The URL can be used to link to this page

Ordinance 43711 ORDINANCE NO. 4371 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, UPDATING THE CITY’S PERMIT PROCESSING TIMELINES AND PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH SB 5290 AND HB 1105. WHEREAS, in 2023, the Washington State Legislature enacted Senate Bill 5290, updating portions of the Local Project Review Act, Chapter 36.70B RCW; and WHEREAS, the intent of SB 5290 was to consolidate, streamline, and improve project review and permitting, with an emphasis on housing development, and to reduce the amount of time it takes for projects complying with local development regulations to receive approval; and WHEREAS, in 2024, the Washington State Legislature enacted House Bill 1105, requiring public agencies to enhance the contents notices for public comment; and WHEREAS, the planning board held a public hearing on August 28, 2024; and WHEREAS, the planning board recommendation was slightly different than the staff recommendation with regard to whether refund language should be included in the code; and WHEREAS, this item was introduced to city council on September 24, 2023; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held the same evening, but no public comments were received; and WHEREAS, Council selected the planning board recommendation on October 29; and WHEREAS, these code changes are solely procedural; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 20.01 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMITS,” is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strikethrough). 2 Section 2. Chapter 20.02 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS,” is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strikethrough). Section 3. Chapter 20.03 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS,” is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strikethrough). Section 4. Section 20.12.005 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “Outline of process and statement of intent,” is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strikethrough). Section 5. Section 20.75.065 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “Preliminary review,” is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strikethrough). Section 6. Section 20.75.070 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “Formal subdivision – Time limit,” is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strikethrough). Section 7. Section 21.80.095 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled “Project permit or project permit application,” is hereby amended to read as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strikethrough). Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an administrative function of the city council, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. ATTEST/A UTH ENT ICATED: ~ASSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: BY ~ JEFF TARADAY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DA TE: ORDINANCE NO. APPROVED: MAY~ October 31, 2024 November 4, 2024 November 8, 2024 November 13, 2024 4371 3 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4371 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 4th day of November, 2024, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 4371. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, UPDATING THE CITY'S PERMIT PROCESSING TIMELINES AND PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH SB 5290 AND HB 1105. The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 4th day ofNovember, 2024 . C 4 EXHIBIT A 1 Chapter 20.01 TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMITS Sections: 20.01.000 Purpose and general provisions. 20.01.001 Types of actions. 20.01.002 Determination of proper procedure type. 20.01.003 Permit type and decision framework. 20.01.006 Legislative enactments not restricted. 20.01.007 Exempt projects. 20.01.000 Purpose and general provisions. A. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standard procedures, decision criteria, public notification, and timing for development project permit application decisions made by the city of Edmonds. These procedures are intended to: 1. Promote timely and informed public participation; 2. Eliminate redundancy in the application, permit review, and appeals processes; 3. Process permits equitably and expediently; 4. Balance the needs of permit applicants with neighbors; 5. Ensure that decisions are made consistently and predictably; and 6. Result in development that furthers city goals as set forth in the comprehensive plan. These procedures provide for an integrated and consolidated land use permit process. The procedures integrate the environmental review process with land use procedures, decisions, and consolidated appeal processes. B. The provisions of this title supersede all other procedural requirements that may exist in other sections of the city code. When interpreting and applying the standards of this title, its provisions shall be the minimum requirements. Where conflicts occur within provisions of this EXHIBIT A 2 title and/or between this title and other city code provisions and regulations, the more restrictive provisions shall apply. Where conflict between the text of this title and the zoning map ensue, the text of this title shall prevail. C. Unless otherwise specified, all references to days shall be calendar days. Whenever the last day of a deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday designated by RCW 1.16.050 or by a city ordinance, or any day when City Hall or the city’s planning and development department is closed to the public by formal executive or legislative action, the deadline shall run until the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday or closed day. [Ord. 4299 § 37 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4154 § 1 (Att. A), 2019; Ord. 3817 § 1, 2010]. 20.01.001 Types of actions. There are five main types of actions (or permits) that are reviewed under the provisions of this chapter. The types of actions are based on who makes the decision, the amount of discretion exercised by the decision-making body, the level of impact associated with the decision, the amount and type of public input sought, and the type of appeal opportunity. A. Administrative Decisions. Type I and II decisions are administrative decisions made by the planning and development director or his/her designee (hereinafter the “director”). Type I permits are ministerial decisions and are based on compliance with specific, nondiscretionary and/or technical standards that are clearly enumerated. Type II permits are administrative decisions where the director makes a decision based on standards and clearly identified criteria, but where public notice is required. Unless otherwise provided, appeals of Type II decisions shall be initiated as set forth in ECDC 20.06.030. B. Quasi-Judicial Decisions. Type III, Type IV and appeal of Type II decisions are quasi-judicial decisions that involve the use of discretionary judgment in the review of each specific application. Quasi-judicial decisions are made by the hearing examiner, the architectural design board, and/or the city council. C. Legislative Decisions. Type V actions are legislative decisions made by the city council under its authority to establish policies and regulations regarding future private and public developments, and management of public lands. 