.
Greenforest O Registered Consulting Arborist
TREE 3,
sow
VIEW OF SUBJECT TREES LOOKING WEST
FROM SUBJECT PARCEL
% _,� , �' =,,� ,ice � yy�„ � ``, � •
i
SUBJECT Ott._ • • • • •
I, PARCEL.
ABUTTING
y 7 PARCEL /
�r rF VIEW OF TREE TRUNKS FROM ABUTTING PARCEL
PL IS ILLUSTRATIVE, AND NOT TO SCALE
Rick Cuevas
RE: Arborist Report for 648 Walnut Street, Edmonds WA
August 11, 2021
Page 5 of 11
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Limits of Disturbance (LOD) are calculated for all the subject trees, regardless of viability or
proposed action. They are listed below as radii in feet from the trunk for the side of the tree to
be impacted by construction. They are determined using rootplate 3 and trunk diameter ,4'S and
ISA Best Management Practices .6 These are the minimum distances from the trees for any soil
disturbance on one side of the tree, and assume expanded protection on other sides: 1.5 x LOD
on sides adjacent to encroachment, and no disturbance on the opposite side, or 2 x LOD. The
following table lists the limits of disturbance of each tree.
Proposed
Action
Tree
No.
DBH
Species
Dripline
(R')
LOD
(R')
Remove
1
13.5"
Moss cypress
14'
7'
Remove
2
22"
Leyland cypress
25'
12'
Remove
3
18"
Leyland cypress
25'
10'
Offsite
4
14"
Leyland cypress
20'
8'
Offsite
5
18"
Leyland cypress
20'
10,
To protect the two offsite trees, install tree protection fencing (TPF) along the east side of the
stump of tree #3, parallel the property line for the distance of 8 feet to the north and the south.
Tree protection is outlined in city code here: ECDC §23.10.070 Tree protection measures during
development. Following are abbreviated points, but the full code should be reviewed and
followed.
Prior to development activity or initiating tree removal on the site, vegetated areas, individual
trees and soil to be preserved in accordance with ECDC 23.10.060(B) shall be protected from
potentially damaging activities pursuant to the following standards:
A. Preconstruction Meeting Required. Prior to the commencement of any permitted clearing
and grading activity, a preconstruction meeting shall be held on site with the permittee and
appropriate city staff. The project site shall be marked in the field as follows:
1. The extent of clearing and grading to occur;
2. Delineation and protection of any critical areas and critical area buffers with clearing limit
fencing;
3. Flagging of trees to be removed and tags on trees to be retained; and
4. Property lines.
3 Coder, Kim D. 2005. Tree Biomechanics Series. University of Georgia School of Forest Resources.
4 Smiley, E. Thomas, Ph. D. Assessing the Failure Potential of Tree Roots, Shade Tree Technical Report. Bartlett Tree
Research Laboratories.
5 Fite, Kelby and E. Thomas Smiley. 2009. Managing Trees During construction; Part Two. Arborist News. ISA.
6 Companion publication to the ANSI A300 Series, Part 5: Managing Trees During Construction. 2008. ISA.
Greenforest O Registered Consulting Arborist
Rick Cuevas
RE: Arborist Report for 648 Walnut Street, Edmonds WA
August 11, 2021
Page 6 of 11
B. Placing Materials Near Trees. No person may conduct any activity within the protected area
of any tree designated to remain, including, but not limited to, operating or parking equipment,
placing solvents, storing building material or stockpiling any materials, or dumping concrete
washout or other chemicals. During construction, no person shall attach any object to any tree
designated for protection.
C. Protective Barrier. Before development, land clearing, grading, filling or any land alteration,
the applicant shall:
1. Erect and maintain readily visible temporary protective tree fencing along the limits of
disturbance which completely surrounds the protected area of all retained trees, groups of
trees, vegetation and native soil. Tree protective fencing shall be a minimum height of three
feet, visible and of durable construction; orange polyethylene laminar fencing is acceptable.
2. Install highly visible signs spaced no further than 15 feet apart along the entirety of the
protective tree fencing. Said sign must be approved by the director and shall state, at a
minimum, "Tree and Soil Protection Area, Entrance Prohibited," and provide the city phone
number for code enforcement to report violations.