1. Planning Board. The planning board shall hold a public hearing and make recommendations to the city council on Type V actions, except that the city council may EXHIBIT A 3 hold a public hearing itself on area-wide rezones to implement city policies, or amendments to zoning code text, development regulations or the zoning map. The public hearing shall be held in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 20.06 ECDC, RCW 36.70A.035 and all other applicable law. 2. City Council. The city council may consider the planning board’s recommendation in a public hearing held in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 20.06 ECDC and RCW 36.70A.035 and all other applicable law. If the city council desires to hold a public hearing on area-wide rezones to implement city policies, or amendments to zoning code text, development regulations or the zoning map, it may do so without forwarding the proposed decision to the planning board for a hearing. 3. Public Notice. Notice of the public hearing or public meeting shall be provided to the public as set forth in Chapter 20.03 ECDC. 4. Implementation. City council Type V decision shall be by ordinance or resolution and shall become effective on the effective date of the ordinance or resolution. [Ord. 4299 § 38 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4154 § 1 (Att. A), 2019; Ord. 3817 § 1, 2010]. 20.01.002 Determination of proper procedure type. A. Determination by Director. The director shall determine the proper procedure for all project applications. Questions concerning the appropriate procedure shall be resolved in favor of the higher numbered procedure. B. Optional Consolidated Permit Processing. An application that involves two or more procedures may be processed collectively under the highest numbered procedure required for any part of the application or may be processed individually under each of the application procedures identified in ECDC 20.01.003. The applicant may determine whether the application will be processed collectively or individually. If the applications are processed individually, the highest numbered type procedure shall be undertaken first, followed by the other procedures in sequence from the highest numbered to the lowest. When Type III-A and Type III-B permits are consolidated under this subsection, the project shall proceed under the Type III-A permit process. When two or more permits are consolidated under this subsection, the permit timelines for decisions on individual permits in ECDC 20.01.003(B) do not apply. C. Decisionmaker(s). Applications processed in accordance with subsection (B) of this section which have the same procedure number, but are assigned to different hearing bodies, shall be EXHIBIT A 4 heard collectively by the highest decisionmaker; the city council being the highest body, followed by the hearing examiner, architectural design board or planning board, as applicable, and then the director. Joint public hearings with other agencies shall be processed according to ECDC 20.06.010. Concurrent public hearings held with the architectural design board and any other decisionmaker shall proceed with both decisionmakers present. [Ord. 4154 § 1 (Att. A), 2019; Ord. 3817 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009]. 20.01.003 Permit type and decision framework. A. Permit Types. TYPE I TYPE II-A TYPE II-B TYPE III-A TYPE III-B TYPE IV TYPE V Zoning compliance letter Contingent critical area review Essential public facilities Site specific rezone Lot line adjustment Formal interpretation of the text of the ECDC by the director Shoreline substantial development permit, where public hearing not required per ECDC 24.80.100 Technological impracticality waiver for amateur radio antennas Development agreements Zoning text amendment; area-wide zoning map amendments Critical area determinations SEPA determinations Critical area variance Comprehensive plan amendments Shoreline exemptions Preliminary short plat Contingent critical area review if public Conditional use permits (where public hearing by hearing Annexations EXHIBIT A 5 TYPE I TYPE II-A TYPE II-B TYPE III-A TYPE III-B TYPE IV TYPE V hearing requested examiner is required) Minor amendments to planned residential development Land clearing/grading Shoreline substantial development permit, where public hearing is required per ECDC 24.80.100 Variances Development regulations Minor preliminary plat amendment Revisions to shoreline management permits Shoreline conditional use Staff design review, including signs Administrative variances Shoreline variance Final short plat Land use permit extension requests Design review (where public hearing by architectural design board is required) Sales office/model (ECDC 17.70.005) Preliminary formal plat Final formal plats Innocent purchaser determination Preliminary planned EXHIBIT A 6 TYPE I TYPE II-A TYPE II-B TYPE III-A TYPE III-B TYPE IV TYPE V residential development Final planned residential development Staff design review pursuant to ECDC 20.12.010(B)(2) B. Decision Table. PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS (TYPE I – IV) LEGISLATIVE TYPE I TYPE II-A TYPE II-B TYPE III-A TYPE III- B TYPE IV TYPE V Recommendation by: N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Planning board Planning board Final decision by: Director Director Director Hearing examiner/ADB Hearing examiner City council City council Notice of application: No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Open record public hearing or open record appeal of a final decision: No Only if appealed, open record hearing before hearing examiner (1) If director decision is appealed, open record hearing before Yes, before hearing examiner or board to render final decision Yes, before hearing examiner or board to render final decision Yes, before planning board which makes recommendation to council Yes, before planning board which makes recommendation to council or council could hold its own hearing ; // ~ ! / ~\\ \, : ·~ ( --..... \ (/ ··,,, ....... •••· ... · .. \\ ... ,-·. / ,~ --....,_,_ ""-...... ..,_ .. .. I, \ 1· . ""-~ /,,/ EXHIBIT A 7 PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS (TYPE I – IV) LEGISLATIVE TYPE I TYPE II-A TYPE II-B TYPE III-A TYPE III- B TYPE IV TYPE V hearing examiner (2) If converted to Type III-A process Closed record review: No No No No Yes, before the council Yes, before the council Permit review timelines (per ECDC 20.02): 65 days 100 days 100 days 170 days 170 days 170 days Not applicable Judicial appeal: Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes C. Any reference to “Type II” in the Edmonds Community Development Code without expressly being modified as “Type II-B” shall be construed to mean Type II-A for the purposes of this section unless the context clearly suggests otherwise. [Ord. 4360 § 7 (Exh. A), 2024; Ord. 4302 § 2 (Att. A), 2023; Ord. 4299 § 39 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4154 § 1 (Att. A), 2019; Ord. 4072 § 7 (Att. G), 2017; Ord. 4026 § 4, 2016; Ord. 3982 § 4, 2014; Ord. 3817 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3806 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009]. 20.01.006 Legislative enactments not restricted. Nothing in this chapter or the permit processing procedures shall limit the authority of the city council to make changes to the city’s comprehensive plan or the city’s development regulations / '-... \. "' I~ \...__ •••••· ..... ~ "'"' ) ' ~······ ••.......... I\ ·~ -- \ ·,.,_ / ( /./ ~ \! ', '.... -"" \ • "' •••••• ........ .... i EXHIBIT A 8 as part of the annual revision process. [Ord. 4154 § 1 (Att. A), 2019; Ord. 3817 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009]. 20.01.007 Exempt projects. A. The following projects are specifically excluded from the procedures set forth in this chapter: historic register designations, building permits, street vacations, street use permits, encroachment permits, and other public works permits issued under ECDC Title 18. B. Pursuant to RCW 36.70B.140(2), lot line or boundary adjustments, building and/or other construction permits, or similar administrative approvals categorically exempt from environmental review under SEPA (Chapter 43.21C RCW and the city’s SEPA/environmental policy ordinance, Chapter 20.15A ECDC), or permits/approvals for which environmental review has been completed in connection with other project permits, are excluded from the requirements of RCW 36.70B.060 and 36.70B.110 through 36.70B.130, which includes the following procedures: 1. Notice of application (ECDC 20.03.002) unless an open record hearing is allowed on the permit decision; 2. Except as provided in RCW 36.70B.140, optional consolidated permit review processing (ECDC 20.01.002(B)); 3. Joint public hearings (ECDC 20.06.010); 4. Single report stating all of the decisions and recommendations made as of the date of the report that do not require an open public record hearing (ECDC 20.06.050(C)); and 5. Notice of decision (ECDC 20.02.007). [Ord. 4154 § 1 (Att. A), 2019; Ord. 3817 § 1, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009]. EXHIBIT A 9 Chapter 20.02 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS Sections: 20.02.001 Optional preapplication conference. 20.02.002 Permit application requirements. 20.02.003 Submission and acceptance of applicationComplete and incomplete applications, requesting additional information. 20.02.004 Effect of irreconcilable applications on the same property. 20.02.005 Referral and review of development project permit applications. 20.02.006 Resubmission of application after denial. 20.02.007 Notice of final decision. 20.02.008 Permit review timelines. 20.02.001 Optional preapplication conference. A. Prior to filing applications for Type II actions requiring a preliminary plat and Type III and IV actions, applicants are encouraged to participate in a preapplication conference. Preapplication meetings with staff provide an opportunity to discuss the proposal in general terms, identify the applicable city requirements and the project review process including the permits required by the action, timing of the permits and the approval process. Plans presented at the preapplication meeting are nonbinding and do not “vest” an application. B. The conference shall be held within 28 days of the request, upon payment of applicable fee(s) as set forth in the city’s adopted fee resolution. C. The planning and development director or his/her designee (hereinafter the “director”) shall provide the applicant with the following during the conference: EXHIBIT A 10 1. A form which lists the requirements for a completed application; 2. A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; 3. The references to the relevant code provisions or development standards which may apply to approval of the application; and 4. The city’s design guidelines. D. Neither the discussions at the conference nor the information on the form provided by the director to the applicant under subsection (C) of this section shall bind the city in any manner or prevent the city’s future application or enforcement of all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations. E. Requests for preapplication conferences for all other types of applications will be considered on a time-available basis by the director. [Ord. 4299 § 40 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 3817 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009]. 20.02.002 Permit application requirements. An application shall consist of all materials required by the applicable development regulations and shall include the following general information: A. A completed land use application form; B. A verified statement by the applicant that the property affected by the application is in the exclusive ownership of the applicant, or that the applicant has submitted the application with the consent of all owners of the affected property; C. A property and/or legal description of the site for all applications, as required by the applicable development regulations; D. The applicable fee; and E. Cover letter describing how the proposal satisfies the applicable standards, requirements and criteria in the development regulations. [Ord. 3817 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009]. EXHIBIT A 11 20.02.003 Submission and acceptance of applicationComplete and incomplete applications, requesting additional information. A. Determination of Completeness. Within 28 days after receiving an application, the director must shall mail or personally deliver to the applicant a determination which states that either: provide a written determination to the applicant stating that:. The written determination must state either: 1. The application is complete; or 2. The application is incomplete and because that the procedural submission requirements have not been met. The determination shall outlinemust specifically describe what information is needed what is necessary to make the application complete. When an application is determined to be complete, the director will note the date of acceptance for continued processing. B. Identification of Other Agencies with Jurisdiction. To the extent known by the city, other agencies with jurisdiction over the project shall be identified in the determination of completeness. C. Failure to Provide Determination of Completeness. An application is deemed procedurally complete on the 29th day after receiving a project permit application under this section if the director does not provide a written determination to the applicant that the application is incomplete as provided in subsection (A)(2) of this section. C. Additional Information. An application is complete for the purposes of this section when it meets the submission requirements of ECDC 20.02.002 and the submission requirements of the applicable development regulations. The determination of completeness shall be made when the application is sufficiently complete for review, even though additional information may be required or project modifications may be undertaken subsequently. The determination of completeness shall not preclude the director’s ability to request additional information or studies whenever new information is required, or when substantial changes are made to the proposed project. D. Incomplete Applications. EXHIBIT A 12 1. Whenever the applicant receives a determination from the city pursuant to subsection (A)(2) of this section that the application is incomplete, the applicant shall have 90 days to submit the necessary requested information. If circumstances warrant, the applicant may apply in writing to the director requesting a one-time 90-day extension. The extension request must be received by the city prior to the end of the initial 90-day period.Within 14 days after an applicant has submitted the requested additional information, the director shall make a determination of completeness and notify the applicant in the manner provided in subsection (A) of this section. 2. Within 14 days after an applicant has submitted the requested additional information, the director must make a determination of completeness and notify the applicant in the manner provided in subsection (A) of this section.Whenever the applicant receives a notice that the contents of the application, which had been previously determined under subsection (A)(1) of this section to be complete, is insufficient, ambiguous, undecipherable, or otherwise unresponsive of the information being sought, the applicant shall have 90 days to submit the necessary information. If circumstances warrant, the applicant may apply in writing to the director requesting a one-time 90-day extension. The extension request must be received by the city prior to the end of the initial 90-day compliance period. 