3. Prohibit excavation or compaction of soil or other potentially damaging activities within the
barriers; provided, that the director may allow such activities approved by a qualified
professional and under the supervision of a qualified professional retained and paid for by the
applicant.
4. Maintain the protective barriers in place for the duration of the project until the director
authorizes their removal.
5. Ensure that any approved landscaping done in the protected zone subsequent to the removal
of the barriers shall be accomplished with machinery from outside the protected zone or by
hand.
6. Limit the time period that the critical root zone is covered by mulch, plywood, steel plates or
similar materials, or by light soils, to protect the tree's critical root zone.
7. In addition to the above, the director may require the following:
a. If equipment is authorized to operate within the protected zone, the soil and critical root
zone of a tree must be covered with mulch to a depth of at least six inches or with plywood,
steel plates or similar material in order to protect roots and soil from damage caused by heavy
equipment.
b. Minimize root damage by hand -excavating a two -foot -deep trench, at edge of critical root
zone, to cleanly sever the roots of trees to be retained. Never rip or shred roots with heavy
equipment.
c. Corrective pruning performed on protected trees in order to avoid damage from machinery
or building activity.
d. Maintenance of trees throughout construction period by watering and fertilizing.
D. Grade.
1. The grade shall not be elevated or reduced within the critical root zone of trees to be
preserved without the director's authorization based on recommendations from a qualified
professional. The director may allow coverage of up to one-half of the area of the tree's critical
Greenforest ® Registered Consulting Arborist
Rick Cuevas
RE: Arborist Report for 648 Walnut Street, Edmonds WA
August 11, 2021
Page 7 of 11
root zone with light soils (no clay) to the minimum depth necessary to carry out grading or
landscaping plans, if it will not imperil the survival of the tree. Aeration devices may be required
to ensure the tree's survival.
2. If the grade adjacent to a preserved tree is raised such that it could slough or erode into the
tree's critical root zone, it shall be permanently stabilized to prevent soil erosion and
suffocation of the roots.
3. The applicant shall not install an impervious surface within the critical root zone of any tree
to be retained without the authorization of the director. The director may require specific
construction methods and/or use of aeration devices to ensure the tree's survival and to
minimize the potential for root -induced damage to the impervious surface.
4. To the greatest extent practical, utility trenches shall be located outside of the critical root
zone of trees to be retained. The director may require that utilities be tunneled under the roots
of trees to be retained if the director determines that trenching would significantly reduce the
chances of the tree's survival.
5. Trees and other vegetation to be retained shall be protected from erosion and
sedimentation. Clearing operations shall be conducted so as to expose the smallest practical
area of soil to erosion for the least possible time. To control erosion, it is encouraged that
shrubs, ground cover and stumps be maintained on the individual lots, where feasible.
6. The director may approve the use of alternative tree protection techniques if those
techniques provide an equal or greater degree of protection than the techniques listed in this
subsection.
E. Directional Felling. Directional felling of trees shall be used to avoid damage to trees
designated for retention.
LIMITATIONS AND USE OF THIS REPORT
This tree report establishes, via the most practical means available, the existing conditions
of the trees on the subject property. Ratings for health and structure, as well as any
recommendations are valid only through the development and construction process. This
report is based solely on what is readily visible and observable, without any invasive means.
There are several conditions that can affect a tree's condition that may be pre-existing and
unable to be ascertained with a visual -only analysis. No attempt was made to determine the
presence of hidden or concealed conditions which may contribute to the risk or failure
potential of trees on the site. These conditions include root and stem (trunk) rot, internal
cracks, structural defects or construction damage to roots, which may be hidden beneath the
soil. Additionally, construction and post -construction circumstances can cause a relatively rapid
deterioration of a tree's condition.
ATTACHMENTS:
Greenforest O Registered Consulting Arborist
Rick Cuevas
RE: Arborist Report for 648 Walnut Street, Edmonds WA
August 11, 2021
Page 8 of 11
1. Assumptions and Limiting Conditions
2. Certification of Performance
3. Tree Protection Detail
4. Significant Tree Inventory
5. Tree Retention Plan
ATTACHMENT NO. 1 -ASSUMPTIONS & LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. Afield examination of the site was made 8/10/2021. My observations and conclusions
are as of that date.
2. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been
verified insofar as possible; however, the consultant/arborist can neither guarantee nor
be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others.
3. 1 am not a qualified land surveyor. Reasonable care was used to match the trees
indicated on the sheets with those growing in the field.
4. The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by
reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made.
Greenforest O Registered Consulting Arborist
Rick Cuevas
RE: Arborist Report for 648 Walnut Street, Edmonds WA
August 11, 2021
Page 9 of 11
ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - CERTIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE
I, Favero Greenforest, certify that:
• 1 have personally inspected the trees and the property referred to in this report and
have stated my findings accurately.
• 1 have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the
subject of this report and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties
involved.
• The analysis, opinion, and conclusions stated herein are my own and are based on
current scientific procedures and facts.
• My analysis, opinion, and conclusions were developed and this report has been
prepared according to commonly accepted arboricultural practices.
• No one provided significant professional assistance to me, except as indicated within
the report.
• My compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion
that favors the cause of the client of any other party nor upon the results of the
assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent
events.
I further certify that I am a member in good standing of International Society of Arboriculture
(ISA), and the ISA PNW Chapter, I am an ISA Certified Arborist (#PN-0143A) and am Tree Risk
Assessment Qualified, and am a Registered Consulting Arborist® (#379) with American Society
of Consulting Arborists. I have worked as an independent consulting arborist since 1989.
Signed:
IREENFOREST, In .
By Favero Greenforest, M. S-
Favero
Greenforest
Date: August 11, 2021
CERTIFIED11
ARBORIST
1�
ISA.
Digitally signed by Favero Greenforest
DN: cn=Favero Greenforest, o, ou,
email=greenforestinc@mindspring.co
m,c=US
Date: 2022.01.06 16:29:07-08'00'
Greenforest O Registered Consulting Arborist
TU
OOALIFICATIONS
TREE MSK ASSESUO r
Rick Cuevas
RE: Arborist Report for 648 Walnut Street, Edmonds WA
August 11, 2021
Page 10 of 11
Condition ratings T good to excellent, '2' fair, '3' poor
For offsite trees, driplines are reported as branch length overhanging the subject property as measured from an existing fence. DBH is estimated.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3— SIGN IFICANTTREE INVENTORY
(D
W
m
z
°
=
�'
Viable
Species
n
Comment on Condition
Tree
Decline, old age/poor vitality, asymmetric
1
13.5"
Moss cypress
14'
3
3
canopy, rootplate growth obstruction (existing
No
foundation)
2
22"
Leyland cypress
25'
1
1
Both tree leans SE as part of an unmanaged
Yes
hedgerow. Cannot be retained as stand-alone
3
18"
Leyland cypress
25'
1
1
trees.
Yes
4*
14"
Leyland cypress
20'
2
3
Tree leans SE, top dieback, tree is mostly dead
No
5*
18"
Leyland cypress
20'
2
3
Tree leans SE, top dieback, tree is mostly dead
No
*Offsite Trees
Greenforest O Registered Consulting Arborist
EQUIPMENT & PROCEDURES
VERTICAL DATUM
LEGEND
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
METHOD OF SURVEY.
SURVEY PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE
INSTRUMENTATION:
LEICA TS15 ROBOTIC ELECTRONIC TOTAL STATION
PRECISION.
MEETS OR EXCEEDS STATE STANDARDS WAC 332-130-090
BASIS OF BEARING:
THE MONUMENTED SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.,
AS THE BEARING OF N 88'4525" E.
00434209403700
I
FOUND CASED CONC. MON. W/ FOUND CASED CONC. MON. W/ N
3-1/2" BRASS DISK & PUNCH. 3-1/2" BRASS DISK & PUNCH.
DOWN 0.3'. VISITED 5-18-20. DOWN 0.3'. VISITED 5-18-20.
- - ----SS____. SS-----
N 88'4526" W 164.97(M) 165.00'(P)
i
r
I
I
I
15'
I
I
I
a�
�-I
I
o
0
:23 I
I
I
WI
I
I
I
of
I
z1
�
I
I I
I
I I
15
I I
I
I
I I
23 24
N 88'45'15" W 825.08' ----- I I
26 25 -_,L _ --�- -
I
FOUND CASED CONC. MON. W/
3-112" BRASS DISK & PUNCH.
DOWN 0.4'. VISITED 5-18-20.
NOTES
1.) THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF PARTIES
WHOSE NAMES APPEAR HEREON ONLY, AND DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY
UNNAMED THIRD PARTIES WITHOUT EXPRESS RECERTIFICATION BY THE LAND
SURVEYOR.
2.) BOUNDARY LINES SHOWN AND CORNERS SET REPRESENT DEED LOCATIONS;
OWNERSHIP LINES MAY VARY. NO GUARANTEE OF OWNERSHIP IS EXPRESSED OR
IMPLIED.
I
IL --------------
I
I
I
I
I
NAVD 88
FOUND CASED CONC. MON. W/
3-112" BRASS DISK & X"
WGS SURVEY DATA WAREHOUSE I.D.#17879
ELEV. = 79.22'
SURVEY REFERENCES
PLAT OF EDMONDS - VOL. 2, PG. 39
RECORD OF SURVEY - A.F.#200407295007
I
I
00434209403500
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------------------�-
--------- SS=
SSMH RIM=113.65
IE 8" RCP(N)=102.60
IE 8" RCP(E)=102.70
IE 6" RCP(W)=102.70
IE 6" RCP(SW)=102.70
---------------
LOT A
LOT B
27032500202900
• SET 1/2" X 24" REBAR W/CAP STAMPED PCS 37536"
O EXISTING REBAR W/CAP, AS NOTED
X SET NAIL AND WASHER STAMPED "PCS 37536"
X EXISTING NAIL AND WASHER AS NOTED
OFOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT AS NOTED
RIGHT OF WAY CENTERLINE
O CATCH BASIN
m WATER VALVE
® WATER METER
0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
o MAILBOX
-0- UTILITY/POWER POLE
CYPRESS TREE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
00434209403300 00434209403100
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------
CONCRETE CURB ffl
00434209402900
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---1------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARCEL A:
LOTS 13 AND 14, BLOCK 93, CITY OF EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2
OF PLATS, PAGE 39, RECORDS
OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL B:
LOTS 15 AND 16, BLOCK 93, CITY OF EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2
OF PLATS, PAGE 39, RECORDS
OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
PARCEL C:
BEGINNING AT A POINT 135.09 FEET WEST OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 27 NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST, W.M.;
THENCE SOUTH 30 FEET;
THENCE WEST 119.97 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 30 FEET;
THENCE EAST 119.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, WHICH LAND IS IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF TRACT B IN
BLOCK 93, CITY OF
EDMONDS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, PAGE 39, RECORDS OF
SNOHOMISH COUNTY,
WASHINGTON.
SITUATE IN THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
0043420940270E 00434209402400
I
I I
I ,
I I
I ,
I I
I ,
I I
I ,
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
00434209402300 I
00434209402100
I
I
I I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - j
CB RIM=111.07
CONCRETE CURB
IE 8" RCP(S)=109.82
12' 1�
ro
i
i
M
- - -
'WALNUT
ST. �
/
- - - - - - --SS-
224.87'
SS SS / N 88'45 26" W
-
494.72(M) 495.00'(P)
CB RIM=111.89 0----5
- - - - - -- SS-y-----------------1
SSSS-_-_----
IE 8" RCP(N)=110.64
; 269.85'
�h'7�2
SSMH RIM=119.68
b
IE 8" RCP(E)=104.33 , ; I
CONCRETE CURB
IE 8" RCP(W=104.23 ,
v"'i I IE 6" RCP(S)=104.33 I
CONCRETE WALK '----- ----
SD
SD
WOOD FENCE COR. 1.0'(N)
%
- - - - -
OF PROPERTY LINE
�� / �i i
CONCRETE CURB
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -�-----------�
_ '�
N 88'4526" W 119.90'
I
FOUND CASED CONC. MON. W/
3-112" BRASS DISK & PUNCH.