3. If the applicant does not submit the additional information requested within the 90-day period (or within the 90-day extension period, as applicable), the director shall make findings and issue a decision, according to the Type I procedure, that the application has lapsed for lack of information necessary to complete the review. The decision shall state that no further action will be taken on the application. 4. When the director determines that an application has lapsed because the applicant has failed to submit required information within the necessary time period, the applicant may request a refund of the application fee remaining after the city’s determination of completeness. E. Requesting Additional Information. The determination of completeness does not preclude the director’s ability to request additional information or ask for corrections to submitted materials whenever additional or updated information is required, or when substantial changes are made to the proposed project. EXHIBIT A 13 1. Whenever the applicant receives a notice that the contents of the application, which had been previously determined to be complete under subsection (A)(1) of this section, is insufficient, ambiguous, undecipherable, or otherwise unresponsive of the information being sought, the applicant has 90 days to submit the requested information. If circumstances warrant, the applicant may apply in writing to the director requesting a one- time 90-day extension. The extension request must be received by the city prior to the end of the initial 90-day period. 2. If the applicant does not submit the additional information requested within the 90-day period (or within the 90-day extension period, as applicable), the director must make findings and issue a decision, according to the Type I procedure, that the application has lapsed for lack of information necessary to complete the review. The decision must state that no further action will be taken on the application. 3. When the director determines that an application has lapsed because the applicant has failed to submit required information within the necessary time period, the applicant may request a refund of the application fee remaining after the city’s determination of completeness. E. Director’s Failure to Provide Determination of Completeness. An application shall be deemed complete under this section if the director does not provide a written determination to the applicant that the application is incomplete as provided in subsection (A) of this section. F. Date of Acceptance of Application. Permit applications shall not be officially accepted until complete. When an application is determined to be complete, the director shall note the date of acceptance for continued processing. GF. City Duty to Review. After the application is determined to be complete or additional materials are accepted following a request for additional information, acceptance, the city must shall begin or resume processing the application. Under no circumstances shall the city place any application on “hold” to be processed at some later date, even if the request for the “hold” is made by the applicant, and regardless of the requested length of the “holding” period. This subsection does not apply to applications placed on “hold” upon determination by the city that EXHIBIT A 14 additional information is required in order to make a decision. [Ord. 4299 § 41 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 3817 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009]. G. Applicant may Suspend Review. If at any time an applicant informs the city, in writing, that the applicant would like to temporarily suspend the review of the project for more than 60 days, or if an applicant is not responsive for more than 60 consecutive days after the city has notified the applicant, in writing, that additional information is required to further process the application, an additional 30 days will be added to the time periods for city action to issue a final decision for the permit. In addition, the city may set conditions for the temporary suspension of a permit application. 20.02.004 Effect of irreconcilable applications on the same property. A. If an applicant submits an application that cannot be reconciled with a previously submitted application on the same property, the previously submitted application shall be deemed withdrawn by the applicant and it shall be rendered null and void. The director shall notify the applicant that the previously submitted application has been deemed withdrawn and will not be processed any further. Withdrawal shall be deemed to occur even when the city has finished processing the previously submitted application. B. Many inconsistencies between applications can be reconciled through corrections that are made during the development review process. This section is not intended to treat all inconsistencies as effecting a withdrawal of the earlier application. C. Without limiting the generality of subsection (A) of this section, the following examples are intended to illustrate whether a subsequent application shall be deemed irreconcilable with an earlier application: 1. Examples of Irreconcilable Applications That Result in Withdrawal. a. Applicant submits an application for a four-lot short plat on a particular property. Subsequently, another application is submitted for a three-lot short plat on the same property. Assuming there is not enough land area for seven lots, the two applications are irreconcilable because one could not construct both short plats. Hence, the four-lot short plat is deemed withdrawn. EXHIBIT A 15 b. Applicant submits a design review application for a 20-unit multifamily housing development. Subsequently, another design review application is submitted for a 30- unit multifamily housing development whose footprint would substantially overlap with the footprint of the structure shown for the 20-unit application. Because both structures would occupy substantially the same space they are irreconcilable and the 20-unit application would be deemed withdrawn. 2. Examples of Applications That May Be Inconsistent but Are Not Irreconcilable Resulting in Withdrawal. a. Applicant submits an application for a four-lot short plat on a particular property. Subsequently, a building permit application is submitted for a single-family home the footprint of which would encroach into the setbacks as measured from the proposed short plat lot lines. Because the building permit application could be corrected to properly locate the footprint, the applications are reconcilable and do not effect a withdrawal of the short plat application. b. Applicant submits a landscaping plan that is inconsistent in an insignificant way with civil site-improvement plans that are submitted for the same property. If the two sets of plans can be reconciled by submitting a corrected version of at least one of the two plans, then city staff would seek corrections and withdrawal would not be deemed to occur. [Ord. 4006 § 1, 2015]. 20.02.005 Referral and review of development project permit applications. Within 10 days of accepting an application, the director shall transmit a copy of the application, or appropriate parts of the application, to each affected government agency and city department for review and comment, including those responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements. [Ord. 3817 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009]. 20.02.006 Resubmission of application after denial. Any permit application or other request for approval submitted pursuant to this title that is denied shall not be resubmitted or accepted by the director for review for a period of 12 EXHIBIT A 16 months from the date of the last action by the city on the application or request unless, in the opinion of the director, there has been a significant change in the application or a significant change in conditions related to the impacts of the proposed project. [Ord. 4006 § 2, 2015; Ord. 3817 § 6, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009. Formerly 20.07.007]. 20.02.007 Notice of final decision. A. The director shall must issue a notice of final decision within consistent with 120 days of the issuance of the determination of completeness pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003; provided, that the time period for issuance of a notice of final decision on a preliminary plat shall be 90 days, for a final plat 30 days, and a final short plat 30 daysthe timelines found in the Decision Table in ECDC 20.01.003(B). The notice shall include the SEPA threshold determination for the proposal and a description of any available administrative appeals. For Type II, III and IV permits, the notice shall contain the requirements set forth in ECDC 20.06.060(C) and explain that affected property owners may request a change in property tax valuation notwithstanding any program of revaluation. B. 1. The notice of final decision shall be mailed or otherwise delivered to the applicant, and to any person who submitted comments on the application or requested a copy of the decision, and to the Snohomish County assessor. 2. Notice of the decision shall be provided to the public by any means deemed reasonable by the director. B. In calculating the 120-day period for issuance of the notice of final decision, or other decision period specified in subsection (A) of this section, the following periods shall be excluded: 1. Any period during which the applicant has been requested by the director to correct plans, perform required studies, or provide additional required information. The period shall be calculated from the date the director notifies the applicant of the need for additional information until the earlier of the dates the director determines that the additional information provided satisfies the request for information, or 14 days after the date the additional information is provided to the city; EXHIBIT A 17 2. If the director determines that the information submitted is insufficient, the applicant shall be informed of the deficiencies and the procedures set forth in subsection (B)(1) of this section for calculating the exclusion period shall apply; 3. Any period during which an environmental impact statement (EIS) is being prepared pursuant to Chapter 43.21C RCW and Chapter 20.15A ECDC. The time period for preparation of an EIS shall be governed by Chapter 20.15A ECDC; 4. Any period for consideration and issuance of a decision for administrative appeals of development project permits, which shall be not more than 90 days for open record appeals and 60 days for closed record appeals, unless a longer period is agreed to by the director and the applicant; 5. Any extension of time mutually agreed to by the director and the applicant in writing. C. The time limits established in this title do not apply if a permit application: 1. Requires an amendment to the comprehensive plan or a development regulation; 2. Requires siting approval of an essential public facility as provided in RCW 36.70A.200; 3. Is a Type IV permit process identified in ECDC 20.01.003(A); or 4. Is substantially revised by the applicant, in which case the time period shall start from the date that a determination of completeness for the revised application is issued by the director pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003 and RCW 36.70B.070. [Ord. 4154 § 10 (Att. D), 2019]. 20.02.008 Permit review timelines. A. Required Timelines. Permit review timelines are shown in the Decision Table in ECDC 20.01.003(B). The city’s review timelines restart if an applicant proposes a change in use that adds or removes commercial or residential elements from the original application that result in a failure to meet the determination of procedural completeness for the new use. B. Calculation of Days. The number of days an application is in review with the city is calculated from the day completeness is determined to the date a final decision is issued on the permit application, EXHIBIT A 18 consistent with ECDC 20.02.007. The number of days is calculated by counting every calendar day and excluding the following time period: 1. Any period between the day that the city has notified the applicant, in writing, that additional information is required to further process the application and the day when responsive information is resubmitted by the applicant; 2. Any period after an applicant informs the city, in writing, that they would like to temporarily suspend review of the permit application until the time that the applicant notifies the city, in writing, that they would like to resume the application; and 3. Any period after an administrative appeal is filed until the administrative appeal is resolved and any additional time period provided by the administrative appeal has expired. C. Annual Performance Report. Consistent with RCW 36.70B.080, the City must prepare an annual project permit performance report. Chapter 20.03 PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS Sections: 20.03.002 Notice of application. 20.03.003 Notice of public hearing. 20.03.004 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) notice. 20.03.005 Shoreline master program (SMP) notice. 20.03.006 Optional public notice. 20.03.002 Notice of application. A. Generally. A notice of application shall be provided by the director to the public, all city departments and agencies with jurisdiction of all Type II, III and IV development project permit applications in accordance with this chapter. The notice of application for these permits shall also be provided to the public by posting, publishing and mailing. EXHIBIT A 19 B. Issuance of Notice of Application. 1. A notice of application shall be issued within 14 days after the city has made a determination of completeness pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003. 2. If any open record predecision hearing is required for the requested development project permit(s), the notice of application shall be provided at least 15 days prior to the open record hearing. C. Contents. The notice of application shall include the following information in a format determined by the director: 1. The date of submission of the initial application, the date of the notice of completion and acceptance of the application, and the date of the notice of application; 2. A description of the proposed project and a list of the development project permits requested in the application and, if applicable, a list of any studies requested under Chapter 36.70B RCW; 3. A description of other required permits not included in the application, to the extent known by the city at that time; 4. A description of existing environmental documents that evaluate the proposed project, and, if not otherwise stated on the document providing notice of application, the location where the application and any studies can be reviewed; 5. A statement setting forth: (a) the time for the public comment period, which shall be not less than 14 days following the date of notice of application; (b) the right of any person to comment on the application, receive notice of and participate in any hearings, and request a copy of the decision on the application; and (c) any appeal rights; 6. The date, time, place and type of hearing, if a hearing has been scheduled when the date of notice of application is issued. For Type II-B processes, the notice shall provide information regarding the process for requesting a public hearing in accordance with the applicable Type II-B permit application; 7. Any other information determined appropriate by the director such as the director’s threshold determination, if complete at the time of issuance of the notice of application. EXHIBIT A 20 D. Mailed Notice. Notice of application shall be mailed to: 1. The owners of the property involved if different from applicant; and 2. The owners of real property within 300 feet of the boundaries of the property(ies) involved in the application (the distance is extended to 500 feet for Type II-A design review applications in the general commercial zone). Addresses for a mailed notice required by this code shall be obtained from the applicable county’s real property tax records. The adjacent property owners list must be current to within six months of the date of initial application. 