DOWN 0.3'. VISITED 5-18-20.
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
d-I
rnlN
I
w
I a
0
I
o
�1 z
I
FOUND CASED CONC. MON. W/
3-1/2" BRASS DISK & PUNCH.
DOWN 0.3'. VISITED 5-18-20.
SSMH RIM=140.52
Ir----------------------------------------
CB RIM=112.62 i 14"
IE 12" CPP(N)=109.12 i FOUND 112" IRON PIPE LL'z-uj C 14 C
IE 10" CPP(S)=109.22 :z 12",,
I 0.5'(W) & 0.3'(S) OF - i I
I IE 8" CPP(W=109.22 o I
( cn I CORNER. END FENCE ,' o oz i W I # 1 12 �� - -
IE 8" CPP E=109.22 I
0.5'(S) & 0.1 '(W) OF � �' 8 -' � i I v � � C
CORNER ------ x - 11 �i �I xW 5.1' �-
I 5.1 =►� �' i� A ; P
I
�� i 30' o
I l i /TITT/ ?l7T//T TT7T/Tr7TT� -
I I
I I ^
I
L I I
jl o HOUSE i N ry �' ; 4 '�i 00434209301700
W J640 CARPORT i HOUSE
/I o i i I 2 1
HOUSE �, i #
I 634 s W
I I # /� o �
00434209301100 z_ ��
SNO. CO. LOT C ? U L r PARCEL A 5.5''I I i z
--- SP S 95 180 i I--- 9, 00434209301300
A.F.#9604020521 __ 22 r �� II I
c----------------------------------------------------------------�
4.8'I 10» r 120- - � / 11 . #2 7.7' i
DEAD 14"1 % 1130�
END WOOD FENCE 0.3'(W) 64 - _ _ #412 + '
OF PROPERTY LINE I C #3
8C c + ' PARCEL a
#5 " C I
END CHAIN LINK FENCE %� C DEAD i 00434209301500
' '( 0.3W) OF PROPERTY LINE 8"
I , W
" C W I 126 i I
I I 8 �i
1
'. I I 30'
224.66' i 8 C of ' I 00434209301701
i I II
IE 8" RCP(W)_ 133.57
IE 8" RCP(E)=133.67
IE 8" RCP(S)=133.67
--------------------1- --- 148.34'
2.7'- 0t,(2
10" L1 I 1292.67' 24
�/r �- PARCEL C o N 88'4525" W 2612.01'(M) (BASIS OF BEARING) I�
C
rTl "' m x 27032500202600 0 -
SHED / Imo," m i NE COR. OF THE I 25
NW 1 14 OF THE
12 i FOUND CASED CONC. MON. W 2"
12" �o N NW 1 4 SEC 25,
1 FOUND REBAR W/CAP STAMPED n C N CONCRETE `I I DOMED BRASS DISK & 'X':
o 12" 14" 0.6' 12" , - C �' T27N, R3E, WM
TRI COUNTY 14490" 0.2' N & `" I DOWN 0.3'. VISITED 5-13-20
--------L------------------ I 1.1 '(W) OF CORNER. FENCE)'- z C C x 14" C A 7 o
T-----------------------------------
1.3'(W) AT CORNER---------
1 ---------- ---------- --------------------
I r�---- --X x �__ ---126---'-5 N 88'45'25" W 120.00'-----128 , -------------------T-----------------------------
WOOD FENCE - - i - / 130 - - I I----------
132
i
27032500203100 - -140-
-
! ! 27032500222300 ! 27032500222200
LINE TABLE
LINE
LENGTH
BEARING
L 1
1.47'
N 88'4525" W
12
1.27'
N 88'4525" W
2 / 0 32 5 0 0 2 0 33 0 0
SCALE. 1 " = 20'
MOM
0 20 40
4¢�1� J. R\
�F WA
F� O
2:4
o 37536
\~� �G I S T Eg,4+
GNAL LhIp /
w