3. Type III Preliminary Plat Actions. In addition to the above, requirements for mailed notice of filing for preliminary plats and proposed subdivisions shall also include the following: a. Notice of the filing of a preliminary plat adjacent to or within one mile of the municipal boundaries of any city or town, or which contemplates the use of any city or town utilities, shall be given to the appropriate city or town authorities; b. Notice of the filing of a preliminary plat of a proposed subdivision adjoining the boundaries of Snohomish County shall be given to the appropriate county officials; c. Notice of the filing of a preliminary plat of a proposed subdivision located adjacent to the right-of-way of a state highway shall be given to the Secretary of Transportation; 4. For a plat alteration or a plat vacation, notice shall be as provided in RCW 58.17.080 and 58.17.090. All mailed public notices shall be deemed to have been received on the next business day following the day that the notice is deposited in the mail. E. Published Notice. Notice of application shall be published in the city’s official newspaper (The Everett Herald, as identified in Chapter 1.03 ECC). The format shall be determined by the director and the notice must contain the information listed in subsection (C) of this section. F. Posting. Posting of the property for site specific proposals shall consist of one or more notice boards as follows: 1. A single notice board shall be placed: EXHIBIT A 21 a. At the midpoint of the street fronting the site or as otherwise directed by the director for maximum visibility; b. Five feet inside the street property line, except when the board is structurally attached to an existing building; provided, that no notice board shall be placed more than five feet from the street without approval of the director; c. So that the bottom of the notice board is between two and four feet above grade; and d. Where it is completely visible to pedestrians. e. The size of the notice board shall be determined by the director. 2. Additional notice boards may be required when: a. The site does not abut a public road; b. A large site abuts more than one public road; or c. The director determines that additional notice boards are necessary to provide adequate public notice. 3. Notice boards shall be: a. Maintained in good condition during the notice period; b. In place at least 14 days prior to the date of any hearing, and at least 14 days prior to the end of any required comment period; c. Removed within 30 days of the date of the project decision, unless the decision is appealed. If the project decision is appealed, the sign must be removed 30 days after the appeal decision is issued. 4. Removal of the notice board prior to the end of the notice period shall be cause for discontinuance of the department review until the notice board is replaced and remains in place for the specified time period. G. Public Comment on the Notice of Application. All public comments in response to the notice of application must be received by the city’s planning and development department between the day the notice is issued and 11:59 p.m. by 4:30 p.m. on the last day of the comment period. EXHIBIT A 22 Comments in response to the notice of application received after the comment period has expired will not be accepted no matter when they were mailed or postmarked. Comments shall be mailed, emailed or personally delivered. Comments should be as specific as possible. [Ord. 4302 § 3 (Att. A), 2023; Ord. 4299 § 42 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4026 § 5, 2016; Ord. 4021 § 1, 2016; Ord. 3817 § 3, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009]. 20.03.003 Notice of public hearing. A. A notice of public hearing shall be provided by the city for Type III or Type IV actions, as well as appeals of Type II actions, by mailing, posting and publishing. B. Content of Notice of Public Hearing for All Applications. The notice of a public hearing required by this chapter shall contain: 1. The name and address of the applicant and the applicant’s representative; 2. A description of the subject property reasonably sufficient to inform the public of its location, including but not limited to a vicinity location or written description, a map or postal address, and a subdivision lot and block designation (complete legal description not required); 3. The date, time and place of the hearing; 4. The nature of the proposed use or development; 5. A statement that all interested persons may appear and provide testimony; 6. The sections of the code that are pertinent to the hearing procedure; 7. A statement explaining when information may be examined, and when and how written comments addressing findings required for a decision by the hearing body may be admitted; 8. The name of a city representative to contact and the telephone number where additional information may be obtained; 9. A statement that a copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant, and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and that copies will be provided at the requestor’s cost; and EXHIBIT A 23 10. A statement explaining that a copy of the staff report will be available for inspection at no cost at least seven days prior to the hearing and that copies will be provided at the requestor’s cost. C. Mailed Notice. Mailed notice of the public hearing shall be provided as follows: 1. The notice of the public hearing shall be mailed to: a. The applicant; b. The owner of the subject property, if different from applicant; c. All owners of real property, as shown by the records of the county assessor, within 300 feet of the boundaries of the property(ies) involved in the application; and d. Any person who submits public comments on an application; 2. Type III Preliminary Plat Actions. In addition to the above, requirements for mailed notice of public hearing for preliminary plats and proposed subdivisions shall also include the following: a. If the owner of the real property which is proposed to be subdivided owns another parcel or parcels of real property which lie adjacent to the real property proposed to be subdivided, notice under RCW 58.17.090(1)(b) shall be given to owners of real property located with 300 feet from any portion of the boundaries of the adjacent parcels owned by the owner of the real property to be subdivided. 3. For a plat alteration or a plat vacation, notice shall be as provided in RCW 58.17.080 and 58.17.090. 4. Procedure for Mailed Notice of Public Hearing. a. The records of the Snohomish County assessor’s office shall be used for determining the property owner of record. Addresses for a mailed notice required by this code shall be obtained from the applicable county’s real property tax records. b. All mailed public notices shall be deemed to have been received on the next business day following the day that the notice is deposited in the mail. D. Procedure for Posted or Published Notice of Public Hearing. EXHIBIT A 24 1. Posted notice of the public hearing shall comply with requirements set forth in ECDC 20.03.002(F). 2. Notice of public hearing shall be published in the city’s official newspaper (The Everett Herald, as identified in Chapter 1.03 ECC). The format shall be determined by the director and the notice must contain the information listed in subsection (B) of this section. E. Time of Notice of Public Hearing. Notice shall be mailed, posted and first published not less than 14 or more than 30 days prior to the hearing date. [Ord. 3817 § 3, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009. Formerly 20.03.004]. F. Public Comment on the Notice of Public Hearing. All public comments in response to the notice of public hearing must be received by the city’s planning and development department between the day the notice is issued and the close of the public hearing. 20.03.004 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) notice. A. Whenever possible, the city shall integrate the public notice required under this subsection with existing notice procedures for the city’s nonexempt permit(s) or approval(s) required for the proposal. B. Whenever the city issues a determination of nonsignificance (DNS) under WAC 197-11- 340(2) or a determination of significance (DS) under WAC 197-11-360(3) the city shall give public notice as follows: 1. If public notice is required for a nonexempt license, the notice shall state whether a DS or DNS has been issued and when comments are due. 2. If an environmental document is issued concurrently with the notice of application, the public notice requirements for the notice of application in RCW 36.70B.110(4) will suffice to meet the SEPA public notice requirements in WAC 197-11-510(1). 3. If no public notice is otherwise required for the permit or approval, the city shall give notice of the DNS or DS by: a. Posting the property, for site specific proposals; b. Mailed to real property owners as shown by the records of the county assessor within 300 feet of the boundary of the property, for site specific proposals; and EXHIBIT A 25 c. Publishing notice in the city’s official newspaper (or if one has not been designated, in a newspaper of general circulation within the city). 4. Whenever the city issues a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3), the city shall state the scoping procedure for the proposal in the DS as required in WAC 197-11-408 and in the public notice. C. If a DNS is issued using the optional DNS process, the public notice requirements for a notice of application in RCW 36.70B.110(4) as supplemented by the requirements in WAC 197- 11-355 will suffice to meet the SEPA public notice requirements in WAC 197-11-510(1)(b). D. Whenever the city issues a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) under WAC 197-11- 455(5) or a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) under WAC 197-11-620, notice of the availability of those documents shall be given by: 1. Indicating the availability of the DEIS in any public notice required for a nonexempt license; 2. Posting the property, for site specific proposals; 3. Mailed to real property owners as shown by the records of the county assessor within 300 feet of the boundary of the property, for site specific proposals; and 4. Publishing notice in the city’s official newspaper (or if one has not been designated, in a newspaper of general circulation within the city). E. Public notice for projects that qualify as planned actions shall be tied to underlying permit; the notice shall state that the project has qualified as a planned action. If notice is not otherwise required for the underlying permit, no special notice is required. F. Public Comment. All public comments in response to the notice of a comment period must be received by the city’s planning and development department between the day the notice is issued and 11:59 p.m. on the last day of the comment period. The city may require an applicant to complete the public notice requirements for the applicant’s proposal at his or her expense. [Ord. 3818 § 2, 2010; Ord. 3817 § 3, 2010]. EXHIBIT A 26 20.03.005 Shoreline master program (SMP) notice. A. Methods of Providing SMP Notice. Notice of the application of a permit under the purview of the city’s shoreline master program shall be given by one or more of the following methods: 1. Mailing of the notice to real property owners as shown by the records of the county assessor within 300 feet of the boundary of the property upon which the proposed project is to be built; 2. Posting of the notice in a conspicuous manner, as determined by the director, on the property upon which the project is to be constructed; or 3. Any other manner deemed appropriate by the director to accomplish the objectives of reasonable notice to adjacent landowners and the public. B. Content of SMP Notice. SMP notices shall include: 1. A statement that any person desiring to submit written comments concerning an application, or desiring to receive notification of the final decision concerning an application, may submit comments, or requests for the decision, to the director within 30 days of the last date that notice is published pursuant to this subsection; 2. A statement that any person may submit oral or written comments at the hearing; 3. An explanation of the manner in which the public may obtain a copy of the city’s decision on the application no later than two days after its issuance. C. Public Comment on an SMP Notice.Public Comment Period. The public comment period shall be is 30 days from the date of issuance of the notice until 11:59 p.m. on the final day of the notice period or until the close of any required public hearing. D. The director shall mail or otherwise deliver a copy of the decision to each person who submits comments or a written request for the decision. [Ord. 3817 § 3, 2010]. 20.03.006 Optional public notice. The director, in his or her sole discretion, may: EXHIBIT A 27 A. Notify the public or private groups with known interest in a proposal or type of proposal; B. Notify the news media; C. Place notices in appropriate regional or neighborhood newspapers or trade journals; D. Publish notice in agency newsletters or send notice to agency mailing lists, either general lists or lists for specific proposals or subject areas; and E. Mail notice to additional neighboring property owners. [Ord. 3817 § 3, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 4 (Exh. A), 2009. Formerly 20.03.003]. Chapter 20.12 DISTRICT-BASED DESIGN REVIEW 20.12.005 Outline of process and statement of intent. The architectural design board (ADB) process has been developed in order to provide for public and design professional input prior to the expense incurred by a developer in preparation of detailed design. In combination, Chapter 20.10 ECDC and this chapter are intended to permit public and ADB input at an early point in the process while providing greater assurance to a developer that his general project design has been approved before the final significant expense of detailed project design is incurred. In general, the process is as follows: A. Public Hearing (Phase 1). The applicant shall submit a preliminary conceptual design to the city. Staff shall schedule the first phase of the ADB hearing within 30 days of staff’s determination that the application is complete. Upon receipt, staff shall provide full notice of a public hearing, noting that the public hearing shall be conducted in two phases. The entire single public hearing on the conceptual design shall be on the record. At the initial phase, the applicant shall present facts which describe in detail the tract of land to be developed noting all significant characteristics. The ADB shall make factual findings regarding the particular characteristics of the property and shall prioritize the design guideline checklist based upon these facts, the provisions of the city’s design guideline elements of the comprehensive plan and the Edmonds Community Development Code. Following establishment of the design guideline checklist, the public hearing shall be continued to a date certain requested by the applicant, not to exceed 120 days from the meeting date. The 120-day170-day city review EXHIBIT A 28 period required by RCW 36.70B.080 commences with the application for Phase 1 of the public hearing. The 120-day 170-day time period is suspended, however, while the applicant further develops their application for Phase 2 of the public hearing. This suspension is based upon the finding of the city council, pursuant to RCW 36.70B.080, that additional time is required to process this project type. The city has no control over the length of time needed or taken by an applicant to complete its application. B. Continued Public Hearing (Public Hearing, Phase 2). The purpose of the continuance is to permit the applicant to design or redesign his initial conceptual design to address the input of the public and the ADB by complying with the prioritized design guideline checklist criteria. When the applicant has completed his design or redesign, he shall submit that design for final review. The matter shall be set for the next available regular ADB meeting date. If the applicant fails to submit his or her design within 180 days, the staff shall report the matter to the ADB who shall note that the applicant has failed to comply with the requirements of the code and find that the original design checklist criteria approval is void. The applicant may reapply at any time. Such reapplication shall establish a new 120-day 170-day review period and establish a new vesting date. C. After completing the hearing process, the final detailed design shall be presented to the city in conjunction with the applicable building permit application. The city staff’s decision on the building permit shall be a ministerial act applying the specific conditions or requirements set forth in the ADB’s approval, but only those requirements. A staff decision on the building permit shall be final and appealable only as provided in the Land Use Petition Act. No other internal appeal of the staff’s ministerial decisions on the building permit is allowed. [Ord. 4302 § 4 (Att. A), 2023; Ord. 3636 § 3, 2007]. Chapter 20.75 SUBDIVISIONS 20.75.065 Preliminary review. A. Responsibility for Review. The planning and development director, or a designated planning staff member, is in charge of administering the preliminary review of all subdivisions. The public works director and the fire department, and other departments if needed, shall EXHIBIT A 29 participate in preliminary review by appropriate recommendations on subjects within their respective areas of expertise. B. Repealed by Ord. 4314. Repealed. C. Time Limits for Staff Review. Staff review shall be completed within 120 days from the date of filing. DC. Formal Subdivision Review. The hearing examiner shall review a formal subdivision as a Type III-A decision in accordance with provisions of Chapter 20.06 ECDC. ED. Short Subdivisions – Staff Review. The director of planning and development shall review a short subdivision as a Type II decision (Staff decision – Notice required). FE. Appeal of Staff Decision. Any person may appeal to the hearing examiner a Type II decision of the planning and development director on a short subdivision under the procedure set forth in Chapter 20.06 ECDC. [Ord. 4314 § 85 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4299 § 57 (Exh. A), 2023; Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019; Ord. 4070 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2017; Ord. 3817 § 12, 2010; Ord. 3736 § 65, 2009; Ord. 3211 §§ 4, 5, 1998; Ord. 3112 §§ 17, 18, 19, 1996; Ord. 2379 § 2, 1983]. 20.75.070 Formal subdivision – Time limit. The city shall make its final decision on a proposed formal subdivision within 90 days of the date of filing the timelines found in the Decision Table in ECDC 20.01.003(B), unless the applicant agrees to extend the time. Where applicable, additional time needed to prepare and circulate an environmental impact statement shall not be included within said 90 days. [Ord. 4154 § 4 (Att. C), 2019; Ord. 4070 § 1 (Exh. 1), 2017]. EXHIBIT A 30 Title 21 DEFINITIONS 21.80.095 Project permit or project permit application. Project permit or project permit application for purposes of the ECDC means any land use or environmental permit or license required by the ECDC for a project action, including but not limited to building permits, subdivisions, binding site plans, planned unit developments, conditional uses, shoreline substantial development permits, site plan review, permits or approvals required by critical areas ordinances, site-specific rezones authorized by a comprehensive plan or sub-area plan, which do not require a comprehensive plan amendment, but excluding the adoption or amendment of a comprehensive plan, subarea plan, or development regulations except as otherwise specifically included in this subsection. [Ord. 3112 § 36, 1996]. ' '. Everett Daily Herald Affidavit of Publication State of Washington } County of Snohomish } ss Michael Gates being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says : that be/she is the legal representative of the Everett Daily Herald a daily newspaper. The said newspaper is a legal newspaper by order of the superior court in the county in which it is published and is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of the first publication of the Notice hereinafter referred to, published in the English language continually as a daily newspaper in Snohomish County, Washington and is and always has been printed in whole or part in the Everett Daily Herald and is of general circulation in said County, and is a legal newspaper, in accordance with the Chapter 99 of the Laws of 1921, as amended by Chapter 213, Laws of 1941, and approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of Snohomish County, State of Washington, by order dated June 16, 1941, and that the annexed is a true copy of EDH1005013 ORD NO 4371/4372 as it was published in the regular and entire issue of said paper and not as a supplement form thereof for a period of 1 issue(s), such publication commencing on 11/08/2024 and ending on 11/08/2024 and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during all of said period. The amoun $32.68. publication is Subscribed and sworn before me on this y; fu day of V\ov~ Yo1.&1 . -------=-~~-----A.. ____ e~~? Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. City of Edmonds. LEGAL ADS 114101416 SCOTT PASSEY .. Classified Proof ORWNANCE SUMMARY or lhe c, of EctmoM,, Washington On tho 41~ Cay ot November, 202◄, the City Cqunc!I or ltie. Clly or Ectmoncts, pa, .. d !ho torrowlng Or<l lnan<:es , Ille summary. or sa id ordlnanoos to~srsUng or mres ore pcovloed as ftl l ows : ORDINANCE NO. •37 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS. WASH INGTON . UPDATING TH E CITY'S PERMIT PROCESSlNG TIMELINES ANO PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS TO AC HIEV E COMPLIA NCE WITH SB 5290 AND HB 1105. ORQINANCE NO. 4372 AN o:s~~~~~ grnm.~gr N~ ~~~c:so:;:~G~fN;FTON, UNANTICIPATED TR ANSFERS ANO EX PENOJTIJRES OF VA·RIOUS FUNDS, ANO FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE. g~Tl8J~:.igiw P:~~r'· 2024 . Pub¥shed: November 8, 2024 . ED H1005013 Proofed by Pospical, Randie, 11/08 /2024 08:07 :45 am Page : 2